Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
06-103491
i ` CITY OF CITY HALL A Federal Way lEczn Feder8th Avenue South•71 Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 n„ v. :r 000 Page e- 1 VYf L w. deralway.com J i2277! I JUN 2 2 2007 li _, 1 at ,,btu kJ La., City Clerks Office City of Federal way June 19, 2007 Pramod Gupta 32632 20th Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 RE: GUPTA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROCESS IV REQUEST STREAM BUFFER INTRUSION, FW# 06-103491-00-UP, Related File # 06-103493-00-SE Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find the Report and Decision of the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner relating to the above-entitled case. Very truly yours, e, N K. CAUSSEAUX, JR. HEARING EXAMINER SKC/ca • cc: All parties of record City of Federal Way I Page - 2 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) FW# 06-103491-00-UP GUPTA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ) STREAM BUFFER INTRUSION ) Related File # 06-103493-00-SE PROCESS IV ) I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION The applicant is requesting to intrude up to 77 feet into a 100-foot major stream buffer for development of a new single family residence and associated site improvements. II. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Hearing Date: June 5, 2007 Decision Date: June 19, 2007 At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence: 1. David Lee, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way 2. Steve Mackey, P.O. Box 65198, University Place, WA 98464 At the hearing the following exhibits were admitted as part of the official record of these proceedings: 1. Staff Report with all attachments 2. Power Point Presentation III. FINDINGS 1. The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into the record, viewed the site and taken this matter under advisement. 2. The Community Development Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable policies and provisions in this matter and is hereby marked as Exhibit "1" with Page - 3 • attachments and hereby incorporated in its entirety by this reference. 3. All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). 4. The applicant has a possessory ownership interest in a rectangular, 15,300 square foot parcel of property abutting the northwest corner of the intersection of 3rd Avenue SW and SW 295th Place within the City of Federal Way. The parcel abuts 3rd Avenue for 170 feet and 295' Place for 90 feet. A major stream as defined by Section 22-1 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) flows onto the parcel near its southwest corner, continuing north along the west property line, and exits the site near the center of said property line. Section 22-1306(a)(2) FWCC requires a 100 foot wide buffer from the ordinary high water mark of the stream. The stream and buffer area cover the entire parcel with the exception of a small triangle located in the northeast corner adjacent to 3`d Avenue SW. The applicant requests a variance to the buffer width requirements to allow construction of a single family residential home in the southeast corner of the site. 5. The site plan shows a two-story structure containing 1,640 square feet on the main floor and 1,490 square feet on the second floor for a total of 3,130 square feet. In addition, the applicant proposes a 368 square foot deck on the north side of the structure and a 122 square foot porch. The site plan shows a driveway extending west into the site from 3rd Avenue near the south property line. The driveway will add 775 square feet of impervious coverage. The total amount of new impervious coverage calculates to 3,165 square feet, and the area of the site remaining pervious calculates to 12,135 square feet. 6. The applicant proposes to control the storm drainage from the new impervious surfaces by directing it to a catch basin and from there to a dispersion trench north and down slope from the structure. The plan also shows a human use/yard area on all sides of the structure, but not extending closer than 23 feet from the ordinary high water mark of the stream. A split rail fence will separate the yard from the remaining stream buffer. The new residential structure will not extend no closer than 23 feet to the stream. The applicant proposes mitigation and enhancement of the remaining stream buffer by removal of Himalayan blackberries and replanting native trees and shrubs that will provide better buffer functions. According to the mitigation plan (Exhibit "C"), the applicant will enhance 5,964 square feet of stream buffer and will implement a three-year maintenance/monitoring period to include a bond in the amount of $14,580.81. 1 Page - 4 7. The site is located within the Medium Density Single Family designation of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and the Single Family Residential (RS 9.6) zone classification of the FWCC. Section 22-631 FWCC authorizes a detached single-family residential dwelling as an outright permitted use in the RS 9.6 classification on a minimum 9,600 square foot lot. The applicant proposes one single-family residential home on a 15,300 square foot lot. 8. The applicant requests to intrude into the required 100-foot setback from the major stream as authorized by Section 22-1312(c) FWCC. The applicant has the burden of showing that the request for such intrusion satisfies the criteria set forth in said section. Findings on each criteria are hereby made as follows: A. The proposal will not adversely affect water quality. The applicant will construct a new dispersion trench north of the single-family dwelling and will disperse stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces. New vegetation planted near the dispersion trench as part of the buffer mitigation will enhance water quality. During construction the applicant will implement a temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan. B. The project will not adversely affect the existing quality of wildlife habitat within the stream or setback area. Vegetation in the buffer presently consists of grass, ornamental plantings, and blackberries. The mitigation plan proposes hand removal of the blackberries and the planting of native plants and trees to provide an improved habitat. C. The storm drainage system serving the new improvements will ensure no adverse impacts to stormwater drainage or retention. D. The project will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor will it create erosion hazards. As previously found, the applicant will implement a temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan and the City will ensure construction occurs in accordance with building permit and other City code standards. A professional engineer will monitor and administer the recommendations of the geotechnical report and will also ensure implementation of Best Management Practices. E. The project will not materially detrimentally impact other property in the area nor the City as a whole, including loss of open space. Compliance with the conditions of approval, the preparation of the erosion and 1 Page - 5 sediment control plan, and construction in accordance with geotechnical recommendations will ensure no adverse impacts to downstream parcels. Improvement of the site will not result in a loss of designated open space. F. The intrusion is necessary for reasonable development of the property with one single family residential home. The applicant can make no use of the site without the intrusion since the stream and buffer cover approximately 98% of the site. The development will result in impervious coverage of approximately 21% of the gross lot area as compared with the 60% allowed in the RS 9.6 classification. While placing the home in the northeast portion of the site may result in less buffer intrusion, the present location creates the least impact on neighboring properties and is the safest due to the physical characteristics of the property and sound engineering practices. 9. The stream buffer intrusion is also subject to Process IV review pursuant to Chapter 22 FWCC. Prior to obtaining such review the applicant must establish that the proposal satisfies the criteria set forth in Section 22-445(c). Findings on each criteria are hereby made as follows: A. The proposed intrusion is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan which contemplates development of the site with a single family residential home. The project is also consistent with the goals and policies of the Natural Environment, Streams and Lakes (Surface Water Element)which authorizes new plantings within buffer areas to enhance a corridor's function. B. The City has reviewed the project under SEPA, the comprehensive plan, and Chapter 22 FWCC. Staff has found and the Examiner agrees that the project complies with all applicable provisions of the FWCC assuming compliance with conditions of approval. C. The project is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare pursuant to the reviews as set forth above. D. Third Avenue SW can accommodate the traffic generated by the dwelling, and utilities in the area are adequate. The lot must accommodate emergency vehicle access. E. The driveway access from 3`d Avenue is at the optical location and configuration for access as it will not create a further intrusion into the stream Page - 6 buffer. IV. CONCLUSIONS From the foregoing findings the Hearing Examiner makes the following conclusions: 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented by this request. 2. The request to intrude into the 100 foot wide major stream buffer to allow construction of a single family residential dwelling at a site located at the northwest corner of 3'd Avenue SW and 295'h Place within the City of Federal Way should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The stream buffer boundaries established by the final site plan and buffer mitigation/enhancement plan shall be reflected on all applicable construction drawings and permits. The split rail fence shall be constructed at the location identified on the site plan. In addition, prior to issuance of a construction permit, the applicant shall provide the City a landscape plan for approval for planting appropriate stream buffer vegetation adjacent to the split rail fence. The planting should be of a type to ultimately provide a dense vegetative buffer separating the human use area from the wetland buffer. Installation of the plantings shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the house. 2. As required by the Director of Community Development Services, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the proposed single-family residence, the applicant shall complete all elements of the proposed mitigation including the following: permanently separating the human use area of the lot from the remaining buffer with a split rail fence; removal (by hand) of invasive Himalayan blackberry; replanting of native species including various berry patches, shrubbery, various tall shrubbery, and trees to provide shade for the stream (per mitigation plan); and file with the city a three-year bond for monitoring/maintenance period for buffer enhancements. 3. The development activity is to take place no closer than 23 feet from the stream's ordinary high water mark (OHWM) as demarcated by the site plan stamped received on May 8, 2007. Page - 7 4. As required by the Directorof Community Development Services, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the single-family residence, the applicant shall record with the King County Recorders Office, the site plan and conditions approved by the Hearing Examiner under this application, and a separate document officially denoting the presence of critical areas on the site. DECISION: The request to intrude into the 100 foot wide major stream buffer to allow construction of a single family residential dwelling at a site located at the northwest corner of 3`d Avenue SW and 295th Place within the City of Federal Way is hereby granted subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions above: DATED THIS 19th DAY OF June, 2007 , Gi EN K. CAUSSEAUX, JR. Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 19th DAY OF June, 2007, to the following: APPLICANT: Pramod Gupta 32632 20th Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 OTHERS: Steve Mackey P.O. Box 65198 University Place, WA 98464 City of Federal Way c/o Laura Hathaway P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Page - 8 PROCESS IV Rights to Appeal Decisions of the hearing Examiner may be appealed by any person who is to receive a copy of that decision under FWCC Section 22-443. The appeal, in the form of a letter of appeal, must be delivered to the Department of Community Development Services within fourteen (14) calendar days after the issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision. The letter of appeal must contain: 2. A statement identifying the decision being appealed, along with a copy of the decision; 3. A statement of the alleged errors in the Hearing Examiner's decision, including specific factual finds and conclusions of the Hearing Examiner disputed by the person filing the appeal; and 4. The appellant's name, address, telephone number and fax number, and any other information to facilitate communications with the appellant. The person filing the appeal shall include, with the letter of appeal, the fee established by the City of the costs of preparing a written transcript of the hearing (or in the alternative, the appellant may prepare the transcript at his or her sole costs from tapes of the hearing provided by the City).The appeal will not be accepted unless it is accompanied by the required fee and cost (or agreement of the appellant to prepare the transcript). Appeals from the decision of the Hearing Examiner will be heard by The City Council. The decision of City Council is the final decision of the City. 4 © 0 ipv CITY OF Federal Way COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER GUPTA SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE PROCESS IV REQUEST STREAM BUFFER INTRUSION (Federal Way File No.06-103491-00-UP) PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 5,2007 FEDERAL WAY CITY HALL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 33325 EIGHTH AVENUE SOUTH Table of Contents I. Project Information and Background 2 II. Process IV Decision Requested 2 III. Environmental Review 3 IV. Comments Received on Application 3 V. Key Elements of Development Plan 3 VI. General Characteristics of Site and Vicinity 3 VII. Description of Critical Areas 4 VIII. Analysis of Requests and Decisional Criteria of FWCC Chapter 22,Article XIV, "Critical Areas"4 IX. Analysis of Request and Decisional Criteria of FWCC Chapter 22,Article VII, "Process IV Review—Hearing Examiner's Decision" 6 X. Findings for Decision 7 XI. Staff Recommendation 8 LIST OF EXHIBITS 9 Report Prepared by: David Lee,Associate Planner May 8,2007 b I. PROJECT INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND Name of Project: Gupta Single-Family Residence Stream Buffer Intrusion City File No(s): 06-103491-00-UP(Related Environmental File No. 06-103493-00-SE) Process IV Request: A proposed stream buffer intrusion is the subject of the Process IV Review Hearing Examiner's Decision. Staff Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Summary of Proposal:The applicant is requesting to intrude up to 77 feet into a 100-foot major stream buffer for development of a new single-family residence and associated site improvements. (Exhibits B and C—Site Plans) Site Location: The site address is 293xx 3'd Avenue SW, in Federal Way(Exhibit A— Vicinity Map). Applicant: Pramod Gupta 32632 20th Avenue SW Federal Way,WA 98023 Owner: Pramod Gupta 32632 20th Avenue SW Federal Way,WA 98023 Tax Parcel No: 119600-1465 Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations: The project site is zoned RS 9.6 and has a comprehensive plan designation of Medium-Density Single-Family. The proposed single-family residential use is an allowed use in the RS 9.6 zoning district. Key Dates: Land Use Application Filed: July 17, 2006 Application Determined Complete: • August 15,2006 Notice of Application Published: August 16,2006 Determination of Nonsigificance* - (DNS)Issued: December 27, 2006 (*No comments or appeals of the City's DNS were received by the respective comment and appeal deadline of January 11,2007.) Staff Representative: David Lee,Associate Planner, 253-835-2622 II. PROCESS IV DECISION REQUESTED The applicant is requesting to intrude into the 100-foot major stream buffer for development of a new single-family residence and associated site improvements.The applicant is proposing to Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner File No.06-103491-00-UP/om ID.39787 Gupta Single-Family Residence Process IV Request/Stream Buffer Intrusion Page 2 construct a new residence on an existing vacant lot.The new residential structure is proposed to be built 23 feet from the stream at the closest point.The applicant has also proposed a yard area(human use area)within the stream buffer.The human use area would consist of a five-foot strip along the side to the south,a five-foot to six-foot-wide rear strip to the west, and an eight-foot-wide deck area along the northern area of the structure.The yard area is proposed at 23 feet from the stream (ordinary high water mark)at the closest point.The applicant is proposing to implement buffer impact mitigation as follows: ceasing yard maintenance in a portion of the stream buffer; permanently separating the human use area of the lot from the remaining buffer with a split-rail fence; enhancing 4,665 square feet of existing stream buffer by hand removing invasive species and replanting native species; implementing a three-year maintenance/monitoring period; and providing a mitigation/enhancement bond of$14,580.81. The project site plan(Exhibits B and C)shows the proposed new residence,driveway, dispersion trench, enhancement area,split rail fencing, and yard area in relationship with the 100-foot stream buffer. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code(FWCC) Chapter 22,Article XIV,"Critical Areas,"and FWCC Chapter 22,Article VII, "Process IV Review,Hearing Examiner's Decision,"the requested wetland buffer and stream buffer intrusion are subject to Process IV review and a public hearing and decision by the Hearing Examiner. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),the City issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (Exhibit F) for the proposed action on December 27, 2006.During the public comment period on the Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS),no comments were received by the City. IV. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON APPLICATION No comments have been received on the application. V. KEY ELEMENTS OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN As context for the Process IV request,the following is an outline of the key elements of the overall site plan for the project: • Construction of a new 3,130 square-foot single-family residence with associated site improvements; • Construction of a new driveway; • Installation of a catch basin and dispersion trench; • Creation of a human use/yard area encompassing the structure along all sides but not any closer than 23 feet from the stream's eastern ordinary high water mark; • Installation of a split rail fence to separate human use areas and stream buffer areas; • Stream buffer enhancement/mitigation. VI. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SITE AND VICINITY The 15,300 square-foot parcel is currently undeveloped with existing single-family residences surrounding the parcel. 3rd Avenue SW is the primary road that services the lot and adjacent Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner File No.06-103491-00-UP/oc.rn 39787 Gupta Single-Family Residence Process IV Request/Stream Buffer Intrusion Page 3 properties.The site resides in an RS 9.6(Residential Single-Family 9600 square-foot minimum lot size)zone and the lot is not large enough to support any future short subdivisions.A major stream runs through the property,which enters the property at the southwest corner from a culvert and flows northwest along the western boundary until it reaches another culvert.Nearly the entire parcel is encumbered by the stream buffer. Approximately 336 square feet of the most northeasterly portion of the site is located outside of the 100-foot major stream buffer.The lot is sparsely vegetated with pockets of blackberry and is primarily covered by grassy areas east of the stream that have been maintained by mowing and planted with ornamental plants. Detailed discussion regarding the site characteristics including the on-site stream are contained in the March 7,2006 Stream Classification for Property Located near 29310 3rd Ave SW(stamped received by the City of Federal Way on July 17,2006) Sheldon&Associates,Inc. (Exhibits D). VII. DESCRIPTION OF CRITICAL AREA As previously mentioned,the major stream enters from the southwest corner and flows northwest along the western boundary and into another culvert.The stream eventually flows directly into Puget Sound(approximately .15 miles away from the subject site)and is not tributary to another major stream.No natural migration barriers for anadromous fish exist between the beach and the property. Existing culverting underneath SW 293`d Street is a possible man-made barrier to adult salmonid migration from Puget Sound to the property. The stream is fed by groundwater seeps and stormwater runoff and flows continuously through the year. The stream channel, on average, is three feet wide and two inches deep. VIII. ANALYSIS OF REQUESTS AND DECISIONAL CRITERIA AT FWCC CHAPTER 22,ARTICLE XIV,"CRITICAL AREAS" Stream Buffer Intrusion: The table below analyzes the request to locate improvements within the buffer of a major stream pursuant to the applicable decisional criteria.The decisional criteria that pertain to the proposed development within the required stream buffer area are contained in FWCC Section 22-1312(c) "Other Improvements". TABLE 1. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST AND"CRITICAL AREA INTRUSION—FOR STREAM SETBACK"DECISIONAL CRITERIA(FWCC SECTION 22-1312(0 Request: Intrusion into the 100-foot major stream setback Decisional Criteria Staff Analysis "It will not adversely affect This criterion has been met.The applicant's proposal includes the construction of a new water quality."(Criterion dispersion trench directly north of the proposed structure.Surface waters are to be captured #1,§22-1312[c](1) by a new catch basin to the southeast of the structure and released within the dispersion trench.The new vegetation to be planted as part of the mitigation near the dispersion trench will enhance existing water quality.The applicant must also provide and implement a temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan for the project. "It will not adversely affect This criterion has been met.The intrusion into the stream buffer will not affect the wildlife the existing quality of as the existing site is mainly composed of maintained grassy areas,ornamental plantings, wildlife habitat within the and invasive species such as blackberries.The applicant has proposed to implement several stream or setback area." mitigations to improve the quality of the stream wildlife habitat including the hand removal (Criterion#2, §22- of invasive species and the planting of more thick native plants and trees which will 1312[c](2) provide an overall better habitat than the existing conditions. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner File No.06-1 0349 1-00-UP/Doi I.D.39787 Gupta Single-Family Residence Process IV Request/Stream Buffer Intrusion Page 4 TABLE 1. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST AND "CRITICAL AREA INTRUSION—FOR STREAM SETBACK"DECISIONAL CRITERIA(FWCC SECTION 22-13120) Request: Intrusion into the 100-foot major stream setback Decisional Criteria Staff Analysis "It will not adversely affect This criterion has been met.As previously stated,the applicant's proposal includes the drainage or stormwater construction of a new dispersion trench directly north of the proposed structure.Surface retention capabilities." waters are to be captured by a new catch basin to the southeast of the structure and released (Criterion#3, §22- within the dispersion trench. 1312[c](3) "It will not lead to unstable This criterion has been met.As previously stated,the applicant will be required to develop earth conditions nor create and implement a temporary erosion and sediment control(TESC)plan. Construction of the erosion hazards."(Criterion site in accordance with final storm drainage,grading,and erosion control plans,subject to #4, §22-1312[c](4) City review and approval, will ensure no adverse impact to earth conditions.Furthermore, the City will recommend that a professional engineer monitor and administer the recommendations of the geotechnical report and also execute the Best Management Practices(BMP's)as recommended by the geotechnical report. "It will not be materially This criterion has been met.As previously stated,the applicant will be required to develop detrimental to any other and implement a temporary erosion and sediment control(TESC)plan.Construction of the property in the area nor to site in accordance with final storm drainage,grading,and erosion control plans,are subject the City as a whole, to City review and approval,and will ensure the proposal will not result in detrimental including loss of open impacts to any other property or the City as a whole.The proposal includes implementation space."(Criterion#5, §22- of several mitigation elements within the buffer,which are intended to enhance the stream 1312[c](5) buffer areas.Flooding of downstream properties is not an anticipated effect of this proposal.There will be no loss of designated open spaces as a result of this project. "It is necessary for This criterion has been met.As depicted on the site plan,approximately 98 percent of the reasonable development of 15,300 square-foot site is within the 100-foot major stream setback.The site cannot be the subject property." developed with a home and associated improvements including a new driveway,and (Criterion#6, §22-1312[c] narrow(five-foot-wide)usable yard area,without intrusion into the stream setback.New (6). impervious surfaces will comprise of 3,165 square feet which is only approximately 35% of the developable area(60%in RS 9.6 Zone/9,180 square feet)had the site been devoid of the stream and stream setback.The location of the home as depicted on the site plan was specifically chosen due to environmental and engineering feasibility/practicality.The storm drainage trench was designed to be placed at the furthest southern portion of the property as possible to allow for the proposed single-family home to be placed at the extreme north end of the property as possible;therefore,creating the lowest impact to the stream buffer as possible.However,after considering the value and safety of the structure being sited at the northern location and the impact on the neighboring property,the City has concurred with the concerns of the applicant's engineer Gary A.Flowers.Therefore,the City has determined that the home is sited in the most optimal location to allow for reasonable development of the subject property based upon physical characteristics of the project and sound engineering practices.The City is recommending that the proposed structure and human use areas be constricted to no closer than 23 feet of the stream's western ordinary high water mark. This area will be demarcated by a split rail fence as depicted by the site plan. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner File No.06-103491-00-UP/6«1 n 39787 Gupta Single-Family Residence Process IV Request/Stream Buffer Intrusion Page 5 IX. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST AND DECISIONAL CRITERIA OF FWCC CHAPTER 22,ARTICLE VII,"PROCESS IV REVIEW—HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION" In addition to the decisional criteria noted in the table above,pursuant to FWCC Section 22-445[c] [1-5], the Hearing Examiner may approve the stream buffer intrusion request only if the following Process IV decisional criteria are met.Decisional criteria and staff comments are provided below. TABLE 2. ANALYSIS OF HEARING EXAMINER REVIEW PROCESS IV DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWCC SECTION 22-445(c) Decisional Criteria Staff Analysis It is consistent with the This criterion has been met.The comprehensive plan is used,among other comprehensive plan. documents,as a basis for implementing regulations such as zoning and the (Criterion#1, § 22- State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA).The proposed single-family 445[c](1)) residence,of which the Process IV request is a component,has undergone SEPA review,and must comply with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP).The Process IV request was reviewed and determined to be consistent with the following goals and policies contained in FWCP,Natural Environment,Streams and Lakes(Surface Water): "The City will seek to retain native vegetation within riparian corridors.New planting of vegetation with the approval from the City may be required where such re-vegetation will enhance the corridor's function.Consideration should be given to the removal of non-native invasive species."(Goal NEP33, FWCP) It is consistent with all This criterion has been met.The Process IV request has been reviewed under SEPA; applicable provisions of the FWCP;all applicable provisions of FWCC Chapter 22,"Zoning";all applicable this chapter and all other decision criteria pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22,Article XIV,"Critical Areas";FWCC applicable laws. Chapter 22,Article VII,"Process IV Review-Hearing Examiner's Decision";and is (Criterion#1, § 22- consistent with all applicable provisions and laws,provided all recommended 445[c](2)) conditions of approval are met. It is consistent with the This criterion has been met.The proposed stream buffer intrusion and proposed public health,safety,and mitigations are consistent with the public health,safety,and welfare.No new impacts welfare. (Criterion#1,§ to the streams are anticipated as a result of the proposal.The Process IV request has 22-445[c](3)) been reviewed under SEPA;the FWCP;all applicable provisions of FWCC Chapter 22,"Zoning";all applicable decision criteria pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22,Article XIV,"Critical Areas";FWCC Chapter 22,Article VII,"Process IV Review-Hearing Examiner's Decision";and is consistent with all applicable provisions and laws, provided all recommended conditions of approval are met. The streets and utilities This criterion has been met.The Process IV stream buffer intrusion request does not by in the area of the subject itself generate demand on adjacent streets and utilities.However,construction of the property are adequate to proposed single-family residence will be required to facilitate emergency vehicle serve the anticipated access,as required by the FWCC and FWCP.No significant adverse transportation or demand from the utility impacts were identified by the City of Federal Way in the DNS issued for the proposal.(Criterion#1, § proposed action. 22-445[c](4)) The proposed access to This criterion has been met.The proposed access and configuration is at the optimal the subject property is at location by not intruding further into the stream buffer for purposes of roads or the optimal location and driveways. configuration for access. (Criterion#1, § 22- 445[c](5)) Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner File No.06-103491-00-UP/u«I D.39787 Gupta Single-Family Residence Process IV Request/Stream Buffer Intrusion Page 6 T X. FINDINGS FOR DECISION Based on an analysis of the Process IV application,the environmental record, and applicable decisional criteria,the Department of Community Development Services finds that: 1. The applicant is requesting an intrusion into an environmentally critical area,a major stream, requiring a 100-foot buffer.The applicant has requested intrusions into the critical area buffer located on the site,in order to: facilitate development of a new single-family residence,new driveway, and human use/yard area. 2. The requested stream buffer intrusion would result in the new structure and human use/yard area being located approximately 23 feet from the stream at the closest point from the ordinary high water mark. 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA),the City issued a Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS) for the project on December 27,2006. The City's Responsible SEPA Official reviewed the environmental checklist and Process N request and determined that application of all City of Federal Way codes,policies,and regulations will adequately address any environmental impacts related to the Process IV request. 4. The applicant is proposing several elements of stream buffer mitigation and enhancement as follows:permanently separating the human use area of the lot from the remaining buffer with a split rail fence;removal (by hand)of invasive Himalayan blackberry;replanting of native species including various berry patches and shrubbery and various tall shrubbery and trees to provide shade for the stream; and a three-year bonded monitoring/maintenance period for buffer enhancements.The purpose of the enhancements is to improve soil stability along stream bank and also improve water quality.In addition, staff is recommending that the applicant provide a permanent demarcation of the stream buffer edge in addition to the split rail fencing, appropriate vegetation should be planted within the stream buffer adjacent to the fence.The planting should be of a type to ultimately provide a dense vegetative buffer separating the human use area from the wetland buffer.The existing grassy areas located north of the proposed structure are to be used only for buffer purposes and human use is not allowed in the buffer area. 5. The application was reviewed and found that the house and human use/yard area meet the decisional criteria of FWCC Section 22-1312(f),allowing intrusion into the 100-foot setback of a major stream,provided all recommended conditions of Process IV approval are met.The analysis of the stream buffer intrusion contained in Table 1, Section IX of this report is incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. 6. The application was reviewed and found that the Process N decisional criteria of FWCC Section 22-445 has been met provided all recommended conditions of Process N approval are met. The analysis contained in Section IX of this report is incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. 7. Reports,letters, and plans submitted by the applicant for the Process N request and reviewed by the City are identified in the exhibits list below.The reports, letters, and plans are incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner File No.06-I03491-00-UP/o«I .39787 Gupta Single-Family Residence Process IV Request/Stream Buffer Intrusion Page 7 8. Implementation of a final Mitigation Plan and all recommended conditions of project approval, and the City's review and approval of final construction drawings pursuant to all applicable codes and development regulations, will ensure that the project results in no adverse affect on: water quality; quality of wildlife habitat; drainage or stormwater retention capabilities; earth stability and erosion; and other property in the area or the City as a whole. XI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the above analysis,the Department of Community Development Services recommends approval of the stream buffer intrusion to allow development of the subject property as depicted on the site plan Exhibits B and C, subject to the conditions listed below: 1. The stream buffer boundaries established by the final site plan and buffer mitigation/ enhancement plan shall be reflected on all applicable construction drawings and permits.The split rail fence shall be constructed at the location identified on the site plan. In addition,prior to issuance of a construction permit,the applicant shall provide the City a landscape plan for approval for planting appropriate stream buffer vegetation adjacent to the split rail fence.The planting should be of a type to ultimately provide a dense vegetative buffer separating the human use area from the wetland buffer.Installation of the plantings shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the house. 2. As required by the Director of Community Development Services,prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the proposed single-family residence,the applicant shall complete all elements of the proposed mitigation including the following:permanently separating the human use area of the lot from the remaining buffer with a split rail fence;removal (by hand)of invasive Himalayan blackberry;replanting of native species including various berry patches, shrubbery,various tall shrubbery, and trees to provide shade for the stream(per mitigation plan); and file with the city a three-year bond for monitoring/maintenance period for buffer enhancements. 3. The development activity is to take place no closer than 23 feet from the stream's ordinary high water mark(OHWM)as demarcated by the site plan stamped received on May 8,2007. 4. As required by the Director of Community Development Services,prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the single-family residence,the applicant shall record with the King County Recorders Office,the site plan and conditions approved by the Hearing Examiner under this application, and a separate document officially denoting the presence of critical areas on the site. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner File No.06-103491-00-UP/r0.i.o 39787 Gupta Single-Family Residence Process IV Request/Stream Buffer Intrusion Page 8 1 LIST OF EXHIBITS Note: Copies of the exhibits listed below are not attached to all copies of this report. All exhibits have been provided to the Hearing Examiner. Copies of exhibits may be obtained upon request at the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services. A. Vicinity Map. B. Site Plan by Thompson Civil &Construction Engineering stamped resubmitted by City of Federal Way May 8, 2007. C. Mitigation Plan by J.S.Jones&Associates,Inc.Environmental Consultants stamped resubmitted by City of Federal Way May 18,2007. D. Stream Classification For Property Located Near 29310 3rd Ave SW In Federal Way,Washington prepared by Sheldon &Associates, Inc. stamped received by City of Federal Way July 17,2006. E. Geotechnical Report by Gary A.Flowers,PLLC stamped received by City of Federal Way July 17, 2006; Addendum stamped resubmitted April 6,2007; Addendum stamped resubmitted by City of Federal Way May 2, 2007. F. Surface Water Analysis by Gary F.Thompson stamped resubmitted October 17,2006 by City of Federal Way. G. Final Staff Evaluation,Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS)by City of Federal Way. • Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner File No.06-I 0349 I-00-UP/noc.I D.39787 Gupta Single-Family Residence Process IV Request/Stream Buffer Intrusion Page 9 Gary A. Flowers, PLLC Geological & Geotechnical Consulting 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,WA 98155-1106 July 5,2006 Project No. 06-046 RECEIVED Mackey Enterprises, LLC J U L, 1 7 2 0 0 E P.O. Box 65198 University Place, WA 98464 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. Attention: Mr. Steve Mackey Subject: Geological/Geotechnical Assessment Proposed Gupta Residence 193xx 3rd Ave SW, Federal Way, Washington Dear Mr. Mackey: This report presents the results of our geological/geotechnical evaluation of the approximate 15,300 square foot property located at 193xx 3rd Ave SW in the Redondo area of Federal Way, Washington. Based on the site plan provided to us, a new,two story, single family residence will be developed on the southern half of the property The purpose of our site evaluation was to document existing shallow soil and ground water conditions on the property, and to provide geotechnical design recommendations for construction of the proposed improvements. EXISTING SITE CONDITONS The subject site is a rectangular shaped parcel measuring 90 feet in the east-west direction by 170 feet in the north-south direction. The eastern two-thirds of the parcel has a gentle slope from southeast to northwest with an elevation differential of about 20 feet over the 170 foot length or an approximate 12 percent slope. There are two steps in the property that appear to be man made. These steps are indicative of past grading and likely placement of fill materials on the site. The western portion of the site is defined by a stream channel that trends in a southeast to northwest direction. The channel is about 6 feet deep at the south end and deepens to 14 to 16 feet towards the north. The steepest part of the stream channel occurs at the approximate midpoint of the property near the north end of the house. At this location the sidewall of the channel has an approximate 80 percent slope. A stream was observed flowing in the bottom of the channel. Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 1 Gupta Residence Geological/Geotechnical Services Report 193xx 3rd Ave SW,Federal Way, Washington Vegetation on the property consisted primarily of grass over the eastern portion of the site. The stream channel was heavily vegetated with blackberry bushes. Other than the existing stream, there were no observed indications of flowing or standing water on the property. No signs of erosion were observed anywhere on the property. Subsurface Soil and Ground Water Conditions In order to characterize the shallow subsurface soil and ground water conditions on the property a series of 6 exploration pits were excavated on the site with a backhoe provided by the client. The pits were observed by an experienced engineering geologist who logged the soils exposed in the pits. The following logs provide a detailed evaluation of the encountered conditions. The locations of the pits is shown on the attached Site and Exploration Plan. EP-l 0 - 4" Sod/organic soil 4"—7' Loose, moist, intermixed brown and blackish brown, silty SAND to sandy SILT with some gravel and asphaltic pavement debris. (FILL) 7' —8' Loose, saturated, bluish gray, silty fine SAND 8' — 10' Medium dense to dense, very moist, silty SAND with gravel (Glacial Till) BOH @ 10' Minor caving in fill soils. Rapid ground water seepage at 7'. EP-2 0 - 12" Sod/organic soil 12"—3.5' Loose, moist, intermixed brown and blackish brown, silty SAND to sandy SILT with some gravel and asphaltic pavement debris. (FILL) 3.5' —6' Medium dense to dense, very moist, silty SAND with gravel (Glacial Till) BOH @ 6' Minor caving in fill soils. Rapid ground water seepage at 4'. EP-3 0 -24" Sod/organic soil 24"—4.5' Loose, moist, brown silty SAND. Thickens to 5.5 feet in western portion of pit nearest stream channel with abundant large cobbles and boulders(FILL) 4.5' —6' Dense,moist, silty SAND with gravel (Glacial Till) BOH @ 6' Minor caving in fill soils. Gary A. Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 2 Gupta Residence Geological/Geotechnical Services Report 193xx 3rd Ave SW, Federal Way, Washington EP-4 0 - 16" Sod/organic soil 16"—4' Medium dense to dense, very moist, silty SAND with gravel (Glacial Till) EP-5 0 - 15" Sod/organic soil 15"—4' Medium dense to dense,very moist, silty SAND with gravel (Glacial Till) EP-6 0—7.5' Loose, moist, brown, silty SAND to sandy SILT with gravel, cobbles, asphalt debris and a tree stump (FILL) 7.5' —8.5' Medium dense, saturated,bluish gray, silty fine SAND BOH @ 8.5' Minor caving in fill soils. Very rapid ground water seepage at 8'. According to the Geologic Map of King County, Washington, by Booth, Haugerud and Sacket, 2002. the site is mapped near the boundary of Qvt (Vashon lodgement till) and Qpfc (pre-Fraser sedimentary deposits. Our findings are in general agreement with the published geologic map of the area Hydrology No indication of standing or flowing water was present on the property at the time of our field work except within the established stream channel. There was no evidence of erosion anywhere on the parcel. Water table was encountered in exploration pits EPA, EP-2 and EP-6 at the time of our field study. The water typically was atop the underlying glacial till and was contained within a think layer of bluish gray silty sand. Ground water seepage was rapid in EP-1 and EP-2 and was very rapid in EP-6. Depth to ground water was 7 to 8 feet in EP-l and EP-6. Depth to ground water in EP-2 was 4 feet. Seismic Hazards Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: 1) surficial ground rupture; 2) seismically induced landslides; 3) liquefaction; and 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these to impact the site is discussed below. The nearest known or suspected fault is the Tacoma Fault Zone thought to be located 6 to 8 miles to the south in the area of Point Defiance. The Tacoma Fault Zone and other nearby faults are being currently studied by the United States Geological Service (USGS) and have been Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 3 Gupta Residence GeologicaUGeotechnical Services Report 193xx 3rd Ave SW, Federal Way, Washington determined to be active and capable of producing large earthquakes. Much is still to be learned about these fault systems but it is generally hypothesized that their recurrence interval is several thousand years. Due to the suspected long recurrence interval and the distance to known fault traces, the potential for surficial ground rupture is considered to be low during the expected life of the proposed structure. The site lacks steep slopes except for a small area of the stream channel that is oversteepened due to the placement of fill soils. Foundations in this area will penetrate to suitable bearing soils. Thus, it is our opinion that the potential risk of damage to the proposed structure, by seismically induced landsliding, is low. The risk of liquefaction is low due to the dense nature of the underlying sediments encountered below the fill soils. Based on the site stratigraphy, it is our opinion that any earthquake damage to the proposed structure, if founded on a suitable bearing strata, and following recommendations presented within this report, would be caused by the intensity and acceleration associated with the event and not any of the above-discussed impacts. According to Table 1615.1.1 of the 2003 International Building Code (IBC) guidelines the subject project is identified as Site Class C. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS On the basis of our geologic research and field explorations, the approximate southern one-half of the subject site has been impacted by past grading and filling. Up to 71/2 feet of fill was encountered. The fill begins near the east side and thickens towards the west along the top of the stream channel. The fill contains various amounts of asphalt debris, rocks and an occasional stump. These materials are unsuitable for structural support of the proposed residence without some mitigation. The northern approximate one-half of the subject site does not appear to have been impacted by the past grading and filling. For the chosen house location it will be necessary to extend the foundations through the fill and into the underlying native, dense to very dense silty sand with gravel. This can be accomplished with small diameter pipe piles, drilled piers, or by excavating the unsuitable soils and either casting a deep foundation or backfilling the trench with a suitable material and using a standard spread footing foundation. For slab-on-grade concrete floors it will be necessary to perform some excavation and structural backfilling. The on site fill soils and the in-situ native soils both contain significant amounts of fine grained materials and are moisture sensitive. If these soils are worked during inclement weather they may require special handling and care. If these soils are over optimum in their moisture content, they will be easily disturbed and additional, unplanned excavation may be necessary. Therefore, Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 4 Gupta Residence Geological/Geotechnical Services Report 193xx 3rd Ave SW, Federal Way, Washington the owner/contractor should be prepared to provide import granular material, as needed, for structural backfill on the project. Since the foundations loads will extend through the existing fill soils to suitable bearing soils at depths of about 7 to 8 feet below existing grade on the west side of the house, no further setback requirement is needed for placement of the house in relation to the stream channel side slope. Although the underlying soils are grossly stable, the loose fill soils at the top of the stream channel should be considered as only marginally stable. As such,the owner/contractor should be aware that under certain seismic and saturated conditions some movement of these soils could occur. Movement of these soils will have no impact upon the proposed structure provided the recommendations contained herein are followed in the design of the house. Site Grading The site should be cleared of all vegetation and topsoil that is not required as part of the landscape plan. These materials should be removed from the site or stored for future landscape use. Any non-organic soils that are to be reused on the site as structural backfill should be kept covered at all times and protected from the weather except if they require drying. If structural fill is placed it must be compacted to a dense, nonyielding condition. Structural fill is defined as non-organic soil, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts with each lift being compacted to a dense, non-yielding condition prior to installation of the succeeding lift. If the area of driveways and concrete slab-on-grade floors the subgrade must be significantly improved in order to provide suitable support. At a minimum, the upper 12 inches of unsuitable fill soils (beneath the organic topsoil) should be removed. The exposed soils should be compacted to a dense, nonyielding condition with a compactor capable of relatively deep penetration (hoe-pac, riding vibratory drum compactor or large walk behind vibratory drum compactor, etc.). Any soft or yielding areas should be further excavated to firm soils and backfilled with compacted crushed rock or structural fill. The area should then be brought up to slab subgrade elevation with imported sand and gravel or crushed rock that is compacted to a dense, unyielding condition. The contractor and owner must be aware that hidden debris such as stumps and other organic materials within the remaining fill soils in these areas can cause future maintenance issues. The only way to totally remove all future risk is to fully remove the unsuitable fill soils and replace them with documented structural fill. In the case of utility trench backfill, the structural fill should be placed and compacted in accordance with current local or county codes and standards. The top of all compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the location of perimeter footings or pavement edges before sloping down at a maximum angle of 2H:l V. Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 5 • Gupta Residence Geological/Geotechnical Services Report 193xx 3rd Ave SW,Federal Way, Washington Foundation Recommendations Due to the presence of loose silty sand to sandy silt fill soils that contain asphalt debris, large rocks and occasional organic debris (stump) it will be necessary to either remove all of the unsuitable soils and replace them with approved structural fill or transfer the foundation loads through the unsuitable soils to the underlying dense silty sand with gravel soils. Based on our previous conversations with Steve Mackey, the option for total removal of the existing fill soils was not considered feasible. As such, we have provided various options for extending the foundation loads through the fill soils. Two alternatives are available for deep support, including small diameter pipe piles and drilled concrete piers. Based on the exploration pits placed on the subject site, bearing soils were encountered beginning at a depth of 2 to 4 feet (east side) to 7.5 feet (west side) below existing ground surface. Therefore, pile lengths will vary depending upon encountered conditions and site grades at the time of installation. Driven pipe piles require very dense soils or significant penetration into medium dense to dense soils to reach effective refusal. As such, we are unsure how deep the piles will go to meet refusal criteria. However, pile lengths on the order of 10 to 25 feet should be expected. Drilled concrete piers must be extended a minimum of 5 feet into the underlying native soils. As such, drilled concrete pier lengths of 9 to 14 feet should be expected. Small Diameter Pipe Piles The piles should be Schedule 40 galvanized steel pipe that is driven to refusal into the underlying natural, dense sediments with an air or hydraulic hammer. The following table indicates the allowable pile capacities based upon past experience and industry standards. The refusal criteria in the table indicate the maximum amount of pile penetration allowed over a specified period of sustained driving. Table 1 Small Diameter Pipe Pile Recommendations Min.Hammer Pile Diameter Allowable Axial Capacity Wt. Refusal Criteria 3-inch 12 kips 850 lbs 1 inch/ 10 sec 3-inch 12 kips 1100 lbs 1 inch/6 sec 4-inch 20 kips 850 lbs 1 inch/ 16 sec r 4-inch 20 kips 1100 lbs 1 inch/ 10 sec Each pile or group of piles should be connected to other piles using a grade beam. Resistance to lateral loads would be provided by a combination of passive soil resistance against the grade Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 6 Gupta Residence Geological/Geotechnical Services Report 193xx 3rd Ave SW, Federal Way, Washington beam and bending of the pile. A passive equivalent fluid pressure equal to 200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) can be used against the grade beams when backfilled with suitably compacted and approved structural fill. The structural fill must be full height against the grade beam and extend a minimum distance of 3 feet away from the grade beam before sloping down at a maximum slope of 2H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical). The structural fill must be compacted in lifts to a dense, non-yielding condition. Batter piles can also be used to resist lateral loads. The lateral resistance would be equal to the horizontal component of the axial pile load. The maximum recommended batter is 1H:4V. Drilled Concrete Piers A series of drilled concrete piers would also be suitable for foundation support. Based upon the conditions encountered it appears that the piers would have to be about 10 to 15 feet in length to reach, and be suitably embedded into, a bearing layer. The piers would then connect to a grade beam support system for the building foundation. Allowable capacities for the drilled piles are given in Table 2. Table 2 Drilled Pier Recommendations Recommended Approximate Minimum Estimated Allowable Drilled Pier Depth to Embedment into Total Pile Vertical Diameter Embedment Bearing Length Capacity (inches) (feet) (feet) (feet) (tons) 16 5-10 5 10-15 25 18 5-10 5 10-15 30 Allowable lateral capacities of 2.5 tons and 3.5 tons per pile can be used assuming a fixed head condition and a maximum t/4 inch of deflection at the ground surface for 16- and 18-inch piers, respectively, assuming the embedment depth listed above in Table 1. The capacities presented above are predicated on a minimum 5-foot embedment into the dense silty sand with gravel soils encountered in our exploration pits. The actual total length of each pier will be determined and adjusted in the field based on required capacity and conditions encountered during installation and may be different than estimated above. Since completion of the pier takes place below ground, the judgment and experience of the geotechnical engineer or his field representative must be used as a basis for determining the required penetration and acceptability of each pile. Consequently, use of the presented capacities in the design requires that a qualified geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist from our firm, who will interpret and collect the installation data and examine the contractor's operations, Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 7 Gupta Residence Geological/Geotechnical Services Report 193xx 3rd Ave SW,Federal Way, Washington inspect all piles. In addition, if driven pipe piles are used for foundation support we would determine the required lengths of the piles and keep records of pertinent installation data. A final summary report would then be distributed following completion of pile installation. Crushed Rock, CDF, or Lean Mix Trenches Another alternative for foundation support could be provided by construction of trenches that extend down to the medium dense to very dense natural sediments and are filled with either 2 to 4-inch crushed rock, controlled density fill (CDF), or lean mix concrete. For crushed rock filled trenches, we recommend a minimum trench width of 4 feet. For CDF filled trenches, we recommend a minimum width of 36 inches. Trenches to be filled with lean mix concrete should be excavated sufficiently wide enough to extend a minimum of 3 inches beyond either side of the overlying footing. Because of the potential for caving, actual trench widths may be greater than that specified. The use of a larger, track-mounted excavator will greatly speed trench excavation over the use of a conventional rubber tired backhoe. In order to reduce the disturbance of the bearing soils exposed in the trench, it is strongly advised that the bucket be equipped with a smooth cutting edge. To determine when suitable bearing has been achieved, and to verify proper placement of crushed rock, CDF, or lean mix concrete, the geotechnical engineer or his representative must be present on a full-time basis during trench excavation and backfill. Rapid to very rapid ground water seepage was encountered within three of the exploration pits. As such, the contractor should be equipped with a pump in the event that control of ground water seepage is required to allow visual determination of the bearing soils. Any seepage entering the excavation on an overnight basis must be removed prior to commencing trench excavation the following day. After the bearing stratum has been reached, the trench should be immediately backfilled. For trenches to be filled with crushed rock, we recommend the use of 2-to 4-inch-sized crushed rock for backfill. Crushed rock must be tamped into place to achieve a tightly packed mass; this may be done with either a hoe-pac mounted on the excavator or,more typically,with the bucket of the backhoe itself. Staging areas should be maintained so that the rock is not contaminated by mud prior to placement in the trench. For CDF filled trenches, we recommend a minimum strength for the CDF of 250 pounds per square inch(psi). For lean mix concrete trenches,we recommend a minimum 2 sack mix. Spread footings may be used for building support when placed over properly constructed trenches filled with either crushed rock, CDF, or lean mix concrete as described above. Footings placed in this manner may be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf including both dead and live loads. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. However, all rock, CDF, or lean mix concreted filled trenches must penetrate to the Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 8 Gupta Residence Geological/Geotechnical Services Report 193.=3rd Ave SW, Federal Way, Washington prescribed bearing stratum and no trenches should be founded in or above loose, organic, or existing uncontrolled fill soils. In addition, it is critical that all footings are centered over the trenches and have a minimum width of 16 inches for the proposed two-story structure. Any footing that is not centered over the trench must be further evaluated prior to concrete placement, and may require additional trench excavation and backfill to obtain sufficient support. For these foundation methods, resistance to lateral loads on the structure can be provided by passive earth pressure on footings and stem walls and sliding resistance of the concrete foundations and slabs on the crushed rock, CDF or lean mix materials. We recommend the use of 300 pcf for passive pressure and a coefficient of sliding friction of 0.5. For crushed rock filled trenches, a drainpipe must be designed into one or more trenches in order to provide drainage out of the crushed rock. The pipe should be set at the lowest elevation possible and still obtain positive drainage. Since it will only be intercepting clean ground water the pipe should discharge to the stream channel on the west side of the site. Deep Spread Footing Support The final alternative would be to simply excavate to bearing soils and construct a typical spread footing foundation with extended stem walls and columns. At stated above bearing soils will be encountered at depths ranging from 4 to 9 feet below existing grade. Where ground water is encountered it must be controlled continually until the foundations are cast. Once the excavation is completed and approved it is recommended that a minimum 6 inch thick layer of crushed rock be placed in the bottom of the excavation to protect the bearing soils from disturbance. Depending upon the amount of ground water encountered it may be necessary to establish a drain out of the excavation similar to the drain recommended for the crushed rock filled trench. Safe slope excavations must be provided. For the loose fill soils we do not recommend an excavation steeper than 1.5H:1 V. Footings placed in this manner can be designed for an allowable soil bearing value of 2,500 psf including both dead and live loads. An increase of one-third may be used for short term wind and seismic loading. All disturbed material must be removed from the footing excavation prior to concrete placement. Resistance to lateral loads on the structure can be provided by passive earth pressure on footings and stem walls and sliding resistance of the concrete foundations and slabs on the soil. We recommend the use of 300 pcf for passive pressure and a coefficient of sliding friction of 0.4. Anticipated settlement of footings founded on approved rock, CDF, or lean mix concrete trenches, or on undisturbed dense native soils, should be less than 1 inch total and 1/2 inch differential between comparably loaded foundations. However, disturbed material not removed from the trenches prior to concrete placement could result in increased settlements. All footing Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 9 Gupta Residence Geological/Geotechnical Services Report 193xx 3rd Ave SW, Federal Way, Washington areas should be inspected by our firm prior to placing concrete, to verify that the trenches are undisturbed and construction conforms to the recommendations contained in this report. Such inspections may be required by the governing municipality. Retaining Walls At this time we are unaware of any retaining walls planned for the project. If walls under 8 feet high are planned they should be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf if free to rotate and 55 pcf if fixed, with level backfill. Passive resistance would be 250 pcf. Any retaining walls taller than 3 feet must be lined with a minimum of 12 inches of washed rock to within 1 foot of finish grade or an approved drainage mat such a MiraDrain or IncaDrain. The washed rock or drainage mat must tie into the footing drain. Floor Support Recommendations For slab-on-grade floors the subgrade should be prepared as discussed in the Site Grading section of this report. This will involve a minimum of 12 inches of overexcavation, compaction to a firm and unyielding condition and backfilling to subgrade elevation with compacted, structural fill. As stated above, the recommended subgrade section will help to mitigate most concerns with the fill underlying the slab areas. However, unknown materials within the fill, such as organics or a stump, could cause future maintenance issues. The only way to be certain of eliminating future settlement issues would be to totally remove the unsuitable fill and replace it with approved structural fill. A capillary break layer consisting of 4 inches of washed pea gravel and a heavy duty (minimum 10 mil), polyethylene plastic vapor barrier should be provided under any floor slabs where moisture intrusion is a concern. If the vapor barrier becomes compromised in any way during construction it should be replaced or an additional layer added. Penetrations through the vapor barrier should be wrapped and taped. Site Drainage All storm water runoff from impervious surfaces should be collected and piped into an approved storm water drainage system. Infiltration of storm water is not a suitable option for this site. All perimeter footing walls should be provided with a drain at the footing level. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, PVC pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The level of the perforations in the pipe should be set approximately at the bottom of the footing and the drains should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the buildings. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system, but should Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 10 • Gupta Residence Geological/Geotechnical Services Report 193xx 3rd Ave SW, Federal Way, Washington be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain that discharges into an approved storm water conveyance system. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to walls should be sloped downward away from the structure to achieve surface drainage. As stated above, if crushed rock trenches are used for foundation support, suitable drainage must be established out of the crushed rock. Erosion Protection The natural, on-site soils and fill soils contain a significant amount of fines and are considered to be moisture sensitive and subject to erosion from both sheet flow and channelized flow. Due to the gentle grades on the site the erosion hazard can be handled with standard construction practices. An approved erosion control plan should be provided and implemented. The plan should include, at a minimum, placement of silt fences along the lower reaches of the property and along the entire stream channel where excavation will occur. The silt fences should be placed as per local municipal specifications and properly maintained. Soil stockpiles should be covered with plastic during periods of inclement weather. Areas stripped of vegetation during construction should be replanted, or otherwise protected, as soon as possible. The construction entrance should be rocked to minimize off-site soil transport. SUMMARY Based on our site reconnaissance and subsurface explorations the site appears to be suitable for the proposed development provided the recommendations presented herein are properly implemented. Unsuitable fill soils on the site require mitigation in order to provide suitable support for the new residence. We recommend that we be retained to review those portions of the plans and specifications that pertain to grading or foundation installations to determine that they are consistent with the recommendations of this report. Construction monitoring and consultation services should also be provided to verify that subsurface conditions are as expected. Should conditions be revealed during construction that differs from the anticipated subsurface profile, we will evaluate those conditions and provide alternative recommendations where appropriate. Field construction monitoring and observation services should be considered an extension of this initial geotechnical evaluation, and are essential to the determination of compliance with the project drawings and specifications. Such activities would include site clearing and grading, subsurface drainage, pile/pier or structural trench installation, foundations and fill placement and compaction. Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12th Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 11 Gupta Residence Geological/Geotechnical Services Report 193xx 3rd Ave SW, Federal Way, Washington Our findings and recommendations provided in this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted principles of engineering geology and geotechnical engineering as practiced in the Puget Sound area at the time this report was submitted. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. Sincerely, 1. 4s' oTWAsly41, 'r ow,syl' o �, a ���r. ,• 16271 4.° . „41.ti, . .,„*:1, \ y , 4 its �)c \'\ loss .« S/ �' ed Geo ai I Gary A. Flowers Gary A. Flowers, P.G., P.E.G. Robert M. Pride, P.E. Engineering Geologist Geotechnical Engineer Attachments: Appendix A—Exploration Boring Log Gary A. Flowers,PLLC. 19532 12`h Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 12 • EP-5 ■ ■ EP-4 EP-3 ■ EP-1 ■ ■ EP-2 EP-6 ■ -, - i • bh`3 ro LEGEND AN EP-1 ■ Approximate location of exploration pit NOT TO SCALE REFERENCE: FRANCHINI DESIGN GROUP,6/21/06 SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN FIGURE 1 GARY A. FLOWERS, PLLC GUPTA RESIDENCE DATE 7/06 293XX 3RD AVENUE S FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON PROJECT NO. GF06046 • e ed g ..�. 11111 t i r A a i,j-r.:01'_,,-',1'-;''....:.;4, t. c -' < ti ^tips <� A... •+�•' ;',.+'C* ^ i k l `IA't r . 1 �„+ M t • -c 1t V.• I 17'h_‘1, y �t { lt . „YSs } • P; 3' 3s u� r g t r ti % y :� i 5 7 F f t o�' j�ir . • 1 •- t . L 1 = • • 4 h^ I i n .r . \ it ;� ! L � . y'sr 4R . .. _..I i 1 t 't .. • Ift tit , 4 ��11ito i "4 r 1 ' it Y FILE ` CITY OF CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 (253)835-7000 www.cityoffederal way.corn August 16,2006 Mackey Enterprises, LLC PO Box 65198 University Place,WA 98464 RE: File#06-103491-00-UP; GUPTA Dear Mr.Mackey: On August 15,2006,the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services received your resubmittal consisting of letters of availability for sewer and water service. Complete Application Pursuant to FWCC,your application is deemed complete as of August 16,2006,based on the submittal requirements for State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)and Process IV Project approval.A 120-day time-line for reviewing the project has started as of this date.The City has 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. As you are aware,the 120-day time-line may be stopped if the City determines that additional information is needed to meet the requirements of the FWCC. Having met the submittal requirements,pursuant to the FWCC, a Notice of Application will be published in the.Federal Way Mirror within 14 days, and other public notice will be given based on City procedures. Technical Review Planning Division has completed an initial review of your application. See review comments below. 1. Please revise the SEPA checklist per the enclosed mark-up. 2. As noted in Mr.Wells' previously forwarded review memo,because the site is made up of multiple legal lots,a'lot line elimination' is required.I have enclosed an application, informational handout, and fee information.The 'lot line elimination' is necessary prior to building permit approval,but is not necessary prior to approval of your Use Process IV application. 3. The criteria contained in Federal Way City Code(FWCC)22-1312(c)must be demonstrated to have been satisfied prior to Use Process IV approval.The criteria are not addressed in application submittal materials. Please submit a memo(preferably prepared by your stream consultant)that demonstrates how these criteria are met.If mitigation work such as plantings and removal of invasive species is proposed as a method to satisfy some portion of the criteria,provide a stream mitigation plan for review. 4. The proposed location of the structure on the south portion of the site places it in much closer proximity to the stream than location in the northeast corner of the site.Please explain why the structure can not be located further north,resulting in a lesser intrusion into the stream setback. Mr.Mackey August 16,2006 Page 2 5. The steep sloped portion of the stream bank adjacent to the north end of the proposed house is considered a geologically hazardous area.Pursuant to FWCC 22-1286(b), improvements within 25 feet of a geologically hazardous area are only permitted if no reasonable alternative exists and the improvements will not create an increased erosion, seismic, or slide hazard. Please provide a response(prepared by your geotechnical engineer)demonstrating the proposal is consistent with FWCC 22-1286(b). 6. Please show the location of the 100-foot stream setback on the site plan. Please respond and include a cover letter that addresses each of the above comments. Submit four copies of requested items. Submit the enclosed green resubmittal sheet with your response. Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached at 253-835-2643. Sincerely, rj ' is Isaac Conlen Senior Planner enc: Marked-up SEPA checklist Resubmittal form c: Sean Wells,Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer 06-103491 Doc.I.D.37666 • She...on & ' i''" Associates, Inc. 5031 University Way NE#204 • Seattle,WA 98105-4341 Ph 206-522-1214 • Fax 206- 522-3507 RECEIVED March 7, 2006 JU ., 1 7 2006 Steve Mackey P.O. Box 65198 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY University Place, WA 98464 BUILDING DEPT. RE: Stream Classification for Property Located Near 29310 3rd Avenue SW in Federal Way, Washington Dear Mr. Mackey: At your request, I visited the property located near 29310 3rd Avenue SW, Federal Way, Washington. The purpose of my field visit on March 6, 2006 was to assess the stream that runs adjacent to the west boundary of the property, determine its classification according to Federal Way City Code (FWCC), and flag the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). I reviewed the following documents and websites for information regarding the stream and its classification: • Federal Way City Code, Sections 22-1 and 22-1306; • StreamNet, which is a cooperative venture of the Pacific Northwest's fish and wildlife agencies and tribes, and is administered by the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission http://map.streamnet.orq ; • The Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Habitat prepared by the Washington Department of Fisheries. • Federal Way Sensitive Areas Map obtained from http://maps.citvoffederalwavcom. • King County interactive mapping V http://www.metrokc.gov/qis/mapportal/iMAP main.htm# ; Site Description: The property is located near 29310 3rd Avenue SW in Federal Way (see Figure 1). The property is comprised of tax parcel 119600-1465. This rectangular parcel is approximately 90 feet wide and 170 feet long and covers 15,300 ft2 (0.35 acre). The parcel is located on the west side of 3rd Avenue SW and south of SW 293rd Street approximately 0.15 miles from the Puget Sound shoreline of Poverty Bay. Vegetation on the property consists of a narrow strip of ornamental plantings on the shoulder of 3rd Avenue SW, a grass lawn area;and a thicket of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) along the western edge. On-Site Stream Characteristics: A small stream enters the property at the southwest corner(SW 295th Place) and flows northwest along the western boundary. This stream originates southeast of the property Wetland &Stream Analysis Permitting Restoration Design Environmental Education Mackey Pro F—Stream Classification March 7, 2006 Page 2 of 5 near 2nd Place SW and flows northwest to the Puget Sound shoreline. This stream is fed by groundwater seeps and flows year round, although there is evidence of stormwater runoff. The stream channel averages 3 feet wide and 2 inches deep with incised banks. Both the upstream section near SW 295th Place and the lower section near the house (29310 3rd Avenue SW) have low gradients, which causes sediment deposition (see attached photos). The channel in the middle section has a steep gradient as it cascades over boulders and causes bank erosion. I flagged the OHWM along both stream banks based on evidence of scouring, lack of vegetation, and abrupt changes in topography. The stream is bordered by red alder(Alnus rubra), Pacific willow(Salix lucida), bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), Himalayan blackberry, salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), and Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis). Adjacent property owners have topped most of these trees to enhance their views and have left the cuttings in the stream channel. Off-Site Stream Characteristics: I conducted a reconnaissance of the stream from SW 295th Place to where it continues offsite onto private property to the north and eventually flows into Puget Sound. The stream combines with two other streams approximately 100 feet downstream of the property but on the south side of SW 293rd Street. These two other stream channels originate from groundwater seeps near SW 297th Street. The combined stream enters the culvert under SW 293`d Street and flows through a wooded ravine down toward the Puget Sound shoreline. Near the beach, the stream flows between two houses at 320— and 326—SW 292nd Street The stream flows through a culvert in a bulkhead but appears to be accessible to fish during high tides. Stream Rating and Buffer Width: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1 defines two categories of streams: major and minor. Major streams are defined as: "Major stream means any stream, and the tributaries to any stream, which contains or supports, or under normal circumstances contains or supports, resident or migratory fish. If there exists a natural permanent blockage on the stream course which precludes the upstream movement of anadromous salmonid fish, then that portion of the stream which is downstream of the natural permanent blockage shall be regulated as a major stream." Minor streams are defined as: "Minor stream means any stream that does not meet the definition of`major stream.'" FWCC Section 22-1306 (a) (1 and 2) requires a 100-foot setback for major streams and a 50-foot setback for minor streams. Under FWCC (22-1), the stream rating is primarily based on the determination of whether the stream contains or supports resident or migratory fish. The stream is not listed by StreamNet or the Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Habitat. The stream outlets directly to Puget Sound so it is not a tributary to another major stream. According to a resident of the house at 326—SW 292"d Street ' Mackey Pro —Stream Classification March 7, 2006 Page 3 of 5 there hasn't been any anadromous fish in the stream for 25 or more years and flow rates in the stream have declined since groundwater wells were placed in the drainage basin. The culvert underneath SW 293`d Street is possibly a man-made barrier to adult salmonid migration from Puget Sound to the property. However, there were no natural migration barriers between the beach and the property. Although, it is unlikely that migratory salmonids would use the section of stream adjacent to the property due to the shallow water depth, it is possible that resident fish are present. Regulatory Implications and Mitigation Recommendations: Based on the stream's characteristics, it meets the criteria of a Major Stream per FWCC. Major Streams require a 100-foot setback from the ordinary high water mark[FWCC 22- 1306 (a) (2)]. Housing development on this property within this 100-foot stream buffer will require a Process IV application and public meeting before the hearing examiner (FWCC Article VII). Encroachment on the buffer could be mitigated by enhancement of the remaining buffer on the property. This mitigation involves removing the Himalayan blackberry and planting native trees and shrubs that provide better buffer functions. Native trees such as red alder, bigleaf maple, black hawthorn (Crataegus douglasii), and bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata) could be planted at 10 feet on center. Native shrubs such as beaked hazelnut(Cory/us comuta), red-flowering currant(Ribes sanguineum), salmonberry, Indian plum, and snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus) could be planted at 5 feet on center. In addition, clearing blackberries on this steep slope may require erosion control methods such as spreading a layer of arborist mulch at least 8 inches deep and installing silt fences at the toe of slope. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. I can be reached at 206-522-1214 extension 13, or at douq@bogstomper.com. —Pocc, 7A4041.41A+-- Doug Gresham Senior Wetland Ecologist Enclosure Puget Sound / SW 292"a St N - ,v293`aSt. m m Q C w Strearr-+ ��; operty Cl.) c C Q N c \r!iace SW SW297mSt 1-). el 7--Z5-13.— C % ....,\...-..ii_z_s Scale -N.-) 1 N 1" = 700' Figure 1. Location map of property near 29310 3`d Avenue SW in Federal Way. 1.....7::1*. ..:I o • .....,tx �r as 1.a!'fi.I 1'. a 1I.: ' .a M4 ,', ".1 ,i; I , /t' tiJ it ( r s ' �+ ~ t2 1 6 i et '� a • t.,...,_:. ..,....,i,..,,,,,,.- .„f;i.0,:10.,,,4,.::„:,:;$„:„ ,, ,_,,i...:,8,.. :,..,..„,........,.. „,..t_,....:„.,..,-. . „,,„„;;....4:,.„..,,,,..._-„,,i.....,,,,,cce.,,,,,7 1,,,,x,.„,?_.,.. ..., ik. 1. .,. „ ...z .,r,r:-%''' ,,--..".:StA • � �,, r' `� st�'p� d �r Y ✓ a: m �4. 1 i 'II .,,,ir‘tiittA ' ^�t .#;,,'. � ' t- ;j" m,„'. y 1 1 . _ram p".�+l @t' .` 6 - c s ` 4,1. -fr i l x ar -j { ' F 4T4<' ,�y fir,.} 'A r l', \f ,/"�`-- � �.y`+ ..y.»k �' I c,. �4 ` {#, s3t 7 _'.yea. • • / Photo 1—Looking downstream at blackberry thicket on both banks. ti-. . , - A r. x -ii �&1,y., 4 f 4 �1 t, i• 4 " • ,„. i ,,,,,, M. 0 ! ttr >YM<i I .1 'y' fis 1 f 3 t` R fir.. if f ! y� 1 .k, 41, , j'E1S . •` g j g $ i- )F i .. S' f .t Ii . > e t, - fwr i..