Loading...
FWCP Chap 01 Introduction_201302271049329043CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) lays out a vision for the future of Federal Way during a 20-year period and responds to the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA) of 1990 and subsequent amendments. The FWCP also carries out Vision 2020, the Puget Sound region's multiple urban growth centers concept, and King County's Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs), which call for multiple urban centers and a strong urban growth boundary. This chapter gives an overview of the comprehensive planning effort, profiles Federal Way's past and present, and concludes with a discussion of Federal Way's vision for its future. This plan contains a glossary of terms at the end of the document to help the reader with terms that may not be clear or understandable. 1.1 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING EFFORT Why Plan? Federal Way plans for people. People need a safe and secure place to live, an economy that provides jobs, a transportation system that allows them to get around, and schools, colleges, and recreational opportunities. It is the city government's responsibility to provide public services and facilities, develop policies, and adopt regulations to guide the growth of a city that meets the needs of its people. From incorporation to the present, the guide for Federal Way's growth and development has been the Comprehensive Plan. What Is a Comprehensive Plan? The role of the FWCP is to state clearly our community's vision for its future, and to articulate a plan for accomplishing this vision over a 20-year period. The FWCP seeks to answer a number of questions: • What areas are most suitable for development or redevelopment? • What areas should be preserved in their natural state? • Where should growth occur? • How can we manage that growth to realize our vision for the community? • How should we address traffic congestion? • How many parks do we need, of what size, kind, and where? • What steps should we take to encourage economic development? FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction • How can we encourage preservation of our historic resources? • How can we ensure an adequate supply of affordable housing for all income levels? • What utilities and public services will we need? • How will the community pay for all of these things? Each of the FWCP's chapters addresses these questions, and more, in the areas of transportation, land use, economic development, capital facilities, utilities, and housing. The answers form the policies, which guide implementation of our community vision. The policy statements within each chapter are used to guide new or revised zoning and other regulations. The FWCP also sets a clear frame -work for where the community will need to spend money on capital facilities, how much, and identifies available funding sources. As a whole, the FWCP offers a flexible framework for Federal Way's future, allowing for adaptation to real conditions over time. Why Revise Our Plan? Between 1990, when the interim comprehensive plan was first adopted by the City of Federal Way, and 2006, the City has grown from 19.9 square miles and 67,554 people, to 22.49 square miles and 86,530 people. This rapid growth and change in the character of the City has naturally provided impetus to revise and update the comprehensive plan. The FWCP, and the code amendments which follow it, reflect the unique characteristics of our community and public input on Federal Way's vision for its future. Requirements of the Growth Management Act The GMA (RCW 36.70A. 140) was passed by the Washington State Legislature in 1990, with amendments added in 1991 and subsequent years. The legislature passed the GMA in recognition of the rate of growth that was occurring throughout the state, particularly on the west side of the Cascades. The legislature was responding not only to the rate of growth, but also to the type and location of growth. Two-thirds of the state's population and household growth in the 1980s took place in unincorporated areas, and produced sprawling subdivisions, commercial strips, and urbanization of land, which only ten years before, was rural. This rapid growth pattern resulted in increased traffic congestion and inadequate public services, and has threatened forestland, agricultural land, and environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands. These impacts have been felt in Federal Way, just as they have been felt in other parts of the state. The GMA requires that each jurisdiction produce a comprehensive plan that contains, at a minimum, elements pertaining to land use, transportation, capital facilities, housing, private utilities, economic development, and parks and recreation. These elements must be consistent with one another. Jurisdictions also are required to adopt policies and regulations protecting resource lands and critical areas, such as agricultural land, wetlands, and hillsides. Each jurisdiction must coordinate its plan with the plans of surrounding jurisdictions. Revised 2013 1-2 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction The GMA also requires that each city designate an urban growth boundary (UGA) or potential annexation area (PAA) as they are called in King County. The PAA defines the area within which the city anticipates it could provide the full range of urban services at some time in the future. It also represents the area within which the city will consider annexations and the boundary beyond which it will not annex. Perhaps what most distinguishes the GMA from previous planning statutes is the requirement that public services be available or funded at some designated level of service before development may occur. If a jurisdiction cannot provide services to an area, then it may not permit development in that area. The 1991 amendments to the GMA require all counties planning under the act to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs). The jurisdictions in King