The URL can be used to link to this page

90-100813 (2) CITY OF G • (253)661-4000 ..\)\) 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 May 24,2000 Mr. Eric Wells Polygon Northwest Company 11624 SE 5th Street, Suite 200 + Bellevue, WA 98005 Dear Mr. Wells: Re: CAMPUS GLEN WETLAND MONITORING-File#90-100813 This is in response to your letter March 8,2000,requesting release of wetland mitigation assignment of funds for Campus Glen wetland monitoring. Your letter states that the success as defined by the initial wetland report is not physically possible at this site primarily because of theft of new plantings. This issue of whether the standards set up by the original mitigation report could be attained was resolved in 1998. After review of the 1998 monitoring report,the city had agreed to re-evaluate the feasibility of standards established by the original mitigation plan. This resulted in an on-site meeting with the city's and your wetland consultants. All existing topography and other factors were evaluated and a contingency plan was developed. The new plantings were to be installed by the end of 1998 and the new plantings were to be monitored at the end of 1999. If the intent of the wetland mitigation plan was met,the assignment of funds was to be released. However,no full monitoring report was submitted at the end of 1999. Now it appears from your correspondence that new plantings are not growing as some of the plantings have been stolen. Furthermore, instead of resolving the theft problem or installing new plants,you are offering to pay the city$3,000 in order to release your funds. Before installing plantings in 1998,you had requested assurance of a final sign off from the city by the end of 1999,as long as all new plantings were installed and growing. It is understandable that you would want to close out this project. The city's interest is also to end this ongoing project, as long as the intent of the wetland mitigation plan is met. However, after more than five years from the approval of the Campus Glen subdivision,the wetland buffers clearly have not attained the maturity that was envisioned at the time of approval for this development. Mr. Eric Wells Page 2 May 24, 2000 Your offer to pay$3000 in order to release the funds cannot be accepted. All new plantings (listed in the November 16, 1998, letter)must be planted and should be well established for one year in order to close this project. A full monitoring report must be submitted after one year of new plantings and must be evaluated by the city's consultant. Please be aware that according to the terms of the assignment of funds,the applicant is liable to perform according to the mitigation plan. The city may also bill the applicant for any additional amount(besides the assignment of funds)that may be needed to complete the required work. Please contact this office within two weeks of receipt of this letter to inform us how you will be proceeding with the monitoring. Otherwise. the city will pursue the release of funds in order to complete the work. If you have any additional questions, you can reach me by phone at 253-661-4082, or e-mail me at minnie.dhaliwal@ci.federal-way.wa.us. Sincerely, Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner L:\CSDC\DOCS\SAVE\54130606.DOC/Last printed May 23,2000 4:06 PM • December 23, 1996 Mr. Eric Wells, Project Superintendent Polygon Northwest Company 4040 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: CAMPUS GLEN SUBDIVISION WETLAND MONITORING King County File No. S89P0114—Federal Way File No.ILA-90-PPO8 Dear Mr. Wells: This letter is in response to the October 1995, submittal of the As-Built Plan for the Campus Glen Wetland Mitigation Plan. At that time we forwarded the As-Builts to Keith Fabing of Adolfson Associates, Inc., the city's wetlands consultant. Mr Fabing conducted a site inspection during which he compared the As-Builts to the original approved wetland plan (prepared 1/19/94 and revised 3/29/94) and the then existing situation on site. Mr Fabing made the following observations: 1. There were inconsistencies between the approved planting plan and the As-Built Plan in terms of number of plants installed. In general, the As-Built shows less than the approved planting plan. 2. Vigor status was not provided for installed plant materials as requested in the city's May 8, 1995, correspondence. 3. An accurate assessment could not be made of plants within the compensating storage pond in Tract G due to the high water level within this area. 4. The As-Built Report requested in the May 8, 1995, correspondence from the city to Eric Wells of Polygon was not submitted. As a result, at that time, the As-Built Plan could not be approved nor could any funds that were set aside to guarantee the wetland enhancement be released. It is now approximately one year later, and there should have been an opportunity for the wetlands to stabilize. We, therefore, again requested Keith Fabing to inspect the site. Mr. Eric Wells December 23, 1996 Page 2 The enclosed December 4, 1996, memorandum lists Mr. Fabing's observations. Please request your wetlands consultant, Terra Associates, to address all outstanding issues in the said December 4, 1996, memorandum from Mr. Fabing. As you are aware, a wetland monitoring report is required to be submitted by October 31, of each year for a five year monitoring period year starting in 1995 and ending in 1999. The first year monitoring report, which was due in October 1995, was never submitted, however, as requested in your January 19, 1995, correspondence, we will consider the 1996 monitoring report as the second year monitoring report. Please provide the following at your earliest convenience so that the city may determine whether your performance bond can be released at this time: 1. The second year monitoring report. This report must adhere to the standards outlined in the approved Wetland Mitigation Plan prepared January 19, 1994, and revised March 28, 1994. 2. A response to all outstanding questions or issues in the December 4, 1996, memorandum from Keith Fabing. Please also be advised that as stated in the enclosed September 5, 1996, letter from the City of Federal Way to all applicants, as of December 31, 1996, the city will no longer be paying for the review of any studies associated with environmentally sensitive areas. As allowed by Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Section 22-1243, the city will be providing these services on a cost recovery basis. This means that Polygon Northwest will be responsible for covering the cost of any review or studies undertaken by the city's wetlands consultant that may be necessary to monitor the Campus Glen wetlands. The cost of any such contract must be paid into a special account with the city's Management Services Department prior to receiving any wetland review. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 661-4111. Sincerely, Margaret H. Clark, AICP Senior Planner enc: December 4, 1996, Correspondence from Adolfson Associates, Inc. September 5, 1996, Correspondence from the City of Federal Way c: City of Federal Way Adolfson Associates, Inc. Greg Fewins, Principal Planner Keith Fabing, Project Biologist Stephen Clifton, Public Works Dev Review Mgr 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Julie Venn,Engineering Plans Reviewer Seattle, WA 98107 Mr. Eric Wells December 23, 1996 Page 3 CMPUSGLM2ndyr.mon ‘6, CITY of CITY HALL . 33530 1st Way South•PO Box 9718 Federal Way Feder Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 (253)661-4000 www.cityoffederalway.corn May 17,2004 Mr. Ron Miller Polygon Northwest 11624 Southeast 5th Street, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: File No: 90-100813-000-00-SU;RELEASE OF ASSIGNMENT OF FUNDS FOR WETLAND ENHANCEMENT Campus Glen Subdivision,Federal Way,WA Dear Mr.Miller: This is in response to your request for release of assignment of funds for the Campus Glen wetland enhancement. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code(FWCC) Section 22-154, after the work or improvements covered by a performance bond have been completed,the applicant may request the City to release the bond and refund the cash deposit. On October 19, 1994, $3,840.00 was deposited as an Assignment of Funds with Bank of America to cover the installation of required wetland enhancement,construction inspection,and a monitoring program. This surety account is now valued at$7,062.37. Based on a May 27, 2004 staff field inspection,the City has determined that the goals of the revised March 28, 1994 Wetland Mitigation Plan,prepared by Terra Associates, have been successfully met. Accordingly, enclosed is a Full Release of Assignment of Funds Notice releasing the full sum of Seven Thousand and Sixty Two and 37/100 dollars($7,062.37)from Assignment of Funds Bank of America Account#54100979. We appreciate your cooperation in the completion of this development. If you have any questions,please contact Jane Gamble,Associate Planner,at 253-661-4120. Sincerely, NIcaew, Kathy McClung, Director Department of Community Development Services enc: Full Release of Assignment of Funds Notice c: Jane Gamble,Associate Planner Bank of America,Attn.Richard Sisson, 101 South Tryon Street,NC1002-20-08,Charlotte,NC 28255 90-100813 Doc.I.D.27283 CITY OF Federal Way FULL RELEASE OF ASSIGNMENT OF FUNDS NOTICE Bank of America Bond No. 54100979 Pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond("Assignment") provided to the City of Federal Way("City")by Polygon Northwest Company,("Assignor"),dated October 14, 1994,for Campus Glen,Permit#ILA90-PP08 (90-100813-UP),the City hereby acknowledges that the work or improvements covered by the Assignment have been completed to the City's satisfaction,and that the City is not aware of any defect in workmanship or materials.Accordingly, the undersigned hereby requests that this account be closed and funds remitted payable to Polygon Northwest Company for the sum of Seven Thousand Sixty Two Dollars and 37/100 ($7,062.37)from Account#54100979. DATED this 17th day of March,2004. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: /7%1 ant-4467 Kat y Mc Si ng,Director Department of Community D elopment Services 90-100813 Doc.ID.27283 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WETLANDS CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Consultant: Adolfson &Associates 5309Shilshole Avenue NW Seattle,WA 98107 Project: Campus Glen Subdivision Wetland Monitoring. King County File No. S89P0114; Federal Way File No. ILA90-PPO8 Applicant: Polygon Northwest Company Date: June 16,1998 Project Planner: Minnie Dhaliwal,Associate Planner (253)661-4082 Documents : Wetland Monitoring report prepared by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. (WDI) for Polygon Northwest Company. Task Scope: Review wetland mitigation sites and monitoring report prepared by the applicant's consultant. Task Schedule: All work to be completed and report to be submitted to City staff within two weeks of receipt of signed authorization to proceed. Task Cost: Not to exceed $697 (as per your cost estimate) without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. Deliverables: Letter report Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Permit #:King Co. File #S89P0114 Project: Campus Glen Federal Way File #ILA90-PPO8 Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and Account Amount: $6,300.00 BPA Transmission Line and Cash Deposit Amount: $ 100.00 approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Avenue S., if extended CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ASSIGNMENT OF FUNDS IN LIEU OF BOND THIS ASSIGNMENT ("Assignment") is dated effective this 14th day of October, 1994. The parties ("Parties") to this Assignment are the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City") and the undersigned owner or applicant ("Assignor"). A. The Assignor is required to perform certain work, and/or construct and maintain certain improvements at the above-referenced property address located in Federal Way, Washington ("Property") in connection with Assignor's application under the above-referenced permit numbers and in accordance with an Agreement to Monitor Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan ("Agreement") entered into between the City and the Assignor of even date, which Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. B. The improvements will be constructed or the work will be performed in accordance with record drawings and approved plans on file with the City of Federal Way and specifically that certain Wetland Planting Plan and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., dated January 19, 1994 (as revised March 29, 1994) ("Plans"); C. The City has determined that Assignor must post security with the City pursuant to Sections 22-146 through 22-159 of the Federal Way City Code ("FWCC") as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended, to guarantee Assignor's performance of required maintenance or repair and Assignor's performance of construction of certain work or improvements pursuant to the Plans, as a condition of granting the permit. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Amount of Account. Pursuant to Section 22-149 of the FWCC that portion of this Assignment which is in lieu of a performance bond, shall be equal to one hundred and twenty percent (120%) of the cost of the work or improvements. 2. Assignment. Assignor does hereby assign, transfer and set over unto the City all right, title and interest in and to the sum of Six Thousand Three Hundred Dollars and no/100 ($6,300.00)on deposit at Seafirst National Bank ("Bank"),under account No. 941 00979 ("Account"); said Account being in the name of the City, as principal with full power and authority to demand, collect and receive the Account and to give receipt and acquittance for the Account. ORIGINAL • 3. Improvements. Assignor shall perform all monitoring required pursuant to the Agreement and Plans, to the City's satisfaction. The monitoring obligation shall continue for five (5) years from the completion date of the improvements, or such longer period as required by the FWCC or other applicable law, rule or regulation. 4. Release. Assignor agrees that the Account will be released to the City, on demand, . with no other conditions of release. This Assignment may be terminated with the City's written consent, which consent shall not be granted until the City has determined that (i) the monitoring has been performed to its satisfaction, in full compliance with the Agreement and Plans and all applicable local, state or federal law, and within the time period prescribed by the City, and (ii) Assignor has performed all its obligations under this Assignment. At the end of each Monitoring Program year and only after the City has inspected the Property to insure compliance with the Plans and Agreement, the City may release this Assignment by executing and delivering the Partial Release of Assignment attached hereto as Exhibit B and the Full Release of Assignment attached hereto as Exhibits C as follows: Monitoring Program Amount Released Year One $1,200.00 Year Two $1,200.00 Year Three $1,200.00 Year Four $1,200.00 Year Five $1,500.00 Total Costs: $6,300.00 5. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, perform any of the necessary work in connection with the monitoring required by the Agreement and Plans. Upon demand, Assignor agrees to pay the City an amount equal to all of the City's costs and expenses in performing such work or'the City shall be reimbursed its costs and expenses from the Account at the City's election. 6. Indemnification. Assignor agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Assignment, including without limitation, the City's performance of any maintenance, monitoring or other work or construction of the improvements pursuant to Section 5 herein. 7. Administrative Cash Deposit. In addition to the amount of this Assignment, Assignor agrees to pay a cash deposit to the City, pursuant to Section 22-151 of the FWCC, upon the execution of this Assignment equal to the amount of One Hundred Dollars and no/100 ($100.00). The cash deposit may be used by the City to cover its actual expenses in administering this Assignment and, if necessary, collecting and using the proceeds from the Account. -2- 8. Remedies Cumulative. No remedy provided for by this Assignment shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to every other remedy available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. Assignor agrees that its liability under this Assignment is not limited to the amount of the Account. 9. License. The Assignor hereby grants to the City the irrevocable license and right to enter the Property in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "D", to inspect such work and install or maintain the required mitigation pursuant to the conditions of final plat approval and the Plans, as the City deems necessary, and at the City's election. The Assignor shall record such license with the King County Department of Records immediately upon the execution of this Assignment, at Assignor's expense. 10. General Provisions. This Assignment may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the Parties. Any provision of this Assignment which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default shall not waive such breach or default. This Assignment may not be assigned by either Party without the other Party's written consent. This Assignment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties' successors in interest. In the event of any dispute between the Parties regarding this Assignment, each Party shall pay its own attorney fees and costs. Each person executing this Assignment represents that he or she is authorized to execute this Assignment on behalf of their respective entity. Time is of the essence. CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: Approved as to Form (si naature) � �1 /, llv.7 ,<1 �CC //°..0( A4_ (printed name and title) o • , i y torney 4030 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 KABONDS\CAMPSGLN.ASF Kirkland, WA 98033 10-18-94 (206) 822-7700 -3- BANK ACCEPTANCE The undersigned financial institution ("Bank") hereby accepts that certain Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond provided to the City of Federal Way ("City") by Campus Glen Limited Partnership ("Assignor") dated October 14, 1994, providing for Assignor's assignment to the City of all right, title and interest in and to the sum of Six Thousand Three Hundred Dollars and no/100 ($6,300.00) on deposit at the SEAFt.Q i ) 6ELLLv u c branch, under account no. 54100979 ("Account"), payment of which shall be made upon demand by the City with no other conditions of release of the Account. The Bank agrees to hold the Account, without deduction or withdrawal, until it receives a written release of this Assignment from the City. The Bank acknowledges that it has no duty to evaluate any dispute which may exist between the City and Assignor regarding the Account and shall not interplead or in any manner delay payment of the Account to the City, upon its demand. The Bank hereby agrees to bind itself, and its heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, jointly and severally. SeAFL(z51 /tlili�crv�c ��ALk [BANK] BY: Signature of Authorized Personnel (Signature to be notarized below) ITS: PER5oN 4 c 6AN k_r_At b C)f1icC/L (Title) RO. Boy 907 I� e L Lc vu 6 r A mei (ADDRESS) C?(a �35 - J/ov (PHONE) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. [BANK NOTARY] COUNTY OF KING ) - O this day /� personally appeared before me l� n E S , to me known to be the�efsth,,/ 8 Ofi ttlf Seq/sf- /3cn , the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. GIVEN my hand and official seal hereto affi his 201 day of Oc/tr60Q , 19 9y R Si epee KEVIN R R1 OCH ,. �S�ON (typed orprinted name of notary) � �� T ARY ��'y ,e� YP Y � " �Q Notary Public in and for the t�e pfashington. i --;°"" % My commission expires 7 / f PUBUG : z I' �Q 0 �cc , ,,= OF WA�� EXHIBIT "A" Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Project: Campus Glen Permit No: King Co. File #S89P0114/ Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and ILA90-PP08 BPA Transmission Line and approxi- mately 8th Ave. S. & 4th Ave. S. , if extended AGREEMENT TO MONITOR WETLAND AND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN Basis for Agreement A. The undersigned Principal applied to King County ("County") under the Project name, Campus Glen ("Project") and under BALD File No. S89P0114 and to the City of Federal Way ("City") under Permit No. ILA90-PP08 to construct certain improvements or perform work at certain real property previously located in King County, State of Washington, and after the date of the City's incorporation, located within the city limits of Federal Way, having an address more commonly known as between S. 328th St. and BPA Transmission Line and approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Ave. S. , if extended. ("Property") ; B. The City determined that a mitigation plan must be installed and maintained as a condition of preliminary plat approval granted August 17, 1993 pursuant to City of Federal Way Resolution No. 93-149; and C. The City will grant final plat approval only if the Principal agrees to install and maintain the mitigating measures set forth in the preliminary plat approval as more particularly described in that certain Wetland Planting Plan and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. , dated January 19, 1994 (Revised March 29, 1994) , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference ("Plan") . Terms of the Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, the Principal hereby agrees and binds itself, and its legal representatives, successors, and assigns, as follows: 1. Notice. The Principal shall notify the City in writing upon completion of all installation as described in the Plan. At such time, the Principal shall further provide, in writing, to the City, the dates the Principal will commence the mitigation observation and the dates it will submit each of the monitoring observation reports pursuant to Section 3 herein and as required by the Plan. 2 . Bond/Assignment of Funds. The Principal shall provide to the City a Performance/Maintenance Bond, Assignment of Funds, or other security in form and content acceptable to the City to guarantee the Principal's performance of the monitoring as required by this Agreement and the Plan, to the City's satisfaction. 3 . Monitoring. The Principal shall maintain the improvements installed under the Plan so as to create healthy growing conditions for a period of five (5) years commencing on the date of completion of all installation described in the Plan. The Principal shall submit a monitoring report on the status with as-built drawings within one (1) year after installation and subsequent monitoring reports for the following years shall be submitted within twelve (12) months of submission of the prior report. While maintenance may result in a partial release of any bond or other security posted by the Principal, at the City's election, the Principal recognizes its continuing duty to maintain the Plan as required by the King County Code or other applicable federal, state or local law. 4. Contingency Plan. If the Project has not met its performance standards set forth in the Plan by the end of the five (5) year monitoring period, the Principal is responsible for the preparation and implementation of a contingency plan to remedy the situation, in form acceptable to the City. 5. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, perform the monitoring as required by this Agreement and the Plan, and upon demand, the Principal shall pay the City an amount equal to its costs and expenses in performing such monitoring or the City shall be reimbursed its costs and expenses pursuant to any bond posted by the Principal, at the City's election. 6. Indemnification. Principal agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Agreement, including without limitation, the City's performance of any monitoring or other work pursuant to Section 5 herein. 7. Remedies not Exclusive. No remedy provided for by this Agreement or any bond or other security posted by Principal shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to every other remedy available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. 9. General Provisions. This Agreement may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the parties. Any provisions of this Agreement which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default by the Principal shall not waive such breach or default. Each party shall pay its own attorney's fees and costs in connection with any lawsuit or other action relating to this -2- Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Principal's successors in interest, heirs and assigns. Time is of the essence. DATED effective this 147 day of October, 1994. PRINCIPAL: CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC. , Its General Partner By: ✓' (sign re) Carl /0-,1 (/rt</-1. `,/4- (printed name and title) 4030 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 (206) 822-7700 K:\BONDS\CAMSGLN.MON 10-14-94 -3- EXHIBIT A [ATTACH WETLAND AND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN] EXHIBIT B PARTIAL RELEASE OF ASSIGNMENT The undersigned hereby acknowledges that a portion of the conditions set forth in that Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond ("Assignment") provided to the City of Federal Way ("City") by Campus Glen Limited Partnership ("Assignor") dated October 14, 1994 for Campus Glen, King Co. Permit #S89P0114/ILA90-PPO8have been satisfied and hereby authorizes the release of an amount equal to One Thousand Two Hundred Dollars and no/100 ($1,200.00) from account number 5 V/D O 9-7 9 ("Account") in the Branch of 6e4-1;rsfi acci ie -,v.€ 4iJ Bank"). The remaining funds shall be held by the Bank in the Account pursuant to the terms of the Assignment as security for Assignor's performance of all monitoring for the project described therein. DATED this day of , 19_. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: (Name, Title) • EXHIBIT C FULL RELEASE OF ASSIGNMENT/LICENSE • Pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond ("Assignment") provided to the City of Federal Way ("City") by Campus Glen Limited Partnership ("Assignor") dated October 14, 1994 for Campus Glen, King Co. Permit #S89P01 14/ILA90-PPO„ the City hereby acknowledges that the five (5) year monitoring period has expired, that the work or improvements covered by the Assignment have been completed to the City's satisfaction and that the City is not aware of any defect in workmanship or materials. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby releases the sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No/100 ($1,500.90)from account number SSA/00 491 `I in the &e//e U Ue_ Branch of SeaA r,Si— i icth01i etel ("Bank"). The undersigned further releases all right, title and interest granted to the undersigned by reason of a certain License Agreement recorded under King County Recording No. ("License Agreement") and acknowledges that all obligations and rights contained in the License Agreement are hereby terminated. DATED this day of , 19 . CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: (Name, Title) EX b FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR: Campus Glen Limited Partnership RECORDERS USE: MAIL TO: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 ATTN: Margaret Clark LICENSE The undersigned owner of certain real property located in Federal Way, Washington and legally described as follows: [Legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference] ("Property") hereby grants an irrevocable license to the City of Federal Way ("City") and the City's agents, employees, contractors or representatives to enter upon the Property to inspect the construction of improvements, the performance of work or to allow the City to perform any necessary maintenance or work, all pursuant to Agreement to Install and Maintain Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan, Agreement to Install and Maintain Vegetative Buffer/Landscape Improvements Plan, Agreement to Monitor Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan, Cash Deposit Agreements and Assignment of.Funds entered into between the City and the undersigned, which Agreements are incorporated herein by this reference. •DATED this day of October, 1994 . CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner • By:` r (signat [, t a ry L' �e)� N\ (printed name and title) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. • COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ary h. yyO14,4 , is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed'this insttumenf,?on oath stated that he was authori±ad to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as V1, . Peet/Wind' of BRENTVIEW, INC., which is General Partner of POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, which is General Partner of CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED r ARTNEISHIP, to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. fh GIVEN my hand'and official seal this day of Oc er, 1994. STef. 17/LLi M- Sou/c (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for th; Stet: of Washington. K:BONO CAMPSGLN.uc My commission expires (,,1/No!/ EXHIBIT "A" TO LICENSE SURVEY DATA CORRECTED LEGAL DESORPTION FROM BASELINE ENGNEERING NQ That portion of the North half of the Southwest quarter and that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and that portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, all in Section 17.. Township 21 North. Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying within the parcel described in a quit claim deed recorded under Recording No. 9308121901 and surveyed and liegeIly described by Terrell C. Ferguson, P.LS.. of Baseline Engineering Inc., in records of survey recorded in Volume 94 of Surveys at pages 141 and 141a and Volume 95 of Surveys at pages 116 and 116a, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of said Section 17; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said Section 17, a distance of 1,317.78 feet; THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East, a distance of 42.00 feet; THENCE South 88' 49' 37" East, a distance of 686.72 feet to the Northwest corner of King County Short Plat No. 580108 per Recording No. 8104300739. records of King County; Washington; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said King County Short Plat. a distance of 1,112.24 feet to a point on the Southerly right—of—way line of South 328th Street; THENCE South 75 27' 16" West along said Southerly right—of—way line. a distance of 25.00 feet to the Northwest corner of the Plot of West Highlands Division No. 1, as recorded in Volume 127 of Plats. pages 26 through 28. records of King County. Washington; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said plat. a distance of 484.39 feet to the South line of said plat; THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East along the South line of said plat..a distance of 14.69 feet to a tangent curve concave to the North having a radius of• 1,100.00 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 10' 24' 04", an arc distance of 199.69 feet to the Northeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142, per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County. Washington. said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;. THENCE continuing along said curve to the left having a radius of 1,100.00 feet. through a central angle of 76' 34' 24". an arc distance of 1.470.10 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of King County Short Plot No. 580108, per Recording No. 8104300739. records of King County. Washington; THENCE South 86' 34' 16" .East along the South line of.Campus Green II. a condominium as recorded in Volume 53•.of Condominiums at pages 96 through 97. records of'King County. Washington, a distance • • of 369.70 feet to the West line of the Plat of Heritage West. as recorded in Volume 91 of Plats, pages 11 and 12. records•of•King County. Washington; THENCE South 32' 34' 05" East along the West line of said plat, a distance of 239.16 feet to an angle point in said West line; THENCE South 36' 10' 33"- East continuing along the West line of said plat, a distance of 157.41 feet • to an angle point in said West line of said plot; • THENCE South 23' 28' 12" West continuing along the West line of said plat. a distance of 105.00 feet to the Southerly line of South 327th Street as shown in said Plat of Heritage West, and •a point of curvature with a tangent curve concave to the Northeast whose radius point bears North 23' 28' 12" East and is 380.00 feet distant; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 42' 17' 45". an arc distance of 280.52 feet to on angle point on said Southerly line of South 327th Street; . THENCE South 18' 49' 33" East along the Westerly line of said South 327th Street and the Westerly line of Lot 61 of said Plat of Heritage West, a distance of 181.32 feet to the Northwesterly margin line of Bonneville Power Association Transmission Line right—of—way. Tacoma—Grand Coulee No. 1 recorded under . Recording Nos. 3131454, 3186542. 3252183. 4201227. 4660593. 5151465. and 5204177; THENCE South 52' 58' 44" West along said Northwesterly margin line, a distance of 1,803.52 feet to the Southeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142 per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County. Washington; • THENCE North 37 01' 16" West along the East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 516.50 feet to an angle point in said East line; THENCE North 09'. 21' 29" West continuing along said East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 299.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO easements. covenants. and restrictions of record. • • i h ti POLYGOINT n NORTHWEST LOMPANY August 26, 1999 Campus Glen Homeowners Association 31849 Pacific Highway S. #192 Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Open Space Tracts Dear Board Members: We are writing to you to request your help and cooperation. We have been working with the City of Federal Way to complete the wetland mitigation and enhancement that was required as part of the Campus Glen plat. As part of this work we have planted trees and shrubs in several areas within the open space tracts. We have experienced over the last two years that many of the plants are missing. We have attempted to correct this by providing a fence and signage to inform residents of the sensitive area and to deter them from entering the area. We are requesting your help in reminding residents of the nature of the sensitive areas and the restrictions placed on these areas. The plants in these areas are part of the mitigation/enhancement plan and should not be disturbed. Please feel free to call Minnie Dhaliwal at the City of Federal Way at 253-661-4000 or myself at 425-586-7700. Sin er ly, Malcolm Mc • - Project Coordinator RECEIVED BY T pFPAPTMENT AUG 3 0 1999 11624 S.E.5th Street,Suite 200, Bellevue,Washington 98005 (425)586-7700 Fax(425)688-0500 07-12-1999 07:33AM FROM TO 12536614129 P.01 I F Ax Date 7/12/99 INumber of pages including cover sheet 3 TO: Minnie Dhaliwal FROM: Malcolm McNaughton Polygon Northwest Company 11624 SE 5 ' St. Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone 253-661-4082 Fax Phone 253-661-4129 Phone 425-586-7700 Fax Phone 425-688-0500 I CC: REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ® For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please Comment Please see attached report from Watershed Dynamics. I apologize for the delay in getting this to you. Please call me should you have any questions_ 07/12/99 MON 08:52 [TX/RX NO 5488] 07-12-1999 07:33AM FROM TO 12536614129 P.02 "j 6 e �, e r -r i , . ,c, ,,."; t ri. P' �'i` L. F F 6 ti yG 'P ltln `� 2, `.� +� r I F C 14: ti.J"i ti , f .J ; 7''�`'( G it,' T ) r,i-y 4 t� rr 4 ,- IC •,,e µ ; =„M.' I..., ,4 F+;.(. 1 r I, r I r r, 4:k t i•tt��- ._:1..". '.. ,,l,,,a .7 ::,., 1.*c P � .t�:� 1-1 r E 7yl � b .,!i: 1 L ' . .tea:.�t a :+.'F.+nwt� Y .Matti3al. .,�C_,�e�. e:/!:r.�Mr�in�r'��ir i�idwrti��. ,>(�iiL'a1:Y1'^�^�f1� ; �,J� DATE: ' June 24, 1999 'c.'., 1.425.698.0580 TO: Mr:Malcom McNaughton,Project Manager Polygon Northwest Company SUBJECT; Post-construction Monitoring — - FROM: Larry D. Burnstad PROJECT NAME: Campus Glen PROJECT NO.; WDI No.98023AT • Malcom— • • Per our conversation last week,I am sending you this memo to summarize the findings of my most recent$it*visit (6/11/99)to the mitigation areas at Campus Glen in Federal Way, Washington. As requested, I looked at each of the mitigation areas to determine if the planting had been completed and the wetland boundary signs had been; installed as requested by the City of Federal Way (I/12/49 Memo). I did not conduct a complete monitoring: assessment since you had indicated that you did not want that done at this time. I inspected Tract C,including the area where the utility turn around was located,to determine if the plants requested by the City of Federal Way had been planted. I found 6 Douglas fir(Pseudorsuga menriesii), 12 saki (Gaultheria shallon), 8 Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa), 1$ snowberry (Symphoricarpur rdbus), and 10 sword fern (Polystichirm manrrtum) that had been planted late last fhll or during this past winter. This appears to be in compliance with the City's requests, All the plants were doing well and an effective buffer restoration has been achieved. I inspected Tract E and found that all of the pink flags, which were used to mark where the new plants had been planted,had been pulled out of the ground and placed in a pile near the edge of the wetland. I was able to find 2 Douglas fir,2 big-leaf maple(Ater macrophyllnm), S snowberry,and 6 sword fern,two of which still had flags in the ground marking their location. Based upon the number of pink flags I found(43),1 think it is Stir to say that the plants were all planted. I did find a couple of areas of disturbed soil that may have been locations where plants had been installed but there was not a plant in either location. At the risk of sounding negative,i think you are fighting a losing battle with the buffer at Mier E. This is the third nine that you have attempted to plant this area and this is the third time the plants have disappeared. I did notice that the volunteer red alder(.41nus rubra)is doing well and those plentli that haw survived from the initial planting also ' I appear to be doing well. The buffer will be completely revegetated without further intervention. I would suggest that you have done ail that you can to do relative to the mitigation effort. It does not appear to be prudent to continue planting this area when the majority of the plants get removed or trampled. Perhaps the City of Federal Way would be willing to release you from that portion of the mitigation plan considering the effort you have made and the lack of control you have over the results. McNaughton Memo—6/24/99—Page 1 07/12/99 MON 08:52 [TX/RX NO 5488] 07-12-1999 07:34AM FROM TO 12536614129 P.03 • I reviewed Tract G and found all of the plants the City of Federal Way requested had been installed. All of the existing plants were doing very well and the buffer area plants were providing approximately 45%aerial cover. The willow(Sake sp) and cottonwood (Papules rrichocarpa)planted in response to the City of Federal Way request showed vigorous growth as did the red elderberry (Sambucus raeemosa) end red-osier dogwood (Corms srolosifa a). I also observed that the slough sedge (Carer obnepia) had spread to other parts of the pond and the natural cottonwood seedlings were spread over about 50%of the pond area. In summary, Tract Cr appeared to be doing quite well despite the evidence of a lot of young people playing in the area. I found wetland signs posted at all three tracts and the signs were not damaged or altered in any way_ The split rail fence at Tract E was in excellent condition and,although their appeared to be some damage to the vegetation due to young people playing in the buffer,the fence did not appear to be damaged. Overall,the intent of the mitigation effort at the three sites has been met and with the exception of Tract E, the buffer vegetation is as dense as you would expect for sites planted 3 years to S years ago. Polygon Northwest •implemented the original mitigation/enhancement plan and has been very responsive to the City's requests for follow-up work required to meet the intent of that plan. Based upon my observations I would suggest that Polygon Northwest Company has met the intent of site mitigation and no further work is necessary regarding the buffer and wetland mitigation projects at the Campus Glen site. If you have any questions regarding this memo,please call me so I Can answer those questions for you, Memo to Malcom McNaughton—6/24/99—Page 2 Polygon Northwest—Campus Glee(98023AT) TOTAL P.03 07/12/99 MON 08:52 1TX/RX NO 5488] POLYGON n NORTHWEST COMPANY June 21, 1999 .,r Ann Dower t �-� 2 5 �„<,.� City of Federal Way �'�"'�` � 33520 1stWay South � ' yr��x.., -�- .x..v.�,',� Federal Way, WA 98003-6210 AD��t;� S t3„kr:n7\T,,%`$zp iv RE: Campus Glen Bioswale Dear Ms. Dower: Thank you for your letter of April 5th. I apologize for my slow response. I visited the site last Sunday and observed the following: 1. Minimal growth in the bottom of the bioswale. This is likely caused by inundation of water through the winter. 2. Small amounts of garbage in the bio-swale. Actions to be taken: 1. The bio-swale will be raked and seeded. We will request re-inspection upon establishment of new growth. This will likely occur in the fall. 2. Garbage will be removed. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please feel free to call me at 425-822-7700 should you have any questions. Sincerely, \1\k Malcolm McNaughton Development Coordinator 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201,Kirkland,Washington 98033 (425)822-7700 Fax(425)827-4098 • 1/4 CITY OF • (253)661-4000 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 April 5, 1999 Jonathan Weinman, Accountant Polygon Northwest Company 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE Campus Glen Bonds, Permit #ILA90-008 Dear Mr. Weinman: In response to your letter dated March 22, 1999, I have researched our files on Campus Glen and can provide you the information listed below, which follows the order of your spreadsheet: 1. As you indicated, $5,000 of the administrative deposit for Bond #94-1012 was retained by the City to assure that the bioswales for Campus Glen were functioning and grass was growing. The bioswale next to the wetland has not functioned properly, grass has not become established, and the channel is currently full of mud and debris. Once this situation is corrected, the remainder of the administrative deposit, less any applicable inspection fees, will be released. Enclosed is a letter to Malcom McNaughton, Development Coordinator for Polygon Northwest Company, explaining items that need to be addressed. This relates to item #1 in your letter. 2. The security listed in your spreadsheet for "wetlands planting" for $2640 dated 9/22/94 is not shown in our bond files or building permit records. 3. The "tree planting deposit" for $3,840 on your spreadsheet was an assignment of funds deposited with the City and, as your records show, released on 2/27/97. The number is 94-1023. 4. Assignment of funds #94-1025 for $1,788 was released on June 20, 1997. A check for the $100 cash administrative deposit was issued on June 26, 1997. This relates to item #4 in your letter. 5. The security listed in your spreadsheet $1,200 dated 10/20/94 is not shown in our bond files or our building permit records. 6. I was unable to find the refund listed in your spreadsheet for $2,450 and dated 2/27/97 in our files (item #3 of your letter). RECEIVED BY (Q^^!v!!)�Jir✓7F\tc,,.OPMENT Dc n RTM 'y' 7. Security #94-1021, in account#54100979 at Seattle First National Bank, is an assignment of funds. It covers the five-year monitoring period for the wetlands and becomes eligible for release on 10/19/99. The administrative deposit amount is $100, and the security amount is $6,300. Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner for the City of Federal Way, is working with Malcom McNaughton on the conditions of release. You may contact her at 661-4082 if you need further detail. This relates to item #2 and #4 in your letter. 8. Security #94-1022 is an assignment of funds deposited with the City of Federal Way for wetland construction and enhancement in the amount of $3,840, with an administrative deposit of $100. Please work with Minnie Dhaliwal on this item. This also relates to item #2 of your letter. If you have any further questions or information on the items that were not resolved, you may contact me at (253) 661-4125. Sincerely, Ann Dower Engineering Plans Reviewer AD:jg cc: Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner Stephen Clifton, Community Development Director Project File Day File L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENT\ILA90 PP.08\P W040599.DOC CITY OF • \):11\) FIN/ (206) 00 - 20 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 • January 12, 1999 FILE Malcolm McNaughton Polygon Northwest Company 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, Washington 98033 Re: Campus Glen Wetland Monitoring Dear Mr. McNaughton, This is in response to your phone call on January 12, 1999. You had requested a clarification regarding planting on the gravel area in Tract C. The original wetland mitigation plan had proposed plantings in the current gravel area on Tract C. The gravel is apparently left behind where the construction trailer was placed by Polygon Northwest. There is no need to maintain the gravel turnaround area to provide access to the beehive structure. Only the west 15 feet of the gravel area(as shown on the attached plan) is drainage easement to the City.No additional area is required to be maintained for drainage purposes. Plantings as recommended by memorandum dated November 16,1998 from Adolfson and Associates are required in the gravel area. Also the soil needs to be properly prepared prior to planting. If you have any additional questions, you can reach me by phone at 253-661-4082 or E-mail me at Minnie. Dhaliwal@ci.federal-way.wa.us. Sincerely, Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner - .: :....::::::„.::',;:,'.7%:":,..7-:,74),Wtn:::::rt'-..;:r.:1::. ': .. -.::::' 7-:.-:;-:..7.7.-,!!•r-:'• ,-, '--:,Ti, ,• -:.47.1 .%, . . . . - - ---- e r•....4 0-, .. ..:-•-•.,,-......,;•:,^"r''''',..T,•:7. 9?-1.1-1.37.7 '71'!'1177''''''- ..- 7'- ',. --. ...----'77" 11117:4 , , . ..r..... '4! -:- \. r., ----' ..- • .- -..s, .. // . ,• .,,. .. ...'" •' / r • . EDGE OF WETLAND,..., ...._,..„...._.',..-.....".'-.-..._' ' 4::. 1.14i14''''''':-.;::-i / ./ ..- / ...- / //-• . / , '''' $ , / / 1 ' 114 ° ./ i •• I . . / • ' -.'•"-'-' •:: -f- .. :-•-•-•:•:-..- - 44, • • i • ,.:, , ,..,, -7 , CS • \ / / f Ii •1 : 1 i N / i I 1 :..... .....,. . . . . \ . •• . . • .:: .. . . . :; - . g. „..-14- _ . •.... . --/ - - - ..-. - . I I • . . - - - - .•- 4 _._ .....___.__ ......._. s . . 5 57 LF 18" CPEP 0 1.10% „..,, ,. ——— 7r-----,, -------., i (OVERFLOW) ----,... ; ---_ r -_ ...... 15' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO CITY %,....1 , ---7......... N IP I"1"111141 , • • \. • ii. 1 -7 \._ I . , .. -. . •. - - • • - • .• . -• 741111111111k. . , . . . . . . • . .- . . • -- - - - ••--•...- :..... in,i,iz,,,,-..: , ,:.:*, ..........77 ....r7T!...7:777.-............", ,!...:. ..4,:;tilt:ii;N i . iitie-f............................................i',:ri-:iK!'igif.':!•=1::ii.i-ri:,--'::.i-Vlii.',7-:: ;', .':-,1;Vri!....-.:p!: !i?":.: .',.1.-: r.,..::7-:?P::;.1:,'.&:.- '.!4„ ':;:!Iiig:!:::;-'-:Ift.:ii: 4.41'.T'-:0;'.`r,itIE :bqa.:r.:::J.!1::::::N''''';;:,-'-A'.;;:;..-:;ii..... .:'.,'ia;':.' .- HI- --' .Ag.........................'''i.............................................4,Q.-:4',:;j :-,r. :-::...:::-.::::iiii:::: :..:,,::,'„i:-.}:,,,. :„..i: k.::::,,I:fr.:.,,-',-:,- .,:,:,:-.*.a,.i.:.: :E.,r..i<:,,:.:0" .“'''.•e-:.': ..':" ' ,: i:e._-..k - .-.-.--.:•.,.'.:.-r.-:::..:.-m-::-.•.-.:rilj74,:iii:::-::,•,..-rJ,:.::IF,',:? ..-,-,-::t--.;;2-.,::,x,,k*:,-.. ,•;,:r;;;;--;-,r7.Z":".:71 ,. :3„::...,.7.:4',„:.,-;,-;_ •4_Z r`-•-•':.'!:,'Z','.:',.:,„:i':-..'.;±•;:i'..'n-..;•;•:-.- zi,.,:_-,:,.J.,7.:.••',;.,.,,j:zi 2:i::.,..•:.::: ...,..,:-.:.1.%:/E::::•:. MA eg%:';'#eVa:,:it't,;',-!1.. •.-s! :- -,,';ii?---'''';-,7't''-'!'-- .-:::-.: '-?-=';;:-. 2"''.:!H......... iii.-i. . . ilik r;' ,.,..„,,.47;iii,--- V ,:.9 1-k;:;:-.,--..-. '...-.F:.-'..E-.Ei........................................::::;,::;:.!...:: 77.! inftfPr..f-',i'•'W•'.'1''' 'il''"• '"'•:- 3::::'7,;';';'..1',4-,F;;;:::,,,,,7•:;;.2. ..'.'ir---i7;.1--,:-.'...r..'--,,,,',:':'::: :':. ::'""''''''''''''''''''-''''•-• -.. _._,,,,:..-:.--...•,,,..,,,, .CY-OCriA•i: '.'::.: :::::i:.::'.1'.:!4 ii--. ].,:g:',::NE'''..-1:‘,4.,.............:i . :a..•".;;.,:.......'... .:..1 :: :-::;---........'-..-•:..• :ir,,,-„,...1.:::: g.,.::::.::,,,.,.. .,:-...iik,;,. ........-....3i.4.,...;.-„,840:0_,i.,1 :•::..ik:,::,,..,,,..,..:,:i,E:i.s:.;:,,,..t tr,,.... :K.'.1%i ,,,,,,.,ie•-;;;c4s.,:Aiiiie.m,,, ,„.,„..K.,;;, .*5*-h'Veer -',) s'•.i• PER :‘.sg•-, r-r.,'ii-2:•.Eii,•.0:0:t::,..M-It'-s-%;/"i';'"". -Tff iiii•.'1,-:3:'il'iii4li:INt' ',Iti..................................•:.E0IL.F:i j1 i-:'i'QPgfiti4. ::4R4'.tailifi!4.:10 4i.il•i•i-•,.','i'',.:,!:t',. .- m7.,..lieitiiii:tfititt43:4,4:4.1•4:i.4.!igii -Aba;..:;1::&4.,,,4,r.;111•.: 'itii.,.:;iii,.:;i.i..;:,,,ir, .:,i.f).4:4z,g5-41.1,!;;...aiti:,Ei!ii.:i,,v1=0:1&i,:.,q..-mfilliit ,a;:-..• .,••t! "Vi':::Irrat 7 :°4:4:•..,;tt,,.i..i.,Lrtti...i,,,,'''.gy"'A.,.I.,;olit'fi,4-tiarIF:Aliiiil,:.tii:i?.;.-4',ItIA, iregirdtfilgr0.11:9aartigIVOIII:': :ii,:::!EetttCPEP;rEfkl .85g.r4.'kvmkt,.yi.,,. 5,k=t7:A§t;&:initai.......sm.,k,-.4, ,...‘. .. , ,.... . ....„. - ............... ........... ....- . • I 1 • .i Z:- 4 ._... .-_____----- • . / / \ \ _ --....„....,_ i \ - 240 LF 12" CPEP/- __ _____ \ 0 2.98% / ..,,, . ..\. , • *-- -_ \ . -..„ \ 1 i \ ' \ \ • '--....„, \ : -...,.. \ 1 1 /\ . .• I i5 --,.....,,,,..._. -‘, t \ \ \ i 52 , 1 , \ . • \ , 's ...,.:.•.:::,.1'''' \\ '-... .,. . . 1 \ \ 12' WIDE PATHWAY ' 1 - \ : 1 W/2" ASPHALT CLASS 'B' \ \ 1 \ \ :° ! \ 'PAVEMENT OVER 2" CSTC. .#, \ ) \ SUBGRADE \ , . . .. -- , ....., \ k I \ \ • ,..- •.7 ." ,.. . CITY OF e•ems . • \)\) FWv (206) 00 -620 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 December 3, 1998 Mr.Malcolm McNaughton F L Polygon Northwest Company f 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 Re: Campus Glen Wetland Monitoring—File Number ILA90-PPO8 Dear Mr. McNaughton, This is in response to your November 24, 1998, letter. You have proposed to do the plantings (as recommended by Adolfson and Associates)this winter and monitor the new plantings and existing conditions again next fall at the end of the growing season. You have also requested assurance of a final sign off from the city next year if all new plantings are installed and growing. It is understandable that you would want to close off this project. The city's interest is also to bring this ongoing project to an end as long as the intent of the wetland mitigation plan is met. Based on our site visit, the intent of the mitigation plan is clearly not met at this time. If at the end of next year, there is indication that the intent of wetland mitigation plan is met and all new plantings (listed in the November 16, 1998, letter from Adolfson&Associates) are well established and no additional issues need to be addressed based on the review of next year's monitoring report,the project could get a final sign off from the city. However, final determination can only be made after the evaluation of the monitoring report prepared at the end of next year. If you have any additional questions, you can reach me by phone at 253-661-4082 or e-mail me at Minnie.Dhaliwal@ci.federal-way.wa.us. Sincerely, ' Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENTULA90 PP.08\PLANLTR I.DOC 1 G •�"�- f ---• - -- :-- .- z,. -: :\__. _- _• __ __ , „ a;�` s l \` \ 1 I SURFACE X • \ r 330 - Ate/ �' . - _ - -. �`� `\•,\� .\ 15' WIDE GERAVEL \\\ ` -- --- -- -- __ _ 330 If I I I ��— % %' ��.,^�� ACCESS ROAD O •~��\�_._.-- _-- -- - -------'"--- (_ 1 Ifr.`' ', / v "�\ . �` :, _'.tom -- —• "-z�- -_. -_-- 2 PE: nums_ r I i 1 f' E I co i j !,�o�• 4 I F . l ,� \�. 6' WIDE BERM IE=325.42 f 'w • `� • �� I i j I • I I I / I W/RIP RAP P < ` ``._ _ / 7 __----------- 1 / - / ‘,,:i .. . . .... , ..........„ z...:.,......... , .i.i v._ -.\,N. -,k, . ••••••_.. ...---_Qe_e_____- -.2-. 7t- I 111 w t,, 1 1 i • t , / \'\ \ \\ s- rpm ---- - �_. 10 gi 1W/I H 3 ill w \ %. � i.I I Y' I Z e , i, , LL, s \ ,. , ,,.... li W ,/le 0 ___ --../c- N., ri' \\.\ 11, , z 111ill ! ! i -� k; ;� h z� -� -moo f i/ill ='C'litCTG �'J t ./• li �' '� 1 a4. �- I , k l '� ` SU OOD PLAIN 11 `j I \ • 11 • (UN ' NTORIED WETLAND) Y j ' -- �� - ti .> 1 I Iii 1 1, 11:Ij f I i r ``i \ • • •1 Itu`=- �' '-yr •`\ ( itl:F\(\()) \11 p�}►� C' .2 +'O !,,,,, t.., ...,. . .....„.ex , ,,,,,,,,,,:../. . tEcIA • ILI III II I -: il i \i' '-1(-) -\\\ • . I I \0 -w a\\ \ • • r. ..:,..-----v----- --- / 7)6 , - e 3 1 / t5 ....---/ ' -------1 ---/ • ,, 2,., , .......... . , ,,,,, a .03 • 47 --% •'•) r/ k: / 7--f'D 1.&..e.______.. , - I 1 I 1 4) . ,..x . --N, • • • / 1 I '�� •n. • I �`>f' 4, 0--N )k)- 0 � .ci..\ �9.�C 4 1 V • • . / J /.r'_ / l✓ fT �/ \\`, '" 1 'I I I -� \ \ .`C . 4 • :1.7: `.�i I/ i 10 to i i 1 ( ` ,/,-- ge':-.1/ ‘(-/ ..,,, , , .,. I I I ) I 3$ 40' •••••....,...... .... cii) .. _..... . 4.'....°mu° ®""*".... , .....-"--, ' '02, ) L :0 .......„..._ __.....,....\,_ ) ,....„,.." :„..0_,..p.-20 „, II , , )(\''---,, ,,N(........., ."----..... -\""k vii 4'. 1 %;•2"--. .1",_ ""------'1° -----,--_-_ _ _ 1 Ii poi, J i / , ,, 1," 1 . ;r � ,_ \ >f3 ��- ��`- ; S�,r plc J � � •.: / I / 1�; 325 l E 324. �/ '-�' I ,• � k7 / ,k. • �j J f J ` ` `` � �\ i ' TO ccZ�/ l f3 44o �,�i� �/ �}� ( 1+°� �J1;;• , ,• } � ', € I J J c ` U�' 'a.., /�� G� O ��I �.0' I �K J L--' ' spy • X."} G J / ,;, r-ate.. u�,RR� _ -:=� ' E® ,,,_ -� P. • fl ,-• I• !� WII1� a� ..... �� *am.. t) ---- ^ = - - _-rs..,�`-1/4- .,1'fl Y' ,`0 ��.+� • • .' I }. ¢r`. i:E=324.63..•- 7 r.:2* #10... •• ...\"•,. # # , ''~\ �-� Y ..�.., . 611•1•,-.:, '."'"',...............7 ci U �' --�'l � • • .�` ! � ' W/TRASH ,FLACK // ,w.... - I i i / iC , • t'r 56 LF"� 18" CPEP I �� IE=323.78 • • • 1 0 4:47% f W TRASH RACK l �+•r .�; • ; I, ~'1,;, WATERSHED D NAm , Thic. Pest Office Box 215,Enumclaw,WA 98022 TEL;1.360.825.9253 FAX 1-360.825.9248 DATE: July 3, 2000 BARD COPY SENT X YES NO t PAGES; FAX COPY SENT X YES NO 36 SUBJECT: Final Mitigation Monitoring Report FAX 1.425.688.0500 E-MAIL na TO: Mr. Malcom McNaughton, Project Manager Polygon Northwest Company 11624 SE 5th Street, Suite 200 Bellevue, Washington 98005 FROM: Larry D. Burnstad, Principal Scientist PROJECT Campus Glen Residential Development NAME:. Federal Way, Washington PROJECT, WDI Project No. 98023AT NUMBER: Malcom— Attached are the results of the Year 2000 mitigation monitoring effort at the Campus Glen site. As noted in the letter report, the results are essentially good with all of the areas. In Tract C the buffer mitigation area around Transect C-1 is significantly improved over the conditions in 1998. The Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) planted in 1998 survived very well (1 dead out of 12 planted). The Douglas firs planted during the original mitigation plan implementation in 1995 are also doing very well. There were numerous cascara (Rhamnus purshiana), bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata), and red alder (Alms rubra) growing in the western portion of the Tract C buffer. In the area where the sewer line crosses through Tract C, the vegetative cover is excellent in most areas planted between 1995 and 1998. The western red cedar, salmonberry, Douglas fir, snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), and sword fern (Polystichum munitum) planted in 1998 have survived at the 80% to 90% level. In addition, there are numerous volunteer red alder, Oregon ash(Fraxinus latifolia), and western red cedar that are doing very well in this corridor. Tract E showing acceptable vegetative cover considering the number of plants missing from the original and subsequent planting efforts. As you know, many of the plants installed in this area mysteriously disappeared within a few days of being installed every time Tract E was planted. The plants that remained, including the larger Douglas fir planted in 1998, are in very good condition and growing very well (see Photo 23 and Photo 24). Memo to Malcom McNaughton—Page 1 Campus Glen Final Mitigation Monitoring Tract G is looking quite good with excellent survival and growth on the red-osier dogwood (Corpus stolonifera), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), and willow (Salix sp) cuttings. The red- osier dogwood planted in 1998 are doing better than expected and has exceeded the growth rate of those planted in 1996. The attached report provides a verbal description of the final monitoring review conducted by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. In addition, there are 50 photographs documenting the condition of all three mitigation areas. Overall, I think the mitigation effort has been successful including Tract E. As you will see when you review the pictures I have included with the report,the buffer areas in the Tract C and Tract G are doing very well and easily meet the plant cover goals. If you have any questions regarding the attached report or this memo, please call me at 1.360.825.9253. Memo to Malcom McNaughton—Page 2 Campus Glen Final Mitigation Monitoring Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring 2000 Letter Report Introduction The Campus Glen residential development, located in Federal Way, Washington (City), was completed in 1995. As part of the overall project, Polygon Northwest Company (Owner) was required to mitigate impacts to some of the wetland buffer areas within the project site. Specifically, those areas were portions of the buffers associated with Wetland C, Wetland G, and Wetland E. These mitigation areas were identified as Tract C, Tract E, and Tract G. Tract C is located on the east side and south side of Wetland C and is bounded on the south by South 331st Place. Tract E is located on the south side of Wetland E and lies between South 330th Place and the wetland. Tract G is south of the retention/detention pond, which is located south of the houses along South 330th Place. Originally planted in 1995, the mitigation tracts were previously evaluated in 1996, 1997, 1998, and again in 2000 (documented in this report). For a variety of reasons, the plants installed in 1995 did not fare well and plant survival was limited. As a result, the City and the Owner agreed upon an alternative, planting plan, which was implemented in 1997. Additionally, the City and the Owner agreed to continue the original five-year monitoring program that had an ending date of December 1999. That monitoring period required the Owner to monitor plant performance, in the mitigation tracts, in 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999. The monitoring reports were to be submitted to the City by October 31st each year. The mitigation areas were not monitored in 1999 but were instead monitored in June 2000. The June 2000 monitoring effort is the subject of this report. The Owner did not submit a monitoring report in 1995 but the City agreed to forego receipt of that report and count the 1996 report as the second report. This agreement was transmitted to the Owner in a December 23, 1996 memo from Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner for the City. Purpose The purpose of this report is to present the results of the 2000 monitoring effort completed by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. (WDI) on behalf of the Owner. The purpose of the monitoring effort is to evaluate the condition of the mitigation effort and to determine how well the objectives of the mitigation were met. This is the final mitigation monitoring report for the Campus Glen project. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 1 Methods WDI evaluated plants along transect lines within each of the three mitigation tracts. There were two transects established in Tract C: Transect C-1 on the south end of the tract and Tract C-2 along the east edge of the tract within the sewer line easement. In addition, there was one transect in Tract E located at the west end of the tract and one transect in Tract G located through the center of the pond. With the exception of Transect G-1 (located in Tract G), these transects were installed by WDI in 1997. Metal fence posts were driven into the ground at each end of each transect to identify the location of the transect. Wooden stakes were used to mark the center of permanent sample plots within each tract. Unfortunately, WDI was unable to find any of the permanent sample plot stakes (except those few that had been pulled out of the ground and thrown into the brush). In Tract G the metal fence posts had been removed prior to the 2000 monitoring visit and could not be located. As a result, WDI had to evaluate a new transect in the approximate location of the original Transect G-1. WDI selected monitoring points at random along the monitoring transects. Looking down the transect line from the beginning (located at 0 on a 100-foot tape) to the end of the transect (located at 100 on a 100-foot tape) the left side of the tape was left and the right side was right. Random sample points were selected by rolling two dice two times. The first roll determined the number of feet between any monitoring point and the previous point along the transect. The second roll determined the distance and direction from the transect centerline the center of the monitoring point was located. If the total of the two die was odd the point was left of the transect centerline, if the total was even the point was on the right of the transect centerline, and if the two numbers were the same the point was on the centerline. The distance from the transect centerline to the center of the sample point was equal to the number on the left die (if the total was odd) or on the right die (if the total was even). Each sample point had 3.3-foot radius and the dominant species within each point were noted. In addition to collecting data along the monitoring transects, WDI took photographs in each of the tracts to document the condition of the plants within each tract. These photos area attached to this report as Attachment 1. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 2 Results The following tables present the data collected at each of the randomly selected 3.3-foot radius sample plots: TRANSECT C-1 in TRACT C Plot;Point Plant, cis Common Name 0 Cover 4/L3 Epilobium augustifolium fireweed H=60 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(sapling) S=60 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry T=0 Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry 16/0 Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry H=60 Gaultheria shallon salal S=0 Rhamnus purshiana cascara T= 100 22/R1 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(sapling) H=60 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry S=0 Prunus emarginata bitter cherry T= 100 34/0 Epilobium augustifolium fireweed H= 100 Alnus rubra red alder(sapling) S=20 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry T=0 Holcus lanatus velvet grass 39/L3 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry H= 100 Holcus lanatus velvet grass S=0 Agrostis capillaris colonial bentgrass T=0 48/L5 Holcus lanatus velvet grass H= 100 Agrostis capillaris colonial bentgrass S=0 T=0 58/R4 Agrostis alba redtop bentgrass H= 100 Cirsium arvense Canada thistle S=0 Trifolium repens white clover T=0 69/L3 Epilobium augustifolium fireweed H= 100 Agrostis capillaris colonial bentgrass S=0 Agrostis alba redtop bentgrass T=0 81/0 Agrostis alba redtop bentgrass H=70 Holcus lanatus velvet grass S=40 Alnus rubra red alder(sapling) T=0 Prunus emarginata bitter cherry Agrostis alba redtop bentgrass % Cover is for each layer within the plot rather than for each plant species; H = herb layer (0' to 1' in height), S=shrub layer(1'to 12' in height;and T=tree layer(12'plus in height). Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 3 TRANSECT C-2 in TRACT C Plot Point Plant Species Common Name % Cover 8/R3 Fraxinus latifolia Oregon ash(sapling) H=80 Rubus laciniatus evergreen blackberry S=70 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry T=0 Agrostis sp bentgrass* 15/L1 Thuja plicata western red cedar(sapling) H=60 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry S=60 Gaultheria shallon salal T=0 25/R4 Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum H=30 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry S=90 Anus rubra red alder(sapling) T= 10 Salix sp willow 37/0 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry H= 100 Polystichum munitum sword fern S=50 Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood T= 10 Agrostis capillaris colonial bentgrass 44/R1 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry H=80 Agrostis sp bentgrass S=40 Holcus lanatus velvetgrass T=0 55/L5 Agrostis sp bentgrass H=90 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry S=30 Salix sp willow T= 10 63/R5 Agrostis sp bentgrass H= 100 Holcus lanatus velvetgrass S=35 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry T=0 Rubus laciniatus evergreen blackberry 75/0 Agrostis sp bentgrass H=80 Holcus lanatus velvetgrass S=50 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry T=0 81/R2 Alnus rubra red alder H=80 Malus fusca western crabapple S=50 Rubus laciniatus evergreen blackberry T=60 Agrostis sp bentgrass 90/L4 Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir H= 10 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry S=95 Rubus laciniatus evergreen blackberry T=30 % Cover is for each layer within the plot rather than for each plant species; H = herb layer (0' to 1' in height), S=shrub layer(1'to 12'in height;and T=tree layer(12'plus in height). Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 4 TRANSECT E in TRACT E Plot Point j Piant.Species Common Name %Cover 5/L2 Plantago lanceolata English plantain H=95 Carex sp sedge S=0 Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern T=30 Agrostis sp bentgrass Solanum americanum nightshade Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 13/0 Plantago lanceolata English plantain H= 100 Agrostis sp bentgrass S=0 Holcus lanatus velvetgrass T=0 22/L4 Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir H=65 Plantago lanceolata English plantain S=0 Agrostis sp bentgrass T=60 Holcus lanatus velvetgrass 32/R4 Agrostis sp bentgrass H= 100 Plantago lanceolata English plantain S=0 Alopecurus pratensis meadow foxtail T=0 Hypochaeris radicata cat's ear 40/R5 Agrostis sp bentgrass H= 100 (partially Plantago lanceolata English plantain S=0 mowed) Hypochaeris radicata cat's ear T=0 52/0 Agrostis sp bentgrass H= 100 Plantago lanceolata English plantain S=0 Hypochaeris radicata cat's ear T=0 56/L1 Acer circinatum vine maple H=80 Agrostis sp bentgrass S=40 Trifolium pratense red clover T=0 Plantago lanceolata English plantain 68/0 Vicia cracca bird's foot vetch H= 100 Agrostis sp bentgrass S=0 Plantago lanceolata English plantain T=0 Hypochaeris radicata cat's ear Holcus lanatus velvetgrass 80/0 Vicia cracca bird's foot vetch H= 100 Agrostis sp bentgrass S=0 Plantago lanceolata English plantain T=0 Holcus lanatus velvetgrass 87/L3 Alopecurus pratensis meadow foxtail H= 100 Agrostis sp bentgrass S=0 Sambucus racemosa red elderberry(dead) T=0 96/L4 Agrostis sp bentgrass H= 100 Plantago lanceolata English plantain S=0 Hypochaeris radicata cat's ear T=0 % Cover is for each layer within the plot rather than for each plant species; H = herb layer (0' to 1' in height), S=shrub layer(1'to 12'in height;and T=tree layer(12'plus in height). Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 5 TRANSECT G in TRACT G Plot.Point Plant Species Common Name %Cover 0/0 Agrostis sp bentgrass H= 100 Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry S=0 T=0 8/R3 Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood H= 100 Agrostis sp bentgrass S=20 Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry T=0 18/R6 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(seedlings) H=80 Spiraea douglasii spiraea(seedlings) S=0 Holcus lanatus velvetgrass T=0 Agrostis sp bentgrass 27/L5 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(seedlings) H=40 Spiraea douglasii spiraea(seedlings) S=0 mostly bare ground T=0 29/0 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(seedlings) H=40 Spiraea douglasii spiraea(seedlings) S=0 mostly bare ground T=0 32/L2 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(seedlings) H=40 Spiraea douglasii spiraea(seedlings) S=0 mostly bare ground T=0 42/R6 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(seedlings) H=40 Spiraea douglasii spiraea(seedlings) S=0 mostly bare ground T=0 52/0 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(seedlings) H=40 Spiraea douglasii spiraea(seedlings) S=0 Salix sp willow T=0 mostly bare ground recent inundation 60/R6 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(seedlings) H=40 Spiraea douglasii spiraea(seedlings) S=0 mostly bare ground T=0 recent inundation 70/0 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(saplings) H=80 Spiraea douglasii spiraea(seedlings) S=30 Salix sp willow(seedlings) T=0 Holcus lanatus velvetgrass some bare ground recent inundation 80/0 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(seedlings) H=75 Spiraea douglasii spiraea(seedlings) S=0 Carex obnupta slough sedge T=0 Carex stipata sawbeak sedge some bare ground recent inundation 91/L5 Populus trichocarpa cottonwood(seedlings/saplings) H=80 Spiraea douglasii spiraea(seedlings) S=40 Juncus effusus soft rush T=0 some bare ground % Cover is for each layer within the plot rather than for each plant species; H = herb layer (0' to 1' in height), S=shrub layer(1'to 12'in height;and T=tree layer(12'plus in height). Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 6 Conclusions and Recommendations The mitigation effort is doing well. Most of the plants appeared to be vigorous and putting on good growth (see attached photos). The buffer areas general appeared as they were intended in the original and altered design scenarios. TRACT C In Tract C there were two areas where the vegetation was not sufficiently dense to meet the mitigation goals and objectives. The first area is at the "entrance" to the emergency storm water outlet in Tract C. That area is approximately 5,000 square feet of compacted ground that is dominated by grasses and exotic herb species (weeds). In addition, there was not dense vegetation along the entire sewer line corridor located in the eastern portion of Tract C. The lack of dense vegetation over the sewer line in the Tract C was by design in response to a request from the Federal Way Water and Sewer District. The vegetation on each side of the sewer line is providing a substantial amount of cover, as is the volunteer red alder. RECOMMENDATION— TRACT C: There is an area in Tract C where the plant community is dominated by herb species and the shrub/tree species are not as dense enough to meet the mitigation objectives. This area is located at the southern edge of Tract C in the storm-drain maintenance access area. The ground was severely compacted in this location during the original construction because the area was designed for use as a "turn-around" for maintenance equipment. The Owner has planted some Douglas fir seedlings in this area in 1998. WDI recommends planting the following shrub and tree species to increase the overall plant density in this area: red flowering currant Ribes sanguineum 2-gallon 4 each snowberry Symphoricarpos albus 2-gallon 6 each baldhip rose Rosa gymnocarpa 2-gallon 8 each tall Oregon grape Mahonia aquifolium 2-gallon 8 each bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum 5-gallon 8 each western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla 5-gallon 4 each The plants listed above will be randomly planted by the Owner's landscaping contractor in the portion of Tract C designated by WDI. WDI will be on site during plant installation and planting site preparation. Each planting site selected will have grasses and other competing, non-native vegetation removed as part of the site preparation. In addition the ground in the immediate area of each plant location will be scarified or manipulated to remove compaction to a depth that is at a minimum 12 inches deeper than the bottom of the normal planting pit. All planting pits will be oversized to allow the addition of organic compost or mulch in the pit and around the plant after planting. The mulch is added to improve site conditions and increase percentage of plant survival. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 7 TRACT E Tract E is getting significant natural regeneration of red alder. The primary problems in this area were extensive human use (possibly even the removal of whole plants), poor soils, and southern exposure. The first two were essentially corrected by erecting signs and by adding soil amendment to the on-site soils where new trees or shrubs were planted. Unfortunately some of the Douglas fir planted in 1998 disappeared before the signs could be installed. The signs are still in place and appear to be having the desired affect. The mitigation goals for the project are being met in Tract E as well as can be expected following the planting the Douglas fir trees in the fall of 1998. Those trees that were left in place have survived and appear to be growing well. RECOMMENDATIONS — TRACT E: Because of the harsh site conditions in this location WDI is recommending that _ 15 more Douglas fir be planted in this area. These should be 6- foot to 8-foot trees to reduce the risk of having the trees disappear. Each location selected for planting should be scarified to remove competing vegetation and manipulated to a depth at least 12 inches deeper than the bottom of the planting pit. Mulch or organic compost should be placed in the planting pit and around the plant to increase moisture retention, improve drainage, and increase available nutrients to those plants. TRACT G WDI has concluded that Tract G is performing well and should be considered successful in meeting the original mitigation objectives. WDI has no recommendations for increased planting in this area because the native plant community appears to be colonizing the site as rapidly as the fluctuating water levels in the pond will allow. One final note. The plants proposed for installation in Tract C and Tract E should not be planted until late October or early November when soil moisture is suitable for planting. The Owner may need to develop a plan for irrigating these plants during the first summer following plant installation. Following consultation with WDI staff the landscape contractor will determine the need for irrigation or supplemental watering within the mitigation areas. If you have any questions regarding this 2000 Mitigation Monitoring Report for the Campus Glen Development, please call Larry D. Burnstad at 1.360.825.9253 (Watershed Dynamics, Inc.). Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Page 8 ATTACHMENT 1 MITIGATION MONITORING RIN PHOTOS Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 1 _ PHOTO #1: Photo at left is a Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga -, c_ menziesii) seedling planted in u' : 4J 1998. This seedling was ' i'' * planted in area where soil was `,,, severely compacted during the #, . �' a"�'t construction of the storm '' , ' `�'` drainage system in Tract C. h ,{; m 4 = �� Fw4. C ti ' K ' I.( PHOTO #2: Photo below is view looking northeast along ' Transect C-1 from Transect V . , Point 32. s. i ' * w �� S' *:4•:" .* ,k,%*.A*-,,. kly'.' . i * • 's ,- 4 34.4 . / 4 / R �� \ 6 i 1 I I I / . -- 1 4 ' / .,o- z 11/1. 7 l +v — �. r / '• ,.. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 2 t. NOO O r y: 4 r3 C) t • + rRt ' mo'', _4:4;��' •�1y1. ,.tsf A'te ar Cd 4 .--1 - '-: Li-.. -„ 4s)ii, ,.ir, 4 ::',A'''.- . : --_,... ' ,- E. 7., 0,„_ + a * " y `e �� N l. A.' _ a a r ♦.. 1•> /h' \ �ti.h ,l.; 'a" y I a) •44 fy /�� . . k rs t ° VI U v r. 0 " i a . /r`/' O ' (Vf .� r . . r 1i♦ T yI a tril �; \ ., C ° CL) CD ,,y�. , a a Campus Glen —Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 3 e Le lW t-4 - ` ,R, :`. rub,! -' -, / _ J rr N vi .? �e 4 ` A �: , - + O � fr 7 i ( a' O 1 k litP.., 1 ..4 ›. ,,, ,.. , 4•' - •)7. i.. $Ref k • O N , ' .Cs1 ee cd Q •. . '''' `,. ' ' " 4. t s czt r 1 H CI , t1 t or , . , t 00 . , ....f.,:i.,: n Ch 31t� �", ` 0\3., 11% M'' 4. ::i v < i 1 i 0 Ct 'Li 1 1 t 3 y4 4 . 1 •." aQ '' � w# t Ls ",j C 'p I A�F 't r. f ,+moo,. / ` ' '� U 0101* .r - /t; �1k, VI 1 . ' O ^4-4O 1 \ t �' al/ 0 . N yN s +, « O o = 0� f E. f O ,., H Y , Campus Glen—Final MitigationPhoto MonitoringDocumentation—ReportPage4 ' PHOTO #7: Photo at left A " shows the wetland buffer in '"„ ;, ` ,.� '�`'� _ .. Tract C as viewed from the � ", `_ '"► '�` {'' r yard adjacent to Transect C-1. 4 ` ' t '� �_ ' The area shown is between 4� ' t - .. — Transect Point 0 (west end of .4 - Transect C-1 and Transect ,a,..2t.„. rs s r , It t yp+r,`; gip,.,� � '��.• i."' r" vl S` \ y �« ` •�� tom` , M." +4 Q.� .g.....(v - . ‘ -1--::,,F.,-.A. ,Air r*, . , rrZ*-r.frrr �S 74 .P` fly Sl1 t I PHOTO #8: Photo below is a r view looking southwest along the southern edge of Tract C from a point approximately halfway between Transect C-1 and Transect C-2. This view is 180 degrees away from the "" view in Photo#9. •.ate -S'" . •: _ a _ . ii., . ,0-,.. ,, • ,,,,,,-0 , - ' , 1 ,. p .. , .....,_ _, ___, '1 I ...__ , ,is,,�'"4 { :v, " 1 r • 1 •'CV Li a 1 \ Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 5 t ,. t •, + o cri si *. 'r. ° -e w . C O N 1IIE ' tom '�'l 0*AtI - Q 0 g' °ti+ � -'' k cad cd -''''';''', '''r*1 • e '1 AO& ' :" . S iv,....._,4.. ., E .._.„ . it. ,r, i„.:i , ,,, . k i1 r,. '� /� . - Q"� I U a' 4 r` , , , `- `` C o 1� O• 5... -- 1-1 44:! -..., ,,,1 .*146— ''- I'''''' >7.A:k‘'",;(..''' --- t -'" - --s'it",,•*".z..----; F1 r .rrt!� J ' '• -3i s _ . . .„ tie k k • . '.,+ s a aaat)is lr ii" t `. R it :JrE _ cd at e at" s" i S X S k a.. • = z L.)rr. O >C ¢. a. • O m AP,' II { x O ¢" �� - ' cd . E.-1 Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 6 --iA l.!,7..-'4.'.,,it,I.,._:.,tZ.A r'"N..'\:.'4.--/„b_s0- 7(1aa(c1,›,-:/4,))4. (."1—..0—:- r f+r; O ' O r;, w — ., '"51 , t es O oat.).) ` f } i f r .. ,,,t.... - r �`_ _ 7 Q-i ice.' N CA ,, . _ ., : _ , r„ N i / �t � -._l�,r� .r,� bk„ ... '.wr.i >-w _.� „ • IA^I ..., . , ::,. ./ .„, .. ,_,,,..s. „, fil:. : -....,... • •:,.. „. ....._.._ . .. ,,, ›O { t: 4., __ U o t - s. ti `Mu f 4 ✓ I O ,,,,,Luicat„. 1,,,4,,,t:•,:#..- '.. ...,.t ,.., ._,,it ' .a, , ' :,c''''d . .*:'NV 7001 4. �` rti �� + yt i +a a �` / O Z% t `� kb, u r+ 1% 4 a o y _ 7. ` , '"-.,".:',-.;.':--"-tA,.. .'111 .. 4. et: kl t 1, N die Pi ,-.....,H Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 7 '' . r psi PHOTO#13: Photo to left :•� � , 4 �,r ;4.,.r shows vegetation growing in the .fi f a ; r :a :_ sewer line corridor on the east N side of Tract C. Salmonberry i r r (Rubus spectabilis) and western ° `` red cedar(Thuja plicata) were } ` ' planted by Owner. Both species 1t* .44 are over 6 feet in height. • tormr. t ...* , At N _ �� .mom � w "4r�r M f C 0 w ,00 "1 _. ! . ..A . .0"": ,. - PHOTO#14: Photo below is a '�' t y ,. •• = view looking north along the 0 , ' ,. }._ sewer line corridor in Tract C ille\ ,:. r �‘ from the north end of Transect • • -t, ... ' C-2. Note the numerous red ' - •' alder (Alnus rubra) saplings that \ have volunteered. There are 111 Idikor numerous seedlings under those , r y ' w r s[ ;. + �4 2_ eV r_ ' •.!� ._ • . 4 a.., _ ,: S. • .i It yo Y.' .`..' . r w t F1.. �AP4. ' y '.+tea _ 3'. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 8 %N.._ �� f .*2 le" -.r .." '�.�` ✓ 1 d. e R --tea" ..- 4 - - PHOTO #15: Photo above is view looking northwest from the north end of Transect C-2. This is view of sewer line corridor in the eastern part of Tract C. Both natural and human-aided revegetation has been successful in meeting mitigation goals. 4 i y�r .14,^kuZt . �+,' r lg.. Ni. a, \ \ • { w. "- % 4 'P4 • . / .-1.. -.4, •:.:' - ,A-.7 4-, ....; - ,,,,,,, ° -, .:4,°,tv. - — i e y Rc r ' " •` °--.' 1., t.',,Nt ,, , ;- ...,,,,f',11: •f f • 'may 4 ' . t i 4 �' - PHOTO #16: Photo above is view looking northwest along the sewer line corridor in Tract C from approximately the 80-foot mark on Transect C-2. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 9 — — 4. � ter • ~ 4 , �' ;Alb .7tt' r. i1/4 _ e. , Y " t -' es . I t. o IS fir ... • I v v .t ;`:. PHOTO#17: Photo above is view looking southeast from transect point 80 feet on Transect C-2. Note large red alder(Alnus rubra) sapling in foreground. eif -f—..,- 4,,.. s a- j , � 1 'f',.;,,,--;',"il, , „ '::4,:.4.' '''''et`,777::,,," N +s r' + , s,� 1}_ 4-4t - _*' u� F i a uv PHOTO#18: Photo above is view looking east northeast along Transect E-1 form the west end of the transect. Note Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii) and seedling big-leaf maple(Acer macrophyllum) along left side of transect centerline. Campus Glen =Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 10 ,' �, 1 �\ ,v_ ' {; Ni,. 4 i \ ! '` t y s e� s„fir d.2 �. s _ i' s 4 ,4. i f , . '� -1 Y PHOTO #19: Photo above shows wild rose(Rosa sp)on left side of Transect E- 1 centerline between transect points 33 feet and 37 feet. 4.4 - I _ z . 11 - tea' ,is Y A f � �� ,.�y;r., aII AV fr.. 1 { % t ill ., 1 Ni.,. it 1 / , - . i , PHOTO #20: Photo above is view looking east northeast from transect point 49 feet along Transect E-1. Note vine maple (Acer circinatum) on left side of transect center line (100-foot tape). Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report , Photo Documentation—Page 11 PHOTO #21: Photo at left is view of vine maple (Ater '° `1= circinatum} located on left side �' .�x of Transect E-1 at Plot Point 56. s#� ' Note dense cover of grass s .^ r species as well as other herbaceous vegetation. L v : _ , \ ' ', AI \ �l— 7 /J PHOTO #22: Photo below is ' view looking east southeast from the east end of Transect E-1. ' ;k , �c F ,I d 4114 try uu 1 - Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 12 ' : +, MO • . --..r, ''''. ____..___itiosj. **-- 111601, 11!11 a S' 1 I. r - + .\ vi, Z S -' y ,Rt,f, PHOTO #23: Photo above is a view looking west southwest from a point approximately 75 feet east of the east end of Transect E-1. Some vine maple (Acer circinatum) and wild rose (Rosa sp)have survived41, '- ;- `. 'V1= —.E.4ge .. r.. it 4 y .„ _� '� ` - =- fik �FF: - a I •_a_t PHOTO #24: Photo above is view looking west southwest from a point approximately 150 feet east of the east end of Transect E-1. Note larger Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)that have survived. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 1• • y .1 . -• PHOTO #25: Photo at left is a ,. view from the street looking • ! ¢ `�` • into the Tract E buffer . - 5- mitigation area. Note sign indicating wetland and wetland - -:=*, " s 'i , " buffer to be protected. t ,4 c. •, a. . � , . .' 'It' !• `, a- ` 'r "7 � ;.� - ram. - PHOTO #26: Photo below is { ' - a view looking northwest from the west end of Transect G-1. Note cottonwood(Populus trichocarpa) and willow(Salix • '` �` * , `" sp) saplings in foreground. ' ♦ ' rI J� a ""It , • e°itY ua .• �. yr: i W 'ill ey a .r, a ' !,' ,ot"''.,.,: 'Hwy ' s"4 .* "a.. • 3 / N' L II '�., �#- r ,a Firti >« ,. .- ` , - ' ` �. ` . ..' - ,, . f -+m_ i .Z a t - a Rw � a F K a i r `t ,d4k0 Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 14 . 01- 1 qp.r,5 T v ir- , . • - r , --.- klo... • . .-4 17rA fib's . -1 • " "s "L rfl.; . .- . _ , - it t , it .' - is , • 1 - 1114 4 i A , . .. .: , .. . t i I . I , ...... .,„ PHOTO #27: Photo above is a view looking north from the west end of Transect G-1. Note the willow(Salix sp) and cottonwood(Populus trichocarpa) saplings along the edge of the pond area in Tract G. : ,•41r.,, i.,, , , • , ,.. .• ... -....• .. !....• " )1.-. •*, i ,- • ' ' ,,,s1,-•• a" • ;,..- 1,,?3: -- ••• . .... i . Nob, S. 0.; 0.7. ' 0. , ' ‘,J '404011\ • , . . ). ' t , • t -_ ' . 1$F , ,A :...0,<,•..1 , .., . ..4 I •.. r ilkl. -‘4' 6,.. . `,I ; , , a .:- .13' -_,.-1-t• A -4, . . ' ,.. •••,,',.. '' ' ol:, ',.., ,, 4.4. .0.,,, ... "" 1., ' .- '.•7 ......,:: —...-...,.. "1„1""4)..,-- ji.-.. . ''‘"....-, .4-"%. ."-s;.". * -"--- ,......e.' , 't , ,:-. - -, ..7„„r-i „,• -:s -- ,... • --., ' ..- PHOTO#28: Photo above is a view looking northeast from the west end of Transect G-1. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 15 II 7 "* `" • `4, �e _ i {., o j4 4 . _ I? --, z y : PHOTO #29: Photo above is view looking east across pond area in Tract G from west end of Transect G-1. Note willow (Salix sp) and cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) growing in some areas of pond bottom. `, z- s,,.?0 . ... - . . ,, • :, ' • .. t ' liJe' f'f Y ‘"' . + a / , ii c.:16 W';. Icie 4, i r ?.. . awe;;• " Pr t mow:. • = F1 .• e. ' :` F, .. s• .c� ' `fix. — ' ; "" .' '' .r+l� y �F1 . .• --e a•r t 1• ", m. , I I tl 1-1 PHOTO #30: Photo above is view looking southeast from the west end of Transect G-1 into the planted and natural buffer areas. Note Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in center of photo that was planted in 1995. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 16 . w ,• PHOTO #31: Photo at left .�r , shows red-osier dogwood r (Cornus stolonifera) growing °" `'. , '�A4:01 C along the southern edge of the pond area in Tract G. Some of the red-osier dogwood was planted in the fall of 1998. •'' ,_ ,..,... - a; • . .,..... iY � , , . ......„,_ „.... -4, ,,,c=-V «, --.,, , 0„. - "... .. �. , a....L r,• �F x • / 14. fir'' S 3 M - yw+ as:: .rr ' . ✓" ..) r ,�p. �` f:' , `� PHOTO #32: Photo below is .{ , , f11 '.' * t * k ,,,. . ', a view looking northwest from µ ` ' " the east end of Transect G-1. . � Note the homes in the �� > background. These homes are - `� ', ? ''111.�'ii part of the Campus Glen ,, '� development. There are " .. ' ; apartments located to the west a. .1- 1,s , of the pond area. — .-'._ .--.. ' ''‘,-. .. ,, :2,:i, * „.111k. ' . . .., ,. t , .;:41040". 'k" 4 .1":".?:,_.4‘,. ',' rf:- ' ''t,':,:\ .. ' ..- 4 , � F 1 .ii .-."-^T...F'. ' Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 17 r'Y• - lg. , '4,, -.,:ter V,- - _. r r. N -,t r roe t ill." 4If -, , i . -cf.:. 4,- ~ 7+-- Silky a €+9k I ~i '0C PHOTO #33: Photo above is view looking northeast from the east end of Transect G-1. Note willow(Salix sp) and cottonwood(Populus trichocarpa) growing on bank around northeast end of pond area in Tract G. `? -c - t 'A. . • - ' _ _ ..1.�!. N.,<' #- - y l _ — s.: • { Y•a• f -•H — - - /+ I , i,, : r•. 1C/ , ,* dl- . / _ +;t ,. ' PHOTO#34: Photo above is a view looking east from the east end of Transect G-1. Note western red cedar(Thuja plicata) growing along edge of Tract G pond. Cedar was planted in 1997. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation - Page 18 Aire � _ `` t Al ma - •` .. 1 J 1 r..1 PHOTO #35: Photo above shows view looking southeast into vegetation along the southeastern edge of the pond area in Tract G. Note red-osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) and cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa). .. 4n_". may p _R ,`\,1. .' tie `. t ,0' i / .. .., N i, . PHOTO #36: Photo above is view looking southwest at southern edge of pond area in Tract G from the east end of Transect G-1. Campus Glen-FinaPhotol Mitigation MDocumentationonitoring-Page Report . .., w-k , `... N. ♦ h 1t - <', '' - - �' M a 3f x •� �..,,.4 •-" � .�a �,x t� "' a .. ct� -I '. .-� a 4 lwr. f 1 _ PHOTO #37: Photo above is a view looking west from the -- .x � t ,__, east end of Transect G-1. •-` �__ Transect ns east/west in bottom of ruTract G pond. _ .1s.• - - i .. M. 1 'st. .\ } r r �'`:� ` PHOTO : to left t - shows area#38 of sloughPhoto sedge r ` ` '' (Carex obnupta) rwi� _ .s - .. low area of pond g boottomng in � approximately the 15eas feet north s " • - t end of �� Transect G-1. • Y , • 1- - r a Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 20 r : w ,t'r) A- t ; f. ~tern t. % ,'r,r " .+' ,s' ,, - PHOTO #39: Photo above shows slough sedge (Carex obnupta)growing in low area near the northeast end of the Tract G pond. Note the willow(Salix sp) growing on the bank. * 2 ! ✓ .- bra •ce $ 4.0 i n ---,44,-,..,...4 z,_ --*-5*<•.--, Y t4 1 J ._.. .xd:l PHOTO # 40: Photo above shows fire ring at the east end of the Tract G pond area. Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 21 ,, • • 1 'rt- +' •,` \� w iy sir. slii .0, y S i ',. Z R'AY l".i`S`3LF yid. 1. k v .10 { PHOTO#41: Photo above shows cut ends of trees that have been fallen =� into the pond area in Tract G. This is �, : ca evidence of young people's activities within the mitigation area. g Yt. j rtt �ai k�✓ � '+4, �a .cram♦�� ,F �.rJCX,pl; R t` 'F:Y. n;_ ._� ..+ '..'.",.,* v;,i ' ttit., + s,4 ". /ate~ 'r w� .• 3 �' , �. N ;ir, fir:t t 4 . �1 p d S 0� 0 s - :--"'elii‘'LA'.:.;,,,,:'11-t.,....,4!''(::,,,,,'',..,.,' \ *s ys.4 ciff >4 .t •' PHOTO #42: Photo to the left . , ' . ��+ iati ri l 5,� shows typical vegetation in the won ` • 'lb. t,' ,'. � 'kv, �� :, southeast portion of the pond in Tract ' Z:-�a, . t i4 xg, Pt G. Both inundation and human ' , 4 ...,( k i *44'` 's , ,, activities have caused plant growth in .4 t *. .� t ,� ';t,4a , ` ,- „ -� , 1 the pond area to be constrained. 1 -- . ✓� i j S 1 Campus Glen — Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 22 o 4 t ,4 1"l +41 1` i O Y� i 1 4. 4 f r op I 4 Q a ri�jM Ln G\ N Ii �`Y U i B 51 � z) t H 1 I '1.1`` ,-•'''.. � '�cci..• Rt y. - '} 0 • FL,' -S'- .Y o r >% 1, s "' z . ." O CJ I Mi z7 t , ilzr 4t 0 C 0 • a 0 Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 24 PHOTO #47: Photo at left shows typical vegetation in bottom of Tract G pond at the east end of Transect G- ,' ' r_, 1. l .)4....)fr. 1 ::: ,,,,s,-.,,,,-., t ii` efts w° ?ai s� a 1 J .•1 � 'NA, t ��A_ a ..aea. ��-c��Z "- �wf'.�' s 1... €�.�.. . t� In 4 r.ems �''P ; � r- a .t*ti� ,fib �� y �` �'' t• 7,4r .t"4 s �"� "r'�� ' �-. 2Fi` a ',�- i � $2,�r � �+ nit * r e ,• Et all a'f ti"•@ 4 y�4. z'14a ...: ;d flf`1° 6r� �s. {fit rg' "* -0t .F i S- b1 � .• t F ', • \ k7j =,4,w . { 4 _ ' �" PHOTO #48: Photo below shows �1 ' . red-osier dogwood(Corpus y- --�• stolonlfera) growing along southern edge of pond area in Tract G. These red-osier dogwood were planted in the fall of 1998. • • :" Ite 4 r °'tom Y ,ic, 'a ''S"! 1 r + ir d t ","o. :I"' • q Campus Glen—Final Mitigation Monitoring Report Photo Documentation—Page 25 PHOTO #49: Photo at left shows typical area in the bottom of pond in Tract G. Until recently this area ... was inundated. Note new Spiraea _ douglasii and Populus trichocarpa seedlings as well as Carex stipata. .+y�", ,;r 3 b a. v w T> �.Jt 1�, �:-.ke'e*.•c *'t r \14,, u. a, %, + r. ;. -I. t .'t w' '1? =i,. „4410ip f PHOTO #50: Photo below shows another area of recent inundation near west end of pond area in Tract `' G. Note the emergent seedlings. ' fie1 I N' d -111r4 • , ? y 1 k -p s ktac/ 2-� 19 9 b Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring 1998 Letter Report Introduction The Campus Glen residential development, located in Federal Way, Washington (City), was completed in 1995. As part of the overall project, Polygon Northwest Company (Owner) was required to mitigate impacts to some to the wetland buffer areas within the project area. Specifically, those areas were portions of the buffers associated with Wetland C, Wetland G, and Wetland E. These mitigation areas were identified as Tract C, Tract E, and Tract G. Tract C is located on the east side and south side of Wetland C and is bounded on the south by South 331st Place. Tract E is located on the south side of Wetland E and lies between South 330th Place and the wetland. Tract G is south of the retention/detention pond, which is located south of the houses along South 330th Place. Originally planted in 1994, the mitigation tracts were previously evaluated in 1996, 1997, and again in 1998 (documented in this report). For a variety of reasons, the plants installed in 1995 did not fare well and plant survival was limited. As a result, the City and the Owner agreed upon an alternative, planting plan, which was implemented in 1997, and agreed to retaining the original five-year monitoring program. That monitoring period required the Owner to monitor plant performance, in the mitigation tracts, in 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999. The monitoring reports were to be submitted to the City by October 31 st each year. The Owner did not submit a monitoring report in 1995 but the City agreed to forego receipt of that report and count the 1996 report as the second report. This was related to the Owner in a December 23, 1996 memo from Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner for the City. This report deals primarily with the results of the new planting plan, which was installed in 1997. The report does comment, however, on the survival of the originally installed plants as well. This report is the fourth monitoring report required by the City, leaving only one additional year of monitoring and report preparation to occur in 1999. Purpose The purpose of this report is to present the results of the 1998 monitoring effort completed by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. (WDI) on behalf of the owner. The purpose of the monitoring effort is to evaluate the condition of the mitigation effort and to determine how well the objectives of the mitigation are being met. Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring 1998 Letter Report-Page 1 Methods To determine how well the mitigation effort was performing, WDI used previously established 100-foot transects within each tract as reference for the 1998 and 1999 monitoring visits. These were permanent transects installed by WDI in 1997. There are permanent sample plots along each of the 100-foot transects as well as observation points selected at random during each monitoring trip. In addition to collecting data along the monitoring transects, WDI used previously established photo points within each tract to allow a photographic record to be maintained throughout the remainder of the performance monitoring period. Finally, WDI conducted a complete count of all of the plants installed in Tract E in 1997 because it appeared that some of the plants might have been missing from the tract. In addition, because of the proximity of this tract to residences located across the street, it appeared that some of the plants might have been trampled and, as a result, died. Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring 1998 Letter Report—Page 2 Results The following tables present the data collected at each of the permanent (3-foot radius) sample plots and random locations observed: TRANSECT C-1 in TRACT C Plot# Plant Species Common Name % Cover 0.0 Poa spp. blue grass* H= 100 Festuca spp. fescue* S=0 Agrostis spp. bentgrass* T=0 Alopecurus sp. foxtail* Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern Gaultheria shallon salal 11.0 Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern H= 100 Gaultheria shallon salal S=0 grasses T=0 14.7® Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir(seedling) 23.0 Polystichum munitum Sword fern H= 100 grasses S=0 T=0 28.7® Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir(sapling) 40.0 grasses H= 100 S=0 T=0 49.0 Salix spp. willow H=50 Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry S=5 Alnus rubra red alder T=0 grasses rocks(50%of plot) 58.0 Populus trichocarpa black cottonwood H= 100 grasses S=50 T=0 71.0 Rhamnus purshiana cascara H=70 Gaultheria shallon salal S=30 Epilobium angustifolium fireweed T=0 Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry grasses boulder(30%of plot) 83.0 Gaultheria shallon salal H= 100 Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry S=20 grasses T=0 92.0 Cytisus scoparius Scotch broom(1 plant) H= 100 Gaultheria shallon salal S=20 Epilobium angustifolium fireweed T=0 Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry grasses Plot numbers in bold type are permanent plots. *Collectively referred to as grasses. % Cover is for each layer within the plot rather than for each plant species; H = herb layer (0' to 1' in height), S=shrub layer(1' to 12' in height;and T=tree layer(12' plus in height). Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring 1998 Letter Report—Page 3 TRANSECT C-2 in TRACT C Plot# Plant Species Common Name % Cover 0.0 Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum H= 100 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry S=50 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry T=0 Holcus lanatus velvet grass* Poa spp. blue grass* Festuca spp. fescue* Agrostis spp. bentgrass* Alopecurus spp. foxtail* 9.0 Fraxinus latifolia Oregon ash(seedlings) H= 100 Thuja plicata western red cedar(sapling) S=30 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry T=0 grasses 24.0 Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood H= 100 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry S=20 Epilobium angustifolium fireweed T=0 grasses 36.0 Thuja plicata western red cedar H= 100 Salix spp. willow S=50 Anus rubra red alder T= 10 Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood Rubus spectabilis salmonberry Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry grasses 51.0 Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir(dead) H= 100 Salix spp. willow S= 10 Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry T=0 grasses 61.0 Anus rubra red alder(seedlings) H= 100 Acer circinatum vine maple S=30 Vaccinium parvifolium red huckleberry T=0 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry grasses 73.0 Prunus emarginata bitter cherry H= 100 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry S=35 Vaccinium parvifolium red huckleberry T=0 grasses 86.0 Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir H=80 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry S=50 grasses T=0 95.0 Cornus stolonifera red osier dogwood H=90 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry S= 15 grasses T=0 Plot numbers in bold type are permanent plots. *Collectively referred to as grasses. % Cover is for each layer within the plot rather than for each plant species; H = herb layer (0' to 1' in height),S=shrub layer(1' to 12' in height;and T=tree layer(12' plus in height). Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring 1998 Letter Report—Page 4 TRANSECT E in TRACT E Plot# Plant Species Common Name % Cover 1.0 Plantago lanceolata English plantain H=85 Hypochaeris radicata cat's ear S=0 Poa spp. blue grass* T=0 Festuca spp. fescue* Agrostis spp. bentgrass* Alopecurus spp. foxtail* Cytisus scoparius Scotch broom Tsuga heterophylla western hemlock(dead) 4.0® Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir(seedling) 10.0 Plantago lanceolata English plantain H=65 Hypochaeris radicata cat's ear S=0 grasses T=0 19.0® Acer circinatum vine maple 23.0 Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir(sapling) H=50 Plantago lanceolata English plantain S=5 grasses T=0 36.5® Acer circinatum vine maple 45.0 Alnus rubra red alder(3 seedlings) H=40 grasses S=0 T=0 49.0® Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir(sapling) 58.0® Vaccinium parvifolium red huckleberry 60.5® Vaccinium parvifolium red huckleberry 63.0® Acer circinatum vine maple(dead) 69.0 Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir(sapling) H= 100 grasses S=0 T=0 77.0® Rosa spp. wild rose(dead) 84.0® Rosa spp. wild rose 92.0 Rosa spp. wild rose H=90 Acer circinatum vine maple(dead) S=0 T=0 Plot numbers in bold type are permanent plots. *Collectively referred to as grasses. % Cover is for each layer within the plot rather than for each plant species; H = herb layer (0' to 1' in height), S=shrub layer(1' to 12' in height;and T=tree layer(12' plus in height). Total plant count in Tract E: wild rose = 23, Douglas fir = 7 seedlings and 6 saplings (and 1 dead), vine maple = 5 (and 2 dead), huckleberry = 8, snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus)= 5, and hawthorne (Crataegus douglasii)= 8. Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring 1998 Letter Report—Page 5 TRANSECT G in TRACT G Plot# Plant Species Common Name % Cover 5.0 Salix spp. willow H=75 Poa spp. blue grass* S=20 Festuca spp. fescue* T=0 Agrostis spp. bentgrass* Alopecurus spp. foxtail* 8.0® Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood 14.0 Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood H=85 Salix spp. willow S=25 grasses T=0 17.0® Salix spp. willow grasses 26.0 Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood H=85 Salix spp. willow S=35 grasses T=0 35.0 Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood H=80 Salix spp. willow S=30 grasses T=0 39.0® Salix spp. willow grasses 47.0 Salix spp. willow H=90 grasses S=40 T=0 66.0 Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood H=80 Salix spp. willow S=45 grasses T=0 74.0® Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood grasses 85.0 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry H=95 Salix spp. willow S= 15 grasses T=0 92.0® grasses 97.0 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry H=95 Salix spp. willow S= 15 grasses T=0 Plot numbers in bold type are permanent plots. *Collectively referred to as grasses. % Cover is for each layer within the plot rather than for each plant species; H = herb layer (0' to 1' in height), S=shrub layer(1' to 12' in height;and T=tree layer(12' plus in height). Note: There were some sedges (Carex spp.) and some black cottonwood seedlings growing in the ponded area (now dry), but for the most part, the pond area was unvegetated. The west end of the pond was the least vegetated primarily due to the heavy use by humans (presumably young humans). The willow cuttings planted in 1997 had about a 50% survival on the south side due to exposure, inundation, and removal. Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring 1998 Letter Report—Page 6 Conclusions and Recommendations The mitigation effort is doing well. Most of the plants appeared to be vigorous and putting on good growth (see attached photos). The buffer areas general appeared as they were intended in the original and altered design scenarios. The lack of dense vegetation over the sewer line in the Tract C was by design in response to a request from the Federal Way Water and Sewer District. The only exception to the successful mitigation effort is Tract E. The east end of Tract E is getting significant natural regeneration of red alder. There is some Scotch broom and Himalayan blackberry invading this area, which the Owner has committed to remove as means of increasing the viability of the native plant community. The primary problems are extensive human use (possibly even the removal of whole plants), poor soils, and southern exposure. The first two can be corrected by erecting signs and by adding soil amendment to the on-site soils where new trees or shrubs will be planted. The third item is not resolvable and accounts for the poor condition of the vine maple planted in the tract. For Tract E. WDI would recommend adding soils amendment in pits where additional Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) sapling (15 plants, 4' to 6' in height, not sheared) would be planted. Fir should be planted no closer than within 5 feet of the sidewalk and on 20 foot spacing. If these plants are planted in late spring or early summer, they should be irrigated throughout the wanner months (from planting time through September). If, however, they are planted in the fall, irrigation should not be necessary unless soil moisture becomes depleted (plants exhibit wilting). WDI has concluded that Tract C and Tract G are performing well and do not need any additional plantings. The mitigation goals for the project are being met. Tract E should come up to the same level of performance following the planting the Douglas fir trees in the fall of 1998. It appears likely, barring any unforeseen trauma, that the mitigation tracts will continue to meet their intended performance standards and that the 1999 monitoring effort, once reported, will fulfill the Owner's obligation for mitigating impacts on this project. If you have any questions regarding this 1998 Mitigation Monitoring Report for the Campus Glen Development, please call Larry D. Burnstad at 1.253.735.4288 (Watershed Dynamics, Inc.). Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring 1998 Letter Report—Page 7 1998 Monitoring Report— Campus Glen Photo Documentation—Monitoring Transects TRANSECT PHOTO or PHOTO NO. POINT PHOTO DESCRIPTION 1 Cl-A View from east end of Transect Cl looking southwest. Note grassed area in photo center is to remain as grass to allow parking for maintenance vehicles. 2 C 1-A View looking west from east end of Transect C l. Tape is stretched along edge of mitigation buffer area. 3 Cl View of volunteer black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) growing in mitigation buffer. 4 Cl View of Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius) which is an invasive plant. This plant is a common invader in disturbed areas. 5 Cl View looking east from the storm drain located at the edge of the mitigation area. 6 -- This is a view of the area along the fence between Transect Cl and Transect C2. There were young red alder(Alnus rubra) volunteering into this area. Some Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menzeisii) seedlings were planted as part of the mitigation effort. 7 -- Another view along the fence at the edge of the mitigation area. Some red alder and salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) have volunteered into this area. 8 C2-A View looking south along Transect C2. Note the less vegetated area in the center of the photo. This is the sewer line easement belonging to Federal Way Watrer and Sewer District. The district directed Polygon Northwest to not plant the sewer line easement. 9 C2-73 This photo shows the southern end of Transect C2. 10 C2-5 1 This is a view of Transect C2 looking south from the approximate mid-point of the transect. Note the sewer line easement is essentially devoid of shrubs or trees except for a few volunteer plants. This is in accordance with directions from the Federal Way Water and Sewer District. 11 C2-5 1 This photo shows the vigor of the western red cedar (Thuja plicata) planted as part of the mitigation process. 12 C2-B This photo shows the north end of Transect C2. Note the willow (Salix sp.) growing in the planted area. (1) C2-B This is a photo of the area north of Transect C2. Note the salmonberry growing in the foreground and the red alder volunteers in the background along the side of the sewer easement. 14 -- This is a view of the sewer line easement and mitigation area looking south from the north end of Tract C. 15 -- This is a view looking westerly from the north end of the sewer line easement. This area+is vegetated with volunteer red alder and grasses. This is the maintenance access road for the sewer line. Campus Glen- 1998 Mitigation Monitoring Photo Documentation Log—Page 1 TRANSECT PHOTO or PHOTO NO. POINT PHOTO DESCRIPTION 16 E-A View of Transect E looking west from eastern end of transect. Note the lack of vegetation due to extensive use by neighborhood children. Note the sparse number of Douglas fir trees. Many more trees were planted in this are by the landscape contractor. 17 E-B View looking east from the west (B) end of the transect. 18 E-1 View looking east from east end of Transect E. Note volunteer alder on left side of photo. 19 -- View looking west into Tract E. Note that more than /of the Douglas fir planted in 20 -- View of areas where erosionthisarea controlare grasses have been trampled by extensive human use. 21 -- This is a close-up view of one of the areas seen in Photo 20. 22 -- View of western end of Tract E. Note the excellent grass cover in the mitigation area. This photo shows one of many volunteer red alder. 24 -- This photo shows soft rush (Juncus effusus) growing in some of the compacted areas within the tract. 25 -- This is a photo of one of the recently planted Douglas fir seedlings. These seedlings will struggle initially because of the competing grasses and legumes. They will, however, do quite well once they are larger and are not as negatively impacted by the grasses. 26 -- This is a view from the inside edge of the planted mitigation area. Note the wild rose (Rosa sp.) on the mitigation area is doing very well. 27 -- View looking west along north edge of disturbed buffer area. There was not as much volunteer red alder at the west end as at the east end. Campus Glen- 1998 Mitigation Monitoring Photo Documentation Log—Page 2 TRANSECT PHOTO or.PHOTO NO. PRINT PHOTO DESCRIPTION 28 G-1 View of west end of Tract G. This photo, along with Photo 29 and Photo 30, show a panoramic view of the west end for Tract G. Note the area where the person is standing. The vegetation is sparse in this area because of human use and maintenance access. 29 G-1 Photo shows area immediately north of Photo 28. Note constructed ditch in center of photo. 30 G-1 Photo shows area immediately north of Photo 29. 31 G-1 View of Tract G looking from west to east along north side of mitigation area. Wild rose plants were planted (1997) as "whips" in this area because of the southerly exposure. Growth appeared to be okay. 32. G-1 View of south side of Tract G mitigation area. Red-osier dogwood (Corpus stolonifera) and willow planted in 1997. Plants appeared to being doing quite well. 33 -- This photo shows some of the remaining red-osier dogwood, along the north side of Tract G, which were planted in 1996. The plants were doing okay. 34 -- Photo shows willows, red-osier dogwood, and a patch of sedge (Carex sp.) growing in one of the wetter areas within the tract. 35 -- This photo is a closer view of the sedge shown in Photo 34. 3 -- This is a photo showing the south side of the Tract G mitigation area in the eastern end to the approximate middle of the site. Note the vigor of the will and-fed-osier dogwood in this location. 37 G-2 View looking west from the east end of Tract G. Note the large woody debris in the pond area. Woody debris provides shade and, eventually, nutrients for the plant community. More wood could be added over time. 38 G-2 View of plants installed in 1997 along southern edge of Tract G. 39 G-2 View of plants installed in 1997 along northern edge of Tract G. 40. -- Closer view of area in Photo 39. Plant growth is very good. 41 -- Photo of red-flowering currant(Ribes sp.) planted in 1997 on north side of Tract G.. 42 -- Wetland G in its present condition (west end). 43 -- Wetland G in its present condition (middle). 44 -- Wetland G in its present condition (middle). 45 -- Wetland G in its present condition (east end). Campus Glen- 1998 Mitigation Monitoring Photo Documentation Log—Page 3 't _=s _ i : 11 l-- T�i., �{(�.+ ^ Y �'. Y M* \ 6 :Ifi.:-.„. ' . • ,,iiiitt#1,.1' t t; __1,, .r..,..- .4-, ,,,_ ,c..,!, ... . '=, `.' ., • ' .,,,, - -..-"tat'-u,..',...'-'5"11,*7,7t';--7-tr.41k,.‘,771., • _ '• r "4 € t .` �� ;- 'Yi r 4y (' x 444 `�" `i . s. .7� _ x �•, .t ' ► t . L. rr t + r+ ._ n a gy" yv � �3. •i 1 + . .y`�� sI ' r- '41-e,}A .t -mac _ P i�' � - �r 4 a •� . +;� `,� ,-. :--,-!k-i—iri' ;tee r "+r'.. # r 3P "� x c �1 J r._x x y °` ,i' r 3 1;-. te y • t ��_ T;J 4 4 f, _1 iiii .. , _ 449 Wiz `a • _ rs g ,4*c-gz,'''-'...i..'..'6-'1.S.-jt:*;1..3-•-i+.1.qi..•yi.l,4---1—t•'0 4i',t.4,,-1',,t,',,'re/4,,tr",.,,4t,.,.t,7.,1.`1,,4, em s. : �k Yrt` .. �, l•,,-, )' 'i gym: }\ '. MM _\ '- • .I,,'l k,. • pry t d _ 77 / - 1 ,_ -._ 2 -v � �.. .. -44 , � der` _ ti ../ >r 4 ¢ - Ii - - _ € Ni-e d _ , - ` ice ` dit NI' >ay , s.d ✓ _ 4. r- iK 3 �J , . U----i, :-, *1' -Ii- .. '. t k- ' 7 }, 46,* i ' .._ h 1 ' r t••,- Y� ty� - - ,,Ak _ `Y�' 4 d �1 �Y — - -,- b j 1 Y• -L.i d ;'A i4141. •• "1Ff' 1 1< tr e�� _ _9�� Y S t1i. .•* t # y .. .} ;.Jr 3t: g xs \.'ems wt,, � -_ '-1 S' f i ��,,�+� a - t s .. :�� a6' !�d ems,- 1 3- v, � �i n;..., , �+ t j� , r i - 1¢1R'.,,. f 6..✓t, r,--- 4,4 3_.ry,0, e{ „' 7, �a _ l -a T-- 1-r=ir_ 1 a tr , -yr � t .• 4W,, } " • ),j T - 1 . 7} 'IS . 'r'Sj d { !'+bt t s d-/ , .. � 1� -i ,- j ��_ 6 �, — , -2 _ �--4, r',Sr_ r- -I', u ! �1 t - J �i. *'fii - -- 'n t '�r�, �# �i�`= '-. a,. 1 Ii ; �L" a sl r° \a'I'+ 1.-. i. ,4f 1 • • A_ lix '� «g �. t o i .�°�. e",. ' 1 ! i�" �. T ro. r� "Zr`rIJ `¢ rT�,t. r ` F fi y a , a •.-/ ♦P t' ti- _ e r vita n ` 'r" S ?n •4 ' ftit^ t a .. z-` !�_� r f�' • ,. .... -.,-4'. . . , .. ....* • y Ks y _ tH... _..._ .O • -•- b . r Ar ♦ t: #• +.. ..f. „r • a C: ,�. gY S -.c41` nt,..t, ,tom. a'1 ' .� t L.r ^a y— 4ks w S•s'6�� 7 .., +. Ay 17 11 A•f 7 - `; b ' . `�. +i i _�.� , fy� • <� .: fit' -, . . _ ,i.,- , ,e Ak.V.' . • _•4''''.7. •::;..44r 4y, .4 ,. ti °�fi s� s�'. C..„ -„,- ��yy _ 't ,_ . „_ _ ,„ om •5•F __‘-'', .: ''.:' :'._ I �d 1' to -s s;+:a- _ •r I ._ r ca : Yn Py f },•� S Ilt s• A E iI ,� s I «. t b Le. .!-mac p , T}It tA. tr siskI -y Y • n ;.. ; �pyt, } NL. 3a �{S' r i N 1 1 r X f .—r 'pro--t s r _ `_ y , 1 t 7ie M H mm 1 1 Via' y'- I. T, .a n } x Aa '"lt„, „`(. t1Y .„, t ._yt`f ..J Tt w y' ; �._ ^ ;r1 is 4s+F t rx: a� 3 Hil �'., L >• `#" a- i.} 4 „'t�,;' vz ,s it ice- -r n - ...t ' ,-- xt il._._- • 5 _k Y�Y.. - :�- ' - t ft t 1, 1 f' ` 3 4.-.ty t t t - s. • SS {{ F ' t }i �`4Y• 43` • � Y':�y4 'C'L A i^ A G. . n• # �i1, •tS , t %,-i- _ t t 1\ , ,+} •,— i -, f .�,t 11v�-- �{� 4 s-�,7��f.+ t 1i'^S'.`t*i} p'r ?t y .'M y \: i. •a 1.,'• „ t:-.• L: _ t;q. ^� `..ems �_ 1t1�1(� � , �-+r "� P. � p � � ; i"Y .Y \ a ~_• H � • ,'t�i 'y - :' .,r �Atil,i.. -4. ♦5\'3s.1'-, -- w . I,a fF 1' § y Y, k �•f '3 t.,. „� i F � 1 it i 1a S; Y �` r e 4 �. �7 { t 5 . t , tx . .-. af `S f '£ �f +1•p r ••�. .f ,1,' t ""' , '4 " I.y.� 6 . 1 • Y p ..a - 1 _ •A t.. 3 �•Y r r, "y� - a 4 ; t.•-.' ' y4P` ' •-..y v ./..,. �� ':,-*{!&" I!��'-gmµ• ,se t • 1'il. 1. 1 h .t ' h F t .rr iM i _ e." - r ••Y�s$�7 r, r i k ►s ' ---� ; tom f - � x ,K' /]�! a ' 1 i tom '• i' ):.: ( �- M 4 r 1 '4� t4} gR ``ii 0 �' "'Tf�t ,� _, ;,� t .F.r ,4 t I ,-- - = fi . `.' i {• 40 i it • r _ kY y a ... =,:t.t..„..pli.s,z. ,.:4,4,„„..-7:- ',Li,-ZAte.-_-:-112,-;- ,„„,----,`,C;",,,-. _ , ',','," 7.,,'`.r.--P'''''-''.. • ''' .;• :'Ntlfif-•-'7..1. 4.W.**..- - ' -21't•-• itt, ‘," ' t 1 4- t '',4_,'*"-*•;.".';;;, .-' . .;:',. •....‘_:1'---;••:/tr' `- '44.ri. '.*- • 'V .,:. _i"‘-i-i$7.".: .•Ir-4wIt1,22-,*.*.** *'''.• •.— - _ .- '-'..:1-. ' ; . - = ..,--- ' '-'4,14'.4t4:-.L.-..f-'-",:-.c 4-;_-, .‘ 4- "..it4,".4.-1,-S ,,---ri •:-.%,.-itslIN.r..2.*' :•-,A.-:'-'_-_,--;,er:;:c .-X.:44;1_,..,-:-w-,_ , . _ - , . _ ',-.,--,,,::* _,Ir* tie . o j .f g 3 A,--„,,•;,,-,-,..4t;,tyk.1„.,-y.' ''''..:;-.a:',;+:-'--'''''t;og-„,-;t'i.:r -',,14,- ' . , .,-„„t...____ts. ;.... ,- ,,..,. :. 4,:„.04.,.,,,.., ,..L.,..r:.,,,i,,._ , , 1 trs „.. • 'Z. a!` „A.,,,;;;,,,i - - -em s_ • o - j _S � 'f...� *•.; 1 J1wl •11Kfttii, ',1-s, A • 'Y• .. _ ., 11 �'t�l. y� .{' - . A. _..„. ,...,,,, .,......c /.. i• i[' y i '. fir ' r.j� {, ry'rr ^'t p •1-- '**41E4f/ti, 0 4: "Iet-ig‘44' 44‘.' eallit'!";le; : 4 sAirr f ii . e . u '< 14 - ,fi "�', , ,„c. re ' l ' ,s + l 4F4v • i � .G k. ,.., rY4 „ .., ♦i v •4 ` Y � . ,.tp !} a . 6 \•• /t- (/� j � , . ., i r•.F .1.�-,J S . 1177 �'4'•, / o•k.r ^'^ `lev'' ''t 4` s ♦,�4•r.. Ittisiiir 1 I .ea ray rj n. .i• t -.li• tt''1 ♦ •t '-d4T fie' ,t; `,yg �:.� • ,44r ,f , ,.... ...,/...„, .r• ,... , ,,,, ,..C. A, ''''.A.',,, .7.-,, .... ' i-,.. \ '4, -., > f t f i'":'" '• w f- - _ \,,,a 111, itt r e t, 7Ta �•- j r Ki F jail j' 71t1 1 'f -- a ,ij ✓ t ;a , ..(6 - e, f - yit w t r3 - iwit' tif ' . -`", ,-t , e 1r„, iN F' ; 4 1, -§- tt,1 ry-.,- r •r -� -t♦ . yµ tom.' .. ,d _'fir } r •1,1-"V-r•I''‘''''';Ak-4•—,.'•-'i''':7A‘4:4:: 1: IA • 1. '. p A'. /t+ _`., , t s ..,„3 Y - ._ a s i f,, a `• _ } - $�.� r• � �, i 1 ��. . � �1, �„ � - • 2 • t '�, � •y !,a� !i r.s a s 1[' Y� , . ' ,i: - -` ' s. 7' :.2tee`i'4 _': e `s ;LL. +r h y " bid }, r.:. �{1yT r, A ;`. shy _•., }., !a Lx ^�.fu +�' a uh 1. :,,„.. .,.,.,.., - ';:;.4...:-.. , 1 4 € .• e�,4 3 { $ Y �y 4 t y .gam t ./4 A,.,7 `7' 'fC et. ._ q __0„.. _.---;,....,..4- . �- _ .7'-J i` - �"-te r � � 2 v - �1 �t �� ,...„. ,.-. 4, - __„,tcA s, ,,i__, .,,t,„..,,...r., , , ,,,... .4 , ,_ ,L ..„, __,.... , . - .e.4._ _ -Y.'4z---. '' 4C' ', ' -2,.. --—jr" -' - -'* - '- ,,' i. ..,1,-. ..,.„..-.t.- _ . x!'r�' ..a ! r' '''r ht . yy[[ „.:: ` e+°r4• s 1 tti' .�i -�r` 4.,, IPP:�s! f � y a 3 sis` ,. - 1 � ' was _r' -,Y • 0.•** '''' ' 4, -4''s -***' _ ,..• 11411 A '''' . ' "4,- li; ".' - • * ' '.' '` , t eep�' "F y � le �t -, f. ♦ t..=` i i, ' ,�„',(t 77._ , 4ry :di. T ;----:::::-'- :.' € Sot { . i ... • .--1-__,_ -..,-----.....,..„.„-_2.--_,;„;,; , :,_„K „__„,-- --- - ,-_4'23F7t77. ,.(. -,,,,':.,_._..-V` _... --*.-. '. 11"4:-46,,,,,4,..-„o:-. v :-," F tr ' Ji✓. ♦ _ C. ram.... .'� -- 1 — = 1 :. ;1._".,_ ,-; - ,._ _ . €d tsr r f „*.:._,, , -,_,_ 7, ,,,,._10077- - \ - It_-_ _,=-_:.. _ -_ __-_„. .,,, ,:,- - _ . - . Ili_ = ;, r, "... .pro • _ r- - _,_ ..._, .. ...... ,, :.: V JWAR rss s ijial_ • • •. •:_ `" et } , • { "+ ; - t £ . ¢ ,- ` . ,: 3 ..'man`^ ti S ,_ + r • i t pl r tom -' .. f1 / € H may.` _'vf T y ,{.� y ]rt l •r i is K. Fg‘ L ' 'ems'.'{ — £ } f it Y .. 'tk 1 "Al a i! s _ w� S �� is i_-- 1. • =1 ,_I rig ' 0, • ,,— } f r . , . ,,,. ,,, ,- 1 — __ 116- ,4,./-, 4r7.-_,_ - `'.--•,, --,. _._ '—F �t Nj - x+t' ? 1. r t. ::?.. ,€ '3 • ' w j oaf j ..V.' a. ^'f r 't r r K a f ,r � 1 S�'�, .� .< r .-iy s,.. Y ,r s.y 3 �f At 7 - - l s� + .+ �€ d i s� -� ,r• �. S p 'i!F'!`i s �{ T 1 -1 rxz., t.+„� i t .gyp +2 a i � .. fxt � � '� 1 , "ti +k",*.-jis.. maPsl,.. " .y -t;; r - 1 ' rlypy T ;a { 1r 4r,:. J f r€`�r•y `' M u t 4t if 'k • � - '` '� tts � 1. ` {. -- 1 � € - ff c s t t S 13-,tk t r T T• i. _ ✓ l L y 7 • t r ` ,*ce a)"1 _Y/ } i =� f {€ fi� 4, eda.",tty • i. L. t Ni _ L p• y, 7 4 `�hii krt �I .+ t `, as ? ,44s ',- Ai' .3td _ t v 4( h •. 'N't �� R..` rP'�'4s1 � 1 ellf ♦_ i ji ` Wi• zf T�� t6 --1.41t ' ,li , 7# t t3f ' _' - g _ Imo'_ _ .—,.. `v1 - ' a 1 s - 6i '.r 4 mot s_ ; H P -t 3— 1 :V"--1....varox,‘"' 1 • - �i! - .} -, SN s 3� � _� r ' 1 _ s , t nil , _ _ . kirmm., -,,,, _ 4,-- -7-- _ . k-"-,=---,-"- '`'-- - �ti.Is SSA f / r .* , .. _ _ .. .. .. ._.. ._ ...,„_,...___...i..__..... .4_=.-__.....„,16, \ _ „.__ ,_ _...... 8.1,.. 4". .... •-.•--- _----;:••7-42•13tii:-Z»,===,-,_ ..-- _•,4„,:,. +4 -.:',.....'_ L `� {, - , . t :.-7:++ c- ill'- 4- — IW `.; - =-- Ns'"-zW,-- /''',....' - --:--1,17!:::"-_,---'-_, - ' .,4k ,,,:-..;ii. _ -•=4,111,-,-1.'-'`i, ictiE .. - ., - ,.....0; -,-_ .„7 ram' •rJ� F Y-.-. -F .,a4.2 '• .'k.''- - ' • _ -_ _ x - a .4 ri r a $' } -F �"^, - fir. - • - h k ,, ,c • -s„ _ R - _ - ! '� _ 'C fir`" r � y: .. -.--plik%".'!'''ti- „ -,,t,_-_:_:;--- .\ i • ':-..''. f'-' -\ ''‘'',14:-4-:.----.'.='''-'-f..- :'`Act,x__$----'-',:,-, ---,A., ----r;7- ' -:_ --,i-t..7 ,_,,:-..4-',•=32_2172-,t227i:2:, ' •-.:,-2,_. ."! „:;p2 ', ,st, .-,.;Lii,r,; ___77,*_' ,.;-„- -;-=:7-7. - • 4017 ; --:-'-r_•-''_. _k,--,'"-y., 1.-.,,y.,--.,,,,„:..14,TI.kt-7J..;;''. __,,,k'' .,,,f1,,,,.,,-;_i:- _ . ,-; F 'k -• -Z---''' ' ----'. -'. '--'' . .,- 'M - '' •' iot - _ _-,-- -' - -,'OfAv ---111-'--Vill . - * --- •' -- • --:-- . - - -- —,----i-'--,— 049714---- 7'--d ' ` : - € 1, '2- -: + '-' '''' -- ' #-VE---------,`-7--"------7-,-----4--"-::- -- •--w_.--.7,- -;%.V'- ----77 - _..n`,_•-`'.‘ ,,-____ .=_r•---_-_,_*?-,.'-.:4.,-..,--,F.g.-.,-_,,-.-;. it',2,,,i._ iv 2 2, .......-2.2„. .-.‘,... 2 , ,,...,.2,2224,,,,i..4, it r 7 d "ed+ °Y ,jit 1 -11,---- :1,7-: .--_, , 4._ ' •41441,..-,.. 4.. Y ems_ $ . ,ii . ,tit .},; f - - '': ; .-z i- ' �.,f vP .• 4) ' : {{ i �- -I I i • T. rt y �r • :',a- - _ y - 4-- + jry y } �si r lit = t ;� _ _ r.. . 4 {{ ti y AA 'f,it4.--.'-::-.', . `-..- :.-qc;. ..',.i'' \ ).:.1114:. ' a .-.-WkA:4=';,tk,.--'.'r,-- .,,,,,‹ti„.. .... .. .-,,,,. • .,...;-_-„. ‘_A-- -:,,,,..7-i-_-. ,, .4. ,-:- -4,,,, , •. .'",-,,_7': ,•.. ., ,---- = --— ' --7-4•Vik'''''?"-.-4.;-14-`, j 4 }5 .+yt _ ��jj Yi .t- i, z ♦ t I s5 i V 4 t K `=:ice - �`i # 7f l�u "e �i''' # :, .\ -,=.- '$ Y - i #t E x+. '4 ♦•' « � • ^ d kt , �`. j �y , , '--,----- -:--i--.%°- : - --',"'4"---; _Y-„t: -----ne: _.4... . .1.).,it—t _., ---..s.-4„.. ii,.-- .--- _ '74, '',1_,-: . r'''r r.--7:. ..-,A•.:; . - ',.,‘.i y c[ 4 ;'5. r_ ate• s • ,,,-;---IVA4 V- "it-AV-I.'''...,` t.:--_-_„_-,_-t,.- : p t 1 1 • it : -..,* , ,,- -• . •• . ' .-•-• i.1, ..,-,-,.-::'-C:-.'-':-et' -.-' n € r -�' iZ ,. f �' , •taY4q,.z, ,r e, ,- . t IT' I . A - u - if --.. c.t ± e. 7S7,' ♦". , .K..r••5 t €'Si '`t# _ fit+ -^ 5 t r, /i { `'-. � f*, t lv `_ 8 s• �i wit ;:- , �_•_. ir,Z `3. i f. •Via s. , r. , f tr _r te wa_� --- : r . -A., _.- \ 'it '` $i r a t r' j t • < - t 3 - t ' k. #� ass;'. _ t r f• t - t �+lwq rs'+' 'r t 'F.i_ t - _`2 �.tc br-1' ','� •ti.-- r• „' ', Ot a, ., i , - . 4_...r . ( , 'i a , , , —;::',:'*.i.:::,iii. ,t ,,..1,%,i,1, i , ) 't,7' -', 44, : ve: ,,,__, :„...6?„,.. .,...,4:,,fs__24-_., ...i_,.._,,__;_.t,..14tiv7*.tlif,ri,.,, --_1=',„-:_14' ; tx ' 144 I' _iot , . 0 . ,.— _ '-',.-N , '''',,,, - --!,7.-',6.7 _,„, 0.. 7_ =-'-':-- -A-, .., . • _ .., . 1 „,. . _ , , , ,,,_• , , , „ .._ ..,-,. -. ,,,,,,. ,.. .--, ..., ., , ,,,- . ,.....,i:, , .-, - _, , , ,. ...„, r ,,_.- s ___ ,, •, .. bpp ITr r s - Al, . ` � is 4• } �. s �' - y r mot€ -. s ' _ (r a yS� --w. i tY €s r ? '= /i • # ` • �9N i.i1 � d N►• �� ++t- vfTy _ 4r ;..„ • •,, E Y , � ' 'fit ^$ d4 ; j ,, A.•' ., ,. 3.r . T - ,, o. - !- dX -,y1` _.., • _', '-'- � ,.. tlR S pia 9€ - - •- ft.,-.4.7 j�$�S A. _ i rj a1 _ ':-0../: ,. = .. ......044004 4 -_,. jr.*1 , - , . -, t — `` X rE ` SE Y F 14 ; `` �, i'i �� i t� - _ bra Ad �'yy ,fit ' ,,• (,I " IP g tt • c , ,` }� ,,% 4, ate. 1 d ;i rd t r ,}Y '+J'�' ' ' rid" r fir: 1 w141,1 sb — •• - _ .. Y ?$. M. , �a.Yy.i� ter, — ` : ` ,,- _ `a't _ s"}' a tom.`�� -=4. =" . �r - 'Y � n y- _ r.i � ,�.yf` r ' f'. •`2*#,LAY !s f • f.4- �- if 0 k •--'-' ,.._.....4'. '•;*:-;t4sii:41-41,,,' ?s_—4-.,:,..., ;:4-4.'1'..:_ *.*-' ' 714----7:- '''-• ''. ' ,,iitrt,tt 41414,,v.,i- , - "N \ ' -----:' '' ,,,„:„..:,-4.._„.,:_- .,,-,•...? .-1,,,,,_,,,,--,,..--. ,,-4:-,-t--'z--.„..---- - - ;- t;„,,,-- . „!-f- ...s., ,.'-q-.--,.- , .‘ Ibt-•,.-4 . "P'it r'gt-1.?,., ,., : -' ' po,..i.,...7.-":_'_:^12-_,:=', ,,r.;...1.',•4-•,_.'l,,..„:„. -0....... '..k.,,'.....,-..N_!•::-.-,, -...A.-..:41,4 ,..... 7-- ,A,..r.....„-,-r'--__4 lry iwr.::,- . Os::.,..1 /J. ..4 i , ,iii.,-=•,:i: ., -_- 47 f � 4 - f 4 I ,3 v' 1,'., . YL_ * 4: r t, �f, - *4' 41 T�' i._J =..¢f� y,y, -__ i` tits. - - � �.-`'� r�� t; � ; �� V¢rl L�-t '.� 6. r �;I -._..01.4 .-. z .,, - l -. _ h - - -, . _74--.JII*4-,-E S of • ,. .r S V• 4-•= is ma y;. � 4 ♦{` t a r .� a Yi, A.. •o I d it,', S { rvS k s viz ., •• :.,-,c..,a 1_„ 4r • f� v ' . : .. - ,. Wit' _ '.s �. ' = __ . - ,__._z R.'!. ,T :tTy, •i h 1 k-f;f J ' +ems 1 r • f I !1 1t . -` , . i, • ., ` � 'I '>f ,ti f,---''''Al ; . t4 •4 y • Y1T �`i .fit• 4t h - =A - r- , I "{ +'{i • ' Z t S'g 3 l ' C• 1. '.. •-";-;..S. •,- -.17, -. —_--- , , ,_ i_ . ..,..., __,, * .. .. _ Itp - 1. . ,_�. 4. a .- awl Y ;� fr ,� f �F T { , �Y S .* `d it l - 6 ,, - .r _ m y y j, rid.::- _ 77 tC "v--L - JIt / I * .r ate' f E 1s X• . .,• a '' is �« y, ' - `�- � f `-a• a _ as r' �' �• A.ir • k 11 41, Tt .� h T 't. .1 dr A ". gJ 7 : s fiti*1_ r r ' 'R s.'. t • y i i JJ�"i 4 A a��' lik J ^ - t Al t i #5a�: ''i k l t 7 A, dr i t..Aap."- am, t 4t`r ! h .3' —5 1- - liRewa ( 'IJI V f' i 4, • nw• y - ; E fir;' b iir ti ile s`_ tit 4 -•T' 4€ i! {� - , s 'j ter:- -_ ,- E '! .,, ...N. _ -_. „.. , , ,„4_ _ ,„..;▪ -- kta-I.:4_, 7 t ram. ft ', ' �'�� 4 a�- £ a� ; _"��,' _.,__ �- �� mot: � �� r � - ��- � _ __ .�- +4 ;3 n '.r_ tilv � l -�' A 2 -. �# -�I L_ !Y #- 4f. ff,,,t0 _ t I II >. y �`f IV f .. , r; rr y yi rty , „:- ..i-',...- _ r t'fir 40 , it'_ fff� { • t. P✓ . 4 rettifleg + - -,� y7 .ye •.- s•Rb`` - r._j •.:••�7{ !r ,,. ri f 1}°+ ' 4. �, , ¢ram' > } �;� :i0g+J:" t �ia t1 `� -. - } .'ma's# - ' a `4 ' ar _e � � = `--a ..'' I �, 'e � '. qyc - ,qP•, r iY 2'$ �� 411. a• . 4ti .- �,_ 4 •- t,, , Y '.E A Wit'..,= .or •- , . �.e foisi -''' •* * - * rt,,,,..-... ,.--.2- . /,_ ,i -, - ..ta::„_,. ,- _.:. __. . , ..2_,,- , , ii_ _ , ,,, _ , .:, , '4, ,-. . - - '-'--_,-- ** y.. -- _ .ram*�s „ ~'-. i * A Ate,' 7 j V i 'ram. N• /l 1 s. .-...�..�-1,1,..7___;:;__ .._Y M`M � -.,��' b3. § 9 •T' t 's _ f i t '} ' - '*/..*11.ji,'Ite.''' 2 %'''‘-`''*".;V' *4 AfkAtt. '-' \4't'til‘ -U-i* ,---.‘NtN-,F ' -, •'" 1 i, „',_*Ps t;117. .P, ,i`t*:,... _.,_ ......,.„..,-....„ -, ,.,..__— _, „„e., .- . . ... ._.„,.__ _ __.,.._.„ ., , _,..„.. -4 t „ l' , „,... .,,__.-e,r ' i_ ...... ,, 4- --:,IL.,72--,. :`,,, ....51,0 ,r,„ ,... 4. '- I ''. -.. - • Y "d. �" • s e , 1 4= i„...,•t (1, 1, f � 4mo vos 1. s ,tee :r i 1 L ak t_ 'r 4 ut.« . tsN Ae t ;.p."'* '' y 6 r - .. " n ..._ t1 R`: 'r • .r i* y f yi'j`?'a a � Allrtiv � r � 71a•R.t *d*e---.-._0-4-. F'« 1 \. AF'$ •.T. lit r - efy ,.: . r <• 9 .a-: r _y 1 . _L._" _ ''r$ i r'Y - - _ ..a• 1k p fi drili _ -. y- *. ss`. } tip' ,4 1. _.. 1 S x . 1 {. i ` 1. Army t ` ` I 'j, Opp- * ... e • _ t`+.' -.°•....�; Y id 7a: 1.. f1�. A y 'trn ~��`at�:: �` I. � ! §`- e S•` / �i� z s wiz s Y^ s` `�I-MJ-R!rt`yam. �f-�C/) ��.; T/•; �4.a. �*�[�` 'rd! ° } ¢' 1 POLYGON n NORTHWEST COMPANY November 24, 1998 Minnie Dhaliwal City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Campus Glen Wetland Monitoring Dear Minnie: We received your fax last week outlining the recommendations from Adolfson and Associates from our site visit. In reviewing the recommendations I had a few concerns. Prior to expending the resources required to plant over 150 new trees and shrubs, amend soils, build a fence and install signage I would like to have some assurance from the City that this work, if successful, will complete our responsibilities at this project. We have spent several thousands of dollars over the last year and a half since I have been working on this project on both plantings and consultants. As an example our meeting in the field to review this project cost nearly $1,000.00. We would prefer at this point to spend our money where it will be most effective; on plant material. I am proposing that we complete the work this winter and monitor the new planting s and existing conditions again next fall at the end of the growing season. If all new plantings are installed and growing and there has been no deterioration of existing conditions we would like to have a final signoff from the City. We would like to move forward with this work but are hesitant to do so without assurances from the City. Please let me know if this agreement is acceptable. Thank you for your ongoing assistance on this project. Sincerely, Malcolm McNaughton C(19 tMTv t.CE v B Development Coordinator �ECOPMENT�EPATMEv r NO u 2 4 1998 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201,Kirkland,Washington 98033 (425)822-7700 Fax(425)827-4098 10/09/98 FRI 16:36 FAX 2536614129 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY fQ003 REC D BY COMMUNITY DE/ELuPMENT DEPARTMENT OCT 1 6 1998 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WETLANDS CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Consultant: Adolfson & Associates 5309Shilshole Avenue NW Seattle, WA 98107 Project: Campus Glen Subdivision Wetland Monitoring. King County Fite No. S89P0114; Federal Way File No. JLA9Q-PP08 Applicant: Polygon Northwest Company Date: October 7,1998 Project Planner: Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner (253)661-4082 Documents : None Task Scope: Meeting with the applicant in the field to discuss plantings for next year. Next year is the final year for monitoring Campus Glen subdivision wetlands. Task Schedule: Meeting to be scheduled as early as possible after receipt of signed authorization to proceed. Task Cost: Not to exceed $340 (as per your cost estimate) without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. Deliverables: No written report is needed. If you need any other information, please let me know, My phone number is 253-661-4082. Acceptance: City of Federal Way (Planner) ` Date I O//`%j`"TY Consultant Date • J Date £0! tee �� Ce \..v, - y 1 POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT October 7, 1998 OCT 9 1998 Minnie Dhaliwal .w .,la.:r... •r y « ' City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003-6210 RE: Campus Glen Wetland Monitoring Dear Minnie: I am writing to you to follow up our conversation this morning. I believe that in general we are doing well at the Campus Glen Wetland mitigation and monitoring. As I mentioned this morning I would like to generate a consensus among the City, Adolphson and ourselves as to what will be needed/required for the approval of the final monitoring report next year. In order to accomplish this I believe it would be beneficial to meet on- site to take a first hand look at the situation. I believe there are a couple of area that need to be addressed directly; the area at the entrance to the utility corridor at Transect C. The other area is where the douglas fir continue to disappear. The following is an itemized response to Adolphson review of our monitoring report: 1. The wetland monitoring requirements state that the plant survival must meet the mitigation intent. We believe that it is possible to meet the intent of the mitigation without providing percent cover for each species. We have provided the percent cover for each layer rather than species as noted in the report. In reviewing the site we have noted which species have survived and which are missing or dead. This information combined with the site cover information provided we are able to determine the species composition and whether this is meeting the mitigation intent. 2. Transect C-1 was located within the planting area in the same location as last year. The area in question is part of a utility easement that may not be planted with trees and must remain accessible. 3. The stem count data and percent survival data will provided in the final monitoring report. 4. The stem count and percent cover will be related to the standards of success and compared to the mitigation intent. 5. Himalayan blackberry will be removed and monitored throughout the next year to prevent a reoccurrence. 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201,Kirkland,Washington 98033 (425)822-7700 Fax(425)827-4098 6. Since red alder is not an acceptable substitute to Douglas Fir in Tract E, we will not be replacing these plants. We would like to plant another species that meets the mitigation intent but is not as popular with the residents. We would be willing to plant an alternative species or in an alternative location to meet the mitigation goals. However, we cannot afford to keep planting trees that go missing every year. We are open to any suggestions or solutions the City or its consultants may offer. 7. The final monitoring report will be by September 30, 1999 as required by the mitigation plan. It is my understanding that you are putting together a scope of work for Adolphson that would include a site visit and a couple of hours of coordination time. I will be pre-pay the amount required so that we may set up a meeting as soon as possible. Thank you for your help in this matter. Should you have any questions or concerns please feel free to call me at 425-822-7700. Sincerely, ALL, Malcolm McNaughton Development Coordinator COMM INITY ''�' l i JEPARTMEN?. 