04-104823 F ILE
` CITY OF CITY HALL
' 33325 Avenue South• Box 9718
Federal Way Federal
Way,WA 98063 97171 8
(253)835-7000
www.cityoffederal wa y.com
April21,2005
Dean Michelson
Redondo Bay Homeowners Association
324 South 295th Place
Federal Way,WA 98023
RE: File No:04-104823-000-00-UP;USE PROCESS I APPROVAL
Redondo Bay HOA Greenbelt Vegetation Management Plan
Dear Mr.Michelson:
The City has completed an administrative review of the proposed April 11,2005 Vegetation Management Plan,
prepared by Bryce R.Landrud,ISA Certified Arborist#PN0232,of Arborscan for a portion of the Greenbelt at the
Survey of Redondo.The proposed Vegetation Management Plan is hereby approved based on the following two
conditions:
1) This approval applies only to the area shown on the approved plan.
2) No Land Surface Modification,which includes clearing or removal of trees,shrubs,groundcover and
other vegetation and all grading,excavation and filling activities,is permitted in the Greenbelt area.
Removal of Himalayan Blackberry and Scotch Broom is permitted pursuant to Federal Way City Code
(FWCC)Section 22-1093(9).
The Vegetation Management Plan shall be construed as an ongoing maintenance plan for vegetation within the
Greenbelt.Please be advised that the City shall retain the right to rescind this approval should any of the following
be determined to have occurred as a result of implementation of the Vegetation Management Plan: 1)adverse
affect to water quality within the Greenbelt;2)destruction or damage of significant habitat area;3)adverse affect
to drainage or stormwater retention capability;and/or,4)create unstable earth conditions or create erosion
hazards.
This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way code,policies,and standards relating to
this site.The effective date of this decision is April 25,2005.Pursuant to Federal Way City Code(FWCC)
Section 22-356,any person who received notice of the administrative decision may appeal this decision to the
Federal Way Hearing Examiner by May 9,2005.Please be aware that no work on the proposal can commence
until the end of the appeal period.However,in that you are the only party of record,you may waive your right to
appeal this decision.The City must receive this waiver in writing.Waiver of the right to appeal does not affect the
effective date of this decision.Therefore,if you choose to waive your right to appeal,you could begin work on the
proposal on April 25,2005.
Should you have any questions about this letter,please call Jane Gamble,Associate Planner,at 253-835-2644.
Sincerely,
'=e; 11,1
Kathy McI lung,Director
Community Development Services
enc: Approved Site Plan
04-104823
Doc.I.D.31326
F ILE
` CITY OF CITY HALL
Federal Way 33325Feder 8th Avenue South• Box 9718
Federal Way,WA 98063-971718
a,= (253)835-7000
www.cityoffedera l wa y.com
March 23,2005
Dean Michelson
Redondo Bay Home Owners Association
324 295th Place
Federal Way, WA 98023
RE: File No: 04-104823-000-00-UP;RESPONSE TO SUBMITTED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
Redondo Bay HOA Greenbelt .
Dear Mr.Michelson:
The City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services staff has reviewed the Vegetation
Management Plan submitted to the City February 24,2005.The Vegetation Management Plan,prepared by
Arborscan on February 23,2005,proposes removing approximately 1/3 of the 210 alder saplings in the Native:
Growth Protection Easement(NGPE)of the Record of Survey for Redondo Bay.Pursuant to Federal Way City
code(FWCC)22-1 (enclosed),removal of trees,among other activities,constitutes a Land Surface Modification .
(LSM).which is regulated under FWCC Section 22-1093(enclosed).
In that the proposed Vegetation Management Plan LSM is not permitted outright as identified iii=FWCC Section
22-1093 (1-13),the proposal would be subject to Process III review and the decisional criteria for Process III
approval identified in FWCC Section 22-1094(c)(3)(a-c).Please be advised,any proposal involving a non . .
exempted LSM exceeds the scope of the Temporary Encroachment in Environmentally Sensitive Area.Setback for
Vegetation Control and View Enhancement,as identified in the July 31, 1997,memorandum from Gregory -
Moore,Director of Community Development Services.Upon reviewing code requirements,staff has determined •
that the proposed removal of alder saplings within the NGPE will not likely meet any of the decisional criteria.
identified in FWCC Section 22-1094(c)(3)(a-c),and as such would not qualify for Process III approval. If the
applicant nonetheless chooses to pursue Process III approval pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1094,please be
advised that State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)review would likely be required.
