The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUTC PKT 08-16-2004 MEETING AGENDA 1. 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 21, 2004 PUBUC COMMENT (3 minutes) 4. BUSINESS ITEMS A. B. C. D. E. F. 2004 Asphalt Overlay - Project Acceptance Revised Sound Transit TOO Agreement School Impact Fee Schedule Update City Center Access Study Briefing King County Transportation Funding Proposal Local Adoption of State Building Code Action Salloum/5 min Action Moseley/10 min Information Wang/tO min Action Zukowski/45 min Action Roe/20 min Information Martin/10 min 5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURN 6. Committee Members Jad< Dovey, Chair Eric Faison Michael Park City Staff Kathy McClung, Director, Community Development 5ervices E Tina Piety, Administrative Assistant 253-661-4105 G:ILUTCILUTC Agendas and Summaries 2oo4\August 16,2004, LUTC Agenda.doc " .. ':" ' "" ¡¡City of FederatWay ., ",,'.':, ","Oity:Cåunêil' '",' ".'; ;':':""',"'>""""" ',' 'I'" ,:' ,:, " " , Land us:~rrran$p)rtä:tion' Committee ",",;::":",::,~;,:,;;:""I",:.,;",,,':"J":',:,!j","" " .. , ' >?b".,..;./tt, ,,' " jùne:'2~ ):2004 , ,": ',", ,{., 5:~'9~p.in. , ; "" ",', , ':;:':y,~;:::;¡.: d" , "j' .. , :¡ " ,'" ':' >, ,PitY:Håll Council Chambør~ ,". ," MEETING MINUTES In attendance: Committee Members Jack Dovey, Chair, Eric Faison and Michael Park; Deputy Mayor Linda Kachmar, Public Works Director Cary Roe; Deputy City Attorney Karen Kirkpatrick; Public Works Deputy Director Ken Miller, Community Development Services Deputy Director Greg Fewins; Surface Water Manager Paul Bucich; Surface Water Engineer Jeff Wolf, and Administrative Assistant Krystal Kelsey. 1. CALL TO ORDER . Chair Dovey called the meeting to order at 5:33 pm. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The summary minutes of the May 24, 2004, meeting was approved as presented. 3. PUBUC COMMENT None. 4. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Grant Funding Application for Transportation Improvement Projects (South 3411" Street at SR 161 Intersection Improvements) - Mr. Salloum presented the staff report to the Committee. Couneilmember Faison requested additional information about the scope of the project. Mr. Salloum explained that the project would add an additional left turn from South 348th to SR 161 (Enchanted Parkway), a right turn lane from SR 161 (Enchanted Parkway) to SR 18, and a dedicated right turn lane from South 348th to SR 161 (Enchanted Parkway). Mr. Salloum further explained that the amount currently unfunded is $500,000 to $950,000 and will be reflected in the 2005/2006 budget. The project is likely to receive a high score for funding; however, funding is very limited at this time. The application deadline is in August with a possible decision in December. Couneilmember Faison inquired about grant funding for S 317th & 21st Avenue South City Center grid streets. Mr. Roe stated that staff would evaluate these potential projects for future grant suitability. However, it is necessary to match the grant criteria with the project. Mr. Roe stated that staff annually conducts an intensive self-scoring process on all projects considered for grant funding. The Committee mlslc to place the staff recommendation on the July 6, 2004 City Council Consent Agenda. B. 2005 Street Sweeping Service - Authorization to Bid - Mr. Salloum presented the staff report to the Committee. Mr. Roe addressed the Committee and explained that because of potential cuts to the 2005/2006 budget, staff will structure the bid with schedules to be awarded as funding allows. Chair Dovey inquired about the rationale of sending a project out to bid with a possible increase in service costs. Mr. Salloum explained that several reasons prompt sending the project out to bid, including the City's policy of bidding on work at least every three years, and to also allow for awarding the contract in schedules. Depending on the 2005/2006 budget, the contract's proposed scope of work may be awarded in full or in part. The Committee mlslc to place the staff recommendation on the July 6, 2004 City Couneil Consent Agenda. C. 2005 Landscape Maintenance Service - Authorization to Bid - Mr. Salloum presented the staff report to the Committee. The Committee mlslc to place the staff recommendation on the July 6, 2004 City Couneil Consent Agenda. D. RFB 04-112 Sewer Extension Bellacarino Woods - Bid Award -- Mr. Bucich presented the staff report to the Committee. The Committee m/s/c to place the staff recommendation on the July 6, 2004 City Council Consent Agenda. E. Proposed Modification to Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat: Mrs. Robert Stiers spoke in opposition to the project, and read aloud a letter originally submitted to the City in June 2001. Ms. Stiers asked that her letters become a part of the project file. In summa~ the Stiers' primary concerns are water run-off and flooding on their property. Chris Austin, Trinity Land Development, spoke in favor of the project. Mr. Austin referenced a benefit with the buffer, less truck traffic, and improved land use. Robert laBounty spoke in opposition, noting grading activities, tree loss, property impacts to neighbors and the extreme sloping of the property. Mr. Fewins presented the staff report to the Cort1mittee. The Committee inquired about the residents' concerns of flooding, etc. Mr. Faison answered that the plan is in compliance and has an improved runoff and vegetation plan. To the east of property, the native grown protection area of 80 - 50 feet is a "no touch" area. Mr. Miller addressed the Committee concerning the flooding and noted that no problems were identified all the way to the golf course ponds. However, Mr. Miller said that staff would go over the TIR again to make sure nothing was overlooked. Furthermore, Mr. Miller will speak directly to the Stiers to learn more about the problems they are experiencing. This project has been designed in accordance with standards; in theory storm water will be detained by the pond and tightline. Again, staff will look closely at the Stiers property. If flooding occurs after the project is complete, the property owners will be protected by the two-year maintenance period. Also, the engineer who designs the project is personally liable for seven years. Chair Dovey inquired about protection of the open area. Mr. Fewins answered that the tract language will establish whether the land will be held privately or publicly; any change to that status would require Council action. The Committee m/s/c to place the staff recommendation on the July 6, 2004 City Council Consent Agenda. 5. FUTURE MEETING The next scheduled meeting is July 19, 2004. 6. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 6:23 p.m. G:ILUTCILUTC Agendas and Summaries 2004\June 21, 2004, LUTC Minutes,doc CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: August 16, 2004 TO: Land Use/Transportation Committee FROM: t anager '~\L k, Deputy City Attome)Ji VIA: SUBJECT: Revised Sound Transit TOD Agreement In March 2004 the City Council directed staffto negotiate revisions to the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Agreement that had previously been presented to Council. The Council identified seven areas in which they desired revisions. The requested revisions and the negotiated response from Sound Transit are summarized below, and a revised TOD Agreement is attached for Council action. A. Council Requested Modifications to TOD Agreement 1. Sound Transit shall make available public (non-transit) parking within the proposed parking garage at no cost to any party. Original TOO: There is no provision for non-transit use of the garage facility. Revised TOO: Sound Transit makes parking available within the parking garage through market value leases to local businesses and/or to the City for a limited lease period. Once the lease period is established, Sound Transit may tenninate the lease with 90 days notice. Leases must be approved by the Federal Transit Administration. 2. Sound Transit shall perfonn the following: a. Design, construct and implement retail or other TOD uses concurrent with the occupancy ofthe parking structure or within a mutually agreed timeframe (west TOD). Original TOD: Sound Transit has 18 months from Certificate of Occupancy (CO) to secure a developer and the developer has 5 years to construct the TOD development. If either time line is not met, the west TOD property will be conveyed to the City at no cost to the City. Revised TOD: No change to the Current TOD agreement. b. Develop the approximate one-acre east of the parking structure with a Multi-story development. If Sound Transit does not implement a TOD use on Revised Sound Transit TOD Agreement LUTC Staff Report August 16, 2004 Page 1 of 4 said property within a mutually agreed upon time frame, it will transfer.the , property to the City at no cost. If it is not possible for the City to develop the east property within a reasonable time frame after the transfer of the property, the City at its discretion could develop a pedestrian plaza. Original TOD: Sound Transit has 18 months trom CO to secure a developer for the east TOD and the developer has 5 years to construct the TOD development. If either timeline is not met the City has the option to purchase the east TOD property at Sound Transit's original purchase price. Revised TOD: The same time trames apply. If either timeline is not met Sound Transit will convey the property to the City at no cost for a period of 7 years for the purpose of securing a developer for a TOO development. If, after the seven-year period, a developer has not been identified, the City, at its option, may convey the property back to Sound Transit or the City may purchase the property at fair market value. If the City desires to use the Property for non- TOD use during the 7 year period, it may purchase the property at fair market value. 3. Sound Transit shall complete 21st Avenue South grid road trom South 316th to South 320th to assist in visibility and viability of onsite TOD as well as City Center economic development. Original TOD: There is no provision for the 21 st A venue South grid road. Revised TOD: Sound Transit will contribute a capped, lump sum payment of$l million towards the completion of 21 st Ave. South street improvement project. Sound Transit's contribution relieves Sound Transit and the TOD developer of any further investment in 21 st Ave. South, including any future traffic signalization. 4. Sound Transit shall construct South 31 ih grid road trom 21 st to 20th A venues South to assist in visibility and viability of onsite TOD as well as City Center economic development. Original TOD: There is no provision for South 317th grid road. Revised TOD: There is no provision for South 31 ih grid road. 5. Sound Transit shall participate in a pedestrian bridge component with properties to the north and/or south to provide pedestrian connectivity to transit and other City Center uses. Original TOD: There is no provision for a pedestrian bridge from the transit center. Revised TOD: Sound Transit agrees to work with the City and/or private property interest in exploring the concept of a pedestrian bridge to the parking garage under certain conditions. 6. Sound Transit shall dedicate experienced staff resources to this TOD project. Staff with expertise in transit development, leasing, and other property management skills will assist in the success of this project. Original TOD: There is no provision for Sound Transit to dedicate staffto this TOO project. Revised TOD: Sound Transit agrees to make available experienced staff resources to the project. 7. Sound Transit should provide a night management security plan. Original TOO: There is no provision for Sound Transit to provide a night management security plan. Revised TOD: Sound Transit agrees to provide a night management security plan for the transit center. B. Other Modifications I. The City will provide the remaining budget and funding for the design, environmental review, permitting, ROW acquisition (if necessary), construction and construction management of 21 st Avenue South improvement project. 2. The City agrees to waive any further development fees related 21 5t Ave. 3. The City agrees to waive standard City permit fees for the TOD projects. 4. The City may reduce the parking requirement on the TOD projects in recognition that many will be using the transit center or ST will dedicate parking in the garage for TOD use. 5. The City agrees to temporary, rather than pennanent, irrigation for the TOD properties. 6. The City agrees to assist with the groundbreaking and ribbon-cutting activities for the transit center and 31 th HOY access projects. 7. The City agrees that if the TOO project is consistent with the City's Planned Action SEP A that the developer will not be required to go through further SEP A review. 8. The City agrees to convert the current right-of-way use permit along S. 316th to an easement for as long as the property is used as a Transit Center. 9. lfthe East TOD Property is conveyed to the City, the City will provide an easement for access between the East TOD Property and the Transit Center. OJNNJ.lfft ~ Cl:rtmi1tU Mtt 6VL ' Staff requests that the ommittee fo ard the proposed revised TOD Agreement to full City Council for placement on e Augu 24, 2004 City Council agenda, with a recommendation for approval and authorization ~ the ity Manager to execute the Agreement. Committee Chair Committee Me APPROVAL BY COM K:\SoLlnd Transit\TOD Agreement 2004\LUTC Staff Report 08.16.04 Committee Recommendation: I move the proposed revised TaD Agreement to full City Council for placement on the August 24, 2004 City Council agenda, with a recommendation for approval and authorization for the City Manager to execute the Agreement as amended by the Committee to delete "north end of the" on page 5, line l. APPROVAL BY COMMITTEE: . AGREEMENT BETWEEN CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AT THE FEDERAL WAY TRANSIT CENTER THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2004 by and between the CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY ("Sound Transit") and the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ("City"), a municipal corporation, (hereinafter collectively, the "Parties"), regarding the development of a transit center project ("Project"). RECIT ALS WHEREAS, Sound Transit is a duly organized regional transit authority existing under Chapters 81.104 and 81.112 RCW and has all powers necessary to implement a high capacity transportation system and has the power to contract pursuant to RCW 39.33.050; and WHEREAS, the City is a municipal corporation organized under Chapter 35A RCW and has all powers necessary to supply municipal services commonly or conveniently rendered by cities and towns; and WHEREAS, the Parties have authority under RCW 39.34 to enter into an interlocal agreement to jointly and cooperatively exercise their powers and under RCW 39.33 to dispose of real property; and WHEREAS, central Puget Sound area voters approved local funding for Sound Move, Sound Transit's ten-year regional transit plan and such plan includes light rail, commuter rail, and regional express buslhigh occupancy vehicle systems that will be integrated with local transit systems; and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2002, Sound Transit submitted a master land use application for development of the Federal Way Transit Center, an Essential Public Facility/Class 1, which includes a transit platfonn with up to 14 bus bays and bus layover areas, a parking garage for up to 1,200 stalls on up to five levels, a pedestrian bridge between the transit platfonn and parking garage, passenger amenities, roadway Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way Page I For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center improvements, landscaping and public art, application number 02-105-346, hereafter the "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Project is located in the City on approximately seven acres of property at the southwest comer of South 316th Street and 23rd Avenue South and legally described in Exhibit "A", attached and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, on December 23, 2002, the City deemed the Project application complete pursuant to Federal Way City Code ("FWCC" or "City Code") 22-434; and WHEREAS, on September 26, 2001, a NEP A Environmental Assessment ("EA") was issued for the Project and Sound Transit, as the lead agency, adopted the EA and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance ("DNS") on March 6, 2002, and this determination was subsequently upheld on appeal by the King County Superior Court on March 17, 2003; and WHEREAS, the City approved the Project in a final decision issued by the Federal Way City Council on November 18, 2003 as indicated in Resolution No. 03-404; and WHEREAS, pursuant to FWCC 22-1, the Project is classified as an Essential Public Facility/Class I (regional transportation facility/transit center) and is, therefore, subject to the review criteria described in FWCC 22-946.1 (b) and is not subject to the specific regulations described in the underlying City Center-Core zone; and WHEREAS, Sound Transit and the City executed an agreement on July 9, 2001 as filed with the City under AG 01-99, whereby Sound Transit agreed, in part, to voluntarily design the Project to provide an opportunity for transit oriented development ("TOO") consistent with applicable policies and regulations of Sound Transit, the Federal Transit Administration, and the City; and WHEREAS, the Sound Transit Board of Directors has adopted TOD policies with Motions No. 98-25 and M99-60, encouraging the development of transit supportive development at transit hubs; and WHEREAS, consistent with its voluntary commitment to provide future TOD development opportunities, Sound Transit identified "potential future transit oriented development" areas on the Project site plan; and WHEREAS, the Parties recognize that the 2151 Avenue South Street hnprovement Project and certain other -development incentives would contribute to the likely success of TOD development adjacent to the Project; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to clarify their respective commitments for future TOO adjacent to the Project site by this Agreement and acknowledge that any future TaD that may occur adjacent to the Project site will be evaluated separately from the Project Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way Page 2 For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center application process for appropriate pennits and environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act and is not a part ofthe current review process for the Project. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants herein contained in this Agreement, Sound Transit and the City agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1.0 DEFINITIONS 1.1 East TOD Property: That area as depicted on Exhibit "B" consisting of approximately 30,834 square feet and intended for future TOD uses. 1.2 West TOD Property: That area as depicted on Exhibit "B" consisting of approximately 20,669 square feet and intended for future TOD uses. 1.3 TOD Properties: Refers to the East and West TOD Property collectively. Transit Oriented Development ("TOD"): In the context of this Agreement, the tenn TOD represents development consistent with Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1.4 2.0 2.1 RESPO NSIBILITIES Sound Transit Responsibilities A. Sound Transit shall design and construct the Project consistent with the final plans and approvals issued by the City to allow development of future TOD opportunities on the TOD Properties and pursuant to applicable City Code requirements. B. Sound Transit shall exert its best efforts, in consultation with the City, to obtain a qualified developer(s) who will develop the TOD Properties within five (5) years of occupancy of the Project, consistent with Sound Transit's adopted policies for TOD development. In the event that Sound Transit detennines, in its sole judgement, that a qualified TOD developer cannot be obtained through these good faith efforts, Sound Transit shall prepare and issue a Request For Proposals ("RFP"), at its sole expense ,md in consultation with the City, for development of the TOD Properties consistent with all applicable federal, state and local policies and regulations and at least twelve (12) months prior to the anticipated occupancy of the Project. Sound Transit shall, within eighteen months of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, (1) secure a commitment from a qualified Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way Page 3 For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center c. D. developer, who wíll agree to develop the TaD Properties within five (5) years of occupancy of the Project; or (2) convey the TaD Properties pursuant to Section 2.2 of this Agreement. If requested by Sound Transit, the City shall serve as lead agency for purposes of managing the RFP process. In conjunction with construction of the Project, Sound Transit shall design and construct utilities and pedestrian connections within the Project property in such a manner so as to allow future utility and pedestrian connections to the TaD Properties consistent with the final plans as approved by the City. E. In conjunction with the construction of the Project, Sound Transit shall prepare and submit a landscape plan for the TaD Properties consistent with Project Landscape Standards attached as Exhibit "D". The City shall review and approve the landscape plan expeditiously and Sound Transit shall implement the approved landscape plan pursuant to City Code as provided in the final approval issued by the City by installing the approved landscaping and improvements within 45 days of City approval, or some other timeframe as mutually agreed between the Parties. F. Sound Transit shall contribute a lump sum payment of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) to the 21 st Avenue South Street Improvement Project (21S1 Ave. Project). Sound Transit's contribution shall be paid to the City immediately upon fulfillment of the following conditions by the City; (a) completion of SEP A review, (b) acquisition or control of all property required for the 21 sl Ave Project, and ( c) all required pennits have issued for the 21 sl Ave. Project. Sound Transit shall complete timely review of all 21 sl Ave. Project SEP A documentation. Sound Transit's contribution shall relieve Sound Transit and the TaD Properties of any further investment in 21 st Avenue South, including any future traffic signalization or fees. G. If in its sole discretion Sound Transit detennines that certain parking stalls in the parking garage are not necessary for successful operation of the Project, Sound Transit shall make parking in the Project parking garage available to local businesses and the City through market value leases for limited lease periods. In such an event, Sound Transit may reserve the right to tenninate the lease(s) upon not less than 90 days written notice to the Lessee(s). The parties acknowledge that any lease for parking in the Project parking garage is subject to approval by the Federal Transit Administration. Sound Transit agrees to cooperate with the City and/or private property owner/developer to facilitate the development of a pedestrian bridge to the Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way Page 4 For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center H. north-end of the Project parking garage. Sound Transit shall grant access easements to the Project if such a pedestrian bridge proposal is viable and will be fully fun~ed either by the City or by a third party who agrees to fully fund all costs associated with such a pedestrian bridge including design, pennitting, construction and maintenance. In the event that the number of parking stalls within the Project garage would be reduced to accommodate the pedestrian bridge proposal, Sound Transit shall be entitled to compensation for such a loss in parking. Sound Transit reserves the right to review and reject or approve any particular proposaL Sound Transit's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 1. Sound Transit shall provide experienced staff to work with the City in the development of the TOD. J. Sound Transit shall provide a night management security plan to the City for the Project. 2.2 Conveyance of TOD Properties A. West TaD property In the event that Sound Transit is not able to secure a commitment from a qualified developer within eighteen (18) months of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, who will agree to develop the West TaD Property within five (5) years of occupancy of the Project, on tenus and conditions acceptable to Sound Transit in its sole judgment, or the developer does not commence construction of the TaD on the West TOD Property within five (5) years of occupancy of the Project, Sound Transit shall convey the West TOD Property to the City consistent with all applicable federal, state, and local policies and regulations for such conveyances, the tenus of this Agreement, and for valuable consideration in the fonn of the City's assurance that any future development of the West TaD Property will be consistent with the definition of TOD in this Agreement. Sound Transit shall retain pennanent utility, access, and signage easements over across and through the West TaD Property as necessary for Sound Transit's continued use and enjoyment of the Project property. B. East TaD Property In the event that Sound Transit detennines within eighteen (18) months of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Project that it is not able to secure a commitment ITom a qualified developer, who will agree to develop the East TOD Property within five (5) years of occupancy of the Project on tenus and conditions acceptable to Sound Transit in its sole Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 5 judgment, or the developer does not commence construction of the TOD on the East TOD Property within five (5) years of occupancy of the Project, Sound Transit shall convey the East TOD Property to the City consistent with all applicable federal, state, and local policies and regulations for such conveyances, the tenus of this Agreement, and for valuable consideration in the form of the City's assurance that any future development of the East TOD Property will be consistent with the definition ofTOD in this Agreement. The City shall have seven (7) years from the time of the conveyance to develop a TOD project on the East TOD Property. The City agrees to consult with Sound Transit's Chief Executive Officer, or designee, when reviewing proposed projects and no City-led project shall proceed unless he or she concurs with the City that the proposed project is consistent with the definition of TOD in this Agreement which concurrence shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. If the City is unable to develop a TOD project that Sound Transit agrees is consistent with the definition of TOD in this Agreement within seven (7) years of the conveyance to the City, the City shall either (1) retain ownership of the East TOD Property and pay Sound Transit the full market value of the property as determined by a mutually selected certified appraiser, less the value of permanent utility, access, and signage easements over, across and through the East TOD Property necessary for Sound Transit's continued use and enjoyment of the Project property as mutually determined by the Parties, or (2) transfer the East TOD Property back to Sound Transit at no cost to Sound Transit. In the event the City desires to develop the East TOD Property in a manner that is not consistent with the definition of TOD in this Agreement within seven (7) years of conveyance to the City, the City shall pay Sound Transit the full market value of the property as determined by a mutually selected certified appraiser, less the value of permanent utility, access, and signage easements over, across and through the East TOD Property necessary for Sound Transit's continued use and enjoyment of the Project property as mutually determined by the Parties. c. The Parties agree that any development that is allowed to occur on the TOD Properties shall be consistent with the definition of TOD as described in Exhibit "C" to this Agreement and will assure that any conveyances shall be made subject to this requirement. The Parties further agree that if a proposed TOD project is consistent with the City's Planned Action SEP A, no additional SEP A review shall be required for the TOD project. D. Notwithstanding any other section of this Agreement, the Parties agree that Sound Transit shall not be required to convey the TOD Properties to the City until eighteen (18) months after the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the City for the Project. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 6 2.3 City Responsibilities A. The City shall be responsible for the design, management and construction of the 21 sl Ave. Project. The City shall act as the lead agency for SEP A review. The City shall be responsible for property acquisition and pennitting. Sound Transit's contribution of One Million Dollars to the 21 Sl Ave. Project shall relieve Sound Transit and/or the TOD developer of any further investment in 21 sl A venue South, including any future traffic signalization or fees. The City agrees to coordinate with Sound Transit on the design of 21 sl Ave. Project and provide Sound Transit an opportunity to review and approve the design to ensure that the 21 sl Ave. Project does not interfere with the smooth operation of the Project. During construction, the City shall use its best efforts to reduce construction activity during peak commute hours and provide traffic control designed to minimize the impact on transit operations. B. In recognition of Sound Transit's One Million Dollar contribution to the 21 sl Ave. Project, the City shall not require payment of the City's standard pennit fees for development of the TOD properties. This shall not include non-City or non-standard pennit fees (i.e. fire district, school district, variance or expedited review fees). The City shall consider the number of people accessing the TOD via transit when detennining the parking requirements for the TOD projects. Parking requirements for the TOD projects may be reduced, in recognition of those using the Project parking garage, or waived if Sound Transit dedicates sufficient parking in the Project parking garage to the TOD projects. c. The City shall assist Sound Transit in the planning and implementation of the ground-breaking and ribbon-cutting activities for the Federal Way HaV Access/S. 31 th and Federal Way Transit Center Projects. D. In the event that Sound Transit conveys either of the TOD Properties to the City pursuant to Section 2.2, the City agrees to provide an easement in substantially the fonn attached as Exhibit "E" for unimpeded access between the TaD properties and the Transit Center to preserve the physical and functional relationship between the properties. E. Immediately upon execution of this Agreement, the City shall convey to Sound Transit a pedestrian amenities easement substantially in the [onn attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit "F". Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 7 2.4 Additional Agreements The Parties agree to make every reasonable effort to cooperate in good faith with each other to negotiate and execute such additional agreements as may be necessary to complete the TaD Property conveyances described in this Agreement. 3.0 LEGAL RELATIONS The City and Sound Transit shall comply, and to the best of their respective abilities shall ensure, that their respective employees, agents, consultants and representatives comply with all federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances applicable to the work and services to be perfonned by each party under this Agreement. In perfonning work and services hereunder, the City and its employees, agents, consultants and representatives shall be acting on behalf of the City and shall not be deemed or construed to be employees or agents of Sound Transit in any manner whatsoever. Likewise, in perfonning work and services hereunder, Sound Transit and its employees, agents, consultants and representatives shall be acting on behalf of Sound Transit and shall not be deemed or construed to be employees or agents of the City in any manner whatsoever. Neither the City nor Sound Transit shall hold itself out as, nor claim to bean officer or employee of the other by reason hereof and will not make any claim, demand, or application to or for any right or. privilege applicable to an officer or employee of the other. The City shall be solely responsible for any claims for wages or compensation by City employees, agents, and representatives, including consultants, and save and hold Sound Transit hannless therefrom; Sound Transit shall be solely responsible for any claims for wages or compensation by Sound Transit employees, agents, and representatives, including consultants, and save and hold the City harmless therefrom. To the maximum extent pennitted by law, the City agrees to indemnify and hold hannless Sound Transit and its officers, officials, employees and/or agents, from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, losses, costs, penalties and damages of whatsoever kind or nature to the extent arising out of, in connection with, or incident to any work or services required or contemplated to be perfonned by the City under this Agreement, and for any failure to satisfy the City's contractual obligations under this Agreement, except to the extent caused by the negligence of Sound Transit. The City further agrees to assume the defense of Sound Transit and its officers, officials, and employees, with legal counsel acceptable to Sound Transit, which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld, in all legal or claim proceedings arising out of, in connection with, or incident to such work or services, and the City shall pay all defense expenses, including attorneys' fees, expert fees, and expenses and costs (collectively "defense costs") incurred directly or indirectly on account of such litigation or claims, and the City shall satisfy any judgment rendered in connection therewith. The City may settle any suit, claim, action, loss, cost, penalty, or damages, subject to the approval of Sound Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way Page 8 For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Transit, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, if such settlement completely and forever extinguishes any and all liability of Sound Transit. In the event of litigation between the Parties to enforce the rights under this Section, reasonable attorney fees shall be allowed to the prevailing party. THE CITY'S INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATION HEREIN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, ALL. CLAIMS AGAINST SOUND TRANSIT BY AN EMPLOYEE OR FORMER EMPLOYEE OF THE CITY OR ITS CONSULTANT, AND, AFTER MUTUAL NEGOTIATION WITH SOUND TRANSIT, THE CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVES ALL IMMUNITY AND LIMIT A TION ON LIABILITY UNDER ANY INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE ACT, INCLUDING TITLE 51 RCW, OTHER WORKER'S COMPENSATION ACT, DISABILITY BENEFIT ACT, OR OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ACT OF ANY JURISDICTION THAT WOULD OTHER WISE BE APPLICABLE IN THE CASE OF SUCH CLAIM. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Sound Transit agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, employees and/or agents, from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, losses, costs, penalties and damages of whatsoever kind or nature to the extent arising out of, in connection with, or incident to any work or services required or contemplated to be performed by Sound Transit under this Agreement, and for any failure to satisfy Sound Transit's contractual obligations with respect to the Project and/or under this Agreement, except to the extent caused by the negligence of the City. Sound Transit further agrees to assume the defense of the City and its officers, officials, and employees, with legal counsel acceptable to the City, which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld, in all legal or claim proceedings arising out of, in connection with, or incident to such work or services, and Sound Transit shall pay all defense expenses, including attorneys' fees, expert fees, and expenses and costs (collectively "defense costs") incurred directly or indirectly on account of such litigation or claims, and Sound Transit shall satisfy any judgment rendered in connection therewith. Sound Transit may settle any suit, claim, action, loss, cost, penalty, or damages, subject to the approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, if such settlement completely and forever extinguishes any and all liability of the City. In the event of litigation between the Parties to enforce the rights under this Section, reasonable attorney fees shall be allowed to the prevailing party. SOUND TRANSIT'S INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGA TION HEREIN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY BY AN EMPLOYEE OR FORMER EMPLOYEE OF SOUND TRANSIT OR ITS CONSULTANT, AND, AFTER MUTUAL NEGOTIATION WITH SOUND TRANSIT, SOUND TRANSIT EXPRESSLY WAIVES ALL IMMUNITY AND LIMITATION ON LIABILITY UNDER ANY INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE ACT, INCLUDING TITLE 51 RCW, OTHER WORKER'S COMPENSATION ACT, DISABILITY BENEFIT ACT, OR OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ACT OF ANY JURISDICTION THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE APPLICABLE IN THE CASE OF SUCH CLAIM. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 9 4.0 DISPUTE RESOLUTION Sound Transit and the City will work collaboratively to resolve disagreements arising trom activities perfonned under this Agreement. Disagreements will be resolved promptly and at the lowest level of hierarchy. The services of a mediator may be used to assist with resolution. The following is a guide intended to resolve the maximum number of issues at the lowest organizational leveL 4.1 A. The Designated Representatives, as identified in this Agreement, shall communicate regularly to discuss the status of the task to be perfonned and to resolve any issues or disputes related to the successful perfonnance of this Agreement. The Designated Representatives will cooperate in providing staff support to facilitate the perfonnance of this Agreement and the resolution of any issues or disputes arising during the tenn of this Agreement. B. Each Designated Representative shall notify the others in writing of any problem or dispute that the Designated Representative believes should be resolved. The Designated Representatives shall meet within five (5) business days of receiving the written notice in an attempt to resolve the dispute. C. In the event the Designated Representatives cannot resolve the dispute, the Sound Transit Director of Regional Express or his/her designee and the City's Director of Community Development Services or his/her designee shall meet and engage in good faith negotiations to resolve the dispute. D. In the event the Directors cannot resolve the dispute, the Sound Transit Executive Director or designee and the City Manager or designee shall meet and engage in good faith negotiations to resolve the dispute. The Parties agree that they shall have no right to seek relief under this Agreement in a court of law until and unless each of these procedural steps is exhausted. 