The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUTC PKT 11-07-2005 City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee November 7'" 2005 City Hall 5 :30 p.m. Council Chambers MEETING AGENDA l. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 3"', 2005 3. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes) 4. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Shoreline Master Program grant acceptance Action Conlen / 5 min B. Undergrounding Utilities on WSDOT Pacific Hwy South Project Action Roe / 5 min C. Amon Access on SR 509 Action Perez / 15 min D. Fencing of pond at 21st Avenue SW and SW 349th Place Action Bucich / 10 min E. WRIA 9 Resolution to Adopt Habitat Plan Action Bucich / 10 min F. Inter-Local Agreement for Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Action Bucich / 10 min G. Triangle Project SRl61 / SRI8 / 1-5 - Status Report Information Perez / 15 min H. Federal Way Public Schools 2006 Capital Facilities Plan/School Information Kraus /10 min Impact Fee 5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS 6. ADJOURN Committee Members City Staff Jack Dovey, Chair Kathy McClung, Community Development Services Director Eric Fn/son Afarianne Stiles. Administrative Assistant Michael Park 253-835-2701 G:\LUTCI..1.JTC Agendas and Surrrnaries 2005\ 11-07-05 LUTe Agenda doc City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee October 3rd, 2005 City Hall 5:30 pm Council Chambers MEETING MINUTES In attendance: Council Member Jack Dovey, Council Member Michael Park, Council Member Eric Faison, Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar; City Manager David Moseley; Deputy City Attorney Karen Kirkpatrick; Public Works Director Cary Roe; Public Works Deputy Director Ken Miller; Services Manager Will Appleton; Street Systems Manager Marwan Salloum; Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Senior Planner Jim Harris, Community Development Consultant Janet Shull, City Staff Attorney Jenni Snell, and Administrative Assistant Marianne Stiles. A number of citizens also attended. 1. CALL TO ORDER Councilman Dovey called the meeting to order at 5:32 pm. 2. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES The minutes of September 19th, 2005, were approved. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT 4. BUSINESS ITEMS A. 2005 Asphalt Overlay Project - Acceptance & Retainage Release Marwan Salloum provided the background information. Cmte PASSED staff recommendation to fwd approval to the October 18th Council Consent Agenda. MOVEI?by Councilman Faison. SECONDED byCouncilman Park. PASSED Unanimousl)!. B. SR161 @ SR18 Intersection Improvements - 85% Design Status Rpt Marwan Salloum provided the background information. Cmte PASSED staff recommendation to fwd approval to the October 18th Council Consent Agenda. iifQEE.!LfY:9~~~~ii!!!~~fq!(:~g(;J?ii//KPj~__9i~~:c}!~_q~~~q~s~~~-:?1-~$~ijT!~i~~~~~~ZYJ C. 2006 Street Sweeping Services - Authorization to Bid Marwan Salloum provided the background information. Cmte PASSED staff recommendation to fwd approval to the October 18th Council Consent Agenda. 'MQEE.P)~:_9~~~~il~q:~~E~~iqi:_fl4:i;Jjj}/iE.p)i:i:;~~~~jii!q_~~~qiI'?1-~S~ij-f!~-~~~~~~~/YJ D. Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat - Revisions Jim Harris provided background information. G:\LUTC\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2005\10-03-05 LUTe Minutes.doc Land Use/Transportation Corrunittcc Page 2 August] , 2005 Citizen Comment: Robert LaBounty (lives east of & above the plat) commented that the trees that need to be pulled down are because of the developer's own actions. The largest clearing incursion is between his property and the development. He said the developer had promised the homeowners that they could have input on the replacement vegetation but he has not been given any chance to provide input yet. He wants coniferous trees - that won't lose their leaves in winter and expose his view to the new development. He also asked what was being done about after hour's work- there have been refueling trucks active on the site at two 0 'clock in the morning. He asks how the Council intends to resolve this because as public officials they are responsible. Chris Austin, Trinity Land Development, Puyallup, WA. Mr. Austin addressed Mr. LaBounty's concerns; he thought they had already resolved the after-hours work concerns and will make sure it is resolved. They (Trinity) have met with all the neighbors and discussed the over-clearing. They have offered to introduce additional plantings and to increase the buffer zone. Mr. Austin maintains that Trinity has done everything in their power to resolve the issues. They have approved city staff's suggestion on graffiti proofing the retaining wall and would like clarification on the term 'watch' regarding the troublesome trees. Mr. Harris stated that the 'watch' on the troublesome trees could be concluded by the time the Final Plat Approval is sought. Chairman Dovey stated that, although stafffeels that this developer may have successfully mitigated their over- clearing issue, the City needs a policy on over-clearing, especially as the land left to be developed is likely to be more sensitive. What penalties should be put in place in response to over-clearing? fijli~F.p}X:9~~~~ii~~~:f~!~q~~-:~::~::~~--g9J2&:i?~QfY9q~~~jZ~~~f~;k-~..~..~.t4~~f~ji:Q~~:~~~~~~i~ E. Neighborhood Business Zone - Self Service Storage Facilities Janet Shull presented background information. Citizen Comment: Brian Lawler, of the Irmas Charitable Foundation, (sp), supports the amendment. Councilman Faison said he was concerned that sefFstorage units are already allowed in BP & BC zones & do not fit in 'residential' areas. He mentioned an increase in height in the BN zone and suggested setting back the discussion. He repeated that perhaps the BN zone should be reviewed as part of next year's agenda. He suggested Brian Lawler try to re-zone his client's property. Chairman Dovey asked if this item was approved by the planning commission unanimously. Ms. Shull said that it had. Chairman Dovey & Councilman Park said they were comfortable movingforward with the planning commission's decision. ~Q~t;Q}lJ;~~b:0!;;q~=!S!'i(.: ~.: =: =:~'4~ijj/jii)jpi_C;~E.&:!!!i~~iio.~~y:=:=:=: "j1.~~~Q}'~(f..q!~q~=~~s.~~;;i!~g.] 6. FUTURE MEETINGS Chairman Dovey requested that the topic of developer over-clearing & prospective penalties be added to a future agenda. The City needs a policy on over-clearing, especially for sensitive land. What penalties should be put in place in response to over-clearing? The next scheduled meeting will be October 1 ih, 2005. 7. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 6:38 p.m. G,\I.UT(~LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2005\10-03.05 LUTe Minutcs.doe CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: October 30, 2005 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: David MO~y Manager FROM: Kathy McClung, CDS Director ~ 0- Isaac Conlen, Associate Plannery SUBJECT: Shoreline Grant Acceptance/Consulting Contract Policy Question Should City Council pass a resolution accepting the grant award from Washington State Department of Ecology in the amount of$153,000.00 for update of the city's Shoreline Master Program (SMP) and authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement for consulting services with a qualified consulting firm to assist the city in updating the SMP? Background State law requires local jurisdictions to update their SMPs by December 1, 2009. Washington State Department of Ecology has offered substantial grant opportunities for those jurisdictions, which agree to complete the update early, prior to July 1, 2007. The city applied for an 'early update' grant in the amount of$153,000 and received approval for the entire grant request. Ifwe accept the grant award, we agree to complete the update by June 30, 2007. A comprehensive update to the city's SMP is needed in three areas: 1) to inventory shorelines under the city's SMP jurisdiction, including newly annexed areas; 2) to inventory shorelines in the city's P AA; and, 3) to update the city's Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulations t6 meet current SMP guidelines. We anticipate the need for qualified consulting services to complete the update. Consulting services will be utilized for the technical shoreline inventory, analysis of shoreline conditions and functions and development of updated goals, policies and regulations. In addition to the $153,000 grant award, the city has budgeted $36,450 in matching funds for a total project budget of$ 1 89,450. Doc. J.D. Ootions Options Positives Nel!atives 1. "I move that City Council pass a a. The city capitalizes on The shoreline update must be resolution accepting the DOE grant grant funds in the completed by June, 2007 rather in the amount of$153,000 and amount of$153,000 than December 2009, thereby authorizing the City Manager to that may not otherwise reducing the city's flexibility with enter into an agreement with a be available if we do regard to timing. qualified consulting firm to assist not accept them now. the city in updating the SMP." b. The city completes the update to the SMP early, by June 2007, bringing those recently annexed areas under the city's SMP as opposed to the County's and provides predictability to shoreline property owners and city residents. 2. "I move that City Council not The city would not be required a. The city would be unable pass a resolution accepting the DOE to complete the update until to capitalize on grant grant in the amount of$153,000 and December 1 2009, which would funds in the amount of authorizing the City Manager to provide flexibility to schedule $153,000. Grant funds enter into an agreement with a the update in accordance with may not be available at a qualified consulting firm to assist local priorities. later date. the city in updating the SMP." b. The project may be delayed in which case recently annexed areas would not come under city SMP jurisdiction until sometime further in the future. Shoreline property owners would lack certainty regarding potential changes to land use regulations. Staff recommendation Option 1: "I move that City Council pass a resolution accepting the DOE grant in the amount of $153,000.00 and authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with a qualified consulting firm, for an amount not to exceed $153,000.00, to assist the city in updating the SMP." Doc. 1.0. Committee recommendation Forward option _ to the full City Council for approval. Exhibits: (A) Draft Resolution (B) DOE Grant Award (C) Scope of Work (D) Budget Doc.I.D. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING A SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM GRANT FROM THE WASHINGTON ST A TE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY IN THE AMOUNT OF $153,000 AND GIVING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTRACT WITH A QUALIFIED CONSULTANT TO ASSIST THE CITY IN UPDATING THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. WHEREAS, at the time of incorporation in 1990, the city adopted the King County Shoreline Master Programs (SMP) and in 1998 adopted its own SMP as a component of the comprehensive plan and in 1999 adopted associated development regulations; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with land use map (the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land use map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998, September 14,2000, November 1, 2001, March 27,2003, July 20,2004 and June 16,2005; and WHEREAS, RCW 90.58.080 requires cities in King County to update their SMP by December 1, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) has offered grant awards to jurisdictions that voluntarily agree to update their shoreline master programs by June 30, 2007; and WHEREAS, the city applied for an early adoption grant from DOE in the amount of $153,000.00; and WHEREAS, the city received a grant award from DOE in the amount of$153,000.00; and EXHIBIT A Res. #~ Page I PAGE I OF L( WHEREAS, by accepting the grant award, the city agrees to complete the update to the SMP by June 30, 2007; and WHEREAS, staff has determined that due to the technical nature ofthe project, the services of a qualified consultant are necessary to complete the update; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, has determined that it is in the best interest and general welfare of the City of Federal Way; and the city's Potential Annexation Area to update the city's SMP; and Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public Interest. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Federal Way and the city's PAA would be served by accepting the SMP update grant in the amount of $153,000.00 and completing an update of the SMP by June 30, 2007. Additionally, the best interests and general welfare of the city and the city's PAA would be served by contracting with a qualified consultant, for an amount not to exceed the total grant amount of $153,000.00, to assist the city in updating the SMP. Section 2. Acceptance of Grant. The City Council hereby accepts the SMP update grant in the amount of $153,000.00. Said grant money is to be used to hire a consultant and pay other costs associated with completing an update to the city's SMP by June 30, 2007. Section 3. Authorization to Hire Consultant. The City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement with a qualified consulting firm to assist the city in updating the SMP by June 30, 2007. Section 4. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such EXHIBIT A Res. # ~ Page 2 PAGE 2- OF 4 invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase ofthis resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority, and prior to the effective date, of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. EXHIBiT A PAGE 3> OF -L. Res. # _ Page 3 RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this day of 2005. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Mayor, Dean McColgan ATTEST: City Clerk, Laura Hathaway, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION No: EXHIBIT A PAGE y OF -L. Res. #_ Page 4 EXHIBIT ~ PAGE \ OF 22 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the State of Washington Department of Ecology and the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Project: Shoreline Master Program Update THIS is a binding agreement entered into by and between the State of Washington, Department of Ecology, (PO Box 47600, Olympia, Washington, 98504-7600) hereinafter referred to as the "DEPARTMENT" and the City of Federal Way, hereinafter referred to as the "RECIPIENT" to carry out the activities described herein. Recipient Name: City of Federal Way Community Development Services PO Box 9718; 33325 Eighth Avenue S. Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Project Coordinator: Isaac Conlen Telephone Number: 253-835-2643/ FAX: 253-835-2609 e-mail: Isaac.conlen@cityoffederalway.com Contact for Recipient Billingllnvoicing: (Mr.) Drew Amdah, 253-835-2523 Payee on Warrants: City of Federal Way (address as above) Project Officer for Ecology: Sandra Lange SEA Program - NWRO Washington State Department of Ecology 3190 - 160th Avenue SE, Bellevue, 98008-5452 Phone Number: 425-649-4260/ FAX: 425-649-7098 e-mail: slan461 @ecv.wa.Qov The DEPARTMENT's source of funds is provisoed by Budget Bill ESSB 6090 to implement shoreline management. Very Important Note: Due to state law, all state funds that are disbursed to local governments under these grants are appropriated in the state budget on an annual basis within the 2-year project. Funds appropriated for the first year of the grant will need to be spent on eligible activities by the end of the fiscal year (June 30, 2006). Local governments are not allowed to carry unexpended funds past that date. We are aware that state and local fiscal years are not on the same schedule; however, state law requires strict adherence to the state fiscal year for state contracts. Maximum Eligible Grant Share, Year 1: $ 71,050 Maximum Eligible Grant Share, Year 2: $ 81.950 Total Eligible Project Cost: $153,000 THE EFFECTIVE DATE of this grant is July 1, 2005 and EXPIRES on June 30, 2007. Page 1 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the f, Washington State Department of Ecology and the EXHIBIT City of Federal Way PAGE 2-. OF 2-'L-- I Scope of Work I Project Title: Shoreline Master Program Update Description: The City of Federal Way ("City") is located in King County ("County") with a population of 85,800. The City's approximately 13.74 miles of shoreline environment includes both salt-water marine shoreline of Puget Sound as well as various fresh water lakes. At the time of incorporation in 1990, the City adopted the County's Shoreline Master Program ("SMP"). In 1998, the City developed and adopted its own SMP that integrated the SMP into the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. In 1999, the City adopted associated development regulations. Subsequent to the December 2003 adoption of the Shoreline Master Program Guidelines ("Guidelines") by the Department of Ecology ("DOE"), an inventory of Federal Way's marine shoreline was conducted in January of 2004 as part of a report prepared for Seattle Public Utilities and WRIA 9. This is the most recent study of the City's shorelines; however, it only included the shorelines of Puget Sound. At that time, other shorelines within the City limits included Steel Lake, the northwestern shore of Lake Killarney, and the western shore of North Lake. As of January 1, 2005, newly annexed areas include the eastern shore of North Lake. The eastern shores of North Lake and Lake Killarney are presently governed by County regulations, as are all the lakes in the City's potential annexation area ("PM"). Additional lakes located within the City's PM coming under purview of shoreline regulations are Star Lake, Lake Dolloff, Lake Geneva, the remaining portion of Lake Killarney and Five Mile Lake. A comprehensive update to the City's SMP is needed in three areas: 1) to inventory shorelines under the City's SMP jurisdiction, including newly annexed areas; 2) to inventory shorelines in the City's PM; and, 3) to update the City's Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulations to meet current SMP regulations. The City will update the SMP to be consistent with the new Guidelines and the requirements of the Shoreline Management Act ("SMA"). The SMP development process will include an inventory and analysis of shoreline ecological conditions and land use within Federal Way City limits, the Potential Annexation Area (PM) and adjacent basins with influence; review and update of goals, policies, environmental designations, and shoreline regulations based on an updated shoreline inventory, community input, and consistency with the requirements of the SMA; and a formal local adoption process. The City will incorporate public participation and coordination with Ecology and adjacent jurisdictions through all phases of SMP development. Page 2 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the EXHIBIT l? Washington State Department of Ecology and the City of Federal Way PAGE OF 22- 3 The SMP will be coordinated and integrated with the City's comprehensive plan and associated development regulations and shall be prepared in conformance with the SMA and the Guidelines, and Chapter 173-26 of the Washington Administrative Code ("WAC"). Qualified consultant support shall be used as appropriate. Work Program: The Recipient shall perform the following tasks. Task 1: Performance Coordination The City will coordinate its efforts in several ways throughout the SMP process. Examples include but are not limited to: . Attendance at Ecology sponsored grantee coordination meetings; . Outreach to adjacent jurisdictions to address transitions of shoreline areas and overlapping shoreline areas; . Contact other agencies, such as the County, for inventory and restoration plan data and information sharing. The City will work with the County to determine the information's availability and whether the timing and availability of the county's information is consistent with the City's schedule. This coordination may result in similar inventory and analysis approaches, development of compatible shoreline policies and regulations and coordinated public outreach and involvement. Deliverables: Quarterly Progress Reports including documentation of contacts and quarterly payment requests. Due Date: 2005: October 20,2005; 2006: January 20, April 20, July 20, October 20, 2006; 2007: January 20, April 20, and final report due July 20,2007. Task 2: Secure Consultant Services The Recipient shall prepare a scope of work for consultant services consistent with the grant scope of work and local procedures, and enter into a contract with the selected consultant. Deliverable: Final executed consulting contract. Due Date: January 31, 2006 Task 3: Public Participation Process Inform and involve the public in updating the SMP during the update effort consistent with the SMA (see RCW 90.58.130) and the Parts I and II of WAC 173-26. Prepare a public participation plan that identifies specific objectives, key parties and establishes time lines for public participation activities. Key element of the public participation plan will include: Page 3 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the EXHIBIT B Washington State Department of Ecology and the City of Federal Way PAGE L1 OF 22- . The city will coordinate with Ecology; communicate with state agencies, local agencies, and affected Indian tribes; and conduct a public involvement process consistent with the Guidelines when developing the SMP. . An interagency working group consisting of a DOE representative, representative of affected Indian tribes, and other affected agencies will be formed to review the work products. . A citizen task force consisting of local citizens and stakeholders will be formed to review the work products. . The city will prepare a public participation plan, which notifies all residents of the work program and a "Parties of Record" mailing list will be kept on file. Interested members of the public will be kept apprised of major steps in the process and be provided with draft documents at the SEPA, Planning Commission, City Council Subcommittee (Land Use/ Transportation Committee), and City Council stages via the city's web site. . A website will be developed for the project to provide a forum for the public to obtain information regarding the SMP update and to provide comments and input related to the project. Information on the website will include draft work products, a timeline for the update, and key contacts. Deliverable: Public participation plan a consistent with RCW 90.58.130 and WAC 173-26- 090 and 100. Documentation of contacts through quarterly progress reports. Date Due: March 15, 2006 Task 4: Inventory and Map Shoreline Conditions Conduct an inventory of shorelines within the limits of the city, the city's PM and adjacent basins with influence on shoreline conditions within the City's SMA jurisdiction. The shoreline inventory shall be prepared consistent with the Guidelines, WAC 173-26-201. Compile pertinent and reasonably available data, plans, studies, inventories, and other applicable information and evaluate existing reports, information, aerial photos and GIS data. Working inventory maps at the appropriate scale for analysis (Le. coarser resolution maps for adjacent lands and finer resolution for the shoreline jurisdiction characterization) will be created. Collect the following information to the extent that such information is relevant and reasonably obtainable: . Shoreline and adjacent land use patterns and transportation and utility facilities. including the extent of existing structures, impervious surfaces, vegetation and shoreline modifications in shoreline jurisdiction. . General location of any channel migration zones, floodplains and the floodway. . Critical areas, including wetlands. aquifer recharge areas, fish and wildlife conservation areas, geologically hazardous areas, frequently flooded areas as defined in RCW 36. lOA. the Growth Management Act. . Degraded areas and sites with potential for ecological restoration. Page 4 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the EXHIBIT ~ Washington State Department of Ecology and the City of Federal Way PAGE :; OF 22- . Areas of special interest, such as priority habitats, rapidly developing waterfronts, previously identified toxic or hazardous material clean-up sites, or eroding shorelines. . Existing and potential shoreline public access sites, including public rights- of-way and utility corridors. The inventory will include, as available, descriptions of recorded public access easements, their prescribed use, maintenance and terms. . Historical aerial photographs documenting past conditions to assist in preparing an analysis of cumulative impacts of development. . Known archaeological, cultural and historic resources in shoreline jurisdiction. . Policies and regulations in shore land and adjacent areas that affect shorelines, such as surface water management and land use regulations (critical areas ordinance; flood ordinance). Deliverables: List of inventory data sources and digital working maps of inventory information displayed at appropriate scale. Due Date: June 21, 2006. Task 5: Analyze Shoreline Conditions Prepare a report and map portfolio analyzing shoreline issues of concern, consistent with the Guidelines (chapter 173-26-201 (3)(d)) WAC). This analysis will also consider cumulative impacts and identify measures to insure internal consistency between the provisions of the city's Comprehensive Plan, critical areas ordinance, and SMP as follows: 5.1: Prepare a coarse analysis (characterization) of shoreline ecosystem processes influencing the area subject to shoreline jurisdiction including: . Description of ecological processes in the drainage basin linked to the shoreline through hydrologic flows. . Presentation of basic geographic context (geology, soils, vegetation and drainage patterns) and a description of how it is relevant to the shoreline. . Delineation of boundaries and mapping of the land and water area contained within the SMA jurisdiction-identifying the preliminary extent of SMA shorelines within the city's jurisdiction, addressing both the required minimum SMA jurisdiction areas and any optional (floodplain and critical area buffer) SMA jurisdiction areas for consideration and decision-making later in the SMA process. . Note location of major land uses, if any (e.g. sewage treatment plants). . Note location and nature of known pertinent regulatory activities (e.g. ESA listings; contaminated sites). . Identification of opportunities for protection/restoration of upland and adjacent areas essential for maintaining shoreline form and function. Page 5 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the Washington State Department of Ecology and the EXHIBIT JS City of Federal Way PAGE (." OF 2-Z- 5.2: Characterize shoreline functions. Separating the shoreline into reaches based on land use and ecological processes, this more detailed characterization analysis will: . Describe the physical, biological and land use components associated with each shoreline reach within shoreline jurisdiction; . Evaluate and assess shoreline ecological functions based on current scientific understanding of the relationship between the conditions of ecosystem-wide processes and conditions within shoreline jurisdiction; 5.3: Identify opportunities for protection, restoration, public access and shoreline use including: . Potential opportunities and possible impediments to the protection and restoration of ecological functions. . Current public access and opportunities for future access sites. . Opportunities for appropriate shoreline uses. This report will provide a foundation for establishing environment designations. The report should identify data gaps, focusing on information that would be useful to support SMP development and implementation. Maps at appropriate viewing scales will be prepared to illustrate findings. Potential areas for shoreline use, public access, restoration and/or protection will be indicated. The portfolio will list and map public access to shorelines. Deliverables: Report and map portfolio addressing the three items identified above. .) Date: August 1, 2006 Task 6: Prepare Draft Shoreline Master Program and Shoreline Development RegUlations Prepare a draft SMP as a shoreline