94-100231 FILE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
APPLICATION NO. SEPA-94-0003
April 6, 1994
Project Name: Wilson Short Plat
Applicant: William Wilson Phone: 778-0442
Contact: Sandy Blondell Phone: 838-2500
Location: 31105 - 28th Avenue South, Lot 1, Block 4 of the plat of Steel Lake Terrace
S-T-R: SW 9-21-4
Parcel Size: 14,560 square feet
Type of Action: Short Plat
Proposal: Subdivision of a 14,560 square foot lot with an existing structure into two 7,280
square foot lots.
Existing Zoning: RS-7.2
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Suburban Residential
Pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(2), the City of Federal Way is required to send the environmental
determination that results from this environmental review, along with the checklist, to the
Department of Ecology and other agencies with jurisdiction. Therefore, the City will not act
on the proposal for fifteen days after issuance of the environmental threshold determination.
A. Background:
1, 2. The formal short plat application was taken out in the name of William Wilson
and is called Wilson's Short Plat.
3. Wilson's address is 5601 225th SW, Mount Lake Terrace, WA 98043
5. The agency requesting the checklist is City of Federal Way Community
Development Services.
7. Future activity may include the construction of a residence on the new lot created
with the short plat process.
10. Future development of the proposed lots will be subject to all applicable codes,
policies and development regulations.
11. Lot 1, Block 4 of Steel Lake Terrace is proposed to be subdivided into two 7280
square foot lots. The site zoning is RS-7.2, with the minimum lot size 7200
square feet.
B: Environmental Elements:
1. Earth:
a: The site is generally described as flat and rolling. A one story house is currently
situated on the eastern portion of the site facing 28th Avenue South. The proposed
short plat will provide two single family residential lots, one which is appropriate
for future development. A building permit will be required, as well as right of
way permits for required street improvements.
b. Concur with checklist: Approximately eight percent.
c: The soils on this site are mapped as Alderwood Gravelly sandy loams (AgB) by
the USDA Soils Conservation Service 1973 Soil Survey. Runoff with this type
of soil is classified as slow and erosion hazard is slight.
d: Concur with checklist.
e: Concur with checklist: Grade and fill activities during future construction will be
designed and constructed in accordance with the City's regulations for erosion and
sedimentation control.
f: The site is located in the Central Lower Puget Sound Sub Basin. King County
sensitive area maps and site inspection do not reveal the site to be a problem area
relative to landslides, seismic hazards, erosion, wetlands, or 100-year floodplains.
g: Impervious surface allowances for the single family residence will be subject to
lot coverage provisions of the Federal way City Code (FWCC)
h: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan is required to be
approved and implemented in conjunction with filling and grading activities, in
accordance with the City's engineering standards, using the appropriate methods
under the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM).
2. Air:
a: Short term impacts to air quality will occur during construction and paving
operations. Longer term impacts due to vehicle emissions will vary in level
according to the amount of traffic generated in the future by the proposal.
Construction activity, especially site preparation work, will contribute to a short
term increase in local suspended particulate levels. Construction activity also
contributes to carbon monoxide levels through the operation of construction
machinery, the use of trucks to deliver equipment and materials, and worker
access to the site by automobile. These activities also involve emissions of
hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen, potentially elevating the level of
photochemical oxidants, such as ozone, in the ambient air.
Natural gas mains up to 2 inches in diameter are installed in the right-of-way of
South 311th Street and 28th Avenue South. It is not known whether wood stoves
or fireplaces are proposed.
b: Concur with checklist.
c: Compliance with local, state and federal air quality standards will provide
sufficient mitigation of the potential onsite impacts of construction activities or
heating methods. In addition, retention of significant trees and vegetation will
provide filtering of suspended particulates.
3. Water:
a. Surface: The site is located approximately 1000 feet southwest of wetland number
Hylebos 2, (known as Steel Lake), a class 1(C) wetland per King County wetland
inventory.
b. Ground: Structures that increase the impervious surface area by 500 feet or more
must provide runoff control by tight-lining to an approved storm drainage system.
The City of Federal Way requires the use of on-site infiltration systems for runoff
control where the appropriate soil conditions exist. Sewer service is available to
the newly created lot via side sewer connection to the existing mainline in South
311th Street.
c. Water Runoff: The checklist indicates that "sheetflow from 28th Avenue South
will be absorbed into the ground in the right of way ditch". As with all paved
developed areas, the project site will contribute pollutants to ground and surface
waters through runoff from required right-of-way improvements, buildings,
driveways, patios and other impervious surfaces. Future improvements and
associated traffic will discharge oils, grease, antifreeze and metals into the ground
and surface waters.
The City Short Plat process requires implementation of adopted road standards.
The proposed short plat fronts two roads that do not meet current road
improvement standards. FWCC section 22-1473 requires full width right-of-way
improvements along South 311th Street, a minimum paving width of 28 feet,
vertical curbs and five foot sidewalks with a minimum four foot wide
utility/landscaping strip. Full width right-of-way improvements along 28th
Avenue South are also required with a minimum 60 foot wide right-of-way,
minimum paving width of 40 feet, vertical curbs, street lighting, and five foot
sidewalks with four foot utility/landscaping strips planted with street trees. If fully
developed, these right-of-way improvements may create up to 4000 square feet
of impervious area. It is assumed that future house and driveway improvements
on lot B could create up to 3000 square feet of impervious area.
The whole project has the potential to create more than 5000 square feet of
impervious surfaces. If the short plat is approved without modification, the
applicant shall be required to provide storm water drainage improvements
applicable under the 1992 King County Surface Water Design Manual
(KCSWDM), including surface water detention, biofiltration, and oil/water
separation to mitigate identified impacts. Some pollutants could be separated out
of the storm water runoff, to a certain extent, by installing oil/water separators
in on-site catch basins, and/or by the use of grass-lined swales for pretreatment
and conveyance. The project must be designed to comply with all applicable
Core and Special Requirements outlined in the KCSWDM.
The site is located in the Central Lower Puget Sound Sub-Basin, as identified in
the Executive Proposed Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan. This
Basin Plan, while a draft, is the best tool available to identify surface, ground and
water-runoff impacts. The City of Federal Way uses the Basin Plan to guide
development and identify impacts.
The Basin Plan recommends storm drainage enhancements to adequately mitigate
the effects of development on water quality, flooding, and downstream erosion
in the Central Lower Puget Sound Sub-Basin. Specifically, basin wide
recommendation BW-2 calls for the use of the 2-year and 10-year 7-day rainfall
events for sizing the required detention facilities, as opposed to the standard 2-
year and 10-year 24-hour events. In addition, the BW-2 plans uses a modified
time of concentration that utilizes interflow. The standard thirty percent factor
of safety is not required.
Short plat improvements may create impacts that require mitigation under
guidelines used by the City. If the project generates more than 5000 square feet
of impervious surfaces, the applicant will be required to provide the applicable
storm water drainage improvements, including requirements of the King County
Surface Water Design Manual and the recommendations in the Basin Plan.
4. Plants: Vegetation on-site consists of several large fir trees, grass and domestic shrubs.
The rear of this site backs up to a wooded portion of Steel Lake Park. Trees that meet
the City code definition of "significant" must be identified and retained in accordance
with code requirements.
5. Animals: The site is adjacent to Steel Lake Park, a 52 acre multi-use park facility, that
includes Steel Lake. Portions of Steel Lake serve as a part of a bird migration route.
The lake is approximately 1000 feet from the short plat site. Based on information
provided in the environmental checklist and site inspection by city staff, no threatened
or endangered species are know to inhabit this site.
6. Energy and Natural Resources: Concur with checklist. Energy provisions for the
development will conform to applicable local, state and federal regulations.
7. Environmental Health:
a: The site is located outside of Ldn 65 Noise Contour of the Sea-Tac Airport
Future Noise Exposure map for 1996.
b: Noise levels created by the project will increase in a short term basis during
construction activity. These will be controlled by required conformance with
local noise ordinances that regulate hours of construction. A minor increase in
noise levels due to traffic generated by the development is expected on a long
term basis.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
a. A single family residence currently exists on the site. Single family residences
are on the west, north and east of the site. South of the site is Steel Lake Park.
b. Concur with checklist.
c. The existing house is approximately 1000 square feet. A small wooden shed is
west of the house.
d. The shed sits within the required side yard setback of the proposed lot A. It is
the applicants intent to relocate or demolish the shed to conform to code
requirements. Removal or relocation of the shed will be required prior to the
time that the short plat is recorded.
e. Concur with checklist. (RS-7.2) The proposed lots will conform to zoning
regulations.
f. The comprehensive plan designation of the site is Suburban Residential.
