Loading...
93-101102 FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: February 2, 1994 TO: City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee Councilmember Skip Priest, Chair FROM: Gregory D. Moore, AICP - Director of Community Development Services 4 Contact: Stephen Clifton, AICP - Senior Plannerr%, l + RE: PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH FACILITY Federal Way File No. UPR93-0007 Related File No.'s SEP93-0009 and SPR93-0016 I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION The proposal is to construct an 88,130 square foot, two story office and research facility on a 5.8 acre site for Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. Existing zoning for subject site is Office Park (OP). Access is proposed at four locations. One along South 333rd Street, two along South 334th Street, and one along 8th Avenue South. II. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION The Hearing Examiner may only render a recommendation in a Process III review. The final decision for all such requests rests with the City Council. Bringing this matter before the City Council Land Use Committee for review and recommendation prior to the full Council is consistent with how land use matters are currently processed by the City. HI. HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION To approve the proposed Paragon proposal subject to mitigating measures contained in the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. Pages 1 through 4 of the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation contain findings and conclusions which serve as a basis for the recommendation. The entire recommendation is attached. IV. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY May 27, 1993 The application for Use Process III approval filed with the city. September 27, 1993 Revised site plan submitted to the city. November 16, 1993 Federal Way State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Responsible Official issued a SEPA Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS). December 15, 1993 SEPA appeal period expired. No appeals were filed with the city. January 4, 1994 Hearing Examiner public hearing. January 18, 1994 Hearing Examiner issued recommendation to approve the application. - Pursuant to Chapter 22, Article VIII, Process III Review of the Federal Way City Code, the Hearing Examiner shall issue a written recommendation to the City Council (see attached). February 1, 1994 Hearing Examiner recommendation appeal period expired. No appeals were filed with the city. February 8, 1994 City Council Land Use Committee meeting. - Land Use Committee forwards a recommendation to the full City Council. February 15, 1994 City Council meeting. - Pursuant to Section 22-490 of Federal Way City Code, the City Council shall consider the application at a scheduled meeting. V. DECISIONAL CRITERIA City Council's review of the application is limited to the record of the hearing before the Hearing Examiner, the Examiner's written report, compliance with applicable ordinances and regulations of the King County Code and with review criteria set forth in Section 22- 490.d of the Federal Way City Code. Section 22-490.d allows the application be approved if it is consistent with: 1. The Comprehensive Plan, 2. All applicable provisions of the Code, including those adopted by reference from the Comprehensive Plan, and 3. Public health, safety and welfare. VI. COUNCIL ACTION A draft resolution recommending approval of the proposed application as recommended by the Hearing Examiner is attached. After consideration of the record before the Hearing Examiner, the City Council may, by action approved by a majority of the total membership, take one of the following actions: 1. Approve the Application, or 2. Approve the Application with minor modifications, or 3. Deny the Application, or 4. Remand the matter back to the Hearing Examiner for further consideration, or 5. Schedule a public hearing before the City Council, in order to consider non-minor modifications to the application. The City Council shall not substantially modify the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner without first referring the matter back to the Hearing Examiner or conducting its own public hearing of the application. I:paragon\upr93007.CC 1 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER IN THE MATTER OF: ) FWBE#: 94-4 FILE #: UPR93-0007 PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH ) SEP93-0009 FACILITY ) SPR93-0016 ) ) I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION The proposal is to construct an 88, 130 square foot, two story office and research facility on a 5.8 acre site for Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. Existing zoning for subject site is Office Park (OP) . Access is proposed at four locations. One along South 333rd Street, two along South 334th Street, and one along 8th Avenue South. II. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Hearing Date: January 4, 1994 Decision Date: January 18, 1994 At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence: 1. Stephen Clifton, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way 33530 - 1st Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 2. George Sherwin, P.O. Box 130, Bellevue, WA 98009 At the hearing the following exhibits were admitted as part of the official record of these proceedings: 1. Staff Report with all attachments. III. FINDINGS 1 . The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into the record, and taken this matter under advisement. 2 . The Community Development Department staff report sets forth general findings, applicable policies and provisions in this matter, and is hereby marked as Exhibit 1 and incorporated in this report by reference as though set forth in full herein. 3. All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Way Zoning Code. 4. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) , RCW 43.21C, the responsible official of the City of Federal Way issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) for the proposed development on November 16, 1993 . The determination was based on review of information in the project file including the environmental checklist, and site visits resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not result in probably significant adverse impacts on the environment provided that the applicant complies with the SEPA conditions. Affected agencies, tribes, and the public were offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination for 29 days. 5. The Quadrant Corporation has a possessory ownership interest in a 5.8 acre rectangular shaped parcel of property bordered on the north by South 333rd Street, on the east by 8th Avenue South, and on the south by South 334th Street within the City of Federal Way. The applicant is proposing to improve the site with an 88, 130 square foot, two story office and research facility and associated parking. Following construction the building will become the home office of Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. Paragon is currently operating its business at several locations and will consolidate its operation at this site upon completion. In the balance of the Findings, Conclusions, and Decision, the Quadrant Corporation and Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. , are collectively referred to collectively as the "applicant" . 6. Topography of the site varies from areas which are virtually flat to 27% slopes. Soils are Everett Alderwood gravelly sandy loam which have slight to moderate erosion potential and slow to medium storm water runoff. The applicant must prepare a temporary erosion/sedimentation control plan to address erosion as part of the development process. 7. The applicant proposes to direct site generated storm water into an existing storm water system located in South 334th Street. This system empties into Lake No. 3, which in turn drains into Lake Nos. 1 and 6. While Lake No. 3 has sufficient storm water capacity to handle runoff from the site, Lakes 1 and 6 have insufficient capacity and SEPA mitigating measures address this issue. It is noted that the Franciscan Health Services project will increase the storage capacity of Lake No. 6 sufficient to handle the entire drainage basin upon complete development. The applicant has agreed to all mitigating measures set forth in the MDNS which will ensure proper drainage for the site. 8. The site is presently undeveloped and heavily wooded with second and third growth coniferous and broad-leafed trees. Birds and small animals are found on the site consistent with said vegetation. There are no sensitive plant or animal species on site nor sensitive areas such as wetlands and steep slopes which require protection. 9. The site is located in an urbanized neighborhood with all utilities and services available. Office uses surround the site in all directions. The applicant's proposal will blend in well with existing development and will complement the area. 10. A review of the site plan reveals that the office building is proposed for the west central portion of the site. Parking lots are located between the building and all bordering streets. Section 22-1441(a) of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) states that "Wherever feasible. . .buildings. . .should be located between the street and the parking area. " The applicant submitted a request to the Director of the Department of Community Development that the requirement of said section not be imposed as the design criteria and site characteristics will not allow the separation requirement. The Director agreed with the applicant and granted the request. Since the property is bordered by three streets, it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to locate the building between parking and the streets. The applicant's site plan provides a campus setting, maximizing retention of existing trees and screening from adjacent roadways. The plan also minimizes grading and allows the maximum retention of significant trees. The applicant has also provided extensive landscaping on perimeter streets, and the interior property line which will ensure visual compatibility. For the above stated reasons as well as other reasons contained in Exhibit "H" to the staff report, the Director's decision to waive the requirements of Section 22-1441(a) FWCC is well founded and correct. 11. The applicant commissioned the Transpo Group to perform a traffic impact analysis for the project. This analysis was submitted May 3, 1993 (Exhibit "I" to Staff Report) , and was approved by the Department of Public Works. The traffic study establishes that the site will generate approximately 1, 140 vehicle trips per day. While such traffic volume will not create the need to construct new roadways or traffic safety improvements, the applicant is required to make pro rata share contributions to mitigate traffic impacts at four locations as set forth in mitigating measure number two in the MDNS. 12 . The site is located within the boundaries of the Interim 1990 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan which designates the area as Industrial/Office Park. The applicant's proposal complies with the intent of the comprehensive plan by providing sidewalks for improved pedestrian circulation, landscaping, trip reduction measures, local access street entry, and the preparation of a temporary erosion/sedimentation control plan. The proposed two story office and research facility is an allowed use in the current zoning classification of Office Park. 13 . Under the OP zoning, sites exceeding five acres in size are subject to Process III review pursuant to Article VIII FWCC. Section 22-484 FWCC provides that the applicant has the burden of proof of showing that it is entitled to the requested land use. Section 22-487 FWCC requires the hearing examiner to make a recommendation of approval to the Federal Way City Council if the Examiner finds that the applicant's project satisfies the criteria set forth in Section 22-490 (D) FWCC. Findings required on each criteria set forth therein are hereby made as follows: A. The applicant's project is consistent with the Interim 1990 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan which designates the site as Industrial/Office Park. Furthermore, the applicant's proposed use is allowed outright in the site's present zone classification of Office Park. B. The project was reviewed by City agencies, Fire District No. 39, and the Federal Way Water and Sewer District. All reviewing agencies find that the project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Federal Way City Code including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan. C. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. IV. CONCLUSIONS From the foregoing findings the Hearing Examiner makes the following conclusions: 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented by this request. 2 . The proposed development of the 5.8 acre site located at 750 South 334th Street between South 333rd and 334th Streets and to the west of 8th Avenue South into an 88, 130 square foot two story office and research facility meets all of the criteria set forth in Section 22-490(D) of the Federal Way City Code. Therefore, the requested development should be approved subject to the mitigating measures contained in the SEPA Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance issued November 16, 1993 . RECO)O4ENDATION: It is hereby recommended that the City Council of the City of Federal Way approve the applicant's proposed 88, 130 square foot, two story office and research facility as set forth on Exhibit "A" to the staff report, subject to the mitigating measures contained in the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. DATED THIS I DAY OF January, 1994 . (///:27 ST EN . CAUSSEAUX, Hearing Examiner 0, VI. RIGHTS TO RECONSIDERATION AND CHALLENGE Any person who has a right to challenge a recommendation under the Federal Way Zoning Code may request the Hearing Examiner to reconsider any aspect of his or her recommendation by delivering a written request for reconsideration to the Planning Department within seven (7 ) calendar days after the date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. The person requesting the reconsideration shall specify in the request what aspect of the recommendation he or she wishes to have reconsidered and the reason for the request. The distribution of the request and the response to the request shall be governed pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Way Zoning Code. Within ten ( 10) working days after receiving a request for reconsideration, the Hearing Examiner shall notify the persons who have a right to appeal under the Federal Way Zoning Code, whether or not the recommendation will be reconsidered. The Hearing Examiner may reconsider the recommendation only if he or she concludes that there is substantial merit in the request. The process of the reconsideration will be followed in accordance with the Federal Way Zoning Code. The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner may be challenged by any person who is to receive a copy of that recommendation pursuant to FWZC 155.60.6. That challenge, in the form of a letter of challenge, must be delivered to the Planning Department within fourteen ( 14) calendar days after the issuance of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation or, if a request for reconsideration is filed, then within fourteen ( 14) calendar days of either the decision of the Hearing Examiner denying the request for reconsideration or the reconsidered recommendation. The letter of challenge must contain a clear reference to the matter being challenged and a statement of the specific factual findings and conclusions of the Hearing Examiner disputed by the person filing the challenge. The person filing the challenge shall include, with the letter of appeal, the fee established by the City. The challenge will not be accepted unless it is accompanied by the required fee. The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner may be challenged whether or not there was a request to reconsider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH FACILITY Federal Way File No. UPR93-0007 Related File No.'s SEP93-0009 and SPR93-0016 • PUBLIC HEARING - JANUARY 4, 1994 3:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS FEDERAL WAY CITY HALL - 33530 1ST WAY S. (206-661-4118) Report Prepared by: Stephen Clifton, AICP Senior Planner . r TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION 1 II. GENERAL INFORMATION 1 III. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND 2 IV. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE 2 V. AGENCIES CONTACTED BY FEDERAL WAY 3 VI. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 3 1. Topography 2. Soils 3. Hydrography 4. Vegetation 5. Wildlife 6. Sensitive Areas VII. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS 5 VIII. GENERAL DESIGN 5 IX. TRANSPORTATION 5 1. Traffic Generation X. PUBLIC SERVICES 6 1. Parks and Open Space XI. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 6 XII. STATUTES/CODES 6 XIII. CONCLUSIONS 7 XIV. RECOMMENDATION 7 EXHIBITS Exhibit A Site Plan. Exhibit B Vicinity Map. Exhibit C Letter from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR), dated 11/22/1993. Exhibit D Letter from the Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDOE), dated 1129/1993. Exhibit E Letter from METRO, dated 12/1/1993. Exhibit F Level I - Downstream Analysis, prepared by ESM, Inc., dated March 1993. Exhibit G A review of the seven (7) core and twelve (12) special requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), dated 9/22/1993. Exhibit H Letter from George Sherwin, Vice President of the Quadrant Corporation addressing Section 22-1441(a) of the FWCC, dated 9/23/1993. Exhibit I Traffic Impact Analysis for Paragon Trade Brands Facility, prepared by the Transpo Group, dated 5/3/1993. Exhibit 7 Response to issues raised by the Federal Way Traffic Analyst related to accidents, peak hour factor, level of service calculations for certain intersections, signal warrants, and pro-rata share contributions, submitted on 10/14/1993. Exhibit K Letter to George Sherwin regarding Site Plan approval (includes Findings for Site Plan Approval), dated 12/20/1993. I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposal is to construct an 88,130 square foot, two story office and research facility on a 5.8 acre site for Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. (Exhibit A). Existing zoning for subject site is Office Park (OP). Access is proposed at four locations. One along South 333rd Street, two along South 334th Street, and one along 8th Avenue South. