No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUTC PKT 08-04-2008 r OR'!' '~'AL' '\AI.': City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee August 4, 2008 5:30 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers MEETING AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 21, 2008 3. PUBLIC COMMENT (3 minutes) 4. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Action Lee/5 min. B. 2008 Asphalt Overlay- Project Acceptance and Retainage Release Action Mulkey/5 min. C. Status Update - 2008 Planning Commission and Long Range Planning Work Program Action Clark/IS min. 5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS 6. ADJOURN Committee Members Linda Kachmar, Chair Jim Ferre// Dini Duclos City StatT Cary M. Roe, P.E.. Assistant City Manager/Emergency Manager Darlene LeMaster, Administrative Assistantll 253-835-2701 G:iLUTClLUTC Agendas and Summaries 1008i8-04-08 LUTe Agenda. doc City of Federal Way City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee July 21, 2008 5:30 PM City Hall City Council Chambers MEETING MINUTES In attendance: Committee Chair Linda Kochmar, Council Member Jim Ferrell, Committee Member Dini Duclos, Council Member Jeanne Burbidge, Mayor Jack Dovey, Assistant City Manager/Chief Operations Officer/Emergency Manager Cary Roe, City Staff Attorney Monica Buck, Director of Community Development Services Greg Fewins, Acting Deputy Public Works Director Marwan Salloum, Deputy Public Works Director Ken Miller, and Administrative Assistant II Darlene LeMaster. 1. CALL TO ORDER Committee Chair Kochmar called the meeting to order at 5:30 PM. All members were present. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The June 16,2008 LUTC meeting minutes were approved. Moved: Duclos Seconded: Ferrell Passed: Unanimously, 3-0 3. PUBLIC COMMENT The following public comment was received: Nancy Combs, 30441 21" Ave SW, Federal Way - Ms. Combs commented on the needfor afour-way stop at 21s, Ave SW and SW 304,h St. Bob Kellogg, Federal Way Kiwanis - Mr. Kellogg has recently put out signs for the Kiwanis Salmon Bake. He now realizes that staff has not removed these signs; rather, the signs have been stolen. Of the 50 signs put up, only 10 remain. Mr. Kellogg wants to know if there is a provision in place that protects groups that put out signs as a service to the community. How does the City deal with sign theft? ACM Roe will follow up with Mr. Kellogg and give assistance. Committee Chair Kochmar recommended and Committee Member Duclos supported that a letter to the editor be published concerning the legality of taking signs. Mayor Dovey asked if all signs that appear to be in the right of way are removed. ACM Roe explained that staff removes only those signs that are without a doubt, in the public right of way. Any signs that are questionable are left. Janet Holmes, Federal Way- Ms. Holmes wanted to voice her opinion about the needfor afour-way stop at 21" Ave SW and SW 304,h Street. Ms. Holmes primary concern is for the safety of the children of that neighborhood, walking to andfrom school. Tom Heunisch, S 293rd St, Federal Way - Mr. Heunisch would like the City to take over the maintenance of private storm systems. On a separate note, Mr. Heunisch has noticed that signs have been dumped down the slope off of 1" Ave Sand SW 292"'" Street. 4. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Kim Short Plat Ken Miller provided background information on this item. Committee Member Ferrell asked about the status of installing colored slats in the chain-link fence and if Mr. Madison had been informed of the progress. What, if any, was his response? Mr. Miller answered that although he hasn't spoken to Mr. Madison directly, Mr. Madison has been informed and is satisfied with the outcome. The detention pond is complete with the exception of the slats. ACM Roe confmned Mr. Madison's knowledge of the detention pond completion and the black slats to be installed in the fencing. There was no action taken. This item was for information only. G:ILUTCILUTC Agendas and Summaries 2008\7-21-08 Minutes.doc Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 2 July 21, 2008 B. Sign Code Greg Fewins provided background information on this item. Committee Member Ferrell asked for confIrmation on the following: Signs placed in advance of 30 days prior to or 5 days after a public event would be illegal? Do people need permission from private property owners to place signs? Mr. Fewins answered "yes" to both questions. Committee Member Ferrell felt it would be a hardship to those needing to get permission from private property owners. Committee Member Duclos asked if staked signs would be prohibited in the public right of way. Mr. Fewins answered, "yes". Committee Chair Kochmar suggested organizing a stakeholder group. Although Mayor Dovey would prefer to really look into the sign code issue and understand everything before the Council acts upon it, Committee Member Duclos feels that we should make administrative changes now. Committee Member Ferrell said the bottom line to this issue is really placing signs in the public right of way, and the right of way indirectly belongs to the people of the City. Committee Member Ferrell feels that signage should be allowed in the public right of way, based on reasonable limitations; to do otherwise would infringe on people's freedom of speech. Committee Member Duclos commented that a precedent has been established to put signs in the right of way and feels an obligation to answer the public. Councilmember Burbidge is in favor of banners over the public right of way and also feels an obligation to fmd a solution acceptable to the public. Committee Member Ferrell wants to really examine what other cities do for signage in the right of way. A few minutes was spent looking over an exhibit of the agenda item (provided by Sam Pace) titled "Regulation of Residential (Single-Family) Real Estate Signs". Committee Member Ferrell inquired as to why staked signs would not be allowed in the public right of way. Both Mr. Fewins and ACM Roe commented that there is irrigation along the right of way and stake signs can puncture the irrigation lines. Mr. Fewins added that A-frame signs are being considered for placement in the public right of way, while stake signs would be allowable on private property. Public Comment: Nancy Combs, 30441 21" Ave SW, Federal Way - Ms. Combs commented that she does not like the clutter of signs. Also, what about garage sale signs? Mr. Fewins answered that garage sale signs must also abide by the sign code or they risk being removed Marilyn Gates, 31604 7,h PI SW, Federal Way - Ms. Gates re-read her suggestions, previously presented at both Council and LUTC meetings. Sam Pace, 29839 154,h Ave SE, Kent - Mr. Pace stated his opinion that signs should be allowed in the public right of way and supported his opinion by referencing case law. Mr. Pace also noted some other points: · Realtors are allowed up to ten open house signs; however, through restrictions, most of these signs are taken away. · The City should not require a sign permit for signage in the right of way. Mr. Pace claims that no other city in King Co. requires a permit. · Mr. Pace is in favor of signage in the right of way between sunrise and sunset, because that is when an open house would be occurring anyway. · The City could be liable if they were to remove signs from private property. Mr. Fewins continued by presenting staffs recommendations. Mr. Fewins also asked for clarification from the Committee to make sure staff was proceeding with this item as directed. After much conversation surrounding the many possible routes to take, it was decided to make administrative changes now and draft a sign code amendment allowing for signage in the public right of way, following reasonable guidelines and/or restrictions. Committee Chair Kochmar suggested a public stakeholder group might include representation from the Federal Way Chamber of Commerce, service club members (ie. Kiwanis), South King Co. Realtors, etc. Mr. Fewins asked what should be the priority of drafting a sign code amendment as this will impact the 2008 work plan of the Planning Commission. The Committee directed Mr. Fewins to mover the sign code amendment to the top of the priority list of the Planning Commission's 2008 Work Plan. G:\LUTClLUTC Agendas and Summaries 2008\7-21-08 Minutes.doc Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 3 July 21, 2008 The committee made two separate motions: 1. Forward the "LUTe Administrative Changes" as presented by staff and further explore general access to the general right of way with reasonable restrictions to the August 5, 2008 Council Business Agenda for approval. 2. Direct staff to prepare a code amendment to allow A-frame signage in the public right of way as presented by staff in the "Summary of Performance Standards" to the August 5, 2008 Council Business Agenda for approval. Moved: Duclos Seconded: Ferrell Passed: Unanimously, 3-0 Committee PASSED Option 1 to the August 5, 2008 City Council Business Agenda for approval. C. Steel Lake Maintenance North Parking Lot Paving Proiect Award Ken Miller provided background information on this item. There was no discussion. Moved: Duclos Seconded: Ferrell Passed: Unanimously, 3-0 Committee PASSED Option 1 to the August 5, 2008 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. D. Department of Ecology Interlocal Agreement for Sea Lettuce Removal in Dumas Bay Ken Miller provided background information on this item. Committee Member Duclos inquired as to how the sea lettuce is removed. Mr. Miller responded that this is a pilot project. There are a couple of methods for collecting. The sea lettuce will be removed and studied for possible other uses, such as fuel. Athough a collection method has not been fmalized, the methods being considered will have the least impact to the environment as possible. Mr. Miller added that staff is monitoring Dumas Bay on a regularly scheduled basis for increasing amounts of sea lettuce as well as odor. Council Member Burbidge thanked staff for their efforts in securing funding for this project and asked that Council be kept updated as this project continues. Moved: Duclos Seconded: Ferrell Passed: Unanimously, 3-0 Committee PASSED Option 1 to the August 5, 2008 City Council Public Hearing Agenda for approval. E. Private Storm Drainage Improvemetns and Maintenance Responsibility Ken Miller provided background information on this item. Mr. Miller stated that there is not much information available on private residential stormwater systems. Committee Chair Kochmar asked if private systems could be dedicated to the City as a way to be maintained by the City. Committee Member Ferrell voiced that the liability and exposure of this idea could be a concern. Public Comment: Tom Heunisch,S 293rd St, Federal Way - Mr. Heunisch asked if the City would consider taking over private stormwater systems if they met certain criteria. Mr. Heunisch also feels there is argument for this from a taxpayer's standpoint as well. In the case of his particular stormwater system, the system has been recently serviced and paid for by the property owners. If the City took over maintenance, the cost for annual upkeep would be minimal. Committee Member Ferrell asked for specifics on cost. Mr. Heunisch said they paid between $2K and $3K to recently have the system serviced. Future maintenance would be between $600- $700 annually. Committee Kochmar asked staff about having residents contract with the City for private system maintenance. Mr. Miller responded that the City contracts out itself for services as the City does not have its own equipment. Mr. Miller will follow up with Mr. Heunisch and get contact information for contractors providing stormwater maintenance services to him. Committee Members Ferrell and Kochmar asked staff to work with Mr. Heunisch to help resolve his problem. Committee Member Duclos recused herself. Moved: Kochmar Seconded: Ferrell Passed: Unanimously, 2-0 Duclos recused. Committee approved Option 1. The City will not change its existing policy concerning the maintenance of private storwater systems. This item does not go forward. G:\LUTClLUTC Agendas and Summaries 2008\7-21-08 Minutes.doc Land Useffransportation Committee Page 4 July 21, 2008 5. FUTURE MEETING The next regularly scheduled LUTC meeting will be held August 4,2008 at 5:30 PM. 6. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 7:51 PM. G:\LUTC\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2008\7-21-08 Minutes.doc COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 4, 2008 ITEM #: _M'_M_"'__M"'M"'_M'M'_M_.__.._.,""..._M"_'_M__'___,___.____._.___.____...__""__.___._..__._.____.___.._.--.---.----- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECf: EAGLE MANOR PRELIMINARY PLAT ApPLICATION, FILE 06-106512-00-SU POLICY QUESTION: SHALL THE PROPOSED 12-LOT EAGLE MANOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION BE APPROVED? COMMITTEE: LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (LUTe) MEETING DATE: August 4, 2008 CATEGORY: [8J Consent o City Council Business o Ordinance [8J Resolution o o Public Hearing Other STAFF REPORT By: David Associate Planner DEPT: Community Development Project Description: Preliminary plat for the subdivision of an undeveloped 3.11 acre parcel into 12 single family lots. Zoning is RS 7.2. Attachments: Eagle Manor Hearing Examiner recommendation dated July 14, 2008; Preliminary plat staff report dated June 13, 2008, with exhibits including preliminary plat map; and draft City Council Resolution for Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat. Options Considered: I. Adopt the Hearing Examiner Recommendation and approve the Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Resolution. 2. Reject the Hearing Examiner Recommendation. 3. City Council may adopt its own recommendations and approve the Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Resolution. ..____..i'--.__...f.!!Yf..l:l.I;!'.t.~il_may_.ll~.'?~~_.l:l~.r.~_~'?~~.'.!~_lI:~i.l:l.'.!~..lI:'.1_~_~i.~.I!p.!.<?~~_the ~lI:g!~M.l!l.l:l!. Pr~!.!!!1.i.'.!~..!'!.lI:!.!3:.~~.1:!.t!.()~_...._____..____....__...__.._..___ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council approval of the Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat resolution, based on the findings, conclusions, and recommendation ofthe Federal Way Hearing Examiner (Option #1). CITY MANAGER ApPROVAL: ~ DIRECTOR ApPROVAL: 'JZ- Committee Council Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: "1 move Option #1 to the Full City Council, for the August J 9, 2008, City Council consent agenda. " Dini Duclos, Member Linda Kochmar, Chair Jim Ferrell, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "1 move adoption of the Hearing Examiner recommendations and approval of the Eagle Manor Plat Resolution. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: o APPROVED o DENIED o TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION o MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED - 02/06/2006 COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # Doc. J.D. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING EAGLE MANOR PRELIMINARY PLAT, FEDERAL WAY FILE NO. 06-106512-00 SUo WHEREAS, the owner, Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC, applied to the City of Federal Way for preliminary plat approval to subdivide certain real property known as Eagle Manor, and consisting of 3.11 acres into twelve (12) single-family residential lots located at the southwest comer of 21st Ave SW & SW 344th St; and WHEREAS, on September 15, 2007, an Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the Director of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A), Chapter 43.21 C; RCW, and WHEREAS, the Federal Way Hearing Examiner on June 13, 2008, held a public hearing concerning Eagle Manor preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, following the conclusion of said hearing, on July 14,2008, the Federal Way Hearing Examiner issued a written Report and Recommendation containing findings and conclusions, and recommending approval of Eagle Manor preliminary plat subject to conditions set forth therein; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council has jurisdiction and authority pursuant to Section 20- 127 of the Federal Way City Code to approve, deny, or modify a preliminary plat and/or its conditions; and WHEREAS, on August 4, 2008, the City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee considered the record and the Hearing Examiner recommendation on Eagle Manor preliminary plat, pursuant to Chapter 20 of Federal Way City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicable City codes, and voted to forward a recommendation for approval of the proposed Eagle Manor preliminary plat to the full City Council, with no changes to the Hearing Examiner recommendation; and Doc. 1.0. WHEREAS, on August 19, 2008, the City Council considered the record and the Hearing Examiner recommendation on Eagle Manor preliminary plat, pursuant to Chapter 20 of Federal Way City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicable City codes. Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Adoption of Findings of Fact and Conclusions. 1. The findings of fact and conclusions of the Hearing Examiner's July 14,2008 Report and Recommendation, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference, are hereby adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Federal Way City Council. Any finding deemed to be a conclusion, and any conclusion deemed to be a finding, shall be treated as such. 2. Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions m the Staff Report and Hearing Examiner's recommendation, and conditions of approval as established therein, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary waste, parks and recreation, play grounds, schools and schools grounds, and all other relevant facts as are required by City code and state law, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. 3. The public use and interest will be served by the preliminary plat approval granted herein. Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing Examiner and findings and conclusions contained therein as adopted by the City Council immediately above, Eagle Manor preliminary plat, Federal Way File No. 06-106512-00 SU, is hereby approved, subject to conditions as contained in the July 14,2008, Report and Recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing Examiner (Exhibit A). Doc. 1.0. Section 3. Conditions of Approval Integral. The conditions of approval of the preliminary plat are all integral to each other with respect to the City Council finding that the public use and interest will be served by the platting or subdivision of the subject property. Should any court having jurisdiction over the subject matter declare any of the conditions invalid, then, in said event, the proposed preliminary plat approval granted in this resolution shall be deemed void, and the preliminary plat shall be remanded to the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner to review the impacts of the invalidation of any condition or conditions and conduct such additional proceedings as are necessary to assure that the proposed plat makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare and other factors as required by RCW Chapter 58.17 and applicable City ordinances, rules, and regulations, and forward such recommendation to the City Council for further action. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 7. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. Doc. J.D. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, THIS _ DAY ,2008. OF CiTY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, JACK DOVEY ATTEST: CITY CLERK, LAURA HA THAW A Y ApPROVED As To FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED By THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION No. Doc. 1.0. rt5)~((;fEaw~~ lUll JUl J 4 L1lO8 Il!J City Clerks Office City 0' federal Way BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF FEDE L. { ( i) <-~) 7 it OJ Phil Olbrechts, Hearing ExaminerD..-e.-t'.....-tS/IJ'^ 4 (}~-~ c>>. Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LA WAND RECOl\1fMENDA TION RE: 08-106512-00-5 U INTRODUCTION The Applicant requests approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide 3_11 acres into 12 single- family residential lots. The Hearing Examiner recommends approval subject to conditions recommended by staff ORAL TESTIMONY Associate Planner, David Lee, summarized the staff report, including the application and staff recommendation, for the benefit of the public attending the hearing. Ron Hawkins, whose property borders the south side of the project site, testified that the elimination of existing natural boundaries between the two properties will cause an influx of transients and wild animals onto his property. He added that a fence barrier between the properties is needed to keep his children and dogs from wondering into and exploring the subject site. Melinda Diamond, who lives to the west of the project site, expressed her concerns with the timing of the project given the conditions of the housing market She cited examples of projects nearby that clear the land only to allow it to sit barren without any development but for a model home that becomes a target for vandals. Staff explained that the city cannot require fencing under current code, and that would be a private matter between the parties. He added that any clearing of the property at the preliminary plat stage would be limited to minimum needed to add the necessary improvements. Applicant testified that a fence barrier would be incompatible with the silt fencing required; however, eventually perimeter fencing would most likely be installed_ EXHIBITS See list of exhibits on p. II of the June 13, 2008, staff report prepared by Associate Planner David Lee. In addition, the fol/owing exhibit was presented and entered into the record during public hearing: Exhibit 14 - City's Powerpoint presentation slides. (PA070066J.DOC; 1113041900000I1 Preliminary Plat Recommendation Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation Page I of 8 FINDINGS OF FACT Procedural: I. Applicant. Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC. 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the application at 2:00 p.m. at Federal Way City Hall on June 26, 2008. Substantive: 3. SitelProposal Description. Applicant proposes to subdivide 3.11 acres of currently undeveloped land into 12 residential single-family lots, each a minimum of 7,200 square feet. Street improvements, water, sewer, utilities, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements will be installed to service the plat. The subject property is located on the southwest comer of 21st Avenue SW & SW 344th Street. The site is currently partially wooded with thick shrubbery. A mixture of conifer and deciduous trees are present on the property. There are a total of 36 significant trees on the subject property. The Applicant has proposed to remove 18 of these trees from the interior of the site for infrastructure. City policy and FWCC Section 20-179 state that existing mature vegetation shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. There are no wetlands on site or within 200 feet of the subject property. No wetlands or surface waters are known to exist on or around the property, and no wetlands or streams are identified on the City's environmentally sensitive areas maps. No wildlife species recognized as priority species are known to inhabit the site or the nearby vicinity. With the exception of lots 7 and 8, all of the proposed lots are of rectangular shape. The subdivision is accessed through 22nd Place SW, which connects to SW 344th Street. All lots ace then accessed directly by SW 344th Court. All building setback Jines (BSBL) are depicted on the preliminary plat map, and each lot contains an adequate building area. A 20- foot-wide storm drainage easement runs east to west along the northern property line. The buildable areas are outside of the easement and should not impact the easement. 