` r a *: f- • LL • s• ,# .. a ar' `,., — .d * ^` �:�1 Ti _ Photo 2—Looking upstream at alders that were topped for views. o 3 n 1 % 1 d 1 = ro 1 1°1 SO\ '' \ l) f`,11 \ , 1 II.'I \ '''\ \,13 `k 5 \ \\\1v, xx ‘0 \ \ -T) \ '',,, \ , .::.) Ni S t G f5' k \\ \\\ 2) 4 / coo/QY4'- S VI113 ra S-t-r 2.P4 of 0 M 1O V✓1 f i 5 9y) Th 6 6e<e i, pro i Wfy 1 rk FP d-araX (Aia i F LE CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC LAND USE HEARING GUPTA RESIDENCE File No: 06-103491-UP Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at approximately 2:00 p.m.or soon thereafter on Tuesday,June 5,2007,in the Federal Way City Council Chambers, 33325 8"'Avenue South, Federal Way,WA. Topic: The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence within a 100-foot major stream buffer. Project also includes mitigation work to remove invasive plant species and install native plant species. Location: Parcel#119600-1465,Federal Way,WA 98023 Applicant: Pramod Gupta 32632 20"'Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 253-661-2037 Owner: Pete Grogen 29310 3rd Avenue SW Federal Way,WA 98023 Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner, either by delivering these comments to the Department of Community Development Services prior to the hearing,or by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing; or by appearing in person, or through a representative, at the hearing and presenting public testimony.The Hearing Examiner will issue a decision on the application within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may request a reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner's decision. The application for the proposal is to be reviewed under applicable codes,regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours(Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.)in the Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8d'Avenue South,PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718. A staff report will be available for review one week prior to the hearing. Any questions regarding this proposal should be directed to David Lee,Associate Planner, at 253-835- 2622. Doc.1.D.40945 Map Date:September,2006 City of Federal Way 441ki 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way,WA 98063' This map is intended for use as CITY OF11I1 a graphical representation ONLY. Federal way The City of Federal Way makes no warrenty as to Its accuracy. Gupta Single Family . SW 292ND ST. SW 292ND ST. g r I S.W.293RD ST. S.W.293RD ST. - " - SITE \ , / / ,; FEW;3 J r_ .y 1 us Q N _ r_.— \----N ._.,-, V 0 . I 1 \ \ \ I I / _ , r S.W. 297TH ST. / *rX I- . N 200 0 200 400 600 800 Feet SITE ADDRESS: ....• 293rd block and 3rd Ave. SW. Conditions Of Approval: G1. The stream buffer boundaries established by the final site plan and buffer mitigation/ enhancement plan shall be reflected on all applicable construction drawings and permits. The split rail fence shall be constructed at the location identified on the site plan. 2. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy the applicant shall complete all elements of the proposed mitigation and file with the city a three-year bond for A. monitoring/maintenance period for buffer enhancements. 3. The development activity is to take place no closer than 23 feet from the stream's ordinary high water mark(OHWM)as demarcated by the site plan stamped received on May 8, 2007. 4. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the single-family residence,the applicant shall record with the King County Recorders Office,the site plan and conditions approved by the Hearing Examiner under this application,and a separate document officially denoting the presence of critical areas on the site. . 1. General Intro: a. Good afternoon... b. Name,position c. Assignment of project 06-103491-00-UP aka The Gupta Residence 2. Exhibit: a. Before I begin, I'd like to... 1. Enter staff report &power point presentation as an exhibit. 3. Intro of Project: a. Show Site Plan b. The applicant, Mr. Pramod Gupta, requests an intrusion into a 100' major stream setback by up to 77' to facilitate the development of a new 3,130 square foot home with associated site improvements. The undeveloped property has a major stream which runs through the property; entering at the southwest corner from a culvert and flows northwest along the western Cka l t S l'k boundary until it reaches another culvert. Currently, the lot is sparsely vegetated with pockets of blackberry and is primarily covered by grassy areas east of the stream that have been maintained by mowing and planted with ornamental plants. The vacant subject site is almost entirely encumbered by the 100' major stream buffer. Approximately 336square feet of the most northeasterly portion of the site is outside the stream buffer. The specific siting of the proposed home was chosen due to geological constraints and sound engineering practices that would minimize the intrusion into the stream buffer. The granting of the variance will allow for an opportunity to improve the current stream buffer through mitigative plantings and selective weeding of invasive species such as Himalayan blackberry(SHOW Mitigation Planting). c. Project is located on parcel# 119600-1464, Federal Way, WA 98014 (SHOW VICINITY) 4. Intrusion Criteria: a. Intrusion INTRO: After this public hearing and consideration of the matter, the Hearing Examiner will issue a decision on the application and may approve the application with or without conditions, or issue a denial based on the stream buffer intrusion criteria's of Federal Way City Code Sec. 22-1312(c). As to those criterias, these are the city's responses. b. In regards to adversely affecting water quality as outlined in FWCC Sec.22-1312(c) criteria 1: 1. This criterion has been met. The applicant's proposal includes the construction of a new dispersion trench directly north of the proposed structure. Surface waters are to be captured by a new catch basin to the southeast of the structure and released within the dispersion trench. The new vegetation to be planted as part of the mitigation near the dispersion trench will enhance existing • water quality. The applicant must also provide and implement a temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan for the project. c. Next Slide: In regards to adversely affecting existing quality of wildlife habitat with the stream and setback area in criteria 2: 1. This criterion has been met. The intrusion into the stream buffer will not affect the wildlife as the existing site is mainly composed of maintained grassy areas, ornamental plantings, and invasive species such as blackberries. The applicant has proposed to implement several mitigations to improve the quality of the stream wildlife habitat including the hand removal of invasive species and the planting of more thick native plants and trees which will provide an overall better habitat than the existing conditions. d. Next Slide: In regards to adversely affecting drainage or stormwater retention capabilities as outlined in decisional criteria#3: 1. This criterion has been met. As previously stated, the applicant's proposal includes the construction of a new dispersion trench directly north of the proposed structure. Surface waters are to be captured by a new catch basin to the southeast of the structure and released within the dispersion trench. e. Next Slide: In regards to creating unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards in criteria#4: 1. This criterion has been met. The applicant will be required to develop and implement a temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC)plan. Construction of the site in accordance with final storm drainage, grading, and erosion control plans, subject to City review and approval,will ensure no adverse impact to earth conditions. Furthermore, the City will recommend that a professional engineer monitor and administer the recommendations of the geotechnical report and also execute the Best Management Practices (BMP's) as recommended by the geotechnical report. f. Next Slide: In response to whether the project would be materially detrimental to any other property in the aregor to the City as a whole as referenced in criteria#5: 1. This criterion has been met. As previously stated, the applicant will be required to develop and implement a temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC)plan. Construction of the site in accordance with final storm drainage, grading, and erosion control plans, are subject to City review and approval, and will ensure the proposal will not result in detrimental impacts to any other property or the City as a whole. The proposal includes implementation of several mitigation elements within the buffer, r . which are intended to enhance the stream buffer areas. Flooding of downstream properties is not an anticipated effect of this proposal. There will be no loss of designated open spaces as a result of this project. g. Next Slide (Site plan slide): Finally, in regards decisional criteria#4: 1. The city finds that the criterion has been met and that the granting of this variance is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property. As depicted on the site plan, (show next 4.0.P slide) approximately 98 percent of the 15,300 square-foot site is 4 Y(p t,;,,within the 100-foot major stream setback. The site cannot be �S � - x'� developed with a home and associated improvements including a .`4,..' r .new driveway, and narro usable yard area, `` "` 1\ p f• „r;.4 i, without intrusion into the stream setback. New impervious ""' A��—ices,E1 y 0). ir� surfaces will comprise of 3,165 square feet which is only �,G 1 e-;Is 0A v Go approximately 35% of the developable area /IpiJt> 4I , had the site been devoid of the stream kt40 14 an stream setback a location of the home as depicted on the 6\1 a�'� site plan was specifically chosen due to environmental and ' " et enineerin f sibility/practicality. The storm drainage trench k� _ouras c`""S `to be placed at the furthest southern portion of the 0- - , 05' property as possible to allow for the proposed single-family t` home to be placed at the extreme north end of the property as `�`h possible; therefore, creating the lowest impact to the stream buffer as possible. However, after considering the value and safety of the structure being sited at the northern location and the impact on the neighboring property, the City has concurred with the concerns of the applicant's engineer Gary A. Flowers. Therefore,the City has determined that the home is sited in the most optimal location to allow for reasonable development of the subject property based upon physical characteristics of the project and sound engineering practices. The City is recommending that the proposed structure and human use areas be constricted to no closer than 23 feet of the stream's eastern ordinary high water mark. This area will be demarcated by a split rail fence as depicted by the site plan. 6. Conclusion (Show slide of conclusion & Recommendation) h. The City finds that the required decisional criteria of FWCC Sec.22- 1312(c) & Sec. 22-445(c)(1-5) are met as identified in Section 9 of this staff report and hereby recommends the approval of the 77' intrusion into the stream buffer with conditions. The following conditions are recommended in conjunction with approval of the project. (Next Slide) i. Thank you Mr. Hearing Examiner for your time and consideration, and I am now available to answer any questions. 4411‘1' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF �-- Federal Way WA 98063-9718 53-835-2609 Federa 1 Way 253 ww.c ty Fax ralway.com www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION ,..-----/ I, 1 2.r"'Is tc hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action 0 Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance 1l Notice of Public Hearing before the (DS) and Scoping Notice Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Hearing ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental 0 Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS 0 Shoreline Management Permit ❑ FWCC Interpretation 0 Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ Other was gjmailed 0 faxed 0 e-mailed and/or 0 posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2,u 1 8 , 2007. Project Name Go ki'L ZeS►0enct File Number(s) 06 )b3 9/ - UP Signature Q e Date 5-- g— K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/8/2007 4:34:00 PM 411114414‘ CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC LAND USE HEARING GUPTA RESIDENCE File No: 06-103491-UP Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at approximately 2:00 p.m.or soon thereafter on Tuesday,June 5,2007,in the Federal Way City Council Chambers, 33325 8th Avenue South,Federal Way,WA. Topic: The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence within a 100-foot major stream buffer.Project also includes mitigation work to remove invasive plant species and install native plant species. Location: Parcel#119600-1465,Federal Way,WA 98023 Applicant: Pramod Gupta 32632 20t Avenue SW Federal Way,WA 98023 253-661-2037 Owner: Pete Grogen 29310 314 Avenue SW Federal Way,WA 98023 Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner,either by delivering these comments to the Department of Community Development Services prior to the hearing, or by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing; or by appearing in person, or through a representative, at the hearing and presenting public testimony. The Hearing Examiner will issue a decision on the application within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may request a reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner's decision.The application for the proposal is to be reviewed under applicable codes,regulations,and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours(Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.)in the Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8`h Avenue South,PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718.A staff report will be available for review one week prior to the hearing. Any questions regarding this proposal should be directed to David Lee,Associate Planner, at 253-835- 2622. Doc.I .40945 Map Date:September,2006 City of Federal Way 44k . 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way,WA 98063 This map Is intended for use as. CITY QF a graphical representation ONLY. Federal Way The City of Federal Way makes no warrenty as to its accuracy. Gupta Single Family • SW 292ND ST. SW 292ND ST. oi S.W.293RD ST. S.W.293RD ST. - VI / / - SITE 2 Qtt II, ;C R. J Vc )-----jc,: \ _ \----/\ 1 1 \ \ \ IL S.W. 297TH ST. / rX r-- • 200 0 200 400 600 800 Feet SITE ADDRESS: 293rd block and 3rd Ave. SW. Map Date:July 7th.2006 • City of Federal Way City of 300 Ft Vicinity L . P.O.Gis tox9718 33325 8th Ave S. Federal Way Tax Lot 119600-1465 FederaBWay a.98063 www.cityoffederalway.com 119600 0309 119600 00:• 119600 4900 •.e i 0260 •,t t i 220 119600 0065 119600 0255 t 0250 19600 026 119600 ti t •,00 t 235 119600 0180 11::t t t 9600 00 5 119600 0125 1111 119600 tit• •,t t i 215 196 A 0225 1 9600 01 1 9600 0307 119600 0230 SW 292ND ST 1 1196000662 196000505 119600 0735 119600 0875 119600 0856 119600 0840 119600 0825 1196000663 119600 0670 Q 119600 0857 119600 0304 Q IN CO 5 119600 0905 .11111111F -01 SW 293RD ST 19600 0855 .11 a 119600 1622 E - - 119600 1350 4 196001. 0 % N II 119600 1623 a: 119600 1360 OD 119600 2945 .11 ill MI 119600 3150Ill 19600 3i25 119600 4064 119600 3950 119600 3940 119600 3930 119600 3920 119600 3905 119600 3780 119600 3760 119600 3740 119600 3903 119600 3902 119600 3900 119600 3800 119600 3810 71,, i1t Legend Subject Site 11.1 Tax Lots to Notify \ CITY Of King County Tax Lots N Federal Way 1111 300 Ft Notification Area 0 45 90 1iiiime= BFeet This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. , • W N N N IV N NJ N. j N. __,- . . . . . . -A I* C, (0 CO -.1 Cr) C) CA) N O to Oo rl C) to A Co.) N ) (0 C v 0) Ui A W N -L r H CT a Cr,. a C\ a ON a Cr, a a a a, a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ON a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 o O O O O O O O O O O 0 _O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 r W w Co..) '.,-, W '..., W ,-....... W N r-r .-. --. ,-. .-• .-. .-� O O 0 0 O O O N .0 LALALA ��, is A A A W W W W W W 'D Vr a. a ON a O1 J ON A W N O O A •D Go 00 00 J 00 J a a LA LA 00 O O O O VM CD00 O is .-- O LA O O O (ALA LA OtA.0 0 A 0 to ti, N 1 C ci, A O CID a 4 n = -o N T. -ri CO z `FA n C-) H Cd n 1 -o c/� Cl7 C7 --I t~rf n O z ta~ X O r C" ? .. p C., 0 C 1, a > Op r D - —i H 5 pd co X 4 ccnn tr n cA r m 4 O r' 4 m --33 D a DD " O rri x 2 m tri Z — O D m n c) x x 3 %0 z$ a ti m b Z Z H Z r Z a z D z Z -< �1 x -to O O rri oj K rn rt.] H�- tri d cc„ .b 0 r r to 7i 7y Z O z d a rn m D O Z Z Z - a d < n a r Y C7 tr1 Z n r Z rm-� 0 C7 m z 7 ti O : x -H-1 Y :7 r > 'd x t C ra-' Ntri x C7 r z rri a +1 n D '73 Cn r r� X X Z R° C) N a L. n; y K p R° R° z Z R.Y •+ d v H n d [x fll 70 d 4 r, n r R° H x H r a + n m a , x xJ rtd a r + < H -C z r r" n x � r N D z d rri 7ofn CCt oO d HD y a a D D aa) trrri i - D 0 m`'G O O 2 d 0 H T H tri rn m a "I r v. El::, 0 Cr- r -H3' v1) 0 Z a O H (n 0 a) t z a > o � 77 O Z 0 Sy + rri - `-' O. = n a ga 0 IN a t.n W W W N W W ,--• In W W 4. to W W W N N N N N Pa --IN tJ W W W- N D 7 O 0o O NJ '.0 N -� .-- CD N CDto 0 W N.) ---� ' CC VD VD VD CC A W N w N O -0 A. 'A 00 A 01 A to .0 a is W 00 -I --- W C' Co W W W W W W O J N a a a N C �• a\ LAEn CA N -�+ W W A V, A V cCn vG� cn �Cn n vc� o D w o �o cc� v�� v1 cn can - 3 (Q ymy G C C •W G _- G C J G W N N N W N * G G < ci' W (�jI O CEi; n N N N N N ' N N N N H N N N Z 4 Z ,ro 4 V) N N N N N /� g 1/40 ,0 C7 LO .o H .D .o .D x va d d d 0 0 '-3 1D .D va w d a r1 In V, to A A S" A W A W W W W N W W N W , Q Z Z H H H -o H H H H a a a D > a a a Z Z ;d a r � Q u) to x x x ' x x Y x 0 x 0 < C t7 b < < < < < < < C0 C7 d d Iv < 2 H > �-d -o hv 'v' "d ^t C cn Cl) b cn cn cn rn cn cn Cl) o v& cn c cn m N x r r r r r H H r < H H C C c H H H H JA. N rn cD d a n ..ri ~ri ~ti .n -n cn -n ~ri -1 ~si e -r1 -1i ni ~n i t H "r1 ,_.1 ni -n -n m O tri tri tri tri rn tr3 rr1 to rrl tr7 tri to tri m tri to tri. tri tri a to m to Cr, to rn < d= d d d d e7 Y d d d d d 0 d d d d d d d n d d d C7 d d p D tri rn to rri tri tr1 H rr1 tri tri tri < tri to tri tri tri rri tri tri tri O tri to tri CI tri rn x y.Y rt P tiJi 3,-' F r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r a r r r r r r rn or n Y D a D a a a D > D Y > a a a a a > a > > Y D > a > > Z o D .< '< '-< '< .0 '< -< .0 '-< r .0 -C .0 -C -C -< .0 'C .‹ •C `< "C -C rC' -C m o `< a 4t Aga > > > > > � > > > > nnaaaaaa > > > >> > a > D N 00 A 0 .0 VD VD VD V' .0 VD .O V C VD ,0 0 .0 '0 .0 \0 V0 't0 \O .0 VD .0 �' ..O 13 C.-) 00 0000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00. G 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 t11 CD CD CD O [O 0 CDO O o O O O O O O O O O O O O N N IV N N N N N N N D N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N O C.J '� W l..., W W W -L..) W ..W W W W W W W W W (A) CA) W G.) W tag W .D 00 O A a J NJ Abb. 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-97 18 Federal VVay 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 • www.citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: • ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter. ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the (DS) and Scoping Notice Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination Notice of Planning Commission Public of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Hearing ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ Other • was� 0 mailed 0 faxed 0 e-mailed and/or osted to or at each of the attached addresses on �/►'la` y ( , 2007. Project Name jp'("k- - ae_S1 File Number(s) C) • Signature / Date 6X0/2�7 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/2/2007 2:25:00 PM Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall—33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library—34200 1st Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library—848 South 320th Street QQ 4littek. CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC LAND USE HEARING GUPTA RESIDENCE File No: 06-103491-UP Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at approximately 2:00 p.m.or soon thereafter on Tuesday,June 5,2007,in the Federal Way City Council Chambers, 33325 8th Avenue South,Federal Way,WA. Topic: The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence within a 100-foot major stream buffer.Project also includes mitigation work to remove invasive plant species and install native plant species. Location: Parcel#119600-1465,Federal Way,WA 98023 Applicant: Pramod Gupta 32632 20th Avenue SW Federal Way,WA 98023 253-661-2037 Owner: Pete Grogen 29310 3rd Avenue SW Federal Way,WA 98023 Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner, either by delivering these comments to the Department of Community Development Services prior to the hearing,or by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing; or by appearing in person, or through a representative, at the hearing and presenting public testimony. The Hearing Examiner will issue a decision on the application within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may request a reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner's decision.The application for the proposal is to be reviewed under applicable codes,regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours(Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.)in the Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718.A staff report will be available for review one week prior to the hearing. Any questions regarding this proposal should be directed to David Lee,Associate Planner, at 253-835- 2622. Doc.I .40945 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AIL 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal ,, A /� 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 tl�/ y www.citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, an.\s rs. hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: Notice of Land Use Application/Action 0 Land Use Decision Letter El Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the (DS) and Scoping Notice Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Hearing El Notice of Mitigated Environmental 0 Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS 0 Shoreline Management Permit ❑ FWCC Interpretation 0 Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ Other was 0 mailed 0 faxed IRf e-mailed and/or 0 posted to or at each of the attached addresses on -L ) 2006. Project Name at 't'I \ 4.44) ?eside,.,c.e_ File Number(s) O(D-/b 3 Y 9 / Signature Date Q ig'--D 6 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/23/2006 8:42 AM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Gupta New Single-Family Residence Description: The applicant proposes construction of a new 3,130 square-foot single-family structure located within the setback area for a major stream. Applicant: Primod and Vina Gupta, 32632 20th Avenue SW,Federal Way Location: 293rd block of 3rd Avenue SW Staff Contact: David Lee,Associate Planner,253-835-2622 Date Application Received: July 17,2006 Date of Notice of Application: September 16,2006 Date Determined Complete: August 16,2006 Comment Due Date: October 2,2006 Permits Required by this Application: Process IV Approval pursuant to Federal Way City Code Chapter 22,Article VII(File#06-102454-UP),Environmental Review(File#06-102455-SE) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations and City Plans to be Used for Project Review and Consistency Known at This Time: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes,policies, and regulations, including Federal Way City Code(FWCC)Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; FWCC Chapter 19,"Planning and Development";FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning";Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP);King County Surface Water Design Manual;King County Road Standards; and International Building, Fire, and Mechanical Codes. The Process IV application is subject to Hearing Examiner review. The date of the hearing is yet to be determined.The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services(33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718,Federal Way,WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community Development Services by 5:00 p.m.on October 2,2006.Any interested person will be given the opportunity to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and to give comments orally at the hearing. Details of appeal procedures for the Process IV decision will be included with the written decision. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 16, 2006. 06-103491 - Doc.I.D.37672 , Map Date:September,2006 City of Federal Way 441/4. 33325 8th South Avenue So Federal Way, 98063 uth CITY OF This map is intended for use as a graphical representation ONLY. Federal Way The City of Federal Way makes no warrenty as to its accuracy. Gupta Single Family SW 292ND ST. SW 292ND ST. 3 0 S.W.293RD ST. S.W.293RD ST. " \ / / - SITE 0 Z , [ J us a � J • cl i \ \ \ 1 II / S.W.297TH ST. i r)\ r- N 200 0 200 400 600 800 Feet SITE ADDRESS: 293rd block and 3rd Ave. SW. Page 1 of 1 Tamara Fix - Legal Notice From: Tamara Fix To: admin@fedwaymirror.com Date: 9/14/2006 11:09 AM Subject: Legal Notice CC: dgrigg@soundpublishing.com Please publish the following legal notices (Crestview Hearing - 05-102533, T-Mobile Kitts DNS - 06-101587, and Gupta NOA - 06-103491) in Saturday's (Sept 16, 2006) issue. Please furnish affidavits of publication. Tamara Fix Administrative Assistant City of Federal Way PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 253-835-2602 f e c e e g of c e g e MACKEY ENTERPRISES LLC Dba. 4 e e L? bm go,re4 P.O. Box 65198 University Place, WA 98464 Ph. 253-606-2538 Fax 253-274-1801 11/20/06 Mr. David Lee Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 RE: File#06-103491-00-UP; GUPTA Dear Mr. Lee: I am writing this letter to specifically address each of the 6 criteria outlined in the FWCC for a Process IV method(c)other intrusions. 1. It will not adversely affect water quality. The mitigation plan prepared by JS Jones&Assoc. clearly states that the result of the development of this property and the installation of the mitigation plan will be an increase in water quality. 2. It will not adversely affect the existing quality of wildlife habitat within the stream or setback area. The mitigation plan prepared by JS Jones &Assoc. clearly states that the result of the development of this property and the installation of the mitigation plan will increase the habitat functions of the stream system. 3. It will not adversely affect drainage or storm water retention capabilities. In the letter dated 10/16/06 from Gary Flowers,the Geotechnical consultant,he states that site consists of impermeable soils. The site has a continuous slope with no ponding. This means that the site has no storm water detention. The development of this property will control the drainage and be a benefit to the stability of the site. 4. It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards. In the letter dated 10/16/06 from Gary Flowers, the Geotechnical consultant,he states that the site development"will effectively eliminate any landslide or seismic hazard"; he also states that proper storm water management"always has a net positive effect on the stability" RESUBMITTED NOV 2 1 2006 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. 