Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
07-101881
Puwidc Works Department 33325 8,h Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Fed e ra I Way 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS KAU PACFIC RETAIL 07- 101881 -CN 317 17 pa„ k.147, S og /OY 1 078 Prepared by Maryanne Zukowski PE, and Soma Chattopadhyay City of Federal Way Public Works Traffic Division ttlE QJPO�W '��cA c On .4324,9 4 41 is Gft ONALV- FEZIPIMAFAM [Maryanne Zukowski,P.E.] Transportation Concurrency Analysis _. Page I 04/30/2007 Introduction This analysis studies the transportation capacity impacts for the proposed Pacific Retail in Federal Way, Washington. The study focuses on evening peak hour traffic operations at all intersections monitored for transportation concurrency impacted by at least one(1) new evening peak hour trip. All other transportation impacts are addressed by other applicable development review processes. The analysis was conducted for 2009, the anticipated year of opening of the development proposal for conditions with and without the project. Purpose and Objectives This study has been performed on behalf of the project applicant by the City of Federal Way, Public Works Department, Traffic Services Division, and is consistent with the City of Federal Way Transportation Concurrency Management code as described in Federal Way City Code Chapter 19, Article IV. The purpose of this code is to implement the transportation concurrency requirements of the Growth Management Act, RCW 36A.70.070(6)(e), consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and WAC 365-195-510 and 365-195-835. These requirements apply to all new development and expansions of existing development and specify that the City may not permit development if adequate capacity in the transportation system cannot be provided to the development concurrent with the development. Adequate capacity is deemed to be provided if the City's adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard is met. The City's adopted LOS standard is contained in Comprehensive Plan TP 16 and is summarized in the table below: Table 1 - Level of Service Thresholds Impact Parameter Threshold Minimum Signalized Intersection E Level of Service Unsignalized Intersection None Maximum Volume/Capacity Ratio (Xc) 1.00 Project Location and Descriq. on The proposed development is located at:Pavilion Ceiltre Behind KFC, west of SR 99 and south of S 316`h St., parcel No. 082104 07&.A Vifiligiy map`is shown in Figure 1 below with a site plan shown in Figure 2:. The exttting'lan e- n the site is a paved parking area. The total parcel is existing shopping center retail.. The loposedproject would consist of 3,532 square feet of new specialty retail located centrally on the tx 2 Figure 1: Vicinity Map PACIFIC RETAIL c SITE it III 308TH ST.SW y 9111 � 316iHSISW 141 r JI-5 i VICINITY MAP N Figure 2: Site Plan 1 1 ——— ..o.�........oK I- I I MIME y 3,532 SF PROPOSEI BUILCDINC —" r iI I - - Woziovu.o pangs- - _ _ _ - _ F - 014,. ffik -- : o � ® I I I �/ I ink CEP 9-:t. , I ' o ° (� Elk CD v m 1 1 t-;-j/ O 4010 la 1.* AM arn iiimliwiiiiiimismo 0 sui i I it ii r.�SITE PLAN """ C� •.w-e- 3 Traffic forecasts for year 2009 conditions without the project are presented in this section; representing the anticipated year of opening for the project. In addition, all projects shown on the City's currently adopted Transportation Improvement Plan are assumed to be constructed, consistent with the Growth Management Act's definition of"concurrent with development". The 2009 evening peak hour future volume for each study intersection was derived by applying a 2% annual growth rate to the latest available volumes, and adding trips reserved for approved development projects. The Background volumes are illustrated in Figure 3a, 3b, and 3c.. Figure 3a: Pacific Highway North of S 310'h St 2009 Background Volumes q i N i_ 116 � � g z t T io00 co ''a -, 3fD1S ti 1 r r a' 1 i t�",r4o S3 chi F S*St Ft $ 'B Co 7-4 k �x r aQ 66 S 3084 r� ' 4., 2S310St 4 IN co `+ t _ r la d . 4 213 ~4 '• r52 S 31 fin m Lr `, '4'I-1.`I 4 ��MJ S ,n X E t g 72 d �I, 2 St _a 1M1I <., �74 run S 312 St -0 ' za r 1 3 ! N 2n-, Y• H 2 co ,�51 8�g8 ut c7 t58 ffS314St ,44-1 o oo tiz ara ia it .B rry I co ,r1 l�` • S 316 St S�R'Y I-t18 •a• n —� � I • 147774 4r +r r o `L no 2 / 49 , 119� IF 0 0 ice' n R .1. • 317 S 1 "'� a'm?i . S 31? zs �� �� 4di it 'i fm? 6'� F ~, 4 1460 ,��� ,4�sG 4-990 n m #- 4•2 } �7 , "`�.3 k �= 4-2033 t- ^,' 329 ` S t-Bs ill S 320 St �' `�'' ��+J3J2 t��-99g szr E. : 1 4 C 3 rJ "ro 4 r"55 'Ai,.0 c. 25M1ti 7'40 1 1.4 45 f" 243,r °51"_ 1 cj( 1 ° � a t 70 - , fir, _ .1 ¢ S 322£St:,,d4 4-' a d I fiW'I $-250 F. 4- - :rifer S324 St d 441 1r1- ' /z2 9 1\ V sT4'\.____ ---77"--- ' 2/)"/ St y Q \„...---i A /1--__ Sr Figure 36: Pacific Highway south of S 310th St and S 320th St vicinity 2009 Background Volumes 5 11t , -- jm 3 l 1 312 St 1L ' j1 S 312 St r29.1\ !« Jr +o 41 4e rm mo ,o b �� t e. s �-. A o r t T----- _ (--. co co _ — I ' 3 \,______ 1 74 2 t rr 14 1 1 J o k� Y3e E t1yN ,2=. s^ 598 SW3204 „= .M 41 3 41 se t to S 320S1 may'' 4 1 _ { r, , ... 1411 ..- �.- a -4 Ml ._n I 817-+ n inn •�ta a �/ a m a 17 4325. ., '.i-x 12 28 St. gli :-^ L ::. 3 as y v I a 4, . 27 { 3 7 i-417 ^•I' 42 �6 14 4. 18 ' 330 Stl'"• .' S 330 St x -S 1 �F 0 40 t 17 g� b I i1 _ ll614r.T Figure 3c: S 320th St vicinity west of SR 99 2009 Background Volumes Site Generated Traffic Evening peak hour trips generated by the proposed project were forecast. The forecast considered pass-by trips if available. The evening peak hour trips were then distributed and assigned to the adjacent roadways and intersection within the study area using the City's latest transportation model. No reduction in vehicle trips was made to account for a potential shift away from the automobile. ITE trip rates are based on observed vehicle trip patterns at each land use and thereby account for a basic amount of non-auto travel. 6 Trip Generation No existing land use currently occupies the proposed area for the project. The proposed development consists of specialty retail within an existing retail shopping center, where parking areas will be removed. Trips generated by the project were forecast using trip generation rates found in the 7th Edition of Trip Generation (ITE, 2003). Land Use Code 814 was used to calculate the trip generation. Procedures outlined in ITE's Trip Generation Handbook were used to determine when to use rates or regression equations and calculating weighted averages between different independent variables. The project is forecast to generate a total of(10) evening peak hour trips. Table 2 below summarizes the trips generation for the proposed development. Table 2. Evening Peak Hour Trip Generation Land Use Size Entering Trips Exiting Trips Total Trips Existing Uses None N/A N/A N/A N/A Proposed Uses Specialty Retail 3,521 sf 4 6 10 Pass-By Reduction 0 0 0 0 Net New Trips J 4 6 10 Notes: *Sources: Trip Generation(ITE,7th Edition,2003), land use code 814 Trip Generation(ITE,5th Edition, 1991). Trip Generation Handbook(ITE,2nd Edition,2001) Trip Distribution and Assignment The evening peak hour trips generated by the proposed project were distributed and assigned to the roadway system as shown in Figure 4. The distribution is based on the City's travel demand model, taking into account surrounding land uses and existing traffic patterns. 7 r to 0 0 .. 7 oe T- « e0 00 00 0 0 0 0 J O 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 O - - 0 O 0 Di 0 ao 00 00 oe 4 00 do 00 00 O 0- - 0 on o O �e o 0 0 0 O o 0 0)°: ee0oI = 2 1 I 1 i on?' . f 1 1, 00 00 0 00 Jo o. u o ° 00 0 0 n an D 00 '1r 0 010 .) ____, Q ----, L________ Figure 4 - Evening Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment Horizon Year Traffic Forecast The evening peak hour traffic generated by the proposed project was added to the background forecasts in Figure 3a, 3b, 3c. The Horizon Year volumes are illustrated in Figure 5a, 5b, and 5c below. 8 Figure 5a: Pacific Highway North of S 310th St 2009 Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with the Project t-Th \ P eA g_itiogillille ,9 raa-. r , .. -,„ • 1-1 R. 0' 112S�01S f T - I J. N cr 0 / ----. / (/) e-171 S3 4$, 16,-31316 S3 az-> 4p � is� J Mos o� 3 rtt S 308 Sty �� Fn r28 �'} 'ends " - ,n^N %,c 22S310St ii 1 - g Ow, �n _m �55 L2e }3 Il 41'42 S312$t j,� 114t_�r�j{ssj�1 ��0 S q`7119 H� .F tY0? 4 4 2471 1 ;;_77 p° t f 1 r S 312 St I '�^ , iii13 2�' - --. ea-, my lS Y. (1/4,\ 1n J 1 L 'se S 314 St"'+� a a 101ii 4-0 2 c Rosst a, —112 T eo l 4-4 in Y 1 .)I VI eue S 316 SI 11 �7 w .' I 1�jnTr 771 5.+ 41317 t role. l 1I a,iw °l -� '� W. .O 5317- 4 et 0.1) 1:, 7 L i N-Zse ggp ao 1R ° 1 1 rt�+s1 ��4' 1 1 �°3 p �° 1-2034 N N S rae '` s t r 1528 w N S 320 Si N fio It m a . ��r1n �,� a20e 237 1 �+ y 2681 . see-1 Awn 120561 - 73ti '' j /// f. .113-4 -A� 2S-y - n -0 ti Ir 1 a) S 322 SlQ Y ro a' o-P cda t160 " dS 1 iv 2e.1 rise 5 321 St _ �....... i 1_2/ Til co N S328S l 0 x ro J �Jy s 330 St iitj I cap $,ro S $332 5t g? J i , _____., r �S 1 a J 1 �15 S 333 St cn 03 E. ay; 4 icC ti �. CO 07 �_ y ftr O N �P23 G f 11r10� S71FG1L4'�fe1 f �1 S336St o}` 3 5 '1 Le iH 1147-1 4274 $ e�-1 '� Figure 5b: Pacific Highway south of S 310 St and S 320`h St vicinity 2009 Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with the Project 10 c ; 3123 - _ rail $312a 1 +Ae' aa; 1173-111. r X al r if , • . �' vss --� M9 1 �? :.. ...s.......i_1.......) Intl 40 r g 7 to A Tic!, Figure 5c: S 320th St vicinity west of SR 99 2008 Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with the Project Traffic Analysis The quality of traffic flow at the key study intersections is presented in this section of the report. Table 3 shows a summary of the LOS analysis for the study intersections. Where a performance measure does not apply to the entire intersection,the table shows the measure for the worst movement of the intersection. Calculations are shown in Appendix A for Background Conditions and Appendix B for Horizon Year conditions. 11 Table 3 -LOS Summary Worksheet Table 3 - Concurrency Test Result Summary Worksheet Project Name: Pacific Retail Project File No. 07-101881- CN PW Traffic Staff: Maryanne Zukowski, P.E. Date: 4/30/07 Intersec oil`` SAS 1 With- LOS w . Signalized Background Project ' Conditions Standa Conditions Standard Project Intersection rd ID North-South East-West LOS V/C Met? LOS V/C Met? Contribution Street AIM Stree 2051 Pacific Hwy_S S_304St B j 0.6 Y B _ 0.6 Y Y Y 2250;Pacific Hwy_S TS 308 St B ; 0.56 ; Y B ; 0.56 ; Y Y Y 2350 Pacific Hwy S j S 310 St A * 0.31 Y A 0.31 Y Y N '2550;Pacific Hwy SIS 312 St D 10.82 Y D ! 0.82 Y Y Y 2750Pacific Hwy. S IS 316 St B __0.62 Y B 0.62 Y Y 3025126 Av SW ;SW 320 St A ; 0.39 Y A 0.39 Y Y 3028;21 Av SW ;SW 320 St D ; 0.86 Y D 4 0.86 Y Y Y '303114 Wy SW _ISW 320 St B 0.64 Y B 4 0.64 Y N 30321.13 P1 SW :SW 320 St B 10.49 9 Y B 0.49 Y N 3033 Ell P1 SW lSW 320 St B : 0.47 Y B 0.47 ' Y N 3034 110 P1 SW lSW 320 St C 1 0.97 Y C : 0.97 Y N 3036 7 Av SW jSW 320 St B ; 0.58 Y B 0.58 Y N 303716 PI SW jSW 320 St 1,613 I Y B L 0.49 I Y N 3040 i 1 Av S iS 320 St C 10.76 Y C 0.76 Y Y Y 3043:5 Av S IS 320 St 111111 0.42 i Y B 4-0.42 Y Y N 3046 i8 Av S .IS 320 St C i 0.67 i Y C 0.67 i Y Y Y 3047 i 10 Av S IS 320 St Al0.33 Y 0.33 Y Y N 3048�11 Pl S 1S 320 St D -+ 0.77 + Y D 1_0.77 Y Y Y 3050 Pacific Hwy S 41S 320 St C 10.79 Y C 0.79 - Y Y 3052120 Av S IS 320 St C i 0.65 Y C i 0.65 Y Y Y 3053 21 P1 S 1S 320 St 0.26 Y MR 0.37 Y N 3055 23 Av S S 320 St D ; 0.88 Y D _j 0.88 Y Y 3056[Gateway Blvd 'S 320 St B f 0.85 Y B f 0.85 r Y Y IS i 3057 I-5 SB Ramp ; S 320 St C }_0.72_- Y C f 0.73 [ Y _ Y 3058 5-5 NB Ramp IS 320 St B ; 0.68_;___Y B ' 0.68 i Y Y 3060 f 32 Av S 1S 320 St B 10.57 f Y B 10.57 f Y Y 12 3061 [Weyerhaeuser =S 320 St B 10.69 Y B 0.69 Y Y ;Wy S i 3350;Pacific Hwy S IS 324 St C i 0.78 i Y C i 0.78 ` Y Y 3550 Pacific Hwy S .S 328 St s 0.45 L Y B 0.45 't Y N 3650 Pacific Hw S iS 330 St B 0.49 Y B 0.49 Y — Y 3750Pacific HwyS sS 332 St A 0.01 Y A L 0.44 L Y N 3850tPacific Hwy S _IS 333 St ` µ.A. 0.65 Y D 10.65 Y N _ 4050 Pacific Hwy S S 336 St C 0.81 Y c [ 0.81 [ Y Pro-rata Share Traffic Mitigation The City requires all new development projects impacting projects listed in the City's currently adopted Transportation Improvement Plan(TIP)to either construct the impacted projects or provide pro-rata share contributions towards these projects. The pro-rata contribution for each TIP project is calculated as the number of new peak hour trips generated by the development divided by the estimated total peak hour traffic volume at the time that phase of the development is completed. If a TIP project has been deemed to be fully funded by the Public Works Director, the pro-rata share will be calculated based on the design engineer's current cost estimate subtracting funding from federal and state grants. If frontage improvements are also provided on a TIP project, the cost of the frontage improvements provided by the development would be subtracted from the cost of the TIP project before calculating pro-rata share of mitigation for off-site improvements. If the development's impacts on a TIP project vary within the TIP project, depending on the operational or safety issue the TIP project is intended to resolve,pro-rata shares may be calculated separately for each segment that is impacted differently by dividing the cost of the TIP project on a per-lineal-foot basis. Based on the estimated trip generation and distribution of the project traffic, the project would impact seven 2007—2012 TIP projects by one or more trips during the weekday evening peak hour. In order to mitigate the impacts of the new trips generated by the project and meeting the LOS standards, the applicant shall: 1. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, construct the TIP projects identified in Table 3; or 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, voluntarily pay the project's pro-rata share contribution in the amount of$27,203 less 10% (staff reduction for assumed internal capture rates) for a total amount of$24,483.00. The pro-rata share calculations are shown in Appendix C. No level of service(LOS) deficiencies were noted outside of locations where programmed improvements would be constructed. Therefore, no supplemental offsite mitigation is necessary. 13 • Summary and Conclusions • The proposed development would replace parking area and no existing land use and would consist of 3,532 SF of Specialty Retail. • The proposed development is forecast to generate 10 new evening peak hour trips, a 10% credit is given for internal capture. Therefore the application fee is for a project less than 10 PM Peak Hour Trips. All intersections impacted by one or more evening peak hour trips from the proposed development would meet City of Federal Way LOS standards with programmed improvements, thus the transportation system provides adequate capacity concurrent with the development. ■ The proposed development will either construct all TIP projects impacting by one or more trips or voluntarily contribute $24,483.00 in pro-rata share contributions. L:\DEPT\PW\TRA\Concuirency\0710188I_Pecific Retail\draft Concurrency Analysis Repoit_Pacific Retail.doc 14 APPENDIX A HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2051: S 304 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/27/2007 J --4" 1-- 4-- k 4\ I* t \*' 1, 4/ m4�,,: �31,',i , _.. .._ . _. > . _ . r , .BBL BOB SSBR �, v w =:�l4f -Vtl` � �.��.�__3<: ;. NBT. luBFt Lane Configurations 4 r 4, , +f t+ tt'F, Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -4% 5% -1 To 2% Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 F pb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 `' :y. Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 ; 0.98 1.00 0.99 , "°': Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 1859 1532 1688 1778. 4972 1752 4954 :='fj Flt Permitted 0.84 1.00 0.78 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1596 1532 1349 1778 4972 1752 4954 Volume (vph) 26 42 38 171 53 59 43 1084 134 52 1481 58 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,4__OO Adj. Flow (vph) 26 42 38 171 53 59 43 1084 134 52 1481 58 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 29 0 9 41,04 0 9 0 0 3 .0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 68 9 0 274 0 43 1209 0 52 1536 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 ` 2 'C ' 10 10 10 *,,10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 6 6 0 2 0 2 0 0 6 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.9 28.9 28.9 9.0 70.2 6.9 68.1 Effective Green, g (s) 27.9 27.9 27.9 9.0 70.2 6.9 68.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.59 0.06 0.57 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0,:- .4~ Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 371 356 314. 133 2909 101, 2811 :e v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.24 0.03 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm o,.., 0.04 0.01 44,54:.c0.20 ,i 0, �, _ = r _0. v/c Ratio 0.18 0.02 0.87 .32 0.4-2 0.51 .55 Uniform Delay, d1 *1. 36.9 35.5 44.3 52.6 13.7 54.9 16.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.48 0.18 1.49 0.26 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 ; 21.7 0.5 0_4 1.7 0.7 ', �`- Delay (s) 37.0 35.6 63.7 25.9 2.9 83.7 4.9 Level of Service ,° , D D E u,,. ,};; C A :,,.,.4.,,,,,, ,-,:, F A . < Approach Delay (s) 36.5 63.7 3.7 7.5 Approach LOS ; �.t' D .>. . - _ E , xi ,,' , A i. - A tt.tal-2Fa�Y� t-. n._,1r'3. _ .x..,,.., ,cast ,..,...,.,..,.M..�:cv'a..� s,_.e.,..x„.w.�.i:.< ..•..ua..a .. zSJes,.a _ .r E �3. ,� :....�c'>i�. .t m m+ro� •. HCM Average Control Delay 11.9; HCM.Level.of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 ' Sum of lost time(s) 1 �� Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service D � � Analysis Period(mi�� a-= .� � 15 A _, . _ .x-o `� , c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection ( acity Analysis 2250: S 308 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/27/2007 M .gai., � "'! • ► BT. WBR N6L <:NBT ;�NBR.;. SBL: SBT1-4401.1 Lane Configurations 4 4 +ft* � T+1 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1;900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 2% 1% -1% Total Lost time(s), 4. 5.0 5,-, 5.0- 5.0 5.0 =; 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 41 Ti.i:'; 0.99 , ,',T. 0.98 ° = -1.00 1.00 $ ;?; 1.00 1.00 Fipb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.95 0.92 .; 1.00 1.00 .{:,, 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1666 r,-4,.` 1644 i-', 4761 5024 .1778 4974 Flt Permitted 0.70 0.87 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1200 1444 1761 5024. .* 1778 4974 Volume (vph) 98 21 66 28 17 66 55 1146 23 33 1568 131 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 98 21 66 28 17 66 55 'I 146 23 33 1568 131 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 52 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 165 0 0 59 0 55 1168 0 33 1694 0 Confl. Peds. (#lhr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 8 8 0 2 0 2 0 0 8 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot s Prot t Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 . , '.8 _ ... ; l 7'7: Actuated Green, G (s) 18.3 18.3 7.8 82.2 5.5 79.9 Effective Green, s g"O ;,. _.. l 17.3 T�. .: _... .. < 17.3 t 7.8 82.2 ;:-. 5.5 79.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.69 0.05 0.67 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0" 5.0 5.0 Via` 5.0 5.0- Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) :: ,ix 173 14„45 208 114 3441 .j, 81 3312 i v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.23 0.02 c0.34 v/s Ratio Perm K , c0.14 , r ;4 41,04 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.28 0.48 0.34 0.41 0.51 Uniform d1 Delay, �' '.� m; Y �, . �. 51.0 � � �' S 8=s�; S4.2 `..7:8 � : - `$5.7 10 2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.10 0.83 0.86 0.14 Incremental Delay,d2 w -.54.6 ' 0.3-i 1.01a 0:2 --" 1.1 0.5 Delay(s) 105.6 46.1 60.6 6.7 48.9 1.9 Level of Service F _ �� � D,• E A Y x D A Approach Delay(s) 105.6 46.1 9.1 2.8 Approach'LOS F D- A • ' ik, . A - HCM Average Control Delay 12.5 HCM Level of Service ' .." .