Proposed residences will comply with zoning regulations.
g. Concur with checklist.
h. Environmentally sensitive areas are not present on this site.
i. Its is anticipated that the site will be occupied by 4 to 8 people.
j. Concur with checklist.
k. Concur with checklist.
9. Housing: The proposed subdivision will create one additional new single family
residential lot.
10. Aesthetics: Construction of a single family home on the site will be subject to applicable
zoning regulations. Bulk and height of the structure will be subject to regulation for lot
coverage and maximum height. It is anticipated that the future development of the lot
will be compatible with the middle income character of the neighborhood.
11. Light and Glare: Levels of light normally associated with single family residences and
corresponding traffic is anticipated. No significant impact on light and glare is
anticipated as a result of the single family residence.
12. Recreation:
a. Designated and informal recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity
include Steel Lake Park, Steel Lake Fire Station Recreation Center, Steel Lake
Annex, and a running track at Continuation High School.
b. Concur with checklist.
c. The City of Federal Way Subdivision ordinance requires that all subdivisions
provide open space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land area of the
subdivision site; or if the site is five acres or less in size, an optional fee in lieu
of providing the open space is available via City Code Article II mitigation of
Development Impacts. The applicant will be required to comply with the
provisions of the selected code option.
13. Historic and Cultural Presentation: Concur with checklist.
14. Transportation:
a. The site is located on the south west corner of 28th Avenue South and South
311th Street. 28th Avenue South is classified as a Residential Collector. South
311th Street is designated Neighborhood Access.
b. The nearest METRO transit stop is located on South 312th approximately one
block south of the site.
c. Concur with checklist.
d. Right of way dedication at the corner of South 311th and 28th Avenue South is
required with the subdivision approval. Right of way improvements in
accordance with FWCC ssection 22-1525 would be required at the time lot B is
improved.
15. Public Services:
As with all new development, the site will increase the demand for public
services. Normal use of the site is not expected to significantly effect existing
service levels of the City's Police and Fire Departments.
16. Utilities: Federal Way Water and Sewer indicate that water and sewer service is available
to lot B from mains located in South 311th Street. Connection would be through side
service installation.
C. Conclusion:
The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment
if appropriate conditions are properly implemented pursuant to a Mitigated DNS. Conditions
of the MDNS are based upon impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments,
and the above "FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST", and
are supported by Plans and regulations formally adopted by the City for the exercise of
substantive authority under SEPA. The City reserves the right to review any future revisions
or alterations to the site or to the proposal in order to determine the environmental significance
or non-significance of the project at that point in time.
Prepared by: Deb Barker, Planning Technician
Date: April 11, 1994
sepafile\wilsonev.wp
L
rJ
CITY OF � . '''
__i Ep ._
�\) FEY33530 1ST WAY SOUTH • FEDERAL WAY,WASHINGTON 98003
April 8, 1994
FILE
Mr. William Wilson
5601 225th Street SW
Mount Lake Terrace, WA 98043
RE: MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION;
APPLICATION NO: SEP94-0003
Dear Mr. Wilson:
The Environmental Checklist you have submitted has been reviewed by this office and other
staff. We have determined that the proposal, in conjunction with mitigation measures identified
in the attached Mitigated Determination of Non-significance, does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. These measures have been established to mitigate specific
probable significant adverse environmental impacts identified in the Environmental Checklist and
related documents. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to
comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), if each of the attached measures are
properly implemented. A copy of the determination is enclosed.
A fifteen (15) day comment period is required by the SEPA Rules (WAC 197-11-340). A notice
inviting comments was published in the Federal Way News on April 12. 1994. At the end of
the comment period, the Department will determine if the MDNS should be withdrawn,
modified, or issued as proposed. All final determinations may be appealed within fourteen (14)
days following the comment deadline. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until
completion of the appeal period.
Our decision not to require an EIS does not mean that the license, permit, or approval you are
seeking from the City has been granted. Approval of denial of the proposal will be made by the
appropriate administrative or legislative body vested with that authority. The environmental
record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions may be imposed to reduce
identified environmental impacts as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated
City policy.
After a final decision has been made on your proposal (i.e., after a permit has been issued or
City Council action taken, as applicable), you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of
Action as set forth in RCW 43.21C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after
which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. A copy
of the Notice of Action form and copies of RCW 43.21C.080 and WAC 197-11-680, providing
Mitigated Environmental Threshold Determination
April 8, 1994
Page 2
instructions for giving this notice, are available from the Department of Community
Development.#
The City is liot responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. However, the City is
responsible for giving a notice (to parties of record) stating the date for commencing a judicial
appeal (including the SEPA portion of that appeal) if your proposal is one for which the City's
action on it has a specified time period within which any court appeals must be made.
If you need further assistance, feel free to contact Deb Barker, Planning Technician at 661-4103.
Sincerely,
. 7M,
Grego D. re, AICP
Director of ommunity Development Services
sepafile\wilsnmds.ltr
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
APPLICATION NO. SEPA-94-0003
April 6, 1994
Project Name: Wilson Short Plat
Applicant: William Wilson Phone: 778-0442
Contact: Sandy Blondell Phone: 838-2500
Location: 3110.5 - 28th Avenue South, Lot 1, Block 4 of the plat of Steel Lake Terrace
S-T-R: SW 9-21-4
Parcel Size: 14,560 square feet
Type of Action: Short Plat
Proposal: Subdivision of a 14,560 square foot lot with an existing structure into two 7,280
square foot lots.
Existing Zoning: RS-7.2
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Suburban Residential
Pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(2), the City of Federal Way is required to send the environmental
determination that results from this environmental review, along with the checklist, to the
Department of Ecology and other agencies with jurisdiction. Therefore, the City will not act
on the proposal for fifteen days after issuance of the environmental threshold determination.
A. Background:
1, 2. The formal short plat application was taken out in the name of William Wilson
and is called Wilson's Short Plat.
3. Wilson's address is 5601 225th SW, Mount Lake Terrace, WA 98043
5. The agency requesting the checklist is City of Federal Way Community
Development Services.
7. Future activity may include the construction of a residence on the new lot created
with the short plat process.
10. Future development of the proposed lots will be subject to all applicable codes,
policies and development regulations.
11. Lot 1, Block 4 of Steel Lake Terrace is proposed to be subdivided into two 7280
square foot lots. The site zoning is RS-7.2, with the minimum lot size 7200
square feet.
B: Environmental Elements:
1. Earth:
a: The site is generally described as flat and rolling. A one story house is currently
situated on the eastern portion of the site facing 28th Avenue South. The proposed
short plat will provide two single family residential lots, one which is appropriate
for future development. A building permit will be required, as well as right of
way permits for required street improvements.
b. Concur with checklist: Approximately eight percent.
c: The soils on this site are mapped as Alderwood Gravelly sandy loams (AgB) by
the USDA Soils Conservation Service 1973 Soil Survey. Runoff with this type
of soil is classified as slow and erosion hazard is slight.
d: Concur with checklist.
e: Concur with checklist: Grade and fill activities during future construction will be
designed and constructed in accordance with the City's regulations for erosion and
sedimentation control.
f: The site is located in the Central Lower Puget Sound Sub Basin. King County
sensitive area maps and site inspection do not reveal the site to be a problem area
relative to landslides, seismic hazards, erosion, wetlands, or 100-year floodplains.
g: Impervious surface allowances for the single family residence will be subject to
lot coverage provisions of the Federal way City Code (FWCC)
h: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan is required to be
approved and implemented in conjunction with filling and grading activities, in
accordance with the City's engineering standards, using the appropriate methods
under the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM).
2. Air:
a: Short term impacts to air quality will occur during construction and paving
operations. Longer term impacts due to vehicle emissions will vary in level
according to the amount of traffic generated in the future by the proposal.
Construction activity, especially site preparation work, will contribute to a short
term increase in local suspended particulate levels. Construction activity also
contributes to carbon monoxide levels through the operation of construction
machinery, the use of trucks to deliver equipment and materials, and worker
access to the site by automobile. These activities also involve emissions of
hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen, potentially elevating the level of
photochemical oxidants, such as ozone, in the ambient air.
Natural gas mains up to 2 inches in diameter are installed in the right-of-way of
South 311th Street and 28th Avenue South. It is not known whether wood stoves
or fireplaces are proposed.
b: Concur with checklist.
c: Compliance with local, state and federal air quality standards will provide
sufficient mitigation of the potential onsite impacts of construction activities or
heating methods. In addition, retention of significant trees and vegetation will
provide filtering of suspended particulates.
