Loading...
95-102612 CITY OF G Eo (206)661-4000 NNF11,1'. 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NO. : SEP95-0024 Description of Proposal: new 1800 sf. residence on a 4550 sf. lot abutting Steel Lake. Proponent: DORIS MESSIER Location: 30521 28TH AVE S Lead Agency: City of Federal Way The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, the "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist; Application No. SEP95-0024" for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to R.C.W. 43 . 21C. 060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under R.C.W. 43 . 21C. 032 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) ; the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. on 12/01/95. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City' s final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Contact Person: Bill Kingman Phone: 661-4000 Associate Planner Responsible Official: Gregory D. Moore, AICP Position/Title: Director of Community Development Services C Address: 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date issued: 11/16/95 Signature: �/fy� December 6, 1995 Mr. Bill Kingman City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way S. Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Proposed Steel Lake Residence PRE 95-0014 Dear Mr. Kingman, Julie Venn contacted me on November 9, 1995 in regards to the amount of fill for the driveway at our proposed residence. Reference: Environmental Check- list Section B.l.e. and B.3.a.3) . I indicated to her that you and I had dis- cussed the slope of the driveway in conjunction with the height of the house, and that only about half as much fill would be necessary. B.l.e. - Revised fill depth would be approximately two feet deep. B.3.a.3) - Revised fill volume would be approximately 19 cubic yards. Ms. Venn also suggested a turn-around on the lot. We will attempt to accom- odate a turn-around on the level of the lot as close to the house as possible. Enclosed are a new side elevation drawing and a site plan in regards to my discussion with you and Julie Venn. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincere R. Greg Otto Doris A. Messier P.O. Box 12003 Portland, OR 97212 (503) 287-3142 cc: Julie Venn CITY OF (206)661-4000 \) 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 December 8, 1995 David and Sue Marsh va\N-• 30527 - 28th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: SEP95-0024, Proposed New Residence Dear David and Sue: I am in receipt of your comment letter dated November 28, 1995, regarding the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) decision issued November 16, 1995, for a new residence at 30521 28th Avenue South, Federal Way. For reference, the comment period closed December 1, 1995, and the appeal period will close December 15, 1995. You will be notified by mail when the application is scheduled for a public hearing. The hearing is intended to provide the public opportunity to hear and comment on the application prior to a decision by the Hearing Examiner. Below are answers to issues raised in you letter. 1. You understand there is a minimum lot width of 40 feet and therefore, the development application for the subject 35 foot wide lot should be denied. The lot was created under the requirements of King County prior to February 28, 1990, the incorporation date of the City of Federal Way. As such, we are required to honor the creation of the subject lot regardless of its size and configuration. This requirement is based on a Federal Way City Code (FWCC) provision which states a lot is a legal building site if it was recorded in the King County Assessor's Office prior to February 28, 1990, and it has not been simultaneously owned by the owner of a contiguous lot subsequent to that date. This is the case with the subject lot. Therefore, the city has no ability to require the lot be widened to 40 feet. 2. You state the subject lot is smaller than the 4,550 square feet stated in the SEPA decision because a portion extends under the abutting Steel Lake. We concur. Approximately 2,503 square feet are below and 2,047 square feet are above Steel Lake. According to our maps, nearly every lot abutting Steel Lake extends under the lake. Please be advised that development requirements will be based on the portion of the lot above Steel Lake. No portion of the lot under Steel Lake may be used to meet development requirements. David and Sue Marsh December 8, 1995 Page 2 3. You are correct in stating the existing sewer line running through the subject lot restricts development opportunities. We have met twice with Lakehaven Utility District who verified that no sewer line easement encroachment will be supported. This decision is in contrast with previous Lakehaven Utility District decisions which allowed homes over the sewer line. It is this very issue which forces the property owner to request a shoreline setback variance in order to construct a home. 4. Traffic issues were examined with the SEPA review. The driveway is proposed to match the elevation of 28th Avenue South and decline to the first floor garage. Approximately 37 cubic yards of earth will be brought on the site for the driveway. This conceptual design meets all city design requirements and should not create a traffic