4 August 1998 Minnie Dhaliwal ADOLESON City of Federal Way ASSOCIATES,INC. 33530 First Way South Federal Way,Washington 98003 Re: Campus Glen Monitoring Review Dear Ms. Dhaliwal, At the request of the City of Federal Way, Adolfson Associates Inc. (AAI) has reviewed the Summer 1998 monitoring conducted by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. (WDI) for Polygon Northwest Company(PNC) at the Campus Glen residential development in Federal Way, Washington. This year is the fourth year of a five year monitoring period. AAI has reviewed the monitoring report and conducted a field visit on 10 July 1998 to independently assess site conditions. This letter contains comments on the monitoring methods and the overall site conditions at Campus Glen. Mitigation at the Campus Glen site included wetland buffer enhancement in three areas: Tract C, Tract E, and Tract G. Monitoring Methods The standards of success outlined in the Wetland Mitigation Plan (Terra Associates, March 1994) are 75 percent vegetative cover and 80 percent survival of the installed plant materials in five years. Although the report states that a stem count was conducted in 1997, the results are not contained within the report. Also, percent cover data needs to be collected for each individual species rather than for each vegetative strata. This will provide information on whether the species composition meets the intent of the mitigation goals. Until this data is reported, one cannot determine whether the site has met the standards for success. Site Conditions It appears that Transect C-1 was established within the vegetation that was present prior to mitigation. The area that was originally planted is now explained to be "a grassy area for parking maintenance vehicles". In Tract C-2, it appears that some of the Himalayan blackberry has been misidentified as trailing blackberry. Himalayan blackberry is invading this area. The plantings in Tract C and E are sparse. The soils in Tract E and above the sewer line in Tract C are dry and compacted. Tract E appears to have been mowed since the WDI site visit. Mowing may have resulted in some plant mortality. Environmental Analysis 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW Seattle, WA 98107 adolfson@adolfson.com (206)789-9658 FAX(206)789-9684 Cf. Dhaliwal/Campus Glen Page 2 4 August 1998 Compliance with the Approved Mitigation Plan I concur with the following recommendations made by WDI for Tract E: additional plantings, soil amendments,and a sign. In addition, the following items will be necessary to meet the requirements of the approved mitigation plan: • During future monitoring visits, percent cover data should be collected for each individual species to determine the species composition. • Transect C-1 should be located amongst the mitigation plantings. • A stem count should be conducted during the next site visit and the percent survival data should be provided in the final monitoring report. • The stem count data and percent cover data must be related to the standards of success outlined in the monitoring plan in order to evaluate site success. • Himalayan blackberry needs to be removed from Tract C. Blackberry removal should be done by hand and the cut stems should be treated(without spraying) with Round up. Cut stems should be removed from the site. • Red alder is not an acceptable substitution for Douglas fir in Tract E. • The final monitoring report is due to the City in the fall of 1999. We are pleased to have the opportunity to prepare this document for you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Andy Castelle or me at (206) 789-9658. Thank you. Sincerely, ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES INC. Jennifer Goodridge Project Biologist POLYGON ►g NORTHWEST COMP1 July 20, 1998 Minnie Dhaliwal City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003-6210 RE: Campus Glen Wetland Dear Ms. Dhaliwal: We are writing to you regarding the planting and replanting of douglas fir in Tract E. We believe that the residents in the area may be taking these plants for their own purposes. We have now planted this area twice. It seems that it would be more appropriate to change the plants to a species less popular with the residents (red alder) or have a City official verify the plantings. We cannot continue to bear the financial burden of replanting this area when plants seem to keep disappearing. We have sold out of this project and have no control over the residents. We would like your permission to substitute plants or have a City inspection. Should you have any questions or suggestions in this matter please feel free to call me at 425-822-7700. Sincerely, Malcol McNaughton Development Coordinator 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201,Kirkland,Washington 98033 (425)822-7700 Fax(425)827-4098 06/11/98 THU 12.00 FAX 2536614129 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY lit)002 abr lkii iy j 1 r:41 Yab M556 ADOLFSON ASSC PAGE 02 u0%10/U REP 1ti:51 FAX 25356 6 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ®OO2 nRECEIj --^OMMUNr 4 1'DE ELOk ,. ;; 1 TMS 1 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WETLANDS CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Consultant: Adolfson& Associate' 5309Shi shole Avenue NW Scatdc, WA 98 LOT Project: Campus Cilen Subdivision Wedan4 monitoring. King city Pilo No. Sii9P0114: Federal Way pile No. ) j90-PPOS Applicant: Polygon Northwest Company Date: June 10,1998 Project Planner: Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner(233)661-4082 Documents : Wetland Monitoring report prepared by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. ' (WDI) for Polygon Northwest Company. Task Scope: Review wetland mitigation sites and monitoring report prepared by the applicant's consultant. Task Schedule: Please respond by June 18, 1998. Task Cost: Not to=cad k0ca ai per your costestimate) without a prior written amendment to this Take Authorization. 1f you need any other information, please let me know_ My phone number is 253-661-4082. Acceptance: City of Federal way (Planner) Date (Cons 1 t) . Date (P r t Data 00/10/98 WED 17:43 [TI/RX NO 9449] 06/10/199B 17:42 2067099684 ADOLFSON ASSC PAGE 03 WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM DATE 4 September 1997 CITY City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way,Washington 98003 CONSULTANT Adolfson Associates, Inc. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Seattle,WA 98107 PROJECT Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring Review PROJECT APPLICANT Polygon Northwest Company TASK AUTHORIZATION No. 9727-80B CITY PLANNER -Margaret€hartt" -blAaL12.A+ � TASK SCOPE (1)Review wetland mitigation sites and monitoring report for one monitoring event in 1998. Monitoring report to be prepared by applicant's consultant. (2)Prepare letter report of findings(12 hr. @ $45/hr., $540; 1 hr. @$102/hr., $102). (3)Reimbursables(mileage, photography, etc.): $55.00. TASK SCHEDULE All work to be completed and report submitted to City staff within two weeks of receipt of signed authorization to proceed. TASK COST Not to exceed $697.00 without written amendment to this Task Authorization. DELIVERABLES Letter report 06/10/98 WED 17:43 [TX/RX NO 9449] POLYGON ►A NORTHWEST COMPANY RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT January 6, 1998 i m 199B Margaret Clark Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003-6210 RE: Campus Glen Wetland Monitoring File No. ILA-90-PPO8 Dear Margaret: Thank you for completing your review of the 1997 Wetland Mitigation Report for Campus Glen. We have recently completed several thousand dollars worth of planting and soil augmentation in the various wetland buffers. I have prepared the following itemized response to the review of the report: 1. The stem count is used to determine the percent survival of the installed plant material. The health and vigor of this material is the basis for the percent cover which is usually analyzed in the final year. 2. Photo points were established for this report. However, they were not submitted as the report was submitted in draft form after the City could not find an available time for a meeting of the parties involved. We will submit the photo as required in future reports. 3. The soil above the sewer line in Tract C has been compacted as required during construction. We are not allowed to plant trees within the easement. (Please see attached easement) 4. The reason plants were not counted in Tract G is that it was impossible to tell the difference between the planted material and the volunteers. The Adolphson review acknowledges that this area is progressing well. 5. The overall health of the buffer enhancement area is covered by the report submitted and will continue to do so. However, review of the overall health of the wetland is beyond the scope of this report and not required within the monitoring requirements. 6. Photo stations have been established and will be provided in future reports. 7. Supplemental plantings have been provided in tracts C, E, & G. Please find enclosed a copy of the As-Built and a letter verifying the installation. 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201,Kirkland,Washington 98033 (425)822-7700 Fax(425)827-4098 8. Plants may not be installed above the sewer line as access is required by the easement (Please see attached.) 9. As-built have been prepared and will be submitted shortly. We will provide future stem counts. percent of vegetative cover will be calculate based on stem counts and must be 75%by the final year of mitigation. 10. The next monitoring report will be submitted by the fall of 1998. 11. The 1997 Report shall be considered the third monitoring report based on your letter of December 23, 1996 which considers the 1996 report the second report. The final report will be submitted by the Fall of 1999. We have completed the work outlined and will submit the new as-built as requested by the City. All items and concerns raised in the review have been addressed at this time. We will continue to work in good faith with the City to complete the intent of the mitigation program. We currently have a set-aside for wetland monitoring. We would like to reduce the $6300.00 to $2700.00 to cover the final two years of monitoring based on the terms of the agreement. We have considered your suggestion of having Adolphson & Associates complete our monitoring work to reduce our costs related to this project. We have an existing relationship with Watershed Dynamics, Inc. and prefer to continue to employ their services. Should you have any questions in this matter please feel free to call me at 425-822-7700. Sincerely, ,1/( Malcolm McNaughton Development Coordinator U1/06;98 TUE 11:01 FAX 253 735 4289 WATERSHED DYNAMICS INC f0001 it I DATE: January 6, 1998 TO: Malcom McNaughton, Project Manager Polygon Northwest,Inc. FAX 1.425.827.409E SUBJECT: Status Report FROM: Larry D. Burnstad,Principal Scientist PROJECT: Campus Glen—Residential Development Mitigation Planting—Performance Monitoring Malcom— Per your request, I visited the Campus Glen site following the replanting completed by Landmark Landscaping. Mark had provided me with an as-built to direct to the areas of the site that were replanted. All of the plants that were called out for replanting have been installed. The new plant community is a different mix of plants than was shown on the original planting plans prepared by Terra Associates. The current plant community (plants that survived from the original planting plus those plants recently installed by Landmark) appears to fit the actual conditions better than the original design. I would recommend that Polygon use the as-built prepared by Landmark as the base map for future performance monitoring. Please note that the salmonbeny (Rubes spectabilis) reported missing in my initial monitoring report was not replanted. The native salmonberry is doing very well and has filled in those areas originally specified for planting. Note, too, that the cattail (Typha sp.)was not replaced due to a lack of adequate hydrology at the location specified in the original mitigation design. Finally, note that some species of plants called out in the original design were replaced with species more suited to the as-built site conditions. Substitution of plants is not an unusual circumstance following the first performance monitoring visit, This is often the recommended course of action when plant mortality can be directly attributed to adverse site conditions (i.e. shade tolerant plants planted in full sun; obligate plants planted in seasonally wet conditions). Often the mitigation plans are prepared before the actual site construction is completed so the conditions anticipated at the time the mitigation design was prepared do not exist following construction. As a result, some plants do not survive the first year following installation. If you have any questions regarding this memo or the site conditions, please call me at 1,253,735.4288. 44q6 Lakehaven Utility District 31627- 1st Avenue South • P.O. Box 4249 • Federal Way, Washington 98063 Seattle: 941-1516 • Tacoma: 927-2922 • Engineering: 941-2288 • Fax: 839-9310 • December 13, 1994 Mr. Hal Grubb Harghausen Consulting Engineering, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 RE: Campus Glen Agreement No. 94-293 Off-Site Easement for Sanitary Sewer Dear Mr. Grubb: Enclosed, in duplicate, is the revised sanitary sewer easement for the referenced project. Please have both copies signed by the owner of Westboro Apartments and return them to the District for processing. We also require a letter of acceptance of the restoration work on the affected property. Please call me if you have any questions (941-2288 ) . Sincerely, AL ohn . Jensen Engineering Technician JAJ/jmr Enclosures (2) Dale A. Cap Joel R. Marks Dick Mayer Donald L.P. Miller Beverly J.Tweddle Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner EASEMENT FOR SEWER FACILITIES THIS AGREEMENT by and between Lakehaven Utility District, a municipal corporation of King County, Washington, hereinafter termed "Grantee" and Management & Development Corporation hereinafter termed "Grantor" . WITNESSETH: That Grantor, for and in consideration' of one Dollar or other valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys to the Grantee; An easement and right-of-way for sewer facilities and all appurtenances related thereto, through, over and across the following described real property: See Exhibit "A" attached. Grantee and its agents, designees or assigns shall have the right, without prior institution of any suit or proceeding at law and without prior notice to Grantor, at such time as Grantee deems necessary, to enter upon said property, by foot or vehicle, for the installation, repair, reconstruction or maintenance of sewer facilities and appurtenances without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefore, provided that such shall be accomplished in a manner that -- existing private improvements shall not be disturbed or destroyed or in the event that they are disturbed or destroyed, they will be replaced u! or repair-ed, as nearly as is practicable, to as good a condition as they were immediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. Campus Glen , Agt. No. 94-293 Off-Site no. din wall, fence, rockery„ Grantor herebx a�r.� :. # �; . „_ . bud]. �t treeet�$�cture ole .._. ?Y kiid shall be erected, Or planted, nor, shall, e _placed within the boundaries of said easement s `© excavat on shall be made within three feet of said sewer service facilities and ' the surface level of the ground within the e° 21,= r area `shall be maintained at the elevation as currently e " g! In the event that this provision is violated, the Grantee shall have the right to require removal of any such structure and same shall be accomplished within a reasonable period of time and at Grantor's expense. Failure of Grantee to so exercise its right to require removal shall not constitute waiver of this right. Grantor additionally grants to the Grantee, its agents, designees or assigns, the use of such additional area immediately adjacent to said easement area as shall be required for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of said sewer service facilities. The use of such additional area shall be held to a reasonable minimum and be returned to the condition existing immediately before the property was entered upon by Grantee or its agents. This Agreement and each of the terms, provisions, conditions and covenants herein shall be binding upon and apply to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. ' DATED this i� day of Q1 CF M ',�--- , 19 (\`,t" By WCr&11bc.2rg �YM1NW t4W%jo4$.1WASa B K`3(5'N67 C. PA AC* S1p N'r STATE OF WASIiINGTON ) ss: County of King ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 1(9813(77 C.V)3,A ev►<-- and sy troA signed this instrument, on oath stated that they-were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the PalLtA crIq r and of WW5T-5ben(n14cv,r,►N:.�w►Wrvlto X _1SS.t .to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 8 DATED: UbNACeXX-- V1 9eiA i� o NOTARY m'; 1 PUBLIC m: 5 Notary Public I�cSj • ;•.• 71. g.9'2' .* `Title My appointment expires Il-1"Th I;xll i l�.i 1: "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION • A strip of lend, 15 feet in width, being in that portion of Westboro, a condominium, Phase I being recorded in Volume 38 of Condominiums at pages 16 through 27,the first amendment to Phase I being recorded in Volume 41 of Condominiums at pages 41 through 52 and Phase II being recorded in Volume 46 of Condominiums et pages 21 through 25, all the records of King County, Washington, the centerline of said strip being described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said condominium; THENCE South 09° 21' 29" East along the Eost Tine of said condominium, a distance of 205.64 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this described centerline; THENCE South 72° 30' 51" West, 20.20 feet; THENCE South 36° 47' 32" West, 178.58 feet; THENCE Nuntli 02" 00' 44" West, 10 foot to an onglo point in tho eont.rlino of a monitory Rawer easement recorded under Recording No. 8312150462, records of King County, Washington, end the terminus of this described centerline; Thu r idellnes of said strip shell be Icngthoned or shortened to terminate on earth nthAr, aAid east line of Westboro and said sanitary sewer easement recorded under Recording No. 8312150462. • Campus Glen Agt. No. 94-293 Off-Site RECEIVED BY POLYGON n NORTHWEST COMP 1ELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OCT 2 9 1997 October 28, 1997 Margaret Clark Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Campus Glen Wetland Monitoring File No. ILA-90-PPO8 Dear Margaret, I have become concerned with the lengthy review of Watershed Dynamics Wetland Monitoring Report by the City and their consultant. The report was submitted and payment for the review followed on September the 11th. We were hoping to have a response by this time so that we may begin any planting mitigation this season. As you know it becomes more difficult to plant during the wet months due to soil conditions and temperature restrictions. We have also found that fall planting helps ensure plant survival. I know you have had concerns with the report and had many questions of the review consultants. We are also concerned with the current mitigation situation. We would like an opportunity to address these concerns as soon as possible. I would be happy to meet with you and your consultants at any time to discuss any outstanding concerns you may have. If there is anything that I can do to expedite the review please let me know. Sincerely, it Malcolm McNaughton Development Coordinator 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201,Kirkland,Washington 98033 (425)822-7700 Fax(425)827-4098 • RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMcril 14 October 1997 (. 00#14Nah 1CT 16 199 Margaret Clark ADOLFSON City of Federal Way ASSOCIATES, INC. 33530 First Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003 Re: Campus Glen Monitoring Review Dear Margaret, At the request of the City of Federal Way, Adolfson Associates Inc. (AM)has reviewed the summer 1997 monitoring conducted by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. (WDI) for Polygon Northwest Company (PNC) at the Campus Glen residential development in Federal Way, Washington. AAI has reviewed the monitoring report and conducted a field visit on 25 September 1997 to independently assess site conditions. This letter contains comments on the monitoring methods and the overall site conditions at Campus Glen. Wetland mitigation at the Campus Glen site included wetland buffer enhancement near three wetland areas: Tract C, Tract E, and Tract G. Each buffer enhancement area will be hereby referred to as the name of the wetland Tract that it is near. Monitoring Methods The goal of mitigation site monitoring is to collect data which relates to the standards of success. The standards of success outlined in the Wetland Mitigation Plan (Terra Associates March 1994) are 75 percent vegetative cover and 80 percent survival of the installed plant materials in five years. The Mitigation Plan specifies that random and permanent plots as well as permanent photo stations should be used to conduct the monitoring. During summer 1997,monitoring was conducted by WDI,which consisted of stem counts of in Tracts C and E. However,percent cover data was not collected in any of the tracts, and a stem count was not conducted in Tract G. Without percent cover data and a stem count for Tract G, one cannot determine whether the standards of success have been met. Finally, it does not appear that photo stations were established as photos were not included in the monitoring report. Site Conditions The majority of the site does not appear to be progressing towards meeting the standards of success. The plantings observed appear to be healthy,but the number of installed plants is significantly less than the number approved in the planting plan. Fortunately, invasive species do not appear to be a problem at this time. The soils in all of the tracts were dry, compacted, and resembled fill. In particular, the soil above the sewer line in Tract C is so compacted that there are no plants growing there. Despite the lack of plants growing above the sewer line in Tract C, the plantings to the east and west of the sewer line appear to be progressing well; it is difficult to distinguish the installed plantings from recruited vegetation which is good. There are very few plants surviving in Tract E. It has been Environmental Analysis 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW Seattle, WA 98107 adolfton@adolfton.com (206)789-9658 FAX(206)789-9684 CO Margaret Clark/Campus Glen Page 2 10/2/97 mowed, which may have resulted in mowing some of the installed plantings. There were no installed plants observed in Tract G; the only vegetation growing in this area was recruited red alder. Compliance with the Approved Mitigation Plan In order to meet the standards of success, supplemental plantings will be necessary. We concur with the species substitutions and planting recommendations made by WDI in the monitoring report. In addition, the following items will be necessary to meet the requirements of the approved mitigation plan: • During future monitoring visits,percent cover data should be collected within each tract. The established transects in Tract C and E could be used for locating permanent and random data plots. • Future monitoring efforts should also assess the overall health of each buffer enhancement area and the nearby existing wetland. Specifically,the health of the trees in the existing wetland Tract G should be monitored. • Photo stations should be established to document the site's progress and photos should be included in the monitoring report. • Supplemental plantings are necessary throughout the buffer enhancement areas near Tracts E and G. • Plantings should be installed above the sewer line in Tract C unless access to this sewer line is necessary. • Following the additional plantings this fall, an as-built should be prepared. Future stem counts should be compared to this as-built to calculate percent survival. • The next monitoring report is due to the City in the fall of 1998. • Monitoring should continue through the fifth year,which will be the year 2000, as stated in the Mitigation Plan. In summary, additional plantings are necessary at this time in order to achieve the standards of success in five years. Fall is the ideal time to install plants so that root growth occurs prior to the first frost. However, plantings can be installed throughout the winter until April 1. Additionally,we recommend soil amendments in all tracts,but particularly above the sewer line in Tract C. Fortunately,PNC is aware of the corrective actions necessary and they are making arrangements to install additional plantings this fall. We are pleased to have the opportunity to prepare this document for you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Andy or me at 789-9658. Thank you. Sincerely, ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES INC. • Jennifer Goodridge Staff Biologist MEMO To: Jennifer Goodridge, Adolfson Associates, Inc. From: Margaret H. Clark, AICP Subject: Campus Glen 2nd Year Monitoring Date: October 3, 1997 I have reviewed the Campus Glen Monitoring Review. Could you please add the following to your report which will then be forwarded to Polygon by the City. 1. Please specify when the plantings should be installed? Pik t 2. Does Adolfson want to be on site when the plantings are being installed or will the As- Built suffice? 3. Please specify when the next monitoring report is due? 4. The City has concerns about the survival of the plants and existing trees in Tract G. Are they at risk? Should you have any questions, please call me at 253-661-4111. L•\CMPUSGLN\MONITOR2.M1/October 3, 1997 10/82/1987 15:15 2067899684 ADOLFSON A 2067899684 PAGE 01 A. . Associates,ors mc , 5309 Shade Arms NW Seattle, WA 98107-5318 PHONE (206) 789r658 FAX 46496... FAX(206) 789-9684 Date Time 3 : a� Job # be,t- 2 t1�l47 97d 7 - ec To: Name: • . l4a22.re# v c Fa3"frrS3) '40W From: JC.no r. :: Pages (Including Cdier): . Original via mall: ►�4 Subject: Herec. ovr . rvie (A) are Cu bus 662�. .., h'18hr r oey. KyL44.0 i-F yerA, �1CcUC Gtr� Coln �c�'l`S C:Inccli ` I pr.c.5 ; * pH Aa 1(15p1/1 MKS c-k0/4;4v— CC: . IF YOU.' T RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (206) 789-9658 10/@2/1997 15:15 2067899684 ADOLFSON A 2067899684 PAGE 02 • 2 October 1997 a40*iiiss A.J)OI.FSoN Margaret Clark ASsOcIA"11:s. INc. City of Federal Way 33530 First Way Soh, Federal Way,Washington 98003 Re: Ca :Glee mpUs Mo Itoring Review Dear Margaret, At the request of the. ';ty of Federal Way,Adolfson Associates Inc. (AM)has reviewed the Summer 1997 monit tig:conducted by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. (WDI) for Polygon Northwest Cornpany NC . t:.the Campus Glen residential development in Federal Way, Washington: AM l ;tevleWed.the monitoring report and conducted a field visit on 25 September 1997.to independently assess site conditions. This letter contains comments on the monitoring method and the overall site conditions at Campus Glen. Wetland mitigation at the Campus Glen site ineiuded'vettand buffer enhancement in three areas: Tract C,Tract E, and Tract G. MonitoringMethodic, • . The goal of mitigation bite monitoring is to collect data which relates to the standards of success. The standards of suOc S d in the Wetland Mitigation Plan (Terra Associates March 1994) are 75 percent vegetaiiiie.cover.and 80 percent survival of the installed plant materials in five years. The 14titigalan •fi es;.that random and permanent plots as well as permanent photo stationashott4be{reed to conduct the monitoring: During Sa*.199.7 gionitoting was Conducted by WDI,which consisted of stem counts in Tracts C and E. I40*evec1.percent.cover data was not collected in any of the tracts, and a stem count was noteondneted in`.6. • G. Without percent cover data and a stem count for Tract G, one cannot dete*" S°ia standards of success have been met. Finally, it does not appear that photo stons'ware established as photos were not included in the monitoring report. Site Conditions The majority;ofthe,st adoesDot appear to be progressing towards meeting the standards of success. The pla *,obaerVed:appear to be healthy,but the number of installed plants is significantly less than the,rium ber approved,in the planting plan. Fortunately,invasive species do not appear to be a probls at this time. The soils in all of the tracts were dry, compacted, and resembled fill: In particular, ;the soil above the sewer line in Tract C is so compacted that there are no plants growing there: Environmental Analysts 5909 Shilsholt Ate. NW Seattle,WA 98207 adolfsoneadolton.com (206)789-9658 F 4X 1706)78 9•968,i Cp 10/Q2/1997 15:15 2067899684 ADOLFSON A 2067899684 PAGE 03 • Margaret Gark/CampR3 Glen Page 2 10/2/97 . Despite the:lack of plants:powing above the sewer line in Tract C, the plantings to the east and west of the`sewer.li .appeer to•be.progressing well; it is difficult to distinguish the installed plantings from recruited:vegpaation;which is good. There are very few plants surviving in Tract E. It has been mirivt4,:*hios.may have resulted in mowing some of the installed plantings. There were:no.instaliCdplaflts.observed`in Tract G; the only vegetation growing in this area was recruited radAlder; Compliance with the-*ppd Mitigation Plan In order to meet the atsiidarda of success,supplemental plantings will be necessary. We concur with the species subsvand planting recommendations made by WDI in the monitoring report. In addition;Oialf011aWing items will be necessary to meet the requirements of the approved mitigation;p • During fittUremonitoring:•visits,percent cover data`should be collected within each tract. The established tranialtin'traCct C.and:E could be used for locating permanent and random data plots. • Photo stations.s ;d be;established to document the site's progress and photos should be included In{ha 'report:. • Supplementati**n$s ar 'necessary throughout Tracts E and G. • Plantings ShOuld'beinatilied above the sewer line in Tract C unless access to this sewer line is necesaa y • Followi46 the 40nga'16is fall,an as-built should be prepared. Future stem counts shouldtK4, ` o t ia:u-built to calculate percent survival • Monitoring stu 1d cnnt1ue through the fifth year,which will be the year 2000, as stated in the Midg#tion In summary,additiMMVpientIngs are necessary at this time in order to achieve the standards of success in five years Additional y,;we ecommend soil amendments in all tracts,but particularly above the sewer line in Tract'C: Fortunately,PNC is aware of the corrective actions necessary and they inakiiig*Mngemients to.inStall additional plantings this fall. We are pleased tO bit the opportunity to prepare this document for you. If you have any questions,please feelketfre.ii.to contact Andy or me at 789,9658. Thank you. Sincerely, ADOLFSON ASS PATES:INC• Jennifer Goodridge-;.•. • ' StaffBiologigt MITIGATION PROJECT MONITORING REPORT PROJECT NAME: Campus Glen Residential Development Federal Way, Washington PROJECT OWNER: Polygon Northwest Company Kirkland, Washington OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: Mr. Eric H.G. Wells, Vice President, Development MONITORING CONDUCTED BY: Watershed Dynamics, Inc. Larry D. Burnstad/Marcelle V. Lynde DATE OF MONITORING: July 2 and July 9, 1 997 DATE OF REPORT: August 4, 1997 REPORT PREPARED BY: Larry D. Burnstad, Principal Biologist INTRODUCTION Watershed Dynamics, Inc. (WDI) conducted an evaluation of wetland mitigation sites associated with the Campus Glen Residential development in Federal Way, Washington. Polygon Northwest Company (PNW) directed WDI to review onsite conditions and prepare a report presenting and explaining the results of that review. This report was to be submitted to the City of Federal Way (CITY) in compliance with existing plat conditions. Wetland mitigation projects are typically monitored over a period of several years to determine the level of success the mitigation effort has achieved. Often the original design, approved by the regulatory agency, is modified during construction to best fit actual site conditions. An "as-built" site plan is generally developed to what was actually constructed (or planted). This as-built plan is used by both the owner's and regulator's staff to conduct post-construction compliance/performance monitoring. The as-built plan is the template used to compare field conditions observed in the years following construction with field conditions that existed at the end of construction. PURPOSE The primary purpose of this document is to present information gathered during field visits to the project site. A secondary purpose is to provide an assessment of the current conditions and present various options which could be pursued in the future. Mitigation Monitoring Report - Page 1 Campus Glen Residential Development o67 DESCRIPTION OF MONITORING EFFORT Background Data Prior to visiting the project site, WDI staff review the information available regarding the mitigation planning and mitigation efforts. PNW provided WDI with documents prepared by Parametrix, Inc. (PMI), Terra Associates, Inc. (TAI), Adolphson Associates, Inc. (AAI), the CITY, and PNW. These documents were reviewed to determine: (1) the impacts of the project upon identified wetlands and the associated wetland buffers, (2) the proposed mitigation plan to mitigate the identified impacts, and (3) the as-built condition at the end of construction. Based on these documents, WDI determined that the original wetland delineation was completed by PMI in 1992. PMI delineated four wetlands, Wetland #1, Wetland #6, Wetland #8, and Wetland #10, on the site. According to PMI, only two areas would be affected by the development. Wetland #6 (NGPE Tract G) would have a retention- detention pond constructed within the buffer along the south side. Wetland #8 (NGPE Tract C) would have a sewer line constructed in the buffer along the east side. Apparently, the CITY required PNW to prepare a mitigation plan which was completed by TAI in January, 1994. Following a review by W&H Pacific (the CITY's wetland consultant), the plan was revised to comply with CITY regulations. This revision, dated 3/28/94, is apparently the final mitigation plan. It called for wetland mitigation and buffer enhancement in Wetland #6, Wetland #8, and Wetland #10 (NGPE Tract E). The mitigation areas were planted in November 1994 with a post-installation monitoring review by TAI being completed one week after planting was completed. According to TAI, the mitigation planting was completed "in accordance with the intent of the Buffer Enhancement Plan". TAI noted that final grading of the compensating Storage Area (near NGPE Tract G) varied from the grading shown on the approved plans. According to TAI documents, the plants were installed in different areas than those designated on the plans to compensate for differences in actual and proposed grading as well as anticipated water depths. TAI reiterated the plants were "installed to satisfy the intent of the Wetland Planting Plan." In January 1995, the CITY directed PNW to undertake certain actions to satisfy conditions required for release of the Performance Bonds associated with the mitigation projects. TAP completed a monitoring visit in June 1995 and reported that "the materials were viable and buds showed evidence of the initiation of new growth." The report did not, however, provide specific information regarding numbers and locations of plants or exact areas where surveys were conducted. In October 1995, PNW submitted an "as-built" plan to the CITY which was forwarded to AAI for technical review and comment. AAI visited the site on October 11, 1995. Mitigation Monitoring Report-Page 2 Campus Glen Residential Development • DRAFT The site visit was conducted to compare the "as-built" condition with what actually existed on the ground. AAI made a second trip on November 26, 1996 to further evaluate site conditions. In a comprehensive report dated December 4, 1996, AAI noted several issues needing resolve and inconsistencies between the as-built plans and the existing on site condition. The CITY indicated that the issues would have to be addressed and corrected by PNW prior to release of the bonds. Field Data On July 2, 1997, WDI staff visited two of the three wetland mitigation areas within the project boundary, Wetland #8 (NGPE Tract C) and Wetland #10 (NGPE Tract E). Using the as-built plans as a guide, WDI established three 100-foot transects for use in enumerating existing plant growth within the mitigation areas. In addition, WDI conducted a complete accounting of large plant specimens that were installed. One of the transects was in Tract C and two transects were placed in Tract E. The results of WDI's effort are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. On July 9, 1997, WDI visited Tract G to determine the existing condition. Due to the deviation between the original plans, the as-built drawings, and the actual on site condition, WDI did not establish a monitoring transect and did not enumerate large plants within the mitigation area. RESULTS In all cases, the plants that were reported as installed on the as-built differed substantially in quantity and species from what was actually observed on the site (see Table 1 and Table 2). For example, 15 vine maple were supposed to be planted in Tract E along with 14 Douglas fir. WDI found 6 live vine maple, 1 dead specimen, and 8 plants were missing. WDI found that only 6 Douglas fir had survived, 1 dead specimen was found, and 7 were missing. Interestingly, the several homes immediately across the street had very nice Douglas fir, approximately the same size, growing in the front yard areas. WDI's observations of the mitigation planting results were similar to those reported by AAI in December 1996. WDI was unable to address the issues raised by AAI, the CITY's technical review consultant, in their December 4, 1996 letter. This difficulty arose for several reasons. First, WDI did riot have a copy of the as-built used by AAI and does not know if the as-built WDI staff used is the same as that used by AAI. Second, the AAI report reported only the plants it found that were listed on the as-built and did not offer any comment regarding what plants had volunteered on the site a were contributing to an improved on site condition. Mitigation Monitoring Report -Page 3 Campus Glen Residential Development (441,...4) Table 1. Native Growth Protection Easement. Tract C July 2, 1997 Field Investigation Common Scientific Survival Name Name Qtv Live Stressed Dead Missing Total 1997 Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 6 0 0 O 6 0 0% Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga menzicsii 17 8 0 7 2 8 47% additional volunteers present Vine Maple Acer circinatum 13 11 0 1 1 II 85% Huckleberry Vaccinium sp. 4 4 0 O 0 4 100% Salmonbenl' Ruhus spcctahilis 85 0 0 0 85 0 0% Table 2. Native Growth Protection Easement. Tract E July 2, 1997 Field Investigation Common Scientific Survival Name Name Qtv Live Stressed Dead Missing Total 1997 Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga mcnzicsii 14 6 0 1 1 6 43% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 15 6 0 1 8 6 40% Huckleberry Vccinium sp. 16 0 0 0 16 0 0% Wild Rose Rosa spp. 27 4 0 0 23 0 7% DRgPr Third, the AAI report did not address the adequacy or practicality of the original planting plans to determine if actual site conditions supported the apparent discrepancies between the original plan, the "as-built" plan, and the observed on site conditions. For example, the lack of adequate hydrology and hydric soils in the compensating storage area as it was constructed warranted reconsideration of what plants should have been installed. From WDI's evaluation of the background data, the approved mitigation plans did not require the importing of hydric soils into the designated wetland planting area. The approved plan did not appear to have any evaluation of site hydrology to determine if sufficient hydrology could be attained during the growing season to support cattail growth. Fourth, the approved mitigation plan did not address the extent the compensating storage area would have to be enlarged to compensate for the storage capacity lost to plant growth in the pond. In most cases, a pond that fills with cattails holds 50% or less water volume than a pond that is free of vegetation. WDI would recommend not planting the pond bottom and focusing planting along the pond bank areas. By doing this, the buffer area is enhanced with the appropriate plants and storage volume is maximized (assuming proper plant maintenance over time). Finally, the planting plan for Tract C called installation of plants and augmented soil in the area where the sewer line is located. The CITY approved this concept but the sewer district did not want the easement to be replanted to there was a conflict in direction from two regulators providing input to the owner. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS There are areas in all three mitigation sites that need to have plants replaced. WDI has concluded, however, that the owner should focus on planting only the trees and shrubs that appear to be missing or were found dead in Tract C and Tract E. In both areas, there are native plants volunteering into the planted areas and should fill in adequately over time. In Tract C, the volunteer salmonberry, red-osier dogwood, and cedar plants are numerous and vigorous. WDI recommends concentrating on replanting missing Douglas fir and vine maple in Tract C. In Tract E, WDI does not recommend replanting the red huckleberry and vine maple. Instead, WDI recommends replacing the vine maple and red huckleberry with black hawthorn, ocean spray, or snowberry which are better suited to dry, sunny sites. With permission from the CITY, WDI recommends the size of Douglas fir to be replanted should be reduced to sapling (1' to 2' tall) size plants and the number of stems should be increased to 14 total replants. By planting more smaller plants, the chance that at least 7 plants will survive is increased and the risk of trees being intentionally removed is reduced. This should not present a significant hardship to PNW since the smaller specimens are less expensive to purchase and to install. Mitigation Monitoring Report-Page 4 Campus Glen Residential Development WDI would recommend that soil amendment be added only in the pit areas being dug to plant the replacement trees and shrubs. WDI does not recommend installing the broad area of soil amendment shown on the original plans in the area of the sewer line in Tract C. Also, in Tract C, an effort should be made to show the storm sewer maintenance access area on the as-built plans and should adjust the location of the plants to show the existing condition. There should be no effort to plant the numerous salmonberry shown on the planting plan for Tract C The volunteer plants will eventually fill is sufficiently and the sewer district may maintain (reduce dense growth) the plants within their right-of-way. The amount of planting in the sewer line corridor should be based upon an agreement between the CITY and the sewer district. In Tract G, the planted area along the edges of the compensating storage area should be planted along the north side to replace the stunted red-osier dogwood. The dogwood could be transplanted to the south side which has better shade and moisture. Willow, red alder, and/or salmonberry 'starts" should be planted along the northern edge of the compensating storage pond to enhance the buffer area adjacent to the wetland. Based on the field evidence, no further planting of wetland species is warranted in Tract G. This area should be left as it is to assure adequate compensating storage volume. Upon completion of the planting, PNW may wish to approach the CITY to request acceptance of the mitigation plan as a successful effort. If the CITY is inclined to require further monitoring, such an effort could be initiated in November, 1997 to allow for maximum plant growth during the remainder of the summer. A followup visit in May, 1998 should be sufficient to show mitigation success. Mitigation Monitoring Report -Page 5 Campus Glen Residential Development e RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2 October 1997 O C T " 3 1997 00071ani AD OLFSON Margaret Clark ASSOCIATES, INC. City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003 Re: Campus Glen Monitoring Review Dear Margaret, At the request of the City of Federal Way, Adolfson Associates Inc. (AAI)has reviewed the Summer 1997 monitoring conducted by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. (WDI) for Polygon Northwest Company(PNC) at the Campus Glen residential development in Federal Way, Washington. AAI has reviewed the monitoring report and conducted a field visit on 25 September 1997 to independently assess site conditions. This letter contains comments on the monitoring methods and the overall site conditions at Campus Glen. Wetland mitigation at the Campus Glen site included wetland buffer enhancement in three areas: Tract C, Tract E, and Tract G. Monitoring Methods The goal of mitigation site monitoring is to collect data which relates to the standards of success. The standards of success outlined in the Wetland Mitigation Plan (Terra Associates March 1994) are 75 percent vegetative cover and 80 percent survival of the installed plant materials in five years. The Mitigation Plan specifies that random and permanent plots as well as permanent photo stations should be used to conduct the monitoring. During Summer 1997, monitoring was conducted by WDI,which consisted of stem counts in Tracts C and E. However,percent cover data was not collected in any of the tracts, and a stem count was not conducted in Tract G. Without percent cover data and a stem count for Tract G, one cannot determine whether the standards of success have been met. Finally, it does not appear that photo stations were established as photos were not included in the monitoring report. Site Conditions The majority of the site does not appear to be progressing towards meeting the standards of success. The plantings observed appear to be healthy,but the number of installed plants is significantly less than the number approved in the planting plan. Fortunately, invasive species do not appear to be a problem at this time. The soils in all of the tracts were dry, compacted, and resembled fill. In particular,the soil above the sewer line in Tract C is so compacted that there are no plants growing there. Environmental Analysis 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW Seattle, WA 98107 adolfton@adolon.com (206)789-9658 FAX(206)789-9684 0 Margaret Clark/Campus Glen Page 2 10/2/97 Despite the lack of plants growing above the sewer line in Tract C,the plantings to the east and west of the sewer line appear to be progressing well; it is difficult to distinguish the installed plantings from recruited vegetation which is good. There are very few plants surviving in Tract E. It has been mowed,which may have resulted in mowing some of the installed plantings. There were no installed plants observed in Tract G; the only vegetation growing in this area was recruited red alder. Compliance with the Approved Mitigation Plan In order to meet the standards of success, supplemental plantings will be necessary. We concur with the species substitutions and planting recommendations made by WDI in the monitoring report. In addition, the following items will be necessary to meet the requirements of the approved mitigation plan: • During future monitoring visits,percent cover data should be collected within each tract. The established transects in Tract C and E could be used for locating permanent and random data plots. • Photo stations should be established to document the site's progress and photos should be included in the monitoring report. • Supplemental plantings are necessary throughout Tracts E and G. • Plantings should be installed above the sewer line in Tract C unless access to this sewer line is necessary. • Following the additional plantings this fall, an as-built should be prepared. Future stem counts should be compared to this as-built to calculate percent survival. • Monitoring should continue through the fifth year,which will be the year 2000, as stated in the Mitigation Plan. In summary, additional plantings are necessary at this time in order to achieve the standards of success in five years. Additionally,we recommend soil amendments in all tracts,but particularly above the sewer line in Tract C. Fortunately,PNC is aware of the corrective actions necessary and they are making arrangements to install additional plantings this fall. We are pleased to have the opportunity to prepare this document for you. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact Andy or me at 789-9658. Thank you. Sincerely, ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES INC. 4426:t�� Jennifer Goodridge Staff Biologist MEMO To: Andy Castelle From: Margaret H. Clark, AICP Subject: Campus Glen Monitoring Date: September 12, 1997 Enclosed are the following: 1. Original As Built. Please return once you have finished with it. 2. Signed copy of authorization form. Once we have received a check for the work from Polygon, I will call you and the work can thereafter commence. 3. Copy of November 20, 1996 memorandum outlining history of wetland mitigation to November 20, 1996. Please call me at (253) 661-4111 if you have any questions. I:\CMPUSGLN\ANDYMEMO.1/September 12, 1997 4V04011/ 5 September 1997 ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. To: Margeret Clark, City of Federal Way From: Andy Castelle, Adolfson Associates, Inc. RE: Campus Glen Margaret, Enclosed please find 2 copies of each of the Task Authorizations needed to complete the wetland mitigation monitoring review for Campus Glen. Please sign all 6 copies, and return one set to us; the other set is for your records. We are looking forward to working with you on this portion of this project. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 789-9658. 4A/V7 RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SEP081997 Environmental Analysis 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW Seattle, WA 98107 adolfton@adolfton.com (206)789-9658 FAX(206)789-9684 0 *' WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM DATE 4 September 1997 CITY City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003 CONSULTANT Adolfson Associates, Inc. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Seattle, WA 98107 PROJECT Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring Review PROJECT APPLICANT Polygon Northwest Company TASK AUTHORIZATION No. 9727-80A CITY PLANNER Margaret Clark TASK SCOPE (1)Review wetland mitigation sites and monitoring report for one monitoring event in 1997. Monitoring report to be prepared by applicant's consultant. (2)Prepare letter report of findings (12 hr. @ $43/hr., $516; 1 hr. @ $100/hr., $100). (3)Reimbursables (mileage, photography, etc.): $55.00. TASK SCHEDULE All work to be completed and report submitted to City staff within two weeks of receipt of signed authorization to proceed. TASK COST ' Not to exceed $666.00 without written amendment to this Task Authorization. DELIVERABLES Letter report ACCEPTANCE Avi a,o-- U- Lta,-1- Date: Ar /i c4?7 City of Fede7 ay i ' Date: 4 September 1997 Adolfson Asso ations, Inc. POLYGON ral NORTHWEST COMPANY September 11, 1997 Margaret Clark Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Campus Glen Wetland Monitoring File No. ILA-90-PPO8 Dear Margaret, Per our conversation yesterday morning I am enclosing a check for $666.00 for the review of Campus Glen Wetland Monitoring Report. I understand that this work will be billed o a time and materials basis by Adolphson & Associates. Should you have any questions please feel free to call me at 822-7700. Sine rel , Malcolm McNaughton Development Coordinator RECEVED BY "°,F ,C -'%7Q4\ T?.BEN? 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201, Kirkland,Washington 98033 (206)822-7700 Fax(206)827-4098 • r 1686 POLYGON PERMIT ACCOUNT 4030 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD., STE. 201 19-10 1 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 Sept. 11 is 97 1250 PAY TO THE ORDE of City of Federal Way . $666.00 *** Six Hundred Sixty-six and No/100********************************************* DOLLARS TW SIGNATURES REQUIRED • 1.1....1.71. BANK r SEATTLE MAIN OFFICE 1420 FIFTH AVENUE,P.O.BOX 720 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98111-0720 U.S.BANK OF WASHINGTON,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION MY • II'00 L6861I' 1: L 2 5000 LO 51: 00 L? 9 26 3 20n■ DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT POLYGON PERMIT ACCOUNT THE ATTACHED CHECK IS IN PAYMENT OF ITEMS DESCRIBED BELOW. IF NOT CORRECT PLEASE NOTIFY US PROMPTLY. NO RECEIPT DESIRED. DELUXE FORM DVC-2 V-2 DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 9/11/97 City of Federal Way $666.00 Campus Glen - phase 4 wetland mitigation report review V-2 4' I FAX Transmission Sheet City of Federal Way FAX Number: 1-(206)-661-4024 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003 Phone: (206) 661-4111 Date: September 12, 1997 From: Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner To: Malcolm McNaughton Company: Polygon Northwest Company Fax No.: (206) 827-4098 Subject: Second Year Wetlands Monitoring You should receive 3 page(s) including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all pages, please call Margaret Clark at (206) 661-4111 . COMMENTS: Enclosed is a copy of the authorization form authorizing Adolfson Associates to review the Watershed Dynamics Monitoring Report, do a site inspection, and provide us with feedback. Once the city has received the check for $666.00, we will formally authorize the work. Adolfson will then contact Water Shed Dynamics if there are any questions about the report I:\CMPUSGLN\MONITOR.FAX/September 12, 1997 WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM DATE 4 September 1997 CITY City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003 CONSULTANT Adolfson Associates, Inc. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Seattle, WA 98107 PROJECT Campus Glen Mitigation Monitoring Review PROJECT APPLICANT Polygon Northwest Company TASK AUTHORIZATION No. 9727-80A CITY PLANNER Margaret Clark TASK SCOPE (1)Review wetland mitigation sites and monitoring report for one monitoring event in 1997. Monitoring report to be prepared by applicant's consultant. (2)Prepare letter report of findings (12 hr. @ $43/hr., $516; 1 hr. @ $100/hr., $100). (3)Reimbursables (mileage, photography, etc.): $55.00. TASK SCHEDULE All work to be completed and report submitted to City staff within two weeks of receipt of signed authorization to proceed. TASK COST ' Not to exceed $666.00 without written amendment to this Task Authorization. DELIVERABLES Letter report fib, w ACCEPTANCE (-Yr G.A.Ar Date: ,.. r' (??7 City of F r Wa Date: 4 September 1997 Adolfson Ms ciations, Inc. , POLYGON el NORTHWEST COMPANY E .MMUNR VyEQ 3 ARTMEN r August 26, 1997 lq '!, Margaret Clark Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Campus Glen Wetland Monitoring File No. ILA-90-PP08 Dear Margaret, Per our conversation this morning we are enclosing a copy of the Watershed Dynamics, Inc. Wetland monitoring report. we have also forwarded a copy to Adolphson & Associates. We would like to move forward with this project e are prepared to pay the City's consultant immediately upon notification in order to expedite the process. Should it become necessary to meet to discuss the wetland monitoring program we would like to do so as soon as possible. We would also request a response to the report within the next two weeks. Should you have any questions please feel free to call me at 822-7700. Sincerely Malcolm McNaughton Development Coordinator 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201, Kirkland,Washington 98033 (206)822-7700 Fax(206)827-4098 POLYGON n NORTHWEST COMPANY July 10, 1997 Margaret Clark, AICP Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Campus Glen Dear Margaret: I am writing to you regarding the status of the Campus Glen Buffer Enhancement Areas and Compensating Storage Pond. As you may remember from our conversation several weeks ago, I am new with Polygon and working with Eric Wells in development. Part of my job is to complete projects that remain open. The Campus Glen mitigation and monitoring has been unattended. I am not aware of the entire history of the project but I know that we would like to fulfill our commitment with the City. In order to accomplish this we have contracted the services of Larry Burnstead of Watershed Dynamics Inc. to assess and monitor the areas in question. Yesterday Larry, Eric, Mark Howard of Landmark Landscaping (who originally installed the plant material) and myself met at the site to make an assessment of the existing conditions and discuss possible courses of action. A letter is forthcoming from Larry Burnstead that outlines his assessment and recommendations for the project. Due to a death in his family and the severe illness of another family member, Larry will be available on a limited basis for the next few weeks. We would like to arrange a meeting with you, Keith Fabing, Larry, Eric and myself on the 19th of August to discuss Larry's findings and determine an appropriate course of action. Please let me know if that date and at what time it would be convenient to meet. Should you have any further questions in this matter please feel free to call me at 822- 7700. Sincerely r4i Malcolm McNaughton Development Coordinator RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL, 1 1997 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201, Kirkland,Washington 98033 (206)822-7700 Fax(206)827-4098 r 'Jl111) COM1MUNITYDEVELOPMEiv December 4, 1996 AO4itlanh DECO 9 1996 ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Margaret Clark, Senior Planner City of Federal Way 9625-26 Department of Community Development Services 33530 First Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003-6210 RE: Campus Glen Planting Plan As-Built Inspection (File No. ILA-90-PP08) Dear Margaret: At your request, Adolfson Associates, Inc. (AAI) has reviewed the Campus Glen wetland mitigation planting plan to determine whether plant materials have been installed in substantial compliance with the approved mitigation plan sheets titled Wetland Planting Plan: Compensating Storage Pond, Tract G, Campus Glen, Federal Way, Washington (hereafter referred to as "Tract G"), and Buffer Enhancement Plan: NGPE Tracts C and E, Campus Glen, Federal Way, Washington (hereafter individually refereed to as "Tract C" and "Tract E"). The plans were prepared for Polygon Northwest Company by Terra Associates, Inc. dated January 19, 1994 (revised March 29, 1994). AAI understands that the City of Federal Way considers that the monitoring period began immediately after completion of plant material installation on December 1, 1994. Field inspections were completed by AAI on October 11, 1995 and November 26, 1996. Tables 1, 2, and 3 (attached) summarize the quantity of plant materials depicted on the As-built planting plans, growth status, total plants identified in the field, and percent survivability of individual species of installed plant materials. These comments are based on a review of the revised plan that addresses comments submitted in a letter on May 8, 1995 to Eric Wells of Polygon Northwest Company from Margaret Clark of the City of Federal Way. The following is a list of the information requested in the May 1995 letter (described in bold), a summary of how each item was addressed in the revised mitigation plan (described in normal type), and items which require further action (described in italics). Additional analysis and comments are provided in the following section. 1. List and depict all installed plantings by species. The following is a list of inconsistencies between the planting plan As-built and the plant schedule in Tract G. a. The planting plan As-built depicts 155 willow slips. The plant schedule indicates 170 willow slips. Environmental Analysis 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW, Seattle, WA 98107 Phone(206)789-9658 Fax(206)789-9684 Cf# Margaret Clark, City of Federal Way December 4, 1996 Page 2 b. The planting plan As-built depicts 81 salmonberry plantings. The plant schedule indicates 80 salmonberry plantings. c. Eight installed salmonberry plantings were discovered in an area depicted on the planting plan As-built as an unlabeled circle located in northeast corner of Tract G during the October 11, 1995 field investigation. d. The planting plan As-built depicts 73 bulrush plantings. The plant schedule indicates 120 bulrush plantings. e. The planting plan As-built depicts four areas where slough sedge was to be installed. Only two of these areas describe the quantities installed. The following is a list of inconsistencies between the planting plan As-built and the plant schedule in Tract C. f. The planting plan As-built depicts installation of 14 unknown plant materials identified with a circled "d" symbol. This symbol is not called out in the plant schedule. g. The planting plan As-built depicts 17 Douglas-fir. The plant schedule indicates 16 Douglas-fir. h. The planting plan As-built depicts 13 vine maple. The plant schedule indicates 15 vine maple. i. The planting plan As-built depicts 4 huckleberry. The plant schedule indicates 12 huckleberry. The following item identifies an inconsistency between the planting plan As-built and the plant schedule in Tract E. j. The planting plan As-built depicts 14 Douglas-fir. The plant schedule indicates 16 Douglas-fir. Please address the following items in a revised As-built plan in the 1996 monitoring report submittal: i. Correct the inconsistencies between the planting plan As-built and the As-built plant schedule which are listed above. ii. Investigate the area depicted on the Tract G planting plan As-built as an unlabeled circle located in northeast corner of Tract G. Confirm whether salmonberry were installed in this area. If so, label the circle with the correct number of plant materials installed. Margaret Clark, City of Federal Way December 4, 1996 Page 3 iii. The Tract G planting plan As-built depicts four areas where slough sedge was to be installed. Describe the quantities in the two areas which do not indicate the quantities installed. iv. Adjust all three plant schedules to reflect the As-built planting plan by placing the As-built quantities in a separate column next to the quantities in the approved mitigation planting plans dated January 19, 1994 (revised March 29, 1994). v. Provide As-built quantities for slough sedge in all planted areas. vi. Identify the unknown plant material with a circled "d" symbol in Tract C. 2. Specify existing vigor status (live, stressed, or dead). Vigor status was not provided for installed plant materials. Please provide an updated installed plant material inventory including vigor status for all plant materials in the 1996 monitoring report submittal. Utilize the format outlined in Tables 1, 2 and 3 to summarize plant material inventory data. 3. Provide a post-construction topographic survey completed to a one-foot contour resolution. A post-construction topographic survey was provided as requested. No further action is required. 4. Regrade and stabilize Lots 61 and 62 and remove any slide material from the wetland and buffer in Tract G. I understand that this work has been completed and addressed by the Public Works Department. No further action is required. 5. Remove all debris and trash from all on-site wetlands and their buffers. No trash or debris was observed within on-site wetlands, wetland buffers, or within the Compensating Storage Pond in Tract G. Continue to monitor for the presence of debris and trash within on-site wetlands, wetland buffers, or within the Compensating Storage Pond in Tract G. Maintain an active and ongoing maintenance program addressing this issue. Please report the status of trash and debris in all monitoring report submittals. • Margaret Clark, City of Federal Way December 4, 1996 Page 4 These comments are based on a review of the revised plan that addresses items listed under "Task Scope," Item 3 in the Task Authorization for Campus Glen Wetland Inspection Follow Up dated November 20, 1996 that you submitted to AAI. The following is a list of the information requested in Item 3 (described in bold), a summary of how each item was addressed in the revised mitigation plan (described in normal type), and items which require further action (described in italics). 1. Is the As- Built Acceptable? If not, what needs to be done to the As-Built? As-built revisions requirements are outlined above. 2. Have the plants been installed in accordance with the approved enhancement plan? If not, what additional plants need to be installed? 3. What is the status of the plants within the enhancement/compensation area within Tract G? If these plants are not meeting the goals of the wetland enhancement plan, do you have any recommendations? Quantities of plant materials which are dead or missing are listed in the attached three tables. Discrepancies between the quantities of plant materials described in the approved planting plan and those quantities depicted in the As-built plan are significant. These discrepancies will be summarized in the As-built revision requirements outlined in Recommendation 1.iv. in italics above. The determination of the success in achieving the mitigation goals and objectives was stated in the approved wetland mitigation plan in a letter to Gary Young, Polygon Northwest, Inc. from Garet Munger, Terra Associates, Inc. dated January 19, 1994 (revised March 29, 1994). In order to assess the success of the mitigation project to date, average percent cover (including installed plant materials and recruited native and non-native species) within plant community types identified on the planting plan must be determined. The mitigation is considered to be a success if a minimum of 75 percent average vegetative cover is achieved after three years throughout the wetland and buffer areas reflecting native plant species composition which meet the intent of the mitigation goals as described in the Mitigation Plan letter. Percent cover data along with an updated installed plant material inventory will be provided in a monitoring report prepared by a wetland biologist as described in the "Monitoring" section of the Mitigation Plan letter. After percent cover data plots are field verified by the City of Federal Way, AAI can provide recommendations on quantities and species composition of additional plants which may need to be installed. Margaret Clark,City of Federal Way December 4, 1996 Page 5 Additional Comments 1. The planting plan calls out "Bulrush" as "Scirpus macrocarpus." The correct species name for this bulrush species is "microcarpus." Please correct this species name for bulrush in the 1996 monitoring report submittal. 2. Due to the observed high water level within the compensating storage pond within Tract G during both the October 1995 and November 1996 field investigations, it proved difficult to assess the condition of bulrush, slough sedge and cattail. The vast majority of these species have not emerged above existing water levels. Assessment of percent survivability will not be possible until water levels have dropped to lower levels during the summer months. However, some of these emergent species which have been installed outside of the inundated area north of the pond were observed. Please address the following items: i. Note mortality rates of bulrush, slough sedge and cattail located north of the pond area within Tract G. Provide vigor status and percent survivability of these species beyond the inundated pond area. ii. Conduct a site visit during the late summer when the water level in the pond area within Tract G is low. Note mortality rates of willow, bulrush, slough sedge and cattail installed in the pond area within Tract G. Provide vigor status and percent survivability of these installed species within the pond area. Recommendations: The project will be reviewed again after completion and submittal of the 1996 monitoring report. Specific recommendations concerning follow-up actions which may be required will be provided at that time. It may be necessary for some of the plant materials to be moved or for new plant materials to be installed in alternative locations. Adolfson Associates, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide continued service for the Department of Community Development. If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance on the Campus Glen project, please give me a call at 789-9658. Sincerely, 0� ($ T- T u�i� 0 Keith F. Fabing, %.a Project Biologist 9Vo,s,i 000256 5��a 4�%� Gn�t Wetla'' • Margaret Clark, City of Federal Way December 4, 1996 Page 6 Table 1. Native Growth Protection Easement. Tract G. October 11, 1995 Field Investigation Common Name Scientific Name Ouantity Live Stressed Dead Missing Total % Survived Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 42 35 0 8 0 35 83% Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 7 4 0 3 0 4 57% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 7 6 0 0 1 6 86% Willow Salix spp. 155 23 5 0 128 28 18% Red-Osier Dogwood Cornus stolonifera 61 47 8 1 5 55 90% Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis 80 46 3 6 25 49 61% Bulrush Scirpus microcarpus 73 0 0 0 73 0 0% Slough Sedge Carex obnupta 17* 6 0 0 ??? 