3. Water:
a. Surface: The site is located approximately 1000 feet southwest of wetland number
Hylebos 2, (known as Steel Lake), a class 1(C) wetland per King County wetland
inventory.
b. Ground: Structures that increase the impervious surface area by 500 feet or more
must provide runoff control by tight-lining to an approved storm drainage system.
The City of Federal Way requires the use of on-site infiltration systems for runoff
control where the appropriate soil conditions exist. Sewer service is available to
the newly created lot via side sewer connection to the existing mainline in South
311th Street.
c. Water Runoff: The checklist indicates that "sheetflow from 28th Avenue South
will be absorbed into the ground in the right of way ditch". As with all paved
developed areas, the project site will contribute pollutants to ground and surface
waters through runoff from required right-of-way improvements, buildings,
driveways, patios and other impervious surfaces. Future improvements and
associated traffic will discharge oils, grease, antifreeze and metals into the ground
and surface waters.
The City Short Plat process requires implementation of adopted road standards.
The proposed short plat fronts two roads that do not meet current road
improvement standards. FWCC section 22-1473 requires full width right-of-way
improvements along South 311th Street, a minimum paving width of 28 feet,
vertical curbs and five foot sidewalks with a minimum four foot wide
utility/landscaping strip. Full width right-of-way improvements along 28th
Avenue South are also required with a minimum 60 foot wide right-of-way,
minimum paving width of 40 feet, vertical curbs, street lighting, and five foot
sidewalks with four foot utility/landscaping strips planted with street trees. If fully
developed, these right-of-way improvements may create up to 4000 square feet
of impervious area. It is assumed that future house and driveway improvements
on lot B could create up to 3000 square feet of impervious area.
The whole project has the potential to create more than 5000 square feet of
impervious surfaces. If the short plat is approved without modification, the
applicant shall be required to provide storm water drainage improvements
applicable under the 1992 King County Surface Water Design Manual
(KCSWDM), including surface water detention, biofiltration, and oil/water
separation to mitigate identified impacts. Some pollutants could be separated out
of the storm water runoff, to a certain extent, by installing oil/water separators
in on-site catch basins, and/or by the use of grass-lined swales for pretreatment
and conveyance. The project must be designed to comply with all applicable
Core and Special Requirements outlined in the KCSWDM.
The site is located in the Central Lower Puget Sound Sub-Basin, as identified in
the Executive Proposed Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan. This
Basin Plan, while a draft, is the best tool available to identify surface, ground and
water-runoff impacts. The City of Federal Way uses the Basin Plan to guide
development and identify impacts.
The Basin Plan recommends storm drainage enhancements to adequately mitigate
the effects of development on water quality, flooding, and downstream erosion
in the Central Lower Puget Sound Sub-Basin. Specifically, basin wide
recommendation BW-2 calls for the use of the 2-year and 10-year 7-day rainfall
events for sizing the required detention facilities, as opposed to the standard 2-
year and 10-year 24-hour events. In addition, the BW-2 plans uses a modified
time of concentration that utilizes interflow. The standard thirty percent factor
of safety is not required.
Short plat improvements may create impacts that require mitigation under
guidelines used by the City. If the project generates more than 5000 square feet
of impervious surfaces, the applicant will be required to provide the applicable
storm water drainage improvements, including requirements of the King County
Surface Water Design Manual and the recommendations in the Basin Plan.
4. Plants: Vegetation on-site consists of several large fir trees, grass and domestic shrubs.
The rear of this site backs up to a wooded portion of Steel Lake Park. Trees that meet
the City code definition of "significant" must be identified and retained in accordance
with code requirements.
5. Animals: The site is adjacent to Steel Lake Park, a 52 acre multi-use park facility, that
includes Steel Lake. Portions of Steel Lake serve as a part of a bird migration route.
The lake is approximately 1000 feet from the short plat site. Based on information
provided in the environmental checklist and site inspection by city staff, no threatened
or endangered species are know to inhabit this site.
6. Energy and Natural Resources: Concur with checklist. Energy provisions for the
development will conform to applicable local, state and federal regulations.
7. Environmental Health:
a: The site is located outside of Ldn 65 Noise Contour of the Sea-Tac Airport
Future Noise Exposure map for 1996.
b: Noise levels created by the project will increase in a short term basis during
construction activity. These will be controlled by required conformance with
local noise ordinances that regulate hours of construction. A minor increase in
noise levels due to traffic generated by the development is expected on a long
term basis.
v.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
a. A single family residence currently exists on the site. Single family residences
are on the west, north and east of the site. South of the site is Steel Lake Park.
b. Concur with checklist.
c. The existing house is approximately 1000 square feet. A small wooden shed is
west of the house.
d. The shed sits within the required side yard setback of the proposed lot A. It is
the applicants intent to relocate or demolish the shed to conform to code
requirements. Removal or relocation of the shed will be required prior to the
time that the short plat is recorded.
e. Concur with checklist. (RS-7.2) The proposed lots will conform to zoning
regulations.
f. The comprehensive plan designation of the site is Suburban Residential.
Proposed residences will comply with zoning regulations.
g. Concur with checklist.
h. Environmentally sensitive areas are not present on this site.
i. Its is anticipated that the site will be occupied by 4 to 8 people.
j. Concur with checklist.
k. Concur with checklist.
9. Housing: The proposed subdivision will create one additional new single family
residential lot.
10. Aesthetics: Construction of a single family home on the site will be subject to applicable
zoning regulations. Bulk and height of the structure will be subject to regulation for lot
coverage and maximum height. It is anticipated that the future development of the lot
will be compatible with the middle income character of the neighborhood.
11. Light and Glare: Levels of light normally associated with single family residences and
corresponding traffic is anticipated. No significant impact on light and glare is
anticipated as a result of the single family residence.
12. Recreation:
a. Designated and informal recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity
include Steel Lake Park, Steel Lake Fire Station Recreation Center, Steel Lake
Annex, and a running track at Continuation High School.
b. Concur with checklist.
c. The City of Federal Way Subdivision ordinance requires that all subdivisions
provide open space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land area of the
subdivision site; or if the site is five acres or less in size, an optional fee in lieu
of providing the open space is available via City Code Article II mitigation of
Development Impacts. The applicant will be required to comply with the
provisions of the selected code option.
13. Historic and Cultural Presentation: Concur with checklist.
•
14. Transportation:
a. The site is located on the south west corner of 28th Avenue South and South
311th Street. 28th Avenue South is classified as a Residential Collector. South
311th Street is designated Neighborhood Access.
b. The nearest METRO transit stop is located on South 312th approximately one
block south of the site.
c. Concur with checklist.
d. Right of way dedication at the corner of South 311th and 28th Avenue South is
required with the subdivision approval. Right of way improvements in
accordance with FWCC ssection 22-1525 would be required at the time lot B is
improved.
15. Public Services:
As with all new development, the site will increase the demand for public
services. Normal use of the site is not expected to significantly effect existing
service levels of the City's Police and Fire Departments.
16. Utilities: Federal Way Water and Sewer indicate that water and sewer service is available
to lot B from mains located in South 311th Street. Connection would be through side
service installation.
C. Conclusion:
The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment
if appropriate conditions are properly implemented pursuant to a Mitigated DNS. Conditions
of the MDNS are based upon impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments,
and the above "FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST", and
are supported by Plans and regulations formally adopted by the City for the exercise of
substantive authority under SEPA. The City reserves the right to review any future revisions
or alterations to the site or to the proposal in order to determine the environmental significance
or non-significance of the project at that point in time.
Prepared by: Deb Barker. Planning Technician
Date: April 11, 1994
sepafile\wilsonev.wp
i
crnro' C 1 = 2
�] "/ 33530 First Way S3uth
��� �i "li Federal Way WA 98003
`� Phone (206) 6614000
Afr • (ffo'
Ct,42 RECEIVED BY
ENVIRONMENTAL cHEcKENTNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FEB 07 1994
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental
agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An
environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable
significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is
to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to
reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide
whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of
your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,
with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most
cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans
without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does
not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." complete answers to the
questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental
agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a
period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help
describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this
checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably
related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Use of Checklist for Non-project Proposals:
Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does
not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions (part D).
For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and
"property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,"
respectively.
