2022 07-06 Planning Commission Agenda PacketCommissioners City Staff
Lawson Bronson, Chair Wayne Carlson, Vice-Chair Keith Niven, Planning Manager
Tim O’Neil Hope Elder Kari Cimmer, Admin & Permit Center Supervisor
Diana Noble-Gulliford Tom Medhurst 253-835-2629
Jae So Anna Patrick, Alternate www.cityoffederalway.com
Vickie Chynoweth, Alternate Vacant, Alternate
K:\01 - Document Review\Planning\Planning Commission Documents\2022 07 July 06\2022 07-06 Planning Commission Agenda.docx
City of Federal Way
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 6, 2022 City Hall
6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Planning Commission Meeting of May 18, 2022
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
5. COMMISSION BUSINESS
a. Review of policies for the Shoreline Master Program Chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan
6. STAFF BUSINESS
a. Manager’s Report
7. NEXT MEETING
a. July 20, 2022 – Regular Meeting
8. ADJOURNMENT
Planning Commission meetings are held in-person.
To request accommodation to attend or to provide public comment virtually, please contact Kari Cimmer at 253-835-2629 or
karic@cityoffederalway.com, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 5, 2022.
Page 1 of 52
Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 May 18, 2022
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 18, 2022
6:00 p.m. City Hall / Hybrid
MEETING MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Bronson called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioners present: Lawson Bronson, Hope Elder, Tim O’Neil, Tom Medhurst, Diana Noble-Gulliford,
Jae So, and Anna Patrick.
Chair Bronson excused Commissioners Carlson and Chynoweth.
City Staff present: Planning Manager Keith Niven, City Attorney Kent van Alstyne, and Admin & Permit
Center Supervisor Kari Cimmer.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Medhurst noted two corrections needed to be made on the May 4, 2022 minutes, on Page
Two, Paragraph 12 and 14: Medford should have been Medhurst.
Commissioner O’Neil moved to approve the May 4, 2022 minutes as corrected. Second by Commissioner
Elder.
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment.
5. COMMISSION BUSINESS
Senior Planner Chaney Skadsen made a brief presentation on the Comprehensive Plan amendments links on
the City’s website. She demonstrated the ease of access and use of the website and asked that the
Commissioners share the links as they are able.
City Attorney van Alstyne began his training presentation, “Refresher to Planning Commission Members”
to the Commission members. The three primary subjects will be Open Meetings Act, the Public Records
Act, the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, and Federal Way Code of Ethics. Commissioners asked clarifying
questions to the City Attorney van Alstyne throughout the presentation.
Page 2 of 52
Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 May 18, 2022
6. MANAGER REPORT
Planning Manager Niven stated that there are no agenda items for the June 1, 2022 meeting and asked if
there is any Commission business for that date. Hearing none, he announced the cancellation of the June 1,
2022 meeting.
Planning Chair Bronson asked for staff to provide a document containing the contact information for all of
the Commissioners and Staff. Ms. Cimmer noted that one will be sent along with the electronic versions of
the meeting handouts on Thursday, May 19th.
7. NEXT MEETING
The next Planning Commission will be at 6:00 p.m. on June 15, 2022.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Medhurst moved that the meeting be adjourned; Second by Commissioner O’Neil.
The meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m.
Attest: Approved by Commission:
_______________________________________ __________________________
Kari Cimmer, Admin & Permit Center Supervisor Date
Page 3 of 52
SMP - 1
CHAPTER TEN – SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM
10.0 INTRODUCTION
Shorelines of the state are among the most valuable and fragile of its
natural resources; and, there is great concern throughout the state relating
to their utilization, protection, restoration, and preservation. Coordinated
planning is necessary to protect the public interest associated with the
shorelines of the state while, at the same time, recognizing and balancing
the rights of private property owners.
The Goals and Policies in this Chapter set the direction for the
preservation, restoration, use, modifications, and development of the
shoreline areas within the City limits. These goals and policies also
supplement and are consistent with the goal and policies of the Natural
Environment Chapter (Chapter 8) of the Comprehensive Plan.
Washington’s Shoreline Management Act, Chapter 90.58 RCW (SMA),
was passed by the Legislature in 1971 and adopted by the public in a
1972 referendum. The goal of the SMA is “to prevent the inherent harm
in an uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state’s
shorelines.” The SMA establishes a balance of authority between local
and state government. Cities and counties are the primary regulators, but
the State has authority to review local shoreline management programs
and permit decisions.
The SMA contains three broad policies:
• Encourage water-dependent and water-oriented uses: “uses
shall be preferred which are consistent with control of pollution
and prevention of damage to the natural environment or are
unique to or dependent upon use of the states’ shorelines....”
• Promote public access: “the public’s opportunity to enjoy the
Page 4 of 52
SMP - 2
physical and aesthetic qualities of natural shorelines of the state
shall be preserved to the greatest extent feasible consistent with
the overall best interest of the state and the people generally.”
• Protect shoreline natural resources, including “...the land and
its vegetation and wildlife, and the water of the state and their
aquatic life....”
At the time of incorporation in 1990, the city adopted King County’s
Shoreline Master Program. The city developed and adopted its own SMP
in 1998 and integrated the SMP into the Federal Way Comprehensive
Plan. In 1999, and most-recently amended in 2019, the city adopted
associated development regulations (Title 15 FWRC) for the shoreline.
10.1 Shoreline Jurisdiction
The shoreline jurisdiction of the City of Federal Way is shown in Map
SMP-1. The shoreline jurisdiction includes waters that have been
designated as “shorelines of statewide significance” or “shorelines of the
state” and adjacent lands or “shorelands.” The shoreline jurisdiction
within the city limits includes approximately 16.9 miles of shoreline.
Portions of Puget Sound within the city limits waterward of the line of
extreme low tide are defined as “shorelines of statewide significance”
[RCW 90.58.030(2)(e)(iii)]. Federal Way Puget Sound shoreline
represents approximately 4.8 miles of regulated shoreline. This measure
includes areas waterward of the OHWM (ordinary high-water mark)
which extend to the line of extreme low tide.
Federal Way shorelines also include approximately 12.1 miles of
shoreline found along freshwater lakes. The regulated lakes currently
within the City limits are:
■ Steel Lake
■ The northwestern shore of Lake Killarney
■ North Lake
In addition, 5 freshwater lake shorelines
located in the City’s PAAs (Potential
Annexation Areas) are included in this master
program update; these include:
■ Star Lake
■ Lake Dolloff
■ Lake Geneva
■ the remaining portion of Lake Killarney
■ Five Mile Lake
There are no rivers or streams meeting the
definition of “shorelines of the state” within
the City or its annexation area. However,
streams such as Joe’s Creek and Lakota Creek discharge to the Puget
Page 5 of 52
SMP - 3
Sound shoreline. The mouths of these streams and the upstream extent of
tidal influence are considered under shoreline jurisdiction because of their
association with the Puget Sound shoreline.
10.2 Shoreline Use
Use of shorelines varies through the City from development and
recreation to natural habitat. A portion of the Federal Way Puget Sound
Shoreline (Map SMP-2) has been designated as shellfish protection area.
Goals and Policies are included in this Chapter to consider and facilitate
development and use of property that protects against adverse effects to
the ecological health of the shoreline.
10.3 Public Access & Recreation
Opportunities for active and
passive recreational
opportunities should be
created. Goals and Policies
are included in this Chapter to
help assure and to encourage
appropriate and inviting
physical and visual public
access to and along the city’s
designated shorelines while
caring for the indigenous
shoreline characteristics.
10.4 Conservation & Restoration
Goals and Policies
are included in this
Chapter to help
conserve and
manage the unique,
fragile, and scenic
natural elements of
the city’s shorelines
for the continuing
benefit and
enjoyment of the
community.
10.5 Historic & Cultural Resources
Helping to preserve the historic, cultural, scientific, and educational sites
within the shoreline that reflect our community’s unique heritage and
Page 6 of 52
SMP - 4
create or contribute to our collective sense of place is achieved through
the Goals and Policies of this Chapter.
10.6 Circulation
Goals and Policies are incorporated into this Chapter to ensure existing and
proposed thoroughfares, transportation routes, and other public facilities
are considered and that there is a safe, convenient, and multimodal
circulation system within the shoreline area to provide for the efficient
movement of people without unduly disrupting the ecological functions of
the shoreline environment.
10.7 Environmental Designations
The shorelines of the state within Federal Way have been categorized
into three designations:
■ Shoreline Residential
■ Urban Conservancy
■ Natural
The purpose of these designations is to differentiate between areas whose
geographical features, ecological functions, and existing development
pattern imply differing objectives regarding their management, use, and
future development. The categories are designed to encourage uses in
each environment, which enhance the character of the environment while
at the same time requiring reasonable standards and restrictions on
development so that the character of the environment is not diminished.
10.7.1 SHORELINE RESIDENTIAL
Purpose
To accommodate residential development and appurtenant structures that
are consistent with SMP Guidelines [WAC 173-26-211(5)(f)] and to
provide for appropriate public access and recreational uses.
Criteria
Areas that are predominantly single-family or multi-family residential
development.
Management Policies
1. Residential uses shall be the primary use. Development and
redevelopment activities shall be focused within already
developed areas.
2. Standards shall be developed and implemented for density or
minimum frontage width, setbacks, lot coverage limitations,
buffers, shoreline stabilization, vegetation conservation, critical
area protection, and water quality. These standards shall ensure
that new development does not result in a net loss of shoreline
ecological functions or further degrade other shoreline values,
considering the environmental limitations and sensitivity of the
Page 7 of 52
SMP - 5
shoreline area, the level of infrastructure and services available,
and other comprehensive planning considerations.