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Location: 750 South 334th Street, between South 333rd and 334th Streets, and to the west of 8th Avenue South (Exhibit B). Owner/ Developer: Randy Hamblin The Quadrant Corporation P.O. Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 (206) 455-2900 Project Manager: George F. Sherwin, Jr. Vice President The Quadrant Corporation P.O. Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 (206) 455-2900 Zoning: Office Park (OP). Comprehensive Plan Designation: Industrial/Office Park. Acreage: 5.8 acres. S-T-R 17-21-04 Sewage Disposal: Federal Way Water and Sewer District. Water Supply: Federal Way Water and Sewer District. 1 Fire District: No. 39 - Federal Way III. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND The proposal is to construct an 88,130 square foot, two story office and research facility on a 5.8 acre site for Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. Activities on site will include research and office uses. The initial application was reviewed before the Community Development Review Committee ("CDRC") on May 27, 1993. Based on comments received from the CDRC, the applicant submitted a revised site plan on September 27, 1993. Under OP zoning, sites exceeding five acres in size are subject to Use Process III review which requires a hearing before the Federal Way Hearing Examiner and Site Plan approval by the Director of Community Development Services. A recommendation by the Hearing Examiner will be forwarded to the City Council for a final decision. IV. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C, the responsible official of the City of Federal Way issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) for the proposed development on November 16, 1993. The determination was based on review of information in the project file including the environmental checklist, and site visits resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not result in probable significant adverse impacts on the environment provided that the applicant complies with the SEPA conditions. Affected agencies, tribes, and the public were offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination for 29 days. The SEPA MDNS contained the following conditions: 1. Runoff from the site shall be controlled by the use of on-site detention per the King County Surface Design Manual (KCSWDM) and recommendation BW-2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan unless additional regional detention is developed in Lake No. 1 as currently proposed by the Quadrant Corporation. 2. The following contributions for each TIP project, impacted by the proposed project, shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of any construction permits. a. $26,300 - S 336th Street @ SR 99 TIP project, widening to five 2 lanes and signal modification; b. $2,300 - 1st Avenue S - S 320th Street to S 316th Street, roadway widening and realignment; c. $24,800 - S 348th Street - I-5 to SR 99, roadway realignment and signal modification; and d. $1,800 - S 333rd Street/lst Way S, signalization of the intersection, Responses received during the 15-day comment period of the MDNS include: Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WSDNR) (Exhibit C), Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDOE) (Exhibit D), and METRO (Exhibit E). The WSDNR stated that a Forest Practices permit will be required to harvest timber from the site. The WSDOE raised issues regarding the type of fill used and the type of permit required for certain types of fill material used. METRO recommended a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) be used by the applicants. The TMP would include actions such as employee transportation services; subsidies; information and promotions, and site design. The appeal period ended on December 15, 1993. No appeals were filed with the City. V. AGENCIES CONTACTED BY FEDERAL WAY As part of the review conducted by Federal Way staff, site visits were conducted and the proposal was circulated to the following agencies and city departments: * Federal Way Parks & Human Resources Division. * Federal Way Public Works Divisions. * Federal Way Building Department. * King County Fire District #39. * Federal Way Water and Sewer District. Responses from the Federal Way Water and Sewer District, King County Fire District #39, Department of Public Works, Federal Way Building Department, and King County/Federal Way Police were reviewed and used to develop SEPA conditions and to address site design issues. VI. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 1. Topography: The site contains slopes ranging from less than 2 percent to 27 3 percent. 2. Soils: The area contains EwC, Everett-Alderwood gravelly sandy loam soils which generally range from 6-15 percent in slope. Runoff is slow to medium, and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate. Any erosion-related impacts during clearing and construction activities must be performed in accordance with a Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan to be reviewed and approved by the City of Federal Way. 3. Hydrography: A Level I - Downstream Analysis, was prepared for the site by ESM, Inc., dated March 1993 (Exhibit F). According to the report, a closed drainage system is proposed which will connect into the existing stormwater system located in South 334th Street. Lake #3 serves as a retention/detention system for this area of West Campus. ESM does not feel the development will have a negative impact on Lake #3 or structures surrounding the lake. Although the analysis indicates that Lake #3 may have capacity to handle post development runoff from the Paragon site, Lake #3 drains into Lakes #1 and #6 which have insufficient stormwater capacity. SEPA mitigation measures were required to address this issue. In response to comments received from the Department of Public Works, ESM, Inc. also prepared a review of the seven (7) core and twelve (12) special requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) (Exhibit G). Issues which must be addressed within this review include: discharging of surface water, off-site drainage analysis, runoff control, type of conveyance system, and special water quality controls. Implementation of SEPA mitigation measure #1 and code requirements will ensure proper drainage for the site. 4. Vegetation: The site is moderately to heavily wooded with a second and third- growth mixture of coniferous and broad-leafed trees native to the Pacific Northwest. The dominant tree is the Douglas Fir. Second-story vegetation and groundcover consists of Northwest native species including salal, sword fern, berry vines and grasses. 5. Wildlife: Birds and small animals inhabit the subject site; however, their population and species are limited due to the surrounding development. These birds and animals may be displaced by the proposal. 6. Sensitive Areas: Sensitive areas were not identified on the site. 4 VII. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS The property is located in an urbanized neighborhood. Urban utilities and services are nearby to service the site. Current uses of the site and surrounding area include the following: Site: Undeveloped. North: Office. South: Office. East: Office. West: Office. VIII. GENERAL DESIGN The site and landscape plans, as depicted, will meet design requirements related to facade modulation and landscaping. However, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1441(a), wherever feasible, building(s) should be located between the street and the parking area. The plan does not meet this guideline. A letter from George Sherwin, Vice President of the Quadrant Corporation (Exhibit H) addresses Section 22-1441(a). The letter requests that the building not be located between proposed parking and the existing street, and states that, "design criteria and site characteristics demonstrate that it is neither feasible or practical to meet the separation requirement." The letter also includes seven reasons supporting this statement. Upon review of the site plan and the applicant's rationale as to why the building should not be located between the street and parking, the Director of Community Development has determined that the request be granted. Revised site plans or related information could result in a change to this determination. IX. TRANSPORTATION Traffic Generation: A Traffic Impact Analysis for Paragon Trade Brands Facility was prepared by the Transpo Group in May 3, 1993 (Exhibit I). The total number of vehicle trips per day will be 1,140. After review of this analysis, the Federal Way Traffic Analyst requested the Transpo Group to submit additional information related to accidents, peak hour factor, level of service calculations for certain intersections, signal warrants, and pro-rata share contributions. A response to these issues was submitted on October 14, 1993 to the City's Department of Public Works (Exhibit J). Although this project will not create the need to construct new roadways or traffic safety items, traffic generated from the proposed development will impact roadways and intersections in the general vicinity of the site which are scheduled for improvements. 5 It was determined that pro-rata share contributions shall be imposed to mitigate impacts at four locations (see SEPA condition #2 under Section IV). X. PUBLIC SERVICES Parks and Open Space: The City of Federal Way is proposing to create a Trail Corridor within the Bonneville Power Administration and Tacoma Public Utilities, approximately 300 feet to the north. A proposed eighty-acre Celebration Park is located approximately 600 feet to the east. These recreational facilities will eventually be available to employees of the proposed project. XI. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Comprehensive Plans: The application is governed by the interim 1990 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan which designates this area as Industrial/Office Park. The proposal complies with several of the comprehensive plan policies in the following ways: Policy C-21 - Sidewalks will be located along all street frontages for improved pedestrian circulation. Internal sidewalks will connect the building to sidewalks along each street and to parking areas. Policy C-24 - Proposed open space (landscaping) will exceed 10 percent of the site area. Policy T-3 - The City of Federal Way requires employers with 100 or more employees to implement trip reduction measures. Policy T-5 - The development will enter their property from local access streets. Policy T-11 - Mitigation of direct transportation impacts created by the new development has been imposed as part of the SEPA process. Policy NE-6 - A Temporary Erosion Sedimentation Control (TESC) Plan will be required during construction. XII. STATUTES/CODES If approved, the proposed development will comply with the requirements of the Federal Way City Code and other City, State and Federal regulations. See attached letter to George Sherwin granting site plan approval and Findings for Site Plan Approval used to 6 support the decision (Exhibit K). XIII. CONCLUSIONS The proposed Paragon Office and Research Facility will comply with the goals and objectives of the interim 1990 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, FWCC and other City regulations. XIV. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the application of Paragon Office and Research Facility be granted approval subject to conditions of the SEPA determination issued November 16, 1993. Transmitted to parties listed hereafter: * Federal Way Hearing Examiner * George F. Sherwin, Jr. Vice President The Quadrant Corporation P.O. Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 I:\paragon\upr93007.rpt 7 —yam h p --grin Tr ii- _ Y I d.• : „ o 0 _ r: I A r . n;. SITE — —I: :. rd TREET a 1r f r 7,.. ir . .9F; IIN ''!IRV . _ __ A. .41 w I ,�KITTS ,.- _ !_= PItrG �1P \ • \ Wa ': A• F E I ERAL w IRNER R �G - r \ "i �. ;ems, ) ;` ^s/� fi ,Iti� _ ! v' --JS -- 33 --Zy���_- * _-` Jay • '�' !1 '�. ,! I �-'(d� i HE; � / i^,� .' - I am, rip - ll.�_\- '_1__., t. L., . 1 j,..-: .: P ���-I F37 uIJa, II4Dt 1. - VICINITY MAP ,ii'":b/ 1.. IF ua�ao Ni FLi:Tu� . .\ p � .a.G, ►-a..n"Ia. -* ),./‘ ' I I 3., ':.0 ' ...'. -C7f' {".; - i '`i; ': . 1 ._ l 11 - :if@tisi�7®IIi9�i@�S. a- ®I� � .: ' .r 1st f LU6 0 i >•. L = l 336 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 'r ,�:'"i IS' 3p + H + Y I \ E Ir Z i {s.'ll� _ La 28: - .n J4 / i �Ctv, y'1 •• :'� - / f I I �L°iOIM TOGETHER WITH that portion o/Lot 27,tying northeasterly of .; i ; _ >w Q a fine described as follows: i - _ .•' ✓- _ + I tl i r \ BEGINNING a the most northerly corner of Lot 27; 1 1 / .•�► ---,..../ I 1.:i III ,e B ._ - I I �„/ �' THENCE S 5J58'39' W.23.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF � - r YI ` I . : .� _. rr BEGINNING of mid Gm: ' a.r THENCE S 3ti 5t'4g E.to a Paint on the southeasterly / L5' 1(/'(•;2eS `I(pt - l z ,®2a� - 1 -- hne --- THENCE 19.2 feet southwesterly a the easterly • % _1,. da s-• Q' / \ I 9R UC:' 14111 comer o/sold Lot AND the terminus a said line; • I _ I / / - } k •+,�- n 1 •..I T� r� i '.•f - ! i - - _ '1I ! V1 r-7 ALSO TOGETHER WITH Lots 29.30 and 31; al ALSO TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lot 32.lying F�I 1 -�+k -• _ 4 , a 1 6 J:•:_�f I ' I ! f I d4 northeasterly or the following described Gne: 1 , • .. .. - -�,- Z 4.1 BEGINNING a the most southerly corner Of said Lot 32: - I put-inure .1v - Lf'.'Y. I /., .-/ - .- ; i (.� THENCE N 51.30'00' E.214.26 test to the TRUE POINT _ — oecc-, ,'F�f,Z < _/Li I•• @ �P I- + L OF BEGINNING; - _ -�r I .(,• / - !/ —* 1 I 1 [� Lr-r THENCE N-3ti51'48" W.too pant on the northwesterly '� t7L7Gi ILG1J,,i J _ / `�' - �i� I• I • M^ -c- line of said Lot 32. 19.2 feet southwesterly 4arr1 the b 1 •I' ' it` F`'� a {t=- I ru ru QQ most northerly corner of said Lot 32 AND the tar,anls o / / ,:�� - G' 42." tJ/GtL czsl.lG. _ "•l,- i,. /t"r N •-t I slni .I1� a said lee: `i► i s?e. 1eLL-- 2 TOR . ' f�Ifd - 4 '�' W O �I ALL 'West Campus Office Pork Division ,',according to ., -- ,'Ij \ ' the in thereof d recorded Vavnt 97 of Pats,Pages ss i i`--B ~X- sR.ER�' �I !OFFICE. BU DI/ aC _� I \\ , � L\\\\\a'e e�,kw.`, 1 1 , I E'» W through 58.Records d d^9 County.Washington. ,, CgJG. P1a� - . Q Q. Situate in the Countyof Keg.State of Washington. 7 x i.• =� 11 i if,E.EY. •61 / III /� ;:. �� I '^ `j C4 M, �_^ I I \V.�\\2,ill III•_ ./ LJJz E�, Z E f•'�'1 " ph ! I ' ,1 '.1 Q• •It': +,; . i :' 7=+1 co 1 PROJECT STATISTICS '�ti 1 -_. • N *NI ,,-. 1, -2s. ,F,-::; , : 1 L., ..e,;,4 aloe Area: 5.80 Aces 252,810 Sq.Ft - _ . le _ ' an 12 Building Area: .} t r.. iBs ��,p��p�'/ _. ` ��@ ,, J will J� I t First Floor 44.554 Sq.FL - . -- �$� { I 1 r t I Second Floor 42.02319..O. - ''" I _-'�e>sb��t-`� ,e Rt1'Rfg , 1 lif P'..1 88,183Sq.FL Gross I I I _ .. . -.a�.• tre'��{�ap,I�'9C t•1. ePankingRpuind: j 't• I ,ii t i ttn lv.-L��24G—�. i/ - - CD I+ • _ 1 'C \j1 /' r Office Use trlOD Sq.Ft. 68,569 Sq.Ft.13f10 S9.FL= 229 Stab 1' �s Whx.Use 1/1000 Sq.Ft. 19,811 Sq.FL/1000 5q.FL= N e QfF+t 7'JT�Ilc f "" ' + /-. -" , . .1 j t • 249 Stab ,�.� - .,, 91?L-t el -� �', ;f F/ 1 I ' - _; III���"'777 I. ! \ �_ mot. . ;5 - Parking Provided: I _\I 1 I ,.�. , I _ ` { y, - O Standard Stan 207 SONS 78% �: '+3" d +- � ! ; - - tD T Compact Stan 53 Stalls 20% •1£ �_• 3_9A -�� �:. -•iw' IZI ` I .I r b el I H.C.StaN 7 sloe: 2% �� =EI A- ' I/ Van Stall 1 StaB ' 6. - ,� - Ili - _ _ /I a 10 267 Stalls •18 rubes,Stalls 8 Required _ III G o �0 4C l�F's!L -, lb _ 07 R�2r•t�. `• i 1 � .1 Zoning: OP Office Park _ _ ._.._,— -'Ars 532 W ; 203 s -m 1�• -!' I y Codes: 1991 UBC tWIN Federal Way Zoning -- =�' .- •- N Construction Type:V-N Fin Sprinklsrad :5,... - Building/Land X: 88.180 Sq.FLR52,8d0 Sq.Ft.34.90% i .. v�4 - �- - Pervlou,Area: 92.964 Sq.Ft. -- ---_---- - _ .- STfTE E i'' _ Impervious Area: 159.676 Sq.Ft. A • ,- - 1 . I CO a a cA. - fl r I"� 1.1 NI e y QI General Noes: - .•.. 1 - _ _ __ 1. Architectural site plan for she layout,parldrq,cunbs,,idewaaa and striping only .- �--- ..- Gr.d'ny information lsconceptual only. / - , j, i Lea � 2. See drawings prepared by E.S.M.for Site eroding,stone drainage and utilities. - .. l�2 M • 3. See drawings prepared by Ken Loney 8 Assoc+ates for landscaping and imgation. .. : - '- 3 w coW . Orawkgs indicate existing trees to be retained and significant tress per Federal Way - • .- g zoning requirements. • U /y\ SITE PLAN �� 1 f-1 I 1 Cm 0 ,EXHIBIT .A. VICINITY MAP ��AA PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH. —I MIRROR f o to i J S 313TH ST _ d t L , co LAKE 313 H��' I 'r,3`gtN x 313TH r y 99 4 f1 x g ST a „�h S x j y� o! v ¢cn z `�� S 314TH 1' ; ST y 4�4y¢ o oa f , 316TH ST S 315TH Cpp Q ¢ S cl ¢ > lu� 3157H N • I316TH < PL PL .r MIR••s,! ST CrT`' R" a LN' to S316THSW ,_ 0S 316TH PL m A4.r°' sT S3167HS7zaly�(,, ,t�Q��a 317TH PL ` 6-1 •. S 317TH ST N , N a¢ ,Y m 1 6 5` j I ®C�® Q 96 N� N 0 318TH Q. SW 319TH LN S 317TH, Nl PL S 3 •TH > 0 a • SC r I Ov ST $ 2 M ? o4. . ;i a A x r r Tn o ,� Q Z Er PL x P , S3\ = S 318TH E 319TH P,`l 320TH SW 320 Z •> z "' LIB PA!may S 320TH ST = VILLAGE Co c et'. I ¢ ■ > =1 ¢>i 321S .7 a CC H■ v' N y yi r S7 a S 5 SW kY 32 4° ST : .t.Q ,- 0 '322N. PL - co r • S321SrPL m� 0" a' 0-�� ' 3,9 a N .... sty323g0 SW 324TH ¢ co SA ���3245 -'0 DEPTOF SEA TAG MALL ST TN a x 42 TH 322 ND SW S a S J S 325TH ST PL A LICENSINGF.'s's. 4.• \N ?Spy Cr S 32,co 0. S 325TH., = 3 P LD 326SH ST .., N Z x , S 324TH j64, N R PARK IDE 19 1 J� QLp ��N 3? `' 6p Spy yL k Q S 324TH Q��`� SWINGED FOOT WY y � ST N omS r y .o d, S 325T ST PL 0 EMINOL ' 327THp 32STmS , !� yc coo i � L Ft_ S34 Spya 'C( r?.G1 "MER/LN 2m 3�tt\ ¢> r "3,, lip ( 32 2�� HERHB ON atu • /� sr 3T�2 H P �' ly�� S S 327TH S ' �.�����i4iC/(Atm�` S �JW/ H¢r� sr i= ii:���l �-�5� 3J2MnN 93 OJ COLONIALBL �O 2SW ti A SW331STPLw ¢ 2 ` Q i v S� \, + co... WA (n J 33-ND ,yamStk3^ h S 330TH ST`tn N < >o¢ 3RD CT q�Pp�,�� 9�p� S� I_ N N¢ Q.Jy�'Q THCT aor 2Np Qs' Co ,p \may S�Pp �/ e� S 332ND - ST ^.-'-' S331STST a •y N ZP ti r ti= (0 . �e\. 