hazard. Please be advised your that letter will be attached to the Hearing Examiner staff report as a SEPA decision comment letter. Thank you for providing written comments on the SEPA decision. Please call me at 661-411 if you have any questions. Respectfully, Bill Kingman, MCP Associate Planner SEP9524.L1 VED eeMMUNr YINVOL, a EP, r November 28, 1995 NOV 3 0 1995 Bill Kingman Dept. of Community Development 33530 1st Way So. re: proposed new residence at 30521 28th Ave. S. Application # SEP95-0024 I'm writing to express our concerns over the proposed new residence on the lot at 30521 28th Ave. S. It was our understanding that the minimum width building lot was 40 feet. The above lot is only 35 feet wide. Why is this even being considered as acceptable? Further, it is stated that the lot is 4550 SF. This may be true according to the plat map, but has anyone from the city actually visited the site to assess the real, practical boundaries? This lot extends only approximately 58 ft. from the roadside boundary to the edge of the lake - measured at less than high water level. This makes the usable area approximately 2030 SF. OVER HALF OF THIS LOT'S AREA IS UNDER WATER YEAR ROUND! Regardless of the number of stories proposed, an 1800 SF house SHOULD NOT be built on a 2030 SF lot. The fact that the sewer runs directly through the center of the lot makes the usable area even smaller. Another consideration is the impact on traffic on this street. 28th avenue is heavily traveled, and the average speed is over the posted 35 mph as cars accelerate to get up the hill. There have been several accidents and near accidents in the past few years as residents slow down to enter their driveways. At this lot, the road is elevated well above the lot level, making entering and exiting the roadway even more hazardous. Let's get real about this! This sort of allowance is why Federal Way's population density is as high as it is. We hope you give this serious consideration, and determine that the proposed project is unacceptable. David and Sue Marsh 30527 28th Ave. S. cc: Greg Moore 1 'i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION No. F81 STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING )ss. , ,,g ' s 4w: I,Carla Royter,being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: k t '. That she is the Marketing Director of The Federal Way News, The owto. a tri-weekly newspaper which is now and at all times herein mined 1" ..40 mentioned has been published and printed in an office maintained +' ^*�'r at the place of publication at Federal Way, King County, Verse '" E►'ni/M tr Washington, that by order of the Superior Court of the State of la not`' , "TT' ^ ; _R'CW Washington in and for King County, said newspaper is now and 43.210.03( '; S i. WM at all times mentioned herein has been approved as a legal mode r • e z + sen' newspaper for thepublication of anyadvertisement, notice, w M . - - � = , summons, report, proceedings, or other official document a required by law to be published, that said newspaper was ,�' .' filk published regularly at least once each week, in the English dens,°0,11 , ;A language,as a newspaper of general circulation in Federal Way, Lake. '" . ,4t APPi _ King County, Washington, at the time of application to the LOC/ 1lnt:'�QAt$ �,-.< ' L,porMp *At(' aforementioned Superior Court for approval as a legal newspaper, )' t t a'jthis ID- and was so published for at least six months prior to the date of UM ffi • re. said publication,and is now and at all times mentioned herein has quest`a 4 ,i t ' apt, been so published. 01 ` 1° ya That the annexed is a true copy of a Notice by the City Wily > ''. `' % , of Federal Way of Environmental DNS for a new residence; Feder Applicant Doris Messier; File No. SEP95-0024 'Y (206)-66141 , tmdbr.WA►' s'1971 must be-' - sp ..en 12/ as it was published in regular issues of said newspapers once each lirtiees'ketiOlideY he C* week for a termination Wilt. period of one consecutive week(s), commencing the t Warlord 4060101VAIWt. olt grievest by the 4 anal Aelsandret- on the 16th day of November , 1995, and ending lion may f le 8fl within`14 dayp ell*. suovemmmem N on the 16th day of November , 1995, both dates doe kw. - 4$•'' Published' in the Federal News inclusive,and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its on NeIYMIrQtM 1e,11106 subscribers and as a newspaper of general circulation during all of said period. That the 1 amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publican n��$34.9 Subscribed and sworn to be or a this 24th day of November , 1995 Jr/ri#, / NotaW blic in a d fir t, State o A ashington Residing at Seattle. My commt sion exp es 5/30/99. RECEIVED NOV 2 7 1995 MA Au r;v .:N7 1-3VICEc CITY OF FEiEFtAL '.40/ CITY OF 10 (206)661-4000 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NO. : SEP95-0024 Description of Proposal: new 1800 sf. residence on a 4550 sf. lot abutting Steel Lake. Proponent: DORIS MESSIER Location: 30521 28TH AVE S Lead Agency: City of Federal Way The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, the "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist; Application No. SEP95-0024" for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to R.C.W. 43 .21C. 060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under R.C.W. 43 . 