The URL can be used to link to this page

Council PKT 07-06-2004 Special/Regular ~ Federal Way City Council Meeting AGENDA COUNCILMEMBERS Dean McColgan, Mayor Jeanne Burbidge Jack Dovey Eric Faison Jim Ferrell Linda Kachmar Mike Park CITY MANAGER David H. Moseley Office of the City Clerk July 6, 2004 I. II. III. 1. II. III. IV. AGENDA FED ERAL WAY CITY CO UN CIL Council Chambers - City Hall July 6, 2004 (www.cityoffederalway.com) * * * * * SPECIAL MEETING - 6:15 p.m. CALL MEETING TO ORDER COMMUNITY CENTER/BADMINTON COURT ADJOURNMENT REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 p.m. CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PRESENT A TI ONS a. b. Introduction of New Employees/City Manager Emerging Issues/City Manager CITIZEN COMMENT PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. Citizens may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE (3) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long, relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate. Page 1 of 3 V. VI. VII. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought before full Council for approval; all items are enacted by one motion. Individual items may be removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion. a. b. Minutes/June 15, 2004 Regular Meeting Narcotics K-9 Ownership Agreement/W A State Patrol & FW Police Dept 2004 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Washington Conservation Corps Interlocal Agreement "Pray Federal Way" Event at Saghalie Park Jim Webster Memorial Field Grant Funding Application/Transportation Improvement Projects 2005 Street Sweeping Service/Authorization to Bid 2005 Landscape Maintenance Service/Authorization to Bid Bellacarino Woods Sewer Extension/Bid A ward Proposed Modification to Cottages at Hoyt Road/Preliminary Plat - Resolution Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration c. d. e. f. g. h. 1. J. k. 1. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan (2nd required public hearing) . Staff Report . Citizen Comment (3-minute limit) . Council Directive to Staff b. Disposal of Surplus City Property . Staff Report . Citizen Comment (3-minute limit) . Council Directive to Staff CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Seeking Voter Approval to Maintain Current Property Tax Rate in 2005 (Property Tax "Lid Lift") b. Retail/Commercial Market Study for City Center (Postponed from 6/15/04 Regular Meeting) c. Revised Parkway Annexation Boundary/Resolution Page 2 of 3 VII1. IX. X. XI. XII. INTRODUCTION ORDINANCES a. Council Bill #340/Proposed Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER EIGHT "POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SUBAREA PLAN" OF THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AMENDING CHAPTER TWO "LAND USE", AMENDING CHAPTER FOUR "ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT" AND REPEALILNG THE EXISTING CHAPTER EIGHT "POTENTIAL ANNEXA nON AREAS." b. Council Bill #341/Christian Faith Center Rezone & Agreement AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO LAND USE, ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMNT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNA TION AND ZONING FOR 49.97 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF s. 336TH STREET BETWEEN PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH AND INTERSTATE 5 FROM BUSINESS PARK (BP) TO MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 3600 (RM 3600), AND ADOPTING AN ASSOCIA TED CONCOMITANT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN. c. Council Bill #342/Comprehensive Plan Site Specific AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT EXECUTIVE SES SI ON Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) ADJOURNMENT ** THE COUNCIL MAY ADD AND TAKE ACTION ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA ** THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AND ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER "PUBLIC DOCUMENT LIBRARY" Page 3 of3 MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# ~ ~) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ..................................... ......................................................................... ATTACHMENTS: Draft minues of the City Council regular meeting held on June 15,2004. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for permanent records pursuant to RCW requirements. .................................................... .......................................... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: nla PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the minutes of the City Council regular meeting held on June 15,2004." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Couòcil Chambers Regular Meeting June 15, 2004 - 7:00 p.m. Minutes QR~f1 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor McColgan called the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at hour of 7 :00 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Dean McColgan, Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar, Councilmembers Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey, Eric Faison, Jim Ferrell, and Mike Park. Staff present: City Manager David Moseley, City Attorney Pat Richardson, and City Clerk Chris Green. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Police Chief Anne Kirkpatrick led the flag salute. III. PRESENTATIONS a. Planning Commission/Introduction & Certificate of Appointment (unexpired term) Councilmember Dovey introduced and presented a certificate of appointment to Merle Pfeifer, who is filling an unexpired term through September 2004. He thanked Mr. Pfeifer, who has been an alternate commissioner. b. Youth Commission/Appreciation Plaques (outgoing commissioners) Councilmember Burbidge expressed her gratitude to the Youth Commission for the many programs they put together, including the Youth Talent Show, the Battle of the Bands, and the Youth Recognition Night. She asked outgoing Commissioners Caitlin Johnson, Kelsey Martin, John Tavares, Kelsey Tyler, and Elise Vaughan to come forward as Mayor McColgan presents them with a plaque in appreciation for their service on the Youth Commission. c. Introduction of New Employees/City Manager City Manager David Moseley announced there were no new employees to introduce. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 15, 2004- Page 2 of 7 d. Emerging Issues/City Manager City Manager David Moseley announced there were no emerging issues to discuss. IV. CITIZEN COMMENT William Pearson, a resident of 18th Place So., spoke in opposition to opening and widening their neighborhood street for the Christian Faith Center. Florence pearson¡j (comments read into the record by City Clerk) stated the neighborhood would accept 18t Place So, being opened under specific conditions, as discussed with Traffic Engineer Rick Perez. The letter was signed in agreement by the residents of the street. Lee Bedand, announced the opening day of the Federal Way Farmer's Market would be Saturday, June 19th and run through October 30th. She encouraged everyone to attend the Market that is located in the West parking lot of Sears adjacent to Washington Mutual Bank. Sharon Fishier, spoke in support of the Christian Faith Center project, as a homeowner on 18th Place So., she noted a church is a much better fit than a business park. Juliet Sykes, spoke in opposition to the Christian Faith Center, however noting due the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) she felt the city has no other choice than to approve the project. T.J.Mason, resident of 18th Place So, spoke in opposition to opening his neighborhood street, he also added he recently purchased the house, and was not aware of the pending project. Maryfaye Phillips, resident of 18th Place So., spoke in opposition to th~ opening of the neighborhood street due to the amount of the children in the area, and increased traffic. Morgan Llewellyn, spoke in support of the Christian Faith Center project, and noted he agreed with the staff report and the market, economic, wetland and traffic studies. He urged the Council to end the five-year process and approve the project and expedite the permits. Kim Hoffman, resident of 18th Place So., spoke in opposition to the Christian Faith Center project and against opening her dead-end street. She also questioned when her property was rezoned and what the notification procedures are when properties are being rezoned. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 15, 2004- Page 3 of 7 Kelly Wheeler, resident of 18th Place So., asked the Council to not open his neighborhood road, he was concerned the increased traffic wouldn't allow him to play outside his house and in his own neighborhood. v. CONSENT AGENDA Minutes/June 1, 2004 Re!Wlar Meeting -Approved \Touchers-Alpproved April 2004 Monthly Financial Report-Approved Kikaha O'Ke Kai Outrigger Canoe Club/Memorandum of Understanding- Alpproved Regional Solid Waste Issues-Approved Interlocal Cooperative Agreement/The Administrative Office of the Courts-Pulled and Approved Separately a. b. c. d. e. f. Councilmember Ferrell pulled item Administrative Office of the Courts. ( t)/Interlocal Cooperative Agreement/The DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR MOVED APPROV AL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (a), (b), (c), (d), AND (e) AS PRESENTED; SECOND MADE BY COUNCILMEMEBR DOVEY. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Item (f)/Interlocal Cooperative Agreement/The Administrative Office of the Courts: Councilmember Ferrell noted he would recuse himself from this vote as a family member works for the Administrative Office of the Courts. COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED APPROVAL OF THE INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT/THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed 6-0 as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes recused Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 15, 2004- Page 4 of 7 VI. PUBLIC HEARING (continued from May 24,2004) Christian Faith Center Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM3600) and Associated Development Agreement and Development Plan Mayor McColgan read into record the procedures to be followed for the hearing and opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. . Council Discussion/Decision Public Works Director Carr Roe, Community Development Director Kathy McClung, Management Services Director lwen Wang, Community Development Senior Planner Lori Michaelson, and Christian Faith Center Representative Morgan Llewellyn responded to various Council inquiries regarding this project. MOTION MADE BY COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY TO DIRECT CITY STAFF TO DRAFT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND D EVELO PMENT PLAN IN CO RPO RA TIN G THE STAFF REPORT, AND THE FACTORS ADDRESSED BY COUNCIL THIS EVENING FOR FIRST READING AT THE JULY 6, 2004 COUNCIL MEETING; HE FURTHER MOVED AFTER THE SECOND READING ON JULY 20, 2004, PROVIDED THAT CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER EXECUTES A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; SECOND MADE BY COUNCILMEMBER PARK. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes There being nothing further to discuss, Mayor McColgan closed the public hearing at 8:53 p.m. The Council took a brief recess at 8:53 p.m., and returned to Chambers at 9:05 p.m. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 15, 2004- Page 5 of 7 VII. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Retail/Commercial Market Study for City Center Patrick Doherty, Deputy Director of Community Development - Economic Development gave a brief report on this item. Councilmembers expressed the need to postpone this item to the next Council meeting to further research and receive additional information for various other sources. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED TO TABLE (POSTPONE) THIS ITEM AND PLACE IT ON THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING AGENDA; COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes VIII. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Faison announced the next meeting of the Finance, Economic Development, and Regional Affairs Committee has been rescheduled due to conflicts, and would be Tuesday, June 29th at 5:00 p.m. in the Mt. Baker Conference Room. Councilmember Dovey encouraged cìtizens to visit the Federal Way Farmers Market on opening day, Saturday, June 19th. He noted this is a wonderful event for the community and runs through October. Councilmember Burbidge reported on her attendance at a joint meeting of the Puget Sound Regional Council Growth Management Policy Board and the Puget Sound Regional Council Transportation Policy Board. She announced the next meeting of the Parks, Recreations, Human Services and Public Safety Committee would be July lih at 5:00 p.m. She noted she would be attending the Association of Washington Cities (A WC) Conference; and encouraged citizens to attend Centerstage's new production of Sleuth at Knutzen Family Theatre. She also noted the Rhododendron Garden is admitting fathers for free on Father's Day, and reminded everyone of the upcoming Red, White, and Blues Festival on July 4th. Deputy Mayor Kochmar thanked everyone involved with the Volunteer Recognition Banquet, she noted it was a wonderful event; she also thanked staff responsible for the Fishing Derby held for children. She reported on her attendance at the wonderful Flag Day Ceremonies at the Aquatics Center, and encouraged everyone to attend the Red, White, and Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 15, 2004- Page 6 of 7 Blues Festival at Celebration Park on July 4th; festivities begin at 4:00 p.m. with fireworks at 10:15 p.m. Councilmember Park reported the City/Korean Community Leaders meeting was rescheduled to June 23r at 6:30 p.m. in Council Chambers. He also announced the next meeting of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee is July 9th at 8:00 a.m. Councilmember Ferrell also reported on his attendance at the Flag Day Ceremonies at the King County Aquatics Center. He further spoke to thank the many volunteers of Life Way Church who took time to volunteer at the new city hall, clearing and cleaning up the landscaping. He also commented on an impromptu meeting of neighbors and city leaders on 1 st Way South, where concerns regarding traffic related issues were raised. Mayor McColgan also expressed his gratitude to the many Life Way Church members who volunteered for landscape and miscellaneous duties at the new city hall. He further noted he recently attended the Suburban Cities retreat, and announced he is honored to assist in the Federal Way High School graduation ceremonies. He wished everyone a happy and safe Father's Day. IX. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager David Moseley reported the timeline on the new city hall is on schedule with the carpet and work stations being installed, the move for Municipal Court and Public Safety is scheduled for the weekend of the 10th. He noted the second floor - City Hall offices are scheduled to move in mid August. He thanked Assistant City Manager Derek Matheson, and Property Services Manager Steve Ikerd for all their work on this project. Mr. Moseley announced he would be attending along with other staff members and members of the Council the A WC Conference in Ocean Shores, where he is looking forward to learning and teaching. He reminded citizens of the upcoming events in the community including the Red, White, and Blues Festival at Celebration Park on July 4th, the Steel Lake Concerts in the Park every Wednesday, and the upcoming Festival Days, which is in the planning stages. City Manager Moseley was also pleased to report the Hwy 99 - Phase III project received the highest score at the PSRC meeting. He did not have the exact numbers, however he noted that meant we should be receiving sufficient monies for the project. He additionally noted the 288th and Hwy 99 project is complete. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 15, 2004- Page 7 of 7 Mr. Moseley further reminded Council the need for an Executive Session for the purpose of discussing Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) for approximately thirty minutes. x. EXECUTIVE SESSION At 9:40 p.m. Mayor McColgan announced the Council would be recessing into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing Potential Litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) for approximately thirty minutes. COUNCILMEMBER FERRELL MOVED TO SUSPEND COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE TO ALLOW THE MEETING TO CONTINUE PAST 10:00 P.M.; COUNCILMEMBER BURBIDGE SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) Council returned to Chambers at 10:05 p.m. XI. ADJOURNMENT There being nothing further to bring before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor McColgan adjourned the regular meeting at 10:05 p.m. Stephanie D. Courtney, CMC Deputy City Clerk MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM#~W CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Agenda Bill for Consent to accept the Narcotics K-9 Ownership Settlement Agreement between Washington State Patrol and the Federal Way Police Department CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: !:8J 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ A TT ACHMENTS: The Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee (FEDRAC) memo from Chief Kirkpatrick on the Narcotics K-9 Ownership Settlement Agreement between Washington State Patrol and the Federal Way Police Department; accepted by FEDRAC on June 14,2004. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety requests approval to convey and transfer all rights, titles and interest in the dog known as K-9 Diesel ITom the Washington State Patrol to the Federal Way Police Department. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions by which the Washington State Patrol will provide the Federal Way Department of Public Safety all rights, titles and interest in the dog known as K-9 Diesel. In accepting transfer from the Washington State Patrol of the dog known as K-9 Diesel, a Yellow Labrador (type of dog), the Federal Way Police Department recognizes that said animal has received training in police canine procedures and tactics, including, but not limited to, attack training and other forms of aggressive conduct, and by acceptance of this animal, the Federal Way Police Department, for and in consideration of the transfer ofK-9 Diesel, would agree to hold harmless Washington State Patrol and its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability whatsoever that might arise from acts engaged in by the forenamed canine resulting from his training as described, as well as any other acts of said canine whether or not attributable to such training. The Federal Way Police Department K-9 handler and dog known as Diesel completed training together on September 5, 2003. The K-9 Diesel was provided to the Federal Way Police Department K-9 handler for this training and has been with the handler since successful completion of the course. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: With conclusion of the Consent Motion, to accept the Narcotics K-9 Ownership Settlement Agreement between Washington State Patrol and the Federal Way Police Department. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of acceptance of the Narcotics K-9 Ownership Settlement Agreement between Washington State Patrol and the Federal Way Police Department. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: -~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.G CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee Anne Kirkpatrick, Chief of POlic~f--;!'. Davi~ ~Manager June ~4, 2001 \. '" From: Via: Date: Subject: Narcotics K-9 Ownership Settlement Agreement between Washington State Patrol and the Federal Way Police Department BACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety requests approval to convey and transfer all rights, titles and interest in the dog known as K-9 Diesel from the Washington State Patrol to the Federal Way Police Department. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions by which the Washington State Patrol will provide the Federal Way Department of Public Safety all rights, titles and interest in the dog known as K-9 Diesel. In accepting transfer from the Washington State Patrol ofthe dog known as K-9 Diesel, a Yellow Labrador (type of dog), the Federal Way Police Department recognizes that said animal has received training in police canine procedures and tactics, including, but not limited to, attack training and other forms of aggressive conduct, and by acceptance of this animal, the Federal Way Police Department, for and in consideration of the transfer ofK-9 Diesel, would agree to hold harmless the Washington State Patrol and its officers, employees and agents from any and all liability whatsoever that might arise from acts engages in by the forenamed canine resulting from his training as described, as well as any other acts of said canine whether or not attributable to such training. The Federal Way Police Department K-9 handler and dog known as Diesel completed training together on September 5, 2003. The K-9 Diesel was provided to the Federal Way Police Department K-9 handler for this training and has been with the handler since successful completion of the course. Attached is the Settlement Agreement proposed by the Washington State Patrol between the Washington State Patrol and the Federal Way Police Department. COMMITTEE ACTION: Motion to approve and accept this request for transfer of all rights, titles and interest in the dog known as K-9 Diesel from the Washington State Patrol to the Federal Way Police Department, and forward to full Council for consideration at its July 6, 2004 meetin . Committee Chair APPROVAL BY COMMIT'Q:E: -tJ~ i:\agenda bills\prhs&ps memos\2004\k-9 diesel.doc s t' t \ SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT March 10, 2004 Between the Washington State Patrol, and Federal Way Police Department ORÞ-f1 . & /z.-¿! t' t The parties to this Settlement Agreement are the Washington State Patrol (WSP), and Federal Way Police Department (New Owner). WHEREAS; the WSP has one (1) Yellow Labrador dog known as K-9 Diesel; and WHEREAS; the New Owner desires to obtain said K-9 Diesel; NOW, THEREFORE; in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and other good and valuable consideration received by the WSP and the New Owner, the parties herein do mutually agree as follows: 1. The WSP agrees to assign, convey and transfer all rights, titles and interest in the dog known as K-9 Diesel to the New Owner; 2. Acknowledgement of Training and Release of Liability. In accepting transfer from the WSP of the dog known as K-9 Diesel, a Yellow Labrador (type of dog), the New Owner recognizes that said animal has received training in police canine procedures and tactics, including, but not limited to, attack training and other forms of aggressive conduct, and by acceptance of this animal, New Owner, for and in consideration of the transfer of him/her, of K-9 Diesel, agrees to hold harmless the WSP, and its officers, employees and agents from any çmd all liability whatsoever that might arise from acts engaged in by the forenamed canine resulting from his training as herein described, as well as any other acts of said canine whether or not attributable to such training; New Owner further agrees to waive any and all claims of liability insofar as the WSP, its officers, employees and agents are concerned that might arise as a result of his/her use and/or possession of said animal. It is further agreed to waive any and all claims of liability insofar as the WSP makes no representations concerning the health of the animal, which is transferred "as is" and New Owner assumes all responsibility and obligation for the condition, care, and acts of said animal. 3. Indemnification. New Owner agrees to assume any and all risks from the date first written above and the New Owner further agrees to release, indemnify and promise to defend and save harmless the WSP, its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all liability, injuries, loss, damage, expense, actions and claims, including costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the WSP, its officers, employees and agents in defense thereof, asserting or arising directly or indirectly on account of or out of said canine's activities from ~ i Settlement Ag reement Page 2 March 10, 2004 date of said transfer; provided, however, this paragraph does not purport to indemnify the WSP against liability for any activities and said canine prior to said transfer date. 4. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null and void, insofar as it is in conflict with said laws, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 5. Venue. It is agreed that venue for any lawsuit arising out of this Agreement shall be Thurston county. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the WSP and New Owner have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. 5. That this Agreement becomes effective upon date of signatures. . . Captain Timothy Braniff Field Operations Bureau Date Federal Way Police Department New Owner Date cc: Ms. Elizabeth Delay Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General Office Ms. Candy E. Christensen, Human Resource Division Ms. Juliet Wehr Jones, Labor and Risk Management Robert Maki, Administrator, Budget and Fiscal Services Deputy Chief Lowell M. Porter, Field Operations Bureau Chief Ronal W. Serpas MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# :1Z-6- ) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: The 2004 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee Memo on the 2004 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Since 1999, the Department of Public Safety has had the good fortune to benefit from several bulletproof vest awards from the Office of Justice Programs (OJP). Once again, I am pleased to announce that we have been granted an award of $36,034.50 for the 2004 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Program. Compliance will remain the same as previously required by OJP, including the local match of 50%. It is our intent to offset this local match with savings carried-forward to FY 2004 and savings from salaries and benefits. In September 2003, Second Chance, our main supplier of body armor announced problems with its products containing Zylon fiber. This announcement came following two instances of injury (one fatal) to officers using Second Chance body armor products containing Zylon fiber. On November 18, 2003, Attorney General John Ashcroft announced that the National Institute of Justice would immediately initiate examination of Zylon-based bullet-resistant vests (both new and used). Our intent is to use this grant money to replace our Second Chance vests that may not provide adequate officer safety. Previous compliance will remain the same as required by OJP including the 50% local match. We have identified budget savings from 2003 for the local match and included it during the 2003 Carryforward process. The Department is requesting approval to accept the 2004 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant for $36,034.50 including authorization to purchase vests totaling approximately $72,069.00. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve and accept this request for the 2004 Bulletproof Vest award in the amount of$36,034.50 including authorization to procure vests at an estimated purchase cost of $72,069.00 using the Federal award and Department budget savings (36,034.50). PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of The 2004 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED 0 DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 S.H City of Federal Way CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee From: Anne Kirkpatrick, Chief of Police David MO~nagCr June 14,2004 , . , I . i.J./- _.' s./J.lf/ð1 Via: Date: Subject: 2004 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Backeround: Since 1999, the Department of Public Safety has had the good fortune to benefit from several bulletproof vest awards from the Office of Justice Programs (OJP). Once again, I am pleased to announce that we have been granted an award of $36,034.50 for the 2004 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Program. Compliance will remain the same as previously required by aJP, including the local match of 50%. It is our intent to offset this local match with savings carried-forward to FY 2004 and savings from salaries and benefits. In September 2003, Second Chance, our main supplier of body armor announced problems with its products containing Zylon fiber. This announcement came following two instances of injury (one fatal) to officers using Second Chance body armor products containing Zylon fiber. On November 18, 2003, Attorney General John Ashcroft announced that the National Institute of Justice would immediately initiate examination of Zylon-based bullet-resistant vests (both new and used). Our intent is to use this grant money to replace our Second Chance vests that may not provide adequate officer safety. Previous compliance will remain the same as required by OJP including the 50% local match. We have identified budget savings from 2003 for the local match and included it during the 2003 Carryforward process. COMMITTEE ACTION: Motion to approve and accept the 2004 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant of$36,034.50 including authorization to purchase vests totaling approximately $72,069.00, and forward to full Council for consideration at its July 6, 2004 meeting. Committee Chair APPROV AL BY COMMITTEE: ~ H ..\ MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM#.:iT Ø-) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Washington Conservation Corps Interlocal Agreement CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: C8J 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL nUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee action form dated June 14,2004; Washington Conservation Corps Interlocal Agreement SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: As part of the mitigation plan for Celebration Park the city is required to have a five- year plan in which to establish an 80% cover of native vegetation within designated areas. The city entered into an Interlocal agreement with the Washington Conservation Corps for the 2003-2004 growing season. The interlocal rate for this service and equipment is $3500 per week, which breaks down to approximately $14.58 and hour. After assessing the site and the amount of workload remaining, I recommend allocating up to four weeks of labor, for a total of $12,800. Funding for these services wi]] be covered out of the 2004 facility maintenance contract account. Parks will continue to use volunteers to supplement related task. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENÐA TION: Motion to place this item on Councils July 6, 2004 consent agenda with a "do pass" recommendation to accept the interlocal agreement with the Department of Ecology, Washington Conservation Corps for the amount of $12,800, extending the term until December 31, 2004. PROI>OSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Washington Conservation Corps InterlocaJ Agreement as presented." CITY MANAGER AI>PROV AL: ~.~ ~ un~--- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE] COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEÐ/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL HILL # 1 S1' reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # n~_- ~-- n~- n - -~---- ~ REVISED - 05/10/2001 S.A City of Federal Way Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department MEMORANDUM Date: June 14,2004 To: PRHSPS Council Committee Subject: Steve Ikerd, Property Services Manager David M~anager Washington Conservation Corps Interlocal Agreement From: Via: Back2round As part of the mitigation plan for Celebration Park the city is required to have a five-year plan in which to establish an 80% cover of native vegetation within designated areas. Within this mitigated area there can be no exotic plants such as Scot's broom or Himalayan blackberry. Early on there was a wide spread outbreak of Scot's broom and other species which the Parks Department has been attempting to eradicate with seasonals, volunteers, and contract support over the past four years. We have been very successful in reaching the 80% native cover, but are still battling a few of the exotics. The city entered into an InterIocal agreement with the Washington Conservation Corps for the 2003-2004 growing season. WCC will provided a six member crew, which includes a supervisor, transportation, equipment, tools and experience for an "at cost" rate. The interlocal rate for this service and equipment is $3500 per week, which breaks down to approximately $14.58 and hour. After accessing the site and the amount of workload remaining, I recommend allocating up to four weeks onabor, for a total of $12,800. Funding for these services will be covered out of the 2004 facility maintenance contract account. Parks will continue to use volunteers to supplement related task. Due to unforeseen circumstances the 2004 service could not be completed by the time the agreement ended on April 30, 2004. J recommend extending the agreement until December 31, 2004 to give more time for the Corps to complete the task. Recommendation Staff recommends the PRHSPS Council Committee to place the following recommendation on the July 6, 2004 Council Consent Agenda: To extend the interlocal agreement with the Department of Ecology, Washington Conservation Corps until December 31,2004 for the amount of$12,800. Committee Recommendation Motion to place this item on Councils July 6, 2004 consent agenda with a "do pass" recommendation to accept the interlocal agreement with the Department of Ecology, Washington Conservation Corps for the amount of $12,800, extending the term until December 31, 2004. =-1 J t\- \ ... l1li """;101 STIlE DEfA""'T OF E C 0 LOG Y wee AGREEMENT NO. WCCO4-16-003 W ^SIIINC'I'ON CONSIŒV ^'I'ION colœs SPONSOI~ CON'j'I~^C'I' 1 ,",0 ~f' THIS CONTRACT made by and between the State of Washington Department of Ecology conservation¡¿~~. - r i hereinafter referred to as the "DEPARTMENT, " and that entity whose name appears in item 1, below, ~/~(j ð hereinafter referred to as the "SPONSOR." 1. SPONSOR: City of Federal Way Parks 2. CONTACTS 3. ADDRESS: 31130 28th Ave. S. DEPT. PROJECT LEADER Nicholas Mott (360) 407-6946 Federal Way, WA SPONSOR CONTACT David Leider (253) 661-4042 98003 CREW SUPERVISOR OTHER SPONSOR FISCAL OFFICER 4. PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION: Celebration Park 5. PROJECT LOCATION: City of Federal Way 6. SCOPE OF WORK: Plant removal and other work as needed 7. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: CONTRACT BEGINS, 6/1/04 CONTRACT ENDS, 12/31/04 8. MAX IMUM BUDGET REIMBURSED to DEPARTMENT Provided by DEPARTMENT Cost Provided by SPONSOR/DONATIONS COST WCC Crew Labor for 4 weeks $0 $ 12,800 Total DEPARTMENT Cost $0 Total SPONSOR COST $ 12,800 Above cost Not to be Exceeded 10. Special Terms and Conditions ŒI No 0 Yes (See XVII.) 11. Biennial Closures: In accordance with biennial closing procedures, the sponsor must REMARKS reimburse the DEPARTMENT no later than June 30 2005 for services or material supplied under this contract when submitted for payment on properly itemized vouchers (Form A-19). AFRS ACCOUNT CODE TRANS APPN PROG PROJECT SUB PROJ ORG CO. OBJ SUB AMOUNT CODE FUND INDE INDE PROJ PHAS INDE OBJ X X X t\- 2.. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS CONTRACT, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. All rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be subject to and governed by those General Terms and Conditions contained in the text of this contract instrument and Section XVII. 'SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS." II. In the event of an inconsistency in this contract, unless otherwise provided herein, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (a) Applicable Federal & State Statutes & Regulations, (b) Special Terms and Conditions, and (c) General Terms and Conditions. 111. This contract and its appendices, if any, contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. IV. This contract shall be subject to the written approval of the authorized representative of the DEPARTMENT and shall not be binding until so approved. Only the authorized representative by writing (delegation to be made prior to action) shall have the expressed, implied, or apparent authority to alter, amend, modify, or waive any clause or condition of this contract. Furthermore, any alteration, amendment, modification, or waiver of any clause or condition of this contract is not effective or binding unless made in writing and signed by the authorized representative. V. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE: A. Authority The Legislature enacted Chapter 43.220 RCW which created the Washington Conservation Corps, hereinafter referred to as the "WCC," and named the DEPARTMENT as one of six state agencies having implementation authority. B. Purpose The purpose of this contract is to establish a formal understanding between the DEPARTMENT and the SPONSOR to accomplish the project described in Section 7. "SCOPE OF WORK." This contract is designed to specify the kinds and amounts of goods and services to be used and/or exchanged by the DEPARTMENT and the SPONSOR to their mutual benefit through a WCC project. The SPONSOR acknowledges that participation in the WCC program shall not result in the displacement of currently employed workers, including partial displacement such as reduction in hours of nonovertime work, wages, or other employment benefits, nor in the impairment of existing contracts for services. VI. DEFINITIONS: A. "SPONSOR Contact" shall mean the person who serves as the SPONSOR's lead on the project and shall cooperate with all parties concerned to promote successful completion of the project described in Section 7. 'SCOPE OF WORK.' B. "SPONSOR Work Director" shall mean the person who specifies work to be performed onsite; outlines, describes, and delegates work to be accomplished; supplies necessary orientation and training for use of special equipment and procedures; and is responsible for directing WCC crew supervisor(s) regarding specific project tasks as described in Section 7. "SCOPE OF WORK." C. "DEPARTMENT Project Leader' shall mean the person who is responsible for developing and facilitating the project and shall serve as liaison between the DEPARTMENT and SPONSOR. PROJECT LEADER assumes ultimate responsibility to ensure adequate coordination of the project. D. "Corps Member" shall mean an individual enrolled in the WCC program. Corps members shall not be considered regular state employees. Provisions of law relating to civil service, hours of work, rate of compensation, sick leave, unemployment compensation, state retirement plans. and vacation leave do not apply to the Corps members. However, medical aid and state industrial insurance will be provided by the DEPARTMENT for each Corps member. E. "Crew Supervisor" shall mean the person who is responsible for matters relating to personnel administration and overall project direction. He/she supervises Corps members (generally four or more) regarding work to be accomplished and is responsible for individual crew safety, daily crew supervision and discipline, completes Corps member training plans, and provides a written evaluation of each Corps member's job performance and skills acquired after two months and at termination of employment. VII. SCOPE OF WORK: Both parties agree to compete in a satisfactory and proper manner the services described under the Section 7. "SCOPE OF WORK" of this contract, and to provide materials and supplies necessary to ensure satisfactory completion of the project, including any special equipment required by special work conditions, and to procure any necessary permits such as right of entry. The DEPARTMENT agrees to provide Corps members who will be used to complete said work. All equipment provided by either the DEPARTMENT or the SPONSOR shall be returned to the provider within fifteen (15) days after termination of this contract, unless otherwise specified in Section XVII. "SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS." A--3 VIII. PERFORMANCE: A. Time for Performance: Any work performed prior to the effective date of this SPONSOR CONTRACT, or continuing after the completion date of same, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing herein, will be in violation of this contract and will be at the SPONSOR's expense. B. Compliance With All Laws: The SPONSOR agrees to observe all federal and state laws, regulations, and policies affecting performance under this contract. C. Release of Information or Materials: The SPONSOR will not release any information or materials developed pursuant to this contract without prior written authority from the DEPARTMENT. D. Final Report Evaluation: Within 15 days after termination of this contract, the SPONSOR shall provide the DEPARTMENT with a written evaluation of the project. At a minimum, the following shall be evaluated: 1. Benefit to Corps members 2. Environmental benefits 3. Department cooperation/coordination 4. Whether the overall goals and objectives of the project were obtained 5. Suggestions for program improvement 6. Revised estimates of alternate supplier cost and SPONSOR cost/donation IX. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT: A. Termination bv SPONSOR for Cause: If the DEPARTMENT fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this contract, or if DEPARTMENT shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, assurances, or stipulations of the contract, SPONSOR shall have the right to terminate this contract by giving written notice specifying the effective termination date to the DEPARTMENT at least seven (7) days before such date. B. Termination bv DEPARTMENT for Cause: If SPONSOR fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this contract, or if SPONSOR shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, assurances, or stipulations of the contract, DEPARTMENT shall have the right to terminate this contract by giving written notice specifying the effective termination date to the SPONSOR at least seven (7) days before such date. C. Termination by DEPARTMENT for Convenience: The DEPARTMENT may terminate this contract by giving written notice to SPONSOR of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least ten (10) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event. all finished or unfinished documents and other materials as described above shall be delivered to DEPARTMENT for its review. After the review at the option of DEPARTMENT such documents or material or portions thereof shall become its property. D. Insufficient FundinQ: In the event funding from state, federal, or other sources is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way after the after the effective date of this contract and prior to normal completion, the DEPARTMENT may terminate the contract under Section IX.C. "Termination by DEPARTMENT for Convenience" clause, subject to renegotiation under those new funding limitations and conditions. X. LIABILITY: A. When direct supervision is provided by the DEPARTMENT employed crew supervisor, the DEPARTMENT agrees that WCC members working under this contract are agents of the DEPARTMENT, and therefore the DEPARTMENT shall be liable for personal injury or property damage caused by WCC Corps member negligence. B. When direct supervision is provided by the SPONSOR, the SPONSOR agrees that WCC Corps members working under this contract are agents of the SPONSOR, and therefore the SPONSOR shall be liable for personal injury or property damage caused by WCC Corps member negligence. C. To the extent that the Constitution and laws of the State of Washington permit, all parties to this contract shall be responsible for damage to persons or property resulting from the negligence on the part of itself, its employees, its agents, or its officers. None of the parties assume any responsibility to the other parties for the consequences of any act or omission of any person, firm, or corporation not a party to this contract. XI. NON-DISCRIMINATION: The DEPARTMENT and the SPONSOR agree to be bound by all federal and state laws, regulations, and policies against discrimination and agree not to discriminate in employment, either directly or indirectly, because of a person's age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, creed, color, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification. Ç\-~ XII. DISPUTES: Except as otherwise provided in this contract, when a bona fide dispute arises between the DEPARTMENT and the SPONSOR and it cannot be resolved, either party may request a dispute resolution with the DEPARTMENT The parties agree that this dispute resolution process shall precede any action in a judicial tribunal. Either party's request for a dispute resolution must: A. be in writing; B. state the disputed issues; C. state the relative positions of the parties; D. state the SPONSOR's name, address, and WCC Agreement number; E. be mailed to the DEPARTMENT within thirty (30) days after the party could reasonably be expected to have knowledge of the issue(s) which are now in dispute. XIII. INVOICE VOUCHERS: Reimbursable expenditures under the terms and conditions of this contract shall in no event exceed the amount set forth herein. The SPONSOR shall reimburse the DEPARTMENT for services performed when submitted on a properly itemized voucher (Form A-19) in accordance with Section 9. "MAXIMUM BUDGET' Reimbursement shall be made by the SPONSOR within thirty (30) days of receipt of said voucher. XIV. AMENDMENTS: Changes in the scope of this contract which cause an increase or decrease in the cost of, or the time required for the performance of any part of the scope of work under this contract, shall be accomplished by written amendment and executed by both parties prior to implementation. XV. SUBCONTRACTS: The SPONSOR shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this contract without obtaining prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT'S PROJECT LEADER. XVI. RECORDS RETENTION: Both parties shall maintain books, records, documents and other evidence of accounting procedures and practices which sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended in the performance of the SPONSOR CONTRACT These records shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection, review, or audit by duly authorized personnel for six years after the contract end date. XVII. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS: Special terms and conditions of this contract contained in the box below ŒJ are not D are made a part of this contract (requires initials). I / I Department Sponsor XVII. ENTIRE CONTRACT: This document contains the entire and integrated contract between the parties, and no statement, promise, inducement or agreement made by the DEPARTMENT or its agents or employees that is not contained in this written contract shall be valid or binding. No alteration, addition, or modification of any of the terms or conditions of this contract shall be effective if not in writing and signed by the authorized representatives of the SPONSOR and the DEPARTMENT SIGNATURES: SPONSOR BY: DEPARTMENT BY: David H. Moseley TITLE: City ManaQer TITLE: Field Operations Coordinator DATE: DATE: 5/21/04 Pre-Approved as to form by the Assistant Attorney General Approved as to Form: í\-5 Patricia A. Richardson, City Attorney Ecology is an Equal Opportunity and Affirmative action employer. For special accommodation needs, contact the Washington Conservation Corps at (206) 407-6947. The TOO number is (206) 407-6006. {\-~ MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# r-~~ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: "Pray Federal Way" Event at Saghalie Park CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [8J CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee action form dated June 14,2004; "Pray Federal Way" Event at Saghalie Park SUMMARYfBACKGROUND: "Pray Federal Way" (PFW) is an organization that was formed last year. They held their first multi-denominational church picnic on Saturday August 17,2003, at Saghalie Park. PFW has requested the use of Saghalie Park again this year for a similar event. However, for 2004 the event is being expanded from one day to two days. For this reason staff has determined it prudent to draft a Memorandum of Understanding to clearly outline the responsibilities of both parties. The M.O.U. has been reviewed and approved by the legal department and is attached for your reference. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to accept the 2004 Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Federal Way and "Pray Federal Way" and to place this item before Council on the July 6th, 2004 consent agenda. PROI)OSED MOTION: "1 move approval ofthe "Pray Federal Way" Event at Saghalie Park as presented." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CL1!.1lKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 T ABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 81" 1 reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # ~_._---- REVISED - 05/10/2001 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: June 14, 2004 To: PRHSPS Council Committee From: Kurt Reuter, Park Operations Superintendent David ~anagcr "Pray Federal Way" Event at Saghalie Park Via: Subject: Back2round: "Pray Federal Way" (PFW) is an organization that was formed last year. They held their first multi-denominational church picnic on Saturday August 17,2003, at Saghalie Park. The event was well received by the community. PFW has requested the use of Saghalie Park again this year for a similar event. However, for 2004 the event is being expanded from one day to two days. For this reason staff has determined it prudent to draft a Memorandum of Understanding to clearly outline the responsibilities of both parties. The M.O.U. has been reviewed and approved by the legal department and is attached for your reference. Because PFW uses the entire park for their event, they are required to complete a Special Event Permit application and are assessed a fee for the use of the park. The fee being charged for the 2004 event will be $1,500.00. This reflects a small increase from the fee charged for 2003, due to the extended amount of time the event will occupy the park. Committee Recommendation: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to accept the 2004 Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Federal Way and "Pray Federal Way" and to place this item before Council on the July 61", 2004 consent agenda. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE " City of Federal Way and Pray Federal Way DRAft !e(~(!~ , Memorandum of Understanding "The Gathering / Picnic & Praise @ Saghalie Park" 2004 THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU"), dated this 1 sl day of July, 2004, defines the respective responsibj]jties of the City of Federal Way ("City") and Pray Federal Way ("PFW") in connection with the use of Saghalie Park. Recitals: A. PFW produces an annual outdoor event, known as "The Gathering / Picnic & Praise @ Saghalie Park", in Saghalie Park, Federal Way, Washington ("Event"). The Event includes a picnic and live entertainment over a two (2) day period, July 31 and August 1, 2004, from 7:00am to 9:00pm. B. PFW will serve as the producer of the Event. The City wj)l provide location and services as outlined in this MOu. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: I. City responsibilities. The City agrees as fol1ows: 1. Event. A. The City shall provide use of Saghalie Park and all amenities contained therein. This includes baseball, softball, soccer, and footbal1 fields, tennis, basketball and volleyball courts, children's play structure and picnic tables. B. The City shall provide maintenance support consisting of site preparation, cleaning and maintenance of restroom facilities, designated temporary trailer parking, and logistical support. II. PFW responsibilities. PFW shall: 1. Provide a detailed sitc plan and final time line of the Event by July 16,2004, to the City liaison, Kurt W. Reuter, Parks Operations Superintendent. 2. Name the City as an additional insured on all certificates of insurance relative to the use of Saghalie Park. Copies of all insurance certificates will be provided to the City liaison, Kurt W. Reuter, Parks Operations Superintendent, by July] 6,2004 for inclusion in the event. Without such certificates, the event may not be held. 3. Provide volunteer support at a level that ensures adequate supervision of evcnt activities and spectators before, during and after the Event. 4. PFW agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and al1 claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from, or connected with this MOU to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the PFW, its partners, officers, shareholders, agents, employees, invitees, or volunteers, or by PFW breach of this MOU. PFW waives any immunity that may be granted to it under the Washington State Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW. PFW indemnification shall not be limited in any way by any limitation of the amount of damages, compensation or benefits payable to or by any third party under workers compensation acts, disability benefit acts or any other benefits acts or programs. This MOU contains the obligations of both parties for PFW and may not be changed or modified except by written agreement by both parties. Donna Hanson, Interim PRCS Director P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, W A 98063 - 9718 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson Ron Walker, Team Leader Pray Federal Way STATE OF W ASHIN GTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day personally appeared before me , to me known to be the of that executed thc foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporati on. GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of ,200_. (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# .JZ:.. (f-J CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Jim Webster Field Memorial CATEGORY: BUDGET IMI> ACT: rg¡ 0 D CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ A 1'1' ACHMEN1'S: Committee action form dated June 14, 2004; Jim Webster Field Memorial SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: In March 2004, the city conducted a public process to name two neighborhood parks scheduled for eonstruction this year. One ofthe recommendations was to name a park after former council member, Jim Webster. Although the Webster family appreciates the recommendation to name a park in his memory they have asked that he be remembered by naming something that has a direct connection to his involvement as a council member and one that relates to his years of service as a Parks and Recreation professional. Staff recommends naming Celebration Park Ball field number one, "Jim Webster" field. Field one has the scoreboard and is used as the "championship field" during tournaments. The Webster family has endorsed this proposal. CITY COUNCIL COMMI1'TlŒ RECOMMENDATION: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to acccpt thc recommendation to name Celebration Park Ball field number one, "Jim Webster" Field, and to plaee this item on thc consent agenda at the July 6, 2004 meeting. PROPOSED MOTION: "1 move approval of the Jim Webster Field Memorial as presented." CITY MANAGER AJ>PROV AL: ~~~=~- -~=~"--~~-- (BELOW TO BE COMPLEThlJ BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED D DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # --~~-- ~~~--~--~ REVISED - 05/10/2001 SoD CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: June 14,2004 To: PRHSPS Council Committee From: Parks and Recreation Commission David Mò~~anager Jim Webster ~ld ~e~orial Via: Subject: Back2round: In March 2004, the cÜy conducted a public process to name two neighborhood parks scheduled for construction this year. One of the recommendations was to name a park after former council member, Jim Webster. Mr. Webster was one of the city's first council members and was also a professional in the field of Parks and Recreation for more than thirty-five years. Mr. Webster served on the City Council from 1990 - 1992. He passed away in October of last year. Although the Webster family appreciates the recommendation to name a park in his memory they have asked that he be remembered by naming something that has a direct connection to his involvement as a council member and one that relates to his years of service as a Parks and Recreation professional. The Webster family has endorsed this proposal. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends naming Celebration Park BalI field number one, "Jim Webster" field. Field one has the scoreboard and is used as the "championship field" during tournaments. The CÜy of Federal Way, the Washington Recreation and Park Association and the International Northwest Parks and Recreation Association have colIected donations in Mr. Webster's memory. The City desires to use these donations to purchase and instalI a new "Jim Webster Field" sign and to provide an interpretive plaque. Committee Recommendation: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to accept the recommendation to name Celebration Park BalI field number one, "Jim Webster" Field, and to place this item on the consent agenda at the July 6, 2004 meeting. L D-\ MEETING DATE: JUL Y 6, 2004 ITEM# ~Ê CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Grant Funding Applications for Transportation Improvement Projects CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated June 21, 2004. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Analysis of the intersection at S 348th Street and Enchanted Parkway shows failure under existing traffic conditions and does not meet concurrency demands. Since April 5, 2004 (the last staff presentation to Council) three new development pre-applications have been submitted to the City that will further impact the operation and the level of service at this intersection. Due to the intersection's present level of service, its high accident rate, and coupled with the above-identified proposed developments, staff believes this project should be accelerated and submitted for the 2005 grant funding cycle. The estimated project costs are $4.5 million; grant funds could range from $3.15 to 2.7 million, with a required match of $1.35 to 1.8 million. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its June 21, 2004 meeting, the Land Use and Transportation Committee made the following recommendation: Authorize staff to submit grant-funding applications for the South 348th Street at SR 161 (Enchanted Parkway) Intersection Improvements Project. PROPOSED MOTION: I move to authorize staff to submit grant-funding applications for the South 348th Street at SR 161 (Enchanted Parkway) Intersection Improvements Project. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .....~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D D D 0 APPROVED DENIED T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # ~ CITY OF ~ ~ Federal Way DATE: June 21, 2004 FROM: Marwan Salloum, Street Systems Mana David H. ~Manager Grant Funding Applications for Transportation Improvement Projects TO: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: On April 5, 2004 staff presented the Committee with a list of current grant funding availability for transportation projects (see attached memo). As you know, analysis of the intersection at S 34Sth Street and Enchanted Parkway shows failure under existing traffic conditions and also does not meet concurrency demands. Also since that time, three new development pre-applications have been submitted to the City that will further impact the operation and the level of service at this intersection. The three proposed developments are: . Federal Way Market Place on 16th Ave S, north of S 34Sth Street OPUS Development at the corner of S 34Sth Street and Enchanted Parkway Christian Faith Center . . Due to the intersection's present level of service, its high accident rate, and coupled with the above- identified proposed developments, staff believes this project should be accelerated and submitted for the 2005 grant funding cycle. Estimated Proj. Possible Grant Fund Required Match Project (Funding Phase) Grant Cost in Millions Range in Millions in Millions ** South 34Sth Street at SR 161(Enchanted Park Way} Intersection Improvements (Design, Right of Way and Construction) 2005 Transportation Partnership Program (State) $4.5 $3.15 to 2.7 $1.35 to 1.8 **5taff estimates a possible mitigation fund for this project in the amount of $850,000, leaving a required City matching fund of $500,000 to $950,000 if grant funding is approved. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends placing the following items on the July 6,2004 Council Consent Agenda: Authorize staff to submit grant-funding applications for the South 34Sth Street at SR 161 (Enchanted Parkway) Intersection Improvements Project - --' - '-:. --+>..- ~-.~- '- ~R:V~~;~~~---- 9;;rf::;. -- - cc: Project File Day File K:\LUTC\2004\GRANT FUNDING APPLICATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 6-04.DOC 2 CITY OF ,~ Federal Way DATE: April 5, 2004 FROM: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use and Transportation committee~, --- Marwan Salloum, Street Systems Manager ~ David H. ~anager Grant Funding ~PPlications for Transportation Improvement Projects TO: VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: This memorandum provides the Council with the current funding availability of grant applications for transportation projects. Staff has evaluated all projects listed on the City's Six Year Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP) and concluded that the following projects will likely be competitive in the 2005 funding cycle. Project(Funding Phase) Grant Estimated Proj. Cost in Millions Possible Grant Fund Range in Millions Required Match in Millions U Pacific Highway S HOV Phase III (S 284th Street to Dash Point Road) (Construction Only) 2005 Regional TEA21 (Federal) $11.0 $3.0 to 5.0 $0.4 to 0.7 Pacific Highway S HOV Phase IV (Dash Point Road to S 312th Street) (Des~nandR~htofWayPhas~ 2005 Regional TEA21 (Federal) 2005 Countywide TEA21 (Federal) 2005 Transportation Partnership Program (State) $5.0 $5.0 $5.0 $2.0 to 4.2 $0.8 $3.5 to 2.5 $0.31 to 0.66 $0.12 $1.5 to 2.5 S 320th Street At first Avenue South Intersection Improvements (Design, Right of Way and Construction) 2005 Arterial Improvement $4.5 $3.2 to 2.7 Program (State) $1.3 to 1.8 ** If more than one grant is awarded on a project, it is possible to match the match between the grants. Therefore, minimizing the Oty required match. RECOMMENDATION: /--. ( .~ ) Staff recommends placing the following items on the April 20, 2004 Council Consent Agenda: Authorize staff to submit grant funding applications for the following transportation improvements projects: . Pacific Highway S HOV Phase III (S 284th Street to Dash Point Road) . Pacific Highway S HOV Phase IV (Dash Point Road to S 312th Street) . S 320th Street at First Avenue South Intersection Improvements MS:kk cc: Project File Day Rle K:\lutc\2004\Grant Funding Applications for Transportation Improvement Projects Jt Ch.aÆ V DIJ va1 ( eJj{C¿£ }¡j f1'L ç¡¿ If fY rM./L 1/ !JfI1?!3 t1 ç; M ól.ð tß .przfV1t1 j hA () V J11ftj J$ W1 q¡w r cd /iv f!;J f/¿!¿;rL I7ttfr {VÙ ~ k fl~~ m fiJctt: 2 '.~ MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# $(Á ) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2005 Street Sweeping Service - Authorization to Bid CATEGORY: [gJ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS BUDGET IMPACT: 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req' d: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated June 21, 2004. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way contracts for street sweeping services. The City has not solicited bids since 2000. Staff recommends advertising this service for bid. The approved budget for the 2004 Street Sweeping Service Contract is $75,000. Currently, City Council has not approved and adopted the 2005/2006 budget for street sweeping services. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its June 21, 2004 meeting, the Land Use and Transportation Committee made the following recommendation: Authorize staff to seek bids for the 2005 Street Sweeping Service Contract. PROPOSED MOTION: I move to authorize staff to seek bids for the 2005 Street Sweeping Service Contract. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: 7f!W\- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 ~ CITY OF .,.. ~ Federal Way DATE: June 21, 2003 FROM: Marwan Salloum, P.E, Street Systems Manage David H. M~nager 2005 Street Sweeping Service - Authorization to Bid TO: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way contracts for street sweeping services. The City has not solicited bids since 2000. Staff recommends advertising this service for bid. AVAILABLE FUNDING: The approved budget for the 2004 Street Sweeping Service Contract is $75,000. Currently, City Council has not approved and adopted the 2005/2006 budget for street sweeping services. RECOMMENDATION: Motion for the Land Use and Transportation Committee to place authorization for staff to seek bids for the 2005 Street Sweeping Service Contract on the July 6, 2004 Council Consent Agenda. -- _...~----.~-,,--~-_..~. ~-- .'---" --. .'.~----,~-- ~-_...~-~_. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: :< '. Michael Park, Member . e................). -~---~ Eric Faison, Member,. ....,~-' ",.=,-,... '~"""---~..' ...=~-,,=-,. ""."'" cc: Day File k:\lutc\2004\200S Street Sweeping Service auth to bid.doc MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# TO) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2005 Landscape Maintenance Service - Authorization to Bid CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated June 21, 2004. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way contracts for arterial street landscaping maintenance services. Pacific Highway South Phase II construction will be completed by the end of 2004. Therefore, maintenance of the landscaping area within Pacific Highway Phase II (S 324th to S 340th Streets) will be added to the 2005 Landscaping Maintenance Contract. The approved budget for the 2004 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract is $160,000.00. Currently, City Council has not approved and adopted the 2005/2006 budget for right of way landscape maintenance. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its June 21, 2004 meeting, the Land Use and Transportation Committee made the following recommendation: Authorize staff to seek bids for the 2005 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract. PROPOSED MOTION: I move to authorize staff to seek bids for the 2005 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract. ~I~~ ~~~~~-~~R~ . (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST d. rea 109 Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 ~ CITY OF ~ ~ Federal Way DATE: June 21, 2004 FROM: Marwan Salloum, P.E., Street Systems Man David H. M~nager -- 2005 Landscape Maintenance SelVice - Authorization to Bid TO: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND The City of Federal Way contracts for arterial street landscaping maintenance services. The construction of Pacific Highway South Phase II will be completed by the end of 2004. Therefore, maintenance of the landscaping area within Pacific Highway Phase II (S 324th to S 340th Streets) will be added to the 2005 Landscaping Maintenance Contract. Staff recommends advertising this project for bid. AVAILABLE FUNDING The approved budget for the 2004 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract is $160,000.00. Currently, City Council has not approved and adopted the 2005/2006 budget for right of way landscape maintenance. RECOMMENDATION Motion for the Land Use and Transportation Committee to place authorization for staff to seek bids for the 2005 Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Contract on the July 6, 2004 Council Consent Agenda. ~~'--~'_",~"',,_-'=". _._~. .~_.. ...~~~_... '~'=""" "~-" ...~ ---~'.._.-._~....' .~=_.. ~=""="~'I APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: ' . .. D . vey;ëhOir ~~¿-< -E::-m: ... I .-.. ..~. -~,-=----~~ .~. ~~,.--'-"-~~~=~.'---~-" cc: Day File k:\lutc\2004\200S Lnadscape Maintenance SelVice Auth to bid.doc MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# ~(j) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: RFB 04-112 Sewer Extension Bellacarino Woods- Bid Award CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: r8J D D CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use and Transportation Committee dated June 21, 2004. .............................. SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: Council authorized re-bidding this project on May 18, 2004. On June 3, the bids were opened and the apparent lowest responsive, responsible bidder was Brad Mason Trucking & Excavating with a total bid of $88,753.60. The bid is within the funded amount at 7.4% over the engineer's estimate. Reference checks on the low bidder indicate that this contractor has successfully performed similar work. As a result, staff believes that Brad Mason Trucking & Excavating can successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction. PROJECT FUNDING: The total estimated project expenditures are $99,029, including a 10% construction contingency. This project is being funded through the SWM Utility Capital Facility Program. Staff anticipates making a future request to the Council for allocation of funding to complete legal proceedings, and construction of fencing around the facility. Construction of this project would commence in late July 2004 with an estimated substantial completion date in August 2004. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff requests that the Committee place the following project recommendations on the July 6, 2004 City Council Consent Agenda: . Award the Bellacarino Woods Sewer Extension Project to Brad Mason Trucking & Excavating, the lowest responsible, responsible bidder, in the amount of $88,753.60; and approve a 10% construction contingency of$8,875 for a total funded construction cost of $97,629. . Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its June 21, 2004 meeting, the Land Use and Transportation Committee made the following recommendations: . Award the Bellacarino Woods Sewer Extension Project to Brad Mason Trucking & Excavating, the lowest responsible, responsible bidder, in the amount of $88,753.60; and approve a 10% construction contingency of $8,875 for a total funded construction cost of $97,629. . Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. PROPOSED MOTION: I move to award the Bellacarino Woods Sewer Extension Project to Brad Mason Trucking & Excavating, the lowest responsible, responsible bidder, in the amount of $88,753.60; and approve a 10% construction contingency of $8,875 for a total funded construction cost of $97,629. I further move to authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. ~I;;~:A~=~~~~::~W~~£CO~~L£~ 0:;£) . COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 .~ CITY OF ~ ~ Federal Way DATE: June 21, 2004 FROM: Jack Dovey, Chair, Land Use and Transportation Committee Paul A. Bucich, Surface Water Manage~ David H. ~anager RFB 04-112 s~er Extension Bellacarino Woods- Bid Award TO: VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: On May 18, the Council authorized rejection of all bids for RFB 04-110 and re-bid of the project. The project was re-advertised on May 26 and a total of four bids were opened on June 3. The apparent lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Brad Mason Trucking & Excavating with a total bid of $88,753.60. The bid is within the funded amount at 7.4% over the engineer's estimate. Reference checks on the low bidder indicate that this contractor has successfully performed similar work. As a result, staff believes that Brad Mason Trucking & Excavating can successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction. Therefore, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Brad Mason Trucking & Excavating in the amount of $88,753.60. PROJECT FUNDING: PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Proposed Award Amount (wjSa/es Tax) Construction Contingency @ 10% TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS Advertising Revision of Documents CURRENT $88,753.60 $8,875.00 $97,629.00 $1,200.00 $200.00 $99,029.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS AVAILABLE FUNDING: This project is being funded through the SWM Utility Capital Facility Program. The original cost estimate for development of the SW 356th Street Regional Stormwater Control Facility did not set aside specific monies for construction of a sanitary sewer line, which was a negotiated condition of acquiring the necessary property to create a regional storm water storage facility. June 21, 2004 LUTC memo - (RFB 04-112) Sewer Extension Bellacarino Woods Project Page 2 Staff anticipates making a future request to the Council for allocation of funding to complete legal proceedings, and construction of fencing around the facility. Construction of this project would commence in late July 2004 with an estimated substantial completion date in August 2004. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff requests that the Committee place the following project recommendations on the July 6, 2004 City Council Consent Agenda: . Award the Belläcarino Woods Sewer Extension Project to Brad Mason Trucking & Excavating, the lowest responsible, responsible bidder, in the amount of $88,753.60; and approve a 10% construction contingency of $8,875 for a total funded construction cost of $97,629. . Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. PB:jw cc: Project File Central File K:\LUTC\20O4\RF 04-112 LUTC idAward- eliacarinoWoodsSewerExtsn 20O40608.doc CITY OF FEDERAL WAY RFB 04-112 Sewer Extension Project- Bellacarino Woods By: J, Wolf 6/3/04 Unit Bid Tabulations Cost Estimate :..::;,,:,~A"':-f' - t~r ""'".""'¥""'fHi. -,~.?¡!.f1~-~::':'. l':":,'.,.t..'l~;'\ ',':~T.-Qta,lsl"'¡;'; ',;;"-::':;'t<'" .;11',' ';""':":':""""'" . ,..~ti"'\""""""'I; :'~""':\(I:;' Plan ~st¡r~. ~êÎ1g!~~~,~;~, Unit ~rice ~~i~P,,~~ ':i Unit Pr.ice ~~;r2.~,"'~~:~'~~ Qty. I Unit pnce/lfEst,mate'" Low Bidder '~~¡~ßldder ',2nd Bid ~;,2n~ Bid ,~' Bid ItemlDescription Unit ,l~}i~D;;<iif.:}.I-; R L Alyia Co '"!"'>"'" ;,~.:'~1 . . . ," :'"~', .. ',',.' Contractor Name and bid comments: LS 1 S 5.050 ~$:0,15.050: S LS 1 S 1.200 ;$",1 ~200 ~ S LS 1 $ 2,800 ~$~1A!2;800! $ LS 1 S 1 ,000 j5'!,w.~~00m $ sy 190 S 3.40 ;:$t:'~;~646'; s ea 2 S 600 ::$:~'.1';200' S LF 365 S 50.89 "S 18,575' $ LF 15 $ 47.06 S ":~~:706' S LF 360 S 28.68 :$ '10,325 $ LF 90 S 37.60 $ ";3,384, $ EA 1 S 657 $ ~,..':l651' s LF 830 $ 1.03 ,$";:":~855:¡ S LF 58 $ 19.70 ::$]:~'1,:143' S EA 1 $ 1,828 ;$:"'>/1 ;828- S EA 1 $ 1,784 :5::g.1;784: S SF 5,300 $ 0.35 :'S~1~855'; s CY 750 S 2.25 '$:,"'1,688'" s :t!;~~';"{.'f!'.:'~ .5:::,2;300: $ $ ';'.5;-100; S :,$":';-:::'800' $ $.i1-~700 S "S;~'1~475:' S .$'tt-2A80" S $ 22.00 ~ S $ 105 ~$':182~415~ S $ 2,000 ~$~60~ s S 35.00 t$"",1'~i.5Ö'~ S $ 5.00 .:'$ ft,1;~370~ S ~,'.;'S75,965' Sales Tax (8.8%): $6,684.88 ~~r~{'~;'~.~J4~;:;:,:;r.';'¡':}'~:'::'- '::: ;':L:\~~'~,:",~;:,";' :,,~,:,-'r~:\~~!'it.!tt,~ti;'~~ .t"" ~'<t~~.i,:"""",'._,<t-Total Bid Amount (w/Tax)::t,~,.!';1';:.~~..6~~ Percent of Engineer's Estimate: NA 7,500.00 S?~7:50Ci;00; s 5.000.00 900.00 '$.f~:goo~oo: $ 1,848.15 2,000.00 ;S~~'2:00Ö:OO: $ 1,980.00 1,000.00 :$ ~,ÜOO:oo" S 171.85 5.00 s<"r'~'£¡5(Ú)0' $ 6.60 700.00 f';¡~1io'o:00: $ 844.87 55,50 $"<20',257,50 $ 55.50 S ,d":;;'832:50 $ 35,73 51.00 S' 18,360.00 $ 31,58 50.00 S';:' 4.500:00 S 26.31 500.00 'S:~,~,"'500.00 S 1,221.15 2.00 .S';<¿.,1,660:00 S 1.34 40.00 S',!)2:320'.00' s 28.03 1,500.00 S "!i!oi:1;sbb:oo, $ 2,384.12 1,500.00 S~~:¡: fo500'.OO $ 2,516.12 0.10 $'~~530:00 $ 0.93 0.10 $::':!')..~75:00': $ 16.90 Jc.~'."""iI.7~~Yil' ""J"~'~. '!!1i'!."'- 10.00 S;;1':2;300:00" $ 20.00 $ ~~~ 4;08Ö~00' S 100.00 . $ tit;': 800:00 ~ S 10.00 S'~;"1;4ÓO,OÓ S 0,10 $~29~50' $ 7.00 $~:i\R1;085~00 S 1 Mobilization 2 Temp. Water PoliutioniErosion Control 3 Contractor Surveying 4 Traffic Control 5 Remove Asphalt Concrete Pavement 6 Abandon Septic Tank 7 Ductile Iron Sewer Pipe 8 in Dia. 8 Ductile Iron Sewer Pipe 6 In Dia 9 PVC Sanitary Sewer Pipe 8 ,n D,arTl 1 0 PVC Sanitary Sewer ?Ipe 6 in DiarTl 11 Connection to Sewer Slruc:ure 12 Testing Sewer Pipe 13 Cor. Polyethylene Culvert Pipe 12"Dio. 14 Manhole 48-ln. Dia. T.1, wfLocking Lid 15 Manhole 48-ln. Dia. T.3, wfLocking Lid 16 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B 17 Structure Excavation Class B CY LF EA CY CY CY 18 Structure Excavation Class 13 Incl. Haul 19 PVC Sanitary Sewer Pipe 4" D;alTI, 20 Side Sewer Cleanout 21 Roadway Excavation 22 Embankment Compaction 23 Select Borrow. Incl. Haul (Import) Driveway Restoration (Crushed Surfacing 24 Top Course) TON 160 25 ACP for Pavement Restoration TON 23 26 Seeding, Fertilizing and Mulching ACRE 0.18 27 Quarry Spalls for Slope Stabilization CY 50 28 Construction Geotex::ie for Soil Stabi!. SY 74 230 204 8 140 295 155 S 10.00 S 25.00 S 100 S 5.00 S 5.00 S 16.00 ..,C,.. 19.84 150.00 6.622.00 63.37 1":,,t":¡¡""""'I\;h"~;¡ ',:... ,,';~;"""<',"~ ,;,.' ,,-',-'"',',. "..' "."',.' ',"J", C' ,',f ""C>4"""""""¡~6w¡-a;. ~. ""':,:¡¡"""<,, ""',!:"~;;;:;;'11:'1 ",., '/,i'.',',',. ," ,','y", , ,." , 164.0% Page 1 Printed: 6/8/2004 RF8 04-112 BelLacarinoWoodsSewerExtension- 6idT abs.xls MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# ~:~ ............................ ........................-...............-....................... ..........-........................ .......--................ ...............-................ ..........................-............................... ......................--.................. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat Modifications, File No. 98-104394-00-SU CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT cg RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0 $0 $none ATTACHMENTS: June 15,2004, staff report with attachments to City CouncillLand Use/ Transportation Committee, including draft Final Plat Resolution. .......................................................... SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The applicant has proposed modifications to a preliminary plat that was approved by the City Council on October 16, 2001. Specifically, the applicant has requested to modify the clearing and grading limits of the approved Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat, and modify the location ofthe two access points onto Hoyt Road SW. Modifications to the preliminary plat, will result in five fewer lots, reconfiguring the road and lot layout, modifications to the open space, and modifications to the location of the stormwater facility. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC voted to recommend to the full City Council approval ofthe Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat modifications, finding the modifications in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat. PROPOSED MOTION: ") move approval of the Resolution approving the Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat modifications." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .............~.. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDfDEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # D~AFT .ç (2- 'If Ý A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, MODIFYING THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE COTTAGES AT HOYT ROAD, FEDERAL WAY FILE NO. 98-104394-00 SUo RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, on November 16, 1998, the applicant, Mr. Rick Williams, applied to the City of Federal Way for preliminary plat approval to subdivide certain real property known as the Cottages at Hoyt Road and consisting of 16.4 acres into forty (40) single family residential lots located in the 33300 Block of Hoyt Road SW, on the east side of the street; and WHEREAS, on May 26,200 I, a Mitigated Determination of Non significance (MDNS) was issued by the Director of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A), RCW 43.21 C; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Council Resolution 01-349, on October 16, 200 I, the City Council approved the Cottages at Hoyt Road 40-lot preliminary plat, in compliance with Chapter 20 of the Federal Way City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicable City Codes; and WHEREAS, the Cottages at Hoyt Road plat has not yet been constructed; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. Richard Williams, has authorized Trinity Land Development and Barghausen Consulting Engineers to act as agent for the preliminary plat for the Cottages at Hoyt Road and the applicant has requested to: revise access locatiòns on Hoyt Road SW, revise grading limits, reduce the lot count to 35 lots, revise the open space configuration, reconfigure the road and lot layout, and revise the location of the stormwater facility, and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2004, the City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee (LUTe) considered the request for the preliminary plat revision, found the revised preliminary plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat, and voted to forward a recommendation for approval of the Cottages at Hoyt Road revised preliminary plat to the full City Council; and Res. # , Page I Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adoption of Findings of Fact and Conclusions. The findings offact and conclusion of the Department of Community Development Services June 15, 2004 memorandum and recommendation to the LUTC, are hereby adopted as the findings and conclusion of the Federal Way City Council. Any finding deemed to be a conclusion, and any conclusion deemed to be a finding, shall be treated as such. Section 2. Application Approval. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-136(b), based upon the recommendation of the Department of Community Development Services and findings and conclusion contained therein as adopted by the City Council immediately above, the revised preliminary plat for the Cottages at Hoyt Road, Federal Way File No. 98-104394-00-SU, is hereby found to be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat, and such revisions are hereby approved subject to all requirements of the Federal Way City Code and conditions contained and referenced in City Council Resolution 01-349. Section 3. Conditions of Approval Integral. The conditions of approval of the preliminary plat are all integral to each other with respect to the City Counci I finding that the public use and interest will be served by the platting or subdivision of the subject property. Should any court having j urisdiction over the subject matter declare any ofthe conditions invalid, then, in said event, the proposed preliminary plat approval granted in this resolution shall be deemed void, and the preliminary plat shall be remanded to the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner to review the impacts of the inval idation of any condition or conditions and conduct such additional proceedings as are necessary to assure that the proposed plat makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare and other factors as required by RCW Chapter 58.17 and applicable City ordinances, rules, and regulations, and forward such recommendation to the City Council for further action. Res. # , Page 2 Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, THIS - DAY OF ,2004. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MA YOR, DEAN MCCOLGAN A TIEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC ApPROVED As To FORM: CITY ATIORNEY, PATRICIAA. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED By THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION No. Res. # . Page 3 ~ CITY OF ~ Federal Way CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO RAND UM To: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee FROM: ~athy M~Clun~, Director of Comwunity Development Services Jim Hams, Semor Planne{;J~ ÅY~. David osele i a~ VIA: RE: Cottages at Ho Road Revised Preliminary Plat Application No's. 98-104394-00-SU and 04-102107-AD DATE: June 15, 2004 I. STAFF RECOMMENDA nON Staff recommends the Land Use and Transportation Committee forward to the City Council a recommendation to approve the proposed modifications of the Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat, finding that the modified preliminary plat is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat. II. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant has proposed modifications to a preliminary plat that was approved by the City Council on October 16, 200 I (Exhibits I and 2). Specifically, the applicant has requested to modify the clearing and grading limits of the approved preliminary plat, and modify the location of the two access points onto Hoyt Road SW. Modifications to the preliminary plat, will result in five fewer lots, reconfiguring the road and lot layout, modifications to the open space, and modifications to the location of the stormwater facility. III. BACKGROUND As identified in the June 3,2004, Barghausen Consulting Engineers letter (Exhibit 3), the applicant has determined that the approved preliminary plat design is not feasible or practical to construct, has not been designed to accommodate the existing site characteristics and grade constraints, results in lots with slopes of two feet horizontal to one foot vertical (50 percent slope) extending up to three- fourths the depth of the upper lots, and would ultimately require approximately 140,000 cubic yards of excess soil to be exported from the site for construction of the roadway infrastructure improvements and the homes. IV. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 20-136(b), amongst several criteria, the City Council must ultimately find the final plat..in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat. As detailed in Section V below, the proposed plat modification results in some changes to the approved preliminary plat layout. Therefore, City staff is requesting the City Council determine if proposed modifications to the approved preliminary plat are in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat. Criteria contained in FWCC Section 20-127 also can provide a benchmark as to the significance of the proposed modifications. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-127, when the Hearing Examiner has forwarded a recommendation on a preliminary plat application to the City Council, the City Council may require or approve a minor modification to the preliminary plat if: 1. 2. The change will not have the effect of increasing the residential density of the plat; The change will not result in the relocation of any access point to an exterior street from the plat; The change will not result in any loss of open space area or buffering provided in the plat; and The City detennines that the change will not increase any adverse impacts or undesirable effects of the project and that the change does not significantly alter the project. 3. 4. Although these criteria no longer apply to the current proposal, they do provide factors for the City Council to consider regarding whether the modifications are major or minor, and ultimately whether the final plat would be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat. V. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION 1. FWCC Section 20-179 only allows plat construction to include clearing and grading for approved infrastructure (e.g. streets and utilities) as depicted on the engineering plans. The remainder ofthe plat is typically cleared in conjunction with home construction. Due to unusual topographic constraints at the site, the applicant proposes to clear and grade the plat infrastructure concurrently with clearing and grading all of the developed portion of the individual building lots. If approved as requested, the revised plat will result in more initial clearing and grading than is pennitted on the approved preliminary plat. The currently approved preliminary plat only allows clearing and grading for the plat infrastructure and some limited areas of clearing and grading beyond the right-of-ways and utility corridors. As identified in the June 3, 2004, Barghausen Consulting Engineers letter, with the existing preliminary plat, approximately 80,000 cubic yards of soils material must be moved to conduct the roadway and utility improvements for the currently approved plat. Then, after the final plat is recorded, extensive further clearing and grading of approximately 60,000 cubic yards of additional excess material will need to be hauled off-site at the time of construction of individual homes. Land Use and Transportation Committee Cottages at Hoyt Road Revised Preliminary Plat / 98-1 04394-00-SU June 15, 2004 Page 2 Condensing the majority of the site earthwork into one phase will result in more initial visual impact at the site than would result from the approved preliminary plat. However, conducting the majority of the clearing and grading into one consolidated phase will result in less construction impacts to the surrounding streets, as less soils will be hauled off site, and the bulk of the earthwork will be conducted during the initial clearing and grading phase. 2. The modified preliminary plat will result in preservation of a comparable or greater amount of existing mature vegetation than would be preserved by developing the approved preliminary plat. 3. The modified preliminary plat will result in elimination of two interior cul-de-sac bulbs, and relocation of the main interior street, approximately 50 feet east of the currently approved location. 4. The preliminary plat modifications will result in revision to the location of both access points onto Hoyt Road SW. The applicant has requested to move the access points in order to provide additional roadway length to elevate the roadway grades to better accommodate the existing terrain of the property, resulting in less site grading. Relocation of the access points onto Hoyt Road SW will not create additional impacts to the surrounding area, as the northern access point is proposed to be relocated approximately 400 feet north, and the southern access point is proposed to be moved approximately 200 feet south of the currently approved locations. 5. The applicant has provided a preliminary sight distance analysis identifying that the proposed access points can meet applicable sight distance requirements. If the plat modification is approved by the City Council, prior to approval of plat construction plans and commencing construction, the applicant will be required to provide a final sight distance analysis in accordance with applicable standards; and provide written assurance to the City that any improvements such as clearing, grading, and/or obtaining off-site easements or right-of-way dedication can be secured by the applicant and provided to the City. 6. The preliminary plat modifications result in five fewer lots than the approved preliminary plat. 7. The preliminary plat modifications result in preserving more constrained on-site open space than the existing approved plat. However, no usable open space is provided on-site and a fee-in-lieu of on-site open space will be required to meet FWCC Section 20-155, consistent with the approved preliminary plat. 8. Al O-foot wide arterial landscape buffer in a separate landscape tract is required along Hoyt Road SW in compliance with FWCC Section 20-178 consistent with the approved preliminary plat. 9. The Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) proposed along the east side of the site results in a comparable width ofNGPE as the approved preliminary plat. If the preliminary plat modifications are approved, strict provisions regarding vegetation removal, reciprocal easements, and prohibition of all structures will be required on the final plat in order to be consistent with the intent of the open space tract on the approved preliminary plat. 10. The preliminary plat modification is subject to all applicable codes and policies as well as all findings, conclusions, and conditions of approval contained in the original preliminary plat approval, City Council Resolution No. 01-349 and the September 6, 2001, Hearing Examiner's recommendation. Land Use and Transportation Committee Cottages at Hoyt Road Revised Preliminary Plat / 98-1 04394-00-SU June 15, 2004 Page 3 Conclusion: Based on findings 1 - 10 above, the preliminary plat modifications as proposed are in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat. Further, based on FWCC Section 20- 127(d) the proposed modifications to the preliminary plat will not increase the density of the plat; will not result in substantive relocation of an access point to an exterior street; will not result in loss of buffering or open space; and will not increase any adverse impacts or undesirable effects of the project. VI. COUNCIL ACTION A draft resolution finding the modified preliminary plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat is attached (Exhibit 4). After consideration of the request, the City Council may, by action approved by a majority of the total membership, take one of the following actions, pursuant to FWCC Section 20-136(b). 1. Adopt the staff recommendation finding the preliminary plat modifications in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat, and the applicant may proceed to engineering design and construction of the modified preliminary plat; or 2. Find that the preliminary plat modification revision is not in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat, and reject the request for a revision to the preliminary plat, requiring the applicant to file a new preliminary plat application. EXHIBITS 1. 2. 3. 4. Approved Preliminary Plat for the Cottages at Hoyt Road Modified Preliminary Plat for the Cottages at Hoyt Road. June 3, 2004, Letter by Dan Balmelli, P.E., from Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc. Draft City Council Resolution Finding the Modified Preliminary Plat in Conformance with the Approved Preliminary Plat. ApPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT ¿7 /gL ~ ( / ric Faison, Member -- Land Use and Transportation Committee Cottages at Hoyt Road Revised Preliminary Plat / 98-104394-00-SU June 15,2004 Page 4 ~ Fëderal Way MEMORANDUM Community Development Services, Depa rtment NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC MEETING Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat Revision Federal Way File No's 98-104394-00-SU & 04-102107-AD Notice is hereby given that the Federal Way City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee (LUTe) will hold a public meeting at 5:30 p.m., or soon thereafter, on June 21, 2004, in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33530 First Way South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, W A 98063-9718) for the following project. Project Name: Proposed Revisions to the Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat The City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services has received a request to modify the Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat, which was approved by the City Council on October 16, 2001. The approved preliminary plat is for the subdivision of 16.4 acres into 40 single-family residential lots. The proposed Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat is located along the east side of Hoyt Road SWat approximately the 33300 block, in Federal Way, W A. The applicant has requested to modify the clearing and grading limits of the approved preliminary plat, and modify the location of the two access points onto Hoyt Road SW. The modification to the preliminary plat, if approved, will result in five fewer lots than the currently approved preliminary plat. The revised preliminary plat, if approved, also results in reconfiguring the road and lot layout, and modifies the location of the stormwater facility. Any person may participate in the public meeting by submitting written comments to the Land Use and Transportation Committee either by delivering comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the meeting, by giving them directly to the LUTC at the meeting, or by appearing at the meeting and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The LUTC will issue a recommendation to the full City Council on the preliminary plat revision. The application is to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies ofthe City of Federal Way. You are being notified of this meeting because you have previously provided public comments or testimony on the proposal. The official file is available for review during working hours in the Department of Community Development Services, 33530 First Way South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. The staff report to the LUTC will be available for review approximately one week before the meeting. Questions regarding this proposal should be directed to Jim Harris, Senior Planner, at jim.harriS@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-661-4019. 04-102107 Doc. I.D 27706 ~ ~ ~ IF II 7 IÍI ¡a ~ I ~ II I! it }aÕ It II I -¡ ¡¡ ~ ~ Q: !;::....~ C~3 :t:)..:E II: ""~ð oq:~ìi: øll~a2S ~a:~ ~ 8 Exhibit 1 Cottages at Hoyt Road Approved Preliminary Plat 10116/01 I I~ N 00'49"2(r E '~ PRQ.ECT"" ...-,........SU .-- SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE .3 EAST, W.M. S 0032'42- W a ~ I-- <1: --J Q :2: ~ ~!il~ ~ ~ U) ~ ~ GIUPIUC SClll! fro.... .....LJ-L" T ,._, .",-- ~ 23 11 22 - <', 19,. : H/Ç;H ~O/NT PAfK Qlv. " " 18 " 19 , 14 ' 15 " 16 ' 17' " " :¡$1DIII/~ \ " "" '- 'BDlUTTOF"",::'r":- " -' ' , , ""NaJfl(JrnOlJ1 , ... 21 , , , 13 "20 , , ~ 'II" ~ 12 , , "'/ .-.', ------~ , L___n-u--_n_n"_~""" \ -------------, 'II' ..._-r--7RÄCT-~=' ~_/~ ::; a ~ ,,' Q ,,' <::c", Q I-- 11 :2: CS--- Q ----- 1:: 1 0 ~ // -c1f »~ IG> I - 0: " III I 1\1 III I '~\ \ I I I \ 31 ~ i' ~PJ. I ""I '"', "f-"'" ,Jo,j HJr,C .",,",: "'<, t ':'\,-¡~ '" :~~,-'ii") ~~~0 -5'1)~1-IQ~ 0/' 'o/i<!' ."" -.. """," ~ ¡:¡:: ;;., "d ¡; g ,5 ç¿ ,9 '" >,"E :Ë:i:::;e ,- - " ,r; .c"'t;;~ >< en ,- \D ¡.;¡ ~"8 ,:0;:2: Õ"d u" :s P- o ¿: 9: N'1ld NOI1'1:)I::i100>'1 ONlal¡'~O ŒSOdO!:Jd lN3~dOl3^3a aN'fl ,uINIIH """'O, ""-' """0 ~iis ~ i:. ~ ~ 'ç ~ ; .~,~" i ~ õ: Ô ," ..' '.../ , Iii ~ "! ~ J; / ,,' " ': \,~', .. .. ',,~ , ',:"', ';' : ;:, .~: ", ,~ ., . ',- , '3'" >' ."z :~; , ' ,:: ";, " ",:') I " . J;'" :' . ..,¡ , , .- '0 ' ..¡.; ,> ,.. ' , " , t... /'\ r". , i.. ~ , ~ ~ F.. ~GHAV f~, .'S', ~ % ~' ~ ~(" ~"" <>-, ~~ "'G ENG\~ CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES June 3, 2004 HAND DELNERY :¡ t~ (' ¡ ¡ ¡.-. [\ :1 : T"T ¡= f~'\ ",""I-'-""",,!I,,",\,"¡¡\¡ i\ao'L' 'ì,;~_\""'.J!.,~j¡'.!~¡! ¡ t-,., . Jim Harris City of Federal Way Planning Department 33530 - 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 JUN 0 3 2004 c>vl ... /0 ';).1 ()( - AD RE: Submittal of Revised Preliminary Comprehensive Grading Plan, Cross-Sections, and Sight Distance Study for The Cottages at Hoyt Road City of Federal Way File No. 98-104393-00-SE Our Job No. 11432 Dear Jim: As requested in the May 21, 2004 letter from Kathy McClung, and our subsequent meeting on June 2, 2004, we are submitting plans, cross-sections, and site distance analysis for your review and consideration of a minor modification to the original plat of "The Cottages at Hoyt Road." As you know, our office has been assisting Trinity Land Development, LLc., in completing a feasibility analysis and preliminary civil engineering design services for the "Cottages at Hoyt Road" residential subdivision project. Due to existing grade constraints on the property and from a detailed analysis of the original roadway and lot layout, it has been determined that the project, as currently designed and approved by the City, is not feasible or practical to construct, has not been designed to accommodate the existing site characteristics and grade constraints, results in lots with slopes of 2H:1V extending up to 3/4 of the depth of the upper lots, and would ultimately require approximately 140,000 cubic yards of excess soil to be exported from the site for construction of the roadway infrastructure improvements and the residential homes. The project was originally designed by another fmu and approved by the City of Federal Way as a 40-lot subdivision with two access points from Hoyt Road, a loop road, and two culs-de-sac. The proposed modification maintains two access points and a loop road from Hoyt Road; however, the access points have been moved closer to both ends of the property in order to provide additional roadway length to elevate the road grades to better accommodate the existing terrain of the property and the two culs-de-sac have been eliminated. The open space tracts and buffers, shown on the original plat, would be maintained and a significant increase in the area of permanent, undisturbed, open space buffers would be realized under the proposed modification. The stormwater facility would be located generally in the same location as the original design, and the total number of proposed lots would be reduced from 40 to approximately 35. A summary of the overall improvements and reduction of impacts from the proposed plat modifications are indicated below. 1. Significant reduction in soil excavation prior to final plat recording Under the current plan, approximately 80,000 cubic yards of excess material will need to be exported from the site in order to construct the roadway, storm, and utility infrastructure , 3 improvements. EXHIBIT PAGE---L-OF l.{ 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES. OLYMPIA. WA . TEMECULA, CA . WALNUT CREEK, CA www.h~rnh"'I""n r.nm Jim Harris City of Federal Way Planning Department -2- June 3, 2004 Under the proposed design, earthwork required for the roadway and utility improvements will result in an approximately balanced site with approximately 35,000 cubic yards of cut and fill. 2. Significant reduction in soil export required after final plat to construct homes Under the original plan, once the roadway and utility improvements are completed, extensive excavation and export of material will still be required to prepare the lots for construction of new homes due to the resulting 2: 1 slopes that will be created on nearly all of the upper lots. This will result in approximately 60,000 cubic yards of additional excess export material that will need to be hauled off the site. Under the proposed plan, very little additional earthwork and grading will be required since the future lot grades will be established as part of the construction of the roadway through the balanced earthwork design. 3. Reduction of exposure to erosion through reduction in slope areas prior to home construction Under the current design, significantly more disturbance and potential for erosion will occur as a result of the steep slopes created along nearly all of the upper lots during the roadway and utility construction phase. Although these slopes will be required to be stabilized, significant excavation and disturbance to all of the lots will again be required during construction of the homes to prepare the building pads. This significant disturbance, excavation, and export of material from the site will continue throughout the construction phase of the homes, which is anticipated to be completed within two years. Under the proposed modification, much less disturbance, excavation, and export will be required for construction of the homes since the flat pad sites will be essentially created during the roadway construction work. The disturbed areas can then be stabilized after construction of the roadway improvements and remain stabilized during the home construction phase, significantly reducing the potential for erosion. 4. Addition of permanent tree protection area along Hoyt Road Under the current plan, no permanent undisturbed buffer will be provided along Hoyt Road and a majority of the northeast corner of the site will be cleared and extensively graded to create new lots. Under the proposed modification, a 40- to 50-foot-wide by approximately 6oo-foot-long strip of native trees and vegetation will be maintained as a permanent buffer along Hoyt Road as shown on the enclosed plans. In addition, the entire northeast corner of the site will remain undisturbed except for minimal grading and sloping as required for construction of the roadway. The amount of permanently undisturbed area under the original approved grading plan is approximately 2.4 acres. The amount of permanently undisturbed area under the proposed modifIcation is 7.1 acres. EXHIBIT '3 PAGE -Z OF ~ Jim Harris City of Federal Way Planning Department -3- June 3, 2004 5. Significant reduction in truck traffic associated with reduced soils export both before and after recording of the final plat. Under the current plan, approximately 4,700 truck trips will be required to remove the :!: 80,000 cubic yards of excess fill from the site during the roadway, storm, and utility infrastructure phase. These truck trips will create an increased impact to the public from increased traffic on the streets, additional noise impacts, additional wear and tear on the public roadways, and additional street cleaning from dirt and debris from the truck tires. After completion of the roadway and utility improvements, an additional approximately 3,500 truck trips will be required to export the:!: 60,000 cubic yards of excess fill material from the residential lots once the homebuilders begin construction necessary to prepare the lots for future homes. This will again create significant additional impacts to the public. Under the proposed plat revision, very little, if any, excess fill material will need to be hauled off site during construction of the roadway and utility phase or the home construction phase since the project will be designed to balance as close as possible. Normal stripping and unsuitable duff material will need to be hauled off site during the initial construction phase; however, this work is required under both the current and proposed designs. 6. Reduced number of lots Under the current plan, 40 new residential lots are proposed, most of which have not been designed to fit the existing terrain. Under the proposed modification, 35 much more buildable lots are proposed, resulting in a reduction of five lots and a significant amount of additional -permanently undisturbed area. 7. Significant increase in size of Tract E NGP A (Native Growth Protection Area) Under the proposed modification, Lots 35, 36, and 37 have been eliminated and the majority of these lot areas have been converted to permanent open space. 8. Site distance analysis We have completed an updated site distance analysis based on the proposed modification and have confirmed that both the north and the south entrances meet entering and stopping site distance based on the adjusted entrance locations. As clearly shown by the information above, the proposed modification will result in a residential project that significantly reduces all environmental impacts to the general public, provides significantly more undisturbed native buffer, provides a project design that accommodates the existing site terrain, reduces impacts on the public roadway system, and results in. a much more feasible, practical, and cost-effective development while still reducing the overall number of lots from 40 to a maximum of 35. EXHIBIT 3 PAGE 3 OF .....!:1- Jim Harris City of Federal Way Planning Department -4- June 3, 2004 Given the information above. it is our opinion that the revisions proposed to the project should be considered as a minor amendment because of the si2nificantly reduced 2radin2 and earthwork volumes. increased amount of permanently undisturbed site area. and reduced impacts to the environment and 2eneral public. The following plans and documentation are enclosed for your review: 1. Four copies of the original plat layout and grading plan, indicating highlighted tract and buffer locations, roadway layout, and lot layout. 2. Four copies of specific cross-sections through the site under the original design, indicating the cuts and fills and undisturbed buffers. 3. Four copies of the proposed plat modification, indicating the proposed roadway layout, lot layout, tracts, and highlighted undisturbed buffers. 4. Four copies of specific cross-sections through the project site under the proposed plat modification, indicating the cuts and fills and undisturbed buffers. 5. Four copies of the updated geotechnical engineering letter prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. 6. Four copies of the additional topographic/as-built survey and profile of Hoyt Road extending south of the southerly proposed driveway, indicating the existing and proposed sight lines necessary to meet the required entering sight distance. 7. Four copies of the updated site distance analysis, including a plan, profile, and section of the south entrance's southerly site line, exhibits, and photographs. Once you have reviewed the enclosed information, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. kb~ Daniel K. Balmelli, P.E. Executive Vice President DKB/tep/athlbd 11432c.001.doc enc: As Noted cc: Chris Austin, Trinity Land Development, LLc. (w/enc) Allison Moss, Dearborn & Moss P.LLC. (w/enc) Rick Williams, Preferred Building Contractors, Inc. Ali Sadr, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. EXHIBIT 3 PAGE L{ OF .!L {Q"~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, MODIFYING THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE COTTAGES AT HOYT ROAD, FEDERAL WAY FILE NO. 98-104394-00 SUo WHEREAS, on November 16, 1998, the applicant, Mr. Rick Williams, applied to the City of Federal Way for preliminary plat approval to subdivide certain real property known as the Cottages at Hoyt Road and consisting of 16.4 acres into forty (40) single family residential lots located in the 33300 Block of Hoyt Road SW, on the east side ofthe street; and WHEREAS, on May 26,2001, a Mitigated Determination of Non sign ificance (MDNS) was issued by the Director of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Council Resolution 01-349, on October 16, 2001, the City Council approved the Cottages at Hoyt Road 40-10t preliminary plat, in compliance with Chapter 20 of the Federal Way City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicable City Codes; and WHEREAS, the Cottages at Hoyt Road plat has not yet been constructed; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. Richard Williams, has authorized Trinity Land Development and Barghausen Consulting Engineers to act as agent for the preliminary plat for the Cottages at Hoyt Road and the applicant has requested to: revise access locations on Hoyt Road SW, revise grading limits, reduce the lot count to 35 lots, revise the open space configuration, reconfigure the road and lot layout, and revise the location of the stormwater facility, and WHEREAS, on June 21,2004, the City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee (LUTC) considered the request for the preliminary plat revision, found the revised preliminary plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat, and voted to forward a recommendation for approval of the Cottages at Hoyt Road revised preliminary plat to the full City Council; and Res. # , Page I EXHIBIT Lj PAGE 1 OF-3- Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adoption of Findings of Fact and Conclusions. The findings offact and conclusion of the Department of Community Development Services June 15, 2004 memorandum and recommendation to the LUTC, are hereby adopted as the findings and conclusion of the Federal Way City Council. Any finding deemed to be a conclusion, and any conclusion deemed to be a finding, shall be treated as such. Section 2. Application Approval. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-136(b), based upon the recommendation of the Department of Community Development Services and findings and conclusion contained therein as adopted by the City Council immediately above, the revised preliminary plat for the Cottages at Hoyt Road, Federal Way File No. 98-104394-00-SU, is hereby found to be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat, and such revisions are hereby approved subject to all requirements of the Federal Way City Code and conditions contained and referenced in City Council Resolution 01-349. Section 3. Conditions of Approval Integral. The conditions of approval of the preliminary plat are all integral to each other with respect to the City Council finding that the public use and interest will be served by the platting or subdivision of the subject property. Should any court havingjurisdiction over the subject matter declare any of the conditions invalid, then, in said event, the proposed preliminary plat approval granted in this resolution shall be deemed void, and the preliminary plat shall be remanded to the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner to review the impacts ofthe invalidation of any condition or conditions and conduct such additional proceedings as are necessary to assure that the proposed plat makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare and other factors as required by RCW Chapter 58.17 and applicable City ordinances, rules, and regulations, and forward such recommendation to the City Council for further action. Res. # . Page 2 EXHIBIT -.Y PAGE :2 OF ,3 Section 4. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affinned. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, THIS - DAY OF ,2004. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, DEAN MCCOLGAN A TrEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC ApPROVED As To FORM: CITY ATrORNEY, PATRICIAA. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED By THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION No. Res. # , Page 3 EXHIBIT -!{ PAGE 3 OF 3 MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# ~ (t) ....................--......-...-.-............................... ....................-.................-..,.........-.-..""'.""""""""'..-.-..."""" ""'....."...."""""""""'-"""".........................""'" """""""""""",,--"""""""'....... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ¡;g CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ """-....-..---.--.---..""-""""'...-....... .. .............. ""'-'-.....-.-'--....-......-""""""""'............""" .....-.---..--.-...-.-....-.-...-- '-..""""'" ........................-..-....----.......---.--..--.. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Memorandum, Proposed Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration ----"------'-...........-...........................................-..-.....--....--...----....-----.--.....--.-.-- . --,,-,--'..........................,.........."'" ....... "..,.. _......... ..---.-,---,--.----..-.---- SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: As part of the City's effort to reduce jail costs, the City negotiated for jail services at other jails. Subsequently King County indicated that they anticipated there would not be any space for the cities' misdeamants in in the King County jail in the near future. Several King County cities joined together to negotiate jail sevices from Yakima County and from King County. The proposed interlocal agreement, in effect, implements the existing agreements and plans for the future. It clarifies the roles of cities in planning, implementation, operation, and administration ofthe interlocal agreements related to the provision of current jail services; plans for future facilities and programs for municipal inmates; and establishes a payment method for unused beds. See attached memo for infonnation on the governance structure of the agreement. """"-"""""'-"""--'----.........." """'--""""'--........-.....................-....... .............,._,_""""'"""""""""""" ...............--......-....-....... ......._...........................' .......__.....-.._.............__.................................. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward the Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration to the full City Council on July 6, 2004 with a do pass recommendation. """""""-"----"'-'-""""""'.. .......-............--.............-.--...... .......--.,--...............--.......... .............-,...-......................-.-....-....... PROPOSED MOTION: "'I move approval of the Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration." ~~AGER APPROV AL~"'-~- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) """""""""""""""'....,...........--....... ..""""'..---......-........ COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.E CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL PARKS/RECREATION/HUMAN SERVICES/ PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE June 14, 2004 Meeting Date: May 27,2004 Patricia A. Richardson, City Attorney fPl~ David H. M~anager Interlocal Agreem~t for Jail Administration From: Via: Subject: Back2round: The cities within King County have been working on developing a method to administer the King County and Yakima County jail contracts, and to plan for the future. The attached memorandum from the City Manager highlights the provisions in the proposed Interlocal Agreement, which creates three main groups. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee approve the proposed Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration and forward it to full council for consideration. Committee Recommendation: The Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee recommends approval of the proposed Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration and forward it to full council for consideration at the July 6, 2004, City Council meeting. / \./ K:\agnditem\PRHSPS committee\jag interlocal E -\ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Memorandum DATE: May 17, 2004 TO: City Council FROM: David Moseley, City Manager SUBJECT: JAG- King County Interlocal Agreements Purpose This Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration provides the framework for cities within King County to work together to manage the King County and Yakima County jail contracts, dispose of property held for jail purposes by Bellevue and develop a plan to manage the cities' inmate population after the termination of the King County Jail Contract in 2012. Background For the past three years, cities within King County have discussed how best to provide jail services to city inmates. Of the 39 cities within King County, 37 cities contract with King County for Jail Services (Kent and Enumc1aw are not parties), 35 cities in King County contract with Yakima County for Jail services, and 16 cities contract with the City of Renton. Several other cities have contracts with other cities and counties. For the past several months, cities have been working on many different issues related to the requirement to phase out of King County jails and other treatment facilities. This new direction places new burdens on the cities over the next several years. A policy summary follows this memorandum that highlights the policy and program implications that have already been made in existing interlocal agreements and a summary of some of the future policy decisions that lay ahead of us (Attachment B) This interlocal agreement specifically is created to do the following: . Clarify Roles of Cities: in planning, implementation, operation and administration of interlocal agreements related to the provision of current jail services; . Plan for the Future: of facilities and programs for municipal inmates; and, . Establish Payment Method for Unused Beds: should the Cities collectively fail to meet their estimated Minimum Bed Commitment with Yakima County. It does this by creating a governance structure which: . implements the administration group created by the King County Jail Contract; K:\MEMOIJAG agenda brief 4-29-04 revise. DOC Page 1 ~-2- . creates a group in order to facilitate cooperation in the examination of policy issues, questions and/or disputes involving the administration of the King County Jail Contract and the Yakima Jail Contract; disposition of the Jail Property proceeds; and, and the planning for new misdemeanant secure jail facilities, non-secure alternative facilities or programs to create additional misdemeanant capacity. . . This interlocal agreement does not decide the outcomes of future planning efforts, nor does it bind any city to participate in these efforts. It sets up a cooperative process to create the plan for how these future efforts will be undertaken. Governance Model To accomplish these tasks, the Jail Administration interlocal agreement creates: . three different committees with specific responsibilities - see below and Attachment A . an annual budget and assessment method for all cities to pay for staff support . a fiscal agent (currently Tukwila) to manage fiscal responsibilities The three main groups created are as follows: 1. Oversight Group of Elected Officials - Assembly Membership: An Elected Official from each participating city. Purpose: The Assembly will meet at least once a year to provide guidance to the JAG and JOG. This will include issues such as annual budget, assessment and work program, disposition of jail property, new misdemeanant facility, fiscal agent and other policies as necessary. 2. Administrative Entity - JAG- (Jail Administrative Group)- Membership: A group of 6 City representatives with 1 from Seattle, 1 from Bellevue, and 4 other contract cities, one of which will include an SCA city that is the largest jail user and is party to both the King County and Yakima County ILAs. Purpose: The JAG will administer this and other jail related agreements. This will include making recommendations to the Assembly, working closely with the JOG, and supervising staff. These 6 members will also serve as the city representatives to the King County JAG. 3. Operations Entity - JOG - Jail Operations Group Membership: A representative from each of the cities Purpose: Advise the Assembly and JOG on operational issues of the jail contracts. Term: The agreement continues until December 31,2012 which is the termination date of the King County Contract. It can be renewed. Termination: Cities can terminate by written notice by the end of any given year, but remain responsible for any budget expenses incurred for that year. Assessment: The annual assessment is based on city population and cities usage of the Yakima County Jail. The assessment for each City is enclosed in Attachment C. K:\MEMO\JAG agenda brief 4-29-04 revise.DOC Page 2 E-S Attachment A: Overview of Governance Structure Interlocal Agreement on Jail Administration 39 Cities Governance -Each City Council Ratifies Jail Oversight Assembly (Assembly) Elected Officials from all 39 Cities Represented . Legislative Elected Oversight Policy; budget; work program Siting; debt issuance; real estate; audit . . Jail Administration Group (JAG) Six King County ILA City Admin. Appointees . Provides recommendations to Assembly . Contract Admin - Four (plus future) interlocals . Manage work program/budget . Hire staff as provided by budget . Fiduciary responsibility for budget administration ., Jail Operations Group (JOG) 39 City Representatives . Daily operations issues . Advise JAG on contract problems/solutions . Develop operations procedures with 39 member cities K:\MEMOVAG agenda brief 4-29-04 revise. DOC Page 3 E: -~ Attachment B Policy and Program Implications from Other Interlocal Agreements Backe:round In 2000, the cities in King County used approximately 800 jail beds on a daily basis to house misdemeanor inmates; 622 beds at King County jail facilities and 188 beds at other facilities (e.g. city jails!). In 2002,37 cities signed a new Interlocal Agreement for Jail Services with King County; 35 cities signed an Interlocal Agreement with Yakima Count/. The agreements signed with King County and Yakima County will significantly change how and where j ail beds are used. 16 cities also signed agreements with Renton on coordination of transportation and population management. The three biggest changes resulting from these contracts are: . Cities will phase out use of King County's jails beginning 12/31/03 with a cap of 380 inmates and with full phase out by 2012. In the near term, jail caps require cities to reduce their use of King County facilities to 220 beds by July 2005. King County required and the cities agreed to stop using the King County Jail to house city misdemeanor inmates by December 31, 2012. From January - September 2003, the cities averaged 380 beds at the King County Jail. Population changes and annexations will likely require cities to plan for facilities and services that will serve as many as 500 misdemeanants per day by 2012 above those provided by Yakima. Cities have agreed to build or contract for the development of new facilities to house the misdemeanant beds needed (approximately 300-400 beds) to be available as the King County contract caps reduce access to its jails. Cities are obligated to seek new facilities or extend the Yakima agreement beyond 2010 to meet their capacity requirements. The cities have agreed to pay for an estimated 440 beds at the Yakima County Jail to house city misdemeanants effective October 1,2003. The cities are currently using between 265 - 275 beds at Yakima. The 440 beds in Yakima meet approximately half of the capacity requirements the cities will have to provide in order to fully phase out of King County. The Yakima contract does not guarantee that those 440 beds will be available beyond the year 2010. The Cities' JAG is negotiating with Yakima to resolve a number of contract interpretation and implementation issues. The Cities have agreed that the Bellevue land acquired by the County for future jail needs is to be transferred to the cities as the initial equity that is to be shared by all King County Cities in the development of future facilities for city misdemeanants. The cities have agreed to accept the transfer of property in Bellevue as equity for developing future secure capacity and/or building or contracting for alternative corrections facilities . . I Auburn, Enumclaw, Issaquah, Kent, Kirkland and Renton have their own city jails. 