9 \ IqL S331 �332ND r'v' < �� ' v Lip \d' S 99� • `P �rQ col S LN sr $j `V¢ Stu \ y o,� °D SW 335 HST 'g F sW - \�S'( Ely ii 4 v 0, 0., sr Z S S3: S > <I .« y F } A = y� \C\ • Sp SITE I = s = r i t] V.t CT S_W.y L oo-�Q S,Sr5Sp e •••• 110 G o./ '336TH i ST co Sty 336TH N I N U ��fo�� ht• 37TH,•cP Z ST S 336TH PL '! tk co �lc. '` S 338TH PL S3 9TH CIR u' �``,_ S 338TH ST •• O S 1ST CIRS o - CORNER °q°$ • l x d'4 • SQL stli ue, �V S340ST m EYERHAEUS 5t KI • .• S34\SZP� `yam PO ¢ S340TH 2� S3a1S7 PL = EADQUARTER AQUATIC CENTER pQ\ N s' • cI— � S3A2C\ . Si S 344TH343 ST = S (.1 > S � ~ `�' CI XI x SW 345TH A ST N 346 '' .,,,4 < ��Q�Qpy rn S 346TH ST CO > ST.FRANCIS `" w �� ST3 s/yyy� SW - (�` HOSPITAL ¢ _ ¢ 3 �j v = ti 4J�, u�ST H • 1 m ^ QS.. 1--- rallibisio. y� Wy7Q Z La S 348TH ST _ y'SA1 S 347TH PL t= irtillj i- ` ++ ¢ J \ PARK RIDE S350TH x i /— i. T i ST 4ca N1 I S� _ cc _ '349T ST >- /S S351STST CY ¢ > > w Vn to 3 353• e j1 y 't: \ _ .S. F S 3' I' S 361 S ST 353RD S aI T}I= Yf E D' ^ \ > 352NDD S V �' 4, / 17 Z S 352N ST y 6� r� 2 (7 �. � > SW \\ � ek 4 ,ds 2 3 a 3 ¢ ' 9"�eK' ` y ti',3 S 5',g000' NS \so 0)355TH z 11-E ` Z .o ¢ PL w S \ 1 Sp m =��=4r�x FNL S 354T :,H P`� - 3 S 357TH Sri 3'S6T p St! N Q�v a�v < LN 3 < rn o ! L NI I > > / �i S355THST TT a o¢ ¢ ! S 3 567H ST C) ,z;r I 1161 (� N 1 i r S 358TH0 I ) n Q zl S ^ N a�r T - I. r. 11110 E) IBIT WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF PAGE, OF Natural Resources v JENNIFER M.BELCHER COM19UnnrY`c jt Commissioner of Public Lands KALEEN COTTINGHAM Supervi.r DATE: November 22, 1993 r 2 3 1993 Nr / %t( Kenneth E. Nyberg Asst. City Manager/Director of Community Development TO: City of Federal Way ►"' 33530 First Way South 7 Federal Way, WA 98003 FROM: Ben R. Cleveland Resource Protection Specialist South Puget Sound Region SUBJECT: REVIEW OF Paragon Office and Research Facility File No. SEP93-0009/VPR93-0007 ACTION SPONSOR Quadrant Corporation PROJECT Construct office and research facility on 5.8 acres We do not have an interest in the above project and have no comments on the proposal . X We do have an interest in the above project and wish to make the following comments: A *forest practice permit will be required for the harvest of timber associated with this project. 09ffint.for cc: Dave Dietzman - SEPA Center - Lands and Minerals SOUTH PUGET SOUND REGION 128329 SE 448 ST I PO BOX 68 I ENUMCLAW,WA 98022-0068 ®rtioiptp18 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer recycled paper 0 0.6 • �:;::: `:;z PAGE ' 9y 1889 DEC 1 1993 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. BOX 47600 • Olympia, Washington 98.504-7600 • (206)459-6000 November 29 , 1993 Mr. Kenneth E. Nyberg City of Federal Way 33530 First Way S Federal Way WA 98003 Dear Mr. Nyberg: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the construction of a office and research facility proposed by the Quadrant Corporation (#SEP93-0009) . We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. Under Item B. 1 . e of the checklist, the proponent has failed to indicate the source of fill to be used. The use of fill material meeting the definition of demolition waste, inert waste, or wood waste as defined in WAC 173-304-100 may require a solid waste permit from the local health department. Such materials include, but are not limited to, concrete, asphalt, wood, and stumpage. Fill materials, such as clean soil and gravel, are exempt from the permit requirements of Chapter 173-304 WAC. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Peggy Williams with our Solid Waste Services Program at (206) 649-7034 . Sincerely, Rhe-Ca Rebecca J. Inman Environmental Review Section RI: 93-8321 cc: Janet Thompson, NWRO Peggy Williams, NWRO ®‹A 18 i4t n4reR1ETR0 �•:HIBIT FMunicipality of Metropolitan Seattle • Environmental Planning an Eto D Sion 4 -Z. 821 Second Ave.,M.S. 120 • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 • (206)684-1165 • Fax (206)—684 1900 L,r December 1, 1993 '! �p[POthF COtti Fu�IiSY Qc\'LC) t. pE-C 3. 1993 Mr. Kenneth E. Nyberg Director of Community Development City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Subject: Paragon Office and Research Facility File No. SEP93-0009 Dear Mr. Nyberg: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and we have the following comments regarding public transportation services. Public Transportation Services Metro staff recommends the above referenced project be required to have a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) that includes the following actions. Employee Transportation Services - Appoint a Transportation Coordinator to promote and coordinate the use of public transportation and high occupancy vehicles. - Initiate an alternative work hour program. - Design and implement a guaranteed ride home program. Subsidies - Provide a free one-month bus pass to employees at the time of each new tenant occupancy (peak hour, two zones) . Information and Promotions - Distribute site-appropriate transit and ridesharing information to new employees and annually to all employees. Site Design - Develop a site plan that shows how access to transit and ridesharing have been considered. Recycled paper IBi E PAGE OF C. - Provide lighted and hard-surfaced sidewalks or pedestrian pathways to facilitate safe and convenient access to transit or rideshare service locations. - Provide secure bicycle parking. - Conduct transportation surveys/monitoring. For further information contact Pam Woo, Metro Market Development, at 684-1767 . Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Sincerely, Katherine McKee, Asst. Environmental Planner Environmental Planning and Real Estate Division Exhibit F Level I - Downstream Analysis, prepared by ESM, Inc. , dated March 1993. (In project file) • Exhibit G A review of the seven (7) core and twelve (12) special requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), dated 9/22/1993. (In project file) F®/ • QUADRANT PAG OOF N.E.8th at 112th A Weyerhaeuser Company P.O.Box 130 Bellevue,Washington 98009 Tel(206)455 2900 Fax(206)646 8300 September 23, 1993 TPA T Mr. Stephen Clifton SE P Z 7 1993 Senior Planner CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Building and Parking Location at Paragon, Inc. Corporate Headquarters Dear Mr. Clifton: This letter is written to document compliance with the intent of Section 22-1441(a), which states that, "Wherever feasible, the buildings on the subject property should be located between the street and the parking area". The Paragon site design criteria and site characteristics as discussed below demonstrate that it is neither feasible or practical to meet the criteria and that the site design does meet the goals of providing convenient pedestrian access to adjacent streets, along with the avoidance of large, unsightly parking areas from street frontages. The facts are as follows: 1. Notwithstanding compliance with 22-1441(a), please be advised that the specific special regulations of the OP Zone (Sec. 22-826), Special Regulation 3, provides that the first 25 feet of setback must be in landscaping, and the second 25 feet may be "parking and driving areas". This criteria is met. 2. The building has been designed and located to provide a campus setting, maximizing retention of existing trees and screening from adjacent roadways. With the site being surrounded by streets on three sides, the concept of locating the building between streets and parking areas is illogical and unfeasible, with the only non-street property line being at the rear of the building in the loading dock area. Driving lanes with adjacent parking and pedestrian facilities are required around the building to provide convenient automotive and emergency equipment access. 3. In order to minimize and balance the grading of the site, thereby allowing maximum retention of significant trees and existing vegetation, the building has been sited at the location and at a floor elevation which will achieve this goal. Moving the building toward 8th Avenue South, which is the front entrance of the building, would significantly increase grading and steepen driveway and pedestrian slopes into the property, causing far greater site disturbance inconsistent with best utilization of the property. • DOIBIT E. Mr. Stephen Clifton PAGE p Qf�, � September 23, 1993 Page 2 4. A double row of parking along 8th Avenue South adjacent to the front entrance is critical to Paragon, Inc., as this is a high security facility with controlled entrances. Visitors and employees will primarily enter through the secure front entrance. Redistribution of parking away from the front entrance would make parking less convenient and defeat this purpose, inconsistent with corporate goals. 5. The extensive site landscaping on all perimeter streets and the one interior property line will ensure the visual compatibility of parking areas from both off-site and on-site views. 6. It is important that parking areas be kept to a minimum in the loading dock and truck access area to avoid conflicts between cars, trucks and pedestrians. The site plan minimizes parking in this area. There is adequate parking on site to meet the requirements of Paragon and they believe parking in this area will have limited use consistent with this goal. It is not acceptable to place additional parking in this area by relocation of the building. 7. Fire Department criteria stipulate a maximum 12% grade on access drives. Locating the building toward 8th Avenue South, while still attempting to minimize grading on the site for tree protection and balance of slopes would make the front entry inconsistent with this requirement. It would also significantly steepen pedestrian access from the street to the main entrance. • We believe these issues clearly demonstrate that it is neither feasible, practical or acceptable to relocate the building between the street(s) and parking areas, and that both the public interest and interest of this corporate user are served by the design as presented. Sincerely, THE QUADRANT CORPORA ION George F. Sherwin, Jr. OPP" Vice President GFS:ri • Exhibit I Traffic Impact Analysis for Paragon Trade Brands Facility, prepared by the Transpo Group, dated 5/3/1993. (In project file) ext,LInunu rawc .. FROM: ,e A.gills' ty TG: -EXHIBIT SUBJECT: PARAGON TRADE BRANDS RESEARCH FACILITY RESPONSE TO CITY OF FEDERAL WAY OOMMEN RAG E OF 3 The City of>rederal Way has reviewed the traffic impact analysis for the Paragon Trade Brands Research Facility. Their review comments Ctrs presented In a memorandum dated October 4. 1999 from Jim Soiaegui,the cis Traffic Analyst,to Ron Darrow.Senior Development L meal". These comments related W the accident analysis,level of service calculatiena,request for additional analysis,and the pro-rata Share contribution. TRANSPO's roepvrises to these comments are summarized below. Aetddaists. This comment suggested that the number of accidents at the s 348th 9t reet/$R 99 Intersection seemed low in comparison to another analysis the city had received for the Home Depot project. We agree that ow'analyeie may have underestimated the number of"intersection-related"accidents since accidents occurring at the driveways To the retail centers in the vicinity of the Intersection were not included in the analysis. As indicated in the review comments from Federal Way the cengcsttaa at SR 348th Street/ 9R 99 would t ontriute to intersection-related emaid&at a distance further from the intersection and at the driveways. including this loner Inpact area would result in a higher number of accidents than reported in rice Paragoci'Iresude Brands cable study. However.the increase in the number of accidents would not change the conclusions in our report. Peak mew Factor. The mews indicated that to calculate level of service we applied a generic peak hour factor(P13171 of 0,94 each study area Snteraeaiiarl approach. We did apply one intersection PMP to each approach;however,the PHF was caleulared separately for each study area intersection based on the mating PM peak hour turning movement count data. Applying the PHF to each approach. as suggested by the city.does not accurately reflect actual intersection operations_.This is because if the PRF per approach is used,the level of setvfoe calculation simulates a condiliorie where the peek 15-minute periods for each approach would occur shmultaheeusly. However,this condition rarely occurs. By plying the overall intersection PR!.the level of service model simulates the actual peak 15.minute period. Therefore,the meduaiologyr we applied in the traffic Impact analyze is accurate and no revisions are needed. The TRAMP()Group,Inc. 141335 N.E.24th Street Svi:a 201 5*rm&Wishingten 90107 fAX:20617474838 20b/G41-3861 10/16(93 06;07 FAX 206 646 6J00 QL`ADRAIVT cuRP aQ1002 _ 18-14-1993 021lEPM The TRgNSPU Greup .-206 747 3698 P.23 EXHIBIT • zzg�ee Sherwin PA G October 14, 199S OF Page 2 bra air.00/4,$4ith Street.8R I'81/S 848th Strwt. In the memo.the City requests the complete hovel of service Calculation sheets for SR 99/3 348th Street and SR 161/3 348th Street Both intersection calculation sheets are attached for existtag.it tore-without• project and future-with-project conditions. The C5 ,iwtinns far the 3R 161/S 346th Street lnterseotton Included the improvements on SR 161 that have recently been completed. In addition,the phasing stud timing were based on the WSDOT timing cards for these intersection. $385sd Street/tat Avenue S. The memo points out that the reserve capae at the S 333rd Street/1st Avenue S tnttirsect1on increases from 8 vehicles for the without-project condition to 12 vehicles for the with-project condition. The reported 12 vehictei is a typo; the actual reserve eapeeity is 7 vehicles. This error would not charge the recommended mitigation for this intersection, Signal Warrant In the memo.the City requests the documentation to support the recommendation for a+signal at the S 333rd Street/1st Avenue'Intersection. We nave attached the calculation for signal Warrant 11.Peak Hole volume. As indurated In the traffic study for the project,we determined that this Intersection would>ncet Warrant 11 for the esleting.withheut-project and with.project conditions. Based on the sopping sheet for the proposed project.it was our understanding that e�tlon was planned for this ns intersectio when It met warrant. It is i rtant to note the calculations for Warrant 11 include the highest approach volutes ftom the mined kg.s 333rd Street. Seer the sacking and Ititure conditions,the west leg had the highest approach volume;all project trips Impact the east leg of this interseetion. Ip addltIOn to request for demarientation of the warrant analysis,the City requested that a. more detailed COMparlson between the project impacts and the safety issues at this intersection be Included. The accident history from January 1890 to dune 1992,indicates that the accident experience at this Intersection is low-approximatelyone reported accident per year. In general,the ewer*of conflicts at intersections are usually due to left turns from the minor streets which conflict with the mail street traffic from both directions. The proposed project would contribute four srauthbound left trips from the msear street. let Way 6.to the east leg of the minor street.S 333rd Street,and westbo nd right turns from S 333rd Street. Neither mo'vemetlt would likely cause any unusualhalal-de at this location. Ire-Rats Share CentrlbutiCii. Several revision*to the pro-rata ehar'e contribution were auggeated Sn the memo. The Est revision 1s for the 16th Averau.$roadway widening project from SR 18 to SR 99. This project has been Completed and the City be requesting contributions from the project proponent. In addition,it was suggested that the percentage impact far the S 338th Street/SR 99 project and the 1st Avenue S widening from 3 820t'h Street to S 316th be recalculated to include only those locations at the intersections which are to be unproved. At the 336th Street/SR 99 intervectlon,the percentage impact should be applied only to the unprovemennte costs en the vet leaf of the Intersection wtaieh is impacted by project trips. There are no project trips on the east leg of this intersection. tuiiniaa vn:un rw,t zuu +u nsuu ktUdl�!(Pil41 �uxr 4Juua 10-14-1993 021iSPM ine TRANSPO 3raup _.206 747 3613E3 P.34 •r • • EXHIBI October PAGE OF_. p et 14, f 99S age 3 Gimp For the$0S3rd Street/1st Way S aiignal12ation the percent impaCt Is based on the total number of project trips entering the intereectio�il compared to the total future with project tragic volurnps. As stated previously. � the ei i is warranted both with and without the pproject therefore.it is reasonable to base the project impact compares to the entire The pro-rata where contributions have boon revised based on the Federal Way comments and are shown below. Tebt Plo Rata Share Centt(butione M�k How Percentage TIP p No. Laca*on Descripllyn Yoh__ Total Traffic Total B S 341111 St(1-5 to SR 99) Realign roadway:NOV lane; 481 3.347 1.4% 17 S 33Elth St at SR 99 Widen to five rams,sigma motifs a- 45 2230 2.0% lion,pedestrian end bike fettle, 20 1stAv.S Milan to five lanes,ontri,t 8 1,7113 0.5% (S$20tfi St to S 31 WI St) pedestan and bile tadlkfes Net S 333rd St/i Ft Wy 5 Signalize, 26 2,249 1.2% fasted 1 Moe volumes reprrstni the avvrlgo number of Mel trips-andmkt oleo on S 34ath sleets-from 1.6 to SR 99. We trust that the information provided herein adequately addressee the�y�e commence Please call me or Marna trieirron in our°Mee if you have further questions. LIAB\jab\mah Attachment* °c Jini Solaegui,City of Federal Way was as-ele ds • CITY OF G E y HIBIT • L"] , ._ E FrY") 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH PAGE (A9�'K • S Mr. George F. Sherwin, Jr., Vice President December 20, 1993 The Quadrant Corporation PO Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 RE: Paragon Office and Research Facility -File No.'s SPR93-0016 and UPR93-0007 Dear Mr. Sherwin: The city has completed its administrative review of your proposed 88,130 square foot, two story office and research facility for Paragon Trade Brands, Inc., located at 750 South 334th Street in the City of Federal Way. The site plan has been administratively approved per the Findings For Site Plan Approval (enclosed) and subject to the following condition: 1. Pursuant to section 18-78 of the Environmental Protection Ordinance, all mitigation measures of the April 18, 1993, determination of nonsignificance are incorporated by reference as conditions of this approval. Failure to comply with the mitigation measures shall constitute grounds for suspension and/or revocation of this approval. This application is now being forwarded to the city's Hearing Examiner and City Council for final action. A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, January 4, at 3 p.m., for the Hearing Examiner's review of the proposal. Undgr Process III review, the proposed development requires final approval by the City Council. Thefefore, this administrative decision will form the basis for a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. This administrative decision is required by the Federal Way City Code to be incorporated into the staff report prepared for Hearing Examiner and City Council review. It does not grant license to begin any type of site work. This administrative decision may be appealed by filing a written letter of appeal with the Department of Community Development no later than 5 p.m., Tuesday, December 30, 1993. In addition, you may request reconsideration of this decision by filing a written request with the Department of Community Development no later than 5 p.m., Tuesday, December 23, 1993. If you have any questions, please call Stephen Clifton (Senior Planner) at 661-4109. Si ely, Gr gorj . re, AICP Actin/ o nity Development Services Director enc: Findings for Site Plan Approval c: Stephen Clifton, Senior Planner 1\...paragon\upr93007.epr CITY OF = EXr-iiBT • PAGE OF FEY 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH DERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 FINDINGS FOR SUE PLAN APPROVAL Application No. UPR93-0016 December 10, 1993 Paragon Office and Research Facility The following are findings for recommending Site Plan approval of an 88,130 square foot, two story office and research facility for Paragon Trade Brands, Inc., located at 750 South 334th Street in the City of Federal Way. FINDINGS 1. The site is currently zoned OP, Office Park. 2. The site is designated as Industrial/Office Park by the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed use is permitted in the OP district subject to Use Process III and Site Plan approval. 