- "B ~= '' HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 :. ���; .77,111 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 . ' € .: *.'i', * r c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection .,apacity Analysis 2350: S 310 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 MO of z aB,.. ; fBT NE3, - ,ts :. Lane Configurations r ttl A ft+ Sign Control Stop. Free Brea ! t 4-iii41r Grade 0% 1% 0% Volume(veh/h) 0 74 1097 46 73 159 4 ..r 4 � ,..� � ,';' '- Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate`(vph) 4. 74 1097 46 73: ,< , � trk-.,:--.. Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12,0 12.0 !,.1 ; � . ��'' 'F Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent:Blockage 1 1 �. ....a _. . ,,... x Right turn flare (veh) Median type None .. . ,.. a... .. ,. ..�� ,. ,.3 „3: Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 660 ' :, . pX, platoon unblocked 0.90 0.88 0.88 vC,conflicting volume 1818 , 409 11 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2;-'stage;2 conf:vol ,. . ' ,k- .� --. q. .. ,-, k ;:4,f , :, , vCu, unblocked vol 1106 64 907 tC single(s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 : x 4-_: V zi '� n x,r.; tC, 2 stage (s) tP(s) 3:5 3:3 2.2 „ 4 ;O:, � i'64 p0 queue free % 100 91 89 cM capacity(Y0,110) : 162 857 Va'ri a Total 74"., 439 439` 265 73 = ; ',,, 7 -7 MZ - Volume Left 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 p � �...� _ Volume Righ .. v - cSH 857 1700 1700 1700 653 1700 1700 1700 Volume to 1 • 6• 0:26 0.16 011 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 s � Controf,DeTa0 At 0.0 0.0 11 2t- 4 ,..„,,,-.,,,,,.;',1,,_ Lane LOS A B Approach Delay t $ , 0 5 ' T t t` F Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.5 Intersectionn CapacityUtilzatl • _ Analysis Period (min) 15 � .:4., ,i .. a. :,«: '.„ ,��: .. - ` t '^e-... e 9 c,,. r" r..�*vx.. # ,, ' -.,'..Vie i- ,: . Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 . HCM Signalized Intersection ( lcity Analysis 2550: S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/27/2007 t` -+► C ' ' t /* \* l 4/ EBL: ;,EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR ° NBL NBT ;.NBR SBL SBT SBF Lane Configurations ) ti+ ) TI Tti ttt r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 , a�. 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, pedlbtkes ; _, 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , ,: 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Sate __ f prot) 1747 3373 1741 3416 1741 4966 1755 5058 1497 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd."Flow(perm) 1747 3373 1741 3416 1741 4966 1755 5058 1497 Volume (vph) 250 356 100 147 425 77 329 800 99 167 1061 270 Peakfactor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 250 356 100 147 425 77 329 800 99 167 1061 270 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 13 0 0 12 0 0 0 186 Lane Group Flow(vph) 250 434 0 147 489 0 329 887 0 167 1061 84 Confl.Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 Turn Type, ; ,;Prot Prat Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Mtn - 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.9 26.0 13.5 20.6 25.0 43.5 19.0 37.5 37.5 Effecjif n,.g(s) ' °'17.9 25.0 ., 12.5 19.6.Id it 25.0 43.5 Itiaf-19.0 37.5 37.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.21 0.10 0.16 0.21 0.36 0.16 0.31 0.31 Clearance=Time(s) W.;4.0 4.0 - ,,, 4.0 4.0= =, 5.0 5.0 : : 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 261 703 181 558, = u. 363 1800 -: 278 1581 468 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.13 0.08 c0.14 c0.19 0.18 0.10 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm : 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.62 0.81 0.88 0.91 0.49 0.60 0.67 0.18 Unif Del j�`' '50.7 43 .' k.�_ ,;52.6 49.0 -,-, ' 46.4 29.7 ,� n ° '47.0 35.9 30.1, Progression Factor 1.06 0.68 1.03 0.80 0.61 0.65 1.07 1.08 2.72 Incrent tef-Delay,d2 **42.9 1.1 22.2 14.0= 22.5 0.9 . :7_,.; 2.2 2.0 0.7 Delay(s) 96.5 30.5 76.3 53.0 50.6 20.0 52.7 40.7 82.4 Level of Service F '`� E D D C �s D D F Approach Delay (s) 53.9 58.3 28.2 49.5 Ap k. z.4-_.... .' C D HCM Ave. Control Delay 45.3 HCM Level of Service _ , , s fib y �`v HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuatedcle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) " � � Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 t ��k ,N` c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/27/2007 j c 4--- I* \*1 t 4/ Molvsrr>Ititt '{. #.'. :EBL EBT EBR°• W01-- WBT WBR '. NBL >..NBT,•;'-NDR .: SBL 1~ :R Lane Configurations "I 13. '1 1 fits, 1+4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) ,: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost times 5.0 5.0 . :; 5.0 5.0 ' r5.0 5.0 M.-; 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 p ' 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 ' , Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.92 ; 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.98 -'•-Wf. 1.00 0.99 , g Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prof) 1762 1707 . ,. . 1739 1677 , :.-- 1752 4883 1787 5052 !/ Flt Permitted 0.58 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1073 1707 414 1677 1752 4883 1787 5052 Volume (vph) 107 87 99 206 84 112 167 1125 193 107 1289 70 Peak-hour factor,.PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.010 Adj. Flow(vph) 107 87 99 206 84 112 167 1125 193 107 1289 70 RTOR Reduction(vph)' , 0 39 0 0 46 0 0 15 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 107 147 0 206 150 0 167 1303 0 107 1355 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 4 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4. ';;' 8 "': ., R : Actuated Green, G (s) 23.3 14.9 33.3 20.9 21.0 62.3 10.4 51.7 Effective Green, g(s) 21.3 13.9 32.3 19.9 : 21.0 62.3 10.4 51 ,-. -_: Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.12 0.27 0.17 0.18 0.52 0.09 0.43 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 'R Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 233 198 259 278 307 253 , 4,; ;-; 155 2177 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.09 c0.09 0.09 0.10 c0.27 0.06 c027 v/s Ratio Perm 0 05; ". . ., c0.13 _ . y,.- v/c Ratio 0.46 0.74 0.80 0.54 0.54 0.51 0.69 0.62 Uniform Delay, dl 43.2 51.3 , 37.1 45.9 - v_,. ,- 45.1 18.92 , F" ' 53.2 26 , Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.76 0.69 0.42 1.06 0.36 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 12.3 14.4 1.1 ,1 4,-;- 0.7 0.5 r 8.4 1> 1 Delay(s) 43.7 63.7 45.0 35.8 32.0 8.5 64.8 10.7 Level of Service D E D D Approach Delay(s) 56.4 40.5 11.2 14.7 Approach LOS �:.:.. �� D all. _'4"--; B ,._ ,-, 1 HCM Average Control Delay 19.4 ; HCM Level of Service B > , HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 * Sum of lost time(0 4: ..., _:.< = K.. Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 . HCM Signalized Intersection C city Analysis 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/27/2007 Movement f,, MM#" traEBL 'EST EBR WBL W T,:; 1W NBL NBT NBRk 5��.- R,L aR Lane Configurations ri 'Hi WI +++ r ,"i ++1 VI 44++ r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 , 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1 00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3522 5119 3433 5045 1536 3358 4831 44k'' 3426 5136 1522 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3522 5119 3433 5045 1536 3358 4831 3426 5136 1522 Volume (vph) 458 886 82 377 990 296 237 838 234 333 888 321 Peak-hour factor, PHF '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 458 886 82 377 990 296 237 838 234 333 888 321 RTOR Reduction(vph)A: 0 8 0 0 0 172 ~. 0 43 0 0 0 233 Lane Group Flow (vph) 458 960 0 377 990 124 237 1029 0 333 888 88 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) .. 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm,,,, Prot .,,,,,,.,..,,Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 42.3 14.7 37.0 37.0 12.2 28.3 14.7 30.8 30.8 Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 42.3 14.7 37.0 37.0 12.2 28.3 A.,= 14.7 30.8 30.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.35 0.12 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.24 0.12 0.26 0.26 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph). 587 1804 421 1556 474 341 1139 ,' '420 1318 391 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.19 c0.11 c0.20 0.07 c0.21 c0.10 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08x:. 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.53 0.90 0.64 0.26 0.70 0.90 0.79 0.67 0.23 Uniform Delay,d1 47.9 31.0 51.9 35.7 31.2 52.1 44.5 x�=_ 1.2 40.1 35.2 Progression Factor 0.54 0.36 0.75 0.66 0.81 0.66 0.55 0.60 0.50 0.45 Incremental Delay,d2 4 4 -0.8 17.1 1.6 1.1 3.2 , 6.8 7.4 0.9 0.1 Delay(s) 30.4 11.8 56.0 25.2 26.3 37.8 31.3 38.4 21.0 16.1 Level of Service ,< C B E C =:: C D . • C .r ---D C ,,B Approach Delay(s) '17.8 32.4 32.5 23.7 Approach LOS B .a,C .;t �� ,. .> C r.,x C l HCM Average Control Delay .` 26:7 ' 1`tCVt` e o ?V1 ` ;-'' C E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 -` '' Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (mire) 15 x. .. . ..,..A . .......;,..„ 4- ,. c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized |Dk)FSeCti )n Cup8Cih/ /\O8|y5is 3350- S 324St & Pacific Hwy S 0412712007 4EIN EIB T E�BR| �`�VVBL _ Vv NBT N8R ' Lane Configurations t if ttT+ W4 Ideal F/nw(vphp() 1800 1900 1000 1000 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1900 1000 Grade (%) 1% 196 0% U% Total Lost time (n) 5.0 5.0 5�0 5.0 5.0� � 5.0 5.0 5,0 5�0 Lone Uhl. Factor 1.00 1.00 1-00 0-07 100 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frob. ped/bikea 1.00 1l0 0.97 1.00 1/00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 F|pb. ped/bikos 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 180 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 180 1.00 0.85 1.00 0'98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0,99 F|t Protected 8.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 035 1.00 Sohd. Fkow(prod 1778 1812 1500 3361 1786 �@�� 1755 4934 1713 4943 F|i PonniMnd 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.05 1D0 0.05 1.00 0.95 1.00 Smbj. Flow(perm) 1778 1812 1500 3361 1788 1755 4034 1713 4943 Vo|ume (vph) 196 207 208 328 250 40 267 1185 234 184 1127 122 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 110 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 Adj. F|mm(vph) 190 207 208 328 250 49 287 1185 234 184 1127 122 RTOR Raduotion (vph) O U 170 0 8 0 0 21 0 O 10 O Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 207 38 328 203 O 267 1398 O 184 1239 8 ConU. Peda.(#/hr) 10 18 iO iO 10 10 10 *10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) O 8 8 8 2 O 2 0 O 8 8 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 G Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green. G (x) 14.9 227 22.7 15.4 23.2 24.0 47.1 15.8 3&9 Effective Green, 8(o) 14.4 22.2 222 14.9 �22 7 , ` 24.0 471 15.8 38.9 � Aotuahedg/C Ratio 012 0.18 018 012 010 0.20 0.30 013 0.32 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.6 4�5 4�5 5.0 5.0 ' 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane kxjh\ 213 335 278 417 338 3S1 1 ^ -� --, ` ' ' ~~ ^ �~��_�'~"~`����� v/s Ratio Prot oO.11 0.11 010 c016 0i15 oU.28 0.11 cO.25 v/a Ratio Perm ' . 8.03 wt Ratio O�82 0.62 0]4 079 0.87--- 0.76 --------'~-~-~~~ ~--~~`-~~~ Uniform Delay, d1 52.2 45.0 40.9 51]] 47.2 45.3 30.9 38.6 /��� Progression Factor 072 0.68 0.83 1.00 1.00 072 0.61 079 0.48 Incremental Delay,d2. 36.7 21`~ 01 87 19.4 8.1 2. 4.5 2.8 ��8�w Do (x) 74.4 32.6 25-8 59.8 86-8 407 212 54.S 10.6 Leve Vf��������� E ��� � E ^ U D B .�- - Approach De|ay(s) 437 83.0 24.3 24.1 Wl ' ppfpq ` ' ��, ,° ~w��w�,��^.�^. HCM � ' `c` 32.5Mp HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time '� |nhysedkm Capacity Utilization 84.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lone Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/0312007 New Trip Assignment, orU7 BC. orO7 With Project Synohvo G Report City ofFederal VVuy Pagel • HCM Unsignalized Intersection pacity Analysis 3550: S 328 St & Pacific Hwy S II 04/27/2007 4\ t fUttti� .. EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT . SBR Lane Configurations +4T ++i Sign Control Stop Free Free 41,,w ° ,N? f i.- 1:;- Grade 0% 0% -2% Volume(veh/h) 0 91 0 1688 1916 74� �,; Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 91 0 1688 1916 74: ° Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) aye h:12.0 12.0 12.0: Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 ,. Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised � ' �, YP ,. 7 Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal (ft) 641. w 4 pX, platoon unblocked 0.85 vC, conflicting volume 2536 696 2000l'4--tar vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1963 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 573 vCu, unblocked vol 2453 696 2000 tC, single(s) v 6,8 6.9 4:1 � , IC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF 3.5 3.3 2.2a. .x . . x . .. . p0 queue free % 100 76 100 cM capacity(vehth} 80 378 281 Volume Total `91 563 563 `7G' s;766 453 ° Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 91 0 0 0 0 0 74 cSH 378 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity _ 0.24 0.33 0.33 0.33 0,45 0,45 0.2 Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 �_.. Control Delay(s) 17.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 - , 0.0; 0.0 0. Lane LOS C Approach Delay(sI =• 17,5 0.0 +p Approach LOS C Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.6% , ICU Level of Service . Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3650: S 330 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/27/2007 - . -0" C f- 4 4\ t t` `* ir 1 Moir, 6 , ` E..y EBL WBT WBR NBL ..,,NBT ...NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 'Fn ) T. 1' , t1i Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 `1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -4% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 0 -` Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes i .`4 ,'1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt a_4 1.00 0.88 > 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.99 .,fal,0 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(trot) 1737 1628 :°1689 1573 1752 4951 1787 5067 _:_ -1 Flt Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1314 1628 1292 1573 1752 4951 1787 5067 . Volume (vph) 72 8 38 22 6 53 138 1230 51 202 1538 21 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00> 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 72 8 38 22 6 53 138 1230 51 202 1538 21 RTOR Reduction(vph)<4 0 35 0 0 49 0 ..;,-- 0 3 0 0 1 - 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 72 11 0 22 10 0 138 1278 0 202 1558 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) ,, 10 10 10 10 . . 10 • 10 10 .410 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 8 8 0 6 0 6 0 0 8 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4= `_ 8 ... ,,.. ; Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 13.0 64.9 30.1 82.0 Effective;Green, g(s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 13.0 '64.9 30.1 82 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.54 0.25 0.68 Clearer e`firs(4) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 '` 4. Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 110 136 -1Q8: 131 190 2678 448 3462 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.01 c0.08 c0.26 0.11 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm c0 05 , *, . >,F. k. 0.02 .- = ' . v/c Ratio 0.65 0.08 0.20 0.08 0.73 0.48 0.45 0.45 Uniform.Delay,d1 53.3 50.8 __51.3 50.8 i 51.8 17.1 $f' _38.0 8.7- _' Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 0.59 0.45 Incremetittlay,d2 10.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 11.1 0.6 .a-- 0.2 0,4 Delay (s) 63 5 50.9 51.6 50.8 62.7 18.1 22.8 4.3 Level of Service � . E D , ,.;, D D E B . :C A . Approach Delay(s) 58.6 51.1 22.4 6.4 Approach,.LOS _: E '''.'''''-1 .'-, D " .. •C,:::::„;a: 01 ¢ ' HCM,A e .;Control Delay ;:: 16.0 ' HCMa.evel oof Service T ,Ei HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49 Actuated Cycle Length (s) .': 120.0 Sum of lost times � . -,' Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) ,, 15 g c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersectior pacity Analysis 3750: S 332 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 t Movement;; EBL EBR, .NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r '' t +41 Sign Control Stop Free Free 7 Grade 0% 2% -2% Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 60 146 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 0 60 146 + Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) ... . 2 � Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None .> . >- Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) X ,yy Kam` 680 R.a�l.. pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 166 49 146 �z vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 166 49 146 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3,3 2,2 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 808 1010 1434 NB 2: NB 3 NB.4 . SB • • - Volume a of 0 ;O.r, 20 20 20 58' 58 29 F Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05*= 'o cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 '1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00, 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.02 , � Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0, 0.0 n Lane LOS A Approach Delay(s) • 0.0 0.0 `* . 0• Approach LOS A ...r T. -�.. fir.. ..... . Average Delay 0.0 ICU Level of Service_�: "` Intersection Capacity tli�atiort.� . .., _.. _-_.. Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection ..apacity Analysis 3850: S 333 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 t �► 1 ` Lane Configurations ++1+ ttt Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade -2% 2% -2% Volurr MOI/11) 0 15 1632 9 0 3298 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Hi y€tow sate(vph) 0 15 1632 9 0 3298i"' ; < Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane<Width(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percentkage 1 1 rt� Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) 1 Upstream sift(It) ;` . ' � 1110 pX, platoon unblocked 0.81 0.81 0.81 vC I ioIt1FTTe 2756 *� a. S, 1 a5'1 , vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1646 vC2 fs100.# ; nf vol 1109 x 4 vCu, unblocked vol 2699 6 1339 tC,single( ! 6.8 6.9 4.1 . . S * . tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF 3 :Sti4t ,:, WV. 2,2 p0 queue free % 100 98 100 ` X�. Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vo u e tit. 15 .. (f 0. 9 0 0 0' cSH 859 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to apa 0.02 ':_0 3& Q: O . 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control "{**i ; 9.3 0 t1 . -0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A Approach(Detay,(s); Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.0 Inte 7 : ICU Level of Service D .r Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection C city Analysis 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/27/2007 Movement" , ,.. , EBL ; EBT EBR WBL WBT .WBR NBL NBaINBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) t r "I Ti VI tft ttt r Ideal Flow(vphpl) - . 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ,. 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1%, 1% 3% -3% Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes r--4 7 . 1 00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 ;~.. 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt sw , ., ,: �1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) ;; 1718 1853 1502 1717 3289 3368 4872 ''1796 5120 1556 Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 302 1853 1502 332 3289 3368 4872 1796 5120 1556 Volume (vph) 268 427 402 191 391 223 269 1087 131 156 1308 262 Peak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 268 427 402 191 391 223 269 1087 131 156 1308 262 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 194 0 72 0 0 11 0 0 0 68 Lane Group Flow(vph) 268 427 208 191 542 0 269 1207 0 156 1308 194 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt 1, Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 44. " , ^. , v. 