HomeMy WebLinkAboutDNS and SEPA Checklist40k
C4TY OF i
Federal Way
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
2018 Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review
(Non -Project Action)
Files: 19-101677-SE & 17-105423-UP
Description: The City of Federal Way is undertaking a periodic review of its Shoreline Master Program (SMP), as required by the
Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA) (RCW 90.58), which requires local jurisdictions to review such regulations
every eight years. The city adopted its current SMP in 2011. Federal Way's SMP guides construction and development along the
shorelines of Puget Sound, Steel Lake, North Lake, and the northwestern portion of Lake Killarney. The city has predesignated
shorelines along Star Lake, Five Mile Lake, Lake Geneva, Lake Dolloff, and the remaining portion of Lake Killarney.
The focus of this periodic review is on consistency with changes to state law made since its adoption in 2011. The review also
will address consistency with the city's comprehensive plan and development regulations. The goal is to adopt the updated SMP
by June 30, 2019. The city's periodic review proposes to:
• Revise or add several definitions.
• Incorporate an updated Environmentally Critical Areas Ordinance, repealing the reference to FWRC 15.10 and
referencing FWRC 19.145.
• Update language consistent with recent changes in state laws and rules.
• Add a section on shoreline setback vegetation conservation standards.
• Ensure consistency with other city plans and regulations.
Applicant: Community Development Department — Planning Division
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
Staff Contact: Principal Planner Margaret Clark — 253-835-2646, mar aret.clark cit affederalwa .cam
The city's Responsible Official has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was
made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the city.
A completed environmental checklist and supporting documents are posted to the city's SMP update website at
hi!Rs-://www.c.ilyoffederalway.com/node/3819 and are available for review at the City of Federal Way Community
Development Department (Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8f Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003, 253-835-7000), from
8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 30 days from the date of
issuance. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on May 13, 2019. Unless modified by the city, this determination will
become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the city's determination may file an appeal with the
city within 21 days of the above comment deadline. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk
(address above), no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 3, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the
determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Responsible Official: Brian Davis
Title: Director of Community Development/SEPA Official
Address: 33325 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Date Issued: April 12, 2019 Signature: &�� 411�_
K:\Shoreline Master Program\2019 Periodic Update\SEPA\DNS.docx.
Department of Community Development
33325 8th Avenue South
CITY OF• •- Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
Fe d e ra I W v 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
www.cityoffederal_wa +
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of Checklist
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for Applicants
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with
an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable " or "does not
apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also
attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these
questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts ofyour proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the
existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The
checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an
adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible
f o r the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B, Environmental Elements, that do not contribute
meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
Page 1 of 17
CITY of
Federal Way
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Federal Way Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review
2. Name of applicant:
Federal Way Community Development Department
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Department of Community Development
33325 81h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
ww xitvoffuleralway.rnin
Principal Planner Margaret Clark, 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003; 253/835-2646
4. Date checklist prepared:
February 13, 2019
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Department of Ecology
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Updates to the Federal Way Shoreline Master Program (SMP) will be completed by June 30, 2019.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with
this proposal? If yes, explain.
This is a non -project action proposal. The city is updating the policies and regulations of its SMP to ensure
consistency with related state and city policies and regulations. Site -specific applications for development
within shoreline jurisdiction are considered separate actions and will be reviewed for compliance with the
SMP at the time of application.
List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal.
The Shoreline Master Program Periodic Update Ecology Checklist; Federal Way Inventory and
Characterization Plan, prepared June 2007; Federal Way Revised Code Chapters 19.142, Flood Damage
Prevention and 19.145 Environmentally Sensitive Areas.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
This is a non -project action. If there are any property -specific development applications pending they are
vested to the current policies and regulations of the SMP.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Page 2 of 17
CITV OF �s
Federal Way
Department of Community Development
33325 8`h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www.cityoffede_ral way.com
The City of Federal Way and the Washington State Department of Ecology must approve the changes to the
SMP prior to adoption of this proposal.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain
aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may
modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.)
This is a non -project action and contains proposed policies and regulations that are applied citywide within
the identified shoreline jurisdiction of the City of Federal Way. The project area is the shoreline jurisdiction
within city limits and in the city's Potential Annexation Area (Exhibits A, B, and Q.
Regulatory changes include:
• Updating the SMP to ensure consistency with changes in policy and regulation affecting shoreline
management made by the state legislature since 2011 when the SMP was last updated. These changes
are outlined in the Washington State Department of Ecology SMP Periodic Update checklist.
• Updating the SMP to ensure consistency with regulations adopted by the City of Federal Way that
affect environmentally sensitive areas and flood hazard areas.
• Adding vegetation conservation standards within the SMP to provide clarity for applicants.
• Changing bulkhead standards to be the minimum necessary to afford relief from the existing
requirement to be a maximum height of one foot above the elevation of mean higher high water on
tidal waters.
This includes the waters and all land within 200 feet landward of the ordinary high-water mark (OHWM) of
the Puget Sound, Steel Lake, North Lake, and the northwest portion of Lake Killarney within city limits, as
well as Star Lake, Lake Dolloff, Lake Geneva, Five Mile Lake, and the remaining portion of Lake Killarney
within the city's Potential Annexation Area and associated wetlands of all of the waterbody's listed above.
Refer to Exhibits A, B, and C for SMP jurisdiction.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist.
Refer to Exhibit D for areas under shoreline jurisdiction.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site:
(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
N/A, this is a non -project action. Answers provided below are intended to give a general description of
conditions within SMP jurisdiction.