In order to proceed with the proposal under the current Process I application,the applicant is required to revise the
egetat:ion Management Plan to include only tree and vegetation trimming and exclude removal of any vegetation
i=.,cutting of trees,whether significant or not).The applicant may want to include a seasonal maintenance plan
w€tr the.Vegetation Management Plan,so that approval can be ongoing.
If you have any questions regarding this letter,please feel free to contact me at 253-835-2644.
Sincerely,
*61/40
Jane Gamble
Associate Planner
enc. FWCC 22-1
FWCC Section 22,D=vision.7,Land Modifications
M-104823. Doc.I.D.31019
k CITY OF CITY HALL
33325
Federal Way Feder Avenue South• Box 9718
Federall Way,WA 98063-971718
(253)835-7000
www.cityoffedera/waycom
December 6,2004 "
FR 2 4 2005
Dean Michelson uI FY OF FEDERAL WAY
Redondo Bay Homeowners'Association BUILDING DEPT.
324 SW 295m Place
Federal Way, WA 98023
RE: File No: 04-104823-000-00-UP;REPLY TO INQUIRY FOR VEGETATION CONTROL
Redondo Bay Greenbelt,Federal Way
Dear Mr.Michelson:
On November 30,2004,the City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services received your
Use Process I application to top,thin,and maintain trees within the designated Native Growth Protection
Easements of Redondo Bay Survey.Please be advised that the submitted information is inadequate for the City to
proceed with the review of your application at this time. Enclosed is a July 31, 1997 memorandum, from the
Director of Community Development Services,which identifies the minimum application requirements to apply
for a temporary encroachment in environmentally sensitive area setback for vegetation control and view
enhancement. This memorandum also identifies the Decisional Criteria by which such an application would be
reviewed. In order to proceed with your proposal,the following issue must be addressed:A vegetation control
plan,prepared by a certified arborist and containing all of the information identified in the July 31, 1997
memorandum(referred to above),must be submitted for review. The required vegetation control plan must clearly
demonstrate how the proposal meets all six of the Decisional Criteria.
Please be advised that the site plan submitted on November 30,2004,indicates that an extensive area of Native
Growth Protection Easement is involved in the proposed vegetation control application.The identified regulatory
mechanism for permitting temporary encroachment into environmentally sensitive area setbacks for vegetation
and view control is intended for minor ve etation control projects. Upon receipt of the required planimetric map
identifying_the extent of the proposed vegetation control an enoting each affected tree and proposed action,the
City will detenmme whether your proposal meets the intent olthe temQoraci.encroachmentjgulation. If the
proposal exceeds`the scope oi''a minor vegetation control project,the applicant will be required
e uird to either Modify
tfie io s for wi-gi-iw the a p1ication.— ...__...__. .� q fy
For your information,the vegetation control plan for a temporary encroachment into an environmentally sensitive
area setback may be required to be reviewed by the City's environmental consultant in order to confirm that the
proposal meets the identified decisional criteria.Third party review is conducted on a cost recovery basis. The
•scope and scale of the proposal will determine the need for third party review.
If you have any questions regarding this letter,please feel free to contact me at 253-835-2644.
Sincerely,
e Gamble
Associate Planner
enc: July 31, 1997 memorandum from Gregory Moore,Director of Community Development
04-104823
Doc I.29784
r
• vale'4' '- i8e . ...po..............+'..=mmets. ...e
• \
A _..•...
"1 LOT I 1 LOT 2
. •\14 al ' *Mt a r ' t,"17--
.
a t6
.=.=,
jok-s*.• ***AL • _11*gt.r
*'_"*„.• Ik '''''
....-t-•7:4--4:S‘i—St•v",--i-
- . . cc;z 74,.."7,7•T-,'PT;7.1•71' *-•
mX1.
.....Li• i..\
I
- .. A C *LAT •,
r•A A.At'
. 1 ..••• •4.--. •
_ ,... •
1 \ .
•
1 ,•....ri
L • --e
4-.
--,....
.,
, , . .
-
.. v
. '.. • •,•
...,.
,„
.
I, . ......_. -
1-7,-,7 ..1.:*‘\ • t k
. •
i-Immili.&14 -..