3. Multi-family and multi-lot residential and recreational
developments shall provide public access and joint use for
community recreational facilities.
4. All residential development shall occur in a manner consistent
with the policies listed under SMPG2.
10.7.2 URBAN CONSERVANCY
Purpose
To protect and restore ecological functions of open space, flood plain, and
other sensitive lands where they exist in urban and developed settings,
while allowing a variety of compatible uses.
Criteria
Shoreline areas appropriate and planned for development that are
compatible with maintaining or restoring the ecological functions of the
area that are not generally suitable for water-dependent, high-intensity
uses. The Urban Conservancy environment is applied if any of the
following characteristics apply:
1. They have open space, flood plain, or other sensitive areas that
should not be more intensively developed;
2. They have potential for ecological restoration;
3. They retain important ecological functions, even though partially
developed; or
4. They have the potential for development that is compatible with
ecological restoration.
Management Policies
1. Property use is allowed, provided it preserves the natural character
of the area or promotes preservation of open space, flood plain,
bluffs, or sensitive lands either directly or over the long term.
Water-oriented uses should be given priority over non-water-
oriented uses. For shoreline areas adjacent to commercially
navigable waters, water-dependent uses should be given highest
priority. Uses that result in restoration of ecological functions
should be allowed if the use is otherwise compatible with the
purpose of the environment and the setting.
2. Standards should be developed and implemented for
management of environmentally sensitive or designated critical
areas to ensure that new development does not result in a net loss
of shoreline ecological functions, or further degrade other
shoreline values. Development standards should be developed
and implemented for density or minimum frontage width,
setbacks, lot coverage limitations, buffers, shoreline
stabilization, vegetation conservation, critical area protection,
and water quality.
3. Public access and public recreation objectives should be
implemented whenever feasible and significant ecological
Page 8 of 52
SMP - 6
impacts can be mitigated.
4. Aesthetic mitigations shall be incorporated, as appropriate,
including sign control regulations, architectural design standards,
landscaping requirements, and other such means.
10.7.3 NATURAL
Purpose
To protect and preserve those shoreline areas that are relatively free of
human influence, or that include intact or minimally-degraded shoreline
functions. These systems require that only very low intensity uses be
allowed in order to maintain the ecological functions and ecosystem-
wide processes. Consistent with the policies of the designation, the city
should include planning for restoration of degraded shorelines within this
environment.
Criteria
A Natural environment designation shall be assigned to shoreline areas if
any of the following characteristics apply: (A) the shoreline is
ecologically intact and therefore, currently performing an important,
irreplaceable function or ecosystem-wide process that would be damaged
by human activity; (B) the shoreline is considered to represent
ecosystems and geologic types that are of particular scientific and
educational interest; or, (C) the shoreline is unable to support new
development or uses without significant adverse impacts to ecological
functions or risk to human safety.
Management Policies
1. Any use that would substantially degrade the ecological functions or
natural character of the shoreline area shall not be allowed.
2. The following new uses shall be prohibited:
• Commercial uses;
• Industrial uses;
• Non-water-oriented recreation; and
• Roads, utility corridors, and parking areas that can be located
outside of the Natural-designated shorelines.
3. Single-family residential development may be allowed only if the
density and intensity of such use is minimized to protect ecological
functions and be consistent with the purpose of the environment.
4. Scientific, historical, cultural, educational research uses, and low-
intensity water-oriented recreational access uses may be allowed
provided that no significant ecological impact will result.
5. New development or significant vegetation removal that would
reduce the capability of vegetation to perform normal ecological
functions shall not be allowed. The subdivision of property in a
configuration that, to achieve its intended purpose, will require
significant vegetation removal or shoreline modification that
adversely impacts ecological functions shall not be allowed.
Page 9 of 52
SMP - 7
10.8 SHORELINE GOALS & POLICIES
This section contains the goals and policies of the Land Use Chapter of
the Comprehensive Plan. Goals and Policies addressing the overall land
use vision and the interplay of various land uses is contained in this
Chapter.
Goals
SMPG1 Shoreline areas shall permit a variety of development types
in accordance with the FWRC, FWCP, and Shoreline Master
Plan designations. Designs, densities, and locations for all
allowed uses and developments should shall consider
physical and natural features of the shoreline and prevent a
net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
SMPG2 Residential use of shoreline areas should shall be continued
and encouraged in areas that have not been designated as
Natural environments by the SMP, allowing a variety of
housing types. New development or redevelopment of
residential uses should cause result in no net loss of
shoreline ecological function, as identified in the SMP’s
Shoreline Inventory Characterization and Analysis.
SMPG3 Shoreline areas designated by the FWCP and the SMP to
allow for commercial development shall permit a variety of
commercial and office park development types. New
development or expansion of existing commercial and office
uses should result in no net loss of shoreline ecological
functions.
SMPG4 Regional and sub-regional utility facilities, including
communications, (radio, TV, and telephone), energy
distribution (petroleum products, natural gas, and
electricity), water, sanitary sewers, and storm sewers should
not be allowed in shoreline areas unless there is no
alternative location. Design, location, construction, and
maintenance of utility facilities must comply with the
requirements of SMP regulationsTitle 15 FWRC and other
federal, state, and local laws, and result in no net loss of
shoreline ecological functions.
SMPG5 Limit shoreline stabilization—which includes any action
taken to reduce adverse impacts caused by current, flood,
wake, or wave action—including the use of bank
stabilization, rip rap, and bulk heading, to that which is
necessary to protect existing improvements.
SMPG6 Docks and moorages should be allowed when associated
with residential, recreational, or other public facilities. The
design, location, and construction of any dock, pier, or
Page 10 of 52
SMP - 8
moorage shallould avoid, to the greatest extent possible,
adverse effects on shoreline ecological functions.
SMPG7 Increase public access to and enjoyment of shoreline areas
through improvements to physical access on publicly- owned
lands and improved visual access, provided that private
rights, public safety, and shoreline ecological functions
remain intact.
SMPG8 Provide additional shoreline- dependent and water- oriented
recreational opportunities that are diverse, convenient, and
adequate for the regional population, and that will not result
in a net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
SMPG9 Recreational experiences that depend on, or utilize, the
shoreline (including: harvesting activities of fish, shellfish,
fowl, minerals, and driftwood; various forms of boating,
swimming, and utilization of shoreline pathways; and
watching or recording activities, such as photography,
painting, or the viewing of water -dependent activities) shall
be encouraged within parks and other public access areas,
given they do not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological
functions and are allowed uses under state and local
regulations.
SMPG10 Preserve and protect the ecological functions of intact
natural shorelines and ecologically sensitive shorelines as
outlined within the shoreline inventory and characterization.
SMPG11 Assure preservation of unique and non-renewable natural
resources and assure conservation of renewable natural
resources for the benefit of existing and future generations
and the public interest.
SMPG12 Develop regional solutions with other jurisdictions, tribes,
and interested parties to resolve the challenge of protecting
shoreline ecological functions, while also managing
shoreline developments.
SMPG13 Pursue projects to restore and enhance shoreline habitats
and processes on publicly -owned lands.
SMPG14 Encourage voluntary restoration projects on private
property in degraded shoreline environments.
SMPG15 Provide ample opportunitiesy for the public to learn about
the ecological aspects and community values of the City’s
shorelines.
SMPG16 Identify, protect, preserve, and restore important
Page 11 of 52
SMP - 9
archaeological, historical, and cultural sites located in or
associated with Federal Way’s shorelines for scientific and
educational purposes.
SMPG17 Circulation systems in shoreline areas should be limited to
those that are shoreline dependent or would serve shoreline
dependent uses,; or, those that must pass through shoreline
areas. The environment shall be protected from any
significant adverse effects of circulation systems required in
shoreline areas.
Policies
SMPP1 Shoreline land and water areas particularly suited for specific
and appropriate uses should shall be designated and reserved
for such uses.
SMPP2 Shoreline land and water uses should satisfy the economic,
social, and physical needs of the regional population, but
should shall not lead to a net loss of ecological functions in
the shoreline areas.
SMPP3 Like or compatible shoreline uses should be clustered or
distributed in a rational manner, rather than allowed to
develop haphazardly.
SMPP4 Multiple uses of shoreline should be encouraged where
location and integration of compatible uses or activities are
feasible.
SMPP5 Shoreline ecological functions shouldall be protected from
uses or activities that will have an adverse effect on them.
SMPP6 Non-residential uses or activities that are not shoreline
dependent should be encouraged to located or relocated
away from the shoreline.
SMPP7 Federal Way shallould consider the goals, objectives, and
policies of the SMP in all land use management decisions
regarding the use or development of adjacent uplands where
such use or development may have an adverse effect on
designated shorelines.
SMPP8 Development shouldall be regulated accordingly in shoreline
areas known to contain development hazards or which would
adversely impact designated critical areas as identified in
FWRC Title 15.
a. All development shouldall be prohibited within the 100-
year floodplain, except single-family residential and water-
dependent or water-related uses.
b. All development shouldall be prohibited in shoreline
Page 12 of 52
SMP - 10
areas of severe or very severe landslide hazard.
c. All development should be regulated in shoreline areas
with slopes of 40 percent or greater.
d.c. Shoreline areas containing other potential hazards (e.g.,
geological conditions, unstable subsurface conditions,
erosion hazards, steep slopes, or groundwater or seepage
problems) should be regulated as necessary to avoid
unsafe development and disturbance of sensitive areas.
SMPP9 Promote respect of private property rights while
implementing SMA requirements.
