2022 08-17 Planning Commission Agenda PacketCommissioners City Staff
Lawson Bronson, Chair Wayne Carlson, Vice-Chair Keith Niven, Planning Manager
Tim O’Neil Hope Elder Kari Cimmer, Admin & Permit Center Supervisor
Diana Noble-Gulliford Tom Medhurst 253-835-2629
Jae So Anna Patrick, Alternate www.cityoffederalway.com
Vickie Chynoweth, Alternate Vacant, Alternate
K:\01 - Document Review\Planning\Planning Commission Documents\2022 08 August 17\To Be Purged\2022 08-17 Planning Commission Agenda.docx
City of Federal Way
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 17, 2022 City Hall
6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Planning Commission Meeting of July 20, 2022
4. PUBLIC COMMENT (NON-HEARING COMMENTS)
5. COMMISSION BUSINESS
a. Public Hearing: 2022 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments
i. Staff Presentation
ii. Commission Questions
iii. Public Comment
iv. Commission Deliberation
6. STAFF BUSINESS
a. Manager’s Report
7. NEXT MEETING
a. September 7, 2022 – Regular Meeting
8. ADJOURNMENT
Planning Commission meetings are held in-person.
To request accommodation to attend or to provide public comment virtually, please contact Kari Cimmer at 253-835-2629 or
karic@cityoffederalway.com, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 16, 2022.
Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 July 20, 2022
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 20, 2022
6:00 p.m. City Hall
MEETING MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Bronson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioners present: Lawson Bronson, Hope Elder, Tim O’Neil, Tom Medhurst, Jae So, Anna Patrick,
and Vickie Chynoweth. Diana Noble-Gulliford participated via Zoom audio.
Chair Bronson excused Commissioner Carlson.
City Staff present: Planning Manager Keith Niven, City Attorney Kent van Alstyne, and Admin & Permit
Center Supervisor Kari Cimmer.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner So moved to approve the July 6, 2022 minutes as submitted. Commissioner Elder seconded.
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
None
5. COMMISSION BUSINESS
Planning Manager Niven introduced and reviewed a memorandum addressing questions posed by
Commissioners at the July 6, 2022 Meeting.
Planning Manager Niven began a review of the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Chapter, Policy Section,
presentation.
Mr. Niven noted that of the 105 Shoreline Policies to be covered tonight a great majority will simply be a
“should” to “shall” verbiage change. As was requested by Commissioner So, he will spend tonight’s review
time on the more substantive changes.
Commissioner O’Neil had questions regarding cell towers. City Attorney van Alstyne noted stated the cell
towers regulations are in our zoning code.
6. MANAGER REPORT
A stakeholder virtual meeting for the South Station area will be held on Thursday, July 21 and the Planning
Commissioners are invited to attend.
Page 2 of 74
Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 July 20, 2022
The Ad Hoc committee members are attending a meeting on August 2 at 5:30 p.m., to do a SWAT analysis
of the downtown. All Commissioners are invited to come as citizens.
A reminder that the Bally’s hearing will be on August 9, 2022 City Council meeting.
The 2022 Comp Plan Amendments for the Rivera property and the Traffic division will be presented at the
August 17, 2022 Planning Commission meeting.
7. NEXT MEETING
Planning Manager Niven announced the next meeting of the Planning Commission will be held at 6:00 p.m.
on August 17, 2022, which will be a public hearing.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Medhurst moved that the meeting be adjourned; Second by Commissioner O’Neil.
The meeting adjourned at 7:18 p.m.
Attest: Approved by Commission:
_______________________________________ __________________
Kari Cimmer, Admin & Permit Center Supervisor Date
Page 3 of 74
STAFF REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
June 7, 2022
TO: Federal Way Planning Commission
FROM: Brian Davis, Community Development Director
Keith Niven, AICP, CEcD, Planning Manager
Natalie Kamieniecki, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Rivera Property Site Specific Request
Public Works Text Amendments
MEETING DATE: August 17, 2022
I. BACKGROUND
Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130 (5)(a), the City of Federal Way must update its comprehensive plan
every ten years. The deadline for the next major update is December 31, 2024. However, per
Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.80.050, the city has elected to review citizen-initiated
requests on an annual basis. As part of the annual review, the city may also make changes to
chapters and maps of the comprehensive plan.
Federal Way adopted its comprehensive plan in 1995 and updated it in December 1998,
December 2000, November 2001, March 2003, July 2004, June 2005, July 2007, June 2009,
October 2010, January 2011, January 2013, June 2015, January 2018, April 2019 and January
2021. The Growth Management Act (GMA, RCW 36.70A.130 [2] [a]) limits plan updates to no
more than once per year, except under the following circumstances:
1. The initial adoption of a subarea plan that clarifies, supplements, or implements
jurisdiction-wide comprehensive plan policies;
2. The development of an initial subarea plan for economic development located
outside of the one hundred year floodplain in a county that has completed a state-
funded pilot project that is based on watershed characterization and local habitat
assessment;
3. The adoption or amendment of a shoreline master program;
4. The amendment of the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan that
occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a county or city budget; or
Page 4 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 2
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
5. The adoption of comprehensive plan amendments necessary to enact a planned
action.
Except as otherwise provided above, the governing body shall consider all proposals concurrently,
so the cumulative effect of the various proposals can be ascertained. However, after appropriate
public participation, a county or city may adopt amendments or revisions to its comprehensive plan
that conform to this chapter whenever an emergency exists, or to resolve an appeal of a
comprehensive plan filed with a growth management hearings board or with the court.
II. REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
FWRC Chapter 19.80, “Council Rezones,” establishes a process and criteria for comprehensive
plan amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission is as
follows:
1. To review and evaluate the requests for comprehensive plan amendments;
2. To determine whether the proposed comprehensive plan amendments meet the
criteria provided by FWRC.80.140, 19.80.150, and 19.75.130(3); and
3. To forward a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the
proposed comprehensive plan amendments.
III. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
Selection Process (Prioritizing Docketed Proposals)
February 7, 2022 Land Use Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting
February 15, 2022 City Council Public Hearing
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process
April 15, 2022 Issuance of Determination of Nonsignificance pursuant to the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
April 29, 2022 End of SEPA Comment Period
May 20, 2022 End of SEPA Appeal Period
May 27, 2022 Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing (exhibit W)
June 15, 2022 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission
July 6, 2022 Public Hearing continuance (if needed)
September 9, 2022 LUTC Meeting
October 4, 2022 City Council 1st Reading
Page 5 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 3
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
October 18, 2022 City Council 2nd Reading
IV. 2022 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
This annual update includes one citizen-initiated request for amendments to comprehensive plan
designations and zoning; and, Public Works Text Amendments for Non-motorized transportation
improvements throughout the city and around the transit center. The Rivera site-specific request
is described in Section V of this staff report, the Public Works Text Amendments are described in
Section VI.
V. CITIZEN-INITIATED SITE-SPECIFIC REQUEST
1. Site-Specific Request – Richard Rivera Property
Request for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of parcel no. 052104-9204, 1.26-
acre site, located at 1600 South 304th Street, from Professional Office (PO) to Community
Business (BC) (exhibits I and J).
Reason for the Request
The applicant previously obtained project approval for an office building under permit #07-
105965-UP (expired, July 18, 2016). The applicant asserts that current and past high
vacancy rates for office buildings in the city has inhibited financial institutions from
approving construction loans for new professional office buildings in Federal Way. The
Community Business (BC) zone affords flexibility in retail, office and residential uses. The
immediate area is developed with a variety of land uses including Federal Way High
School, mixed retail uses, religious assembly, vehicles service station and residential units
including attached dwelling units and single-family dwelling units. In addition, there are
other BC-zoned properties adjacent and in the nearby area including to the south, east and
southeast of the subject property.
Summary
Applicant: Richard Rivera
Property Owner: Richard Rivera
Existing Comprehensive Plan
Designation:
Professional Office (PO)
Existing Zoning Designation: Professional Office (PO)
Requested Comprehensive Plan
Designation:
Community Business (BC)
Parcel No.
Address Size in
Acres
Existing Land
Use
052104-9204 1600 S
304th St
1.26 acres Vacant property
Page 6 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 4
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
Requested Zoning Designation: Community Business (BC)
Surrounding Zoning & Land Use
Zoning Land Use
North Single-Family (RS9.6, minimum lot size 9,600
square feet) Single Family Residence
South Community Business (BC) Federal Way High School, Union 76
Car wash station
East Multi-Family (RM 2400) Attached dwelling units
West Professional Office (PO), Community
Business (BC) Office use
Availability of Utilities
Sanitary
Sewer:
Lakehaven Water and Sewer provides sewer service in this area. Sewer
service is available adjacent to the property along both S 304th Street and
16th Avenue S. Future site development would require onsite sewer
extension &/or sewer service connections from Lakehaven Water and Sewer
District (exhibit K).
Public Water: Lakehaven Water and Sewer District provides water service in this area.
Existing water service is available adjacent to the property along both S
304th Street and 16th Avenue S. Future site development would require
onsite water main extension &/or water service connections from Lakehaven
Water and Sewer District (exhibit K).
