SEPA Checklist 2020-05-29Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 1 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
Department of Community Development Services
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
www.cityoffederalway.com
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are
significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization, or compensatory
mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts, or if an environmental impact statement will be
prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants: [help]
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each
question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or
private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not
apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies and/or reports.
Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process, as well as later in the
decision-making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on
different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental
effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional
information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal,
and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first, but not necessarily the only source of
information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the
lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: [help]
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans, and programs), complete the applicable parts of
sections A and B, plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all
questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal,"
"proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for nonprojects) questions in
Part B (Environmental Elements) that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 2 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
A. BACKGROUND [help]
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: [help]
7-Eleven Convenience Store with Gas
2. Name of applicant: [help]
Breyden Jager, Assistant Planner, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: [help]
Applicant & Contact Person:
Breyden Jager
Assistant Planner
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
18215 72nd Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
(425) 251-6222
4. Date checklist prepared: [help]
May 29, 2020
5. Agency requesting checklist: [help]
City of Federal Way Community Development Department
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): [help]
SEPA/Use Process III Approval September 2020
Construction Permit Submittals August 2020
Construction Start January 2021
Occupancy/Grand Opening June 2021
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal?
If yes, explain. [help]
Plans for future additions, expansions, or any further activity beyond the initial proposed build -out are not
being considered at this time.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal. [help]
Listed below are documents directly related to the environmental review of the applicant 's proposal. These
documents will either be made available in conjunction with this submittal, as a deferred submittal for this
entitlement process or subsequently made available during future permitting processes, as required by City
staff.
Preliminary Civil Site Plan
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 3 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey
3rd Party Wetland Review completed 8/13/19
City of Federal Way Hylebos Fish Use & Habitat Technical Memorandum prepared by HDR
Engineering dated December 2014
Geotechnical Report
Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
Storm Drainage Report
Phase I / Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. [help]
An application seeking Use Process III approval and a Traffic Concurrency Analysis is being processed
concurrently with this checklist. To the best of our knowledge, no other applications are pending for
government approvals at this time.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. [help]
A complete land development permitting process is anticipated, including, but not limited to, the following:
Use Process III Approval
Building Permits
Site Development Permits
Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Permits
Sign Permit
Right-Of-Way Permits
NPDES Stormwater Permit
Utility Connection Permits
Underground Storage Tank Permits and Notifications
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal.
You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include
additional specific information on project description.) [help]
The scope of the project involves the development of a new 4,088 square foot convenience store with
gasoline service station consisting of a 3,096-square-foot canopy over six (6) multi-product dispensers. Two
(2) underground storage tanks (USTs) will be installed consisting of a 25,000-gallon UST for storage of
unleaded gasoline and a 12,000-gallon dual compartment UST for storage of diesel fuel and unleaded
premium gasoline (6,000 gallons each). Adjacent surface parking for 21 vehicles will be provided. The project
also proposes site improvements, including, but not limited to, exterior lighting, access driveways, off -street
parking, interior and perimeter landscaping, and exterior signage.
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 4 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans
required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit
applications related to this checklist. [help]
The project site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Pacific Highway South and South 356 th
Street in the City of Federal Way, Washington, consisting of three (3) adjacent parcels at 35600, 35620 and
35650 Pacific Highway (APNs: 292104-9099, 292104-9052 and 292104-9106). The site is located in the NE
Quarter of Section 29, Township 21, and Range 4. The total project area is approximately 94,279 square feet
(± 2.16 acres). The proposed development will be limited to approximately 1.33 acres of the subject property.
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 5 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS [help]
1. Earth
a. General description of the site [help]
(underline/circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
The subject site generally slopes from east to west with slopes ranging from approximately one percent to
approximately twenty percent with a total relief of eight feet across project area.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? [help]
The steepest slope on the site is approximately 20%.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know
the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial
significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. [help]
According to the United States Department of Agriculture Soils Conservation Services Map, the subject
property is comprised of Everett – Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (6% to 15% slopes). This type of soil is
not classified as "prime farmland" by the United States Department of Agriculture.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. [help]
No surface indicators of soil instability have been visually identified, and to the best of our knowledge, no
history of soil instability exists.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any
filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. [help]
A preliminary analysis of cut/fill activity based on the Preliminary Site Plan indicates an estimated 1,500
cubic yards of total earthwork. An estimated 2,000 cubic yards of cut and 500 cubic yards of imported fill
material. Most of the cut material will likely be hauled off site, but depending on existing soil conditions, the
cut may be able to be re-compacted on site. Grading activity will utilize onsite material whenever possible,
in an effort to minimize fill. All imported fill will be sourced from the approved sites and documented
accordingly. Excavations will occur for both Building and Canopy footings as well as new Underground
Storage Tanks and Detention Facilities.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. [help]
There is a relatively low risk of erosion with consideration to the proposed Erosion Control Measures for the
site. A sediment trap, silt fence, catch basin protection, covering/seeding measures, and a construction
entrance will likely be utilized on-site to minimize erosion potential.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)? [help]
The subject parcel will be approximately covered in 41% impervious surfaces upon project completion.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: [help]
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 6 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
A sediment trap, silt fence, catch basin protection, covering/seeding measures, and a construction entrance
will likely be utilized on-site to minimize erosion potential. After the construction is completed, final slope
stabilization measures including ground cover, seeding, mulch, and other measures will be used.