SMPP10 Residential developments shouldall be designed to achieve
no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and minimize
interference with visual and physical access. Unavoidable
impacts to the shoreline environment from residential
development shouldall be mitigated to assure no net loss of
shoreline ecological functions.
a. Residential development in designated critical areas or
their associated buffers should shall be regulated as
required by the City’s SMP regulations.
b. Residential development on piers or over water is
prohibited.
c. Landfill for residential development that reduces water
surface or floodplain capacity shall not be permitted.
d. In residential developments, the water’s edge shouldall
be kept free of buildings and fences.
e. Development standards shouldall require the retention of
natural shoreline vegetation and other natural features of
the landscape to the greatest extent possible during site
development and construction.
SMPP11 Residential use of shorelines should shall not displace or
encroach upon areas that have existing or are designated as
supporting water-dependent shoreline uses.
SMPP12 Residential densities should will be determined with regard
for the physical capabilities of the shoreline areas and public
services requirements and include the following
considerations:
a. Subdivisions and new development should shall be
designed to adequately protect aesthetic characteristics
of the water and shoreline environment.
b. New residential development should shall only be
allowed in those shoreline areas where the provision for
sewage disposal and drainage ways are of such a
standard that adjoining water bodies would not be
adversely affected by pollution or siltation.
Page 13 of 52
SMP - 11
c. Residential development along shorelines should shall
be setback from the ordinary high water mark far enough
to make unnecessary such protective measures as filling,
bulk heading, construction groins, or jetties, or
substantial re-grading of the site.
d. Residential developments should shall be designed to
enhance the appearance of the shoreline and not
substantially interfere with the views from public
property or access to the water.
e. The shoreline ecosystems, processes, and functions
identified in the Shoreline Inventory and
Characterization should shall be considered when
determining standards for residential development
patterns within the shoreline environment.
SMPP13 Residential subdivisions in shoreline areas should provide
public pedestrian access to the shorelines within the
development in accordance with the public access and
recreation element of this master program.
SMPP14 Developers of recreational projects such as summer homes,
cabins, campgrounds, and similar facilities should shall
satisfactorily demonstrate:
a. The suitability of the site to accommodate the proposed
development without adversely affecting the shoreline
environment and water resources.
b. Adequate provisions for all necessary utilities, including
refuse disposal.
SMPP15 Consideration should shall be made of the effect a structure
will have on scenic value, and when feasible, should include
opportunities for public access to shoreline areas.
SMPP16 Commercial and office structures and ancillary facilities that
are not shoreline dependent or water-oriented should shall be
setback from the water’s edge and designed to avoid adverse
impacts to shoreline ecological functions.
SMPP17 The use of porous materials and other low impact
development design alternatives should beare encouraged for
paved areas to allow water to penetrate and percolate into the
soil. Use of holding systems should beare encouraged to
control the runoff rate from parking lots and rooftops.
SMPP18 Commercial and office development located within shoreline
areas should shall be constructed to withstand normal rain
and flooding conditions without contributing pollution to the
watercourse or shoreline. State and local best management
practices should shall be implemented to protect the natural
Page 14 of 52
SMP - 12
shoreline environment from impacts associated with
stormwater runoff.
SMPP19 Commercial and office development that is not water-
dependent should shall provide a buffer zone of native
vegetation for erosion control.
SMPP20 Commercial aquaculture activities should shall be
prohibited.
SMPP21 Utilities that could allow for growth should shall not be
extended into or along shorelines without prior approval of
such extension by the appropriate land use authority.
SMPP22 Utilities located in shoreline environments inappropriate for
development should not make service available to those
areas.
SMPP23 In developed shorelines not served by utilities, utility
construction should be encouraged toshall be located where
it can be shown that water quality will be maintained or
improved.
SMPP24 Federal Way should be consulted prior to, or at the time of,
application for construction of regional utility facilities to be
located in or along shorelines.
SMPP25 Utility corridors crossing shorelines shallould be encouraged
to consolidate and concentrate or share rights-of-way where:
a. Public access or view corridors would be improved.
b. Concentration or sharing would not hinder the ability of
the utility systems to be installed, operated, or
maintained safely.
c. Water quality would be as good as or better than if
separate corridors were present.
SMPP26 Public access should beis encouraged where rights-of-way
for regional utility facilities cross shorelines in the City, and
where public safety and facility security would not be
compromised.
SMPP27 New utility facilities shallould be located so as to not require
extensive shoreline protection nor to restrict water flow,
circulation, or navigation; .
SMPP28 New utility facilities and rights-of-way should be located to
preserve the natural landscape and minimize conflicts with
present and planned uses of the land on which they are
located.; and, shall
Page 15 of 52
SMP - 13
SMPP29 New utility facilities and rights-of-way should be located
and designed to minimize detrimental visual impacts from
the water and adjacent uplands.
SMPP30 New freestanding personal wireless service facilities are
prohibited from locating within the shoreline environment.
SMPP31 Shoreline stabilization should shall be allowed only if it is
clearly demonstrated that shoreline protection is necessary to
protect existing improvements.
SMPP32 Structural solutions to reduce shoreline erosion should shall
be allowed only after it is demonstrated that nonstructural
solutions, such as bioengineering or soft-shore armoring,
would not be able to protect existing development.
SMPP33 Planning of shoreline stabilization shallould encompass
sizable stretches of lake or marine shorelines. This planning
should consider off-site erosion, accretion, or flood damage
that might occur as a result of shoreline protection structures
or activities.
SMPP34 Shoreline stabilization on marine and lake shorelines should
shall not be used as a means of creating new or newly
developable land.
SMPP35 Shoreline stabilization structures should shall allow passage
of ground and surface waters into the main water body.
SMPP36 Shoreline stabilization should not reduce the volume and
storage capacity of streams and adjacent wetlands or flood
plains.
SMPP37 Whenever shoreline stabilization is needed, bioengineered
alternatives such as natural berms and erosion control
vegetation plans should be favored over hard surfaced
structural alternatives such as concrete bulkheads and sheet
piles.
SMPP38 The burden of proof for the need for shoreline stabilization
to protect existing developments or proposed
redevelopments rests on the applicant.
SMPP39 Shoreline stabilization activities that may necessitate new or
increased shoreline protection on the same or other affected
properties where there has been no previous need for
protection should not be allowed.
SMPP40 New development shall be designed and located so as not to
require shoreline stabilization.
Page 16 of 52
SMP - 14
SMPP41 Areas of significance in the spawning, nesting, rearing, or
residency of aquatic and terrestrial biota should shall be
given special consideration in review of proposed shoreline
stabilization activities.
SMPP42 Shoreline stabilization activities shallould be discouraged in
areas where they would disrupt natural feeder bluffs
processes, important for maintaining beaches.
SMPP43 Open pile construction should shall be preferred where there
is significant littoral drift, where scenic values will not be
impaired, and where minimal alteration to the shoreline and
minimal damage to aquatic resources can be assured.
SMPP44 Piers, floats, and docks should shall be prohibited or limited
or permitted as a conditional use where conflicts with
recreational boaters and other recreational water activities
would create public safety hazards.
SMPP45 Where new docks are allowed, new residential development
of two or more dwellings should shall be required to provide
joint use or community dock facilities, when feasible, rather
than allow individual docks for each residence.
SMPP46 Temporary moorages should may be permitted for vessels
used in the construction of shoreline facilities. The design
and construction of such moorages shall be such that upon
termination of the project, aquatic habitat can be returned to
original condition within one year at no cost to the
environment or the public.
SMPP47 Shoreline structures that are abandoned or structurally unsafe
should shall be removed.
SMPP48 Docks, buoys, and other moorages should shall only be
authorized after consideration of:
a. The effect such structures have on wildlife and aquatic
life, water quality, unique and fragile areas, submerged
lands, and shoreline vegetation.
b. The effect such structures have on navigation,
recreational and commercial boating, shoreline access,
and scenic and aesthetic values.
c. The effect such structures have on water circulation,
sediment movement, and littoral drift.
SMPP49 Moorage buoys should beare preferred over moorage piles
on all tidal waters.
Page 17 of 52
SMP - 15
SMPP50 Development of public access should shall respect and
protect private rights that are held on shoreline property.
SMPP51 Public access should shall be maintained and regulated.
a. Public access should be policed and improved consistent
with intensity of use.
b. Provisions to restrict access as to nature, time, number of
people, and area may be appropriate for public
pedestrian easements and other public access areas
where there are spawning grounds, fragile aquatic life
habitats, or potential hazards for pedestrian safety.
SMPP52 Design of access should shall provide for the public health,
safety,
and enjoyment.
a. Appropriate signs should shall be used to designate
publicly-accessible owned shorelines.
b. Pedestrian and non-motorized physical and visual access
to the shoreline should beis encouraged.
c. Public access to and along the water’s edge should shall
be made available in publicly- owned shorelines in a
manner that protects shoreline ecological functions.
SMPP53 Acquisition and development of new shoreline public access
locations should shall be consistent with overall parks and
open space planning goals and policies.
a. Acquisition and development of shoreline properties
should shall be consistent with criteria and standards as
part of an overall park and open space master plan.
b. Where appropriate, utility and transportation rights-of-
way on the shoreline should shall be made available for
public access and use, consistent with the shoreline use
and circulation element policies.
c. Where appropriate, publicly-owned street ends that abut
the shoreline should shall be retained and/or reclaimed
for public access, consistent with the circulation
Transportation Chapterelement policies.
d. Shoreline recreational facilities and other public access
points should shall be connected by trails, bicycle
pathways, and other access links where possible.