element of the City's GMA compliant comprehensive plan. The SMP will include goals, policies and environmental designations that are consistent with WAC 173-26-171 and 181. Goals and policies will be coordinated to ensure consistency between the comprehensive plan and the SMP. A map will be prepared which shows boundaries of environmental designations relative to comprehensive plan designations. Federal Way City Code Chapter 18, Article III, "Shoreline Management" (shoreline development regulations) shall be amended to include, at a minimum, specific policies and regulations for all shoreline uses and activities in each environment designation. Provisions will also be included for shoreline modification. The regulations will be consistent with constitutional and other legal limitations on the regulation of private property. A draft SMP will be prepared consistent with the Shoreline Management Act and Shoreline Master Program guidelines including the following elements: Page 6 of 15 __.n___... ...._____n SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the EXHIBIT Washington State Department of Ecology and the ~ City of Federal Way PAGE 7 OF l.'Z- . Mapped existing and proposed shoreline environment designations together with their justification consistent with the guidelines; . Shoreline goals and policies which will serve as the shoreline element of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; . Development regulations. The shoreline development regulations shall identify shoreline uses and related standards applicable to the city's shorelines. . Administrative provisions setting forth city shoreline permit and enforcement procedures. The organizational format of the draft shoreline master program, as it relates to the City's existing comprehensive plan and development regulations, will be determined as part of this process. Deliverable: Draft SMP and development regulations includ.ing maps identifying shoreline environment designations within the City and PM. Date: November 1, 2006 Task 7: Restoration Plan Using information gathered from the inventory the city will develop a programmatic shoreline restoration plan. The plan will identify goals, priorities, projects, and administrative processes, and mechanisms and tools the city may use to restore areas within the shoreline jurisdiction where shoreline functions .. have been degraded or impaired. The restoration plan shall be prepared consistent with the shoreline guidelines, WAC 173-26-201 (2)(f), and will include the following elements: . Restoration goals and policies. . Identification of potential and prioritized restoration sites. . Identification of existing restoration projects and programs that will contribute to the city's restoration goals. . Identification of opportunities for shoreline protection, restoration, and public access. . Development of an implementation strategy identifying appropriate funding sources, restoration project time lines and benchmarks. Deliverables: Restoration plan and implementation strategy. Due Date: December 15, 2006. Page 7 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the Washington State Department of Ecology and the EXHIBIT B City of Federal Way PAGE g OF 22- Task 8: Conduct Cumulative Impact Analysis In conjunction with drafting goals, policies and regulations, prepare a cumulative impact analysis as required by the Guidelines. The analysis will identify how the city will achieve no net loss of ecological functions at build out and will include planning and engineering solutions to address identified impacts. The cumulative impacts analysis shall be prepared consistent with the Guidelines, WAC 173-26-201(3)(d)(iii). This includes evaluating the incremental impacts of proposed policies, designations and regulations on shoreline ecological functions as well as on other functions and uses of the shoreline consistent with the SMA (e.g. water-oriented uses, public access, etc). Deliverable: Report on results of analysis, including supporting maps and/or graphics. Due Date: January 15, 2007. Task 9: Conduct Environmental Review Conduct environmental review pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act. Deliverables: Copy of the environmental determination. Due Date: February 22,2007. Task 10: Adoption of Final SMP Conduct a review and adoption process for the final draft SMP as provided in the SMA, WAC 173-26. The final proposed SMA shall contain goals, policies and regulations, required administrative provisions, environment designations and final SMP jurisdictional boundaries. The City shall complete public review and the adoption process for the SMP amendment, and adoption by local elected body. Deliverables: Adopted SMP including maps and diagrams, and any relevant supporting docu mentation. Due Date: June 29, 2007. balance of page left blank intentionally Page 8 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the EXHIBIT -B-- Washington State Department of Ecology and the City of Federal Way PAGE 1 OF 22 t Deliverables (to Ecology) ~ All products, reports, and payment requests shall be sent to the attention of: Sandra Lange, Project Officer Department of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program 3190 _160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 II Budget II Very Important Note: Due to state law, all state funds that are disbursed to local governments under these grants are appropriated in the state budget on an annual basis within the 2-year project. Funds appropriated for the first year of the grant will need to be spent on eligible activities by the end of the fiscal year (June 30, 2006). Local governments are not allowed to carry unexpended funds past that date. We are aware that state and local fiscal years are not on the same schedule; however, state law requires strict adherence to the state fiscal year for state contracts. Maximum Eligible Grant Share, Year 1: $ 71,050 Maximum Eligible Grant Share, Year 2: $ 81.950 Total Eligible Project Cost: $153,000 Deviations from the line~item budget are allowed, but in no circumstances may the Recipient exceed the total project cost. If deviations exceed 10% within any task, the Ecology Project Officer may require a budget amendment to redistribute costs among tasks. When submitting invoices to Ecology, the Recipient shall itemize all costs by task and provide subtotals by task on Ecology's Form C2, Voucher Support Form. All payment requests must have forms A, B, C (and D if applicable) and receive Ecology Project Officer approval before any payment can be released. *Indirect Rate. The indirect rate shall not exceed 25% of Ecology paid direct staff labor and benefit costs. This rate covers space utilities, miscellaneous copying, telephone, motor pool, janitorial services, records storage, rental, county fiscal and legal services, etc. Items not included in this list shall be reoorted with the first na\lment reauest and shall remain consistent for the life of the orant. Each quarterly payment request shall be accompanied by a commensurate progress report available online at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/grants/smp/forms.html. The DEPARTMENT's source of funds is provisoed by (Budget Bill ESSB 6090) to implement shoreline management. Page 9 of 15 o 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 o 0 ~O 0 ~ O~ 0 ~ ~o o 0 m~ 0 ~ N 0 ~ ~~ _I CO I() N~ ~ "Of 0 CO') 0) r:ri~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N 0 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ N ~ C1 OLL. 0 0 0 0 0 I g g g g g 0) N N 0) N ~() ~~ ~~~ -- m -- 000 000 .... ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~CJ ....:co.ico.i ~-co.iN """~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Wa.; 000 000 000 000 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 000 000 000 000 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ....: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y) ~ 000 000 g ~ g 8 ~ g ~ ~ N r:ri ~ N r:ri ..... ~ N ~ ,Y) N ~ a ~ ~ 0 ~ Q) 000 000 ~ ~ g ~ g 8 ~ ~ ....: ~ ~ ....: ~ Y) ~ ~ Y) ~ o 0 00 0 0 00 o 0 00 0 0 00 o 0 O~ 0 0 O~ N ~ ....:~ N I() "":Y) ~ ~ ~ Y) ~ ~ Y) ~ 00000 ~ 0 0 ,0 ~ Q) ~ ~ 0 0 ~ =~ ~ .....: -of N ~ e:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q)'O Q) e: ~co 0 0 0 Q)~ 0 0 0 D~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ N ~ ~o Y) ~o oW go 0 0 0 0 0 o~ 0 0 0 0 0 ,ne: 0 CO') N ~ ~ '-'Q) . fA- ~ - ~ . E ~ ;; at:: Z co ~a. ffi Q) EO ~ Q)Q):re 2 2 2 Q) ~ > t;::: t;::: t;::: 5,2-;;; Q) Q) Q) <{ (I) t::: e: e: e: -Q) Q)- ~ Q)~ ~ Q)~ ~ ~~'O toe: C COe: c toe: c e:BQ) -COwcoW -rowrow -COwcow ~ OlLL If) :!: (J) Q) ~ w:!: Q) Q) ~ If) :!: (J) (J) ~ m e: .~ :::l 0 If) 0 - 0 .~ :::l 0 W 0 - 0 .Q) :::l 0 If) 0 - 0 '-' .- ..... ~ If)'- '0.- Q) (J) L.. If) .- '0'- (J) (J) C If)'- '0.- Q) Q) _~O roe:~a~>~ coe:~a~>~ coe:~a~>~ _If)~ roaQ)aQ)~'O roaQ)aQ)~'O roaQ)aQ)~-c ~ ~ 0 (I) () (I) C9 (I) I- E (I) () C/) <9 (I) I- E (I) () (I) C9 (I) I- E SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the EXHIBIT B Washington State Department of Ecology and the City of Federal Way PAGE 1\ OF 2'L. Special Terms & Conditions for SMP Grants 1. Administrative Guidelines. The RECIPIENT shall comply with the DEPARTMENT's current edition of "Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans", publication number 91-18. The RECIPIENT shall be responsible for maintaining appropriate financial records throughout the life of the project and in accordance with these guidelines. 2. Reimbursement: Grants are awarded on a reimbursable basis. The RECIPIENT initially pays project costs in full. Upon presentation of a billing to the DEPARTMENT, the DEPARTMENT's share of the project is reimbursed to the RECIPIENT. 3. Requests for Reimbursement. Requests for reimbursement shall be submitted at least auarterly but not more than once per month by the RECIPIENT on state invoice voucher forms. Payment requests are to include at a minimum Form A19-1A "Invoice Voucher", Form B, "Running Budget Summary", Form C: Voucher Support" and Form 0 "Contractor Participation Report" (if applicable). All requests for payment are to be accomoanied bva commensurate progress report. NOTE: Ecology forms are contained in the "Administrative Guidelines for Ecology Grants and Loans" and must be used for payment requests. Otherwise requests will be returned to the RECIPIENT for submittal on the correct forms. Electronic copies of these forms and the "Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans" ("Yellow Book") are available at Ecology's websites: . Forms - http://www.ecy.wa,Qov/biblio/9118A.html . Yellow Book -htto://www.ecy.wa.aov/biblio/9118.html Back-up Documentation. Complete backup documents (including but not limited to all invoiced costs, time sheets [signed and dated by both employee and supervisor], etc.) must be maintained by the RECIPIENT. These expenses shall be kept in grant files according to budget task for a period of three years after project completion and made available at any time for inspection by the DEPARTMENT. Right to Audit: The RECIPIENT agrees that payment(s) made under this grant shall be subject to reduction for amount charged thereto which are found after audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this grant. The RECIPIENT shall refund by check payable to the DEPARTMENT the amount of such reduction of payments under completed or terminated grants. 4. Progress Reports. The RECIPIENT shall prepare and submit quarterly progress reports to the DEPARTMENT. Reports shall be submitted no later than 20 calendar days after the end of the reporting period. Page 11 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the EXHIBIT PJ Washington State Department of Ecology and the City of Federal Way PAGE--1..2-0F 22- First Quarter October 20,2005 Second Quarter January 20, 2006 Third Quarter April 20, 2006 Fourth Quarter July 20,2006 : ; ;; ili(jp7 Ii "J:::.::::_, First Quarter July 1 - September 30 October 20,2006 Second Quarter October 1 - December 31 January 20, 2007 Third Quarter January 1 - March 31 April 20, 2007 Fourth Quarter April 1 - June 30 July 20, 2007 A progress report form is available on line at: http://www.ecY.wa. qov/proQ rams/sea/qrants/smp/forms. html and includes: Report Contents: Quarterly reports should be concise and should include the following: - Comparison of actual accomplishments by task to the objectives established for the reporting period - List deliverables due to Ecology by date of this progress report and their status. - Status of project schedule - Budget status - Personnel changes - Any difficulties encountered during the quarter 5. Project Completion Reoort: The purpose of this report is to document that the project and each of its tasks has been completed. The project completion report is to be submitted with the final invoice and must contain a brief(200-300 words) description of the work accomplished under the grant by task. County or City Name Grant No. G0600_ 6. Identification of Project Materials - All reports, maps, and other documents published as part of this grant agreement shall carry the name of the RECIPIENT, Ecology's grant number (in the Project Title upper right hand corner), title, the specific task number of the Task Title product and date centered on the front cover or title page (or in Task Number the case of maps, the block which contains the name of the Date Government unit or Department) and acknowledgment of the source of funding as follows: 7. Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan. IF this project involves the collection of environmental measurement data, the RECIPIENT needs to prepare a QAlQC plan to ensure the consistent application of quality assurance principles to the planning and execution of all activities involved in generating this data. The plan shall be conducted in accordance with the DEPARTMENT's Guidelines and Soecifications for Preparinq Quality Assurance Proiect Plans for Environmental Studies, current edition, (Ecology Publication No. 91-16). The plan must describe the monitoring and data quality objectives, procedures, and methodologies which will be used to ensure that all environmental data generated will meet these requirements. The size and complexity of the plan should be cost effective and in proportion to the magnitude of the sampling effort. The RECIPIENT may also reference Page 12 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the EXHIBIT B Washington State Department of Ecology and the City of Federal Way PAGE I? OF 2..2- Technical Guidance for Assessina the Quality of Aauatic Environments, February 1994 (Ecology Publication No. 91-78), in developing the plan. The QAlQC report shall be limited to a concise description of the environmental measurement aspects of this project. Ecology's Project Officer shall review and approve this plan prior to initiation of work. The QAlQC plan may describe the following elements: . Assumptions that direct the collection and analysis; . Resources used (such as flights for aerial photos); . Resource documents that will be consulted; . Field methods employed; . Office methods employed; . Training level of staff involved in data collection and analysis; . Equipment 1 materials to be used and accurate calibration assurance. 8. Coordination with Ecology's Geographicallnfonnation System (GIS). If this project involves developing GIS data, the RECIPIENT shall coordinate with Ecology's GIS office in an effort to promote compatibility and to encourage sharing of geospatial data. To facilitate data sharing, the DEPARTMENT utilizes the following standards: ESRl's ARCIINFO Current version ESRI's ArcView Current Version Horizontal Datum North American Datum 1983 (1991 adjustment) as defined by the National Geodetic Survey. (Also referred to as: NAD83/91) Vertical Datum NGVD 29 or NGVD 88 Projection System Lambert Conic Conformal Coordinate The system of plane coordinates established by the National Geodetic System & Zone Survey for defining and stating the positions or locations of points on the surface of the earth within the state of Washington is referred to as the Washington Coordinate System of 1983. The coordinate system standard is Washington Coordinate System of 1983 (WCS 83) zone appropriate for geo-datasets that are maintained fully within the WCS 83 North zone or, WCS 83 South zone. The standard is Washington Coordinate System of 1983 South zone if the geo-dataset is maintained as a statewide layer or, a regional layer crossing zones. Coordinate Units US Survey Foot. The standard conversion of coordinates between the meter and the US survey foot shall be based upon the length of the meter being equal to exactly 39.37 inches. Accuracy +1-40 Feet (1 :24,000) minimum accuracy to within a foot of the true Standard North American datum system Vector Import ArcExport, DLG and/or DXF, shapefiles Format Raster Import TIFF, BILlBIP, RLC,GRID,ERDAS Format Page 13 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the EXHIBIT 15 Washington State Department of Ecology and the City of Federal Way PAGE OF 22- I'{ Whenever possible, the Recipient is encouraged to utilize the standards listed above when compiling data. The State's data management information is also available at the following website: http://www.dis.wa.qov/portfolio/. Please contact John Tooley (360-407-6418, itoo461 @ecy.wa.Qov ) for more information. The Recipient shall submit copies to Ecology's Project Officer with complete documentation as it relates to all digital data, GIS coverages, shape files, related tables and map products. 9. Washington State Minority and Women's Business Participation. The RECIPIENT agrees to solicit and recruit, to the maximum extent possible, certified minority-owned (MBE) and women-owned (WBE) businesses in purchases and contracts initiated after the effective date of this Agreement. In the absence of more stringent goals established by the RECIPIENT's jurisdiction, the RECIPIENT agrees to utilize the DEPARTMENT'S goals for minority- and women-owned business participation in all bid packages, request for proposals, and purchase orders. These goals are expressed as a percentage of the total dollars available for the purchase or contract and are as follows: Construction/Public Works 10% MBE 6%WBE Architectu re/Eng ineering 10% MBE 6%WBE Purchased Goods 8% MBE 4%WBE Purchased Services 10% MBE 4%WBE Professional Services 10% MBE 4%WBE No contract award or rejection shall be made based on achievement or non- achievement of the goals. AChievement of the goals is encouraged, however, and the RECIPIENT and ALL prospective bidders or persons submitting qualifications shall take the following affirmative steps in any procurement initiated after the effective date of this Agreement a. Include qualified minority and women's businesses on solicitation lists. b. Assure that qualified minority and women's businesses are solicited whenever they are potential sources of services or supplies. c. Divide the total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities, to permit maximum participation by qualified minority and women's businesses. d. Establish delivery schedules, where work requirements permit, which will encourage participation of qualified minority and women's businesses. e. Use the services and assistance of the State Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises (OMWBE) and the Office of Minority Business Enterprises of the U.S. DEPARTMENT of Commerce, as appropriate By signing this Agreement, the RECIPIENT certifies that the above steps were, or will be followed. Any contractor engaged by the RECIPIENT under this agreement shall be required to follow the above five affirmative steps in the award of any subcontract(s). The RECIPIENT shall report to the DEPARTMENT at the time of submitting each invoice, on forms provided by the DEPARTMENT, payments made to qualified firms. The report will address: Page 14 of 15 SMA Grant Agreement No. G0600119 between the Washington State Department of Ecology and the EXHIBIT ~ City of Federal Way PAGE (1? OF 2-z.. a. Name and state OMWBE certification number of any qualified firm receiving funds under the voucher, including any sub-and/or sub-subcontractors. b. The total dollar amount paid to qualified firms under this invoice. 10. Consistency: It is the responsibility of the Recipient to ensure that all sub-recipients and contractors comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement and that the State of Washington is named as an express third-party beneficiary of such subcontracts with full rights as such. 11. Grant Closeout: All products for this project shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT on or before Julv 20. 2007 or otherwise specified in the Scope of Work. Completed end-of- biennium estimate forms and final payment requests must be submitted in accordance with notification provided by Ecology's Fiscal Office. 12. All Writings Contained Herein. This agreement, the appended "General Terms and Conditions", and the DEPARTMENT'S current edition of "Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans", contains the entire understanding between the parties, and there are no other understandings or representations except those set forth or incorporated by reference herein. No subsequent modification(s) or amendment(s) of this agreement shall be of any force or effect unless in writing, signed by authorized representatives of the RECIPIENT and DEPARTMENT, and made a part of this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this Grant Agreement State of Washington Department of Ecology City of Federal Way Gordon White Date Signature, Authorized Official Date Program Manager Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Print Name of Authorized Official Title, Authorized Official Federal Identification Number: 91-1462550 Approved as to form only by the Assistant Attorney General Page 15 of 15 ...... Sworn Statement of Compliance* --=- with - Minorityw and Womanwowned WA SKI N G ION S TA 1 f Of r H T ~ f N 1 of Business Utilization Requirements ECOLOGY Recipient Grant Number *NOTE: MWBE goals are voluntary. No contracting decision should be made based on whether or not the goals are achieved. The following affirmative steps in awarding contracts and subcontracts will be taken: 1. Include qualified minority and women's business on solicitation lists; 2. Insure that qualified minority and women's businesses are solicited whenever they are potential sources of services or supplies; 3. Divide the total requirements, when economically feasible into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by qualified minority, and women's business; 4. Establish delivery schedules, where requirements of the work permit, which will encourage participation of qualified minority and women's business; and 5. Use the services and assistance of the state Office of Minority and Woman Owned-Business, and the Office of Minority Business Enterprises of the U.S. Department of Commerce as appropriate. Authorized Signature Date Title State of County of }ss Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of residing in My commission expires Signature of notary EXHIBIT B PAGE {c, OF u -.--.... EXHIBIT 13 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS PAGE ,~ OF 2..L Pertaining to Grant and Loan Agreements of the Department of Ecology A. RECIPIENT PERFORMANCE All activities for which granUloan funds are to be used shall be accomplished by the RECIPIENT and RECIPIENT's employees. The RECIPIENT shall not assign or subcontract performance to others unless specifically authorized in writing by the DEPARTMENT. B. SUBGRANTEE/CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE The RECIPIENT must ensure that all subgrantees and contractors comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement. C. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY The RECIPIENT shall ensure that in all subcontracts entered into by the RECIPIENT pursuant to this agreement, the state of Washington is named as an expfess third-party beneficiary of such subcontracts with full rights as such. D. CONTRACTING FOR SERVICES (BIDDING) Contracts for construction, purchase of equipment and professional architectural and engineering services shall be awarded through a competitive process, if required by State law. RECIPIENT shall retain copies of all bids received and contracts awarded, for inspection and use by the DEPARTMENT. E. ASSIGNMENTS No right or claim of the RECI PI ENT arising under this agreement shall be transferred or assigned by the RECIPIENT. F. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS 1. The RECIPIENT shall comply fully with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, orders, regulations and permits. Prior to commencement of any construction, the RECIPIENT shall secure the necessary approvals and permits required by authorities having jurisdiction over the project, provide assurance to the DEPARTMENT that all approvals and permits have been secured, and make copies available to the DEPARTMENT upon request. 2. Discrimination. The DEPARTMENT and the RECIPIENT agree to be bound by all Federal and State laws, regulations, and policies against discrimination. The RECIPIENT further agrees to affirmatively support the program of the Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises to the maximum extent possible. The RECIPIENT shall report to the DEPARTMENT the percent of granUloan funds available to women or minority owned businesses. 3. Wages And Job Safety. The RECIPIENT agrees to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies of the United States and the State of Washington which affect wages and job safety. 4. Industrial Insurance. The RECIPIENT certifies full compliance with all applicable state industrial insurance requirements. If the RECIPIENT fails to comply with such laws, the DEPARTMENT shall have the right to immediately terminate this agreement for cause as provided in Section K.1, herein. G. KICKBACKS The RECIPIENT is prohibited from inducing by any means any person employed or otherwise involved in this project to give up any part of the compensation to which he/she is otherwise entitled or, receive any fee, commission or gift in return for award of a subcontract hereunder. H. AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS 1. The RECIPIENT shall maintain complete program and financial records relating to this agreement. Such records shall clearly indicate total receipts and expenditures by fund source and task or object. All granUloan records shall be kept in a manner which provides an audit trail for all expenditures. All records shall be kept in a common file to facilitate audits and inspections. I EXHIBIT B PAGE I'D OF lZ Engineering documentation and field inspection reports of all construction work accomplished under this agreement shall be maintained by the RECIPIENT. 2. All grant/loan records shall be open for audit or inspection by the DEPARTMENT or by any duly authorized audit representative of the State of Washington for a period of at least three years after the final grant payment/loan repayment or any dispute resolution hereunder. If any such audits identify discrepancies in the financial records, the RECIPIENT shall provide clarification and/or make adjustments accordingly. 3. All work performed under this agreement and any equipment purchased, shall be made available to the DEPARTMENT and to any authorized state, federal or local representative for inspection at any time during the course of this agreement and for at least three years following grant/loan termination or dispute resolution hereunder. 