5.0 5.1 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISION Termination Unless extended by mutual written agreement, this Agreement shall tenninate upon satisfactory completion of all the responsibilities described in this Agreement, or upon conveyance of the TOD Properties as described in this Agreement, whichever shall occur last. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 10 5.2 Notice All notices or requests required or pennitted under this Agreement shall be in writing, shall be personally delivered or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or by facsimile transmission and shall be deemed given three (3) days following the date when mailed or on the date when delivered or faxed (provided the fax machine has issued a printed confirmation of receipt). All notices or requests shall be sent to the City and Sound Transit's Designated Representatives addressed as follows: To the City: City of Federal Way Attn: Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services 33325 - 8th Avenue South P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, W A 98063-9718 (253) 835-2610 (253) 661-4129 Address: Phone: Fax: With a Copy to: City of Federal Way Attn: Pat Richardson, City Attorney 33325 - 8th Avenue South P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-2570 (253) 835-2569 Address: Phone: Fax: To Sound Transit: Sound Transit Attn: Dan Eder, Project Manager 401 S. Jackson Street Seattle, W A 98104-2826 (206) 398-5024 (206) 398-5215 Address: Phone: Fax: Each Party shall notify the other, in writing, of a change in the Party's respective Designated Representative. 5.3 Assignment Neither Sound Transit nor the City shall assign any interest, obligation, or benefit in this Agreement or transfer any interest in the same, whether by assignment or novation, without prior written consent of the other; provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due to the City from Sound Transit under this Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Notice of Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way Page 11 For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center any such assignment of claims for money due or to become due to the City shall be furnished promptly to Sound Transit. 5.4 Recording This Agreement shall be recorded with the Real Property Records Division of the King County Records and Elections Department and shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors in interest. 5.5 Governing Law This Agreement and all provisions hereof shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws ofthe State of Washington. 5.6 Severability If any of the tenus or provisions of this Agreement are detenuined to be invalid, such invalid tenD or provision shall not affect or impair the remainder of this Agreement, but such remainder shall continue in full force and effect to the same extent as though the invalid tenD or provision were not contained herein. 5.7 Warranty of Right to Enter into Agreement The City and Sound Transit each warrant that it has the right to enter into this Agreement and that the person signing this Agreement has authority to bind such person's respective entity. 5.8 Exhibits All exhibits referenced in and attached to this Agreement are incorporated herein, except to the extent otherwise provided herein. 5.9 Entire Agreement This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to all matters referenced herein. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 12 CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY ("SOUND TRANSIT") Name Title Dáte Approved as to form: Sound Transit Legal Counsel CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: David H. Moseley, City Manager Date Attest: N. Christine Green, CMC Approved as to form: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson K:\Sound Transit\TOD Agreement 2004\Revised TOO Agreement 8.16.04 Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 13 Exhibit A Existing Parcel Legal Description: KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT 1802027 Tax Parcel No. 092104-9021 Lot I of King County Short Plat No. 182027, according to short plat recorded March 14, 1984 under Recording No. 8403140752, in King County, Washington. Tax Parcel No. 092104-9057 Lot 2 of King County Short Plat No. 182027, according to short plat recorded March 14, 1984 under Recording No. 8403140752, in King County, Washington. KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT 480019R Tax Parcel No. 92104-9176 Lot 2 of King County Short Plat No. 480019R, according to short plat recorded April 28, 1980 under Recording No. 8004280455, in King County, Washington; Except that portion conveyed to the City of Federal Way, for road, by deed recorded under Recording No. 20001215001690. Except that portion conveyed to the City of Federal Way, a Washington Municipal Corporation, under statutory warranty deed recorded December 18, 2002, under Recording No. 20021218002306. Tax Parcel No. 092104-9298 Lot 3 of King County Short Plat No. 480019R, according to short plat recorded April 28, 1980 under Recording No. 8004280455, in King County, Washington; Except that portion conveyed to the City of Federal Way by deeded recorded under Recording No. 20010323001260. Tax Parcel No. 092104-9299 Lot A of King County Short Plat No. 480019R, according to short plat recorded April 28, 1980 under Recording No. 8004280455, in King County, Washington. Except that portion conveyed to the City of Federal Way by deed recorded under Recording No. 20000807001155. Also except that portion conveyed to the City of Federal Way by deed recorded under Recording No. 20020724000972. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 14 -- -----. - ßxnlOIt IS "" East and West TOO Properties --.-.--- ----------~ ¡ I ----;. .---......- 1: ~ g ~ C; VI 13", g:~ -- ð~ ~ to- ~ x~ .~ ~< ~, ~F ~ ....>- i7>~ v ~$: ~ -<;..i ~ ~< ¡. ..3 R e::> ~:..s' ~~ ,.. i ~ Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 15 Exhibit C Guidelines for Transit Oriented Development This exhibit provides a definition of the term "transit oriented development" (TOD) for the TOD Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Federal Way. Transit Oriented Development Definition: Public and private development that supports and promotes transit use. Development projects should strive to enhance the effectiveness oftransit, and be related physically or functionally to transit. To be considered TOD, development should address all three key components: location, use and design. . Location - Development that occurs within walking distance of major transit service. Generally, this means development occurring within !j,¡ mile of any light rail station, or V<i mile of any bus stop with multiple routes and/or frequent service. [For example, under this definition, development occurring within V<i mile of the Federal Way Transit Center/So 317th project would satisfy the location component. ] . Land Use - Types of development that support and promote transit use. Development that creates housing, jobs, shopping, community services or recreational opportunities could qualify as acceptable use. Development should support and promote transit use by making the best use of the underlying zoning capacity to encourage moderate or high-density development clustered near transit. Development should encourage a mix of uses where provided by underlying zoning. [An example of appropriate land use for a development adjacent to transit on a busy commercial street would be a 5-story mixed-use building with street- front retail and office above.] . Design - Development design that encourages neighborhood and pedestrian activity on the street and connectivity to transit, and decreased dependence on driving. The development should enhance the environment for pedestrians in terms of safety, comfort and visual appeal. Inviting sidewalks and pedestrian public spaces are examples of appropriate design. Developments should encourage reduced parking and creative transportation demand management solutions to emphasize transit-use. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 16 Exhibit D Project Landscape Standards INTRODUCTION The Project is located at the southwest comer of South 316th Street and 23rd Avenue South, and is approximately 6.9 acres in size. The Project will include up to 14 bus bays, up to 1,200 stalls, bus layover areas, passenger boarding areas, operator restrooms and public restrooms, street improvements, and public art. DESIGN INTENT Context-sensitive landscaping is used throughout the project. Planting beds and landscape planters appropriate to screen facades and to delineate and enhance pedestrian areas are used around the foundation of the garage, sidewalks, plazas, and transit center areas, while an "open area" planting scheme is used in future TaD Property. PEDESTRIAN SCALE LANDSCAPING The sidewalks and plazas surrounding and adjacent to the Project combine to provide a linear theme of movement throughout the Project. Sidewalks along the east-west and north-south axes of the Project and along South 316th Street are delineated by distinct paving and scoring, and connect to plazas containing seating, scored and colored concrete, lighting, trash receptacles, bicycle racks, public art elements, and plantings. These features combine to create an organized, safe, and attractive sequence of pedestrian linkages and amenities throughout the Project. Sidewalks and plazas will be accented with pedestrian-scale landscaping typical to urban pedestrian areas, including architectural landscape planters, and structured, ornamental trees and shrubs that preserve sight lines into pedestrian areas. FACADE SCREENING Planting areas on the east and west facades of the parking structure are designed to meet Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Sec. 22-1565( c), Type III "visual buffer" landscape requirements, and include a variety of evergreen and deciduous trees interspersed with large shrubs and groundcover sufficient to soften the appearance of building elevations. FUTURE TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES The landscaping design for the TaD Properties is intended to be passive in character. Interim landscaping in the TaD Properties will provide visual relief and shading while maintaining clear sight lines across the site. Sod will be provided throughout the TaD Properties and will be punctuated by deciduous trees at one tree per 3,500 square feet (a total of 15 trees) to create a passive, yet enjoyable, experience for both transit patrons and pedestrians. The interim landscaping will not be permanently irrigated; instead, Sound Transit will utilize temporary irrigation methods to properly maintain the sod and trees. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 17 Exhibit E When Recorded Mail To: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33325 - 8TH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98063-9718 A TTN: City Attorney ACCESS EASEMENT CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington Municipal Corporation CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, a Regional Transit Authority Property Legal Description (abbreviated): Easement Legal Description: Grantor: Grantee: RECITALS WHEREAS, on , the City of Federal Way, a Washington Municipal Corporation, ("Grantor" or "City") and the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, a Regional Transit Authority, ("Grantee" or "Sound Transit") entered into an Agreement, No.- ("TOD Agreement") regarding future development of Transit Oriented Development ("TOD") adjacent to the Federal Way Transit Center ("Transit Center"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the TOD Agreement, Grantee conveyed the TOD Property, legally described in Exhibit A, to the City for development ofTOD; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the TOD Agreement, Grantor agreed to provide an easement for unimpeded access between the TOD Property and the Transit Center; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor and Grantee hereby agree: 1. Grant of Easement. Grantor grants to the Grantee a non-exclusive, access easement under, across and over certain real property (the "Easement Area") located in Federal Way, Washington, legally described in Exhibit B on a non-exclusive basis and subject to the conditions and limitations herein. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 18 2. Purpose and Access. Said Easement shall be for the purpose of unimpeded access between the East TaD Property and the Transit Center. Grantee shall have the right of access to the Easement Area to enable Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder by utilizing the improved driveway or designated walkways on the East TOD Property or by any other method mutually agreeable to Grantor and Grantee. This Easement shall be non-exclusive and shall be open to the Grantee, the Grantors and the general public; provided that, Grantee shall ensure that use of the Easement Area does not interfere with the primary use of the East TOD Property and the rights and privileges of the Grantor therein. 3. Grantor's Use of Easement. Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement for any purpose not inconsistent with Grantee's rights. 4. Indemnification. Each party to this Easement shall indemnify, defend, and hold the other party, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers hannless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and all attorneys' fees) arising from or as a result of the death of any person, or any accident, injury, loss, or damage whatsoever caused to person or property, which shall occur upon the Easement Area except to the extent caused by the negligent or willful act or omission of the other party, its agents, licensees, or representatives. 5. Successors and Assigns. The rights and obligations of the Parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors in interest, heirs and assigns. day of ,2°- DATED THIS GRANTOR CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By David Moseley, City Manager GRANTEE CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY By Its Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 19 STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me David Moseley, to me known to be the City Manager of the City of Federal Way that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of ,20o_. (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me , to me known to be the of the CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of ,20o_. (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires K:\Sound Transit\Access Easement Ex. E to TaD Agreement Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 20 Exhibit A to Access Easement East TOD Property Description Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 21 Exhibit B to Access Easement Easement Area Legal Description Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 22 Exhibit F Return Address: City of Federal Way Attn: Law Dept. PO Box 9718 Federal Way, W A 98063-9718 PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES EASEMENT Grantor(s): CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington municipal corporation Grantee (s): CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, a Regional Transit Authority Property Legal Description (abbreviated): Easement Legal Description (abbreviated): Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): RECITALS WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way ("City" or "Grantor") holds rights-of-way within the City in trust for the benefit of the public, including South 316th Street between and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference ("Easement Area"); and WHEREAS, Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority ("Sound Transit" or "Grantee") desires to use space in, on, or above the Easement Area for the installation and maintenance of certain improvements that include special stamped concrete pavement, trellis footings, landscaping, street light banners and benches ("Pedestrian Amenities") for use in connection with its construction and operation of a Transit Center located at , legally described in Exhibit B ("Transit Center"); and WHEREAS, The City's Land Use Approval # installation of Pedestrian Amenities. , dated , requires the EASEMENT AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor and Grantee hereby agree: Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 23 1. Grant of Easement. Grantor grants to the Grantee a non-exclusive, pedestrian amenities easement under, across and over the Easement Area on a non-exclusive basis and subject to the conditions and limitations herein. 2. Purpose and Access. Said Easement shall be for the purpose of installation and maintenance of certain Pedestrian Amenities that include special stamped concrete pavement, trellis footings, landscaping, street light banners and benches for use in connection with the construction and operation of the Transit Center. This Easement shall be non-exclusive and shall be open to the Grantee, the Grantors and the general public; provided that, Grantee shall ensure that the Pedestrian Amenities do not interfere with the primary use of the Property and the rights and privileges of the Grantor therein. 3. Easement Area Improvements. Grantee may locate its Pedestrian Amenities on the Easement Area in the manner as described specifically in the attached Exhibit C. Grantee may not add Pedestrian Amenities in addition to that shown on Exhibit C other than as may be approved in writing by the City. 4. Grantor's Use of Easement Area. The City reserves the right to regulate, use, occupy and enjoy its Property for such purposes as it shall desire including, but not limited to, constructing or installing structures and facilities on the right-of-way, or developing, improving, repairing or altering the right-of-way. Upon the City's demand and at the Grantee's sole cost and expense, the Grantee shall remove, repair, relocate, change or reconstruct the Pedestrian Amenities pursuant to the City's instructions and within a reasonable time period prescribed by the City. 5. Restoration. In the event that Grantee causes damage of any kind during the course of installing, operating or maintaining the Pedestrian Amenities, including damage to the right-of-way caused by cutting, boring, jack hammering, excavation or other work, and including latent damage not immediately apparent at the time of the work, Grantee shall repair the damage and restore the right-of-way at Grantee's sole cost and expense, without delay or interruption and within the reasonable time period prescribed by the City. Restoration of the right-of-way shall be to a condition that is equivalent to or better than the condition of the right-of-way prior to commencing the installation, operation or maintenance of the Pedestrian Amenities and to a condition satisfactory to the City. Restoration of the right-of-way surface shall either include six inches (6") of crushed surfacing top course and three inches (3") of asphalt, class "B", or be replaced to the original condition, at the City's sole discretion. Whenever part of a square or slab or existing concrete sidewalk or driveway is cut or damaged, the entire square or slab shall be removed and replaced. All materials and compacting shall be in accordance with the "Standards and Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Mwúcipal Construction," as amended. 