County formed a group called the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) composed of elected officials from the King County Council, City of Seattle, and suburban cities. The mission of the GMPC was to draft the CWPPs for King County. These policies were adopted in 1992 and are binding on the jurisdictions in the County. In 1994, major amendments to the CWPPs were proposed by the GMPC. These amendments were subsequently adopted by King County and are binding on all jurisdictions in the County, although it should be noted that Federal Way voted not to ratify. Since 1994, the CWPPs have been updated as needed. After approval and ratification by the King County Council, amendments are forwarded to the cities for ratification. Amendments to the CWPPs only become effective when ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments, representing 70 percent of the population of King County. The FWCP has been prepared according to the provisions of the GMA and the CWPPs. However, Federal Way's plan also contains many components that are not referenced in the GMA; these additional components are included in the plan due to their importance to the Federal Way community. Although Federal Way's goals and policies for growth and the provision of services are guided by GMA requirements, and are based in part upon state and regional goals, they primarily reflect the vision and goals of our own citizens. How Was the Plan Developed? The ideas in the FWCP were developed through discussion, debate, and the creative thinking of thousands of Federal Way citizens, working with City staff and elected officials. Consistent with the GMA, the City of Federal Way provided early and continuous opportunities for citizens to participate in CityShape. CityShape was the name given to the City's comprehensive planning project. CityShape was the process used to develop the FWCP. CityShape, the process, started in the Fall of 1992 with a series of open houses and field trips. The first open house was held on September 16t'', and featured displays from all City departments and the various special service districts. The event had two objectives. The first was to explain to citizens how urban services are delivered, how much those services cost, and how citizens could be involved in the development of the City's new comprehensive plan. The second objective was to have people describe their likes and Revised 2013 1-3 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction dislikes about the City as it existed in 1992 and share their thoughts about what the City ought to look like in 20 years. The second major CityShape event occurred on October 26, 1992. The event was a field trip to Burnaby and Vancouver, British Columbia, to look at one possible future for Federal Way. The Vancouver area has a light rail system called Sky Train and Burnaby has a high density suburban shopping mall 20 miles southeast of downtown Vancouver. The City took 70 members of its various Boards and Commissions to look at how light rail works; how land use is influenced by rail and vice versa; what a redeveloped, mixed use, high intensity shopping mall looks like; and how attractive higher density residential neighborhoods can look, given specific development guidelines. On November 19, 1992, the City conducted a second open house. This time the objective was to review and evaluate three land use plan alternatives. The first alternative was a slow growth concept with a land use pattern that was fairly similar to what currently exists in the City. The second was a moderate growth concept that focused the majority of new growth in a redeveloped, higher density, mixed use downtown. The third alternative was a higher growth scenario that included the downtown concept of alternative two, but also envisioned an expanded office park/business park concept in the vicinity of West Campus and the 348`t' Street corridor. Those present seemed to favor a hybrid with characteristics of alternatives two and three. Economic development and growth was the topic of the third open house held January 21, 1993. The CityShape staff team presented three economic development alternatives with low, medium, and higher growth concepts. Participants expressed support for a medium to high growth scenario that diversified the economic base in Federal Way and gave the community about as many jobs as there are projected households in the year 2012. The next open house was held on March 10, 1993, and focused on the vision for a City Center. Attendees completed two exercises. The first was to evaluate three alternative orientations for a downtown: east/west along 3201h Street, north/south in the vicinity of 20' Avenue, and along a diagonal from Steel Lake Park to 320'h and Highway 99. The second exercise was to use building blocks to accommodate projected growth in the downtown. The higher the density, the smaller the area for downtown. The lower the density, the more spread out the downtown. Participants concluded that a higher density, pedestrian -friendly downtown oriented north/south from the center of SeaTac Mall made good sense and accommodated a high capacity transit system. On June 2, 1993, the City staff provided interested citizens with a short course in transportation planning. The presentation identified the congested street corridors as they were in 1992 and projected how and where congestion would increase by 2012, given the impacts of growth. Staff also presented five different arterial improvement alternatives which would either maintain or reduce congestion by 2012, together with some estimate of the effectiveness of particular arterial improvements for resolving transportation problems in the community. The participants concluded that the maximum construction option called "super widening" was not appropriate or even feasible. They did, however, favor a more modest list of arterial improvements, including a "diagonal parkway" along the BPA power line, which generally maintained the 1992 level of service. Revised 2013 