SMPP54 To the extent possible, pPublic access shouldall be provided
in new shoreline developments.
a. Incentives should be used to encourage private property
owners to provide public shoreline access.
b. Public pedestrian easements should be considered in
Page 18 of 52
SMP - 16
future land use authorizations, and in the case of projects
along lakes, streams, ponds, and marine lands, whenever
shoreline features are appropriate for public use.
Shorelines of the City characterized by the following
should be considered for pedestrian easements:
1. Areas of significant, historical, geological, and/or
biological features and landmarks.
2. Areas presently being legally used, or historically
having been legally used, by the public along the
shoreline for access.
3. Where public funds have been expended on or
related to shoreline developments.
SMPP55 Shorelines in the City should be available to all people for
passive use, visual access, and enjoyment.
a. The City should preserve and provide publicly
accessible viewpoints, lookouts, and vistas of shorelines.
b. New developments should minimize visual and physical
obstruction of the water from adjacent roads and public
properties.
SMPP56 Physical and/or visual access to the water should use steep
slopes, view points from bluffs, stream valleys, and features
of special interest where it is possible to place pathways
consistent with public safety and without requiring extensive
flood or erosion protection.
SMPP57 Areas containing special shoreline recreation qualities not
easily duplicated should be made available for public use
and enjoyment.
a. Opportunities should shall be provided for the public to
understand natural shoreline processes and experience
natural resource features.
b. Public viewing and interpretation should shall be
encouraged at or near governmental shoreline facilities
when consistent with security and public safety.
SMPP58 Shoreline recreational use and development should shall
enhance environmental quality with minimal adverse effect
to natural resources.
a. Stretches of relatively inaccessible and unspoiled
shoreline should be available and designated as low
intensity or passive recreational use areas with minimal
development. Service facilities such as footpaths,
periphery parking, and adequate sanitary facilities should
only be located where appropriate, considering both
Page 19 of 52
SMP - 17
public safety and preservation of shoreline ecological
functions.
b. Beaches and other predominantly undeveloped
shorelines currently utilized for recreational purposes
should be available and designated as medium intensity
recreational use areas to be free from expansive
development; intensity of use should respect and protect
the natural qualities of the area.
c. Small or linear portions of the shoreline suitable for
recreational purposes should be available and designated
as transitional use areas that allow for variable intensities
of use, which may include vista points, pedestrian
walkways, water entry points, and access from the water;
utilizing stream floodplains, street ends, steep slopes,
and shoreline areas adjacent to waterfront roads.
d. At suitable locations, shorelines should be made
available and designated as high intensive use areas that
provide for a wide variety of recreational activities.
e. Overall design and development in shoreline recreational
areas should be sensitive to the physical site
characteristics and be consistent with the level of use in
the area concerned.
f. Recreation areas and ancillary facilities on or adjacent to
the shoreline should have adequate surveillance and
maintenance.
g. Non-water oriented recreational facility development
should be setback from the water’s edge, except where
appropriate in high intensive shoreline use areas.
SMPP59 The provision of adequate public shoreline recreation lands
should shall be based on an acquisition plan that is consistent
with overall goals for enhancing public access to the City’s
shorelines.
SMPP60 Existing buildings that enhance the character of the shoreline
should be incorporated into recreation areas wherever
possible.
SMPP61 A balanced variety of recreational opportunities should be
provided for people of different ages, health, family status,
and financial ability.
a. Shoreline recreation areas should provide opportunities
for different use intensities ranging from low (solitude)
to high (many people).
b. Opportunities for shoreline recreational experiences
should include developing access that accommodates a
range of differences in people’s physical mobility,
capabilities, and skill levels.
c. Recreational development should meet the demands of
Page 20 of 52
SMP - 18
population growth consistent with the carrying capacity
of the land and water resources.
SMPP62 Underwater parks should be extensions of shoreline parks,
and whenever possible, be created or enhanced by artificial
reefs where natural conditions or aquatic life could be
observed with minimal interference.
SMPP63 During storm events, hazardous conditions, or emergencies,
temporary use of public recreational shoreline areas by
boaters should be allowed.
SMPP64 Prime fishing areas should be given priority for recreational
use.
SMPP65 Recreational shellfish harvesting should be allowed on
public beaches subject to rules, regulations, and periodic
closures by Washington Department of Health and/or
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
SMPP66 Boating activities that increase shore erosion should be
discouraged.
SMPP67 Effective interpretation should be provided to raise the quality
of visitor experiences and provide an understanding of aquatic
and shoreline resource.
SMPP68 Manage designated critical areas in the shoreline—such as
critical aquifer recharge areas and wellhead protection areas,
frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas,
regulated wetlands, and streams—according to measures
provided in this SMP. These include shoreline environment
designations, allowed uses, development standards and
regulations, and mitigation for unavoidable impacts. They
should also be consistent with the policies contained in
FWCP Chapter 9, “Natural Environment.”
SMPP69 Develop standards, buffers, and mitigation requirements for
designated critical areas in the shoreline consistent with city-
wide regulations.
SMPP70 All new development and activity in or adjacent to shoreline
areas should be designed, constructed, and operated as to
avoid significant adverse impacts to ground or surface water
quality. Use of state and local best management practices
and guidance should be implemented to avoid significant
adverse impacts to water quality.
SMPP71 Shorelines that are of unique or valuable natural character
should be considered for public acquisition. Subsequent
Page 21 of 52
SMP - 19
management of such areas should protect or enhance
shoreline ecological functions.
SMPP72 Protection and conservation of vegetation within shoreline
areas should be managed through implementation of setback,
clearing and grading, and mitigation standards for
development activity.
SMPP73 Resource conservation should be an integral part of shoreline
planning. All future shoreline development should be
planned, designed, and sited to minimize adverse impact
upon the natural shoreline environment and ecological
functions.
SMPP74 Scenic and aesthetic qualities and ecological functions of
shorelines should be recognized and preserved as valuable
resources.
a. When appropriate, natural flora and fauna should be
preserved.
b. In shoreline areas, the natural topography should not be
substantially altered.
c. Shoreline structures should be sited and designed to
minimize view obstruction and should be visually
compatible with the shoreline character.
d. Wildlife and aquatic habitats, including spawning
grounds, should be protected.
SMPP75 Resources should be managed to enhance the environment
and prevent a net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
a. Shoreline in-water and over-water activities and
development should be planned, constructed, and
operated to minimize adverse effects on the natural
processes of the shoreline, and should maintain or
enhance the quality of air, soil, natural vegetation, and
water on the shoreline.
b. Use or activity which substantially degrades the natural
resources or ecological functions of the shoreline should
not be allowed without mitigation as required by SMP
regulations and FWRC Title 14, “Environmental
Policy.”
SMPP76 Critical salmonid habitats, including saltwater and freshwater
habitat used by Pacific salmonid species, support valuable
recreational and commercial fisheries and should be protected
for their importance to the aquatic ecosystem, as well as state
and local economies.
a. Non-water-dependent and non-water-related uses,
Page 22 of 52
SMP - 20
activities, structures, and landfills should not be located
in critical salmonid habitats.
b. Where uses, activities, structures, and landfills must locate
in critical salmonid habitats, impacts on these areas should
be lessened to the maximum extent possible. Significant
unavoidable impacts should be mitigated by creating in-
kind replacement habitat near the project where feasible.
Where in-kind replacement mitigation is not feasible,
rehabilitation of out-of-kind or off-site degraded habitat
should be required. Mitigation proposals should be
developed in consultation with the City, the State
Department of Fish and Wildlife, and any affected Indian
Nations.
c. Development that is outside critical salmonid habitats
that has the potential to significantly affect said habitats
should be located and designed as to not create
significant negative impacts to said habitats.
d. Whenever feasible, bioengineering should be used as the
bank protection technique for all streams considered to
have critical salmonid habitat.
e. Whenever feasible, open pile bridges should be used for
all water crossings over areas considered critical
salmonid habitat.
f. Impervious surfaces should be minimized in upland
developments to reduce stormwater runoff peaks.
Structures and uses creating significant impervious
surfaces should include stormwater detention systems to
reduce stormwater runoff peaks.
g. The discharge of silt and sediments into waterways shall
be minimized during in-water and upland construction.
h. Adopt-A-Stream programs and similar efforts to
rehabilitate critical salmonid habitats should be
encouraged.
i. Fishery enhancement projects should be encouraged
where they will not significantly interfere with other
beneficial uses.
j. Project proponents should contact the Habitat Division
of the State Department of Fish and Wildlife and
affected Indian Nations early in the development process
to determine if the proposal will occur in or adjacent to
critical salmonid habitat.
k. When reviewing permits for uses, activities, and
structures proposed in, over, or adjacent to marine
waters, streams, wetlands, ponds connected to streams,
or any other shoreline area, City staff should contact the
Habitat Division of the State Department of Fish and
Wildlife to determine if the proposal will occur in or
affect any adjacent critical habitats. Staff should also
contact affected Indian Nations.
Page 23 of 52
SMP - 21
SMPP77 Use the City’s established permit tracking program to
periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the SMP for
achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological functions with
respect to shoreline permitting and exemptions. Prepare an
evaluation report every seven years when the SMP is required
to be updated under RCW 90.58.080(4).
SMPP78 Continue work with the State, King County, Watershed
Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9 Steering Committee,
and other governmental and non-governmental organizations
to explore how local governments can contribute to the
preservation and restoration of ecological processes and
shoreline functions.
SMPP79 Continue work with the WRIA 9 forum to restore shoreline
habitats and seasonal ranges that support listed endangered
and threatened species, as well as other anadromous
fisheries.
SMPP80 Prioritize enhancement and restoration efforts at public parks
and open space lands.
