HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland ReportHABITAT TECHNOLOGIES
July 16, 2018
Mr. Robert Hansen, Planning Manager
@ City of Federal Way
33325-8 th Avenue South
Federal Way, Washington 98003
Ms. Becky Chapin, Associated Planner
@ City of Federal Way
33325 — 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, Washington 98003
e-mail Becky.Chapin@cityoffederalway.com
RE: Review of Wetland Z Adjacent to Parcel 1721049034
I would first like to thank you both for meeting with me to discuss the potential
implementation of Wetland Z and its associated buffer (as depicted in the prior
delineation for the Celebration Park Area) in relation to the future planning for Parcel
1721049034. As noted for the prior Celebration Park Area, Wetland Z was confined
within a narrow ravine and dominated by a forest plant community. As such, Wetland Z
was defined in 1997 as a City of Federal Way Category II Wetland with a standard
buffer of 100 feet in width. Wetland Z was also defined as not exhibiting any high value
ratings for any functions.
As we discussed, and as depicted within the mapping prepared for the Celebration Park
Area, the prior standard 100 -foot buffer for Wetland Z extended approximately 30 to 40
feet onto the very western boundary of Parcel 1721049034. In addition, the
compensatory mitigation completed along Wetland Z also pushed the standard buffer
even further onto the western boundary of Parcel 1721049034.
Following our discussion Habitat Technologies completed an onsite assessment and
subsequent categorization of Wetland Z pursuant to the Washington State Wetland
Rating System for Western Washington (Hruby, 2014). Wetland Z was identified as
confined within an existing ravine that appeared to have not changed significantly since
the 1997 assessment completed for the Celebration Park Area, was dominated by a
deciduous forest plant community, as not exhibiting an intermittent defined channel, and
as entering a stormwater system at the southern end of the wetland. In addition, the
prior mitigation work completed along Wetland Z as a part of the development of the
Celebration Park has added a variety of young coniferous trees and a mixture of native
shrubs to the buffer area.
wetlands, streams, fisheries, wildlife — mitigation and permitting solutions
P.O. Box 1088, Puyallup, Washington 98371
253-845-5119 contact@habitattechnologies.net
As defined, Wetland Z was identified as meeting the present criteria for designation as a
City of Federal Way Category III Wetland. This wetland received a total of 17 points for
total functions which included a total of 4 points for habitat functions (Appendix A). As
such, the present City of Federal Way buffer for this wetland would be 60 feet in width.
With a Category III Wetland rating and a standard buffer of 60 feet it appears that the
standard buffer for this wetland would generally follow the existing chain link fence
along the western boundary of Parcel 1721049034. In addition, as discussed it would
appear beneficial that any required landscaping associated with the future development
of Parcel 1721049034 be composed on native species located along the western
boundary of the parcel.
Thank you for your attention to this site planning.
Sincerely,
7�io�ra� � �e�rrhg
Thomas D. Deming, PWS
Habitat Technologies
cc. Mr. Paul Rasmussen, @ Cascadia Senior Living
e-mail paulr@cascadiaseniorliving.com
2
18116
Appendix A — 2014 Wetland Rating Worksheet
18116
Wetland name or number Z
RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington
Name of wetland (or ID #): Wetland Z Date of site visit: 13 JUL 2018
Rated by Habitat Technologies Trained by Ecology? x Yes No Date of training 2014
HGM Class used for rating Depressional Wetland has multiple HGM classes?__X_Y N
NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined).