14 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction The last two public forums dealt with capital facilities planning. The first of these was held June 22, 1993. At this session, staff gave participants level of service options for streets and parks, provided cost estimates associated with each level of service, and asked participants working in groups to agree on the level of service they wanted for streets and parks based on their willingness to pay for service. With a high level of consensus, participants were willing to pay for a parks level of service of 10.5 acres per thousand population. Given the cost for streets, the desired level of service was to lower the standard about 60 percent from the 1993 level. The second capital facilities public forum was held December 9, 1993, and focused on how to pay for services. At this forum, each work group was given a work sheet that described total capital costs for parks and streets, and data describing the revenue sources available to cities and how much revenue each source could potentially generate. The objective was to develop a financing package, including recommended taxing levels, which would pay for the desired street and park system. There was a lot of disagreement, but voter -approved bond issues, impact fees, and to a lesser extent, utility taxes received some support as the preferred revenue sources. On the other hand, there was near total agreement that there should be no business and occupation tax in Federal Way. In November 1993, the City published a draft environmental impact statement that evaluated the various growth, land use, City Center, transportation, and capital facilities options. In addition, the staff -consulting team began writing the various chapters of the FWCP, consistent with the direction that emerged from the field trips, open houses, and public meetings. Early in 1994, the City's Planning Commission began holding work sessions, to which the public was invited, to review each of the chapters as they were written and provide comments and feedback as appropriate. The Commission started with the Private Utilities chapter on March 2, followed by Housing (3-9-94), Potential Annexation (3-16-94), Natural Environment (4-13-94), Economic Development (4-27- 94), Land Use and City Center (6-1-94), Capital Facilities (8-3-94), and ended with the Transportation Chapter on September 7, 1994. In the Fall of 1994, staff was ready to begin assimilating the individual chapters to create an integrated comprehensive plan. As part of that process, staff concluded it was again time to touch base with the City Council to ensure the FWCP was on target with their expectations. To facilitate the discussion, staff prepared a two -page vision statement that summarized the FWCP. The City Council reviewed the vision statement at a retreat on February 24, and 25, 1995, and indicated it was on target. The vision statement was subsequently expanded to a 20 page executive summary of the FWCP, including general policy direction. On April 18, 1995, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the expanded vision statement and, based in part on the testimony, proposed some amendments to it. On May 2, 1995, the City Council formally reviewed the expanded vision statement and directed staff to complete the FWCP as soon as possible. To this point, the narrative has focused on the formal public participation process. Revised 2013 1-5 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction Concurrently, there were a series of meetings to which staff was invited to talk about the future of Federal Way, vision, land use planning in general, and the comprehensive plan more specifically. There were hundreds of these meetings over the course of two years. They included slide shows, small discussion groups, meetings with neighborhood associations, the Chamber of Commerce's monthly luncheon and its subcommittees, real estate brokers, property owners, elementary and high school classrooms, displays at the mall, civic organizations, and many others. The result was broad based interest and participation in the development of the City's new comprehensive plan. At the time the FWCP was released, the mailing list contained over 700 names, all of which were notified that the Hearing Draft Comprehensive Plan was available for public review and comment. The Hearing Draft of the FWCP was completed and released for public review on July 5, 1995. Subsequently, the FWCP was adopted on November 21, 1995, by the City Council per Ordinance 95-248. Thereafter, amendments to the FWCP were adopted per Ordinances 98-330 on December 15, 1998, 00-372 on September 14, 2000, 01-405 on November 15, 2001, 03-442 on March 27, 2003, 04-460 on July 20, 2004, and 05-490, 05-491, and 05-492 on June 16, 2005. Organization of The Plan While we cannot predict the future, we can attempt to shape the type of community in which we live, work, and play. The FWCP functions as the City's statement of how it will meet the challenges posed by growth in the 21 st century. The heart of the FWCP is the nine individual elements that outline goals and policies. These elements constitute the chapters of the plan. The FWCP includes seven chapters that are mandated by the GMA: land use, transportation, capital facilities, housing, private utilities, economic development, and parks and recreation. The Parks and Recreation Plan is a stand-alone plan, rather than a separate chapter within the FWCP, however, it is incorporated by reference in the Capital Facilities Chapter. The FWCP also includes three chapters which the GMA does not mandate, but that are very appropriate. The first is an annexation chapter as discussed earlier in this chapter. The second is a chapter that describes the City's commitment to the preservation of the natural environment and the policy direction to make it happen. Finally, the FWCP includes a subarea plan for the City Center that reflects the City's vision for the future and helps to implement the regional vision for a hierarchy of urban centers in the Puget Sound. Each of these chapters has been coordinated with the others, resulting in a plan that is internally consistent. Each of the goals in the FWCP, while expressing a specific policy direction, also functions as part of a coordinated expression of the City's vision for the fixture. Plan implementation is the next step and is discussed in the final section of this chapter. 