Solid Waste: Solid waste is provided by Waste Management.
Availability of Public Services
Police: Police protection is provided by and will continue to be
provided by the City of Federal Way Police Department
should development occur. A component of the Community
Design Guidelines applications for development would be
required to submit the Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design. Checklist. The provisions within the
code section promote concepts to reduce attraction of crime.
Fire/Emergency/Medical: These services are provided by South King Fire and Rescue.
The South King Fire has indicated that they have no comment
regarding the proposed comprehensive plan and rezone of the
site from PO to BC.
Page 7 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 5
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
Schools: This area falls within the boundaries of Federal Way School
District. School impact fees for residential uses are collected
at the time of building permit.
Critical Areas
There are no mapped or known critical areas. No geologically hazardous landslide or erosion
hazard. No wetlands or fish and wildlife habitat is located on or within 225 feet of the subject
property. The site is not located within a regulated aquifer recharge or wellhead protection
area. The site is not located within a flood hazard area or shoreline jurisdiction.
Drainage
Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the 2021 King
County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City of Federal Way Addendum
to the manual. Future development must meet the requirements for a Full Drainage Review.
At the time of land use site plan submittal, a preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR),
addressing the relevance of the project to the nine core and five special requirements of the
KCSWDM will be required.
The project site lies within a Conservation flow control area; thus, the applicant must design
the flow control facility to meet this performance criteria. In addition to flow control
facilities, Best Management Practices (BMP’s) are required as outlined in the KCSWDM.
The project also lies within Enhanced Basic Water Quality Area. Water Quality Treatment
shall be designed to meet the treatment criteria of the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Menu.
Access
This parcel has street frontage on 304th Street and 16th Avenue South. Final access and
driveway location will be reviewed through future site-specific development applications.
Potential Traffic Impacts
This is a non-project action associated with changing the comprehensive plan designation and
zoning from Professional Office (PO) to Community Business (BC). This non-project action
and potential impacts to traffic are evaluated at a high level. However, should this request be
approved, at the time that an application for a development permit is submitted, the Traffic
Division will conduct a Transportation Concurrency Analysis, which will analyze peak hour
impacts of the project to assure that there is adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed
development. Supplemental mitigation may be required if the proposed project creates an
impact not anticipated in the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). Development proposals
will also be subject to a traffic impact fee to address system impacts. Site-specific analysis
may also be required to address impacts outside of the evening peak hour or safety issues.
VI. Public Works Comprehensive Plan Amendments
The following Comprehensive plan amendments are requested by the Public Work Department
for non-motorized transportation improvements:
A. City Center:
Page 8 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 6
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
Extend BPA Trail from 11th PL/13th Ave S along north side of S. 324th St to 23rd Ave S and
along west side of 23rd Ave S from S. 324th to S. 320th Street (exhibit A & B). This project
element is included under City’s CIP, Project #16 (exhibit M). The proposed amendment
results in an 18 foot-wide multi use / shared-used path and regional trail connection to the BPA
Trail (exhibit C) and consistent with the Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed
Solution Community Outreach Summary (exhibit L).
B. Federal Way Transit Center Pedestrian Connection:
Construct sidewalk to preserve pedestrian access between large blocks with in City
Center, specifically from Pete von Reichbaurer Way S and 21st Ave S (exhibit D). This
project is included under City’s CIP, Project # 29 (exhibit N). The proposed
amendment will improve and preserve non-motorized transportation safety for those
accessing the Federal Way Transit Center.
C. North Fork West Hylebos Trail:
Construct Trail within Spring Valley along North Fork of West Hylebos Creek (exhibit
E). Typical cross section in nonenvironmentally sensitive areas (Asphalt Concrete) and
boardwalk within environmentally sensitive areas (exhibit F & G), respectively. This
project is included under City’s CIP, Project # 42 (exhibit O). The proposed amendment
will increase opportunities to connect the community with the natural environment as
well as connect to Todd Beamer High School. The project would be a joint venture
between Public Works Surface Water Management (SWM) and the Parks Department.
D. Non-Motorized Facilities Around South Federal Way Transit Station (exhibit H):
Project Description
1 S. 359th: SR 99 to SR 161: Construct sidewalk and bike lanes on both sides of
the street
2 16th Avenue S: S. 359th to S. 364th Way: Construct sidewalk and bike lanes on
both sides of the street
3 S. 359th and SR 161: Construct staircase and ADA accessible ramp
4 I-5 Crossing: S. 359th to 20th Avenue S: Construct non-motorized crossing
5 20th Avenue S and S. 360th: SR 161 to 32nd Avenue S: Construct sidewalk and
bike lanes on both sides of the street
6 Milton Road S: SR 161 to S 369th St: Construct sidewalk and bike lanes on both
sides of the street
VII. Public Comments Received
The following is a summary of the comments received during the notice of application and
SEPA Environmental Determination. Comment letters are included as an attachment to this
staff report.
Rivera Property
• Lives directly across from the proposed rezone. Concerns over increased traffic and
crime. Development will displace families that have lived in the area for more than
40 years (exhibit P).
Page 9 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 7
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
• Bought home with understanding that property was zoned PO for office use. BC
could allow multi-family housing. Concerns with traffic and crime (exhibit Q).
• Strongly oppose, could allow multi-family. Part of the “American Dream” is owning
a house not living in an apartment (exhibit R).
• Development of the property will result in traffic congestion and increased crime.
The proposal will displace families and decrease property values (exhibit S).
• Concerns about impact to the neighborhood and if an impact study has been
conducted (exhibit T).
• Adjacent office property currently experiences illegal activity. Proposal will increase
crime and vehicle break-ins. Impacts associated with overflow parking from activities
related to Federal Way High School (exhibit U).
• Concerns over change in zoning that would allow multi-family housing. Proposal
will have a negative effect to Federal Way High School and neighboring homes.
Significantly increase traffic and crime (exhibit V).
Public Works
• No comments were received on the proposed text amendments for non-motorized
transportation improvements.
VIII. COMPLIANCE WITH FWRC 19.80.140 - FWRC 19.80.140, Factors to be Considered in
a Comprehensive Plan Amendment – The city may consider, but is not limited to, the following
factors when considering a proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan.
(1) The effect upon the physical environment.
Rivera Property
There are no foreseeable or anticipated significant adverse impacts on the physical
environment related to development of this property. Regardless of zoning, the city has
adopted codes and regulations in place to protect the environment. There are no mapped
or known critical areas on site. No mapped or known geologically hazardous landslide or
erosion hazard onsite. No wetlands or fish and wildlife habitat is located on or within 225
feet of the subject property. The site is not located within a regulated aquifer recharge or
wellhead protection area. The site is not located within a flood hazard area or shoreline
jurisdiction.
Public Works
There will be no adverse or unmitigated impact on the physical environment related to
development of the proposed Public Works non-motorized transportation improvements.
The city has adopted environmental codes in place to protect the environment. Project
specific environmental review will occur with each requested project. Planning non-
motorized transportation options with an emphasis on including non-motorized routes,
greater mobility options, alternatives to driving, and lowering transportation-related
energy consumption is consistent with the city’s transportation state and regional policies
(FWCP Chapter 3.1) and a benefit to the physical environment.
Page 10 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 8
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
(2) The effect on open space, streams, and lakes.
Rivera Property
The project is currently undeveloped land. There are no mapped lakes or streams on or
within close proximity to the site. Development of the site as currently zoned or as
proposed will not impact open space, streams or lakes.
Public Works
A. City Center – Proposal to extend BPA Trail will not affect open space, streams or
lakes.
B. Federal Way Transit Center Pedestrian Connection – Proposed pedestrian
connection is located within currently developed city blocks north of S 320th St
between Pete von Reichbauer Way S and 21st Ave S. This connection will not affect
open space, streams or lakes.
C. North Fork West Hylebos Trail – The proposed boardwalk will require project
specific environmental review and critical areas assessment. The boardwalk does
diminish open space, lakes or streams. The project will enhance environmental
education opportunities.
D. Non-Motorized Facilities Around South Federal Way Transit Station non-
motorized capital projects – Individual projects will require site specific
environmental review as needed. The projects will not impact open space, lakes or
streams.
(3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods.
Rivera Property
The FWRC provides development regulations to offset impacts to adjacent property
through setbacks, height limitations, landscaping, tree retention, building, site design
criteria; etc., for all developments.
Specifically, concerns regarding height of potential multi-family structures has been
received through public comment. For a site-specific comprehensive plan amendment, a
declared use and development plan is not required. However, current regulations contain
provisions to offset height impacts on adjacent residential or single-family residential
zoned property. for example, multifamily structures within the BC zone are limited to a
building height that may not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation for the
portion of the building located within 100 ft. from a single-family residential zone. The
height limitation of 30 feet within 100 feet of a residential zone or single-family
residential zone is echoed throughout the uses permitted in the BC zone.
Public Works
The Public Works text amendments for non-motorized transportation improvements are
primarily comprised of completing or constructing sidewalks, improving bicycle
transportation, pedestrian connectivity to the Federal Way Transit Center and other
similar improvements at locations throughout the city. The proposal also includes
improving access to the natural environment via the West fork Hylebos Trail and
Boardwalk. These uses are compatible with the surrounding land uses and
neighborhoods.