Page 3 of 17
Department of Community Development
riry o� �-r 33325 8'h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
Fpdera l Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
w ww,ci tyaffederal way.coni
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
There is a variety of terrain located within the SMP jurisdiction, but the steepest slope is estimated in excess
of 40 percent along portions of the Puget Sound shoreline.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you
know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term
commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils.
Soils within the SMP jurisdiction vary, but mostly include sand and gravel, clay, and peat and muck in
associated wetlands.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
Based on the city's Critical Areas Map, there are landslide and erosion hazard areas within the shoreline
jurisdiction (Exhibit E).
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any
filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which does not include any filing, excavation, or grading.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which does not include any clearing or construction.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
N/A, this is a non -project action.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action. Future project specific actions will be subject to environmental review as
required by the SEPA Rules, and will be evaluated in accordance with all plans, policies, rules, and
regulations adopted as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or
deny proposed actions. In addition, when future projects are submitted, any erosion -related impacts created
during clearing and construction activities will be mitigated in compliance with the 2009 King County
Surface Water Manual (KCSWM), as amended by the city. This requires any erosion -related impacts created
during clearing and construction activities to be addressed according to a Temporary Erosion Sedimentation
Control Plan (TESL), which is a standard part of engineering review and approval.
2. Air
N/A, this is a non -project action. None of the questions in this section apply.
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation,
and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not result in any emissions to the air.
Page 4 of 17
CITY OF 'A
Federal Way
Department of Community Development
33325 Bch Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www.citvofledci aIway.cojn
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not be affected by any off -site sources of emissions or odor.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and there would be no emissions or other impacts to the air; therefore, no
measures are proposed.
3. Water
N/A, this is a non -project proposal. Answers provided below are intended to give a general description of
conditions within the SMP jurisdiction.
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
N/A, this is a non -project action. By definition, the SMP addresses marine shorelines, year-round streams with
flows over 20 cubic feet per second, lakes more than 20 acres in size, and associated wetlands and floodplains.
Please see Exhibits A-D for identified areas of shoreline jurisdiction.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
N/A, this is a non -project action. Impacts to surface water resources will be evaluated on a project -by -project basis
for future construction projects.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which does not include filling or dredging surface water or wetlands.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not require surface water withdrawals or diversions.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
NA, this is a non -project action. However, there are flood plain areas located in portions of the shorelines
(refer to Exhibits F-1 and F-2).
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not discharge any waste materials to surface waters.
Page 5 of 17
CITY OF
Federal I►IIlay
b. Ground Water:
Department of Community Development
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www.6 tyo f 1Jcdcral wa Y.coi
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a
general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well.
Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not withdraw drinking water from wells.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be
served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not discharge any waste material into the ground from septic tanks
or other sources.
c. Water runoff (including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If
so, describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not result in any runoff.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the shoreline
jurisdiction area.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern
impacts, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action. When future projects are submitted, any water -related impacts will be mitigated in
compliance with the city -adopted 2009 KCSWM, as amended by the city.
4. Plants
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
N/A, this is a non -project action. However, a variety of vegetation can be found in the shoreline jurisdiction area.
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
X shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
Page 6 of 17
44k
C}7y OF
Federal Way
Department of Community Development
33325 81h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
www.ci tyof Federal way.eom
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops
X Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
X water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
X other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
N/A, this is a non -project action. When a specific application is submitted, the kind and amount of vegetation to be
removed or altered will depend on city requirements, which would be reflected in an approved landscape plan.
c. • List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NA, this is a non -project action. It is unknown whether there are any threatened or endangered species on or
near the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on
the site, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and no landscaping is proposed to be done.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
NA, this is a non -project action. It is unknown whether there are any noxious weeds or invasive species along
the shorelines.
5. Animals
N/A, this is a non -project action. Answers provided below are intended to give a general description of
conditions within the SMP jurisdiction.
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site. Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
N/A, this is a non -project action. A variety of birds, mammals, and fish are known to have habitat within the
SMP jurisdiction. Based on the City of Federal Way Priority Habitats & Species and Natural Heritage and
Wildlife Data and Critical Areas Map, eagles, water fowl, and blue/green heron have been observed on
portions of the shoreline.
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
N/A, this is a non -project action. It is unknown whether there are any threatened or endangered species on or
near the shorelines.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Federal Way is located within the Pacific Flyway migration route utilized by waterfowl migrating north into
Alaska and northern Canada.
Page 7 of 17
Z
CITY of
Federal Way
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Department of Community Development
33325 8'h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www.cityof cdeial way.com
N/A, this is a non -project action and no measures are proposed to preserve or enhance wildlife.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
It is unknown whether there are any invasive animal species on or near the site.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
N/A this is a non -project proposal. None of the questions in this section apply.
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
N/A, this is a non -project action and there would be no energy needed.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and there is no need for energy conservation features.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
N/A, this is a non -project action. However, the entire shoreline jurisdiction is located within the Tacoma
Smelter Plume area.
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and
design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located
within the project area and in the vicinity.
N/A, this is a non -project action and there are no hazardous chemicals/conditions associated with it.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the
project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project.
N/A, this is a non -project action and there is no associated construction.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
N/A, this is a non -project action and no emergency services are required.
Page 8 of 17
CITY OF
Federal Way
Department of Community Development
33325 81h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www.ciiyoffWuralway unn
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and no measures are necessary to reduce or control environmental
health hazards.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not be affected by any noise in the area.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-
term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what
hours noise would come from the site.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not result in any noise.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and no measures are needed to reduce or control noise impacts.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
N/A, this is a non -project action. Answers provided below are intended to give a general description of
conditions within the SMP jurisdiction.