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 48.4 32.3 32.3 39.8 28.0 12.9 43.0 12.9 43.0 59.1 Effective Green, g(s) 'I.48.4 32 3 32.3 39`8 28.0: , �` ,' 12,9 43.0441Rtjt.12.9 43.0 59.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.27 0.27 0.33 0.23 0.1'1 0.36 0.11 0.36 0.49 Clearance Time(s) • may. 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0- 5.0 5.0 5.0 .4,',., 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 312 499 404 246 767 1.74440.41... 362 17,., ' , i".193 1'835 766 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.23 0.08 0.16 0.08 0.25 c0.09 c0.26 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 0.14 0.18, W _` 1` O': 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.86 0.52 0.78 0.71 0.74 0.69 0.81 0.71 0.25 Uniform Delay,di 27.7 41.6 37.2 31.8 42.2 , x�` 51.9 32.: 'sue `- 52.3 33.2 17.7 Progression Factor 0.86 0.90 0.82 0.59 0.71 0.95 0.71 1.01 1.01 0.96 - Irtcremental Delay,,i;14t17.9 11.8 0.4 7.4 1.3 :! 7.0 2: _ %:.<, 20.4 2.4 0.1 Delay(s) 41.8 49.2 30.9 26.1 31.4 56.1 25.7 73.0 35.9 17.0 Level of Service ,, ` `. D D ':4:;.0 .:_i °C C . E ` .., A. . x E D B Approach Delay(s) 40.7 30.2 31.2 36.4 .. : D ,.: o4 r9 wi•:, , m, ,.- . ,f l "Level of Seri - ., tea.".� -ii HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 M „ .' Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.1% ra= . p y ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) , 1 , . ,4k . n ._ _.s. . ji c Critical Lane Group _ Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3025: SW 320 St & 26 Av SW 04/30/2007 %' --0' r '-- 4\ t r \* 1 4/ Movernept.,: EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'j f i ) Ti, ) 1 ) 1+ Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% -1% -4% 3% Total Lost time(s)> 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,pe€l ces ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00; 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.90 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Saki. Flow(part)'. . 1744 3504 1739 3527 1749 1658 1702 1608 Fit Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.75 1.00 Satd.Flow(perrrt) 464 3504 ' 786 3527 1363 1658 1349 1608 Volume (vph) 6 582 8 122 1078 12 69 2 5 17 8 18 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00' `1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 6 582 8 122 1078 12 69 2 5 17 8 18 RTOR=Reductiion(vph) 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 5 0 0 17 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 6 590 0 122 1090 0 69 2 0 17 9 0 Co nft f eds.(##hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 1 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 101.6 101.6 101.6 101.6 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 Effective Green, g„(s) 101.6 101.6 3.03001.6 101.6 8.4 8.4 `'' 8.4 8,4 ✓= `, Actuated g/C Ratio 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 !` Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap'(V'ph) 393 2967 , 665 2986 95 116 , ti_ : 94 113 v/s Ratio Prot 0.17 c0.31 0.00 0.01 v/ss.. '�s . ,-': 0.01 0.16 cO.05 = 0.01 r v/c Ratio 0.02 0.20 0.18 0.36 0.73 0.02 0.18 0.08 U 1.4 1.7 ,-, 1.7 2-0 - 54.7 52.0 52.6 52.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.18 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental'Delay,-d2 0.1 0.2 7 0.2 0.1 20.7 0.0 0.3 0.1 Delay(s) 1.5 1.8 0.5 0.4 75.3 52.0 52.9 52.3 Level of Service A A A A-. E D D D Approach Delay(s) 1.8 0.5 73.2 52.5 Ap€1r th-LOS A A E, D r n.: Ys .t'e'R 'gip .:c e '4 ' s ss .i;;I ' !` ;{ 1• 11'-t ;I t 1 5,. 4'',, fceR;a HCM Average Control`Delay 4.9 °`HCM Level of Service A i w.< HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) �ilNz . 0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis P iodd(r iri) - 15 <' C1.<.. ,. i? �. ��,,_ ,. c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection C city Analysis 3028: SW 320 St & 21 Av SW 04/30/2007 }' C .4- '\ t 7fr \* 1 d Mover flt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Sar,'-'4111 Lane Configurations ) t1 '1/1 t ) t ri ) ti Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 '1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3386 3412 3434 1748 1863 '1530 1750 3280 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3386 3412 3434 146 1863 1530 747 3280 Volume(vph) 172 404 112 433 758 100 180 408 267 8'1 707 423 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 172 404 112 433 758 100 180 408 267 81 707 423 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 8 0 0 0 90 0 72 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 172 496 0 433 850 0 180 408 177 81 1058 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 3 3 3 0 3 0 2 2 3 3 Turn Type Prot Prot pm-rpt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 .,',NAT*1 -,,,A,i,,.Agf., 2 7 4 5 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.4 25.7 18.4 30.7 60.9 50.6 69.0 50.7 45.4 Effective Green, g (s) '13.4 25.7 18.4 30.7 60.9 50.6 69.0 50.7 45.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.21 - 0.15 0.26 '��. y, 0.51 0.42 0.58 0.42 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 198 725 523 879 214 786 944 360 1241 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.15 0.13 c0.25 c0.07 ' 0.22 0.03 0.01 0.32 .; v/s Ratio Perm c0.35 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 7 0.87 0.68 0.83 0.97 0.84 0.52 0.19 0.23 0.85 ," , Uniform Delay, d1 52.4 43.4 49.3 44.1 29.8 25.7 -12.1 21.4 34.2 Progression Factor. 0.97 0.96 - 1.00 1.00 * _1.21 0.87 0.46 0.48 0.70 , n Incremental Delay, d2 29.7 2.1 9.9 22.2 23.7 2.4 0.0 0.1 6.7 Delay(s) 80.6 44.0 59.2 66.4 59.6 24.8 5.7 10.4 30.6 F Level of Service F D E E E C A B C Approach Delay(s) 53.1 64.0 " 26.2 29 2 Approach LOS D E C C Irtters fl $.41 ary.E -* - , HCM Average Control Delay 43.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.9% ,,_.ICU Level of Service,'- Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ;- ;F >} ,.. �� ' "a. "t ', -t _` .. ,14-`-' Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection capacity Analysis 3031: SW 320 St & 14 Wy SW 04/30/2007 Lane Configurations 4i. 4i� '►� Sign Control Free Free Stop mow; Grade 0% 0% 2% Volume(veh/h) 32 994 1630 28 16 25 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flout/rate(vph) 32 994 1630 28 16 25 s Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 • = ° ,- • ., <; Right turn flare (veh) Median type; TWLTL x rim.Median storage veh) 1 Upstream*t nai(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conf ► }volume 1668 2225 849' ' vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1654 vC2, stage°°2 conf vol `; 571 1.' vCu, unblocked vol 1668 2225 849 tC, s sin le � �: 9 f } 4.1 6.8 6-9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) • 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 92 85 92 cM capacity(veh/h) 378 109 299. �. $$ '.. EB 1 EB 2 ::EB 3::WB12 W Volume Total 32 497 497 1087 571 41 Volume Left 32 0 0 0 0 16 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 28 25 cSH 378 1700 1700 1700 1700 178 V r .e*,Capacity 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.64 0.34 0.23 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 0 0 0 0 21 Cpntrol't lay($) 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.3 a _' Lane LOS C D Approach Delay(s) 0.5 0.0 31.3` F °% • Approach LOS N D ..F �M s_li: Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ; ICU Level of Service <: B Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection )acity Analysis 3032: SW 320 St & 13 PI SW 04/30/2007 --► `i c �-- 4\ P Lane Configurations +T* tt ► Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 1% -1`)/0 2% Volume(veh/h) 885 11 95 1680 4 63 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly floWirate(vph) 885 11 95 1680 4 63- Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Bl ckage :> 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) TW LTL Median storage veh) 1 Upstrearn-signal.(f pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume :, 906 1940 :4 x . vC1, stage 1 conf vol 900 vC2 sty 2,cont.vol 1040 .::, vCu, unblocked vol 906 1940 468 4.1 6.8 6.9 ,; � . tC, 2 stage (s) 5 8 2.2 3.5 3.3 � } : p0 queue free % 87 97 88 740 159 ` 532 WB 2 WB-3, NB a . Vokiffie'Txo 5' 590 3(3( ..- `95 840 840 fr Volume Left 0 0 95 0 0 4 Volume Righ -` 0 11 0 0 0 63+. :. � cSH 1700 1700 740 1700 1700 467 Volume to Capacity 0.35 0.18 0.13 0.49 0.49 0.14 r„ 44 r Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 11 0 0 12 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 10,6 0,0 0.0 14.0 Lane LOS B B Appt' i 0.0'. 0.6 14.0 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.7 lrit-. . ...,•� r Analysis Period(min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3033: SW 320 St & 11 PI SW 04/30/2007 Moment•. EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL Lane Configurations V Sign Control Free Free Stop , a Grade 1% -1% -13% Volume(veh/h) 890 0 0 1601 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 890 0 0 1601 0 tl x Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 _.E.� Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1,1 p ..._ Right turn flare (veh) Median type • TWLTL Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal (ft) " pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 900 * 1710 46 • vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 900 vC2,stage 2 conf vol , 810' � �r r .?� ,`.. vCu, unblocked vol 900 1710 465 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 . 7.4 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity(vehlh) 744 208 • [3i>a titttt;b ane# ''EB 1 Volume Total 593 297 0 800 800 0 Volume Left 0 O 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.35 0.17 0.00 0.47 0.47 0 Ea & ``il Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A .> Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 �0.0�� . �����,� Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 . HCM Unsignalized Intersection pacity Analysis 3034: SW 320 St & 10 PI SW 04/30/2007 4- 4/ Movcnent 6" I;: EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations IN tf +1 Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -1% 0% Volume (veh/h) 40 1407 1599 55 31 200 s . ,%o ; Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate(vph) 40 1407 1599 55 31 200 _ >-, ° Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0, 12.0 12.0 #ke Walking Speed(ftls) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1` 1 7 t Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL: Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal (ft) i*;is jo- . . pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1664 ( 77 4.,� ; 2430 = , ,. 1„,!,, vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1636 vC2, stage 2 conf vot 4 , ` '` 7944f. _ = vCu, unblocked vol 1664 2430 847 tC, single (s) 4.1 -' 6.W 0.Y6,9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3'5 .,.. 4 -:'' p0 queue free % 89 70 33 cM capacity(veh/h) 379 102 300 g 0. 0,-:' 1,0 46 Direction, Lane# EB 1 < EB 2 EB 3 W B.1 W B-2 SB 1 r9b .: Volume Total 40 704 704 1066 588 231 Volume Left 40 0 0 0 0 31 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 55 200 r _ f LL & , cSH 379 1700 1700 I700 1700 238 Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.41 0.41 0.63 0.35 0.97 " - ` _ ;::17 `* Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 0 0 0 222 Control Delay(s) 15.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,0.0 95.1 k4 > : " Lane LOS C F Approach Delay(s) 0.4 0.0 95.1 } 6 +" Approach LOS F ttterseetiafrSummary :, Y .te. ., :. Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.3u/10 ICU Level of Service C =', Analysis Period (min) 15 ti, Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersectioi. ,,apacity Analysis 3036: SW 320 St & 7 Ay SW 04/30/2007 Movern a EB EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt 114 Sign Control Free Free Stop .._, Grade 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 859 1474 30 14 5 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 859 1474 30 14 5 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 °;. ,, .. ... . • Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 :. .; 1 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TW LTL Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1514 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1499 vC2,stage 2 conf vol p 450 : ,a ..: . .. r u g vru, nblocked of 1,14 1948 772 tC, single (s) 4.1 44iiroo. .< 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 ,1. a_ . K - 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 90 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 434 137 336 $f Qt( , . - €. . > EB_ . . B2: `EB3 <WB1. - t 6j Volume Total 5 430 430 983 521 19 Volume Left 5 0 0 0 0 14 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 30 5 T' ;.;<.: a cSH 434 1700 1700 1700 1700 162 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.58 0.31 0.12 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0 10 Control Delay(s) 13.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 302�� Lane LOS B D Approach Delay(s) 0,1 0.0 30.2 Approach LOS D Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection )acity Analysis 3037: SW 320 St & 6 PI SW 04/30/2007 WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations +1* ft Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade -2%° 2% -1 Volume(veh/h) 1050 24 100 1683 17 71 x ry Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flaw,rate(vph) , . 1050 24 100 1683 17 71 .. . Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width(ft) 12.0, 12-0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1' Right turn flare(veh) 4 Median type ,,., x �. • Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal(f pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume ,:,`, 1084 2124. vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1072 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 1052 vCu, unblocked vol 1084 2124 557 tC,single ; 4.1 6:8 6.9 �.. tC, 2 stage(s) 5.8 tF 2.2 • 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 84 88 85 cM`caPacitl! , VolumeTofal = 700. ", 374 100 842 842 Volume Left 0 0 100 0 0 17 Volume Right 0 24 0 0 0 71 cSH 1700 1700 634 1700 1700 578 Volume to Capacity 0.41 0.22 0.16 0.49 0.49 0.15 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 14 0 0 13 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 11.7 , 0.0 0.0 18 `- Lane LOS B C Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.7. 18.1 Approach LOS C � �, � � ,�� .... la .R'h T y �3`4__ .,,.... ;�rt �' ..i� �.a.„ ,- .. ,...... h - r .. .s. .3,. Average Delay 0.9 Intersection C a ty titization . 61.0% ICU Level of Service s Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S 04/30/2007 24 c & 4\ t t \* 1 d Movement EBL EBT _ EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL=,,, SST SBR Lane Configurations VI +13 VI +T r 11) fT rf » ft Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -1 9/0 -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3347 3323 3436 3528 1497 3423 3557 1534 3383 3507 1495 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3347 3323 3436 3528 1497 581 3557 1534 879 3507 1495 Volume (vph) 141 817 154 397 1347 238 349 519 311 199 605 191 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 141 817 154 397 1347 238 349 519 311 199 605 191 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 12 0 0 0 103 0 0 40 0 0 139 Lane Group Flow (vph) 141 959 0 397 1347 135 349 519 271 199 605 52 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 '' 4 0 n n 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 'I 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.8 47.4 18.8 57.4 57.4 34.8 24.8 43.6 32.8 23.8 23.8 Effective Green, g (s) 8.8 47.4 18.8 57.4 57.4 34.8 24.8 43.6 32.8 23.8 23.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.39 0.16 0.48 0.48 0.29 0.21 0.36 0.27 0.20 0.20 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 245 1313 538 1688 716 405 735 557 428 696 297 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.29 c0.12 c0.38 c0.07 0.15 0.08 0.03 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 c0.18 0.10 0.09 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.73 0.74 0.80 0.19 0.86 0.71 0.49 0.46 0.87 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 53.8 30.9 48.3 :;26.4 17.9 35.1 44.2 29.5 34.2 46.6 39.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.30 0.06 0.88 0.92 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 2.0 3.6 2.9 2.6 0.4 15.6 2.4 0.2 0.3 10.9 0.1 Delay(s) 55.8 34.5 39.5 10.6 1.5 46.5 43.2 20.6 34.5 57.5 40.0 Level of Service E C D B ADDCC E D Approach Delay(s) 37.2 15.3 38.2 49.5 Approach LOS D B D D Intersection Sum ,t I'` - _ ,SM"- T z as >c$ -EP a' k 1` � 4 ,`; 9+P HCM Average Control Delay 31.5 HCMtevel of:Service " C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersectior pacity Analysis 3043: S 320 St & 5 Av S 04/30/2007 C 4-- 4\ P M i EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations +1 , ttt r Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 1% -2% 2% Volume(veh/h) 1553 25 129 2158 10 89 t Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourlyflow h 1553 25 129 2158 10 89 f vp } �z..y . . Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Widtth.(ft) 12.0 12.0 12:0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage, 1 Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 1 Upstrea ,signal:.(ft) 1157 . .p . pX, platoon unblocked 0.64 vC,conflicting volume 1588 2563 550 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1576 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 987 u. . : vCu, unblocked vol 1588 2320 550 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3f � ,. p0 queue free % 68 91 81 clsA capacity"(veh/h) - 406 109 471 1 EB.2:`;, EB 3 WB 1 WB 2, B 3 WB 4 . NB=1 <NB 2 VolumeTora 621 621 336 129 719 719 719 10 89 Volume Left 0 0 0 129 0 0 0 10 0 Volume Right 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 89 t cSH 1700 1700 1700 406 1700 1700 1700 109 471 Volume to CApacity 0.37 0.37 0.20 0.32 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.09 0.19 14 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 7 17 Control Delay i s}" •' 0_0 0.0 0.0 17.9 '.0.0 0.0 0.0 41.3 14.4 g Lane LOS C E B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 1:0 ,014 17.1 Approach LOS C Average Delay 1.0 Intersecti Capa Util zation. U Level of Sery ; 44: Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection v-opacity Analysis 3046: S 320 St & 8 Av S 04/30/2007 J -* c 4- 4\ t /* `► 1 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT,, WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t ft4 +f'* 4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% -4% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 ° *. ? 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.93 '--T ' 4; 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.97 Satd. Flow(prot) 1720 4948 1805 5076 1658 1 ,,_- 1716 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 0.79 Satd. Flow(perm) 1720 4948 1805 5076 1597 1397 Volume (vph) 38 1397 12 26 2069 141 10 22 33 120 19 54 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 38 1397 12 26 2069 141 10 22 33 120 19 54 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 6 '-: 0 0 23 0 0 10 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 1408 0 26 2204 0 0 42 0 0 183 0 Confi. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 *10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 4 0 0 6 2 6 2 4 4 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases `:` 2 ; ` i ;6 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.0 64.3 4.3 62.6 38.4 37.4 • Effective Green, g (s) 5.0 63.3 4.3 62.6 37.4 37.4 Imo Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.53 0.04 0.52 0.31 0.31 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 72 2610 65 2648 . __ . 498 "`- 435 4 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.28 0.01 c0.43 v/s Ratio Perm " fi �. v/c Ratio 0.5'3 0.54 0.40 0.83 0.08 0.42 Y '. w 32.7 ` Uniform Delay, d 1 56.3 18.7 ��;56.6 24.3 > � 5�°. ,,. 