6 ???% Cattail Typha latifolia 170 0 0 0 170 0 0% November 26, 1996 Field Investigation Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 42 29 7 7 1 36 67% Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 7 4 0 3 0 4 57% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 7 5 0 0 2 5 71% Willow Salix spp. 155 10 5 0 145 15 6% Red-Osier Dogwood Cornus stolonifera 61 46 2 0 13 48 78% Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis 80 39 4 1 36 43 54% Bulrush Scirpus microcarpus 73 24 20 0 29 44 60% Slough Sedge Carex obnupta 17* 0 0 0 ??? 0 ???% Cattail Typha latifolia 170 0 0 0 170 0 0% * Total quantity installed unknown; minimum 17 depicted on As-built;percent survival cannot be calculated.. Margaret Clark, City of Federal Way December 4, 1996 Page 7 Table 2. Native Growth Protection Easement. Tract C. October 11, 1995 Field Investigation Common Name Scientific Name Quantity Live Stressed Dead Missing Total % Survived Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 6 3 0 2 1 3 50% Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 17 7 3 5 2 10 62% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 13 12 0 0 3 12 92% Huckleberry Vaccinium spp. 4 4 0 0 0 4 100% Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis 85 0 0 0 85 0 0% November 26, 1996 Field Investigation Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 6 0 0 2 4 0 0% Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 17 8 1 4 5 9 53% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 13 12 0 0 1 12 92% Huckleberry Vaccinium spp. 4 4 0 0 0 4 100% Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis 85 0 0 0 85 0 0% Table 3. Native Growth Protection Easement. Tract E. October 11, 1995 Field Investigation Common Name Scientific Name Quantity Live Stressed Dead •Missing Total % Survived Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 14 10 1 2 2 11 79% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 15 15 0 0 0 15 100% Huckleberry Vaccinium spp. 16 10 0 2 0 10 63% Wild Rose Rosa spp. 27 26 0 0 1 26 96% November 26, 1996 Field Investigation Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 14 5 1 2 6 6 43% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 15 7 0 0 8 7 53% Huckleberry Vaccinium spp. 16 0 0 0 16 0 0% Wild Rose Rosa spp. 27 6 0 1 20 6 22% CITY OF ost _ • _ ED (206) 661-4000 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 December 23, 1996 Mr. Eric Wells, Project Superintendent Polygon Northwest Company \\°° ° 4040 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: CAMPUS GLEN SUBDIVISION WETLAND MONITORING King County File No. S89P0114—Federal Way File No.ILA-90-PPO8 Dear Mr. Wells: This letter is in response to the October 1995, submittal of the As-Built Plan for the Campus Glen Wetland Mitigation Plan. At that time we forwarded the As-Builts to Keith Fabing of Adolfson Associates, Inc., the city's wetlands consultant. Mr Fabing conducted a site inspection during which he compared the As-Builts to the original approved wetland plan(prepared 1/19/94 and revised 3/29/94) and the then existing situation on site. Mr Fabing made the following observations: 1. There were inconsistencies between the approved planting plan and the As-Built Plan in terms of number of plants installed. In general, the As-Built shows less than the approved planting plan. 2. Vigor status was not provided for installed plant materials as requested in the city's May 8, 1995, correspondence. 3. An accurate assessment could not be made of plants within the compensating storage pond in Tract G due to the high water level within this area. 4. The As-Built Report requested in the May 8, 1995, correspondence from the city to Eric Wells of Polygon was not submitted. As a result, at that time, the As-Built Plan could not be approved nor could any funds that were set aside to guarantee the wetland enhancement be released. It is now approximately one year later, and there should have been an opportunity for the wetlands to stabilize. We, therefore, again requested Keith Fabing to inspect the site. Mr. Eric Wells December 23, 1996 Page 2 The enclosed December 4, 1996, memorandum lists Mr. Fabing's observations. Please request your wetlands consultant, Terra Associates, to address all outstanding issues in said December 4, 1996, memorandum from Mr. Fabing. As you are aware, a wetland monitoring report is required to be submitted by October 31, of each year for a five year monitoring period starting in 1995 and ending in 1999. The first year monitoring report, which was due in October 1995, was never submitted, however, as requested in your January 19, 1995, correspondence, we will consider the 1996 monitoring report as the second year monitoring report. Please provide the following at your earliest convenience so that the city may determine whether your performance bond can be released at this time: 1. The second year monitoring report. This report must adhere to the standards outlined in the approved Wetland Mitigation Plan prepared January 19, 1994, and revised March 28, 1994. 2. A response to all outstanding questions or issues in the December 4, 1996, memorandum from Keith Fabing. Please also be advised that as stated in the enclosed September 5, 1996, letter from the City of Federal Way to all applicants, as of December 31, 1996, the city will no longer be paying for the review of any studies associated with environmentally sensitive areas. As allowed by Federal Way City Code(FWCC), Section 22-1243, the city will be providing these services on a cost recovery basis. This means that Polygon Northwest will be responsible for covering the cost of any review or studies undertaken by the city's wetlands consultant that may be necessary to monitor the Campus Glen wetlands. The cost of any such contract must be paid into a special account with the city's Management Services Department prior to receiving any wetland review. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 661-4111. Sincerely, Margaret H. Clark, AICP Senior Planner enc: December 4, 1996,Correspondence from Adolfson Associates,Inc. September 5, 1996,Correspondence from the City of Federal Way c: City of Federal Way Adolfson Associates.Inc. Greg Fewins,Principal Planner Keith Fabing,Project Biologist Stephen Clifton,Public Works Dev Review Mgr 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Julie Venn,Engineering Plans Reviewer Seattle,WA 98107 CMPUSGLM2ndyr.mon POLYGON n NORTHWEST COMPANY April 1, 1997 Margaret Clark City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Dear Margaret: I apologize in the delayed response to your letter dated December 23, 1996, regarding the wetland plantings at Campus Glen. Since receiving your letter, mother nature has not slowed down long enough for us to review the site. I also need to inform you of a change in our biologist. Tom Demming of Watershed Dynamics will be reviewing the site and preparing a response to Keith's comments. I believe Tom should be able to visit the site over the next week and respond to Keith's letter by the end of the month. As soon as we have a response to Keith, we should schedule a meeting to discuss conflicting issues if any arise. Hopefully, after Tom gets to the site we will be able to get this project back on track. I will be in touch over the next few weeks. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Eric H.G. Wells Vice President, Development EW:tt COMMUNITY LOENNT D BY APR 3 1997 a/I;/u/MARGLTR40J0 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201, Kirkland,Washington 98033 (206)822-7700 Fax(206)827-4098 4144111.1 ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. TASK AUTHORIZATION NO. 26-1 City City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services 33530 First Way South Federal Way, Washington 98107 Consultant Adolfson Associates, Inc. (AAI) 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Seattle, Washington 98107 Date November 25, 1996 Project Campus Glen Subdivision Project Proponent Polygon Northwest Company AAI Job Number 9625-26 Wetland Consultant Authorization Form Date November 20, 1996 Task Cost Estimates [1] Complete file review of the 14 documents cited on pages 1 and 2 of the Wetland Consultant Authorization Form. (1 @ 4 hrs. @ $53.00/hr., $212.00) [2] Complete monitoring site inspection to confirm whether existing mitigation construction is in compliance with approved revised mitigation plan. (1 @ 6 hrs. @ $53.00/hr, $318.00) [3] Provide letter of approval, approval with conditions, or list of unresolved issues. (1 @ 4 hrs. @ $53.00/hr, $212.00) RECEIVED MD EDE 4 Follow-upcommunications with project COI�MUNIIYDEVELOPMENYDEPARTMENT [ ] P � proponent consultant team and City of Federal Way NOV 26 1996 planning staff. (1 @ 0.5 hr. @ $53.00/hr, $26.50) Environmental Analysis 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW, Seattle, WA 98107 Phone(206)789-9658 Fax(206)789-9684 �� [5] Principal review. (1 @ 0.5 hr. @ 75.00/hr., $37.50) [6] Clerical support. (1 @ 0.5 hr. @ 34.00/hr., $17.00) [7] Reimbursables: $81.37 • FAX (10 pp. @ $1.20/page, $12.00). • Copies (16 pp. @ $0.12/page, $1.92). • Color Copies - 11x17 (4 pp. @ $2.00/page, $8.00). • Computer ($12.00/hr @ 3 hrs., $36.00). • Mileage (67 miles @ $0.35/mile., $23.45). Task Schedule . Review to be completed and summary letter submitted within seven working days of receipt of notification to proceed (weather permitting). Task Cost Not to exceed $904.37 without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. Deliverables [1] Mitigation plan review letter of approval, approval with conditions, or list of unresolved issues. Acceptance WCIA.'0.eel ►► CA(04.- Date t tlg Y tv City of Federal Way (Margaret Clark, Senior Planner) �� . Date November,'S`1, 1996 Adol son Associates, Inc. (Stephen Bingham, Vice President) WETLANDS CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM City: City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Consultant: Adolfson Associates, Inc. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Seattle, WA 98107 Project: Campus Glen Subdivision File No.: King County File No. S89P0114; Federal Way File No.ILA-90- PPO8 Project Proponent: Polygon Northwest Company 4040 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 (206) 822-7700 Project Planner: Margaret Clark Date: November 20, 1996 Consultant's Task Authorization No: Documents Previously Provided (with 9/28/96 Request for Wetlands As-Built Inspection): 1. 8/18/95 Contour Map. 2. 6/29/95 Fax from Julie Venn to Eric Wells (2 pages). 3. 6/14/95 Correspondence from Eric Wells to Margaret Clark (4 pages). 4. 5/8/95 Correspondence from Margaret Clark to Eric Wells (2 pages). 5. 2/22/95 (Revised 3/2/95) Correspondence from Julie Venn to Eric Wells (3 pages). 6. As-built Plans (2 pages). Additional Documents to be provided with this request: 1. 1/19/94 Wetland Mitigation Plan (Revised 3/28/94). 2. 4/19/94 Correspondence from Susan Meyer. 3. 12/6/94 Correspondence from Terra Associates, Inc. -- Wetland Mitigation Post Installation Monitoring. 4. 1/3/95 Correspondence from Susan Meyer to Margaret Clark. 5. 1/9/95 Correspondence from Margaret Clark to Eric Wells, Polygon. 6. 1/17/95 Correspondence from Susan Meyer to Margaret Clark. 7. 2/15/95 Correspondence from Eric Wells to Julie Venn. 8. 10/16/95 Memorandum from Keith Fabing to Margaret Clark on results of the As-Built Inspection. Task Scope: I have attached a chronology of correspondence and events associated with the Campus Glen wetlands. I hope that this will be helpful in this request for services. 1. Please review the list of eight documents under Additional Documents to be Provided with this Request. If you already have some of these, please let me know and I will not make duplicate copies. Since the City never responded to Polygon on their initial as-builts, they in turn never submitted the first monitoring report, which was due by October 31, 1995. In addition, even though we never accepted the plant installation as being complete and had and still have questions about the compensation pond in Tract G, we will consider the monitoring period to have started on December 1, 1994, since at that time, the plants had been installed. At this point, they need to submit a second year monitoring report, which was due by October 31, 1996. 2. Please conduct a site visit in order to update your October 16, 1995 memorandum to me. As you will notice, this information was never forwarded to Polygon. I would like us to treat your site visit (the one being requested by this form) as a follow up to the previous post-installation visit. 3. After your site visit, please prepare a memorandum addressing the following: (I) Is the As-built acceptable? If not, what needs to be done to the As-built? (ii) Have all plants been installed in accordance with the approved enhancement plan? If not, what additional plants need to be installed? (iii) What is the status of plants within the enhancement/compensation area within Tract G? If the plants are not meeting the goals of the wetland enhancement plan, do you have any recommendations? 4. Your memorandum will then be forwarded to Polygon asking them to address any deficiencies in the As-built plan or on-site wetland plantings installation. Their response can be included in their second year monitoring report which was due by October 31, 1996. 5. I am not sure how the time of year will affect either the monitoring or any plant installation. Would you please, therefore, offer recommendations on timing? Consultant's Cost Estimate: (Consultant reviews the request and estimates the cost of delivering the project as follows:) O Document review and meeting - # hours x hourly estimate. Field work - # hours x hourly estimate. ® Report/memo preparation - # hours x hourly estimate. ® Other tasks as necessary # hours x hourly estimate. ® Reimbursables (computer, fax, reproduction, mileage, photography, clerical, etc.). Task Schedule: Please respond with an estimate ASAP. I would like your site visit to occur as soon as reasonably possible. As you know, as of January 1, 1996, the City will no longer be paying for any of our wetland's consultants work associated with review of development proposals containing environmentally sensitive areas. I would, therefore, like to send Polygon a memorandum prior to the end of the year. Task Cost: Not to exceed without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. (The total task amount to be filled in by planner after the consultant returns this form with all items filled out including the total work estimate and said estimate has been approved by project planner) Acceptance: City of Federal Way (Margaret H. Clark) Date (Consultant) Date I:\CMPUSGLN\AUTHOR.PRM INTER MEMO OF F ICE To: File From: Margaret H. Clark Subject: Campus Glen Wetlands Date: November 20, 1996 Jan 19, 1994 (Revised 3/28/94) Wetland Mitigation Plan prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., submitted to City of Federal Way Apr 19, 1994 Memorandum from Susan Meyer, W&H Pacific to Margaret Clark, City of Federal Way stating that the 1/19/94 Wetland Mitigation Plan as revised 3/28/94 met the wetland mitigation requirements of the Federal Way City Code. Aug 16, 1994 Revised revegetation plan for the property line along the BPA Trail submitted By Barghausen Engineering. Oct 14, 1994 Cash Deposit in the amount of$3,840 for wetland enhancement and initial construction and consultant costs deposited with the City of Federal Way. Wetland Mitigation Planting required to be installed by Dec 1, 1994. Assignment of Funds in the amount of$6,300 deposited with Seafirst National Bank to cover a five year monitoring period. Oct 14, 1994 Cash Deposit in the amount of$3,840 for buffer plantings along the BPA Trail deposited with the City. Buffer plantings were required to be installed by Dec 1, 1994. There was a two year maintenance period for the plantings. Oct 18, 1994 Final plat of Campus Glen approved by the Federal Way City Council per Resolution No. 94-187. Oct 27, 1994 Final plat recorded with King County. • File Page 2 November 20, 1996 Dec 6, 1994 Letter from Terra Associates, Inc., stating that they had visited the site on Nov 23, 1994 to review site conditions prior to installation of the wetland and buffer plantings and also completed a post-installation inspection on Nov 29, 1994. This memorandum stated that during the site visit of Nov 23, t994, there appeared to be variation from the recommended grading shown on the planting plan within the compensating storage area. This variation required adjustment in location of the plant materials to reflect anticipated water depths. These adjustments were made in the field and plant materials installed. Terra Associates, Inc. further stated that the installed plant materials satisfy the intent of the wetland planting plan. They further stated that plant materials should be examined again in the Spring of 1995 and replacements should be made as required at that time. Jan 3, 1995 Memorandum from Susan Meyer, Wetlands Consultant with W&H Pacific to Margaret Clark, City of Federal Way stating that she conducted a site visit to inspect the wetland plantings and enhancement on Dec 28, 1994 and the following were her conclusions: 1. Two landslides within the vicinity of Lots 61 and 62 have resulted in sediment inputs into the wetland within Tract G. Clean up, restoration, and sedimentation control needs to occur. 2. Debris and trash have been dumped in the northern portion of Tract G. Clean up needs to occur. 3. The wetland enhancement area within Tract C specified plantings within the compacted soil area of the sewer easement. The enhancement plan required that the compacted soil would be overexcavated and that 12 inches of topsoil would be replaced prior to planting. Neither the overexcavation nor planting was done. 4. The southern portions of Tracts C and E were planted according to plan. 5. Plant installation within the wetland creation area within File Page 3 November 20, 1996 Tract G could not be assessed due to the depth of surface water. Susan stated that it may be necessary to revisit the site in early Spring of 1995 when emergent vegetation is growing to determine whether the planting plan was accurately installed. Jan 17, 1995 Memorandum from Susan Meyer to Margaret Clark about the discrepancy between the approved wetland enhancement plan and the grading and installation of plants within Tract G. Susan stated that she understood that the City's major concern was whether the plantings within Tract G would survive in the wetlands creation area since grades for part of the wetland area do not match those of the approved wetland enhancement plan. She again recommended that the applicant's biologist should visit the site in mid-March to conduct an early plant survival assessment. Jan 19, 1995 Correspondence from Eric Wells requesting that the maintenance period for the wetlands plantings and the tree buffer along the BPA trail start as of December 1, 1994. Jan 24, 1995 Requested that Ron Garrow, Senior Development Engineer release $2,688 out of the total $3,840 cash deposit guaranteeing the installation of the vegetation buffer along the BPA trail. One thousand, one hundred and fifty two dollars ($1,152) will be retained to cover a two-year maintenance period which runs from December 1, 1994 to December 1, 1996. Feb 2, 1995 Internal memorandum from Julie Venn to Margaret Clark stating that Julie had received a call from Eric Wells at Polygon. Eric was concerned about the abundance of water in the treed section of the Tract G wetland. Julie was going to set up an on-site visit with Eric and Garet Munger of Terra Associates„ Inc., Polygon's wetlands consultant. Eric had also mentioned to Julie that Susan Meyer was going to write a letter to Eric based on Susan's last discussion with Garret Munger. Feb 15, 1996 Letter to Julie Venn, City of Federal Way from Eric Wells, Polygon. This included a map showing grades within Tract G. Eric suggested that a possible solution to the standing water problem is to establish an outfall to the stream from the created File Page 4 November 20, 1996 wetland. However, he was concerned that this would change the ecostructure of the wetlands in this area. He requested a response from Julie by Feb 20, 1995. He stated that he would like to arrive a t a solution or revisit the site in the early Spring to check the water level. He requested a release of the cash bonds posted for the wetland planting. Feb 22, 1995 (Updated March 2, 1995) Letter from Julie Venn to Eric Wells stating that in regard to the wetland mitigation plan and wetlands planting, all pertinent documents had been referred to the City's wetlands biologist. The mitigation monies would be held until the mitigation plans are revised or revegetation has been substantiated. March 7, 1995 Memorandum from Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist, W & H Pacific to Margaret Clark, City of Federal Way. The first part of the memorandum addressed the discrepancies between the wetlands plan and the engineering plans. DOES THE GRADING WITHIN TRACT G CONFORM TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AND NOT THE APPROVED WETLANDS PLANS? IT ALSO APPEARS THAT CERTAIN GRADING DOES NOT CONFORM TO EITHER PLAN. Keith Fabing's recommendation was to resolve the differences between the engineering and wetlands plan. After this was resolved, advise Polygon that mitigation area as-built plan must comply with the approved plan to satisfy mitigation requirements. I DON'T QUITE UNDERSTAND THIS. Refer to Jan 3, 1995 memorandum from Susan Meyer to Margaret Clark. Issues 1, 2, and 3 are still outstanding. The six woodpecker nesting boxes have been installed. March 23, 1995 Memorandum from Margaret Clark to Keith Fabing stating that Keith and Margaret would be meeting with Eric Wells and Garet Munger on March 28, 1995 to discuss what should be done about the discrepancy between the approved wetland plan and the File Page 5 November 20, 1996 civil plan. It appears that the existing grading on-site conforms to the civil plans and not the approved wetland enhancement plan. This has resulted in the following: 1. Water is not ponding in the area marked with an "X" on the enclosed plan. This area was supposed to have been planted with 125 cattails. a) Were the cattails been planted in this area? Julie Venn thinks that they have not. 2. If they were planted, will they survive? If they will not survive what should be done to remedy the situation? a) Should Polygon have to regrade this area? b) Should wetland vegetation that will survive under these conditions be substituted? 3. Has the higher elevation in the area marked with an "X" resulted in more standing water in Tract G, the pre- existing uninventoried wetland? If it has, will the trees and other vegetation in this area survive? Margaret requested a recommendation from Keith if the answer was that the plants will not survive. The goal is that adequate mitigation in terms of wetland enhancement must be provided for the crossing of the wetland by S. 330th Place. The memorandum further stated that if mitigation for the crossing could be accomplished by the existing situation, and the intent of the wetland mitigation plan has been met, the City will release the proportionate amount of the wetland performance bond. This is assuming that all plants as called for on the mitigation plan have been installed. On the other hand, if either the new plants or the existing plants will not survive, Polygon must modify the planting and regrade if necessary to meet the intent of the wetland mitigation plan. April 14, 1995 Memorandum from Keith Fabing to Margaret Clark. This was a follow-up to the March 28, 1995 with Keith, Margaret, Eric Wells and Garret Munger. High points of the memorandum were File Page 6 November 20, 1996 the following: 1. The approved planting plan was modified to conform to the approved engineering plan. In addition, an area of fill located northeast of the compensating storage pond does not conform to the design contours on the engineering plans. 2. As-built drawings were not available to confirm whether the plantings were installed in conformance with the approved wetland plan or to assess as-built contour discrepancies. 3. The City had concerns that prolonged inundation of black cottonwood and red alder may result in increased tree mortality. It is the position of Eric Wells and Garret Munger that installation of the Tract G compensating pond and the Tract K detention pond have not affected hydrologic characteristics within Tract G. It is their opinion that any observed increase in inundation in this area is a result of increased hydrograph fluctuations in the adjacent stream, which is likely the result of upstream impervious surface development outside of Campus Glen. 4. It was recommended that a review of the available hydrologic data for the adjacent stream be completed by the City of Federal Way to assess if a correlation exists between recent on-site development by Campus Glen and the duration of inundation within the NGPE resulting from stream in-flow 5. It was also recommended that observations of inundation levels within the NGPE (Tract G) be included in all mitigation monitoring field investigations and monitoring report submittals. May 8, 1995 Letter from Margaret Clark, City of Federal Way to Eric Wells, Polygon outlining the following: 1. By June 15, 1995, the City requested that an as-built plan be submitted. The As-built plan must File Page 7 November 20, 1996 a) List and depict all installed plantings by species. b) Specify existing vigor status (live, stressed, or dead). c) Provide a post-construction topographic survey completed to a one-foot contour resolution. 2. An As-built report must accompany the As-built plan. 3. If the plant conditions in this report are acceptable in terms of plant vigor and survivability, 70 percent of the cost of nursery plantings ($1,848) plus $1,200 retained for construction inspection and consultation by your wetland biologist would be released for a total of$3,048. The remaining $792 would be retained by the City throughout the five-year monitoring period to cover plant replacement. 4. The first monitoring report as specified in the October 1994 "Agreement to Monitor Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan" must be submitted to the City by October 31, 1995 with subsequent reports being submitted within 12 months of the prior report. 5. Prior to any wetland funds being released, the following must also be completed to the satisfaction of the City: a) Regrade and stabilize Lots 61 and 62 and remove any slide material from the wetland and buffer in Tract G. Slides in these areas resulted in sediment being deposited within the wetland and wetland buffer in Tract G. Please submit a plan to Ron Garrow, Senior Development Engineer, for review and approval prior to commencing work. b) Remove all debris and trash from all on-site wetlands and their buffers. June 14, 1995 Letter from Eric Wells of Polygon to Margaret Clark stating that with that correspondence he was submitting two copies of the as- built plan with the Dec 6, 1994 planting report by Terra Associates. He further stated that the most valuable information File Page 8 November 20, 1996 would result from the October 1995 monitoring report. At that time, the condition of plantings could be accurately assessed and corrective measures taken. He further stated that the post construction topography survey appeared to be a new condition and costly endeavor. In relationship to stabilization of the slopes on Lots 61 and 62, he would be contacting Ron Garrow and it was his intent to begin operation in the first half of July 1995. He stated that he would update the City in July on the progress of the slope stabilization and at that time request a release of funds of the nursery plantings. This letter was also accompanied by a June 14, 1995 memorandum from Garet Munger of Terra Associates, Inc. Mr Munger stated that he had visited the site on Feb 8 and March 28, 1995. They did not conduct a systematic count or evaluation of the plantings but did observe the general condition of the plantings. His June 14, 1995 memorandum further stated that at the time of inspections, the materials were viable and buds showed evidence of new spring growth. Sept 28, 1995 Margaret Clark forwarded the As-builts with accompanying correspondence and documents to Keith Fabing for him to do an As-built inspection to determine whether the wetlands planting had been installed accordance to approved plans. Oct 16, 1995 Memorandum from Keith Fabing to Margaret Clark discussing whether plant materials have been installed in substantial compliance with the approved planting plan. His comments were also based on the May 8, 1995 letter from Margaret Clark to Eric Wells. The following summarizes the content of the memorandum: 1. There are inconsistencies between the approved planting plan and As-built plan in terms of number of plants installed. In general, the As-built shows less than the approved planting plan. 2. Vigor status was not provided for installed plant materials. 3. A post-construction topographic survey was provided as File Page 9 November 20, 1996 requested. 4. Lots 61 and 62 were regraded and stabilized and slide material removed from Tract G. 5. All debris and trash were removed from on-site wetlands and buffers. Keith's comment was that the status of trash and debris in all NGPE's and the detention pond must be addressed in the yearly monitoring report. 6. Due to the high water level within the compensating storage pond in Tract G, an accurate assessment could not be made of plants within this area. Keith stated that the project would be reviewed again after completion and submittal of the October 1995 monitoring report. Specific recommendations concerning follow-up actions which may be required would have been provided at that time. He further stated that it may be necessary for some of the plant materials to be moved or for new plant materials to be installed in different locations. THIS INFORMATION WAS NEVER FORWARDED TO POLYGON. Nov 20, 1996 Authorization form to be faxed to Keith with a request to do a follow-up inspection of the plantings to determine changes since prior site visit. I:\cmpusgln\wetlands.sts RECEIVED BY N , (na/ CITY OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTME ED - ItUN 2 4 1997 (253)661-4000 Filr), 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 June 23, 1997 Thomas Miller, Construction Manager Polygon Northwest Company 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 Re: Campus Glen Subdivision; Maintenance Bond Release Federal Way File No. JLA90-PPO8 Dear Mr. Miller: An inspection of the site has been performed and all noted defects (with the exception of the bioswale and dying plants within the wetland area) have been corrected to the City's satisfaction. The bioswale has only recently been seeded and will require observation to ensure that the seed grows adequately and is maintained through the summer months. Additionally, it appears that many of the plant materials e.g., cedar trees, within the wetland area are dead or dying. As such, the City agrees to the following to ensure completion of the project: 1. Bond 94-1012 - The City will retain $5000.00 of the remaining $10,573.00 administrative cash deposit through the fall of 1997. A check, payable to Polygon Northwest Company will be mailed to you within one month in the amount of$5,573.00. Successful functioning of the bioswale this fall will result in the full release of the remaining $5,000.00. 2.' Bonds 94-1021 and 1022 - Please work with the Department of Community Development, specifically Margaret Clark, Senior Planner, to address replacement of dead or dying plants and wetland monitoring related to these bonds. In addition to the above, the following is an update on the status of existing Federal Way bonds on file with the City: 1. Bond-1012 -in the amount of$1,409,760.00 was fully released in 1994. At such time, A 2-year maintenance bond (No. 94-1019) was posted with the City. 2. Bond 94-1019 - in the amount of$422,928 is hereby fully released (see enclosed Full Release of Maintenance Bond Notice). 3. Bond 94-1025 - in the amount of$1,788.00 is hereby fully released (see enclosed Full Release of Assignment Notice). The administrative cash deposit associated With this bond, in the amount of$100.00, will also be released for a total of$1,888.00. A check for this amount will be sent to you within one month. With the issuance of this letter, the City formally assumes all future maintenance of public roads associated with this development. Once the vegetation within the bioswale has been established and the bioswale is functioning efficiently, the City will also assume maintenance of public storm drainage facilities associated with this development. Please forward copies of the attached release notices to the pertinent institutions to complete the assignment and bond release process. We appreciate your cooperation in the completion of this development. If you have any questions please contact our office at 661-4109. Sincerely, Stephen Clifton, AI P • Development Services Manager c: Jim Pryal, Construction Inspector. Gary Barnett, Senior Development Engineer Gary Kennison, SWM Maintenance Supervisor Pat Foster, Streets Maintenance Supervisor Kevin Peterson, Engineering Technician Margaret Clark, Senior Planner Project File Day File L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENT\ILA90 PP.08\MAINTREL.LET CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM January 22, 1997 TO: Stephen Clifton, AICP, Development Services Manager FROM: Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of Campus Glen -- Interlocal Agreement "A" list Item, King County File No. S89P0114, Federal Way File No.ILA-90-PPO8 -- Release of Remaining Cash Deposit Polygon originally set aside $3,840 with the City to guarantee replacement and maintenance of a vegetative buffer along the BPA easement. As you recall, these trees were removed by Polygon as a result of a request by the Bonneville Power Administration. Polygon installed the trees in accordance with an approved plan, and on January 24, 1995 or soon thereafter, the City released $2,688 (70%), retaining $1,152 for a two-year maintenance period. This maintenance period started on December 1, 1994 and ended on December 1, 1996. You and I recently inspected the site and determined that the maintenance bond could be released. Please release the remaining cash deposit in the amount of$1,152 to Polygon Northwest at the following address: Polygon Northwest Company 4040 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 Attention: Mr. Eric Wells, Project Superintendent Thank you. CMPUS GLN\BUFERBND.REM 1 POLYGON'^ NORTHWEST CO,v.PANY RECEIVED BY ',�JMM(JNITY nFVEi nPMFNT DEPARTMENT March 8th 2000 MAR 9 2000 Greg Fewins Principal Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Campus Glen Wetland Mitigation Dear Greg: We are writing to you in regards to the Campus Glen Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring. We have been working on this project since 1995. In that time we have worked with three different City representatives and two City wetland consultants. This has created inconsistency in the review of this project. Since population of the subdivision we have experienced several instances of theft of mitigation plantings. We have planted some areas three times and each time the plants have gone missing. (These are usually Douglas Fir and Cedar). Our on-site construction staff, project coordinator and myself have all personally verified planting completion only to have them removed. Although we have not had 100% success with areas in which plants have gone missing, the overall mitigation has been successful. We have gone over and above the required mitigation by voluntarily providing fencing and signage to deter residents from entering or dumping in the wetland area. Our experience with this mitigation project has lead us to believe that success as defined by the initial wetland report is not physically possible at this site. We have spent approximately $4000 on consultants and more than $7500 on planting, fencing and signage in the last three years, almost double the amount of the set aside. We have exhausted our budget for this project. However, we are willing to provide the City with a check for$3,000 to be used towards a successful mitigation site. With your agreement to this payment we are requesting a full release of our outstanding wetland mitigation set-asides for this project. 11624 S.E.5th Street,Suite 200, Bellevue,Washington 98005 (425)586-7700 Fax(425)688-0500 /cum iezapad Jo Apia i1mii1tIQ 3!m1JAI ISO/MR.10M 1102Xiod uoNSnENOIN uziooi IA1 :OD suogendp ivapisaJd aa!A siiarn aug `Xia.zaauts -Jamul su!i!ui suopsanb iiue anti noX molls ow!Ito 01 aaij iaaj asuaid [St69 ON 121/LL] 90:LT NOW 96/9T/TT eapi pool a aq pinoM vernal*ay moii lannq ay Suileredas aouaj B ley uolgSnuNoyq uijoaieiN glint aade am •A Mppo1 atp of luaaefpe iajjnq pueidn ay utqu#ianoa lueid jo 4isuap 9SB01311i 01 saioads aail pue gnnis£iolsiapun Supsrxa aql luauiaiddns of sum anti uoilBSi;iui Jo luau!! au, (uoiie2-0 siuuld uiaj pioms 01. (uoIB2-J) sump£uagMous SI :Base luatuasra ay u!palielsur aq 2u!Moiio3 aql 'auii camas ay jo dol uo iios paloEdmoo aqa Suuedaid,Siiadoid of uoruppe ut Ivy puauttuooai ant (uoijj2-I) slugid adult uoSaio g (uojeS-i) slueld ivies Z i (uoiie2-s) sits s8'SnoQ 9 :luatuasea aura 1 AS aql jo a2pa udalsaM aqi pug airuan.us anzgeaq ay uaailaq amid,gt££ glnos of iaiieigd ssai 10 aiotu paiiglsui aq SuiMoiio;ay lgtp puaunuooat ant 'ainlaruls anrgaaq aql of ssaao8 apinoid of Bare punoietuna ianei2 r uiglurcw of paau ou si way asnBaag •XrMpeoi aql of luaos[pu lajjnq pue'dn ay unpim ianoo lurid Jo iusuap aql aseaioui o;sa!oads aall puu gtugs L1ols.iapun Supsrxa ay ivatuaiddns of sum aiaq uoileBn!tu;o luau!! au, D fae is •3 pue 3 siaeIL u!s2upueid Mau aql ut iie3 Aisea pue 'iautums 'Suuds ale'aril Suunp uopu u!puaurutooaz Spuoils ant `s'eualetu lurid ieuouippr atp of uomppe uY -sgase uopu2glw ua'rD snduieD ay IN suonepuauiuzooaa Suuurid i(W air $u!MoiioJ ati i, :atuu N suo!4opuewwooaJ uoiloemw ue j sndwoo :3d •oui 'se4oioossy uosiiopd 'e wez e!zzn :woi3 AoM I0JOpe3 4o A4!3 epulw :Oj 966 L JeguuanoN 9 L :e4.oa i896-68L (90Z) :y 8596-68L (90Z) :Hd L0186 uol2utys1M `01111328 j anuanv aloyslnis 60£S •auI `samaossy uosMjopd ‘1414rt • TO 39Vd OSSti NOSJ1000+ 039663L90Z b0:LT 366Ti•9T/T"i' [St69 ON X2I/XI] 90:LT NOW 96/9T/TT 8996-68L (90Z) 40 •ouI 'se4oloossd uos;Iopy !PO esoeid situ to uotssIwsuoi4 eq4 uj sJo»e away\ e1e41.Jo 'se od no en1e0e.1 IOU op noA L1 •nno��o� o� Adoo pioH :NON saxEis pooEuouoo Xoe[q anti Si SWIM Moii!M anti OZ slusid Auagiapia pal uoiiES-i Oi slueid pooredop latso-pai uoiieS-i 0 i :siiao uotlualap 1aleMuuois oral atp;o iaup alp Jo tuouoq atp ut pump aq 2uinnoiio3 atp retie puatuutoaai am -laafoid atp jo ajti atp ui le;snip tua[gold E uaaq seti rip sugap pus gsEn alp jo luatuaoe[d aSElnaostp AEur pug suoisenut pawn%apnioxa diag quM Ewe atp 2upelaSanag Tam.Aq papuaunuooal sera se `uotlslaSan lnotpin% uretuai of eon alp BupMons puatutuooal lou op am •suonipuoo ctp atp aninlns of am axe legs shield glue+pawEid aq s8a1e oMl atp;o iaup aqp `stuaaq pusidn atp uo Supwnuaouoo pug SHOD oral alp jo laup alp SupouSi to `loe.n slip ut Suipsi2-ai Aue 2ugsptut jo pealsut igtp puaururooal am -lam Imp iCpeau lou si iatpo atp pue `sraofim pue `pooMuoUoo `losgp.rcq uoddns of gSnoua lam rClleotiCi st iiao auo Aiuo `saioads lurid puspara aleStigo uoddns of pasoddns alOM tpoq gSnogliy -srpo aSelms 12lEMMULto3s paleneoxa oMT S11'E1u03 A[ltlauil3 13Ell sIu1, •Aliunururoo puepat reinleu e otuntu of lanoo antlelaSan;o ivatugsgigelsa alela[aooe of s2upuejd apinold of pue 3 viols laleh+uuols Aloiesuadtuoo ap!nold of sera raze site ut uot_ r2p!tu;o lualui ail, 9 Jwsts (uoiie2-0 shield ivies 01 (uo11e2-0 slusid ura;Rums 01 (uoiir$-i) slueid AuagMous Si (uofeS-Z) swan 11;Snoci S (uofr8-Z) swan aidetu;Eai-Srq S nii mapis atp pue aSpa puepaM atp uaartuaq ease aril ui palueid aq SuiMoiio;atp laid`aoua;a Suiiielsui of uouippe ui `puaurulooal am Z0 39tid OSSt7 NOSd10Qti 039663L90Z b0:LT 366T/9T/TT POLYGON% NORTHWEST CCJMPANY June 9, 2000 Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33530— lst Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003-6210 RE: Campus Glen Dear Minnie: We are writing in response to your recent letter regarding the Campus Glen wetland mitigation. The 1999 wetland monitoring report was not submitted to the City due to the fact that a portion of the mitigation had failed as outlined in the memo from Watershed Dynamics dated June 24, 1999 and sent to you on July 12, 1999. We will submit full monitoring report to you on this project by July 7th. We will then take remedial actions as determined necessary after City review. Upon completion of any additional planting, we will submit verification of completion of said work. Please feel free to call me or Malcolm McNaughton should you have any questions or concerns in this matter. Sincerely, •{2-e-i-ed Eric Wells 60 Vice President of Operations cc: Malcolm McNaughton Polygon Northwest nhF�k� nfiT F�' IVED 13Y Larry Burnstad Watershed Dynamics bAp,m7N 11624 S.E. 5th Street,Suite 200, Bellevue,Washington 98005 (425)586-7700 Fax(425)688-0500 10/09/1990 14:31 2067899684 ADOLFSON ASSC PAGE 01 Adolfson Associates, Inc. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Seattle, Washington 98107 PH: (206) 789-9658 FX: (206) 789-9684 adolfson@adolfson.com October 9, 1998 (page 1 of 2) To: Minnie Dhaliwal, City of Federal Way; Fax: (253) 661-4129 From: Diane Hennessey, Adolfson Associates, Inc. RE: Authorization for meeting with Campus Glen residential development applicant in regards to plantings in wetland mitigation areas. The following City of Federal Authorization Form provides the estimated cost for attending a meeting with the Campus Glen applicant to discuss plantings and plans for the final year of monitoring. Please note that the total estimated cost will be $340 including $285 direct expenses plus $55 reimbursables (mileage, photography, etc.), or the cost of time and materials, whichever is less. The meeting will be scheduled once we receive and sign the authorization form. Note: No hard copy will be sent. If you do not receive all pages, or there were errors in the transmission of this facsimile, please call Adolfson Associates, Inc. at (206) 789-9658 10/09/98 FRI 14:33 (TX/RX NO 6350] POLYGON n NORTHWEST C uMPANY RECECOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D T DEPARTMEN T MAY .1 0 2004 May 7,2004 ,tr 2: I n,-) Jane Gamble, Associate Planner Community Development Services Department P. O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Subject: Campus Glen Dear Ms. Gamble: During the Inspection of Campus Glen wetlands, you requested that we supply the enclosed information for your files. As discussed, Rivers Edge Services, Inc. will monitor and water the new plantings through the summer of 2004 to assist plant establishment Hopefully this will satisfy the requirements of the City of Federal Way and we can finally release the outstanding bond. If there is anything else that you need, please do not hesitate to contact me at 425.766.9473. Respe,etfully, 7Joanne Haia Polygon Northwest cc: Ron Miller, Polygon Northwest Enclosures (8) 11624 SE 5th Street,Suite 200, Bellevue,WA 98005 (425)586-7700 FAX(425) 688-0500 CITY OF • \)vPir) CITY HALL 33530 1st Way South (253) 661-4000 PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 September 6, 2000 Mr. Eric Wells Polygon Northwest Company FILE 11624 SE 5th Street, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98005 Re: File #90-100813-000-00-UP CAMPUS GLEN WETLAND MONITORING Dear Mr. Wells: This letter is to confirm that the City is in receipt of the July 3, 2000, Mitigation Monitoring Report prepared by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. for the Campus Glen Residential Development. Our review of the report supports the conclusion that specific remediation measures must be taken in order to satisfy the conditions of the approved wetland-monitoring program. The City requires that those plantings recommended in the report prepared by Watershed Dynamics, Inc. be installed in the late autumn months of this year. Furthermore, temporary irrigation for the plantings will be necessary through the spring, summer, and autumn months of 2001, in order to ensure long-term survival of the required species. In addition to the installation of the recommended plantings noted in the July 3, 2000 report, please verify the successful implementation of the planting recommendations from the November 16, 1998, Adolfson Associates, Inc. (enclosed). Those 1998 plantings that have not survived, or which are otherwise absent from the specified tracts, should be replaced at the time of the installation of the recommended plantings outlined in the July 3, 2000, monitoring report. Below is a summary of plantings by tract and per recommendation. In order for the City to deem the wetland mitigation for Campus Glen complete and the intent of the wetland mitigation plan met, all of the plantings sited in these reports must be in place and in good health at the time of final inspection. Mr. Eric Wells Page 2 September 6, 2000 RECOMMENDED CAMPUS GLEN WETLAND MITIGATION PLANTINGS Tract Adolfson Associates, Inc Watershed Dynamics, Inc # November 16, 1998 July 3, 2000 C 6 Douglas Firs (5-gal) • 4 red flowering currants (2-gal) 12- alal plants (1-gal) • 6 snowberry plants (2-gal) ttieji 8 Ogon grape (1-gal) • 8 bald hip rose (2-gal) • 15 snowberry plants (1-gal) • 8 Tall Oregon grape ((2-gal) • 10 sword ferns (1-gal) • 8 big leaf maple (5-gal) • 4 western hemlock (5-gal) E • 5 big leaf maple (2-gal) • 5 Doug firs (6-8 feet) • 5 Doug fir trees (2-gal) • 15 snowberry (1-gal) • 10 sword ferns (1-gal) • 10 salal plants (1-gal) G • 10 red-osier dogwood (1-gal) No recommendation • 10 red elderberry (1-gal) • 20 live willow stakes • 15 live black cottonwood stakes Please contact the City for a final inspection of the required plantings. We would appreciate the opportunity to meet on site with the wetland biologist responsible for the July 2000, report at the time of this final inspection. Upon satisfying these conditions, and with a written agreement on the part of Polygon Northwest Company to provide irrigation for the new plantings through the spring, summer, and autumn of 2001, the City will release the wetland mitigation assignment of funds for the Campus Glen wetland monitoring. If you have any questions, please call me at 253-661-4120. Sincerely, 6414421-e— Jane Gamble Planning Technician enc: Adolfson Associates Letter, November 16, 2000 Doc.I.D.11595 11/16/1998 17:04 206789q"4 ADOLFSON ASSC PAGE 4216M Adolfson Associates, Inc. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Seattle, Washington 98107 PH: (206) 789-9658 FX: (206) 789-9684 Date: 16 November 1998 To: Minnie Daliwhal, City of Federal Way From: Lizzie Zemke, Adolfson Associates, Inc. RE: Campus Glen mitigation recommendations Minnie: The following are my planting recommendations for the Campus Glen mitigation areas. In addition to the additional plant materials, we strongly recommend irrigation during the late spring, summer, and early fall in the new plantings in Tracts C and E. Tract C The intent of mitigation here was to supplement the existing understory shrub and tree species to increase the density of plant cover within the upland buffer adjacent to the roadway. Because there is no need to maintain a gravel turnaround area to provide access to the beehive structure, we recommend that the following be installed more or less parallel to South 331'Place between the beehive structure and the western edge of the sewer line easement: 6 Douglas firs (5-gallon) 12 salal plants (1-gallon) 8 Oregon grape plants (1-gallon) We recommend that in addition to properly preparing the compacted soil on top of the sewer line, the following be installed in the easement area: 15 snowberry plants (1-gallon) 10 sword fern plants (1-gallon) Tract E The intent of mitigation here was to supplement the existing understory shrub and tree species to increase density of plant cover within the upland buffer adjacent to the roadway. We agree with Malcolm McNaughton that a fence separating the buffer from the sidewalk would be a good idea. 11/16/98 MON 17:06 [TX/RI NO 6945] 11/16/1998 17:04 206789°c84 ADOLFSON ASSC PAGE We recommend, in addition to installing a fence, that the following be planted in the area between the wetland edge and the sidewalk: 5 big-leaf maple trees (2-gallon) 5 Doug fir trees (2-gallon) 15 snowberry plants (1-gallon) 10 sword fern plants (1-gallon) 10 salal plants (1-gallon) Tract G The intent of mitigation in this area was to provide compensatory stormwater storage and to provide plantings to accelerate establishment of vegetative cover to mimic a natural wetland community. This tract currently contains two excavated stormwater storage cells. Although both were supposed to support obligate wetland plant species, only one cell is typically wet enough to support hardhack, cottonwood, and willows, and the other is not nearly that wet. We recommend that instead of initiating any re-grading in this tract, or ignoring the drier of the two cells and concentrating on the upland berms, the drier of the two areas be planted with plants that are able to survive the dry conditions. We do not recommend allowing the area to remain without vegetation, as was recommended by WDI. Revegetating the area will help exclude weed invasions and may discourage placement of the trash and debris that has been a problem thus far in the life of the project. We recommend that the following be planted in the bottom of the drier of the two stormwater detention cells: 10 1-gallon red-osier dogwood plants 10 1-gallon red elderberry plants 20 live willow stakes 15 live black cottonwood stakes Note: Hard copy to follow. If you do not receive ail pages, or there were errors in the transmission of this facsimile, please call Adolfson Associates, Inc. at (206) 789-9658 11/16/98 MON 17:06 [TX/RI NO 6945] MEMORANDUM .4.404/a ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. TO: Margaret Clark, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist, Adolfson Associates, Inc. RECEIVED DATE: October 16, 1995 OCT 1 9 1995 RE: Campus Glen Planting Plan As-Built Inspection(File No. ILA-90-PP08) CITY Or FEAL WAY BUILDING DEPT, JOB NO.: 9595-26 The purpose of this memo is to determine whether plant materials have been installed in substantial compliance with the approved mitigation plan sheets titled Wetland Planting Plan: Compensating Storage Pond, Tract G, Campus Glen, Federal Way, Washington (hereafter referred to as "Tract G"), and Buffer Enhancement Plan: NGPE Tracts C and E, Campus Glen, Federal Way, Washington (hereafter individually refereed to as "Tract C" and "Tract E"). The plans were prepared for Polygon Northwest Company by Terra Associates, Inc. dated January 19, 1994 (revised March 29, 1994). A field inspection was completed on October 11, 1995. Tables 1, 2, and 3 summarize the quantity of plant materials identified in the plant schedule, growth status, total plants identified in the field, and percent survivability of individual species of installed plant materials. These comments are based on a review of the revised plan that addresses comments submitted in a letter on May 8, 1995 to Eric Wells of Polygon Northwest Company from Margaret Clark of the City of Federal Way. The following is a list of the information requested in the May 1995 letter(described in bold), a summary of how each item was'addressed in the revised mitigation plan(described in normal type), and items which require further action (described in italics). Additional analysis and comments are provided in the following section. 1. List and depict all installed plantings by species. The following is a list of inconsistencies between the planting plan as-built and the plant schedule in Tract G. a. The planting plan as-built depicts 155 willow slips. The plant schedule indicates 170 willow slips. Environmental Analysis 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW, Seattle, WA 98107 Phone(206)789-9658 Fax(206)789-9684 tof Margaret Clark,City of Federal W ay October 16, 1995 Page 2 b. The planting plan as-built depicts 81 salmonberry plantings. The plant schedule indicates 80 salmonberry plantings. c. Eight installed salmonberry plantings were discovered in an area depicted on the planting plan as-built as a circle located in northeast corner of Tract G. This circle should call out "8 Salmonberry." d. The planting plan as-built depicts 33 bulrush plantings. The plant schedule indicates 170 bulrush plantings. e. The planting plan as-built depicts four areas where slough sedge was to be installed. Only two of these areas depicts the quantities installed. The following is a list of inconsistencies between the planting plan as-built and the plant schedule in Tract C. f. The planting plan as-built depicts installation of 14 unknown plant materials identified with a circled "d" symbol. This symbol is not called out in the plant schedule. g. The planting plan as-built depicts 17 Douglas-fir. The plant schedule indicates 16 Douglas-fir. h. The planting plan as-built depicts 13 vine maple. The plant schedule indicates 15 vine maple. i. The planting plan as-built depicts 4 huckleberry. The plant schedule indicates 12 huckleberry. The following item identifies an inconsistency between the planting plan as-built and the plant schedule in Tract E. j. The planting plan as-built depicts 14 Douglas-fir. The plant schedule indicates 16 Douglas-fir. Fifteen Douglas-fir were identified during the as-built inspection. Please correct the discrepancies between the planting plan as-built and the plant schedule in the October monitoring report submittal. Adjust the plant schedule to reflect the planting plan. Provide quantities for slough sedge in all planting areas. Identify the unknown plant material in Tract C. 2. Specify existing vigor status (live, stressed, or dead). Vigor status was not provided for installed plant materials. • Margaret Clark,City of Federal Way October 16, 1995 Page 3 Please provide vigor status for all plant materials in the October monitoring report submittal. 3. Provide a post-construction topographic survey completed to a one-foot contour resolution. A post-construction topographic survey was provided as requested. No further action is required 4. Regrade and stabilize Lots 61 and 62 and remove any slide material from the wetland and buffer in Tract G. I understand that this work has been completed and addressed by the Public Works Department. No further action is required 5. Remove all debris and trash from all on-site wetlands and their buffers. No trash or debris was observed within on-site wetlands, wetland buffers, or within the Compensating Storage Pond in Tract G. Continue to monitor for the presence of debris and trash within on-site wetlands, wetland buffers, or within the Compensating Storage Pond in Tract G. Maintain an active and ongoing maintenance program addressing this issue. Please report the status of trash and debris in all monitoring report submittals. Additional Comments 1. The planting plan calls out "Bulrush" as "Scirpus macrocarpus." The correct species name for this bulrush species is "macrocarpus." Please correct this species name for bulrush in the October monitoring report submittal. 2. Due to the observed high water level within the compensating storage pond within Tract G, it proved difficult to assess the condition of bulrush, slough sedge and cattail. The vast majority of these species have not emerged above existing water levels. Assessment of percent survivability will not be possible until water levels have dropped to lower levels during the summer months. However, some of these emergent species have been installed outside of the inundated area north of the pond. Margaret Clark,City of Federal Way October 16, 1995 Page 4 Note mortality rates of bulrush, slough sedge and cattail located north of the pond area and provide percent survivability of these species beyond the inundated pond area. Table 1. Native Growth Protection Easement. Tract G Common Name Scientific Name Quantity Live Stressed Dead Missing Total %Survived Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 42 35 0 8 0 43 83% Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 7 4 0 3 0 7 57% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 7 6 0 0 1 6 86% Willow Salix spp. 170 23 5 0 142 28 16% Red-Osier Dogwood Corpus stolonifera 61 47 8 1 5 55 90% Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis 80 46 3 6 25 49 61% Bulrush Scirpus microcarpus 120 0 0 0 120 0 0% Slough Sedge Carex obnupta 85 6 0 0 79 6 7% Cattail Typha latifolia 170 0 0 0 170 0 0% Table 2. Native Growth Protection Easement. Tract C Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 6 3 0 2 1 3 50% Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 16 7 3 4 2 10 62% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 15 12 0 0 3 6 80% Huckleberry Vaccinium spp. 12 4 0 0 8 4 33% Table 3. Native Growth Protection Easement. Tract E Douglas-Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 16 10 1 2 2 11 69% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 15 15 0 0 0 15 100% Huckleberry Vaccinium spp. 12 10 0 2 0 10 83% Wild Rose Rosa spp. 27 26 0 0 1 26 96% Recommendations: The project will be reviewed again after completion and submittal of the October monitoring report. Specific recommendations concerning follow-up actions which may be required will be provided at that time. It may be necessary for some of the plant materials to be moved or for new plant materials to be installed in different locations. If you have any questions of if I can be of further assistance, call me at 789-9658. PACIFIC OMMURECEIVED O 3025-112th Avenue N.E. P.O.Box C-97304 JAN 5 1995 Bellevue, WA WA 98009-9304 MEMORANDUM TO: Margaret Clark, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Susan Meyer, Wetland Ecologist, W&H Pacific ? DATE: January 3, 1995 RE: Campus Glen Wetland and Buffer Enhancement Inspection Job No: 3-0420-0601 This memo provides comments resulting from a field inspection of the wetland and wetland setback enhancement plan implementation. A site visit was conducted on December 28, 1994. The attached map shows tracts and lots referred to in the comments. • Two significant landslides have occurred presumably within the last week in the vicinity of lots 61 and 62. The slides resulted in sediment inputs to the on-site wetland within Tract G. The slides should be regraded and sediment removed from the wetland and its setback. Once the slope has been regraded, erosion control matting should be installed to ensure that this steep slope does not fail again. It may also be desirable to plant or seed red alder to provide a more solid root structure for long term erosion slope stability. • Debris and trash have been dumped into the northern portion of Tract G where the culvert under the road outflows. All debris and trash should be removed from the wetland and its setback area. • The wetland setback enhancement plan within Tract C specified plantings within the compacted soil area of the sewer easement (resembles a road). The plan specified that the compacted soil would be over-excavated and 12 inches of topsoil would be replaced prior to planting. This was not done. No plantings were installed within the compacted soil area of the easement. The plan should be carried out as presented and approved by the City. Currently, the easement provides opportunity for dumping of yard waste and debris into the wetland. '• (206)827-0220 Fax(206)822-5341 Planning•Engineering•Surveying•Landscape Design•Environmental Services • PACIFIC Margaret Clark January 3, 1995 Page 2 • Plant installation within the wetland creation area could not be adeouately assessed due to the depth of surface water. It may be necessary to revisit the site in the early spring when emergent vegetation is growing to determine whether the planting plan was accurately installed. • The southern portion of Tract C and Tract E were planted according to the enhancement plan. • The clearing of part of Tract D for the roadway that you had pointed out on the map was not included in the enhancement plan and was, therefore, not planted. This area was compensated for in the wetland creation portion of the plan. Recommendation The 70 percent bond release should not occur until the sewer easement has been over-excavated, replaced with topsoil, and planted. Bond release should also not occur until the failed slope in the vicinity of lots 61 and 62 is regraded and stabilized with erosion control matting at a minimum. 3-0420-0601\CampGlen.Ins cxrv•F G• PUBLIC WORKS EiCiEr<FilL MEMORANDUM \IN) Fil)P TO: Margaret Clark FROM: Ron Garrow For Your Information Date: January 6, 1995 SUBJECT: Campus Glen As-built Review - KCS89P0114 During the as-built review a site inspection was conducted by the plan reviewer for the project. A concern has arisen with regard to the wetland Tract G. The area as it exists today and as graded according to the engineering plans is as follows. A Class II stream which runs in a southwesterly direction along the easterly side of Tract K- storm pond and designated Tract G - wetland/flood plain. Tract K- storm ponds lying south of Lots 68-73 and west of Tract G, drain westerly and southerly into a 160-ft biofiltration swale, which then drains into the Class II stream/wetland area. The NGPE/wetland area - Tract G, lies between the bioswale on the west and the Class II stream on the east. A compensatory wetland area was created within this NGPE because of the encroachment of the storm ponds - Tract K. This was accomplished by over-excavation of a kidney shaped low area. The remaining area north and east of the over-excavation was not to be disturbed. The enhancement area (the over-excavated low area and cleared area) as shown on the wetland/landscaping plan was to extend northeasterly to the southerly limits of Tract K - storm ponds. Restoration of the wetland vegetation was to be done according to the wetland/landscaping plans. These plans also called out the bottom elevation for the entire revegetated area to match the existing wetland to the west. It appears that some materials were left on-site during the construction of the floodplain compensating storage area. These materials formed a small berm along the northeast and southeast perimeters of the storage area resulting in some ponding. The area to the northeast adjacent to the detention ponds (Tract K) was cleared and graded uniformly. However, the grades for this area do not conform to the wetland/landscaping plan. The grades are higher than the wetland area to the west and the kidney shaped compensation area to the southwest. Consequently, water does not pond here. Since cattails were planted in this cleared high area, it is questionable if the plants will survive and further investigation into this matter by the wetland biologist is suggested. Any modification to the existing conditions will need to be shown on the as-built plans. GITY Qr-- R-1 .7 33¢g0 l$T WAY 90 LJTN - FH OG FiA L.WAY. WA 814 114C lres 96003 Mnyoe Council moors Merry Ls. Oaess lSta - R GlVntz City Mansgor Manton 'Skf - Presre Kcnneels 6'_ lYybarg Rob re Stsad Ray T erat[erroea PA.( WoAHes r F.A.X TRANSrv1ITZ'AL TeriErvic zANZYUM -r(:3• sa rca►.s- 2dr.J. _.. Fr sue-- 151 NVMBHR OF PAc aas (Including Mom° Shect): 00 . i I A20M: HcA..r-+jca.-N•a►' • C_Qsae� - OFFTCS OF: �aa.rL...azr: —u,},i-ra=ate yt Liiyy,...e/ar — A s 41"-- .w....s - • -I i IC th.re are.sexy problama durtug traatisatastota. pteae 4 s.l ti atilt d61- 000 ad aslc for I no aMssin*,r.PILJ.R I i TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) WAS SENT ** COUNT 2 *** SEND *** NO REMOTE STATION I. D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT 1 1— 9-95 2:31PM 1 '41 " 2 TOTAL 0:01 '41 " 2 XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 CITY OF EE Y 11 ■ / 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH . FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 Mayor Council Members Mary E. Gates Hope Elder Ron Gintz City Manager Mahlon "Skip"Priest Kenneth E. Nyberg Robert Stead Ray Tomlinson Phil Watkins FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM TO: sar. Meyep DATE: 1 e1l7s' w H ?act.A FAX #: ^ 2817 NUMBER OF PAGES (Including Memo Sheet): a FROM: HQ - Qret' OFFICE OF: COM muoll 1f'vdirtfl411- Sea'vi°Q� RE: axh,eorcN -- A s StA4a. Re tX.t.J If there are any problems during transmission, please call 661-4000 and ask for PORMSIPAX.PRM CITY OF '_ • - (206)661-4000 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 January 9, 1995 Mr. Eric Wells, Project Superintendent Polygon Northwest Company 4040 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Campus Glen Subdivision-- King County File No. S89P0114; Federal Way File No. ILA-90-PP08, Request for Release of Performance Guarantees Dear Mr. Wells: This is in response to your December 19, 1994, correspondence requesting release of the performance portions of the cash deposits for wetland enhancement and buffer planting along the Bonneville Power Administration Easement. Our response is as follows: Buffer Planting A cash deposit in the amount of$3,840 was deposited with the city to guarantee the installation of the vegetative buffer along the south property line adjacent to the Bonneville Power Administration Easement. A recent site inspection shows that the trees have been planted in accordance with the approved landscape plan, however, several trees are in need of staking due to damage by recent high winds. Once the trees have been staked, please call me and we will issue a check in the amount of$2,688. Pursuant to the Federal Way City Code(FWCC), Section 22-149, $1,152 will be retained by the city for two years to guarantee maintenance of the plants. Wetland Enhancement A cash deposit in the amount of$3,840 was deposited with the city to guarantee the installation of wetland mitigation plantings on the site. Susan Meyer, the city's Wetland Ecologist, inspected the site for compliance with preliminary plat conditions relating to wetland mitigation and enhancement. Prior to the release of any portion of the cash deposit, the following must be addressed to the satisfaction of the city: 1. Pursuant to SEPA Condition No. 12(C), submit a report by Terra Associates, Inc., which states that the wetland mitigation installed complies with the approved mitigation plan. Mr. Eric Wells January 9, 1995 Page 2 2. Verify that the woodpecker boxes have been installed in compliance with the approved mitigation plan. 3. Regrade and stabilize Lots 61 and 62 and remove any slide material from the wetland and buffer in Tract G. The recent site visit revealed that two significant landslides have recently occurred within the vicinity of Lots 61 and 62. These slides resulted in sediment being deposited in the on-site wetland and wetland buffer in Tract G. These slopes must be stabilized as soon as possible to prevent future sliding in these areas. Once the slopes have been regraded and stabilized, erosion control matting must be installed to ensure that these slopes do not fail in the future. It may also be desirable to plant or seed this area with red alder to provide a more solid root structure for long term slope stability. Please submit a plan to Ron Garrow, Senior Development Engineer, for review and approval prior to commencing work. 4. Remove all debris and trash from the northern portion of Tract G in the vicinity of the culvert. • 5. Provide wetland enhancement in the eastern portion of Tract C as required in the approved wetlands enhancement plan. The plan required that the compacted soil be over-excavated and replaced with 12 inches of top soil prior to planting. Based on the site visit, there is no evidence that either occurred. This area must, therefore, be over-excavated, replaced with topsoil and planted in accordance with approved plans. 