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect
current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
Land uses include residential, recreational, office, multi -family, public institutional uses, and vacant land
(Exhibit G).
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How
much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other
uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres
in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use?
N/A, this is a non -project action. It is unknown if any land in the shoreline jurisdiction area has been used as
working farmlands or working forest lands
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land
normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of
pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
N/A, this is a non -project action. There are no working farms or forest land in the shoreline jurisdiction area.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
This is a non -project action. Refer to responses under Section B.9.a of this checklist.
Page 9of17
CITY OF �ft;
Federal 'Way
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
N/A, this is a non -project action and no structures will be demolished.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Department of Community Development
33325 8"` Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www.cit offuicralwa .com
The zoning classifications by shoreline jurisdictional area are as follows in City limits (Exhibit H):
• Puget Sound: SE— 1 Unit / 5 Acres, RS35.0 —1 Unit / 35,000 SF, RS 15.0 —1 Unit / 15,000 SF,
RS9.6 —1 Unit / 9,600 SF, RS7.2 —1 Unit / 7,200 SF
• Steel Lake: RS7.2 — 1 Unit / 7,200 SF, RS5.0 —1 Unit / 5,000 SF, RM1800 -1 Unit / 1,800 SF
• North Lake: RS9.6 — 1 Unit / 9,600 SF, OP-1 — Office Park 1, CP-1 — Corporate Park
• Lake Killarney (NW Portion): OP-1 — Office Park 1, RS9.6 —1 Unit / 9,600 SF
The zoning classifications by shoreline jurisdictional area are as follows in unincorporated King County (city
Potential Annexation Areas):
• Five Mile Lake: R-4 — 4-12 dwelling units per acre
• Lake Killarney (remaining portion): R-4 — 4-12 dwelling units per acre
• Lake Geneva: R-4- (4-12 dwelling units per acre)
• Dolloff Lake: R-4, R-6 - (4-12 dwelling units per acre)
• Star Lake: R-6- (4-12 dwelling units per acre)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The Comprehensive Plan Designations within city limits are as follows (Exhibit I):
• Puget Sound: Single Family — Low Density Residential; Single Family — Medium Density
Residential; Single Family — High Density Residential, Steel Lake: Single Family - High
Density Residential; Multi -Family Residential
• North Lake: Corporate Park; Single Family - High Density Residential; Office Park
• Lake Killarney (NW Portion): Office Park; Single Family — High Density Residential
The Comprehensive Plan Designations by shoreline jurisdictional area are as follows in unincorporated King
County (Potential Annexation Areas):
• Five Mile Lake: Urban Residential, Medium
• Lake Killarney (remaining portion): Urban Residential, Medium
• Lake Geneva: Urban Residential, Medium; and Open Space
• Dolloff Lake: Urban Residential, Medium (
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
SMP shoreline designations within the city and the Potential Annexation Area are shown on Maps A-C.
They include Natural, Shoreline Residential, and Urban Conservancy.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
Page 10 of 17
CITY OF
Federal Way
Department of Community Development
33325 8"' Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
www.eilyolTedcralwa oo
N/A, this is a non -project action. Portions of the SMP jurisdiction include wetlands and priority habitat
areas, erosion hazard areas, and landslide areas. Other critical areas, as defined by the Federal Way
Revised Code, may also be present.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
N/A, this is a non -project action and no people would reside or work in the completed project.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not displace any people.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and no measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts are necessary.
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and no measures are necessary to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing
and projected land uses.
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and no measures are necessary to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and
forest lands of long-term commercial significance.
9. Housing
N/A, this is a non -project action. None of the questions in this section apply.
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low
income housing.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not result in any housing units being provided.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or
low-income housing.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not eliminate any housing units.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and no measures are required to reduce or control housing impacts.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal
exterior building material(s) proposed?
Page 11 of 17
CITY OF
Federal Way
Department of Community Development
33325 81" Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
w%v %v. e i t yof federa_i_wa
N/A, this is a non -project action and no structures are proposed to be constructed.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not alter or obstruct views.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and no measures are required to reduce or control aesthetic impacts.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not result in any light or glare.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not result in any safety hazard or interfere with views.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not be affected by off -site sources of light or glare.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
This is a non -project action. However, portions of the following parks and open spaces are located in the
shoreline jurisdiction (Exhibit J):
Dash Point State Park
Dumas Bay Sanctuary Park
Poverty Bay Open Space
Dumas Bay Center and Knutzen Family Theatre
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not displace any existing recreational uses.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to
be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and no measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation are necessary.
Page 12 of 17
ZCITY
OF
Federal Way
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
Department of Community Development
33325 81h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www.cityofi ckraI way.ow
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old
listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically
describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action. It is unknown whether there are any buildings, structures, or sites, located
on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local
preservation registers.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This
may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of
cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to
identify such resources.
N/A, this is a non -project proposal. However, historically, Native American families who resided in the
area of the Muckleshoot Reservation on the east side of the Green River Valley traveled west to the shores
of Puget Sound for the plentiful fisheries resources, so there may be evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural
importance within the shoreline jurisdiction area.
Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or
near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology
and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not result in impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near
the project site.
c. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to
resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which does not require any measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss,
changes to, and disturbance to resources.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe
proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
N/A, this is a non -project action.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
N/A, this is a non -project action.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed projector non -project proposal have?
How many would the project or proposal eliminate?
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not add or eliminate any parking spaces.
Page 13 of 17
CITY OF '
Federal Way
Department of Community Development
33325 8`h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
w ww.cityoffedcra I way, co i n
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or
state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether
public or private).