6. Maintenance. Grantee shall be solely responsible for keeping the Easement Area reasonably neat and clean and "in good condition and repair. Grantee shall, at its own expense, maintain the Easement Area and Pedestrian Amenities in a safe condition, in good repair, and in a manner suitable to the City. Additionally, Grantee shall keep the Easement Area free of debris, graffiti and anything of a dangerous, noxious or offensive nature or which would create a hazard or undue vibration, heat, noise or any interference with City services. Grantee shall have sole responsibility for the maintenance, repair, and security of its Pedestrian Amenities, and shall keep the same in good repair and condition. 7. Compliance with Laws. Grantee's use of the Easement Area is subject to its obtaining all certificates, pennits, zoning, and other approvals that may be required by any federal, state or local authority. Grantee shall erect, maintain and operate its Pedestrian Amenities in accordance with applicable site standards, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations issued by the City, federal or state government or any other governing bodies. Grantee acknowledges that all aspects of this Easement are consistent with existing Washington State statutes and the City Code, and to the best of its knowledge, this Easement is consistent with all other applicable federal, state and local laws. In addition, Grantee specifically acknowledges that the Easement Area is located in right-of-way subject to City's regulatory authority. Nothing herein shall be deemed to limit, impair or affect City's authority to pennit, franchise or regulate usage of rights-of-way pursuant to its lawful authority. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TaD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 24 8. Dangerous Conditions: Authority for City to Abate. Whenever construction, installation, or excavation of Pedestrian Amenities authorized by this Easement has caused or contributed to a condition which impairs the lateral support of the adjoining public way, street or public place, or endangers the public, street utilities or City-owned property, the City's Public Works Director may direct the Grantee, at the Grantee's own expense, to take reasonable action to protect the public, adjacent public places, City-owned property, streets, utilities and public ways. Such action may include compliance within a prescribed time. In the event that the Grantee fails or refuses to promptly take the actions directed by the City, or fails to fuIly comply with such directions, or if emergency conditions exist which require immediate action, the City may enter upon the Easement Area and take such actions as are reasonably necessary to protect the public, the adjacent streets, public ways and utilities, to maintain the lateral support thereof, or other actions regarded as necessary safety precautions; and the Grantee shall be liable to the City for the costs thereof The provisions of tills Section shall survive the tennination of thís Easement. 9. Indemnification. Each party to this Easement shaH indemnify, defend, and hold the other party, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers hannless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and all attorneys' fees) arising ITom or as a result of the death of any person, or any accident, injury, loss, or damage whatsoever caused to person or property, which shall occur upon the Easement Area except to the extent caused by the negligent or willful act or omission of the other party, its agents, licensees, or representatives. 10. Condemnation. In the event the Easement Area is taken in whole or in part by any entity by eminent domain, this Easement shall terminate as of the date title to the Easement Area vests in the condemning authority. Grantee shall not be entitled to any portion of the award paid and the City shall receive the full amount of such award. Grantee hereby expressly waives any right or claim to any portion thereof However, Grantee shall have the right to claim and recover ITom the condemning authority, other than the City, such other compensation as may be separately awarded or recoverable by Grantee. 11. Successors and Assigns. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors in interest, heirs and assigns. 12. Termination. If at any time the Transit Center ceases to be used as a Transit Center, this Easement Agreement shall automatically terminate. Grantee shall remove the Pedestrian Amenities from the Easement Area upon tennination of the Easement. Upon removal of the Pedestrian Amenities, Grantee shall restore the affected area of the Easement Area to the reasonable satisfaction of the City. All costs and expenses for the removal and restoration to be perfonned by Grantee shall be borne by Grantee. If however, Grantee requests pefllÙssion not to remove all or a portion of the Pedestrian Amenities, and City consents to such nomemoval, title to the affected Pedestrian Amenities shall thereupon transfer to City and the same thereafter shall be the sole and entire property of City, and Grantee shall be relieved of its duty to otherwise remove same. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 25 DATED THIS - day of GRANTOR: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: David H. Moseley, City Manager GRANTEE CENTRALPUGETSOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORlTY By: Joan M. Earl, CEO STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. ) COUNTY OF KING On this day, personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, David H. Moseley to me known to be the City Manager of the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument. Given under my hand and official seal this - day of , 2004. (notary signature) (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires: K\Sound Transit\TOD Agreement 2004\Pedestrian Amenities Easement Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center ,2004. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patricia A. Richardson, City Attorney APPROVED AT TO FORM: Stephen Sheehy, Legal Counsel STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. ) COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me , to me known to be the of Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal this - day of , 2004, (notary signature) (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires: Page 26 Exhibit A To Pedestrian Amenities Easement Easement Area Legal Description The south fifteen feet of South 3 16th Street road right-of-way, approximately 420 lineal feet, from the west curb line of 23,d Avenue South to the east curb line of21s1 Avenue South in Federal Way, King County, Washington. Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 27 Exhibit B To Pedestrian Amenities Easement Transit Center Legal Description Existing Legal Description KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT 1802027 Tax Parcel No. 092104-9021 Lot I of King County Short Plat No, 182027, according to short plat recorded March 14, 1984 under Recording No. 8403140752, in King County, Washington. Tax Parcel No. 092104-9057 Lot 2 of King County Short Plat No. 182027, according to short plat recorded March 14, 1984 under Recording No. 8403140752, in King County, Washington. . KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT 480019R Tax Parcel No. 92104-9176 Lot 2 of King County Short Plat No. 480019R, according to short plat recorded April 28, 1980 under Recording No, 8004280455, in King County, Washington; Except that portion conveyed to the City of Federal Way, for road, by deed recorded under Recording No. 20001215001690. Except that portion conveyed to the City of Federal Way, a Washington Municipal Corporation, under statutory warranty deed recorded December 18,2002, under Recording No. 20021218002306. Tax Parcel No. 092104-9298 Lot 3 of King County Short Plat No. 480019R, according to short plat recorded April 28, 1980 under Recording No. 8004280455, in King County, Washington; Except that portion conveyed to the City of Federal Way by deeded recorded under Recording No. 20010323001260, Tax Parcel No. 092104-9299 Lot A of King County Short Plat No. 480019R, according to short plat recorded April 28, 1980 under Recording No. 8004280455, in King County, Washington. Except that portion conveyed to the City of Federal Way by deed recorded under Recording No. 20000807001155. Also except that portion conveyed to the City of Federal Way by deed recorded under Recording No. 20020724000972 . Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 28 Exhibit C To Pedestrian Amenities Easement Pedestrian Amenities Sketch Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOD at Federal Way Transit Center Page 29 SW 1/4, SEC. 9, TWP 21 N. AGE 4E. WM ""'---zHOÖ ..---.- --.-..'- .. 19+00 N 8817'46' W 20f'OO ..-.. --'----"-.--. :¡¡ WAY l " o. , . I I~ I ,. \ I. I ~~I¡; I '- , ;I! , ~. !. I ~I, ~ ~I' S. 316th STREET 18+00 !I~ ~¡ ~- ~¡ I~ - ~I-~ ~~{ ..-l-II-~. -(I--{ 1-1~ i ,i ..". ACI! I""".. t. HS _0. .... '.. ~ . . I -'~ <: ~ ~I:i atY ct.1tIWL-,",Y.... SlO. IUII:>-"-.II< '_lOB< c""",.,,1[).'" 1m. (""<.\lATu-.) '"\. =;:;:;; ..,. ~-::;=:= '~""--'- , . T SooNoTRAHsrr " . 10.0..1 SOUND TRANSIT REGIONAL EXPRESS I~;~'SF.OO I'MSI-OO," F'EDERAL WAY TRANSlT CENTER .", ....... I, 1111> STAEETSC...PE EXHIBIT ¡¡w ........ APRIL " lOO4 .. ... north end of the Project parking garage. Sound Transit shall grant access easements to the Project if such a pedestrian bridge proposal is viable and will be fully funded either by the City or by a third party who agrees to fully fund all costs associated with such a pedestrian bridge including design, penuitting, construction and maintenance. In the event that the number of parking stalls within the Project garage would be reduced to accommodate the pedestrian bridge proposal, Sound Transit shall be entitled to compensation for such a loss in parking. Sound Transit reserves the right to review and reject or approve any particular proposal. Sound Transit's approval shall not be unreasonably witlilleld or delayed. L Sound Transit shall provide experienced staff to work with the City in the development of the TaD. . J. Sound Transit shall provide a night management security plan to the City for the Project. 2.2 Conveyance ofTOD Properties A. West TaD property In the event that Sound Transit is not able to secure a commitment from a qualified developer within ,eighteen (18) months of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, who will agree to develop the West TaD Property within five (5) years of occupancy of the Project, on tenus and conditions acceptable to Sound Transit in its sole judgment, or the developer does not commence construction of the TOD on the West TaD Property within five (5) years of occupancy of the Project, Sound Transit shall convey the West TOO Property to the City consistent with all applicable federal, state, and local policies and regulations for such conveyances, the tenus of this Agreement, and for valuable consideration in the form of the City's assurance that any future development of the West TOD Property will be consistent with the definition of TOO in this Agreement. Sound Transit shall retain penuanent utility, access, and signage easements over across and through the West TOD Property as necessary for Sound Transit's continued use and enjoyment of the Project property. B. East TOD Property In the event that Sound Transit detennines within eighteen (18) months of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Project that it is not able to secure a commitment ftom a qualified developer, who will agree to develop the East TOO Property within five (5) years of occupancy of the Project on tenus and conditions acceptable to Sound Transit in its sole Agreement Between Sound Transit and Federal Way For Future TOO at Federal Way Transit Center Page 5 , . CtTY OF Federal Way DATE: August 11, 2004 TO: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee FROM: Cary M. Roe, P.E., Public Wor~ Rir~tor ~ David H. Moseley, City Manag~~ VIA: SUBJECT: Better Roads, Better Transit; King County Department Of Transportation Proposal For Arterial Improvements BACKGROUND: King County Department of Transportation has developed a proposal to fund road improvements and expanded transit service countywide by placing a November 2004 ballot measure to impose a 2.8- cent local option gas tax and .01 percent sales tax. This proposal has been shared with Public Works Directors in a workshop held on July 22, 2004 and an elected officials meeting held on August 5 and August 6,2004 (see attached discussion paper, workshop summary, and draft ballot language). ACTION: King County is seeking input from jurisdictions regarding their proposal in order to assess support before placing it on the November 2004 ballot. Staff will present King County's proposal at the August 16 LUTC meeting, including outstanding issues that have been identified to date. RECOM MEN DATION: Staff is seeking direction from the Land Use and Transportation Committee regarding King County Department of Transportation proposal. k:\lutc\2004\O8-16-04 king county transportation funding proposal.doc . \ July 29,2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Public Works Directors and Government Relations Staff FROM: Harold S. Taniguchi, Director King County Department of Transportation SUBJECT: Follow-Up from July 22,2004 Workshop I am writing to follow up on the workshop we held on July 22,2004, to continue our discussion about increasing funding for local transportation. I am SOITY you were unable to attend, but I wanted you to be aware ofthe outcome ofthat workshop. I am attaching a copy of the summary from the workshop for your infonnation. Also attached is a copy of the proposal and the draft ballot title language that our Department is considering for addressing funding shortfalls for our local roads and transit. Weare still , exploring this idea, but would appreciate help from local jurisdictions in detennining whether sufficient support exists to proceed. We hope that you will give some thought to how your city might use these funds if they materialize. We would be especially interested in any specific arterial projects-signal coordination, arterial widening, sidewalk improvements, etc.-that you might want to pursue with these funds. We would also be interested in knowing if you would be more inclined to use the gas tax revenues for preservation and maintenance. This issue will be a discussion item on the August agendas for the subarea Technical Advisory Committees. These will be held on August 3 and 4,2004. We hope that you will give consideration to possible use of these funds and provide infonnation at those meetings. Thank you in advance for your help. If you have any questions, please contact me, at 206-684-1441 (harold.taniguchi@metrokc.gov) or Sally Marks, Supervising Transportation Planner, at 206-263-4710 (sally.marks@metrokc.gov). Attachments cc: Eastside Transportation Partnership Technical Advisory Committee South County Area Transportation Board Technical Advisory Committee Seashore Transportation Forum Technical Advisory Committee July 29,2004 Local Transportation Funding Workshop Thursday, July 22, 2004 Meeting Summary Attendees Rob English, Kenmore Gregg Zimmennan, Renton Don Cairns, Redmond Chuck Williams, King County Steve Morikawa, Bothell Dennis Dowdy, Auburn Bill Guenzler, Maple Valley Dorinda Costa, Seattle Charlie Shell, Seattle Jim Walker, Newcastle David Foster, Seattle Goran Spamnan, Bellevue Azim Sheikh-Taheri, WSDOT Kevin Murphy, PSRC Steve Schuller, Duvall Don Wickstrom, Kent Doug Wentworth, Seattle Kirsten Pennington, Burien John Walsh, Pacific Seyed Safavian, Bothell Kim Becklund, Bellevue Doug Levy, KentlFederal Way consultant Ashley Probart, Association of Carolyn Robertson, Auburn Washington Cities Introduction Harold Taniguchi, Director of the King County Department of Transportation, welcomed participants and briefly explained that the purpose ofthe workshop was to continue the discussion, begun in December 2003, about options for local transportation funding. Ron Posthuma, Assistant Director, reviewed the reasons for the shortfall in funding resulting from initiatives, state actions and a sluggish economy. He also reviewed the results of recent votes on transportation issues, which indicated that, in general, King County residents voted to tax themselves for transportation improvements. Participant Initiatives Several participants indicated that their cities are considering levy lid lifts or local actions to provide funding for transportation needs in their cities. Seattle representatives reported that they, along with the Association of Washington Cities, are identifying a list of options for consideration in the 2005 legislative session. Bellevue representative indicated that the regional and state system is its highest priority for funding. For local needs, Bellevue is interested in tax increment financing. King County Department of Transportation Suggestion Harold Taniguchi and Ron Posthuma outlined an idea that the King County Department of Transportation is exploring to use existing authority to raise revenue to reduce congestion, improve operational efficiency, and enhance preservation of the arterial system. The proposal J ul y22meetingsummary , . would involve a November 2004 ballot measure to impose a 2.8-cent local option gas tax and 0.1 percent sales tax . The proposed 2.8-cent per gallon local option gas tax would generate approximately $27 million annually for cities and the unincorporated area in King County. This regional tax would be allocated among the jurisdictions based on population. Approximately $7 million in new revenues would be distributed to King County, $8 million to Seattle and another $12 million to other cities. These funds would encourage partnering among jurisdictions to solve congestion problems on the arterial system. The 0.1 percent sales tax would generate $40 million annually that would provide more transit service to residents and businesses in the county, including new and improved bus service, particularly in major centers, better bus connections to commuter rail, light rail and the monorail, and partnerships to support employer trip reduction programs and economic development in urban centers. This initiative, if approved, would cost an average of about $42 per household per year. . . Kevin Desmond, General Manager, Transit Division, and Linda Dougherty, Director, Roads Services Division, provided additional information about how these funds might be used and responded to questions. Ron Posthuma added that some business, labor, and environmental representatives have expressed support for the proposal, and indicated that additional outreach will continue. Depending on the feedback from the outreach efforts, the Executive will determine whether or not to proceed with an ordinance to the King County Council. The Department is reviewing the following issues, which were raised during the discussion: . Would the ballot title pass the test of two subjects in one measure? . Does the RTID have first use ofthe local option gas tax? Would the RTID Executive Board need to approve King County's using the local option gas tax for its purposes? How can the public be informed about the need for additional revenue? Will bonding be used? What revenues would be generated by all the currently-authorized options? Would the use ofthe sales tax funds be consistent with the 40/40/20 policy? How would this measure affect the outcome of the 2005 legislative session? What affect would an advisory ballot on RTID have on this measure? Is there a need to develop collaborative arterial project lists? What actions are needed from local jurisdictions at this point? Next Steps . . . . . . . . . Provide update on continued outreach