5. It will not be materially detrimental to any other property nor the city as a whole, including the loss of significant open space. This project will not be detrimental in any way to the surrounding property or the city as a whole. This proposed use of this property leaves a significant amount of the property in an undeveloped, open, state, and is in keeping with the nature of the surrounding properties. 6. It is necessary for reasonable development of the property. The following points are included in the mitigation plan from JS Jones& Assoc. All but 265 square feet of the site are included in the sensitive area buffer. The property is not encumbered by other development restrictions. There is no way to have reasonable use of this property,i.e. building a home, without intruding into the buffer. Every effort has been made to make this intrusion a benefit to the property. Please let me know if there is any other material required to properly answer these criteria. I look forward to your reply. Sincerely, Steve Mackey RESUBMITTED NOV 2 1 2006 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 20, 2006 TO: Will Appleton, Development Services Manager MZ- Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, Federal Way Fire Department FROM: Isaac Conlen FOR DRC MTG. ON: August 3rd, 2006 - Internal FILE NUMBER(s) 06-103491-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS. : None PROJECT NAME: GUPTA PROJECT ADDRESS: NO SITE ADDRESS ZONING DISTRICT: RS 9.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: construction of a new 3, 130 SF single family residence on a vacant parcel. Project requires intrusion into a major stream setback. LAND USE PERMITS: Use Process IV, SEPA PROJECT CONTACT: MACKEY ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 65198 2536062538 (Work) - MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Site plan, SEPA checklist, Stream classification report, title report, Geotechnical report, TIR RESUBMITTED DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1.2��6 33325 8th Avenue South CITY OF NOV 2 Po Box 9718 Federal OF FEDERAL WaIWAYF253 www.cityoffederalway.com RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. "Please note:Additional or re visedplans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number ofcopies wit/be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. ** Project Number: (o - /t9 Project Name: 6cip7-7,- Project Address: g 3 Project Contact: .-r?ir/ / Phone:, S1--je'•-,,q5:76?"- RESUBMITTED ITEMS: #of Copies** Detailed Description of Item z/ Z,g w ,eG jets ' Uasji��1' • **Always submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application."* Resubmittal Requested by : �(Nfe n e'r� C*1 Letter Dated:_ / l..1C /4(v tq RESUB#.• Distribution Date: By: Dept/Div Name # Description Building Planning Lam- I etoce s . y (e ms PW Fire Other • Bulletin#129—August 8,2006 Page 1 of 1 k:\ Iandouts\Resubmittal Information RESUBMITTED DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`"Avenue South CITY MAY Y 8 2007 PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Wa. 'OF FEDERAL WAY 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 BUILDING DEPT. www.cityoffederalway.com RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. **Please note: Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. ** Project Number: 406 - _i eifL - 6 -___ _f Project Name: oj'/1 y l /28s-45 o Project Address: ,2993 3 1J&,,— Project Contact: Sr-'Y /0- 7 Phone: ..310'‘r,S'.S'C5) RESUBMITTED ITEMS: #of Copies" Detailed Description of Item &S` til•r7am �/ .0 ei#ex ' / 1cyr. o •,/,-/-/y, **Always submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application.** Resubmittal Requested by : 40 L Letter Dated: / / (S Member) . „�� �� t:C° ;. ^ t` d ue; ��$",. y u ' .,�a9, .^; 'i! :nT u.•s S.,Fv ..F,'F� "' _b' . A i'' ry ,A*,-.'3xD'st ,,- RESUB#: 0 Distribution Date: . -0 By: _ Dept/Div Name # Description Building Planning T f�V ID 14LL 2 PW Fire Other Bulletin#129—August 8,2006 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information J. S. Jones .11d Associates , ]1REr UBMITTED MAY 1 8 2007 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. TO: Steve Mackey DATE: 5/21/07 JOB: Gupta Propety RE: Revised Mitigation Plans ENCLOSED ARE/IS: COPIES DATED DESCRIPTION 5 5/21/07 Revised Mitigation Plans 5 5/21/07 Revised Bond Worksheet COMMENTS SIGNED: Lance Erickson 402 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 110 AUBURN, WASHINGTON 9 8 0 0 2 253-804-2645 / FAX 253-333-8584 FEDERAL.,WAY IRROR A SOUND PUBLISHING NEWSPAPER Affidavit of Publication Stuart Chernis,being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi-weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County,Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way L-1257 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 19th day of May, 2007 , and ending on the 19th day of May, 2007, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $97.58 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090 Subscribed to and sworn before me this 31st day of May, 2007. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way o11 l u i l 1111//1/4 .�`�`��`��'A. HEzz'''''�i (2LLj, C �� ,,P N tiiii „... , 0' PPUBLt` ogo: z F,a ,to •�'''b Op WA SH\````�� 41/11►nnn00 1414 S. 324th STREET, SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 • 253-925-5565 • f AX: 253-925-5750 City of Federal Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC LAND USE HEARING GUPTA RESIDENCE File No:06-103491-00-UP Notice is hereby given that the City of Feder- al Way Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at approximately 2:00 p.m. or soon thereafter on Tuesday, June 5, 2007,in the Federal Way City Council Cham- bers, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA. Topic:The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence within a 100-foot ma- jor stream buffer. Project also includes miti- gation work to remove invasive plant species and install native plant species. Location: Parcel #119600-1465, Federal Way,WA 98023 Applicant:Pramod Gupta 32632 20th Avenue SW Federal Way, W 98023 253-661-2037 Owner:Pete Grogen 29310 3rd Avenue SW Federal Way,WA 98023 Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner, either by delivering these comments to the Department of Corn- munity Development Services prior to the hearing, or by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing; or by ap- pearing in person, or through a representa- tive,at the hearing and presenting public tes- timony. The Hearing Examiner will issue a decision on the application within 10 working days after the close of the hearing.Only per- sons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may request a recon- sideration. of the li ationefor theExaminer's deci- proposal is to be Sion.The application reviewed under applicable codes, r ula- tions,and policies of the City of Federal The official file is available for reviewring Friday, 00 working hours (Monday through a.m.to 5:00 p.m.) in the Department of Com- munity Development Services, 33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. A staff report will be avail- able for review one week prior to the hearing. Any questions regarding this proposal should be directed to David Lee, Associate Planner,at 253-835-2622. FWM#-1257 Date of publication:05/19/2007 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL RE SUBMITTAL DATE: November 13, 2006 TO: Sean Wells, Development Services Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue Sanjeev Tandle, Parametrix Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utilities FROM: David Lee (i7 FILE NUMBER(s) : 06-103491-00-UP k./Z RELATED FILE NOS. : None ?IK \? k PROJECT NAME: GUPTA PROJECT ADDRESS: *NO SITE ADDRESS* ZONING DISTRICT: RS 9. 6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a new 3130 SF single family residence on a vacant parcel . PROJECT CONTACT: MACKEY ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 65198 2536062538 (Work) MATERIALS RESUBMITTED: SEPA Checklist (All) Wetland Mitigation Plan (SW) TIR Site Plan (SW) Site Plan (All) .-- /I £S61 11r. ,70-A E';',.,-001. lniliii tiu!Linii-)JIS ii Z.,.0 i- iNal a AA ..9Z•vO.Z.Z.Zi- N ..BS-ZZ.OZ:./.0. Iniu!od I*. ,..-..-' . o c4.) _ ....„., t si) roloutri)± if daIng g..:00r, ' „,.. „:,..1;;,:-.7.V-t;•:::''' 0: - - ..„..,„ :.,, - ,, ..-§,,o,,,," ------ • „,..,-, ..„,,..... (....) . ..- .F".! ,, „..• . : .. •,,,,,..4. 4 _, :-11.,,,,,,77.7 :It].. ,,, ,..,..p.•,-- tt.,::.,,,, _-,,,,, ,,,'.1., :„ : . '.., . . . ,.• „„,_ '. : '.i:','-',.4"!1/2r.;. '"'',;.. .,'•..ij. .,. ... . ... „.•'.••••'''' ' ,'„ii„.':,,,,,,,,,,;..;:i!,(, a. r.....:...:...,.:.-!......;::!,::.,,:,..4',.04,i,t ..„„,:::„:',1,,..,,,.,.. , !:.°440'F:,:.. :,,4 f;„,,:ii:.„,::,.,:-,•.- , 1144 iiW. , 4..e.4.'., ,,,,,....--, 44:-. • . -,,•M46 „ „ • 'I'.,,,,..',fii„;t:•r.' .,7,...1;:;.;;441.::teiliifTi.lil.,'d'',,e,,: . i e.:!!.t e,.,:—::,•iI,7 p, '.,plxi1— , — pic.7 1 4 vo .,• -,•.),5.',.471'5'.',i' .,,,'., .'•• ''''A',./i,." ' i '. ,,,.:,:(1:,,,,,,...,,,:,,,,,, .c:.,V; .,",,;?Ix,544.iiiiv"',:,,,-•-':'i'4: 0! .., ii,,..,1,W•,, • * /14" ..,....;;1144:;..-';.,,', '[• .,,,,r7.•'• '..1.,,,;;;:,:i..4f,,,I,.."1.•,:•,,,,..:„:'.',,, ,,-,:.;- .:;,,.';,..0,- „' .,!.„..,.- - :i .., -, v.,: •• rj..44.. ...:,.'.:„' . .,, -4,..:i.;: 144,:',...V14, ''.7' 'r.44'..,''..2/,44''',0,. ' •,..,' "' ':Ag„.',•:'..01:, te -' • „. .. I • ,„.0k. .,:::$i„„,. --.!,•:••!.,,- •:,•,';, : ,'„,;,•0',,,i:lrill-tir,•,,,,i,•;•.,„;,(.4„,,:;17,1'',„. ..!,,,,,,,,:. r!7,7*-4,,ilia :.;;.,,,I,,,,, , ,-,,,„*., . , .... - 4„,,,,A ''''!, '.'",:,''. :,,,,:,,,,•,:,,,',. , -. 1,.4..:,,„:t ti.4,,.,'::,--4,,,,,,,,,„-'''t,,,,'7 t';:,„. i:;,447174,Vf..,. '".''.',,.I'11,..'....."'er,4. .„.4 , ,f. 41410/e:":1''',,':. ,. :.:',','i' .;,,iiiiiiiii*i 44- .'.',"' ,.',i ,.i. ..;,!:,,,,:,i„:',,,v ,L!!.,.., 0:r74,,,i,'•:.`,,',''4V.0„ ''',.- f' ''fraX,:.1194.. ,,--,.,- Itt:1;.''',:,',4,,,''..:,.,t . ''.i'..''''i'..1 ' •:.,1:;t;':rel'g' ',,,t..,44.4::';', "'''N'.'.'f' '[.'''' (4,4,:•:!,,i,.14,i; 4.-*„,,.::,'- -11'7: ,, „• : • ,:!0...m.:1. ,, !'lli.ifit!!"!'. 1 IS CINZ,6,Z./A../Y$;',',:,--.„„::„-,„„;..,•. !,!. -,-„.--- ---7,--.---- f, . , .. !...]: :•!.: •'' ,,':,!'1.' ::' ',• P'.4th ' " -.-,.'' , ,''',,'7:E-,;7.,V4x.:,','.: ,-,'",:'''.i.,1'.,„4:§:54.7411Yrtril:'.,:',..;..,'.;:o°*.,;.•:','.. '"„;.,.'',','"',"' '.,,,' - '-,' _ Iiii''' '''' "::' •,..e'''•""'•• 6, ..,,N!,!,.v.'siti'' •,, '4:0.1:•,!!-,,, '!•••!!,,•i.:•:!•!:,' :"! ?!..---Ti:K.,!!4: :•!!,;., •, !,!.!!!-!„:•z!--:,.. .!Ai- ,V ,,,, „,.,;.:,,,,.",-,„‘4.,3,i,„7,-.,,,,pfr ,.. ,..•.,,, ,,p,;;I:, ,,,,,, , , . ..... .,,,.. .„,...q!'.:;.5 Ql! '',',.4. ''', • ""''', ''',.'.-"44' ,.7,'. ,,,,....,:,..kiff,".,r,-*,4,1t,",; ,. i.„ ........ .... . .,,«. :'"' '',;11.14:'.,:ii!, ,, :i4416,,,': .,.i.' ''. . ' ''''::'I''''''''""•.!'"r14.174.J'''''''' '!" ' 'r"'"';:''''''''''‘4'''''''''' ' . t''''''. ' '. ' •.'',,:';.:',::',:de...44,"..4',V,V,4,'IP.A.li.,;64.;14:=4.1'4';''';4'.1,0'''''''''''4''',i3;;;t'''':44'„4,w,Tr,„,,,g:- . -,,„,,,,r-''' , l'''''''''''''"'"'''''' '''''''. ''''4111V ' •- '' • ' '''' .! :'":::;:'..8.::'•::''t"';'',i0014:',' 7.„.',....f!''!'.:'''.''''''''''''irl... ",..',4-'4';'':i';`:1"'''''L,;1, ',;*.c;''';`:4„'.' ;'4:!. .';iikif;11.filiit?'.''',..;itiiiiill$,itl.:',;f;'.'1:'.',?4.0.,k';',::::!;,..49*"''',2):7:;;triliiii'444 f.''..*''. ' .i';.:C... ..',r!'''' '' '' ' 10, 4"-E'ir. '.,:i:'.'.1,.!!.' '!OA"1.14'..,....'" 4.",,b4,4,,,i41.)'-!,,,,,f:„,.:,.;:iii.,,,,,;.;:',1,,:,?:„.".;'.,:p4t!,.ag14,0W..;:..,.,.. , , ., ,...T,,.:....!,•• ,:i,:i'.i'•:',•,,,:',',1,,,,,r7N:,1],::,.!-,;',',i: ,;7',5;;,.i.;!';:';',t...,fs ;':,::: '•::',.• ., .. . . ., '''' i't.:;". 1,44.'4''. ' .. ;.,'' kSfAf$M0341,1V‘S.!'''''..,,::!:.:'li,''.ijAfdjii:'pt;: „:',G1/4ggiritgSPC' e.7;:•Ya;t4*4r4.i;gg:V.::?;'':'•-,;':,'', ,.'-'..::'''',, 1;;.:... '"'::E:,';:4!'':i''''E:''' .:„:;•,.::, ';':Ij:!:,?:',:'•.:0!.......' ' :••-,.: i, „r,,, • •,.., ,',... d,* ,75C:, .L.,:,.".'„•!,.411.„,,,,,',.•,,t74:V.0'.e.'0..:;,',;,./,140.0:41:0!=! •?3:,:,:1:'0',.f,',!!:11,5110;f4j5r4li',i'lk.iltkt.: ''!,; '::• : '• ' :. . :'' '.1,.',',r,'•.'"',''f,:':: ,':'•1]',''..'' .,,.:. .: ' pk, .S' '''''',L' ' ''''''.4'''' ''',.• •'::r '' ,'''*'''' ',. :..i't!‘''.1.:'.:Er"7::;'t:E,E.!.i.E.41iiiiIPP::E .E;E''.,E.E.EE:.::::!:E,I;Ei,:<•.;E:;::?E''''Et;,.,,E,EqfiE4,41katifiOiEk*E..,E;.....,EEE . , . .E. ., ..E.,E.:.....::E,E :.E,..EE, .'E E."EEE.E.,E.E EH.....).: E 'E •E: . , it::. 'EE f E E,E.. * .,,., i.].';''';,,,ro.i„,,,, -„„-;„-iiiipo,,/,,,,,,;,,I,•,'!?! ••••,•:,,:,,i,„:•,.,i:.,„..,-;.:•.•:•';!,,,•,•.!!.,.•:.,,.!,:,,,,9: 114:N47:,!„ic...:A:f4t,kiii,,, • ,. ,•., , . ,. . .,„„ ,:„.,,,,• •„.,„!!, ,,• . ! • ! , -ti•,: .7.,, ., ..: !.,, . .,,,..:.,..,;,,,,,,,..,,_:,.;,„4,4 .4„...4,..,,t,„i,...,,.:40e,4,„:.tt:!-::.,:-,,,,.. , :,.,-.4,,..,....:.,:„:::::,,.,..,,,.:-.,4„:„.,„:„: „„r-f,,,:.7::;:.:,.:,.,.:,. . .. .. -. .. . ,:::,,-;.:. .:, ..:..,,..,..,.,:-, , : 111, . . ..... :: :„.„..... :... :: .;,,,.. :„. . . , . Aft.....,..., CITY OF Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE GUPTA RESIDENCE File#06-103493-00-SE; Related File#06-103491-00-UP Description of Proposal: The applicant proposes the construction of a new single-family residence with associated site work on a vacant lot. Applicant proposes to develop the lot within steep slope and stream buffer(both on site) setbacks. Proponent: Pramod Gupta, 32632 20`I Avenue SW,Federal Way,WA 98023 Location: 293XX 3TdAvenue SW, Federal Way, WA 98023/Parcel #119600-1465 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Contact: David Lee, Associate Planner, 253-835-2622 The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist,Federal Way Comprehensive Plan,Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, and other municipal policies,plans,rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2).The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by January 10,2007.You may appeal this determination to Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services, at the City of Federal Way(33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718,Federal Way,WA 98063-9718)no later than 5:00 p.m. on January 24,2007.The appeal must be in the form of a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Kathy McClung Position/Title: Director of Community Development Services Address: 33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Date Issued: December 27, 2006 Signature: Doc.ID.39155 Map Date:September,2006 City of Federal Way iill. • • . . 33325 8th Avenue South : : : :: : e del Wy80 CITY OF as. a graphical representation ONLY. Federal way The City of Federal Way makes no warrenty as to its accuracy. Gupta Single Family SW 292ND ST. SW 292ND ST. 1 S.W.293RD 8T. S.W.293RD 8T. vi - SITE / / • Z N. ks 0 3 VI* a 2 ; )______i i \ \ \ I 1 / .,,,_..„( L SW297TH ST. N 200 0 200 400 600 800 Feet SITE ADDRESS: 293rd block and 3rd Ave. SW. ._ ' ' 4 PY I • , *• -77_1 43 0 ,.. 0 rn . ru ..4 "ii:1 0 cc Z 3- "I Lli v.1 ...,.. _ *-I 1.0 a 0 F t hi 01--,i; flirt ct to 3. 0 —c, 1‘X a ff so IL ILI ki Z g h t CI-I CC vC.0 0.(0 zU1 01-1Q. ...D .. 4- cc )(.>. tu cy 4 :;-''',.. 1- 01- cc <4....,. OH HA Mu) ,..e , . 0 cC ILI ill ..., Z C.) • • Lu ,,.,- 3CC D NH r,, ct 2.1 000-02 IL ZfrID r:,-; 2 >- Lo Lu 0 al,- 2 z L.0 D j / 1.....1 4. 4:1 il* 1:1:1 iy! co c.) cn> l- Z W 2 a O co _1 w r7--- > C) W A CO )- 0 I- CD 2_-1 < D< 2 w >- 0 u_L.L.0,_., 0 LI-X g 0 0 F- ui LLI=' 0 W 0 C.)0- LL o gth °p e(� . . . . O O O O O O O O O O CO V N O O O O O1i1 ! a *""I w ZO O N O O O s0 I, �n N CO C 7 O� O O �D Q Ci M 7 ,- CO ,0 ,O O VI VI O ,0 v O N N N V �0 N 7 s. CO .01C 1 V O i N 01 T VD n M N h N O N n N p LL_� c N M N N n N M N O - co Cr W R N U hill a „ o 0 0 0 'O u N V «» w«n w U w v> U w in w w U .In » w U w us w w us w vi Aft c C c W m ^ O HVNT es ¢ ¢F- °a=vcN O F-OE__O O O A d�0_ t > r us 1---C) _ w U cN a LJ co .uO Lc in o m` awO 0 Oc o U A ° VI m ®>o�Y E ig `i ` gC Gl o ` L LL EC m rv' vy N OA R a C ea = ..EM M NU 7.Y Vc, NUQ N Ni. N. I > AE od H �' n H . co Q 10 N I L L > _.T = LL Y> = nu 2 2 2 2 O u] • .. u u - c = c J ut V c ;, cNy V U V U V a C w w m > 'p R g `w oo w w w w .E .0 N C •U 0 rcm V m 9- Q = ir illO u O 9 3 3 Qr .. O ^ O c o o y ; O O N ..0O ,.0 � a= n'aO N a0 0 O COVi0 , , „ `A In t1 w'o1w3 w ,9onu u o w w w Q a d V 3 . 0 Qovqay c.O . = CLI 3 a _ T.I. o a a N - o 73..... Z 15 smLL $ H_c el 26 o 0a Q Y3 yw m 0 • 71 I- w o oE E -I a _Z mm00y mm H m v C EE � ` A. m d _ _6 Na ...Q N 2 0Q Q ¢ C a 5C0O -y V ceF- y n m 8 Z o 0 Q U t Qa vo z Z -0 - LO (I N cy m WcccQ $ Q o W W ih N u+ owo ZH 1- vm H m o c o > m oOJ .2 c m mZ � J C m. ca 6- Qec AZ01N U U 0 y cW m Z m $ .w ma cc T., ~ iii i/ Q o Nw n. W , 68 v) 2 c WI y 8 - E. .f3Z iC Z H 1- 1- 1- C .. L y w o Z «m 'm mQmC a Za8 "' c8- " m 0, H o g o ea M E M E M M•y a 0- r a a a -I W LL U LL 0 C., QQ x V 30 a I- } 3 1P. cA g 11. cr. b W� w Z 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O aO V N o I1. i4 re O /w {_�iiF N M N N 1: N M N 7 �, N Lef ' •W/!J M ---!, el CC a3C' `D - en V N U - - - M U w M U - 1A 1- Vf U w - to Mf U 4.9 - if) C C OT p m C Ci = i. ; e ¢ - ¢ d I.--- Q =W VI O lI-- I--- I--- ~ -1a i O O O O O A vi "r _ _ gaqet, U C9 w u°�ia z h ? c' E m L o - dov v m -0 C c o a w °i E - c w _ C d V U w v m ® w C) `0 ` n N" u ® ® Z w N 22 C a. w 2, c ._ r 1n z b0 MI L d O 0 _ w= E c co ry v W G U V in N O N ^ M V1 LA LA - N V ('1 M N c 3 ccA Al M VL W C W 4 Ol - d a+ u d E y a+ ego N O o w co fa w �, u G > > > w Ed � w w w w V O a>i C. " 3 E.q� CO . < ce w` E y > o VD LA N LA o o ea E" 0 o N 2 CI w 0 4 W N Ol w w�' w w - a w w '��° o e F w 3 ro N N w d Ll• Q Cr- I- d U V u C U O ,c,' i E a m 0 D z J D D -U a. w w 3 — a_ _^ m .a D D 1 a' a a... - LIJ G - C 6LL � A 1ca Z w o o o U U'N .y m 'IS Ou C ? E o S a F `o 0 0 I, adula.a 7Ci E E H v c 0 £ "£ a a • Q VI o - c.e UN F.' N a '2 et c c ra ▪ c!) -oQ Zv z co N L I.- {/ O O W w z Q Hmo0 X _ _ g' 8 p a W i7 m WF- ,- H c c _ c"iU v ~ — co U o � o v v ai O en < c d c - 0, o E o_ a m m mICJ Z N 8 8 � 5 Ao Q .A > Q cI- fn to fn Q �' n a y N Z c $a .0 y c+Z idC z 1- 1- 1— ~ V1 to = - N N W cm c $ m ocVA g u vi a $-- O Wc, F aa Z ` _ 3 ` 'Ox d F a. a a H _, Li f 12 C7 LT. in O 1 2 i m _JE .z _, Em m W o �a Cras u'� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m Q N o 0 0 0 ya.<' r �1 Q u1 O O Vf o O O L+1 �0 .- 1� in N CO R V O: S O �n �0 L-� O _„.a) {M� Ili N p O pp N O O O v1 r6 0 O N 0 7 LLn n 'O O O C 0� 0 m�.II V v N Off+ T 0 n M N , N 0 I, 'D n u^i p •1C W�j CO N M N N 1: N N N R L M vI g.eo s,. Wy CC acp H Z' O.' O O O 0.0 v N w w w Ea w w U w w w v> U w w w w 0 w w w w w w w v> C C OC W p m '- y _T Fes- 1� I-- F- • N G m 1¢- • E 1 y 0 ^ ves t.. 6 U gn ° b0 aumia ^ • V7 = c ..E m o C ., w O v coT C awo _. S 41 'CIC0 U 0 w 7 a, ® w C 0.) ` i °' E °; w 0. y 2,2 ® ® z '++ YI y) r.. N N d C - L , L ro ,2 a c ,', o E= Q co ni c '+b�''Q O U cV •in IN O cry n N �n _o. 3 N 9E N n N M !, N 0 ^ d F T P V) >. C L 2C 7ro! a+ C d 2 E E 3 Y R IA d A 7 IA '• j A � v' a I J wU E A ic2 iv� v U U U U V a c > w w w w,0 3 o w. 9 u p E m U p y as W . E,,, CO °C a < GgpE y2 in 0 `" O 0 �o I� O C Q re a m O O N 0O • 3 r a G N O).- O O 0 0 .- CO N O m a O om O O NS0 N ww v r N Siw p� w 6www ww � a O rill w wa d dF U U VcU zEamo r CD a. D Wc D D D et d U w w 3 et.0 _ To i A 8 D ma0.) - WT. Z wr m -LL 'g O y 0�J c n a 1- 8 0 Z.; C m m 8 LA Z £ £ 8. 8. •V 0M y N N a v) o o c • 0 o 0 m cv 'a d M a ONt Z ce 1- � v) Z �( W `m m u Z m W m a To: w m ' F ,- x 1- S 5 O OV m H 'm m LU V S c S c Z N U U a m Z c T Q 'y a c Z 1O 4 > mm mmm _ J t C C A J O ._.. N C G a C W ~ (n fn y a m - !.a OC m c m Z m g1 t c c Z i C Z E. ~ rZQ- fZQ- F• VI cN mmm a y Z cN c c = cN N ? W .aco E o 0 V @ O a J J J Z a $ < C _ n W f- W a c ~ C ....C m g' c c C X a rT- a a a rT J W �' ii V ti in O �' U Q 2 11 E m 1 E 2 2 a I- Q Q 1 • f- t�141 �a~. o rriZ"I" Cr 00 oCI �a. OO. . . . 0 N O O 0 0 O r.O O N R V O� O 8 ON 8 O 44 ,- N O O N O O pp M p� O N M R N 0 O O V (1� O co M C 0p O ut O �O V O CO �0 N 7 �O N t, O 0 8,......,„, cooa N n CO N n N O N n u1 O C N M N N n N M N V to O ro N r 0 EJ4 o N � Q en a., y O O O o O . u N U w w w Vl U w w V «» to w ' U w«n w iA U w w if, w w w w M CO 9 - N W L N ^ OC ai p if, 0.. c Q Q Q .< ,� Q C a p Q _.,_ L0 an t? T To U o a: C_ 3 n) r d-mu 1p ..6 . E O ocom .0 C o- v a v c L Y .2 cO oU r in E. � ® yy .O t n ® c i iii ® 1-cv . ON EE L r u L W O U VN �1 1 �1 N v ry o.. N N ^ O ' a N on N e Wers T ^ N N 'r gF 2 bt > P ai y CV ma+ E= °' a _ 0. m o TO 7 c N "f n c w :.. x x x x c A w E.m „ V V V V V O -Ci R w www i NC < . a « c VmC Eny . Q = n o A OC y q o pp N � O > O �O ON n O� O c O pi y'� O O N �O d p d c E w O O Q - ^ O O� 0 v �O r O r O N .� r a 0 E. O na O^+ aA Vi p� Vf 6 Vi H9 p Vi fA ` 3. W r=o 3 CO n M an O d F a U U u c U o o z E v m w w i T D uZi E > j a V - O. Ta 3 0 - W -. U U. m c m 0 Z � CO u . ce— pp p U U L N N - 0 hO _H o o N Cci, 0:. m 8 to -8 Z _3. 5 � Q to o g • 0 o 0 d � � c O. ..0Q a 0rn t U �i S H L 0 c' E `o K W 0m OJ WO 4 WH ^ F-' U w y 2 a:, O M Q 5 'am F U C O R O Z NCUp V N mZv m c J A ia 1 8 G p ea m cO _ Qce m c Q — . — co� c o a, Z i C Z � N F o N yG DJ N 9 N Wo N O W N $OCasN N C y d 5 a A A- Al- a $ u $ Ww �' F We u d - z r OC . 2 O J W ti o V LT. i O U Q a cc a. o 2 E 2 Ef 2 0- H -. Q Q 3 o gu,-- c„, mV v . . . . 0 . O O O O O O O O oD R N O 0 O 0 0 .y+a; r W Z O O N O O O VD NLA N co V 7 T o O •D N O O N O O O N 6O N M O N LC; IL, O co; c O� d Q r1 7 CO ,.00O vt tin O �D C O N co �D N �D N I� p O • 0co O .- N as •D 1� M N n N O is. N p WO� C co N M N N N M N d CrW A N go M O O O O O -0 v oo U f w w w U w i U w w«A LA U w w w n U w «n w w ua 69 w w g' C C • _ R v 77 y lc P — Mt C 4J R O ed . EtC w Vf ;' O Fes- 1¢- F¢- F¢- ', ~ 20,11 F¢- s • d O O O O O ;g O — w � t o a> U °N A m C O W vN -CA j 0. E -C 0 d W O R .., -to 0C O L'C 7 _ V '-' co co E o 61 d O 10Jm ® �' u a E— w C C R u 19 w ® L O t C. w W N i N y y a C L L N L tQ Y a p y 0 E= v m N ? cDO Q U cV LA N O N ^ N N O N v V N m N ra M C N M ^ N E L N T H O C cu o d L C a! N a nma 3 in •• 1. N _ v' U c a U V U U • ni w w O^ E a�i o o w w w - 'L N O Q c 1,D, U m a Q = t9 nE U1c4 lC coLW OO > O A O.H n O C m O L . E . O OO NO.D G 0 ci d _ 04 cc a O Og> N N oo O z w wD °•1 U U c0 Evm0 3 0 co da LIJ D D 3 V LA w ro a -- eg R o 70 oe 8 ILI Is Z . m Q a o a 5 2^ d 3 N .y CO x o 0 0 a o d y E E - J a a 1— -7 o 0 MI• Vj C m H v _ _ Z $ a c ce > • E E < in J N v A m C m m — _ _ 0 N O Q H O O 0 a m .N...C -= 2 C C O. �O J m m = U cLi w C a Q Q ml O) T j I— En 4,2 Z ce .0 >( to m o Z c Z c L m Q `A H H i' 2 1••• x ~ c O O m F- m m V c o o c c u C M Q '2 3 m m g 16 R E.O > m m e z N A � � Z z = a y:y a R J m __ m h m = m z _ " m c Z ` C Z _� fn N 'w .c c u� LA a = H c W a a c m R I a z o. • $ 0 2 c - `� W w c c w a .c ~ c _� 5 a r x o- a a a ? 1- _, w t 1 H I U t LT co Q t l' 8 Q - E m E H m a H DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SER 33325 8th Avenue SO PO Box 97I 8 CITY OF f��'t�i.�D Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Way R U M 253-835-2607;Fax 253 5-2609 DEC t 006 www.citvoffederalway.com CITY OF FED MATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. "Please note:Additional or re visadplans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed farm. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number ofcopies wi//be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting ifyou are not sure about the number of copies required. " Project Number: L 1 0 3 ' r - Project Name: -/?%r/" ) iac, ' Project Address: c973}C7 cTev ' Project Contact C'%'/,/0i0� Phone:_ '- y6' 5f:3S" RESUBMITTED ITEMS: ;._.0 #of Copies'* ``•Detailed'Descrlptlon of Item ca.?' �. 6b-oleztt R aes- Always submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application." S Resubmittal Requested by: Pia '� S�fi,�/�r Dated: / / Mem r) RESUB#' Distribution Date; h_ By: Dept/Div Name # Description I Building Planning Dik,c 1 21 Leo !, 12.s .4e- #ice- y PW 436. wet I Fire Other Bulletin#129 -August 8,2006 Page 1 of 1 k:\ElandoutssResubmittal Information Garb Flower 206-367-6545 P.2 GARY A. FLOWERS, PLA,C GEOLOGICAL&GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING Technical Memorandum Date: December 5,2006 To: Mackey Enterprises,LLC Project Gupta Residence P.O.Box 65198 Name: 193xx 3"4 Ave SW University Place,WA 98464 Federal Way,Washington Attention:Steve Mackey File#06-103491-00-UP From: Gary Flowers,P.E.G. Project No: 06-046 Subject: Report Clarification The purpose of this technical memorandum is to provide clarification to a statement regarding drainage control contained within our July 6,2006 soils report for the site and also within our review comment letter dated October 16,2006. As stated in these documents"The site is not suitable for infiltration of storm water and no water should be allowed to flow over the top of the slope either during construction or once the house is occupied. Construction of a small berm at the top of the slope should be sufficient for this purpose". The intent of the above recommendation is to prevent concentrated water from flowing over the top of the slope. As such this sentence should read as follows: "The site is not suitable for infiltration of storm water and no concentrated water should be allowed to flow over the top of the slope either during construction or once the house is occupied." The use of a suitably designed and constructed spreader system west of the house should be sufficient to prevent concentrated water flow over the top of the slope. We also understand that there is a potential for allowing the storm water to be piped directly to the toe of the slope and into the adjacent creek. This system is the method of choice since it would eliminate all water from flowing over the top of the slope and we would support any recommendation allowing this system to be installed. Phone: 206-417-7640 19532 126 Avenue NE,Shoreline,WA 98155-1106 F:206-686-3834 RESUBMITTED DEC 15 2006 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. �� RESUBMITTED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8�AVENUE SOUTH•PO BOX 9718 CITY OF 7 2006 FEDERAL WAY,WA 98063-9718 Federal VVay OCT�VJ�v► 253-835-2607.FAX 253-835-2609 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY yrww.cityoffederalway.00m BUILDING DEPT. RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. **Please note:Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not.include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be retumedordiscarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure'about the number of copies required. ** Project Tracking Number: e2_‘_ - /61 .... 9 / - L Project Name: 6VP,-.49 Project Address: 67ck' r fGir Project Contact: /Y1i6Cer7 Phone: :5— i-�. ef" Resubmitted Items: #of Copies** Detailed Description of Item wv6r,z Gerrrir SO324 ( r6v z isr- WinzetiW,2 ,l in6Jax/ 9-4, Cam. ,ficinork'G 'ran ' of t/o'-►< Gerr0- (6-vi- rain 6Ajecy raw", 6619 77,E c1iT- p / i v /%' ' ** Submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application.