SMPP81 Work with owners of other publicly-owned land, such as
Washington State Parks, to encourage restoration and
enhancement projects, including funding strategies.
SMPP82 Work with the public and other interested parties to prioritize
restoration opportunities identified in Shoreline Inventory
and Characterization Report and SMP Restoration Plan.
SMPP83 Promote vegetation restoration, and the control of invasive
weeds and nonnative species to avoid adverse impacts to
hydrology, and to reduce the hazard of slope failures or
accelerated erosion.
SMPP84 Develop a program to implement restoration projects,
including funding strategies.
SMPP85 Monitor and adaptively manage restoration projects.
SMPP86 Create incentives that will make it economically or
otherwise attractive for development proposals to integrate
shoreline ecological restoration into development projects.
SMPP87 Encourage protection, enhancement, or restoration of native
riparian vegetation through incentives and non-regulatory
programs.
SMPP88 Promote bioengineering and/or soft engineering alternative
design approaches to shoreline stabilization and provide
Page 24 of 52
SMP - 22
technical guidance to shoreline landowners.
SMPP89 Establish public education materials to provide shoreline
landowners technical assistance about the benefits of native
vegetation plantings.
SMPP90 Explore opportunities with other educational organizations
and agencies to develop an on-going program of shoreline
education for all ages.
SMPP91 Identify areas where kiosks and interpretative signs can
enhance the educational experience of users of the shoreline.
SMPP92 Develop strategies to fund identified educational and
interpretive projects.
SMPP93 Manage cultural and historic resources in the shoreline
consistent with city-wide policies for treatment of such
resources in the FWCP.
SMPP94 Recognize that shoreline areas are of moderate to high
probability for archaeological resources and require
appropriate review and site investigation for proposed
development or modifications.
SMPP95 New surface transportation development should be designed
to provide the best possible service with the least possible
infringement upon shoreline areas.
a. New transportation facilities and improvements to
existing facilities that substantially increase levels of air,
noise, odor, visual, or water pollution should be
discouraged, unless benefits of the facility outweigh
costs.
b. Transportation corridors should be designed to
harmonize with the topography and other natural
characteristics of the shoreline through which they
traverse.
c. New surface transportation facilities in shoreline areas
should be set back from the ordinary high water mark far
enough to make unnecessary such protective measures as
rip-rap or other bank stabilization, landfill, bulkheads,
groins, jetties, or substantial site regrade.
d. New transportation facilities crossing lakes, streams,
wetlands, or other critical areas should be encouraged to
locate in existing corridors, except where any adverse
impact can be minimized by selecting an alternate
corridor.
e. Shoreline circulation systems should be adaptable to
changes in technology.
Page 25 of 52
SMP - 23
SMPP96 Circulation systems should be located and attractively
designed so as not to unnecessarily or unreasonably pollute
the physical environment, or reduce the benefits people
derive from their property.
a. Motorized vehicular traffic on beaches and other natural
shoreline areas shall be prohibited.
b. Transportation facilities providing access to shoreline
developments should be planned and designed in scale
and character with the use proposed.
c. New transportation facilities should minimize total
impervious surface area by generally being oriented
perpendicular to the shoreline where topographic
conditions will allow.
SMPP97 Circulation systems should be designed to enhance aesthetic
experiences through creating shoreline vista and access
points and encouraging alternative modes of transportation.
SMPP98 New transportation developments in shoreline areas should
provide turnout areas for scenic stops and off road rest areas
where the topography, view, and natural features warrant,
consistent with the public access and recreation policies.
SMPP99 Shoreline roadway corridors with unique or historic
significance, or of great aesthetic quality, should be retained
and maintained for those characteristics.
SMPP100 Shoreline circulation routes should provide for non-
motorized means of travel and should incorporate
multimodal provisions where public safety can be assured.
SMPP101 The existing system of pedestrian ways, bikeways, and
equestrian ways in the City should be extended to provide
safe access to public parks located on the shoreline.
SMPP102 Shoreline roadways should have a high priority for arterial
beautification funds.
SMPP103 Regionally significant pedestrian and bicycle facilities and
amenities along shoreline circulation routes should be
pursued in partnership with other agencies.
SMPP104 Pedestrian access should be built where access to public
shorelines is desirable and has been cut off by linear
transportation corridors. New linear facilities should enable
pedestrian access to public shorelines where access is
desirable.
SMPP105 Transportation and utility facilities should be encouraged to
Page 26 of 52
SMP - 24
coordinate joint use of rights-of-way and to consolidate
crossings of water bodies when doing so can minimize
adverse impact to the shoreline.
10.5 MAPS
The Shoreline Master Program Map (Map SMP-1) graphically displays the
portions of the city and its Potential annexation Areas that are covered by
the provisions of this Chapter. The Poverty Bay Shellfish Protection
District Map is Map SMP-2.
Page 27 of 52
SMP - 25
Map SMP-1
Page 28 of 52
SMP - 1
CHAPTER TEN – SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM
5 May 2022
Goals
SMPG1 Shoreline areas shall permit a variety of development types
in accordance with the FWRC, FWCP, and Shoreline Master
Plan designations. Designs, densities, and locations for all
allowed uses and developments should shall consider
physical and natural features of the shoreline and prevent a
net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Goal.
SMPG2 Residential use of shoreline areas should shall be continued
and encouraged in areas that have not been designated as
Natural environments by the SMP, allowing a variety of
housing types. New development or redevelopment of
residential uses should cause result in no net loss of
shoreline ecological function, as identified in the SMP’s
Shoreline Inventory Characterization and Analysis.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Goal.
SMPG3 Shoreline areas designated by the FWCP and the SMP to
allow for commercial development shall permit a variety of
commercial and office park development types. New
development or expansion of existing commercial and office
uses should result in no net loss of shoreline ecological
functions.
Same as SMPG1
SMPG4 Regional and sub-regional utility facilities, including
communications, (radio, TV, and telephone), energy
distribution (petroleum products, natural gas, and
electricity), water, sanitary sewers, and storm sewers should
not be allowed in shoreline areas unless there is no
alternative location. Design, location, construction, and
maintenance of utility facilities must comply with the
requirements of SMP regulationsTitle 15 FWRC and other
federal, state, and local laws, and result in no net loss of
shoreline ecological functions.
Clarity – SMP regulations are Title 15.
SMPG5 Limit shoreline stabilization—which includes any action
Page 29 of 52
SMP - 2
taken to reduce adverse impacts caused by current, flood,
wake, or wave action—including the use of bank
stabilization, rip rap, and bulk heading, to that which is
necessary to protect existing improvements.
This Goal is broader reaching by deleting the finite list. An alternative
edit could include the words “such as” inserted before “includes”
SMPG6 Docks and moorages should be allowed when associated
with residential, recreational, or other public facilities. The
design, location, and construction of any dock, pier, or
moorage shallould avoid, to the greatest extent possible,
adverse effects on shoreline ecological functions.
The first sentence is not needed. Clarity – “should” to “shall”
SMPG7 Increase public access to and enjoyment of shoreline areas
through improvements to physical access on publicly- owned
lands and improved visual access, provided that private
rights, public safety, and shoreline ecological functions
remain intact.
No changes.
SMPG8 Provide additional shoreline- dependent and water- oriented
recreational opportunities that are diverse, convenient, and
adequate for the regional population, and that will not result
in a net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
Grammar.
SMPG9 Recreational experiences that depend on, or utilize, the
shoreline (including: harvesting activities of fish, shellfish,
fowl, minerals, and driftwood; various forms of boating,
swimming, and utilization of shoreline pathways; and
watching or recording activities, such as photography,
painting, or the viewing of water -dependent activities) shall
be encouraged within parks and other public access areas,
given they do not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological
functions and are allowed uses under state and local
regulations.
Grammar.
SMPG10 Preserve and protect the ecological functions of intact
natural shorelines and ecologically sensitive shorelines as
outlined within the shoreline inventory and characterization.
No changes.
Page 30 of 52
SMP - 3
SMPG11 Assure preservation of unique and non-renewable natural
resources and assure conservation of renewable natural
resources for the benefit of existing and future generations
and the public interest.
This Goal should not be limited to those non-renewable resources that
are considered “unique” – if they are non-renewable, they should be
preserved.
SMPG12 Develop regional solutions with other jurisdictions, tribes,
and interested parties to resolve the challenge of protecting
shoreline ecological functions, while also managing
shoreline developments.
No changes.
SMPG13 Pursue projects to restore and enhance shoreline habitats
and processes on publicly -owned lands.
Grammar.
SMPG14 Encourage voluntary restoration projects on private
property in degraded shoreline environments.
No changes.
SMPG15 Provide ample opportunitiesy for the public to learn about
the ecological aspects and community values of the City’s
shorelines.
“ample” adds a level of vagueness and the Goal reads clearer w/o it.
SMPG16 Identify, protect, preserve, and restore important
archaeological, historical, and cultural sites located in or
associated with Federal Way’s shorelines for scientific and
educational purposes.
This Goal should not be limited.
SMPG17 Circulation systems in shoreline areas should be limited to
those that are shoreline dependent or would serve shoreline
dependent uses,; or, those that must pass through shoreline
areas. The environment shall be protected from any
significant adverse effects of circulation systems required in
shoreline areas.
2nd sentence is covered by Goal 1 as “development” includes “circulation
systems”
Policies
Page 31 of 52
SMP - 4
SMPP1 Shoreline land and water areas particularly suited for specific
and appropriate uses should shall be designated and reserved
for such uses.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP2 Shoreline land and water uses should satisfy the economic,
social, and physical needs of the regional population, but
should shall not lead to a net loss of ecological functions in
the shoreline areas.