29.2 �, �, Progression Factor 1.21 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 Incremental Delay, d2 2.8 0.7 1.5 2.3 , x ' 0.3 * _: 0.2 Delay(s) 71.0 16.4 58.1 26.6 29.5 34.8 Level of Service E B E C ` x< • i ,F :;, C C 4 , Approach Delay(s) 17.8 27.0 29.5 34.8 Approach LOS B C C - , .- C V. Intersebilibb ummary>, . i ri `itIVk -tip ' 2 ,4 0 HCM Average Control-Delay 24.0 HCM Level:of Service C -= �- HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) �, � Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period min 15 l c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capa Analysis 04/30/2007 3047: S 320 St & 10 Av S --+ c ~ 4\ p Movement ,_EBT EBR WBL VVI3T_ NBL NBA Lane Configurations ++ +++ Sign Control Free Free Stop .' " : .4 -4% 0% Grade 1407 0 0 1468 0 0 s . ...';3 **t . Volume(veh/h} Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00u Hourly flow rate(vph) 1407 0 0 1468 0 -0 .r I _, , r 10 10 Pedestrians 10 12.0 12.0 a, . .r . x . . ma's Lane Width(ft) 12.0 4.0 4.0 . Walking Speed (ftls) 4.0w Percent Blockage ° , 1: > .� � . uwI Right turn flare(veh) � . IM Median type �� 1 Median storage veh) , �7l- �35e 520 661'` ** 470. Upstream signal(ft) 0 83 0.91 0.83 pX, platoon unblocked ,r . a " �: 141T �� ,.., 1916 489 vC,conflicting volume r..:. t : vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1417 vC2,stage 2 conf vol , �, c 1082 975 0 vCu, unblocked vol .,A a 6.8 6•9 . ,'�. - , .-`" ... . s . 4.1 tC, single(s) ., - �.,. ��. � � 5.8 tC, 2 stage (s) _� :.� iit 2 2 _ 3.5 3 3 � �� s . tF (s) ���`� 100 100 100 p0 queue free /0 cM capacity(vehth) ,,�_524 214 880i . 1'- B2 =EB3. .WB1:.W B2 :.WB3 : >. , .._ _ :�._.. :_, V` Total� o 489 489 489 0 Volume ' „, 5563 563 281 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Left l`..�0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _:; . Volume Right� , � ` �. cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 � 0.33 0.33 0.17 0.00 0.29 0.29- 0.29 0.00 ' �._ Volume to Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 � , a.0 o.o 0o,A 00 004 00 00 0.0 Control Delay(s) A Lane LOS �` 0.0 , . �� s"` _ 0 0 " " . ; Approach Delay(s) 0.0 A Approach LOS .� fib'-,^,.. tkil. ., Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization a' 9 i iilcU Level of Service 42 � . ,... Analysis Period (min) 15f� Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report Page 1 City of Federal Way HCM Signalized Intersection \Jdpacity Analysis 3048: S 320 St & 11 PI S 04/30/2007 -0' c 4- & t /*' \* i' 1 kit::'-. '--7 '-',:;',- :::60,1441W04EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT • SBR Lane Configurations 'I tf '1 1+1 j 4* 44 Ideal Flow(vphpt) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 2% -1% 2% -3% Total Lost time,(s) 5.0 5.Q `, .5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb,** ,. 3 t9 ' 'E.04 1.00 1..00 0.99 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt > , s_'=. t 4 97 1:00 0.99 1.00 0.94 0.92 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.99 Satc1:. 4 tt) ,*`= 1752 400' .1764 5022 1611 1583 1678 Flt Permitted 0.95 .1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.99 Satt.;i~ F)." 1T52 3 :=1764;" 5022 1611 1583 1678 Volume(vph) 32 1264 268 88 1460 53 453 5 108 30 60 131 Peak-hourfsctor, RHF 1.00 =1 # . 1j 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 h , Adj. Flow(vph) 32 1264 268 88 1460 53 453 5 108 30 60 131 RTOR=# t ;(vph) . U 24 ;ig- ;:,. 0' 3 0 0 20 0 0 ,t =r:. Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 1508 0 88 1510 0 289 257 0 0 175 0 ConfL led;:(fir):: 10 40 : ,10.. , 10 10 10 10 _ Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 2 2 8 0 8 0 2 2 2 8 Turn>Type Prot Prate Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 3.6 52.2 8.9 57.5 24.5 24.5 15.9 Effective *.r3(1 ... .. },> ., 575 24.0 / 24.0 14.9 ..< Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.44 0.07 0.48 0.20 0.20 0.12 Clear a}$ 5.0 4.5 4.5 `r am 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lar „ 3 y ,h)` .,<01, 2406 322 317 �-x = ..;.f .-. 208 . v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.31 c0.05 0.30 c0.18 0.16 c0.10 vt. v/c Ratio 0 60 0.71 0.67. 0.63 0.90 0.81 0.84 Uniform 00y,dt t,. 4 ff i .,._4 =1_ 23.3. 46.8 45.8 „ s: ?*. 51.4 Progression Factor 1.01 1.00 1.07 0.98 1.05 1.06 1.00 Incremental c 2 1: P ,';;8.4 1.0 24.1 13.0: `". A :24.6 Delay(s) 70.4 29.8 66.3 23.9 73.2 61.3 76.0 Level:of Stine " ==R � ,... . . E C E E F: E �:. ; Approach Delay(s) 30.7 26.2 �� "� Approa b 4 , *••.�4. r" g� C . ..f 67.4 76.0 ire : �E ��� � ��._ 4 c. - 4, :m'4,ufi i =a d x.f 1. ...5} i� '�'' 4�.i 's..+n.s5,, v 3 x MCltirl AVer `�trol�Delay #fi.7: HCM Level of Service '-'; ','''''-',1"::-' [) r �, HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) ,- . 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) _ „1 . 20.0 . ' °" '. Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) r � - . .- ._ ' c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Signalized Intersection C city Analysis 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 -/` --, ' C 4- '! '\ t / 4'' +Y Movement Wt:,;.EBT, EBR W BL, WBT WBR 'NBL NBT NBR SBL- .SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) tti fitt r 11) ill, , ) fitt r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0,4;; 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Utii. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,10.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3522 5119 3433 5045 1536 3358 4831 3426 5136 1522 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3522 5119 3433 5045 1536 3358 4831 3426 5136 1522 Volume (vph) 458 886 82 377 990 296 237 838 234 333 888 321 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 458 886 82 377 990 296 237 838 234 333 888 321 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 0 `172 0 43 0 0 0 233 Lane Group Flow (vph) 458 960 0 377 990 124 237 1029 0 333 888 88 Canfl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 7:14M °•'10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases :yid f 8 4? 41l0 °_.- 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 42.3 14.7 37.0 37.0 12.2 28.3 14.7 30.8 30.8 Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 42.3 $. 14.7 37.0 37.0 12.2 28.3 14.7 30.8 30.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.35 0.12 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.24 0.'12 0.26 0.26 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 '�`' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 587 1804 s- 421 1556 474 341 1139 420 1318 391. v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.19 c0.11 c0.20 0.07 c0.21 c0.10 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm; Z_ .: 0.08 . 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.53 0.90 0.64 0.26 0.70 0.90 0.79 0.67 0.23 Uniform Delay, di 47.9 31.0 ; ' 51.9 35.7 31.2 52.1 44.5 51.2 40.1 35.2 Progression Factor 0.54 0.36 0.75 0.66 0.81 0.66 0.55 0.60 0.50 0.45 Incremental Delay,d2 4.4 0.8 ' 17.1 1.6 1.1 3.2 6.8 w ', 7.4 0.9 0.1 Delay(s) 30.4 11.8 56.0 25.2 26.3 37.8 31.3 38.4 2'1.0 16.1 Level of Service C B E C C D C `.;;,: D C B Approach Delay (s) 17.8 32.4 32.5 23.7 Approach LOS B C C C .f HCM Average Control Delay 4 ,,i.; 26.7 HCM Level of Service C 4,, $4 tl -4_ HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 4, Sum of lost time (s) 20 0 ,71 T", Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 4)w £ 3 ;A,.,,s;,.< t 7_ '1 c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection ..opacity Analysis 3052: S 320 St & 20 Ay S 04/30/2007 Movement' `g` 1 .EBL 1,f-1-4M-z...44W WBL WBT °WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations a ++1+ ,) tti ) I ) I Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 .5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 . 5.0 5.0 5.0 0;0$ Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 , Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3485 5068 1 3399 4896 1718 1711 1747 1678 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.35 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3485 5068 3399 4896 499 1711 644 1678 Volume (vph) 243 1054 64 50 1412 145 147 84 81 191 88 159 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Flow (vph) 243 1054 64 50 1412 145 147 84 81 191 88 159 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 8 0 0 33 0 0 61 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 243 1114 0 50 1549 0 147 132 0 191 186 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 6 0 0 8 0 8 0 6 6 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.1 68.1 5.2 61.2 25.7 15.0 29.7 17.0 Effective Green, g (s) 12.1 68 1 .>. ` 5.2 61.2 24.7 14.5 28.7 16.5 .ir Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.57 0.04 0.51 0.21 0.12 0.24 0.14 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) .. 351 2876-; 147 2497 206 207 266 231 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.22 0.01 c0.32 0.06 0.08 c0.07 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm =Y" ': :: 0.09 0.10 �.r-° r' v/c Ratio 0.69 0.39 0.34 0.62 0.71 0.64 0.72 0.80 Uniform Delay, d1 52.2 14 4,, ,, 1 '' x: ' .�:_ � 'S5.7- 21.1 41.8 50.3 � . 39.3 50.2 Progression Factor 0.78 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Incremental Delay,d2 3.7 0 3-_t , 0.5 1.2 9.3 4.7 r:: 7.1 16.3 Delay(s) 44.2 14.0 56.3 22.2 51.1 55.0 46.4 66.0 Level of Service ' ' Vi i:` D B K.. iI E C D D . :2- D E = Approach Delay(s) 19.4 23.3 53.2 57.5 Approach LOS 4 B. C ; 4 ._ .. L E e ''. HCM Average Control Delay .28.4 , ; ^ 'L' et% 1 `a _,,, HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) ;: ` 120.0 Sum of lost time sv ' ` ' y Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) > ..1, ,1.`: 15 „- � : f .,, .,. . c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection )acity Analysis 3053: S 320 St & 21 PI S 04/30/2007 Movement> EB( � EBT, EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL . SBT = SBR Lane Configurations tt' tTi Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 5% 2% 0% 0° Volume(veh/h) 0 1086 0 0 1568 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 1086 0 0 1568 . ' 0 0 0 0 0 0-t 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft), Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage .s . ,.. . . r a`; Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised , .,. Median storage veh) 0 0 Upstream signal (ft) 641 -Az .. e pX, platoon unblocked 0.71 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.71 vC, conflicting volume 1568 1086 `' 1609 2654 362 1930 2654 523 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1086 1086 1568 1568 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 523 1568 362 1086 vCu, unblocked vol 984 910 647 2037 '120 1074 2037 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF (s) 2.2 0 2.2 • 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 '100 100 100 100 100 cMeepagity(vehfh), 496.. , iTit2; . 681 184 105 833 126 100. ; 770 217; r Y` 627 627 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right $ *1. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity " 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.18 0.00 0.00 ' Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s), 0.0 0.0 0.0, 0.0 0.0 0.0, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 ' Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0 0 y � < 0.0 a rtz_, "+ 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A A Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization,,,,. 34.5% ICU Level of.Service ; : Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection ",,pacity Analysis 3055: S 320 St & 23 Av S 04/30/2007 M .' >.. BL Eel. EBR. , OX I'b WBR . Nth(: , ' . . T, ... _ Lane Configurations ) tfi* )) T1l 'I + r II) k Ideal Flow(vphpt). 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb ped i* 3_ ; - =1;00 1.00 1.00` '. 1.00 1.00 t.00 0:99 t.00 0.99, Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00' 0.98 1.00 ` 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said-. FlOW(fx t) .�'; 3334 4824 3519 ' 5025 1704 1839 1456 3323 1773 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(peC'r) . 3334 4824 3519 5025 1704 1839 1456 3323 1773 Volume (vph) 113 1021 34 389 1536 256 114 257 457 501 217 84 Peak-hour i'�ct€ iF .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00` 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 t Adj. Flow(vph) 113 1021 34 389 1536 256 114 257 457 501 217 84 RTOR Redt vpt r fi 3 0 0 17 0 0 0 6, 0 (, Lane Group Flow(vph) 113 1052 0 389 1775 0 114 257 451 501 289 0 Confl. Peds:(#it 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 ``�,s,,.... Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 16 0 0 8 2 8 2 16 16 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Prot „. Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 41.5 19.0 50.5 11.8 20.5 39.5 20.0 28.7 Effective Gree4 (s) . 10.0 41.5 19.0 50.5 11.3 20.0 39.0. 19.5 28 2 _ ' Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.35 0.16 0.42 0.09 0.17 0.32 0.16 0.23 Clearance Ti ')'" 5.0 5.0 :=5.0 5.0;, 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 45. ` =q? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 1668 557 . 2115 160 307 534 540 417 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.22 0.11 c0.35 0.07 0.14 c0.13 c0.15 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 , v/c Ratio 0.41 0.63 0.70 0.84 0.71 0.84 0.84 0.93 0.69 Uniform Delay, d1 52.2 32.8 47.8 31.1 52.8 48.4 37.7 49.6 41.9 Progression Factor 1.01 1.00 0.80 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.83 Incremental Delay,d2 0.4 1.8 2.1 2.9 11.8 17.0 11.2 21.7 3.9 , Delay(s) 53.0 34.8 40.5 16.3 64.5 65.4 48.9 64.7 38.6 Level of Service D C D B ., E E D E D Approach Delay(s) 36.6 20.6 56.2 54.9 Approach LOS, D C E 9 f- HCM"Average trcB( belay 35.8 HCM Levef of-Service'" „ 5u,,. HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 try , - Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.0% ICU Level of Service E Anatysts:let ( nifp)` 15 c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Signalized Intersection C; ;ity Analysis 3056: S 320 St & Gateway Blvd S 04/30/2007 t -. c `- k- 4\ t P \w 1 I 7 : - 10,1` vp.R NBt `t om SB,T fs8f3 Lane Configurations tti., +44'F, 'j 1+ ) I Ideal F1ow601 ) 0900 1900 1900 1900 - 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -1`)/0 2% -1% Total Last _ .,i' ; 5.9 5.0 5:0 5.0 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,pow,:......, . T:E10` 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt . .,:„ "1:00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.86 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd FE _ sy; 4917 1778 -497.2 1729 1546 1650 1566 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.42 1.00 Satd FIT,,:,.: . 1752. 4917 • 1 8 .=4972 1287 1546 722 1566 Volume (vph) 55 2017 18 99 2033 320 76 14 207 162 4 73 Peak t r t t4 .< .: 1 00. 1.00 1.00 1 00' ' '00: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 55 2017 18 99 2033 320 76 14 207 162 4 73 RTORF -f „ 0 ' 0 0 15' 0 0 98= 0 , 0 58 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 55 2035 0 99 2338 0 76 123 0 162 19 0 Conft.Pelt 7. fl , ,' 10 1, 10 10 10 - 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 0 0 Turn Ty ,i ' '.Prot _- Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 8 PermEttt a z 4 �k.. 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.2 68.8 11.1 72.7 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 Effective `r' 7.2 68:8 11.1 72.7 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.1 • Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.57 0.09 0.61 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Cleart10 .' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Gr C( kffirg,105 2819 164 3012 269 323 i 61 ;Y v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.41 c0.06 c0.47 0.08 0.01 v/s Rates P 0.06 c022 v/c Ratio 0-.52 0.72 0.60 0.78 0.28 0.38 1.07 0.06 52.3 17.6 39.9 40.8 47:5 38.0 Progression Factor 0.87 0.49 0.98 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremetlf 10 c ,. , : 1 4:: '1.1 ', A 3.6 1.7 0.2 0.3 0 0_0 Delay(s) 49.0 10.2 54.9 14.5 40.1 41.0 141.5 38.0 Lever` - s a ��,� B w_ ., D B D D Approach Delay(s) 11.2 16.1 40.8 108.1 Approach l , : T... ' 'i-SFZ- :B B Q ° :` F -,. +6 V µ 4 p. f HCIt i eaVoyr rye p.jely - 1; :° .HCM Level of Service B* HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated � (sY , ,,y x. : .120E 0;; .�' Sum of lost time (s) �>- , 15.0 `" Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Pen 15 , : , c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection -pacity Analysis 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB Ramp 04/30/2007 -% -* - T i( * t 4\ r c ( ./ Movement.- EBL EBT EBR. WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SWL2 SWL SWR - , Lane Configurations TT+ r ) t+f ) rrr Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 54 ti;'4:•-• Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb,ped/bikes" ti 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ; Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt '; ''s 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 At Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 5060 1492 1770 5085 A = ;1664 1664 3574 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 5060 1492 1770 5085 _.; 1664 1664 3574 .114 Volume (vph) 0 1741 647 147 1527 0 0 0 570 24 936 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ; Adj. Flow(vph) 0 1741 647 147 1527 0 0 0 570 24 936 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 293 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1741 354 147 1527 0 0 0 297 297 916 Conti. Pads. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1!7. Turn Type Perm Prot Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 ,44� ... 4 4 4 5 :**4 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 59.5 59.5 20.0 66.5 ,i ; ,,,:,-25.5 25.5 43.5 ,-:: ','‘..:4 Effective Green, g (s) 59.5 59.5 20.0 66.5 25.5 25.5 43.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.17 0.55 W " 0.21 0.21 0.36 Clearance Time (s) _ 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2509 740 295 2818 354 354 1296 v/s Ratio Prot ;, ,. c0.34 0.08 c0.30 1 c0.18 0.18 c026 ' - v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 vie Ratio d '4 , e - 0.69 0.48 0.50 0.54 0.84 0.84 0.71 „` Uniform Delay, d1 23.3 20.0 45.4 17.0 45.3 45.3 32.8 Progression Factory 1WW=0.38 0.40 1.05 1.23 i i , 40:,, 1.00 1.00 1.00V ; Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 1.6 0.4 0.7 15.2 15.2 1.5 Delay(s) ., ,y ¢ •'' 10.0 9.6 48.2 21.6 = ,_• 60.5 60.5 34 2 , Level of Service A ADC E E C Approach Delay s 9.9 24.0 0.0 44.4 '„ Approach LOS A C A D a Ifitei'secfiWO :. t ::- :, 7..x a: ilM HCM Average Control Delay 23.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 7 i �; - k ' Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.2% ICU Level of Service Dgu Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Larte Group " °* * Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection :ity Analysis 3058: S 320 St & 1-5 NB Ramp 04/30/2007 t - ,r- .- \, ) 4 , /' _:, EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBL . 'SBR NEL2 NEL NER -_ a Lane Configurations tti r tTi 1I t Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900:-1441, Grade (%) 1% -1% 3% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.86 0.86 0.91 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 t: 0.99 1.00 0.99 ,a,::°. Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 . Frt 1.00 0.85 '``` 0.98 1.00 0.95 A Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow(prot) 4782 1335 4938 1664 1591 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow(perm) 4782 1335 4938 1664 1591 Volume (vph) 0 1615 792 0 1156 208 0 0 581 0 112 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1615 792 0 1156 208 0 0 581 0 112 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 9 0 »»,,, Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1615 792 0 1350 0 0 0 369 315 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Turn Type Free Split Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 . Permitted Phases Free Actuated Green, G (s) 81.1 120.0 81.1 28.9 28.9 � Effective Green, g (s) 81.1 120.0 81.1 28.9 28.