6. Plant installation within the wetland creation area in Tract G could not be adequately assessed due to the depth of surface water. In addition, it appears that there are some conflicts,between the civil plans and the wetland mitigation plans as far as the amount of over-excavation to be done to provide for adequate hydrology for the wetland plants. We will be following up on this issue with the city's Wetland Ecologist and will get back to you in the near future on our findings. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 661-4111. Sincerely, c'f&Otod 4I •Uarc Margaret H. Clark Senior Planner C: City of Federal Way W&H Pacific Kathy McClung,Land Use Administrator Susan D.Meyer,Wetland Ecologist Ron Garrow,Senior Development Engineer 3025- 112th Avenue NE Julie Venn,Engineering Plans Reviewer PO Box C-97034 Bellevue,WA 98009-9304 CM P USG LN\RELEAS E.B N D ED COMMUNITY FV p�pB F.Y PAFITMENT PACIFIC JAN 1 9 1995 3025-112th Avenue N.E. P.O.Box C-97304 Bellevue,WA 98009-9304 MEMORANDUM TO: Margaret Clark, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Susan Meyer, Wetland Ecologist, W&H Pacific 'YY DATE: January 17, 1995 RE: Campus Glen - As-built Review Job No: 3-0420-0601 This memo provides comments on the wetland creation area and the discrepancy between the wetland creation plan and the grading that occurred on-site. Comments are based on a phone conversation with Garret Munger of Terra Associates, who was on-site during wetland creation implementation and a site visit on December 28, 1994. It is my understanding that the City's primary concern is whether or not the recently installed plantings will survive in the wetland creation area since the grades for part of the wetland area do not match those of the wetland/landscaping plan. It would be very difficult to determine whether many of the installed plants will survive at this time. Water levels are high, and much of the plant material has not yet emerged out of the water. It would be best to perform a site visit in early spring to assess whether some of the plants are likely to survive. Recommendations • An as-built drawing of the wetland creation area could be developed now with the other as- built drawings. If changes to the wetland planting scheme occurs, the as-built could be ammended at that time. • The applicant's biologist should visit the site in mid-March to conduct an early plant survival assessment. At that time, it may be necessary for some of the plants to be moved or new plants to be installed in different locations. If you have any questions, please call me at 828-2857. 3-0420-0601\Asbuilt.mem (206)827-0220 Fax(206)822-5341 Planning•Engineering•Surveying•Landscape Design•Environmental Services t� POLYGON 1: NORTHWEST COMPANY moor/DEVEi.OQMIE�NT BY COM JAI Z 3 '5OEPAI 041 January 19, 1995 Margaret H. Clark, AICP Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1st: Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Campus Glen Dear Margaret: I have enclosed a copy of the wetland report prepared by Terra Associates dated December 6, 1994. I apologize for not sending one down earlier. I was not aware that you were without a copy. I would also like to get a letter from you stating the start date of our maintenance period on the plantings of the tree buffer and the wetlands. I am not concerned with the deposits until we have infbrination from Susan and we have chance to talk. But I would expect our maintenance period tc have started around December 1, 1994 and I am not sure how Federal Way begins the maintenance period. Please give me a call and let me know how we will handle this. Sincerely, • Eric H.G. Wells Project Manager EW:Ip bi22,1p,CLARI.fRB.POC 4030 Lake Washington Blvd.NE,Suite 201,Kirkland,WA 98033 (206)822-7700 Fax(206)827-4098 CITY OF• 8D (206)661-4000 NY� P11145 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 February 22, 1995/ Updated March 2, 1995 Polygon Northwest Company 4040 Lake Wash. Blvd NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 Atten: Eric Wells Subject: Campus Glen As-builts and Wetland Tract G Permit No. ILA90-PPO8 Dear Mr. Wells: A site inspection was conducted during the initial as-built review. A concern arose with regard to the layout of wetland Tract G as noted in the letter from Margaret Clark, dated January 9, 1995. Since that time, you and I have spoken about the situation, I have met on-site with your biologist, Garet Munger, Terra Assoc. and I have discussed the issue internally and with the City's wetland biologist. The Public Works Department has reviewed the following: (please refer to the attachments for reference) 1. The as-built plan (A) match the approved civil plan for that area in question (B). No revision to the plans have been made to depict the grading done in the question area (B). 2. Physical site inspection indicate signs of grading in the question area not designated for grading per the civil plans. Polygon construction staff's spot elevations (dated 2-16-95) have been reviewed (C). 3. The approved wetland mitigation plan (D) shows grading and revegetation in the question area. 4. The wetland mitigation plan and the civil plan do not match (E is a composite of A & D). 5 Does the initial wetland report (Parametrix, April 1992) and photos (F) denote natural vegetation in the question area which does not exist today? In conclusion the Public Works Department recognizes some uncertainties about the future viability of the existing wetland and the revegetated area as it exists today because of the grading. Plantings designated on the plans may not survive in the question area because of lack of required saturated soils. Also the planting of the mitigation vegetation may not have been completed per plan. Page 2,. March 2, 1995 Eric Wells The submitted as-built civil engineering plans will be accepted as drawn to date but the Wetland G- sheet 12/19 may need revisions to depict the acceptance of the wetland mitigation plantings. With regard to the wetland mitigation plan and planting, all pertinent documents are being reviewed by the City's contracted wetland biologist. I expect to receive a memo from the biologist mid next week. The mitigation bond funds will be held until such time as the mitigation plans are revised or revegetation has been substantiated. Respectfully, Julie A. Venn Engineering Plans Reviewer Attachments: copy of referenced maps c: Margaret Clark, Senior Planner Ron Garrow,-Senior Development Engineer Keith Fabing, W&H Pacific, PO Box C-97304, Bellevue, WA 98009-9304 Garet Munger, Terra Assoc, 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, WA 98034 4- POLYGON la.NORTHWEST COMPANY February 15, 1995 Julie Venn City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Campus Glen Wetlands Dear Julie: Following up on our phone conversation last week 1 would like to submit the attached map. These grades were shot on February 14, 1995 by Polygon construction staff. After discussing these elevations with staff on site I can offer the following conclusion. The water level of the uninventoried wetland seems to fluctuate with flow of drainage water. On February 14, 1995 the water level was only about 6". The above mentioned wetland does seem to hold more water during the rains however as suggested in previous reports the level recedes quite rapidly. The grades show that we could establish an outlalI to the stream areas from the created wetland. My concerns would be that we are changing the ccostructurc of the uninventoried wetlands as it has existed for years. Please review this information and get back to me the week of February 20, 1995. I would like to bring this to conclusion or set a date in the early spring to revisit the site and check the water level. With either solution I would like to have a release of the cash funds posted for the planting of the wetlands. The amounts posted for maintenance and the agreement to monitor and warranty for 5 years should be security for any concerns awaiting the spring observation. Sincerely, Eric 1LG. Wells Project Manager EW:Ip cc. Margaret Clark Garret Munger b/22Ap/VENNLTR2.DOC 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201,Kirkland,Washington 98033 (206)822-7700 Fax(206)827-4098 .L \ I vi. W w r `� \ • , ,„\\\__ \ co i \i N ' N l • • rn Z �'/ is , 1 5 \ p ) I - . ..... -• 4 fIC I � L.- K / w I Li 0 ..-.. ....-"44 .-.....".1... \ 111 ••• el /... .......... / V) WN \ NI ` J W VVV _ _ . \cc' . ..... . OZZ • ,,..,,� , �� — � / U o - I. j ,.--= 2 1 \r-N\,....)-1, '.---; . \\: -1:-. N 0 -1 _- nor + 2 \�• \\ ( W W c, wcng . Cr) CO a _..—._..._ - -- w 2 cc O w / 7/.. No J - , , W y �Z� 'zit 3 • \ \ y yw I �Z . O Z 3 JUviw w -10 \ , LEJ ; x M 1---- \,,. "---„tok `...,..„ i 01 in < / - a y 1 - -... u h \\ \ a t I A- CO Z � t ix U 3 -- --- O ? ----.....„....,......4.,, U O t� c--� c w-.(c fl O --.._ � \ �o _ iaUZQ U , . / 1 J Z J�j \`t s �t`� � J C �f� -_.•6 Ncc2W v z �' _ _o' C / . � ZOUa. W --�� - G �� I J J 5 From: JULIE VENN To: MARGAREC Date: Thursday, February 2, 1995 2 :52 pm Subject: Campus Glen Wetland Received a phone call from Eric Wells today at 2 : 30pm. He discussed the concern we have for the over abundance of water in the treed portion of the wetland. We scheduled a tentative site meeting for early next week. Their biologist, Garrett, will be there too. I'm glad to hear that they are concerned about the issue and Eric is on top of it. He also mentioned a letter that Susan is supposed to be writing about her last discussion with Garrett (prior to her going to GEO Dimension) regarding the wetland mitigation plantings, etc. I'll let you know the time and date of the meeting as soon as I find out. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM January 24, 1995 TO: Ron Garrow, Senior Development Engineer FROM: Margaret H. Clark, Senior Planner, Telephone 661-4111 SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of Campus Glen-- Interlocal Agreement "A" list Item, King County File No. S89P0114, Federal Way File No.ILA-90-PPO8 -- Release of Performance Bond Please release $2,688 out of the total cash deposit of$3,840 deposited with the City to guarantee the installation of the vegetative buffer along the south property line adjacent to the Bonneville Power Administration Easement. A recent site inspection shows that the trees have been planted in accordance with the approved landscape plan. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Section 22-149, $1,152 will be retained by the City for two years to guarantee maintenance of the plants. This maintenance period started on December 1, 1994. Thank you. CMPUS GLN\BUFERBND.REL 1 MAR— 7-95 TUE 15 :21 W&H PACIFIC P _ 02 PACIFIC 3025.1I2th Avmri N.I's. 11.0.Box C-97304 Sel Ievuc,WAQRbff4-6n804 MEMORANDUM TO: Margaret Clark,Senior Planner,City of Federal Way FROM: Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist, 'W4414 Pacific DATE: March 7, 1995 RE: Campus GIen-As-built Review Job No: 3-0420-0601 This memo provides comments on the Wetland Planting Plan for the Compensating Storage Pond(Tract "G-") which was produced by Terra Associates, Inc. (1-19-94,revised 3-29-94). A discrepancy exists between the Terra Associates,Inc.plan and the Tract"K"Detention Pond engineering drawings produced by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (2-14-94). it is my understanding that the City's primary concerns ate as follows: Site grading and plant installation for the Tract G" Compensating Storage Pond does not conform with the Wetland Planting Plan produced by Terra Associates, Inc. Pill material was placed in an area located northeast of the constructed Compensating Storage Pond which does not conform with either the Terra Associates, Enc. plan or the Barghauson Consulting Engineers,Inc.plan. A field investigation was completed on 3-1-95 to assess site conditions. The goals of the field investigation,findings,and recommendations are as follows: Determine if fill had been placed northeast of the constructed Tract"G" Compensating Storage Pond. Four test points(TPI thru TP4)were sampled along a transect to determine hydrologic status and the extent of fill material placed within the area in question. TP1 was located approximately 13 feet from the east end of the existing Compensating Storage Pond and exhibited inundation at an approximate depth of it)inches, TP2 was located approximately 33 feet beyond the east end of the storage pond,and exhibited a fill dcpth of approximately 13 inches with soil saturation at a depth of 18 inches. TP3 was located approximately 17 feet east of TP2,and exhibited a fill depth of approximately 14 inches with soil saturation at a depth of 15 inches. TP4 was located approximately 27 feet east of TP3,and exhibited a fill depth of approximately 8 inches with no saturated soils within 18 inches of the ground surface. TP2, TP3 and TP4 were excavated to approximately 20 inches in depth with a sharpshooter shovel. (206)827.0220 Fax(206)822.5341 Planning,- ;7g•Survcyir;g•I,uidscape D sig,t•ISt,VIrO,l,nentai.S rvices MAR-- T-95 TUE 1 m 22 W0.H CI F I C P - 0 4 t PAC i Campus Olen-As-built Review March 7, 1995 Page 2 Recommendations: Resolve the discrepancies between the approved wetland mitigation plan produced by Terra Associates, Inc. and the approved civil plans produced by Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. Provide Polygon Northwest Company with the finalized approved plan. If it is determined that the above documented fill placement does not comply with the finalized approved plan,advise Polygon Northwest Company that mitigation area as-built must comply to the approved plan to satisfy mitigation requirements. Confirm placement of nesting boxes as described in the Tract "K" Detention Pond engineering drawings produced by Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. Six nesting boxes were observed as indicated on the plans. Inspect erosion control plastic covering installed to control two landslides in the vicinity of Lots 61 and 62. Portions of the plastic covering placed over eroding soils has become displaced due to ineffective sandbagging anchors, Recommendations: In the short term,advise Polygon Northwest Company that immediate action must be taken to adequately control erosion within and adjacent to the slide area to avoid additional damage to the riparian corridor. If plastic is replaced,anchoring devices must be more effective that the failed sandbag system. Priority should be given to analysis of long-term erosion control solutions that can stabilize eroding slopes and arc compatible to this riparian sensitive area. Inspect Tract"C"and associated setback area for removal of dumped trash. Trash was observed to be floating in the wetland within Tract"G." Recommendations: Advise Polygon Northwest Company that all trash must be immediately removed by hand from Tract"G"and its associated setback arca. Inspect Tract"G"for topsoil placement and installation of specified plantings within the compacted soil area of the sewer easement. No plant materials were observed to be planted within the easement area. If you have any questions,please call me at 828-2857. 3-0420-060 i lAsbuilt2.mem ut wFM I PACIFIC EN TQEp 1.MENT 3025-112th Avenue N.E. P.O.Box C-97304 MAR 8 ig95 Bellevue,WA 98009-9304 MEMORANDUM TO: Margaret Clark, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist, W&H Pacific DATE: March 7, 1995 RE: Campus Glen -As-built Review Job No: 3-0420-0601 This memo provides comments on the Wetland Planting Plan for the Compensating Storage Pond(Tract "G") which was produced by Terra Associates, Inc. (1-19-94, revised 3-29-94). A discrepancy exists between the Terra Associates,Inc.plan and the Tract"K"Detention Pond engineering drawings produced by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (2-14-94). It is my understanding that the City's primary concerns are as follows: Site grading and plant installation for the Tract "G" Compensating Storage Pond does not conform with the Wetland Planting Plan produced by Terra Associates, Inc. Fill material was placed in an area located northeast of the constructed Compensating Storage Pond which does not conform with either the Terra Associates, Inc. plan or the Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. plan. A field investigation was completed on 3-1-95 to assess site conditions. The goals of the field investigation, findings, and recommendations are as follows: Determine if fill had been placed northeast of the constructed Tract "G" Compensating Storage Pond. Four test points(TP1 thru TP4)were sampled along a transect to determine hydrologic status and the extent of fill material placed within the area in question. TP1 was located approximately 13 feet from the east end of the existing Compensating Storage Pond and exhibited inundation at an approximate depth of 10 inches. TP2 was located approximately 33 feet beyond the east end of the storage pond, and exhibited a fill depth of approximately 13 inches with soil saturation at a depth of 18 inches. TP3 was located approximately 17 feet east of TP2,and exhibited a fill depth of approximately 14 inches with soil saturation at a depth of 15 inches. TP4 was located approximately 27 feet east of TP3, and exhibited a fill depth of approximately 8 inches with no saturated soils within 18 inches of the ground surface. TP2, TP3 and TP4 were excavated to approximately 20 inches in depth with a sharpshooter shovel. (206)827-0220 Fax(206)822-5341 Planning•Engineering•Surveying•Landscape Design•Environmental Services '• PACIFIC Campus Glen -As-built Review March 7, 1995 Page 2 Recommendations: Resolve the discrepancies between the approved wetland mitigation plan produced by Terra Associates, Inc. and the approved civil plans produced by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Provide Polygon Northwest Company with the finalized approved plan. If it is determined that the above documented fill placement does not comply with the finalized approved plan, advise Polygon Northwest Company that mitigation area as-built must comply to the approved plan to satisfy mitigation requirements. Confirm placement of nesting boxes as described in the Tract "K" Detention Pond engineering drawings produced by Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. Six nesting boxes were observed as indicated on the plans. Inspect erosion control plastic covering installed to control two landslides in the vicinity of Lots 61 and 62. Portions of the plastic covering placed over eroding soils has become displaced due to ineffective sandbagging anchors. Recommendations: In the short term,advise Polygon Northwest Company that immediate action must be taken to adequately control erosion within and adjacent to the slide area to avoid additional damage to the riparian corridor. If plastic is replaced, anchoring devices must be more effective that the failed sandbag system. Priority should be given to analysis of long-term erosion control solutions that can stabilize eroding slopes and are compatible to this riparian sensitive area. Inspect Tract"G"and associated setback area for removal of dumped trash. Trash was observed to be floating in the wetland within Tract"G." Recommendations: Advise Polygon Northwest Company that all trash must be immediately removed by hand from Tract"G" and its associated setback area. Inspect Tract"G" for topsoil placement and installation of specified plantings within the compacted soil area of the sewer easement. No plant materials were observed to be planted within the easement area. If you have any questions, please call me at 828-2857. 3-0420-0601\Asbuilt2.mem CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM March 23, 1995 TO: Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist, W & H Pacific FROM: Margaret H. Clark, Senior Planner, Telephone 661-4111 SUBJECT: Plat of Campus Glen--Interlocal Agreement "A" list Item, King County File No. S89P0114, Federal Way File No.ILA-90-PP08 We will be meeting with Eric Wells of Polygon, Northwest at 9:00 a.m., on Tuesday, March 28, 1995 to discuss what should be done about the discrepancy between the approved wetland plan and the civil plan. It appears that the existing grading on-site conforms to the civil plans and not the approved wetland enhancement plan. This has resulted in the following: Water is not ponding in the area marked with an "X" on the enclosed plan. This area was supposed to have been planted with 125 cattails. a) Have the cattails been planted in this area? Julie Venn thinks that they have not. b) If they have been planted, will they survive? If they will not survive what should be done to remedy the situation? (i) Should we have them regrade this area? (ii) Should wetland vegetation that will survive under these conditions be substituted? c) Has the higher elevation in the area marked with an "X" resulted in more standing water in Tract G, the pre-existing uninventoried wetland? If it has, will the trees and other vegetation in this area survive? If the answer to this question is that the plants will not survive, what is your recommendation? 1 We are looking for a solution. The goal is that adequate mitigation in terms of wetland enhancement must be provided for the crossing of the wetland by S. 330th Place. b) If this can be accomplished by the existing situation, and you feel that the intent of the wetland mitigation plan has been met, we will release the proportionate amount of the wetland performance bond. This is assuming that all plants as called for on the mitigation plan have been installed. c) If either the new plants or the existing plants will not survive, they must modify the planting and regrade if necessary to meet the intent of the wetland mitigation plan. Please respond ASAP so that we can formulate a position prior to Tuesday's meeting. Thank you. CMPUSGLN\W ITNDMI .QUE 2 SURFACE .. — i —' r ::< i1jI r+ 6s"5 t\ \ '3" .j/-jrL4-' _�°w*�ti = ` r.,, }:s� 330 -- ^',-- s wipe WAVE'. j � ---------- _ — — —" �- � � , ACCESS ROAD O\��.�``�` 20X SLOPE _ice . -325 42 :� ��; ` • 6' WIDE BERM =. /RIP RAP P ii \\ . . -- _ —5 c ((1/_( . V7/71i '' N. A� � xiSGL»' e��ont✓ V \\\ 1� � CaPs, ' p der .. °'':i:.,, t.:. . ' .. , ,''::::-'''':` ..'-;',14'}; V. r �•C �,�ti-,4.1';„\,,,.. 1„:,:la:ws.,,,,p7„:„35:°:,®.,,- \ ,ao 1 a 0 5 g !t �5�• \;. 1 (UN 2 CRIED WETI-Ati ) IL ` i it��• '� , "' �'"f IL- \ • • - ` `\ � �/ �� 1 f' (l ( `-� • /mot � ,� .�,� i> .l ii: t& �' ..,214.--' — -' . ., . 4..-e).? .,.„0,b.- .::... ., . ••-‘•... -----,p,..i:;' - /v74-"). ..••-• ...... 7If , a""' r fi � k � ,, $ ' qp ..a �•ec, � N` r :y* ,1; P`: ✓.f• r :' - . 'y ,4. u tq -,n .,� �'', w . � 7 -3 �� sQ/b n , A/ _: ;,i 'e� � ` s 1 z eii' qv L rd ,i " �. � vv. I' r�q a� i: 'fi � 41 k,al,.. ` %e � v `' . ? ujtYYi,i'. ; J` iaay� 4'. T. av • < 5 t y 1 � " -4 •fi' .,"1 '��i :e,. , a<y ' Y Y3 1I 'Y1;C pt x / , • • � , . . + 0N,. •tiim`'�� ...s, ;P ,.t b j� e ' . :� / tr� "-"--a _ ' r k � t F,N x^, • • , �, - ' � ' a ,��. 'pq � 1aVto I t'i � '4r ; ` • ° ' 7 . •� �./y '� "9'�Q lamk r u+• nr r .A --, t ,c�n sP* • ,.-rY Kr iy, . j i Fa ;r .,' - _ .� rp •a 'es_! �� *r«....v�''; `dz�• • :s ,, a ,."r �+Y7TA y• u r ` :c>< , _ y&,-_ C `,lt Ca J i : g :�,i..,, a s, 'ltssEE i i•kv,o } '- vS 14 4 t S xw . k44!4 �P t • •Y.' „ b J krh }; a 4, ,.:: c k,. .. , "°" '"k, P4,-. a , . f r 5 i q w 1 • CITY of gr1 C206)667-1000 '•=; 02 T 33630 1ST WAV SOUTH FEaERAL WAY.WA 913003-6210 Mayor Connell Members Marry Dates lack Dovey Hope lalder City .Manager Ron Ointz Kenneth E. Nyberg Mahlon "Skip" Priest Ray Tomlinson Philip Watkins FAX "r &NSMITTAI., MEMOR.A,/IVDUM rCL�9 t 1:4 £A.T E: =R/ FAX r#: �ert., "ova-— 5 3Oic/ NUMBER OF PAC3ES (Including Met-no Sheet) 4- FROM: Nicervor- j OFFICE OF/A:: -- C�w w � ryas tiY RE: l�M>t L. t.ka44s‘.44 Tf there are any problems during this trananelssioa, please dell 661-4000 and oak.for TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) WAS SENT ** COUNT ** # 4 *** SEND *** NO REMOTE STATION I. D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES CCMMENT 1 8225341 3-23-95 16:47 3' 35" 4 TOTAL 0:03' 35" 4 XEROX. TELECOPIER 7020 CITY OF G • F�]E (206)661-4000 f'y 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 Mayor Council Members Mary Gates Jack Dovey Hope Elder City Manager Ron Gintz Kenneth E. Nyberg Mahlon "Skip" Priest Ray Tomlinson Philip Watkins FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM TO: I(C:lax. Fo,)b h Q DATE: 3/Q 3/9.5 UT. 1•1 FAX #: I WI- 534/ NUMBER OF PAGES (Including Memo Sheet) 4 FROM: t►lC:blare,' (-00.04 OFFICE OF: arArf.vrA 'N w*+1-1 RE: Cavils/4 C4t1.., tok>44.01.4 . If there are any problems during this transmission, please call 661-4000 and • ask for t. 04/14/95 09:00 FAX 206 828 2888 W&H PACIFIC (21003 t PACIFIC 3025-112th Avenue N.E. P.O.Box C-97304 Bellevue,WA 98009-9304 MEMORANDUM TO: Margaret Clark,Senior Planner,City of Federal Way FROM: Keith Fabing,Wetland Biologist,W&H Pacific i DATE: April 14, 1995 RE: Field Inspection for Campus Glen,Tract"G" JOB NO: 3.420-0801 (1.26) ti This memo provides follow-up guidance on the We land Planting plan for the Compensa g Storage Pend(Tract"WI(1-19-94,modified 3-29-94)prepared by Terra Associates,Inc. and a summary of our field inspection completed on March 28, 1995. The field inspection was attended by Garret Munger of Terra Associates,Inc. and Eric Wells of Polygon Northwest. The following topics were discussed. Planting Plan for Tract"G" It was acknowledged by Garret Munger that the Wetland Planting Plan was modified to conform to the approved Tract "K" Detention Pond engineering drawings produced by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (2-1-94). Mr. Munger stated that the installed plant densities match or exceed the densities in the approved Wetland Planting Plan. It was acknowledged that an area of fill deposition located northeast of the installed compensating storage pond did not conform to design contours sited in the approved Barghausen engineering plans. No as-built drawings were available to complete an inventory of installed plant materials to confirm installed plant densities,or to assess as-built contour discrepancies. It is recommended that an as-built plan be produced documenting all installed plant materials,including an assessment of their existing vigor status(live,stressed,or dead). The as-built plan should include a post-construction topographic survey completed to a 1-foot contour resolution. The as-built can then be compared with the approved Barghausen plan to document observed elevation discrepancies. Plant material composition and densities can then be assessed to determine conformance to the goals outlined in the approved Wetland Planting P' f tb Comnen a t,gStorage pond(Tract"G"1(1-1-94.modified 3-29-94) Tract"G"Native Growth Protection Easement(NGPE)Inundation Julie Venn(Engineering Plans Reviewer,City of Federal Way)expressed concern on March 1. 1995 that prolonged inundation of black cottonwood(Populus halsam(fera)and red alder(Maws rubra)located within the Tract"G" Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) may result in an increase in tree mortality. Sedimentation and water marks were observed during the March 28 field inspection confirming that stream bank overflow has impacted the hydrologic regime within the NGPE. A wetland (206)827-0220 Fax(206)822-5341 Planning•Engineering•Surveying•Landscape Design•Environmental Services sommi 4/14/95 09:00 FAX 206 88 2888 W&H PACIFIC L 002 (. I \( 11 �� Field Inspection for Campus Glen,Tract"G"Memo April 14, 1995 Page 2 assessment for the NGPE was completed by Pararnetrix, Inc., and was submitted in a memorandum prepared for Glenn Byrd, January 15, 1992. The field investigation for the NGPE was completed on October 28, 1991 noting seasonal ponding water marks and stained leaves. It is the position of Garret Munger and Eric Wells that installation of the Tract"K"detention pond and the Tract"G"compensating storage pond has not affected hydrologic characteristics observed in the NGPE. They feel that any observed increase in inundation in this area is a result of increased hydrograph fluctuations in the adjacent stream,which is likely a result of upstream impervious surface development located beyond the Campus Glen project area. Black cottonwood and red alder are typical of riparian habitats and other poorly drained sites subject to annual flooding. However,sustained inundation throughout the growing season could result in anaerobic conditions of sufficient duration to increase mortality risk. It is recommended that a review of available hydrologic data for the adjacent stream be completed by the City of Federal Way to assess if a correlation exists between recent Campus Glen on-site development and the duration of inundation within the NGPE resulting from stream inflow. It is also recommended that observations of inundation levels within the NGPE be included in all mitigation monitoring field investigations and monitoring report submittals. 420-0601/CGIEN.mem R ' CITY OF !� 410 (206)661-4000 FW 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 May 8, 1995 Mr. Eric Wells, Project Superintendent Polygon Northwest Company f‘V:e*6 4040 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Campus Glen Subdivision-- King County File No. S89P0114; Federal Way File No. ILA-90-PP08, Request for Wetland As-Built Plans Dear Mr. Wells: This is a follow-up to the March 28, 1995, site visit attended by you, Garet Munger of Terra Associates, Inc., Keith Fabing of Wilsey & Ham Pacific, and staff from the City of Federal Way. At that time, we discussed the need for As-built plans for the wetland planting areas in order for the city's Wetlands Biologist to determine if wetland plants had been installed in substantial compliance with the approved wetland planting plan prepared 1/19/94 and revised 3/29/94. By June 15, 1995, please provide us with an As-built plan for all areas required to be enhanced, pursuant to the approved wetland planting plan. The As-built plan must include the following: 1. List and depict all installed plantings by species. 2. Specify existing vigor status (live, stressed, or dead). 3. Provide a post-construction topographic survey completed to a one-foot contour resolution. With this information, the city's Wetland Biologist will compare the As-built plan with the approved engineering plans to document observed elevation discrepancies. In addition, plant material composition and densities can be assessed to determine conformance to the goals outlined in the approved wetland planting plan. Due to existing deviations in the field from the approved wetland planting plan, concerns about the functioning of the existing wetland located within Tract G, and the recommendations in the approved wetland planting plan (Note 8 of Construction Notes on Sheet 2 of 2), an as-built report must accompany the as-built plan. If the plant conditions in this report are acceptable in p Mr. Eric Wells May 8, 1995 Page 2 terms of plant vigor and survivability, 70 percent of the cost of nursery plantings ($1,848) plus $1,200 retained for construction inspection and consultation by your wetland biologist will be released to you for a total of$3,048. The remaining $792 will be retained by the city throughout the five-year monitoring period to cover plant replacement. The first monitoring report, as specified in the October 1994 "Agreement to Monitor Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan," must be submitted to the city by October 31, 1995, with subsequent reports being submitted within 12 months of the prior report. Please also be aware that prior to any wetland funds being released, the following must also be completed to the satisfaction of the city: 1. Regrade and stabilize Lots 61 and 62 and remove any slide material from the wetland and buffer in Tract G. Slides in these areas resulted in sediment being deposited within the wetland and wetland buffer in Tract G. Please submit a plan to Ron Garrow, Senior Development Engineer, for review and approval prior to commencing work. 2. Remove all debris and trash from all on-site wetlands and their buffers. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 661-4111. Sincerely, Margaret H. Clark, AICP Senior Planner c: City of Federal Way Kathy McClung, Land Use Administrator Ron Garrow, Senior Development Engineer Julie Venn, Engineering Plans Reviewer W & H Pacific Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist 3025-112th Avenue NE PO Box C-97034 Bellevue, WA 98009-9304 CMPUSGLNIASRUILT POLYGON 1M NORTHWEST COMPANY June 14, 1995 Margaret Clark City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Campus Glen Dear Margaret: We would like to submit this letter and the attached documents in response to your May 8, 1995 letter. I have enclosed 2 copies of the as built planting plan along with the planting report completed by Terra and Associates on December 6, 1994. I performed a site visit on June 9, 1995 and found that a majority of the plantings are in good health. Enclosed you will find a memo from Terra and Associates making a similar conclusion from site visit in February and March. I believe our most valuable information will come forth in the October 1995 monitoring report. At that time we should be able to accurately assess the condition of plantings and then take any corrective actions if necessary. The post construction topo survey seems to be a new condition and a costly endeavor that I would like to appeal. The city has been provided with a complete as built set of civil drawings and I believe that this will provide adequate detail without requiring additional cosly engineering work. Please contact Julie Vern for a copy of the as builts. As to the stabilization of the slope along lots 61 and 62, our intent is to begin that operation the first half of July. I will submit a letter of explanation to Ron Garrow this week for his review and approval. I will update you in July on the progress on the slope and at that time request a release of funds for the nursery plantings. Sincerely, Eric II.G. Wells Project Manager 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201,Kirkland,Washington 98033 (206)822-7700 Fax(206)827-4098 TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences December 6, 1994 Project No. T-2521 Mr. Eric Wells Polygon Northwest Company 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland,Washington 98033 Subject: Wetland Mitigation Post Installation Monitoring Campus Glen Federal Way,Washington Dear Mr.Wells: As requested, we have examined the installation of the wetland and buffer plantings for the Campus Glen residential development presently under construction in Federal Way. We visited the site with Mr. Mark Howard of Landmark Landscaping and Maintenance on November 23, 1994 to review site conditions prior to installation of the wetland and buffer plantings. We completed a post-installation inspection on November 29, 1994 when the plantings had been completed. Plantings have been provided for three separate Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) tracts. These include Tracts C and E in which buffer enhancement plantings have been installed, and the compensating storage pond in Tract G for which wetland and buffer plantings have been provided. The buffer enhancement plantings in Tracts C and E have been installed in accordance with the intent of the Buffer Enhancement Plan. At the time of our site visit on November 23, 1994,there appeared to be variation from the recommended grading shown on the Planting Plan within the Compensating Storage Area. This required adjustment in the location of the plant materials to reflect anticipated water depths. These adjustments were made in the field and the plant materials have been installed. The plant materials as installed satisfy the intent of the wetland Planting Plan. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (206) 821-7777 Mr. Eric Wells December 6, 1994 We do not recommend additional work in the three NGPE Tracts at this time to ensure that the enhancement goals will be achieved at the end of the three year monitoring period. Plant materials should be examined again in the spring to determine viability and replacements should be made as may be required at that time. Other provisions for maintenance and continued monitoring as outlined in the Planting Plan over the three year monitoring period should be carried out to ensure achievement of project goals. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC. 6yyz .. Garet P. Munger Project Scientist Project No. T-2521 Page No. 2 CV O d . ‘ f 0 g K '. D „� s. `G pCp UI q4 n '111 .- 17, (A:, CC ,n o ' 0 0 lb gib. a' Ii ! I-) < C -v ¢ ' C q _ CO LA p„ g. �.. AD v CA tad L G a u O O = C o o g R Cz C N .0 .VI 2 G C O VO '0 r d c LU en %3 W o .. wv n as us .0 tt Q L pp i ati 0 En U« 0 °4.4e A. • 'a Ce CO ,Z V C 0 o FA J co:f .o 3 rGs f+ '� a > - Ui C CA C m C Ca ^- '. 0, w F- -�> - ii OIL o - -- _ 3 u ig m W m 2 m 8 - CO G v G 0 C UDA § 8 0 in rvi .�.,.a=.,(.+��..,� y it T.: CI �- U) — 8 3 0 0 • S r e CfTY OF � • -= = Fr7 PUBLIC WORKS uv RY DEPARTMENT FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM TO: S 2.1c_ IN LL Date: - Zc)" � 5 Pc L-`1 Go l\/ FAX #: - 4Oc), FAX6-1) Y NUMBER OF PAGES " (Including Memo Sheet) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,11ill 2 fCk(e FROM: Julie A. Venn, Engineering Plans Reviewer � Phone: 661-4125 Fax: 661-4129 WO OFFICE OF: Development Review RE: \AiETLPNP 1`1\1-r1G-,AT1D,4 ATLEt ToPo Svi2,VEy A r t24.— q E 4 1 e c cv t,J E--la.►-c.Q & hO4 ed O n $C-t4(9.c kjcJ ma - "p,ro 1C\-e 3P404- e O&ior, S 25' OC. Sec- oy,S ,Gross Z,r�a td b2ohd rl) `at (-ba43r- ��vac 2 aA.orn ,S -Nre_ . r, a-i- slev. 3 Z 5 c p� ai orY1 Gov m p vYP a lor« nor4k) 5Po e.1sevck--4zon -tOp crF `cyerw, o-F L.ornviS? w peOva Swede.. GI 5p0+ va aY, lr, tAk-4-10 r4 . C : ��rr\-k - TAX 82Z �34 I 4 - . I. '' .„ .::\ . -. ..r‘„\,,,, — -• \ - -...... - . •.\\ .......................... v� "---- -1'. \• N / \1 ‘\\\1.• \ • ..,cp t:ofsi.,:„i,,,I.i..-•.-, gt402.,,.•.‘ v.,,,,k4N •. • i+5 °' II 1 ' 1 1 1 1;1. ' 1 1 t t N - O.d 1 1 1 1 , 1 1$ / L'\\\\i \\\\V\\ 1. • t 0.1.:, g • 11 i 1 1 1•• • Q 1 ,I1 . 1 1 1 1 x8 \____ -----\\is:2—H i 1:i :tat 11 1 1 1 k \ •t / ' 11. 1 o I 1 I tl1:; . W ! nil i , 1 . . . 1 co1 0 l i 1::::: .- 1 I 111:: :; : �� r71 1.:� \ 11 1N.7r. v / --i 1 I 1 I 1 1 I ; 1 1-� _ ......__. -_�ju), - -r 11 : -,� t It .:• ,-, � _ 3 s. !f , / �/ I I I t a 1 1tliiii \ t / ♦ I I I I I I I " \ ', _ ........._tea.:,: ............._ IvrilOP / 11 11 I I I. • \ / I 1 1 I 1 I :. (\ •. `,\ \� ••• �.......................... "` 1 1 1 : V , \ \ i r;e i1 l l I i i \ •,44.4 1 • •I \ I ..:,:- ‘ • • 7...7...'...i, ,,,, ,_. , . t15. DLH/ H t! " \ •. 1 ,, ,,)I .• --/, i .--, \in Le v" I NI .,.:--,; . r\ 1.43 --I-- 11 /. / • • .d . / .\ / • / / ',J.", \_ /j j I ..........„:.,:.::'...:'::::':.\--. - // :: : A. / • '/,/% : do .�1 F. : sir :..+•► ‘ 1 ' /�/ /// / / '�.:., ;' \. P.r ► / / , /etifi j/ o% • , :a..: / t t y_ 1 t I CI -,) \v / / \ _..., j • < 1 1 1 ,' 1 //y�/ / / il. % • • (iffii / : 1 -':,,k / /i1/�// / t"- i-L} -- _� I --N 1 1 iA/////' 1 �1 • t. 1 /,,,/fin L} �J o \�1 �-• • I't �` I I •• •: //////7/ Q 3 �'� I 1 1 - - - p \ i (../ : • 1 j 1/ 1/ 1• . : / ii n j I CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM September 28, 1995 TO: Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist, Adolphson Associates, Inc. 5309 Shilshole NW, Seattle, WA 98107 FROM: Margaret H. Clark, Senior Planner, Telephone 661-4111 SUBJECT: Wetlands As Built Inspection -- Plat of Campus Glen, Interlocal Agreement "A" list Item, King County File No. S89P0114, Federal Way File No.ILA-90- PPO8 Enclosed are maps and background information to do an as-built inspection of the wetlands located within Campus Glen. Please visit the site and provide us with a memorandum stating whether the plants in the wetlands have been installed in substantial compliance with the approved mitigation plan prepared 1/19/94 and revised 3/29/94. If they have, we will release the appropriate portion of the wetland bond. Enclosed are the following: 1. Contour Map prepared August 18, 1995. 2. June 29, 1995 Fax from Julie Venn to Eric Wells (2 pages). 3. June 14, 1995 Correspondence from Eric Wells to Margaret Clark (4 pages). 4. May 8, 1995 Correspondence from Margaret Clark to Eric Wells (2 pages). 5. February 22/March 2 1995 Correspondence from Julie Venn to Eric Wells (3 pages). 6. As-built Plans (2 pages). Should you have any questions, please call me at 661-4111. Thank you. CMPUSGLN\W TLNDMIT.INS 1 10/17/1995 13:25 2067899684 ADOLFSON ASSC PAGE 02 1 � MEMORANDUM1.6 ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES,INC. TO: Margaret Clark, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist, Adolfson Associates, Inc. DATE: October 16, 1995 RE: Campus Glen Planting Plan As-Built Inspection(File No. MA-90-PP08) JOB NO.: 9595-26 The purpose of this memo is to determine whether plant materials have been installed in substantial compliance with the approved mitigation plan sheets titled Wetland Planting Plan� raue Pond_Tact G us Glen. Federal Way. Waahin4on(hereafter referred to as "Tract G"), and BuP e n ea t Plan: NC'PE Tracts C and E Cattltlus Qlen.F c rat Way. Washington(hereafter individually refereed to as "Tract C" and "Tract E"). The plans were prepared for Polygon Northwest Company by Terra Associates. Inc. dated January 19, 1994 (revised March 29, 1994). A field inspection was completed on October 11, 1995. Tables 1, 2, and 3 summarize the quantity of plant materials identified in the plant schedule, growth status, total plants identified in the field, and percent survivability of individual species of installed plant materials. These comments are based on a review of the revised plan that addresses comments submitted in a letter on May 8, 1995 to Eric Wells of Polygon Northwest Company from Margaret Clark of the City of Federal Way. The following is a list of the information requested in the May 1995 letter(described in bold),a.summary of how each item was addressed in the revised mitigation plan(described in normal type), and items which require further action (described in italics). Additional analysis and comments are provided in the following section, 1. List and depict all installed plantings by species_ The following is a list of inconsistencies between the planting plan as-built and the plant schedule in Tract G. a. The planting plan as-built depicts 155 willow slips_ The plant schedule indicates 170 willow slips. e. Environmental Analysis 5309 SkiisholeAve. NW Seattle. W4 98107 Plume(206)789-9658 Fax(206)789-9684 0 10/1711995 13:25 2067899624 ADOLFSON ASSC PAGE 03 Margaret Clark.City of Federal Way October 16.1995 Page 1 b. The planting plan as-built depicts 81 salmonberry plantings, The plant schedule indicates 80 salmonberry plantings. c. Eight installed salrnonberry plantings were discovered in an area depicted on the planting plan as-built as a circle located in northeast corner of Tract G. This circle should call out "8 Salmonberry." d, The planting plan as-built depicts 33 bulrush plantings. The plant schedule indicates 170 bulrush plantings. e_ The planting plan as-built depicts four areas where slough sedge was to be installed_ Only two of these areas depicts the quantities installed. The following is a list of inconsistencies between the planting plan as-built and the plant schedule in Tract C. f The planting plan as-built depicts installation of 14 unknown plant materials identified with a circled"d" symbol. This symbol is not called out in the plant schedule. g. The planting plan as-built depicts 17 Douglas-fir. The plant schedule indicates 16 Douglas-fir. h. The planting plan as-built depicts 13 vine maple. The plant schedule indicates 15 vine maple. i, The planting plan as-built depicts 4 huckleberry. The plant schedule indicates 12 huckleberry. The following item identifies an inconsistency between the planting plan as-built and the plant schedule in Tract E. j. The planting plan as-built depicts 14 Douglas-fir. The plant schedule indicates 16 Douglas-fir. Fifteen Douglas-fir were identified during the as-built inspection. Please correct the discrepancies between the planting plan as-built and the plant schedule in the October monitoring report submittal Adjust the plant schedule to reflect the planting plan. Provide quantities for slough sedge in all planting areas Identify the unlomwn plant material in Tract C. 2. Specify existing vigor status(live.stressed, or dead). Vigor status was,not provided for installed plant materials. 10/17/1995 13:25 2067899684 ADOLFSON ASSC PAGE 04 Margaret Clark,City of Federal Way October 16,1995 Page 3 Please provide vigor status for all plant materials in the October monitoring report submittal. 3. Provide a post-construction topographic survey completed to a one-foot contour resolution. A post-construction topographic survey was provided as requested, No further action is required 4. Regrade and stabilize Lots 61 and 62 and remove any slide material from the wetland and buffer in Tract G. I understand that this work has been completed and addressed by the Public Works Department. No further action is required 5. Remove all debris and trash from all on-site wetlands and their buffers. No trash or debris was observed within on-site wetlands, wetland buffers, or within the Compensating Storage Pond in Tract G_ Continue to monitor for the presence of debris and trash within on-site wetlands, wetland buffers, or within the Compensating Storage Pond in Tract G. Maintain an active and ongoing maintenance program addressing this issue. Please report the status of trash and debris in oll monitoring report submittals. Additional Comments I. The planting plan calls out "Bulrush" as "Scirpus macrocopusi The correct species name for this bulrush species is "microcarpus_" Please correct this species name for bulrush in the October monitoring report submittal. 2. Due to the observed high water level within the compensating storage pond within Tract 0,it proved difficult to assess the condition of bulrush, slough sedge and cattail. The vast majority of these species have not emerged above existing water levels. Assessment of percent survivability will not be possible until water levels have dropped to lower levels during the summer months. However, some of these emergent species have been installed outside of the inundated area north of the pond. 10/17/1995 13:25 2067899684 ADOLFSON ASSC PAGE 05 r Margaret Clark City of Federal Way October 16.1995 Page 4 Note mortality rates of bulrush, slough sedge and cattail located north of the pond area and provide percent survivability of these species beyond the inundated pond area. Table 1. Native Growth Protection Easement. Tract G _ gammon Name isntdfc lyamc Ouattity Lisa Streae.4 aid Mina lag %Syrvived Western Red Cedar Thuja pike= 42 35 0 8 0 43 83% Douglas-Fir Pierdovn+ga manaiusii 7 4 0 3 0 7 57% Vine Mac ,goer circinahon 7 6 0 0 1 6 86% Willow salts spp. 170 23 5 0 142 28 16% Red,.Osiar Dogwood Cam+rl swim-lira 61 47 8 1 5 55 90% Sslsaonbasy Rau spectabilis 80 46 3 6 25 49 61% Bulrush Sctrpers mirroca,pus 120 0 0 0 120 0 0% Slough Sedge Carex obnapta 85 6 0 0 79 6 7% Cattail Typha latifnlia 170 0 0 0 170 0 0% Table 2. Native Growth Protection Easement, Tract C Western Red Cedar Ihuja plicate 6 3 0 2 1 3 50% Douglas-Fir Puradotraga manziesii 16 7 3 4 2 10 62% Vine Maple Acer circinatum 15 12 0 0 3 6 Sa% Huckleberry y jccinUen Spit 12 4 0 0 8 4 33% Table 3. Native Growth Protection Easement. Tract E. Doeslas-Fir Psndottuga menxteati 16 10 1 2 2 11 69% vine Maple Acer circinaewn 15 15 0 0 0 15 100% Huckleberry Vacriniwn app. 12 10 0 2 0 10 83°r6 Wild Ross Rosa spp. 27 26 0 0 1 26 96% Recommendations: The project will be reviewed again after completion and submittal of the October monitoring report. Specific recommendations concerning follow-up actions which may be required will be provided at that time. It may be necen.Ary for some of the plant materials to be moved or for new plant materials to be installed in different locations. If you have any questions of if I can be of further assistance, call me at 789-9658_ I PACIFIC 3025-112th Avenue N.E. P.O.Box C-97304 APR 17 05 Bellevue,WA 98009-9304 MEMORANDUM TO: Margaret Clark, Senior Planner,City of Federal Way FROM: Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist,W&H Pacific DATE: April 14, 1995 RE: Field Inspection for Campus Glen,Tract"G" JOB NO: 3-420-0801 (1.26) This memo provides follow-up guidance on the Wetland Planting Plan for the Compensating Storage Pond(Tract"G") (1-19-94,modified 3-29-94)prepared by Terra Associates,Inc. and a summary of our field inspection completed on March 28, 1995. The field inspection was attended by Garret Munger of Terra Associates, Inc. and Eric Wells of Polygon Northwest. The following topics were discussed. Planting Plan for Tract"G" It was acknowledged by Garret Munger that the Wetland Planting Plan was modified to conform to the approved Tract "K" Detention Pond engineering drawings produced by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (2-1-94). Mr. Munger stated that the installed plant densities match or exceed the densities in the approved Wetland Planting Plan. It was acknowledged that an area of fill deposition located northeast of the installed compensating storage pond did not conform to design contours sited in the approved Barghausen engineering plans. No as-built drawings were available to complete an inventory of installed plant materials to confirm installed plant densities, or to assess as-built contour discrepancies. It is recommended that an as-built plan be produced documenting all installed plant materials, including an assessment of their existing vigor status (live, stressed, or dead). The as-built plan should include a post-construction topographic survey completed to a 1-foot contour resolution. The as-built can then be compared with the approved Barghausen plan to document observed elevation discrepancies. Plant material composition and densities can then be assessed to determine conformance to the goals outlined in the approved Wetland Planting Plan for the Compensating Storage Pond(Tract"G")(1-1-94,modified 3-29-94) Tract"G" Native Growth Protection Easement(NGPE)Inundation Julie Venn(Engineering Plans Reviewer,City of Federal Way)expressed concern on March 1, 1995 that prolonged inundation of black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) and red alder (Alnus rubra) located within the Tract "G" Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) may result in an increase in tree mortality. Sedimentation and water marks were observed during the March 28 field inspection confirming that stream bank overflow has impacted the hydrologic regime within the NGPE. A wetland (206)827-0220 Fax(206)822-5341 Planning•Engineering•Surveying•Landscape Design•Environmental Services �� • •4' I PACIFIC Field Inspection for Campus Glen,Tract"G"Memo April 14, 1995 Page 2 assessment for the NGPE was completed by Parametrix, Inc., and was submitted in a memorandum prepared for Glenn Byrd, January 15, 1992. The field investigation for the NGPE was completed on October 28, 1991 noting seasonal ponding water marks and stained leaves. It is the position of Garret Munger and Eric Wells that installation of the Tract"K"detention pond and the Tract"G"compensating storage pond has not affected hydrologic characteristics observed in the NGPE. They feel that any observed increase in inundation in this area is a result of increased hydrograph fluctuations in the adjacent stream, which is likely a result of upstream impervious surface development located beyond the Campus Glen project area. Black cottonwood and red alder are typical of riparian habitats and other poorly drained sites subject to annual flooding. However,sustained inundation throughout the growing season could result in anaerobic conditions of sufficient duration to increase mortality risk. It is recommended that a review of available hydrologic data for the adjacent stream be completed by the City of Federal Way to assess if a correlation exists between recent Campus Glen on-site development and the duration of inundation within the NGPE resulting from stream inflow. It is also recommended that observations of inundation levels within the NGPE be included in all mitigation monitoring field investigations and monitoring report submittals. 420-0601/CGLEN.mem r CITY OF f'""' • Eo 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 9>8003-66210 May 8, 1995 Mr. Eric Wells, Project Superintendent co\vie Polygon Northwest Company 4040 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Campus Glen Subdivision-- King County File No. S89P0114; Federal Way File No. ILA-90-PP08, Request for Wetland As-Built Plans Dear Mr. Wells: This is a follow-up to the March 28, 1995, site visit attended by you, Garet Munger of Terra Associates, Inc., Keith Fabing of Wilsey & Ham Pacific, and staff from the City of Federal Way. At that time, we discussed the need for As-built plans for the wetland planting areas in order for the city's Wetlands Biologist to determine if wetland plants had been installed in substantial compliance with the approved wetland planting plan prepared 1/19/94 and revised 3/29/94. By June 15, 1995, please provide us with an As-built plan for all areas required to be enhanced, pursuant to the approved wetland planting plan. The As-built plan must include the following: 1. List and depict all installed plantings by species. 2. Specify existing vigor status (live, stressed, or dead). 3. Provide a post-construction topographic survey completed to a one-foot contour resolution. With this information, the city's Wetland Biologist will compare the As-built plan with the approved engineering plans to document observed elevation discrepancies. In addition, plant material composition and densities can be assessed to determine conformance to the goals outlined in the approved wetland planting plan. Due to existing deviations in the field from the approved wetland planting plan, concerns about the functioning of the existing wetland located within Tract G, and the recommendations in the approved wetland planting plan (Note 8 of Construction Notes on Sheet 2 of 2), an as-built report must accompany the as-built plan. If the plant conditions in this report are acceptable in b Mr. Eric Wells May 8, 1995 Page 2 terms of plant vigor and survivability, 70 percent of the cost of nursery plantings ($1,848) plus $1,200 retained for construction inspection and consultation by your wetland biologist will be released to you for a total of$3,048. The remaining $792 will be retained by the city throughout the five-year monitoring period to cover plant replacement. The first monitoring report, as specified in the October 1994 "Agreement to Monitor Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan," must be submitted to the city by October 31, 1995, with subsequent reports being submitted within 12 months of the prior report. Please also be aware that prior to any wetland funds being released, the following must also be completed to the satisfaction of the city: 1. Regrade and stabilize Lots 61 and 62 and remove any slide material from the wetland and buffer in Tract G. Slides in these areas resulted in sediment being deposited within the wetland and wetland buffer in Tract G. Please submit a plan to Ron Garrow, Senior Development Engineer, for review and approval prior to commencing work. 2. Remove all debris and trash from all on-site wetlands and their buffers. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 661-4111. Sincerely, Margaret H. Clark, AICP Senior Planner c: City of Federal Way Kathy McClung, Land Use Administrator Ron Garrow, Senior Development Engineer Julie Venn, Engineering Plans Reviewer W & H Pacific Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist 3025-112th Avenue NE PO Box C-97034 Bellevue, WA 98009-9304 CMPUSC3.N\AS33UXLT TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences December 6, 1994 Project No. T-2521 Mr. Eric Wells Polygon Northwest Company 4030 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 Kirkland,Washington 98033 Subject: Wetland Mitigation Post Installation Monitoring Campus Glen Federal Way,Washington Dear Mr. Wells: As requested, we have examined the installation of the wetland and buffer plantings for the Campus Glen residential development presently under construction in Federal Way. We visited the site with Mr. Mark Howard of Landmark Landscaping and Maintenance on November 23, 1994 to review site conditions prior to installation of the wetland and buffer plantings. We completed a post-installation inspection on November 29, 1994 when the plantings had been completed. Plantings have been provided for three separate Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) tracts. These include Tracts C and E in which buffer enhancement plantings have been installed, and the compensating storage pond in Tract G for which wetland and buffer plantings have been provided. The buffer enhancement plantings in Tracts C and E have been installed in accordance with the intent of the Buffer Enhancement Plan. At the time of our site visit on November 23, 1994,there appeared to be variation from the recommended grading shown on the Planting Plan within the Compensating Storage Area. This required adjustment in the location of the plant materials to reflect anticipated water depths. These adjustments were made in the field and the plant materials have been installed. The plant materials as installed satisfy the intent of the wetland Planting Plan. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (206) 821-7777 Mr. Eric Wells December 6, 1994 We do not recommend additional work in the three NGPE Tracts at this time to ensure that the enhancement goals will be achieved at the end of the three year monitoring period. Plant materials should be examined again in the spring to determine viability and replacements should be made as may be required at that time. Other provisions for maintenance and continued monitoring as outlined in the Planting Plan over the three year monitoring period should be carried out to ensure achievement of project goals. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES, INC. -';\*)//41, Garet P. Munger Project Scientist Project No. T-2521 Page No. 2 From: RON GARROW To: ALEXISM, JUDYD, TAMS, CD_PLANNING_C Date: Monday, November 7, 1994 11: 20 am Subject: Release of Admin. Deposits and Cash Bonds The following procedures have been formulated for the release of cash bonds and administrative fee deposits. The releases are authorized by the Development Services Engineer in conjuction with Management Services. 1. The Eden account number from which the funds are to be refunded is to be confirmed with Tam S. (Generally 633-0000-000-239-10-003) 2 . Judy D. is to enter a Request For Check (RFC) into the invoicing system with the following information: - Reason for reimbursement - Name and address of person to which the funds are being reimbursed. - Eden Account Number from which funds are to be reimbursed. - $ amount of reimbursement. - Copy of original Quadrant receipt w/ Quadrant number. 3 . Judy will obtain approval under PG62 of the invoicing system from the Development Services Engineer. 4 . Judy will send the copy of the Quadrant receipt to Alexis and notify her of the issued RFC for processing of the check. 5 . Record of the transaction is to be made in the Bonds Data Base under the Community Development Applications Menu of the computer network. • If you have any questions regarding this procedure, please see me. Thanks. CC: Caryr POLYGON 1:1 NORTHWEST COMPANY September 22, 1994 Julie Venn City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Campus Glen Dear Julie: The following are items that need to be processed through your legal department. If legal can put together the documents then we can have these ready to submit when required. If you have any questions please call. 1. Maintenance of wetland planting Cost of planting $2,200 Maintenance Bond 5 years $2,200 x 120%x 30% = $792 30% is typical from maintenance bonds i.e.: Public Works bonds on roads etc. 2. Maintenance of Tree l3uiier along BPE Cost of Planting $3,200 $3,200 x 120% x 3-% = $1,152 3. Wetland Monitoring 5 years Cost $5,250 Assignment of funds for monitoring $5,250 with $1,000 reduction each year Sincerely, L � Eric H.G. Wells Project Manager EW:lp bi22/Ipivennllr 4030 Lake Washington Blvd.NE,Suite 201,Kirkland,WA 98033 (206)822-7700 Fax(206)827-4098 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Memorandum • DATE: August 5, 1994 TO: Margaret Clark, Senior Planner FROM: Eileen Robinson, Legal Assistant to Londi K. Lindell, Deputy City Attorney SUBJECT: Campus Glen Wetland Agreement and Assignment of Funds Margaret, attached are the originals of the following documents: 1) Agreement to Install and Maintain Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan, which has the Buffer Enhancement Plan and Wetland Planting Plan attached as EXHIBIT A. This document needs to be signed by Campus Glen Limited Partnership and dated. 2) Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond, which has a copy of the above Agreement attached as Exhibit 1. The legal description needs to be attached to Ex. 4 (the License) . This document needs to be signed by Campus Glen L.P. and Seattle Mortgage (and notary filled out for Seattle Mortgage) . Seattle Mortgage must fill in the account numbers in par. 2 of the Assignment, the Bank Acceptance form, and Exhibits 2 and 3 on the lines provided. PLEASE NOTE: the effective date in the first paragraph should be filled in, as well as the date in the Bank Acceptance and Exhibts 2 and 3. LONDI WILL SIGN APPROVAL OF ASSIGNMENT AFTER EVERYONE ELSE HAS SIGNED. 3) License THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION NEEDS TO BE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. The document also needs to be dated and notarized and then recorded by you with money from Campus Glen. It is $7 for 1st page and $1. 00 each additional page. 4) I am returning to you the original Restrictive Area Map - West Half. This isn't part of Exhibit A is it. Anyways, I don't think I need it for our files. If you have any questions, please give me a call. 1:\memos\Margc.cg FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR: Campus Glen Limited Partnership RECORDERS USE: MAIL TO: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 ATTN: Margaret Clark LICENSE The undersigned owner of certain real property located in Federal Way, Washington and legally described as follows: [Legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference] ("Property") hereby grants an irrevocable license to the City of Federal Way ("City") and the City's agents, employees, contractors or representatives to enter upon the Property to inspect the construction of improvements, the performance of work or to allow the City to perform any necessary maintenance or work, all pursuant to that certain Agreement to Install and Maintain Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan and Assignment of Funds of even date entered into between the City and the undersigned, which Agreements are incorporated herein by this reference. DATED this day of August, 1994 . CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner By: (signature) (printed name and title) STATE OF WASHINGTON ► ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that , is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as of BRENTVIEW, INC., which is General Partner of POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, which is General Partner of CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of August, 1994. (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. K;\DOCUMENT\CAMPSGLN.LIC My commission expires ORIGINAL • Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Permit #:King Co. File #S89P0114 Project: Campus Glen Federal Way File #ILA90-PPO8 Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and Account Amount: $10,140.00 BPA Transmission Line and Cash Deposit Amount: $ 507.00 approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Avenue S., if extended CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ASSIGNMENT OF FUNDS IN LIEU OF BOND THIS ASSIGNMENT("Assignment") is dated effective this day of August, 1994. The parties ("Parties") to this Assignment are the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City") and the undersigned owner or applicant ("Assignor"). A. The Assignor is required to perform certain work, and/or construct and maintain certain improvements at the above-referenced property address located in Federal Way, Washington ("Property") in connection with Assignor's application under the above-referenced permit numbers and in accordance with an Agreement to Install and Maintain Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan ("Agreement") entered into between the City and the Assignor of even date, which Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "1" and incorporated herein by this reference. B. The improvements will be constructed or the work will be performed in accordance with record drawings and approved plans on file with the City of Federal Way and specifically that certain Wetland Planting Plan and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., dated January 19, 1994 (as revised March 29, 1994) ("Plans"); C. The City has determined that Assignor must post security with the City pursuant to Sections 22-146 through 22-159 of the Federal Way City Code ("FWCC") as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended, to guarantee Assignor's performance of required maintenance or repair and Assignor's performance of construction of certain work or improvements pursuant to the Plans, as a condition of granting the permit. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1 . Amount of Account. Pursuant to Section 22-149 of the FWCC that portion of this Assignment which is in lieu of a performance bond, shall be equal to one hundred and twenty percent (120%) of the cost of the work or improvements and that portion of this Assignment which is in lieu of a maintenance bond, shall be equal to thirty percent (30%) of the cost of replacing materials consisting of nursery plantings.. 2. Assignment. Assignor does hereby assign, transfer and set over unto the City all right, title and interest in and to the sum of Ten Thousand One Hundred Forty Dollars and No/100 ($10,140.00) on deposit at the Queen Anne branch of Seattle Mortgage Company ("Bank"), under account No. ("Account"); said Account being in the name of the City, as principal with full power and authority to demand, collect and receive the Account and to give receipt and acquittance for the Account. ORIGINAL 3. Improvements. Assignor shall perform all work, improvements, maintenance and monitoring required pursuant to the Agreement and Plans, to the City's satisfaction. The maintenance and monitoring obligation shall continue for five (5)years from the completion date of the improvements, or such longer period as required by the FWCC or other applicable law, rule or regulation. 