Page 11 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 9
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
(4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public
transportation, parks, recreation, and schools.
Rivera Property
All public utilities are available to the subject property. School impact fees are collected
during the building permit phase if future development includes residential uses. The
project site is within ¼ mile of bus transit service. Traffic mitigation will be implemented
during project specific review.
There are a wide variety of recreational opportunities in the city. These opportunities
include Dash Point State Park (a 398-acre state park on the west side of the city, operated
and maintained by Washington State Parks); Celebration Park (an 84-acre city-owned
community park located approximately in the middle of the city with ballfields and
walking trails); Town Square Park (a four-acre city-owned community park located in the
City Center); and recreation trails in the Bonneville Power Administration right-of-way.
There are also a number of other parks and open space areas scattered throughout the city.
The Rivera Property is privately owned property and is not a public park, protected open
space or green belt.
City codes require provision of on-site open space, or a fee-in-lieu of open space, if land
is developed for residential uses.This is a non-project action and there is no site-specific
proposal; however, if the parcel is developed with residential uses in the future, impacts
on schools would be mitigated by the payment of a school impact fees.
The listed elements community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,
parks, recreation, and schools are adequate to accommodate the proposal.
Public Works
The proposed amendments serve to provide viable and safe alternative access for
pedestrian and other non-motorized options to travel to community facilities, travel along
roadways and arrive at public transportation facilities. The west Fork Hylebos Trail will
enhance parks and recreations opportunities and connect to Todd Beamer High School.
The listed elements community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,
parks, recreation, and schools are adequate to accommodate the proposal.
(5) The benefit to the neighborhood, city, and region.
Rivera Property
The existing neighborhood pattern includes commercial, office, civic, single-family and
multi-family uses. At present, vacancy rates of existing office buildings continue to climb
making office developments less likely to be constructed or viable for the foreseeable
future. Unsecured vacant properties that do not have established uses or the appearance of
ownership are subject to trespass and illegal dumping or encampments. The BC zone
allows for a mixture of uses more compatible with the surrounding development.
Public Works
The proposed amendments aim to maintain mobility through a safe, balanced, and
integrated transportation system, enhance community health and livability through a
connected system of non-motorized pedestrian, bicycle and transit ways that are part of a
regional transportation network aimed at reducing dependency on individual private
vehicle transportation.
Page 12 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 10
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
(6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and
the demand for such land.
Rivera Property
Professional Office or Office Park designation in not in demand and existing office
building vacancy has significantly increased in the post pandemic work scape trends.
Demand for land that is flexible and allows mixed use development with respect to
commercial retail and residential uses is in demand and need to reach employment and
housing goals.
Public Works
Not applicable for non-motorized transportation improvements identified in this report.
(7) The current and projected population density in the area.
Rivera Property
Population growth continues to steadily increase within the City of Federal Way (FWCP 2.3,
figure II-3). The proposal is a non-project action comprehensive plan amendment and does
not require a site-specific proposal. If residential development or mixed use commercial
residential is proposed at the site the number of units would depend on development
regulations for access and stormwater infrastructure, and zoning restrictions due to height,
parking, landscaping, and open space requirements. As identified in the Housing Action
Plan the area in general can accommodate such development. In addition, Federal Way
needs to add approximately 6,800 new units before 2040 to accommodate expected
population growth and account for past underproduction. This equates to an average
production of 339 units each year, a 68% increase over recent housing production trends
Public Works
Population within the city and region continues to grow. Diverse options for non-
motorized transportation available to residence of all mobility types and needs are
increasingly vital to the success of an emerging multi-modal progressive transit-oriented
city.
(8) The effect upon other aspects of the comprehensive plan.
Rivera Property
The Community Business designation encompasses two major retail/commercial areas
along the SR-99 corridor, including the segment generally between South 272nd Street
and South 312th Street, and the segment between South 324th Street and approximately
South 339th Street. Presently, these areas are characterized by a wide range of
development types and appearances, including older, single-story developments that
provide excellent redevelopment opportunities (FWCP 2.7). Approval of the requested
Community Business (BC) comprehensive plan designation at the subject property not
affect other aspects of the comprehensive plan.
Public Works
Approval of the requested text amendments will not affect other aspects of the
Community Plan.
IX. COMPLIANCE WITH FWRC 19.80.150 - Criteria for Amending the Comprehensive Plan
– The city may amend the comprehensive plan only if it finds that:
Page 13 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 11
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
(1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or
welfare;
Rivera Property
Changing the designations from Professional Office to Community Business does have a
substantial relationship to public health, or safety in that in the event the property is
developed with any of the allowed uses within the BC zone there is an increased chance
that the site will be occupied with relevant uses other than the dwindling office use type.
It is not likely that sorely office use would be financially viable or the highest and best
use of the site. With diverse use types permitted in the BC zone it is more likely the site
would be developed, occupied and be productive for the overall economic growth of the
city. Developed and occupied sites generally deter illegal trespass, encampments and
garbage dumping.
If in the future residential development were proposed at this location, the Housing
Action Plan has indicated that this area having the potential to the contribution of
additional residential units to meet expected population growth goals. Due to the small
size of the subject property there is an increased probability that small businesses would
be able to thrive at this location, potentially adding job opportunities.
Public Works
Please see response under Sections V (4) & V (5).
(2) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city.
Rivera Property and Public Works
As detailed throughout this report, the Rivera Property proposal and the Public Works
non-motorized transportation improvements text amendments are in the best interest of
the residents of the city.
(3) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW
and with the portion of the city’s adopted plan not affected by the amendments.
The comprehensive plan amendments under consideration are consistent with the
following goals of RCW Chapter 36.70A.020 of the Growth Management Act (GMA).
The following goals are not listed in order of priority and shall be used exclusively for the
purpose of guiding the development of comprehensive plans and development regulations:
i. Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public
facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
ii. Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are
based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive
plans.
iii. Housing. Plan for and accommodate housing affordable to all economic
segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities
and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock.
iv. Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the state
Page 14 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 12
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic
opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for
disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existing
businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional differences
impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas
experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's
natural resources, public services, and public facilities.
Rivera Property
The Rivera property proximate location to Pacific Highway S and disassociated with the
predominate locations of existing Office Park and Professional Office designations. The
proposed BC designation would be consistent with the existing BC corridor identified in
the Comprehensive Plana and is consistent with the following policies of the
comprehensive plan for the Community Business Comprehensive Plan Designation:
General Policies for Commercial, Office, and Commercial Enterprise The following
apply to all commercial, office, and commercial enterprise designations. In some
instances, specific goals and policies may follow a specific land use designation.
• LUP 26 Provide for a mix of commercial and residential uses in most commercial
areas
• LUP 27 Use design and performance standards to integrate multi-family development
into commercial developments as commercial/ residential mixed-use development.
Performance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility.
• LUP 29 Ensure compatibility between non-residential developments and residential
zones by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers
Community Business
• Goal LUG6 Transform Community Business areas into vital, attractive, areas with a
mix of uses that appeal to pedestrians, motorists, and residents, and enhance the
community’s image. Policies
• LUP 39 Encourage transformation of the Pacific Highway (SR-99) Community
Business corridors into quality retail/commercial mixed-use areas, designed to
integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation, and to improve traffic flow and
safety, including access control and off-street interconnectivity between adjoining
properties where feasible. Continue to utilize Community Design Guidelines to
ensure quality site and building design and functional and aesthetic compatibility
between uses. Integration of pedestrian amenities and open space into retail and
office development should also be encouraged.
• LUP 40 Encourage a range of pedestrian-oriented retail, while continuing to
accommodate auto-oriented retail uses, and provide supportive uses to meet the needs
of residents and employees in the area.
Public Works
Page 15 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 13
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
Public Work Department request Comprehensive Plan text amendments to include the
non-motorized transportation improvements consistent with the goals and policies of the
FWCP - Chapter Three, Transportation. An overarching goal of the city is safety,
accessibility, and a connected multi-modal non-motorized network.
• Goal 1 TG1 Maintain mobility through a safe, balanced, and integrated transportation
system.
• Policies TP1.1 Reduce reliance on drive alone trips by prioritizing and implementing
supportive local-level transit, high occupancy vehicle (HOV), and nonmotorized
improvements.
• TP1.10 Coordinate with transit agencies to provide convenient non-motorized access
to transit facilities.
• Goal 3 TG3 Enhance community health, livability, and transportation by providing a
connected system of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit ways that are integrated into a
coordinated regional network.
• TP3.8 Encourage non-motorized improvements that minimize the need for residents
to use motorized modes by extending the existing non-motorized system and
providing: 1. Access to activity centers and schools; 2. Linkage to transit, park & ride
lots, and school bus networks; 3. Completion of planned pedestrian/jogging or
bicycle trails; 4. Designating a network of streets that can safely and efficiently
accommodate bicycles; and, 5. Extend sidewalks to all streets.
• Goal 5 TG5 Develop and implement transportation systems management strategies
and programs that contribute to the overall effectiveness of the multimodal
transportation system.