I y
2
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
511
2. Name of applicant: (( � C ' {'Ctlit
` �
Wetrrek , L �., y RL5 V
3. Address and� phone number of applicant and contact person:
7,9 4` (/G Ao, Dr N/to
, W fi r( 7002 �.{ '
206, ? 3 ? 1► +I'
4. Date checklist prepared:
l a A-1 i `l' 41 3
5. Agency requesting checklist: 1 r
y 'v/i�I Der- 7-✓.can' l el �a' ' - '✓� h �e ve Iop
FPd�rvr-
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
AA
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
co�nnected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
�
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
NO AP
•
3
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
10. List any government approvals or pepnits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
. �;,\ tI pc,ro-V'IA41
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. \\ I I 1
5w .ba,v e Le f I ) Block; 4, s-f- e I Lair e re'
•
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township,
and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and
topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by
the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any
permit applications related to this checklist.
3110 5— 28 1, /Tv ,
•
$
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one): of ing hilly, steep slopes,
P drib
mountainous, other.
d‘P
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
87,
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
prime farmland.
Sated xT r: ,e )
Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If
so, describe.
e.e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
- N p^6.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
No
5
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project ,/
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
464D D �
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any.
freA-77)---f
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is
completed? I11f any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. .t,
A(0rr'&( v� D� �/� VIs2 Co�f+Tu.c_�
•
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If .-�
so, generally describe.
o
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. O_'
6
3. WATER
a. Surface.
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If
yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river
it flows into.
0 54-62L
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. ,
No
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be
affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general,
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No
(5';', Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
N
7
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If
s'o, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
ih
b. Ground.
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? 6\--"
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
/
ey-- -(
6, (,(214 S e timi , i t/0,-eic-o,-- -i--
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks
or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
dpL\U following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,
the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or
Yet/ the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
, 4f--;(i
r '' '-- - 4 ) 4,14....-- itit)ik
Vitrli
C. Water Runoff (including storm water).
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and
1 disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will
\' )'
this water flow into other waters?' If so, describ/e.
5-1
r / 1hei o5 , , .zr i , r - 0v � '� 4ke S� A 0�j
` i
,
8
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
N0
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any.
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle typesvegetation of found on the site. V
t$ deciduous tr=:sW2) maple aspen, other
IN evergreen tree4 c-•ar,:pine, other
la shrubs ' grass 0 pasture ❑ crop or grain
❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
❑ water plant: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation ci c.o.e 5 'tars s
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ✓
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
IJal' "
•
I
9
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any.
�wa e• c S
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site.
it • hawk, heron, eagl, songbirds other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, •eaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
/ ane
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
/Jo
J
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any.
n/�
10
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
A/orr I 11 ^ ye 1 i q } n
L
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If
so, generally describe.
(/o
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measuresa to reduce or controlt energy impacts, if any.
We M/ Col\14
(T�� w: )I f o! )0 co A e. t, ;;P beiA I
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health ha'ards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this
proposal? If so, describe.
No .
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
•
11
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any.
n/A
b. Noise.
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment operation, other)?
N�� P _fry-a*G �-� 26 Sv .
4
/2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project
on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, V/r
other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
/V o r M. k ` con r'-n.k t'i',b n n e j e f
Ori
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any.
eJo.
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Rps r CPS Onr) )ex )7"
12
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
A/o
c. Describe any structures on the site.One ko•tife a+\ A SLeA
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
e � tc Val l a t /1, ` "` -tr-c- ?
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
� S 7. Z
at is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
f. ?
3R___ i
, _
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N7d
13
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,�� /
specify. r/
N
•
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
70 �;
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any.
r /a
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land ,-
uses and plans, if any. �/'
Cpn DrY1\ "b ZD0.i of reQv. ^ % NI,o✓ r
i I
Y
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
/ Mrd ell
�
l !Let
(///ju"C/ 1 1`'iC
•
14
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
•
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any.
•
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is/
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
or✓
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
on'e
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any.
h/0,
•
15
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it-7/
mainly occur?
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
N0
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
N/'
ohe
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light andglare impacts, if any.
po g P Y
tA
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
S"7r.e Lti k e 1)Ar*
16
b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
N o v'
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any.
/D)
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any.places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local •
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. L/
N
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific,!"/
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
N r)11
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any.
•
17
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to
the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
2F+ Pm e S.. , el, dI.jar-eni.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance
to the nearest transit stop?
•
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would theme ,,
project eliminate?
N ot.e C( d./Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads
or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate hether public
or private). Vtup r.eic tiviock .
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
o
18
f. ' How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
7wa -R-►‘'; I i es
•
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any.
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
el/�
19
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle utilities curre available at the site: electrici natural gas, ate Tus
servic , telephone nary seweEAeptic system, o er (please list).
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which
might be needed.
Cr* aC Fe e ra ) -t.� ►�A' e r f�a� 4 f r we r
�0.�rtl Pe y � �� Q 1 e C / r�l a� ISO w CT
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted: j AT A I( c
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the
list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the proposal, of the types of activities likely to
result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if
the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage or release of toxic of hazardous substances; or production of noise?
/ v 0
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
r /a
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
fie rP
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
n /a
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy of natural resources?
AloAr
Proposed measures to protect of conserve energy and natural resources are:
A
70
SAD
f
2,A3
2 (0 f-o
t146 ( 70
5
3�0
( 2 leo
/oho
750
( Z
C.. �v
��r
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FILE
MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
FILE NUMBER: SEP-94-0003, SPL-94-0001
Description of Proposal: Subdivision of an existing 14,560 sq.ft residential lot into two
7,280 sq.ft residential lots, one with an existing structure..
Proponent: William Wilson
Location: 31105 - 28th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following Findings of
Fact based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist and the "Final Staff Evaluation
for Environmental Checklist; Application No: SEP-94-0003" and Conclusions of Law based
upon the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and
regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State
Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to R.C.W. 43.21C.060.
Findings of Fact:
1. The "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Application No: SEP-94-0003
is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.
2. The proposed action is to sub-divide lot 1, block 4 of the plat of Steel Lake Terrace into
two 7,280 sq. ft single family residential lots.
3. There is an existing residence on the eastern portion of proposed lot A.
4. An existing shed will be relocated or demolished to conform to City code requirements.
5. The City short plat process requires implementation of adopted road standards. The
proposed short plat fronts two public roads that do not meet current road improvement
standards. With associated improvements, the project has the potential of creating more
than 5000 square feet of impervious surface.
6. The site is located in the Central Puget Sound Sub-Basin Planning area which
recommends storm drainage enhancements to adequately mitigate effects of development
on water quality, flooding, and downstream erosion.
Conclusions of Law:
1. Allow residential development only when supported concurrently by adequate services
including roads, utilities, transit, parks, recreation, schools, fire and police (policy H-4,
FWCP).
2. Establish regulatory measures to prevent flooding (policy NE-17, FWCP).
4. Assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive, aesthetically and
culturally pleasing surrounding (policy 10.230.20(2) Federal Way Environmental Policy
Ordinance).
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposed action does not have
probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not required under R.C.W. 43.21C.032(2)(c), only if the following conditions are met.
This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
Condition:
1. If the project creates more than 5000 square feet of impervious surfaces, the applicant
shall provide on-site storm water runoff control in accordance with recommendation BW-
2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan.
This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on April 27,
1994.
Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment
deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the
City within 14 days of the above comment deadline.
Staff Contact Person: Deb Barker, Planning Technician, (206) 661-4103
Responsible Official: Gregory D. Moore, AICP
Position/Title: Director of Community Development Services
Address: 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Date issued: April 12, 1994 Signature: t J.
SEPAFILE\\wilsnfac.ntc
s
! G:i . , „, VICINITY MAP'
z h T=$
t I
1
= 4 . V'"1 STn°P',6w t y� I � i I z - - tl J'i
t 0
W 5 -Lau,. I +TM rT�
}a
Ixa.,trPw K t& ]p971,_killi.4101.4,.4.. i,,,4iiii i , ,; < A T 1°s aerH Pl p4 Z o y r I _
®'T fw d Na 300/1 eJ { E R B WM ,;T�199TM ST o5 D9THP ItiNp 3 0 ty0 e[ �` ppe q aJ 3
-
fT 30zxo sr 1 S]013T E�""rs 701- R s7oorH .. ol^ PI `'/ / It�vop 1� a e/ gFI —�
so Ofi < NO 33°13T P'" •Q13 3702ND fT ' `>`� I 0 /z°pay //pi /o]y po�9
9 303■0 ST 1 �- e0 7gV7 74r -o° 74. /ze
302
2 ifi '�' �` o y ��ter Re' I sr 40�° °I� �'k � CO 310 TI I S - �tts;.°•;[•n W 31.4 N -
0.