** Resubmittal requestedby /' :�� are.i.e Letter Dated: //b Os Bulletin#129—August 24,2004 Page 1 of 1 k:'Handouts—Revised\Resubmittal Information , ` Oct 16 06 12:57p Gary Flower 206-367-6545 p,2 4 . Gary A.Flowers,PLLC Geological & Geotechnical Consulting 19532 126 Avenue NE Shoreline,WA 98155-1106 October 16,2006 Project No.06-046 Mackey Enterprises,LLC P.O.Box 65198 University Place,WA 98464 Attention: Mr.Steve Mackey Subject: Response to City of Federal Way Planning Division Technical Review Comments Proposed Gupta Residence,File#06-103491-00-UP 193xx 3rd Ave SW,Federal Way,Washington Dear Mr.Mackey: In their August 16, 2006 letter to you, the City of Federal Way Planning Division had several review comments regarding your application for development of the above noted residence. Item no. 5 of the review comments deals with the location of the residence within 25 feet of a geologically hazardous area as per FWCC 22-1286(b). The geologically hazardous area is the bank of the adjacent stream channel that crosses the southwestern portion of the site. As stated in our previous soils report dated July 5,2006,the western portion of the site is defined by a stream channel that trends in a southeast to northwest direction. The channel is about 6 feet deep at the south end and deepens to 14 to 16 feet towards the north. The steepest part of the stream channel occurs at the approximate midpoint of the property near the north end of the house. At this location the sidewall of the channel has an approximate 80 percent slope. The slope steepness reduces rapidly both to the north and south of the midpoint area. Exploration pits EP-1,EP-3 and EP-5 were all excavated along the top of the stream channel in the midpoint area. Our findings indicate that the steep channel has been oversteepened by past filling in this area unassociated with the current planned development. Beneath the fill materials the core of the slope is extremely competent glacial till sediments. Construction of the residence on the lot will require some portion of the house to be located within the 25 foot setback zone. As per our soils report for the site,the foundation loads for the residence will penetrate through the unsuitable fill soils and into the underlying dense to very dense, glacial till soils. This will effectively eliminate any landslide or seismic hazards from impacting the residence as a result of the nearby steep slope. Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 195321211'Avenue NE Shwd ne,Washington 93155-1106 206-417-7640 1 * Oct 16 06 12:57p Garb Flower 206-367-6545 p.3 Grua Residence GeologicaiGeotechnical Services Report 193xx 3"i Ave SW,Federal Way, Washington Proper storm water management for the site will reduce the amount of storm water runoff that currently penetrates into the soils and potentially emanates on the steep slope area. Reducing the amount of water that can impact a steep slope area always has a net positive effect on the stability of the existing slope. As recommended in our soils report, all storm water from impervious surfaces must be collected and tightlined into an approved storm water conveyance system. The site is not suitable for infiltration of storm water and no water should be allowed to flow over the top of the slope either during construction or once the house is occupied. Construction of a small benn at the top of the slope should be sufficient for this purpose. The steep area is heavily vegetated with bramble bushes. Construction of the residence will not require any grading of the steep slope area or its vegetative cover. Due'to the lack of steep slopes on the actual building site, standard erosion control practices will be sufficient for this development. Properly installed and maintained silt fences should be placed along the top of the stream channel and all lower areas of the site. No soil stockpiles should be placed closer than 15 feet to the top of the stream channel. All soil stockpiles should be covered with plastic sheeting during inclement weather. Disturbed areas should be protected from erosion as soon as possible after excavating. The construction entrance should be rocked to reduce the potential for sediment to leave the site. Summary The steep stream channel bank along the west side of the property was at least partially created through past grading operations not associated with this project. The existing fill sediments along the top of the stream channel are unsuitable for foundation support and are likely unstable under certain storm and seismic events. Construction of the residence on this lot will require some portion of the house to extend inside of the required 25' setback. Construction of the residence in accordance with our soils report effectively mitigates this hazard from potentially impacting the new house and will not create an increased erosion,seismic or slide hazard. Respectfully submitted, o _ lists wpirt% - ,Tko, ed fie " ` Goy A.Flowers 1 Gary A.Flowers,Y.U:; .E.G. Principal Engineering Geologist Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 126 Avenue NE Shoreline,Washington 96155-1106 206-417-7640 2 Critical Areas Mitigation Bond Quantity Worksheet Project Name:Tgupta Residence Date:10/9/06 Prepared by: J.S.Jones and Associates,Inc. Tax Parcel No.11960-1465: Project Description: Mitigation for Construction of Single-family Residence Location: 293XX 3rd Avenue SW,Federal Way,WA Applicant: Steve Mackey Phone: 253-606-2538 PLANT MATERIALS* Type Unit Price Unit Quantity Description Cost PLANTS:Container,1 gallon,medium soil $11.50 Each 40 $ 460.00 PLANTS:Container,2 gallon,medium soil $20.00 Each 130 $ 2,600.00 PLANTS:Seeding,by hand $0.50 SY 175 $ 87.50 •All costs include installation I TOTAL $ 3,147.50 INSTALLATION COSTS(LABOR,EQUIPMENT,&OVERHEAD) Type Unit Price Unit Cost Labor,general(construction) $40.00 HR 24 $ 960.00 I TOTAL $ 960.00 EROSION CONTROL ITEMS Unit Cost Unit Cost Fence,silt $1.60 LF 375 $ 600.00 Mulch,by hand,wood chips,2'deep $18.50 SY 3 $ 55.50 Topsoil,delivered and spread $35.73 CY 1.5 $ 53.60 'TOTAL $ 709.10 GENERAL ITEMS ITEMS d Unit Cost Unit Cost Fencing,split rail,3'high(2-rail) - $10.54 LF 205 $ 2,160.70 Signs,sensitive area boundary(inc.backing,post,install) $28.50 Each 5 $ 142.50 I TOTAL $ 2,303.20 OTHER (Construction Cost Subtotal) $ 7,119.80 Percentage of ITEMS Construction Cost Unit Cost Mobilization 10% , $ 711.98 Contingency 30% $ 2,135.94 'TOTAL $ 2,847.92 NOTE: Projects with multiple permit requirements may be required to have longer MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING monitoring and maintenance terms. This will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for development applications. Monitoring and maintance ranges may be assessed anywhere from 5 to 10 years. Maintenance,annual Larger than 1,000 sq.ft.but less than 5,000 sq.ft.of buffer mitigation $ 180.00 EACH 3(4hr @$45/hr) $ 540.00 Monitoring,annual Larger than 1,000 sq.ft.but less than 5,000-buffer mitigation only $ 720.00 EACH 3(8 hrs®90/hr) $ 2,160.00 Maintenance and Monitoring Inspection(City),annual $362.25 EACH 2(2.5 hrs 0$144.90/hr) $ 724.50 Maintenance and Monitoring Inspection(City),final $579.60 EACH 1 (4 hrs @$144.90/hr) $ 579.60 'TOTAL $ 4,004.10 g , Total $13,971.81 RESUBMITTED OCT 1 7 2006 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. . Critical Areas Mitigation Bond Quantity Worksheet Project Name:Tgupta Residence Date:10/9/06 Prepared by: J.S.Jones and Associates,Inc. Tax Parcel No.11960-1465: Project Description: Mitigation for Construction of Single-family Residence Location: 293XX 3rd Avenue SW,Federal Way,WA Applicant: Steve Mackey Phone: 253-606-2538 PLANT MATERIALS* Type Unit Price Unit Quantity Description Cost PLANTS:Container,1 gallon,medium soil $11.50 Each 40 $ 460.00 PLANTS:Container,2 gallon,medium soil $20.00 Each 130 $ 2,600.00 PLANTS:Seeding,by hand $0.50 SY 175 $ 87.50 •All costs include installation ITOTAL $ 3,147.50 INSTALLATION COSTS(LABOR,EQUIPMENT,&OVERHEAD) Type Unit Price Unit Cost Labor,general(construction) $40.00 HR 24 $ 960.00 I TOTAL $ 960.00 EROSION CONTROL ITEMS Unit Cost Unit Cost Fence,silt $1.60 LF 375 $ 600.00 Mulch,by hand,wood chips,2'deep $18.50 SY 3 $ 55.50 Topsoil,delivered and spread $35.73 CY 1.5 $ 53.60 I TOTAL $ 709.10 GENERAL ITEMS ITEMS Unit Cost Unit Cost Fencing,split rail,3'high(2-rail) $10.54 LF 205 $ 2,160.70 Signs,sensitive area boundary(inc.backing,post,install) $28.50 Each 5 $ 142.50 'TOTAL $ 2,303.20 OTHER (Construction Cost Subtotal) $ 7,119.80 Percentage of ITEMS Construction Cost Unit Cost • Mobilization 10% $ 711.98 Contingency 30% $ 2,135.94 ITOTAL $ 2,847.92 NOTE: Projects with multiple permit requirements may be required to have longer MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING monitoring and maintenance terms. This will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for development applications. Monitoring and maintance ranges may be assessed anywhere from 5 to 10 years. Maintenance,annual Larger than 1,000 sq.It.but less than 5,000 sq.R of buffer mitigation $ 180.00 EACH 3(4hr($45/hr) $ 540.00 Monitoring,annual Larger than 1,000 sq.fL but less than 5,000-buffer mitigation only $ 720.00 EACH 3(8 hrs i 90/hr) $ 2,160.00 Maintenance and Monitoring Inspection(City),annual $362.25 EACH 2(2.5 hrs®$1 44.90/hr) $ 724.50 Maintenance and Monitoring Inspection(City),final $579.60 EACH 1 (4 hrs 0$144.90/hr) $ 579.60 'TOTAL $ 4,004.10 Total $13,971.81 RESUBMITTED OCT 1 7 2006 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. e .fi RESUBMITTED Department of Community Development City of Federal Way O C T 1 7 2006 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way WA 98063-9718 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. Subject: Gupta Residence Parcel No. 119600-1464 File No. 100881 Dear Environmental Engineer The proposed work consists of the grading of one (1)home site,construction of a private driveway and installation of a City approved drainage system. The total site is 15,300 square feet.. Existing conditions: The site ground cover is lawn with sparse trees. The site slopes northwesterly at 9%.The proposed improvement drains toward an existing City of Federal Way stream. Description of design method: The design method used was the KCSWDM program which uses the KCRTS methodology. The post-developed site, pre-developed site and roof/driveway were analyzed. The results are attached. The geotehnical consultant Gary Flowers, PLLC has determined the soil will not infiltrate. A dispersion trench has been designed. Erosion and sedimentation construction impacts and mitigation: No erosion control or flooding of downstream properties will result. The site has an established and maintained lawn area. Down Stream Analysis: The dispersion trench will drain into the adjacent stream which crosses the southwest corner of the site. .There are no downstream flood or constraint problems within '/4 miles of the site. Please contact me if you have any questions. Gary E. Thompson P.E. 136TH St E. Tacoma, WA 98445 (253-441-0647) V•Ili% Ito 4 _• *Aso +°.r 6k At. . I Bran 10i1610 g 1 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:3rd-pre.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.031 4 2/09/01 2:00 0.074 1 100.00 0 .990 0.016 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.040 2 25.00 0.960 0.040 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.032 3 10.00 0 .900 0.007 8 3/24/04 19:00 0.031 4 5.00 0.800 0.017 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.029 5 3.00 0 .667 0.032 3 1/18/06 16:00 0.017 6 2.00 0.500 0.029 5 11/24/06 3:00 0.016 7 1.30 0.231 0.074 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.007 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.063 50.00 0 .980 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:3rd-post.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.043 4 2/09/01 2:00 0.094 1 100.00 0.990 0.028 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.052 2 25.00 0.960 0.052 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.044 3 10.00 0.900 0.023 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.043 4 5.00 0.800 0.030 6 10/28/04 16:00 0.041 5 3.00 0 .667 0.044 3 1/18/06 16:00 0.030 6 2.00 0.500 0.041 5 11/24/06 3:00 0.028 7 1.30 0.231 0.094 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.023 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks Discharge Volume from Time Series 3rd-pre.tsf between 10/01/00 00:00 and 10/30/00 23:59 3007. Cu-Ft or 0.069 Ac-Ft in 30.0 days Discharge Volume from Time Series 3rd-post.tsf between 10/01/00 00:00 and 10/30/00 23:59 3860. Cu-Ft or 0.089 Ac-Ft in 30.0 days Discharge Volume from Time Series roof.tsf between 06/01/06 06:00 and 07/30/06 23:59 154. Cu-Ft or 0.004 Ac-Ft in 59.8 days 2 pipe O.D. 1'-0 1'-0 loin end cap or plug flaw to second L dispersal trench f11.1100clean out tole from pipe if necessary oa 40�o 4"or6"perbraad pipe laidflat/level notched Q a° grade board �ti `a 2'x2"notches v, • • 9 type ICBwiso lid cater(Iccking) type I CB '° O.G. AiL g a 1 w/solid carer a influent pipe (max design 4°a fbws0.5GFS pertrench) � clean outwye from pipe • o4a fbwtoother PN b lane h ing C B's as necessary NTS pipe OD. I i8"O"C. I galvanized bolts 1'0 -0 — 1 �2" a^'x12"Z`; ! :.'•��-6 : r" r ,7 2"grade pressure 'i Cte aev N ` board notches 2" treaded grade ' { �" ° e % 4"o r 6"perforated board iy , R a 4 pipe laid flag 4 °a" NOTES: of 4"x 4'support post cell ' clean(s5%fines) 1.This trench shall be construa�d so *o 1�J�"- 14"washed rock as b prevent point discharge andkar ►a$ 4: •V erosion. 2.Trenches may be placed no closer filter fabric than 50 feet b one another.(100 feet "15% ram control/water quality abn9 fbwline) r tre8dmert in ruts!areas. 3.Trench and grade board must be level.Align to folbw contoursofsi . SECTION A A 4.Support past spacing as required by NTS soil conditions to ensure grade board remains level. Figure 3-4 Standard Dispersion Trench with Notched Grade Board October 2002 Volume Ill—Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control Design/BMPs 3-55 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Program for Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair of Construction Site BMP's The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance,inspection,and repair of BMPs BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR PRACTICES(BMPs) (all controls) PROGRAM SS-1 Scheduling • Inspect protective fencing and repair or replace as necessary ■ Repair or replace damaged vegetation per SS-1 working detail SS-2 Preservation of existing Bi-weekly • Repair damaged roots or vegetation compacted soils in the root zone SS-3 Hydraulic Mulch Bi-weekly • Maintain continuous mulch cover over are to be protected.Re-spray Prior to forecast storm hydraulic mulch as necessary. • As soon as weather and soil SS-5 Hyroseeding conditions permit,repair any slope After a rain even that causes runoff damage and re-spray damaged or from the construction site exposed areas. • Replace and dispose torn or SS-7 Straw Mulch At 24-hour intervals during extended missing sections of plastic covers. rain events Replace or supplement anchors as necessary to keep covers in place. SS-8 Plastic Covers&Erosion Blankets/Mats SS-9 Earth Dikes/Drainage Swales &Lined Ditches 4 The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance,inspection,and repair of BMPs BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR PRACTICES(BMPs) (all controls) PROGRAM SC-i Silt Fence Bi-weekly • Remove,dispose,and replace damaged, deteriorated,or Prior to forecast storm otherwise unsuitable BMPs ■ Repair any slope damage as soon SC-2 Desilting Basin After a rain even that cases runoff from as weather conditions permit. the construction site • Aerate soils,reseed,and mulch as needed to maintain a minimum of 6 inches of grass height. At 24-hour intervals during extended • Replace torn sandbagsas soon as SC-3 Sediment Trap rain events required ■ Replace torn sections of silt fences. Re-key bottom of fences as needed. SC-4 Check Dam • Remove retained sediments before they reach 1/3 of the barrier height or%2 of the sediment holding capacity.Vegetation may need to SC-5 Fiber Rolls be replanted after cleaning • Clean and dispose of accumulated sediment deposited in sediment traps around drainage inlets;re- secure silt fence as needed SC-6 Gravel Berm • Remove BMPs when no longer needed.As directed by the Engineer. Repair slopes/surfaces damaged by BMP removal SC-9 Straw Bale Barrier • Remove trash and debris from open ditches and dispose of properly • Remove woody vegetation that reduces free movements of water SC-10 Storm Drain Inlet Protection through ditches. Recontour and reseed as necessary • Install as needed SC-7 Street Sweeping and Daily when hauling • Inspect site access points daily Vacuuming • Sweep tracked sediment 5 The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance,inspection,and repair of BMPs BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR PRACTICES(BMPs) (all controls) PROGRAM WE-1 Wind Erosion Control Daily • Maintain water trucks and water distribution equipment in good order and fix leaks immediately TC-1 Stabilized Construction Weekly • Replace gravel as necessary Entrance/Exit • Remove excessive soil Prior to forecast stonn accumulation ■ Sweep surrounding areas After a rain event that causes runoff • Construct as needed from the construction site At 24-hour intervals during extended rain events Nlh •, " ,'�a ''^t,'.' 1• c-py NS-1 Water Conservation Practices Weekly • Inspect site during project execution for evidence of illicit discharges or illegal dumping • Observe site perimeter for evidence NS-3 Paving and Grinding of potential of illicitly discharged Operations or illegally dumped material which may enter the job site NS-5 Clear Water Diversion • Notify the Resident Engineer of any illicit discharges or illegal dumping incidents at the time of discovery NS-6 Illicit Connection/Illegal • Remove,dispose and replace Discharge Detection and damaged,deteriorated,or Reporting otherwise unsuitable BMPs • Remove vehicles and/or equipment NS-8 Vehicle and Equipment that leak Cleaning • Replace drip pans or absorbent materials as needed. Re-stock spill materials. NS-9 Vehicle and Equipment • Remove BMPs when no longer Fueling needed,as directed by the Engineer. Repair slopes/surfaces NS-10 Vehicle and Equipment damaged by BMP removal Maintenance 6 V The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance,inspection,and repair of BMPs BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR PRACTICES(BMPs) (all controls) PROGRAM WM-1 Material Delivery and Weekly • Keep storage areas clean,well Storage organized,and equipped with Prior to forecast storm ample clean-up supplies as appropriate for the materials stored WM-2 Material Use •After a rain event that causes runoff Repair or replace perimeter from the construction site controls,containment structures, covers and liners as needed to maintain proper function and WM-4 Spill Prevention and Control At 24-hour intervals during extended protection rain events • Properly remove and dispose accumulated rainwater from containment facilities WM-5 Solid Waste Management • Cover any stockpiles with appropriate mats or covers • Maintain waste fluid containers in Ieak proof condition. Repair or WM-6 Hazardous Waste replace dumpsters that leak Management • Provide timely service and removal to prevent dumpsters and sanitary facilities from overflowing WM-7 Contaminated Soil • Schedule Refuse Contractor to pick Management up waste containers weekly WM-8 Concrete Waste Management Weekly • Remove accumulated debris from concrete washouts. Replace lining and sandbags as necessary. 7 -- Oct 16 06 12:57p Garb Flower 20"-367-6545 p.2 Gary A.Flowers,PLLC Geological & Geotechnical Consulting 19532 12*Avenue NE Shoreline,WA 98155-1106 October 16,2006 RESUBMITTED Project No.06-046 Mackey Enterprises,LLC O C T T 7 2006 P.O.Box 65198 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY University Place,WA 98464 BUILDING DEPT. Attention: Mr.Steve Mackey Subject: Response to City of Federal Way Planning Division Technical Review Comments Proposed Gupta Residence,File#06-103491-00-UP 193xx 3rd Ave SW,Federal Way,Washington Dear Mr.Mackey: In their August 16, 2006 letter to you, the City of Federal Way Planning Division had several review comments regarding your application for development of the above noted residence. Item no. 5 of the review comments deals with the location of the residence within 25 feet of a geologically hazardous area as per FWCC 22-1286(b). The geologically hazardous area is the bank of the adjacent stream channel that crosses the southwestern portion of the site. As stated in our previous soils report dated July 5,2006,the western portion of the site is defined by a stream channel that trends in a southeast to northwest direction. The channel is about 6 feet deep at the south end and deepens to 14 to 16 feet towards the north. The steepest part of the stream channel occurs at the approximate midpoint of the property near the north end of the house. At this location the sidewall of the channel has an approximate 80 percent slope. The slope steepness reduces rapidly both to the north and south of the midpoint area Exploration pits EP 1,EP-3 and EP-5 were all excavated along the top of the stream channel in the midpoint area. Our findings indicate that the steep channel has been oversteepened by past filling in this area unassociated with the current planned development. Beneath the fill materials the core of the slope is extremely competent glacial till sediments. Construction of the residence on the lot will require some portion of the house to be located within the 25 foot setback zone. As per our soils report for the site,the foundation loads for the residence will penetrate through the unsuitable fill soils and into the underlying dense to very dense, glacial till soils. This will effectively eliminate any landslide or seismic hazards from impacting the residence as a result of the nearby steep slope. Gary A.Flowers, C. 19532 12*Avaroe NE Sbosdwe,Washington 981155I 06 206-417-7640 1 • Oct 16 06 12:57p Garb Flower 20 -367-6545 p.3 Carta Residence GeologicaUGeotechnical Services Report 193xr 3"d Ave SW,Federal Way, Washington Proper storm water management for the site will reduce the amount of storm water runoff that currently penetrates into the soils and potentially emanates on the steep slope area. Reducing the amount of water that can impact a steep slope area always has a net positive effect on the stability of the existing slope. As recommended in our soils report, all storm water from impervious surfaces must be collected and tightlined into an approved storm water conveyance system. The site is not suitable for infiltration of storm water and no water should be allowed to flow over the top of the slope either during construction or once the house is occupied. Construction of a small berm at the top of the slope should be sufficient for this purpose. The steep area is heavily vegetated with bramble bushes. Construction of the residence will not require any grading of the steep slope area or its vegetative cover. Due'to the lack of steep slopes on the actual building site, standard erosion control practices will be sufficient for this development. Properly installed and maintained silt fences should be placed along the top of the stream channel and all lower areas of the site. No soil stockpiles should be placed closer than 15 feet to the top of the stream channel. All soil stockpiles should be covered with plastic sheeting during inclement weather. Disturbed areas should be protected from erosion as soon as possible after excavating. The construction entrance should be rocked to reduce the potential for sediment to leave the site. Summary The steep stream channel bank along the west side of the property was at least partially created through past grading operations not associated with this project. The existing fill sediments along the top of the stream channel are unsuitable for foundation support and are likely unstable under certain storm and seismic events. Construction of the residence on this lot will require some portion of the house to extend inside of the required 25' setback. Construction of the residence in accordance with our soils report effectively mitigates this hazard from potentially impacting the new house and will not create an increased erosion,seismic or slide hazard. Respectfully submitted, a Wash! i‘izetTN . , I,`` _ 4 +i�i sue' ed ONo { Goy A.Flowers Gary A.Flowers,Y.ci:, �.G. Principal Engineering Geologist Gary A.Flowers,PLLC. 19532 126 Avenue NE SAordine,Washington 98155-1106 206-417-7640 2 MACKEY ENTERPRISES LLC Dba. .@me, eu.irOir4 Wo*es P.O. Box 65198 University Place, WA 98464 Ph. 253-606-2538 Fax 253-274-1801 RESUBMITTED October 16, 2006 City of Federal Way OCT 1 7 2006 AY 33325 8 Avenue South CITY OF FEDERAL W Federal Way, WA 98063 BUILDING DEPT. RE: File#06-103491-00-UP; Gupta Dear Mr. Lee: I hope you will find the attached documents a complete response to the letter dated 8-16- 06. The responses have been addressed by the individuals responsible for each distinct area of expertise and myself if that was appropriate. Item 1 I have revised the SEPA checklist per the recommendation is the city's response. Item 2 The lot line elimination will be submitted as soon as the Guptas take ownership of the property. Item 3 I am submitting the mitigation plan prepared by JS Jones and Assoc. Doug Gresham, who prepared the Stream Classification that was previously submitted, felt his letter addressed that the property would require a process IV application based on the fact that the 100 foot buffer encompassed the entire property. Item 4 I have included a letter explaining why the house is located in the position that it is on the South portion of the lot. Item 5 Gary Flowers has responded to this issue and his letter is attached. Item 6 Gary Thompson has prepared a new site plan for the TIR that shows the 100 foot stream setback and also addresses the issues regarding the TIR noted in the letter from Isaac Conlen dated August 8,2006. Please call me at 253-606-2538 if there are any discrepancies or omitted information that needs to be addressed. Sincerely, Steve Mackey MACKEY ENTERPRISES LLC. P.O. Box 65198 RESUBMITTED University Place, WA 98464 253-606-2538 O C T T 7 200G 8-19-06 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. Isaac Conlen Senior Planner City of Federal Way RE: File#06-103491-00-UP; Gupta Dear Mr. Conlen: This is the response to Item#4 in your letter of 8-16-06 regarding this project. The southern location on the site was chosen for several reasons. 1. The entire lot is within the 100 foot setback from the stream. Since any location will involve an intrusion into the setback, we felt that the other pertinent factors should be used to determine the house location. 2. The further north that the house is moved the greater the drop of the stream bank. In a sense even though the north location is farther from the stream it is no farther from the slope when using the H/3 setback from top of slope rule. 3. The Geotech specified that infiltration would not be a viable option. When I spoke with the city,the suggestion was to use a dispersion trench. By placing the house on the south(uphill)portion of the site the dispersion trench is as far as possible from the neighbor's property line. 4. While it is true that the house is positioned closer to the stream at the south side of the lot,this location is really farther away from the open habitat area adjacent to the northwest of the lot. 5. We believe that the south location of the house will also be the most pleasing presentation for the neighborhood. We welcome your comments and suggestions regarding the placement of the house on the lot. Sincerely, Steve Mackey DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AltLow. 