1.2 FEDERAL WAY'S COMMUNITY PROFILE: PAST AND PRESENT Revised 2013 1-6 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction Planning for the future requires a good understanding of how our community has grown and changed in the past. The following discussion provides that backdrop as a context for subsequent chapters. The earliest recorded accounts of the Federal Way area tell of Native American families who resided in the area of the Muckleshoot Reservation on the east side of the Green River Valley and traveled west to the shores of Puget Sound for the plentiful fisheries resources. Generations of Muckleshoot Indians wore a westward trail across the heavily forested plateau to the area which is now Saltwater State Park. The arrival of the white man in the nineteenth century resulted in a steady decline in the Indian population and by 1890, nearly the entire population had disappeared from the area. Isolated on a triangular shaped plateau rising steeply from Puget Sound, the Federal Way area had little waterfront access or roadways and accordingly, was sparingly developed compared to Tacoma and Seattle. As late as the turn of the century, the original settlers at Dash Point and Dumas Bay had to row to Tacoma for supplies and mail. Old Military Road, constructed around 1856 and extending north from Fort Steilacoom, past Star Lake to Seattle and Fort Lawton, was the first road through the area. Over time, narrow dirt roads were added to provide east/west access and by 1900, a road was constructed between Star Lake and Redondo. The second crossroad, the "Seattle Road," connected old Military Road and Kent. The Seattle -Tacoma Interurban Line, completed in 1901, provided a fast and easy way to reach these urban cities. Improved access brought many visitors to the area and Star Lake became a popular summer recreation site. By the 1920s, Federal Highway 99, the interstate that linked the western states from north to south, was complete. At this time, Federal Way was still primarily forest and farmland. Fred Hoyt had a cabin on Dumas Bay and started a road to Tacoma (still called Hoyt Road). The timber companies, which had a major logging operation going, built an early railroad line and were instrumental in getting Marine View Highway (now Dash Point Road) built in the early 1920s. This roadway spurred development along the coastline. Soon thereafter, Peasley Canyon Road was built to connect Military Road with the Auburn Valley. This road later became known as South 3201h Street. In these early days, roadways set the stage for development in the area and they still play an important role in the City today. By the start of World War II, a number of small, thriving communities made up the area that is now Federal Way. Some communities were clustered around lakes, such as Steel Lake, Star Lake, and Lake Geneva. Others were sited to take advantage of the view of Puget Sound, like Adelaide and Buenna. As each of these communities grew, residents built small schoolhouses for their children. By the late 1940s, King County consolidated the many individual red schoolhouses into the Federal Way School District, from which the City gets its name. During this same period, a library was built along the edge of Highway 99, and between Revised 2013 1-7 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction 308t' Street and 320t' Street, a small "downtown" developed with a general store, lumber yard, realty office, beauty parlor, feed store, and gas station. By the end of the 1950s, the ten blocks between 308t' and 320t' Streets became the first roadside commercial district. One of the more unique developments was Santa Faire, a family oriented theme park. New shopping areas were added around the park, helping to create a "community focus" for the residents of the area. As this commercial area developed, the rest of Federal Way was changing as well. The Boeing Company expanded their operations in Renton and the Kent Valley and began advertising nationally for engineers. Those engineers in turn began roaming the wooded acreage in Federal Way in search of housing. One of the earliest residential developments was Marine Hills, built in 1958 overlooking Puget Sound. Weyerhaeuser, one of the early timber companies, had large land holdings in the area and began to develop their land into high quality housing with amenities like golf courses. Weyerhaeuser's development company also began developing commercial property, creating the West Campus business park. The plan was to integrate offices and businesses with lush landscaping. Though initially the corporate office market was not strong, West Campus has grown almost to capacity, providing space for many civic buildings such as City Hall, the police station, the area's major health care centers, and higher density housing. Another major landmark in the area is the Commons, built in the mid- 1970s on what was farmland south of 320"' Street. The Commons is one of the largest malls in South King County and is the anchor for retail development in the area. The mall was a result of population growth in the region and its location was determined by the 320'hStreet intersection with Interstate 5. The Interstate supplanted Highway 99 as the main artery for commuter traffic in the County. By the mid 1980s, South King County was growing quickly. Retail growth occurred along Highway 99, especially at the 320' Street intersection. Roads and office space were developed to accommodate the increased growth. Residential growth was also prominent, following plans developed by King County, with a large number of apartment homes. The changes to