N/A, this is a non -project action, therefore, there would be no need for any new or improved roads, streets,
pedestrian, bicycle, or state transportation facilities.
e. Will the projector proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action. There is no water, rail, or air transportation in the immediate vicinity
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed projector proposal? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be
trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models
were used to make these estimates?
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not generate any additional vehicular trips per day.
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest
products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest
products on roads or streets in the area.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
N/A, this is a non -project action and there is no need for any measures to reduce or control transportation
impacts.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
N/A, this is a non -project action, which would not result in the need for increased public services, such as fire
protection, police protection, public transit, health care, and schools.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
N/A, this is a non -project action and there is no need to reduce or control impacts on public services.
16. Utilities
N/A this is a non -project action. None of the questions in this section apply.
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
N/A, this is a non -project action. Since the shoreline jurisdictional area is mostly developed, all utilities are
Page 14 of 17
CITY or A
Federal Way
Department of Community Development
33325 8`" Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www. CI tyofFedera l way. coin
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
N/A, this is a non -project action and no additional utilities are needed until a project is proposed.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead
agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
N
Name of Signee: Margaret H Clark
Position and Agency/Organization: Principal Planner
Date Submitted: April 1, 2019
Reviewed and concurred with.
e
Signature:
Date reviewed:
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A
Shoreline Environment Designations Along Puget Sound
Exhibit B
Shoreline Environment Designations Along Lakes
Exhibit C
Shoreline Environment Designations
Exhibit D
Shoreline Environment Designations Federal Way and its Potential Designation Area
Exhibit E
Geologic Hazards
Exhibit F-1 & F-2
Flood Plain Maps
Exhibit G
Generalized Existing Land Use
Exhibit H
Zoning Designations
Exhibit I
Comprehensive Plan Designations
Exhibit J
Major Parks and Open Spaces
Page 15 of 17
CITY OF
Federal Way
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions)
Department of Community Development
33325 8`h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www. cityoffederal way. coin
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the
elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the
types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster
rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage,
or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposed changes to the SMP will not increase discharges, emissions, or release of toxic or hazardous
substances, or the production of noise. The changes improve the degree of consistency and coordination
of the current policies and regulations with state SMP policies and rules, as well as local regulations, such
as the adoption of revisions to Federal Way's Environmentally Sensitive Areas and Flood Damage
Prevention. It is expected that these changes will improve the administration of policies and regulations
within the Shoreline, and by doing so, enhance environmental protection from potentially harmful
discharges, emissions, and releases.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
The existing SMP includes restrictions on uses, activities, and development within SMP jurisdiction that
prevent the discharge of water or release of toxic or hazardous substances into the water. The standard
requires no net loss of environmental functions within the shoreline.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed changes will not negatively affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life. By increasing the degree of
consistency of the SMP and improving its usability, it should improve the administration of policies and
regulations within SMP jurisdiction, and by doing so it may improve conditions for plants, animals, and fish.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
The existing SMP establishes a standard of no net loss of environmental functions within the shoreline. This
is intended to preserve and protect existing habitat for existing plants, animals, and fish through the policies
and regulations in the SMP. Provisions of the SMP also encourage the restoration and enhancement of
ecological functions that should positively affect habitat for native plants, animals, and fish.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
This proposal has no effect on energy depletion. Proposed changes will not deplete natural resources. By
increasing the degree of consistency of the SMP and improving its usability, it should improve the
administration of policies and regulations within SMP jurisdiction, and by doing so it may restore natural
resources within the shoreline area.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
The proposed regulations are measures aimed at protecting natural resources along city shorelines as shown in
Exhibits A-D. The proposal will have no effect on energy conservation, but is strongly linked to protecting
remaining intact natural resources along the shoreline not already impacted by development.
Page 16 of 17
CITY OF
Federal Way
Department of Community Development
33325 8`h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609
www.Cit offiederalwa .CDI11
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated
(or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic
rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or
prime farmlands?
Proposed changes will not negatively affect environmentally sensitive or protected areas. By increasing the
degree of consistency of the SMP and improving its usability, it should improve the administration of
policies and regulations within SMP jurisdiction, and by doing so it may improve protections.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
The existing SMP establishes a standard of no net loss of environmental functions within the shoreline.
This is intended to preserve and protect environmentally sensitive and protected areas through the policies
and regulations in the SMP. Provisions of the SMP also encourage the restoration and enhancement of
ecological functions that should positively affect environmentally sensitive and protected areas.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed changes will not negatively affect land and shoreline use or compatibility. By increasing the
degree of consistency of the SMP and improving its usability, it should improve the administration of
policies and regulations within SMP jurisdiction, and by doing so it should improve the compatibility of
land use and shoreline plans.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
The proposal itself aims to improve the compatibility of land use and shoreline plans.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?
The proposed changes to the SMP do not impact demands on transportation, public services, or utilities.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
Not applicable.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements
for the protection of the environment.
The proposal will not conflict with local, state, or federal laws, or requirements for the protection of the
environment. The proposal aims to protect and enhance the environment within SMP jurisdiction. One of
the purposes of the proposal is to ensure consistency between the SMP and changes in local and state
policies.
Page 17 of 17
DMn POUk
UDCOPMk
EXHIBIT
Shoreline Environment Designations in Federal Way and its Potential Annexation Areas
I'11[1, of .Sound
q
eu+ yJ,
! `-�iti� �e
e••
'ram+
� t "+In
-
. r •:��.
f
�
� �.d'nn h.M.Y .�_ �t'r w.�,i- iS
� a t a
-
,
.,, . .;,,a sw
r
'�ti
�'; ��^
7.y 6anccuy Pry �
~ ,"I
a.ir :W..µ
i �hT-�•[•�•�• ,wS ... Y i_ � ; '.� ;wr.r o.n
Sri �
�
.S
wi, { '�i
ay +
'r�.[
Mlel.x '.: •`•••• 6w i�T �iY .r.,n
.�.+ � �_ �.