4. RECIPIENT shall meet the provisions in OMB Circular A-133 (Audits of States, Local Governments & Non Profit Organizations), including the compliance Supplement to OMB Circular A-133, if the RECIPIENT expends $300,000 or more in a year in Federal funds. The $300,000 threshold for each year is a cumulative total of all federal funding from all sources. The RECIPIENT must forward a copy of the audit along with the RECIPIENT'S response and the final corrective action plan to the DEPARTMENT within ninety (90) days of the date of the audit report. I. PERFORMANCE REPORTING The RECIPIENT shall submit progress reports to the DEPARTMENT with each payment request or such other schedule as set forth in the Special Conditions. The RECIPIENT shall also report in writing to the DEPARTMENT any problems, delays or adverse conditions which will materially affect their ability to meet project objectives or time schedules. This disclosure shall be accompanied by a statement of the action taken or proposed and any assistance needed from the DEPARTMENT to resolve the situation. Payments may be withheld if required progress reports are not submitted. Quarterly reports shall cover the periods January 1 through March 31, April 1 through June 30, July 1 through September 30, and October 1 through December 31. Reports shall be due within twenty (20) days following the end of the quarter being reported. J. COMPENSATION 1. Method of compensation. Payment shall normally be made on a reimbursable basis as specified in the grant agreement and no more often than once per month. Each request for payment will be submitted by the RECIPIENT on State voucher request forms provided by the DEPARTMENT along with documentation of the expenses. Payments shall be made for each task/phase of the project, or portion thereof, as set out in the Scope of Work when completed by the RECIPIENT and certified as satisfactory by the Project Officer. The payment request form and supportive documents must itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in the Scope of Work. Instructions for submitting the payment requests are found in "Administrative Requirements forEcology Grants and Loans", part IV, published by the DEPARTMENT. A copy of this document shall be furnished to the RECIPIENT. When payment requests are approved by the DEPARTMENT, payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee. Payment requests shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT and directed to the Project Officer assigned to administer this agreement. 2. Budget deviation. Deviations in budget amounts are not allowed without written amendment(s) to this agreement. Payment requests will be disallowed when the RECIPIENT's request for reimbursement exceeds the State maximum share amount for that element, as described in the Scope of Work. 3. Period of Compensation. Payments shall only be made for action of the RECIPIENT pursuant to the grant/loan agreement and performed after the effective date and prior to the expiration date of this agreement, unless those dates are specifically modified in writing as provided herein. 4. Final Request(s) for Payment. The RECIPIENT must submit final requests for compensation within forty-five(45) days after the expiration date of this agreement and within fifteen (15) days after the end of a fiscal biennium. Failure to comply may result in delayed reimbursement. 2 EXHIBIT B PAGE Ii OF 2. L 5. Performance Guarantee. The DEPARTMENT may withhold an amount not to exceed ten percent (10%) of each reimbursement payment as security for the RECIPIENT's performance and a financial bond. Monies withheld by the DEPARTMENT may be paid to the RECIPIENT when the project(s) described herein, or a portion thereof, have been completed if, in the DEPARTMENT's sole discretion, such payment is reasonable and approved according to this agreement and, as appropriate, upon completion of an audit as specified under section J.G. herein. 6. Unauthorized Expenditures. All payments to the RECIPIENT shall be subject to final audit by the DEPARTMENT and any unauthorized expenditure(s) charged to this granUloan shall be refunded to the DEPARTMENT by the RECIPIENT. 7. Mileage and Per Diem. If mileage and per diem are paid to the employees of the RECIPIENT or other public entities, it shall not exceed the amount allowed under state law for state employees. 8. Overhead Costs. No reimbursement for overhead costs shall be allowed unless provided for in the Scope of Work hereunder. K. TERMINATION 1. For Cause. The obligation of the DEPARTMENT to the RECIPIENT is contingent upon satisfactory performance by the RECIPIENT of all of its obligations under this agreement. In the event the RECIPIENT unjustifiably fails, in the opinion of the DEPARTMENT, to perform any obligation required of it by this agreement, the DEPARTMENT may refuse to pay any further funds thereunder and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination. A written notice of termination shall be given at least five working days prior to the effective date of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or other materials prepared by the RECIPIENT under this agreement, at the option of the DEPARTMENT, shall become Department property and the RECIPIENT shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials. Despite the above, the RECIPIENT shall not be relieved of any liability to the DEPARTMENT for damages sustained by the DEPARTMENT and/or the State of Washington because of any breach of agreement by the RECIPIENT. The DEPARTMENT may withhold payments for the purpose of setoff until such time as the exact amount of damages due the DEPARTMENT from the RECIPIENT is determined. 2. Insufficient Funds. The obligation of the DEPARTMENT to make payments is contingent on the availability of state and federal funds through legislative appropriation and state allotment. When this agreement crosses over state fiscal years the obligation of the DEPARTMENT is contingent upon the appropriation of funds during the next fiscal year. The failure to appropriate or allot such funds shall be good cause to terminate this agreement as provided in paragraph K.1 above. When this agreement crosses the RECIPIENT's fiscal year, the obligation of the RECIPIENT to continue or complete the project described herein shall be contingent upon appropriation of funds by the RECIPIENT's governing body; Provided, howevef, that nothing contained herein shall preclude the DEPARTMENT from demanding repayment of ALL funds paid to the RECIPIENT in accordance with Section 0 herein. 3. Failure to Commence Work. In the event the RECIPIENT fails to commence work on the project funded herein within four months after the effective date of this agreement, or by any date mutually agreed upon in writing for commencement of work, the DEPARTMENT reserves the right to terminate this agreement. L. WAIVER Waiver of any RECIPIENT default is not a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver of a breach of any provision of this agreement is not a waiver of any subsequent breach and will not be construed as a modification of the terms of this agreement unless stated as such in writing by the authofized representative of the DEPARTMENT. 3 EXHIBIT (3 PAGE 20 OF 2-1- M. PROPERTY RIGHTS 1. Copyrights and Patents. When the RECIPIENT creates any copyrightable materials or invents any patentable property, the RECIPIENT may copyright or patent the same but the DEPARTMENT retains a royalty-free, nonexclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, recover or otherwise use the material(s) or property and to authorize others to use the same for federal, state or local government purposes. Where federal funding is involved, the federal government may have a proprietary interest in patent rights to any inventions that are developed by the RECIPIENT as provided in 35 U.$.C. 200-212. 2. Publications. When the RECIPIENT or persons employed by the RECIPIENT use or publish information of the DEPARTMENT; present papers, lectures, or seminars involving information supplied by the DEPARTMENT; use logos, reports, maps or other data, in printed reports, signs, brochures, pamphlets, etc., appropriate credit shall be given to the DEPARTMENT. 3. Tangible Property Rights. The DEPARTMENT's current edition of "Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans", Part V, shall control the use and disposition of all real and personal property purchased wholly or in part with funds furnished by the DEPARTMENT in the absence of state, federal statute(s), regulation(s), or policy(s) to the contrary or upon specific instructions with respect thereto in the Scope of Work. 4. Personal Property Furnished by the DEPARTMENT. When the DEPARTMENT provides personal property directly to the RECIPIENTfor use in performance of the project, it shall be returned to the DEPARTMENT prior to final payment by the DEPARTMENT. If said property is lost, stolen or damaged while in the RECIPIENT's possession, the DEPARTMENT shall be reimbursed in cash or by setoff by the RECIPIENT for the fair market value of such property. 5. Acquisition Projects. The following provisions shall apply if the project covered by this agreement includes funds for the acquisition of land or facilities: a. Prior to disbursement of funds provided for in this agreement, the RECIPIENT shall establish that the cost of land/or facilities is fair and reasonable. b. The RECIPIENT shall provide satisfactory evidence of title or ability to acquire title for each parcel prior to disbursement of funds provided by this agreement. Such evidence may include title insurance policies, Torrens certificates, or abstracts, and attorney's opinions establishing that the land is free from any impediment, lien, or claim which would impair the uses contemplated by this agreement. 6. Conversions. Regardless of the contract termination date shown on the cover sheet, the RECIPIENT shall not at any time convert any equipment, property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this agreement to uses other than those for which assistance was originally approved without prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. Such approval may be conditioned upon payment to the DEPARTMENT of that portion of the proceeds of the sale, lease or other conversion or encumbrance which monies granted pursuant to this agreement bear to the total acquisition, purchase or construction costs of such property. N. RECYCLEruRECYCLABLEPAPER All documents and materials published under this agreement shall be produced on recycled paper containing the highest level of post consumer and recycled content that is available. At a minimum, paper with 10 percent post consumer content and 50 percent recycled content shall be used. Whenever possible, all materials shall be published on paper that is unbleached or has not been treated with chlorine gas and/or hypochlorite. As appropriate, all materials shall be published on both sides of the paper and shall minimize the use of glossy or colored paper and other items which reduce the recyclability of the document. O. RECOVERY OF PAYMENTS TO RECIPIENT The right of the RECIPIENT to retain monies paid to it as reimbursement payments is contingent upon satisfactory performance of thisagreement including the satisfactory completion of the project described in the Scope of Work. In the event the RECIPIENT fails, for any reason, to perform obligations required of it by this agreement, the RECIPIENT may, at the DEPARTMENT's sole discretion, be required _. 4 EXHIBIT J3, PAGE 2.{ OF 22.... to repay to the DEPARTMENT all granUloan funds disbursed to the RECIPIENT for those parts of the project that are rendered worthless in the opinion of the DEPARTMENT by such failure to perform. Interest shall accrue at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum from the time the DEPARTMENT demands repayment of funds. If payments have been discontinued by the DEPARTMENT due to insufficient funds as in Section K.2 above, the RECIPIENT shall not be obligated to repay monies which had been paid to the RECIPIENT prior to such termination. Any property acquired under this agreement, at the option of the DEPARTMENT, may become the DEPARTMENT'S property and the RECIPIENT'S liability to repay monies shall be reduced by an amount reflecting the fair value of such property. P. PROJECT APPROVAL The extent and character of all work and services to be performed under this agreement by the RECIPIENT shall be subject to the review and approval of the DEPARTMENT through the Project Officer or other designated official to whom the RECIPIENT shall report and be responsible. In the event there is a dispute with regard to the extent and character of the work to be done, the determination of the Project Officer or other designated official as to the extent and character of the work to be done shall govern. The RECIPIENT shall have the right to appeal decisions as provided for below. Q. DISPUTES Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this agreement which is not disposed of in wfiting shall be decided by the Project Officer or other designated official who shall provide a written statement of decision to the RECIPIENT. The decision of the Project Officer or other designated official shall be final and conclusive unless, within thirty days from the date of receipt of such statement, the RECIPIENT mails or otherwise furnishes to the Director of the DEPARTMENT a written appeal. In connection with appeal of any proceeding under this clause, the RECIPIENT shall have the opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of this appeal. The decision of the Director or duly authorized representative for the determination of such appeals shall be final and conclusive. Appeals frorn the Director's determination shall be brought in the Superior Court of Thurston County. Review of the decision of the Director will not be sought before either the Pollution Control Hearings Board or the Shoreline Hearings Board. Pending final decision of dispute hereunder, the RECIPIENT shall proceed diligently with the performance of this agreement and in accordance with the decision .J rendered. R. CONFLICT OF INTEREST No officer, member, agent, or employee of either party to this agreement who exercises any function or responsibility in the review, approval, or carrying out of this agreement, shall participate in any decision which affects his/her personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he/she is, directly or indirectly interested; nor shall he/she have any personal or pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, in this agreement or the proceeds thereof. S. INDEMNIFICATION 1. The DEPARTMENT shall in no way be held fesponsible for payment of salaries, consultant's fees, and other costs related to the project described herein, except as provided in the Scope of Work. 2. To the extent that the Constitution and laws of the State of Washington permit, each party shall indemnify and hold the other harmless from and against any liability for any or all injuries to persons or property arising from the negligent act or omission of that party or that party's agents or employees arising out of this agreement. T. GOVERNING LAW This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. U. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this agreement or any provision of any document incorporated by reference shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provision, and to this end the provisions of this agreement are declared to be severable. 5 EXHIBIT ES PAGE 22- OF 22- V. PRECEDENCE In the event of inconsistency in this agreement, unless otherwise provided herein, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (a) applicable Federal and 8tate statutes and regulations; (b) Scope of Work; (c) Special Terms and Conditions; (d) Any terms incorporated herein by reference including the "Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans"; and (e) the General Terms and Conditions. 88-010 Rev. 05/02 6 City of Federal Way Scope of Work 2005-2007 Shoreline Master Program Grant October 31, 2005 Proiect Title: City of Federal Way Shoreline Master Program Update Back2round The City of Federal Way ("city") is located in King County ("county") with a population of85,800. The city's approximately 13.74 miles of shoreline environment includes both salt-water marine shoreline ofPuget Sound as well as various fresh water lakes. At the time of incorporation in 1990, the city adopted the county's Shoreline Master Program ("SMP"). In 1998, the city developed and adopted its own SMP that integrated the SMP into the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. In 1999, the city adopted associated development regulations. Subsequent to the December 2003 adoption of the Shoreline Master Program Guidelines ("Guidelines") by the Department of Ecology ("DOE"), an inventory of Federal Way's marine shoreline was conducted in January of 2004 as part of a report prepared for Seattle Public Utilities and WRIA 9. This is the most recent study ofthe city's shorelines; however, it only included the shorelines ofPuget Sound. At that time, other shorelines within the city limits included Steel Lake, the northwestern shore of Lake Killarney, and the western shore of North Lake. As of January 1, 2005, newly annexed areas include the eastern shore of North Lake. The eastern shores of North Lake and Lake Killarney are presently governed by county regulations, as are all the lakes in the city's potential annexation area ("PAA"). Additional lakes located within the city's P AA coming under purview of shoreline regulations are Star Lake, Lake Dolloff, Lake Geneva, the remaining portion of Lake Killamey and Five Mile Lake. A comprehensive update to the city's SMP is needed in three areas: 1) to inventory shorelines under the city's SMP jurisdiction, including newly annexed areas; 2) to inventory shorelines in the city's PAA; and, 3) to update the city's Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulations to meet current SMP regulations. The city will update the SMP to be consistent with the new Guidelines and the requirements ofthe Shoreline Management Act ("SMA"). The SMP development process will include an inventory and analysis of shoreline ecological conditions and land use within Federal Way city limits, the Potential Annexation Area (PAA) and adjacent basins with influence; review and update of goals, policies, environmental designations, and shoreline regulations based on an updated shoreline inventory, community input, and consistency with the requirements of the SMA; and a formal local adoption process. The EXHIBIT L.. PAGE / OF 7 1 city will incorporate public participation and coordination with Ecology and adjacent jurisdictions through all phases of SMP development. The SMP will be coordinated and integrated with the City's comprehensive plan and associated development regulations and shall be prepared in conformance with the SMA and the Guidelines, and Chapter 173-26 of the Washington Administrative Code ("W AC"). Qualified consultant support shall be used as appropriate. The following outlines the anticipated tasks in more detail: Task 1: Coordination The City will coordinate its efforts in several ways throughout the SMP process. Examples include: . Attendance at Ecology sponsored grantee coordination meetings . Outreach to adjacent jurisdictions to address transitions of shoreline areas and overlapping shoreline areas. . Contact other agencies, such as the county, for inventory and restoration plan data and information sharing. The city will work with the county to determine the information's availability and whether the timing and availability ofthe county's information is consistent with the city's schedule. This coordination may result in similar inventory and analysis approaches, development of compatible shoreline policies and regulations and coordinated public outreach and involvement. Deliverables: Documentation of contacts in quarterly progress reports. Due Date: April 3, 2006, July 3,2006, October 2,2004, January 2,2007, April 2, 2007 and June 29, 2007. Task 2: Hire Consultant Prepare a scope of work for consultant services consistent with this grant scope of work, request and review consultant proposals consistent with local procedures, and enter into a contract with the selected consultant. Deliverable: Final executed consulting contract. Due Date: January 31,2006. Task 3: Public Participation Process Inform and involve the public in updating the SMP during the update effort consistent with the SMA (see RCW 90.58.130) and the Parts I and II ofW AC 173-26. Prepare a public participation plan that identifies specific objectives, key parties and establishes timelines for public participation activities. Key element ofthe public participation plan will include: EXHIBIT ~ PAGE 2- OF ~ 2 ---..... . The city will coordinate with the DOE; communicate with state agencies, local agencies, and affected Indian tribes; and conduct a public involvement process consistent with the Guidelines when developing the SMP. . An interagency working group consisting of a DOE representative, representative of affected Indian tribes, and other affected agencies will be formed to review the work products. . A citizen task force consisting oflocal citizens and stakeholders will be formed to review the work products. . The city will prepare a public participation plan, which notifies all residents of the work program and a "Parties of Record" mailing list will be kept on file. Interested members of the public will be kept apprised of major steps in the process and be provided with draft documents at the SEP A, Planning Commission, City Council Subcommittee (Land Use/ Transportation Committee), and City Council stages via the city's web site. . A website will be developed for the project to provide a forum for the public to obtain information regarding the SMP update and to provide comments and input related to the project. Information on the website will include draft work products, a timeline for the update, and key contacts. Deliverable: Public participation plan consistent with RCW 90.58.130 and WAC 173- 26-090 and 100. Documentation of contacts through quarterly progress reports. Date Due: March 15,2006. Task 4: Conduct Inventory and Map Shoreline Conditions Conduct an inventory of shorelines within the limits of the city, the city's P AA and adjacent basins with influence on shoreline conditions within the City's SMA jurisdiction. The shoreline inventory shall be prepared consistent with the Guidelines, WAC 173-26-201. Compile pertinent and reasonably available data, plans, studies, inventories, and other applicable information and evaluate existing reports, information, aerial photos and GIS data. Working inventory maps at the appropriate scale for analysis (i.e. coarser resolution maps for adjacent lands and finer resolution for the shoreline jurisdiction characterization) will be created. Collect the following information to the extent that such information is relevant and reasonably obtainable: . Shoreline and adjacent land use patterns and transportation and utility facilities, including the extent of existing structures, impervious surfaces, vegetation and shoreline modifications in shoreline jurisdiction. . General location of any channel migration zones, floodplains and the floodway. . Critical areas, including wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, fish and wildlife conservation areas, geologically hazardous areas, frequently flooded areas as defined in RCW 36.70A, the Growth Management Act. . Degraded areas and sites with potential for ecological restoration. . Areas of special interest, such as priority habitats, rapidly developing waterfronts, previously identified toxic or hazardous material clean-up sites, or eroding shorelines. EXHIBIT C 3 PAGE 3- OF C; . Existing and potential shoreline public access sites, including public rights-of-way and utility corridors. The inventory will include. as available. descriptions of recorded public access easements, their prescribed use, maintenance and terms. . Historical aerial photographs documenting past conditions to assist in preparing an analysis of cumulative impacts of development. . Known archaeological. cultural and historic resources in shoreline jurisdiction. . Policies and regulations in shore land and adjacent areas that affect shorelines, such as surface water management and land use regulations (critical areas ordinance; flood ordinance). Deliverables: List of inventory data sources and digital working maps of inventory information displayed at appropriate scale. Due Date: June 21, 2006. Task 5: Analyze Shoreline Conditions Prepare a report and map portfolio analyzing shoreline issues of concern. consistent with the Guidelines (chapter 173-26-201 (3)(d)) WAC). This analysis will also consider cumulative impacts and identify measures to insure internal consistency between the provisions of the city's Comprehensive Plan, critical areas ordinance, and SMP as follows: A. Prepare a coarse analysis (characterization) of shoreline ecosystem processes influencing the area subject to shoreline jurisdiction including: . Description of ecological processes in the drainage basin linked to the shoreline through hydrologic flows. . Presentation of basic geographic context (geology, soils, vegetation and drainage patterns) and a description of how it is relevant to the shoreline. . Delineation of boundaries and mapping of the land and water area contained within the SMA jurisdiction- identifying the preliminary extent of SMA shorelines within the city's jurisdiction. addressing both the required minimum SMA jurisdiction areas and any optional (floodplain and critical area buffer) SMA jurisdiction areas for consideration and decision-making later in the SMA process. . Note location of major land uses, if any (e.g. sewage treatment plants). . Note location and nature of known pertinent regulatory activities (e.g. ESA listings; contaminated sites). . Identification of opportunities for protection/restoration of upland and adjacent areas essential for maintaining shoreline form and function. B. Characterize shoreline functions. Separating the shoreline into reaches based on land use and ecological processes, this more detailed characterization analysis will: . Describe the physical, biological and land use components associated with each shoreline reach within shoreline jurisdiction; EXHIBIT L PAGE 'i OF 1 4 . Evaluate and assess shoreline ecological functions based on current scientific understanding of the relationship between the conditions of ecosystem-wide processes and conditions within shoreline jurisdiction; C. Identify opportunities for protection, restoration, public access and shoreline use including: . Potential opportunities and possible impediments to the protection and restoration of ecological functions. . Current public access and opportunities for future access sites. . Opportunities for appropriate shoreline uses. This report will provide a foundation for establishing environment designations. The report should identify data gaps, focusing on information that would be useful to support SMP development and implementation. Maps at appropriate viewing scales will be prepared to illustrate findings. Potential areas for shoreline use, public access, restoration and/or protection will be indicated. The portfolio will list and map public access to shorelines. Delivefables: Report and map portfolio addressing the three items identified above. Date: August I, 2006. Task 6: Prepare Draft Shoreline Master Proeram and Shoreline Development Reeulations Prepare a draft SMP as a shoreline element ofthe city's GMA compliant comprehensive plan. The SMP will include goals, policies and environmental designations that are consistent with WAC 173-26-171 and 181. Goals and policies will be coordinated to ensure consistency between the comprehensive plan and the SMP. A map will be prepared which shows boundaries of environmental designations relative to comprehensive plan designations. Federal Way City Code Chapter 18, Article III, "Shoreline Management" (shoreline development regulations) shall be amended to include, at a minimum, specific policies and regulations for all shoreline uses and activities in each environment designation. Provisions will also be included for shoreline modification. The regulations will be consistent with constitutional and other legal limitations on the regulation of private property. A draft SMP will be prepared consistent with the Shoreline Management Act and Shoreline Master Program guidelines including the following elements: . Mapped existing and proposed shoreline environment designations together with their justification consistent with the guidelines; EXHIBIT L PAGE 5 OF 1 5 . Shoreline goals and policies which will serve as the shoreline element ofthe Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; . Development regulations. The shoreline development regulations shall identify shoreline uses and related standards applicable to the city's shorelines. . Administrative provisions setting forth city shoreline permit and enforcement procedures. The organizational format of the draft shoreline master program, as it relates to the City's existing comprehensive plan and development regulations, will be determined as part of this process. Deliverable: Draft SMP and development regulations including maps identifying shoreline environment designations within the city and P AA. Date: November 