21C. 032 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) ; the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. on 12/01/95. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Contact Person: Bill Kingman Phone: 661-4000 Associate Planner Responsible Official: Gregory D. Moore, AICP Position/Title: Director of Community Development Services f Address: 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date issued: 11/16/95 Signature: 4-7 • City of Federal Way FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Application No. SEP95-0024 Date: November 7, 1995 Project Name: Messier Residence Proposal: New 1800 square foot residence Applicant: Greg Otto & Doris Messier, POB 12003, Portland, OR 97212, Phone: (503) 287-3142 Location: 30521 28th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA S-T-R: Section 9, Township 21, Range 4 East, W.M. Parcel Size: 4550 square feet Actions: SEPA review, Process II Shoreline Variance and Building Permit Site Zoning: RS 7.2, residential single family Comprehensive Plan Designation: Suburban Residential A. BACKGROUND: The proposed action is to construct a 1800 square foot residence on a 4550 square foot lot. SEPA review is necessary because the proposal is located within a critical area (regulated lake setback of Steel Lake). For reference, the proposed residence is setback six and one-half feet from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of Steel Lake and is within the 25 foot shoreline setback of Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1332 and 20 foot shoreline setback requirement of Washington Administrative Code 173-20-360. Analysis of the proposal is based on the submitted checklist dated October 5, 1995 and site plan drawings. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: The lot is vacant. The 1973 USDA Soil Conservation Service's (SCS) Soil Survey for the King County Area classifies the soils as Arents (AmC). Runoff 1 potential is medium. Erosion hazard is moderate to severe. The lot is not in a problem area relative to erosion and steep slope hazard areas as identified by the King County and City of Federal Way Sensitive Areas maps. Slopes on the lot are approximately 13 percent grade. Auger cast piles are proposed to anchor the house foundation. A geotechnical report addressing engineering issues related to piling construction will be provided with the building permit. Approximately 37 cy. of fill will be imported for the driveway. Grading is regulated by the City's Land Surface Modification policy (Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1091). A temporary erosion/sedimentation plan shall be provided with the building permit application related to this proposal. Maximum lot coverage (impervious surface ratio) for the lot is limited to 60 percent. Proposed impervious surface ratio is 52 percent. No further mitigation is necessary. 2. Air: Short term impacts to air quality will occur during construction and paving operations. Longer term impacts due to vehicle emissions will vary in level according to the amount of traffic generated in the future by the proposal. Construction activity, especially site preparation work, will contribute to a short term increase in local suspended particulate levels. Construction activity also contributes to carbon monoxide levels through the operation of construction machinery, the use of trucks to deliver equipment and materials, and worker access to the lot by automobile. These activities also involve emissions of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen, potentially elevating the level of photochemical oxidants, such as ozone, in the ambient air. Automobiles will be the primary contributor to local additional carbon monoxide levels, with the highest levels occurring near congested areas. Longer term air quality impacts due to vehicle emissions will vary in level according to the amount of traffic generated by use of the lot. Compliance with local, state and federal air quality standards will provide sufficient mitigation of the potential onsite impacts of construction activities. Additionally, the continued application of effective maintenance and operation procedures, and periodic watering of the lot may be employed to keep the generation of dust within acceptable limits during excavation, fill, and construction phases, as required by the city. No further mitigation is necessary. 3. Water: Surface Water: The proposal abuts Steel Lake, a 19.2 acre freshwater lake developed with residential homes. Steel Lake is identified as a regulated lake by the FWCC and wetland by the King County Wetland Inventory, Washington State Department of Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Regulated lake permit and design 2 • requirements take precedence over wetland permit and design requirements due to the type of wetland identified by the above agencies (open water), the developed nature of Steel Lake and proposed scope of work. Pollutants from automobiles accumulating on paved surfaces may include heavy metals, petrochemicals and other substances. Some of these pollutants will be separated out of the storm water runoff by the proposed onsite oil/water separator and grass lined biofiltration swale prior to entering Steel Lake. Roof drains will be tightlined directly to Steel Lake. A detailed analysis of the storm drainage design will occur with the related building permit. The drainage system will conform with all applicable Core and Special Requirements outlined in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. No further mitigation is necessary. 