Since all uses are either land or water, they do not need to be listed.
SMPP3 Like or compatible shoreline uses should be clustered or
distributed in a rational manner, rather than allowed to
develop haphazardly.
The policy says “clustered or distributed” – seems to be conflicting.
Also, “haphazardly” is undefined and unclear.
SMPP4 Multiple uses of shoreline should be encouraged where
location and integration of compatible uses or activities are
feasible.
No changes.
SMPP5 Shoreline ecological functions shouldall be protected from
uses or activities that will have an adverse effect on them.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP6 Non-residential uses or activities that are not shoreline
dependent should be encouraged to located or relocated
away from the shoreline.
Clarity: removing “encouraged” clarifies the City’s commitment to the
Policy.
SMPP7 Federal Way shallould consider the goals, objectives, and
policies of the SMP in all land use management decisions
regarding the use or development of adjacent uplands where
such use or development may have an adverse effect on
designated shorelines.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy; and, the City’s Comprehensive Plan does not include
Page 32 of 52
SMP - 5
objectives.
SMPP8 Development shouldall be regulated accordingly in shoreline
areas known to contain development hazards or which would
adversely impact designated critical areas as identified in
FWRC Title 15.
a. All development shouldall be prohibited within the 100-
year floodplain, except single-family residential and water-
dependent or water-related uses.
b. All development shouldall be prohibited in shoreline
areas of severe or very severe landslide hazard.
c. All development should be regulated in shoreline areas
with slopes of 40 percent or greater.
d.c. Shoreline areas containing other potential hazards (e.g.,
geological conditions, unstable subsurface conditions,
erosion hazards, steep slopes, or groundwater or seepage
problems) should be regulated as necessary to avoid
unsafe development and disturbance of sensitive areas.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy. For “c”, slopes of 40% or greater are regulated as Critical
Area steep sloped and this part of the policy adds no greater direction.
“Steep slopes” has also been added to the list in new “c”.
SMPP9 Promote respect of private property rights while
implementing SMA requirements.
This policy is unclear – recommend deletion.
SMPP10 Residential developments shouldall be designed to achieve
no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and minimize
interference with visual and physical access. Unavoidable
impacts to the shoreline environment from residential
development shouldall be mitigated to assure no net loss of
shoreline ecological functions.
a. Residential development in designated critical areas or
their associated buffers should shall be regulated as
required by the City’s SMP regulations.
b. Residential development on piers or over water is
prohibited.
c. Landfill for residential development that reduces water
surface or floodplain capacity shall not be permitted.
d. In residential developments, the water’s edge shouldall
be kept free of buildings and fences.
e. Development standards shouldall require the retention of
natural shoreline vegetation and other natural features of
the landscape to the greatest extent possible during site
Page 33 of 52
SMP - 6
development and construction.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy. For c, cannot both reduce water surface and floodplain
capacity.
SMPP11 Residential use of shorelines should shall not displace or
encroach upon areas that have existing or are designated as
supporting water-dependent shoreline uses.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP12 Residential densities should will be determined with regard
for the physical capabilities of the shoreline areas and public
services requirements and include the following
considerations:
a. Subdivisions and new development should shall be
designed to adequately protect aesthetic characteristics
of the water and shoreline environment.
b. New residential development should shall only be
allowed in those shoreline areas where the provision for
sewage disposal and drainage ways are of such a
standard that adjoining water bodies would not be
adversely affected by pollution or siltation.
c. Residential development along shorelines should shall
be setback from the ordinary high water mark far enough
to make unnecessary such protective measures as filling,
bulk heading, construction groins, or jetties, or
substantial re-grading of the site.
d. Residential developments should shall be designed to
enhance the appearance of the shoreline and not
substantially interfere with the views from public
property or access to the water.
e. The shoreline ecosystems, processes, and functions
identified in the Shoreline Inventory and
Characterization should shall be considered when
determining standards for residential development
patterns within the shoreline environment.
Clarity: replacing the “should(s)” clarifies the City’s commitment to the
Policy.
SMPP13 Residential subdivisions in shoreline areas should provide
public pedestrian access to the shorelines within the
development in accordance with the public access and
recreation element of this master program.
Covered by SMPP15
Page 34 of 52
SMP - 7
SMPP14 Developers of recreational projects such as summer homes,
cabins, campgrounds, and similar facilities should shall
satisfactorily demonstrate:
a. The suitability of the site to accommodate the proposed
development without adversely affecting the shoreline
environment and water resources.
b. Adequate provisions for all necessary utilities, including
refuse disposal.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy. Also, “cabins” & “summer homes” are not different than
residential.
SMPP15 Consideration should shall be made of the effect a structure
will have on scenic value, and when feasible, should include
opportunities for public access to shoreline areas.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP16 Commercial and office structures and ancillary facilities that
are not shoreline dependent or water-oriented should shall be
setback from the water’s edge and designed to avoid adverse
impacts to shoreline ecological functions.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP17 The use of porous materials and other low impact
development design alternatives should beare encouraged for
paved areas to allow water to penetrate and percolate into the
soil. Use of holding systems should beare encouraged to
control the runoff rate from parking lots and rooftops.
Clarity: changing “should” clarifies the City’s commitment to the Policy.
SMPP18 Commercial and office development located within shoreline
areas should shall be constructed to withstand normal rain
and flooding conditions without contributing pollution to the
watercourse or shoreline. State and local best management
practices should shall be implemented to protect the natural
shoreline environment from impacts associated with
stormwater runoff.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP19 Commercial and office development that is not water-
Page 35 of 52
SMP - 8
dependent should shall provide a buffer zone of native
vegetation for erosion control.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP20 Commercial aquaculture activities should shall be
prohibited.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP21 Utilities that could allow for growth should shall not be
extended into or along shorelines without prior approval of
such extension by the appropriate land use authority.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP22 Utilities located in shoreline environments inappropriate for
development should not make service available to those
areas.
If the utilities are inappropriate for development, then they cannot be
made available to development.
SMPP23 In developed shorelines not served by utilities, utility
construction should be encouraged toshall be located where
it can be shown that water quality will be maintained or
improved.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP24 Federal Way should be consulted prior to, or at the time of,
application for construction of regional utility facilities to be
located in or along shorelines.
If a City permit is required, the City will be contacted. If no local permit
is required, what benefit does this policy offer?
SMPP25 Utility corridors crossing shorelines shallould be encouraged
to consolidate and concentrate or share rights-of-way where:
a. Public access or view corridors would be improved.
b. Concentration or sharing would not hinder the ability of
the utility systems to be installed, operated, or
maintained safely.
c. Water quality would be as good as or better than if
separate corridors were present.
Page 36 of 52
SMP - 9
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP26 Public access should beis encouraged where rights-of-way
for regional utility facilities cross shorelines in the City, and
where public safety and facility security would not be
compromised.
Clarity: changing “should” clarifies the City’s commitment to the Policy.
SMPP27 New utility facilities shallould be located so as to not require
extensive shoreline protection nor to restrict water flow,
circulation, or navigation; .
SMPP28 New utility facilities and rights-of-way should be located to
preserve the natural landscape and minimize conflicts with
present and planned uses of the land on which they are
located.; and, shall
SMPP29 New utility facilities and rights-of-way should be located
and designed to minimize detrimental visual impacts from
the water and adjacent uplands.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy. SMPP 28 & 29 have been collapsed into 27.
SMPP30 New freestanding personal wireless service facilities are
prohibited from locating within the shoreline environment.
City cannot prohibit if Wireless carrier demonstrates a need.
SMPP31 Shoreline stabilization should shall be allowed only if it is
clearly demonstrated that shoreline protection is necessary to
protect existing improvements.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP32 Structural solutions to reduce shoreline erosion should shall
be allowed only after it is demonstrated that nonstructural
solutions, such as bioengineering or soft-shore armoring,
would not be able to protect existing development.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP33 Planning of shoreline stabilization shallould encompass
sizable stretches of lake or marine shorelines. This planning
should consider off-site erosion, accretion, or flood damage
Page 37 of 52
SMP - 10
that might occur as a result of shoreline protection structures
or activities.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy & the deleted language removed ambiguous language.
SMPP34 Shoreline stabilization on marine and lake shorelines should
shall not be used as a means of creating new or newly
developable land.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP35 Shoreline stabilization structures should shall allow passage
of ground and surface waters into the main water body.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP36 Shoreline stabilization should not reduce the volume and
storage capacity of streams and adjacent wetlands or flood
plains.
No change.
SMPP37 Whenever shoreline stabilization is needed, bioengineered
alternatives such as natural berms and erosion control
vegetation plans should be favored over hard surfaced
structural alternatives such as concrete bulkheads and sheet
piles.
Same intent as SMPP32
SMPP38 The burden of proof for the need for shoreline stabilization
to protect existing developments or proposed
redevelopments rests on the applicant.
No changes.
SMPP39 Shoreline stabilization activities that may necessitate new or
increased shoreline protection on the same or other affected
properties where there has been no previous need for
protection should not be allowed.
SMPP39 seems to conflict with SMPP38. Suggest deletion.
SMPP40 New development shall be designed and located so as not to
require shoreline stabilization.
No changes.
Page 38 of 52
SMP - 11
SMPP41 Areas of significance in the spawning, nesting, rearing, or
residency of aquatic and terrestrial biota should shall be
given special consideration in review of proposed shoreline
stabilization activities.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP42 Shoreline stabilization activities shallould be discouraged in
areas where they would disrupt natural feeder bluffs
processes, important for maintaining beaches.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP43 Open pile construction should shall be preferred where there
is significant littoral drift, where scenic values will not be
impaired, and where minimal alteration to the shoreline and
minimal damage to aquatic resources can be assured.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP44 Piers, floats, and docks should shall be prohibited or limited
or permitted as a conditional use where conflicts with
recreational boaters and other recreational water activities
would create public safety hazards.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy; and, the City does not have a Conditional Use process.