4. The site is currently undeveloped. The property is located in an urbanized neighborhood. Urban utilities and services are nearby to service the site. Current uses of the site and surrounding area include the following: Site: Undeveloped North: Office South: Office East: Office West: Office 5. Access is proposed at four locations. One along South 333rd Street, two along 334th Street, and one along 8th Avenue South. The proposed site plan was reviewed to ensure optimal location and configuration of access to the subject property. 6. The site contains slopes ranging from less than 2 percent to 27 percent. 7. The site is moderately to heavily wooded with a second and third-growth mixture of coniferous and broad-leafed trees native to the Pacific Northwest. The dominant tree is the Douglas Fir. Second-story vegetation and groundcover consists of Northwest native species including salal, sword fern, berry vines, and grasses. Findings ... Paragon Office & Research Facility E OF eir PAGE December 10, 1993 Page 2 8. No environmentally sensitive areas have been identified on-site. 9. A mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued for this proposed action on November 16, 1993. The comment and appeal period for this determination was completed on December 15, 1993. 10. Preliminary earthwork calculations include approximately 18,000 cubic yards of cut and 20,000 cubic yards of fill. Thus, a net gain of 2,000 cubic yards of fill will be brought on-site. 11. A traffic impact analysis and supplemental information provided by the consultant for the Paragon Trade Brands Facility, has been used to identify impacts to the street system in the general vicinity of the project. The total number of vehicle trips per day will be 1,140. It has been determined that pro-rata share contributions shall be imposed to mitigate impacts at four locations (see SEPA conditions). 12. Runoff from the site shall be controlled by the use of on-site detention per the King County Surface Design Manual (KCSWDM) and recommendation BW-2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan, unless additional regional detention is developed in Lake No. 1 as currently proposed by the Quadrant Corporation. 13. " Water and sewer facilities are available to the site and adequate to serve the proposed development. 14. The proposal embodies good design principals that will be compatible with the developing character of this area of the community. 15. The site and landscape plans, as depicted, will meet design requirements related to facade modulation and landscaping. However, pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1441(a), wherever feasible, building(s) should be located between the street and the parking area. The plan does not meet this guideline. A letter from George Sherwin, Vice President of the Quadrant Corporation, addresses Section 22-1441(a). The Director of Community Development has determined that the design criteria and site characteristics demonstrate that it is neither feasible or practical to meet the separation requirement. Upon review of the site plan and the applicant's rationale as to why the building should not be located between the street and parking, the Director of Community Development has determined that the request be granted. EXHIBIT Findings ... Paragon Office & Research Facility December 10, 1993 PAGE 4 OF Page 3 16. The proposed site plan, application, and application attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, pertinent zoning regulations, and all other applicable city regulations. As designed, the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will be required to comply with all applicable codes and regulations. 17. Development of the site in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and all applicable development codes and regulations will ensure that the interest of the public's health, safety, and welfare is protected. 18. The proposed development is consistent with decisional criteria required under Section 22-490(d) of the FWCC. Prepared by: Stephen Clifton, AICP, Senior Planner Date: December 10, 1993 iAparagon*duds { Wit, e �. .�`i' .w: „{ fir.. ., 'r>' � _ � - _ • CITY Of ty t '' ` r 0 _ - .r1EJfzR1_. Ry DEPARTMENT.OF.CO DEVELOPMENT MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION 1 w ' APPLICATION NO r ti • -�0. 7 Date'-'-''-:- - • r. z r+, ..:. t`4c s s -�b awn .+. . c. +rc�w✓ey a ."-ft. �' ..2'.'• t a 6 a Agent ,Name�'of'App . emu . rpe _. - - • '"'-�_ an licant W .'The a ant''.� �at ion 'r__,, �• X . '' r'.� t , ' Address 4" s,� .�5. ,.. ,-Address:,,,,----,-,,,--.-.„. . . F 0 s,Bo��i3�.�-co �V��-980a9 - - r Owner 1 4 .," '' `� Phone 455 29. - ` J . Signature �> T yJ/)1 �� ,. �, r • • .. Property Location S 3 rd on.the 1lJE f 8th Ave.- St :on the NW,=S. 334th on the SE_ . c:.. .--w - .Y..- -- ..."X A - - . • Kroll Zone OP-` -Office Park 3: c 41, y- .'''' t•<x.r'"x;.E cr ✓-c :S ' ?a,t= -.-1 t : s r _ � Le al D -edition: •r See. ActacI-P---- '" - h, 't ` � 1 v;' fi4 • R' r i r .,,,, + # "-- Project Description 'N.';-;;-.,..;e po 1 Gh f38/130 ,-------_•,E twc 5--e -,- '1cL • PFrv11qVC . i Parcel Number(s): 28`,� 3O,•`31 (See map attached)1 -= 0�- : -750 -t#1 S . 1 Type Hof Permit Require• d. SEPA :� Notice• Sign 4 -� �; Checkhst , Mailed Board = £ = '�-;� Site Plan Review: R Y - - `� .C`° . � Land;Surface Modification R= R x Boundary Lu Adjustment - ' ��- -X " ~ { Binding Srte P1an`�' R 4 R -- Short�Subdtvision * 7' *= .; R R . � SubdivLsion - R:' • �: -; s Shoreline -' r r:.. R R. Variance R R Conditional Use R R R R Use - Process I R = h R =.Use Process II` ' R•` R f-•Use---Process liT` R R- R Quasi-judicial Rezo•ne R R R Variance R R Comp. Plan/Rezone R R . _ Annexation - R R. R = Required * Optional by City MASTER LA.FRM 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH • FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 • (206) 661-4000 Recycled Paper \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 28, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 27, LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 27; THENCE SOUTH 53°58'39" WEST 23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE SOUTH 36°51'48" EAST TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE LYING 19 .2 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; LOT 29, 30 AND LOT AND LOT 31 TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 32, LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 32; THENCE NORTH 51°30' 00" EAST, 214 .26 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36°51'48" WEST TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32, 19 .2 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY FROM THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 32 AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE, ALL IN WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIVISION 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 97 OF PLATS, PAGES 55 THROUGH 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • .F • ih‘‘ .40 !• W E SITE MAP ifilt(p. eile Is 4 •r r ..• X\ ._ \ •\ f,. //' 1 J \:\ . r 6/ l 0 ` e So „OS' . \ 1...'' yg'' f 29 .\\ J 19 •• 1 \ -- _ ''� 313• .O. 4 .r , \'•\ f J . .1.%,„ .•• •••\.% . 40 O ',• ' 28 k ., , \ �, LOT tos 5 - et,* 30 ram• �0• •,i'' N• % \ 2 %%. ......_ /7 *IP 27 •` • 4 c c ,• • f• . ' a•• V` $,. ' 1 26 G s4* '• • . 32 ',r. -1 Z `din • e NOTICE OF PUBLIC LAND USE HEARING PROPOSED PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH FACILITY Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City of Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner at 3:00 p.m. on January 4, 1994 in the Federal Way City Council Chambers, 33530 - 1st Way South, Federal Way, Washington 98003. FILE NUMBER: Federal Way File No. UPR93-0007 Related File No.'s SEP93-0009 and SPR93-0016 TOPIC: The proposal is to construct an 88,130 square foot, two story office and research facility on a 5.8 acre site for Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. Existing zoning for subject site is Office Park (OP). Access is proposed at four locations. One along South 333rd Street, two along South 334th Street, and one along 8th Avenue South. PROJECT LOCATION: 750 South 334th Street, between South 333rd and 334th Streets, and to the west of 8th Avenue South. APPLICANT: Randy Hamblin The Quadrant Corporation P.O. Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 Contact: George Sherwin (206) 455-2900 Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner, either by delivering these comments to the Department of Community Development prior to the hearing, or by giving them directly to the Hearing Examiner at the hearing; or by appearing in person, or through a representative, at the hearing, and presenting public testimony. The Hearing Examiner will make a recommendation on the application within ten working days after the close of the hearing. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. The application for subject proposal is to be reviewed under applicable codes, regulations and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours (8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.) in the Department of Community Development, 33530 1st Way South, Federal Way 98003. Staff reports will be available for review one week prior to the hearing. Any questions regarding this proposal should be directed to Stephen Clifton, Senior Planner at 661-4109. I:\paragon\upr93007.ntl Published in Federal Way News on December 21, 1993. �9 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION herebydeclare, under penalty P tY of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that: ❑ Notice of Public Hearing ❑ Determination of Non-Significance ❑ Notice of Public Meeting ❑ Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance ❑ Board of Adjustment Agenda ❑ Determination of Non-Significance Packet and Scoping Notice ❑ Planning Commission Agenda ❑ Notice of Action Packet. ❑ Short Subdivision Agenda ❑ Official Notice Packet -rr�E 0 (G LAN') N ❑ Notice of Application for • Other .)SE- 1-4F-A rz t L� Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Other � 1 was mailed/fax /posted` /at each of the following addresses (see attached list) on , 1993. F p_t i'GS ctJ �'FFic� ESEFC1-1 ��c� �i Pr Name of Project Signature File Number 1z93 -L C — Date I7-7`73 AmDA\7.Fp.m REVISED 1/10/92 I • The City of Feder gay posted the attached p_ .Jposal to the following locations: The Federal Way Regional Library 34200 1st Way South Federal Way, 98003 Federal Way Library. 848 South 320th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way City Hall (Bulliten Board) 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 AFFI' I VIT OF DISTRIB-T'ION I, --"?p�-�c hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that: E Notice of Public Hearing ❑ Determination of Non-Significance ❑ Notice of Public Meeting ❑ Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance ❑ Board of Adjustment Agenda ❑ Determination of Non-Significance Packet and Scoping Notice ❑ Planning Commission Agenda ❑ Notice of Action Packet ❑ Short Subdivision Agenda ❑ Official Notice Packet ❑ Notice of Application for ❑ Notice of Application Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Other wa mailed axed/posted to/at each of the following addresses (see attached list) on - ,,-1 he— . , 1993. Name of Project irA,I„o,Q G Signature r--- File Number L( - 9_3 - con 7 Date /a�/4 AFFIDAVI.FRM REVISED 7/2/93 j PROPOSED PARAGON OFFICE &RESEARCH FACII,rrY Mailing List Randy Hamblin Agency Building Inc The Quadrant Corp 31919 - 1st Ave S #100 PO Box 130 Federal Way WA 98023 Bellevue WA 98009 Olympic Office Center LP Merkin Anton H 1116 - 15th Ave E 3260 Lakewood Ave S Seattle WA 98112 Seattle WA 98144 Bonham Investments Co Inc Weyerhaeuser Co 280 N Central Ave Rm 430 Tax Dept Hartsdale NY 10530 Tacoma WA 98477 Federal Way Water Barbara Billings PO Box 4249 PO Box 5208 Federal Way WA 98003 Redondo WA 98054 h CITY OF • (206)661-4000 \)\) Fry 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 Mr. George F. Sherwin, Jr., Vice President December 20, 1993 The Quadrant Corporation PO Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 RE: Paragon Office and Research Facility - File No.'s SPR93-0016 and UPR93-0007 Dear Mr. Sherwin: The city has completed its administrative review of your proposed 88,130 square foot, two story office and research facility for Paragon Trade Brands, Inc., located at 750 South 334th Street in the City of Federal Way. The site plan has been administratively approved per the Findings For Site Plan Approval (enclosed) and subject to the following condition: 1. Pursuant to section 18-78 of the Environmental Protection Ordinance, all mitigation measures of the April 18, 1993, determination of nonsignificance are incorporated by reference as conditions of this approval. Failure to comply with the mitigation measures shall constitute grounds for suspension and/or revocation of this approval. This application is now being forwarded to the city's Hearing Examiner and City Council for final action. A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, January 4, at 3 p.m., for the Hearing Examiner's review of the proposal. Under Process III review, the proposed development requires final approval by the City Council. Theiefore, this administrative decision will form the basis for a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. This administrative decision is required by the Federal Way City Code to be incorporated into the staff report prepared for Hearing Examiner and City Council review. It does not grant license to begin any type of site work. This administrative decision may be appealed by filing a written letter of appeal with the Department of Community Development no later than 5 p.m., Tuesday, December 30, 1993. In addition, you may request reconsideration of this decision by filing a written request with the Department of Community Development no later than 5 p.m., Tuesday, December 23, 1993. If you have any questions, please call Stephen Clifton (Senior Planner) at 661-4109. Si ely, t/ I, , t‘O 17/ 6.9-291-€ Gr gor, . re, AICP Actin/ o nity Development Services Director enc: Findings for Site Plan Approval c: Stephen Clifton, Senior Planner A...paragon upr93007.spr CITY OF = • (206)661-4000 W33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 April 4, 1994 Ms. Dianne Anderson Department of Natural Resources c.\\*.° S. PO Box 68 Enumclaw, WA 98022 RE: Paragon Office and Research Facility FW File No.'s SPR93-0016 and UPR93-0007 Department of Natural Resources No. FP-09-2400675 Dear Ms. Anderson: The City of Federal Way is in receipt of a Forest Practices Act (FPA) application for the proposed project. The FPA request is to allow clearing for purposes of constructing an Office and Research Facility. According to your SEPA Lead Agency Notice, the City of Federal Way is to notify your office with a recommendation on the FPA application. A SEPA review was performed and determination issued on the proposed project. Included as part of the review was clearing of the property. As such, the city recommends approval of the FPA. If you have any questions, please call me at 661-4109. Sincerely, ,/ �,,,,���j� _ '7% - -/0.1 -.1-) hen Clifton, AI Senior Planner/Urban Designer c: George F. Sherwin, Jr, Vice President, Quadrant Corporation I\...paragon\upT93007.dnr � �4� -�FO' T PRACTICES APPLICATION/1 :FICATION FPA Number � i PROCESS AND CONDIiiONS F�t _ Data Received: Reviewer Comments Final Due Date: Shutdown Zone: NAME OF OPERATOR ,-) NAME OF LANDOWNER NAME OF TIMBER OWNER 7Z9 7/2„irj_z7//11 .._. .e2.eit''7,Ve0,7/2 .% lubdivisionISection(s) I TWP Nth RGE E/W ( CLASS OF APPLICATION SC: I //) , -_ ?/ I Z ❑ CLASS II ❑ CLASS . 1 ❑ CLAS , j Type of Operation Total Acres 1 ,(� CLASS / n E.] CLASS IV-S ___/. ti_thei___'. ❑ APPLICATION APPROVED CONDITIONS II TO THIS APPLICATION / NOTIFICATION THIS OPERATION IS SUBJECT TO: ❑ Hrdnuiiea Proj«c Amoral ❑ I` 0 Environmental Checkiist 0 Convicted FPA Forms Aet M+D ❑ Addiriaosl Coodivata Attached 0 Other APPROVAL CONDITIONS: II I t 0 PRE-FILE REVIEW COMPLETE ❑ APPLICATION INCOMPLETE / APPLICATION COMPLETE El APPLICATION ON HOLD ❑ APPLICATION DISAPPROVED DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SIGNATURE TITLE �„ — DATE: INITIAL: _ :Sty REGION: ,J� AGENCY COPIES SENT: FINAL COPIES SENT: EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE: S COPIES DISTRIBUTED TO: FP FORESTER, /ECOLOGY /ES FISHERIES A WILDLIFE AFFECTED INDIAN TRIBE: l � LOCAL GOVERNMENT' AFFECTED INDIAN TRIBE: ,' �\.. ..7.