Stormwater quality and quantity control will be implemented to reduce the project's impact to downstream
erosion and water quality concerns.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and
maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if
known. [help]
Airborne particulates (dust) along with vehicular exhaust from construction equipment are the most likely
short-term sources of emissions during construction activity. The primary source of long-term emissions
will be from vehicular exhaust, as a byproduct of the operation for the gasoline service station.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
[help]
Aside from vehicular exhaust originating with traffic on the adjacent rights-of-way, no off-site sources of
emissions and/or odors have been identified.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: [help]
Airborne particulates will be minimized through surface watering during the construction phase of the
project. Construction emissions will be further reduced through emission equipment in an effort to fully
comply with Washington State emission standards. During the refueling process, CARB-certified vapor
recovery systems will minimize vapor release and odors.
3. Water
a. Surface Water [help]
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. [help]
Wetland delineations completed in 2017 and 2018 identified a Category II wetland (Wetland A) located on
the adjacent parcel to the east. In addition to Wetland A, previously completed wetland delineations
identify a Category III wetland (Wetland X) located to the south of the project site.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes,
please describe and attach available plans. [help]
The project will not be developed over any regulated surface water body.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or
wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. [help]
The project will propose to remain outside of the existing wetland. As such, no fill nor cut material will be
added/removed from the existing wetland.
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 7 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and
approximate quantities if known. [help]
The proposal will not require surface water withdrawals or diversions.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note the location on the site plan. [help]
FEMA's FIRM Map Panel No. 53033C1250F indicates that the subject site lies outside the 100-year
floodplain.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of
waste and anticipated volume of discharge. [help]
The project will not discharge waste materials into surface waters.
b. Ground Water
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general
description of the well, proposed uses, and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be
discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. [help]
Discharge to groundwater is not anticipated, pending final design of the project's stormwater management
system. Any surface runoff will initially be detained onsite and will likely be conveyed in a controlled
manner to the drainage system .
It is possible that excavation work may reveal deposits of groundwater below grade, dictating the need for
dewatering. Any dewatering will be completed on an as-needed basis and in a manner that is fully
compliant with applicable regulations, including obtaining any necessary dewatering permits.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any
(for example: domestic sewage; industrial containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. [help]
No waste material will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources.
c. Water runoff (including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include
quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. [help]
Stormwater runoff will be generated from both impervious and pervious surfaces on site. The run -on from
the developed property upstream of the site is negligible, as there is an existing stormwater system that
will capture the runoff before it enters the project site. Stormwater runoff will be collected by a series of
catch basins, discharged to a combined detention vault, treated by a Modular Wetland Water Quality Unit
and Oil/Water Separator vault, and then discharged to the public storm drainage system within Pacific
Highway South.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. [help]
The water quality improvements installed with this project will substantially limit the chance that waste
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 8 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
materials could enter ground or surface waters.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe.
The proposed project intends to keep the natural drainage patterns unchanged.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if
any:
Stormwater runoff will be mitigated for both runoff quality and quantity in accordance with the 2016 King
County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City of Federal Way addendum via a detention vault
and water quality treatment train.
4. Plants [help]
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: [help]
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
X shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
orchards, vineyards, or other permanent crops
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? [help]
The site is currently comprised of a forested canopy and shrub understory along the eastern property edge
within the wetland buffer. This vegetation will be retained without disturbance. Existing vegetation within
the interior of the existing development including trees and plantings will be removed and replaced with
new Type III and Type IV landscape areas. A preliminary landscape plan is enclosed with this submittal.
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. [help]
To the best of our knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered species existing on site or to be
found in the immediate vicinity.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if
any. [help]
Trees and plantings will be selected that are native to the Pacific Northwest and/or as specified by City
Code.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
No noxious weeds or invasive species have been identified on or near the site. Any identified noxious
weeds and invasive species on the site will be removed.