1 _
. - .1 •
• . .
....
1.-.,
i i .....______...„...
.:-...--
- . A _ i•1•••••11•10• P••Si
Altsihi , j V•sitis.„., .. 1111114t.
. , . ir D F.:
• t .
•
It
t
1 ...d. ...7 t.: . t
\
• .0, ,. 1.
.i. 1.• _ *. r• ti
SireverViaLet‘ ii 'n" -PAM I"
..-44196/POltd•Wassvr • it
• - AdPatif#PAIVP ..,-•• ...ST
I, • ••
rr '.it
- i 1. .
BUENNA SPRINGS EAST LOT 35 •
'MM. **EA..To.tofi
1114401 R . FT
,• *
MulliMI YAW .
., •
i..r17. 4p.
- -
tria--cotww men Mir 411... ..umnit . • —
C:F R 2 4 2005
orry OF FEDERAL WAY
=Areas with trees affected by proposal BUILDING DEPI
RBOA
TREE CONSERRSCVN
ATION CO.,INC.
31813 44TH AVE. S. •AUBURN, WA 98001 • www.arborscan.com
King Co.: (253) 735-5290 • Pierce Co.: (253) 535-0037• FAX: (253) 735-8864 • Lic#:ARBORTC014Q5
RECEIVED
February 23, 2005
FFR 2 4 2005
Mr. Dean Michelson
Redondo Bay Homeowner's Assn. ?. q` F E Rai WAY
324 SW 295th Pl. ,ai� iNC DEPT.
Federal Way, Wa. 98023
Re: Vegetation Management Plan
Dear Mr. Michelson,
I visited the green space buffer strips throughout your association's property on
Wednesday,the 9th of February. The purpose of my visit was to examine these buffer
areas and the trees within them to assist in developing a management plan. This plan
should allow the maintenance of the vegetative cover,wildlife habitat and water quality
while helping to reclaim some of the view corridors that were present when the homes
were built.
Though largely stocked now with native species such as red alder and Bigleaf maple,
several non-native and invasive species are now common, such as Himalayan blackberry,
English ivy and holly. All of the deciduous trees within the area of concern either grew
from seed after the property was cleared(alder and maple)or from the stumps of trees
felled during initial site preparation(maple).
The density of these pioneer saplings and sprouts make it impractical to individually
identify them on a survey or map,but the location of all trees within an area contained
between the homes and along the stream banks makes them easy to find. There are no
significant trees in the proposed vegetation management area. All alders and maples
within the cutting area are 11"in diameter or less.
VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
The scope of work on this project is the cutting of approximately 1/3 of the 210 alder
saplings in the drainage system identified on the accompanying map. In addition,up to V2
of the maple sprouts that are growing out of old stumps will be removed. There are too
many trees to individually identify on a map; the area shaded in green denotes the limits
of the cutting area. These trees are all volunteers; they were not planted nor planned,but
simply seeded this area as pioneer vegetation following the original clearing for home
construction. Since none of the trees have attained significant tree size,but yet are
reaching up into the view corridor, removal of the largest of these individuals will
accomplish several objectives. It will allow for better individual tree growth. Attaining a
ARBORSCAN
TREE CONSERVATION CO., INC.
31813 44TH AVE. S. •AUBURN, WA 98001 • www.arborscan.com
King Co.: (253) 735-5290 • Pierce Co.: (253) 535-0037• FAX: (253) 735-8864 • Licit: ARBORTC014Q5
spacing of at least 5 feet between trees will reduce competition and allow remaining
individuals to develop better stem growth. Dead and weak or failed trees can be removed
to further encourage remaining stems. This system allows for all of the attributes of an
NGPE to remain virtually unchanged by periodic `rotational thinning' of the tallest trees
without the unsightly and expensive topping programs which shorten tree life and
increase disease and decay problems. This system works extremely well with maples too,
as a)large maples growing out of old stumps tend to be higher risk trees,poorly attached
and crowded and,b)new shoots continually develop from the cut areas, keeping the
stumps and roots functional and with a diverse collection of stem sizes.
Plant material cut will be slashed and scattered on the ground; most trees have very little
material in the form of branches or brush, and will quickly decompose to add organic
material to the soil surface scarified during original clearing.