'ia'.�r`s„ ••
ter � "''"
.M1 '
•,,r 1' -�-� � � �
..=
EX71-3�IT
tut/ -;• .I _._. _'.' _�� iil.— I + •" 7�� � � / i 5272 t!7 s nar inn
far l-.pkMr
ara
Way r�'�,u i� T1.IrNw°Rr h J■�,�]F1RTfr �ArrCi+r.i]
C
U ,, $• �
.Tiy'lTRR, •,Rr
b' l }iTssl
R'.:�'ii•. r. � - %dr G1r
�
_..
� r � �1. $ - [� ys* ' �xFrr' s4*{r• �►� j1`wraue
r .31 S+"n .�. i tm1 P �i�ut{r11 $ ie7Tri F]r,n
l 9.- si /I 1./IR SIY.r1 ■1/tn
a
i i� ♦ +/n /.r ¢� n 8
+.rnlrwlyl1, P
} i ^
Pand�Pam
`�•fcrn 1e �
.,.-•.I.+,., •'q Y•. ... ►. Mir t�l ;;.-�£
�.iY 87 !t t� r R.. '+7M b7 7. IK
a zis;r
., D I � .,." , � : .b it l!!!n �... "s'�.•��- iF.
04
..;r
�.r 2 � • Glrl.lrs tL` brYl + � �r __ '� Ip � N r ti.rft' y+. a1„ k • � i.a ai
- .w Ir. :i.r i psr, t fib. a a� i8=j fk� r 'r�"" }7►Ir I :in It41 : 9
''_ ' a i t ' ucrelwnosl + 3 IL t IiR /rl �{ POIk y r,\. t 9 i 'Boa.Tr r►
T1/1
■MS%r rHfr ' `• �'es i1R/M1 •, T 71 1
f i S ii f3',!r /M Ir! i•ld ri _ia .dal' ~ R= }� 'S- :K ; r�=f,
/y l" r .•..14w� y� 11R'� i . ti";. i [ Lt. •]/r Tt ;.r -4 .�TaY
jj ul/e i arras r cameue �±*'t
sw,• - /10 +T R - r R • f LAtI , •, 1 �
�I •ytA nUnnwdv �� ,r•a �
n •�r, i :,,rrr �: anw +4 .o"m.
fR. .+lrmiitl > I i i IL i �• b ALyr
•t9/m + 1 :1µsr q " N R"" - 2 i, Rr1 rr. _ ei+_r
DOW
.�'^,_-- .■ y err
Owill
�. c - it S i 1 tt
to li�fr �. 1� Pafir rota r
L xif
4 4w,r:. 7ii t:G
077287 /w•t aw.+
w,o ,,. � Sl691 t.9k6 Sfve+
Park KKsakl a•r
Pack
..�.I
1 'ri :i l��trrr yi
Noy Snar "" FnOwmene
Shoreline Environment
Designations:
�;`,� ..•'�t
Natural
�t
Shoreline Residential
Urban Conservancy;
•
•r
I
r, t
t -
and its Potential Annexation Areas
Shoreline Environment Designations in Federal Way
EXHIBIT
fp—
Federal Way Shoreline Environment
Shoreline Master Program Designations =Z—
At
A
xk
fro
Shoreline Environment
Designations:
Natural
Shoreline Residential
Urban Conservancy
0,25 0.5
-
Miles
A Federal Way
EXHIBIT
N
m
cv
o
p
cc
E
p
�
Q)
_
x
p
Q!
ai
ca
a�
a
p
L
cA
LiJ
a
a
v
N
m Y
iv
AVJ►
(I'
tR
co
n
w
M
Y
N
70O
aQ
:
J
Y
pNp
Y
Y
p
ma)O(
Yp
>
LL
/�
N
N
C
C
N
$
L
3m
G v
z
�v
T
n
� �
CU
mr
LO
4:
,,ee
u fi
nn
E m
c°s
cap
m
N a
E N
l� Z t
N
s c ~ 1D
• � - E d
a
V 419Z
n 5•at a4a S - S "V 419Z
-
Ny d
N M_JI
ryyI �G�i` _ M M Ml M ai
S"V 419L
S AmH 310012d
gd°�Od S.
p S "b4�6 i
Qi �y S 4Mti
4
LL M Pa
S "V 1Sl w
Q S"Vlsl S"VIS[
N
OX.
ysa vi y
M �
M Q(
w 3
MS "V 1SLZ N N
_ c¢
i
3H AM 7u,°
y 71O
H
N S "V 4161?
s.
J M oil Rd S44
,t, m
.4a
dp
l
R
O 1 a�`Pe
co o �S
hr y''e
r �
0= d
o;
z
City of
Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
ac;o►na g
R A a p IX-
C Map Dale: February 2015
Y � J } p eCcral Wnv
s � nn
1 81lWr Rva
S
9d°°'
25700Geolo is Hazards nw.mtryoRed0eralwaycom
Kent
R>
-s
rat
s 304111 St
sac:, sr T-,S
tli
�+t
Federal N n
Way
S1N Carp
Legend
M Federal Way City Limits
�r
L ' Potential Annexation Area
Erosion Hazard Area
'life
® Landslide Hazard Areas
Us as
Uf
Federal
Way
P.A.A.
G f
• p� � � N jjj .!