• TP5.8 Encourage the provision of a robust transportation alternative rich environment
so that all members of the community, including those with transportation
disadvantages, have viable travel options or alternatives.
X. FWRC 19.75.130(3)(a), Recommendation by the Hearing Examiner. In this instance, through
the consolidated review process of FWRC 19.15.060, the Planning Commission applies the criteria
listed in FWRC 19.75.130(3)(a) instead of the Hearing Examiner. Because this application is
utilizing the consolidated review process of FWRC 19.15.060, the Planning Commission will
forward a recommendation to the City Council as provided under FWRC 19.80.240. After
considering all of the information and comments submitted on the matter, the Planning
Commission shall issue a written recommendation to the city council. The Planning Commission
shall use the following criteria for quasi-judicial rezones:
(3) Decisional criteria. The hearing examiner shall use the following criteria for quasi-judicial
rezones:
(a) The city may approve an application for a quasi-judicial nonproject rezone only if it finds that:
(i) The proposed rezone is in the best interest of the residents of the city; and
Page 16 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 14
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
Rivera Property
The change in designation and zone would allow for the property to be developed as any
of the listed uses in FWRC 19.220 – Community Business. The property does not contain
any mapped or known critical areas and is served by urban infrastructure and services
that can support the proposed designation and uses.
Public Works
Not applicable.
(ii) The proposed rezone is appropriate because either:
(A) Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly
changed since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed
conditions, a rezone is within the public interest; or
(B) The rezone will correct a zone classification or zone boundary that was inappropriate
when established;
Rivera Property
Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have significantly changed
since the property was given its present zoning and since the City of Federal Way
incorporated has remained undeveloped. At present, vacancy rates of existing office
buildings in the city are approximately 26-30%, making office developments less likely
to be constructed or viable. This is the case with the Rivera Property. The applicant
previously obtained project approval for an office building under permit #07-105965-UP
(expired, July 18, 2016). The applicant asserts that current and past high vacancy rates
for office buildings inhibited the project to obtain funding. Unsecured vacant
properties that do not have established uses or the appearance of ownership are subject
to trespass and illegal dumping or encampments. The BC zone allows for a mixture of
uses more compatible with the surrounding development and BC corridor identified in
the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP 2.7, II-14).
Public Works
Not applicable.
(iii) It is consistent with the comprehensive plan;
Rivera Property
Not applicable as the rezone is accompanied by a comprehensive plan map amendment.
Public Works
Not applicable.
(iv) It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the title, including those adopted by
reference from the comprehensive plan; and
Rivera Property
The proposal to rezone the Rivera Property from PO to BC is consistent with all
applicable provisions of the title, including those adopted by reference from the
comprehensive plan.
Page 17 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 15
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
Public Works
Not applicable.
(v) It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
Rivera Property
The proposal to rezone the Rivera Property from PO to BC is consistent with public
health, safety and welfare.
Public Works
By providing additional non-motorized improvements, the city is increasing the
opportunity for people to make healthy mobility choices.
XI. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Consistent with the provisions of FWRC 19.80.240, the Planning Commission may take the following
actions regarding each proposed comprehensive plan amendment and rezone request:
1 Recommend to City Council adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan
amendments as proposed;
2. Recommend to City Council that the proposed comprehensive plan amendments
not be adopted;
3. Forward the proposed comprehensive plan amendments to City Council without a
recommendation; or
4. Recommend to the City Council that the Rivera amendment be approved and the
Public Works Amendments be denied; or
5. Recommend to the City Council that the Public Works Amendments be approved
and the Rivera amendment be denied; or
6. Modify the proposed comprehensive plan amendments and recommend to City
Council adoption of the amendments, as modified.
Exhibits
• “A” City Center Extend BPA Trail (11th PL13th Ave S along north side of S. 324th St to 23rd Ave S)
• “B” City Center Extend BPA Trail (west side of 23rd Ave S from S. 324th to S. 320th ST
• “C” City Center S 324th ST & 23rd Ave S (Roadway Cross Section)
• “D” Federal Way Transit Center Pedestrian Connection (Construct Sidewalk)
• “E” North Fork West Hylebos Trail Approximate Location
• “F” North Fork West Hylebos Trail (Trail Cross Section)
• “G” North Fork West Hylebos Trial (Boardwalk Cross Section)
• “H” Public Works Sound Transit Non-Motorized Access Project
• “I” Zoning Map of Site-Specific Request #2 – Rivera
• “J” Aerial Map of Site-Specific Request #2 – Rivera
• “K” Lakehaven Water and Sewer Map 21-104065-UP
Page 18 of 74
Staff Report to Planning Commission Page 16
Public Hearing June 15, 2022 doc. id. 82301
• “L” CCA Outreach Report Summary Fall 2019
• “M” Capital Improvements Project 16 City Center
• “N” Capital Improvements Project 29 FWTC Pedestrian Access Improvements
• “O” Capital Improvements Project 42 West Hylebos Trail
• “P” Public Comment Steven Smith 5-1-22
• “Q” Public Comment Jim and Ramona High 4-22-22
• “R” Public Comment Harold G 4-24-22
• “S” Public Comment Loni Held 5-1-22
• “T” Public Comment Larry Menzel 5-11-22
• “U” Public Comment Kara Bee 4-27-22
• “V” Public Comment GP Ericksen 4-24-22
• “W” Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing
Page 19 of 74
Page 20 of 74
Page 21 of 74
Page 22 of 74
Page 23 of 74
Page 24 of 74
Page 25 of 74
Page 26 of 74
West Hylebos
Wetlands Park
Five
Mile Lake
Park
South County
Hylebos
Wetlands WestHylebosCreekH y l e b o s C re e k HylebosCreekH
ylebosCr
eekBrook
Lake
Lake
Geneva
Fivemile
Lake
Trout
Lake
Mud
Lake
Milton
Federal Way
19th Ave5thAve26th Ave Ct12thAveAlder St
S380Th St
28th Ave SS 376Th St
23rd Ave15th Ave23rdPl
S
Comet St 23rdAveSS 368
t
h
Pl
S 3 4 5 th S t32nd Ave SS 342nd St
35thWaySS lP ts131stAveSS 334th St
13th Pl SS 333rd St
S 357th St 42ndAveSS 352nd St45thAveS38thAveS
S 356th St
S 37 5 t h S t 45thW ayS37th Ave S2
6th
D
r
SS 371st PlForestLn
MiltonRdSUnnamed
25thAveCtSS 358th St
26th Ave S19thWaySS 380th S t20thAveS33rdPlSS340thSt
51stAveSS 356th P l2ndLnS
22ndAveSS 361st Pl
S 372nd Pl
S 380thPl 35th Ave SS 3 4 1s t Pl
40th Ave SWeyerhaeuserRd17thAveS46th Ave SS 371st St 38th Ave SS379 t h S t
S 370th St
S 363rd P ldPlSS333rd St
S 3 6 2 n dPl44th Ave S9thAveS18thAveS50th Ave SS 360th St
S 3 58t h St
8
t
h
A
veS
S 355th PlS333rdLn
S 374th St
S 376th StS334thSt S 338th St
S 349th St
17th
Ave40th Ave SS 351st St
S 332nd St
16th Ave SS 340th St
S 353rd Pl
48th Ave SS 337th Ln
S 368th StS364thWay
S 376th Pl S378
t
h
St 41stAveS41stPlS3rd Pl S38th Ave SS 344th St
12thPl
S
S 3 4 4thWay39th Ave SS369th St 45thPlSS341 stPl6thAveS1st
L
nS36th Pl SS 3 4 2n d P l45thAveSVirgi
niaCtS375t h P lS 340thPl
Unn
amedS lP ht0118th Pl SS evA ht8S lP ht432 1stAveSS 374th Pl
S 348th St
S 346th St
S 362nd St
44th Ave SS 359th St S354thSt21st Ave S37thPlS49th Ave SS evA ht7439th Ave S4th Ave SPrivate
Rd42nd Ave S30thAveS39thAv
e
S
S 352n
dLnS 343rd St
27thPl
SS 347th Pl
1
1
thPlS
S 347th St
S 367th Pl
S 338 t h S tPriv
a
t
eRd18thPlS12thAveSS 376th St S372ndW ay
S 3 5 5th St
S 364th St
S 366th St
S 344th StPrivateRd
S 365th St
SW 332ndPlS 364th St34th Ave S20thAveSMiltonR d S
S 349th St
28th Ave S9thAveSS 344th St Mil
i
t
aryRdSMilitary Rd SWeyerhaeuserWaySS 37
5
t
h
StS 333rd St20th Ave SS 352nd St
1st Ave SPeasleyCanyonWaySS 373rd St
S 356th St
S 336th St
1st
Wa
y
SS 360th St16th Ave SS 348th St
18
99
161
5
5
SF I-5SF I-5
SF Enchanted
Parkway (Design
Option)
SF Enchanted
Parkway (Design
Option)
SF EnchantedParkway
99
xrpa.sseccA_dezirotomnoN\sseccA_dezirotomnoN\spaM_aerA_noitatS\scoDpaM\SIG\scvS99\2 esahP ELDT 030-0081-455\gnireenignERDH-0081\stneilC\stcejorP\OSP\:U :htaP 1202/11/2 :etaDTacoma Dome Link Extension
South Federal Way
Figure 1
Source: WSDOT, Sound Transit, King County, Pierce County, City of Tacoma, Mapbox, OpenStreetMap
N 0 ½1¼Miles
PRELIMINARY DRAFT -
SUBJECT TO REVISIONS
Project cost
$Low
Med
High
$$
$$$
Project type
Bike Only
Ped Only
Bike and Ped
Station and
alignment alternative
Project Name
Description
Criteria Rating
Key to Rating
Lower
Performing
Higher
PerformingNOYES
Station access project
Street/path Intersection/ crossing
ProximityConnectionsMissing LinksFacility ConditionsBarriersCollision historyFacility ComfortUnderserved PopulationsY/N Y/N Y/N Y/N
SF 17
Construct separated bicycle
lanes
$$$
SF 7
Provide pedestrian safety
improvements
$SF 8
Provide pedestrian safety
improvements
$
SF 6
Construct multiuse path
through Hylebos Wetlands
$$
SF 18
Construct sidewalks and
bicycle lanes
$$
MARCH 2021
SF 10
Complete sidewalk gaps
$$
SF 13
Complete sidewalk gaps
$$
SF 11
Complete sidewalk gaps
$$
SF 9
Construct stair connection
$
SF 16
Construct separated bicycle
lanes with landscape buer
$$
SF 1
Bicycle safety and signal
improvements for pedestrians
$$
SF 14
Complete sidewalk gaps
$$
SF 15
Construct bicycle lanes and
connect to Interurban Trail
$$$
SF 12
Complete sidewalk gaps
$$
SF 4
Bicycle safety, sidewalk
and signal improvements
$$
SF 5
Construct nonmotorized
crossing of I-5
$$$
SF 3
Bicycle safety and signal
improvements for pedestrians
$
SF 2
Bicycle safety, sidewalk
and signal improvements
$$
Page 27 of 74
S 302ND ST
16TH AV SS 303RD STS 303RD ST 14TH AV S13TH
AVS
16TH AV S16TH AV SS 304TH ST
S 302ND ST PACIFIC HWY SPACIFIC HWY SS 304TH STS 304TH ST
13
T
HAVSS 305TH PL
First BaptistChurch
Federal WayHigh School
RS9.6 RM1800
RS9.6 BC
RM3600
RM1800RM2400BC
BC RS5.0
BC
RS9.6
RS9.6RS9.6
RM3600
BCBC
BC
PO
WetlandRating: I
WetlandRating: I
City of Federal Way
2022Site Specific Requestsfor Comprehensive Plan andZoning Designation Changes
This map is accompanied by no warranties, and is simply a graphic representation.!Existing DesignationsComprehensive Plan: Professional Office (PO)Zoning: Professional Office (PO)!Requested DesignationsComprehensive Plan: Community Business (BC)Zoning: Community Business (BC)
Rivera Pr operty
Exhibit #2
Legend
Site Specific Request
Buildings
Streets
Streams (City Survey)
Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
Zoning Boundary*
Note: An asterix (*) next to a zoning designation indicates the property isgoverned by a development agreement.
R:\erike\cd\Projects\SSR Complan\2022\Maps\ssr2_2022.mxd
0 500250
Feet´
Page 28 of 74
S 302ND ST
16TH AV SS 303RD STS 303RD ST 14TH AV S13TH
AVS
16TH AV S16TH AV SS 304TH ST
S 302ND ST PACIFIC HWY SPACIFIC HWY SS 304TH STS 304TH ST
13
T
HAVSS 305TH PL
First BaptistChurch
Federal WayHigh School
RS9.6 RM1800
RS9.6 BC
RM3600
RM1800RM2400BC
BC RS5.0
BC
RS9.6
RS9.6RS9.6
RM3600
BCBC
BC
PO
WetlandRating: I
WetlandRating: I
City of Federal Way
2022Site Specific Requestsfor Comprehensive Plan andZoning Designation Changes
0 500250
Feet´
This map is accompanied by no warranties, and is simply a graphic representation.!Existing DesignationsComprehensive Plan: Professional Office (PO)Zoning: Professional Office (PO)!Requested DesignationsComprehensive Plan: Community Business (BC)Zoning: Community Business (BC)
Rivera Pr operty
Exhibit #2
Legend
Site Specific Request
Streams (City Survey)
Wetlands (1998 City Survey)
Zoning Boundary*
Note: An asterix (*) next to a zoning designation indicates the property isgoverned by a development agreement.
R:\erike\cd\Projects\SSR Complan\2022\Maps\ssr2_2022_aerial.mxd Page 29 of 74
8" CONC8" CONC12" CONC
0253000220
1439
0253000215
1447
0253000210
1455
0253000205
1463
0253000200
1471
0521049183
30323
0521049202
30324
0521049204
30324
2500000000
30317
0521049118
30331
0521049203
30330
0421049237
30318
0421049040
30333
0921049036
30405
0821049001
31031
12"12"12"6"8"16"8"16"
12"6"12"16"6"12"8"16"16"12"S 304TH ST 16TH AVE S15TH CT S0 10050
Feet
NOTE: Lakehaven Water and Sewer
District neither warrants nor guarantees
the accuracy of any facility information
provided. Facility locations and conditions
are subject to field verification.
Rivera Complan Amendment & Rezone
21-104065-UP p12/9/21 BIA Page 30 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 1
Community Outreach Summary
Prepared for:
Community Outreach
Summary
May – October 2019
Proposed Solution
Prepared by:
Page 31 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 2
Community Outreach Summary
Contents
Project overview ............................................................................................................................ 4
Project background ................................................................................................................... 4
Report summary ........................................................................................................................ 4
Approach ................................................................................................................................... 5
By the numbers ......................................................................................................................... 5
Key themes ............................................................................................................................... 5
Traffic congestion .................................................................................................................. 5
Interchange modification recommendations .......................................................................... 6
Local impacts ......................................................................................................................... 6
Construction and property acquisition ................................................................................... 6
Multi-modal options and safety .............................................................................................. 6
Project coordination ............................................................................................................... 6
Open space and environmental impacts ............................................................................... 6
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 6
Stakeholder summary ................................................................................................................... 7
Outreach methods ..................................................................................................................... 7
Tabling events ....................................................................................................................... 7
Emails .................................................................................................................................... 7
Flyer distribution .................................................................................................................... 7
Key findings ............................................................................................................................... 8
General .................................................................................................................................. 8
S 324th Street interchange solution ....................................................................................... 8
Local street improvements ..................................................................................................... 8
Stakeholder interviews .............................................................................................................. 9
Stakeholder briefings ................................................................................................................. 9
Environmental justice briefings ................................................................................................ 10
Key findings ......................................................................................................................... 10
EJ briefing summary ............................................................................................................ 11
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 12
Open house summary ................................................................................................................. 13
Outreach methods ................................................................................................................... 13
Direct email .......................................................................................................................... 13
Print media ........................................................................................................................... 14
Page 32 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 3
Community Outreach Summary
Direct mail ............................................................................................................................ 14
Flyer distribution .................................................................................................................. 15
Social media ........................................................................................................................ 15
Telephone hotline ................................................................................................................ 15
Online and in-person open house key findings ....................................................................... 15
Nonmotorized access and mobility ...................................................................................... 16
Proposed intersection controls ............................................................................................ 16
Local impacts ....................................................................................................................... 16
Next steps ................................................................................................................................... 17
APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. 18
Appendix 1: Stakeholder outreach materials ....................................................................... 19
Appendix 2: Open house outreach materials ....................................................................... 22
Appendix 3: Online open house ......................................................................................... 28
Page 33 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 4
Community Outreach Summary
Project overview
The City of Federal Way relaunched its City Center Access Project in 2017 to address
increasing congestion in the City Center and surrounding areas. In 2018 and 2019, the City
evaluated ways to reduce congestion in the City Center and make it easier for people to travel
into, out of and around the City Center.
The City evaluated solutions in the area of the S 320th Street corridor between SR 99 (Pacific
Highway) and Military Road S with the goal of improving quality of life and economic vitality for
the City Center.
After evaluating improvements to local streets, the project team concluded they need to change
access to the City Center from I-5 to achieve the project’s goals. The project team is now
refining a proposed solution at S 324th Street, selecting an option from a wider range of
possible solutions we identified earlier in the project. Community outreach and continuous traffic
modeling is helping the project team fine tune a solution to present to City Council for approval
in late 2019.
Project background
The Federal Way City Center is comprised of both the City Center Core, an urban
center/regional growth center, and the City Center Frame, which is a mixed-use zone that
surrounds and supports the core. Together, they complement each other to create a
“downtown” area as outlined in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City Center is bounded by I-
5 to the east, S 312th Street to the north, 11th Place S to the south, and 13th Avenue S to the
west.
The project team analyzed past, current, and future traffic trends, expected needs for residents,
commuters, and businesses in the area. The project team also evaluated the environmental
impacts that are associated with:
• Improving nonmotorized mobility access.
• Increasing safety and efficiency.
• Improving and enhancing transit operations.
• Coordinating with other local transit projects.
• Improving travel around, rather than through, the City Center core.
• Improving access to and from I-5.
This evaluation process is identified in the City of Federal Way 6-Year Transportation
Improvement Plan (TIP) as an environmental documentation study. The City used the study to
identify plans to modify access at S 320th Street and S 324th Street along I-5, and other local
infrastructure improvement needs.
Report summary
From May to October 2019, the project team held a series of community outreach events
including tabling at community festivals, hosting briefings for project neighbors, businesses and
organizations serving environmental justice populations, stakeholder interviews, and an online
and in-person open house. The project team incorporated the feedback gathered from these
events into their evaluation of solutions to reduce congestion in the City Center.
Page 34 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 5
Community Outreach Summary
This report summarizes the City’s community outreach efforts and feedback we received from
local residents, businesses, and other key stakeholders.
Approach
Project team members used various outreach methods to inform the public and invite
participation to help narrow down possible solutions. The project team used outreach methods
to target both narrow and broad audiences, based on specific community interests, issues or
known concerns. Community members communicated with the project team in-person at
events, online and over the phone.
By the numbers
Date Attendees
Open houses
In-person open house Oct. 10, 2019 38
Online open house Oct. 1-14, 2019 434
Stakeholder briefings
Project area businesses May 21, 2019 2
Project area neighbors May 14 & 20, 2019 35
Belmor Park Aug. 20, 2019 110
Federal Way Chamber of Commerce Oct. 8, 2019 8
Stakeholder interviews
Target stakeholders July 24 - Oct 10, 2019 6
Environmental Justice (EJ) Briefings
Community Connections Roundtable July 2, 2019 15
Sea Mar Community Health Centers Sept. 20, 2019 2
Build the Bridge (BTB) Oct. 1, 2019 5
Multi-Service Center (MSC) Oct. 15, 2019 40
Social media
City of Federal Way Facebook Oct. 3, 2019 2,040*
Sound Transit Facebook Oct. 3, 2019 32,229*
Total 34,958
*Number of Facebook followers on the page
Key themes
• Traffic congestion
• Interchange modification recommendations
• Local impacts
• Multimodal options and safety
• Project coordination
• Open space and environmental impacts
Traffic congestion
Residents and local business representatives shared that they are experiencing more
congestion entering and leaving the City Center. Participants shared concerns about traffic
backing up onto local surface streets and problems with current infrastructure. Most participants
agreed that congestion in the City Center, and Federal Way, is a growing concern the City
should address.
Page 35 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 6
Community Outreach Summary
Interchange modification recommendations
Most individuals did not oppose changing the S 324th Street interchange. They generally
understood why the City is pursuing this option. A majority of commenters supported building
roundabouts to access S 324th Street from I-5, but suggested the City educate people on how
to use roundabouts safely. Most participants were unfamiliar or knew little about diverging
diamond interchanges so either did not provide feedback or did not think it was a good idea.
Local impacts
Most participants did not oppose local improvements at S 320th and S 324th streets. However,
several participants expressed concern about losing parking at the park and ride near the future
Sound Transit light rail station, and potential roadway improvements near Steel Lake Park.
Participants at the neighborhood briefings in May shared significant concerns about local street
improvements impacting the rural neighborhood character east of I-5 at S 312th Street and
32nd Avenue S.
Construction and property acquisition
Several neighborhood briefing attendees shared concerns about construction, including
property acquisition and project funding. Business representatives and some residents were
concerned businesses will face an economic burden because already underperforming
shopping centers in the area will have less business during the construction from major transit
projects.
Multimodal options and safety
Many commenters supported the City creating pathways for people walking and biking, and
better access to transit. Participants supported pedestrian bridges to separate people walking
from vehicle traffic. Participants would like to see more sidewalks within the City Center on both
sides of the road, and longer crosswalk times for people walking and biking across major roads.
Project coordination
Many participants urged the City to coordinate with other major transit projects, such as the
Federal Way/Tacoma Dome Link Extension project, to reduce impact and disruption to the
community. Participants were concerned building these projects at the same time could
increase congestion and lead to longer commute times. Other participants expressed concern
about potential impacts to their homes and the relocation process.
Open space and environmental impacts
Many participants feared possible solutions would compromise green space and parks and said
preserving these spaces is a priority. These participants do not oppose the project so long as
construction of roads remains outside of parks or recreational spaces such as golf courses.
Many participants expressed concern about potential impacts to the environment, including
wetlands, natural water sources, and trees. Community members encourage the City to
preserve these resources.
Conclusion
The community members we engaged during this process generally support the modifying the S
324th Street interchange to help ease congestion into, out of, and around the City Center.
Participants wanted to stay informed and understand how the City plans to implement the
solution. As the project progresses into design and environmental review, the City will continue
to engage the community and share information.
Page 36 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 7
Community Outreach Summary
Stakeholder summary
The City of Federal Way conducted community outreach in spring and summer 2019 to evaluate
possible solutions. Our goal was to understand community sentiments about the interchange
modification solutions and local roadway improvements that would change the way people enter
and exit the City Center from I-5.
The project team collected community feedback through the following activities:
• Targeted neighborhood briefings in the project area
• A briefing for City Center businesses
• An in-person and online open house open to the public
• Briefings to service providers targeting environmental justice communities
• Interviews with stakeholders previously engaged in 2018
Outreach methods
The project team announced these activities using the following methods:
• Tabling events
• Door-to-door outreach
• Emails to project listserv
Stakeholder outreach by the numbers Total
Tabling event contacts 124
Emails 315
Door-to-door outreach – businesses 284
Door-to-door outreach – residences 253
Total 976
Tabling events
The project team hosted information tables at two major events in Federal Way: The Red White
and Blues Festival on July 4 and the Summer Sounds Music Festival on Aug. 20. The project
team provided fact sheets in English, Spanish, and Korean as well as display boards featuring
the proposed solutions. Visitors to the project booth won prizes by spinning a wheel and left
contact information to receive project updates.
Emails
The project team emailed updates to community members to share the latest project information
and promote outreach events. Emails included a brief description about the solutions, the
evaluation criteria, public outreach recaps, and opportunities for community members to provide
input.
Flyer distribution
On May 16 and May 17, 2019, project staff visited 273 businesses in downtown Federal Way to
invite business owners or their representatives to a briefing on Tuesday, May 21, 2019. They
spoke with managers and employees at businesses at the Gateway Center, The Commons
Mall, the Celebration Center, Pavilion Centre, Pavilion Centre II and businesses along 23rd
Avenue S, Pacific Highway, S 316th Street, and S 320th Street about the project.
Page 37 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 8
Community Outreach Summary
Project staff gave each business invitations to the briefing. We engaged people at most
businesses in conversations about the project. Many of the managers and employees were
unaware of project and agreed traffic in the City Center is a growing concern.
Key findings
The City of Federal Way interviewed six commercial property owners and business leaders and
participated in four briefings with residents and businesses from May through Oct. 2019. Most
participants did not oppose the City’s proposed interchange modification at S 324th Street and
agreed congestion in the City Center is growing and disruptive.
General
• Participants take alternate routes to avoid S 320th Street
• Participants were concerned about the potential changing traffic patterns which may
divert traffic into their neighborhoods
• Participants were worried the solutions may increase commute times
• Participants suggested more proactive communications from the City through more
frequent email updates, social media event reminders or reader board signs
S 324th Street interchange solution
• Participants generally agreed this is a reasonable solution
• Stakeholders agreed a couplet along S 320th and S 324th streets west of I-5 negatively
impacts businesses
Local street improvements
• Participants appreciated the east to west connection created by expanding S 324th
Street to Weyerhauser Way S
• Participants shared concerns about potential impacts to the natural environment
including the removal of trees and potential damage to pipelines
• Some stakeholders were concerned that HOV lanes will not be effective and may make
it harder for travelers to access businesses along S 320th Street
Business groups Number of
businesses
The Commons 72
Pavilions Center 23
Pavilions Center II 27
Celebration Center 35
Gateway Center 21
Hwy 99 to Reichbauer Way; 316th and 320th (49), Reichbauer Way and 23rd
Avenue S Ave; S 316th Street and S 320th Street (33), 23rd Ave and I5 (13) 95
Total 273
Page 38 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 9
Community Outreach Summary
Stakeholder interviews
The project team interviewed six commercial property owners and business representatives
during July, August, and October 2019. We have previously engaged with these stakeholders
and followed up with them to share our proposed solution. We will consider their input as we
finalize the proposed solution. These stakeholders shared their experience of heavy traffic
within the City Center and agreed that solutions that will ease congestion to help people get
around the area are necessary.
Name Organization Interview date Audience/Property
Represented
Blaine Burnett The Hynes Group
July 24, 2019 Belmor Park
Lindy Goodling
Harsch Investment
Properties
July 31, 2019
Celebration Centre,
Pavilions Centre II, and
SeaTac Village (manage
only)
Dana Ostenson Industrial Realty Group Aug. 12, 2019
The Greenline (Former
Weyerhaeuser Campus),
East Campus Tech Center
Rich Schokley
Federal Way Chamber
of Commerce and
Highline College
Aug. 15, 2019
Federal Way Chamber
current and future
businesses and college
students
Daryl Reichstein Rosen Properties Aug. 15, 2019 Hillside Shopping Center,
Fountain Plaza
Loretta Messick MJR Development Oct. 10, 2019 Federal Way Center, Heron
Building, Talon Building
The majority of commercial property owners and business participants we spoke to agreed the
City needs to ease congestion within the City Center. Participants also said the City needs to
understand traffic impacts related to the future light rail station and temporary impacts during
construction. A participant also commented the City needs to remain aware of how changes in
the way people move around the city may affect residents in nearby communities by creating
longer commute times, adding more traffic to residential streets, and affecting safety for people
walking and biking.
Half of the stakeholders suggested the City research how other nearby cities, including Seattle,
Renton, and Bellevue, are addressing congestion. Participants also wanted more sidewalks,
bike paths and access to public transit.
Stakeholder briefings
The City hosted seven business and community briefings about the City Center Access project
during May, August, September, and October 2019. The City invited neighborhood leaders and
property owners via email and distributed flyers door-to-door. The project team also invited
Chamber of Commerce members to a briefing via the Chamber’s newsletter. About 190
community members attended the five briefings.
Page 39 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 10
Community Outreach Summary
Business Briefing Date Location Attendees
Project area businesses May 21, 2019 Federal Way City
Council Chambers
2
Federal Way Chamber of
Commerce Oct 8, 2019
Federal Way
Chamber of
Commerce
8
South King Fire and Rescue Oct 8, 2019 South King Fire
and Rescue
10
Project area bankers Sep 27, 2019 Federal Way
PAEC
10
Project area business
owners Sep 26, 2019 Federal Way
PAEC
15
Community Briefing Date Location Attendees
Project area neighbors May 14 & 20, 2019 Federal Way City
Council Chambers
35
Belmor Park Aug 20, 2019 Belmor Park
Clubhouse
110
Total 190
Many attendees wanted the City to create better east to west connections and support a new
interchange at S 324th Street. Attendees supported local improvements as long as those
improvements do not make it harder for residents to get to surrounding neighborhoods.
Attendees asked about how the City is funding design and construction and if funding requires
voter approval. In addition, all meeting attendees encouraged the City to coordinate with Sound
Transit and expressed concern about how construction could affect their homes and
businesses. Although most attendees considered an interchange at S 324th Street a viable
option, some were confused about the project’s purpose.
Many viewed the City Center as a pathway for people to travel home and not necessarily a
destination for shopping. The connection between placing an interchange at S 324th Street and
reducing congestion in the City Center core did not connect for some attendees since many do
not spend time in that area. A few attendees asked about ways to connect with City staff to
voice future questions or concerns. Many attendees also asked for more frequent
communication from the project team especially related to local street improvements and work
impacting surrounding neighborhoods.
Environmental justice briefings
The project team conducted four environmental justice (EJ) briefings in 2019 to a total of 22
attendees.
Project team members briefed attendees about the possible interchange modifications and local
street improvements, collected feedback to inform the evaluation, and discussed the project
timeline and opportunities for public involvement moving forward.
Key findings
• Concerns about displacing vulnerable community members as a result of the project.
• Concerns about mobility for older adults and those living with disabilities in the City
Center core.
Page 40 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 11
Community Outreach Summary
• General support for the project and interest in the potential options for the proposed
solution (e.g. diverging diamond v. roundabouts, pedestrian and bicycle improvements,
etc.).
• Concerns about emergency service access to the roads in the couplet alternative.
• Questions and concerns about project funding and approval process.
• Questions about a lack of an interchange modification at S 288th Street, especially since
high levels of congestion are present in that area.
• Questions and concerns about access to jobs and resources and if any aspects of the
proposed solutions will negatively impact these things.
• Question about the impact the construction of Sound Transit’s future light rail station and
the proposed interchange modifications will have on traffic moving through the City
Center
EJ briefing summary
The City Center Access Project team presented to four organizations and coalitions as part of
its environmental justice work.
Environmental Justice
Briefing Date Attendees Location
Korean Quarterly June 27, 2019 40 Federal Way City Hall
Federal Way Community
Connections Roundtable July 2, 2019 15 Federal Way Public
Library
Sea Mar Community Health
Centers Sept. 20, 2019 2 Sea Mar Federal Way
Medical Clinic
Build the Bridge (BTB) Oct. 1, 2019
5 Federal Way City Hall
in the Hylebos room,
2nd floor
Multi-Service Center (MSC) Oct. 15, 2019 40 Multi-Service Center,
Federal Way
Total 102
The organizations represented at these briefings include:
• CHI Franciscan
• Multi-Service Center
• Puget Sound Educational Service District
• City of Federal Way Department of Community Development
• SoCo Culture
• Federal Way Library (King County Library System)
• Federal Way Public Schools
• Korean Women’s Association
Page 41 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 12
Community Outreach Summary
• Urban League of Seattle
Project team members presented the project purpose and need, including accommodating
planned growth in the City Center, addressing more traffic delays and backups onto I-5,
improving access to emergency services, and planning for long-term needs. They reviewed how
they evaluated local street improvements and discussed their conclusion that the City needs to
modify the interchange to reduce congestion on S 320th Street.
The City Center project team explained why the City is no longer considering the S 312th Street
interchange option and other interchanges. In September, the presentation included the
interchange modification at S 324th Street the team identified as its proposed solution, and in
October, included a walkthrough of the online open house. Visuals relating to the possible
interchange modifications and bicycle and pedestrian connections under evaluation were in all
briefings. All briefings concluded with the presenter discussing next steps and noting how the
project team is encouraging broader community participation with an online and in-person open
house.
Attendees asked questions, voiced concerns, and shared comments as a full group throughout
the briefings.
Conclusion
About 298 people gave feedback on the City’s solutions through stakeholder interviews and
community and business briefings. Overall, participants do not oppose the project or the
proposed solution, however some attendees expressed concern about a lack of public input.
Concerns often included issues related to Sound Transit’s plans for the area and coordination
with the City Center Access Project. Others voiced concerns about impact to mobility and transit
access for those from vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and disabled. Many attendees
and interview participants wish to receive more frequent updates from the City.
Page 42 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 13
Community Outreach Summary
Open house summary
The project team hosted an online and in-person open house in October to share the proposed
solution at S 324th Street and gather public feedback on the solution and three major design
questions:
• Ramp configurations
• Intersection controls
• Nonmotorized connections
The project team received 41 written comments and interacted with 452 participants.
Date Channels Comments Attendees
Oct. 1-14 Online open house 35 434
Oct. 10 In-person open house 10 38
Oct. 3 Social media -- 2,040*
Oct. 1 Postcards -- 24,244**
Sept. 20, 27 Print media circulation -- 29,167***
Total: 25 55,923
*Number of Facebook followers
**Households receiving postcard
***Households receiving Federal Way Mirror
Outreach methods
The City used diverse tactics to reach a broad group of community members, including
• Email updates
• Newspaper notice
• Postcards
• Flyers to community gathering
places
• Social media
• Telephone hotline
Email
On October 1, the project team emailed 280
members of the project’s listserv to
announce the selection of the proposed
solution as well as the launch of the online
open house.
The project listserv includes:
• Briefing attendees
• Community members,
organizations, and business representatives who opted-in to the Project’s contact
listserv
• Commercial property owners and managers who participated in stakeholder interviews
The email provided a brief description of the proposed solution, the dates for the online and in-
person open house, and invited readers to attend both to leave final comments for consideration
The study team mailed 24,244 postcards to invite the
community to an in-person open house on Oct.10,
2019.
Page 43 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 14
Community Outreach Summary
before the project team presents the final proposed solution to
City Council on November 5. The email closed with the phone
number for the project hotline where members of the community
can call and provide feedback over the phone.
Print media
The City posted a legal notice in the Federal Way Mirror
newspaper advertising both online and in person open houses.
The notice highlighted project partners, as well as the importance
of collecting input for further evaluations before presenting a final
proposed solution to City Council on November 5. The newspaper
ran the legal notice in physical publications on September 20 and
27.
Direct mail
The City mailed postcard invitations to 24,244 addresses which
arrived in their mailboxes on October 1. The postcard included a
brief project overview, a link to the online open house, and details
about the in-person open house. The City mailed the postcard to
addresses from the northern boundary of S 272nd Street south to
SR 18 to ensure people who frequently use those interchanges
could provide feedback. To increase the input from residents and
business owners who use S 320th Street and other City Center
roads, the City included addresses west to First Avenue and east
to the Auburn city limits.
The project team mailed postcards to addresses in the project area,
including addresses west to First Avenue and east to the Auburn city limits.
The Federal Way Mirror ran a public
notice on Sept. 20 and 27 notifying
community members of the Oct. 10
in-person open house.
Page 44 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 15
Community Outreach Summary
Flyer distribution
On October 1, we distributed flyers to 28 Federal Way community gathering places, including
churches, the Federal Way Transit Center, Federal Way Senior Center, Korean Women’s
Association, and nine grocery stores frequented by residents in the project area. We gave
someone at each location a flyer or poster and talked with them, sharing project information,
describing ways for interested community members to participate, and answering questions.
We reached out to places where limited English proficient populations gather, such as ethnic
grocery stores or churches offering services in non-English languages. We distributed flyers,
encouraged them to attend the open house and assured those who spoke Spanish and/or
Korean that interpreters would be available at the open house.
The study team also posted multiple flyers at the Federal
Way Transit Center near busy bus stops.
Social media
The City created an event on Facebook announcing the
launch of the City Center Access project online open house
as well as the date of the in-person open house. The
posting included start and end dates and times for both and
invited the public to visit and leave comments based on the
information shared by the project team.
Telephone hotline
The City of Federal Way created a project hotline for the
City Center Access project to address in a timely manner
the public’s questions, comments, and concerns. The hotline
is available, after callers select their language, in Spanish,
Korean, and English. No exchanges occurred between
callers and project team staff checking the hotline.
Online open house
Online and in-person open house key
findings
The below key themes emerged from the
comments we received from the online and in-
person open houses. We asked participants for
their thoughts on the proposed solution, whether it
addressed their previous input, their preference
for intersection controls, and thoughts on
nonmotorized elements of the solution. Feedback
mirrored these questions closely, centering
around nonmotorized access and mobility and
proposed intersection modifications.
Key themes include:
• Improving access and mobility for people
walking and biking.
On October 3, the City of Federal Way
posted a Facebook event advertising City
Center Access open house.
The online open house collected comments from
Oct. 1-14, 2019.
Page 45 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 16
Community Outreach Summary
• Proposed intersection modifications are
acceptable.
• Concerns about additional weave in hybrid
option.
• Concerns about local impacts.
• Traffic congestion is a growing concern.
Mobility for nonmotorized users
Online participants commented they are
experiencing growing congestion entering and
leaving the City Center. Most participants urged the
City to develop a plan to improve connections for
people walking and riding bicycles. Some
participants suggested adding more bike lanes or a
shared use path for pedestrians and bicyclists. One
participant asked the City to add sidewalks on both
sides of arterial roadways leading to and from the
City Center–the lack of sidewalks forces people to
walk across the street illegally. Some residents expressed that bike lanes are hazardous for
drivers. One participant commented that roundabouts would improve pedestrian safety. One
participant expressed concern about safely getting to the Commons shopping center from
Belmor Park.
Proposed intersection controls
Most participants supported adding roundabouts to ease congestion but asked the City to
provide information about how to use roundabouts. The diverging diamond design option
concerned several participants. They shared that “weaving” and “cutting across” lanes would
confuse drivers and could lead to collisions. Some participants suggested coordinating traffic
signals to reduce current congestion. Other participants noted concern about traffic on S 320th
Street and potential road widening that may affect power towers in the area.
Local impacts
Several participants gave feedback about
impacts to local roadways. They expressed
concerns about losing parking at the park and
ride near the future Sound Transit light rail
station, and potential roadway improvements
near Steel Lake Park. One participant shared
concern that street improvements would
increase traffic near a park at S 312th Street
and 32nd Avenue. Another participant
suggested moving the project area away from
a senior living center at Belmor Park, to limit
noise, traffic and access impacts to residents.
Live, work, and play map
Responding to an interactive map, most
participants indicated they live inside the
Federal Way city limits. Generally, visitors
noted their workplaces along the I-5 corridor
Open house attendees placed stickers on a map outlining the
City of Federal Way to mark where they live (green), work
(orange), and play (yellow).
Open house attendees provided feedback on boards
stationed around the open house.
Page 46 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 17
Community Outreach Summary
and mostly outside the City Center. Residents also shared that they recreate along the
waterfront, at parks in Federal Way, and within the City Center.
Next steps
The project team will review all comments and use them to help refine the proposed solution
before presenting it to City Council on Nov. 5 for a vote in late 2019.
Page 47 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 18
Community Outreach Summary
APPENDICES
Page 48 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 19
Community Outreach Summary
Appendix 1: Stakeholder outreach materials
Appendix 1.1: Flyer for neighborhood briefings on May 14 and May 20, 2019
Page 49 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 20
Community Outreach Summary
Appendix 1.2: Email to attendees from May neighborhood briefings.
Page 50 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 21
Community Outreach Summary
Appendix 1.3: Flyer for Belmor Park residents advertising a City Center Access project team lead
neighborhood briefing
Page 51 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 22
Community Outreach Summary
Appendix 2: Open house outreach materials
Appendix 2.1: Email to project listserv announcing launch of online open house
Page 52 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 23
Community Outreach Summary
Appendix 2.2: Front and back view of open house postcards delivered to residences in a specified radius
within the Federal Way City Center area, delivered Oct. 1.
Page 53 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 24
Community Outreach Summary
Appendix 2.3: Open house postcard distribution map
Page 54 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 25
Community Outreach Summary
Appendix 2.4: City of Federal Way Facebook event for City Center Access open house
Page 55 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 26
Community Outreach Summary
Appendix 2.5: Public notice for City Center Access online and in-person open house in the Federal Way
Mirror newspaper
Page 56 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 27
Community Outreach Summary
Appendix 2.6: Flyer for City Center Access online and in-person open house given to businesses in the
area to publicly display.
Page 57 of 74
Federal Way City Center Access Project – Proposed Solution 28
Community Outreach Summary
Appendix 3: Online open house
Page 58 of 74
Page 59 of 74
Page 60 of 74
Page 61 of 74
Page 62 of 74
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
2022 City of Federal Way Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Rivera Property Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone
Public Works Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Non-Motorized
Transportation Improvements
(Non-Project Actions)
File Number’s: 22-100262-UP; 21-104065-UP; 22-101175-SE
The City of Federal Way’s Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Wednesday, June 15,
2022, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers (City Hall, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA
98063-9718). The commission will hear testimony and provide a recommendation to the City Council’s
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) and City Council on a proposed comprehensive plan
amendment and rezone of Rivera Property, located at 1600 S 304th Street, parcel #052104-9204, and the
Public Works Non-Motorized Transportation Improvements at various locations across the city as
follows:
1. File #21-104065-UP, Richard Rivera Property – Request for a
comprehensive plan amendment and rezone of parcel no. 052104-9204 (1.26-
acre site), located at 1600 South 304th Street, from Professional Office (PO)
to Community Business (BC).
2. File #22-100262-UP, a request from the City of Federal Way Public Works for the
following non-motorized transportation projects:
• City Center:
Extend BPA Trail from 11th PL/13th Ave S along north side of S. 324th St to 23rd
Ave S and along west side of 23rd Ave S from S. 324th to S. 320th Street. See
attached exhibit “A” “B” and “C” for plans and cross section. This project is
included under City’s CIP (Project #16).
• Federal Way Transit Center Pedestrian Connection:
Construct sidewalk to preserve pedestrian access between large blocks with in
City Center as shown in exhibit “D”. This project is included under City’s CIP
(Project # 29).
• North Fork West Hylebos Trail:
Construct Trail within Spring Valley along North Fork of West Hylebos Creek
as shown in Exhibit “E”. Typical cross section in nonenvironmental sensitive
areas (Asphalt Concrete) and environmentally sensitive areas (Board Walk) are
shown in Exhibit “F” and Exhibit “G”, respectively. This project is included
under City’s CIP (Project # 42)
Page 63 of 74
• Non-Motorized Facilities Around South Federal Way Transit Station adding
the following non-motorized capital projects:
Project Description
1 S. 359th: SR 99 to SR 161: Construct sidewalk and bike lanes on both sides of
the street
2 16th Avenue S: S. 359th to S. 364th Way: Construct sidewalk and bike lanes on
both sides of the street
3 S. 359th and SR 161: Construct staircase and ADA accessible ramp
4 I-5 Crossing: S. 359th to 20th Avenue S: Construct non-motorized crossing
5 20th Avenue S and S. 360th: SR 161 to 32nd Avenue S: Construct sidewalk and
bike lanes on both sides of the street
6 Milton Road S: SR 161 to S 369th St: Construct sidewalk and bike lanes on
both sides of the street
7 SR 161: Milton Rd to S 380th St: Construct sidewalk and bike lanes on both
sides of the street
8 SR 161: S. 352nd to S.359th: Construct separated bicycle lanes with landscape
buffer
9 S. 356th St: SR 99 to 1st Avenue S: Construct sidewalk and bike lanes on both
sides of the street
The official file is available for public review through the Community Development Department
https://www.cityoffederalway.com/page/land-use-notices. A staff report will be available on Tuesday June
7, 2022. Interested persons may submit written comments to the Planning Commission prior to the hearing,
present written comments to the commission during the hearing, and/or may appear at the hearing to
provide verbal testimony.
For additional information please contact Associate Planner Natalie Kamieniecki, 253-835-2638, or
natalie.kamieniecki@cityoffederalway.com
Published in the Federal Way Mirror on May 27, 2022.
Page 64 of 74
Page 65 of 74
Page 66 of 74
Page 67 of 74
Page 68 of 74
Page 69 of 74
Page 70 of 74
Page 71 of 74
Page 72 of 74
Page 73 of 74
Page 74 of 74