There will be no net loss to the function of the tree canopy from this activity. The trees in
question are not yet large enough to be considered a forest. The area of trees to be
trimmed is too small to affect the overall vegetative quality. Invasive non-native plants
such as blackberry have already reclaimed much of this area. Native plants in the cutting
area such as ferns,Indian plum, and salmonberry will not be damaged.
DECISIONAL CRITERIA
1) The saplings to be removed, 1 — 10"in diameter,have not been in place long enough
to have acquired much in the way of water quality improvement. The area of trees to
be removed is in the least sloped portion of the site. Remaining roots and tree stems,
combined with ample ground vegetation will continue to perform water retention and
erosion control purposes.
2) This is not a significant habitat area. Several potential nesting trees are on this site,
but are at least 300 feet from the cutting area.
3) This area appears to function adequately as a storm water drainage area. The removal
of a portion of these trees will not enhance or impede that function, as the remaining
trees will readily adapt to occupy any vacant air and root space.
4) The steep slope areas do not have trees to be cut,and, since this area is,by and large,
manmade, it is likely that the drainage was engineered so as to eliminate unstable
earth conditions.
5) There will be no detrimental affect to the City or any other property owners,as the
net result of this work will be virtually undetectable. Screening will be maintained
while enhancing scenic vistas.
6) Though this plan does not effectively return the view vista to nearly the level
present following the initial clearing operations or what the original homeowners
RB
lik
, .
TREEO CONSERVATION CO., INC. '
31813 44TH AVE. S. •AUBURN, WA 98001 • www.arborscan.com
King Co.: (253) 735-5290• Pierce Co.: (253) 535-0037 • FAX: (253)735-8864 • Lic#: ARBORTC014Q5
enjoyed and are still taxed upon, it does allow an improvement and the ability to
restrict the continued loss of those views.
Thank you once again for your interest in our firm,and please do not hesitate to call
should you have any further questions.
Respectfully submi d,
.,,z2,..iot
.%,if,
Bryce R. Landrud
ISA Certified Arborist#PN0232
DEPARTMENT OF COIV MUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Memorandum
TO: Planning Staff and Interpretation Notebook E GE R/F p
FROM: Gregory D. Moore, AICP 61\ °a 4 2005
Director of Community Development Services
Y jF. f=[D[_fRAL WAY
BG
DATE: July 31, 1997UI['DIN DEPT.
SUBJECT: Temporary Encroachment in Environmentally Sensitive Area Setback for
Vegetation Control and View Enhancement
•
Interpretation
Temporary intrusions within an environmentally sensitive area(ESA) buffer are not
specifically contemplated in the Federal Way City Code(FWCC). Traditionally, temporary
intrusions into environmentally sensitive area setbacks have been reviewed subject to the
underlying land use process identified for constructing structures or improvements within an
ESA setback area (Process IV).
Under certain circumstances such as temporary ESA setback encroachment for view
enhancement and minor vegetation control projects, an extensive review is not warranted and a
Process I (Administrative Review) is most appropriate unless the Director of Community
Development Services determines the nature of the project is so minor, that no formal review
process is required by the City. Process I review equals the process identified for minor
• improvements in wetland or stream setback areas (FWCC 22-1359(c) &22-1312(b)).
Discussion
The City has received an increasing number of inquiries regarding vegetation control and view
enhancement within environmentally sensitive area setbacks. Vegetation management projects
which are well designed and executed should result in minimal impact on the function and
quality of ESA setback areas when established guidelines are followed. Temporary vegetation
control projects in an ESA setback shall be reviewed through Process I review and subject to
minimum application requirements and decisional criteria listed below, unless the Director of
Community Development Services determines the nature of the project is so minor, that no
formal review process is required by the City.
1
-3 A /ti-1 t yl —t--. 'J
r ,�`^ -/-f%/`�- r K� r f rA— F e '
Minimum Application Requirements: t�
L ..' �k�
• Submit a completed master land use application.
• The application is subject to a Process I decision by the Director of Community
Development Services.
• . Process I review is subject to an hourly review fee.
• A vegetation control plan shall be developed by a certified arborist for tree
maintenance/control projects. For understory vegetation control projects, a
maintenance plan shall be developed by a qualified individual as determined by the
Director of Community Development Services. The vegetation control plan must show
how decisional criteria 1- 6 below are met and shall include the following information.
i A. A planimetric map at appropriate scale denoting all tree locations, type and
"- '` cal_ r_on the subject parcel.