SMPP45 Where new docks are allowed, new residential development
of two or more dwellings should shall be required to provide
joint use or community dock facilities, when feasible, rather
than allow individual docks for each residence.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP46 Temporary moorages should may be permitted for vessels
used in the construction of shoreline facilities. The design
and construction of such moorages shall be such that upon
termination of the project, aquatic habitat can be returned to
original condition within one year at no cost to the
environment or the public.
Clarity: changing “should” clarifies the City’s commitment to the Policy.
SMPP47 Shoreline structures that are abandoned or structurally unsafe
Page 39 of 52
SMP - 12
should shall be removed.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP48 Docks, buoys, and other moorages should shall only be
authorized after consideration of:
a. The effect such structures have on wildlife and aquatic
life, water quality, unique and fragile areas, submerged
lands, and shoreline vegetation.
b. The effect such structures have on navigation,
recreational and commercial boating, shoreline access,
and scenic and aesthetic values.
c. The effect such structures have on water circulation,
sediment movement, and littoral drift.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP49 Moorage buoys should beare preferred over moorage piles
on all tidal waters.
Clarity: changing “should” to “are” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP50 Development of public access should shall respect and
protect private rights that are held on shoreline property.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP51 Public access should shall be maintained and regulated.
a. Public access should be policed and improved consistent
with intensity of use.
b. Provisions to restrict access as to nature, time, number of
people, and area may be appropriate for public
pedestrian easements and other public access areas
where there are spawning grounds, fragile aquatic life
habitats, or potential hazards for pedestrian safety.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP52 Design of access should shall provide for the public health,
safety,
and enjoyment.
a. Appropriate signs should shall be used to designate
Page 40 of 52
SMP - 13
publicly-accessible owned shorelines.
b. Pedestrian and non-motorized physical and visual access
to the shoreline should beis encouraged.
c. Public access to and along the water’s edge should shall
be made available in publicly- owned shorelines in a
manner that protects shoreline ecological functions.
Clarity: changing “should” clarifies the City’s commitment to the Policy;
and, changed “owned” to “accessible” as some of these accessways
might be public easements on private property.
SMPP53 Acquisition and development of new shoreline public access
locations should shall be consistent with overall parks and
open space planning goals and policies.
a. Acquisition and development of shoreline properties
should shall be consistent with criteria and standards as
part of an overall park and open space master plan.
b. Where appropriate, utility and transportation rights-of-
way on the shoreline should shall be made available for
public access and use, consistent with the shoreline use
and circulation element policies.
c. Where appropriate, publicly-owned street ends that abut
the shoreline should shall be retained and/or reclaimed
for public access, consistent with the circulation
elementTransportation Chapter policies.
d. Shoreline recreational facilities and other public access
points should shall be connected by trails, bicycle
pathways, and other access links where possible.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy. Changed “circulation element” to “Transportation Chapter”
SMPP54 To the extent possible, pPublic access shouldall be provided
in new shoreline developments.
a. Incentives should be used to encourage private property
owners to provide public shoreline access.
b. Public pedestrian easements should be considered in
future land use authorizations, and in the case of projects
along lakes, streams, ponds, and marine lands, whenever
shoreline features are appropriate for public use.
Shorelines of the City characterized by the following
should be considered for pedestrian easements:
1. Areas of significant, historical, geological, and/or
biological features and landmarks.
2. Areas presently being legally used, or historically
having been legally used, by the public along the
shoreline for access.
Page 41 of 52
SMP - 14
3. Where public funds have been expended on or
related to shoreline developments.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy, but the qualifier was added at the beginning to reflect the fact
that in some cases public access will not be able to be obtained.
SMPP55 Shorelines in the City should be available to all people for
passive use, visual access, and enjoyment.
a. The City should preserve and provide publicly
accessible viewpoints, lookouts, and vistas of shorelines.
b. New developments should minimize visual and physical
obstruction of the water from adjacent roads and public
properties.
Cannot achieve this everywhere. Other policies cover the intent of this
policy.
SMPP56 Physical and/or visual access to the water should use steep
slopes, view points from bluffs, stream valleys, and features
of special interest where it is possible to place pathways
consistent with public safety and without requiring extensive
flood or erosion protection.
No changes.
SMPP57 Areas containing special shoreline recreation qualities not
easily duplicated should be made available for public use
and enjoyment.
a. Opportunities should shall be provided for the public to
understand natural shoreline processes and experience
natural resource features.
b. Public viewing and interpretation should shall be
encouraged at or near governmental shoreline facilities
when consistent with security and public safety.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP58 Shoreline recreational use and development should shall
enhance environmental quality with minimal adverse effect
to natural resources.
a. Stretches of relatively inaccessible and unspoiled
shoreline should be available and designated as low
intensity or passive recreational use areas with minimal
development. Service facilities such as footpaths,
periphery parking, and adequate sanitary facilities should
Page 42 of 52
SMP - 15
only be located where appropriate, considering both
public safety and preservation of shoreline ecological
functions.
b. Beaches and other predominantly undeveloped
shorelines currently utilized for recreational purposes
should be available and designated as medium intensity
recreational use areas to be free from expansive
development; intensity of use should respect and protect
the natural qualities of the area.
c. Small or linear portions of the shoreline suitable for
recreational purposes should be available and designated
as transitional use areas that allow for variable intensities
of use, which may include vista points, pedestrian
walkways, water entry points, and access from the water;
utilizing stream floodplains, street ends, steep slopes,
and shoreline areas adjacent to waterfront roads.
d. At suitable locations, shorelines should be made
available and designated as high intensive use areas that
provide for a wide variety of recreational activities.
e. Overall design and development in shoreline recreational
areas should be sensitive to the physical site
characteristics and be consistent with the level of use in
the area concerned.
f. Recreation areas and ancillary facilities on or adjacent to
the shoreline should have adequate surveillance and
maintenance.
g. Non-water oriented recreational facility development
should be setback from the water’s edge, except where
appropriate in high intensive shoreline use areas.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP59 The provision of adequate public shoreline recreation lands
should shall be based on an acquisition plan that is consistent
with overall goals for enhancing public access to the City’s
shorelines.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP60 Existing buildings that enhance the character of the shoreline
should be incorporated into recreation areas wherever
possible.
No changes.
SMPP61 A balanced variety of recreational opportunities should shall
be provided for people of different ages, health, family
status, and financial ability.
Page 43 of 52
SMP - 16
a. Shoreline recreation areas should shall provide
opportunities for different use intensities ranging from
low (solitude) to high (many people).
b. Opportunities for shoreline recreational experiences
should include developing access that accommodates a
range of differences in people’s physical mobility,
capabilities, and skill levels.
c. Recreational development should meet the demands of
population growth consistent with the carrying capacity
of the land and water resources.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy. The changes to “b” were intended as clarifications only.
SMPP62 Underwater parks should be extensions of shoreline parks,
and whenever possible, be created or enhanced by artificial
reefs where natural conditions or aquatic life could be
observed with minimal interference.
No changes.
SMPP63 During storm events, hazardous conditions, or emergencies,
temporary use of public recreational shoreline areas by
boaters should be allowed.
No changes.
SMPP64 Prime fishing areas should be given priority for recreational
use.
No changes.
SMPP65 Recreational shellfish harvesting should shall be allowed on
public beaches subject to rules, regulations, and periodic
closures by Washington Department of Health and/or
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP66 Boating activities that increase shore erosion should shall be
discouraged.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP67 Effective interpretationInformational signage should be
provided to raise the quality of visitor experiences and
provide an understanding of aquatic and shoreline resource.
Page 44 of 52
SMP - 17
Clarification – better word choices.
SMPP68 Manage designated critical areas in the shoreline—such as
critical aquifer recharge areas and wellhead protection areas,
frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas,
regulated wetlands, and streams—according to measures
provided in this SMP. These includinge shoreline
environment designations, allowed uses, development
standards and regulations, buffers, and mitigation for
unavoidable impacts. They should also be consistent with the
policies contained in FWCP Chapter 9, “Natural
Environment.”
The list may be limiting the intent of this Policy and the Policy is
stronger without it. The reference to Chapter 9 is not necessary.
SMPP69 Develop standards, buffers, and mitigation requirements for
designated critical areas in the shoreline consistent with city-
wide regulations.
Included in SMPP68.
SMPP70 All new development and activity in or adjacent to shoreline
areas should shall be designed, constructed, and operated as
to avoid significant adverse impacts to ground or surface
water quality. Use of state and local best management
practices and guidance should be implemented to avoid
significant adverseminimize impacts to water quality and
ecological functions.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy and other edits are intended to improve clarity.
SMPP71 Shorelines that are of unique or valuable natural character
should be considered for public acquisition. Subsequent
management of such areas should protect or enhance
shoreline ecological functions.
Clarification.
SMPP72 Protection and conservation of vegetation within shoreline
areas should shall be managed through implementation of
setback, clearing and grading, and mitigation standards for
development activity.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP73 Resource conservation should be an integral part of shoreline
Page 45 of 52
SMP - 18
planning. All future shoreline development should be
planned, designed, and sited to minimize adverse impact
upon the natural shoreline environment and ecological
functions.
Covered by SMPP70.