the community, with increased housing and traffic, created a movement for greater self-determination. In 1989, the citizens of this area voted for incorporation and the City of Federal Way was born, incorporating on February 28, 1990. Federal Way's Future Vision Federal Way's challenge for the future is to protect what the community believes is most important, while meeting the state's growth management goals. The following paragraphs describe what Federal Way will look like in the year 2022, and beyond, if it balances these growth management mandates with the needs and desires of Federal Way citizens. Federal Way is a great place to live, work, and play because of its: Government For and By the People: All governmental entities reflect the can -do attitude of Revised 2013 1-8 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction Federal Way citizens and partner with them to provide quality services, often through volunteerism. Governmental entities reflect the community's values of diversity, innovation, and participation. Together, the community and its neighborhoods have built a sense of identity and ownership for Federal Way and its future. Fiscally conservative, innovative financial and management (contracting model) strategies, along with economic growth, have allowed the community to enjoy a moderate tax rate, with bond issues approved to support major projects. The community vision has maintained a focus and continuity for staff and fiscal resources on the defined vision. Responsible Growth: The community realized that some level of growth in all segments of the community (economic, population, housing, etc.) was inevitable, and chose to channel that growth into very specific development goals. The overall character of the community has remained much as it was 20 years ago. Infrastructure has been developed concurrently with growth, preserving the community's quality of life. Development goals have fostered the preservation of a primarily residential community and open natural areas, with concentrated urban development in the City's Center. An increase in the number of corporate headquarters, annexation of the Potential Annexation Areas (PAA), and build out of available single-family sites, at competitive prices, has accommodated Federal Way's population target. Some new multiple -family development is concentrated in the City Center/99 corridor area, primarily through downtown condominiums. This pedestrian friendly, multi -use City Center, with multi -story and underground parking facilities works well for many. Federal Way citizens enjoy the pedestrian plazas of the City Center. Statewide planning goal #6 states, "Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions." The City supports preservation of private property rights; however, property rights must be balanced with the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. Economic Vitality: Strategically located in the Pacific Rim, between SeaTac Airport and the Port of Tacoma, Federal Way provides jobs as an international and regional retail and employment center. Federal Way is also home to several corporate headquarters located in East and West Campus. Companies choose Federal Way for its sense of neighborhood identity, mix of housing stock, proximity to natural resources (mountains, oceans, and waterways), and safety. The growth in the corporate headquarters segment of the economy has netted economic spinoffs for Federal Way's small business community, as small business provides support services for the corporate park companies. Growth in the small business economy has generated some redevelopment of previously large retail warehouse facilities to accommodate office, retail, and light manufacturing. Quality jobs have boosted disposable income, supporting expansion of Federal Way's retail and commercial sectors. The resulting enhancements to the community's tax base have helped to support a high quality of community life. Efficient Traffic System: Federal Way's transportation system links neighborhoods with the City Center, and Federal Way with other communities in the Puget Sound region. Concentrated economic growth in East and West Campus and the City Center has allowed Revised 2013 1-9 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction mass transit to connect Federal Way's economic core with the economic and leisure hubs of Puget Sound communities. Concentrated growth has allowed the community to maintain the infrastructure in outlying areas, focusing new infrastructure in the City's Center. Youth have found the transportation system easy and safe to use in getting to school. Safety, Infrastructure, and Utilities: This issue has been addressed at the neighborhood level, where community -based policing philosophies and citizen efforts to create a sense of neighborhood with real and perceived safety are most effective. A professional and compassionate law enforcement force communicates clearly with the community's diverse populations and business community, providing a visible community presence, as well as acceptable emergency call response times. Improvements in safety have been a cornerstone for the community's economic and residential growth. The utility and fire districts share this community vision and have targeted their efforts and resources to continue to provide effective and efficient delivery of water, sewer, telephone, television, power, and fire services. Increased coordination between these districts and the City, and these districts and their regional counter -parts, has ensured adequate service expansion to make the community's development vision a reality. Caringfor Our Own: Governmental and social service agencies work in concert to provide a caring and safe environment for all Federal Way citizens. Ever -improving educational institutions, public and private, serve all interests and ages throughout the community. Neighborhoods have joined with the schools in their area to improve student achievement, school facilities, and resources. Strong educational