<vv" . A\ --
v( v B Identify the extent of the proposed vegetation control, denoting each affected
i A -61 ( - tree and the proposed action.
- " C. No trees defined as significant in the FWCC shall be trimmed, unless the
trimming is to provide a benefit to the tree's health, due to an-existing damaged
or dangerous condition
na `: D. As a result of the completed project no net loss to the function of the tree
canopy shall occur on the site. Elevation and planimetric views of the existing
tree canopy and proposed tree canopy shall be provided for review purposes.
E. Identify methods of vegetation control, equipment used, and discuss how the
. 1-0. ' debris will or will not be removed from the site.
F. The plan shall include a long term vegetation control/maintenance strategy if
( • ) r •proposed. , T
J A{ r A C^ , ..- �,- ,
(. ' Decisional Criteria: ?
The vegetation control plan shall demonstrate how the proposal meets each of the following
criteria. '
--
•
r.AA-Et 3, �'i C3Dt (.1) 'It will not adversely affect water quality.
r c;'C2—° ' (2) It will not destroy nor damage a significant habitat area.
---- (3) It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities.
(4) It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards.
J It will not be materially detrimental to any other property nor to the city as a whole,
including the loss of significant open space or scenic vista. .
(6) It is necessary to maintain a pre-existing scenic vista or view corridor, or is necessary
to minimize potential impacts from dead, dying, diseased, or otherwise dangerous or
invasive non-native vegetation.
_ -7 ,—t--1 t/J�
• S_ k\misc\in erp.esa ��);-.� r j .fl. �, ;��,� �'
I ' ',Z�..f w--f' J r hJ r, I (\ (_L t } - 7
_ ,,
_. 'r' r I ,1 5- J \.) —1�,-'J
ARBORSCAN
TREE CONSERVATION CO., INC.
: .
• 31813 44TH AVE. S. •AUBURN, WA 98001 • www.arborscan.corn
King Co.: (253) 735-5290• Pierce Co.: (253) 535-0037 • FAX: (253)735-8864• Lic#: ARBORTC014Q5
`iL1. i;/ J Lam'
April 11,2005
%�t,/, r' t,r i 2t�t05
Mr. Dean Michelson � a�
Redondo Bay Homeowner's Assn.
324 SW 295th Pl. Permit' AL
wither: O�( 23— vF'
Federal Way, Wa. 98023 By'
��
Re: Vegetation Management Plan Comments:
Dear Mr. Michelson,
I visited the green space buffer strips throughout your association's property on
Wednesday,the 9th of February. The purpose of my visit was to examine these buffer
areas and the trees within them to assist in developing a management plan. This plan
should allow the maintenance of the vegetative cover, wildlife habitat and water quality
while helping to reclaim some of the view corridors that were present when the homes
were built.
Though largely stocked now with native species such as red alder and Bigleaf maple,
several non-native and invasive species are now common, such as Himalayan blackberry,
English ivy and holly. All of the deciduous trees within the area of concern either grew
from seed after the property was cleared(alder and maple) or from the stumps of trees
felled during initial site preparation(maple).
The density of these pioneer saplings and sprouts make it impractical to individually
identify them on a survey or map,but the location of all trees within an area contained
between the homes and along the stream banks makes them easy to find. There are no
significant trees in the proposed vegetation management area. All alders and maples
within the trimming area are 11" in diameter or less.
VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
The scope of work on this project is the trimming of approximately 1/2 of the 210 alder
saplings in the drainage system identified on the accompanying map. In addition, up to '/z
of the maple sprouts that are growing out of old stumps will be trimmed. There are too
many trees to individually identify on a map; the area shaded in green denotes the limits
of the management area. These trees are all volunteers; they were not planted nor
planned,but simply seeded this area as pioneer vegetation following the original clearing
for home construction. Since none of the trees have attained significant tree size,but yet
are reaching up into the view corridor,trimming off of the upper portions of these
individuals will accomplish several objectives. It will allow for better individual tree
ARBORSCAN
TREE CONSERVATION CO., INC.