1,2006 Task 7: Restoration Plan Using information gathered from the inventory the city will develop a programmatic shoreline restoration plan. The plan will identify goals, priorities, projects, and administrative processes, and mechanisms and tools the city may use to restore areas within the shoreline jurisdiction where shoreline functions have been degraded or impaired. The restoration plan shall be prepared consistent with the shoreline guidelines, WAC 173-26-201(2)(f), and will include the following elements: . Restoration goals and policies. . Identification of potential and prioritized restoration sites. . Identification of existing restoration projects and programs that will contribute to the city's restoration goals. . Identification of opportunities for shoreline protection, restoration, and public access. . Development of an implementation strategy identifying appropriate funding sources, restoration project timelines and benchmarks. Deliverables: Restoration plan and implementation strategy. Due Date: December 15,2006. EXHIBIT C PAGE G:. OF Cj 6 Task 8: Conduct Cumulative Impact Analvsis In conjunction with drafting goals, policies and regulations, prepare a cumulative impact analysis as required by the Guidelines. The analysis will identify how the city will achieve no net loss of ecological functions at build out and will include planning and engineering solutions to address identified impacts. The cumulative impacts analysis shall be prepared consistent with the Guidelines, WAC 173-26-201 (3)( d)(iii). This includes evaluating the incremental impacts of proposed policies, designations and regulations on shoreline ecological functions as well as on other functions and uses of the shoreline consistent with the SMA (e.g. water-oriented uses, public access, etc). Deliverable: Report on results of analysis, including supporting maps and/or graphics. Due Date: January 15,2007. Task 9: Conduct Environmental Review Conduct environmental review pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act. Deliverables: Copy of the environmental determination. Due Date: February 22,2007. Task 10: Adoption of Final SMP Conduct a review and adoption process for the final draft SMP as provided in the SMA, WAC 173-26. The final proposed SMA shall contain goals, policies and regulations, required administrative provisions, environment designations and final SMP jurisdictional boundaries. The city shall complete public review and the adoption process for the SMP amendment, and adoption by local elected body. Deliverables: Adopted SMP including maps and diagrams, and any relevant supporting documentation. Due Date: June 29, 2007. Attachments . Shoreline Master Program Update Timeline EXHIBIT c... PAGE 7 OF 1 7 City of Federal Way Shoreline Master Program Update Timeline October 31, 2005 August 26, 2005 draft scope to WSDOE September 30, 2005 final scope to WSDOE October 28, 2005 grant secured from WSDOE November 7,2005 grant acceptance by LUTe November 15, 2005 grant acceptance by city council . TASK 1 COORDINATION Ongoing . TASK 2 HIRE CONSULTANT November 21,2005 issue request for proposals December 12, 2005 request for proposals due December 21, 2005 consultant interviews January 27,2006 consultant contract executed January 31, 2006 consultant contract to WSDOE . TASK 3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS March 15,2006 public participation plan to WSDOE . TASK 4 CONDUCT INVENTORY AND MAP SHORELINE CONDITIONS May 10, 2006 technical advisory committee meeting May 10, 2006 citizen task force meeting June 21, 2006 inventory to WSDOE . TASK 5 ANAL YZE SHORELINE CONDITIONS July 12,2006 technical advisory committee meeting July 12, 2006 citizen task force meeting August 1, 2006 shoreline conditions report to WSDOE . TASK 6 PREP ARE DRAFT SMP AND SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS August 9,2006 technical advisory committee meeting August 9, 2006 citizen task force meeting October 4, 2006 technical advisory committee meeting October 4,2006 citizen task force meeting November 1, 2006 draft shoreline master program to WSDOE . TASK 7 RESTORATION PLAN November 8, 2006 technical advisory committee meeting November 8, 2006 citizen task force meeting December 15,2006 restoration plan to WSDOE . TASK 8 CONDUCT CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS December 7,2006 technical advisory committee meeting December 7, 2006 citizen task force meeting January 15, 2007 cumulative impact analysis to WSDOE . TASK 9 CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW January 18, 2007 threshold determination issued February 7, 2007 DNS comment period ends February 21,2007 DNS appeal period ends EXHIBIT L. PAGE 8 OF ; 8 February 22,2007 SEP A completed . TASK 10 Adoption of Final SMP February 7,2007 planning commission workshop February 16,2007 advance notification to CTED of code adoption February 21,2007 planning commission public hearing March 7, 2007 planning commission recommendation March 19,2007 LUTC workshop April 2, 2007 LUTC recommendation April 17, 2007 city council ordinance first reading May 1, 2007 city council ordinance second reading June 29, 2007 shoreline management plan to WSDOE EXHIBIT L PAGE-LOF Cj 9 -I:J'-IG)()(J)-I -I:J'-I(j)()(J)~ -I:J'-I(j)()(J)~ 0 00.0)001ll0 00.0)001ll 00.0)001ll ~ -1=;-< o:::l 00- -I :::;. < 0 :::l ar 0 --I :::;. < 0 :::l ar 0 )> ro ro a. (fl :::!. !!. )> CD CD a. (fl :::!. 0) )> CD ro a. (fl :::!. c.n 0 ,(l-(fl5..rotD ,(l-(fl5..CD"Tl ,(l-(fl5..CD"T1 C" ,..... W""'C/) ,.... Q.)""" (/1 _f ,...... m""" (/) -- CD :JOl--.c: :J III --. III :JOl--.1II .., o.:::llDc. Q.::::llDO o.a~~ ~ .....roco ......CDIll (J)(J):JCD (J)(J):J- (J)(J)::::l- N CDCDCD- ro CD CD -< CD CD ro -< 0 < < ~ ~<~Cb ~~~CD 0 -. c'i' (fl c'i' n' (fl ~ n' n' VI e: c.n (l CD CD CD CD CD m (fl (fl (fl VI VI 0 (A- ffl ffl-l -l ffl (A- ffl-f ~ w.... ffl ..... III {f) (R {f) III .1\) .->' {f) ..... III 0 ~~ 01 01C/1 -..I I\) 01 III CXlO1 W 0111 .... 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 00 0 0 ~ "T1 00 0 0.... 0 0 0_ 00 0 0.... CD 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 Q, 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 CD a r~ ffl-l -l r~ ffl-l ~ ffl .1\) III III ffl .1\) III 01'01 01 01 III III 0,0-, 01 01111 III 00 0 0 ~ ffl ~ 00 0 0 ~ '< 00 0 9 N 0 II.) 00 0 9 N C/) 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 :T 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 !i {f) (R ffl ~ -l ffl ffl ffl-l {f) ffl ffl ffl-l :::l -..1->. .1\) III I\) ...... ..... III 01->. .... .1\) III CD Olo, .... 0 III 0, '0 01C/1 :"'0-, .... 01111 i: 010 01 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 010 01 0 ~ III 00 0 9 to) 0 0 ? to) 00 0 ? to) III 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 - 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 CD ., ffl (A- ffl ffl "'0 -..I (A--..Iffl-l -I --.I (R-....Jffl-l a .w ffl ffl .->. .0 .1\) III III 5'J ffl ffl .->' .0 .1\) III co 0)->'01000111 C/I 0)......01000C/l ., III oooooo~ ffl ~ oooooo~ 3 9????9 ". 0 ". ?9??9? ". 000000 0 000000 c: 000000 0 000000 i ffl {f) {f) ffl III ..... .... ffl -l ->. ->. ffl -l I! .... .1\) ffl ffl.O.->' .1\) {f) ffl ? .->' CD III II) D:I 0101 010Ul III c.nUl c.nOUl III 00 000 ~ 00 000 ~ ffl c: 00 9?9 c.n 00 9?9 c.n 0 0.. 00 000 00 000 0 co 00 000 00 000 0 Cb .... r ffl ffl ffl fflWr-l ~ fflWr-l -l _N -ffl .w .Ul. II) .1\) -ffl .w .Ul _ III II) ...... ->. 000111 ->. .... 000111 III 00 000 ~ 00 000 ~ -ffl ~ 00 P?9 0') 00 P?9 0') 0 (l) 00 000 00 000 0 00 000 00 000 0 -ffl ffl -ffl ffl C'> ->. ->. ffl -f ...... ->'ffl-l -l Cl .1\) ffl {f).0....... III .1\) ffl {f) .0 _.... III II) :::l UlUl UlO~ III 01c.n UlOc.n1ll C/I P+ 00 00 "'" 00 000 ~ ffl ~ go 00 ?P9 -....J 00 9P9 ....,. 0 ....,. 0 00 000 00 000 0 00 000 00 000 0 ;:;: '< (A- ffl ffl fA i: ->. ......ffl-f ...... -'ffl-l -I III 5'Jffl ffl.ol"1ll .W {f) ffl?l"1ll P+ III C"l UlO1 010UlC/l 010'1 UlOO'lIll C/I ~ 00 ooo~ 00 000 ~ ffl ~ :::l 00 ??? 00 00 ??P co 0 00 00 000 00 000 0 co 00 000 00 000 0 "T1 c: :::l ffl ffl{f)ffl-l ffl (Rfflffl-f -l 0- .01 ffl .N .1\) .->' III .Ul (R .1\) .N ....... III III C/I ->. ->. 000111 ->. ->. oooC/l III 00 000 ~ 00 000 ;1(' ffl ~ 00 9P? co 00 ?PP CD 0 CD 00 000 00 000 0 00 000 00 000 0 ffl fflfflffl-l ffl -I ..... -' ffl ffl ffl -I ..f:>. ffl 1\)(0 I\) III ..f:>. {f) 1\)(01\) III III . . - III c.noo, III III Ulc.n ~g~~ O'IUl 00 00 000 ~ ~ 00 000.... 00 000.... .... 88 oobO 00 obOO 0 000 00 000 ~m ffl ffl {f) ..... ffl ->. {f) ->. {f) ffl (R ~ '" '" ~ '" ,.... g>< CXl {f) ->..j::o.. I\) l-f o {f) ..... -....J ->'I-l .<0 .m {f).W .m .w 0 .w .1\) ? .al .c.n 0 .a> _.f>. ffl.1\) .0 .aJ 0 m:J: .f:>.CXlO'l....OO-l .f:>.1\) I\)oo-l Oa>Ul<OOO-l I _ S1:!~~S1:!~~~ ~~~2~2~ 9:!QQ9:!QQ> CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 2005 TO: Land Use and T ansportation Committee VIA: David H. Manager FROM: Cary M. Roe, P , Public Works Director ~ SUBJECT: Ulldergrolllldillg Utilities Oil WSDOT Pacific Hig"way SOllt" Project POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council authorize funding for the undergrounding of overhead utilities and install street trees in the planter strip for the Pacific Highway South (WSDOT Section), S. 272nd St. to S. 284th St. project? BACKGROUND: The design for the Pacific Highway South (WSDOT Section) S. 272nd St. to S. 284th St. project started in 2001 before this area and segment of road was annexed to the City of Federal Way. As a result, this project has not in the past, nor is currently, listed on the City's Transportation Improvement Plan. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is the lead agency on this project and funding for this project is primarily provided through the nickel gas tax by the state legislature in the amount of $ I 5,000,000. As early as 2001, City of Federal Way staffrequested WSDOT to design this segment of Pacific Highway South consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and street design standards. The request was based on this segment of road being located in the city's Potential Annexation Area (PAA) and that it will abut future phases of the city's planned improvements on this corridor. Over the past four years the City and WSDOT engaged in numerous discussions regarding the design of this segment of Pacific Highway South. In January 2006, the City annexed the area, including this portion of Pacific Highway South. The design standards discussed included: roadway cross section, landscaping with specific attention to street trees in the median and planter strip, adequate u-turn radii, placement and type of street luminaires, signal interconnect and other miscellaneous design issues. Incrementally, WSDOT has agreed to incorporate many of the design elements requested. However they are not agreeable to undergrounding the overhead utilities, and landscaping including planting of street trees in the planter strip and median. WSDOT cited their reasons for not including these elements as: a lack of project budget, internal policies regarding street trees, and the 18th amendment of the Washington State Constitution which has been interpreted to prohibit the use of gas tax revenue for non-transportation uses. WSDOT did offer that they would be willing to include the undergrounding of overhead utilities and planting of street trees in the planter strip in the project using a Local Agency Agreement (LAA) if the City agreed to K:\LUTC\200S\11~07-05 Undergrounding Utilities on WSDOT Pacific Highway South Project.doc fund these elements. WSDOT also encouraged the City to make these decisions as soon as possible due to the projcct being seheduled for advertising in April of 2006. The City Manager then requested a meeting with WSDOT to further discuss the rcmaining design elemcnts. On August 25th, 2005 a meeting was held with Doug MacDonald, Secretary of Transportation, Ron Paananen, Assistant NW Region Administrator, and Tracey Eide, State Senator for the 30th District. At this meeting Doug MacDonald indicated he would review WSDOT's position on undergrounding of overhead utilities and planting of street trees. On October 31st, 2005, the City received Secretary MacDonald's decision regarding the two outstanding items rcquested by the city. In short, WSDOT did not change their previous position on undcrgrounding of overhead utilities or on street trees. (See attached letter.) Given the amount of time it took to negotiate the various design elements coupled with the relatively long timeframe to get Secretary MacDonald's final decision, the potential to include the undcrgrounding ofthc overhead utility in WSDOT's project may not be possible without affecting their scheduled advertising date of April 2006. Based upon Council direction to fund the undergrounding, staff will coordinate with WSDOT and PSE to determine if this project element can still be included in the overall project within the April 2006 time frame. Staff believes the street trees in the planter strip could be accomplished with this timeline. PROJECT COST: UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING Design (PSE, Qwest, Comcast) SIOO,OOO Year 2006 construction $550,000 Sales Tax @8.8% $57,200 10% Construction Contingency $71,500 TOTAL UNDERGROUNDING ESTIMATED COSTS $786,500 STREET TREES (PLANTER AREA ONLY) Trces Estimated Cost $80,000 Sales Tax @8.8% S7,040 TOTAL STREET TREES ESTIMATED COSTS $87,040 POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCE: The only unallocated funding source available in the 2005/2006 budgets for this project would be from the Unappropriated Transportation Capital Fund which totals $1,150,996.00. This funding source is the accumulation of saving from completed transportation projects. Utilizing this source of funding for this project will impact other capital improvement projects. Most notable would be a potential funding shortfall for Pacific Highway Phase III, matching future grant funds K:\LUTC\200S\11-07-0S Undergrounding Utilities on WSDOT Pacific Highway South Project.doc for Pacific Highway Phase IV, S.348th St. at 1st Ave. S., S.356th St. at SR99, City Center Acccss and 21 st Ave. extension at SW356,h St. OPTIONS: 1. Authorize staff to enter into a Local Agency Agreement with WSDOT to include undcrgrounding of overhead utilities and the planting of strcet trees in the planter strip area within the Pacific Highway South 2841h Street to South 272nd Street project. Also authorize staff to transfers the required fund from Unappropriated Transportation Capital Fund. 2. Authorize staff to cnter into a Local Agency Agreement with WSDOT to include undcrgrounding of overhead utilities with no street trees in the planter strip area within thc Pacific Highway South 284th Street to South 272nd Street project. Also authorize staff to transfers the required fund from Unappropriated Transportation Capital Fund. 3. Authorize staff to enter into a Local Agency Agreement with WSDOT to include planting of street trees in the planter strip area within the Pacific Highway South 284'h Street to South 272nd Street project. Also authorize staff to transfers the required fund from Unappropriated Transportation Capital Fund. 4. Do not authorize staff to enter into a Local Agency Agreement with WSDOT to include undergrounding of overhead utilities and/or street trees within the Pacific Highway South 284th Street to South 272nd Street project and provide direction to staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As this is a policy issue, staff is not making a recommendation, but rather seeks direction on how the committee would like to proceed. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward the Committce recommendation to the November 15,2005 City Council Consent Agenda :liiWIPiig!''''' lWt r1n OFCQMMITTEE REPORT: hi ~:::i" IVIiehacl Park, Member K:\LUTC\200S\11.07-0S Undergrounding Utilities on WSOOT Pacific Highway South Project.doc ...... ~~ ~II Washington State Department of Transportation ljM~ Douglas 8. MacDonald I Secretary of Transportation ( Octobcr 27, 2005 1 v.........c>....U..""'d.yUV Mr. David Moseley, City Manager City of Fcderal Way P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-971S Dear Mr. Moseley: This letter is to follow-up on our discussion regarding thc upcoming Washington Statc Department of Transportation (WSDOT) projcct on SR 99 in thc City of Fcderal Way (City). This nickcl- . funded projcct bccame more complicated when the City annexed this section of highway after it , was approved by thc Lcgislature. I was happy to hear that WSDOT project staff havc coordinated with the City and havc been able to resolvc many issues the City had with the projcct. Among thosc, we havc included the additional right-of-way for a wider sidewalk, planting strip on thc cast sidc of the highway and fiber optics for signal intcrconnection. Whcn wc met, you brought up two rcmaining issues that thc City has with the project as eurrcntly planned by WSDOT; the under-grounding of utilities and inclusion of street trees in the project. We have carefully reviewcd thc utility issue and wc have concluded that we cannot use statc gas tax funds to include this work on the projcct. Wc havc consistently (across the state) declincd to pay for under-grounding, based on court decisions restricting the usc of state gas tax funds for highway purposes only. During our mccting you suggcsted that federal funds had previously becn reeeivcd by the City of Fedcral Way for work on SR 99 that could be substituted for state gas tax funds to avoid the prohibition against using the statc gas tax for non-highway purposcs. This is not financially fcasible sincc we arc currcntfy struggling to stay within the legislatively approved project budget. Thc only way the under-grounding of utili ties can bc included is ifthc City provides thc additional funds to the project for this purpose. This is also true for the funding of the street trces requestcd by thc City. We discusscd the dcsil,'Il issucs with the Statc Design Engineer, and he has concludcd that since the City has full responsibility outsidc the curb, and has adopted street trees as a standard design clement for SR 99, it would not be considered a deviation to include them in the project. According to WSDOT's Roadside Classification Plan, WSDOT would not include trces within thc rccoverY zone defincd for this roadway as the first ten feet bcyond the curb. I undcrstand that the City has adopted a standard design for SR 99 that does include street trecs. Therefore, in accordancc thc City/State agrecment, WSDOT would include the trees in thc projcct if the City provides the funding. I rcgrct that we are unablc to comply with thesc two City requcsts. RI=GEIVEr. ~ fS~~ OCT 3 1 2005 ouglas . MacDonald CITY OF F;:CEHA~.' VAv Secretary of Transportation CIT',' MCl"~'! ...~F~'.-:-. nq:JCf: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: November ih, 2005 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: David H. MO~anage' . Rick Perez, P.E., C, Y Traffic Engineer ft/ FROM: SUBJECT: Amon Service Station Access onto SR 509 POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council support a revised access point on a state highway? BACKGROUND: At the September 20, 2005, City Council meeting, the owner of Dash Pint Arco, Joseph Amon, presented a letter describing his frustration with staff's response to his request to allow left-turn-in access from SR 509 (SW Dash Point Road. The City Council referred the issue to the Land Use and Transportation Committee. Access Management Regulations As a state highway, Dash Point Road is subject to the access management standards adopted by RCW 47.50. WSDOT standards adopted under WAC 468.52 provide more detail as to criteria. WSDOT has classified SR 509 as Access Class 4, which requires spacing of 250 feet between any intersection and/or driveway. WAC 468.51 requires cities with permit authority to adopt access management standards at least as restrictive as the state standards on state highways. The City's adopted standards meet the State standards and are contained within Division 4, Article XVI of the Zoning Code (Sections 22-1541 through 1544). Development of the Current Site Mr. John Amon developed the current site from a service station that had been vacant for an unknown number of years. Mr. Amon was informed at the pre-application meeting that since the site's access onto SR 509 did not meet the State's standard that it should be relocated as far from the intersection at SW 31th Street as possible and that it would be restricted to right-inlright-out access. A modification request was received and granted that allowed a right-in/right-out access located 220 feet from the intersection at SW 31th Street. Although this was not "as far as possible" from the intersection, it represented a compromise between access at this site and a potential access to the parcel to the north and Mr. Amon's site plan. Since that time, another service station was permitted on the northwest comer of SR 509 and SW 31ih Street, furthering the need for the existing c-curb. In addition, the existing c-curb was extended to preclude left-turn access at the southerly of two driveways into Dash Point Village Shopping Center as a condition ofthe Metropolitan Market redevelopment. Requests for Revision In 2002, Mr. John Amon requested that the existing c-curb be shortened to address a safety problem he had noted at the site. Some drivers were driving approximately 100 feet on the left side ofthe c-curb in order to turn left into his site. At that time, staff did not pursue this modification because it would have provided an incentive to allow left turn movements out of the service station across the street in a similarly illegal fashion. This last winter, Mr. Joseph Amon requested a break in the c-curb. After review of the situation, staff considered the possibility of implementing a design similar to that which was implemented on S 2881h Street east of SR 99. However, it was noted that, since SW Dash Point Road was a state highway, this would entail a Channelization Plan approval from WSDOT for revising the traffic control. (Pursuant to RCW 47.24, WSDOT must approve any revisions to channelization, which includes C-curb, on state highways.) At that time, Mr. Amon was unwilling to assume the costs associated with gaining WSDOT approval. Thereafter, staff determined that it would be most appropriate to continue to maintain the original conditions of approval for development of the site. Since that K:\LUTC\200S\11-07-0S Amon Access.doc time, Mr. Amon has expressed a willingness to consider some expenses to attain WSDOT approval of a revised channel ization plan. Me Amon also noted two other locations where similar c-curb modifications appear to have been made. Staffs response to these is as follows: S 320lh Street between SR 99 and 20th A venue S: This location predates the City's incorporation. It allows left. turns in to the driveway serving the Commons. Although it has three opposing conflicting lanes, it has a low collision rate, therefore, staff has not pursued any changes to access at this location. S 336lh Street east of SR 99: This location was the result of a developer-proposed mitigation that staff modified as a result of the outcry from affected businesses. Weyerhaeuser Credit Union developed a parcel with a "panhandle" access to S 336lh Street. This access did not meet City code, but could not be relocated due to its proximity to an existing building on the west and a wetland on the east. The developer's traffic engineer recommended the installation of C-curb as a mitigation measure, which was placed across this driveway and extended to SR 99. This impacted the small shopping center on the southeast comer ofSR99 and S 3361h Street. In response to the concerns of those business owners, staff evaluated conditions and the collision history and determined that the left-turn-in movement could continue to be permitted, although left-turn-out access should be restricted. Therefore, the gap in the c-curb was created to restore the left-turn-in access and signage was installed to prohibit the left-turn-out access. Design alternatives 1. Allow the left-turn-in to the Amon site and continue to prohibit the left-turn-out from the other service station with a second c-curb. This would reduce left-turn storage for the southbound left-turn movement at SW 312th Street and would be the most expensive alternative to implement. However, it would be the safest way to accommodate the left-turn-in movement to the Amon site. 2. Allow a gap in the existing c-curb at the Amon site driveway. This would also allow the left-turn-out of the Amon site and may encourage the left-turn-out at the other service station, crossing three lanes to do so. Although this would be least safe alternative, it would also be the least costly to implement. 3. Do not modify the c-curb, since it was a condition of the development. Implementation Alternatives Since this site access is on a state highway, WSDOT, not the City, would make the final decision as to whether to grant access. The cost of this process would vary depending on the level of data and design requested by WSDOT. For example, a full analysis for the SR 99 at S 332nd Street access cost the City $9000 for preliminary engineering. This presents alternatives as to bearing the cost of processing a Channelization Plan submittal and its implementation if approval is achieved. Alternatives are: A. The proponent, Mr. Amon, would bear these costs; B. The City would bear these costs; C. The costs would be shared in some fashion. Staff Recommendation: Authorize Alternative lA, wherein Mr. Amon would be responsible for pursuing a Channelization lllun revision from WSnOT to allow a left-turn-in movement without affecting access to other driveways. Committee Recommendation: Forward Option 1A to the November 1, 2005, City Council Consent Agenda. K:\LUTC\2005\11-07-05 Amon Access.doc . ~p /J( ~""..-.{ 1Jj 2-. .. Dash Point Arco 9)v/d; ~ #tf-:' ~' 1600S.W312ST RECE'~4frWr1 Federal Way W A .. -",>, Phone (253) 529-2475 SEP 2 3 ~05 ~. i:~'). fEDERAL WAY PUBLI ORK~...-A '0 ADMINISTRATION DIVI~","___". ~'.'-""-'_'_n_ Dear Council members. I am writing this letter in regards to Dash Point Arco Located on Dash Point 31 iTh Street and requesting for the partial removal of the C-curb, which is long over due. I approached the city approximately four or five months ago about the partial removal of the C-curb located to the west side of the business. Recently the traffic department has informed me that it would not be possible for them to remove since the C-Curb was part of my permit. It is true but I only accepted the condition because I was under the impression that accepting this condition was the only way I could get the permits to build. I think: we should look at this from a reasonable point of view. Ifpart of the C-curb were to be removed to give entry access only for traffic going southbound, what would be the affects of it? I strongly don't believe there will be any negative affects. I can't imagine how an access point would increase risk of accident. If access is allowed traffic will back up to a center lane not the main lane of traffic. If traffic backs up it will be away from the intersection. We are only requesting enter only access, so traffic leaving from the west side will not be allowed to make a left turn from this access point. Further more I don't understand why my request would be a problem when the same access has been give to shopping area on 320'" and Pacific Hwy. This access point is for traffic going west on 320tb just before Hwy 99. I am sure traffic safety issue can not be an issue for my request since access point given on 320'" and hwy 99 has higher traffic volume, traffic would have to drive over 3 lanes to enter, and if more then 4 cars are waiting to enter in shopping strip at he same time traffic would back up to the main lane of traffic. Two days ago I also realized that an access has been give on 336'" and Hwy 99. Once again the same exact request that I have made. What is different about my situation? I don't think there is anything different, accept there is much less traffic volume. Please consider the following. a) If access is allowed this will not affect traffic going southbound, since traffic will only back up in the Center lane, and there is more than enough room. b) Traffic will back up away from the intersection. c) I am only requesting an entry only access. d) I will pay for the cost of removing the C-curb. d) Tbe city bas already allowed two similar access points. One on 320'" and Hwy 99 and 336tb and Hwy 99. I thank you very much for your time and understanding. I have great confidence in your judgment and reasonability. I am certain upon your closer examination you will find it would be unreasonable not to allow this access point. I would be delight to work with you on any suggestion you may have. I am hoping you will take this matter seriously and will respond promptly. If there is any question or concerns you might have please feel free to caU me at (206) 856-4255 or contact me at the above address. Humbly & Sincerely yours Joe Amon B . ... ." " , t ".