institutions and the leadership of the Federal Way School District, Highline Community College, and DeVry University have contributed to the community's economic growth, providing a trained work force and quality education for the families of employees who locate here. The City has been the catalyst for creating a one -stop shopping center for human services, with programs at all levels of government requiring greater participation from clients in improving their individual situations. Quality Culture, Environment, and Play: Parks, trails, sports, urban agriculture, and cultural arts facilities cater to the active lifestyle of Federal Way citizens. By partnering with the Federal Way School District and other agencies, the community has developed a long- range plan for facilities, parks, and services, which is yielding more and better facilities, and joint facility utilization than any one agency could provide alone. A performing and cultural arts center has been built, although it will require operating subsidies for its first eight years. The Federal Way area is blessed with a bounty of natural beauty and scenery. This bounty includes dramatic vistas of Mt. Rainier; numerous lakes, streams, and wetlands; the pastoral setting in the Spring Valley area; and views of Puget Sound and Vashon Island from the saltwater ridge. The City is committed to preserving this vast natural resource for the citizens and future citizens of Federal Way. Regional Player: Finally, Federal Way institutions and citizens are regional partners and participants in the economic, political, and cultural life of Puget Sound. This participation Revised 2013 1-10 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction has yielded funding opportunities for community facilities, including housing and human services. Other regional efforts have safeguarded the community against outside impacts that detract from our community's quality of life. Regional participation has crossed the seas with sister city relationships which are supported by Federal Way citizens. These relationships have had significant cultural, educational, and economic benefits for the community. This vision will not be easily achieved. It will require difficult choices. In order to grow gracefully, and remain a healthy and desirable community, tomorrow's higher density growth areas must be accompanied by improved amenities for urban life. More resources will be required to maintain the high quality of life we currently enjoy, thanks to our parks, streets, and other public services. A combined effort of the public sector, neighborhood groups, businesses, schools, and individual citizens will be required. The early and continuing cooperation and collaboration of these groups in this process will ensure this vision will be realized. Getting to the Future from the Present The FWCP is intended to manage growth and change in Federal Way over the next 20 years. The future described in the FWCP cannot be achieved all at once. Over the life of the FWCP, growth will likely occur more slowly at times, more rapidly at others, and in somewhat different patterns and sequences than is currently foreseen. The best a comprehensive plan can be is a well-educated guess about how to accommodate people and conditions that cannot be known in advance. An effective comprehensive plan must be flexible enough to succeed within a range of likely conditions and must be adjusted as those conditions are monitored and evaluated, while maintaining a steady aim at its ultimate goals. How Will The Plan Be Implemented? Adopting a comprehensive plan is the first step toward realizing the City's vision. The vision is achieved when the comprehensive plan is implemented. Federal Way's implementation program is comprised of a combination of short-term and long-term actions. Short-term actions include the approval of rezones that match the FWCP's land use designations. Other actions include the annual update of the City's six year Capital Improvement Program, which describes the street, park, and surface water utility projects the City intends to build. There are also long-term actions including subarea planning, monitoring, evaluating, and amending the FWCP as conditions change; and developing a capital investment program that allocates resources to projects that will spur the City's development in the direction envisioned in the FWCP. Subarea Plans: Subarea plans will follow the adoption of the FWCP and will produce amendments that tailor the FWCP's citywide perspective to individual areas, whether they are neighborhood retail nodes or light manufacturing areas. The FWCP contains a Revised 2013 1-11 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction subarea plan for the City Center. Subarea plans are expected to continue to aid in adjusting and fine-tuning the FWCP over time. Coordination with Other Jurisdictions: Federal Way representatives have participated with King County, other cities, and the Puget Sound Regional Council in numerous discussions. Some issues have been addressed and others have been identified for additional discussion. Undoubtedly, continued regional planning forums will need to be created to meet the GMA's challenge for regional action toward creating, implementing, and funding a shared vision for the greater Puget Sound region. Regulatory Provisions: Implementing the FWCP will include retaining, modifying, and/or replacing existing regulations, and/or drafting new regulations consistent with the policies and goals of the FWCP. For instance, in 2002 the City formed a stakeholders group that reviewed the City's permitting process and made recommendations on how to improve and/or modify the regulations and process. This group continues to meet once a year to provide input to the City's development review process. A Strategic Investment Strategy: This will describe a framework for making resource allocation decisions in an environment where wants and needs always exceed the finite resources available. Tradeoffs among many possible