4. Release. Assignor agrees that the Account will be released to the City, on demand, with no other conditions of release. This Assignment may be terminated with the City's written consent, which consent shall not be granted until the City has determined that (i) all the improvements have been constructed and installed and all work and maintenance and monitoring performed to its satisfaction, in full compliance with the Agreement and Plans and all applicable local, state or federal law, and within the time period prescribed by the City, and (ii) Assignor has performed all its obligations under this Assignment. The City may release this Assignment as follows: (a) Partial Release. Upon completion of the improvements in compliance with the foregoing provisions, the City will release seventy per cent (70%) of the cost of the materials consisting of nursery plantings, which amount is equal to One Thousand Five Hundred Forty Dollars and No/100 ($1,540.00), by executing and delivering the Partial Release of Assignment attached hereto as Exhibit 2 to Assignor. (b) Full Release. Five (5) years after completion of the improvements and performance of the maintenance and monitoring program in compliance with the foregoing provisions, the City will release the remaining portion of the Account, in the amount of Eight Thousand Six Hundred Dollars and No/100 ($8,600.00), by executing and delivering the Full Release of Assignment attached hereto as Exhibit 3 to Assignor. 5. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, perform any of the necessary work in connection with the construction or completion of the improvements or performance of the maintenance or monitoring required by the Agreement and Plans. Upon demand, Assignor agrees to pay the City an amount equal to all of the City's costs and expenses in performing such work or the City shall be reimbursed its costs and expenses from the Account at the City's election. 6. Indemnification. Assignor agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Assignment, including without limitation, the City's performance of any maintenance, monitoring or other work or construction of the improvements pursuant to Section 5 herein. 7. Administrative Cash Deposit. In addition to the amount of this Assignment, Assignor agrees to pay a cash deposit to the City, pursuant to Section 22-151 of the FWCC, upon the execution of this Assignment equal to the following percentages of the amount of the Account: Amount of Account Amount of Cash Deposit Up to $20,000 5% of Account (minimum $100) -2- $20,001 - $50,000 4% of Account $50,001 - $100,000 3% of Account $100,001 and up 2-1/2% of Account The cash deposit may be used by the City to cover its actual expenses in administering this Assignment and, if necessary, collecting and using the proceeds from the Account. 8. Remedies Cumulative. No remedy provided for by this Assignment shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to every other remedy available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. Assignor agrees that its liability under this Assignment is not limited to the amount of the Account. 9. License. The Assignor hereby grants to the City the irrevocable license and right to enter the Property in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "4", to inspect such work and install or maintain the required mitigation pursuant to the conditions of preliminary plat approval and the Plans, as the City deems necessary, and at the City's election. The Assignor shall record such license with the King County Department of Records immediately upon the execution of this Assignment, at Assignor's expense. 10. General Provisions. This Assignment may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the Parties. Any provision of this Assignment which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default shall not waive such breach or default. This Assignment may not be assigned by either Party without the other Party's written consent. This Assignment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties' successors in interest. In the event of any dispute between the Parties regarding this Assignment, each Party shall pay its own attorney fees and costs. Each person executing this Assignment represents that he or she is authorized to execute this Assignment on behalf of their respective entity. Time is of the essence. CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: Approved as to Form (signature) (printed name and title) Carolyn A. Lake, City Attorney 4040 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 K:ID000MEN11CAMPSGLN.ASF Kirkland, WA 98033 08-04-94 (206) 822-7700 -3- BANK ACCEPTANCE The undersigned financial institution ("Bank") hereby accepts that certain Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond provided to the City of Federal Way ("City") by Campus Glen Limited Partnership ("Assignor") dated providing for Assignor's assignment to the City of all right, title and interest in and to the sum of Ten Thousand One Hundred Forty Dollars and no/100 ($10,140.00)on deposit at the Queen Anne branch, under account no. ("Account"), payment of which shall be made upon demand by the City with no other conditions of release of the Account. The Bank agrees to hold the Account, without deduction or withdrawal, until it receives a written release of this Assignment from the City. The Bank acknowledges that it has no duty to evaluate any dispute which may exist between the City and Assignor regarding the Account and shall not interplead or in any manner delay payment of the Account to the City, upon its demand. The Bank hereby agrees to bind itself, and its heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, jointly and severally. SEATTLE MORTGAGE COMPANY BY: Signature of Authorized Personnel (Signature to be notarized below) ITS: (Title) (ADDRESS) (PHONE) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. [BANK NOTARY] COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me , to me known to be the of , the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. GIVEN my hand and official seal hereto affixed this day of , 1 9_. (typed or printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires DyEXHIBIT 1 Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Project: Campus Glen Permit No:.King Co. File #S89P0114/ Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and ILA90-PP08 BPA Transmission Line and approxi- mately 8th Ave. S. & 4th Ave. S., if extended AGREEMENT TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN WETLAND AND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN Basis for Agreement A. The undersigned Principal applied to King County ("County") under the Project name, Campus Glen ("Project") and under BALD File No. S89P0114 and to the City of Federal Way ("City") under Permit No. ILA90-PP08 to construct certain improvements or perform work at certain real property previously located in King County, State of Washington, and after the date of the City's incorporation, located within the city limits of Federal Way, having an address more commonly known as between S. 328th St. and BPA Transmission Line and approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Ave. S. , if extended. ("Property") ; B. The City determined that a mitigation plan must be installed and maintained as a condition of preliminary plat approval granted August 17, 1993 pursuant to City of Federal Way Resolution No. 93-149; and C. The City will grant final permit approval only if the Principal agrees to install and maintain the mitigating measures set forth in the preliminary plat approval as more particularly described in that certain Wetland Planting Plan and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. , dated January 19, 1994 (Revised March 29, 1994) , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference ("Plan") . Terms of the Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, the Principal hereby agrees and binds itself, and its legal representatives, successors, and assigns, as follows: 1. Installation. Prior to final plat approval, but no later than December 10, 1994, the Principal shall complete all required mitigating measures in full compliance with the conditions of preliminary plat approval and the Plan, including any approved amendments thereto, and in conformance with accepted planting practice, in good soil with adequate water available, which improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City. 2 . Notice. The Principal shall notify the City in writing upon completion of all installation as described in the Plan. At such time, the Principal shall further provide, in writing, to the City, the dates the Principal will commence the mitigation observation and the dates it will submit each of the monitoring observation reports pursuant to Section 4 herein and as required by the Plan. 3 . Bond/Assignment of Funds. The Principal shall provide to the City a Performance/Maintenance Bond, Assignment of Funds, or other security in form and content acceptable to the City to guarantee the Principal's performance of the installation and maintenance of the mitigation measures pursuant to this Agreement, and the Plan, to the City's satisfaction. 4. Maintenance. The Principal shall maintain the improvements installed under the Plan so as to create healthy growing conditions for a period of five (5) years commencing on the date of completion of all installation described in the Plan. The Principal shall submit a monitoring report on the status with as-built drawings within one (1) year after installation and subsequent monitoring reports for the following years shall be submitted within twelve (12) months of submission of the prior report. While maintenance may result in a partial release of any bond or other security posted by the Principal, at the City's election, the Principal recognizes its continuing duty to maintain the Plan as required by the King County Code or other applicable federal, state or local law. 5. Contingency Plan. If the Project has not met its performance standards set forth in the Plan by the end of the five (5) year monitoring period, the Principal is responsible for the preparation and implementation of a contingency plan to remedy the situation, in form acceptable to the City. 6. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, install the improvements or perform the maintenance and monitoring as required by this Agreement and the Plan, and upon demand, the Principal shall pay the City an amount equal to its costs and expenses in performing such installation, maintenance and/or monitoring or the City shall be reimbursed its costs and expenses pursuant to any bond posted by the Principal, at the City's election. 7. Indemnification. Principal agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Agreement, including without limitation, the City's performance of any maintenance or other work or construction of the improvements pursuant to Section 6 herein. 8. Remedies not Exclusive. No remedy provided for by this Agreement or any bond or other security posted by Principal shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to -2- every other remedy available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. 9. General Provisions. This Agreement may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the parties. Any provisions of this Agreement which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default by the Principal shall not waive such breach or default. Each party shall pay its own attorney's fees and costs in connection with any lawsuit or other action relating to this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Principal's successors in interest, heirs and assigns. Time is of the essence. DATED effective this day of August, 1994. PRINCIPAL: CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC. , Its General Partner By: (signature) (printed name and title) 4040 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 (206) 822-7700 K:\DOCUMENT\CAMSGLN.WL 08-04-94 -3- • EXHIBIT 2 PARTIAL RELEASE OF ASSIGNMENT The undersigned hereby acknowledges that a portion of the conditions set forth in that Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond ("Assignment") provided to the City of Federal Way ("City") by Campus Glen Limited Partnership ("Assignor") dated for Campus Glen, King Co. Permit#S89P01 14/ILA90-PP08have been satisfied and hereby authorizes the release of an amount equal to One Thousand Five Hundred Forty Dollars and no/100 ($1,540.00) from account number ("Account") in the Queen Anne Branch of Seattle Mortgage Company ("Bank"). The remaining funds equalling thirty percent (30%) of the cost of the work or improvements shall be held by the Bank in the Account pursuant to the terms of the Assignment for a period of five (5) years as security for Assignor's performance of all maintenance and monitoring for the project described therein and as a guarantee against defective materials or workmanship in the construction and maintenance of such improvements. DATED this day of , 19_. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: (Name, Title) SURVEY DATA CORRECTED LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM BASELINE ENGNEERNO NC. That portion of the North half of the Southwest quarter and that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and that portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, all in Section 17,, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying within the parcel described in a quit claim deed recorded under Recording No. 9308121901 and surveyed and 'legally described by Terrell C. Ferguson, P.L.S., of Baseline Engineering Inc., in records of survey recorded in Volume 94 of Surveys at pages 141 and 141a and Volume 95 of Surveys at pages 116 and 116a, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of said Section 17; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said Section 17, a distance of 1,317.78 feet; THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East, a distance of 42.00 feet; THENCE South 88' 49' 37" East, a distance of 686.72 feet to the Northwest corner of King County Short Plat No. 580108 per Recording No. 8104300739, records of King County; Washington; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 1,112.24 feet to a point on the Southerly right—of—way line of South 328th Street; THENCE South 75' 27' 16" West along said Southerly right—of—way line, a distance of 25.00 feet to the Northwest corner of the Plat of West Highlands Division No. 1, as recorded in Volume 127 of Plots, pages 26 through 28. records of King County, Washington; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said plat, a distance of 484.39 feet to the South line of said plat; THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East along the South line of said plat. a distance of 14.69 feet to a tangent curve concave to the North having a radius of 1,100.00 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 10' 24' 04", an arc distance of 199.69 feet to the Northeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142. per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County, Washington, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said curve to the left having a radius of 1,100.00 feet, through a central angle of 76' 34' 24", an arc distance of 1,470.10 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of King County Short Plot No. 580108, per Recording No. 8104300739, records of King County, Washington; THENCE South 86' 34' 16" East along the South line of Campus Green II, a condominium as recorded in Volume 53 of Condominiums at pages 96 through 97, records of King County, Washington. a distance of 369.70 feet to the West line of the Plat of Heritage West, as recorded in Volume 91 of Plots, pages 11 and 12, records of King County. Washington; THENCE South 37 34' 05" East along the West line of said plot, a distance of 239.16 feet to an angle point in said West line; THENCE South 36' 10' 33" East continuing along the West line of said plat, a distance of 157.41 feet to an angle point in said West line of said plat; THENCE South 23' 28' 12" West continuing along the West line of said plat. a distance of 105.00 feet to the Southerly line of South 327th Street as shown in said Plat of Heritage West, and a point of curvature with a tangent curve concave to the Northeast whose radius point bears North 23' 28' 12" East and is 380.00 feet distant; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the •left through a central angle of 47 17' 45", an arc distance of 280.52 feet to on angle point on said Southerly line of South 327th Street; THENCE South 18' 49' 33" East along the Westerly line of said South 327th Street and the Westerly line of Lot 61 of said Plat of Heritage West, a distance of 181.32 feet to the Northwesterly margin line of Bonneville Power Association Transmission Line right—of—way, Tacoma—Grand Coulee No. 1 recorded under Recording Nos. 3131454, 3186542, 3252183, 4201227, 4660593, 5151465, and 5204177; THENCE South 57 58' 44" West along said Northwesterly margin line, a distance of 1,803.52 feet to the Southeast corner of King County Short Plot No. 278142 per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County, Washington; THENCE North 37 01' 16" West along the East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 516.50 feet to an angle point in said East line; THENCE North 09' 21' 29" West continuing along said East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 299.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO easements, covenants, and restrictions of record. EXHIBIT 3 FULL RELEASE OF ASSIGNMENT/LICENSE Pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond ("Assignment") provided to the City of Federal Way ("City") by Campus Glen Limited Partnership ("Assignor") dated for Campus Glen, King Co. Permit#S89P0114/ILA90-PPO„the City hereby acknowledges that the five (5)year maintenance and monitoring period has expired,that the work or improvements covered by the Assignment have been completed to the City's satisfaction and that the City is not aware of any defect in workmanship or materials. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby releases the sum of Eight Thousand Six Hundred Dollars and No/100 ($8,600.00)from account number in the Queen Anne Branch of Seattle Mortgage Company ("Bank"). The undersigned further releases all right, title and interest granted to the undersigned by reason of a certain License Agreement recorded under King County Recording No. ("License Agreement") and acknowledges that all obligations and rights contained in the License Agreement are hereby terminated. DATED this day of , 19 . CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: (Name, Title) EXHIBIT 4 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR: Campus Glen Limited Partnership RECORDERS USE: MAIL TO: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 ATTN: Margaret Clark LICENSE The undersigned owner of certain real property located in Federal Way, Washington and legally described as follows: [Legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference] ("Property") hereby grants an irrevocable license to the City of Federal Way ("City") and the City's agents, employees, contractors or representatives to enter upon the Property to inspect the construction of improvements, the performance of work or to allow the City to perform any necessary maintenance or work, all pursuant to that certain Agreement to Install and Maintain Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan and Assignment of Funds of even date entered into between the City and the undersigned, which Agreements are incorporated herein by this reference. DATED this day of August, 1994 . CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner By: (signature) (printed name and title) STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that , is the person who appeared before me,and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument,on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as of BRENTVIEW, INC., which is General Partner of POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, which is General Partner of CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of August, 1994. (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires • SURVEY DATA CORRECTED LEGAL DESCRI 11ON FROM BASELINE ENGINEERING NC. That portion of the North half of the Southwest quarter and that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and that portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, all in Section 17,, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying within the parcel described in a quit claim deed recorded under Recording No. 930812/901 and surveyed and Ilegally described by Terrell C. Ferguson, P.L.S., of Baseline Engineering Inc., in records of survey recorded in Volume 94 of Surveys at pages 141 and 141a and Volume 95 of Surveys at pages 116 and 116a, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of said Section 17; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said Section 17, a distance of 1,317.78 feet; THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East, a distance of 42.00 feet; THENCE South 88' 49' 37" East, a distance of 686.72 feet to the Northwest corner of King County Short Plat No. 580108 per Recording No. 8104300739, records of King County; Washington; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 1,112.24 feet to a point on the Southerly right—of—way line of South 328th Street; THENCE South 75' 27' 16" West along said Southerly right—of—way line, a distance of 25.00 feet to the Northwest corner of the Plat of West Highlands Division No. 1, as recorded in Volume 127 of Plats, pages 26 through 28, records of King County, Washington; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said plat, a distance of 484.39 feet to the South line of said plat; • THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East along the South line of said plat. .a distance of 14.69 feet to a tangent curve concave to the North having a radius of 1,100.00 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 10' 24' 04", an arc distance of 199.69 feet to the Northeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142, per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County, Washington, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said curve to the left having a radius of 1,100.00 feet, through a central angle of 76' 34' 24", an arc distance of 1,470.10 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of King County Short Plat No. 580108, per Recording No. 8104300739, records of King County. Washington; THENCE South 86' 34' 16" East along the South line of Campus Green II, a condominium as recorded in Volume 53 of Condominiums at pages 96 through 97, records of King County, Washington, a distance of 369.70 feet to the West line of the Plat of Heritage West, as recorded in Volume 91 of Plats, pages 11 and 12, records of King County, Washington; THENCE South 32' 34' 05" East along the West line of said plat, a distance of 239.16 feet to an angle point in said West line; THENCE South 36' 10' 33" East continuing along the West line of said plat, a distance of 157.41 feet to an angle point in said West line of said plat; THENCE South 23' 28' 12" West continuing along the West line of said plat, a distance of 105.00 feet to the Southerly line of South 327th Street as shown in said Plat of Heritage West, and a point of curvature with a tangent curve concave to the Northeast whose radius point bears North 23' 28' 12" East and is 380.00 feet distant; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 42' 17' 45", an arc distance of 280.52 feet to an angle point on said Southerly line of South 327th Street; THENCE South 18' 49' 33" East along the Westerly line of said South 327th Street and the Westerly line of Lot 61 of said Plat of Heritage West, a distance of 181.32 feet to the Northwesterly margin line of Bonneville Power Association Transmission Line right—of—way, Tacoma—Grand Coulee No. 1 recorded under Recording Nos. 3131454, 3186542, 3252183, 4201227, 4660593, 5151465, and 5204177; THENCE South 52' 58' 44" West along said Northwesterly margin line, a distance of 1,803.52 feet to the Southeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142 per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County, Washington; THENCE North 37' 01' 16" West alon9 the East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 516.50 feet to an angle, point in said East line; THENCE North 09' 21' 29" West continuing along said East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 299.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO easements, covenants, and restrictions of record. • • Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Project: Campus Glen Permit No: King Co. File #S89P0114/ Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and ILA90-PPO8 BPA Transmission Line and approxi- mately 8th Ave. S. & 4th Ave. S., if extended AGREEMENT TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN WETLAND AND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN Basis for Agreement A. The undersigned Principal applied to King County ("County") under the Project name, Campus Glen ("Project") and under BALD File No. S89P0114 and to the City of Federal Way ("City") under Permit No. ILA90-PPO8 to construct certain improvements or perform work at certain real property previously located in King County, State of Washington, and after the date of the City's incorporation, located within the city limits of Federal Way, having an address more commonly known as between S. 328th St. and BPA Transmission Line and approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Ave. S. , if extended. ("Property") ; B. The City determined that a mitigation plan must be installed and maintained as a condition of preliminary plat approval granted August 17, 1993 pursuant to City of Federal Way Resolution No. 93-149; and C. The City will grant final permit approval only if the Principal agrees to install and maintain the mitigating measures set forth in the preliminary plat approval as more particularly described in that certain Wetland Planting Plan and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. , dated January 19, 1994 (Revised March 29, 1994) , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference ("Plan") . Terms of the Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, the Principal hereby agrees and binds itself, and its legal representatives, successors, and assigns, as follows: 1. /Installation. Prior to final plat approval, but no later than December ;I?, 1994, the Principal shall complete all required mitigating measures in full compliance with the conditions of preliminary plat approval and the Plan, including any approved amendments thereto, and in conformance with accepted planting practice, in good soil with adequate water available, which improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City. ORIGINAL 2. Notice. The Principal shall notify the City in writing upon completion of all installation as described in the Plan. At such time, the Principal shall further provide, in writing, to the City, the dates the Principal will commence the mitigation observation and the dates it will submit each of the monitoring observation reports pursuant to Section 4 herein and as required by the Plan. 3. Bond/Assignment of Funds. The Principal shall provide to the City a Performance/Maintenance Bond, Assignment of Funds, or other security in form and content acceptable to the City to guarantee the Principal's performance of the installation and maintenance of the mitigation measures pursuant to this Agreement, and the Plan, to the City's satisfaction. 4. Maintenance. The Principal shall maintain the improvements installed under the Plan so as to create healthy growing conditions for a period of five (5) years commencing on the date of completion of all. installation described in the Plan. The Principal shall submit a monitoring report on the status with as-built drawings within one (1) year after installation and subsequent monitoring reports for the following years shall be submitted within twelve (12) months of submission of the prior report. While maintenance may result in a partial release of any bond or other security posted by the Principal, at the City's election, the Principal recognizes its continuing duty to maintain the Plan as required by the King County Code or other applicable federal, state or local law. 5. Contingency Plan. If the Project has not met its performance standards set forth in the Plan by the end of the five (5) year monitoring period, the Principal is responsible for the preparation and implementation of a contingency plan to remedy the situation, in form acceptable to the City. 6. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, install the improvements or perform the maintenance and monitoring as required by this Agreement and the Plan, and upon demand, the Principal shall pay the City an amount equal to its costs and expenses in performing such installation, maintenance and/or monitoring or the City shall be reimbursed its costs and expenses pursuant to any bond posted by the Principal, at the City's election. 7. Indemnification. Principal agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Agreement, including without limitation, the City's performance of any maintenance or other work or construction of the improvements pursuant to Section 6 herein. 8. Remedies not Exclusive. No remedy provided for by this Agreement or any bond or other security posted by Principal shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to -2- every other remedy available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. 9. General Provisions. This Agreement may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the parties. Any provisions of this Agreement which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default by the Principal shall not waive such breach or default. Each party shall pay its own attorney's fees and costs in connection with any lawsuit or other action relating to this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Principal's successors in interest, heirs and assigns. Time is of the essence. DATED effective this day of August, 1994 . PRINCIPAL: CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC. , Its General Partner By: (signature) (printed name and title) 4040 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 (206) 822-7700 K:\DOCUMENT\CAMSGLN.WL 08-04-94 -3- CITY OF• F� (206)661-4000 FW 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 October 13, 1994 Mr. Gary Young, Senior Vice-President Polygon Northwest Company 4040 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 201 tl4eS4°.<(/ Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Campus Glen Subdivision King County File No. S89P0114; Federal Way File No. ILA-90-PPO8 Dear Mr. Young: As you are aware, in July 1994, your contractor, Thomas Construction, moved approximately 200 cubic yards of earth material on to the BPA easement (City of Federal Way property), located to the south of the Campus Glen plat. The area in which the material was deposited is part of a larger area to be improved as part of the Federal Way Corridor Trail. Construction is presently underway in this area. As previously discussed over the telephone, Polygon was required to remove the fill and restore the area to as close a condition as possible to its original state. The fill has since been removed. In order to restore this area, the following vegetation must be planted by October 31, 1994: 1. Kinnickinnick, one gallon, 36" on center, with triangular spacing. 2. Salal, one gallon, 24" on center, with triangular spacing 3. Vine Maple, 2" caliper, 12 feet, on center, with triangular spacing. Please call for an inspection once the planting is completed.Upon a satisfactory inspection, you will be required to provide the city with as-bunts for the planting and a one-year,guarantee on plant survival. In lieu of providing the city.,:with a separate guarantee,and with your concurrence submitted to the cityshall be modified to include.this 'Works-related improvements recently provided below, the two-year maintenancePublic bond fori planting guarantee. f Mr. Gary Young October 13, 1994 Page 2 Please sign below if you agree to the modification of the maintenance bond agreement to cover guarantee of said planting. The effective date of this agreement is the date of signature by the property owner, below; the original document of which must be returned to the city. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT, UNDERSTANDING, AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. Signature Date Should you have any questions, please contact Margaret Clark, at 661-4111. Sincerely, *j6ti4tkl" MLttAdtl- Kathy McClung Land Use Administrator c: City of Federal Way Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner Ron Garrow, Senior Development Engineer Ken Miller,Street Systems Manager Barbara Simpson, Park Planner CMPUSG[N\BPA QG$Hays CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES o i e" August 16, 1994 Zso '1; � i : 'NG ENGINF'F� Margaret Clark Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Revised Revegetation Plan for the Bonneville Power Line Buffer Located at Campus Glen Our Job No. 4558 Dear Margaret: Pursuant to our meeting of August 2, and follow up telephone conversation, enclosed are revised Landscape Improvement plans for Campus Glen. The revisions incorporate redesign of the Bonneville Power Transmission line buffer. The plan includes a combination of Douglas fir and western red cedar of 6-foot height, spaced at approximately 20 feet on-center along the entire 20-foot buffer strip. Installation of the trees would occur in the late fall/early winter of 1994. The above standards were arrived at by mutual agreement between the City, Polygon Northwest, and Bonneville Power administration. These standards supersede the pre-existing subdivision conditions. Please contact me if you should have any questions or require any additional information regarding this matter. Sincerely, C H. Bruce McCrory Landscape Architect HBM/kr/sdc 4558C.039 enc: As Noted cc: Gary Young, Polygon Northwest Company (w/enc) Hal P. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (206)251-6222 (206)251-8782 FAX "M PACIFIC COMMUNITY ELOPfd NT D pARTMENT 3025-112th Avenue N.E.P. APR 20 1,7'f O.Box C-97304 R Bellevue,WA 98009-9304 MEMORANDUM TO: Margaret Clark, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Susan Meyer, Wetland Ecologist, W&H Pacific SoYei DATE: April 19, 1994 RE: Final Wetland Mitigation Plan - Campus Glen Job No: 3-420-0601-1.26 This memo provides written confirmation that the final wetland mitigation plan for Campus Glen meets the requirements outlined in the Conditions of Preliminary Plat Approval. The plan also satifies the requirements of the Federal Way City Code and should provide adequate compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts from the proposed development. If you have any questions, please call me at 828-2857. 420-0601/camGlMit.fin (206)827-0220 Fax(206)822-5341 Planning•Engineering•Surveying•Landscape Design•Environmental Services 0 (.5- Jtri "L`—`1—act.sje CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM 4 March 9, 1994 , �" r, �' Qr./D.4— TO: Hal Grubb, P.E., Senior Project Engineer, Barghausen Consulting Engineer Tel #: (206) 251-6222 Fax #: (206) 251-8782 FROM: Margaret H. Clark, Senior Planner, Tel # (206) 661-4111 Jeff Sharp, Engineering Plans Reviewer, Tel # (206) 661-4125 SUBJECT: Engineering Review Comments -- Preliminary Plat of Campus Glen; Interlocal Agreement "A" list Item, King County File No. S89P0114, Federal Way File No.ILA-90-PPO8 5 � c4 The following is the City's review comments on the Campus Glen engineering plans. For convenience, the conditions of preliminary plat approval have been listed. We have made comments after each condition. If the condition is one that must be addressed as part of '1 4 engineering review, we have stated whether the condition has been met, or what still needs to 41 be done to comply. If the condition is not applicable at this time, it has been so noted. PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS N 1. The plat shall comply with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code (King County Subdivision Ordinance). To be determined at the final plat stage. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952 (Exhibit AE) except as modified for the City of Federal Way. To be done at the final plat stage. 3. The area and dimensions of all lots shall meet the minimum requirements of the S-R zone classification. Compliance with the conditions of preliminary plat approval may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the " •41trr {ni d sf UtGr 1 i 'rA .. � � c E✓e .4. ', _, j'"'�,' J �kt�t a� Gar+ a . � (3 ; V{ e .41r,p•, v4--) ( ,.. `4 preliminary approved plat. This requirement appears to have been met, however calculations to show how the lots meet the lot averaging provisions of the King County code must be provided at the final plat stage. 4. The applicant must obtain the approval of the City of Federal Way for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards. This condition will be met once the final construction drawings for the water system have been approved by the Federal Way Water and Sewer District and the Federal Way Fire Department has reviewed and approved the location of fire hydrants as part of the water plan approval process by the Federal Way Water and Sewer District. Adequacy of fire flow will be determined at the time that building permits are applied for. 5. A Developer Extension Agreement must be entered into between the applicant and the Federal Way Water and Sewer District for the water system. As part of the design of the water system, looping of the new system to existing mainlines may be required to provide circulation and maintenance enhancements, and piping shall extend to far edges of the property in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Way Water and Sewer District. To be met prior to final plat approval. The applicant needs to work with the Water and Sewer District on this requirement. 6. A Developer Extension Agreement must be entered into between the applicant and the Federal Way Water and Sewer District for the sewer system. As part of the agreement, the applicant will be required to extend sewer mains to the far edges of the property where property can be served, and a developer extension agreement and off-site easement and construction is also required to construct off-site utilities and to obtain services. To be met prior to final plat approval. The applicant needs to work with the Water and Sewer District on this requirement. 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04 and storm drainage requirements and guidelines as established by King County Surface Water Management in effect at the time of preliminary plat application. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. The following conditions represent portions of the Code and requirements and shall apply to all plats: a. Federal Way Public Works Department approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. 2 b. A separate Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) plan for this project shall be submitted with the drainage and roadway plans. The plan shall show the limits of the area to be cleared (limits of clearing) during construction of roads and the installation of drainage improvements and utilities, and provide a schedule of construction (construction sequence). The plans shall include provisions for protecting exposed soils from weathering by wind or rain by covering piles of soil with tarp. Due to potential erosion hazard, clearing shall be limited to those areas required for construction of roadways and utilities during the months listed under SEPA condition #4. Prior to any clearing or grading, a boundary delineation acceptable to the City of Federal Way shall be provided on the site between lots and any areas designated as a NGPE. Said boundary delineation shall remain in place until a dwelling is constructed on the lot or ownership transferred to the first owner-occupant at which time a five foot, see-through, fence shall be installed. c. Prior to recording of the final plat, those portions of the retention/detention facilities necessary to control the flows discharging from the site shall be constructed and operational. d. Oil/water separation facilities shall be provided at each point of permanent storm drainage release from the site to prevent contaminants from entering the natural drainage features, both off-site and in the close depression area. In addition to oil/water separators, the applicant is required to provide biofiltration prior to discharge of stormwater. Such biofiltration includes 200 feet of broad, flat-bottom, grass-lined swales or equivalent, the design of which shall be in conformance with generally accepted practices. A 15-foot gravel access shall be provided along the entire length of each biofiltration swale for maintenance. e. Drainage outlets (stub-outs) shall be provided for each individual lot, except for those lots approved for infiltration by the City of Federal Way. Stub-outs shall be shown on the engineered plans and shall conform to the following: 1) Each outlet shall be suitably located at the lowest elevation on the lot, so as to service all future roof downspouts and footing drains, driveways, yard drains, and any other surface or subsurface drains necessary to render the lots suitable for their intended use. Each outlet shall have free-flowing, positive drainage to an approved stormwater conveyance system or to an approved outfall location. 3 2) Outlets on each lot shall be located with a five-foot-high, 2"x4" stake marked "storm". The stub-out shall extend above surface level, be visible and be secured to the stake. 3) Pipe material shall conform with underdrain specifications described in KCRS 7.04 and, if non-metallic,the pipe shall contain wire or other acceptable feature detectable from the surface. 4) Drainage easements are required for drainage systems designed to convey flows through more than one lot. 5) All individual stub-outs shall be privately owned and maintained by the lot home owner. f. In some cases, on-site stormwater infiltration systems may be suitable for use on individual lots depending on soil conditions. The system shall be used where suitable. To determine the suitability of the soil for infiltration systems, a soils report that includes percolation tests and a soil log taken at 6-foot minimum depth shall be submitted by a professional engineer, or soil specialist prior to building permit issuance for each lot. This shall include, at a minimum, information on soil texture, depth to seasonal high water and the occurrence of mottling and impervious layers. If the soils report is approved, an infiltration system shall be installed at the time of the building permit. A note to this effect shall be placed on the face of the final plat map. g. A Level II downstream drainage analysis shall be included with the drainage plan. This analysis must extend for a minimum distance of 1/4 mile from the point of release of each flow discharging from the site. The analysis must address any existing problems with flooding,capacity, overtopping,scouring, sloughing, erosion or sedimentation of any drainage facility, whether natural or man-made. Probable impacts due to construction of the project must also be addressed with respect to these same concerns. Where this analysis reveals a more restrictive situation, more stringent drainage controls, than would otherwise be necessary for a project of this type, may be required. These controls may include additional on-site rate and/or volume controls, off-site improvements, or a combination of both. Any off-site improvements will require the approval of all affected property owners. h. Current standard notes and Erosion Sedimentary Control (ESC) notes, as established by the City of Federal Way Public Works Department, shall be placed on the engineered plans. The following note shall be placed on the face of the final plat map: 4 "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces, such as patios and driveways, shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings on file with the City of Federal Way Public Works Department under Project#ILA- 90-0008-SUB. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the fmal building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed prior to certificate of occupancy and shall comply with plans on file. See the attached redlined civil plans and hydraulic report. 8. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 8041 (1987 King County Road Standards). This condition has been met based on the current design of the roadway and design plans. 9. All roads shall be improved with vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalks. All roads show a design of vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalks throughout the plat. 10. a. All right-of-ways, roads, and sidewalks shall be dedicated to the public upon recording of the final plat. Appropriate dedication language per King County Motion No. 5952 shall be placed on the face of the final plat. b. An addendum to the current geotechnical report shall be prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer to address recommended designs for the proposed roadways. The report shall detail the soil and groundwater conditions. The recommendations to ensure integrity of future roadways shall be subject to review and approval by the City of Federal Way. A soils report, submitted as part of the drainage report, has been prepared which discusses the subsurface soils as well as pavement design. 11. All roads will be constructed to King County full street improvements (no half- streets). The following lists the classification of each: a. Road A - Neighborhood Collector b. Road B - Subaccess 5 c. Road C - Subaccess d. Road D - Minor Access e. Road E - Subaccess f. Road F - Minor Access Note: If paved width of minor access or subaccess streets are to be less than 28 feet, each lot shall provide for four off-street parking stalls per King County King County Road Standards Section 2.03 note #8). The roads have been designed in conformance with these standards. 12. Planter islands within any cul-de-sac shall be landscaped to the approval of the City of Federal Way. The planter islands shall also be permanently maintained by the abutting lot owners. This shall be stated on the face of the final plat. There are no planter islands shown on the engineering drawings, therefore, this condition does not apply. 13. Any fencing constructed along any street shall include a landscaped area placed along the perimeter of each fence. This shall be placed on the face of the plat prior to final plat recording. Adjacent property owners shall be responsible for the continued maintenance of subject landscaping. Based on the submitted engineering plan, no fencing has been proposed along public streets. 14. At the time of recording of the final plat, any open space areas, including any areas designated as a NGPE shall be dedicated as separate tracts. In order to provide for its ownership and continued maintenance, said tracts shall be either dedicated to the City of Federal Way or to a Homeowners Association or other workable organization. The determination as to ownership shall be made by the City of Federal Way prior to recording of the final plat. Native Growth Protection Areas have been shown as separate tracts on the construction drawings. Refer to comments under SEPA Condition No. 7(c). Determination as to their ownership will be done at the final plat stage. 15. If a Homeowners Association is formed, the Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions shall be reviewed by the City of Federal Way to ensure that adequate provisions are made for ownership and maintenance of common areas. To be addressed at the final plat stage. 6 16. Easements shall be provided for all utilities not located within public rights-of-way. The width of the easements for the individual utilities shall be approved by the respective utility provider. These easements shall be clearly labelled on the face of the final plat. To be addressed at the final plat stage. 17. A 10 foot utility easement shall be provided along the front 10 feet of all lots and tracts adjacent to the proposed streets. The following statement shall be noted on the face of the final plat: "Easement Reservations An easement is hereby reserved for and granted to any public utility and their respective successors and assigns, under and upon the front ten feet parallel with and adjoining the street frontage of all lots and tracts in which to install, lay, construct, renew, operate and maintain underground pipe, conduit, cables and wires with necessary facilities and other equipment for the purpose of serving this subdivision and other property with utility service, together with the right to enter upon the lots at all times for the purposes herein stated. These easements entered upon for these purposes shall be restored as near as possible to their original condition. No utility lines shall be placed or permitted to be placed upon any lot unless the same shall be underground or in conduit attached to a building." To be addressed at the final plat stage. 18. The applicant shall participate with the City in developing and financing school bus crosswalks in the area. The exact location of these crosswalks shall be determined by the City of Federal Way and the Federal Way School District. The applicant should approach the District at this time to determine whether school crosswalks are desired in this area. 19. A geotechnical/soils report shall be submitted along with each building permit application for any lots containing slopes in excess of 20%. This condition shall be placed on the face of the plat prior to final plat recording. This condition will be addressed at the final plat stage and at the time of building permit application for each lot. 20. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay a pro-rata share contribution, in the amount of $3,100 towards the improvement of South 320th Street and 1st Avenue South intersection. 7 I �3s/L `. A 1—", To be done at the final plat stage. 21. The applicant shall adhere to the conditions of mitigation for the issuance of the SEPA MDNS dated March 12, 1993 for this project. SEPA Conditions 1. All development activities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with recommendations and conclusions described on pages 3-6 of the "Geotechnical Evaluation of the Proposed Campus Glen Estates" dated January 7, 1992, and prepared by Pacific Testing Laboratories for the proposed development. Supplemental geotechnical analysis and recommendations may be required by the Public Works Director or Building Official for development activities located within or near sensitive areas as part of preliminary plat review. Site improvements have been designed in accordance with the Geotechnical Evaluation. 2. All proposed development shall be subject to King County Administrative C act. So 1 uidelines Building Setbacks From Hazardous Slopes on Plats and Short Ran d g_C P R w Plats. Any hazardous slopes and associated Native Growth Protection a(c Seat"cl� Easements (NGPE) shall be depicted on preliminary plans, engineering plans - 4 " and the final plat (e.g. proposed Tract B). Cis,/4. t- - if i .A Only Tract B falls within this category. The setback areas are not wide enough and should be modified prior to final plat approval. See enclosed map. 3. All proposed development shall be subject to King County Slope-Density- Ratio Residential Density Guidelines for Sloping Ground. Preliminary and engineering plans shall depict the building site area, slopes within each lot and lot sizes of all lots subject to these guidelines. -j-e. WALL- See enclosure. There are three additional lots (Lots 27, 46, and 70) that have slopes in excess of 15 percent. In addition, some of the calculations need (--tAt%z-" modification. ,.b ,).,-�. 344 f 1 --:& 4. Construction work related to clearing, filling, or grading shall be limited to Aril 1 throughSeptember 30, inclusive. Select clearing, filling, orgrading �r, � April P activities may be allowed outside of this period on a weekly basis, provided written approval is granted each week by the Federal Way Director of Public Works for specific activity. Note No. 16 of the erosion/sedimentation control notes on page 14 of 17 8 addresses when work can occur. Refer to redlines. 5. The Public Works Director may require that trees, shrubs and groundcover be retained within clearing, grading and construction limits except where necessary for installation of approved improvements, or may require replacement of vegetation in disturbed areas until future home construction occurs. Not applicable. 6. Runoff from the subdivision shall be controlled by the use of on-site detention and biofiltration swale facilities located in separate tracts and maintained by a 15-foot wide all-weather maintenance access road. Due to identified flooding problems in Lake #3 immediately downstream of the site, the detention facilities shall be sized to control the 2-year and 10-year, 24 hour storm events with a 30% factor of safety, unless the results of a downstream analysis of the flood conditions in Lake#3,to be conducted by the developer, require more stringent detention controls to mitigate impacts. The Santa Barbara Urban Hydrography method shall be used in sizing the facilities. Oilwater separation facilities shall be provide upstream of the biofiltration swale and detention ponds. See redlines -- CB #55 has to have oil/water separation prior to discharge into detention pond. 7. a. The following lists wetland areas and the stream corridor which shall be protected by a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) and the minimum width of wetland buffers for each: * Wetlands#1 (NGPE Tract D), #6 (NGPE Tract G), #10 (NGPE Tract E) - A minimum 25-foot wide buffer. J * Wetland#8 (NGPE Tract C) -A minimum 50-foot wide buffer. *-14c Stream Corridor- The existing 25-year flow regime limits or a " minimum 25-foot wide buffer from each side of the existing 10- ,k( year flow regime, whichever is greater. Boundaries of NGPE's need to be clearly shown on the engineering plans. It was not clear based on the existing plans where these boundaries are located. See redline for comments on stream stationing. All NGPE areas surrounding the wetlands and stream shall be dedicated as separate Sensitive Area Tracts, and depicted on the 9 preliminary plat plans, engineering plans and the face of the recorded final plat. Boundaries of NGPE's need to be clearly shown on the engineering plans. It was not clear based on the existing plans where these boundaries are located. The following language shall be shown on the face of the recorded final plat: "Any required sensitive area tract shall either be held in an undivided interest by each owner of a building lot within the development, and this ownership interest shall pass with the ownership of the lot or shall be held by an incorporated homeowner's association which assures the ownership and protection of the tract." Sensitive Area Tracts shall be used to protect all sensitive areas and shall be recorded on all documents of title of record for all affected lots. This condition is not applicable at this stage. It needs to be addressed at the final plat stage. b. The following statement shall be shown on the approved engineering plans and recorded final plat: "Building Setbacks and Native Growth Protection Easements (NGPE) Structures, fill and obstructions (including, but not limited to decks, patios, outbuildings, or overhangs beyond 18 inches) are prohibited within the buil.•. setback line (BSBL) and restricted floodplains (if applicable), and within any Native Growth Protection Easements) as established during engineering plan review. Dedication of a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the easement. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering,and protection of plant and animal habitat. The NGPE imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land, subject to the easement, the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Federal Way, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement. The vegetation 10 within the easement may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without express permission from the City of Federal Way, which permission must be obtained in writing from the City of Federal Way Department of Community Development or its successor agency. Before and during the course of any grading, building construction, or other development activity along any lot subject to the NGPE, the common boundary between the easement and the area of development activity must be fenced or otherwise marked to the satisfaction of the 44-\ City of Federal Way or its successor agency." This language has been placed on Page 1 of 17 of the engineering drawings. The word "fences" should be deleted from line 2. C. A minimum building setback line (BSBL) of 15 feet shall be required from the edge of wetland and stream corridor buffers and shall be depicted on the preliminary plat plan, engineering plans and final plat. Prohibitions on the use of hazardous or toxic substances and pesticides or certain fertilizers in this setback area may be imposed during the preliminary plan review process. The BSBL has been shown on the engineering plans (separate pages) but one can not see the overall picture. The entire plat is shown on page 1 of 17, but because of the scale and amount of information shown, it is confusing for the reviewer. Please add a sheet at 1:50 (same scale as Erosion Control) to provide all planning-related information including clearly delineated NGPE's, wetland boundaries, building setback lines, areas to be enhanced, fencing information, and other vegetative buffer areas. d. The boundaries of the NGPE and all Building Setback Lines (BSBL's) shall be shown on the face of the recorded plat by delineating their distance at each property boundary from an adjacent property corner and by indicating their distance from an approximately or precisely located natural feature (typically the top or toe of the slope). To be done at the final plat stage. 8. A minimum five foot tall fence must be installed on the edge of any NGPE area at the time that a dwelling is constructed on the adjoining lot or ownership of that lot transferred to the first owner-occupant. This fence must be constructed of such material which would allow visibility of the NGPE from the lots. A statement to this effect must be placed on the face of the recorded plat. r, tu, -e" 11 • 0Y `) iC, The desig f the fence must be included on the engineering plans; this has not _ (, been don . There is a statement on the Buffer Enhancement Plans that the fence 59 -�-� p'/ will be four feet high to be designed by others. Please see enclosed for a fence OA- / design that we have approved for previous final plats. Lie t_vtg.41 9. No fence shall be located along any wetland or NGPE buffer adjacent to J public right-of-way. ,.t-ny It appears that this condition has be met. A final determination will be made once the plan requested under SEPA Condition 7(c) has been submitted. 10. There shall be no introductions of any plant which is not indigenous to the Pacific Northwest into any wetland sensitive area unless authorized by a State of Washington Department of Ecology or federal license or permit. 5st)._ Hydroseeding should be limited onlyto those areas of the wetland and wetland Y g buffer where absolutely necessary. The wetland and buffer mix should consist of native grasses or their cultivars where possible. Some examples are Glyceria spp., Agrostis spp., Deschampia cespitosa, and Festuca rubra; many seed companies have realized the need for native grass seed and have made it more available at a reasonable cost. 11. To identify NGPE areas for the general public, the following shall be located along all public right-of-ways abutting NGPE Areas, including the Bonneville Power right-of-way: Signs 2 feet square, green background, white lettering stating "NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT- This area is preserved by a "Native Growth Protection Easement." No dumping, cutting„ grading, or filling is allowed. The exact location and height of each sign will be determined during engineering plan review. - The design of the sign submitted is King County's, not Federal Way's. Please refer to our sign code and modify where necessary. Please show proposed sign locations. 12. A final wetland mitigation plan shall be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to beginning any on-site construction work associated with the subdivision. The plan shall include the following information: a. Mitigation Plan including the following elements: 12 1. Environmental goals and objectives,including public access and buffer measures. 2. Performance standards 3. Detailed construction plans. 4. Timing. 5. Monitoring program for a minimum of five years. 6. Contingency plan. 7. Performance bonding in an amount of 120 percent of the costs of implementing each of the above elements. 4b. b4, ( The mitigation plan does not meet all of the above requirements. Numbers 21(a)(1) (4), and (5) have not been adequately addressed. Specifically, public access and buffer measures, timing, and five years monitoring have not been addressed; a three year monitoring program is proposed. Accordingly, the cost estimates in Table I of the January 19, 1994 letter form Terra Associates to Polygon needs to be amended. Polygon indicated that they would be setting aside Assignment of Funds to cover p t) the cost of monitoring. Please confirm that it is still their intention to use \ assignment of funds, as forms differ with the method of performance to be used. w" Once the final wetland mitigation planting plan has been approved, we will provide them with the appropriate forms. ✓ • b. cAn wetland miti ation im rovements exce t monito ' shall be� requiredg improvements, P �� completed and accepted by the Director of Community Development prior to A submitting the final plat for final approval. In any event, all mitigation work shall be completed within six months from the time wetland or wetland i f setback areas are initially disturbed through related subdivision construction activity. Not applicable at this time. c. The applicant shall pay for services of a qualified professional selected and retained by the City to review the wetland mitigation plan and other relevant information, conduct periodic inspections through the construction phase, issue a written report to the Director of Community Development stating the project complies with requirements of the mitigation plan, and to conduct and report to the Director on the status of the monitoring program. Language to ensure that the above conditions are met will be included in the "Agreement Forms" previously referenced. 13. The applicants shall provide, prior to the release of the performance bond, 13 nesting boxes for woodpeckers located in the mixed deciduous forest of the southwest and northwest corners. �, Please include a location for the nesting boxes on the engineering plans and ,*4'161)` propose timing for implementation. We will need to include 's information iin .vy, the "Agreement Forms." �,w, u -'4 + / 14. A Wetland Vegetation Enhancement plan for the northwest corner of the site I I-7' and central portion of the site shall be prepared as part of the preliminary plat review and prior to issuance of any construction permits. This condition has been met. 15. The proposed twenty (20) foot wide buffer easement along the south edge of proposed subdivision shall serve to protect existing trees and shall be enhanced by supplementing existing trees with new evergreen trees. A vegetation enhancement plan, for the twenty (20) foot wide easement, shall be submitted and approved prior to engineering plan approval. The plan 11/Co • shall depict the location of existing trees to be saved and locations where new fit'' evergreen trees will be planted. Existing trees to be identified shall include: evergreen trees a minimum six (6) feet in height; and deciduous, 5 inches in 1 caliper, measured 41/2 feet off the ground. Existing and supplemental trees t shall meet a minimum 15 foot separation standard within the buffer ment. Supplemental trees shall be eight (8) feet in height at the time of pl ting (measured from the ground to the top of the tree). Existing trees / which are dead, dying, diseased, or considered a hazard) may be allowed to •; U '' b: removed during plat construction. / t" ,,..) 1,9-:()_ • The intent of this condition was not to relocate existing trees, but to supplement, if necessary. Please modify plan. Prior to fmal plat recording, as part of a homeowners association, a Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed by the City of Federal Way to ensure that adequate provisions are included prohibiting the cutting of trees (within the twenty(20) foot wide buffer easement), and construction or locating of structures within the easement (with the exception of fencing along property lines). Required supplemental trees shall be planted prior to final plat recording. Li-4 . ft� �. To be addressed prior to final plat recording. J -r Y )° �''' 16. Proposed open space areas between wetland buffers #8 (NGPE Tract C) and #10 (NGPE Tract E) and proposed right-of-ways shall be subject to all Native 14 Growth Protection Easement requirements. Compliance with this condition shall be determined once the plan requested in the response to SEPA Condition 7(c) has been submitted. 17. The applicant shall provide for .79 acres of on-site active recreation open space, or pay to the City of Federal Way Parks Department a fee-in-lieu of reservation or dedication for active recreation open space/parks per King County Title 19.38.080 in the amount of $48,777.92. NOTE: The fee-in-lieu of open space is based on the assessed value of subject property the year preliminary plat approval is granted, estimated to be in 1993. The assessment available to date is that used for the year 1992. It appears that open space is not being provided on site. A fee in lieu of open space dedication must be submitted with the application for fmal plat approval. 