.Source of base aerial photo/map Google
OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY 3 (based on functions x or special characteristics_)
1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS
Category I —Total score = 23 - 27
Category II — Total score = 20 - 22
X Category III — Total score = 16 - 19
Category IV — Total score = 9 - 15
FUNCTION
Improving
Water quality
Hydrologic
-Habitat
Wetland of High Conservation Value
Circle the appropriate ratings
Bog
Site Potential
H L
HMD L
HMQ L
I
Landscape Potential
H ® L
H M L
H M
None of the above
Value
® M L
HM❑ L
H M M
TOTAL
;Score Based on
Ratings
7
6
4
17
2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland
CHARACTERISTIC
CATEGORY
Estuarine
I II
Wetland of High Conservation Value
I
Bog
I
Mature Forest
I
Old Growth Forest
I
Coastal Lagoon
I II
Interdunal
I II III IV
None of the above
x
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update
Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2011"
Score for each
function based
on three
ratings
(order of ratings
Is not
important)
9 = H,H,H
8 = H,H,M
7 = H,H,L
7 = H,M,M
6 = H,M,L
6 = M,M,M
5 = H,L,L
5 = M,M,L
4 = M,L,L
3 = L, L, L
1
Wetland name or number Z
Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for
Western Washington
Depressional Wetlands
Map of:
To answer questions:
Figure #
Cowardin plant classes
D 1.3, H 1.1, H 1.4
Wi
Hydroperiods
D 1.4, H 1.2
W2
Location of outlet (can be added to map of hydroperiods)
D 1.1, D 4.1
W2
Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure)
D 2.2, D 5.2
W2
Map of the contributing basin
D 4.3, D 5.3
W3
1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including
polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat
H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3
W4
Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website)
D 3.1, D 3.2
W5
Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web)
D 3.3
W6
Riverine Wetlands
Map of: To answer questions:
Figure #
Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4
Cowardin plant classes
Hydroperiods H 1.2
Ponded depressions R 1.1
L 1.2
Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) R 2.4
Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure)
Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants R 1.2, R 4.2
Width of unit vs. width of stream (can be added to anotherfigure) R 4.1
N/A
Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3, R 5.2
Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website)
L 3. 1, L 3.2
1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3
polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat
Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web)
L 3.3
Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) R 3.1
Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) R 3.2, R 3.3
S 3.1, S 3.2
Lake Fringe Wetlands
Map of:
To answer questions:
Figure #
Cowardin plant classes
L 1.1, L 4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4
Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants
L 1.2
Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure)
L 2.2
1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including
polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat
H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3
N/A
Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website)
L 3. 1, L 3.2
Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web)
L 3.3
H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3
Slope Wetlands
Map of:
To answer questions:
Figure #
Cowardin plant classes
H 1.1, H 1.4
Hydroperiods
H 1.2
Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants
S 1.3
Plant cover of dense, rigid trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants
(can be added to figure above)
S4.1
N/A
Boundary of 150 ft buffer (can be added to another figure)
S 2.1, S 5.1
1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including
polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat
H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3
Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website)
S 3.1, S 3.2
Screen capture of list of TIVIDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web)
S3.3
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update
Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015
Wetland name or number Z
HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington
For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated.
If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you
probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in
questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8.
1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods?
NO- goto2
YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1
1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)?
NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe
Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it
is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to
score functions for estuarine wetlands.
2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater
and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit.
NO -go toTj YES - The wetland class is Flats
If your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands.
3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria?
_The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any
plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size;
_At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m).
YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe)
4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria?
The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual),
The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from
seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks,
The water leaves the wetland without being impounded.
NO- gotos
YES - The wetland class is Slope
NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and
shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft
deep).
5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria?
The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that
stream or river,
The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years.
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update
Rating Rnrm _ R ffectiva laniwa yr 1 ?n1r,
Wetland name or number Z
NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine
NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not
flooding
6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the
surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior
of the wetland.
NO-goto7
YES - The wetland class is Depressional
7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank
flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be
maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural
outlet.
NO- goto8
YES - The wetland class is Depressional
8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM
classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small
stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY
WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT
AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the
appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the
wetland unit being scored.
NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or
more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2
is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the
total area.