investment choices will be made to achieve the FWCP's goals. The framework will add dimension to the FWCP's goals by enabling them to be addressed over time. Human Services, Public Safety, and Environmental Planning: These will continue to build upon the foundation established by the FWCP. Much of the FWCP, as developed to fulfill the GMA, addresses physical development and its related regulatory and fiscal support. Federal Way works with other levels of government, non-profit providers, and citizen groups to support an array of activities and services that contribute to the quality of life of Federal Way's citizens. These include public safety; health, cultural, educational, and environmental activities; and human services. To ensure that the interrelationships of all aspects of urban life are addressed, planning will be undertaken by the City in a way that is supportive of and coordinated with the FWCP. Monitoring and Evaluation: This will be done periodically to assess progress toward achieving FWCP goals, as well as to measure the conditions and changes occurring within the City. Monitoring and evaluation will help ensure consistency within and among the FWCP chapters, as well as with the GMA, the CWPPs, and county and regional growth plans. Monitoring and evaluation will lead to both FWCP amendments and improved ability to project future conditions. Citizen participation in City processes will build upon the dialogue between government and citizens that began with the development and adoption of the FWCP. The City will strive to find improved means to communicate with, and involve citizens in planning and decision -making. The City will strive to provide information that can be easily understood and to provide access for public involvement. This will include processes for making amendments to and implementing the FWCP. Revised 2013 1-12 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction Application of the Plan The principal purpose of the comprehensive plan is to provide policies that guide the development of the City in the context of regional growth management. These policies can be looked to by citizens and all levels of government in planning for the future of Federal Way. The FWCP format generally presents a discussion about an issue followed by a goal, and some policies related to that goal. Goals describe what the City hopes to realize over time, and are not mandates or guarantees. Policies describe actions that will need to be taken if the City is to realize its goals. Policies should be read as if preceded by the words, "It is the City's general policy to...." A policy helps guide the creation or change of specific rules or strategies (such as development regulations, budgets, or program area plans). City officials will generally make decisions on specific City actions by following ordinances, resolutions, budgets, or program area plans that themselves reflect relevant FWCP policies, rather than by referring directly to the FWCP. Implementation of most policies involves a range of City actions over time, so one cannot simply ask whether a specific action or project would fulfill a particular FWCP policy. For example, a policy that the City will "give priority to" a particular need indicates that need will be treated as important, not that it will take precedence in every City decision. Some policies use the words "shall" or "should," "ensure" or "encourage," and so forth. In general, such words describe the relative degree of emphasis that the policy imparts, but not necessarily to establish specific legal duty to perform a particular act, to undertake a program or project, or to achieve a specific result. Whether such a result is intended must be determined by reading the policy as a whole, and by examining the context of other related policies in the FWCP. Some policies may appear to conflict, particularly in the context of a specific fact situation or viewed from the different perspectives of persons whose interests may conflict on a given issue. A classic example is the "conflict" between policies calling for "preservation of the environment" and policies that "promote economic development." Because FWCP policies do not exist in isolation and must be viewed in the context of all potentially relevant policies, it is largely in the application of those policies that the interests, which they embody, are reconciled and balanced by the legislative and executive branches of City government. Before the FWCP was adopted, the City of Federal Way had many policies in place that were approved over the course of many years, and which affect the full range of programs and services provided by the City. To the extent a conflict may arise between such a policy and the FWCP, the FWCP will generally prevail, except that policies that are used in the application of existing development regulations shall continue to be used until those regulations are made consistent with the FWCP pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040. Discussion is provided to explain the context in which decisions on goals and policies have been made, the reasons for those decisions, and how the goals and policies are related. The discussion portions of the FWCP do not establish or modify policies, but Revised 2013 1-13 FWCP — Chapter One, Introduction they may help to interpret policies. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process The City will update the FWCP annually in order to keep this document current with the community's vision and the City Council's policy direction. In addition to updating chapters, such as Capital Facilities, the public will also be notified that a comprehensive plan amendment will be taking place. Individual requests will be considered during the annual update process. Acknowledgments The City Council and staff thank the hundreds of citizens who have made the CityShape project a success. We look forward to working with you and others over the coming years to make your vision Federal Way's future. Revised 2013 1-14