�, • !, �lTN 5 I v5 ; 7a to�� 7o ry
■ i —2b7re ! �� O o° tw �� 6 5 d 1
FEDERAL•v[ - �0 .. of \ /u lJ
d S 308TH`� ST f 1 °a �/ ° v . Q
sr �.> ' SO 5�`309TH'. I �s x5 6, ' a 0 ,o° d .
ii
I a to ,,��yy w ST c ey 1 u ,00 o° 0
sawn, ! BIOTe ST ¢ > 5 31 Tx ST tr o ,'. ly tt, ,. 5 .5 r co
Zil
K,: ¢• Q xtQ o .Sp 74./7 v of ti 0° - y —'
;"e Nak i 4 311rH £zn'S 9 °0 i, (V ^ ,
3I2TK` �6 }� asN .N�;\1Uriaw o \-/ t5 Iqo t 3
O G 3: I
i5r 313TrP � d!'S"Jilt ,fH r ° e ,r r
♦ °0 ': M d 0 9 o y 0. 1
oj°5 (/ q t5: + 0 1 It' o dr 4H Li
:::::40.7,,.:
W74.2/ 74 ..0 y' /eo otr W°p „ SO Jll•TII ."i7: >�•;03s ° _ —
• eSITE LOCATION :::48..,:s:
0® Erallif
0N
So 0} 303e ae -
- - . QtnSEWN. .rs.cCTR7'4IG'OW[OPAIVI EAJER[NT
.. 4n.o 4,..,S 311 ST. _ -- or,/
N 89°30.33`W r]i. wt.r -` 1,-
--
.-- 976.22 '^ct
` .4•e:_..
o
•
.a.e ,.; •
o.
e 0• r...r v,ta r..t 0a
•
4, w`
rui •
rt« Q
•G I L� t"
' _ i• ••'Fir. ...
r Y)o.c
A
ui 4 r1 N
•. yna
•
os
Cot
/Oy.00 a.l _ „. Al
i7]
••
/09.0. •
vss.e
V on.r -
•
5 is e e l "-a l�1YK // .vtr. /oww0 f•tRo./PrPf Wl
rAC„. Fawa w r/s'arbl4
,Si,...o3 I Of As.
POPE.
SEP 94-0003, SPL 94-0001
LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Warren T.Lay N , Wilson Short Plat
Thle Short Plat correctly npneents o survey mad.by tt�t...wit.r sw..c.. .tjrP aµy'-4('yj
me or ands my dIto.o n „ aafarrrtana. d C ,he r a ` 31105 - 28th Avenue SW
requirement• of the appropriate Stale and Clty I
Statute and Ordlnanu M AfJG., a■.9.3.. 1 11
^{�/,a I. Federal Way, WA
•.'' �- 70a Crd.r stirs `wfL tool'
... ... nre.,.,wn oeoo]
c.runeate No. L...4.29 e3ietr9 ♦e....r>_-raa
92 - I.
Maynard
2613 S 311th
Federal Way WA. 98003
r
29:1714
Raymond A&Isabel Mortimer
31025 26th Ave S.
Federal Way WA.99003
Bette J. Leighton
31033 26th Ave S.
Federal Way WA. 98003
cn
t)
ti M M M
p N O MO O 0 O
00O cii O
N oo cc °\ 00 00 0 co
•
CD 0
3 � �
�~' M
N3 M M �M 03y .
WNI _
PO '0VD N N NO N O
VD FS!
O W �i N W N W N W ' o W
it
en Cr) o
00 00 bA 0 0 0
0 ON O� N 00 000 000
xg. 3 o -
" o g
N3 4M3 - M wc Vc
.t7 M .� x M Q M
0 •4 N 0 N E)
0 M w \0 0 ysa VD 0 ON N 0 M N
W N w t'� c•1 w '� c o o
‹ Nw V) NW
![` M
N
M O O
M
O CD ON - O\ CA 0
cs Fr "CS Mpo
O •y '--I a)Ono ZMW •
WMW pQMW N
44 cf.) W PL N W
L N
cn
M O M
O O C
00 cc) CT
Vj
(NICT
• 0 N0 4, A � o 3
Mw CD a M wW i A
N
E
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION OF ENVIRONME NT L MITIGATED
DETERMINATION
OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Federal Way,Washington
No. 100
Application No:SEP-94-0003,
SPL-94-0001
The City of Federal Way has deter-
STATE OF WASHINGTON) mined that the following project does
COUNTY OF KING )ss. not have a probable significant adver-
se impact on the environment,and an
I,Craig Dennis,being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)
That he is the Publisher of The Federal Way News,a tri-weekly is not required under RCW
newspaper which is now and at all times herein mentioned has 43.21 C.030(2)(c).This decision was
been published and printed in an office maintained at the place of made after review of a completed en-
publication at Federal Way,King County,Washington,that by
en-
vironmental checklist and other infor-
order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for Proposedopo o file with the City.
KingCounty,said newspaper is now and at all times mentioned Action: of Subdivisione of lot 1-
Yblock 4 of the plat of Steel Lake Ter-
herein has been approved as a legal newspaper for the publication race into two 7,280 square foot
of any advertisement,notice, summons,report,proceedings, or residential lots.
other official document required by law to be published,that said Applicant Wiliam Wilson
newspaper was published regularly at least once each week,in the Location:31105-28th Avenue South.
English language, as a newspaper of general circulation in Mitigation Measures(Summary):
Federal Way, King County, Washington, at the time of If the project creates more than 5000
application to the aforementioned Superior Court for approval as square feet of impervious surfaces,the
a legal newspaper, and was so published for at least six months applicant shall provide on-site storm
water runoff control in accordance with
prior to the date of said publication,and is now and at all times
recommendation BW-2 of the Hylebos
mentioned herein has been so published. Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin
That the annexed is a true copy of a Notice by the City Plan. •
of Federal Way of Environmental Determination of Non- Further information regarding this ac-
significance on proposed subdivision of lot 1 block 4 of the plat tion is available to the public upon re-
of Steel Lake Terrace into two residential lots,Application Nos. quest at the Federal Way Department
SEP-94-0003,SPL-94-0001 of Community Development, Federal
Way City Hall,33530 First Way South,
Federal Way, WA, 98003, Contact:
as it was published in regular issues of said newspapers once each Deb Barker, Planning Technician
Phone: (206) 661-4103. This MDNS is
week for a issued under WAC 197-11-340(2).
period of one consecutive week(s), commencing Comments must be submitted by 5:00
p.m.on April 27,1994.
on the 12th day of April , 1994,and ending Unless modified by the City,this deter-
mination will become final following the
on the 12th day of April , 1994,both dates comment deadline. Any person ag-
grieved by the City's determination
inclusive,and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its may file an appeal with the City within
4 days of the above comment
subscribers and as a newspaper of general circulation during all deadline.
of said period. Published in the Federal Way News
on April 12,1994.
That the full amount of the fee charged for the 100
foregoin pu licalion i t m of$ 43.06 .
Subscrib and sworn to before me this 14th day
of Aril , 1994.
,P,hG�G f go 0 RECEIVED
Notarylic in and for t e State o ashin on
gt
Residing at Battle. My comnu ton expires 5/30/95. A c j
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
f
AFFI AVIT OF DISI RIB TION
i 4`7 herebydeclare, under penalty
P Y
of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that:
❑ Notice of Public Hearing ❑ Determination of Non-Significance
❑ Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non-
Significance
❑ Board of Adjustment Agenda ❑ Determination of Non-Significance
Packet and Scoping Notice
❑ Planning Commission Agenda ❑ Notice of Action
Packet
❑ Short Subdivision Agenda ❑ Official Notice
Packet
❑ Notice of Application for ❑ Other
Shoreline Management Permit
❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Other
was mailed/fax osted o/at each of the following addresses (see attached list)
(0) Ci;le /let-elf Tr— 370Li'l
tbra c , /o)t z I`fa,v
///knA L 10-)--r Rae-
Name of Project Signatures
File Number 5eP f-6603, Date / �''
AFFIDAvt.FRM
REVISED 12/31/92
r
r
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
FILE NUMBER: SEP-94-0003, SPL-94-0001
Description of Proposal: Subdivision of an existing 14,560 sq.ft residential lot into two
7,280 sq.ft residential lots, one with an existing structure..
Proponent: William Wilson
Location: 31105 - 28th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following Findings of
Fact based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist and the "Final Staff Evaluation
for Environmental Checklist; Application No: SEP-94-0003" and Conclusions of Law based
upon the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and
regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State
Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to R.C.W. 43.21C.060.
Findings of Fact:
1. The "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Application No: SEP-94-0003
is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.
2. The proposed action is to sub-divide lot 1, block 4 of the plat of Steel Lake Terrace into
two 7,280 sq. ft single family residential lots.