4. Characteristics of the Area. The land to the east is a developed single-family subdivision called Danville Station with a zoning of RS 7.2. The properties directly north, west, and south are also single-family zoned (RS 7.2) with sparsely developed larger properties. 5. Adverse Impacts. The project has undergone a SEPA review and was issued a DNS. No significant adverse impacts were identified in the record or during public hearing that are not adequately addressed in the recommended conditions to approval, including landscaping, tree retention plan, and other services and improvements identified below. The subject site, however, will not be clear-cut and rendered barren at this stage of development. Tree cutting at the preliminary plat stage is limited to the minimum necessary to permit construction of required improvements. The neighbors certainly expressed some legitimate concerns about impacts, but they can't be addressed through this permitting process. Their issues raise mixed questions of law and fact, (PA0700663.DOC; 1/13041900000/) Preliminary Plat Recommendation Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation Page 2 of 8 but will be addressed in this factual finding for ease of reference. As noted previously, Mr. Hawkins would like the Applicant to construct a fence in order to protect his home from the surrounding area and to keep his children and dogs on site. [n essence. Me. Hawkins assel1s that the Applicant is responsible for the'-'llctions of vandals, and his dogs and children. Constitutionally, the City can only make developers mitigate the adverse impacts they create. Mr. Hawkins is requesting that the Applicant construct a fence to mitigate for the actions of third pal1ies. The City does not have the legal authority to do this. Cel1ain types of construction activities can serve as an attractiv:e nuisance or danger to the public and thereby justify fencing requirements. Deep excavations, for example, adjacent to sidewalks would typically trigger a fence requirement. There is nothing in the record to suggest that the Applicant is proposing any construction activities that would create such a hazard. Ms. Diamond raises a very interesting point about developments going fallow in these difficult economic times. Ms. Diamond's anecdotal comments do suggest that uncompleted subdivisions can create aesthetic blight and attract vandalism. However, in order to consider these impacts on a case by case basis, the economic viability of each project would have to be considered. The City could cel1ainly not condition or deny a project on the basis of lack of marketability if a developer could prove otherwise. Such an analysis is too speculative for permit review. There is cel1ainly insufficient evidence in this record to establish that this Applicant will construct subdivision improvements and then abandon them or delay fUl1her development for several years. Given that developers usually do not have much incentive to make subdivision improvements for lots they cannot sell, it is unlikely that uncompleted subdivisions would be a widespread problem for any significant period of time. If this is or does become a widespread problem, it should be addressed legislatively where economic feasibility can be addressed in a more general, city-wide basis as opposed to project level feasibility. 6. Adequacy of Infrastructure and Public Services. As mitigated by staff, adequate infrastructure will serve development as follows: · Pedestrian System: A sidewalk will be provided along the length of SW 344th Street, 22nd Place SW, and SW 344th COUI1. Specifically, half street improvements include a four-foot wide planter strip, five-foot wide sidewalk, and three-foot-wide utility strip. The Federal Way School District reviewed the plans and had no comments at this time regarding school access paths or configuration. · Subdivision Access and Roadway System: The subdivision is accessed through 22nd Place SW, which connects to SW 344th Street (minor collector). All lots are then accessed directly by SW 344th COUI1. The subdivision does front 21st Avenue SW (al1erial street), but is not directly accessed from 21st Avenue SW. · Street Improvements: With the exception of lots 7 and 8, all of the proposed lots are of rectangular shape. The subdivision is accessed through 22nd Place SW, which connects to SW 344th Street. All lots are then accessed directly by SW 344th Court. The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the project and concluded that the proposed {P A0700663.DOC; III 304190000011 Preliminary Plat Recommendation Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation Page 3 of 8 " street layout of the Eagle Manor subdivision is consistent with the adopted codes and comprehensive plan in place at the time of the complete application. Recommendation of approval jssonditioned upon street improvements to meet the code. · Open Space: To provide adequate recreational opportunities commensurate with new residential development, FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," requires setting aside land on site for open space, or a fee-in-lieu payment The Applicant has proposed the fee-in-lieu option rather than providing on-site open space. The fee-in-lieu of open space shall be calculated on 15 percent of the assessed value of the property based on a current King County assessment at the time of final plat approval. · Fire Protection: Certificate of Water Availability from the Lakehaven Utility District indicates that water will be available to the sitt; in sufficient quantity to satisfy fire flow standards for the proposed development South King County Fire and Rescue requires that a fire hydrant be located within 350 feet of each lot The exact number and location of fire hydrants wiII be reviewed and approved by South King Fire and Rescue. · Schools: As part of the City's initial review of the proposal, the preliminary plat application was referred to the Federal Way School District for comments. Comments from the school district indicate Sherwood Forest Elementary, lIIahee If. High School, and Todd Beamer Senior High School will serve the proposed subdivision. There is school bus transportation to all three schools. The proposed sidewalk from the development should provide safe access to bus stops. The Applicant provided on June 10, 2008, a School Access Analysis (Exhibit 10). The School Access Analysis identifies a safe path of travel for students walking to and from school. Final location and design of the school access path must be approved by the Federal Way School District and the Federal Way Public Works Department prior to issuance of construction permits for infrastructure improvements. School service areas are reviewed annually and may be adjusted to accommodate enrollment growth and new development School impact fees, as authorized by City ordinance and collected at the time of building permit issuance, are currently $4,077.00 per single- family housing unit School impact fees are determined on the basis of the District's Capital Facilities Plan and are subject to annual adjustment and update. · Sewage Disposal: The Applicant proposes to serve the proposed plat by a public sewer system managed by Lakehaven Utility District. A December 29, 2006, signed Certificate of Sewer Availability indicates the District's capacity to serve the proposed development through a Developer Extension Agreement (DEA) between the Applicant and the District. · Water Supply: The Applicant proposes to serve the subdivision with a public water supply and distribution system managed by the Lakehaven Utility District. A {PA0700663.00c; 1/13041.900000I1 Preliminary Plat Recommendation Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation Page 4 of 8 December 29, 2006, signed Certificate of Water Availability (Exhibit 12) indicates Lakehaven's capacity to serve the proposed development. · Drainage Facilities: Developfu~nt of the site will create additional runoff from new impervious surfaces such as streets, driveways, and rooftops. Storm drainage facilities must be designed in accordance with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City's amendments to the manual. Detention will be provided by an existing detention pond that serves the adjacent plat to the west, Virginia Hills. This pond will be modified and enlarged so that it can adequately serve both plats. It is located within a City-owned and maintained tract. The Applicant will be dedicating additional property to the City to enlarge the tract. Detention will meet Level I flow control reqUIrements. In addition, due to a downstream conveyance system nuisance flooding problem, the pond will be sized to provide further storage to avoid aggravating the problem. Water quality treatment meeting the Resource Stream Protection menu in the 1998 KCSWDM is also required. The developer proposes a Stormfilter cartridge system to meet this requirement. The system will be sized to meet treatment requirements for both the proposed plat and the plat of Virginia Hills, so it can replace the water quality function of the original pond that will be lost due to the proposed modifications. A landscape tract along the west and south sides of the new stormwater tract will be dedicated to the homeowners' association. The maintenance agreement for the private landscape tract shall be included on the face of the plat and the language shall be approved by the City. Final review of the stormwater quality and detention pond will occur in conjunction with the plat improvement engineering plans. CONCLUSIONS OF LA \V Procedural: I. Authority of Hearing Examiner: Examiner with the authority to conduct Council on preliminary plat applications. FWCC 20-110 (4) and (5) provide the Hearing a hearing and make a recommendation to the City Substantive: 2. Zoning Designation: RS 7.2. 3. Review Criteria and Application. FWCC 20-126(c) governs the criteria for preliminary plat approval. Those criteria are quoted in italics below and applied to the application under corresponding Conclusions of Law. FWCC 20-126(c): Decisional Criteria. A Hearing Examiner shall use the following criteria in reviewing the preliminary plat and may recommend approval of the plat to the City Council if: ( 1) It is consistent with the comprehensive plan; {PA0700663.DOC; 1/1304190??oo11 Preliminary Plat Recommendalion Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation Page 5 of 8 ~ 4. The application is subject to the adopted 2003 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), which designates the property as Single Family - High Density. The proposed land use, Single-Family Residential plat, wiih__7,200 square-foot minimum lot size (RS-7.2), is consistent with density allowances and policies applicable to this land use as established in the FWCP. The application is consistent with the following Comprehensi ve Plan Policies: (I) LUPI4: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single-family neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations; and (2) LUP 17: Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve single family neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. FWCC 20-126(c)(2): It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Chapter, including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan: 5. The preliminary plat application is required to comply with the provisions of the FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; Chapter 22, "Zoning"; and all other applicable codes and regulations. Future development of the residential subdivision will be required to comply with all applicable development codes and regulations. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by staff, the preliminary plat complies with all provisions of the chapter. FWCC 20-126(c)(3): It is consistent with public health, safety, and welfare. 6. The proposed preliminary plat would permit development of the site consistent with the current Single Family - High Density land use classification of the FWCP and map. Proposed access and fire hydrant locations must meet aJl requirements of South King Fire and Rescue. Sidewalks are proposed to provide safe access to schools and school bus stops. Future development of the plat in accordance with applicable codes and regulations should ensure protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. FWCC 20-126(c)(4): It is consistent with the design criteria listed in FWCC 20-2: FWCC 20-2: This chapter is adopted in furtherance of the comprehensive plan of the City. It is hereby declared that the regulations contained in this chapter are necessary to: ( 1 ) Promote the health, safety and general welfare in accordance with the standards established by the state and the city; 7. As noted in the Washington State Growth Management Act, the Washington State Legislature has found it to be in the public interest to prevent urban sprawl and to promote the efficient use of infrastructure. The development proposed by the Applicant at urban densities meets these objectives. Also, as previously discussed, the project, as mitigated, creates no material or significant adverse impacts and there is adequate infrastructure to meet the needs of the new development. For these reasons, the project promotes the health, safety, and general welfare in accordance with the standards established by the state and the city. I PA0700663.DOC; 1113041.9OOOOOI} Preliminary Plat Recommendation Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation Page 6 of 8 FWCC 20-2(2): Promote effective use of land by preventing the overcrowding or scattered development which would injury health. safety or the general welfare due to lack of water supplies. sanitary sewer, drainage, transportation or other public services, or excessive expenditure of public funds for such services: 8. As previously noted, the project constitutes development in an area that is already characterized and developed by residential development. Also as previously discussed, the project is served (or as conditioned will be served) by adequate infrastructure. For these reasons, the above criterion is satisfied. FWCC 20-2(4): Provide for adequate light and air. 9. The density of the project meets the density requirements for the RS 7.2 zoning. The Applicant will have to comply with the dimensional requirements of the zoning code for any structures it builds in order to get through building permit review. The dimensional standards of the City's Zoning Code set the standard for adequacy of light and air and for these reasons the above criterion is satisfied. FWCC 20-2(5): Provide for water, sewage, drainage, parks and recreational areas, sites for schools and school grounds and other public requirements: to. As noted in the Findings of Fact, the project is served by adequate infrastructure. FWCC 20-2(6): Provide for proper ingress and egress: 11. According to staff, as conditioned, access to all lots wiJl comply with City design standards. FWCC 20-2(7): Provide for housing and commercial needs of the community: J 2. The project constitutes a development at urban densities and therefore satisfies the above criteria. FWCC 20-2(8): Require uniform monumenting of land divisions and conveyance of accurate legal descriptions: 13. FWCC 20-III(b) requires that the survey of the proposed subdivision must be made by or under the supervision of a registered land surveyor who shall certify that it is a true and correct representation of the land surveyed. This and other requirements like it help ensure that the objective of unifonn monumenting of land divisions and accurate legal descriptions are satisfied. FWCC 20-2(9): Protect environmentally sensitive areas: ( P A0700663.00C; 11130419??oo0/) Preliminary Plat Recommendation Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation Page 7 of8 14. As noted previously, the project has gone through a review under the State Environmental Policy Act, which ensures that all environmentally sensitive areas are protected and mitigated. As noted above, a Detennination of Nonsignificance was issued. ..-. -- FWCC 20-2(10): Provide for flexibility and site design to accommodate view enhancement, protection, proJection of streams and wetlands, protection of steep slopes and other environmental significant or sensitive areas. IS. As noted above, there are no significant environmental or sensitive areas in or around the subject site. FWCC 20-125(c)(5): It is consistent with the development standards listed in FWCC 20-151 through 20-157, and 20-178 through 20-187. 16. Development of this site is required to comply with the provisions of FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; Chapter 22, "Zoning"; and all other applicable local and state development codes and regulations. As proposed, and as recommended by City staff, the preliminary plat application complies with all applicable statutes, codes, and regulations. RECOMMENDA TION The Hearing Examiner recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat as set forth in the staff report for 08-106512-00-S U by Associate Planner David Lee, subject to conditions 1 through 4 therein set forth, except as noted by staff during public hearing, street frontage improvement along SW 344th street referenced in condition 2 should be half street. Dated this 10 t:.h day of July, 200S. HEARING EXAMINER By: ~~ +;~. Phil Olbrechts City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner (PA0700663.DOC; 1113041900000/1 Preliminary Plat Recommendation Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation Page 8 of 8 ~ " f DECLARATION OF MAILING I, Gloria J. Zak, make the folld"Wing declaration: On the lith day of July, 2008, I mailed a true and correct copy of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation of Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC to the following: William Shupe Homberg BAIMA & HOMBERG, INe. LOO Front Street South Issaquah W A 98092 and Randy Goodwin EAGLE CREEK LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLe. 11290 SE 294th Street Auburn WA 98092 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. EXECUTED at Seattle, Washington this.LL- day of July, 2008. ,~ ii2 2- Glorial. Zak U (GJZ700673.DOC; 1113041.90??oo1) ~ CITY OF ~ Federal Way COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Federal Way File No. 06-106512-00-SU Related File No: 06-106513-00-SE PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 26, 2008 2:00 P.M. FEDERAL WAY CITY HALL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 33325 8th Avenue South Table of Contents I. General Infonnation ........................ ............................................................................................. .......2 JJ. Consulted Departments and Agencies ................. ...... ................ ......................................................... 3 Ill. State Environmental Policy Act .......... ........... ........... ........... ...... ......................... ........ ........................3 IV. Natural Environment......................................................................................... .................. ........ ........ 3 V. Neighborhood Characteristics ....................... ......... ..................................... .................... .............. ...... 4 VI. General Design............................................................................................................................. .......4 VJJ . Transportation.... .......................................................................................... ........... ......... ............... ..... 5 VIJJ. Public Services............................... ........ ............................................................ ............ ............ ......... 6 IX. Utilities ........................... ......................... ..... ................................................................... .............. ...... 6 X. Analysis of Decisional Criteria..................... ............................. .......... ......................... ....................... 7 Xl. Findings of Fact ................................... ................ ....................................................... ................ ......... 8 XJJ. Recommendation........................... .................................................. .......... ................... ............. ........ 10 X]]I. List of Exhibits.............................. ................................ ............. ...................................... ................. 11 Report Prepared by: David Lee, Associate Planner June] 3, 2008 File No: 06-1 06512-00-SU (SEP A Related File No: 06-106S13-SE) Engineer: William Shupe Homberg Baima & Homberg, Inc. 100 Front Street South Issaquah, WA 98027-3817 Owner: Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC Randy Goodwin 11290 SE 2941b Street Auburn, WA 98092 Action Requested: Preliminary plat approval of a 12-lot single-family residential subdivision as provided for under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," and requiring approval pursuant to FWCC Section 20-110. Staff Representative: Associate Planner David Lee, 253-835-2622 Staff Recommendation: Preliminary Plat Approval Subject to Conditions I. GENERAL INFORMA TION A. Description of the Proposal- The proposal is to subdivide 3.11 acres into 12 residential single- family lots. Street improvements, water, sewer, utilities, storm drainage control improvements, and other related infrastructure improvements will be installed to service the plat. The preliminary site plan, revised June 10, 2008, along with a conceptual utility, and grading plan by Baima & Homberg, Inc. are enclosed (Exhibit 1). Additionally, the tree retention plan, street tree plan, landscape plan, and details plan, resubmitted July 13,2007, have also been enclosed (Exhibit 13). B. Location - The subject property is located on the southwest comer of 21 51 Avenue SW & SW 3441h Street, Federal Way, W A (Exhibit 2). C. Parcel No. - 894720-0120. Legal description is shown on the plat. D. Size of Property - The subject site has a land area of 135,494 square feet (3.11 acres). E. Land Use and Zoning - Direction Site North South East West Zoning RS 7.2 RS7.2 RS 7.2 RS 7.2 RS 7.2 Comprehensive Plan SF - High Density SF - High Density SF - High Density SF - High Density SF - High Density Existing Land Use Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Page 2 File No. 06-1 06512-00-SU/Doc JD. 45566 F. Background - The preliminary plat of Eagle Manor was submitted on December 29,2006 (Exhibit 3). The application was determined complete on January 14,2007. II. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application. A. Community Development Review Committee (CDRC), consisting of the Federal Way Community Development Services Planning and Building Divisions; Public Works Engineering and Traffic Divisions; Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Department; South King Fire and Rescue; Lakehaven Utility District; City of Tacoma; and Federal Way Public Schools. CDRC comments have been incorporated into this report where applicable. B. All property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site were mailed notices of the complete preliminary plat application (Exhibit 4). The site was also posted and notice published in the newspaper and on the City's official notice boards. C. In accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) and FWCC Chapter l8, "Environmental Protection," all property owners and occupants within 300 feet ofthe site, and all affected agencies, were notified of the proposed action and the City's environmental decision. In addition, the site was posted and notice placed in the newspaper and on the City's official notice boards. III. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT An Environmental Determination of Nons ign ificance (DNS) was issued by the City of Federal Way for the proposed action on September 15,2007 (Exhibit 5). This determination was based on review of information in the project file, including the environmental checklist (Exhibit 6), and staff evaluation of the environmental checklist for the Eagle Manor Subdivision (Exhibit 7), resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not result in probable significant adverse impacts on the environment. No comments or appeals on the SEPA decision were submitted to the City. IV. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT A. Soils _ The 1973 King County soils survey map lists the soils type as AIderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgB). Alderwood soils are characterized as moderately well drained soils that have a weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of24 - 40 inches. AgB soils are described as capable for urban development, runoff is slow, and erosion hazard is slight. Typical soils excavation will occur with the street construction, at the site of the proposed on-site water quality/flow control treatment facility, and for utility installation. The preliminary clearing and grading plan depicts clearing limits for construction of the following facilities: street right-of- way, surface water pond, demolition of existing structures, and utility development. B. Topography - Baima & Homberg, Inc., has prepared a conceptual storm drainage analysis for the project (January 10,2008, Exhibit 8). The soils characteristics are described in detail in the report. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Eagle Manor Preliminary Pial Page 3 File No. 06- ) 065 ) 2-00-SU/Doc I.D 45566 The City of Federal Way Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map does not reveal this site to be in a problem area relative to landslide, seismic hazard, erosion, steep slope hazards, or 100-year flood plain. C. Vegetation _ The site is currently partially wooded with thick shrubbery. A mixture of conifer and deciduous trees reside on the property. A tree survey (Exhibit 1) was submitted with the application as part of the required landscape plan. There are a total of36 significant trees on the subject property. The applicant has proposed to remove 18 of these trees from the interior of the site for infrastructure. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568, no tree replacement is required. City policy and FWCC Section 20-179 state that existing mature vegetation shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. Retained significant trees outside of open space areas would be regulated under FWCC Section 22-1568, "Significant Trees," at the time of individual home construction. D. Wetlands - There are no wetlands on site or within 200 feet of the subject property. No wetlands or surface waters are known to exist on or around the property, and no wetlands or streams are identified on the City's environmentally sensitive areas maps. E. Wildlife and Habitat - No wildlife species recognized as priority species are known to inhabit the site or the nearby vicinity. V. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS Vicinity _ The property is situated in the southwestern portion of the City, in a single-family residential area with RS 7.2 zoning encompassing the subject property. The site is currently undeveloped. The land to the east is a developed single-family subdivision called Danville Station with a zoning ofRS 7.2. The properties directly north, west, and south are also single-family zoned (RS 7.2) and sparsely developed larger properties. VI. GENERAL DESIGN A. Density and Lot Size - Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-153, all lots in conventional subdivisions shall meet the density and minimum lot size requirements-in this instance, 7,200 square feet per lot. The proposed 12 lots each meet this minimum size. B. Lot Layout _ With the exception oflots 7 & 8, all ofthe proposed lots are of rectangular shape. The subdivision is accessed through 220dPlace SW, which connects to SW 344thStreet. All lots are then accessed directly by SW 344th Court. All building setback lines (BSBL) are depicted on the preliminary plat map, and each lot contains an adequate building area. A 20-foot-wide storm drainage easement runs east to west along the northern property line; however, the properties' (abutting the northern property line) buildable areas are outside of the easement and should not impact the easement. C. Open Space _ To provide adequate recreational opportunities commensurate with new residential development, FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," requires setting aside land on site for open space, or a fee in lieu payment. The applicant has proposed the fee in lieu option rather than providing on-site open space. The fee in lieu of open space shall be calculated on 15 percent of Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Page 4 File No. 06-1 065 1 2-00-SU/Doc m 45566 the assessed value of the property based on a current King County assessment at the time of final plat approval. At the applicant's discretion, the market value may be based on an appraisal conducted by an MAl certified appraiser or another professional appraiser approved by the Parks Director. D. Subdivision Access and Roadway System - The subdivision is accessed through 22nd Place SW, which connects to SW 344th Street (minor collector). All lots are then accessed directly by SW 3441h Court. The subdivision does front 2ls1 Avenue SW (arterial street), but is not directly accessed from 21s1 Avenue SW. Section VII of this report provides a detailed description ofthe proposed roadway system and improvements. E. Pedestrian System - A sidewalk will be provided along the length of SW 344th Street, 22nd Place SW, and SW 344th Court. Specifically, half street improvements include a four-foot-wide planter strip, five-foot-wide sidewalk, and three-foot-wide utility strip. The Federal Way School District has reviewed the plans and does not have any comments at this time regarding school access paths or configuration. F. Landscape Buffers - In accordance with FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," landscape buffers are specified only when the plat is adjacent to an incompatible zoning district. The proposed plat is bordered on all sides by single-family residential zoning; therefore, no perimeter buffers are required. A Type III landscape buffer 10' in width (Tract "A"/Exhibit 13) is provided for along the length of21 51 Avenue SW (east property line) in accordance to FWCC Section 20-178(a). VII. TRANSPORTATION A. Street Improvements - With the exception of lots 7 & 8, all of the proposed lots are of rectangular shape. The subdivision is accessed through nnd Place SW, which connects to SW 344th Street. All lots are then accessed directly by SW 344th Court. The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the project and concluded that the proposed street layout of the Eagle Manor subdivision is consistent with the adopted codes and comprehensive plan in place at the time of the complete application. 22nd Place SW, which connects to SW 3441h Street and SW 344th Court, shall be constructed to City Standard roadway section "W" as follows: a 28-foot paved roadway with curb and gutter, a four-foot planter strip with street trees, five-foot sidewalk, and a three-foot utility strip with streetlights, along all margins (52-foot right-of-way). The existing right-of-way width and pavement width appear to meet current standards; therefore, the applicant will be required to construct the planter strip, sidewalk, street trees, streetlights, and utility strip as a condition of this plat. Street frontage improvements along SW 3441h Street shall be constructed to a City standard Type "S" street section, consisting of a 36-foot paved roadway with four-foot planter strip with street trees, five-foot sidewalks, and three-foot utility strip with streetlights. Street lighting is required on all streets, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1522. The Public Works Department and South King Fire and Rescue have approved preliminary roadway design and curve radii as proposed. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Page 5 File No. 06-106512-00-SU/Doc ID 45566 B. Off-Site Traffic Mitigation - This proposal has been reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). No mitigation for traffic impacts was identified in the SEPA review of the proposal. The complete application of this project predates city concurrency requirements. VIII. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Schools - As part of the City's initial review of the proposal, the preliminary plat application was referred to the Federal Way School District for comments. Comments from the school district indicate Sherwood Forest Elementary, IIlahee Jr. High School, and Todd Beamer Senior High School will serve the proposed subdivision. There is school bus transportation to all three schools. The proposed sidewalk from the development will provide safe access to bus stops. Bus stops are at: SW 344th Street and 24th Place SW (Sherwood Forest); 2ih Avenue SW and SW 344th Street (IIlahee); and 27th Avenue SW and SW 34Sth Court (Todd Beamer). B. The applicant provided on June 10, 2008, a School Access Analysis (Exhibit 10). The school access analysis identifies a safe path of travel for students walking to and from school. In summary, a safe route of school-related pedestrian travel will be provided by new pedestrian' pathways, of on average, five-foot asphalt walking path next to the driving surface. A full detailed analysis of each pedestrian pathway to the schools is provided for within the School Access Analysis. It should be noted, however; due to the distance created by the location ofthe new subdivision and the existing schools, it is highly unlikely that pedestrian travel will occur with any frequency. Final location and design of the school access path shall be approved by the Federal Way School District and the Federal Way Public Works Department prior to issuance of construction permits for infrastructure improvements. School service areas are reviewed annually and may be adjusted to accommodate enrollment growth and new development. School impact fees, as authorized by City ordinance and collected at the time of building permit issuance, are currently $4,077.00 per single-family housing unit. School impact fees are determined on the basis of the district's Capital Facilities Plan and are subject to annual adjustment and update. C. Parks & Open Space - The applicant has chosen to satisfy the open space requirement of FWCC Section 20-155 via a fee in lieu payment, which is recommended to be approved by the City of Federal Way Parks Director. The fee in lieu of open space payment shall be calculated on IS percent ofthe most recent assessed or appraised value of the property. D. Fire Protection - The Certificate of Water Availability from the Lakehaven Utility District indicates that water will be available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy fire flow standards for the proposed development. South King Fire and Rescue requires that a fire hydrant be located within 3S0 feet of each lot. The exact number and location of fire hydrants will be reviewed and approved by South King Fire and Rescue. IX. UTILITIES A. Sewage Disposal- The applicant proposes to serve the proposed plat by a public sewer system managed by Lakehaven Utility District. A December 29, 2006, signed Certificate of Sewer Availability (Exhibit 11) indicates the district's capacity to serve the proposed development through a Developer Extension Agreement (DEA) between the applicant and the district. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Page 6 File No. 06- 1065 J 2-00-SU/Doc. 10 45566 B. Water Supply - The applicant proposes to serve the subdivision with a public water supply and distribution system managed by the Lakehaven Utility District. A December 29, 2006, signed Certificate of Water Availability (Exhibit 12) indicates Lakehaven's capacity to serve the proposed development. If additional hydrants or other fire protection systems are indicated, a Development Extension Agreement may be required. C. Drainage Facilities - Development of the site will create additional runoff from new impervious surfaces such as streets, driveways, and rooftops. Stonn drainage facilities are being designed in accordance with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City's amendments to the manual. The applicant's resubmitted January 10,2008, preliminary Conceptual Stonn Drainage Analysis (Exhibit 13) by Baima & Holmberg, Inc., was reviewed by the City's Public Works Department. Detention will be provided by an existing detention pond that serves the adjacent plat to the west, Virginia Hills. This pond will be modified and enlarged so that it can adequately serve both plats. It is located within a City-owned and maintained tract. The applicant will be dedicating additional property to the City to enlarge the tract. Detention will meet Level 1 flow control requirements. In addition, due to a downstream conveyance system nuisance flooding problem, the pond will be sized to provide further storage to avoid aggravating the problem. Water quality treatment meeting the Resource Stream Protection menu in the 1998 KCSWDM is required. The developer proposes a Stonnfilter cartridge system to meet this requirement. The system will be sized to meet treatment requirements for both the proposed plat and the plat of Virginia Hills, to replace the water quality function of the original pond that will be lost due to the proposed modifications. A landscape tract along the west and south sides of the new stormwater tract will be dedicated to the homeowners' association. The maintenance agreement for the private landscape tract shall be included on the face of the plat and the language shall be approved by the City. Final review of the stonnwater quality and detention pond will occur in conjunction with the plat improvement engineering plans. X. ANALYSIS OF DECISIONAL CRITERIA The FWCC establishes review procedures and decisional criteria for deciding upon various types of land use applications. Pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," Section 20-110, preliminary plat applications are submitted to the Hearing Examiner for public hearing. The preliminary plat application and the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner are submitted to the City Council for approval or disapproval. Hearing Examiner Preliminary Plat Decisional Criteria - Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-126(c), the Hearing Examiner may recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat only if the following decisional criteria are met. Decisional criteria and staff responses are provided below. 1. The project is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff Comment: The application is subject to the adopted 2003 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), which designates the property as Single Family - High Density. The proposed land use, Single-Family Residential plat, with 7,200 square-foot minimum lot size (RS-7.2), is consistent with density allowances and policies applicable to this land use as established in the FWCP. The application is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Policies: Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Page 7 File No. 06-1065] 2-00-SU/Doc ID 45566 a. LUPI4: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single-family neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations. b. LUPI7: Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve single- family neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. 2. The project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan. Staff Comment: The preliminary plat application is required to comply with the provisions ofthe FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; Chapter 22, "Zoning"; and all other applicable codes and regulations. Future development of the residential subdivision will be required to comply with all applicable development codes and regulations. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by staff, the preliminary plat will comply with all provisions of the chapter. 3. The project is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat would permit development of the site consistent with the current Single Family - High Density land use classification of the FWCP and map. Proposed access and fire hydrant locations must meet all requirements of South King Fire and Rescue. Future development of the plat in accordance with applicable codes and regulations will ensure protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. It is consistent with the design criteria listed in Section 20-2. Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat would promote the purposes identified in FWCC Section 20-2, and the standards and regulations therein, as identified in the staff report, including effective use ofland, promotion of safe and convenient travel on streets, and provision for the housing needs of the community. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by City staff, the preliminary plat application complies with all provisions of the chapter. S. It is consistent with the development standards listed in Sections 20-] 51 through 157, and 20-158 through 187. Staff Comment: Development of this site is required to comply with the provisions of FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; Chapter 22, "Zoning"; and all other applicable local and state development codes and regulations. As proposed, and as recommended by City staff, the preliminary plat application complies with all applicable statutes, codes, and regulations. XI. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on an analysis of the proposed action, environmental record, and related decisional criteria, the Department of Community Development Services finds that: 1. The proposal includes the subdivision of 3.11 acres into 12 residential single-family lots and a private stormwater detention facility. 2. The preliminary plat application is subject to the 2003 FWCP, and the codes and regulations in effect at the time the application was deemed complete, which was January 17,2007. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Page 8 File No. 06-1065 12-00-SU/Doc I D 45566 3. The subject property is designated Single Family -High Density in the 2003 FWCP. 4. An Environmental Determination of Non significance (DNS) was issued for this proposed action on August 22, 2007. No appeals of the SEPA decision were submitted to the City. 5. Zoning for the site is RS-7.2 (minimum lot size 7,200 square feet). Properties to the north, east, south, and west of the subject property are also zoned RS 7.2. The proposed residential subdivision and density is consistent with applicable zoning and subdivision regulations. 6. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-153, on this 3.1 I-acre parcel, the 12 proposed lots comply with applicable density requirements. 7. As proposed, each lot contains an adequate size and shape building envelope to contain a future single-family residence. Building setback lines (BSBL) are identified on the preliminary plat map. 8. A significant tree survey was submitted with the application. There are a total of 36 significant trees on the subject property. The applicant has proposed to remove l8 of these trees from the interior of the site for infrastructure. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568, no tree replacement is required. City policy and FWCC Section 20-179 state that existing mature vegetation shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. Retained significant trees would be regulated under FWCC Section 22-1568, "Significant Trees," at the time of individual home construction. 9. Development of the site will create additional runoff from new impervious surfaces such as streets, driveways, and rooftops. Storm drainage facilities are being designed in accordance with the 1998 KCSWDM and the City's amendments to the manual. The applicant's preliminary Conceptual Storm Drainage Analysis by Baima & Holmberg (resubmitted January 10, 2008), has been reviewed and has been preliminarily accepted by the City's Public Works Department. Detention will be provided by an existing detention pond that serves the adjacent plat to the west, Virginia Hills. This pond will be modified and enlarged so that it can adequately serve both plats. It is located within a City-owned and maintained tract. The applicant will be dedicating additional property to the City to enlarge the tract. Detention will meet Levell flow control requirements. In addition, due to a downstream conveyance system nuisance flooding problem, the pond will be sized to provide further storage to avoid aggravating the problem. Water quality treatment meeting the Resource Stream Protection menu in the 1998 KCSWDM is required. The developer proposes a Storm filter cartridge system to meet this requirement. The system will be sized to meet treatment requirements for both the proposed plat and the plat of Virginia Hills, to replace the water quality function of the original pond that will be lost due to the proposed modifications. A landscape tract along the west and south sides of the new stormwater tract will be dedicated to the homeowners' association. The maintenance agreement for the private landscape tract shall be included on the face of the plat and the language shall be approved by the City. 10. The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the project and concluded that the proposed street layout ofthe Eagle Manor subdivision is consistent with the adopted codes and comprehensive plan in place at the time of the complete application. 