4. Plants: No significant trees, as defined by FWCC, are within the proposed construction area. 5. Animals: Concur with checklist. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: Energy provisions for the proposal will conform with applicable local, state and federal regulations as part of the related building permit. No further mitigation is necessary. 7. Environmental Health: Noise levels will increase on a short term basis during construction activity. These will be controlled by required conformance with local noise ordinances which regulate hours of construction. No further mitigation is necessary. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: The lot is zoned RS 7.2, residential single family, minimum lot size 7,200 sf. The city Comprehensive Plan designation is Suburban Residential. The lot is classified as a "legal building site" because it was recorded with King County Assessors Office prior to February 28, 1990 and the lot has not been simultaneously owned by the owner of a contiguous lot subsequent to that date. The Shoreline Management Act designation is Urban. A Process II shoreline variance is requested to allow the proposed shoreline setback of six and one-half feet. For reference, the Urban shoreline designation setback from the OHWM is 20 feet. The variance is requested due to an existing 10 foot wide sewer easement which traverses the site in a north/south orientation and reduces the buildable portion of the lot. Lakehaven Utility District will not support any intrusion within the sewer easement. Additionally, the structure is proposed within a FWCC defined regulated lake setback of 25 feet. The proposal will examined for conformance with applicable regulated lake intrusion decisional criteria of FWCC Section 22-1334(4) with review of the related shoreline variance. No further mitigation is necessary. 3 9. Housing: Concur with checklist. 10. Aesthetics: Concur with checklist. 11. Light and Glare: All exterior illumination will be designed or shielded to eliminate offsite glare. No further mitigation is necessary. 12. Recreation: Concur with checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Presentation: Concur with checklist. 14. Transportation: The lot abuts 28th Avenue South, classified as a minor arterial by the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. One paved driveway will provide vehicular access from the proposed residence to the street. Right-of-way improvements will be determined with review of the related building permit for the residence. No further mitigation is necessary. 15. Public Services: No increase in public services is necessary for the proposal provided all applicable City and affected agency design requirements, including King County Fire District #39, are met. No further mitigation is necessary. 16. Utilities: Domestic water, at a rate of more than 1,000 gallons per hour, and sanitary sewer services will be provided to the proposal if service connections to available main lines are made. D. CONCLUSION: The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, based upon the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above 'Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Application #SEP95-0024, and are supported by plans, policies and regulations formally adopted by the City for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. The City reserves the right to review any future revisions or alterations to the lot or the proposal in order to determine the environmental significance or non-significance of the project at that point in time. Prepared by: Bill Kingman, AICP, Associate Planner'�V Date: November 7, 1995 SEP9524.ENV 4 APB` W I I T OF DIS1 A UTI#N hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that: ❑ Notice of Application 0 Notice of Proposed Land Use Action ❑ Notice of Action 0 Notice of Public Meeting ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline ❑ Notice of Public Land Use Hearing Management Permit ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Determination of Non- 0 Official Notice Significance and Scoping Notice ❑Notice of Environmental Determination ❑Other of Non-Significance (SEPA) Veotice of Environmental Mitigated ❑Other termination of Non-Significance (SEPA) was mailed / faxed / posted to/at each of following addresses (see attached list) on \''`( , 1995. Project Name •� tea . ,N k-- - �- File Number(s) Signature `— __ Date ‘‘ AmDAw Doc Reviser) 114/95 The City Of Federal Way posted the attached proposal to the following locations: The Federal Way Regional Library 34200 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way Library 848 South 320th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way City Hall (Bulliten Board) 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 6 A NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Federal Way, Washington Application No: SEP95-0024 The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. Proposed Action: new 1800 sf. residence on a 4550 sf. lot abutting Steel Lake. Applicant: DORIS MESSIER Location: 30521 28TH AVE S Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development, Federal Way City Hall, 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA, 98003, Contact: Bill Kingman, Associate Planner Phone: (206) 661-4108. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11- 340 (2) . Comments must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. on 12/01/95. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City' s final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way News on 11/16/95. II., ,':pow R SIOs •i •i 1 t I, • .I i�I11 '.`� I E5 q 5603 40 133 10 CM) 60 �1 ,Alit,�.. 1,+� •gy _� 11) a I i m At m I. •J It$� 0 � 30. 1 '� J y rjf�, { �� ` '� d. ,.z "I'1'-1I1 91 4 00.73Ac. -`- � yP�� iE' } -E: Co Aso' U�.. �)J Ito0t �', Air T1 xp0' of,' er /9 o (1) (2) (3) (4) I SC9 >"�. s� - — . " �T�� 5.090:, 4 (31r 1� 30, ,- rib lz). 4zsi N E i . s.l t _ `. r J � �✓� '��C�..> 1 �t- ® • - Ise: � :.�,:,-.- `1 '"„ � _ ���s �' ,.,nl �' , 791 .1%i:01: t 1 1 � i N - o 40 S.B 179012 ��.,�. w� . -�_� .,. 33` - ; . ( 1 ��rr:.,m■_ __-- ll) (2) CIA a a . 1. - . .- l��5 tt < J f�U /Jn n 3,�—s�L �-i"�\''(L,� f(�1:,./1.0 3 `®5/8 253 {(kr,yl 0606 :si .1C Sll ,s}'� n , 4-Rp k,,A.II s L— -..—iifi) • ,n • P e JW..e.-^, are -,s— 353 `-'n _ a mnl \ rpm I.. ( \) 'Gc+r.i 'n n.'ertsf in.bAr I 1. ``--___ +Valet .9 8n `/ s li) �� m No G-0 '' / srzn os — 3)zrx J ;s(S A[. idnif�,' 7 Xll 11L51PC I L31T )u1x ” t37 V X/1 0.86 At. �i MI!I L M l 1 ,A�la h$ JIi- � gwa '_ 3 ssTM ^u, ®0.10 Ac. '',`s.n ,.T 1 '-rtSM1 I -��y . .. -- _-�..r��—' = 1s-�'. 3- l4 sort nos _ .-320 • ST E r. .. m,•ram � NO®Ac. zi N 1•I,:es E biico,n Op, ,, N., ...„ a,,;71;if, - ,.., ——kJ,: .41525 y •�00 a ,V41 l2. 1 I 1 a S 32(I1N n• w /J/ i3 _- - I lubclu Cabin 1$ {j .t'[ #r�.r s '"' j '" 5 Rom` ri.,' , -jr l I,.c4_ l> fa. 1i _ . gt,'4._ S' ' ' ,,, NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Federal Way, Washington Application No: SEP95-0024 The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. Proposed Action: new 1800 sf. residence on a 4550 sf. lot abutting Steel Lake. Applicant: DORIS MESSIER Location: 30521 28TH AVE S Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development, Federal Way City Hall, 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA, 98003, Contact: Bill Kingman, Associate Planner Phone: (206) 661-4108. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11- 340(2) . Comments must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. `on 12/01/95. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City' s final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way News on 11/16/95. CITY OP — V 33430 1ST WAY BQUTH C2p6'001 FEDERAL WAY.WA o+9p03-6-4p0021p Mayor Mary C3latss Council Members 7aok Dovey City Manager Hope Hider Kenneth EL Nyberg Ron Qintz Michael Park Mahlon ^Skip^ Priest Philip Watkins FAX TI2ANSMITTA>L, MEMORAIrTIS /U/IV�I 6r,. 1:3ATE: I 1 / ) .e-e' [ �! -27C-2 N'CIMBSI2 C F PAGES (Including Mcrrxo Shoot) - ` R.C>M: t�t� �lnlr�r►1A4".) OFFICE QF: L/q [ �cF P[ t p3 r e Be. s+-r rz t G-Lik.,ra wr.?", n•i.��r✓i4__ C� 'r! �t Al- ES es-4 ^r lr t-Jft k'- `^� c c<.2 04.F"l r7 ✓ !3 f PGG B a_--f C.i -77 a N. T 1-0,4n.3 lit.. IT there are any problems during this transmission, please tall 66 Y,-4000 wad ask for` TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) WAS SENT ** COUNT ** # 2 *** SEND *** NO REMOTE STATION I. D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT 1 2062412776 11-14-95 13:31 I 1 '33" 2 TOTAL 0:01 ' 33" 2 XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 a• PUBLIC WORKS EMEMFIL. MEMORANDUM v� TO: Bill Kingman FROM: Julie Venn For Your Information Date: November 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Messier Residence The Public Works Department has reviewed the SEPA checklist submitted for this project and has no comments or conditions. All Public Works issue will be addressed through the building permit process. TECHNICAL REVIEW (RESIDENTIAL) Agenda Date: October 26, 1995 Subject: Messier Res/SEP95-0024/UPR95-0025/Kingman To: Development Review Committee From: Greg Brozek, Fire Marshal's Office - K.C.F.D. #39 WATER SUPPLIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION A Certificate of Water Availability shall be provided indicating the fire flow available at the site. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 700 ft. or less apart. Every building lot shall have a fire hydrant within 350 ft. All measurements shall be made as vehicular travel distance. Fire hydrants shall be in service PRIOR to the start of combustible construction. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in Group R, Division 3 occupancies: 1) When the occupancy exceeds 2,500 square feet (including attached garages) without adequate fire flow. 2) Without approved fire department access. 3) When the occupancy exceeds 10,000 square feet. 4) When the building is classified as an over-water structure. Comments The minimum fire flow for one- and two-family dwellings shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. . L THESE COMMENTS ARE VALID FOR 180 DAYS FROM REVIEW AND ONLY FOR THE PLANS REVIEWED. 