efforts Identify collaborative arterial projects with cities . July22meetingsummary 2 , , July 29,2004 Draft Ballot Language The following is a draft of the basic ballot language for the measure for local transportation funding that is being considered. (Official fonnatting and required language regarding County Council action are not included.) This measure would authorize the county to finance a coordinated system of new Metro transit services, facilities and equipment, signal synchronization, and county road and city street projects, by imposing a local motor vehicle fuel tax at ten percent ofthe state tax rate (2.8 cents per gallon at the current state tax rate) and an additional transit sales tax of one-tenth of one percent (one cent on a ten dollar purchase). . . Better Roads-Better Transit King County Department of Transportation Proposal for Arterial Improvements For discussion with Public Works Directors Thursday, July 22, 2004 Better Roads-Better Transit Problem: Local governments have less revenue for transportation Today, cities and counties in this region are faced with maintaining aging transportation infrastructure and making improvements to meet all kinds of transportation needs with diminishing revenues. . No gas tax increases occuITed between 1990 and 2003. In 2003, the state adopted the "Nickel" package, a five-cent gas tax increase, which focused primarily on major improvements to Highways of Statewide Significance. Local jurisdictions received no direct distribution from this 5-cent increase in the state gas tax. Fuel tax revenues have been declining at an average rate of almost 4% per year (in inflation adjusted dollars) due to the restrictive structuring of that revenue source. In 1995, the Supreme Court ruled the Street Utility Fee as unconstitutional, and several cities that had enacted the fee lost these revenues. Initiative 695's repeal of the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax was enacted by the legislature, reducing Metro Transit revenues by more than $100 million per year. Initiative 747's property tax limitation has restricted this important source of general revenue that many cities use to support street maintenance. Initiative 776 repealed the Vehicle License Fee, which provided approximately $18 million to local jurisdictions in King County in 2002. Over ten years, local jurisdictions in King County will lose approximately $220 million. In addition, the sales tax, which funds transit and some other transportation improvements, has not generated the levels of revenue projected four years ago because ofthe economic downturn. . . . . . . Responses: Short term measures have been taken Jurisdictions have reduced spending by increasing efficiency, delaying capital expenditures, and deferring maintenance and taking other short tenn actions . The Puget Sound Regional Council agreed to increase the share of federal funds directed toward local jurisdictions to 50% in the 2004 federal grant cycle. In addition, local jurisdictions have been exploring a range of alternatives for additional revenues including property tax increases, levy lid lifts, commercial parking taxes, surcharges and other fees . July 22, 2004 New Proposal: Better Roads-Better Transit While these actions to generate new revenue may have merit for mid- to long-tenn improvements, action is needed quickly to respond to the growing problem. The King County Department of Transportation (DOT) is exploring a ballot measure that focuses on the backbone of the transportation network in King County--our arterial system. . Most transit service in King County operates on the arterial system. Almost two-thirds of vehicle hours and half of vehicle miles in the afternoon peak hour travel on the arterial system. Over half the delay experienced on roads in King County is on arterials. The capacity ofthe arterial system is the key factor is detennining where new employment and housing growth can occur under growth management. Arterials provide important connections for freight. . . . . Our arterial system is the responsibility of the county and cities to preserve and improve. . The most recent state gas tax increase did not provide funds for arterial improvements The draft plan for the Regional Transportation Investment District did not identify funds for arterial improvements in King County. . King County DOT is suggesting using existing authority to raise revenue to reduce congestion, improve operational efficiency, and enhance preservation of the arterial system. The proposal would involve a November 2004 ballot measure to impose a 2.8- cent local option gas tax and 0.1 percent sales tax . The proposed 2.8-cent per gallon local option gas tax would generate approximately $27 million annually for cities and the unincorporated area in King County. This regional tax would be allocated among the jurisdictions based on population (see attached table). Approximately $7 million in new revenues would be distributed to King County, $8 million to Seattle and another $12 million to other cities. These funds would encourage partnering among jurisdictions to solve congestion problems on the arterial system. The 0.1 percent sales tax would generate $40 million annually that would provide more transit service to residents and businesses in the county, including new and improved bus service, particularly in major centers, better bus connections to commuter rail, light rail and the monorail. and partnerships to support employer trip reduction programs and economic development in urban centers. This initiative, if approved, would cost an average of about $42 per household per year. . . 2 July 22, 2004 What would the proposal buy? Projects that preserve and improve the countywide arterial system .:. Ready to construct projects: Critical arterial congestion relief projects such as . 140th Avenue SE @ SE Petrovitsky Road, intersection improvement would allow more reliable movement of over 46,000 vehicles per day, including 100 buses . Coal Creek Parkway, widening project would provide more reliable movement for over 21,000 vehicles per day, including 82 buses . Projects also include sidewalk improvements to enhance connections with transit .:. Signal improvements: Arterial ITS, including signal synchronization and other operational improvements that improve traffic flow and transit reliability such as . Juanita-Woodinville Road between 1O0th Avenue NE and 124th Avenue NE - serves roughly 180 buses per day . 4th Avenue South between South 148th and South Roxbury - serves about 130 buses per day . Improved signal controllers and communications enabling transit signal priority at over 500 intersections throughout the County .:. Improved local transit integration with high capacity light rail, monorail and commuter rail investments: . Existing bus routes providing regional connections reoriented to provide more direct and frequent transit service within local areas Local bus connections in each area that will extend the reach of regional investments and local access to activity centers closer to home . .:. Preservation and maintenance: Pothole repair, safety improvements and critical pavement overlays on arterials, such as . 1 st Avenue South Urban Retrofit between the Seattle city limits and the Burien city limits, construct curb, gutter, sidewalk, drainage and landscaping along this arterial. . Des Moines Memorial Drive between South 99th Street and South 128th Street, construct curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bicycle lanes along this arterial. Upgrade traffic signals and improve landscaping. . Countywide 3R program to reserve funds to aid in the resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation of existing King County Roads. .:. Improved bus service: More frequent bus service and improved transit customer facilities throughout the day in each area of the county: . All-day fifteen-minute service frequency on many more core service connections between activity centers on the Eastside, in South King County and in Seattle. 3 July 22, 2004 . . . New or refurbished shelters, and electronic signs providing real-time bus arrival infonnation at many locations. .:. Leveraged partnership investments in targeted centers to promote economic development and achieve significant increases in transit use: . Bellevue downtown - NE 8th St. bus rapid transit (BRT), managed parking, pass distribution and subsidies, demand management and ridesharing programs. . Sea-Tac - Partnership with the Port for ridership development, and BRT connecting to Federal Way, Burien, Kent and Auburn . Shoreline and Seattle -- Aurora Avenue BR T . Seattle downtown and South Lake Union - New service to S. Lake Union, managed parking and intensive pass marketing and distribution. Why Act Now? The need exists-the longer we wait, the worse the situation becomes. . Cities and the County are deferring needed projects because of funding cutbacks. Service increases to meet demand, on-going maintenance to preserve roads, and capacity and efficiency improvements to meet growing demands are not happening. The opportunity is now - The tools to do this are already available to us . With a presidential election this fall, it is predicted the chance of a successful initiative is increased. By focusing on arterial-based improvements, the initiative will pennit cities and the County to act quickly to improve transportation conditions "close to home." Such improvements should be readily visible to residents and businesses and help show them that their money is being used to effect positive changes to transportation conditions in their communities. This will allow completion of investments that will complement the improvements being planned by the Seattle Monorail, Sound Transit and the Regional Transportation Investment District. King County voters have repeatedly rejected initiatives for tax cuts and have shown a willingness to tax themselves for transportation . . . . Attachment: Comparison of VLF Revenue vs. Local Option Gas Tax Revenue (Table) 4 July 22, 2004 . . , " " , , ::>,,:"Compari.SøuqfVtF'Revenue vs. Local Option Gas Tax Revenue,:'. .,' ,,:: '," '1, ; ",' , ' :' Jurisdiction Algona Auburn* Beaux Arts VLF Revenue $23,583 410,680 2,755 239,091 137,446 13,876 $19,807,976 $7,323,476 $27,131,452 161,302 86,068 9,433 $13,287,313 $4,926,965 $18,214,278 *Cities whose borders cross county lines (I) Fuel tax collections are estimated by the W A State Office of Financial Management assuming King County's share of total state fuel gallons taxed at 2.8 cents per gallon using current 2003 fuel sales and population forecasts. The estimate used in this projection is minus 2.5% of the OFM forecast for estimated administration expenses and refunds. A Fëderal Way DATE: August 16, 2004 FROM: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee Marwan Salloum P. E., Street Systems Manager ~ David H. M~er 2004 Asphalt Overlay Project - Project Acceptance TO: VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: Prior to release of retainage on a Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of labor and Industries requirements. The above-referenced contract with Watson Asphalt Paving Co. is complete. The final construction contract amount is $1,080,056.17. This is $68,470.83 below the $1,148,527 (including contingency) budget that was approved by the City Council on March 1, 2004. Due to fact that the 2004 Street Overlay authorized funding (including contingency) was not expended and the City Council authorized Staff to add Schedule C (16th Ave South) and Schedule F (S 364th WattS 359th Street) back in to the contract if the project funding allows. Both Schedule C and F were added in to the contract. Staff will be present at the September 20th land Use & Transportation meeting to answer any questions the Committee might have. RECOMMENDATION: Place the following item on the September 7, 2004 Council Consent Agenda for approval: Final acceptance of the completed 2004 Asphalt Overlay Project, constructed by to Watson Asphalt Paving Co., in the amount of $1,080,056.17, as complete. k:\lutc\2004\2004 asphalt overlay project- Project acceptance.doc cc: Project File Central File CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Subject: August 10,2004 Federal Way City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee David H. M~Manager Iwen Wang, Man"t~n:ent Services Director ~ " Via: Federal Way Public Schools 2003/2004 Capital Facilities Plan/School Impact Fee The City has received the Federal Way School District's 2004/2005 Capital Facilities Plan with the proposed school impact fees for the City's annual review and adoption. The new fees, if approved, will be effective January 1, 2005, are $2,868 per single-family unit and $905 per multi-family dwelling unit. This is a $401 or 12% decrease from the $3,269 single-family rate, and $35 or 3% decrease from the $940 multi-family rate. A number of variables go into the school impact fee calculation. Among them are the District's facility needs, construction costs required for schools, and the student generating factor (average students per household in elementary, middle, and high schools respectively) in new single and multi-family developments. The calculated amounts are then reduced by any state matching funds and voter approved property taxes for construction. Finally, a 50% factor is applied to eliminate imperfections in the fee calculation model. Attachments: Federal Way School District 2004/2005 Capital Facilities Plan (the new impact fee calculation is on page 26). Committee Recommendation: Forward the draft Federal Way School District 2004/2005 Capital Facilities Plan and proposed impact fee to full Council for approval with implementation of the proposed fee of $2,868 per single family development and $905 per multi-family development effective January 1,2005. CommittéeApproval Federal Way Public Schools 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan Buildingfor the 21st Century FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Evelyn Castellar Charles Hoff Bob Mìllen Earl VanDorien SUPERINTEND ENT Thomas R. Murphy FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction Inventory of Educational Facilities Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities Needs Forecast - New Facilities Six Year Finance Plan MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction Map - Elementary Boundaries Map - Middle school Boundaries Map - Senior High Boundaries SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction Building Capacities Portable Locations Student Forecast Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fee Calculations SUMMAR Y OF CHANGES FROM THE 2003/04 PLAN ii 11 lll-V 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-13 14-15 16-18 19-23 24-26 27-30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act - (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991», and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2004. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within whìch urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the six year Capital Facilities Plan. On October 12, 1998 the Federal Way School District Board of Education approved a recommendation to move to a Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high school grade configuration. This new grade configuration began in the fall of 2003. This grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs. It allows for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes. The middle school provides more developmentally appropriate instruction and a better academic transition between elementary school and high school. Middle schools also allow two- year preparation for the W A State 7th grade test, and matches most western Washington Districts. With State and District standards becoming even tougher, 9th grade students need to be brought into the high school environment and given access to high school subject specialist. The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year preparation for the W A State 10th grade test, and physically places the high school students together. iii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) Federal Way citizens apprQved a bond proposal of $83 million in September 1999. This bond provided for Todd Beamer High School ($44 million); a middle school ($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of Tniiñãn High School ($6 million)_and other general improvements ($7 million). Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are: parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music . equipment, infonnation systems and networks and emergency communications. Todd Beamer High School opened in September 2003. The school opened with three grades, 9th, 10th and 11th. Seniors in 2003/04 are allowed to complete their high school education at the current high school. This does put some strain on capacity at the three existing high schools. In order to accommodate this decision measures to maximize the capacity in the existing buildings were implemented and three portables were added to high school campuses. Capacity for the 2003/04 school year was calculated at 100% usage in order to give the Ith grade students the opportunity to stay at the current school. Todd Beamer High School was designed with planning offices for teachers; Decatur, Federal Way and Thomas Jefferson do not have designated planning areas. In order to accommodate planning space for teachers, capacity must be calculated at 83% of maximum as planning generally takes place in the classrooms. This 83% figure is used in the Program Capacity calculation for Decatur High School, Federal Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High School shown on page 13. A Middle School Transition Team began meeting in May 2001 to develop recommendations for the middle school programs. These recommendations were adopted by the Board of Education on March 25, 2002. The adopted recommendations include block instruction with 2 teacher teams meeting with about 60 students daily for students in the 6th and 7th grade. Eighth grade teachers will see 90 students each day. This structure lengthens contact time for students with fewer adults and is believed to develop stronger relationships. Fewer transitions for students will provide continuity to the day and promote a calmer campus. The 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan reflects a reduced capacity to accommodate the middle school block instruction. The facility impacts will require further analysis of capacity as the middle school cuITiculum is refined. Modifications to vocational instructional areas at the middle schools were made in the past year. These modifications increased the capacity at the middle school level by converting shop areas to classrooms. The increased capacity is noted in the program capacity on page 13. lV FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year with 60 students. This ptlrgram currently serves approximately 405 students, 80 are st~dents also served in other Federal Way School District buildings. Additionally the school serves students through the Digital Learning Commons. The number of students served as tuition-based students has increased to approximately 175. These tuition-based students are not included in the forecasts for Internet Academy. The forecast for this school is based on current average ann!1al enrollment. Historical growth hãs not been a reliable tool to forecast this enrollment. Internet Academy has become a model for providing quality instruction to various locations. Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative areas and a computer lab area. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of "distance learners". . " Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the lllahee Junior High site. Two additional portables were added for opening the 2000/01 school year to expand the program to include ninth grade students. Federal Way Puhliè- Academy has extended the program to serve students in grades 6 through 10. There are currently 286 students in this school. The District purchased a facility for Federal Way Public Academy. The renovation of this building is complete and students moved into the building in October 2003. The portables used to house Federal Way Public Academy are being used for Merit School, the Child Find program, a training facility and temporary instructional space for Illahee Middle School. As smaller class sizes roll forward into the secondary levels, we anticipate a slight decline at middle school between 2006 and 2009. This does not diminish the need to open a new middle school in the 2005 school year. Middle school facilities are overcrowded at current enrollment levels and portables are considered a temporary solution to this overcrowding. Even with adding seats for 700 students at the opening of the new middle school in 2005, projections based on current program capacity indicates a surplus capacity of only 44 seats. Another initiative that will impact capacity at the secondary schools is the Puget Sound Early College. Highline Community College is offering this program to 11 th and 1ih grade students at the Federal Way campus. The program allows promising 11th and 1ih grade students the opportunity to complete their high school diploma and the Associate of Arts college degree in their final two years of high school. In the first year, we expect 60 11th and 12th grade students to attend the Puget Sound Early College. The district has a cooperative agreement with Head Start for facility use to serve income eligible Pre-Kindergarten students. Currently we house Head Start programs at 3 of our elementary schools. Headstart is building a new facility on the Harry Truman High School campus. This facility will centralize Headstart services in the Federal Way community. The District anticipates expanding the ECEAP Pre-Kindergarten program when Headstart space becomes available in the elementary schools. v FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1- THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires thatsevéral pieces-of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about CUITent facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 MiITor Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd A venue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 34620 9th A venue S Federal Way 98003 lllahee 36001 1 st A venue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Totem 26630 40th A venue S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 36001 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACES Internet Academy 32020 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Propertv Administrative Building MOT Site Central Kftchêtì -'- Federal Way Memorial Field 31405 18th Avenue S -1066 S 320th Street 1344 S 308th Street 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way 98003 98003 98003 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center BCBAP Offices 1813 S Commons 30819 14th Ave S Federal Way Federal Way 98003 98003 Undeveloped Propertv I S~e I 75 65 60 73 71 82 .74 96 Location SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW - 9.2 Acres S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S - 8.S Acres E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW - 23.45 Acres S 344th Street & 46th A venue S - 17.47 Acres 1st Way Sand S 342nd St - Minimal acreage 3737 S 360th St - 47.13 Acres (13 acres are being developed for the seventh middle school; 12-15 acres are wetlands) S 30Sth St a.nd 14th Ave S - .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPA TED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees. The District is formulating mid range plans for facilities needs at some existing instructional facilities. Major r~novation or replacement of some existing facilities is being considered. The District is also planning the replacement of some non-instructional faciliti~s. A site is under consideration to centralize many of the non-instructional functions. Buildings to house the transportation, maintenance, food services and administrative functions may be moved to a single location in the future. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPA TED SOURCE OF FUNDS New Middle School Site 74 Anticipated source of funds are current bond - - Issues. 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total Revenue Impact Fees (1) $605.000 $605.000 $1,210,000 Land Sale Funds (2) $565,000 $565,000 Bond Funds (3) $4,695,000 $4,695,000 . . State Match (4) $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $450,000 $430,000 $5,880,00(] ..- $8,260,(100 $2,000,000 $1,055,000 ' $1,035,000 $0 $0 $12,350,000 TOTAL Projected Revenue State Match (5) $( Bond or Levy Funds (6) $ 17,ooo,OOC Land Fund Sales (7) $1,164,000 Impact Fees (8) $1,500,000 .. TOTAL $19,664,000 NEW SCHOOLS Total I'dor Years 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004.2009 1'01~11 Cost Middle School $543,740 Sl,SOO,()()O $12,827.400 $<28,HIJO $14,856,2()( $15,400,000 Middle SChlXII Site $J,600,000 $( $1,(iOO,000 - rood Beamer lIigh School - $42,203,767 $1 ,'JJ,8ZH $1,'JIU28 $44,117,595 rodd Beamer HI~h School Silc $3,432,405 $( $3,4:12,40:. ..- Federal Way Public AeadclII\' $5,443,094 $( $5,44:1,094 MODERN]ZATION AN]) EXPANSION $( $0 rlUlIlan Senior Hi~h $5,642,666 ~1.107,134 .. $1.107,134 $6,750,000 Expansion Middle Schools $2,132,440 $0 $2,132,440 Expansion Elmm:lIlary Schools $:~.O()O,OOO $2,OOO,(JO( $2,000,000 TEMI'ORAR'r' I"ACII.ITU~<; $( $0 I'ortable.< ('J) $ROO,O()O S800.00\) $I,()()O,()()( $1,600,000 roTA I. $60,998,112 $4,521,1(,2 $14,!ì27,400 $1,328.860 $1100,000 $0 $0 $2I,4i7,421 $82.475,534 NOTES: I. 1bese fees are culTentIy being held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. Tlús is year end balance on 12/31103. 2. These funds come from various sales of land and are set aside for estimated expendicures. This is yearend balance on 12/31103. 3. This is the 12/31103 balance of bond funds. 4. These are state matching funds received for Todd Beamer High School, Truman High School and the additons to existing buildings. This is a year end balance on 12/31103. 5. 1be new middle school is not eligible for state match funds. 6. These bond funds were sold on 6/08104. 7. Two of three property sales have closed in 2004 and the third is projected to close !his calendar year. These funds represent the proceeds from these sales. No other properties are actively marketed al this úffie. 8, These are projected fees based upon Icnowu residential developments in the Districl over the next six years. 9. These fees represent the cost of moving existing portables and purchasing new portables. The DislriCI may choose to purchase new portables in the years shown. This estimate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-5), six middle school schools (grades 6-8), five senior high schools (grades 09-12) and one school serving-students in grades 6 -10 for the 2004/05 school year. The Internet Academy "serves grades K-12. In June 2002 the Board of Education adopted new secondary boundaries beginning with 2003/04 school year. A boundary committee will meet in the 2004/05 school year to recommend modifications to the elementary and middle school boundaries. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Wãy Public Academy serve studen~ from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed . annually. Any change in gr<!de configuration or adoþtion of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in schóol service åieas. The Growth Managemellt Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful-consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN E F............ ........ G .1 H u u\m¡'~\\1";--ITi'.~'-;"Í--~\I(\~-"-------"u---'~_",,,,n-"':ce',, : , ,,\,:::~ ~ '~~~~~ "~¡¡;[9:-' ~~~: : I Zon,," (~~ r'f~~-::," ,/ ,~ ; ¡, : ",. '~:,ï I ~ '-' H iWF~:' ", ':~,,~:.- " ':- \~l,~~I, ~~~'~ '",'", ~" ~ ::! frg~~J, '~,' ~i . 'bt:.ufIT1' ,-, ,-. ~. \ l ;':\':. .!/~ , 2 H=: ~~~~<,j' ',;;;.¡~~lJ ,Ntl~~' ~~"I- 'Q'~T ~^'- ' . ,;"' ¡ '-," , ~'W','" ~:=~~zl~-' ¥'-;' J.; ;;;~" ..J' :- ~ - ;;.'~;,'~ J~~:::: ¡¡ rnrr;) ;: .")"\'";I ~...- "",:f;~ '9;"1. rJI-" ,. . 'I :< .:~.~ - ,_. ~ ~ ~ {I ;i. ¡ ~'hb ~ Ii. " ," ";'. ~::.: A !j§ ~ 3 !1 ¡~,;~;~l ~t¡. ;1fiIfj" ~: ~1 , . ,/~ r~l "T. ~ ".II ;~.I'" 18 "j kt . ,~, " : I-- f- 'OOO-OH ,~",!J1 .... s 212 St ~ --. "I 8- "'CH;:~ .!¡.;,..~, ~¡~~ti:!{jt;~ ~, 4 :::>~~~~:-~~: ~ j\¡F~."7~Ki- ~ . ~ .,,:~, ~.:. ~ \ ¡i9~~/".' 21~ 7~~f;~. ~i 4 . ,,' ,13.. ':;;; "".-; 42 -"';1 ~.,~. K¿~ ' ;:;,.~(,~\~ : ,- l~l.:'; -';:~; ;~~~~~I ~ ;;;,,; '~~~,;, ' ,.;.. E"" ;-: '.~.f.?ì~;,~t-, ~j-5 ':¡~~_.~'~~-'"'-'t ,!/<.:::. - ~:tSg; ':""'-I~' '5 FEDERAL WA y, WASHINGTON and VICíA1NIT f~ l' . ~.:f7F¡I:~n) ;:~r:~;.};~ 't[- - ',';' ,i,~~ -, 3 ,j.~ ' '." "1 ~ -: ¡I I 0 ,~,,"...<. ';¡"";'ti"-,;:-¡~:d'I.:.IJ....' '=~I'F;;..J~t,,_. :::' ~~.. P;:! ~ ,- ,~, "~ - ", sou" ",~'~'~:':j¡~ _.,' ". ~.'" !,'~~,,~~~/,:~_.~ , .r~~ :¡:~3~. ~~ -",,~ r.1Ø' ..øi"-, pV ~,"""-:",~u,,,~~~:.\'~:'[I. ¡""" ,: (I:'.'~.!.'.+~'" '1"¡,::¡:':;!:¡')-~rl1 . ~¡~t;i';¡C;:-;~,:;, ~l~Ä~~.' ~~1,! '~.'.. .'~.!".'~~'J! ,: .....,-- - ~'" ~',~ '11",.:..,.,1 "I" 'I"l:~ .~:'¿~'~~:i¡ ,{~ì ,[,~;w:_. ~ -~' -- ,', \~~ "" ,~iliÏ;'!':<':Ù' ,:, :,;':::~'..¡:.;.::.,' ! .. ::'~~f,: 1;\'.. :_.,~ ~'J.'-'" ,: I.' ~., , - . , I (; ""J/i..*-~ ;j'li," '~'" -;;"~' .~.~ - - .""'1 ~~,;jfj¡i£:'," \:", .:.;:þ þP", " ~~ ...-.~;.J..'. ,~..,~~~~.1~'" ..<:~'~¡.:=:~"'d~~~.";-3:' ¡::~.::":??~."'~~'\" F,~ -f~ti~.. 0.. ~ "". ,.,,:""',;?d-,. ~f¡;~ . ~ =-6 ' - E;'ìMi '_.;'-' ~..;.. ~.." , ':~~;. ...', \'~~: ~-::i :",h~i L::o:""YP'49 ,.' '1,,1"" ',':,o'.::~' , ",J1i!l;.. ,0',' ,;:::::~ _..--1",,-.... :..," ""', '~~"'~'r.~;-;;;,.;,~", "¡-.. N':..,..,.i< ' '".:;.:;."" '-"or": 40... !'~, '~;'-"'J" "'i'--r,,;!!!'. ~,.¡~...' ,I !:ro-,,' j! i . -..:".""" ""L..,..", . ,.. . s.: ~, u,,}' 'l.,l 85 ,-, ~", 5220St .. i' ~ "'00 ~,~,,~,:::~~-~'7 :~,,:""-~: .."" ":;~I~',.~<:~;;~ ~ -.';~;::~:ì ~:;.:::~tf\.w.:, ~~;..~t13:t'. ~:,";;;!\ .~\ . ;,!~.. . . / . 5 ,,' ,,~, 13 ~",if. . M.~ ~~y "-'" "'/-l~~ /1 ' ,- 1 ,- ~.. ,: 7 n,";,:- ,: ~,""~"', :;...;t,,~ ,,'" ¡"',:,~"L ;f:~:~;J¡, II.~~"""¡~'-'~ ~"."". r .- ~ ' ',' "'j...j'" . ., -- .""-~' . 7,..-".",1. ' ~,'..' _..: j 7 ~., ~::.:' ~, ,):' ,.':', ,'," -:; ~n"._.~~~";t¡.)'~':J: ,i,~~~! t ;.';î~."j ,= /jir:. 0" l ~'~.' '~ ~~'. ":"": ~ :I/,<' .....:~;, :.~~.. "::7.,..~;.";.;È,ffi~1 s '°, .;..:'~ ~""¡"'~("'~~~'~~.. '"" t ~,:-.! I¡:~I" ".' N ; B"'" . 'Ef. ,,' m ~ s=..:~, C,m.~i'è rw ~ t '~""-- 1!! . .....,,0 ".;' ,2 ;.. , ' ";;;;:' "":,JI"""'" . t! ~"...."". ..-" ';';'ã"~, 1¡ I '--- 8 n, 0,>" ~~~ .,;' ~~ ;~~'{'~ ,~~.~.,~ ~ ~,~ -;1.1 .'.0°""".';' -~~;'Þ:~ ~,' "i:!§ ~8 w ~ E ,>.~~ -~. ~~:~~ " .. ~ ~I ~ ffiJJ I 41\. ";""~.,...§i~f~:~~~ \,- ~ ~'è tll . - ",¡ ~:'- :.. . ~ ,.:::. .. ~' :: ...: g ,~;'t ~~. ~ "J ~- "i;;' ; to ~ '--. .'-~- ....b-- ..:..~ ;;.:h,~ ~i. "~.' . . 3~~i~: S35~St :J~~J" ~~,*:~Mi ;~hrll\: tf;c~,.),.~:, ': [:- -...-..--.-- "'. ." ~. ~~ ' ~ .. ---"""..:;,:;;.::--- ;;1 ;1 ~I ; ~; ~ :';~~Jj.~ ~i ~.) I ~I ~~, 'ßU, ~ ,1,~ ~ 8 r'??, ~'ii~::~)~,: ~ 9 ~~:~~ -r~'~'~:~iïk",:!¡- ., EI. ,_. .-. ";1;1: '-:.9tl -"";,":."'..:'- ~ ~i_'1~"..~'Ii~~~~I~n.¡l-.f\H_O,~,.-. .";'. '~-::'M"'. ~..::f.;,~'~, II , " "0., .:. ~~ ... ~ '. . ~o '0 ~., -., .I¡1 :11 . , ,. - "';:?.f"~",~~~="," ,:J -'¥,-'!,-,':i','- '~'."-;< ' ~)~~~'~;~ !.7 "" :'Ú~:. '~.~~37~ .,,<',;' ; "t,,"'C._. - : " ¡ "" ';' "'H,' >~.,~~~ ;:i=~ ':'rt'¡~ hi !Jr1'!:7~VP ~L...cw~ -"'-- ill ¡ ...... 1l!UI, '~""~ ,...' 76th "',... +'iú '.r'-. Federal Way Public Schools 110 ~".t' ';. -~"."'" . l r,~; - ..;.<.J~-. ~ ~ 10 .-. ," - . .. G ,.. 1,;1 Every Srudent, a Reader !';,. M'LT""'~. g. ¡ . \ ~i ...¡Ê; . . :::'~iœ' -------,,-' - I K,~..;:n:'!;rv_'i -------- '~_k~':'::" ~ II E F G ~-T ...... H m M}. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools Every Srudent. a Rader ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Code... 1 Adelaide 2 Brigadoon 3 Camelot .. Enletprise 5 Green Gables 6 Lake Dolloff 7 Lake Gt-ove 8 Lakeland 9 Marl< Twain 10 Meredith Hill 11 Mirro<Lake 12 Nautilus 13 Olympic View 14 Panther Lake 15 RalnlerView 16 Sherwood Forest 17 Silver Lake 18 Star Lake 19 Sunnycrest 20 Twin Lakes 21 Valhalla 22 Wildwood 23 Woodman! MIDDLE-SCHOOLS Code.. . c~ B-8 G-5 D-9 A-'1 G~ D~ E-9 F-4 H-5 E-6 E-5 C-7 E-8 F-10 D-8 D-7 G-3 G-2 B~ G-4 F-5 F-3 30 Iliahee 31 Kilo 32 Lakota 33 Sacajawea 34 Saghalie 35 Totem - 36 Fedefal Way Public Academy E-9 G~ D-6 E-5 C-8 G-3 E-8 2 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Code- . 3 40 Decatur 41 Federal Way 42 Thomas Jefferson 45 Todd Beame, 49, Harry S, Truman Future School Sites .. Surplus Sites .. 81 Educational Service Center F-6 - 85 Mainténance-Opefations-Tfansportation E~- Patks - Code-. 8 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN m ~ MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools Evc!}' Student, a R=kt E F -- -- G 1- H ,n u u\ W~ ~~I ,:.muT~1.+. .-1 ' -+1.(" - /::Þ;~:':' ,;:~ )~ ¡ '"1~1 jL-: ~1\ ¡~'¡P~- .' .! '~,~:- .~. i ~)~'~l.I>~~,.::':¡q~._)~ I-~'~::~..(' ~~~~~'> H.......,,~;I.. ,~..;I~hl,~'.tJ - ',' ,.~' ",c", ~~'~~,':"J;:~;¡;~~"'; ~4,^'i'~-:' ~J.~.' \- .--E:'r~t~- ~,~~¡ ;:¡ :::~,,;" ;;~ ~' ~_:~ ><1",-" ~;~ ~~! ;¡~ 3 rn ;:,..~,; '"t~" .,~' '..,,' ," ¡( ~¡Ë 3 ,~¡ ~~':¡ ~y;. ~",' L- 1, ' . ..... ~. r . ~ . " ~ ¡. \ II ~ '~,'-","~ 'r:¡'1 '8-;" J:~ f----+- WOO..OH ~ -{)~ ~ saT2S ~. ~ - - i~ tÌ';; .; " I '~~~7~::~~ ~ A:- '~~ ,~~.,;: - "~~~~: ~:4 ,'::.:,,1;: """, 1....- ~;¥9H(,~~ : ~. .,?~.~ .. ""1;"( iC~". :~4_;;¡:'~;~~~ ~-, .,NGcou!TY:1 .... ~;;?,"1.~; ~""T" 882' "';-~"""..n Parks- ~"'~ "~.f '. 'ä;& ;~)J~::::.", ..'~:- -.~ J ,:!! - 0,0, a'~' ~,"~~:'"., '. ~'.' 'It= '~~-,,~ ì:":: ~ ','T.:~~f ~._~ I A I B I c ,..,,;~~iJi ~ :"v1~:'_: .!l;.~-;.-::: -¡ ~:'~':,._.ti; , " ~ ",. t~! ~ ~I ~. - ..:-'. ". - -",...,' I' , . " . ~j! I.~....' FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON and VfCI~/N( T ~ t ~Jd-~~; / ._~~ ~ E ~ < ~ :.:'. :-'. 33f: ',:-';1- ,. :I:'.; .-. ~"¡,:. ~13.3, ~l~,', ,:. ]1 ';¡¡: -. 11 I .0 <,...~.!..'" ik-;,~-~- ! tiil~' ": "", ,.' 221ì11bi ,*::;[1Ç, ':1" ",~-,~.::..... - I SOU ,-',~-i"~¡'-JH- ,,"---- , : ,«;~:¡iì~~ t:",-,I:"" ",'Y .' '~'- r pvt" wr-:~......~~~~~ÉI ;~~ -, ,,¡I:H ~~'(~ "'~ 41 -:. :"!,,Jf.' ~~L>-~6 ~1, ,~ : ¡- I, "."._" ~:-~~.t': ;~~, .k.~:.:0'. ,'",.:,~"-:I~~~= ~"'-",::',1,~~.~~~ "~Ir-~ ;"~;W~-.'..FW',';.'.>"'_:~ 5 ,~~:: .", ;;f~~'t"";'-;' ,;"~::I; ".,~..:~~",I. d~;,': " ,'" ',~'" """ .::"" ,-, > ',¡I ~""""'- ~l 1'- '~,;;" ~i>--.;;'\~ 32 """. I,."'~..J: .- "J..I~ i ~81'~ , '~'" "" . 6 ," f¡¡I:,~. ,"'~",:~¡ =':~;~=;:::~,~~.~e:':f"" ~I~,~~ h~H ~ ?,~WJ "." i 1~!':- ::_,"":':1' ' , ;!-' -,,-, ,(40 ,t";]n I ;('~.f. ,.'(" - , -. -.. '-'-lf~ - ~' ~ NT -"-, .,':. ",- '"' ,~;'i". "', :' 85 ,- ,~" 53'OS' '~""" i . """1" I; ::;~-,-'.~:-" ,..,' r;::-; . -. FI;.?F~'. ~,x<l:;""",. "'_~n""" ~,-'i\I':".,' ,m " -"';.:::::' ; 0'\" "A-,' ~,Þ- J~I. "'~"'I -Ï'-- ," t' . A "':¡m~~ ~ .! ~.':t""" 13'&_II'~I¡'~':,:,:#I- .,::.;:~i; ~:~,,)~ ~~~/tm ¡ '-;;;'-;: ~\.'" " f '.f 7 Þ'a¡¡'¡~:: ,~,,;.: """ ~~O~"",'.j~;"~~'~~::X-f'/7 ~~nt~~ " I~~"¡ \:\ If.:,,''',:l )J'~ ~'.;". , :, ' ,: 'C.~,-o:;'~...o-.::.:j;"~;~~":',:" , ;~~n' ~' ," ~' ;~~. ,. ' - '7f/J"" " ' ., "",""~'" 6°:£" :y.*A" "ir, \, ;/.' f/¿' 0" V ~- r '" ,I,~:,i--~~;; "31~; ¿; ~" j ::::~: ~~, ~;:. r:r il~_- S 3";.' S~ ~ ""¡""" " , ':>(,~' ,J r1J='¡¡(" N . B. ." ~ ~SW'" <~:",....q W-- '~ ¡; ~,.,," -,"'::. ,~¡~ ~, .- .;0&,;1,- .--.~ ":' c"".". 2'-[::::', 'i/ "!8!! j! ~1, ff ,,::::~::"~~:Y ':¿¡' '. 1? ~ w ~ E 8=,,»~~..;:.: 'ir._;~-;- (." ~:-~ ~ ,I ~/mJ¡/' -~' 1 ~¡; ','-~~";;:~~~ ~~~.c~". \ ; 8 ~ ;I:h. -, ~u~ r" ..:,:1::1 I~( ~"""fr~ :¡ <..,,_s!')f'/~~,'-',".I:.- ':;.... ,l ;I..I;'¡ . d.. - I ~e,}53""~" "I ,.",', '/ ,,' -, 't S ~':.. ~. ~ ~, ", .' -~ : : f ,...~ -""'- '¡1'r' i .~: ~ :::J;j 'w,! 6g, "¡:- n.., :,:.., "w "";""; :.,¡:chool/' ~~~11:,~;j;'~- :- à,~', ~~ -¡ , I '~:=:::.- "-,¡;:iò< ,";", ., """'" ..,"_8' ;':~ '9 """"""""" " - -r;.~' a - '-"'..9 I . :~'ouc'~,~_:u ' ' .;,:, ";"',t',,, ¡J,!:,,~'..' \:.p' ~~fJ ,>~!~:;: ;::ff.:::-:.' '.,'."":)~:Ij~':t:~ : " : ¡~i~iif'-~~j .//£.:: " ¡';;',; '8 r'" '...' '" :- :~J';f ""~"~("""""""" kJd,"',~" . . ; ~""'..' ,., """r.,~ m. Federal Way Public Schools ,(() ~'lf. <it L~~ ~.,~-", l ,:'; J ;~. ""'.;~~,¡. ~ i 10 Every Student, a Reader I';~"'" MILTON' .' ¡ : . ~.. ¡ ~- ¡û' . . ".....,"""œ. ;; 'mgC.~n<v '\ -I, ¡ 384" 94s.'OOO 'n_..;'; ",." tLTON I P'F'œ ~ñ\ÿ- -----'c '~~""t=-H- ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Code- . 1 Adelaide 2 Brigadoon 3 Camelot 4 Enterprise 5 Green Gables 6 lake Dolloff 7 Lake Grove 8 lakeland 9 Mark Twain 10 Meredith Hill 11 Mirror lake 12 Nautilus 13 Olympic View 14 Panther lake 15 RainierVo- 16 Sherwood Forest 17 Silver lake 18 Star Lake 19 SunnycteSt 20 Twin Lakes 21 Valhalla 22 Wildwood 23 Woodmont C-6 B-8 G-5 D-9 A.7 G-8 D-8 E-9 F-4 H-5 E-6 E.5 C-7 E-8 F-10 D-8 0-7 G-3 G-2 B-6 G-4 F-5 F-3 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Code - . 30 lIIahee 31 Kilo 32 lakota 33 Sacajawea 34 Saghalie 35 Totem 36 Federal W;:y Public Academy E.9 G-6 0-8 E-5 C-ø G-3 E-8 - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Code- . 40 Decatur 41 Federal Way 42 Thomas Jefferson 45 Todd Beamer 49 Harry S, Truman C-8 E-5 G-4 E-9 F-6 Future School Sites - Surplus Sites - 81 Educational Service Center F-6 - 85 Maintenance-Oporations-Transportation E-8- I I Code-. 2 4 9 E F............. -......G J H ,~~\~~~::!,~~y~,..;-J;;~~ \~~.~',~m,U_-?~~,-", ',U,-, ~,:- , L ,\ ~p, ;1 ' "'. _._,)!i~ ::,-. ~ ~, pi! Zenil. 1:~ I'" =; u...~:'., ..' I /. ~ ~~ : \".¿ ;'~,'~ï, k~-¡ ~ ~-¡WI¡;,':,::' ~ ",~i'i: ":', ~- ¡~- =.~-~ ,->= ~ ¡'\,]:;~,.\ ~ ~.: ~L~.:~,,_\Õ':"~"-)ií M -', "'~; ~,,;'~"'f2 -"~"-" ...:~I~I "- ,<" , "E:-~,"""":::':' "~',,'^,~~:. [,': :;. ,~~~~ ~:.~ f :~.~ -' ~,,"" ;¡;.t,..- ~ ::'l,', ~"" .,~ ~§:¡¡I jl;; ...' : ¡" 3 ¡~i;'~-'m =~ ~-M,.,.'~ ~ jj~ ~ 3 ¡~~;l~~--=~'-~."" ,,:~:/..;J ,;0 ~o , ... (, J~ /,"-:-. 'r:.:;1 ,~ðt~8 ~ < ~ --W":::~~Ni, ~~})[] 'j~ ..""';¡::~rl~:¡' . ~-",:_,-,,:,~- .'i,¡"~. ~::.} ,iIl"'¡~J~' "", ~',', ~ + 4 , '"~ "". i1 " :.- 21~"~}: 4 - ; ~ ...::-.r . .,' , ; . ...' ,= it;. 7:"~' ~ : -. ,~ ."., ::,<='" ¡~ ' 81 Educational Service Center F-6 - <~. ,~ * ,~.;, ,'. . " . ¡OM" .... ,"" ,'" .,NGTY,) Parks - ~,..,.~ .~ .~:~ >~ ,':" "j" ~';~;' :'.:~,,- "~þ.:~'~'-J'J!I D I ~. . :::; 2.<-, ,', ,~, E;( ß' ¡, t; ~.~ ~. ~', ~ P'" ~i~ 5 ;..; ¡~ . I I.!-'!'~ '.1' ,,--;;: I;:¡¡;. -. y-o-: ; .- ' I A I B I ,C '-~,. ~ =l ---. "~,. . 1", ';F"t:H ~.' L'1l ,I 5 FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON and VIClj'NIT~ .I.~ r~firri'ii~~:, .." ~: '~þ' ft. 33f'::'~' '.i~~.'- ~ :'. 3, .. ~~~ '1:11 ~_. :) I NO :_~~i)i"¡I~i}-.'Ht-;"'~Þ;~~~:~!:\ ~ ~..i~);" """'~ '-:':¡¡.~iJ'" ~',..;,-".~ '" ',~ '- SO" ~.:. s,.:. '.....'1t,'., , f-"= ." 1;-:f"I~"'- '-'I'~ "",' .' ~C',-, - v"~'. ~::;;_I; -. ~;~'I~'. m~',,~,'-'(',-, "!',u',". '-,'~' ~."iiio:~... ...f" p -- I'IA~-'=E"'-1 ~ ,'-' :u..."--;C\ IE, ","1 , ..-": -~. .','.~ ~~~~¥~~\L~~:'~'¡h;:';':,u' ¡",,-~~./i"J;~~- ;9'f-',,:~~€: ~>~ ;:_,~ ~;.,f:,'Mm" 1: ¡ ...' l.L.'t;"i",". ;1"" i"~'-';I.'t:J" I '"...;.';K~."n: " . ".. ...", ",..~ æ.~ I """"'- , ~~::. (ï ::~-:\." ¡él~'\ ~/, 'I!!J "',(??):~ õ¡,~, ~I,., ,-",-,' '¡ "" ~,...- "¡'i., " . ,,'," ""I7~~i&:-,.r'-::~~~'::~;'32' ::"~hS~?~'".:;~'~~~d-81'::~:,~ffiJ . ....0' ;'¡;T""?'."'='o.;~' 6, POI~"T"r, -~,Þ~:"'::J':"':4"'~~En~:1~:(~i2~r:~""h::,'~¡;':.'P'i."~:-:.::: \,;;;:rr;-/ S220Sl"", ',\,'¡'" ~::""~rji ~'¡I "::: ........~:; -... if1; - , , , ". ~",,~ ~rf\ -..- ~ ;L:f' .~. ~ \- . . w~ ; A',' ";'~'~, -¡ .,~;':.:~~¡ ';:;":;I~~~l¡ ~i¡¡ , ~) :~:~\~\; :::: i ',' ¡ -_:~'- " ij':.J: ," :,:"../'7 ~;;...;:.~{'~' ;¿:;~.; \\\f.:.. 'G'.1.. .J'" 7 ~.