Loading...
Final Committee Recommendation Memo To: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use & Transportation Committee From: Community Space Advisory Group (CSAG) Cc. Jim Ferrell Brian Davis Keith Niven Steve Groom Tanja Carter Sarah Bridgeford Date: 22 September 2023 Re: New City Hall & Community Space Background The Mayor formed the Community Space Advisory Group in May 2023 to provide a forum for a community discussion on the potential need for a new or larger City Hall; and, the merits and need for a new City-owned community space in the downtown area. The group met monthly from June thru September. The discussions included:  What makes for a memorable city  The vision for Downtown Federal Way  Community Space expectations  What makes for a successful Community Space  Why move City Hall  What makes for a successful City Hall  Funding Challenges and Potential  Bothell’s path to a new City Hall  Developing a recommendation for Council Evaluation Based on the conversations that occurred between the CSAG and staff, the CSAG agree with the following: 1. Community Space The City is growing and there are a number of community activities that are limited or not possible in Federal Way due to the lack of available space. It is also recognized the City has a number of existing financial obligations as well as existing unfunded capital projects. However, investing in spaces that serve and foster community activities is a vital component of a prosperous city and there is an opportunity before the Council that should not be missed. City facilities, including Dumas Bay and the Community Center are vital assets for the community, but they are not adequate in both size and diversity of uses to serve this growing City. In addition, the City’s vision for its Downtown as a civic hub includes Town Square Park and the to-be- 2 built Civic Plaza. There needs to also be an indoor Community space included of size to meet the growing community’s needs. 2. City Hall As the City looks to its future, the discussion of a new City Hall should consider a) the adequacy of the current facility to accommodate the needs of the growing City; and, b) the impact of having the City Hall buried in a business park has on the overall image and functionality for the City. Adequacy of Existing building The following discussion is focused on those departments and employees not located at the City’s Operation & Maintenance facility as the city has invested in a new facility for those municipal functions. The City purchased the current City Hall building in 2003. The population of Federal Way in 2003 was 86,000. The City had 293 staff at that time. The current population is 102,000. The City has 398 staff currently. The City is expected to reach 130,000 by 2044. City Hall does not currently have adequate space for the Police Department and Municipal Court downstairs. On the 2nd floor, City departments are out of space and currently repurposing storage space into usable office space. Lack of available conference rooms and public meeting spaces is an on-going issue. Accessing City Hall for those in the community without a private mode of transportation option is difficult as transit options are limited and there are few residents located within reasonable walking distance of the existing facility. The City has 4 choices in considering City Hall: 1) Take no action and continue to overcrowd the existing City Hall building. This option, although seemingly less costly, will adversely impact the City and working conditions for City staff. This will, in turn, negatively impact the City’s ability to recruit top candidates. This option does not address concerns over the community’s access to this facility and lack of public resources. 2) Purchase a 2nd City Hall to allow for part of City staff to remain and part to locate to another building. Although this might be a more affordable alternative, cities have found that splitting staff into multiple buildings creates an operational disfunction that negatively impacts the organization. 3) Fund an expansion of the existing City Hall. The current City Hall is 83,000 square feet. It is estimated the City should be considering a space of approximately 120,000 square feet to accommodate its future needs. 3 Whether or not structurally the existing building could be modified is unknown. To add approximately 40,000 sq ft to the existing building would represent an addition similar to that pictured to the left. In addition to removing parking for the addition, the new space would require significant modification to the existing structure and generate increased parking requirements resulting in the need to build a parking garage or to buy additional property to accommodate the parking need. 4) Fund the acquisition of a new building or space that would accommodate the City’s workforce. This option can be divided into 2 sub-options: 1) build a new City Hall that would be purpose-built for the City; or, 2) look for an existing, empty space of this size. Repurposing an existing office space to meet City needs would involve a significant tenant improvement and there are few choices of office buildings located in the City over 100,000 sf. Existing buildings of this size in the City include: the Weyerhaeuser headquarter building (337,000 sf), the Davita headquarter building (187,000 sf), or the Evergreen Corporate Center (113,000 sf). None of these existing buildings are located in the Downtown area. Having City Hall in Downtown The City is attempting to turn an underdeveloped and underutilized part of the City into its Downtown. Moving City Hall to this area would serve as a beacon for public involvement, community gatherings, and a catalyst for private investment in downtown businesses and community life. City halls exist in almost every city across America. They serve the same purpose in each place: they are portals through which the community interacts with local leaders and is a symbol of local identity and pride. Moving City Hall and its employees downtown immediately provides 300 shoppers and a lunch crowd that will support local businesses. The City has expressed a desire for the Downtown to be a mixed-use neighborhood in City, consisting of residences, retail and office uses. Given the current post-pandemic office market, it is unlikely the City will be able to lure office users to this area except for City Hall. City offices also tend to attract other office uses that interact with City services on a regular basis. Funding these Facilities Not considering 2 new, multi-million-dollar facilities, the City has a long list of existing, unfunded capital and maintenance obligations. Earlier this year, the City committed to the construction of an expanded Operations and Maintenance Facility, the cost of which is still being determined. There have been discussions about turfing fields at Celebration Park. City Hall needs a new roof. There are 2 questions that need to be asked: 1. Is a new Community Space a “need” or a “want”? addition 4 2. Is a new City Hall a “need” or a “want”? If either of these are “needs”, then what is their priority for the community? CSAG Recommendations 1. Community Space: The City incorporate language into the draft development agreement for TC3 that would allow for the construction of a 40,000± sf Community Space, subject to the City being able to secure funding for such a space. 2. Community Space: The City prioritize efforts to fund this space. 3. Community Space: Should funding be possible, that the City utilize a Request for Proposals (RFP) process to determine the occupant or occupants of the space. 4. City Hall: The City incorporate language into the draft development agreement for TC3 that would allow for the construction of a new City Hall, subject to the City being able to secure funding for such a space. 5. City Hall: Prior to determining the size of the City Hall, the City engage with a space planner to determine the appropriate size and configuration of the facility to ensure that it is optimal for City departments and the municipal court. 6. Community Space & City Hall: New City Hall downtown is a need. A new Community Space is also a need for a livable city. But, the Community Space is undefined at this time. The City should try to realize both spaces, and should pursue a public process to help define the size and use of the Community Space & explore options for the Council’s considerations. 5 6 7