2 All cities except Kent and Enumclaw signed the agreement with King County; all cities except Kent, Enumclaw, Hunts Point and Milton signed the agreement with Yakima County. K:\MEMOVAG agenda brief 4-29-04 revise. DOC Page 4 ~-5 sufficient to allow the cities to completely pull out of the King County Jail by December, 31 2012. Kin2 County Interlocal A2reement The cities have agreed to work as one group with King County in the development of billing procedures, dispute resolution on common billing disputes or on behalf of a member city with an unresolved billing dispute. The County interlocal also delegates to the JAG all other administrative oversight responsibilities including population management. Finally, the JAG is responsible for limited re-opening negotiations in 2006 and 2009 for jail charges and med-psych holding procedures. Some of the major provisions in the interlocal agreement with King County include: . Section 3.3 - the cities have agreed to work with the County to develop a proportional billing system for inmates who are held on charges from multiple jurisdictions. . Section 4.2 - either the County or a city may refer a disputed billing to the Jail Agreement Administration Group (JAG) for resolution (JAG decisions may be subsequently appealed). . Section 10 establishes the Jail Agreement Administration Group (JAG). This group is authorized to act on behalf of all 37 cities to resolve issues related to administration, implementation or interpretation of the agreement including inmate transportation, alternative and community correction programs, coordination with the courts and law enforcement, mental health, drug and alcohol treatment, interpretation of the Jail Interlocal Agreement, and any re-opener of the contract as allowed in Section 7. . Section 10 also establishes the membership of the King County JAG: two representatives from King County, four representatives from the suburban cities, one representative from Bellevue, and one representative from Seattle. Binding limits on overall jail population capacity are agreed upon with specific deadlines for reductions. Separate medical and psychiatric population limits have been established. JAG is responsible for management of prisoners and defining release procedures when med-psych limits are exceeded. Absent procedures, the County may refuse to hold and may release these prisoners to the booking city on "last-in-first-out" procedure regardless of community risk. . Section 11 establishes binding capacity limits that apply to all 37 cities. The cities must reduce their jail population housed at King County to 380 inmates by 12/31/03; to 250 inmates by 12/31/04; to 220 inmates by 7/1/05; and to zero inmates by 12/31/12. If the cities exceed these limits, the County has the right to refuse city misdemeanant bookings. The contract also establishes separate capacity limits for the medical and psychiatric units; should these limits be exceeded, the County has the right to release city inmates in these units. Cities have agreed to hold in common the Bellevue property equity for future city misdemeanant jail purposes or to return the unused equity plus any income earned to the County by 2012. . Section 12 states that the County will transfer to the City of Bellevue, on behalf of all the cities, property located in Bellevue (informally known as the Overtake property). The property (or proceeds from the sale of the property) is to be used to contribute to the cost of building or contracting for secure capacity and/or building or contracting for alternative corrections facilities sufficient to enable the cities to completely end their use of the King County Jail. If the cities do not build/contract for additional secure or alternative capacity K:\MEMOVAG agenda brief 4-29-04 revise. DOC Page 5 G-~ sufficient to pull out ofthe King County Jail, the cities must transfer the property (or proceeds from the sale of the property) back to King County. Yakima County Interlocal Agreement Thirty-five cities have pledged to pay for an estimated 440 beds beginning 10/01/03. The cities have agreed to individual obligations for a certain number of beds and to share or "pool" the use of the beds to assure optimal use of their facility investments thereby reducing risk of paying for unused beds. The major provision in the interlocal agreement with Yakima County is in Section 7. Note: Some cities contract with the city of Renton to provide coordinated inmate transportation. Future Policv and Prol!ram Issues and a Timeframe Estimate. Given the population limits in key agreements with King County and Yakima, cities have obligated themselves to plan for future misdemeanant jail and alternative program needs. Cities have to figure out how to replace the capacity they will lose when the King County agreement ends. Questions facing the cities about planning new jail facilities include: . How should the cities replace the capacity that will be lost when the King County Interlocal Agreement ends in 2012? Should the cities work collectively to address this capacity need? . Should the cities build a new regional jail for misdemeanor inmates or should they build several new local jails throughout the County? . After the contract with King County ends, should the cities continue to send some of their inmates to Yakima County - or if a new misdemeanor facility is built locally, would it be more cost effective to house all inmates locally? . Should a new jail facility be a full service jail facility (similar to Yakima or King County) or should it be a minimum 30 day holding facility? . What decisions should be made and how soon should cities make the decisions about how to extend or replace Yakima services after 2010? Timing: after a decision is made to build a jail or other facility(ies) and funding is in place, it takes 4 - 6 years to go through the EIS, planning, design, and construction. An optimistic schedule for the development of new facilities follows below: 2004 - 2006: 0 Complete population management implementation procedures, information systems and transportation support for city misdemeanants 0 Forecast future jail use by the 37 cities 0 Identify treatment options, needs and types of facilities and locations' support the 37 cities depending on policy framework agreed upon by each city. 0 Establish financing mechanism - who issues the debt? Establish a PDA to use some other interlocal arrangements such as contract arrangements for delivery of jail services to cities 0 Negotiate long-term governance model for development and management of jail services in King County as well as services provided outside of King County 2006-2008: Initiate public siting process for the facilities 2008 to 2012: EIS, jail design, construction 2012: Testing and start-up operations for new jail and other misdemeanant facilities Jan.I,2013: Contract with King County has ended; new facility(ies) opens K:\MEMO\JAG agenda brief 4-29-04 revise.DOC Page 6 E-l INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR JAIL ADMINISTRATION OR~f1 ú (2--t/ óf EST ABLISHING THE TERM, PURPOSE, MEMBERSHIP, GOVERNANCE, JAIL OVERSIGHT ASSEMBLY (ASSEMBLY), JAIL ADMINISTRATION GROUP (JAG), JAIL OPERATION GROUP (JOG), MEETINGS, FISCAL AGENT, STAFFING, ANNUAL ASSESSMENT, TERMINATION, DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY, INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS This Interlocal Agreement ("Agreement") is dated effective November 1,2003 and is made and entered into between Algona, Auburn, Town of Beaux Arts Village, Bellevue, Black Diamond, Bothell, Burien, Carnation, Clyde Hill, Covington, Des Moines, Duvall, Enumclaw, Federal Way, Hunts Point, Issaquah, Kenmore, Kent, Kirkland, Lake Forest Park, Maple Valley, Medina, Mercer Island, Milton, Newcastle, Normandy Park, North Bend, Pacific, Redmond, Renton, Sammamish, SeaTac, Seattle, Shoreline, Skykomish, Snoqualmie, Tukwila, Woodinville and the Town of Yarrow Point, Washington, municipal corporations organized under the laws of the State of Washington (collectively the "Cities"). A. The Cities enter into this Agreement pursuant to and as authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act (Chapter 39.34 RCW). B. Some of the Cities have entered into a long term Interlocal Agreement with Yakima County, as amended, for the purpose of housing the Cities' inmates in Yakima County jail facilities ("Yakima Jail Contract"). The Yakima Jail Contract commits the Cities to deliver a certain number of inmates to Yakima County to satisfy a Minimum Bed Commitment. The Yakima Jail Contract and any addendums to it are incorporated herein by this reference. Previously, the Cities negotiated the terms of an agreement regarding the use by the Cities of the Minimum Bed Commitment, including the allocation of jail beds among the Cities and the allocation of charges for jail service under the Yakima Jail Contract; however, that agreement never took effect. Some of the Cities have entered into a Jail Services Agreement with King County ("King County Jail Contract") providing for the Cities' use of jail beds in King County jail facilities for a limited time not to exceed ten years. The King County J ail Contract is incorporated herein by this reference. c. D. The King County Jail Contract provides for the creation of a Jail Administration Group to respond to any issue regarding the administration, implementation or interpretation of the King County Jail Contract. King County and the City of Bellevue have entered into a Land Transfer Agreement pursuant to Paragraph 12 of the King County Jail Contract which provides for the transfer of ownership of the eastside Jail site ("Jail Property") to Bellevue on behalf of all of the Cities. The Land Transfer Agreement is incorporated herein by this reference. Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 1 of 23 E. F. -1- Ë-<3 G. The Cities desire to enter into this Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration in order to set forth the purpose, membership, governance, meeting frequency, fiscal agent, staffing, term, annual assessment, termination, and insurance and indemnification requirements, and regarding the use by the Cities of the Minimum Bed Commitment under the Yakima Jail Contract, including the method for allocating those jail beds as between the Cites, and to establish the formula for payment for unused beds should the Cities collectively fail to meet their Minimum Bed Commitment with Yakima County, as more specifically set forth in this Agreement. The Cities of Kent and Enumclaw are not parties to the Yakima Jail Contract or the King County Jail Contract. Kent and Enumc1aw are included as parties to this Interlocal Agreement to clarify the City of Bellevue' s authority with respect to the Jail Property, and to provide for Kent's and Enumc1aw's participation in the planning process for disposition of Jail Property proceeds and for future jail facilities. H. 1. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: PURPOSE This lnterlocal Agreement is entered into by the Cities to further clarify the role of the Cities and their representatives in planning, implementation, operation and administration of interlocal agreements related to the provision of current jail services, and in planning for future facilities and programs for municipal inmates, and to establish a formula for the payment of unused beds should the Cities collectively fail to meet their Minimum Bed Commitment with Yakima County. This Agreement implements the administration group created by the King County Jail Contract and creates a group in order to facilitate cooperation in the examination of policy issues, questions and/or disputes involving the administration of the King County Jail Contract and the Yakima Jail Contract, the disposition of the Jail Property proceeds, and the planning for new misdemeanant secure jail facilities, non-secure alternative facilities or programs to create additional misdemeanant capacity. 2. CREATION OF THE ASSEMBLY, JAG AND JOG To accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the Cities hereby create an oversight group of elected representatives called the Jail Oversight Assembly ("Assembly"), an administrative entity called the Jail Administration Group ("JAG"), and an operations entity called the Jail Operations Group ("JOG"), all as further described in Section 6 of this Agreement. 3. DEFINITIONS Assembly means the Jail Oversight Assembly created pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement with the duties described herein. Average Daily Population ("ADP") means that number of City Inmates confined in Yakima County jail facilities for a year, divided by 365. Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 2 of23 E -~ Cities means Algona, Auburn, Town of Beaux Arts Village, Bellevue, Black Diamond, Bothell, Burien, Carnation, Clyde Hill, Covington, Des Moines, Duvall, Enumclaw, Federal Way, Hunts Point, Issaquah, Kenmore, Kent, Kirkland, Lake Forest Park, Maple Valley, Medina, Mercer Island, Milton, Newcastle, Normandy Park, North Bend, Pacific, Redmond, Renton, Sammamish, SeaTac, Seattle, Shoreline, Skykomish, Snoqualmie, Tukwila, Woodinville, and Town of Yarrow Point, Washington. City means a Washington city or town that is a party to this Agreement. City Member means any city or town that has signed this Agreement. Estimated Average Daily Population ("EADP") means that number of City Inmates that each City estimates it will confine in Yakima County jail facilities in a year, divided by 365. Fiscal Agent means the "fiscal agent" selected by the Assembly pursuant to RCW 39.34.030. JAG means the Jail Administration Group created pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement, and the King County Jail Contract. JOG means the Jail Operation Group created pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement and with the duties described herein. Jail Property means that certain real property located in Bellevue, Washington and commonly known as 1440 116th Avenue NE and 1412 116th Avenue NE, Bellevue, Washington, to be conveyed to the City of Bellevue to hold on behalf of all King County cities as third party beneficiaries consistent with the King County Jail Contract. Minimum Bed Commitment means the bed commitment made by the Cities collectively to maintain an Average Daily Population in Yakima County jail facilities equal to 440 City Inmates from October 1, 2003 through December 31, 2009, or as otherwise set in the Yakima Jail Contract. Overused Bed Commitment means the difference between a City's EADP and the actual number of City Inmates sent to Yakima County jail facilities by that City, where the actual number is less than that City's EADP. 4. TERM This Agreement shall be dated effective November 1, 2003 and shall continue until December 31, 2012, the date of the expiration of the King County Jail Contract ("Term"). This Agreement may be renewed for any successive periods, by written addendum, under terms and conditions acceptable to all of the Cities. No City that is a party to this Agreement at its inception or thereafter will be required to be a party to any renewal of this Agreement. 5. TERMINATION 5.1 Termination Unrelated to Yakima Jail Contract. Any City may terminate its participation in this Agreement by delivering written notice to the Assembly, by Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 3 of23 E -fa December 31 in any year, of its intention to terminate effective December 31 of the following year. Any City terminating this Agreement shall remain legally and financially responsible for any obligation incurred by the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, including its obligation to pay its annual assessment for the current budget year as described in Sections 8 and 9 of this Agreement. 5.2 Termination for Cause - Yakima Jail Contract. In the event any City's participation in the Yakima Jail Contract is terminated for cause, as defined in the Yakima Jail Contract, such City shall remain legally and financially responsible to Yakima County for its EADP until December 31, 2009, or the end of the then existing term if the Yakima Jail Contract has been extended before the termination for cause; provided, that the terminated City may be entitled to a credit under Section 10 of this Agreement. 6. 6.1 GOVERNANCE Jail Oversight Assembly (Assembly). (a) Membership. Each City Member shall appoint one elected official to be a member of the Assembly. The initial Assembly member for each City shall be the elected official designated by the City in the space provided below the City's signature on this Agreement. In the event that a City's initial Assembly member becomes unable to serve as an Assembly member, the City shall designate a new or alternate Assembly member. (b) Assembly Powers. The Assembly shall make policy determinations necessary to guide and direct the administration of this Agreement, and to guide JAG and JOG in the performance of duties under this Agreement, the King County Jail Contract, the Land Transfer Agreement, and the Yakima Jail Contract. The Assembly shall have the following duties and powers: (i) Annual Assessment, Budget and Work Program. The Assembly shall receive recommendations from JAG regarding the annual budget pursuant to Section 8 of this Agreement, the amount of the annual assessment pursuant to Section 9 of this Agreement, and an annual work program. On or before July 151 of each year, the Assembly shall submit to the legislative body of each City a recommendation for the annual assessments, the annual budget, and the work program for the next year. (ii) Disposition of Jail Property. The Assembly shall receive recommendations from JAG and/or JOG regarding use of any proceeds of the sale or transfer of the Jail Property, and then either approve, reject or approve with modification such use of the proceeds. (iii) New Misdemeanant Facilities. The Assembly shall receive recommendations from JAG and/or JOG regarding alternatives for assessment and planning for new misdemeanant secure jail facilities, proposals to site or create jail facilities, options for non-secure alternative facilities or programs and issuance of long term debt for construction of such facilities and then either approve, reject, or modify the recommended alternative. Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 4 of23 1; - \ \ (iv) Amendments. The Assembly shall receive recommendations from JAG and/or JOG regarding any amendments to this Agreement, including the amendment of the annual assessment fonnula set forth in Section 9 of this Agreement, or the other interlocal agreements referenced by this Agreement and incorporated herein, and then make a recommendation to approve, reject or modify such amendment to the legislative bodies of each City or return the recommendation to the JAG or JOG. (v) Fiscal Agent. The Assembly shall appoint a Fiscal Agent for the purposes of carrying out and recording financial transactions pursuant to RCW 39.34.030. (vi) Policy Detenninations. The Assembly may make such policy detenninations as are necessary to guide the administration or implementation of this Agreement, the King County Jail Contract, the Yakima Jail Contract, and the Land Transfer Agreement, including but not limited to policy regarding the hiring of employees or contracting with consultants, purchasing of goods or services, and adoption of procedures for the administration of this Agreement. (c) Meetings. The Assembly shall meet at the times convened by its officers, but at least once each year. For any meeting held in addition to one annual meeting regarding the annual budget, assessments, and work program, the Assembly may meet by telephone, electronically, video conferencing, or any other communications mechanism that allows simultaneous communication between all persons in attendance; provided, that at least fourteen days notice of the meeting is provided to all Assembly members. A quorum shall consist of Assembly members representing sixty percent (60%) of the total residential population of all City Members. Decisions shall be made or action shall be taken by the affinnative vote of Assembly members from Cities having sixty percent (60%) of the total residential population of all City Members. For purposes of this section, each Cities' residential population shall be deemed to be the most recent population estimate available from the State of Washington's Office of Financial Management. If an Assembly member will be absent from a meeting, the Assembly member may, but is not required to, designate by written proxy another person to attend the meeting and vote on behalf of the Assembly member. The Assembly may seek a straw vote for infonnational purposes only. (d) Assembly Officers. The Assembly members shall select up to four officers, including a chairperson and vice-chairperson to serve as the executive committee; provided, that ifrepresentatives are not selected from each ofthe three largest jail users among the cities that are parties to both the Yakima and King County jail interlocal agreements for housing misdemeanant inmates, such representatives shall be included as additional members of the executive committee. "Largest jail user" is detennined by the sum of the jail inmate populations in the King County and Yakima jail facilities from the prior calendar year. The officers serving as the executive committee shall (1) convene meetings of the Assembly as the officers detennine appropriate, but at least once a year, (2) establish the agenda for each meeting, (3) act as spokespersons for the Assembly, and (4) convene and make assignments to Assembly subcommittees, as Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 5 of23 E: - \L.- 6.2 appropriate. The chairperson shall preside over the Assembly's meetings, and the vice-chairperson shall preside in the chairperson's absence. Jail Administration Group (JAG). (a) Membership. The JAG shall be composed of six (6) members as follows: City of Seattle Representative (1) City of Bellevue Representative (1) Suburban Cities Representatives (4) The Mayor of Seattle shall appoint the City of Seattle representative, and shall also appoint an alternative Seattle representative to serve in the event that the original representative is absent or becomes unable to serve. The Bellevue City Manager shall appoint the City of Bellevue representative, and shall also appoint an alternative Bellevue representative to serve in the event that the original representative is absent or becomes unable to serve. The Suburban Cities Association ("SCA") shall select three (3) representative cities through a process defined by the SCA, and a fourth representative among the SCA cities shall be selected by the Mayor or City Manager of the SCA city that is the largest jail user and a party to both the King County and Yakima interlocal agreements for housing misdemeanant inmates. "Largest jail user" is determined by the sum of the j ail inmate populations in the King County and Yakima j ail facilities from the prior calendar year. For each city representative selected by SCA, and the suburban city selected based upon largest jail population, the Mayor of a mayor/council city or the City Manager of a manager/council city shall appoint that City's representative, as well as an alternative representative to serve in the event that the original representative is absent or becomes unable to serve. The Seattle, Bellevue, and Suburban Cities members of the JAG created in this Section shall be the same as the members of the JAG created under the King County Jail Contract. (b) JAG Powers. The JAG shall administer this Agreement pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the Yakima Jail Contract, the King County Jail Contract, and the Land Transfer Agreement and pursuant to any procedures adopted by the Assembly or JAG. The JAG shall have the following duties and powers: (i) Act as the Cities' representatives to the King County Jail Contract and perform all duties assigned to JAG under that Contract, consistent with policy direction provided by the Assembly under this Agreement; Make policy recommendations as defined in Section 6.1 of this Agreement to the Assembly including, without limitation, recommendations on the disposition of the Jail Property proceeds (subject to Section 7 of this Agreement), alternatives for assessment and planning for new misdemeanant secure jail facilities, proposals to site or create jail facilities, options for non- secure alternative facilities or programs and issuance of long term debt for construction of such facilities, and contract language (ii) Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 6 of23 £ -- \S (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) associated with any re-opener of the provIsIons described in Section 7 of the King County J ail Contract; Make recommendations to the Assembly on the appointment of a Fiscal Agent for the purposes of carrying out and recording financial transactions pursuant to RCW 39.34.030; Evaluate JOG recommendations regarding the interpretation of the King County Jail Contract or Yakima Jail Contract and issues related to inmate transportation, alternative and community correction programs, coordination with the courts and law enforcement, mental health, drug and alcohol treatment, alternative facilities within or outside of King County or other related issues; After consultation with JOG, develop and recommend a budget, including annual assessments, and work program to the Assembly, and implement the budget and work program, subject to the Cities' obtaining legislative body approval of each City's individual annual assessment, the annual budget, and the work program in accordance with Section 8 of this Agreement; Following budget and work program approval by the Assembly and City Members in accordance with Section 8 of this Agreement, and subject to the availability of funds, the JAG, acting through its chairperson, will have the following additional powers: (1) Hire and supervise any staff, consultants or private vendors consistent with the annual budget, work program, and any human resource policies and procedures of the Fiscal Agent; Negotiate and enter into any contracts or agreements with third parties for goods and services consistent with the annual budget and work program; Approve or disapprove expenditures consistent with the annual budget and work program; (2) (3) Make purchases or contract for services consistent with the annual budget and work program; and If an annual budget becomes effective under Section 8.1, but insufficient Cities approve and pay assessments to fund the entire work program for that budget year, then JAG has the authority to assign priorities to various items in the work program and to determine which items or portions of items will be removed from the work program for that budget year. Adopt procedures for the conduct of JAG's meetings; (4) (5) Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 7 of23 ~... \L1 (viii) Uniformly inform and consult with the Assembly and JOG for contract disputes, operational policy issues, hiring and supervision of staff, creation of the work program, creation of the budget, revisions to the cost allocation formula to establish the annual assessment set forth in Section 9 of this Agreement, disposition of the Jail Property proceeds and any decisions regarding assessment and planning for new misdemeanant secure facilities, misdemeanant non-secure alternative facilities or programs; Mediate disputes or issues presented to JAG by a City or Cities regarding the interpretation of or otherwise arising out of this Agreement, the Yakima Jail Contract, or the King County Jail Contract. In the event that any City or Cities present a dispute to JAG and JAG is unable to resolve the dispute in a manner acceptable to the Cities involved, the Cities shall submit the dispute to mediation prior to initiating any action in a court; and (ix) 6.3 Conduct any and all other business allowed by applicable law and necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. (c) Meetings. The JAG shall meet as often as it deems necessary, but not less than quarterly. A quorum shall consist of a simple majority of the JAG's members or alternates. Decisions will be made by consensus of all the JAG members in attendance at a meeting. The JAG may seek a straw vote for informational purposes only. (d) Chairperson. The JAG members shall select a chairperson and Vlce- chairperson from among the JAG members to preside over JAG's meetings. Jail Operation Group (JOG). (a) Membership. Each City Member shall appoint one representative to be a member of the JOG. The initial JOG member for each City shall be designated by the City in the space provided below the City's signature on this Agreement. (b) JOG Powers. The JOG shall advise the Assembly and JAG on operational issues regarding the King County Jail Contract or the Yakima Jail Contract, including without limitation, issues or disputes among the City Members related to contract interpretation, contract disputes, inmate transportation, alternative and community correction programs, coordination with the courts and law enforcement, mental health, drug and alcohol treatment, alternative facilities within or outside of King County, and any other related issues. The JOG shall consult with JAG regarding recommendations for the annual budget, assessments, and work program. (c) Meetings. The JOG shall meet as often as it deems necessary, but not less than quarterly. A quorum at any meeting of the JOG shall consist of a simple majority of the JOG members. Decisions will be made by consensus of all the JOG members in attendance at a meeting. The JOG may seek a straw vote for informational purposes only. (x) Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 8 of23 E -15 (d) Chairperson. The JOG members shall select a chairperson and vice- chairperson from among the JOG members to preside over JOG's meetings. 7. JAIL PROPERTY 7.1 Land Transfer. Pursuant to the terms of the King County Jail Contract and the Land Transfer Agreement, King County will convey the Jail Property to the City of Bellevue prior to July 1, 2004. Bellevue will hold the Jail Property on behalf of all cities in King County as third party beneficiaries. Bellevue shall act as the fiscal agent of the cities for purposes of taking action with respect to the Jail Property. Any disposition of the Jail Property shall also be consistent with the terms and provisions of Section 12 of the King County Jail Contract, which provides in pertinent part as follows: "The Property will be used to contribute to the cost of building secure capacity, or contracting for secure capacity, and, at the sole discretion of the Contract Cities, building or contracting for alternative corrections facilities, sufficient to enable the Contract Cities to meet the final step (occurring on December 31, 2012) of the population reduction schedule as detailed in Sections 11.3 and 11.4 of this Agreement. The parties understand that the Property may be sold or traded and the proceeds and/or land acquired from such sale or trade used for the purposes detailed in the preceding sentence. The parties further agree that in the event the cities do not build secure capacity, or contract for secure capacity, and, at the sole discretion of the Contract Cities build or contract for alternative corrections facilities, sufficient to enable the Contract Cities to meet the final step (occurring on December 31, 2012) of the population reduction schedule as detailed in Sections 11.3 and 11.4 of this Agreement the City of Bellevue shall transfer title to the Property back to the County if such Property has not been sold; or if such Property has been sold, pay the County an amount equal to the net sale price of the Property, plus investment interest earned; or if the Property has been traded, pay the County the appraised value of the Property at the time of the trade, as determined by an MIA appraiser selected by mutual agreement of King County and the City of Bellevue, plus investment interest earned." 7.2 Expenses. The City of Bellevue is authorized to sell the Jail Property for no less than fair market value. Fair market value shall be determined by an MIA appraisal commissioned by the City. The City of Bellevue is authorized to deduct from the gross proceeds customary expenses necessary to dispose of the property and costs incurred to perform due diligence studies necessary to exercise the option to take possession of the property from the County including, but not limited to, tests inspections, survey, appraisal, expenses resulting from any legal challenge, maintenance activities during the time the City of Bellevue has possession of the property. The total deductions shall not exceed five percent (5%) unless approved by the Assembly. If the Jail Property is sold and Cities fail to meet the terms set out in Section 12 of the King County Jail Contract referenced in Section 7.1 above regarding use of the proceeds, Cities are responsible for their proportional share of the amount required to reimburse Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 9 of23 Ë -I~ King County as referenced in that section. This responsibility will be met collectively by requiring the fiscal agent to invest the sale proceeds in investment instruments that will preserve the full value of the capital assets, assure liquidity for funding future misdemeanant jail facilities and achieve the best rate of investment return. Until these conditions can be met, the fiscal agent shall retain the sale proceeds in the State Local Government Investment Pool. 8. FINANCE AND BUDGET 8.1 Budget. The budget year for jail administration and operations shall be January 1 to December 31 of any year. On or before July 1 sl of each year, a recommended budget, assessments, and work program for the next budget year shall be prepared by JAG, reviewed and recommended by the Assembly, and transmitted to each City's legislative body for approval or disapproval. Approval of the budget by a City's legislative body shall obligate that City to pay the assessment budgeted for that City for the next budget year; if a City's legislative body disapproves the budget that City shall not be obligated to pay the assessment budgeted for that City for the next budget year. An annual budget, including assessments, and work program shall not become effective unless the annual budget is approved by the legislative bodies of Cities representing sixty percent (60%) of the total residential population of all City Members. If an annual budget becomes effective under this Section, but insufficient Cities approve and pay assessments to fund the entire work program for that budget year, then JAG has the authority to assign priorities to the various items in the work program and to determine which items or portions of items will be removed from the work program for that budget year. For budget year 2004, the Cities shall make a good faith effort to accomplish the budget, assessment, and work program approval process by December 31, 2003. In the event that the Cities are unable to complete the process by that date, the Cities agree that the assessments for the year 2004 shall be as stated in Exhibit A to this Agreement, and the budget and work program approval for the year 2004 shall be completed by March 31, 2004 and shall be consistent with the assessments stated in Exhibit A. 8.2 Authority. The JAG, acting through its chairperson, and consistent with the budget, assessments, and work program approved by the City Members, is authorized to (1) apply for loans or grants in order to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement consistent with Chapter 39.34 RCW, (2) seek and negotiate partnerships with public and private corporations or entities as allowed by law, and (3) approve expenditures and direct the Fiscal Agent to make payments. The Fiscal Agent is empowered to receive all annual assessments received from the Cities and to make disbursements as approved by the JAG chairperson. If grants or other unbudgeted funds become available, budget amendments will be referred to the Assembly for its review and recommendations to City Members. 8.3 Fiscal Agent. The City of Tukwila shall act as the Assembly's initial Fiscal Agent pursuant to RCW 39.34.030 until the Assembly approves another Fiscal Agent. 8.4 Intergovernmental Cooperation. The Assembly and JAG will cooperate with state, county, and other local agencies to maximize use of any grant funds or other Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 10 of23 E -Il resources and enhance the effectiveness of the programs and projects created or implemented pursuant to this Agreement. 9. ANNUAL ASSESSMENT Funding for the activities under this Agreement shall be provided solely through the budget process described in Section 8 and collection of the annual assessment described in this Section 9. No separate dues or assessments shall be imposed or required of the Cities except upon unanimous vote of all of the Cities. The annual assessment shall be paid to the Fiscal Agent on a quarterly basis at the beginning of each quarter. Each City shall be assessed an annual assessment fee equal to Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars and Noll 00 ($250.00) or equal to its proportional share of the approved budget based upon the following cost allocation formula, whichever is greater: (i) 50% of the annual fee shall be based upon the percentage calculated by dividing each City's residential population into the total residential population of all City Members, multiplied by one-half of the total amount of the annual budget; and 50% of the annual fee shall be based upon the percentage calculated by dividing a City's EADP into the actual total annual jail bed usage by the Cities in the Yakima jail facilities, multiplied by one-half of the total amount of the annual budget. (ii) The cost allocation formula is expressed as follows: (City'S res. population) (Total of all Cities' res. population) multiplied by (Yz of total annual budget) plus (City's EADP) (Total Annual Jail Bed Usage of all Cities) multiplied by (Yz of total annual budget) in Yakima County jail facilities) equals City's Total Annual Assessment 10. DEFICITS IN USAGE OF YAKIMA JAIL BEDS Each City has generated an EADP. Attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated by this reference, is the EADP of each City. In the event the Cities collectively fail to meet their Minimum Bed Commitment for any year during the term of the Yakima Jail Contract, the EADPs set forth in Exhibit B shall be used by the Cities to calculate the proportionate share owed by any individual City to Yakima. Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 11 of23 E "'lß Each City will be responsible for its bed commitment to Yakima. Only those Cities that did not meet their EADPs and have unused bed commitment for the year will be responsible for paying Yakima for such unused bed commitment. However, if some cities exceed their EADP, their overage will be distributed as a credit to the cities whose jail use was less than their EADPs. Each City's credit will be based upon its percentage share of the total EADP. A City whose actual jail use equals or exceeds its EADP will pay Yakima an amount equal to its actual jail use. A City whose actual jail use is less than its EADP will pay Yakima an amount based on its EADP less the credit as described in this section. For purposes of this section, "credit" shall mean the product resulting from multiplying the (Beds in excess of Cities' EADP) by the quotient obtained by dividing the (EADP of a City with Unused Bed Commitment) by the (Sum of EADPs of all Cities with Unused Bed Commitment.) The calculation of a City's credit is expressed in the formula below: City Credit = (Sum of amount over the EADP X of All Cities Which Exceed Their EADPs) (EADP of a City wlUnused Bed Commitment) (Sum ofEADPs of Cities w/Unused Beds) For a City whose actual jail use was less than its EADP, its "credit" will be subtracted from the number of unused city beds. The difference is the amount that shall be paid to Yakima as expressed in the formulas below: City's unused beds = City's EADP - City's actual bed use Amount owed to Yakima = City's unused beds - city credit Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, provides an example of a hypothetical application of this formula. 11. SURPLUS USAGE OF YAKIMA JAIL BEDS The Cities acknowledge that the Yakima Jail Contract does not require each City to maintain ajail usage equal to that City's EADP. Overused Bed Commitment by one City may inure to the benefit of the other Cities. However, Overused Bed Commitment in excess of five percent (5%) may create a hardship for the other Cities. Therefore, prior to usage in excess of five percent (5%) of its EADP, a City must obtain consent from another City or Cities to use a portion of the other City's or Cities' EADP. 12. NEW MEMBERS Any city or town may become a member to this Agreement so long as such city or town has entered into contracts for jail services with King County or Yakima County, executes an Addendum to this Agreement agreeing to comply with the terms and provisions of this Agreement, as now existing or hereafter amended, and obtains approval of the current budget by its legislative body. The Assembly shall determine what, if any, funding obligations such additional member city shall pay as a condition of becoming a member city to this Agreement. Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 12 of23 ~ -'l') 13. MAILING ADDRESSES All notices and correspondence to the respective parties to this Agreement shall be sent to the City Manager or Mayor for each City. All notices and correspondence to the Assembly shall be sent to the office of the Fiscal Agent. 14. INSURANCE 14.1 Evidence of Insurance Coverage. Each City agrees to provide the other Cities with evidence of insurance coverage, in the form of a certificate of insurance from a solvent insurance provider and/or a letter confirming coverage from a solvent insurance pool or self-insurance program which is sufficient to address the insurance and indemnification obligations set forth in this Agreement. 14.2 Minimum Liability Limits. Each City shall obtain and maintain throughout the term of this Agreement coverage in minimum liability limits of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate for its liability exposures, including comprehensive general liability, errors and omissions, auto liability and police professional liability. The insurance policy shall provide coverage on an occurrence basis; except that insurance on a "claims made" basis may be acceptable with prior approval from JAG. If coverage is approved and purchased on a "claims made" basis, the City Member providing such insurance warrants continuation of coverage through policy renewals or the purchase of a tail, and/or conversion from a "claims made" form to an "occurrence" coverage form. 15. HOLD HARMLESS/INDEMNIFICATION Each City shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless all other Cities, their officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, including third party claims, costs, judgments or damages, including attorney's fees, arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of the City, its officers, agents and employees, in connection with this Agreement. The Cities hereby waive, as to each other only, their immunity from suit under industrial insurance, Title 51 RCW. This waiver of immunity was mutually negotiated by the Cities. The provisions of this Section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. 16. GENERAL PROVISIO~S 16.1 This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the Cities with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement. No provision of this Agreement may be amended or modified except by written agreement authorized by the legislative bodies of all of the Cities and signed by all of the Cities. Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 13 of23 e -1-U 16.2 Any provision that is declared invalid or illegal shall in no way affect or invalidate any other provision. 16.3 In the event any City defaults on the perfonnance of any terns of this Agreement or any City places the enforcement of this Agreement in the hands of an attorney, or files a lawsuit, the prevailing City or Cities shall be entitled to an award of all its/their attorney fees, costs, and expenses. 16.4 Failure of any City to declare any breach or default immediately upon the occurrence thereof, or delay in taking any action in connection therewith, shall not constitute a waiver of such breach or default. 16.5 Any action, suit, or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement shall be brought and tried in the Superior Court or the State of Washington in King County. Presenting disputes to the JAG and to a mediator consistent with this Interlocal Agreement shall be conditions precedent to the commencement of any judicial process to enforce the terms of this Agreement. 16.6 This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts. 16.7 The laws of the State of Washington shall govern this Agreement. 16.8 This Agreement shall be recorded with the King County Department of Records. THIS AGREEMENT has been executed by the undersigned Cities and shall be dated effective November 1,2003. CITY OF ALGONA, W A Approved as to Form: By: Glenn Wilson, Mayor George Kelley, Algona City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF AUBURN, W A Approved as to Form: By: Peter B. Lewis, Mayor Daniel B. Heid, Auburn City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: TOWN OF BEAUX ARTS VILLAGE, W A Approved as to Form: By: Charles R. Lowry, Mayor Wayne Stewart, Town Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 14 of 23 ~-~\ CITY OF BELLEVUE, VI A Approved as to Form: By: Steve Sarkozy, City Manager Richard L. Andrews, Bellevue City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF BLACK DIAMOND, W A Approved as to Form: By: Howard Botts, Mayor Loren D. Combs, City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF BOTHELL, W A Approved as to Form: By: Jim Thompson, City Manager Michael E. Weight, Bothell City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF BURIEN, W A Approved as to Form: By: Gary P. Long, City Manager Lisa Marshall, Burien City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF CARNATION, W A Approved as to Form: By: Woody Edvalson, City Manager Phil A. Olbrechts, Carnation City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF CLYDE HILL, W A Approved as to Form: By: George S. Martin, Mayor Clyde Hill City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 15 of 23 G -2,-~ CITY OF COVINGTON, W A Approved as to Form: By: Andrew D. Dempsey, City Manager Duncan C. Wilson, Covington City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF DES MOINES, W A Approved as to Form: By Tony Piasecki, City Manager Des Moines City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF DUV ALL, W A Approved as to Form: By: Becky Nixon, Mayor Bruce Disend, Duvall City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF ENUMCLAW, WA Approved as to Form: By: John Wise, Mayor Michael 1. Reynolds, Enumclaw City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, W A Approved as to Form: By: By: David H. Moseley, City Manager Patricia A. Richardson Federal Way City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF HUNTS POINT Approved as to Form: By: By: Fred McConkey, Mayor Hunts Point City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 16 of23 ~-Z3 CITY OF ISSAQUAH, W A Approved as to Form: By: By: Ava Frisinger, Mayor Wayne D. Tanaka Issaquah City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF KENMORE, W A Approved as to Form: By: Stephen L. Anderson, City Manager Michael R. Kenyon, Kenmore City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF KENT, W A Approved as to Form: By: Jim White, Mayor Tom, Brubaker, Kent City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF KIRKLAND, W A Approved as to Form: By: David H. Ramsay, City Manager Gail Gorud, Kirkland City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF LAKE FOREST PARK, W A Approved as to Form: By: David R. Hutchinson, Mayor Michael P. Ruark, Lake Forest Park City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF MAPLE VALLEY, W A Approved as to Form: By: John F. Starbard, City Manager Lisa Marshall, Maple Valley City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 17 of 23 E - 2>\ CITY OF MEDINA, W A Approved as to Form: By: Douglas J. Schulze, City Manager Kirk R. Wines, Medina City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, W A Approved as to Form: By: Richard M. Conrad, City Manager Londi K. Lindell, Mercer Island City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF MILTON Approved as to Form: By: By: Katrina Asay, Mayor Milton City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF NEWCASTLE, W A Approved as to Form: By: Andrew J. Takata, City Manager Dawn Findlay, Newcastle City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF NORMANDY PARK, W A Approved as to Form: By: Merlin MacReynold, City Manager Susan Rae Sampson, Normandy Park City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF NORTH BEND, W A Approved as to Form: By: Joan Simpson, Mayor Michael R. Kenyon, North Bend City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 18 of23 E - 2-5 CITY OF PACIFIC, W A Approved as to Form: By: Howard Erickson, Mayor Bruce Disend, Pacific City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF REDMOND, W A Approved as to Form: By: Rosemarie Ives, Mayor James E. Haney, Redmond City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF RENTON, W A Approved as to Form: By: Jesse Tanner, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren, Renton City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF SAMMAMISH, W A Approved as to Form: By Ben Yazici, City Manager Bruce Disend, Sammamish City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF SEAT AC, W A Approved as to Form: By: Bruce A. Rayburn, City Manager Robert L. McAdams, SeaTac City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF SEATTLE, W A Approved as to Form: By: Gregory J. Nickels, Mayor Thomas A. Carr, Seattle City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 19 of23 r;; - Ltp CITY OF SHORELINE, W A Approved as to Fonn: By: Steven C. Burkett, City Manager Ian Sievers, Shoreline City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF SKYKOMISH, W A Approved as to Fonn: By: Skip Mackner, Mayor Jeffrey Ganson, Skykomish City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF SNOQUALMIE, W A Approved as to Fonn: By: Randy Fuzzy Fletcher, Mayor Pat Anderson, Snoqualmie City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF TUKWILA, W A Approved as to Fonn: By: Steve Mullet, Mayor Robert F. Noe, City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: CITY OF WOODINVILLE, W A Approved as to Fonn: By: Pete Rose, City Manager Jeffrey L. Taraday, Woodinville City Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: TOWN OF YARROW POINT, W A Approved as to Fonn: By: Jeanne R. Berry, Mayor Wayne Stewart, Yarrow Point Town Attorney Initial Assembly Member: Initial JOG Member: Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 20 of 23 G-2l EXHIBIT A 2004 ANNUAL COST PER CITY FOR THE JAIL ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (JAG) Yakima Estimated 2002 Average of city pop. & jail Bed Population beds; $250 minimum Commitment Total 440.1 1,327,706 $88,000 Auburn 88.5 43,970 11.9% $10,056 Bellevue 27.0 117,000 7.6% $6,462 Bothell 2.0 16,264 0.9% $728 Burien 4.0 31,810 1.7% $1,432 Covington 2.4 14,395 0.8% $705 Des Moines 17.0 29,510 3.1% $2,622 Federal Way 29.0 83,850 6.6% $5,571 Issaquah 2.0 13,790 0.8% $647 Kenmore 3.0 19,180 1.1% $921 Kirkland 12.5 45,790 3.2% $2,717 Lake Forest Park 2.5 12,860 0.8% $665 Maple Valley 15,040 0.6% $493 Mercer Island 4.0 21,955 1.3% $1,109 Newcastle 8,205 0.3% $269 North Bend 2.0 4,735 0.4% $350 Redmond 20.0 46,040 4.1% $3,456 Renton 27.0 53,840 5.2% $4,393 Sammamish 1.5 34,660 1.5% $1,282 SeaTac 4.1 25,320 1.5% $1,229 Seattle 155.0 570,802 40.0% $33,793 Shoreline 18.0 53,250 4.1% $3,497 Tukwila 11.0 17,270 1.9% $1,637 Woodinville 1.5 9,830 0.6% $468 Algona 3.0 2,525 0.4% $250 Beaux Arts Village 295 $250 Black Diamond 4,015 $250 Carnation 0.0 1,905 $250 Clyde Hill 0.0 2,895 $250 Duvall 1.0 5,190 $250 Hunt's Point 455 $250 Medina 0.7 3,010 $250 Milton 815 $250 Normandy Park 0.4 6,395 $250 Pacific 5,405 $250 Skykomish 215 $250 Snoqualmie 1.0 4,210 $250 Yarrow Point 1,010 $250 Estimated Annual Cost (salary/benefits) for JAG staff position::;: $88,000 Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 21 of23 ;: -2<1> EXHIBIT B TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES CONTRACTING WITH YAKIMA City or Town 2003 EADP Algona 3.0 Auburn 88.5 Beaux Arts Village 0.0 Bellevue Black Diamond Bothell 27.0 0.0 2.0 Burien Carnation Clyde Hill Covington Des Moines Duvall 4.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 17.0 1.0 Federal Way Issaquah Kenmore 29.0 2.0 3.0 12.5 2.5 0.0 Kirkland Lake Forest Park Maple Valley Medina Mercer Island Newcastle 0.7 4.0 0.0 Normandy Park North Bend Pacific 0.4 2.0 0.0 Redmond Renton Sammamish 20.0 27.0 1.5 SeaTac Seattle Shoreline 4.1 155.0 18.0 Skykomish Snoqualmie Tukwila 0.0 1.0 11.0 1.5 0.0 Woodinville Yarrow Point TOTAL 440.1 Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 22 of23 E-~, EXHIBIT C TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR JAIL ADMINISTRATION Hypothetical Example - formulas for distributing unused bed capacity at Yakima Scenario: 3 cities contract with Yakima for a minimum of 130 beds. The cities are under their collective commitment by 20 beds; 2 cities are under and 1 city is over its bed commitment. Total Bed Commitment Actual Unused Contract Cities (EADP) Bed Use Beds City A 80 70 (10) City B 40 25 (15) CityC 10 15 5 Total 130 110 (20) Amount Owed to Yakima Under Formula Stated in Section 10 of this Agreement Each city pays for its unused beds but then receives a credit based on its % share of the total bed commitment. For example, City C exceeded its bed commitment by 5 beds. City A's share of this 5 bed overage (aka the "credit") is calculated by taking City A's % share of the total bed commitment (67%) times the overage of 5 beds = a credit of 3.3 beds. City C owes Yakima for 76.7 beds (EADP of 80 beds less the credit of 3.3 beds). Cities with Unused Bed Total Bed Commitment % Share Actual Unused Commitment (EADP) (EADP) Bed Use Beds City A 80 67% 70 + 10 City B 40 33% 25 + 15 Subtotal 120 100% 95 + 25 CitvC 10 15 + 0 Total 130 110 + 25 Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration Page 23 of 23 ~-3ù Amount Owed to Credit Yakima 3.3 = 76.7 1.7 38.3 5.0 115.0 0 = 15 5 = 130 MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# :rz= (cD CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan CATEGORY: BUDGET IMP ACT: 0 CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE [8J PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0 $0 $0 .................................._......... ............................... ATTACHMENTS: Public comment email (staff reports and background information were included with your packet materials for the June 1,2004 Council Meeting). ...............-.......-................ SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: As a chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan establishes pre-annexation Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations, and general policies regarding land use, transportation, environment, capital facilities, public services, annexation and other issues. A fiscal analysis of annexation feasibility within the P AA was prepared. The P AA Subarea Plan has been reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 3, 2004, March 17, 2004, April 7, 2004 and April 21, 2004 and LUTC on May 3, 2004 and May 24, 2004 and forwarded to City Council for final action. City Council held a public hearing and accepted public comment on June 1, 2004. The second required public hearing and first reading of the adopting ordinance is scheduled for the July 6, 2004 Council meeting. ...............-.................. .................-..-......... .......-.....-..-......... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On May 3, 2004 and May 24,2004 the LUTC reviewed and recommended the Final Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan be approved as proposed with the following recommendations regarding four site specific zoning requests: Apply the Community Business Comprehensive Plan classification and BC zoning with companion Comprehensive Plan text amendment and development agreement (at time of annexation) to the Jackson property (adjacent to northbound 1-5 freeway on-ramps on the north side of S. 320th Street). Apply the Neighborhood Business Comprehensive Plan classification and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning to the Davis site located at 30682 Military Rd. S. Apply the Single Family High Density Comprehensive Plan classification and RS9.6 zoning (9,600 square foot lot sizes) to the North Lake frontage lots on the east side of North Lake. Apply the Neighborhood Business Comprehensive Plan classification and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning to the Rabie site located south 288th St. S. and east ofI-5. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to close the Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan public hearing." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: TVfWC (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED - 05/10/2001 COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # Page 1 of 1 Isaac Conlen - PAA Subarea Plan (Jackson) From: To: Date: Subject: "Lynn Carruthers Strobel" <LCarruthersStrobel@msn.com> < isaac.conlen@cityoffederalway.com> 06/02/2004 10:03 AM PAA Subarea Plan (Jackson) ----.------.-. Mr. Conlen, I was unable to attend the meeting last night do to a last minute work situation that I had to attend to. My home, is at the north end of the area that Mr. Jackson wants to change into a "community business park". We purchased our property over 5 years ago and spent over 2 years building our dream home. We chose this property because of its convince of location but mostly because of its private cui d sac, low traffic, family neighborhood atmosphere where we could raise our son. My property adjoins the proposed area, we are directly next door to the requested change. For Mr. Jackson, I am sure this would mean a great deal of money to be made in accomplishing this zone change. As for our lovely neighborhood and property values we will be loosing not just money but a piece of mind, and since of security that this wonderful sleepy neighborhood brings to all that live here. I can only imagine how you would feel if the emotional and financial investment of you family home was threatened in such a way. When we and others in our neighborhood purchased or built our homes, we did so with the perceived idea that this was a residential area and would stay that way. Not only is the area in question a wet land, it would create more congestion on 320th than we already have. Just down Military, less than 2 miles there is a Safeway, a new Walgreen being built, a dry cleaners, restaurants, fast food, discount stores, and more. And on 320th on 2 of the 4 corners we have 2 wonderful espresso bars. Life is good here. Bring in more homes, and families, parks and happy people. We just finished a long threat and worry to having a sex offender facility brought to our area. When will we just be able to exist peacefully? I surely would appreciate you considering the little people when you all make your decision. The existing zoning or your original staff recommendation helps the entire neighborhood, a decision for Mr. Jackson would increase his wealth, create more traffic congestion onto 320th, be a struggle for the existing small businesses to compete, and force a lot of people to move from a neighborhood that they call home. Is there anything we can do as a community to help stop this from happening? Does an attorney help? Signatures? I would appreciate your comments. And thank you for taking the time to read this. Sincerely, Lynn and Ed Strobel 31323 32nd Ave. South Auburn, WA 98001 253 946-3945 file:/ /C: \Documents%20and %20Settings\default\Local%20Settings\ Temp \GW} 0000 I.H... 06/04/2004 MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# .JLL- ØJ ...............................-...... ..............-.-....................-...-........... ......................-......... .....................................-...........-....-.....-............. ................................................. .......................................... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Disposal of Surplus City Property CATEGORY: D CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS BUDGET IMP ACT: D ORDINANCE ~ PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 .... ...-..-... ......-.-- --............-...--...-.....-..-............. ...-.... ........ ..-...-...-.-.......---- -.-.-........... ............. . ......... ............-.............---..-.....--.-.....-.---..-...........-- -. -..-.......-.. ... .........................-...-................-... ATTACHMENTS: FEDRAC staff report. ... ......... ....... .---.....-.---.--.--.-...-..-....-......-... .--..........-..-...---...-.--.................................... .............. .....-...........-.--..---..-....-..-.......-....--..-...-...- -..-.-.--....-- SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: See attached FEDRAC staff report. .. ............. ....-.........-...-........-...-............--.....-.........-.... -.... -..................... .... .................-......-.....-...- ..-..............-.--......--....... ....... -....... .... ......- --...--....-...-.--....-...-.....--...--..... ..--......... ......-...-.....--.....................-.....-....-...-... -.-... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: 1) Request that the full City Council hold a public hearing on July 6, 2004, to discuss the surplus of cubicles, furniture, and other equipment from the Old City Hall, Police Department, and Municipal Court that are not needed in the New City Hall; 2) recommend that the full City Council approve the attached resolution; and 3) direct the City Manager not to sell any furniture currently located in the Old City Hall until Council makes a decision whether to create a business incubator, otherwise keep the building, sell it, or lease it. ..............--.....-..-.--...............-......-.................................... ..................-.............--..--.-.........................-.......... ............................................-.......-....................................................... ...............-............-...-..-....................... PROPOSED MOTION: "1 move to approve the attached resolution and direct the City Manager not to sell any furniture currently located in the Old City Hall until Council makes a decision whether to create a business incubator, otherwise keep the building, sell it, or lease it." CITY MANAGER APPRO V AL: ~.. ............--.................. ............................-........ ..............-...................-.-....... (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/1012001 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: SUBJECT: June 22, 2004 Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee David M~anager r.'A.~ Derek Mathes~~ A:sistant City Manag~ - Old City Hall surplus furniture and equipment VIA: FROM: Policy Question Should the City Council authorize the City Manager to surplus and sell cubicles, furniture, and other equipment from the Old City Hall, Police Department, and Municipal Court that are not needed in the New City Hall? Background City departments have conducted a thorough analysis of furniture and equipment needs in the New City Hall, and determined that the items in the attached resolution and spreadsheet are not needed after the move. State law and City purchasing policies require that the Council hold a public hearing and authorize the surplus and sale of any item or group of similar items valued at over $5,000. For simplicity's sake, the spreadsheet includes all items currently identified by staff for surplus, even those under $5,000. Staff does not intend to sell any furniture currently located in the Old City Hall until Council makes a decision whether to create a business incubator, otherwise keep the building, sell the building, or lease it out. However, staff still recommends that the Council authorize the surplus and sale now. Doing so gives staff an opportunity to sell items located in the Police Department and Municipal Court before those leases expire on July 31, 2004, potentially eliminating the need to ship and store the items after the lease expires. Options 1. Request that the full City Council hold a public hearing on July 6, 2004, to discuss the surplus of cubicles, fumiture, and other equipment from the Old City Hall, Police Department, and Municipal Court that are not needed in the New City Hall; recommend that the full City Council approve the attached resolution; and direct the City Manager not to sell any furniture currently located in the Old City Hall until Council makes a decision whether to create a business incubator, otherwise keep the building, sell it, or lease it. 2. Modify the attached resolution; request that the full City Council hold a public hearing on July 6,2004, to discuss the surplus of cubicles, furniture, and other equipment from the Old City Hall, Police Department, and Municipal Court that are not needed in the New City Hall; recommend that the full City Council approve the modified resolution; and direct the City Manager not to sell any furniture currently located in the Old City Hall until Council makes a decision whether to create a business incubator, otherwise keep the buildIng, sell it, or lease it. F-l 3. Take no action at this time. Staffwill ship and store unneeded furniture until Council authorizes the surplus at a future date. Proposed Committee recommendation 1) Request that the full City Council hold a public hearing on July 6, 2004, to discuss the surplus of cubicles, furniture, and other equipment from the Old City Hall, Police Department, and Municipal Court that are not needed in the New City Hall; 2) recommend that the full City Council approve the attached resolution; and 3) direct the City Manager not to sell any furniture currently located in the Old City Hall until Council makes a decision whether to create a business incubator, otherwise keep the building, sell it, or lease it. if F- 2 DRAFT :P/?-1/ðY RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DECLARING CERTAIN PROPERTY AS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING ITS DISPOSAL. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way ("City") has purchased the property listed on the attached Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the property included in Exhibit "A" is surplus to the needs ofthe City; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Property Declared Surplus. The property described in the attached Exhibit "A", which is hereby incorporated by reference, is declared surplus to the needs of the City. Section 2. Disposition of Surplus Property Located at Municipal Court and Police Department. Staff, under direction of the City Manager, is instructed to sell all items for the best available price, transfer to another governmental agency in accordance with RCW 39.33.010, or properly dispose of items that cannot be sold or transferred. Section 3. Disposition of Surplus Property Located at Old City Hall. Staff, under direction of the City Manager, is instructed to sell all items for the best available price, transfer to another governmental agency in accordance with RCW 39.33.010, or properly dispose of items that cannot be sold or transferred only after the Federal Way City Council has decided whether to transform Old City Hall into a business incubator. Res. # -' Page 1 Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 5 Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date ofthe resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6 Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this day of , 20- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, DEAN McCOLGAN ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. k:\reso\fumiture surplus Res. # -' Page 2 CM/LA HR/MS CD/PW PS --- PS Records - -- Exhibit A List of Property Old desk Metal open shelving unit Task chair-red 4 Dr Lat Desk Modular Cubicles 4 Dr Lat Microfiche-Lunchroom Microfiche-CD 4 Dr Lat Modular Cubicles Tall bookcase Low bookcase Low bookcase 5 Dr Lat Low bookcase Desk Corner desk Table-oval Modular Cubicles Desk Desk Sorters Tables Bookcase Modular Furniture Desk Storage Shelves Media cart Desk Sorters Computer desk 4 Dr Vert File ---- Desk --- Table-boat Low credenza Lockers Comp!:!t~rdesk Desk Desk 4 Dr Vert File --- -- - Desk - R return Desk m- -- Modular Furniture Desk 30x65 Storage shelf 48x1~_- Bookshelf 24x10 - u n Cashier Desk 27x42 ..- --m- _u .. Table 30x60 _n _nun - - 12 Dr Lat & W 0,~9_rkSUrface -- I~~~~;~~~~S - -~--- ;~:~: --- i L()ckers- 60x 12 TAB Filing System 36x72 12x8 36x18 30x72 36x18 36x18 38x14 32x14 36x15 - 36x18 36x13 30x24 42x42 54x36 30x60 72x30 12x36 --- n 60x30 24x24 24x19 12x36 65x30 15x27 60x30 72x36 63x18 18x75 42x28 60x30 60x30 26x15 72x36 30x60 -- -- - ------- Page 1 --- 1 1 4 2 1 17 5 1 1 1 23 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 58 1 1 8 1 4 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 8 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - 45 $ 45 15 $ 15 10 $ 40 60 $ 120 15 $ 15 75 $ 1,275 60 $ 300 $ - $ - 60 $ 60 75 $ 1,725 7 $ 14 5 $ 5 5 $ 5 75 $ 75 5 $ 5 10 $ 10 20 $ 20 10 $ 10 125 $ 7,250 10 $ 10 10 $ 10 12 $ 96 ------ 5 $ 5 20 $ 80 - ---- 10 $ 20 ----- 9 $ 9 -- 6 $ 6 ------- 5 $ 20 15 $ 15 ---- 20 $ 20 - - - ------ 10 $ 10 --- 35 $ 35 ---- 15 $ 15 20 $ 20 ---- 15 $ 15 10 $ 10 --- 10 $ 10 -- 20 $ 20 -- 25 $ 25 10 I $ 30 -- 75+- $ --~ 10 i $ 10 8r$------a ---"- ---- 5 i$ 5 ,- -- 10 : $ 10 -- 10 i $ 20 , -- 30 $ 30 -- 20 $ 20 -- 15 $ 30 _m- 25 $ 25 --~- 500 $ 500 - - PS - Crime Analysis MC PS - CIS PS - Support Services PS - SIU PS - Intelliqence Tota';~~:{$ll~/;'.., " Exhibit A List of Property Desk Lockers Storage cabinet Storaqe cabinet Desk Panel System Components Bookcase Credenza Credenza Desk - L return Misc panels Lockers Bookcase Desk Low bookcase Tall bookcase Tall bookcase 2 Dr Vert File Table Bookcase Desk Desk chair Desk 60x30 Tall bookcase 30x12 Tall bookcase 36x12 Shelf 48x16 Desk 60x30 Law bookshelves 12x36 Desk 48x24 - Table 24x36 Bookcase 25x12 2 Dr Lat 36x21 4 Dr Lat 36x20 Tall storage cabinet 36x19 4 Dr Vert File 15x27 4 Dr Vert File 15x27 Tall bookcase 36x12 Desk 60x30 Desk 36x20 4 Dr Vert File 15x27 Tall bookcase 12x36 Mobile closet 12x26 Desk 30x60 ~~~~~~i~~ Desk I 48x65 60x24 20x48 24x17 60x30 12x36 60x20 20x72 36x72 54x18 30x12 60x30 30x12 30x11 12x36 25x15 72x32 36x12 60x30 '\ 1 126 1 1 1 50 1 3 1 1 20 5 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 """'~""-iI1I:...~.;.~ ::, ,:,:'~~;:I+""'if~I!it!l!,~" Page 2 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10 $ 10 $ 30 $ 20 $ 10 $ 10 $ 25 $ 75 $ 75 $ 125 $ 10 $ 15 $ 5 $ 10 $ 5 $ 5 $ 6 $ 10 $ 15 $ 6 $ 10 $ 5 $ 10 $ 5 $ 6 $ 5 $ 10 $ 10 $ 15 $ 10 $ 5 ¡ $ ~~ Fr-- 25h¡;- 20 [$ 20 ! $- 6! $ 15 ~ $ 21$- -- 20' $ 6' $ 5 $ 15 $ 10 $ 15 $ 5 $ 7 $ 15 $ 1 S $ $ ":,,,' 10 1,260 30 20 10 500 25 225 75 125 200 75 5 20 5 5 6 -- 20 --- 15 6 10 10 10 5 12 5 20 20 15 10 10 30 60 50 20 20 12 15 2 20 6 5 15 10 ----- 45 5 7 ---- 15 15 15,844:' ---- ----- ---- MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM~1lI[{a ) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Seeking Voter Approval to Maintain Current Property Tax Rate in 2005 (Property Tax "lid Lift".) CATEGORY: BUDGET IMP ACT: 0 0 ~ CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ """"""""""""""'...................................."" ATTACHMENTS: None. """",,"""'0.........................""""""""'"""'....m.__......""""""""" SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: Property taxes pay for 27% of our General/Street services. Maintaining the tax rate will both stabilize and protect this important revenue. The City's portion of property tax rate has dropped from $1.56 in 1997 to $1.30 per $1,000 A V in 2004. The cost to a $200,000 home at the current tax rate is around $22 a month. Without voter approval, we anticipate the tax rate would continue to decline in the foreseeable future. The proposed single-year lid-lift if approved by voters, will keep the tax rate at $1.30 in 2005. This is similar to the Federal Way Fire Department's past and proposed propositions to maintain their portion of the property tax at $1.50 per $1,000 assessed value. If approve, it will increase the tax on an average home by around $1 a month based on preliminary valuation information. Future property tax revenues will continue to be subject to the 1% growth limit set by Initiative 747. ..................................... """""""""""""""""""""""'" CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A PROPOSED MOTION: Direct staff to draft resolution for Council to consider at the July 20 Council meeting. ~~~~~~~...~~~~~~::=~ ..... .......... (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) .......-.................. . COUNCIL ACTION: 0 0 0 0 APPROVED DENIED T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# 1OJ l h ) -------....-...---.--------.--------------------.---.--.---------.---------.--------.--..------- ...-...----------.---.-.----.----------------...-...----.---.-.--------------.--.-----------.- ----- -----------.--.----- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CATEGORY: Retail/Commercial Market Study for City Center/Reallocation of Economic Development funds BUDGET IMPACT: CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS ORDINANCE PUBLIC HEARING OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0 $0 $0 x ------.----------.-.------- -------.------------.--------.------- ATTACHMENTS: Agenda bill and attachments for 6/15/04 City Council meeting SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The issue of a potential retail/commercial market study for the City Center was continued from the 6/15/04 City Council meeting. At this time a more general consideration of the reallocation of available funds to the City Center Redevelopment Strategies work plan, potentially to fund such activities as a retail market study, is on the City Council's agenda related to this issue. Pursuant to the City Council-approved City Center Redevelopment Strategies work plan, City Council has recently been considering such actions as market studies and/or site planning work within the City Center. On 6/3/04 the City Council held a special session to hear a public presentation regarding commercial "lifestyle centers," neo-urbanist town center planning, and their potential applicability to the Federal Way City Center by Mr. Bob Gibbs of Gibbs Planning Group. While City Councilmembers have not decided whether to go forward with a retail or "lifestyle" center market study/analysis, Councilmembers have directed staff to contact several competent national firms that provide market study/analysis services related to retail and/or "lifestyle" centers to provide proposals and budgets for their consideration. After review and consideration of this information and/or proposals, City Councilmembers will be able to make an informed decision about whether to pursue such a market study and, if so, which firm to choose. Regarding potential funding for a market study and other activities related to the Council-approved City Center Redevelopment Strategies work plan, an untapped source of funds has been identified for consideration. In 1997, pursuant to the Downtown Capital Improvement Program, two budget items were approved and remain available: 1. $50,000 for an informational electronic kiosk 2. $5,000 for "story boards" or other graphic media to assist in illustrating potential City Center redevelopment scenarios. In short, these $55,000 in total funds (plus approximately $800 in accumulated interest) have remained untapped since 1997, and no specific plans for their use currently exist. PROPOSAL The City Council could reallocate the above-cited $55,800 for uses pursuant to the Council-approved City Center Redevelopment Strategies work plan. No specific use needs to be identified at this time, but such activities as market studies, site planning, potential development sketches, etc., could be funded with these monIes. -----------------______mmm______---------.---------.--------------------------.-.------------------------------------------.-.-------.----------.----_____.m_____--------------- m_-_-------------.-.----------------- --------------- CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A mm_.___.-.-----.-.-.--.------- -----------------.----------------.---.-.-------.-.----------..-------------..-----..----.---.---.-.------- -------.-------..-.--.-------____._mm- -------.----------------..---.--.-------------------.----------....__m_- ------_._------_._-.-.------- PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to reallocate $50,000 from the electronic kiosk and $5,000 from the downtown "story boards," plus accumulated interest, to a fund for the City Council-approved City Center Redevelopment Strategies work plan. Specific expenditure of these funds will require City Council approvaL" -------.-.-----.-----.---____._m ~ ----------...-.--.-_.___.m_m ----.--.----------.------..-.-.-------------..-------------.------- CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 T ABLEDfDEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST d. rea 109 Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 04/28/2003 MEETING DATE: June 15, 2004 ITEM# ,VlT --------------------------------- - --- ---------______m______---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CATEGORY: Retail/Commercial Market Study for City Center BUDGET IMPACT: CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS ORDINANCE PUBLIC HEARING OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0 $25,000.00 $0 x --------------------------------------------------------------------------------______m_____m______------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Gibbs Planning Group scope of services ------ -- ---- ------ ------------------- - --- -------------- ---- -- --- ----- ----- - - - --- --- --- - - -______m_m m______------- --------------------------------- ---- ------------ --------------- - ------______m_- -- ---- ---- - - - ------------ ----- --------- ----- ---------- ---- SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the City Council-approved City Center Redevelopment Strategies work plan, on 6/3/04 in a special session of the City Council Mr. Bob Gibbs of the Gibbs Planning Group presented a public presentation regarding commercial "lifestyle centers," neo-urbanist town center planning, and their potential applicability to the Federal Way City Center. )on hearing the "lifestyle" center presentation by Mr. Gibbs, City Councilmembers have the option of ",ónsidering further employing the Gibbs Planning Group to produce a "lifestyle center" retail market analysis and redevelopment strategy. If approved at this time, this analysis/strategy could be available later this Summer and would cost $25,000 (less the cost of the 6/3/04 presentation - $2,500). PROPOSAL Gibbs Planning offers a range of services, including retail market analysis and retail development plans (See Exhibit A). The following excerpt from the Gibbs Planning Group's description professional services best describes the potential additional services under consideration: General Retail or Shopping Center Retail Analysis From urban streets to suburban shopping centers, GPG can provide a complete qualitative analysis of existing retail (areas) and make recommendations for improvement. GPG reviews the area's demographics (household income, ages, growth rates, etc.) for the effect on the site's redevelopment potential. At the site, GPG specialists in retail leasing, market research, and commercial planning confer with the client and the client's leasing representatives. Before proposing redevelopment opportunities, GPG evaluates the nearby shopping centers, residential developments, and traffic patterns for their regional impact on the site. Within the site, all existing and planned buildings are assessed for possible retail use in the redevelopment plan. GPG's comprehensive retail analysis includes: . market research tenant mix planning . . vehicular circulation and parking . visual merchandising . storefront design and signage . pedestrian movement . adjacent land uses . appropriate building typologies . retail management . marketing and promotional plans . physical maintenance Shopping Center and Urban Planning Services All of GPG's services are available to assist municipal planners or private developers in creating master plans, which include the latest in retail planning for reviving depressed urban areas or for developing new communities as neotraditional (New Urbanism) towns. GPG produces conceptual land use plans which illustrate building footprints, vehicular circulation, parking, land use codes, and strategic tenant mix, all of which take advantage of retail opportunities, downtown or in shopping centers. If the City Council chooses to go forward with these additional services, the product would be available at a time when review and public comment, potentially by the Economic Opportunity Response Team, would be possible prior to holding a City Center Developers Forum in the Fall. -------------------------------------------------------...-----------------------------------------------...---------...---------- CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A ----------------------------------------------------...------------......----...-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------...--------------------- PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to authorize the City Manager to engage the Gibbs Planning Group to conduct a market analysis for "lifestyle" retail development in the City Center and an associated conceptual redevelopment strategy." ) ~~:~~~::;;~~~~~-~----- ---------- 00 om- -- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED tDENIED T,MI~E»j,QEFE~O ACTIONV()~WlX\lBD TD MOVED TO SECO READING (or~C!ðt1N(U C MŒllNb-ði\ REVISED - 04/28/2003 -:JU.LV l(J I 'WL~I COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # ~'i Hil b f1 A GIBBS PLANNING GROUP Scope of Professional Services gibbsplanning.com Nationally recognized, Gibbs Planning Group offers professional services in town planning, retail analysis, and landscape architecture. For the past twelve years GPG has been active in developing innovative yet practical methods for applying current trends in residential and commercial development to private and public sector clients throughout North America and the Pacific Rim. Founded in 1988, GPG has responded with innovative master plans revealing unexpected design, development, and market opportunities. Foremost among GPG's achievements has been the successful application of the latest in modem retail planning and merchandising to depressed or declining communities as well as to new developments .," designed as traditional towns. Traditional Town Planning and its .", Principles Presenting at the First Congress of the New Urbanism in 1992, GPG has been a pioneer and , leader in this movement J . -, to reVIve the community- oriented principles of traditional town planning as an antidote to the alienating, formless sprawl of suburbia. The New Urbanism and the Necessity of Commerce Profiled in the Atlantic Monthly, GPG is an acknowledged expert in retail planning with "a commercial sensibility unlike anything possessed by the urban planners and architects who usually design downtown renewal efforts." If conventional architects and planners", the feature article continues, "are not greatly concerned about the impact of their work on the welfare of haberdashers, that is not surprising. They belong to professions that are often at war with commercial interests." Robert Gibbs sees the street first as a commercial space. "Nourish commerce," his implicit credo goes, "and the people will come." . , Responsible planning.is not simply a matter of assembling nostalgic urban villages or pedestrian pockets, as some practitioners of the New Urbanism maintain. Rather, GPG believes that sustainable development and vibrant community life are only possible with a vital commercial life, and that new and old towns alike need intelligent strategies for its survival. General Retail or Shopping Center Retail Analysis From urban streets to suburban shopping centers, GPG can provide a complete qualitative analysis of existing retail and make recommendations for its improvement. GPG reviews the area's demographics (household income, ages, growth rates, etc.) for the effect on the site's redevelopment potential. At the site, GPG specialists in retail leasing, market research, and commercial planning confer with the client and the client's leasing representatives. Before proposing redevelopment opportunities, GPG evaluates the nearby shopping centers, residential developments, and traffic patterns for their regional impact on the site. Within the site, all existing and planned buildings are assessed for possible retail use in the redevelopment plan. GPG's comprehensive retail analysis includes: . market research tenant mix planning vehicular circulation and parking visual merchandising storefront design and signage pedestrian movement adjacent land uses appropriate building typologies retail management marketing and promotional plans physical maintenance ) . . . . . . . . . . Shopping Center and Urban Planning Services All of GPO's services are available to assist municipal planners or private developers in creating master plans, which include the latest in retail planning for revìvingdepressed urban areas or for developing new communities as neotraditional (New Urbanism) towns. GPG produces conceptual land use plans which illustrate building footprints, vehicular circulation, parking, land use codes, and strategic tenant mix, all of which take advantage of retail opportunities, downtown or in shopping centers. Neo-Traditional Town Planners use the following methods to simultaneously combat urban sprawl and promote income, age, and racial diversification: . creating high density development nodes (towns) within a region to encourage walking and render regional transit viable . mixing land uses within a town designto cut automobile trip fIequency mixing housing types and prices within a town design to make the housing attractive to a variety of people interconnecting the town to adjacent developments to cut driving distances and accommodate walking between neighborhoods creating distinctive .civic spaces and public buildings within a town to promote a true sense of community. placing emphasis on the public realm of the street by using sidewalks, porches, and building facade continuity . . . . Gibbs Planning Group has a staff of experienced Community Planners, Architects, Landscape Architects, and Retail Analysts that provide full service Traditional Neighborhood Planning including the design of neighborhood commercial and civic centers, neighborhood general areas, and neighborhood epges frOlÌl the conceptual level up through site plan submission. GPG.is experienced in conducting on-site public charrettes that involve design professionals and local interested parties in the design of new communities. GPG Report Page 1 of 2, \ } 'I\vo 1'h.riving M'astcr Planned C=ornrnuniries "1/:.- \'C'tÚI,-wJtI c."omuum's gl"l,'"t!1 ÍJ mr,'oim&4là ~1jw,/;¡)lIII!J~ t:flt-h ¡¿oilJ¡ :l fnmìÞf~/}xi!klF:'~l1i drt"'~$ oricm,-d IOW:á'tls"(?Új>ì"lf!t( ': ;! , " ' ":, , , . ,:"", ',' , \";:~S¡\!o",~dç~~líibil. lö¿~ti:d in BI.'.;cd}' ."", ,", .".." , , ',' ,,', . HiII~; Micbigäll~, b~' sold iisl~oi\i.$ al :1 ~iÚlir("";I{ pic~niu~i 'ar ~~1:i-3J ~h1\e$ ,be orifJn:tl "skiJ1S'P;1C:Ç~ M:LSt<!r 1)lanccd by Gibb~ 1)Ì;!lH;jrlàG~I',:..<I (~Cvcjö}X-d I:r D:i"jd jc!l~èn.\'(IL~t~(¡(d CoßuilC,m's ho):t:s .:\1"(: ¡;.rO\lp::cl ¡Hi)\uid.;I sm::U to\VJI scjLl:m: and ÛI,O:1 I()I!; r~nr;'lf~ from 40'.ïO' witte. Ï\:u\'i, ~....li!:bj~::LU'~ S:<I":UU¡p. C:rdc ~o¡d mo:\t h:;I'nC<; from the s:U,"s trailer pr:or 10 ,!ï~ cmnpbiol1 of Ihe: !1t1x!d, \X.'ilh lots r,1f\gi[',~ from 38'-45', rhi:~I~)Ù'~1:Si!.!s,j fõ!!:c :1 circul:1f r.lt:C¡! Ilnd nmsr 0001<:$ 3!1:: :K.'t.'t:5.1d ,!'m[~h bnL'ç. SR J:!cnhso:l. S:mmi~~ ' <:iick'.s tJ,:-.dop"f s:'!~~. "we (¡¡(In', bow w("¿ h;; $()lcll)l![ of our fìr.~r tWO ph.1.~'~~ !J,hnc we c\'ca opci1C'.d dw modds,~ Ut)rh '$'c~lw(\()d Comm(/I :;:Hi S:1r:lTO{}1 Cirde'~ :\rC' CPG m:",s¡c.r pbnnt-ci con~r.Hmici~'$'" """"M"~i'I"':" ' "'~o(;M.."i~;~"""'~¡~""""""'~~"~~L'~'I1""":""~>O""'t"""" ':"""-~",""Ii\~='" ;*:f~i¡\~ "~~~1Zi~~!~;~¡~k,i~~~¡~: '" ':~~;iß~rin () ;;{!~~;~f;~~$~1~;':1i;:: ¡,~«~~:,<,: Rb&;rH~ibbi}iiil,ii:~~~t,:~,. t}",~;;J:.:vs.e;hill;!,",~' ", :.:/';,,/tlQ u,f;tillÙÚi Cöiift¡'ái(e~,í:,:;;" :,::. : .¡.i:::, , -'.:,::.i:-- :',"","":,,'J;. """'~"':"J"!"""';";¡~¡¡""~""'.""":':"'.':""';'""I,,"""¡' '.,"""":"""'-"""::' "",":'."'",,,","""':,:'..r:',.t" ;t,¿~¡',;;,;:~i.':;i ',,',,:~t'~{~~¡A#rt!i.~J.út~{";'~;;::,H:îKo;j¡~lX;~~P\vd) ~' i:,O¡¡,~:4~y'êóþrl'¡'cnà: Ihis~Iay',¡h:13irn)iógh~~~,~ " '¡;"."':":"':'~-.'r~:.;.r..;,.:I~",",',"" '1~,ï":'I"""I,.,:'.I:,,,...,'..;_L, Next page of this article http://www.gibbsplanning.com/nl,htm 5/27/2004 .LJt'LJ Keport Page 1 of2 $rlì\FF NE\VS . (¡PC i,\ p!c:;~,(.tI m ß!)I1I)UlòC::C Cb'i[ \i:h )"lIal'l(:1 h:~\ join:::! C'I'G from d~1' Du:m:¡ Pl.ucr-ZrbC'.r1: o(¡¡(."\: in Ì'~,jl"th C1mlin.:. i'k i$ Di.r~tcr of Ü!inmnnit)' l'ianI1i,f1t: :¡¡¡d wi!1 be n:$pvn~ib',C; fur plan- nirig¡)i¡)jt:~C,( m.:h;'(s (;1\-.~šcl)Qir\,t('.I:':\1ì11~' " .!<I.~n Mcl)r):'I¡1Id was JI3!11l"ll (þc,: ePG 'C;i1p!CI}'C"cof tbc-, >'('~r. H:)s a. ' L:\ndscáp<." ArchÚ,'(.[ 'j-iIJ is r~!~oJi~¡,~je fY..lr the pbnning and g.'.\phi~s of IrJ:U$' rowi¡ (CmCi projects. ' ' Next page of this article . Mike C:>'I~,?l;.d: is :tIt:> :t nl:W m~l/Ib~r l!" ¡h,: GPG t<::III1. He i~ õ! ~¡;!rf p!<.(JIll"!' am! ,1:"t.hjtl'l.!. :u:d ¡~ re'p{II!~:b!c for P~()Ju:.:- !i(;:1 "lid d':~ign, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIQN 9~. C;OUNTU::S"A\X~\(~P "',,' <.:i){; "'~,~ ~';«:ildi~ .1w~rd',,'J ¡he j,;¡t;[ ¿~;¡'{('I St!~;:'1¡I1"b!e Communiry i\,~.1rd {(or its IIIV"h:c!".wn[ in dw E.1,$tg:\[(~ Town o.~\[~.r r<:dc,'dopm~'nc à.',r'(:cic. Th:s .Iw;~:d. pn'K:w'd \1.1' rhe ~";ati'):l.IJ A<.¡;o-::iatK.iI äCl'\Ir,ti,,~ ~n,,1 i1l..: u,s" CI)Il(~a:n(o.: ',Ii 1\ í.l~'O:~. i~ ¡:¡'."LII III th"~ p:O,k',,:: 1h,a k',,: rdkr:¡s [h,: ht"ndits of ~U,q;l¡Il::,l:j¡ty \~Ìlh¡tl :¡, cúmnlllll;' 'y, \'(.'orki[¡:; with Du'o'l:'r Kohl AsS((!:!.!t's 211.1 GI;U!HI[;J.K"~<,,;¡. l!¡'~ tC.IIB ~TI:'I!,:.3 :: Y!JII ,11::: ('r;((':I1'~"g"~ ;¡ 1:li",!Lm: cr¡.:c:JI:'~- irj~1J1 311\.1 Yth:o:!.lr !;:¡fik. md ;¡,I!o',\'s SIII..I! 1,,:i:.;hb()~hmJ(! p..clu- u> defi:lc ~p:st:<::; h~t\"";(11 IlK: Imildja¡;,'I, http://www.gibbsplanning.com/n12.htm l':i...ilçgc, orbc:.ing the featuttd spcàkd a~ th(- fol1o\\,ing (\'tJH$: CoJi.g.c'cn for, Nc'"" ~lrb:1ni~m 'VII. MiI,\-.u.lkcc; fmèrn:uióñal Co~ndl tif ' ",,-., , SI¡¡;>pping CCI\Ccrs.:<;>;tk!and/(;:difoz'lltl: Ulb;\fi 1~~nJ rnit¡[ute in qlicägo: ' ';'¡,'<lshilll)to!\ ami NtWÏ; Han-:,trd Gr,:i.liuôl.rc 5<11001 of Ik~i~1; 1':lul>man sCiiÕbI'(;,f ~ ' , ' Ar~hjtcctulr; UI\Ì\'clSit~;l)r ¥¡~W~n:; The S~"Ùìdc JJU.Ùtuu:'s P.11l'('.QiÎfet~n(c (11\ .. " ""'..', '""..,"":, '¡ NlW Ulbài\ Rct;iih HoIi:h\dQt«~,1\íO~Vt1 ," , '. ',"",',...,', Amhmhy;Michi¡§tll 'S°9Çt~«,Plaiini~a Oilidals, Gr...oJ R.:.ipill;s;'aÎ¡q 't!-.e..S(~uth('.tit Mkhi~1I1 Wat~~h.:d Coùi¡éiJ, " I)UBLICA'fIONS GPG W~.S [he fe'Jt~ìl'cd'Ncw' Ur~~ni$t 1;1:1". ner in the A!.IgusH5dl tY~w ~;~,,:1ìzi!6',ln'd' ÍlI K<"l.'il"õ<I ami the Dt:I11'J¡l flu. l~s, "New l~k... r:!I il:.:: Old Neighborhood, ~ ,Raben Gibhs w.~ :d:.o illtcn~.......,"Cd bl' Rue r.tdiu- GPG w:;,~ 1i:-.llUp.:d un a S<:P,I~I~¡htr British Bmddcò'\St (/Jrpcir:¡tiö!I's' .f<!~1t~~~" tin" ' ,SolilhEdd's Nor:hl;uuJ ;';'faÙ;,'" Thc, i¡~I<:IV¡\"W ¡¡;¡. bl'èil w¡JdYI¿~bi¡:);¿J¿:(t¡I' t1iroo!~iöï:íï"i!IC" U,S. H,Olr.:-lt Cibb~ p;!itic:iJ':~I<:~LlaJ>f1M..i<: ßm:ldt;\;;¡ 5)'$11:111'$ 1\1;i-Mia,ín;~Uift Id~~i. s:on pwg¡;WI nil s~li)Ur¡'~1I ~p"awl. In add;. lio:¡. Gihhs Phnilir:lt Group W.IS [(i!luted in t!:<: 1.:.1.1 ;¡.n:d<: ()f thc f.eJl i~5¡¡1: c;.f l\1Ülllg:iT! j'itlillm: thc N¡)v¡:mb~r b.m: :)1' l\".-W U,l'(m 1\'<"101. ;uul ;hl: Nm"<.'illb::-rimll:' of 17.,:- jò;~m Pr;pl!l: ' f;.¡¡'i:-::( 1;,:." CM"" OTHER NEWS Tia~ ColIgrt"ssJor Ncl" -. Urb;mi~m (CNO) ~~'m Ince¡ :!I Portland, Örc!:."m 10 l"Xp!OI"C ¡be: ~ ('",Iirics of SP:¡C\:" JUlie: 15 - 18,2000, 'fIx; CNU i~ J n<1J1-p;ofit IIIL:n\b::t" sbir ()Q;l.ni7.:dO!1 &:dk<l~ II) õ!ddc::....~inl: [he d~;¡lIct1&d; of mh3n sprawl :JOd rheiè!itt)/'~. ric>."! of t'Xis:in¡~ urban C(.'mcrs .md towns. CNlJ is I"ca~ .I[ The I ic...õs; Bui!ding. S Third Smx'.c. ~l!;;~' 7'?:"j ill S'!I1 Fr:ln,Úc:\). CA 94013- ',',:::; ,,', 5/27/2004 GPO Report Page 1 of 2 ~~,{f :;;~.;:,' :','1'1'1'£ ",:,;~, :!i',:.;:E, h"",' ",,-t\,., Z~!ci<. ~;'?", ""..l.,., ~~.r,: ~' ¡~~~..">~ ~;~!~ æ~;l:1: '., " "'. ~ ¡;i~{,:,'.;:r~th~;,{:,;;,;"~>,, "".;i,:':,,~),i,}~.:>;'.,.. , .,,:;.,::.i't;\i~1~'~';:""":J:~' ~~~~¿,~::.(,,:, .. ':,<., . ",' :"¥r'.";;, :. ",,:',,'. .', c,¡'&hl)rpcu..(ifG'"~,,, "'~'~;~~i-rj~:¡<it'té~i',' "',.1*~ß«~¡$r:@û;f,;:':":" .,'., ," :;~':~,-' '~1ï,~.J":,,,/,'W(~ë.:(t~t'-';,;~'~.~f'.,:~' " : '~;;i,:>. :"':<':,dxJ)pléé..~.'liri'~ièi1$h "~.,I" :",,~~,,:,~,tl"""" ,~: "';'~~",",1:4,,' ,r;,,~;M"~"",.t:;:":;',",,"I',::,',;<,~",'¡~IJ~',:',';~:(P,':'~~:;' ",'~,'"'~,:,.~,;'~,'~,"',",',,;,Ioq", .",kiÞ,2", ,Cii" , ", ,":,,',,"::~ """lie "-"""":nusr,f1aJJ.tscoromè ""',.'1",,""j '!{'.' ,"r"" " , . "t,.:' ~,~:: '/~f:'('ft/:""¡:;'\1:...;!,.,.1~'4;'~' '.,:('};:::';',!~!!n,'1~ç~ ":CiltÇt: , ""',l~',:" ,t.r,t;,r(}r~ ".". '~~';" 'n r¿~: >"'"",'; ,', "'::""1"~'~,'.~"f,."""",."""~..~,,jt;¡."l"'S,'r'f¡;f.(¡¿",, 'l¡~""'~'P."'",G',','",, "';,',"",',","","",','1(-":"I'"""",':/i,'\"""'~""::',"\"( ;",',"~'l:"i:~~","':»",~.,',;.' ,", 'Wi1rr~cûi'o g:i' "';.:,~:<:'f/., 'l¡Ir'ru,.fþ" \1:,!, 1 ',', "1:";" ,.>:,,' '~' W{:l.Il:rs' 'å\lrà¡n~,~yd:~ ~':.~;~ ~",," '~?'¡-",;¡, ':¡;'I".'" :" ',",';' ;',(~íi('b,~"r.A""""",,,..<¡1<:"'l":, 'd,,'i'ð",':.!'.\,,' "'ì",'l',Z"""""'" :i¡:,',":'~"d:';¡:', ' :ri.';:'\',Y:"'>'\:,';~f:'r',~~,~: -;':':1\.'" ,.tøehp,lque'sÎll\' ,,(J. ",,:,".:~... S,~~.~'~fllnc", f~~,~n(..".~,,',' .)~r~tp~'", ' :o(I,~C:~.,!'!,,!;~~ut' ,,;i ,,'(tf/¡~è~Î1~rs~¡¥9::';;~i' ';:",':aR:I~,~ti:éf~:m'l,11+:qèr pl;in'~"'!1~\\'~~j~.:,,::::'" ' 'rrorn'd~;;'V.i:I~i~l~lli[~\'~~lij~ii%<~"'" " "'m, , " ",(k,' n~~v:-ñi~d'~~~, ¡,¡~,;','u"tii.,\, ":,:, ',,',,' ",nC::rC9' ro\~i.1,'i,Cc:,', *c:r (~; {~C,'P(l",)O~,OO., , :-:¡'\S wl~(f~s'~,~çÍt, '~,:',t,'D'a~k,:"",U\,ø,:ìilid:(,hê,":O:: ' '."'.1""", I'll"'" '"':" """T, "",'"n:,"'.J"""'",!",v""""" , 'paikipg'i'à'ci9s;: ",:' """,':> "':;,~>',:"", ,'.'I,,:ç (~pa$C ~C()-t~i,(\on,1I,I'n~çr:,' :, 'l~("(ks{íän'dl#~è~~";$rih~:p!j,r,~,;",:",: , ,,":~¡::~;,,¡.:, ", ",., , , ,<,,~","i, ' : ': pl~nncd COI\\J'Íí'.1rii,..,.; 1,n.C'~iI'(,:(/ in,' n~. ¡O'¡i.'Í'I i:t-i~(CtSViJf~incÙaH ... . , 'ql?gt~#i!litff)4iti~~ti!~F,:'i::i¿.),. ,'. i'~~*1d~iiJÄ t~Ó~dll: Tne ë¡)mn~(;~!'£)" J\~'\~' n,ickÌ1{$~!~~í '\~~ill:iU¿I~~hts , Þ¡œì¡~:rt.iú¡Q~f l~ÚiìJ;;';i/',~:',': .: ":,~~iII iiÙ:I~~~ûi 50.000:$q\]:uc:fë(tplUUl~1 a.~Îif:iJ\~'s~ík;¡ï~f¥;: , '\,:,.:c~G';~rshà~íä)~i~ri Gf~~h~~(, '.,,'.'().rr<".riÌ,il~ ~~t:¡~.~n,1:t;300.(jò~S\lua~{~" $d¡(;()II~t~t~dìÚft)~~i~h~=. '~¡{~~'~~~~iol'~~\h;'¡h~Q~~:~~'\d <1rølj1t~;;200 livt--wç,k ¡o~,:i1:"oml/.., , Pldnn~d,:&b.r~',b¡.{~¡i't~,:t';"'Ir:ø~~~;: 'J~t:: "'tuil<hi> advis!f!b¿:"i '¿II' ,md 300 $il1glc.'-r~n1i{y n..'n1t,i."~ II:.: iowi1 ¿~lIi(!r .;~.!!rJntfii<l~ ~~~ ),:< ~,¡r~;~1' ' ." ','" '~4ö1fií)...t~tP~ï;1Y.ì'ì'.' ,.'.~ ~.tn'sJìc¡t'phas!:,;willt~m~ ,~hc.'{".'-"" .," ,. ,}.. 'O,OW.' ' '\;~pf;~f.~~.~~.,'" , ... ,:""":;, , ;'j".." '>1,'..... :~~~~,~r:";~~~,~~4uW~¡n~,;~~t}~~~~J~~i#'S~~~:#.~,~~~!~~~~~;ij:.</",~,."~:,,~ffi~~~( ~~~~~l~~"~~~;:,,\:fT¡¡\,~ b~.~íd,i"I1:~~litb-!ongih.¡ênsi~;~ ,'; ,:' ~3 ri.\d3ril~ tcñvl;i~({Uaté.;~~kìnt i$":" ((:)~à ;\Iy," ",)iluh,.ftùn;J{ "":"":' pl#i}illi(:h~reín' (or fOIl; óf the.: ' .. 3C:~(,'1I1¡n:,J:m.-d hut" on-afrc(:t aiu! ' n.'si~kl1tÌ~I~~liogs., ' rl:Î14's,k~' 1~~b:¡11 pmV"-ni,I.'1::-" flelel i~ wjrl~stlrt~1C~.})U~Ìt1f, !ou 5IIfrt)l]/lc!('¡ h()t!1 S}.Jri~:~11d Mclh(lurnc:,: ml: (';1)\1 hylm..:. ret;;¡! hm!dll.f~" " " ( ( ) , "" n,¿ i:"'i" ,.vi t>:.trJ .t;,.' ,f;.. ...,:,. J ¡",'c¡;'~.rJ)ltli. :/'1-1,.,,; 1.:,':¡"'~^~' iwi.alil. It CW'":t f~~:..~&~. /in' ¡".{ .~"';;' ..,il~ H"';'¿ 11.;"'1 q/slr~b;: ~rl .. ¿'~1 ",.,. "'¥~;'.!:' ~~¡¡:'m~' ¡",;;¡~,'tl..ìÿ!,.¡-.' ~¡rJ/i1,~/'tu~1II! '. , ': <:i~'~),,~;,:/ ' r Next page of this article http://www.gibbsplanning.com/nl3.htm 5/27/2004 . Lil'Li Keport ".' ,",'" ",,'," ':'~::t ~,': : , ' " ""?:~.::~J,'/'¡,:~ J,' t'/:;~n',"'~J,',:',':," , ,j';,,'o~!!.f!:' /~:" " 7~f)pj~~¡¥:~ ~i,', , ' ~-tIl,';~j.,;t¡¿1rl~i1', ','" ~"",t'¡>:,":;',")"""'~"'¡<';""" ,.,,' ~~t!!~:!1~C:~'9>-~,n~uwy , ,~~~"p~!!~~j:il#"þt.i~,n j ng .:,; "';:~~~!q~:~)', " ' ' 9~h':p¥ý,':~,c: ' w¡lh:r.ë:tIÙl~ rim'c ' . ~ ~~i1ior ;ciTii;n~i3(d 2 ,~iI'~-oml~d91( ",',,<""" " , ' " ," ;amrÒ~i7 [CI1 ~èfci of P,I;Ç,' :tfi~~!\ þi"ij~O:t ~r~~!rt.~~#~,:þ~:~i¡â " 9it1I:~ill.~I)~;~:rhè ~~.~~{~,~fd~~~~i~::~ n "~,:ñ.,>,',;¡;èé:~::~:èt:,:,...." ":;;.1,' I,' >.: ~I'~,:;",..,",~"P~,'~'J~~.o ,::. ".~,il'Spnnß J!OOP. fit " ;;~i'ji;~~~7~":,::;{::~:_:::)'J " ~';~:J'¿-';"~:,);lj~:::~ß'., ,:,Tf4~,/Plj;¡";,' , I: ,,~.:';:~~::i~:' "..{~~t'f.:t~: ,~'W'!JlWI 1::;;[' ,~i:'~ác!'j~:J.~h~~i,íl:',:,in,'~1\"oÌl,b' ", "': "~,Ç~~!lt~. :MWfi,¡s,i,n;:~~7.qiicd, ~..tr ':~i~lj#)';{~\1C .1~~\'~I\~ip' ((Ir :),Ncw ,. --: :.~#~¡k¡:~v:ift~n~::~_b:,!si;tl upoit ,',~~}{~~¡~~,:;:~i ,>q;~~'è;',{,>-'" ¡, " . Next page of this article Page I of 2 --"---""""'-'-:<","W"-'-~"'~"'" -; , ."{~r.';;'" l.""r C';:T.;" é~N i< ill ¡", ,~c.!.-. 1Î;r 7i!~-lilÛi' nil/, ;ÎI.,;u~ i;;"l;"'¡¡"':,~ <r,-,": J..,:-.,'(' ",'.r! d ¡",.;Mm.' 'fi,,;'¡r~~;..£ I';"':~; ,..,1. ..,11~'( "..~.' http://www.gibbsplanning.com/n14.htm 5/27/2004 GPG Report Page I of 2. ~. ,. ,. Next page of this article http://www.gibbsplanning.comlnl5 .htm 5/27/2004 f ! , () ;--¡ .uru 1\.epun Page 1 of 2 );;:;j!1!~!~ ", ':;':!"'§~"{\I " ":0, ' , """I"!.~,~JJ"(" ,r., , ""\iì:gi.óat!/ ' " ':'>:~;l:;:~'" '.. .. ..', , ,I" '. i¡i~:)/~~!r~~~fjf "" . " ,14:> t¡i~ç¡;, ~'a.n .Ii.l~t¡N~¡IIAM ... ,) '.,', .¡:~:o~;~~""¡",~;,;~~~:~\",,, " :.~~!j: '.', ',' " " " , , . " , "." '". , " , , ",' ,,' " , , ' " .:¡; :'~'" ,,' " " '. ., , ," ..x' " ", , ,;,:,' , , , , " " Previous page of this article http://www,gibbsplanning.com/n16.htm 5/2712004 / MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 i' -/ITEM# 1llI- (C ) -~--~-~-- n- ..._~ - ~~~~--~---------~~---Q-~-~~-~-~-~;::~~----- ---~-- - - - ---- ---~~ --------- CITY ~ÉRAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL ( " SUBJECT: Parkway Annexation Initiating Resolution ------'-"'--'- -_._-----------~- -----------------'--- CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: 0 CONSENT [8J RESOLUTION [8J CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0 $0 $0 ----~---- ~~- ------ ---~~------_._---_._--------~------_.__._.- '---~~--- --- ATTACHMENTS: Draft Southwest Parkway Annexation Initiation Reso]ution, Legal Description (to be inserted when complete), Revised Parkway Annexation Area Map, Map showing the parcels eliminated horn original Parkway annexation proposal and Map showing "Stone Creek" subdivision and revised Parkway annexation area \ '\ --_u_------ ____n- -------------- SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: On May 18,2004 City Council passed a resolution initiating review of the Parkway annexation and authorizing staff to submit a notice of intent to the King County Boundary Review Board. Further analysis and updated mapping of the annexation area revea1ed that a parcel in the southeast portion of the annexation area has been subdivided under King County jurisdiction subsequent to adoption of the City's Potential Annexation Area (PAA). The subdivision, called "Stone Creek" lies partially within the proposed Parkway annexation area and Federal Way P AA and partiaHy within the Milton P AA. As origina1ly proposed, the southern boundary of the Parkway annexation (which coincides with the southern boundary of the Federal Way PAA) would bisect three lots within the "Stone Creek" subdivision (see attached "Stone Creek" map). To avoid the undesirable scenario of bisecting lots with corporate boundaries, staff proposes a modification to the boundaries of the proposed Parkway annexation. We recommend eJìminating the entire "Stone Creek" subdivision horn the current annexation proposal. AdditionaHy, we recommend e1iminating four additional lots directly north of "Stone Creek". Eliminating these additional lots will result in a more regular corporate boundary. The Secoma Salvage and Towing auto yard is within the area proposed to be eJíminated from the Parkway annexation proposal. E1iminating the above referenced parcels úom the Parkway annexation allows the majority of the area to be annexed as planned. The total size of the annexation proposal will go from 245 acres to 23] acres. Note, the eliminated area will remain a part of the Federal Way PAA and can be annexed into the City at some point in the future, after negotiations with City of Milton. Although timing is tight, we should be able to stay on schedule to bring the Parkway annexation proposal to the Parkway area voters on the November 2, 2004 general election ballot. ---- ----------.------- ~_._------ - --n- ----- CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC voted to direct staff to proceed with the Parkway annexation in 2004, in coordination with adoption of the PAA Subarea PIan. --------------- ----~---------------- -- - ----------------------~------------------ - ---- --------------- PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the resolution calling for an election to put before the voters the question of annexation of the revised Parkway area and to direct staff to fiIe a notice of intent with the King County Boundary Review Board." ~I~:~~AGER :;p~O ~,:~-~ -- - - --- - - --- - - ---- ---- -- - --- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D T ABLEDillEFERREDINO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 RESOLUTION NO. DRAFT 71Í/ð i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORA TED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY LYING IN AN AREA GENERALLY EAST OF EXISTING CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY LIMITS, SOUTH OF S. 369TH ST. AND 19TH WAY S., WEST OF THE EAST BOUNDARY OF "PARCEL X" IN THE REGENCY RIDGE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AND ENCHANTED PARKWAY, AND NORTH OF EXISTING CITY OF MILTON CITY LIMITS AND POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA BOUNDARIES (PARKWAY ANNEXATION) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, has determined that it would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Federal Way and the annexing area to annex certain property east of existing City of Federal Way City limits, south of 369th St. S. and 19th Way S., west ofthe east boundary of "Parcel X" in the Regency Ridge Condominium development and Enchanted Parkway and north of existing City of Milton City limits and Potential Annexation Area boundaries, legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act (GMA) and the King County Countywide Planning Policies encourage transition of unincorporated urban and urbanizing areas within Potential Annexation Areas from county governance to city governance; and WHEREAS, the Parkway area is within the City of Federal Way's Potential Annexation Area; and WHEREAS, although financial analysis of revenues and costs for the Parkway territory indicate a net annual deficit to the City of Federal Way of approximately $11,000, the benefits of Res.#_Page I annexing the territory, which include compliance with the GMA, localized regulatory control and localized provision of services, outweigh the financial costs; and WHEREAS, the Homeowners Association Board of Regency Woods (located within the Parkway area) has submitted to the City a memorandum indicating their support for this annexation; and WHEREAS, the City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee considered the Parkway annexation at the meeting of September 29, 2003 and at the meeting of November 3, 2003 recommended to City Council to proceed forward with annexations in 2004; and WHEREAS, the City Council was briefed regarding the Parkway annexation on December 2, 2003 and directed staff to proceed forward with this annexation in 2004; and WHEREAS, on May 18, 2004, the City Council passed a resolution initiating the review process for the Parkway annexation and directing staff to submit a notice of intent to the King County Boundary Review Board; and WHEREAS, subsequent research of the Parkway annexation area has revealed that the original proposed boundary would bisect three lots that have recently been created through a formal subdivision process under King County Jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the legal description of the proposed Parkway annexation area is hereby revised to exclude lots that would be bisected as well as adjacent property in order to create a logical corporate boundary; and WHEREAS, the City Council is in the process of adopting the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan, which when adopted will become a part of the City's Comprehensive Plan and which establishes Comprehensive Plan designations and zonIng classifications for the proposed annexation area as well as general land use policies; and Res.#_Page2 Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public Interest. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Federal Way and the annexing area would be served by the annexation of certain contiguous unincorporated territory lying in the area east of existing City of Federal Way City Limits, south of 369th St. S. and 19th Way S., west of the east boundary of "Parcel X" in the Regency Ridge Condominium development and Enchanted Parkway and north of existing City of Milton City limits and Potential Annexatíon Area boundaries, legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. Section 2. Voters. As nearly as can be determined the number of voters residing in the aforesaid territory is 639. Section 3. Election. The City Council hereby calls for an election to be held pursuant to Chapter 35A.14 RCW to submit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for annexation. Section 4. Taxation and Indebtedness. There shall be submitted to the electorate of the territory sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property located within the City of Federal Way is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Federal Way, which indebtedness has been approved by the voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to or existing at, the date of annexation. Section 5. Zoning. All property located within the territory to be annexed shall, simultaneous with the annexation, have imposed the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Res. # - Page 3 and zoning designations, prepared under RCW 35A.14.330, and depicted in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan. Section 6. Cost of Election. The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of Federal Way. Section 7. Resolution to be filed. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this resolution with the King County Council and with the King County Boundary Review Board. Section 8. Notice of Intention. The City shall also file with the King County Boundary Review Board a Notice of Intention hereof as required by RCW 36.93.090 et seq. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase ofthis resolution. Section 10. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority, and prior to the effective date, of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 11. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this day of 2004. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Mayor, Dean McColgan Res. # - Page 4 A TrEST: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERIC PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION No: Res. # - Page 5 -¡¡ " :ë c " :: " " " 0. !! .š "C 0. "C C 0. .5 .!! c " E <I: :.ë I- 0; ë z 0.: <I: '" 0.: ë: City of Federal Way Revised Parkway Annexation Area rv~ap Date: Jul¥ 2004 City of Federa, Way. 33530 Fi~t Way S. Federal Way, WA 980C3 (253) 651-40Qû www.cltycffederalway.cor:'. Ñ'" ':':~ Fëderal Way 0 250 500 ~ Feet i!ci:keicd!paa/SWParkway.mxd > < g 1: < 0 £ .£ 13 :¡:: C <': c: <': v: <': '" ~ .E '" '" '" c '" .š .!O c '" E v: :¡:: I- ¡,; Õ z Q) '" co Q) ã: City of Federal Way Revised Parkway Annexation - Eliminated Area Map Date: July 2004 City of Federal Way, 33530 First Way S, Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 661-4000 www.cityoffederalway.com !~ c . 'ü :> Scale: 6 --, CITY Of 250 500 N -~ Federal Way I Feet . /1 el rkel cd/paa/S WP a rkway. mx d ~ ~ <: c.; " ~ .E </ " ~ c:: ~ ~ ;; c:: c:: </ a: ~ E ~ ¡,; õ z '" </) '" '" ã: City of Federal Way ~I.ap Date: J~lï 2004 City of Federa! Way. 3353::1 FI:'St Way S. Federa! Way, WI, 96CJ3 (253) 661-4000 'I¡v.w.ci~ýcffederalway.c:;:n Co ~~"'.i,..L:';¡ . .." f.~ ( :> ~ J:J.;.ì: ,- .- Scale: _\ " -, CITY Of ~ Federal Way Revised Parkway Annexation - Stone Creek Detail 250 500 I Feet lleirke/cd/paa/SWParkway. mxd MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM#~II//I - (g) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan CATEGORY: BUDGET IMP ACT: 0 CONSENT D RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS rg ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0 $0 $0 --------......-...------------- A TT ACHMENTS: Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan Adopting Ordinance and Exhibits. ---------------...-------------------------------...--- ...-...------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: As a chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan establishes pre-annexation Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations, and general policies regarding land use, transportation, environment, capital facilities, public services, annexation and other issues. As required by state law, two public hearings have been held to gather and consider public input. -----------...--------------... ------------------------------- CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On May 3, 2004 and May 24,2004 the LUTC reviewed and recommended the Final Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan be approved as proposed with the following recommendations regarding four site specific zoning requests: Apply the Community Business Comprehensive Plan classification and BC zoning with companion Comprehensive Plan text amendment and development agreement (at time of annexation) to the Jackson property (adjacent to northbound 1-5 freeway on-ramps on the north side of S. 320th Street). Apply the Neighborhood Business Comprehensive Plan classification and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning to the Davis site located at 30682 Military Rd. S. Apply the Single Family High Density Comprehensive Plan classification and RS9.6 zoning (9,600 square foot lot sizes) to the North Lake frontage lots on the east side of North Lake. Apply the Neighborhood Business Comprehensive Plan classification and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning to the Rabie site located south of 288th St. S. and east ofI-5. ----------------------------------... ------------------------------- PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the 1 st reading of the ordinance and to direct staff to schedule a 2nd reading of the ordinance on July 20, 2004, adopting the proposed Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan as recommended by the LUTc." ".................-.-.."""" VN\ '- CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) """'."""'.......-....... COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED - 05/10/2001 COUNCIL BILL # 1ST d. rea mg Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # 3,/ò DR AFT (ì/2- 7/Ó f ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER EIGHT "POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SUBAREA PLAN" OF THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AMENDING CHAPTER TWO "LAND USE", AMENDING CHAPTER FOUR "ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT" AND REPEALING THE EXISTING CHAPTER EIGHT "POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREAS." WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Chapter 36.70A RCW or "GMA") requires the City of Federal Way to adopt a Comprehensive Plan which includes a land use element (inclùding a land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities element, and transportation element (including transportation system map[s]); and WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations implementing its Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its Comprehensive Plan with land use map (the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the Comprehensive Plan, land use map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998, September 14,2000, and November 1,2001 and March 27, 2003; and WHEREAS, under RCW 36.70A130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to continuing review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than once per year; and WHEREAS, the Council shall be considering three separate actions to amend the Comprehensive Plan, all of which will be acted upon simultaneously in order to comply with RCW 36.70AI30; and WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 04-_, a change in Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM 3600) and associated development agreement and development plan for 46.58 acres located south of S. 336th Street ORD# ,PAGEl between Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5 pertaining to the Christian Faith Center proposed development; and WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 04- , a request from the Quadrant Corporation to remove the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the Comprehensive Plan and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List); and WHEREAS, these actions include the adoption of a Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan, which will replace Chapter 8, "Potential Annexation Areas" of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and address certain Comprehensive Plan text changes in Chapter 2, "Land Use" and Chapter 4, "Economic Development" pertaining to the Community Business (Be) Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning classification; and WHEREAS, the last of these actions, adoption of a P AA Subarea Plan and associated text changes to the "Land Use" and "Economic Development" Chapters of the Comprehensive Plan, is the subject of this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, in conjunction with neighboring jurisdictions has adopted P AA boundaries; and WHEREAS, the GMA encourages the annexation of urban and urbanizing areas within P AAs where urban level facilities and services can be provided; and WHEREAS, the GMA, State annexation law, County-Wide Planning Policies of King County, King County Comprehensive Plan, and Federal Way Comprehensive Plan encourage cities to prepare in advance a comprehensive subarea land use plan that will become effective if and when the P AAs are annexed pursuant to Chapter 35.13 RCW; and WHEREAS, King County partially funded and actively participated in research and preparation of the proposed Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments; and ORD# , PAGE 2 WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan text and maps reflect and incorporate new and expanded information pertaining to the P AA including, but not limited to, Comprehensive Plan designations; zoning classifications; policies regarding land use; transportation; environment; parks; housing; capital facilities; and public service: as well as fiscal impacts associated with annexation; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.13 .177 authorizes the City to adopt pre-annexation Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning classifications as a component of the Comprehensive Plan, including adoption of Comprehensive Plan and zoning maps, provided the designations shall not be amended within one year of adoption; and WHEREAS, the City may consider Comprehensive Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Article IX, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC); and WHEREAS, four individual property owners submitted requests for certain P AA Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning classifications; and WHEREAS, the four individual requests described above are incorporated into the proposed P AA Subarea Plan Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments addressed in this ordinance (collectively "Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments"); and WHEREAS, the Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments include proposed modifications to the BC zone locational criteria in the Land Use and Economic Development chapters of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on February 18,2004, the City SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non Significance on the Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS, the Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments are consistent with all of the goals and requirements set forth in the GMA, which encourages annexation planning; and WHEREAS, the City, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council Committees, and full City Council, received, discussed, and considered public testimony and written comments, and materials ORD# , PAGE 3 regarding the Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments, resulting from the following public outreach and public hearings: l. Three public meetings with homeowner's associations; 2. Three public open houses within the P AA and the City; 3. A City Planning Commission public meeting held March 3, 2004; 4. City Planning Commission public hearings held on March 17, 2004, April 7, 2004 and April 21, 2004, following which it recommended adoption of the Plan text and map amendments with three modifications; 5. City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee public meetings on May 3, 2004 and May 24, 2004 following which it recommended adoption of the Plan text and map amendments with four modifications; and 6. Two City Council public hearings on June 1,2004 and July 6,2004, as required by RCW 35A.14.340; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments as recommended by the Land Use and Transportation Committee. Now, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings. The Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments reflect new or updated information developed since the initial adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, and are specifically related to the City's Potential Annexation Area. They bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; are in the best interest of the residents of the City; and are consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW, the King County County-Wide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Section 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Adoption. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, 2001 and 2003, including its Land Use ORD# , PAGE 4 element map, copies of which are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby are and shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A (Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan), B (Amended Land Use Chapter) and C (Amended Economic Development Chapter) attached hereto. Copies of Exhibits A, Band C are on file with the Office of the City Clerk and are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 3. Amendment Authoritv. The adoption of Plan amendments in Section 2 above is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541. Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and 1996 Zoning Map, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, and 2001, shall remain in force and effect until the amendments thereto become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance. Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ,2004. day of ORD# , PAGE 5 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Mayor, Dean McColgan A TIEST: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE No: ORD# , PAGE 6 EXHIBIT A ~¡~~. '., , -!:>,j~f1;~~~1'9~~\i Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan Proposed Final December 2003 ~ti~~'>:"', ' ~ CITY OF 'fI' '7 Federal Way CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Federal Wav Citv Council: Jeanne Burbidge (Mayor) Jack Dovey Eric Faison Mary Gates Linda Kochmar Dean McColgan (Deputy Mayor) Mike Park Federal Way Planning Commission: John Caulfield (Chair) William Drake Dini Duclos Hope Elder (Vice Chair) Marta Justus Foldi David Osaki Grant Newport Christine Nelson (Alternate #1) Tony Moore (Alternate #2) Merle Pfei fer (Alternate #3) Lawson Bronson (Alternate #4) Potential Annexation Area Steering Committee: Hope Elder, Federal Way Planning Commission William Drake, Federal Way Planning Commission Eric Faison, Federal Way City Council Linda Kochmar, Federal Way City Council Lois Kutscha, Resident Representative Thomas Murphy, Federal Way Chamber of Commerce Gail Pearson, Resident Representative Paul Reitenbach, King County, ODES Ed Stewart, Commissioner, Lakehaven Utility District Bev Twiddle, Commissioner, Lakehaven Utility District Geri Walker, Federal Way School District Potential Annexation Area StajT Work Group Representatives of the following Agency Departments and Divisions have participated: City of Federal Way Community Development Services- Planning Division City Manager's Office Management Services-Finance Division Management Services-GIS Division Parks and Recreation Department Public Safety Department Public Works-Solid Waste Division Public Works-Surface Water Management Division Public Works-Transportation Division Other Agencies: Federal Way Fire Department Highline Utility District King County DDES Lakehaven Utility District Puget Sound Energy Agency Report Preparation Team: Consultant Report Preparation Team: City of Federal Way, Department ofCommunity Development Services, Project Management City Federal Way, GIS Division, GIS Mapping Services King County, ODES. Data Coordination Jones & Stokes, Project Management ECONorthwest Henderson, Young and Company Mirai Associates Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. December 2003 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Subarea Plan.........................................................................................,.......... 1 PAA Location and General Characteristics """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'" I Subarea Plan Relationship to Other Elements """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'" 2 Subarea Planning Process and Concepts.......................................................................... 2 Public Input Process .........................................................................,................................3 POLICY BACKGRO U N D....................................................................................... 5 2.1 Statewide Planning Goals..................................................................................................5 2.2 Countywide Planning Policies """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 6 2.3 City Planning Goals or Policies .............................................................."........................ 8 2.4 Consistency of Subarea Plan with Key State, Countywide, and Local Planning Goals 8 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA................................... 9 Federal Way PAA Boundary """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 9 Accomplishments since 1991 Issue Paper...................................................................... 10 Feasibility Analysis........................ ........ .... ....". .... ........... ................................. 11 Annexation Feasibility Analysis Purpose....................................................................... 11 Study Area Population.....................................................................................................13 Feasibility Study Methodology......... ..........,. .......................... ..........".... ........,. ......". ..... 14 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................. 15 Summary of Inventory......... .........."....... ................... ...... ............. ....."......... ....... ...."...... 15 Environmental Goals and Po licies """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 18 LAND USE...................--....................................................................................... 19 Existing Land Uses ..". ....,.... """""""""" ............, """""'" ................................, ....."...... 19 Land Use Plan...... .....".......... .."................. ..................".. ..................".................... ........21 Land Use Goals and Policies........................................................................................... 25 H 0 USI NG ....... .....".......... ."..... ........ ........... ..... ........... .... ........... ......... ................ 26 Summary of Inventory.......... ........................"........ ........... .......................... .....".. ........... 26 Housing Goals and Policies....... ................ ............. .....,.. ......... ..."................ """"""""'" 28 P ARKS AN D R EC REA TION ... ................... ............... .... ........... ........ ..................... 29 Summary of Parks Planning Efforts and Inventory .......................................................29 Future Parks and Recreation Needs... ...".. ..... ......"... ................ ................. ..... ................30 Parks & Recreation Goals and Policies ..........................................................................33 SURF ACE WATER.... .............. ........... .... ...... ...... ....... ..... .............. .............. ..... ...... 34 Summary of Inventory....................................... ........ ........ ........."........... ........." .............34 Future Surface Water Needs .............................................................................,............. 37 Surface Water Goals and Policies................................................................................... 41 TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................................42 10.1 Summary of Inventory .......................................................................................,.............42 10.2 Existing and Future Transportation Levels of Service ..................................................43 10.3 Transportation Goals and Policies ..................................................................................49 PRIVATE UTILITI ES ......." ..........., ......, .... ................... ....... ..... ........ ............... ......... 51 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 7.1 7.2 8.1 8.2 8.3 9.1 9.2 9.3 ii December 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 12 11.1 Summary of P AA Inventory ...........................................................................................51 11.2 Private Utilities Goals and Policies ................................................................................52 PUBLIC SERVICES AND CAPITAL FACILITIES ..................................................... 53 12.1 Inventory of Public Services Likely to Change as a Result of Annexation .................53 12.2 Summary of Fiscal Impacts and Strategies .................................................................... 55 12.3 Services Unlikely to Change as a Result of Annexation:.............................................. 61 12.4 Public Services and Capital Facilities Goals and Policies ............................................64 PUB LlC P ARTI C I PATIO N.................... .."................. ............................................ 66 13.1 Public Participation Goal and Policies ...........................................................................66 GOVERNANCE AND INTER-JURISDICTIONAL COORDINATION...................... 67 14.1 Governance/Interjurisdictional Goals and Policies........... .......... ........... .......... """"""" 67 ANNEXATION ....................................................................................................68 15.1 Annexation Goals and Policies """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'" 69 TECHNICAL REFERENCES TO THE SUBAREA PLAN ............................................ 72 13 14 15 16 List of Tables Table 1 Year 2000,2002,2003, and 2020 Population and Housing ........................................13 Table 2 Existing Land Use by Parcel.......................................................................................... 19 Table 3 PAA Housing Sales and Affordability .......................................................................... 28 Table 4 P AA Park Facilities Owned by King County............................................................... 29 Table 5 P AA and City Parks Levels of Service .........................................................................30 Table 6 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Cost for Parks and Recreation....... 31 Table 7 In-Road Surface Water ..Facilities................................................................................. 35 Table 8 Regional Stonnwater Facilities..... ...... ............. ..... ........ ........... ..... ....... ....... ........ ...........35 Table 9 Residential and Commercial Drainage Facilities.......................................................... 35 Table 10 Road Maintenance Problems in PAA.......................................................................... 37 Table 11 Road Maintenance Problems Near PAA..................................................................... 37 Table 12 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Cost for Surface Water Capital Improvements................................................................................................................40 Table 13 Street Inventory within P AA ................. ................... ............ .................... ........ ...........43 Table 14 Future LOS and Recommended Improvements .........................................................45 Table 15 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Cost for Roadway Improvements................................................................................................................47 Table 16 Operating Revenues Generated, by PAA (2003)........................................................56 Table 17 Operating Costs by Department by Potential Annexation Area (2003) .................... 57 Table 18 Annual Net Operating Revenues (or Operating Cost) of Annexation, by PAA (2003)................................................""""""""""""""""""""""""""".......................57 Table 19 Federal Way Potential Annexation'Area Capital Revenue to 2020.......................... 57 Table 20 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Estimated Future Capital Costs................ 58 Table 21 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Estimated Net Capital Revenues.............. 58 iii December 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan List of Maps Each Map follows after Page 72: Map I Federal Way PAA Map II Community Level Subarea Boundaries Map III Sensitive Areas Map IV Geologic Hazards Figure V 2002 Existing Land Use Distribution Map VI Parks & Cultural Resources Map VII-I Federal Way P AA Pre-Annexation Comprehenisve Plan Designations Map VII-2 Federal Way PAA Pre-Annexation Zoning Map Map VIII Surface Water Facilities Map IX Arterials and Local Streets Map X Existing Roadway Level of Service Map XI Year 2020 Roadway Level of Service Map XII 20 Year Proposed Intersection Improvements Map XIII Fire Department Facilities Map XIV Public School Facilities Map XV Water Service Map XVI Wastewater Service, Septic Repair and Complaints iv December 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 P.urpose of Subarea Plan The City of Federal Way Potential Annexation Area (P AA) was established through a series of interlocal agreements between the City of Federal Way and neighboring south King County cities. Based upon the State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) and King County Countywide Planning Policies, the City would ultimately annex and provide services within its designated P AA. While the City's Comprehensive Plan focuses upon plans and policies for property in the City limits, this Subarea Plan augments the Comprehensive Plan and addresses in more detail the Federal Way PAA, located principally to the east of I-5, with a small portion located west of 1-5 and north of the City limits near the Redondo neighborhood. Over time, property owners in the P AA have made annexation requests to the City of Federal Way, which requires a thorough City analysis of service/capital expenditures, revenues, and other issues. To review its P AA comprehensively and in advance of individual requests, the City of Federal Way, with the support of King County, initiated a PAA Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study of which this PAA Subarea Plan is a part. By evaluating the feasibility of potential annexations and planning for the future delivery of services, residents of the P AA and the City can make more informed choices about their future. Specific Subarea Plan purposes include: . To act as an informational resource for the City and County staff, elected officials, residents, property owners, and business owners; . To identify the PAA-specific goals, policies, pre-annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designations and capital plans; and . To provide the City with a framework to guide future annexations. In coordination with the City's overall Comprehensive Plan, this PAA Subarea Plan provides a Year 2020 long-range land use and policy plan to guide pre- annexation planning efforts and annexation requests. 