-;?/ ').2.4,/ OTHERS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFECTED INDIAN TRIBE: OTHERS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT: CITY OF G • (206)661-4000 > ) FTIY. 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 April 4, 1994 Ms. Dianne Anderson RE C E 1 V F D Department of Natural Resources PO Box 68 APR 0 5 1994 Enumclaw, WA 98022 Vi\ili - oh RE: Paragon Office and Research Facility FW File No.'s SPR93-0016 and UPR93-0007 Department of Natural Resources No. FP-09-2400675 Dear Ms. Anderson: The City of Federal Way is in receipt of a Forest Practices Act (FPA) application for the proposed project. The FPA request is to allow clearing for purposes of constructing an Office and Research Facility. According to your SEPA Lead Agency Notice, the City of Federal Way is to notify your office with a recommendation on the FPA application. A SEPA review was performed and determination issued on the proposed project. Included as part of the review was clearing of the property. As such, the city recommends approval of the FPA. If you have any questions, please call me at 661-4109. Sincerely, lZ /7,,,,/z07;,„, C St hen Clifton, Al Senior Planner/Urban Designer c: George F. Sherwin, Jr, Vice President, Quadrant Corporation IN...pangon\upr93 W 7Am L;) WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF Natural Resources v BRIAN BOYLE Commissioner of Public Lands South Puget Sound Region 28329 SE 448th St. P.O. Box 68 Enumclaw, WA 98022 (206) 825-1631 SEPA Lead Agency Notice Re: FP-09- ,,VcioI94- The dep tment as determined according to WAC 197-11-938 (4) that is the lead agency for purposes of compliance with State E v ronmenta Po cy Act for the above referenced forest practice application(s) . Should you disagree with this determination, you may petition the Dept. of Ecology to resolve the issue pursuant to WAC 197-11-946. The application(s ) are subject to a 30-day period of approval unless you determine a detailed statement under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) is required. Please notify our office by the due date on the application your recommendations for approval , disapproval or conditioning of the application by the due date. BC/sc 880510 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer ' 4/ cam/u,1�'`pOAPPLICATION/NC PRACTICES �A Number: 'ICATION 4 �� G PROCESS AND - _CONDITIONS z9- � 3 Date Received: Reviewer Comments Final Due Date: Shutdown Zone: Due: v3 -45- 95/ , lag- 9 4Z- /I- 9S G -9 _ �Ny M AME OF OPERATOR NAME OF NAME OF TDBER OWNER2-1 _LB /l7?1liKepAt7k .SubdivisioniSection(s) TWP Nth RGE E/W =Ass or APPLICATION R< / . 2l ❑ CLASS II ❑ CLASS III ❑ CLASS III-P Type of Operation Total Acres pt CLASS IV-G F e . 6 ❑ CLASS IV-S 0 APPLICATION APPROVED CONDITIONS TO THIS APPLICATION / NOTIFICATION THIS OPERATION IS SUBJECT TO: ❑ Hydraulics Project Appal 0 Skinks=Management An ❑ E .noomoul Checklist 0 Comolemd FM Form Map 0 Additional Conditions Auaehed 0 Other APPROVAL CONDITIONS: I ❑ PRE-FILE REVIEW COMPLETE El APPLICATION INCOMPLETE APPLICATION• COMPLETE ❑ APPLICATION ON HOLD 0 APPLICATION DISAPPROVED DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SIGNATURE: TLTLE: DATE: • INITIAL: REGION: AGENCY COPIES SENT: FINAL COPIES SENT: EFFECTIVE DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: COPIES DISTRIBUTED TO: FP FORESTER iffgCOLOGY /QS FISHERIES A WILDLIFE AFFECTED INDIAN TRIBE: : Mka / LOCAL GOVERNMENT • / 17 AFFECTED INDIAN TRIBE: OTHERS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT: AFFECTED INDIAN TRIBE OTHERS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT: -. -- —-- - WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMEr FOR EST F R T PRACTIC • --�— Natural ztesou___s APPLICATION / NOTIFICATION goy- I. GENERAL INFORMATION SECTION REFER TO THE INSTRUCTIONS TO ASSIST IN THE COMPLETION OF THIS FORM, TYPE OR PRINT IN PERMANENT INK. 1. FULL LEGAL NAME AND/OR 2. FULL LEGAL NAME AND I OR 3. FULL LEGAL NAME AND/OR COMPANY/DIVISION NAME OF OPERATOR COMPANY/DIVISION NAME OF LANDOWNER COMPANY/DIVISION NAME OF TIMBER OWNER TBA Paragon Trade Brands Inc. TBA BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS ADDRESS TBA 505 So. 336th St. CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP Federal Way, WA 98003 PHONE: ( ) PHONE: (206 ) 924-2345 PHONE: ( 1 Unified Business Identifier(or SSN 11) UBI I I Unified Business Identifier(or SSN 41 UBI [1 Unified Business Identifier (or SSN 4) UBI (1 SSN I SSN [I SSN 11 4.TYPE OF LEGAL ENTITY TYPE OF LEGAL ENTITY TYPE OF LEGAL ENTITY l) CORPORATION I 1 OTHER(specify) PS CORPORATION [) OTHER(specify) [ 1 CORPORATION [ 1 OTHER(specify) [I PARTNERSHIP II PARTNERSHIP I PARTNERSHIP [I SOLE OWNER I I SOLE OWNER [1 SOLE OWNER FOR TAX INFORMATION CALL 1-800-548-8829 5. FOREST TAX REPORTING ACCOUNT No: TBA 6. lc] YES [ ] NO - IS THE OPERATION WITHIN CITY LIMITS? NAME OF CITY(s): Federal Way 7. [ ] YES NO - IS THE OPERATION WITHIN A PUBLIC PARK? If yes, an Environmental Checklist is required. [] YES XX NO - IS THE OPERATION WITHIN 500 FEET OF A PUBLIC PARK? NAME OF PARK: N/A • 8. LEGAL SUB-DIVISION OF OPERATION(S): (INCLUDE PARCEL OR TAX LOT NUMBER) SUB-DIVISION (1/4, 1/4) SECTION TWP RANGE PARCEL OR TAX (E)(W) LOT NUMBER(S) Portion SW 1/4 17 21N 4E 192z500-0280-02 I2b5UU-U29U-UU 926500-0300-08 926500-0310-06 9. K] YES [ ] NO - WAS THE LAND PLATTED AFTER JANUARY 1, 1960 (INCLUDING SHORT PLATS)? (You May Contact County Assessor for Verification). If Yes, Environmental Checklist Is Required. 10. C] YES [ 1 NO - LANDOWNER INTENDS TO CLEAR, IMPROVE OR DEVELOP LAND WITHIN THREE YEARS? NOTE: 1. If yes, attach a completed Environmental Checklist. A1TACIU1EO 2. A local government clearing and/or grading permit may be required. Nor. 3. See the instructions for more information relating to conversions. RECEIVED 11. [ ] YES [X NO - DO YOU HAVE AN APPROVED CONVERSION OPTION HARVEST PLAN (COHP)? If yes, include a copy of the approved plan. NOTE: Not all Local Governments accept COHP's. MAR 141994 (For FPA Fee Information see the Instructions) DNR-SPS FORM DNR 00-18 18-93) 1 w..nuor.eoo1 ® IS II. WATER SECTIOI You must answer all questions in this Section. All work within Type 1-3 Waters will require a Hydraulics Project Approval (HPA). Work within Type 4-5 Waters may require an HPA. Completion of this section will serve as your request for an HPA from the Department of Fisheries or Wildlife. If you are operating within 200 feet of a Type 1 or 1 + Water, contact the local government for shoreline management information. 12. LIST ANY ACTIVITIES THAT WILL BE WITHIN OR OVER THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OF ANY WATER. Check (1)the activities you will be doing in each type of water. The location of all culverts and bridges must be shown on the base map. Culvert Base Map information must include culvert length, diameter, and type(round or half pipe). Bridge .location information must show whether the bridge is temporary or permanent. (A) (B) ICI (D) (E) (F) (GI (H) II) Water Road Water Falling/ Yarding/ Suspend Yarding/ Operate Apply Other Activity Type Constr. Crossing Bucking Cable Cables Ground Equipment Chemicals (Show under question 29) 1 2 3 4 5 13. [ ) YES NO - WILL THERE BE ANY ACTIVITIES WITHIN 200 FEET OF A TYPE 1 - 3 WATERS? FEET If Yes, how close? 14. [ 1 YES D NO - WILL THERE BE ANY ACTIVITIES WITHIN 25 FEET OF TYPE 4-5 WATERS7 15. ( ] YES EN NO - ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY WATER INTAKES IN YOUR UNIT OR WITHIN 1/2 MILE DOWNSTREAM OF THIS OPERATION? III. WETLAND SECTION You must answer all questions in this section. 16. [] YES lc] NO - DO WETLANDS EXIST WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO YOUR FOREST PRACTICE? If YES, check ( ,/ ► the appropriate squares in the following table describing your work within a Wetland or Wetland Management Zone, and show the location and classification of all Forested Wetlands over 5 acres in size, and all Class A and B Wetlands on the Activity Map. (For wetland typing information see WAC 222-16-035.)) Wetland (A) (B) IC) (D) (E) IF) Type Road Water Yarding/ Operate Apply Other Constr. Crossing Ground Equipment Chemicals (Show under question 29) A B Forested 17. [ ] YES LX) NO - WILL YOUR PROJECT BE FILLING OR DRAINING A WETLAND? ( ACRES) If Yes, how many acres will you be filling or draining? A mitigation plan and a SEPA checklist must accompany this application if you are filling or draining more than 1/2 acre of any wetland. FORM DNR QQ•19(8-93) 2 • I ROAD CONSTRUCTION :TION 14 No Road Construction or Reconstruction. (If you will not be doing any work involving roads go to Section V.) 18. ROAD CONSTRUCTION: (Complete all blocks that apply and LABEL EACH TYPE SEPARATELY ON MAP.) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TOTAL LENGTH LENGTH OF ENDHAUL STEEPEST SIDE IN FEET CONSTRUCTION SLOPE ROAD (in linear feet) CROSSES (in percent) 1 1 NEW PERMANENT ROAD [1 NEW TEMPORARY ROAD [1 EXISTING ROAD RECONSTRUCTION [1 EXISTING ROAD MAINTENANCE [)ROAD ABANDONMENT V. TIMBER HARVEST SECTION [ ] No Timber Harvest Under This Application. (If you will not be harvesting timber, go to Section VI.) 19. TIMBER HARVEST INFORMATION UNIT TYPE OF POST METHOD OF ACRES PERCENT OF ESTIMATED HARVEST HARVEST HARVEST VOLUME TO VOLUME TO BE •(Even-aged, TREES (per BE CUT HARVESTED Uneven-aged PER ACRE lees#19 in the type of Salvage and/or instructions harvest) (in MBA Right of Way) FOR for choices) UNEVEN. Show the location of each AGED harvest tvoe on Map. HARVEST u re si uneven aged 12 tracked skidder 5.8 66% 100.000BF • • " For even-aged harvests, providesurrounding stand information on the map as required under WAC 222-30-025. See i sunstructions. 20. [] YES Pi NO - WILL YOU BE HARVESTING TIMBER OR LEAVING TREES WITHIN TWO TREE LENGTHS OF ANY OVERHEAD POWER LINES? (If yes, the applicant needs to notify the appropriate Power Company.) 21. , INDICATE HOW THE FOLLOWING WILDLIFE TREES WILL BE LEFT: (Check all that apply) WILDLIFE RESERVE TREES GREEN RECRUITMENT TREES N.A [ ] CLUMPED (Show on Map) [] CLUMPED (Show on Map) [ ] EVENLY DISTRIBUTED (Throughout Unit) [ ] EVENLY DISTRIBUTED (Throughout Unit) 22. []YES II NO - WILL YOU BE REMOVING TREES WITHIN THE MAXIMUM WIDTH RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT ZONE THAT ARE PROVIDING CANOPY COVER TO THE STREAM? IF YES, GIVE THE MIDPOINT ELEVATION AND EXISTING CANOPY COVER OF ALL STREAM REACH(s) AND LABEL THE STREAM REACH(s) ON THE MAP: STREAM REACH#1. 'ELEV., % COVER. STREAM REACH #2. 'ELEV., % COVER. STREAM REACH #3. 'ELEV., _ % COVER. STREAM REACH #4. 'ELEV., _ % COVER. 23. [] YES P4 NO - WILL YOU BE LEAVING A DOUBLE-WIDE RMZ(s) FOR GREEN-UP? INDICATE DOUBLE-WIDE RMZ LOCATION(s) ON MAP 24. REFORESTATION METHOD: Reforestation is required for lands harvested after January 1, 1975 as shown under WAC 222-34-010 (West of Cascades Summit), or WAC 222-34-020 (East of Cascades Summit). [ 1 PLANTING (Species: [ ] NATURAL (Applicant must submit a Reforestation Plan - See Instructions.) N/A Convertible land FORM DNR QQ-19(e-93) 3 VI. AF- AL CHEMICAL APPLICAT---1 SECTION [4 This Forest Practice Does nvolve The Application Of Any Pesticide Fertilizer. (If no, go to Section VII.) 25. TYPE OF CHEMICAL APPLICATION: [ ] FERTILIZER APPLICATION - For fertilizer applications answer question 28. [] PESTICIDE TREATMENT - NET ACRES ( 1 - For pesticide applications answer questions 26, 27 and 28. (Please describe the type of pesticide treatments you are proposing in the "General Description Section".) 26. LIST THE EPA REGISTRATION NUMBERS, TRADE NAMES, AND RATES OF APPLICATION FOR ALL CHEMICALS PROPOSED, INCLUDING ALL ADJUVANTS. EPA REG.No. Trade Name of Chemical Application Unit of Measure Rate per acre 27. [] YES [I NO - WILL THIS PESTICIDE BE USED UNDER A DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENTAL USE PERMIT? If yes, include a copy of the Experimental Use Permit. 28. CHEMICAL INFORMATION CONTACT PERSON PHONE #J ) VII. GENERAL DESCRIPTION SECTION 29. Provide any details that will give a better understanding of your project. Selective clearing of busines park site to build a corporate headquarters under City of Federal Way zoning jurisdiction. Site is approximately 5.8 acres. City SEPA process is ca plete. Compliance with this application/ notification does not ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act, or other federal, state, or local laws. SIGNATURE BLOCKS We affirm that the information contained herein is true, and understand that this proposed Forest Practice is subject to the current rules and regulations of the forest practices act, as well as any applicable Federal, State or Local rules and regulations. OPERATOR _ LANDOWNER TIMBER OWNER Signature Signature Signature L/- ( Print TEA Print Paragon Trade Brands Inc. Print T+EA Quadrant Corp, Agent contact: Mike Peterson (206) 682-2222 FORM DNR QQ-19 16-93) 4 H ORES PRACT C - SAS - VAR TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH , RANGE 04 EAST ( W . M ) , SECTION 17 APPLICATION 1 63 i i 80 i__ i 97 11 t \ I 1 I 1 i I i , i i 1 i i //‘ ® I I .,.� I I � _I �' ��\ ■i f ; 79 \\ -, N\ ', 96 1 1 ----. / \C" .-.' 1 -I ,\// \\` \ — \ Ii — \ / l \ \ i / liIIJ 1 ,/ , /4,17' Itt i m \,ni :i 1 \ 7, 11* 1 I di \ \. 0- .411 111 \ \\ I MIR i I \1—— 1 I SCALE 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 IJ11u 11111 111111 111111111111111111111 ll111111111111lltllle I 1 FEET 1 Mile c52eo w MAP DATE November 02, 1993 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 40 Feet LEGEND: See Instructions NAD 27 DISCLAIMER: See Legend Copy CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 (206) 661-4118 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH FACILITY Federal Way File No. SEP93-0009 Related File No.'s UPR93-0007 Description of Proposal: The proposal is to construct as 88,130 square foot, two stUry office and research facility on a 5.8 acre site for Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. Existing zoning for subject site is Office Park(OP). Access is proposed at four locations. One along South 333rd Street,two along 334th Street, and one along 8th Avenue South. Proponent: George F. Sherwin,Jr., Vice President The Quadrant.Corporation P.O. Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 (206) 455-2900 Location: 750 South 334th Street. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way City Contact: Stephen Clifton, AICP - Senior Planner, 661-4109 The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following Findings of Fact based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist and the "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist"; Federal Way application no. SEP93-0009, Conclusions of Law based upon the 1990 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to R.C.W 43.21C.060. Findings of Fact: 1. The site contains slopes ranging from less than 2 percent to 27 percent. 2. The site is moderately to heavily wooded with a second and third-growth mixture of coniferous and broad-leafed trees native to the Pacific Northwest. The dominant tree is 1 the Douglas Fir. Second-story vegetation and groundcover consists of Northwest native species including salal, sword fern, berry vines and grasses. 3. Access is proposed at four locations. One along South 333rd Street, two along 334th Street, and one along 8th Avenue South. 4. Preliminary earthwork calculations include approximately 18,000 cubic yards of cut and 20,000 cubic yards of fill. Thus, a net gain of 2,000 cubic yards of fill will be brought on-site. 5. No environmentally sensitive areas have been identified on-site. 6. Runoff from the site shall be controlled by the use of on-site detention per the King County Surface Design Manual (KCSWDM) and recommendation BW-2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan unless additional regional detention is developed in Lake No. 1 as currently proposed by the Quadrant Corporation. 7. As with all paved developed areas, the parking area will contribute some pollutants to ground and surface waters as these will be washed off by storm drainage across the site. Some of these pollutants can be separated out of the storm water runoff by use of grass- lined swales (bio-filtration swales). 8. A traffic impact analysis and supplemental information provided by the consultant for the Paragon Trade Brands Facility has been used to identify impacts to the general vicinity of the project. The total number of vehicle trips per day will be 1,140. It has been determined that pro-rata share contributions shall be imposed to mitigate impacts at four locations (see conditions below). 9. The Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, Federal Way Application No. SEP93-0009 is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. Conclusions of Law: Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Policies (1990) FWCC Section C-25 - Assure that commercial development has minimal impact on lakes, streams and drainage ways, air quality or noise levels. FWCP Policy T-12: Require mitigation of direct transportation impacts created by new development. FWCC Section 18 - Section 18, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, of the Federal Way Zoning Code is adopted as a basis for the City's exercise of authority under Section 18 Environmental Policy, pursuant to section 18.122(b)(d)(2). The lead agency has determined that the proposed action does not have a probable significant adverse , 2 impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), only if the following conditions are met. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, site visits, and other information and reports on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Conditions: 1. Runoff from the site shall be controlled by the use of on-site detention per the King County Surface Design Manual (KCSWDM) and recommendation BW-2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan unless additional regional detention is developed in Lake No. 1 as currently proposed by the Quadrant Corporation. 