•
•
• 31813 44TH AVE. S. •AUBURN, WA 98001 • www.arborscan.com
King Co.: (253) 735-5290 • Pierce Co.: (253) 535-0037 • FAX: (253) 735-8864 • Lic#: ARBORTC014Q5
growth. Removing some of the top growth of the larger individuals will allow more light
through to the smaller trees and allow them to develop better stem growth. This system
allows for all of the attributes of an NGPE to remain virtually unchanged by periodic
`rotational trimming' of the tallest trees. This system works extremely well with maples
too, as a) large maples growing out of old stumps tend to be higher risk trees,poorly
attached and crowded and,b)new shoots continually develop from the cut areas,keeping
the stumps and roots functional and with a diverse collection of stem sizes.
Removal of the non-native trees, shrubs and vines may accompany the trimming program
to help reduce the impact of these invasive species on the native growth easement.
Plant material cut will be slashed and scattered on the ground; most trees have very little
material in the form of branches or brush, and will quickly decompose to add organic
material to the soil surface scarified during original clearing.
There will be no net loss to the function of the tree canopy from this activity. The trees in
question are not yet large enough to be considered a forest. The area of trees to be
trimmed is too small to affect the overall vegetative quality. Invasive non-native plants
such as blackberry have already reclaimed much of this area. Native plants in the cutting
area such as ferns, Indian plum,and salmonberry will not be damaged.
DECISIONAL CRITERIA
1) The saplings to be trimmed, 1 — 10" in diameter,have not been in place long enough
to have acquired much in the way of water quality improvement. The area of trees to
be trimmed is in the least sloped portion of the site. Remaining roots and tree stems,
combined with ample ground vegetation will continue to perform water retention and
erosion control purposes.
2) This is not a significant habitat area. Several potential nesting trees are on this site,
but are at least 300 feet from the cutting area.
3) This area appears to function adequately as a storm water drainage area. The
reduction of the overall height of the largest of these trees will not enhance or impede
that function, as the remaining trees will readily adapt to occupy any vacant air and
root space.
4) The steep slope areas do not have trees to be cut, and, since this area is,by and large,
manmade, it is likely that the drainage was engineered so as to eliminate unstable
earth conditions.
5) There will be no detrimental affect to the City or any other property owners, as the
net result of this work will be virtually undetectable. Screening will be maintained
while enhancing scenic vistas.
RBORSCAN
TREE CONSERVATION CO.,INC.
• 31813 44TH AVE. S. •AUBURN, WA 98001 • www.arborscan.com
King Co.: (253) 735-5290 • Pierce Co.: (253) 535-0037 • FAX: (253)735-8864 • Lic#:ARBORTC014Q5
6) Though this plan does not effectively return the view vista to nearly the level
present following the initial clearing operations or what the original homeowners
enjoyed and are still taxed upon, it does allow an improvement and the ability to
restrict the continued loss of those views.
Thank you once again for your interest in our firm,and please do not hesitate to call
should you have any further questions.
Respectfully submitted,
Bryce . drud hP 1 ` 2005
ISA Certified Arborist#PN0232
....er"'4,».- R.1[ .— ' k
. 4 `
LOT ! t LOT 2 + ., \\
•Ias so sss+ s► • ,?‘$1-
8- 1
■ 1
•,..:•us yen, 14si\
MAte.Ac,s_ r.
x.'---iiiitaiti"X;-7. \
V • -Ti y:
r TM.pr^ ='� =v
; jrr tm
A
- ■w1.w11is:„1 -- _
' r �, r . •
N
_ :. , Y
{ siiiiii 1 Sftt PLAN APPROVAL
V' Permit Number: ( f - /0`{ V 2:3 - ( P
'N � . Approved By:� 2� /R
4
Date: �� "Lt a/oS
. 1 '.0"II
•
Nt\ /W", I
110
. ,�.4 ):143 t '
1
' 'N'�
r Lo r ° - r
} tv^ tsso] s'
t t� ti
i k• 3
... . t
44 r
il
Ltd Al4rr i _ray S.
I f•,- •..r
f'1 R
BUENNA SPRINGS EAST 4 LO: 3s t''
TOTFt toe.••4.lot Magi A •0445 TA
a NRH+Y saw.
,•
M..Y
oft
r ♦�..M
2 4 2005
=Areas with trees affected by proposal
i[Y Oi i EDEIihL VVAY
i;l)ILDING DEPT