� f
i
CtTY Of
Federal Way�\1
Scale: N
0 0.5 1
JAcomplan,2014 Update\Natural Environmentlgeologichazards_2.mxd Miles
Milton
�d o0
Map Not. Possible hazards based on
ground slope are not indicated on-tktis map- r'1
Natural Environment
Element
This map is intended for use
as a graphical representation.
The City of Federal Way makes
no warranty as to its accuracy.
a •r rr 10•
4T'22'30'(-
1
IJ[l!I
"46pp 14
I
J�
f
M45e N
I
I
sa60mN.N
.1
a�
�I
' 430 14
4N::1
"QY N
'4B°OeaE
Y. rc•.I'101E1
f��-•• __•
'1940"E
'5D—E
'51—E iONE Ale
X'hS PAKt GQ14 uay 122.
18'45'
IY'ti xE
- wE
� { NQ�!•YC 7�.�' S wON sl�
20
k.]ME w•
OMAC frY
KIN(: coiiti T.S
1^"I
Rtil-N'i'[dRl'Oii•LTEDAREAS
-
5100: l
'ZONF�.YE
PCI(,'F7 SGrr.1'1)It}r g
3l� g a�aw
y�1Eaa
4a
r�
28
W AQYna
•L•
'ZD,IEA
p m91Ex
� wan nl
141�C vE a R>N
a
ZQHE AL a�
Z¢SNF UDF = 1
aFfNn1 CITY OF
-•
DES MOINES
ZONE VIP s 530077
1 Y1EQ X
:LONE YE�
I
'
Xp 4E pE
'Lair> ve R � A
-- ZaNex 32
ZOMEIVF`fy r,
ZONEA
11 slF�psa'1
33
Pei t'�'•R T1' ;ON[AQ
_
_
1
L ii ■��p
�P.ELvaIEEp,!
•:• INaAn4,
XONE vE
ZONE
1ilYG ['OL'P'75—
e,i 1i Tat
u1{tiL'QRPOR•LT
EO A REA:
LRree
.wwiLt,w.
Fi
PiTGE75Q!'T,Vp
5300711
ve
x
"N
r t,ry
fM
Lp NLR
xONQ
-m
g
3
9.Tn n
' Z pNI. YE
—
IFIN Mmaar as
ad Pif wr
a
di. �
,..
m¢eQAc�
_ram /n.N
zaNex
s
CITY OF
Nr
IN
FEDERAL WAY
322
'fw�j�
Zn1:C x
-
1
1-1
CITY OF '
FEDERAL WAY
530322
12
ZONE x
MIRROR
E�
EX JB I��
LEGEND
INUNDATION BY THE 1%PNNJK WMKL FLOOD
bWx+4aNVL 4aN aEr..w w.. e.N, n.P.Nr N.,
..nr :it..rt+ae. .rr �. Ir u.arl.w w,v.ar
b^aeandn+ xar�.ub4dw �a e.ww AMw.r•I O.wnn.w rarwwn.
�A ue Flm4 Damem, aamm:ve
ZONEAM R4444 dtm]NetlmvW armorvm4mlY. Mn rlooa eermem
2axEPo Nme 4ean,dtm]Na lrmanvmaa Mrmmpglennl: a.m9e
4.pw 4bmmn4 Ea arm b afr.rb Nn noo4:N, vdaivaan4bmmwm
eaN¢PR I,+.n�nWn�rtx amud�m
mien slam n emq r,vnM m Pmea
zoxEA,9 ,va.weeweNd�nm twamm�mawe mm er.Feo.el nose
Peamm.nlm mw mmNaam; m sx Nw4 Dmu,eNa..xma
¢oxev exm.d4ary nmre lwavaanwp; roNU Nom emeeem
aalmdrce zan
c zm4xm.amq nmm(w.4aalml: awEw4aE—
FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AR
I...,K+wr'�"�w.�ww�wunma�lxmt•mnv_..r,xw meaxtmtnno
MmndONL nr.n ara mee..a-w.•me¢aan mmmxx
OOTHER FLOOD AREAS
i¢NeX me102u amub Wrce roo[nb�in woiun�ml.,IMntsew�e
avm9�4bl�m peuma OY sea nwn 1%emutlmmn nwtl.
OTHER AREAS
' mN n4a4PM'n
wa, n+1dhw.a.,wua mN 42"ar�rX n. "� _
® COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBNS) AREAS
OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAS)
artasan an romdF re.a RNPem aarmtte EpeblEwae Nam4Yueas
4.xx Amub owmEwoeµ+m maan
Roo4 �mm1'
.^..... yea •emneary
iNfAYPIrM �a.bvw�/Mwr Er Flwe ENvaew
IEL 9ITI 8- EN.eeon.wa Mw4 worm x4en wnr, elamuanm
mmmmwxam Ne rekan•v utb wrmdwm
A A Dm, xNm Rra
Ovrr Er � IPe�i lr m�vll�w-am Nm�ilWnm memwamownomma
19`^I. ane-.n,i w..rN .a+•..w�.ra �r+.rarw,e
ouf,E % emm mm In �laxem nnamminers ueooa Nis pw4
eu• wm aae
FL CTN E'lATF=roE Me➢
DE
EFEEC 9P,EIS� eE 99wN191TUTNLS—GL
�n4 ioa� a wmm
NNwam.wee 9r< �eaa4enalwrs awp gmmpomN pnmuW ,w.alwan
eem.,P�a�4meN� 4.m., ra..mN.�emmw,
M.v newRi.YN"�Piwr N`"'amw. Ewmim.rcrN roYmwr°m ""'�...�,r 4a,..
,,.. m. x..m.1 Elm4 wwram. ¢marmr N Iaronloaezo.