2. The following contributions for each TIP project impacted by the proposed project shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of any construction permits. a. $26,300 - S 336th Street @ SR 99 TIP project, widening to five lanes and signal modification; b. $2,300 - 1st Avenue S - S 320th Street to S 316th Street, roadway widening and realignment; c. $24,800-S 348th Street-I-5 to SR 99, roadway realignment and signal modification; and d. $1,800 - S 333rd Street/lst Way S, signalization of the intersection, This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted no later than 5 p.m. December 1. 1993, Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following expiration of the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 calendar days of the above comment deadline. Contact: Stephen Clifton,AICP -Senior Planner Phone: 661-4109 Responsible Official: Kenneth E. Nyberg Position!IStle: Assistant City Manager/Director of Community Development Address: 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Issued: November 16. 1993 • Signature: eZ7144444-i i4eAA'4'0/1444"2-11t C'QAAjw-ei i:..paragon\sep ---34367 VICINITY MA PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH FACILITY MIRROR a h K J s 313TH S J), L.AKE 13 xsr. 1 ,�, ; i 313TH y CO v� ..,t ti .f.. o Ar lO ( v ¢ 0 s 311TH.' y ST At o < .: r ;d: yZ316TH ST el 2 a O rn `r `ma y S 315TH �S < ; S CC -:. . 315TH (� t6 �,316TH g PL ® . .MI .r;'� ST a R°• u• LNX SW t .`.1 S316THPL •S31• • pp i•s ST S316THST A 317THPLCT S317rHST ' Fe, 17TH- ` ®!.o® } y t sTTM q e ASW319THIN S317TH y PL S3 co t a. :TH ; ye S� ¢ 4 g h P g 320TH �� .3ti2 3 C N ¢ PL x f1 SO11k S 318TH , 319TH oiP S H U8 SEA MC a GP•� 1 �g.� aSWP3 vt 0 a . .n ` S 320TH Sr ''E <1i yA I =1 321 H�0.SP N 5 y 1 ST • S pr shr tau sr S321srm. `� --e� y'` #(' t. • PL sw s.. . 'c RD SW 324TH 44 324T1� e- ' , 327 NO SW . S. �, r/CtNSBVG c2 p2 ik S S 325TH sr Pl. t.o abc E 4- ' s 4,4 S 325TH' 3201 ST , 0 s AIRK6 y h s G 54 S 324TH sc AIOE s�t \ g y s r� ff*S 324TH le.'. WINGED FOOT WY SW . SI SW i S 15 m �' s ST Pl 0 ;y� , ? IiLeid y7lT1PL II �S S'� d� -,, ' 329Th: Sr `� TM3 S327TH �, v '�� i. •11 •. - •S a1r,. 5- SiE R A • 331STPL ,� "Z ��Q. <; tv . sw w, wA I y s33orHsr�y�� 7L a qç4j,t (T2/6.9 +34THCT .' S332ND S^ S331STST H l �t ��"��'� 1���a. 41 5331O �n v� SW « ST SW `� o� _,di Ce 333RD T;," ST 10 �c 0. r1 y Nv (q N 7 1°( % 4. �,¢`p"� 'J� 5•,,' 931 I rIE �C&I Zi �i777i =i 3 Y 5C r:r,< 44 CTS_W. , '�# C�7' A(dj z J. •336TH ST S °1 Ia2i-� g, cc U s s, , lip 336TH r< AO t. .� ST / S 336TH PLnr S H y AV S 338TH • S r TH CIR co KITTS M SS338THS7 ;1STCO1S CORNER oqs • R •ar." ¢ `>' ' V S340ST O 4 �yc" s 3�oTH 8 �`� EYERHAEUS c `�gt KI .. sye�51 0 C' Pp aQ r� i r EADQUARTER• v AQUATIC •�' CENTER ) S; 4 Y co SI. a la s 343Rb sr s s 344TH o v = Syy 345TH Aillir 1 ua3 ( g / „...4346 N �,4�y y S 346TH ST6. h ST FRAN• CIS y H S Sat IIht SW ti ��\F HOSPITAL 3 F. firti S' �•C s ' S 348TH ST cs?. = S 347TH PL 61/ J a AP W a " --� �� P" RIDE S 350TH sr s TM c J 161111.- /' ?]7 - h 349ST/S �\ \ S351STST r > < S . � [ e.. (n 3'�Y ,i e•; aqa� �t D- 353R0 `., r v',f1�m_ � m S _ 3521J0 / a ar s G r N3555TTH o \\\ 'r E�. ; y ,�� u7q Ou: NS ��( PL < P1 N S � S� m ' TH'yl S 354 T 3S6 v N • S 357TH ST / , / ' '�, <�a IN 357T �I I < > / \ ' S 355TH S �SeT a o I 161 ^ "� s 35sTTH -sT /6" 1 CT T. ¢ S 358THr,7 1 ----s" 1 1 �! uN r 111 t I 1 t[[I Il p in of tfgt} i5: ; .1ict5It /} ft ' �` I ; `!t eff}gv LEI og $ �i a If- El:�l(� �'S I I�i � I c �+� �'� i t t its fl$ {i��{ as a M I 1 I �S i ltr . ( s z Wit' rI t } as �; i all $fli g a4[ }[{t ta ( g}t !Ea I •- • x :y ti 111 a fl $ N. a /�' e� 11 Ikv -ri4.1 7 t � • ilii r r. . cioilio - ' . y +i at • -f • .J 0• J *, • 4 .... 1i k _ a R ..£L°R Rat r R \'l.,'.. -t W., x. Y � � - •— �1� L' 1. r. • .n I f 66 p ii11 '' Ti.r z 111 [ a ' � ' Z j .1 ? Mc $t ty �� f1'1iil T. . 'fit -� .. ....,...., .,...7.71 .;,,, 3.711111,3.-- ., ,11-vit.i-1;:,, Ei .f.„.. .... .,-i, p.r• —,:.','.i:i' 1 0 V - : - :1. .i • T " "i r.•':�4..... ....i,,,, • 17 N _ Zak " 1 L.—frnrn � ...i :* dA f7 'ii1 spy_ � I — Oligmum- Itet--":_40.1., ..1.sh. .74§ ?.•1 1� MenV. � 1i .N.' .".i .;. a . f � n.a _�it •J ll � 1 I y : � nct ` ,`' . Gr.;, • •• I `:•i _t��.r�=nit•©� �, 1. e • \ i — .. \ 8tI-AVENUE s" _—• — ' • A NEW FACILITY FOR ..•m....w. '"`s mueller PARAGON TRADE BRANDS ZINC. n associates ... architects aim ,.00 a� a'+--••.•-•..w-«/.ww•.a.a...em THE QUADRANT CORPORATION FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON =` SITE PLAN PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH FACTE,ITY SEC TWP RGE CONTROL NO TP NAME DESCRIPTION LOC/CODE LOCATION WATER SOURCE TRIBUTARY TO: 17 21 040E G1--2054501 G1-20545C MU 17 S2SW4 WELL INTEREST MUCKLESHOOT TRIBE INTEREST PUYALLUP TRIBE 3 .q;- CITY OF • (206)661-4000 N).\) 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 October 11, 1993 George F. Sherwin, Jr., Vice President The Quadrant Corporation P.O. Box 130 11‘\4 Bellevue, WA 98009 RE: Paragon Office and Research Facility File No. UPR93-0007 Dear Mr. Sherwin: The city is in receipt of your September 27, 1993, letter which outlines your estimates of the processing times for various review phases of the application. In reviewing your estimated dates, it is important to point out that the city does not share your projections based on the following: Community Development Review Committee ("CDRC") Revised drawings and associated materials received on September 27, 1993, were given to CDRC members to review changes to the site plan. The committee met to discuss these changes and associated materials on October 7, 1993. SEPA Review Estimated dates listed in your letter assume a SEPA determination issuance date of October 15, 1993. Due to a lack of information, this is not possible. In order to complete our review and issue a SEPA determination, additional information is required, specifically related to transportation. The city's Transportation Analyst is working with your transportation consultant to complete this phase of review. When the transportation division has the required information, recommended conditions will be forwarded to the Department of Community Development to include as part of a SEPA determination. Once a determination is issued, a fifteen (15) day comment and fourteen (14) day appeal period begins, for a total of 29 days. • George F. Sherwin, Jr. October 11, 1993 Page 2 Hearing Examiner Review A hearing will be scheduled sometime after the SEPA determination is issued. The availability of a hearing date is based on the level of hearings scheduled before the Hearing Examiner. With a SEPA determination date of October 15, 1993 unlikely, a Hearing Examiner hearing date of November 19, 1993, is not possible. Once a hearing is held, the Hearing Examiner will render a decision within ten (10) working days (two weeks). Any person who has a right to challenge the recommendation may request reconsideration of the decision within seven (7) calendar days after the date of issuance of the hearing examiner's recommendation. Challenges to the hearing examiner recommendation may be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days after the issuance of the hearing examiner's recommendation. Article VIII of the Federal Way City Code describes the specific processes in more detail. City Council Review The Hearing Examiner only renders a recommendation in a Process III review. The final decision for all such requests rests with the City Council. The City Council Land Use Committee, which meets once per month, considers the hearing examiner's recommendation prior to forwarding it onto the full council. It should be noted that the City Council Land Use Committee determines which items will be placed on a particular agenda based on the number of other items scheduled before the full council. Once a SEPA determination is issued, the following lists potential timelines for required steps in the review process: 1. SEPA Determination - Comment and appeal period totals twenty-nine (29) days after issuance of determination. 2. Hearing Examiner - Hearing may be held within forty-five (45) - sixty (60) days of the issuance of the SEPA determination. 3. Hearing Examiner Recommendation - Issued within ten (10) working days (two weeks) of the hearing date. Seven (7) day reconsideration and fourteen (14) day appeal period (runs concurrently). George F. Sherwin, Jr. October 11, 1993 Page 3 4. City Council Land Use Committee (CCLUC) - Held the second Tuesday of each month. Hearing Examiner recommendation typically forwarded to the next available CCLUC meeting. 5. City Council Decision-Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and Land Use Committee is forwarded to the next full City Council meeting following the Land Use Committee meeting. In conclusion, until a SEPA determination is issued, it is difficult at this time to establish definite hearing and meeting dates. In addition, the above items do not address responsibilities associated with other applications. The city can only assure you that we are processing subject application as expeditiously as possible. If you have any questions, please call me at 661-4109. Sincerely ti Stephe Clifton, AIC Senior Planner n...paragan ,.� e-rr 9\OE.) t f v_r.,,rl1'1N ' r,•-(` «,-,. .. ,%f:..siVVl�{lY I l)tln!:,�P:T SEP271993 ESM inc. A CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND SURVEY,AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM PARAGON TRADES BRANDS, INC. PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH FACILITY, UPR93-0007 SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 REVIEW OF 7 CORE AND 12 SPECIAL REOUIREMENTS OF 1990 KCSWDM We have reviewed the Core and Special Requirements in Chapter No. 1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), and offer the following comments: Core Requirement No. 1 - Discharge at the Natural Location. Currently the site discharges to the southwest corner of the property and then flows over the curb and into an existing curb inlet located in the street The proposed project will continue to discharge at the natural location through a on-site drainage system which ties into the existing storm drainage system located in South 334th Street. Core Requirement No. 2 - Offsite Analysis An offsite analysis is required for this site because more than 5,000 square feet of stormwater runoff will be collected and concentrated. A Level One Analysis, dated May 1993, was submitted with the site plan application. Core Requirement No. 3 - Runoff Control The proposed design contains more than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface subject to vehicular use; therefore, a biofiltration facility is required per KCSWDM. Storm water detention is not required for this project if enhancement to regional detention is provided in Lake No. 1 as currently proposed by the Quadrant Corporation. If these proposed improvements are not incorporated into Lake No. 1, an on-site detention facility shall be designed to conform to recommendation BW-2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan. Information indicating the design and location feasible for on-site detention in-lieu- of the use of regional detention was submitted with the site plan application. 34004 9th Ave.So., Bldg.A • Federal Way,Washington 98003 Federal Way(206)838-6113 •Tacoma(206)927-0619 • Seattle(206)623-5911 • Fax:(206)838-7104 PARAGON TRADES __ANDS, INC. PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH FACILITY,UPR93-0007 SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 2 Core Requirement No. 4 - Conveyance System As part of the final engineering design for this project, it will be required to be demonstrated that the runoff from the 100-year/24-hour storm can be conveyed downstream per Core Requirement No. 2. The Paragon plan calls for collecting the storm drainage from the asphalt area and building, then routing flow into a biofiltration facility which then discharges into the storm drainage system in South 344th Street. Core requirement No. 2 has been addressed in the Level 1 - Downstream Analysis. Core Requirement No. 5 through 7 - Will apply during the final design review Special Requirement No. 1 - Critical Drainage Area The project does lie within the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin critical area. If an on-site detention facility is required for the project, the detention facility shall conform with the BW-2 recommendation of the critical drainage area plan Special Requirement No. 2 - Compliance with an Existing Master Drainage Plan Does not apply. Special Requirement No. 3 - Conditions Requiring a Master Drainage Plan Does not apply. Special Requirement No. 4 - Adopted Basin or Community Plans The project does lie within the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan area. If an on-site detention facility is required for the project, the detention facility shall conform with the BW-2 recommendation of the area plan. PARAGON TRADES ___kNDS, INC. PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH FACILITY,UPR93-0007 SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 3 Special Requirement No. 5 - Special Water Quality Controls The site will collect runoff from more than one acre of impervious surface that will be subject to vehicular use and the project is proposing to discharge runoff directly into a regional facility. A wetpond is not feasible for the project site and therefore, a biofiltration facility(KCSWDM water quality swale)will be designed. Special Requirement No. 6 - Coalescing Plate/Oil Water Separators Because the site does not exceed five acres of impervious surface, this requirement does not apply. Special Requirement No. 7 - Closed Depression Does not apply. Special Requirement No. 8 - Use of Lakes, Wetlands, or Closed Depressions for Peak Runoff Control Does not apply. Special Requirement No. 9 - Delineation of 100 Year Flood Plain Does not apply. Special Requirement No. 10 - Flood Protection Facilities for Type 1 and 2 Streams Does not apply. PARAGON TRADES DI ANDS,INC. PARAGON OFFICE AND RESEARCH FACILITY,UPR93-0007 SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 PAGE 4 Special Requirement No. 11 - Geotechnical Analysis and Report Does not apply because no pond or infiltration systems are proposed for this project. Special Requirement No. 12 - Soils Analysis and Report Geotech Consultants, Inc. has prepared a geotechnical engineering report for the proposed project. This report is attached for your review. s30:191132 0 el 1 EXPIRES 3/3/`/4 QUADRANT Quadrant Plaza,Suite 500 N.E.8th at 112th A Weyerhaeuser Company P.O.Box 130 Bellevue,Washington 98009 Tel(206)455 2900 fax(206)646 8300 September 27, 1993 rOFVr��N✓ j ' iv SAP pEa�Rrirfi�� Mr. Stephen Clifton JQ 99 Senior Planner 3 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Paragon Building Processing Schedule Dear Stephen: My appreciation to you and Greg Moore for our meeting on the Paragon project resubmittal. I have taken the information regarding processing steps and attempted to estimate some possible dates that would allow us to complete City Council review before the end of December. As I expressed, it is very important to us to accomplish this deadline to allow closing on the property this year. Some of these dates are at best guestimates, and I would appreciate your advice on whether there is a chance that we can make this schedule. Again, thank you for the meeting. Please call me with any issues which may arise. Sincerely, THE QUADRANT CORPORATION George F. Sherwin, Jr. Vice President GFS:ri Encl. cc: Greg Moore PARAGON TRADE BRANDS SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ESTIMATED DATES 9/27/93 9/27/93 Quadrant Resubmit Plans 10/15/93 Staff Publishes SEPA Decision 11/13/93 SEPA Decision Final (29 day statutory period) 11/19/93 (?) Hearing Examiner Hearing 11/30/93 Hearing Examiner issues Decision 12/14/93 City Council Land Use Subcommittee (14 days from H.E. decision) 12/21/93 City Council Public Meeting/Decision QUADRANT A Weyerhaeuser Company *s QUADRANTQuadrant Plaza,Suite 500 N.E.8th at 112th A Weyerhaeuser Company P.O.Box 130 Bellevue,Washington 98009 Tel(206)455 2900 Fax(206)646 8300 September 23, 1993 F r <<I,':,-Y .r-'r--, Mr. Stephen Clifton SE P 2 7 1993 Senior Planner CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Building and Parking Location at Paragon, Inc. Corporate Headquarters Dear Mr. Clifton: This letter is written to document compliance with the intent of Section 22-1441(a), which states that, "Wherever feasible, the buildings on the subject property should be located between the street and the parking area". The Paragon site design criteria and site characteristics as discussed below demonstrate that it is neither feasible or practical to meet the criteria and that the site design does meet the goals of providing convenient pedestrian access to adjacent streets, along with the avoidance of large, unsightly parking areas from street frontages. The facts are as follows: 1. Notwithstanding compliance with 22-1441(a), please be advised that the specific special regulations of the OP Zone (Sec. 22-826), Special Regulation 3, provides that the first 25 feet of setback must be in landscaping, and the second 25 feet may be "parking and driving areas". This criteria is met. 2. The building has been designed and located to provide a campus setting, maximizing retention of existing trees and screening from adjacent roadways. With the site being surrounded by streets on three sides, the concept of locating the building between streets and parking areas is illogical and unfeasible, with the only non-street property line being at the rear of the building in the loading dock area. Driving lanes with adjacent parking and pedestrian facilities are required around the building to provide convenient automotive and emergency equipment access. 3. In order to minimize and balance the grading of the site, thereby allowing maximum retention of significant trees and existing vegetation, the building has been sited at the location and at a floor elevation which will achieve this goal. Moving the building toward 8th Avenue South, which is the front entrance of the building, would significantly increase grading and steepen driveway and pedestrian slopes into the property, causing far greater site disturbance inconsistent with best utilization of the property. Mr. Stephen Clifton $E P 2 7 �gJ3 September 23, 1993 Page 2 4. A double row of parking along 8th Avenue South adjacent to the front entrance is critical to Paragon, Inc., as this is a high security facility with controlled entrances. Visitors and employees will primarily enter through the secure front entrance. Redistribution of parking away from the front entrance would make parking less convenient and defeat this purpose, inconsistent with corporate goals. 