~'~' -, ,~, .. ','~.' ':'\:r:,::::,:~:(' ""': .~.,' ::'~,;," ./'.' :~"..' '::.. "....",:;. ',:\ .. ,,"." .". ,'.,_,.. ' :"1'. {-'" :. ~" '~. ,". .. --~.............''''-oao.......,.......................~_,___..'' "=':::."._-~ ",',"~ ~'...' '-'h__ ----- !B . . . 11 ,~\. . II 1: ,..i(':":.' . . . .'~ . ,. , I .. ,. . . I .. '. .. . , ... ..'. ." " .. . . - . '''-~ . ."'... --I: . :j{ " .. '....-. ~-tt. . r. ..~ Ii .. . i ';~ , ~ , . .. . "" f . . . , ... . , 1 io."4 '~':,. I . .j I , , CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM ---~ DATE: October 17, 2005 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: David H. .1 Manager FROM: Paul A. Bucich, .E, Surface Water Mana~_.", SUBJECT: Fencing ofpond at 21st Avenue SW and SW 34tjh Place POLICY QUESTION: Should Surface Water Management provide fencing for the stormwater pond at 21 sl Avenue SW and SW 349th Place due to neighborhood security issues and trash dumping? BACKGROUND: Surface Water Management and the City Council have been approached by a resident adjacent to the pond near the intersection of 21 sl Ave SW and SW 349th PI. with a request for fencing of the stormwater pond. The pond in question was built by a private developer in 1980 per the standards in place at that time. Facilities fenced during that era were primarily fenced for either excessively steep side slopes, depth of water, or aesthetics. The adjacent property owner has expressed concerns about transients utilizing the pond property for refuge. While there is no evidence of any permanent encampments it is possible there has been some temporary use by transients for such activity. As such, the property owner has requested the pond be fenced for security purposes. Current Federal Way requirements do not require fencing of ponds unless the pond side slopes exceeded 3H:1V or where the impoundment is a wall greater than 24 inches in height. The fence need only be constructed for those slopes steeper than 3H: 1 V. The intent is to discourage access to portions of a pond where steep side slopes increase the potential for slipping into the pond and to guide those who have fallen into a pond to side slopes that are flat enough (flatter than 3: 1 and unfenced) to allow for easy escape. There are two options for the height of the fence, 6' and 4', based on depth of impoundment with the shorter fence allowed for impoundments of 5' or less of water depth. For public facilities, fencing materials would be vinyl coated chain link fencing per the City's standards in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted and amended by Federal Way. The existing pond has 3H: 1 V side slopes and no walls along the pond. Further, the maximum water depth is 2.5' and the access road is the emergency spillway. Lakehaven Utility District has utility infrastructure along the frontage and within the pond area. Any fencing will need to accommodate their needs for maintenance access. The Surface Water Utility currently maintains 85 small residential ponds, 42 of which are fenced. Since inception, SWM has fenced between 5-7 ponds primarily due to a problem with trash dumping. Surface Water Management has solicited a bid from a fencing contractor to get an idea of the magnitude of costs for fencing this facility. Due to existing fencing on two sides and a portion of a third, only 143 feet offencing would be needed along with a 15' double leaf gate for access. Based on vinyl coating and a six foot height, the quote came back at $4,632.70 plus tax which equates to $5,045 total. OPTIONS: 1. Authorize Surface Water Management staff to fence the stormwater pond at 2ls1 Avenue SW and SW 3491h Place. Staff to solicit bids and accept the lowest responsive bid per City purchasing guidelines and proceed with fencing of the pond. 2. Do not authorize staff to fence the pond and provide direction to staff. K:\LlJTC\200S\10-17-0S Fencing of pond at 21st Ave SW & SW 349th PI.doc STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is seeking direction from Council on how to proceed with thc citizen request. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward Option to the Novemberlst, 2005 City Council Consent Agenda. K:\LUTC\2005\1O-17-05 Fencing of pond at 21st Ave SW & SW 349th PI. doc CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM - DATE: November 7th, 2005 TO: VIA: David H. Moseley, Ci na r FROM: Paul A. Bucich, P.E., urface Water Manager @ SUBJECT: WRIA 9 Resolution to Adopt Habitat Plan POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council adopt the WRlA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan for the GrecnlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed through resolution? BACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way has been an active member in two watershed forums, the Central Puget Sound and the GreenlDuwamish, since their conception. In 2001 the two forums were combined into one in an effort to consolidate efforts and recognize that the nearshore and mainstream river systems are intricately tied together. Federal Way agreed to this combining of efforts and recognized the benefits from participation through interagency coordination on projects: having a unified voice at the county, state and federal levels, consistency with regulations on stormwater management for quantity and quality controls, and sharing of ideas at staff and elected levels. In June of 2001, the City entered into an Inter-Local Agreement with 16 other jurisdictions in the GreenIDuwamish Watershed and the nearshore environment to develop a long term salmon conservation plan, the "Green/Ouwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan" (the Plan). This Plan has been completed and is presented here tonight for your consideration. Federal Way has been an active participant in the plan development at all levels and provided funding of activities such as the Ecosystem Restoration Study completed by the Corps of Engineers in the GreenlDuwamish Watershed as well as the Seattle directed Nearshore Environmental Assessment Study through supplemental funding outside of the ILA agreement. The results of these studies have benefited Federal Way by developing an enhanced understanding of our nearshore conditions, as well as helping to assess a need for any future projects. The Plan does not include any capital projects for Federal Way in either the GreenlDuwamish basin or the nearshore environment. It does have numerous recommendations for programs and policies that should be evaluated for suitability within Federal Way. Examples of such include a program to promote better volunteer carwash practices, as well as a program to increase public awareness about what healthy streams and rivers look like and how to enjoy recreating on them. In the first case, SWM is already conducting such a program for the City and is used as a model by other jurisdictions. In the second example, we could look at producing Or "borrowing" literature to send to property owners along the streams in Federal Way. Many of the programs are specific to the upper, middle, and lower green river segments and do not apply to Federal Way, so there IS anticipated to be a minimal work load impact to city staff. The Plan is the result of years of scientific investigations into the needs of salmonids in the watershed and along the nearshore. It is one of the most comprehensive salmon habitat plans developed in the nation and is intended to be used by all jurisdictions when evaluating goals and projects for salmon conservation efforts including habitat preservation and restoration activities. K:\LUTC\2005\11 ~07-05 WRIA Habitat Plan Adoption.doc Options: 1) Adopt the attached Resolution ratifying the Watcr Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, "Making Our Watershed Fit for a King" and direct staffto use it when evaluating goals and projects for salmon conservation efforts. 2) Do not adopt thc attached Resolution ratifying the WRIA 9 Habitat Plan and provide direction to staff. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve option J above ratifying the WRIA 9 Habitat Plan, "Making Our Watershed Fit for a King". Committee Recommendation: Forward option 1 to the Dccember 6th, 2005 City Council Business portion of the City Council meeting for final approval. K:\LUTC\2005\11-07-05 WRIA Habitat Plan Adoption.doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING THE WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA) 9 SALMON HABITAT PLAN, "MAKING OUR WATERSHED FIT FORA KING". WHEREAS, in March 1999, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries listed the Puget Soood Chinook sahnon evolutionary significant unit as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA); and WHEREAS, in November 1999, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed the Puget Sound bull trout distinct population segment as a threatened species under the ESA; and WHEREAS, significant areas of the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 (WRIA 9), are designated by the federal government as critical salmon habitat; and WHEREAS, coordination and cooperation among federal, state, and local agencies, tribes, businesses, non-governmental organizations, landowners, citizens, and other interests are essential to plan for and implement a salmon recovery plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way supports cooperation at the WRIA level to set common priorities for actions among partners, efficient use of resources and investments, and distribution of responsibility for actions and expenditures; and Res. # , Page 1 WHEREAS, 17 local govenunents in WRIA 9 entered into an inter-local agreement in 2001 to jointly fund development of the GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, "Making our Watershed Fitfora King", published August 10, 2005 attached as reference; and WHEREAS, the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, developed by a steering committee comprised of multiple interests, includes a wide variety of actions that focus on habitat recovery for Chinook salmon, bull trout, and other salmonids for the next ten years and prioritizes them to guide efforts to recover the Green River Chinook salmon population; and WHEREAS, the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan is based upon a sound scientific foundation, and includes an adaptive management approach and funding strategy for implementation; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section I. The City of Federal Way hereby ratifies the GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, "Making our Watershed Fitfor a King", dated August 2005. Sec!~on 2. This resolution does not obligate the City Council to future appropriations. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 4. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of Res. # , Page 2 this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City CounciL RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON this day of ,2005. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, DEAN McCOLGAN ATTEST: CITY CLERK, APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON Res. # , Page 3 FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: Revised: 1/9/05 Res. # , Page 4 <F~"- ~~'i,;i.',,: ~~'i' - ." . ..~/t.~~ ..,~ ~ i~~," -~~ co' ;$'" -.;: 1.1 INTRODUCTION The story of salmon in Puget Sound is one told in rivers. streams, and the marine waters of Puget Sound. GreenlDllwamish and Central That story of migration, spawning, gro\\1h. PllgetSolllld I abundance. and decline is a common one, Watershed (l1lRIA 9) at a Glance I experienced by all of the watersheds in the Puget Sound region, including the Green! Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed (Figure 1- I). I But the future of this story is in jeopardy. Will people a I century hence view the salmon as a living icon of their I watersheds? Or will it be a historical symbol of a I bygone era that can only be viewed in the wild by I traveling to Canada or Alaska? Will future stories ., acknowledge the wisdom and effort of our generation, I which saw problems and boldly solved them? Or will N I our descendents shake their heads at our lack of " , '" .- 1 I understanding and commitment that left them an .'" impoverished watershed that functioned poorly for both people and fish? ! Human population: No less important is the fact that the present decline in 630,329 (2004 est.) watershed health that harms salmon also jeopardizes other goods and services that the watershed provides Chinook salmon population: I its many human residents at low or no cost: clean, 2,450 to 11,500 adults per year abundant water, locally-grown foods, forest products, (highly variable) flood protection, recreational opportunities, and great , natural beauty. Will we take action to conserve a Appraised land value: resource that benefits us daily in many ways? $27.6 billion f We who share this watershed have an opportunity to Improvements value: shape the answers to these questions as we decide $43.9 billion whether and how to implement the recommendations of this Salmon Habitat Plan. Square miles: 664 total (575 land area) After 120 years of intense development, the strains on .l fish and the ecosystem of the Green!Duwamish and River miles (mainstem): Central Puget Sound Watershed began to be apparent 93 to many. We ask much from our watershed. The j ecosystem goods and services it provides include water Puget Sound shoreline miles: for drinking and industrial purposes, food, forest 90 products, waste assimilation. numerous recreational opportunities, and floodwater retention. For many Value of ecological goods and services per years. it provided a wealth of salmon, too. As more of year (waste assimilation, recreation, Dood these goods and services have been demanded than reduction, etc.): I can be sustainably renewed, watershed health has $1. 7 billion to $6.3 billion per year suffered. In response to these stresses and changes in (depending on assumptions) ~ national, state, and local priorities over the last three decades, we have begun to take better care of the watershed and its ecosystem. [ I Page 7 . GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 1005 I farm, forest lands, parks, and natural areas that make up much of the watershed. Improvements in growth management and stormwater practices helped reduce the impacts ofthe rapid population growth and development in the last decade ofthe 20th century. The federal government listing of Chinook salmon and bull trout as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) accelerated the change in perspec- tive and a greater motivation for action. The Green/ Duwamish summer/fall Chinook and Newaukum Creek summer/fall stocks are included in the Puget Sound Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) for Chi- I nook. This ESU was listed as "threatened" under the ESA in 1999. In response to these federal listings, the WRlA 9 (Water Resource Inventory Area) Forum of Local Governments helped fund the creation of this Salmon Habitat Plan ("Plan") to guide protection and restoration of Chinook salmon and bull trout in the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed. The Forum includes all the local governments -15 cities and King County- in the watershed. The City ofTacoma also is a partner because of the importance of the Green River for its People and fish ore never for oport in the watershed, os shown here in municipal water supply. Auburn at river mile 30 on the Green River. July 1004 photo. This Habitat Plan recommends actions that should be taken over the next 10 years to protect and restore Stewardship of the watershed is evolving. For over a salmon habitat, using an ecosystem approach, in the century following European settlement, the watershed GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed. was a bank from which resources could be drawn These efforts will complement habitat improvements seemingly endlessly. The GreenlDuwamish and in other parts of Puget Sound and changes to hatchery Central Puget Sound Watershed offered a bounty of and harvest practices and thereby contribute to the drinking water, fish. forest products, farm products, recovery of Puget Sound Chinook salmon and bull and minerals. Later. it became a center for commerce trout. and industry in Western Washington and the water- Even within the watershed, this Salmon Habitat Plan is shed became a sink into which wastes could be poured with apparently few consequences. In the 1960s, a piece of a larger picture. Many individuals, non-profit environmental protection efforts began to address groups, businesses, and governments have worked some of the consequences of these patterns of use. hard to protect and improve ecosystem health and Initial efforts focused on specific, obvious problems salmon habitat for years, Some have made long-term such as point source water pollution from factories. commitments that will contribute greatly to watershed Recent recognition of the ecological importance of the salmon recovery. entire watershed has resulted in a broader apprecia- This Plan recommends a comprehensive approach to tion of the environmental health and ecological integrity of the watershed. Beginning in the 1980s, protect and restore salmon habitat in the Green/ people in the watershed began to seek to reduce on- Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed. It going sources of harm, protect remaining healthy provides a strategy to accelerate salmon habitat habitats, and restore degraded areas. During the 1990s, recovery locally and recommends specific and achiev- a wide variety of private and public land owners and able projects, programs, and policies that can be managers committed to being better stewards of the implemented within the first 10 years following plan adoption. The Plan relies on an ecosystem approach Page 2 GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 2005 with a focus on the needs of Chinook salmon. Many if 1.2 WHY DO WE NEED A WATERSHED not most of its recommendations also will benefit bull SALMON HABITAT PLAN? trout (also listed as "threatened) and other non-listed species such as coho salmon and steelhead trout. Native-origin Chinook salmon in the Green' Watershed ecosystem health and salmon recovery is a Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed could become extinct within our lifetimes. long- term task that will take decades and may last as long as a century. While this Plan focuses on actions in In response to this possibility, the National Marine the next 10 years, it provides tools that can be used in Fisheries Service (now known as NOM Fisheries) the future to develop and evaluate actions. Its adaptive listed Puget Sound Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus management program, moreover, will provide valuable tshawytscha) as a threatened species under the ESA in information to further refine and target additional March 1999. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed actions. This Plan has a practical, 10-yearfocus for bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) as a threatened most actions complemented by a long-term vision and species in November 1999. enduring tools for further work. These actions and vision, as well as other interesting facts about the Approximately 106 wild salmon stocks in the Pacific watershed, are depicted in the WRIA 9 poster, "Making Northwest are now extinct, 214 are at high or our Watershed Fit for a King." moderate risk of extinction, and others being reviewed Although the recommendations of this Habitat Plan for listing under the Endangered Species Act. are based on the best collective judgment of its many The causes of decline attributable to human activities authors, new information in the future should be used include: to refine and modify these recommendations. To be . Hydropower operations; most effective. this Plan should be considered a "living document." What this means is that when someone . Fishing (harvest); picks up a copy in 2015, they'll find dog-eared pages, . Poor hatchery practices; and implementation notes jotted alongside project de- . Degradation of habitat through land use and scriptions, inserted summaries of new scientific water-use practices. information, new project ideas on post-its, project construction and ribbon-cutting photos inserted between pages, references to monitoring reports for completed projects, and, assuredly, a dust-free cover. The Plan before you is the product of ever-greater voluntary cooperation in assessing, planning for, and acting to meet salmon habitat needs across the water- shed. Local governments, federal and state agencies, business and environmental interests, private property owners, volunteers, and interested citizens have demonstrated enormous dedication and public spiritedness. They are essential participants in this long, increasingly fruitful endeavor. Good stewardship of the watershed and its salmon populations in the --~:.;~~~,- ':::.~~;:; years ahead will surely rely on continued cooperation - ~ and shared responsibility. Th. Green RiveT is the primary source of drinking water for the City of Tacoma and many ofituuburbs. Water is diverted alth. Tacoma Headworlrs at river mile 61. July 1004 photo. Page 3 GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Solmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 2005 In addition, climatic and ocean changes are respon- Healthy watersheds provide many of these services for sible for natural variability that provides a background free and in perpetuity and others at low cost. As our of change. Predation of salmon by mammals, birds, watershed is degraded, we lose these services or have and other fish during different life history stages also to pay more to create substitutes (e.g., stormwater has an impact on salmon populations. systems to manage runoff exacerbated by large amounts of pavement). Investments in ecosystem Although the relative impact of these factors varies health to benefit salmon and bull trout also will yield among watersheds, habitat loss and degradation are benefits for people. Alternatively, failure to act to considered contributing factors in the decline of most protect and restore the watershed - which may cause salmonid1populations (Spence et al.1996). the loss of wild Chinook salmon- will cost us in other ways as well. Although many people are working today to help salmon in our watershed, more work is needed to arrest the decline ofthese fish and restore the health of the ecosystem that sustains them. This Habitat Plan 1.3 WHAT DO SALMON NEED? builds on existing work and takes advantage of the latest scientific understanding to chart a course for The needs of salmon are few and straightforward. They habitat improvements over the next 10 years and need: provides tools and information for the years beyond. . Cool, unpolluted water; The watershed Habitat plan relies on local knowledge . Spawning gravels that are not scoured out by high and dedication to identify and solve problems in our flows or covered up with deposits of fine sediment; watershed. It is part of the commitment across Puget . Accessible freshwater habitats- side channels, off- Sound to develop a bottom-up recovery plan that will channel marshes and sloughs, and shallow water meet the requirements of the Endangered Species Act areas - that provide food, shelter from predators, while being informed by the knowledge and values of and refuge from high stream flows; our communities. This Puget Sound-wide plan - the . Nearshore marine habitats that provide food, Shared Strategy- will be the venue for integrating shelter, and migration corridors to and from the habitat solutions for this watershed with other habitat efforts and efforts to address hatchery, harvest, and Pacific Ocean; and hydropower impacts. . An opportunity to return to their natal streams at the time they are ready to spawn. There is another compelling reason for marshalling the Long-term salmon recovery depends on: resources and energy to implement this Habitat Plan: the health of the watershed. The GreenlDuwamish and . Protecting existing high quality habitat; Central Puget Sound Watershed sustains a human . Protecting and improving water quality and popujation of 630,000 people with goods and services ensuring adequate streamflows; worth billions of dollars. . Restoring rivers, streams, estuaries, and nearshore Just a few of these include: habitats that have been degraded, guided by an . Domestic water supply; understanding of population needs, current habitat conditions, and the salmon-producing . Produce and other farm products; capacity of streams, rivers, and the marine . Forest products; nearshore; . Mitigation of floods and droughts; . Maximizing access to suitable habitats in the . Detoxification and decomposition of wastes; watershed; . Recreational opportunities; and . Reforming hatcheries so their management supports viable salmonid populations; and . Aesthetic beauty. . Managing harvest to ensure adequate escapement of wild-spawning fish. 1. Salmonids include salmon, trout, and chars (including bull trout) from the Family Salmonidae. Page 4 Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Solmon Habitat Pion Executive Summary-August 2005 ~FR~ ~ EGGS IN GRAVEL ~ Female salmon lay 2.000 -..<(~~ - _--.to 4,000 eggs in clean, ALEVlN ~ . ~';:' well-oxyg~nated gravel. .- In about 50 days, the baby salmon hatch, but they stay in the gravel, getting food from a yolk sac still attached to their bodies. The Salmon Cycle . ~~- -S;A;N~~ ~".? , SM~ King salmon change color as they After 2 to 16 months, these young_ sWim upstream to the exact same salmon start their loog journey to - ___stream where they were hatched. After spawning, the salmon die. the sea. Their kidneys and gills change ADULT KING (CHINOOK) SALMON Their bodies provide food for animals to prepare them for life in salt water, and ....aluable nutrients to the streams, and they turn silver to camouflage Salmon spend about 4 years in Puget Sound themselves in the ocean, 0( in the ocean where they feed and grow. 1.4 WHAT IS OUR GOAL AND For context, the current target number for spawning WHERE ARE WE NOW? adult summer/fall Chinook for the GreenlDuwamish River watershed is approximately 9,300 Chinook. Of The following long-term (50- to 100-year) population this number, 5,800 fish are targeted to spawn in the targets for summer/fall Chinook salmon in WRIA 9 are: river ("escapement"), and 3.500 adult fall Chinook are . 17,000 spawning adults annually (lower limit); intended for broodstock. Broodstock are artificially spawned at the So os Creek Salmon Hatchery. . 27,000 spawning adults (midpoint and adopted target); and The number of returning fall Chinook to the Green . 37,000 spawning adults (upper limit). River varies tremendously year to year. From 1989 to 2001, total returning fall Chinook naturally spawning Refinement of these targets is expected to occur as in the river ranged from 2,450 to 11,500. Summer/fall additional analyses are completed. These targets have Chinook returning to the hatchery have exceeded been accepted by the Puget Sound Technical Recovery 9,000 adults every year since 1995, except for 2000, Team (TRT) and by the Washington State Department when approximately 6,000 returned. offish and Wildlife (see January 25. 