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 1.00 3 0.68. 0.24 0.24 . ‘ „ Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 °W''' 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3232 1335 3337 401 383 v/s Ratio Prot 0.34 0.27 ,- .. ; c0.22 0.204,-',.:..' ‘:, , :: v/s Ratio Perm c0.59 v/c Ratio ''`° M 0.50 0.59 t ''- 0.40 _ 0.92 0.82 Uniform Delay, d1 9.5 0.0 8.7 44.4 43.1 Progression Factor:***: 0.28 1.00 ,- 0.77 X 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 1.5 0.3 25.8 12.7 Delay(s) <a 4 3.1 1.5 iii, r 7.0 ,%,-70.2 55.8 t Level of Service A A A E E Approach Delay(s)x�� , ..,,. 2.6 7.0 0.0; ' 63 5 ' ..,; Approach LOS A A A E HCM Average Control Delay 13.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 4 :• 0.68 �_.:=: r ,3 k Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 5.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization ; 74.7%a ICU Level of Service ' Analysis Period (min) 15 �� � � c Critical Lane Group ��, .,,. 4 ter. ,ram t " ,:> q t-3 ., a Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection -pacity Analysis 3060: S 320 St & 32 Ay S 04/30/2007 -"4 --► 4- k- I♦ t \* a/ Movement;- EBL EBB a r� - WBL WBT WBR NBL 'NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations vi 44' r 'fi tT, '1 l:, 4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% 0% -3% 0% Total Lost time(s) goit. 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.81 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt , , 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow(prot) Ar., 1770 3525 1503 1770 3525 1782 1554 1366 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3525 1503 1770 3525 1782 1554 1366 Volume (vph) 4 1558 25 7 1236 0 70 0 11 1 1 3 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 1558 25 7 1236 0 70 0 11 1 1 3 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 4 1558 20 7 1236 0 70 1 0 0 2 0 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Split Split Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 4` -11 Actuated Green, G (s) 1.1 89.2 89.2 2.0 90.1 8.7 8.7 1.1 Effective Green, g (s) 1.1 89.2 89.2 2.0 90.1 8.7 8.7 0.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.01 0.74 0.74 0.02 0.75 0.07 0.07 0.00 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 16 2620 1117 30 2647 129 113 '�- 1 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.44 0.00 c0.35 c0.04 0.00 c0.00 vas Ratio Perm 0.01 ,.t 4 „a ,-..,1,-;.. .:.;.,,.., t � v/c Ratio 0.25 0.59 0.02 0.23 0.47 0.54 0.01 2.00 Uniform Delay, d1 59.0 7.1 4.0 58.2 5.7 53.7 51.6 x ' ,44 Progression Factor 0.97 1.04 1.64 0.71 0.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 0.9 0.0 1.4 0.6 2.5 0.0 ,t Delay(s) 59.7 8.3 6.6 42.7 3.2 56.2 51.7 1578.9 Level of Service E A A D A E D _ ' ';'.. ' Approach Delay (s) 8.4 3.4 55.6 1578.9 Approach LOS f t atM p` :. A . , ; - : 'i.i' HCM AVerade C`ontrd►1Jalay. fi= 10.3 ?' g x 7A ,_ w;7 1 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time(s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 -..: -- >3 � c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Signalized Intersection C :ity Analysis 3061: S 320 St & Weyerhaeuser Wy S 04/30/2007 c 41-- 4\ P f►f' .� , BR VI/Bt. Lane Configurations ff � fT Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 • Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L � Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 "" Satd. Flow(prot) 3525 1507 1770 3525 3320 1386 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3525 1507 167 3525 3320 1386 Volume(vph) 1606 95 259 1119 182 168 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj.Flow(vph) 1606 95 259 1119 182 168 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 32 0 0 22 109 Lane.Graup Flow(vph) 1606 63 259 1119 207 12 Confl. Peds. (ft/hr) 10 10 10 10 Bus"Blockages(#/hr) 2 0 0 2 2 2 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 _ Permitted Phases 2 6 4 Actt.iated Green,G(s). 75.7 - 75.7 97.7 97.7 12.3 12.3 Effective Green, g (s) 75.7 75.7 97.7 97.7 12.3 12.3 Actr tetl,g/C Ratio ` 0.63 • 0.63 0.81 0.81 0:10 0.1 a • 4 . ._ Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle:Extension (s) 2.0 2:Q 2.0 2.0 ' 2.0 2.0 _ . ., • Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2224 951 363 2870 340 142 v/s Ratio Prot 0.46 c0.10 0.32 c0 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.48 0.01 v/c'Ratio' 0.72- 0,07 0.71 _ 0.39 0.61�; Uniform Delay, d1 15.0 8.5 26.3 3.0 51.6 48.8 .0` �` w° c Progresso Factor '0 52�:=� 0.5T � 1.02 • 0.26- 1.00 • 1.00 1�� Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.1 3.9 0.3 2.3 0.1 Delay(s) = _ �� 9,6 4.5 30.8 1.1. 53 8: 48.9 E ,. Level of Service A AC ADD Approach LOS A A D HCM Average Control Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume.to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 480.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Gr , Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 APPENDIX B HCM Signalized Intersection C-_.r_city Analysis 2051: S 304 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 -► c .- k" 4\ 1 t \* ./ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W BR NBL ., NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -4% 5% -1% 2% Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 4;q .,1*-1.00 0.97 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0 -1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.98 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prof) .` 1859 1532 ��a �-,- 1688 1778 4973 1752 4954 Flt Permitted 0.84 1.00 0.78 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1596 1532 1349 1778 4973 1752 4954 Volume (vph) 26 42 38 171 53 59 43 1085 134 52 1481 58 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 26 42 38 171 53 59 43 1085 134 52 1481 58 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 29 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 68 9 0 274 0 43 1210 0 52 1536 0 Confi. Pods. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 6 6 0 2 0 2 0 0 6 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot ', Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green. G (s) 28.9 28.9 28.9 9.0 70.2 6.9 68.1 Effective Green, g(s) fo,fti, 27.9 27.9 *5. 27.9 9.0 70.2 6.9 68.1 a Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.59 0.06 0.57 Clearance Time(s) t : ,. 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5•0 . Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 371 . .366 314 133 2909 101 2811 -„c.:,-: v/s v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.24 0.03 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm - Y: 0.04 '`0.01 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.02 0.87 0.32 0.42 0.51 0.55 Uniform Delay,d1 ; ::36.9 35.5 4f 44.3 52.6,4:13.7 ':',':'',4?-:1' 54.9 16.3 '1; Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.48 0.18 1.49 0.26 Incremental Delay, d2 _ 0.1 0.0 �; 21.7 0.5 0.4 _ 1.7 0.7 ,` Delay(s) 37.0 35.6 63.7 26.0 2.9 83.7 4.9 Level of Service `> . D D "= E C A :.: F A 44; Approach Delay(s) 36.5 63.7 3.7 7.5 APproach LOS `°' D r 1 7 . E A it HCM Average Control Delay 11.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time s - 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) , 1.5 � , .<4 , -. . ,.. _, c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Signalized Intersection ,acity Analysis 2250: S 308 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 t --+► c 4 4\ t t `► 1 -' ' , :, Et t: .: FAT : _. Bt �AA1-BT-t BR a' "�t tat a. ti i :' Y. Lane Configurations 4 44 +f t tti Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 10 Grade(%) 4% 2% 1% -1 Total Lost time;(s) 5.0 i ,- 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 .,.; -:,; Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb,pod. .es 0.99 4 0.98 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00- ,'.`> ,_ Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.95 .. Y.` 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 . Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satci Fkrrot) 166f,r . .4, ; 1644 1761 5024 1778 4974 Flt Permitted 0.70 0.87 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd FldW rearm) 1200 #. - ,:• 1444 1761 5024 1778 4974. Volume (vph) 98 21 66 28 17 66 55 1147 23 33 1568 131 Peak4idkitSdtor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1,00 ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 .Y. BEI Adj. Flow(vph) 98 21 66 28 17 66 55 1147 23 33 1568 131 RTOR Re ktl�(vph) 0 20 0 0 52 0 0 1 0 0 5 Q i Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 165 0 0 59 0 55 1169 0 33 1694 0 Conft 1 x(#ihr) 10 - 10 -; 10 10 10 10 10 ' - 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 8 8 0 2 0 2 0 0 8 0 Turn Type.--- Perm Perm Prot Prot '�,. Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 . Actuated Green, G (s) 18.3 18.3 7.8 82.2 5.5 79.9 Effecttvv atn g(s) 17 3 _. 17.3 - 7 8 . 82�2 , -;z k. ,,- 5.5 :'79 9 GO Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.69 0.05 0.67 Clearart e s) . 4.0 , 4.0 5.0 : .:;5 0 1-4 ` .0 0 !: . Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lade Grp dap(v h) 17 '' •, = �, 114 344,1 81 3312 , v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.23 0.02 c0.34 v/s Rat►G1_t'e rm c01 „ _ -, a#�' v/c Ratio 0.96 0.28 • 0.48 0.34 0.41 0.51 Uniforr>it-t €ay,-d1 51 0 .. .., 5.8 54.2 7 8 55.7 .1 Q 2 _ ,t Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.10 0.83 0.86 0.14 Incremet,Delay,d2 54.6 .A , .,{1 3 1.0 02 1.1 0 5 . . , Delay(s) 105.6 46.1 60.7 6.7 48.9 1.9 Level of Set-Vice; F 04 - .= D, E A D A Approach Delay(s) 105.6 46.1 9.1 2.8 Appr-o `t- S F - D A A " :F CM at a Control Delay =`-`£''2, . '. =-HHCM Level of Service B 7 = H ; HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56 Act iated.Cycle Length(s) 1200. Sum of lost time(s) 10.0 =t ,` Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) .15 . c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection ,Gpacity Analysis 2350: S 310 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 t Movm .WBR. NBT NBR_ SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt' Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 1% 0% Volume (veh/h) 0 74 1098 46 73 1595 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 74 1098 46 73 1595 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) i�12 0 ' ' ' 12.0 , 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage sa ;� .; 1 1 • �. .,. Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) � osfr : '` l° pX, platoon unblocked 0.90 0.88 0.88 vC, conflicting volume .1819 409 wry:= L. vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol z` vCu, unblocked vol 1106 63 908 tC, single (s) f . .., ., 6.8 6.9 O 4-1 • .�,} tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) # ` 3.5 3.3 7 " 2.2 �` w p0 queue free % 100 91 89 cM capacity veh/h 162 857 652, Volume Total 74 439 439 266 73 532 532 532 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 Volume Right ' 74 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 cSH 857 1700 1700 1700 652 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.09 026 0.26 0.16 0.11 0.31 0,31 0,31. ' Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Control Delay s 9,6 0.0 0-0 0.0 11.2 0.0 0,0 0.0 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 9.6 0.Q �:� Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization , 6 ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • • • HCM Signalized Intersection )acity Analysis 2550: S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 I' -+' C ,- t 4 t t j 4l Lane Configurations ' ft 'I ti ++1 tff li Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) • 1% 0%° 0% 0%0 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5:0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb,pedibikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.06 --1'00 1.-.00,1-;;,i--0',9,6 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1<00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 1747 3373 1741 3416 1741 4967 ,.Y 1755-;5058 4.97 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1747 3373 1741 3416 1741 4967 1755' 5058 44Wi, Volume (vph) 250 356 100 147 425 77 329 801 99 167 1061 270 Peak-hour factor;PHF 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00: :1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00: 1.00,-, t00 .-t.ma 1.QQ Adj. Flow(vph) 250 356 100 147 425 77 329 801 99 167 1061 270 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 22 0 0 ' 13 0 ' 0 12 '0- -. ` 0. 0 `-18 Lane Group Flow(vph) 250 434 0 147 489 0 329 888 0 167 1061 84 Confl. Peels. (Mir) 10 10; 10'. 10 10 10< _`10. 440 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Per r_f Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases ? 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.9 26.0 13.5 20.6 25.0 43.5 19.0 37.5 37.5 Effective Green,g(s) 17.9 25.0 12.-5 19 6 25.0 43.5 19E0 37/.,5. YEA Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.21 0.10 0.16 0.21 0.36 0.16 0.31 0.31 Clearance Time.(s) 4.0 '4.0 : 4,0: 4.0' 5,0 S IJ : .; S Q 0- ,5:4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap:(vph) 261 703 , 181. 558- 363 1801 278 , 1581 , v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.13 0.08 c0.14 c0.19 0.18 0.10 c0.21 v/s:> 0 , v/c Ratio 0.96 0.62 0.81 0.88 0.91 0.49 0.60 0.67 0.18 U E 50.7 43.2,_ 52>6 49:0 46:4 29.7 47 0355 9 Progression Factor 1.06 0.68 1.03 0.80 0.61 0.64 1.07 1.08 2.72 Incremental Delay,d2 W42.9 1.1 222 140 22.5 0.9 2.2-., ,2 0..- ):7 Delay(s) 96.5 30.5 76.3 53.0 50.7 20.0 52.7 40.7 82.4 Level of Service F C E ;D- D C. D: P Approach Delay(s) 53.9 58.3 28.2 49.5 Approach LOS D E' C' D c . G {'9 j,__ f :. &% tE'nc'S�C`j"ri•,..s ai 3..' .c: ',J.a3 :'c$` " lt,.. ae ` `t$,5:L,':..., HCM Aveia0e Coi'trot Delay 45.3 .HCM`Level of Service '°D F ,.'. F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length.(s) 120,0;' . -Surn of lost time(s) 20;0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15,. c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 f 4- k- 4\ 1 t \ 'I ' ate Lane Configurations ) k ' '� f�� ,� 444+1 ideal°Ftiripl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% -2% Totat LO$4 (a.}; 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb 11';' ..5, 1.00 0.99 1:00 098 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.92 1:00 0:91 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Sabi.F f l ) 1762 1707 1730. 1677 1752 4883 1787 5052 '_ Fit Permitted 0.58 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Sam. .-��_ 1073 1707 414 ', 1677.. ,. 1752 4883 1787 5052 ?`; Volume(vph) 107 87 99 206 84 112 167 1126 193 107 1290 70 Peak r o PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00• 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.:00 100 1:00 1.00 1.1 s! 00 Adj. Flow(vph) 107 87 99 206 84 112 167 1126 193 107 1290 70 RTO , C ' ` 'y 0 39 0 0''' 46 0- 0 15- 0 0 _ 1, Lane Group Flow(vph) 107 147 0 206 150 0 167 1304 0 107 1356 0 ) 10 10 10' 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 4 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 Turn Type- ' pm+pt pm+pt Prot Prot "`:l'_ ,Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Kr'i: " 1 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.3 14.9 33.3 20.9 21.0 62.3 10.4 51.7 E€fe i ' ley: 21:3 13.9 32:3"' "19:9' 21.0 62.3 10.4 51 7 +,. Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.12 0.27 0.17 0.18 0.52 0.09 0.43 Gt€ 1 t-,! > ' 4.0 4.0 -.-4.0.-- 4-ft` 5- 5:f1=" , „' Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 .. 5 259 Z ' 307 2535 5 �Cart lit ) 233 190 x , . # ,--,• •- - v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.09 c0.09 0.09 0.10 c0.27 0.06 c0.27 v/s R _ m, :- 0.05 .�� : _ y _ - ,, �� ,,,i 6 ,,, , �. v/c Ratio 0.46 0.74 0.80 0.54 0.54 0:51 0.69 0.62 U ifot t* �d1 43'2 ' 53 ` 0 `, Progression Factor" 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.76 0.69 0.43 1.06 0.36 a,. 8 4 1 Incr �tf:�1;106fa�yr �,� : 0.5_ 't; l .�, . x �: -1_ ..� , Delay(s) 43.7 63.7 45.0 35.8 32.0 8.5 64.8 10.8 :Leve oirce D e. a ' - - �_ 1 ; . E 1a Y Approach Delay(s) 56.4 40.5 11.2 14.7 : _CM v � tetay � HOW s , q# B .-& ,� HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Acttiated;4 e.t ength;(s) 121 "-y- ..""Stint.t �, 23� 10:0 -� s r Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service D Anae J''' r s ` � Y44* Y 3 r� " 9. c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Signalized Intersection pacity Analysis 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 t --. C ♦- k" 4\ t t \* 1 1 g 7 *A t F . .' ;, :, . : -. a .�.i. SB(_ SKIT Lane Configurations A) itt Ali +f t ff A) ,�,�t, A) TTT r IdeatFt ) , 1:4-t. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) -6% 0% 2% _2% Totat 5.0 5.0 5 0 . 5.0 5.0 5.0. . &0 5.0 5.0 5:0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.61 0.97 0.91 1.00 FrpbY _ 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt-,:-.1 1',,:,„, 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 .0 9i=- 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 S h i3522 5119 3433 5045 1536 3358 4Z 3426 5136 1522 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1-00 1.00 Ski . ,Y- ::3522 5119 343 : 5045 1536 3358 4832 3426 5136 1522 Volume(vph) 458 886 82 377 991 296 237 839 234 335 889 322 Peatf( ,1„ , . :ii;.;i ;"t:.BO • 1.00 1 0O ;3 ....00 1.00 100 1-. �' 100 1.00 1.00 1-:,00 Adj. Flow(vph) 458 886 82 377 991 296 237 839 234 335 889 322 RTOR OiAlVh} 0 8 ;: '��,�� �: 0 172 . 0 . 43 0 0 0 233 Lane Group Flow(vph) 458 960 0 377 991 124 237 1030 0 335 889 89 Conft P' 10 10'` 10 1t3., 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type"` -: Prot , �: Perm Prof - Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Per rnttted -teases:. .� F .ff'' . ,., 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 42.3 14.7 37.0 37.0 12.2 28.3 14.7 30.8 30.8 ,0* Eff ( ; <" 20.0 42.3 3 - i4 14.7 30.8 ,30:8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.35 0.12 0 31 0.31 0.10 0.24 0.12 0.26 0.26 Cteat<an �4 � ; 5 0 5.0- v s v. r 1 4415.0 5.0 -_5:0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane G P( t) 51177" $, v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.19 c0.11 c0.20 0.07 c0.21 c0.10 0.17 vrs--I P m i ro E .' i _ ..u ; 0;06 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.53 0.90 0.64 0.26 0.70 0.90 0.80 0.67 0.23 Un nn y,d1 ;_ :47:9 31 _ 512- 40:1 352 Progression Factor 0.54 0.35 0.75 0.66 0 81 0.66 0.55 0.61 0.50 0.45 Incr ent lWetay °4 4 0.8 ,§ ,._ 7.6° 0.9 01 Delay(s) 30.3 11.8 56 0 25-2 26.3 37.7 31.4 38.6 21.1 16.0 tt C ,..B Level of ,, a, ,M, Approach Delay(s) 17.7 32.4 32.5 23.8 Appro�I ( , g �_ F - HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 ' Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.2%Y ICU Level of Service ) Actuate s , - .:� Arratys<r 1 n) ' Wit" =y..,, R - £ `I V. ` � f E _1Z c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection C..,__city Analysis 3350: S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 ,-Si ,i. . �.: BT EBR W BE_ WU... wBR . ,NBL NBT NBR sB Gm 1:i. Lane Configurations ii + r 'pi I +f 1+ ++1* Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1% 1% 01% 0% Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 ' 44 Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98: 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1778 1812 1500 3361 + 1186 55 4934 1713 4943 $ _, ) Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 1778 1812 1500 3361 1786- 1755 4934 1713 4943 Volume (vph) 196 207 208 328 250 49 267 1186 234 184 1128 122 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00< 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 196 207 208 328 250 49 267 1186 234 184 1128 122 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 170 0 6 0 0 21 0 0 10 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 196 207 38 328 293 0 267 1399 0 184 1240 0 Confl..Pegs::(#/hr); 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 8 8 2 0 2 0 8 8 8 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot . Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.9 22.7 22.7 15.4 23.2 24.0 47.1 15.8 38.9 Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 22.2 22.2 14.9 22.7 24.0 47.1 15.8- 38 9 . Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.19 0.20 0.39 0.13 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 - 5.0 5.0 ' ,::-..- Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 213 335 278 417 338 351 193.7 " 43 1_ , v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.11 0.10 c0.16 0.15 c0.28 0.11 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm ` -;0.03 x•. , _ Kw v/c Ratio 0.92 0.62 0.14 0.79 0.87 0.76 0.72 0.81 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 # 52.2 45.0 40.9 51.0 47.2 ; 45.3 30.9 .41,:50.7 36.6 = Progression Factor 0.72 0.68 0.63 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.61 0.79 0.46 Incremental Delay, d2 36 7 * -2.1 0.1 8.7 19.4 i, . '8.1 2.3 . 14.5 2.8 , Delay(s) 74.3 32.6 25.7 59.8 66.6 40.6 21.2 54.6 19.6 Level of Service L a E C C a, E E ..;,.; D C D B Approach Delay (s) 43.6 63.0 24.3 24.1 Approach LOS ** . ;. D . ,As. E::.. . :. .: . C . . _', C ,A ..... a .. NM- 'Me a Control"C efay 32.5 HCM Level efService C s nos, HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 , , = Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period_(min) 15 .,. . + r 1,',�� . c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersectio apacity Analysis 3550: S 328 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ttt T+1 Sign Control Stop Free Free 4g fi%': Grade 0% 0% -2% Volume (veh/h) 0 91 0 1689 1917 74 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 91 0 1689 1917 74� ;: �.. . Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 11t . - Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal(ft) 641 pX, platoon unblocked 0.85 vC, conflicting volume 2537 696 2001 . .... a . k . • vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1964 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 573 . E vCu, unblocked vol 2455 696 2001 tC, single(s) � 6.8 6.9 4.1 r .. tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 76 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 80 378 280 Volume Total 91 563 563 563 767 767 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... . .. ..:_ ` Volume Right 91 0 0 0 0 0 74 t :*1 W ' . cSH 378 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.45 0.45 0.27 x Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 17.5 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay(s) 1 :17.5 0.0 0.0 ;. . ., Approach LOS C O �trnary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization - 55.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection C_r_city Analysis 3650: S 330 St & Pacific` Hwy S 04/30/2007 -T - -r c 4- *'- 4\ t itfr \* / 4' f; k .,YM .:EBT EBR WBL WBT ,WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL, -SBT" SBR Lane Configurations ' h ttl 441 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -4% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 = "k- 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 ft 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 . 0.88 1.00 0.87 1f' 1.00 0.99 = 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said_ Flow(prot) 1737 1628 1689 1573 1752 4951 1787 5067 Flt Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 1314 1628 1292 1573 ' 1752 4951 1787 5067 Volume (vph) 72 8 38 22 6 53 138 1231 51 202 1539 21 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 72 8 38 22 6 53 138 1231 51 202 1539 21 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 35 0 0 49 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 72 11 0 22 10 0 138 1279 0 202 1559 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 8 8 0 6 0 6 0 0 8 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 13.0 64.9 30.1 82.0 Effective Green, g(s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 13.0 64.9 30.1 82 0 . - Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.54 0.25 0.68 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 0 = Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap,(vph) . 110 136 198, 131,: 190 2678 ;,, : 448 3462 ,# ': v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.01 c0.08 c0.26 0.11 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 _ 0:02 - 4' v/c Ratio 0.65 0.08 0.20 0.08 0.73 0.48 0.45 0.45 Uniform Delay, d1 53.3..3,,50.0 51t.3.:‘` .ate.., , .;' 51.8 '` 17.1 , 8 0 8 7 �y g Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 0.59 0.45 Incremental Delay,d2 10 2 0f:',-..,0.1 : ' 0.3 t 11.1rr. 0.6 _ 0.2 0.4 '` Delay(s) 63.5 50.9 51.6 50.8 62.7 18.1 22.8 4.3 Level of Service E D �miii t � ":D:; 4i,ate. ! � ;, ;1, A Approach Delay(s) 58.6 51.1 22.4 6.4 Approach LOS E ,'4 4'"' x ' ' Al �f 4 ,4- �� ��^�& .ate �s � : ;a', - liCM Average Control t*ay. ':. 16-0 HCM ,eve(£o,Servic+ > x 0" . w. 4. . HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49 Actuated Cycle Length"(s}._ ; 120.0 Sum of lost time(s) 3 t `' Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Per'' , : 15 rq '" c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersectio.. _;apacity Analysis 3750: S 332 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 4\ t Lane Configurations r A tt +Tl Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 2% -2% Volume(ueh/h) : 0 0 0 1694 1888 0 ,; a .. ,e Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Haurty 1fowfate l�vph)` 0 0 0 1694 1888 04'4-; x �> Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) #` Right turn flare(veh) M None �. max" _�� � Median storage �{veh) pX, platoon unblocked 0.86 0.86 0.86 vc iicting volume 2453 629 • fi b vC1, stage 1 conf vol 4C2 staige:Zcgrtf vol 4 w _ vCu, unblocked vol 2365 248 1709 tfi ;'.� . _ s)"° 68 6.9 4.1P . tC,2 stage(s) tl .. .' ... 3 5 3.3 2.2 .}., ,3; , ' •.„ p0 queue free% 100 100 100 ) 25 648 317 <s�a. 1%alime fio 0 0" 565 565 565 755 755 378 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.44 0.44 0.22 3` � ' Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C i ' ay(s)., 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 : 0.0 0.0 n �r . Lane LOS A 0.0 0.0 > s ;° 0.0: _ 4 s Approach LOS A intersgtfcif Sirimary Average Delay 0.0 lnters ioj Capacity Utilization .;. 40.6% ICU Level of Service °. A Analysis Period (min) 15 �g . Gaza; Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection —pacity Analysis 3850: S 333 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 M■� ��y g`,. .� ..XX2 `' ',. t �, k �3.0 zz ��.,�� f ._ .., 'f h .&, .# y�CM-e '1. ,. ov+rAss�'..; 'X.. „vs,.,s.w f xc ...>..a>u... Lane Configurations j 141* ++1. Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade -2% 2% -2% Volume(veh/h) 0 15 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate"(vph) eilpf '. '4.`` • � ' . Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width(ft} 12:4 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Block 1a.' Right turn flare (veh) Median type 1r .., ' .. ., . Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal(ft) : F= _ �... .. pX, platoon unblocked 0.88 0.81 0.81 vC, conflicting urcrte x ~j vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1648 vC2, stage 2 confvol vCu, unblocked vol 2032 5 1339 tC,single(s) 6.8 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 ; � p0 queue free % 100 98 100 cM capacity(vehlh) :. Volume Total• £x a a g e s# r: ''t6 9r ry r �n Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right cSH 859 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) a . �. .. .. .3,.. Lane LOS A Approach Delay : 9 h� Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilizer, ' � ? Analysis Period (min) 15 'Fat"'.�'�i' Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection .)acity Analysis 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL - WBT WBR NBL NBT .-NPR-. SBL SBT SBA Lane Configurations ) + r ii. ti WI il a ttt r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 1% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 ' 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1718 1853 1502 1717 3289 3368 4872 1796 5120 1556 Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.18 1 00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 302 1853 1502 332 3289 3368 4872 1796 5120 1556 Volume (vph) 268 427 402 191 391 223 269 1088 131 156 1309 262 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Flow (vph) 268 427 402 191 391 223 269 1088 131 156 1309 262 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 194 0 72 0 0 11 0 0 0 68 Lane Group Flow (vph) 268 427 208 191 542 0 269 1208 0 156 1309 194 Confi. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 48.4 32.3 32.3 39.8 28.0 12.9 43.0 12.9 43.0 59.1 Effective Green, g (s) 48.4 32.3 32.3 39.8 28.0 1. 12.9 43.0 12.9 43.0 59.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.27 0.27 0.33 0.23 0.11 0.36 0.11 0.36 0.49 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 _ ;- 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 312 499 404 246 767 P 362 1746 193 1835 766 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.23 0.08 0.16 0.08 0.25 c0.09 c0.26 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 0.14 0.18 i.' =, 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.86 0.52 0.78 0.71 0.74 0.69 0.81 0.71 0.25 Uniform Delay, di 27.7 41.6 37.2 31.8 42.2 51.9 32.8 * ` 52.3 33.2 17.7 Progression Factor 0.86 0.90 0.82 0.59 0.71 0.95 0.71 1.01 1.01 0.96 Incremental Delay, d2 17.9 11.8 0.4 7.4 1.3 `-,,,:',1 ;- 7.0 2.3Ti*, 20.4 2.4 0.1 Delay(s) 41.8 49.2 30.9 26.1 31.4 56.2 25.7 73.0 35.9 17.0 Level of Service D D C C C Approach Delay (s) 40.7 30.2 31.2 36.4 Approach LOS D A T C; ` ..4.._"7*-_. c 7. . A ''D Iptersectiori-Sumi;rt __... ...t HCM Average Control Delay 34.8,w HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) �`, ,�'20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 151 ''' � t . p c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection C_.„._.city Analysis 3025: SW 320 St & 26 Av SW 04/30/2007 '' -* - 'r C .- k` 4\ t P \' / 1 Movement: .. . .. ESL EBT EBR WBL tT#14Y-4r R NBL NBT NBR <:;SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations h 44 ) Ii I ) i Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% -1% -4% 3% Total Lost time (s). ,, ,: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0.: =. 5.0 5.0 :"r 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bike 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00�i. 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Fipb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fir, 1.00 0.89 -' 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1744 3504 1739 3527> /`' 1749 1658 1702 1608 Fit Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.75 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 464 3504 786 3527 1363 1658 1349 1608 Volume (vph) 6 582 8 122 1078 12 69 2 5 17 8 18 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 6 582 8 122 1078 12 69 2 5 17 8 18 RTOR Reduction(vph) > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 17 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 6 590 0 122 1090 0 69 2 0 17 9 0 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 ;, 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 1 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 Turn Type Perm Perm ms , ,;' Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 '4' E` 4 �_� Actuated Green, G (s) 101.6 101 6 101.6 101.6 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 Effective Green,g(s) 101.6 101.6 101.6 101.6'' _ 8.4. ` 8.4 f; 8.4 8.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ,. r�.,-4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ',',2„,,,'„'„..;.,.. Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 393 2967 665 2986 95 116 94 113 v/s Ratio Prot 0.17 c0.31 0.00 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.16 , §t'`'' c0.05 �kr :. O_'0.01 _. . v/c Ratio 0.02 0.20 0.18 0.36 0.73 0.02 0.18 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 1.4 1.7 li 1.7 2.0= 1- 1 54.7 ` 52.0 44, '''-`52.6 52 2 �,: Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.18 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.2 iicr4i4r-'' ' 0.2 0.1 f:; 20.7 0.0 ,, 0.3 0.1 Delay(s) 1.5 1.8 0.5 0.4 75.3 52.0 52.9 52.3 Level of Service A A A A E D D D Approach Delay(s) 1.8 0.5 73.2 52.5 Approach L4S . _.: A 4: :'� k- ,. D I HCM Average Control Delay 4.9 HCM;Level of Service . -,- A ;. FICM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39 Actuated Cycle Length (s) � 120.0 Sum of lost time(s) `; ��� ,���� �,�`� � � ; Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) . u 15 ., .. w r° ._.. .T xe _,., c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection acity Analysis 3028: SW 320 St & 21 Ay SW 04/30/2007 s -# c t 4\ t P \. 1 1 Movi3rnent: ' l= ;' ` k EBR WBL °'';. ?X f14 :, SBR. Lane Configurations ' ft+ VI ti 11 t r ) Tl Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - .-, 1 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 . " Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3386 3412 3434 1748 1863 1530 1750 3280 Flt Permitted 0.95 1,00 0.95 1.00 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3386 3412 3434 146 1863 1530 747 3280 Volume (vph) 172 404 112 433 758 100 ,`180 408 267 81 707` 423 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 172 404 112 433 758 100.; .180 408 267 81 707 423 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 8 0 0 0 90 0 72 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 172 496 0 433 850 0 2 ;180 408 177 81 1058 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 3 3 3 0 3 0 2 2 3 3 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 B 7 4 5 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.4 25.7 18.4 30.7 `° ,- 60.9 50.6 69.0 50.7 45.4 Effective Green, g (s) 13.4 25.7 18.4 30.7 60.9 50.6 69.0 50.7 45.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.21 0.15 0.26' , ' 0.51 0.42 0.58 0.42 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 "-r: 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 198 725 523 879 214 786 944 360 1241 v/s Ratio Prot A .,. c0.10 0.15 0.13 c0.25 c0.07 0.22 0.03 0.01 0.32 v/s Ratio Perm c0.35 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.68 0.83 0.97`' 0.84 0.52 Y;0.19 0.23 0.85 Uniform Delay, d1 52.4 43.4 49.3 44.1 29.8 25.7 12.1 21.4 34.2 Progression Factor 0.97 0.96 : 1.00 1.00 1.21 0.87 .0.46 0.48 0.70 Incremental Delay, d2 29.7 2.1 9.9 22.2 23.7 2.4 0.0 0.1 6.7 Delay(s) 80.6 44.0 4.-.,..,„, 59.2 66.4 59.6 24.8 5.7 10.4 30.6 Level of Service F D E E E C A B C Approach Delay(s) 53.1 64.0 .,„ . _ 26.2 ,n "'' „ ri 29.2 Approach LOS D E C C Intersect oa Surnrn"= ,::; HCM Average Control Delay 43.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio ; m. 0.86 . . ' ,Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization _;4: 93.9% ICU Level of Service 4 ,F 3i `; Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ;= W • .3 . i f s Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection __pacity Analysis 3031: SW 320 St & 14 Wy SW 04/30/2007 t 4--- to 4 fu1L�Vet .. EBL EBT Lane Configurations tT +i+ V Sign Control Free Free Stop • .. • Grade 0% 0% 2% Volume(veh/h) 32 994 1630 28 16 25 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate,(vph) 32 994 1630 28 16 k 25 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 • Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage • 1 1 1 ry Right turn flare (veh) Median type VtE .7. 4� TWLTL Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal(ft) ;" ' i pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1668 2225 849 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1654 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 1 571 vCu, unblocked vol 1668 2225 849 tC, single (s) 4 1 6.8 6.9 ,,,` $ ` . , ,V 'is .. ;: tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) :� 2 2 3.5 3.3_ a , p0 queue free % 92 85 92 ,_ :, .. cM capacity(veh/h) 378-* w Volume Total 32 497 497 1087 571 41 Volume Left 32 0 0 0 0 16 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 28 25 t3'3 cSH 378 1700 1700 1700 1700 178 Volume to Capacity, .0.0821f 0.29 0.29 0.64 0.34 0.23 ' -s i Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 0 0 0 0 21 _ Control Delay(s) 4 '``0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.3 Lane LOS C D Approach Delays)rt 0 5 0.0 31.3 •' � ,..:. �a pp ( ..... Approach LOS D Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ICU Level of Service M Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersecti rapacity Analysis 3032: SW 320 St & 13 PI SW 04/30/2007 c ~ .F- Lane Configurations ft* I 44 f _�. Sign Control _ Free Free- Stop = Grade 1% -1% 2% Volume.( eti/h) 885 11 95: 1 0- 4 - < �¢ 4, , Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,ul. yam..,.rph)Ffvtate-(v 885 11 1�5` 1 _• 4 *-<° �� 434 ' f tt- ,` Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Wtd t;(ft) 12.0 . 12.0 12.6 : , T„ -. �, 4, 7. . 0. . . . Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Pe4nt0ockage 1 I:;,. 1. ='-'f`. }. ,° ,; , Right turn flare(veh) Medtan „e Median storage veh) 1 Upstrearrz signal:(ft) * , - . - 0 pX, platoon unblocked vC;`cr fti t r€ lime .. . .... ~ . x. ... . h.. ,. �, ° �- _L.. vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 900 vC2;stage;'2-cortf vol 7, ; �: � , . r� � ..a ' vCu, unblocked vol 906: 1940 468 tC,single°(s) 4 1,,, =6:8 6:9 -r` V r 4 ' tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 % p0 queue free ° 87 97 88 u . • V " -' :::Total 690 - g a .""-�3 e , . s?s 3 • �� i 3 ya' 's , ,: Volume Left 0 0 95 0 0 4 Volume Right 0 11 0 cSH 1700 1700 740 1700 1700 467 Volume to Capacity 0.35 0.18 0.13 0.49 tk 4 x ;_ 7 � Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 11 0 0 12 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0‘k O(1 ," � �� ' =t Lane LOS B B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.6 : ..,. . i., -* **,.z ., . Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.7 Intersection peOacity Utilizat Analysis Period (min) 15 Iy .. -' 7-''''',.'4,.`5h. :�'"�try ��'�-��'{., <a .a - .W4 ZTM'.Yv_a, ...*A Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection rapacity Analysis 3033: SW 320 St & 11 PI SW 04/30/2007 W.:0*ot-<- , EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL Lane Configurations fit '''( Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 1% -1`)/0 -13% Volume(veh/h) 887 0 0 1604 0 0 : Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate(vph) 887 0 0 1604 0 0 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 if 12.0 120t ;,° . > Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) • Median type r w Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1709 464 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 897 vC2, stage 2 conf vol fig 812 � . ✓ .. '. . .. n.. . vCu, unblocked vol 897 1709 464 tC, single(s) n a yy 4.1 6,8 6.94., tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) • .. . 44. 2,2 3.5 t =;3. p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 746, 209 537 ,. voitirii4Toll 591 296 0 802 . . Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.35 0.17 0,00 0.47 0.47 0 00 � ,��, 3,� �� Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) .`" :. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a l Lane LOS A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 =0.0 � , 44 Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 4,41. 58.8% :' . ; ICU Level of Service B p Analysis Period (min) 15 • '-`'-.f ., P... .f''�`;� � °..� k A _n. Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersectio _apacity Analysis 3034: SW 320 St & 10 PI SW 04/30/2007 N Lane Configurations ft ft+ ►j► o1 Free;„:„: Fr+ a Stop • :'.. .. Grade 0% -1`)/0 0% 4101h) 40 kw . $ , '55 31 20(k�' Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .. cate-(vph) 40 t4O7' ='t =x 55 31 20Q41k. * Pedestrians 10 10 10 L:*** `(ft) 12 ':,'. 1 ,, 12.0 x ry 3 ..z`� Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Right turn flare (veh) E;� 0400': ' • _;�� y.��.�,� ��'tA " '.pax , 4 6 P x Median storage veh) gq 1 a;. 