SMPP74 Scenic and aesthetic qualities and ecological functions of
shorelines should shall be recognized and preserved as
valuable resources.
a. When appropriate, natural flora and fauna should shall
be preserved.
b. In shoreline areas, the natural topography should shall
not be substantially altered.
c. Shoreline structures should shall be sited and designed to
minimize view obstruction and should be visually
compatible with the shoreline character.
d. Wildlife and aquatic habitats, including spawning
grounds, should shall be protected.
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy.
SMPP75 Resources should shall be managed to enhance the
environment and prevent a net loss of shoreline ecological
functions.
a. Shoreline in-water and over-water activities and
development should shall be planned, constructed, and
operated to minimize adverse effects on the natural
processes of the shoreline, and should will maintain or
enhance the quality of air, soil, natural vegetation, and
water on the shoreline.
b. Use or activity which substantially degrades the natural
resources or ecological functions of the shoreline should
shall not be allowed without mitigation. as required by
SMP regulations and FWRC Title 14, “Environmental
Policy.”
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy and reference to Title 14 is not necessary.
SMPP76 Critical salmonid habitats, including saltwater and freshwater
habitat used by Pacific salmonid species, support valuable
recreational and commercial fisheries and should shall be
protected for their importance to the aquatic ecosystem, as
well as state and local economies.
a. Non-water-dependent and non-water-related uses,
Page 46 of 52
SMP - 19
activities, structures, and landfills should not be located
in critical salmonid habitats.
b. Where uses, activities, structures, and landfills must locate
in critical salmonid habitats, impacts on these areas should
be lessened to the maximum extent possible minimized.
Significant unavoidable impacts should be mitigated by
creating in-kind replacement habitat near the project where
feasible. Where in-kind replacement mitigation is not
feasible, rehabilitation of out-of-kind or off-site degraded
habitat should be required. Mitigation proposals should be
developed in consultation with the City, the State
Department of Fish and Wildlife, and any affected Indian
Nations.
c. Development that is outside critical salmonid habitats
that has the potential to significantly affect said habitats
should shall be located and designed as to not create
significant negative impacts to said habitats.
d. Whenever feasible, bioengineering should shall be used
as the bank protection technique for all streams
considered to have critical salmonid habitat.
e. Whenever feasible, open pile bridges should shall be
used for all water crossings over areas considered critical
salmonid habitat.
f. Minimize iImpervious surfaces should be minimized in
upland developments to reduce stormwater runoff peaks.
Structures and uses creating significant impervious
surfaces should shall include stormwater detention
systems to reduce stormwater runoff peaks.
g. The discharge of silt and sediments into waterways shall
be minimized during in-water and upland construction.
h. Adopt-A-Stream programs and similar efforts to
rehabilitate critical salmonid habitats should shall be
encouraged.
i. Fishery enhancement projects should shall be
encouraged where they will not significantly interfere
with other beneficial uses.
j. Project proponents should will be encouraged to contact
the Habitat Division of the State Department of Fish and
Wildlife and affected Indian Nations early in the
development process to determine if the proposal will
occur in or adjacent to critical salmonid habitat.
k. When reviewing permits for uses, activities, and
structures proposed in, over, or adjacent to marine
waters, streams, wetlands, ponds connected to streams,
or any other shoreline area, City staff should contact the
Habitat Division of the State Department of Fish and
Wildlife to determine if the proposal will occur in or
affect any adjacent critical habitats. Staff should also
contact affected Indian Nations.
Page 47 of 52
SMP - 20
Clarity: changing “should” to “shall” clarifies the City’s commitment to
the Policy. Additional proposed edits are aimed at improving clarity.
SMPP77 Use the City’s established permit tracking program to
periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the SMP for
achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological functions with
respect to shoreline permitting and exemptions. Prepare an
evaluation report every seven years when the SMP is required
to be updated under RCW 90.58.080(4).
The City’s Permit Tracking program does not provide this function. By
RCW, a report is due to DOE by 6/29/27.
SMPP78 Continue work with the State, King County, Watershed
Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9 and 10 Steering
Committee, and other governmental and non-governmental
organizations to explore how local governments can
contribute to the preservation and restoration of ecological
processes and shoreline functions.
Modified to recognize that part of the City is covered by WRIA 10.
SMPP79 Continue work with the WRIA 9 and 10 forum to restore
shoreline habitats and seasonal ranges that support listed
endangered and threatened species, as well as other
anadromous fisheries.
Modified to recognize that part of the City is covered by WRIA 10.
SMPP80 Prioritize enhancement and restoration efforts at public parks
and open space lands.
No changes.
SMPP81 Work with owners of other publicly-owned land, such as
Washington State Parks, to encourage restoration and
enhancement projects, including funding strategies.
No changes.
SMPP82 Work with the public and other interested parties to prioritize
restoration opportunities identified in Shoreline Inventory
and Characterization Report and SMP Restoration Plan.
No changes.
SMPP83 Promote vegetation restoration, and the control of invasive
weeds and nonnative species to avoid adverse impacts to
hydrology, and to reduce the hazard of slope failures or
accelerated erosion.
Page 48 of 52
SMP - 21
No changes.
SMPP84 Develop a program to implement restoration projects,
including funding strategies.
No changes.
SMPP85 Monitor and adaptively manage restoration projects.
No changes.
SMPP86 Create incentives that will make it economically or
otherwise attractive for development proposals to integrate
shoreline ecological restoration into development projects.
No changes.
SMPP87 Encourage protection, enhancement, or restoration of native
riparian vegetation through incentives and non-regulatory
programs.
No changes.
SMPP88 Promote bioengineering and/or soft engineering alternative
design approaches to shoreline stabilization and provide
technical guidance to shoreline landowners.
No changes.
SMPP89 Establish public education materials to provide shoreline
landowners technical assistance about the benefits of native
vegetation plantings.
No changes.
SMPP90 Explore opportunities with other educational organizations
and agencies to develop an on-going program of shoreline
education for all ages.
Deleted unnecessary word.
SMPP91 Identify areas where kiosks and interpretative signs can
enhance the educational experience of users of the shoreline.
No changes.
SMPP92 Develop strategies to fund identified shoreline educational
and interpretive projects.
Page 49 of 52
SMP - 22
Edited to improve direction.
SMPP93 Manage cultural and historic resources in the shoreline
consistent with city-wide policies for treatment of such
resources in the FWCP.
No changes.
SMPP94 Recognize that shoreline areas are of moderate to high
probability for archaeological resources and require
appropriate review and site investigation for proposed
development or modifications.
No changes.
SMPP95 New surface transportation development facilities should be
designed to provide the best possible service with the least
possible infringement upon shoreline areas.
a. New transportation facilities and improvements to
existing facilities that substantially increase levels of air,
noise, odor, visual, or water pollution should be
discouraged, unless benefits of the facility outweigh
costs.
b. Transportation corridors should be designed to
harmonize with the topography and other natural
characteristics of the shoreline through which they
traverse.
c. New surface transportation facilities in shoreline areas
should shall be set back from the ordinary high water
mark far enough to make unnecessary such protective
measures as rip-rap or other bank stabilization, landfill,
bulkheads, groins, jetties, or substantial site regrade.
d. New transportation facilities crossing lakes, streams,
wetlands, or other critical areas should beare encouraged
to locate in existing corridors, except where any adverse
impact can be minimized by selecting an alternate
corridor.
e. Shoreline circulation systems should be adaptable to
changes in technology.
Proposed changes for clarity – “development” changed to “facilities” to
match language in subsections, “e” deleted -- this isn’t shoreline specific.
SMPP96 Circulation systems should be located and attractively
designed so as not to unnecessarily or unreasonably pollute
the physical environment, or reduce the benefits people
derive from their property.
a. Motorized vehicular traffic on beaches and other natural
shoreline areas shall be prohibited.
Page 50 of 52
SMP - 23
b. Transportation facilities providing access to shoreline
developments should be planned and designed in scale
and character with the use proposed.
c. New transportation facilities should minimize total
impervious surface area by generally being oriented
perpendicular to the shoreline where topographic
conditions will allow.
Covered by SMPP95.
SMPP97 Circulation systems should be designed to enhance aesthetic
experiences through creating shoreline vista and access
points and encouraging alternative modes of transportation.
No changes.
SMPP98 New transportation developments in shoreline areas should
provide turnout areas for scenic stops and off road rest areas
where the topography, view, and natural features warrant,
consistent with the public access and recreation policies.
Covered by SMPP97.
SMPP99 Shoreline roadway corridors with unique or historic
significance, or of great aesthetic quality, should be retained
and maintained for those characteristics.
No changes.
SMPP100 Shoreline circulation routes should provide for non-
motorized means of travel and should incorporate
multimodal provisions where public safety can be assured.
No changes.
SMPP101 The existing system of pedestrian ways, bikeways, and
equestrian ways in the City should be extended to provide
safe access to public parks located on the shoreline.
Covered by SMPP100.
SMPP102 Shoreline roadways should have a high priority for arterial
beautification funds.
Non-actionable.
SMPP103 Regionally significant pedestrian and bicycle facilities and
amenities along shoreline circulation routes should be
pursued in partnership with other agencies.
Page 51 of 52
SMP - 24
No changes.
SMPP104 Pedestrian access opportunities should be built where access to
public shorelines is desirable and has been cut off by linear
transportation corridors. New linear facilities should enable
pedestrian access to public shorelines where access is
desirable.
Seemed there was a missing word. 2nd sentence is unclear.
SMPP105 Encourage tTransportation and utility facilities should be
encouraged to coordinate joint use of rights-of-way and to
consolidate crossings of water bodies when doing so can
minimize adverse impact to the shoreline.
Put Action first and make language more definitive.
Page 52 of 52