MAP SC4E I 10Y0'
PANEL 123OG
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
AND INCORPORATED AREAS
PANEL 1230 OF 1700
(SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOIR)
s4w1eIB&
sYMd•"YBLYs mm6EB E� wEEIX
PRELIMINARY
FEBRUARY 1, 2013
rFaw.rur. T+. 91y NuNi1T >tawT oFie.
�aeeM a .I4C wNfn Pllenl ,IR..rdI1F; M
G TINNd IM.W elwn leV,� 1mFYL! !E
Mla .. ITN,arnea �e11Ip,4 IN Nw 41�.f
cam.. MAP NUMBER
MAP REVISED
ZONE AE tea'
It
coaFALH EEL 1E)
Lo
'38mmmE
{EL 14{
SW =aTA'A Lrs s39m°"E '40'E
ZONE VE
'91—E EEL 15{ '42—E s43ma.E
"MINSr
sar '96—E s46°0 E
122'22'30"
122' 30' 00' sw 2s4m M
4OIN5
PINEL CM
r P 22 30'
47. 22'30"
28
ZONE AE•
AD
_
arf xOaA[I'+'x W fE l • M.,
[bpA TM
7i
U E
n1Lsp1nlr LH
aw 20NE VE '2VE-+
'EEL'1�5,
+
1gNE
bn ;w IF, .x Si
w
ZONEAE
.. t
.
25
.
SJ '-�
a lEL 15]
ONE RE
1
ZONE UE
s>9800°"N
.�
BE4Cxx ZQNERE V} YAA� 1
EEL 14]
` +
!tL r5x
w.r I@r 131. -ZONEA
29
..
_..
Whim iL
.� YI'141nr f<
4
'lE�l+•
¢ 'RidiR80H
ZONE % --ZONE VE
KFiY r hQ�.mi
30
sa, fEl 151
1: NI N CO lRVO R.1T: U �ckF>k
V
',1. xx�rETw ZONE nE
-
�(El 51
•I wlem w
—LONE YE:
IE� x8
u45_'"N
+
+
`c
a,'+7r1mar -t- �2oHE X
• .
-
sr
ZONE RE
32
LEL 141
_ZO N E.VE {EI .7fi{
36
AVT 1a1St
EEi1-1
- —zoN .51 31
3
fE1 .re7,
� ZONEAE
ZONE
� rrolal cn
}4r
�-=ZONE'•. 1aa
s ,� 7,ONE 5AE
�
r'l rCJf 1.SAl1A'il.
"i•
1EL+1� TS 5
1L5Tx 51 � EC x5]
--zar+E•vE -
i
lEl t5;
T 2? N.
Y 21 N
ZONE V€�+ 9
S T 21 N f 20NE VE 'ry,9'E rylpP.+»i1=h 5HF]sY,y fJn Tryl$PM1kFLiS 1;0(j ATF,•J 1Y11HiN [Q/xnS11%P �`
a
5, l5'• ' rypflTn
[lM1.{74[ : E�57 AfYi1 l?1LVi45H�r:$1 nCRT N. RANIZ 3 EAsT AND 1OWNStUP
,. T
NO Ris1,
Pa.NGE C'PR5'TANa YJlYN511i>' 2tn1)kT.. R.1.�r6: 3 EAM
12vm
IEc
.•
... ..
T
rl'El; cl) P.15,9, I (;E' ZONE VE
Zo E'VE
rEL 19
iC., r.l +
sn nr Her
d
"--t:OKE VE:
12—ES
!%
10.i 15,
ZONE A'
r+ u.l,res.r
-
zonE vE
ZONE nE
:
tEL 16)
xw 2w+x cT
rrlrl; nrnn
E -151
`
ZONE VE
��
ar
a>f1n
• \
UE-ti
TES15,
(EL 20)
sx42-11
•-
--ZONE VE
!
•\
yI(fl'EIdNE
' •• �
ZONE RE
W W,.,. {.
`y 20HE of
EL 4y{
i
',
PONE RE 14yE:$F.
PONE VE
•�L iEc W." 4
iE136.
IOliE VE
af.
j
/�
/
PONE UE f 20N i
f1"W-=n�
Ol
t111Ni'UIi Ni)IL71'E D ART,, tC
i
"�, .[LL IOr (F.1 x31
-31
i!• c;_
w
"i m ;
_
14ix CT 9W
sr
s3nazl
%
fib, �
1
„
9ry a4am
ZONE vE
L
_
5•f alom cr
12
sx91umnN
..
... 1. ••• � -
• I
afar
+n
aa111 x'Vl Sr1'
�•
N ar,in A.
4W 1,4Sn
ar
r-
au.xacmTnw.n.`�—.� 70
••~
HP,4f;CVExr• '•'�
--
S'rdtnxOa.l1V1+
yyrxlryTx'%T
11
PIERCELOIJNfY•
4aT1'xvfLl'x
`1�1 Sw ]xAm rL
CITY OF FEDERAL WA
Z
p
'•�
ZONE %
530322
5x90ow.N
-
-
- - -
- 15
P3
13
1239—N
ti 23
q
'38—N
•
- .t
_ -
w
'37—N
-
- +
'9900PoN
l
E H I JD
-
m30m'N
t
+
+ -
-
-
47' 15' 00'
47' W 00'
122' 22' 30"
M T
C
2 O
C
'' EXHIBIT� 6V
fR � '�
\\JAI ,/IA, y v7 4 v N
5 /[� •x � a
_ \{% W m a m
m .