1.2 P AA Location and General Characteristics The Federal Way PAA is located in South King County, and, with the exception of a small future annexation area near the intersection of South 272nd Street and Pacific Highway South (SR 99), lies generally east of the City of Federal Way and Interstate 5. The PAA is characterized by a series of residential neighborhoods focused around numerous lakes beginning with Star Lake at the north and concluding with Five Mile Lake at the South. See Maps I and II. December 2003 1.3 1.4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Subarea Plan Relationship to Other Elements The GMA requires that the City of Federal Way prepare a 20-year comprehensive plan that at a minimum addresses land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, transportation, economic development, and parks and recreation. Optionally, a city or county may choose to include subarea plans and/or other elements. GMA does not limit optional topics. Since its adoptiolfin 1995, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan has included policies identifying the need for comprehensive land planning in its designated P AA. The City's Comprehensive Plan was prepared in accordance with the GMA and underwent an extensive public participation process including City residents, property owners, and business owners as documented in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Introduction. The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan in its entirety contains ten elements: Land Use, Transportation, Economic Development, Housing, Capital Facilities, City Center, Potential Annexation Area, Natural Environment, and Private Utilities. The Consolidated Plan for Housing and Human Services, and the Parks Recreation and Cultural Services Plan are incorporated by reference. When adopted in final form, this P AA Subarea Plan will be a component of the overall Federal Way Comprehensive Plan focusing upon the 5,OOO-acre future annexation area, and will replace the Potential Annexation Area Element of the Comprehensive Plan currently in place. It is intended that the City's Comprehensive Plan Elements provide the general goals and policies for land use, transportation, economic development, etc. for the P AA as well as the City. However, the P AA Subarea Plan is intended to address unique characteristics or situations relevant to the P AA. Future annexation proposals will be evaluated, and, if approved, implemented in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, that will include the PAA Subarea Plan. Subarea Planning Process and Concepts This P AA Subarea Plan has been prepared in accordance with an established work program that included reviews by the City of Federal Way, King County, and two working committees. The work program has included public participation throughout the process. The key steps in this planning process include: . Inventory: The inventory identifies current environmental and public service conditions. See Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18, 2002. Analysis: Several analyses have been undertaken including land use and population review, levels of service (roads, surface water, police, etc.), and preliminary cost and revenue estimates. (Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11, 2003; Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Land U<;e Analysis Compilation, March 5, 2003.) . 2 December 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . Draft Plan: The March 2003 Drafì P AA Subarea Plan contained draft policies and plans, and was the basis for a fiscal analysis. Final Plan: Based on public input and the fiscal review of the Draft Plan, the Final Subarea Plan has been prepared. It is coordinated with the P AA Annexation Feasibility Study including strategic alternatives such as annexation area phasing and service provision phasing. . . t-dopted Plan: As part of the City's public hearing process, the Federal Way Planning Commission will review and makè a recommendation to the Federal Way City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee (LUTe) regarding the adoption of the Subarea Plan. The LUTC will review the Subarea Plan and the Planning Commission recommendation and issue a recommendation to the Federal Way City Council regarding the adoption of the Subarea Plan. The City Council will review the Subarea Plan and the Planning Commission and LUTC recommendations in its consideration of adopting the Subarea Plan. As the PAA Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study have progressed to date, key concepts have been elicited about the P AA: . The City of Federal Way recognizes annexation as a citizen-based process. The Federal Way PAA Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study are intended to provide for advanced planning of the PAA allowing both citizens and the City to make informed choices about their future. The PAA is part of the larger Federal Way community, but is distinct in its own right. Given its proximity, inter-dependent transportation network, shared school district/utility districts/emergency service providers, and the City's subregional economic role, the P AA is inter-related with the City of Federal Way. However, the PAA has its own unique characteristics- residential neighborhood variety, natural features including headwaters to several significant streams, a road system functioning with rural standards in an urbanizing area, some economic nodes such as in Redondo, and many other distinct features. . 1.5 Public Input Process Key to the development of the PAA Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study has been and will be public participation. Public participation methods for the P AA Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study have included: . Articles for inclusion in City and Utility District newsletters, and City and County website pages sites (www.cityoffederalway.com; www.metrokc.gov, respectively), as well as a link from the Federal Way School District website page to City and County website. December 2003 3 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . Creation ofa PAA Study webpage on the City's website that provides an opportunity for residents, property owners, and business owners to view draft and final work products, provide comments and suggestions, as well as other features. . Coordination of draft work products with neighboring jurisdictions and . - affected agencies. . City facilitation of public neighborhood meetings with the North Lake, Lake Kilarney, and Lake Geneva Homeowner's Associations to explain the purposes of the P AA Study and its scope of work. . City-issued press releases announcing the publication of draft work products and the hosting of public meetings. . The maintenance of a comprehensive stakeholder list that is used for mailing public meeting announcements and the announcement of the issuance of recently issued draft work products. . The mailing of the City's quarterly newsletter to each PAA household. Each newsletter provides an update regarding the status of the P AA study and the announcement of recently issued draft work products. Announcement of the publication of draft work products and hosting of public meetings on the City's public access television station. P AA Steering Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council regular meetings open to the public. To date, Steering Committee Meetings have been held in December 2001, January and February 2002, and January and April 2003, and more are planned. Planning Commission and City Council meetings are forthcoming. . . . Public open houses where residents, property owners, and business owners can review information of interest relevant to their neighborhood, and talk individually with officials and staff. To date public open houses have been held in February 2002, and January and September 2003. Meetings were held at local public schools in the P AA and at the City of Federal Way City Hall. At the meetings, the public could review the PAA inventory, land use concepts, levels of service and fiscal analyses as well as provide comments and ask questions. Later in the process, public hearings before the Plamling Commission and/or City Council to present formal testimony, including written comments in advance of the public hearings. . A Steering Committee was formed to act as a "sounding board" reviewing products of the Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study, and assessing the direction of the project, particularly the Subarea Plan. The P AA Steering Committee consists of officials from the Federal Way City Council, Planning Commission, School District, Chamber of Commerce, King County, Lakehaven Utility District, and P AA Resident representatives. December 2003 4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan A Staff Work Group comprised of City staff from multiple departments, a County staff representative, Utility District representatives, and Fire District staff provided technical review of PAA Subarea Plan products and furnished data and information to the Subarea Plan preparation team. 2 POLICY BACKGROUND 2.1 statewide Planning Goals The GMA contains 13 statewide planning goals addressing: . Urban growth . Natural resource industries . Reduce sprawl . Open space and recreation . Transportation . Environment . Housing . Citizen participation and . Economic development coordina tion Property rights . Public facilities and services . . Historic preservation . Permits While all have been considered in the Subarea Planning process, three in particular are most relevant to P AA planning efforts: . Urban growth - Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist, or can be provided in an efficient manner. Reduce sprawl - Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development. Public facilities and services - Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use, without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. In terms of urban growth and reduction of sprawl, the P AA contains primarily single-family development, with a few commercial nodes along major arterial roadways, where services are or can be extended, identified as neighborhood or community centers. The land use/zoning pattern based on the Pre-Annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations would result in urban densities of about 4 units per net acre or greater, meeting GMA goals for urban level growth. Select areas have Pre-Annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designations to accommodate approximately I residential unit per acre on the periphery of the . . December 2003 5 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan P AA, due to sensitive areas and infrastmcture limitations. The ability of the City and Special Districts to provide public facilities and services to the P AA is another key topic of this Subarea Plan. The principles contained in the Subarea Plan are to meet community service and infrastmcture needs cõncurrent with growth, to conduct additional capital planning in areas where data gaps have been found (e.g. surface water), and to provide public services in a cost-efficient manner recognizing the historic level of service differences between the City and the County.- 2.2 Countywide Planning Policies In King County, the Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP's) that were enacted pursuant to the GMA also provide guidance with regard to multi-jurisdictional joint planning, annexation, and the phasing of urban development. The most applicable policies are: LU28 LU29 LU30 Within the Urban Growth Area, growth should be directed as follows: a) first, to centers and urbanized areas with existing infrastmcture capacity; b) second, to areas which are already urbanized such that infrastmcture improvements can be easily extended; and c) last, to areas requiring major infrastmcture improvements. All jurisdictions shall develop growth phasing plans consistent with applicable capital facilities plans to maintain an urban area served with adequate public facilities and services to maintain an urban area to meet at least the six year intermediate household and employment target ranges consistent with LU67 and LU68. These growth phasing plans shall be based on locally adopted definitions, service levels, and financing commitments, consistent with State GMA requirements. The phasing for cities shall not extend beyond their Potential Annexation Areas. Interlocal agreements shall be developed that specify the applicable minimum zoning, development standards, impact mitigation, and future annexation for the Potential Annexation Areas. Where urban services cannot be provided within the next 10 years, jurisdictions should develop policies and regulations to: a. Phase and limit development such that planning, siting, densities, and infrastmcture decisions will support future urban development when urban services become available. b. Establish a process for converting land to urban densities and uses once services are available. December 2003 6 FW13 LU31 LU32 LU33 LU34 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Cities are the appropriate provider of local urban services to urban areas, either directly or by contract. Counties are the appropriate provider of most countywide services. Urban services shall not be extended through the use of special purpose districts without the approval of the city in whose potential annexation area the extension is proposed. Within the urban area, as time and conditions warrant, cities should assume local urban services provided by special purpose districts. In collaboration with adjacent counties, cities, and King County, and in consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area shall be specific to each city. Potential annexation areas shall not overlap. Within the potential annexation area, the city shall adopt criteria for annexation, including conformance with Countywide Planning Policies, and a schedule for providing urban services and facilities within the potential annexation area. This process shall ensure that unincorporated urban islands of King County are not created between cities and strive to eliminate existing islands between cities. A city may annex territory only within its designated potential annexation area. All cities shall phase annexations to coincide with the ability for the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to be annexed. Land within a city's potential annexation area shall be developed according to that city's and King County's growth phasing plans. Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services. Subsequent to establishing a potential annexation area, in-fill lands within the potential annexation area that are not adjacent, or not practical to annex, shall be developed pursuant to interlocal agreements between the County and the affected city. The interlocal agreement shall establish the type of development allowed in the potential annexation area and standards for that development so that the area is developed in a manner consistent with its future annexation potential. The interlocal agreement shall specify, at a minimum, the applicable zoning, development standards, impact mitigation, and future annexation within the potential annexation area. Several unincorporated areas are currently considering local governance options. Unincorporated urban areas that are already urbanized and are within a city's potential annexation area are encouraged to annex to that city in order to receive urban services. Where annexation is inappropriate, incorporation may be considered. The CWPP's are particularly reflected in Subarea Plan sections 12 and 15, Public Services and Capital Facilities, and Annexation. December 2003 7 2.3 2.4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan City Planning Goals or Policies The Land Use Element of a Comprehensive Plan plays a central role in guiding and directing all other Elements by indicating the desired land use pattern that consequently drives the demand for infrastructure and services. The key City Planning Goals are based then on the City's Land Use Concept in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (see Federal Way Land Use Element, Map II-2). In summary, the City of Federal Way land use conceptis based upon creating land use patterns that support multiple modes of transportation, with attention to neighborhood enhancements and protection, and community amenities and needs (design quality; parks; etc.) to ensure compatible land uses. These concepts include the transfonnation of the City's retail core into a dense, mixed use City Center, preservation of residential neighborhoods, a hierarchy of mixed-use retail and employment nodes to serve the community, and development that recognizes environmentally sensitive areas. The P AA, as part of the larger Federal Way community, is reviewed in this Land Use Concept framework while also reviewed with respect to unique P AA circumstances. Consistency of Subarea Plan with Key State, Countywide, and Local Planning Goals This Subarea Plan has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Washington State GMA, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan to ensure coordinated planning. In summary, the Subarea Plan is consistent with the following State, Regional, and City "indicator" policies: . Growth Management Act: The Subarea Plan applies urban densities to accommodate growth, avoid sprawl, and provide services efficiently within the Urban Growth Area. As described in Section 6, the predominant land classification would support urban level densities except in areas with significant environmental or infrastructure limitations. Public service capital and operational needs and improvements are identified to support the P AA land use plans. . Countywide Planning Policies: The land capacity of the P AA would accommodate the P AA housing target of ] ,320 units and employment target of 134 between 200 I and 2022, described further under Section 6.2. Public service capital and operational needs and improvements are identified to support the P AA land use plans. The phasing of services and annexation areas is encouraged in Subarea Plan policies. . City Policies: Subarea Plan designations and policies support the Comprehensive Plan such as the hierarchy of Commercial Centers by providing for local-serving commercial and mixed-use nodes, and by supporting the predominant residential character of the P AA. 8 December 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 3 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA 3.1 Federal Way P AA Boundary Federal Way Adoption of P AA Boundary Process The City of Federal Way formally began the process of evaluating its logical service delivery areas and the boundaries of its P AA with the publication of a July 1991 issue paper. This paper examined the requirements of GMA as they relate to UGA's, and included a discussion of how urban services were being provided. The paper also described special purpose district boundaries, the transportation system, parks and recreation facilities, and physical features that potentially affect urban service delivery. The analysis that was included in the 1991 issue paper provided the basis for a proposed P AA area for the City. Staff presented the issue paper and proposed Urban Growth Boundary to the Federal Way Planning Commission. The Commission reviewed the proposal and held a public hearing. Most of the testimony received by the Commission was supportive of the proposed urban growth boundary. The Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed P AA boundary. The City Council accepted the recommendation, but did not adopt it. Rather, the Council directed staff to begin negotiations with the neighboring cities of Auburn, Milton, Algona, Pacific, Des Moines, and Kent, all of whom had developed urban growth boundaries that overlapped with Federal Way's proposal. The City negotiated with each of its municipal neighbors for the better part of a year. By the Fall of 1993, staff presented a revised P AA boundary to the City Council. The Council reviewed the proposal and adopted the P AA boundary on December 21, 1993. That boundary was amended in 1994. The City executed interlocal agreements with all of the neighboring cities based on the boundary shown on Map/. Neighborhood Analysis Levels For purposes of data collection efficiencies and resources, the P AA has been divided into three Major Subareas as well as seven smaller Community Level Subareas. The Major and Community Level Subareas are as follows (see Map 11): . The Redondo East Community Level Subarea is in the Redondo East Major Subarea (both with identical boundaries), west ofl-5 and is approximately 43 acres in size. . Star Lake, Camelot, and North Lake Community Level Subareas comprise the Northeast Major Subarea, east of I-5 and north of SR-18, and total approximately 2,527 acres in size. December 2003 9 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . Lakeland, Parkway, and Jovita Community Level Subareas comprise the Southeast Major Subarea, east ofI-5 and south of SR- I 8, and total approximately 2,470 acres in size. The Community Level Subarea Boundaries are shown on Map II. The subarea boundaries are based upon City-defined Transportation Analysis Zones which align with Census Tract geography, neighborhood affinities as expressed in prior County planning efforts, and the ability of the County to provide information within existing resources, as well as input from the P AA Steering Committee in December 200 I. 3.2 Accomplishments since 1991 Issue Paper The following has been accomplished since completion of the 1991 Issue Paper: . Used technical information from neighboring jurisdictions and information from affected citizens to identify and establish a P AA boundary for the City of Federal Way. . Established an interlocal agreement on mutually agreeable P AA boundaries with the following South King County Cities: Des Moines, Kent, Auburn, Algona, Pacific, and Milton. . Completed a preliminary analysis of the P AA that identified potential issues associated with annexation and a scope of work for a more comprehensive study of the PAA. . Initiated a comprehensive study of the P AA in conjunction with King County. The comprehensive study of the P AA includes several phases as described above: inventory, analysis, draft and final plan formulation, etc. The Federal Way PAA Inventory (March 18, 2002) addresses a range of environmental, economic, and social conditions within the Federal Way PAA. The Inventory is primarily a compilation of readily available data from King County, Special Districts, and the City of Federal Way, and was supplemented with some limited field review. The purpose of the Inventory was to serve as a basis for additional planning and analysis 0 f the P AA including levels of services, current and future fiscal conditions, and subarea planning. The P AA Inventory was followed by a series of reports about levels of service (LOS) in the PAA (Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11, 2003). The LOS reports address a wide range of governmental services including community development, human services, parks/recreation, police services, roads, surface water, solid waste, water and wastewater. However, the LOS reports focus upon surface water and transportation in more detail due to the complexity and importance of these services to the community and the City. Also completed was a series of land use classification and policy December 2003 10 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan analyses analyzing current and proposed land use patterns and policy issues. These recent P AA inventories and analyses are summarized and integrated as appropriate into this Subarea Plan. Additional phases addressing costs and revenues and annexation strategies in the Annexation Feasihility Study, Decemher 2()(J3, have also been integrated with this PAA Subarea Plan. 4 Feasibility Analysis 4.1 Annexation Feasibility Analysis Purpose An Annexation Feasibility Study (December 2003) has been prepared to estimate the long-term fiscal impact annexation would have on the City of Federal Way. This section provides information on the basic assumptions and methodology of the analysis. The results of the Feasibility Analysis are reviewed in the appropriate topical section of this P AA Subarea Plan (e.g. transportation, surface water, parks and recreation), but are summarized in total in Section 12. As a baseline assessment, the Feasibility Study looks at the net fiscal gap the new, expanded City of Federal Way would face if the City were to annex any of the identified P AAs while trying to maintain current levels of services and current levels of taxation and fees. To account for the differences between the fiscal impacts associated with the day- to-day operation of the City and the impacts associated with needed capital investments, the Feasibility Study takes a three-pronged approach to assessing impacts: 1. Estimate the incremental operating costs introduced by annexation of the P AAs on an annual basis, and compare those costs to the incremental revenues the City would receive from the same areas. 2. Discuss how the balance of operating costs and revenues would be likely to change in future years. 3. Estimate the additional capital investments that the City would take on with annexation and compare those costs to the additional capital revenues the City could expect to receive from the P AAs. To provide the most intuitive and up-to-date information about estimated impacts, this analysis provides a snapshot of what the operating impacts would be if the City were in the position of fully governing each P AA in 2003. The assessment of operating impacts is based on 2003 costs of service and 2003 tax and fee structures, as outlined in the City of Federal Way 2003/2004 Adopted Budget, and is intended to represent a picture of fiscal impacts under steady-state operation. In essence, these estimated steady-state operating impacts reflect the ongoing "costs" December 2003 11 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan that the City would face each year, beginning perhaps, in the third year after annexation and extending into perpetuity.' Estimated costs of capital improvements are based on the most recent available data (2002) and reflect estimates of the combined investments that will be necessaty through the planning horizon of 2020 (all presented in 2002 dollars). There is no material effect on this fiscal analysis from using 2003 operating costs impacts and 2002 capital costs, primarily because the capital improvement costs are expressed in current (2002) dollars regardless of when the projects may be built in the next 20 years. The purpose 0 f estimating the hypothetical gap that would be created if the City were to try to extend current service levels to the P AAs without increasing taxes is to present decision makers and the public with a picture of the true "cost" of annexation. Ultimately, any such gap between costs and revenues is hypothetical. Cities have no choice but to cover their costs of operation. Consequently, if Federal Way were to annex any of the P AAs, any estimated "cost" associated with annexation would have to be made up through some combination of (1) stretching City resources through decreased levels of service and/or (2) increasing City revenues. The Feasibility Study Implementation Strategies are integrated into the Subarea Plan Section 12, and examine a variety of options to improve the financial feasibility of future annexations. The Feasibility Study provides fiscal analysis and annexation strategies that are integrated into the Federal Way PAA Subarea Plan, particularly in terms of: . Identifying public services and capital improvements that would need to be in place to serve the Subarea Plan current and future land use pattern over time, and Incorporating into Subarea Plan policies the strategies regarding agency coordination, funding sources, future land use amendments, levels of service, and others, that could improve the financial feasibility of annexations in the PAA. . I In the initial years of annexation costs could be either higher or lower than the estimated steady- state impacts, depending on how the City chose to manage annexation. Among the detenninants of transition-period costs will be the direct and indirect costs of managing the transition and the pace at which the City chooses to ramp up certain, discretionary service levels in the annexed area. December 2003 12 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan 4.2 study Area Population Population data for the Annexation Feasibility Study covers several time periods. The data is consistent among time periods, but different periods are used in order to produce the most accurate forecast of operating and capital costs and revenues. Baseline data was developed from the last US Census and other sources that used the US Census. This enabled the study to start from a reliable base of data for the year 2000. The Operating Cost/Revenue analysis is a snapshot in time based on the City's 2003 budget and rates, with some trend analysis. As a result, population forecasts for 2003 were prepared for use in the analysis of operations. The Capital Cost/Revenue analysis covers the period 2002 through 2020 in order to provide a long-range forecast similar to other long-range planning strategies for capital. The data to support the capital improvements analysis is based on the City's PAA market population and employment forecast from 2000 to 2020. Table 1 shows the population and housing units for each Major Subarea and the total P AA for the years 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2020. The area included in this fiscal analysis comprises a substantial population equal to approximately 25 percent of the 2002 population of the current City of Federal Way (83,850,2002). Table 1. Year 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2020 Population and Housing 2000 2000 2002 2002 2003 2003 2020 2020 Subarea Population Housing Population Housing Population Housing Population Housing Units Units Units Units (Total) Redondo 260 150 260 150 260 150 388 204 East Northeast 11,600 3,900 11 ,900 4,015 12,300 4,130 15,870 5,705 Subarea Southeast 8,700 3,200 8,800 3,307 8,900 3,340 9,761 3,564 Subarea PAA Total 20,560 7,250 20,960 7,472 21 ,460 7,620 26,019 9,473 Source: 2000 U S Census, and King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning, January 2002; ECONorthwest 2002 and 2003 December 2003 13 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 4.3 Feasibility Study Methodology Cost and Revenue Forecasts There are many ways to forecast costs and revenues associated with annexation. Examples include per capita analysis or estimates that are based on the experiences of a handful of so-called "comparable" cities. The City of Federal Way desired an analysis with a high degree of reliability; therefore the Study Approach to evaluating the fiscal impacts of annexation is based on a more detailed analysis of the fundamental characteristics of the three Major P AA Subareas and comparisons of those characteristics with the defining characteristics of the existing City of Federal Way. The Feasibility Study analysis looks at the fundamental drivers of demand for City services within the existing boundaries of Federal Way, and based on a comparison of similar drivers in the three P AAs, estimates the additional demand for each service that would be introduced by annexation of each area. In the case of law enforcement, for example, a typical assessment of service costs might be based on figures like average-cost-per-resident or the cost associated with extending police services in a manner that would maintain the City's current count of officers-per-thousand-residents. While each of these measures is attractive due to their ease of use, neither measure does a particularly good job of capturing the true demand for police services. To account for the unique characteristics of the PAA Major Subareas (and to account for the many differences between the P AAs and the existing City of Federal Way) the Feasibility Study estimates of the demand drivers for police services take into account, first, differences in the level of commercial activity among each of the areas, and second, the different characteristics of each area's residential base. Among households in each of the P AAs, the Study estimate of police demand distinguishes between the typical demand characteristics associated with five different combinations of housing type and tenure: (I) owner-occupied single- family homes; (2) renter-occupied single-family; (3) owner-occupied multifamily; (4) renter-occupied multifamily; and (5) mobile homes. The estimates of the relative contribution of each of these segments of the residential base to police demand is based on a series of statistical analyses of more than 100 cities across Washington State. Other examples of drivers used in this study include: land area (solid waste and surface water services), signals/street lights/road miles/population (traffic and road maintenance services) as well as several others. Feasibility Study Assumptions The Feasibility Study analysis is based on five assumptions: December 2003 14 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . Redondo East, Northeast and Southeast P AAs would receive levels of service similar to those now provided by the City of Federal Way. The current level of service, staffing and expenditures in Federal Way is the benchmark for forecasting comparable levels of service, staffing and costs in the P AA. . . Cities that have undertaken annexations in the past have found that there is a surge in demand for services after annexation. The Study methodology of "drivers" and "outputs" produces a more accurate forecast than a simple population-driven forecast, but it may not fully capture the increment of increased demand during the first few months after annexation. The fiscal analysis includes cost and revenue estimates only for those taxes or services that would change upon annexation. The local services that would not change include water and sewer, fire/EMS, schools, regional transit, health services, and regional parks. In other words, after annexation existing school and fire district boundaries will remain as they are, and regional transit, health and regional parks will continue to be provided by King County. . . The Feasibility Study projections ofrevenues and costs for determining fiscal analysis are conservative. This means that when a forecast includes judgment as well as data, the Study selected lower alternatives for revenues and higher alternatives for costs. Again Feasibility Study results are integrated throughout the Subarea Plan by relevant topic, but are fully summarized in Section 12. 5 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Environmentally sensitive areas in the P AA include wetlands, streams and lakes, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, and geologic hazard areas. The March 18, 2002, P AA Inventory Report provides a detailed inventory and description of these critical areas. Many of these areas have already been identified, delineated, mapped, and classified. In addition, the Inventory Report details the implications of Federal, State, and local policies regarding environmentally sensitive areas pending any potential future annexation. 5.1 Summary of Inventory The Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), Washington State Priority Habitat and Species Program (PHS), and the State Growth Management Act (GMA) provide levels of protection for endangered, threatened, or sensitive species and habitats, and hazard protection. Please refer to Maps III and IV for locations of sensitive and hazard areas within the P AA. A brief description of the results from December 2003 15 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan research on the environment is provided below. Wetlands There are approximately 440 acres of wetlands in the P AA, with the largest acreage of wetlands found in the Northeast Subarea. Within the smaller individual Community Subareas, Lakeland has the largest acreage of wetlands. See Map III. Both the County and City have regulations protecting wetlands with buffers and other requirements varying by wetland class. streams A distinctive characteristic of the P AA is that most of the area is a headwater to several major streams (Hylebos Creek, Mullen Slough, and Mill Creek). Most of the streams in the Federal Way PAA are classified by the County as Class 2 with salmonids requiring a 100 foot buffer. If using the City of Federal Way classification system, most streams would be considered Major Streams, also requiring a 100- foot buffer. Lakes Lakes in the PAA include Star, Dollof, North, Killamey, Geneva, and Five Mile lakes. The City of Federal Way Code has defined specific wetlands within the City as the Regulated Lakes. i.e. those located in the City and contained in King County Wetlands Inventory Notebook Volume 3, South. Upon annexation of areas containing lakes, the City would designate specific lakes within the P AA as Regulated Lakes. The setback requirement for Regulated Lakes is 25-feet landward in every direction from the ordinary high water mark of the lake. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Based on the State Priority Species and Habitat Mapping Program, within the P AA there are three anadromous running streams. These include the headwaters of West Hylebos creek, the south draining stream from Lake Dolloff and East Hylebos Creek south of Lake Kilamey. King County has also identified downstream and west of I-5 in the City limits that Hylebos Creek has a "Chinook distribution 500 foot buffer." The City definition of fish and wildlife areas is found in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC 18-28 and 22-1). The Federal Endangered Species Act listings of two fish, Chinook and bulltrout, as threatened are resulting in reassessments of County and City policies and permitting procedures. Interim ESA approaches in the King County permit process include use of existing regulatory tools with greater emphasis on application and enforcement as well as the adoption of more stringent Comprehensive Plan policies. The City of Federal Way requires all project applicants to fill out an "ESA Listed Salmonids Checklist," primarily using the SEP A process to determine mitigation required beyond code requirements. December 2003 16 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Aquifer Recharge Areas King County has mapped low, medium, and high potential groundwater contamination areas in the P AA and has adopted numerous regulations addressing critical aquifer recharge areas. These regulations address on-site sewage disposal systems, clearing restrictions, and through some overlay districts restrict certain land uses. The County is also in the process of preparing a Groundwater Management Program, which is slated to produce a Groundwater Management Plan for South King County, including Federal Way and its PAA. It is expected that this plan will include a work program to guide future actions and will establish a groundwater protection committee to guide its implementation. The Lakehaven Utility District's main source of water is from four aquifer systems that underlie the City: the Redondo-Milton Channel Aquifer, the Mirror Lake Aquifer, the Federal Way Deep Aquifer, and the Eastern Upland Aquifer. The locations of wells in relationship to the aquifer systems are shown on Map Ill. Aquifer recharge areas are located in areas where permeable soil and rock materials are relatively close to the land surface and where there is an excess of water from precipitation. The Lakehaven Utility District notes that the precise extent of the aquifer recharge areas is uncertain. Highline Water District services a small part of the P AA in the Star Lake area. Until 1962, all water came from the Highline District's wells. Today, about 90 percent of the water supply of the District is purchased from Seattle Public Utilities. The District supplements its Seattle water source with local wells. The wells, which draw from an intermediate aquifer approximately 400 feet underground, were designed to furnish approximately 15 percent of the total volume of water supplied by the District. The District has wells located in Des Moines and also near Angle Lake outside of the PAA and Federal Way. As defined in the City of Federal Way, Sensitive Area Ordinance, siting criteria for wells must comply with State law. Futhermore, any improvement or use on a subject property is subject to State requirements regarding separation of wells from sources of pollution. Frequently Flooded Areas There are no Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)-recognized frequently flooded areas in the City of Federal Way. There is a lOa-year floodplain located around Lake Dolloff in the P AA (See Map III). King County regulations require that development activities including fill may not cause the base flood elevation to rise. Federal Way has similar floodplain regulations in its Surface and Stormwater Management Code, Chapter 21 of the Federal Way City Code. Geologic Hazard Areas There are small portions of the Parkway, Jovita, and North Lake Subareas, which December 2003 17 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan have Landslide Hazard Areas and Erosion Hazard Areas, mostly located near streams or steep slope areas. There are also small portions of the Camelot and Lakeland Subareas that have erosion hazard areas. The Star Lake Subarea has a significant proportion of both Landslide Hazard and Erosion Hazard areas along its eastern border. Please refer to Map IV. 5.2 Environmental Goals and Policies - The following environmental goal and policies are provided to address P AA environmental conditions. Environmental Goal Practice environmental stewardship by protecting, enhancing and promoting the natural environment in and around the P AA. Environmental Policies P AA Env - 1 Prior to and upon annexation, the County and City in partnership shall promote the protection of P AA wetland and lake complexes, as much of the area is a headwater to significant fish-bearing streams, including Hylebos Creek, Mullen Slough, and Mill Creek. P AA Env - 2 The County shall, prior to annexation, manage the 100-year floodplain of Lake Dolloff in accordance with Federal, State, and County laws and guidelines. Regulations to prevent reductions in base flood storage volumes should continue to be implemented. Upon annexation, the City shall continue the policy and practice of floodplain management. P AA Env - 3 Prior to and upon annexation, the County and City in partnership should encourage the establishment of an active lake management system to monitor and manage lake water quality. This management system should actively involve property owners, homeowner's associations, lake management districts, and agency stormwater utilities within the P AA. P AA Env - 4 Prior to the annexation of large areas, updated surface water basin management plans should be prepared by the County in conjunction with the City for the PAA basins and sub-basins, particularly east ofI-5. Basins and sub-basins should be prioritized for study and coordinated with all appropriate State and local agencies. The topology, soils, drainage, flow and channel monitoring, vegetation, habitat identification, utilities, RID maintenance, and mitigation policies should be uniquely identified and defined for each basin/sub- basin. . P AA Env-5 In preparation of applying City Environmentally Sensitive Area regulations in the future, the City and County should inventory and map steep slope areas in the P AA. December 2003 18 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan P AA Env-6 Prior to and upon annexation, the City should coordinate with the King County Solid Waste Division regarding the environmental monitoring of the closed Puyallup/Kit Corner Landfill. P AA Env - 7 The City shall coordinate with King County through interlocal agreements or other means to institute common environmental protection standards while the area is in transition from County to City jurisdiction. Standards would include, but are not limited to, wetland buffers and mitigation standards, stream buffers, geologically hazardous area disturbance avoidance and buffers, and others as appropriate. 6 LAN D USE 6.1 Existing Land Uses With the exception of the Redondo East neighborhood, which lies along Pacific Highway South and contains a higher percent ofland devoted to multifamily or commercial uses, the Federal Way PAA contains primarily single family residential land uses as shown in Figure 5, and in Table 2. Of any neighborhood, the Parkway neighborhood has the most acres in multiple family uses although still primarily containing single family uses. Table 2. Existing Land Use by Parcels CATEGORY Redondo East Star Lake Camelot North Lake Lakeland Parkway Jovita Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Agriculture 0.0 0% 5.5 1% 0.0 0% 1.3 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Commercial 4.8 11% 12.2 1% 7.2 1% 0.9 0% 47.0 3% 1.1 0% 0.0 0% Easements 0.0 0% 6.0 1% 12.3 1% 0.1 0% 6.8 1% 2.8 0% 0.0 0% Industrial 1.9 4% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 10.5 1% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% No Data 0.0 0% 1.1 0% 12.1 1% 0.0 0% 0.7 0% 0.0 1% 0.3 0% Office 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.2 0% 2.3 1% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Open Space, 0.2 1% 27.7 3% 35.8 3% 1.8 0% 7.7 1% 56.9 9% 0.1 0% Common Areas & Drainage Public Park 0.0 0% 16.7 2% 18.4 1% 0.0 0% 64.7 5% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Quasi-Public 0.0 0% 46.0 5% 49.5 4% 0.0 0% 24.3 2% 0.0 æ-;, 0.0 0% Recreation 4.4 10% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Residential, 9.3 21% 6.2 0% 53.4 4% 1.4 0% 30.1 2% 82.8 (1% 3.9 0% Multi-Family Residential, 6.9 16% 412.3 50% 702.6 54% 140.6 37% 643.0 47% 271.9 41% 217.3 49% Single-Family Rights-of-Way 7.0 16% 105.3 13% 190.6 15% 57.7 15% 179.2 13% 128.7 19% 56.8 13% Utilities 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 30.6 5% 0.0 0% December 2003 19 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Redondo East Star Lake Camelot North Lake Lakeland Parkway Jovita CATEGORY Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Vacant 8.8 20% 165.7 20% 202.0 15% 126.5 33% 295.9 22% 87.1 13% 167.1 37% Water 0.0 0% 33.6 4% 20.7 1% 51.9 13% 52.6 4% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% TOTAL 43.3 100% 838.3 100% 1304.8 100% 384.5 100% 1362.5 100% 661. 9 100% 445.5 100% Notes: The acre figures are derived from the Arclnfo Geographic Infonnation System (GIS). Multi family includes triplex, fourplex, apartments, condominiums and group homes. No Data is used for parcels where King County parcel infonnation was unavailable. Easements include transportation and utility. Not all right of way (ROW) is developed. Source: King County Department of Assessments 200 I and City of Federal Way GIS Division, 2002 While the predominant land use in the P AA neighborhoods is residential, there are several businesses including the following types: . Redondo - Convenience stores, taverns, fast food, auto service and repair, personal services, offices, manufacturing, vehicle storage, and others . Star Lake - Tavern, nursery Camelot - Gas stations, offices North Lake - Nursery, gas station . . . Lakeland - Convenience store, espresso, auto repair, day care center Parkway - Auto salvage and towing. P AA Generally - Numerous home occupations (for example, home day care operations, individual construction contractors, home-based professional services, and others). . . During the years 2000 and 2001, King County processed a variety of land use and building permits, including preliminary plats containing approximately 576 lots, as well as multifamily developments totaling about 605 units. The majority of the preliminary plat lots were located in the Star Lake and Lakeland Neighborhoods, and the majority of the multi-family units permitted were located in the North Lake and Star Lake Neighborhoods. Residential development has continued since the compilation of County data in 2000 and 2001. Essential Public Facilities RCW 36.70A.200 states that essential public facilities are "those facilities that are typically difficult to site, such as: . Airports, . State education facilities State or regional transportation facilities as defined in RCW 47.06.140, . . State and local correctional facilities, Solid waste handling facilities, . December 2003 20 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . In-patient facilities including substance facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and Secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW 71.09.020." . Essential public facilities can be government owned and operated facilities, or privately owned facilities that are regulated by public entities. This definition is not considered to be all- inclusive, but provides examples of facilities that are difficult to site. No local comprehensive plan or development regulation may preclude the siting of essential public facilities. The P AA contains several essential public facilities including highways of statewide significance such as 1-5 and SR-18, a WSDOT maintenance facility, the closed & monitored Puyallup/Kit Corner Landfill (see section 12.1, Solid Waste), group homes, and potentially others that remain to be identified beyond present inventory efforts. Under County or City plans and rules, essential public facilities are required to undergo a review process for siting them. Cultural Resources The King County Historic Preservation Program has identified historic properties included in the King County Historic Resource Inventory. Th~ only designated or potentially eligible historic landmarks are in the Lake1and neighborhood of the Southeast Subarea (see Map VI). The Sutherland Grocery and Gas Station, built in the 1930's, was designated a King County Landmark in 2002. The two other potentially eligible historic sites are the Westborg House, a farmhouse built in 1905 by M. Westborg on property originally part of a 160-acre homestead owned by James Duncan, and the Fancher House, a home and barn built in 1923. The King County Historic Preservation Program recommends an inventory update to identify any additional historic properties in the P AA area as well as the City limits since the last inventory was conducted 15 years ago. Additionally, the County recommends an interlocal agreement for preservation services to provide a mechanism and incentives for protecting significant historic properties within the current and future annexed city boundaries. 6.2 Land Use Plan The predominant character of the P AA consists of single- family residential with several nodes of commercial and multifamily uses, principally along arterial roadways. The King County land use' plans governing the P AA have generally recognized this character. For the Federal Way PAA Subarea Plan, the base or starting point for developing a comprehensive land use plan was first to match the most similar City classification to the current County classification. Although the basis of the PAA Subarea Plan is the King County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the City conducted a detailed review of existing land uses and future land use/zoning classifications to determine if adjustments to the basic land December 2003 21 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan classification system were warranted in certain locations of the P AA. Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis produced a series of maps to help identify: . Nonconfonning Uses: Existing uses that either under the King County classification/zoning system or the City potential classification/zoning system may be considered nonconforming - i.e. legally established land uses that do not conform to existing zoning regulations. Mobile Home Parks and Units: Mobile home parks and single manufactured homes that mayor may not meet Federal Way manufactured home park design standards. Parcel Size and Minimum Lot Size Requirements: Parcels smaller than the minimum lot size associated with potential zoning categories. . . Additionally, other issues and locations were reviewed, including: . King County R -1 Zoning areas were reviewed to determine if environmental characteristics warrant Federal Way equivalent zoning (RS- 35.0) to King County's R-l (one residential dwelling per acre) zoning. Potential Incompatibilities: The P AA Subarea Planning team reviewed sites where there could be a potential for incompatibility with City policies/codes, or other concerns. . The result of the land use and zoning analysis is a Land Use Plan that: . Recognizes and supports the predominant single- family suburban character of the P AA. . Recognizes the need for neighborhood or community level business goods and services at key nodes in the P AA such as at the intersection of arterials. Creates a consistent, compatible long-term land use pattern recognizing the predominant and unique character of P AA neighborhoods. . land Use Capacity Analysis The Federal Way PAA has an estimated Year 2003 population of21,460 with most of the population residing in the Northeast Subarea. The GMA and Countywide Planning Policies for King County require that King County and its cities accommodate their fair share of the future growth projected for King County. The PAA has been found to contain a large supply of vacant and underdeveloped land, with the capacity to accommodate significant future development (approximately 3,717 dwelling units as described further below). Future development "targets", expressed in the number of housing units, are determined through an interactive, multi-jurisdictional process between King County and cities located within, considering land capacity, market factors, and other parameters. Through this ongoing regional process, the P AA growth target for the years 2001 to 2022 is established at 1,320 units. The employment target is established at 134 jobs. The P AA land capacity yield can be compared with the December 2003 22 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan growth targets to help determine the ability of the land use plan to meet growth management obligations. As part of a countywide effort to prepare an analysis of buildable lands pursuant to GMA requirements, the County has estimated the capacity of vacant and underdeveloped (land not developed to full potential) lands in the P AA. Consistent with regionally established methods that are tailored to reflect King County conditions, the total vacant and underdeveloped acres were discounted for critical areas such as wetlands, streams, and steep slopes, rights-of-way and public purpose lands, and market factors (i.e. not all property owners would want to sell or develop). These acres were then multiplied by density factors based upon achieved densities in developed projects over the period 1995-2000. The results for the 20-year period of 2001 to 2022 are a potential dwelling capacity of 3,754 units and an employment capacity of 134 jobs calculated by King County. The City of Federal Way conducted a similar residential capacity analysis with results of 3,717 dwelling units, very close to the County's analysis since similar land use classifications are assumed. It should be noted that a capacity analysis may make adjustments or discounts to the amount of available land, but does not estimate the time or rate that growth will occur, only the capacity of the land for additional development. The market demand for homes and places of employment will in part determine the timing and rate of growth within the 20-year planning period for the P AA. To help identify potential market demands, the City conducted a market analysis for the P AA with the Puget Sound Regional Council forecasts as a starting point. The outcome of the market analysis is a year 2000 to year 2020 projection of2,223 dwelling units and 115 jobs, which for dwellings exceeds the P AA housing targets, and for employment approaches the employment target, in a nearly similar time horizon. For the purposes of capital facility planning the market analysis figures are used to ensure that facility planning efforts do no overestimate facility demand, capital needs, and funding requirements. The market analysis population growth to 2020 and the City level of service standards have been the basis for the capital needs projections in this Subarea Plan. The County or City plans need to accommodate and direct growth in its comprehensive plan, development regulations, and resource allocation decisions, but the achievement of the Subarea Plan land use plan and other policy objectives will be driven in large part by the private sector, including individual property owner decisions. It is the County and City role to provide opportunities and capacity to meet regional fair share growth, monitor growth, and respond to changing needs and circumstances as they arise through regular review of comprehensive plans, development regulations, and budgets. Comprehensive Plan land Use; relationship to Pre- Annexation Zoning As part of implementing the P AA Subarea Plan, the City has the option of December 2003 23 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan adopting a pre-annexation comprehensive plan and zoning map designations (RCW 35.13.177), which would become effective upon annexation. Pre- annexation comprehensive plan classification and zoning map designations could provide more certainty to property owners and residents about the future character of the area should they annex to the City. As part of the Federal Way PAA Subarea Planning Process, a more specific PAA Pre-Annexation Zoning Map shown in Map VII-2 has been prepared to correspond to the proposed P AA Pre- Annexation Comprehensive Plan in Map VII-i. The process of adopting a pre-annexation land use plan and pre-annexation zoning would follow these steps in accordance with RCW 35.13: After a proposed comprehensive plan or zoning regulation is prepared, the legislative body of the city must hold at least two public hearings on it. These hearings must be held at least 30 days apart. Notice of each hearing must be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the annexing city and in the area to be annexed. The notice must give the time and place of hearing. A copy of the ordinance or resolution adopting the proposed plan, any part of the proposed plan, or any amendment, together with any map referred to or adopted by the ordinance or resolution, must be filed with the county auditor and the city clerk. The ordinance, resolution, and map must be duly certified as a true copy by the clerk of the annexing city. The county auditor is to record the ordinance or resolution and keep the map on file. (Municipal Research & Services Center of Washington, Annexation Handbook, Revised December 200 1 - Report No. 19) The adopting ordinance for the pre-annexation plan and zoning should specify the time interval following an annexation during which the ordinance adopting the pre-annexation plan and zoning, must remain in effect before it may be amended, supplemented or modified by subsequent ordinance or resolution adopted by the annexing city or town. Any amendment to the pre-annexation land use plan that is adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan is subject to the general GMA limitation that the comprehensive plan may be amended no more frequently than once a year, unless exceptions are met. (Municipal Research & Services Center of Washington, Annexation Handbook, Revised December 2001 - Report No. 19) The Steering Committee has held public meetings in preparing the Subarea Plan. Planning Commission and City Council public hearings are planned as part of the remainder of the Subarea Plan process to fulfill local City public participation requirements and the requirements to ultimately establish a Pre-Annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designations. See Section 1.5. December 2003 24 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 6.3 Land Use Goals and Policies The P AA land use goal and policies are provided in this section, and address land use character and land use planning in the P AA. land Use Goal Respect the character, integrity, and unique qualities of P AA neighborhoods in land use planning efforts. land Use Policies General Policies P AA LV - 1 Proposed annexations should be implemented to be consistent with the pre-annexation land use plans and zoning of the Federal Way PAA Subarea Plan. (See Policy P AA Annex-4.) P AA LV - 2 City and County plans and regulations shall emphasize single- family detached dwellings as the primary use in the PAN s established single- family neighborhoods. P AA LV - 3 The City and County P AA commercial and multi-family land use patterns and regulations should meet community needs, respect the hierarchy of districts and centers in the Federal Way planning area, and support the Federal Way City Center. P AA LV - 4 The City and County P AA land use plan should provide sufficient zoned capacity, and a variety of housing types, to address total household growth targets for the P AA. P AA LV - 5 Areas with significant environmental hazards, unique or fragile ecosystems of high rank, order, and function, or long-term infrastructure limitations, may be further protected beyond the application of development regulations through Federal Way RS-35.0 zoning in the Star Lake, Jovita, and Parkway neighborhoods. P AA LV - 6 To promote financially self-supporting annexations, the City should support the County in facilitating or conducting coordinated master or sub- area planning of vacant, underdeveloped, or transitional land areas in the P AA that may present unique and/or highly visible sites for high tax generating land uses, such as but not limited to auto sales. Expedited or advanced environmental review, incentives to encourage assemblages of land, and/or coordinated and comprehensive approaches to site development and environmental protection should be considered. Cultural Resources Policy PAALV -7 Prior to and upon annexation, the City and County should December 2003 25 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan coordinate with the King County Historic Preservation Program, the Cultural Development Authority of King County, and local historical societies (such as the Historic Society of Federal Way) to promote the preservation of historic resources in the PAA. P AA LV-8 The City and/or County should conduct a P AA historic inventory update prior to or upon annexation. P AA LV-9 The City should consider mechanisms to offer historic preservation services{lnd incentives in the P AA upon the annexation of P AA properties into the City, including, but not limited to, an interlocal agreement with King County for resource evaluation and incentives. Economic Development Policies P AA LV - 10 Commercial locations, development standards, and permitted uses of City and County Comprehensive Plans and Zoning Regulations should reflect a hierarchy of business districts, recognizing the Federal Way City Center as the primary Citywide business center, and business districts in the P AA as secondary and tertiary nodes catering to local and/or neighborhood needs. P AA LV - 11 The City and County should support neighborhood level business retention, improvement, and development on commercially zoned properties to the east of 1-5 to meet the needs of local residents. P AA LV - 12 The City and County should promote the redevelopment and strengthening of viable commercial centers, such as in the Redondo East Community Subarea. P AA LV - 13 Commercial development should be encouraged on properties designated commercial on the P AA Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning maps to help meet the P AA employment target determined in the Countywide Planning Policies. Essential Public Facilities Policies The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element policies address essential public facilities. Additional policies are not proposed. 7 HOUSING 7.1 Summary of Inventory The Federal Way PAA has an estimated Year 2003 population of21,460 with the larger population residing in the Northeast Subarea. As of the Year 2000, a majority of the dwelling units are single-family (83 percent; 6,050 units) in the December 2003 26 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan P AA as a whole, and most dwellings are owner-occupied rather than rented except in Redondo East. Most of the single-family housing has typically been developed since 1960. However, there are pockets of older, well-maintained homes occupied by long- time area residents. The communities with the newest single-family housing stock i.Delude Red°!ldo East, Star Lake, and Parkway. Few single-family homes are considered to be in poor condition and most are considered average in all neighborhoods. Neighborhoods with the highest percent of homes rated "good" by the King County Assessor inelude Camelot, Jovita, and Lakeland. There are about 1,200 multifamily units in the P AA (17 percent of total Year 2000 units). PAA multifamily complexes (excluding mobile home parks) are described by the King County Assessor as average or low quality in condition. The King County Countywide Planning Policies commit the City and the County to ensuring there is capacity in their Comprehensive Plans to meet their assigned targets, which for the PAA equals 1,320 additional housing units. There is sufficient vacant and underdeveloped land in the P AA to accommodate this target without significant zoning changes. It should be noted, however, that the timing and rate of this growth would occur based upon market forces. In addition to apportioning general housing growth targets, the Countywide Planning Policies indicate that jurisdictions should promote affordable housing to low and very low income households, at 20-25 percent and 17 percent of the overall housing target respectively. In 1998, King County published a King County Market Rate AfJordability Study. A review of the housing stock affordability was conducted for the City of Federal Way, and all of Unincorporated King County. The results show that Federal Way and Unincorporated King County as a whole provide substantial percentages of affordable housing, both ownership and rental, particularly in relation to other King County locations. Housing sales information for the P AA would tend to support the Countywide study. Considering principal and interest (7 percent assumed) costs, most single-family homes would be affordable to households of Low-Median income level (80 percent), and some are affordable to Moderate Income households (60 percent). Relative to each other, the Jovita and Camelot neighborhoods are the most affordable, and the Star Lake and Redondo East neighborhoods are the least affordable. See Table 3. December 2003 27 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Table 3. P AA Housing Sales and Affordability Housing/Mortgage Characteristic Camelot North Star Jovita Lakeland Parkway Redondo Lake Lake East Median Sales Price for SF Sales* $162,500 $174,000 $245,000 $159,500 $203,000 $185,000 $214.900 Count of Transactions 466 35 259 70 186 264 10 200 I Average Assessed Value of Single Family Homes $152,443 $187,658 $187,301 $160,798 $189,162 $172,263 $212,029 Monthly Mortgage Payment for 95% $1,026.59 $1,099.25 $1,547.79 $1,007.64 $1,282.45 $1,168.74 $1,357.63 Median Sales Price: 7% interest** Annual Mortgage Costs for 95% Median $12,319.13 $13,190.94 $18,573.45 $12,091.70 $15,389.43 $14,024.85 $16,291.57 Sales Prices: 7% interest** Year 2002, income level at 80% of median $54,400 King County Income, Family of 4 Year 2002, income level at 60% of median $46,740 King County Income, Family of 4 80% of Median Income x 30% of Annual $16,320.00 Income, Family of 4 60% of Median Income x 30% of Annual $14,022.00 Income, Family of 4 Notes: *Includes recorded sales valued at $25,000 and above for the years 1999, 2000, and most of 200 I. ** Assumes Mortgage Payment Factors (principal and interest only) 30 year fixed, 7 percent interest. The inclusion of taxes and insurance, as well as a higher interest rate would raise monthly housing costs, but there appears to be a margin between the mortgage figures and affordable monthly housing costs, which would mean conclusions would generally stay the same when factoring in those other costs. Source: ECONorthwest, Inc.; Bucher, Willis & Ratliff; U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development As growth occurs, a key policy would be to help maintain the conditions allowing for housing affordable to a variety of incomes. 7.2 Housing Goals and Policies For the P AA, the following housing goal and policy have been developed. Housing Goal Promote the preservation and enhancement existing residential neighborhoods, and allow for new housing developments meeting future needs in the P AA. Housing Policy P AA House - 1 The City, in cooperation with King County, should promote the preservation of existing housing. Private investment should be encouraged in older residential neighborhoods, and multifamily complexes. Programs supporting weatherization, home repair and rehabilitation, and infrastructure maintenance should be supported. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Housing Element policies address housing stock protection, existing and future affordability, and special needs, and would also be applicable to the P AA. December 2003 28 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 8 PARKS AND RECREATION 8.1 Summary of Parks Planning Efforts and Inventory The City of Federal Way Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services (PRCS) Department has prepared a Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Comprehensive Plan, which was originally created in 1991 and updated in 1995 and 2000. The PRCS plan is currently being updated and, once completed, will be adopted by reference into the FWCP. The plan divides the City and P AA into subareas for purposes of long-range planning. The primary goal of the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Comprehensive Plan is to assure that a park serves every neighborhood in Federal Way. Currently, the City is providing 10.1 acres of parks per 1,000 population in the current City limits. The City's goal is to provide a level of service of 10.9 acres per 1,000 in population within the City limits. The City's goal is to maintain this level of service standard as Federal Way grows in population and size. The City of Federal Way's existing parks and recreational areas are divided into six categories. Each category represents a distinct type of recreational activity or opportunity. Please note that this classification system is for the existing parks only. The categories are: Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks, Regional Parks, Special Use Areas, Trails, and Undeveloped Land/Open Space Areas. The total parkland in Federal Way equals 846.0 acres as of year 2002. The P AA is primarily served by five County park sites totaling 109.52 acres. See Table 4. All of the active park facilities are located in the Lakeland community subarea, while natural park and passive park areas are found in the Star Lake and Camelot community subareas. Completed in 2000, the South County Ballfields Phase 2 is the only recent capital project completed in the P AA. Furthermore, King County Executive's Proposed 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program does not include plans for any new projects or improvements in the P AA. Table 4. P AA Park Facilities Owned By King County P AA Neighborhood Park Site Name County Park Plan Acreage Classification Star Lake Bingaman Pond Natural 16.72 Camelot Camelot Park Passive 18.08 Lakeland Five Mile Lake Park Active 31.71 Lake Geneva Park Active 18.64 South County Ballfields Active 24.3 7 Total Acres t 09.52 Source: Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18,2002 December 2003 29 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan In addition to King County parks, the Federal Way School District (during non- school hours) and the State of Washington also provide public recreation facilities and opportunities in the P AA. These include sites located in the Camelot, and North Lake community subareas. Private recreation facilities may also be required in residential subdivisions and developments of five units or more in accordance with King County development regulations and King County's determination of recreation facility needs. 8.2 Future Parks and Recreation Needs Currently, the PAA's existing amount of park acres does not meet the City's level of service standard for parks and recreation (see Table 5). Additionally with forecast growth additional demand for park services would occur. These existing and forecast park and recreation needs to meet City levels of service would require investment of capital and operating revenue sources to provide for park services. Table 6 identifies the capital costs of providing park services to meet existing and future parks & recreation needs for the major subareas of the P AA: Redondo, Northeast (Star Lake, Camelot, and North Lake) and Southeast (Lakeland, Jovita, Parkland). A discussion of public service operating and capital costs and revenues, including Parks & Recreation, can be found in Section 12, Public Services and Capital Facilities. Table 5. P AA and City Parks Levels of Service Redondo Northeast Southeast Federal Way Level of Service Measure East P AA PAA PAA Subarea Subarea A. Neighborhood Park Land Acres per 1,000 Population' Total acres of parks (2- 7 acres) with playgrounds divided by population (times 1,000) Actual Level of Service (acres per 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1,000) Level of Service Standard (acres per NA* NA* NA* 1.7 1,000) B. Community Park Land Acres per 1,000 Population' Total acres of community-wide parks (15-25 acres) for active use divided by population (times 1,000) Actual Level of Service (acres per 0 0 8.6 2.6 1,000) Level of Service Standard (acres per NA* NA* NA* 2.8 1,000) C. Trail Acres per 1,000 Population' Total acres of trail system divided by population (times 1,000) ** Actual Level of Service (acres per 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1,000) Level of Service Standard (acres per NA* NA* NA* 2.2 1,000) December 2003 30 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Redondo Northeast Southeast Federal Way Level of Service Measure East P AA PAA PAA Subarea Subarea D. Open Space Acres per 1,000 Population' Total acres undeveloped land by population (times 1,000) Actual Level of Service (acres per 0.0 3.0 0.0 4.2 1,000) Level of Service Standard (acres per NA* NA* NA* 6.0 1,000) . E. Community Center Square Feet per 1,000 Population' Total square feet - divided by population (times 1,000) Actual Level of Service (square feet 0.0 0.0 0.0 131 per 1,000) Level of Service Standard (square feet NA* NA* NA* 600 per 1,000) Source: Henderson, Young & Company, July 11,2003 * King County LOS standards are based on a parks classification system that is different than the City of Federal Way ** There are no trails in the PAA meeting the City's definition of a trail. Table 6. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Costs for Parks and Recreation Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 ID 1.00 Areawide CIP 0 0 0 0 Programs 2.00 Parkway Neighborhood 2.01 Neighborhood Parks 271,581 810,006 1,081,587 360,529 360,529 360,529 2.02 Community Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.03 Trails 229,878 1,348,618 1,578,496 526,165 526,165 526,165 2.04 Open Space 1,198,152 5,573 1,203,725 401,242 401,242 401,242 2.05 Community Center 0 334,368 334,368 111,456 111,456 111,456 Subtotal Parkway 0 1,699,611 2,498,565 4,198,176 1,399,392 1,399,392 1,399,392 Neighborhood 3.00 Jovita Neighborhood 3.01 Neighborhood Parks 89,416 266,688 356, I 04 118,701 118,701 118,701 3.02 Community Parks 147,273 774,897 922,170 307,390 307,390 307,390 3.03 Trails 75,686 444,022 519,708 173,236 173,236 173,236 3.04 Open Space 394,482 1,835 396,317 132,106 132,106 132,106 3.05 Community Center 0 110,088 110,088 36,696 36,696 36,696 Subtotal Jovita 0 706,857 1,597,530 2,304,387 768,129 768,129 768,129 Neighborhood 4.00 Lakeland Neighborhood December 2003 31 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 ID 4.01 Neighborhood Parks 198,072 590,761 788,833 262,944 262,944 262,944 4.02 Community Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.03 Trails 167,657 983,585 1,151,242 383,747 383,747 383,747 4.04 Open Space 873,846 4,064 877,910 292,637 292,637 292,637 4.05 Community Center 0 243,864 243,864 81,288 81,288 81,288 Subtotal Lakeland 0 1,239,575 1,822,274 3,061,849 1,020,616 1,020,616 1,020,616 Neighborhood Subtotal Southeast 0 3,646,043 5,918,369 9,564,412 3,188,137 3,188,137 3,188,137 Area 5.00 North Lake Neighborhood 5.01 Neighborhood Parks 146,434 436,748 583,182 194,394 194,394 194,394 5.02 Community Parks 241,185 1,269,027 1,510,212 503,404 503,404 503,404 5.03 Trails 123,948 727,162 851,110 283,703 283,703 283,703 5.04 Open Space 646,032 3,005 649,037 216,346 216,346 216,346 5.05 Community Center 0 180,288 180,288 60,096 60,096 60,096 Subtotal North Lake 0 1,157,599 2,616,230 3,773,829 1,257,943 1,257,943 1,257,943 Neighborhood 6.00 Star Lake Neighborhood 6.01 Neighborhood Parks 235,557 702,564 938,121 312,707 312,707 312,707 6.02 Community Parks 387,977 2,041,390 2,429,367 809,789 809,789 809,789 6.03 Trails 199,386 1,169,731 1,369,117 456,372 456,372 456,372 6.04 Open Space 320,264 1,490 321,754 107,251 107,251 107,251 6.05 Community Center 0 290,016 290,016 96,672 96,672 96,672 Subtotal Star Lake 0 1,143,184 4,205,191 5,348,375 1,782,792 1,782,792 1,782,792 Neighborhood' 7.00 Camelot Neighborhood 7.01 Neighborhood Parks 551,934 1,646,176 2,198,110 732,703 732,703 732,703 7.02 Community Parks 909,068 4,783,178 5,692,246 1,897,415 1,897,415 1,897,415 7.03 Trails 467,181 2,740,795 3,207,976 1,069,325 1,069,325 1,069,325 7.04 Open Space 1,657,564 7,710 1,665,274 555,091 555,091 555,091 7.05 Community Center 0 679,536 679,536 226,512 226,512 226,512 Subtotal Camelot 0 3,585,747 9,857,395 13,443,142 4,481,047 4,481,047 4,481,047 Neighborhood Subtotal Northeast 0 5,886,530 16,678,816 22,565,346 7,521,782 7,521,782 7,521,782 Area 8.00 Redondo East December 2003 32 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 ID Neighborhood XOI Neighborhood Parks 22,690 67,675 90,365 30,122 30,122 30,122 X.O2 Community Parks 37,372 196,63X 234,010 78,003 78,003 78,003 8.03 Trails 19,206 112,675 131,881 43,%0 43,960 43,960 8.04 Open Spaee 100,104 466 100,570 33,523 33,523 33,523 8.05 Community Center 0 27,936 27,936 9,312 9,312 9,312 Subtotal Redondo Area 0 179,372 405,390 584,762 194,921 194,921 194,921 Total 0 9,711,945 23,002,575 32,714,520 10,904,840 10,904,840 10,904,840 Source: Henderson Young and Company, 2003 To develop capital cost estimates, first, the standard for park land was multiplied times the population of each neighborhood in the P AA to calculate the number of acres of each type of park land that is needed to serve the population of each area, Second, the acres needed were compared to the number of acres of existing parks. Whenever the acres needed were more than the acres of existing parks, the difference is the number of acres to be acquired through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Third, the cost of acres to be acquired through the CIP was estimated using City estimates of costs per acre. The CIP project costs were calculated by multiplying the City's cost per acre (or mile, or square foot, as appropriate) times the number of acres (or miles or square feet) needed for each neighborhood. The portion of the park capital cost estimate that would be attributed to meeting the higher City parks level of service standard for the existing population (i.e. the cost of the existing "deficiency" -- providing Federal Way's level of service to the existing P AA population) is $25.6 million, and the cost of growth through the year 2020 is $7.1 million for a total cost of $32.7 million. The Northeast Subarea has low maintenance costs because it has little parkland now. The high capital cost in this CIP will bring the Northeast Subarea up to the City's standard, and that, in turn, will cause a significant increase in future operating costs. 8.3 Parks & Recreation Goals and Policies The following goal and policies address P AA parks and recreation needs. Parks Goal Maintain current facilities and acquire new lands to meet P AA community park and recreation needs. December 2003 33 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Parks Policies P AA Park - 1 The City should continue to address the P AA in its comprehensive parks, recreation, and open space system plans. P AA Park - 2. The City should review County park maintenance and operation plans for each County park facility that may be transferred in the event of annexation. The City will assess available resources at the time of annexation and determine the appropriate level of maintenance for all acquired County facilities. P AA Park - 3 Additional parkland, open space, and trails should be acquired and developed according to the standards outlined in the City of Federal Way Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Comprehensive Plan. Phasing in a gradually increasing level of service standard may be appropriate based on agency resources at the time of annexation. 9 SURFACE WATER 9.1 Summary of Inventory The P AA is almost entirely within the nearly level upland plateau which is immediately adjacent to steep slopes at the edge of the Green and White River valleys, and Puget Sound (in the case of the Redondo Subarea). As a result, historical stormwater systems within the P AA include a series of lake and wetland complexes that drain in steep ravines to the rivers and streams below. The most distinctive characteristic of the P AA is that most of the area is a headwater to several significant streams (Hylebos Creek, Mullen Slough, and Mill Creek). Five drainage basins have been identified by King County mapping within the P AA. These designations also agree with the City of Federal Way designations: Lower Green River, Mill Creek, White River, Hylebos Creek, and Lower Puget Sound. See Map VIII. Surface Water Facilities Within the various drainage basins, the P AA contains a variety of surface water facilities that require inspection and maintenance by several County divisions and/or property owners as listed in Tables 7 through 9: December 2003 34 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Table 7. In-Road Surface Water Facilities Measurement Unit Redondo Northeast Southeast Facility Subarea Subarea Subarea Curb And Gutter LF lineal feêt 1,902 252,806 92,206 Catch Basin & Manhole EA each 19 1,361.00 633 Paved Ditch And Gutter LF lineal feet 0 755 450 Open Ditch LF lineal feet 707 85,292.00 81,916.00 SP lineal feet Enclosed System stann pipe 1,557 149,913 70,980 Cross Tile And Access EA each 9 985 699 Cross Culverts EA each 7 614 332 Curb & Gutter And Thick RM road mile 0.3 55.2 22.5 Bridge Drains EA each 0 6 6 Auxiliary Pipe LF lineal feet I 2,697 1,611 Trash Racks EA each 0 0 0 Headwalls EA each 0 I 0 Cross Culverts LF lineal feet 0 590 0 Box Culverts EA each 0 0 0 RID Facilities EA each 0 2 I Source: King County Roads Division, January 2002 Table 8. Regional Storm water Facilities Subarea Facility Name Address Type Of Facility Northeast Sweet Briar Drainage 4700 S 292110 S1. Pipe Improvement (immediately east of 46 13 S. 292nd ) Northeast P-32 (Camelot Park) 29800 36tn PI. S. Pump Station Northeast Lake Dolloff Outlet 4200 308th PI. S. Channel/weir Southeast Peasley Canyon Culvert 5100 S. Peasley Canyon Rd. Culvert Southeast S. 360th S1. Embankment 2100 S. 360tn S1. Regional RID Southeast Regency Woods Div I 37546 21st Ave. S. HOPE Pipe Southeast Regency Woods Div I 37694 18th PI. S. HDPE Pipe Southeast Regency Woods Div 4 37934 23m PI. S. HOPE Pipe Southeast Regency Woods Div 4 37811 21st C1. S. HOPE Pipe Southeast Regency Woods Div 4 1817 S 380m PI. HOPE Pipe Source: King County Department of Natural Resources, December 21, 200 I; January 29, 2002 Table 9. Residential and Commercial Drainage Facilities Type Of Facility Subarea Number Of Facilities Residential Northeast 40 Southeast 26 Redondo 1 Total 67 December 2003 35 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Type Of Facility Subarea Number Of Facilities Commercia] Northeast 9 Southeast ]6 Redondo 4 Total 29 TOTAL 96 Source: King County Department of Natural Resources, December 21, 200]; January 29, 2002. Surface Water Leve] of Service Ana]ysis, July] 1,2003. Regional and local surface water facilities are shown on Map VIll. Surface Water Problems One function of drainage system maintenance is to respond to complaints and problems in connection with drainage conditions. The data in the PAA Inventory report (March 18,2002) indicated that most of the citizen complaints have come out of the Star Lake and Camelot neighborhoods in the Northeast subarea, two of the more populated neighborhoods. However, out of 160 complaints received in the past 5 years, only 8 remained open with the King County Roads Maintenance Division as of December 2002. The closed complaints were resolved in various ways: technical advice, determination that there was no identifiable problem, maintenance work, referral to other agencies, etc. Most complaints appeared to be resolved with routine responses. A few complaints required more study or action for resolution. No information was obtained about their disposition. It is likely that some of the more enduring problems overlap the drainage problems observed by King County Road Maintenance, discussed below. Discussion with King County Roads Maintenance Division 3 indicates a number of locations with drainage related problems. Certain street locations are subject to occasional flooding. Also, as noted in the P AA Inventory, the area around Lake Dolloff, is in a designated floodplain. Recently the Roads Maintenance Division addressed surface water problems with a 48-inch crosstile at Peasley Canyon Road, and a pipe and catch basin within an easement to Lake Geneva. The Peasley Canyon Road area is subject to landslide and erosion due to sensitive environmental conditions (designated landslide and erosion hazard area). Lake Geneva is subject to periodic maintenance for cleaning of inlets and drainage structures, which indicates potential for periodic sediment and debris accumulations. More problematic drainage conditions indicated by King County Roads Maintenance Division 3 are listed in Table 10. The drainage facilities and locations listed are subject to flooding by excessive stormwater flows, and must be monitored during storms. The problems are severe enough to warrant study of a design solution for the facility and the local drainage system. Several other nearby areas with known problems are also listed in the following Table 11. The problems may be related to drainage conditions in the P AA, possibly contributing flow or groundwater, and Federal Way may be asked to participate in a solution to December 2003 36 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan that problem. Problems on Tables 10 and 11 appear on Map VIII. Table 10. Road Maintenance Problems in P AA King County Maintenance Division J No. Subarea Street Problem 1. Northeast SE n¡.: St. (a 1-5 2 Catch basins 2. Northeast 3366 S. 290 St. 2 Catch basins 3. Northeast 3¡.: Ave. S. & S. 304 Water over road signs. On going problem. 4. Southeast S 342 St. & 44 Ave. S. Crossti1c e/of 44 Ave. S. Should be monitored. Source: King County Roads Maintenance Division 3, 2002, Updated April 2003 Table II. Road Maintenance Problems Near P AA King County Maintenance Division J No. Subarea Street Problem 5. Northeast S. 296 St. east of 64 Steep bank, excessive water. Should be monitored. Ave. S. w/ofW. Valley Rd from 64 Ave S. Down to Merideth Hill 6. Northeast S. 296th St east of 61 Crosstile to pond. Should be monitored. Ave. S. w/of 55 Ave. S. 7. Northeast Lower Lk. Fenwick Rd. 36" inlet to MH/lake overflow. Needs to be monitored. S. 8. Northeast West Valley Hwy bit S Flooding. Needs to be monitored. 272 - S 285 9. Redondo East Old Star Lake Road All inlets and Catch basins. Needs to be monitored. from S 272 to Military Source: King County Roads Maintenance Division 3, 2002, Updated April 2003 It is anticipated that after annexation, Federal Way will experience a similar level of complaints and responses in the P AA. Costs associated with complaint response would include staff time to respond to inquiries and issues, and the labor, equipment and materials to provide minor corrective actions. Non-routine problems, i.e. street flooding, severe stream bank erosion, etc., may become more identifiable over time and require further action. Certain problem areas may require continual non-routine maintenance due to existing environmental conditions (such as Peasley Canyon Road), or could become candidates for further study and capital improvements (such as Lakes Geneva and Dolloff). 9.2 Future Surface Water Needs As part of a more detailed level of service analysis (Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11, 2003), program and capital improvements have been identified. To transition the P AA from the existing County level of service to the Federal Way program for surface water, the following actions will be needed: . The City will need to conduct a field inventory of the storm drainage conveyance system for inclusion in a map or GIS database. December 2003 37 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . The City facilities and GIS databases will need to be updated to provide coverage of the P AA. The increased inventory of facilities to maintain, due to the annexation, will over the long term require a propOliional increase in the City's maintenance budget. . . Increased program space needs will possibly require larger maintenance facilities than those currently planned by Federal Way and possibly accelerate the need for new facilities. It is anticipated that after annexation, Federal Way will experience a level of complaints and responses in the P AA similar to current levels. Costs associated with complaint response would include staff time to respond to inquiries and issues, and the labor, equipment and materials to provide minor corrective actions. . . Non-routine problems, i.e. street flooding, severe stream bank erosion, etc., may become more identifiable over time and require further action. Certain problem areas may require continual non-routine maintenance due to existing environmental conditions (such as Peasley Canyon Road), or could become candidates for further study and capital improvements (such as Lakes Geneva and Dolloff). Ten Regional Stormwater Facilities constructed and maintained by King County will need to be maintained by Federal Way. . . King County has identified 67 residential and 29 commercial drainage facilities in the P AA. The residential facilities are inspected and maintained by King County. The commercial facilities are inspected by King County and maintained by the property owner. Federal Way will need to evaluate the feasibility of inspection and maintenance. An initial sustained cleaning effort will likely be needed to bring the ditch system to a level of improvement where minimal routine maintenance would be needed. This could take approximately two years, depending on the levels of accumulations and restoration needed, and may need to respond to the Tri-County Regional Road Maintenance Program, a program that implements road maintenance practices that protect habitat by reducing pollutants and sediment from reaching environmentally sensitive areas such as rivers, streams and wetlands. The program also encourages the removal of old road culverts and other blockages that prevent fish from reaching spawning areas. It is anticipated with the annexation that Federal Way may take a more active role with the drainage and water quality aspects of the P AA lake system. There are various options for Federal Way to set up the lake management system, including use of homeowners associations, lake management districts, and the City's stormwater management utility. . . . Upon annexation of the P AA, it is anticipated that Federal Way will expand its water quality program to provide more lake water quality December 2003 38 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . management and surface water quality monitoring. This could include a variety of program elements, such as volunteer groups, monitoring stations, community organization, and public education. Federal Way will need to increase other stormwater program components to include the P AA. A notable expansion element will be a field inventory of the storm drainage system, which is a part of the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination requirement in the Phase Il National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. . Potential capital improvements are anticipated to include: 0 The four problem areas indicated in Table 10, from King County Maintenance Division 3. Some additional improvements may be needed depending on the outcome of complaints that have remained open as shown in the P AA Inventory. 0 King County Executive Proposed Basin Plan for Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound include the following: - Project 2442: S. 360th Street Regional Detention Pond - Construct a regional detention facility on tributary 00 116A at about S 360th Street (extended). This project may be completed through a partnership with the Washington State Department of Transportation and the City of Federal Way. - Project 2444: SR 161 Conveyance Upgrades - Upgrade three culvert crossings at tributaries 00 16A, 0016, and 0006. - Project 2446: SR 161 Regional Pond - Construct a regional detention facility on tributary 0015 at SR 161. As the Basin Plan is ten years old, it is likely that the conditions and potential project list should be re-examined and prioritized. 0 There are several projects identified in the Mill Creek Special Area Management Plan and Mill Creek Basin Flood Management Plan. These projects are not within the PAA, however the City of Federal Way may be asked to help adjacent jurisdictions with cost sharing in the future if annexation occurs because King County was identified as a possible agency which could provide cost sharing and because of the location of the headwaters for these projects within the P AA. The projects identified are as follows: - Bingaman Creek Levee Overflow Improvements (King County). - Study of Mullen Slough Intercept Hillside Drainage (King County). - Sediment Trap on Peasley Canyon Tributary (City of Auburn). Due to the date of the basin study in 1997, some of these projects may December 2003 39 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan have begun and may have received funding from other sources. These projects are not within the P AA and were not included in P AA CIP cost estimates. To meet City surface water level of service standards, and accomplish the studies and improvements identified in the P AA studies, capital cost estimates have been developed and are summarized in Table 12. Table 12. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Costs for Surface Water Capital Improvements Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Year of Construction and 2002 Dollars (000) Project ID Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 1.00 Area Wide Programs 1.01 Stonn Drain System 300 300 300 Inventory and Comprehensive Plan Major Maintenance: 1.02 Ditch Cleaning 544 544 1.03 Stonnwater Facility 223 223 Cleaning Subtotal Genera 300 1,067 1,067 2.00 Parkway Neighborhood Hylebos Executive Proposed Plan 2.01 2442-S 360th Regional Det. 1,565 1,565 Pond 2.02 2444-SR 161 Conveyance 372 372 Upgrades 4.00 Lakeland Neighborhood Hylebos Executive Proposed Plan 4.01 2446-SR 161 Regional 598 598 Pond King County Road Maintenance Div 3 ~ Identified Problems 4.02 Crosstile east of 44 Ave. S 7 35 42 42 Subtotal Southeast Area 7 35 2,578 2,578 7.00 Camelot Neighborhood King County Road Maintenance Div 3 ~ Identified ProblEms December 2003 40 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Year of Construction and 2002 Dollars (000) Project ID Capi tal Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 7JJ! ( I ) 2 Catch basins 7 35 42 42 7.02 (2) 2 Catch basins 7 35 42 42 7.03 (5) Water over road signs 165 X25 990 990 Subtotal Northeast Area 179 895 1,074 1,074 Subtotal Redondo Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 486 0 930 4,719 4,719 Source: TetraTechiKCM, Inc., 2003 Notes: (I) All projects assumed for construction in 5 years unless differently stated in source CIP document (2) No separate cost given for design, acquisition for Hylebos, certain other CIP figures (3) Estimated cost for maintenance problems and projects assume 100 percent contingency (very general estimates). Permitting costs were assumed to be included in the contingency. (4) Costs escalated from original sources to 2002 dollars (5) Does not include water quality program costs, including lake management (6) Does not include routine maintenance increase, such as catch basin cleaning, street sweeping. (7) There are several projects identified in the Mill Creek SAMP and Mill Creek Basin Flood Management Plan. These projects are not within the PAA, however the City of Federal Way may be asked to help adjacent jurisdictions with cost sharing in the future if annexation occurs because King County was identified as a possible agency which could provide cost sharing and because of the location of the headwaters for these projects within the PAA. However, there has been no determination of specific cost share by Federal Way, and none are estimated above. (8) Cost data for estimates were derived from the following sources: a. Federal Way estimates for ditch cleaning, with a 33 percent contingency. b. Federal Way staff information for pond cleaning costs. Pond facilities (wet ponds, infiltration facilities, etc.) were estimated at $5,000 per facility. Other facilities (catch basins, tanks, etc.) were assumed at $1,000 per facility. The costs were assumed to include some contingency; therefore, no additional contingency was applied. c. Planning cost estimates for stormwater facilities developed for the City of Auburn 2002 Comprehensive Drainage Plan. Conveyance costs included a ratio of four catch basins per 300 feet. When individual catch basins or manholes were indicated, separate cost estimates for the catch basin or manhole were made, using the planning cost estimates developed for the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) outfall inventory project (2002). d. Costs for certain stormwater facilities, and costs for mobilization, traffic control, tax, engineering, and land acquisition were obtained from planning cost estimates developed for WSDOT outfall inventory project (2002). A discussion of public service operating and capital costs and revenues including the Surface Water enterprise fund, can be found in Section 12, Public Services and Capital Facilities. 9.3 Surface Water Goals and Policies Surface water management would be guided by the following goal and policies. Surface Water Goal Promote a PAA surface water system that protects the environment and property, and allows for efficient operation and maintenance. December 2003 41 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Surface Water Policy In addition to Natural Environment and Capital Facility policies, the following policy is provided specific to surface water concerns: P AA SW -1 Prior to annexations of large areas, the County, in conjunction with the City and in partnership with other agencies, should further inventory surface water facilities and conditions, and prepare hydrologic models and basin plans for the PAA areas east off-5. Surface water analysis of the Redondo East Subarea should occur as necessary, in conjunction with any area-wide subbasin or basin plans for the vicinity. 10 TRANSPORTATION 10.1 Summary of Inventory The Federal Way P AA is served by a series of arterial roadways that provide local and regional transportation access. Refer to Map IX King County has been responsible for maintenance of public roadways and accompanying facilities such as shoulders, sidewalks, traffic signs, striping and signals, guardrails, and landscaping. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has jurisdiction over state highways within the P AA. State Highways located within the boundaries of the Study Area include Interstate 5 (1-5), SR-18, SR-99 (Pacific Highway S) and SR-161 (Enchanted Parkway S). The City of Federal Way is currently responsible for the maintenance of these facilities within the City limits, except I-5 and SR-18, which are currently maintained by WSDOT. Transit service, including several park and ride facilities along the 1- 5 Corridor, is provided by King County Metro. The majority of the street network in the PAA is characteristically rural with asphalt concrete pavement, gravel shoulders, and ditches for drainage purposes. The street network is largely underdeveloped, with many cul-de-sacs and dead- end streets creating insufficient connectivity. Furthermore, a general lack of sidewalks and existing luminaires inhibit pedestrian traffic and present public safety concerns. Luminaires are limited to street intersections along arterial streets and newer subdivisions, with very few mid-block luminaires along arterial streets. Most arterial corridors in the P AA, particularly in the Southeast, lack sidewalks and, in most cases, are poorly lit. As shown in Table 13, sidewalks are a smaller percent of lane road miles. December 2003 42 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Table 13. Street Inventory Within P AA I nventory Item Redondo East Northeast Subarea Southeast Subarea Subarea All Road Miles* 0.3 miles 46.6 miles 28.9 miles All Paved Road Surfaces, Lane Miles 0.6 93.2 57.3 Curb & Gutter (linear 1,902 252,806 92,206 feet) (-0.4 miles) (~48 miles) (-17 miles) Paved Sidewalk, one side 0.4 miles 25.5 miles 12.3 miles (miles) Traffic Signals (EA)** 0 12 2 Luminaires (EA) 10 561 190 Street Signs (EA)*** 37 980 520 Notes: *There are several street clusters in the Study Area for which road logs do not exist, including: private streets (approx. 7 miles), as well as several unmaintained public gravel streets (approx. 7 miles), and in some cases relatively new public asphalt streets (about 1-2 miles), and these are not included in the totals above. **Based upon City staff review and field confinnation, there appear to be nine signals, two flashing beacons, one fire signal and two traffic signals on SR 161 (currently WSDOT responsibility) that would become the City's responsibility upon annexation. Controllers would need to be replaced to connect to the City's system. *** King County does not inventory street name signs, which would understate the number of signs maintained. Source: King County Roads The largest traffic volumes exist along east/west arterial routes, which provide access to 1..:5. Over half of the arterial roadway miles within the study area have accident rates that are higher than the average King County accident rates. 10.2 Existing and Future Transportation levels of Service The purpose of the intersection level-of-service (LOS) analysis is to identify LOS deficiencies in the City's P AA and then evaluate the improvements that will be needed to meet the City's LOS standard. LOS is a letter designation that describes a range of operating conditions along a roadway segment or at an intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM2000) defines the LOS concept as "a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in tenns of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience." Six grades of LOS are defined for traffic operational analysis. They are given letter designations A through F, with LOS A representing the best range of December 2003 43 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan operating conditions and LOS F the worst. The specific terms in which each level of service is defined vary with the type of transportation facility involved. In general, LOS A describes a free-flowing condition in which individual vehicles in the traffic stream are not affected by the presence of other vehicles. LOS F generally describes a breakdown in operations that occurs when traffic arriving at a point is greater than the facility's capacity to discharge the traffic flow; consequently, vehicle queues develop. Existin2 LOS For this study, LOS was analyzed at a total of twenty-five (25) intersections with the results presented in Map X. Intersection LOS analyses were performed using Highway Capacity Software Version 4.1b (HCS2000). Representative intersections in various parts of the PAA that the City and/or County monitor now, or desire to monitor in the future when the roadways are constructed, were analyzed. (Based on information from the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11,2003.) In base year of 2000, the LOS analysis was done by using actual traffic counts between years 2000 to 2002. Analysis indicated that all signalized intersections operated at an acceptable LOS during the PM peak hour and most unsignalized intersections were operating at an acceptable LOS. Exceptions included: S 288th Street at 51st Avenue S S 296th Street at 51 st A venue S SR 99 at 16th Avenue S LOSF LOSF LOSF Future LOS Analysis of the transportation impacts of future land use requires development of future transportation networks. The future land use projection analyzed is based on Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) projections and market analysis, and was developed for the year 2020 (based on information from the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11,2003). In order to determine a future road network, the City provided a future street improvement list by analyzing the Transportation Improvement Programs, comprehensive plans, and near term transportation improvement projects of King County, the Washington State Department of Transportation, and the City of Federal Way. In order to analyze the year 2020 LOS, future intersection volumes were estimated using a calibrated EMME/2 transportation model. On behalf of the City, Mirai Associates developed the EMME/2 model based on the forecasted land use and future transportation improvements described briefly above. The results of the analysis are shown in Map XI (based on information from the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11, 2003). Overall the most congested locations included are those with two-way stop control, and those December 2003 44 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan located in the Military Road corridor. 20-year intersection LOS deficiencies are shown in Map XI. The average vehicle delay and LOS changes are: Congested Locations Military Road S at S 272,,1 Street Military Road S at S 320Ù'Street S 277'h Street at 55'h Avenue S Average Vehicle Delay and LOS Change from 42 sec to 116 sec, from 0 to F from 27 sec to 73 sec, from C to E from 59 see to 195 see, from E to F S 288'h Street at 51" A venue S Military Road S at S 312th Street Peasley Canyon Way S at S Peasley Canyon Road from 64 see to 361 see, from F to F Military Road S at Peasley Canyon Way S Military Road S at S Star Lake Road (N Jet.) 5151 Avenue S at S 2961h Street Exceeds calculable limits (ECL) from 26 sec to 351 sec, from 0 to F from 34 sec to 559 sec, from D to F Military Road S at S 360th Street 28th A venue S at S 360'h Street SR 99 at 16th Avenue S from 39 sec to ECL, from E to F from 106 sec to 996 sec, from F to F from 22 sec to ECL, from C to F from 46 sec to 770 see, from E to F Exceeds calculable limits (ECL) To determine the additional improvements needed to meet the City's LOS standard, the lowest cost capacity improvement is sought to address identified deficiency and then LOS analysis is conducted with the recommended improvements to insure that all locations will meet the City's LOS standard. With the recommended improvements listed in Table 14 and shown on Map XII, the City's LOS standard is met at all future deficient locations. Table 14. Future LOS and Recommended Improvements 2020 Recommended Improved Intersection LOS Problem Improvements LOS 1. Military Road S @ S 272nd Street F Substantial demand for Add one additional 0 southbound traffic. southbound through lane. 2. Military Road S @ S 320th Street E Substantial demand for Construct an D eastbound right turn eastbound right traffic. turn lane. 3. S 277th Street @ 55th Avenue S F The northbound right turn Construct new E demand is queuing while signalized waiting for the eastbound intersection. to westbound through green cycle. ~. S 288th Street @ 51 st Avenue S F Insufficient intersection Construct a left 0 capacity for the A WSC turn lane from (25-sec intersection. westbound to southbound. delay) December 2003 45 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 2020 Recommended Improved Intersection LOS Problem Improvements LOS Install a traffic 0 signal. ( 4 7 -see delay) 5. Military Road S eel¿ S J 12th Street F Traffic demand on Install a traffic 0 eastbound approach signal with one exceeds the LOS for eastbound left turn TWSC intersections. pocket and one eastbound right . turn lane. 6. Peasley Canyon Way S @ S Peasley F Traffic demand on Install a traffic C Canyon Road northbound approach signal. exceeds the LOS for TWSC intersections. 7. Military Road S @ Peasley Canyon F Traffic demand on the Install a traffic B WayS east/west approaches signal at Military exceeds the LOS for Road Sand S TWSC intersections. 340th Street and close the southbound movement on Peasley Canyon Way S from S 340th to Military Road S. 8. Military Road S @ S Star Lake Road (N F Traffic demand on Install a traffic B Jet.) westbound approach signal with an exceeds the LOS for additional TWSC intersections. southbound through lane. 9. 51 st A venue S @ S 296th Street F Traffic demand on Install a traffic B westbound approach signal with exceeds the LOS for additional TWSC intersections. southbound and westbound left turn pockets. 10. Military Road S @ S 360th Street F Traffic demand on the Install a traffic C east/west approaches signal with exceeds the LOS for additional TWSC intersections. northbound and southbound left turn pockets. II. 28th A venue S @ S 360th Street F Insufficient intersection Install a traffic C capacity for the A WSC signal with one intersection. southbound right turn pocket and one southbound through lane. December 2003 46 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 2020 Recommended Improved Intersection LOS Problem Improvements LOS 12. SR 99 @ 16th Avenue S / S 279th Place F Traffic demand on Install a traffic E eastbound approach signal. exceeds the LOS for TWSC intersections. Source: Jones & Stokes 2003 (Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level o(Service Analysis, July ll, 2003) Notes: A WSC = All Way Stop Controlled; TWSC = Two Way Stop Controlled The total estimated capital cost for roadway improvements in the P AA, existing and future needs to achieve levels of service, is $10,882,000 through 2020, as - ""- shown in Table 15. About 21 percent of the total capital facility cost estimate is related to existing deficiencies ($2,241,000). Existing deficiencies due to levels of service below E were found at: . S 2881h Street at 5151 Avenue S S 2961h Street at 5151 Avenue S SR 99 at 16th A venue S . . Of the three subareas in the P AA, the Northeast Subarea has the largest estimated roadway cost at $7,561,000. The largest part of this is the Military Road South project described above. The Southeast Subarea has an estimated roadway capital cost of$3,039,000, with the largest project consisting of a $1,188,000 improvement to the Military Road South/South 360th Street intersection. The Redondo East Subarea has a total roadway cost of $282,000, which consists entirely of the SR 99/16th Avenue South intersection improvement project. Table 15. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Costs for Roadway Improvements Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 ID 1.00 Areawide CIP Programs 0 0 0 0 2.00 Parkway Neighborhood 3.00 Jovita Neighborhood 3.01 Peasley Canyon Way S & S 41 0 234 275 275 Peasley Canyon Rd Intersection Improvement 3.02 Peasley Canyon Way S & Military 158 16 916 1,090 1,090 Rd S Intersection Improvement 4.00 Lakeland Neighborhood 4.01 Military Rd S & S 360th St 162 84 942 1,188 1,188 Intersection Improvement December 2003 47 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 ID 4.02 28th Ave S & S 360th St 65 47 374 486 - 486 Intersection Improvement Subtotal Southeast Area 426 147 2,466 3,039 1,188 1,576 275 5.00 North Lake Neighborhood 5.01 S 320th St & Military Rd S 108 165 623 896 896 I ntersection Improvement 6.00 Star Lake Neighborhood 6.01 Military Rd S & S 272nd St 91 327 528 946 946 Intersection Improvement 6.02 Military Rd S & S Star Lake Rd 41 0 234 275 275 (N Jet) Intersection Improvement 6.03 Military Rd S Improvement - S 305 496 1,770 2,571 0 801 1,770 272nd St to S Star Lake Road 6.04 S 277th St & 55th Ave S 92 291 531 914 914 Intersection Improvement 7.00 Camelot Neighborhood 7.01 S 288th St & 51st Ave S 66 0 385 451 451 Intersection Improvement 7.02 S 296th St & 51st Ave S 206 109 1,193 1,508 1,508 Intersection Improvement 7.03 S 312nd St Improvement 0 Subtotal Northeast Area 909 1,388 5,264 7,561 2,234 1,747 3,580 8.00 Redondo East Neighborhood 8.01 SR-99 & 16th Ave S Intersection 41 0 241 282 282 Improvement Subtotal Redondo Area 41 o 241 282 282 o o Subtotal LOS Projects 1,376 1,535 7,489 10,882 3,704 3,323 3,855 9.00 Southeast Areawide 9.01 Paving 19,200 19,200 6,400 6,400 6,400 9.02 Curb and Gutter 5,400 5,400 1,800 1,800 1,800 9.03 Sidewalk 7,400 7,400 2,400 2,600 2,400 Subtotal Southeast Area 32,000 32,000 10,600 10,800 10,600 10.00 Northeast Areawide 10.01 Paving 13,900 13,900 4,600 4,700 4,600 10.02 Curb and Gutter 6,100 6,100 2,000 2,100 2,000 10.03 Sidewalk 10,900 10,900 3,600 3,700 3,600 Subtotal Northeast Area 30,900 30,900 10,200 10,500 10,200 11.00 Redondo East Neighborhood 11.01 Curb and Gutter 32 32 10 12 10 December 2003 48 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 200R-2014 2015-2020 If) IIJI2 Sidewalk jl) jl) 13 n n Subtotal Redondo Area 71 71 23 25 23 Subtotal Road Cross Section 0 0 62,971 62,971 20,823 21,325 20,823 Improvements - - - Total 1,376 1.535 70,460 73,853 24,527 24,648 24,678 Source: Jones & Stokes, 2003 Notes: Current expenses for similar construction work within the region were reviewed to determine unit prices for broad categories of construction line items and typical percentages for standard items. All LOS project costs assume a 30 pereent contingency factoL While the focus of the capital cost estimates are the improvements required to ensure the City's intersection LOS would be met, other capital costs may be incurred to bring essentially rural road standards to the City's urban road standards (e.g. curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving of public gravel or public bituminous surface roads). These road cross-section improvements may be made incrementally as new development makes street frontage improvements, or through local improvement districts, or other means. The road cross-section estimates were made in a preliminary fashion for order of magnitude level of analysis, using as a basis data provided by the County on lane miles, feet of sidewalk, etc. in the P AA. The Northeast Subarea and Southeast Subarea have similar road cross-section costs at $30,900,000 and $32,000,000 respectively. The cross-section improvements in Redondo East Subarea total $71,000. Please refer to Table 15. A discussion of public service operating and capital costs and revenues, including Transportation, can be found in Section 12, Public Services and Capital Facilities. 10.3 Transportation Goals and Policies Transportation would be guided by the following goal and policies. Transportation Goal Establish a safe, coordinated, and linked multimodal transportation system serving local and area-wide travel needs. Transportation Policies P AA Trans - 1 Prior to annexations, particularly in the Northeast and Southeast Subareas, the City and County should jointly classify streets in the P AA consistent with Federal, State, and City guidelines, and future roadway usage. Joint City-County street standards should also be established, such as the City of Federal Way standards, a hybrid of standards, or others as determined by the City and County. This may be achieved through an interlocal agreement and any December 2003 49 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan required County Comprehensive Plan amendments. The joint classification system will help ensure a common set of standards are applied as new roadway improvements are proposed and implemented in the P AA, and that the roadways meet City standards upon annexation. The City classification system for the P AA is presented in Map IX. P AA Trans - 2 Joint City and County street standards identified in P AA Trans- I should address: . Property access . Street signs . Street lighting . Pedestrian and bicycle safety . Street widths. P AA Trans - 3 As development proposals are proposed or capital improvements are implemented in the P AA prior to annexation, the City and County should encourage the connection of streets when considering subdivision or street improvement proposals, unless prevented by topographic or environmental constraints. The City and County should limit the use of cul-de- sacs, dead-end streets, loops, and other designs that form barriers to a coordinated transportation network in the community. P AA Trans - 4 The City should work with the County to ensure uniform maintenance standards for public streets are instituted and conducted by the County until such time as annexation occurs. P AA Trans - 5 Prior to annexation of P AA properties, the County, in consultation with the City, should review high accident locations, and improve street safety and functions focusing efforts at the most critical locations. P AA Trans - 6 To ensure that City and County LOS standards are met as development occurs prior to annexation, the City and County should agree to joint implementation of LOS standards for concurrency. Development applicants should prepare reports that contain dual analysis of the County's Transportation Adequacy Measurement (TAM) and Roadway Segment level of service standards and the City's LOS E intersection standard. PAA Trans - 7 Prior to annexation of the Northeast and Southeast Subareas, a coordinated Capital Improvement Program should be prepared between the City and County to ensure that improvements required to meet levels of service are implemented concurrent with development. P AA Trans - 8 The City and County shall continue to coordinate with park- and-ride and transit service providers in establishing appropriate LOS for the P AA, promoting alternative modes and assisting the achievement of LOS December 2003 50 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan standards. P AA Trans - 9 Prior to annexation of the Northeast and Southeast Subareas, as part of a P AA interlocal agreement the City and County shall establish a regional traffic planning and mitigation payment system. 11 PRIVATE UTILITIES Utilities described in this section include electric (power), natural gas, telephone, and cable. Public utilities are described under Public Services and Capital Facilities. Private utility providers rely on coordination of information such as population and employment forecasts as well as coordination of construction activities, such as street improvements. 11.1 Summary of PAA Inventory Electric Electric utility service for the Federal Way PAA is provided by Puget Sound Energy (PSE). The PSE grid provides a link between the Bonneville Power Administration (BP A) Bulk Transmission System and the local distribution system that connects with customers. Bulk transmission lines supply power into the Federal Way distribution system and provide connections to Tacoma City Light, King, and Pierce Counties. Power is transferred from the transmission system to the PSE local distribution system at distribution sub-stations. There are 115,000 volt, 230,000 volt, and 500,000 volt transmission lines in the Federal Way PAA. Distribution substations transform voltages of 11SkV (Kilovolt) or greater to lower voltages of 12 or 34kV. Electric Substations serving the Federal Way PAA include: Marine View; Lakota; Belmor; Christopher; Weyerhaeuser; Starwood; Kitts Comer; and West Campus. Most of the Substations include one or two 25,000 kV A transformers. The load on the substation varies continuously, exactly meeting the demand of the customers. The average PSE residential customer uses approximately 2 kV A per person during peak winter conditions. Commercial loads are highly business specific. (Based on information found in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18, 2002.) As new development occurs or consumer electrical demand increases, future substations will be needed to meet the increased demand. The future substations in the PSE long-range plan include: Federal Way; Dolloff; Twin Lakes; Enchanted; Five Mile Lake; and Killamey. There are planned expansions at Marine View Substation and the development of the Transmission line corridor between Christopher and Marine View. There are also future 115 kV lines planned in the Five Mile Lake area (in Lakeland). (Based on information found December 2003 51 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18, 2002.) Natural Gas Puget Sound Energy provides natural gas to the Federal Way P AA. The PSE customer count in the Federal Way P AA is approximately 5,250. Natural gas is not an essential service, and-therefore PSE is not mandated to serve all areas. Significant lines in or near the P AA include a 12" STW (steel wrap) supply main located in Military Road South and 6" STW located in 288th Street. At this time within the Federal Way P AA, no improvements are planned to existing facilities. Long Range plans for the years 2006-2007 call for installation of a 16" STW High Pressure supply main from Auburn Valley to the Star Lake area, and the route is still in the planning stage. (Based on information found in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18, 2002.) Telephone Qwest delivers telecommunication services to the Federal Way planning area as regulated by WUTc. Qwest is required by law to provide adequate telecommunications services on demand. Accordingly, Qwest will provide facilities to accommodate whatever growth pattern occurs within the P AA. Due to advances in technology, additional capacity is easily and quickly added to the system. (Based on information found in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area InventO1Y, Final, March 18, 2002.) Wireless Service and Cable Providers Numerous wireless service providers currently serve the City of Federal Way and the P AA. Comcast Cable serves the majority of the City and P AA. (Based on information found in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18, 2002.) 11.2 Private Utilities Goals and Policies Coordination with private utilities is addressed in the following goal and policy. Private Utilities Goal Facilitate provision of electric, natural gas, telecommunication, and cable services to the greater Federal Way community. Private Utilities Policy P AA Utility - 1 The County and City should coordinate with electric, natural gas and telecommunication providers to ensure P AA services support planned growth, meet desired customer service needs, and result in a comparable community system in the greater Federal Way area. December 2003 52 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 12 PUBLIC SERVICES AND CAPITAL FACILITIES This section provides a summary of current and projected public services and capital facilities in the P AA, addressing local government as well as special district services and facilities. For services that the City would provide if the P AA were to be annexed, an analysis of operating and capital costs and revenues is provided based upon the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Annexation Feasibility Report, December 2003. 12.1 Inventory of Public Services Likely to Change as a Result of Annexation General Government The City of Federal Way and King County house a variety of operations such as administration, public safety, court services, community/senior centers, and maintenance bases at government facilities. The P AA contains the following County government facility: Lake Dolloff Community Policing Storefront just west of 51 st Avenue S. in the Camelot neighborhood. A private, non-profit senior center operates in the P AA at S. 352nd Street in the Lakeland neighborhood. While this facility has received some King County and City of Federal Way funding, it is not owned or operated by either jurisdiction. Also, the North Lake Improvement Club clubhouse is a non-profit center available for public use, although not owned or operated by the City of Federal Way or King County. The operating costs that could be borne by the City, if it annexed the P AA and provided General Government services, is estimated in Table 17 further below. (Also see Section 8 regarding capital costs for community centers.) Parks and Recreation Please refer to subsections 8 and 12.2. Police Services The King County Sheriff provides police protection services to the P AA. The P AA is served by Precinct 3, George Sector, with its headquarters in Maple Valley. However, there is a local storefront police station near Lake Dolloff in the Camelot neighborhood. The substation is not manned for general public visitors, and one must call and leave a message. Although calls for service in the P AA have decreased by five percent between 1999 and 2000, during this time period the number of traffic citations and traffic accident events increased by 17 and 12 percent respectively. As of 2000, the crime rate of35.26 per 1,000 population was nearly equal to the crime rate for the December 2003 53 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan countywide area patrolled by the Sheriff's Office. According to the King County Executive's Proposed 2002~2007 Capital Improvement Program, there are no new proposed or expanded capital facilities in the Federal Way P AA. At the time of incorporation, the City contracted with the King County Sheriffs Department for police services. In the spring of 1995, the City decided to terminate its contract relationship with King County and fonn its own police department. The City's Public Safety Department began limited service on September 16, 1996, and was fully operational on October 16, 1996. Federal Way's Public Safety Department could be expanded at some time in the future so that it could effectively provide services to the P AA. (A comparison of levels of service in the County and City can be found in Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11,2003.) State laws require and establish procedures for the lateral transfer to a City of qualified county sheriffs office employees who would otherwise be laid off as a result of the annexation of unincorporated territory into that city (RCW 35.13.360 to 400). The City would not be required to put all transferring employees on the police department payroll. It is within the City's discretion to detennine what staffing provides an adequate level of law enforcement service. Estimates of public safety operating costs to the City should annexation occur are provided in Table 17 below. Solid Waste The King County Department of Natural Resources, Solid Waste Division, operates King County's transfer and disposal system comprised of a regional landfill, eight transfer stations, and two rural drop boxes for residential and non- residential self-haul customers and commercial haulers. The closest waste transfer station to the PAA and the City of Federal Way is in the City of Algona. Unincorporated areas of King County are served by private garbage collection companies, which receive oversight through the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC). While Federal Way Disposal serves the City of Federal Way, local haulers within the PAA operate within two service areas: Allied Service Area (SeaTac Disposal) and Waste Management and Allied Service Area (Sea- Tac Disposal and RST Disposal), with the dividing line at about S. 300th Street. In the event of annexation, the City may decide to contract for solid waste collection or undertake solid waste collection itself. However, in accordance with State Law, the holder of the franchise or pennit in the annexing area may continue to operate for the remaining tenn of the original franchise or penn it, or for seven years, whichever time period is shorter (RCW 35A.14.900). In the Parkway neighborhood, the Puyallup/Kit Comer Landfill is sited southeast of the 1-5 and SR-18 interchange. This landfill was closed in the mid-1960's prior December 2003 54 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan to existing regulations requiring extensive environmental controls. Environmental systems are being monitored and maintained, and gas extraction systems are in place. Estimates of solid waste operating costs to the City should annexation occur are provided in Table 17 below. Surface Water See Subsections 9 and 12.2. Transportation See Subsection 10 and 12.2. 