HGM classes within the wetland unit
being rated
HGM class to
use in rating
Slope + Riverine
Riverine
Slope +Depressional
Depressional
Slope + Lake Fringe
Lake Fringe
Depressional + Riverine along stream
within boundary of depression
Depressional
Depressional + Lake Fringe
Depressional
Riverine + Lake Fringe
Riverine
Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other
class of freshwater wetland
Treat as
ESTUARINE
Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have
more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the
rating.
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 4
Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015
Wetland name or number Z
DEPRESSLONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS
D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No -_0
1
Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water
quality
D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0
D 1.0. Does the site have the {potential to improve water quality?
D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3?
Source Yes = 1 No = 0
0
D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland:
2
Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet).
points = 3
Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing
outlet.
2
points = 2
Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing
points = 1
Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch.
points = 1
D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface [or duff laver] is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes
= 4 No = 0
0
D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes):
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area
points = 5
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area
points = 3
5
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/io of area
points = 1
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area
points = 0
D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation:
This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual.
Area seasonally ponded is > Y2 total area of wetland
points = 4
2
Area seasonally ponded is > X total area of wetland
points = 2
Area seasonally ponded is < X total area of wetland
points = 0
Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above
1 9
Rating of Site Potential If score is: 12-16 = H X 6-11= M �0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page
D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site?
D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No -_0
1
D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0
1
D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0
0
D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3?
Source Yes = 1 No = 0
0
Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above
2
Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 or 4 = H X 1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page
11 3 0 1- aL_ 1' 'J J L he -: 'le ?
lJ J.V. is he water quality improveflleflt pr VVIUeU buy tflC site ValUaule to society?
D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the
303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0
0
D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0
1
D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer VES
if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No =O
1
Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above
2
Rating of Value If score is: X_2-4 = H —1 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update
Rating Form e Effective January 1, 2015
Wetland name or number Z
DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS W'ETLAND'S
Hydrologic Functions - indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation
D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion?
D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland:
0
Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4
1
Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2
2
Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1
Wetland has an unconstrictgd, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0
1
D 4.2. Death of storage during wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands
with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part.
Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7
Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5
Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3
3
The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3
Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1
1
Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0
D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin
contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself.
The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5
The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3
The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0
Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5
Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above
10
Rating of Site Potential If score is: 12-16 = H X 6-11= M _0-5 = L
Record the rating on the first page
D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site?
D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0
1
D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0
0
D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at
>1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0
1
Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above
2
Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H X 1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page
D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society?
D 6.1. The unit is in a landsca a that has floodinq problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around
the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met.
The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has
damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds):
• Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2
• Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1
1
Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1
The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the
water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0
There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0
D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan?
0
Yes=2 No=O
Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above
1
Rating of Value If score is: _2-4=H X 1=M _0 = L
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update
Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015
Record the rating on the first page
Wetland name or number Z
These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes.
A6lTAT I=UNCTION5 - Indicators -that sitefunctionsto provide important habitat
H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat?
H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the
Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold
of % ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked.
Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4
Emergent 3 structeres: points = 2
1
Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1
X Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0
If the unit has a Forested class, check if.•
X The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy; shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover)
that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon
H 1.2. Hydroperiods
Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover
more than 10% of the wetland or''/< ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods).
Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3
X Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2
Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1
1
X Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0
Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland
Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland
Lake Fringe wetland 2 points
Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points
H 1.3. Richness of plant species
Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz.
Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name
the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle
2
If you counted: > 19 species points = 2
5 - 19 species points = 1
< 5 species points = 0
H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats
Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or
the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you
have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high.
0
J (:*D ( ftO()
None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points
All three diagrams ----��
oo
in this row
are HIGH = 3points
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13
Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015
Wetland name or number Z
H 1.5. Special habitat features:
Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points.
__Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long).
Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland
Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m)
over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m)
Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for Benning (> 30 degree
slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered
where wood is exposed)
X At least Y4 ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are
permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians)
X Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of
strata)
Total for H 1
M
Add the points in the boxes above I 7
Rating of Site Potential If score is: 15-18 = H X 7-14 -_'M _0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page
H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site?