3. There is an existing residence on the eastern portion of proposed lot A.
4. An existing shed will be relocated or demolished to conform to City code requirements.
5. The City short plat process requires implementation of adopted road standards. The
proposed short plat fronts two public roads that do not meet current road improvement
standards. With associated improvements, the project has the potential of creating more
than 5000 square feet of impervious surface.
6. The site is located in the Central Puget Sound Sub-Basin Planning area which
recommends storm drainage enhancements to adequately mitigate effects of development
on water quality, flooding, and downstream erosion.
Conclusions of Law:
1. Allow residential development only when supported concurrently by adequate services
including roads, utilities, transit, parks, recreation, schools, fire and police (policy H-4,
FWCP).
r �
2. Establish regulatory measures to prevent flooding (policy NE-17, FWCP).
4. Assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive, aesthetically and
culturally pleasing surrounding (policy 10.230.20(2) Federal Way Environmental Policy
Ordinance).
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposed action does not have
probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not required under R.C.W. 43.21C.032(2)(c), only if the following conditions are met.
This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
Condition:
1. If the project creates more than 5000 square feet of impervious surfaces, the applicant
shall provide on-site storm water runoff control in accordance with recommendation BW-
2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan.
This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on April 27.
1994.
Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment
deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the
City within 14 days of the above comment deadline.
Staff Contact Person: Deb Barker, Planning Technician, (206) 661-4103
Responsible Official: Gregory D. Moore, AICP
Position/Title: Director of Community Development Services
Address: 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Date issued: April 12. 1994 Signature: tO.
SEPAF LE\\wilsnfac.ntc
r 41
•
•
e I_
.......•
g ~"` =Ta ''` VICINITY MAP'
t= L `.Ju 1�
gTp •• r I
• _ P,. I LT ,. 1. 4t I ii{. p M e,i
0 lal 1 O - ' „.,
VA 1 ' ' I I ® r 1 f;
g61H Q > � _ �� � i4
.,.� p, ' 5 Vt9•rM PL
° �.®E� tllf .`new, > _ TN _�_...� —--jam{
41
8A A1RC
y -rill'
` ssvvn, < "'s mrHP • ' °o 3 C 1 do __
®®® NS ® t79TH n I N Z o0
P r „ s oorq't > ..1 5 S9TH P ��t 3, p 9 0°5 (, °5 al s__
>D t �. R1ST ro 115 It d ,°
sZ .,ss w 5 71�JST dY?"`s>DI R s sooTH� •
o` IL �I� f i O •1 •o°B 'Rt
s n -` aao3 oars z, 5,30114T ¢'- c s'so711o1T-:1,EE<a`, .. i 1 0 0Op 1,ss 11 ° �l° oh 5 4�
,1,— sso PL' k tn° q: 7R,z 7fr°� -o° 7f f:oo .L —_y ,. '.11b L ek. rr �rIF JOl • �S , W l
''S 4+. 5 s' 1 w ,. �''�+• n'v. -cl I— Y• ^� C7.07. 310 TI I S;--�Lrn s<-n' m p &a—
9 m p`
='1'p' s 3 s. I r I '\ .,N 1,!5 7a,1`(� - ra .:e.
+1 .i v , As 1 STeeY—Lake` " `.?�� (Do t i l' 6 5 a f M ti
p FfOERAI•.11 14,
M S 3081H c.0 377$t�4' • ST 1 1. 1� B \J o ps Q ;
sT�� 3 �Y' ""`N S i 309TIi I i \ te° 6: a B,yO �p .
salOfH$ o".e ' $ 610 d t-a > ` sS>10T"ST I o r• o`°Y = d'p,'✓ �" ,,:�o +�S ,�)°°, �pt9� 2`
IAXf Za' y�4 � F" 7A/7 M o' 0` ° °ors _ b '
n • 0 '7 -c s 1 311xH , t iro° : ,p 1 N a,
fi �i2 FC`� N tM �°T`N l e0 N t 3 o j, 1
I� 3tin7�a�"y73. '� ''�; z .`�<,�.,: s s1TTH s7 0' O•
1dA
00 w 0 0 ,1•'
.n •St,s ,i 2 0 leeti9 +`o° 't.00 ` 4 ,o0 J
o', tJ °' ,2°i1- /ieIo�Yh 9d'0 T 45N
(� ' 774 ••07f /Pool9 / 0°9. 00'� W SO3FITil -'�+�. oSG.El�•'� °SITE LOCATION °�0 Lozl Os 41't 050N '� 2 Ir,i�yUMW-
So v,„ !e Ile ?ea.2L Ae{: !o
_
•l • Y co,N0R7H —.44...4444.44.4••\,eam.--
I CTNl1A io'w,06 OQANI A'Asenfor
.- Wlu A YNI v1
S 311 SST. o
AIW rl 89.30.3 '' r e /
976.22 4,r,
iP
nil WI
n.. W
tog.i0.
. v1f.0 r�Yrr
V1al 10 P•+
.�« w,b� a)aL•
coal
C . t YiO.L CO
• B141.1 1 A
(�
-L 41L„
•
h
i
_ �� rl•i 1 r,w .lar �.
rat of
I VR)
o/ •' 7oq..00'u \ 'Val •
/OY.p
-----N 89_3 O_32"W---------
�� •Vic.
i rri.r
5 eeI make Parkj'// .L f0LNO I.(Roe Wa
r,401 Few,A dr'Q•Oft
,sla An Ott OF F0✓NO
F,/F.
SEP 94-000�3, SPL 94-0001
LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Warren T.LayN T• Wilson Short Plat
This Short Plat corr•oUy r•prumt•o•urny mad.by War:^ r.-
s `F
mr or under mo dthe a n o foe Smanu dllh lha ` " :r;), � 31105 - 28th Avenue SW
nqukemenG of the approprloh State and City
•
Slott/t• and Or-d�lna`nc• In AVG.., 19.9�... 1.
IY
- g le.C.a..,:7Qii ► � Federal Way, WA
I.
A Aubu.n,wn 9900r
Cwtlfleal•No. �.Q.�9 ess.I lry —s rL-t-ci
1
•
AFFIL-VIT OF DISTRIb v.TION
`e-I- ' hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the
laws of the State of Washington, that:
❑ Notice of Application ❑ Notice of Proposed Land Use Action
❑ Notice of Action ❑ Notice of Public Meeting
❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline ❑ Notice of Public Land Use Hearing
Management Permit
❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Shoreline Management Permit
❑ Notice of Determination of Non- ❑ Official Notice
Significance and Scoping Notice
❑Notice of Environmental Determination DOther
of Non-Significance (SEPA)
12 I otice of Environmental Mitigated ❑Other
Determination of Non-Significance
(SEPA)
wa mailed ') faxed / posted to/at each of following addresses (see attached list) on
i 2 , 1994.
j '� 7A2 File Number(s) sc' rPro'ect Name C �� a� �„ . , , �tJ�-(;c�-,_�
Signature Date /,/ s st
AFFIDAvt.Doc
REVISED 2/25/94
SEPA COORDINATOR
DEPT OF ECOLOGY FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIST FED WAY WATER & SEWER
CENTRAL PROGRAM ATTN RICH HARRIS/SUPT PO BOX 4249
PO BOX 47703 31405 18TH AVENUE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
FED WAY FIRE DIST #39 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE MORNING NEWS TRIBUNE
316 1ST AVENUE SOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT 32050 23RD SOUTH
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 39015 172ND AVENUE SE FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
AUBURN WA 98002
FEDERAL WAY NEWS STEEL LK RESIDENTS ASSN
ATTN: SEAN ROBINSON 2329 SOUTH 304TH STREET
1634 SOUTH 312TH STREET FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
• AFFILAVIT OF DISTRlh cJTION
I I -Re.ti hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the
laws of the State of Washington, that:
❑ Notice of Application 0 Notice of Proposed Land Use Action
❑ Notice of Action 0 Notice of Public Meeting
❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline 0 Notice of Public Land Use Hearing
Management Permit
❑ Notice of Determination of Significance 0 Shoreline Management Permit
❑ Notice of Determination of Non- 0 Official Notice
Significance and Scoping Notice
❑Notice of Environmental Determination ❑Other
of Non-Significance (SEPA)
Er-Notice of Environmental Mitigated ❑Other
Determination of Non-Significance
(SEPA)
was mailed faxed / sted to/at each of following addresses (see attached list) on
4-1-1- s , 1994.