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9 7 1 8 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal IVay www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, r+n v- x. hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: Eg Notice of Land Use Application/Action 0 Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance 0 Notice of Public Hearing before the (DS) and Scoping Notice Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Hearing ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental 0 Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS 0 Shoreline Management Permit ❑ FWCC Interpretation 0 Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ Other was i$mailed 0 faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or 0 posted to or at each of the attached addresses on — Se.,p+- s , 20 1 06. -- —� Project Name Cci 4- 1� P.�,� S Res ,c) t i F File Number(s) d 6-l0 y 9 / Signature Q,4, Date 9-/S -D 6 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/23/2006 8:42 AM CITY OF 011w Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Gupta New Single-Family Residence Description: The applicant proposes construction of a new 3,130 square-foot single-family structure located within the setback area for a major stream. Applicant: Primod and Vina Gupta, 32632 20th Avenue SW,Federal Way Location: 293`d block of 3rd Avenue SW Staff Contact: David Lee,Associate Planner, 253-835-2622 Date Application Received: July 17,2006 Date of Notice of Application: September 16, 2006 Date Determined Complete: August 16, 2006 Comment Due Date: October 2,2006 Permits Required by this Application: Process IV Approval pursuant to Federal Way City Code Chapter 22,Article VII(File#06-102454-UP), Environmental Review(File#06-102455-SE) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations and City Plans to be Used for Project Review and Consistency Known at This Time: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes,policies, and regulations,including Federal Way City Code(FWCC)Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection";FWCC Chapter 19,"Planning and Development";FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning";Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP);King County Surface Water Design Manual;King County Road Standards; and International Building, Fire, and Mechanical Codes. The Process IV application is subject to Hearing Examiner review.The date of the hearing is yet to be determined.The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718,Federal Way, WA 98063-9718).Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community Development Services by 5:00 p.m.on October 2,2006.Any interested person will be given the opportunity to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and to give comments orally at the hearing. Details of appeal procedures for the Process IV decision will be included with the written decision. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 16,2006. 06-103491 Doc.I.D.37672 Map Date:September,2006 City of Federal Way 44k33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way,WA 98063 CITY OF This map is intended for use as Federal �� a graphical representation ONLY. Y The City of Federal Way makes no warrenty as to its accuracy. Gupta Single Family SW 292ND ST. SW 292ND ST. d \ S.W.293RD ST. S.W.293RD ST. ca / / SI„el: Z N. a ..1 i rvs (\ (4 W F a� ta a (,_____i -... d 1 V 1 \ \ \ \. S.W.297TH ST. V *rX r-- N 200 0 200 400 600 800 Feet SITE ADDRESS: 293rd block and 3rd Ave. SW. F ILE ` CITY OF CITY HALL Fed e ra I Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 (253)835-7000 www.cityoffederaiway.corn August 8,2006 Mackey Enterprises, LLC PO Box 65198 University Place,WA 98464 RE: File#06-103491-00-UP; GUPTA Dear Mr. Mackey: On July 17,2006,the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services received your Use Process IV and State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)applications for construction of a new single- family structure located within the setback area for a major stream. Based on an evaluation of submitted materials,your Use Process IV application has been deemed incomplete as of today's date, August 8,2006. INCOMPLETE APPLICATION The application is considered incomplete until letters of sewer and water availability from Lakehaven Utility District are submitted. PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL COMMENTS Although the application is not considered complete, staff from the Development Services Division of Public Works has provided preliminary technical comments for your benefit. Only the items identified above under the heading `incomplete application', however,must be addressed in order to make the application complete at this time. LAKEHAYEN UTILITY DISTRICT See enclosed email from Lakehaven Utility District. Please submit the above-referenced letters of availability with the enclosed resubmittal form. After receipt of the requested information,we will notify you within 14 calendar days whether your application is complete. I can be reached at 253-835-2643 should you have any questions about this application. Sincerely; Isaac Conlen Senior Planner enc: Resubmittal Form Sean Wells Memos Lakehaven review email Lakehaven utility location map c: Sean Wells,Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Brian Asbury,Lakehaven Utility District 06-103491 Doc.ID.37560 Map Date:July 7th,2006 City of 300 Ft Vicinity GoBoiFederal xion 8'W.y Federal WayTax Lot 119600-1465 (206)-33325 35-70h Ave . Federal Way Wa.98063 (206)-635-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com 119600 0309 11960000;• 119600 4900 0, 260 119600 0255jls 0250 19600 026 119600 If i r•1,r r'1235 0 119600 0180 119600 006511•c r 9600 00 5 119600 0125 119600 1,6 r• •,r i I 196',r 0225 1 9600 01 1 9600 0307 119600 0230 SW 292ND ST 119600 0505 119600 0662 119600 0735 119600 0875 119600 0856 119600 0840 119600 0825 119600 0663 119600 0676 \ 19•Er: Q 119600 0857 119600 0304 0 IX CO 5 119600 0905 IIIIIIrsW 293RD ST 1196000855 .i a 119600 1622 119600 1350 196001, 0 I 119600 1623 0 119600 1360 Et 119600 2945 -44 19600 36r9 a 119600 3150 19600 3125 119600 4064 119600 3950 119600 3940 119600 3930 119600 3920 119600 3905 119600 3780 119600 3760 119600 3740 119600 3903 119600 3902 119600 3900 119600 3800 119600 3810 1196,11 Legend Subject Site - Tax Lots to Notify CITY OF King County Tax Lots N Federal Way 0 45 90 180 This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only. 300 Ft Notification Area Feet The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. . . ,.„.„:„.,::::,.. ..„... ........ ::..--... :II,',:I, ...-. . . • • - •••:• H::-. 11:k - •• ::•-•:„••,•:• ,•,..,•-:,--- -t - -:----'-:- ry •ts) ry--Nx - ",. -' -0' -' -, ,.,- , ..),, cry:zto -4 --p, oi -#H co ::N--" 6i iv N-,Y 1\3 19 i' Ci.- CO Oti -4 CP ( .1,) _..„ up 1pxxt-. -...i M. Cr' -,- w ..--, - . ..,,:i, :----.. -..-. - ..• c4..:.!: . .... , .,- . ,-.---- ....... .„:.,... . ... (n;;,)--- w-..3 , u..) - <•-) -..Pr I , cI:s,+ -:! 0'--.,: n o'-. -oi-1I1. o- .,o,.n.'.,-; .p., -.- ,un_,) , •'::..: 0._.. ....) •,:- : , .. L.,.0-.7 " - ' ‘ - ". - " - " ' . " - ' ', " " - . ''" ' " ' , _ .. _ _ _ . _ ..`. .1, -IVD ,.0 VD \0 3 `0 '° '3 VD v0 VD '.0 ,) '.0 VD '.0 VD AD VD C VD AO VD SO VD °s °NaN " ac a _ : §g 2 o c ai ° ° ° :°- °- C- ° ° ° ° ° -cspc. s1$ c ;HiSS: r ,g cQ . ci0 D © C p C C D 9 C F o c o o Q o c o o 1_ . - - 00CaEa N . 4 ' " ' ' . . i -tkj ii J . . o. w6 t- 1/40 '.0 , 0 : .. di , " a : i6 00 06 00 .: 00 CN ON V t P g I; - ^ ,. *, a\ .1 j, c , : t60 .e , ,cco, ,„ , . c. , 000 ri V , . ‘9 Qt : ,, ' . ,, . 4 .... __,,,„,,,,, • - , ..,.. ....... . ,•: :1, •::;*-i.w: n'-'!* *0 cil• '0 X et 4 l . (/).,,>,!, 4 i,--..0 to;-,-*, *0•'-'--r-,4,--- z -71" 0:I '9-1 z-• • r.):!;;:. 53.:;:t'• '1';',Ftt•E- 0 -i-o. 4 > PJ:,:t=i 0 5 9 ',--.,- ,• › 0;•,, „ 5 --:.p 0„ii. ,..• E-4•*•••> 0-.::&,•: › .:il t'.i.1..H -:a tc:19 -0 •••'•,:-:i•ct:f 4 i!li!•61'. n 0 Z:i-,-.1 P:' -.0 r :-.'-,-,--! PJ:---. •, •'-'.:.-! •( '-3---t7' 0..tO: v) riE:-!7),: 4 „:„rj 4'•:= .- rti•-••i'••,, •• 0 > ---• - z.-,-. --, . . .--3 .,. . ',,,,-pl; H..., ..: ,-< .,,.-3 y-.-- .-:'.-: 0 -:i. ,.., ,, ' :-,..tr1 z '• ..:..i. 4,:.•.,:P.0.,•:. tii -0 c, ,r7.,..,.,: rti;,:::fti.,,,.,,,,,,-, 4 0: r•,••••• ••• rri---•H > ..E › „-.:;:•,• z t,:i...,:„.„, to„,,,..„,,,,,. › , ,••,• ,• . Z .r‹.1 „•to !,,,-,•pol, wi...,--,-, -,.... ti1•• - z ... ... .;.,,,,,:-„,,,':1 trj,,,w- z z. ,......, ,.-.01- -.-.-:::. .--1,,',-; :- r-'--,z ..-,',.. . .-- z-: .- to Z-...-z •,.•,,, -- , .0„,_ ,:g,,,...... -- , ,___ 0 ,__, .,-, ..n... ...,,,, ..e x ---------!-- •••• n,',-;-,,, CA -0' ''''',./- 4 -tii ..tti - .tt -,,, „:•.cel-. .0-,..-)',,,.• -,:l:efi.,,,, „ , ../4--- Z Z .e.7) - e- ...0t7. ..c -°:----0--'°• ;.-0 Z Xrtl 0°-••..- , 01:00 00 ••.0P4, ' 3 0--0ee '01'M. > -lib tri -i'› • • '-'°!''' n 0:' ,_4„„›.' til'.-:--:0 oron':':::;•-,0 E-4 Z --:: ..',1!:,,,',"'.. ›.--,::::0- Z -,.4i. Z' . >.iit.t.-: :::,43: (". i-:---:•:M' >.C.:.• H ::--:,-:: .-3 --i7,47.!::: • ,,--,:,.0.: Z eV; (-1'J:,&o: '.":",:Ett: ""'-- t-' > ---,-:' . tr1-11,z) 1--1--','-Z.- Z---H--:--::: '-1-ii,a.. '-'k44','..,. 0!:!!,ipy --> H rrl -..-:!':::.--- > •::',,:'::!:0-, > •,t71, -::,-6.- N.:-. tz: ._,,__ ,- K i ----'-.-:, •• :;:147.)- ?,.-14*' til ----:',-::.:- '.::;.;- ' ". 4.:!:EH .:tt ---:', :,,,,,i,:;!'S '-'4::;.:'''''.'Zi '-~:,.P:1' RC. : . J -:00- .y'. M 6 ---- ----- - ›...:,-,.4,.. z ---• ..... ....1---,, i L,L,::,:,,..,. -:: : --.-•,: .L..LL. -•:- ------...,ri „,L,... .,,-,,.,.. .,,..L;l'iw..,-. ,-„-,•„.„*.,,.3 .,.--- . . . .., t,i „ t-iii,,,› ..i.--•-•••-• , :....,,,,.,... .. ,_, •,, ,.,„. tri . • i... . .,,4,,„. ,,cii.,,,,:i,,: . z . • H + • 0 c4:;: n..--,,.:••• -•!:,-,.f:'••. :•:- -, - -----,:i0R, • 1,, - -•.-,-,,,•• (--),,,i,,,:;,::, ---n .-,:,,.,:, z;,..---,.:-•,.- „.:. + -e-_, i 4 i;,;;i,i11,,..):,;,, n -• ,-,-•••: ••••":---- •-.7".„„ ..-:-...:,-„,:::. •.m,„ --..„-A:: >•,---- -< •-,'.:-. ..-• „-„-„iii:,:!•.i: •--i--: ,..rri:: :,..„..,•:•-. >:•,,otillg:k :,--.. : ..,......... :.....-„. 0.}: rii -,-..••,-,,-'-•,-4•• :',),,,):-:, ,.:::,,,„ ,,_,i .-. • :i...:: „„.,:..,,;: i..,4:..:. t_,,,„„,ect ''' --: :"--":-':".t-c '-'----. :""'::----: - '''+': < r- •••••::::::::::* ••,•:ipil •:••-••• x •-, 7,J N:•,.;,,••• itcf-'-,••-:::. •:':::,::i:-: -'•'0.:" --- • "------ -,...-,,,, tri .:: tri >i:- > •-•----••:::. ------•. -,,,;,--•• ,,,•••:•• r- (7. tTi„ ----: P ,.• -: -•' •--•,,,,1,1i:!, tti;•-•-• , -- ••5-4. !i-r. ,,,,,0-. ii.:• •,,,• iiii:•-i- -''''''' .. '• - 5 .-•-. il-i44-:- •,•7, --: .....-,- ii,;.11i10,;:,,,,,‘,,,. ::: ,„,...„... : - ,,,,•,,,,,,,,• ..,..„._..:... -,-, .:.-•• . ,--,_-,,,ii,,,, --,,,.--,.,---,-- ,::,-,-. • : • . -,, m -:::,--,E1-:.::: il•i›. ..... :••:„:•,.„, „.... ..:..:,..• ...„.„:::. ._: ,:".„:,„,,: .- .„..... , ---,,,-- - - - -------_- -: ::,•••(7) 4 „... „.„.... -„,„-,'„:,; ,li,,•,•:!:, . -,...„•::: •,,,,,,::„.. ... ,F•,.!,,,,•„,"•, „::::--• .„...,:•' •a- --,-.-- .,„,-„„:„---: • -.•:.:,,, ••:.:hi,,,,,,F 0 • ..„„„ •.:.•• „„,„ ,.!.•::,„..,,:ii ,,,'::,,,:lw,r-: •., •,,..,;-•••• :.!,:„.. .„E:::-,•!•,p0 ,-,.---, „:„.,:..- •:,,,,,:li ,•N•ml:,,,,, -=0- „ -:•.!!!!!!1,- ,:L ---"•i-• •••,..•:::•iil ••!!!:i•„„. Il!li•,31,.. - •?••••,t!,„,i•••.!::.:- -. • • •,:::,-,::',.,,. , -,,.:-i,,i;::"."'"'' i',A.',1M ;114",i',:-,' ---i!li • a 0 •• . ,...,,,,, -,.,.......,. Oii.!;:',.:':- ..•.--- :..,'•• 11.":' '-::ii!:-:::---! -:iii;,:i!ii ••••,••- ' 16,:i&' N';'E:--'::- :Eg'•4's ' .---- ' 0) a -I ,•,,,.„,,,,,,,,ao. ,,,6:':,',:;,-, . ..•' .- .., ,,..'..:, ,.---,,::::I,-'E -:-I,-,; .ililiiii.',;:.,', :::-.- l•-,' '10,:P,'-', HIEn-:!'-i!!:!--:. !!!!!!!!!!!!,:',1., '..::,',c:.:,-. .. ,, 0. ti) •gailor .',,:,,,,,,,, ..:::: ...,:,.. > .., -:.:4,,,,,..,,. .,,„,.---,-:-.::-,. >..----::,---- ••''': • - ,-..''':,->: ,::::-.---:il!:-;111,,'!,: ,>-::--,-..-'--i,41 ''. --- '',•• - 4 > . „' „.. :•:•, ii,10:,,•', t'-„„ri.iEi: , „:::„--1••• . .11,4: ,,,.-!.,_-:.,,,•-,11,-„--- - s--witit• ,..41!If! -1 ,.-z-,-(3 P c i•:•.g.- •,,..,:.:,,,,, g ,--„,-, -!!!-,...,L!,, ...1,91i!7. L-„!il,:!: p: .:..„.:.:, .•:. :. •-, abf,;,.(,,,,- ;!.....gr.g.,,- •• Z a gl) . .,.,.. - 0 ::::".:•iLill!II. ''.',f,:1'...,r,-? ,•. '-':' .---•:,.' -•.'.,':::.:".:': HEP-",li to•'':::::::-. :. --,i.... :-,1-,.::: 11!11- :. E1"!:-.::.-:- - o „,...„! ,E.' :::•:;'-- 0) CD ,•,,4'..4.4.'. , ...j.:.:,,'••.--. - ... -:.-.. .,'F„:':-Ii;•-;•:,. ;;q1li'V,i'.. ›. -- --': H...::::I'... !:„'-- .:' ,07'-' .,:',,.-,.-iii;:;;:!!--:- o.,: iiEiii-' JgV'•:"1 .-•-• :E--:-- •-•:::•.0' !--: ......._ f•-•,'" Z 3 / . .. ., , .,,...- ,,.... :::-:.,::•---:••.., :,:.;AT :•.:1.: H - :: -'- '01- •,:;';fr,1-7.i,,,,,,,,,:, tri :.,0 0, 00°°-° - m '0--•„::0; q:00,i 0,--3 :,,,.!i -:--:: -E-----..-.H :-,,!•:''.: ..- .-- -:'!!-;,.::•.; g,";4..': •-•"',.;..:TiF'-1:: 7J E-1.-1,F1:7 .':'•i . a' Z o 4,,-..i.•-!,;:m ,,•i„1101 rn rri:-.:;.--- ,,,,,,.,.• ,,•i,„!-:•• ,..,,.. tTI,,::,,,,,:,,-, .,„,:- :,,..::1;i,v' ,,,;!!!rT - ..!:•:ii,.-,E:iiii-•-.. e)-:,:-;:t:ii, - ,.„-- - ,..,. ill,,,!!, (t) a) •11,1',1,'-'''''':-:'-if,--,-:'-o- ' .':',:'',0,:t1 c4t--::::-: "":-''''''' ,•••;,,ii-i'-i'-- -..-:::'::il: '-3 klOt ::------,-- -r''"•::j'''''. '• !!i i:-.i-Zi;-:--,-,::,:A (4:1411'.,, ' :-. '.-,-,.4!:,,,, -1!1',ir.:)' z 3 ...:.,:.:.-:,:,, ',,,..'.,,:;:,;!,i o-; -.,:,.. ,;:-:.,:.'0,,I,.;- :'--!Ilii ,,,:g:,,,-,,,,... -i","',.:.:..:' ,-. ..'.-.::. EP -..,--:,1,,-..41 1111•0;1.,:..,:l .. ,:::.:,„::,:•: :,:.:-,-::, 0 (r, :::-:::::-:-,-::- ,H,,,,,,,,,,,-: zi,,,,,„i:ihii•i,. ,::::,:,.,.:,, --...,.-..1 :,.,1„:;„::.. n .; :,:--...--,•.•,. ,.,,,,,,,,,„,-, g0','. - ..i.,...,„- .-.,.,...",--.•::-.:,.-, ,,•,,O,,,,iR!,i;g,: t.. .,.,,.::.:„:. ;•,::.::::,.•, •:••.•:..,,,,,,,,..:,: :...••::.,,..-..-,:, •i.„,.,,:,,.,,,.,.„.,ii..,,:o...:„„,.,,.,,:,:, ,.. .,,•:.,:,,,,,,,,;,,•?,::.: ..ki:1;,•,.,;.:,...,,:.,,,,.,--.• .i,:.::...:.::,.:.!..,,,1,•:,::::: ' Cn 0 .Eo rn ----- :-::,H,•,•: •-:iii:i --..,-, ,,:,R,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,4:,„Y , , ...,,,,',..'• ..,,-...--' :--:-::-:--:- 0. = --:::"".: •--::-,.:. P.,d0,114,E --•-!':!--: l','. ‘, -...:...:- -:----:-,-,,,,,-,:- m 0. .-,..:: ::. iiiE::ii-:.--, ii1F41:' E-kZ::::[" !le'•'''-':::'' :;'- :-. til 1111;1:;-.•:: -<:-,:'.--:- --:.---'":- ,i°,111NO, Y.--'1.741"'-'.'::-- ' ' . :Flif.:;;'. :.-::-.-:1::::,.:, 0 3 0. E '..Pn:-.!!!:.i,--: -..:-,,.',..'.':.: --,-:, .:::.--:::,- ...,-:',..:: :,i:,::-,- libo:::ii,,1 ,!,!,--,E, ...:,--, :•.'. ::„,.:: :,:;.:"::::-.:.- '....-.- . ;Imi,,11,•,1 ,',:*,:::,,:11,:, :---:.:E,,:: -,--:-:-,,,-- ..,:::..::: :,,,:i:;!K!,,, .:,,:x,-.;:'.,:: -::•:.,:"'., ,:•,,,,-., - .-.,-,,,„ ..... -:,.:,„,E.,,,,„„1,,,c ,:,::.:,. :: ,.:„,,,,,,,,:!,,,.: :,-,--:::- .. 0 a) 3 * ',: ,''.;-;:. '---:::: ':•••::::!'!':' -; :„„:::- - ---- ,::•••:,..,, :...,;-.,Zikl, 1,,:,t,a .....) ,..,. ts..) -t.4. t..) t.04- t• > S. = -::::::41. Vi ,.W 144 144, 1,4 1,,eki:S•4,,, Is.).:;:.,:F , ,-,.. „ , , 4...,-,w ts.) .t„,:: t,s, 0 s.0 '- U' - '''': W 4;':4- " ts'It 4 4::- W:-::':el:: =t I) -ti-4') tCj-3i :. C' ''jt 4 t\). -.)- -- 'j°'!''''r':61 a--:-':---i'''a ,)53 .'L,',' „, .:,). ,, cs: 0, 0'. ,, 8 E. = .;i:".-,•la t°J°1 :g -I?=,)•':'-'811 t -L-l-- '.0 -.;:.:7,,,,; u`-EEE;ik) 00 ;::-. . '-'-.• : Ui /j-'! -t).':','4.)' t.)i-::E;:i . 4:: ul; LA eti,) v) 0. cil-:0-: 7) ni 3 csa :',,.,:•:i0s:!: u,-:,--4---, ci) •cii t:).) ci)4•4 c4:-:,,I191:- ci,11111!....c-0?1, ,::,--:•c--).- '' '''.)-- 0.:.-.--' 1/4c),,,:i.N:,-,-tt'3:: c:,,,441 .2.1"1,*.- : :, - - En' 0 '.-••':;,,,Ei :-*. •••* ,-):::,*.: i!',!4 1111 : -ili ••• 4•• _. L:.,.,-..,„Vt:- zix-,,,,:joz: !gZ. c/):ii.4. tv..b4; tQ t4i co . ,,-,,,,i- ,,, Nz.: t..):*)-- tv:AS,J; z :t,‘.)- Is•) ,"- b',,,e,' ti::,,,.,,,Ii.,:,,i,u,,!.3. 11,1111104. H ::,N3' -..:a 2 ..,,p,,, ,, (,) t•-)4N.) - , ----:::: -- -:,,vzi. ,,,,,c, v),,-4, - „ vD••••,84:}...- 3 VD::: • '4)ZAP rii) 000t,jii °U-4 U.) ,I..g g th ',--1.--- '4'.- '4'-:L - -Al', ,_, ,,:gl! ›.-:•, 11- , 0- >-,>: ›,:1,,,,,:,:,:::,- :,, >-1.,?.. <,„,:::. :,,,,:a 5, „6.,:.. , z -, :.:....,.. ,.. • . , •,„.., .„. CD -. --::::.:7 Z••,,,,,'-3 4 4 ri Ig.,, z..-:.!, ,r,,- zlil: .', x,::„ < 1010 to -0, <,:,---< <,iii,i.-i,',',,,,,ill <7.,,.--,< ----.. .-, T,, ,,. „:.::. C/) ce2 c4 M 0 - !. i >i'::"'4_4,*:- )-4'-°••,g4., :---.,A: '-t1'.,::.,:ctl -i:::':-.. 3. t-„'•---- - -3 -.73 --.-;-* -E,:-,,•;4',10,::,,,-!! '-Ti-i',-'.* -••i:,.-i-il- •• -.L,..L:-, _. 0 . .- i„„„--, (-)Li-,,•:;,,,.....-.„, .. -,'-,. .--• Alli ••.--..,-,•-,,,L,,, :L:.,....-•:.. L. . L, IE,--,••:. :,..;:,.-;:. ,,•,-,.,-•...- •.••„..--:• , . ..,,,,,,,,,... CD ---- --:-E::- '-'----:'-'''• CP tri -- .. , . ........ ...„.„„„. ... .. . .,. . ... . , ..„.„.„,,,, :,,.„,.....::... .......... _,.•••,''••••,•:;,: :--„,-,iii!; :,. " .., .... - - .,..•.,, .,„............... ........ .,,,,......, .,,„.......:. ............ . .... .... ...,...., .,„..,.......... --- .... .....- . .-......... ............ ....... ..,.. „ ............. ............ . , ,. .,•,,.;•,.:•,'di •••:' :-",':' '. .. .. ,...., .. .: ..........„.. --::-.--„,,,, 1.;:r:.:: . .:: ,.. •... ... ..-- ,...„...„ ,.........„.,..... .,...... ....L'i!::•,,:, - - :4E,;::..,•,.. . • • , .. ......,:,:-:. . . ,-,,,, . ..-.: -.:•,.:...'.: ,•':.., -:::::-. :......... .. -:.-- , ...•••• •,. .---- - --:-:. .-.:..,,,,,,... . ...., . ..::..-:::.:.- .„.: , :. . ,::.•. .„.„.....,.. „,,,,,:.„ -.,:„:::•:•:,, . -- ...,:i • :.:,..,...-.:. --- i--'-'- i-ri,';',HP.i.H.f.,-;',-."'.1', 1-ri:-°Li' (-1-'".'il '71 *il '71 -''"! '.1/ • 001*f 171 '1710 ' 361T-1 L10 UTI'':--t-- ..11.11 ):. :0°0 -> n'_.--: :- "t---•-•:11 '-'1 -,71,-- ,,,'Ti-Ai: tii:+,1fi• tri,trirz tri, tri Jill-j.fig: til---tr-1., > Ha ,-, j (.66 6 0 _•-•.:_.-:.:•,w. 0.-.-.M,!;. til-,:::!:tr.1 ti;i.„.ttg., ei ..->,,, t.. tv t, •.,u. ,__,..:tv tv .•---0... t::,:iioik ;1. : td •t73E n .t.t. tTi.tri Ttti: tt 73 ::"tri,r. tri:::-iitt- tri -tri. trl • • rt rrl .. 51 tli- 0 ,.. .. . •• : ----- ----i......- ., .b. .:...... 1-_ ... E. .-.-f.„.••,,--: ""F, 4- ;-----: .„. F - .1.,„ ... , '-:::,-1,-,,,,, tii,.:'•••17,..,,••:„. .•:,:.F• , -- -- :::,-,• •••••,, ,•,:- -,---• •••••- •.„ t--!, ,•••,!•"‘", --,--- __• , i,i,--,•• , --• t.:::::.„„„;,--•.•,•;4 ,,,,••,,,,:,,,, ,.....- t-..i.,,,,• t-4:•"'-••;,-,.- t"" cn ..,... c„rn ---,:,„, , •..••.,•„,-,-, ,...,..., ,-, ,..i•-.-,-..„,, ,,:•.-.t.t.:•••.•,•• t-,,,, ••,- t-:,-:-•.-:- ,, ...- -,-:.- .., ••., •• ,•;.:,',,,,g,,,* -,,,• ,,, .--- -:. - ., -.-•-•,.e, (-).:•-„,„ ,,••:,i!,..-:,,,•0. ,•-::.,-* •-,-. -- •,,,, .-.,, - ,..,,,,, ,,,,,,,„,„•,:,,,,,, ,:. ,•:. > › --,:::-P,._.,, r,tri,f--,-,":, ›. •,-: › * › ,,, ›,„„».›.•.. ,:,.,,,o-,,,-.. › -›- › ,:p. ›:... .:.. .: ,, , m ,.:„... ,.. .,,„ ,, ,.. ,, ,,. ,, .•:..:, ..,.„,., ,.,,,,,,,,,,, ,:•,:,, , •,<- , ..., .,:::: ,-, ••••<::, ›. ••,..,„ ,„..: .., .. ,„,*,. ...,,,•••!: --„::::•••, • * ,,, .. •.:.• -• -•„......:.., ..„ o--- --- ,, • -- ••,• ,-,, :---,),• -.•••, •• -::,,•,- › , ›,.,.:.,,,,,,,,,.:. ,>,„,..,„ , .> > > > > > --.4,Q '0--'•,•4 ,:.---, ,, ,>•-:-- ; › .•_7: › .›. ›:-.•.›. n > > » > :,,,:;,„).„,,,,,,,,:.,. :.F-0... . .:.. , -- co.::>.., ...--......,,-:.,. rri . .... ,....,. .:.: ,40 .0 .0 .0 -.0, .0 ,,,--..--.,0, .,...t, .0 .0 .0 .0 so, ' .. so so so .-o, 00 ..00. 00 ,.0.0... 00 --- -[,•'-sio-:. so so so so so . '.0 '.0 ,,,,,b6:: .00 00 00 00 00 00 - 00 00 00- ..,=, c, C c,.:-.0:. 0 c) 00 00 bc' 00 °t) 00-H 00 ''-'9° °°719.: 9 o O. 9 0 9:-; .9.. 9„9 ,.,:„ . IN t4 N).ts. „ 1-.1 ;----' -C>- c) C) c' c°: c) - - c':;.. 3.- F.)) •••-t -. > t.) t•-) ts-) t-.) " t-.),;T,:,,,•',W• s-,) t1 -- w w w.: w ts,> t.) I.): N.)---" " -:.• 1.;„'-,--::,-,- ,.) :0-4 w w t., ,--)• tk..)•• t-'0[0,,,,T,,,,,:,, ,.-•,-•;: -••.-!•, to ,w. w•• ;-), ,..) ,44 (--) • --,E,----.- ,,:•••- ,Q • ,.„.,.. ,•.,,. ... _ 0 .. :,, ,: -„,,,:.--- --- 00 _ . . -::„.-:•-•----0 tz .-„,,-,:, -„,-, .,,,,,,, , . -.-- : :•••••••, -I „,...... ,.,•••• .. ,. .• .. ...„„,,•••.•I.) . . ....., .... ..... CITY OF MEMORANDUM Federal Way Public Works Department DATE: July 27, 2006 TO: Isaac Conlen FROM: Sean Wells, SUBJECT: GUPTA - (06-103491-00-UP) *NO SITE ADDRESS* - PWDS Completeness and Tech Comments I have reviewed the plans date stamped July 17, 2006, and have determined the application complete for Public Works review. I have also reviewed the plans and have the following technical comments with the proposal,which must be completed prior to receiving land use approval from Public Works. The following items must be shown on the plans: 1. Show the underlying lots 17, 18, 19 on the site. 2. Show all easements pertaining to the site that are listed in the title report(8308150535,8309300065, 8704081015, 9311091177) 3. List the pervious and impervious surface areas. 4. The detail of the dispersion trench is illegible. The following information is required in the Preliminary Technical Information Report: 1. Provide the pre and post-developed site analyses. 2. Provide the dispersion trench design. 3. List the assumptions used in determining the peak flow frequencies(i.e.: areas,ground covers,etc.) Legal Description 1. The legal description shown in Schedule A of the Title Report differs significantly from the legal description shown on the Record of Survey 9505189005 and the deed 9507061436. The title report's legal description describes an area that is inconsistent with the assessor's map and the record of survey. Please verify with both the title company and the land surveyor and correct any discrepancies. Lot Line Elimination 1. A"Lot Line Elimination"will be required prior to issuing the building permit. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 20, 2006 TO: Will Appleton, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, Federal Way Fire Department FROM: Isaac Conlen FOR DRC MTG. ON: August 3rd, 2006 - Internal FILE NUMBER(s) : 06-103491-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS. : None PROJECT NAME: GUPTA PROJECT ADDRESS: NO SITE ADDRESS ZONING DISTRICT: RS 9 .6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: construction of a new 3, 130 SF single family residence on a vacant parcel. Project requires intrusion into a major stream setback. LAND USE PERMITS: Use Process IV, SEPA PROJECT CONTACT: MACKEY ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 65198 2536062538 (Work) MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Site plan, SEPA checklist, Stream classification report, title report, Geotechnical report, TIR A Department of Community Development City of Federal Way RECEIVED 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way WA 98063-9718 JUL 1 7 2006 Subject: Gupta Residence Parcel No. 119600-1464 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY File No. 100881 BUILDING DEPT. Dear Environmental Engineer The proposed work consists of the grading of one (1) home site, construction of a private driveway and installation of a City approved drainage system. The total site is 15,300 square feet.. Existing conditions: The site ground cover is lawn with sparse trees. The site slopes northwesterly at 9%.The proposed improvement drains toward an existing City of Federal Way stream. Description of design method: The design method used was the KCSWDM program which uses the KCRTS methodology. The post-developed site, pre-developed site and roof/driveway were analyzed. The results are attached. The soil consultant (Sheldon & Associates) has determined the soil will not infiltrate. A dispersion trench has been designed. Erosion and sedimentation construction impacts and mitigation: No erosion control or flooding of downstream properties will result. The site has an established and maintained lawn area. Down Stream Analysis: The dispersion trench will drain into the adjacent stream which crosses the southwest corner of the site. .There are no downstream flood or constraint problems within '/a miles of the site. Please contact me if you have any questions. Gary E. Thompson P.E. 14101 Golden Given Rd E. Tacoma,WA 98445 (253-531-6672) *,THp 27j3 v. a U� OPIIIM 111/16" 4e 1 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:3rd-pre.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.031 4 2/09/01 2:00 0.074 1 100.00 0.990 0.016 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.040 2 25.00 0.960 0.040 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.032 3 10.00 0.900 0.007 8 3/24/04 19:00 0.031 4 5.00 0.800 0.017 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.029 5 3 .00 0.667 0.032 3 1/18/06 16:00 0.017 6 2.00 0.500 0.029 5 11/24/06 3:00 0.016 7 1.30 0.231 0.074 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.007 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.063 50.00 0.980 Discharge Volume from Time Series 3rd-pre.tsf between 06/01/06 06:00 and 07/30/06 23:59 16. Cu-Ft or 0.000 Ac-Ft in 59.8 days Discharge Volume from Time Series 3rd-post.tsf between 06/01/06 00:00 and 07/01/06 23:59 54. Cu-Ft or 0.001 Ac-Ft in 31.0 days Discharge Volume from Time Series roof.tsf between 06/01/06 06:00 and 07/30/06 23:59 154. Cu-Ft or 0.004 Ac-Ft in 59.8 days 2 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Program for Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair of Construction Site BMP's The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance,inspection,and repair of BMPs BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR PRACTICES (BMPs) (all controls) PROGRAM �,.a,,aux-5c-_»�..�.. �a.,.a�a..� ,...L�*.���z,�.�:`� ": t�s ����vxi> ,a��z,.•xu.,s ;;�.�; -�,&u'; SS-1 Scheduling • Inspect protective fencing and repair or replace as necessary ■ Repair or replace damaged vegetation per SS-1 working detail SS-2 Preservation of existing Bi-weekly • Repair damaged roots or vegetation compacted soils in the root zone SS-3 Hydraulic Mulch Bi-weekly • Maintain continuous mulch cover over are to be protected.Re-spray Prior to forecast storm hydraulic mulch as necessary. • As soon as weather and soil SS-5 Hyroseeding conditions permit,repair any slope After a rain even that causes runoff damage and re-spray damaged or from the construction site exposed areas. • Replace and dispose torn or SS-7 Straw Mulch At 24-hour intervals during extended missing sections of plastic covers. rain events Replace or supplement anchors as necessary to keep covers in place. SS-8 Plastic Covers&Erosion Blankets/Mats SS-9 Earth Dikes/Drainage Swales &Lined Ditches 3 The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance, inspection,and repair of BMPs BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR PRACTICES (BMPs) (all controls) PROGRAM �,---,,......c.. m.�o-`.:. .�.... . ».'." . ..bx..,1� ' a^:etw .sm ,..%.a,...�..