4,-ftai•(ft) • pX, platoon unblocked a. v Ath j-;volume 1664 7:,10 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1636 vnf vol rt vCu, unblocked vol 1664 2430 847 tG stngte;(s) 4.12 ,,.,. . v � . z. -49014.4111% tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 p0 queue free% 89 70 33 # th) : :.. . Vo)ume I i tal 4t) 704 704: 16Ei "' 5$ 23 Volume Left 40 0 0 0 0 31 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 55 200 cSH 379 1700 1700 1700 1700 238 Volume to Capacity .0.11 0.41 0.41 0.63 0.35 sit ' x Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 0 0 0 222 ContrtttOelay(s) 15.6 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 95.1 Lane LOS C F Approach Delay(s) 0.4 0.0 95.1 1"a. Approach LOS F Average Delay 6.8 Analysis Period (min) 15 Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG,or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection rapacity Analysis 3036: SW 320 St & 7 Av SW 04/30/2007 y e Lane Configurations ' 4'j' ft Sign,Cct1': Free . Free' Stop Grade 0% 0% 1% Vol -(4 5 859 1474; 30 14 5 _" Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 "".... 5 859 1474 30 14 5 ' Pedestrians 10 10 10 La : y. :' }. 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Per .,.�' 1 k; i - Right turn flare(veh) .j Median storage veh) 1 pX, platoon unblocked e 1514 • 1948 or , vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1499 vCu, unblocked vol 1514 1948 772 tC,s( ) *. 4.1 '' 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage(s) 5.8 tF (s) . . 2.2 '�'- � �',�� _� 3.5 3.3: '� ... p0 queue free % 99 90 99 ) 434 137, 336: 5 430 430 983 521 Volume Left 5 0 0 0 0 14 Volume Rig2ht 0 0 0 0 30 :,; 5 cSH 434 1700 1700 1700 1700 162 Volume r ity 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.58 0.31 0.12 t; ` Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0 10 Control Delay(s) 13.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.2 _ Lane LOS B D Approach Delay(s)`° 0.1 ,.. 0.0 30.2.. 4 Approach LOS D mart'„ =< � �'r �sx�:' �� _.s�.n_, Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 tx 5.. .',�t. u.� � °i • Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersectior apacity Analysis 3037: SW 320 St & 6 PI SW 04/30/2007 C ~ 4\ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations +' Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade -2% 2% -1 Volume (veh/h) 1050 24 100 1683 17 71 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1050 24 100 1683 17 71 O <, Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 ;t Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 ,: '; .r 1 1 �� .t= • Right turn flare (veh) 4 Median type .,_7 TWLTL � .,k " Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal (ft).:._ ., pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume • 1084 " _ 2124 557`4 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1072 vC2, stage 2 conf vol :. 1052 T. .� '1 , vCu, unblocked vol • 1084 2124 557 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) a:: 2.2 3.5 p0 queue free % 84 88 85 cM capacity(vehlh) �� a 634 138 466 Volume Total 700 -v3�4 Volume Left 0 0 100 0 0 17 Volume Right 0 24 0 0 0 71 "` cSH 1700 1700 634 1700 1700 578 Volume to Capacity 0.41 0.22 0.16 0.49 0.49 0.15 14 :- Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 14 0 0 13 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 18.1 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay s 0.0 0.7 x 18.1 Approach LOS C Average Delay 0.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.0% ` ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Ky Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Ay S 04/30/2007 Movement e IBL; EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations VI ti 'I) Tt r » ++ r » +4, r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -1% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3347 3323 3436 3528 1497 3423 3557 1534 3383 3507 1495 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3347 3323 3436 3528 1497 581 3557 1534 879 3507 1495 Volume (vph) 141 817 154 397 1347 238 349 519 311 199 605 191 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 141 817 154 397 1347 238 349 519 311 199 605 191 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 12 0 0 0 103 0 0 40 0 0 139 Lane Group Flow (vph) 141 959 0 397 1347 135 349 519 271 199 605 52 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.8 47.4 18.8 57.4 57.4 34.8 24.8 43.6 32.8 23.8 23.8 Effective Green, g (s) 8.8 47.4 18.8 57.4 57.4 34.8 24.8 43.6 32.8 23.8 23.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.39 0.16 0.48 0.48 0.29 0.21 0.36 0.27 0.20 0.20 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 245 1313 538 1688 716 405 735 557 428 690.: 297 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.29 c0.12 c0.38 c0.07 0.15 0.08 0.03 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm i r, . ,i O , 0.09 c0.18 0.10 0.09 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.73 0.74 0.80 0.19 0.86 0.71 0.49 0.46 0.87 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 53.8 30.9 48.3 26.4 17.9 35.1 44.2 29.5 34.2 46.6 39.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.30 0 07 0.88 0.92 0.69 1.00 '1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 3.6 :‘ l'-'7a 2.9 2.6 0.4 15.6 2.4 0.2 0.3 10.9 0,1 Delay (s) 55.8 34.5 39.5 '10.6 1.5 46.5 43.2 20.6 34.5 57.5 40.0 Level of Service E C D B A D D C C E D Approach Delay(s) 37.2 15.3 38.2 49.5 ApproachLQS.. ,4, _: D . .$.ha.u,.,...... ,. .... . .. D D Ititar% r .:. .4 a ... . Z M . , e -1 HCM Average Control Delay 31.5 HCM Level of Service rO ;,,, C I-1CM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time(s) 10.0 _ `):4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) �, ,. 15 • ;." 4 �� , c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 ' HCM Unsignalized Intersectio apacity Analysis 3043: S 320 St & 5 Ay S 04/30/2007 --► --st 4-- 4\ Movement EBT., EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tti, ttt 1 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 1% -2% 2% Volume(veh/h) 1554 25 129 2159 10 89 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1554 25 129 2159 10', '.89: Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 ` Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 4,. 1 a a ga'. Right turn flare (veh) Median type ;_- TW t i z >'4..^Fi.Sr „>a, .. -v a:3b. ' ,.£ - S...s��x�..-�sk 0 i:$t. Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal (ft) ` 4 y- ,. 1157 .. : E z. pX, platoon unblocked 0.64 vC, conflicting volume i' ,'W „ ,,>,., 1589 2564 550 ' a=7 ..,{ vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 1576 vC2, stage 2 conf vol ? =� E ', 988 �' « , .�j. 7A1 ' , 4 vCu, unblocked vol 1589 2322 550 tC, single(s) :., 4.1 6.8 6.9 :4`,14 >r l tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 4 . . rh-t i . ;� „ � 2.2 3.5 3.3 .3 I 3 x _;. p0 queue free % 68 91 81 .t cM capacity(veh/h) , >. 406 109 470 -..,., .. .. xii. - B1. ��l,8:2 Vo'rr°y oi `.. 336 129 7 _1f xitt ' 89k , a Volume Left 0 0 0 129 0 0 0 10 0 Volume Right '°. 0 ' 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 89 cSH 1700 1700 1700 406 1700 1700 1700 109 470 Volume to Capacity 0 37 ;:0.37 0.20 0.32 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.09 0.19 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 7 17 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 41.3 14.4 .. Lane LOS C E B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 1.0 17.1 1,,.: ': ',* Approach LOS C lbt __.... . mom. i . Zhi .I> .. , ,,_,.........�.a _ Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization °`31. ;; 58.7% ICU Level of Service B `s; - , , Analysis Period (min) 15 Z S 8 a , ,ti1 g f .Ag £ t ,.:-:17:;.: 7 'i- Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3046: S 320 St & 8 Av S 04/30/2007 -. - ' C '~ A- 4\ t /* \* l d Mp neff,4*4: ';- _..,kic EBT EBR WBLL_..WBT , z,NBL NBT NBR _ SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations A tti A tTl 4+ 4+ Ideal Flow(vphpt) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% -4% 2% -2% Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00" �,:;, 0.98 _; < 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Fri 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99`, .#.'r , _ 0.93 ; ,, '` 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.97 Satd. Flow(prot) 1720 4948 1805 5076: `� ; -` 1658 . .1,,„..:,. . 1716 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 0.79 Satd. Flow(perm) 1720 4948 1805 5076 1597 1397 Volume (vph) 38 1398 12 26 2070 141 10 22 33 120 19 54 Peak-hourfactor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 38 1398 12 262070 141 10 22 33 120 19 54 RTOR Redut lion.(vph) 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 23 0 0 10 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 38 1409 0 26 2205 0 0 42 0 0 183 0 Confl..Peds ,(#/hr)= 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 'l4 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 4 0 0 6 2 6 2 4 4 0 6 Turn Type ' Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases ,,f-its,* 2 :0, .;r :;: 6 LW Actuated Green, G (s) 5.0 64.3 4.3 62.6 38.4 37.4 s 5.0 63.3 4.3 62.6 37.4 w 37.4 �w, Effective G,f,, elf,g:{.) .,,,, „. _ o, ,._, :4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.53 0.04 0.52 0.31 0.31 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 ' Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane.Grp.Cap(vph)4, 72 2610 ._., 65 2648 _ .� ,�; ,«,,, 498 435 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.28 0.01 c0.43 y .� s _ _, ¢ _ . 0.03 :,,t c0.13 ., v/c Ratio 0.53 0.54 0.40 0.83 0.08 0.42 Unifea Del, d. ` ., A56:3, 18.7 56.6 2 X'°' , e ,, 29.2 S 32 7 Progression Factor 1.21 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 Incremental Delay, d2 2.8 0.7 t 1:5 2.3 , ,. ,A;: 0.3 , $,# 0.2 x Delay(s) 71.0 16.4 58.1 26.6 29.5 34.8 Level of Service E B E C . A....3' C C ` t Approach Delay(s) 17.8 27.0 29.5 34.8 Approach LOS B : G= HCM'Average Control Delay 24,0 HCM Level of`Service'; til. , <., i., HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) tfi ::,, V Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Periodjmin) 15 _h �r .ice 4....:: " „ . _ c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersectii :apacity Analysis 3047: S 320 St & 10 Av S 04/30/2007 --► { 4\ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR _ , Lane Configurations +T1 ill r Sign Control Free Free Stop .' lk ,. Grade 2% -4% 0% Volume(veh/h) 1401 0 0 1470 0 0 Syr :.� >_ Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate(vph) 1401 0 , 0 1470 0 0 ,;; -Q. • a 0;:5 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 ": 12.0 12.0 Ws*` Ir.,.$ .,,.r -,'!,,-.0.-- 44?'1, i,' Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 k; ', 1 1 :t >s V zs -a% Right turn flare (veh) Median typed TWLTL = , ; Median storage veh) 1 . Upstream signal(ft) 520 pX, platoon unblocked 0.83 0.91 0.83 vC, conflicting volume ' '_ ..-: _ 1911 48 � ' !. . ,�.„. , € a ..; tlig," ._. vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1411 vC2, stage 2 conf vol ",, ',IX, T 500 =- .10 a,‘ t vCu, unblocked vol 1075 968 0 tC, single(s) ,may , :".x ;"M, 4.1 6.8 6.9,E .,. R Y - "-. tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF(s) 2.2 3,5 3.3 .� =' i p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity(vehlh); . 527 ,>r w,. .- 216 88€k , __ g� o O. Volume Total 560 560 280 0' 49r ""..._-4 ; `'9' r , -,�'xo...., ,4 k Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume_Right. . .. "!_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 • ,.j . . ,, a cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity'''" 0.33 0.33 0.16 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.00 ;, Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0`TP.0.0 0.0 0.0 f t Lane LOS A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 l ..'� ,. °:;,; 0.0 _ ° -, . Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.9% .� ' '' '` '" w p y ICU Level of Service � Analysis Period (min) 15 ti,.;,, . , '°,` o- -:- ..� .. .fi,., Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection C,city Analysis 3048: S 320 St & 11 PI S 04/30/2007 ♦ Movverr* EBL EBT E18 , kW,, IifBT';y, , .. s. _. .., S8R Lane Configurations j +ft+ '1 +T '1 4 4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -1% 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ..,- Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 _ '�� �` 0.98:. � sue,. Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 $'-: 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 '' �.;, ,; 0.92 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.99 Satd. Flow{prof) 1752 4850 3 „ 1764 5022 1611 1583 s i i � .=g 1678 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.99 Satd. Flow(perm) 1752 4850 1764 5022 1611 1583 1678 Volume (vph) 32 1265 268 88 1461 53 453 5 108 30 60 131 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 32 1265 268 88 1461 53 453 5 108 30 60 13'1 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 24 0 0 3 0 0 20 0 0 46 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 32 1509 0 88 1511 0 289 257 0 0 175 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 .;;10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 2 2 8 0 8 0 2 2 2 8 Turn Type Prot Prot Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases _, Actuated Green, G (s) 3.6 52.2 8.9 57.5 24.5 24.5 15.9 Effective Green, (s) 3.6 52.2 8.9 57.5 24.0 24.0 ,. _ Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.44 0.07 0.48 0.20 0.20 0.12 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 4.5 4.5 x 1,, -, 44 X*; , Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 53 2110 131 2406 322 317 208 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.31 c0.05 0.30 c0.18 0.16 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm y 1 . _ - ,.< .." v/c Ratio 0.60 0.72 0.67 0.63 0.90 0.81 0.84 Uniform Delay, d1 '. 57.5 27.8 54.1 23.3 ; 46.8 45.8 i ;; " . . -51.4 ,. Progression Factor 1.01 1.00 1.07 0.98 '1.05 '1.06 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.6 2.1 8.4 1.0 24.1 13.0 24 6 r' Delay (s) 70.4 29.8 66.3 23.9 73.2 61.3 76.0 Level of Service E C E C E E EAi `. Approach Delay(s) 30.7 26.2 67.4 76.0 Approach LOS C .. 1. ,C �' E li z ,5y ._ tea a s 4 HCM.Level of HCM Average Control Delay 36:7 atSwyjGe: D :4, HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) `- `. ' '' ., Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) ..,,,,,.4.1„, 15 _m' . , .i c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection , acity Analysis 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 04/30/2007 24 -- C 4\ t t `- 1 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT .VVBR NBL NBT ;RW; SBT SBR Lane Configurations VI tt1r, WI 1I r ri t+1 ri ttt r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time(s) , 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 4 :4 I ,i1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 44: 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3522 5119 3433 5045 1536 3358 4832 3426 5136 1522 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3522 5119 3433 5045 1536 3358 4832 3426 5136 1522 Volume (vph) 458 886 82 377 991 296 237 839 234 335 889 322 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 458 886 82 377 991 296 237 839 234 335 889 322 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 0 172 0 43 0 0 0 233 Lane Group Flow (vph) 458 960 0 377 991 124 237 1030 0 335 889 89 Confi. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 42 3 14.7 37.0 37.0 12.2 28.3 14.7 30.8 30.8 Effective Green, g(s) 20.0 42.3 14.7 37.0 37.0 12.2 28.3 14.7 30.8 30.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.35 0.12 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.24 0.12 0.26 0.26 Clearance Time(s)-- -* 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ` 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 587 1804 421 1556 474 341 1140 420 1318 391 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.19 c0.1 1 c0.20 0.07 c0.21 c0.10 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.53 0.90 0.64 0.26 0.70 0.90 0.80 0.67 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 47.9 31.0 51.9 35.7 31.2 52.1 44.5 51.2 40.1 35.2 Progression Factor 0.54 0.35 0.75 0.66 0.81 0.66 0.55 0.61 0.50 0.45 Incremental Delay, d2 4.4 0.8 17.1 1.6 1.1 3.2 6.8 7.6 0.9 0.1 Delay(s) 30.3 11.8 56.0 25.2 26.3 37.7 31.4 38.6 21.1 16.0 Level of Service C B ,. E C C D C D C B Approach Delay (s) 17.7 32.4 32.5 23.8 Approach LOS Bk: Cp, U: C C HCM,�.�_... , u-.,.._�.4. � ...�_.r v ..�,.��t�. �,.� _ . �_� .__. � __�_.�rin_ .,. . ..�_.Y . . Average Control Delay 26.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HC&1 Signalized Intersection Cz.r.dh/ ADalV8i3 3052-. S 320 S& & 20AxS 04/30/2007 &'* ":1-7��� T ` EBR ~ W VBT VVBR ' NBL�m'/NBTI: NBB� '�'SBL SBT ~�';�0R Lone Configurations M tt*t+ M W, Ideal Flow(m�pD 000 1900 1800 1900 1900 1000 1900 1800 1000 1800 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% 2Y& 1% -3% Total Lost time(S) 5.0 5�0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.8 5.0 Lune Udi Factor 0-0/ 0-81 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.80 1.00 100 ' - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.08 ` Flpb. ped/bikes 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0�99 1.00 0.99 100 0.93 1.00 0.90 Fit Protected 0.95 100 0.95 1-00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Smtd. Flow .3485 5068 Z399 4898 1718 1711 ` 1747 1678 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0�95 1-00 028 1.00 035 1.00 Smhj. Fkou 5068 «�-� 3399 4896 499 1711 � �� 644 1678 Voume (vph) 243 1056 64 SO 1413 145 147 84 81 191 88 159 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1l0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1l0 Adj F| ( 243 1056 64 50 1413 145 147 84 81 191 88 159 RTOR ) 0 4 D U 8 0 0 33 0 0 61 U Lane Group Flow(vph) 243 1118 O 50 1550 0 147 132 O 191 186 U ConU. Pedn.(#/hd 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 iO Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 0 O 8 U 8 0 G G 0 8 Turn Type � . � , ^ Prot Prot Pm+[t pno+pt Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted ` /��s � 8 Actuated Green, (3 (o) 12.1 68] 52 612 25J 15,0 297 1/.0 Effective Green, g(a)' 121 881 «��`^ 5.2 81/��� 247 14�5 28.7. 16.5 ActuatedRatio O]O 0.57 0.04 0.51 021 012 0.24 0.14 C1 (a) 5.0 5.0 � 5.0 5.0 , 4.5 4�5 .^�' +, 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (x) 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2-0 20 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 351 2876 147 '2497 208 207 2*-Z- v/n Ratio Prot o0.0/ 022 0.01 d}.32 0.06 0�08 oO.07 d}.11 v/a Ratio Perm! 0.00 ' 010~ v/oRaho 0.69 839 0.34 0.62 0 /1 0.64 0.72 0.80 Uniform Delay, d 1 144 55.7 21.1 41.8 50.3 39.350 Progression Factor 0i78 0.06 1.00 1�00 1D0 1.00 1.00 0.89 |norenlmnhd ' �.7 V.3 ` O�5 12' 83 4.7 71 16.3 =~�=°m =^��'' ^`^ � '' � Deuy(n) 442 141 36.4 222 51] 55.0 46A 86.0 Level of,Sd'�' D ^8 . D D Eu���| Approach 19.5 233 532 57.5 , , O - � HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 .Actualeid,A�O` 0, ` '20*�������.��»/fu^o^^^»*,NOW Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service D c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:8OpmO1/O3%2007 New Trip Assignment, ov078G. o/07 With Project SvnohouGReport HCM Unsignalized Intersectio.. _apacity Analysis 3053: S 320 St & 21 PI S 04/30/2007 Lane Configurations tti tti, r r Sign Control -;Free Free .} ->:, _ ,; Stop ;Ship- " Grade 5% 2% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 0 1089 . 0, 0 1570 =- ;0 :0 0 •0 0 ,, Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 1089.'; 0 1570 ', '0 0 ,"!. '' 0.s i;, ( : 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) 'fir ..: °1 . 04, -. , z Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blocka e 5 ` > • t - - -. Right turn flare (veh) Median type .: ih : , $,. g n x Raised , Median storage veh) 0 0 Upstream signal(ft) l��' :_ _ ff" •:; " pX, platoon unblocked 0.71 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.71 vC, conflicting volume 1570 _� P1 ? ' 4*, ;'' . 1612 2659 363 1933 2659 523 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1089 1089 1570 1570 vC2,stage 2 conf vot _ -,...'_ _ - ; 3. 1570 _ 363 1089 :`. vCu, unblocked vol 985 912 648 2040 119 1075 2040 0 tC,single(s) f , -. : t, � 1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF(s) . x '* `1, 4 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 cM *_. .. ;,, -4 ., ' , v� ,"_;105 833 125. 