2005 letter in In addition to the numerical target focused on abun- AppendixA). dance, the recommendations of the Habitat Plan are intended to improve the three other viable salmonid population parameters by: . Increasing productivity (growth rate) of the population; . Improving diversity in terms of genetic makeup and behavioral traits; and . Improving the spatial structure of the population to better distribute fish to take advantage of good habitat and to lower risk from catastrophic events. Portions of the Middle Green River, shown here ot ri.er mile 39, pro.ide good spawning and rearing habitat. Page 5 Green/Duwamlsh and Central Puget Sound Watershed Solmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 2005 1.5 WHAT HISTORY DOES THE PLAN Hundreds of acres of high-quality habitat have been BUILD ON? preserved through public purchase and innovative incentive programs. Growth management has focused This Habitat Plan is the result of a five-year planning development in the existing urban areas, helping to effort supported by the WRlA 9 Steering Committee keep rural areas rural for the benefit of rural residents and Forum. The Steering Committee is a cooperative and fish. Meanwhile, countless private landowners effort with members representing the variety of quietly go to the expense and effort of managing their perspectives found in the basin, including govern- land to preserve its habitat value. Finally, thousands of volunteers have donated their labor to plant native ment, business, recreation, agriculture. the environ- trees and shrubs and control invasive weeds. ment, and others. The Forum is theWRlAdecision-. making body composed of the 16 local governments in Chapter 2, Introduction, provides a brief description of the WRIA 9 watershed plus Tacoma Public Utilities. these and other efforts. A more complete summary is Although the Habitat Plan is focused on future steps, it in the 2002 Near-Term Action Agenda (along with two annual follow-up progress reports), which was devel- is important to acknowledge the dedication and oped as an interim predecessor to this Habitat Plan. successes to date in this watershed. Despite being intensively developed, this watershed The many accomplishments to date are a foundation still retains a natural ecosystem worth saving and for the hope that the ambitious recommendations of improving. It also is reaping the fruits of the millions of this Habitat Plan are accomplished. dollars and thousands of hours devoted to salmon habitat and ecosystem health in recent years. These commitments range from local grants from the local 1.6 WHAT IS THE SCIENTIFIC King Conservation District to over $7.3 million in FOUNDATION FOR THE HABITAT PLAN? federal and state funds from the Salmon Recovery Funding Board. A partnership between the U.S. Army The recommendations of this Plan rest on a strong Corps of Engineers, Indian tribes, and local govern- foundation of scientific assessment and analysis. A ments has begun to implement a suite of projects in summary of the current scientific understanding of the the Green/Duwamish Watershed portion ofWRlA 9. An watershed is provided in Chapter 4. Scientific Founda- extensive array of farm management practices and tion, and Chapter 5, Habitat Management Strategies. other land use policies, regulations, and programs that are implemented by allloca1 governments also im- This understanding is based on years of study of the prove conditions for fish while preserving sustainable watershed that culminated in a Strategic Assessment agriculture and urban and rural residential areas. For during 2002-2004 (King County Department of Natural example, the development rights for over 13,000 acres Resources and Parks et al. 2004). This Strategic Assess- (county-wide) have been acquired through the Farm- ment consists of original research to fill in gaps in land Preservation Program and are therefore protected understanding identified by previous work. It also from development. Improved stormwater manage- includes analysis that helped make sense of a tremen- ment by cities large and small is contributing to dous amount of technical information and began the . reduced impacts on streams from development. process of translating science into policy. \ii,;,;~~:f;f ,",:\;<f~sr?~ The scientific work in the Strategic Assessment was ,"j"'-.T.mAd:lonA~ guided by the: " IofSlllmonH.blt.eor-mbll "k._f',.. .:.:.:;"..:::-1;~;-/":'-c ~ Much of the work done to improve the wotershed 1) Viable Salmonid Population (VSP) framework ecosystem is listed in the 1001 (McElhany et al. 2000); WRIA 9 Near- Term Action Agendo Habitat Plan Substantive Scope and Approach, ond two subsequent annuol 2) progress reports. approved by the Steering Committee in 2002; and 3) Technical guidance document developed by the Puget Sound Technical RecoveryTeam (2003) for integrated salmonid habitat recovery planning. Page 6 GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 2005 As the scientific foundation for the Habitat Plan, the These scientific products - information on conditions, Strategic Assessment includes information on: conservation hypotheses, necessary future conditions, and habitat management strategies - have been . Historical and current habitat conditions; essential tools in identifying, refining, reviewing, and . Salmonid population conditions; revising the actions recommended in this Plan. They . Fish utilization, including juvenile migration and constitute a logic train (Figure 4-3) that link present rearing patterns, habitat usage, and habitat scientific understanding to recommended future limiting factors; and actions. . Water quantity and quality. The WRlA 9 Habitat Limiting Factors and Reconnais- 1.7 WHAT IS THE STRATEGY sance Assessment Report (Kerwin and Nelson (Eds.) FOR HABITAT RECOVERY? 2000) and the State of the Nearshore Ecosystem Report (Brennan (Ed.) 2001) were used as raw material for The results of the Strategic Assessment have made I further analysis as part of the Strategic Assessment. possible the identification of clear priorities for work The Strategic Assessment analysis included examining over the next 10 years. the functional linkages between habitat conditions Scientific assessments - summarized in the WRlA 9 and populations and developing conservation hypoth- Habitat Limiting Factors and Reconnaissance Assess- eses. Conservation hypotheses are a "best estimate" of ment (Kerwin and Nelson (Eds.) 2000) and WRlA 9 how improvements in habitat conditions and pro- Strategic Assessment (2002-early 2005) - indicate that cesses will lead to improvements in the four viable there are limiting habitats in the Duwamish Estuary salmon parameters (abundance, productivity, diver- transition zone; Middle Green, Lower Green, sity, and spatial structure) that are critical to long-term Duwamish Estuary, and Marine Nearshore survival. The Strategic Assessment also identified Subwatershed rearing habitats; and Middle Green and necessary future conditions to support a viable popu- upper Lower Green Subwatersheds spawning habitat. lation of Chinook salmon. The necessary future It also appears that a decline in productivity of the conditions are also essentially hypotheses about what juvenile life stage undermines the viability of the is thought to be necessary habitat to recover the population (King County Departtnent of Natural Green/Duwamish River Chinook population. The Resources and Parks et al. 2004). conservation hypotheses and necessary future condi- tions were ultimately used to develop habitat manage- Based on this understanding, this Habitat Plan adopts ment strategies for each subwatershed (the watershed the following as a 10-year strategy (cited as Policy MSl is divided into five subwatersheds [Figure l-IJ for in Chapter 5, Habitat Management Strategies and analytical purposes). Policies): I The focus of management action (projects and pro- I grams) implementation efforts in this Habitat Plan will be on the following limiting habitats that exist within the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed: . Duwamish Estuary transition habitat; . Middle Green River, Lower Green River, Duwamish Estuary, and Marine Nearshore rearing habitat; and . Middle Green and Lower Green River spawning habitat. Yeors of scientific assessment have yielded valuable understanding about how the marine neorshore, estuorine, ond freshwater hobitots of the watershed meet salmonid needs. This neorshore beach seining on Voshonl Maury helped determine solmonid presence. Moy 1001 photo. Page 7 Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 2005 - - 11'01(,'1:. .l'i:l:l;i! "'~l~' . FIGURE 1-1 . h and Central ~ Green/Duwamls shed (WRIA 9) . =-....;,.:.:11,. ...'.. . t Sound Water Puge ) j "" "- "" '" ... Vl % ;.. Middle Green River Subwatershed ) >~"--/ " , \ "'~ .'~ c -. , River Mile ., '-., 1. hed Boundary Mile at Subwaters I. River (Woshlngton 'Catalog 0 '175) ~ River Wffl!!Stlmotedfrom. Jl/jornsrtQ( I .. River miles Sa/hon Utilization. (\oV ~ Major Road N Streomsond . due.db,,: .I Resourctl'ndParils August 2005 Mllppro t DepaftnentofNiltur Web Unit 9 .. Summary th Area Line King Coon Y d 'M..Rnsual Comm.& Page b 'tat Plan ExecutIVe ..... Urban Grow DNAPGlSan 5 ImonHa , Fill: bLoqlPRE Sound Watershed a ...... h d Boundary 6 Ma,u OS08_W9Ha _ . h nd Centra' Puget A 9 Subwaters e , I D am's a , , Green!: uw ______ WRI a . __ WRIA 9 Boundary . August 2005 I r ~= 'I Open Wate Page 8 . Plan Executive Summary h d Salmon HabItat Sound Waters e h and Central Puget Green!Duwamls 1.8 WHAT ARE THE KEY SALMON 1 ~ HABITAT NEEDS IN EACH SUBWATERSHED? I Based on the findings of the Strategic Assessment, the I i Habitat Plan focuses on actions and policies that j address the following key salmon habitat needs: Watershed-Wide Needs i I . Prevent and reduce armoring of stream banks and shorelines; . Promote low impact development such as porous pavement. bioswales, and clustered development; ! Transition lone habitat shown here at the Homm Creek confluence with . Replace culverts that block fish passage on tribu- 1 the Ouwomish at river mile 5.0, is criticol for Chinook juveniles. July 1002 tary streams; , photo. . Protect and improve water quality by focusing on "nonpoint" pollution that comes from storm water runoff from streets, highways, parking lots, roofs, Because of the importance of the Duwamish transition yards, and cleared lands; zone - where young salmonids make the transition . Allow natural river flows in an unconstrained river i from being freshwater fish to saltwater fish - and the channel where possible; and negative effect on habitat recovery efforts upstream if a . Maintain adequate stream flows. severe transition zone restriction does exist, 40% of funding for projects and programs will be focused on Upper Green River Subwatershed the transition zone. The remaining 60% of funding for projects and programs will be split between rearing . Facilitate Chinook salmon and bull trout access , and spawning limiting habitats. For example. if $100 above Howard Hanson Dam and the Tacoma million became available to implement this Plan, $40 Headworks by providing passage upstream for million would be targeted toward rehabilitation of and adults and downstream for the young fish; increases to transition zone habitat. $60 million would be targeted toward high priority projects that protect, , restore, rehabilitate, or substitute for rearing and I spawning habitat. The focus of habitat efforts in these areas will be on I increasing the productivity of the population by I improving the quality and quantity of habitats identi- fied above. . , " i This strategy is based on current understandings of .'.' .",.""",/": ';,f,/','j"'" ',-c.."'i"'"Jf' '"" '.'" 1 how the watershed meets and does not meet the . At river mile 61, the Tacom'a Diversion ~ ~ Dam diverts wate'rto s'~rve'customef's in I habitat needs of Chinook salmon. Additional informa- -'~;;""::,,,-,,":;-"""'~_"""'::""""':'i,""',", "",'::r. . Pierce and south,,,n King Counl}i.,Thiee,u' ., 1 tion and analysis may lead to changes in how re- --',-, ::-.."".:, ""~",:,::.",,, .:<, -:' ''" ;.miles upstre'am, Howard Himson Dam holds sources are allocated. ";' '" ' ,', 'Vl;- , ':"-'^~',' _".j- ,',', ,',',,' back floodwaters and, stores'water lor late . ~ :,;,~~~m~rJ~I~_~&~. B~~tfd~T~{9J~~k",~Jf\'P" , ,upstream fish passage but beginning In', , '-h " ' ",,' ,:.' ,"' "-,: ,''.;i,'''''':, ,,:'- '+ 2007, adult salmon migrating upstream'will'~ . ';;r,:' 'j',';:','" .".,,': ''h., ", 'i, '",' ,~,"'_:::;.' -, , . '';&< ,:';: ' . ','; .. be collected at the TaComa Diversion pam.." ,~ N, ' ",' -:-->- " >,-, -or',"" The fi~h will be releasedi~to tj1e Upper J Green Rivedo"s'pa~n, open,in'gup the, upp~r~ ~,'_~' """ " , ,J, ;;-'1' ", ""','" "".,^,:~, :'c, ,,/",_ :;:w watershed to salmon lorthe,,~r~t time s~ce~ 1911. ::; ;;.: :0;, .''',~, ~.~' i!kt.!'!f( _,' ~ Page 10 Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 1005 Proposed fish passage tower Duwamish Estuary Subwatershed ".' . Restore vegetated shallow subtidal and intertidal Howard Hanson Dam was not designed for safe downstream passage by young habitats and brackish marshes by restoring salmon. A new fish 'passaget!Jwer will dredged, armored, and filled areas; ~gather young salmon and pass them safely around Howard Hanson Dam. The . Increase shallow water and slow water "transition towerean pass tish regardless of zone" habitat where salmon transform from fluct~ating wat~r levels ,in the reservoir. freshwater to salt water fish; ~ ' ',_l'l";-i. . Improve sediment quality through the Lower 'l'. Duwamish Waterway Superfund cleanup; . Protect and restore water quality through point and non point pollution source control; - . Restore off-channel refuge habitat and mainstem . pools in Tukwila; and . Protect and restore riparian habitat along the . Improve natural sediment transport and deposi- Upper Green River mainstem and major tributar- tion processes. ies by restoring the riparian corridor, increasing Marine Nearshore Subwatershed channel complexity, and decommissioning old logging roads; . Protect and restore lagoons, spits, and pocket . Remove fish passage barriers such as culverts from estuaries where small streams enter Puget Sound; tributary streams; and . Protect and expand vegetated shallow water . Protect and restore natural sediment movement "nearshore" and marsh habitats; by reducing road failures. . Protect feeder bluffs that provide sediment needed for beach nourishment by preventing and, Middle Green River Subwatershed where possible, removing bulkheads; . Protect and restore side channels, off-channel . Protect and expand forage fish spawning beaches wetlands, tributary mouths, and pools that used by herring. sand lance, and surf smelt; and provide shelter and habitat complexity for young . Improve sediment quality, particularly in Elliott salmon; Bay. . Protect and restore natural sediment movement by reconnecting sediment sources to the river; . Protect and restore spawning and rearing habitat in lower Newaukum and Soos Creeks; and . Maintain regional groundwater recharge and base flows to the mainstem Green River through forest retention and low impact development. ,- . Lower Green River Subwatershed ~ . Protect and restore side channels, off. channel wetlands, tributary mouths, and pools that provide shelter and habitat complexity for young salmon; . Protect and restore natural sediment movement by reconnecting sediment sources to the river; The Hobitat Plan colis for the creation of off-chonnel, shollow-woter . Preserve groundwater inflow from the historical habitats like the Codigo project in Tukwila. Moy 1004 photo courtesy of White River channel; and City ofTukwila. . Modify the Black River Pump Station to improve fish passage. Poge 7 7 Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 2005 1.9 WHAT ACTIONS DOES THE HABITAT o Rehabilitate damaged processes and habitats that PLAN RECOMMEND TO PROTECT AND can be sustained with on-going efforts; and RESTORE SALMON HABITAT? o Substitute processes and habitats that are lost. Chapter 7. Proposed Actions and Policies to Achieve a In the first 10 years, the Plan recommends: Viable Salmonid Population, lists the most important o 75 on-the-ground restoration projects; projects and programs to implement over the next 10 years to improve the aquatic ecosystem, thereby o 57 habitat protection projects (including 50 benefiting Chinook salmon, bull trout, and other habitat protection areas on Vashon/Maury Island salmonids. Of these projects, those that address the and seven King County-proposed "Last Best Places limiting habitats for the GreenlDuwamish River Middle Green" acquisitions); and Chinook population are considered of greatest priority o 30 programs (16 watershed-wide and 14 and are listed in Table 8-2 (Chapter 8). subwatershed). Actions in this Habitat Plan can be divided into two categories: Programs: A body of work requiring staffing andl or funding. In this Plan, programs focus on stormwater management, stewardship/public education, internal government practices, and other governmental and non-governmental efforts. Projects: On-the-ground actions to protect, restore, rehabilitate, or substitute habitat or the processes that create habitat. The Plan recommends an array of projects and pro- grams that watershed partners can strive to carry out over the next 10 years. These actions will: Even more opportunities for citizen stewardship, such as shown here at the o Protect existing processes and habitats that are joint City of Auburn-King County Fenster project, will occur under the working well; Hobitat Plan. October 1004 photo. o Restore processes and habitats that can be re- 56 of the 75 on-the-ground habitat projects are consid- turned to good conditions; ered the highest priority because of their importance in addressing habitat limiting factors affecting Chi- . nook salmon (Table 8-2). These recommended actions were identified and evaluated by people who understand the watershed. Each project had to pass both a scientific/technical review and a feasibility review to be included in this Plan. As with many recommendations in this Plan. it is expected that these projects will be refined in the years to come as ever more scientific information becomes available. Projects are on-the-ground efforts that move earth and plant trees, including: o Excavating shallow water habitat in estuarine and marine nearshore habitats; Page 12 Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 2005 . Use of BuiltGreenTM and other low impact devel- opment practices by developers; . Habitat restoration projects organized by non. profit organizations and carried out by thousands of volunteers; . Improved stormwater management by local governments; ;~~ Bulkheads . Sound land use planning and growth manage- Cutoff ment by local governments; sediment .: ~ . Fish passage facility construction and operation to .."" ~~d' the Upper Green River Subwatershed by the U.S. . - "If;' -," _ro m9 " . ,',beach Army Corps of Engineers and the Tacoma Public "'!'II 4. - - .if ,. .,. Utilities; and '~c" Salmon habitat . Many other innovative, sustained efforts by . -.,.. --._ "-..... I ~F, _"'-""->_. _... ,. '";':..,.,.,~ individuals, groups, businesses, and governments intended to improve water quality and protect and . Installation of large woody debris in freshwater restore salmon habitat. habitats; . Planting of native vegetation in both marine and Finally, the Plan includes policies that provide high. freshwater habitats; level guidance to activities that directly or indirectly affect salmon habitat. . Control of noxious and invasive weeds throughout the watershed; . Levee setbacks on the Green River mainstem; . Introduction of spawning gravel in the Green River mainstem; . Side channel reconnection in freshwater habitats; and . Removal of bulkheads or replacement with softer forms of shoreline protection in marine nearshore habitats. Complementing these restorationlrehabilitation/ substitution projects are projects to protect high value habitat. Depending on the habitat value, location (e.g., next to a migrating channel), and interest of the landowner, these projects will make use of property . acquisition, conservation easements, incentives, and/ or information and education. . The recommended projects in this Plan will comple- ment on-going and planned habitat activities such as: . Good stewardship of streams, shorelines, and uplands by homeowners; . Implementing farm plans and other conservation measures by farmers; . Sustainable forestry practices by small woodlot These Auburn high school students improved hobitot by plonting trees at Whitney Bridge Pork at river mile 40.3 on the Green River. October 1004 owners; photo. Page 13 Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 2005 1.10 HOW MUCH WILL IMPLEMENTATION 1.11 HOW ARE HARVEST AND HATCHERY COST AND WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS? CONSIDERATIONS ADDRESSED? Implementation of the priority projects (Table 8-2) Effective and efficient recovery of Puget Sound Chi- recommended by this Habitat Plan are estimated to nook populations depends on addressing the causes of cost from $198 million to $291 million.lmplementa- salmonid decline including: tion of all projects recommended by this Plan would . Habitat degradation; cost from $272 to $389 million. Cost estimates for the policies and programs were not developed. . Hatchery practices; and . Harvest management. Chapter 8 of this Plan provides a strategy for imple- menting this Plan's recommendations, including The Habitat Plan currently does not address hatchery funding scenarios. Additionally, there is a Puget and harvest practices because these are the responsi- Sound-wide effort being undertaken by Shared Strat- bilityofthe co-managers (Treaty Tribes and the egy to develop a finance plan for implementing the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife). As Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan. Preliminary of mid-2005, the WRIA 9 partners were informed that approaches ofthe Puget Sound-wide effort include a the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife mix of federal, state, and local funding sources to pay had committed to lead the effort to complete the for implementation. integration of habitat, hatchery, and harvest recovery efforts at both the watershed level and at the Puget The expenditure of these substantial sums, fortunately, Sound regional level. will benefit far more than the silver fish. WRlA 9 ecosystems produce $1.7-6.3 billion of value in goods Following this so-called "H-integration" effort, it may and services every year for individuals, communities, be necessary to review elements of this Plan to deter- businesses, and governments within WRlA 9. The value mine whether and how decisions made regarding of salmon restoration and healthy ecosystems to future hatchery and harvest practices affect the habitat- generations is likely to be even greater as the popula- focused recommendations of this Plan. tion grows and the amount of habitat is reduced (Asia- Pacific Environmental Exchange 2005). Expenditures on the recommendations ofthe Habitat Plan will help 1.12 DOES THE HABITAT PLAN ALSO secure the current stream of goods and services and may increase their value. BENEFIT BULL TROUT AND OTHER SPECIES? In addition to addressing the habitat needs of Chinook, this Habitat Plan will also provide habitat improve- ments for bull trout, listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as threatened in November 1999. The ecosys- tem approach - with a focus on habitats and the processes that create those habitats - is intended to benefit all salmonid species. Very little is known about bull trout presence and use of habitats in WRIA 9 but Appendix K of Volume 11 provides a matrix showing how the recommendations in this Plan address the bull trout recovery actions listed in the Draft Recovery Plan for the Coastal- Puget Sound District Population Segment of Bull Trout (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2005). Page 14 GreenlDuwamlsh and Central Puyet Sound Watershed Sotmon Habitat Plan Executive Summary-August 2aoS 1.13 HOW Will MONITORING AND 1.14WHAT ISTHE ROLE OF CITIZENS? ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT BE USEDTO GUIDE HABITAT RECOVERY? Although the bulk of the recommendations in this Habitat Plan are likely to be carried out through a Successful implementation of the Habitat Plan actions partnership of governments, the long-term health of depends on monitoring and adaptive management. the watershed in terms important to both people and fish will be influenced greatly by those who call it Monitoring of projects will occur at multiple levels. home. Implementation monitoring will tell us which projects have been carried out. Effectiveness monitoring will In daily life, we who share this watershed have an determine whether the habitat objectives of the project impact on its health. Daily practices in the home, in have been achieved. Finally, validation monitoring will the yard, and with our cars are magnified by our . confirm whether the actions of this Plan are achieving numbers and concentrated by water. Every volunteer the desired changes in the population parameters of who picks up a shovel to control invasive weeds or abundance, productivity, diversity, and spatial struc- plant native trees is acting for a better watershed. ture. Worthwhile monitoring is in turn informed at the outset by adaptive management. Ultimately a healthy watershed depends on the actions of all of us in our roles as consumers, business people; Adaptive management is a systematic process for students. members of myriad organizations, and continually improving management policies and citizens in a community. practices by learning from the outcomes of actions. Adaptive management embodies a simple imperative: Consequently, this Plan recommends policies and policies are experiments -learn from them. Adaptive programs to promote ever greater understanding and management recognizes that uncertainty and unex. action by all of us. You can start today by visiting the pected changes are inherent in managing complex watershed website - http://dnr.metrokq!Ov/Wrias/9/ ecological systems. Adaptive management relies on a index.htm - which contains abundant tips and links problem-solving approach to address this uncertainty for salmon-friendly living. through six steps: (1) assessment, (2) design, (3) implementation, (4) monitoring. (5) evaluation, and (6) adjustment. The actions recommended in this Plan and the success of salmon restoration within the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed depend on a rigorous monitoring and adaptive man- agement program. Together, monitoring and adaptive management will provide a stream of information and insight that can inform course corrections as the recommendations of this Plan are implemented. The future of salmon;s in our hands. Juvenile salmonid in the Duwamish. May 1005 photo. Page IS Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Solmon Habitat Pion Executive Summary-August 2005 1.15 NEXT STEPS The publication of this Salmon Habitat Plan com- mences the 90 day review period by the WRIA 9 Forum of Local Governments. The Forum may approve the Plan or remand it back to the Steering Committee for further deliberation. However, the Forum cannot make changes to the Plan. Following adoption of the Plan by the Forum, a minimum of five cities representing at least 70% of the population within the watershed must ratify the Plan before their respective legislative bodies. Only then will the Habitat Plan truly become final. This Habitat Plan also will be included as a chapter in the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan produced through the Puget Sound Shared Strategy. Within a year of Plan ratification, we will need to develop a detailed implementation plan and begin to pursue funding:We also need to arrive at agreements among all of the WRlA 9 participating jurisdictions on how to fund and implement the Plan. As a watershed. what assurances can we make and what risks are we willing to take are fundamental questions that need to be answered. In the long term, use of the action evaluation tools and the monitoring and adaptive management approach described in this Plan will allow local governments to continue to use the habitat planning process to meld Plan recommendations with their local regulations, policies, plans, and programs. A lot of hard work lies ahead. Progress to date, how- ever, and the love that so many people have for the place we call home offers tremendous hope. We know that it is not our generation alone that thrills to the sight of the mighty Chinook salmon returning to the Green/Duwamish River after years in the ocean. It is not just those of us alive now who enjoy the many benefits of a healthy watershed. Future generations depend on us to be good stewards and to recognize that clean water and healthy habitat are good for people and are good for fish. Let's get to work "making our watershed fit for a King." Page' 6 GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan Execut;ve Summary-August 2005 .. Q, .->i .. "" The salmon came riding home Home from longjollrneys throllgh the great seas How magnificent they flash Look, home is just lip there Pllsh on a little more ~ Weaving the waves together, the salmqn. Dance in small, joyful jllmps Scales shine a bright silver Riding the rhythm of the breaking waves They twist their bodies and leap Mleko Chlkappu Translated from Ainu Salmon Coming Home in Search of Sacred Bliss Source: Roche and McHutchinson (Ed.) 1998 ,. The following provided funding for the preparation of this publication: 8 ~ fib ~ e ~ :fiJrrYOF ~ /' .' '....... " () ~ IaBBItN ....'*~r(.~. . ~ WASHINGTON . ----..... IVlrh i. ~ @) ~ r~ ~ERRL K&D G ~>F'?>" 'f( ." ,.j>iA:\.: , .~ Enumclaw KJq:Ca..mdoftDlstrlct . KENT King County W.""~OT". J ~\ H "i'.'-;iii>>~ ~ ~ ~.>f. 'i~i>\ T~~ ~'; 1/ ~) ~,~.; ~. ,*_. ! 'I - ~~ - . \ \ / \."'.~., ~N'1'9" City of Seattle TACOMA WATER [!1 ;;., ",~/.<' uc.".n"'C~.'"T''' '.y ,,,. .,. , ~r: :"j 'E ~> " ,..:; . :\i {f , Alternative formats available ~ . -~~ ;;;;1 Do<:ument File Folder: WlRNT7...WRIA9/050~:-W9Hp_~ExecSum:pm7 Ipre ,"<. .", ,'-" ',. . ;:-: .~ -~*-;; Lo~atlon: King County Department of Natural Resburces and Parks _. ,Voice: 206-296-1920 TTY Relay: 711 ),', WLR Visual Communici'ltions and Web Unit Archives . , ;\;,,, '::?ii ',l' .", . ,., ;>:!,; , ~'J~: - - ~, ~ ::,' CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7th, 2005 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: David H. MO~ Manager _. FROM: Paul A. Bucich, P.E., Surface Water Manager ~& SUBJECT: Inter-Local Agreement Extension for Water Resource Inventory Area 9 POLICY QUESTION: Should the City extend the existing Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9 Inter-Local Agreement (ILA) for salmon conservation based planning efforts in the Green/Duwamish basin for one more year? BACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way has been an active member in two watershed forums, the Central Puget Sound and the Green Duwamish, since their inception. In 200 I the two forums were combined into one in an effort to consolidate efforts and recognize that the nearshore and mainstream river systems are intricately tied together. Federal Way agreed to this combining of efforts and recognized the benefits from participation through interagency coordination on projects, having a unified voice at the county, state and federal levels, consistency with regulations on stormwater management for quantity and quality controls, and sharing of ideas at staff and elected levels. In June of 2001, the City entered into an Inter-Local Agreement with 16 other jurisdictions in the GreenlDuwamish Watershed and the near shore environment to develop a long term salmon conservation plan, the "GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan" (the Plan). This Plan has been completed and presented to Council for your consideration. Federal Way has been an active participant at the WRIA 9 Forum (the governing body) as well as the Management Committee (oversees ILA service provider) and provided funding of activities such as the Ecosystem Restoration Study completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Green/Duwamish Watershed as well as the Seattle directed Nearshore Environmental Assessment Study through supplemental funding outside of the !LA agreement. The results of these studies have benefited Federal Way by developing an enhanced understanding of our nearshore conditions as well as helping to assess a need for any future projects. The Plan is the result of years of scientific investigations into the needs of salmonids in the watershed and along the nearshore. It is one of the most comprehensive salmon habitat plans developed in the nation and is intended to be used by all jurisdictions when evaluating goals and projects for salmon conservation efforts including habitat preservation and restoration activities. The remaining efforts for 2006 include obtaining approval and ratification from the various legislative bodies as well as pursuing approval of the plan at the State and Federal agency levels. Due to the reduced efforts in 2006 versus the previous five years, the City's contribution has dropped from an estimated cost for each of the past five years of $10,333 per year to $8,000 in 2006. This funding will come from the Surface Water Utility's operating fund. K:\LUTC\2005\11-07-05 WRIA 9 ILA Extension Resolution.doc Options: 1) Authorize the City Manager to enter into a one year extension ofthe WRIA 9 Inter-Local Agreement for a cost of $8,000 to be funded from the Surface Water Utility fund. 2) Do not authorize the City Manager to enter into the one year extension and provide staff with direction. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a one year extension of the WRIA 9 ILA for a cost of $8,000 to be paid for by the Surface Water Utility fund. Committee Recommendation: Forward option 1 to the December 6th, 2005 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. K: \LUTC\200s\11-07 -05 WRIA 9 ILA Extension Resolution.doc CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 2005 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: David H. M~ Manager. FROM: Rick Perez, P.E., CIty Traffic Engmeer ~ SUBJECT: /-5/ SR-18 / SR-161 Triallgle Project Status POLlCY QUESTION: For information only. BACKGROUND: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), m conjunction with Federal Highways Administration (FHW A), King County, and the cities of Federal Way and Milton, are in the process of evaluating the preferred alternative for the environmental process. The project would improve safety and reduce congestion in the 1-5 / SR-18 interchange and also divert traffic from the SR-18 (S 348th Street) / SR-161 (Enchanted Parkway S / 16th A venue S) intersection. At the February 7, 2005, Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting, the Committee was informed that alternative W4 was selected as the preferred alternative. The Committee requested WSOOT to consider two options to improve access from 1-5: one was a northbound off-ramp to Milton Road in the vicinity of S 3691h Street, and one was a southbound off-ramp to S 352nd Street. WSDOT analyzed the travel demand for adding the northbound off-ramp to Milton Road. The analysis found that roughly 100 vehicles per hour would use this ramp during the evening peak hour, thus it would not significantly improve operations at the remainder of the interchange. In addition, it would severely disrupt operations of the weight station and rest area, both of which would be prohibitively expensive to relocate. Therefore, WSDOT decided to abandon this option. WSDOT also investigated the travel demand for adding the southbound off-ramp to S 352nd Street. The analysis found that over 400 vehicles per hour would use this ramp during the evening peak hour, providing a significant benefit to the intersection of SR 161 and S 3561h Street. However, in reviewing the design, it was found that ramp would require significant deviations from WSDOT standards and prohibit all left-turn movements on S 352nd Street at the driveways to Costco and Home Depot. This would minimize the anticipated reduction in volume on SR 18. Given the significance of the deviations from standards required to construct this ramp, the likely opposition from adjacent businesses and the impacts to the intersection ofSR 18 and SR 161, WSDOT decided to abandon this option. Abandonment of the S 352nd Street off-ramp option has heightened focus on the operation of the SR 161 at S 356lh Street intersection. Interim improvements to this intersection were constructed by Federal Way School District to mitigate impacts of Todd Beamer High School. These improvements were anticipated to exceed the City's Level of Service (LOS) standard by 2009. Therefore, the City's adopted Transportation Improvement Plan includes a project that would add a second northbound left-turn lane from Enchanted Parkway to S 356lh Street and widen S 356th Street to five lanes between SR 99 and SR 161. However, the addition of volumes from the southbound off-ramp would cause this intersection to fail by the design year (2030) of the Triangle Project. Several alternatives have been analyzed by WSDOT, with three alternatives remaining. The simplest alternative is to relocate 16th Avenue S to create a 5-legged intersection controlled by traffic signals. In 2030, this would K:\LUTC\2005\11-07-05 Triangle Project Status.doc operate within WSDOT's LOS standard, but not the City's. It should be noted that, technically, as an off~ramp to a Highway of Statewide Significance, this intersection would be exempt from the concurrency requirements of the Growth Management Act. In order to meet the City's LOS standard, SR 161 would have to be widened to six lanes with raised medians between SR 18 and Milton Road S. A second alternative is to construct a 3-lane roundabout, potentially the first one in Washington State. WSDOT has concerns about how well this would operate, and in order to assuage some of these concerns, proposes to realign 161h Avenue S approximately 500 feet to west. However, the LOS is significantly better than any signalized alternative. A third alternative would be to realign 16th Avenue S and keep the intersection of SR 161 and S 356th Street as a signalized intersection. Again, this would not meet the City's LOS standard in 2030, but would meet WSDOT's LOS standard. As with the 5-legged intersection, in order to meet the City's LOS standard, SR 161 would have to be widened to a 6-lane divided facility between SR 18 and Milton Road S. Expert reports are being prepared for the environmental document, with a proposed release date of June 2006 for the Draft Environmental Assessment. WSDOT staff will be present to provide a brief presentation and answer any questions the Committee may have. Staff Recommendation: This item is for information only. However, if additional opportunity for comment is desired from the City Council, this item could move forward to the November 15,2005 City Council Consent Agenda. Committee Recommendation: This item is for information only. K: \LUTC\200S\11-07 -05 Triangle Project Status.doc CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: October 24, 2005 To: Federal Way C Council Land Use and Transportation Committee Via: David H. osel anager From: Tho Kraus, Finance Mana~ Subject: Federal Way Public Schools 2006 Capital Facilities Plan/School Impact Fee The City has received the Federal Way School District's 2006 Capital Facilities Plan with the proposed school impact fees for the City's annual review and adoption. The new fees, if approved, will be effective January 1,2006, are $3,393 per single-family unit and $895 per multi-family dwelling unit. This is a $525 or 18% increase from the $2,868 single-family rate, and $10 or 1% decrease from the $905 multi-family rate. A number of variables go into the school impact fee calculation. Among them are the District's facility needs, construction costs required for schools, and the student generating factor (average students per household in elementary, middle, and high schools respectively) in new single and multi-family developments. The calculated amounts are then reduced by any state matching funds and voter approved property taxes for construction. Finally, a 50% factor is applied to eliminate imperfections in the fee calculation model. Attachments: Federal Way School District 2006 Capital Facilities Plan (the new impact fee calculation is on page 26). Committee Recommendation: Forward the draft Federal Way School District 2006 Capital Facilities Plan and proposed impact fee to full Council for approval with implementation of the proposed fee of $3,393 per single family development and $895 per multi-family development effective January 1, 2006. Committee Member, --- - . , Federal Way Public Schools 2006 Capital Facilities Plan , I I cIIU.t\'lIJ,o.(.I r- Building for the Future . , FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Evelyn Castellar Charles Hoff Thomas Madden Bob Mil1en SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy . . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ii INTRODUCTION lll-V SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 1 Inventory of Educational Facilities 2 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 3 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 4 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 5 Six Year Finance Plan 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 7 Map - Elementary Boundaries 8 Map - Middle school Boundaries 9 Map - Senior High Boundaries 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENT A TION Introduction 11 Building Capacities 12-13 Portable Locations 14-15 Student Forecast 16-18 Capacity Summaries 19-23 King County Impact Fee Calculations 24-26 SECTION 4 SUMMAR Y OF CHANGES FROM THE 2005 PLAN 27 -30 ii . , FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2005 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2005. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of $83 million in September 1999. This bond provided for Todd Beamer High School ($44 million); Sequoyah Middle School ($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million). Other planned and completed improvements included in the bond proposal were: parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications. A Middle School Transition Team began meeting in May 2001 to develop recommendations for the middle school programs. These recommendations were adopted by the Board of Education on March 25, 2002. The adopted recommendations include block instruction with 2 teacher teams meeting with about 60 students daily for students in the 6th and ill grade. Eighth grade teachers will see 90 students each day. This structure lengthens contact time for students with fewer adults and is believed to develop stronger relationships. Fewer transitions for students will provide continuity to the day and promote a calmer campus. The 2006 Capital Facilities Plan reflects a reduced capacity to accommodate the middle school block instruction. iii .' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) As smaller class sizes roll forward into the secondary levels, we anticipate a slight decline at middle school between 2006 and 2011. This does not diminish the need to open Sequoyah Middle School in the 2005/06 school year. With the opening of Sequoyah Middle School the average enrollment at all middle schools will be between 700 and SOO students. Another initiative that will impact capacity at the secondary schools is the Puget Sound Early College. Highline Community College is offering this program to 11th and 12th grade students at the Federal Way campus. The program allows promising 11th and 1ih grade students the opportunity to complete their high school diploma and the Associate of Arts college degree in their final two years of high school. The district has a cooperative agreement with Head Start for facility use to serve income eligible Pre~Kindergarten students. A new Headstart facility on the Harry Truman High School campus opened in January 2005. This facility centralizes Headstart services in the Federal Way community. Headstart was housed at three of the elementary schools in the Federal Way District. Currently the only decentralized program is in a portable facility at Sherwood Forest Elementary. The District intends to expand the ECEAP Pre~ Kindergarten program. The District is considering offering a Kindergarten through Sth grade instructional configuration. This program could be offered at an existing site, with appropriate facility changes. Other options for opening this program are new construction or purchase and remodel of an existing building. As the projects from the 1999 bond are finalized, the District is presenting a 20-year plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings. If approved the $245 million bond to be run in 2006 would replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school Lakota. Federal Way High School would be replaced and capacity increased by approximately SOO students. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze-like layout. The cost to rebuild is $81 million. The reconstruction would increase the capacity of the high school by 800 students, or by about 33%. Part of this cost is included in the Capital Facilities Plan impact fee calculation. The non-instructional projects included in the 20- year plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future. Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location The proposed bond package includes shared instructional and community facilities. The current stadium would be moved to align with the City of Federal Way Celebration Park sports fields and future Community Center. A performance auditorium is planned for a corner of the Federal Way High School campus. This is a facility that would serve the District schools as well as the community. An environmental instruction and retreat center is proposed for property adjoining Sequoyah Middle School. iv , FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL F ACILlTlES PLAN SECTION 1- THE CAPITAL }~ACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 1 . . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1 st A venue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th A venue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd A venue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 W oodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 34620 9th A venue S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1 st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 360th ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40th Ave S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th A venue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 36001 1 Sl Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACES Internet Academy 32020 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NONwINSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Ki tchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003 ECEAP Offices 30819 14th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property I Site # I Location I 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW - 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S - 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th A venue SW ~ SW 334th & SW 335th Streets ~ 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW - 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th A venue S ~ 17.47 Acres 82 1 st Way S and S 34Znd St - Minimal acreage 74 3737 S 360th St - 47.13 Acres (Part of this site is being used for Sequoyah Middle School) 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S - .36 Acres 81 S 33Znd St and 9th Ave S - ZO Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 3 -- FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST. EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees. Elementary Schools: Replace Existing Building Future Bond Sales Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla Lakota Middle School Replace Existing Building Future Bond Sales Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Future Bond Sales Increase Capacity Todd Beamer High School Library conversion to increase Impact Fees classroom capacity The District is also planning the replacement of some non-instructional facilities. The District has purchased 20 acres for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functions. Transportation, Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non-instructional functions will be housed at this centralized location. As part of the 20-year plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students include expansion at the Decatur High School site. These plans supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 4 . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST. NEW FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Sequoyah Middle School Site 74 Anticipated source of funds are current bond issues and state match. 5 .,..,I~, ~ ~N IQ~~I~I~ ~ 1C""''''''08 000 0;;"'" ~ CXI~ ""';ft t"1 ~ 18 00 0 0 0 0 0 """''''~I<:> """ N. .."... ~ (;:tN_"".tti 88Q~ ~ -= S ~ 8888:5Q '" ...on",..... __NO"" I<:> .;:IN''' "''''''''''''''0 :J '<t~ ""''''':00''''' ~ <= J., "'" NN"NN<ri''''': "S ;::: ;;;:::;""''''7 ~ E-< ~ ;;;;;;;;;~~ e .f#t ~ =- f".t tS -5 ~ 8 ~ N . ~ " N.... '" It) :os .... ;::. N ~ cI) ~s "" <YS '" M ~....-I. <1.\ "'7 ~ '" .;; ..-. .-.. ...- .....-.. ~ ..-.. ..-.. ..-....-.. .J 0 =- .~ =-(:! C:!.-< ~Bce < g g ~ CIl tfJ c.I.l ....c::: ~ ,..t:l t;I.) ~ (fj H...... ~ '" 2:l l:l'g'gBO B'g~l:lO ....~ ~ ~ -3 ~""~E-< ~"en~E-< ....=> N. N~ u ....~u:."'" "",u:.""t)~"" IC I<:> ~ ~~-g2 ",2~g~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.s~~J5 ~J5~~.s 5 ~ "" ~ ""... = .B '" Z :I $ = 0 co 0 g ~'O; :5 ~.J 0 'g....J :5 = 8;; t:l.. r:I:J 0 => <ri' tti :J jg ~ !Xl =~ N N ,J;:" t=l S g ~:- ,'" ~ ~ ~ N => N N J3,p '" ~ N "'" "'" ~'" <;..0 = .; '0 oS U "Jl 6 ~ 880 = ~~ S IJj tt) ;:::0 t ....J ; Q'\. . ";. ";. J:l ,p co. -< _ g'2 gg~ ~ 52 g t: ~ =~ ""."".0. ~ .; ,!l'" o. ~ N = I"- I"- '" Q'\ gj' )3'S g ..... ~ N "'7"'7..... N ,_ "'.... '" U ~ "'7 """ .;Q.....s ~ = "";3 .s ~ 1'l (5 ~ 80000 =" :5 ~ ..?olEl 3 N 000'" It) ~ '" "" ~g '" 00 . o. q o. N. "'t _ N ,5 '6l, @ ~ to ~ .S 00 => 0 0 0 0 ..... .... .", .... '" "'" g o ~ 8 t:: ~ ~ 8 8 ~ ~ " g 'B ~ ~ 5'!l o ~ N g r-:r-:<ri'<ri'o It) l'l 8 8 ",.g I.I::i o eQ N "'7 "'7 "'7 "'7 ;; ~ ~ !;J ~ ,~" ,'" en Q.l El <d 0 '0';; is ......... R ,a .., 0 '" U ....... '" 00 0= <:l " '3 -5~ ~ :J ~ <Ll 88 g8 '" ~ "g "'~ i':l "" ._ l-; t-- " " . ~ ::; ... " ,,~ '" - :::l t-- => 00 0= ... '" ..c =Q :;:, 00 ...... = ;:;;; r- r- 0 '<t ~ " "" '" '" .ts t:l.. .- = c3 0 0 '>&> t-- g ",.: >--. '0 ;.::I '" '" >- 'tl N => ""' <ri' <A ~ 9< o.~ [iJ ~.8 >< .... Q N "'7"'7 .... e;:,,,, _ -9'" :ll ..... <Ll "'7 '~",:El 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.. 5NF .8 oS .!:J ....J r~ ~ :<0 ~~~. o>l 8-~ tJ! <: _ 00 01<:> 00 ,a ",03 >~ eo: ."00 " "" "" ,0 u.l "0 t:~oo 0"" ~'g'iJ :a <.i=1Llut! Cl <Ll ~ # ;;:; ~ g NO'" '" ~ .8 8 '.5 8. [f OIl g ::::1 g "'" -. :~ ",,}1 ~ ~ '~.1:l & ~ '" ::: <Ll ro ~N "'7~ lil",,, 2 'gbEAl'! :.a > ~ ~e~ b .8oci~.!:Jgj' ~ <l) ~ lil el --" '" 6 .... " '0; ..... "" "0 ..'='.. ... ..... ........... ... il l:I 0 "'.::0 P<'- '" -' - .......!. "'.....'~ 0 ,~ s '" -" ~ "0 aSg ......< t ,~ii fJ ~:@ '" B ~ "0 2 ..~. ..~.....~.......... '2 ,'" i> ~ '" 'C E "" <l) "~ .._.... ... ...... ~:E "" "" ..". 1l " co. "" .... ~::l .;;..fH .~ 'C!-<" .- "'.... Ol ..s '" 8 .g, '0 ....... ... ....Q ~. ri ~ :: ':; [ '" ~ ~ <Ll 8 <r: ..~. O~" ~ ,g~l.gz Vl 0... >. S '" " s" ,~OJ t! i:i~~ ~ 'E>->gg", ~ 0 '" "" -" 0 " " co. o ~ "d "'C U 1=1 (od '"0 bt) U ~ ~ ~ E!!!' "" '~ ,3 ~'~ "" '.... "'.a!a.....~ en :2~j~<2 n",~~t'i w '" '" "" g '2 '." t 'U; '" "" .... >--.0<B>""'P'~.;gj;j= E-< .9 '" '" "" .- e a >'" '" '," 00 ::s :Q~-@g~;:;:;\-; ~=g ....J .... 1:!~"'~~C1.s.;.:.l~l:I o u "".8 gj'd~""fJ~'O""'O o < ",,,,0,,g8~<B,,,"'~ ::c ... il~!iiu~ .!:l",,0:J'" u ... ~ A > t:il "" 1:1 :<i; " '8 ~ 8 r.fJ eo: B.!:JE]l~~5.88.~~ ~ ~ @E~C!~.::o"'13~~i:i ~ 0 B " ~ ;::, 5 'g ]l!.s ~ ~ z ~ gj 8 '" ~ " '" - ~ e .... ~ ~ 2; ~)3 lil ,~,g ~ 'P' fr ~o:; ~~{:gl\)<:.o'l~.g~t:ia""" E-< ~ ] z ] ,g ~ '" t:il ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ (1) .~ Q) .~ .~ ~ ~ qj ~ 5 ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z~ N~-.1 IriI..O~oO~ FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-5), seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), five senior high schools (grades 09-12) and one school serving students in grades 6 -10 for the 2005/06 school year. The Internet Academy serves grades K-12. In January 2005 the Board of Education adopted new secondary boundaries beginning with 2005/06 school year. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public fad lity infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. 7 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES mE F _M..... ._.....G I H fve~~~:'~~~Y Public Schools---." '--\\..'l~~~n~:"~~f.j'~;~]'-~~~~-~I~~I' (~~~~m---'-----K,~,'L."---:'::-ll . . I I .~ ' J ,0>, ..~ . j , :;~ ~ CI!Y _._... } l: ~ ".::" ~ "',~ l : I JlSo ll,l,\tT~ "~~,, . ~. I ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS Z""h,(,~f ':~ "1 -""'"...... .:: 1/ ,.-: f i ",..., i _'.""H... '9 . """. ..." ' ': .' .'r~ "1' 11 l~',I\;' ,..." Code--. COde--1I !"'lil a ~.I ,!;;tl!;:~.. 0.'''')'' -,.,Ii I I 111 ~L -. ~' '" ..! ,,': 1 Adelaide C.e 30 lIlahee E"9 : m~' · .~M pEEl ~; , 8 ' '<<:.- 2 Brtgadoon B.8 31 Kilo G-6;] ,! ;::""; ..~" r~ ~ ' :, ))..& : ;] 3 Camelot G-5 32 Lakota 0-6 " .\I,.lU" '1" 1i'f1i!i J" I'''' ,,~. 4 Enterprtse 0-9 33 Sacajawea E-5 .. .. :. ~ll!I..' ~,,: j ....;, I~ _ '; ~ <'. < , & O_n Gables #,-7 34 Saghalle C-8 l::::. """ . , ",,1 n~ ' & Lake Dolloff G-6 35 Totem G-3 '" , ". ~ ~- ./ .:\ ;' I -, i 7 Lake Grove 0-6 36 Federal Way Public Aoademy E-8 ........., ~-... :.;.';;:; ~.,::::. Y"M .: '"'' " j' :-... & Lakeland E-9 ~~ ,~..... i-':.;;g. ~.~ - n , 9 Mark Twain F'" ~~; i .. ~::' ~ S ~ j I ~tl .( I _ 10 Meredith Hili H-8 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS .... "*. ,~: e'{ :: . -" =~ . ''', ,;, T 11 Mirror Laka E-8 . -, .1.' .... P< 'M.. tj JJ ';~ 12 Nautilus E-& C d _ . 3 I .., "~I'; ~ Il " "'7J;;l..,. -~ _! 115 ~ 3 130lymploVlew C-7 oe I...":""'.., L ,,' I 14 Panther Lake "-8 'N'" , ~p . , " 40 Dec:atu, C-8 , _, '" 16 Rainier View F-10 41 F_ral Way E-li . - l' , , 16 Sherwood Forest 0-8 42 Thomas Jefferson G-4 Ii~' M " ;1 j' -Ll ..' ~ ~~ :~7~~:a g:~ 45 Todd Beamer E.9 n"a..~ If 'r" i ;/~:'" .' ~. ~ 19 S t G 2 49 Harry S. Truman F-6 ~ ~ .! OJ -I "'- '. j'JJiJ.:r unnycres - - - wOOCtAII ~ BliTZ .. ~ 20 Twin Lakes B-6 """ ; 1'IlI'.tf: . ~, 9 ,"" 'ii .' - ,;;; ,;I~"'~~' I 21 Valhalla G-4 ; ~ .. :"m;' ,..: ., "-"'..' \"",.. , 22 Wildwood F-5 Futu.... Sohool Sites - am ' t 1 ...N:r 3: - C~.el 'f"" ';;' .... i, 23 Woodmont F-3 Surplus S,tes - """,,:, ,.\ ~.~ ';:" . ~:..! J ,'~ rt-), 4 :: "'.~' =, '"1 '~..'.:'1C1211 . ' ,i ,.~.' , . ....' . 1'~ . .,.' : 4- f ;=:~ ., N., ;;'r'~:i.io.' i~ ' H. r rr..-.illl:~ .. ~~(~.. " ' 81 Educational Servitoe Center F-6 - .; I.. ~l'.;: ....~ ,l ~~ Wi'; .1. . . .... ~." , " ' 'I~' ~ KI'~,~ TV '1 ........ c ~... "''iF"'''' II - 8~~ CITVUMln -~Jil-' ,." ~ '" ~ .;.. .. 'L I ParkS - ~,,1" 11 ~, 2 li ~ :>;"! t .i D'~ " 'h"-\'~'k" .....,' ,-.",~.~:I, " '''~....., '-:1..>I"ffi ",' _". :, !U'; '''~' - ~~. .' ~~I y?'c. I~ ,~. - ; I"'~, '," -, 5 ,11,,;lll' ,. ,,-..' i -", . ,.. ~ .' , ,I .~, . , .l; ... - .. 5 k"'=',..t ........ J1'I~ :r'!Sl:1l - I A I 8 I c -::.7' .rl.I'2:1lYJ . ,S..< e;n'-';~ ~,r't' i \rFir, 'I · ~ . '~" ~i I "' :J.-- 'F.... ~~ ,_. · - .. I......" I"i;., ,-' .' ''''Ml .", '~i.'~"'h m..' ~- . ."~. ..:. ". '.. ," :~ _ !~., .~:tiS . . ......1"...... - ,0" ~ ,-1- H ,., "1_' '1')._ r; . ... , ._ iIIl"!"'" _~r 1 ];; ! JAiI::t..~ n, _..11' Jj;,_. 1s1l1In,I~\IIE:III.~-t' 1__.jII:.[,..~';.: i;,.iSt ~ ',. · --- I ~.ti\"'t'l ~-ITII - t.l.'BIi ~.. ..l~,,\\ k'~ ; I~. '?~;" I a~1t""'~",6.~~ ~\ ~ ~_L ~,: ~:~~.~'=, M~I; i,;~~ 41 !~(~!~~~~:;/:f" r\l; ~<~')\1 ~~ ..i:..~2~;I~>:~~_~ t; ~ 'J/ ~ tr.A :Jill ". .":f-:I J....&...:....~S'l~)w:- ,....ii1_,~ _II ~ ';.. . ~~,!, LIMITS ~ .,,, '-', 'I ~.;<, I. 7 " . _~,' .I!.... '" \. '-'M, ," . " I ~~'1-;r;f'; . ,J "i-~~ 'W "." " ,,(l;f.:~~t ~" ,,. '" 'i 'Jj ~. "'"'~""r-::.~"7!I<;,,>>,,.1-,.,~~'~'h;'. ',.... '" ,,'..' .~... ,,,"il ~~ , ..... ,. _.. 4 ~ ., ' .' I """ ,.",... . 'lIlJ "w:::nO/!!i _.,. " l' ...... _ - " . .....J.. ,'".-- $>~ ,,' ~ {it;.. "0"32 '.' '\~):">':,.'" - 111,."' . ~ 81........, " ~~.Jii 111:".. __ . 6 ,[, t t= ~I.::.... ~ :'I,~,:'i rPoI"'" "Alllk 1.& ".: :t. ;:i". ,. ... ~.:I . :i l ~,[ 4 i\!: ~ ~;:. , ~ ....:. :..., . . , ,il ~~ t,,!? "', ' '-";;ir<; "1"- """, nm. ''', " - ."' '----->." ' .. ~." ,,,. I" A ;A~~':;f~':.I. :0.:: ~'". ..,~~ .~; ..~".. I, l..'~~\:~.."~i ~ ~">;::::L:~r AI Sj'''''"': ,J\ 1 ~W~:::::'I!~iJ'l ~- "'. ...-=' ,. " ..,. .",'~"".- " ' 'f"""'r. . ~ -,....I.~ · .,m. ~ ~ ~ " . d"'" . ..., .. ...... nl ;~' '.' '"" . "::!" ~ . Ii fj '" . t ..11. ..... . ~ II I !. ... ~ .... ~ .., UN ll:ll 4f. .. A , "),1 " . " -" ;l!j". I ~l . . ", .~. ~:: (j~ 1 #' .m.._ '0; ~\ .. i' ., I: ~ ~J" , :... 13" f:; ":~17- '''I:u~,,,~.~ , ,"~,:, ~T"'A~~ /J mu, w;.i.~~: ~ ,i 7 'lIt~"1 !l.~ . ~, :Tl. 0.lf,,,j:j ,.., ' ,~ '- ;~~..., n ""'. , ' L~. R 7- .~~~"i:'~ _~ ;~.;'~~ ',~", ~ -~! 'I"'ti.~,.:,.~;. . !J15tJ<~:;1' !"~ ~:..:f'".:,.! Jj"" 7 '. - .,"". "~'>>". ..... ...~~~, J ,;:;;,.:~~,' -;r."' ~ ~...I .I ~~ ~ r~.,' ......~ ':LJ.".,. . L~<~~ ~~ ~ ~ ,Ih, f_iJ.I' uw.. ....,,' ...."'''... ~:~.., <';. ,- ..~' ;1-: " If, '''J.I" .. ....? ~ .7..l?\ ,J if. 'l,,. ::.~ ' "... t:i. ..... ",_,0 .,'" _ ~ ~ ' ~ li.'; < ; ~'\lm"'- .:i~ .~:t ~- ~l - . _ .." ~#:' Ii ~".: r ~ 8 ' . '.' 34 w... -i ,". l' '-" I . , I I N -, ow';;';: C.m..., . ~"". ~ . <-"'-' '" c .'" ~ ~ "..~ ~ ~fo1"';'\. './';/ . ~ WHt'RU"f'I.JSE" .::-=:'" .i:~ t ~ ~ :~ I ~ 't"';() ~._..-ti' 7" 9A '" H(AD6ljARTEftS i "':1': r~;o :,. . " .~. f.jji- . - I ~,",<II_. !! 1 ;: !- -. 8:::E!;~- , ~ !''.:::'''-(~ . -'"7 m ~t.J i1"gj ,~I'~IG,~)o .:8 W E -'~ "-*- " " - 14 ~I~I ~6r; I 1 .il.. p'.J,1IJ II!J, ,U \ ~ - I ~ _, ~ ~ ( -;(""~w 1~" '" . : I I" t idft'n= ~ ~ <r 01 .. ~ '(." ~~/)_~ ~:~~ ,~II :~,.._ 1 , 'M "r.,,~ _~ ,~,~, . _: ' ~"'''' c ".. ~'- ...!fil :~,,: ' !I'awn. ~.:~!:l :l."-_Iu~"!!!= I...... . <l C1}~""" .(. ~ ii,itf 11. I:;; 1 ~'1. ~ , .. ':!; "If. . ~ : !II C1;I n~stl' :!I ~ ./~"..i! <( 3Sj~1 6" ~ I!I 3~ I S y,.. ".;~'" ~ ~, 4" fa < ""'- <"'. < Jt 0 ~ ...,,, 65 [t-- 33nlN~ 1.1 ;t...\H ~ ..~~ II: ;-:.. ,#J ~ "It.. ~~1s~}(,,,,, '!i:~~ 0{ j.... ! _--_____ '""';I;,",,; .. '"I''' "'~.. jF' .. ~ "'.~ ; ,rr. ~" . ..:::::;::'.:=:;::;;:,=:-..:;:..~= . , · , ! .JI-'-..-.," ~~ II '" ")!i6 ll: 111 :r,<, if... ij_ll~ :l I __...... ;:1.1 ~I ~I ~I ~ ..j , , ~illf. ~ I~I '1~, L '- 1.' j :;I? ! \'iiffl'-"'~~":, I B,o-l'IrIsllId 1I1t',U'" ~ ~ ~D ... '.:~_ ~ S~SllS, J'.'- .1 ~ Sill... . .. ~ I ,,.,,,,"'''',,''' ," ' ;,-"" :.::!.B:': ~L " -.. .... ."'. I .'.", 9 .9 ~~~~~;::: ?j )111 ~I WI k-P-I II ~. .'.'." 45 '" ~I~t -";tll ~ w I _..~,.."..._~ ~' ~i;r...l ,,~5 30 liD ' d . ;... -:. 74. -"'-;I "" 1 .~, "'II1II C!SM"~PJ!!'lii.\']I;~ i[ ~ ~ s,,,......, ,," 0'" "~ .1(;49.~ ~I;; 6J8ifSI:':l::;: '"",. o :4 ~ ~ 1 - 0.. ~., l~~,~ liI-i~' (~-m-... ~1..r 8' ~~ \ 1', ko, .. ,~tj...~ ,. II< ':}I:. > ~ 1 iii ..~ ~_,~~ "I: ").. ~ )6i6 Sl s:'" ... ~ PI HI '! {.', Ir 0( '" ~ _i. ' ....."".,.........,,, ~j ~ p ~ ~ ~r; ." ^ ~,. P' ~J,<, .. .. · :,~~ ~j~,WI .' .~"'.. ~ ~; I ~., '~~ "';';61 ~, {': 'M . :- .. 0 ~"..,: -~if ! '" - "I' :;. .~,.J.~~jfi ::'iJt..:,,, 37 :" . ,:,,;T, ,;" \ ".mu...:" " .,,'". ?'\.~\- . ;. ::".. t'~~~"l' ft. ;; ! ; j ~... ..::::. 'ilf JJ ~ '''~::; "~,,,:"A<"" . . i _ .... ..~.' th.. ..~ ." ""I. i '-- . d I W P bl' 5 hi! /0 ,- ", r ..Jli, i ~ ; 'I Ii. ~. 10 Fe era ay u IC C 00 5 i ~ " . ~ --:"f. " ~ .-..1:i:J: - -'..' ~.; ~ ~, m E_"""",.",,,", ! ,~. .,-' · ! l~ ~ i ~"l : . . 61l8tnC!l8 Scrvl~~ t............ .. f('j1. CocIht b~- ..........~........ I '*1 j _ i 384 th ~ '4:5-1000 11 ElF oun.v C. '."bDlr~ ~"':::$dIo>aIH PROPOSED MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES ill Federal Way Public Schools Eve/}' Student, . Read., 1 lIIahee m__'.... -"-' Kilo Lakota 2 Sacajawea Saghalie Totem .l 3 7th Middle School i 4 PII_/i N .E S ~~ID~_""""PIIIIll:~.~~~ ~<lrf\',~IIIIIdwl~/J/_~J "'___I'9'IlIW~___~~_ """'5tIMlI",.... afr-j:"~ 100;/jSf~f'I\Ll(II ~,W'!II!OJ',!m ~~t"l!fl ~iII>>,AII""'_ . . . . - - ""'''Ol(.~AI,.t:IIlrMlU; ffi '" 10 Federal Way Public Schools , ~ Every Student. a Read.t i . . Btl$inef.1.~fviC'C> 9.~200Q HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES ill E · MO"" ., F",,::.:t'" ,,'1ll:::'" G J H Federal Way Public Schools ----- ----\"'---- ::-;~-~\.l1Jf'~.:~--~:~.-\: i\m..m.--------~~. -.--.- -~,:~-.: ...~ ~l.~:-"i' ....... , EvetyStudenl.aR=kr \ " ,.' __ t. S" ~,' i I . . I 'n - ~- ,. JI': .,. . ; , :~,R ~ CI"!V __ ~ :::" ~ 'I ~ I, \ ffi' ; u~; l/WIIIU Bl"'" .f~;, I ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS z"".,~ ':~ . ~ '-::'"..,.' .... II.:< :'~~ . '. .. i ~ ~1"'1~ ~ ':i.\ ~ 'i _' ~ 12 '-~1" / ti------ Code.-. CodlI-. ,..;lJ..i. 11 ~mll~ "...."...iI, I Z.' ..:, in .. '. ~ ,.1 : 1 Adelaide C~ 30 lI'ahee e.9 ' ~~ ~L'M~ ,.t" 'M '': 2 Brlva<I<><>n 6-11 31 Kilo G~ 2 Z/~!.'l~.,: .~, 'M"---'._. d ~, <:,.. ,1~4 i 2 3 Camelot G-S 32 Lakota O~ :. ,~ .~::.. , I' "'-"' if' 4 enterprise 0.9 33 Sacajawea e-s _ 7" ~ j,!.... M)'., _,':: . ''''!I\ ". , 5 G....n Gables A.7 :w Sallhalle C-1I ..... ~.",..;, . U',.'a. :,,' , . F . : 6 Lake Oolloff G" 35 Totem G-3 . . ... .... .." .:,~;' .: 7 LakeGrove O~ 36 F_ra' Way Public Academy e-ll ~,~~~~ ""'9: I. ~:~i . f;!~. : ",I, 1\ ' '- 8 Lake'and e.9, ....~Il< li'~~"' :'." ~. ~"S258 I MCllrk twain F'" " It II;. ~ _ , i J 11 ~ l1.t 10 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOU I ~ I-'T ~ ~ ' M: .. " k'. ~ .15 11 MllTOr Lake E~ '':f' oW:' f-~. II:l ~'Jo-.. il~ 12 Nautilus e.5 Code _ . 3 i ._-... .. b;!l~ " . ..'. ~,i ,:;~ 3 13 Olympic VIeW C-7 ,F'?: rr;: 'l~~ L' . 14 PanlherLake E-1I 40 Oecstur C-lI I .--' Wi . '- . 15 Ralnl..View F.10 41 Fed8raIWay e-s ~~. ~ r ~~flj i 36 0 .. 15 ShfllWood Forest o-s 42 Thomas Jefferson G-4 ,~' - : - , : 17 SIlVer Lake D-7 46 Todd Beamer e.9 11 'r - . . , :: 18 Star Lake G., 49 Harry S. Tn"nan F-1I ~" :~! ' ~.. -.' ,:.. ~ l' Sunnyc_t 0-2 --.00_ ' .. un". y _ 20 Twin Lakes 8-6 'EA~" I: ~f; 8 i~' - ElG ~ ~nllol ..... \ 21 Valhalla G-4 ; ." . . .. : 22 Wildwood F-5 Fu1ure School SItH -. . ,~.Jt.::/';;!I ~ ~- ! - ,"". ~,' . . ~~ """'- 23 WQOdmont F.3 Surplus Sites - :';::':'" 4 -1~': )\ ..- ...,;"". Liiii," ,_.' ,. ' 4iS~ .~,;," . . i ".,. :' ~,:,'; i 4- _. t. ~ to. ~, ' 81 Educational Sttf"YiC9 Center F..f - -t .. ," JIO." .! I 95 MallWtnanc...operatlons.Transportlltlon e-ll - Code - . -'~ '. . ~.. ~ ' 4:'.' ,_.".._ ._ .... : ,,-'........~ .... iIIr.. L" ' .~I ., K~.~ r" '1 ........ ~J; ~.. ., II . .., ill ,,- U $, Clf~ ....~II 'f ,,... .".-' ~ ~ n.O n;..--, ~ ~ i. . t~~ ~Ia Parks - D...t 0iIII .w.....~ ~~'~~iI ;-.'., l:r;Ii'~J:'" ill Ii" ~ ;;~ ,,'~ =. :::::: - "';' ....~.. .~ ... [.~ S . . i'E:""p\.".. '" PI .; F ldlJ...... I.., .A'i.. ,'l ., -~. ~.~..' rAJ. . I I A I B I c -. . , r~.. ... 'L~ ,: 11 h , I FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON and VlC'I~NfT ".~'l fo;' ....:..=:.. .: < .._ .:- ...... ~H :,-,. "3 . ~ ~ ftt>~. ~I S I .! . ,.' ".---<l I ~ ...' --:.I,.' . . o f 'Mo"t~' [' ,T~~~:-' .' -, . _ :;;;. ~,' ~: ~- T soliN ;. ~:t ~ "IJHI,JKII"~ ~~ _~, ~ ~ .u.r~l:e . ~ 1.._ ~ .~t "Jill ~ ~,-~ +- f'V,f'- ---.. .:I'~M\l:tt~I~:"" ,.. """ S ....~~....._ ..t 1"'-lI~ I I . dM""~UfI\jI. 'I" ~"', ....t~! ~ ~:- !.~"""':~:... 1']'1" I ;a;:,I"LIMTrt ~ 1<_11: .. _'141 ~ 0-'" "t".l:HC "'~ ,.....: ..$: 7 'II _*"L 1"" .. ~.. i 41Qt 'i. .~III :. I . ."~...~ ,it'"'' ",!,,,~:g;... ..J'm. W L,*,,,," ...... '''HIm.i ~~:B.. 'i~'~;1l 1 ..._ 6 ""P\. ~ ~ ,.t1!fi. ... ! __,P ! ...,,.~ ; III . III I ~ 3.L;' ~r -. ~~ .. - H'/I., Ull~...... \;-j _ , ".., ~~~...I...~'. l~- >;::: ,\ ~ ~ -..r:I\."~ ,,:I[;.~~~' ., .I!! I..J_~ -,'" ._ 'r:::-" ...1,1 "~ . , " 1k..._~.~...: "'0.. 32' .:'T .(f,~"' ~ ,. ~. ~ '!L.n. ~ ~ 81 ~. ~ . "., ' '! ,--=0'" . 6. I ~ It. ... i ~I'I" 'fl. , '''/1" It - ~ ~"""",:"" . ~*':Iil ': t ~ ': ~~ ~=_~ ' if' ~~~.~.~.... rf3:,H,~~,' ! :i::" II J ....".. ..... 1;;;'..: 1";1=~. ' . '. .. " . co....; 'I------- r \,10< , ;": . I'M'" ,,,,,.J1 .Ii II... r'~ '1'i<;-' 40 r----o:l <C;. .. ~r- I :il II>'J.I. ~ ""'" M':~ 201.11:: 'L '..1' "; .- t:.:: ; '.t;:. ".~'!lI! I ,':, ,,,:;.~ ,::li~t ~~~. ~ ,~:." - J ~ ~., i ~:' ... . -, ~~- ~~ :YO'.::. ~_ ~ · ,- ;r€-~ j' .If . .,~~~&".. I>>... ',~ · ". Ii ."- ~~ ~ ~ "".~~ ~\\ '...... ';~^ . 5 ~ ~ ~.. 1 1- 7 - 1 .. ~'" %:3;;t,,- ',lI ., '_III III ~ I'! !( Ii. SrJ '~ . t ~ ~~~".2].."'.!!~ ,,....- - ~ l~ 7 "I .R, ' . '.._ ~ ~ t~~~~! //.. ,'_'~ ~. ... . )'/ ,.. j >PI .."!; . t ~"i I~~ .. '" .. ~":"i':.{, " }~:i"'''''''',"i-'''1 i1 ~. u..~.l ..- M'~ ,'. , ., ....7 ~ J "- ,k~~. I "'",," ,7 ~ .... R"b....&r.;..l ~..p y '1IIop- ~~ L, JII" -- 'Pf.' · l'. ,,' "I.. ,~ .... ...- <,." ~I'l~ - .. . :>; "2....8..... 1. lI'~'" '-.; .'... ,- ~\; ,;::;_ JI.;.' ,n" .. N g 8 ,E...,l '~~ .:':" ~:':\"~'.. ~ . ....._ ~ 'I!:.'-<>'.:~" . .' ; .- .' ....: '." ~,~C.~# 2rit.~:~ ;i/~'1 J ~ J .:::::,::!'- ~~'~'~" i~ :8 ~ ~ - It -.~ ~ ~ ~"t ~!Jtt.s /~ Si4451....3l.iJr. U!!.t .u . · ~,. -~; : · "",,' "'I ...6iP:~;(;fJ M~! J \ ; W E ~ * .......( .' ~I:I s!J _ A'I. :€;\~illJ.> .....1";, .. A l _ ..~, 2!'" '.J\t:.~ 111"--' -_ '~ .~.~,'l f.. " .,..,~~. f" t ;:::'~ ~ ~~ - ..--~ ;~-"'. :/ : ~l.,-. 1:"-ld1:~ -".I~ ,....~~ "I ~i1iJ! I S y,,- \=---.' ."R' .. ~: ~ . . . .,~ ,;'. ~""'l .w"", 6 10---- ~ ~ ~;. = of t1~ .,. '* !II > .$lIftlNE t.j:'\U . ~.:,_ e" t III -e -.. .." 51 ~r; m.. .l I II I ~_.-...-_._- I:"}l~ U'" ....." ~ !,..ioNM 83568. ~(I- -~2 .-.'~, h!"~, ~,~:: . ':::::::;:::;:=:::.:,,-:..-=.":' . . .~.~. -'--'-"'-" r..............., :~' ~"~iI'"'t ....~:.. I iil,1 ;1.1 i~~-'" . ": .~ . ,~, ... ~ ...~;JI!-....'L~S "'$INMI__"" :a: :r~.~.... "I: .. oI:~ rn-tSt $. ~... <II Iii sf 19 ,,,,~:-..."';,",,,, ~... :r - ~ ! -.' . ., ~j~_" ~.. "(. ., ._'" 9 ~~~1.Jm r\ 11< ... . s. -:r- 45 t .... ~ ~ I -..."'.... ..-. .' ,uno:, .J'r.r - :. ~ ~L . 74 I --",-,,-I ;I~~ ..., ~iOIIII:_M""'__ " :;; '" ....J ~ ~~~ I iI. , ft .J ......,....: - w ~ 1J,: "~I_ <II ~x.,j ~I ~ ~.:J I t;; .. '-iU"!.f .I' '" CIa" PI II {,. vi n I · . , . , _1~.~~~,lI,i~ '. ", 1"; 'J'-"~"'" ~ ,,~ .../F ~/I~.~.~: ",; I~r ' <..;" u-," ~ !.:: .. "" /." ~"" .., , N'l'f\OX.ICALEINMlLEI! I .. 72 r..... ~ l:il.. tit .. . J~.tL I:JU Till ___ ~~~i~!7 ~-~~., .,,', i- ~ .;.. f": 15 ~ = .., .." (t' .:: r ~ .. n; " GI'" ::::lil 3 .. 1 ~ ~ : i~~' ' D ,..// .'" ,'~'. :...:~ .~" ,'.._.......,.. . #-"':." '. ..... ~.. ~/; =1 ' :'):~ " n. r ; _ 1If. M .T;~~II::;-t :; ""'("K . . ! "'l,..... ...... .. . __ ~ _" ';.';;' ~ . ,d. j~ ill Federal Way Public Schools 110 ~ ~. . ...,. ~~ 1 .~. ; ,~~ l~ ~'4 ~ i, to EvetyStudent,aRe:lder ; ~rf", "'lTON' .'. l;:.:;.:Ii r:,- i~:' : . . .......Savl_ !......... ., K.... c.!..~... ____... ""I i ..... ~ 945-1000 -~"YI,IIIIITI MIi.TON I PIIf(l8Toun Flit! ~ A.,.ta,om~ II E F (; ..-r...... H - FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENT A TION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 2006 through 2012 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FfE) capacity is based on: . The number of classrooms available in each school . Any special requirements at each school In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classoom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students. For grades 3-5 the target is 25 students. In sixth and seventh grade the students are scheduled with block instruction and see only two teachers for core curriculum. Teachers at this level see 60 students per day. At eighth grade, the teachers will see 90 students per day. For grades 9-12 the target class size is 26 students. In the 2004/05 school year, all of the 23 elementary schools offer at least one all day Kindergarten. This program does have capacity impacts, as the classroom is only available for one session of Kindergarten for the full day. 12 FEDERAL WA Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount PrE School Name Headcount PrE Adelaide 456 436 Il1ahee 799 807 Brigadoon 510 490 Kilo 799 807 Camelot 347 327 Lakota 750 758 Enterprise 404 384 Sacajawea 774 782 Green Gables 432 412 Saghalie 694 701 Lake Dolloff 490 47Q Sequovah 700 707 Lake Grove 424 404 Totem 735 742 Lakeland 450 430 Federal Way Public Academy 212 214 Mark Twain 465 444 2006 TOTAL 5,463 5518 Meredith Hill 437 417 Mirror Lake 379 359 ~*Middle School Average I 875 I 884 I Nautilus 475 455 Olympic View 424 404 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING Panther Lake 437 417 PROGRAM CAPACITY Rainier View 445 425 Sherwood Forest 494 474 School Name Headcount FIE Silver Lake 502 482 Decatur 1,269 1343 Star Lake 474 454 Federal Way 1,456 1541 Sunnycrest 424 404 Thomas Jefferson 1,435 1519 Twin Lakes 450 430 Todd Beamer 1,523 1612 Valhalla 477 457 Truman High School 200 200 Wildwood 445 425 Federal Way Public Academy 133 133 W oodmont 375 355 2006 TOTAL 6,016 6,348 2006 TOTAL 10,216 9,755 I*Senior High Average I 1,421 I 1,504 I ~Elementary Average I 444 I 424 l AL TERNA TIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FIE Merit School I 16 I 16 Notes: 2005 TOTAL I 16 I 16 * Federal Way Public Academy capacity is not used in calculated average. * Truman High School capacity is not used in calculated average. 13 . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 14 -.---- FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPIT AL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT SENIOR HIGHS NON NON INSTI<.u(:TIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL IN~,RUCTIONAL Adelaide 3 Decatur 5 Brigadoon 1 Federal Way 1 Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson 3 Enterprise 3 Green Gables 1 TOTAL 9 Lake Dolloff 2 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 PORTABLES LOCATED Mirror Lake 4 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Nautilus 1 Olympic View 2 IMOT I 1 I Panther Lake 3 TDC 3 Raini" View 3 TOTAL: 4 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 2 2 Sunnycrest 1 1 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla 1 1 Sherwood Forest 1 Wildwood 4 Woodmont 3 Total 1 TOTAL 54 6 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAl, IN~"l'R(J(,i'I()NAI_ Illahee 5 ~~ 7 Lakota 3 Sacajawea 4 Saghalie 4 Totem 5 Merit 2 30 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master™ software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The report substantiated that for next year, Federal Way expects little or no growth. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5- 19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24,000 and 26,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from four pennitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future. 17 . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = .5 FTE; Middle School FTE=.99 Headcount; Senior High FTE = .945Headcount) Total K -12 Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School Senior High FTE Change 2000 1999-00 11,641 5,156 4,380 21,176 2001 2000-01 11,640 5,305 4,338 21,283 0.5% 2002 200 I -02 11,498 5,337 4,467 21,302 0.1% 2003 2002-03 11,202 5,454 4,437 21,093 -1.0% 2004 * 2003-04 9,127 5,524 6,408 21,059 -0.2% 2005 2004-05 9,164 5,473 6,515 21,152 0.4% 2006 B2005-06 9,119 5,410 6,629 21,158 0.0% 2007 P2006-07 9,203 5,282 6,744 21,229 0.3% 2008 PlO07-08 9,444 5,206 6,844 21,494 1.2% 2009 PlO08-09 9,631 5,217 6,828 21,676 0.8% 2010 P2009-10 9,765 5,283 6,813 21,861 0.8% 2011 PlOlO-l1 9,912 5,393 6,695 21,999 0.6% 2012 P2011-12 10,021 5,500 6,681 22,202 0.9% * New Configuration Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 .--.".- --,,'. -"..'.' .-- ,....,"'u. Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 23,000 1.5% 22,000 1.0% 21,000 ~ 0.5% 5 20,000 Gl l.l 'C III III III :! 19,000 0.0% e l.l ..... .s Gl .c 'if. .g 18,000 0 -0.5% 17,000 -1.0% 16,000 15,000 -1.5% "&\ , ~ ~ ~ ~ % '%\ -0 -0 -0 '% -0 ~ ~\ 'i::l ~ ? ~o u>~ \ ~ --0 ~ ~ '?> l:& ;:..>. u> ~ ? ~ ;:..>. \9 0 ? School Year i-iiiIIiii'FTE " ~n'_'. -+- Percent of Change -..-... 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL F ACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CAPACITY School Year 2005/06 2006107 2007/08 2008/09 2009/1 0 20010/11 20011/12 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 21,011 21,011 20,985 20,959 n:eCAPACITY 20 930 21 611 21,585 21,559 Add or subtract changes to capacity ..".... . .,...... . ",..... . ."..... . ........ . ."..... . ..,..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,...... . ,....... . Special Education Changes :<(2 tir .: ,(26) ':(26) Sequoyah Middle School .::161::: Increase Capacity at Federal Way High Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 21,011 20,985 20,959 20,933 Ad. .ted Program FTE aci 21,611 21,585 21,559 21,533 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 21,158 21,229 21,494 21,676 21,861 21,999 22,202 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAFTE) 288 288 288 288 288 288 288 :B4sicFTEEnrolhnentwithout Intemet Academy 20,870 20,941 21,206 21,388 ..... :,~l.$~,..".'. ... ~h'IJ.". "21'lti \:,} :. i"',,. SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAMFTE CAPACITY RELOCAT ABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,325 2,525 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,462 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity Add New Portable Capacity ZOO: 200 Deduct Portable Ca acity Ad. ortableCa ity 2,525 2.725 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3,266 3,369 3,078 2~ 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL F ACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CAPACITY School Year 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 20011/12 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 10,216 10,190 10,164 10,138 10,112 10,112 10,112 FTE CAPACITY 9755 9,729 9,703 9,677 '\"'8f\\"" \, ^ ,.,1, / !,1i<::::~ \~.,,'\/',: ..,.. ,..........,.... ... ,.......,.'.... 1. Special Education Changes >:t26L>::(26) : :::(2(j): ::::(26): 10,138 10,112 10,112 10,112 10,112 9,617 9,6$1 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 9,199 9,203 9,444 9,631 9,765 2. Internet Academy <AAFTE) 32 32 32 32 32 BaSic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academ 9167 9.171 9412 9,599 ,'.733/\,' SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 Add/Subtract portable capacity 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 13S0" "'''IJ ,':, '':"': ',t' ,,", " . ";' \' .> SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,911 1 82 1,615 1,40Z ':');jl~" NOTES: 1. Add Special Education and ECEAP Programs This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated. 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Re1ocatab1e Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL F ACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CAPACITY School Year 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 200911 0 20010/11 20011/12 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 4,763 5,470 5,470 5,470 FTBCAPACITY 4811 5,518 5,518 5,518 1. Sequoyah Middle School 7~7:: 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,410 5,282 5,206 5,217 5,283 5,393 5,500 2. Internet Academy (AAFTE) 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 aatic m'l;molbnent withQut Intemet.Academy 5,318 5,190 5,114 5,125 ,'.' $~1,9t.,' ,,5.~1 .','..:$,~t I"~ ,:"""',,, ",' ','" SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add new portable capacity " , A. .ustedPortable Caci 750 750 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCAT ABLE 4. CAPACITY 902 1,030 1,106 1,095 ~~W ,~1'. ' '.:Ila',' NOTES: 1. Sequoyah Middle School to Open 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Re1ocatab1e Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 4. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 22 . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL F ACILITES PLAN CAP ACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CAP ACITY School Year 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 20011/12 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 FTECAPACITY 6,364 6,364 6364 6,364 Add or subtract changes in capacity Increase Capacity at Federal Way High School ,".".'0........'. :::>8 0..<< 6,032 6,032 6,364 6,364 ENROLLMENT Basic PTE Enrollment 6,629 6,744 6,844 6,828 6,813 1. Internet Academy (AAPTE) 164 164 164 164 164 awe Ed without Internet A&adew 6,465 6,580 6,680 6664 ',.,6.{;49:,:.: SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Current Portable Capacity 225 425 625 625 625 625 625 3. Add new portable capacity ::200: :zo.O: : ..',.,.......... Ad.usted PortableCa acity " ' " , 425 625 625 625 625, SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 4., CAPACITY 8 77 (23 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 3. Add Portable Capacity 4. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students. This would provide program for additional high school students. 23 . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County. the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single- family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units which were constructed in the last five (5) years. The multi-family yield is derived from an average of other King County school districts. - IMP ACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the hnpact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. ~ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. ~ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 45); this is a negotiated purchase price. Plan Year 2006 Plan Year 2005 Collection Year 2006 Collection Year 2005 Single Family Units $3393. $2868 Multi-Famil Units $ 895. $905. 24 _..,~- _c~om~~~~oooo~~o _C~owo ~<J) Nm~~W~~OONm ~<J) ~o -O~O~Nm~N~~~mN -O~O~W :J~~~~~OmN~W~ :J~~M ~W~oo6o~o~oo~ ~W~oo ~ ~ fC5m~~~oomo~~oo fC5~M ~~u*~m~ffl~g~~~ ~~u~~ ~:J~~~~~~N~~~~ R:J~q~ ~w~oooooooooo mW~oo (/J (/J o 0 o 0 ~C5~M~Woo~m~00~ ~c5~~ (/J~-~~m~~cJ;~~gg (/J~u~m <J):Jg~~~~~N~~N~ ~:JGqq ~W~OOOOOOOOOO ~W~OO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~- SC5~~00~~oom~Nm ~i1 SC5~~ i~u~~~N~;oo~~~ ~~o~M E:JG~~~~~~ffl~~~ E:JGq~ <J)w~oooooooooo <J)w~oo j m w ~ -~ -~ ~ oaw o~w ~ ~~c ~xc ~ ~~~~om~m~mm~~~ ~~~MO~ ~ E.2:J ~ ~ ~ E.2:J~"""N tl en :J~en ::sien < ~ = Z(/J = Z(/J ~. < = = - ~ ~ ~ ....:l >< C': 0 C': 0 < '" l-. -0 l-. -0 ~ z~ ~ o~~ ~ o~~ ~ 00 ~ ~QC ~ ~OC < ~~ r~ ~(/J<J)~~m~NO~~~m~ r~ n(/J<J)oo~~ U <I'<< '-' E<J)~ ......(\J ~ m '-' E<J)~ ...... ~ ~~ ~ ~:J _ ~:J ~ ~~ 5 i~w 5 ~~w ~ ~z 1 ~ 1 ~ m ....:l DO ~ ~ N o E-""" r:Jj V'J o ZtJ ~ _:::.. ~ _:::.. == ~~ :;a Oa~ ~ Olii~ u ~ c ~-C = ......C ~ ~G ~ <J)c<J)ooo 0000 N mO C': <J)c<J)~o~ U E-Z ~ ~<J)~......~~m~N~N~~~ ~ n<J)~N"""M ., tI) 0 ~ E E oS .... E E oS _ :J <J) ".. ~ ::s <J) .... ~ u ~ Zww ~ zmw ~ ~ ~ ~ >- z ~ ->- ->- ::: 0=!2 o=w ~ ~Ei:: ...Ec <J) _ <J) - ~ W ~~=ooooooooooo n~=m~w ~ E~~ E~;N M ~ :J~O ::s~c ~ z~ z~ ""' >. ~ ~=w ~-w ~ E Q ~ E <J)~.E 0 N <J)al.!: n~-~"""~ooooooooNw~~ ~~-ooo E<J)~M~~NMW~~N~~ E<J)~ :J~~ ::so~ Z .e z .5 (/J (/J c c ~ (f)<J) .2 ~.2 Z - z- UJ ~ <J) l!! UJ l!! ~~ ou; ~ _ ~ ~ _ ~ D..c;9!. -gLU .:.:. ....J S<J) D.. G<J) OR~c02 ~ ~ 00 o~ !o mro~~~~ c..':':'w2~c m.:.:.&~- >w<J)~~~~Eg_~ <J) >j~ ; UJ<J)':':'(f)~I~~~(\jO ~ UJ<J)~>- ~ o = ~ -~ 'u.... c...n <J) c.. :J C ..c: :J 5..c:<J)(f)(\j ~~..c: ~ -<J) - ct~t~<J)>:Q..c:o(lj(f) w _~ (/J -o-:J<J) 0__ (Ij.- OZIffiO~I~50 <J)~ .-.. 0 ~~MMNN~~OO ~oE oooooooooS ....Jm . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost! Cost! Acreage Acre CapacIty SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0.00 ...,.....................J9.. 417 0.3030 0,0929 $0 $0 .................................. ....................,............ ................................. ................................. Middle School 21.80 $87,747 921 0.2013 0.0410 $418 $85 .................................. ...,.............................. ................................. ................................. ................................. Sr High 1.20 $173,833 133 0.2013 0.0628 $316 $98 TOTAL $734 $184 School Construction Cost: Student Student % Perm Fac.! Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost! Cost! Total So Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 96.60% ..........................!9.. 417 0.3030 0.0929 $0 $0 .................................. ................................. ................................. Middle School 96.60% .....~.~.~.~?~.~:.?:?.~.. 921 0.2013 0.0410 $3,875 $789 .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. Sr High 96,60% $28,968,637 933 0,2013 0,0628 $6,038 $1,884 TOTAL $9,913 $2,673 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student % Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost! Cost! Total Sq Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 3.40% $0 25 0,3030 0.0929 $0 $0 .................................. ..........................$0.. ................................. .....................,........... ................................. Middle School 3.40% 25 0,2013 0,0410 $0 $0 .................................. ..............$.S2j:5'l" ..................,.............. ................................. ................................. Sr High 3.40% 25 0,2013 0.0628 $22 $7 TOTAL $22 $7 State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Boeck Cost! Sq.FL State Factor Factor Cosli Cost! Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $129,81 90 0,00% 0,3030 0.0929 $0 $0 ::::::::::::::F~~IC .................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. Middle School 117 0,00% 0,2013 0.0410 $0 $0 ................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. New Sr High $129.81 130 59,97% 0.2013 0.0628 $2,037 $636 Total $2,037 $636 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (April 2005) ......E~.1!.?~?........ ......J??.~}~.1......... Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2005) 4.57% 4.57% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling ::::~:!:;jj:~;~:gi?::::: .................................. ......~~~.~:;?~~........ Y ears Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate ..........$"1:04........... .................................. $1.04 Present Value of Revenue Stream $1,845 $438 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ 734 $ 184 Permanent Facility Cost $ 9,913 $ 2,673 Temporary Facility Cost $ 22 $ 7 State Match Credit $ (2.037) $ (636) Tax Payment Credit $ (1,845) $ (438) Sub. Total $ 6,787 $ 1,790 50% Local Share $ 3,393 $ 895 IIImpact Fee $ 3,393 $ 89511 26 - . . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2005 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2006 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2005 Plan and the 2006 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX- YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2006/2012 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENT A TION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2005/06 school year. Middle School capacity changes reflect the opening of Sequoyah Middle School. Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2006 through 2012. Enrollment history and projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. 27 . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 25. SITE ACQUISITION COSTS The negotiated purchase price for the Todd Beamer High School site was $80,000 per acre. This is the base line cost for acreage for Sequoyah Middle SchooL The assessed valuation for the Federal Way Public Academy land was $521,000 at the time of purchase. The calculated cost per acre in the impact fee calculation is a weighted calculation using the $80,000 per acre baseline cost and the assessed valuation at the time of purchase for the Federal Way Public Academy. Federal Way Public Academy is a 3-acre site. The grade span for this facility is grades 6-10. Middle school accounts for 60% of the cost; senior high is 40%. Sequoyah: 20 x $80,000 = $1,600,000 FWPA $ 312.900 (60 % of $521.500. 1.8 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $1,912,900 Cost/Acreage $1,912,900/21.8 = $87,747 cost per acre Senior High FWPA $ 208.600 (40% of $521,500. 1.2 acres of 3 acre parcel) Cost/Acreage $ 208,600/1.2 = $173,833 cost per acre SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The cost for Federal Way Public Academy (exclusive of land) is $4,921,594. The Federal Way Public Academy costs are split 60% to middle school and 40% to senior high in the impact fee calculation. Middle school construction costs = 60% of $4,921,594 $ 2,952,956 FWP A $15,400,000 Sequoyah Total Cost $18,352,956 The total cost for replacing Federal Way High School is projected to be $81m. The capacity of the school would increase from approximately 1500 to 2400 students. The Impact Fee calculation used one-third, $27m as the basis for capacity increases at high school. High school construction costs = 40% of $4,921,594 $ 1,9682,637 FWPA $27,000,000 Federal Way High Total Cost $28,968,637 28 > . .- FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 IMPACT FEE ~ Fromffo Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.32 to 96.60% Report #3 aSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 3.68 to 3.40% Updated portable inventory Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $114.88 to $129.81 Change per aSPI State Match 59.97 % (No Change) Average Assessed Value SFR- Per Puget Sound Educational $213,859 to $224,943 Service District (ESD 121) MFR- $44,571 to $53,384 Capital Bond Interest Rate 4.35% to 4.57% Market Rate Popertyr Tax Levy Rate $1.40 to $1.04 King County Treasury Division Square Foot Allocations Legislative Change (Effective Elementary 80 to 90 sq ft 2006/07) Middle School 110 to 117 sq ft High School 120 to 130 sq ft Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .313 8 to.3030 Middle School .1632 to .2013 High School .1695 to .2013 Multi-Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .119 to .0929 Middle School .042 to .0410 High School .053 to .0628 29