12.2 Summary of Fiscal Impacts and Strategies Fiscal Impacts Summary The City of Federal Way would experience a significant negative fiscal impact on its operating budget if the Southeast and Northeast Major Subareas (Southeast: Lakeland, Jovita, Parkway neighborhoods; Northeast: Star Lake, Camelot, and North Lake neighborhoods) were annexed to the City and the City used the same revenue sources and rates, and provided the same level of services as it provides to the residents and businesses in the current boundaries of the City. The annual deficit would be just under $3.6 million ($8.2 million cost; $4.6 million revenue). The cost of providing the City's levels of service in the PAA would exceed revenues from the PAA by 78 percent annually. The net operating revenue (or net costs) presented here represent the gap between operating revenues generated in each of the PAAs under the City's 2003 revenue structure and the costs of extending 2003 levels of City services to the same areas. In order to present a full picture of operating impacts, this presentation combines fiscal impacts across a number of disparate City Funds. The City would undoubtedly continue City policy that Surface Water Management (SWM) costs would be covered by Surface Water Fees within the structure of the Surface Water Enterprise Fund. Such a strategy would require increased SWM fees and/or decreased levels of SWM services by $538,000 (the difference between estimated SWM operating costs ($823,000) given current service levels and estimated revenues ($285,000). The remaining $3.0 million gap, then, would be bridged through some combination of other strategies. Another way of understanding the fiscal impact of the approximately $3.4 million deficit is to see how it compares to the combined revenue ofthe City of Federal Way and the combined Northeast/Southeast PAA subareas. If Federal Way and the Northeast and Southeast P AA subareas are viewed as a single City of over 105,000 population, the annual deficit of $3.6 million equals six percent of the combined operating revenue. It would be like running a business that loses six December 2003 55 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan percent every year. In addition, the City of Federal Way would experience major costs for capita! improvements in the P AA totaling over $48.3 million. Dedicated capital revenue is anticipated to be $32.0 million through the year 2020, leaving an unfunded cost of S 16.3 million (which averages $0.9 million per year through 2020). As noted for operating costs above, City policy for surface water (and other enterprise activities) is to cover costs with fee revenue. Assuming that the City would use enterprise policy to cover the $4.7 million cost of stormwater capital, the remaining deficit would be $11,564,520 (which is an annual average of $642,473). In addition, the City will undoubtedly receive mitigation payments or impact fees from development in the P AA, which were not possible to estimate at this time, but they would reduce the size of the deficit. Tables 16 to 21 provide the cost and revenue information supporting the conclusions above: Table 16. Operating Revenues Generated, by P AA (2003) Northeast Southeast PAA PAA Redondo Total Property Tax $947,000 $699,000 $24,000 $1,670,000 State Shared Revenues $365,000 $264,000 $8,000 $637,000 Sales Tax - Criminal Justice $246,000 $178,000 $5,000 $429,000 Local Retail Sales Tax $107,000 $173,000 $79,000 $359,000 Utility Taxes (O&M) * $196,000 $135,000 $6,544 $337,544 Surface Water Fees $159,000 $116,000 $10,000 $285,000 Fines and Forfeits $106,000 $115,000 $6,000 $227,000 Building Permit Fees $121,000 $90,000 $7,000 $218,000 Vehicle License Fee - - - - Franchise Fees $102,000 $74,000 $2,000 $178,000 Solid Waste Revenues $41,000 $41,000 $1,000 $83,000 Development Services $39,000 $27,000 $1,000 $67,000 Fees Recreation Fees $23,000 $33,000 $500 $56,500 Zoning Fees $7,000 $5,000 $1,000 $13,000 Gambling Tax $13,000 - $16,000 $29,000 Business License Fees $4,000 $3,000 $1,000 $8,000 Total $2,476,000 $1,953,000 $168,044 $4,597,044 Revenues per Resident $201 $219 $646 $214 Source: ECONorthwest analysis. December 2003 56 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan Table 17. Operating Costs by Department by Potential Annexation Area (2003) Northeast Southeast PAA PAA Redondo Total City Council $26,000 $26,000 $1,000 $53,000 City Manager $193,000 $204,000 S 10,000 $407,000 Community Development $299,000 $22 I ,000 $13,300 $533,300 Law $129,000 $136,000 $6,000 $271,000 Management Services * $182,000 $187,000 $7,000 $376,000 Parks & Recreation $55,000 $406,000 $1,000 $462,000 Public Safety $1,651,000 $1,780,000 $98,000 $3,529,000 Public Works $1,457,000 $1,038,000 $21,000 $2,516,000 Total $3,992,000 $3,998,000 $157,300 $8,147,300 Costs per Resident $325 $449 $605 $380 Source: ECONorthwest analysis. Table 18. Annual Net Operating Revenues (or Operating Cost) of Annexation, by PAA (2003) Northeast Southeast PAA PAA Redondo Total $2,476,000 $1,953,000 Operating Revenues $168,044 $4,597,044 Operating Cost $3,992,000 $3,998,000 $157,300 $8,147,300 Net Revenues or Cost -$1,516,000 -$2,045,000 $10,344 * -$3,550,256 Costs oer Resident -$123 -$230 $41 -$166 Source: ECONorthwest analysis. * Given the uncertainties surrounding estimates of costs and revenues for a small area like Redondo, the reported net revenue of $1 0,344 for the Redondo area could be viewed as essentially equal to zero. Table 19 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Revenue to 2020 Capital Revenues Northeast Southeast Redondo AU Subareas Real Estate Excise Taxes $ 300,000 $ 222,000 $ 7,000 $ 530,000 Utility Taxes (Capital) 694,000 480,000 20,000 1,194,000 Annual Total $ 995,000 $ 702,000 $ 27,000 $1,724,000 CIP Planning Horizon (years 2002-2020) 18 18 18 18 2020 Total of Annual Revenue 17,910,000 12,636,000 486,000 31,032,000 December 2003 57 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Capital Revenues Northeast Southeast Redondo All Subareas Grants for Roads 1,000,000 0 0 I,OOG,OOO 2020 Revenue Total 18,910,000 12,636,000 486,000 32,032,000 Source: ECONorthwcst 2003 Table 20. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Estimated Future Capital Costs Redondo Area Wide Northeast Southeast East TOTAL Subarea Subarea Subarea Parks and Recreation $-0- $22,565,346 $9,564,412 $584,762 $32,714,520 Roads: Level of Service -0- 7,561,000 3,039,000 282,000 $ 1 0,882,000 Surface Water 1,067,000* 1,074,000 2,578,000 -0- $ 4,719,000 Total $1,067,000 $31,200,346 $15,181,412 $866,762 $48,315,520 Sources: Jones & Stokes, Henderson Young & Company, TetraTechlKCM, Inc., 2003 *Area wide capital programs include ajoint PAA stonn drain system inventory and comprehensive plan, and major maintenance of ditches and other stonnwater facilities. Table 21. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Estimated Net Capital Revenues Northeast Southeast Redondo Area Wide Subarea Subarea Subarea TOTAL Capital Revenue $18,910,000 $ I 2,636,000 $486,000 $ 32,032,000 Capital Cost 1,067,000 31,200,346 15,181,412 866,762 48,315,520 Net Revenue (1,067,000) (12,290,346) (2,545,412) (380,762) (16,283,520) Sources: ECONorthwest, Jones & Stokes, Henderson Young & Company, TetraTeehlKCM, Inc., 2003 Implementation Strategies To address the fiscal impact the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Annexation Feasibility Report, December 2003 identifies six categories of strategies that could be pursued to address the significant negative fiscal impacts of annexation, as follows, without a priority order: 1. State and County Support: With this option, the City could indicate that its ability to annex the Southeast and Northeast Subareas is contingent upon the State of Washington and/or King County providing new resources to offset the significant cost of such annexations. Examples could include a new local option sales tax per State Law that authorizes King County to submit such a tax for voter approval, State December 2003 58 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan grants, and unexpènded County impact fees being provided to the City. The County's ability to continue to service urban unincorporated islands has decreased over the last several years, and the County has been cutting back services. Accordingly, in August 2003, it was reported that King County will offer a total of $10 million to a number of cities that annex unincorporated areas in their P AAs. Details were not announced, and will depend on the County's budget decisions. 2. Local Taxpayers: With this option, the City could use one or more general taxes to have all taxpayers in Federal Way and the combined annexation area share in paying the annual operating deficit. The City could ask voters to approve long-term debt in the form of a general obligation bond that is used to build capital improvements. Of particular interest are enterprise funds. Like many cities, Federal Way has a policy that costs of enterprise funds, such as Surface Water Management and Solid Waste are to be covered by user fees. Such a strategy would require increased fees and/or decreased levels of services. Federal Way could increase user fees throughout the City and P AA for its stormwater utility and/or solid waste utility and use the proceeds to offset the increased cost of providing those services in the PAA. 3. Tax Base Expansion: A long-term strategy for Federal Way could be to increase City revenue by increasing the tax base in the P AA and/or in the City limits. Some businesses, like automobile dealerships, generate significantly more tax revenue than the cost of the public services they receive. These strategies could be pursued independently by the City of Federal Way, but King County could make annexation more attractive if it were to take the lead in rezoning selected parcels in the P AA in accordance with provisions of the approved Subarea Plan and assisting in the economic development strategies to develop those areas. A caveat would be that the City of Federal Way and the PAAs currently have vacant and underdeveloped land to absorb decades of anticipated commercial growth. 4. Special Districts: One strategy to generate revenue to pay for Federal Way's level of service in the annexation area would be to create a special district and charge a property tax levy in that district. Washington law allows the creation of limited special purpose districts for a number of purposes, such as roads, parks, transportation, and "local improvements." Voter approval is required to create special districts that have taxing authority. Property owner approval is required to create special districts that use special assessments. There is some risk associated with using special districts as a strategy to pay for providing urban levels of service the P AA. A vote on creating a special taxing district would occur subsequent to an annexation vote. If voters approve annexation, but do not approve the creation of the dístrict(s), the City December 2003 59 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan would be left with insufficient money to provide its level of service. 5. Reduced or Phased Levels of Service: Another way for the City to address the difference in levels of service between Federal Way and the County would be to permanently provide a lower level of service for one or more services, either broadly citywide or only within specific areas. A second strategy for addressing the difference in level of service would be to phase-in the increases in level of service in the annexation area. Phasing would reduce costs during the transition, and it would provide Federal Way with time to recruit and hire personnel and acquire facilities and equipment. However, eventually, phased levels of service will grow to equal the standards achieved by the City of Federal Way. When that occurs, service levels will be the same throughout the City, and the City will experience the full fiscal impacts of those levels of servIce. A variation on phased or reduced levels of service could include alternative service delivery strategies or customized strategies for specific neighborhoods tailored to the needs or characteristics of the PAA location. For example, crime prevention programs could vary by neighborhood depending on the type residential dwellings, commercial uses, and previous crime rate statistics. 6. Phased Annexation: This strategy would involve annexing those areas that are financially self-supporting first and then annexing other areas later, perhaps in co~unction with other strategies to improve fiscal impact of these subsequent annexations. Phased annexation based on fiscal impacts could be accomplished by annexing Redondo first because it has no operating cash deficit. The Northeast P AA subarea, or portions thereof, could be annexed next because its operating costs exceed revenues by 61 percent. Last to be annexed could be the Southeast P AA subarea, because its costs are estimated to be more than double the revenue it would generate (i.e., the deficit is 105 percent). Phasing can also be accomplished by smaller areas, such as community subareas. For example, if community subareas were annexed in order of their fiscal impact, from least to most net operating cost, the following would be the phasing sequence: Northlake, Lakeland, Star Lake, Jovita, Camelot, and Parkway. If other Implementation Strategies are considered and employed to determine phasing for annexation. the order might be different than the preceding list. It should be noted that phasing annexation emphasizes differences among the areas, and misses the opportunity to mitigate the apparent differences among areas by taking them all at the same time, thus effectively averaging the "highs" and "lows" of both revenues and costs. December 2003 60 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Some implementation strategies may be suitable to different portions of the P AA while others may not be. Study of the alternatives prior to or at the time of annexation requests would be warranted. 12.3 Services Unlikely to Change as a Result of Annexation: In the event of annexation, some services currently being provided in the P AA through special districts will not change. The current service providers, levels of service, or costs of services including fire protection, library, schools, water and wastewater will remain unchanged. However, it is important that the City and service providers coordinate planning efforts to match services and facilities with the current and future population and employment levels. Each of the services are summarized below based on the March 18,2002 PAA Inventory. Fire Services The Federal Way Fire Department provides service to the City of Federal Way and most of the surrounding unincorporated area in the Federal Way PAA. However, the Fire Department is not part of the City of Federal Way government. The Department was formed in 1980 from a series of mergers, which united several smaller fire districts in the area, some of which had been in existence since 1946. The resulting boundary encompasses some 34 square miles and has an estimated population of over 100,000. Services provided by the Federal Way Fire Department include fire suppression, fire prevention (building inspection and public information), emergency medical, and communications center operation for 9 I I emergency calls. Emergency medical response calls or service make up a majority of the calls for the Department. The PAA is served by four of the Department's six stations (Map VIII). One of these stations is located outside of the P AA, within the Redondo area. The other fire stations serving the P AA are located within the Lakeland and Camelot community subareas. The fire station in the Camelot area lies on the border of the Camelot and North Lake community sub areas. A 1996 Des Moines annexation (W oodmontJRedondo) could result in area currently served by the Federal Way Fire Department to be served by Fire District 26 if either party should give the required I 2-month notice to eliminate the contract allowing the Federal Way Fire Department to continue providing service. If the contract is eliminated, District 26 would take ownership of Station 66. The Federal Way Fire Department has purchased property at South 288th and Interstate 5 as a contingency should they need to replace Station 66. This would accommodate the building of a new station that is more centrally located in the north end of the City. This realignment of stations, response areas, and revenues would require closure of Station 65 (4966 South 298th). Both Stations 65 and 66 serve portions of the Federal Way PAA. December 2003 61 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan For the City and P AA Planning efforts, the City has worked closely with the Department in reviewing the Fire District Master Plan, which complies with the GMA. The Department's Master Plan identifies the new facilities the Department will need to continue providing service as its service area grows. The City included the Department's new facilities requirements and cost and revenue estimates in the City's Capital Facilities chapter. library Services Library services are provided by King County. There are no public libraries inside the P AA, but there are six libraries of different sizes serving residents of the P AA including: Algona-Pacific Library - 5,250 square feet (medium) 255 Ellingson Road Auburn Library- 15,000 square feet (resource) 1102 Auburn Way South Federal Way 320th Library- 10,000 square feet (large) 848 S. 320th St. Federal Way Regional Library - 25,000 square feet (regional) 34200 1st Way S. Kent Regional - 22,500 square feet (regional) 212 2nd Avenue N. Woodmont Library - 5,250 square feet (medium) 26809 Pacific Highway South King County Library System (KCLS) plans for capital projects, including expansions, depend on the KCLS Board determining whether they wish to propose a bond issue to King County voters and whether it passes. The KCLS staff and Board have discussed many possible projects for such a bond issue and some of the libraries serving the P AA have been included. However, there are no capital plans or funds to provide library services in the P AA at this time. Schools/Education Probably more than any other special district, a school district provides an area with a sense of community. The Federal Way School District #210 (as outlined on Map XIV) extends from the county line south to South 252nd west of 1-5 and South 232nd Street, east of 1-5 to the north, and for the most part along the edge of the plateau to the east. A school district provides a common thread, be it through school activities such as organized sports, or through voting during elections. City staff meets regularly with School District #210 administrators to discuss December 2003 62 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan growth management and school development issues. The District primarily serves students in the Cities of Federal Way, Des Moines, and Kent, and unincorporated King County. The District administration has indicated in these meetings that they would prefer to work with one jurisdiction as the District attempts to anticipate growth and develop plans for new school facilities. Seven schools are located in the P AA, including five elementary schools, one junior high school, and one high school (as outlined on Map XIV). Aside from Thomas Jefferson High School, all schools within and serving the P AA have some student demand beyond the building capacity, requiring the use of portable classrooms. Water and Wastewater The Lakehaven Utility District and Highline Water District provide water service to properties within the P AA. As indicated on Map XV, the current Lakehaven Utility District boundary is generally bordered on the south by the Pierce/King County line, on the east by the Green River Valley, and on the west by Puget Sound. The Lakehaven Utility District's northern boundary is generally bordered by South 272nd Street with a narrow strip extending along Puget Sound to South 252nd Street. Maps contained in the Lakehaven District's water system comprehensive plan describe an extensive system of wells, storage tanks, and distribution mains. The water distribution infrastructure is sufficient to provide water to virtually all of the Lakehaven Utility District. The Highline Water District water service area boundary encompasses most of the PAA Star Lake community subarea and parts of the City of Federal Way (Map XV). Both the 1998 Lakehaven Utility District Comprehensive Water System Plan and 2002 Highline Water District Capital Improvement Plan have identified the following water quality and service goals and objectives: maintain their water systems and water quality to the highest level of service and at least the level required by applicable regulations; participate in the conservation efforts to maximize existing water supply resources and develop new water resources; and install new water distribution systems as necessary to serve the existing and future populations within their Districts. Both Districts have existing rate structures and capability to ensure this level of service. Wastewater systems in the P AA include both septic and sanitary sewer systems. Sanitary sewer service is available in several areas outside the City limits including the Camelot/ Star Lake area, north of Lake Dolloff, Redondo, Woodmont, a small area east ofl-5 and south of Kitts Corner Road, and portions of the Weyerhaeuser Corporate campus east of 1-5. See Map XVI. Relevant to the PAA, the Lakehaven Utility District plans estimate that sewer December 2003 63 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan service will be extended to the east-central area of the District in the near future and the area is projected to reach its target population in the Year 2007, based on the Lakehaven Sewer Master Plan which estimated growth based upon City of Federal Way traffic analysis zone growth projections available in approximately 1999. The number of onsite septic systems throughout the District was estimated to be 7,500. The Utility District plan assumptions are that 50 percent of the onsite systems will be replaced with sanitary sewer connections by the year 20 17. Under ultimate development conditions, it is anticipated that all areas that could feasibly and economically be served would be served. The City of Federal Way's responsibility with regard to the water and wastewater systems will be limited to updating the FWCP in future years in accordance with the City's regular planning efforts, and providing development applications to the Lakehaven Utility District and Highline Water District for their input as part of the City's Development Review Committee process. 12.4 Public Services and Capital Facilities Goals and Policies The provision of public services and capital facilities would be guided by the following goal and policies. Public Services and Capital Facilities Goal Provide effective, efficient, and quality capital facilities and services at the level necessary to meet community needs and support allowed growth. Public Services and Capital Facilities Policies In addition to Governance and Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, the following policies are proposed: P AA CapFac - 1 Prior to annexation, the City; in conjunction with King County, should develop and maintain an inventory of capital facilities in the P AA. As new information becomes available, supplementary inventories should be completed for surface water facilities and roadway improvements to bridge gaps in information identified in the Final Potential Annexation Area Inventory. City of Federal Way, March 18. 2002. P AA CapFac - 2 City and County plans should address the P AA to ensure that systems are reviewed comprehensively, and in order to support desired annexation phasing. P AA CapFac - 3 Through an interlocal agreement prior to annexation, shared City-County capital facility maintenance standards should be implemented. Standards, funding, and practices should seek to avoid maintenance deferrals prior to annexation. Maintenance standards should be consistent with approved functional plans for transportation, stormwater, parks, and other systems that would become a part of the City system upon annexation. December 2003 64 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan P AA CapFac - 4 The City should allow for a variety of service delivery or revenue enhancement optionsto increase the feasibility of annexation. Based on the PAA Annexation Feasibility StULÚ', these options may include, but are not limited to: a. State of Washington and/or King County providing new resources to offseuhe significant cost of annexation, through such options as New Local Option Sales Tax, State Grants, unspent County Impact Fees, County monetary incentives to annex, or others. b. The County or City posing to voters general obligation bonds or general taxes. c. The County or City proposing to create special limited districts in P AAs to pay for specific costs. d. Tax base expansion per Policy LU-6. e. Increase in fees for enterprise funds such as surface water management or the solid waste program. f. When considering annexation proposals, the City could provide a lower level of service for one or more services. The reduction could be City-wide (e.g. lower park standards) or just in the PAAs (e.g. lower roadway pavement rating in the newly annexed neighborhoods). g. When considering annexation proposals, the City could explore alternative service delivery strategies or customized strategies for specific neighborhoods tailored to the needs or characteristics of the P AA location. h. The City could address the difference in County and City levels of service by phasing-in the increases in level of service in the annexation area. 1. The City could annex those areas that are financially self-supporting first and then annex other areas in conjunction with other strategies to improve fiscal impact of these subsequent annexations, such as identified in "a" to "h" above. P AA CapFac-5 To avoid City assumption of nonconforming infrastructure, a coordinated Capital Improvement Program should be prepared between the City and County. Such a program should be developed prior to annexation, particularly of the Northeast and Southeast subareas, to ensure that improvements required to meet levels of service are implemented concurrent with new development. When considering annexation proposals that have significant existing nonconforming infrastructure, the City should consider service delivery and revenue enhancement options identified in Policy P AA CapFac-4. December 2003 65 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 13 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GMA requires public participation in the adoption and amendment of Comprehensive Plans and Development Regulations, including the preparation of Subarea Plans like the Federal Way P AA Subarea Plan. Public participation efforts in the development of the Federal Way PAA Subarea Plan are addressed in prior sections of this report, and have included public meetings, open houses, and various means of advertisements. Once adopted, the approved P AA Subarea Plan will require some implementing activities including interlocal agreements, and additional capital planning. Implementing activities depending on the nature of the activity may result in additional opportunities for public input in accordance with State and local laws. Also, if the Subarea Plan is amended in the future which is allowed typically on an annual basis by the GMA, other public participation efforts would be needed. Finally, the annexation process would require public notification and participation efforts pursuant to State laws. 13.1 Public Participation Goal and Policies The following goal and policy would help direct public participation efforts in the PAA. Public Participation Goal Actively seek public involvement in P AA planning efforts. Public Participation Policy P AA Pub - 1 Consistent with Washington State law, the City of Federal Way recognizes annexation as a process which requires and benefits from public participation. As the City is the designated future municipal service provider to the P AA, the City should inform P AA residents, property owners, and business owners of City activities and invite participation from P AA residents, property owners, and business owners through the following efforts: a. Encourage City staff and elected officials to regularly attend civic and community organization meetings. b. Seek broad representation on boards, commlSSlOns, and advisory groups. c. Prior to action on City plans and regulations, seek and integrate public input through public workshops, meetings and hearings. December 2003 66 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 14 GOVERNANCE AND INTER-JURISDICTIONAL COORDINATION In accordance with the provisions of the GMA, new development should occur in designated urban growth areas, and urban services should primarily be provided by cities. In consultation with the County, a P AA for Federal Way has been designated in which it is anticipated that the City would ultimately provide services as property owners and citizens elect to annex. This wi]] require a transition from County governance to City governance. Additionally, GMA requires coordination between land use and services/capital planning, such as between the City of Federal Way, neighboring cities, special districts and the County, for which the Countywide Planning Policies help provide a regional framework. While some servic~ providers would not change, such as special districts including the Lakehaven Utility District, Highline Water District, Federal Way Fire Department, and Federal Way School District, other services provided by the County including police and coITections services, surface water management, land use and building permitting, human services, and others would change. (A comparison of services and levels of service between the two agencies is identified in Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis. July 11, 2003; a detailed discussion of fiscal impacts is found in the Annexation Feasibility Study, December 2003.) Section 12 provides strategies to minimize negative impacts to public services and facilities impacted negatively by annexation. 14.1 Governance/lnterjurisdictional Goals and Policies Governance and interjurisdictional coordination would be directed by the following goal and policies. Governance/lnterjurisdictional Coordination Goal Coordinate PAA planning efforts with other neighboring jurisdictions and agencIes. Governance/lnterjurisdictional Coordination Policies P AA Gov - 1 The City shall coordinate with King County to ensure service provision and land development prior to City annexation is consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan. Methods to allow for coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and King County to: a. Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees, and SEP A mitigation consistent with the PAA Subarea Plan; and December 2003 67 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan b. Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards, and capital facility implementation consistent with the P AA Subarea Plan. P AA Gov - 2 Through regional planning efforts, the County and City should ensure P AA plans are compatible with neighboring jurisdictions, including K.ing and Pierce Counties, and the Cities of Algona, Auburn, Edgewood, Kent, Milton, and Pacific. P AA Gov - 3 Coordinated planning efforts between the City, County, Lakehaven Utility District, Highline Water District, Puget Sound Energy, Federal Way School District and Federal Way Fire Department should continue to assure managed growth supportive of the P AA land use, annexation phasing, and service delivery objectives. 15 ANNEXATION For purposes of efficient services, coordinated land planning and development, and unity between economically and socially related areas, annexation may be desired by citizens, property owners, and the City. As noted above, the GMA provides for coordinated urban growth area planning between counties and cities with the intent that urban and urbanizing areas ultimately be served by municipalities. In the GMA framework, annexations may occur only within a jurisdiction's designated P AA. By addressing its city limits and P AA in its Comprehensive Plan, the City is responding to the GMA framework to manage growth, provide efficient services, and meet community needs in the broader Federal Way community. There are currently four methods of annexation applicable to the Federal Way PAA. . The Election Method, Initiated by Ten Percent Petition, is initiated by the collection of signatures from qualified electors in the area proposed for annexation equal to ten percent of the number of voters in the last general election in that area. This method would require an election by the residents of the area being considered for annexation. This method could be used to annex portions of or all of the P AA at a time. The Election Method, Initiated by Resolution, may be initiated by City Council resolution. This method would require an election by the residents of the area being considered for annexation. This method could be used to annex portions of or all of the P AA at a time. . December 2003 68 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan . In May 2003, legislation became effective which adopted a new "Petition Method of Annexation" designed to overcome the State Supreme Court's findings of constitutional defects in the State's previous petition method. Under the new law, the annexation petition must be signed by property owners (owning a majority of the area) and by registered voters (a majority in the area). If there are no registered voters (vacant, commercial, or industrial property, or property that has residents but no registered voters), then only owners of a majority of the area need sign. This method could be used to annex portions of or all of the P AA at a time. In July 2003, another "Island Method of Annexation" became effective. It allows a legislative body to initiate an annexation process for an urban island of territory by adopting a resolution commencing negotiations for an interlocal agreement between the initiating city and the county. At least 60 percent of the is land must be contiguous to one or more cities. A public hearing is required by the county and the city separately or jointly, before the agreement is executed. Following adoption and execution of the agreement by both legislative bodies, the city legislative body is to adopt an ordinance providing for the annexation of the territory described in the agreement. Generally, a petition or public vote is not required. The method has a vote requirement if property owners reject annexation through obtaining a certain number of petition signatures. This Island method could be used to annex all of the Redondo East, and/or all of the Northeast and Southeast P AAs as a whole. It may be possible to use the Island method to annex portions of the Major Subareas. . As identified in Section 12, no individual strategy or combination of strategies will make annexation feasible for the Major or Community Level Subareas (other than Redondo), without significant sacrifices or costs to the City in the form of reduced levels of service or financial impacts to citizens. Annexation of smaller areas involve portions of the cost of the entire P AA; therefore requests for small area annexations should be reviewed in the context of the annexation strategies and policies in Section 12, as well as the policies below. 15.1 Annexation Goals and Policies Annexation Goals Provide a framework for processing annexation requests. Annexation Policies P AA Annex - 1 The City should give priority consideration to annexation proposals that are financially self-sufficient or those where the fiscal impact can be improved through annexation strategies such as those identified in Policy P AA CapFac-4. As areas become feasible for annexation, such areas may be prioritized for annexation in accordance with the following: December 2003 69 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan a. Priority criteria should include: . Neighborhood willingness to annex; Land use developability where urban densities may be achieved, rate of growth indicating City oversight of growing area would ensure compatible development with City goals and requirements, and other similar land use factors; Ability to provide a b"alance in costs and revenues to the City; City's ability to provide appropriate levels of service; . . . . The annexation include~eas with regionally serving infrastructure that meets City of Federal Way Level-of-Service (LOS) standards. Infrastructure examples may include parks and recreation facilities, arterial roadways, regional surface water detention facilities, etc. Annexation areas containing nonconfonning infrastructure should have sufficient planning and funding mechanisms in place to assure existing LOS deficiencies are addressed. Sufficient planning mechanisms may include affected areas being addressed in capital facility plans. Sufficient funding mechanisms may include anticipated utility tax revenues from the affected area, and the establishment of a Local Improvement District to minimize any gaps in tax revenues. Logical and reasonable service areas based on Policies P AA Annex -2 and PAA Annex-3. . b. Annexation of the geographic subareas may be phased over several years. P AA Annex - 2 The City should process annexation requests in accordance with review criteria. Review criteria should include: a. The proposal meets the priority criteria of P AA Annex - 1. b. Annexations are an appropriate size. Appropriate size means an area that warrants the staff time and expense involved in processing annexation requests and complies with the goals of the GMA and the CWPPs. c. Annexations generally should not have or create abnonnally irregular boundaries. d. The annexation must, to the greatest extent possible, preserve natural neighborhoods and communities. e. The annexation proposal should use physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours, including meeting provisions ofPAA Annex-3; December 2003 70 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan f. The annexation proposal should create and/or preserve logical service areas, including meeting provisions of P AA Annex -3. P AA Annex 3: The City will use, but may not be limited to, the following factors in determining the specific location of an annexation proposal boundary: a. The annexation boundary, where appropriate, should adjust any impractical or irregular boundaries created in the past. b. The annexation boundary should provide a contiguous and regular boundary with current City limits. c. The annexation boundary, where appropriate, should be drawn along property and/or existing or future right-of-way boundaries. Annexation boundaries, where possible, should not be drawn along right-of-way centerlines. d. P AA roadways contiguous to a proposed annexation area should not be included within the proposed annexation boundary, unless the roadways are contiguous to current City limits. e. When a proposed annexation is located in the vicinity of a P AA King County surface water management facility, the City Public Works Department should evaluate the facility and the water basins it serves to determine whether the boundary should be modified to include the public facility. f. When a proposed annexation is located in the vicinity of a P AA public recreation facility, the City Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department should evaluate the financial feasibility of modifying the annexation boundary to include the public facility. g. When a proposed annexation includes portions of a natural lake, the annexation boundary should be modified to include or exclude the entire lake area from the proposed annexation. h. When a proposed annexation is located in the vicinity of a P AA special purpose district facility (i.e. school, fire station, etc.), the City should consult with the respective district regarding modifying the boundary to include the special purpose district facility. P AA Annex - 4 Upon annexation, properties shall be required to assume FWCP designations and zoning as found in the adopted P AA Subarea Plan (Maps VII-l and VII-2). a. The adopting ordinance for the pre-annexation plan and zoning shall specify the time interval following an annexation during which the ordinance adopting the pre-annexation plan and zoning, must remain in effect before it may be amended by the City. December 2003 71 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan b. Any amendment to the pre-annexation land use plan that is adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan is subject to the general GMA limitation that the comprehensive plan may be amended no more frequently than once a year, unless exceptions are met. P AA Annex - 5 Where appropriate, the City and/or County should allow development agreements in the P AA that me consistent with the approved Subarea Plan. P AA Annex - 6 The City will require owners ofland annexing into Federal Way to assume their proportion of existing City bonded indebtedness. P AA Annex - 7 The City and County will work with affected neighborhoods upon annexation to provide a smooth transition from King County to City of Federal Way administration. P AA Annex - 8 The City should establish departmental service needs prior to major annexations through a fiscal impact analysis. As revenues from each annexation area are collected, increase City services to maintain current citywide levels of service or determine other level of service phasing, reduction, or customization as identified in Policy P AA CapFac-4. P AA Annex - 9 The City should evaluate the unincorporated lands beyond the P AA boundaries, including but not limited to, the Browns Point and Dash Point areas of Pierce County and the southwest King County "gap" area, that may be appropriate to include within the P AA. The City should work with King County and Pierce County and neighboring jurisdictions regarding the potential addition of any lands to the Federal Way PAA. 16 TECHNICAL REFERENCES TO THE SUBAREA PLAN The following technical references are available under separate cover: A. City oj' Federal Way Potential Annexation Area [nventOlY, Final, March 18, 2002. B. "Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis," July 11,2003. C. "Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Land Use Analysis Compilation," March 5, 2003. D. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Annexation Feasibility Stll(~V, December 2003. December 2003 72 ~-~..., --- ~ ) ~:Fr7 c-> Ii I -~-~f-- , . ---- I Auburn i ! _u - -t---.--l, >OJ -.of \ t I'vo, J. .J 1 - , 1 , J . ! , ; . '..r .~ :II: ti j I i I: I;-~" r~\ - -.--.- City of Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Federal Way PAA Legend: D Federal Way D Algona D Auburn D Des Moines D Kant D Milton D Pacific D D D D Kent, P.A.A. D D Federal Way, P AA. Algona, PAA Auburn, PAA Milton, PAA. Pacific, PAA. Vicinity Map 0 Scale: 1/2 Mile t\ N ~ Map Date: December, 2003 City at Federal W~, 33S3D First Wæ¡ S, FedaraiWay. WA 9&003 (258) 6&1-4000 VMW .ci.fedaral-way.wa.us Please Nots: This map Isll1tBnd8d fDr use u a graphical rtpresentallon ONLY. The City of Federal Wæ¡ makec no warranty as to itB 1cc1nCý. A Fëderal Way Map I -Jra ba'p881dac41gel'rnllp.Mrl City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Community Level Su barea Boundaries Legend: Potential Ann8X8ÖOn Area - Community Level Subareas: D Redondo East (Redor'Ido East) 0 StIr Lake (Northeast) 0 Camelot (Northeast) D North Lake (Northeast) 0 Jovita (Southeast) D ~k8land (South'lat) 0 Parkway (Sou1heast) Other Areas: 0 Incorporated Area 0 Unincorporalad Area Source: City 01 Federal Way. GIS Di\lision & De partrnent of Community Development Services, BWR, ECONol1hwe8l, PM SlBerlng Committee. December 2001 VIcinity Map Scale: 0 1f¿ Mile ~ N ~ Map Dale: Decembtr, 20D3 CIty of Feden! W~. 33580 FII'8I WWf S, Federal Way, WA 91003 (258) e61~QOO WNN.d .federal -w.-¡ .wa.us Please NolB: This map IBIn1endllld for use as a graphlc:aJ repreBentallon ONLY. The City of Federal Wæ¡ makec no warranty as to ill arotnG'f. Â Federal Way Map II JIn~"-p....1 City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area I Sensitive Areas LlIglll1d: . Labhaven lJIIlIty Dldrtct Well . PrivaIø Willi (All Use¡, In Use and Unused) BlullfG~ Heron Breeång Na&I N Streams t / Anadromous Ash Runs Rlllidønt Fish Pflllìsnt "J Rlpartan AnIaS it Urban Natural Open Spaoe AI Waler Fowl ..N Deep Aquifer Eutom Upland Aquifer . .lv Radondo '. Milton Channlll Aquifer ..N PJlrror Lake AQlMar Succeptibilitv to GroLlllifntar Contamnalioo - Medium Serwitivity SusC8p6bilitvto GroLlllifntar Contamnalioo- High SenslllvIIV 100 Yaar FloociJlain Wetlands Sou~: KIng Coumy GIS Center, December 2001 , CIty of Federal WIJ/ Co~rehon'lvo PIli!, 2000, LaJéehaven UUIlty Dldrtct, 2002 Shllldon and Anoddlls, Apñl 2002 and State of W~"'nlf!Cn This document II not a substitute for a 1'1111 clslnay. ADDITIONAL SENSInVE AREAS MAY EXIST. CL «II :::E b ~ u 5 Scale: 0 1n Mile Nota: Wødandc and &trearm; ~ were IdentlfttMIln a 1998 CI~federal Way IIu . Wildlife N habIIaI allan comec from tile Stzte of Washlnglnn PlweNa18: This map Is IntendtMI for use 18 a graphical npr.entlllon ONlY. The Cltyóf Federal Wøy maJœs no wamnty 1& to ita ílŒuracy. ~ ~ Dale: Decembtr, 2ODS City of Fedel'll W.¡, 33&0 First Wæ( S, FtMleral Wøy. WA SI003 (258) 681-4000 WNN.c:i,fedOral-wlY.wa.us AFëderalWay Map III .A8.~..ml I ,It ~ I I r ~ vr ~ - IAØ . - \ \~ I~ IE u ¡ - - LII:. \a: . ff-J ~ 41iPJ,RH If? . I~.~'D ~ i I [2, 9tri~Hj p-- ' I ~\\Y/ ' ~~.i~.-!~W'--"!i'l r:::.~= ti - 'I ¡ .¡b-"-:7J ~ . == , ,-/liUJ::::;:Y' j Id I 'h -\~u . elQ ~ JP1 h '/ r;?r;/É . ' ~ ¿j L':i1m~LJ' '~D W,.,~.~ !~1. 1 . . rI W ay ?~ . n1îilTh ~y j "r- r-. )Y iL . tcJ.: 1 VJ ~ " ; Uk. :;7 ~:r:rR=C If . T i . .'VLJr >r biê h r::;f-J !rfl~ ~ \: L~]TTTTT,gl olTlJ-" ~-~, '---r1~~ 7 \'l ~, I I rll \'=1". .' :i6fMW.~i '" " ' ~ Jr19E=~ (- ',//1¡L / -li.i'ljYä!~~ "/ /-o1~~ì = I ~ifl~ÞJ pf~'~ I ~:f[ ;.'~¡'"~'~~.~ I;~J !\ " lc ,~ h" I' I~~ - Ég;c- i ~ 1 ~'~~ g ) ~ ~ ~ .. :--- . - , r =~~~ ~ I III 11/ ~ ~ ì ~~ Ð- . .~ ~~ " >,\1 " ~iS WJ -JI' I ö15J " ~ = , f- .\J '-~ . . LJJ Pi -=-:.... ~ 0=:' D~!-'>..-- )~ ~ Æj~ Ilfrl I lJT]W .. II I !I ¡VI b ~ 81 n ..- L Ii ,~ ' H ì- c.jH, I ' '1 ----1 T '1-1- .1 fJJ 1111 i==\I '~ ~ "') 'l.z,' ,'::'J! -.,;p '" / >- 'J JJ:. ~, ~ ~ i'D' City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Geologic Hazards .. Legend: ISSJ Land&lidll Hazard Area& Eroalon Hazard Artaø (Thera are NO coalll'Îne hazard& or sllÏcmic hazards in this araa.) Potential Ann8XltiDn Aroa- Comm L81 ity LlIVel S u!weas: D Redondo Em (Redondo East) D Star Laka (Norlf1ea&f;) D Camelot (Northeast) D Norlf1 LakII (Northea&t) D Jovita (Southeast) D LaJœIand (Southeast) D Par1<way (SouUte~ OIf1er Araas: D IncorpDlõÍ8dArea D Unlncorpora1ed Area Souroe: King Courrty GIS Contor, Doœrnbor2DC1 This document Is nat a substitute for a field survey. ADOITIONAL SENSITIVE AREAS MAY EXIST. 0.. .... ::E b ¡;;; 0:.> 5 ., Scale: 0 1/2 Mile t\ N , ~ 1"- i Map Data: December. 2003 Please No18: City of Federal W 11/, Thl8 map Is Intendad for U8e 33S30 First W3If S, as a graphical "presentation Faderal Wr¡. WA 9&003 ONLY. The CIty of Federal (258) 681-4000 Wr¡ malœs no warranty WNN.å.fedltr;¡(-wI'j.wa.ua as to ita m;uracy. A Fëdaral Way Map IV ../UIonAn blfll8/dac4.'atl1'&lIl Figure V Potential Annexation Area 2002 Existing land Use Distribution (Based on Total Acres) 158.8 73.2 30.6 . Commercial 13 Easements iii Industrial 13 No Data 0 Office Ii Open Space Common Areas & Drainage [ji Public Park . Quasi-Public . Recreation 0 Residential. Multi-Family 13 Residential, Single-Family 13 Rights-at-Way . Utilities 0 Vacant 0 Water 1\ \-l ¡ I I I: I. (1:1 I J.--L I 'J I I(\,\ ~ r 1(, ¡ 1:. ~ I J.J- I ~ ~,,----lp 'J ~ --- r::: y DISIr] ",. I~ ~~i I h."'----' ~ Moln ~. L.- - 1l.Lr\ I' I--' ~ ,'\Lf.,- . ~te ~ ) Æ. ..-;I!!!~ aLL 1\ L=~ . ~ ~~t~~.~~ ~ . .~"'irIl L ~~~ ~-"- ~)Tf- & R\):~ J ~ IL ß ~ '" t ~ ~ tj'ý ~- -À I- t}- . ~ ~y ~J- -y,"' ì ~ ~ 89ì I' 1--"\ ? . ~ Q ~ }- Y . . r I ~ I ! -r :Yr '[-1 ~ I ~~ ~ -' n' '~ -'!l:: r ( I ~ I ~ ~ .c, iD 'r- ~/ ;ç1 ---c -/-¡ J I - /\ I .-- ] ~. I -I ~'UU '- i 7 rr ":: .' ! -! me t -- I ......'~ . ,.jl ø --r- ~ . 1Ti73'~, I. .~ I Auburn ~ I ~ >- T I l ~ -~I f rr i ~Ir< ~ J9 -.....:... I 1- ~ J., rr/ \. I \ I / /J. I A. . f--- ( .= ='" . U ~ I = ~""'tl.<. \ e- ...J , ¡--- . ~~ , I-- Q'~:ra -/ .1 ~ a ~ ~&. .YH~,:t!- ~--1~o~ -fM';'\. -l\f r-ï7 ii' ~J ~~ - --! I 1 U I I II ~ :: Ì\ otii ~ f- - J -þ ~ l~ø,:I.. I-L . --' r- - ( I.. -l.... ,u I ~~ .- i 7 ~ , ~)O" I 18 ft.1 t r-- ¡--- 0 \J ~ -. f---- I I ' I -I Fr .: rt ~ ) - I ~ i ~ , / LJ Þ "~'. .~=,~ n I ! I ~ \J < \.. '. I i ~~ ~ , . '" 1'-, '1"'0 ~,~' '" - ..,.,a \-). r rh\ ( I Iovita g 99 I' II N )-l .; 1 . ~n~rJ r,_-=: :~ 1i'~ -~~ ~ 'I( <f /Q/ ';( Ð ,q;¡ II cItIC18 w/ t , 'j A Ii II ~ '------- ~ sl f--- I I I Milo. /IT'i:i ffi-"" ....- ~7 ~ - , " City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Parks & Cu Itu ral Resou rces LogOl1d: RecreiltlonaJ Fac111les: (J Ashlng kt-. We Geneva CD Fishing Ace_. Lake Killamey ø Federal Wzy Sailor CentBr ø Norlf1 La/œ Impl'DVllment Club Cultural R.oun:es 0 Fancher House Ð Suther1and's Gas Statlan and Grocery 0 Westborg HOU88 Comml.l1lty Level Subll8a Boundary . Public Pari< D InoorporatedArA D Unincorponl:8d Area Sourœ: City of Fedora! Wæ¡ GIS, KIng COl.l1ty Deputment at Natural Recoul'C8s, December 2001, Federal Wzy Sanior ClII1te!\ February 2002 and Stale at WunnJft1n. Department of Ash and Wllcllfe, February, 2002 Q, <'IS ::E b c::: u > Scale: ~ 0 1fl Mile ~ N Map Dale: Decllf'llbtr, 2003 Please Nota: ~ at Fed.hI W~, Till. map Is Intended for U8Ø 0 FIr8t W~ 50 18 a ~caI npr98ent:ltlon Federal W~. A 81003 ONL. Cllyd Federal (258) 6&1 000 W~ maIœs no warranty WNN Ii ,fedaral-way.wa.u8 1& D ill accurac;y. ÂfedaraiWay Map VI ~~-- ~ ~ @ r--.-. . I Pultll I ' I . I MinoR .;--- ~",I I I I . I Auburn . I '-I .. -... , I , J , I City of Federal Way- Potential Annexation Area Federal Way P AA Pre-Annexation Comprehensive Plan Designations Leglll1d: . Commll1itY Busine&6 @ill MuIU Family . Neigl-Gorhood BUGin- . ParkJ and Open Space ~ O1IIð&Parlc D Slngl& FamIy, Meclum Density D Singlll FarriIy, ligh DlII1lity Source: City of Fed&rll Wq ca. <'II == b I: U 5 Scale: ~ 0 112 Mile ~ N Map Dale: Decllntbtr, 2003 PIweNcrta: ~ of Federal Wwf, Till. map Is Intended for UIØ 0 ARt W:t S, as a "hleal npr88entat1on Federal W~. A 9&003 ONL. e CIty or Federal (258) 6&1 000 W?C maJœc no warranty WMW.d.fed&raI~.wa.u8 18 0 ita m:uracy. A Fëdaral Way Map VII-1 ..11. IIIMIcIt/þoIIdoc4I\"....1 1 ~ 2Ih ST C§ r--.-. . I Pacltll . . I I I MinoR ,;--- \..... I ---- . I . I Aubum . I ,-. "'I -... , I , I . I . ." ... . City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Federal Way Pre-Annexation Zoning Map lIgll1d: . BC (Ccmmunty Bu 81 n 061) [8 BN (Naighborhood Buainllla) . OP (Office Part) D RSS5.0 (1 UnltJ35,1X10 Sf) D RS8.11 (1 UnMl,IIOO Sf} D RS7.2 (1 Unlb7,200 Sf} D R85.o (1 UnitJ5.000 8f) ~ RM3eDO (1 Unlll36OO S~ D flM2.4DO <1 Unlt/2400 Sf') . RM18DO (1 UnltttlOO SF) Sourœ: Cnv at Federal Wf:! Co ... ::E b c:;:: u 5 Scale: ~ 0 1/2 Mile ~ N Map Dale: December, 2003 PlaaseNo1B: ~af Federal W~. Tille map Is Intended for Ulil 0 Firat W:t S, 18 a ~caI npr88entrtfon Federal W~ A 911003 ONL. e CIty or Fede raI (258) 681 00 W'l malœs no warranty w.wt.ci .f8doral-w.y .wa.ua as 0 illl aŒuracv. A Federa. Way Map VII-2 . .Aa......~_..MIt \ ~ I! I ¡;: " 6T ( I I .l.-LI, T I' J : [\- \ \... \.'.\ } d 'c ¡ £ If ~ i ~I ,I LLL I ~,. \ l\ ' rl ~ .) ("" ¡,~. : ~~::""~~ ~.; . ~D " j '\ \ ~ /r; I .J4;I." IS ~ ,;;)--{ . h. '<: J ' MOln~ .. $1. I R- - ill , . ~ 'ftf'J I f-- It ~- ~' ~l j I . l.J 'l ~ J'-. .;' [:::: r- / .. "'- r .1"'1 r~.... L (- \ ~,-' e:¡~. ~q 1\ -~.: ~I~ \ I =j , /~,.,. ~-=~ If r- ~, \-- ~u I I ,.j ~ , \ \-J I u--.u ! / ' ~ L L ~,' I 1- I ,I :,' r 1\ i~JTr ~ R1 ~ '-'. I )j./W' - 1-'" 1 ../ "'- '-l i' \ ' I ~ ; ~ ~g-- ---;.= )j/U ~ -j. 1- ~ - ~ \ \ l--- ' , ). " :., ~ \ ) -L / '-'- I. :I II: ,,( ~l, '~n \", 'i~'\ ~ i~~~ '- ..' ~ /~ ~ ~~ ~,'-~.7,'", ' " ,... /",l,,', I ¡, rl",~ <'l", ~'",eJ..,7rr".,."..,crr::=1,'f1r, ~" '~~ Î, $,,',"1 ~ ' ,~ I --L l I ~ -\ ,-:rJ (~:.,. ~ ì ,:' '~Q -~I! I ---..:\-- -----, ~.' , ,q", -'~-' '. ,I ,g B s~~ I ilÏ$ ~~jã~' ~ ~ Y~_l r\ I ~, f-h, i ¡ 1/--" ~"I/ '}"-P~ .:.,~~~' , .----J ~,p:Ll-~~~:: ,; ~ ~ J¡- 1.Jl!r- ~ii Tl ~- i ~ Y1i -~-Ií) R ~I ;s6tJSTI d L/ f- ,,' ¡~ekJ~} --! ~J ì ~Z// :' Ii', ,¡'-\e" 'I ;¡ I Aubum / -~¡-----~ , , - """t..=~, ,\,-1 rI. , i I --,~- ¡ f---- I I :::::, I --/,-~-n ~,-=r I -J~l /,.i. r- " ~ I~LL ',1, LI' j" ---J JL;T r¡! ~ ¡ I i P--L ST ~ /. -, ~.4" ::\\ I /-¡ ¡ ~Ø,( J I~'~! --¡ ~~.. EJ. _J x,' -,~i" c:c.,'(ì" rrhdfJ,ra,r- ,~i~:,~ /' I I L r' "-- ", ;;:J--i I W ~-, --- r-I ~ / r ~I \Î . '-, L~,' f#!ij,/"-'-- I ,/ r~ u" - ,-::z, I "--.' ! J é" ' 0 'fa'" 'i ~/ '1- ~ -' ',' '--I I I r' /:!! /,' - I-- - I ,.-( 'n L LJ I' I ~~ ¡¡ \,: I ~b orlh ~ ~ ' ! »<,'. þ! '$ )@~ke> ~ ' J \-- ! ' ,,'.} li,U,Uf, I I 11/fr1 I: "",~ ~,. I 7. ') ~ ~ P, ij)\(~ : ,', )]-H~ ~-_. 0 ~ f ( ¡ ',jf--=t-¡ J -:-~ ! ~," ,'lli,'1 " -----'í----¡ , ! : " r+~---rJ.J , I i r¡ ,.. VI J,,;4- /- L.~riiF ¡ d ,r I ì LJ ' , r-- ! ~~IU1 r--1 ' I ~~~ ~,1 ~~ ~! .. ~ /1, V ' i (1- I¡ o~ita ", . -T---~:----": ,~~ è--e}l' ,', .,:,: "" ",..], '11,__',', I , ¡ ,~ r,~ iÃ ' ,...' 'iI ,'i >- , ~,e---yll'" ;-'1" I "f¡,~, ,I , : J~ : / / \\.-1 -,>-- _..../. ( I" /1' /' I,"f!/ ~, (--,t ~,J'~',,~A~, I!~.,:~,i:_'~ " > ~ !~ ~--.:_,- ",' ' ! 1\'" "- 'I ' ----,-, 'i! -, I "-D L4' LLJ' ì"---- ' ,/( I-' r- I' , ' r j ..... ¡I,:! ¡) ! ' 'í! --' I ì ! ------'----, lr' , r------; ~ ¡ e,";-," ~ " ' i I ( If --1 ~ ,', 1 ' ,i , 'I-- ~ - , ,i, I ,~ì ,-~ I" ì" Ir-~~-- /. 'j' ~'?""'J ',- Ii: .. ", ""'" ') I Lb~III~~¡þ, ~ t ~' \ ~~ ~ f C")/I 1 I ~---- u}l I', I IIlfton /- J ffi- ~ -II \ I ' City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Su rface Waler Facilities Legend: . Conveyance Factllty . ReådørrliaJ ~urfaœ Water Faålity Â Commercial s~ Wmr Fmllty Regional S1DlTI'NIaIBr Fa:IHUea: 0 Lalal Dolloff 0 utfet 0 P-82 (Camelot PaI1c) 0 PeasI8'J Canyon Culvert 0 Regðncy Wood&, DIY 1 0 Regency Woods, DIY 4 0 Regency Wood&, DIY" (2) 0 S 36Oth 51 Embankment 0 SWeet Bñar DnnaliB IlT1Irovllment ø Regency Woods, Div 1 e Rllgllncy Wood&, Div 4 (3) D Problem, (In P AA) See text. 0 Problem, (Outside P.AA) See text N Stl'llalll6 100 Year Floocillaln IT:] Wetlands -~ Hy10b0s CrøekB.ln ~ Lower Green RIver Suln Lower Pulltlt Sound Basin "'II Creek Buln - WIitø River Basin Source: KQ County GIS Clnw,lJeœmber 2001, lOng County Department of Natural RIIOIR.S, December 2001 & JanullY - ~ March 2002, ::::liE KIng COll1tY Asstlt ~ Development and c: Management Section. ë3 March 2002 > Scale: 0 1nMlle !:l Not1r. Wøllands and mama ~ N were identifilld in a 1998 Clt of Federal Wtrt I11J . Map Dale: Deaember, 2003 PleaseNo18: ~afFedenJW~, Thi. Ini) Is Intendad for Ultl 0 RnlW:t;S' as I ~"hlcaI npr888ntlUon Federal W~t A 9aO03 ONL. e CIty Of Federal (258) 651 000 W?t malœc no warranty w.wt.å,fedBraI-wIY.wa.ua U 0 ill m:urac;y. åFëderalWay Map VIII ,A1~.__&l11 \~/] i- ~(I ~~~ ~ ,~'i> .¡;.to.sP {- ~~ J ~v ~ Yh.'- ~ Urnt! ~=MOIDb ..... ~ I~~- rLr\~ E ,g¡r~\.:& - ~ -$ r-r/1~' ,~ JJ \\~ - L ~.... , .... íöõ J V - ~ 13~ rr e -, .« ~eC' ~ ~ UjF ";2 U~f->i= ~~I~ ~i!%,Ø~._['" ~ ~~ ,il rl tl!-r [ ~11 ~~ ~ ,..~ n ~ ~ !~l-- '" ~-/~(~ ~ ~,~ b 8~~-fn~ it;.sr ~ ('I e-;'I..Qlt ~7q7E~ j~L~ M ~ 'L ~ s~hli In" ~ I' '\ ~~) lli ne{¡j(~ I ~ I 7; 8 !:;:- ~ ~~ .r(-! Auburn -1~ r 11 Ro I - 7- --- ::;:::; Lifo- I ~1/r--- . ~., ~ . III ~ J9 ,.., ':1) III~ '-... ,.. f r-¡.;'/ \ - -"'4 ø . ~ ; Mil i-~~7~;~~ /~~\~:~.". ~ .~ ~ -1\ ÇS=\ ~ ~~o - ~ ,.~ 1812l1li Q; -~ ~~ð =- - I - 'Lab..Aé" u. \- I ~..-lRT ,U í I ~ . .-¡ ~ ~ :J g J\j N -_# ~~ ï-Oj 0; -fJH'-¡ r(u ~/~"(#~~) l"-~! / i ~ I .----J ), I ~ ~- ! ~ \J / . tí ~ /'" I = 1 ~-= ~ ~ l ! ~ l ~....: ~~"!r~.T ¿~ ~=1- ~rE {) A. ...~- ~ ~f- if / i. ~ ;L I f¡ ---š, ~ r¡ ..LU I II ¡¡ ~ ~ J! r ~~ r 1 -g' I ToVÏJß¡ E ì;? ~ 'I, I I VA r \E ~ ,..~ l~. 1(-1 . ':rr-J .~~!àt II elfte t"} ~Q t, J A f¡: ~ II, I I ~ ~11o. '-;-Tf-~-rn."'. \..;¡ , I \\ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Arterials & Local Streets Leglll'ld: Federal Way S1rMt CI.sllcatlons: N PrIncipal Arterial N Mnor Arteñal N Principal Colactor N Mnor Coiedor Potential Ann8Xl1lon Area- Comm ~ ity LIIY.I S ubareu: D Redondo Em (Redondo Eut) D Star Lake (Northeast) D Camelot (Northeast) D North laIœ (Northeast) D Jovita (Southea5f) D LakeliII1d (Southeas1) D Parkway (Southeast) OtI1er Arau: D Incorporated Area D Unincorporated Ani Sourœ: KIna County GIS Center, December 2QO1, City at Federal Wav Co~rehen&ÎYII Plan, 2000 a. .., :E b- e: u 5 Scale: ~ 0 1/2 Mile ~ N Map Dale: Decambtr. 2003 Pl8I8eNotB: ~ at Federal Wr¡, Till. map 18 IntendBd for U8Ø 0 Am W:l; S. 18 a~1,hlcaI nprØlentl1lon Federal w~. A 91003 ONl. e CIty Of Federal (258) 661 000 WTc malœ8 no WIITIJ1ty WHN .d ,fllderal-'Nflf.wa.us 18 0 ill ill:Wã.W. AFëdaralWay Map IX .1In~....1 If, } '" 8T ( --L '\,.L, I J.-.U, I I J ~ r'- \.\ \ 'r-~I ~I-E~ Ì'--- : -- r::: v gO DHcd - \-:) '~, b'."'" ~= .Gllb ~ ~ "-- - I -' ~.,r~D' - - L - ;; v ~ a3,.JT e ~- .., r"" 1 IL .i -,' ~~ þ- --, 1'- ~ ~ i 1 ~i I -~ "\ Þ 1 J Îi '--- ~ . .1 " ~ -- \1.L- f \ ~) ~:~;; - U L r ~ I - rt::s. r, -j I r , G ! -;- ~ IT I '~;r " c:;:: n \ ~ !I--- -; ~ ~- ~ = -\'~ c 5,~J b-.~ 11'- I n15 ~8T 2- --- ] ~ -"Q/ ~~ ~ J I ~I H ~ E§ r \ - ~ ¡--- 'l: s.... '" . . ~ ne t, , ~ !.L ¡ a ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Auburn 'iii I-., --íl I ~I h ~ ~ .:iJ.¡¡n' ~ -., I' ¡( . Vi ~ ~ ~ , ;-.:"':"; ~ ~j21~:i ~c- ~~ ~tl1. ~ i~~. ~ u 6\. IMMhIW a ~ -' - ~ ~ - - ~ ~ 71 _ra " L 0 r w.- - I - - r¿ - ~ ~ <. ~ ,.1'\ ¡;7 00 ~ 'J. ~ '" I c_1Jp-. H) ,.-¡ ~ 17 [) \ g)\3 ~ # ~ \ ~ ¡--. 0 ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ -. .. ~ I # I ~ -/ h-' LJ E -"[itl) no " . / ï c ~ I ~/ I ~ /; ~ ~~ i ~ .. i'" I r-' . t \,J t< ~ ~ it ~ -= "- I .oJ. '" }/-.......~ I-- L~ ~4- of r- ~- r *F!'î~ T ¡':::j ~- D'-i & L. ~ - i.. ~ I a -.If' "'tJJ r J " r :0-' " I 1 I I q- ; ".i-. I r ~ (I ~t ToVÎúl 1 Xl' LL U8Ø1f1ST W Jt' - " ~n~ ~ (I~~/II 1 D ~ -f;.j /, II . - r= ~ - ~ ~ I ,( ~+' t ~1 A $, ~ II '~ ~o , --I - ~ '------ffi- \..;¡ I' I I lion /- (ì . -. . eo I \\ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Existing Roadway Level of Service Legend: Levlll of Service Intersections; 0 MeotJ¡ City LOS . Fail8d Intorseclion (Before Miligalioo) F8dllral Way SIrIIIt Clac;ificalions: N Prtnclpal Arterial N Mnor Artertal N Pñncipal Coltctor N Mnor Co.actor D Incorponrted Ana D Unincorporated hea Potential Annexlt!()n Area - Commll1lly LIIVIII S ubarell8: D Redondo Eat (Rlldcndo Eas1) D Star Lake (Northeast) D Camlllat (Northes) D North La/œ (Northeasß D Jovita (Southea&l) D La/œ/alld (SIIIIIhtmt) D ParKway (Southeast) Sourœ: lOng County GIS Cenlllr, DllCllmber2OD1, CIty of Fedel'll WI!/ Coß1lrehenBM PIli!, 2000, Jones & Stoke" 2002 Co .., ~ b c u so: Scale: ~ 0 1/2 Mile ~ N Map Dale: December, 2003 Plaase No1B: ~ of Fedel'll W~. Tille map Is Intended for uu 0 Am W{6 S. as a ~~l'ical reprtllontrtlon Fedlll1l W~t ABaOO3 ONL. II CIty of F8de11l (258) 6&1 000 W?c ma/œc no warranty WHN.ci .fedttl1l-w.-t.wa.us 1/1 0 ita aŒUracy. A F8deral Way MapX JIn~....1 IfJ I: I (.J. \.L,' _.Jrl.J 1-- J 17'=\:\,\ ¡( ~[~I ~I-E' ~ [~- -- c V fi.~H¿ ~ ~ "-' '-""'" ~~M."h. -., ~ ~ ~- LT\J ~ &lS1r~ 1\ - -L I ~r J...il-- i ~ .. :.;;; r ~~ IT LIlIœ I~ ~, r"" J --,' t1.~ J þ- -, I L \) ~ ~ i II ~ L 5! (~ p . I.. f >- t\ ~ ~ ~ ~\r U L to = >--'"""' ~ f' II ~ v- -ir=: - I=- '- ~. ~ åJ ""!~W: -~~ ~- H \ 'I... ~..' I ~~ ! ~ ~ ..~ ~ y " -II r, (¡ !~." Q:11 ~ ç' ~ ~n - I\'!I:: ;~~ - -- ',I J cy PJ:. b .~nt -rYJ ~8T r- . f--~ - Q) ~ ¡...' I.IIÚ 1;- . '7 I~I. >-1 n E~ ~,\>-,æ ;--_! 'l: - I..... or ¡ ! ~ Ine t". ~ I ~ ...-. '--...--. I VI :! ~ ~ Auburn :"\lh~1 ~ :¡~! ~ 7~ _¡:;:;rI'-U11 VI V \ _.:'*:.., ~ II ~(~ 6-- . I 1 \:'~et! ~! V"?" ' ~ . ~ ~ oC ~ 1_"<. '- ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~..,,-- !¡<V~~ <. : .l~ Is ø - .,. '--- ..J f Ir-.' L L ¡u ~ r ~ .-¡ 1 I > JIT- ~ ""'It: I C -/r:rrn I U 8: I ~) J. 1--- Ii,~ 7 I ~ 1-1 I / '. ri ~ f!+! 1'- \J (' ~ ~ i -: -= . E ~ v-......~ -,':;- ;f4- 1..-( ;, - -- r¡ r:¡:}:!J I .r é::j ~ ~ '-E & ... J - 7) i - - . I I ~ ~ .'1 rl- ./'. ~'- ,J.- - \J r dffi .~~: I i I ~"vita ~ t;:;r -f!. ' I I 1 "" . ili ~. ~cri ~ I I I( . ' - - b... V - I--- . 11 J ~~o+~ ~, A~ fJ I---- r¡ I I ~llon 'rñ-;ï~m-"'-;~- ~ '-~ I \\ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Vear2020 Roadway Level of Service L8III1d: LINe! of SelYice Intersections: 0 Meets City LOS . Failed Intersection (kforo MiligaliOl1) Fedaral WIN Strait CI.sificalions: N Prtnclpal Arfer1a1 N Mnor Artertal N Principal Co.eetor N Mnor Coloetor D Incorporatlld Ana D UnlncolllOnlld Area Potentlill Annndon Area- Commlllity Levol S ubareu: D Redondo Eat (Rodondo East) D Star Laka (Northeast) D Camelot (Northeast) D North LaIcD (Northeast) D Jovita (Southeast) D Lalœland (SIIIIIheast) D Parkway (Soullttut) SOUI'cII: King County GIS Canter, D_mber2001, CIty of Faden! W8¥ Col\1)rehenslv8 P18II, 2000, .IonM & Stokes. 2002 CL ... :Ii: b c: u 5= Scale: !:l 0 1/2 Mile ~ N Map Dafe: December, 2003 PlweNota: ~ of Federll W~, Tille map Is Intended for uee 0 Am W:6 s, as a ~~hlcaI npr88errtz1on Federal W~t A 91003 ONL. e Cllyd Federal (258) 661 000 W?t malœs no WIITInty w.wt.d ,1ederal-wIY .wa.us as 01111 ilŒUI'1ICV. A Fëderal Way Map XI ~.....I "-.--~ ; \, VYï' , I I ~-- 1\ -~-_r- J ~-' I , . .j: I Auburn ,/. . I ¡ ,~]~ : ... i "-----~ .- _m- ~ . I , ~, . ,- ..I . '-.\ I i I ",- /~ , ~J .\ I /"1 \~ , , , I \ . . ;... z I - City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area 20 Year Proposed I nte rsecti 0 n Improvements Legend: . Propoaed Inlllrsection Improvement Vicinity Map Scale: 0 1r¿ Mile ~ N ~ Map Date: December, 2003 City at Federal W~. aasso First WtIf S, Federal Wr¡. WA 91003 (258) 661-4000 w.wt .ci .federal-way.wa.us Pleue Nole: Thl8 map Illntandld for use aI a graphical reprtsentatlon ONLY. The City of Fedenl Wr¡ makec no warranty utoitB~. A fëdaraI Way Map XII .m ~-mpmap.aml 111' ~' (,., LU T~ ' ~-d I-- ~ 4J I CU ~"'h -,;'HJ' ~ ~ y ïÌ';Î< ~ Moln I ) '- fJ I-- ~ . Æ' ~ - L RII ? Fi - ~~u It ^lIIrlct ~ .,." 1 r ....... I .Jç--- -, 139 ~ ,~'-Þ-~'~ ~ ;, J~ il11 L ~~ ~. f~ UI~, ~r=: ~ h '~'.r ~ ~n ~~ ~~ ì ~ r "/ -jl r, fï !~¡ ¡::;-¡:ETI ". ' ç' 'n - \'~ ~~~ ,~ (-;¡ r:- ~(nlð '¡- [-0' 'cy ~f!1~J-~ fh ~ ] r ~'::: Dlctrlct, I I k' p m n \1 1-1 "' f- r-- ~ I ~ ! ~ J---- Auburn j 1 ~ - rí I ':;¡ 1 J r-- I---- =4! l . !!f 'l I ~ I f ~Æ\ - -':"" . I I L--.. ", \ r .-L' - \ I - I- ;jj I U f I!= ~~\ = ~ ~~7 {:-~ i'-~\¡J~~ - "l - I- ~ . ~ -. - ìtl;J1 ¡; .... ~~ ~ ..J, ^ 1 U I I rj ()í~~"inth .. ~-1. -! J -þ ¡¡¡; ,w. ~ 1\-11 I ,U I H .-¡ I [) , .æ, ( ~ ~~ l=~r~7 0 ct I # ~ .= -f on: ~ rddl I ~I Aa 'f / ~ ---'\~ I I'~ \J t< ~ - - ¡I..:: == - -1- ""'" t:~ 7~~~T ~ ~ -). ð ~ -'- 1/ ;' . . i I - lli ~ / I l-T ... I ( I loVÍúl ~ T ~.' í ~ ~ ,I ~, U U1 ( ill )UJ . ~.~ -----,~ r, þ¡' I - . V çg- fJl ~ ¡(¡e: I ~ I~ ~ ~ VC§j ~ I 1 ~ .,1¡ ~~ ~ h ~ ~ I' '1I~1. I - , ~ ~f7 I - ~ I ¡ tltvL L_--- .)~ f/ of IlllIon - -I , ~ ¡-, Paélfrc T ~ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Fi re Department Facilities Legend: . Fire Stalion N Fire Dletr1at Bound81Y CommLl1ity Levll Subarea Boundary D Incorporatlld Area D Unlncolpol'i1t.6d Area Sourœ: F&denI Way Fin Department, CIty at Federal Way GIS DMslon, Februuy 2002 a. ... :E b- ¡;:;;: u > Scale: ~ 0 1f¿ Mile ~ N Map Date: December, 2003 PlweNo18: ~ at Federal W~. Till, map I, IlI1endad for U88 0 FIret w~ S, 18 a ~~hlcaI npr88entzdon Faderal W~ A 8&003 ONL. eCltyci Federal (258) 661 00 W~ malœc no warranty WNN.ci .federal -wIY.wa.us as 0 ita m;uraC¥. 4 F8daral Way Map XIII .AIn~"'_1 i\~ Jill;" (~I J.-J... ,.-1 r\.\~ : f ,r,i I f1J I ~ I -E : I ~I::-_lp' ~- c= y : ~:,'¡'b ':' . ~, ~ I ~ 1\ ~ -;I ~f ~rA )'j ~~r 'I=~i ,i_',-. .) ,,-' r-' l' l f-¡ L#r ;:)~lT. e-f-, I KtJIIt -'~ '\ ::l-~lnJ~ r ~... .,;.' ... .~c:::t~ . ,;.. r ~ ~~W~= ß iF L ~-):" -!._. ~att::-~), ,'~ ~ ~} ~ ~ ~ 1 n ~ -{ ;.-" 1/ -¡, r f ~ ! -r- T Q I ~) l~ ~~ "".' ~:i" " ,'" J: -'¡;;' ~~';'í?l~ ~.~ ~II. - ~L r n l./flr- "J- ,=",' ':_~"IJfI&Jf"-': ] ,'I 11.1::: '. r J '-,-,' ..., 1-1- -. '\ "-.. - [ I LL 71 ! F:' r-- i~--/! Auburn L 1 . If- ~I I , .' ~ " . F_.. 'JJÑ - . . "'" ' ;' S.' *",.." I- f- :.. ~ 'r-'i. \ ï."'; i.. J. ~- ~ I ~ ~j ~;d8g- ¡J~~~~~o ., ~¿.1 '\ -. f,¿ I ~ - --!, ~ 1 U I ~q l ~~ ,. Ì(}rlh ~~.l -! / ^ -:J ~ )1if!'lke .. .-- r- ( L ,1 ¡u 'h.r I .-iA ~---':'LT}ii J' \ r \S ~'-'d~ I ~~ ï. ï 0 -I~ U ~r~J) ,~~i ¡ ~ I y / ,. ~ ~~= ~~ L~~ ~L - -.-:: ~r;;;:~,f If ¿~ . I -):i & ~- /7!i . r ~ 1'- I II [t - j f--Ll-L --' / I I' I.a.. I , , , {! r ~ " . .!II , I 10~: i(/~ ~ [J-j ~ ~ ni r;;;r.'., ~I (t===7- .I,' ~ , m -,~, II t;:;t' -.;;-)~ ,II idr c-Vi.1/li ,~ . - ~. r. ,.Q: I '\r'; I ~ ItJJ~:-- ). $': ,;;-11 I I ~ M[1o1 '^ I I J ffi".... ,.,,- ..7 ~ ~ I ~ City of Federal Way- Potential Annexation Area Public School Facilities Legend: N School District Boll1d;uy . Elementary School . Junior High Scbool D Senior High Schaal PotlllttiaJ AnnlXßon Ar8a" Commll1lty Laval S UbareBl: D Radondo East (Redondo Eas1) D Star Laka (Nartheas1) D Camelot (Northeast) D Nor1l1 LaIœ (Northeast) D Jovita (Southeast) D Lalœland (Soutt1east) D PaJ'l(Way (SOudtlut) OttIor Ar5a&: D Incorporated Area D Unincorporated Area Source: Fodoral Wr¡ School DI&tr1ct. CIty at Feden! Wa!I GIS DMslon. 2001 Scale: ~ 0 1/2 Mile ~ N Map Dale: December, 20D3 Pl0a8eNo18: ~atFedeI'llW~. ThI. map 18 Intended for U88 0 Am W:t S, as a ~~caI npr88.ntatlon Fedoral w~. A 9&003 ONL. Cllyd Federal (258) 651 000 W1c malœc no warranty WNN Jj .fadoral-wr¡.wa.us 18 a i1Iaœuracv. A FiideraI Way Map XIV .1I8no'rI1c8.."....œc41 ochldloLami I,':',~! ~,¡,ft2¡',~~.'C , r~~"'~' i'. "::)' WJF1 ~n \:'Ç\~~~ t~,'~,';~Íi:är"'i,,-',, " J.!~i.!: :' .. ~,). jj '!'¡~¡.:~/,~t:c':L ~:'T":m, ,. 1,= ,-~~ ¡ , É ' L:.': "..- (..~~~ ~' i'~~¡¡~~~;:;~!~ -~ ,0 ;::~ -'~{.~ ' L ..~ :c'= ø.:t¡'~M~== ~"":'f ~,. ,,' :, ,'~"~=:CJ 1~, ': I ,,; ....~'~: ',,1. J,:',:"""","'""""""'tl~,,',",,',,,,"',,,,"",: ',"" """"."~,,,,',~~, '.,';F£,jí[r,'""""",',"'",."c"!,'"H1"",rC'!J[;J""" .".ì1i"""::1,§!!'-.,"':,,"..,, .,i I~,!t',-"" "~',' <,,",," ~..~,,1 "'1',':;<",',, ". ',," ~~.' "~:~r,là",~~",,::'~,,, ",.~~""""" =§~";::",,";,,"',~' ",.,' ","""",""-"~""'"':J"""""",,,,,, ',i ~r:~'~;.~~k' (~' i ;' .~ Æ= ~ ~;! ~.~"l~" -~ : ~ j~: ~~ :llì.~ ,I " ~~"o..ç~",' ",,"of,.,.,...,-, ,,\;!bm I", '-~', --, '::!;,_',,~i ,.."~",, ",' ;;~~-O:;J:'~ ~i_-."-,~,, ,S,.. ¡:-~IA~t~::'lo"""!~ f?J~m';"c;," ~!- <" 'r"'~,.,,'.!.:"'.,.fif": /~~i ["~"",,,:i\ J=¿, £," ~~ §. ;.~~'. , '3~~""",,1~~H~~,,'~,, ~"l~~~:,," !;J~-L,~:~ (~),'~;:: 1),: I ~ " ..L'\. ð . " ,.,":'.. ,¡- r 'r; "',,", ~,'~"r>:,,~' ~" l~fJ¡'h"",'C';'"t ! ~ ß, iff ~"'1: 1,,-,'(, J ~.,1 V'd,,"",,' :~~~:"~nL--"~ 1f:~~,~;~~;~,' ¡tçP~~ffi~: I" W'~~ ~"'" i?z,"" ~].- )~f~~ n .~ l~, ~'.:,,' fi)4. J?;:I "~;"~"'" :: '-f'.", ';~,~o T, ""i":,) .f-:/~'I.";' 'r' )" f;:~"-~-"'~~~_~L""", '" "-/~,--,':]:, j'^ ,~""', i""'A;-,, "'""","'- t:~';~,."1=1i"/""",/1"""",,,;~~">,r"C=~=""', j,:".""."",""".,,;,,,",,',,'~H~? ""Ii I~ ".~., .. Æi:.o¡¡"":~'~ c¡.,~ ;~..~ ,,-I' ,.j;~ ~~}~:\\~~ ,'" 'lj;j~. "1-.:.. c." ;"l;i """",," . t t~,.::: \/" ~ ' a ~l e. fI, :..- 1, , 1<1'- "- I ""'~"",.: L..,-. '~"'" :i' Ét" fi~~f,,"" Ë~~l"" ",,~j I" ' -;i "1"'""5[\,,,,,,,', ~~""""":~"";',""",,,"'t.C,,"",,:;,,.,"') ::='.;"""",11H~mØ1 ' ..(-- ,~l ~IT,~ . ~þ,- ~ "~ I n ~,...,C~ "" '9 }: ,:~r:t:ïl ..~ ':, .,c..,,--' ",.::¡:: W~""-':'¡¡=""':""'~'" om" ',':::-J,,'-' ""~~.. ~ c, ",,' '~l' "" ';'?'"'"i", :?E5:"1;;: .. -¡!"'--;:;, ~;, -~ ",,'~' -;/ \"" :,' ri,. '~,,~,t':, ; rr', ~'! ~',~ f\¥m~" ~,~".I" }J Ji//:- l'~i--~f~ .~~.~~'vEr!"'-:..' ""I~~ , "'-'~'I, ' ~F ù /t'" J 'J::'" \:""'" '11-.+"", :,~~'" ,:::,,-" ~:'/ .~"c". ~w ", ¡¡ayer"a:~~":"'~,.~~~~:;""',,"""I',,.,,""', ~'" ,,"',,!,," . 7~ .:-G: ~"':~- '" ' , '¡¡'~7 , ',,~ ,--i~' '" ", '" ' "'" .:i-C,"" ~ ~ ' -ur ~]j)¿~~i ¡5 t ,1 L~"':' ,,; ~!fi-=",,: '\ ""- "! .:.. ': ~ ~ p~~ .~~~ J. ~-.~ f£';i" [~'~l-í "~"l / /".. :"':~c,:::,_J! , ~ ~/. ~'~ -:!fJ-:¡¡: ~,~ -';¡c<.,/ '7.t~ ,,' ,/7/'-':W"',,mHA\iE~ , Î, -¡ ',.'. ,," ~p"-" " . V ~~)~i;'~ A':':~\:.'~i~~7- r-Q ~,: '--'7~l \ \iJ ':~i-~,"¡~f!'¡~¡if~;' 1( ~:" '-.....'f-'f:c- "" "" " ,," - %-/ ~ "" '" , ~, .".,,-1\',-,,_,' ~~:h-t fl~;;ii~~:' .:;/; ~Iõ-' :- ?¡f~. t""',, ,,:' Ë~ - 1::' :'f. 'c'-, ~~;;É "'~"" j",~ Fi\, , ~'";cu,,, - 'J..',""" '", (¡;;'§ -t~'( "U!;" IiF'; 0" !'f':,-!-' '\ "~",.r- ~il-' ,Lþ§Jf: % fb I / ' : "<:=1' , '" ", 'I,~.r ~"" 'I t ..r:'-L' ""I':f.',,~'~~':'.-{I": '~:', ,v,' ,,: ,>,';;1 ... J ,,' ,,::; lWJn,"~ J",.~"-'ë'1"":-c ,.,,~>/ ,lak and iì:, ,,¡,",'\ 5f:. " - ~ "-r",, -- In~,,' "'"",,," c"" J J I:' k~,::: ÜwiÌt;:'¡:~ " -œj-';"I:iílr!ll~o~'¿~ "," .., "~ ,",'/' íi,¡~" , "" rc'.'!~,,' ~JI,,!,'~,~,',',:~,',~I_'fi.H'B"'" \: \;; C'ïl~,,';1,~,,~'~,., :'" f>Á ,°, . 't" ,'"", " ~ ~"C£ """,' A~~~"" "",',,",,'--, .;¡;J I ' "'",:,",'~'--,.'i,.'~ïl="" ','~" L ,c_: I:," ...-:\~,'" :" ' :~~'ã~. '¿"'" '!Ii;--; ~~ .'=:r.:.~~...-c'::-' ',' ,-' ,"" ~,'e~;'J;",.~;~~ç" , }h '1~~~&~i~1'i ~;~!.",-, ~-~~.:~~,,{WL ; ~,~',¡!,\ ~,.,ëT,,: ~..~",;", I', ~ " ";'!t~' ~'j~ 7&, ~!;j,~,,~,:,;, - i) ,I c-rur 'j~ I,.. ,----+-,-"?. w. off, II 'e ~::.~~' ~ì~'" <,'~ ::_--~fA?4f<t'~~'" I'"~ ~:...: /. " Ægj§i: "~\~ "-' ", /~.. ._, '" ." .....~... ' ¡Milton" ',':, ,"'~~=--'~:~-j.l.:);:,..1 't tP, ~C'-. City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area I Water Service legend: . Booster Pump Station All Intertie Vault W Tank . Well (lakehaven Utility District water source) ;;~;.:, lakehaven Utility District Boundary ',':1 ,,"',?'f Water Service Area Boundary N Water mains under 10" N Water mains over 10" Potential Annexation Area - Community level Subareas: D Redondo East (Redondo East) D Star lake (Northeast) D Camelot (Northeast) D North lake (Northeast) D Jovita (Southeast) D lakeland (Southeast) D Parkway (Southeast) Other Areas: D Incorporated Area D Unincorporated Area Source: Highline Water District, 2001, lakehaven Utility District, 2002 Cl. "" ::¡;: .q c:: 'u :> Scale: 0 1/2 Mile ~ N ~ Map Date: December, 2003 City of Federal Way, 33530 First Way S, Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 661-4000 WNW.ci ,federal-way wa.us Please Note: This map is intended for use as a graphical representation ONLY. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. A Federal Way Map XV fuserslmi<,slpaafdDc4fwat,r,aml '-;- :'-J) r '¡,' - '"t" " A' . I , I . - í City of Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Wastewater Service, Septic Repairs and Complaints Legend: . Septic Repairs (Complete/Pending) @ Septic Complaints .6. Booster Pump Station :¿'i;,'f Lakehaven Utility District Boundary ~.},;:; Sewer Service Area Boundary N Sewer mains under 10" N Sewer mains over 10" D Incorporated Area D Unincorporated Area Potential Annexation Area - Community level Subareas: D Redondo East (Redondo East) D Star lake (Northeast) D Camelot (Northeast) D North Lake (Northeast) D Jovita (Southeast) D lakeland (Southeast) D Parkway (Southeast) Source: Lakehaven Utility District, 2002 King County, 2002 a. <Ø :: è c u :> Scale: 0 1/2 Mile ~- ~ N Map Date: December, 2003 City of Federal Way, 33530 First Way S, Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 661-4000 WNN,ci.federal-way.wa.us Please Note: This map is intended for use as a graphical representation ONLY, The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. å. Fèëteral Way Map XVI ,Jusor>iml<oslpuldoc4/sowor,aml EXHIBIT ß 'ilL CHAPTER TWO - LAND USE 2.0 INTRODUCTION Through the CityShape and Vision process, the community produced a general concept of what the City should look and function like in the future. This general concept was used to form the basis of the Land Use chapter. The Land Use chapter serves as the foundation of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) by providing a framework for Federal Way's future development, and by setting forth policy direction for Federal Way's current and future land uses. Development of land, according to adopted policies and land use designations discussed in this chapter, should result in an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. The land use policies are supplemented by a Comprehensive Plan Designations Map (Map II-], maps are located at the end of the chapter) that provides a visual illustration of the proposed physical distribution and location of various land uses. This map allocates a supply of land for such uses as services, employment, parks, open space, and housing to meet future demand. 2.1 THE LAND USE CONCEPT Federal Way's existing land use pattern (the physical location of uses) exists as a result of development administered by King County until 1990 and subsequent development under Federal Way's jurisdiction. As shown in Map II-2 (Generalized Existing Land Use) and Figure II-] (Percent Gross Land Area By Existing Land Use, page 2), in September 2001, 42 percent of Federal Way's gross' land area was developed as single-family development, II percent as multiple-family development, and 12 percent for office, retail, and manufacturing uses. Updates to the FWCP will not substantially modify this land use pattern. What will change is how various pieces of the land use pattern interact to achieve common land use goals. Figure II-2 (page 3) depicts the land use concept. The land use concept should result in the following: # Transformation of the retail core into an intensely developed City Center that is the focus of civic activity which provides a sustainable balance of jobs and housing; # Preservation and enhancement of existing residential neighborhoods; Figure II-I FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Percent Gross Land Area by Existing Land Use, September 2001 Commercial 5% Office 4% Open Space 5% Single Family 42% Religious Services 1% Note: Does not include right-or-way. # Creation of a network of parks and open space areas; # Diversification of the City's employment base by creating distinct employment areas; # Promotion of new retail and service employment opportunities around the 1- 5/South 320th and I-5/SR 18 interchanges. # Promotion of new opportunities for residential development near transit centers; # Provision of community and commercial services to residential communities; # To the extent practicable, preservation of environmentally sensitive areas; # Promotion of convenient residentially scaled shopping for residential neighborhoods; # Promotion of housing in the City's commercial areas close to shopping and employment; # Promotion of redevelopment of "strip commercial" areas along major arterials into attractive, mixed-use corridors served by auto and transit; # Promotion of the development of well designed commercial and office developments; and # Accommodation of adopted growth targets for households and jobs and Puget Revised 2002 11-2 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Sound Regional Council (PSRC) growth projections within the proposed land use plan area. Revised 2002 11-3 FWCP - Chapter Two, land Use Figure II-2 The Concept Plan Diagram Concentrate new development in dIe Highway 99/1-5 corridor. Develop infrastnlctuf'e to support' conidor devetopment. Transfonn retail core into a new mixed-use City Center. , Preserve and enhance existing single- family neighbomoôds. Create. a netwOric of parks and open '.(1 œnid~. Diversify employment base by creating distinct employment a.-eas. '~ ~ C . .. "'" .d~af' reate new mtens.ve res. ènti . communities supported by transit. Provide community and com'meråaJ services tÞ residential comm~nities. Revised 2002 11-4 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use 2.2 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE CHAPTERS The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all FWCP chapters. Internal consistency among the chapters of the FWCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient use of limited resources. Below is a brief discussion of how the Land Use chapter relates to the other chapters of the FWCP. Economic Development Federal Way's economy is disproportionately divided. Based on PSRC's 2000 Covered Estimates by jurisdiction~ retail and service industries compose more than 70 percent of Federal Way's employment base. Covered estimates are jobs that are covered by unemployment insurance. Dependence on retail trade stems primarily from the City's evolution into a regional shopping destination for South King County and northeast Pierce County. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Tukwila and the Auburn SuperMan, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To improve Federal Way's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy. A diversified economy should achieve a better balance between jobs and housing and supports the City's quality of life. In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the following: # A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing. # Community Business and Business Park development in the South 348th Street area. # Community Business development in the South 348th Street area and around the 1- 5/South 320th and I-5/SR 18 interchanges. # Continued development of West Campus. # Continued development of East Campus (Weyerhaeuser Corporate and Office Park properties). # Redevelopment and development of the SR-99 corridor into an area of quality commercial and mixed use development. # Continued use of design standards for non-singleJamily areas. The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see Revised 2002 11-5 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use the Comprehensive Plan Designations Map II-I). A complete discussion of economic development is set forth in the Economic Development chapter. Capital Facilities Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, parks and open space, and surface water management. Infrastructure and Urban Services The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities and the maintenance of existing facilities. As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be financed by voter-approved bonds, impact fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), and money from the City's general fund. To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements. Water Availability Based on reports from the Lakehaven Utility District, the estimated available yield from the underlying aquifers is 10.1 million gallons per day (MGD, 10-year average based on average annual rainfall). The District controls which well to use, thus which aquifers are being pumped from, based on a number of considerations including water levels and rainfall. In order to reduce detrimental impacts to its groundwater supplies in the recent past, the District has also augmented its groundwater supplies with wholesale water purchased from the City of Tacoma through water system interties. In addition, the District has entered into a long-term agreement with the City of Tacoma and other South King County utilities to participate in the construction of Tacoma's Second Supply Project (a second water diversion from the Green River), which will provide additional water supplies to the region. As a result, the water levels in the aquifers have remained stable, and the District's water supply capacity will increase to 14.7 MGD on an annual average basis when Tacoma's Second Supply Project is completed in 2004. Concentrating growth, along with conservation measures, should help to conserve water. Water Quality Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City. Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water; and, continued health of the City's streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining the health of the aquifers that rely on surface water for recharge. Contamination of an aquifer, by contaminated surface water, could lead to serious health concerns and/or expensive treatment requirements. To address this concern and impacts of new Revised 2002 11-6 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use development, the City prepared a Surface Water Management Plan. The plan specifies actions to ensure water quality including the development of regional detention/ retention facilities to control rate and quality of water runoff. Furthermore, development of a wellhead protection program with the Lakehaven Utility District should provide guidelines to avoid possible contamination. Policies contained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for development near wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Capital Facilities chapter. Parks & Open Space One of the most important and valued elements of a high quality living and working environment is a parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction in environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent properties; provides areas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City. To maximize open space opportunities, the City will coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions to create a region-wide open space system as contemplated in the Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs). Map II-] depicts areas where existing and/or proposed parks and open spaces are located. This map is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan. Potential Annexation Area To facilitate intergovernmental planning and policy coordination, the CWPPs require each jurisdiction to, ".. .designate a potential annexation area" (P AA). The City's P AA lies within unincorporated King County, generally east of the present City boundary. The boundary has been defined through cooperative agreements between the City and adjacent jurisdictions. In November 2001, the The City of Federal Way, in partnership with King County, initiated the preparation of the Federal Way P,^J. has prepared a Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study for the P AA. The P AA Subarea Plan has been incorporated as Chapter Eight, Potential Annexation. This work vlÏll proooce 1\'10 distinct but interrelated products: a The Subarea Plan for integration in the FWCP, containing contains policies and plans addressing the full range of land uses, capital facilities, public services, and environmental issues relating to the P AA. and an The Annexation Feasibility Study.. which has been incorporated bv reference, that will guide the City and inform the citizens about the feasibility and phasing of any potential future annexations. A complete discussion regarding the City's P AA can be found in the Potential Annexation Area chapter. Natural Environment Federal Way's natural beauty is apparent. Lakes, streams, wetlands, and Puget Sound Revised 2002 11-7 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use provide a scenic backdrop as well as a source for active and passive recreation. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Federal Way's unique natural resources through policies that support the preservation of these areas for future generations. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter. Housing Housing is a basic need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families. An adequate supply of affordable, attractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a sense of community. The central issue related to land use is supplying enough land to accommodate projected growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is provided primarily in single-family subdivisions or multiple-unit complexes. This plan devises strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and encourage housing as part of mixed-use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing. A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter. City Center Map 11-1 depicts two City Center land use designations-the City Center Core and City Center Frame. The creation of an identifiable and vibrant "downtown" is one of the primary goals identified by the community during the CityShape planning process. The policies of the Land Use and City Center chapters envision a concentrated City Center comprised of mixed-use developments, pedestrian-oriented streetscapes, livable and affordable housing, a network of public spaces and parks, and development of superior design and quality. The City Center will provide a central gathering place for the community where civic and cultural activities and events take place. A complete discussion of the City Center can be found in the City Center Chapter. 2.3 POLICY BACKGROUND State and county land use policies provide a statutory framework for the development of City land use policies. It is important to briefly review state and county level policies to better understand historical conditions that have shaped the goals and policies in this chapter. Growth Management Act The Growth Management Act (GMA) acknowledges that, "...a lack of common goals Revised 2002 11-8 FWCP - Chapter Two, land Use expressing the public's interest in conservation and the wise use of our lands pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of this state" (RCW 36.70A.OIO). The GMA provides a framework for content and adoption of local comprehensive plans. The GMA provides 13 goals to be, "... used exclusively for the purpose of guiding development of comprehensive plans and development regulations." A number of the GMA goals pertain to land use. They are as follows: Urban Growth - Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. Reduce Sprawl - Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development. Housing- Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of the state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. Open Space and Recreation - Encourage the retention of open space and development of recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks. Environment - Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality and the availability of water. Public Facilities and Services - Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. Historic Preservation - Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical or archaeological significance. Property Rights - Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions pursuant to state and federal law. Regional Policies Vision 2020 and the CWPPs, both required by GMA, provide a regional framework to achieve the goals of the GMA. Vision 2020 is the long-range growth management, economic, and transportation strategy for the central Puget Sound region encompassing King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. It provides broad direction agreed to by member jurisdictions. Most notable is Vision 2020's direction for regional transportation. An important connection between Vision 2020 policies and the City's land use policies is development of an urban center, referred to as the City Center Core in the FWCP. Urban Revised 2002 11-9 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use centers are to accommodate a significant share of new growth, services, and facilities. The idea is to, "... build an environment in the urban centers that will attract residents and businesses" by concentrating residences, shopping, and employment in close proximity to each other and regional transit. The CWPPs are a further refinement of policy direction contained in the GMA and Vision 2020 and are a result of a collaborative process between King County and the suburban cities within. Policies contained herein have been prepared to implement the CWPPs as they apply to the City. CWPPs provide a framework for both the county and its respective cities. Adherence to these policies ensures that plans within the county are consistent with one another. These policies address such issues as the designation of urban growth areas, land use, affordable housing, provision of urban services for future development, transportation, and contiguous and orderly development. CWPPs have the most direct impact on land use policies in this chapter. By undertaking the following actions, the Land Use chapter is consistent with CWPP's direction: # Promoting phased development for efficient use of land and urban services; # Creating a City Center (urban center) as an area of concentrated employment and housing, served by high capacity transit, public facilities, parks, and open space; # Limiting growth outside the City Center to areas that are already urbanized; # Encouraging in-fill development; # Expanding business and office park development to include limited commercial; and # Establishing incentives to achieve desired goals. 2.4 PROJECTED GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY Projected Growth According to the 2000 u.S. Census, 83,259 people called Federal Way home. As of April 2002, the population had grown to 83,850 (based on the Washington State Office of Financial Management [OFM] population estimates). Most of the growth to date occurred during the decades of the 1960s and 1980s, during which time the City's population doubled. Federal Way is now the eighth largest city in the state and the fourth largest in King County. Future population and employment growth has been forecasted by OFM (Figure II-3, page 10). This future population and employment growth will be distributed between jurisdictions and unincorporated urban King County through a methodology that has been prepared by Revised 2002 11-10 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use the King County Planning Directors and approved by the Growth Management Planning Population Projection King County 2.5 .............. ................................. ... 2 .- ~ c 0 ~ 1.5 ......, c 0 ~ 1 1.16 ::;) 0. 0 a. 0.5 ............................................. ..... ............................................. ..... 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2025 Council (GMPC). This methodology is more fully discussed in the next section. Figure 11-3 Source: Office of Financial Management, 2002 Update to Growth Management Act Medium Review Population Projections Development Capacity The purpose of Buildable Lands is to measure capacity to accommodate projected growth and to evaluate the effectiveness of local plans and regulations. King County and five other cities must report to the state by September 1, 2002, and every five years thereafter, on their capacity to accommodate growth during the 20-year Growth Management period. In order to accomplish this, the Buildable Lands program requires annual data collection to determine the amount and density of new development, an inventory of the land supply suitable for development, and an assessment of each jurisdiction and the entire Urban Growth Area (UGA) to accommodate expected growth. In order to determine whether Federal Way has the capacity to accommodate future growth, City staff prepared a land inventory of buildable lands. Buildable lands are those parcels that are either vacant or redevelopable and are free of constraints to development, such as being environmentally sensitive. The capacity for future development in terms of number of new housing units and square footage of new commercial square footage is then derived based on densities achieved by development over the previous five year period, 1996 through 2000. King County Assessor's records were used to identify vacant and redevelopable land. In general, parcels were divided into three categories: fully-developed and parcels that were excluded from the capacity analysis; parcels that could be redeveloped; and parcels that Revised 2002 11.11 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use were vacant. With the exception of surplus lands owned by public agencies, such as the City, county, state, and utility, school, and fire districts-parcels owned by public agencies were excluded from the capacity analysis, as they are unlikely to be developed for private use. Common areas and open space in subdivisions were also excluded from the inventory. Commercial and industrial zoned parcels categorized as redevelopable are those where the ratio of improvements to land value is less than 50 percent. In residential zones, redevelopable parcels are those parcels which can be subdivided, or where the density can otherwise be increased, for example, redeveloped from single-family to multiple-family. The City has mapped environmental constraints (such as wetlands, streams, and geologically hazardous areas) and their respective setbacks, and therefore, critical areas were taken out at a parcel level. The remaining lands were then summarized by zoning designation. A series of discounts were then further applied. These discounts included right-of-way and public purpose factors. In addition to the reductions outlined above, a market discount factor was applied on a case-by-case basis depending on local conditions. Application of the market factor (discount) acknowledges that not all potentially developable parcels will be available for development and that some parcels may not be financially feasible to develop or redevelop. This year, the methodology for capacity analysis was modified to conform to the Buildable Lands requirements. In the past, capacity analysis was based on the theoretical maximum development allowed by zoning. In the current analysis, densities achieved over the last five years were used. For residential areas, the average number of units per acre achieved was used, and for commercial areas, average attained floor area ratios (FAR) were used. Densities and F ARs were then divided into the available land totals for residential and commercial land respectively, to estimate development potential. For redevelopable areas, the current existing building area or number of units were subtracted in order to determine additional capacity. Lastly, the number of units or the building square footage of pending projects was added to the subtotals, for a final estimate of capacity. Based on this methodology, Federal Way has the capacity for 5,538 new residential units and 16,194 new jobs. 2001 - 2022 Household and Job Targets During their September 25, 2002 meeting, the GMPC adopted a motion to add targets for new households and jobs for the period 200 I - 2022. These targets were based on a methodology developed over a two-year period by the King County Planning Directors. This methodology is summarized in the following section. King County was divided into four subareas. These four subareas are SeaShore, East King County, South King County, and Rural Cities. The City of Federal Way is part of the South King County Subarea that includes Renton, Burien, SeaTac, Tukwila,_Normandy Park, Des Moines, Kent, Covington, Maple Valley, Black Diamond, Federal Way, Auburn, Milton, Pacific, Algona, West Hill PAA, East Renton PAA, Fairwoodl Soos Revised 2002 11-12 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Creek P AA, and Southwest King County P AAs. The PSRC's 2000 to 2020 small area employment forecasts were used as a basis for allocating population forecasts to these subareas by applying the employment percentages to the OFM countywide population forecast so that the proportion of housing to jobs is balanced at a certain ratio. The household size of the various subareas were then determined based on the 2000 census, and adjusted downwards for 2022 based on the assumption that household sizes would decrease in the future. The household size for each subarea was used to determine how many new housing units would be needed to accommodate new population in 2022. Next, the remainder of the current household target by subarea at the end of2000 was compared to the new households needed to accommodate new population. If South King County were to achieve their remaining household 2012 target, this would actually exceed the number of households needed to accommodate the 2000 to 2022 projected new households for the subarea (Table II-I). As a result, the methodology proposed that South King County receive no new targets for the 2012 - 2022 target extension period. However, because South King County's remaining target of 50,430 households exceeded the 42,355 new households needed to accommodate 2001 - 2022 growth, the methodology proposed to credit the sub-regions the difference, thus reducing remaining targets. Table II-2 (page 13) shows the 2001 - 2022 household targets by jurisdiction in the South King County Subarea with the adjustment made for the credit. As in the case of the household target extensions, the starting point for employment allocations was forecast from estimates derived for each city by the PSRC 2000 to 2020 small area employment forecasts. Future employment was then allocated to jurisdictions based on location of current employment, as well as location of commercial and industrial zones. The adopted 2001 - 2022 job targets are shown in Table II-2. Table II-I Household Targets by King County Urban Subarea Subarea 1992-2012 Target Remainder New Household Additional Total Households 20 Year Achieved of Current Targets to Households to Accommodate Target 1993-2000 Target at Accommodate Needed Beyond 30- Year Population End of 2000 New 2000-2022 Current Target (1992-2022) Population SeaShore 57,905 16,375 41,530 56,369 14,839 72,744 East King 48,348 25,665 22,683 47,645 24,962 73,310 County South King 73,387 22,957 50,430 42,355 N/A 65,312 County Rural Cities 8,828 3,265 5,563 2,255 Na 5,520 Surplus (11,585) N/A Total 188,468 68,262 120,206 148,624 28,418 216,886 Revised 2002 11-13 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use s hID c S b Table II-2 H h Id dJ bT 2001 2022 out n2 ounty u area ouse 0 an 0 ar2ets, - Jurisdiction Number of Households Number of Jobs Algona 298 108 Auburn 5,928 6,079 Black Diamond \.099 2,525 Burien 1,552 1,712 Covington 1,173 900 Des Moines 1,576 1,695 Federal Way 6,188 7,481 Kent 4,284 11,500 Milton 50 1,054 Maple VaHey 300 804 Normandy Park 100 67 Pacific 996 108 Renton 6,198 27,597 SeaTac 4,478 9,288 Tukwila 3,200 16,000 Unincomorated King County 4,935 2,582 Total 42,355 89500 Development Capacity and Targets As discussed in the previous sections, in 2001 when the data for the Buildable Lands Study was prepared, the City of Federal Way had a capacity for 5,538 new residential housing units and 16,194 new jobs. In comparison, the adopted 2001 - 2022 targets are 6,188 new residential units and 7,481 new jobs. As a result, at that time the City had an 8,713 surplus capacity for jobs and a deficit capacity of 650 residential units in relationship to its targets. Based on residential units in the pipeline today, the City now has a deficit capacity of 41 0 residential units. In order to increase residential capacity to meet the adopted targets, City staff will propose that a definition of density for conventional subdivisions be added to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions." The definition of density will be based on gross acreage, which should result in relatively more lots than presently allowed, based on the requirement for minimum lot sizes. In addition, City staff will continue to monitor the City's progress towards reaching its targets, and will propose additional changes to the City Council, if warranted. 2.5 URBAN DESIGN AND FORM In addition to guiding development, the Land Use chapter also guides the quality and character of the City's future development pattern through goals and policies related to the form, function, and appearance of the built environment. These goals and policies, related to quality development, serve and will continue to serve as a basis from which to develop Revised 2002 11-14 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use appropriate implementation measures. Design guidelines, adopted in 1996 and 1999 are used as an integral component of the development review process. Design guidelines address location and type of pedestrian amenities and public spaces; pedestrian and vehicle circulation; building setbacks, orientation, form, and scale; landscaping; and mixed-use design. Goal LUGl Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. Policies LUPI Use residential design performance standards to maintain neighborhood character and ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. LUP2 Use design and performance standards to achieve a greater range of housing options in multiple-family designations. LUP3 Use design and performance standards to create attractive and desirable commercial and office developments. 2.6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS The Land Use chapter provides the policy foundation for implementing zoning and development regulations. In developing policy concerning future land use regulations, or revisions to existing regulations, every effort has been made to instill certainty and efficiency in the development process. State legislation has focused on developing streamlined and timely permit processing. The City has conducted Developer Forums to solicit input regarding the City's permit processing system. Comments received during the Forums provided invaluable information to evaluate the City's permit system. In 2002, the City formed a stakeholders group that reviewed the City's permitting process and made recommendations on how to improve or modify the regulations and processes. Through the following policies, the City continues to strive to provide an efficient and timely review system. Goal LUG2 Develop an efficient and timely development review process based on a publici private partnership. Revised 2002 11-15 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use 2.7 Policies LUP4 LUP5 LUP6 LUP7 LUP8 Maximize efficiency ofthe development review process. Assist developers with proposals by continuing to offer preapplication meetings in order to produce projects that will be reviewed efficiently. Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to detennine how to improve upon the pennit review process. Integrate and coordinate construction of public infÌ"astructure with private development to minimize costs wherever possible. Increase efficiency in the pennit process by responding to state legislation concerning development review processes. CITYWIDE POLICIES Citywide policies apply to all FWCP designations. These general policies are intended to maintain the quality of the living and working environment and ensure that the interests, economy, and welfare of the community are considered. Policies LUP9 LUPIO LUPll LUP12 LUP13 Designate and zone land to provide for Federal Way's share of regionally adopted demand forecasts for residential, commercial, and industrial uses for the next 20 years. Support a diverse community comprised of neighborhoods that provide a range of housing options; a vibrant City Center; well designed and functioning commercial areas; and distinctive neighborhood retail areas. Support the continuation of a strong residential community. Evaluate household and employment forecasts on a periodic basis to ensure that land use policies based on previous assumptions are current. Distribute park and recreational opportunities equitably throughout the City. Revised 2002 11-16 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use 2.8 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The land use designations in the FWCP recognize the relationships between broad patterns of land uses. The designations set forth locational criteria for each specific class of uses consistent with the long-term objectives of the FWCP. These designations provide the purpose and intent for specific zoning districts. The location of comprehensive plan land use designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan Designations Map (Map Il- l). Residential Areas Single Family Federal Way is known for its quality single-family neighborhoods. This section contains goals and policies that will shape future development and protect or improve the character and livability of established neighborhoods. The demand for and development of single-family housing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Single-family development will occur as in-fill development of vacant lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for developing single-family subdivisions. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments, lot size averaging, zero lot line development,_accessory dwelling units and special needs housing. Single Family Low Density The Single Family Low Density designation retains larger urban lots in order to avoid development pressure on or near environmentally sensitive areas and to retain areas that have unique area-wide circumstance. There are two notable locations: Spring Valley, located in the southern portion of the City; and along Puget Sound near Dumas Bay in the vicinity of Camp Kilworth and the Palisades Retreat property. The Single Family Low Density designation continues the historic application of low density zoning in areas that lack urban services and infrastructure. Moreover, the application of large urban lot zoning is appropriate to avoid excessive development pressures on or near environmentally sensitive areas as well as to serve as a buffer between adjacent land use designations of higher densities. Upon provision of urban services, such as water and sewer, an increase in density may be warranted. The Single Family Low Density designation in the Spring Valley and Dumas Bay areas have numerous environmentally sensitive features including, but not limited to: wetlands, flooding potential, geologically hazardous areas, streams (including salmonid habitat), and wildlife habitat, and groundwater infiltration potential. Due to the sensitive nature of this area, the Draft Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Plan recommends zoning of one Revised 2002 11-17 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use lot per five acres. Single Family Medium Density The Single Family Medium Density designation creates urban lots with a density range of one to three dwelling units per acre to avoid developing on or near environmentally sensitive areas. The Single Family Medium Density designation can be found along the Puget Sound shoreline and south of South 356th Street, both east and west of SR 99. Lot sizes of 35,000 and 15,000 square feet provide for a transition in density between land designated as Single Family High Density Residential and Single Family Low Density Residential. Some areas designated as Single Family Medium Density Residential still lack urban services and infrastructure. Upon provision of urban services, such as water and sewer, an increase in density may be warranted. The relatively large lot sizes along the Puget Sound shoreline areas are appropriate due to geological features including steep slopes and landslide hazards commonly associated with marine bluffs. As with the Single Family Low designation, the Single Family Medium designations south of South 356th are located in the West Branch Hylebos Creek Sub- Basin. As noted in the Single Family Low Density description, this sub-basin contains a number of environmentally sensitive areas. Single Family High Density A majority of the single-family residential land in the City is designated as Single Family High Density. Urban densities of approximately 4.5, 6.0, and 8.7 dwelling units per acre in the RS 9.6, RS 7.2, and RS 5.0 zoning districts respectively, provide for a range of housing densities. Single Family High Density residential designations are located within close and convenient proximity to neighborhood business centers, areas of existing or future employment, transit, and existing urban infrastructure and services. Future Single Family High Density development should have good access to collector and arterial streets. Goal LUG3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single-family neighborhoods. LUG3.1 Provide wide range o/housing densities and types in the single-family designated areas. Policies LUP14 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single-family neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations. LUP15 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses. LUP16 Revise existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new single-family developments and in-fill. Revised 2002 11-18 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP17 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve single-family neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP18 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas to preserve the natural setting of Federal Way. LUP19 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single-family areas, provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. LUP20 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, water- courses, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, and lot size averaging. Multiple Family The multiple-family residential land use designation represents an opportunity to provide a range of housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth. The increase in population, decline in average family size, and increased cost of single-family homes have created heavy demand for new housing types. The Land Use chapter encourages the development of housing types, such as duplexes, townhouses, and condominiums in existing multiple-family areas and within mixed-use development in commercial areas. During the 1980s, the City's landscape changed, as a number oflarge apartment complexes were constructed. These apartments, often built without regard to scale or amenities, created a general dissatisfaction with the appearance of multiple-family development. In 1999, the City amended its Community Design Guidelines to address the appearance and scale of multiple family dwelling units. Incentives for creating desired development such as duplexes and townhouses should be considered. Multiple Family Multiple Family uses in large part are in areas currently zoned for multiple-family development. Designations of 3600, 2400, and 1800 square feet per dwelling unit, corresponding to densities of 12, 18, and 24 dwelling units per acre respectively, will continue to be used. Opportunities for new development will occur through redevelopment and build-out of remaining parcels. Residential design guidelines that address design and appearance of multiple-family developments were adopted in 1999. The primary goal of residential design guidelines is to develop multiple-family housing that is reflective of the community's character and appearance. Goal LUG4 Provide a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the Revised 2002 11-19 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Policies LUP21 LUP22 LUP23 LUP24 LUP25 community's needs and preferences. Allow and encourage a variety of multiple-family housing types in designated commercial areas, especially in the City Center Core and City Center Frame areas. Use design and perfonnance standards for multiple-family developments to achieve integration in commercial developments. Perfonnance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Support multiple-family development with transportation and capital facilities improvements. Multiple-family residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common open space. Variations in facades and rooflines should be used to add character and interest to multiple-family developments. Encourage the establishment of street patterns and amenities that encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use. Commercial Designations Existing commercial areas are auto-oriented and characterized by one-story low intensity development. In the future, these areas will become more intensively developed and pedestrian oriented, and in some designations, accommodate housing. Transfonning existing areas into places where people want to live, shop, and work requires changes. Commercial areas should contain street furniture, trees, pedestrian shelters, well marked crosswalks, and buildings oriented to and along the street to provide interest and allow easy pedestrian access. General Policies for Commercial, Office, and Business Park The following general policies apply to all commercial, office, and business park designations. In some instances, specific goals and policies may follow a specific land use designation Policies LUP26 LUP27 LUP28 Provide employment and business opportunities by allocating adequate land for commercial, office, and business park development. Encourage development of regional uses in the City Center. Provide for a mix of commercial and residential uses in commercial areas. Revised 2002 11-20 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP29 L UP30 LUP31 LUP32 L UP33 LUP34 Use Community Design Guidelines to promote common open space, public art, and plazas in commercial and office developments. Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. Use Community Design Guidelines to encourage quality design and pedestrian and vehicle circulation in office, commercial, and business park developments. Use Community Design Guidelines to encourage commercial development to locate along street edge (where deemed appropriate) to provide pedestrian street access. Provide pedestrian access between developments and to transit stations. Identify and designate streets where on-street parking can be safely provided without unduly slowing traffic flow or jeopardizing traffic safety. Provide developer incentives for inclusion of housing in commercial projects. Business Park The Business Park designation encompasses the uses found in areas where large undeveloped and underdeveloped parcels, having convenient access to Interstate 5 and Highway 18, provide a natural location for business park development. The Business Park designation is intended to capture the demand for higher quality, mixed-use business parks which permit a mixture of light manufacturing, warehouse/distribution, office, and limited retail uses to serve the immediate needs in the area. In the past few years, the City has observed a marked increase in requests to change parcels from the Business Park designation to another comprehensive plan designation. As a result, the City should explore potential changes to the allowable mix of uses in the Business Park zone in order to meet changing market conditions. Goal LUGS Policies LUP3S LUP36 LUP37 Develop a quality business park area that supports surrounding commercial areas. Encourage quality, mixed-use development for office, manufacturing, and distribution centers. Develop business parks that fit into their surroundings by grouping similar industries in order to reduce or eliminate land use conflicts, allow sharing of public facilities and services, and improve traffic flow and safety. Limit retail uses to those that serve the needs of people employed in the area. Revised 2002 11-21 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Commercial City Center Core The intent of establishing the City Center Core is to create a higher density, mixed-use designation where office, retail, government uses, and residential uses are concentrated. Other uses such as cultural/civic facilities, community services, and housing will be highly encouraged. City Center Frame The City Center Frame designation will have a look and feel similar to the Core and will provide a zone of less dense, mixed-use development physically surrounding a portion of the City Center Core. Together, they are meant to complement each other to create a "downtown" area. A more detailed description, along with goals and policies regarding the City Center Core and Frame, can be found in the City Center chapter. Community Business The Community Business designation presently encompasses two major retail areas of the City. It covers the "strip" retail areas along SR-99 and the large "bulk" retail area found near the South 348th Street area, approximately between SR-99 and 1-5. Community Business allows a large range of uses and is the City's largest retail designation in terms of area. The Community Business designation generally runs along both sides of SR-99 from South 272nd to South 348th. A wide range of development types, appearance, ages, function, and scale can be found along SR-99. Older, single-story developments provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment. It may be appropriate to extend the Community Business designation to areas adjacent to the 1-5/South 32ûth and 1-5/SR IS interchanges as part of the initial adoption of the PAA Subarea Plan or as part of the annual comprehensive plan amendment process. Due in part to convenient access and available land, the South 34Sth Street area has become a preferred location for large bulk retailers such as Eagle Hardware, Home Depot, and Costco. Due to the size of these facilities, the challenge will be to develop these uses into well functioning, aesthetically pleasing retail environments. To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionally attractive, revised development standards, applied through Community Business zoning and Community Design Guidelines, address design quality, mixed-use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site design, modulation, and setback requirements are also addressed. Through regulations in the Community Business land use chart, the size and scale of hotels, motels, and office uses have been limited in scale so as not to compete with the City Center. Goal LUG6 Transfonn Community Business areas into vital, attractive, mixed-use areas that appeal to pedestrians and motorists and enhance the community's image. Revised 2002 11-22 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Policies LUP38 LUP39 Encourage transfonnation of Pacific Highway (SR-99) Community Business corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. Encourage auto-oriented large bulk retailers to locate in the South 348th Street Community Business area. Neighborhood Business There are a dozen various sized nodes of Neighborhood Business located throughout the City. These nodes are areas that have historically provided retail and/or services to adjacent residential areas. The FWCP recognizes the importance of finnly fixed boundaries to prevent commercial intrusion into adjacent neighborhoods. Neighborhood Business areas are intended to provide convenient goods (e.g., groceries and hardware) and services (e.g., dry cleaners, dentist, bank) at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses. Developments combining residential and commercial uses provide a convenient living environment within these nodes. In the future, attention should be given to design features that enhance the appearance or function of these areas. Improvements may include sidewalks, open space and street trees, and parking either on street or oriented away from the street edge. The function of neighborhood business areas can also be enhanced by safe pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections to surrounding neighborhoods. The need to address expansion or intensification may occur in the future depending on population growth. Future neighborhood business locations should be carefully chosen and sized to meet the needs of adjacent residential areas. Goal LUG7 Policies LUP40 LUP41 LUP42 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Integrate retail developments into surrounding neighborhoods through attention to quality design and function. Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and servIces. Encourage neighborhood retail and personal services to locate at appropriate locations where local economic demand and design solutions demonstrate compatibility with the neighborhood. Revised 2002 11-23 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP43 Retail and personal services should be encouraged to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. LUP44 Neighborhood Business centers should consist of neighborhood scale retail and personal services. LUP45 Encourage mixed residential and commercial development in Neighborhood Business designations where compatibility with nearby uses can be demonstrated. LUP46 Neighborhood Business areas should be served by transit. LUP47 The City shall limit new commercial development to existing commercial areas to protect residential areas. Commercial Recreation The Commercial Recreation designation acknowledges the unique recreational opportunity associated with the Enchanted Park property. Enchanted Park is an indoor/ outdoor amusement facility most noted for its water park. A pre annexation concomitant development agreement has established the comprehensive plan designation and zoning (Office Park-4) particular to Enchanted Park. Office Federal Way is well known for its quality office parks. Developments within the East and West Campus areas embody good design and are representative of desired future office park development. Office park development in West Campus is complemented by the Weyerhaeuser Corporate Headquarters in East Campus. Together, office and corporate park development will provide new job opportunities within the community. Professional Office The Professional Office designation is intended to allow for well-designed small-scale office development compatible to adjacent residential neighborhoods. Office Park The Office Park designation emphasizes high quality office development that allows for a mix of office and compatible manufacturing type activities. This classification also permits a limited amount of retail support services, along with the current mix of office and light manufacturing uses. Corporate Park The Corporate Park designation applies to the Weyerhaeuser Corporate Campus, generally located east of Interstate Highway 5. The property is a unique site, both in terms of its development capacity and natural features. Office Park designations with OP-l, 2, and 3 zoning and some residential designations Revised 2002 11-24 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use north of Highway 18 surround the Corporate Park designation. The Corporate_Park zone is currently being developed as corporate headquarters, offices, and ancillary uses. These types of developments are characterized by large contiguous sites containing landscaping, open space, and buildings of superior quality. Development standards and conditions for the Corporate Park designation is unique to Weyerhaeuser's property and are outlined in a preannexation concomitant development agreement between the City and Weyerhaeuser Corporation. Goal LUGS Create office and corporate park development that is known regionally for its design and function. Policy LUP48 Continue to encourage quality office development in the East Campus Corporate Park designation. 2.8.5 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Purpose The Shoreline Management Act (SMA) identifies seven land and water use elements that, if appropriate to the community, are to be dealt with in the development of area-wide shoreline goals. They include: shoreline use, economic development, public access, conservation, recreation, historical/cultural, and circulation. Master programs are also encouraged to include any other elements which, because of present uses or future needs, are deemed appropriate to effectuate the policy of the SMA. Residential land use of shorelines of the state within Federal Way makes up the largest share of the developed shorelines in the City. Much of the undeveloped shoreline is in private ownership, subdivided into small lots and presently zoned to allow for residential use. Because of present and future needs of residential shoreline use, goals and policies have been formulated as part of a residential element to guide and plan for that development. The following comprehensive set of shoreline goals provide the foundation and framework on which the balance of the master program has been based. These goals and policies are reflective of the level of achievement believed to be intrinsically desirable for all shoreline uses, needs, and developments, and establish a program policy commensurate with the intent and objectives of the SMA. The policies contained herein should be enforced through the applicable chapters of the FWCC. Revised 2002 11-25 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Shoreline Use Element An element which deals with the distribution, location, and extent of: 1) the use of shorelines and adjacent areas for housing, transportation, office, public buildings and utilities, education, and natural resources; 2) the use of the water for aquaculture and recreation; and 3) the use of the water, shoreline, and uplands for other categories ofland and water uses and activities not specified in this master program. Goal LUG9 Policies LUP49 LUP50 LUP51 LUP52 LUP53 LUP54 LUP55 LUP56 Preserve or develop shorelines, adjacent uplands, and adjacent water areas in a manner that assures a balance of shoreline uses with minimal adverse effect on the quality of life, water, and environment. Shoreline land and water areas particularly suited for specific and appropriate uses should be designated and reserved for such uses. Shoreline land and water uses should satisfy the economic, social, and physical needs of the regional population, but should not exceed the physical carrying capacity of the shoreline areas. Where appropriate, land and water uses should be located to restore or enhance the land and water environments. Like or compatible shoreline uses should be clustered or distributed in a rational manner, rather than allowed to develop haphazardly. Multiple uses of shoreline should be encouraged where location and integration of compatible uses or activities are feasible. Unique and fragile areas of the shoreline should be protected from uses or activities that will have an adverse effect on the land or water environment. Non-residential uses or activities that are not shoreline dependent should be encouraged to locate or relocate away from the shoreline. Federal Way shall consider the goals, objectives, and policies within the shoreline master program in all land use management actions regarding the use or development of adjacent uplands or the water areas, adjacent uplands and associated wetlands or streams within its jurisdiction where such use or development will have an adverse effect on designated shorelines. Revised 2002 11-26 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Public Access Element An element making provision for public access to publicly-owned shorelines and assessing the need for providing public access to shoreline areas. Goal LUGIO Increase public access to shoreline areas provided that private rights, public safety, and the natural shoreline character are not adversely affected. Policies LUP57 Development of public access should respect and protect the enjoyment of private rights on shoreline property. a. Shoreline access areas should be planned to include ancillary facilities such as parking and sanitation when appropriate. b. Shoreline access and ancillary facilities should be designed and developed to provide adequate protection for adjacent private properties. LUP58 Public access should be maintained and regulated. a. Public access should be policed and improved consistent with intensity of use. b. The provision to restrict access as to nature, time, number of people, and area may be appropriate for public pedestrian easements and other public access areas where there are spawning grounds, fragile aquatic life habitats, or potential hazard for pedestrian safety. c. Facilities in public shoreline access areas should be properly maintained and operated. LUP59 Design of access should provide for the public health, safety, and enjoyment. a. Appropriate signs should be used to designate publicly owned shorelines. b. Within the shoreline environment, pedestrian and non-motorized access should be encouraged. c. Public access to and along the water's edge should be available in publicly owned shorelines that are tolerant of human activity. LUP60 Priority for access acquisition should consider resource desirability, availability, Revised 2002 11-27 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP61 LUP62 LUP63 and proximity of population. a. A shoreline element in the parks acquisition and development program should be encouraged so that future shoreline access is acquired and developed by established criteria and standards as part of an overall master plan. Public access should be provided in new shoreline developments. a. There should be incentives to encourage private property owners to provide shoreline access. b. Public pedestrian easements should be provided in future land use authorizations, and in the case of Federal Way projects along lakes, streams, ponds, and marine lands, whenever shoreline features are appropriate for public use. Shorelines of the City that include, but are not limited to, any of the following conditions should be considered for pedestrian easements: 1. Areas of significant, historical, geological, and/or biological circumstances. 2. Areas presently being legally used, or historically having been legally used, by the public along the shoreline for access. 3. Where public funds have been expended on or related to the water body. Shorelines of the City should be available to all people for passive use and enjoyment. a. Viewpoints, lookouts, and vistas of shorelines of the City should be publicly accessible. b. New developments should minimize visual and physical obstruction of the water from shoreline roads and upland owners. General policies. a. Where appropriate, utility and transportation rights-of-way on the shoreline should be made available for public access and use. b. Publicly-owned street ends that abut the shoreline should be retained and/or reclaimed for public access. c. Shoreline recreational facilities and other public access points should be connected by trails, bicycle pathways, and other access links where Revised 2002 11-28 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use appropriate. d. Public pedestrian easements and access points should be of a nature and scale that would be compatible with the abutting and adjacent land use as well as natural features, including aquatic life. e. Access development should respect and protect ecological and aesthetic values in the shorelines of the City. Conservation Element An element which deals with the preservation of natural shoreline resources, considering, but not limited to, such characteristics as scenic vistas, park-ways, vital estuarine areas for fish and wildlife protection, beaches, and other valuable natural or aesthetic features. Goal LUG11 Assure preservation of unique and non-renewable natural resources and assure conservation of renewable natural resources for the benefit of existing and future generations and the public interest. Policies LUP64 Shorelines that are of unique or valuable natural character should be acquired for public benefit, commensurate with preservation of the ecosystem. a. Unique and fragile areas in shoreline areas should be designated and retained as open space. Access and use should be restricted or prohibited when necessary for their preservation. b. When appropriate, Federal Way should acquire those shoreline areas which are unique or valuable. Subsequent use of such areas should be governed by their ecological carrying capacity. LUP65 All renewable natural resources should be managed so that use or consumption does not exceed replenishment. a. Through policies and actions, Federal Way should encourage the management and conservation of fish, shellfish, wildlife, and other renewable resources. LUP66 Resource conservation should be an integral part of shoreline planning. a. When feasible, Federal Way should initiate programs to reverse any substantial adverse impacts caused by existing shoreline development. Revised 2002 11-29 FWCP - Chapter Two, land Use LUP67 LUP68 LUP69 b. All future shoreline development should be planned, designed, and sited to minimize adverse impact upon the natural shoreline environment. Scenic, aesthetic, and ecological qualities of natural and developed shorelines should be recognized and preserved as valuable resources. a. When appropriate, natural tlora.and fauna should be preserved or restored. b. In shoreline areas, the natural topography should not be substantially altered. c. Shoreline structures should be sited and designed to minimize view obstruction and should be visually compatible with the shoreline character. d. Wildlife and aquatic habitats, including spawning grounds, should be protected, improved, and, if appropriate, increased. Resources should be managed to enhance the environment with minimal adverse effect. a. Aquaculture in shoreline areas should be conducted with all reasonable precautions to insure the preservation of the natural character and quality of the shoreline. b. Shoreline activity and development should be planned, constructed, and operated to minimize adverse effects on the natural processes of the shoreline, and should maintain or enhance the quality of air, soil, and water on the shoreline. c. Any structure or activity in or near the water should be constructed in such a way that it will minimize adverse physical or chemical effects on water quality, vegetation, fish, shellfish, or wildlife. d. Use or activity which substantially degrades the natural resources of the shoreline should not be allowed. Salmon and steelhead habitats support valuable recreational and commercial fisheries. These habitats should be protected because of their importance to the aquatic ecosystem and the state and local economy. a. Salmon and steelhead habitats are: 1. Gravel bottomed streams used for spawning; 2. Streams, lakes, and wetlands used for rearing, feeding, and cover and refuge from predators and high waters; Revised 2002 11-30 FWCP - Chapter Two, land Use 3. Streams and salt water bodies used as migration corridors; and 4. Shallow areas of salt water bodies used for rearing, feeding, and cover and refuge from predators and currents. b. Non-water-dependent or non-water-related uses, activities, structures, and landfills should not be located in salmon and steelhead habitats. c. Where alternative locations exist, water-dependent and water-related uses, activities, structures, and landfills should not be located in salmon and steelhead habitats. d. Where uses, activities, structures, and landfills must locate in salmon and steelhead habitats, impacts on these areas should be lessened to the maximum extent possible. Significant unavoidable impacts should be mitigated by creating in-kind replacement habitat near the project where feasible. Where in-kind replacement mitigation is not feasible, rehabilitating degraded habitat may be required. Mitigation proposals should be developed in consultation with the affected local government, the Department of Fisheries, the Department of Wildlife, and affected Indian Nations. e. Developments which are outside salmon and steelhead habitats but which have the potential to significantly affect these habitats should be located and designed so they do not create significant negative impacts on salmon and steelhead habitats. f. Bioengineering is the preferred bank protection technique for rivers and streams used by salmon and steelhead. g. Open pile bridges are preferred for crossing water areas used by salmon and steelhead. h. Impervious surfaces shall be minimized in upland developments to reduce stonnwater runoff peaks. Structures and uses creating significant impervious surfaces shall include stormwater detention systems to reduce stormwater runoff peaks. 