18. The existing Sanitary Sewer (SS) easement (Proposed Tract I) between the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) easement and the southern most street (proposed Road E), shall serve as a connection between the proposed trail beneath the BPA powerlines and the southern most road within subject property. This easement shall be dedicated to the public for general public access, dedicated as a separate tract, and depicted on the preliminary plat plans, engineering plans and the face of the recorded final plat. If it is determined, during engineering plan review, that locating the trail along the Sanitary Sewer easement is not feasible, due to topographic or other constraints, an alternative location shall be provided to connect the proposed BPA trail to proposed Road "E". The specific location of Tract "P" shall be approved during engineering plan review by the Director of Public Works or his/her designee. A 12-foot wide all-weather surface pathway shall be constructed within the easement, with landscaping planted on each side of the pathway. The landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Community Development. The trail is shown as Tract I. Dedication will occur upon appropriate language being inserted on the final plat and upon recording of the plat. The proposed landscaping is acceptable. The following shall be placed on the face of the recorded plat: 15 "The Public Access Easement area shall be maintained by all owners of all building lots within the development, and this ownership interest shall pass with the ownership of each lot or shall be held by an incorporated homeowner's association or other legal entity which assures the ownership and protection of the tract acceptable to the City of Federal Way. Not applicable at this stage. II. Other Requirements 1. The preliminary plat needs to comply with Finding #6 of the Hearing Examiner's decision which states that an agreement was reached between the applicant and the Heritage Court Homeowners Association to provide a 15 foot wide buffer along the property line with Heritage Court. This buffer is shown. Please include it on the overall plan requested in the response to SEPA Condition 7(c)., , 2. The plat also needs to provide fencing between the site and Westboro per the private agreement entered into between the parties. Please show location of fencing. - ----2 f ( .-r rr.�tA i R-L• cry L�,,c, 3. Proof of approval by the Postal Service of location of mailboxes need to be submitted. Please submit documentation to show that this has been obtained. 4. Please address the enclosed comments from the City's Wetland Ecologist. Should you have any questions on the City's comments, please call Margaret Clark at 661-4111 or Jeff Sharp at 661-4125. After you have had an opportunity to review these comments, we would be happy to meet with you to discuss them, if you so desire. Enc: February 11, 1994 correspondence from Susan Meyer, Wetland Ecologist Slope Density Information and Map Fence and NGPE Design Redlined Drawings Binder CMPUSGLN\ENCHNRNO.REV 16 4 I 1 15. The original SEPA condition read as follows: The proposed twenty (20) foot wide buffer easement along the south edge of proposed subdivision shall serve to protect existing trees and shall be enhanced by supplementing existing trees with new evergreen trees. A vegetation enhancement plan, for the twenty (20) foot wide easement, shall be submitted and approved prior to engineering plan approval. The plan shall depict the location of existing trees to be saved and locations where new evergreen trees will be planted. Existing trees to be identified shall include: evergreen trees a minimum six (6) feet in height; and deciduous, 5 inches in caliper, measured 4 1/2 feet off the ground. Existing and supplemental trees shall meet a minimum 15 foot separation standard within the buffer easement. Supplemental trees shall be eight (8) feet in height at the time of planting (measured from the ground to the top of the tree). Existing trees which are dead, dying, diseased, or considered a hazard) may be allowed to be removed during plat construction. Prior to final plat recording, as part of a homeowners association, a Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed by the City of Federal Way to ensure that adequate provisions are included prohibiting the cutting of trees (within the twenty (20) foot wide buffer easement), and construction or locating of structures within the easement (with the exception of fencing along property lines). Required supplemental trees shall be planted prior to final plat recording. Because the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) removed the entire buffer in Summer of 1994, due to their designation as dangerous trees,the following condition was imposed on Polygon in order to replace the buffer. This condition was based on consultation with BPA as to the kinds of trees which would have the least impact on their power lines: Within the 20 foot easement adjacent to the BPA right-of-way, provide a vegetative buffer consisting of a mix of cedar and Douglas Fir, planted a minimum 20 feet apart, on center, a minimum height of six feet, measured from the ground to the top of the tree. A vegetation enhancement plan shall be submitted to the City of Federal Way for review and approval. Accompanying this plan must be a schedule for planting. Prior to fmal plat approval, a bond or assignment of funds must be posted to ensure future landscaping. Prior to final plat recording, as part of a homeowners association, a Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed by the City of Federal Way to ensure that adequate provisions are included prohibiting the cutting of trees (within the twenty (20) foot wide buffer easement), and construction or locating of structures within the easement (with the exception of fencing along property lines). TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. . Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology .4 and Environmental Earth Sciences January 19, 1994 Revised March 28, 1994 Project No.T-2521 Mr. Gary Young Polygon Northwest,Inc. 4040 Lake Washington Boulevard NE,Suite 201 REVISION DATE Kirkland,Washington 98033 1 Subject: Wetland Mitigation Plan APR 0 5 1994 Campus Glen Federal Way,Washington Dear Mr.Young: As requested,we have prepared a wetland mitigation plan for the Campus Glen residential development to be constructed in Federal Way, Washington. This mitigation plan addresses three areas on the property identified under preliminary plat approval requirements. We have prepared wetland buffer enhancement plans for NGPE Tract C in the center of the project and NGPE Tract E in the northwest corner. We also prepared a planting plan for the excavated compensating storage area within NGPE Tract G. This letter describes the mitigation concepts,goals,and objectives for the project. Mitigation plans are presented graphically on the attached Planting Plan,Sheets 1 and 2. In preparing this mitigation/enhancement plan, we visited the subject site and reviewed the wetland evaluation report for the property prepared by Patrametrix,Inc. Our mitigation plan drawings are based on engineering plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers. MITIGATION CONCEPT In general, the proposed wetland mitigation/enhancement plan is designed to accelerate the establishment of a natural plant community within the three designated NGPE areas and control the growth of invasive weedy species, including reed canarygrass and Himalayan blackberry. Design features,goals,and objectives for the three areas are discussed below. NGPE Tract E The wetland within NGPE Tract E is a palustrine scrub-shrub habitat with patches of open water and a viable, well-established plant community. There are scattered live and standing dead trees within the wetland. No new plantings to enhance the wetland plant community are recommended. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (206) 821-7777 Mr.Gary Young January 19, 1994 Revised March 28, 1994 The upland buffer is part of the second or third growth forest occupying the majority of the project site. There is a closed canopy of western red cedar,western hemlock,and Douglas fir. Red alder and black cottonwood are also present. There are many fallen trees throughout the site and within the upland buffer in NGPE Tract E. These are presumably from the severe windstorm in January 1993. Below the closed forest canopy, there is a sparse shrub layer primarily of huckleberry and salal. Holly is also present. Groundcover growth is dominated by sword fern, salal, and dewberry. Seedling and sapling size western red cedar,hemlock,and holly are present. When the adjacent area is cleared for the roadway and building lots, the shrub understory will be opened up to sunlight and growth of the understory shrub would be expected. The proposed buffer enhancement involves planting additional tree and shrub species in the outside margin of the buffer along the proposed South 330th Place. The goal of the proposed buffer plantings is to supplement the existing understory shrub and tree growth within the designated upland buffer of NGPE Tract E, adjacent to South 330th Place. These plantings are designed to satisfy the objective of increasing the density of plant cover within the upland buffer adjacent to the roadway. Wild rose, vine maple, Douglas fir, and huckleberry were selected to be able to grow well in the open when the adjacent area is cleared for construction of South 330th Place. The fence and maintenance of dense shrub growth in the buffer will discourage public access to the NGPE. Buffer plantings can be scheduled depending on availability. The preferred planting time is during the winter dormant season, late fall through early spring (November to April). Plantings should be made after grading work for adjacent roadway has been completed. NGPE Tract C Existing conditions in the wetland and upland buffer of NGPE Tract C are similar to that described for NGPE Tract E. There is a well-established dense shrub understory within the upland buffer around the wetland. The exception is the southeast margin of the buffer where a sanitary sewer line crosses through it. This sewer line has been used as an off-road vehicle track. Surface soils are compacted and there is little plant cover. Enhancement of the NGPE Tract C buffer involves remediation of the sewer line easement area. The compacted soils should be overexcavated by a depth of 12 inches and replaced with topsoil. Topsoil strippings from other areas of the site can serve as a source of the organic rich topsoil to be used. Shrub and tree plantings will reestablish vegetative cover over the disturbed area. The goal of the proposed buffer plantings is to accelerate the re-establishment of native shrub and tree growth over the sewer line easement and to supplement the existing understory shrub and tree growth within the designated upland buffer of NGPE Tract C, adjacent to South 331st Place. These plantings are designed to satisfy the objective of increasing the density of vegetative cover. Construction of the fence and maintenance of dense shrub growth in the buffer will discourage public access to the NGPE. Project No.T-2521 Page No. 2 • Mr.Gary Young January 19, 1994 Revised March 28, 1994 Buffer plantings can be scheduled depending on availability. The preferred planting time is during the winter dormant season, late fall through early spring (November to April). Plantings should be made after clearing and grading work for the adjacent Lots 87 through 90 and work on the sewer line and adjacent roadway has been completed. < NGPE Tract G NGPE Tract G is an area in the southwest corner of the project designed to be excavated to provide compensating surface water storage. NGPE Tract G will be excavated to a bottom elevation of Elev. 324, which is two to four feet below existing grades. At this elevation, the hydrology within the excavated area should be similar to that within the wetland located immediately to the north. There should be variation (plus or minus about six inches) in grade along the bottom of the excavated area. The area should be overexcavated by 12 inches below design grades to allow the placement of organic rich topsoil over the excavated area. Plantings within the excavated area include a mix of emergent wetland species (cattail, sedges, and bulrush) and shrubs (willows). Emergent species should be planted in the deeper sections and willow should be planted in the shallower sections as shown on the Planting Plan. The primary goal of the work to be completed within NGPE Tract G is to provide compensating stormwater storage volume. The planting plan for the compensating storage pond is designed to accelerate the establishment of vegetative cover to mimic a natural wetland plant community. MONITORING Following completion of the project, including buffer enhancement in NGPE Tracts C and E and the compensating storage area in NGPE Tract G, it should be monitored for a five year period. The wetland biologist should examine the project during August of the five years following project completion and prepare a written report addressing the survivability and growth of plant materials. as well as any recommendations for maintenance or remediation. These reports will be submitted to the City of Federal Way for review by September 30 of each of the five years after completion of the work. An initial report describing the as-built conditions will be prepared for submittal to the City of Federal Way when construction work has been completed. This report will identify the work completed and document the baseline conditions for defining the success of the project in the subsequent monitoring reports. Project No. T-2521 Page No. 3 Mr. Gary Young January 19, 1994 Revised March 28, 1994 CARE AND MAINTENANCE The wetland and buffer areas should be examined periodically to determine the possible invasion of weedy pest species such as Scot's broom, reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) which compete with more desirable native species. These pest species should be controlled as they appear in the area. Reed canarygrass can be periodically cut to control its growth,and blackberry can be physically pulled out or cut down. SAMPLING METHODS Sampling locations will be established using a stratified random method based on the vegetation zones and hydrologic conditions. Some permanent plots will be established that will be monitored each of the three years along with randomly selected plots determined each year. In addition to the random sample plots, permanent photo points will be established from which the mitigation area can be photographed. This will provide a pictorial record of the development of the area over time. STANDARDS FOR SUCCESS A determination of the success in achieving the mitigation goals and objectives will be based on the following standards that have been designed to be met at the end of five years: 1. A minimum of 75 percent average vegetative cover throughout the wetland and buffer areas. Plant species composition should meet the intent of the mitigation goals. 2. Establishment of the plant community types as identified on the planting plan. The vegetation zones will be more accurately defined in the post-construction report and may be subject to some alteration from the design based on unanticipated conditions. 3. Eighty percent survival of planted trees and shrubs. This survival rate is established as a goal and may be adjusted where natural regeneration and growth has resulted in minimum plant cover as defined in Item 1 above. Weedy species such as reed canarygrass and Himalayan blackberry will not be considered suitable substitutes for the planted species. CONTINGENCY PLANS If it becomes apparent based on the monitoring program that the mitigation objectives are not being met, a joint determination by the project applicant, the wetland biologist, and the City of Federal Way will be made to implement a contingency plan. The contingency plan can include measures such as replacing plants which have not survived and removing competing weedy species. Project No.T-2521 Page No.4 Mr.Gary Young January 19, 1994 Revised March 28, 1994 In accordance with the City of Federal Way requirements, the proponent will be required to post a security bond for the wetland mitigation plan. The bonding is based on the estimated cost of replacement of plant materials and the required monitoring by a wetland biologist. We have prepared an estimated cost summary for completion of the plantings within the mitigation area. This summary is presented on the attached Table 1. This final mitigation should be included as part of the construction drawing set. We look forward to working with you on the completion of the wetland mitigation plan. If you have any questions or need additional information,please call. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC. (NI/AIL, Garet P. Munger Project Scientist GPM:eb Encl: Table 1 -Cost Estimates Planting Plan- Sheets 1 and 2 Project No. T-2521 Page No. 5 ' w TABLE 1 COST ESTIMATES Wetland Mitigation Plan Campus Glen Federal Way,Washington Installation Costs Nursery Plantings $2,200 Construction Inspection and Consultation by Wetland Biologist $1,000 (Terra Associates) Subtotal $3,200 Monitoring Program Year One $1,000 Year Two $1,000 Year Three $1,000 Year Four $1,000 Year Five $1,250 Subtotal $5,250 Total Estimated Costs $8,450 Mitigation Bond Amount 120% of total $10,140 ,', Cat=t1F � f'osr i Project No.T-2521 TABLE 1 COST ESTIMATES Wetland Mitigation Plan Campus Glen Federal Way, Washington Installation Costs Nursery Plantings $2,200 Construction Inspection and Consultation by Wetland Biologist $1,000 (Terra Associates) Subtotal $3,200 x . 1 3 a Monitoring Program Year One $1,000 Year Two $1,000 Year Three $1,000 Year Four $1,000 Year Five $1,250 Subtotal $5,250 )(i _ �,'a A Total Estimated Costs $8,450 s.t Mitigation Bond Amount 120% of total $10,140 C L `)) i s • Project No.T-2521 ' , r Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Permit #:King Co. File #S89P01 14 Project: Campus Glen Federal Way File #ILA90-PPO8 Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and Account Amount: $6,300.00 BPA Transmission Line and Cash Deposit Amount: $ 100.00 approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Avenue S., if extended CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ASSIGNMENT OF FUNDS IN LIEU OF BOND THIS ASSIGNMENT ("Assignment") is dated effective this 14th day of October, 1994. The parties ("Parties") to this Assignment are the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City") and the undersigned owner or applicant ("Assignor"). A. The Assignor is required to perform certain work, and/or construct and maintain certain improvements at the above-referenced property address located in Federal Way, Washington ("Property") in connection with Assignor's application under the above-referenced permit numbers and in accordance with an Agreement to Monitor Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan ("Agreement") entered into between the City and the Assignor of even date, which Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. B. The improvements will be constructed or the work will be performed in accordance with record drawings and approved plans on file with the City of Federal Way and specifically that certain Wetland Planting Plan and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., dated January 19, 1994 (as revised March 29, 1994) ("Plans"); C. The City has determined that Assignor must post security with the City pursuant to Sections 22-146 through 22-159 of the Federal Way City Code ("FWCC") as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended, to guarantee Assignor's performance of required maintenance or repair and Assignor's performance of construction of certain work or improvements pursuant to the Plans, as a condition of granting the permit. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1 . Amount of Account. Pursuant to Section 22-149 of the FWCC that portion of this Assignment which is in lieu of a performance bond, shall be equal to one hundred and twenty percent (120%) of the cost of the work or improvements. 2. Assignment. Assignor does hereby assign, transfer and set over unto the City all right, title and interest in and to the sum of Six Thousand Three Hundred Dollars and no/100 ($6,300.00)on deposit at Seafirst National Bank ("Bank"), under account No. 541 00979 ("Account"); said Account being in the name of the City, as principal with full power and authority to demand, collect and receive the Account and to give receipt and acquittance for the Account. ORIGINAL 3. Improvements. Assignor shall perform all monitoring required pursuant to the Agreement and Plans, to the City's satisfaction. The monitoring obligation shall continue for five (5) years from the completion date of the improvements, or such longer period as required by the FWCC or other applicable law, rule or regulation. 4. Release. Assignor agrees that the Account will be released to the City, on demand, with no other conditions of release. This Assignment may be terminated with the City's written consent, which consent shall not be granted until the City has determined that (i) the monitoring has been performed to its satisfaction, in full compliance with the Agreement and Plans and all applicable local, state or federal law, and within the time period prescribed by the City, and (ii) Assignor has performed all its obligations under this Assignment. At the end of each Monitoring Program year and only after the City has inspected the Property to insure compliance with the Plans and Agreement, the City may release this Assignment by executing and delivering the Partial Release of Assignment attached hereto as Exhibit B and the Full Release of Assignment attached hereto as Exhibits C as follows: Monitoring Program Amount Released Year One $1,200.00 Year Two $1,200.00 Year Three $1,200.00 Year Four $1,200.00 Year Five $1 ,500.00 Total Costs: $6,300.00 5. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, perform any of the necessary work in connection with the monitoring required by the Agreement and Plans. Upon demand, Assignor agrees to pay the City an amount equal to all of the City's costs and expenses in performing such work or the City shall be reimbursed its costs and expenses from the Account at the City's election. 6. Indemnification. Assignor agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Assignment, including without limitation, the City's performance of any maintenance, monitoring or other work or construction of the improvements pursuant to Section 5 herein. 7. Administrative Cash Deposit. In addition to the amount of this Assignment, Assignor agrees to pay a cash deposit to the City, pursuant to Section 22-151 of the FWCC, upon the execution of this Assignment equal to the amount of One Hundred Dollars and no/100 ($100.00). The cash deposit may be used by the City to cover its actual expenses in administering this Assignment and, if necessary, collecting and using the proceeds from the Account. -2- 8. Remedies Cumulative. No remedy provided for by this Assignment shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to every other remedy available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. Assignor agrees that its liability under this Assignment is not limited to the amount of the Account. 9. License. The Assignor hereby grants to the City the irrevocable license and right to enter the Property in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "D", to inspect such work and install or maintain the required mitigation pursuant to the conditions of final plat approval and the Plans, as the City deems necessary, and at the City's election. The Assignor shall record such license with the King County Department of Records immediately upon the execution of this Assignment, at Assignor's expense. 10. General Provisions. This Assignment may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the Parties. Any provision of this Assignment which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default shall not waive such breach or default. This Assignment may not be assigned by either Party without the other Party's written consent. This Assignment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties' successors in interest. In the event of any dispute between the Parties regarding this Assignment, each Party shall pay its own attorney fees and costs. Each person executing this Assignment represents that he or she is authorized to execute this Assignment on behalf of their respective entity. Time is of the essence. CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: Approved pp oved as to Form (s�i nature)47 fi (printed name and title) o ---7n i y torney 4030 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 K:\BONDS\CAMPSGLN.ASF Kirkland, WA 98033 10-18-94 (206) 822-7700 -3- BANK ACCEPTANCE The undersigned financial institution ("Bank") hereby accepts that certain Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond provided to the City of Federal Way ("City") by Campus Glen Limited Partnership ("Assignor") dated October 14, 1994, providing for Assignor's assignment to the City of all right, title and interest in and to the sum of Six Thousand Three Hundred Dollars and no/100 ($6,300.00) on deposit at the SeAr-.t.2.5—) (a`yLGV u L branch, under account no. 54100979 ("Account"), payment of which shall be made upon demand by the City with no other conditions of release of the Account. The Bank agrees to hold the Account, without deduction or withdrawal, until it receives a written release of this Assignment from the City. The Bank acknowledges that it has no duty to evaluate any dispute which may exist between the City and Assignor regarding the Account and shall not interplead or in any manner delay payment of the Account to the City, upon its demand. The Bank hereby agrees to bind itself, and its heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, jointly and severally. [BANK] BY: t_. 1c-.%v, Signature of Authorized Personnel (Signature to be notarized below) ITS: PGRSontA C 6A N KLiu G t��FT_Cr2 (Title) e L LC Uct is C JA ?90 ey (ADDRESS) a 3 - 5i o (PHONE) STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. [BANK NOTARY] COUNTY OF KING O this day personally appeared before me G n � S to be there(so., L3 / 4 0 .e 4 , to me known $ °1�51`' �wrt , the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. GIVEN my hand and official seal hereto affi his GOB day of dcAd Ae , 19 9y ,E1p,0C' Bsi KEVIN R RI OCH 44_ .� �s�,,��. �j� (typed or printed name of notary) k -<,�QTAR y Notary Public in and for the tate pf Washington. • G My commission expires 7�/y/I 's PUBS\ : z -- o WAS EXHIBIT "A" Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Project: Campus Glen Permit No: King Co. File #S89P0114/ Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and ILA90-PP08 BPA Transmission Line and approxi- mately 8th Ave. S. & 4th Ave. S. , if extended AGREEMENT TO MONITOR WETLAND AND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN Basis for Agreement A. The undersigned Principal applied to King County ("County") under the Project name, Campus Glen ("Project") and under BALD File No. S89P0114 and to the City of Federal Way ("City") under Permit No. ILA90-PP08 to construct certain improvements or perform work at certain real property previously located in King County, State of Washington, and after the date of the City's incorporation, located within the city limits of Federal Way, having an address more commonly known as between S. 328th St. and BPA Transmission Line and approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Ave. S. , if extended. ("Property") ; B. The City determined that a mitigation plan must be installed and maintained as a condition of preliminary plat approval granted August 17, 1993 pursuant to City of Federal Way Resolution No. 93-149; and C. The City will grant final plat approval only if the Principal agrees to install and maintain the mitigating measures set forth in the preliminary plat approval as more particularly described in that certain Wetland Planting Plan and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. , dated January 19, 1994 (Revised March 29, 1994) , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference ("Plan") . Terms of the Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, the Principal hereby agrees and binds itself, and its legal representatives, successors, and assigns, as follows: 1. Notice. The Principal shall notify the City in writing upon completion of all installation as described in the Plan. At such time, the Principal shall further provide, in writing, to the City, the dates the Principal will commence the mitigation observation and the dates it will submit each of the monitoring observation reports pursuant to Section 3 herein and as required by the Plan. 2 . Bond/Assignment of Funds. The Principal shall provide to the City a Performance/Maintenance Bond, Assignment of Funds, or other security in form and content acceptable to the City to guarantee the Principal's performance of the monitoring as required by this Agreement and the Plan, to the City's satisfaction. 3 . Monitoring. The Principal shall maintain the improvements installed under the Plan so as to create healthy growing conditions for a period of five (5) years commencing on the date of completion of all installation described in the Plan. The Principal shall submit a monitoring report on the status with as-built drawings within one (1) year after installation and subsequent monitoring reports for the following years shall be submitted within twelve (12) months of submission of the prior report. While maintenance may result in a partial release of any bond or other security posted by the Principal, at the City's election, the Principal recognizes its continuing duty to maintain the Plan as required by the King County Code or other applicable federal, state or local law. 4 . Contingency Plan. If the Project has not met its performance standards set forth in the Plan by the end of the five (5) year monitoring period, the Principal is responsible for the preparation and implementation of a contingency plan to remedy the situation, in form acceptable to the City. 5. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, perform the monitoring as required by this Agreement and the Plan, and upon demand, the Principal shall pay the City an amount equal to its costs and expenses in performing such monitoring or the City shall be reimbursed its costs and expenses pursuant to any bond posted by the Principal, at the City's election. 6. Indemnification. Principal agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Agreement, including without limitation, the City's performance of any monitoring or other work pursuant to Section 5 herein. 7. Remedies not Exclusive. No remedy provided for by this Agreement or any bond or other security posted by Principal shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to every other remedy available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. 9. General Provisions. This Agreement may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the parties. Any provisions of this Agreement which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default by the Principal shall not waive such breach or default. Each party shall pay its own attorney's fees and costs in connection with any lawsuit or other action relating to this -2- Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Principal's successors in interest, heirs and assigns. Time is of the essence. DATED effective this 1 ? day of October, 1994. PRINCIPAL: CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC. , Its General Partner By: C � (sign re) Carl %«45 G( /' c v (printed name and title) 4030 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 (206) 822-7700 K:\BONDS\CAMSGLN.MON 10-14-94 -3- EXHIBIT A [ATTACH WETLAND AND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN] EXHIBIT B PARTIAL RELEASE OF ASSIGNMENT The undersigned hereby acknowledges that a portion of the conditions set forth in that Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond ("Assignment") provided to the City of Federal Way ("City") by Campus Glen Limited Partnership ("Assignor")dated October 14, 1994 for Campus Glen, King Co. Permit #S89P01 14/ILA90-PPO8have been satisfied and hereby authorizes the release of an amount equal to One Thousand Two Hundred Dollars and no/100 ($1,200.00) from account number S V/a O 9 7 9 ("Account") in the en Branch of ee,t- ;'rs-f- 6Bank"). The remaining funds shall be held by the Bank in the Account pursuant to the terms of the Assignment as security for Assignor's performance of all monitoring for the project described therein. DATED this day of , 19_. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: (Name, Title) EXHIBIT C FULL RELEASE OF ASSIGNMENT/LICENSE Pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Assignment of Funds in Lieu of Bond ("Assignment") provided to the City of Federal Way ("City") by Campus Glen Limited Partnership ("Assignor") dated October 14, 1994 for Campus Glen, King Co. Permit #S89P01 14/ILA90-PPO„ the City hereby acknowledges that the five (5) year monitoring period has expired, that the work or improvements covered by the Assignment have been completed to the City's satisfaction and that the City is not aware of any defect in workmanship or materials. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby releases the sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No/100 ($1,500.Q0)from account number S5�/0097R in the Upe/levee_ Branch of Se4A`rsf /i'th u- Bai/R- ("Bank"). The undersigned further releases all right, title and interest granted to the undersigned by reason of a certain License Agreement recorded under King County Recording No. ("License Agreement") and acknowledges that all obligations and rights contained in the License Agreement are hereby terminated. DATED this day of , 19 . CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: (Name, Title) FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR: Campus Glen Limited Partnership RECORDERS USE: MAIL TO: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 ATTN: Margaret Clark LICENSE The undersigned owner of certain real property located in Federal Way, Washington and legally described as follows: [Legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference] ("Property") hereby grants an irrevocable license to the City of Federal Way ("City") and the City's agents, employees, contractors or representatives to enter upon the Property to inspect the construction of improvements, the performance of work or to allow the City to perform any necessary maintenance or work, all pursuant to Agreement to Install and Maintain Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan, Agreement to Install and Maintain Vegetative Buffer/Landscape Improvements Plan, Agreement to Monitor Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan, Cash Deposit Agreements and Assignment of Funds entered into between the City and the undersigned, which Agreements are incorporated herein by this reference. DATED this (90 ' day of October, 1994 . CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner By:✓ / (signatu l 6u::1 %unc /let e (printed name and title) STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that t'41^)/ h. l/p j , is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this inst umen on oath stated that he was authorihzd to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as U„i.4, P✓'6s eei"j . of BRENTVIEW, INC., which is General Partner of POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, which is General Partner of CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN my hand and official seal thisc day of Oc ber, 1994. V/cii M- Sou/d (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for tll K:\BONDS\CAMPSGLN.LIC My commission expires g" " : Stet,5%Was^gton. EXHIBIT "A" TO LICENSE • SURVEY DATA CORRECTS)LEGAL DESCRIFTION FROM BASELINE ENCiNEERING NG That portion of the North half of the Southwest quarter and that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and that portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, all in Section 17.. Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County. Washington, lying within the parcel described in a quit claim deed recorded under Recording No. 9308121901 and surveyed and Ilegally described by Terrell C. Ferguson, P.LS., of Baseline Engineering Inc., in records of survey recorded in Volume 94 of Surveys at pages 141 and 141a and Volume 95 of Surveys at pages 116 and 116a, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of said Section 17; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said Section 17, a distance of 1,317.78 feet; THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East, a distance of 42.00 feet; THENCE South 88' 49' 37" East, a distance of 686.72 feet to the Northwest corner of King County Short Plat No. 580108 per Recording No. 8104300739, records of King County; Washington; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 1,112.24 feet to a point on the Southerly right—of—way line of South 328th Street; THENCE South 75' 27' 16" West along said Southerly right—of—way line, a distance of 25.00 feet to the Northwest corner of the Plat of West Highlands Division No. 1, as recorded in Volume 127 of Plats, pages 26 through 28, records of King County. Washington; • THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said plat. a distance of 484.39 feet to the South line of said plat; • • THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East along the South line of said plat..a distance of 14.69 feet to a tangent curve concave to the North having a radius of• 1.100.00 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 10' 24' 04", an arc distance of 199.69 feet to the Northeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142. per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County. Washington. said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said curve to the left having a radius of 1,100.00 feet, through a central angle of 76' 34' 24". an arc distance of 1,470.10 feet to the Northeast corner of 'Lot 3 of King County Short Plat No. 580108, per Recording No. 8104300739, records of King County, Washington; THENCE South 86' 34' 16" East along the South line of.Campus Green II, a condominium as recorded 'in Volume 53. of Condominiums at pages 96 through 97, records of King County. Washington, a distance • of 369.70 feet to the West line 'of the Plat of Heritage West, as recorded in Volume 91 of Plats, pages 11 and 12. records of•King County. Washington; THENCE South 32' 34' 05" East along the West line of said plat, a distance of 239.16 feet to an angle point in said West line; THENCE South 36' 10' 33" East continuing along the West line of said plat. a distance of 157.41 feet to an angle point in said West line of said plat; THENCE South 23' 28' 12" West continuing along the West line of said plat, a distance of 105.00 feet to the Southerly line of South 327th Street as shown in said Plat of Heritage West. and 'a point of curvature with a tangent curve concave to the Northeast whose radius point bears North 23' 28' 12" East and is 380.00 feet distant; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 42' 17' 45", an arc distance of 280.52 feet to an angle point on said Southerly line of South 327th Street; THENCE South 18' 49' 33" East along the Westerly line of said South 327th Street and the Westerly line of Lot 61 of said Plat of Heritage West, a distance of 181.32 feet to the Northwesterly margin line of Bonneville Power Association Transmission Line right—of—way, Tacoma—Grand Coulee No. 1 recorded under • Recording Nos. 3131454, 3186542, 3252183. 4201227. 4660593. 5151465. and 5204177; THENCE South 57 58' 44" West along said Northwesterly margin line, a distance of 1,803.52 feet to the Southeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142 per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County. Washington; THENCE North 37' 01' 16" West alon9 the East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 516.50 feet to an angle point in said East line; THENCE North 09'. 21' 29" West continuing along said East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 299.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO easements, covenants,.and restrictions of record. • r ti Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Permit #:King Co. File #S89P01 14 Project: Campus Glen Federal Way File #ILA90-PPO8 Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and Account Amount: $3,840.00 BPA Transmission Line and Cash Deposit Amount: $ 100.00 approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Avenue S., if extended CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CASH DEPOSIT AGREEMENT IN LIEU OF BOND FOR WETLAND ENHANCEMENT INSTALLATION THIS CASH DEPOSIT AGREEMENT IN LIEU OF BOND ("Agreement") is dated effective this 14th day of October, 1994. The parties ("Parties") to this Agreement are the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City") and the undersigned owner or applicant ("Applicant"). A. The Applicant is required to perform certain work, and/or construct and maintain certain improvements at the above-referenced property address located in Federal Way, Washington ("Property") in connection with Applicant's application under the above-referenced permit numbers and in accordance with an Agreement to Install and Maintain Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan ("Wetland Agreement") entered into between the City and the Applicant of even date, which Wetland Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. B. The improvements will be constructed or the work will be performed in accordance with record drawings and approved plans on file with the City of Federal Way and specifically that certain Wetland Planting Plan and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., dated January 19, 1994, as revised March 29, 1994 ("Plans"); C. The City has determined that Applicant must post security with the City pursuant to Sections 22-146 through 22-159 of the Federal Way City Code ("FWCC") as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended, to guarantee Applicant's performance of required maintenance or repair and Applicant's performance of certain work or improvements pursuant to the Plans, as a condition of granting the permit. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1 . Amount of Cash Deposit. Pursuant to Section 22-149 of the FWCC that portion of this Agreement which is in lieu of a performance bond, shall be equal to one hundred and twenty percent (120(Y0) of the cost of the work or improvements and that portion of this Agreement which is in lieu of a maintenance bond, shall be equal to thirty percent (30%) of the cost of replacing materials consisting of nursery plantings.. 2. Cash Deposit. Applicant does hereby pay to the City the amount of Three Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Dollars and No/100 ($3,840.00) ("Cash Deposit"). The City shall deposit such Cash Deposit in its Performance Bond Account ("Account"). ORIGINAL 3. Improvements. Applicant shall perform all work, improvements, and maintenance required pursuant to the Wetland Agreement and Plans, to the City's satisfaction. The maintenance obligation shall continue for five (5) years from the completion date of the improvements, or such longer period as required by the FWCC or other applicable law, rule or regulation. 4. Release. The Cash Deposit will only be repaid to Applicant if the City determines that (i) all the improvements have been constructed and installed and all work and maintenance performed to its satisfaction, in full compliance with the Wetland Agreement and Plans and all applicable local, state or federal law, and within the time period prescribed by the City, and (ii) Applicant has performed all its obligations under this Agreement. The City may release the Cash Deposit as follows: (a) Partial Release. Upon completion of the improvements in compliance with the foregoing provisions, the City will release seventy per cent (70%) of the cost of the materials consisting of nursery plantings, which amount is equal to One Thousand Eight Hundred Forty- Eight Dollars and no/100 ($1,848.00), and all of the initial construction and consultants costs in the amount of One Thousand Two Hundred Dollars and no/I00 ($1,200.00) for a total of Three Thousand Forty-Eight Dollars and no/100 ($3,048.00) by issuing a check to Applicant. (b) Full Release. Five (5) years after completion of the improvements and performance of the maintenance program in compliance with the foregoing provisions, the City will release the remaining portion of the Cash Deposit, in the amount of Seven Hundred Ninety-Two Dollars and no/100 ($792.00), by issuing a check to Applicant. 5. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, perform any of the necessary work in connection with the construction or completion of the improvements or performance of the maintenance required by the Wetland Agreement and Plans. The City may disburse the Cash Deposit to the City in an amount equal to all of the City's costs and expenses in performing such work. 6. Indemnification. Applicant agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Agreement, including without limitation, the City's performance of any maintenance or other work or construction of the improvements pursuant to Section 5 herein. 7. Administrative Cash Deposit. In addition to the amount of this Cash Deposit, Applicant agrees to pay an additional cash deposit to the City, pursuant to Section 22-151 of the FWCC, upon the execution of this Agreement equal to the amount of One Hundred Dollars and no/100 ($100.00). The administrative cash deposit may be used by the City to cover its actual expenses in administering this Agreement. 8. Remedies Cumulative. No remedy provided for by this Agreement shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to every other remedy available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. Applicant agrees that its liability under this Agreement is not limited to the amount of the Cash Deposit. -2- 9. License. The Applicant hereby grants to the City the irrevocable license and right to enter the Property in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "B", to inspect such work and install or maintain the required mitigation pursuant to the conditions of final plat approval and the Plans, as the City deems necessary, and at the City's election. The Applicant shall record such license with the King County Department of Records immediately upon the execution of this Agreement, at Applicant's expense. 10. General Provisions. This Agreement may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the Parties. Any provision of this Agreement which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default shall not waive such breach or default. This Agreement may not be assigned by either Party without the other Party's written consent. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties' successors in interest. In the event of any dispute between the Parties regarding this Agreement, each Party shall pay its own attorney fees and costs. Each person executing this Agreement represents that he or she is authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of their respective entity. Time is of the essence. CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: Approved as to Form (si nare) r, yow,s Utc< ,a/'e/'(cf2441 (printed name and title) ''Lon i K. Lindell, City Attorney 4030 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 _ K:\BONDS\CAMPSGLN.CDW Kirkland, WA 98033 10-18-94 (206) 822-7700 -3- EXHIBIT "A" Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Project: Campus Glen Permit No: King Co. File #S89P0114/ Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and ILA90-PPO8 BPA Transmission Line and approxi- mately 8th Ave. S. & 4th Ave. S. , if extended AGREEMENT TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN WETLAND AND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN Basis for Agreement A. The undersigned Principal applied to King County ("County") under the Project name, Campus Glen ("Project") and under BALD File No. S89P0114 and to the City of Federal Way ("City") under Permit No. ILA90-PPO8 to construct certain improvements or perform work at certain real property previously located in King County, State of Washington, and after the date of the City's incorporation, located within the city limits of Federal Way, having an address more commonly known as between S. 328th St. and BPA Transmission Line and approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Ave. S. , if extended. ("Property") ; B. The City determined that a mitigation plan must be installed and maintained as a condition of preliminary plat approval granted August 17, 1993 pursuant to City of Federal Way Resolution No. 93-149; and C. The City will grant final plat approval only if the Principal agrees to install and maintain the mitigating measures set forth in the preliminary plat approval as more particularly described in that certain Wetland Planting Plan and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. , dated January 19, 1994 (Revised March 29, 1994) , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference ("Plan") . Terms of the Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, the Principal hereby agrees and binds itself, and its legal representatives, successors, and assigns, as follows: 1. Installation. Prior to final plat approval, but no later than December 1, 1994, the Principal shall complete all required mitigating measures in full compliance with the conditions of preliminary plat approval and the Plan, including any approved amendments thereto, and in conformance with accepted planting practice, in good soil with adequate water available, which improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City. 2 . Notice. The Principal shall notify the City in writing upon completion of all installation as described in the Plan. At such time, the Principal shall further provide, in writing, to the City, the dates the Principal will commence the mitigation observation and the dates it will submit each of the monitoring observation reports pursuant to Section 4 herein and as required by the Plan. 3 . BondJAssignment of Funds. The Principal shall provide to the City a Performance/Maintenance Bond, Assignment of Funds, or other security in form and content acceptable to the City to guarantee the Principal's performance of the installation and maintenance of the mitigation measures pursuant to this Agreement, and the Plan, to the City's satisfaction. 4 . Maintenance. The Principal shall maintain the improvements installed under the Plan so as to create healthy growing conditions for a period of five (5) years commencing on the date of completion of all installation described in the Plan. While maintenance may result in a partial release of any bond or other security posted by the Principal, at the City's election, the Principal recognizes its continuing duty to maintain the Plan as required by the King County Code or other applicable federal, state or local law. 5. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, install the improvements or perform the maintenance as required by this Agreement and the Plan, and upon demand, the Principal shall pay the City an amount equal to its costs and expenses in performing such installation or maintenance or the City shall be reimbursed its costs and expenses pursuant to any bond, assignment of funds or cash deposit posted by the Principal, at the City's election. 6. Indemnification. Principal agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Agreement, including without limitation, the City's performance of any maintenance or other work or construction of the improvements pursuant to Section 5 herein. 7. Remedies not Exclusive. No remedy provided for by this Agreement or any bond or other security posted by Principal shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to every other remedy available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. 8. General Provisions. This Agreement may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the parties. Any provisions of this Agreement which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default by the Principal shall not waive such breach or default. Each party shall pay its own attorney's fees and costs in connection with any lawsuit or other action relating to this -2- Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Principal's successors in interest, heirs and assigns. Time is of the essence. DATED effective this )`o day of October, 1994. PRINCIPAL: CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC. , Its General Partner By: (s i ture) 61.7. % • u /eft (printed name and title) 4030 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 (206) 822-7700 K:\BONDS\CAMSGLN.WL 10-18-94 -3- EXHIBIT A [ATTACH WETLAND AND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN] FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR: Campus Glen Limited Partnership RECORDERS USE: MAIL TO: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH • FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 ATTN: Margaret Clark LICENSE The undersigned owner of certain real property located in Federal Way, Washington and legally described as follows: [Legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference] ("Property") hereby grants an irrevocable license to the City of Federal Way ("City") and the City's agents, employees, contractors or representatives to enter upon the Property to inspect the construction of improvements, the performance of work or to allow the City to perform any necessary maintenance or work, all pursuant to Agreement to Install and Maintain Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan, Agreement to Install and Maintain Vegetative Buffer/Landscape Improvements Plan, Agreement to Monitor Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan, Cash Deposit Agreements and Assignment of Funds entered into between the City and the undersigned, which Agreements are incorporated herein by this reference. DATED this �_ day of October, 1994 . CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner By. (signatu(, Vet ) !/e e e/i mil— (printed name and title) STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ary h. F O ci 1 , is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed'this instfumen'l on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as V, 0.65i-di/hi- of BRENTVIEW, INC., which is General,Partner of POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, which is General Partner of CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN my hand and official seal thiseV! day of Oc ber, 1994. V,6-ki M- Some (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for tat- of Washington. K:\BONOS\CAMPSGLN.UC My commission expires� um i EXHIBIT "A" TO LICENSE • SURVEY DATA COfiRECTED LEGAL DESCRP 1ON FROM BASELINE ENGiNEERINGNC That portion of the North half of the Southwest quarter and that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and that portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, all in Section 17,, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying within the parcel described in a quit claim deed recorded under Recording No. 9308121901 and surveyed and I legally described by Terrell C. Ferguson, P.L.S., of Baseline Engineering Inc., in records of survey recorded in Volume 94 of Surveys at pages 141 and 141a and Volume 95 of Surveys at pages 116 and 116a, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of said Section 17; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said Section 17, a distance of 1,317.78 feet; THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East, a distance of 42.00 feet; THENCE South 88' 49' 37" East, a distance of 686.72 feet to the Northwest corner of King County Short Plat No. 580108 per Recording No. 8104300739. records of King County; Washington; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said King County Short Plat. a distance of 1,112.24 feet to a point on the Southerly right—of—way line of South 328th Street; THENCE South 75 27' 16" West along said Southerly right—of--way line, a distance of 25.00 feet to the Northwest corner of the Plat of West Highlands Division No. 1, as recorded in Volume 127 of Plats, pages 26 through 28, records of King County. Washington; THENCE South 01' 02' 38' West along the West line of said plat. a distance of 484.39 feet to the South line of said plat; • • THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East along the South line of said plat. .a distance of 14.69 feet to a tangent curve concave to the North having a radius of• 1,100.00 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 10' 24' 04", an arc distance of 199.69 feet to the Northeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142. per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County, Washington. said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said curve to the left having a radius of 1,100.00 feet, through a central angle of 76' 34' 24", an arc distance of 1.470.10 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of King County Short Plot No. 580108. per Recording No. 8104300739. records of King County. Washington; THENCE South 86' 34' 16" East along the South line of.Campus Green II. a condominium as recorded in Volume 53. of Condominiums at pages 96 through 97, records of•King County, Washington, a distance • • of 369.70 feet to the West line of the Plat of Heritage West. as recorded in Volume 91 of Plats, pages 11 and 12. records of King County. Washington; THENCE South 32' 34' 05" East along the West line of said plat. a distance of 239.16 feet to an angle point in said West line; THENCE South 36' 10' 33" East continuing along the West line of said plat, a distance of 157.41 feet • to an angle point in said West line of. said plat; THENCE South 23' 28' 12" West continuing along the West line of said plat. a distance of 105.00 feet to the Southerly line of South 327th Street as shown in said Plat of Heritage West. and 'a point of curvature with a tangent curve concave to the Northeast whose radius point bears North 23' 28' 12" East and is 380.00 feet distant; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 42' 17' 45", an arc distance of 280.52 feet to an angle point on said Southerly line of South 327th Street; THENCE South 18' 49' 33" East along the Westerly line of said South 327th Street and the Westerly line of Lot 61 of said Plot of Heritage West. a distance of 181.32 feet to the Northwesterly margin line of Bonneville Power Association Transmission Line right—of—way, Tacoma—Grand Coulee No. 1 recorded under . Recording Nos. 3131454, 3186542. 3252183, 4201227, 4660593, 5151465. and 5204177; THENCE South 52' 58' 44" West along said Northwesterly margin line, a distance of 1,803.52 feet to the Southeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142 per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County. Washington; THENCE North 37' 01' 16" West alone the East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 516.50 feet to an angle point in said East line; THENCE North 09' 21' 29" West continuing along said East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 299.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO easements, covenants. and restrictions of record. h Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Permit #:King Co. File #S89P0114 Project: Campus Glen Federal Way File #ILA90-PPO8 Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and Account Amount: $3,840.00 BPA Transmission Line and Cash Deposit Amount: $ 100.00 approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Avenue S., if extended CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CASH DEPOSIT AGREEMENT IN LIEU OF BOND FOR VEGETATIVE BUFFER/LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND TWO YEAR MAINTENANCE PERIOD THIS CASH DEPOSIT AGREEMENT IN LIEU OF BOND ("Agreement") is dated effective this 14th day of October, 1994. The parties ("Parties") to this Agreement are the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City") and the undersigned owner or applicant ("Applicant"). A. The Applicant is required to perform certain work, and/or construct and maintain certain improvements at the above-referenced property address located in Federal Way, Washington ("Property") in connection with Applicant's application under the above-referenced permit numbers and in accordance with an Agreement to Install and Maintain Vegetative Buffer/Landscape Improvements ("Landscape Agreement") entered into between the City and the Applicant of even date, which Landscape Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. B. The improvements will be constructed or the work will be performed in accordance with record drawings and approved plans on file with the City of Federal Way and specifically that certain Landscape Improvements Plan prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated August 15, 1994 ("Plans"); C. The City has determined that Applicant must post security with the City pursuant to Sections 22-146 through 22-159 of the Federal Way City Code ("FWCC") as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended, to guarantee Applicant's performance of required maintenance or repair and Applicant's performance of certain work or improvements pursuant to the Plans, as a condition of granting the permit. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1 . Amount of Cash Deposit. Pursuant to Section 22-149 of the FWCC that portion of this Agreement which is in lieu of a performance bond, shall be equal to one hundred and twenty percent (120%) of the cost of the work or improvements and that portion of this Agreement which is in lieu of a maintenance bond, shall be equal to thirty percent (30%) of the cost of replacing materials consisting of nursery plantings.. ORIGINAL 2. Cash Deposit. Applicant does hereby pay to the City the amount of Three Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Dollars and No/100 ($3,840.00) ("Cash Deposit"). The City shall deposit such Cash Deposit in its Performance Bond Account ("Account"). 3. Improvements. Applicant shall perform all work, improvements, and maintenance required pursuant to the Landscape Agreement and Plans, to the City's satisfaction. The maintenance obligation shall continue for two (2) years from the completion date of the improvements, or such longer period as required by the FWCC or other applicable law, rule or regulation. 4. Release. The Cash Deposit will only be repaid to Applicant if the City determines that (i) all the improvements have been constructed and installed and all work and maintenance performed to its satisfaction, in full compliance with the Landscape Agreement and Plans and all applicable local, state or federal law, and within the time period prescribed by the City, and (ii) Applicant has performed all its obligations under this Agreement. The City may release the Cash Deposit as follows: (a) Partial Release. Upon completion of the improvements in compliance with the foregoing provisions, the City will release seventy per cent (70%) of the cost of the materials consisting of nursery plantings, which amount is equal to Two Thousand Six Hundred Eighty- Eight Dollars and no/100 ($2,688.00), by issuing a check to Applicant. (b) Full Release. Two (2) years after completion of the improvements and performance of the maintenance program in compliance with the foregoing provisions, the City will release the remaining portion of the Cash Deposit, in the amount of One Thousand One Hundred Fifty- Two Dollars and no/100 ($1,152.00), by issuing a check to Applicant. 5. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, perform any of the necessary work in connection with the construction or completion of the improvements or performance of the maintenance required by the Landscape Agreement and Plans. The City may disburse the Cash Deposit to the City in an amount equal to all of the City's costs and expenses in performing such work. 6. Indemnification. Applicant agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Agreement, including without limitation, the City's performance of any maintenance or other work or construction of the improvements pursuant to Section 5 herein. 7. Administrative Cash Deposit. In addition to the amount of this Cash Deposit, Applicant agrees to pay an additional cash deposit to the City, pursuant to Section 22-151 of the FWCC, upon the execution of this Agreement equal to the amount of One Hundred Dollars and no/100 ($100.00). The administrative cash deposit may be used by the City to cover its actual expenses in administering this Agreement. 8. Remedies Cumulative. No remedy provided for by this Agreement shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to every other remedy available to the -2- City at law, in equity or by statute. Applicant agrees that its liability under this Agreement is not limited to the amount of the Cash Deposit. 9. License. The Applicant hereby grants to the City the irrevocable license and right to enter the Property in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "B", to inspect such work and install or maintain the required mitigation pursuant to the conditions of final plat approval and the Plans, as the City deems necessary, and at the City's election. The Applicant shall record such license with the King County Department of Records immediately upon the execution of this Agreement, at Applicant's expense. 10. General Provisions. This Agreement may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the Parties. Any provision of this Agreement which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default shall not waive such breach or default. This Agreement may not be assigned by either Party without the other Party's written consent. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties' successors in interest. In the event of any dispute between the Parties regarding this Agreement, each Party shall pay its own attorney fees and costs. Each person executing this Agreement represents that he or she is authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of their respective entity. Time is of the essence. CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: Approved as to Form (sin re) (printed name and title) , i y Attorney 4030 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 K:\BONDS\CAMPSGLN.CDL Kirkland, WA 98033 10-14-94 (206) 822-7700 -3- • EXHIBIT "A" Applicant: Campus Glen Limited Partnership Project: Campus Glen Permit No: King Co. File #S89P0114/ Property Address: Between S. 328th St. and ILA90-PPO8 BPA Transmission Line and approxi- mately 8th Ave. S. & 4th Ave. S. , if extended AGREEMENT TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN VEGETATIVE BUFFER/LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Basis for Agreement A. The undersigned Principal applied to King County ("County") under the Project name, Campus Glen ("Project") and under BALD File No. S89P0114 and to the City of Federal Way ("City") under Permit No. ILA90-PP08 to construct certain improvements or perform work at certain real property previously located in King County, State of Washington, and after the date of the City's incorporation, located within the city limits of Federal Way, having an address more commonly known as between S. 328th St. and BPA Transmission Line and approximately 8th Ave. S. and 4th Ave. S. , if extended. ("Property") ; B. The City determined that a vegetative buffer plan must be installed and maintained as a condition of preliminary plat approval granted August 17, 1993 pursuant to City of Federal Way Resolution No. 93-149; and C. The City will grant final plat approval only if the Principal agrees to install and maintain the mitigating measures set forth in the preliminary plat approval as more particularly described in that certain Landscape Improvements Plan prepared by Bargheusen Consulting Engineering, Inc. , dated August 15, 1994, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference ("Plan") . Terms of the Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, the Principal hereby agrees and binds itself, and its legal representatives, successors, and assigns, as follows: 1. Installation. Prior to final plat approval, but no later than December 1, 1994, the Principal shall complete all required mitigating measures in full compliance with the conditions of preliminary plat approval and the Plan, including any approved amendments thereto, and in conformance with accepted planting practice, in good soil with adequate water available, which improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City. 2 . Notice. The Principal shall notify the City in writing upon completion of all installation as described in the Plan. 3 . Bond/Assignment of Funds. The Principal shall provide to the City a Performance/Maintenance Bond, Assignment of Funds, or other security in form and content acceptable to the City to guarantee the Principal's performance of the installation and maintenance of the mitigation measures pursuant to this Agreement, and the Plan, to the City's satisfaction. 4 . Maintenance. The Principal shall maintain the improvements installed under the Plan so as to create healthy growing conditions for a period of two (2) years commencing on the date of completion of all installation described in the Plan. While maintenance may result in a partial release of any bond or other security posted by the Principal, at the City's election, the Principal recognizes its continuing duty to maintain the Plan as required by the King County Code or other applicable federal, state or local law. 5. Right to Complete Work. The City may, but in no event is it obligated to, install the improvements or perform the maintenance as required by this Agreement and the Plan, and upon demand, the Principal shall pay the City an amount equal to its costs and expenses in performing such installation or maintenance or the City shall be reimbursed its costs and expenses pursuant to any bond, assignment of funds or cash deposit posted by the Principal, at the City's election. 6. Indemnification. Principal agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) arising from, resulting, or connected with this Agreement, including without limitation, the City's performance of any maintenance or other work or construction of the improvements pursuant to Section 5 herein. 7. Remedies not Exclusive. No remedy provided for by this Agreement or any bond or other security posted by Principal shall be deemed exclusive, but shall be deemed cumulative and in addition to every other remedy available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. 8. General Provisions. This Agreement may not be amended except by written agreement signed by the parties. Any provisions of this Agreement which is declared invalid, shall not invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement. The failure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default by the Principal shall not waive such breach or default. Each party shall pay its own attorney's fees and costs in connection with any lawsuit or other action relating to this -2- Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Principal's successors in interest, heirs and assigns. Time is of the essence. DATED effective this AO day of October, 1994. PRINCIPAL: CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC. , Its General Partner By: (sig. . % r= (printed name and title) 4030 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98033 (206) 822-7700 K:\BONDS\CAMSGLN.LND 10-14-94 -3- EXHIBIT A [ATTACH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN] FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR: Campus Glen Limited Partnership RECORDERS USE: MAIL TO: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 ATTN: Margaret Clark LICENSE The undersigned owner of certain real property located in Federal Way, Washington and legally described as follows: [Legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference] ("Property") hereby grants an irrevocable license to the City of Federal Way ("City") and the City's agents, employees, contractors or representatives to enter upon the Property to inspect the construction of improvements, the performance of work or to allow the City to perform any necessary maintenance or work, all pursuant to Agreement to Install and Maintain Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan, Agreement to Install and Maintain Vegetative Buffer/Landscape Improvements Plan, Agreement to Monitor Wetland and Buffer Mitigation Plan, Cash Deposit Agreements and Assignment of Funds entered into between the City and the undersigned, which Agreements are incorporated herein by this reference. DATED this __ day of October, 1994 . CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, Its General Partner By: BRENTVIEW, INC., Its General Partner By:. (signet 6u::j l'fvvrc� !/rte (printed name and title) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �a ,4. yy 1ou) , is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this insttumenO on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as V44. Pycsietb i- of BRENTVIEW, INC., which is General Partner of POLYGON NORTHWEST COMPANY, which is General Partner of CAMPUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN my hand'and official seal this��% day of Oc ber, 1994. Ste. V/cki M- Sou/c (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and K:\BONOS\CAMPSGLN.UC My commission expires th;�tat•5f Washington. nil n,, EXHIBIT "A" TO LICENSE • • SURVEY DATA CORRECTED LEGAL DESC iP ION FROM BAS8..rlE Elm INC. That portion of the North half of the Southwest quarter and that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and that portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, all in Section 17,, Township 21 North, Range 4 East. W.M., King County, Washington, lying within the parcel described in a quit claim deed recorded under Recording No. 9308121901 and surveyed and Ilegally described by Terrell C. Ferguson. P.LS., of Baseline Engineering Inc., in records of survey recorded in Volume 94 of Surveys at pages 141 and 141a and Volume 95 of Surveys at pages 116 and 116a, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of said Section 17; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said Section 17, a distance of 1.317.78 feet; THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East, a distance of 42.00 feet; THENCE South 88' 49' 37" East, a distance of 686.72 feet to the Northwest corner of King County Short Plat No. 580108 per Recording No. 8104300739, records of King County; Washington; THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 1.112.24 feet to a point on the Southerly right—of—way line of South 328th Street; THENCE South 75' 27' 16" West along said Southerly right—of—way line, a distance of 25.00 feet to the Northwest corner of the Plat of West Highlands Division No. 1, as recorded in Volume 127 of Plats. pages 26 through 28. records of King County, Washington; • THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said plat. a distance of 484.39 feet to the South line of said plat; - THENCE South 88' 57' 22" East along the South line of said plat..a distance of 14.69 feet to a tangent curve concave to the North having a radius of 1,100.00 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 10' 24' 04", an arc distance of 199.69 feet to the Northeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142, per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County. Washington, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said curve to the left having a radius of 1,100.00 feet, through a central angle of 76' 34' 24", an arc distance of 1.470.10 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of King County Short Plat No. 580108, per Recording No. 8104300739, records of King County, Washington; THENCE South 86' 34' 16" East along the South line of Campus Green II, a condominium as recorded in Volume 53. of Condominiums at pages 96 through 97, records of•King County, Washington, a distance of 369.70 feet to the West line of the Plat of Heritage West, as recorded in Volume 91 of Plats, pages 11 and 12. records.of King County. Washington; THENCE South 37 34' 05" East along the West line of said plat, a distance of 239.16 feet to an angle point in said West line; THENCE South 36' 10' 33" East continuing along the West line of said plat. a distance of 157.41 feet to an angle point in said West line of said plat; • THENCE South 23' 28' 12" West continuing along the West line of said plat, a distance of 105.00 feet to the Southerly line of South 327th Street as shown in said Plat of Heritage West, and a point of curvature with a tangent curve concave to the Northeast whose radius point bears North 23' 28' 12" East and is 380.00 feet distant; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 42' 17' 45", an arc distance of 280.52 feet to an angle point on said Southerly line of South 327th Street; • THENCE South 18' 49' 33" East along the Westerly line of said South 327th Street and the Westerly line of Lot 61 of said Plat of Heritage West, a distance of 181.32 feet to the Northwesterly margin line of Bonneville Power Association Transmission Line right—of—way. Tacoma—Grand Coulee No. 1 recorded under • Recording Nos. 3131454, 3186542, 3252183, 4201227, 4660593. 5151465, and 5204177; THENCE South 52' 58' 44" West along said Northwesterly margin line, a distance of 1,803.52 feet to the Southeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 278142 per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County. Washington; THENCE North 37' 01' 16" West along the East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 516.50 feet to an angle point in said East line; THENCE North 09' 21' 29" West continuing along said East line of said King County Short Plat. a distance of 299.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOrETHER. WITH..AND SUBJECT TO easements, covenants, and restrictions of record. J 4558--EX7 Gate/Time: 07 /05/7ggq 7507 scale p 0 O m N ➢ m m r y TT .17y m r W O n C m ti Z O 1,1 Z I I I I I I C I 1 O %1 � U � C�J u 'Ti 2� LI— ❑-D I O L y_Z < C o 3J 7 om V � � Z Q t0 ti m p to n m 1 O� (n O NC) D IZm o�x <oo 0E<-X 00N z0 T1Z O D Z O CO 2 m In --I g a m z a T IIZ01'LsXY112-'Ii�i`li7 uOISIAaa 'JddV I pM3 bF M31/38 )-LID 83d 03SIAM I OcH I OdH SLW M31A38 kL13 213d (13SIA38 OdH OdH SiN M3V38 ),L10 aid 03SIA38 9dH OdH -Idl N w W W F- U J J Zw A (N Nt U 00, WW WWZP ZZzaZ¢ -�U¢- �UUP- wn0-00lQi QmUmwwUS--�X .4Z o Z O W zz O z Of ln a1-DEWW O 0:: F- w a w U 3 0W LLj 0}=WocJ LL,ce O N Lgmo ace¢ Q d < z Ln Q�ti zO z W N g3 w� > =�0 ¢�¢ g w N ~ N W U O}(n U�W W QF W W P w 0 V) J W w z COu WUf'• U W Z z Z L,<W n � UJ 0 w Z W 3 J = mN (nZW ,z N Of m J Z Uj W m=1 Fu- ry UJ 0w U-w U(nW W Z Fmhy-mQF :®1M 001-L-2:Z8 (90i;) CC086 ` M `PUI81A-Al)i L0Z ads S `:IN 'PAle 11818M �Gy�piB-yp " 0�0t7 N � >3Wz 0 J xW o_a�W-a� Wp=_�O zU3�(D J Z Q O ¢�� no azy~z UOO Z fN <Z� a w Q W W WU d'W � 0<Cf62 WU d U OuQ ZOm 0 a a �w¢w o�=o= a � L6 ..I Z H D 0 1 OW wo ui < LLOo J wC7 z Z=a�-UO L Z O� (R=QOC70 O N N rn p= Z FOwW� 2 Uao0 W z w OWCE QmULJO ryry {i 9 F- JQN e In W W=Ujj0~ ^ < Z Q Z n ae U Q W a -zoo Z oWoZ ON iQmLn a I W a 1 On Ona. K H O LO a GO I w Q z Z > / to O I 00 itWn ujw m m Q 3 g {I m y O M W \ V/N b6 b L Z a}o0 it01JOA -�YdH panOJddV AS=,L 1-7cTR— pa�Oa43 IDIUOzuOH -nK-- umoic] .J®=j :aIOOS -ng- pau6isao U rl S30IM3S 1d1N3WN0alAN3 '0W,3A ns '9NINNVId aNVI 'ONI633NION3 TAI3 Xd-j Z8L8—lSZ(90Z) ZZZ9— lSZ(90Z) N086 bM '1NIA Hinos inN]Ab aNZL 9lZ8l L� O 2 0 �Wmm O awam U 1 J � 15; W �Zz z� _O V~l w O O U n z x ao J a>Ow N Z �W W.) O U La awe U EL 20<aio - % z x x x x N Q N U IV Z IZ /\ 0 a 9 a U U"z_ w w U Q m Xb� 9o1nr }aa4S ,' r JagwnN qOf m W O Q uNr��z f�uLGH M V LGH G i5AaOM 4 ---1 I A4e JE 6f2 ,pe 2' MUI.c.H,roMPaG�p� � D T • i�Mo V>: G4Nr • a : e o �" aiNe�.t,hcoa�—A. 1 B C, 'r �I te�n�, FF�r OlY(GIRL;�Ir.Y� o CcA.1ppU`['ED oRb4hlIG �'�0>r 'iR+4d�0� c GOr�rPoc«v t'To IZ^oEYr+t ITIoht To ��✓roll� L�h'r}♦nN 1(�qL. 1 G-WL, GoNTp.ffJE>z� �,� GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL -Tz• I+ocsiaK�.Ff.� aR lsL) If'tZF.G4VIR�D,Ca?(5'fb �E �-�.�S�DP2L� - Gofi"oil Gl/�iH �i"iO4° +i of y «doh"/fljla2lC \ '1V ct \ -5t, pe-eF ;�(4' ial - v�-T� R /pi FZ Gv�IGJI� �.D OP- �c�A�-- �`iL�IJP �'-4" t765P OR6ANIe �I�7'IrttU EJC�a?.nAj'IoN ;✓cZuat,ro �}Tln-t>� �C�L'IO++EI(iNr i��1"?��u��a o�Ptaftil5a• Told of Mina.. �T zq- �µrr�- �riont PLANTING IN EXISTING VEGETATION LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVAL Permit Number: K e g gq Po ltwio a �L/k 9D- PloB Approved By: _�� U Date: Comments: (94Ji1"i F�ZI/+" G✓rtau��l�G�b.�?V _..........✓�...... _......._...!/�. / ,rl / I rail i �r P d��O ll� lUiFOI�IUt� t•-1 2q • �O� �,A� G G ` ef TRACT "I" TRAIL ACCESS 1" = 20' 7/ t 20' vN 105-7 K/ ev e; G'\/I, r047— -r-;E� c—zJcjTlrti v, Z IL W 8 WWM 0 N 0 W � a U M g Z yaU m J Y 20' BUFFER VEGETATION ENHANCEMENT PLAN W 0 0) D a. TT N U � O M w W Z /� W O 1 F- Cv. 0 00 .-. CID Z ca c J c Y 0 J a O O LL 1J 0 0 u $ ¢ U r Z (n d E Z 0 v � N O, 3r Y p — 0 a U ¢ _ N LLJ (.5 U � Z j Z aY o gN W J d ¢ az az X Q Z Z W g Q N N Z (D ONO z— az az 00 m (No 0 z n Q I I LLJ z� Lr) L Z f C4 (O C4 (.0 w 04 00 Y O C N 00 O qqt to (rrl Q 1" = 50' FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET 8 48 0 R=268 67 FT / Off- /% / �i j/ / j /; ! 1 L-164.12 FT N 93- EDGE WETLAND 0 IV iv 20' w a. ... ............ . . ....... cd 63 93 X, 000 A 9 C3 0 Q PT SIA= a 4) cj) 0.Ld W K) 0. :Nkg .50 .... ...................... a. 346. ot 0: 0: co co • SEE NOTE ON co CURB RAMP Xl Cis A� SHEET 13 (TY 91 61 @ 8 8 ■ le 4 asp 00mul V) 41 X .... . ... 57 LF 1 Er COEP 0 1 10% z it 0: iq (OVERFLOW) WIDE DRAI cd 22' C NAGE .0 EASEMENT TO CITY #12 33+ 4. 0 7��T p PER KqRS DWG/ -5 :' -1 -&. L. iRlYtWAY AP4ACH CEN�TEk-OF 7/11 A I ......... ..... 7-- RUHR 7"1 /EL=341�. I or XXXXX= T p ?L RX x 1% 7 A .:E' ZZ x 0: co 3 o �i C4. 350.04 5t'21 12 WIDE •DRfVEWAY 49-40 APPFiOAI* PER KCRS z -4=* a: SHEET 13 >4 �4+0 00w 4D 'l- S 52*5 C4 (A 347. DWG. #12 S 52'58!447 W 165.00' 6. 550.00, BOLLArS PER . .... .... .. . . . .. ............... .... ..... . i . ... ....... .. ..... . ....... . .0- IN X 49+05�97. :L' .. . I , -2Y 7 DETAIL i SHE 35+.65.00. CB#21 347. 9 . cow -24! CPEP. 149 LF 220 LF t407 It 4PEP 0 0.94� 4+ O� 26 LF 112� CPER 0, .9�1 �-857, COA 349-40 08 ,k CURB RAMP PER 34 .17 37 LF 12*, C DEP 0 1.01%, C.01 NOTE, SHEET 13 ego RIM=352.40 0 04 LIGHT STANDARD 240 LF 1 t CPE..' w ru ZW 0 2.98% POWER VAULT OD (MICAL) 2' WIDE ASPHALT DIA. PVC PIPE GAS STUB LJ w PER icn PAVED D/W. 0 1% MIN. FOR THE "CAL) (TYPICAL) POWER STUB SECTION DETAIL -ONNECTION OF DOWNSPOUTS . ..... ... .. ..... . AND FOOTIN6'DRAJNS.- SEE cl) cv) 48.92 DETAIL SHEET 13 (TYP) '51 V-11 1 54 53 \ I g 8 2 • �5 PVC ADAPTER REQUIRED 5 La ct) 0 STRUCTURES (rrpc&). 0 . . ... ........ . 4 w 12' WIDE PATHWAY ..... . 55 z co 0 W/20 ASPHALT CLASS 'B' TC. 5 9111\ 57 56 PAVEMENT OVER In CS SUBGRADE > 04 04 Go — — — — — — — — — — — — --- • /� a �� Z 0 > CV ............... —20' TREE RETENTION BUFFER I.... .. ..... . . ........... I ... . ... ....... . . .... . Jk c!) ca 0 .1 IL 0 0 LL 0 . ..... . S 5758144 W 1803.52' J j N .............. w . . . . . . . . . . . 0 VVV S. 331ST PL. .0 .. . .... . . . . . . . ...... .. ..... . .......... ................ .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365 .. ... ...... ......... . ......... . ............... .365 2001 Y.C. SSD=2l6 c As-mjLr cEmFmTK)t* HEREBYCOMFYTHATLTHE HORIZONTAL AND' VERTICAL. CATKINS .OF THE. sToku nizAmar ANn RnAn qyqrru.qwvm . . . . C3 L) 0 r— INDEX TO SET3 3 T T 99 5 112' , \\ 1 OF 19 Overall Plan and Index CAMPUS GLEN%107 2 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Plan/Profile S. 328th PI. (n r rn 3 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Plan/Profiles S. 328th PI. W O� z 1 l3 4 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Plan/Profile S. 330th Pl. A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 AND NW 1/4 5 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Plan/Profile S. 330th Pl. 3 o (ru) 324TH PL S 6 i 7 6 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Plan/Profile S. 330th PI. Y �zAND THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TWP. 21N. 108 `T 7 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Plan/Profile S. 330th PI. 3 f \ 114 \\ 50- 10 8 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Plan/Profile 4th R. S. D -� s �� RGE. 4E., W.M. �, 9 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Plan/Profile 6th PI. S. � 6 109 I 10 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Plan/Profile S. 331st PI. '3 51 11 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Plan/Profile S. 331st Pl. -� 12 OF 19 Tract "k" Pond ' 9 13 OF 19 Roadway and Drainage Notes and Details ITE 110 i �\ 14 OF 19 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan (WEST HALF) ,. .\\, ,.%112 \ 52 \\ 15 OF 19 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan (EAST HALF) '� �` '�� I 53 ' \\ - 10 , 16 OF 19 Erosion Control Notes & Details S `, , \\ w 7 17 OF 19 Pond and Tract Sections 9 18 OF 19 Restrictive Area Map �� g)4, `fF •, 8 '// , ' \ 19 OF 19 Restrictive Area Map 99 "" 10 11 '` 111 54 -\\ �,,• ," .wo �rwvr�w 12 SURVEY DATA rl S, 6 CORRECTED LEGAL D�PR0N FROM BASELINE 8 10 NC 336TH ST 55 That portion of the North half of the Southwest quarter and that portion of the Southwest quarter of the 13 `, \ Northeast quarter and that portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, all in Section 17, VICINITY MA ijj 5 w '�� \ �\ \ 58 Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying within the parcel described in ST• SHEET 7 \ 1 '/' I 1 ,` `, \, ` a quit claim deed recorded under Recording No. 9308121901 and surveyed and legally described by Terrell SCALE: 1"=3600' S 328TH r. - $ 3 `` \ C. Ferguson, P.L.S., of Baseline Engineering Inc., in records of survey recorded in Volume 94 of Surveys _ 14`�`,`, 59 \Q I',� \'t 56 , > at pages 141 and 141a and Volume 95 of Surveys at pages 116 and 116a, described as follows: 1 4 19 i�$1 9 1, 57 I COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of said Section 17; \ 1`, '�� \\ \ 21 THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said Section 17, a distance of 1,317.78 feet; \ \ 14 THENCE South 86 57' 22" East, a distance of 42.00 feet; f 7 ' __k//'/ THENCE South 88' 49' 37' East, a distance of 686.72 feet to the Northwest corner of King County Short 20 18 t7 18 15 '``\` 60 Plat No. 580108 per Recording No. 8104300739, records of King County, Washington; \ ll - , •, - ` \\ 2p0 ,\ THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of SHL IET 6 " "'"`°'•""" '° - SH 1,112.24 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way line of South 328th Street; - "'�° ..,,, 15 ,�,�, _ ��\\ THENCE South 75' 27' 16" West along said Southerly right-of-way line, a distance of 25.00 feet to the , 19 \\ \ Northwest corner of the Plat of West Highlands Division No. 1. as recorded in Volume 127 of Plats, pages i - Y , , 32�Tk pL ,w ll f 2 r 1 .,�•...•..- 8 26 through 28, records of King County, Washington; \� .,,.. ,. ..-�, 11 \\ \\\ \ THENCE South 01' 02' 38" West along the West line of said plat, a distance of 484.39 feet to the South \\ 29 1 17 `\ 1 line of said plat; ^'-* 27 128 16 THENCE South 8; 57' 22" East along the South line of said plat, a distance of 14.69 feet to a tangent - t 25 26 1 _ \ 9 64 \\ SHEET 2 curve concave to the North having a radius of 1,100.00 feet; 1 23 _ r't \ \ THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 10' 24' 04", on arc distance of 199.69 feet to the Northeast comer of King County Short Plat No. 278142, per Recording No. 7808180704, records of King County, Washington, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said curve to the left having a radius of. 1,100.00 feet, through a central angle \ \ 84 63 \v 33 333 8JN non i X 00 000 Z �5 000 Z W W r o. a as I� Z min itMM VJ � � F 12el a CL`'. a. D 0 J 0 0 0 W W M W W W Z msN SNN SN _N GI � lrI GI 41 � KK 4(Q: Q 0 U XXQ. XXT aaaxxx v Q Z CL CLOCK K C) W _J nn�w�a O rnrnrnrno,a \\\\\ n ONO a,Go 8 N \ C11 1r) 17 4t+ in of 76' 34' 24", an arc distance of 1,470.10 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of King County Short Tee/ _ Plat No..580108, per Recording No. 8104300739, records of King County, Washington; / THENCE South 86' 34' 16" East along the South line of Campus Green II, a condominium as recorded in / / ^"` �"� `N 62 \\ Volume 53 of Condominiums at pages 96 through 97, records of King County, Washington, a distance / # f 40 61 \ \\ 0 of 369.70 feet to the West line of the Plat of Heritage West, as recorded in Volume 91 of Plats, pages 11 36 N 8 rj 7 \ \ N and 12, records of King County, Washington; 83 38 B \ \\ THENCE South 32' 34' 05" East along the West line of said plat, a distance of 239.16 feet to an angle .. ^ \ . point in said West line; - w ,. * I \ THENCE South 36' 10' 33" East continuing along the West line of said plat, a distance of 157.41 feet 82 a' QV n ♦+ w. ,..«.++•�•�" O Ao on angle point in said West line of said plat; ,. THENCE South 23' 28' 12" West continuing along the West line of said plat, a distance of 105.00 feet ' t e 'A to the Southerly line of South 327th Street as shown in said Plat of Heritage West, and a point of curvature with a tangent curve concave to the Northeast whose radius point bears North 23' 28' 12" East 81 7 34 41 LL V' co and is 380.00 feet distant; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 42' 17' 45". an arc distance of 280.52 feet to an angql�e point on said Southerly line of South 327th Street; \3 �' V/ O THENCE South IF 49' 33' East along the Westerly line of said South 327th Street and the Westerly line CO. / * x� of Lot 61 of said Plat of Heritage West, a distance of 181.32 feet to the Northwesterly margin line of 'y0• �,.. \\ " w 42 Bonneville Power Association Transmission Line right-of-way, Tacoma -Grand Coulee No. 1 recorded under Qjv • \so 2 g ♦ Recording Nos. 3131454, 3186542, 3252183, 4201227. 4660593, 5151465, and 5204177; 11Q w THENCE South 52' 58' 4e West along said Northwesterly margin line, a distance of 1,803.52 feet to i�,�N '�� HEFT 5—�` \ R the Southeast corner of King County Short Plat No. 276142 per Recording No. 7808180704, records of S EET, 1 `�44 King County, Washington; WAS 12 97 THENCE North 37' 01' 16" West along the East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance of 516.50 vOX, 0 �0 Jf. feet to an angle point in said East line. . v ✓ M THENCE North 09' 21' 29" West continuing along said East line of said King County Short Plat, a distance r� t 45 SHEET I I O W of 299.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. { " 1j 91 / TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO easements, covenants, and restrictions of record. 96 / - �' `, M 47 Z BABIB OF EEAfa4Cls �_—`. ,,, C Record of survey by Baseline Engineering Inc. Recorded in volume 95 of surveysat pages 116 and 116A, records of King County Washington. 8 / NESTING BOX .. ' J +* I Y 6 CD VBif1CAL DATUM •. 68 4 '' 94 4 I i 49 LOCATION (TYPICAL OF 3) � � t J KCAS Cd BENCHMARK CL North rim of centerline intersection monument case at South 336th street and 6th avenue South, per Sea, Inc. 51 9 boundary and topographic for Rainier National Bank dated . N(pG - 68 £- 8 • w'� 3 4 O E ems. ° 0 December, 1979. Their job no. 1-109-003-791. 8 k ` Elevation = 316.95' - _ 69 ��`� 64 52 % TRACTDESCRPTIONB --- --i �'� 70\ T $ 1 /y Tract "A": Joint access d -- Tract "B": Greater than 40% slope az ° ° -<: 62 �+" 8 3 ° L• . 71 J� 63 o o Tract "C": Wetland a q�/j-,� e 2, , ;o ° 2, •(\ a ° �f ,�\\\ 54 ,F G.J a N t \ Tract "D": Wetland SIDEWAI.KJ °�� • `-,SIDEWALK. it �i �� ;\� m A l� rX = �N z l Tract "E": Wetland �,". ° _ ..• _ ,..� Tract "F": Joint access d Tract "G": Wetland .' 8 Tract "H": Joint access MAILBOX CLUSTER STREET `�� i73 S Tract 'F: Pedestrian access i / ,.� ��.. • O Tract "J": Storm Drainage %� `� - WQQp STRUCTURE„/ 1 75 I k'. ', ,' ; K ��\� \ ;. ' 57 ,�G� l �. $ YCA MAII®o+r , . ; 6, � x a o MALBOX LOCATION NOTES Nor To srA r EX. STORMDRAINa -sz----- xx 15 EX. SEWER — Indicates mailbox mounting location with number of Type I mailboxes. See King /Ss �r \�� SH 1� .�/'��P I EX WATER---"'""""�--------'"" � j �Eyy � 59� 1 W County STD.DWG No. 24 for details. The locations shown have been approved by the \� \ , Federal Way postmaster. Contractor shall verify exact location with postmaster at time _ \ r ____ of construction. The number references how many mail boxes are to be installed. SHEET 4 " \ \ 1 EX. CONTOURS — 346 "\yX +�� i 12" So WE SPE-091CATIONS TRAOUT so, � PROPOSED STORMDRAIN in Total Site Area 1,341.393 SF = 30.79 AC. New Right of Way Area 227,358 SF = 5.22 AC. •��\�� Tract 'A' Area 2,485.62 SF = 0.057 AC. Tract 'B' Area 8,403.37 SF = 0.193 AC. Tract 'C' Area 53,720.79 SF = 1.23 AC. Tract 'D' Area 10,632.01 SF = 0.244 AC. Tract 'E' Area 51,605.03 SF = 1.185 AC. Tract 'F' Area 3.034.90 SF = 0.070 AC. Tract 'G' Area 106,760.26 SF = 2.451 AC. \\\ Tract 'H' Area 1,930.22 SF - 0.044 AC. Tract 'I' Area 2,589.10 SF = 0.059 AC.. Tract 'J' Area 7,682.56 SF = 0.176 AC:. / 4. Total Lot Area 863.112.16 SF = 19.814 AC. 4'P Total Lots 98 SPECIAL NOTES NESTING BOX LOCATION (TYPICAL OF 3) 1. Lots 85 through 98 shall have 6" pvc downspout connection pipes installed 0 1% minimum slope, 4. 'Building setbacks and native growth protection easements (NGPE) to decks, outbuildings, �Q•G O�y� and discharge directly into tract 'C'. The downstream pipe ends shall stub at the buffer line as for Structures, rill and obstructions (including, but not limited patios, or overhangs beyond 18 inches) are prohibited within the building setback line (BSBL) and restricted G delineated in the field. Contractor shall construct dispersion trench at outlet of biofiltration swale from lot 92, lot 86 shall obtain 10' wide floodplains (if applicable), and within any Native Growth Protection Easement(s) as established during 4,Q• energy dissipation. Lot 93 shall obtain 10' wide easement G easement from lot 85, lot 90 shall obtain 10' wide easement from lot 91, and lot 98 shall obtain engineering plan review. ^�P 10' Wide easement from lot 97. Dedication of Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) conveys to the public beneficial interest I 2. Any fencing constructed along any street shall include a landscaped area placed along the outside iv vegetation for all a in the land within the easement. This interest includes the preservation of native 9 `C2G0 perimeter of each fence. This shall be placed on the face of the plat prior to final plat purposes that benifit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and recording. Adjacent property owners shall be responsible for the continued maintenance of erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal subject landscaping. (Plat approval condition No. 13). habitat. The NGPE imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land, subject to 3. All storm drainage conveyance pipe designated on the drawings as 'SO' shall be one of the the easement, the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Federal Way, to leov following pipe material alternates: undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement. The vegetation within the easemen 11 conform to the requirements of ASTM C-14 Class II a. Concrete storm sewer pipe she q - be cut pruned, covered b fiN, removed or damaged without express permission fro may not ,pre Y Federal Way, must be obtained in writing from the City of Fe I Way ` ` 18 ` non -reinforced bell and spigot with rubber gaskets (with bell flush with C8 wall if the city of which permission Department of Community Development or its successor agency. \ \ used). \ b. Smooth wall spiral rib metal pipe (aluminum, aluminized steel, or asphalt -treated steel). Before and during the course of any grading, building construction, or other dev pment activity along ` \ 16 Gauge with 3/4-inch x 5/8-inch ribs on 12-inch center. - any lot subject to the NGPE, the common boundary between the easement the area of developmepK` C. ADS Type N-12 (or equivalent) high -density polyethylene corrugated pipe with an activity must be fenced or otherwise marked to the salisfation of the Ci of Federal Way or its \ \ \\ integrally formed smooth interior to the requirements of 4.ASHT0 M-294. successor agency." \ d. Minimum pipe cover shall be 2.0 feet. 19 \ e. Pipe may be any of the above provided: \ \ 1. Pipe joints must be of the same materials, and shall be rubber gasketed, and \ \ 2. Where a pipe rnnler;nl in specifically shown on the plan, that moterlal must be used. \ 16 I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 ' I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 p9 �6U LOT 1 J. Sqf !4 OF V4 o LOT 2 IT ` � m \ •As ei o r nERmc a Tim I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS OF THE STORM DRAINAGE AND ROAD SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS THE RESULT OF A FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDE MY IRECTION. 2)3 Z5 -.- NAME L.S. NO. DATE: PROPOSED SEWER J�LSS Z v PROPOSED WATER 8 W _........ zUJ (10 in PROPOSED CONTOURS ----348------- W a- r PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVING Z Lai Z w LLJ 000NDO ZM ,• > (10 00 PROPOSED CONC. SIDEWALK �' . N W w 3 In 111 c9 z 04CN w PROPOSED GRAVEL ROAD N Z Nco co CID Ld ZO'O I� Y v� U in PLAT BOUNDARY PROPOSED FLOW DIRECTION —Z-- C1 MONUMENTS LOCATED AT PC, PT, O (/•�� s6� AND INTERSECTIONS J Z PROPOSED MAILBOX LOCATIONS Q t9 2 IW �2 GRUB (S►b Jv Sy/ ® PERMIT NO. ILA90—PPW 8 coo CITY OF FEDER4L WAY 0 75 0 � r AS -BUILT E f ERA A4 i to Q,qTEE. . 03 03 C�S � � t ' J l D is rl 6 � � otfi i l r I K- J / -, Iansc P 40 9� i SNmh` � 1 �, p s �` ti y r � � 13 oa�o-• �` Sol+• ✓lr•, '3' ,$, /' o< pPf PLANTSCHEDULE TRACT., Symbol Scientific Name Common Name Size Quantity © Thuja plicata Western red 314' 42 P I IV � cedar ® Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 3'-4' 7 L Acer circinatum Vine maple 3'-4' 7 J� U. Wi Pow Salix spp. Willot s slips l 0 i> I P t? I,) OCornus stolonifera Red•ossier dogwood 3 gal I -6t F-111D Scirpus macrocarpus Bulrush br 120 Cov en Carex obnupta Slough sedge br 85 1 e I pi J L u LLGi Typha latifolia Cattail ?h 170,. gal owbt,•y b�. s?ccta,�2,);S b1 t?d Hvdrosecd Mix FrJuca pratensis Meadow fescue 67% Agrostis alba Bentgrass 16% Alopecurus pratensi$ Meadow foxtail ' 16% Pell- i2td t i 31Zj dtxjv-,I:6A Looi, l —I b RECEIVED br�t�ge-rzedtiC er�oe) �-,,I - ro N04 �v " C6� Ww� C �-tti� t S 22✓� CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. i r 1 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. Prior to beginning any work, a preconstruction meeting will be held for review of procedures, project scheduling and availability of plant materials. Representatives of the City of Federal Way, project owner, participating general and landscape contractors and the wetland biologist should attend this meeting. This plan has been prepared by Terra Associates. At least two days notice of the intent to begin work should be given to Terra Associates before work adjacent to wetland areas is begun. - 2. Wetland biologist should provide periodic observation services during construction, to observe implementation of the mitigation plan. Welland biologist will be available to make design adjustments depending on conditions encountered during construction. Upon completion of the work a report will be prepared documenting work completed. 3. Contractor shall be responsible to providet sound, healthy vigorous plants without defects. Contractor will provide irrigation for new plant materials as necessary and shall warrant survivability of plants for one year after acceptance of planting. 4. Prior to beginning grading work, grading limits should be identified in the field and appropriate markers installed to indicate limits of work. Clearing;limits should be confirmed by wetland biologist and adjusted as may be necessary to preserve existing vegetation. Contactor will use construction methods that will cause minimal disturbance to vegetation to be preserved. Before beginning excavation in the mitigation area contractor should identify access ppints and construction sequence which minimizes disturbance. 5. Grading work within surface water compensation area and in Tract C may be scheduled at any season All disturbed surfaces should be stabilized by hydroseeding. 6. Plantings of nursery stock may be made depending on availability from suppliers. Some plan[ materials may not be available during summer months and planting can be delayed until the winter dormant period. Willow slips can only be planted during the dormant season November through April. 7. See Grading Plans prepared by Barghausen Engineers for additional construction details and details for work adjacent to the NGPE areas. Prior to beginning site clearing and grading, NGPE areas should.ba identified and clearly marked to avoid inadvertent clearing within protected areas. Clearing limits for Compensating surface water storage area should be marked. 8. Project should be monitored for a five year period following completion of the work. Wetland biologist should reexamine project during early summer and prepare monitoring reports to be submitted to Federal Way. Monitoring reports shall address survivability of plants and any recommendations for maintenance or remediation. Terra Associate% report dated January 19, 1994 addresses monitoring requirements. 9. All planting and seeding activities sl all conform to normal landscape industry standards. 10. Contractor shall be responsible for providing irrigation as may be necessary to assure plant survival. 11. Plant substitutions may be possible v ith approval of wetland biologist. Any substitutions will be native to the Puget Sound region. Plant materials available on site, particularly willow slips from filled wetlands may he used to suppl@mcnt or replace some nursery stock. 12. Compacted soils along sanita.n ,nwr line in Tmet C should lie overexcavated by 12" and replaced by topsoil strippings collected from other areas of tht: site. Topsoil identified of use should be examined to determine possible inclusions of blackberry roots. 13. Compensating storage area should be overexcavated by 12" to allow placement of topsoil to finish grades. There should be variation in the grade across the bottom of the area as shown. Plantings in the area should be made in accordance with the depth variation. Emergent herbaceous species should be planted in the deeper sections and willow in shallower sections. r 14. Topsoil for use in compensating storage area should be identified prior to beginning mass grading for project. Soil should be collected from area free of reed canary grass which could compete with desired plant species.` l5. Non native weedy species including. Scot'4s broom, Himalayan blackberry, and reed canary grass should be removed at time of construction work. Control measures should also be provided during five year monitoring period to eliminate non native weedy species. 16. Plant locations as shown are approximate Orly and should be adjusted in field at time of planting. IT Install temporary construction signs identifying the NGPE limits. Signs shall have minimum dimensions of 2' x 3' and be maintained during construction and until permanent split rail fence along NGPE line is installed. Signs shall be lettered: NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT LIMITS Wetland revegetation work in progress. No grading, clearing or wheeled vehicle access pennitted. 3 r� • V N 0 2 O O NJ �v G/i u e W s � a Qa c " o Uw r V U W C Or�� to y c L ao c U o c rw c R N Y OG = v° 9 l I d `. — ..I 3 N a C O Z 7 m C fa' V 0 co Z CU ZO N r ^ vC: � LL ate. U ~ Z f) Q EO W E U d a S ' � J d a t N to 2 of (30 89 , '''' — — ; NGPE TRACT C 88--CPasemen+ U)OS PIOLAej ©�le\yt-NO C+1A/Ufe S. 87 91 TIF �� _— t/ Y"�/ ` _ � © � moo~ b� C _ _ - -_— ._ �• ` / , SC`d i —�__ ' /O — �7/ 1 —_— \ O..J �,� -gxtSCr�=��y =^✓ / — j•• I -- G� �u�wS 5yec�0.Ltli5 (Sc1. b:rry� 1: 11 1 1 oLlc: ✓erexco�o Corn oc to Soi \ \ \ � ''' � So, 11 OVPr S ao;�,- 1 RP/4,e wiz :z'' iloor,il WETLAND LIMITS ' ti 92 95 96 00 \. 00 97 gq a 4' /J;, �, F, --- - ------ 4� NGPE /;" 1s NGPE TRACT E PLANTSCHEDULE TRACT C ,Symbol & entific Name _ Common Name Size Quantity O Th,lja plicata Western red ccw 3'-4' 6 ® Pseudotsuga menziiuii Douglas fir 3'4' 16 ® Aar circinatum Vine maple T-4' 15 f M Vaccinium spp. Huckleberry S gal 12 Hydroseed Mix Festuca pratensis Meadow fescue 675E Agrostis albs Bentgrass 16% Alopecul us pratensis Meadow foxtail 161. 78 4' A-, 1qL ' Wetland - ' r Limits ', 1 „II1 mom\ `�\ `taviaia- �• �\r—„R�r'•-'� Cat _,.,, /�' P PW1O)rl fR%16N� / /' �,.. ��w 6 '1 // PLANTSCHEDULE r ' �• \ \ �9j�\ '� \ / ,y:.,- g,,.';r// l3 (�f• >�er U� ei/o i/ioa / / �/ I .�, \ . \ '...}� ,.- 1 j/ _. 'C 1MAC'1' it J�y.' S. \® �•r ' <9,Zia/ 1.,=Sr' — _ _ ./ '^ LTLn -��n'+�9!'�t' ® ' 41 �\®♦\ \ t+a' chiF' / ,®® R?17 ZO\` t � �. _ �- - - N `Y�( © YkNAAr i3r ® CO -®® q�N�\ Svmb/ l Scientific Name Common Name Size Ouantity l�ni-\c co Pseuootsu a menzles❑ a Douglas fir 3 4 ;5 n ` , ; 'V © t0 % ' oiFY ICI rr(Z I .) I J L g g _ 2.0 �; ® ® © ©©0 1 J SNnLf�rl/ 4 i. iit . rNf� 77 \ ® © South 330th Place N.; -N,� k,-rrlel_�j ( 3cr L Acercircinatu;n Vine maple 3'-4' 15 J Va - nium s PP• Huckleberry ;w i zs 12 J Ros spp. Wild rose br O 27 1 i✓ rs � ., f,,/ o �� rrs� W' U0 r U) ?:CO EZ UJ 1 120 � LL Z T---- 2 T-2521 ; LOCO LO CO P LLF CO I :-E i Sca�e: i =z0 --- / 8 �13- VNN 4519 lr M_ NGPE TRACT C , TRAC4 C Se.�cep e(.*e.m2n+ w�as �2. �lovti -• N, �i-1AN6GS : 87 pat �• �.?% / � � \ \ 0 / d \ f / Noic, U✓erexrofe wl CoPnci/e� Soi) 1 \\ �`---!'� ° CD ------------- ' f t J / o1 ' I Gop so l ♦ \` ® /�'/ WETLAND LIMITS J ' - 92 95 / , 96 e -'- h u� � �_ 97 j.-9 renre \ ----------- �� n'c;��- NGPE TRACT E PLANT SCHEDULE TRACT C Symbol Sc entiffc Name Common Name Size Quanti� OTh,lja plicata Western red 3'4' 6 cedar Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 3'4' 16 1y Acer circinatum Vine maple 31-4' 15 Vaccinium spp. Huckleberry 5 gal 12 Hydrosced Mix Festuca pratensis Meadow fescue 67% Agrostis alba Bentgrass 16% Alopecu, us pratensis Meadow £oxtail 16' . c.z-klue_t3c�c�lcls ct,," -t — Sa tA. l 5 a 1 �2 2e.d— >7Jec�(� 6✓a t �a ( — g 0&,k, G re e-n — `3v roe.+ n t �J �\ 1 V 5 hI h L I��CS✓1 CS'fQQIlY �' �c7 V1.0��" J Z�A, L& 17 \ ytgQ � a 1 � g 44 Sca�e a 1 ' /l //^♦\ ♦♦ `\\ / - i /- �-!__._"�--__� ; 1.na Tali Lip e� Wetland Limits PLANT SO TRACT E ' Z / \ %�Cm �V f Pr i�PJ! a LO,�1 D �n - - - - - — \ / �,�1 • \�f�1 (D �© v,. - — ` Oplace Or YO r I\ South 330th (ago.( T,,s ,i1 4' d �ti �'P�/e 77 ` r4-i ,/, 0 O r 1 J fir 6 V T � "M 0 0 N v � p LU d c U d' M CO u�w o O c Y on w 0 c v o - c C w i2 r M LW V �.I N N Z J I F. W' Z -0 LLJ cro c o w U U U °' fn Z Q U Z WLUiL U N T— CL Z LL W i 31W b"16s PY Wvl1v Salo - IgC/1l - lG pinK-SWDA gw( /-D 'D• 311�, - C3�c�l ��,F ��I � -?��l "� � ietiffc Name Common Name Size Ouantity P rl sedotsuga menziesii i Douglas fir 3'4 IS S ld3_C�`�NIOl1f19 10 ;� m cecircinatum Vine maple 3'-4' AtlM�d GB;1 dO hl 1 a mum spp- Hucklcbcrry 3 gal troo�� OVA r osspp. Wild rose br ®-5 t\10 8 sHT. 00 LO LO O I0 V")r's l Avg lj,/ O �P✓S� _.. _-. �L� \V Z Q W /M 1 V 'O V W I LLJ Z F-go Z ��z o QLL= W �F-� .— 0 O � LIJ in Z r�U F- U C:) U LLJ G Z L� w LIM _ Ocr Z LEI T f� C) F— LL- V)_0 F— Z 00 U Z F— LL) r F— 0a F— Q w �= VJ ry Q W \ Div A� P QJ Co CD rg ® P W P P P P P P P 10 � 1 w to, a OJP Z d Cam' P I P O O r 00 O) N DO N N U-�-\\ I 000 � w U f- � U. 7-3 V r) 1* 00 lL , ' �•lf /J,1 /Do / 1I e• c / may,• 11\\\ /`•.� o p � \ C �) �I �® O l 00 N &r;gg, I� 'Y w S U o N 3 N O J Z wok NN _4'Z lllt— M „as",ao.lo s� swn$.: c�1). 0 w o z vir: �< Wow t- c) mdz �°°�� Zoe ~�� o �O w w UOLL Z t co mZO�Z rM `N . b0 � < U. p rn 333 ZOD ern cV 00 °° OwcOMw OD Z I i V N O PI) ") = O :m to � 0 =) M Z �itNQ WW N$ �c~iZ 3OROOZ� WMhIO J'OI Ztn mom. N c Z V) Z is 9£•9£9Z 3 8£,d0.10 N z Z J J � D U -L l N01103S 3NIl 1S3M :0� v V (cONINN39 30 SISV8) n\(r,-)1� Y oOo ®P fl3 W o i 0000 • N �JIR � 9 V) X w 0 Z w Tw rin v / m N Z O C) w Z n O V) Z Z O w ME o it r u N Q w O Z J m w J Z Q Z U w0_~ =§g� In a =� - N ( 00 LLLLJ wwww f2NN(n (/) LO o Z N N Lli >< N 0 1 N — v ti o C )OD x w W C � 07 L.L d rr. W p N w 3 vJ r W Od C ,, > « � � Y y C = '- W 7 }0 N '� t — `c > z co cis U_cN T aDU z r- , = O r•• N N o S= •� N Q`�o >,o �! o L O y 0 wD -yam „ o� F'E oo O N O ~ O. D U � C �O C O " O � ; O � •N _N W N L y T p �oz to N G �t N N L q O O N O r O Z a �/�✓ wT �� V / CC ^ U > ll N C U y 3 Q >. G w L r0 ,!1 Z O C 2 1 L JMV C J t U v Z --� N A co O 00 /Y r Ca 0 N O N a QV g Q co C C s Z = N G Im cG CD rt9- 3 m D � ro V] o r r"u 'T CC �(D ry n 0 0 a\ v) .. ru + U N i 0 ro rU ti ti L4 \ CA -..I(3) E la3Hs 3as / N \ \ 0 S v\ X G` 0 0 W \ A CC) ?�O. \ s, mm \ "v 0 N D SA ltt0 �\ au cn m U R 0 , d ^ O � / O � O � 00 � /(A L4 Vn 0 i ec.9098 N SEE SHEET 6 00 cn N � 68'�91= 7 Co .6C,zb xo�_�8£'av CAMPUS GREEN Q Go m m GLm,' 25 r m c v. sx fry 2 oZ a v mm ; m0 w� nm 0 m rn X r N c: 0 �m 3N m ; v, Cb / 338 r�9^�� o 0 0 0 0 0 0100 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 C U O, 0 V V V V V N pop popp ww "Do t0 UO S S S S O O p O S O O oWCpOO(O O O S O U O Z NN-9 A (TOU .L4 V W -OA00N U W NNNNA U 00001-0 O O O V O (T t o ONO W 1 O O V U Q„ 01 0 U 0 C 2_ NNN+00A01 fNJi V A-+NOA W �O ? O V-+NJ V AU02 4 VO V C., 10 0100m -. 0)F; N N A WA NjR RN ON OCN oU4,�-+ N R -4 v A(AL"o(3L 0000) (.1 00 tO—co (O -4K3 -4NO) o1+0: m �N0W� A—:ArD W Aa Oi i w U ?mi 04 M to V) U tD a 0 r� 115 .0 (D � D 0 0 � Q 0 0 I O c, O J m NP na) N 1Z O 13: Co � //�� VI �� c � 2c o rn �•'F m s z ` � m (DO x � (D —� =� 00 a m� Wco � ,^ m O o n� Z W CD m ,o (D M ry n 1 (� W �i QOi Q A Z ru ti M �0' t_ O m z 0 00 !4 85, N 3701'16" W m m N 120.00' mc0 z -M --I X rATI 0D 000 00 m m `� A O �nM V O -=�zo O N S 3701'16' E 120.00' co A 0 o 0 n ao /11 o O \JI N 3701'15' W li 120.00' Na Z to o O U ` O D A CD 01 v C� S 37'01'16" E -p- v 120.00' � S N O O O O mo Ao N 3701'16" W 120.00' 0 N W P V U1 W U N _Q N 3701'16" W 120.00' rn U w rn A O O O rn N 'o. y S 3T01'16" E 38.00. 78.00' —� ly O O /y � z OD N ; J / to Lr w m y A i0 o Ie` CD O Co 00 N y00 `00' O N 3701'16" W # L=11152' T 4 v 1 648 N� 91p".�p4 = 22o 15. G =9g.17. �y � l4'59 � ?1'2141" Ai ls• I 0 24' 24' w W "q C00 F F 12583\ O g o ov f VV , f n � Q�O/'T� N v VVI . y Ot vrrivia" c c^ � Sp00, c a = z o Ln N O / U W C� A 24 ' j m CD N m --I co 0 O N O V D �mO i.t L-3 120.98' O t0 w � W g Q W UI 4 S 3701'16" E 100.70' A V N U I A 21 I + r W o vzi less t0 L �96'OtZ Z0 Nml/y�/ '•0 a c Ln W A CA '\Y D• • T� V f0 y a �5 m S 3T01'16' E M ED mm�m� o �2Dm?A ? ?S 0_ v 9,11:, O rmTl eseC m z o L A Q o O D S 18-49,1$3�3r� 33.. I ^ I C i 18 % 28.00, I � •32• I I -A 29, 29, I I U c MOD N O S 32'21'01" E w oJ.ZiS' /Vp% v CJ U. S N V N V^`t •(%�I W (O!) N A O c , oo �� ^' o� 40k- A "A � V�l 49 0�\ N u \ (c) W Zm v =Z mz �m ch �m O v^"( Z �0 ` v� r� W .Pe. Ul 00 $ m 0 m • QQ rrrl Om M p r G7 m n Dz �x f Z zczi m;uo mm mo rO O O K AZ > N ym��77D NC a04 ZZy� Z7� m m M �� Vz = O Z (pn F j cn0 O ?czi D mbN m M ; o �� r� z z Am rm �o g y o tnm �m 0 0 z r I r I r I r I r I co r I V r I 0)UTA r I r r I W r I Nam r I r Z Z O Z y Z Z y Z Z Z N O UU W UCn; .....A W 000'X `Ln0J0 golclR�la2�40 W co co V W V 'J W WON O O O O 00A A -=.1 p U A 'Ps t1j W ti01 O-+UNZ Aic t0:- .At0OD ON c�0c�nc�c�c�cDc�Oc� I OJ I t0 I 00 I V I rn I U I P I W I N I -+ C A AI 0000OO LNn (NIi rnN O 000800000 O O O 0 C) O O o O (A N O0��O0A-•t0 N w (A 0) (A W W A A r rri 0 A 0000 N o0D V N W _ 00-�t0 t0 V Oo U-+00 wZ N IJ t000o U L4W K) 00 -P, z 00 W 0m O-I N N A A A V V O O O L1L- °N4"NR9- o- 0AUW U NAOO NC.I N OC.t OO- m Ow IR 8 C� C m m D W m m 'O O 0 Z "A Z � M —I Z 'Z V T� ) L C� m O r�D =Z D_ 0 xzm cC Z Cm0O C) -A ZWM ALn - T � r- '1 =�rn mmm> z C C:) Z = O me m C m C �m 0 Ln D � O 39vd/3wmDA 0 0 m W m f0 0 0 ..1 z r0 D 0 0 OD I N C m Do V U Oo D D n v U 0 I�1 Q 0 Z m m r 0 �Q N � O V / C =' m m K m to t 3 of O Z Z m IN r m Wo N 85' v v , W N 3701'16" W 120.00' J N 0�� o o O O U N A 1 O O N 3701'16" W 120.00' O N N ( n v ' D 0 o N 71 0 V TppS,�'4s9,S. 'W f q�cCT / ek \i S.'2g.4S. S�4Sg•'N� se ',0q� p 0 s F?9 � o m o r n 4 5 O O O (WT N N 3701'16" W >D 120.00' J N V O O 00 A U N O N 3701'16" W 120.00' V N o � ] O p O N coO O N cp l T ] N 331701'16" W 120.00' N f0 N U -PalN 00 v T QI -1 N N 3701'16" W 120.00' 1 24' 1 w j CD r n m 24' N�0 0m V 0>0? W N � Vl lnUZ tn� N U U 2 N2 NUZ UO U -• 0. O� J V U -,,A W W -,J -4 W U Ui A N N O O? O U O O 02 N CO W UN� N A W (.gy t0 C% 0ONN L4 0 Z Wi p" pq" llp p; p; Wi 'P. (p. mmmmmfmm mmmmf 0 -+ CA A W NNN W ? D (OOA O D N 0-J A-? M0 O j�n J O( O � f U W U FrUNZ W O J m 1 Z Rts N Li m 00 0 q z OO z -1 -� z 0 o U) _ 0 = T TI -� mt%j� �0-P V �TV Y ` T /K /;z 1 ' 1 z m z G7 m 0 Z N �0� V / = =m> 0 0 � Z �m 0 M C Z _ r m z o o o o0 m m Ln o m L m • f Tl m r /� M r > F mjy m m �y �o �� o z � 04 A m o -< zc fr'I cn:� 'P II V) y1 m0 00 mf*��17 A ; A m m q (n C +� UI A 7C m D 0 0 O ' Z= ODUD C �O�77 D rn ryr7 N O 1 Z Z m VI Z m ZD m K D M o �I7A r� G� m m 4 m Z >DOC n� D N c Z V ; m c 9 Fi m m rn m CD CD O 1 0 0 m En CD 0 0 O IMP r t 1§ Z = r 0 m . Q�p >Q Ica � ,,^^ V/ c C _ Z -N o ti C m �< m — 0 co CD �mm a� cn 'D W O C o NDs N `A -t+ -0 CD OD W �y v � O\ T n C "1 lfl Y N J N � N Ln Z o .fi N fU m M� W O W N 0 0 g rot'16" w 48.33' Z W i m mco m" yAi Ozm �6+ m s \ o. S.S29.33'01"E J0 35, z v m -� V II � (A co V' a O Ln S� F� wss. � to N \36�� 3S f 00 c \ S 3701'16" E 118.00, 90.29' 27.71'f to V Cj 1J N tlJ ��0 N 37'01'16" W 123,71' N !! nn to v' (AM N 3701'16" W 1V 20.00' 8 N 71 N 37'01'16" W 120.00' V g W , 0 V 0 0) N 3701'19* W 120.00' V 0 O A cn p N / �'1 � �J� N 3701'16" W 120.00' V S D � S 37'01'16" E 120.00' V N o 0 ON L _I v- N 37'01'16" W 120.00' Ln N g 24' A W N W V, pO b, YOB �D ON O V n: N S 37001'16" E'l� R=268.67' 50.29' raA TH 00 0 � g N O V1 � M 0 $ m m m 0 y m o r ITI Z7 RNR11 —0-2 00 D f'lCC0 O; m m8 v �Z C N N mm o + v� o o vo mPoo -' z� A ,8 ;EA m �p 6 m R zTqz oz IN V ti rn A C o� W T V' 3E y�c Qa i JONO OD- mUA CAN �C mzwzvzznzznz rW.. p rA �OD rNW� V 010 N N- rWOf rm mccDcccIcI(lc0 Z r0C z z —DI �Nr yO-r� �OIr c°2yM WN Ncm{� NO NO NtVD 0)mEWr W W :Wdo Npr nrVWj ai 2 mW Ln Ll A pNS pN0 0 0pC pS Nf *mfmmO mf m �2/44- 1 24, C 2 CO wC O 50 3: W A �N �f C2 N rLl `> / ? m 24' 24' e 0 _ N WZ O T :1 fTl D r mmN 5, Z � ILI m 46m v?u v� w O 4� 0v z zz.aa'M�4zbb S34'37'4 E , r "Oil ODw �C .0 $ I�. V O n z Z-n __a Y m Z �z� V / m 2 mm O D -I o�� 0 r�> �TJ � Y Z � Z I'Tl (ZZ m0 l J Z(nm YT0 r '1 (n_m =ITIZ Z Km O m� m _gym D Z '--► `P O 24' 124' �« tenet 1 4 0 C m 115' O D 0 Q F= Nnl O �u G t� tJ V m 4pow N woo CD � C :r 2 z 1j � o ` m r s< co CO h 10 EMm co - co o Wo C N w0j m � � m r^ M M n v n 1 W 00 j o Q Q to Y ^y N + N N .. t0 z C) ru ry m L D L07 Q KOOp N 37*01'16" W 516.50' 130.00' 251.78' u 0 o N 3701'16' W 0 o vO " o co 0o v`�i • O m mm m g m m m G) v m _ Z mA a.)mz 'i r y '^� =v oz 6 -z-i cG0 �=v �O m zOC mm O o > mp W� ccy�� N U2 wC - CO DN - = p0 D 8 A m � Dz fm O NO mN m 0 mHIV 0� �O mD m m rn AO N� �y7 m .J.�� z z Am OC ry0y �< m ➢ <p O Nm Ln m v z z z v O 0 (i Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 C I I to OD I J I I I I I I c .Z�J 01 U A W M m D O U O D U U N N A p oo^000(TI Ln Oc fTl to �I•+1-4100 OD V 0 Go W z 0 oincnoi.o� O t O 0 D A N O N N O O O W W W A 00 OD A 3E 103.89' N z J IV N G7 D 0 O cc a � NT N • A N • O w� rn C s pss� es, °S• S 22'32'43+ \48.18, ES T1 35.00' ? N y � N cn � A A W AIJ, o m V it T N o00 AV al II N tW 0 W. L-8 W \ O, jQ �T 0.* L-276 rn 71 m y ° "o /y S 9g \SF Do WA N `'y f � 9S) U 0. lJV n N 3S26'47" W y -n o, 96.98' Dr 1 T U O] 10f1tP Q+ W 0 �L4 N ��,� m0 . 1 N 35.26'47" W L j z U m rn 117.33' (4 II N W ` 1 N of wp s m U O I N 24 32'07' T N t„ 105.Op to 0 A 0) 11 10 v N O? W N �:q 0o. F N �— 2432107" W 12� 102 03, SOE N 0) A II '1� U W O CJ N ` ^ o� \ 0) m c cn m� Zrn� A' ' Y —i' m O • 2r N � A _ rrI z , s 2 • `� =j = O -4 �v 1 PL-5 L- 6— �} L-14 t/ � i I N" �U m I II (n V U V c'� V W m D CJ l T W W i1/► Z •-1 Ln N C o°o- ODN 3043'03" yy m U 110.49' m N-�j co IW j A 24' 24' " m c cn mT m;o vArn �]�.Z1 N:pq r'Om z _ �0 .I o 2 V O C)Z 00 'gas, z H 0g?,:? _ M �8 "rR� m O z z0 •-0�••� /V o _ co z O O z TIN —I m�� Z . r0D z D ? 0 Xzm C: o� �m0 M d A o f�_ z " ' m � Cn �0 r =�rn = m z 0�_ Q� zm VJ m0 rno 0 T RID mm Z —.• T O 39tld/3wn1OA A a 0 0 m W V) m O O m Z rO D r0 O I 0 m I N C m 00 I r 4 � 0 O) rGo. ->,'r mrf;W oj:woW Mato N ON OZM =N o.1)'=N woN 00m" *MoN 00 >*o" N � f0� 0^• DGoy m 02---I -IV-• � m(nDD� A DOO Nt0 Do �I ZO.Z7m O)Dm Cn 1m? .Z7�r W m Li (0 mao A� .'O Cm-;u m o 0 co v rn v z� z �p 0' 10m• Ste• 1n mv)* Z =Z. 0- tn -0En,Zai�mOx O< h =FAO m�O Ti C: __4 -Imttnn V) D� Dy oxZ =m. pm. O. �mW OxN OMDmO 00 0. 0o -MADS rnmVr-I�m Mc0= _= oD mo 08 m_Oo± 1-�-r m =1D �0 UC -4) r� Z--IA o Ko r Zf+l 1 =mom $ A Z I cam >m -ix<r mmm CN F rZ"1 z Zm= cxm < 0 mu'x r- fx Z o 0 0 0 =ter �r o� o� x� momom �� x rn m �m p z _ Nozo �z- cn mom m�ppFp Z. m vr� xmo< - - m<� � <� �m Arm mb� ��mzo� rx' �n o m �m< �<��rrnn �rw++ m- Zo OM-1 m -0x0�'9 mmA �O�D OZ6; Oo� 0ODM 10 W N J 02w Z-Zirn �m 7��0 M� �rnN<ZMo O Mo 0 w o azm m W' oOmZ) V En ZOfn -__4 ZN �<I')Zfr�*1 ONcz� v)�r�* 0��z c-'n0Zz C z A noun (Aoeo ut zx o�� ? c� ov-S c� cn max=+=� yy �m7 yy �rf*m"7 ZOO o wrn o V) V) �a OrnpON <�;m< xm /-.Z7D c ;D NmmC N (n N N N�� r� D- .gym F Z7D .: < 3.Zn7Zr QpZiO'r�ZT >m� .'O� :L1Z ZmOD Vl cof'-0-C_7Z Q`�r -mo; Z cn;)CA p�--1 O W OD Ofn yI-' �2V) Zm 'O rW ;(�/ImoO <(mjZ nmm n"< Co om0mcn Zym1N m O ct� 7z 0;Z N CS Om C C C C �1� z=x Z<D nVj�O O N2 m ON m rn c x �A z m� z OW D tfon >�= C�Z Om m' '�Z� O 0 Woc M>Z m0-10 Zzo� O fAn�ZO m�0 r3 U p �t�o Vl mo zOVIZ tmi7� Np yT �N -0=mc ~mo 0 �Z2 Om �� =NZCZ D �� OfAr1W O 'O Off _N pN N0Om M tM m m Dom 7�0� m ��X O--I�NAt�+lx O yy0 Or V? Z mD� ZZ ZDrn mN V)� rn2-<L �cm 0 C FZoz AZIZ')0 ';N =mrz 1 -0-1 y M. 2 x WZ . •nm � 0 _% Co N V)CO 7c <r V)O Oc AN p mx 0mO�00 Z0 =omm c�z m o Vl P � � �O �SZ m �of .Z1 A(� elm Nm _7 co {.• x 7T1 r' o f� O O m m 0 0 0 m r -i rD+� y -0.I "r =I -1 --I m m z Fn o D -i O 0_ Z po �7C__q is -iyO0 �Or Zm 0t 'LO Z_11m mmO 'r AO.ZI D�N� Z�r� p�� O o O O �N Oo N (d 'R GAO 1+12 bm2 C) 0> 00 rLo �DJ7 xA o�0 Oo om <�1.y10 �Ni �j (n0 C" N 0 00x Zom"Z •yDrj F D D D D am- �• v4 NOS �Z 0;0�O--I��c� Af SZ �Z �J •"SOIO �m7 (N D 'N mm 7Cv� �-i mLn �'�I'�0� <Zl2Z I�*1= �� Opl�*1 f*lC OZ� x M A ��C C � m�; NO S�p(040_ 'n0 ZO `nv ZODS ; rZ� fm' �O OF0 pO Z SjO 7oc OCZ,)rn �� moZ �[1 -1 20-1 Z Z z ON mm m > v m-D m ffnr m ZDS m i�; pp ` x�c �b -7 mm -9% mm �I o�Z �'O -�� ot2 0> Cm fZnmZm oNN�Z Z" A? Ornim 0 --1N m �.�m D D D D 5z + 0� O+C omZr=lD 00 om OA r�mn� oro� m �o m� z� v-4 Fmv N-m*m o3 x Z -4ort/) vv >cn r-i* r-i* F �znl 0025 > tv�"l� E r�vzv me mn <m �m�vr OA"'�Z ma Om Z-1 rO Z. � Ot/7m �0 Ovl j orz xz^0 p� Z 0� 0 o v v ON Vf UC + �nK Fn 00 w _? �lF> r c a c m Z Zr O 0 o �fD�7 FI O NC 0 t� A �7 o0- 0> < mo to r*7 z W ;yyNo Om fnO Z0• 1 fnF O vlf c�i f�i £ � £Z > yy �l�-0r Oto wC Om O= .b t�' .M m Z r;D ODo -1 DO m2 >...r 0Z NmmZ 'D r22D Zm Z 7� OA t'7 CWT =I Zm OmmN <o Z� Ox <Z0m 2 z0Z prpom ZCom c rn0 o AfCO*10i- Ga') �D,) Z 0 O r'r moN�D� pZ Cm p W O < Ca�� m� C pm x x0 m 0 O o� m OZxO a) 1 0; m m 0 m x't OZm Ov�n Z �-� D m� nO z v m z i oo rn m� foC f W �Z T-. _��,� =V7 mZ O� rm t�' CC �.� Dmm 1 m m Ri .S O m °oD mzz C � o �bo< 0�0 m Z Mm* Z- r 0mzm ISj o)� � � �� mt"n Z^� rnb� � p --1 0 wSN� m'� �) Zx �1 m0-15� 00o V)-i (nZ 0 1 --/ �y �..�Vf tAn _o Cm gx m0 ZDx 2 =�0 Wm C On N= ON �r--V7= ZN O� �� = O• VN 06' m Vl �Q >f��*11 V)tA NC > i - Om tn( Z moo l�r'� m� COm Z w. D Orn� o ��M <<�> Z ZmDM m m i �fn mz ego rn .< o�m� mZ p mZ r yy C �O m 0;0 (A c-/ N"'cj Z--I x-m TLmC Z�� 0<C) Zm m m Zm �0 x _n O NO� N Om OIT<7 �O V) O Oo mD�D ZMW mm�\ O�Z m mg -1m -1 ? 1 --1 N Nm _ � �$$Z y2~m-Of0rt-0 cZ 00 cZ N ONy �ODz PI)yN o; AZ =ZU) 0-rCZm mPA tnON offvT*11p N =-=x �1 m m m 0 z oS i/1z t�O' m7Nm CO * % �0 trn i r-I�7 V)xZ m�ZO Xz OD Nm �OWO =O<m -ym OZzNO �oA moo6 A X. .ZO) � �QyG * �/ v�pZ �I�i CO2E X m0 .Zmm fn0 V Omm5 m0< �r Az W� =��" ZOI') = O .ZIx �Z1 .Z)Z- 2 2 2 2 `"O a N� �>y N0 �O>MO NO 2_m �O w omr -i xrn co O WC Fm r fn �0 0 7cmm 1� Ovmz m m A m yF p �A Z- or-opr A D �F)Dy xoDO �V) r00 rn0 r0rm 1�OZ mom om xt') Z �O� ZI*7 t� w Ztn v smmc� ZZ �m ZZ r A0XC mZ.ZI- AO NZ mVj f=mO Z O 2 Z m m m m v0 -.0 0 x =mZ V)-IC m> m O' < mo OOo W U mm Om--1 -10 �D ? xmm �x Z Z Z Z -i ZM rn 0m mm=jw--4z ox Z� om A T.V) -0rr OZ m m MZ N y < Of�7 rr*7 f�r1 .�W 2 OO D Coo V) 0x �DD -<-Im I �o.Zl D 0�C m m m mp pp O Z� �N 2' f��771 m 00 m W �-im< <-IxA O"I m� ZO N- Of �f�m Zr� Z" ;u2 0Zm z _O y ti 1 1 oz 2 Om -i FmZyO� -N-1-1 'D O• §� rn ZmC7� =7m�� N.Z) VIZ OO O TI< Nxrm pNZ rfx+lm= .Z)-` O p�< O O O O ;C �C �..' < G7W m6vcm�=m D �0 D. Noma zM m me -O cny oA� oz�� \ 20 N mo �Z z o m < (A�m=;m0 0m< vD c7w (n --< �x fS•1 0) �-Dmo m-+ N m 0 g8mm Cl)o owo r r r r �N �N v N0 2�Ny m mr Oo .ter oFD. o- n ;m rA0 N=. c � m 0 r �-I_ O o o o c (� o mo y mo r ZO-� � m� mV ZZ) x O '� Om�D m �V)a ZOy z z -I < -1 NN D mN �Z VIZ O f� mr, V Om wC m-uum � rOZ �)x� :U 0?1 M mV)� 2 y O z2� S cZ 0_ m0 �= rn�<o mO.f0p0 m O',� 0 m y A O w co W 00 0 W op NV+ ZZZ 0 (nV O mN yN Z Z m N Z N m Sr0 Oo Z z N-' V -tOmr mo D D0 C ...bbbbb �n z N i+ Orri --I I') D 0 DD y m S -r = x A V)N�m 2WO Dr- °im Z ��m OV)ZZ O mxv \m0 o rn�~ Z rrMI m m = 00 �Z �;v -IZ ?rn �Z Zao� 2000 o m< 0 1 O N�m 0 F.GO C7 of 00- ;m 0 � v --1 Z7 Z O C Z O DMO U) ZQ 0=i 00 m�'� Z O rn � x O Z "x �� (� N 0 Mx m a c < NO m�4_v o pm o f rnZm ON v m rn m� m� jZ m Z m b Z x O rn W o o U c (n �.. m rno N �N -+ I N I I 5 1 o I m o0 �o zx cn F x r z z Z m r M �Q w N Q 1 o' V) CO C i ti � r••F M .c Co M VI m� y C05 DMz C cD m O -nr1 tirD5 M CD W o n w oa ..V/ i� R) r0 Cil Gto �/ L om N 4p M Z IL r7'1 o U39Vd/3wnioA N M rn V) m Mm 0 N =xr0n Nw z -M> rnm�c0 Oc D 0 Cm=A II II II mA 0 O =-Z--IN SZ W 0 R O O BOO ZN -D m) AO AF n p NPL 0 n C Z 0 M p0 m Z O n m o x X V) 0 r m Z -I m o r o c 0� �Z�wn �� Z (/);o coox� jo �frn1l -' coCmN2 NZ x0 0 �omwm O NC mZ D�a Wm ZrM _ Z L< z rnmmC/) ��m0 O � N r nV �rrm9� t`c�1��U1 DA Dr ZW (m*1 G3Ex1-N mo Wrrr��J O_S mc�0 mmOO ZD 02FD Z~ZoOD o.TD)N-1 oN GZ;0 -Io0Zn om mz`4F c'"'o?= < oZOm 0� Oo1 mNmc =�G)Z Z-gym-z ar0 m_ x m o v 1 2 m m x Z �O O 0 0� n Z Z a7 c mN o10 mm�z rZ fn0 5 NZO Ormnrmn��GZ: c "m mN �00 _=Oo pD 00 00 D o� �sz InX0 t-ii\ �Nvz -0m<crz-Mo 0mO �0 N �y7 ZZ On 1Om >mCAx OC fo:= D--I tmn>ON rA0 0-1 OZ9O <ODA �� Z$:_ CCrrOO to .Z70 mC in �O ;0 O0Zm - ZA ODzm f+10 m0)0 Am0 p0 Omo mpmrl Zm ...I?Z; 0 ,>41 090 i 0 m y O Z N O N m; of� a m O r o g zD � r� cZ�A Nvci� �o =`�f mz9 om�mm��0 U Azz-n CZ1F-105; ' -i>jo ro0 o Z co zm ZOIm f�1xmNO.Z< CZ� WO m O C OZ f*1m 0m 0 ZO Do ;D .-.O VV)�m O --10 XN mz-q nm�C �m N V) DC 9 y Zo tn� oZ „N, A*WC tn- y W Zm --11 W mW ZZ mm0 m<000 0>0 Zf H =yN=oOD AWN m� ;CZ IS� +10�7 KO N'��Sfm-�mZW o�O£C �ZO 0oDmP%m pm OZ mrnro2�0 2�ZZn ZOOD> o m.VN NN O�nOomjmzwoz CM 20Z�m O��D �'Z � ME Z D O o p GO O m Z C N D D m O o m D Z�n M om x"m<? -OC 0 om�c ?,Jr�* omo ;u co ;O p rz Z Zr Z rN W _< 0Z 0mCO DFq0 M ,-. Foo OZfn-orr..�� OZM, 1 Z W m O Z CO Z O 0 Z _Z D m o m 6 mN o� m o K o-i �O"mo az 0 � D=m �Z Fi� O-1 D Z o = m A C 3 N Om D< m O z z m I C u! m.10 rp co x�Dpm2 Z=y�0XCA=Z=m�m=�-n M>-.izm-+-100=O-I00 -im-i0 nZ VC�C-Z 1 gm ri0 zmoAcnmrn m wcnm. im m m xaw M mmmo n2mo�xxmx z f !IZVzo4OO)0= nr+'Z n C:-I• Z:A Z>Zo20ZArmZO�yZ ZrnZO[qZ-.Z cmm rnm vlKoomv xw> D mOrm 'rmA V7 OO�oZo.-�0WOZO ��O oV)o- O' ZZ z� mmmm�mx-i -r "i Z qO om Z m rnom0ZOmo� m�NomOmOmZ� OZ�Oo 0m OmwxmxZ= o Zt�.. om-<N p V mN�7cn +FiN mom O C- m Om... I'r0 mm mZ FA� F 0f0� m0 O O oom m v 001i p z < r.� o = W O O O O O W OZ V) 00 V). N woo N on O A x mC p A'��zm N Zc -'�i >"-�c'-1' cvc-?-c<o0 Z muoo-'o oox0NOOxoo oz �roAZoZo D� N -1 -10 Z Z�• rn>Z 0-IZ OC CmC?COOCC CO tn�JO 00 �- �NQ_q�� ot�0D0 _`m= m�ONOW<WOO�OD r+l 7c fOCOOOrrD..��xrZTlx mzxm=z�x= => "Zomo �AAZ i0 -'Op OpWrC r� OT 'ImNZ�2 Z 4�i c4agooMC4X Om omomym�OQN�(nyof-pQ� �_ p�p ZC Z_ mm rONZ .� -$'Fn W A p Oo O Am m.1 o Dm OmmoVm0VxN-iOt`�A(J� Om O��N Fym �zp� N<ZmV)-'ZW O NO fPG Z_. ZN�WL fom�OND tG �l N ?I Z�NA=m �7 y t•i O O 0 U1 f0 " C V -( W Z W N (.I Z I'1 Z p NN Cam' ,Zr x AOC�' <•{O .,mw�Ozgz-1mt0 D^mi0°4"-tni°ia°4=C�^i aqo m- mx m ~ �ppOJpppO Vm N�=�mm� m[pnmOm x4AOmZMO D 0m f2 NOOC-O�O� NDA p , V)Ai (��/7 Z) Z�(�1r�--m�O(r(F�. 2mo F�1 .Tl XO-A Om y"4c� ��f�Oy OxAC. m 00D �4PZM4 I4�? -.4 Vlm pZNZZN=rD= t+1��CIoO z _4L0JmC 0p 001m O Vy~)�Z0 I00� OrC*lo t'��=F- DD.Z1aZD ODD �� ZOO om O�n�� JZ= i$� WxZ-0 OO� m 0. O�GZ7 c'V Z�C Oz-IO mz fz mOrz'5 F 0Ov zo ZZc�c�zjp mj p{ LIVO i 7 >_nzoz mcma�mcm��0-zlzr=co= OZ 1N omo zaa "m <mm7C"'Im�Zao r 17i CC�� rr�'9+ �p*c) m r *woos xm mrnm om cmiczio =� oOp�Z�= yr 0 �Z m m f ONV)�Mw) l Wz V) bO omm m0 Cmwmwz�Am ��m GGGGm111/�gmSzrz pinp �x�ozzml0 0o ._,s� t10--ICCMMt4 o0O ma to000Z00o=ZZC0C O z 7C��A �m�2N0Z0 Comcb=-qLrnmZc0 fxr7mox r00=-<r cww" cnmaZ jrn2o!- �Cm .T2 < Qr V rn� Z G0Cow ZOD C 2 m O COC fom <x m0Z 0 0 4Rg� 1= x fr-Mmzzo-n Zwt4r>z fZn *MMZ Z. O mrn Om COmrOD�DF pp �n C t1 cx om V1 m•• N r-m 0--ro m mom m 0rr '�-rt ICAO yp �in2 :1 mil 0- p-xn coo :qA 0 <0 mN 0 V--'ON 1cn Z rryy77 ApNCONrn z g 4* � -n to Co.A<• vo�OQ O• 4 i5m M�7 rm•) O� C� 0DM-` -I ZN y'<# S-1pp = .Z)tn m mz�m �VZ 0M-iC i1 .Z72 G�0 A7T1f l* mz Z �O Z �1 yy11 omNOorn o 00 AZ2 m- ((//�� rn < OOQoc 0 V V ey L fm0 ~ 00 xD m m�NVV11 o0 m> o�.. J �ANn mA-1D Z �i.'.r V z v fM+Z�r--Or A00M 08> mmmCpD com f0 A< Ov Wox- Cn<o" m Z Z A O GGGGGxx �DZ Z rmO -1a ��77 mOO �tv _0O CY0> Oo 00 A=Zym O ;Z 00 �(tyZ��0 �jxg<VlmSM yN=0C 6mnnD omx_r� SNZm<Z Z= fr�+1-aIOZZ�m�pZ o9OZ A f=T-1i > V)O m0 Omm o OPC 6A D• D �AowDCo Om mm-.Z) O m oo1 .Trn/ 0rN O OOm DZ�V'� C"IW NZOg� >m0<7ZT'IO ZZ O �OznO-0=v 2++Z 0- x Arn fD_ � OZ �� m ZOO o0mOD LKSCpo Co Z mc<ODZrnm< 7C <� OVoa Z Ow < mZO v -0<m2 ,�m)=TI m0�4 o OOOmmc m= J Nm�OOp.PND Z f/i -'O COIN r Z-0 -0 Z000= m� ;K �tm') DOZ N �� V) �[i+nt CC -I 0 ` n�i� mz�= m p � 00xM> mzo � r Z noZaoCN tom D °i 7.m ooFo D mC. Z muv0 0oo Z 0 MZCo=x W g Dz� D o < mcZ') NfZ'1N V) or0 =OD D pA o O�O 0N0 m -1 �t�/ ?0 OOArnF�� C .L OM = rnfn fDr •D_ �1" �oZ p�x+1O o2r 00<m4WX WO D OOC< F<z Z 0 �.Z-lom N ij)j�= C Nf Camp Zym ZMrn m .�'�Om-u O'er z -'O'r�00DA cn n vrno p�MD fog Z =fcziZ zn� �� oc� �x o 2 ut I �Z Pi xm0 0 rnzm C cO--11 �rr O) w-Dmr�y O 0Amr<*1= Z0 :4Om �O LA NV Nxm m �70 0M m.Z)� V)DQ tC <0-OI VVJJNX mo f;D-n J mm�OmO � 7 �N Dmm x� mc�ip O �z� � moo= 6oA `a ?o$� �o 1 m;0 ED �o D c _y m rn p _n Z 8 O :1 0 (n w oZ 05.il o m 0 Zml v m 0 O Z E.9 �J vm --i Z 000 Z M N = 2 O T r N 0 -P '— z D:17- � < _ Z rm Imo J m� 2 Z(nrm 0 jD/� Tn ." V IL 1 ' 1 0 * 0 0 Z rrm T�0 1 1 TC T� 2 1 ' 1 m 0 Z 9 V" - 0 0 M (A N mOZ;0 00 i 0 v �mr V) mo mo-I Fm� -O_I m=0 O Dm Z f mAo N v Z o M ;u 5 1D 0 I o m�1 >A MZ O �mx W m0N c0 m cros xm-i 0 CD m omr mm CD mom O Z< m=0 0- _V > N Z ,-{1)ZO 1D0 z-<o m _om Alm r Z U) O O 0o m10 ohm 0 K1m-I CmmA-immD m m�Cm-)Nrx*I OmDDWO➢m2 D M V) U) ZO-rZmm ITI mD AOCrm --I- �-4m-Aim ZAmmN mO��Frf<.l f f)l C m_Om 0r0� 2NZ N C: 1 mo=Z Nm'm_ k➢AN nom000Z O?mDZ>OM Nm� MC C-M mm-A1Wcm�tmm ;7 �O�>O OqCcj ZDm N 06) Ozmr N N,M_ ON MD>Mom Dz N m Z 000 �00Dm"_jy< < C�zZz fA m0 Dc')z ZI=N 50 � Z O O In 0 m Z m m N -n Z 0m� m vm)Ln ITIMZD mm1 2N Doom mO-=Or.1*);0;0 A D r m m- Z O 0 1 W - -0 2 m cmm� N1z1ZD z1N moWNO 00? mpovoi m00iMmco cm o 1 NTN m�ozaDzO fxrlZm Dx N ZmZr=D N NNr C y->MCr m-Z< m Z N �*)DAm m-i0zmv�ioc N F-Im mm0 jOD-W DIM W Z�MnoO1A mFNm D-im�Omb..c m frA'IND Oomv) -A0 ZDZ�n ZZmzrm*)o mmoZ 1�O��C�1 C)m m- O z x x mm�m 1-io m o�mD Sr2•)cm M Z CI N ;01 O rNOWN N xmc� O ➢ r U) r � O n � ZSGZjc Z M OZ- m (� :E CD m Nm mr->mrr- v0mmo M mmgnzm << N00 m 0 rnv W m Z m M �zairD ) m -I r _1 v) mmDZZZZi 4` =;CDz Zol"A O omC)>-0 Z mm<rz M�mm 05 ZOW >NDZO Cxzor o O r C*Om1 AZoMrn oz-H CD N=oov N-00 omZN( >�Omm � CD m nMAO Z mZ�(n Zr Z Z O I 0 m -4 ;0 V) Z r oM m Z) c 0 r mo ZZ O Z 00 mZ yO m c � N N 0 0 FA A 1 0 0 m M O I 0 N O rm/) G m ZD Z O Z m� O N �r�-2700W ��m;M0 S cZn F Z o D O� r O Z oLno KN-Ov]�FnmO � -<rr--),)Nz 1 32: �vmcnAnvz Z �Nmoc 1 ��W�G) 0 O x1-0' m c -1 xoz ooN1M mmzN=mZnN <�0 v)moFm m 0 N M 1-um 1 mCO � zvv)D')z�moz S EnF O N f? Z o 3-1 �0m�m oN VmON ccm=mC)y 1 OO4N0O ZNCN *WWfx10 oom A00: T?.zmZ czlo0mo 26N N M Z ;0 33 vDC--A>m v 0 Imo O m M x; r my 1o?zm1ZM Am- 00 A0�Fq<o�mm D >� A O o Z* o N N 0 0 rMM Occr m z 0 �Z� Oon O�ZZZZ m C) S j Z N 00-CD >�A 0N O=-2- Z0mZ0C<y D O N l N? m O r m D D N m m m O O>� z D O N m - A; M Km N ')rr (n M--lM Omm- , ZCmmnDnr FNZnNZr n-i f�m 02m x02R �,� 1� mmmomWDmONr•)D 01m� room p1�C j �DCD)A Zrm10mONrZ�m; fTl 0 CO Z m Z -< r D i z- D !- O r 0 i m ?o�SS grFi)� oO�Nov➢imor-=Xn�rmZm1�. �gCD Dm�m O ^ �"'N �..� (!) -0mox0cOmrznm1 m00N m m�z .o NCO 00 _. O cZm *r '-i�2 �O o zlmo�mmi=m ;0Z 2 q om n r0')ZZ ��m� ? 10,14 ,V-<Mmzxpm�1Z DONNCmDjO m � No mZN� X �� C)I?c �^ �c�mro-Dio�oz�� p �zc rAo� rn G9 omm_mmmmmmy< 1_m Z m nC) I zm vFyo O mbz�--A-CmmmzrOmym'Ir� ou mr<o �D m rm) ')NOZOm�� 1z AR AcoO oftN , gc:om .Z ow ^ T Mm CC)c!m O--I OCOWOOD0=1Zr r�i�o Z OO m NQ `/ W NZDO�O Z ohm 20O m m NDm rz_< -ZM O D�O?� m>= v)r mrx,) Zr'Drm.)NN 1NIn � �N(Z/) = (en rM-gKDOmOZDrxmOzrm*)OZ N� mm D /� a N 1Z2>mm--i�mmm0 mZ< C Ei OZ�F V/ .ZZ C w oom NXrm�0rmmOmCOm� OHO om ;M-0 = C o '•� C NDm>ooCMr)momm�mDIi000 Nx mc2z OD o N Z� X Z W mm[F M a: ow 0 1N X �2Dom CO CD 0<mIN'*)Z100OmmM O MMZ �O Nrm*)om :+ m mDrOnpnrM•)umicxnm>r�* mv�izCC ) ' DZ omen in zO Om 'tD (Q mmmm�r_mo mZzmvZONm ��*It mZ CZD NER �• <2��Nr�D2mOf m-4m Om0.5::00 -Oi 2-Z< m m--im--DO i ) m- mo0➢0mrA.)Dr�m• mxm0Z-0 N 0vz Z m1Z�1�mDZprlmMOz .N-10 00� rW*7(O mOODmZnm�m2mfN*]'CU�m K:. ;N=f*)OD L O O :G) m C D aimmDiN�ZmZ�C� G)N;0 M< s-i'�Ov 2'iMnm�vD-zioNlvcZi>--I>�r7 �Z Z� sod)G 7mlOD r,fm*lDZm v) F10Nm con-DI1D n m�>mm 10nz=moD�� z zWmm--11 AD mmm F '. :y 10'" omm mmmmo�rommn �.,.<m= �Nm I N4 OCf) mZOmmm I I X � �m Xm j O D 39tld/3wn A Z 09 ym U) CO r Z A XZ mD mZ 0 (A __ M 0 m �0m- m*O➢M O-0OFzZc-<p MMAEMOO �grrlmy Lf)xMDo O 1 N � r a) V) �oWn -Dir-Om CD�_Orm =O�mNZr.t�fA-- GZ7�Ozm-DjO �^ jrp}�r�.O mN m pO50 x 1mr0No --40> )o0�2x ��u cox=� Arm,)mmmo 5. 00Z-)>NZ 0 (f) M. ) >Wmm� a >vm�mOZryWry**IIW A 2- N Z 2 CO v�)NcmifMZF C C O� O C r m -im 1m00Z 01 oyo zc=jiz/ v z r ym fA'l v)ZN>yDr X C m Z m ZZZ mczo rC_<O Kxi zv0D mmox N'"mD< N ZNxV M mc--A zzzc)--I -Oro =D�Zm io/)Am-m2Z<)C-i0 N021WA1 m °rpz;Nzm00= m C m 0 m o O> m C)omOy�zDA-i o V)m:I)N�ZK ZCD1MrrI0o ;0 co m m O �0 zzoo 0 m ^R1�m�� of x r DOrMOr*lM mm<M zm2MO j*mom V)ZKD Mm�0 0 C D m(n 1'-m Om<z 1M40 O -4Dm mDrm mZZA N000 lmm (NM-<rm�) nMO—f*tn OD1D z0Cz m _n O m m ➢o A 0 0 m1 O -nZmq 1zo -nooz 0::Jlu0 m<_mA z rKm icmm -<�AC0) 0-4 MmKo K � rm*IZO m n0C 0 Z N ADM mC O m >190000 71 M z MI m �o00c*--Ai sx- =Nrr.)m0:2 C A.iS A�mx v2�� D OMA { � oz 00 xCD mm 100 ►0 --I x mmx m ODD vcNi x in m 1ZEn D D2�� O V) co 0]�T D n Y �MP >m ,UM -,Mc) 1 m o 0 1 comma 1 mmmx K➢6.�z M ZOm5 OC rM rMo C Z -i .i T ZD)ZN -< O -➢<o<o<q-< -nmZo mri*=-40: Nmn o mzx ar m I> M m mN10 m51 m O-+ C• ma<--- ;DWm M1400 Z Zm �Fo-Im--Wlim ZZO m-TI -1xr—, oor-D Z�mD -q=mZO--4 m>�_� 0m+i; mm;NZr zr IggI��77 A O c�"mFPcr<*)mm <z0 0 zNo<z_Mq�� [ZI O)�ZS O— ODO!<> 1Z_vm C-r F zo C mO:CW CD Am�m; 6%Cymru azozca') MM NfNOOm ._Z.i c m .. vm2,U--i coo;a Am; 66 Nm ATZO ZO-i m N'< DZOrZ*i f')O m;ODOUD, Z Z10m 1N jom��omZmzo A ;cm001cCCm Ofy+lmf�*1=cZZnym ')A_m>mFOm 1C O4rM CW z� �0. OnrA.i= D r 0mr 0 � O D Z m 4 O O m m �yy 7 N Z = 0 Z O z N N K0 oM rm N m Z 0 x Z -0D Z N v O )4m 7m j �• D 0 m Z I O Z M O z 0 >-AIT woo z 000c: rx- 2Nrr.)m0 �N x m D o Zm1 {�DnmvZ r mNxWO • Oo<NU) M mD00 mlmmm -00 S KD< *) C N=mr JZZrx+10N •� O ny *W N O 1 m mmaAA M-0 (AN m Z ZDAM z o 1 210 oWm m C) Z 1�0< mr')T m1 NmzmO C ZNi N0 OC_ O m N Z 1<pmo c-zi-4m ZD=-0 DzNrr) ;0o F MCo Lf) D C:--i � p Arm C '� s o r xZ0= v_ A m, N V) m�z�m U('�) _IO .r i CD Z :P;o zz0 70C mmNO V) ZMrWU* , z pC p `nmz� D005 Z 0-n-(, r M � $zz m V)Z2r O vO M mN O O O'nMCD = Latmc1 Zm0Z om� O Z m� MA 0 M- m m _i ZozoFOO Z r D E�mN N ZZmy M m' C FmFri 0=: m � f �C) ii <� . A A ZD m :� O m O A N O2 Z C O z N N �?.> z 6 ` A � N�l 0 O -,) < z N J- O fri Z ) 0 o� �) r i Oox rmr,) G) O m z•Dim Z0. oz M, Z moo �m PMD 0�N KDZ In 0 �.1 CO cox Fnyo, Z N r m CD mom (N- �6A oNmz 0 0 N =j y ;a m Z1 N x 0 C) -D-1 o�nlma -(NO.Z-17F Om ')CmMr (nop NOorm.) M Cf)=� mN1 om0M Jm f C M �Ormm mCm)om D_im> -<ZAoo 22-Dj m?Zx m co M 0-1OD M cm =m N D Z m-0-lo %� j`n mMFITT o • • .......,o Off• "► N -j; mZ, A C �..�O I>Z vJr1 's 0 m D Z 0 M C) O Z M �•I D M KM>O zN -Hmm< 0>zo D r OZ M> Z Z mm ZmO =zmf M0�0 DDO rmK z m iCA ;0 Z O U) 2 m va Z` J P4 0 F i .o 0 A D A �K xm Zc A N 0 0 z rr,) rz �r O - M my zm 1D z� mZ mm N m 2 N � 2 Fr, K O D 0 M 0 O s D z A T- A O 1 0 ? C A l/ 0D 6 D�r V) p vm) 6 N M r_ O (/) M f C o m --i - x- m0 .'im) Z m0 05 Z-- (A O m? Zi- O < Z nO 00 0� D v3) Z. mD z :OM m N m N 1 00 m x DO 0 0 o= Zz mK m •) m v N N A M 7: 0 0 0 D C z 0 D 0 m m m m M D 0 9: m = z N O cn N m rri Z o Ln m m A FOmZOMOANNm D m m 0 m r m c m C 01 O -Arm OK 1*DKA<1 �� mrxiN_immNx (/)ZDAm*ZO N- u NNWOO:q w CD0 1 C mczD=-i Nmx mr��N iMMWozmDbm (A (A U)C x O N O m Z occmqwxo Too A_1A = Oz ZjNm U)ZNDzcZNV) vm) A O-Ommomo gZoz D N r N(A M Z N D NSO�NOm SNO N Om-WZnOmAF G)r ZO mmrZZ Zm�0<,,- ErNm ON1N <:qm m Z m Z-< 0 O N p O ZU) 1M5zzm 2 D O �300(A- W m r m 0 D O U) 12 Z 05:mOmr�WDzO rcDo- Fm Zmpy*�OZ-oW mm1D m1Z Cp_r<.)ONormc O D jAmZ Cm<<Omo CZj NZm>AZ—O cm mp N CCO)O1 mZOo m-m00AmomD z iN Z Z 0 = r 0; c A m m mcoN�� omm N m �Am>znoor-M 'i O - 0 ') _n m Z Z Z 1 0 _ m N(/)>g> 3 m OOSZDrm� OOZDOmmZNI rnW Nr mmmm I- r In 0 M Z 0 3.1 r Z 0 j -0 n m M r� 0 O O m 0 U) r D O m 110c 0_n -9*DOD'ODN1OO(A5x xpcZMC m=N Wcmrxm,)m z y Z A o r m m- w r o m o Z i p Z. < A -- - L- mmmm o=WzzrmmmA=axF DmNOooww�N� ZAG)fA+1v DA�7NO�m�mrC O OD Dr-Dm mmZyr NDNOLnm mmrZO�ZxZm�00m m-4D mm Z�Om1200 0mx0 0ZOZxc 1m> M I--lcw mMr- CD ��0 �O mN M �Tl 'iN �mpmmm zmNZNvm) Om c-)Zm>zo -< -< OOZOZC) Z;umx- M mMmm,0C: mmNDOm �mAr*i zz+�'�=o <com om=ru➢o voZmr- MWKO M >mrp<m r O rrO N Z N 2 D Z 2 Z O m Z O D m m m 1 Z O m OD NMZ NE ODOf% 010ZmCmD� 0 ;b 1 mb r�m2 Q\ � 000 m m o ;0 W�< x N m 2 m n OWm m Na NmmmcDmWm mmmvz-+ mom�oNcr`/)E:OM{1 co 0 >Moy5mm mNvm)-o ONzA ZZ0>-<M[--� -HZ MAD M�ZN;ZZNDCZD➢-fFTI m D- N N z -um omoZ m O o O m C m Zm Z > Z 00 v N N m m O z m* p O v) w-DMOm 2 mkW2mm omo>omm Zmp=m"i2 v)00(nC Wm t�l„m Dun --HQ> ?mmzlrx.)mZ -<--lM45mmmmmouIM o -iv3imm�N om A7 moC)1=m�A x mm4c zoFNl�zx15 zi�l� Am!q- - Nm�-bOnz-iOZ002 zD4,Zmjs pmOmm-D-110N>om mo -ImO<M m2ZZi"MMKVS �0 M- 0ZXN�mI>"vz 3T---i *mNFommWmmmoZ' irm mr�-nrNm 0DCr0AZcOCZmmm=i Z 0 Ej -<; x�NmmODf/mI lxT10 (cnAZ mA zmmm �ZA _H ttn-N0 ODCD _0m O A(1/I fx*1K zDZfNrlmZ�fN*lz m fxT1 I I 10Nm I O m m 0 M K z m rx� O D m z o n 0 m m N P