c m
L •cl) Y ��
W Vi/ w o °
W N T � N N C d E
U d3T _ N N •m � W
/1CIOO Q O {Up C p E
Oyri N N O) U7 10 p N J d N Y] �yaL
LL t� a "' l0 "O N 7 O E LL
O O O O 0 f0 47 : N (0 Q 0 N O
+� a U o` 5 O O a in >> `; in o gg//+II v 5
OI • m M , i V
U U C� �Z T Z F-
........... .....•rv._..... ?i -
i
�. � it r } _ �� ' . - • .. - ��. •.;� ? _ -
-tiii ,* y
It
i 1€F. f!t li it 'pI III 1!� _ {{ ••`5..eo�.. ��•`•
:�x•,a i �k h irE FI i��Ef ., F_, ! _ ! ' �, Ali � 1F �i I - -
.N' It
r�� irlr.t. €f ...iil €�f `rlil• .. F+I E! �i -
III i
fir ly �; it }i p r Ir = .• '
A� +ill All
r fr
iil � . •• k h,r� �; �, .
..:t r ■
f .
•
Ir�
Irk" !€F
11!
i
:il'�i
LL
LL
�
A■
O
/V��
�
L m
n� o U
c
C j
�a
u
W
���oN>>>>>
u v
� N
a)
N V
v
N
oY7
O
(V
A`
as a as
as
a
O O
N
in m
in m w
o
o
O O
O O a
C
OE w
x x N
o N
N
a
,17
L
m r
N
a~
�E�
01c
■�
N
C
li
LL LL
N
,
Q
N
L O
N
Wo
o
.N
o o
>
W
x
LZ
W
N
c m
O
Li
r
CY)
CO
C C
OI
o
EayE
YcQ>
moN•
-�m
NE
.4
Q0N
�oO
LL
mCn
�O �N
�c
vO �c
�c
U
000er
N
,rLLa-
�0
ci
I., QEf
EmdU)
HEU
�z
LL
�NO
...........
...............r
..�..................... _...........................
.r.
Gi
S AV 4i8i -I
S "V +Jlez
a� P pg'M111W
f "ISO
...?s-V IS
• •s S Av lit S �AV;S} �.........
PW
..
1 �
°
S U) `o s
.s
M
• � � 13 CFJ � rrr� • O`
{ MS ^VISIZ 00
,r
.Se
f rc
s= 9N AM;(,
f
Rd S'14 u u N
N�
#f
a s c vvi rn uYi s 2 E ci E E ao v m uvi o
SQ .'err• `_v .o o v o Q c c < Q c c c
o Q o c c c c c c c c c
a m a"i o 'v o 'o -2 '2 a a -2
' •U a Lr (r 0 0 0 U U 0 0 0 0 0
0 a a 0 0 0000000006
rn
a
T
C � `=v >y � oT
/U N> 6? u C Va.
W
/7� a.1/1U) rllr �Q NUY d
E
a)/ — V U U t0 --
U
UW O R .gyp,.
R L
V!
/11 O c
W A\ c
r y c❑ c nEv ac
W rn IDo
■� ^` E N W N
_W J O N N d N E a N L E N
w' W ❑ c o u_ 3 m m_ > o a E
LL /� W 'J X C O C GI Y U �C J S pl W L V T
O Q i■i 1� ¢>
2 2 aE� -or_
lp OI 0pLLN d ) Lpp NN0 N oO NN=N N Lo � oc LLv
E E E m m `w
Ol
E E E O O.N 0` O
O O 0 w oO W\\ UU z o a a n n rn o v m
EN ci �. . as
�z zp
••......�,......�
......�w, ...................... ¢ yy
%......................... A..ff.w.•.Mff..f�■fu.., :cc ..N
v ..
ov
N '
N
S AV ViBi
0
IR �*
�S N:
3N
� oe oM
y � N
C M C
Q� pN] pNl
N a) N (�1 •F 01 O O V V1
iii Y c of c v E a E v
E
=p o OU NOO ou m m m o 0 o 0
�. #UC CUC
p
o v v 'E a v
2LC U O O U U O O O O O
EXHI w I II@i
City of Map V 14 117�l�t! A City
Date: February 2015
� Crty of Federal Way
OISFederal Way _ 333 58thA
33325 Bth Ave S
Ma or Parks and Open Spaces Federal Way, WA 98003
Comprehensive Plan 25 000
vrww. Aty.cityolfed eralway, com
I
Des Kent
Mot
Pugel Sound
mar
s zs�st+� ss
Camelot
Park
Federal
Federal
Poverty Way
Bay Open sty
yYySar�ajawea
i
Space �R
e
Park
S 304th st
1
sw 312 h sE
ota -
+
rk
aint
gyy ❑ ri St
1201n St
CA
d
w
o
L
flymplc
N
Cele'
Park
❑rt
View
I Panther
�t
P
Park
Lake Open
SW arh Space
Sagh irk
11
r .w1��-,, tacoma I
Legend
City Limits
p Federal Way Potential Annexation Area
City, State and County Parks
Open Space
CFederal
ITYY OF
,'� a ra l Way
Scale:
0 0.5 1
JAcomplan12014 Update\Capital Facilitieslparkos_2.mxd Miles
Ir
�Federal
To n St
tt S. are Park Way
P. A. A.
5 320t1� 5
N a s—
s 3xsth St
336t1: ��
!
ark G neva 1
Park
AO
"ru "y
Federal !
Way uth
County
P.A.A. Ballfills !
cx
S,
q �,
ve Mile
Lake Park
r�
Miffon
-Edaewoo
Capital Facilities Element
This map is intended for use
as a graphical representation.
The City of Federal Way makes
no warranty as to its accuracy.