105 770 Volume Total 0 436 " 436..,.. 218 " 0". .-"628 628 31`4 0 ' 0 4 -. ° ,_ Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0':,q.'iel;i',:-.,`, ...!;;,0,:';iF cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.00 '0.37 0.37 0.18 0.00 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ale f Vv_ I; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,;,---0.0 0.0 0.0 ,.. Lane LOS A A l o.0 0.0. .. 0.0 0.0 = . Approach LOS A A Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity l:Jtiliz. § 4„s0. j ''''We Analysis Period (min) 15 w �a .:Li� 's.. i ...g..ti*. ', �.": T.,,;,d.,: f��.cn -�, ._. .. .� ., dam.� R Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment,or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: S 320 St & 23 Ay S 04/30/2007 -- 1". ~ k- 4\ t t \* 1 4/ Mpk t , . EBL EBT EBR,x fB ,., .WBT WBR NBL , 1•tBT , NBR SBL SBT. >,SBE Lane Configurations rl tf II) +ft ) t r liij •* Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 .'„:„.:,.. Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 ,E Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 fr , Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 'I.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3334 4824 3519 5025 1704 1839 1456 3323 1773 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 '1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3334 4824 3519 5025 1704 1839 1456 3323 1773 Volume (vph) 113 1022 34 389 1537 256 114 257 457 501 217 84 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Flow (vph) 113 1022 34 389 1537 256 114 257 457 501 217 84 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 ' 0 17 0 0 0 6 0 12 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 113 1053 0 389 1776 0 '114 257 451 501 289 0 Confl. Peels.(#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 16 0 0 8 2 8 2 16 16 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 41.5 19.0 50.5 1 1.8 20.5 39.5 20.0 28.7 Effectirre'Green, g (s) 10.0 41.5 19.0 50.5 11.3 20.0 39.0 19.5 28.2 W Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.35 0.16 0.42 0.09 0.17 0.32 0.16 0.23 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 v , 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Gap-(vph) 278 1668 557 2115 l;. , 160 307 534 540 417 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.22 0.11 c.0.35 0.07 0.14 c0.13 c0.15 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm _ 0.18 `. , v/c Ratio 0.41 0.63 0.70 0.84 0.71 0.84 0.84 0.93 0.69 Uniform Delay, dl 52.2 32.9 47.8 31.1 52.8 48.4 37.7 49.6 41.9 , Progression Factor 1.01 1.00 0.80 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.83 Incremental Delay,d2 0.4 1.8 2.1 2 9 ,11.8 17.0 11.2 21.7 3 9 Delay(s) 53.1 34.8 40.5 16.3 64.5 65.4 48.9 64.7 38.6 Level of ServiceServiCe 4tiii, D C D B ,�s E E D E D Approach Delay(s) 36.6 20.6 56.2 54.9 Approach LOS .*�: , ..;D 9- ,-4,-: �',,, . ,., D ... t 'ram . i t : .il.. E ,.=Y ., ‘,.. 1�.. k��,��� sn"�a<�` �.,. �Y s^�m.,,....., _�.2`�,.���...x2_��1»..x3i.,r_�.ad.:€a� „ a HCM Average Control Delay 354 ' `HCM Level of Service` - . , .i #, er . HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 4. Sum of lost time(s) , .. in. Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 ,, $.4 . < 4 % .. c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 ' HCM Signalized Intersection , acity Analysis 3056: S 320 St & Gateway Blvd S 04/30/2007 - -÷ -'* c 4- '"-- t t \w 1 4/ Movement ; - EBL EBT ;.EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL .NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tft , tTi II T. ) T. Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -1% 2% -1 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 ; 1.00 0.99 1.00 =0.98 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 r 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.86 h Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1752 4918 °1778 4972 1729 1546 1650 1566 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.42 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1752 4918 ",' `-1778 4972 1287 1546 722 1566 `t P'3 Volume (vph) 55 2018 18 99 2034 320 76 14 207 162 4 73 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. How(vph) 55 2018 18 99 2034 320 76 14 207 162 4 73 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 98 0 0 58 .0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 2036 0 99 2339 0 76 123 0 162 19 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 ; 10 10 ;f0 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 0 0 Turn Type Prot ; , Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 8 Permitted Phases `_ 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.2 68.8 11.1 72.7 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 Effective Green, g(s) 7.2 68.8 11.1 72.7 '-; .! 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.1 , Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.57 0.09 0.61 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Clearanc4Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 .. °' 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 105 2820 164 3012 4- 269 323 151 328 } v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.41 c0.06 c0.47 0.08 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm i'' * - 0.06 c0.22 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.72 0.60 0.78 0.28 0.38 1.07 0.06 Uniform Delay,dl 54.7 18.6 ,` 52.3 17.6 °' 39.9 40.8 47.5 38.0 Progression Factor 0.87 0.49 0.98 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 1.1 .. 3.6 1.7 , ,. 0.2 4._,.0.3 94.0 0.0 , Delay (s) 48.9 10.1 54.9 14.5 40.1 41.0 141.5 38.0 Level of Seruice. D BZr'-'-''''.,,,!;„. D B l , , :_[ �-. D ,F : D , Approach Delay(s) 11.2 16.1 40.8 108.1 Approach LOS , '>. B B 0 F :; < lntef0e . HCM Average Control Delay ' 19:8 ' HCM Level of Service" B M; ' HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time(s) '`' 15.0 `'� Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 :, c Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Cdp.city Analysis 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB Ramp 04/30/2007 C *-- 4\ r c ( 4/ Movement ; . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL ,.I(BR, SWL2 SWL SWR Lane Configurations ttt r ) ttt ) rrr Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 „ ; 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 -,..;,',A pa 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 5060 1492 1770 5085 *?' -< 1664 1664 3574 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm)'''' .. ` :.5060 1492 1770 5085 1664 1664 3574 Volume (vph) 0 1742 647 147 1528 0 0 0 570 24 936 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) n -1742 647 147 1528 0 0 0 570 24 936 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 293 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1742 354 147 1528 0 0 0 297 297 916 Confl.Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Turn Type Perm Prot Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 4 5 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 59.5 59.5 20.0 66.5 25.5 25.5 43.5 Effective Green. g (s) 59.5 59.5 20.0 66.5 25.5 25.5 43.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.17 0.55 ; 0.21 0.21 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2509 740 295 2818 354 354 1296 v/s Ratio Prot - c0.34 0.08 c0.30 k �:. c0.18 0.18 c0.26 fi ; v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 v/c Ratio '` ` .; . ;0.69 0.48 0.50 0.54 4',1' , .. :::::-`i 0.84 0.84 0.71 ._ Uniform Delay, d1 23.3 20.0 45.4 17.0 45.3 45.3 32.8 Progression Factor `; - ."" `0.38 0.40 1.05 1.23 xr„' V441•00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 1.6 0.4 0.7 15.2 15.2 1.5 Delay(s) _ 10.0 9.6 48.2 21.6< , :: 1',',- . 60.5 60.5 34.2 M Level of Service A A D C E E C Approach Delay(s)' !f`, 9.9 = 24.0 0.0 44.4 Approach LOS A C A D . HCM Average Control Delay 23.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio >,' 0.7 , s '; ` 0 : `- Actuated Cycle Length (s) -120.0 Sum of lost time(s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization ' 80.3% ICU Level of Service71i,gcgitVg Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4T. -,,,, . :_. 4 -, ,,n* 2,-*::. , ,y __ _.. , , _ ., . w....,,_ Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 • HCM Signalized Intersection i acity Analysis 3058: S 320 St & 1-5 NB Ramp 04/30/2007 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR'' SBL SBR NEL2' ' NEL NER Lane Configurations tti r' ttk '►I Y Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% -1% 3% 2% Total Lost time(s) ; .' 5.0 5.0 5.0 v 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.86 0.86 0.91 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes =: 1.00 0.99 0.99 a. m T- 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt t 1.00 0.85 0.98 3. w 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow(prot) � .: 4782 1335 4938 - , a ` -4 ,.,_ - 1664 1591 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow(perm) '7 r 4782 1335 4938 1664 1691 Volume (vph) 0 1616 792 0 1157 208 0 0 581 0 112 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00*4.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 0 1616 792 0 1157 208 0 0 581 0 112 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 P_' 0 9 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1616 792 0 1351 0 0 0 369 315 0 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Turn Type Free Split Protected Phases I.`; 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free Actuated Green, G(s) :, � 81.1 120.0 81.1 ...:r, _.. ` 28.9 28.9 1 ;- ' Effective Green, g (s) 81.1 120.0 81.1 28.9 28.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 1.00 0.68 4 4* 0.24 0.24 4 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 ` ,:" 2.0 2.0 ' Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3232 1335 3337 401 383 v/s Ratio Protilt;: 0.34 l -: , e - 0.27 -t ,.. ' ._` c0.22 0.20 -,,',1.:,;;;„'. v/s Ratio Perm c0.59 v/c Ratio '0.50 0.59 0.40 Uniform Delay, d1 9.5 0.0 8.7 44.4 43.1 Progression Factor 0.28 1.00 0.77 :,; , 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 1.5 0.3 25.8 12.7 Delay(s) �..' A44 . 3.1 1.5 ..,i,14::-. ,. 7.0 '. ;70.2 55.8 r '..4;'. ... Level of Service A A A E E Approach Delay( ;:-. 2.6 � -t 7.0 .> 63.5 ' ' 47 s Approach LOS A A ' A E • t e' ' ' ' HCM Average Control Delay 13.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 ,.,;; .f .-i..g * . Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 5.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization r., ,.. 74.8% ICU Level of Service x ate ` Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ,: t #. >,`. .i . � ; , ,4 � � Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3060: S 320 St & 32 Ay S 04/30/2007 _'i` 7 c 4-- 4\ t P 'i 4 Movement « , ,,EBL EBT - EBR -WBL WBT WBR .;, t ` R SB14 k.:; �� :R Lane Configurations ) tt ) tl '1 I 4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0°4% 0% -3% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 :x� 0.81f Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3525 1503 1770 3525 1782 1554 1366 ' = ) Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3525 1503 1770 3525 1782 1554 1366 �'' Volume (vph) 4 1559 25 7 1237 0 70 0 11 1 1 3 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 1559 25 7 1237 0 70 0 11 1 1 3 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 0k ,` 10 0 0 3 '0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 1559 20 7 1237 0 70 1 0 0 2 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Split Split Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 1.1 89.2 89.2 2.0 90.1 8.7 8.7 1.1 Effective Green, g(s) 1.1 89.2 89.2 2.0 90.1 8.7 8.7 0.1 4'' ` Actuated g/C Ratio 0.01 0.74 0.74 0.02 0.75 0.07 0.07 0.00 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4 0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)` 16 2620 1117 30 2647 129 113 Ai.* 1 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.44 0.00 c0.35 c0.04 0.00 c0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 ,z .... 0£ .- ,.F 7,, ._.., v/c Ratio 0.25 0.60 0.02 0.23 0.47 0.54 0.01 2.00 Uniform Delay, d1 59 0` 7.1 4.0 58.2 5.7 53.7 51.6 .a 60.0 `, Progression Factor 0.97 1.04 1.64 0.71 0.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Relay:02 2 6 t 0.9 0.0 1.4 0.6 2.5: '-0.0 ,l' r ., 1519.0 Delay (s) 59.8 8.3 6.6 42.7 3.2 56.2 51.7 1578.9 Level of Service >' E A A 4, D A E D `7 "_, F ,jk Approach Delay (s) 8.4 3.4 55.6 '1578.9 Approach LOS Vr. * A 1 s `'° : A E .# 0 ,..., F iiif � �'���'a�.Ab'r"�r"t- rr�,k.����} ¢� tt'�n_�. a€ .s ,+,���. F.-> '� .{z..�"`�5,'ra� yT,$'� rT� � w u� .xS;s' ( � �`-?ii.,.i' a ?�=+�,`` _a s sK:.e..aA,� ,.+__.,.. t w�...,�S'.. ':,,A'., HCM'Average Control etay ; 10:3 HCM Level of Service E : }r $ - HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s), 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) ''3 _ . ',`, Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15. Y . _ c, Critical Lane Group Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection ,_acity Analysis 3061: S 320 St & Weyerhaeuser Wy S 04/30/2007 4--- 4\ Movement EBT ; 'EBR WBL W BT NBL, NBR Lane Configurations 4t r tt Y r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3525 1507 1770 3525 3320 1386 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.96 1.00 +' Satd. Flow (perm) 3525 1507 167 3525 3320 1386 Volume (vph) 1607 95 259 1119 182 168 .r. Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph) 1607 95 259 1119 182 168:= � ` , , RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 32 0 0 22 109 Lane Group Flow(vph) 1607 63 259 1119 207 12 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 2 2 2 .. Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 �� . Permitted Phases 2 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 75.7 75.7 97.7 97.7 12.3 12.3 Effective Green, g (s) 75.7 75.7 97.7 97.7 12.3 12.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.63 0.81 0.81 0.10 0.10 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2224 951 363 2870 340 142 v/s Ratio Prot 0.46, c0.10 0.32 c0.06 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.48 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.07 0.71 0.39 0.61 0.09 :?.. Uniform Delay, d1 15.0 8.5 26.3 3.0 51.6 48.8 Progression Factor 0.52 0.51 1.02 0.26 1.00 1.00 n ` Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.1 3.9 0.3 2.3 0.1 Delay(s) 9.6 4.5 30.9 1.1 53.8 48.9 Level of Service A A C ADD Approach Delay(s) 9.4 6.7 52.1 Approach LOS A A D HCM Average Control Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 v ' Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group - W,47 4, ��,�:��*. . . Development Name 5:00 pm 01/03/2007 New Trip Assignment, or 07 BG, or 07 With Project Synchro 6 Report City of Federal Way Page 1 APPENDIX C ,n "- N .0 - n CD P o v O ' rl Ul -) — (O N V h N ,, w M w N w w 0) w w m .> n M d N n 0 H n to in .n u3 w w „ to w n i, n w w w w to to w to bs w .) to C y in V O 9 N CO mI ''� a m O m n (0 O ,t,. d H 10 N m r .fl I N i.*: L O 0 U w w n 0, » ., n 0, w » '_`_ ° m v m - o 3 .00o U C T m N O J '2 v i Q 0 N S 1- R { L a 4, z CO N 0 0 n DI . pJ t in n N t .v rJ . J' ._ .- N L O C C G xn M. O .Op 0 O 0 n r� rn m tO 0 r 0 0 n� o ~ m m m .- 1 t0 N v . .. v) (0 rl N m a p N f.o i 0'^ N N CO O 31: O N NC C( U a v U E J m NC) o a - 0 m Q H C m nZ co UaEFEo va E , v II (- E NO ` y0 = N N 3 N = C N C C 2 C T co Z U) N 0 O co 1.. O P. in N N N O G vp d 5 c ID C m oO a_ O No E E 24 2 N o 3 m -5X 9 T _, U o , Cv V � HO 0 n LZ _ ( rnO w U 0 0 3 c 0c co `n m m c m m m v 0 ZW d E wu " 3N i• c . a_ o of. m wmwn E - t <i 3 0 E E MN N o 3E a_ U - ] 3 m v m 0 a o W . p 3 oriQ m m r U K m cmm oyN IIV oE _o, ,-H m(/ m .- m " Im E0 5 EZ m n w m it om N D Z m Ti E o m m E F s c q >a m wz E n c c m w = m W g a a m UL - N Cc O C2 N a N p, Vl N C L _ v _ G. .O C C TsH F Wt Lm-� � LN - O' CU ? yOrp m 'N O NO y C ? C a U o wO J m c ° ^ -0 CO m cm NoC .m A N '• tp t- W n 70, 1p z c J w _ w m ? .n C 2C - v, m O Vc c NO.tO2 V TO a v 6 c IIryOma m Om p uOp l0m O U) a On N y =a =o'N'-' = 3 C N (V C = to A. as NZ C = y (r) y 0) _. Na as(nv mvy co in in NX II d II II IIa a v m y in a v v Z o a av � am II a a (II " a w vaa; a a u = a _ a O CO CC a r a J U 3 a w 3 z v toa' m Q v re m N N Q N N OT p a = N j U) M 3 3 C_ U) L_ U) IIn E c co co m a g O V U M O N L C 3 3 m p s N a' N J N M O Off, V) U) CO > ¢ K > i O co cr m fn V <o (O V) L (.0w m N H m N U V) L V) L N U) N m i N U O Y da L V>' ) .4 N L 0 . 'I' ( ¢ („' J > (11 Q t 0 n a a N co.. co. ( ¢ M a L. 6 NE V U C ¢J ¢ ¢N () N > _z,-, % OLmN nV14L N N N S V) V R N Ra m0N a Ua N m m U > con n um > n w a w cik ` v O Si Si in in w i ° O L i N 6 &i ' = i L _ N W 0 = L L lio LG aL > = � NLL a O Y 5L (.5y B. v U U U m_ Ncr, ry _ N ¢ _ cp NN CI; N tj'O, O, � L a e on - U) O a 2 () r, cr M 5 M cc cr 3 N n ci 3 n 3 c 3 d U U U U) co V U) V) ( cr.) N U) U) ) CO U) U) U) U) (n co col U) i p. a a CDO Q I- .- NO - NPa ' .- , e ,- ^ ~ N N x O NN N MN N 0 O N m • • • • •.-.1 4, C al 0 • O. 4 0 • _ 0 O 0 -1 .d a) +J 0 a) .-, to ✓ 4 a) -I N an bl O 0 C a) ra 4-1 4 f rJ 0) -.1 41 lJ 0 0 a) to ra O ,. a a CO a) .Q a) -.1 -I rn 4, 4 al - .0 • ..1 C O) .0 a) 445 C C 4 --1 u 4) rn -I 0 0 4) 0 C 4 4 .4 -r1 > n w 0 > > "a a) • v u, a a .� C ,J 4) Q. C H a, tr 4 (1) rd 4 a -rl 0 .0 a) 11 a) "O Cl C -.1 4 -.i _ 44 > .i C •.1 O H 4) 4 a) s3 a) 0' o a, 0 al w .a w a) rt a. m 0 0, w -.i a) 0 4 0 . 0 •.1 a) a) -.1 RI 0 > C C 0 4 -0 -1 >, m ,J a) 41 44 4-4 4, 0 0 ro 0 10 -1 4' ro w ca a a 0 C •.- ' > 1-. 0 ,, a, 0 rn a) a) ,.) a) 4 0 ro -0 . --I .4-.4 -4 m a) 'O in 4, w cif 0 1J rJ 4 U U C 0 a 41 0 4-, 3)0 , C RI --4 -,-I m .� tr 0 • .., ) 14 114 rn a) a) O E 44 41 4-4 0 0 r4 a In a) 4 •0 .0 >. 0 0 a) ,C U a) C .0 W N W Z Z 4, CO a) 0 C 4, 3 CT 4 4-4 RI 1-4a) a a) 4 >, a z a ro a) -1 4 4 0 - I a) al 4, .d 0 0 0 4 4 0 m a) a a. 4, a) a) a O. a v) 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 • Ti0 E W .0 0 = a) a a) a) a) tP al a) a) rn )1 4-1 rn O 0 .4 E, C a d .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 0 .0 .0 .0 a) a) a) 0 O a H .i 1--1 OI z z u N u +J 1-1 a 4' 44 1J >1 >1 P'. a N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 a) a) a) N a) a) N a) a 0.) a) a) al O) (1) a) a) a) a) a) a) 4, 1J 4, L) 4, i, u 4, 4, 4, 4 iJ 4, rJ 1J 41 4, 4 N 4, • 4, C C C C C C C C C C C 0 C C C C C C C C C O W W W w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W O o rC o 0 0 O 0 2 0 0 0 >, 0 0 0 2000 2 2 z z z Z 0 0 0 0 E. rn W m ,C r- r-1 rD R '. "a rC rn N 0') \ \ \ \ a o 0 a rzi • • • Z Z z O 0 Z O O O > J, `n 4. 0. 4. 4. U n 0 0 2 O O z z z Z H o 0 0 • o rn a >' C ti 41 -.I CO 0 .:4 o 0 0' 0 0 0 "f C o 0 2 0 0 o Z 0 0 0 a, 0 • O U W 0) 000 rg n 'i O O H W 4 2 Z Z Z 222 , FC 2 2 2 2 R. - O ak a# y(= 4# `r) 4 cn a) a k .~; aa) y N •n o 0 0 0, .-I 4) O N co N 0 a 0 CO 4) 1- ri �o 3 ro el. o 0 0, 0, Co o a m 10 0 Z 0 v 01 rn N co Nh 0 . N N 4 �. 4---4 0 W 0) 0 CO V1 N D O .-I o W 0) m v1 4 4 4 FC 1 el In O a) N N >. 2 ti O W 0 W < O W ,H \ y .v .N a RC 2 >., Z >+ 2 2 H < 2 2 2 2 0; '-1 c< rY. a 1k 4. 7f: 4 o• C O ., r• u (1) ra 4) O. 0 0 v) 1J a C C a, o 0 a) RI 0' .0 0 Cr i r1 a) .1 0. 0) Cr, a W O -.1 C rJ 0, vI 4 .i C C P1 '4 Z a) a ro ,n 0, H 4 RI a) a) a 0 0 a) m a A 0 4.., a 4 a 0, .4 E.cc a u +- as +) a 0• a) 1-1 (atr _d a 4 3 >. N 4, al 0' a, ow 4' 44 H a w >> 4 .1 H a, 3 (0 ro H a U a) a) a) a W i) ,n a 44 a1 rt H 4 z a a) >+ m N 44 0 C .1 ✓ O O >. >. 0 rn O ' to 2 .0 .0 "O IT a) 0' 4 r4-, a 4 0 0 .a > O U a .-1 .-, 4--, 13 t3 4 4 0• > r W 'Cl) a) C 0' >>., 2 C rT 'O a)) .4 a) m 4 N .� -rt rt, U U N a (1) a) o a) • E V 4,-H 4) .1 C 00 --i C 0 1 y) -.1 -.I 4 4 a) O rJ 4.1 rJ a) 0 0 --I A. ..i 4) 0 0 £ V) .0 -C a .0 4 -.1 1 .-1 4 -.i ..1 (I) 03 C '0 .1 a) a) 4-' a) 44 4-1 In ra ra N 0. a. -C 0- Ql r-1 a 4 A 0 a. tr, 0' O 0' (1) 4, In N a) V 0) 4 'O 4 1 a 0 3 a. a 4-, 'CS a) 0 N 4, rJ 0 0.1 -.1 A.) CA 4i 4J -.1 al '0 N 0 -.i -.. -.1 co -. 4 1 , -.I a 4 4 1) , , .. m a) o 0 l 0 4-, a o a. w 10 4) tr 0 0 < ra at .-1 4 4 -.1 A n a I a)_4) < (a 4 a, a)'W 44 C X RIo C X 0 a U a o1 m 0 a 2 ow a m W 0 0 a Q 0 v_E. E. 3 3 2 0 >. Z co a a E-. 3 3 a 3 W W 01 H W w