Project Name C`('it-SON -S 'F Pz 1- File Number(s)56)I V-cr,,.2
SfL ` tl <cct
Signature r ,J Date l - S `i
AFPIDAVI.DOC
REVISED 2/25/94
CITY OK ,
v".> ^ ' 336410 1 HT WAY mOUTN . PH ONE L WAY. WASH I imarrcr N oaooa
Mayor Co<tnoli Members
Mary E. flrtta
Ram H M BYdir
eos
City Manager Mahlon "'Sdyd "Preen
2Crnnrth Jr. Arybsrp Jtobrrr Strad
Ray Temtt...rrean
Phil Wat)dnr
FAX TRANSMITTAL 1 1%Ic I ANDUM
TC): ° ao DATE:
PAX #:
? t 4PER OF PA.C9EitS
(Including Memo Shoot):
PROM: J -
CDPFICE C7P:
�72l7iC/S� Oar �q +{ -C�r�t S r9�r�_rer . /
Q
If Mato ere soy problems duties trr`mte.ioa.
plaaae esll 661-4000 and sate il5r
oamssrAX.Aai[
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT ( REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE)
WAS SENT
** COUNT
# 2
*** SEND ***
NO REMOTE STATION I. D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES I COMMENT
1 241 2788 4- 8-94 1 :27PM 2 ' 30" 2
TOTAL 0:02 ' 30" 2
XEROX TELECOPIER 7020
NOTICE
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATED
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Federal Way, Washington
Application No: SEP-94-0003, SPL-94-0001
The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environment Impact Statement (EIS) is
not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the City.
Proposed Action: Subdivision of lot 1, block 4 of the plat of Steel Lake Terrace into two 7,280
square foot residential lots.
Applicant: William Wilson
Location: 31105-28th Avenue South
Mitigation Measures (Summary):
If the project creates more than 5000 square feet of impervious surfaces, the applicant shall
provide on-site storm water runoff control in accordance with recommendation BW-2 of the
Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan.
Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal
Way Department of Community Development, Federal Way City Hall, 33530 First Way South,
Federal Way, WA, 98003, Contact: Deb Barker, Planning Technician Phone: (206) 661-4103.
This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.
on April 27 1994 .
Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment
deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may file an appeal with the City
within 14 days of the above comment deadline.
Published in the Federal Way News on April 12. 1994.
sepafile\wilsnmdn.ntc
4 1►
CRY OF
vV PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Deb Barker
FROM: Jeffrey H. Sharp For Your Information
DATE: February 28, 1994
SUBJECT: Wilson Short Plat File No.: SEP 94 "I ii'V'C'C13
After reviewing the materials submitted the following comments and findings address SEPA
related issues.
Runoff: As with all paved, developed areas, the sites will contribute some pollutants to
ground and surface waters as these will be washed off by storm drainage across the site.
Pollutants which accumulate on paved surfaces include heavy metals, petrochemicals and
other substances. Some of these pollutants could be separated out of the storm water runoff
n
tors in the on-site catch basins
or
lined biofiltrationt, by installing oil/water swales to transport runoff off site or into on-site detention/retention
grass-
,
P
ponds/tanks.
Lki
- fF.
Provide storm water drainage improvements applicable under the 1992 King County Surface
Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), including surface water detention, biofiltration, and
oil/water separation. The proposed project must be designed to comply with all applicable
Core and Special Requirements outlined in the KCSWDM.
The site is located in the West Branch Hylebos Creek Sub-Basin, as identified in the Hylebos
Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan. The plan recommends storm drainage
enhancements to adequately mitigate the effects of development on water quality, flooding,
and downstream erosion. Specifically, basin wide recommendation BW-2 calls for the use of
the 2-year and 10-year 7-day rainfall events for sizing the required detention facilities for the
development, as opposed to the standard 2-year and 10-year 24-hour events. In addition the
BW-2 plans uses a modified time of concentration that utilizes interflow. The standard
thirty percent factor of safety is not required.
Comments related to the checklist sections A and B.1. through B.7.:
1. Section A.7. The applicant indicates there are no future activities connected with the
proposed short plat. If no future building activity is proposed, why is the applicant
PP\.doc
I 1
short platting?
2/ Section A.10. City review and approval of the short plat is required. ,In the future
building permits will be required to construct SFR's. /z /` r-7%
Section B.1.g. Applicant shall make a reasonable estimate of impervious areaNc._ /
percentages. /2,r ; ( %l
. Section B.1.h. Applicant shall address future building activity. /(- /_4 f
Section B.2.a. Applicant shall address whether future buildings will have fire places,
ood stoves or gas appliances. (( xt/t-'�
6. Section B.3.b.2. Does not note that future buildings with an on-site sewage disposal
systems (septic tanks) will discharge additional domestic sewage into the ground.
7. Section B.3.c.1. Applicant does not note that runoff will occur from future buildings,
-- driveways, patios and other impervious surfaces.
Section B.3.c.2. Future driveways and traffic will discharge oils, grease, antifreeze
and metals.
9. ) Section B.3.d. Has not been addressed.
XO. Section B.6.a. Shall be revised to address kind of energy that will be used.
Section B.7.b.2. Shall be revised to address future building activity, both short and
long-term.default file
PP\.doc
From: JULIE VENN
To: DebB
Date: Tuesday, August 29, 1995 3 : 10 pm
Subject: Wilson Short Plat
Would you please resurrect the MDNS for this Project -
SEP94-0003? The surveyor has finally resubmitted the corrected
short plat map and I am trying to catch up and was unable to find
the Public Works file. A copy of the short plat is in your in box
along with a letter from Ron granting a modification on the
street improvements. So there you have it. Hope your daysssss
off were fun.
"RAVERSE PC Date:8-13-1993 Time:9:29 F :\TPC20\RENAX ST.TRV
Survey: Rerdax/Steel
Traverse: Total Parcel w Curve
DF=1.000000000
Pt Bearing HorizDi Radius Arc Delta Northing Eastinq Description
7 972.04028 761.87697 NW Lot B
S Ox15'061 70.000
8 902.04096 761.56950 SW Lot B
S139x30'32°E 208.000
10 900.25811 969.56186 SE Lot A
N Ox15'06"E 45.100
PC 13 945.35767 969.75996 PC
N44x37'431 35.281 25.000 39.165 89x45'38°
PT 14 970.46656 944.97449
N89x30'21°W 79.104
12 971.14886 865.87315 N Lot B/Lot A
N89x30'3211 104.000
7 972.04028 761.87697 NW Lot B
TRAVERSE. PC File: C:: TPC:0 R:E:MAX s"F. TRV Date: 8-13;-- 199 Ti me: 9: 30
Traverse Total Parcel w Curve
ERROR SUMMARY: TRAVERSE SUMMARY:
Relative 1 : cr (0. 00) Closed Loop
Angular Hor i a:Di st: 545. 370 FT
Li near 0. 000 FT Si oppeDi st: `;415. 370 FT
*Northing 0..c 00 FT Points:
4 7
*Easting 0. 000 FT Area: 14426. 773 SOFT
*Elevation 0. 000 FT 0. :331 ACRES
*Bearing N ct.xoo '00"E
TRAVERSE ADJUSTMENTS:
* •from correct pt None
to closing pt.