21st Avenue SW is considered an arterial street. 11. A safe route of pedestrian travel will be provided by construction of a five-foot sidewalk next to the driving surface, separated by an extruded asphalt curb from the project site along SW 344th Street, Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Page 9 File No. 06-1065 I 2-00-SU/Doc I D. 45566 22nd Place SW, and SW 344lh Court. Final location and design of the school access path shall be approved by the Federal Way School District and the Federal Way Public Works Department prior to issuance of construction permits for infrastructure improvements. 12. Water and sewer facilities are available from the Lakehaven Utility District and are adequate to serve the proposed development. It is the applicant's responsibility to secure all necessary water and sewer services from the utility provider. ] 3. The applicant has chosen to satisfy the open space requirement of FWCC Section 20-155 via a fee in lieu payment, which has been recommended for approval by the City of Federal Way Parks Director. The fee in lieu of open space payment shall be calculated on IS percent of the most recent assessed or appraised value of the property at the time of final plat approval. ] 4. The proposed preliminary plat is permitted by FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," and Chapter 22, "Zoning." 15. The proposed subdivision and all attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the FWCP; FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; Chapter 22, "Zoning"; and all other applicable codes and regulations. As proposed, and recommended by staff, the preliminary plat is consistent with the FWCP and all applicable codes and regulations. 16. Prior to final plat approval and recording, all required and approved improvements will be constructed, or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements. XII. RECOMMENDATION Based on review of this application, environmental record, and pertinent decisional criteria, the Department of Community Development Services recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions set forth in the FWCC. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Final storm drainage engineering plans shall comply with the following: A. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 KCSWDM and amendments adopted by the City of Federal Way. City of Federal Way approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. B. Level 3 flow control may be provided, or the engineer may instead meet the requirements for a Levell flow control "Type] Conveyance System Nuisance Problem" as outlined in Table 1.2.3.A in the 1998 KCSWDM. 2. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the current City of Federal Way Public Works Development standards for this project, including the following requirements: A. Road A (22nd Place SW) and Road B (SW 344lh Court) shall be constructed to City Standard roadway section "W" as follows: a 28-foot paved roadway with curb and gutter along all margins, a four-foot planter strip with street trees, five-foot sidewalk, and a three-foot utility strip with streetlights, all within a 52-foot right-of-way. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Page I 0 File No. 06-1 06512-00-SU/Doc ID m66 Street frontage improvements along SW 344th Street shall be constructed to a City standard Type "S" street section, consisting of a 36-foot paved roadway with four-foot planter strip with street trees, five-foot sidewalk, and three-foot utility strip with streetlights, within a 60- foot right-of-way. Street lighting is required on all streets, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1522. 3. Clearing for the construction of the plat improvements (roads, pond, and utilities) shall be generally consistent with the clearing limits depicted on the Preliminary Road Grading, Storm Drainage, and Utility Plan, which was prepared by the applicant for the preliminary plat process. The clearing limits referenced above are the approximate clearing limits necessary for road, utility, pond, and necessary lot grading, and may be modified with the approval of the Community Development and Public Works Departments during final engineering plan review as required to reflect changes in road and utility designs, if any. 4. Final location and design ofthe school access paths shall be approved by the Federal Way School District and Federal Way Public Works Department prior to issuance of construction permits for infrastructure improvements. XIII. LIST OF EXHIBITS 1. Preliminary Plat of Eagle Manor revised June 10, 2008, Existing Tree Removal Plan June 10, 2008, Preliminary Road Grading and Utility Plan revised June 10, 2008, all by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. 2. Vicinity Map 3. Master Land Use Application 4. Notice of Application S. SEPA DNS for Eagle Manor 6. Environmental Checklist for Eagle Manor 7. Final Staff Evaluation for SEPA Checklist, Eagle Manor 9. June 10,2008 (revised), School Access Analysis, prepared by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. 10. Lakehaven Utility District Certificate of Sewer Availability, signed December 29,2006 11. Lakehaven Utility District Certificate of Water Availability, signed December 29,2006 12. Technical Information Report, prepared by Baima & Holmberg, Inc., revised January 10,2008 13. Tree Retention, Landscape, Street Tree, & Detail Sheet by Baima & Holmberg, Inc., revised July 13,2007. Note: Copies of exhibits are not enclosed with all copies of this report. All exhibits have been provided to the Hearing Examiner. TRANSMITTED TO THE PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: Federal Way Hearing Examiner Applicant Agent: Ty Pendergraft Eagle Creek Land and Development, LLC 11290 SE 294th Street Auburn, W A 98092 Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Eagle Manor Preliminary Plat Page J J File No. 06-1065 J 2-00-SU/Doc 1.0 45566 i.' l/ EXH I B IT__<<+_______ PAGE-L.)F_oJ==~~_ ~ CITYOF ~ Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Eagle Manor Project Description: Proposal for a 13-lot single-family subdivision at approximately SW 3441b and 21s1 Avenue SW, on parcel #894720-0120. Applicant: Russell Millard, 24725 2301b Way SE, Maple Valley, W A 9S038 Agent: Same as applicant Owner: Same as applicant Project Location: SW 3441b Street & 21st Avenue SW (Parcel #894720-0120) Date Application Received: December 29, 2006 Date Determined Complete: April 14, 2007 Date of Notice of Application: April 14, 2007 Comment Deadline: 5 p.m., April 30, 2007 Permits Required: Preliminary Plat Approval (File #06-106512-00-SU) SEPA Determination: File #06-106513-00-SE Other Permits Known at this Time and notlncluded in this Application: Final Plat, Right-of-WayPermit Relevant Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist, Stormwater/Drainage Technical Information Report (TIR) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: l Yes No Development Regulations to be usedfor Project Mitigation. Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Any person may submit written comments on the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director ofCormnunity Development Services by 5:00 p.m. on April 30, 2007. Details of appeal procedures for the requested environmental decision will be included with the written decision. ConSistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including the FWCC environmental and zoning codes; surface and stormwater management codes; King County Road Standards; and King County Surface Water Design Manual. City Contact: Associate Planner David Lee, 253-835-2622 The official file is available for public review at the City of Federal Way, Department of Community Development Services, 33325 Sib Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on April 14, 2007. Doc. 10. 40468 FILE aROO ~~ Federal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Eagle Manor Subdivision File No. 06-106513-00-SE Description: The proposed action is to subdivide an existing lot (3.10 acres total) into 13 single- family lots. Applicant: Ty Pendergraft, Eagle Creek Land & Dev. LLC 13701 SE 253rd Street Kent, W A 98042 Location: Parcel# 894720-0120, Federal Way, W A Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services Staff Contact: David Lee, Associate Planner, 253-835-2622 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (BIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)( c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, final staff evaluation for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.060. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by October 1,2007. You may appeal this determination to Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services, at the City of Federal Way (33325 81b Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718) no later than 5 :00 p.m. on October 15, 2007. The appeal must be in the form of a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 15, 2007. 5 ---- ~_ )(\-\\8\1- --c.- ~ t- p. GE...l--O r> P Doc. I.D. 42336 Dee 05 06 02:43p Goodwin Fax . .-e;-- . - . 253-333-0078 ~ _~XH'B'T_..---~~~ c, .- . ::1" G: E' ..\ ')1:: l' r- A .,_ ..' r- _.._c,.......-~ p,1' $; ; JC su-~ ~ -'v.' j(','" \ '1~ ])8 ~E.ce.\\Je.o " 9 7.J~UG Qt.\, Q f~' I 2S3-B38-B4BB . ~~ ~~ : of' A1 \ ~IGtt1<>~fJ>GOE.i't.? :r J" '71S-- ,. S"1",( .....".,) e\)\\..~\~~ Dec. f15 2aa6 92; 3.4fIM P1 I \ l \ \ \ , MASTEl\ LAm> 'USB AP!UC~TlOJ.'tl Dg~1l1'\lI&lCTO' CoMIIUIII1'Y 0&\1.......:..--- nuS." A,,-18o&D POI..'''' ,.dUII w.,.WA. tIOtHTlI J5J-U,5.UO'J1"us.as.HU rnr~"'''''''- . . OOVOFA Federal Way , /1; -/(Xp5/3-tx) -56 MPL1CA1'DI NO(&) G.P ~I (i 051 Q, . (J) -SU ....- ))ate_ .1~R~fi< ~ ProJ.<<~m. Ra~le Manor "_nAddlurILI.".. . 346tb , 2.1at Ava IV ..rcl1.....ber(1) 8..,20-012.Q ~DacripHall. 8ulaJ:t...u. 01lA cn e fa'ld.1I 1:.8u.aCt*1 3.qtl . AppBSUlt II.. kala C1'ealr. 'LaD" . ~IoPILe.t. Ltc AddnIE n701 81 2!!:d8~. ~ 1mt. VA ZIp: '8041 lhoM: 106-730-9 45 ...: 2'!-3~ 78 ....1: ,$ ....: , 'l'Jpe erreradta.qulrtll _~tiaa _~Bh.?\ID _ 8o~u.a\&1ItIISInl _(lo,.,~J: . _tnaS\dlcaMaLtIDtiaD _tot Lt. 'Bli...l_~ _ ,.,,1iaItia.~ _ rn-a 1 (DbeIaI-cA(lplWli) _ "*-I1(11Il"""" _r/'lD.m~~ _l'mtaW ~1""""'DaIMlI) _pro_" (QaaWlldtd1l1 ~ Prac_VJ . :KSIPA .."..j- _81P.\0I11 _8Jxd1Ja: ~CIIlIlUBe _ SImn S'lllullwlalllll . -X-~ _ VIlliDnGat~' Ap'at (if'" IIIIIAfp"') I N..e A"'" CilJISIatv; Zip: J'hoMl Ia: 1uIa~ ....=: 0WIl1I' ~ :ro~... c. ~' e""3'f:""':"" S"...~ M4mr.' is ~ 2.-61- z.1UC ,L. tCoV . Cll)GlOI; F-e.J..~ tAJ.." l4JA.6A~""''' ;..,&, .. ,~.~ ~ .u.a... 1"_,,,If' '. . J : == ~ aequlnd JnfD\'ID&dOIl j,.S r-(' 2. .,..~ .~ '"' 0 C~ Pln tlciiptial _ ".~ .,rEWtlIllI 1JIlI'CI'CII'1II" VIhn efprgpcec4llDpfOftftllftb JALll'ftilUanal Juildllll Cock (lBC)1 .. . ,omlpUlOt"J'ypa . QlastRIdtIDa ~ : .A:' ,"-I UIdia lOllS -MIlIl LI, ,e04 lc\RIII~1." UaH,u... ",.(1 " 3~3wnaNl,^ "d~(:~ 900l'~ '~3a I ",lgqll 'QN ~ CITY OF ~ _, Fede:ral Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvotl.ederalwav.com ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A), RCW Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining ifthere may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non-Project Actions (part D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "~cw.eJiX..9r site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Nt:l.it:IVED Bulletin #050 August 19,2004 DEe 2 9 2006 \II __ ____~ CITY OF FEOER WAY P A G E.-:.LOF ~\Hmdout'\E",iro..... lIT.' A.BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Eagle Manor 2. Name of applicant: Eagle Creek Land & Development LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicants and contact person: Applicant: Randy Goodwin Eagle Creek LWJd & Dev. LLC 13701 SE 253U Sf. Kent, WA 98042 (253) 630-7700 Contact: Shupe Holmberg Baima & Holmberg, Inc. 100 Front St. South Issaquah, WA 98027 425-392-0250 4. Date checklist prepared: December 18, 2006 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way/Lakehaven Utility District 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construct Fall 2007 if permitting allows. 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes explain: No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will De prepared, directly related to this proposal: None known. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for government approvals of other .proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes ExplaIn: No. Page 2 of 16 E)(H\B\T_k--c---:-- PAGE~OF~ 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for you proposal, If known: Approval of engineering plans by the City of Federal Wai" Approval of water and sewer plans by Lakehaven Utility District DOE METRO 11. 12. Give brief, complete description of your (!roposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (lead agencies may modify this form to. include additional specific Information on project description. ) This proposal is to create a 13 lot single family subdivision of a 3.1 acre project site. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan. vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you shoulCl submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Portion of the SE Quarter of Section 24, Township 21 North, Range 3 East WM.. Southwest comer of the intersection of SW 344th & 21st Ave SW Tax Parcel No. 894720-0120 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one) Flat, portion rolling, hilly, portion_steep, portion slopes, mountainous:offier . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 7% Page 3 of 16 EXHIBIT ~- , PAGE ~ OF--1lL- c. What general types of soil are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland: AGB, Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam. d. Are there surface indications of or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe: No. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill: Grading & filling to construct roads. Earthwork will be balanced on site. Approximate onsite grading is 1000 cu yds. Select import will be required for road base (500 cu yd) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe: Yes, some erosion will occur during construction, erosion will be controlled. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 40% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: An ESe plan will be prepared. Erosion control measures will be provided per Federal Way Standards. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known: Exhaust from construction equipment during construction. Automobile exhaustaflerconsuucuon. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe: None known. Page 4 of 16 EXHIBIT ~~ · - PAGE~OF-1-~ ~- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, If any: Construction equipment will meet current emission standards; dust control will be provided during construction. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it trows into: No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please' describe and attach available plans: N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface waters or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material: None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description , purpose, and approximate quantities if known: No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan: No. Page 5 of 16 EXH\B\T- ~... C.t PAGE~OLj -- 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge: No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known: No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial. containing the following chemicals...: agricultural: efc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: N/A c. Water runoff (including storm water); 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so describe: Storm Drainage from the site will be collected in a tightline system and will discharge to a water quality bios wale located near the northeast comer of the site. A fee in lieu of providing storm detention is proposed. The site discharges to the Panther Lake Regional Detention Facility. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally explain: Small amounts of oil associated with normal automobile maintenance may enter the surface water. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts. If any: Storm water quality control will be provided per City of Federal Way Standards. A fee will be paid to release undetained storm water to the Panther Lake Regional Detention Facility. Page 6 of 16 ~~~~~~~ 4. Plants a. check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: XXX deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other XXX evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other XXX shrubs XXX grass XXX pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All vegetation will be removed in roadway and utility areas. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered or endangered species known to near or on the site: None known. Page 7 of 16 ,. EXH'B'T~---- . , - PAGE-=t-OF ~--- c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain: No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.: Electricity and natural gas will be used for heating future homes. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The new home construction would conform to the most recent uae and the Washington State energy codes. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. Page 8 of 16 EXHIBIT ~n- PAGE ca OF--"L- b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: Traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with tne project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noises would exist during the building of the roads and homes. These noises would occur generally between 7:30 am - 5:00 pm, Monday through Saturday. Once construction is complete, then noise would be generated by the normal course of action of a residential subdivision. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe: Not recently. c. Describe any structures on the site: None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RS7.2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? High-Density Single Family. Page 9 of 16 EXH'B'l~~~-~-~# PAGE~OF~ g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify: No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based upon "The 1991 Growth Report" prepared by King County, the community is experiencing an average of 2.97 people per dwelling unit. Therefore, the completed project could house 39 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the ,eroposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, If any: Urban zoning permits single family development. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing: 13 single family detached. Middle Income. . b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing: None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. Page 10 of 16 EXH\BIT-- __te--:-- PAGE~OF~- - 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed' structure(s). not including antennas: what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? Two story homes. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or Qlare will the proposal produce? What time of day would It mainly occur? Light from windows of homes. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Light from SW 344th St. & 21st Ave SW. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Panther Lake Park and Dash Point State Park. Page 11 of 16 EXHIBIT- -~~~--:- PAGE.~~_OL \ -- b. Would the proposed project displace and existing recreational uses? If so, describe: No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: A fee in lieu of providing recreation space is proposed. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are their any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe: No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site: None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: 21st Avenue SW SW 344th Sf. access to SW 344th St. will be provided by an internal public street to be constructed with this project. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not known. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project would create at least 2 parking spaces per new single family dwellmg. Page 12 of 16 EXHIBIT J~~~-:- PAGE~OL ~- d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally descrioe (indicate whether public or private). A new road will be required to serve the development-all new roads will be public. . e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur: 130 vehicular trips per day. Peak volumes would occur during AM & PM commute times. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Traffic mitigation fees will be paid by development. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: There will be an increased need for all public services due to 13 new single-family homes. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Traffic and school mitigation fees will be paid, increased tax base associated with 13 new homes. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural ~as, water, refuse service. telephone, sanitary sewer, septic sys em, other. Cable b. Des<?ri.be theutili~ies that are proposed for .the p~oj~ct, the util.ity proViding the service and the general construction actiVIties on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity, gas, water, telephone, sanitary sewer and cable TV Page 13 of 16 EXHIBIT -"Vl~-~ PAGE~OF: Ur c. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make a decision. Signature: ~ "\.A/~ ~/ Date Submitted: 11-./-:21/01t Page 14 of 16 EXHIBIT,u\l1 , PAGE~OE \>>n ~ D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list ofthe elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the proposal, ofthe types of activities likely to result from the proposal, and would it affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage or release of toxic of hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect of conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: EXHIBIT ~~... ," PAGE 6 OF--1!IL- Bulletin #050 - August 19, 2004 Page 15 of 16 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce of respond to such demands are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. EXHIBIT Jel, ," PAGE~OF~-- Bulletin #050 - August 19,2004 Page 16 of 16 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist r-II r= CITY OF #'""~ Federal Way FILE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Eagle Manor Subdivision Parcel # 894720-0120, Federal Way, W A File No: 06-106S13-00-SE, Related File No: 06-106S12-00-SU NOTE: The purpose of this staff evaluation is to provide a technical staff evaluation of the proposed action; supplement information contained in the environmental checklist and expanded studies; provide technical information unavailable to the applicant; correct inaccurate information; and reconnnend measures to the responsible official to mitigate identified environmental impacts. Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting David Lee, Associate Planner, 33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. Phone: 253-835-2622. I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action is to subdivide an existing lot (3.10 acres total) into 13 single-family lots. ll. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: North Lake Pointe Applicant: Ty Pendergraft, Eagle Creek Land & Dev. LLC 13701 SE 253rd Street Kent, W A 98042 Agent: Ty Pendergraft, Eagle Creek Land & Dev. LLC 13701 SE 253rd Street Kent, W A 98042 Location: Parcel# 894720-0120, Federal Way, W A RS 7.2 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning: Comp Plan Designation: Single-Family High-Density The following information was submitted as part of the application: 1. SEP A Checklist 2. Site Plans 3. Title Report 4. Master Land Use Application 5. King County Quarter Section Map 'I 6\1 1 -~. EXH\ ~-~ pp..GE.~Of: ",,-..,j;..' 'J -j ",,-..,j;.,:,,' s : ~ ') j ....'\\....JIlIhio;tJ ! ..~ ill. REvIEW PROCESS The proposed action is subject to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) review because it does not meet the exemptions contained in WAC 197-11-800(27). IV. BACKGROUNDIPROPOSAL The application was submitted on December 29,2006, and deemed complete on April 14, 2007. V. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the environmental checklist submitted for the proposed facility. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the environmental checklist If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. BACKGROUND 1-12. Concur with the checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth: a-h. Concur with the checklist 2. Air: a-c. Concur with the checklist. 3. Water: a. (1) - (6) Concur with the checklist b. (1) - (2) Concur with the checklist. c. (1) - (2) Concur with the checklist. d. Concur with the checklist. 4. Plants: a-d. Concur with the checklist. 5. Animals: a-d. Concur with the checklist 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a-c. Concur with the checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a. (1) - (2) Concur with the checklist. b. (I) - (3) Concur with the checklist. Staff Evaluation for Enviro~tarCI;etlqi~. '/ -.. Eagle Manor SU1)(livision . . < j i 0; /; '" Page 2 File No: 06-1 06513-00-SE/Doc.I.D. 4233S 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a-d and g-l. Concur with the checklist. e. The Comprehensive pran designation of the site is Single-Family High-Density. f. There is no shoreline designation for the site. 9. Housing: a-c. Concur with the checklist. 10. Aesthetics: a-c. Concur with the checklist. 11. Light and Glare: a-d. Concur with the checklist. 12. Recreation: a-c. Concur with the checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a-c. Concur with the checklist. 14. Transportation: a-g. Concur with the checklist. 15. Public Services: a-b. Concur with the checklist. 16. Utilities: a-b. Concur with the checklist. VI. CONCLUSION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment pursuant to a Determination of Non significance (DNS). This DNS is based on impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by Federal Way for the exercise of substantive authority under SEP A to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. The City reserves the right to review any future revisions or alterations to the proposal to determine the environmental significance or nonsignificance of the proposal at that time. Prepared by: David Lee. Associate Planner Date: September 15.2007 EXH1BIT PA"GE_~- 1 -,_....~- , ".- ~ Jr_ ~.~ Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Eagle Manor Subdivision Page 3 File No: 06-1 06513-OO-SElDoc. 1.0. 4233S STUDENT WALKWAY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: EAGLE MANOR PREPARED FOR: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33325 8TH AVE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA98063 (253) 835-7000 PREPARED BY: BAIMA & HOLMBERG, INC. 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027-3817 (425) 392-0250 DATE: JUNE 2008 B&H FILE# 45-099 RESUBMITTED JUN 1 0 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. EXHIBIT , f.=)AGE-LOF: ~~ STUDENT W ALKW A Y ASSESSMENT EAGLE MANOR PRELIMINARY PLAT SCHOOL INFORMATION: The school age children from the proposal will attend the following: · Sherwood Forest Elementary 34600 lih Ave SW Federal Way, W A 98003 253-945-3800 · Illahee Middle High School 36001 1st Ave South Federal Way, W A 98003 253-945-4600 · Todd Beamer High School 35999 16th Ave South Federal Way, W A 98003 253-947-2570 CURRENT BUS LOCATIONS Sherwood Forest Elementary, Illahee Middle, and Todd Beamer High School are all beyond walking distance; students will be bussed. Sherwood Forest Elementarv Bus stop is located on SW 344th St. @ 24th PI SW. · Students will exit the site onto SW 344th and walk west to 24th PI SW approx 400 feet. The shoulder along this route is approximately 7 feet and is paved. EXH 18' T_.. '1----__~. PAGE_ ~OF~ ~__".:. · See attached Aerial Photo Illahee Middle Bus stop is located at 2ih Ave SW & SW 344th PI. · Students will exit the site onto SW 344th and head west to 27th Ave SW about 700 feet, then proceed south on 2ih Ave SW about 200 feet to SW 344th Place. The shoulder along SW 344th is approximately 7 feet and is paved. 2ih Ave SW is a paved neighborhood street with a sidewalk. · See attached Aerial Photo Todd Beamer Hie:h School Bus stop is located on 2ih Ave SW @ SW 345th PI. . Students will exit the site onto SW 344th and walk west to 27th Ave SW about 700 feet, then proceed south on 2ih Ave SW about 450 feet to SW 345th Place. The shoulder along SW 344th is approximately 7 feet and is paved. 2ih Ave SW is a paved neighborhood street with a sidewalk. . See attached Aerial Photo SITE CONSTRUCTION The site will be constructed with a five-foot sidewalk along SW 344th St. fronting the site and with the interior road. FUTURE ACCESS TO SW 346TH ST. Access to the bus stops located on SW 346th St. would be possible with future development of Tax Parcels 957480-0014 and 957480-0015. EXHIBIT .1.,-=-. '. I~ p AGE_~_()F_~y..- .. DEe 2 9 2006 FROM '@ FEDERAL WAY KillS( COUllt)' CITY OF . Dept. Ilfl>evelopmCI\I RtlJt1n~IQRi.lil::eo; nulldlllll :\Iervkll.ll Dlv!il;n 900 ()Hl>~.adnlc Avollue SoulhwCIll R.cl\lntl, WlIshintfiln 98055- I 219 (206) 296.6600 TTY (206) 296-72 J 7 FAX NO. RECEIVED Alternative formats available t/; upon request \' King County Certificate of SeWer-Availability .--!ll,lmber This certificate provides the Seattle KIng County Department of PUblic Health and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with InfolTnatlOl1 necessary to eValuate development proposals. ~; I "11 i I Do not write In this box name [J BUilding Permit CI Short Subdivision ,b( Pl!ellmlnary Plat or PUD D' R4zone Of other Applicant's name; ~~ tJ.R.i!lJf.:k ~ ?-7>~u -"'~ ~1~Tt: - L/~ l.ocatIOll: 34J135 ~ ~ SW. I- :~I:f!: :~:d #1A;lf: ~~ -'"' , (attach map encllegal de&erlptlon If necessary) dd tY "...- Sewer agency inforll1ation: 1. [J a. Sewer servlceCJYI/,1)e provtded llyaide sewer COnnection onli,t to en existing s~e sews feet trom the site and the sewer SYSlem has;the capaCity to selV8lhe proposed use, OR ~ b. Sewer service Will require ian ~vemel'\t 10 the SElWl!lr eyeti:lm of: ~1) /19{) ~~ feet of 8ewer trunk Of lateral to teach the site; anti/or 2) The constructiOn of a collection system on the site; and/or""'- ~3) Other (describe) ~/1> "rt) t%',4.L a..b ~ Jilt ~LcA."t?Ito41c.e, 1tX-rt{ ~'7T'1'Ua- ~t.I~ ...- .2. 1 a. The Sewer system Improvement Is in I;Qnformance with a County approved se~r compl'8heneive plan. OR a b. The sewer system Improvement will require a sewer comprellenslve plan amendment. 3. 1 a. The proposecl project Is within the corporate limits of the dlstt1ct or has been QllInted aountlary Review Board approval for eldensiOn of StlI'IIlce oLrtstde the district Of clty. OR D b. Annnexatfon or aoundary RevIew Board (BRB) $pproval will be necessary to provide' servIce, 4. Service It; sullJect to the ftlllowlng: _ _,,/ iii. Connecllon charge: ~.a CA-l.C f/'LA-l"L::.P . b. Easement(s): As If;:. Vtll.... ~ .,/ c. Olher; ~\h5J~~ ~f~.J M~11Wr ~lU.:J.lJtA#-?> ...- . Th~ Ill.triot, ot 1/lI.oIe ai..rr~hln, "eIl.rve. th.. "~hllo dellly Of' deny .elt.. ,.,,,,1<1. bR..d OPRO .~pl~lly limlcndoll.llI Di.trlee ud Ojh.r Purveyor racil I c6I11fy that the sllove sewer agency InforlT1atlon Is tnJe, ThIs certification sha~ be valid fot one year from date of signature. LAJ<EHAVr.:N UTJJ:'ITY D1STRIC'1' Agency name ~ ENGINEEktNG TECHNICIAN i:( Title . T,!':N COR~WELL ~{.~1i- 4"::z!)-()Q Date..( ( -a sewer QVsllsj)JUty form.QQC b-cert'$eWer.p41f 02-0Ni!OO2 page 1 ( @ DEe 2 9 2006 King County Departmont at DllV6Iopmon~ert~ WAiYli8 ~~I~~I~e~:~~:e~~~~1~tLOING DEPT. . Rem011, Washln(Jton ga055-1rfg 206-29S-6flflQ Tl'Y 200-291'\..7217 RECEIVED FAX NO. Exiiu31T003 1:~: 10~11~~._~. ~ ~~OF----L- FROM Applic.ant's name: ,~~l.fr;/"p "frJ:EJ __. PropOSC:d use; ~tf'6t:r J..6r5 ~ -. . "~'7"ritJ-a(JI't tPf),:r Location:. '1f'i.2;;J/~;:.r;;.W (~) J/L. g ~t.t7~{?~rJ.._- --.--.,-' . (atiac;h m"; and logel de$l'lt'lption if necessary) This certificate provldet' the Seattle King County DepaNment of Public Health and the Department of Davelopment ami ~ t.,: En~lronment~ servlc~~ with ,inform~tlon necess~ry to tlVBlu.Elte deVel~PI11.n:.~~oposaIS...._" _.--.d.~ ~ i Lo 11(11 write In this box ---r.1Jl' , ~ : "---.--.- ...-----'...-.-... ..---- ~. ~~: .~V.l1be.!:..._.q._. .__ .._.._..._!)~r:!!!..-~__. __._..~ i,;' . Ji,I>-l ~! hi Duildina PGll'tnit . ~Pr(>limln(lry f.'lat or PI}[J &i ":' ~.'J o Short SUI)divislon . r.:l ~ezone or otheL., . ~,~ ~J 6: ~: F.j' I" ...;; l'~ . .._~ ffi~ I -" h: . t~ ~~ . ~. ~'"1; ~ Alternative formats available upo:n request r.... \1.- King County Certiificate of Water Availability Wi:ltor purveyor infol'mation: 1. 0 ll. Wllter~ be provided by SEll'Vioe conrlec1ioR only to en existing _.._ that Is feet from the site, ,_(size) watp.r main OR . ~ b. WaterBervlce~~Uirell':!)mprovemeI1tt~thewaterB~stemaf: ~ _A "'_ .-'.""It!r'~ '(1) ~'-~.'::J:; feOl ofW:ater main to reachtheslw; and/or e;.q... .M..-s .... if ~ (2) ThE) con~Ii'Uction of a distribuUon BYflt~n th;~Slt8; and/<ilr V ~It* ~mN'tJ. t<<bA~ fJl'I (3) Other (describe) u~'1~ w .~ ,r '#b I-W ~I/' s.,. .w....3Ii.it'LJi:I:;..~._ 2. ~. TIle water system Is In conformance with II County approved WElto~f comprehensive plan. OR Cl b. Tho waler :ly~tem Improvemont is I;N ill canfoflHanoa with a COlJnly ~pproved w.lter comprehenalwl plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause. a df!l~y /11 issuance of s permit or approval). . '. 3, rsr a. The propOp.eCf proJect Is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Revlow 80llrd approval for extension of ~ervice oUtSJde the tllstricl or city, or is within the County approved servlce area of a private water purveyor. OR CI b. Annexatlon or BOUndary Review Soard (BRS) appl'Oval will bEll1elllessary to provide Service. Water 15 or wlllllG aVSI~bIG at the rate ~ow'atld duration indicated bGIOw at no loss than 20 psi measured at the nearp.st fire hydrant ,..~...._feet rroltl the building/property (or aa mllrked on the ,,'ttached map): Rate of flow af Peak O~m"nd Oul1f1lon o less IhM 500 gpm (approx. _.. gpm) . 0 less than 1 hour . o 500 to 999 gplt1 CI 1 hour to 2 hOlJry ~1000 gpm 01' more ,/" ~ hours Or' more f.J flow test of ___. ~pm 0 other _,. D c:alculaUon of___. _.~ gpm (Note: COll)lllllrclal bUilding pennlts which indlude!l mUltifamilY SlI'Ucturell ret'lUlrEl flow test 01' calctlllltlon.) 4. ~ ~, OR 0/). I), J!!( a. W(1k'r systl;!l11 hilS t:p.rtlflca1es of Water right or Wl\t~r right cllllm5 aUffilllenlto provide sorvice. OR o b. W3I€lr~~f:rJ'tO~BII~CU'&~t~~CW.tI'/I~tS~~~~1$8' F,}It, L.tJ<f7 w-tt1{ Sl..v~ c~mlt1enl$/conditions:~..F. 'f;t.~ I ~ ~~~~~f~ E~~/IMJ ~1Wl!Wr: B..~QuIP6.'C,'" I certIfy that the abOve waleI' purveyor information is true. This' certltlcation shall be valid for one yell" h'Om datE) of sigllaturG. Water System/s not capable of prOViding 1lre flow. r,lI.KlJ:HAYBN U'.J:'II,I'ry.. DIS'J'ij.ICT AtlGnc:y name . EliIGlNEFoR1NG TI::CHNIC1AN II '1f- 24.../J6 -:ru;;;-'~'-'.'-, 61 11~,":'"V. .' 3''1/1.. . Dste'~~:;'I(>( -;~ .6RV-;':::~;~'~:~~;-~~~:~;:~~'on Of;r;~-;-~-f~~k;pT~:~~ =~:~~~lJre~~'f ~'=;:,. ...--.---.,,----.-., ..---.-..... ...-......-..-- -..-....-....--..., ~-_.-..,--~_.__.-..~_._- ----- .-.--.,.,.--_ __~..i!J .. The DIstrict, at Its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay or deny water service based up'on capacity "':t1itatJo~s in Dls~rlX:t and Other Purveyor facilitIes. Water :AveilahlHty form R"w, 05-19-2003 PS:lnA 1 flt 1 ,;' ,., ~~ BAIMA & HOLMBERG INC. PRELIMINARY EXHIBIT ,2- PAGE \ -OECaj · _ TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT for Eagle Manor July 11, 2007 ~t~~{) \/~/&B I EXPIRES Baima & Holmberg, Inc. Job No. 45-099 City of Federal Way File #06-106512-00-SU Prepared For Eagle Creek Land And Development, LLC Randy Goodwin 11290 SE 294th St. Auburn, W A 98092 06-106512 ResUBMITTED JAN 1 .0 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH' ISSAQUAH . WASHINGTON' 98027-3817 . (425) 392-0250 . (425) 391-3055 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE "f^G4.E 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 0 2 CONDffiONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY e 3 OFFSITE ANALYSIS II 4 FLOW CON'IROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY '" ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 5 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 43 6 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES 1tf 7 OTHER PERMITs 4~ 8 ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 4~ 9 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND 4~ DECLARATION OF COVENANT 10 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 4% EXHIBIT - \~ _.~ ~'2." P AGE ~O F __,~;.iiiI'~.___ SECTION 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW EXHIBIT . '~ .~ P A,GE~OF__~~~,~"~~- o King County Department of Development and.Environmental Services TECHNiCAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET - Project Owner . \ . E:A6. r.e Cf2ll.tU:;,. Llflvb ~ ~II Address \ L 7....10 fie 1Ji It Ilt Cb r Phone 1\'v~~ ~ Be>-z,#/f '~~~~~~f~~~ft!~,~J,[]%,. .. /_..... ( . ~4i!~mr..,gi :i~p,:RmJ3ATI0~ j., Subdivison" Short Subdivision Grading Commercial Other '!Part 2~PROJECT:LOCATION'AND ;=\~:..;:., 1bESCRIPT,I.QN.: .....:,.".:.'~:.+r:'~..' ':\'~;::';< . Project Name ~6ViI-r k.(~t1 "- Location Township Range .~e....S~ction z.../ ~ - Zlf t$Y1 W-H fZ~"lt2"OL.Fo .~:::j.::::.:.=::i':;::~Ji~f ::'..- :";.~:.'.'.: ::'~~. '~~..~;"!l~li~"" !~;'::z.~'.:~-;J~r.::l;;f.!.i~~W~~S'-I.\\:; . ;!Rart:~~fbtHeRlltE~IEWS:tANO'1HEBMm :~~r :;:':H~.;I\>:~ ;.:: :~;~: .~.'.,::' :'.:.:::;:'::~' ~: ~~'.~~:' ~>.;'~:;.?: :'t ::~~.~:=;:it~~~~~ ~~!f_M;::'?;:~~::f. DFWHpA CaE 404 DOE Dam Safety FEMA Floodplain CaE Wetlands Shoreline Management Rookery Structural Vaults ~es Community .~~tt (9 E:....ffeD1E (JJ<l. L (It. LA Drainage Basin .tpM:~1~~~~~~~~~ffi~~j$ft~~~~~1~~::~i:.:;:;.:.i;,?;rJ.:t:;, :., River Stream Critical Stream Reach Depressions/Swales Lake Steep Slopes w*tr . ;: ~::'3.i;~1:~t(:':-:~.~~;( ~~\-t:'~L~!:1tWt '~;1;.~~':~~;ii~~~~~~-.~~:i'~ Floodplain Wetlands Seeps/Springs High Groundwater Table Groundwater Recharge Other ."'" '2;:< E)(H,~\T- ~ 'i~. ',= P AGt.~-'~-' . -- - 1 ..(~~~'~;'.i~q,g~~f:i::r\;;':i;:.;' Soil Type A~~rtw"po Slopes '3~ , Additional Sheets Attached ';~;:'~;~';: ,_-~.>?..-.,. :'>: ~:.~.~.~~ n' .' y~:~: f>~:: ~.' ,:':'-~. :.:: _." .'.~ ~:. ~', " .' ':'. .....:~. :~E'\~rt~;~j[)EVEItOBMENrliIMI"fAT{ONS:: ;~i::;r..;::.L::~:~..;~:-,' -. '..::::.:~~!-~:...,~.::;::-:~:<.:... -;.. .". '. "~'~>:~~:"'.." ': -~ ~.. REFERENCE Ch. 4 - Downstream Analvsis Additional Sheets Attached Erosion Potential _(1) ~ Erosive Velcoties LIMIT A TION/SITE CONSTRAINT ~Wl-I -~Tl/~'l!;$ ~BJ . MINIMUM ESe REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION -" Sedimentation Facilities .' V Stabilized Construction Entrance J Perimeter Runoff Control ..I Clearing and' Graing Restrictions V Cover Practices V Construction Sequence Other .:.. ~.,.-:.~~~,,:, Jt~fJ~ MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS . . AFTER CONSTRUCTION V Stabilize Exposed Surface ... v' Remove and Restore Tem~orary ESC Facilities I' Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris. II Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas Other EXH\B\---~- ~~:- PAGE- S OF------~~.- IV' ~~~.~'~_9'~sfj~f~~~.wATg~~&~JeM-';~T/"~~':;:' . Grass lined Channel . Pipe System . Open Channel Dry Pond Wet Pond Tank Vault Energy Dissapator Wetland Stream X fi~1L IIWt"T . ,",' . . Infiltration Depression Flow Dispersal Waiver Regional Detention Method of Analysis J2Y>> H CompensationlMitigati on of Eliminated Site Storage Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility '" :'~~~~~~rir~~~~';;:~?-:~:t.:~:t)~~j~~;~'~~:- ... . '. , UQl;U1.I3Al~A"N~m$[ :~~::::-~;~jit~~~~'~:;;'~~;::ff.f.i~i~ :~~;. -~ (p ... Cast in Place Vault Retaining Wall Rockery> 4' High Structural on Steep Slope . Other ~:~.~ '.:: :.' i~.~9ii;'~:~jf;':.~i ..iti..~:.r~~t.~;~~~, .;;8,:;;~~~ :;~W.J.~~~ '-'-. ~art~1:2~aSEN1EN;T:SlIRAGJE. ~~~:~..;;; ::~:~i:~~;~~:~:,j?~l~,jt!f~: ~;:H~-:.t::g~~~~::2:~. Drainage Easement Access Easement Native Growth Protection Easement Tract Other ~~~~;~:;'~':"X~~Ji;~~~~~~~~~~Jt~~~~~~!~~~~f;.1~[~~:j~:~~_:~f~~;~~~:1.1i~~~~ji~~f~.,. .~,~;,~r\:r~~~Ii' t or a civil engineer under my supelVision my supelVision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as obselVed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. Si ned/Date EXHIBIT c~ PAGE b OF: S;~~ a _ ~ Site Location: Gross Site Area: King County Tax Parcel: 21 st Avenue SW/SW 346th Street 135,494 Sq Ft (3.11 Ac) 894720-0120 Project Overview This project involves the development of a 3 .11-acre site into 13 single- fami~ lots. The site is located adjacent to the southwest comer of the intersection ofSW 344 Street with 21 st Avenue SW (there is a small 0.19-acre stormwater tract at the actual intersection, not part of this project). The site is current covered with woods and brush. The site is fairly flat, in general sloping down to the east at about 3%. Per the SCS soils maps, the site is underlain with Alderwood Soil, sandy loam over glacial till. Proposed Stormwater Controls Stormwater runoff from this site (and new/existing frontage paving equal to amount of new frontage paving) will be collected with a pipe/CB system and discharged into an onsite Contech Stormwater Filter vault with ZPG filter cartridges and a V ortSentry pretreatment device will provide the required Resource Stream Protection water quality treatment for the off site storm system, as allowed with the City of Federal Way Blanket Adjustment No.4. Because of downstream capacity problems, a combination Level 2 detention pond and Basic W /Q pond will be built onsite. E.X\-I\B\1- t\~-:- PAGE3-0F- --- f I I I I . _' _ _' _ _. _ _' _ _' _ _' _ _. _ _. _ _' _ _' _ _' _ _. _ _. _ _..--J --s.w. 3~nlr~RE~ .. NI/I'B'tJoT - (!) 242103-llOOlI UGHT IF CHRIST W1HERAH c:HURlJl I til C/ III 2!' "!' SCAlE ,- - III - - - . , C IIA '1lIlE - II . ~= SCMI II ~ I ~ I I~ c EXHIBIT . _l~--i:- PAGE.!LOF- c;~~.~ Site Plan 5 u II~ \1 .... II Sk II \I II 1/ 1/ " 18 '. Age a:===~ II II 11 II II 11 I~:====~I 11 <?}Sk Ewe Osk If=::::;~ I~__.f( --"l ~ ff=====~ ~~ ~I\ 11 11 ~::::::::::::- '^ II II --~--I ~ . Kit ~ on (j:J \\ \~\ Stack T. 21 N T. 20 N Soil Map ~ \lt~V.. .r5-\ .~ ,. . . . .. .- . . . .. .. -+ {C)2llMKIn8C-*J EXH\B\T- -\~-~-=-, .,., (,r: ~ ~ p AGE~,-)r ~c<~~~~- Vicinity Map f SECTION 2 CONDITIONS AND REQUIRMENTS SUMMARY EXHIBIT ~ PAGE-1L\OF__C;.l_v~_ ~ KCSWDM Core Requirements Section 1.2.1 Core Reqmt # 1: Discharge at The N amral Location . The site drainage will continue to discharge to the 36"/42" storm system in 21st Avenue SW. Section 1.2.2 Core Reqmt #2: Offsite Analysis . An offsite drainage analysis is provided in the TIR. Section 1.2.3 Core Reqmt #3: Flow Control . Because of downstream capacity problems, a Level 3 detention pond will be provided for this project. The detention pond facility will be located partially in an onsite stormwater tract and partially in the existing City of Federal Way stormwater tract located adjacent to the northeast corner of the project. The function of the existing RJD pond in the City tract will be provided in the expanded pond facility. Section 1.2.4 Core Reqmt #4: Conveyance System . Onsite conveyance analysis will be provided in the final TIR. Section 1.2.5 Core Reqmt #5: Erosion and Sediment Control . A temporary erosion control plan will provide the required BMP's to be implemented during construction, as required by City code and the NPDES permit to be issued by DOE -to be provided in the final engineering plan set. Section 1.2.6 Core Reqmt #6: Maintenance and Ooerations . A maintenance and operations manual will be provided in the final TIR. Section 1.2.7 Core Reqmt #7: Financial Guarantees and Liability . The developer will arrange for any financial guarantees and liabilities required by the permit. Section 1.2.8 Core Reqmt #8: Water Quality . Stormwater runoff from this site (and new/existing frontage paving equal to amount of new frontage paving) will be collected with a pipe/CB system and discharged into an onsite Contech Stormwater Filter vault with ZPG filter cartridges and a V ortSentry pretreatment device before being released into the proposed, combination Level 3 detention pond and water quality wetpond. Together, these will provide the required Resource Stream Protection water quality treatment, as allowed with the City of Federal Way Blanket Adjustment No.4. KCSWDM Special Requirements Section 1.3.1 Special Reqmt # 1 : Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements . N/A Section 1.3.2 Soecial Reamt #2: FloodplainIFloodway Delineation . The site is outside of any floodplains. Section 1.3.3 Soecial Reamt #3: Flood Protection Facilities . N/A EXHlBlT ___lk----~ PAGE~OF- ;-3- '1 Section 1.3.4 Special Reomt #4: Source Control . Source control is not required for this project. Section 1.3.5 Special Reomt #5: Oil Control . Because the site is a residential project with very limited pollution potential, oil control is not required. EXH\B\1--.-J~"-- ~--- PAGEJ3-0L 'i~ I D SECTION 3 OFFSITE ANALYSIS EXHIBIT l~---- I t.t I l;~ ' PAGE-L-!-OF- - - .. , \ Additional Evaluation of Reported Downstream Problems After the initial Level 1 downstream analysis was conducted, Baima & Holmberg, Inc. was alerted by City staff to possible drainage conveyance problems of the storm drain system immediately downstream of the confluence of the 21st Ave SW system and the 19th Ave SW system (downstream of Fred Meyer), approximately 3/8 of a mile downstream from the site. The City requested Level 3 Flow Control for this project, upgrade the conveyance system in question to provide adequate conveyance capacity, or provide additional analysis that demonstrated that there was not a conveyance problem Hydraulics consultant, Ed McCarthy, was contracted to review the existing analysis of the system to see if there was a problem. Ed McCarthy principally reviewed a hydraulic study referenced and contained in the Saghalie Firs Technical Information Report (July 2006). The analysis was prepared by Taylor Engineering Consultants (July 1998) using the City's SWMM hydraulic model of the conveyance system. Ed McCarthy talked to Lorna Taylor in some detail about the modeling for the conveyance system downstream from Eagle Manor. She did the SWMM modeling for the downstream system for the Courtyard Village project. She based the Courtyard Village model on the City's SWMM model that was used to develop their comprehensive drainage plan. She also developed the City's SWMM model while she worked for KCM, prior to Taylor Engineering. Having worked on the City's comprehensive drainage plan, she was familiar with the basin. She says that the conveyance system near the Fred Meyers has flooded in the past, that the flooding is not just a model prediction. In conclusion, the developer has agreed to provide Level 3 Flow Control for the Eagle Manor project. \1"" \~- E)(H \ B , --.-.~-c; ~ .~ pA.GE.~OE_-- f-j+ Site Location: Gross Site Area: King County Tax Parcel: 21st Avenue SW/SW 346th Street 135,494 Sq Ft (3.11 Ac) 894720-0120 Project Overview This project involves the development of a 3 .11-acre site into 13 single- fami~ lots. The site is located adjacent to the southwest comer of the intersection of SW 344 Street with 21 st Avenue SW (there is a small 0.19-acre stormwater tract at the actual intersection, not part of this project). The site is current covered with woods and brush. The site is fairly flat, in general sloping down to the east at about 3%. Per the SCS soils maps, the site is underlain with Alderwood Soil, sandy loam over glacial till. Levell Downstream Drainage Analysis Runoff from the site drains east to the adjacent stormwater pond (B) or into the west gutter of 21 st Avenue SW (A). A 42" pipe/CD storm system along the west side of 21 st Avenue SW picks up these flows and conveys them about 505' north though a flat- gradient 42" pipe (at 0.6% to 0.8%) where the pipe becomes 36" with a steeper gradient (1.5% to 2.8%)(C). This 36" pipe continues another 1315' north where it becomes a 48" pipe (0.5% to 1.2%)(D). This 48" pipe continues north 230' where it turns east (E), crossing 21st Avenue SW, then continues east through the Fred Meyer packing lot (F), well beyond ~ mile downstream from the site. This conveyance system apparently continues east approximately 600' through the Fred Meyer parking lot, tuning north (G), then about another 600' north to SW Campus Drive (H), then downhill to the east and southeast, possibly along SW Campus Drive (I) about 1 mile to Panther Lake and the regional stormwater facility-approximately 1.75 miles downstream from the site (J). According to the SWM Engineer with the City, there are apparently no drainage problems along this downstream drainageway, except for a possible surchrarging problem to the east of Fred Meyer, not within the downstream conveyance path, but possibly caused by surcharging in the main storm line in the area of (G). In summary, the downstream conveyance system from the site to the regional stormwater facility is apparently not adequate to convey undetained flows from the site to the regional stormwater facility at Panther Lake. UPDATE: There is a capacity problem east of the Fred Meyer parking lot that will trigger a requirement for a Level 3 Flow Control detention pond for this project. \-r I~_~ EX\-\\B ,- ~_\'-'"'~-3-. P AGE.~OF -~ ["2.-- Proposed Stormwater Controls Stormwater runoff from this site (and new/existing frontage paving equal to amount of new frontage paving) will be collected with a pipe/CB system and discharged into an onsite Contech Stormwater Filter vault with ZPG filter cartridges and a V ortSentry pretreatment device will provide the required Resource Stream Protection water quality treatment for the offsite storm system, as allowed with the City of Federal Way Blanket Adjustment No.4. Because of downstream capacity problems, a combination Level 2 detention pond and Basic W/Q pond will be built onsite. EXHIBIT l~.-. I~ , 1;~ ' PAGE-LLOF: .-.<w_~ r, , '" ~f'l .. ~t;} t N r"~ 1<<" ~ ~ :r:> - 'C::::1lJ'~ ~~--; .~'~ \ .~~ \" ~ \:P ~ ~ <..~ ~~~ ~, DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE MAP '"1' . ,[Ij , = 200' . G> m- ~~ ~~ ~" I '\ . I it} 4- N Downstream , D~ainage Map , EXH\B\T- --1'2,... -1". ~1000'% PAGE~OF~- IS . SECTION 4 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN .. ~;~':'~O~k I~ Additional Evaluation of Reported Downstream Problems After the initial Level 1 downstream analysis was conducted, Baima & Holmberg, Inc. was alerted by City staff to possible drainage conveyance problems of the storm drain system immediately downstream of the confluence of the 21st Ave SW system and the 19th Ave SW system (downstream of Fred Meyer), approximately 3/8 ofa mile downstream from the site. The City requested Level 3 Flow Control for this project, upgrade the conveyance system in question to provide adequate conveyance capacity, or provide additional analysis that demonstrated that there was not a conveyance problem Hydraulics consultant, Ed McCarthy, was contracted to review the existing analysis of the system to see if there was a problem. Ed McCarthy principally reviewed a hydraulic study referenced and contained in the Saghalie Firs Technical Information Report (July 2006). The analysis was prepared by Taylor Engineering Consultants (July 1998) using the City's SWMM hydraulic model of the conveyance system. Ed McCarthy talked to Lorna Taylor in some detail about the modeling for the conveyance system downstream from Eagle Manor. She did the SWMM modeling for the downstream system for the Courtyard Village project. She based the Courtyard Village model on the City's SWMM model that was used to develop their comprehensive drainage plan. She also developed the City's SWMM model while she worked for KCM, prior to Taylor Engineering. Having worked on the City's comprehensive drainage plan, she was familiar with the basin. She says that the conveyance system near the Fred Meyers has flooded in the past, that the flooding is not just a model prediction. In conclusion, the developer has agreed to provide Level 3 Flow Control for the Eagle Manor project. EXHIBIT .L..--,,--~ ~, ' PAGE~ OF:. ~- tloA BAIMA & HOLMBERG, INC. 100 Front Staat South ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027-3817 (425) 392-0250 FAX (425) 391-3055 JOB SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY SCAlE 'TP--- OF DATE DATE ::.r:t:!:::t:::~::t-.j :iJj:i~l-:).=t:. ...~-it=l-l:l-rJ::Lh-t::t. 1.::)_-::[:::: " ...,. c," IV IU' i/.J' ". j : i BAIMA & HOLMBERG, INC. 100 Front Steet South ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027-3817 (425) 392-0250 FAX (425) 391-3055 JOB SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE DATE , . . . , . , , . . ,./. ..,... ~~ . . , A . . . . '. UBI.... .? . . . . , . , . . . . . , . . . . :" : i ! Pondcalc Worksheet Rainfall Region Scale Factor: FC Level: {either ST or LA see rainfall regions map} { 0.8 - 1.2 see rainfall regions map} { 1, 2, or 3 see flow control app map} Landcover Adjusted Acres Error Messages type converted cover TF 3.2 TP 0 TG 1.2 EI 2 TF= till forest, TP = till pasture, TG = till grass, EI = effective impervious Acreage Check: gross adjusted post pre 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 EXHIBIT PAGE~OF: I~'~ "". ~l:-~ l'\ Preliminary Contech Stormwater Filter Vault Design Calculations (to be finalized with final engineering plans) For Eagle Manor \k ---, EXHIBIT .... .', ,'w P l\ G E25__C); E..51_.~..~_ ~\Federal Way ~~\;. CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South · PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com DATE: August 12,2005 TO: FROM: Public Works Staff Paul A. Bucich, P.E., Surface Water Mana~1?> -----~ RE: Blanket Adjustment No.4 for Use of StormFilter Products on Residential Sites On December 7th, 2004, SWM issued a Blanket Adjustment for Use ofStonnFilter Products on Commercial Sites. This memorandum is intended to expand this approval to Residential Developments. The criteria for use on residential sites shall be the same as for commercial sites with the exception that use on sites intended to become public is now acceptable. Public Works staff are to reference the previous blanket approval when reviewing any new applications. Vse of compost as the filter media should be weighed against any downstream issues with phosphorus in any lakes. Ifthere is a concern, then compost should not be used and an alternative design or media proposed by the applicant to be reviewed by SWM. In accordance with Section 1.4.3 Adjustment Application Process of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual adopted by the City of Federal Way as amended, this memorandum identifies that the City of Federal Way is accepting the use of StormFilters on public residential sites as a stand-alone water quality treatment BMP for both Basic as well as Resource Stream Protection levels of treatment. .In reference to the December 7th, 2004 approval, strikeout item 2 in the list of issues to be complied with for use ofStonnFilters. Item number 4 shall be re-worded as follows: 4. The design for Resource Stream Protection will utilize a pre-settling device in advance of the StonnFilter and must be capable of bypassing high flows around the treatment system. If the filter system is placed downstream of detention, the detention vault/tank/pond shall be deemed adequate for pre-settling. If placed downstream, the water quality flow rate for treatment shall be the fu1l2-year discharge rate and not the 6-month storm discharge rate. The modeling tool used for sizing the facility must be in accordance with the Department of Ecology' s T AP-E and Technical Review Committee recommendations. Effective immediately, use of the Western Washington Hydrologic Model (WWHM) is approved of for sizing of cartridge system treatment BMP's. EXHIBIT . .. rz.. .' . .W ,3'~ PAGE ~F-"-~=---- 1..\ DATE: December 7, 2004 TO: Public Works Staff FROM: Paul A. Bucich, P.E., Surface Water Manager RE: Blanket Adjustment for Use of StormFilter Products on Commercial Sites In keeping with recent approvals by the Department of Ecology's Technical Review Committee (TRC) on water quality treatment devices, Surface Water Management, in concert with Development Services, has determined that the use of Storm Water Management's StormFilter treatment device utilizing ZPGTM media (zeolite/perlite/granular activated carbon) at 75 GPM in accordance with Ecology's 2001 Stormwater Manual satisfies the criteria for Basic treatment. Further, since the device is already approved of for the second phase of' the treatment train for Resource Stream Protection treatment, it has been determined that the use of the StormFilter with compost media will satisfy the Resource Stream Protection treatment train standard alone without a wet vault, bioswale, or sand filter (see note 4 below). In accordance with Section 1.4.3 Adjustment Application Process of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual adopted by the City of Federal Way as amended, this memorandum identifies that the City of Federal Way is accepting the use of StormFilters on private commercial sites as a stand-alone water quality treatment BMP for both Basic as well as Resource Stream Protection levels of treatment. This only applies to the use of identified media as per the above paragraph; all other media proposed must be individually approved of by the City. This approval requires the following be complied with: 1. The applicant must provide the City a signed maintenance agreement with a term no less than three (3) years at the time of final approval. A draft version must be presented at time of application along with the firm identified to conduct the activity. The City reserves the right to reject the maintenance firm if it is deemed not qualified for this type of maintenance activity. A sample maintenance agreement can be obtained from the City. 2. Use of the StormFilters will only be permitted on private, commercial sites. Use in residential facilities, private or public, will not be allowed unless directed by the City. 3. The applicant must further allow the manufacturer and/or the City access to the device for water quality testing if deemed necessary by either. Test results will not be used to support a case for requiring removal and replacement of the device by the developer or subsequent. If appropriate, test results may be used to encourage expansion or modification in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations for better treatment results. 4. The design for Resource Stream Protection will utilize a pre-settling device such as a StormCeptor, StormGate Separator, or other acceptable alternative in advance of the StonnFilter and must be capable of bypassing high flows around the treatment system. J~~t EXHIBIT ---'. PAGE210F: r;~___:._ c(~ECHe Size and Cost Estimate STORMWATER SOLUTIONS INC. Prepared by Kathryn Thomason on February 26, 2007 '( Eagle Manor - Stormwater Treatment System Federal Way, WA Information provided: . Total contributing area = 3.26 acre . Impervious area = 1.58 acre . Water quality flow, Qwq = 0.2689 cfs . Peak hydraulic flow rate, Qpeak = 1 cfs . Presiding agency = City of Federal Way Assumptions: . Media = ZPG cartridges . Drop required from inlet to outlet = 2.3' minimum Size and cost estimates: The StonnFilter is a flow-based system, and therefore, is sized by calculating the peak water quality flow rate associated with the design storm. The water quality flow rate was calculated by using WWHM with a precipitation scale of 1.0. The StormFilter for this site was sized based on a water quality flow rate of 0.2689 cfs. To accommodate this flow rate, CONTECH Stormwater Solutions recommends using an 8'x16' Storm Filter with 17 cartridges (see attached detail). The estimated cost of this system is $46.000, complete and delivered to the job site. This estimate assumes that the vault is 6 feet deep. The final system cost will depend on the actual depth of the units and whether extras like doors rather than castings are specified. The contractor is responsible for setting the Storm Filter and all external plumbing. Typically the precast Storm Filters have internal bypass capacities of 1.8 cfs. If the peak discharge off the site is expected to exceed this rate, we recommend placing a high-flow bypass upstream of the StormFilter system. CONTECH Stormwater Solutions could provide our high-flow bypass, the StormGate, which provides a combination weir-orifice control structure to limit the flow to the StonnFilter. The estimated of this structure is $4,500. The final cost would depend on the actual depth the unit. r(r./Alr 1m-1r~ N ll> rE>72-- ~ M f /..,~ ~ J;U2-l tv it -(IPAl ~u { fJrtfl f1-l/.Jtr. fLMJ5 -j)lt rrtttJ @2006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions contechstormwater.com Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT ~T;POi'-- .~' PAGE.:ti-OE C;;~_ ~..21~ BALLAST (SEE NOTE 8) ALTERNATE PIPE LOCATION (TYP) (SEE NOTE G) . . ,.' . ~ 'IS .' ,. " Ill' ~ " r" COUPLING (TYP) (BY CONTRACTOR) :~ ~. INLET PIPE (SEE NOTES 5*G) ~'. INLET ." BAY ~.::. ~ ... ... OUTLET BAY 8' x 16' STORMFIL TER - PLAN VIEW G) 30"0 FRAME AND COVER (TYP) (SEE NOTE 4) GRADE RING (lYP) ..~ ';'\ :.......;.:.....', .' :'" 1'" ,. t 31-4" ~ 4'-G" MIN (SEE NOTE 7) PERMANENT POOL UNDERDRAIN MANIFOLD 8' x 16' STORMFILTER - SECTION VIEW (1) 02006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions THE 5TORMWATER MANAGEMENT 5tonnFoItere U.S. PATENT No. 5.322.(;29. No. 5.707.527, No. (;.027.(;39 No. (;.(;49.048. No. 5.(;24.57(;. AND OTHER U.S. AND FOReiGN PATENTS PENDING 8' X 16' PRECAST STORMFIL TER PLAN AND SECTION VIEWS STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING "~IbT-="U. ~~~I...I""'I II STORMWATER SOLUTIONS... ~~ 1 contechstormwater.com DATE: 09/29105 SCALE: NONE FilE NAME: SF816-PC-DTL 112 CHECKED:ARG GENERAL NOTES I) STORMFILTER BY CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUTIONS; PORTLAND, OR (800) 548-4GG7; SCARBOROUGH, ME (877) 907-8G7G; LINTHICUM, MD (8GG) 740-3318. 2) FILTER CARTRIDGE(S) TO BE SIPHON-ACTUATED AND SELF-CLEANING. STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING SHOWS MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CARTRIDGE5. ACTUAL NUMBER REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED ON SITE PLANS OR IN DATA TABLE BELOW. 3) PRECAST VAULT TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C857 AND C858. DETAIL DRAWING REFLECTS DESIGN INTENT ONLY. ACTUAL DIMENSIONS AND CONFIGURATION OF STRUCTURE WILL BE SHOWN ON PRODUCTION SHOP DRAWING. 4) STRUCTURE AND ACCESS COVERS TO MEET MSHTO H-20 LOAD RATING. 5) STORM FILTER REQUlRE5 2.3 FEET OF DROP FROM INLET TO OUTLET. IF LE55 DROP 15 AVAILABLE, CONTACT CONTECH STOR.MWATER SOLUTIONS. G) INLET AND OUTLET PIPING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. PRECAST STOR.MFILTER VAULT EQUIPPED WITH EITHER CORED OPENINGS OR KNOCKOUTS AT INLET AND OUTLET LOCATIONS. 7) PROVIDE MINIMUM CLEARANCE FOR MAINTENANCE ACCESS. IF A SHALLOWER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED, CONTACT CONTECH STOR.MWATER 50LUTIONS FOR OTHER OPTIONS. 8) ANTI-FLOTATION BALLAST TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR, IF REQUIRED. BALLA5T TO BE SET ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH OF BOTH SIDES OF THE STRUCTURE. 9) ALL STOR.MFILTERS REQUIRE REGULAR MAINTENANCE. REFER TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR MORE BALLAST (5EE NOTE 8) 81 X I GI PRECAST STORMFILTER DATA STRUCTUREID WATER QUALliY FLOW RATE (cfs) PEAK FLOW RATE (cfs) RETURN PERIOD Of PEAK fLOW ( # Of CARTRIDGES REQUIRED CARTRIDGE fLOW RATE (15 OR 7.5 m) MEDIA TYPE CSf, PERLITE, ZPG) PIPE DATA: I.E. MATERIAL INLET PIPE # I XXX.XX' XXX INLET PIPE #2 XXX.XX' XXX OUTLET PIPE XXX.XX' XXX RIM XXX X.XX X.XX XXX XX XX XXXXX DIAMETER BAFFLE WALL 30'0 FRAME AND COVER (1YP) (SEE NOTE 4) FLOW SPREADER XX" XX" XX" 8' x 16' STORMFIL TER - SECTION VIEW CD YFWW ~=x< UNDERDRAIN MANIFOLD XXX. XX' -+ LADDER ANTI-fLOTATION BALLAST YES/NO HEIGHT XX" 5'-3" 5'-G" 5'-3" (~r~tt01~?~~8t;~1jt;~1:~(~~l~~~l&f~~J'-K)1;: .: 'f.:\- :;.:t ':.it i~':"'-', !.:' L: ....~ ".'.' ~ .:;:. "'. ;'. .~~ '; :....."'.~ :...;~. ..~ ..... ',,,". :1;:\)< ':.J:. ~~}~~~1~~H3:f~;W':~::," ~;~. ><<'.f:};L~\~~~/ ~ .;. ~ :....~.~\r~;~~:~jt~~H:~~.}J{.: .:I'.:.~. " .-J-f..,:" : ' ., '.' .... '. :'. t. f' .~:,.t j .~C'':::'.!',;'~';~'iI:'' ~ :;.~;:-~. ~:~:,,:~t.t;..:"~\';'~f . 8' ~t~MJ;~W~~~: . ?f.;i~. ~~:~J.;~~~ll~~'~i -'f' .....-... 'l}...... . ..... . .' ""1" 11..:-..- .t., Wijt~J~~~l~~~~~~~~ti~'gf~ IG' THE STO~WATER MANAGEMENT StonnFoIterCI U.S. PATENT No. 5.322,(;29, No. 5,707,527, No. (;,027,(;39 No. (;,b49,048, No. 5,(;24,57(;, AND OTHER U.S. AND FO~IGN PATENTS PENDING 8' X 16' STORMFIL TER - TOP VIEW G) C2006 CONTECH Stonnwater Solutions 8' X 16' PRECAST STORMFIL TER TOP AND SECTION VIEWS, NOTES AND DATA STANDARD DETAIL "'27 DRAWING ,.~~. __~U. "~"I" ; ;;'~I ! STORMWATER SOLUTIONS.. 2 contechstormwater.com DATE: 09129105 SCALE: NONE ALE NAME:SF816-PC-DTL 212 CHECKED: ARG g lil~ ~2 ffl~ 00 IiIS ~~ ~oo 00....1 ~5 oolL -Z ~O tilil ~~ !Zoo ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ o ill ....ow tilii~ z ~~~ ~~w~ -OlDa: ~!5::j~ 1!!....I~1f (/)filooo.. w (/)< ~m~~ ~~ffiru ~~~~ t3lii !I:- WJ:D:a: (/)(,)00 ~~~~ w(,)03: ~w~o gj!:~~ wE~!ll j!:~ ~ 01- Wz o..w !i ~I- lfi~ ....10.. !~ ~o ....13 IL(,) zz ~i gg 00.. w:J zoo ~~ o w~ lD....I ~~ OO!Z~ ooW_ ~:E(,) ~~~ <<000 ~ a: ~ ti ~ ~ ~ 0 W lL W 0 ~ ~ W IL j!: lb !< ~ w 0 lD W ....I 00 ~ :E 00 ~ .... 0.. :J ::E o 0 o (,) ~ iii ~ .... (/) ~ ~ ....I g! -:J ~ ~a: ~oo ~~ (/)....1 ... ...t~ ,lP i ~t~ ~~ a:lUJ Ie; xc:( L.U r~" ti :J a: ti lD o ~ .... ~ z w z o 0.. :E o (,) ~ I!! ~ o zoo ~e J:~ ~~ oo~ ~w oo!Z ltii ~ I 8 ~ ....I lL o 0 ~ ~ w lD N :E in w a: (/) o ~ lL a: 5 ~ 0.. ~ W lD Iii ~ w 0 W 0.. 00 lfi ~ ::; > lD ~ ~ ~ ~ .... a:oo if! ~!Z n: ~w o (,)z ~ ~~ 0: o..:E ui ~8 ~ o z ;:i I!! ~ 00 j!: ~ o W :::i 0.. 0.. :J (/) a: w 8 o ~ W ~ lL ~ o J:o ~~ ~:a! ~~ ui3: <!I Z t :::i W o ~ 0.. o ~ z o ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ 0.. g a: w ~!Z (,)w a::E :J!!:: 0..:J .0 OlW a: o of 50 ~:E o . o..:E tiia ~~ i=~ :J....I ....I OiD 00'" a:~ w... ~5l ~~ ~r;; 0- I-W oo:E i):i I!!g z~ 80 )olD lD~ ~~ !!~ o;?;~ >~~ ~l... 1151 ~ - ... N> ;, li!Z ~:5 j~ ~ WI- ~~ at:; enQ -.... w ....I ~ 0.. ~ !:! ,,;. '& L z o i= (,) W en W ~ CD en II z o ~ W en g? c;; fljQ. ~~ Co 6'cn ~w en: N~ 18ii) a!!! ~! ~ F:' ~6:' ;-~ ~i o I- en ~ :> ~ In :E w t/) t/) c( ::E~ WID ....~ en d >-~ en if! f- .... ~ zoo w:J ::E::E E~ ...Jo:::OO <(....> .... 0::: @) ~w~ c~.... o:::~z ~::Em zo:::~ ~~o enen> ----, I I I I ___.J F:' 8z ~:i !'i' '" ----, I I I I ___-3 :E !il 8 ~oo W 00 z i z lD ~ ..., Q W W.. z Ill! ~ ~ (,) ~ Iii ~ ~ ~ ~ !< 00 Q (,) u: 0 ~c: ~ ~,_ g E ~rl ~; .... a: '" ~ ~r~~ I ~I" ~ ~ ~Lf' ~ c.>> ~ W en ~ ~zw _J: wo -~Q >_w Z ;;0 O I-Z _z~ I-:Jw C(~2! >Q!:J wwll1 ...J f- I!! W:a!w :E :::i ....I :E s ~s ll~ oi~ Ziti) Q I:>~ I- ~8 (J ::) ! it e: tit ~ ri- o l~i ~ ist f2 ~Ii Q IBJ:,!! W (,)"" Q wO z !Z~ W J:8.!/1 I- (,)!!!-lO Z ~='O _ !z at1:: 1-8.5!, o ~1~ Z )~s ; iii o si' ffi l~ i,. t/) '5~ i o! .", ~ lil~ ~ I~ll z 11'0 Q ~J: ~ ; i 1111 a::'O~1l! ~ Ilil'" a::!!.i o .ell! 'Z-h u.. ~ !oJ ~lli t=i....~ ~ :> W Q ii) I- u.. W ...J WESTERN WASHINGTON HYDROLOGY MODEL V2 PROJECT REPORT Project Name: Site Address: City Report Date Gage Data Start Data End Precip Scal.e: Eagle Manor Federal Way 2/26/2007 Seatac 1948 1998 1. 00 PREDEVELOPED LAND USE Basin Fl.ows To GroundWater: Land Use TILL PASTURE: Basin 1 Point of Compliance No Acres - 3.26 DEVELOPED Basin Fl.ows To GroundWater: Land Use TILL GRASS: IMPERVIOUS: LAND USE Basin Point No 1 of Compliance Acres 1. 58 1. 68 RCHRES (POND) INFORMATION ANALYSIS RESULTS Fl.ow Frequency Return Return Period 2 year 5 year 10 year 25 year 50 year 100 year Periods for Fl.ow(cfs) 0.100742 0.158119 0.196041 0.242854 0.276642 0.309391 Predevel.oped EXHIBIT~ !\.~~~~ ~I= e;-2. -,--.~. ~,7~,:.",.. Fl.ow Frequency Return Periods for Devel.oped Unmitigated ~t Return Period 2 year 5 year 10 year 25 year 50 year 100 year Flow Frequency Return Return Period 2 year 5 year 10 year 25 year 50 year 100 year Flow (cfs) 0.500901 0.632932 0.720821 0.832991 0.917612 1. 0033 Periods for Developed ~tigated Flow (cfs) 0.500901 0.632932 0.720821 0.832991 0.917612 1.0033 Peaks for Predeveloped and Developed-~tigated Yearly Year 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 Predeveloped 0.114 0.264 0.225 0.078 0.061 0.085 0.141 0.132 0.117 0.102 0.083 0.170 0.083 0.054 0.081 0.087 0.075 0.076 0.152 0.089 0.092 0.082 0.084 0.197 0.079 0.085 0.150 0.091 0.017 0.081 0.044 0.123 0.075 0.193 0.110 0.075 0.039 Developed 0.533 0.903 0.555 0.403 0.387 0.484 0.503 0.481 0.588 0.505 0.380 0.502 0.432 0.413 0.428 0.496 0.432 0.439 0.658 0.726 0.406 0.440 0.425 0.676 0.395 0.458 0.631 0.411 0.462 0.627 0.579 0.571 0.604 0.853 0.561 0.462 0.402 EXHIBIT-!k P.AGE~~_OF~~,__.~ z,~ 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 0.181 0.169 0.066 0.038 0.268 0.222 0.082 0.083 0.027 0.110 0.223 0.206 0.062 0.586 0.687 0.306 0.385 0.972 0.881 0.453 0.286 0.330 0.448 0.628 0.571 0.576 Ranked Yearly Peaks for Rank Predeveloped 1 0.2684 2 0.2643 3 0.2254 4 0.2229 5 0.2224 6 0.2059 7 0.1967 8 0.1927 9 0.1809 10 0.1695 11 0.1692 12 0.1516 13 0.1502 14 0.1407 15 0 . 1323 16 0.1229 17 0.1167 18 0.1136 19 0.1097 20 0.1095 21 0.1019 22 0.0921 23 0.0914 24 0.0886 25 0.0870 26 0.0852 27 0.0848 28 0.0844 29 0.0829 30 0.0828 31 0.0826 32 0.0824 33 0.0821 34 0.0810 35 0.0807 36 0.0793 37 0.0777 38 0.0764 39 0.0754 40 0.0750 Predeveloped and Developed-~tigated Developed 0.9720 0.9026 0.8809 0.8527 0.7262 0.6868 0.6764 0.6580 0.6308 0.6281 0.6269 0.6036 0.5883 0.5861 0.5791 0.5763 0.5714 0.5712 0.5614 0.5553 0.5332 0.5047 0.5031 0.5024 0.4958 0.4840 0.4810 0.4620 0.4618 0.4581 0.4526 0.4481 0.4405 0.4393 0.4321 0.4317 0.4281 0.4246 0.4132 0.4110 n l' \" .r- 'XL' , 1..'::' - --~--" C r'ILJ __~.__r~"' '" f> A.GE!B-OF ~~----- ~q 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 0.0748 0.0656 0.0624 0.0610 0.0538 0.0445 0.0392 0.0382 0.0274 0.0165 0.4060 0.4033 0.4020 0.3951 0.3869 0.3848 0.3801 0.3300 0.3064 0.2864 1/2 2 year to 50 year Flow (CFS) Predev 0.0504 3961 0.0527 3610 0.05493340 0.0572 2972 0.0595 2755 0.0618 2536 0.0641 2253 0.0664 2088 0.0687 1948 0.0709 1807 0.0732 1609 0.0755 1497 0.0778 1390 0.0801 1250 0.0824 1165 0.0847 1086 0.0869 1019 0.0892 931 0.0915 879 0.0938 822 0.0961 749 0.0984 711 0.1007 671 0.1029 636 0.1052 575 0.1075 548 0.1098 518 0.1121 476 0.1144 445 0.1167 416 0.1189 394 0.1212 365 0.1235 350 0.1258 330 0.1281 302 0.1304 278 0.1327 261 0.1349 249 0.1372 231 0.1395 215 0.1418 209 0.1441 195 0.1464 189 F:i.nal 20652 19806 19017 17917 17181 16515 15607 15051 14529 13999 13271 12816 12382 11768 11417 11062 10668 10089 9730 9414 8924 8647 8380 8117 7696 7464 7249 6894 6688 6478 6285 5974 5781 5597 5334 5163 4996 4852 4624 4501 4387 4193 4076 Percentage 521. 0 548.0 569.0 602.0 623.0 651.0 692.0 720.0 745.0 774.0 824.0 856.0 890.0 941.0 980.0 1018.0 1046.0 1083.0 1106.0 1145.0 1191.0 1216.0 1248.0 1276.0 1338.0 1362.0 1399.0 1448.0 1502.0 1557.0 1595.0 1636.0 1651.0 1696.0 1766.0 1857.0 1914.0 1948.0 2001. 0 2093.0 2099.0 2150.0 2156.0 Pass/Fa:i.l Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail. Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fa i.l Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail EXHIBIT_~~_._~, PA.GE~OF_,'fI.~_ ;'0 0.1487 180 3961 2200.0 Fail 0.1509 175 3837 2192.0 Fail 0.15.32 160 3666 2291. 0 Fail 0.1555 157 3553 2263.0 Fail 0.1578 146 3457 2367.0 Fail 0.1601 132 3304 2503.0 Fail 0.1624 123 3206 2606.0 Fail 0.1646 111 3133 2822.0 Fail 0.1669 105 3046 2900.0 Fail 0.1692 92 2911 3164.0 Fail 0.1715 84 2837 3377.0 Fail 0.1738 77 2770 3597.0 Fail 0.1761 71 2679 3773.0 Fail 0.1784 66 2604 3945.0 Fail 0.1806 60 2534 4223.0 Fail 0.1829 54 2482 4596.0 Fail 0.1852 47 2367 5036.0 Fail 0.1875 43 2288 5320.0 Fail 0.1898 39 2229 5715.0 Fail 0.1921 34 2132 6270.0 Fail 0.1944 32 2077 6490.0 Fail 0.1966 30 2022 6740.0 FaLl. 0.1989 27 1967 7285.0 Fail 0.2012 25 1890 7560.0 Fail 0.2035 23 1842 8008.0 Fail 0.2058 20 1792 8960.0 Fail 0.2081 18 1733 9627.0 Fail 0.2104 17 1699 9994.0 Fail 0.2126 17 1650 9705.0 Fail 0.2149 14 1612 11514.0 Fail 0.2172 11 1547 14063.0 Fail 0.2195 9 1511 16788.0 Fail 0.2218 9 1465 16277.0 Fail 0.2241 6 1409 23483.0 Fail 0.2264 5 1372 27440.0 Fail 0.2286 5 1336 26720.0 Fail 0.2309 5 1302 26040.0 Fail 0.2332 5 1263 25260.0 Fail 0.2355 5 1232 24640.0 Fail 0.2378 5 1199 23980.0 Fail 0.2401 5 1159 23180.0 Fail 0.2424 5 1137 22740.0 Fail 0.2446 5 1106 22120.0 Fail 0.2469 5 1082 21640.0 Fail 0.2492 5 1047 20940.0 Fail 0.2515 5 1019 20380.0 Fail 0.2538 4 999 24975.0 Fail 0.2561 4 958 23950.0 Fail 0.2584 4 931 23275.0 Fail 0.2606 4 909 22725.0 Fail 0.2629 4 883 22075.0 Fail EXH I B IT __\k~~~'--~"7 0.2652 2 843 42150.0 Fail 0.2675 2 824 41200.0 Fail ~/~,r ,,~ 0.2698 0 800 n/a Fail PAG E _,J r _.--- .,~~-~-~," 0.2721 0 771 n/a Fail 0.2744 0 754 n/a Fail 0.2766 0 737 n/a Fail ;1 The deve10pment has an increase in f10w durations from 1/2 predeve10ped 2 year f10w to the 2 year flow or more than a 10% increase from the 2 year to the 50 year f1ow. The Deve10pment Has an increase in flow durations for more than 50% of the flows from the 2 year to the 50 year f1ow. Water Qua1ity BMP Flow and Volume. On-1ine facility volume: 0.2522 acre-feet On-1ine faci1ity target flow: 0.252 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0.2689 cfs. Off-line facility target flow: 0.1394 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0.1487 cfs. This program and accompanying documentation is provided 'as-is' without warranty of any kind. The entire risk regarding the performance and results of this program is assumed by the user. Clear Creek Solutions and the Washington State Department of Ecology disclaims all warranties, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to implied warranties of program and accompanying documentation. In no event shall Clear Creek Solutions and/or the Washington State Department of Ecology be liable for any damages whatsoever (including without limitation to damages for loss of business profits, loss of business information, business interruption, and the like) arising out of the use of, or inability to use this program even if Clear Creek Solutions or the washington State Department of Ecology has been advised of the possibility of such damages. E-."':/'~'IB'.. ~T \~ }t' ,..~j . '!i _ .. _..__.__-_ J''\.. ~ · I, - ... ---- p AGEU,Or= ~-~-~~ ~t- Original Strormwater Pond Design Calculations For Virginia Hills E)(H\B~ _0&-:: PAGE ~ ., ~/,I?AI r y t J Cl, t1lt~J 9/291 ) ) V I fll< (,vI f\ ~ M I lit ~ ) tv .....----... -.... . t': /...., toO ... ,. J" ........ . -.... ~ " '.: '. ~ : ~ .. .' ~,... ..'-. :. .....r - "" - -: ..." .. ( I. ."" -.. .. ( - -~ ~ -..... ~..",.' 'r .. r .... - , - .........,.. - ..... -..' :'" ~v~ (U { ^.Ni)(V r/ ~~' t ~ t /" . r" . ~ I . ~l\5~ / ~ l, I ~ l;: ,; I . l- I T'''. -""'1', -.....:- ..,. . . c.~': > .~. .; ...... . -.6~' . 'J ~ ~ V IKgI Nt A )71 LL': VI R6uJt A H-ILLC: 21 AV~ 5.w.$'5.W. 344: Dlv. 5.-TB. 59>E~ 3/ 8~ D.k... VI ~ UJ {l. ~ ~ (}) :'\ ~ ~ . ~ \J:> ':5 ~ ~ - ) ~~ ' ~~~ 2/ ST AVE. S. if( ~ )> EXH\B1T ~-=--~ ~1 -" ~, >>~t:: ,}1-__ 7 F /).t~ 1_..." ;'t ~3 z: ) ;>;::~ .Vl >!II :'::f;):>..' "(~f~\:, ," '<,.:_ ~..'.o:.~, .. ," '", ';.: . .... -'.-. . .~. . ;" ~~~";t.< .~'.... _' . .,..~.~ ~.. -, ". . '. . ",,'-:.;' '? ,...~.'~., .. t., ," :" '-'.;? .{ ~. t. , . (/;"':,>,;L 'j. '. .' . ....." " '. ...\ ,'. :': ..':,-.. t I , oP t .. 4 2 . ..t Y >------Y ~ r. -17 J. ~'/ c 5E Cfl.':)J>J B- J!. ",," ,,+ ---_.J 'L -----tV --.-\ D vI( --- --~rrI =}' r __ I; ..;;;./-. . ~- ....~/ ~?~dO' =. .:.....t-ho....., ) I 4'~ ~! I lL 1 I . /051 .2/t2~h c.(.J(;~]- B / /. e. . <f66.5'0 J ~~,&' /2" a".".,t1 €} $% E ,~ -::1' /"t2t/&t'nht?/7 ?//~6'&1? ?!l ~/h~ Wt!J/'.t O.l1-ffiff S//tZ. I 1!I.slrOlw O*!Ir.$ M01// ~I f'.; ::~er:fo/ ~ dvr/1!{ I I I ~ /~.t__, EXH I BIT'l ~&;,-;'~' PAGE~OF:-- , -<~,' " N / ", . O. ,Jo'LT- /' .tba- .7 ~~~ ~ if/ ~ "., ". ' N ~ I a-I ty , ,v/.,.~.L-#e__.______.:-_1, '!1'lf?f" . '0> '0#"./ , . . . J';"'" ~. 111,., "....1. .., .1 .~. ., ".,,' j, onRr:'DT D C:dnl t='R L A~~n~ !;HEET NO f~.JL. OF ./ JOl ---'_'~'6JJJj'-'.M . ROBERT R. SADLER & ASSOC. SHEET NO / OF 7 31216 Pacific Highway South CALCULATED BY Wf~5 DATE FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 (206) 941-1599 CHECKED BY DATE \ (hi? NP 7g-03.8 SCALE -.- s. W. 344- rH9 7:' _ .,. _ ... /Soar- -- !I~ ~llt t 0:: 0 - ... -_.~~c.'" I:::J r" -= loch:. 1 ~ .. 8 \J) j/I .L. -..5Ire: De:sc,/Z/pnOlV d/lch \ \ \ I I 4nza .: 8. ~ A~...t 0\ ~ -- -' ~ --- --- ----- I~ '> "'C ... -J IJ)\ C.6. ~ -~ /2':J7! ~ ",... .Tne sik drains 8el"}~ra/& (Zas/~'!yJ C7 s/?:1t:9// t:9r~a 0/ dff'OJrinni1lt:'& /.i? "c~.s /7D#1/ dr.->in.s:lo ,tAt:' NQoo~h~.s"l"'ry CD,,,e-,.- J c9 loc.->/ o"~'ess/on,7 C~t:"n /,/c."".s 0/ a,.-.,nd' .sf:'7&''i:!I~ '70 .~.:: Cur biJ"~ .1101:1 Jhe .:sov/-ht!",,,. 1YW 0/ S.)1/. .34-4!4 51. A f fhe /}o,IIJ~.;1S'/~"r CoI"If#'",.. 0/ /-),-e ,s.i,Lc: .;JJ?eI af -In&" sou/IJ .:"<i1skl"" c.orA.t!'~ Dr fht!' s;lc aN: /o~,;1II:"c/ C:1,1ch bi)$//?s J 0" OJ 4-2",pf 'sPI"hJ drai/J h'ne. lb~se. C,11r:.6 bvS'iA,.S now rt:'c./c-v.c ;I/Je s/orH/ /"Uno//" Inn,., Ihes/I-c", JIfC/V~15' rile 0$,.,,6// .:st.>b-"c-c/ .ro Ih~ JVC!"sl_ vi6 .::? rt:>ao'sio'c- O",'kh 0" S.w. .3~ Z!" .sr. ..5&; ExA/lJil.:;s. .4-"" ~~'Ati1',. ,.pA7~' 4- .,SJt:v_ 0'11;"..P~ r:9#~'r~~d .,brdcl'C/;!-ieuJ;/ de-r_...1'.s. Anra = 8.,3. Ac:rrz.s t ....:zz: u.ExlsnNf; C ONDJTICiVS .lime 0/ Ca'KJ!"~,t;-a.f.io/7 est!"(: exlt/bif A.:) - ...... ) A -P- t:5 ;;J At:/~~ = 43+ - 38~ - ~81f ORM 204 Available lrom II\I&ss/'NC Townsend. Mess 0'469 EXHIBIT---l~~ " C;~ .. ROBERT R. SADLER & ASSOC. ROBERT R. SADLER & ASSOC. 31216 Paclftc Highway South FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 (206) 941-1599 SHEET NO JUt; L. OF / SHEET NO z.. OF 7 CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE -, SCALE .:zz: Conf. /~/IJ = 570 ./~~r 48 slope: = .570 = 8.4 % .B.~C J /~111tJ=5~O /-1 Ll e/~v =- 38te. - 3 70 - IcP/f /~ sl0j7c "'.560 re. 9 % F/owlim~ (hC1A? Ch,p,.1- 1 j?1CJ Kc. AlD1/1V~V c/6,....sr ry/h.a'/. 0,.. ..........,oIo-V 8,4-% = 0.7.5 ~s. .z. ~ ;I.; =04-3 rjP 5, .570 A -fr- 8 =@27~60 = /2..7 In//) 5(;.0 . B ~. c. =(O~.2X'''''0> =- z/. ? n7il'} '\ r /0 m//? CW~#,~ 1/n?9 f /2,? I- 2/.? = 44. tI ,;n.l/;L/.J~ 45 k ::- 45m;/7 .li1/~"Si 6' .sinc!: sHe '<.50 /fc,-e-s dSSV~~ /0 yr /rr?ve''''c? .v.se )'jrJet:1"-7g . Int',-n,s,;!y C",yvC:; .~ .,4.-:....4.5 /?2/"'?; ==0. 7 /o/4r .EXiSfi"CJ.. /eCN10/'/ nc lor -/'rom T8ble f. P Nt J S~rst: 7k-c:.s 18/"VU'ld Qv'";-- oJ YD//i1:1 ~}.. ..C:-.o.zo. EXH\B'T~~~~~ p A E~OF_~--- 'ORM 204 Available trom !Nf?:eS/Itf<;. Townsend, Mass 01469 / onorOT 0 CAnl ~D R, Ac:c:n~ !':HFFT NO JOB =3 =3 OF / ROBERT R. SADLER & ASSOC. 31216 Pacific HIghway South FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 (206) 941-1599 SHEET NO OF ? CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE E.conl. t?~-CLA /: (b.2q){O.?J(8,5!J ::: /.25 CES ..!llr.. . Pr'F~ Cc::nt:6'/-/ons Tks;/c d~Vt!"/opAf~,,;I ~YO'posed' .has f/ /0.-1.:5 N) rlJ~ we'".sft"l'"/r ~o %.t '0/ /he s;f~ /Dr S p",s/''Y t:)/ z. 0 ./ob/Ae,c, The SOImtr d'HSJIy will be: t/Je'Q" /n c.,/~:.,Ii1fj1:! :ii,e ullihl..Jh d,-"sJ',y IDJ'" ?;:1er ';4" ,;).s$_i~ ;11M; SO}H}j;;,'7 St'"I'V~rS fvSt!"r"e #tc sift.. 1'"",/1 ./;Jc1' 6Jv.,;I:J,e,k /n fb~ h,;",~ ;i1J"J 0I11"''''1! oIl!'vI!'IOP","~r. Art:" i} . =-8, 9 A-c.rc:.s .L/r,;>,'''.y~11d//be: /oft:'I"C-C/'f<!':d'//} C) Spr*1 0',.,;'1 syS7'COn7 h? ,rhe av/'o't:!"~.$CjIc. ii'm:/c..>,r;t<>oI in CA4..P. .:Jlo'1:! rnert:'.)r ./of /it1t'",S oT.' /ols ~.?. 8.. ~. ~/O I ., 7h?~ cpr C2;"'1cc,, Ira :lion (s~!:e.dJ/.b;fA ') Assume: /0 mi/J Wt:"II/'t1lrvna// 7/AlC ~ c,a...t C8:J ~ C.8~, knrlh ::' 1'30 '.r assumc s/~"t:?-x:. CB? .,.. CI3.3 /t'"7fh :' 50 ' r ..;1~.sv"'c slo,o ~ =' Z% CI3.1.~ ~1J3 c40fi. @ ;:'%. ""'" 8s.S'v",~ J/~/C1C;1t - cFPS .240. 2.~O - c'/77ia EXHI8IT_.___~~ -.'__ 'PA.GE~~.~)F_r!_. ,.__ \ --~.. d C.(33 .'~.avrN// / ~.n}n/.b, ::4-50 f:t- .. ...d ssvme v.- r lilc'7 ".. C 1i""")""'.S .s/cpc- :- Z;' /a t 36 KUtst.1"<1 1"<. ~f\ULt.t( & f\~~U~. SHE;n NO --r OF I , --- --~-- , ROBERT R. SADLER & ASSOC. SHE;n NO 4- OF 7 31216 Pacific Highway South CALCULATED BY DATE FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 (206) 941-1599 CHECKED BY DATE ---.... SCALE -1lL ~nf. 450 . = 3.8 h?;rj (Z)Cc.-V k ..fr:> oufr~/J '" 10 ".,;n 'I- Z m;" -I- 3.8 ".,J/'] = /5.8 v.Je /(;, ~i/J a/hll fe> r~/~"f/Qn .sf'Jf~," .. 550 /.E V~e" ~;i('"h (!!? /.8.'70:t OJ .sSVAte' tie' /ocit ~Z FPS 5'50 (2XfoO) 4. ~ In;/') .7:.:: I~ d 4: (, : Zo, (, U.5t: cOh'?//J Z; IV,. Q"~....,./~qI' ). ~e;om8 .1-,;,./JIc: .7;0 :- 10 1/1 YQr .Rv'7o/E .Eac/Qr . r/'rPh1 J::.C, M;J"v~/ /.5-.- 3,0 !.2i//(jA:: 0..3..5 . //7~" .cp It" CIA = (C;.35)(i.C!J{8.C:V :: 3/ C'r:5 ... ..::nL pSTOeA.GE .. .KE9U'~eJVT.s . As.s."mer~/~nliQ? ;t:>OoI'7eY /n. N..e: Co,.,.,r,- eJ/ ~,;h:: t;)ALI.I)Wtfl!1.l.6. =. /. 2.5 CE.5 . - ).......................tPo:=:' /'Z5 ..-0,40 CFS /Ac;,c..C (B,~.JC C),3:z) ..~ EXHIBITJ-, . GE~OF.rt" .. r._nr-n-r I':) C"^r'\1 r'1':) P ACCnr- "'L~"'~'T ......... .-5 u OF '/ JOB SHEET NO .-5 OF 1 CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE ~ ROBERT R. SADLER & ASSOC. 31216 Pacific Highway South FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 (206) 941-1599 '\ ]!I. Cant k;svVloteOrificc CondjJ..lOtl . '~'J7loZ T = -:Z5 + .0,,40 T= 41.37 lJ~t: 41,4 Y~'Itn Vs = C?8ZD) (41,4) @/.4)+lz5) 40 (0.40) (f1.4) Vs'::: 1095,.9 . U~ IO~(o FT3 ..........VTOTAL= 009~>'C?~)(CO.3~ -\ ..V1bTA" -= 34-14-. u ~c:.34-Z0 FT.3 .I ..... CHTL):/ Srz.1 J-1 G .~:>{3n dlfch 16.... /77&X df!"~~/~oI cp (3./) -c.r::5 .x t:?Osal't'"Iy . i'uclor ::: ~. Z CF.5., C hanne I is. .530 li.t I~ ; slope =- 37B-;3Co7..!S 830 .;slope =- I =:;8 t/.se C 70 0; .s" o. o~ )( ..02ssume chat'lnd sc:ztion -') 1 . /C" · f 'ORM 20" Availabte from ,NeSS/tNe Townsend. Mass 01469 JOB '. ROBERT R. SADLER & ASSOC. 31216 Pacific Highway South FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 (206) 941-1599 SHEET NO ~ OF ? CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE --\ SCALE .: Y. Conr -from ~u;~ tor Ur.;-h->vWl {bo if) ore" chDlt1ntl~ '.4&0 A r 7';3~YZ. Q~ n . . , n :::0.030 depth Q. "cdcc'~ 0.4- .0..5 a.G, 0.7 .0,6 0.&d3 CFS /.r,r; CFS . 3. 4-4 CF;s 6.38 CFS /0.88 c,cs .; 4-Z FPS Z.2/ F;:>5 3./~ F~ 4. 31-- rr:s .s~7 rP5 from observo:>>+ion i+ Olppe;)YS fha+ th~ ch~nrll'1 ~s dl!"~~~d ). t.u~ l\ safe '~ C;)rTlj f~", WtOY'ctholll'l u'e ewFc-k-d rw.oJf. wi-l-h w velociht u.,dc:,..5 fp=>. . E OeJF"CE. SrzlNq ge~v\f"c:d t"c:len-Hor. volvWle 10 be 51ore-d in openfoY)c:f 5S' )( 45' wi 3: 1 sides neB lectine,. s.Jope.::a +ni~ r~solh. If} a ..-erui..-cd d e'P-J-h of '.4 feet 1: .-fcS+O..-e 3420. FT3 botloWl of ~d ele-\l: ~7, 00 'fop of FOf'Id <! 10'1'" s'to..ItI. =.,3<OB.4- .leolJt of roll~~io., ~pi)v~~/rC'st"ic:+r.H" -s.trvd"..c =. 3ee."6.0 head = 3~ 8, 4: - ,3'=:. (0,0 '::" 2,4 . '-r~" \ ~. . _;...:.....----. ... '. . "L.l '8\ , . .,.=~ . .. E"nl, l-i -Fc-:lJj PAGE~ _O~ O' Available from {NcBSI 'Ne Townsend, MISS 01469 ~, i_ '\ L.. , .... .. n,_IoI.....' I .,. "",,1.1........, '-X "....""_~. ;:)"I:t:1 NU "ROB'ERT R. SADLER & ASSOC. 31216 Pacific Highway South FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON .98003 (206) 941-1599 SHEET NO CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY SCALE Jl[. c....... u ~int ot'i fiCA.. fol""'lda C~O,CoZ. /.25 a = 0 idZ -(2~) t?4 .8: O./v FT2 _ f (4)(0.1(".) d~ .. Tr d: 0, 4.5 3 " ~ 5 78 orilJce .JZJL lto.rn=~IM SY..s.T~M . ur 7 ') OF DATE DATE Uhll2er~p~d re"h~~.J-iOVl 5L-t~l-t:"W)./ w',-\-h 9YClW \,.;1./("5 d'rO""Id .itlleJ P'f~ -to CoI1~J M-I ~ l'vovidc F ilf...a+ioJ'l. 5~s~1.N1 s.Ltovld be. p("dodi~II'1 clc:dJlted dvrir, c..o...~tI"VC ho.... .c3lkd UpO"t &ott4p Ie 1-; 01') of work.. ORM 204 Available from lNf?:Ssj'Nc Townsend. Mass 01469 EXHIBIT-- D-~-~ PAGEflOF- '" J~H f~ SECTION 5 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANAL YSIS AND DESIGN EXHIB'T \~-_._--:-~ PAGE'tct O~----- ~1 - ... ' SECTION 6 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES EXH\B'l~~.- 'Or " PAGE~OF- ~ if1 SECTION 7 OTHER PERMITS EXH\Brr~~-- pp..GE92-0F~ .. . '-- SECTION 8 ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ~;~I:gLO~ . ~~ '-- SECTION 9 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT l~- EXHIBIT . ........ '. . _ ~ ['~ , f\ r'"' r.- ,~1 1=='._c;:)..---- . ... ..... SECTION 10 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL H\B\T ,~~,. EX ~~_.. pA.GE~OF: 15 .,- va. )H) AS ollt lI'J. g 10 lI'J. . toIlCl/tO 1I'J. B :'E a:s: OW Z(l') <(~ :E o:::~ Z WN ...Ii " ~Z <( ~o Wu~ UJZ u. CI) :E O u. CI) 0< """~ - . I- T'" >- <( ~~ ...I UJ ...J Q.~ ffi u. > ofa a: :i u. T'" "<("~.... Zz c---:W -J: ...Iu. Wo a:~ c.~ o a.. NOUolADSiO J.IGrIrIOO......OllJdStlCH$lo\3ll J.rGftJI)O.u&:lVUINOlSr.Jll lNJl9lO:lAlOlSdSNOlblJll Ii: 'Hl".1. J.8 Q3Nf)1S](J NV1d 3115 ~DNVI'l 31:>V3 Wl~ ~n _NO:> 1DHS 'OUI 6J8qWIOH Ii _WI_8 J.803litcBtlol 011 'J.N3l'ld013A30 1lI ONV1 )t33~ 31f>V3 - ,">'<>lId III ~~ ~i ~ ~!= lb. ~'o .Ii m~" I !.~ o~.. ~ I ~ J.=I Ii 11 ~ !!i: ! S I I i.b ~s1 I; ~h~ i~ i ~ .n~;~ ~b ~. Ii ~n~=~ - I! i U "2 $. o ~ ! ,"1- ~!i!i ~:i il~!~ R~.~~ ~l!~ 'U" Uh~ ih M~ i! ~. J~ i! i~ I!~I ~ih II ! .iil~ un II i l---~-_--1 I sa I ~~ i .I!l a :z:'" Ii ~el " 0. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . . I --------1. I ! I I I I I I I I I I I III . I . ~.' i i I! I ~ d a 3 q . ~ Ii I--L ~~ ~~~ ~~. ~l~ e~~ ~ ~ !! .~ :>~IJ 8l~~ a: fi I! I !~ i ~. B ~ .~ Ii i it I i. ~ ~ " " ~~ , " it ~ ~ ~ .' L<EI<lil . Ji \~ _, u! \~, t::-\ ~~ )(<( wn. 05- 05- -------------, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I S;l I ~ I OJ :z: U I ::l I U I iii JJ}I~ '" !ii " ~ 31.'10 )It() AS t%llt lI"J. Rt IO/HlIW) lI"J. lit 10/70 lI"J. lit NOll,."S3O J.N3JI'IQ3JJ.Cl OII$Nl1$\)l1 J.IGIfIIIXlJJ.t:)llJdSNOllt\3M I lJGMOO JJ.l:) Il3d StClQ\3lI t 1fl"J. AS lDMDlSlO 'OUI 6J8qWIOH Ii 8WI88 ""_...... ~ I , I bi ~Ii~~ m !!~~~ iB.l~ ~i~ .t!~~ ml~ i~~ M~ 1. I i! ~~ r' ~" I! i~ 1m ~ih ~~ ~~~ ~.~ 5j8 5~~ I ~gi ~. I!ir II! . ~:~! ~ Ii ~ .nm l! i I ~m:i~ ~ ~ ! II ~ ~ w C") (!) z a: z r ~ ~ : ~k_ '-----g----- : ~ III ::1 '-'l---h----I-- I.. J I I z I I +-_~---I i I ~ I I . 0. ~ I ~ !:: I I I i 'i I ; ~ I ~ .. I ,~ I ~Il I 1:: i I ~ I Ii : ~ , . I i ~: I I ~ I I ~L -,;00-_.- T: - - - !-,;;;;:,;;o;,- ~ - - - _1__ ~--- - -- ---- -- ----gr-- - . . ~ i "li~~ 'M,:s....3nN3A. "1-l.SJ.Z "-,"L.i'i '.~-- ..... ('II L1. o z o ~ o a.. riJ !II~ "~nl ~f~' .1 : I I I n .1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I rll . . 1 ! ~.' i \i! I ea~ Iii i ~ ~ . . i ~ ~ ~ ~"l<ll<EI l:IONVr4 :nlV3 NVld E)NIOV~ li .unlln 1\fnJ.d30NOO lN31NOO mHS 011 'l.N3r4d013II30 li ON'Vl >l33~ :nlV3 ..- , ~ hi!. II .~ !~i 61 i~ II~.i i.~~ fj~ ~i U u" g~~1 I~i ~r "~ "~ ~M je ,. 6J 61.~ @J .1 ~m ~ ~ III :;:~u~ i I ~i . II :dl~3 . ; il . I !ii~. ~ ~ II ~H i I" ; i-----jn i l'!i hPI I ~ ~ ~illll . · ~ .!i II .1 . ~ f---.-- __.---31 . ill I ..\ ! z ~ ~ ~nn~Li ... (j)$Jjr.00.0 lO3'OlId Irk ~ ~ ~ -ya \:;~\ ~'tA ~~ ~" I~ Z ih i~ a < ~ ;h .. ~'- ~; 11....0 )lI() ),8 UJ/ol/l. lI'1 B 8O/Kl/1O 11'.1. g IQ/lQ/tOlI'J. g ~ ~ III (t) (!) z (( z """ N z ~z ~O .1- U(!) - WZ (/):c u.(/) ~~ - - """>- ~~ W..J :r:~ I-W u.o Ow -u. :::t """ ~ Z ~NVri :JIDV3 mi~ ~n NOll''''''''' J.IfJI'IJIX)Alc)llJd~ J.IOI'Il'IIXIAlc) 1QdSM)lA\3ll ~.uc)IQdSNOl$WUlll .,n NYld DNIOV~ 1VnLd30NOO ),8 03t<<l1SJO ltaLNlX) 13316 1031'011d '~UI eJeqwloH 18 8Wl8g 011 'lN3rid013A30 ,.. ONV1 >I331:10 31DV3 ),8 Q3Wd3ijd ~ ~ il~ I i! g.. J~ ... ~'i i , i ~~, ~~ l~< ~ ~i! .:~ i~~,~ ~i i 5~~ ." .S" J~ RI'I~ ' i I! ! ~ ~ ~i l ~ii .~i~. . d' Iii i !i~ ~ d M~ lDuJ ii~ 1Il ~ i'~~ x~ ~ 1 I:~ ! , I:!! rfln. ~ 9 '. . . ,.! i ~ i!i~~ I ~ ~ ~ ill I ~ib ~ i i .~~~i~ i! i ~m~~ <lJ<liI<liI ~ ~ f', --~--~- I n~ I I -- -r---h----I-- i I:z: I I ~_!___J . i I ~ I I . .. ~ I l ~ t; I I I ~I'l ~~ I ~.~I !; I I n I Ii I 11;;1 n Ii ~ i I a I ~ I I ~~~~ -=.t:.-_-_- ~~~-=. ~------:::: ~f-= -. . ;!- .-;;; ~ l ~~~ . . .--Lii ~ ,_'N1.'S-3fiN3A'Ll.SLZ.-," _om --~-- e~l I I I I I !: ~ . ~~nnL~ [:fDGlJlreoffl_e I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WI' :r: . . I ~--+i u. I o I Z I o I i= I (( I o I a. I I I I ~i I o! I . ~.' I ! I I I i I i I t;i~' .. ~~ ~; 8 ~ ;~< ., !:l i'i ..."..!'P'VodBosp1lB'I III-WiI S~lBpOSSV 1fI ~UB'I. ~ ~ONYW ~1~~ i ............--- ..,.-~....."",-.., ,-_ --.. ...l....'__ '.'l~I~' I!! II!! ~Ilt a J ~ I ii .1-'1 lei /IClVI11Vl1 1%1'" -~ ~~ Ii rr c g,o u.! . ' i w C! _~ g .. ~~ oiC . ,... w '7 y.~ :rrJ (f) 0.. .:-. '_'_ .::-'._~_.~ 0_ ._ 0= .=-==_~_ -===-.~ .M .S~3-O--N-~ \i ._~S.LZ ,- ~-I'-'- ! M.Of', moos -r 7 b . "' I , I (,':;;-- I ~:~ \ -' ';;. :"',~' ''-,- "I ;L9'6CC M.Of',IO.OOS / ) 7 :( ~ :; .~ w U~I') .JI-() ,9U.z6 :( ~ ~0 u:Zi~ ~~Vl ~N<( Lz .~ ) ~r: WI-<( ~v~ :(u.N..J '00~ ...lzww LOVlO i=u.~ 0::0 _0 (Lv r:: "" :( : 7' Vl ";.... .00. 60. DOS I " '" 0". ~-;i8litt3~ O.......Ol-Zl-W O.......I-UJ(/l I = z z ,..~ 1-0.:1-<{-0> I-a.:owz " ~ >- o~o<~....... w~w<Cizg w~z~Q ; ~ ~t. :~~~:B lit-~o~.llIc( ~.....~o~ '" '" ,.." 1-0 =.OJ:ln. ,001-3 0 '" ,..'!i ~~5~~~ 1-~:t3Nf3I-~ I-~o)-o "- ~ zo ~~~;~~~ ~~~&~ 0 0 ~~ 1-:::E()t...~18 '" ,.. ~ 0," ~~~~~~ li:Ct:1- 0 VI t....o:::o<(z "'" ~ '" z'" ~~:i ~g~ ~~z ~ ~ 0 ~<D ~ ~~5 ~ ~ '" VI ~ ~o~: ~ " * ~~z~ ei ~ 8 ~ lr '" 6 ~~ Yo I 0 Z Qt ~ ~ '" <D ~ '" ~ Eli ~. !Ii o ' ~ ~I ,..". '" Ii "'~ ,.. ~t- I-Q:' ,-0 ~~ -," o~ z> - ~o 13" ~~ Vi~ zO:: z~ Qw Ow VIm zo:: ,..~ ~~ ,,~ Z'o *~ z~ 0," z'" .A ~.---4-- I" .!!I 1- ~ i I~ ~ ui d ~litlH lilt'! ~ inn i.U 1111 ~ ~\h~i h~ ~~h ~. .. <C <0 'l- ~ "- c::, c::, :0- o, ~ .. ~ s: z o ~ E-4 Z ..'~'. k- ~ ~ (9 ------1 , r I , , , , I ../\ I.-,~. .., , i ,~ : ~ I I \.....I) . lU. 1 II E~ C1.I;I. ._._-_._..~-+.-+_._~~ ---r-~. ~ ~ ! ! ! ~ITI I ~ , '" I ~ '-., _---J~ I ~ t ----- ------ ~ ~ i · i 1:;~~~~~~~~----------1 ~ ~ : ,---.,_______________ r 9> E!) I ~. ,l r-..: : 'flJ ~ I '" .... / 1 /' 1\ ~------------------- ~ ..0-. . 1"1 ..r:W -C) '~,' .-.- .?:~.:~-~~.- .-.= '===':--':- -===-. .'-M :S~3JlI\l~ 'rL ._~ S 12: .- ~;:'.;I'~'~ ~ ! . . M"Of:,lo.OOS /~ , 0 r U1 ~ u~ i~,l Uo 3"" :iI ,L9'6i?i? M"Of:,IO.OOS to ::> ~. '~ W LI~10 -.Jf-(') ) lL. Z6 :( ~ ~t; -.J .zz~ ~~(/) ~ N<( Z z~ ) ~r: Wf-<( ~'<t~ ( lL. N..J ou~ J zWW 0(/)0 i= lL. t: 0::0 o Q'<t " "- ( --, , , , I , , , Ikr I.... Ie> I , c::, L_____"_________________...J ~ 0> i ~ , , , , , , ". .W (/) > j J 3,,00,60.00S 1 QVIJ"'l w Z~I Z j1r.. :J o~~ ~ .""w ",,-, ~ ~z::> w ~~8 ~ 0 ~~g ~ ~ w ~~~ u ~ ~f5i 0 ~8~ ~ ~ 0 w w w w V> V> 0"':' ~~ wI: ~~ w ~~ S?~ "-~ ~~ V> Z o z 0"':' ~~ w,. ~~ ~z ~~ "-ll: ~~ V> z :I ~~ ~e m", wi ~< <-' M~ Ow Zr :Iv> . w OW _v> "I -;1 ~ s: ~ ~ H ~ ~'j' ~ r:......" ["'"""" ~ "lZJ ~ 1 1= e >- ~~ u -,< ~IO e~ "-< ,,-," o~ ~~ Uv> . I ~ ie ::l 151 5 ~;Wlli~ w .ul~ u - odoospur:[ S:;lrepOSSV 'll :;lUll'l JV1d ,QfVNIWI1:Jtld ClONVW J1?1J l~ .~ I: , . w '" 1W1d ~Mhi:l1W1 V> 1lz15 ~ ~L<Je f=~>- ~~~mi ~o~ ~~s~:5 ~ffi5 ~~~~B~~~~ LiJ8f.:)~~~~~>- ~~~:~-~~~~~ l&J~5ew~..J~=iei ~u.Q.L.JO~~lI:ffi~ c::wc.:lwc{l- 0< <2~lilo:tX~-~g~tri ~ I ~ I~ :! l'll 5 w -0 i1 !~ 1 ' 0:::: o z <r: 2 W w~n --1 f- l'l C) u..z6 <r: 0.0::0 w .z 25 I ~ ~(/) I, ~ N<( LL Z .~ o ~~ Wf-<( f-~V>= N..J <r:~ .<( Uo:: --1Zww 0..-0(/)0 F u..~ 0::0 >--~V 0::::: "- <r: : z (I) 2 ~ w ., I I I l15:r-f~~~--'--';'-------------_':_---------7 I-Pn . / :::; ~ --, s o Ui Z DJ IP: ~z I ,;.---.-- ....- / / .. r ~ ~ ~ I III I w ~ t ~ ~ . '" h Ii! t . ~ 1 I , .r-l : .!I I - L---1-.-- .-ill--! ~U J It..... ~i 11 I::> ~ ~I )} ~ If Il ~ ;;:ha~Ul J ,I ~I : I L-,~ ii ~t \ \ : l : I I -~~i----: ~ --~----~" -~~ s: ~ ~ U en Q j e <( w :5: Q.. <( .-J 01- <( U'Ju 0::: 0<( W Zo::: 0 <(I- W .-J It..J LL H- Z>- z<.> ~tj W~ ~I!' o.r " V> ~ ~ WV> ~~ ~ z 0 ~ <.> W ~ W <I> I- .l, U " z :0 z r ~ f! V> ~ ~ " --- ...~, u ~i~'tU: ~uhd salBpossy ~ amq ~ocI8oSJHI8'I SalBposSY ~ amq ~ 0 ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ E ~ i 0 ~ ffi~ ~~ 1:! ~ i~ ~ .,'~. ~ ~!~ I~;i ~ ~i ~ ~,: U i ~ ..,.. i& . i: I! zl!) as...i!; .t.... . I!' ~E i o~ m o-,~~ -affi-< ~ ~~ 0 ~l!i <:: t>~ ~ N ~ ! i ~~ hh~ ~ I~ I ~i dJ ~ i ~ ~ o~ ~~ !~ ttl ~: ~;l i . ~ ~ il g . ',iH 3W, I "'nl\~J\^1 'l'lV> ,..., J.:;J:H; 1IVJ;ICl .l~ 1\~ fi ~ -' <C f- W 0 0 z i2 <( -' ~ f- <C w (/) > f- a 0 w uo:! z 0 0<( <( CJ Z 1-. 05 zw 6~~ z. ;::~ 0 ~ V> ;::~ z~ ! CJ0a ~i :5i z~ ~ OUo -' Il. Z<(Z Il. CD <(Il. w ::> (/) CD W ~ ::> 0: I f- (/) ~~ ~ I (/) :~~ (/) ::> a ~ ~. w S15~ '= Z a u ~~~ !i~! ~ ~dl ~ -<( f- (/) 0'8 0~ Zo ;::~ z~ <( -' Il. W W ~ f- f- W W ~ f- (/) JV1d AtlVNIWI1;;jtjd dlONVW 81W8 J.:;J:H; 1IVJ;ICl --' <C f- W o z a ;:: u w f- a ~ Ct: ~ Q ~ T.lJ . -~------ w ~ ~ 0 f- z ~ ~~ ~: ~~i~~lI~o~" ~,~ ~ i~~ 'f ~~~~ U~ .~~~ ~~ ~ ~f ~ .~~ i~il.~ i~ ~~~ ,~ 10 ~~ ~ o~ V8li ~ .~A . ~~~ ~ loll t; ill.. aUl2 r.! Iii c m! ~ - ~H ~I ~1ig il ~~ ~ ~~~ i" ~. ~~;/ ~ ~Ii-~' ~,,~ ffi a ~ 'Ie .~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ 3~ ;: P: ~ ~ ~~ ~g ~~ 6 sQ. g 13 !:~ ~ . :::i~ ...::s ~~:;rQ. . ~ ~~: ,~~ ;~~ ~ ~g~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ m ~ _uu . ~f~ ~ ~ ~~Ei~ : I~ ~ I~ Ii; ~ I.i, ~ ~ ~~~~ d ~9 ~ 0 oS. F. N~. ~. ~iog Hi,i ~i ~~~H I!i~ . ~ ! ;~I~ ~ ~s~ ~~ ~g~i:~~ig i i i ~o ~~ ~i ~ ~~ ~ffi~~' 8~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ aM ~i ~~8~ ai. ~ t~~_~~_tLt_ ~i~~ ---~---~p .'~'"/i~-~ ~O~F ' ~ 0 ~~i.~ (/) I'~ i~ ~ ' ~ a~ f~ ; ~ i i;<~ + 5i~: i~ I @. .~ . ~ " "'~~~ 11 ~ ~ ~11 - ~~ i ~ ~ ~~~~ Z Il!~ ~ ~ ~~ f~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ '~iu ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ .;/~< ~ ~ ~o. --~'" ilL~~_~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ;/ ~'i~ <(~i i>iJ~ i~~ l~e e .~~ ~. .... .~ luh If I il:i ;; i ~; ~ :s ~~8.~ 85 ~ ~u~~ ~~ ~ -.....1") .<i-..n q;i-,..; -Iii O;:-e::: ~ ~r ~.!~ ~ ~~ f .hl ~ g . ~~~ ~Iil d.. ~~S~ ~:~i ~ i83~ ~ ~gn o Z :,: <( f-o (/)I! 0<1; 0~ z ;:: z <( -' Il. W W ~ f- ~ i '.l.H33~Z l ~ ~ en ~ ~ o J' N ; ~-~ . . -~ .~~ " .~: I'l! \: 'N, <. . ! -~ .~~ g i A ~ ~ ( i In~ ~ ~I 8 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 2,2008 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2008 Asphalt Overlay Project - Final Acceptance POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council accept the 2008 Asphalt Overlay Project constructed by Tucci and Sons, Inc, as complete? COMMITTEE: Land UselTransportation MEETING DATE: August 4, 2008 CATEGORY: [8] Consent D City Council Business D Ordinance D Resolution D D Public Hearing Other ~!~!.:!m~.:I.'g~:r BY..='mM~i!!l~~!.!g_~?I.:'.:.!;:?~~!~~KQ~_~!y_p.~!?..!.!.~m~9.!.~s Directo~ r.>..J.!:!'.!:._J.:'..l:1!>lic W:9.!.!<:~_.__.__._._m_._..m_m Attachments: LUTC memo dated August 4, 2008 Options Considered: 1. Authorize final acceptance of the 2008 Asphalt Overlay Project constructed by Tucci and Sons, Inc., in the amount of$I,907,790.93 as complete. 2. Do not authorize final acceptance of the completed 2008 Asphalt Overlay Project constructed by Tucci and Sons, Inc. as complete and provide direction to staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staffre mends Option l. DIRECTOR ApPROVAL: ~ Committee COIlllcil CITY MANAGER ApPROVAL: COIlllcil COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward Option 1 on the September 2, 2008 Council Consent Agenda for approval. Linda Kochmar, Chair Jim Ferrell, Member Dini Duclos, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "1 move approval of final acceptance of the 2008 Asphalt Overlay Project constructed by Tucci and Sons, lnc" in the amount of$1,907, 790.93 as complete." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: o APPROVED o DENIED o TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION o MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED - 02/06/2006 COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: August 4, 2008 Land Use and Transportation Committee Cary M. Roe, P.E., Assistant City Manager, Chie(Operati9ns Officer, Emergency Manager Marwan Salloum, P.E., Street Systems Manager~ John Mulkey, P.E., Street Systems Project Engineer 2008 Asphalt Overlay Project - Project Acceptance and Retainage Release BACKGROUND: Prior to release of retainage on a Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and State Department of Labor and Industries requirements. The above-referenced contract with Tucci and Sons, Inc. is complete. The final construction contract amount is $1,907,790.93. This is $363,474.22 below the $2,271,265.15 (including contingency) budget that was approved by the City Council on March 4, 2008. cc; Project File Central File K:\LUTC\2008\08-04-08 2008 Asphalt Overlay project - Project AcceptlUlce.doc _~~~~.~!~_~~_~.!~~_~~.!E,:~:p',!.~mber~-,__~~.~~__"__,,m_.___'____._._''___'''____].!E~_~.:..___.__._._m'_m'_____ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Status Update - 2008 Planning Commission and Long Range Planning Work Program POLICY QUESTION: This presentation is for information purposes only COMMITTEE: LUTC MEETING DATE: August 4,2008 CATEGORY: D Consent D Ordinance D Public Hearing D City Council Business D Resolution [gI Other: Information Only .~!~~!~,~Q,~! BY~eni()r PJ,~J..1:er ~_l:l!gl:l!~!._g!ark,_~lCP "_,,_"'__,,__,m,,m_,__m_~EP~.:.....~~m~_~ni~,_De~elop~en~,__ BACKGROUND: This is an update to the Land Use Transportation Committee (LUTC) on the status of the 2008 ,,~I8:~~i.~~_~~~~i~sion Wo!.k ~~~~~,:,,'________"m._._.__.,,_,___,_._____,,____""_____._m__'____ . ",,_,__, ATTACHMENTS: July 29, 2008, Staff Report with Exhibits A-C OPTIONS CONSIDERED: This presentation is for information purposes only. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: NtA CITY MANAGER ApPROVAL: to Council DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ~ to Committee To Council COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Nt A Jim Ferrell, Member Linda Kochmar, Chair Dini Duclos, Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: N/A THIS ITEM IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: o APPROVED o DENIED o T ABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION o MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED - 02/06/2006 COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # \\cfwfile\users\CD\MargareC\2008 Planning Commission Work Program\080408 Agenda BilL doc ~ CITY OF .".....~~ Federal Way CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT July 29, 2008 Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe) Cary Roe, Assistant City Manager (!/lIYt\... Greg Fewins, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner Status Update - 2008 Planning Commission and Long Range Planning Work Program MEETING DATE: August 4, 2008 DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: I. BACKGROUND At the beginning of each calendar year, the Planning Commission's Work Program for that year is approved by the City Council. The Planning Commission Work Program consists of both zoning code amendments (modifying existing codes or adopting new ones) and amending the comprehensive plan. The City Council adopted the 2008 Planning Commission Work Program on January 15,2008. At that time the Work Program consisted of the following. A. ITEMS STARTED IN 2007 AND CARRIED OVER INTO 2008 1. Significant Trees, Vegetation Retention, Clearing, and Grading - This involves a review of and amendment to the current City of Federal Way zoning and subdivision code requirements related to the preservation of significant trees, vegetation retention, and site grading. 2, South 35(/h Subarea Plan - This is a study to determine whether the Single-Family Residential (RS) 15,0 designated parcels located south of SW 356th Street and west of 151 Avenue South should be considered for higher density, B. NEW ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS 1. Increase the building height in all commercial zones. 2. Delete the 120-foot maximum fa~ade length requirement of the Community Design Guidelines. As buildings become taller, there is a need for them to be longer and wider in order to retain appropriate bulk and scale. 3. Reduce how open space requirements are met in the City Center-Core (CC-C) and City Center-Frame (CC-F) zones. The present open space requirement for residential development precludes efficient use of a site. This has become evident with the recent Symphony development. 4. Delete the maximum allowable density for senior housing in the Community Business (BC) zone. There is no maximum density requirement in other commercial zones (CC-C and CC- F) which allow senior housing. In addition, other development standards, such as maximum height, required parking, landscaping, and water detention requirements are sufficient to cap density, 5. Amend Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," and Chapter 22, "Zoning," to incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, The City has recently received technical assistance from the Puget Sound Partnership, which will be in the form of reviewing our codes and proposing code amendments to implement LID techniques. 6. Allow home occupation day cares in an existing nonconforming residential dwelling in commercial zones. This amendment is required to comply with state law. Also, re-examine the home occupation provisions for clarity and applicability in more unique situations, such as adult family homes. 7. Allow the Director of Community Development Services the flexibility to determine the allowable hours of construction on a case-by-case basis. Presently, work is not allowed under any circumstance before 9:00 a,rn, and after 8:00 p.rn, on Sundays and holidays. However, there is sometimes a reason to grant permission to work at these times; for example, the Department of Transportation may need to engage in construction around the clock, 8. Adopt regulations allowing storage containers (cargo containers) in non-residential and/or residential zones. The code is silent on allowing this use and there has been inquires about the use of containers, more commonly on commercial property and to a lesser extent on residential property. 9, Allow churches in all zones. Currently, churches are allowed in all residential zones and the BC, CC-C, and CC-F zones, but not in the Neighborhood Business (BN), Professional Office (PO), Commercial Enterprise (CE), or Office Park (OP) zones. 10. Allow off site signs, such as banners and kiosks, in order to better publicize major events in our city, such as the Federal Way Symphony concerts; Festival Days events; Red, White, and Blue Festival; Centerstage plays; Han Woo Ri; etc. 11. Remove the notice requirements for Social Service Transitional Housing. Presently this use is subject to a Process III review, which requires pubic notice in the paper; posting the site and public notice boards (City Hall and public libraries); and notifying all property owners within 300 feet ofthe site. C. 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS The Planning Commission also holds the public hearing on the annual comprehensive plan amendments, The following is a list of citizen-initiated comprehensive plan amendment requests which were selected for further study at a March 4, 2008, City Council meeting: Land UseITransportation Committee (LUTC) Staff Report Status Update - 2008 Planning Commission and Long Range Planning Work Program Meeting Date: August 4, 2008 Page 2 1. Request from Mr. Un-Ha Shin to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of two parcels totaling 5.01 acres located east of Pacific Highway South at approximately the 27700 block and directly east of the Silver Shadow apartment complex, from Single Family High Density and RS 7.2 (one unit per 7,200 square feet) to Multi-Family and Multifamily Residential (RM 2400 - one unit per 2,400 square feet). 2. Request from Federal Way Village LLC (developer of the Federal Way Village project at Kitts Corner) to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 1.53 acres located at 33901 Pacific Highway South, from Multi-Family and Multifamily Residential (RM 2400- one unit per 2,400 square feet) to Community Business and BC zoning. 3. Request from Ms. Trinh Nguyen to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of two lots totaling 0.3 acres located at the southwest corner of the intersection of South 288th Street and 18th Avenue South, from Multi-Family and Multifamily Residential (RM 3600 - one unit per 3,600 square feet) to Community Business and BC zoning. There are also housekeeping amendments that will be made to chapters of the comprehensive plan. In addition, we have recently been notified by the City of Des Moines (Exhibit A) that the City of Federal Way is required to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of property located east of 15th Avenue South (Exhibit B) per a settlement agreement between Granville Southern Corporation, Donald and Marie Tavis, and the Cities of Des Moines and Federal Way entered into in August 2000. II. STATUS OF THE WORK PROGRAM After beginning work on the code amendments, it appeared to be more efficient to combine certain of them. In addition, work items not previously approved as part of the Planning Commission Work Program have arisen. The following table describes how items are proposed to be combined and it also lists the new work items. The attached Excel Chart (Exhibit C) also lists these items with tentative public hearing and meeting dates. Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe) Staff Report Status Update - 2008 Planning Commission and Long Range Planning Work Program Meeting Date: August 4, 2008 Page 3 rn = .... ~ .... IJJ .... 01) <1).5 -e ta EX c..(,) <1)._ 00- .....g <8p.. '"d C <I) 0 ;; ~r;; '"tj .~ -5 ~ 00 0 uiU ~ 01) (,).5 8 8 c..<<I c- -p.. C'. - ~ = '5'J> .... le. o Sl Q c: '0 <l,) -= :a Q ~ o Z Sl f ~ e ~ .::.: le. Q ~ - ~ = .... Cf) 'C o eo-. Q t: ~ ~ '" <I) >- Sl ~ - '" .... <I) .5 <<I 1:: o U o 01) ta U .... 01) <I) .5 .D ta 8 <I) EX c..(,) <I) ,_ 00- .....g <8p.. '"d C <I) 0 "3"r;; "'0 .~ -5 ~ 00 0 uiU ~ 01) (,).5 8 8 c..<<I c- -p.. ~ z <I) <I) <I)~<9 <9~'o ;>'.D. ~= "= '"d'- 0 ta ~'';::: <I).".::: t! .c <I) 0 .8g~ ~'c;; fa ::I C .... 8 ,g t" C .::!3 ~ -- Cd ..= "- M c. . ~ t ~ ; 0 c.. '<;i ~ U ~ C ~ OI)U ~ ~ '~'o ~ o.s~~ z p.. c.. (,) 1a li: C .g - (,) ::I '"d ~ c.. .C E- <I) - ::I ~ o U 01) .5 .... ta <I) <I) "8 X - (,) (,) 0:':::: .....g <8p.. '"d d <I) 0 :;";; "'0 .~ -5 ~ 00 0 uiU ~ 01) (,) .5 ~~ d- -p.. := <I) d (,) ::I d S .5 li: 01::<<1 U 0 <I) <1)(,)< <9.9. . ... .D 00 0 ::I o coo o d-B NOlO \0" .;; lr) ,_ ("f') ~~~ ::;E'"dCl) <I) d <9 <I) 0<1)<9 ~-g:€ >- 8 ~ '" <I) >- <I) ~ '"d :3- 1a li: <I) .~ '" C <I) .c <I) .... c.. 8 o U 00 o o N 01) .5 .... ta <I) <I) "8 X ... (,) (,) 0:':::: .....g <8p.. '"d C <I) 0 ::i"C;; "'0 .~ -5 ~ 00 0 uiU ~ 01) (,).5 o 5 at<! c- -p.. <I) N .- """ .ell;::: <I) <I) C <I) ~ gj <I) C . <<I a <I) H\(,)-6.D ""'j <I) C '"d ~,.cQ,)_ ......O\F;::I o (;j 0 ..;8<1)~ '"d .~ "i5....o- 1a S <I) N 1,,,, g. 1:: '" <I) '"d <I) 8"g t.:; 8 E.5 ~.- go "'":.D"=t'5a:i '" 8 '"d'- > ~81a~~ '" <I) >- -CDS 0,,) Q,) $ --'"_ tn ta -g .~ ~ ~ g '" g-<I)~ ~CI)~ ~~ ..8'"d_ (,) ~ ::::: d <<I So..... d ,- .ccua.Q~ U.::l C 3'- <I) e ~ .~,s,~ ~ <I) ...,.. <I) >< '"i' 0 .c ,.,:; 8 <<I .- U ~E<I)::;E~ '" ..2 .!:l <I) ...,.. .5 <1)<1)::1-"':;'" d ,.... 0'..2 .... <I) O~<I)<I)O'" N~.~O""'::> "2 <I).c..Oc d ~ bb ~'[jj ~ ~~ ~ s ~ :B i:.Ll<.....:lNOU .... gp 01) <I) ,_ t ,5 -e~ -e~ ~X 8X o (,) <I) (,) z:.:::: 0:':::: .....g .....g <8 p.. <8 p.. '"d C '"d C C1.) 0 ~.9 "3"Cii ;:s r.n '"O.~ "'O.:!J -5~ -5~ 00 0 00 0 uiU uiU ~ 01) ~ 01) (,).5 (,).5 8 5 8 8 c.. t<! c.. <<I ~ s:: ~ ii: o Z '" <I) >- d:d c .g - c E ~ <I) e E- ~ c :a <<I .... "'1:: d:d <I) 01)8 c <I) 'C ~ ]fr U~ ~ '" d <I) o ~ 0 - <<I ... "g c.. '" 8 1> t;:l'"d g.g 01)[ :a 1a ~ c .5 8 0<1) <l)C- 8~::a~~~ ~ ~.5 ~ "2 p.. <I) dS.D d'"d .D<I)d>'d<l) '" c.. <I) (,) 0 '" <I) ~ 0 8 d .- 0 (,) '" <I) E.23 go 1a ,:::: ~.!:l.23.~ .... 5 '.a ::I '" '"d c... ~'"d g's.g~'E >-<<1....(,)"'_0 '"d 1a <I) <I) <I) '"d~ <I) <9 .5 '" 01:: - <I) '"d 8 E <I) .- .!:l ]g. .Q e . - <I) '" <<I (,) <I) .5 <<I d 0I)c..0 -_ VJ N .... d ~ 0<1), ~ c..u ~ou '" 01) '"d :E'~ 1a E-~u <Ii.a · <I) '"d U >-dU - ~ C S- o- .~~ .~ ta "gp.. 0.9 ~'"d taE p..~ '"d~ 1a '" 8 1:: <<I <I) ~.g d ~ 8. 8 ~ o<~ '"d <I) ~ 1;; - o Z <I) > <<I .c - - ~ .....; '"d 1a 10 a:i"g .....; .5 "'.D 8 8 ~ 8 <Ii ~ ~.8 '" <I) >- <<i C ~.g "s "fii <<I 1a ~ .... _E- "3 <I) '"d (,) <.- . t '" <I) COO 0_ .- <<I ~ "- c..(,) ::I 0 (,)00 o d:d 01) <I) ~.5 5 5 gj 000 XXX 00 <1)0 <9~ .c - - .- ,- .... ~ c.. '"d< a:i .5 .c C '" 0 <<I ._ ~ ~ C .- .~ ~ '" 0 ~U 01) -6.5 ~ ~ <li: o Z '" <I) >- .5 i .~ X '" 01)<1) .5 S :s!N 'S ca ~ '13 <I) t ~ ~ (,) 0 ..su 00 -.to g~ ('.I <<I "=t.~ .... '" 5h ~ o <<I Cl bIl = .~ <I) ~ ~ ~ o ... ~ ~ ~ bIl = '~ 15:: <I) bIl t ~ o~ frbll ~ = ~~ CF:J ~ u= f-o .9 ;::::l '" ~ ,~ ~~ ~ 0 .- u ~ .gf o .- U ~ =- ,9 ~ <<100 to 00 0..('.1 '" I ~ <I) "'<<1 C;"c::l <I) 0.. "';::::l ;::::l '" ]E ~CF:J rIl = - = - rJl '" ~ "0 aJ :g aJ = .d 0 0._ '" '" ~.~ g~ ~ t 0 >u ~ eJ} O.S ~~ ~ "'- aJ~ o 1-0 8..s 0._ = aJ ......>-. c-. - = = .... ~ 'C o El = c=: "CI ~ '== :a = :?J o Z e f ~ e ~ ~ = ~ - = = .... ~ 'C o eo.. = 1:: = ~ '" aJ >< El ~ - ,..... '" 1-0 ;::3 o ::t = .9 - o g '" = o U "0 aJ 'g - '" - o Z o Z '" aJ >< ~ <Ii' 1-0 (I) ~ co <Ii' 6h en (I) - en ~ o ~12 o '" _ 0 :(:2 E ] t+::_ g eJ) 0 0. .5 Z ~ .:: on 01) en ;::3 = .5 .- sa'p ~ 1:) 0.- Q) U ~ - '0'0- ~aJ~ao co"Ol-o 0 ::t8..s~N ~ __0 ......"0(1)"'- .d = >-. ~ .5 .t:: ~ ~ = t ~ -5 "0.9 > eJ}!aaJ~o 5 (I) -.- S ~~]~~ ~S~8B o Z '" (I) >< = (I) S 0. o Q) > (I) Q - o ~ S' ...... ~ o ~ eJ} .S ~ E::: 1-0 ..s ~ '" ~ "0 (I) = :g .9 Q) .fa ~ ~ o 0 zu ~ Z (I) (I) (I)@;S ;Sg~ >-..o~ "D = "'= "0'- 0 !a ~'';: (I).t:: {g .d (I) 0 (I) 0 0. .0 5 '" ~'", a ;::3=~ S.9 ~ = tI'} tI].... ~ :E .~ ~~ "a - S 1-0 (I) ~ S (I) > ~ 0 a"t;; ~ u ~ ~ ~eJ}U.d .$.5 <+-< e ..... 5 0 0. '!a'gS ~ E::: 0. 8 (I) aJ ~ - g S' ...... o f:E ~ ~ '" ~ "0 (I) :g (I) = .d 0 0,_ '" '" .... .5!3 g~ ~ t 0 >u ~ eJ} o ,5 ~~ 2 '" ~ "'- (I)~ o 1-0 8..s 0._ = (I) ......>-. ~ z "0 a 1:) ~ (I) (I) '0'.0 ....+-~ 0.00 eJ}=~ .5] aJ 0.d;S eJ}",_ 6 ~ '" 0~;S"O a-€J(I)~ = =.5 8 (I) (I) - 0. (I) S (I) 0. .o~;S: ~ <+-< - ~ ..co~~ ",(1)"0 :E g.~ ~ ~ ~'~ 6b o (I) (I) 0 Z;S:9a = o .~ N '~ eJ} 1-0 o ~ (I) "0 o U 00 .,., o 0 ~~ ~~ tl 5h ~ o 1;j Cl bI) oS o o ::E .g ~ ::> ....l <I> -5 .9 t ::> ~ en Q() o """ o Q() o ij ~ e ~ ~ ~ = .S '" .~ o U 00 = 'c a l5: Q() o o ~ U ~ 00 t<l ~ Y ~ <I> '" i <> ::::: ~ !;O o ... ~ ~ o ::: bI) = '2 a s: o bI) "g~ o.bI) ~ = !;:3 5"'0 rfJ a u= S .~ ~ .- ';;'~ ~ 0 ,- u ~ gp 0'- u = = a ,5:: s: ~~ 00 o.N '" I a 0 ... 1;j ~"'O o 0. "'~ ~ '" ]E ~rfJ r/J.. /J /IX ~~ - Ocg" - 103 ~(o 3 -./ Ai) Ww, 0/ fil\ "J~ .. . I (D~ ';2). v,.~ RECEIVED BY ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE~ FiTMENT PLANNING, BUILDING AND PUBLIC WORKS r www.desmoineswa.gov 21630 11TH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE D DES MOINES, WASHINGTON 98198-6398 (206) 870-7576 FAX (206) 870-6544 July 1, 2008 Greg Fewins Director, Community Development Services City of Federal Way PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Re: Pacific Heights (Granville Southern) Dear~ As you may recall, on August 13, 1998 the Boundary Review Board (BRB) issued a decision approving the annexation of Redondo Riviera into the City of Des Moines, Subsequently, an appeal of the BRB' s annexation decision was filed by Granville Southern with the King County Superior Court under Cause Number 98-2-19694-KNT. In order to settle the litigation, The Cities of Des Moines and Federal Way, along with Granville Southern entered into a settlement agreement. The project remained dormant until 2006 when the City of Des Moines was contacted by the new owners of the property and project, Pacific West LLC, to discuss the steps needed to complete the Pacific Place project, which was later renamed Pacific Heights. In March of 2008, the Des Moines . City Council approved the preliminary plat for Pacific Heights, However, approval of the preliminary plat did not fulfill all of the terms of the settlement agreement between the Cities of Des Moines and Federal Way and Granville Southern, As part of the agreement the Cities agreed to change the zoning classification of the property to RA-360Q pursuant to Item 1. The City of Des Moines conducted the required public hearing for the zone recHissification for. the portion of the site within Des Moines on June 26, 2008 and the City Council approved Ordinance Number 1431 (enclosed) amending the official zoning map changing the zoning classification from RS-7200 to RA-3600 for that portion of the Granville site within the City of Des Moines. The zoning classification for the portion of the site within City of Federal Way must also be changed in accordance with the settlement agreement. During the public hearing for the zoning reclassification, the Des Moines City Council asked staff to confirm that Federal Way is also proceeding with the required zoning reclassification. Please provide the approximate date by which the zoning reclassification will be presented to the Federal Way City Council so we can keep our City Council informed. This correspondence can be sent to the stafflead for the project: Jason Sullivan, If you would like to setup a meeting to discuss this term of the settlement agreement, please contact Jason Sullivan by phone at (206) 870-6551 or by email at isullivan@desmoineswa.gov, fT/w O)IJ~ riay * Printed on Recycled Paper EXHIBIT -A-- PAGE-LOF -L- Sincerely, ~~JX) Grant Fredricks Planning, Building, and Public Works Director Enclosure CC: Tony Piasecki - City Manager Pat Bosmans - City Attorney Robert Ruth - Development Services Manager Jason Sullivan - Land Use Planner II EXHIBIT -A-- PAGE-LOF -L- EXHIBIT B PACIFIC HEIGHTS PLAT - ... -- - ..J...l.. -......... ---,,- M ::_- =1 '"'iiT" I." _ ta.... ~ It _ ~. REDOtlDO otlTHE HIGHWAY -=- . ~ RM18DD ~ ,. .r,.......' ...., " " ",r, ~i UJ: c . 1 9 , . , ~.. -- ..... -~ - =-- - ..... - - .. CIl ~ "'=" ~ il ==- ~ -- ... , i =::fl .....1 - - " ~ ,,~ l ,~RM18DO !T f -=- ;"t::- ~ ',-.' ~RM1800 ~~ ~ , +.::-; .... ...... - 3 -=- ~'..~ - i H'" ~ RM18DO ==- .-( "'=" > / ~.. q~' Cross Hatched Area is presently zoned RS 7.2 (Single family, one unit per 7,200 sq. ft.). Per the Settlement Agreement, this would need to be rezoned to accommodate zero-lot line townhouses, w z ::ic. Q) wen :& j::: U) I- z7ij W ~ :& ::::l C~ OZ .....w -:& m<e i:w )(C.?:- WO::::l 0' co Q Q N Q) ~ 5 <e' :& :& ~ U) U Q) Cl > o Z " e C\I Q) ~ i::ii g Q) 0.5 t1l.~ ..... ~ ,5 U U 0 Q)"E~ o o a:: 0 Q) . " e ~ .. ~ CleQ) 7ij ,5 t1l,~ ..... ~.5 U OQ)"E~ Oa::OQ) If .d lu~iu ~ ,., .11 . !I 'C:: a. ~ " Q) ::::l o !!l ~ a.. w en .;:: o ...J ~ Q) I: :a e o o o ~ III o Q) ,- U "CleQ) e .5 t1l .~ C\I ~ .5 U OQ)"E~ Oa::OQ) - o ..... o OCl . _ e 0'- I-~ 3~ II! " Q) ::::l o !!l ~ a.. w en .ll: U it: e III a:: e o :w U ::::l " Q) 0::: a. .;:: I- .2l ::::l E E o o .2l III " a. ::::) e III a:: ~ 'iij e Q) J: l!! a. E e o.!!l 00.. I.r hi D..()Q,. " Q) ::::l o !!l ~ a.. w en ~ Q) 'S: Q) a:: o a:: Cl .... l!! III ~ III :E o .2l _ 3l .!! III ..!. ::::) Q) 'u :: e CJ:...E::::lQ) u'SlQ) :EN CD"I:E:J"':W1ll ~;~ E.5.Eo ~ J:OCDO>C~...O ~ - 0 III ..,- 0 N ~-" :E'-'- 1Ilc(1Il1: ~e_ CD l!! :;r:;: .2l CD ~ .!!! SIIlLL;.!!C"l::! N III E E CD CD I: CD CD Cj5I1lE -g "fi ~ .~ in" !: ~ E 1Il....-:JCD~.-O a.::::l>Ca-eoEo >CJ: III CD 0= III I: wO:EO:::Nc(LL._ " e C\I Q) oai::iigQ) 7ij .5 t1l ,~ ..... ~.5 U OQ)"E~ Oa::OQ) ,iI '!~~ " Q) ::::l o !!l ~ a.. w en ! III ~ III :E olI! .... III ~ ~ III III ':E .... CD e ! CD I- E ~ CD g'~ .- Q. " CD I! 0::: C)olI olI I: ClO e:w .;:: e 1Il.2l .!! CD 00::: -.I il. " Q) ::::l o !!l ~ a.. w en " Q) ::::l o !!l ~ a.. w en Q) J: - -> 0" Q) ::::l Q)- =ene 'e ~.2 E 0 0 oJ:13 oS:en .... l!! III ~ III :E CD U CD .~ .f....CD .s....'3C1) I:U"- i!: CD !. c( .~ Cl III E E ..:- 0 I: 0.. " - c CI) 'iij " I: 1Il0....:J I: CD.ll::w.... 0 III E "'1Il III III :J: A' a. CD CD....D..::::lEiii ~s.s8os a.:w " 0 :J: .- Cl)lIlcn >:!:: I: U.;;;oCD:: III CD:C.!!lEEe Oa.CD CDO III I! CO::::J:LLI- I'~ .;:: o ...J olI .... l!! CD III > ~~ III :E olI .... =: l!! ~ III III III :E ~C III :E f .5 CD .s 2 J: III CI m 'i iii :J: III ~ I: Cl CD :J CI 1:1:,2Ci) :2.s~.2l 'S iii 0 .- lD .~ :g ~ CDCD::::lOJ :: E b III l!! E ~ ~ .2 uoo=llr:: .50 0 C(olI -I-- -I-- -I-- g' :w .;:: ~ CD " o U -g-I-- III J: l::! III CD III CD 0::: -I-- ~ - o CD 01 IV a. -I-- -I-- .... :: ! CD III I: ~ III III ':E .... l!! ~ III it: ~ III :E .... e CD E I: a. 0 ~ CD ~ > .f '2 8.... III .... ~ ~ ~ ~~ EuO::: - IE CD ~ lIS" o &;; 0 ...J I- 0