~:; ,<"Jjj_.;~: "'f"'~,~:'~,;~~/ L, tn.:~r'" <,if/,~tr:¡. 0"'"'" ':" ,. . . "..,~'.. ~~i' ~'Y:ì irs 28 ,.. - ".. ~. "-".' L -. I¡'-W" N ~: B' , ': 2 N:'!,'. èI~s~:~::~""c'f!,s~,t~P,~i't ;ffi."'~~; ¡""'", "~~~,,,{J " ;.,' ~-h, ~ ,. .' c...' T'.'-i.:'y~ ,." t! wm.....w..._" ",;,:"';ft., ~¡¡ -. . .~." ".' ;:. 't:.:,.,.,.. j ~1..!."DDUAR""" .;,òf~ ", iE I W ~ E 8-=~~~~' -~'--_:~'=;--=-~.: ',,~:~ ~ <I~ - ~;l. -'..E ~~~',-~:'.'.:,tJ-'~~~ /r ;8 ~ . .~,. ',~I,~I ';J '. - ,A,(J'ïtÆ" ~,,!,,/_~'.,,:."""'étJ " f::;.; ¡ iJ - .~""',;~ :,i'~~M ¡IS;'. ,~ ",:Z."'I:!. "C: '@" n":] t..<~ '~~~, .~~ ~:-,~ s '. ...' ". :., m ~ ' .~' .:~. ft. . t." "... . ~": 'w.£. 65' . ¡:- "."'~::. ""'. "ã{"::'~' " ,'.Ji""~/i7t~., ~c~t J,. ( '-"-'-.""', -..-- I..J!"!!!f'.'~~; ,UI,' - . -.. .:;, ~¡.¡.~- $35651 l' ,.J. ,~.(t& ill,,;.< ;';1 1,.~I~ l '.-:, :' '::--::;'~:;;...::o;;:::,.-= ~~I.I ~I; ; ~~~..,.. '~'¡i~I~1 ~~., """ ~ìì'~..1:1~:~mf'~1 ¥, lÌ¡ï;"'::j, ~ ~ 9 ~~:~: ,,'~þ~ .~. ",-,. '. .~- ~~. ,.:ir 145'8 '.";~'1Y'~;'" ,.. I~.""L '-"',9 ,I -""""" "-'-- ... F'.'~' "'r:r' 1811. , '., "'" .','. ".... 1, ,-",,_,M_- , '0 .å;;r~.~~~.3;)," < -, ',' <-0;: ..¡ 09 . . . . I . <..' ~D:*~_,- :: .';' .:. ~~ -" \,'. " [Hi \. ~., ':::.~.: "ff ,.. '¡' ~,,~ :', .. .. ~ ( - "..'..,~,;-"u...= .~;j <';-;¡¡',¡- 'h-' ,-.,r, .. . y.., ',' b'> ,.. . .,~~..,. ?>, "'. , ~..~~ ~~~~:~; -' :~þ~~":;.,,, .~,~ ~~/lr,'~' ;¡;; I : D"i'r'l-::;""a.;if ,i,n >..o~;{r:" ~:.-,..:~:~~,i nj,',~:Þi';'J ~r.:~,"~"_'h".- :" . ...., ,,¿jf; ",- 316.. '" ',.,il/: ,.. ill ' ........ ~ '""";;~ ,...' ,..' t'-"-f"'..... Federa,l Way Public Schools ¡ /() ~~/~' '~,""!-,~~ - l :~:J ¡.. ..!, ,:~,_i ~,-, ~ ~. 10 EverySrudmt a Reader j it:, ~"~ ~ g~ r-' . ~, ...!Ê:I , . . ...."': ¡ ;; ....I. ."'ON <.., J.n<v '1 ( "" ¡ I 3114.. ~ ....-;:::" .m ..'...;-;' """... tCTO« I p;;œ<:õõ;a.,-' ---'G '~4:"";:""'H m ~ FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools Every $ruden', a R<ader ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Code.- . 1 Adelaide 2 Brigadoon 3 Camelot 4 Enterprise 5 Green Gables 6 ,Lake Dolloff 7 Lake Grove 8 Lakeland 9 Marl< Twain 10 Meredilh Hill 11 Mino'Lake 12 Nautilus 13 Olympic View 14 Panther Lake 15 RalnlerView 16 Sherwood Forest 17 Silver Lake 18 Star Lake 19 Sunnycrest 20 Twin Lakes 21 Valhalla 22 Wildwood 23 Woodmont ._, C-6 B-8 G-5 D-9 A-7 G-6 D-6 E-9 F-4 H,5 E-6 E-5 C-7 E-8 F.10 D-8 D-7 G.3 G.2 8-6 G-4 - F.5 F.3 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Code- . 30 IIlahee 31 Kilo 32 Lakota 33 Sacajawea 34 Saghalie 35 Totem 36 Federal Way Public Academy E-9 G-6 D-6 E-5 'C-8 G-3 E-8 2 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Code- . 40 Decatur 41 Federal Way 42 Thomas Jefferson 45 Todd Beamer 49 Hany S. Truman C-6 E..s G-4 E-9 F-6 ,- Future School Sites - Surpl~es - 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 2004 through 2009 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FIE) capacity is based on: . The number of classrooms available in each school Any special requirements at each school . In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard classoom for grades K through 2 is 20 students. For grades 3-5 the standard is 25 students. In 6th, 7th and 8th grade the standard classroom is 30 students. In sixth and seventh grade the students are scheduled with block instruction and see only two teachers for core curriculum. Teachers at this level see 60 students per day. At eighth grade, the teachers will see 90 students per day. For grades 9-12 the standard class size is 26 students. In the 2003/04 school year, 17 of the 23 elementary schools offer all day Kindergarten. This program does have capacity impacts, as the classroom is only available for one session of Kindergarten for the full day. The program will be expanded to include an all day Kindergarten program in every elementary school. The capacity calculations on page 13 reserve space for an all day Kindergarten program in each of the elementary schools. 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Adelaide - . 416 Brigadoon 470 Camelot 307 Enterprise 339 Green Gables 432 Lake Dolloff 450 Lake Grove 384 Lakeland 410 Mark Twain 454 Meredith Hill 397 MilTor Lake 339 Nautilus 435 Olympic View 384 Panther Lake 397 Rainier View 405 Sherwood Forest 454 Silver Lake 462 Star Lake 450 Sunnycrest 384 Twin Lakes 410 Valhalla 437 Wildwood 405 Woodmont 335 2004 TOTAL 9,356 Illahee 799 Kilo 799 Lakota 750 Sacajawea 774 Saghalie 694 Totem . - 734 Federal Way Public Academy 212 2002 TOTAL 4,762 I*Middle School Average I 758 I SENIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Decatur 1,476 Federal Way 1,588 Thomas Jefferson 1,544 Todd Beamer 1,364 Federal Way Public Academy 133 2004 TOTAL 6,105 I*Senior High Average I 1,493 I ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 407 Ment ~chool 16 Truman High School 200 2004 TOTAL 216 JElementary Average Notes: * Federal Way Public Academy capacity is not used in the calculated average. 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20M/OS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. - Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until pennanent facilities can be built or boundary adjus,tments can be made. When pennanent facilities become availabre,the portable(s)-is either used for other purposes such as ~torage or child care programs, or moved to another school foF an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as pennanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide .3 Brigadoon 1 Camelot 1 Enterprise 3 Green Gables 1 Lake Dolloff 2 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 Mirror Lake 4 Nautilus 1 Olympic View 2 Panther Lake 3 Rainier View 3 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake. 4 Star Lake 4 Sunnycrest 1 1 Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla 2 Wildwood 4 Woodmont 3 TOTAL 58 2 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Illahee 5 Kilo 7 Lakota 3 Sacajawea 4 Saghalie 4 Totem 5 Merit 2 30 15 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SENIOR HIGHS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Decatur 5 Federal Way 1 Thomas Jefferson 3 - TOTAL 9 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT 1 Illahee 3 TOTAL 4 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Mirror Lake 1 Sherwood Forest 1 Total 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations-for instructional supplies and materials areillso made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-'building totals-, grade level and program level to include vocational and sp'Ðcial education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a cornmon statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical infonnation to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are cornmon, student migration is factored into the analysis as it incre~es or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects infonnation on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from newhòtl~ing qr losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of thfeeÎjrojections;....:rhe report substantiated that for next year, Federal Way expects little or no growth. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5- 19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24,000 and 26,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilitieš are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes infonnation from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near tenn projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from four pennitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = .5 FTE; Middle School FTE=.989 Headcount; Senior High FTE = .939 Headcount) Total K -12 Percent School Year Elementary Middle School Senior High FTE Change 1997-98 11,123 5,073 4,082 20,278 1998-99 11,480 5,080 4,120 20,680 1.9% 1999-00 11,622 5,110 4,348 21,079 1.9% 2000-0 I 11,640 5,300 4,390 21,330 1.2% 2001-02 11,498 5,331 4,415 21,244 -0.4% 2002-03 11,202 5,448 4,405 21,055 -0.9% * 2003-04 9,127 5,518 6,327 20,972 -0.4% P1004-05 8,988 5,541 6,494 21,023 0.2% P1005-06 8,999 5,510 6,674 21,183 0.8% P1006-07 9,079 5,379 6,785 21,243 0.3% P1007-08 9,317 5,303 6,895 21,515 1.3% P1008-09 9,506 5,3/3 6,882 21,701 0.9% P2009-1O 9,636 5,379 6,883 21,898 0.9% * New Configuration Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-/2 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 23,000 2.5% 16,000 2.0% 22,000 21,000 1.5% ë 5 20,000 u 't:I ca ~ 19,000 ... GI ..Q 0 Ü 18,000 0 1.0% GI en ca GI 0.5% ~ .5 ~ 0.0% 17,000 -0.5% -1.0% 15,000 -1.5% <Q <Q <Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <g, 'fu 1b v". ??> ~ ~ ~ ~ <b ~ ~ <g, 'fÞ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C? ~ ð' ~ <J, ~ ~ ~ ~ èß, ~ >0 School Year fiiI!IIIi!iIFTE -+- Percent of Change 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity infonnation and the Student Forecast infonnation. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet fonnat, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide infonnation about what facilities are in place each year. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES Actual - - Projected - - CAPACITY 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2,009 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 20,439 20,439 20,413 21,087 21,061 21,035 21,035 Add or subtract changes to capacity Special Education Changes (2(i) (26) (2(,) (26) Truman High modernization and expansion Increase Capacity at Three High Schools New Middle School 700 Federal Way Public Academy Todd Beamer High School Adjusted Program Capacity 20,439 20,413 21,087 21,061 21,035 21,035 21,035 ENROLLMENT Basic FIE Enrollment 20,972 21,023 21,183 21,243 21,515 21,701 21,898 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAFTE) 288 288 288 288 288 288 288 Basic FIE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,684 20,735 20,895 20,955 21,227 21,413 21,610 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,394 2,394 2,394 2,394 2,494 2,594 2,462 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity .. . Add New J(Jrl.aIJle CapacIty 100 100 Deduct Porl.ahh:, CapacilY Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,394 2,394 2,394 2,494 2,594 2,594 2,462 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE CAPACITY 2,149 2,072 2,586 2,600 2,402 2,216 1,887 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Actual - - Projected - - CAPACITY 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 9,356 9,330 9,304 9,278 9,252 9,252 9,252 - 1. Special Education Changes (2(t) (26) (2(,) (2(í) Adjusted Program Capacity 9,330 9,304 9,278 9,252 9,252 9,252 9,252 . - ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 9,127 8,988 8,999 9,079 9,317 ~,506 9,636 2, Internet Academy (AAFTE) 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 9,095 8,956 8,967 9,047 9,285 9,474 9,604 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 235 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 . . Add/SlIt'tract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 I 1,450 1,450 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,685 1,798 1,761 1,655 1,417 1,228 1,098 NOTES: 1. Add Programs 2 ECEAP, 1 SBD (Severely Behavioral Disordered) and 1 Pre-School Program. This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated. 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only, The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS Actual - - Projected - - u CAPACITY 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 4,762 4,762 4,762 5,462 5,462 5,462 5,462 . I ..... ... 1. New Middle School 700 Adjusted Program Capacity 4,762 4,762 5,462 5,462 5,462 5,462 5,462 ENROLLMENT - Basic FfE Enrollment - 5,518 5,541 5,51.0 5,379 5,303 5,313 5,379 2. Internet Academy (AAFTE) 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Basic FfE Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,426 5,449 5,418 5,287 5,211 5,221 5,287 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 735 735 735 735 735 735 735 Add/Subtract portable capacity ..... ..... Add new portable capacity .... ...... ........ . .... Adjusted Portable Capacity 735 735 735 735 735 735 735 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE 4. CAPACITY 71 48 779 910 986 976 910 NOTES: 1. New Middle School to Open 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 4. Capacity for unhoused students will be acconunodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooIT 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Actual - - Projected - - CAPACITY 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 Add or subtract changes in capacity ~ Adjusted Program Capacity 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 ENROLLMENT Basic FfE Enrollment 6,327- 6,494 6,674 6,785... 6,895 6,882 6,883 1. Internet Academy (AAFfE) 164 164 164 164 164 164 164 Basic Ed without Internet Academy 6,163 6,330 6,510 6,621 6,731 6,718 6,719 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Current Portable Capacity 209 209 209 209 309 409 409 3. Add new portable capacity 100 100 Adjusted Portable Capacity 209 209 209 309 409 409 409 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE 4. CAPACITY 367 200 20 9 (1) 12 11 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 3. Add Portable Capacity 4. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classroorr Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students. Federal Way Public Academy may ~ to include grades 10 and II. This would provide program for additional high school students. 23 Page 1] ven Wang - CFP Pg24.doc FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To detennine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a fonnula was established. This fonnula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The fonnula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi~family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was detennined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units which were constructed in the last five (5) years. The multi-family yield is derived from an average of other King County school districts. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. ~ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. ~ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 45); this is a negotiated purchase price. Single Family Units Multi-Family Units Plan Year 2004/05 Collection Year 2004 $2868. $ 905. Plan Year 2003/04 Collection Year 2003 $3269. 940. kf FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DEVELOPMENT - 03) Hunter's Glen 03) Bluffs at Redondo 02) Cedar Heights Estates 02) Silverwood 01) High Point Park 01) Woodbrook 00) Village at Star lake 00) Dash Pointe 99) Greenfield Park (99) Heritage Woods Total Student Generation Number 01 Single Fam fly Dwellings 38 30 38 68 16 93 26 31 27 111 478 Number 01 Multi-Family Dwellings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn Issaquah Kent Lake Washinqton Northshore Average STUDENT GENERATION NEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS Single Family Student Generation Number 01 Elementary Students 5 13 17 18 6 24 12 20 9 26 150 Number 01 Middle School Students 10 6 9 15 2 7 7 5 5 12 78 Multi-Family Student Generation Midd hool 25 Number 01 Senior High Students 6 5 6 13 7 16 8 6 2 12 81 Hi' Elementary Student FAr.tnr 0 . 0.: . . 0 : .. 0 0 o. ' 0 " 0 ." . 0...' , o. '.'. - ._, Middle School Student F:I,:~"r .--- 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. 0 . ¡ 0 " . " 0 ..- .. --.. Senior High Student Factor 0.1579 0,1667 0.1579 0.1912 0.4375 0.1720 0.3077 0.1935 0.0741 0.1081 Total Student Ft'.l:!or 0'.6 0": 0 0 -.": 1 -.- 0 ---5 -.-- 0 "5 -.,.-- 0 . '4 -'--- 1 . ,- 5 - -.- 1.\JuuO 0.5926 0.4505 IrtO;3'f~B.;< ,', .1):1632 'QJj~~$~ 'diß4i1'1 :hool 3 4 4 6 7 IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Facility A Cost I A Facility C Student Factor SFR Elementary Middle School Sr High creage cre apaclty 0.00 $0 407 0.3138 0.1190 $0 $0 ................................. ................................. """""""""""""""'" ...................-............ ................................. 2 \.80 .............~.g.?~?. 758 0.1632 0.0420 $412 $106 ................................. ................................. ................................. """""""""""'.........' 4\.20 $82,733 1,493 0.1695 0.0530 $387 $121 TOTAL $799 $227 School Construction Cost: % Penn Fac.l T IS F Elementary Middle School Sr High ota )q t ost apaclty 96.32% $0 407 0.3138 0.1190 $0 $0 ................................. """""""""""""""'" ............................,.... .............................,... 96.32% ....~}.~.¡~.~.~!.2~~.. 758 0.1632 0.0420 $3,806 $979 ................................. """""""""""""""'" ................................. ................................. 96.32% $46,468,638 1,493 0.1695 0.0530 $5,081 $1,589 TOTAL .. $8,887 $2,568 Facility C Student Factor SFR Facility C Temporary Facility Cost: % Temp Fac. T IS Elementary Middle School Sr High ota sq Ft ost lze R FR FR MFR 3.68% SO 25 0.3138 0.1190 $0 $0 ",'.m......................... ................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. 3.68% SO 25 0.1632 0.0420 $0 $0 ................................. ................................. ................................. """""""""""""""'" ................................. 3.68% $82,151 25 0.1695 0.0530 $20 $6 TOTAL $20 $6 Facility C Student Factor SF Facility S' State Matching Credit Calculation: Boeck Cost! Sq. Ft. S F S d Elementary Middle School New Sr High sq t tu ent atc $129.81 80 0.00% 0.3138 0.1190 $0 $0 ....,.........................,.. ................................. ................................. """""""""""""""'" .....................,........... $129.81 110 0.00% 0.1632 0.0420 $0 $0 ................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. S129.81 120 59.97% 0.\695 0.0530 $1,583 $495 Total $1,583 $495 State M h Student Factor SFR Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 2004) Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2004) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years Amortized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream Student Factor MFR Cost! SFR Cost! MFR Student Factor MFR Cost! SFR Cost! MFR Student Factor M Cost! S Cost! Student Factor MFR Cost! SFR Cost! MFR SFR MFR ......~.~Pß~.2....... $44,571 ................................. 4,35% 4.35(% ................................. ................................. ....~.!~ZQ~¡?'~.~..... ......~~~.~.¡~.2L..... 10 10 ................................. ................................. $1040 $1.40 $2,387 $497 Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost Permanent Facility Cost Temporary Facility Cost State Match Credit Tax Payment Credit Sub-Total 50% Local Share Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences $ 799 $ 227 $ 8,887 $ 2,568 $ 20 $ 6 $ (1,583) $ (495) $ (2,387) $ (497) $ 5,737 $ 1,809 $ 2,868 $ 905 $ 2,868 $ 905 ~ ~Impact Fee ~ I¥Å ~ Þb . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Facility A Elementary Middle School Sr High creage cre apaclty 0.00 .........,.,.............J9.. 407 0.3138 0.1190 $0 $0 """""""""""""""'" ................................. """""""""""""""'" """""""""""""""'" 21.80 ............J~??~~?. 758 0.1632 0.0420 $412 $106 .................................. """""""""""""""'" """"""".............,..". """""""""""""""'" 41.20 $82,733 1,493 0.1695 0.0530 $387 $121 , TOTAL $799 $227 Cost I A Facility C Student Factor SFR School Construction Cost: % Perm Fac.! T talS F Elementary Middle School Sr High 0 )q t ost . apaclty S R MFR 96.32% .........................J9.. 407 0.3138 0.1190 $0 $0 """""""""""""""'" ...............................,. """""""""""""""'" 96.32% ....g~.,~.~.~!.~~.§.. 758 0.1632 0.0420 $4,138 $1,065 ................................. ...,............................. """""""""""""""'" ................................. 