Closing Points
Northing Easting Elevation
Initial Pt 7 972. 04028 '761 .1-3 7697 i.00
Closing Pt 7 972. 04028 761 . 87697 ii„ 0 i
Correct Pt 7 9'7 '. 04c}.E3 761. .87697 0„ 00
TRAVERSE PC Uate:B-13-1993 Time:9:31 R\e:C:\TPC20\REMAX ST,TRV
Survey: Re§ax/St»ei
Traverse: Lot A w Curve
0F=1,000000000
Pt Bearing HnrizDi Radius Arc Delta Northing [astiog Description
\O 900.25811 969.56I86 SE Lot A
N Ox\5'06"E 45.100
PC 13 945,35767 969.75996 PC
N44x37'43"W 35.281 25.000 39.165 89x45'38"
PT 14 970.46656 944.97449
N8900'211 79.104
12 771,14886 865.87315 N Lot D/Lut A
S Vxl5'06"W 70.000
9 901.14953 865,56568 S Lot 8/Lot A
S89x3A'32"[ 104,000
10 900,25811 969.56186 S[ Lot A
TRAVERSE PC File:C: \TPC20\REMAX ST. TRV Date: 8-13-1993 Time: 9: 32
Traverse Lot A w Curve
ERROR SUMMARY: TRAVERSE SUMMARY:
Relative 1 : 0 (0. 0O) Closed Loop
Angular HorizDist: 337. 370 FT
Linear 0. 000 FT SlopeDist: 337. 370 FT
*Northing 0. 000 FT Points: 6
*Easting 0. 000 FT Area: 7146. 836 SQFT
*Elevation 0. 000 FT 0. 164 ACRES
*Bearing N 0x00 '00''E
TRAVERSE ADJUSTMENTS:
* from correct pt None
to closing Pt
Closing Points
Northing Easting Elevation
Initial Pt 10 900. 25811 969. 56186 0.00
Closing Pt 10 900. 25811 969. 56186 0. 00
Correct Pt 1O 900. 25811 969. 56186 0.00
TRAVERSE PC Date:8-13-1993 Time:9:32 F :\\TPC20\REMAX ST.TRV
Survey: Remax/Steel
Traverse: Lot B
DF=1.000000000
Pt Bearing HorizDi Radius Arc Delta Northing Easting Description
7 972.04028 761.87697 NW Lot B
S Ox15'064 70.000
8 702.04096 761.56950 SW Lot B
S89x30121 104.000
9 901.14953 865.56568 S Lot 8/Lot A
N Ox15'06°E 70.000
12 771.14886 865.87315 N Lot 8/Lot A
N89x30'321 104.000
7 972.04028 761.87697 NW Lot B
TRAVERSE PC F]. l.e:C: \TPC2.O\REMAX ST. TRV Batt-,: 8-13-1993 Time: 9: -
Traverse Lot B
ERROR SUMMARY: TRAVERSE. SUMMARY:
Relative 1 : Cl (0..00) Closed Loot_,
Angular Foreiz1)ist: 348. 000 FT
Li near 0.000 FT Si opeDi tst: :348.000 FT
*Northing 0, 000 FT Points: 5
*Easting 0. 000 FT Area: 7279.936 SOFT
*Elevation 0. 000 FT 0. 167 ACRES
Bearing N 0.x0o '00"E
TRAVERSE ADJUSTMENTS:
from correct pt None
to closing pt
Closing Points
Northing Easting Elevation
Initial Pt 7 972.04028 761. . 87697 0.00
Closing Pt 7 972. 04028 761 . 87697 0. 00
Correct Ft 7 972. 04028 7 1 . E37697 0. 00
Case summary for Case No.: SEP94-0003 Date: 04/06/94
rSEPA DETERMINATION
:SEP94-0003: PROJECT:WILSON - SEPA : #: 3007: MASTER:PRE93-0043:
OWNER •WILLIAM G WILSON. STAT:P 04/06/94 DB
SITE ADDRESS:31105 28TH AVE S
f--PROJECT DESCRIPTION (1)
SEPA - SHORT PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4 OF THE PLAT OF STEEL LAKE TERRACE.
PROJECT LOCATION (2)
31105 - 28th Ave South, Federal Way, 98003
TYPE OF DETERM:MIT:
NON-PROJECT? •N•
STAFF •DB •
ISSUED...: / / :
F-NOTES (3)------
Short plat file number SPL94-0001
PgDn - More J
Memo field #1
SEPA - SHORT PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4 OF THE PLAT OF STEEL LAKE TERRACE.
Memo field #2
31105 - 28th Ave South, Federal Way, 98003
Memo field #3
Short plat file number SPL94-0001
Related cases in project group 3007
PRE93-0043 WARREN I LAY P.L.S.
SPL94-0001 WILLIAM G WILSON.
SEP94-0003 WILLIAM G WILSON.
Case sumnary for Case No.: SEP94-0003 Date: 04/06/94
r-SEPA DETERMINATION
:SEP94-0003: PROJECT:WILSON - SEPA : #: 3007: MASTER:PRE93-0043:
OWNER •WILLIAM G WILSON. STAT:P 04/06/94 DB
SITE ADDRESS:31105 28TH AVE S
F-PROJECT DESCRIPTION (1)
SEPA - SHORT PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4 OF THE PLAT OF STEEL LAKE TERRACE.
F-FINDINGS (4)
1. The "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist No. SEP-
94-0003" is hearby incorporated by rteference as though set forth in full.
2. The proposed action is to sub-divide lot 1, block 4 of the plat of
Steel Lake Terrace into two 7,280 sq,ft. single family residential lots.
F-CONCLUSIONS (5)
1. Allow residential development only when supported by adequate services
including roads, utilities, transit, parks, recreation, schools, file and
police (policy H-4, FWCP).
2. Establish regulatory measures to prevent flooding (policy NE-17, FWCP).
3. Assure for all people of Washingnton safe, healthful, productive,
PgDn - More J
Memo field #1
SEPA - SHORT PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4 OF THE PLAT OF STEEL LAKE TERRACE.
Memo field #2
31105 - 28th Ave South, Federal Way, 98003
Memo field #3
Short plat file number SPL94-0001
Case sumnary report completed
Names and addresses for project group 3007
PRE93-0043 APL SPL94-0001 APL
WARREN LAY P.L.S. WILLIAM WILSON.
704 CEDAR DR 5601 - 225TH ST SW
AUBURN WA 98002 MONTLAKE TERRACE WA 98043
PH: 833-1149 PH: 778-0442
SPL94-0001 AGT SEP94-0003 APL
SANDY BLONDELL WILLIAM WILSON.
PH: 838-2500 5601 - 225TH ST SW
MONTLAKE TERRACE WA 98043
PH: 778-0442
Actions for case no. SEP94-0003
Action Description Req/ Schd/ End/ Action Notes Disp By Update Upd
Code Sent Done Done Date By
---- --- -------- ---
SEPA010 Receive SEPA application / / / / 02/01/94 02/01/94 FLF - PLANS ROUTED TO PLANNING. 2PLN FLF 02/01/94 FLF
SEPA020 Log in and assign to planner / / / / 02/08/94 02/08/94 KM - Assigned to Deb Barker. DB KM 02/08/94 KM
SEPA030 CDRC meeting completed / / / / 02/24/94 comments received, Jeff saidf needs to OK DB 03/03/94 DB
be an MDNS due to Hylebois Plan
requirements
SEPA200 Review - Public Works / / 02/28/94 04/12/94 02/28/94 JS - Reviewed and comment on DONE JHS 04/06/94 DB
checklist. See doc file, "PWSEPA".
SEPA510 (F) Issue MDNS / / / / 04/12/94 MIT DB 04/06/94 DB
SEPA520 SEPA comment period expires / / 04/27/94 05/12/94 DB 04/06/94 DB
SEPA530 SEPA appeal period expires 04/06/94 04/06/94 05/05/94 04/06/94 DB
Conditions for case no. SEP94-0003
1) SPECIAL CONDITION-of approval -- If the project creates more than 5000 square feet of impervious
surfaces, the applicant shall provide on-site storm water runoff control in accordance with
recommendation BW-2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan.
Notes for case no. SEP94-0003
No notes found for this case
Fees for case no. SEP94-_ _ _3
Fee Fee Account Fee Amount Receipt Check
Description Type Number Amount Paid #
SEPA CKLST W/PRJ. .95 8022 001-0000-0000-034 450. 00 450.00 NONE 2480
5-0083-0001
FIRE CKLST W/Prj . .95 8022 ? 22 . 00 22 .00 NONE 2480
Total fees* $ 472.00 Balance due: . . $ 0.00
Parcels, attributes and covenants for project group 3007
PARCEL: 798440-0150
Street addresses:
31105 28TH AVE S
Parcel information:
PARCEL • 798440-0150
PR CITY. . . : FED
LEVY • 1205
OWN_NAME. . : LOCKHART ERNEST L
OWNADDR1. :
OWN__ADDR2 . :
OWN_CITY. . :
OWN STATE. :
OWN ZIP. . . :
KROLL •
QTR • NE
STR • 09-21-04
SIZE • 0
ZONING • RS7.2
COMPLAN. . . :
LAND USE. . : 101
CRET_DAT. . : / /
LEGLLOT. . :
SWR_DIST. . :
WTR_DIST. . :
CEN_TRCT. . :
SUB—NAME. . :
SUB_DIV. . . :
SUB_BLK. . . :
SUB LOT. . . :
DEDPRCL. . :
AV_LAND. . . : 27000
AVIMPRV. . : 57000
TAX • T
SQFT • -1
SENS • 7
CONFRM • 3
COMPLIES. . : 1
OCCUPANCY. : 2
BLDGAREAOK: 4
STORIES. . . : 9
LEGAL •
NOTES •
WARNING. . . : NO
PRPRCL. . . : NO
UPDATE • 06/25/92
UPDATEBY. . : DEA
Parcel attributes:
No attributes found for this parcel
Covenants:
No covenants found for this parcel
Case summary report completed