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 9 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
5. Animals
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site, or are known to be on or near
the site. Examples include: [help]
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: X
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. [help]
To the best of our knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered species living on site or to be found
in the immediate vicinity.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. [help]
The project site is located within the Pacific Flyway, a known route of migratory birds including waterfowl.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. [help]
No mitigation measures are required or proposed.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
To the best of our knowledge, there are no invasive animal species living on site or to be found in the
immediate vicinity.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's
energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. [help]
The primary source of energy will be electricity.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe.
[help]
No impacts have been identified that limit or restrict the use of solar energy on adjacent properties.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. [help]
Energy conservation will be achieved through design elements that fully comply with the current provisions
of Washington State Energy Code.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,
spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. [help]
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 10 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
None are routinely associated with service station uses on a regular or recurring basis; incidental exposure
to gasoline during refueling, the risk of fire, and the possibility of a fuel spill are potentially sources of
environmental hazards.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
To the best of our knowledge, the site does not contain any significant contamination from present or past
uses. Any contaminated soils or water will be remediated in accordance with Washington State
Department of Ecology requirements.
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This
includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in
the vicinity.
To the best of our knowledge, the site does not contain any hazardous chemicals or conditions that would
significantly affect project development and design. However, if any contamination from hazardous
materials are encountered, it will be remediated in accordance with Washington State Department of
Ecology requirements.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's
development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project.
Gasoline and diesel fuels will be stored within underground storage tanks for the operation of the service
station.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special services will be required. The level of emergency services (fire, police, medical) utilized would
be consistent with comparable developments of this size and type.
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any.
Special equipment designed to minimize the impact of failure or damage through accidents, system
protocols to establish and promote regular inspection and monitoring of facilities and equipment, plus
electronic monitoring systems which provide continual oversight of fuel systems and equipment.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)? [help]
The only identified source of noise in the immediate vicinity occurs within the surrounding road network
from vehicular traffic.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-
term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site. [help]
Short-term noise associated with construction activity will be limited to construction traffic and equipment.
The maximum noise levels should be expected to occur within the range between 57 and 89 dBA. These
construction noise impacts will be limited by City Code to certain hours of the day (typically starting at 7:00
a.m. and ending in the early evening hours on weekdays). All construction activity associated with the
project will be done in full compliance with City Code requirements.
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 11 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
Long-term noise impacts are expected to be relatively minor and limited to traffic on site. Noise levels are
not expected to exceed current ambient noise levels after project construction. Loading operations will be
regulated to the extent required by C ity Code.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: [help]
None are proposed.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby
or adjacent properties? If so, describe. [help]
The site is currently undeveloped. The proposal is not expected to affect any c urrent land uses on
adjacent properties.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much
agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the
proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax
status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? [help]
To the best of our knowledge, the project site has not been used as working farmlands or working forest
lands.
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business
operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If
so, how.
The proposed project will not affect or be affected by surrounding wor king farms or forest land normal
business operations.
c. Describe any structures on the site. [help]
Five (5) existing structures are identified on site including an approximate 2,933 -square foot building,
1,400-square foot building, 891-square foot building, 117-square foot shed, and 214-square foot shed.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? [help]
The five (5) existing structures identified will be demolished to accommodate the new improvements .
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? [help]
The subject property is located in the Commercial Enterprise (CE) zoning district.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? [help]
The current comprehensive plan designation of the subject property is Commercial Enterprise.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? [help]
This is not applicable.
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 12 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. [help]
Previous wetland delineations by the City identified a Category II wetland (Wetland A) located on the
adjacent parcel to the east. The standard buffer for Wetland A encroaches onto the site. In addition to
Wetland A, previously completed wetland delineations identify a Category III wetland (Wetland X) located
to the south of the project site. The City Code requires a 60-foot side standard buffer. A small portion of
the standard wetland buffer encroaches onto the project site.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? [help]
Following project completion, the development will likely employ between 15 and 25 employees. The
project does not include any residential components and no one will reside on the site following project
completion.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? [help]
With no residential component, there is no residential displacement.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. [help]
With no displacement impacts identified, no mitigation measures are required or proposed.
l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any. [help]
The proposed use is permitted within the zoning district and is subject to various levels of review to ensure
compatibility and compliance with all applicable codes.
m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any.