� .:. .u,�A,e �_. SC-I Silt Fence Bi-weekly • Remove,dispose,and replace damaged,deteriorated,or Prior to forecast storm otherwise unsuitable BMPs • Repair any slope damage as soon SC-2 Desilting Basin as weather conditions permit. After a rain even that cases runoff from the construction site • Aerate soils,reseed,and mulch as needed to maintain a minimum of 6 inches of grass height. At 24-hour intervals during extended • Replace torn sandbags as soon as SC 3 Sediment Trap rain events p required • Replace torn sections of silt fences. Re-key bottom of fences as needed. SC-4 Check Dam • Remove retained sediments before they reach 1/3 of the barrier height or'/z of the sediment holding capacity.Vegetation may need to SC-5 Fiber Rolls be replanted after cleaning • Clean and dispose of accumulated sediment deposited in sediment traps around drainage inlets;re- secure silt fence as needed SC-6 Gravel Berm • Remove BMPs when no longer needed.As directed by the Engineer. Repair slopes/surfaces damaged by BMP removal SC-9 Straw Bale Barrier • Remove trash and debris from open ditches and dispose of properly • Remove woody vegetation that reduces free movements of water SC-10 Storm Drain Inlet Protection through ditches. Recontour and reseed as necessary • Install as needed SC-7 Street Sweeping and Daily when hauling • Inspect site access points daily Vacuuming • Sweep tracked sediment 4 The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance, inspection,and repair of BMPs BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR PRACTICES (BMPs) (all controls) PROGRAM WE-1 Wind Erosion Control Daily • Maintain water trucks and water distribution equipment in good order and fix leaks immediately TC-1 Stabilized Construction Weekly • Replace gravel as necessary Entrance/Exit • Remove excessive soil Prior to forecast storm accumulation • Sweep surrounding areas After a rain event that causes runoff • Construct as needed from the construction site At 24-hour intervals during extended rain events NS-1 Water Conservation Practices Weekly • Inspect site during project execution for evidence of illicit discharges or illegal dumping • Observe site perimeter for evidence NS-3 Paving and Grinding of potential of illicitly discharged Operations or illegally dumped material which may enter the job site NS-5 Clear Water Diversion • Notify the Resident Engineer of any illicit discharges or illegal dumping incidents at the time of discovery NS-6 Illicit Connection/Illegal • Remove,dispose and replace Discharge Detection and damaged,deteriorated,or Reporting otherwise unsuitable BMPs • Remove vehicles and/or equipment NS-8 Vehicle and Equipment that leak Cleaning • Replace drip pans or absorbent materials as needed. Re-stock spill materials. NS-9 Vehicle and Equipment a Remove BMPs when no longer Fueling needed,as directed by the Engineer. Repair slopes/surfaces NS-10 Vehicle and Equipment damaged by BMP removal Maintenance 5 The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance, inspection,and repair of BMPs BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR PRACTICES (BMPs) (all controls) PROGRAM WM-1 Material Delivery and Weekly • Keep storage areas clean,well Storage organized,and equipped with Prior to forecast storm ample clean-up supplies as appropriate for the materials stored WM-2 Material Use After a rain event that causes runoff • Repair or replace perimeter from the construction site controls,containment structures, covers and liners as needed to maintain proper function and WM-4 Spill Prevention and Control At 24-hour intervals during extended protection rain events • Properly remove and dispose accumulated rainwater from containment facilities • WM-5 Solid Waste Management Cover any stockpiles with appropriate mats or covers ■ Maintain waste fluid containers in leak proof condition. Repair or WM-6 Hazardous Waste replace dumpsters that leak Management • Provide timely service and removal to prevent dumpsters and sanitary facilities from overflowing WM-7 Contaminated Soil • Schedule Refuse Contractor to pick Management up waste containers weekly WM-8 Concrete Waste Management Weekly • Remove accumulated debris from concrete washouts. Replace lining and sandbags as necessary. 6 i 41111111th.a.„ MASTEi_ _,AND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES RECEIVED - 33325 8th Avenue South CITY OF RECEIVEDPO Box 9718 Federal % y JULFederal Way WA 98063-9718 7 2006 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com 6 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bill ING APPLICATION NO(S) ao l D k et f'-O o 5 La p6— l°3`f y 3-sate 07-- t-7' D(o Project Name C 15"i`9 iCc�'-si,1'ev:ez'c}' Property Address/Location "" ' . ?'" c `/'3 //e/cr /l'i'" -- • G✓. Parcel Number(s) /21�L19 /YE.S Project Description C ,o, cn',' 4' of 41- 4/iekr. SG,Gce" / ?LL7 ,bc.i1'' l,P1''' ,/1- ..9�4-,--/ !fir PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Applicant Annexation Binding Site Plan Name: feikfla'r) 6'P/ Boundary Line Adjustment Address: Yr/ !1�-S G.:Comp Plan/Rezone �S^'2�3 2- 9 Land Surface Modification City/State: qy�,/f� 6 Gri'¢ z3 Lot Line Elimination Zip: Preapplication Conference Phone:A57_a/_„103-7 Process I(Director=s Approval) Fax:Process II(Site Plan Review) Email: v C. '�nsT�O^ Process III(Project Approval) .9�/•"�( v 1 �.yct� i x Process IV(Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V(Quasi-Judicial Rezone) Agent(if different than Applicant) Process VI /P S r�P 7 SEPA w/Project Name: �'��'� SEPA Only Address: Po. fro-- 657 9�yO y Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use City/State: 6/NA/0 /TY Short Subdivision Zip: Subdivision Phone: ;,1,5 3-l6 ' - Variance: Commercial/Residential Fax: 2.$3 -27y'"7°°� «;.� • Email: S7�4lcn �kc7 ��L Required Information Signature: , 4 S R- Zoning Designation Owner Comprehensive Plan Designation Name: ,P �' 'C'�' - Value of Existing Improvements Address:� 3/O 3�`���� S'6*/ City/State:R,D ,o, t/p y/ e fs -3 00000 Value of Proposed Improvements Zip: International Building Code(IBC): Phone: .5.-3 • `j a�• a y/b Fax: S/..Y6 6r F•�r/C Y Occupancy Type Email: li, CV Pe-rz- © G,k c..A S i. ricr wa n FAAir0/- Construction Type ,•:. n Bulletin#003-August 18,2004 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application ACITY OF MEMORANDUM Federal Way Public Works Department DATE: February 15, 2007 TO: David Lee FROM: Sean Wells, P . SUBJECT: GUPTA - (06-1 3491- -UP) *NO SITE ADDRESS* - Public Works Development Services Land Use Approval We have reviewed the plans and reports submitted for the above mentioned project. We are satisfied that the project can be built as shown, and have no other comments or conditions at this time. We accept the project and recommend land use approval. Please let me know if there are any other items to be reviewed with this project. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 25668 104TH AVENUE SE,KENT,WA 98031 PHONE: (253)520-7691 FAX: (253)856-9775 ORDER NO: 001204254 YOUR NO: GROGAN TO GUPTA UNIT NO: 11 LOAN NO: SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT T ORDER REFERENCE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: 1 SELLER: _._ PETER.L. _.GROGAN PURCHASER/BORROWER: PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA AND VINA GUPTA PROPERTY ADDRESS: 293XX 3RD AVENUE FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98023 Our Title Commitment dated 02/28/06 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: U PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 10 HAS (HAVE) BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: • V 1 . GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1 , SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 2006 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 119600-1465-08 LEVY CODE: 1205 RECEI VEl� ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 48,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 JU L. f 7 700E GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 566.18 CITY PAID: $ 284.59 g O��NGERAC Wqy UNPAID: $ 284.59 DEp�o r THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE FEBRUARY 28, 2006, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTED HEREINABOVE. JULY 5, 2006 AUTHORIZED BY: PENNI K. WARREN SUPPLCOM/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 25668 104TH AVENUE SE,IENT,WA 98031 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Order No.: 1204254 Title Unit: U-11 Customer Number: GROGAN TO GUPTA Phone: (253)520-7691 Buyer(s): PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA AND VINA GUPTA Fax: (253)856-9775 Officer: LORI FORBES,PENNI WARREN,JANE PERRY Commitment Effective Date: FEBRUARY 28,2006 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: PREMIUM APPLICABLE BETWEEN$260,001.00-$280,000.00 ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $280,000.00 1992 STANDARD Premium: $ 945.00 NON-RESIDENTIAL PRIOR POLICY RATE Tax: 83.16 Proposed Insured: PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA AND VINA GUPTA, HUSBAND AND WIFE Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Amount: $0.0 0 Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Amount: $0.0 0 Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: 2.The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3.Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: PETER L. GROGAN, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT COMMA1305/I C/u.1.05 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1204254 Your No.: GROGAN TO GUPTA LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) LOTS 17 THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 17, BUENNA ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 29, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH HALF OF SOUTHWEST 294TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THIRD STREET) ADJOINING LOTS 17 THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE, OF SAID BLOCK 17, AS VACATED BY JUDGMENT ENTERED JUNE 12, 1987 IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 87-2-07370-0; AND TOGETHER-WITH-THE -WEST-HAL-F-- OF VACATED TH-IRD AVENUE SOUTHWEST (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHERRY STREET) LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTHWEST 293RD STREET AND NORTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 294TH STREET; EXCEPT THE WEST 15 FEET THEREOF, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTHWEST 293RD STREET AND NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 OF SAID BLOCK 17 EXTENDED EASTERLY, AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8704160180. CLTACMA6/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Order No.: 1204254 Your No.: GROGAN TO GUPTA Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. -Easements-or-claims-.of-easements,notshownby the public reccr4 . D. Any lien,or right to a lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers' compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity or construction charges for sewer,water, • electricity,other utilities,or garbage collection and disposal. G.Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights,claims,or title to water. I. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records,or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW WLTACOMB/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 001204254 Your No.: GROGAN TO GUPTA SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. LANDSCAPE EASEMENT, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: NOVEMBER 9, 1993 RECORDING NUMBER: 9311091177 a 2. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9505189005, AS FOLLOWS: BUILDING SETBACK LINES AND FENCE `INSIDE BOUNDARY: c 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PURPOSE: SEWER MAINS WITH THE NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: THE NORTH 5 FEET OF THE WEST 10 FEET OF LOT 19, BLOCK 17, AND OTHER PROPERTY RECORDED: AUGUST 15, 1983 RECORDING NUMBER: 8308150535 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: REAL ESTATE CONTRACT IN FAVOR OF: OWNERS OF PROPERTY TO THE NORTHWEST PURPOSE: INGRESS AND EGRESS AFFECTS: THE WEST 5 FEET OF THE NORTH 130 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF SAID PREMISES LYING WITHIN VACATED THIRD AVENUE SOUTHWEST RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 RECORDING NUMBER: 8309300065 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES AREA AFFECTED: THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE WEST 45 CLTACMB1/RDA/O CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1204254 Your No.: GROGAN TO GUPTA SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FEET OF VACATED THIRD AVENUE SOUTHWEST RECORDED: APRIL 08, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8704081015 F 6. SEWER CHARGE IN LIEU OF ASSESSMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: AMOUNT-: — ....1;3$0 00 RECORDED: JULY 12, 1984 RECORDING NUMBER: 8407120316 FILED BY: LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT o 7. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT AND: THE GRADDON COMPANY / WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE CO. INC. RECORDED: MAY 12, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER: 8905120214 REGARDING: REIMBURSEMENT FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE OF WATER FACILITIES s AFFECTS: THAT PORTION OF SAID PREMISES LYING WITHIN BLOCK 17 AND OTHER PROPERTY r 8. RIGHTS TO LAY WATER AND GAS MAINS IN ALL STREETS AS RESERVED IN SAID PLAT. 9. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CLTACMB2/RDA/ CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 12 042 54 Your No.: GROGAN TO GUPTA SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. x 10. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 2006 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 199600-1465-08 - 1205 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 48,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 569.18 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 569.18 • L 11. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. NOTE 1: THE FOLLOWING DEED(S) AFFECTING SAID LAND WAS (WERE) RECORDED WITHIN 24 MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THIS COMMITMENT: NONE x NOTE 2: AS OF THE DATE HEREOF THERE ARE NO MATTERS WHICH WOULD APPEAR AS EXCEPTIONS IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE AGAINST: PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA AND VINA GUPTA o NOTE 3: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE CLTACMB2/RDA/O CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1204254 Your No.: GROGAN TO GUPTA SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS COUNTY RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. FOR DETAILS OF THESE STATEWIDE REQUIREMENTS PLEASE VISIT THE KING COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE WEBSITE AT WWW.METROKC.GOV/RECELEC/RECORDS AND SELECT ONLINE FORMS AND DOCUMENT STANDARDS. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE -LE-6-221—IlikRiPTiON-WHICH-IvItIST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: LOTS 17-19, BLOCK 17, VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 29. END OF SCHEDULE B 4 TO EXPEDITE THE COMPLETION OF YOUR CLOSING, PLEASE FORWARD YOUR CLOSING ORDER AND RECORDING DOCUMENTS TO: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY - CENTRAL RECORDING 701 FIFTH AVENUE, 33RD FLOOR SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 THANK YOU, UNIT 11 - SOUTHEND TITLE UNIT CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1204254 Your No.: GROGAN TO GUPTA SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS B THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS COMMITMENT: CTI/BRENDA SPORCIC KIM 3/2 COPIES (253) 945-9140 JOHN L SCOTT REAL ESTATE w _. _ . TONY HETTLER 1/1_ (206)246-0344 PRUDENTIAL MACPHERSON'S RAJ GUPTA 2/1 (425)778-2101 CLTACMB2/RDA/° F ILE CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: Gupta New Single-Family Residence Description: The applicant proposes construction of a new 3,130 square-foot single-family structure located within the setback area for a major stream. Applicant: Primod and Vina Gupta, 32632 20th Avenue SW,Federal Way Location: 293rd block of 3rd Avenue SW Staff Contact: David Lee,Associate Planner, 253-835-2622 Date Application Received: July 17,2006 Date of Notice of Application: September 16,2006 Date Determined Complete: August 16,2006 Comment Due Date: October 2,2006 Permits Required by this Application: Process IV Approval pursuant to Federal Way City Code Chapter 22,Article VII(File#06-102454-UP),Environmental Review(File#06-102455-SE) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations and City Plans to be Used for Project Review and Consistency Known at This Time:The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes,policies, and regulations, including Federal Way City Code(FWCC)Chapter 18, `Environmental Protection";FWCC Chapter 19,"Planning and Development";FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; FWCC Chapter 22,"Zoning";Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP);King County Surface Water Design Manual;King County Road Standards; and International Building, Fire, and Mechanical Codes. The Process IV application is subject to Hearing Examiner review.The date of the hearing is yet to be determined.The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718,Federal Way,WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community Development Services by 5:00 p.m.on October 2, 2006.Any interested person will be given the opportunity to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and to give comments orally at the hearing. Details of appeal procedures for the Process IV decision will be included with the written decision. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 16, 2006. 06-103491 Doc.ID.37672 Map Date:September,2006 City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way,WA 98063 CITY OF isp� This map is intended for use as a graphical representation ONLY. Federal Way The City of Federal Way makes no warrenty as to its accuracy. Gupta Single Family SW 292ND ST. SW 292ND ST. 1 ._ ,..; S.W.293RD ST. S.W.293RD ST. 0 \ / / ."),/ / > SITE R. I es N a $ in k N G 1 \ \ \ 1 I 1 / , . S.W.297TH ST. i r)\ r-- AN 200 0 200 400 600 800 Feet SITE ADDRESS: 293rd block and 3rd Ave. SW. 11181fC!Of aMp Dale el ppub callem 06rnu6 Noe*faRM tier: DNodp ion: The ap. �,...: cow.. atrucction of a new 3,130 square-foot single- family structure located within the setback aret tor a major stream. 2� Primod and Vina Gupta, 32632 nue SW, Federal Way-Location:. 263ldbbck of 3rd Avenue SW i-Contact: David Lee,Aasooiete � '': 25342622 , y DaleAenlo won Received. 17, •Dale of of Application: p ° ;. 2006 . Dale Determined Co August 1 Comment Due Date 2,2006• Permits Required by this Applicatfioi i cess N Approval pursuant to F ede Cie Code Chapter 22, Article VII (Fes 112484-UP), Environmental'Reviebr 106-102455-SE) A. Relevant Environmental'Docume ON n Ale at the Address Below X Yes DevelopmentRegulations-,arid-.City . be Used for Project Review and Co Known at This Time:The project will viewed for consistency with all . cerise, policies, and regulations, l'°"`'� Mile Way City Coda( WCC) "fpwbeamental Protection"; FUICC 1 'Chinning and DevelopMent"; CU1giler 21, Surface and , ssMnMr;FWCC Cr22,7.orni - wet Way ComprehensivePlan(FWC d<.. Q`ewdy Surface Water.Design Man 4 ` Road Standards; and Fire,and MechwilcalCodes Processlite IV application Is so '„„la l ing:Examiner review The date ; MlbS ..yet to be determined..Th e is available for pubAc A ent of Community Dev Services (33325 8th Avenue South 9716, Federal Way, WA 98063-971 CIZper Orr may submit written comma " `• K, ues application or the peel of the proposal to the Director •fly `"' on OCbber 2 2006.elopmentAn on interested we be given the opportunity to submit ' .' comments to the Hearing Examiner and to FEDERAL WAY r) r) lr) \J \J \J - Your Community Newspaper - Affidavit of Publication Debbie Kaufman, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is the Publisher of The Federal Way Minor, a semi-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi-weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County,Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed • in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way L-1140 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 16th day of September, 2006 , and ending on the 16th day of September, 2006, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $90.30 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090 Subscribed to and sworn before me this 21st day of September, 2006. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way —�— (cLf ‘,\OTAR y �^N•. • a Q.- -9J;$%- ��'.� 4. R0. � i,,OF w S', `�. 1414 SO. 324TH STREET,SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003 I 253-925-5565 ■ FAX:253-925-5750 Map Date:September,2006 City of Federal Way Al11. 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way,WA 98063 CITYOF This map is intended for use as a graphical representation ONLY. Federal Way The City of Federal Way makes no warrenty as to its accuracy. Gupta Single Family SW 292ND ST. SW 292ND ST. N - ui n S.W.293RD ST. S.W.293RD ST. U' / / SITE o id Z a. 0 vs S 4! Q J N ---\ S.W. 297TH ST. a L 200 0 200 400 600 800 Feet SITE ADDRESS: 293rd block and 3rd Ave. SW. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SE 1 /4 of the NE 1 /4 of Section 6, Township BASIS21 oNo Rt�h, Range 4 East, W.M. BEA FOUND BRASS CAP IN CONCRETE MON. IN 1979. FOUND HUB & TACK W/2' OFFSET PK NAILS (8-23-94) 2� N 88'59'18" / ' ---a rn 90.00' pDHWM-17 � OHWM-18< \ `� N \ �k \ o \ \ 16 DHWM-15 DHWM-1 DHWM-13 / DHWM- \ 0 OHWM-I \a z / DHWM- WM-9 /cs) 7 �6 DHWM-6 DH M / i HWM-d� \HWM / 90.00' S 88'59' 18" E 90 ' / O N DOE �ASPHAL7 THICKEN/ 90 25' 25 f r I SITE BENCH I N 88 59 18 W 479.96' FOUND IN SW 292ND ST. BRASS D SKCSTAMPED of of "H. S. W.R. 1973" IN CONCRETE IN CASE W (8-23-94) Q Z N 0' 20' 40' 60' SCALE 1"=20' 0 MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED 0 FOUND REBAR & CAP LS 10708 FOUND PK NAIL o FLAG PLACED BY OTHERS LOCATED 6-9-06 BASIS OF BEARING SURVEY RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9505189005, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 17, 18 AND 19, BLOCK 17, IN THE PLAT OF BUENNA, AS RECORDED IN VOL. 6 OF PLATS AT PAGE 29, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY 15.00 FEET OF VACATED 3RD AVE S ADJACENT AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF VACATED SW 294TH ST ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS 17, 18 AND 19 AND TO SAID WESTERLY 15.00 FEET OF 3RD AVE SW VERTICAL DATUM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BENCH MARK NO. FW115 HSWR MONUMENT IN CASE "1973" LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF SW 292ND ST AND 2ND AVE SW ELEV = 67.6' SITE BENCH PK NAIL AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY, ELEV = 90.33' RECEIVE® JUL 1 7 2005 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. SURVEY NOTES: 1. SURVEY PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE AND ELECTRONIC DATA COLLECTION USING TOPCON GTS 211D TOTAL STATION AND CARLSON DATA COLLECTION. 2. CLOSURES EXCEEDED THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AS ESTABLISHED BY WAC 332-130- 090. 3. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR OTHERWISE. 4. PROPERTY CORNERS SET, EXCEPT AS NOTED, REPRESENT DEED LOCATIONS. OWNERSHIP LINES MAY BE DIFFERENT, OBVIOUS ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, ARE SHOWN. HOWEVER, NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED ❑HW18 „ FOUND BRASS CAP IN CONCRETE MON. IN 1979. FOUND HUB & TACK W/2' OFFSET PK NAILS (8-23-94) 0 Lo F:1"14raAFjwj BASIS OF BEARING N 88'59'18' W _ 479.96' SW 202ND ST. � h FOUND PUNCH IN BRASS DISK STAMPI (i) "H.S.W.R. 1973" IN CONCRETE IN CASE w (8-23-94) Q � tl I— GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 M I I I ( IN FEET 1 inch = 20 it. BASIS OF BEARING SURVEY RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9505189005, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 17, 16 AND 19, BLOCK 17, IN THE PLAT OF BUENNA. AS RECORDED IN VOL, 6 OF PLATS AT PAGE 29. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY 15.00 FEET OF VACATED 3RD AVE S ADJACENT. AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF VACATED SW 294TH ST ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS 17. 18 AND 19 AND TO SAID WESTERLY 15.00 FEET OF 3RD AVE SW. EASEMENTS EASEMENT NO, 8308150535 N 5' OF W 10' OF LOT 19 BLK 17 AND OTHER PROPERTY I EASEMENT NO. 8309300065 W 5' OF N 130' OF THAT PORTION OF SAID PREMISES LYING WITHIN VACATED 311D AVE SW EASEMENT NO. 8704081015 EASTERLY 30' OF THE W 45' OF VACATED 3RD AVE Sw VERTICAL DATUM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BENCH MARK NO. FW115 HSWR MONUMENT IN CASE "1973" LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF SW 292ND ST AND 2ND AVE SW: ELEV = 67.6' SITE BENCH PK NAIL AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY.• ELEV = 90X FINAL DATE SCALE COCHTCKEDON 10/16/06 1 "= 20' DESIGNED CHECKED BY GET GAT DATE PROJECT NAME MACKEY9 FIELD BOOKS DRAWING NAME NO R E V I S 1 0 N DATE 1 APPD I SITE PLAN Caen grt C:r""do 'liar Dispersion TreT lwz. 1 No of, fboCii:"4•.] :3£ s s'"}ifF£ts}gt',-m prfJ$C.r{"2£'r. i—,ri' aii re's £i . . ✓;t£?d'£I'iresp;101`. of 11 T.<' 3j�t 26, lee, ir.. I Srf�".i£g fT'3mA # g nwirt:Wm"'o i /£t:P44.gq} 11lYrs rY.s'�'I%1 of lr4nr'iiony j?£'operty bete' Ss'.r[:Ci1/is£•fn�,, n s ea ,, !f Y :e ' F; S i ..£' 4 .r l t /} at a:l'.,saf11. iys'>r'%iis};.s; 0.:tTs„s;:`•s"4Gt._, aLii°°ui�'. � �{ rs•;,%1<£G? i€Ysle � , Mf ays 601, CA of f4sivr(•j51': f1"f%F.°r''. 1'e f?'?"<f%rft�%1<}'35l i"if:4?>G.r ty �^<"t;4>::%:i'.':i ez £i�T'. '.£'}f+• :ra;,+f;ext f�3sf �J£T„ess:_a�� •s'+✓�a:. ;�,:;n�it��r�� �a €;e�af�rs ar£��e,£r:i ic�aer�:3;a 'tl'<:'tkfishsYk i£=41�1i;�t£a. S. T3£'£if'1< 3 (I£E#j up tu' 76 S rf jugfe hitt £TC foof £3T.^.£3 FwAy r?3.''sfr£pie 10- '£y y-f}_?r < try 2-loot Wide , >- vel fi ;e £ j G:<• �• x r •, 7 :� +f ;t'< <i C ;4�T�1Y...o>�•:s.sl"3£i'v:' 2 I''£gi:.�C •.7•a1.. Fm- £C£-'l arew> par,Y th af1700 .*„'£;lsa£% e lk.; '' ' a LA£P t-sli£;%3 vvil'!'£ f'rf Ad Ied fjfrar&o j]x;"drd as slIovY iiI P,9ta+a 9-5 rn£ay be mwxl :a:;. fap4r£rrved by lis—" f ty. T%if 1431'v:'£j 6B d�1j3 f,f{ iXi'ib j P £fy£1 r£2{I i ?3C£L f "J.rl�w 4 "�%{k?¢:t iii3j f'"t.'if�;z £;?%ti'si%t~ e7'f {:;x8r<` "�fJ §L":r z £.>11£'t':ig'+:.yE .`;r {4"S:s s��4iJ�)4:: I•f:E:� {y SG3C� fiJf:'.�3. 4. 11 d ilmemloj•••r * <!1t£'t s s ... ;y c Ie c 1 f fe o s •�s 3F.. s :., .,y , ii1€< �. t�:...:�.J.1'S � I<�'<Y11 :�s•£y.,iri£c.�.f. . !s £3Y>.:.tis.'rF3£v,':'>¢,'.'j�''l?iP.'..f``.,"i 's iM be ,£.Y,�.7�£ the mIig4Y;£.am 10 feet in order lama ntiain a 11 We. M%-;e for tti''11txe excavation s'9n fririr3Tef•;A£34;e. 6.. Alt £w?<s11erxfl r,., Csy x1f::£71 f .fj•C'£iI be placed at t+M'e1.•sl -5 feet fmi.n any XtfjT? fty jirk.. is 3GC ;"sf3i?j, sot;-nsoi a rAvAR 5e iftts.`.:£s a'x--d from j}:Y rniwi.&i'lum £7 km,t ir'£ £ }f def,''£xi £r}is'jrAa£f £ 11 11 `>2£ $k sI4'X,�.3e I'm 'if1"ure i r)i Fy.-Im ;s1T -vf ttuf3`?. s £: sy''s'.• .�'?f, se%�kC/ f};; m 33f'7C,'./�svet .-i£"?.w' ve'ee•,.''p Ropey iai.ds:fd I?•�4a'.r..�.'f31 'irE.1„; 1fi } £;.r'.3'•S£C<:rt i'ic€Ti.3%d .h �?s �. as £,�fj�?,°¢;.ined 'sf SIN 1aL;YFr£1i rylhir££C%yf%psi £r:uk, STATISTICAL BREAKDOWN OF PROJECT SITE AREA: TOTAL PARKING GROSS FLOOR AREAS PARCEL NO. 119600-1465 ADDRESS 293XX 3RD AVE SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 15,300 SF. = 0.35 ACRES 6 PARKING SPACES MAIN FLOOR = 1640 SF UPPER FLOOR = 1490 SF WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERED BY THOMPSON CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 172 136TH ST E TACOMA, WA 98445 OFFICE (253) 441-0647 GUPTA Basin Statistics NEW HOUSE 1 @ 1900$F 1900 0.043618 DECK 368 0,008448 PORCH 122 0.002601 DRIVEWAYS 1 r07755F' 775 0.017792 TOTAL. NEW IMPERVIOUS 3165 0.072658 PERVIOUS EXISTING BASIS! TOTAL EX PERVIOUS 12135 15300 DISPERSION TRENCH L=(IMPERVIOUSAREAi700)x10 = THOMPSON CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING GUPTA RESIDENCE SITE PLAN 0.35124 0.35124 45.21 S1 SHEET NO. ESUBMI-FTED SHEET OF OCT 1 d 2006 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT.