HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUTC MINS 02-05-2007G:\LUTC\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2007\02-05-07 LUTC Minutes.doc
City of Federal Way
City Council
Land Use/Transportation Committee
February 5, 2007 City Hall
5:30 pm City Council Chambers
MEETING MINUTES
In attendance: Committee Chair Jack Dovey and Committee Member Dean McColgan, Committee Member Eric Faison
was excused; Council Member Linda Kochmar and Council Member Jeanne Burbidge; City Manager Neal Beats; Public
Works Director Cary Roe; Public Works Deputy Director Ken Miller; Surface Water Manager Paul Bucich; Solid
Water/Recycling Coordinator Rob Van Orsow; Economic Development Director Patrick Doherty; Community
Development Director Kathy McClung; Senior Planner Margaret Clark; City Attorney Patricia Richardson;
Administrative Assistant II Tina Piety
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Dovey called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The January 22, 2007, minutes were approved.
Moved: McColgan Seconded: Dovey Passed: Unanimously
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
None
4. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. South 373rd Street Bridge Replacement and Stream Restoration Project – Bid Results & Request to Move
Forward with WSDOT
Paul Bucich provided the background information on this item. Council Member Kochmar asked why there
was a better bid. Mr. Bucich replied that he is not sure, but it is not a street project, which are more expensive.
Moved: McColgan Seconded: Dovey Passed: Unanimously
Committee PASSED Option 1 on to the February 20, 2007, City Council Consent Agenda for approval.
B. Regional Solid Waste Planning – Governance Issues
Ron Van Orsow provided the background information on this item. The report presents four primary issues and
recommendations to help guide regional solid waste planning and policy. One issue is to determine how best to
maintain an interlocal forum for providing policy input and ensuring city participation and input in the regional
solid waste system early in the planning stages. The report recommends replacing the existing Solid Waste
Interlocal Forum with the Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee (MSWMAC). A
second issue is that no formal method for resolving disputes between one or more cities and the county is
currently provided for. The report outlines several dispute resolution options. The third issue is that the 2001
Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan contains eight very broad financial policies. The report
recommends four areas where more focused financial policies need to be developed. The fourth issue
concerned the positive and negative impacts to cities that host transfer stations. The report recommends
continuing King County’s mitigation efforts at host city transfer stations, while developing mitigation policies,
and considering a host city fee. There was no discussion. Chairman Dovey is a member of the MSWMAC and
questions, comments, and recommendations may be sent to him and/or Mr. Van Orsow. Staff will continue to
provide updates on this issue.
Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 2 February 5, 2007
G:\LUTC\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2007\02-05-07 LUTC Minutes.doc
C. Amendment to the Sound Transit Agreement
Patrick Doherty provided the background information on this item. This issue had been tabled at the last LUTC
meeting (January 22, 2007). Ms. Faaluaina Pritchard, Executive Director of the Koran Women’s Association
(KWA), Ms. Shirley Bekins, Senior Housing Developer at Common Ground, and Mr. Roger Tucker, Architect
at Environmental Works, were on hand to give the Committee more information on the project as had been
requested. They provided the Committee with a handout and delivered a presentation. KWA is over three
decades old and is located in nine counties, with 600 employees. They have served Federal Way over 15 years
(serving over 2000 people a month) and are currently renting office space in Federal Way. This project would
give them owned office space, in addition to the planned senior citizen housing and child day care. The project
will be primarily funding by HUD. Funding is competitive and the grant may be applied for once a year. They
are seeking an amendment in order to provide ample time to obtain this grant. Ms. Pritchard commented that
Sound Transit had expressed concerns over the timeline and asked KWA to seek this amendment from the city.
They are currently in the feasibility stage and hope to have the funding by the end of this year. If the funding is
secured, they will start construction next summer.
Mr. Tucker commented that he sought review and input from Sound Transit and Patrick Doherty on the design.
Parking will be semi-underground and will provide parking for the offices, day care, and residents. The current
plan is four floors of senior housing with all except the manager’s being one bedroom.
Council Member McColgan stated if the timeline states the project will be completed in 2009, why are you
asking for two more years? Ms. Pritchard replied that because it is competitive, there is no guarantee they will
receive the grant and Sound Transit suggested they ask the city for the amendment. Given their reputation,
KWA thinks they will be given the grant. Council Member McColgan stated if KWA does not receive the
grant this year, how often will you reapply? Ms. Bekins replied that if they do not receive the grant, they can
obtain the score from HUD that will give them an idea of any problems with the application and if they can be
addressed. If they can address any problems, they will try a second time, but will not apply more than twice.
Council Member McColgan commented that if the grant is not received until 2008, there is still time to
compete the project under the current contract, so why amend it? Ms. Pritchard replied that Sound Transit
researched this issue and taking into account that KWA is a non-profit organization, they want to give KWA as
much time as possible to succeed. Council Member Kochmar asked wouldn’t waiting until next year give
KWA a better idea about whether you need an amendment or not. Ms. Pritchard commented that Sound Transit
is asking this of them.
Council Member Kochmar asked, are you saying Sound Transit is saying the city must accept the amendment
in order for Sound Transit to accept the project? What happens if the city does not approve the amendment?
Ms. Bekins replied that Sound Transit is concerned over the public funding nature of the project and the
timeline and they want to ensure KWA has sufficient time to obtain the funding. Chairman Dovey asked, are
you saying if the city doesn’t agree to the amendment, Sound Transit will not approve the project? Ms.
Pritchard replied that she does not know for sure. Ms. Bekins commented that they are still in negotiations with
Sound Transit; it is not a done deal. Chairman Dovey commented that the city needs to know what the real deal
is before making a decision. Council Member McColgan agrees. Ms. Pritchard commented that if the city
approves this amendment, it would show KWA that the city supports the organization and the project.
Chairman Dovey asked where the operating capital will come from. Ms. Pritchard replied that HUD will
supply operating capital for 40 years.
Council Member McColgan commented that tonight is the first time the city has heard that Sound Transit will
not approve the project if the amendment is not approved, and the city needs to know if this is true or not
before we can make a decision. Chairman Dovey commented that the decision on the amendment does not
have anything to do with the city’s support or lack of support for KWA. This is a contractual decision that goes
back to before the KWA project and the decision should not be based on emotions. Council Member
McColgan commented that he does not feel the extra time is needed, but if Sound Transit has made approval of
the amendment a condition of accepting the project, he needs to know if this is true before making a decision
on the amendment. The Committee asked staff to ask Sound Transit if approval of the amendment is a
contingency for approval of the project. It was decided to table this discussion to a future LUTC meeting, to be
announced.
Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 3 February 5, 2007
G:\LUTC\LUTC Agendas and Summaries 2007\02-05-07 LUTC Minutes.doc
D. Planning Commission Work Program
Kathy McClung provided the background information on this item. She provided the Committee with a revised
staff report. Some items were added to the revised report. She suggested that staff return with a prioritized list
and the Committee agreed. She informed the Committee that a number of the projects on the current Work
Plan will be going to the Planning Commission in March. She also informed the Committee that the city has
received three proposals for cottage housing and preliminary public meetings have been held on all three. The
next step is for the applicants to revise their proposals based on comments at these meetings.
Norma L. Blanchard, 31039 7th Avenue SW – She commented that the junk cars ordinance is well
written and works, but other regulations about junk should be rewritten, specifically concerning
visual blight. The regulation should be stronger and people should be fined if they do not clean up
their visual blight. She is also concerned with blackberry and ivy bushes that encroach from
neighboring residents. She also gave the Committee a hard copy of her comments.
Council Member McColgan agreed there are grey areas in the code related to junk that should be tightened up
and asked how this issue would fit in the work plan. Chairman Dovey also agrees. This is a quality of life issue
that should be addressed. He commented that not everyone defines junk the same way. He suggested the city
research Tacoma’s program.
Council Member McColgan suggested that increasing the height of buildings in the Neighborhood Business
zone be added to the work plan. Chairman Dovey would add increasing the height in the City Center beyond
200 feet. Ms. McClung responded that she will return with what is reasonable for the department to accomplish.
Chairman Dovey asked about the staffing for the department. Ms. McClung replied that staffing is a concern.
The city has 1½ employees for long range planning.
Council Member Burbidge asked if the retention of vegetation will include permanent and replacement trees.
Ms. McClung replied that it will address all aspects. Council Member Burbidge expressed concern about the
effect on surface water management by the lot coverage in residential zones of non-permeable surfaces such as
sports courts, large homes, and garages. Is this issue addressed in the code? Ms. McClung replied that she will
add this issue to the list.
5. FUTURE MEETING
The next meeting will be announced.
6. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 6:51 p.m.