H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit).
Calculate: % undisturbed habitat 0 + [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2] 5 = 5 %
If total accessible habitat is:
>'/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points 3
20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2
10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1
< 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0
H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland.
Calculate: % undisturbed habitat 10 [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]Q = 0 %
Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3
Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches
Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches
Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon
H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If
> 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use
<- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensi
Total for H 2
Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H 1-3=M x<1=L
H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society?
❑c
points = 2 1
points = 1
points = 0
points = (- 2)-2�
points = 0
Add the points in the boxes above 0
Record the rating on the first page
H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score
that applies to the wetland being rated.
Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2
— It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page)
— It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists)
— It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species
— It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources
— It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a
Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan
Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1
Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0
Rating of Value If score is: _2=H _1= M x0 = L
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update
Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015
n
Record the rating on the first page
14
Wetland name or number Z
WDFW Priority Habitats
BEiorb habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can
be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington.
177 pp. ubl' s wci f or access the list from here:
V ll
Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is
independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat.
Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha).
Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and
wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report).
Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and (orbs on shallow soils over bedrock.
Old-growth/Mature forests: Old-growth west of Ca"ade crest - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-
layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200
years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less
than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that 4
found in old-growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest.
— Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak
component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above).
Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and
terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other.
— Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet
prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above).
— Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide
functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources.
— Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and
Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report -
see web link on previous page).
Caves. A nat„rall...,n..,,rr occurring Caaviby .. 4A , ......�.....,._f4' ....., ---. 3 -------- ..- -3 __ tel- -----`'- --- --"- --- -'-
�.ara..r. naturally v1.L. u11111� �avuy, 1c�.cJa, vulu, U1 ay JLU111 U1111LU11.U1111C1.LCU F1dJSdgt:b U11UC1 LllC tiff-Ul lil SU11S, FUCK,
ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human.
— Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft -(7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation.
— Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite,
and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs.
— Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to
enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western
Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft
(6 m) long.
Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed
elsewhere.
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15
Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015
CITY OF
,.
Fede ra I Way
Centered on Opportunity
August 10, 2018
Tom Deming
Habitat Technologies
PO Box 1088
Puyallup, WA 98371
tom@habitattechnologies, net
CIIY HALL
33325 8th Avenue Solth
Federal VVay, WA 98003-6325
;253) 835=7000
www, cityofredoraA,,1Aiy, corn
Jii v Ferreb; Mayor
RE: File #18 -.103574 -00 -AD; RESPONSE LETTER
Varga Property 'Wetland, 1403 South 330'h Street, Parcel # 172104-9034, Federal Way
Dear Mr. Dealing:
The Department of Community Development is in receipt of the review memo for a wetland on the City's
Celebration Park property, known as Wetland Z, prepared by Habitat Technologies, dated July 161, 2018.
Fol lowing submittal of'an initial Wetland and Drainage Corridor Delineation Assessment, dated June 6,
2018, you met with city staff oil June 26, 2018, to discuss present conditions of the site. The city
requested rcvisions to include rating the wetland and buffer pursuant to Federal lYay Revised Cock
(F -WRC) 19.145.420.
FINDINGS
After review of the revised report, staff concurs with the findings that the onsite wetland meets
characteristics of a Category ll1 wetland with a 60 -foot buffer. Based on the review memo the standard
buffer the Wetland Z would generally follow the existing chain link fence along the western boundary of
Parcel # 172104-9034, but uo map/site plan with the exact wetland boundary and buffer was provided
with the review memo.
FUTURE ITEMS
When submitting for a fixture development on parcel 172104-9034, the applicant must include a scaled
site plan showing the boundaries of the offsite wetland with the associated 60 -foot buffer.
If you have any questions regarding this letter or your upcoming project, please contact me at 253-835-
2641 or beck} chapin(«),eityoffederalway.co►n.
Sincerely,
Becky C hI , I
Senior Planner
Doc l.D 78142