1. The discharge of silt into waterways shall be minimized during in-water and upland construction. J. Adopt-A-Stream programs and similar efforts to rehabilitate salmon and steelhead spawning streams are encouraged. k. Fishery enhancement projects are encouraged where they will not significantly interfere with other beneficial uses. 1. Project proponents should contact the Habitat Management Division of the Revised 2002 11-31 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Department of Fisheries, the Habitat Division of the Department of Wildlife or affected Indian Nations early in the development process to detennine if the proposal will occur in or adjacent to a salmon and steelhead habitat. m. When reviewing pennits for uses, activities, and structures proposed for salt water areas, streams, wetlands, ponds connected to streams, and shorelines adjacent to these areas; staff should contact the Habitat Management Division of the Department of Fisheries or the Habitat Division of the Department of Wildlife to detennine if the proposal will occur in or affect an adjacent salmon or steelhead habitat. Staff should also contact affected Indian Nations. Recreation Element An element for the preservation and expansion of all types of recreational opportunities through programs of acquisition, development, and various means of less-than-fee acquisition. Goal LUG12 Provide additional shoreline dependent and water oriented recreation opportunities that are diverse, convenient, and adequate for the regional population consistent with the carrying capacity of the land and water resources. Policies LUP70 Areas containing special shoreline recreation qualities not easily duplicated should be available for public use and enjoyment. a. Opportunities should be provided for the public to understand natural shoreline processes and experience natural resource features. b. Public viewing and interpretation should be encouraged at or near governmental shoreline activities when consistent with security and public safety. LUP71 Shoreline recreational use and development should enhance environmental quality with minimal adverse effect on the natural resources. a. Stretches of relatively inaccessible and unspoiled shoreline should be available and designated as low intensity recreational use areas with minimal development. Service facilities such as footpaths, periphery parking, and adequate sanitary facilities should only be allowed where appropriate. b. Beaches and other predominantly undeveloped shorelines already popular should be available and designated as medium intensity recreational use Revised 2002 11-32 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use areas to be free from expansive development; intensity of use should respect and protect the natural qualities of the area. c. Small or linear portions of the shoreline suitable for recreational purposes should be available and designated as transitional use areas that allow for variable intensities of use, which may include vista points, pedestrian walkways, water entry points, and access from the water; utilizing stream floodplains, street ends, steep slopes, and shoreline areas adjacent to waterfront roads. d. At suitable locations, shorelines should be made available and designated as high intensive use areas that provide for a wide variety of activities. e. Overall design and development in shoreline recreational areas should be responsive to the site characteristics of those areas and be consistent with the level of use in the area concerned. f. Recreation areas on the shoreline should have adequate surveillance and maintenance. g. The public should be provided with additional off-site and on-site guidance and control to protect shoreline resources. h. Where a wide berm is needed for dry beach recreation, and physical conditions permit sand retention, consideration should be given to creating a Class I beach I when such development does not destroy valuable biota or unique physical conditions. 1. Access to recreational shoreline areas afforded by water and land circulation systems should be determined by the concept of optimum carrying capacity and recreational quality. J. Non-water oriented recreational facility development should be kept inland away from the water's edge, except where appropriate in high intensive shoreline use areas. LUP72 The provision of adequate public shoreline recreation lands should be based on an acquisition plan with a clear public intent. LUP73 A balanced variety of recreational opportunities should be provided for people of different ages, health, family status, and financial ability. a. Appropriatespecialized recreation facilities should be provided for the developmentally disabled, or others who might need them. 'Pursuant to Federal Way City Code Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18-163, a "Class I beach means a beach or shore having dependable, geologically fully developed, and normally dry backshore above high tide." Revised 2002 11-33 FWCP - Chapter Two, land Use b. Shoreline recreation areas should provide opportunities for different use intensities ranging from low (solitude) to high (many people). c. Opportunities for shoreline recreational experiences should include developing access that accommodates a range of differences in people's physical mobility, capabilities, and skill levels. d. Shoreline recreational experiences should include a wide range of different areas from remote/outdoor undeveloped areas to highly developed indoor/ outdoor areas. e. Recreational development should meet the demands of population growth consistent with the carrying capacity of the land and water resources. Circulation Element An element dealing with the location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, and other public facilities; and coordinating those facilities with the shoreline use elements. Goal LUG13 Circulation systems in shoreline areas should be limited to those that are shoreline dependent or would serve shoreline dependent uses. The physical and social environment shall be protected from the adverse effect of those systems on the quality of water, life, or environment. Policies LUP74 New surface transportation development should be designed to provide the best possible service with the least possible infringement upon the shoreline environment. a. New transportation facilities and improvements to existing facilities that substantially increase levels of air, noise, odor, visual, or water pollution should be discouraged. b. Transportation corridors should be designed to harmonize with the topography and other natural characteristics of the shoreline through which they traverse. b. Surface transportation facilities in shoreline areas should be set back from the ordinary high water mark far enough to make unnecessary such protective measures as rip-rap or other bank stabilization, landfill, Revised 2002 11-34 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use bulkheads, groins, jetties, or substantial site regrade. LUP75 Circulation systems should be located and attractively designed so as not to unnecessarily or unreasonably pollute the physical environment or reduce the benefits people derive from their property; and they should encourage alternative routes and modes of travel. a. Motorized vehicular traffic on beaches and other natural shoreline areas should be prohibited. b. Transportation facilities providing access to shoreline developments should be planned and designed in scale and character with the use proposed. c. Circulation routes should provide for non-motorized means of travel. LUP76 Circulation systems disruptive to public shoreline access and other shoreline uses should be relocated where feasible. a. Transportation elements disruptive to the shoreline character that cannot feasibly be relocated should be conditioned or landscaped to minimize visual and noise pollution. L UP77 Shoreline circulation systems should be adaptable to changes in technology. a. Federal Way should promote and encourage modes of transportation that consume the least amount of energy while providing the best efficiency with the least possible pollution. LUP78 General policies. a. New transportation developments in shoreline areas should provide turnout areas for scenic stops and off road rest areas where the topography, view, and natural features warrant. b. Shoreline roadway corridors with unique or historic significance, or of great aesthetic quality, should be retained and maintained for those characteristics. c. New transportation facilities crossing lakes, streams, or wetlands should be encouraged to locate in existing corridors, except where any adverse impact can be minimized by selecting an alternate corridor. Residential Element An element dealing with housing densities, residential subdivisions, shoreline access, necessary support services, and locations of single-family dwellings (including Revised 2002 11-35 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use manufactured homes) and multiple-family dwellings without distinction between part-time or full-time occupancy. Goal LUG14 Shoreline residential areas shall permit a variety of housing types and designs with densities and locations consistent with the ability of physical and natural features to accommodate them. Policies LUP79 Residential developments should be excluded from shoreline areas known to contain development hazards or which would adversely impact sensitive areas as identified in Chapter 18, Division 6 of the FWCc. a. Residential development should be prohibited within the 100-year floodplain. b. Residential development should be prohibited in areas of severe or very severe landslide hazard. c. Residential development should be regulated in shoreline areas with slopes of 40 percent or greater. d. Shoreline areas containing other potential hazards (e. g., geological conditions, unstable subsurface conditions, erosion hazards, or groundwater or seepage problems) should be limited or restricted for development. e. The burden of proof that development of these areas is feasible, safe, and ecologically sound is the responsibility of the developer. LUP80 Residential developments should have minimal impact on the land and water environment of the shoreline and minimize visual and physical obstruction. a. Residential development should be regulated in identified unique and fragile areas as required under the City's sensitive areas regulations. b. Residential development on piers or over water should not be permitted. c. Landfill for residential development which reduces water surface or floodplain capacity should not be permitted. d. In residential developments the water's edge should be kept free of buildings and fences. e. Every reasonable effort should be made to insure the retention of natural shoreline vegetation and other natural features of the landscape during site Revised 2002 11-36 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use development and construction. LUP81 Residential use of shorelines should not displace or encroach upon shoreline dependent uses. LUP82 Residential densities should be determined with regard for the physical capabilities of the shoreline areas, public services requirements, and effects such densities have on the environment. a. Subdivisions and new development should be designed to adequately protect the water and shoreline aesthetic characteristics. b. New residential development should only be allowed in those shoreline areas where the provision for sewage disposal and drainage ways are of such a standard that adjoining water bodies would not be adversely affected by pollution or siltation. c. Residential development along shorelines should be set back trom the ordinary high water mark far enough to make unnecessary such protective measures as filling, bulk heading, construction groins or jetties, or substantial regrading of the site. d. Residential developments should be designed to enhance the appearance of the shoreline and not substantially interfere with the public's view and access to the water. Shoreline Environments Purpose In order to more effectively implement the goals, objectives, and policies of this master program and the SMA, the shorelines of the state within Federal Way have been categorized into four separate environment designations. The purpose of these designations is to differentiate between areas whose geographical features and existing development pattern imply differing objectives regarding their use and future development. Each environment represents a particular emphasis in the type of uses and the extent of development that should occur within it. The system is designed to encourage uses in each environment which enhance the character of the environment while at the same time requiring reasonable standards and restrictions on development so that the character of the environment is not destroyed. The determination as to which designation should be given to any specific shoreline area has been based on, and is reflective of, the existing development pattern; the biophysical capabilities and limitations of the land; and the goals and aspirations of the local citizenry. Each environment category includes: (1) a definition describing the development, use, Revised 2002 11-37 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use and/or features which characterize the area; (2) a purpose which clarifies the meaning and intent of the designation; and, (3) general policies designed to regulate use and development consistent with the character of the environment. Urban Environment The urban environment is an area of high-intensity land use including residential, office, and recreational development. The environment is particularly suitable to those areas presently subjected to intensive land use pressure, as well as areas planned to accommodate urban expansion. The purpose of designating the urban environment is to ensure optimum utilization of shorelines within urbanized areas by permitting intensive use and by managing development so that it enhances and maintains the shoreline for a multiplicity of urban uses. The environment is designed to reflect a policy of increasing utilization and efficiency of urban areas, promote a more intensive level of use through redevelopment of areas now underutilized, and encourage multiple use of the shoreline if the major use is shoreline dependent. Policies LUP83 LUP84 LUP85 LUP86 LUP87 LUP88 LUP89 Emphasis should be given to development within already developed areas. Emphasis should be given to developing visual and physical access to the shoreline in the urban environment. To enhance the waterfÌ"ont and insure maximum public use, commercial facilities should be designed to permit pedestrian waterfÌ"ont activities consistent with public safety and security. Multiple use of the shoreline should be encouraged. Redevelopment and renewal of substandard areas should be encouraged in order to accommodate future users and make maximum use of the shoreline resource. Aesthetic considerations should be actively promoted by means of sign control regulations, architectural design standards, landscaping requirements, and other such means. Development should not significantly degrade the quality of the environment, including water quality and air quality, nor create conditions that would accentuate erosion, drainage problems, or other adverse impacts on adjacent environments. Rural Environment The rural environment is intended for shoreline areas characterized by agricultural uses, low density residential (where most urban services are not available), and areas which Revised 2002 11-38 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use provide buffer zones and open space between predominantly urban areas. Undeveloped shorelines not planned for urban expansion or which do not have a high priority for designation in an alternative environment, and recreational uses compatible with agricultural activities are appropriate for the rural environment. The purpose of designating the rural environment is to preserve agricultural land, restrict intensive development along undeveloped shorelines, function as a buffer between urban areas, and maintain open spaces and opportunities for recreational uses within the ecological carrying capacity of the land and water resource. New developments in a rural environment should reflect the character of the surrounding area by limiting density, providing permanent open space, and maintaining adequate building setbacks from the water to prevent shoreline resources from being destroyed for other rural types of uses. Policies LUP90 LUP91 Recreational access to the shorelines should be encouraged. Recreational facilities should be located and designed to minimize conflicts with other activities. New development should reflect the character of the surrounding area by limiting residential density, providing permanent open space, and maintaining adequate building setbacks from the water. Conservancy Environment The conservancy environment consists of shoreline areas that are primarily free from intensive development. It is the most suitable designation for shoreline areas of high scenic or historical values, for areas unsuitable for development due to biophysical limitations, and for commercial forest lands. Conservancy areas are intended to maintain their existing character. This designation is designed to protect, conserve, and manage existing natural resources and valuable historic and cultural areas. The preferred uses are those which are nonconsumptive of the physical and biological resources of the area. Policies LUP92 LUP93 LUP94 LUP95 New development should be restricted to those that are compatible with the natural and biophysical limitations of the land and water. Diverse recreational activities that are compatible with the conservancy environment should be encouraged. Development that would be a hazard to public health and safety, or would materially interfere with the natural processes, should not be allowed. The flood hazard overzone regulations shall apply to development within flood plains. Revised 2002 11-39 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP96 Structural flood control devices should be strongly discouraged in the conservancy environment. LUP97 In areas with poorly draining soils, development should not be allowed unless connected to a sewer line. LUP98 Development should be regulated so as to minimize the following: erosion or sedimentation, the adverse impact on aquatic habitats, and substantial degradation of the existing character of the conservancy environment. Natural Environment The natural environment consists of areas characterized by the presence of some unique natural features considered valuable in their undisturbed or original condition and which are relatively intolerant of intensive human use. Such areas should be essentially free from development or be capable of being easily restored to natural condition, and they should be large enough to protect the value of the resource. The purpose of designating the natural environment is to preserve and restore those natural resource systems existing relatively free of human influence. These systems require severe restrictions of intensities and types of uses permitted so as to maintain the integrity of the natural environment. Policies LUP99 Natural areas should remain free from all development that would adversely affect their natural character. LUPIOO The intensity and type of uses permitted should be restricted in order to maintain the natural systems and resources in their natural condition. LUPIOI Limited access should be allowed to those areas in the natural environment. LUPIO2 Uses which are consumptive of the physical and biological resources, or which may degrade the actual or potential value of the natural environment, should be prohibited. LUPIO3 Uses and activities in locations adjacent to natural areas should be strictly regulated to insure that the integrity of the natural environment is not compromised. Shoreline Use Activities Purpose Shoreline use activities are specific uses, or groups of similar uses, that have been outlined by the Department of Ecology Final Guidelines as being characteristic of the shorelines of the state. They have been formulated as implementing tools to further carry out the intent Revised 2002 11-40 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use and policy of this master program and the SMA. They also represent a major criterion to be used in evaluating proposed development and alterations to the shoreline environment; with their ultimate influence, to a large extent, dependent upon how well they are enforced. The policies that make up each use activity have been founded on the premise that all reasonable and appropriate uses require regulatory control. Other provisions such as a view enhancement, public access, erosion control, water quality, long term benefits, and aesthetic considerations have also been reflected in policy statements. Shoreline uses and activities not specifically identified, and for which policies have not been developed, will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and will be required to meet the intent ofthe goals and objectives of this master program, the policy of the SMA, and shall be consistent with the management policy and character of the shoreline environment in which they propose to locate. Aquatic Resource Practices Of all facets of economic shoreline activity, production from fisheries is the most vulnerable to massive destruction from an error in environmental control. Close monitoring of water quality and an aggressive policy of pollution abatement and control are mandatory for full realization and sustenance of this economic base. Aquaculture addresses state hatcheries, commercial hatcheries and beds, and natural hatcheries and beds within Federal Way shorelines. Underwater aquaria are considered as aquaculture although the use is principally recreational. Aquaculture has two modes: 1. The harvest of uncontained plant and animal populations that exist on the nutrients and foods available in the environment restock themselves according to the fecundity of the population, and survive as the food and nature allow. 2. Artificial stocking or raising of stock in feedlots or pens using selective breeding and controlled feeding programs for increasing production and rearing a uniform product. Pen culture requires confinement and the presence of fixed structures that compete for space. Pens, rafts, and hatcheries require certain environmental conditions to assure the survival of their contained populations. Some of these conditions are small wave forces, good flow, good water quality, temperature limits, good anchoring ground and accessibility, and, possibly, good natural food and nutrient supply. The confinement of fish or shellfish in concentration imposes an extreme biological load in a small area. Dense populations degrade water quality and deposit heavy fecal sediments below the pens or on the floor of embayments. The principal impacts of aquacultural activity within the shoreline are: Revised 2002 11-41 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use 1. Pollutants in the water body such as fish, organic wastes, and additives for feeding and disease control. 2. Navigation hazards such as holding pens, rafts, nets, and stakes. 3. Watercourse alteration to supply water. 4. Netting and flooring of riverbeds for spawning channels. 5. Shoreline access limitations where shellfish are being protected and contained. Policies LUPI04 Federal Way's support should be given to the State Departments of Fisheries and Game to improve stream conditions, open new spawning areas, and establish new fish runs. LUPI05 Pens and structures for commercial aquaculture should not be located on Class I beaches, or swimming beaches. L UPI 06 Aquacultural enterprises should be located in areas that would not significantly restrict navigation. LUPI07 In aquaculture enterprises, development of multiple aquaculture systems should be encouraged. LUPI08 Aquacultural structures should use open pile construction where significant littoral drift occurs. L UPI 09 Prior to use of an area for aquacultural enterprises, consideration should be given to the capability of the water body to absorb potential wastes. L UPll 0 Shoreline areas having extremely high natural potential for aquaculture should be preserved for that purpose. Commercial Development Commercial development pertains generally to the use or construction of facilities for transaction and sale of goods and services as opposed to industrial development (treatment together with ports) which pertains to the design and fabrication of products. The principal impact factors upon the shoreline from commercial development are pollutants (e.g., erosion, sedimentary, chemical, and microbial) and aesthetic destruction. Erosive pollutants from commercial development are generated from surface runoff and both surface and sub-surface subsidence. Chemical pollution is derived from fuel spillage. Microbial loading arises from poor containment of organic wastes associated with human habitation and recreational activities. Revised 2002 11-42 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Policies LUPll1 Consideration should be made of the effect a structure will have on scenic value. LUPl12 Commercial structures and ancillary facilities that are not shoreline dependent or water-oriented should be placed inland away from the immediate water's edge. LUP113 The use of porous materials should be encouraged for paved areas to allow water to penetrate and percolate into the soil. Use of holding systems should be encouraged to control the runoff rate from parking lots and rooftops. LUP114 Commercial enterprises locating within shoreline areas should be constructed to withstand normal rain and flooding conditions without contributing pollution to the watercourse or shoreline. LUPl15 Commercial development that is not shoreline dependent should provide a buffer zone of vegetation for erosion control. Utilities Few, if any, utility systems could be installed completely without coming under the jurisdiction of this master program. The focus of the policies in this section is on how these utility facilities within the shoreline environment can be planned, designed, constructed, maintained, and rehabilitated to be consistent with the intent of the SMA. Types of utility facilities in Federal Way vary from regional transmission by trunklines, pipelines, and transmission lines to subregional distribution facilities. These are essentially pipes and wires. Regional facilities generally are high voltage or high pressure systems with substantial potential impact in case of failure. Their impacts on the environment are also generally greater because of their scale and safety requirements. The types of utilities covered are communications (radio, TV, and telephone), energy distribution (petroleum products, natural gas, and electricity), water, sanitary sewers, and storm sewers. Policies LUP116 Utilities that lead to growth should not be extended into or along shorelines without prior approval of such extension by appropriate land use authority. L UPl17 Utilities located in shoreline environments inappropriate for development should not make service available to those areas. LUP118 In developed shorelines not served by utilities, utility construction should be encouraged to locate where it can be shown that water quality will be maintained or improved. Revised 2002 11-43 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUPl19 Federal Way should be consulted prior to, or at the time of, application for construction of regional utility facilities to be located in or along shorelines. LUP120 Utility corridors crossing shorelines of the state should be encouraged to consolidate and concentrate or share rights-of-way where: a. Public access (including view) would be improved. b. Concentration or sharing would not hinder the ability ofthe utility systems to be installed, operated, or maintained safely. c. Water quality would be as good or better than if separate corridors were present. LUP121 Public access consistent with public safety and security should be encouraged where rights-of-way for regional utility facilities cross shorelines of the City. LUP122 New utility facilities should be located so as neither to require extensive shoreline protection nor to restrict water flow, circulation, or navigation. LUP123 Utility facilities and rights-of-way should be selected to preserve the natural landscape and minimize conflicts with present and planned uses of the land on which they are located. LUP124 New utility routes should be designed to minimize detrimental visual impact from the water and adjacent uplands. LUP12S New freestanding personal wireless service facilities are discouraged from locating within the shoreline environment. Shoreline Protection Shoreline protection is action taken to reduce adverse impacts caused by current, flood, wake, or wave action. This action includes all structural and nonstructural means to reduce these impacts due to flooding, erosion, and accretion. Specific structural and nonstructural means included in this use activity are bulkheads, rip-rap, bank stabilization, and other means of shoreline protection. The means taken to reduce damage caused by erosion, accretion, and flooding must recognize the positive aspects of each, so that the benefits of these natural occurrences will be retained, even as the problems are dealt with. Erosion does not exist without accretion of material eroded, be it a bench or a sandbar. Likewise, accretion cannot occur unless material has been eroded. Policies LUP126 Structural solutions to reduce shoreline damage should be allowed only after it is demonstrated that nonstructural solutions would not be able to reduce the Revised 2002 11-44 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use damage. LUP127 Planning of shoreline protection should encompass sizable stretches of lake or marine shorelines. This planning should consider off-site erosion, accretion, or flood damage that might occur as a result of shoreline protection structures or activities. LUP12S . Shoreline protection on marine and lake shorelines should not be used as the reason for creating new or newly usable land. LUP129 Shoreline protection structures should allow passage of ground and surface waters into the main water body. LUP130 Shoreline protection should not reduce the volume and storage capacity of rivers and adjacent wetlands or flood plains. LUP131 Whenever shoreline protection is needed, bioengineered alternatives such as natural berms and erosion control vegetation plans should be favored over hard surfaced structural alternatives such as concrete bulkheads and sheet piles. LUP132 The burden of proof for the need for shoreline protection to protect existing or proposed developments rests on the applicant. LUP133 Shoreline protection activities that may necessitate new or increased shoreline protection on the same or other affected properties where there has been no previous need for protection should be discouraged. LUP134 New development should be encouraged to locate so as not to require shoreline protection. LUP135 Areas of significance in the spawning, nesting, rearing, or residency of aquatic and terrestrial biota should be given special consideration in reviewing of shoreline protection actions. LUP136 Shoreline protection actions should be discouraged in areas where they would block beach parent material. LUP137 Multiple uses of shoreline protection structures or nonstructural solutions should be encouraged. Transportation Facilities The circulation network use category addresses transportation facilities such as roads, railroads, bridges, trails, and related facilities. The impact of these facilities on shorelines can be substantial. Some existing facilities were constructed to serve transportation needs of the moment with a minimum expenditure and very little assessment of their primary or secondary impacts on shoreline aesthetics, public access to the water, and resultant effects on adjacent properties and water quality. Planning for new transportation facilities within Revised 2002 11-45 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use the shoreline area today requires a greater awareness of the environmental impacts transportation facilities will have on shorelines, in addition to the necessity for integrating future shoreline land use plans with the transportation system that serves developments on the shoreline. Policies LUP138 Pedestrian access should be built where access to public shorelines is desirable and has been cut off by linear transportation corridors. New linear facilities should enable pedestrian access to public shorelines where access is desirable. LUP139 New surface transportation facilities not related to, and necessary for the support of, shoreline activities should be set back from the ordinary high water mark far enough to make unnecessary protective measures such as rip rap or other bank stabilization, land-fill, bulkheads, groins, jetties, or substantial site regrade. LUP140 Shoreline transportation facilities should be encouraged to include in their design and development multi-modal provisions where public safety can be assured. LUP141 Shoreline transportation facilities should be planned to fit the topography and minimize cuts and fills; and should be designed, located, and maintained to minimize erosion and degradation of water quality and to give special consideration to shoreline aesthetics. LUP142 Transportation and utility facilities should be encouraged to coordinate joint use of rights-of-way and to consolidate crossings of water bodies when doing so can minimize adverse impact to the shoreline. LUP143 Transportation facilities should avoid shoreline areas known to contain development hazards (e.g. slide and slump areas, poor foundation soils, marshes, etc.). LUP144 Transportation facilities should minimize shoreline rights-of-way by orienting generally perpendicular to the shoreline where topographic conditions will allow. LUP145 Shoreline roadways should have a high priority for arterial beautification funds. LUP146 Abandoned road or railroad rights-of-way that contain unique shoreline amenities should be acquired for public benefit. LUP147 Federal Way should extend its trail and bicycle trail system, particularly as it relates to shorelines, to western Federal Way. LUP148 All transportation facilities in shoreline areas should be constructed and maintained to cause the least possible adverse impacts on the land and water Revised 2002 11-46 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use environments, should respect the natural character of the shoreline, and should make every effort to preserve wildlife, aquatic life, and their habitats. Piers and Moorages A pier is a structure built over or floating upon the water extending from the shore. Some are used as a landing place for marine transport or for recreational watercraft. Piers are designed and constructed as either water (floating) or pile supported, both of which have positive and negative environmental aspects. Floating piers generally have less of a visual impact than those on piling and they provide excellent protection for swimmers from boat traffic. Floating piers however, interrupt littoral drift and can starve down current beaches where pile piers do not. Pile piers can provide a diverse habitat for marine life. Both types can create impediments to boat traffic and near-shore trolling. Pier construction requires regulation to protect navigation rights, preserve shoreline aesthetics, and maintain the usable water surface and aquatic lands for life forms characteristic and important to those areas. Policies LUP149 Open pile pier construction should be preferred where there is significant littoral drift, where scenic values will not be impaired, and where minimal alteration to the shoreline and minimal damage to aquatic resources can be assured. LUP150 Floating pier construction should be preferred in those areas where scenic values are high. LUP151 Piers should be discouraged where conflicts with recreational boaters and other recreational water activities would be created by pier construction. LUP152 The random proliferation of single purpose piers should be discouraged. Preference should be given to shared use of piers in all shoreline areas. LUP153 Temporary moorages should be permitted for vessels used in the construction of shoreline facilities. The design and construction of such moorages shall be such that upon termination of the project the aquatic life can be returned to their original condition within one year at no cost to the environment or the public. LUP154 Shoreline structures that are abandoned or structurally unsafe should be abated. LUP155 Substantial additions or alterations, including but not limited to substantial developments, should be in conformance with the policies and regulations set forth in the master program. LUP156 Piers, docks, buoys, and other moorages should only be authorized after consideration of: a. The effect such structures have on wild-life and aquatic life, water quality, scenic and aesthetic values, unique and fragile areas, submerged lands, and shoreline vegetation. Revised 2002 11-47 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use b. The effect such structures have on navigation, water circulation, recreational and commercial boating, sediment movement and littoral drift, and shoreline access. LUP157 Moorage buoys should be preferred over floating and pile constructed piers on all tidal waters. LUP158 Floating structures and open pile structures are preferred over landfills or solid structures in water areas used by salmon and steelhead. Recreation Recreational experiences that depend on, or utilize, the shoreline include: harvesting activities offish, shellfish, fowl, minerals, and driftwood; various fonns of boating, swimming, and shoreline pathways; and watching or recording activities, such as photography, painting, or the viewing of water dependent activities. Principal focal points are at parks and access beaches, road ends, viewpoints, features of special interest, water- access points, and destination points for boaters. Facilities at these focal points may include fishing piers, swimming floats, paths, parking areas, boat ramps, moorings, and accessory recreational facilities. The management of recreational land is detennined by balancing the recreational carrying capacity (or impact of the environment on people) and the ecological carrying capacity (the impact of people on the environment). Measures to accomplish this are by designation of areas for use-intensity, interpretation, and regulation. These different recreational use areas coincide with the four environmentsCnatural, conservancy, rural, and urban. There are multiple benefits derived from the park program, for example: recreational lands contribute substantially to open space by conservation of land, preserving historic sites, offering aesthetic relief and variety, contributing to a healthful environment, and shaping and preserving the community fonn. In addition to the provisions of recreational opportunities, Federal Way coordinates with other governmental agencies, commercial, and volunteer groups to provide these opportunities for the public. The policies are directed toward providing shoreline dependent and water oriented recreational opportunities. They are also directed at protecting health and safety by separating incompatible activities and channeling them into their most appropriate environments. Policies LUP159 The development of recreational acquisition plans should give emphasis to the acquisition of prime recreation lands prior to their being preempted for other uses. LUP160 In open spaces having an established sense of nature, improvements should be limited to those that are necessary and unlikely to detract from the primary values of the site. LUP161 The siting of all developments should aim to enhance and protect the area Revised 2002 11-48 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use concerned. LUPI62 Structural fonns should hannonize the topography, reinforce the use area, minimize damage to natural resources, and support recreation with minimal conflict. LUP163 New buildings should be made sympathetic to the scale, fonn, and proportion of older development to promote hannony in the visual relationships and transitions between new and older buildings. LUPI64 Whenever possible, natural materials should be used in developing shoreline recreational areas. LUPI65 Artificial irrigation and fertilization should be restricted to high-intensity use areas. LUPI66 Existing buildings that enhance the character of the shoreline should be used for recreation wherever possible. LUP167 Underwater parks should be extensions of shoreline parks, or be created or enhanced by artificial reefs where natural conditions or aquatic life could be observed with minimal interference. LUP168 Public recreational shoreline areas should serve as emergency havens ofrefuge for boaters. LUPI69 Physical and/or visual access to the water should use steep slopes, view points from bluffs, stream valleys, and features of special interest where it is possible to place pathways consistent with public safety without requiring extensive flood or erosion protection. LUPI70 The acquisition of public easements to the shoreline through private or quasi- public shorelines should be encouraged. LUP17I Existing public recreation shorelines should be restored where it is possible to revegetate; resite roads and parking areas that are close to the shoreline; and remove stream channelization and shoreline protection devices when the facility has either deteriorated or is inconsistent with the general goals of this program. LUPIn Prime-fishing areas should be given priority for recreational use. LUPI73 Boating activities that increase shore erosion should be discouraged. LUPI74 Effective interpretation should be provided to raise the quality of visitor experiences and provide an understanding of the resource. Residential Development Revised 2002 11-49 FWCP - Chapter Two, land Use The shorelines in Federal Way are more widely used for residential purposes than for any other use. Much of the undeveloped shoreline is privately owned, subdivided into small lots, and zoned to pennit residential development. The pressure to develop shorelines for residential uses has continued to result in property subdivision and escalating waterfront land values. Residential development of shorelines is accomplished in a variety of ways from large plats and subdivisions to single lot development for housing; any of which, if poorly planned, can culminate in the degradation of the shoreline environment and water resource. . The SMA generally exempts, ".. . construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single-family residence for his own use or the use of his family..." from its pennit requirements. However, even though single-family homes are not considered substantial developments, the intent of the act has established the basis for planning and regulating them. Policies L UP175 Residential developments should be pennitted only where there are adequate provisions for utilities, circulation, access, site layout, and building design. LUP176 Subdivisions should be designed at a level of density, site coverage, and occupancy compatible with the physical capabilities of the shoreline and water body. LUPI77 Residential development plans submitted for approval should contain provisions for protection of groundwater supplies, erosion control, landscaping, and maintenance of the shoreline integrity. LUP178 Residential subdivisions should be designed so as to protect water quality, shoreline aesthetic characteristics, vistas, and nonnal public use of the water. LUP179 Subdivisions should provide public pedestrian access to the shorelines within the development in accordance with public access element of this master program. LUP180 The established velocity, quantity, and quality of stonnwater discharge should be considered in tenns of the sensitivity of the proposed receiving environment. The disposal mode selected should minimize changes in infiltration, runoff, and groundwater recharge. LUP181 Developers of recreational projects such as summer homes, cabins, campgrounds, and similar facilities should satisfactorily demonstrate: a. The suitability of the site to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting the shoreline environment and water resource. Revised 2002 II-50 FWCP - Chapter Two, land Use b. Adequate provisions for all necessary utilities, including refuse disposal, and the compatibility of the development with adjacent properties and surrounding land uses. c. That recreational opportunity exists on the site and does not depend on adjacent public land to furnish the activity. 2.9 ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES Pursuant to the GMA, no comprehensive plan can preclude the siting of essential public facilities and each should include a process for siting essential public facilities. The GMA includes these provisions because siting certain public facilities has become difficult due to the impacts many of these facilities have on the community. In Chapter 22 of the FWCC, the City has defined essential public facilities and provided a land use process for siting them. Essential public facilities include those facilities that are typically difficult to site, such as airports, state or regional transportation systems, correctional facilities, and mental health facilities. Policy LUP182 The FWCC shall include a list oflocally defined essential public facilities that shall include the list of essential state public facilities maintained by the office of financial management. 2.10 PHASING Phasing focuses growth to those areas where public investments for services are targeted. By doing so, these areas become more attractive for development. Consistent with the CWPPs, Federal Way proposes to use a tiered system for accommodating future growth. The primary purpose of this technique is to assure a logical sequence of growth outward from developed areas. Future growth will be directed to the City Center and other areas with existing infrastructure and urban services. This will be followed by focusing growth to areas where in-fill potential exists. Lastly, growth will be directed toward areas of undeveloped land or to the City's P AA. For those areas of the City that are lacking services, these lands should be retained or reserved until build out has occurred in developed areas. Based on the phased growth concept outlined above, the City should develop criteria for a phasing plan over the next 10 and 20 years. Phased growth will promote efficient use of Revised 2002 II-51 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use land by: # Reducing taxpayers costs by locating new development nearest to existing urban servIces; # Adding predictability to service & facility planning; # Reducing commuter miles and protecting air quality by locating housing and jobs near each other; # Encouraging in-fill and redevelopment where environmental impacts have already occurred; and # Reserving land for future parks and open space. Policies LUP183 Establish priority areas for public facility and service improvements, especially for transportation. Priority areas should be located where public facility and service improvements would effectively advance Federal Way's growth vision. Priority areas will shift over time as improvements are installed and an acceptable level of service is attained. LUP184 When and where service deficiencies are identified, the City, along with service providers, will develop capital improvement programs to remedy identified deficiencies in a timely fashion or will phase growth until such programs can be completed. L UP185 Work with King County through the development of an interlocal agreement to assign phasing to the City's P AA. LUP186 The City should limit spending on capital facilities in those areas of the City and P AA that are not designated as priority areas for capital projects. 2.11 INCENTIVES In certain designations, incentives allowing more development than otherwise permitted should be used to encourage features that provide a public benefit and/or contribute to the mitigation of growth impacts. For example, development in the City Center that provides common open space or affordable housing units, may gain additional floors or a reduction in the number of parking stalls. In addition, in order to encourage development in the City Center, the City is in the process of discussing a Housing Tax Exemption for multiple Revised 2002 II-52 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use family housing and is considering preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a portion ofthe City Center. Incentives can play an important role in the development of the City Center and must be substantial enough to influence market conditions by making them attractive to the development community. Policies LUP187 Develop incentives to encourage desired development in commercial areas, especially in the City Center Core and Frame. LUP188 Consider incentives for desired multiple-family residential development (townhouses, duplexes, etc.). 2.12 HISTORIC RESOURCES Historic preservation involves the identification, maintenance, renovation, and reuse of buildings and sites important to a community's history. Buildings or sites may be associated with a particular style or period in the community's past, or with historic or significant historic events or persons. Historic preservation to date has largely been undertaken by the Historical Society of Federal Way. Historic preservation is listed as the 13th goal in the GMA which encourages jurisdictions to, "Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance. " Goal LUG15 Use historic resources as an important element in the overall design of the City. Policies LUP189 Identify vista points and landmarks such as major trees, buildings, and land forms for preservation. LUP190 Develop a process to designate historic landmark sites and structures. Use developer incentives or other mechanisms to ensure that these sites and structures will continue to be a part of the community. LUP191 Recognize the heritage of the community by naming (or renaming) parks, streets, and other public places after major figures and/or events. LUP192 Zoning should be compatible with and conducive to continued preservation of historic neighborhoods and properties. Revised 2002 II-53 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP193 Safeguard and manifest Federal Way's heritage by preserving those sites, buildings, structures, and objects which reflect significant elements of the City's history. LUP194 Catalog historic sites using the City's geographic information system. LUP195 Undertake an effort to publicly commemorate historic sites. LUP196 The City shall continue to work with the Historical Society of Federal Way towards attainment of historic resource policies. 2.13 IMPLEMENTATION The following actions are recommended to implement the policy direction outlined in this chapter. Implementation will occur over time and is dependent on resources available to the City and community. The following items are not listed in order of importance or preference. Establish Comprehensive Planning and Zoning for Potential Annexation Area Comprehensive planning and the assignment of zoning designations should be completed for the City's P AA. This will provide the City with needed direction relating to future annexations and growth. Planning for this area pursuant to WAC 365-195 requires a considerable planning effort and policy development. An interlocal agreement between King County and the City regarding planning actions should be prepared. Residential Code Revisions for Multiple Family Residential code revisions to implement design standards for multiple-family residential development were adopted in late 1998. Subdivision Code Revisions Amendments to the subdivision code have been adopted to bring the code into compliance with state law and recent state legislation. Revisions to the subdivision code have provided platting options for single-family development, such as clustering and zero lot line development. Area-Wide Rezone Following adoption of the 1995 FWCP, a new zoning map was prepared and adopted to support the comprehensive plan designations. This update includes some site specific requests for changes to comprehensive plan designations. The zoning map will be amended to conform to the changes in land use designations. The Land Use Plan and Zoning Code Revised 2002 II-54 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Implementation of policies and goals of the Land Use chapter is done in large part through the zoning code. Following adoption of the 1995 FWCP, the City made revisions to the zoning code, consistent with FWCP direction. The zoning conversion chart, Table 11-3 (page 55), shows the connection between the various zoning designations and the comprehensive plan designations. Phasing Plan A phasing plan shall be prepared to prioritize areas of new growth based on available and proposed infrastructure improvements. Project Environmental Impact Statement for City Center To facilitate growth in the City Center and Frame, the City should complete Planned Action SEP A (PAS). By doing so, development consistent with the direction outlined in the PAS will not have to go through prolonged environmental review. This can be a powerful incentive for private development in the City Center. Subarea Plans Over the years, citizens from various areas of the City have come forth to testify before the Planning Commission and City Council regarding their neighborhood or business area. Development of subarea plans can lead to area specific visions and policies. This type of specific planning, developed with citizen input and direction, can lead to improved confidence and ownership in the community. Areas where subarea planning should be considered include: SR-99 Corridor, South 34Sth Street area, and Twin Lakes neighborhood. Incentives Develop an incentives program, for both residential and commercial development. Incentives should be substantial enough to attract development and should be used to create affordable and desired types of housing and to encourage development within the City Center. U Table II-3 Land Use Classifications Comprehensive Plan Classification Zoning Classification Single Family - Low Density Residential Suburban Estates (SE), one dwelling unit per five acres Single Family - Medium Density Residential RS 35,000 & 15,000 Single Family - High Density Residential RS 9600, 7200, 5000 Multiple Family Residential RM 3600, 2400, 1800 City Center Core City Center Core City Center Frame City Center Frame Office Park Office Park, Office Park 1, 2, & 3 Professional Office Professional Office Community Business Community Business Business Park Business Park Revised 2002 II-55 FWCP - Chapter Two, land Use Neighborhood Business Neighborhood Business Corporate Park Corporate Park-l Commercial Recreation Office Park-4 Open Space & Parks A variety of zoning is assigned. Revised 2002 II-56 ~ir-' PugelS(}Una "'-- .., CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNA TlaNS REVISED MARCH, 2003 LANDUSE ELEMENT ,"',' Federal Way City Umits /" ' Potential Aonexation Area - City Center Core - City Center Frame - Corporate Park IiIIIIIIII Office Park ~ Professional Office I!æI CommerciaJlRecreation E:::J Business Park - Neighborhood Business - Community Business - Pai~ and Open Space - Multi-Family c::=:J Single Family-High Density ~ Single Family.Medium Density c::=:J Single Family-Low Density -SCALE- 1 Inch equals 3.750 Fe'" ~ Federal Way MAP 11-1 NOTE: This map is inten~od lor use as a graphical representation anly. 1111 City aI Fadlral Way mat. no warranty 1& mils atCuru:y M.'0fI"'d"brl8~2",," ,_lit""""""""",,¡ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GENERALIZED EXISTING LAND USE LANDUSE ELEMENT ,., Federal Way City Umits /" Potential AnnexaUon Area ",,' OtherCityLimits /V County Boundary ,,' Federal Way City Center iOCS Agriculture - Commercial - Industñal - Office I!!!!!!I!IJ Public Park GIll R86ldentlal- Multi-Family c:J R86idential. Single Family [2]Ell Open Space, Common Areas, and Drainage - Quasi Public (i.e. sdlools. government services. ete.) [[]JD Vacant I'&'Si!!J Recreation .. Utilities ......., Kin. eo..rty .._~. """"""".n"" ""-M. ¡""cj_~_n""'- 1:".~It:,~_n -SCALE- , III"" _all 4,000 Flot ~. Federal Way MAP 11-2 NOTE: This map is intended fur use as a graphical representation anly, lb. CIIy CII F!deral Way mat.. no warr""IY IS 111 hi accUI1J:Y U."r"""'Ap~2JJ112 '_1>8"'","...""""..' EXHIBIT c ...... CHAPTER FOUR - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4.0 INTRODUCTION The Growth Management Act (GMA) includes economic development as one of its basic goals and it is a theme that runs throughout the GMA. It considers the need to stimulate economic development throughout the state, but requires that these activities be balanced with the need to protect the physical environment. It encourages the efficient use of land, . the availability of urban services, and the financing strategies necessary to pay for infrastructure. Finally, the GMA mandates that communities do their planning and then provide the zoning and regulatory environment so that appropriate development can occur. It recognizes that while the public sector can shape and influence development, it is the private sector that generates community growth. The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) has also adopted region-wide goals and objectives to guide multi-jurisdictional transportation and land use policies that will be implemented through local comprehensive plans. Economic development is implicit in many ofthe goals and objectives of VISION 2020. The VISION 2020 strategy emphasizes that continued economic stability and diversity is dependent upon public and private sector collaboration to identify needs, such as infrastructure and land, and to invest in services that will promote economic activity. VISION 2020 also emphasizes that the stability of the regional economy increases when it develops and diversifies through the retention and strengthening of existing businesses and the creation of new business. King County, through its growth management planning policies and process, re- emphasizes the economic development implications of growth management. The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs) promote the creation of a healthy and diverse economic climate. The CWPPs describe the need to strengthen, expand, and diversify the economy. They encourage protection of our natural resources and enhancement of our human resources through education and job training. The CWPPs also speak to the need to make an adequate supply of land available for economic development by providing necessary infrastructure and a reasonable permitting process. Within this policy framework, Federal Way has outlined a vision of its economic development future. Its vision is to transform itself from largely a bedroom-community of Seattle into a diversified, full-service, and self-contained city (Map IV-J, located at the end of the chapter). However, in doing so, it is important to remember that Federal Way is part of the larger Puget Sound economy, and therefore, this transformation will depend in large part on the market forces at work within the greater region. To achieve this vision, the City must diversify its employment base by adding more professional and managerial jobs, and by increasing the overall number of jobs in order to improve the balance between jobs and households in the City. The potential is there. Federal Way's unique location between the two regional centers of Seattle and Tacoma, both with large concentrations of population and large, successful ports, and its relationship within the FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Central Puget Sound region represent significant opportunities. The City is also home to Weyerhaeuser's Corporate Headquarters, located within East Campus, and the West Campus Office Park, two of the premier office park areas in the region. In addition, the City holds unique regional attractions for entertainment and recreation, such as Celebration Park, King County Aquatic Center, and Six Flags Enchanted Parks/Wild Waves. The City's economic development vision is based on the following: 1) economic and demographic analysis; 2) market analysis oflong-term real estate development in Federal Way; 3) synthesis ofreal estate and development trends in the Central Puget Sound area; and 4) review and comment from the Planning Commission. 4.1 SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS Overview Since the last update to this chapter of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), there have been significant changes in the local, regional, national, and international economic conditions. Previously riding a sustained, strong economic wave associated with extraordinary growth in the high-tech industries, strong growth in the airline industry, and generally positive national and international perceptions of the Pacific Northwest, the Seattle- Tacoma metropolitan region, and the State of Washington, Washington began to show early signs of an economic downturn by mid-200 1. Riots in nearby Seattle, first associated with the meeting of the World Trade Organization in November 1999, and later with the 2001 Mardi Gras festivities, had begun a series of negative publicity images of Seattle and the Seattle area. This negative publicity was exacerbated by the February 28,2001, Nisqually Earthquake, and later in 2001 by the Boeing Company's announcement that it was moving its corporate headquarters to Chicago. In addition, by mid-200 1, the national economy had begun to slow down, the "dot-com" industry had suffered a generalized melt-down, and the Pacific Rim countries, upon which so much of this state's trade depends, continued to slide further into their own recessions. The effects ofthe September 11,2001, terrorist attacks on this country jolted the economies of most ofthe world's countries and regions, but had a particularly hard impact on the Puget Sound region. As air-travel-related commerce plummeted worldwide, the Boeing Company, its affiliates, and related industries, saw sharp drops in orders, and Boeing announced its intentions to layoff tens of thousands of workers over the ensuing two years. By the beginning of 2002, lay-offs around the Puget Sound region became a commonplace occurrence, stemming from cutbacks at Boeing, other companies related to the airline and travel industries, and numerous "dot-com" and high-tech companies. However, according to the 2002 King County Annual Growth Report, the King County Revised 2002 IV-2 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development economy remains strong despite severe shocks. Unemployment has risen to 6.2 percent as of June 2002, but that level is no worse than the historical average. Aerospace employment in the Puget Sound region now stands at 72,000, with about 47,000 of that in King County. Although well below its record employment levels, the aerospace sector continues to provide high wages to local workers. High tech continues to expand despite the shakeout of a few companies. Other services, wholesale, and retail lost employment before the recession hit aerospace, so they may be ready to grow again in the coming year. The significant overall income growth in software and other sectors propelled King County into eighth place among all 3,100 counties in the United States in total payroll paid during 1998. Measured at $41 billion by the Census Bureau, King County's total business payroll exceeded that of 26 states, including Oregon, which has twice as many people as King County. Among other issues raised by such large numbers is that of the disparity of wealth and income between King County and the other parts of Washington State outside the Puget Sound region. In 1998, more than 52 percent of wages paid in the state were in King County, in contrast to our 29 percent share of the state's population. Some of that difference reflects high tech jobs in Seattle and the Eastside, as well as high wage manufacturing jobs in South King County. Long-range prospects are mixed. Boeing forecasts production of around 250 airplanes this year and next. Sale of those planes will bring in billions of dollars, much of which will be reinvested in the Puget Sound economy. But with the move of Boeing headquarters to Chicago, long-tenn prospects for aerospace are less certain, although the company has continued to emphasize its investment in the Puget Sound region. Sales tax and other government revenues are declining at a time when public investment is needed. The area is doing remarkably well so far, but if these underlying issues are not addressed, there could be lasting consequences to King County and the Puget Sound region. Due to the markedly weaker economic conditions now in the Puget Sound region than during most of the past decade, economic development efforts in Federal Way will have to become more creative, innovative, and broader in scope. The traditional focus on retaining and attracting businesses will not be enough. New efforts, reaching into other economic sectors and using new and innovative strategies, will be necessary. General Patterns of Existing Development Previous development trends indicate that the non-residential areas of Federal Way reflect a community that has the ability to absorb higher density (more compact) uses and greater development as growth in the Central Puget Sound region continues. And even though Federal Way is a new city in a suburban area, much of its future will be tied to redevelopment and transfonnation. Federal Way is characterized by: # High-quality single- and multiple-family residential areas # A range of housing that includes very modest tract homes, manufactured dwellings, and large luxury waterfront homes Revised 2002 IV-3 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development # Auto-oriented, suburban scale regional and community shopping centers and strip centers # Corporate headquarters # Two high-quality business and office parks-West Campus and East Campus # Little developed space for quality business, flex-tech, and office parks # Semi-rural areas, wildlife areas, truck stops, areas without utilities, and much vacant open space # Recreation/amusement parks # A waterfront primarily occupied by high-quality homes, but not particularly accessible to the public # Many marginal commercial areas with redevelopment potential along Pacific Highway South (SR-99) that are vestiges of a prior era Demographics Federal Way historically has been primarily a suburban, bedroom community. It has more households than jobs and as a result, provides more workers to the region than it attracts. However, since the City's incorporation, this balance between homes and jobs has shifted. Based on US Census data, the City's residential population grew by 23 percent from 67,554 in 1990 to 83,259 in 2000, while the City's covered employment has grown by 44 percent from 21,756 in 1990 (as reported by the 2001 King County Annual Growth Report) to 31,315 in 2000 (PSRC's 2000 Covered Employment Estimates). These figures indicate that during the past decade the City has begun to shed its "bedroom community" status, with more opportunities for residents to stay within Federal Way for their employment, as well as becoming more of an employment destination for residents from beyond Federal Way. The 2000 Census information shows that Federal Way's median income levels have grown substantially since 1990, with the City leading the South King County cities in the percentage of wage-earning households, as well as median household income. The 1990 Census reported median household income at $38,311. The figure grew by 29 percent over the decade leading to the 2000 census, with a median household income reported of $49,278, which is higher than the median household incomes of any of the other major South King County cities (Renton, Kent, Burien, Auburn, Tukwila, and SeaTac), as well as Seattle. Revised 2002 IV-4 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Moreover, it is interesting to note that the median household income of wage-earning households (which comprise 87.3 percent of all Federal Way households) was reported at $57,748. This median household income figure is also higher than that of any of the other major South King County cities, as well as higher than the South King County's average of$55,637. Similarly, Federal Way's percentage of wage-earning households (87.3 percent) is higher than any of the other major South King County cities (which range from 79.9 to 86.8 percent). As a result, and given the City's large population, Federal Way has the highest annual gross income of any of the South King County cities. However, Federal Way and the South King County cities continue to lag behind the East King County cities in terms of median household income, which range from $60,332 in Kirkland to $66,735 in Redmond. Federal Way's Regional Role Federal Way is optimally located at a mid-point in the Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan region at the intersection ofI-5 and SR-18, with easy access to the Port of Tacoma, Port of Seattle, and SeaTac International Airport. Federal Way's location is a prime asset as traffic congestion and concerns over personal and freight mobility within the region become paramount issues for commerce and industry, as well as commuters. Nevertheless, the economic boom of the past decade has largely been concentrated in the Eastside communities, Downtown Seattle and South Snohomish County. However, with changes in the high-tech industry, increasing traffic congestion, soaring housing prices, and increasing limits to growth in those areas, the "Southend bias" may become a thing of the past, leaving Federal Way in an even better position from a regional perspective. Economic Base Federal Way's retail base is diverse and attracts customers from outside the City limits. Its market share, however, is relatively low compared to other Southwest King County communities. Although Federal Way retailers capture a good deal of the City's primary and secondary market expenditures for general merchandise and food trade, a high percentage of the local populace goes elsewhere to shop for automobiles, apparel/ accessories, miscellaneous retail purchase, building material, and furniture. Overall, the capture rate for retail sales as a function of the City's primary and secondary trade area total retail expenditures is relatively low, about 51 percent (Federal Way City Center Market Analysis, prepared by ECO Northwest, July 2002). PSRC's 2000 Covered Employment Estimates reported that in 2000, covered employment (those jobs covered by the state's unemployment insurance program) within Federal Way and throughout King County could be broken down as shown in Table IV-I (page 6). As can be seen from this data, in 2000, Federal Way's strongest employment sectors were Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate, and Retail, which exceed the countywide averages considerably. The City had noticeably fewer jobs than average in the Manufacturing and Wholesale, Transportation, Communications, and Utilities sectors. Based on recent events in the employment sector, these numbers may be lower today. Revised 2002 IV-5 FWCP - Chapter Four. Economic Development e era ayan ne; oun ry Employment Category Federal Way Employees Countywide Employees (Percentage) (Percentage) Construction and Resources 1,029 (3.3%) 69,949 (6.1%) Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 13,947 (44.5%) 440,364 (38.3%) Manufacturing 3,103 (9.9%) 147,933 (12.9%) Retail 8,158 (26.1%) 189,457 (16.5%) Wholesale, Transportation, 1,606 (5.1%) 158,307 (13.8%) Communications, and Utilities Education 2,042 (6.5%) 64,454 (5.6%) Government 1,431 (4.6%) 80,542 (7%) Total 31,315 1,151,006 Table IV-l 2000 Covered Employment Estimates F d IW dID C t Market Share Industrial and business park space available to rent in Federal Way is a minuscule share of the Southend/Green River/Seattle market area. The South King County industrial area (including industrial parks, business parks, and flex-tech hybrid business/office parks) is currently the strongest real estate market in Western Washington. The industrial areas of south Seattle, Green River Valley, and Fifeffacoma constitute one of the strongest markets for industrial, warehouse, wholesale, distributing, etc., businesses in the Western United States. The City of Federal Way is in a strategic position to capitalize on these markets by providing prime office space and room for new office development, as well as quality housing. Retail and Lodging Development Developed and opened in 1975, the SeaTac Mall was the primary force behind the growth of retail in Federal Way during the 1980s. After a period of some decline in recent years, SeaTac Mall is currently a prime candidate for updating, redevelopment and/or repositioning to acquire a stronger market position. In 1995, Pavilons Centre replaced the old Federal Way Shopping Center, and in 2001 the Pavilions Center Phase II came on line, with more development at that location yet to come. In 1998, SeaTac Village was given a complete face-lift incorporating the City's commercial design guidelines. In addition, in the late 1990s, a new Walmart store moved into the City Center Frame, and there have been several renovations and remodeling of existing retail structures, including the conversion of the old Safeway building at the southwest comer of South 320th and Pacific Highway into Rite Aid and the old K-Mart into Safeway. Within the last two years, a 45,000 square foot Best Buy has opened in the City Center Frame and a 52,000 square foot Albertson's remodel has occurred in the Community Business zone along Pacific Highway South. Revised 2002 IV-6 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Between 1995 and 2000, four hotels/motels have been constructed in and around the City Center. These include Holiday Inn, Courtyard Marriott, Extended Stay, and Comfort Inn. In addition, a Holiday Inn Express and Sunnyside Motel (Travel Lodge) have been built south ofthe City Center along Pacific Highway. Hawthorne Suites, a 65 unit Country Inn, has been recently constructed along Pacific Highway South in the Community Business zone south of the City Center. Office Development Federal Way's East and West Campus Developments set a standard in the region as two of the best examples of master-planned office campuses in the Pacific Northwest. The quality of development in this area is decidedly different than elsewhere in Federal Way and Southwest King County. Within the last two years, the majority of new office development has been located within Federal Way's East Campus which has seen the following development: Foss Office Building at 108,000 square feet; Capital One Office Building at 143,000 square feet; and Federal Way Office Building and Warehouse at 70,767 square feet. The West Campus area has seen little new office development. Although permits have been issued for additional office development in the West Campus, rising vacancy rates there have stalled additional development for the near term. In the City Center no new additional office development has occurred since the last comprehensive plan update, and office buildings continue to constitute a minority of the City Center's development. Other commercial areas within the City have seen limited amounts of office development, such as the recent Lloyd Enterprises building at 34667 Pacific Highway South. Business Park (Light Industrial) Development There has been no substantive Business Park development since the City's incorporation. This lack of recent Business Park development suggests the influence of market forces outside of the City limits, where cheaper land and established industrial parks act as a draw for prospective business park development. Residential Development One of Federal Way's strengths is the range and quality of its housing stock. The quality, quantity, and range of options for housing are major factors in business siting decisions. According to the 1990 US Census data, the median value of owner-occupied homes in Federal Way was $118,800. In contrast, the average sales price of Federal Way owner- Revised 2002 IV-7 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development occupied homes in 2001, as reported by the King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning, was $194,092, with single-family homes averaging $213,060 and condominiums averaging $112,135. These figures contrast with other King County cities, as outlined in Table IV-2. 2001 A S I P" Table IV-2 fO 0 " dH "Ki c vera2e a es nces 0 wner- ccupìe omes m ng ounty Place All Homes Single-Family Condos Federal Way $194,092 $213,060 $112,135 Auburn $197,965 $216,549 $124,089 Renton $215,341 $248,271 $149,608 Kent $198,844 $222,580 $142,577 Des Moines $206,379 $207,302 $202,142 Seattle $318,671 $342,922 $240,619 King County $295,158 $321,700 $198,822 As one can see ITom the above data, homes in Federal Way are generally more affordable than in the immediately surrounding communities and are far more affordable than homes in Seattle and the Eastside communities. While single-family houses remain Federal Way's dominant housing type, the majority of housing starts since the late 1980s were multiple-family. Multiple-family units as a percentage of all housing units increased ITom less than 10 percent in 1970 to nearly 40 percent in 1990. During the late 1980s, there were twice as many multiple-family housing units constructed in Federal Way than single-family housing units. From 1990 to 1992, permitting of multiple-family construction stopped, and single-family construction slowed to about one-third of late 1980 levels. It is interesting to note than in 1990 median monthly rental rate for Federal Way was $476, while the median monthly rental rate for King County communities varied between $398 and $458. That is, Federal Way's multifamily housing stock was on the higher end of cost within the region. Since then, Seattle and some Eastside locations have become particularly expensive, and Federal Way's multifamily housing stock is substantially more affordable than those locations, while averaging competitively with nearby communities, as seen in Table IV-3 (page 9). Since 1996, the vast majority of multi-family housing development has taken place in the senior/assisted living market. During that time approximately 792 senior or assisted housing units have been added in the City, in addition to 240 skilled-care beds. This is compared with approximately 135 non-senior multifamily housing units. The lack of multi-family construction beyond this sub-market speaks to the recent market forces that appear to have discouraged investment in market rate multi-family development that commands lower rents than the King County average, as seen above. In order for the City to successfully encourage multi-family housing at a rate commensurate with the long range housing targets established under the GMA, City policy must address the market factors unique to this type of development activity. Revised 2002 IV-8 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development A Table IV-3 MI' F .. R s 2002 verage u tI- amlly ellts, ~I rIng Place Two Bedroom! All Units One Bath Federal Way $710 $749 Auburn $684 $7]6 Renton $811 $869 Kent $712 $747 Des Moines $701 $686 North Seattle $852 $787 Queen Anne $1,104 $923 Bellevue-West $1,129 $],200 King County $839 $869 Institutional, Educational, Cultural, and Recreational Development Federal Way enjoys a variety of affordable, high-quality health care. The City boasts three outstanding health care facilities, St. Francis Hospital, Virginia Mason Clinic, and Group Health. These facilities continue to grow and expand in the services they offer the region. In the last two years, Virginia Mason has developed a 30,000 square foot building addition, and St. Francis Hospital is currently constructing a 62,000 square foot addition. Built in 1998, the Knutzen Family provides a venue for professional theatre and the symphony. The Federal Way Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department offers a summer concert series at Steel Lake Park, which is also home to the annual Family Fest celebration. Each year, Federal Way's July 4th Red, White, and Blues festival is held at Celebration Park, where the nationally acclaimed tournament soccer and baseball facilities draw additional tourist activities. Federal Way offers a number of collegiate and vocational opportunities. Highline Community College operates a local branch campus in Federal Way. The Eton Vocation College, located in the heart of Federal Way, is a vocational college focused on job training for today's competitive market. In 2001, the DeVry Institute of Technology opened their first Northwest Campus in Federal Way. This 100,000 square foot facility provides technology training customized to increase employee workplace skills. Summary In summary, Federal Way's role in both the Central Puget Sound area and Southwest King County has been defined by its inventory of prime office space in campus-like settings, wide variety of retail and services, and large stock of quality housing. These basic sectors are enhanced by Federal Way's regional role as a center for amateur Revised 2002 IV-9 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development athletics. Much of the highway oriented commercial space that was developed in the 1970s and 80s in response to rapid population growth has been starting to undergo redevelopment, and this trend will continue. The West Campus and East Campus areas serve as models for the quality of modem commercial, office, and business park space Federal Way will need in order to attract its share offuture regional growth. Urban design and infrastructure in other areas of Federal Way must be brought up to these standards. In addition, the existence of large parcels of land ownership in the 344th/356th area and 3 Iih/324th area ofthe core corridor will give Federal Way a development advantage. Federal Way will continue to foster the development of institutional and cultural amenities designed to enhance the City's regional image as a desirable community offering a high quality environment for living and working. Federal Way's Competitive Position in Southwest King County Subregion While many of the development patterns are set in the Southwest King County subregion, Federal Way and five other cities have seen, or will see, significant change. These additional five cities are Auburn, Kent, Renton, SeaTac, and Tukwila. Table IV-4 (page 11) encapsulates each of these cities' current market niches, as well as their opportunities and challenges, in order to help understand how Federal Way relates to its neighbors. As can be seen in the table, much of the area surrounding Federal Way is dedicated to industrial, light manufacturing, low-scale office parks, wholesale/warehouse, distribution, etc., especially in Auburn and Kent. Much of this is not in direct competition with Federal Way. Tukwila is the major retail center for South King County and provides the region's stiffest competition for regional retailers and retail establishments, such as department and furniture stores, specialty apparel, etc. While the trade area for Tukwila's retail sector is large, Federal Way lies at the most distant point in South King County from the Tukwila/Southcenter retail center, and its trade area overlaps or competes the least with Tukwila. The City of SeaTac provides little competition in the office, industrial, and retail sectors, but has successfully captured the airport-related lodging industry, with several higher-quality establishments, including conference facilities. Renton has historically had a strong economic base tied to the Boeing Company, with both healthy manufacturing and office sectors; however, both of these sectors have seen a substantial weakening with the Boeing Company headquarters relocation, work force lay- offs, and space consolidation. Auburn and Kent have also experienced a substantial increase in vacant light-industrial building space due to Boeing Company reductions. Notwithstanding relative levels of competition from other communities in specific commercial sectors, Federal Way does experience a "competitive" relationship with several nearby municipal governments that must be taken into account. The City of Renton is a recognized leader in the county with respect to economic development, with a particular focus on downtown redevelopment and economic diversification. That city has invested public funds in land assembly projects that have attracted substantial residential, mixed-use, and auto dealership developments. Following Renton's lead are the communities of Kent and Tukwila, which have also targeted key redevelopment opportunities, acquiring/assembling land and attracting desired mixed-use development. Revised 2002 IV-10 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Similarly, Renton and Kent provide tax incentives for certain residential development and provide other financial incentives to desired redevelopment projects. In addition, Tukwila, Renton, and Kent have made substantial personnel and facilities investments in improving customer service and turn-around times associated with development permits. In addition to these five cities in Southwest King County, Tacoma is an important competitor to Federal Way. Tacoma is an older city that has made many efforts to improve its downtown and image for more than a quarter century. Tacoma city government has an aggressive economic development mission and is recognized regionally and nationally as a leader in the field. It has continually devoted its own funds, as well as state and federal grants, to stimulate economic development. Tacoma has a strategic location on the highway system and a strong port with much unrealized potential. In addition, both the city and suburbs have vacant and redevelopable land, as well as relatively cheap accessible land for residential development. Table IV-4 Summary of Economic Conditions in Southwest King County Cities Auburn Federal Way Kent Renton SeaTac Tukwila Current -Industrial areas -Regional mall -Industrial land -Business parks -Airport related -Regional retail Niche -Vacant land -West Campus -Boeing -Mid-rise office -Redevelopable land -Boeing -Regional mall -East Campus -Business parks -Mid-rise office -Redevelopable light -Weyerhaeuser Hdq -Vacant land -Mid- and high-rise industrial -Vacant land & lodging and -Mid-rise office redevelopable land conference centers -Mid-rise and high- rise lodging and conference centers Opportunities -Commuter rail -Weyerhaeuser -Boeing facilities -Boeing & -Adjacent to SeaTac -Strong retail identify -Established office, -West Campus -Commuter rail PACCAR=s mfg. & Airport & concentration business parks, & -East Campus -Established office, office complex -Major HCT -Redevelopment industrial areas -Large concentration business parks & -Mid-rise buildings Stations planned potentia] -Cross-valley hwy of retail industrial areas -Potentia] -One large strategic -Location at cross- connector planned -Land assembled for -Cross-valley hwy redevelopment parcel assembled roads ]-405/1-5 redevelopment connector planned areas -Future hwy - cross- -Boeing office/mfg -Centra] location -Strengthening -Strengthening roads (1-5 & complexes between downtown downtown SR509) !Tom -Proximity to SeaTac Tacoma & Seattle -New Pennit Center -Strong economic Seattle will open Airport & to Port of -1-5/SR 18 and investment in development focus acres for office and Seattle crossroads development -City partnership business parks -Commuter rail -HCT stations revIew resources with private sector Wlanticipated -City partnership in redevelopment -Pennit process rec- with private sector ognized for speed in redevelopment oftumaroWld -City partnership with private sector in redevelopment Challenges -Distance from 1-5 & -Dispersed -Industrial image -Limited retail -Adjacent to SeaTac -Limited vacant land major economic development -No prospect for attractions Airport for business & concentrations pattern HCT -Limited land for -Massive office parks -Low-scale -Not on commuter -Off-center location business & office redevelopment -Freeway access not development rail on SR 167 parks required easy or obvious -Off-center location -Weak downtown -Small land holdings -Not anticipated to -Land assembly -Limited vacant land -Wetlands inCBD be on HCT line required -No obvious center or -Reduction in Boeing -Wetlands -Off-center cross- -Not on commuter focal point within presence; vacant -Reduction in Boeing roads (1-405 & SR rail Tukwila buildings presence; vacant 167) -Limited quality -Limited quality buildings -Reduction in Boeing -residential supply -residential supply presence; vacant -No obvious center buildin~s or focal ooint Revised 2002 IV-11 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development In summary, any program of economic development for Federal Way must monitor conditions and trends in Tacoma and Southwest King County, and act decisively and aggressively to increase the City's strategic position. Summary of Achievements Although the City of Federal Way's economic development efforts are relatively new, several important accomplishments in formulating the City's economic development strategy have already been accomplished. # The City of Federal Way/Federal Way Chamber Economic Development Committee meets monthly to discuss and develop economic development strategies and maintain a close and cooperative working relationship. # The City has developed Celebration Park which, in addition to the recreational amenities for City residents, includes tournament-quality soccer and softball facilities that attract players and tournaments £Tom throughout the Pacific Northwest, thereby contributing substantial economic activity to Federal Way through expenditures for lodging, shopping, dining, and other services. # In 2001 the City officially incorporated an Economic Development Division within the Community Development Services Department and hired a Director. # With increasing lodging tax revenues, the City of Federal Way Lodging Tax Advisory Committee has expanded its work plan to include more direct efforts to stimulate tourism and visitorship to the City. # The City has co-founded and co-manages the South King County Technology Alliance, a working committee of various municipal entities and businesses within South King County dedicated to fostering further development of the technology sector within South King County. # The City has embarked on a concerted effort, led by senior management, to improve permit processes and reduce regulatory hurdles to development. In 2001, the City worked collaboratively with the Federal Way Chamber and other stakeholders to raise the thresholds that trigger right-of-way improvements associated with redevelopment, remodeling, and reuse of existing buildings. In 2002, the City has embarked upon a permit-process improvement effort that includes a public stakeholder advisory committee and study of best practices £Tom around the region, and is intended to place Federal Way at the forefront of regional municipalities in regulating land use and construction effectively and efficiently. Revised 2002 IV-12 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development 4.2 THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT VISION FOR FEDERAL WAY The vision for economic development in Federal Way can be encapsulated into four basic areas: 1) to retain existing businesses and attract new businesses in order to build a diverse economic base; 2) to increase the number of jobs within the City relative to the population of City residents within the labor force; 3) to foster redevelopment of the City Center from a low-scale, suburbanized commercial area to a full-service, high-density, mixed-use, and more pedestrian-friendly urban core and community focal point; and 4) to build upon and expand the City's recreational and cultural assets to increase visitors to the City and encourage greater visitor spending within the local economy. The strategy encourages or accelerates the trends and transformations that are already occurring in this community. The major objectives of the strategy include the following: # Provide a better balance between housing and jobs by increasing the number of jobs within the City relative to the number of households. # Diversify the economic base by encouraging higher paying white collar and technical jobs while preserving and enhancing the strong retail base. # Generate more demand for hotel room-nights through growth in office and business part space. # Foster horizontal mixed-use employment sector growth in the South 348th Street area in the near term (2000-2005). # Foster continued Corporate and Office Park employment sector growth in East and West Campus in the mid-term (2000-2010). It should be noted that East Campus has recently been experiencing a high rate of growth and may reach build out during this time period. # Emphasize private redevelopment and land assembly through the I-5/SR-99 corridor, especially in the City Center, as well as the 348th and 336th areas. # Redevelop and improve the quality of the mixed use development along Pacific Highway South from South 272od Street to South 356th Street (2000-2010). # Foster mid-rise, mixed-use employment sector growth in the City Center (2000- 2020). # Encourage quality development throughout the City to attract desirable economic development in Federal Way. # Maintain and improve the quality and character of the existing residential neighborhoods. Revised 2002 IV.13 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development # Promote high quality, higher density residential neighborhoods in the City Center and Highway 99 corridor in close proximity to jobs and good public transportation. # Continue to work with the lodging providers to promote year-round vistorship to the City to encourage visitor spending as an important component of a growing local economy. # Work with other agencies to provide services for education and training, as well as social services and other remedial programs for the underemployed and the unemployed. Future Regional Role for Federal Way # Encourage greater diversity in the economic base by aggressive pursuit of a broader range of the components of the regional economic activity, às well as greater participation in international/Pacific Rim economic activity. # Increase its share of local resident-serving retail and services, and increase its share of regional, national, and international oriented business firms. # Increase its capture of region-serving office development. # Emphasize private redevelopment and land assembly through the 1-5/SR-99 corridor, especially in the City Center, as well as the 348th and 336th areas. # Strengthen the City Center as the City's focal point for commercial and community activities. Transform the City Center into a regional commercial destination, as well as a major transit hub. # Generate more demand for hotel room-nights through growth in business park and office space, as well as recreational and cultural amenities that draw visitors from throughout the Pacific Northwest and beyond. # Take advantage of its location with respect to the Ports of Tacoma and Seattle, as well as the SeaTac International Airport. # Public and private sectors in the Federal Way area act cooperatively and . aggressively to attract firms from throughout the region, the nation, and other countries. # Actively pursue relationships with areas in other parts of the Pacific Rim region for trade, commerce, and cultural advantage. # Actively pursue cooperation and collaboration with other nearby municipalities, organizations, and firms to market Federal Way and South King County for technology-related enterprises. Revised 2002 IV-14 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Retail Areas # SeaTac Mall and other regional retailers within the City redevelop/reposition to meet changing consumer demand and become more competitive with other regional retailers. # High-volume retail in Federal Way increases faster than population. # Growth in resident-serving retail occurs in the City Center, existing commercial nodes, new nodes around the I-5/South 320th and I-5/SR 18 interchanges, and in redevelopment areas along SR-99. # Neighborhood scale retail development keeps pace with population growth and to an increasing extent, is accommodated within mixed-use buildings in more concentrated neighborhood villages. # Pedestrian-oriented retail development emerges gradually in the redeveloped City Center. # Small amounts of retail use occur on the ground floor of offices, residential buildings, and parking structures. # Neighborhood scale retail development in concentrated neighborhood villages emerges in response to growth in multiple-family concentrations in the I-5/SR-99 corridor and new single-family development on the east side ofI-5. # Old, outdated strip centers along the SR-99 corridorredevelop as a mix of retail, office, and dense residential uses. # The large truck-stop facility at the intersection of Enchanted Parkway and South 348th Street is redeveloped into a retail or mixed-use commercial center. Office Development # Offices of regional, national, and/or international firms locate in West Campus, East Campus, and the City Center. # Garden, high-rise, and mid-rise office space, and modern light-industrial buildings increase rapidly in areas with land assembled for business parks and in redeveloped retail areas. # Office development is integrated with retail, residential, and business parks. # Federal Way attracts more corporate regional headquarters and regional offices. Revised 2002 IV-15 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development # Smaller, older, outdated office structures are replaced with newer uses. # Integrated, campus-like high amenity areas are encouraged for corporate headquarters and modern research/development of high technology uses east ofl-5. # Development of technical and research space increases in East and West Campus. # Federal Way attracts more high-tech finns and finns whose business is related to high-tech industries. Business Park (Light Industrial) Development # Business parks contain a mix of uses in and among buildings as dictated by the market for high quality space. # The City should explore potential changes to the Business Park zoning designation to meet changing market conditions and make the development of Business Park-zoned land more economically viable. Residential Areas # High quality residential areas are important for attracting and retaining businesses. # A range of housing types, densities, and prices allow the broad spectrum of employees to live near their work and recreation. # The City of Federal Way encourages integration of high density housing with retail and other uses, especially along SR-99 and in the City Center. Institutional, Educational, Cultural, and Recreational Development # The City of Federal Way will continue to work closely with existing institutional entities (such as 81. Francis Hospital, Federal Way School District, King County Library, etc.) as important components ofa full-service local economy. # Federal Way's reputation as an important center for amateur sports competition and participation grows stronger, leading to potentially new facilities and venues, as well as increased visitorship and visitor spending in the local economy. # Federal Way's cultural assets increase in both scope and number, gaining greater patronage and attracting visitors from beyond the City limits. New cultural establishments are developed in Federal Way, such as museums, exhibitions, and Revised 2002 IV-16 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development perfonnance venues. Likewise, new cultural events become established in Federal Way, such as music festivals, art shows/festivals, etc. # # Stimulate quality development of region-serving institutional and technical facilities. Existing recreational amusement facilities continue to develop as regional tourist attractions. # The City of Federal Way creates working partnerships with institutions of higher education in order to encourage and support their expansion and further integration within the Federal Way economy, as well as to identify and exploit increasing opportunities for economic development. 4.3 FORECAST OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN FEDERAL WAY The growth forecasts used in this chapter are derived from the 2000 Market Analysis and 2002 City Center Market Analysis, prepared by ECONorthwest, while other chapters are based on the PSRC regional forecasting model. In summary, probably the strongest sector in the near-term (five years) will be the retail/ services sector. About 1.5 million additional square feet ofretail tenant space may be expected during the next 20 years, with commercial areas throughout the City and the City Center alike sharing in the development. One particular sector that appears under- represented is the quality restaurant sector, in which the City will likely see additional development. Demand for new office development will likely be somewhat low in the near tenn, as office vacancies have risen substantially and rents have correspondingly fallen, region- wide. In addition, several office buildings, particularly in the West Campus area, exhibit substantial vacancies that can readily absorb near-tenn demand in the City. Nevertheless, the long-term picture looks good, with continued demand for and interest in office space in Federal Way, particularly in the East and West Campus areas. City Center office development will likely lag behind for most of the planning horizon. However, generous zoning, panoramic views, and proximity to the freeways and transit may start to make the City Center a more attractive location for mid- to high-rise office development in the 10 to 20-year time frame. With regard to housing, only a small amount ofland remains in the single-family zoning districts to accommodate new single-family dwellings. As a consequence, the vast majority of new residential development will have to take the form of townhouses, walk- up apartments, mid-rise apartments, and mixed-use buildings and/or high-rise residential buildings. As with the condition for single-family development, the majority of the multi- family-zoned land is also already developed, leaving primarily the commercial zones and City Center as the potential location of a great deal of the future residential development. Nevertheless, higher land values and construction costs, and lower relative rental rates compared with other communities in the region, act as barriers to residential development Revised 2002 IV-17 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development within the City Center in the near term, unless public-sector actions create financial incentives, reduce development costs, or otherwise create conditions attractive to housing developers. Therefore, in the short term, most multi-family housing developments will continue to be seen in the remaining multifamily-zoned areas and in the neighborhood commercial areas or other commercial areas along Pacific Highway South. While multi- family housing is generally not permitted in the Business Park zones, this zone will continue to accommodate senior housing developments, as has been seen in recent years. In the longer term, assuming no public-sector incentives, as rental rates rise and demand increases, housing developers will likely respond to the opportunities for development within the City Center, and begin to add multi-family housing there, as well. Substantial new lodging development in Federal Way is not anticipated in the near term, unless actions are taken to increase demand substantially. With business travel somewhat cut back due to increasingly burdensome airline-travel procedures since September 11, 200 I, the demand for hotel rooms has dropped. Business-related travel may be slow to return to earlier levels. Sports-related lodging demand during the late Spring, Summer, and early Fall has been solid over the past few years and is expected to increase, although development of new lodging facilities will likely not follow increased demand during only a few months of the year. If sports- or event-related facilities are developed within the City that could accommodate off-season events, it is likely that more near-term demand for lodging would rise and could occasion development of new facilities within the five-year timeframe. Like all forecasts, these should be periodically monitored relative to the real estate market and economic conditions in South King County, the Central Puget Sound region, and Federal Way. In addition, the economic development policies and underlying assumptions related to local and regional decisions concerning infrastructure, transportation systems, and land use regulation should be carefully monitored. 4.4 IMPLEMENT ATION Attributes of Successful Economic Development Programs Successful economic development programs typically have the following attributes. First, they receive material support and leadership from the mayor, City Council, and senior City staff. Second, the municipal leadership is willing to work creatively and cooperatively with private sector leaders and businesses to accomplish economic development goals. They have the ability and find the resources to target infrastructure projects and programs to encourage development or redevelopment of specific areas. To do this, they work aggressively to secure state and federal funds for local public and private assistance. Likewise, City staff is empathetic toward economic development goals and knowledgeable about working within City legal constraints, budget constraints, and community tolerances to assist businesses and the real estate development process. The staff also has the ability to react and make decisions quickly and consistently to provide Revised 2002 IV-18 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development assistance for private sector dealings with the public planning and regulatory processes. The staffs ability to link several programs, team up with other departments, and leverage limited funds allows them to take meaningful and effective action. In addition, the City should be creative and open to exploring and adopting innovative regulatory and incentive programs to attract and retain businesses and development projects, such as SEP A planned actions and developer agreements. Key among such programs should be any feasible efforts aimed at predictable and streamlined permitting processes. The City's Role in the Economic Life of a Community In the State of Washington, the direct actions that cities can take to encourage economic development have historically been more limited than in other states. Nevertheless, in the past few years several new and important tools have been made available to local communities to help encourage redevelopment, retain/attract jobs, and foster "smart growth." These tools include: # Community redevelopment financing (similar to tax increment financing) # Limited tax abatement for multifamily development # Community empowerment zone designation # Community renewal act (updated and expanded version of former urban renewal) # Tax deferrals and exemptions for high technology businesses and investment, as well as manufacturing investment # Industrial revenue bonds Notwithstanding these state programs, there are still substantial constraints on the scope of actions a city government can do with respect to economic development activities. However, one of the most significant direct actions a city can take is to provide the necessary infTastructure. This includes: 1) developing long term facilities expansion plans; 2) designing the specific systems and projects; 3) raising or borrowing local funds to finance the projects or act as a conduit for state, federal, and intergovernmental funds; and, 4) forming public-private partnerships to jointly construct projects. Second, a city can deliver high quality and cost effective urban services. These necessary services include police and fire protection; parks, recreation, and cultural services; social services and job training; and a well-run land use planning and regulatory process. In addition, a city can actively participate in public/private groups designed to help businesses and the development community as they work their way through the state and federal regulatory processes. Third, a city can directly impact economic development by doing market research or by being a landowner and developer. For example, a city could develop, maintain, and disseminate data and analysis on local development conditions and trends, as well as Revised 2002 IV-19 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development monitor important trends and assumptions upon which plans, programs, and strategies are based. In addition, a city can buy land, aggregate parcels, and make necessary improvement so that it is ready for new development or redevelopment. For some projects, a city can issue industrial revenue bonds or other tax-free municipal bonds. This also allows a city to joint venture with a private sector partners for appropriate development. In terms of indirect roles, a city can act as a facilitator to convene public and private entities to work on issues of local importance and reach consensus. Preparation of a comprehensive plan is an example of this important indirect action. A city can act as a representative oflocal resident's and business's interests in resolving regional and countywide problems such as traffic congestion, housing, and human service issues. A city can also mobilize local community support for important projects and problem solving; and work to improve the overall image of the community and in doing so, make the community more attractive for economic development. Lastly, a city's public investment in municipal facilities, such as city administrative offices, judicial/court facilities, community centers, and cultural and recreational venues can be a factor in inducing further economic development. By targeting a subarea for an infusion of redevelopment investment and daytime population, nearby businesses not only may see a greater captive market, but may also be encouraged to remodel, renovate, and/or improve their establishments. Cultural and recreational facilities can have a wide range of economic impact, from simply attracting residents to a particular part of the city (e.g., city center) more frequently where they may patronize other businesses, to attracting visitors from around the region and country who will bring new revenue to the local economy through lodging, restaurant, and goods/services expenditures. General Approaches to an Economic Development Strategy There are basically four local economic development strategies that impact the level of private business growth in a community. # First, studies of employment growth experience in local communities in the United States show that the large majority of new jobs are generated by expansion and retention of businesses that are already located in the community. A city's role in this strategy is to help businesses resolve problems so that they can expand locally rather than move to another community. Problem resolution includes helping a business find a larger more suitable site, work through a land use or zoning regulation problem, or access necessary infrastructure. This strategy typically has low to moderate cost implications and a high probability of success. # Second, the relocation of firms from other parts of the country or new plant locations are rare and do not account for a significant share oflocal employment growth relative to overall employment growth in the United States. However, when new firms do relocate to the community, the boost in the local economy can be great and the "press" can attract the attention of other firms. Local governments can attract new business to their community through aggressive marketing strategies (websites, brochures, etc.), close collaboration with regional Revised 2002 IV-20 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development economic development councils and chambers of commerce, and through financial incentives. This strategy has high risk for the number of successes and has a high cost. # Third, new businesses that are the result of new business start-ups, spin-offs from existing local firms, and new business ideas and technologies are another effective way that communities increase employment and businesses within a local area. Local government encourages new business formation usually through indirect methods. These strategies can have moderate-to-high costs depending on the specific actions and low-to-moderate degree of success. # Fourth, tourism and visitorship can be very important components of a local economy. A city with recreational or cultural assets that draw visitors can build upon these assets to increase the numbers of visitors, the length of their stays, and the amount of money they spend in the local economy. Local government can work to market the community and its assets beyond the immediate region to bring in new economic activity and can invest in recreational or cultural infrastructure to attract more events and/or visitors. Human Resource Programs In addition to the economic development strategies discussed in the previous section, human resource development programs are another general way whereby cities can support economic development. These programs are often not included as parts of an economic development program because they focus on assisting people-the human resource for businesses. However, improving and remediating human resources is an important long run approach. The previous four general approaches to economic development strategies try to raise revenues, reduce costs, or reduce risks for business location, facility investment decisions, and operating decisions of businesses. Human resource programs make a community attractive to new and existing businesses by improving the local labor force. Components of a human resources program may include: I) providing temporary support for underemployed workers, unemployed workers, and their families; 2) providing job training and retraining to improve an individual's ability to enter or remain in the work force; 3) creating referral and other programs that allow labor resources to become more mobile and to respond to information about job openings; and, 4) by providing social service programs that meet the needs of community residents who are temporarily not able to participate in the economy. In many instances a City's human resources program addresses some, ifnot all, of these human resource development objectives. Economic Development Strategy For Federal Way As with many cities, Federal Way will have limited funds with which to pursue its economic development goals. The City will have to use its resources in a focused and prioritized manner to have a positive impact on the local economic base. Table IV-5 Revised 2002 IV-21 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development (page 22) summarizes how Federal Way will implement an appropriate economic development strategy. Table IV-5 Economic Development Areas and Actions Sub Area of Who Initiates What Land Uses Are How Are They Federal Way Action Encoura~ed Encoura~ed Reasons Timin~ PRIMARY ECONOMIC AREAS City Center Public w/ Midlhigh-rise office. Sound Transit Station. To increase capture of Emphasis 5-10 private support. High-density MF In-fill infrastructure. regional growth. (20) years. residential. Public amenities. To provide community Civic/cultural, Market amenities and assets focal point/core. recreational~ Potential tax incentives. To obtain more full-range Pedestrian-oriented SEPA Planned Action~ of goods/ services in City~ retail. 344th to Public w/ Mix oflow-rise office Regulations that encourage Large parcels allow this Emphasis 0-5 356th/SR99 private support. & light industry. high-quality design. subarea to respond to the (10) years. "Big box" retail. Aggressive infrastructure market for business & Investment. industrial park uses in Large land assembly. Southwest King County. West Campus Current Buildout & maintain Facilitate buildout through One of the City's prime Ongoing in landowners. quality. predictable, efficient commercial amenities as response to permitting process. one of the highest quality market. Assist maintenance of master planned infrastructure and public developments in the areas. Pacific Northwest. East Campus Weyerhaeuser High-quality corporate Predictable, efficient One of City's prime In response to Corp. & office parks. permitting process. commercial amenities. market & Assist maintenance of Large landownership with corporate infrastructure and public vision, resources, & track actIOns. areas. record can attract major investors. 336th linkage: Public wI High density MF. Land use & capital Provide housing & su- As appropriate four primary private support. Low rise office. improvements for gradual pport services for for market. economic dvpt Supportive retail. redevelopment/in-fill. economIc areas. areas. Public amenities. Transportation infrastructure. Old Hwy 99 Public w/ High capacity & Land use & capital Provide a range of ho- As appropriate outside of main private support. business related. improvements for gradual using & support services for market. economic areas. High density MF redevelopment & in-fill. & retail for economic & residential. Aesthetic improvements residential areas. Low rise office. through sign code and urban Auto-oriented retail. design guidelines. Neighborhood commercial. High density MF Predictable. efficient Areas around 1- residential. permitting process. Provide a range of ho- 5/South 320th Current Low rise office. Aesthetic imorovements using & support services As appropriate and 1-5/SR 18 landowners. Auto-oriented retail. through sign code and urban & retail for economic & for market. interchanges. Neighborhood design guidelines. residential areas. commercial. Revised 2002 IV-22 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Economic Development Goals The City of Federal Way will not wait for market forces to create the future, but will act to shape and accelerate the evolving market trends in the direction of its vision. The City will pursue the following goals to implement economic development. Goals EDGI EDG2 EDG3 EDG4 EDG5 The City will emphasize redevelopment that transforms the City from a suburban bedroom community to a full-service community with an urban core. The City will encourage concentration of non-residential development into four pnmary areas: P High-density mixed-use development in the City Center (312th and 320th, SR-99 to 1-5) P Mixed-use development in the area around 348th and SR-99 and around the 1-5/South 320th and 1-5/SR 18 interchanges P High-quality office park development, including corporate headquarters, continued in and around West Campus P High-quality office development, including corporate headquarters in a park-like campus setting east ofI-5 The City will help facilitate redevelopment of existing neighborhood commercial centers in the SR-99 corridor and the 336th area between West and East Campus. The City will channel further residential growth into existing multi-family and commercial-zoned areas, with a particular goal of encouraging residential development in the City Center. The City will encourage and support the development of recreational and cultural facilities and/or events that will bring additional visitors to Federal Way, and/or increase visitor spending. EDG6 The City will encourage and support existing businesses to remain and/or expand their facilities within Federal Way. Economic Development Policies EDPI EDP2 Redevelopment of the City Center will receive special attention in the FWCP. The City will explore the feasibility and utility of a process to master plan the City Center, jointly funded by public and private entities, to encourage appropriate redevelopment. Revised 2002 IV-23 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development EDP3 EDP4 EDP5 EDP6 EDP7 EDP8 EDP9 The City will continue to seek high-quality urban design and infrastructure standards for these areas. The City will prepare a SEP A Planned Action for the City Center so that compliant development proposals may receive pennit approvals with a minimum of environmental review. The City will complete designs for public infrastructure to be jointly funded by the City and private landowners. The City will work actively to fonnulate ways for joint public/private funding of infrastructure. The City will develop zoning, pennitting, and potential financial incentives that encourage prioritized development consistent with comprehensive and subarea plans and orderly, phased growth. In order to encourage efficient and desired development and redevelopment of existing land designated and zoned for various types of commercial uses, when considering proposals for comprehensive plan amendments and rezones to commercial designations and from one commercial designation to another, the City will consider development trends in commercially zoned areas, market demand for various types of commercial land, and amount of vacant cornrnercialland. The City will utilize innovative planning techniques such as Planned Unit Developments, and developer agreements to aid in efficient and predicable pennitting for large developments. EDPIO The City will explore innovative financing techniques such as Local Improvement Districts, Industrial Revenue Bonds, and other innovative financing tools to encourage desired redevelopment. EDPll The City will work with the private sector to actively encourage the retention and expansion of existing businesses, as well as bring in new development, businesses, and jobs to the community. EDP12 The City will promote the community by working with the Federal Way Chamber and the private sector to develop marketing tools that attract new businesses, visitors, and investments. EDP13 The City will develop and manage an economic development web page that promotes business and development within the community, provides an interactive database ofinfonnation of value to businesses and developers, and involves the participation of the Federal Way Chamber and other stakeholder groups. Revised 2002 IV-24 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development EDP14 The City will fund its portion of the public/private groups to allow them to do an effective job in marketing the community. EDPIS The City will continue to utilize design guidelines to enhance the urban environment to retain and attract businesses and residents. EDP16 The City will adopt streamlined permitting processes consistent with state and federal regulations to reduce the up front costs oflocating businesses in the City. EDP17 The City will continue to pursue aggressive public safety programs designed to protect residents, businesses, and their investments. EDPIS The City will encourage strong public and private leadership to solicit community support for internal and external funding assistance. EDP19 The City will periodically monitor local and regional trends to be able to adjust plans, policies, and programs. EDP20 The City will actively work with representative groups of business and property owners, including the Federal Way Chamber and other local business associations, to enhance citywide and subarea improvements and planning. EDP21 The City, in conjunction with the local business community, will actively pursue ties to Pacific Rim nations and businesses to stimulate related business activity. EDP22 The City recognizes the importance of cultural and recreational activity to its economy and through the Arts Commission and Parks Department will pursue joint ventures with private groups and individuals in developing cultural and recreational opportunities. EDP23 The City will encourage the expansion of existing and development of new multi-purpose facilities to host cultural and recreational activities in order to increase the number of visitors to Federal Way and resultant visitor spending. EDP24 The City will continue to market the community for, and encourage development of, businesses in the high-tech sector. This effort will include exploration of regulatory and/or financial incentives to attract high-tech businesses and collaboration with regional communities, businesses, and local institutions of higher education to promote Federal Way and South King County. EDP25 The City of Federal Way will strive to create working partnerships with institutions of higher education in order to encourage and support their expansion and further integration within the Federal Way economy, as well as to identify and exploit increasing opportunities for economic development. EDP26 The City will consider opportunities to partner with local human-service organizations to assist in providing human resources development programs for unemployed or under-employed workers. Revised 2002 IV-25 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development The foregoing policies will assist the City of Federal Way to pursue an accelerated transformation toward the community's vision of its future. Table IV-6 (page 27) describes the four major employment, economic activity areas of the City that will receive the bulk of future commercial and industrial development. The table summarizes the characteristics, location, and planning process required as well as the major transformation required. The major public and private actions required for each area are listed. The Land Use and City Center chapters of the FWCP describe these four areas in more detail. Table IV-6 describes the current ownership pattern and major activities where the City will act affirmatively to transform these areas so that an increased share of regional growth will be attracted to the City. In the areas of multiple ownership, control and implementation of the community's vision will require more explicit effort and resources . from the City government. Both West and East Campus have, or will develop, their own high standards for quality of the new development. The type of development expected to occur in each of the four major economic sectors important to Federal Way's vision is related in Table IV-7 (page 28). Also related in the table are who the main competitors will be for each of these four areas. The land use policies and regulations for each area should accommodate and encourage these activities. These policies and regulations are discussed in the Land Use, City Center, and Transportation chapters of the FWCP. U Revised 2002 IV-26 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Vertical Mixed City Center Master-Planned Mixed Master Planned Corporate Horizontal Mixed-Use Campus Camous Business Parks Area 312th/320th West Campus East of 1-5 344th/356th Ownership Diverse Diverse Single Diverse Planninl!: Joint PubliclPrivate Private emphasis Private Emphasis Joint Public/Private Major Transformation Activity Increase office and residential Infill and continue trend Vacant to high quality corporate Scattered industrial retai I sectors in mixed-use buildings since 1974. headquarters & high tech. to quality mixed used. Major Public Actions Comprehensive Plans C C C C Subarea Plans C Private Private C Design Standards C C C C Environmental Impact Analysis C C C C Infrastructure Planning C C C C Infrastructure Design C Private Private C Financing Joint Private Private Joint Examples Seattle CBD West Campus Redmond Willows Road High Tech Corridor Burnaby BC High Tech Corridor Harbor Pointe Renton Bellevue Tukwila Vancouver, WA Kent Walnut Creek, CA Auburn Scottsdale, AZ Lynwood D I Table IV-6 t Zones: D Of C=City initiates and leads action Revised 2002 IV-27 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Market Segment Characteristics Current Competitive Vertical Mixed Master-Planned Master-Planned Horizontal Mixed- Examples City Center Mixed Campus Corporate Park Use Business Parks RETAIL High Cube Freeway access Moderate amenities 348th & SR18 High Volume Cheap land/space X Locates retail or light industrial areas Festival High density population & employment Pike Place Market Regional draw Bellevue Square X Retail & restaurants Westlake Center Mall stores Edmonds LaConner Employment & Resident High auto or pedestrian traffic Southcenter X X X X Supporting Tacoma Mall Auburn Man Rapidly growing population Southcenter X Man-like Freeway access Tacoma Mall Hotel Serves employmen't centers SeaTac Tacoma X Only at freeway Provides meeting space Tukwila intersection OFFICE Garden $Heavy landscape $Low pedestrian levels Older Bellevue $ Low/moderate in/out traffic Redmond $Small business/professional & business Renton & Tukwila X X services, FIRES $Serves local & regional business along arterials $Auto oriented $Residential areas close Mid-rise $ Larger tenants, sub-regional & regional Bellevue Tukwila $Moderate landscape $Moderate in & out Renton Lynnwood $SmalJlmedium business services, medial/dental Queen Anne Factoria X X X Occasionally if part of FIRES Lake Union Tacoma Master Plan $Branch offices $Some transit Elliott Way $Surface parking or on deck Freeway interchanges High Rise/Higher $ Pedestrian traffic $High amenities Seattle $Public transit $ Larger businesses Bellevue $Moderate traffic $Professional services Tacoma $ Headquarters, branch offices X X $Regional serving F.!.R.E.S. $Underground or deck parking BUSINESS PARKS $Auto/truck oriented $Warehouse/retail High Tech Corridor $Cheap land $Govemment offices Eastside $Employment density Renton $Manufacturing assembly Tukwila X X $Office local/regional Kent $ Professional & business service Lynn wood $ Distribution & service D Table IV-7 t Zones and L dU Revised 2002 IV-28 " ENUMc1Aw -"- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SOUTHWEST KING COUNTY AND NORTH PIERCE COUNTY SUB-REGION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT N State Boundary /\,: County Boundary N State Highways N Federal Way City Limits +. -SCAlE- 1 Inch _"is 21.000 Foøt ,~ Federal Way MAP IV-1 NOTE: Thla map 1& Inle~~ed f¡r ~se a& a glilphltal relH'esent¡tlo~ only. 1111 City 01 F!deTlI Way mahc no warramy IS 111 lis Ia:Uraty UtpprlntoG'oIIru"I2DOO -ba"_p""'br~.",,' MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# 1 JilT-C&-) .......-......................... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE, CONCOMITANT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN CATEGORY: BUDGET IMP ACT: 0 CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS IZI ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ..................-..................... """'."""'.."""""."'.""""".".' ............................. "."""'.'.""""""""""" A TT ACHMENTS: Adoption Ordinance, Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan, Findings and Conclusions, Amended Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Amended Zoning Map SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The City Council held a public hearing for the Christian Faith Center Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone, Development Agreement and Development Plan on May 24, 2004 at which time presentations were given and public comment taken. The City Council continued the hearing to June 15,2004, at which time the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance approving Christian Faith Center's application for first reading on July 6, 2004 and second reading and enactment on July 20, 2004. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A ............................................. ......................................... """"""""""""..'."""""".'..'." """"""",."""""",."..""",.""""" PROPOSED MOTION: I move the proposed ordinance to second reading and approval at the next regular meeting on July 20, 2004 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Concomitant and Development Agreement. ~~. ~~~~~~~ :~~~~~~~~~---- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # $'1/ REVISED - 05/10/2001 ORDINANCE NO. DRAFT {p/2-9/ () f' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASIDNGTON, RELATING TO LAND USE, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING FOR 49.97 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF S. 336TH STREET BETWEEN PACIFIC IDGHW A Y SOUTH AND INTERSTATE 5 FROM BUSINESS PARK (BP) TO MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 3600 (RM 3600), AND ADOPTING AN ASSOCIATED CONCOMIT ANT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Chapter 36.70A RCW or "GMA") requires the City of Federal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use element (including a land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities element, and transportation element (including transportation system map [ s]); and WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations implementing its comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with land use map (the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land use map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998, September 14,2000, and November 1,2001; and March 27, 2003; and WHEREAS, under RCW 36. 70A.130, by December, 2004, all jurisdictions within Washington State must take action to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive plan and development regulations to ensure that they comply with the GMA; and WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Article IX, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC); and ORD# , PAGE' 1 WHEREAS, under RCW 36. 70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to continuing review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year; and WHEREAS, the Council shall be considering three separate actions to amend the Plan, all of which will be acted upon simultaneously in order to comply with RCW 36.70A.130; and WHEREAS, these actions include adoption of a Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan, which will replace Chapter 8, Potential Annexation Areas of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and address certain comprehensive plan text changes pertaining to the Community Business (BC) comprehensive plan designation and zoning; and WHEREAS, these actions include deletion of the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map III-27B from the Comprehensive Plan and deletion of this project from Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List); and WHEREAS, these actions include a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM 3600) through adoption of an associated concomitant and development agreement and development plan for 49.97 acres located south ofS. 336th Street between Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5, referred to herein as the Christian Faith Center Property; and WHEREAS, in 2000, the City of Federal Way accepted requests for amendments to the text and maps of the comprehensive plan and applications for site-specific changes to the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map, and considered amendments to the text and maps of the comprehensive plan and to the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map, including a request to change the Christian Faith Center Property from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM 3600); and WHEREAS, on July 4, 2001, the City SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance on the proposed Plan and zoning map amendment; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1660, development agreements associated with a comprehensive plan designation and related zoning change may be used at the City Council's discretion, where , PAGE 2 ORO# the project is larger in scope and has potentially larger impacts than normal, or where the City Council may desire to place certain restrictions on the proposal; and WHEREAS, A Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement has been prepared for the proposed project on the Christian Faith Center Property (the "Project") in order to fully address and mitigate all identified impacts associated with the project, and the Concomitant Agreement allows for a rezone of the property but limits the allowable use of the property to a church, a school, and accessory uses, and the Agreement is accompanied by a Development Plan (Exhibit B to the Agreement) as required by FWCC Section 22-1669, and prepared in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1664; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A), the City issued Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) for the Project on November 18,2003, and March 3, 2004, and EIS Addenda on April 16, 2004 and May 21, 2004, and four public meetings were conducted during the environmental review process for the proposed Project which included an EIS Scoping Meeting on August 27, 2002, Neighborhood Traffic Meeting on May 8, 2003, Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) hearing on December 12, 2003, and City Council EIS briefing on March 15,2004; and WHEREAS, the proposed Plan and zoning map changes address all of the goals and requirements set forth in the GMA; and WHEREAS, the proposed Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan address all of the goals and requirements set forth in the FWCC; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council committees, and full City Council has received, discussed, and considered the testimony, written comments, and material from the public, as follows: 1. The City's Planning Commission considered the request for amendment to the comprehensive plan at public hearings held on July 18,2001, August 15,2001, and September 19, 2001, following which it forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and , PAGE 3 ORO# 2. The Land Use and Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the proposed site-specific changes to the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map on October 1,2001 at which time it requested a development agreement and development plan be prepared for the Project; and 3. The full City Council considered the proposed change to the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map and the associated Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan on May 24,2004, and June 15,2004; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the changes to the Plan's land use map and City's zoning map and associated Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan; Now, THEREFORE, the City Council ofthe City of Federal Way, Washington, does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. A. The proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan land use map, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, reflects new or updated infonnation developed since the initial adoption of the comprehensive plan. It bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; is in the best interest of the residents of the City; and is consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan. The amendment, as mitigated, is compatible with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods and will not negatively affect open space, streams, lakes or wetlands, or the physical environment in general. It will allow for growth and development consistent with the Plan's overall vision and with the Plan's land use element household and job projections, and/or will allow reasonable use of property subject to constraints necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas. It therefore bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; is in the best interest of the residents of the City; and is consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan. ORO# , PAGE 4 B. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map, set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto, adopted pursuant to the concomitant agreement, is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan and the comprehensive plan land use map proposed to be amended in Section 2 below, bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, and welfare, and is in the best interest of the residents of the City. c. The Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan, as set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto, is consistent with RCW 36.70B, RCW 43.2IC, and FWCC Chapter 22, Article XXI. D. Additional Findings and Conclusions are attached as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Adoption. The 1995 City of Federal Way comprehensive plan, as thereafter amended in 1998,2000,2001, and 2003, including its land use element map, copies of which are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby are and shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 3. Zoning Map Amendments Adoption. The 1996 City of Federal Way Official Zoning Map, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, 2001, and 2003 is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit B, pursuant to the Concomitant and Development Agreement, and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 4. Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan Adoption. The Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan, attached as Exhibit C, is hereby adopted and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 5. Amendment Authority. The adoption of Plan amendments is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541. The adoption of the Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapter 36.70B RCW and pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article XXI. ORD# , PAGE 5 Section 6. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 7. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and 1996 Zoning Map, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, 200 I, and 2003 shall remain in full force and effect until the amendments thereto become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance. Section 8. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affinned. Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days trom and after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ,2004. day of CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Mayor, Dean McColgan A TrEST: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE No: K: \CF C\Documen ts \Ad 0 pti on Ord i nance ORD# , PAGE 6 ORD# , PAGE 7 ExmBIT A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP EXHIBIT B ZONING MAP ORD# , PAGE 8 ExmBIT C CONCOMITANT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN ORD# , PAGE 9 CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND THE CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CHURCH AND PRIVATE SCHOOL JULY 20,2004 The City of Federal Way ("City") and the Christian Faith Center ("CFC"), a Washington nonprofit corporation, collectively referred to herein as "the Parties", enter into the following concomitant agreement and development agreement ("Agreement") regarding the rezoning of certain property and the scope of permissible development, use, and mitigation of environmental impacts associated with the campus development of a church and private school ("Project"), through construction of the buildings and related improvements on the CFC property. The agreement is both a concomitant agreement and a development agreement. The concomitant agreement allows for a rezone of certain property subject to development standards and conditions governing the use of the property. The development agreement provides the developer with certainty regarding the local regulations and mitigation requirements that will govern development for a specified project. The concomitant agreement is a condition to and limitation upon the rezone of the property, if adopted by the City Council. That is, if the site is rezoned subject to concomitant agreement, its use and development is restricted both by the regulations applicable to the new zoning classification and the provisions of the concomitant agreement, and where development standards in the agreement are more restrictive, they govern property development. The development of the property is conditioned and limited by both the development agreement and concomitant agreement, and they have been combined into one document. 1. Location. CFC is the owner of certain real property situated in Federal Way, Washington, located south of South 336th Street between SR-99 and Interstate 5 (the "Property"). The Property is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Project Description. The Project consists of development of a 218,500 square foot building for church sanctuary/school auditorium/administrative services a 101,526 square foot private school building, and associated parking and recreational and athletic fields as depicted on the Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Plan" or "Development Plan"). 3. Concomitant Agreement. If the Property is rezoned from Business Park (BP) to RM 3600 by the Federal Way City Council, CFC and the City agree that the Property may be developed only in accordance with the standards and mitigation set forth in the Agreement. The Property shall be developed as described in the Agreement, and as depicted in the Development Plan. The allowable use of the property shall be limited to that described in the Agreement. All development standards, including mitigation, identified in the Agreement shall apply to Property development. No development on the Property shall be inconsistent with the Agreement or City Code. The Property is subject to the Agreement, and shall be developed only in accordance with the development standards identified within the Agreement, including the Development Plan (except for minor modifications permitted by Section 10 of the Agreement), unless and until the Agreement is amended or rescinded, as authorized by the City. 4. Development Agreement. The Agreement is authorized by RCW 36.70B.170 through .210 and FWCC 22-1660 through 22-1680. It addresses Project development standards, which are defined in the statute to include, for example, impact fees, mitigation, design standards, phasing issues, review procedures, vesting issues, and any other appropriate development requirements.) The Agreement provides the City and CFC with certainty as to the type of Project that will be built, the type of mitigation that will be provided, and the development regulations to which the Project will vest. The Project is consistent with current local regulatory requirements? As authorized by state statute/ the Agreement identifies mitigation under City codes and the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 43.21C RCW, "SEPA") required for the project. 5. Vesting. City development regulations, as found in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) or otherwise legislatively adopted4, and the mitigation measures adopted herein shall govern the Project for a period of five years, dating from execution of the Agreement. Any amendments or additions made to City development regulations during the five year period shall not apply to or affect the development, except as otherwise provided, or if other county, state or federal laws preempt the City's authority to vest regulations. The City reserves the authority to impose new or different officially adopted regulations to the extent required by a serious threat to the public health and safety.s After the five-year period, amendments or additions made by the City to these development regulations and the mitigation measures adopted herein shall apply to any subsequent or further development of the Property. Otherwise, the Property and the uses thereof that are developed consistent with this Agreement shall be deemed legal, nonconforming uses. Provisions of the Agreement, including specifically identified development standards and mitigation measures, do not terminate after the five-year period and continue to restrict development of the Property unless and until amended by the City. 6. Project Mitigation Under SEPA. The Project has been subject to detailed environmental review. A Final Environmental Impact Statement ("FEIS") was issued on March 3, 2004 and addenda were issued April 16, 2004 and May 21, 2004. Mitigation of significant adverse environmental impacts imposed under SEPA, through the City's SEPA regulations, is incorporated into the Agreement. 7. Development of CFC Property. 7.1 Permitted Uses. CFC covenants and agrees that it will limit any use of the Property to the church and school uses, as depicted in the Development Plan, attached as Exhibit B. Both the church and school are classified as principal uses for application of FWCC Sections 22-671 and 22-674. Accessory uses shall be limited to those approved as a part of this Agreement and shown on the attached Plan or List of Permitted Accessory Uses, attached as Exhibit C, or any accessory use determined by the Director of Community Development Services to be allowed, or analogous to an allowed accessory use, in the RM 3600 zone. 7.2 Relationship Between City Development Regulations and Development Standards Identified in Agreement. Development Regulations include all provisions of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), including without limitation FWCC Chapters 18 through 22. The Development Regulations for the Property include those applicable to the RM 3600 zone and as 'RCW36.70B.170(3). 2 RCW36.70B.170(1). 3 RCW 36.70B.170(3)(c). 4 Legal requirements include legislatively adopted standards governing development. such as zoning, building and development regulations, impact fees, SEP A regulations and substantive SEP A policies, and other laws, ordinances or policies. 5 See RCW 36.70B.170(4). 2 set forth in the Agreement. The Agreement establishes site specific development standards, including mitigation. Property development shall be consistent with both development regulations and the development standards identified in the Agreement. Where the development standards in the Agreement are more restrictive, they shall govern development of the Property, as specified herein. 7.3 Construction Phasing. Project construction shall be limited to two phases. Phase One shall comprise construction of the building for the church sanctuary, auditorium, meeting rooms and administrative offices, and the first 81,323 square feet of the school building, together with all on-site and off-site improvements required by this Agreement and by the conditions of any related permit approval. Phase Two shall comprise construction of a future second-story 20,203 square foot addition to the school building. Each phase, with the exception of improvements completely within the interior of a building, must be substantially completed within twenty-four (24) months of issuance of the building permit for that phase, except for delays beyond the control of CFC and approved by the Director of Community Development Services which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Project construction shall be completed within five years of the execution of this Agreement, except for delays beyond the control of CFC and approved by the Director of Community Development Services which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 8. Settlement Agreement. The Parties shall be bound by the Settlement Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Federal Way Industrial Park, Inc., dated February 5, 1996, attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference. The Settlement Agreement provides certain development standards and other provisions applicable to use and development of the Property, which are consistent with the terms of this Agreement. The terms of this Agreement shall control over any inconsistent terms in the Settlement Agreement. 9. Development Standards, Including Mitigation. The Project shall be consistent with all specified development standards. CFC shall construct, install or implement, as part of Project Construction, all mitigation required by the Agreement. The City Council has reviewed the EIS and the record. Mitigation has been developed based on these documents. 9.1 Project Design and Site Configuration. 9.1.1 Building Setback. All site improvements shall be setback from South 336th Street a minimum of 50 feet. The property bordering South 336th Street shall be deemed the front yard for purposes of this Agreement. Remaining rear and side setbacks for the church building shall be 30 feet from any property line or right-of-way. Remaining side and rear setbacks for the school building, ball fields, and any playground equipment shall be 50 feet from any property line or right-of-way. 9.1.2 Building Height. The maximum allowed height of single-story elements of the church building is 35 feet above average building elevation (ABE), with up to three additional feet allowed for articulated cornices; the maximum allowed height for second- story elements containing offices, classrooms, library and similar uses is 40 feet above ABE. The maximum height of the school building is 40 feet above ABE with up to three additional feet allowed for articulated cornices. The maximum allowed height for the church sanctuary/school auditorium portion of the building and the gymnasium is 55 feet above ABE. 3 9.1.3 Landscaping. CFC shall provide an approved landscape plan, prior to issuance of the Phase One building pennit, incorporating the following features. The landscape plan shall be prepared by a landscape architect in consultation with a habitat biologist, whose recommendations shall be incorporated into the plan. 9.1.3.1 Perimeter Landscaping. CFC shall provide a combination of existing and new native landscaping to accomplish Type III landscaping along all property lines and public rights-of-way and access easements. Along South 336th Street, landscaping shall be 50 feet in width consisting of 25 feet of a combination of Existing Native and Type III landscaping and 25 feet of Type IV landscaping. Along all other property lines associated with that portion of the Property containing the church, landscaping shall be 15 feet in width consisting of 10 feet of a combination of Existing Native and Type III landscaping and 5 feet of Type IV landscaping. Wetlands and wetland buffers which are vegetated in accordance with a City approved wetland mitigation plan and landscape plan and which are in excess of fifty (50) feet between the development and the property line shall be deemed to have satisfied the landscaping requirements of that property line. 9.1.3.2 Detention Pond Landscaping. Landscaping around detention ponds shall comply with the approved landscape plan and include at a minimum provision for dense bank cover and trees larger than the minimum required by FWCC to provide shade and reduce water temperature. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "larger" means deciduous trees larger than 3 inch caliper and evergreen trees taller than eight feet. 9.1.3.3 Habitat Retention. CFC shall provide a fifty (50) foot wide wildlife corridor from the west wetland to the east wetland with small animal culvert crossings under proposed roads and water ponding areas along the wildlife corridor, at a spacing of approximately 200 feet, to provide drinking areas for small animals. 9.1.4 Parking. 9.1.4.1 Setback. Parking shall be permitted within the required side and rear yards, but not within 10 feet of any property line associated with the school or within 15 feet of any property line associated with the church or within any required buffer. 9.1.4.2 Number of Stalls. CFC shall provide a minimum of 1,406 parking stalls and a maximum of 1,540 parking stalls. 9.1.4.3 Parking Dimensions. Maximum parking lot and stall dimensional requirements shall be equivalent to corresponding minimum FWCC requirements except as modified by the attached Exhibit E. 9.1.4.4 Overflow Parking/Special Events. Overflow parking shall be permitted only pursuant to a parking plan approved by the Director of Public Works. CFC 4 shall develop and submit a plan for approval by the Director of Public Works prior to special events to manage overflow parking through an arrangement with an appropriate transit provider or local hosts for shared use of additional off-site parking spaces and shuttle transportation connecting the overflow parking areas and the site during special events or in the event of recurring overflow parking conditions. CFC shall be responsible for all costs associated with traffic control including, but not limited to, flaggers, police officers, signs, and shuttle transportation. 9.1.5 Size Limitation. 9.1.5.1 School. The school structure shall be limited to 101,526 square feet, including 81,323 square feet in Phase One and 20,203 square feet in Phase Two, as depicted in the attached Conceptual Floor Plan, Exhibit F. The day care shall be located in the main church/sanctuary/administration building and shall be limited to 33,000 square feet. Based on these maximum square footages, total enrollment of the school and daycare shall be limited to a maximum of 900 full- time students. 9.1.5.2 Sanctuary. Sanctuary occupancy shall confonn to all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations and shall not exceed 4,500 occupants. 9.1.5.3 College. The Dominion College shall be considered an accessory use to the church and as such shall primarily serve CFC students and staff and members of the CFC congregation. The Dominion College shall be limited to 23,000 square feet as depicted in the attached Conceptual Floor Plan, Exhibit F. Based on this square footage, enrollment shall be limited to a maximum of 225 students. 9.1.5.4 Recreation Areas. Exterior recreation and play areas shall be provided in a minimum amount of 27,026 square feet in the school yard, a minimum 100,000 square feet in the recreation/sports field, and 4,613 square feet in the church day care area. Such minimum areas shall be pennanently maintained as recreation and play areas. 9.2 Operational Limitations. CFC operations shall be consistent with the schedule and restrictions listed below. Changes in the below schedule, which was provided by the applicant, shall be reviewed under FWCC 22-1680 to ensure that the project remains consistent with the review completed under SEP A and the FWCc. Minor modifications may be approved by the Director of Community Development Services, as specified in FWCC 22-1680. 9.2.1 Church Service Hours. Church services shall be limited to one weekday evening service (typically on Wednesdays) which shall not begin before 6:30 p.m. and Sunday church services shall be separated by at least one and one/halfhours between services. 9.2.2 Dominion College Hours. Dominion College classes shall not be held on weekends or between the hours of noon and 6:30 p.m. weekdays. 9.2.3 Bible Study Hours. Bible Study classes shall be held only weekdays before noon. 5 9.2.4 School Hours. School classes shall be completed no later than 3:30 p.m. daily. 9.2.5 Holiday Services/Special Events. Holiday services and special events shall be scheduled consistent with the approved Traffic Management Plan (TMP) required by 9.4.12 and consistent with 9.1.4.4. 9.3 Construction Mitigation. 9.3.1 Erosion Sediment Control. CFC shall designate and provide an onsite Erosion Sediment Control (ESe) Supervisor approved by the Director of Public Works, who possesses a Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Certification by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). This ESC Supervisor shall be available for the duration of the project. The qualifications and responsibilities of the ESC Supervisor are outlined in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City of Federal Way Addendum. The Director of Public Works may further limit clearing and grading activities on the site based on recommendations from the ESC Supervisor and requirements of the KCSWDM. 9.3.2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. A construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided by CFC and reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of any construction permits or authorizations. Construction phasing shall be included in this plan. CFC has proposed several BMP's which shall be captured in the SWPP plan including, but not limited to, confining refueling and equipment maintenance to a hard-surface staging area with spill containment features and a spill clean-up kit, and pipe slope drains used to convey storm water over steep slopes. 9.3.3 Clearing and Grading. Clearing and grading shall be allowed only pursuant to a phased construction plan approved by the Director of Public Works. Clearing and grading shall occur only between May 1 and September 30 unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. 9.4 Traffic Mitigation. CFC shall perform, as part of Project construction and prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy unless otherwise noted, the following traffic mitigation as required and approved by the Director of Public Works. 9.4.1 CFC shall reconstruct 18th Avenue South from berm to S 344th Street to a Type R street, consisting of 40 foot wide street with curbs, gutters, 4 foot planter strips with street trees, 6-foot sidewalks, street lights, and traffic calming elements, in a 60 foot right-of- way, consistent with the attached Exhibit G-l. 9.4.2 CFC shall improve S 344th Street fÌ"om 16th Avenue S to 18th Avenue S consistent with the attached Exhibit G-2. Construction shall consist of Type R Street. The north side shall consist of a 40 foot wide street with curb and gutters, 4 foot planter strip with street trees, 6 foot sidewalk, and street lights. The improvements shall be tied into the existing improvements to the west end of S 344th Street to the east side of the intersection of S 344th Street and 16th Avenue S. On the south side, only curb and gutter shall be required. CFC shall construct improvements within existing right-of-way. 6 9.4.3 CFC shall improve S 344th Street through the intersection of 16th Avenue Sand shall signalize the intersection of S 344th/16th Ave S consistent with the attached Exhibit G-3. CFC shall construct improvements within existing right-of-way. 9.4.4 CFC shall construct street improvements consistent with the attached Exhibit 0-4 to signalize the intersection ofSR 99 and S 344th Street and provide a westbound-to- southbound left-turn lane within existing right-of-way. If delays beyond the control of CFC and the City prevent the completion of these improvements by the time of issuance of certificate of occupancy, CFC may obtain a certificate of occupancy subject to the Public Works Director requiring temporary traffic control measures for up to one hour following the end of each Sunday service until such time that the traffic signal is operational. 9.4.5 CFC shall perform a sight distance study, propose a conceptual intersection plan for the intersection of 20th Avenue S at S 341 5t Street to be approved by the Director of Public Works, and construct improvements as determined by the Director of Public Works. 9.4.6 CFC shall construct street improvements along S 336th Street consistent with the attached Exhibits G-5 and G-6. The improvements shall be consistent with Type M street between SR 99 and 20th Avenue S, consisting of an l8-foot half-street with curbs and gutter, 6-foot planter strip with street trees, 8-foot sidewalk, street lights, underground utilities, and 3-foot utility strip. Improvements will be consistent with Type K street between 20th Avenue Sand 1-5, consisting of a 22-foot half-street with curb and gutter, 6- foot planter strip with street trees, 8 foot sidewalk, street lights, underground utilities, and 3-foot utility strip. A continuous two-way left-turn lane shall be provided between SR 99 and Forest Lane Town Homes frontage. Curbs and gutter, planter strip, and sidewalk shall also be provided on the north side between South Garden Court condominiums and Forest Lane Town Homes to tie into the existing improvements. An eastbound right-turn lane shall be provided on S 336th Street at 20th Avenue S, consisting of a 100-foot storage length and 50-foot taper length. These improvements may be modified by the Director of Public Works to minimize impacts to wetlands or minimize right-of-way acquisition. 9.4.7 CFC shall improve 20th Avenue S for a distance of 225 feet (175 feet of storage and 50 foot taper) to the North of the intersection of S 336th Street and signalize the intersection consistent with the attached Exhibit 0-7. 9.4.8 CFC shall construct an eastbound right turn lane from S. 336th Street to 20th Avenue S. 9.4.9 CFC shall construct traffic calming elements on 20th Avenue S from S 336th Street to S 330th Street, including traffic circles at S 330th Street and S 332nd Street and an island diverter at S 336th Street to prevent northbound and southbound through movements, and construct a sidewalk on the east side of 20th Avenue S from S 336th Street to tie in to the existing sidewalk, consistent with the attached Exhibits G- 7 and G- ~. CFC shall construct improvements within existing right-of-way. 9.4.10 CFC shall provide two transit shelters, shelter footings, litter receptacle pads, 7 landing pads and benches, one located on 20th Avenue S in the existing location north of S 336th Street and one located on S 336th Street as determined by City staff with input from King County Metro and Pierce Transit. 9.4.11 Upon a one time request of the Director of Public Works, CFC shall develop and implement Sunday peak hour timing plans, based on turning movement counts for signal timing plans collected by CFC for the intersections of 20th Avenue Sand S 336th Street, SR 99 and S 324th Street, SR 99 and S 330th Street, SR 99 and S 336th Street, SR 99 and S 340th Street, 16th Avenue Sand S 344th Street, and SR 161 and S 348th Street. 9.4.12 CFC shall implement a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) for the Project as approved by the Director of Public Works. 9.4.13 CFC shall pay to the City Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and No/lOO Dollars ($350,000.00) to expand the City's existing project at the intersection of S 34Sth Street and SR 161 to provide for the construction of a second northbound right-turn lane with 550 feet of storage. Payment shall be made one year after receipt of the Certificate of Occupancy for Phase One of the Project or upon award of the bid to construct the turn lane whichever shall occur first. 9.4.14 CFC shall pay to King County its pro rata share contribution to the King County Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) project at South 320th Street and Military Road in the amount of Six Hundred Forty-Seven and No/100 Dollars ($647.00). Except as provided above, CFC shall use its best efforts to acquire any and all right-of-way necessary to complete the improvements described in this Agreement. If, through no fault of CFC, CFC is unable to acquire right-of-way necessary to complete the improvements described, the City and CFC agree to meet and confer on possible alternatives. The Director of Public Works may modify the required improvements as necessary provided impacts are mitigated. 9.5 Pavment of Pro Rata Share. CFC shall pay, prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy for Phase One of its construction as defined in this Agreement, its pro rata share contribution to impacted City Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects, identified and calculated below: 0 S 348th Street: 9th Ave S - SR 99: $60,500 0 S 356th St: 1 5t Ave S - SR 99: $50,200 0 S 348th St @ 1st Ave S: $13,100 0 S 336th St @ 1 st Way S: $3000 0 1zth Ave SW / SW 344th St Extension: SW Campus Dr - 21 st Ave SW: $38,700 0 1 5t Ave S: S 320th St - S 330th St: $7600 0 21st Ave SW Extension: SW 356th St - 22nd Ave SW: $2800 0 SR 18 @ SR 161: $24,800 0 S 336th St @ 9th Ave S: $1100 0 S 320th St @ 1-5: $34,100 Total $235,900 9.6 Surface Water Mitigation. The following storm water mitigation, as required and 8 approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be designed by CFC prior to issuance of construction permits or authorizations and constructed by CFC prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 9.6.1 CFC shall design and construct the east basin storm water detention ponq to meet Level 2 flow control standards. 9.6.2 Consistent with the Process IV Hearing Examiner Decision, CFC shall design and construct all runoff from the Sanctuary roof for the 2 year storm event to be collected and dispersed through percolation trenches to maintain wetland hydrology in the westerly wetland. 9.6.3 CFC shall design and construct all surface water treatment facilities from the East and West 1 subcatchments to include the use of Stonnwater Management@ filter vault systems which meet or exceed Resource Stream Protection standards. 9.6.4 CFC shall design and construct storm water discharge facilities entering into wetlands or buffers as percolation or infiltration trenches and discharges to wetland buffers in a dispersed manner consistent with the Process IV Hearing Examiner Decision and as approved by the Director of Public Works. 9.6.5 CFC shall provide, prior to issuance of Building Permit, an Integrated Pest Management Plan as described in the Ecology Stormwater Manual (Ecology 2001). This source control BMP shall outline control of fertilizer and pesticide application, soil erosion, and site debris, and include the use of pesticides/herbicides only as a last resort. 9.7 Wetland Mitigation. CFC shall comply with all conditions contained in the Process IV Hearing Examiner Decision dated April 23, 2004 and attached hereto as Exhibit H. 10. Other Project Review Processes and Minor Modifications. 10.1 Other Project Review Processes. The Project will be subject to building permit review and other applicable review processes. The final design of the buildings and other improvements, precise location of building footprints, location of utilities, determination of access points, and other design issues will be determined during that process and must be consistent with the Agreement. 10.2 Modifications. Minor modifications to the Plan may be approved by the Director of Community Development Services and processed in accordance with FWCC 22-1680. Factors to be considered by the Director of Community Development Services when determining if a modification to the Plan is minor include but are not limited to the following.: a. Activity changes (excluding change of use of the principal use or expansion of accessory uses as specified herein) or increases in square footage of gross floor area as defined by FWCC section 22-1 that do not result in significant additional or modified trip generation or distribution. b. Changes in the location or number of access points that do not impact traffic safety or modify trip distribution. c. Requests for modification oflandscaping pursuant to FWCC 22-1570. 9 d. Removal of significant trees in conjunction with other actions deemed minor. e. Addition of fewer than twenty parking stalls outside of areas containing "significant trees" as defined by FWCc. f. Exterior changes that do not significantly add to or alter approved architectural design. g. Actions that do not result in impacts to the environment pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act requiring issuance of a mitigated threshold detennination of nonsignificance. h. Actions that do not require review by the hearing examiner. A modification is not minor if the Director of Community Development Services detennines that there will be substantial changes in the impacts on the neighborhood or the city as a result of the change. Modifications that are not minor modifications are major modifications and shall require City Council approval pursuant to FWCC 22-1680. 11. Waiver and Mutual Release of Claims of Invalidity. The City and CFC acknowledge and represent that the tenns of this Agreement have been jointly negotiated and that each party enters into this Agreement voluntarily. Further, CFC and the City agree that this Agreement is authorized under law and each party waives any claim that the Agreement is invalid or illegal. The agreements and representations in this Section are material to this Agreement and are being relied upon by both parties. 12. General Provisions. 12.1- Binding on Successors. 12.1.1 The Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their successors in interest, and may be assigned to any successor in interest to the Project property. 12.1.2 This Agreement is intended to protect the value of, and facilitate the use and development of, the Property and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the City. Therefore, the covenants set forth herein shall be construed to and do touch and concern the Property and the benefits and burdens inuring to CFC and to the City from this Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon CFC, its heirs, successors, and assigns, and upon the City. 12.2 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Venue for any action to enforce the tenns of this Agreement shall be in King County Superior Court. 12.3 Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. 12.4 Authority. The City and CFC each represents and warrants to the other that it has the respective power and authority, and is duly authorized, to execute and deliver this Agreement and that the persons signing on its behalf are duly authorized to do so. CFC further represents and warrants that it is the fee owner of the Property, that it has authority to agree to the covenants and 10 provisions contained herein, and that there are no other persons, entities, or parties with any fee interest in the Property. 12.5 Amendment. This Agreement may be modified only by written instrument authorized by the City Council and duly executed by the City Manager and CFC, and their successors and assigns consistent with FWCC 22-1679; provided, however, notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, the City of Federal Way may, without the agreement ,of CFC, adopt and impose upon the Property restrictions and development regulations different than those set forth herein, if required by a serious threat to public health and safety. Moreover, as provided in Section 5 of the Agreement, five years after the date of the execution of the Agreement, the City may elect, without the agreement of CFC, to apply development regulations in effect at that time to any development within the scope of the Agreement that has not been completed at that time. 12.6 Exhibits. All exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein. 12.7 Headings. The headings in this Agreement are inserted for reference only and shall not be construed to expand, limit or otherwise modify the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 12.8 Integration; Scope of Agreement. This Agreement and its exhibits represent the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. There are no other agreements, oral or written, except as expressly set forth herein. This Agreement does not set forth all conditions applicable to the Project to the extent that additional conditions may be imposed as part of any permit issued by the City, as required by the Federal Way City Code as determined by the discretion of the Directors of the Departments of Community Development Services and/or Public Works. 12.9 Enforcement. Subject to the notice and cure provisions of this section, in the event either party fails to satisfy any of its obligations under this Agreement, the other party shall have the right to enforce this Agreement by an action at law for damages or in equity for specific performance. The Parties acknowledge that damages are not an adequate remedy for breach by either party. In addition to the remedies set forth herein, in the event of a breach of this Agreement by CFC, the City may enforce this Agreement under the enforcement provisions of the Federal Way City Code in effect at the time of the breach and/or it may terminate this Agreement and take action to amend the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation of the Property. No party shall be in default under this Agreement unless it has failed to perform its duties or obligations under this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice of default from the other party. A notice of default shall specify the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which the default may be cured. If the nature of the default is such that it cannot be reasonably cured within thirty (30) days, then a party shall not be deemed in default if the party commences a cure within thirty (30) days and, thereafter, diligently pursues completion of the cure. 12.10 Attorneys Fees. In any action brought to enforce this Agreement or for damages resulting from a breach thereof, the prevailing party as determined by the court, shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees. 11 12.11 Police Power. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to diminish, restrict or limit the police powers of the City granted by the Washington State Constitution or by general law. This Agreement is an exercise of the City's police powers, the authority granted under RCW 36.70B.170-.2l0, and other laws. 12.12 Recording; Assignment. The Agreement shall be recorded with the Real Property Records Division of the King County Records and Elections Department. 12.13 No Third Parties. The Agreement is made and entered into for the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. No other person or entity is an intended third party beneficiary. No other person or entity shall have any right of action under this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunto placed their hand and seals on the day and year indicated. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington municipal corporation CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, a Washington nonprofit corporation BY: BY: David H. Moseley, City Manager Casey Treat, President Date: Date: ATTEST: This - day of ,2004. N. Christine Green, CMC Federal Way City Clerk Approved as to Form for City of Federal Way: Approved as to Form for Christian Faith Center: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson Brian Lawler. Lawler Burroughs & Baker, PC 12 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. ) COUNTY OF KING On this day, personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, Casey Treat to me known to be the President of CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, a Washington non-profit corporation, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal this - day of ,2004. (notary signature) (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires: K: \CFC\documents \c fcdevagrOnOO4 13 EXHIBIT A TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPERTY PER CHICAGO TITLE CO. ORDER #553764 PARCELS 1-6,8-9,11,12-13 & TAX LOT #59 IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 21, T21N, R4E, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TAX LOT #59 PER STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED REC. #9706091592 THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR SOUTH 341 ST. PLACE BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER NUMBER 8410170757, SAID INSTRUMENT BEING A RE-RECORD OF INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8111020670. EXHIBIT B TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN NA riVE GROWTH PROTECTION TRACT ( <Ii ~~- PARKING STALLS PROVIDED: 1,406 -1,540 in AS OF: MAY 10,2004 ~~. - S341st.P-,---- ~ /' /' 0 " ~ Abbey Road EXHIBIT C TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LIST OF PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES Christian Faith Center - Chart of Uses li~+~J!~lt:U~~~fIBJ~rfj¡j~~'it', ";"\""'~"'" " Sanctuary/School Auditorium (Includes Stage) 4,500 Seats Multi-purpose rooms Bookstore with Café Youth Church (Multi-purpose rooms/chapel) Children's Church (Chapels, classrooms) Daycare Music Area - Choir Room (Room behind stage) Other Areas (Storage facilities, mechanical rooms, computer/phone room, TV/audio department, baptismal, kitchen, distribution center, hallways, facilities offices, wedding chapel, meeting room, bathrooms, etc,) Dominion College (Classrooms, offices) SF ,~ 33,054 4) 'le!,U 8,ö ¡ 94 3,702,16 14,095.82 [I, ", ""'f = 15,489.99 = 1 !,563..:.£i9 n~ 1,772.37 60,292,97 2,581.72 1 st Floor Sub-total 166,903.00 1'$ANCT~Af{Y'2nd FLOOR .~~~-----_.~.._. -----'-'-----' --.. ,-,-_u . - ~Y...__... J Dominion College (Future multi-purpose rooms, classrooms, library and staff offices) Sub-total Total 21,062.82 18,)¡)8.96 12,24:.1.22 -,., 51,5~7.00 218,500.00 ,~. ,$Fd 101.')j(;í)O - " 101 ,~)¿(j.OO 101,526,00 Administrative Offices Other Areas (Storage facilities, Hallways, Bathrooms, etc.) 2nd Floor Sub-total Grand Total ~A~ÉAITft$ê.t¡1~gh '" . '..::,.,.'"" ,,', ' Christian Faith School (Private School) 900 Students , " ,." 'H" u'" "0 EXHIBIT D TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT J 19 ~. ".. t' '. '..¡.<;fíf~:H;.l , SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") made this St./i1. day of (drV41:j-, 19ÇjJ?, by and between the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as tCCITY", and FEDERAL WAY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "FWIP". WHEREAS, CITY commenced a Petition for Condemnation in the King County Superior Court under cause #95-2-19577-6; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto have reached an agreement settling all claims in that condemnation action; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The CITY OF FEDERAL WAY shall be granted an irrevocable, exclusive and permanent easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit up' and incorporated herein by this reference (UEasement") granting to the City the free and uninterrupted use over, across and through certain real property ("PropertyU) located in Federal Way, King County,' Washington and legally described in Exhibit "A" to the Easement. The City's rights shall be exercised-upon that portion of the Property legally described in Exhibit "B" to the Easement (" Easement Area.") 2. In consideration of the grant of the Easement by FWIP to the CITY and upon execution of this Agreement and satisfaction of the contingencies set forth in Paragraph 17, the CITY shall pay to FWIP the sum of Five Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($5,000.00) simultaneously with the recording of the Easement. - 1 - «: (Q) [P)f 0 (- ORIGINAL J:\C06125\K1500S\OOO29307.3 Exhibit 'tII", . attached hereto, and by this reference fully incorporated ("wetland Buffer' Areafl) . The Wetland Buffer Area shall be applicable to all future developments on the property. 5. FWIP shall be allowed by the CITY to handle storm water retention/detention for any project on the Property, by constructing, in compliance with then-applicable codes (which as of this date are found in the King County Surface Water Design Manual) and at its expense, such conveyance systems as are reasonably necessary to provide for direct gravity flow drainage of storm water from the Property, to the storm water facility which the CITY is constructing on the Easement Area, so as to eliminate the need for storm water retention/detention on those portions of the Property which naturally drain to the Easement Area. FWIP'S right tò allow such drainage shall be limited to waters which currently naturally drain to the Easement Area and shall be limited to the initial development of the Property and shall not be extended to any redevelopment of the Property. flInitial development" shall mean the initial development of each phase of all of the Property. 6. The CITY agrees that the Easement Area may, at .the option of FWIP, be included in any calculation of open space required for the development of the Property. The Easement Area may, at the option of FWIP, also be included in computing maximum lot coverage for development of the Property. Nothing herein shall relieve FWIP from complying with the city's landscape or other requirements for development. sl1<ll~pa~~a.llt~costs~urelâted 0.. tò~'Cobta ining .';(lPPr9Yg~t;9.J:.~and."~<i~velôþing~rtlièmEasemenQr-Apea, as a storm water Í>,' ..~'." "'~..." . 7. The CITY - ) - J:\C0612S\H1S00S\OOO29307.3 v .' . .. ~~::~h::ì:' b::: : e::: na: ::u:: = ... i:~:O: i::::':: .~':j::: ::::i:::.~ . L spirit of this provlslon~ 11. CITY staff will support a proposal through lot line &mination to combine lot 2 and lot 3 of the short plat recordéd þder King County Auditor #811030086950 as to be considered as one "- ~ "'Q. ;1) lot for development purposes. 12. CITY staff will support an application by FWIP to extend the parking lot improvements on lot 4 of the short plat recorded under King County Auditor #8110300869 into the Wetland Buffer Area up to the western toe of the slope of the berm forming the western boundary of the retention/detention facility, provided, that appropriate mitigation, determined pursuant to city codes, such as planting on the edge of the berm, is provided by FWIP. To the extent that the city staff requests mitigation for the loss of Wetland Buffer, said request shall be reasonable in comparison to other sim{lar proposals, such that the request is not used to circumvent the spirit of this provision. 13. CITY staff will support a variance, pursuant to city codes, .from the required lot size for. lot 4 of the short plat recorded under King County Auditor #8110300869 .to.allow development of building improvements on said lot due to the limitations on the : ability ,to écombine lot 4:;with .other ._lotsL.oLthe,short~:plat. 14. CITY staff will support parking lot improvements in the portion of the Wetland Buffer Area south of the roadway of lot 2 of the short plat recorded under Auditor #8110300869. with appropriate mitigation costs, pursuant to city codes, to be provided by FWIP. - 5 - J: \CO6125 \M tSOO5\OOOZ930l. 3 17. The obligations under this Agreement are conditioned upon and subject to final approval of this Agreement by the city Council of Federal Way. 18. This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between these parties. Any prior.understanding or representation of any kind preceding the date of this Agreement shall not be binding on either party except to the extent incorporated in this document. 19. It is agreed that this Agreement will be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the Laws of the state of Washington. 20. Any modification of this Agreement or additional obligation assumed by either party ln connection with this Agreement shall be binding only if evidenced by a writing signed by each party or an authorized representative of each party- 21. Thi's Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 22. Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Agreement, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of their respective successors in interest and assigns. 23. In the event either of the parties defaults on the performance of any terms of this Agreement or either party places the enforcement of this Agreement in the hands of an attorney, or files a lawsuit, each party shall pay all its own attorney's fees, - 7 - J:\CO6125\H15005\OOO29307.3 - 'INC.,:a washington corporati~:>n,. who executed the foregoing . ument and acknowledged the sa1d 1nstrument to be the free ;md ntary 'act and dee~ of said corporation, for the Uses a.nd )oses therein ment1oned, and on oath stated that he was .horized to execute the said instrument and that the seal aff ¡xed the corporate seal of said corporation. affixed the day and ~~k~ NOTARY PUBLIC in and f~e sta. te of Washington, residing at ãÞ U~--' My appointment expires on t-cJq',-'IL__. ) ) SSe ) On this ~3r&. day of Fe brùtU'~' 19'1'-:" before mef the undersigned, a Notary Public in and f r the state of Washinqton, duly commissioned and sw. ~rn, personally appear:d ker1l1eÝ11 z=~. . /i: ; /, "r"~) to me known to be the ~, 4B£pect1Ycï:y= of the C;Tt OF FEDERAL WAY, a municipal corporatl0n, who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free' ,1nd voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses ,1Ild purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he Was authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year firs~'b~Q~\,written. -'<~~ HU8¿ '~ ~ .: <V'::~~."'""" ~& . ~~. '. ;' .:::::!j---~~'"" 0 . It. ,. 4J: <?'OTAR-'" ~ ~ . ~ g ~..2' NOTAR PUBLIC in and f the St te of ~ <8,\ PuaUC Washington, residing at ~dt1<fJ! ZJtl.1--' "'--?;:"'.l.~~: My appointment expires on /-.21'-9:1 ( . '.- <-. """'" :T tt,OPWAS 7. \\u ,'- STATE OF WA::JH'lN'GTON ) . ~mA/) SSe C a UN T Y 0 F -PfflftCE- ~ VII "0 ) On this f? day of FEß£ v\~, 19~, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the state of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Helmut Wallenfels, to me known to be the Senior Legal Counsel of WEYERHAEUSER COMPI\NY, a Washington corporation, who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes th, ¡,in mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the - 9 - J:\C06125\HI5005\OOO29307.3 - '.. . .'. .."..- .' .". .. c. . . EXHIBIT I ... '.- . ;<- :.. f 'Z~'¥l;~'¡1 fiLED fOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: THIS SPACE RESERVED fOR RECORDER'S USE: federal Vay Industrial Park (Appl.icant's Name) HAIL TO: CITY Of fEDERAL VAY 33530 1st vay South fEDERAL VAY, VA 98003 ATTN: Londi K. Lindell P£ RfW( E M T /EX CL US I VE EASEJÐ( T for and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable,consideration, the receipt of \/hich ¡ h, ",!oy acknowledged, federal Vay Industrial Park' ("f\lIP"), a \lashingtoo corporation ("Grantor"), grants, {d' "'f' <¡rl warrants to the CITY OF fEDERAL \lAY, a \lashington ~icipal corporation ("Grantee") for the purposes he, ; ,." set forth a perpetual, exclusive and permanent easement.U1der, across'and over certain real pro¡,:.ty (the "Property«) located in federal \lay, \lashington, legally described as follows: legal Description of Property', attached hereto as,ExhibiC..Aí, and incorporated herein by this reference.' '.C-'".',~, ," ';' Except as may be otherwise set forth herein, Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon that portion of the Property ("Easement") legally described as follows: legal Description of Easêmeot' attached hereto as fXìítbÎJ::~8" and incorporated herein by this reference. ' ~ ,1. ~j>urpose. Grantee and its agents, designees ,and/or assigns shall have the perpetual, exclusive and permanent right, without prior notice to Grantor, at such times as d~ necessary by Grantee, to enter upon the Property to inspect, design, construct, reçonstruct, operate, ,maintain, repair, replace, remove, grade, excßvi1te, and enlarge all surface water facilities including, but not limited to, UYier.gr<X.nd facilities and/or sy:;t('{1\'; upon and/or under the Easement, together with all appurtenances thereto, including without limitation outlet structures, control structures, pipes, catch basins , manholes; retent ion and detention faci l i ti es, ponds, biofiltration swales, water quality treatmeotfacilities, vaults and ditches ("facilities"). follollir19 the initial construction of the facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities or inçrovements as it may require. Grantee shall have the right to flood the Easement. In addition to the foregoing, Grantee shall have the right to engage in any and all activities as if'Grantee 0II0Cd fee title to the Easement. 2. ~ccess. If reasonable access to the Easement is not otherwise available, Grantee shall h~ve the right of access to the Easement over and across the Property to enable Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder. 3. obstructions; laOOscaping. Grantee I113Y remove any and all vegetation, trees, or other obstructions within the Easement, and may level and grade the Easement. 4. Grantor's Use of Easement. Except as hereafter provided, this Easement shall be exclusive to Grantee; provided, however, Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement in oNkr to c~ly with City code requirement:. for opeo space, greenbelt or maxillUlllot coverage; provided, however, that such right does not incll.lde coílplyin'J with the City's laOOscape code or other code requirements. Grantor may install, at its expense on I in c~l lance wi th all appl icable la\.tS, such faci li ties as are reasonably necessary to provide for direct dl scharge of storm water from the Property to the Easement after obtaining all necessary permits. Grantor's right to use the Easement for purposes of calculating open space, green belts or maximum lot coverage shall not entitle Grantor to enter upoo or disturb the Easement for any reasoo. Except as necessary to provide draimge facilities from the Property to the Easement, Grantor shall not perform digging, tlfi1CUing or other fonn of construction activity on the Property, \/hich would disturb the c~ction or unearth the faciliti~s ~\ the Easement, or endanger the lateral support to the facilities. Grantor shall not blast within fifteCfl 1',' ','et of the Easemeot. Provided further as to the area described as "The East 175.5 feet of the North 31\ I l of tract X of King CotXIty Short Plat No. 281074 and the South 30 feet of the Easement area of lot 3 of the Plat," this Eas~t shall be non-exclusive and Grantor or its successors or assigns may construct a road and conl('ct to exist:ng utilities in said area, if done in cüœ?tiance ~:th applicable codes. J:\C06125\H1S005\0002?4S3.#2 .- ::fl'-?:¥~\~~.~~;, .',1?Í',¡!ff#~~:;:;'~ -': -; s. l~fflc8~tlon. Grantor agrees to waive any and ell clallllS relating to any damage to the Easement, Incluêf¡"ög"'tlÏöse"resul tlng from surface water flooding end further to i~ify om hold Grontee, its elected officials, officers, ~loyees, agents, om vollXlteershanaless from any end all claims, demand:;, tosses, actions ond lIablll tIes Onclu:ling costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or eut It I es, Including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, orlslng from, resulting from, or connected with Grantor or Grantor's agents', employees', or Invltees' negligent ectlons. 6. Successors and AssIgnS'~ The rights 000 obligations of the parties shall i(Y.Jre to the benefit of OM be binding upon their respective successors-in Interest, heirs ond assigns; provided, hOWever, that Grantor's right to discharge stona.water to the Easement shall be limited to waters ~Ich currently nsturally drain to the Easement and Ghall only oWly to the Inltlel development of the Property and not to any redevelOfxocnt of th~ Property. ...ll such redevelopment will be re<pired to cooçly with all appllceble lows end codes. "1/\\ tial development" Ghall mean the initial development of each phase of ell of the Property. 7. Ho Encutbronces. "Grantor shall IMintain the Easement free of all eoctI1Úrances and defects and Is prohibited from recording or taking any action ~ich results in ,the recording of ony lien, eocuWrance or other <kfect against the Easement. DATED THIS MY of , 1996. QW(Tœ awlTŒ fEDERAL ~AY INDUSTRIAL PARK CITY Of fEDERAL ~AY By: By: Kenneth E. Nyberg Its: Its: City Manager UEYERHAEUSER COHPANY APPROVED AS TO fORK: 8y: Helcoot \lallenfels Seni or le11a l COU'\Sel Its: Landi K. Lindell, City Attorney J:\C06125\H1500S\OOO294S3.#2 .'..'-' ' STATE Of ~^SHINGTOH COONTY Of ) ) sa. ) On this - day of , 1996, before me, the ~rsigoed, a Notary Plblic in and for the State of \lashlngton, dJlycoornissloned and SllOrn, personally appeared . to me ~ to be the of FEDERAL UAY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC., the corporation that executed the for~oinglnstruneot, and acl::no1.lledçed the said Instruneot to be the free and voluntary act and <ked of Gaid corporation, for the uses and purposes therein ~tloned, and on Oðth stated that he/she was authorized to execute said Instruneot and that the seal affixed, If any, Is the corporate seal of said corporation. \lITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Plblic in and for the State of Vashington. Ky coornission expires: STATE OF ~^SHINGTOH COONTY OF ) ) ss. ) On this - day of , 1996, before me, the ~rsigoed, a Notary Public in and for the State of \lashington, duly coornissioned and SllOrn, perGonally appeared Kenneth E. Nyberg, to me kn<wn to be the City Manager of the City of Federal Vay, a Vashington lIU1icipal corporation, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrunent, and ocl::no1.lledged the said instrunent to be the free and voluntary act and deed 0: ';aid corporation, for the uses and purposes therein I\eOtioned, and on oath stoted that he was authorized to cxecute said instrunent. ' UITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first obove written. (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in &nd for the State of Vashington. Ky coornission expires: STATE Of UASHINGTOH COONTY Of ) ) &s. ) On this - day of ' , 1996. before me, the ~rsigoed, a Notary Plblic' in and for the State of Uashington, dJly coorni&sioned and SllOrn, personally appeared HelllUt Vallenfel&, to me known to be the Senior legal Counsel of VEYERHAEUSER COKPANY. the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged the &aid Instrunent to be the free and volU1tary a<:t and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said ,ínstruneot and that the seal affixed, If any, Is the corporate &eal of said corporation. UITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first obove written. (typed/printed name of notory) Notary Plblíc in end for the Stote of Vashlngton. Ky COCI1IIi&sion expires: J:\C06125\H1S005\OOO2945J.#l ." .'.'::~~.:%.~~:ã.~~it'~m¡i\i't'W.:;:~j¡,'o/~~tk,';J~~,~~"-.';!;'¡~.;~(19",t.~~~" ~~' '~F. <, .,' '<":r~¿}\);:l*~~,,,~'~?;~H'>"'~:~~'-::.1)~n;j!.'.:';{~il:~;l:;:i",;'I~£~ ¡.. ~~I.J,.. . '. ')":":'::,~r:::":::"" \.. :.:" ";""-:~~~~:<"¿',".; ". """""~;~f.:;)? (,,"" EXHIBIT "Ate TO P ERMANEN'r I EX CL U S IVE EAS EMENT PARCEL A: Lot 3, King County Short Plat No. 281074, according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. PARCEL B: Lot 4 of King County Short Plat No. 281074 according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. PARCEL C: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King CounLy, Washington, described as follows: '" ) Commencing at the northwest corner of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence south 89°13'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 261.26 feet; thence south 00°14'39" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00°14'39" west a distance of 546.02 feet; thence south 89°13'33" east a distance of 399.45 feet; thence north 00°14'39" eas~ a distance of 546.02 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; , thence north 89°13'33" west along said south right of way margln a distance of 399.44 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 0: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W .M., in,'King County, Washington. described as Enllnw~' Commencing at the northwest corner of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence south 89°13'33" seconds east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 813.80 feet; thence south 00° 14' 58" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south. right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00°14'58" west a distance of 670.67 feet; thence north 89°16'45" west. a distance of 153.10 feet; thence north 00°].4'39" east a distance of 670.81 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence south 89°13'33" east along said south right. of way marg1n a distance of 153.10 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County for Soutll 336th Street. under Recording Number üGO903037..2. EXHIBIT "A" TO PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT Pg. L 0 [ L 0:-0"'- -;;j¡~r~.";-):'d'.1""'oO------ ;:,... ""'ir:')Ý':!-i~~""J'1~"';:-'~-- -:-~":~'?".~ ;: *-i'~-l >- -- Pg. 1 of 8 nif72J.lù...doc - ---.:-à': - ---' 'co'- -. .. .. ;j(f\\~:~( -'-,-! ' ~EGAL DESCRlPTIC PROPOSED EASEMENT ACQUISmONS ON STRANICK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9084 That part of Lot 3, King County Short Plat No. 281074, according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 811 0300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East:, W.M., in King County, Washington. Being described as follows: Beginrung at the northwest comer of said Lot 3 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, thence south 88° 15'52" east a distance of 162.06 feet; thence south 23°35'30" west a distance of 231.61 feet to a point on a non- tangent curve having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence along said curve to the right 32.63 feet through a central angle of 06° 13'56"; thence north 59°09'15" west a distance of 27.40 feet to the beginning of a curve having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence along said curve to the left 25.27 feet through a central angle of 04°49'33"; thence north 01°44'08" east a distance of 175.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "B" TO r E RMANE.NT I EX CLU S I VE EAS EMENT ~.. :~-.~ ,::¡:: ..-c.--" ~. ~t~.:...:~~ EXHIBIT "B" TO PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE EAS~NT Pg, 2 of 8 i . rwtRAL WAY P\JBUC WORJ- AD~o¡,¡ DMSIN "'C' ""'n. q., M)' 0.119 .......... "tT\.~ ~....Y .,,-..-..- ....~!y \><s ~ I/"(~r Ci' "" ~OT A RECORD O~ SURVEY I'OR INPOIUIA TION ONl. Y t fit: <>1I"o..u ...,LJjòT¡¡. - --~. 11--."" ""W::.~~~èV""""'O<"" CAS(I«~T STR~'JOHNS PAACCL '71,100.", ., '"-" '...~ ¡;:;j;jõ ,:~.:' ',',;: ':'. ::f:;=,C}\>:;'ij;' . . .~ ',. ~ Pg. 3 of 8 ntí711 du..doc , . , '. i, :":?';~~ ~:~~~~~~::~~~?f~5~1~~~ftf:~m~~y'~~~~':' LEGAL DESCRIPTU PROPOSED EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS ON STRANICK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9026 , , , ';"~""~;;'~""."~" ". .' .J.,"..- "'. "."'. '. '-".::.':. " " That part of Lot 4 of King County Short Plat No. 281074 according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Wasrungton. Being described as follows: The North 30 feet of said Lot 4 Also The East 140 feet of said Lot 4 Also The East 175.50 feet of the North 30 feet of Tract X of said short plat No, 281074, EXHIBIT "B" TO PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE F.ASEMENT ~ ~ ê.a ~H (1tú t-IH c:H en - H - ;;â~ f;':~ I . . """r.-' ,'~ Pg. 5 of 8 n({721a.1u..doc ,. ,-," :',. --.,,-' !..' ,: ,..',:,t,'..;;',.~~.".,;:.,<.~,.,~" -'-"';':':'>"";'(;~'D;'~~'~?~~'t"dQ-Î.\"¡<;'i.i:it . ;,".':,;:}~;~Y~'.;}:~t:'; ...' ~ ,~, :.-,:', ""':~"'?"l'<'~~~.,.'¡!r""';,"" .,' . " '. '~,: ',':' ,;;",.:,.-~:::,'1,"~:':":;"'..' LEGAL D ES CRJ1i T... ,Ai PROPOSED EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS ON STRANICK-JOBNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9067 That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M, in King County, Washington. described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter, thence south 89° 13'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 813.80 feet; thence south 00° 14'58" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89° 13'33" west along said south right of way margin á distance of 100.82 feet and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence south 00° 14'58" west a distance of 181.30 feet; thence south 22°37'48" west a distance of 137.29 feet; thence north 00°14'58" east to the south right of way margin a distance of 308.73 feet; thence south 89° 13'33" east along said south right of way margin a distance of 52.29 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.; EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County for South 336th Street under Recording Number 8609030322. Being a portion of the following described property: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M, in King County, Waslûngton, described as follows: Commencing at the 'northwest comer of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter, thence south 89° 13'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 813.80 feet; thence south 00° 14'58" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00° 14'58" west a distance of 670.67 feet; thence north 89° 16'45" west a distance of 153.10 feet; thence north 00° 14'39" east a distance of 670.81 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence south 89° 13'33" east along said south right of way margin a distance of 153.10 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County for South 336th Street under Recording Number 8609030322, EXHIBIT "8" TO , PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT ::~~:, ';'.ii; .' ~tt:' ,~I , {;.l~. . :::.1iÄi; ,~" ' Pg. 6 of 8 EXHIBIT "B" TO PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE EASEMFÆT .:l;'_':> ' 'I ; " " l' '. .. . ';.- 4 <. . , <::;/ ""';',",,',,'" o""';¡"""""""'~fci:""~"""'" ',"0,< ,...,~". ".' , . ,- .' '. :':::'~::~;' ",,:{:,,:';>rr~;,};~.~;k."¡::;?A:R'.'.11f.~I/~;\~<1~. ~..!G."','!.1-,.fi~.."I. " íSÆf¿.' .." , ,:.., ' ' , : '.' ,...,.:.-...,. ;:,".~..;.,q~"",-".,:'-yt.~~Ti !;~~ LEGAL DESCRIPTI, . . "":::", :(.:\.~::~I:~"l , , '. . .. " < PROPOSED EASEI.\1ENT ACQUISITIONS ON ,. -: STRANICK-.TOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9069 That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 2l, Township 2l North, Range 4 East, W.M, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter, , Úlence south 89° U'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 261.26 feet; thence south 00° 14'39" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00° 14'39" west a distance of 546.02 feet; thence south 89° l3'33" east a distance of 302.06 feet; thence north 22°37'48" east a distance of 255.66; thence north 00° 14'39" east a distance of 308.73 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89° Dr3)" west along said south right of way margin a distance of 399.44 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Being a portion of the following described property: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence south 89° 13'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 261.26 feet; , thence south 00° 14'39" west a distance of30.00 feet to the south rightof way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00° l4r39" west a distanceof546.02 feet; thence south 89° 13'33" east a distance of 399.45 feet; . thence north 00° l4'39" east a distance of 546.02 feet to the said SOUtll right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89° U'33" west along said south right of way margin a , distance of 399.44 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "B" TO PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT Pg. 7 of 8 ntf72J..llI..doc t ? .' ... ~ ~ ~ 8 : . - ~ r. ,; ; j '-,--- ; /' I~ .~~ :;-: ~ C.i_h-:"::-_:' _/ -------------- --------- . . . . . /,- ;,/: : . -- / / t-d OQ 00 0 H¡ 00 t-d I ê.~ ~b a"-' t-<H qH CI:1 - Htii ~ : ~.~ CI:1 I , '. '^.'-i'..~....,.-.. ,,':, ,..".."";",/",;~;"""":."",'-:i;"..:,,,,.,:~t..:_',."" "'<¿:ç~~;;:~~~~i'}j;;:(, ,;:', ~:"~.""..,,,.;~:;,t;.~'-"""""i-}"'Y~~.!'~Sl*"t~" . "'. "'"", ',~},,'::'~<!'r¡,;,:,::,~;;,,""'),.<.\L""'~~;i~'/ :,' ' " EXHIBIT IfrrfC TO S EITLEMENT AGREEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION WETLAND AND SETBACK STRANICK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO, 212104-9084 That part of Lot 3, King County Short Plat No. 281074, according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21. Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. Being described as follows: BeginrÜng at the northeast comer of said Lot 3 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence south 32°41' 52" west a distance of 78.31 feet; thence south 37° 15'37" west a distance of 39.29 feet; thence south 40°11 '22" west a distance of 50.40 feet; thence south 49°02'32" west a distanée of 84.35 feet; thence south 67°33' 51 It west a distance of 26.93 feet; thence south 45°20'35" west a distance of 9.06 feet to the south line of said Lot 3 and a point on a non-tangent curve from which the radiUs point bears north 25°22'36" east; thence along said south line through a 300 foot radius curve to the right, with a central angle of 05°28'06", an arc length of 28~63 feet; thence north 59°09' 19" west a distance of 27.40 feet; thence along a 300 foot radius curve to the left, with a central angle of 04°49'-33 ", an arc length of 25.27 feet to the west line of said Lot 3; thence along said west line, north 01°44'08" east a distance of 175.99 feet to the north line of said Lot 3; thence along said north line, south'88°15'52" east a distance of 259.45 feeUo the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING Containing an area of 0.864 acres. v (f;tl'&~'---.~~~~~~,:'~'~ '~' .'7.. G. '" -,"... ' I:: ¡";.',...~')..,."..'.'\Þ,~'I;.. ;¡ r" t.r.""""""'<l":' fl/"v:Q:>"_"'L::!;-,'._;~ <:'- ~1 ~~7:~;.\ >~=~~-,..-;.<~::~\ =; . ¡ . ',' .(:..;- , ~ ';:- . , r, ~, ::: (;fA ,- ",': ,,~ ~~ [) r~, ?~;~;f~;i~}Y 1 tl ~~~. ~.}, :...',- ': " -.,~~-=.it t' \,~ S<P:i-,~'3 "1', Z- ? t.1 '<..>--",...-,-~-,.,.,....~ . -~--,-:.- "-'->..""-'«..../-'...L.""':" ',":'~~---" fwld9084,wp5 EXHIBIT "II" TO S ETTL EMENT A G RE EMENT Pg. 1 of 9 1 .... .... .... ;: ~ f ~ a ! ... ... g ~ ,.. ..., .. ,- --_/ -._- ,/ ; ------------ - H' HI ------- I ------------\-_._------- Íô . '.t~~~:/ f f-ú OQ N 0 t-i) \Q C/) tt1 ~a ~E ZH H Þ>-H <;1H ~ = ~ë5 ~ = , '" ... .' ~,,:;/:~,~~~;":~,:,;i',?~" "',"';:':'.::. ':;::*~~ìfH:;,{,:. .. . 'I, . LEGAL DESCRIPTION WETLAND AND SETBACK STRANICK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9026 That part of Lot 4 of King County Short Plat No, 281074 according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. Being described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 4; . thence along the north line of said Lot 4, south 88° 15'53" east a distance of 116.96 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along the north line of said Lot 4, south 88°15'53" east a distance of 82.96 feet; thence along the east line of said Lot4,'south 01°12'17" west a distance of 100.00 feet; thence along the north line of said Lot 4, south 88°15'53" east a distance of 140.00 feet; thence along the east line of said Lot 4, south 01°44'08" west a distance of 175.99 feet to the south line of said Lot 4 and a point on a non-tangent curve from wlùch the radius point bears south 26°01 '09" west; thence along said south line through a 300 foot radius curve to the left, with a central- angle of 21°00'20", an arc length of 109.98 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve from which the radius point bears north 70°49'35" east; thence through a 100 foot radius curve to the right, with a cen.tral angle of 38°16'07", an arc length of 66.79 feet; thence north 45°55'34" west a distance of 40.72 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve from wlúch the radius point bears north 07°40'45" east; - thence through a 100 foot radius curve to the right, 'with a central angle of88°34'17", an arc length of 154.59 feet; , thence north 06°05'23" east a distance of 49.78feetto the TRUE POINT'OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 0.716 acres. fwld9026.wp5 ;/' EXHIBIT "IIef TO SETILEMEt$r AGREEMENT Pg. J of 9 ._- J ,. ... .s: Il ~ t ~ ~ r g r ~ g : g : g ~ ~ 3 õ t r. t -< \I g -< ~ g t . ~ 0 C>R ~ (>~ I>'; 0 ~ 0 ~ ;.;" ~~ :..~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ;;¡ '? ~ r ~ ?'! ~ ;: ~ 0 ~ :: ~ ;¡ 0 0 ~~ 0 t~ t6 ¡: g ~ 0:; ow ~ ':~ ~ ':"" ~., ~ :¡ g ~ À '- t-d OQ -Þ- 0 HI \D (/) þj H ~~ ~~ ~~ > : <i1H ~'1 ~~ !Z H .. '_",~." . ,.,., .' ..;..'~.,,'. . . . . :.H"'>i"""'" ..' (/.' . " .... ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION WETLAND AND SETBACK STRANrCK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9067 That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North. Range 4 East:. W.M., in King County. Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said northwést quarter of the northwest quarter, thence south 89°13'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 813 .80 feet; thence south 00°14'58" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89° 13 '33" west along said south right of way margin a distance of 27.58 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence south 12°03'08" east a distance of 40.46 feet thence south 07°31 '30" west a distance of 41.08 feet thence south 04°45' 10" west a distance of 57.84 feet thence south 10°37'22" west a distance of 52.16 feet thence south 16°21' 59" west a distance of 56.28 feet thence south 10°58'46" west a distance of 43.83 feet thence south 23°54'07" west a distance of 14.53 feet thence south 07°11 '32" west a distance of 38.28 feet thence south 21°58'46" west a distance of 37.77 feet thence south 08°31 '59" west a distance of 41.88 feet thence south 24°20'39" west a distance of 91.29 feet thence south 31 °04' 46" west a distance of 3 2.34 feet thence south 19°31 '25" west a distance of 20.75 feet thence north 00°14'39" east a distanœ of 546.07 feetto the south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence south 89° 13 '33" east along said south right of way margin a distance of 125.52 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; . . EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County for South 336th Street under Recording Number 8609030322, Containing an area of L053 acres. Being a portion of the following described property: That portion of thc northwest quartcr of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M" in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence south 89° 13' 33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 813.80 feet; EXHIBIT ulllt TO S ETI'L EMEN11. A GRE EME NT Pg. 5 of 9 , . .<. .;, . .' '- j' . ",' ,"-:-:"""""" -:.".,~¡>'"~;';..:o";,;""",,,:,,,'~f<1~:.:...:;:,~\;:.:;~~~<-'"i ,:~ò\:":'-'::' ':'",,' """"-"-':\0 ::.'-<.,"':r'~-." "".!.....1"",-},:,~",;:"""<,,,-i;.~:""'~f.;.',;;:~~¡,,~:~~'W. :;, ,',:\ <':" ,:;::",,~',"'.':'<.r;,.-: """""J.:':-e::..:,\;~~,..-,::y~,';...:;-'"".;;1,~~:~-f\..<'~:'..,;: .. . thence south 00°14'58" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00°14'58" west a distance of 670.67 feet; thence north 89°16'45" west a distance of 153.10 feet; thence north 00° 14'39" east a distance of 670.81 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence south 89°13'33" east along said south right of way margin a distance of 153.10 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County for South 336th Street under Recording Number 8609030322. Containing an area of 2.3 13 acres. fwld9067.wp5 Pg. 6 of 9 EXHIBIT uIlu TO S EITL EMENT A G RE EMENT 2 EXHIBIT "n" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Pg. 7 of 9 S 12.03'01 C 'O,H' S 01')\'SO" HOI' ! O,..s'1O \( 11.1" S 1O.J1'22 w 12,'" S \6.21'SI, W $4.21' ! ".sa.".. '1.11' ! 2)'S',0' W IU3' ! 01"")2 W )1.2&' S 21.S&," W 31,1" S 00'3"" W '~U' I 2"20'10" 'U" S )1.0"'0 .. 32,'" I ".)1'H .. 20,1$' " 00.".)1 C S".01' I "'11'1) C 12 S,S 2' 0 SO 100 ISO ~ I . SCx.C .. rccr NOT A I\ECOI\O 01" SUI\VEY 1'01\ INI'ORMA TION ONL. Y ¡e~ ." """ 19M ~D ,~,jT"""'." ,.,_.- -.... "'.' '. '. '-"."., ":' /o' ~'-:/:.;.~~:::~i~E'f:.1;\i':~~~i:f:H>~ "". . ;.-., . ~1 ~i!~' ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION WETLAND AND SETBACK STRANICK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9069 That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Corrunencing at the northwest corner of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence south 89° 13 '33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 261.26 feet; . thence south 00°14'39" west a distance of 30_00 feet t9 the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00°14'39" west a distance of 546_02 feet; thence south 89°n']3" east a distance of 399.45 feet; thence north 00°14'39" east a distance of 546.02 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89°13'33" west along said south right of way margin a distance of 399.44 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 5.007 acres. fwld9069.wp5 Pg. 8 of 9 EXHIBIT uII" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 Pg. 9 of 9 EXHIBIT "II" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1, -~ .. It ....... M' ¡¡;¡¡¡j¡"O EXHIBIT E TO CONCOM[T ANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT JUNE 12, 2003 PARKING LETTER 20 (253) 661-4000 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 June 12{ 2003 Gil Hulsmann Abbey Road Group{ LLC PO Box 207 Puyallup{ WA 98371 FilE COpy RE: Christian Faith Center (City File No. 02-102271-UP) Your request dated 5/8/03 concerning drive aisle width and vehicle overhang Dear Mr. Hulsmann: City staff have reviewed the above referenced request with the following responses. Drive aisle width The Director of COmmunity Development Services will allow the requested 24-foot drive aisle width in place of the city's typical width of 25 feet{ but only at locations where the adjacent stall dimensions are 9 feet by 18 feet, irrespective of overhangs. Drive aisles serving compact-sized stalls or reduced-length stalls resulting from oVedLIII( allowances must have a 25-foot width. Per city standards, up to 25% of the total stalls on the site may be desíqnated as compact{ with a stall dimension of 8 feet by 15 feet (served by a 25 foot drive aisle). The City will allow the requested 24-foot drive aisles, as described above, on a "demonstration" basis and in the interest of reducing pervious surface and increasing landscaping along with other low impact development techniques the City has recommended and the applicant is considering for the project. It should also be noted that this decision is consistent with the three example codes you submitted, where a 24-foot drive aisle is permitted when adjacent stall dimensions are 9 feet by 18 feet or greater. It is also consistent with parking standards contained in the 1990 handbook of the American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Vehicle overhang The requested vehicle overhang into landscaping is already permitted by code and requires no modification. However, per code{ wherever a parking stall will be reduced in length by vehicle overhang into landscaping, the required width of the landscaping must be maintained. In addition, any overhang into a sidewalk area must maintain a 5-foot unobstructed sidewalk width. Therefore, the width of landscape areas and sidewalks shall be increased accordingly where necessary to meet this standard. For example, a 2-foot overhang into a required 10-foot landscape strip would require the landscape strip to be increased to a width of 12 feet. Ukewise{ a 2-foot overtlang into a 5-foot sidewalk would require the sidewalk to be increased to a width of 7 feet. Full-sized stalls against required landscaping or a sidewalk must incorporate wheel stops to prevent overhang. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns on these topics. Sincerely, Lori Michaelson, AICP Senior Planner C: Kathy McOung, Oirecto< of Community Oevdopment Services Cacy Roe. Oiæcto< of Public Worl<s Keo Miller, Deputy OirectOf of Public Worl<s Greg r-ins, Deputy OirectOf of Community Development Setviœs Jim !'emling, Development Setvices Marnqer Doc. 1.0. 23481 EXHIBIT F TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 2l EXHIBIT F-1 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCEPTUAL SANCTUARY BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN rT I I 1 L r-----, L. . J : EI3 : I EI3 I I EEl I I. .1 Abbey Road AS OF: MAY 10,2004 EXHIBIT F-2 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCEPTUAL SANCTUARY BUILDING SECOND FLOOR PLAN COLLEGE Abbey Road AS OF: MAY 10, 2004 OFFICES I I I I ,.-J I I I I I I I EXHIBIT F~3 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCEPTUAL SCHOOL BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN r----------l L I I I ;-i L -/1 I I -, r--i r-~. ¡ ¡ ¡ ~- I L I I FUTURE I - -, I CLASS I ¡ r - -/ ROOMS r----J I / I L I L - -LJ:[J Abbey Road AS OF: MAY 10,2004 L___-r----- r;- I I I - I I ,- I , ~ AS OF: MAY 10,2004 EXHIBIT F-4 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCEPTUAL SCHOOL BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN '\ / ^ I I I I I I ,--.1 I I I I I 1==0 I ~=O L: - - - --r-.- - -- G-l G-2 G-3 G-4 G-5 G-6 G-7 G-8 EXHIBIT G TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SECTION 9.4 TRAFFIC PLANS 18th Ave S S 344th from 16th to 18th 34th/16th SR 99/S 344th 336th from Hwy 99 to 20th 336th from 20th to I-5 20th A ve/336th 20th Avenue S traffic calming EXHlliIT G-l TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 18TH AVENUE SOUTH IMPROVEMENTS 6' 4' 8' 12' (j) lJ Parking Q.. Q <D ::J :t:. -<- (I) Q .., ^ WEST 12' 8' 4' 6' Parking \J (/) CJ Q ::! m -.- < <D .., Q ^ 40' 60' NOTE: UTILITIES WILL REMAIN ABOVE GROUND. SECTION R N.T.S. AS OF: MAY 10.2004 EAST Abbey Road EXHIBIT G-2 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SOUTH 344 TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS 16TH AVENUE SOUTH TO 18TH PLACE SOUTH 6' 4' 8' (/) \J Parking - 0... 0 <D ::J ~ -+- <II 0 ., - ^ 30' NORTH 1 2' 40' ~I NOTE: NORTH IMPROVEMENTS TIE INTO EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF 16TH AVE. S. AND S. 344TH S1- INTERSECTION. UTILITIES TO REMAIN ABOVE GROUND. AS OF: MAY 10,2004 SECTION R N.T.S. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER " 1 2' 8' Parking SOUTH b~~ EXHffiIT G-3 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 16TH AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 344 TH STREET INTERSECTION .J I i JD__J1 t: I I I ----+----- I \ . if) LL.J >- <C - - -"" ---- ------ SOUTH 344TH STREET !iQIT: INTERSECTION TO BE SIGNALIZED AS OF: MAY 10, 2004 b~ ~-- / -~7 I I / / / II NOTE: / INTERSECTION TO BE SIGNALIZED EXHIBIT G-4 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SOUTH 344 TH STREET AND HWY. 99 INTERSECTION L _.._-~-- --- LJ Abbey Road AS OF: MAY 10,2004 EXHIBIT G-5 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SOUTH 336TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. HWY. 99 TO 20TH AVENUE SOUTH 1 2' 1 2' 12' Asphalt Shoulder 36' 1- NORTH 6' 8' 3' Planter Sidewalk Uti!. Strip 35' SOUTH NOTE: PLANTER AND UTIUTY STRIP MAYBE MODIFIED AT WEST HYlEBOS CULVERT CROSSING(S) TO PROTECT WETLAND AND WETLAND BUFFER. SECTION M AS OF: MAY 10.2004 N.T.S. ~~ EXHffiIT G-6 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SOUTH 336TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS 20TH AVENUE SOUTH INTERST A TE-5 5' 1 1 ' 1 2' 1 l' 5' 6' 3' OJ OJ \J Util. ^ ^ Q (þ 39' (þ ::J -+- (þ ., ¡~ 39' NORTH SOUTH NOTE: PLANTER. SIDEWALK, STREET TREES AND UTILITIES STRIP STOPS SO' WEST OF EAST HYlEBOS BRANGH CULVERT(S) TO PROTECT WETlAND AND WETlAND BUFFER SECTION K N.T.S. Abbey Road AS OF: MAY 10,2004 EXHIBIT G- 7 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT , 20TH AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 336TH STREET INTERSECTION j : \ I \ ! I \ I : / } Y \ ¡"" / / \ \ --;. ./ \/\\ ---/---,/--~ L "- ----~---~~~./ /~--\-~ --< ./ \ \ .::::--=- - ~- - J - L - -'-<- - ........ - "- ~ --~ --~ "- --~-- --~........ '..--=-::::- " ~ x...-- \ ././ ........ --..... EXTEND PROPOSED SIDEWALK - -- -.0 TO EXISTING SIDEWALK ~.. o~ 0 -...... c --10] ;;U »0 m J/-n Q - ;;u en c - '-'6 ~ ~ ;0 G) - 4. m o o 01 q ~~ 0 c ;U m EXTEND PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO EXISTING SIDEWALK ~- =-->r-'-=---". ~ .. ' -.. ¡i., J r -~ .. ,~, " -..,--,:._,,--, '" ' <! -.~ , .-'----"'--,--- '--'.4. - - -----. NOTE: INTERSECTION TO BE SIGNALIZED AS OF: MAY 10,2004 Abbey Road EXHIBIT G-8 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND D EVELO PMENT AGREEMENT TRAFFIC CALMING PLANTER ISLAND DETAIL EXTRUDED CURB 1-- --1~ .?O.. ~ fT1 i'/, ~x --,- - --e;;L -~ -~ - -- -; - =cz C) AS OF: MAY 10,2004 EXISjrlNG WIDTH I I I I I I I I ~ PLANTER ISLAND SIZE TO BE DETERMINED ~ IA -~L ------tQg - :::>- t >< -=- LLJ 1_10...1 TYP. --- I I I I I , EX!cjTING WI~TH . , »- AbbeyRoad EXHIBIT H TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PROCESS IV HEARING EXAMINER DECISION 23 CITY HALL 33530 1 st Way South PO Box 9718 (253) 661-4000 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 April 23, 2004 i~-- ì Irì-\ i~ ,r¡-'ù ;-ç fï(\;7 :ê F:-- ( I U J ~ C> \\!J l~ !J 'èJ Lç; II-",: I, " -------..: , . "iì"\') I ~,!It I: .. I ¡ f ' . I ~U li! APR 23 2004 Ii)/ L- J~J!'--¡ r'j~I' r',c-~------.j V,)'v/ç;r,SU"lrø C/I,! of F,,-jerai\~"y Gil Hulsmann Abbey Road Group, LLC PO Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98372 RE: PROCESS IV REQUEST ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA INTRUSIONS CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, FWHE# 04-03, FW# 02-1-2271-00-UP Dear Appellant: Enclosed please find the Report and Decision of the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner relating to the above-entided case. Very truly yours, , P'E"','AUSSEW' HEARING EXAMINER SKC/kib cc: All parties of record City of Federal Way {!«~( IA - C!h ~J(~,~ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY rF-:\--¡:; --;¡~---:-;;---- '., l!r!ILb~i,CJ.r71;!) I ! J I r~ U \ I ' , I II,,-)\! -'~-, :) I ¡! II! ; I I u UL~;.:{. 2."..3,.~~J ',! '~'" ,'~"'~J,j"'ce ! ----~i'J"13i'\'j\' I -----~--j Page - 1 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER IN THE MATTER OF: PROCESS IV REQUEST ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA INTRUSIONS FWHE# 04-03 FW# 02-1-2271-00-UP CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION The applicant is requesting to: 1) fill a "Category III" wetland and its \)1 ¡Fer' 2) mitigate for the filled wetland and buffer by creating wetland and additional buffer drea in and adjacent to a "Category II" wetland on the site; 3) displace a portior; d a wetland/stream buffer to accommodate an access road; and 4) intrude into wetlawi ,;uifers for street improvements, including pavemernwidening, retaining wall, and extending storm pipes and stream culverts. II. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Hearing Date: Decision Date: April 20, 2004 April 23, 2004 At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence: 1. 2. 3. 4. Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way, Gil Hulsman, 923 Shaw Road, Suite A. Puyallup, WA 98372 Garet Monger, 518 N. 59th, Seattle, WA 98103 Marie Adair, 28811 -19th Ave. S., Federal Way. WA 98003 At the hearing the following exhibits were admitted as part of the official record of these proceedings: 1. 1-E. 1-F. Staff Report with all attachments Addendum to Environmental Impact Statement (1 E) (4/16/04) Letters from Public (Beginning w/Oerek Oexheimen) (iF) (4/16/04) Page - 2 2. 3. 4. 5. Power Point Presentation (Hard Copy) - Process IV Public Hearing Christian Faith Centers - Wetland Areas Chart Statement from Virginia Marquart Marie Adair Statement III. FINDINGS 1. The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into the record, and taken this matter under advisement. 2. The Community Development Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable policies and provisions in this matter and is hereby marked as Exhibit "1" and incorporated iry its entirety by this reference. 3. All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). 4. The applicant has a possessory ownermip interest in a generally rectangular, 46.58- acre parcel of unimproved, mostly forèsted property located east of Pacific Highway South and west of Interstate 5 between South 3361h Street and South 34151 Place within the City of Federal Way. The applicant has submitted requests for approval of a comprehensive plan amendment, zone reclassification, development agreement, and development plan which, if approved, would allow development of the site into a 218,500 square-foot church, 104,480 square-foot private school, and associated parking, playfields, and landscaping. The decision to approve or deny the above requests is within the jurisdiction of the Federal Way City Council which will hold a public hearing prior to making such determination. 5. To construct the project as proposed, the applicant must also obtain Process IV approval to allow the applicant to fill a wetland and intrude into wetland/stream buffers. Specifically, the applicant requests authority to fill a Category III wetland and its buffer; create additional wetlands and buffers in and adjacent to an on-site Category \I wetland; displace a portion of a wetland/stream buffer to accommodate an access road; and potentially intrude into wetland buffers to make street improvements which could include pavement widening, a retaining wall, and the extension of storm pipes and stream culverts. 6. A north/south trending ridge divides the parcel into two drainage subbasins within the Hylebos Creek Basin. A tributary to the west branch of Hylebos Creek flows 9. Page - 3 from north to south across the west side of the property, and a tributary to the east branch of Hylebos Creek flows across the east side of the parcel from north to south. The Federal Way City Code (FWCC) defines both tributaries as major streams. 7. Three wetlands exist on the site. Wetland "A" measures approximately 4.5 acres, 14,000 square feet of which are located on the site. Wetland "A" is associated with the Hylebos tributary and also serves as an operating, regional storm drainage detention facility known as "Kitts Corner Pond", designed and maintained by the City. Pursuant to a 1996 Settlement Agreement between the City and a prevIous property owner, the applicant will discharge stormwater runoff from the we~tl:'rn portion of the site into the Kitts Corner Pond (Wetland "A"). However, the primary wetland hydrology is provided by the tributary which flows into Wetland "A" through an 18-inch diameter storm pipe and a pair of 42-inch diameter stream culverts beneath South 336111 Street. 8. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the City has provided a permanent buffer width of 100 feet around Wetland "A" with the exception of the northern portion of the boundary adjacent to South <J36th Street which ranges in width from approximately 40 feet to 50 feet The proposed site plan shows an access extending east into the site from Pacific Highway South through the southern portion of the wetland buffer as anticipated by the Settlement Agreement which requires City staff to support such an extension. However, the agreement requires Process IV review -and hearing exàminer approval. Thus, development of the project will not impact Wetland "A", but will impact the buffer along the south portion of the wetland and could impact a portion of the buffer along the north portion of the wetland. As previously found, a Hylebos Creek tributary flows into the wetland from beneath South 336th Street, exits the site through an adjustable gate spillway in the southwest corner of the pond, and then flows into a storm pipe which passes beneath Pacific Highway South. The tributary has no defined stream channel within Wetland "A" and dries up during the late summer. 10. Wetland "C" consists of a 3,762 square-foot Category III Palustrine scrub-shrub wetland located near the center of the parcel at the proposed location of the school auditorium/sanctuary building. The applicant proposes to fill both the wetland and its required 25-foot wide buffer. Wetland "C" has no hydrological connection to any other water body as its hydrology is provided by a high ground water table. The Page - 4 11. 12. 13. wetland has low habitat value due to its size, lack of plant diversity, isolation, and lack of open water during the summer months. Wetland "B", located along the eastern property line, consists of a linear, riparian . wetland that is associated with and straddles the eastern Hylebos Creek tributary. The wetland meets the definition of a Category 1/ Palustrine Forested wetland which requires a 1 OO-foot wide buffer. The Hylebos tributary provides hydrology for the wetland as it flows into said wetland through two culverts beneath South 336th Street. Sewer line construction previously disturbed the wetland and buffer. The site plan shows the wetland surrounded by a 1 OO-foot wide buffer with the exception of the north portion adjacent to South 336th Street. To build the project as proposed and make a reasonable use of the property, the applicant must fill Wetland "C" and its buffer. To mitigate therefor, the applicant proposes to intrude into Wetland "B", its buffer, and the tributary buffer to Cleate 5,200 square feet of Category 1/ wetland which will include grading. The applicant must also displace 16,305 square feet of Wetland "A" buffer to facilitate construction of the access road from Pacific High'vYay Söuth. To mitigate for the displacement, the applicant proposes to create 20,083 square feet of wetland buffer along the eastern border of the existing buffer. The applicant may need to displace an unknown amount of buffers for both Wetlands "A" and "8" adjacent to South 336th Street. The exact area of displacement (if any) will not be known until the City Council makes its determination regarding approval of the project and road improvements. Maximum displacement will include 11,690 square feet of Wetland "A" buffer and 6,794 square feet of Wetland '~B".buffer. To mitigate, the applicant will add 21,480 square feet of wetland buffer to the northeast buffer of Wetland "A" and 17,165 square feet of buffer along the western buffer of Wetland "B" (See Exhibit 3). Section 22-1358 FWCC sets forth the criteria an applicant must meet prior to constructing improvements and making land surface modifications within regulated wetlands. Section 22-1359 FWCC sets forth criteria for constructing improvements and land surface modifications within regulated wetland buffers. The first five criteria set forth in each section are identical, but modifications within wetlands have four additional criteria. As previously found, the applicant must fill Wetland "C" and its buffer. Prior to obtaining approvaUo do so, the applicant must establish that the request satisfies all criteria set forth in Sections 22-1358(d) and 22-1359(f) FWCC. Findings on each criteria are hereby made as follows: Page - 5 A. c. Filling the wetland will not adversely affect water quality. The wetland has no hydrologic connection with other wetlands or stream corridors. A code- required final erosion and sedimentation control plan will address arlvorse water quality impacts related to grading and filling activities. The i,y¡!..;d wetland and buffer along the eastern tributary will provide much ~I\jdter functions relating to water quality, hydrology, and wildlife habitat than currently provided by Wetland "C". 8. Filling the wetland and buffer will not adv.ersely affect the quality of wildlife habitat. Wetland "c" has low habitat value due to its small size, hVi ¡ > :, \1 ic isolation, lack of plant diversity, and lack of open water during the Sl I H:;I The compensatory mitigation areas along Wetland "8" will provide habitat values equal to or greater than retention of Wetland "C". No endangered or protected animals inhabit the site. Filling the wetland and buffer will not adversely affect drainage or storm water retention capabilities. The applièant will excavate the mitigation ,1IP:1 to ensure a volume of surface water detention and retention equal to Wetland "C". "" D. Filling will not lead to unstable earth conditions or create erosion hazards. Wetland "c" is not located near any geologically hazardous areas, and an erosion and sedimentation control plan which the City must approve will address erosion from filling and grading. E. Filling the wetland will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area nor to the City as a whole. As previously found, the applicant will create 5,200 square feet of wetland as compared to the 3,762 square feet filled. F. As previously found, the filling of Wetland "c" will result in no net loss of wetland area, function, or value. G. The project is in the best interest of the public health, safety, or welfare. As previously found, creating additional wetland and buffer within the valuable stream/wetland area along the east property line results in greater resource protection and will allow more efficient use of land. H. The applicant has demonstrated sufficient scientific expertise and Page - 6 15. supervisory capability to carry out the project. The applicant's wetland biologist is a recognized expert with over 10 years experience in designing wetland mitigation plans. L The applicant is committed to monitoring the project and making corrections if the project fails to meet projected goals. The applicant has provided a mitigation and monitoring plan for a five-year period and has also designed the storm drainage system to allow further discharge into the wetlands to restore hydrology if such is necessary. J. The City has approved the applicant's conceptual mitigation plan, and the replacement and enhancement wetland and buffer ratios satisfy the criteria set forth in Section 22 -1358( e)(3) FWCC. Prior to obtaining approval to intrude into Wetland "B" and its buffer and the Stream "B" buffer to provide compensatory wetland and buffer for filling Wetland "C" and its buffer, the applicant must also establish that the request satisfies the criteria set forth in Sections 22-1358 and 22-135~ EWCC. Findings on each criteria are hereby made as follows: A. Intrusion to create additional wetlands will not adversely affect water quality. The created wetland area will have a greater diversity of wetland plants than Wetland "C", and such plants will provide water quality by removing nutrients and toxins by filtration and uptake in plant tissue. Mitigation and monitoring will ensure no adverse impacts to water quality. B. The intrusion will not adversely affect the existing quality of the wetland's or buffers wildlife habitat. Habitat potential in the mitigation area of Wetland "B" is greater than the wetland and buffer of Wetland "C". The enhanced native scrub-shrub plant community and native forest habitat will increase the vegetation and plant diversity thereby improving near stream habitat opportunities. c. The intrusion will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities. The applicant has designed the created wetland to replicate the stormwater retention capacity of Wetland "C". The applicant will excavate the toe of an existing slope and create a volume of surface water detention and retention comparable to or greater than the filled wetland. Creek flood waters, as well as stormwater runoff, will provide a source of hydrology to the Page - 7 16. new wetland. Project stormwater is infiltrated into the ground will move down slope through the wetland buffer into the created wetland. D. The intrusion will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards. The creation area consists of a relatively level flood plain adjacent to the Hylebos tributary. Excavation depth will range from one to three feet, and water velocities, even during winter flooding periods, are relatively slow. The dredging will create no steep slopes or other topography subject to erosion. Extensive revegetation will bind the soil and control erosion. E. The intrusion will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area nor to the City as a whole. The project will not affect off-site properties or public or private open space areas. F. As previously found, the intrusion will result in no net loss of wetland area, function, or value. The applicant is creating more wetland than it is filling in accordance with the requirements of the FWCC. The applicant is also establishing substantially more wetland buffer than destroyed. <' .,.... G. The project is in the best interest of the public health, safety, or welfare. As previously found, trading a small, isolated wetland for an expanded, connected, wetland system results in greater resource protection and more efficient use of land. . H. As previously found, the applicant has demonstrated sufficient scientific expertise and supervisory capability tö fulfill the project. Prior to eliminating a portion of Wetland "A"'s south buffer to allow construction of the access road from Pacific Highway South, the applicant must establish that the request satisfies the criteria set forth in Section 22-1359(f) FWCC, addressing wetland buffers, and Section 22-1312(c) FWCC, addressing intrusion into setbacks for streams. Said Sections set forth the same criteria, but Section 22-1312 FWCC has one additional criteria. Findings on each criteria are hereby made as follows: A. Locating the access road within the Wetland "A" buffer will not adversely affect water quality. As previously found, Wetland "A", located mostly west and northwest of the site, is known as the "Kitts Corner Pond" and provides a regional storm drainage facility. The applicant's conceptual storm drainage plan (Exhibit L) shows surface water collected from the proposed access Page - 8 17. \ ; ! road and directed into a storm water treatment system to the south of said road. The water then discharges into Wetland "A" following cleansing. B. Construction of the road in the buffer will not adversely affect the existing quality of the wetland's or buffer's wildlife habitat. The buffers on the west and south sides of Wetland "A" are presently in poor condition and consist of earthen berms, gravel roadways, and sparse vegetation. However, the eastern buffer consists of forest and is therefore in good condition. The applicant proposes to remove 16,305 square feet of a previously disturbed buffer area and replace it with property adjacent to the high quality, forested buffer on the east side of the wetland. The access road is proposed within an existing access easement and was recognized in the Settlement Agreement. C. Construction of the road will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities. Construction in accordance with a final storm drainage grading and erosion control plan will assure no adverse impacts to the drainage or stormwater retention cápabìlities of the buffer. D. Construction will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion !1azards. The road area contains no geologically hazardous areas, and construction in accordance with approved plans will ensure that no unstable earth conditions or erosion hazards develop. E. Construction will npt be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the City as a whole, including loss of open space. Replacement of a disturbed buffer with forested property will benefit the City and properties in the area. The additional buffer will preseNe and protect sensitive areas from future land modifications and encroachments by people and animals. F. Section 22-1312(c)(6) requires the applicant to show that the intrusion is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property. The road will provide access to the site in accordance with an existing easement recognized by the Settlement Agreement To build the project, the applicant must have an access onto Pacific Highway South. Therefore, the applicant cannot proceed with reasonable development without the road. As previously found, depending on the City Council's requirements for street Page - 9 improvements on South 336th Street, the applicant may need to intrude into those portions of the buffers of both Wetlands "A" and "B" located within the right-of-way of said road. If the City Council requires full street improvements within the wetland . buffer areas, the applicant will need to disturb 11,690 square feet of Wetland "A" buffer and 6,794 square feet of Wetland "B" buffer. The applicant proposes to create 21,480 square feet of buffer for Wetland "A" and 17,165 square feet of buffer for Wetland "B". Thus, the applicant will replace 18,484 square feet of low quality wetland buffer with 38,645 square feet of high quality buffer. Prior to intruding into said wetland buffers to make street improvements, the applicant must establish that the requests satisfies the criteria set forth in Sections 22-1312 and 22-1359 FWCC The request satisfies said criteria as the applicant must construct improverncnls to include pavement widening, retaining walls, and extension of storm drainage pipes. The existing location and configuration ot South 336th Street plus the required street improvements dictate the street and storm drainage system design for the 'Herall project. All improvements will occur within the right-ot-way, and the retaining \Nalls will limit buffer displacement. Both buffers along South 336th Street have been previously disturbed by construction ot existing street and drainage improvements but have revegetated over time. As previously noted, a sewer line was constructed within Wetland "B". The wetland buffers within the right-or-way provide no significant habitat value, but must be invaded to provide-access to the site. The applicant has also demonstrated that the stream cannot cross beneath South 336th Street in an open condition, and extending the culvert by three feet will have little, discernable effect on stream function or habitat. The existing culvert meets the 100- year storm design standard as will the extensions. The culvert design does not preclude fish passage, although fish do not inhabit either tributary, and are not located immediately down stream. 18. In summary, Wetland "A" will not be disturbed, but will have its buffer area expanded from the present 192,327 square feet to a possible 205,895 square feet, and will also have 3,598 square feet of wetland enhancement. Wetland "C" will be filled and eliminated. Wetland "B" will increase in size by 5,200 square feet and will have its buffer area increased from the present 193,085 square feet to 220,089 square feet. Overall, wetland size will increase from the present 242,971 square feet to 244,410 square feet. Wetland buffers will increase from the present 393,838 square feet to 425,985 square feet (Exhibit 3). Therefore, development of the site as proposed will result in no net loss in wetlands and/or wetland buffers. 19. Prior to obtaining Process IV review approval, the applicant must establish that the request satisfies the criteria set forth in Section 22-445(c) FWCC. Findings on each ./ Page - 10 20. criteria are hereby made as follows: A. All requests are consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Applicable goals and policies set forth in the Plan include Policy CA4 which approves a tradeoff of small, isolated wetlands in exchange for a larger, connected wetland system which can achieve greater resource protection and reduce isolation and fragmentation of habJtat. The applicant proposes a development which eliminates a "small, isolated wetland" in exchanÇJe for increasing the size of a more valuable, larger, connected wetland sv<;k~rn. Policy NEG7 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the protectl(1:1 ,nd enhancement of the functions and values of the City's wetlands, anu the applicant's mitigation plans do so. As previously found, the project meets the City's objective of no overall net loss of wetland functions or va" les in accordance with Policy NEP43. The mitigation site complies with. )(¡Ilcy NEP50 as it contributes to an existing wetland system and increases buffers for existing wetlands. B. The project is consistent will al~applícable provisions and laws of the FWCC assuming compliance with conditions of approval and City Council approval for the overall development. C. The project is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. o. The City Council will determine whether the streets and utilities in the area are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal. The wetland mitigation does not generate demand on streets and utilities. Approval of the Process IV request will authorize street frontage improvements within the South 336th Street right-of-way and construction of an access road from Pacific Highway South, E. The City Council will determine whether the proposed accesses to the parcel are at their optimal locatìon and configuration. Again, the Process IV approval authorizes street improvements and construction as set forth above. The City included a number of comment letters which raised generalized objectIons regarding the filling of wetlands and intrusion into wetland buffers. However, none of the letters offered expert testimony contradicting the applicant's expert ;;tl ì' lies and the City's review thereof. The Washington Court of Appeals addressed such Page - 11 comments in Maranantha Mininq v. Pierce County, 59 Wash.App. 795 (1990); The only opposing evidence was generalized complaints from displeased citizens. Community displeasure cannot be the basis of a permit denial. 59 Wash.App. 795, at 804. IV. CONCLUSIONS From the foregoing findings the Hearing Examiner makes the following conclusions: 2. 3. 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented by this request. The applicant has established that the request to fill a Category III wetlc)ildmd buffer, mitigate for such activities by providing additional wetlands and.' 1I;;IS, displacing a wetland/stream buffer to accommodate an access road, and intrude into wetland buffers to construct street improvements is consistent with app!ic;:¡hle criteria set forth in Sections 22-1358, 22- ~ 359, and 22-1312 FWCC. The fJfOJcct also complies with applicable goals ane! policies of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The project satisfies all criteria set forth in Section 22-445(c) FWCC for Process IV approval. Therefore, Process IV approval should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. As required by the Director of Community Development Services, prior to occupancy of any buildings on the site, the applicant shall set aside the wetlands and buffers approved by this decision as Native Growth Protection Tracts (NGPT's). The boundaries of the areas shall be surveyed and shall reflect the expanded buffers shown in a final approved Mitigation and Monitoring Plan, prepared in accordance with Condition #7 below; anCJ stlall be in addition to the buffer area for the east side of Wetland "/\" as delineated the 1 996 Settlement Agreement between the City of Federal Way and the Federal Way Industrial Park. The applicant shall submit the draft documents for the City's review and authorization and the documents shall be recorded as directed by the City. As required by the Directors of Community Development Services Department and Public Works Department, prior to issuance of any Page - 12 construction permits, the applicant shall field-flag all identified wetland buffer boundaries in accordance with a final approved Mitigation Plan, prepared in accordance with Condition #7 below; and consistent with the recorded Native Growth Protection Tracts as required by Condition #1 above; and the buffer boundaries shall be reflected on all applicable construction drawings and permits. . 3. As required by the Director of Community Development Services, prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for the City's review and approve a plan to provide signage on the site, identifying environmentally sensitive areas and prohibiting human and pet access into such areas. The plan shall include the number, location, and design details, including text, for the proposed signs. 4. Any use of the recreational field adjacent to Wetland "8" for competitive athletic games, such as baseball or soccer, as may be approved by the Director of Community Development Services, must provide fencing adjacent to the sports field along the west Wetland "8" buffer boundary, delineated pursuant to Condition #1 apove. Prior to initiation of any such activities, the applicant shall establish the fencing pursuant to the City's review and approval of a fencing plan and design details as pro"ided by the applicant, and such fencing shall be designed to allow for the passage of small animals. 5. As required by the Director of Community Development Services pursuant to FWCC § 22-1358(1)(g) and § 22-1358(3)(4), prior to issuance of construction permits related to any work approved with this application, the applicant shall: (a) provide a cost estimate that covers the complete costs for plant materials, installation, and maintenance. including contingencies, pursuant to the final approved Mitigation Plan; (b) provide a performance and maintenance bond to the City in the amount of 120 percent of the cost estimate; and (c) pay for the services of a qualified professional selected and retained by the City to review monitoring reports, conduct inspections, and make recommendations to the City during monitoring period. Following successful installation of the wetland mitigation work pursuant to the final approved Plan and initial inspection, the performance portion of the bond shall be released and the five-year maintenance portion of the bond shall apply during the five years of monitoring. Page - 13 6. As required by the Director of Public Works, grading and clearing activities in the Wetland "8" mitigation area (excluding installation of planting and an irrigation system) shall be prohibited between October 1st and April 30th. 7. Prior to issuance of any construction pennits, the applicant shall submit a final Mitigation and Monitoring Plan, for the City's -review and approval, that addresses all outstanding requirements as identified in the April 8, 2004, memorandum from Sheldon and Associates, Inc. 8. The Process IV approval does not take effect unless or until the City Council approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone, Development Agreement, and Development Plan, as separately requested by the applicant. DECISION: The request for Process IV approval to allow the filling of Wetland "C", the mitigation for the filled wetland and buffer by the creation of wetland and additional buffer area in an and adjacent to Wetland "8"; the displacemeñ£"Of a portion of a wetland/stream buffer to accommodate an access road; and the intrusion into wetland buffers for street improvements is hereby granted subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions above. ~ DATED THIS _7~ DAY OF ~ ~ TRANSMITTED THIS~3.- DAY OF J ' APPLICANT/AGENT: Gil Hulsmann Abbey Road Group, LLC PO 8ox 207 Puyallup, WA 98372 ,2004, to the following: Page - 14 QWNERCS): Christian Faith Center PO Box 9860 Seattle, WA 98198 Bob Loomis 2101 S. 324th St, SP 2058 FederalWay, WA 98003 Carl Jones 8elmor Park 2101 S 324th St, SP333 Federal Way, WA 98003 RD. Pearson 2101 S. 324th St, #303 Federal Way, WA 98003 Jack Tylare 2101 S. 324th St., #10 Federal Way, WA 98003 Barry Turnbull 33355 20 S. Federal Way, VVA 98003 Shirley Fulbraa 33357 20 S. Federal Way, VVA 98003 . "", Phyllis L. Bowman 32820 20th Ave. S., #25 Federal Way, WA 98003-9429 Tom Rolph 1860 S. 336th St. FederalVVay, WA 98003 Marie Adair 28811 19th Ave. S. Federal Way, VVA 98003 Juliet Sykes 402 S. 333fd St., Suite #100 Federal Way; VVA 98003 Dr. Patricia Mail 35214 - 28th Ave. S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Virginia Marquart 29009 22nd Ave. S. Federal Way, VVA 98003 Paul Ouellette 1918 Rolling Hills SE Renton, WA 98055 John C. Brownson 2101 S. 324th St., #117 Federal Way, WA 98003 Rik Newell 2101 S. 324th St, #137 Federal Way, VVA '98003 Robert Roper 525 SVV 312th St. FederalVVay, WA 98003 Joann Piquette Ted W. Wilson Page - 15 302 S. 29Sth PI. FederalVVay, VVA 98003 824 S. Marine Hills VVay FederalVVay, VVA 98003 Margaret Nelson 32904 4th Ave. SVV FederalVVay, VVA 98023 John Kanto 1824 S. 344th St. FederalVVay, VVA 98003 City of Federal VVay c/o Chris Green P.O. Box 9718 Federal VVay, VVA 98063-9718 PROCESS IV Rights tò Appeal Decisions of the hearing Examiner may be appealed by any person who is to receive a copy of that decision under FVVCC Section 22-443. The appeal, in the form of a letter of appeal, must be delivered to the Department of Community Development Services within fourteen (14) calendar days after the issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision. The letter of a'ppeal must contain: 2. A statement identifying the decision being appealed, along with a copy of the decision; 3. A statement of the alleged errors in the Hearing Examiner's decision, including specific factual finds and conclusions of the Hearing Examiner disputed by the person filing the appeal; and 4. The appellant's name, address, telephone number and fax number, and any other information to facilitate communications with the appellant. The person filing the appeal shall include, with the letter of appeal, the fee established by the City of the costs of preparing a written transcript of the hearing (or in the Page - 16 alternative, the appellant may prepare the transcript at his or her sole costs from tapes of the hearing provided by the City).The appeal will not be accepted unless it is accompanied by the required fee and cost (or agreement of the appellant to prepare the transcript). Appeals from the decision of the Hearing Examiner will be heard by The City Council. The decision of City Council is the final decision of the City. The action of the City in granHng or denying an application under this article may be reviewed pursuant to RCW 36.70C in the King County Superior Court. The land Use Petition must be filed within twenty-one (21) calendar days after the final land use decision of the City. . . EXHIBIT D STATEMENT OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The applicant has a possessory ownership interest in a generally rectangular parcel of unimproved property located east of Pacific Highway South and west of Interstate 5 (I-5) between South 336th Street and South 34151 Place within the City of Federal Way. 2. The subject site currently has a comprehensive plan and zoning designation of Business Park (BP) and the land is presently vacant. Existing zoning and land uses of the surrounding properties in the vicinity include single and multiple family to the north; a mix of residential, commercial, and industrial to the south; commercial to the west, and Interstate 5 and commercial to the east. 3. The applicant has submitted requests for approval of a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone, with an associated development agreement and development plan to allow development of the site into a 218,500 square-foot church, 101,526 square-foot private school, and associated parking, playfields, and accessory uses. 4. The requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone is subject to a City Council decision pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article IX, "Process VI Review;" and the requested Development Agreement and Development Plan is subject to City Council decision pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article IX, "Process VI Review," and FWCC Chapter 22, Article XXI, "Development Agreements." The decision to approve or deny the requests is within the jurisdiction of the Federal Way City Council. 5. The City Council held a Public Hearing May 24,2004 and June 15,2004, took testimony, admitted evidence into the record, and considered the matter fully. 6. All appropriate procedures were followed in accordance with the requirements of the FWCC and applicable law. 7. All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the FWCC and applicable law. 8. The Hearing Examiner reviewed and conditionally approved the environmentally sensitive areas requests associated with the application on April 23, 2004. The Hearing Examiner Decision sets forth general findings, applicable policies and provisions in the matter and is hereby incorporated in its entirety, without limitation, by this reference. 9. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), the City issued a Notice of Adoption of Existing Environmental Documents and Issuance of a Detennination of Nonsignificance, on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone of the site from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM-3600) on July 4, 2001. The City issued Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) for the development application on November 18, 2003, and March 3, 2004, and EIS Addenda on April 16,2004 and May 21,2004. Four public meetings were conducted during the environmental review process for the proposed project. These included an EIS Scoping Meeting on August 27,2002; Neighborhood Traffic Meeting on May 8, 2003; Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) hearing on December 12, 2003; and City Council EIS briefing on March 15, 2004. The Threshold Determination, EIS and addenda, and all environmental documents for the project, are hereby incorporated in their entirety, without limitation, by this reference. 10. The Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable policies and provisions in the matter and is hereby incorporated in its entirety, without limitation, by this reference. 11. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1660, "Purpose," development agreements associated with a comprehensive plan designation and related zoning change may be used at the City Council's discretion, where the project is larger in scope and has potentially larger impacts than normal, or where the City Council may desire to place certain restrictions on the proposal. The intent of a development agreement is not to waive requirements normally associated with a proposed use. A "Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement", herein called "The Agreement" or "The Development Agreement," has been prepared for the project in order to fully address and mitigate identified impacts associated with the project. The Concomitant Agreement allows for a rezone of the property subject to conditions governing the use of the property. Under the Concomitant Agreement, the allowable use of the property shall be limited to a church, a school, and accessory uses. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1662, "Content," the Agreement sets forth the development standards and other provisions that apply to and govern and vest the development, use, and mitigation of the development of the real property for the duration specified in the Agreement, consistent with the applicable City of Federal Way development regulations. The Agreement is accompanied by a Development Plan (Exhibit B to the Agreement) as required by FWCC Section 22-1669, and has been prepared in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1664, "Preparation of Development Agreement" 12. Mitigation measures established in the Agreement are based on the FWCC and adopted regulations, policies and procedures; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP); the EIS prepared for the project, including the key development and operational assumptions underlying the EIS analysis; and the City's police power authority. 13. Mitigation measures established in the Agreement are proportional to direct, identified impacts of the development and are supported by substantial evidence. 14. The proposed principal uses of the site as a church and school, are allowed uses in the proposed Multifamily Residential (RM) zoning districts, pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-671 and 22-674, subject to all applicable development regulations and standards. Use and development of the site consistent with the FWCC and the Development Agreement will help ensure compatibility of the use with surrounding areas. 15. The project will provide a "front yard" setback from South 336th Street of a minimum 50 feet; with "side" and "rear" yards of 30 feet for the church building; and 50 feet for the school building, ball fields and any playground equipment This provides an additional 20 feet more of front yard setback from South 336th Street for the church building than would be required by FWCC Sections 22-671 and 22-674, which allows additional landscape screening against South 336th Street and residential zoning districts to the north of the site. In addition, pursuant to code-required parking setbacks and design guidelines, a IS-foot parking lot setback along church portion with landscape buffer will be provided along the south property line adjacent to the residential uses to the south. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-1O2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 2 16. Consistent with FWCC Sections 22-671 and 22-674, the maximum allowed height of single-story elements of the church building is 35 feet above average building elevation (ABE), with up to three additional feet allowed for articulated cornices, and the maximum second-story height for offices, classrooms, library, and similar uses is 40 feet above ABE. The maximum height of the school building is 40 feet above ABE, with up to three additional feet allowed for articulated cornices. The maximum height of the sanctuary portion of the church, and the gymnasium portion of the school auditorium, is 55 feet ABE. 17. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1669, "Development Plan," and FWCC Section 22-395, "Director's Decision", the site and architectural design elements of the project were approved in a March 20, 2004, Director's Design Decision, based on the analysis and findings contained in Exhibit A to the decision. Development of the site in accordance with the design decision and other conditions of project approval and required mitigation will ensure incorporation of good design principles and compatibility with surrounding areas. The design decision sets forth general findings, applicable policies, and provisions, and is hereby incorporated in its entirety, without limitation, by this reference. 18. The applicant's preliminary clearing, grading, erosion control, significant tree survey, landscape, and surface water drainage plans have been reviewed and accepted under applicable City of Federal Way adopted codes, policies, and regulations, including FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface Water Management"; FWCC Chapter 22, Article XVII, "Landscaping"; and the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City's amendments to the KCSWDM, subject to review of final construction plans prepared in accordance with all applicable codes and development standards; the EIS; Process N conditions of approval; and mitigation required under the Development Agreement. 19. Surface water detention and water quality treatment facilities will be provided for both the west and east drainage sub-basins on the site, in accordance with all applicable design and development regulations. 20. The Development Agreement establishes a number of mitigation measures that meet or exceed code requirements. This includes the oversight of a Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Supervisor; a Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan; a phased construction plan; and seasonal construction limits. Surface water mitigation in the Agreement includes design and construction of the east side stonnwater detention pond to meet Level 2 flow control standards; collection and dispersement of roof runoff from the sanctuary roof to adjacent wetland buffer areas; design and construction of surface water treatment facilities for the East and West 1 sub-catchments to include the use of Stonnwater Management filter vault systems, with compost medium, that meets or exceeds Resource Stream Protection Standards; and provision of an Integrated Pest Management Plan as described in the Department of Ecology Storm water Manual (2001), in order to control the use of fertilizers and pesticides. The Agreement also provides for denser vegetated bank cover and larger trees around surface water detention water quality treatment ponds than would otherwise be required by code. Additional vegetated cover will contribute to water quality by decreasing the temperature of surface water runoff from impervious surfaces and standing water in drainage facilities. This will help mitigate stonnwater drainage impacts from the development. 21. Perimeter landscape buffers, as specified in the Development Agreement, meet or exceed the applicable standards in FWCC Section 22-1566, "Multifamily Residential, RM." This includes 50 feet of landscaping along South 336th Street; 20 feet along other public rights-of-way and access easements; 15 feet along other property lines associated with the church; and 10 feet along other Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 3 property lines associated with the school. These provisions are consistent with the FWCC, and also provide 20 feet of additional landscaping along South 336th Street than required by code. A 50 foot vegetated landscape buffer along South 336th Street will preserve additional native trees and shrubs and preserve a cross-site vegetated corridor linking to on-site wetland and stream buffers and riparian areas along the East Branch Hylebos Creek. In addition to retaining native vegetation and providing habitat opportunity, this corridor will provide water quality functions such as rainwater interception and filtering. 22. The clearing, grading, surface water, and landscaping mitigation provided in the Development Agreement is consistent with goals and policies contained in the FWCP Natural Environment Chapter, including NEG1, NEG2, NEG3, NEG10, NEP1, NEP2, NEP7, NEP 10, NEP18, NEP21, NEP63, and NEP64. 23. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-1671, 22-1674, and 22-1378, the required amount of parking for churches and schools is determined on a case-by-case basis, pursuant to a parking demand analysis. Based on the City's review of the applicant's Traffic Management Plan (TMP), the Development Agreement specifies a minimum of 1,406 parking stalls and a maximum of 1,540 stalls on the site to serve anticipated parking demand for ordinary operation of the site. The Agreement also requires the applicant to prepare and submit an overflow parking plan for review and approval to the Public Works Director prior to special events to manage overflow parking using resources such as transit, shuttle service, and traffic control such as flaggers and police officers. The Agreement establishes the parking setbacks from property lines, consistent with FWCC Sections 22-671 and 22-674. 24. Lakehaven Utility District has provided Certificates of Water and Sewer Availability for the property, and will provide these services pursuant to developer extension agreements between the applicant and District. Fire and emergency medical services will be provided by the Federal Way Fire Department. A City-operated regional storm drainage detention pond located in the northwest portion of the site has been determined to have adequate capacity to accommodate site drainage from the westerly sub-basin on the property. 25. Staff has reviewed and analyzed transportation related matters. The Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable policies, and provisions related to the matter, and is hereby incorporated in its entirety, without limitation, by this reference. 26. The project site has frontage on the existing rights-of-way of South 336th Street, SR 99 (Pacific Highway South), South 34151 Place, and the planned extension of 20lh Avenue South, as shown in FWCP Map III-5. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1474(a), frontage improvements are required for these roadways. 27. South 336th Street is classified as a minor arterial, as shown in FWCP Map III-5. FWCP Map III-6 classifies South 336th Street as a Type K street. FWCP Map III-19 was revised to relocate the segment of a bicycle route on South 3361h Street between 13th Place South and 20th Avenue South to South 330lh Street. Therefore, a Type K street is no longer applicable to South 3361h Street west of 20th A venue South; a Type M street is now the appropriate standard. Existing improvements on the frontage consist of 36 to 54 feet of pavement with intermittent curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the north side only. Existing right-of-way width varies from 60 to 100 feet. The applicant will dedicate five feet of right-of-way on the west 400 feet of frontage only and construct the required half-street improvements on the entire frontage. Modifications approved by the Director of Public Works may be made pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1477, in order to minimize impacts to wetlands and wetland buffers. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 4 28. SR 99 (Pacific Highway South) is classified as a principal arterial, as shown in FWCP Map III-5. FWCP Map III-6 classifies SR 99 as a Type A street. SR 99 is currently under construction to provide full standard improvements, and all necessary right-of-way has been acquired. 29. Twentieth Avenue South is classified as a minor collector, as shown in FWCP Map III-5. FWCP Map III-6 classifies 20lh Avenue South as a Type R street. As a new street through the site, the applicant will dedicate all 66 feet of right-of-way and construct full street improvements. 30. South 341s1 Place is classified as a minor collector, as shown in FWCP Map III-5. FWCP Map III-6 classifies South 341 sl Place as a Type R street. Existing improvements consist of a 36- foot street with curbs and gutters, and five-foot sidewalks in a 60-foot right-of-way. The applicant will dedicate an additional three feet of right-of-way. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1477, the requirement for street frontage improvements on South 341 sl Place are waived because the improvements are already in place. 31. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1474(b), the City may require up to 300 square feet of right-of-way dedication per average daily trip generated. According to the EIS, average daily trip generation would exceed 2688 trips, thus allowing the City to require at a minimum 806,486 square feet of right-of-way dedication. Approximately 108,290 square feet of right-of-way dedication would be required to meet full standards. Thus, the right-of-way requirements are proportionate with the level of impact. 32. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1542, two-lane driveways shall be 30 feet wide, and three-lane driveways shall be 40 feet wide, unless design vehicles (the largest vehicle that would reasonably be expected to use the driveway, and therefore the one to which the driveway will be designed) require larger widths. The EIS analyzed all driveways as two-lane except for the northerly of the four driveways onto 20th Avenue South, and the driveway onto South 3361h Street, which were assumed to be three-lane driveways. 33. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1543(a), South 336th Street has an access classification of four, which allows access points with spacing of 150 feet measured centerline-to-centerline. FWCC Section 22-1543(c) limits access to one per 330 feet of frontage. South 336th Street has approximately 2150 feet of frontage, thus six access points could be allowed. The site plan for the project shows one access approximately 572 feet west of 20th Avenue South. A single-family residential driveway is located opposite this proposed driveway, the driveway to the Ridgecrest Motel is located approximately 100 feet to the west, and a driveway to a multi-family residential complex is located 230 feet to the east. The spacing standard does not apply to single-family residential uses. If the driveway were to be relocated to the east, it would worsen the intersection sight distance for traffic turning left from the driveway onto westbound South 336th Street. If the driveway were relocated to the west, it would infringe upon wetland buffer. The Ridgecrest Motel consists of eight units. Based on ITE Trip Generation, 61h edition, the motel is estimated to generate four trips the morning, evening, and Saturday peak hours, and three trips during the Sunday peak hour; therefore, although this access does not meet spacing standards, it has a low probability of creating a significant safety issue. City staff will monitor. 34. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1543(a), SR 99 has an access classification of one, which, due to its status as a state highway, must meet the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) standard of 250 feet. Left-turn in access would best be allowed at a spacing of 330 feet, and full access is pennitted only at signalized intersections. However, FWCC Section 22-1543(c) limits Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 5 access to one per 330 feet of frontage. The site has approximately 534 feet of frontage; therefore, only one access point would be pennitted. The project proposes to provide a right-inlright-out access 749 feet south of South 336th Street, which would be shared with Pacifica Plaza. This location has no other access within 250 feet. Therefore, this access meets driveway spacing standards. 35. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-l543(b), the access spacing standard for 20th Avenue South would be 150 feet. Each of the proposed driveways meets this standard. However, FWCC Section 22- l543(c) limits access to one per 330 feet of frontage. Twentieth Avenue South has 1662 feet of frontage, thus five access points could be allowed, whereas four are proposed. Therefore, this standard is met. 36. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1 543(b), the access spacing standard for South 341 st Place would be 150 feet. FWCC Section 22-1543(c) limits access to one per 330 feet of frontage. No access points are proposed onto South 341 st Place. However, the creation of the intersection of 20th A venue South and South 341 st Place creates access spacing issues with an existing driveway at the intersection of 21 st Avenue South and South 341 st Place. As part of engineering plan review, the applicant will provide plans that provide adequate intersection sight distance, geometrics, and traffic control measures that provide for safe and efficient operation of the intersection consistent with FWCC and adopted standards. 37. Pursuant to TIA Guidelines item VI.D.4.a, the City uses Highway Research Record 211 to detennine when left-turn lanes are warranted at unsignalized intersections. A left-turn lane is warranted when certain thresholds involving travel speeds, left-turn volumes, through volumes in the same direction as the subject left-turn, and opposing traffic volumes are exceeded. 38. Based on the volumes in the traffic analysis for the EIS, this warrant is met at the driveway on westbound South 336th Street during the morning, afternoon, and evening peak hours. Therefore, the applicant will provide a westbound left-turn lane at the site access on South 336th Street. 39. Based on the volumes in the traffic analysis for the EIS, left-turn lane warrants are met at the north driveway on northbound 20th Avenue South during the morning, and Sunday between service peaks; at the north central driveway on southbound 20th A venue South during the morning, afternoon, Sunday between service, and Sunday after service peaks; at the south central driveway on northbound 20th Avenue South during the morning, and Sunday between service peaks; at the south central driveway on southbound 20th A venue South during the Sunday between service peak; at the south driveway on southbound 20th Avenue South during the Sunday between service and after service peaks; and at the south driveway on northbound 20th A venue South during the Sunday between service peak. Since left-turn lanes are warranted at each driveway, the applicant will stripe 20th A venue South to provide a two-way left-turn lane throughout the site. 40. The proposed schedule of activities contained in the Traffic Management Plan (TMP), required pursuant to FWCC Section 22-671, was analyzed in the environmental review. Pursuant to FWCP Policies TP5, TP45, and TP62, the following restrictions on the scheduling of activities will be placed on the development in order to reduce traffic impacts: school classes will be completed by 3:30 pm; Sunday services will be separated by at least 90 minutes; evening services will be scheduled to start no earlier than 6:30 pm; Dominion College will have no classes scheduled between noon and 6:30 pm; and special events will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis pursuant to the TMP and should be scheduled to not add trips during peak hours of other uses, or conversely, other uses should be canceled to accommodate the special events. Should a modification of this Christian Faith Center Files CP A99-0004, 02-1 02271-00-UP, 02-1 02272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 6 schedule of activities, which was submitted for review in the EIS, be required, the Agreement specifies the applicable code process to use. 41. The intersection of SR 99 at South 31th Street would fail the adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards in 2007 with or without Christian Faith Center (CFC). This intersection was originally included in the study area based on a 10 evening peak hour trip threshold in the City's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses. As a result of the initial analysis, CFC modified their proposed hours of operation to reduce evening peak hour trip generation. As a result, the project now impacts this intersection by eight evening peak hour trips, less than the lO-trip threshold. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection. 42. Pursuant to the methodology analyzed in the EIS, the intersection of South 320lh Street and 23rd Avenue South fails the adopted LOS standard during the evening peak hour in 2007, with or without the project, and fails as a result of the project during the Sunday peak. Staff considered other methodologies for determining failure of the adopted LOS standard without violating the adopted policy. In practice, City staff has administered the policy as outlined in the TIA guidelines as the worst of two tests. Table 2 defines a volume/capacity ratio test as Xc (as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual) must be less than 1.000. However, item V.B. in the TIA Guidelines specifies that no movement shall have a volume/capacity ratio greater than 1.000. It is this latter standard upon which the EIS identified the LOS failure. Using Xc, the volume /capacity ratio is 0.91 during the 2007 evening peak hour and 0.94 during the Sunday peak hour. Given that using Xc is consistent with FWCP Policy TPI6, and the high cost to mitigate relative to the impact, no mitigation will be required at this intersection. 43. The intersection of South 3361h Street at 151 Way South would fail the LOS standards during the evening peak hour in 2007 with or without the project. The proposed mitigation would provide a protected right turn overlap phase for westbound traffic during the southbound left-turn phase. This is a minor revision to the signal design and will be incorporated into the capital project at this location, which is scheduled to be in design in 2004. No mitigation will be required at this intersection beyond pro-rata share contributions described in the Agreement. 44. The intersection of 161h A venue South at South 34151 Place would fail the LOS standard during all peak hours analyzed as a result of the project. The project would add 426 trips during the morning peak hour, 344 trips during the afternoon peak hour, 99 trips during the evening peak hour, and 820 trips during the Sunday peak hour. Because of its proximity to the signalized intersection of 161h Avenue South and SR 99, it is impractical to signalize this intersection to resolve the LOS failure. 45. The EIS considered three alternatives to resolve the LOS failure at 16th A venue South and South 34151 Place. One assumes that the capacity restriction will resolve itself by drivers rerouting to avoid making the left-turn from westbound South 34151 Place to southbound 161h Avenue South, by rerouting to South 3361h Street and SR 99 when leaving the site, called the "Capacity Constrained Distribution" in the EIS. The second is to provide a connection between South 34151 Place and South 3441h Street, and use planned signalized intersections on South 344th Street at 161h Avenue South and SR 99 to access these roadways. The third alternative considered is to prohibit westbound left-turns from South 34151 Place to southbound 161h Avenue South and accommodate U- turns by constructing a roundabout at the intersection of SR 99 and 161h Avenue South. Based on staff analysis, alternatives one and three are not recommended. 46. The "Capacity Constrained Distribution" assumes that due to significant delays encountered when attempting to make a westbound left-turn from S 34151 Place to 161h Avenue S, drivers would Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 7 become frustrated and learn to use alternate routes. The EIS analysis assumed that most of these trips would leave the site to the north onto S 336th Street, and most would head west on S 3361h Street to SR 99 and turn left to 16th Avenue S or continue straight on SR 99. Although no capacity improvements appear warranted as a result of this assignment, staff has significant concerns about the safety of the l61h Avenue S / S 341 sl Place intersection under this scenario. It has been the City's experience that unsignalized intersections operating near capacity have a higher than average collision rate. This is due primarily to increased driver frustration, leading to drivers choosing gaps in opposing traffic that are inadequate to complete the maneuver safely. Therefore, this alternative is not recommended. 47. The roundabout alternative would provide adequate levels of service. In order to accommodate planned traffic volumes, it would have a 3-lane roundabout with an inscribed diameter of 200 feet. As SR 99 is a state highway, any intersection modifications would have to be approved by WSDOT. To date, WSDOT has not approved any three-lane roundabouts on the state highway system, and its historical reluctance to approve 2-lane roundabouts casts doubt as to whether this would be a viable alternative at this time. In addition, a roundabout would need right-of-way on both sides of SR 99, impacting developed properties on the east side of SR 99. Therefore, this alternative is not recommended. 48. Providing a connection between South 341 sl Place and South 344th Street reroutes traffic around the intersection of 16th Avenue South and South 341 Sl Place, and takes advantage of a project planned by the City to construct traffic signals on South 344th Street at 16th Avenue South and at SR 99. 49. Potential locations to provide this connection between South 341"1 Place and South 344th Street are 21 sl Avenue South and 18th Avenue South. Due to the presence of wetlands, three different alignments for 21 sl A venue South were considered in the EIS. An alignment along the existing right-of-way would impact wetlands and result in two stream crossings; an alignment to the east would cross the wetland at its narrowest width, but would still impact wetlands and result in two stream crossings; and an alignment to the west would avoid impacting the stream and wetlands, but would require right-of-way acquisition from the truck parking lot. 50. Eighteenth Avenue South has continuous right-of-way, but is not a through street due to an existing temporary berm. Eighteenth Avenue South provides a preferred alternative to 21 sl Avenue South due to the wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed 21 sl Avenue South alignments and the transitional nature of the residential neighborhood on 18th Avenue South. Pursuant to the FWCC, the applicant will construct 181h Avenue South as a Type R street between the southern extent of the street improvements in Kits Comer Business Park and South 344th Street. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1477, the required right-of-way width may be modified by the Director of Public Works to avoid right-of-way acquisition and lessen the impact to the neighborhood, and utility undergrounding will not be required. 51. The rerouting of trips using this connection on 18th Avenue South would add 417 trips to the east leg of South 3441h Street east of 16th Avenue South, and 128 trips between 16th Avenue South and SR 99 during the Sunday after service peak hour. Both of these intersections are currently unsignalized. The addition of these trips would create LOS failure and safety issues associated with unsignalized intersections operating over capacity. Staff has determined that these intersections would not operate safely if the project's trips impacted these intersections prior to the completion of the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) project scheduled for 2008 that would add left-turn lanes on South 3441h Street and signalize both intersections. Therefore, the applicant will construct traffic signals at these intersections. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-IO2271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 8 52. Staff analysis has determined that the project's trips meet warrants for left-turn lanes in the westbound direction at both the intersections of SR99 and 16th Avenue Sand S 344th Street and 16th Avenue S. Eastbound left-turn lanes may also be needed to line up lanes across the intersections within allowable tapers, depending on the intersection geometries; this will be determined through engineering plan review of these intersections. Although the EIS identifies impacts related to right- of-way acquisition in order to provide full-standard improvements, it is not necessary to provide full street improvements to mitigate the safety and LOS deficiencies at these intersections. The applicant will be required to develop a design that mitigates the safety and LOS impacts while minimizing right-of-way acquisition. The applicant will provide signalization and westbound left- turn lanes necessary to assure the safe operation of these intersections in the interim. Signal interconnect will also be provided between the two signalized intersections. The need for eastbound and westbound left-turn lanes will be determined during engineering plan review. The requirement for any of the left-turn lanes on South 344th Street may be waived by the Public Works Director if it is determined that to do so would require right-of-way acquisition. 53. The intersection of 16th Avenue South/Enchanted Parkway South (SR 161) at South 348th Street (SR 18) fails the adopted LOS standard during the school afternoon peak and the Sunday peak with or without the project. The project would add 150 trips during the school afternoon peak hour and 328 trips during the Sunday peak hour. The EIS identifies the construction of a second northbound right-turn lane as a mitigation measure that would correct the LOS deficiency during the school afternoon peak by improving the LOS from F to D, and reducing the LOS deficiency significantly during the Sunday peak hour by reducing the volume/capacity ratio from 1.24 to 1.04. This mitigation measure is in addition to the project in the adopted 2004-2009 TIP, which would add a third westbound left-turn lane and eastbound and westbound right-turn lanes. Based on the traffic analysis for the EIS, in order to function without being blocked by queues in the through lanes, the right-turn lanes would need to provide 550 feet of storage. Therefore, the applicant will pay $350,000 to expand the scope of the City's existing project to add the construction of a second right-turn lane with 550 feet of storage. 54. WSDOT is proposing to construct a major revision to the I-5/SR 18 interchange, which would include access between SR 161 and 1-5 to and from the north. This would provide an alternative route that would reduce traffic volumes through the intersection of SR 18 and SR 161. Therefore, it is unknown at this time what intersection configuration will be needed over the longer term at SR 18 and SR 161. Consequently, the addition of through lanes northbound that would be needed to meet the LOS standard in 2007 may not be needed after 2012. 55. The intersection at 20th Avenue South at the south central site access fails the adopted LOS standard during the Sunday after service peak as a result of the project. It is impacted by 1047 Sunday peak hour trips. The EIS addressed four options for addressing the LOS failure: provision of a two-way left-turn lane on 20th Avenue South, construction of a roundabout, signalization, and flagging the driveway during peak hours. Provision of a two-way left-turn lane is recommended to accommodate turning movement volumes, but does not fully mitigate the LOS deficiency. Left-turn volumes from 20th Avenue South into the driveways are high enough that the two-way left-turn lane would not be available for use as a refuge area for vehicles turning left from driveways onto 20th Avenue South. Flagger control during the project's peaks would safely manage traffic only when it is needed. CFC has proposed this option in the TMP. Given the low volumes of through traffic on 20th Avenue South during the project's peak hours of trip generation on Sundays, and the relative lack of impacts by the use of flagger control compared to the other alternatives, Dagger control is the recommended mitigation for this location. The applicant will provide Dagger control of this Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance . Page 9 driveway during Sunday peak hours, subject to conditions of the Right-of-Way Activity Permit to be issued by the Department of Public Works. 56. The EIS suggests as a mitigation measure to minimize the intrusion of project-generated traffic into residential neighborhoods to the north of the site an education program to influence route choices by notices, announcements, and new member orientation used to educate drivers. Pursuant to FWCP Policy TP5, the applicant will provide an ongoing education program to minimize traffic intrusion into adjacent residential neighborhoods. 57. The EIS discusses a broad range of traffic calming tools that might be used to discourage through traffic from using 20th Avenue South north of the site, and to maintain reasonable speeds for a residential neighborhood for those that do choose to use 20th Avenue South. Based on the analysis of the alternatives by staff, a through movement diverter is recommended and will be placed at the intersection of 20th Avenue South and South 336th Street, and is intended to prohibit through movements on 20th Avenue South across South 336th Street. All other movements at the intersection would be permitted. The design will accommodate transit turning movements and full access for emergency vehicles, making it possible that smaller vehicles could still drive around the diverter. 58. Despite the diverter, some project-generated traffic may still be expected to use 20th Avenue South to the north of the site. Therefore, there is still some need to discourage the use of 20th Avenue South through traffic calming north of the site, even with the through movement diverter. Traffic circles have been found by many agencies to significantly reduce intersection collisions and slightly reduce midblock vehicle speeds. In order to be effective at reducing speeds and encourage yielding behavior, deflection of the driver's path upon entry to the traffic circle is required. At a three-legged intersection such as at South 332nd Street, additional pavement widening may be required to provide for adequate deflection and provide positive guidance to the driver. In no case should additional right-of-way be required. Pursuant to FWCP Policy TP5, the applicant will place the through movement diverter at the intersection at South 336th Street, and yield-controlled traffic circles at South 330th Street and South 332nd Street to reduce intersection collisions and midblock vehicle speeds. 59. The residential segment of 18th Avenue South will be improved to a Type R street. The applicant has proposed that the existing bulb in the right-of-way where the existing cul-de-sac bulb is located be used as a location for a median island to create a chicane effect, and staff proposes that curb returns on 18th Avenue South be bulb ed-out into the intersections at South 341 st Place and South 344th Street to reduce the potential for trucks to use 18th Avenue South through the residential neighborhood. Staff also recommends signage be placed to prohibit trucks on 18th Avenue South between South 341 st Place and South 344th Street and two speed humps be installed. A Neighborhood Traffic Meeting was held June 3, 2004, and Staff will work with the residents on 18th Avenue South to determine the best solution for improving 18th Avenue South. 60. The EIS discusses the potential advantage of extending the code-required frontage improvements on the south side of South 336th Street to provide pedestrian access to transit and the sidewalk network on SR 99. The intersection of SR 99 and South 336th Street is served by Metro Route 182 and Pierce Transit Routes 402 and 500. The City's project on SR 99 will provide transit amenities at the bus stops at this intersection. These improvements could be provided at little additional expense and would connect to one of the best-served transit corridors in the City. Therefore, pursuant to FWCP Policies TP62, TP65, and TP77, the applicant shall provide sidewalk on the south side of South 336th Street to be extended from the west property line of the site to SR 99. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit 0 to Adoption Ordinance Page 10 61. The EIS discusses the provision of transit amenities such as shelters, benches, bus landing pads, etc. as a potential mitigation measure. The site is served by Pierce Transit Route 501 at a bus stop located on the south side of South 336th Street east of 20th A venue South, and a bus stop located on the east side of 20th A venue South north of South 336th Street. Sidewalks will be provided to the bus zone by code-required frontage improvements on South 336th Street. Pursuant to FWCP Policies TP62, TP65, and TP77, the applicant will provide a transit shelter (if requested by King County Metro or Pierce Transit), shelter footing, litter receptacle pad, bus landing pad, and bench, designed to King County Metro standards, located by City staff in consultation with King County Metro and Pierce Transit staff on the north side of South 336th Street east of 20th Avenue South, and on the east side of 20th Avenue South north of South 336th Street. In addition, the sidewalk will be extended on the east side of 20th Avenue South from the intersection of South 336th Street to this latter bus zone. This will help mitigate increased vehicle trips from the project. 62. The EIS addresses pro-rata share mitigation for impacts to capital projects listed on the City's TIP based on the specific project generated trips. The calculation of pro-rata contributions is described in the TIA Guidelines item VI.D. In general, the pro-rata contribution is the number of evening peak project-generated trips divided by the total evening peak hour traffic with the project multiplied by the estimated cost of the TIP project. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1475 and FWCP Policy TP62, the applicant shall either construct the impacted TIP projects or pay $235,900 as a pro-rata mitigation payment for impacts to projects in the 2004-2009 TIP, as identified in the Agreement. 63. The project impacts a capital project in unincorporated King County at the intersection of South 320th Street and Military Road S. Therefore, the applicant will pay King County $647 as a pro-rata share mitigation payment for impacts to the County project. 64. The development proposal includes signalization of the intersection of 20th Avenue South and South 336th Street. This intersection meets Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) warrants for signalization under existing conditions; thus the proposal is consistent with FWCC Section 22-1476. The MUTCD also recommends that traffic signals within one-half mile of each other be able to be coordinated. This intersection is one-quarter mile east of the signalized intersection of SR 99 and South 336th Street. FWCP Map III-3 shows that these facilities were planned to have signal communications available between them. Pursuant to FWCP Policy TP39, the applicant will provide signal interconnect on South 336th Street between SR 99 and 20th Avenue South. 65. Based on the traffic analysis in the EIS, left-turn lanes on South 336th Street are warranted during all weekday peak hours analyzed eastbound, and during all peak hours analyzed westbound. In order to provide the left-turn lanes, the existing westbound shoulder could be restriped as a through lane. However, this would eliminate the safe walking route for school children to reach a school bus stop on 20th Avenue South from South Garden Court and Green Crest Villas condominiums. Therefore, the applicant will provide continuous sidewalk improvements on the north side of South 336th Street between South Garden Court and Green Crest Villas to provide a safe walking route to the bus stop. 66. The TIA guidelines adopt the use of an article, Guidelines for Right- Turn Treatments at Signalized Intersections, for determining the need for right-turn lanes at signalized intersections. Based on the traffic analysis in the EIS, right-turn lanes are warranted on all legs of the intersection of 20th Avenue South and South 336th Street. In conjunction with the through movement diverter, no through lanes on 20th Avenue South would be required. Thus, no additional widening would be Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-IO2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page II necessary on the south leg of the intersection. On the north leg of the intersection, the right-turn lane would have to have a vehicle storage length of 175 feet to function effectively. A right-turn lane on the west leg of the intersection would require additional right-of-way dedication ITom the project, and would have to provide 100 feet of storage to function effectively. Per WSDOT Design Manual Figure 910-14, right-turn lanes would also require 50-foot tapers. The applicant shall construct improvements to the intersection of 20th Avenue South at South 336th Street that provide signalization; signal interconnect on South 336th Street between SR 99 and 20th Avenue South; left- turn lanes on all legs of the intersection and an eastbound right turn lane with 100 feet of storage; a southbound right-turn lane that provides 175 feet of storage; the diverter island that would prohibit through movements on 20th Avenue South. These improvements mitigate the project impacts by providing adequate levels of service at the intersection, while discouraging project-generated traffic from impacting residential neighborhoods north of the site. 67. Based on the traffic analysis in the EIS, under the worst case queuing, the westbound left-turn lane at the intersection of SR 99 and South 336th Street would need a storage length of 450 feet. The existing storage available is 100 feet. The increase in storage length, combined with associated tapers per WSDOT Standard Plan H-3, would overlap the taper necessary to accommodate the 1eft- turn lane at the site driveway onto South 336th Street. Therefore, pursuant to FWCC Section 22- 1475, the applicant will provide a continuous left-turn lane between SR 99 and 20th Avenue South. 68. New traffic signals are proposed at the intersections of 20th Avenue South at South 336th Street, 16th Avenue South at South 344th Street, and SR 99 at South 344th Street. In addition, the project would significantly alter travel patterns before and after Sunday services. New signal coordination timing plans would need to be developed to accommodate safe and efficient travel in the project vicinity. Pursuant to FWCP Policy TP39, the applicant will develop timing plans for Sunday peak hours of the development at SR 99 at South 324th Street, SR 99 at South 330th Street, SR 99 at South 336th Street, 20th Avenue South at South 336th Street, 16th Avenue South at SR 99, 16th Avenue South at South 344th Street, and SR 161 at SR 18. 69. Transportation mitigation provided in the Development Agreement is consistent with goals and policies contained in the FWCP Transportation Chapter, including TP5, TP10, TP14, TP16, TP20, TP21, TP23, TP30, TP38, TP39, TP45, TP47, TP62, TP65, and TP77. 70. FWCC Section 22-1671 sets out factors to be considered for a development agreement. The City may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors when considering a development agreement: 1) compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; 2) adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; 3) potential benefits of the proposal to the community; and 4) effect upon other aspects of the comprehensive plan. 71. Development of the site in accordance with all adopted City codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation contained in the Development Agreement, will address project-related impacts and ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. Transportation impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will be addressed by code-required street frontage improvements and mitigation established in the development agreement, including additional street and sidewalk connections; a new street through the site; traffic calming measures such as traffic circles and island diverters; signalization; transit shelter improvements; signal timing plans; traffic management plan; and operational parameters governing use of the site. Conditions of the Hearing Examiner's Process IV decision will ensure that project-related impacts to on site wetlands, streams, and buffers are addressed. Mitigation in the Development Agreement pertaining Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-IO2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 12 to clearing, grading, and landscaping, will further address construction and development-related impacts. The Director's Design Decision also ensures quality design standards and project aesthetics for compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods. Additionally, the use of the property as a church and school is more compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods than the types of uses allowed under BP zoning. Therefore, development of the site in accordance with all adopted City codes, policies, regulations, and conditions of approval, and mitigation contained in the Development Agreement is compatible with, and will not adversely impact, adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. 72. Development of the site in accordance with all City codes, policies, and regulations and conditions of approval and mitigation contained in the Development Agreement will ensure adequacy of, and address impacts to, community facilities including roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools. Potential transportation-related impacts to adjacent street and the City transportation system were considered in the EIS. Mitigation for these impacts included in the Development Agreement, pursuant to City Code and the EIS, includes system improvements such as construction and dedication of 20th Avenue South through the site, connecting and improving 18th A venue South, ITontage improvements, signalizing of intersections, and traffic calming measures and transit improvements. Driveway and street access to the site was reviewed and determined to be at the optimal location and configuration, subject to the City's adopted design standards and street plans. The recreational needs of the school and day care students will be met on site by the code-required outdoor play areas, and the play field. The minimum amount of outdoor play area included in the Development Agreement meets and exceeds the requirements of the City of Federal Way and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. In addition, users of the site may utilize City parks in the area. Any such use is expected to be small. The proposed development contains a private school. 73. The proposed church and school are expected to generate employment opportunities and potential economic and social benefits. Based on information provided by CFC, it would employ 120 employees. CFC hosts several major conferences each year, including the Vision Conference attracting 2,500 - 3,000 visitors each March, and a women's conference attracting approximately 2,000 visitors each November. CFC also participates in foreign exchange programs and estimates approximately fifteen to twenty percent of its students are ITom foreign countries. Employees, members of the congregation, and others who come for services, meetings, and school, may also patronize local merchants and service providers such as retail, restaurants, hotels, and entertainment. Therefore, more economic benefit would be anticipated than is currently generated by the existing vacant site. Additionally, CFC proposes several commercial activities on the site, including latte stands and bookstores, which are expected to generate revenue. As proposed and as required, the project will construct needed right-of-way improvements on and off site, including a new fully-improved City street through the site; street ITontage improvements including curbs, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, street lights, and a bike lane; and other street improvements identified in the Development Agreement. Such improvements will promote safe and effective vehicle and pedestrian circulation on the site and in the immediate vicinity. In addition, the project will convert a large, vacant site that has historically been unused to a development that meets all City code requirements for landscaping, lighting, pedestrian amenities, site surveillance, and architectural design principles. CFC will provide educational opportunities through a school and college. It will provide recreation fields and a venue for special events within the City. Conditions contained in the Development Agreement will ensure mitigation of adverse impacts to on-site environmentally sensitive areas resulting ITom the development. Also, religious organizations typically operate or participate in various local social service-related programs such as food and clothing banks, Youth programs, and counseling, from which the community may benefit. Therefore, development of the site in accordance with all City codes, policies, regulations, and conditions of approval and Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 13 mitigation contained in the Development Agreement will provide potential benefits to the community. 74. Development of the site in accordance with all City codes, policies, and regulations and conditions of approval and mitigation contained in the Development Agreement will have no negative impact upon any other aspects of the comprehensive plan. The vision of the FWCP is to provide a supply of land for such uses as services, employment, parks, open space, and housing to meet future demand. If developed as proposed, the Project will provide land for services, employment, and recreational areas. The BP zone is that zone intended for industrial uses including manufacturing and warehousing. The July 2000 Market Analysis concluded that there would be a low demand for BP-zoned land. Therefore, the reduction in BP zoned land, resulting from changing the designation of this site from Business Park to Multiple Family will not affect the vision of the comprehensive plan. 75. FWCC Sections 22-529 (incorporating 22-448(c) by reference) and 22-530 set forth the factors that may be considered for a site-specific comprehensive plan amendment and associated rezone, and the criteria for such amendments. The City may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors when considering a proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan: the effect upon the physical environment; the effect on open space, streams, and lakes; the compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; the adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; the benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; the quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; the current and projected population density in the area; and the effect upon other aspects of the comprehensive plan. In order to encourage efficient and desired development and redevelopment of existing land designated and zoned for various types of commercial uses, when considering proposals for comprehensive plan amendments and rezones from one commercial designation to another, the City will consider development trends in commercially zones areas, market demand for various types of commercial land, and amount of vacant commercial land. For site-specific comprehensive plan amendments, the provisions of FWCC Section 22-488(c) shall also apply. 76. FWCC Section 22-488 established the following rezone criteria that must be considered. The proposed rezone is in the best interest of the residents of the City; and the proposed rezone is appropriate because either: 1) conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly changed since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed conditions, a rezone is within the public interest; or 2) the rezone will correct a zone classification or zone boundary that was inappropriate when established; it is consistent with the comprehensive plan; it is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan; and it is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; and the proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; and the site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; and the site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon the public services and utilities; and the rezone has merit and value for the community as a whole. 77. The requested comprehensive plan amendment and rezone, from BP to RM 3600, would not in itself affect the physical environment if approved. It would result in changes to the comprehensive plan map and zoning map. Pursuant to the proposed Development Agreement, development of the site would be limited to two buildings with associated parking and recreational and athletic fields. One building would consist of a church sanctuary, school auditorium, and approved accessory uses, and the other building would be used as a private school. An evaluation of potential impacts to the Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 14 physical environment as a result of the development of the site as proposed was conducted in an EIS. If the property is developed in accordance with all applicable adopted City codes, policies, regulations, and mitigation contained in the proposed Development Agreement, impacts to the physical environment will be mitigated. 78. The site contains environmentally sensitive areas, as studied in the EIS, including regulated wetlands and streams and their buffers. The Hearing Examiner has approved certain intrusions into these areas, subject to City Council decisions on the comprehensive plan amendment, rezone, development agreement and development plan, in order to construct the project as proposed. Activities approved by the Examiner include filling a Category III wetland and its buffer, and related mitigation including a created wetland and additional buffer area in and adjacent to a Category II wetland on the site. Additional intrusions into wetland and stream buffer were approved in order to accommodate an access road and construct required right-of-way and related improvements including pavement widening, retaining walls, and extending storm pipes and stream culverts. Construction of the site in accordance with all conditions of the Hearing Examiner's decision will result in no net loss of wetlands and wetland buffers and stream buffers. In addition, pursuant to the Hearing Examiner's conditions of approval, all on site wetlands, streams, and their required buffers will be set aside and recorded as Native Growth Protection Easements or Tracts and permanently protected from any future land modifications or intrusions. In addition, the Development Agreement establishes mitigation pertaining to surface water drainage detention and water quality treatment that meets and exceeds code requirements. No lakes are present on the site. If the property is developed in accordance with all applicable adopted City codes, policies, regulations, and mitigation contained in the Hearing Examiner Decision and proposed Development Agreement, impacts on open space, streams and lakes will be mitigated. 79. The request for a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning from BP to RM 3600 zoning (one unit per 3,600 square feet) is accompanied by a proposed Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement, which contains a variety of mitigation measures related to site use and operation, transportation, parking, landscaping, and surface water drainage, designed to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. In addition, rezoning the site from industrial to multifamily with a church and school development would be more compatible with residentially-zoned properties in the area than uses that may develop under the current industrial zoning, such as a warehousing facility with associated truck traffic. If the property is developed in accordance with all applicable adopted City codes, policies, regulations, and mitigation contained in the proposed Development Agreement, the development will be compatible with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods, and impacts on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods will be mitigated. 80. Development of the site as proposed, in accordance with all applicable codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation measures contained in the Development Agreement, will ensure the adequacy of, and mitigate impacts on, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools. 81. The July 2000 Market Analysis concluded that there would be only an 11 to 13 percent demand for BP-zoned land in the 2000 to 2020 period. Therefore, it is possible that this land would not develop for BP uses in the near future. Conversion of the vacant site trom vacant property, which is unlikely to develop in the near future, to a developed site as proposed, in accordance with all applicable codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation measures contained in the Development Agreement, will be a benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 15 82. Due to the size of its existing congregation, school, and accessory uses such as administrative offices, Dominion College, day care, and future projections for growth, the CFC would like to locate on an approximate 50-acre parcel. Based on a survey of the King County Assessor's records conducted by City staff, there are only two vacant parcels in the City that are 25 acres or more in size. One of these is the parcel under discussion and the other one is the subject of Kits Comer request, located south of South 336th Street and west of Pacific Highway. The July 2000 Market Analysis concluded that there would be only an 11 to 13 percent demand for BP-zoned land in the 2000 to 2020 period. Therefore, it is possible that this land would not develop for BP uses in the near future and a comprehensive plan change and rezone to multiple family zoning and development of the site as proposed, in accordance with all applicable codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation measures contained in the Development Agreement, will provide the quantity and location of land necessary for the proposed land use, density, and demand for such use. 83. If this site were developed today as warehousing under the existing BP zoning, it would generate approximately 268 employees. Based on information provided by the CFC, if the request for a multiple family designation was granted, and the facility was constructed as proposed, it would employ 120 employees. If the comprehensive plan and rezone is approved pursuant to the proposed Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement, the use of the site is limited to the proposed church and school and permitted accessory uses, and it will not generate housing units. Rezoning of this site to allow development as a church and school will not impact the City's ability to meet required housing targets mandated under the Growth Management Act (GMA). Therefore, the proposal will not impact current and projected population density in the area. 84. There will not be any adverse impacts upon any other aspect of the comprehensive plan as a result of the proposed change from industrial zoning to multifamily zoning, pursuant to an approved Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement. The vision of the comprehensive plan is to provide a supply of land for such uses as services, employment, parking, open space, and housing, to meet future demand. The BP zone is that zone intended for industrial uses, including manufacturing and warehousing. One of the reasons that the July 2000 Market Analysis was prepared was to determine whether the City has a 20-year supply of adequately zoned land to meet future demand. The Market Analysis concluded that there would be a low (11-13 percent) demand for BP-zoned land within the 20-year horizon. Therefore, changing the designation of this site from BP to multiple family will not affect the vision of the comprehensive plan of providing an adequate supply ofland to meet future demand. 85. As described Findings 77 through 84 above, the requested comprehensive plan amendment and rezone as mitigated does not adversely impact the physical or natural environment; surrounding properties; the adequacy of community facilities; population; or the comprehensive plan; including the supply of and demand for BP-zoned property in the City. Therefore, the rezone is in the best interests of the residents of the City. 86. The City of Federal Way incorporated in February 1990. At that time, the parcels proposed for development by CFC had a mix of multi-family zoning on the west and light manufacturing zoning on the east. Upon incorporation, the City of Federal Way zoned the parcels Manufacturing Park (MP). This was changed to Business Park (BP) in 1995. Properties to the north across South 336th Street have developed as multi-family in recent years. However, very little BP zoned land has developed in this area. Additionally, the July 2000 Market Study found that there would be only an 11 to 13 percent demand for BP-zoned land in the 2000 to 2020 period. As a result, rezoning this property is appropriate and in the public interest, to allow its development rather than remaining Christian Faith Center Files CP A99-0004, 02-1 02271-00-UP, 02-1 02272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 16 vacant, while at the same time maintaining an adequate supply of industrial zoned property to meet the anticipated demand. 87. The criterion that the rezone will correct a zone classification or zone boundary that was inappropriate when established is not applicable. 88. The requested rezone from BP to RM-3600 does not conflict with the vision of the comprehensive plan to accommodate industrial uses, such as warehousing and manufacturing, in BP zones located on both sides of SR-99 in the vicinity south of South 336th Street, with other BP nodes located around South 272nd Street and South 348th Street. As noted in Finding 84 above, the requested comprehensive plan change and rezone will not decrease the City's supply of BP-zoned property commensurate with the anticipated demand. Rezoning and development of the site pursuant to all applicable adopted City codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation contained in the proposed Development Agreement, will ensure consistency with the comprehensive plan. 89. If the request is granted, use and development of the site must comply with all applicable provisions of this "chapter" (FWCC) and all applicable adopted regulations; Process IV conditions of approval; mitigation; and the FWCP. Furthermore, a comprehensive plan amendment from BP to multiple family and associated rezone is required for the property to be developed as a church and school. Therefore, the requested rezone, if approved and developed pursuant to all applicable adopted City codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation contained in the proposed Development Agreement, will be consistent with the comprehensive plan and the "chapter" . 90. The requested comprehensive plan amendment and rezone has been analyzed and determined to be consistent with the FWCC and adopted regulations; and the FWCP, and is therefore consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 91. Based on Findings 86 through 90, the criteria in FWCC Section 22-488(c)(I)a-e) are met. 92. The proposed development has been reviewed pursuant to all applicable provisions of this chapter (FWCC), and as proposed and as conditioned, it complies with this chapter in all respects. 93. The use of a Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement enables the City to limit the use of the site to a church, school, and approved accessory uses. As described in Findings 77 through 84, the Development Agreement has been crafted to minimize adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity. Examples include, but are not limited to, requiring a larger buffer along South 336th Street, limiting the enrollment of the school and Dominion College, and restricting the scheduling of activities, such as requiring school classes to be completed by 3:30 p.m. and not scheduling special events that add trips during peak hours of other uses. The site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. 94. All public services and utilities are available and adequate to serve the proposed development. Lakehaven Utility District has provided Certificates of Water and Sewer Availability for the site, and will provide these services pursuant to developer extension agreements between the applicant and District. Fire and emergency medical services will be provided by the Federal Way Fire Department. A City-operated regional storm drainage detention pond located in the northwest portion of the site has been determined to have sufficient capacity to accommodate surface water Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-IO2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 17 drainage from the westerly sub-basin of the proposed development. The applicant will provide storm drainage detention facilities for the easterly sub-basin on the site in accordance with the FWCC and Development Agreement. Surface water drainage mitigation contained in the Development Agreement provides a higher standard of water quality treatment for both the East and West Sub-basins on the site, and a higher standard of detention on the East Sub-basin, than would otherwise be required by code. The site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon public services and utilities. 95. Rezoning of this site from BP to multiple family has merit and value for the community as a whole because it will allow development of a site that has not yet been developed and may not develop under the current zoning based on the City's Market Analysis, it supports Growth Management Act goals and policies for urban development, and for the reasons stated in Finding 73. 96. The proposed comprehensive plan amendment has been analyzed and determined to be consistent with the FWCC and FWCP, and therefore bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare. 97. The requested comprehensive plan amendment, rezone, and development of the site as a church and school pursuant to the proposed Development Agreement, is expected to generate some benefits to the community; including employment opportunities, development of a previously undeveloped site, potential economic benefit to local shopping areas, restaurants, and hotels; and provision of social services such as food and clothing banks, and youth programs, and counseling programs, as discussed in Finding 73. Therefore, the proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City. 98. RCW Chapter 36.70A, the Growth Management Act, requires the City of Federal Way to adopt and implement a comprehensive plan and to amend it in a timely manner, but no more than once a year, except under certain circumstances. The City is responding to this mandate by updating the comprehensive plan. FWCP Page IV-7 (Economic Development), recogniz€s that there has been no substantive BP development since the City's incorporation, which suggests the influence of market forces outside of the City limits, where cheaper land and established industrial parks act as a draw for prospective park development. Therefore, the change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning of this site from BP to multiple family will not reduce the supply of BP-zoned property below what is necessary, and will enable development consistent with the economic development vision in the plan. The proposal is consistent with FWCP Economic Development Policies EDPll, EDP22, and EDP23, related to bringing in new jobs to the community, developing cultural and recreational opportunities, and encouraging the development of new multi-purpose facilities in order to increase the number of visitors to Federal Way and resultant visitor spending. The proposed amendment is, therefore, consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. 99. As addressed in the staff report, the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and rezone have been reviewed and determined to be consistent with all applicable decisional criteria contained in the FWCC, and with the applicable goals and policies contained in the FWCP. 100. As addressed in the staff report, the Development Agreement and Development Plan have been reviewed and determined to be consistent with all applicable decisional criteria contained in the FWCC, and with the applicable goals and policies contained in the FWCP. K:\CFC\Documents\Findings - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 18 MEETING DATE: July 6, 2004 ITEM# ll/IL(C) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Request to Delete the Weyerhaeuser Way South Extension, North of South 320th Street CATEGORY: D CONSENT D RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS k8J ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ .......-....-..-.--.............-....... ..........................................-............--.........................--..-.-..............-.-.-....---.-.-............... .................-.......-...................-.....-.-.........-................................................... .......-......................-........... ...................-.-.----......--..-................................................. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft Adoption Ordinance; 2) Exhibit A -Amendments to Maps III-5, III-6, and III-27B, and Table III-19 ofthe Comprehensive Plan; 3) Exhibit B - April 27, 2004, Memorandum to the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) with Exhibits 1 and 2. ...........................--...-........... -.. ... - ........ ................................-.................................................-.-...........-.....-.-- -.................................-.- ..-................................................-............ ................_... ..................-...... .-............................ -----...--..... ...-- -.-..... ..-- ...... ....-................. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Federal Way adopted its Comprehensive Plan in November of 1995, and amended the plan in December of 1998, September 2000, November 2001, and March 2003. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the Growth Management Act (GMA) limits plan updates to no more than once per year except under certain circumstances. In order to comply with RCW 36.70A.130, the Council shall be considering three separate actions: the Potential Annexation Area Subarea (PAA) Plan; the request by the Christian Faith Center (CFC) for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone, and approval of a development agreement and development plan; and a request by the Quadrant Corporation to delete the Weyerhaeuser Way extension north of South 320th from the comprehensive plan and to delete this project from Table 1II-19 (Regional CIP Project List). These amendment requests were initiated at different times, but will be acted upon simultaneously to amend the comprehensive plan. The PAA Subarea Plan and the CFC Request are being considered on separate Agenda Bills with separate ordinances. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 24, 2004, and recommended approval of the request by Quadrant to delete the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the comprehensive plan, and to delete this project from Table 1II-19 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit A), replacing it with 32nd Avenue South, and to amend Maps 1II-5, III-6, and III-27B (Exhibit A). .....-...........................-.......................-.....................................-..................... ..,.,.""..,."""........",-."..".,..""""""-,,.--.---.-.....-..........................--....-........'..'.-.....".......-................-..-........................-..................-........................-....... ................-....................................-.......-.....-............-.................-.....-............- CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the Planning Commission's recommendation during a public meeting on May 3, 2004. At the close of this meeting, the LUTC made a motion to recommend approval of the amendments to the text and maps ofthe comprehensive plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. ..........-....-............-.......................................-...........-...-.........................-.-................-.-.........................-.............-....-....--........-................................ ............................................. .............................-............................. ........-........................--....... PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the ordinance adopting amendments to the comprehensive plan and enactment on July 20, 2004." ~~:;;;;"¡¡;A~;;'~~¡;:~ -... ..............................- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) .........................................-....-..... ...............-....-...... COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # 3y-~ Revised - 05/10/2001 1:\2003 Comprehensive Plan\City Council\070604 CC Cover Agenda.doc/06/18/2004 12:58 PM DRAFT {ì/2- 7( () ~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Chapter 36.70A RCW or "GMA") requires the City ofF ederal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use element (including a land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities element, and transportation element (including transportation system map[s]); and WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations implementing its comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with land use map (the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land use map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998, September 14,2000, November 1,2001, and March 27, 2003; and WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Article IX, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC); and WHEREAS, under RCW 36. 70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to continuing review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year; and WHEREAS, the Council shall be considering three separate actions to amend the comprehensive plan all of which will be acted upon simultaneously in order to comply with RCW 36. 70A.130, and WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 04-_, adoption of a Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Subarea Plan, which will replace Chapter 8, "Potential Annexation Areas," of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and address certain comprehensive plan text changes pertaining to the Community Business (BC) comprehensive plan designation and zoning; and ,PAGEl ORO# WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 04-_, a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM 3600), and associated development agreement and development plan, for 49.97 acres located south of South 336111 Street between Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5; and WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 04-_, deleting the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320tl1 Street shown on Map III-27B from the Comprehensive Plan and deleting this project from Table III-19 (Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP] List); and WHEREAS, in September 2002, the City of Federal Way accepted a request from the Quadrant Corporation to remove the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the comprehensive plan, and to delete this project from Table III-I 9 (Regional CIP Project List); and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2004, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Detennination of Nonsignificance on the proposed amendments to Map III-27B and Table III-19 ofthe comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments address all of the goals and requirements set forth in the GMA; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council committees, and full City Council has received, discussed, and considered the testimony, written comments, and material from the public, as follows: 1. The City's Planning Commission considered the requests for amendments to Map III 27-B and Table III-19 of the comprehensive plan at a public hearing held on April 21, 2004, following which it recommended approval of the request by Quadrant to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320111 Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan), and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Capital Improvement Program [CIP] - 2009 to 2020) based on the following conditions: ORO# , PAGE 2 (i) Map 1II-5 ~ Functional Classification of Existing and Planned Streets and Highways: Upgrade 321ld Avenue South to a principal collector between the planned Weyerhaeuser Way South extension/32nd Avenue intersection and South 320th Street. (ii) Map 1II-6 - Planned Street Sections: Revise the same segment of 32nd Avenue South from a Type R street to a Type 0 Street. (iii) Map 1II-27B - 2003-2020, Regional Capital Improvement Plan: Realign Project 35 from Weyerhaeuser Way extension to 32nd Avenue South. (iv) Table 111-19 - Regional CIP Project List: Revise description of Map ID 35, replacing "Weyerhaeuser Way S" with "32nd Ave S." 2. The Land Use and Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the proposed amendments to the maps and table of the comprehensive plan on May 3, 2004, following which it recommended adoption ofthe Planning Commission's recommendations; and 3. The full City Council considered the matter at its meetings on July 6, 2004, and July 20, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the request by the Quadrant Corporation to remove the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, by adopting the amendments to Maps III-5, III-6, and III-27B, and Table III-19. Now, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings. A. The proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan, as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, to remove the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, and upgrade 32nd Avenue South to a principal collector between the planned Weyerhaeuser Way South extension/32nd Avenue intersection and South 320th Street, and revise this segment from a Type "R" to a Type "0" street would ORO# , PAGE 3 accommodate forecast travel in the study area with the same travel times and approximately the same vehicle miles traveled and is therefore consistent with the comprehensive plan. B. The proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, would not result in any additional impacts to adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods as the traffic that would have traveled on the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would shift to and be accommodated by the 32nd Avenue extension. C. Deletion of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension will allow for growth and development consistent with the Plan's overall vision and with the Plan's land use element household and job projections, and will allow reasonable use of property subject to constraints necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas. The amendments, therefore, bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; are in the best interest of the residents of the City; and are consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36. 70A RCW, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan. Section 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Adoption. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998,2000,2001, and 2003, copies of which are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby are and shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 3. Amendment Authority. The adoption of Plan amendments in Section 2 above is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541. Section 4. Severabilitv. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, 200 I, and 2003 shall remain in force and effect until the amendments thereto become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance. ORD# , PAGE 4 Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ,2004. day of CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Mayor, Dean McColgan A TrEST: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE No: 1:\2003 Comprehensive PlanlCity CouncillAdoption Ordinance.doc/06/29/2004 3:57 PM ORD# ,PAGE 5 EXH JeIT A Table 111-19 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - 2009 to 2020 Project Map 2000 Cumulative Number ID Project Description Cost Totals CAPITAL PROJECT LIST 96-04 1 S 352"" SI: SR 99 - SR 161: Extend 3-lane principal collector, signal at SR 4,066,000 4,066,000 99 92-21 2 S 336'" St: 18'" Ave S - Weyerhaeuser Way S: Widen to 3 lanes 1,200,000 5,266,000 95-17 3 SR 99: S 340'" St - S 356'" St: Construct HOV lanes, add WB right-turn 12,096,000 17,362,000 lane, 2nd SB left-turn lane (âJ 348th 95-02 4 S 312'" SI: 23"' Ave S - 28'" Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 2,856,000 20,218,000 02-01 5 S 320'" St (âJ 1-5: Add HOV lanes on S 320'" St 4,1 04,000 24,322,000 98-25 6 S 348'" St: 1" Ave S - 9'" Ave S: Add HOV lanes 5,174,000 29,496,000 98-08 7 S 320'" St: 1" Ave S-8'" AveS: AddHOV lanes 5,174,000 34,670,000 01-02 8 S 316TH At (âJ 20'" Ave S: Signal modifications 100,000 34,770,000 98-05 9 S 324m St: SR 99 - 23"' Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes, add 3'" WB left-turn lane 2,200,000 36,970,000 (âJ SR 99 93-09 10 1" Ave S: S 366'" St- SR 99: Extend 2-lane road 3,328,000 40,298,000 01-05 11 SR 99 (âJ S 312'" SI: Add NB 2nd left-turn lanes 1,680,000 41,978,000 94-24 12 14'" Ave S: S 312'" St- S 316'" St: Ring Road extension 4,066,000 46,044,000 93-08 13 S 316'" St: SR 99 -11'" PI S: ring Road extension 6,160,000 52,204,000 95-03 14 S 312'" SI: 28'" Ave S - Military Rd: Extend 5-lane arterial, interchange @ 23,894,000 76,098,000 1-5 92-20 IS SW 320'" St @ 47'" Ave SW: Signalize 180,000 76,278,000 02-04 16 SR 18 @ SR 161: Add 3'" SB thru lane, 3'" SB left-turn lane, 2ndNB right- 1,080,000 77,358,000 turn lane 92-23 17 S 304'" St: SR 99 - 28m Ave S: Widen to 3 lanes 2,376,000 79,734,000 92-14 18 Military Rd S: S Star Lk Rd - S 288'" St: Widen to 5 lanes 5,280,000 85,014,000 98-01 19 S 304'" St (âJ SR 99: Add left-turn lanes on 304'" 432,000 85,446,000 99-06 20 SR 99 @ S 336m St: Add 200 EB and SB left lane, widen 336m to 5 lanes to 761,000 86,207,000 20th 00-12 21 S 308'" St: 14'" Ave S 18'" Ave S: widen to 3 lanes 1,173,000 87,380,000 00-08 22 SW 336'" St/Campus Dr @ 21" Ave SW: Add 2nd LT lanes EB, WB, NB, 1,680,000 89,060,000 and SB; add WB right-turn lane 98-15 23 Military Rd S: S 288'" St - 1-5 (S): Widen to 5 lanes 14,280,000 103,340,000 00-09 24 SW 320'" SI: 21" Ave SW - 26'" Ave SW: Signal modifications and 100,000 103,440,000 interconnect 97-01 25 SW Campus Dr & SW 340m St: 10m Ave SW - Hoyt Rd SW: Signal :410,000 103,650,000 coordination 00-02 26 S 312m St @ 28'" Ave S: Add SB right-turn lane 120,000 103,770,000 98-34 27 SW 320'" St (âJ 21" Ave SW: Add 2nd WB left-turn lane 720,000 104,490,000 98-32 28 13'" PI S: S 330'" St - S 336'" St: Extend 3 lane collector 3,024,000 107,514,000 98-17 29 S Star Lk Rd: S 27200 St- Military Rd S: Widen to 3 lanes 1,280,000 108,794,000 98-23 30 47m Ave SW: SR 509 - SW 320m St: Widen to 3 lanes 1,600,000 110,394,000 93-07c 31 21st Ave SW: SW 344m St- SW 356m St: Widen to 5 lanes 1,875,000 112,269,000 98-13 32 SW 344m St & 35m Ave SW: 21" Ave SW - SW 340" SI: Bike lanes, 2,620,000 114.889,000 sidewalks 94-10 33 SR 509: I" Ave S - SR 99: Widen to 3 lanes 8,000,000 122,889,000 94-11 34 S 308m SI: 5" PI S - 8m Ave S: Extend 2-1ane street 1,440,000 124,329,000 98-18 35 28'" Ave S/S 317'" St: S 304'" St- 23'" Ave S: Widen to 3 lanes 4,200,000 128,529,000 98-57 36 SR 509: 30'" Ave SW - 47'" Ave SW: Widen to 3 lanes 6,400,000 134,929,000 98-58 37 SR 509: 47'" Ave SW - West City Limits: Widen to 3 lanes 6,400,000 141,329,000 00-10 38 SW 330m St (âJ 1" Ave S: Signal modifications, extend NB left-turn lane 250,000 141,579,000 98-24 39 Hoyt Rd SW: SW 320m St - SW 340'" St: Widen to 3 lanes 7,200,000 148,779,000 92-22 40 1" Ave S: S 348'" St- S 356'" St: Widen to 5 lanes 1,584,000 150,363,000 98-39 41 1st Ave S: SW 301st St- SW 312m St: Widen to 3 lanes 3,600,000 153,963,000 98-21 42 S 333' St: 8m Ave S - 13'" PI S: Extend 3 lane street 4,752,000 158.715,000 94-17 43 SR 509: 1st Ave S - 21" Ave SW: Widen to 3 lanes 7,200,000 165.915,000 94-22 44 S 336" St: 9"' Ave S - 13'" Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 1,152,000 167.067,000 95-07 45 S 288 ' 5t: SR 99 - Military Rd S: Widen to 5 lanes 1,540,000 168.607,000 98-19 46 S 308' 51: 8m Ave S - 14m Ave S: Install curb, gutter, sidewalks 1584,000 170.191,000 98-26 47 S 320" 51 Iâ! 5'n Ave S: Signalization 200,000 170.391.000 98-29 48 5W 320' 5t (Í]) Iln Ave SW: Signalization 180,000 170.571.000 Project Number 98-28 98-30 98-07 98-20 00-15 93-12 98-31 98-27 00-07 01-03 00-16 92-11 93-07a 98-14 EXH JB IT ---A ~ Map ID 49 50 51 2000 Cost 180,000 180,000 4,840,000 5,082,000 200,000 1,100,000 180,000 180,000 360,000 420,000 750,000 1,540,000 2,200,000 1,400,000 '..189,183,000 Cumulative Totals 170,751,000 170,931,000 175,771,000 180,853,000 181,053,000 182,153,000 182,333,000 182,513,000 182,873,000 183,293,000 184,043,000 185,583,000 187,783,000 189,183,000 .. NON-MOTORI~D CAPITAL PROJECT LIST '. .. . 98-40 63 BPA Trail Phase IV: SW 356" St - City Limits 960,000 960,000 98-39 64 9'" Ave S: S 333'" St- S 348'" St: Widen for bike lanes 3,072,000 4,032,000 98-42 65 SPark & Ride Trail: SR 99 <âJ. 352"" - S 348'" <âJ. 9'": Extend trail 720,000 4,752,000 SUBTOTAL " . 4,752;000 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 6\ 62 Project Descriotjon SW 320th St ((ì) 7th Ave SW: Sie:nalization 10th Ave SW <âJ. SW 334th St: Sie:nalization SW 336th Wy & SW 340th St: 26th Ave SW - Hoyt Rd SW: Widen to 5 lanes S 312th St: I" Ave S - 14th Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes SW Campus Dr ((ì) 19th Ave SW: Modify sie:nal, increase curb return radius SR 509 (jiJ 47th Ave SW: Add turn lanes, realie:n SR 509 SW 356th St (â) 13'" Wy SW/l4'" Ave SW: Signalization I" Wy S <âJ. S 333"' St: Sie:nalization S 348th St ((ì) 9th Ave S: Add 2"d SB left-turn lane SR 509 ((ì) 26th PI SW: Add WB left-turn lane SR 99 (jiJ Spring Valley Montessori School: Add NB left-turn lane SW Campus Dr: I" Ave S - 10'" Ave SW: Widen lanes/sidewalk 21~ Ave SW: SW 312'" St- SW 320th St: Widen to 5 lanes S 288th St: Military Rd S - 1-5: Widen to 5 lanes SUBTOTAL REGIONAL CIP PROJECT LIST . 94-09 I SR 99: S 272"0 St - S 284' St: Add HaV lanes 9,632,000 9,632,000 01-07 2 S 272"0 St ((ì) 1-5: Add 2"0 EB left-turn lane, WB rie:ht-turn lane 6,702,000 16.334,000 00-21 3 1-5: S 320th St- SR 18: Add HOV lanes 40,000,000 56,334,000 00-19 4 1-5: SR 18 - SR 99: Add HOV lanes 60,000,000 116,334,000 02-05 5 51st Ave S (âJ S 316'" St: Signalize 180,000 116,514,000 02-06 6 S 321" St <âJ. 44th Ave S/46th PI S: Signalize 180,000 116,694,000 98-47 7 SR 18 WB ramps <âJ. Weyerhaeuser Wv S: Signalize 400,000 117,094,000 94-20 8 Park & Ride and Transit Center: SR 99 vicinity S 272"d St 10,440,080 127,534,080 94-19 9 Park & Ride and Transit Center: SR 161 vicinity S 356'. St 10,440,080 137,974,160 02-07 10 S 272"d St ((ì) 42"" Ave S: Signalize 180,000 138,154,160 02-08 11 51~ Ave S ((ì) S 296th St: Sie:nalize 180,000 138.334,160 95-31b 12 Military Rd S: S 272"0 St - S star Lk Rd: Widen to 5 lanes 5,544,000 143,878,160 94-18 13 City Center Transit Center 44,000,000 187,878,160 98-44 14 S 320th St: 1-5 - Peasley Canyon Rd: Add HOV lanes 4,032,000 191,910,160 98-49 15 SR 99 <âJ. S 279th St: reconfigure intersection, si!!I1alize 1,260,000 193,170,160 98-50 16 S 288'" St (àJ 51" Ave S: Add WB left-turn lane 360,000 193,530,160 95-18 17 SR 18: W Valley Hwy- Weyerhaeuser Wy S: WB truck climb lane 10,000,000 203.530,160 94-03 18 1-5 <âJ. SR 161: Construct interchange & reconfigure SR 18 interchange 150,000,000 353,530,160 00-24 19 SR 18: 5R 161 - SR 167: Add HOV lanes 50,000,000 403.530, I 60 98-43a 20 Military Rd ((ì) S 272"" St: Add SB and EB ri!!ht-turn lanes 432,000 403.962,160 01-06 21 S 360"' St (éÌ) 28th Ave 5: Add left-turn lanes, sie:nalize 1,440,000 405.402. I 60 98-46 22 S 272"0 5t: 5R 99 - Militarv Rd S: Add HOV lanes 5,040,000 4 I 0.442,160 94-04 23 S 336th Transit Center (S 336'" ((ì) SR 99) 6,464,426 416,906,586 00-22 24 SR 161' Milton Rd S -Military Rd 5: Widen to 5 lanes 25,872,000 442.778,586 95-05 25 S 312'" 5t: Military Rd - 51" Ave S: Extend 5 lane arterial with bike lanes, 13,920,000 456.698.586 sidewalks 95-24 26 S 272"d StÚ' S Star Lk Rd: construct left-turn lane 720,000 457.418.586 95-31 a 27 Military Rd S: 5260'" St - S 272"d St: Widen to 5 lanes 8,078,000 465.496.586 95-26 28 S 320'. 5t :Ú' Military Rd S: Add EB, WB right-turn lanes 432,000 465.928.586 95-28 29 S 316'. 5t Extension to W Valley Hwv: Widen to 5 lanes 18,000,000 483.928.586 98-55 30 5360" 51 SR 161 - 32"" Ave S: Widen t031anes 4,080,000 488.008.586 193,935,000 ~ II TOTAL CITY EXPENDITURES' Table III-19, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - 2009 to 2020 Page 2 EXH JB IT__- ----~ Project Map 2000 Cumulative Number ID Project Description Cost Totals 98-20 31 Militarv Rd S: S 320th St - SR 18: Widen to 3 lanes 6,000,000 494,008,586 95-21 32 Military Rd S: 31~ Ave S - S 320"' St: Widen to 3 lanes 6,720,000 500,728,586 98-60 33 Military Rd S: SR 18 - S 360th St: Widen to 3 lanes 11,520,000 512,248,586 98-61 34 Militarv Rd S: S 360"' St - SR 161: Widen to 3 lanes 11,520,000 523,768,586 98-62 35 Weyerllaeüser Wy S 32"0 Ave South: Military Rd S S 320" St: Extend 3 10,560,000 534,328,586 lane collector 98-51 36 16"' Ave S: S 272"0 St - SR 99: Widen to 3 lanes 2,400,000 536,728,586 98-48 37 S 272"d St: Military Rd S - Lake Fenwick Rd S: Widen to 5 lanes 4,200,000 540,928,586 98-53 38 28"' Ave S/S 349"' St: Weyerhaeuser Wy S - S 360"' St: Widen to 3 lanes 5,940,000 546,868,586 98-52 39 51~ Ave S/S 321~ St: S 288"' St - S Peas lev Canyon Rd: Widen to 3 lanes 15,360,000 562,228,586 96-04 40 S 321~ St (â1 Peasley Canyon Rd: Add left-turn lane 216,000 562,444,586 98-45 41 Peasley Canyon Rd: S 321~ St- W Valley Hwy: Widen to 5 lanes 9,504,000 571,948,586 98-43b 42 S 272"0 St (Zì¡ Military Rd S: Add 2"0 EB, NB left-turn lane 750,000 572,698,586 98-50 43 S 288"' St: 1-5 - 51~ Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 4,368,000 577,066,586 95-54 44 S 328"' St/38"' Ave S/S 334"' St/33"' PI S: Military Rd S - Weyerhaeuser 6,144,000 583,210,586 Wy S: Widen to 3 lanes Suln:OTAL REGIONAL CIPLIST 583,210,586 00-25 00-26 95-31 95-32 95-33 45 46 47 48 49 REGIONAL NON-MOTORIZED PRIORITY PROJECf LIST BPA Trail: Military Rd - 51" Ave S BPA Trail: 1-5 - Military Rd Military Rd S: S 272" St-I-5 Milit RdS:31~AveS-SRI61 S 320 St: 1-5 - W Valle Hw REGIONAL NON-MoTORIZED CIP LIST 2,400,000 2,800,000 352,000 4,864,000 1,536,000 , 11,952,000 2,400,000 5,200,000 5,552,000 10,416,000 11,952,000 ~ TOTAL REGIONAL EXPENDITURES 1:,,~?5,162,586 ~ [I GRAND TOTAL I 789,097,586 ! Table 111-19, Capitallmprovcl11cnt Program (CIP) - 2009 to 2020 Page 3 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM April 27, 2004 To: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe) FROM: Kathy McCI , Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner VIA: David Mos SUBJECT: 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update - Quadrant Site-specific Request, File #02-104263-00 UP MEETING DATE: May 3, 2004 I. BACKGROUND The 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments include four components. The first is the adoption of a Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan, which will replace Chapter 8, Potential Annexation Areas of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). The second is the adoption of language related to a new zoning classification entitled Freeway Commercial, which would apply to both the City and the PAA. The third request is to remove the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street from the comprehensive plan. The last component is the request by Christian Faith Center for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM 3600), and associated development agreement and development plan. This staff report pertains exclusively to the request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendmentto delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, s~own on Map 111-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the FWCP (Exhibit A of Exhibit 1), and to delete this project from Table 111-19 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B of Exhibit 1). Attached are the following: 1. 2. Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 April 14, 2004, Staff Report to Planning Commission with Exhibits A-D April 21, 2004, Planning Commission Minutes II. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY March 20, 2004 Issuance of Determination of Nonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) EXHIBIT B April 5, 2004 End of SEP A Comment Period April 19,2004 End of SEP A Appeal Period April 21,2004 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission May 3, 2004 Presentation to LUTC May 17,204 LUTC Follow-up July 6,2004 City Council Meeting III. SITE-SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE In September 2003, the City received four site-specific requests for changes to comprehensive plan designations and zoning, and one request to delete a future road from the comprehensive plan. The Federal Way City Council held a public hearing "Selection Process" on November 18,2003, on these requests and determined that only the request by Quadrant to delete a future road from the comprehensive plan should go forward for further analysis (Exhibit C of Exhibit 1). The City required the applicant to prepare a traffic study analyzing the effects of deletion of this street from the comprehensive plan. A March 2, 2004, traffic study "S. 320th Street North Parcel: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Analysis" was prepared by The Transpo Group (Exhibit D of Exhibit 1). QUADRANT REQUEST Size: Applicant: Owner: Agent: Request: 02-104263-00 UP 551560-0005, 551560-0010,551560-0015,551560-0020,551560-0026, 551560-0025,551560-0030,551560-0037,551560-0035,551560-0091, and 551560-00901 Weyerhaeuser Way South would be extended from its existing terminus at South 320th Street in a northwesterly direction to the future extension of32nd Avenue South (Exhibit C of Exhibit 1). The Quadrant parcel is approximately 20 acres Wally Costello on behalf of the Quadrant Corporation Weyerhaeuser Company Wally Costello on behalf of the Quadrant Corporation Request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIPD from the Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit A of Exhibit 1) and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B of Exhibit 1). File Number: Parcel No.'s: Location: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Federal Way Office Park and King County Urban Residential I These parcels are the underlying parcels owned by the Quadrant Corporation through which the road extension is planned. Since the alignment of the road is conceptual at this time, there are other unidentified parcels that may also be affected. LandlUse Transportation Committee April 27,2004 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update - Quadrant Site-specific Request Page 2 EXH JB IT Z- b Existing Zoning: Federal Way Office Park (OP) and King County R-4 (Residential, four units per acre) and R-18 (Residential, 18 units per acre). Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: Staff Recommendation: N/A N/A Staff recommended that the request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map 111- 27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the comprehensive plan (Exhibit A of Exhibit 1) and to delete this project from Table 1II-19 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B of Exhibit 1) be approved. IV. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION During the hearing, the Planning Commission asked who would be responsible for extending 32nd Avenue South, and at what time would the extension occur. Traffic Engineer Rick Perez responded that as property on either side of 32nd Avenue South developed, the developer would be responsible for building the half-street adjacent to his or her property. On Map 111-6 of the Comprehensive Plan, the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension is classified as a principal collector. Thirty-second Avenue South is classified as a minor collector from South 320th to South 316th Street and as a principal collector north of South 316th Street. Mr. Perez recommended that if the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension from South 320th Street to South 316th Street was not constructed, then that portion of 32nd Avenue South, which is planned to be a minor collector, should be upgraded to a principal collector. This would ensure a consistent traffic flow on 32nd Avenue South from South 320th northwards. The Planning Commission concurred with Mr. Perez's recommendation and added the following amendments: 1. Map III-5: Upgrade 32nd Avenue South to a principal collector between the planned Weyerhaeuser Way South extension/32nd Avenue intersection and South 320th Street. 2. Map III-6: Revise the same segment of32nd Avenue South from a Type R street to Type 0.2 3. Map 1II-27B: Realign Project 35 from Weyerhaeuser Way extension to 32nd Avenue South 4. Table 1II-19, Regional CIP Project List: Revise description of Map ID 35, replacing "Weyerhaeuser Way SIt with "3200 Ave SIt V. LAND USErrRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE OPTIONS The Committee has the following options: .:k-Recommend that the full Council accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt an ordinance approving the request by Quadrant to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map 1II-27B (2003-2020 1. 2 A Type R street consists of two lanes and on-street parking on either side, whereas a Type 0 street consists of two lanes and bike lanes on either side. Land/Use Transportation Committee April 27, 2004 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update - Quadrant Site-specific Request Page 3 EXHJBrT :B ~ Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit A of Exhibit 1) and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B of Exhibit 1) replacing it with 32od Avenue South and to amend Maps 111-5,111-6, and III- 27B as set forth in Section IV ofthis memorandum. 2. _Recommend that the full Council disapprove the request by resolution, retaining the extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South north of South 320th in the comprehensive plan. VI. COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWCC Article IX, "Process VI Review," any amendments to the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan designations map, or zoning text must be approved by the City Council based on a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Per FWCC Section 22-541, after consideration of the Planning Commission report, and at its discretion holding its own public hearing, the City Council shall by majority vote of its total membership take the following action: 1. 2. 3. 4. Approve the amendments by ordinance; Modify and approve the amendments by ordinance; Disapprove the amendments by resolution; or Refer the amendments back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. If this occurs, the City Council shall specify the time within which the Planning Commission shall report to the City Council on the amendments. ITTEE ACTION: ~-- ~. ~~~~ /' , L ~ ~ Eric Faison, Member Michael Pa r LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit I Exhibit 2 April 14, 2004 Staff Report to Planning Commission with Exhibits A-D April 21, 2004 Planning Commission Minutes K:\Comprehensive Plan\2003\2003 Amendments\LUTC\050304 Staff Report to the LUTC.doc Land/Use Transportation Committee 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update - Quadrant Site-specific Request April 27, 2004 Page 4 EXH~ll EXHIBIT , PAGE , OF---"-- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM April 12,2004 To: John Caulfield, Chair, City of Federal Way Planning Commission FROM: Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: 2003 ,Comprehensive Plan Amendments MEETING DATE: April 21, 2004 I. BACKGROUND Federal Way adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 and updated it in December 1998, December 2000, November 2001, and March 2003. The Growth Management Act (GMA) limits plan updates to no more than once per year except under the following circumstances: (i) The initial adoption of a sub-area plan that does not modify the comprehensive plan policies and designations applicable to the subarea; (ii) The adoption or amendment of a shoreline master program. (iii) The amendment of the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan that occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a county or city budget. Except as otherwise provided above, the governing body shall consider all proposals concurrently so the cumulative effect of the various proposals can be ascertained. However, after appropriate public participation, a county or city may adopt amendments or revisions to its comprehensive plan that conform to this chapter whenever an emergency exists or to resolve an appeal ofa comprehensive plan filed with a growth management hearings board or with the court. II. 2003 COMPREHENS[VE PLAN AMENDMENTS The 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments include three components. The first is a request to remove the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320111 Street. The second is the adoption of a Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan, which will replace Chapter 8, Potential Annexation Areas of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). The third component is the adoption of language related to the adoption of a new zoning classification entitled Freeway Commercial, which would apply to both the City and PAA. Changes to the text of the comprehensive plan are not proposed during this year's update because the seven-year update was completed in March 2003. The intent of the seven-year update was to ensure that the comprehensive plan complies with the key requirements made to the GMA between 1995 and 2001. EXHIBIT I PAGEJ-OF~ This staff report pertains exclusively to the request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320111 Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the FWCP (Exhibit A), and to delete this project from Table III-I 9 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B). The Planning Commission commenced the public hearing on the P AA Subarea Plan and the Freeway Commercial Zone on March 17, 2004, with a continuation to April 7, 2004. They will hold the portion of the public hearing on whether to amend the comprehensive plan to remove the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South on April 21, 2004. III. REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, "Zoning," Article IX, "Process VI Review," establishes a process and criteria for comprehensive plan amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission is as follows: . To review and evaluate the requests for comprehensive plan amendments; . To detennine whether the proposed comprehensive plan amendments meets the criteria provided by FWCC Sections 22-529 and 22-530; and, . To forward a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan amendments. IV. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY March 20, 2004 Issuance of Detennination of Nonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) April 5, 2004 End of SEP A Comment Period April 19,2004 End ofSEPA Appeal Period April 21, 2004 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission v. SITE-SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE In September 2003, the City received four site-specific requests for changes to comprehensive plan designations and zoning, and one request to delete a future road from the comprehensive plan. The Federal Way City Council held a public hearing "Selection Process" on November 18, 2003, on these requests and determined that only the request by Quadrant to delete a future road from the comprehensive plan should go forward for further analysis (Exhibit C). The City required the applicant to prepare a traffic study analyzing the effects of deletion of this street from the comprehensive plan. A March 2, 2004, traffic study "S. 320lh Street North Parcel: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Analysis" was prepared by The Transpo Group (Exhibit D). Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12.2004 Page 2 EXHIBIT- -I P AGEJ-O F----!-L- Quadrant Request Location: 02-104263-00 UP 551560-0005,551560-0010,551560-0015,551560-0020,551560-0026, 551560-0025,551560-0030,551560-0037,551560-0035,551560-0091, and 551560-0090. Weyerhaeuser Way South would be extended from its existing temlinus at South 320th Street in a northwesterly direction to the future extension of32nd Avenue South (Exhibit C). The Quadrant parcel is approximately 20 acres Wally Costello on behalf of the Quadrant Corporation Weyerhaeuser Company Wally Costello on behalf of the Quadrant Corporation Request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit A) and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B). File Number: Parcel No.'s: Size: Applicant: Owner: Agent: Request: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Federal Way Office Park and King County Urban Residential Federal Way Office Park (OP) and King County R-4 (Residential, four units per acre) and R-18 (Residential, 18 units per acre). Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: Public Comments Received: N/A N/A None ANALYSIS Background They applicant submitted an application for a binding site plan (Federal Way File #03-102229-00- SU) and SEPA review (Federal Way File #03-102230-00-SE) for development of an office complex (East Campus North Office) on the parcels shown on Exhibit C in May 2003. The reason for their comprehensive plan amendment request is that the extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South from its existing terminus at South 320lh Street to the future extension of 32nd A venue would divide this parcel. The application for a binding site plan for these parcels has been determined to be incomplete by the City and is therefore on-~old at this time. Neighborhood Characteristics The underlying parcels through which the future road extension is planned are a mix of vacant and single family residential. In addition, the Bonneville Power Administration (BP A) power lines with supporting towers are located in this area. 1 These parcels are the underlying parcels owned by the Quadrant Corporation through which the road extension is planned. Since the alignment of the road is conceptual at this time, there are other unidentified parcels that may also be affected. Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12, 2004 Page 3 EXH'BIT~ PAGE~OF~ There are no structures on the Quadrant parcels and it is difficult to determine whether existing structures on adjacent properties may be affected by a future road extension, since the alignment of the road is conceptual at this time. ENVIRONM ENTAL ANALYSIS Sensitive Areas The underlying Quadrant parcels across which the road is shown in the comprehensive plan have a rolling topography. Slopes vary from zero to eight percent over the majority of the site, with the steepest slope of 15 percent located in the easterly portion of the site. The site is generally mapped as Alderwood soils. There are four on-site wetlands. One wetland is located near the center of the site and the other three are located in the easterly portion of the site. No environmental information is known about the other parcels across which this road would extend. Drainage The underlying Quadrant parcels are vacant. Deletion of the road from the comprehensive plan will not affect drainage. If additional impervious surface is added to any of the parcels in the future through either the road extension or development or redevelopment of the parcels, they will be required to meet the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the 1998 KCSWDM. Access The area through which the future road is planned for is bounded by South 320th Street on the south and 32M Avenue South on the west. Weyerhaeuser Way South is planned to be extended northward from South 320th Street and curve gradually westward to intersect the future extension of 32nd A venue South between the BP A powerline corridor and South 316th Street. Noise Based on a site visit to these parcels, staff observed that these parcels experience noise from both 1-5 and South 320th Street. The extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South would result in additional noise impacts to the existing residences along the alignment. Potential Traffic Impacts If approved, the proposal would delete a planned street from the comprehensive plan. The traffic study (Exhibit D) concluded that no roadway improvements would be needed by 2020 as a result of the proposed action. Although there is no substantial impact associated with the deletion of this road from the comprehensive plan, vehicular delay could be reduced by a minor traffic signal phasing and pavement marking modification at the intersection of South 300th Street and 32nd A venue South. Projections for Population and Employment There are some single-family residences in the area of the planned road extension; however, it is difficult to tell if they would be eliminated, since the road alignment is conceptual at this time. Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12,2004 Page 4 EXHIBIT- I p AGE_-~()F~-I CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE 'pLAN GOALS AND POLICIES Goal or Policy Comments TP I 0, which reads in part, "Protect The deletion of the proposed Weyerhaeuser Way South existing and acquire future right-of- extension to the proposed extension of 32nd A venue South is not way consistent with functional consistent with this policy. However, a traffic study (Exhibit D) classification cross-section (transit, prepared to evaluate the impacts of not constructing this street rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs." on 2020 traffic volumes found that without the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension, the planned 32nd Avenue South extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area. TPl4, which reads, "Provide access The traffic study (Exhibit D) prepared to evaluate the impacts of between major development areas not constructing the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension found identified in the recommended that the planned 32nd Avenue South extension would alternative, while improving business accommodate forecast travel in the study area with the same access and protecting City travel times and approximately the same vehicle miles traveled. neighborhoods." Therefore, access between major development areas would still be provided. TP20, which reads, "Take advantage The future 32nd Avenue South extension would provide an of opportunities to open new road additional route alternative between South 320m Street and connections to create route South 316m Street. In addition, as stated in the traffic study alternatives, especially in areas with (Exhibit D), the planned 32nd Avenue South extension would few access choices." accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area, the same travel times, and approximately the same vehicle nùles traveled. Therefore, the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension is not necessary to create an alternative route in that area. TP21, which reads in part, "Enhance The construction of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension traffic circulation and access with would provide a closer spacing of through streets; however, closer spacing of through streets, with the construction of the 32nd Avenue South extension, it unless geographical constraints do would not necessarily enhance traffic circulation and access. notpennit." CONCLUSION The proposed action does not create quantifiable adverse impacts. In addition, the conclusions of the March 2, 2004, "S. 320lh Street North Parcel: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Analysis," which was prepared by The Transpo Group (Exhibit D), and reviewed and concurred with by the City's Traffic Division, found that no roadway improvements would be needed by 2020 as a result of the proposed deletion of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension from the comprehensive plan. VI. COMPLIANCE WITH FWCC SECTIONS 22-529 AND 22-530 1. Section 22-529. Factors to be Considered in a Comprehensive Plan Amendment The City may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors when considering a proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan: Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12,2004 Page 5 EXHIBIT_. .1 PAGE--1._0F -"-- (1) The effect UpOIl the physical ellvironment. Dcletion of the road from the comprehensive plan is a non-project action and would have no effect on the physical environment. An evaluation of potential impacts to the environment as a result of this non-project action was conducted and a threshold Detennination of Nonsignificance (DNS), pursuant to the SEP A, was issued on March 20, 2004. (2) The effect on open space, streams, and lakes. Deletion of the road from the comprehensive plan is a non-project action and would have no effect on open space, streams, and lakes. (3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. The underlying parcels through which the future road extension is planned are a mix of vacant and single-family residential. In addition, the Bonneville Power Administration (BP A) power lines with supporting towers are located in this area. There are no structures on the Quadrant parcels and it is difficult to detennine whether existing structures on adjacent properties may be affected by a future road extension, since the alignment of the road is conceptual at this time. The Transpo Group's traffic study stated that the planned Weyerhaeuser Way extension would bisect the Quadrant parcel, significantly impacting the development feasibility of the site. (4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities in eluding utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools. The removal of the road from the comprehensive plan is a non-project action. Therefore, the removal of the road from the comprehensive plan would not impact community facilities such as utilities, parks, recreation, and schools. The traffic study (Exhibit D) concluded that the planned 32nd Avenue South extension would acconunodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area either with or without the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. (5) The benefit to tlte I/eighborhood, city, al/d region. There would be no benefit to the neighborhood, City, or region by deleting the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. However, the associated benefit of the road deletion for the City wou Id be the development of the 20-acre Quadrant site as office and the creation of jobs. (6) The qual/tity al/d location of land plal/ned for the proposed lal/d use type and del/sity and the demand for such land. The removal of the road from the comprehensive plan is a non-project action; therefore, this criterion is not applicable. Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12, 2004 Page 6 EXHIBIT__1 PAGE '~)F~I- (7) The current and projected population density in the area. The removal of the road from the comprehensive plan is a non-project action; therefore, this criterion is not applicable. (8) The effect UPOIl other aspects oft/Ie comprehellsive plall. There should not be any adverse impacts on the comprehensive plan as a result of the proposed road deletion from the comprehensive plan. 2. Section 22-530. Criteria for Amending the Comprehensive Plan The City may amend the comprehensive plan only if it finds that: (1) The proposed amendmellt bears a substalltial relatiollship to public health, safety, or welfare Deleting the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension from the comprehensive plan would not affect the public health, safety, or welfare. The construction of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would provide a closer spacing of through streets, however, with the construction of the 32nd Avenue South extension, it would not necessarily enhance traffic circulation and access. In addition; the traffic study (Exhibit D) concluded that the planned 32nd A venue South extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area, either with or without the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. AND (2) Tlte proposed amelldmellt is ill tlte best illterest of the residellts oftlte city. Please see response under (I), above. However, a potential benefit of the road deletion for the City would be the development of the 20-acre Quadrant site and the creation of jobs. (3) Tlte proposed amelldmellt is collsistellt witlt tlte requiremellts of RCW 36. lOA and with tlte portioll of tlte city's adopted plall IIOt affected by tlte amendment. RCW Chapter 36.70A, the Growth Management Act, requires the City of Federal Way to adopt and implement a comprehensive plan and to amend it in a timely manner, but no more than once a year, except under certain circumstances. The City is responding to this mandate by updating the comprehensive plan. The proposed deletion of the road is consistent with the remainder of the comprehensive plan. VII. COMPUANCE WITH FWCC SECTION 22-488(c) (1) The city may approve the application only if it finds that: a. The proposed request is Ùt tlte best interests of the residellts of the city; Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12, 2004 Page 7 EXHIBIT.---l PAGE-1()F-J. The construction of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would provide a closer spacing of through streets. However, with the construction of the 32"d A venue South extension, the extension would not necessarily enhance traffic circulation and access. In addition, the traffic study (Exhibit D) concluded that the planned 32"d A venue South extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area, either with or without the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. Consequently, the deletion of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension from the comprehensive plan should have no effect on residents of the City. However, a potential benefit of the road deletion for the City would be the development of the 20-acre Quadrant site and the creation of joþs. AND b. The proposed request is appropriate because either: i. Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly changed since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed conditions, a change in designation is within the public interest; Since the property was annexed in January 9, 1999, a number of large office buildings and corporate headquarters have been constructed south of South 320111 Street in East Campus. Development of offices on this site is a logical extension for high quality office park development. The Transpo Group's traffic study stated that the planned Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would bisect the parcel, significantly impacting the development feasibility of the site. OR ii. The change in designation will correct a designation that was inapl)"opriate when established. This criterion is not applicable. c. It is collsistent with the comprehensive plan; The following comprehensive plan policies SUPPO11 the future construction of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. TPIO Protect existing and acquire future right-of-way consistent with functional classification cross section (transit, rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs.... TPl4 Provide access between major development areas identified in the recommended alternative, while improving business access and protectlllg City neighborhoods. TP20 Take advantage of °pp0l1unities to open new road connections to create route alternatives, especially in areas with few access choices. Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12,2004 Page 8 EXHIBIT_-1 P AGE ~. ) ~ -~'-'- TP21 Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of through streets, unless geographical constraints do not pennit.... The construction of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would provide a closer spacing of through streets. However, with the construction of the 32nd A venue South extension, it would not necessarily enhance traffic circulation and access. In addition, The Transpo Group Traffic Study (Exhibit D) concluded that the planned 3200 Avenue South extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area, either with or without the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. d. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, in eluding those adopted by referellce from the comprehellsive plall; There are no regulations in FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning," that require street connectivity or specify block perimeter standards. However, Transportation Policy TP21 of the FWCP states, "Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of through streets, unless geographical constraints do not pennit...." AND e. It is collsistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The March 2, 2004, Transpo Group Traffic Study conduded that with the construction of the 32nd Avenue South extension, the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would not be necessary, as it would not enhance traffic circulation and access. Therefore, the deletion of the road from the comprehensive plan would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. (2) The city may approve an application for a quasi-judicial project related rezone only if it finds that: a. b. The criteria ill subsectioll (1) above are met; AND The proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; AND The site plall of the proposed project is desiglled to millimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties ill the im mediate vicinity of the subject property; AND The site plan is desiglled to minimize impacts upon the public services alld utilities. c. d. The request under consideration is for an amendment to the comprehensive plan to delete a road. It is not a project-related rezone, and therefore, the criteria under this section do not apply. VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320111 Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the comprehensive plan (Exhibit A) and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B) be approved. Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12,2004 Page 9 IX. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION EXHIBIT~_.I PAGE---'O~~~ Consistent with the provisions of FWCC Section 22-539, the Planning Commission may take the following actions regarding the proposed comprehensive plan amendment: Recommend to City Council adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment as proposed; 2. Recommend to City Council that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment not be adopted; 3. Forward the proposed comprehensive plan amendment to City Council without a recommendation; or 4. Modify the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and recommend to City Council adoption of the amendment as modified. LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) of the FWCP Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List) of the FWCP Map Showing Conceptual Alignment of Proposed Extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South March 2,2004, Technical Report, "S. 320th Street North Parcel: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Analysis" 1:\2003 Comprehensive Plan\Planning Commission\0421 04 Report to Planning Commision.docl04/ISnO04 I :04 PM Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12,2004 Page 10 . +. Puget Sound /'...- cv... ~ "'" boy #' ....~ ,--*"..----*"" <;) ,~ I I . 1 - f i:i -1' CI1YOF FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2003-2020 REGIONAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT /".;' Federal Way City Limits Potential Annexation Area Street Improvement Projects Non Motorized Improvement Projects // ~ è"~ of' ~ . . Intersection Improvement Project Transit Station Project Map Identification Number @ -c m '"'0 m »X »)( G) :I:~ G) ~ rnõ5,mffi , - r- ~~-1 ~ ,ì \ -SCALE- . - , 1 Inch equals 5,80c.~ 0 ,-.' .. Map prln!~d F~bru~'Y ~3 ~~ Federal Way Table 111-19 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) s 2009 to 2020 EXHIBIT~ PAGE',1 aF-'-'- Project Map 2000 Cumulative Number ID Proiect Description Cost Totals o::'~:i)i::i:,/!: :~. ,',,:;; ',::, ;'.':,.,:::"-::~~:"f'.':¡i~~t~¡;':~"r,;;> ',,:..:,:?~;,;:¡<;~ ",.;!:;,.;.\>':;I,..'i.~:¡':(::~~:>,. ."n,',d"",.,,:,..,. ""CAPITAL PROJECT LIST' ,""""" "~........,.,_...,.~...,. "'" ..,' """,,""'.,. "","""'w.,;:", :_;:~~~:?~1r~~,~-_~', :,.: :~~--,--:.. _.' , ;'i~~~.~~~'~.)'~!;'Y,,'~:::~E~LL::~~_.~- ~:i~. ~ . :";':.:~:_".~!;:i_.."- 96-04 I S 352 St: Sit 99 -. Sit 1(,1: Exlend 3-1ane principal eollectOl, sißn:11 a~ 4066000 4066 ùù' SR 99 " " u 92-21 2 S 336" Sl: 18 ' Ave S - Weyerhaeuser Way S: Widen to 3 lanes 1,200,000 5,266,000 95-17 3 SR 99: S 340" St - S 356'" St: Construct HOV lanes, add WE right-turn 12,096,000 17,362,000 lane, 2nd SB left-turn lane @J 3481h 95-02 4 S 312d> St: 23nJ Ave S -28d> Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 2,856,000 20,218,000 02-01 5 S 320" St @J 1-5: Add HOV lanes on S 320d> St 4,104,000 24,322,000 98-25 6 S 348" St: I" Ave S -91h AveS: Add HOY lanes 5,174,000 29,496,000 98-08 7 S 320" St: I" Ave S -8'" Ave S: Add HOV lanes 5,174,000 34,670,000 01-02 8 S 316'" At (âJ 20'" Ave S: Silmal modifications 100,000 34,770,000 98-05 9 S 324d> St: SR 99 - 23"' Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes, add 3"' WB left-turn 2,200,000 36,970,000 lane @J SR 99 93-09 10 I" Ave S: S 366" St - SR 99: Extend 2-lane road 3,328,000 40,298,000 01-05 II SR 99 @J S 312'" St: Add NB 2nd left-turn lanes 1,680,000 41,978,000 94-24 12 14" Ave S: S 312d> St- S 316'" St: Ring Road extension 4,066,000 46,044,000 93-08 13 S 316" St: SR 99 -II" PI S: ring Road extension 6,160,000 52,204,000 95-03 14 S 312" St: 281h Ave S - Military Rd: Extend 5-lane arterial, interchange @ 23,894,000 76,098,000 1-5 92-20 15 SW 320d> St@J 47'" Ave SW: Signalize 180,000 76,278,000 02-04 16 SR 18 @ SR 161: Add 3nJ SB thru lane, 3nJ SB left-turn lane, 2nd NB right- 1,080,000 77,358,000 turn lane 92-23 17 S 304'" St: SR 99 - 28'" Ave S: Widen to 3 lanes 2,376,000 79,734,000 92-14 18 MilitarY Rd S: S Star Lk Rd - S 288'" St: Widen to 5 lanes 5,280,000 85,014,000 98-01 19 S 304" St IŒ. SR 99: Add left-turn lanes on 304'" 432,000 85,446,000 99-06 20 SR 99 @ S 336'" St: Add 2nd EB and SB left lane, widen 336d, to 5 lanes to 761,000 86,207,000 20d> 00-12 21 S 308d> St: 14d> Ave S 181h Ave S: widen to 3 lanes 1,173,000 87,380,000 00-08 22 SW 336d> StlCarnpus Dr@21"AveSW: Add 2nd LTianes EB, WB, NB, 1,680,000 89,060,000 and SB; add WE right-turn lane 98-15 23 Military Rd S: S 288'" St - 1-5 (S): Widen to 5 lanes 14,280,000 103,340,000 00-09 24 SW 320" St: 21" Ave SW - 26'" Ave SW: Signal modifications and 100,000 103,440,000 interconnect 97-01 25 SW Campus Dr & SW 3401h St: 10d, Ave SW - Hoyt Rd SW: Signal 210,000 103,650,000 coordination 00-02 26 S 312" St IŒ. 28d> Ave S: Add SB right-turn lane 120,000 103,770,000 98-34 27 SW 320.' St (âJ 21" Ave SW: Add 2nd WB left-turn lane 720,000 104,490,000 98-32 28 13"' PI S: S 330" St - S 336" St: Extend 3 lane collector 3,024,000 107,514,000 98-17 29 S Star Lk Rd: S 272'" St - Military Rd S: Widen to 3 lanes 1,280,000 108,794,000 98-23 30 47'" Ave SW: SR 509 - SW 320d, St: Widen to 3 lanes 1,600,000 -110,394,000 93-O7c 31 21" Ave SW: SW 344" St- SW 356'" St: Widen to 5 lanes 1,875,000 112,269,000 98-13 32 SW 344" St & 35'" Ave SW: 21" Ave SW - SW 3401h SI: Bike lanes, 2,620,000 114,889,000 sidewalks 94-10 33 SR 509: I" Ave S - SR 99: Widen to 3 lanes 8,000,000 122,889,000 94-11 34 S 308' St: 5'" PI S-8' AveS: Extend 2-lane street 1,440,000 124,329,000 98-18 35 28"' Ave S/S 317" St: S 304" St - 23"' Ave S: Widen to 3 lanes 4,200,000 128,529,000 98-57 36 SR 509: 30'" Ave SW - 47'" Ave SW: Widen to 3 lanes 6,400,000 134,929,000 98-58 37 SR 509: 47'" Ave SW - West Citv Limits: Widen to 3 lanes 6,400,000 141,329,000 00-10 38 SW 330' St @J I" Ave S: Signal modifications, extend NB left-turn lane 250,000 141,579,000 98-24 39 Hoyt Rd SW: SW 320" St - SW 340d, Sl: Widen to 3 lanes 7,200,000 148,779,000 92-22 40 I" AveS: S 348.' St-S 356 'St: Widen t051anes 1,584,000 150,363,000 98-39 41 I" AveS: SW 301" St-SW 312d, St: Widen to 3 lanes 3,600,000 153,963,000 98-21 42 S 333"' St: 8' Ave S - 13 'PI S: Extend 3 lane street 4,752,000 158,715,000 94-17 43 SR509: I" AveS-21" AveSW: Wident031anes 7,200,000 165,915,000 94-22 44 S 336" 5t: 9' Ave S - 13'" Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 1,152,000 167,067,000 95-07 45 S 288 ' St: SR 99 - MilitarY Rd S: Widen to 5 lanes 1,540,000 168,607,000 EXHiBi1 PA.GE .8-ú-L \- 3 I EXHIBIT I P AGE -', ~ F: ~-I~ Projcct Map 2000 Cumulativc Numbcr ID Projcct Dcscription Cost Totals 98-19 46 S 308"' St: 8th Avc S - 14"' Ave S: Install curb, gutter, sidcwalks 1584,000 170,191,000 98-26 47 S 320"' Sl (oJ 5"' Ave S: Signalization 200,000 170,391,000 98-29 48 SW 320"' St!]i) Ilh Ave SW: Signalization 180,000 170,571,000 98-28 49 SW 320"' St!]i) 7"' Ave SW: Signalization 180,000 170,751,000 98-30 50 10'AveSW!]i)SW334 'St:Signalization 180,000 170,931,000 98-07 51 SW 336" Wy & SW 340" St: 26'" Ave SW -- 110)1 Rd SW: Widen to 5 4,840,000 175,771,000 lanes 98-20 52 S 312"' St: I" Ave S -- 14 ' Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 5,082,000 180,853,000 00-15 53 SW Campus Dr@ 19"' Ave SW: Modify signal, increase curb return 200,000 181,053,000 radius 93-12 54 SR 509 (0) 47"' Ave SW: Add turn lanes, realign SR 509 I, I 00,000 182,153,000 98-31 55 SW 356"' St (íJ) 13"' Wy SWIl4 'Avc SW: Signalization 180,000 182,333,000 98-27 56 1" Wy S (m S 333«1 St: Signalization 180,000 182,513,000 00-07 57 S 348 ' St <2V. 9" Ave S: Add 2"" S8 left-turn lane 360,000 182,873,000 01-03 58 SR 509 @, 26" PI SW: Add WB left-turn lane 420,000 183,293,000 00-16 59 SR 99 (íJ) Spring Valley Montessori School: Add NB left-turn lane 750,000 184,043,000 92-11 60 SW Campus Dr: I" Ave S - 10'" Ave SW: Widen lanes/sidewalk 1,540,000 185,583,000 93-O7a 61 21" Ave SW: SW 312" St- SW 320" St: Widen to 5 lanes 2,200,000 187,783,000 98-14 62 S 28~: S. Mml"')'. Rd S - 1-5, Wid," '05"",~ --~ ~~,'UO~ 189!~83,OQQ- SUBTOTAL - 189,183,000 ------------- - ---=~-~~=-~-- ------------=,~ ---------- - 63 64 65 --960,000- , 4,032,000 4,752,000 l2~~!AL_~~TY!~~~E~~)JTUR~S -- ~~. :~~-~--:--~~9!~~ . ,"'." REGIONAL CIP PROJECT LIST 94-09 I SR 99: S 272"" St - S 284'" St: Add HOV lanes 9,632,000 9,632,000 01-07 2 S 272"" St (íJ) 1-5: Add 2"" EB left-turn lane, WB right-turn lane 6,702,000 16,334,000 00-21 3 1-5: S 320 'St- SR 18: Add HOV lanes 40,000,000 56,334,000 00-19 4 1-5: SR \8 -SR 99: Add HOV lanes 60,000,000 116,334,000 02-05 5 51"AveS(íJ)S316'St:Signalize 180,000 116,514,000 02-06 6 S 321" St (a) 44' Ave S/46"' PI S: Signalize 180,000 116,694,000 98-47 7 SR 18 WB ramps (a) Weyerhaeuser Wy S: Signalize- -- 400,000 117,094,000 94-20 S Park & Ride and Transit Center: SR 99 vicinity S 272'~ 10,440,080 127,534,OSO 94-19 9 Park & Ride and Transit Center: SR 161 vicinity S 356'h St 10,440,080 137,974,160 02-07 10 S 272"" St (íJ) 42"" Ave S: Signalize 180,000 138,154,160 02-08 II 51" Ave S (a) S 296 ' St: Signalize 180,000 138,334,160 95-31b 12 Military Rd S: S 272'"j St - S star Lk Rd Widen to 5 lanes 5,544,000 143,878,160 94-18 13 City Center Transit Center 44,000,000 187,878,160 98-44 14 S 320d, Sl: 1-5 - Peasley Canyon Rd: Add IIOV lancs 4,032,000 191,910,160 98-4<) 15 SR 99 (àj S 279'1. St: reconfìgure intersection, signalize 1,260,000 193,170,160 <)S-50 1(, S 28Sd, St(,,) 51" Ave S: Add WB left-turn lane ---- 360,000 193,530,160 95-18 17 SR 18: W Valley IIwy - Weyerhaeuser Wy S: WB truck climb lane 10,000,000 203,530,160 94-03 18 1-5 @, SR 161: Construct interchange & reconfì~lIfe SR 18 interchanoe 150,000,000 353,530,160 00-24 19 SR 18: SR 1(,1 -SR 167: Add IIOV lanes 50,000,000 403,530,160 98-43a 20 Military Rd @ S 272"" St: Add SB and lOB right-tun! lanes 432,000 403,962,160 01-06 21 S 360d, 5t (a) 28d, Ave S: Add left-turn lanes, signalize 1,440,000 405,402,160 EXHIBIT S--eLL PA-GE - 2. '~:__1.' EXHIBIT__t PAGE ! JII~) J=~ Project Map 2000 Cumulative Number ID Project Description Cost Totals 98-46 22 S 272"" St: SR 99 - Military Rd S Add I faV lanes 5,040,000 410,442,160 94-04 23 5 336"' Transit Center (5 336"' @J SR 99) 6,464,426 416,906,.sJ£ 00~22 24 SR 161: Milton Rd 5 - Military Rd S Widen to 5 lanes 25,872,000 442,778,586 95-05 25 S 312"' SI Military Rd - 51 SI Ave 5: Extend 5 lane arterial witli bike 13,920,000 456,698,586 lanes, sidewalks 95-24 26 S 272od St@J S Star Lk Rd: construct left~tum lane 720,000 457,418,586 95-31a 27 Military Rd S: S 260 ' St - S 272"" SI Widen to 5 lanes 8,078,000 465,496,586 95~26 28 S 320 'St @! Military Rd S: Add E13, W13 rioht~tum lanes 432,000 465,928,586 95~28 29 S 316 'St Extension to W Valley I1I1'Y: Widen to 5 lanes 18,000,000 483,928,586 98-55 30 S 360 ' St: SR 161 - 32od Ave S: Widen to 3 lanes 4,080,000 488,008,586 98~20 31 Military Rd S: S 320"' St- SR 18 Widen to 3 lanes 6,000,000 494,008,586 95-21 32 Military Rd S: 31" Ave S - S 320" 51 Widen to 3 lanes 6,720,000 500,728,586 98-60 33 Military Rd S: SR 18 - S 360"' SI: Widen to 3 lanes 11,520,000 512,248,586 98-61 34 Military Rd S: S 360 ' St - SR 161: Widen to 3 lanes 11,520,000 523,768,586 9~ ~ WeY<3fhacu5ff-W~;-M il j !afy-Rd-ò-S-J2~'" -St--IòK {end-J-!ane-c~¡ le-{; ~ Of ~~ 531,328,586 98-51 36 16'" Ave S: S 272"" St - SR 99: Widen to 3 lanes 2,400,000 536,728,586 98-48 37 S 272M SI Military Rd S - Lake Fenwick Rd S: Widen to 5 lanes 4,200;000 540,928,586 98-53 38 28"' Ave S/S 349'" St: Weyerhaeuser Wy S - S 360" St: Widen to 3 lanes 5,940,000 546,868,586 98-52 39 51" Ave S/S 321" 51 S 288"' St - S Peasley Canyon Rd: Widen to 3 lanes 15,360,000 562,228,586 96-04 40 S 321" St @J Peasley Canyon Rd: Add left-tul11 lane 216,000 562,444,586 98-45 41 Peasley Canyon Rd: 5 321" St - W Valley Hwy: Widen to 5 lanes 9,504,000 571,948,586 98-43b 42 S 272M St @! Military Rd S: Add 2M E13, N13 left-tUI11 lane 750,000 572,698,586 98-50 43 S 288'" SI 1-5 - 51" Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 4,368,000 577,066,586 95-54 44 S 328' Stl38"' Ave S/S 334"' Stl33ro PI S: Military Rd S - Weyerhaeuser 6,144,000 583,210,586 Wy S: Widen to 3 lanes .'i;, .; ;i';;~;.~;) .. .co~::)!t; -'- ~~~~riP~ '.. I' PRIORITY 2,400,000 5,200,000 5,552,000 10,416,000 11,952,000 00-25 00-26 95-31 95-32 95-33 45 46 47 48 49 BPA Trail: Military Rd - 51" Ave S BPA Trail: [-5 - Military Rd Military Rd S: S 272 St - [-5 Military Rd S: 31" Ave S -SR 161 5 320 ' St: 1-5 - W Valle 11\ SUBTOTAL REGIONAL NON-MoTORIZED CIP LIST 1l,952,OOO TOT AL REGIONAL EXPENDITURES 595,162,586 r~RAND TOTAL -------.. =~~ EXH! B ~-f PAGE 3 8JLL 3 RS7.2 s; 57.2 . g Õ A -c m, -em »x »X G)I G):E m- m (jj I ~ ~ Q~ -- , '. " ~ )' , . '-;,~, I '~ .. !! .... I~~ ~,I." 'I ..~ ' . I , " '~.' ~"".o",'",,~ a: 2003/1' ',' 'c' , ' "1'-- ' "",. . // City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan 2003 SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLA.N DESIGNATION CHANGES Quadrant Existing Designation: Comprehensive Plan: Office Park CF I Zoning: OP CC - Legend: Wetlands I/) J!! ;S V? f5 I- ;;:; ~, R.H ~\ . /."-'Î._~..,.. (KC) 1, :;~~i~,e~;:L!fLTY LIMI "'~fi': r~R' :r;~,;:: ,:' ":',{~~t" .-,-., , ,-' -",""--"'&---'ø' ..; -:---,- ',:::::i:- _:~:~-~;/-~ ~ :~-~'\'~ :~:! :~f Þ.í¡~ . - ~~,)w, ,:.'~,..-""" Steep Slopes Site Specific Request 0 (KG) OP-1'" Proposed Action: Elimination of Weyerhaeuser Way extension north of S 320tl' :," OP-~ . 1..?p-r_lL. '::'~'~'S-?' ~ ",,"" -'n~'_"""~-'- __i~ M' ,,' . c" 'pc' Li",: ..-...--' - ,.......,......'- ¡ .." ~ .....--.. . .. ... .. .:e ~ ~, ~ -- ~ <'1"'.~ .u, "-~,; ,~' "'~.' ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~' ~, ~ ~ .~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ., ~ ~ ,~~ l " \j (it~ / '" , , . .'.., iø . if-I i' i ' . ~!~1~1])~tf': Rick PC'r('/" PT, City of federal Way Michael Swenson, P,L, P.T.O.E 02282.00 Wally CostC'llo, Quadrant Tasha Atchison, P.E" ThC' Transpo Group S 320" Street North Parcel: WC'ycrhaeuscr Way Extension Analysis Tlw !JlIIj10:'" of dll:; tnhlllcl] Il1CIJ)!L:l1duI1l i:, 10 pI"Sellt Ihe results of the allalyses perfoIIlIcd t(j n':dll;[tc thl' Jll1p:1ct of e]lIl1in;[tillg tllC planned \'\\'ycrhaeuser \\lay C"tCIl:;IOIl, frolJ) :; 32(/' :;Ireel to ¡\veI111e, This :¡¡1ah'sis has been prepared in support of thc «)Jnjlll'hul:.IIT j11:111 :¡¡11l'!1dll1C111 ulITe!1tly IC(juc:;¡ed b\' (Juadiant. The IJ)eth,)d( ]( ),1',\ SUIT, 11IIHI1[1,:'. thc:,,' :lIul\::c:; \\'cr,' U '()IdlIuted 111 ;[(1I":1I1CC \\'1th Clly of ¡:cdn:t! \\la\' sufi III ;1 I )lc"lnl)('! :ZIII I', 111l'1110LIIHllII1J. TI1!()ul,h c!(Jse (oo¡dll1atl()!1 , ,. ;¡¡ld «)' 'pCI:ltl! III \\1[11 (,It\ :.!:IIL 'j'I:111"!") lItl]I/"'! till' a]1])1( l\'l'd !1Kt!J, )d()logy to arrivc at dw Il'Sll][S j1ITSl'l1tU! ]Ierell\. Background \ ]):111 (If ¡!Jlll «JI11]Hl')¡"bl\' ]11::11, li)l' (:1(\ (,I I ",kI:I! \\'ay ILls prC\î()llsly Idcl1li[¡ed Ii IOIlg Llngc 1111j)'O\TnKl1t PIOJCct dul \\'(Jl¡]d n:lcnd \Vn'cIh:lcusc¡ \Vay north fro111 Its UIITl'l11 tlïl11lllll:; :11 :-;,\:21( :;(ll'el I' J Ihe fUlure e"I,'I1SI< )11 of ,-\\'el111e S, ThIs extel1SiOll of\Vcycrh;¡cuscr \\';¡y would di\,ide the S 320dl Street North Parcel that Qu;¡dr:ll1t Corpor;¡tion Ius PI" )P( );;,'d f()r de\'cloplJ1cl1t. ¡\ '¡'ral1sport:l!iol1 ltnpact ,\I1:111':;j-; (1'1\) \\:1:; co'J1pkt,d hI Tl:llbpO III ;\h\ :J(lU,\ for this p()poscd dClcl°IJll11'111 111!(':;POll I" (,1(\ ,O[111111'11IS !C,i',:lrdlllg ¡)¡e '1'],\, (Ju:idL\l1t IS pursuil1g :1 (OIllprchcl1sÌI'c phi] ;¡111('11I11I1CI11 tlLlI \\'ould C]llllIl1:\te thc subject c"tcl1:;iol1 of \Vc\'lïlun¡,;cr \\';1) :-;, This :;tud\, S:III:;!ICS till' ('11\': !C'llIlr"1ll'l1ts for;¡ col11prl'hcl1S1lT phl1 1\l11CI1<l11cnt 1r()«':;:; 1"'- "1;1]11:11111)', fUIIII( 1',':11 ',( l'lUII' J;, \11111 :llld wltl¡out thc \\'c1'e!h:lcusc! \V;¡y C>:tl'lhIOII, dn hlolb !C)',-lldlll,I', tI)(' ¡II1PIO\"Cll1lïl( l:I[1 I", 1¡¡:llk :IS to lIS 11l'C('SSlIy al1d hlïlCI[( 1\1)(,111):11:111(c<I :1:',:1111'.1 thc ([11IUCi': to :tllntnlJrO1lïtIC:;, Study Methodology TII!(ill,I"ltC')\)I<Illl:ltIII11\\III)( 11\"-1.III,IIIII<':,III,I\111t'ï',l(![1)11';I\CI('I<!CI1ttllnlfol :111:I! 11)(',( 1111<'1,('(tlll[1 ,11('I)\II<'\«III)!,,'¡il":CIIII),I:II¡"'¡l'lII)\tlll'1'>!l'l1t1:11 C>,1<'lhllill(' \\'('$ïll:lnl',(1 \\:1\ \\'!('II (ill',lrl,ïl[I,:',I!)(' «)I1::t[11r III ill ,dllC\\'!o:ld s,it 1:, C()IIIIII'ill IILI! thc :¡<I):1r ('lIt lJ;\u!kl :U!CIl:lt, :lll' n:t!¡L¡(nl. Î'IIl' stud\, 111l':1 tIlI<'I:;cCllrJI1:: 1IIlllllic EXHIBIT ~ PAGE-'--OF -- .. 1'The TrJl1spo Group 11130 1W:!> (W',iflll(' rJ I ,~;lIil(' CIJ$ f<lfkl.lllrl, W^ ~JI\03~ 71/0 ~/:'¡i/13GG:) Fax 4/5,825,8434 § ~ ~ ~ I ,... ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -Ot, ~. 4 . ,,'~l~ i! "; '-'r~~ t¡;. . 28'h Avenue S/S 312'h Street . 3Td Avenue S/S 312th Street . Military Road S/S 312th Street . 25th Avenue S/S 320th Street . 1-5 SB Ramps/S 320th Street EXHIBIT_' PAGE~_~~)F~J I-5 NB Ramps/S 320'h Street 32nd Avenue S/S 320'h Street Weyerhaeuser Wy S/S 320'h St Military Road S/S 320'h Street . . . . 111e City of Federal Way provided their 2000 and 2020 forecast emme/2 traffic modeling networks for use in developing the future PM peak hour traffic volumes. The original 2020 model provided by the City di_d not include the \X1eyerhaeuser Way extension. Transpo revised the 2020 model to include the planned extension. Thus two model scenarios were developed, one with the planned Weyerhaeuser Way extension and one without the planned Weyerhaeuser Way extension. Further modifications were made to the City's travel demand model for both alternatives at the Interstate 5 (1-5) ramps to/from S 320th Street to allow left turns from the ramps onto S 320th Street. These turning movements are currently permitted. However, the City's 2020 model has assumed left-turn restrictions. There are no future improvements that indicate that such restrictions will be in place in the future. City staff concurred with these revisions to the model coding. For both scenarios, without and with the \X1eyerhaeuser Way extension, 2000 turning movement volumes were subtracted from the 2020 model volumes to arrive at 20 year forecast grOWtll in traffic volumes for each turning movement. Prior to adding the 20 year growth to the existing turning movements, adjustments to the 20-year groWtll were made to account for tlle year in which each existing traffic count was conducted. Existing traffic counts at the study intersections were conducted in either 2002 or 2004. By adding tlle difference in tlle two models to existing traffic counts, the forecast results are calibrated to real-world conditions. Furdlennore, dús medlOdology furdler accounts for slúfts in traffic dlat result from planned inlprovements, such as the S 312th Street extension. T1ús is a common post process modeling procedure that reduces the effects of known modeling deficiencies and limitations. The above procedures were followed for bodl scenarios (with and widlOut dle Weyerhaeuser Way extension). Traffic volumes along S 320th Street were balanced between intersections. The resulting traf[¡c volumes widlOut the Weyerhaeuser Way extension are shown in Figure 1 [or the weekday PM peak hour, while Figure 2 shows dle traffic volumes with the Weyerhaeuser \X!ay extension. ~ t' EXHIBIT --.D.ili PAGE~9f --'1 The Transpo Group - DRAFT- lfî\ S312THST I \.:..) MllfT MY RD S I 260 I 524 ~l~ I ~l ! 292) 4...ü I I 2<.J1) I 3~~~ (~~ I' ~~~ (;;7 I 217t I ~t~ I ~ ~ ! ~t L~~__---!~-~ --_.l_--~-__~__~l_____- ~61- - 6 101 I 400 -'t'- 94 ) 4... 152 1,866- -1,821 1,493- I 32t (31 638t ~t~ 49 65 --------__~___l_- 20 600 I 52n - -'t~ 4... 157 -1,404 1,112- -1,063 , (274 9O1t ~ ~ 615 371 f1\ S 312TH ST \!J 28TH AVE S í2' S 312TH ST \!:.J 32NO AVE S t:\S320THST ~ 25TH AVE S CD ~5~~ f6\S320THST \V 1-5 N6 RAMPS EXHIBIT_- I II . PAGE_- ' .. tt 't-~OT TO SCN-E 5EA T AC /"IALL if) uJ ~ 0 a:: c<> <" 5 312TH 5T if) ~ :r: I-' C> C'-I en w > 4: :r: I- co C'-I en w > 4: 0 Z C'-I M 5 320TH ST S 324TH 5T 0 S 320TH 5T @ 5 320TH 5T 05 320TH 5T 32NO AVE 5 WFr'ER!W:USER W'( S MllfTMY RD 5 48 28 256 58 l177 121 l86 150 l215 -' '- -' '- -' '- 245) 4...112 26) 4...17 103) 4... 32<.J 1,142- -950 1,094 - -145 1,1&1- -762 96t (6 211t (2n 215t (234 ~t~ ~tr-- ~tr-- 212 12 201 302 123 78 60 5 126 ~ Figure 1 2020 Traffic Volumes Without Weyerhaeuser Extension S 320th Street North Parcel: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension EXHIBIT ~ PAGE3-0F ..15- 1œ '-0. T raf!SP 0 Gtip M="J2'D22821GrnphicslgraphicO2 <A> 6randooM 02126104 07:59 . . . . . . . . . . . . II . . . te t8 . . . ft fD ~ . . . to !D . It . .. S I . . . . , " , t (;\ S 312TH ST I '0 I r:;'\ S 312TH 51 ~ 28TH AVE S 11 2 ~2~~~~ I\V MILfTMYROS 265! i ~91 269 127 i ¡, 241 I .-/t'--! !.-I 2!¥J) ~ 46 ! ! 300) I 394- -458! 276- -m i l 58 ') (100 ¡ 216 ') ( 121 ' 201 ') ~t~ ~ ~ ~t 52 72 ! 194 223 . 292 L___G4__-- --- L_...__-------- L____~S3 S 3121H S1 en w > « I l- e "" en w > « I I- 0:> <"'-' S 320TH ST SEATAC M.AJ..l if) W ~ 0 0:: ~ S 324TH ST 0 S 320m ST 0 S 320m ST 0 S 320TH ST 32NO AVE S WEYERHAEUSER W( S MILIT MY RO S 48 115 260 59 I 20 861175 150 l 202 .-/ '-- .-/ '-- .-I '-- 2'()) ~ 20 17 ) ~31 103) ~307 1,132- -935 1,057- -759 1,167- -m 96') (16 138') (259 21S') (236 ~tr- ~t~ ~t~ 223 60 126 253 127 n ~ 9S 123 t¡\S320lliST \:2J 25TH AVE S f5\ S 320m ST \V 1-5 sa RAMPS 20 627 I 520 .-/t'-- ~ 159 I -1,0581 I I I f6\ S 32OTH Sf \::.) 1-5 NB RAMPS 6 99 I 399 .-If'-- 94 ) ~ 152 1,873 - -1,836 1,485- I 32 t ( 31 652 t I ~( I 49 65 ----_J 8 -1,392 1,104- (274 901 ') ~ ~ 608 3&4 .. :'-, 1 N . NOT TO SCALE .~-'- -.. ./" ~ EXHIBIT Jl.& PAGE--f-OF~ I~ Figure 2 ?! 2020 Traffic Volumes With Weyerhaeuser Extension , I S 320th ,Street North Parcel: . Weyerhaeuser Way Extension M:V}~2282\GC3¡Jhics1gl3phicO2 <8> &aodooM 02/26104 08:00 1œ Tra~o GrŒ"4J ,. .. .. . .. .. .- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 ~ ~ 8(0 .. ~ ~ ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ , ~ . 0 ~ ~ a- P ?é ~ ... ~- ' I " , '.( ! -,' i 18> &fa Evaluation Criteria and Results Through coordination '.vith City staff, Ùuee measures of effectiveness were identifIed for analysis to determine the effect of the \V'cycrhaeuscr Way extension upon traffic operations in ùIe'area, '¡lIe selected measures of effectiveness iqclude: study intersection level of service (LOS), corridor travel time on \V'eyerhaeuser \V'ay and 32od A venue S, and vehicle miles traveled (V1\1'I) as determined I~y the City's traffic model. Intersection Operations The City of Federal Way provided their 5ynchro network for usc with d1e S 320'h Street North Parcel TIA. This Synchro network was revised to include future city projects in dIe immediate area that were also considered in dIc development of dIe future 2020 traffic forecasts. These improvements include: . The extension of 3Td Avenue S, from S 320'1, Street to S 312'h Street . The extension of S 312'1, Sueet from 28'1, A venue S to Military Road S (across Interstate 5) . Improvements to S 320'1, Street including a sevcn lane section. City staff provided specific dctails of projected future channelization at the study intersections that arc affected by ùIese improvements, as well as various . "" l111prOVel11ents to eXIStIng intersectIons. Level of service (LOS) analyses was conducted for dIe 2020 wiÙlOut extension and wiùI cxtcnsion scenarios using ÙIese improvement assumptions. Traffic signal cycle lengùIs were preserved as provided by ùIe Synchro file (120 seconds), but Ù1e signal splits and offsets were optinùzed in d1e 2020 WiÙlOut extension scenario and held constant for ÙIe 2020 wiùI extension scenario. By holding ÙIe timings constant, an equal comparison can be drawn between the rcsults to isolate the effect of the extension on traffìc operations. Table 1 summarizes the LOS results with and WiÙlOut the \V'eycrhaeuser \V'ay extension. 5ynchro LOS sheets arc provided in ¡\ttachment J\. EXHIBIT J2.b PAGELOF --S5 . \ qA" The Transpo Group - DRAFT- page 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1;~ ~ -,..<10",,'" ~,~'~ ~ ~ ~ .. p'rt "w I:: \i l.) ; L- /'\, ¡ I, ...,- . , ,~ 1= at. ),-~ ¡ ! f~Þc(?~F ,~, 1 able.' 1 ~' -',- ¡ ß'%í:¡;' 'P.f\ ~~'fFm=T?iT ?Jfi'Zif f' 'r¡': [T:.~ ri';¡ ~);<.~; t Ji ~ ~ f r~;r¡jJ~ I:.~,..,.,.".".,.L",~"""""",<.LI "",_...,',a.,>""-~-':""'rft',,"~" I: ~::".:~~.:\,.ùd~ii..';:~:-:.:: ..:L ';1 ~~~.~:D, i!..}~ ~ ~~:';'~;Yt:lllii¥~~ ~~~;!~~ f~~f1 ~, ~j~r~ ':,11 : I) ,II"'" " 1 I ¡ (! :~'! 21 3 0,90 i) II,' ) I! ',II d' I ( I"fl I:, I ti 238 N [J Left t,ÎlllldlY 1':Ud .j I ( C ;>'1,9 !! li <'\' 1 0,78 l C 24,2 336 0,74 0,89 )')"f\veIllF: \,'; 320' Sueet 332 30,2 0,89 ,"SI,I:?'llIp¡",320"Slled c c 0 ¡ 'i 09'i c c 31.1 20,1 0.96 0.74 ') fW l,alTlp/', 370' Sllcel 20,3 JÎ'! f"venIF' c" ,ÎU Suc!'t c c ;>S,-1 O,GC) c c 28,2 23,7 0,61 0,61 \','"".elll,IC IJ :,'y/S 'PO 'il 'I') ) /" ¡ 0 (,C) t.1i1IL'If'( Fo!!() ", L'U' Sl:(!et c. 279 oc,s c 275 0.68 !~'~!CL' ?~'~ !\~~!~~f; ç:;~;/ "~\. ~r~E~Tr ~~ ~~~:;F..~:j;:z:-r ?~"~'~:::C~~[~~:T~:~~1~~~~ 'I, I:' ;:1:11 ,'j""I" II,il,,¡'I'I(¡I"I! ':('j)J(II(IIn!¡')())I'J:I\,'lttLC):; (,II"',:II'!!I' ()! I Ill' "lilli" II\l'()¡'I!il'lllll('èJlIlh Jllil'hl',II,'II'"IClll:¡]!\II1CIC;]SC111 ()\l'l:lIIt!,I.!\ 1111!1< "1\\,' '111'I'll"ll\\:I" !':"llI] ):ìSll'lI:1I1", 111('!:lJg,'S¡dCCI(';\s(' II] :1\CI:I,I',l' d,'I:I" :I', :1 II ',1I11 "I,lh(' \\'C\'('lh:IClISl'l \VII\ ,",Il'll¡iilJll \\11S ()IJIJd to bc at S )]:::,<1, :;11('I'I/\ltlll:!l" 1"':1,1, \\I]](h dnî,':lsn1 In ;lj)PII)\111UI('h I snl>lHI PCI"C!llC!c. !)('U'l':ISl" 111 \,(,ltlllll' I" C11J,I(111 utili (V/(:) (I(Clll :11 ()1I1 ()(tlll' CI,I,,¡t Slgl1l¡]1/cd Sllld\ll1lll,nll,,11 d'I('I,'IIi< \\"\l'lI1,I('IIS('1 \\:11 1':,1l'lbl<¡JI 111('llltl'lSl'CIIOI1So(')2",1 ,\\"ll('/.~ »)(1" ~~lllll .llld \\ ,lnh:l(,lIsn \\ill/:;):::'I)' :;II,TI lilT 1111P:I,tcd by thc J1()s[ l1Ildl'l ,,¡11l'1 ,,11('1)1:11111' dll" II) II$, 1(':bSI,I',IIIJll'I1II>1 Il:ill')c ;IIHII¡(' lI1lpl\ct 1111d :I';'iI,I',I]lll"]II,,I,\ 111:1)"l'CII"II"lllldl'lllllll'l :"'('IUII" ¡'Ill' I(",II¡ "j li1< ,111.1,,',1 11:,11, ,II<' Ilu\ I Ill' \\'('\ l'l 11,1111',(1 \\ ,II l"',lllbl()l] ¡)l(n'lelcs 1IIIIIInll"IIIIII' 1""\'!.IIIIII1l'I',nll()ll"IH'I:lII()IJ'.:IIIIIl':;llldl IllI""l'IIII)I1S, I I1CI('IISCS :11111,1",1,,1,1' IllII,I,11 !)II\\IIIIIIIl'I\\')',,(II.III<)',:II(,\$)llllll;IJII',"""jdC!:tI't!UI 1\1'11111, II 1:I,III,I,!,II"I',!IIIII,Io>\"I'IIII!I'I,IIIIIIo>11 1IIIIIwlll1()!C, )(':'!,II!lIIIII,¡jI< ""lilll"II"\\,,lillll'J!IIII]liCI!lIII1<'illl ,II"<"Î>1:'!'¡('lc\('I~\\'II¡Olit Ilw\V('\('II:I(II,,"\\:II('¡.:II'II',¡,'11 Corridor I rave! lime ^rlalysis I i:,III)', II(' ,1111' 1¡1:,/""lilclIllll"I1:"I',I'Î)llllnlllllll<'llll","!111I111,()~'I""lIl1s,II;I\'e'l 1111](' 1]¡1'1Jl!',III!1I' :III,'! Il,d 111)111] ¡:lllllllllllll(' Willi :lIld \\IIII"II! ¡]¡" \\','\'crl1:I('1I:;CI \\lII\, l'i':ll,J'.IIIII\\,I',',II<liI:lll'Il '¡(IIIIII'lltlll)lII![ld,IIIII',IIIIIIII)lIIIIIIIII:I\",111IIIC:;\\'('!(' (':,11I11:11('(11!l1:1 1<IlI!C I"')',IIIIIIII:'/!'II"III,I', ')()II 1('('1 ',IIIII!I "j \Vq("]¡;\"lISC! \V:I", 11I1d EXHIBIT ~ PAGE~OF -»- II", ",\11"1'" (,lilliI' lilUd I ~ .. '8 .. .. ~ .,. .. ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ -8 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ .. . . ~ ~ ~ 'E:t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 , , , ~ EXHIBIT_- , PAGE-1I..~)F ~ ending/beginning 500 feet south of S 312'h Street. In the scenario '\vill:out the Weyerhaeuser Way extension, vehicles would travel on Weyerhaeuser Way, S 320th Street, and 32"d Avenue S. With the Weyerhaeuser Way extension, vehicles would bypass S 320th Street and travel on Weyerhaeuser Way direcùy to 32nd Avenue S. A traffic signal was assumed to be constructed at the 32"0 Avenue S/Weyerhaeuser Way extension intersection, and is included in the with extension scenario travel time calculations. . Running time for the scenarios is expected to be approximately the same for each alternative since Ù1e posted speed and distance traveled is essentially the same for each scenario. These running times were then added to turning movement delay experienced at each intersection along the travel route. The delay estimates utilized were consistent with the Synchrv model outputs utilized for the intersection LOS calculations. A third, mitigated scenario was added for evaluation in the travel time analyses to demonstrate a potential mitigation measure that would noticeably reduce travel time in the without Weyerhaeuser Way extension scenario. Based on information provided by the City, the south leg of the 32nd Avenue S/S 320th Street intersections is configured with a left-turn lane and a left-thru lane. This configuration and traffic volumes would require operating the traffic signal with split phasing. Split phasing is generally considered less than desirable phasing method as it results in less efficient signal operations. Therefore, the third scenario assumes the south leg would operate with a left-turn and a thru-right and Ù1e signal would be operated with more efficient phasing. The benefits of eliminating such phasing from the future plans for this traffic signal are shown in Table 2, along with the unmitigated scenarios. A detailed sununary of the travel time data is shown in Attachment B. Table 2 "-"""""""-"-"'F"'"""."~"""'.'.'--""-"',--- ~WIih~Wêy¿rhá~ò;~Ewäy: ~éñStot1': """""~':';'.O'.û '~,:-;';,~',"'>;'_J.. c- ,;:,;"'~',~<;.-",I" . . '. Bii?1mI ~ _1mmI IEliDIIIiiIiDI em œ.œIB .. "'~.r--i'~"""'~-'\;"'E~"~-f='r"""""~"'~r'l'.l;'.,-~'m':'I. ,-,~w-"~1!.1'. ~~~. . . ~.,. ~":1>,\,,"; 'Nórtlllfóuntl~<¡;;¡::1;!,:: ,'~'~'f~~~Üjl.~"ØiJ;.i:lf3~IH:f¡:; ,r~t3.4....QX.f~f; 1:~~~:5Q:~t:n %,,:~8P:8.~h..:~ ~f,}}?J~~~,~ .. ':.'ð9:9..~'~':p¡. ~.7.,.:t!?¡1(¡ "~J:J ~(1.;6:f.";'..' --~-""""--"-"""....."'«"' """"""""",_""""<,:_"..."y,..>'",,,._..,,-.:.,-~..,,, .""..~<:..,.....................;<",...""",. .""...."",...... .:.,r;,..",..=~.."...,~..._.. ~iiL~,~;:,~ ¡~L~~o>~,iî::,~~ [t~.Lf~r!¡ K ::Iit~~.:,;;} ~~::~@~21i: ~[~ErÚX~ r;i~J.Ú~ï~~ ~J>.~?]~ ~ruJ]~ ~t~iliÉ ~ EXHIBIT-1u.I :, PAGE'::z-OF ~ page 7 E ~ "" ~ ... fit ... 4 .. '" ~ '" ift .. ~ .':! ~ 1 4 1 ~ ~ 4 .. ... IIIEt '$ ~ .. 4 -I ~ .. ~ ~ . ~ .;,,¡.. ... :. t':J . .". ~ ~?! ;,;. "'..' EXHIBIT' PAGE».J~~ As is shown in Table 2, the travel time comparison between the with and uOßÚtigated without Weyerhaeuser Way extension scenarios shows that the Weyerhaeuser Way extension provides travel time savings for vehicles traveling both north and south along the selected route. Northbound, it accounts for a savings of only 10 seconds per vehicle, while in the southbound direction it accounts for approximately 30 seconds of travel time savings per vehicle during the PM peak hour. However, if the City's proposed split phasing at 32nd Avenue S/S 320th Street is replaced widl protected north/south phasing, the difference between the with and widlOut Weyerhaeuser Way extension scenarios is cut in half. In the northbound direction, a vehicle would save approximately 6 seconds of travel time with the extension, and about 14 seconds in the southbound direction with the extension, when compared to the without extension alternative. As was noted previously, in the mitigated without extension scenario, the northbound leg of the 32nd Avenue S/S 320m Street intersection would be converted to provide a single left turn lane to allow for protected north/ south left tum phasing at the intersection. In order to further understand the effects of these changes among the mitigated and unmitigated scenarios, the previous LOS analyses were revised to address the proposed mitigation measures. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 3. Also shown in Table 3 are the results of the queuing analyses. The queuing analysis was conducted using Synchro 5.0 and focused primarily on the northbound left-turn movement only. Table 3 .... .. Ii~~~ œ~ ~J~1It ~ - - - mI- ~~~ffjJ æ.œ EDI mm 111mB - - ~ ~ Table 3 shows dlat eliminating the northbound left-dill! hne and related split phasing (leaving a single northbound left tum lane) slightly improves the overall intersection LOS as well as reducing dle average dehy for the movement by approximately 4 seconds per vehicle. TIle largest positive impact is on the delay would occur on the soudlbound approach, which explains dle improved southbound tra~el time. TIle 95th percentile queue increases by approximately 50 feet with the single. northbound left turn lane. Based on dlese results, it appears that the mitigated option does not subsuntiallyaffect the northbound approach at 3200 Avenue S/S 320th Street, thereby EXHIBIT ~.' PAGE--H-OF ~ ..v..... I. .. ,. The Transpo Group . . . . . , , , . . . . ~ . . . . l' ~ , . . , ~ . t , , t ~ . . , t , \ , t , , , , \ (1 ". ~t "' EXHIBIT-- .--- . PAGE alt. <I i~-uL allowing the mitigated scenario without ~e extension to remain a highly plausible alternative. Vehicle Miles Traveled - System/Circulation Impacts As discussed, City staff requested a system measure focusing on travel time or travel distance under each alternative. In response to this request Transpo utilized the 2020 models developed for each of the alternatives. Since there is not set standard for this measure, this information is presented for infonnational purposes only. A sub-area was created from the large model that included the links within the study area previously identified. It extended from S 312th Street to the north, S 320'h Street to the South, Military Road to the east, and 25th Avenue to the west. Vehicle miles traveled (VM1) equal the number of vehicles on each link, multiplied by the link length. The VMT with the Weyerhaeuser Way extension was found to be 5,470 miles. Without the extension, the VMT was 5,376. As noted, there is less VMT without the new roadway. In general these results are similar. Relative to the size of the City's model being utilized for this analysis, the planned extension is minimal. As a result, the model may not be refined enough to provide realistic data. The infonnation presented does indicate that the change in VMT would be minor. Benefit/Cost Analysis As noted previously, the planned Weyerhaeuser Way extension would bisect the north parcel property, significantly impacting the development feasibility of the site. To help understand the economic impacts of the Weyerhaeuser Way eXtension, the travel time benefits as noted above were reviewed and put in the context of an economic impact. Based on information provided by Quadrant, the extension of Weyerhaeuser Way would result in a $1.5 to 2.5 million negative economic impact to the project. llis figure includes the additional costs of a road to full city arterial standards as well as the loss in development potential for the site. Based on a total savings of20 seconds for approximately 2221 vehicles during the PM peak hour, for botll tlle northbound and soutllbound travel times and a cost of $1.5 to 2.5 million. llis equates to a cost per vehicle (PM peak hour) between $6,757 and $11,261. llis comparison illustrates tlut the potential benefits of the Weyerhaeuser Way extension are greatly surpassed by tlle cost implications of constructing tlle roadway. Summary This study evaluated LOS, travel tinle, VMT, and a cost/benefit analysis of the planned Weyerhaeuser Way extension between S 320'h Street and 32nd Avenue. Based on tlle analyses detailed in this memorandum, Transpo has found the following information to be true: I Reflects sh:1fts in background traffic, plus site traffic that would likely utiliz~~~n ~ '.... t of the Weyedlj1.cuser Way extension. I;An I g II -J-.l...!!..' 0\ PAGE-L.OF -a3.5- The Transpo Group page 9 = .. . ... .. -tt ~ ... .. .. ~ ~ ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ 1 .. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~" ~ ~ t . <.~ " ", ,~ í "ö" - ~' ".. f~""~..<.:- '" . EXHIBIT___1 PAGE-U-OF-U-- 'I1le Weyerhaeuser Way extension would provide little to no benefit to overall intersection operations at the nine study intersections Excluding site related traffic, the extension would attract approximately 180 additional PM peak hour trips PM peak hoUt operations w~uld remain at LOS C throughout the study area with or without the roadway extension. TIle Weyerhaeuser Way extension would decrease northbound and soutllbound travel t::irr1es for vehicles traveling between Weyerhaeuser Way and the planned 32nd A venue S roadway by a total of 20 seconds (NB and SB) per vehicle. A comparison of VMT between alternatives indicates less VMT (1.7 percent) without the roadway extension. Although the model may not be refined to a detail to provide a truly accurate measurement on such a small scale, the minor change confinns the minimal impacts previously shown with respect to intersection LOS and corridor travel times. When considering the economic impacts and the average travel time savings, the cost equates to between $6,757 and $11,261. Thus, the cost of the planned extension is not proportional to the project impacts assuming no extension of \X1eyerhaeuser Way. . . . . . TIle proposed Weyerhaeuser Way extension is anticipated to provide nominal benefit tlnt would be unapparent to tlle average driver. Withouttlle Weyerhaeuser Way extension, the planned 32nd Avenue S extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially tIle same operating conditions within the study area; the same travel times, and the approximately the same VMT. Therefore, the results indicate that the Weyerhaeuser Way extension would be redundant. M:\O2\O2282\Comp Plan wuncndmanl\O2282ml-WWEdoc ~ ~ EXHIBIT 1) d I PAGEJ1LOF --15- The Transpo Group page 10 .tT I ' EXH I B :, -- - PAGE_Å.");~.Jlt kt .. ~ t. ~ ~ ~ I .. ~ I ~ .I Þl' ~ I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ) 1 I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ;'- ~ ~" ! Attachment A: Synchro LOS Worksheets ,- ""EXHIBIT.J2..£--, . PAGE-/LOF ~ . '~~OqO~QqqQOQQa~~~.~~~ø~~~~~ø..~~~..~~...... ~ 135: S 312 St &28 AvS ;) 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemeeu.er Way Ex1en!lon Study 135:S312St&28AvS ;) 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuser Way Ex1en.lon Study - .( - 4.... .( - 4.... ~ t I" ~ + ~:; M:1O2\O2282\Comp Plan emmendmantlSynchro12020 with Weyer Ext...y6 2116/04 Page 3 Me\'\! men Imlt'lW~~l\ffi\I:I:II;'a;¡¡ I: I:I'¡~ I:! ~rï.tvy I:I41U.W1:I,U;¡¡IY 1:!t(~>iJ\ N 1:!1.."i~ N 1:I1\W&1'I ~¡~i1;:;l:!lm~ 1:I,111'iI:I::>1:!ft LaneConfigurellonst ,'"I' "'I ,,1> ,',','1."1>",; . ~~JID§ð(j7:;f 9~iiftl":9'CrO~@!}.~~ Lane dth 1 1 12 12 11 12, 12 11 12 12 11 12 G, ra(e~, J~, ,,' "A:n"",",'>,,',t'4t~, ,:(", ~!",~'.'a, ',~, _",ii,' Xl:", .-!!,.',~,~,.,H,., %,'" .,~~"ir~, 'V1PJ:r:~,;,r,':;);;,'1%",1(*,~'7'"~;~,,',,,~, ',ú.,f~_"~""',i1 Ì"õi¡¡rCosrtlme(š)"" 5.0 . 5~0 ,ß "-5..0" 5.0"S:Ó-' 5,Ò 5,0 ' ." 5,O""'5~Õ ,"'" ~¡¡.kØt[~F!ìC!O~ì\$¿~t:\1!O~óð~<1:0'0;;,~J¡O~,,¡Qg~~.OO' , ,1,öOl}~!f¡¡;~':~;w.0'œ:0u.2~.t11 F,pb,pedlbikèì' , 1:00 1.ÕÒ~' -, 1,001.00' 0.96'~,OO 0,99' (00 Ö,98 , ~èFJ)5~J!~5!1!~~'!J~¡~JJm~Æ:..¡t;~!I~:9:!mmm~:w:~, go' " ! ',00 ;.".~f¡,:ì.~~ip:~.~~..~~ Fit 1.00 0.98 1.00 1,00 0.85 1,CO 092 1.00 0.92 fJEt~l~tea.,¡:;¡'¡;\,I;~\¡jj,t1iÐi),9,i!J._599fg*¡i#Æ¡¡m:o:!rS;'Œ!~,1,i!JO1~'»'.oJr..:', 9 5' "1 :OO~:¡;'?!:70!g?j;$;!¡t)Qi2..~ SaId. Flow (prot) 1721 1722 1738 1783 1509 1751 '530 1746 1625 -~tf!¡QBt.w,¡!¡~uy~gt!m~,~b:';I:f.iÜ1'¥iOi~'1?':1""1Oo~f!it1~~tJl~u:23' 1 :00~1'f;~',;r:'~:e7f~;r,~7¡11;p). Satd. Flow (penTI) 730 1722 748 1783 1509 417 1630 1231 1625 [~~J!ì'&1(YÞJ1_~~9;Q_~~~~~I",99~1';15,8;~8i1í~\ 52. . ;64¡è1;¡j';72:;;"J',t@~~28~,~2.~~ Pesk.hourfector. PHF . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 ~,OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ð:.~tì!;¡!5t:.'!Ij~Q }~~~-~~~,!l~:5 z: '~'.:. TB:1~7 ~;¡l>'!~~ e~~ Lane Group Flow (vph) 290 452 0 100 458 48 52 136 0 27 534 0 Ç;o'I:!O~~8~(fI/f)f)?¡'5¡¡~<jì~:H.JJii\œ\lU~..1ilU"JU&.'f;,q~~U ~1<lP{l\.?~J u~-ID ~O~ì U~Ç"t,1 u, Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm It.t6I ~ ~ ~.!~~~~~~.m;¡f'1if~~A~~~;;['~~~'~~~~J~¡' 5jt~"41 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 8 ~~3;'tF~¡;2:j'Q ~2'J . 0 A<1.IJ ~¡" "J7' 2<.' ..'f"?&.'Ji"r~7~ Ê1ï&êtive"örêeñ.õ(Sj--~'24:O-'-2tô"'-""" ~-24:Ö">" 24'6""411. 'itt" 1~:i" " 18'2 ,."", "'~"";'8:~l8:i~~ ~_~_e.l,,!.\.\:L.- ' '~ '....8 13:e..IOø.1'!,~itJ.:~~D;;;0~35i;¡:~~~¡;¥~!~~3.~~1 Cleal'8nce Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 ð.O 8.0 6.0 6.0 ~I ell!'¡ CX!en! IOn ¡(I ¡~.:¡ uJt/m'¿ iU~_~"1>E!'2íðmi121O_¡o~~OMi,1ffi2; o:!'t'mfir,~~~¡~ Lene Grp Cop (vph) 336 792 344 820 694 145 568 ~29 567 ~~ ~~Çi~~O~2.~i4i,O;O g.z.~ vis RetioPerm cO.40 0.13 0.03 0.12 0.02 ~ ~,IIU,9jf~U,i!!.~\;>'£!1"PiJ"ìm¡\J,,]I'$0i1~~.q¡OZ'¡~¡,w;O ,36 i~~9!2~Ji');.ï!!¡,y,u:o:e~'2! u.;Ii ~~ Uniform De'ey, d1' 12.6 10.3 8.8 10.2 7.9 12.7 12.1 11.3 18.5 ~,s.~!P !lJ1¡,!!P.!S'~~J*.il~Ifß¡i~t!Q:o:mX~¡¡ç9_Q:9~iJ.t'r1T~~§;!JI';r,CYO~ Increments' Delay, d2 19.2 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 23.9 p..m¡(!)~ "'Jk!lAìi!i!J{QI~it.~"Q];91q¡z,'l~~~~g;;k1: 2¡~~~-W:~.w.~ Leve' of Service C B A B A B B B D ðI1~ t'b II en! u8, IIý¿t!¡~~~-~~ii.'Ì~I1Q¡g.~~¡_ït,~:¡'!2i~¡it.Xq¡t1f~N~t'!!'Æ?~1 Approech LOS B B B D mt8Qð CI ~ m WY~~~A1IM"'¡~t~1.Wii:l..'l>'<lmm~¡'jI¡OOá~~.)J ",~~,'%;¡¡'¡'1 ¡¡ It~~ HCM Average Control Delay 21.3 HCM Level of SeMce C ' ~lll!!teJl.. o.l¡'¡1P~~.!)WJJ R~fg\lA~J¥ìlí¡;¡iA.~¡\¡¡Æ;'~:D;&~~ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 52.2 Sum of lo.t time (s) 10.0 !!JL~~~l(;.R pI! c.1IYJ,Ð.!!!! ;S!!Q!1"-.;;,lt3j ß j1¿~'~\)jg"'!!.v.i! 110 (ts.~t:'l ~~fli';¡:.~~'!1!i c Critical Lene Group ... .. m ro '~ ", ~ ~ M:\02102282IComp PIon ammendmentlSynchro12020 with Weyer Ex1"syß .. 't' V1~ '-"Oel4 i ¡¡a}}tf;~!:~~ l:!,ltI!>YVI:! ~VYI:!,f¡l¡!¡WI:IKMJ':'I ~¡r:; ¡S;~;>I:I C',!m~ l:I'¡j1¡m1!i.~~~ Lene Group Flow (vph) 290 ~52 100 458 48 52 136 27 534 Q Q ð\J. H,en g1IJ'~ [\ ~ s:4)1:,."k', U 2?lf\~12ó'!,~Mqz;""'S;~\1ro11!;'i:;Hj'J!~:!il'f!5 ~~:~~(! ""'¡!§¡r¡:;}~I~~¡~ Òûêue l.ëñO~(ií) ~21ë"'~Tf6 ,A'~9"""'1'Š{1¡"""~5«'""'4Îf"""'i1 " #31:'t ., g"".~ ,'" ,.." IIImI'I'iV!'mi'ik'I.JJ$¡(n¡¡ìÌ'~í~f£ ""'12~~1'8""""'-'~""'-""-~t!'~.,~~ g¡¡ìii'(jp"¡§¡~"'timê ('AI) ""~b*,'. ',...J;;",'Jih'O1dUii&,,&' '.H,;r;k':.,;r;"".:P;,~;I.ft;;'¡'~,Wml¡,J;';:\..%"=ìUi";" .. ~~Bloe~.~lilJ:¡.¡¡;¡)~""l""é.~~'t""';7.".n¡;¡i'P"""'!:í"i!'t.-~.. "'~""'Æ<J¡V"...Gt~~,.~,,¡;,; ~ê"¡Ÿ'LenOrh (Fi)'" "" ~,;~::t,.,.,rp'."'Wi'>7'i8t'j'a;);¡¡;>.,, ;:,-,,;,.,,'t:,'.w:,,"'..,~o'\~';;;;';:,,1><ji!f ,Vi, ,.",i,\%¡,w'",.,MJ., "', L, ,';', !5IJ I n ¡ B ~. B I ~e ~~~ '~;~~í1~""", ',iR'I:~'.'I::~ ¡~"':'þ" ~:¡'.fu"~_~EII 95thBÎy "i!îcX:k Time 'AI" h'i;;"'~""1i't"n1;,:.t"""m,~;:;.:",¡." .;)¡;ý\i"f,\""""..J;""t.~',,;;-_, , ",.M ".' " " ".. . 9!!.~ J!j, al~ ~QI.!ID~~~;;;~W~~j,i1i~¡¡;¡~~!i?¡,i¡~~i<t::.1::~TI',)¡ù.~t'i~~~.~t!oJ 1111 II('! ecQ9 rt.~ rn ~ -m¡.Jò';.¡.--'\!t,¡1Jt.~"t~'\i!!ß¡mN!¡\ _>I!_'!,¡íIIMm¡M¡JIif,mm-)~'1I m~ ~!l1t~:!ttJL~.!f!ø:.~~~,Ç! ~d.!J~ p!ì.(~¡tJ'X.t¡ U!o.àfm ay, beiJ1!.riQ àr~X;i¡;~,,'¡~¡~:'¥¡;~¡~-~~~' \,/U..,8 shown I.mexlmum slter two eye's., ~m C»< m:C ~~ 0 ~I~ THETRALVl3-FF51 THETRALVL3-FF51 .. ", ,;. r~~"QOQ~Qqooaaaq~~_~~~~8~~~~~..~~...~~...... 219: S 320 St &. Gateway Blvd S ~ ð-~ ./ ..,., t \. + 219: 5 320 51 &. Gateway Blvd 5 (f.~>rì .J; ~: ~ 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeu!er Way Extension Study 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeu!er Way Exten!lon Study - (': - f +- '- ~ t ~ \. + ¡(';. ¡¡a l)ð ,UlPUPJ:lw._~rui'm4>.t; Es !.~J: f::; 1~,1V'{1: ~ '4' t1.Iì\1€..r,w~, N t:I, I ~¡;; t:ru.Th'lii ¡;; f:: ,Wø.""'lfjfm!!'¡¡¡,i',í'!H~~m~'Jj Lane Group Flow (vph) 94 1905 31 1988 49 73 399 105 R!J !G...a.Wèn a ~ (!J.Œ~m~irt\t¡~.~ 1.'it~';!.~'Z:' ;;;1~1~t~JJ~~~,,'f.f¡m'E¡'1:1i~\j"!~~~É«?\ Queue Length 95th (It) #139 548 m53 11638 53 35 11488 39 ~1('¡é' .,,:0, ¡¡ 1.!3',~-'- 311'011':" !;~,""'50'4% ~!Ì'!1§i!¡ì)T<;1I5S S'I'1'.'1i!!1iJ\íìYI'i¡~f¡'}¡¡~ ooihûPèiõðtf~e"(%)""';>""-- -;,..,"".,¡¡æ.~<'~Š,%",;"";",,,;< _.,.A.'.', !.',i..,.". "1M,. ."",. .. ...., , ' 9 5 tn'IJ"p~.'i)~';PY";<#;8 6%')W~"',).{;~ ~, %'Mzf~~'Ç'S'E'iT';*_!¡i'%,iì;!l~;\\¥Ø~.i~'fli~l! " Ì'~BIIy Length (It) -.. ~5Ò~ ,. ._, 50' ,,',. i5" ., .. 'foo"""" ,'<.." ..... .' -~~I' ~i!T~"1$5ZW'),,;';!f!~""'t1.t~2~""""'~"""~lß!'(¡$>"w*~,~ ~'~~~Jf~-'/.?ièó%'~'g:f'Á" ;\O~Á t3'i'i;¡"'"'<!';~\;""'Y;"53'x"~,"\,'¥;¥¡\'J, -';"'.",;" ""..". ..... ;< ~~..9! [g¡¡¡:,~~J1)-~S ~~z,:"~S.6~~~~ !t;¥3¡¡_~¡~m;¡A~~~\; In! ~m !KY~~~ ~~~d~~¡~&'i~~!Wit~!g"!JM...¡¡¡¡¡¡¡{I(~~--m\~ ~ ~~~t~ê~ lam~~í<~~,dJ!¡t~ ÞJ!~tW£:ì 11. 6:0. ~,r1! ax¡ þ~;1~!1 ~ ~Ç;tj,îj¡iit~~t~_-'$;~ Queue shown Is maximum after two cycIe!- . ~b../!1.ði.~'i!.~l\k ~ ~~~ ~ 1àTq~ùe]Tð'J~Tìîf~~}:!¡þXiíþ9 t(éí!rii~i9h-a r;r:Ui%1ìû!;¡i;m:';~~~K1!:+t\H¡¡Øi¡~i~~;+: ~'ov"-~f>'1~"~'~"" t:t!~t:I:!'~ '~v,:!œ\'f.'WI::I.¡¡,.¡\.Wf::f;{~~¡NBti¡'¡1.t{Nf:: rl.?:r.Nf::f;{,:.¡r,.:;¡f::U\!,"~t:I ¡;w;:,~ ,~m Q>< m:I: ~~ 0 ÞI; L.M Con'gur.~'c~!'1 ...~¡. 'I tt~ .'1 ,.. ¡. . " ',' " 'I, ' 10 '. r~Œ.~(V5f1"5') f;!J. ',., 19~~.~!'9~~¥~oo;'IJ£19ÖÔ~~C.tgOö,,:;t 900;31~~'f!!~~ LaneWc~" 12 12 12 .2 12 12 11 11 12 11 11 12 ~~ae:e {~)¡¡~..::"~;:;;;;;;~;N,"1p.;2~,:r. '," .C'~'" ~~~:A"Z%~"1m¡~'~~'!~~ ~~ TOIal Lc!t li!':'!e (s) 5.0 5,0 50 5,0 5,0 5.0 5,0 5.0 t:~;1c,;U~~:.(ií~cr*~~"~"OO,i::7.:::.91;::..: c.',: ~~ .~':¡':'T'-O1!Yir~-;~'Ìt~~;"1-;öb':~1~¡11$~~JQ!J~!,W~~~~ Frob, øed.~;~e! 1.00 1.00 1.:0 1.00 1.00 0,97 1.00 0,97 ~~~'5T!ëe~;:;~i:~f:.C9..i~.;1,OO,;:','.i:; .::' ':::f:C'O 7:~~q;':l'ttg,i\~(),~s;;;;;m'OO!:~~,ð;¡¡!,~1.¡0C).¡Î\~ F... 1.00 1.00 ',C:J 0.99 1.00 0,87 1.00 0,86 F::Pro:e<:'.~(!;. '.,.,,' \T,~~iJ.S5,:\:.~:OO...;' ~.,.-~;:O:~5 ,. ~:~I;}I6,Ij':1i¡¡¡¡)í'ð:g'5;,..,::1;'OO:~&"1'\J~O,¡~.,*1"'.oo;;t~¡'i~t Se~iì. Flow (p¡:è:)'" ", '1752"49:9""'" ~;P5 50ii' """"1309 1181 . . "1616' 1541' .. ~'.!fJ~ëf~ediB~:-:-:"J!'.;o..9;S...1;1;oð1.-;:;:;¡~é ~'-'O:95 -. 1 :~OI~F:;;f;OÔ3Þi:1¿;,Tq?;~g~¡oq;:¡:~~ Sa~d. Flow (Del':"".) 1752 ~9C9 .795 5077 949 1181 1207 1541 ~OIur1".a (v:)l1U>.:,;,'!'~~"':'.~'(.c~Rto1..8~~t!: ~,32 "",'" 31" ~ e~:ítfij.52~~({49;ri';.t!i;8:;í::,i65S:~399.~e.1tí~ PeA~'~ou~fac~or.PHF 1,00 1,00 1.0:> 1.00 ~.:>O 1.00 1.00 1.001,00.1.00 1.00 1.00 ~::F)c~(V"..~);.1.':;;':~;:, '{>!I'I.'¡j) BÌ.J .';i~' 3'27:3':"~ ~ e~f~2}'i.ß~¿i~1:~:;::::~~a~G~;œ39\1,~"~_íWiJ LaneG'OupFIOW(vp") 94 19:J5 0 3~ '968 0 49 73 0 399 105 0 C'ði'i,~<'.~"!-'~I~::;:"~1°,¡"3!<.,.u~~,;.,~fO-::,:"!:0 .":' .;1I),¡,~g;o~1~t'ijï;¡:j:O.~~fo:R'l;o,~~.,.I.!~.CJ, "eavyV.~lc!e! ("') 2% 2~~ 2'~ 1% 1% 1% 30% 30% 30% 0% 0% 0% !!üd;D:5ëIc~51'~7'"".~', ~,U'-.\'o\i'" ~"'ìFr. "":!"O' :". '1P~e',;;;'i10":".~""i 0 'W1'716"~ð~,O.~~u ";'um ì.,...e Pro! ?rOI Perm Perm ~:eclê'<l"?~lìm()<";1:~11:~~2.~:::-:::"':";1':" ¡6~~~~1i,'5~;:¡;1~~a\j:a!!Çšf$~~;¡¡',Mf.~ Pern'li:!ed P!>ese! 4 S ~!I:~~,c;j:e~~...G~(! JOC'" ~,2,B;>IC5.7..'~~;¡o.,¡::...í.,.. ;::, .A.g r.4,I(i~B~Qì,~~3p¿.:_1."9Æ"4.9.:~~JI El'.ec:!va Gree~. g (!) 11.6 57.9 3.5 49.9 39.5 39.5 39.5 39.5 E"CF..D l!!=', Q~;;;~!!; .9J'Æ'i~:. 9,,11,J~ ,~(ti!f::"""" . C: ~~ 0 ,1~~I,J)ßv'!\o.;:¡^4.!š~~!Jé~$.~g\3!.'i&~~ Clearance Time (!) 4.0 5.0 ~.o 5,0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 ~en!IO~'(!)~!;:::;:2:0F:~;12.0:-"': '1'.',.~.. [O-:7-,'2¡(]ØW¡~~2(OR2'!'ö;Æ~~~2iO:li'V.Z:~ Lene Gr;¡CaD (v:-.h) 1i5 2~50 56 2184 323 402 411 525 ~ ¡, Vb:I'~~ ;~,!c!;. \:'i:.,. O:O~:39Y!"J~.~O2' ~.cC ;39{;!.~;::",,0. 06~;,ik;~~~ vi! Ratio Perm 0.05 cO.33 V!imi'Jo;-'~'<Ih'-;;:¡'P"::'r~;¡.:)4c.'J.,u" S.",:"."",," '.--C:S5 ,0' O:9~~D,~c-Jf5'ri.'OTts~~~om~~ U~¡iõrm Õ~lay, d'i" .. ~Ú iÚ""-' ." 55.~ 31.'0 26:6' "2è,9 ,,' '~37.'7 i7.1'~ ~~lö~~~r,¡:~....;I~1;o,~.IJV~'; ,,(.;:, ~ :C3ì 'o:B'2~~7?\;1:oo{",y.';¡;;;i~:'f'.~Ul~WQ~ 'ecre",en:eIDe'.y.d2 1.6 2.5 6.0 6,5 0,1 0,1 38.5 0.1 ~sJ-;'\~~,~. 5'..2!m26~:.v!,.,.,:;6:r2 ',' 32iO;.~~:_~2ß'q'7'727:0;,:,~!'f:P>!1W,~:~~ Level c'. SeMce D C E C C C E C .AWb.'.cI).Dërftÿ'T!)",;:';!:;.~1;"~lr~n~ ',~~ ~-"~ 32:5:%'f~1il'.~!)¡t;: - 26.9. ;.;t;\",¡;;f.'i%;~84:.c;mE Approach LOS C C C ";¡!~:¡':,,,..'., HCM Average Control Delay 33,8 HCM Level of Service fp;..@I.,¡.VOl !1!n.e¡íbl¡;~ PJ! ~i!tl ~'jft,u is "~~~*'. f,~~1f~-~ Ac\uatêdéyclÙërÏòíh(S)"~ 116:Ó. Su'; of 10!t Ume (!) ~ ".., 10,Ó' '-' 1!11ers.a,C!lð1!J¡.¡!!p~$J,~Jfätl<?DJí¥i¡;¡¡\\j,I'.£~a~Ætti~~;.11!t1CU;rzexe1.:i5f4~é'Iÿf~,!" ' c Cr1t1cal Lane Group M:\O2\O2282\Comp Plan emmendmantlSynchrol2020 with Weyer Ext..!y6 211 8104 Page 5 M:\02\02282\Comp Plan ammendmantlSynchro\2020 with Weyer Ext..sy6 THETRALVL3-FF51 Page S ~J ~-" , ,r~ ~ r THETRALVL3-FF51 , . ~ " ~ D ø ~ ~ f7 ( ð ø ð ð " " tJ " ~ I) ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~, '~ " ~. ,j' ,).t ~ i' ,J ¡' ~ ~ .~----- (" .- '-. ¡ ..' 220: S 320 St 8. 1.5 sa. 320 Ramp :;f.: 4 ê) 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study 220: 5 320 5t & 1.5 sa . 320 Ram[) 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension WeyerMeuser Way Exlenslon Study - ê) (" .- 4.... ~ t ~ "" + .,.I. Mn e~p~;lt:I,¡:~ï,~~t:I ¡,~~t:I,~.~ !Jrnj,(:) t:I,l~ ~'~m~~m~~H¡ Lane Group Flow (vph) 1485 852 274 1392 263 277 627 SV!.I?~ld..ðJ:I~~)~~~~~~~2!5Øi~1=2J3f1ßf¡t\7'~~~X&~{¡ìi:iful'~¡jf~_~¡m.~~~ Queue Length 95th (1\) 93 m176 157 156 286 302 179 rm..em.~ ~J:!}i_~~~¡;~.çt;:J~~~t.'ìi~~ 2;2Ä;J;1I'JI~$T.1J!iJ.;:¡;'~tf.",,1Jjt~~t@M$~;I{ì1.r(;!~I%i.~~~_~~Ui1i4~1 50th Up BlOCk TIme (%) g § !!\1fJ ¡l'B ! m~~~~t\i.%:;'.~~}!t~ \t)j"I\¡n¡);!':';~l"'$¡,~iftl~¡I~~';\Jk;f:."'.",mJi~ìiì1ìZì TumB;:y'renOth(1\) .~ '225". '100 ",.",.', """"'."""700'" . .",."~.=..,,.,.~.,. '" ,. . .. ~ê!y;¡¡~~}i:,¡g~I1¡.':í~.':æ.2;~f:;;~~~irc;¡~$+RÎ~Æfu*;;¡;::U!i:!'\1:t.B1~~¡~'UJJÂ;~~-;1!1;ti 95th Bay BlOCk Time % 21% 13% iJ11te.9l [g~\Y!Q)~!",J,~:f¿~~~~.~iËfr~~~~~~;~~ltjSjt;$;¡; ([I ~ m ZI!Y ~~u:.~~'I&"~m'III>'t¡)~~'!WI~~~ji',1~:¡¡~~ ~ ..q¡¡1!i.~¡9]!!!1J5!@!\íJ}~.z~ ~ê).\§¡!!;ïî5..i!.!~tj!!!tll'tgþstr~ @'j£1î ¡gl'í !l1¡~;'l_'!%ti;:~((tmll~_~~íJ¡ Mc.'Cmem~1í>.Jf~m15!;'Z,t:!:!~~!ò~¡¡i:~!yY1:I~iVV¡;KmJ'I'IB¡¡¡¡;::(Nt:lI\l;;>NBR~1f;::!BU!ffi;,:5t1 11'I>'¥,;:5~ M:\O2\O2282\Comp Plan ammendmantlSyT1chro\2020 with Weyer Ext..s~ 2/16/04 Page 7 L8~e Co~figur8tions;;;; ,;ttt,~,'I'I tit ".' ,.'1" of ~fr. ffië1Tf~ Q¡5 lip 1J~"\."*,,'I~ØOI:j~-gw"(!:¡frgdò';"11 ì 6ömøoo~!!'OO ,"': ~1~OO;t';nï~'W::I h ,..-."h\""."¡",,,_l;~..~,ð!~i"....,J.t~.....h.'H ,....,;...""b..., .,' ,...",~;':'i"i"""',~~},ig.":"It';\\'..." Grade (~~) 1% 0% 2% 2% ¡:3!Ï!1:rC!'\~5»)"".¡:, ~',.:.,,:;!;'c~.O ::7"'-S~75:0J,;<!:::5:0i;t1\~~;~~~f" '~j!.&:,~~5.ðZ~5;g¡¡:~.~\~,g Ls"s Vi:!. Factor 0,91 1.00 :>,97 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.78 ~r-..:¡...p'éd~!J<:~1 ;:<;;::::,;:;¡" :~.,~i!I!;;F~().93:"3:1 :ð-g4\i'J)oq..Z\;~¡¡¡"~~~i:¿~."r]~:"'~t!";;"j(:~,'f1O'(,~,~1,,¡:¡g FIPb. pedlblkes 1.00 1,0:> 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ ;::"'~ ,'r";.,.., ,,';, :.;fr:~~O1Ji'~JO1J'¡~!\I'I~~¡}i¡1':,~;¡;;J::-:F"~~;¡~1:00i.~1.00aU;~ FI(¡:'~otectad . , -"".,- ',.C:>"""1,OOC,95' 'ÜO"""" h'" q"-"~O,95 0.98" Üxi sa~:!~n~~ :;::' ¡r:::: ~~;..~~ ',1 ~J~i>..;~,14~7:9.~~E'f5~J~¡1':;~'li:~fF;~1!;~(c':;!:2;i,:"'t{i:'f{;Jik~e:e:r#"'~!!~:3 F'!?e!T"'.ined 1.C:> 1,C:> 095 1.00 0.950,981.00 5ë'm~)., n..' :":¡",~50~1"."~.4t1':'~~~'7mM;~"g;ffi!t*,,,,\i>¡~.b..,,:;~Ç,i,'1?p~~~ Vo!u~e (vph) 0 1.85 852 274 1392 0 0 0 0 520 20 827 ~!1=1: OU(;I~ 0 ":: !,;,!:¡~J'-~; OO.7TI : oo,7!:iW J:t~ ,'))9 ~~'j ; CJOŸJ;;1TIJO:;~ìr:'O~':¡(JQI;1O!i..Jò~¡;r),og 1'4 Flow (vph) 0 1485 852 274 1392 0 0 0 0 520 20 821 L-n:~e .G(OP~~~I,;"",.....u"¡;::J~ti~~52, ~.. 7.L~,~~t1;m.2i1t_U1\~;¡~Ufr"ii.i~1\\\Ol,,!t'ìJ:;¿;O,ffi.~.z!j;S:~,"(¡~1.9";7!. Corfl. Peds, (1It11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 f'IeW1V ~%~"'"~ ~""""~~~r&'iíTh 1 ~ ~~;t 'Æ"..,~ ~%Ø2:.tb~~,,~ 'llii'¡t"~ ¡um Typs Perm Pro! Split custom F:',f.Ç; ~ ~f.m!,~~"R{i~t'-~_'\'f{¡&\;í~1î1 !j~~\~?$'¡--.;¡¿¡-f¡tJThd.~~..6~q Pe-mli!ed Pheses 2 ¡"'C II; 2.' ~ ~J!~..Il\gm)~~, !j~Æò~lJIj~~, 3; 0 Ä~~e 9;~ ,\í'K~i_~~i{;;jiJ;, ~':V;;:;;¡'¡>lfif;¡.~~,~ ~ C5Â'iì(2,Z;!j~!~~q El'.ec!lve Green. 0 (s) 88.4 88.4 13.0 89.4 21.8 21.8 38.8 ~ 1\ ! é ,i!~~ ~}f,g~'ŒøWI.'aS1iB;&ÇI~H'~11~:tí'O16,(}.~íØ!i'C~N;i1Æít:~'fI."'" O;;,mRiJj ..P.~11.~ CI~sra~ce TIme (s) 5.0 5.0 5,0 5,0 <4.0 4.0 V i!n Tel 0 . EJ<t I!n 510,I'fQ SJ_liIJMi2\ O:~2(tJ ,¡y¿~!!2¡O~~~¡w:t~¡¡],~~32. U;~, u~~~ Lsne GrpCap (vph) 2888 829 389 3073 310 312 1128 v:!:.!~ a :: 9 JRIi' ~h'&;!,\J.J¡¡¡"¡!(\\%\ cu,9,13'..tJ)z:rÆi~~.)'j;ì\~~¡~4'!'¡Fq~ßl;). b t1. ~.á.t;\J !li'~ o.)¿s. vis Railo Perm cO.59 ~ ~ U .. 0 ~ I?& ;R. \ ~ ,;t. \l; ! t P A 7. gr 4N. 0 Î!'. ~ ~ , lj 601ft ~ ¡¡!'jl:J ~?$'S'!ì Jj 1. , ,,¡;< J ¡~,\~.%~ it ~ pi!! ~ .my; 5 .\1 iIf j¡, ~ ~ Uniform Dslay, d1 15.1 2~.8 ~9,8 12,8 ~5.8 ~8.0 33.0 !~(C)Q::!!9 ..5.~S!_~muJ..4.9a1.l\llj!¡;.Q¡~:~,5P'(eu j$!i:.~~,g:\':*~l1ï,~~'1;tJi"i!A1:~.,1,). 9'JStjpq Incremental Deley, d2 0.4 32.1 4.2 O,~ 18.3 2~.2 0.3 ¡p P..!!Yt, le)_~..tI_.~~¡¡q¡!'~~WìBg¡1J.!Il*~I,\W'i1i%1.~~~~~ Level of Service A FDA E r '! ",; " '0 .,' ""'iiJ~"fS2<""" '" ';;'~\10'O?;¡¡C"'~~" " ~~(.J"~'C~~~"'~"""""'h. 'B"i!d'!i!i~~"':Þí(",~.,."".'h", M" '"..,'s. [0.1 ~ \I.CI!QPi ~ m a¡y;t~~II.I4Mii1f¡¡lllkA'\ftiì\.\!~WJ Wt~¡;,!M:,¡¡~JI.lI.t¡¿{¡j~IIIIi!~l)J6M.iJM Ilwih'";ìi ~~ HCM Average Control Delay' 31.1 HCM Level of Service C ' - I1GliWßU~"lotC'apSCImrauo~.url1t!iKiW~_~~_' "'. "',. ¥ . .~".. . ~"",..",-""..~.,..,~~, ~"".," ,.."""",~...¡;,"",",,'. ' ==~~~~~~~.',"""'I__....J. c Critical Lane Group ,.,., 1 I I , ' , or --- '~ ~ ,211 ðfO.4 Page 8 ~m C»( m:t ~~ ~ t'! '~,: .... ~ THETRALVL:!-FF51 M:\O2\02282IComp Plan ammsndmsntlSyT1chro\2020 with Weyer Ext..s~ THETRALVL:!-FF51 ., ~ (I ~, G' . .., ~, " " ~, '" fI r, " (I " ,. (II 'j fJ fi q¡ ~ rø ra ~ ,. . ~ ~ ~ t a - a ,. .. .. .. ...,... 221: S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB RamI'. 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way Extension Weyert1aeuser Way Ex1anslon Study 221: S 320 St & 320 -.5 NB Ram!, 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way ExteMlon Weyert1eeuser Way Ex1enslon Study - t - "'\ t ..J ~' t ('" - 4... "'\ t ,... '. + .,¡ ¡1 rre;U!1:)Uptò\;,-.I:I:!,'! 4~~~YVH,I.~N H1.:ffti'N 1:1 J,K"\"uI«ii:\~1f~j.'!it¡~1\'~~)!,;¡¡;~~:¡,'itt11t.J;!I...!;!!!JI~¡~1 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1160 845 1217 518 454 IJI e U ,!l!!ð n 0 !!t=i¡ 1\ }~9ß"~1!';'¡i%1f, ~B:4O"e~~ Fr'n;',;,¡¡;:>,~ ~1á!: !:j1':::~._fI1'~;~;M O'ùeûeCëñgií1êštìi(íi) 138"""'2"5' ~â5 476' 407" """"., "...H"'".. ,..., ~Z2;11'~~t~~ì7'~-g~ii;:*,1312 ?:;¡!(:{' ::';':,:JE f~\~~T~"Ri-: ;¡W¡'Ri.'W1~Ž.~~ ~~1~Olt~LW:i!i~~1;)1j~ÑX¡¡t~~~.¡;¿:!~I~"52;;':~:"::~}>BJt:;¡:~;:;~_\11Ýit@'ti!~~'fi;,; Tum Bay Length (ft) 250 200 ~rrtB ~B '~IW~~_r,~P1'!~ ~6 %"J"è'Z e ~:"'f";Z,""!7:j1':tm!!i"!'!iIlW:~r",~~.~~. ~.W ¡¡štÎl~éilïy'¡;ÎôèkTlme% " , ,~"""¡:;'j"~6N'1;'¡_~ô,t":30"l,..,,,.,.<.,{.,;;;.!;.,,..r:."",*þ i!). ""'" ",.,i:1W'", H!!! 1I1 II g~þ'e n),;,~i\t~~%7(?!ãì¡Y'ií:9â';t~§f1~Mi:%1g¡;&1~1':r.:.ì%~t~';-f£'iU',;!i;\'~~~ ~'~"'l'I'Ien~~~J:!Cm~jt::l:Ig~,t;.I:II:t:!>:~VVBU'A!,';YI:IJf~~,WJ:3~ rlBlJ,-J:it'NJ:3 1,~HNI:iHt:'.m::;B ~..1t::;~ l¡fíl,":;H8 : ~~~ Configurations, .,.;,'ttt> .' ,i r "ft""'!, , 4+ . ~;;:.r~(~!iÞIW;';¡\~'k~.~~i!~~9tX1EWgOö"T";'190()?fWf~~'" "19007,'1 gOO~J9Oô~~\~~ :-.~~~(%) 1% -1% 2% 3% -~T~' ~,',6'š,.C1!ñìð', i. " e, JS).¡¡ji"",'),'=, ", ";a, "~:5;O~,;P",':5,:tJ¿1int¡t-,,, :, ))¡:<i5, ~,,'..t~!S:O'T!... 5.0' "J;';'è.::Y<'::')'~~~'i~m~ ~~-~ 'utlì: têé:íôr ~-=... . . o.åâ "d:8e " ..' 0.91"" '. 0,95 0.95 . . w.- ,. "= "!-. ~1J5 !).&8.:,'Wm~1!. 09 J;~';:~O~;'%~;U\i¿;iO:'9'Q'î~j~~t!;r;O1»<i ",(>:91":~;'<p;'" ~;:p;:~~:, '~~Xif~ -~~.pedlblkas 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 "'~-~~~¡¡:~.9;~.t1.P,B,~~,1iO:9:If¡~"~:"'&¡¡;&}:1.1;O:Oìr:; O:S 8.<:~<: , 'T'¡~.,~tt;,1¡',¡9+'¡,i:; ;if¡<~~ ~~:-'otected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 !"! ~'~:.tl~,'(pt!?!)Jú1{~~i£l~l~'9;;.~~;;C5.50'f3:'i~1ffSTF',1, 500' : :;.:, ""::'7;~'r;;;;:,~;~~ -, ""ffi'Iltled 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 ~~~r"'.~p~rîn)!¥a"I1~~~7i13£1'33'~~"i',;':;601:r,';"'i?~:"';?rr6'8l', 1500' "-:1~~";;,;;r,ç':'?':if."""~"'fl.¡¡;¿¡ ,,-,,'.,e(vph) 0 1104 901 0 1058 159 608 0 36<4 0 0 0 ,.. z;. ~ :[ð]l:.t~.~!2 t_!2ilâ1H!Q.1'¡[q!1fu'Aog~1 ~~'I~{i1~ OO;~t:Oö~J90J!1~o,{~~..l.';~ ~~:."!ow(vph) 0 1104 901 0 1058 159 808 0 364 0 0 0 :- ~ ~ ~ .~,t~PÞ.æ!.~( yp',1J )~~.iL~'" ~;mt2~~\i.O)¡¡¡¡t 5,1,/!¥,':;W;i4'5 :.ti~~~~ q-~~ì (J ,~~ O:~1ì. g :~r'. Peds. (#h1r) 10 10 10 10 10 10 . 10 10 ~:." ~ "YiY.ð nl CI e s:;\ 'oJ ~<:~¡¡~~;¿~¡b¡;jf.1fØ ,%_~t$1'!h'ifi¡ 1 ,%~~t!'i''~~% ;;,~'il~t.,~ . ".., Type Free Split '; ~~!4.i11M~:Z~i\r.&i.~.o.;.~.¡z.'i\ì!4!~!@~¡¡ -~~~~~~ "~-Itled Phases Free R:,. .~.~.@~...!:lH(!¡~~.~~~i.~~~; ~~:v'~!í~~Z~,':f<æ:l.\j,w.,g~~ :::"~::lveGreen.g(s) . 69.8 116.0 69.8 36.2 36,2 ~: ~;: ;!J~.!!.ì. 'æ]¡ð,!,Þ~~~Q?~,;¡,J¡jlmfi\i'~i ~gj,~U~? 1-~~ '~'~%¡¡~;&.~"'K~ :'.~.&nce Time (s) 5.0 5,0 4.0 4.0 . ,/;¡ro~ 181 t::X! ð n! J 0 nR ! ¡~~}Ø2 ¡ 0 iR'\."I2!I"~~!<;¡¡¡¡[~2',o ¡j~~"ki¡)'3¿'~ (~Ä~(;;(,O¡¡.$t~~~~1Ä ~~~ .P~~ Grp Cap (veh) 2856 1355 3016 525 468 ~ .' ¡: ~~~¡¡~~!:i~I\'M!¡¡. O:2,1~.f&i~cg ;~ ~'"P730¥:7}tIi.~~~~'ß1lfH~( ;;'. :>9t10 Perm cO.82 " '::~i;! ~~.~Y~1,1¡g u.¡ail.~~~lii..OI4,();¡~;;r¡;v:¡;~ o,!1ØJ~O:"97; 4:~~1ID~~~:x\~ ....n,form Delay, d1 12,2 0.0 12.2 39.7 39.4 f'd:'C1\ !.tta.¥!§fil!¡tc!'~4p~,q9 ~~,!,"~j:pf2m¡f¡fi:~tì~ to:Qr¡l'TJj.o})if,14~Ji~Çz:f;¡"""iò'~ Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 1,8 0.4 35.4 33,7 ¡:t~L~.K! )&~~~~.lLB'IØ~4j,~¡'ki:¡"'¡¡:f3; 8"J!1;¡~1r.r'¡¡I~.1~~73;!f!?~fiff ~'w¡2f.~~~ Level of Servtca A A A E E . e,ep.m~ C!I.l 03!!~(! 2m:~¡~J.~_3.i!!~Ø!,\t)lr,mt:íft;:~lì'iR$i;7",4{1 ;;¡,ì;7:¡;~~;;.~~ 9, 0 .M.~ Approach LOS A A E A l r:\I ~~ ~~~~'i!ID!~JWc~~~~~~JJ ~m ø>< m:i: ~~ 0 -n~ ÞI~ "r," HCM Average Control Delay 20.1 HCM Level of ServIce C I;I~C~!Jm!:¡\(.J.I.i.l!P .!1'!~tI) ~-~q1~~~.~¡œJ!'Ij1;.~:r~~Ì\""'" Actu8tedCyc!eLength(s) 116.0 Sumoflosttlma(s) 5.0 In!.i!.~~ .DJ.\'¡~ pifltY.i.\1JJm%~ t~<J.1.t'\%b ~JLI~U'¡Ct eyeli6tì S.êrY. [~~~~". c Crltlcal Lana Group M:\O2\O2282\Comp Plan emmendmentlSyT1chrol2020 with Weyer Ex\..s~ 2/16104 Page 9 M:\O2\O2282\Comp Plan emmendmant\SyT1chroI2020 with Weyer Ex1..s~ THETRAL VL3-FF51 P !-.) ~ .... THETRALVL3-FF51 . .,.. - -- ,- -- -- -- ,., .- -- .- - .., .. .." ~ .." .." ... '. ,., ~ . r. '. 'II '. ,. '8 ,. ,. .. ~ . . . ,. 'it a - e,. . 222: $320 $t&3~ ..f 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyerneeu!er Wey Exten!lon Study - (" - ~ t \. ¡ 222: S 320 St & 32 Av...§. J 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyerhaeu!er Way Exten!lon Study ~ ~ (" - " ~ t ~ \. r ii, ¡:z¡ ~ "............--I:!:IU.'\WI t:BJA'I¡,¡V:;~",WI:IJim31:1B~I:I,' ,,~Mj I:Ium::; I:I,I,iI~m~II~rn1.\W¡\.'mì\~~~~~ Lane Group Flow ('<)h) 240 1228 16 955 170 170 20 107 QOeIJ, , e'¡¡,'en~~1'O~ré'~,', s:ðT,:"!tID,'" ",,', ~,. " ", ,.",,7.,,"", "f2, ,9"","~,1,,",10~,>, tf,~,',~?','4, ,'5, ~', ,,\',/'~, "','til1"",,r,", :f:,,'i~~'f;J,Jm,'!I'7r ÕüeuetëñO1h 95ït¡¡;¡.:¡;;"'isò"""'160 '~31 """~âf ~i23 "'#205 >/ 38 ,F 10Ó,"',.;1'L. ,,' ,~ ",., <" rmemaNilmK ¡¡¡¡i!)m~'"""'1'!lt~'O'~~""æ""TI'<':~, ::""1',w¡'1'\i"""'7":,...~.,.,....ttr!;J"""~""'rn;¡;~l'¡,¡"~,,,1'" ~ ' " " ","A""""""",""""'J~"."""";;¡,.."".,y,.,c"",,,<"";:¡"'"w,,, ,r<t;¡!: ,".,,",' SõihÛpIOOkme(%) , "'0"'," """ ,~""""". .' ~B'!~jL'[&J(~ã1\í~~%:*;:¡~¡;:!tY~ÞE"~~' '%~ii1;r;"'i:;y'.:~:;;¡~~~!\i,:t;Ü~;i¡1::.1i'~! Tum Bey Leng1h (1'1) ,100 200 150 50 WIlT> IS !YlI:lI ~"'33 % ~¡~~¡¡t:J;i@~'~"'R'Jp¡r'¡'~$'~~\\.Ii"1'Y~~~~'!,¡~~'--" 95ti;èãy êíôdc TIme %' 29,%d 23if""- '28'Á "':iá% "22i'Á"""""'" '4~';.¡" ,.;:tl!!iWJ8"", ...W,¥, , ,,', ,0" Q.l1!CJ.mg:.t;,e.!L~~~.Æ,;I1.1.i~~š/~;:v;¡2-..j~'~!Jü&~~~'ir.t¡;.~--~¡¡¡~~~.!Œ [1)1 ~ mlll¥ - _oS~;,"~&'>I¡~P;;'&=1t¡¡Q¡U9II"!I1_~~IMt~~t:¡:x ;!~¡¡'1fk,'W¡¡r.-ìØi!\~I!i!_,!~m..m.- ~,~ !t!î.¡;~~U! elYÞJ.Q.1)l!iIe2'Cð ð,'dš ¡ þå psg tÿ:;q~J¡j ~!m. s y beSt 6.ffØ e~;;¡¡}~;7¡~¡~;L\Ij::¡j;j'}l~~ Queue !hown Is maximum after two cycle!, , !ID&'( oJS!~~ ~~tJ):~JEð. llYI ~éD'e"1S}.¡ijtJ!rÆaJ)fYT\TIf! lfâ ãffi 1$ íg r\ â 1~~~*;'t.Jì'jta¡\þ;;¡¡W".~t.iill />'ioy!! m t!!\ 1!1!1!J¡~~~mtt; I:II.ml: I:I,Wi'}:!: I:! 11~~W I3l"}~;VV!:J !13!',jVVI:I f:\'~ N S¡¡1;iP iN 1:1, r!:J11\N I:IH¡'1~::;1:j I1U!~:~ 131 i.;1,I~ I:II1 =~~=!~,~",J~t~"".~."J~ tt1- "...","",-....J1",4-"'9"" ""'900't",-~-....- 1,"e.~"'!"!~'(~P"'P'ln"'Y'H',,I~~::iJ,~I'l\¡!.'~\N,i',.J~w ,1900 '¡¡I,:1W>'i.,lttVV' ~00'.1 w:",ll, ,'i,',I~W.";"],ttVV Ln~e~v.C::h 12 11 12 ~2 ,~ '2 12 ,~ '2 12 11 12 G'9~èl'!!.~~~~~~'~":""~"--~ ,. C%' ','" ':7'" ':3... t;iJ;~;'O'~J:mm ~c:al Lo~1 :¡."e (!) 5.0 5.0 50 5:J 5.0 50 5,0 5.0 !Jf.ê~:~; ~ëë!ò~:~'::'!~"~,CO.;¡,o.9f::;-::-;""';"":: tea . O,9~':"~ ;".:~. C,95 095 1 "C!O~Ti!1:~:;,;',,:<;~: ~~b,pedlb:~e! 1.00 1.00 ~.O:) '.CO '.ce :,,') ~.Oo 1,00 "!55FPèCli::'1<e!"'.,~.;,~,.':,:,1.0:)l.~..1,OQ.,:-':.,:'~,O:)'" ~,~O:.'7""~'!:OO. -'.CO' ,"" '"f~:OO'~" Fn 1,00 0,99 ',~o ~.:J:J 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ó.!Ì2 .. ' F':!.~.[C~ec~C"..;:;~';,:-:..,'!:~t:._O.9.5:!;'~;1:~~':O:r;5:'-1.CO ~~::~O,95' 0.99' "~:-:"":-O.~5}~¡¡¡J,t1o.\.!f.z.~ SOld, Flow (pl'On ~770 '825 ~7;C "82 'S93 ~S:o 1;55 1852 F",CF!l..Ii"'~h,,::;:.'~.C~5~t>'J",,:.::'~"-o:~5"'; ~.o:r'7""';:7';~.95- :)g~ 0,. '::::C:95~~Ciu;;;\'j,...41 S.!d, Flow (ce"':1) 1770 4825 ~770 '892 ~e93 'eoo ~755 1652 ' '-:òll1~e:<VPhh"}:."':'¡¡iJl)':.~24~EJ'.1J32ll::'.'fgß,'.:';~ 15 " 935,..1";'2°":";',223: , 57,. : eo ';",:20;~¡;,~8J;~¡~~ "eo~'~Ollrr"CIOr, PHF ~.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.CO .00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 ;Qff.I=.JOw.{V;j~.: ~..'rl~¡.:t,i 24.:)~J.32JWr:~;:.,;.,~ e7:9~ 57~o ;",,22:J?-:--:: ~ '~C"":'I".,~u~~~~'I\1.fÆ~ L8~eG"OuDFIOW(vph) 240 1229 0 19 955 0 170 170 0 20 107 0 ~w.¡'1!~'!;r¡~~irB~II""'¡~1.1J ~~,¡J~~~"':~ :~'1 O,::-,:r:;1 o:'-~.':'1:~ -:.'~ c !':~~ O~:rOB.:!~,¡œ Bus B'oo~ftge! (lI~r) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 ;:u~J!ype~'}.1'~m¡(.¡:::o,i;!i!"..er.o.;*'!~l¡;;:ß:"..r.:~<~; '¡f'~ot;"'.:.!:;,h~-'1-::;-¡c,;:SO'I:. -':" ';':.,.<' ;;,.SoIlJ~.{~ "-oleo:ed Pho!c! 7 4 3 S 5 5 6 e P-ef":TII::ed,p:'8seS\1!"'~;':¡)'i~'5œ~!1¡;;;'~r.~'.;;~:;; ",':F. "':~~:O:::;:,~;!i".:::::~-.r:.';:.:: .-;-T';'::::::¡~~~ ÃciúêiedGreê!Î,Gi!) 22,2 69~0'-'" "Ú'5Ö.'j" "'1Ù "4.6-"'" "8.9 8.9' =::.e~~V~)3r!!J!!\,¡¡¡(~T~~2,2;~S;;{o8!!:.'!4;;;'¡'j;;'\,.f.'< 3:~~E 5O~':{¡!;.~,~;;J~.~.':~' ':fA:5., ::::,~~;:-:';f.!f;iI~!I'!'!ß~ Ao:ue:edC/CRalio 0.190,59 0,03 G.43 0.130.13 0.080.08 cr~r.n~ðë J!~,c.( s )';':'¡;~'~:P;'~'.\J~¡,>:,: '~~";:' S:O~,~.:':5:cr7i.-::' ;::: .¡;¡.;\;, 5:0-;'" ~5: cr~¿-;.'t'J:~.,\1..~~;!'~- V"~'de Exten!õon (!) 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 L~~e:'Grp;ç:ap..<\¡phn~-:ltw.33~_Cit:28Z0.R';~'~':'PJ~:~53 ':;2~ 17:,~'t':",::.'.","1)~2.13'.::~20~ "'.:- .,.,..,'¡~13~_1;2~ v..Ra:io~rot cO,1,( 0.25 0.01 cO,20 0,10 cC.~1 0.01 cO.08 v!!)3.~~o.t'a~ ;" ;",:,:". (;t:f,;",",1.:~;J;I~1',",;J>: '¿¡,!, :,;'" ~:: ...~:.~: '; ,.::;::;::~,.,~,:~:":j ':,::::-'::":~~~;;¡_~A¡!'W~\'!Q:'ãI v'c Ra:io 0.71 0,43 0.3:) :J.45 o.eo 085 0.15 0.84 U"~,~rm.u. e' a y"a.1":,;;~:f;:c.,(:J, \I.;;::;.1.~ "t!"" :<1.<.):':., ~;, 55';".'323':':;7.'~." :;;: ..( q",:!~' 9: e?~'::::;;50 ,~B.5;¡,~~;¡ "roqre!!;on Factor 0.88 0.65 , ,02 U 3 1.00 ~ .0:) 1.00 1,00 ~~e~IAI,LJ,eIDy,;a2::';,':!i.5,U.;:",¡i¡q\~,,~j¡¡':l;.~~, ,:f:";C.'!,~,¡,:,,,':':;¡;:17.;:a;;':~5:C~'rl":'":?~C.i~:I).I!'¥i.f~ De'oy(!) ,(2.6 8.7 57.5 26.8 e9.7 75.2 50.2 88,7 ~e,~!',l~e;~;¡,~,,: ",¡,".""~'¡'::~:.ð.i:i1-~,=,: ,.:.;,;:!::7-:":'C.::~;",";".::';;:¡'",=:~¡-:;:,,:='~ ':',', ,..~~-~;uJW.!m!'~ AoproaohDe!fty(!) 14,2 27.3 70.9~ í'l:'~'mlë..rt:O::;'.,,~,,~,.,...,io:ùir!, «\6jCß.'J,' ",', """""',,-,,, ,',',' , ~,~,'"'",C~," '","" ",-'--, ')"-,"""-,"'S, '".', E, ','-'~" ~ " ~..n.., '" ',.' , ' .-".. , "'-,""'" . ,-,,'...~.-,. '" "~'K""':M."'(...""",="...."",ü"" ".",,_.....¿... ~, - !:jgo~là.g§..-ø.~g~1~'-~12"'lic; Mj.l[ê !~It<!ff$~~~~~ HCM Volume 10 Capacity ",tlo 0.61 ~i!!&.g ¡çYd.§!L1g.!!JI(~ )~U 6.æm¡¡!§. ú ?i!(ót¡1 p.~!ll!rnel\.~)~'%fl:¡¡¡1i"iæ1i2 [J ;q.l1 Intel'lledlon Capacity Utilization 60,7% ICU Level or ServIce B é~q(!tl~ II ItfJ'!!.~~rQ\l P~~"{!'f'!r'f~~~~~~.;~!~.iQx..~~.' M:\O2\O2282\Comp Plan ammendmantISyT1chro\2020 with Weyer Ext..!yß 2/16/04 Page 11 M:I02\O22821Comp Plan ammendman!\SyT1ohro\2020 with Weyer Ext..!yß THETRALVl.~FF51 THETRAL Vl.~FF51 '~~~QQQ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~a~~~~~aa.a~...~~ 223: S 320 SI & 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way Extension Weyemoeueer Wey Ex1enelon Study 223: S 320 SI & 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemoeueer Woy ExtensIon Study ..f - (" - ~ t ,?" ~ ;;¡ +-" , ~ t ".. ~ ¡, ~:, ..n. ~ "".?.~f'<"~,"!¡¡~-I:~¡w.V!;tlJ~"'tll¡,~WJ:.Jb"i'I'Ntll.JmiI~~t\t"'.N~~::¡tllIID!t:;I:!,!m~t:!~iiJl&-qIl\fW'¡¡1 ~e-eG"':)'~=F~;v-..h) 17 1195 259 790 107 114 253 175 115 88 ~ ~ =." ~~. ~: ~~~: ~'IDì'&:;ti.8~2i!'2;rii"§26.?$:Z3:~""};~,; ~ea 2l.~~@.2~I~A~t;.o..~~1TI:i?;; ~"eue L~;"'I9~'~ :'t) m10 337 0 92 140 147 96 200 137 45 ~~,~ ~:Z-fi:~~:74~ ,~, ~50~~:~f. ;77.[2 a O{::'~jf:~~.,25 ~~~~M~fì§;ì: ~!~C:!:~~~.w: ¡ô":~)j;r!'k¡;~';S:." ~~~;.:::" . ~,r:,; .: r"':""':Y'71:¡FJ'::<;'~."~:¿;~$¥i¡;j¡;:4'i!f!~?1'1W.t';!':: ~u.., !!.~ Leo-;" ,-, 200 400 300 ~::~~':~&~:?!'!;::t'1:v:~r~~:7.:" ';;',:-":':;"':-~.:)~'F"!:~~;, Ç;¡E .~.=: :;'~!i 'LI7- ~~.:f~4 ~'V.:~ !'::\~}; "¡¡.t;,!j;~3 ,'-' ~::7Y't'fJ:,"î :I¡i:B'.;m:::;;-:::::-.?;~~rt!J£f¡t.~?~!?-"f: ~ 1I\'!W\WI;m.""fflWI:~¡¡¡J\t\11:J:.ltlW:~~U'i!I,VV1:I,r¡;!i!\W:1:{ m:! NI:¡¡."t.~N: !~¡NBK'*H::¡J:L¡m~::¡t:! !Æ:I'.:!l>tJR LereCo~figuretions,.".:~ :tt'tö :",::- ",...'.~H'tö "..,~ ,,4' "" l' "."~ t..l !mD'.~9it~pry.l~r9~~~m.t50:Vi~j9'bõ~19,öoj?Jf9"OðiSfJwo' .1!rÖOTIT~19ÖÖr~~~t'<.J,¡¥-¡:j.@ L.~eV'lidth 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 ;ë:ä rt'õ:!~,~ [I\.e.l(!)*~~~p:qI~¡O_ð{; :Jj.f5~!?:\~5:0~,~5: 0: . ";5: 1) ;~¿;:;5:'0'~¡.'~ 5:ðÍ~\{5. t);.~q La,. U':'. Fector 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F~5:':,ëdJb¥s!~¿.~~~JrO.1{~O\¡}g~~¡Ji'K:?:'1':OO?¡;fì;Ob'5::~"~1:;bO:'" "f:ÖO':~Cf.99\1f1;ÖO:~om~k!;.og FI=~. De~Ib'kee 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f;rt ~i'";' ~ '~~1'.ì:,-;~;çg,:r!b,/¡¡ B,tW;t:e,:g1:'m;OO i? C¡9'ge'E$:;::;:&{500 . . 1':00' ;;: ,0:8 5~()'O;~f:O'OJ§":'~ F:t P'='~cted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 !W.:f:}"r~fJi'O!),~~t:171Þ.~~fiJ~4¿;¡!¡,7!:f,1.~69" ?4S1..r:z.;Zÿ:DlbfMS' '115 5.?':1'5~:-J7,ì.oma63b\~ PI Pe...,¡tled 0.28 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Sãr.~:-F1õWweñ'iì~'C;~1~g7!g\1'1~j"1IT3'ö4 '0' .'4á1~7:,,?'iif;j1'!~ìee:8" "115s"'155:3'>711'10'\~(1 8~"..m-~ Va'"."e (vph) 17 1057 138 259 759 31 126 95 253 175 115 88 P.. ~ Í! ~: ~'5 u(i!,8~"61'~.~ t;t!'Át(!ß'J!?~i~)O9_% OU;:~1~O!'mmJ~f. OO'!' .:';'1ì'00 ¥~1TOO~'f Qo.\\'!I)-J, ~ Ad:. Flow (vph) 17 1057 138 259 759 31 126 95 253 175 115 ee 1:!fr'ë;G~tI1E1°~(! Y!' ry) ¡¡¡ra1iZ.4P$1tla ~Æ.\ ¡:¡:tTh;q.2'?9~!19"9¡~'T~~Ot1l~10,7\ ~ ;}';'I'! :(~5 3 %- ~jT °.!:i':~:r;'. o?:\~ Co,-.~. Peds. (#lhr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 ffiji1!"5'ë~*lT)r~ry¡Y§OWXt!V¿!~,,;0~~~~.0_~2t.. <;1'::0,,~)1'2'¡¡¡;:~,~:;'Q1¡1!;'.1i«O ~urn 7ype pm+pt pm+pt Split pm+ov Split . Perm "'ÌÕ~ ëët ~!~! ~~~~:¡~¡_~J&';91~:,Œ'~~~'_,,~[!f[; '4~;tj :,,::g:;Kl'~~~" Per"'¡~ed Phases 2 6 8.- ~ õTé d . ~~~J)C3l\!) _~21_.~g~îi:!,.'~g:J:*,i.iJiM;tj)~ 1!'5;J\~~~\~! :\:11; 1'J<4; 5-¡;r,38i~ t... 'BØ1~..1[ ~ E~ec::ve Green, g (s) '-2.2 42.2 65.8 65.6 12.4 12.4 39.0 14.8 1<4.8 1'-.8 ~ ï:~1t~_~.~ft&.;'Í ö:f5~0'.~1?J';l~~;.~ii. 0;If<1î,\:C¡;~1;¿!'T. O'.~J;tU'd 3~ Þ!l~~9. il~ C'eere,ce Time (e) e.o 5.0 5.0 5.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 mra~ðn'U'i !_2. t1 &!.m2¡ 0 ~¡~,&"'k:'~!\i; :í¡OXf(€.;~2¡O{ < :'~; O'.t+~ 2':0 :s~ lJ. 2; O~J.t?Z;~ Lo~ø Grn Cap (vph) 210 1743 508 2758 178 188 522 228 238 202 IiTfmi!' 8"e~J .Jhf'h'ti~\q:g;,O ;[)9.f.~j2 ~~~m2~T 0i'fS !f;,%~~;OO .. '" CO'. 0 61';!'0J1"1';¡rßOI~01~ vie Rn:!o Perm 0.03 0.17 0.05 0.05 v r~ e ~( :I ~~:œ~¡¡'B~O]_¡~,9B~:x9 :5,1::::, 0 :29 :~,!!þ';'ím\ 0' i 6 Oi"~O; 8 J I;¡';;'O;4'8 ~ q .ll ~ 0 :4, ¡~O.$. U~I!:I~Delay,d1 24.1 31.3 25.0 13.1 49.4 49.5 30.5 49.0 47.0 48.7 ~ ~ð ~ e rð~.\g.~vl~qi~;!!~),,~~o;~;117} 0; (5 :a]'tm{i\:~'ID'; O!';::ÞROO ');':1;1 c¡cq~,!. \)Q ...W¡1 ,I ~JK\l:pg Increments! Deloy, d2 0.1 2.1 0.3 0.2 3.9 3.8 _~~O.ð 0.5 E!~f>~ ~']~.¡~tajî_1JJ~}1\¡I~~g~;;: ~;~ _Zi~31g:1 : '53:~;;!?;JÖ;:ø ð +t:. -:f ~1i. 4.~~ ~p lP.~ffiU:~j!l}!Y.¿(~¡~~¡¡L~ì.Q\'~Ji;,@i'~'I:f;j~g;~*;Ì{¡¡¡¡;¡;,~\t~?!1j3~~~-? Approech LOS BAD 1m ð(IðCOO I){;:¡an¡ IT! acy I!!m1AAJt:1.Mm"m..\\~~~j!~~~~ ~~<I!_?i!I~'!1~w.¥In~XìI!~ ~â'!.v..'WJlïJ',8I{ö.ti:~§m¡¡5tJt;êftþ tll.et,q lieU!!: I !(11ietet(&¡j:.by,u p str!!etTI.s Ignel;' . .t")þ~ti "¿::{it!4g!;:;':-;'1;'Rj~~~î';',Z:i: ""fiI" - HCM Averege Control Deley 23.7 HCM Level of Service !Jß>~J!J!!)þ~t!>.lç,~~.I!.~t9IrI!.!I~ql6lì!~"'!J~t't¡;\~~W~ _'_0" -.. Actueted Cycle Length (s) 118.0 Sum ofloettlme (s) 15.0- !.Ò!.~í!,~SU901\i~ 1'!!I<1! mUlJl.n; eJI.!>.o,m.ìii~&.~{!J)3,~t~*ii'! ç ~.I I!lJ\I..eli~f J.S!,~ Œl (:ð~~¡jI~l!,)¡::~lìi":~~ c Critlce! Lene Group ~.I,. v,. , ...... ';'. , "" 0 !_l Mr\O2\O22S2\Comp PI en emmendmantlSynChrn12020 with Weyer Ext..ey6 2/18/04 Pegs 13 M:IO2\02282IComp Pion ommendmentlSynChro12020 with Weyer Ext..ey6 THETRALVL3-FF51 2/1 eIO4 Pege14 THETRAL VL~FF51 \ 0 ',' ~. -- - ,- ,- - '- '- ,- .. ,., .... '*'" '. '. ~ ... \Ø !.. '. f. (ø ;,. 'ø 'ø '. r. (j '. '¿ r. '. r. 'iÞa ~ '4) ~ -a a .. . t 224: 5 320 5t & Mllita!:L Rd S ./ 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeu,er Way Exten,lon Study -"') ~-'\ t ~ ',. + l;II:¡e.l.ir;)L:i1._~¡¡¡,t;t:c~" ,';;I:~~"""Y~~,\'YJ:t¡~I:'I~I:'It;I,mr:œI:(_:;;~~,U~K¡,!tl~¡iJ(\q Lane G~ Flew (vP~) 1C3 ~ :57 215 236 1079 127 123 77 202 260 150 RU~~.~t,~en..1l:~~,1; (::'Ô'.~f..5C.~;~; ~':: ':; .~'2,.:f:-;t~;(:?èi¡,,"kE:~:J11!3}!&';;'~{P~J.1~A1_8.~~2,~~ Queue Leno~~ 95:~ (~) ,-,13(; .~S A 253 250 78 1A9 « 209 267 73 !~:~. ~E3i.L¡!S.Œ) :&~~;¡..: ')::-"'.1 'Z5'J~' : :,;-,~,<,ì.(~t;;'~;;~j:'~~~{':'2?,0;3~~.Ií&1iBêr/ 50.." u, el~ TI:T\e(....) ~C~ BIOC:I(STlme'(,~) ~"""!,'.~~,:~;~'):;~,tc;!~\'fc~;;::::"~if~*~~~'f4P*,_~'K 7"ü:=;,'ee'yï:ëiîg:i1(f'.¡","""-266"" """"2ÓO" "~",,.~, """'175""""" 100 ' ~~IB8'f..e,~ e.:,~t' :>;:, f!~' :'?-'.:' """""!!"'.;';;?1.fi!~è";'ê-;{fl¡~f.r{!i!¡b"!t~.~.r:i%1il~¡::¡t 91Seèye!õëit7T..;;,'¡"'- '..' 3.'~ """""21%"'*11%"-'d'W""4"', 12% 22% '. ~r gxe.~~l,{ ~ J..., ~t :: '. 'i. ~~. :: ~7f':';:-:¡;I1B;);¡i1p!~l::~~:hZ%,¡f--i~~1:Æ\i\'i~~~~ 1m ~,~ m 1I(y'~f6f_>t_~~~~1'ro;"'~~Io,~~,#,i.v,m¡:~\\'iÞ¡¡ '\'j',w;~I!!>itIl!iI~í11 my õfUtfl61tõ119_5 J!ì1Þð. ~tI I e:¡c¡O ede:! !fm ~ !e~~ jbYlÞ p . ,I ~e¡' n'(ÍI, I 9 n e 11ft :fí:li?i;?-¡<;j¡q.~{j~:tì¡:¡,j!iZi"gÇ¡¥~~,,:£ ~ 224: S 320 St & Military Rd S 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeu,er Way Ex1enslon S!u(y M:\O2\O2262\Comp Plan emmendm8ntlSynchrO12020 with Weyer Ext..!yß -"') ~--\....., t I' Il,cve ~ 00 t~~~l:l:Il."Im!¡; t:!,f~',¡ 1:1:1 R#~W!:l¡:¡J'ì<.iVVI:I"I,\'1AWB Ki!l!;ìN B []i(~fN B,J,J\~N !:I!-!fflÄ~:;!: 1.111#:> t ¡:mr.t; ~ Le"eCcnfiguretion"!!..tttt ""~ ttt+ ", ,~~t "f '" ,~,t, r~¡¡rl'!'~~~þl~J1~1!!!ð.W'!:<1)Jm~~j':1'g{jbJ'S{} ~OO~:ø:ÖÖ~JOOð: 19Q(j;';;:19061\';i1~f,~'~~'!~ Le~e~""d!h 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 -;-öf5~'tö~~M!i¡J!)_~þ.;"'~;~,tÑi;j;¡,()1~T;;ÍFi5:t1;'¿5:(y;,;!t9f'."B¡;if,j5:0:, '5,0 "';S~,.5:0;m.:: 5;q:Ìf,!5:c17j~;5;'o. LeMU:".Fector 1.000.911.001.000,91 0.971.001.001.001.00 1.00 r:. r;;5iP~1!5J~!!. s.~~!~,1¡!~tWR9J.1¡.O~]f.f'i1 ; 00 itPrtr(9!J)?:~IOO' ::1; 0 0 j~:f.OO ~ J;öOl~J; ötf~:: °t ~ I'Jpb, pedlblke, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 r r.'4: ~ ,1"~~1}gp~.~q:~~:;;;r'1T0-q::W'~ 019 ~ ;r1!~tq¡-1;Oö : f. 0071';:0: s 5~ 1 ~"J: %'1,,;1 ¡ Q,~ Fa P'c~ected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 0.95 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Së!3W ~!ê!¡~I~~.t~m5~lilZ'f;o)¡¡;~es~~~~~~ ' ,'1 M31f:\'~ 5 ~~111..O:1~,S e,~l1ffi! Fit Per:"':ited 0.95 1.00 1.00 0,95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 S"aT:f'.FrO~{pelTT)11!'1¡)m¡¡;;'7.:>ðj¡f$49"~\15!!~'J1";1'f'f0':1"';ofee5?f:~'iI\!~3':! '1 ee3:%'15~770;;'~!~ VOlume (vph) 103 1167 215 236 772 307 127 123 77 202 260 150 ~ if R (. ~ ro-~~ blltJ¡¡'!t.9Y~~~11.;oq; f:;'t':O-O::';:~iOO~ 1';'00 ~1;:'lX) >~ 1} 00 W'f;1~Oa.~:roo~, ; ~,~I\J¡' ~ A~j. F'ew(vph) 103 1167 215 236 772 307 127 123 77 202 260 150 r:! ~ €. G'fõB,~Þüì-*};1,Þ~_21 :5)~2pa j¡~%t 0]'.9 ;;¡r;.,O':B:127¿j: ;it;: 12 3~'f.å;7J.'i!;'20 ~e~ 1,~ Con~. Peds. (1I1hr) A 10 10 3 3 3 13!ii'B~~/l1]1 r¡%¡¡¡¡~;¿~U~ù;~'S:1~2if.~'O;;:;~0 ;~m§¡¡~O~, u,:;~~ 7u", ir-e Pro! Perm Prot Prot Perm Pro! ' Penn ~tð~i!ëte<!!!'.[~~.m~I1¡\liEÎÎ;*iJt~~_E~;B!;~e"¡~¡¥W5'J'.\\'~!)E3'{;;':fcfe~'iW:.zf~'~7!~~so:M>r'!lJ Permi~~e~ Pha,e, , 2 8 ~ A'E!iJ¡¡reC!:~~gi'\S:>¡($i.10).!5m:¡.~¡:z,!.~;o.e:27~$~19:e,,:5,e¡2';:'J'}[\:!¡1',i~,e:O '11:7:"\1 p;,}De:5~'~{~ E~ec~:ve Green. g (,) 10.6 A6.2 A6,2 20,6 56,2 9,0 12,7 12.7 16.5 20.2 20.2 """""""'/""""'I~"""~O-"^"O"""0:'1'8\"'O')4"""'~;¡",t"f^'O8"--0"11 "0" '"f'.O"~ff'f'I'O' ~~~ "".~R.e__II{'~!;',!.!"'$"""'W\'!i.~I~~.MIô\.~i,ë..!lii,\,V.~ """,t.", ,s;." ,," p,r,'~,';;I'¡:g",>,,"'" ,,' ,', ',', ,.. i;A., ",';1;1!!'.., !!.".¡Z!A;two(~ô¿ , CIAo'ence Time (,) 5.0 5.0 5.C 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 S. ~lë'" 0 EXle "910",( $}]~;¿¡O'tt\f¡f¡2¡P"'ií< ,. ~,jEJ~2:0Æi~It.:riÌi\'!ìi~,2;OlJ;,;(r2rO'm:~12:0)~7O'~~ Le~e G? Cap (vph) 160 1958 630 31A 2260 266 204 173 252 324 268 ~ZDf§l,ó ,P.tO..\~1_~q.9"'¡;';£i'i1t. :,.: ;:k~~";:f~~~,-¡~J;œ~j't';:'O:O:7~1&;¡>t;;::cb(f;.~¡,'J~~ Vi, Re:ioDerm O,1A 0,05 0.10 ¡¡rèfiR.ã\rò1'.~jJ'!'.;r~:";;;;rO!e¡¡'~~:::3~:':~TO;75, ' 'O:4e",:'?'-.::;~C!.4'8:, ,0.60,:-: O;AS("::,():80~O;8O§~~:sa Uniform Deley, d1 50.9 27.5 2A,3 45,3 20,1 51.2 49.2 48.4 A6.2 ~6,0 43.6 e~ï;è!'jlõ(Ì!F.ãctõ~:~;~,q:~'P8P;~0:07¡:!t:\f:00 1,OO,':',:':;:!{:~ÿ¡I'00: ,1,00 Cff1:0i) ;!j[o:eí)¿~;~~~5 Incremental Deley. d2 5.2 1.1 :,2 8,7 0.7 0,5 3,4 0,7 13.7 11,0 1.2 ~lâYJ$YŒ§¡¡,~S;~t2.§¡:2:9:f&¡;;:0:: 20::e1¿ii~:4"'C~,:5'E7;' '52:7;;,:C49:0"Q;sa::~52~~~;Q Levelo/Servlce D e A D C D D D ED' C ~~tge.! SY:;~)~lWÅ\~1!&~m'7' 2 a ;7~.,Bi.;;"'; 5}~ 4:¡;¡~.!Tf7-; :t¡¡J\R~ 9 ,~~ Approech LOS BCD D I (\1 81:$8 CUO¡¡¡¡ò:\UfI1 m W}'JM!.l\iilÌlw¡m¡ U!!tmJtMf/ID..~~j¡tféi~~~'Ñ¡¡1iI;IM;mii'-- R~"IÞh"'¡!¡¡¡'" ~~\V.~ HCM Average Control Delay 27.5 HCM Level 0/ Service C ~ 1'I~'Uk sa liOa "", re8""1~\iR,~,' "",' "'õn';::-::K;;""::"'~"!r:¡¡;;g¡ AcÎu':t;d-cyc'íë~e'n~ìh'~~~","', "~,1, to,"~",'..,',"'"", ',',',,-,', S~,,'~,'.~, I,~,t, !I~~,.(') ",.','" "',",,',,',,,"', "',"\$""".,1,:5:8,""X-~--,"',.,.."': '~,,'. '"~,,, m, '",'" !mp..tSð..qll!'l1Ål>.ep'BÇl%J!1..tJ!1Z:ãt~Q.!'1i9~ìKOr;ø:t;_;;{JC~'VèTE§~~ ' ";""{~~~T:;C}~ c Crftlcal Lene Group m - ~ - - ~ ,J ~ + ,/,' :gm ø)( m:X: þ~ 0 THETRALVl3-F'F51 2/16104 Page 15 M:I021022821Comp Plan ammendme"tlSynchrcl2020 with Weyer Ext..,yß iHEiRALVl3-FF51 ",'þ 2/1 ðIOA , Peoe 1ð ',r,' ...... & r ,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~.~ 234: 5 312 5t 2. 32 Av S 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way ExtensIon WeyemaeuserWay Extension Study ..... ., :(: - "'\ ¡" '"'\ t + Lane eonnguratlonst't+ ,'I' tt'l r ;Sf 0 ~c ~ ;~i!~ ~~a~~t ~èT,~'~IT'J:1¡.1~~E;t g~7; ,S~ ,;:rnZ:')~ß"i;;:;:,,:.,g;z'%,r'%%;:¡¡£7i,&'¡f!¡¡;;{;;;;;¡¡¡;:¡~¡~kilii\:; Grade 0% 2% 0% VMt,~, ,,,"'."',,'.N"'..,',)278,'~,~,.21,a, i:",12,11""!,!""",J¡,,,,'2,',~,:::],"~,'"",.Z2, ~";<;"",.,~,,.,Ç.,¡!]!;~,""','~~f.&,,(\;,~, "#¡,Ii*A¡;¡,,;,\",'~, ""'~",¡' --,.= ->, ,,~.."'.....~,.. ,'".>, ,"'.""U""'" "" ,." 'M>, ,.,"""'" ">,"',,",L,,.""."" ",-""..>.....",," .W~, Peak Hour actor 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 rn;ni1lmf(1fl r ale"{Ye!'iI!1);f. "~t~"'1"""""""""'-"1-""'1""'~'~2"'~""'-" ~ 1.,:;;W' .';;¡ I" 'v"§}lWf \ "-g¡ ~~~f~¡¡n;--.""." :'"L 1~?N".~. ""'<",:t\'~};:?~~i""1b./I"" 'foN"~ i"?Œ1})¡;¡;t:":)ii~'¡¡¡i\::'K1\~"ð¡!ð~,,$:;';¡¡,,11 '"..";!f£1mi,,'í ~: I~ ';;'; \~~~~i,\td{ g~E~~:m~~it~~~,~;:;tT1¡:~ :t,¡[4'¡f'¡¡"%;~¡~~~Þ1~~~'¡~¡f:i*~~~;~;J~~'~Þ~1¥ ~ ~- ~ P£1!! 0 !Wt'ìkP~r£'f;.~::?!~/~1;k!«¡\k~t~;:'~:TTY.11'bi:~~F't!~,tY;?ß.(ift¡?:-kiaTh~fitt iS~;t~t_.;\;ij Righi tum nara (veh) , ~~~~@",-, iE[:è1'(Yi~'~~T\.Yt:! ~9~';ð7\7~'~ytk{lr&'¿11~j¡¿j'~~ MedIan .!ontOe veh) 1 ¡¡¡~~~M'.J1~I!¡1.\&.~~:S;~J;Z~;¡;;~.(l~í~i~._~~~ pX. platoon unblocked ~' ",. ,~m"~..iì:r:~:~"",;¡;r-S54)¡¡"t!~67("'%~'1;W'."èMW_~]I1j'q~-~1m ,.. ,.' ,..""""""".,~"...",.,¡"~..,..,.~;,.,.."."...,w.,..."",~_..,,""""~.,.",, ,', 1, Slag& 1 coni vol 396, £QK1i.!.!! O~~œ.v;.O¡j¡;¡~~j¡,';i\~~1~fz,~: f'j~p..ì,~,~~,!i'i~:'2;;;~è~Är"iHi¡,i~!&'14:;:;¡jf2*!\!i) I'!_\~!~'It.¡¡;¡~~#t~;;¡)!¡¡\&iÌ!l1R'1j!¡¡i vCu. unblocked vol 504 854 267 ""'""""', f¡m~, :m'm¡,.,~~~'~~~.,;:r,(¡',^,;',~411l'1,',!,'1'J;!i\o,\1,;, ',.'j, ,6, .8:,'~!':6:9,::,':,"""""¡""""',";,;it,i.,','i7i;¡'¡",',.t,1,!:(,?!:,!""",'í4,':~~,:,il!W.-,',""",.,'~",,:,,:f",'ä,t:': ~6~i~¡¡;óè(.) , .. ","..<,,'" ..~<"""J;1",..~., 5,8' ,_. , ,.. """"'" ~-"'U ..,q'..W'.1š'l>\'~~ih.. , Œß'ìJ~m~~t,~'l4~{:~¡2~i~!:;¿¡:j,ßá;1$;f~i~;,~:;,)t.%~~j~"%¥;í!tJ:{¿'~~ií1jEfj~Jþ;~ pO queue tree % ' 68 49 69 ~Æ.êà~JtasitiùieJW)~~~]'iiF~1~Iœil~~'1¡~J~7;I~~i-.'1t--~1ìr~~- ¡'¡~~¡Jlii!!mH!I:t<1::.H~1m-~):B,'~1\(cX\'B"M'lYBi2BìV:V.t~¡3~J:! -~_.. ~.."'--,---....- . .. ~~tro~9.5_; Vofum&Lell 0 0 121 "ö 0194 KO{U m 6~ g n ~~~al.tt1l:'Zf~~!.1J ~~~,OP'~¿¡9 ,I!¡ 'ß\'£ti~¡g::z~~,t£!Æ$:'I!jli'J:!i{.¡wWJ!¡iM8~~~¡J9!J(:T cSH- ., .. 1700 1ioo'104â 1700 ~1760-"'5à," 7f1r' ," ,"- ',', """. y~ ~~ ~¡LSS!!'ii!'.~~ \Ji11.61.Ø~gm¡¡K~.'~,O ~, '2)f;;; °i~!~:5J~~~i~;\ Queue Length (II) 0 0 10 0 0 69 33 C, .0000u:c¡.¡¡¡e¡:""7*~, 1,""\'OO.\tJ, o,.o,~tr."i,O, ,0, Wi, &i.ai9:~, "ð,~",'O, i,O, 'J?""""',,,.,;:,:0;,O,;l!!!,2,~, 1,',8&>:...,"1",,'2, ¡Z{t~, -+.;I1'ìiI!, ' " ."",'~¡.",",~"I"',', '",~,', ,',' ~,~!.1!,rfi;¡fu,',-"j!, Lane LÕr1>l', ..""" -".~""..".,.,", -A' '.....<" ..û..oc"" 'ë-"'ã"'~. .,<.. , ,~- ~".. '_L ~.J ~ ~ ($ ) l{ift!~~o, O~~r~\\rt;&:4;TI~ì 2JO:!'i:\1íi.¡'~~~:¡;ri (I ¡K,~17TS ~~t;tr"m:~%~]I!w.~FŒ:¡'1i¡'~~¥i\ 5 Àpproecl1 LOS' ' ..,..-. '" ,'" ..' ".. w' ""C"" ,e., ""'" /"", ~'. . ~ .", rn.\ ~ m IIIY~. ~'%,~f!¡;ll'1!mRl".¡:¡m:l;!l.1'im~1>W£,,~¡¡M.I't¡;¡¡!!~~¡:.ru:m¡~w.J\1:¡~["'W$~'iIilmf',iiW,,¡r¡j Average Delay 5,8 Lal!'.t'- e.s!Qm. c¡;~ P~!Y h uJJ!I~! iO1)1î~';yI5¡B.~,~)WL~:IJCU~r:evð[Bf 'S-¡íi'\i I ~2ñi1;J¡,{ITJt~?;;¡¡¡í!..6X;jiD11ßa'W~~~~': ~J!.O .jrouPM!l\)¡\I\;_WI:!:I~I:t!I:{~,\!!N!:IIZJ*~f' !:I,¡¡¡JW¡~!:I:I'iiI'.~tt~-:;'~"':~¡~" :~<¡:<'1:';¡'j{~}~~3!<1~~~ ;,ft". ;3roup Flow (\'Ph) 300 201 292 353 732 ' C:~.:~'t:i!rlCt!iL.~~Zl6j1ì~I&¡p~]!fc7c.~S3?1' 224iWI>1I.,,<i:..mr"~'" . ,,'~"'i ~'t:4~~ .:~(;:¡"".:t~~$ c".",'Lë'ngìíî95t'h(iì) #3êö 63 #2Ùj' 1'3 322"" .,.'",.> ,,- '~'o:':-i]¡-g~~¡¡)¿t'~!}!_1i~~~!!:r:.21ö:! '-. .911\ ':5:,j~j.;~'" ~:.~ Jp Block Time (%) ~r;.~<'Jp~gr~là"Qiíl~:\»~~¿&:r~::"~',:;'~~:":~~"1m;~::": '.. "'., , ~'è~\'i¡,~~;\¡.;~ '".. :lay Length (II) "'~"" ::~!i!m.e:t~~~~\~"Ì~1l,'7?i.~1~';"'.i:': "':~i:' "':')~f'1¡;%~":;tf."1~~~~~: ,,~... "ey Block Time % C::Ã;,'i'gl?~8l1Y}JY~.Q)~...~~~:::~~:~%:1~; ,i-¡':}';,"" ,>;i;:'\~;;'::;,:.tJ.""'\ftr~~ ~~ I:! J:~ to, ~ ~ vy¡! ~!:Ic.h-m1' N B L.~.I:\ ~1\~~*,W,~w.~\:.~'W. "':'!,l\,Y.u¡q:,~~,VIi\'i,~w~ I (I !~ecoo 1T;;:rum m DIY mí14~~R~_;:tø:¡¡:¡>IT,(~ftfRIIt¡¡,'#.-¡;:m;t~" ~¡¡z.-~!;~-';1iM dmãt!l!íSlI;Ê'!i.ij.!!!Þ1VÞ1QQlW,@':l/eëêëf.mÞ.!!§. ~9 t!~ O~!.m aYÞ~1 §~ gé.t _1\~ÞWI?"'trn'" ,;;W¡t "ìi\~~~ Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles, ~m 5>< m:i: - -em '»x G):J: m(jj ~~ ,.,.'....;.,; . __1- 2116/04 Page 17 M:I021022821Comp Plan ammendmantlSynchro12020 with Weyer Ext"syß THETRAL VL3-FF51 ." ... ,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.4~~~...~~a.~ 497: S 312 St &. Milita!l'...B£..§. .)- ~ 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuser Way Ex1enslon Study ~ t + ~ ~ \Ie ¡¡¡ er¡ 1 ~"-!ól.L~!;II'<~I,1W.lit!J ¡ti1';'::¡j:~TIœ..~t;fAr,re;.~¡mJrn?~I'£¡¡~m¡g~'IiW,¡¡ Lane Configurations, """'1 " rr ',"I ", t 1+ ~~'OO ~fI¡OO~ '900 ~ OO"ftf g 001Jj{."BI '00%-;,,' ,1,FN""'~<"""i1'¡¡¡~ ), , "",¡¡¡¡'¡.¡'¡~ål F"'~'F fJ~,~~~(~¡j(~,.~:ò!ØiM""'çómli.'!"5:(f""'"5:Ó"""'5:0"'¡¡'"""""A"";¡"""""~.~~,¡,\""I;1.;¡...,^¡,,,, { __"1M';'" F!!:,e..~~;¡ ~~c!"i.:i:':i~; ~ -::~~ ~'~:X~7:":o-~,~t'J -:-. '~:::50.;;¡f~;;¡3!,li!i.,¿1JÞ1,¡;r,,1~:;¡D.Þ.'i¡ifi'k1m:jJìi.¡¡:¡;~; Ff:)b, ped/b;~es . .00 :.92 ~ O~ ~ c: 0.99 ~::1ii~~1.!!.'~""';:\' ',;;;t1'i':":OO~':':':f:OO~f.C';). -:OO't';¡¡w§i~~~~;~!lM\l~.;;~t~iJ!iA'\)í.~1::tm~,~A~~R1,~~~;j FI'. 1.:-: :.85 ~ :: ~:: 0.96 ~~~) ~~r~fdí::i:;r; O;; ; :,,;~~¡;g::T~:);~ ~ .~~ ~~ .':.~ 1i~~~i!¡~;;(;~lR7;¡¿¡~lii*¡;j~i~~r~!im~¡i;~*,~iM~¡¡¡Wi¡.¡~¡f\ ~lfffo:~Hiê~'S:.N.~~ ;"'7~;~~~ ;;~~¿~~~ ~~~." . ';~:reI:rè#ii&'~:wZi>£¡t;¡¡'~lt~~y~(aí!~1Ih't~1~wÆC.¡ Y-Çl~.~~~Ci?l')~f;.),.,.",~X:ì..:;7; 2:) .1.:)~::2;;2,~~;:~53,., ~9jt1,\~t2~.1*~~J'jf1!~;~~_!W:lf~ Pea~.~our fllC~O~o P!-'.F 1.:0 1.C:) ~ ,DO 1.C: ~ .:ìO 1.00 ~ ;t.;.9:1.\~Di1ii".?i;-r.;;\d;? J.:C';~C 1. ,~:" 292 ,,;\t,JS?"'~ ~ ~9J~;2{1$'ii~~4rr:!Ì~.~¡¡¡"'j¡'¡1.¡\'!~:1i@ la~e G!'Oup Flow (v;~) 3<:0 20~ 292 ~53 732 0 ¡.;~~;~~~ì.c",j,~),i',~~;'¡;", ~\~:: O'm.:;;~ ~: -- '-:: 19'æ::;1();'¡H.,.¡:t>.iï#f;~tj%'ki'f;ft.1¡~>J¡Iif.~'!!¡i(,~~~¡I'~!\ eus e'0CJ(8"oes ('iN) 2 2 C 2 2 0 . j.!-mìT~:l~;:'~t~':t:!t':m,:'=e~ '~r:'.r:").:i~'r;:" 'j:'i~~$!,fi;~~;"~ì¥;}':iñ'it~:f~~j§~t?j¡i~'¡iW~~¡'#1í1'f:î'!.~.'!lJ...'~¥j'¡¡;Ii Pro!ec'.8".. Phases 4 :; 6 ~e:;:.:!:.~.~~;,~};¡-;:'¡',¡, ,~?,:,-:-:-~-~.~"2v.~.o.: - -':¥¡',?é3;;¡¡it\\':;~\i~'J:,~:t::ì:îW~\1i"'.q"R1îJ'\~.ì3~'im*!!j\j;ì~;&: AC".Jsted Gree~, G (s) 22.:1 22:1 84.:ì e... : :14.0 E'~~:'8enJ!.;'(s)~;ï'22:~";:mi:a.r.0!":94,O' . 8:'¡:0'í¡fV(';Ä';;¡;;"ii(i2~W¡~a1\¡~(¡ar~fitfilf ACtiia¡e~-;-têRa:,ò' "'C.19' 'C..'g' J.72 G72 c:i{"""- '~...d .".,'.""" . .' C'!'~ë~~o;(';~¡¡¡o,'.oj 5:0"':;:: 5:C' ,..;;.5:~}"= ~.O .' '5:0::1!_~(;~~~;~:iß'¡1$&~l;,;¡,«~¡W}V"'~{:iI¡¡ì{:f;! iïê~iêJeE;...êrÎ;;ê~(s) ""2::"2:) "go"2: . i.o"""'" ,~.. "". ifb.<-'" .,_.. ;~t~~~¡;'~~Ot~nv;.~lJ..\Ç¡!:'~~:"l' 275.-,,',417.:- 'i;~ . ;~tWt{\;t~';¡¡¡'rJ;~;\'1!!j*~¡í~t",¡¡@¡1!¡i,:g'1}'\¡~!'f.<\!k'\mj'ftÌ''\!i~{f:' ~(S}:,(8"-O.~~:¿:¡"¡;{;::¡~.~",.¡;:~,::-'~::.'¿';-~O:S~~~:"',- ' -. v'e Ra~lo ~.¡>:, :.73 C.7~ C.25 C ~.¡;.e!!lyrA1.:1:;~...li:A5:9~.:.u:2 "'r~g:C~5:5' . Proçressio~F8C'.or ~.:C ~.::J C.82 0.78 ~.~.e.;;;.a!.o~!:,~I:~;;;i!::;;:25:!r;:T.e::!"~!!:aJ:'):::5 - '. Delay (s) 7~ .5 52.5 16.2 4.7 ~e!~.o",\';¡"\¡¡¡'?iI ;t,~:"::¡¡r::';:~~~Bj;:;;!;::?A'." Approec.~ DeiII'( (s) 63.9 9 ~ ~~~.I!.c;!)~,,-u.:¡J'.z,~~\>.'(¡..,:,~ E~,:::-,!:~,,':¡¡'I ,':'.,," ""'Ií'i~~~,:;...B~~¡¡;¡I,~!2æ"4â;g¡~*,ÎI1ÆtBJ -om JQ~ mffi -~ "'I"" I ~: m t en t!ÇtIØ rT;.'b!III1 m 8IY mmt mw~I~I'M-!illl>t¡'It~'1j ~~ mIi!-m'l1Ii ¡",..¡1b!.~~~.ooInl\~~,1 !i~0" ~~!~~~2 i1!! ~1i, I:i C Mi.U\ yeJ;6!1$.tI(VI ~ií'S:ìê!.~;~c;~I~.- HCM Volume to Cepedty ratio 0.74 ~ a t6a ¡4~ 1.1:8/1~!!1K I ~,j¡J~'t¡it!ì~1"8! 91'¡t'Ì'~Sü1'i'i"$ féfõ!!'trrñ'èj(! ) _4iil~~;fOT!1 ~7i\iN.{;jt.i.\$,j¡¡1Øi:¡¡¡;¡ int«š. ~é8p8dty.UtJiizatlÖrì .0, 86'1'%" 'lciTL:é"Vë! òÏšëiVice ". "~"~D' ., ~. , 1a'Lq¡tJÇ!,lllfMl.~1!t"ï;;t!:,'1¡%J¡~~;.$!fm¡¡¿9'[!',.'ft:~,~~\!í~1:::!~:~~%;~¡;i¡\i,'i,{:i~!ii:¡"ji!!ì~~¡11i@)i;?J%!i$lN;¡:tt~f!J'¡.]ì¡).Jj;¡ ;g m' C»< m:C ~œ2282\COmp PI en emmendment\Sync~roI2020 wit~ Weyer ExI..syß I ~~l~~FF51 0 ~ 2/16/04 Pege 19 ...J ~ r , ~ vI r.¿ (I (/I (/I I,. t t/ rIJ (II ill r. f~ r. (¡J ~ r. '. '. r. r. r. ~.. ~ ra a a ~ 4J ~ a ~ ~'~' ~'a ~ a..... " 135:S312St&28AvS ..f 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study -.. f - ~ ~ t '.. + 135:S312St&28AvS ..f 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemeeuser Way Extension Study -.. " f - ~ ~ t r-- \. + .¡ (.'D!6ì.~ Pft!i~I:¡j qE B m.~t'vY8 ~1t>:VB n"a v:vBR11m fiB ~ fla}~SB -'¡$ t:(¡ÆJ!OO!¡!1.¡¡~~B.,!m¡ Lene Group Flow (vph) 292 446 104 449 43 53 128 23 529 P.Re_U,~¡;}\Q g ~~~1þO""11~;~2:1'3jm;rö4 '".,...' ",' o~t~' 14 ' IZ'<\jj,5; if1'~'i"!5!:::!~~'fj;' tT;T.;~;f~iJ¡;;:,f'.,'?JY:::~~ Queue Length 95th (1'\) 1/217 173 51 178 13 45 47 19 1/308 tQt!!!!La1;~!\Ì.Qr~~m":'ü, ,1'238 'm"Jj¡,it;¡1'S]?,," "i:~::""~' ",?,,;¡rw.f;"1'~1~a::!~;?;;ii.,'YÆ!~I?:" 50th Up Block Time (%) ~P;.B!~...lli!l~l(~lW§;;i:;t'~:~;;):r",~'::::.¡;:,,;:,~:~'":':' ,:::~:"~::!\'!;;';~;:';:~¡;¡'2.'ir~:)?:J;;:{fr.;¡¡¡iJ!ð~;;:" Tum Bey Length (1'\) ~..e!~mll1!!~~Jì4~¡~;:~;'~ ;;r;";!.fl~,;1:Jr::¡¡;'J~' ¡, ';~;CF;t " :';;:TI)~W:: "~¡~'~~\~~S":¿$¡,#iWi¡¡¡~';~:: 95th Bey Block Time % [g'~e D. 8J J)/¡l'(e.li ~~if.ttt f,¡ 1~aI¡:;; ~::-;.t:&l«;~m:":¡; ;:':r.~';~~ì"~ 11Jj,:::~~~lt¡¡¿; ;.!Ii\~';.:\:;4 '~'i;¡:N~'¡¡~~fi ~1 ß~N8:r,\1}1iNB Ri1'!iS B('~ ::H'll1ThJ§.B B T!mWBR¡¡¡~NB "~, ~ B~EBR'I¡'~WBL21;jtVýB .. " , t:ßL¡~1:: '" , f,\O~mØ!1!'~1~ÞTh Lane Configurations,~,:...¡, ,,', ' ,'~ ,t,{' "i". ¡. " " '\ ¡. ,,' " I'Bm'rIõ\Ÿ'fVìffiPJ):~t'&'~J~'!5({!:!:1i'!,!1tX):tEt~j,,%fJ0b"?'1 OOO](J:SOOY¡¿-f900' ',1900, "'1900",:':1 gOO~~ Lane w.~'h 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 G~("Z;J ~"" :;¥.J!í1YJr*¡J;\."J'\rp¡o;¡;tm1~'~~;~%'.i;;:¡,t~,,!<;r;";'c"Z~'~~';¡'" :"'1%';"':7":'T:,;r:"l:;:::"\1,.Æi\~¡<;¡':)1; TO!BILo.:t',..;~(;r'.""'5,Õ 5,0""'S,Ô'5,O""'S.Ò"'5,0 5,0' "'5£"'5.0' ", m ë:t: ~ '~; F 1Ië'.?: r¡'~ '!TI':a~~9q ~k~\~1¡t.&';tt:r::00 ;}\; 1;:oo;J;¡¡¡mOO'i!';f.O 0,:: 1,. 00 ,,37f':,)ìg.:dJ;o:a2ì'l'r~: 00 ~1t..1¡¡),ii ~....b, Ded'~'~es 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 0.98 1.00 0,99 1.00 0,98 ~ :-~" '!:itres ~:~4+f£'O'i~I!¡:fÆit1 P5(c\i\!iJt~1i.)¡:¡\NO:'99!!,~¡~;O~I.0':997:';1: OO,,%~~.;'M~~'7i 0 ,!JI1~~r..tXJ~1({!f~ ~r'. 1.00 0.98 1.00 1,00 0.85 1,00 0,93 1.00 0.92 F:: P~II!'"-I è~ t:i:1:w!""\~~Q:9 5A1;O~'t[951';1i\'FO'ð;~\I1'if'(r.9!;f:\...;I;OOhFi':; ::i¿C'. g~~1.00 ~""J¡¡~~ Se'!~, F'ow (P;;) , "..~ 1721' 1723 .. "1738""783 "1510" 1751'" 1841'" ,n 1746 '162,("" , "'!'~~I!'!>d7'!~"1\~~,O"','ììWA'\JOO:~l~~~~['O;42"7;f:O'Q~~r>l\OO1';¡;:'Q"Z:!' 'l;ðO"::,::,:;ry;;;O;ð7¡:;":r:~¡:,~ SSid,F:cw(pe"T;) ",' "7~ê 1723" """'759 1783 '1'510'" 429 1641' '1240'--;è24"""" Vo' u - e. (v;: ~),:t ;;¡,\,~t2!J.2.f¡~\1?}!'8:,5,7Æ~}m.o4::,r\~¥ 9::¡;~j;¡:43,:¡"';.1Qt5:3t)i',,' 65',,'(,-.:8 3,'I}1!:1',!23~2.80D2,8_,!: ='ea~.~ourle~!or. PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .: ~Y. ~:õwJ -,;:1'. ,~~Þ!~;:Z¡¡~î1<m:~~¡!£lÌ')~, ~!':10:4~~fffl9 j¡f~~œ531): '1( ~ 5~ ~i~; S':!:!j!fi¡ 2,31!ili:.! ð~ ~ftreGro\!oF'(.'W(vph) 292 448 0104449 43 53128 0 23529 0 Cõi' ~~ I'~ ~ §!:111 :~;""~\i QJC,ji>JIh lO,m~ '~l~l'O~'B1!410;%l%1 0 ~;¡fW: f O~1~1~ Tu~ 7v-.e Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm ~ ~~ : ~ ~ ~: :~JHR1!JA~~~lálir¿¡¡fu~Ji¡~:~HI~i:<rN;;~S+ì\~~>'J!ir$~';¡;:¡~ 2;:;l£ti;,¡t~:~~~'tt"!L 1:1~ .Ä~ ëfóCQ ~ e ð n1\9..Î!! )<1~¡¡i::Z:2i.5.~;~æ"'pg2 z:eÆ?22;~1¡1J!22fB.f.:.1¡¡:t:!J'9/)ii 1 S ;9':jl<!!:.;~~~1ei~M, I./..'i~~ ::'!e~~ive Gre~~, g (s) 23.8 23.8 23,8 23,6 23.6 17.9 17,9 17.9 . 17,9 Aë'.iJft r é i!: b~:R iít~Iiß_p:~< ~agE@ =~~0I4 S~§ 0;1~;~°'!4 ð~(':3~?f.: cr,'3 5'::'?i:r\~~13!:~, ~ ~ßI~~~ :::'ee'e~ce 7""e (s) 8,0 8,0 6.0 6.0 8.0 8,0 6.0 8.0 6.0 1; ~ 1!1: X'. ~ ~ 5 '0 "¡fa )¡¡¡;_i;;Z¡~~i!.2: oJli¡Þ1'k}1~;'MTZCO'~ Z:O;¡~'!i>2;O1!%W:2;'O?N'~<2': O:;;;iJ;;;:W'~ 2':O=~ Le~eGrp:::Bp(vph) 342 790 348 817 892 149 570 431 564 y, s: !'.'os ~O ?'fc'. J~'\_~~~l~~¡r.)%w.~~iq;2:~¡Ä8~".$:):;¡;;¡O:O e%1~~~1ë¡mrR~~,~~~ v's R~:¡o Perm cO.39 0.14 0.03 0.12 0,02 y L~ ~ arr..ì5.jt},¡_~-&~&9~~l qg5.!!Jm~~\5.t3'.9J~0':.5~ð~t .(JJþ.gOi3!!j;;O :22S;;:~m: 9::¡m q .~ Un;!0-mDelay,d1 12.410.2 8.810.1 7,812.511.9 11.218,3 ~!i. ~ m~~¥.~!9.9 jf{\1!Q9B~'i1Î\~1i1ifiOP:~'f',¡P:O ~~"~1ro.Ot\r:1 :,oqi~~O ~~ '~c'e..,ental Delay, d2 17.7 0.6 0,2 0.4 0,0 0.5 0,1 0,0 23,1 ~~~YJ!)l1j:.~~~![~OJ;1if'",¡!pJ7æ!;~!~;¡h8:9\~':"1 O:!S7;¡¡~~¡8~1J::O",' '12:07'Š';p:~,'J\l1;1;~g;'3~ ~eve! 01 Service C B A B A B B B D ~~!~~"¡¡f,~ ,.ms" ~::i"fI!~- ,,' """"~""""'10'O%-~""12"3"""""""""i1:~"-- ~;io~~~t'ð"Š"\~ &, '~',,"Æ¥ ro""'Ì3' \1;'" ,};,kÚ¡":~\;'""" "B"':"7r>#M:tM"4<:f?,-'" , 'B';~~"'J'ffl,L ,v'Ö~¥<I.~ 1111 ~ IT! a~~.1\' \'XI!\.W ,m,,';'ß mB!ii~~ '!Ii 'l%1¥Æi!'tl<'jo,YI'l.D]'ji'~,m>mJP;~Wí>.røll~mm>¡\ò;lÆ~ ~~j!~'~,*~~~~~C:~~i~~t¡I~~ y~ue.' m ay, b \,)0 Q ga r.'1'%;":iJ¡~;i,,;:x.j;{!i~\¡j_fE'~~'rr_§!,1~ ~ mm'ã\Y~J~~W~r';¡~ HCM Average Control Deley 20,7 HCM Level 01 Service ~"""""ê"" C i! ~ ð èl !11'!!1: IO~~" O;gSI~':bJ~""W;'1;:;<Ìii\;~~!J!:';!;¡1t,' ,';I;r:"";iC!~,~~ ;(~~~¡a~~t~'!te'ngti;(S)"" , ""'5r5""""~'S~;;;"~rìõ;~-ti",e(.)'"<"""""~~""'~"""'=""f"'~ ~'1!~ð~Tf;~~~r%Ì!u!mm;~¡k,;\~~k~~~mJiD Ct:rLëvê1"'l5I1Sèryré~' ", ' ,~'~ :m~~ !..~ ~~ M:\02\02282\Comp Plan ammendmantlSynchro12020 without Weyer Ext..sy6 " ¿ 2/1612004 "", Pege 2 THETRALVl3-FF51 "'\ :..... ,NI'.""'.Ii;ff,' r , ~ Q ~ {II (II (II tø f'" rø (IJ rlJ ~¡J rø r. r. 0 ~ ~ ~ IÃt ~.~.-¡ ~ 'J 41 ~ ra ~ 'J ~ ~ j J J J J ¡ 2:1 S." -+ ~ t ..~ + 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeuser Way ExtensIon Study 219: S 320 St & Gatewa ;,): 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study (" .- .- " ~ t ~ ~ + 41: I::! J}e~ "....... """" -~. cJ: .lmY¥J: ~~ J:J !1'~~~I:U¡¡;¡:G,:~\\~~;'¡æ~~1>1>,'¡¡ Lene Group Flow (vph) 94 1898 31 1973 49 73 400 107 ~97~f"\~~ ~2~5n~'r-:~'24~4'j' ',-1"t9"Y.-~~t ,Qt,-" "'1i~ï!f'....,r æ;~ñ'¡¡;-~~~'(;;f->i"7i"59"~""'5«"""';;;'~t::~37'¡(\"53"""35'~'i469"' "'¿o..;""""-&w~:"":"-"_. . ; ""'> ~h' """"'-"'.~"","~"'.':o':.,:.'~".'m<""M<~~""C*6'e\':'7.'~~;~~w.~' '" """ .~""",I;..",f!.~JO,.^,.:"....tA""""'" ....."...-""".....,.."",¡,¡ """",'""""","", "."..' -tiiÛPBiõd(Tlm'è(%) , ...... ,..,'S% '.. '," "",""". ..,. 9A.f!!1,~~ r~lro!..{~ ~.,r~i'!'t~%~~!~3,%~I', ~~.. .' "J~~}¡~Ÿ?~~f.Ø:'l?,¡'i~,,;':ft ffmmí'.!-t~;Úìi Tum Bay Length (1'1) 50 50 75 100 Wl!!i.B ~B~ et'!I..~~~4"g %'7,~',~ ')',%,,:' :~;:;7~r:E-\'~ "4!%?§ ',,~ ,~, <If ,,::i";:,1è: {J}~,1 \~""'4"' 95th êay êioèl\ Tlm6%"""OO'%--S2<,r '\2% 52¿,r' ". ," .~ '53%"" ." ,-,,"<' "..."" ""'" 9.!!!9jO.g~~1~}j¡'~,'(Z.a2 j~';~;'I.z:t;;'I~3~~}fT:: :;-' -;.,,-~J;;~%'$f.~~'R;;'¡¿,'iiÎ,;.;.,~¡~:#~?'i~¡¡;H!~ì:; MPvem&l1I~~~.ww'¡'1M,!!J:~u:mCJ:,I¡~t:l;lt¡>¡;,YI'I:n:"q¥Vl:! 1;¡¡~Y,YJ:!:{4í~J'~BU.;g, NBTJ%11i~I;U!Ht.::;~ 1~t;t!B LaM Configurations ...~tt~...,:.,' ,'\;tto ,"'1, "to '" ' 'I ' ¡.¡ ,"'; ¡¡~a!:t1~()'5~jI¡~!~1~ø:.~~1] OO':7;19OO:7õ.!.S:O-O3!15'f~ """ f9oo; ','J 900;; ;:1 ~~~ Lane WIdth 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 11 12 13 IUe :t~j;~~"~f" v~ì..~~^i~~;'JT.:?~ùt:,(ê ':1'\t".{~~t~'! '12'%':: ::;ê :,;;:~ ~~;&~!';¡.~;~ Total Lost lIme (sJ 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 ~aDð:;tJ.í1fJ!Eìiš1õX~~j)¡t; þg.:;.~!1~ l~rl;~~:çrl~O "(}'.;;S'; 0 ;9jTfj~i17~¡ëXj ; , ':I;t5(j';::¿;:~;:l¡f.f¡ ~~';rog ~ ¡;i;r~ ') Frpb, pedlblkas 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,97 1.00 0.91 S~p'Jã!5I1\.e S;~1À'IiI:~1'9 9_\~~¡¡¡;'$t~!@J¡çrO!1£71;°.o ,:¥.l',:#,!;;iÍi.."ß.:d !~ "9:¿(:}iO 0:;1. ,~;;:i(;'i!J 0 : 9.!I~'; OO}¡'~ Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.S7 1,00 0.85 ÐD*.Teët~d ,~:, . ,," .,' ,,' d';~,~}Jf<L~1:~'$\Hj,¥>:¡O:9'5SXOo~~1~:h~",M"""'1:00,'!b,,';',:,~~1 ,OO;>:;"';'[\~~ Se!d. Flew (p'o!) 1752 4909 1796 5077 1309 1181 161e 1541 FTf1'ë.rm1~~dJ:r;~:;-:"!;~. 0":!1§~1jtJ:a..,'\ii;i¡¡4ß;~,,:.;:;þ;95;<'f;O(t\:Ër~!5"~'1j:69: 1,:OO'.',:";';\:':.?",.o~7V:m;~ Ss~d. F:ow (o~r:"".) 1752 4909 1796 5077 948 1181 1207 1541 VOl úr:'!s' (V;¡~) ~~...,:.. ~"'-'$~~~'~.râl~_~z.~~l~ Jt~ï)18,2,1.~fi:i1I!;S2}~~~ 91:\i1iki: 8X¡WE 65.;¡';¡¡~.~()O,~ìið~'.<?j; Pe9~.~(Mf3c:or, PH" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 ,;d¡;: c.: CW ,(..... n Jl'!¡.'~ ':~::;¡ (,;) i.~~§!J~?3~¡.jv"'¿¡¡J~ra61=¡? Z?fl'~~~~~8j;¡O;J.ì,).6,5:M;.'1i,~S!~~o.~}.o~'t La~e Group Flow (""~) 94 1898 0 31 1973 0 49 73 0 0400 107 0 ç;Oi: ~ ~,I". ee ~'W.~ !:".", ,"'1..2BA1.o,iIIo1!!WJ,t1;(¡~,~¡lA;"O~.°<it.~Pì~~1\IP;:tf:U¡1 O¡'1!!'<&to~.,tq*, -~ HeawVe~lc:~s«"') 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 30% 30'A. 30% 0% 0% 0% 8E"É!~'J':\~ .;". ".j~rOIil!.' fJ;~;¡'1;;;.<I.\O"'¿\~f)'".O+'~..i*'!¡:).¡¡:O~1:\~~,O~~O7J~"f~' Oq.\'i<1<:Ui'~~ -;\Jm ;r,.ft Prot Prot Perm Perm ~~ëC~~ ases.' ".:,. I' "~~.~i¡¡¡~,<,~i'Jl,,~~e..4~~~1'~il"'+4 (~1¡r¡i~:1::iì¡¡:""'!h;i;~l~ ¡;êm;!~edï;~8s~S"""'-"" -""<"..",,.., "4"""""""'" '.. '-e' , , Atroete::.Gr&C';.G.(S¡'-.,., '2J.',!i.57,5n.{.;,',~,. :-"r:Çl9.,., ':~.'.i,:~';,:;4u.8$b~:4N..SM~;:¡~!~~O~W.fJ¡(~ Ë~ë::ve'Grëèi"ó (s) "-1'Ü-- 5-7:8"" . 3.'8 't9.7"" '39'.63'9'.6' 39.6 39~ð ' f~ç~(j.e. :1!.èI,:: IC. '38'.;0 ,j ;;¿i~,~ O! '.~;Jï,.q.~ .ò:: :",: ,;.." , ~~C,3~ O~43-:. .¥!-. :;! ~ a:..O. 3~,¡J,~,p&!~,{í~It~R.P~o.~:lift.P:'3~æ:m Clearance Time (s) 04.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 40 4.0 04.0 04.0 VéŒirEre!Tõrì(s) "'!ì.,¡"2,O;""{12.0;:-:O!:"'~T:'"2:'0"-"2.0' , :.,.' "c,'.' 2.07\'!!1m'2¡0¡:;);:;;'~~~~?2¡OI/!.~2.(¡~~!i!i1 LnneGroCnO(v;>h) 177 2446 5~ 2~75 324 0403 412 526 ~!s:Bõ'.ro,'l'.rò!~T:~;!"I..,:. U,üo~~CIJ.J9>'I,;,7;..,:'~~:O2':~cG'.3~ :,...,.:..,..\:,.'T:::¡,¡w;~;o:a6~'¡X>l~~~~,!J,~ vIS Ra"o Pe"" 0.C5 cO,33 ~~OJj,,;:r:,<.'~:':.:¡- ,,~..,¡,.O:53;,tO,!.6,:~,)'..:;,:.":""'.C:5'5-:: cr:9:'~; :::'~::"':-:!:0:15j~Tf:Ož1:~;:¡,m;t~;¡!¡¡,o.¡9J¡ti.1:¡P)2~g¡¡~ Uni:om1 De'ay, d1 49.5 23.8 554 31.0 28.5 28.8 31.6 27.0 i;';~~'.s:cn..tAç:.ar;:¡;;~'J:'\l;!J.O.:.iiJ;l,'C;'::,~¡,::;~,~",f:':.'4~~:;g" j.;)..~:::t~~"~()!Jl:f~'¿k:i';1b~JŒ¡1.¡P..O.~J~¡¡.:t\~ !~creme~~aID~lay,d2 1.5 2.5 e.o 8.4 0.1 0.1 38.04 0.1 oJ e,!IY,.\ S ) 'I':;;bf;~.'i¡)~>< ¡.;;,; ,.;, 0 J.&'ID:~l~A'ij¡fi'L ~~91.9ÂikI~~~~È1};'26!9',~ Level c'. Serv'ce D C E C C C ....t>-p !1',ß,c.'1 ;I~el Ð'f (S) ';i:;~~'; ~;út:>.ì:I!¡~'..II!'.fI.¡~í,3I1l!~,~Miit~~'tt"i'2~H!~~~~! Aopronch LOS C C C !1118{Sð,Ç1)O It.~ m m II fY-A-\j1~¡;¡¡"j\fj¡¡$',R~~IIJ!~m>l'ìi\Sy,1 ~~~,~ HCM Average Control Deley 33.2 HCM Level of Service C ~ JiW.¡\}.~li4lu.:e. ~,ç¡¡Y¡.I.I!!!Ç!.__.t~:..oA'tll~~~),,~~~~\i~~j'i~~'Jií.'$¡if~: Ac\uetedCyclaLength(s) 116,0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 !.a~~.e.ÇI~!Ç: e ~,~!YiJ.i!!fli!Ii !l.c5lk~~P~T,¡\;ø;i§!,1'CU;t:exë'1(õJ1s e w.~~F"('91:JfB~1 c Cntlca! Lane Group 1m ~;:¡¡J{IJ m ~"~~}!\1I!1!i\j¡¡om.!MûtI'-!/!'~1'. ttlJ!f~~ m~~IMm.1'¡t~-¡¡¡¡¡w,!,l'd.\)¡\'!U!II/tI.'l_)!I&¡ !'jfJ.~§'\!}!Þ ~~.!I'!!'i<lpÆm..!i ~ ~Cé. ed s 1 C8 P Ii ~Ý.r" q u 8.\J a, may b a) 0 D gar. . .;jf¡¡Q¡,,'{c ,;:; :nMfJ~~\;?4,;¡¡.#:;~~~: Queue shown Is maximum altar two cycles. ~~\ùm~~~ ~r~uré -:-c¡aêÙ e1š' 1tìSfè'iI!'a;bYU p 9 treNTeS I go à I~~;' w ':';-:~:"$éà::~;~,,,,:.'t~,i>w,l~f > ; ;gm G)X m:1.: ~!!,' 82\Comp Plan ammendmantlSynchro12020 without Weyer Ext..sy6 ~~VL~FF51 (:) ~ : 211.612004 Peoà'4 --- 2116/2004 Paga3 M:\02\O2282\Comp Plan ammendmantlSynchro\2020 without Weyer Ext..sy6 THETRALVL~FF51 , I' =~ ;1í i '-Dr r ,.. , ~ ~~~'.~\.'.'.'.~~ ., .., 'W \. '. .. .. '. I. ",. .. . .... . " .. . . . . .. .. ~ ~ .-. 220: S 320 SI &. 1.5 S8 . 320 Ramp 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuser Way Extension StUdy ..,.. ., (" +- '-. + .¡ 220: S 320 SI &. 1-5 S8 . 320 Ramp ,;f ...' ., 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuser Way Extension Study (" +- , ~ t ". '-. + ~ ~¡U¡:OUPIDM_t:~ !~.11if:BI{~\:Y1ò ¡:m,w ¡¡ ~1'<::;!j 1.~191I:> t5 ¡~::i 1:Iß~\__H""'R1¡¡;~mmm:~~\t~1 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1-493 838 27-4140.4 263 277 800 ~.!à~,-en.gmL~{!!18~ B ~~1:O~-;::~1r~~~ ;:~ZO,f~l'31!:.;.;I1~:£1,'i~~:¡ç~)~~\~"t;:;~:;\ Queue Length 95th (I'l) 9-4 m161 1-4-4 23-4 286 302 170 ~üþLí~~~~'Æ!~O 5;~~:;:?~{~, 922'; '. . ::t7'~~l7r'?!~;:«;~':'1:~~'T~~:t:;qL:rf(I:~ ~~~~~=~~:U',m~;~~l~ ~~~:~~~g~!1' /:::"" '7,:7¡r~;;::~~~~n'B;'.?:!:l~~;"1TI'~m#~~{t(J !Offi'!!~~"'~"':<:"""TM~'~':~'2'/õ" . ""',' "",,-v;"""~""""""""""'-"':":"';"":"':;""f¡¿;t"'¡,."',:-~ 95th Bey Blodt Time %. 18'10 27% ~.ft~~t9¡tý~.!1J~t~'ii.'1;::;r;.::{t~:r.5!}~:' 'S'- ;~.%': ;}~: i~:;'f:jPÍ¡~~w.;ì;:.:-iIT5¡--€Z4'rlIITi~~t'~jl'~: Move~ ~~lm,r~:A1¡..^Ji!!\\11¡~t5~~I:t5I,,~tl:.l;!;\'j\ij,VVBU\F'-,YV!J .",,1WB K:¡lJ,';rqB,"~,'J;NI:J I)",,) NBRire¡SI;~\J~:> I; 1"'~I::stnf Le~e Co~';guratlons ,...ttt, r' ' 'f'\ Ht , " '\4' r'rr r:f"èii' i'fêW{vpnJ5I)j¡:~~(íj,1~)J!J~~J)'ðö~öO,'.J19ôó~~¡¡"m9ðO'. '1900 "-'n)'(X)':;'1~fIlOdJtV~ Gl'!lde(~) 1% 0% 2% 2% 'o/.ril1.,m 11J1'~ì~§)!¡¡~X.4'~~~~~~,Oè~5.:0";;;T5,('~~;Yi:: . . ~';""";!\"~:~g5~~~6,.!! Lere um. Fector 0'.91 1.00 0,97 0.91 0'.95 0'.95 c.1e ASh 7¡j"'eë)~:"1~. ð ',#.t~,~¡t1P).~ 0 ;9~1'fö 'O':?¡r:o'O:"'~i.~~'1$!;t~'! "):r;"."\~;C:?:, f~~WO~I OO'mt',oq !OlD:!, pedt:)lkes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 r::'f""'.'~"'7.¿:ì¡';~~i,,}.t. :';¡,,!~1.~;g~;¡;r:OO""'J}0'~~7';("' ';:""""'}t"':s'm5o;,~,;O6,~þc¡;~ Fit Ø..,,'!!'Cted 1.CO 1.0'0 0,95 1,00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Se~cI,-:lcw (p(OQ~:Ñ~W"-,; .:'50,-17'. ~,;\,!!i:;~e7?{J5f3~::¡~î,!';'ß::~1?::':' ';:';':7\:;g¿f6~'87~~ !Ol! Pe-:~'ed :.O~ 1,00 0.95 1,00 0,95 0'.96 1.00 ~T:!:"FFß.Wem\)~*%'.~~ f":'1'.m:33Jfl5n:?51~f¡~;{;~f7" '~,". ,;"'jit%1.~.'(~}a~re~~ Vo'u.."e (vph) 0 1493 838 274 1404 0 0 0 0 520 20 60'0 ~ ~õl:" r I!.C1p r.\t'J;'! téì}!!;Ø :tX)';!-:¡;1:'OO::::1:C9$'tf[:O:o:~r;oo1Q p~OO¡;nmOO:!fI1;OO;~)~ O:U~J99 Mj. Flew (vph) 0 1493 838 274 1404 0 0 0 0 520' 20' 600 On(GrC:L'P1Iàqy.;i{yp'.r:11B". ¡¡,~:~ A~J:.::; ,~,3:sær2Z!lÄi'ff4(J.if,m~p~r~~O],!%:~0'1"5!;~1%1'2:e;¡~~M~~ CO".~. Pe~., (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 A~V ë ~~~~~1l%.';\':!7:"A'Yo&'It[t1,," ¡.'tis; 2 % ;:""~2 %~%':\T~~ Tu." or-e Perm Prot Split custom ~ç:, ~ ~ . ~!~S~'i---~'~~.;¡,~~~~'i~z~~Th~¡¡w¿:,\;¡ø;~1';ì~_~~~ -~~ Perm;~ed Phases 2 ~~u JI : ~A G !èên !'i!ilJ{!¡~~-~~D~;:¡Æ¡~þ"9J~¡:;'~!iæ¡~t¡fW:_~~~2J~ ~'~~M,C! E~ect:ve Green, g (s) 66.-4 8M 13.0 89.04 21.6 21.6 j6.8 ~ II. \ ~d. ~PjJL~ìJ:..g¡~_Ç¿~~:.rtRt'~1mgJ~Q¡¡f~~'í~i¡i(ií¡Wi§'g;,W~)\._~I~;iiO ìlmtoJJ.a'..ìt..... 0 l¡!.~ Cleerancft Time (s) 5.0 5,0 5.0 5,0 -4.0 -4.0 11è"!~.:x: II ß 91 on ,j ($ }~-!:t'¡¡¡2 ¡Pi$¡¡¡¡¡Z¡ o~.¡¡¡¡¡;z,o:,l~$;Z¡ 0 i£fu'i!(j\~fi<l.P&7'1c,'m':¡l1:í W;:l"\?!relí!\i;Z. u ~;¿. U,m(-II"Ji!I LeneGr;>Cep(vph) 2868 829 389 3073 310 312 1128 i¡('!:¡;Œ!J'òJ'. ~~,C!J;'O'.~0}2l"$¡¡11íí1f~\~}ti...~,,~~ ,',~ Ç9¡1~ ~1m vIs Rs"o Perm cO.58 '!! rll! SilO ~~~~6_I:L.OJZQ.;,1'I)'Qílþt~m~;#U¡:~Ê;\W'¥¡m"~Ä'tO1e;:¡A!J, e8. 0 J~~ U~!ro~ Deley, d1 15.1 24.6 49.6 12.9 -45.6 -48.0' 32.7 P. ~ [j! s s 15n¡¡¡;~.~tl1!'i!fi.~~~_!¡Jl#i'~QI8mo:8:~;~~~!f!~.!f$~:,:;,~W;'J~ m-,l\ ug~'~ I~crementel Deley, cl2 0'.-4 27.-4 -4,2 0.04 18.3 24.2 0'.2 """"'"".J'.'~~~'4&þi3'Ø¡4......,;r-'9"'1"\Wi~*'~A""""~ 'eJ3. W_Ol"1.\"'" ",.', ,,', """."",1"..;..""",."\:",,,,1"""""-""">"""""<'; ; Lëÿ"I'o'S~rvfce ' . 'À Ë "0' A"" .~.. , " e 'è N!P 'Ÿ. 9 ð!l°. DjlJi!91(k )J\'I¡.;¡!aií>!i!íti!il\~3.Ji!.o~'1$.¡ì>žt:q1;i;r5!55~#~¡¡.;~F;¥;~;"\if!::YO:O~~5' 4:!!i .~ ADp.-oech LOS C BAD 10 t~ IOO';I:iIJm I'!J flIY4.\í'ß'M!~IOOmm!:~mlìl¡~I~I,¡;£,».¡n,#!r;K>'..1>'ìtïl ~~¡¡W!,..~'¡)~~ WU!iM!!i!1l HCM Average Control Deley 30,2 HCM Level of Service eo- - , LI)I ~ coo I)~ m m 8(ýmuw~ * \~.Qt¥,¡¡~r,,)~¡¡-t'\..~ '!\!.!r.w;.~ ~m 'r#w£ 'K:~~m~J1tIí\t¡;'~1/.\1ì!(1w.$V!~!I~¡m\!.1!ii¡ll:tlW\J1'J!¡ tJ1~V2l!!.(!)§!~t,:9,~It1:~~til&:q ueu!!;lsfm.e,te~(lby, u p!tre8tT\ ,slgnal'~:'~;:i::' ',;;i¥.J¡t1;:;;.tJ{~~---;;,.,. ~£!N ."."~ y~~tç¡çJ!P.!.C!. t1'iR!!!!'A~~~I(¡>~~m.;f:i4'\, ActustedCycleLength(s) 118.0 Sum 01 lost time (s) ~.l~~Î~! t)t; ~~?~~ 1m fa! 1()f1~í:l~g~~J'~$~ rç: 0; L flY e L:6 Ii 51! &1~i:'H8fj+¡¡:;;;t{¡¡ ¡¡;"~".11. . .' 21181200.4 Page 5 M:\02\02282\Comp Plan emmendment\Synchro\2020 without Weyer ExLSy6 211612004 Page 8 :- THÈTRALVL3-FF51 , ~ ., ... \.111 -. '. \11 t" r II \11 I. lø 'II 'II (Ø !IJ tJ r. ~. r. r. ~ '. ~ ,... 'a ,~ ~ a a -a -a a a a aa a 8 . .. ... 221: 5 320 51 & 320 .1.5 NB RamQ 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuser Way Ex1enslon Study -- ~ - ~ ,!i31!8'.~'~I:!:S, .\j:!)", I:!JR ~,&,!j; æ¡l;t"N 1:\11í,;i'tI':< II; '~?I'\4~!ii!H~'WI1m_m\\!gMlWirti!l\.~-.- Lane Group Flow (vph) 1164 649 1220 525 461 RY1y'!!.5.e)l QkI:..~!!}_~i~t ~r¡'~",~g::¡~,~.£101:~':( 34 ,O,X;¿'t ":. '. ,,¡~;,~I~P;;;~~~&¡,t4:t>\ì.¡$fíìIl'J~I:Et',1 Queue length 95th (It) 138 26, 84 481 413 ~~~'2!~m§1.J~Z2'C!~,)'?J"1'312'$' . "<:t"'::1;"f?':""~;':h'1,1!X~1::'~:t't4:1.gt!¡~~~t!" 9511Vtri9' r &:: 5U1.roe; l'li) ,,>o¡;':"'~ '~" '!i" \~ J : .~,. 'f"üm'ãirtëñgth (lif """","':C'"Ú;Ô' A""""""~ ~.!YJBI~;[ffLðl~:g:;<"iÿ;;J~'y;m36~;n'29%;¡~T' . 95th Bay BlOCk Time '" 4% 3-(% 30% !?!!.4.1J1!l 0 ~~ Æ.r:(i(E!D)~'~".!~7~aB;a2E?'-15j}I';~'i;:'C.;:;;:~;:;;)i¿" 'i;~gyì~.æ ((II ege:coo 11t~ m ~tm;¡¡l,~~J'¡~;¡¡¡m~mffi@u,:,~~~.~I,\\>~q"""¡¡.~¡dfÆ'it@~';tI,'1iW¡;\j ~!b\'j,\IiW!I\!").I>.ti@~M~~ !j¡\\'M',..j t 221: 5 320 51 & 320...1.5 NB Ramp 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemeeuset' Way Extension Study .,) 4 ~ ,'I' - ,"'- ~ t ,.. \; ¡ MOye rn enl"'~~~~St¡¡¡'fflI!E:tSL'J,1W.l:l:t,!t;'\t,1: B 1;<1f>\iWBl..W!, \IVl::I,1 AAYVI: tU¡~IN B r.~NN!:Sf '~IN I:R'¡ff;w,~1: I:'i~~ I:JI!\ t) BR leneco~~g.:!r:~~':~'e~1~1o"'ar """,', "H1>..-!, , ", \4+? ",.,...,,' ," r~~CW{V"'.. ""J:,'~',:,:.,'-C';,i",~"."S~~,19Ö(j.;:JS~, 1900 J1!M'.1~~oo:;.1I,~,9ð:J G-ede{%) 1% .1% 2% 3% õ'õralTõšt"!"""eì~í'~'~';"I'~C!",~5.0t;!fW;t.",~.~~"5:'O'.'{],~~Wc75:~ ' 5.0 "~~"::";"'c'<':(~~~"~~,,,¡~ L¡'~e -U~iI. Foc'c" o',eB 0:86 0,91' 0,95 0.95 . F'S5""'.D'~'~-es'"-::'r. ""':';'1"""...~~~\O~:¡¡T!21~:~O:99S!~1!;'~~t;4î';0ö' 0:97' ,. f":~~. P~d!~;~es 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F:'f~:":' ".:,--","","""'~::"-~", ,.o.~'O;g5Æ'!';,~1;"'O;98;;\,iUi-7¡;;j"r.0ö-' 0,88' F:¡ørc";~'éle1' ' ", 1.00 1.()()""'" ",00' . ""0.95 0,99 ;!~!g~:;~~~.:t>~:'7":"~fw.?~oi;Y"'í" '~6;':'F)~"!¿~~~: ~4;~:". Sã':~rcW'r~~ ~ ;~:,:":~,': ':;;(;;7'~'n',,~~3551j¡":1:;r;;;;; j50.í5'io¡j<i)Hi&'-"';(f...íM'ftj' .1'499"';' :"'oil rr}<:;;;'7]¡~Œ~r!1:"'J*,¡ Vc'u"'e(v-.~) 0 1112 901 01063 157 615 0 371 0 0 0 Ï:'..m:~"5ü f:r ilë':ð' r; 13 D ":. ~ : ~ ~ ~f\OOy}\'1':OO:;::';1:'OO~~;OO¡¡'D' 1;CXT¡-:;;1, 'OO~:I:00 1J~. oo,~" o1WQ A~i.Flow{V"'..~) 0 1112 901 0 1063 157 615 0 371 0 0 0 []! ~ ëJ; 'ërJ5 ~ ~J ðW:íŸ? .rA~ ¡¡; ~ 1.1 . ~~q;112 20;m:aO J!'/.!52~$;F\" 8 ~ ~~!\ì O~ u.F~~~ cO".n. Peds. (e,':>r) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 R A . e,.:C,AS %k~.,.~r'~%,."~"'2~~\~..:2~1:\::1!I~J%'iR'!1~%;¡~!t1!¡¡~~",g,"f:¡;1%:~1i1,1W"~1'"c~O I(%' ,"m T}'Oe Free Split ~ rëtë.a ~ rn ~~~::-,."" "'l¡;.. 2.': ;~"- ~wr ð.;:'~~~ ;~¡::'!Wi ~'.~f~~~':~~B_'Œ "~r:ni~ed Phases ~ree Aë!\i1i'!'ðit.: crrõê"¡;~<T¡š)' ~ ?::':' ~:, .eÐ::! ~faj~f~g;,Y:~13 ~~3;¡b~,~.rf?)f ,: :31I7. .t~i~ð':3r.'B!~ii.~~ ::!'ec~!ve Gre.,. g (s) 69.3 116.0 69.3 38.7 38.7 AC'!Jij!ëd:cî/C: ~ ÌlIIO;¡¡.~<': ;;IT'~o/,eo ~ ;qo~J'i%!~f;~:60-¿-})~~;;0:~:2¡i;~e; ;(";~'{~¡.~ C'ee~"ce ,'..,e (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 ~5!"o"f"s,ÿ",'7'","~2:C~i"..~ '$<,!t~2:0;í{+:. ZO'E.*.'2:0;?i4"~!'~¡V~~.~ lnneG,?Cap{vph) 2839 1355 2996 532 474 ';!'J~ B ~ o.ær~! ~~~,.:~,:~..:>:t: ~ ¡ 'l;.,:. ~~,2~ .¡";:i.~~JtjjA\,:!$¡¡!,';,'¡;!!i2~~'i1~¡3m$:o::rt;~:'fjv\%P;~~¡:¡¡~<~~!lJ v!s Ratio Pe~ co. 53 , Iir::':~j,<Nif-~;tr:.'~ ..~'.~.~~"::,, a.'~ .T, .. Ii P::~~O7':'it¡¡¡:S~~o.;~~O:g¡:':~~f¡~1»~~~~ Ur;'o~ De'ey. d1 12.5 0.0 12.4 39.4 39.2 P.~1-_AC:9C,"".."",~,¡ ,,;¡i;;J. u :,~!J ",:,1 '~"~~~99Jifl!J.~PO";~,'I1~~¡¡~~~¡¡.J:.!<U~~"\'W l~cremen!8r ::>,rey, ~2 0.4 1.8 0.04 '35.2 34.0 ~ 8 S"""'~'-""';-:'~-""""':;~1'~,,"'1""'~r"'3';9>"'" "1'I'B,',,3'!'J~!i',"\'<"', ",,"'" ~~._.'1""~'-"""""~'Rwl~ .'...,..,>.",.~'!'Iö",~I;;¡",;;';,f\,.~j1.Iii,..""mz.A,"',~"""",,,~,.^Q'I:'... , , LeVt'.1 or Se'V'c! A A A E E -~~ if!. ~ æe~; ~e! ~, (S ) ~,~, ê;'~"<'i<~o'i¡"';:, 9_" ::;,-t~~j~5;Nr4íiÀ".'~~;!!:Mi6\';1If~1~Vn~~~~"\7.3:9~~~.%\!'~ ,A.=~"::ec~ LOS A A E .. ¡¡,' ~m ~>< , ~"""'"'" ,mm"'m,"">""""", ~"M W,~, '",'" .",,'" , 3-FF51 Page 7 . g:;:ï, ", 0' ~ n'" ""'" '" """<>"""""'~9.'.1I\\""'I(¡>.\.~RI..~hiHnml'¡~~~Ji HCM Average Control Delay 20.3 HCM level of Service C fí c:;» Sit! ~ .. ~ [ q¿ , ç.! PÆ)!. t)" .ra .. II () Jìi, 'fI.a\"~tí¡fMig¡:! , 5JI¡; .. i-a¡;Zjÿ ~ ~ !: ~ i !1' t ;£ ~ 1)., T i );iJ ~ 1t Actueted Cycle Length (s) 116.0 Sum of lost Ume (s) 5.0 IÐIe~...~~t1i¡¿al:J!~l~;t¡JI!!%!I!~D~,J,j~Ji~¡¡æ1iJCOicrèY:èlXò~~ê'Ç9!Cè_,t.;~1:1F\)',?',}k~P:'~~~<1~1~, c C~tlC8llene Group . .... -" M:\02\02282\Comp Plan smmendmsntlSynchro12020 without Weyer Ext..sy6 "I', - : 211 ðl2' ~ THETRAlVl3-FF51 ., - - -~'~'--'ø'.'ø'ø. _'.'ØIØ~'..'.IØ'Ø ø.. 0_0 " . . ~ IJ . . .. . ~ 41 ~ ra..... - .~ - ~ t 222: S 320 St & 32 Av S ./:: 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study 222: S 320 St & 32 Av S ;/ 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study ~ ") f - "-. ~ t ~ \,. ~ .., ¡;'lOve m en\'m¡;~11J'....'!'I_!I.,.E6tm¡'~!\Et:!;Jjffi¡!:t:!~~V'lt:\U!f',,'IV!;! lìì& vvtJl:t~N B~WJ,N t:!,I,í'41} NB!:t~lì:> t:! I},~\~ t:! ¡,m::otIIJ Lane Confi uratlons . tt+ ;;,"i ttt+ ,,""'" . "i ';'".."i' t+ '. . .'. B,~.~,;~;!?JgOO;]"ft900"~~~'OOlf¡1!j(5Q¡F..,lMCln"'9t1O,:Yi..f9ðö~~~1~ 121112121112121112121112 9J!!..a. ~I.(~)~;.~~~~ ~*,~¡'x!g¡rf;;: ~:!V'; o,!;;;~~~j:Jf;~'" ';~:3 %~'~Xê.:Ii~;~:~O~~ To\al,~o.t time (s) . .5.0 , 5.0 ,", """"""5.0,..",?0"",,q,_. .5,0"" ~,O..,."..,."",- ~.o, ~..o !1PJ1.Ií¿UJm¡r;~r~}1..k~fiPJ~¡i¡;Q;gJ1~'I#š!";;!\¡'<\fl.T;oCl','.;,O,9t,<-;!i\~.¡.,.,\\.O.9,5...'" 0.95';.;h~'f"" "';,.;f'ðO'.B'f.Oð;!IJ.~ Frpb,pedlblkes 1.001.00 1.QQ I.QQ 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 ~!~.5~þ èdlfil ~ ~ ~J~~t~~¡q9.æ.1.ìO?h':¡\;m~i~J, t50:;T?<1)150~~~if' TOO';!' "'1'.1)'ð¡¡"fii>}?!J.!§;1 Team:. 1':00. Ì'Î.1\t~~ Frt I.QO Q.99 1.QQ 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.92 Fry"-röIRtei:!:. \:~¡j!f¡;'i¡Jff%~,a;r¡5;"fN6',!t!<5~1R71~O:95'~'1;,00":;;;ê\';;;r~riŒ95';{' 0:98.",;;..",":),¡.;-o.g~itf'.oa&;:!~ SA~~. FIC'WCpr~t) 1770 4828 177Q 48Q9 1693 16M. 1755 1853 F;!'Pi!r?-:~"'d :.':;~.'9,,~t~li~~'!!:\'(';:O:95 ";"'1:00'";'~:';':::'?;2?:iÖ:95'" C5:M ";?:".";:~1;ro:g:5';,~4':Oöm;,{.;~ SD~~,FIOWCD~r-n) 1770 4626 177Q 48Q9 1693 16M 1755 1853 Y.9fu~ e (v;¡ ~),,)" ~2~.~.i~.~IfI!~9§o~ljiR'Ut.6.äJ$,9?O,t~343~2' 2,L'j(ßO,'.t,~.t', 2,;,;,* ,,7) li~)S.4 8~.~ Pea~.hour!AC'.or. PHF 1.00 1.QO 1.00 1.QQ 1.0Q 1.~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ ~w: í yo; ~ J .~1~1i6"~ 2;¡'¡tm¡~~t6~~'~9~i'ÃÌ¡"íî2~Z;':2¡:::Y{,a O:r~1'2~~~1~ Lene Grouo F!cw (vph) 245 1238 0 6 1062 0 142 142 0 177 106 0 Cõf.n~ s':;!f. ~ !I~1p~fq !p~Jæ¡¡~~104':¡;¡m~~J~~¡!J-' q.\~~~h 1.0 þ:J{t1& 1. IT MI~ E!us E!loc~~Çjes (lI~r) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 7. ~)j; Y';. 0 ~;;.,! i:--fl œJ_~tì1~i1,'~ e!.~ì~¡~,¡~.~~.SP IiI ¡;,'!1it};7f¡~';)~';';¡} JiilÇ¡!$p 111~ Cr~teC!ed P~ases 7 4 3 8 5 5 6' 6 F'ir"rrffi ! ~ë:f ?f'lÌ; eè~~~~'!M,o;~~1ir~!!iß(,'tfi~"~1:>;,'F:;:Y,;::Bñ"t ?,%:!( ;~~~~~ Äc~'ua'ed(;',ee";:(3(s) '23,5' 65.5' ~. ~2.Ò' "«.Q' "' .'-13::r'13~3"'- . "15.2' 15.2 E~~~:f~ ~'1t<g¡;(~ )~J.5..;'E1~~ßì\lç~oy)fr SO¡~i3t1~;:f 3:3_~ .~~1~¡_~ AC'.u8~edg!C Ratio 0.20 0.56 0.Q2 0.38 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.13 ~ãfi ~ ,T r'ñ ol'('s !~"l~M¡Þ~,\Il~~£~j;¡¡,~~~:O,';é~~'{ 5 xO'~Äœa$',~;;li',; 5 :O;:y::~~~~ 5; ~5'.~ Ve~lcle EX'..nsion (sj 2.0 2.0 2.Q 2.Q 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 lore. Grp.CAp «;op~}~t'#M,¡349~~g26~~~~ii;;¿'%l1¡,M824,.,(~.}\{,'«,'(~.t~t,,19t ,'..~;;"""';.iÿ~230W:\"ì21;¡~it:i~ v's Ra~lo Crc~ cQ.14 0.28 O.QQ cO.22 .0.08 cO.09 cO.10 o.oe v!J:.!;<a~;óPeMi"t~~~-~~7¡¡.'i~i,::< ;'::;j;¡¡,?";'??"";I1J.~;1.;I{r ,<,."';;;"J.;.';';:;U~2~~';'~ v!~Ra~;~ 0.68 0.45 0.19 0.58 0.73 0.74 0.77 Q.49 u'i,rC':11 D~'"ý, 'd,1r:~¡~m,~2;~2.;~mrt&?ß1~iÄM:2 "28iZj,:.;;;'~'i;il1!7;~9.B".' 49.7 '¿;::;Kt48~'WK4~:8~~ "roo"ess;c,FActor Q.88 0.6Q I.Q21.01 1.001.00 1.041.08 r ~è?é'"> ë~! II r D ë'àY1i'ßZ.~.~:!J:~j~.~Z,\\\",,~)j~'TI;¡,;')"'f;3;,~~~1;':8;ii;12:8;~7~(;"~ ::>e'Ay Cs) 4Q.4 9.4 58.5 30,4 61.2 62.5 ~; ~ 5" é A _'¡¡iI<~¡;ffíic.~6.~~l',ii¡~,E'.¿£!Z¡[C'(~\?E~Jø¡E?; ,":::E:~3~"¡'i!,\, !'.cp~a::.~ Deley (s) .14.5 30.6 . 61.8 I~~ c.');L 0 ~ie!!(.J¡ii"Vìl:¡¡'~~_¡ CT~~~~..¡f; E;.'ri\'t "'." '211612~ . Pege 10 M:\02\02282\Comp Plan ammendmsntlSynchro1202Q without Weyer ExUy6 THETRALVL3-FF51 I Jc .. I '~~'."('\".'a'DrQ'ø 1111 III 'f 'ø '/ '11'11 '( ,(( ( ,IJ 'd '(I tJ '~ ~ . . (II .J (i i .. it 'it'~ ~ 11:-'1-1 223: S 320 St & Weyemaeuser Wy S ./ -. 1" 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study 223: S 320 St & Weyemaeuser \^Iy S 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study - ~ t ~ \. ¡ ~ ./ - ... l' - "-.. ~ t ~ \. ¡ ~, ~~. ~ ;j'Ql1p_t:t:!L"!i!1iEl\ J~JyV!JI.~fWB¡.~rn;~~~NlI h'!1\'N~8¡;¡~~lI,~ff~!(~B~1!'!knt,mi.¡¡¡;H{h!:; .e-e3roupFlow(VPh) 26 1305 272 783 101 105 302 88 28 121 ::;".~~.~)mp;7:::"g;¡~<:¡~~1: ,~. 38 ""; 16'~" 8b""~~~'{:::'e'3:~Fo/20~~: 0 ,~i;iì;" ,~\<i!7", ~': :.:-,.0 Length 95th (1'\) m12 382 102 92 133 137 78 108 45 53 ~;:~~~p~~~;;74a :::~~ti;P50"":.~!( ;::>:'180 ~":;\)7[!?~:~~I~i:{; 25'e]:,;l;r:,~,!w.~,¡¡;[:i¡J; ,; ~!~.Jþ;'BJ~:iJJme.ØJ);;~;~~77'.~::;:'g?;;';i:, ";~"~:::""ë" ":'~:":"':':::~;::¡:,;::i:,'~?:'~'7i:IT~::'~ ',,- ¡¡ey Length (1\) 200 400 300 !':"':~;,e.§[I)1~.::.~',':'¡I,!,\:-::::;\';:::;f';,~:,';:c';!",B:';; .. ~"',.., ":"";.:'7:":";::';;;':':~'\r:7.'~¡:¡:;;::;~:P" ¡;~.- "ey Bled< Time % ;'.?"ìg:!L~tli~f:;:::;i:;;;:;~;);!::¿~::(':',' "T':""'!'.~:',':1;fu<';t':;:;;Z;1~':':W,:f':\'Ì"JJW"'i,~;:'" I rn ~ ~ m aty!:F,~j~!!I :¡¡t'i&T,~, ;/:'." 'j ~ "'. i.';~;<\~ ~{[$;:;'Y di{; ,,~,,\; ¡¡; \.J '),i.,~i~' ':<f.~.l-i.~'~,~ \~~¡¡,r."'~'M~\ %1(;~1M.t~~! J¡i.Ij!1*,')-"i',.\J mn.'{.~g!!ie.J.ç@?'!QJ~:!!.~ijfe queue Is,meter:ad ,by upstream signal,., " ~';'¡"i~:,;:":'>.+!,F<r;'1.~j'.:~:;::'Bi?¡6r¡¡';,~,!?¡'\:,;:: f,;Iõ1;iijffi&nI~'~H"\t@N'¡I'iEBL\~1'!i cl\,[,m¡ EIòK\;1'Y'lllJt,,¡:WB r:J..WBHI\¡1Nlòl;::'i:NB~R"!'!.4,SIò~4,:;lI r;~~5BR Lane Configurations!'itt1+ ,,!'i tt¡. '", , " ,'14' r', '1 , t l' la~lôVnilPñpl)'j![:I;:r7'J'9~1¡r9<XJ6~!)Oð'P:f9oo ':: 19OO"J 9ðO:Y;'19bO 19OO19OO"'19ðQ,,;",',19~~ Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1:õfã1}!'MJìfifi'è"!(!m~IT.'~~:O~~BhÄ;~S:O-:'5:0'?7J'{'11'3:' 5:0' . .. 5. 0 ;:'[5.0 <t(F 5;'O"!.~'5:m!':t! Lane Utli. Factor 1.00 0.91 1,00 0,91 0,95 0,95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F;rpDi\p¡¡a¡fj1Kê?'J¡;:\;?;;;r,'i'Z:nmT:¿!p,9g~'7;~:-'~{JOiJ":'l:OO":"":;:':;Z'!rÖO" 1:00" :'O:99""1:00't~'r~~oo FIPb,p"d/1)ikeo"~ 1.001.00"'100 1,00 ' 1.00 1,00' 1,00 1,00 '1.001.00 .rillìì,i,'f":~~:JJ'!';t';(::;1":'¡J;t,.f;OO~O:¡¡~,"ii'i:,:>!;~'c'l:OÖ, ":':f:ðO': :",,";è::¡Töo" ':1.00"" 'O.85'¿T1:Oð';';rCO~i~ Fh'Pr,(;i~~¡~d'"" ,<",' 0.9S' 1.00"" .,., 0,95 1,00 ,'> 0.950,95 1.00 ' '0.95' 1,00' 1.00 ~r.!õVT;(¡\i'Õ!)';1?7~:;;;f:J7Z~r~]~7,;;1)jki1a;¥~ 7 $9""4$86":r"1'~::J'i1.6$g;' 1,8 89""-1554"~Jï70-¡:'\".fee'3".t~:'ß'~ FltPermitled 0.281.00 0,151.00 0,950,95 1.0a 0,95 1.00 1.00 Sã1a7F!Ow1Þ¡!ffìîffl~,clj(n't2"ð':;1:'47471'i7'i:';1'9":Y271' 4MS) , "7:':..':-\';tf$'M' , 1 889 'i:-1554,O/;f710'?'M63'fF"fss::1 Volume (vph) 26 1094 211 272 746 17 201 5 302 86 28 121 l?èã~:~ôi,jrJilc1õr7RB~;t:r;qQ'fJ.~t)à.;rl"f:lJa;:;:q:f;ð(r:" 1:ÖO'",¡;j;OO~r:ÖOi;': 1:00 '7:1 :00 ~:1:0Cl"i11J'00~.:r;~ Ad). Flow (vph) 26 1094 211 272 746 17 201 5 302 86 28 121 i:1!i'\ë;GIi5!JP" ~JõWT¡m1ìœ.!"2'5'f;~:¡O5...!rw\:,~",~27 2i'~:"7 63;:;;::'ß~1 a1r::-ç105~J'3 02,~8g~2~ Conn. Peds: (#lhr) , »- '10' '10 10" 10' "10 10' " 8üšT8Jða<!lg'ê'š"'JIf!ffi'J;i,',:;;)!::?Tq---'- Tum Type pm+pt pm+pt ,Split pm+ov Split Perm eIõ!¡¡çté(!";Jiã'§:és_~;1~~JJ¡iI1ZÄf:Û)1~'Jf;'N):1:':;i~;:eZ:::1;¡:;;1~:~¡:e ;" :,:',:' g ';;Q'.,;,!1'?i7~i¡'.f.J.'1~~;,1!¡,¡(,Jir~ Permlt1ed Phases 2 6 8 4 ~]~1e¡¡~~~~(a)%'A:;¡,,4ði7iZ¡Ét1~7JI£:Y1!();i~f'i+7Ö:O;:17'Ö :ö'"I:~j;'r:~':'};~r;ff¡~'" 1 1;1,':37 :11)3 cr:lrnà~ cr.,e1£J.fJ.. f Effective Green, g (s) 48.7 46.7 70,0 70.0 12.1 12,1 38,7 10.6 1o.e 10.6 ~&];WQl13ìíU.ò'],\!iì:.¥j,ti;O::19.~t~,Pi1Pl'i't'¡:t:~'ì~eO'l¡;';O :60C(~l):;'1"[Cr,fq;,: " '0',10 .1';~;0:3:j::'[O :O~'DT0'þ91-:~P'.0'3. Clearance Time (0) 6.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 6,0 6,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 V'è!\fdð'rnä1îsfõ1i" ,0}"'N2;O~17;~,hV."i2:0'(;¡',2,'0~"1F~2:0'F' '~r2,'O..t~:Z:O,,(~a~2.u";¡","\'2~O LaneGrp Cap (vph) 247 1911 507 2948 174 178 518 162 170 145 ~!m:t@11'.iEõ,t'¡¡gi;m¡¡tt~¡BJ.Q:ggI!.\ç,o;2!.;~'iI[,"'ì11J~!{a¡r2';;": 0,1. ß ¡;;:;¡¡1Ä.¡~O:be 7' . CO:O 6;r:èO~f Z1f,1ro:(J~~- vis Ratio Perm 0.04 0,20 0,06 cO.08 (íZ5J8:ä\!èì.f\"¡lì¡¡;;m"t,})i.11jiW,;g.~;;;;o :Jl'21J¡'J.Q, !.J8m£õ;;i;;¡'~70:'54~?~0':26\; ';; .::;t1;¿n-'Œ58~:::co:eo G::0~58::1'iO:5~o;,,:m0:'J!3. Uniform Delay, d1 21.3 28.5 24,1 10,8 49.5 49,6 32.0 50.3 48.6 51.8 '=ì'òWëš,!rõñ'F,ðëfõ(!;',~;0;3.!1:'ii"dD:'57=:TI"jz:C' 0; 5 5",:,:' O. 81'~f::'T..~i).~ 1 :00:': :;1 : 00 ::-:::1: OO'J:r;f. OO,~rOo;:r:JtT,O(J Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 1.8 0,5 0,2 3.2 3,8 1.1 1.7 0.2 30,7 DãfáYj( !Ínif(~1i~;:i!\~5'i;:f:11ffi48 :~2¡~1.g;a~,!:;¡}?\RI3: 6' ¡',C, .'. 6: 8 'g;¡¿¿'è;~%:52:75; ", ,53 :2'E33:1.¡:::::r.52':0~@:81'r~SÃ;e Level of Service A B' BAD 0 ~ Cì-J-I D F ~ãþIj.1oeràÿ';'(!)i11j'i1;J[;¡'!;Þí;;,)'E\K1¡¡;;aw;:,'if...;~;::.r:'7C(:¡ ::';t: 8 .8'<.;;;f¡¡IfC(!,%¡';:'2:;: ' :4:1; 1.:,i1):!D';~S'6J:~Â}1~~"'i Approach LOS BAD ~....,; E HCM Average Control Delay 22.3 HCM Level of Service r?TC""'\""',i5Imm'fìè'JIa11C~~âUO¡kå";'W,""" 07am;,/,-.'..t"T'Ii..¡q'~"'t\l';i\%~~;m;¡:!?'<)~"..""~1'W~m" ' ~~'~!ò¡;F.""";"¡ ~cit"'Yât;dC,Y¿I'~tê~~¡~'h,',gr,"""",",',',N,'"' ",","'r1ã.ô-,,',,',":,"","",,"s~,'rii,~~,ì'~;,;tif'~,,~':'~)',', ",',',',"',..' C,,"'.",',', 2",'",,'Ó,",. '~.~,' ',"",'~ """"", "',',,"', "'"" /===="""-"""""';1"'111 \l6ì1 ~ß"""'~"'tcU"""I""""'-~>"""""'" """'"",'^,",',..... _.m" n'p.r:~""o,n""apaçl.'I,,.V' za,:'¡{~i¡¡¡,;¡;¡¡" , ,:;';',1':(:" ,ceveo";>ery,oe',.,i,:,'"';,,,,,',':-, I ;)',',:¡,~ C Cr1tical Lane Group I ~ I-'~ ~¡~tìrf'1"I,'¡¡!.."':;~)~"\¡tI',~I~'J;iJ;;'f¡¡:!¡!"" :~~, :2116/2004 Page 11 M:\02\02282\Comp Plan ammendmant\Synchrol2020 wi:hout Weyer ExUye :211612004 Page 12 THETRALVL3-FF51 .c: .. - - - - --_...Qø..ø.øø...øø...~~~~" -.- 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Ex1ension Weyemaeuoer Way Ex1enolon Study -.- 224: S 320 SI & Milita~d S ./ ~ (" ~ --.. t ¡ 224: S 320 S\ & Mili\a:x.. Rd S ./ 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Ex1enslon Weyemaeuoer Way Ex1en51on Study .; ~ ¡ .; \.. '- . I ~ ~ ~ ..,. (" -.. ¡;:¡!!J:IÁ~¡¡~~<:Bt-'1¡"(!: I:J(;~!: B~B~~mrmt(¡:¡eR;l;¡r.S8~:Rí\S8 J ;;¡¡'w~B K;iJ~Mj;H Lene Group Flow (vpn) 103 1164 215 234 1091 123 126 78 215 256 150 ç¡~.1J,ðei¥~~~;:<~JlV;$,g1R7'1O~"'7;?;~O'I~,';1 M" 'I SO ','q,,45'7':'"'91":";:~:07Íê":ì517'!;tJe2'::~~~;;~r"" Queue Lengtn 95111 (II) m132 164 6 252 252 77 151 44 223 264 73 t!J1ë.rfè!;~f2ì!JJ~);~'¡'~~""'125O',"\';""";',:' ;~: . 427 ',' ",' ":5Oe"::'7,",":""","':,~;';,,:'270'3~~:-;TCT' 50th Up 810C!< Time (%) 9!fh'!Jþ;B1~d"{'¡Wr""7"" """"'7"<'1""',"- tuni8ey(ën'~IÌ(ti) "':'200 ",; ""200 5Ollf~f~'Tímê:'~:;"i;":~'Y1%;'::i':;:O';B"'i' ¡ïstJi'eaýê'loc:ninÏe'oÁ,""" '3% " 20%' g\J.!!P!~r~&D.~i))W;!?:B':"~':;;: f"::¡:'i;:, .;~4~"37,' fi\è%ffianl '"~;,,~t:1~¡,),,,"';¡:"'<E~r;m E BH 7'. ,', WB!!1)iWS ì'c"::WBR !rn'NSI.!r'.N'8"T"";~1:J l!.,'~S I:J rM.'itiBR Lana Configuration! 'j ttt '(' '\ Hi- '\"i t '(' "i t r lðêårF'rôw(vp~ì5lì'1";:",?~'lM07-:;lOOC7'lMO 1900"1900 ,. '1900'1900 1900 1900 '100c',~'1900"'rf~ Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Tôíàf[óst tlmif(sy"."""" 5:0~.OT"~5.0 '5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 50" "'~':5.0""':"õ:O Lìme Uti I. Factor , 1.00' "'0,91 ".00 1,00 0,91 0.97 1,00 1,00 1.00 '1,00' 1.00 FrPb:'þì'¿ìb¡kë,"T~~' "1:001'~rfbö:'~è1.0Ö' "too ,. 0.99 . r . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00'"1.DO~i ,',O:'9g Flpb, pedlbiKe5 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 F'r'f":',',::C:::;P':'"'t':'"'7":f.OO;:;.;cnX)çÖ:85 :'1.00 "0,95 "'1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00',:1.00',7: OM FI\Protecled 0.951.001.000.951.00 0,951,001.000,951.001.00 Sã\'d;'F'JõW'(pfõlr;;:.æ'~;1~55:ri39'1.g1?'\583: 1770 '4651 ' "3433' 18631583' 1770',e'1M3"":'\540 Fit Permitted 0.951.001.000.951.00 0.951,001.000.951.001.00 Sã!ð:'F'l6w(i5êìTl1r7"'i"'"I75~g'18"'T1M3'1770 4851" ""'"~j3 1863 1583 1770':';"863'\':1~ Volume (vph) 103 1164 215 234 762 329 123 126 78 215 256 150 f"êãK=hoì.iflOC!ôì';J'RF':DT'l,OO~~OOtt~)JjO'[":l:OD ,1,00""; 1.00':;" 1.00 1: 00 :.1,00: ,:,1:00"',17:1 ,~tf.~:OO Adj, Flow (vph) 103 1164 215 234 762 329 123 126 78 215 256 150 ¡:¡\ii'ìÇG'fôù'P:FÕ\Ï¡'iVj51j)r;:f:1'(J3(ñ:1"54~1~t'j::234 "1091;:pr:îO':~;123 ' 126 .', :,:'78:'::T215';'.~256,]'!~I50 Conn: Ped5.(#/hr) . 4" 10 10 '3 3' 3 ButÌ'B1í5êRiíôe§'(Ií~fì""f~rt1¡?2~:~'O'i"";F"0 "'?"O' . 2"","""2"',:;" 0 '0: '0' "n'O:'l""'i~'O~~'~ Turn Type Prot '.. Perm Pro! Prot Perm prot" "perm prorêCte(Þhäs'ê.~?{::'::::'"~:75m1f;':':17.':';':';:'" 1 6 ' : ,,- "'3 8 :"7'}7"'41f""~< Permitted Phaoe5 2 6 ~ líé!üiilêdGréði'\:G'tšn;-..'10;ð;;;'¡~5:ð;;:"43:6'c:19.655.6 ' :;:8:0 11.1 11.7,17:1;"'.20.87:',20':8 Effective Green. Q (0) 10.8 45.8 45.8 20,6 55,6 9,0 12.7 12,7 17,1 20.8 20,6 AEtÙritèdg/C,¡:¡iit/o.:;:"L"'0:OSij-::i'°:3"9'-;;':,0.39'0.18 0.48 "C""O.08 0.11' 0:11 0:13'-:~O.18Ñ}~0]':e Cleeranca Time (5) 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 Vêhlêlé'EXlênslôn(šj"',,¡:":2?OTIi'm2:0T"'."2,Ö" 2.0' 2,0" -,,:; 2,02.0 . 2.0 .2:0,t~;~:'2,O"(m,;,z:o Lana Grp Cap (vph) 160 1932 622 314 2229 266 204 173 261 334 276 v/HfáUoÞibC ':",~"". O,06'~-¿¡Y.24T'Zi'f":'7, cO.13 0.23 .~'D,04 0.07 'êO.12:'tO.1.ry::U;v,' vloRatioPerm 0,14 0,05 0.10 v/ë;"ReUb""i")";",'" "'.. 0:84~¡',0':80::;-O:35 . 0,75 0.49 . 046 0.62 045' 0.82 ';:O;77',:;:cO'.5-4 Uniform Delay. d1 50.9 28.0 24,7 45,2 20,5 51.2 493 48.4 46,0 45,3 43.3 P{6';j¡ê..lonF.eclotY':-D.9Q".f~..l:>:.48èJ:'0:13'.1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 '0.66:,'0.90::;,0.74 Incremental Delay,d2 5.3 1.1 1.2 8,1 0,6 0,5 3,9 0.7 15,6' 7.9" 1,0 DêTaY(š)i':'i'~Y ',' '\5f:D;",':';13:9j7fJ¡;4:5,';:53A 53.2 :AQ"l, "58,0';¡(48.5'~i;33:2 Leve! of Service DBA D D ',0: ì E ' D' C JÎ¡5rèõâclì'Dëray(ŠR17'TF;;f~15:~~;'~;-:'; t... 51 . 6 ",~ ":~: 48J¥J~ Approach LOS 8 D r'~ D ,- _w' l ~ (61'š àbi 10 ~ '¡SO r:r¡ rñ aIY,¡~"m \'R~¡;.Wi;\',~1ìm~.'i,"":¡;-; p"~~l,>~('K~Þ,~!),:.:,'1.':;,{',~w.,¡l;,~t~W~~':';¡,,~,~,);&J:'£' ("XNi¡~uq HCM Average Control Delay 27.9 HCM Level of Service C ,,"- HCM,volùméfô,CáþiiCitYraUôj!'ili¡;;n::::0.88 , '.. :,.;,'.' ':~,,¿:' ,', t~1""~'v.1'1,':"';:;!;~~~ Acluated Cycle Length (s) 116,0 Sumoflo5ttlme(o) 15,0 '",' 'rirêišeêUóri'CiipádtýOtillfã\l¿¡¡""",~;",70.7%" ICULevelbfServlcê .C '",u:J:~:;¡'~."7:T~ c Critical Lane Group -1- M:\02\02282\Comp Plan ammendmant\Synchrol2020 without Weyer Ex1. oy6 I 2/1612~ ¡ \ Page 1~ THETRALVL3--F'F'51 &. , ~\ mZt¡¡~~ùmeJ.<?~,~?Jœþe~ntile,queue i5matered;by upstream signal. .. "',íi\"' 2/16/2004 Page 13 - - - -- - 234: S 312 SI & 32 Av S 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuser Wey Extension Study - ") f - l' '\ r,lQV'!!rt1!t!1I~r.!W 11t~f::.tSK'~ YVtS~~,vytS¡.;,,~N!Jur¡¡¡f'/!J ~~¡~!~~iWä\~,,~\;:¡~\tl&I'lf¡Y;~jjj(¡M:r4 Lene Confi;unltions '!'¡. 'I '!"!' 'I. r' S~~~.!í,1..~~r.FJeë2" :':';.'7:"~':~,l",ree-: ' S!ò'¡}~m;Œ:;~!Sf~f1l:]~¡¡;¡1ž'&;¡~!'i~1í:5!J Gnlde C'~ 2'~ :% ~~_~.t~r~:ì...~,~-l:;:,-'29~ ~:"'~ g~:-::'7:T~~'4J"(" Pe8~ Hour F8C1O!' ~ ,00 LOê: . .:~ ~ ,0: ~ ~~!e;¡~~~~~;;;~2'::~~'~S~'.'-7~~:'f.c7- '. Þe<les!l1e.,s '0 10 ~~!'~X,'.è"t~:¡!1Ö1tÌ:.¡¿~,¡..í;.2.0T.~".':' ~::':-:;:7~n~ -: ~ 2~ö7Æ~;¡1;;;~!t'i'~~¡:f,'..m:t!¡t~!î4tl!im~ We'~lng Søee<l (~s) ',0 '.0 ',0 ~~~ ~'~E~ ~~:~.~: ~~' .~ ~ ~;. ~;~;.,~' ~~ ~ :.~'~::~~~~::~:~;=~:::;:~~=: "'e~i8n s~onlge ve!\) 1 H.!."~,~::u.~~t~ii ~~ ;;-:;::;;-:: -:::;'~~12~:" .~~.":1'il§:ì£î~iÎ1.5"¥.àìi.ì11.C¡tiñijÆ~::;;.lt~ pX, p!etoon unb'OCIced ~.J,~~~~~~ç~.\J¡¡.~r;-. ~:, ',TI'-¿;;:-;;.:', ,~.{g",~~,:'.~ ~::-,... 7I!jJ\j'æ1:5z.JJD.~i.~.m.1\'fdie\'l.~fj,I(j'ili{If&Ü .c1, .Iege 1 co~f YO! ~94 &~~~Q~~~r::r~..iì'i!~~1.""'.{I' 0',), ~"!. ~~~:~'.;:~, ~'-~~~~~œ,~,a~w¿li.Í~$t'Mî!"j¡¡i~'4\~'lít&_í'@¡?f'-i .cu,un~IOCIcedYO! 424 731 257 rc¡11?I~~{.).tit.il~G.)!,t'~....,;.. .,...""-:;;,;~:~';'-:-' ië.'2ïle;e'(S) .. "--"" .. eo, ~_ú1;1,I¡.'I\'."i"j:,;¡,.{-';':'.~:;:"'::'2.2. ,","::;. 0,', 375~~;3T3~\',1"i'~~~"~ll;ì.!!¡~I\:\~tr~1\ilJî~&i"¡;¡¡"_'1¡i~~r. p.Jòueuet-ee% ~"""-"""S3""""" 55"""7t;...~..."...,., ..P,... "'".. ~~~.~ y .lv. ~~ì;:~ ~ E'~?-. ~~':TS: :?,;~, $!f':;,¡1'T': . 4~~&!3P.£1~--_~_v~ D~ "!1M; -~~ ¡ W't\:!>¡~\!~~ ~t1 m W 611L ~ W Bi '3f1,N ~~1 ~f'fë\¡¡¡~lImIr_;¡¡,mr~~J'I4¡'!!f¡g1ì1m"Æ11111~~ ~ý.(!1~@~~ê:~~Zgti!~7,z,l~2?~ ¡g;;'~i202l1î,!~¡..j;",8;i%:~i2.',5_'Iíl~_tt~IIíJtt1!!~iB:¡¡~ VOIumeLel't 0 0 77 0 0 148 0 ~2.m ~ g ~ qa~..8}i~P_~ ~~;;~Q 1ì~ifÆJ.o.D2,'t5~~;ìii~!iíí1iIi¡¡~I~~~iW~BiiiJ ~ . 1m 1m 1~ 1m 1m ill ~ ~ ¡¡ ~ Ç!! P. ~ .cw. imìt ~ EJ2.'I ~ ¿ 6. m P. ;:em m t1 13 iJ4; 0 ~ 1 :¡ ~ 0 ::3 ó;;¡.¡,\"J', ; 2 ~ ~ \1í ¡ . ~ t ~ ~ ;¡ t if ~ g ;æ, ¡¡rid#; 4 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 6 0 0 39 31 P.P1l !£Ef;,ç¡'!1.~.;.c S) ~o.,g r~ö;o.~~(Hl" o~..ö%tè~ö:o;;,!% I àì'1'fr~;1'2~O'iJ1~ßMiø.~;(t4',¡';¡¡¡¡ltf¥.i¡_iì:J~-;¡¡t!j Lane LOS. A C B ~p roaClt\ oe¡ ~¡$ )~¡¡; a . o~'~¡P+1'¡3B¡,jß"':<.tTèAf.!J'¡:£'ß¡58-.~l'wr~ÉI:¥f\tR~'{\l~'é_~~~ Appmàêhlõs" "',',...~ ,." ..' "$, . " .,. .q-_. , B .,,-. ", ".~, ""~"-'.. .°." 1.0 ~ ~ WO!'l.. ~ m BIY ¡mWflJ:!m'.,¡' .:~m .mM;¡:Ij\ }§~;äfm"'JtJ'.,<;¡.1>;¡i¡'i~~k~\m'~IW:I~1f!mmJ!m~Y~îiI!'¡\\1!f¡iM\t.1-I Average Oeley 4.3 tI1~l!!;SJ.2JJ),ç m~w.. Q tJ! lfh1 !~E.~~¡1'4. ¡¡PE$..,;,~",,;¡ 1, C CJ ;Ceyè 1;:0 r;Së'rýT ëe;~~*~..*:w..fS¡,,"f3¡'i!§Ø£i;"~ìiìH_\ÍII,\~ ;gm G')( m:i: - 2/16/2004 Pege 15 ----- -- - .. .. .. .., .. .. ., ., .. ., .., . ., fit . '. .. (l ø'. r¡f~~ 497: S 312 St & Military Rd S 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeuser Wey Extension StUdy ./. t + ~' '\ RIll e ~ ~ 11:><h?ili::£ .~""'~ .:~]:!:!I,.~ .!51H .,<' j' !JJ,,~t'J;.r:! !!;JFMj;~!J¡ (,m~~~~~~~~~~~ Leoe G"OUD Flew (V:>~ì 291 217 319 361 729 O-rnre17'-"'g!,;~~~~(~~{20!""~f'j.a:-17-."1rß?~7i:,226;.r;~'¡.¡~¡jI'.J,;;Y~;'- "',,!' :,.,.,¡::\:~~~~.. Queue ;'engl~ 95:~ i~) -~'3 65 -384 113 322 rnTë~!-rrr~1<7~'~ !!:),~~f!_~.../",~, :'~'::~-$..t\270~P"?':9f~~?';,' '.::;:;:: "-,i1::;...t-:~;i'!:if,.~*~~ 50:!\ Up Bloc~ 7'~e ('~) . ~~;~~;;~~:7~~ {~J~"""',,"',,,;:;.~b~;-:;;;~~::.::-;T:r~.~¥~~v~;7 ',;?:":.,c~¡,~~;~~,~ ~~!!),BsY '!Jlõþk:;ïï ñj e ~.¡, ::;J":'~. ",>i :.-' ,;.::::.: : ~þ~1¡;.;l-F--::--;~~:1R~j1. ;)~~'+.,': :T:~ $:.r:tg,'~?-'; ;'::;;}~}ITfw. ~:¡~ 95!!\ BI!'f B'oc~ -;-;~e .~ C:ü1ffi'.~::"p.ëFiñrfY (ve:;):. ¡~' .~.f(>:.7-::',-':;:..;~:.."~J~}::t:W'::~i::;~:!~~' ;~-::;::;,1'1'{~~ In I ~d n"'!SUm m a ~,-.t !i~~\;':~'¡J¡mh$'-I.m¡",; !.!ì!<!Y ~'~~!>~'i¡;¡¡: ¡¡.7r¡~1i\9j!'À';¡ WI'~~¡IJmtI\,I<!~-!!em #.~,6JI)¡Þ.!!..~QI!I~~.tU-'11~1~~_1i9~èI!l1a~JY.tqueu.e,mI\Y, b~:longe(.~,.d¡.4",:,., ",,: ':"1.;&"'$~Ji~~ Queue shown Is mexlmum efter two cycles, -urn »X G)I fT1 Õ-:= -!.~ .. . M:I021022821Comp PI en ammendmenllSynchro12020 without Weyer Ext..sy6 THETRAL VL3-FF51 . 12116/2004 Pegs 16 , , lc: ..tjø t - - WI' - .., .., ,., .., ., 497:5312 5t & Milita~ ..f ., 2020 WITHOUT Weyemaeuser Way Ex1enslon Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study + ..; '" t bIQW 111 en I~t; I:JL"!>IL1=J!l:t'!:i~tj!!~lli¡jl~~~J¥;JR;:;./:! R~~~!1~}I;!.qJj1>!,;,W~¡;1 Lene Configurallons . "'ì 1f "'ì + [f~afJ~~':"',f;?:;;~iJHr,~.,;~Ð~':'~~ r;'~':~,;:1~:;'~ ?'~~;;~ ,0.81 Los,.. e (s) - - ~ - 5.- - , "!l~:i:I.~~~:~:5:.:.r,:::~:~'(';;:~~::1:~.:~~~ ~ F~~. ped,_'~es ....:...;"< ,.w. , ~- ~~-,pg".¡:?è.s;V~.~;;;~;::!~;~:;:;;:~'V: ;:~~~;:~~.. ~ r::;.f'.,~!~,~q;\.:I.~ !'w'~\:.;.C~S~'f.' :C>C:::-'~:95;:::r.~:Ca . .-: ~'. :O'()~:¡:"dicl.~j¡$1"tßj~ri;~~~t~*'~~,~_1t~ Se'd Flow('rO') .".. ."" .-" ..., '"°1 f7.i ~.!n;-r, ~ ~~.~ :.."; ;;.~..~:ój 5 '::/! : c¿-7: ::3~b~ :t: . ,: .. ::'!J]~rt@:.%tì\;~~'¡;ìJ;W?14f}å11&~1i:í«í$}:~t"¡¡~¡'¡l1i1f~~'¡~ Se~d, FJOW(De~) '~~5 '45: 551 ~S4S '751 Y,g!u.2e~('7~)~~~.:.'t,t\.it:~.29.~ '~"'. 21 7"'-",- ~;.9 ;~. -:~.~~.. '. 52:1¡:¡¡¡í&:2.o?~¡¡;_1¡~\t$li¡ì¡!i~1i!'~~:íii1~!í\\$~~rt~l1i!!:ï.\"j Pea~.~ou".rllC'.or..P~c 1.:: ~.c: ~.oo 1.CO 1 CO 1.00 ~t::'-1.{\ ?;) j !::;~ ~ :).;: ~~, 2~.1 ~~2'.~ "7 ':-:o::~ ~,97?-! ~..:.. .~2~~205;~tí'éÎik.~¡¡¡J'¡;¡ffí;t1J:¡;¡;¡&}if..\;!t1!ìt~íi'*¡~J..~~t;¡¡¡ij~Î!Wl.1!j La~eGroupFlow(V"'wn) ::9~ ::~? J.9 35' 729 0 ç~~~~r.~ ~~~I').~f(,,~,~;~~ :-~'r~ 0 ':~.::' ~ :{.:;~..~:: v.' "'::1qB1,Oà'V~;1';81)!!'?,:;¡i11à:~'j\':~~~~;m~¡i!i~;;¡¡¡¡¡;f;~t1;~£~¡¡¡¡ eus elOCJ<ages (.'~'1 2 2 0 ¡ 2 0 ;:1!:~:;:yp'e;¡;s.~~.~q~~~~J't!"'I~',P~-. . P.~'.~":>".:.: .' ¡~¡!1!i¡:Î!iH¡'Íá¡¡';~f;W'é,~¡!~~'Ji¡Ñ'~t1t1¡¡'5~'Wjli:í¡~TI'î~';¡;ffi!iV&;4:~¡.¥î Fro!ec1ed P~ues' :: 6 ~~,~"ëšS~"'$;V"-:::;-;:~",. ;~-;:'-2~;",~~:-" ACi;¡8~e(iG:è-e;~-G(s¡ ::'~7 ::~:' ~3 ë..t..3 !~~~rl~~:!}::': ~\~:i!:~;;~~;;~:' ';~~~~}~¡œìø~,\f¡;f:,i~1ìì1i&~1¡¡_~~~~~ g~~ :!!12~.~~ If!'. .~;'(~¡~:>JJ~"'.3~,?:":",.~ C'y'~ S:O:JZ'~S:C~: '. ~,1{m"~~r¡få¡r~!¡~þ'~j;;'J6¡~~tfØJf.~mt¡,t,~~ Ver'de E><'.e~sio:\ (s1 2.:) 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 Le~8~GI;(C.ap~(y;,~t'!~:P::8;"",' 27.1 :","22"';.;343:'-' ~ 2g0)(t)~.;"":W,¡',i;t~K!ij;"'E;'¡::;¡¡!1£i'~~.lf!.!~1%[4.~¡!¡1~¡¡"íã~ vIIRe~oPrC'. cC.~? 0.2: :'1 91m.~~~..".e~~"¿I;"':<~~?T.C~ S:;:tC:Ss-..ç;";1:::-' ,.. vIe Re~:o G.e9 ::I eo O.7e 0,27 ( ~~;\1~~:"'~i~é~~r-;~5¿~ :";~:~~~~:~ -:-..~ ~~!:~;aI.~_e!9y,~~¡Q"¡.:r,23:2~':'t~:7::;::~ ~';2:Z::,O.5 ,:~. Deley (s) e9.2 59.e 19.5 '.e ~~.:.:;e.'X',;:;e:<:-i:\.,:.>;;;¡:;.;.~;!.~;":~E"'~,~¡!J~-:-Â';': !'Þproec.~ D~ley (I) 55.2 1 ~.5 .. - . ~ 0 _1?:8.~,-t:Q~~~¡j{,¡~";;;';E :37.':::;: .; ~~¡~ ~.~ ;".,-;' ~~\)1It.~<i¡'~w~Jl',","!jl!%¡!~¡§;¡Y_*~í1 ~ ~ .. ~ 4!\ ~ ¡j\j. I, ~ 'Wi .m \ ~ 1W;il ~ ~ lijlli8í,t ~ ì\.im ~ ~ !:!..~I!1l~~~~lC3):nJ£:é!IjP.!L~S<::'1J':1~,¡i,~'2{2~ :9t.'f.'Iti~jj eM" ii:ev.el. Of . Sðf'llce~c,¡~i;;;'!:i.iiv.;:;\tC~$!Jfìillj:_Al~ HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 ~C!U!teai.C~a)4!1l1g~'r"'¡.F!,IV'.7$,.:;-!\1:1:a70,'~,~,'Sum 'òTJõs1 tlrfíã"'S'~.i:fi".'\,:;¡1¡;",{?,1 O,O;~~]'I:I',i\r;.;,~\r'J-'.1¡¡I4,!if,~ Iniêi1êêi1õí\cä¡;êcltiÜtíIl;aiÎo~ .. '^""86:6.,Ç""ICULe~éïofSè~k;;~ ,,-, 'b-~"'" ...._""-..-.....~ ~~i.Ç!JP~~f~:~i¡;'i':iS~n~~:.~~!.'tr1~Æ:,:-!~!J?ih!~~~)' ~:J;;. 'i1;>:L"'.~i71~:; ,:í;E~;i¡lli';;¡.;),ii(~(~L~ :Þ-X ~:t: - M: p Plan ammendmantlSyncl1ro12020 without Weyer Ex\,,!~ 2116/2004 Pegs 17 ~ .. " . .. .,. . fII ø " . . . . (I fJ . .. .~ '" a ,.. ~ -urn »x G)I mõS 'lQ~~ .--.. ~ 10 \ - - - - - ., .. 222: 5 320 51 & 32 Av 5 .,f MITIGA TED- 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyer!18eu!er Way Exten!lon Study t ~ ~ -.. 1"" - ~ L:8 ~¡~ P ~~:!lt E8 ~~~mf~~:s B\r~>$ B ;r;mm~~ M.;r"'i:'k~'f1!l¿¡Jœ![¥'iì!iì\.~~ lane Group Flow (vpn) 245 1238 6 1062 212 72 177 106 Q!!f¡.B~r~gJU:,~~::r47i'1'Jf'.:tCfJ~l\j~~~!;:~:}s:4'~48¡r:~1',~'f531\~iI~!bfl:J~~!B~~ Queue length 95th (I't) 250 172 m13 287 228 90 m197 m93 11)l~(!I~iJ:)LS!;lml~3o'.i'it'1':~(E;;;;;;',(720;:" :]~~;'~i740'" , ",¡r"., L;fC305 "-:;,~;254g~;%~:;;;r.R';-:g:~;j~fyy[r: 50th Up Block Time (%) ~~ìlf!I~TIme;C~)~!õZ;-'\7K;ç~%¡¡/:;%;¡;7?i.,. ,~-..",.,' Tum Bay lengtn (I't) 100 200 !!iQ!6¡~rog8¡[m\J;:~';{i,:J§~Zi'tl:4 .,,:':;."2~,;¡~;: ' 95thBayBlockTlme% 27% 30'10 31% g!J~)JJt1ó!~~fJ1i~~~~1ir:#¡'{11~;¡;¡~Ï;¡'Jff(i;¡;1:;: , 150 :;;', :¿_5'7;:;;;<1;(';':~~:fi!~:~£~:J1[~~~~~;Y I rn ~.u m m ~~ '1!\W'.<!\:~jJ~,*~?,(itt,~,~;jm ~í:f.1!'~ÍÎ' '~~J£~ ¡þJt(1.~)~>:!;þJ&~\~'if',m¡'¡;<f¥"~¡¡'BY~<.'IœNß!'R~fi !J1~'!(OfgJ!f~;.tCi.t'.9_5.!h..:ø.~~DUle'queusJsm,stere,d~by ~pstream signal; ,,' ;'J,,"-:;:, ':;:Ûi:T¡"ç;¡:f;.:~,t,);::~,r"t>li:ii'.¡¡wt*<", ~m ~)( mA ~:\O2'vJh,,"'comp PI8n 8mmendmant\Synchro\MITIGA TED- 2020 without Weyer ExUy6 , 3-1"1"51 ~ Þ~"""~,, ~ . , ... 2/2412004 Page 1 w '" " '" . ....'" 1/1 . .. . . 0 " .. " "".,..,.- ~ 222: S 320 St & 32 Av S ..f MITIGATED- 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeu!erWay Exten!lon Study \. ¡ .¡ "'- t - ~ 't ~ f ...... ~vøm '&J H¡¡m¡¡;lt.¥"¡¡¡¡~I:~EBm~iE B ~¡¡¡¡~~JlIîiìY{B R~mN 8~¥g1'lB~t3 S".~¡S B 1.~5tJitm::; 6 B lane Configurallon"'IH'tö.. ",,' "I ttt+ " " ,,1+ "i to ~~IôW'(vpñþ~'IJ;ffL¡¡*,fJ ,~~1~ðqID~~¡J¡rt'()?^\1;9ÔÖ7j!lt~j"9OO"'" 1900 ""]\100,,:;:~'1 gOO?¡:¡,l~~J~, lane WIdth 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 (3 raõä:(~hI¡r¡tj¡m'í!;r:~¡it~$.~q'~~~"JRtY7ff;fr:"'?""O%;7'~-'~!:C"; '0~3 'Æ";' '~'",,' "'", ",..\ .~:~~'O'~~~ Totallo!! lime (s) 5.0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 Lãrîè'}J!1I;~.iÎabrq~f\_1ro.g;~~fi;~J',Q()7; 0,9"1;';' ':'-'::::;¡;;;1 ,00"" 1;00:-": ' "\' ?';°O'Æ~ r~\; à)~ Frpb, pedibike! 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,99 1.00 1.00 ~lþb'~þêdl6IRðS7'}¡'i¡'Jt-;~:;f\t1RI\i11l!'1W'$:;.)¡:Y:;7\J:;bO':' 1.00:?";j"".'i~T.OO-' .1;00 ' ," ")1;O'O,",,!~';OO;{:.;.~ Fr1 1,00 0,99 1,00 0,98 1.00 0,97 1,00 0.92 Fm~î:'õfe¿fëd,,?,r;j?~~O:-\1~1ICj'O1r.fÞl>'\.711\1i'O19S 1:00:">;",.7;:;:rO.951.00 ,.,' '."-:-O:95'~Ef,~~J Satd.Flow(prot) , '1770 '.(826" '1770 A809 17821772 17551'853' F':'::>i!'IT'.':~e~' , ..: . O,9'S."71:0v".- .'r' ~O,;;5 . ,co .' 0,95" 1;OO';¡0:95"~qif:C50:'i~ s.~~, F:owioe=> '1770 -'~e25 " .;~() A~:;; '752 '1772 '1755 "i'ð53' -..,^ V~'ume ív~~)! .,;,.¡, ",.' "".2AS'I'" ~ A2 .......' C-3 ,- ~ û5:,,: ~ 2," ¡:, 2ii::i,+60/i'V,,"12,\;¡¡<t,lF'~<48¡t~~5a P'~.'-'~";'"c~ër:O!-£' \CO""';:O:¡".':::' 'i,::: '.:: ;,oo""ca"'Ùo"'j:oo Tor '1:00 1.00 '~:r;-~~i;"'(;;~~L7.-~::~""2¡¡5:::r:~21-:: :'("3'::7" ~ 950""~: f2-:~, 2127;';",,60;\}7.12J):gt7Jit~~1~r¡5 ~8"ê"G'~"c~;;W('~~)" 2(5' :233"': 5 'C~2 .. C "2~2""'72"- 0'" "77' 106 '0 ~~~~~~:~~;:~~:~:~~~!::~,~~~~~-~~~.:: ";:: ~--:: ~::~~::=j~~\~~~~~:~:~:~:C P'~~ec"~ ,,~~~'" 7. 3 6 5 2 1 6 "~~èn'5h!'cs'"«"--::",;~;:;.-':;,,,,>¡,:;;':::':,,~::,' "'.":'.'-:,:::?:.:~:;:'\;~*))';ìR&i!j~~!D;i~tf!¡,~~~ :'O~~"'.~ G'ee~. G (') 23.7 e3,S 2,: AA 9 '~.4 8,3 19,1 9.0 ~~~;;~~ ';;~~::~:(S\ ~3~r:;~~F~-~: ~~20; ~'- ~r ,"',:-:':!~: -;~.:~!;fì~~~!~ð~fR~ ~:ë~~;,~:;:!:~!~~;:~¡:,:,;¡~:~,:-,_'~~7':~;,~ .':" ;:~ "':~""-)':'7~:gn¡~I1~:gr~~~~roS~~~:g~J:&~ le.,'G,~ ~~(v-;.~)::,:;;;;,392'.;-2ii'1 ':.';'>.', ,,'3~ ,~aB:; "'.,nc,,;,,2~3ifJÌì>~\12'lt~J:!iÄ~ìi;?':t!J'¡;289~128~1fi v'.qa~'o:>'o: ,. cO,14 'o:2è' ..... OCJ 00,22 .., ¿C,:2 0.0";" "0.1o-èO:oá - v!s:Rii;:o .r:'!"':1~' c, ~,:,;,;..~,;,;::~,",;a~::::~7::":" : .<, '~"-:-:<;-::;:z;::..,:::, ~Q7i."~:;;)&Bt;m~~ vie <¡arc 0,63 0,.5 0:9 0,57 C 75 0.57 0,61 0.83 (]~"ð?f:i.CèIQY¡(!V;:TT.(2.!3,t-i!;1}1:'~.,:. ;,~, '-'::!ß::! -"2a.(r:'~ .,~:"Aa:a¡;:ø;~r2mtt4wÍ1~~~j,trJm!S¡!~1,*~" "'<y;'e!!i~"~"e:o' 0,84 O,eA ~,:' O~~ . ,CO 1,00 0,97 0.91 'Ft;¡;¡'i"'~~~-ãrCe'"ÿ7d2 :'.:'~-;3:ð~:S!~;';'::'; ,'~, ~ . "'.: ,2 :::"::-.r: 9.1t1;.ô:,i'.:¡;4;~'!1ft~;"::Ç~32~ :)~'ay (!) 39,3 9,5 ~. 2 2(\' 55,' 55,5 A6,3 80.1 !:'ev~"'-C'. Së>Vi~~:;"~~'.~:::;':';:Om~?~'"';":'y'-: E" '-'C.--;' ':~"--!õ"dfIT~"E¿~~i~'!)'f'.~D':~~t~fM Mz~ac~ !)e'"Y (!) '.,' 2e,3 55,7 ~~:9 !\:)þ~'C!i:[OS if;:..7'::r:3:i~ë;;;~8,;;:::,:, ,,~!'~,.> '~'.:':::C,:-:.;-:;:;,;'f.". ::.;';,1¡¡Jjj¡(j:;Ei¡r¡;~D'æJòJ~ Q!8@ðC;IIOl)t::'WMI!I¡;Yi11'1n:4!!;!!lrnm~:!¡¡;.~!!j!\\~~~~~m~,¡t - "'.J !;1Ptð!6Y:~.t~~~~!t§!i.R.e!i!y_--~Z¡Q\!:ì'f~'fJ$:!;1C M(l:(eYèl¡pf1.s.~t'?I~~ìih'1f&'I§.jt,,; ij.Q\t~ HCM Volume 10 Capacity rallo 0.68 ~ ~t u. ~ .t ~ ~J'6:th¡ 'ID JIB, ~ ~ r.. 6jp ,M!tã'ft1R ~ 9 íf1:iè 1; I ?4 1;\1 ~ . ~ ; m ~ ' 1 j f ) ( : ? ? .¡:; ; ! t !ntsr!ectJon Capacity Utillzallon 65.4% ICU level of Service ë¡!i¡;ç~:t1ëãr'E'âffèT:ß'@J~ A;'.\1f~l~iti¥.:~Wì\f.?~;~¡\¡;¡¡!jh',;¡ ;új!~:r~'fY\~'¡"~¥*I\;:~:-:',' '", - ': ,'~ '/!f'tJ?;i!â¡~.~, :---.1 ; ..... - -'., .,' .... .. M;\02102282\Comp Plan ammendmantlSynchrolMITIGATED- 2020 without Weyer E~ 2/2412004 Page 2 THETRAl VL3-FFS1 ... fi t I ~ ~ kt " ,. . & ~ ft a , It & , . , , ~ , ~ , . \ .. EXHIBI"T ~ ,,~.___- .. ' PAGE__- If I ..111 Attachment B: Travel Time Summary Sheets IEXHIBBT~ ;PAGE3.l-0F -U- , " ..~, . ':',' . . " .., -. 711 'WI 'W 7 'if' 'iJ""" "i\' ?J 'ill 'fJ 'it ",--",~"ë)-'-a '8~." 81èJ ¡) ¡-¡¡- a-- ~ - Travel Time Summary (without MItigation) Roadway Int. Delay (s) Total Travel TIme Distance Running TIme Speed PM HB w/o LInk Weyemaueser WI: 500' south to 320th . I 35 I 0.095 9.7 52.7 62.4 320th: Weyerhaueser Wy to 32nd. mph 0.150 15.4 30.4 45.8 32nd: 320th to 1,500 South of312th 0.25 25.7 0 25.7 [Totals 0.495 50.9 83.1 I 134.0 I PM SB w/o Link I 35 I 32nd: 1,500 South of 312th to 320th. mph 0.250 25.7 63.7 89.4 320th:32ndtoWeyerhauserWy 0.150 15.4 18.0 33.4 Weyemaueser Wy: 320th to 500' south 0.095 9.7 0 9.7 . IT~als_- 0.495 50.9 81.7 I 132.6 I I PM HB W7rh L.lnk 35 I WeyemaueserWy: 500' south to 320th mph 0.095 9.7 53.2 62.9 320th: Weyerhaueser Wy to 32M 0.150 15.4 20.5 35.9 32M: 320th to 1,500 South of 312th 0.25 25.7 0 25.7 ITotals 0.495 50.9 73.7 I 124.6 I I PM SB W7rh L.lnk 35 32nd: 1,500 South of 312th to 320th mph 0.250 25.7 4.5 30.2 320th: 32M to Weyerhauser Wy 0.150 15.4 47.6 63.0 Weyemaueser Wy: 320th to 500' south 0.095 9.7 0 9.7 ITotals 0.495 50.9 52.1 ¡ 103.0 500' south ... I 500' south I Î - ~... L ... 500' I I south -um »X G)I mõJ ...- ,..; 500' south 1 WIthout Link .fc " WIth LInk 4: r ... .' rrrJV"'.r-.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'3 t-t-1- t- t t t t t t , t I-I 'I t t t-t-'" , Travel Time Summary (with Mitigation) Speed Distance Running Time Int. Delay (s) Total Travel Time Roadway ri¡¡\:j¡j:j:::¡:::;1!;\:¡'::;::j!\:;\:j,\:\:::::\:m:::!¡':::~::M\ÌjÇireJ?¡':::::::::'!::::::':::":':::¡":¡::¡:: PM NB wlo LInk . Weyerhaueser Wy: 500' south to 320th . l 35 I 0.095 9.7 52.7 62.4 320th: Weyerhaueser Wy to 32nd - mph 0.150 15.4 28.1 43.5 32nd: 320th to 1,500 South of 312th - 0.25 25.7 0 25.7 ¡Totals . 0.495 50.9 80.8 I 131.7 I PM SB wlo Link I 35 I 32nd: 1,500 South of 312th to 320th - mph 0.250 25.7 46.3 72.0 320th: 32nd to Weyerhauser Wy . 0.150 15.4 20.0 35.4 Weyerhaueser Wy: 320th to 500' south - 0.095 9.7 . 0 9.7 IT otals 0.495 50.9 66.3 I 117.2 I .. ,-0 m »X G)I m- \~ ~~~ ~ í . ..... , I ~*\ .t- \ \ ¡ I .1 City of Federal Way PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting ~~, '." ¡ ¡' ~<+ ,~,: ,,', :"; April 21, 2004 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers MELTlNCj MINUTES Commissioners present: John Cau1fìeld. Hope Elder, Dave Osaki, Dini Duclos. Bi1l Drake, and Grant Ncwport. Commissioners abscnt: Marta Justus Fokh (excuscd). Alternate Commissioners present: Lawson Bronson. Tony Moore, and Merle Pfeifer. Alternate Commlssloncrs absent: Christine Nelson (unexcused). City CouncIl present: Deputy Mayor LlI1da Kochmar and Counc¡] Membcr Jeanne Burbidge. Staff present: Community Dcvelopment Services Dlrcctor Kathy McClung, Community Development Services Deputy DIrector Greg Fewins, Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Associate Planner Isaac Conlen, Assistant City Attorney Karen Jorgensen, Traffic Engll1eer Rick Perez, Contract Planner Janet Shull, Jones & Stokes Gregg Dohm, Jones & Stokes Lisa Grueter, and Administrative Assistant E. Tina Piety. Chair Caulfield ca1led the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ApPROVAL OF MINUTES It was Iilhlc to adopt the Apnl 7.2004, mill utes as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENT Nonc. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT None COMMISSION BlJSINESS PUBLIC HEARII\'G - Potential Anncxation Area (1';\;\) Subarea Plan Mr. Conlen delivered a presentation on questions r~uscd at the last public hearing. It was stated that a dcvclopmcnt agrecmcnt is an optIon for the Rablc propcrty. PUBLIC HEARING - New Freeway Commercial Zoning Classification Ms. Shull delivered a presentation on questIons reused at the last public hcaring. Bccause the Commission wanted to know what parccls this proposcd 10nll1g could be applied to, shc showed a map of the current zonll1g In the areas consIdered for this proposcd zonl11g classIfIcatIon. Ms. Shull commented that if this zonIng classification IS approved. any owner wishing to apply this proposed zonc to theIr property would have to go through the City's Comprehenslvc I'lan Amendment process. PUBLIC HEARING ~ 2003 Comprehensive 1'14111 Amcndmcnts ~ Quadrant Site-Specific Request Ms. Clark delivered the staff report. CommiSSIoner Newport recused himself {i'om the Quadrant site- specifìc request. ThIS is a rcqucst to delete a proposcd road from the Federal Way COIIJprehensive Plan (FWC'P). Thc road in question IS an extcnsion of WcyerhacLlscr Way. The City Council required the K \1'k""""g("""un""",,\2(XJ4\McCl"'gS"""m'y(.'21.(~,h EXH\B\T PAGE. 2- ,-- I Planning Comnússion Minutes Page 2 April 21, 2004 applicant to prepare a traffic study analyzing the effects of deleting this street from the comprehensive plan. The study concluded that no roadway improvements would be needed by 2020 as a result of the proposed action. Due to this proposal, Mr. Perez asked the Commission to consider amending the comprehensive plan to make 32od A venue South a principal collector from South 320111 Street to approximately South 316tl1 Street. The meeting was opened to public testimony. Commissioner Duclos infonned the Commission that she had spoken to Steve McNey and encouraged him to bring his comments to this public hearing. Wally Costello - Applicant for the Quadrant request. He explained their proposal for the parcels the road would pass through and showed how the road would be detrimental to the proposed project. There are wetlands on the property that will restrict development and a road would restrict it further. ! Joanne Kirkland - She spoke in opposition of the Jackson request. She stated that the map in the staff report shows 312lh as a through street (from 3200 to Military), but it is not. The report also says that a grocery store would decrease the amount of traffic in the area, but how could adding retail decrease the amount of traffic? She also commented that she recently learned that the P AA process has been going on for some two years, but this is the first she has heard about it. She is concerned that annexation would raise taxes and services would go down. This is a safe area for children and she is concerned that will change. Chainnan Caulfield asked if King County mailed a notification of the P AA Subarea Plan to those within the PAA? Ms. Grueter replied that the issue was on the King County website, but for the most part, the City of Federal Way mailed the notifications. A notification had been sent in the utility mailings. Charles Gibson -- He spoke his support of the Northlake request and said he was available if the Commission had any questions. Cindy Cope. - She spoke in opposition of the Jackson request. She feels there is no need to bring more retail into the area. There is a lot of available retail space in Federal Way, such as the vacant theater and empty spaces in the Mall and Ross Plaza and SeaTac Village, etc. This area is a very private neighborhood that is safe for children to ride their bikes. Opening 32od would bring more traffic, which would make it more dangerous for children to ride their bikes and would bring in more crime. Steve McNey - He is the Jackson property manager. They want Community Business (Be) zoning because they feel they can best serve the neighborhood and the City with that zoning. They are not trying to compete with the downtown core. A grocery store in this area would decrease traffic on 3201", would proved a tax base to the City, and would provide a service to the neighborhood. They have submitted a docket to King County asking for a zoning change to commercial business. Kristen Wynne - She spoke in opposition of the Jackson request. She feels the proposed Freeway Commercial zone is not compatible with existing uses. If a car dealership were to go into the area, it would mean more lights and noise. She commented that 320tl1 is already a disaster area on the weekends. A more intense traffic study should be done before a decision is made. In addition, in tenns of aesthetics, a car dealership at the entrance to Federal Way is a step in the wrong direction. K:IPlanning Cocm1ission\2004\M""ing Surmwy Q4-21-04.doc EXH'B\T PAGE 2 2. .J Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 April 21, 2004 Public testimony was closed. It was m/slc (unanimous) to recommend adoption of the Neighborhood Business comprehensive plan designation and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning for the Davis P AA site-specific request. It was ill/sic (unanimous) to recommend adoption of the Single Family, High Density comprehensive plan designation and Single Family 9.6 zoning for the Northlake PAA site-specific request. The Commission discussed how the owner of the Rabie P AA sit-specific request could utilize a development agreement. Mr. Fewins informed the Commission that annexation of this area is not anticipated in the near future and the owner plans to develop soon. It was m/slf(one yes, four no, one abstain) to recommend adoption of the Neighborhood Business comprehensive plan designation and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning for the Rabie P AA site-specific request. The Commission expressed concern over downzoning the property. It was m/slf(three yes, three no) to recommend adoption of the Single Family, High Density comprehensive plan designation and Single Family 7.2 zoning for the Rabie P AA site-specific request; with the stipulation that the Planning Commission feels strongly that a self- storage/mini-storage use would be an acceptable use on this site. After further discussion, it was concluded that the Rabie P AA site-specific request would go forward with no Planning Commission recommendation. It was m/slf(one yes, five no) to recommend adoption of the Community Business comprehensive plan designation and Community Business (Be) zoning for the Jackson P AA site-specific request. It was m/s/c (four yes, two no) to recommend adoption of the Office Park comprehensive plan designation and Office Park (OP) zoning to the south part of the Jackson P AA site-specific request, and Single Family High Density comprehensive plan designation and Single Family RS 9.6 zoning to the north part of the Jackson P AA site-specific request. It was m/s/c (five yes, one no) to recommend adoption of the staffrecommendation for the New Freeway Commercial Zoning Classification. It was l1l/s/c (unanimous) to recommend adoption, with the aforementioned changes, of the staff recommendation for the P AA Subarea Plan. It was m/s/c (four yes, one no, one excused) to recommended adoption of the staffrecommendation for the Quadrant site-specific request with the amendment that 32nd Avenue South, from South 320th Street to approximately South 3161h Street, would be reclassified from a minor to a principal collector, it would use Cross Section "0," Map III- 6 would be modified to reflect this, and 32nd Avenue South from South 320lh Street to approximately South 3161h Street would replace Weyerhaeuser Way as Map ID #35 on Table III-I 9. The Public Hearings were closed at 8:55. These items will be scheduled for the May 3,2004, City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee, which will meet at 5:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADJOURN . The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. EXHIBIT PAGE-1 2- ).=3 K:IPlanning Comnissionl2004IM«ting Summary 04-2 I-O4.doc