96.32.% $46,468,638 1,493 0.1695 0.0530 $5,081 $1,589 TOTAL- $9,219 $2,654 Facility C Studpnt Factor SFR Facility C Temporary Facility Cost: % Temp Fac. T alS F Elementary Middle School Sr High ot iq t ost lze FR MFR 3.68% $0 25 0,3138 0.1190 $0 $0 """"""""""""""""" """""""""""""""'" .....,.....".........,.......... ............................."" ........,......................., 3.68% $0 25 0.1632 0.0420 $0 $0 ............,...................., ................................, """""""""""""""'" ................................. ................................. 3.68% $82,151 25 0.1695 0.0530 $20 $6 TOTAL $20 $6 Facility C Student Factor SFR Facility S' State Matclùng Credit Calculation: Boeck Cost! Sq. Ft. S F S d Elementary Middle School New Sr High )q t tu ent atc $129.81 80 0.00% 0.3138 0.1190 $0 $0 ............."................... """""""""""""""'" """""""""""""""'" ................................, """"""'................".. $129.81 110 0.00% 0.1632 0.0420 $0 $0 """""""""""""""'" """""""""""""""'" """""""""""""""'" """""""""""""""'" ................................. $129.81 120 59.97% 0.1695 0.0530 $1,583 $495 Total $1,583 $495 State M h Student Factor SFR Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 2004) Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2004) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years AIIlOrtized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences $ 799 $ 227 $ 9,219 $ 2,654 $ 20 $ 6 $ (1,583) $ (495) $ (2,387) $ (497) $ 6,069 $ 1,895 $ 3,034 $ 947 : 947 ij $ 3,034 $ 26 Mitigation Fee Sununary Site Acquisition Cost Permanent Facility Cost Temporary Facility Cost State Match Credit Tax Payment Credit Sub-Total 50% Local Share ~Impact Fee Student Factor MFR Cost! SFR Cost! MFR Student Factor MFR Cost! F Cost! Student Factor MFR Cost! S Cost! Student Factor MFR -- . ""'. Cost! SFR Cost! MFR SFR MFR ...J~!}!.~~~....... .....J~!~D......... 4.35% 4.35% """""""""""""""'" ..................,............... ....E:29.~!.Z.?_~..... ....J~.?~!.?2L..... 10 10 ....................,............ """"""""""""""""" $1.40 $1.40 $2,387 $497 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OFi(1HANGES FROM THE 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - - The 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2003/04 Plan and the 2004/05 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN .." SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2004/2009 SECTION ill - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2004/05 school year. Middle School capacity changes reflect the transition from Junior High to Middle School and Board adopted program changes for the middle school program. Elementary capacity includes space for AU Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary schooL Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2004 through 2009. Enrollment history and projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factfus. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. ~ " ,- .;~""'-' 28 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FA.CILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2002/03 TO 2004/05 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or ~dded based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 25. SITE ACQUISITION COSTS The negotiated purchase price for the Todd Beamer High School site was $80,000 per acre. This is the base line cost for acreage. The assessed valuation for the Federal Way Public Academy land was $521,000 at the time of purchase. The calculated cost per acre in the impact fee calculation is a weighted calculation using the $80,000 per acre for Todd Beamer and the assessed valuation at the time of purchase for the Federal Way Public Academy. Federal Way Public Academy is a 3-acre site. The grade span for this facility is grades 6-10. Middle school accounts for 60% of the cost; senior high is 40%. Todd Beamer: 40 x $80,000. = $3,200,000. FWPA $ 208,600 (40% of $521,500, 1.2 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $3,408,600 Cost/Acreage $3,408,600/41.2 = $82,733 Cost per acre for High School Middle School: 20 x $80,000 = $1,600,000 FWP A $ 312,900 (1.8 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $1,912,900 Cost/Acreage $1,912,900/21.8 = $87,747 cost per acre SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS Todd Beamer construction costs is $44,500,000. The costs for the new middle school are set at $15,400,000. The cost for Federal Way Public Academy (exclusive of land) is $4,921,594 The Federal Way Public Academy costs are split 60% to middle school and 40% to senior high in the impact fee calculation. 29 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2002LD3 TO 2004/05 IMP ACT FEE Item - Percent of Permanent Facilities Percent Temporary Facilities Temporary Facility Cost Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft State Match Average Assessed Value Capital Bond Interest Rate Property Tax Levy Rate Fromffo 96.41 to 96.32% 3.59% to 3.68 % $79,695. to $82,151. $114.88 to $129.81 60.91 % to 59.97% SFR- $203,630 to $213,859 MFR- $51,340 to $44,571 4.69% to 4.35% $1.46 to $1.40 Comment Report #3 aSPI Updated portable inventory A verage cost of temporary facilities in the 2002/03 calendar year. Change per aSPI Change per aSPI Per Puget Sound Educational Service District (ESD 121) Market Rate King County Treasury Division 30 ~ CITY OF" ~~ Federal Way DATE: TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: July 29, 2004 Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee Maryanne Zukowski, P.E. ~ David H. M~anager City Center AC~S~ Study - Briefing #3 Project Update BACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way, in conjunction with our project partners, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Federal Highways Administration (FHWA), puget Sound Regional Council (PSRe), and the additional supporting agencies (the "Core Team") are performing a feasibility study to determine viable access solutions to the safety issues and the congestion at the interchange of S 320th Street and Interstate 5 access to the Federal Way City Center. The interchange is experiencing significant congestion for many hours of the day and is currently at capacity. If a successful and viable access solution is found, Federal Way will proceed in developing an Access Point Decision Report (APDR) to submit to the WSDOT. With City and State approval the report would go to the FHWA. An APDR is the initial step required by FHWA before changing an interstate highway interchange. This is the third in a series of Land Use and Transportation Committee (LUTe) briefing updates of the current schedule and milestones accomplished to date for the project. Briefing #1 presented the Public Involvement and Communications Plan, the Project Work Plan, the Purpose and Need statement, the project issues map, and the study area of the project. Briefing #2 was presented by CH2M Hill, the engineering consultant, and provided an update from project beginning to the development of 47 project alternatives in this project study. Briefing #3 presents: . An Overview of the Evaluation Process of the project. The Levell Fatal Flaw Screening results of 15 alternatives remaining from the first 47 alternatives will be presented in Powerpoint. Level 2 Screening process and status of the Consultant Team, the Core Support Team, and the Stakeholder Team will be presented. Level 3 Screening process expectations for the next steps will be presented. Additional work item requests from the Stakeholder Team will be presented and is contained within this memo as noted below for: 1. Additional Alternatives Analysis 2A. Additional Public Involvement completed to date. 2B. Additional Public Involvement Campaign . . . . An Overview of the Evaluation Process of the Project AGURE 1 - EVALUA nON PROCESS ADDmONAL WORK ITEM REQUESTS FROM THE STAKEHOLDER TEAM As part of this project, representing the public interest is the 32-member Stakeholder Team. The Stakeholder Team represents a wide and full range of interest and expertise. That experience ranges from former council members, ex-City Managers, City staff, Public Safety & Fire Department representatives, Chamber of Commerce President, business owners, private interest groups, and citizens. 1. Additional Alternatives Analysis The Stakeholder Team is requesting to add alternative ideas, modify existing alternatives, and bring back screened alternatives. The request would add costs to the current contract with CH2M Hill and Core Support Team to perform the requested additional work. The Core Support Team must also approval the addition of alternatives to this process. The project study has completed the Levell Fatal Flaw Screening Analysis, beginning with 47 alternatives as prepared by the Core Support Team and additional experts. Many of the alternatives evaluated to date were prepared and submitted by the citizens and staff. The Levell screening resulted in 15 remaining alternatives to be further filtered through to the Level 2 screening. Level 3, the next screening, further reduces the alternatives to a preferred alternative(s). If funding were available, the preferred alternative(s) would then be brought forward into the environmental review process, most likely the Environmental Assessment (EA), and/or Environmental Impact Study (EIS). If approved, the preferred alternative would then be included in an APDR review request. The Stakeholder Team has formally requested to forward one of the deleted options to the Level 2 analysis (please see the attached EXHIBIT A). A similar alternative remains in the Level 2 screening designated as H4 Ring Road (please see the attached EXHIBIT B). Staff is requesting that this alternative Due to the similarities of the two alternatives, staff is seeking Council direction on the Stakeholder Team's request. The estimated scope and budget increase to the current contract for each new or revised alternative is: $12,500 to $17,500. 2A. Additional Public Involvement Completed to Date. The Stakeholder Team has requested additional public involvement beyond what was provided for in the Consultant's contract's scope of work for this project. The current contract's scope of work provides for agency and community coordination that includes a Public Involvement and Communications Plan. Implementation of that plan per the contract is listed below. The purpose of the additional public involvement request by the Stakeholders is to engage the community in the City Center Access Project to a greater extent. Potential benefits from this request: . A community of citizens and businesses more aware, informed, and involved with the development and endorsement of a preferred solution(s). . A higher level of consensus and ownership within the community creating needed momentum for the project to obtain additional funding; further ensuring a defensible solution. The current scope of work for the public involvement and communications plan was based upon previous City of Federal Way transportation projects and the Triangle Study. Task 2 of the current consultant contract -"Agency and Community Coordination" provides a budget of $49,103.00 and includes the following products: . 2 project flyers . 2 newsletter articles . 6 Stakeholder project meetings . 6 lUTC or Council briefings . 2 public open houses For the first public open house, anticipated responsibilities of staff included the following tasks: . Printing and distributing 4,000 flyers to: . Chamber of Commerce . Public Library . Project Signs . City Hall . Ten local agencies (the Cities of Milton, Kent, Des Moines, and Tacoma; Sound Transit, WSDOT, King County Transportation, King County Metro, WSDOT HQ, and the WSDOT Urban Corridors Office) . Lakehaven Utility District . The Commons . City of Federal Way Police Department . Federal Way Fire Department Press Releases Notification on the City of Federal Way Web Page Spring City Newsletter Article Advertisement of the first Open House in the Mirror and the Tacoma News Tribune Meeting with the Mirror representative in person and over the telephone to develop three articles on the Public Open House and the project Multiple e-mail distribution with flyer attachments . . . . . . To date, staff has completed additional public involvement at the request of the Stakeholder Team. The Federal Way Chamber sent a formal written request to represent the Stakeholder Team's request for additional education and involvement of the project process. They further requested to slow the pace of the project study's schedule to accommodate the additional education. Added support by staff is noted below: . Public Involvement Communication Plan revisions in schedule and scope. Five additional Stakeholder Meetings and work sessions for a total of 11 meetings. Additional staff hours to support five additional meetings and to extend the hours of the six meeting scheduled under the current contract. Additional response to comments from the Stakeholder Team. . . . 28. Additional Public Involvement Campaign In addition to the support noted above, the Stakeholder Team has requested that specific additional public involvement be performed. The request is for additional media advertising, marketing analysis, one-on- one meetings and contacts, additional public forum presentations, and targeting response and involvement from the public at large. This also requires a revision and a supplement to Task 2.1 Public involvement and Communication plan of the consultant's contract. Staff has prepared a list of work tasks and an estimate of additional consultant costs to perform the additional services requested, as noted below: . Supplement and Revise the current Public Involvement and Communication (The plan is a report of tasks and schedule of activities linked to other portions of the project outlining agendas and activities.) $6,000.00 . Public involvement outreach and Additional Marketing Analysis and Targeting. (The scope would be setting up meetings, attending meetings with business owners, agencies, and private groups, knocking on doors, and presenting information at other meetings. The scope would also include evaluation of demographic/employment information and previous City of Federal Way Public Involvement Plans and target areas that requires a greater success rate needs in reaching Public audience.) $27,000 - $40,000 . Additional (4) Public Forums and Presentations $21,400 . Citywide mailing of project information to 40,000.00 residences $40,000 . Response to comments, by phone, e-mail, and letters $12,000 $106,400 - $119,400 Total budget estimate of cost of this request is: 2C. Videotaping Stakeholder Meetings, Public Open Houses, and Producing those Tapings for Viewing to City Web Site and Cable Access Network Staff has also received a specific request in conjunction with additional public involvement for videotaping Stakeholder meetings, public open houses and producing those tapings for viewing to City web site and Cable Access Network. The Stakeholder Team has not reached a consensus on moving forward with this activity. Proponents For: . Members of the Stakeholders Team feel it is necessary to get the attention of citizens in the community as their involvement is needed for the project. To date, it has been difficult to engage the public Supporting this issue is that people are busy and have a tendency to ignore issues unless a personal cord is struck and impacts their wallet, or family. The Stakeholders suggest broadcasting their meetings and public open houses so that viewers can watch and listen to discussions. This would provide an opportunity to witness the thoughts and public discussions of their fellow local citizens. . Public support would be generated by this media outreach, thus building consensus of the project and increasing community understanding and support. . This activity will assist in bringing awareness to the public of this project in the early stages. The activity will also enable airing public concerns early in the project and help address those concerns. . The support activity brings project process awareness to the public and contributes to the defense of the project. Proponents Against: . One concern is that based on experience, videotaping can be counter-productive. Another concern is the cost versus number of viewers reached. . Within the group there is a strong opposition against videotaping and replaying the meetings. The concern is that the meetings are too long, and would change the tenor of open discussion. It has been expressed that some feel it is inappropriate to permanently record the meetings which are open to the public. . Concern was expressed that videotaping should have been part of the discussion when people were asked/applied to join the Team. . Concern about beginning the videotaping in the middle of the process would be confusing to the public; the taping should have begun at the beginning of the discussions. Members feel that understanding the study process has been very challenging and that the public would most likely feel confused at this point. . Concern was raised that videotaping tends to temper spontaneity and candidness. Another concern was, "Who is going to take the time to edit this?" "Is this a good use for City resources?" "Minutes or quotations would seem to be just as effective, but I have no reason to oppose this if that is what the group wants". . There was further concern regarding presentations of very complicated traffic information that may be misinterpreted by the public if not properly edited for explanations. Furthermore, there was concern that the public would not be able to ask questions on material presented. Currently, the staffing levels and the consultant's contract do not provide for additional work on producing, editing, and videotaping the Stakeholder meetings and public open houses. The in-house cost estimate for six Stakeholder meetings and one public oPen house is $7,770. It is assumed that the additional budget in Item 2A would be adequate to provide for response to any additional public comment from the videotaped meetings. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is seeking direction from City Council on how to proceed with Stakeholder requests. If the City Council elects to expand the project study scope and budget, staff recommends funding additional costs with the 2004 ending fund balance from the Public Works Department. cc: Project File Day File K:\LUTC\2004\revised oty Center Access Study Project Update Briefing #3.doc EXHIBIT A - MODIFIED F4 FROM ORIGINAL 47 OPTIONS PRESENTED IN LEVEL 1 SCREENING ¡ 8.~81 &1tlt,1II., .. t ~ 8.11""8. a._Ill !L' t . . \ . \ ì~¡ I I ~ , ¡ 8.-81. .. t I .. . I LEGEND 8.~8L EXISTING PROPOSED t::=::J REMOVED STRUCllJRE 0 151 1500 P""'\-.-- 'Sc:iíIoill1Fe81 2250 . CITY' OF FEDERAL WAY CITY CENTER ACCESS STUDY TM-6: RANGE OF OPTIONS /@ N312 HALF DIAMNDSB M320 NB L312.13.324,23 RING RD CH2MHIu. . '. - EXHIBIT B - RING ROAD S. 3O8th Sl S. 316th Sl .c: :¡ 0 (f) õ: -£'; -£'; ::J 0 (f) ~ J: 0 £ 0 <II Q. .----- LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED REMOVED c:::=:::J STRUCTURE 0 soo 1000 r-..- - Scale In Feet 1500 , CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY CENTER ACCESS STUDY TM-?: FATAL FLAW SCREENING (f) .; > « :; co . ,. S. 304th St ê (f) ~ « £; co C'I " ., ., (f) .; ~ :; 0 C'I ., " ., ." ., ." . -".. .. . . SIGel take" ., '" P~r1<... ., .. .,. _. ., .. .. ., " (f) ,,; ~ 1? M '" ., ., " " " (f) .; ~ .., c '" M ., ., ., SeaTac Mall S. 324th Sl A variant of the the H4 Option featuring a Ring road in the counter-clockwise direction will also be considered. S. 333rd Sl ~ 8 L316 WB L324 EB COUPLET CH2MHILl.. Local Adoption of State Building Code Information to be Presented by Mary Kate Martin, Building Official