With no impacts to agricultural or forest lands identified, no mitigation measures are required or proposed.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing. [help]
The project proposal does not include any residential components. No housing units will be provided.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing. [help]
A single-family residence will be removed to accommodate the proposed improvements.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. [help]
No mitigation measures are required or proposed.
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 13 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior
building material(s) proposed? [help]
The proposed convenience store is approximately 19 height. The fueling facility canopy is 17 feet 6 inches
in height. The principal exterior materials for the convenience store will be Nichiha with brick. The canopy
will consist of metal fascia. The project will be designed to comply with all applicable architectural
standards as specified per City Code requirements.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? [help]
The project will be designed to comply with all applicable City setback and site clearance requirements.
No significant views of the immediate vicinity are expected to be altered or obstructed as a result of this
project.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. [help]
With no aesthetic impacts identified, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. Compliance with
existing design guidelines and standards reduces or controls any aesthetic impacts, which may otherwise
have occurred.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? [help]
The primary sources of light or glare resulting from the completed retail project will be produced from
exterior lighting fixtures and vehicle headlights during evening hours. The project will utilize fixtures that
help minimize the possibility of glare and/or spillover affecting adjacent properties.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? [help]
No issues related to lighting have been identified as safety hazard or visual obstruction.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? [help]
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any.
The project's mitigation of light or glare lies in the choice of exterior fixtures and their design. The use of
recessed and shielded wall fixtures will play a major role in reducing glare and spillover. The use of
landscaping including berms, planting beds, and a substantial number of trees will further minimize
potential for spillover.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? [help]
No recreational opportunities have been identified in the immediate vicinity.
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 14 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. [help]
The project will not displace any recreational uses.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any. [help]
No mitigation measures are required or proposed.
13. Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or
eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically
describe. [help]
The existing motel building was construction in 1947 according to the King County Assessor Records. To
the best of our knowledge, the existing building is not listed in any national, state, or local preservation
registers.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include
human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on
or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. [help]
None have been identified.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the
project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic
preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. [help]
No specific studies have been undertaken and no specific efforts aside from field observation have been
conducted to research the probability of cultural, historic, or architectural resources on site.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources.
Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
No mitigation measures are required or proposed.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access
to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. [help]
The project site is bound by public rights-of-way on two sides; S.W. 356th Street to the north and Pacific
Highway South to the west. The project proposes full access to the site from S.W. 356th Street and right-
in and right-out access onto Pacific Highway South.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what
is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? [help]
The project site is served by Pierce County Metro via Bus Route 500. A bus stop is included near the
southwest corner of the property within the public right-of-way.
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 15 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many
would the project or proposal eliminate? [help]
The completed project will provide surface parking for 21 vehicles. The existing surface parking in front of
the motel will be eliminated.
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle, or state
transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
[help]
The project does not propose any roadway improvements at this time.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe. [help]
The project will not have any involvement with, or impact upon, water, rail, or air transport services or
facilities.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate
when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and
non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? [help]
Based upon the 10th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the development would generate
approximately 125 new trips during the PM peak hours. A Traffic Concurrency Review Application has
been submitted for review.
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect, or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on
roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
The proposal will not interfere with, affect, or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest
products on roads or streets in the area.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. [help]
The project will be subject to payment of the City's standard traffic impact fees. No other measures are
proposed or required at this time.
15. Public services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection,
public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. [help]
The project will not result in an increased need for public safety services such as police and fire protection
beyond the typical service provided for a project of this scale.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. [help]
No mitigation measures are required or proposed.
16. Utilities
a. Underline/circle utilities currently available at the site: [help]
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 16 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
Electricity, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer are all available to serve the site.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. [help]
Preliminary research of utility as-built plans indicates that there is an existing sewer main that runs along
the west property line. The project proposes to connect to an existing sewer stub stemming from the
existing main within Pacific Highway South. Furthermore, as-built plans show an existing water main along
the same western property line of the project site. The project proposes to tap the existing main for the
domestic and irrigation service.
Lastly, natural gas and dry utilities (power, communications) are also existing along the site frontages. It is
likely that all utility connections will be made to existing infrastructure along Pacific Highway South .
The project will likely be served by the following utility purveyors:
Electric: Puget Sound Energy
Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy
Water: Lakehaven Utility District
Sanitary Sewer: Lakehaven Utility District
Telephone: CenturyLink
Refuse Service: Waste Management NW
Bulletin #050 – May 1, 2014 Page 17 of 17 20948.006_SEPA Checklist
C. SIGNATURE [HELP]
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Printed Name of Signee:
Position and Agency/Organization:
Date Submitted:
Nick Wecker
Senior Planner, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
6/3/20