4 I • 33530 First Way South ._1111. Federal Way WA 98003 NN) Phone (206) 661-4000 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of Checklist for Non-project Proposals: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions (part D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. 2 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: Doris A. Messier / R. Greg Otto 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: P.O. Box 12003 Portland, OR 97212 (503) 287-3142 4. Date checklist prepared: 6-4-95 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way Federal Way Dept. of Community Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Shoreline variance by October 1, 1995 Building permit by December 1, 1995 & related utilities permits 7. . Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • None 3 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Federal Way Shoreline Permit City Shorelines Variance Building Permit Utilities Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Proposed an 1800 square foot single family dwelling. The site is a building lot bordering on Steele Lake. The lot is 35' x 130' with the west 70' of the lot under water. The east side of the lot borders on 28th Ave. S. . There are single family dwellings on the north and south side of the site. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address:" 304XX - 28th Ave. S. QTR: NE SECT: 9 TWN: 21 RNG: 4 FOLIO Tax Lot 9092 4 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH • a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. The lot slopes away from the road. In the first 20 ft. the lot drops 5 ft. The rest of the lot drops one foot to the line of vegetation and 3 ft. to the water line. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 20° from the road, 20 ft. into the lot. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Loose mixed silt, sand, gravel, debris, rocks, rubble, organics, etc. A { Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill from road, 25 ft. into lot for 20 ft. wide driveway. Depth of fill to be 4 ft. at the house foundation to 0 ft. at the road edge. --/-k fiw f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. None 5 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 52% coverage from house and asphalt drive. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Landscaping using perenial plants and rockery, on 20° grade on either side of driveway. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. None 6 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Steele Lake borders on the west side of the lot. There is no inlet. The outlet flows to Puget Sound. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The proposed single family dwelling will be built within 200 ft. of the lake. The dwelling will be located 6 to 7 ft. east of the shoreline. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 37 cubic yards of fill for the driveway from the road, 28th Ave. S. , to the house. Mixed sand and gravel fill from a quarry. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 7 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans thd system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water). 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Building run-off will be tight-lined to outlet to Steele Lake. Roof drains will have rip rap protection. Storm water run-off from vehicular use areas will be treated by separate storm drains with an oil/water separator and a bioswale. 8 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. None 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. a deciduous tree: alder maple, aspen, other ❑ evergreen tree: ir, cedar, pine, other . :� grass 0 pasture 0 crop or grain ❑ we soil plants: cattail buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other fit water plant: eelgrass, milfoil, other cattail ig other types of vegetation Japanese iris b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass and blackberries in foot print of house and driveway. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None 9 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Japanese iris exist at shorline -- Addition of more iris, additional natural grasses. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Ducks mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: catfish b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None 10 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity for appliances, natural gas for heat. • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. As required by code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk • of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None • 11 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. None b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Traffic noise 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise associated with construction of single family dwelling. Trucks for concrete and lumber and auger cast pilings. Hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Delivery of materials between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is a vacant lot. Adjacent properties are single family dwellings. 12 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. There are currently no structures on the site except a 20' dock built prior to 1963. A two bedroom home existed on the site during • the 1940's but was removed prior to 1963. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? • None e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Residential - Single family dwellings RS 7.2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Suburban residential g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban 13 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Environmentally sensitive area (wetland) , regulated lake and shoreline. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 2 residents. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. Meeting Federal Way zoning and building requirements. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Single family dwelling for middle income housing. 14 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Building height of 35' Exterior of lap siding or T1-11 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Incremental view blockage for home on Tax Lot 9260. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. None 15 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. None 12. RECREATION • a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? City park: swimming, boating (non-motorized) , fishing 16 b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. N/A 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or.:proposed for, .nation, :state,- or local • preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally.describe. N/A b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. N/A 17 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Site borders on 28th Ave. S. . Access via 10' curb cut to street from driveway. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Bus service on Military Road approximately 4 blocks away. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Three parking spaces would be provided. No current parking exists; none would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No ,18 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. From 0 to 6 trips per day. Approximate peak volume at 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire • protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Project would increase the need for services for occupants of a 3 bedroom single family dwelling. • b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Project to be built to Federal Way Dept. of Community Development codes. 19 16. UTILITIES a. ' Circle utilities currentl available at the site: electricity natural gas„=� efuse telephone sanitary rn , r seweD septic system, other (please ist . b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electric: Puget Power Natural Gas: Northwest Natural Gas Water & Sewer: Lakehaven Utility On site construction only. Construction activity for all utilities will be trenching and placement of all utilities below ground level. C. SIGNATURE The above answers a true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relyin on them to make its ecision. Signature: Date Submitted: CC- o S, l° 5 1,. _ October 2, 1995 Mr. Kingman City of Federal Way 33530 - 1st Way S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Dear Mr. Kingman, RE: Statement Discussing Criteria for Variance and Materials for Variance Application. PROPOSAL: We are requesting a variance to permit the construction of a single family dwelling on Tax Lot 92 on Steel Lake, in Section 9 TWP 21 North, Range 4 East WM in King County, Washington (see Attachment #1) . In or- der to locate a dwelling on the lot, a variance for shoreline setback and parking in the setback will be required. HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY: Archival records indicate that Tax Lot 92 was segmented October 4, 1941. It has remained the same since that time. Records also indicate that a 700 sq. ft. single family dwelling was built on the property in 1944. Records do not indicate when the dwelling was removed. A sewer easement was granted in 1962 and subsequently a sewer line was installed. CRITERIA: G 1. The variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege. Several homes in the area are within the shoreline setback and/or allow park- ing in the setback. Two homes, adjoining to the north, are within the shoreline setback and/or allow parking in the setback (see Drawing #3) . v2. The variance is necessary because a sewer line runs diagonally through the lot at a point 17 feet into the lot on the south property line, and at a point 24 feet into the lot on the north property line. The size of the lot and the configuration of the sewer easement create a hardship that can be alleviated by a variance from the shoreline set- back and by allowing parking in the setback (see Drawing #1) . v 3. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public wel- fare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. Two adjacent homes are closer to the shoreline than what we are re- questing and one has parking in the setback (see Drawing #3) . Our dwelling will be in keeping with the use of surrounding properties and does not request anything other properties don't enjoy. k. Page 2 October 2, 1995 RE: Statement Discussing Criteria for Variance and Materials for Variance Application tj 4. The special circumstances of the subject property are due to a sewer easement granted in 1962. The easement pre-dated shoreline regula- tions and under current requirements allows insufficient room to build a single family dwelling. Lake Haven Utility District has been approached on several occasions to allow encroachment on the sewer easement. They have denied any encroachment on the existing sewer easement (see Drawing #1) . The proposed dwelling would set approximately 6 feet from the surveyed shore- line. It would also set approximately 5 feet east of a line drawn between the mid-points of the structures on the adjoining lots to the north and to the south of the proposed dwelling (see Drawing #3) . If further information is needed, please let us know. Res ecpily tJ 1r' R. Greg Otto Doris A. Messier P.O. Box 12003 Portland, OR 97212 Enclosures: 1 - Master Land Use Application 1 - Application for Shoreline Variance Permit 8 - Environmental Checklists 1 - Sewer Availability Sheet 1 - Water Availability Sheet 2 - Letters Denying Sewer Easement Encroachment 1 - Copy of Address Labels 1 - Copy of King County Assessors Map (3 pages) 2 - Sets Addressed / Stamped Envelopes 8 - Sets of Site Plans (3 pages each) Lakehaven Utility District 31627 - 1st Avenue South • P.O. Box 4249 • Federal Way, Washington 98063 Seattle: 941-1516 • Tacoma: 927-2922 • Engineering: 941-2288 • Fax: 839-9310 October 24, 1994 Mr. Greg Otto P.O. Box 12003 Portland, OR 98212 RE: Encroachment of Existing Easement Tax Lot 92, STR 9-21-4 Dear Mr. Otto: The District has reviewed your request to construct a house and garage over the existing sanitary sewer. We will not allow any encroachment on the existing sanitary sewer easement on the • referenced property. The ten-foot easement, five feet on both sides of the existing sewer, needs to remain free of any obstructions. This information should be considered when you develop a conceptual layout of a residence for this property. Please contact the District, at 941-2288, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Richard Q. Gilmore, P.E. Supervisor of Technical Services RQG/jmr c: City of Federal Way Building Department Don Young, Director of Water Operations Bill Martin, Director of Sewer Operationsf Dale A. Cap Joel R. Marks Dick Mayer Donald L.P. Miller Beverly J. Twaddle Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT P.O. BOX 4249 31627-1st AVENUE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WASHINGTON 98003 Seattle:941-1516 Tacoma:927-2922 October 9 , 1984 R. Greg Otto 8240 South 122nd Seattle , WA 98178 Subject : Sewer Service Dear Mr . Otto : As you are aware , the District has a sanitary sewer pipe located on the property that you wish to build a house on . The District shall not allow any structure to be built over the existing sanitary sewer easement and pipe . To determine the exact location of the easement and pipe , you must have a registered professional engineer or surveyor submit a stamped plan layout of the existing sanitary sewer . After the District receives that document , then your request will be reviewed. If you have any questions , please contact the District . Very ruly yours , L ohn A. ensen Engine ing Aide III JAJ : dfk cc : Manager 111,11111 gyp• W4 p G>' S F9 Sr'MEN1�� <�;►l E ' ✓y 0 •P• t...) . • Dis N 8 r.=1 4. r ID T : 4rr art ~ b ~N • • • •• pJ a try w troa y tryw ° �H CA rt �. a• M+ a to C Cu hz b O l� s. z 0 z a 1.. H. rt n '1-h fD at HI kcl to k.1 N• V� � rt rt O O(' '! OoH H 6 z °II 11 0' z 1noK 0 m m P. C to No\�1� p ` c+ yHO OO i � ( Omtt k 1•• rt r0 Ii It i La N r1 0 rt a tA n , 1,.. N. O aJ' C !(^f H. Q f M 1-• o F-' C CuF� O O D Port m i A a Nmr r ct co 5 E /1M l nM O rt ~ to mP �. P ' ,. of ON '\ Oo OO PC ► M. ba rt O O O rt H.tDHrt- m I--. ct w o rt 11011 rt O' r• kO' M O m POO '' ri. o a w ' mmrt►-ip' 5 amid O mm mm w rt m ,� EIt r to H c Z a' o m N r• � O .-. et it t0 to E z ZO � buioa m 011 tn M roNM ECo a P• n C Ii CI h to b 0� M '0o it ,.� � 1,• u. r o rt lb ' ••• C0' ° o 00 m m � • P. mr N ai ; o oaMZm _1� � m M a r' mw m Ui' m rt o M o , O Z O tC r k ^N N " Cri0 - rt r• to , O rt rtF1• ¢3 N 1.1 � O O r• rt A f1 g¢' ao rtto m m w a rt a.o aN ti f w O O tr ro o m 1-4 a) ts `- O HI to r,L) F•h C A E v K ra, m to E m 8 ¢�o Ma) rto roI % II 0) wr rt a Mm P. \ 7v o ' o ► t_ti �t C Pa rt M �,,ro m nm om D " o' .` `c ro II rt 0 o m \ y " It m c a w N m —1tD 'd rt �. n mm ro c m E O oIr F PO am0 O a II omIiao r r• i b' r+ n H. rn •a s C ~' m O' m m .m r• L CDC .q rta i rt w rt a m A ro��" rt m m , m. O g m a r• r• rt r+ rr 0 0r ., rr, CD O m rt N 0 0 F. r• r h a O" K ft 1-1 w O rt r• O O \ h3 `C r- a r o f aC) O tCA O O Nn r• m rt DO m E 0 rno m}{ � R !N. a wI-, mwMrt C rr 1✓ f Ul 0 P. tiMn fl ti 1' O rt rt It 0 Fh fD rn 0. • fi` N. ram+ I0h N S rb (�D W m "c O h car 73 N a W , , d9 an tD O a r• Ill a It r• ,t a o E m c ' 0+ r rt 1-� O O hi 0' w rt O O 41 .. a C m 0 0 � O i P. Os 0 vK a. N n � m n e rr m o N h < wam D O. 0 (0 ch c+• I-h O O N I+ R. m O Po O O n M b ? 3 0 m 0 O ct -- rt m p, m w o M " C rt m PI) v h N o ~' O rt m' m O' m C b « N Z riII )i A F.. romooN a m O 1 mm 64 m 1 o2' G) m (D `C P. o m 11 G 5 It a m MmN mx m r• Ul X bd c3 Q° rt r A ' on 0 <i Ii rt w; ° mwr Cw N w rt , , ' N c+ UI c+ o O O A • m m 0 7 Z iLlrt ro li O m N• D + N1-1 Aa` CD ^ Or n tWO 7 0 4 ?OOO fi m mD Ii 0 m N:tW\ O m 0 O M ° ro 'N. Ii I 0 mr' m rt E Y• pp li ca < G m m m m N 0 i• CD t-F\ H. E o PCI N N CD C m ' r '" O a' rt Pj tr. YI\ 1't +YSp �'