5. The extensive site landscaping on all perimeter streets and the one interior property line will ensure the visual compatibility of parking areas from both off-site and on-site views. 6. It is important that parking areas be kept to a minimum in the loading dock and truck access area to avoid conflicts between cars, trucks and pedestrians. The site plan minimizes parking in this area. There is adequate parking on site to meet the requirements of Paragon and they believe parking in this area will have limited use consistent with this goal. It is not acceptable to place additional parking in this area by relocation of the building. 7. Fire Department criteria stipulate a maximum 12% grade on access drives. Locating the building toward 8th Avenue South, while still attempting to minimize grading on the site for tree protection and balance of slopes would make the front entry inconsistent with this requirement. It would also significantly steepen pedestrian access from the street to the main entrance. We believe these issues clearly demonstrate that it is neither feasible, practical or acceptable to relocate the building between the street(s) and parking areas, and that both the public interest and interest of this corporate user are served by the design as presented. Sincerely, THE QUADRANT CORPabION ,M4,1'7 bi,G, George F. Sherwin, Jr. 1 Vice President GFS:ri QUADRANTQuadrant Plaza,Suite 500 N.E.8th at 112th A Weyerhaeuser Company P.O.Box 130 Bellevue,Washington 98009 Tel(206)455 2900 Fax(206)646 8300 September 23, 1993 Mr. Stephen Clifton Senior Planner CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Paragon Office and Research Facility File No. UPR93-0007 Dear Mr. Clifton: Submitted herewith are the revised plans and information responding to your Community Development Review Committee Report regarding the above referenced project. This submittal comments on each issue identified in your letter of June 23, 1993. SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS: 1. As shown on the site plan, the dumpster will be located in the loading dock area which is screened by the building on three sides and by Type I landscaping from the adjacent property line on the fourth. We believe this complies with Code requirements. CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. See Civil Site Plan. Existing lot lines will be eliminated in accordance with the Lot Line Elimination application attached hereto. The application will be signed and the fee paid at the time of Building Permit submittal. 2. Please see attached letter specifically addressing the issue of building location. 3. The landscaping plan has been revised in accordance with your comments and applicable Code. Landscape architect has met onsite with staff to address all issues. 4. Driveway curb cuts meet the City criteria and have been reviewed with Ron Garrow. 5. Solid waste and recyclying storage spaces are shown on the site plan within the loading dock area. .r,.Fi.)•�i I T V�sr�t"���+yk .,i C r� •,s'i I SEP 2 7 1993 Mr. Stephen Clifton September 23, 1993 Page 2 6. Information on significant trees is provided on the site plans. Significant tree retention meets Code through savings of trees over 12", and over 8" on a two for one basis. CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. We have reviewed the Office Park chapter and other related Code sections and designed the building accordingly. 2. There are no easements on the plats or zoning conditions which have been imposed by King County other than as shown on the civil plans. 3. Agreed. 4. Sidewalks have been provided throughout the site, providing convenient access to all building entries. In addition to the interior sidewalks, there are existing sidewalks on the streets abutting three sides of this property. We do not intend to install a sidewalk behind the building on the west side of the property. In this area we place a much higher priority on retention of significant trees which would be eliminated by an additional sidewalk. We also desire to discourage pedestrian traffic in the loading dock area and expect that these parking stalls will have very limited usage, as adequate parking is generally provided throughout the remainder of the site to meet the needs of Paragon who will own the building. 5. Retention of many significant trees, as well as existing vegetation, in ungraded areas along property lines and street frontages is provided. 6. Site plan provides for placement and screening of garbage receptacles and dumpsters. Rooftop equipment will meet screening standards. PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM RESPONSES: 1. A written narrative regarding the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual issues is enclosed. The site plan reflects the storm water system. 2. Detention requirements are understood and agreed. 3. It is understood staff has reviewed the traffic impact analysis. 4. The southerly driveway has been relocated per agreement with Ron Garrow of Public Works. r._ "1!NF1Y CE LL,,;• SEP 27 1993 Mr. Stephen Clifton September 23, 1993 Page 3 5. The Lot Line Elimination Application is submitted for review. Signing and payment of the fee will occur upon submittal for Building Permit. 6. All drawings are a maximum of 24" x 36". FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER REQUIREMENTS: 1. Water: A Developer Extension Agreement will be applied for concurrent with final engineering design submittal. 2. Sewer: Site sewer connection criteria will be met. An industrial user survey will be provided concurrent with submittal of final engineering design. 3. Fire Marshal's Checklist: All checklist requirements are understood and will be incorporated into construction drawings. Please advise if any additional submittals or information are required in order to obtain approval of the Master Land Use Site Plan and completion of the SEPA process. In addition to the other materials submitted, we have also enclosed 24 stamps for mailing of SEPA notices. Thank you for your assistance on this project. Sincerely, THE QUADRANT CORPORATION George F. Sherwin, Jr Vice President GFS:ri End. cc: Randy Hamblin John Cook, Paragon, Inc. SEP 27 1993 4 CITY OF G • NY� FlY 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003-6210 August 13, 1993 Ms. Susan Swanson ESM, Inc. 34004 9th Ave. S., Bldg. A Federal Way, Wa. 98003 Re: Paragon ROW Improvement Modification Dear Susan: We received and subsequently reviewed your request for modification of the driveway separation requirements of the City's codes relative to the proposed Paragon Office and Research Facility. As you know, the code required a 150-foot separation from all driveways either on the site, adjacent to the site, or across the street. Your proposal does not meet this criterion for the driveways on S. 334th Street. Regarding the easterly driveway, the location of the driveway as proposed would place it directly opposite the driveway across the street but would be within 150 feet of the adjacent street intersection to the east. Please note for future applications that the 150 feet is measured from the curb of the adjacent roadway and not the centerline of the street when determining separation from an intersection. This would place the driveway approximately 130± feet from the intersection. This is found to be acceptable in consideration of the opposing driveway. The westerly driveway is proposed 140± feet from a driveway on the adjacent property to the west and 140± feet from a driveway across the street and to the east. The existing driveway on the adjacent property is associated with the Daily Journal of Commerce operation and has relatively low traffic volumes. The opposing driveway receives considerably more traffic and serves a larger facility. Also, public safety takes priority over retention of specific trees and biofiltration swale configuration. As such, the modification for the separation from the opposing driveway across the street is denied and full 150-foot separation will be required. A modification to the adjacent driveway to the west is approved to provide the separation to the opposing driveway. Please give me a call if there are any questions. Sincerely, R0-711-0/-6faAA-4 -) Ronald Garrow,P.E. Sr. Development Engr. c: Stephen Clifton Ken Miller . GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 N.E.20th St.(Northup Way),Suite 16 rJUL 2 9 1993 March 4 , 1993 Bellevue.WA 98005 J N 93050 (206)747-56 he Quadrant Corporation E S kJ NI(' • FAX 7478561- � Y .O. Box 130 Bellevue, Washington 98122 Attention : Randy Hamblin PAL • fiLa Subject : Geotechnical Engineering Study "C ''' rAiC Proposed Office Building as South 333rd Street and 8th Avenue South cipcuoTE Federal Way, Washington Gentlemen : We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed office building to be constructed on 8th Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington . The purpose of our work was to explore site surface and subsurface conditions and to provide general earthwork recommendations and design criteria for foundations , retaining walls , and pavements . The work was authorized by your acceptance of our confirming proposal , dated February 15 , 1993 . The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with seven test pits . The explorations generally encountered 1 to 2 feet of loose topsoil overlying medium- dense silty sands . Dense silty sands (glacial till ) were encountered at depths of 3 to 4 feet. Lightly loaded foundations may be placed on medium-dense soils or structural fill while foundations designed for a high bearing pressure should be supported on native glacial till soils . The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations . Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report , or if we can be of further assistance during the design phase of this project . Respectfully submitted , GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC. ii•PuldMet James R . Finley , Jr . , P. E . Principal GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING SOUTH 333RD STREET AND 8TH AVENUE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY , WASHINGTON This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed office building in Federal Way, Washington . The general location of the site is illustrated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . We were provided with a preliminary grading and utility plan , developed by ESM , Inc . , and dated November 4 , 1992 . Based on these plans , we anticipate that the building will consist of a two-story structure with a footprint covering about 44 , 000 square feet. The finish floor of the building is to be at elevation 337 feet. Most of the remaining portion of the site is to be paved parking . Cuts of up to 14 feet are to be made in the parking area while fills on the order of 7 feet will be required in the building area . Development of the property is in the planning stage , therefore , detailed plans were not made available to us . The plans provided to us included the property boundaries , located the proposed building , and provided some topographical information . Geotech Consultants , Inc . should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design . Such a plan review would be additional work beyond our current scope of work for this study, and may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development , and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process . SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The site is a nearly square parcel covering approximately 5 .5 acres in the West Campus Office Park in Federal Way . Currently undeveloped , the property is vegetated with scattered evergreen and deciduous trees as well as brush . The site generally slopes down to a low area on the western portion of the property with inclinations of up to 25 percent. The surrounding area consists of office buildings and undeveloped property . GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC . The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 2 SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by seven test pits at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan , Plate 2 . The field exploration program was based upon the proposed construction , site topography and access , subsurface conditions revealed during excavation , the scope of work outlined in our proposal , and time and budget constraints . The test pits were excavated on February 19 , 1993 with a rubber-tired backhoe owned and operated by Evans Brothers Excavating . A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process , logged the test pits , and obtained representative samples of the soils encountered . "Grab" samples of selected subsurface soils were collected from the backhoe bucket . The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report as Plates 3 through 6 . The explorations encountered 1 to 2 feet of loose topsoils overlying medium-dense, silty sands with some organics . Dense silty sands were observed at depths of 3 to 4 feet. The dense silty sands have been glacially consolidated and are referred to in this report as glacial till . The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and laboratory tests . The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundary between soil types at the exploration locations . The actual transition between soil types may be gradual and subsurface conditions may vary between exploration locations . The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test pit logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during excavation . The logs should be reviewed for specific subsurface information at the locations tested . GROUNDWATER No groundwater seepage was observed in the explorations . However , the test pits were left open only for a short time period , therefore , the lack of seepage levels on the logs does not necessarily indicate that groundwater will not be encountered in the proposed excavations . It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors . We anticipate that groundwater could be found between the near-surface weathered soil and the underlying glacial till and in more permeable soil layers or pockets within the till soils . GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC. The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The proposed office building may be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on competent native soils or on structural fill placed on competent native soils . The on-site soils are silty making them sensitive to changes in moisture . Wet-weather grading of moisture sensitive soils can be difficult . It would be advantageous if grading and major earthwork is conducted during the typically drier months when the on-site soils can be aerated and the potential need to import granular fill would be reduced . It is recommended that Geotech Consultants , Inc . , review the final plans to verify that site specific geotechnical engineering considerations are addressed . We may recommend changes in the plans or design criteria , based on geotechnical considerations that become more evident during the review. CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed , native , non-organic soils or on structural fill placed above competent native soils . See the later sub-section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL for recommendations regarding structural fill placement and compaction beneath structures . Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of sixteen ( 16) and twenty-four (24 ) inches , respectively , and should be bottomed at least eighteen ( 18 ) inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface . The footing subgrade must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete. Depending upon site and equipment constraints , this may require removing the disturbed soil by hand . Footings constructed according to the above recommendations and bearing on the dense glacial till soils may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of five thousand (5000 ) pounds per square foot (psf ) . Footings bearing on structural fill or medium-dense native soils may be designed fdT an allowable bearing pressure of two thousand (2000 ) pounds per square foot (psf ) . A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC. The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 4 or seismic loads . For the above design criteria , it is anticipated that total post-construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness will be about one-half inch , with differential settlements on the order of less than one-half inch . Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils , or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical , embedded portions of the foundations . For the latter condition , the foundations must either be poured directly against relatively level , undisturbed soil or level structural fill must be placed around the outside of the foundation . We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation' s resistance to lateral loading : Design Parameter Value Coefficient of Friction 0 . 4 Passive Earth Pressure 400 pcf Where : ( 1 ) Pcf is pounds per cubic foot (2 ) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density . If the ground in front of the foundation is loose or sloping , the passive earth pressure given above will not be appropriate . We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1 . 5 be used for design of the foundation' s resistance to lateral loading . SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The site is located within Seismic Zone 3 as illustrated on Figure No . 2 of the 1991 Uniform Building Code (UBC) . In accordance with Table 23-J of the 1991 UBC , the site soil profile is best represented by Profile Type Si . GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC . The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 5 SLABS-ON-GRADE The building floors may be constructed as slabs-on-grade on the native sand soils or structural fill following the removal of the topsoil . The subgrade soils must be in a firm, non- yielding condition at the time of slab construction . Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select imported structural fill . All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break layer consisting of a minimum four (4) inch thickness of free- draining granular structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed later in PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS . In areas where the passage of moisture through the slab is undesirable , a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane should be placed beneath the slab. Additionally, sand should be used in the fine grading process to reduce damage to the vapor barrier and to provide uniform support under the slab. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures . The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve ( 12) feet in height which restrain level backfill : Design Parameter Value Active Earth Pressure* 35 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 400 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0 . 4 Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where : 1 ) Pcf is pounds per cubic foot 2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid • densities . GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC . The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 6 * For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0 . 002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred ( 100 ) psf should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure . The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only . The passive pressure given is appropriate only for the depth of level structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall . An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls . We recommend using a factor of safety of at least 1 . 5 for overturning and sliding . The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls . If these conditions exist , then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures . Also , if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls , then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures . Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall , unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment . Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be free-draining structural fill containing no organics . This backfill should contain no more than five (5 ) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter . The percentage of particles passing the No . 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent . Due to their high silt content, if the native sand soils are used as backfill , a drainage composite , such as Miradrain or Enkadrain , should be placed against the retaining walls . The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC. The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 7 behind the wall . The top foot to eighteen inches of the backfill should consist of a relatively impermeable soil or topsoil , or the surface should be paved . The sub- section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls . EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local , state , and national government safety regulations . Temporary cuts to a depth of about four (4 ) feet in unsaturated soils may be attempted vertically . Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296 , Part N , the soil type at the site would be classified as Type A . Therefore , temporary cut slopes greater than four feet in height cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 3/4 : 1 (Horizontal : Vertical ) extending continuously between the top and bottom of the cut . The above recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites having similar soil conditions . Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow construction of foundations , retaining walls , or utilities . These cut slopes should be backfilled or retained as soon as possible . All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2 : 1 ( H :V) . Fill slopes should not be constructed with an inclination greater than 2 : 1 (H :V) . Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slope. Also , all permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil . DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of footings where the floor is below the outside finish grade and at the base of earth retaining walls . These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one-inch-minus washed rock wrapped in non-woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N , Supac 4NP, or similar material ) . At the highest point , the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC. The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 8 bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 7 . No groundwater was observed during our field work . However , seepage into the planned excavation is possible , and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches , perforated pipe or French drains , or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation . The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes . Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations , slabs , or pavements are to be constructed . Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building , except where the area is paved . PAVEMENT AREAS All pavement sections may be supported on competent native soils or structural fill , provided these soils can be compacted to 95 percent density and are in a stable, non- yielding condition at the time of paving . Structural fill and/or fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet or unstable areas . We recommend using Supac 5NP, manufactured by Phillips Petroleum Company , or a non-woven fabric with equivalent strength and permeability characteristics . In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered , twelve ( 12) inches of granular structural fill will stabilize the subgrade except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required . The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants , Inc . after the site is stripped and cut to grade . Recommendations for compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub-section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement section for lightly loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of two (2) inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four (4 ) inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or three (3) inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) . We recommend that heavily loaded areas be provided with three (3) inches of AC GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC. The Quadrant Corp . JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 9 over six (6) inches of CRB or four (4) inches of ATB. The heavily loaded areas are typically main driveways and dumpster areas . The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations . We can provide recommendations based on expected traffic loads and R value tests , if requested . Some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected . To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical . GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL We recommend that the building and pavement areas be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation , all organic matter , and other deleterious material . The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill . Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building , behind permanent retaining or foundation walls , or in other areas where the underlying soils need to support loads . Geotech Consultants , Inc . should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of • any structural fill . All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content . The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density . The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process . The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type , compaction equipment used , and the number of passes made to compact the lift . In no case should the lifts exceed twelve ( 12) inches in loose thickness . The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill : GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC. The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 10 Minimum Relative Location of Fill Placement Compaction Beneath footings , slabs or 95% walkways Behind retaining walls 90% Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Where : Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio , expressed in percentages , of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor) . Use of On-Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather , or when the silty , on-site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill . The on-site soils are generally silty and thus are, moisture sensitive . Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content . The moisture content of the silty, on-site soils must be at or near the optimum moisture content as they cannot be consistently compacted to the required density when the moisture content is greater than optimum. The moisture content of the near-surface on-site soils at the time of our explorations was generally above the estimated optimum moisture content . The on-site sand or gravel soils underlying the topsoil could be used as structural fill if grading operations are conducted during dry weather and when drying of the wet soils by aeration is possible . During excessively dry weather it may be necessary to add water to achieve optimum moisture content . Moisture sensitive soils may also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC. The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 11 Ideally , structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles . The percentage of particles passing the No . 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. LIMITATIONS The analyses , conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soils encountered in the test pits are representative of the subsurface conditions of the site . If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in the explorations , we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits . Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations . Such unexpected conditions frequently require that additional expenditures be made to attain a properly constructed project . It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks . This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of The Quadrant Corporation and their representatives for specific application to this project and site . Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed , and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses . The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints . No warranty is expressed or implied . The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC. The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 12 not intended to direct the contractor' s methods , techniques , sequences or procedures , except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design . We recommend that this report , in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor . ADDITIONAL SERVICES It is recommended that Geotech Consultants , Inc . provide a general review of the geotechnical aspects of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and project specifications . It is also recommended that Geotech Consultants , Inc . be retained to provide geotechnical consultation , testing , and observation services during construction . This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration , to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the intent of contract plans and specifications , and to provide recommendations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction . However , our work will not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor , his employees or agents . Also , job and site safety , and dimensional measurements , will be the responsibility of the contractor . GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC. The Quadrant Corp. JN 93050 March 4 , 1993 Page 13 The following plates are attached and complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 6 Test Pit Logs Plate 7 Footing Drain Detail Respectfully submitted , GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC . J14//64--- Lloyd J . Reitz Geotechnical Engineer a w coto' , 47,1 min +`' G MoNALlw Mina [EXPIRES 8/ 17/ 93 James R . Finley, Jr . P . E. Principal Attachments LJR/JRF : cka GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC . ... . F1' rM311Y.1i• 1 III . I wit ,:;.2.....a..-1 to jt,�a '. �lM ST » . „u I i ffirM it .T11 u -> .11M K L - f' /.155 .,.4 11.11. I ` I 11/1. 1 T • T. t , i > g I " 01 sw ..,, , - 1f 1P15 SEA teal a n �„tuet S , 320TH .• ■N01P • 1.•ST - " • L •� a �� �; X iT n .• , � 1JCf/r��Yi"'::�::i:pii.�l:izr�F�rOH——__— . �. �, .T11I }. Ivor • ' NI,t•F. ,,-- AirP:,.1 •Iii CI. -.... , L. .V7i(016.: fr 1 s 01., .r. e • i.*,, I8,.•!'4fn!!I -4."..? 17 N. $rIM -Mr: _ ,. , > , 15 ' ? I • ` . I— .' 41— r; 4 '‘,.00k_- • 1 -- • �i — _" II— .. ,_ -• <——> / « ..._—— f SW 710 t 1 Ir!a. S 01 333Ito • ST EiLig .. -,,, .. 0 • TTMViii. !" I fpi 33174 ST P fill. i i . 1 ' i ::;,:"� KITTS i - ;Ili Hs cQ1 ,HER z PANTHER /// �,� I �' LAKE . :_:. i'ø 1 1 1- igi it ,v1 iii . ,. ,• , 4. '. ' 0;6 , ..." Geneva 1; 1 t r isim R .t • MUM IT _ 3�Tw VT 3I? '� I •,•'^1 w !T ' 5�.M1'�3�-a y 1 .11. . <.1.. ^ S>,� <",'r30TM ST"' i,> -r ._ ..- jM1�11T ST__7r——__ —__ _ — __. .. - , ■�� - J .4. 5 -1 T T 1tii . iw - o f . _ _ F�:�'3= "II 4. : A 'W A - " S r a U /. z # ,,. . . .. . _ . _ !... irll s _ TT S _t 35ITH 0 11. \ t � ' • S 3ATN / +I. L s i • N 11111zaN R $aOTKlT--O ——— ——tr. '—- ,• .——-- — �-- — - -sm., if O •= IYtM t► _ _. .. - .. �f 3 ,a 1M . R: S*1ST r� L i I , �' Es .- 3010 1 r ' p zR _ • j :>,.TM 3 Sw le6TM ST > O , r ` , yarn (.s. . t w k. 0 0 , = 'r -• /G ` . I < t f __ I. tRES1 AREA Z t r - J - -- L. '' ale S o VICINITY MAP GEOTECH S.333rd ST AT 8th AVE S - -44 CONSULTANTS FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON .lob No.' pert Lowe Byt Note: •,""` �� �- 93050 MAR 1993 1 'I' S. 333rd STREET ,,,io ,A__.__ ,--_--• __ I 1 1 I 01 ' TP-3 ' r r . I I 0 r \'` r I O / r ' — TP-4 rr / I ` 1,4 "- .1 PROPOSER // J BUILDING`1 — .', TP-5 ' 1 0 y i ,., ) /� .r W r �,,J 0 TP-2, I tZu ^. / r I > I Q , ''J I r J t r 1 1\ I i _ \•` FF— 347.0 I \ � TP-1 , 0 1 -- I / TP-6,,`, I I r I r 01 r I I I I / l 1 / \ I is*/ ` --- / 11i 1 S. 334th STREET 3vo LEGEND: 0 APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATIONS SITE EXPLORATION PLAN 4 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS S.333rd ST AT 8th AVE S FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON doe No.' Dole: Note: 93060 MAR 1993 2 1 �l TEST PIT 1 o e9 o`y Ode Elevation 0 00 USCS Description 0 Dark brown to black, silty SAND with organics, fine grained, `moist, loose(topsoil). 5.2 SM Reddish-tan, silty SAND with gravel and organics, fine grained, moist, loose(mostly fine roots-some larger ones) definite 5 _ \ organic layer at 3') •3 SM Gray, silty SAND with gravel, tine grained, moist, dense to very dense (glacial till). 10 — Test pit terminated at 8' below existing grade on 2-19-93. _ No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. Slight caving from 0 to 4'. 15 00 re TEST PIT 2 Qe, 4,00, Elevation 0 USCS Description Black to dark brown, silty SAND with organics, fine grained, very 4451,.moist, loose (topsoil). 3r.'r.44- Tan, silty SAND with gravel and some organics, fine grained, very \moist, medium-dense. 5 — :SMJ• Tan to gray, silty SAND with gravel, tine grained, moist, dense. -becomes gray in color, very dense (difficult to excavate) Test pit terminated at 7' below existing grade on 2-19-93. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. • 10 15 TEST PIT LOGS GEOTECH SOUTH 333RD ST & 8TH AVE SOUTH CONSULTANTS. INC. FEDERAL WAY, WA Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 93050 FEB 1993 LJR 3 `e��``\ TEST PIT 3 � Elevation o �`c Gec USCS Description 0 _ Dark brown to black, silty SAND with organics, fine grained, very moist, loose(topsoil). •• Tan, silty SAND with gravel, fine grained, very SM moist, medium dense(weathered till). 5 Gray, silty SAND with gravel, fine grained, moist, dense sM (glacial till). Test pit terminated at 8' below existing grade on 2-19-93. 10 — No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. 15 _ `r��1 e�``�o� TEST PIT 4 0Q . (`� Elevation Ge USCS Description 0 _ Black to dark brown, silty SAND with organics, fine grained, _ 3.6 S moist, loose (topsoil). SM Reddish-tan, slightly silty SAND with gravel, fine to medium grained, \moist, loose. 5 — Ism Gray, silty SAND with gravel, fine grained, moist, dense. (glacial till) 10 -- Test pit terminated at 8' below existing grade on 2-19-93. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. 15 — TEST PIT LOGS '40 GEOTECH SOUTH 333RD ST & 8TH AVE SOUTH CONSULTANTS. INC. FEDERAL WAY, WA Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 93050 FEB 1993 LJR 4 0 ie���ao\ • TEST PIT 5 e `� (�� Elevation Gc USCS Description 0 Dark brown, silty SAND with organics, fine grained, 9.0 ` moist, loose(topsoil). r Tan, silty SAND with gravel and organics, fine grained, moist, medium-dense (weathered till) 5 .— 8.0 8.1 aGray, silty SAND with gravel, fine grained, moist, dense (glacial till). 10 _ Test pit terminated at 8' below existing grade on 2-19-93. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. 15 `J§e e�l`Il TEST PIT 6 oeQ 4o`GDet Elevation 0 USCS Description _ Dark brown, silty SAND with organics, tine grained, 10.4 :® loose (topsoil). Reddish tan to tan, silty SAND with gravel and some organics, fine .. 7\grained, moist, medium-dense. (weathered till) 5 — 9.8 Gray, silty SAND with gravel, fine grained, moist, dense. s1 (glacial till) — 6.6 10 — Test pit terminated at 10.5' below existing grade on 2-19-93. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. 15 _ TEST PIT LOGS GEOTECH SOUTH 333RD ST & 8TH AVE SOUTH CONSULTANTS.rnrrti, INC. FEDERAL WAY, WA Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 93050 FEB 1993 LJR 5 1 op� TEST PIT 7 `eQ�r`� p‘ ��c`` e 0 Gp Elevation USCS Description 0 Dark brown , silty SAND with organics, fine grained, _ 9.8 \moist, loose (topsoil). Reddish-tan to gray, silty SAND with gravel and organics, fine grained, moist, loose to medium-dense(weathered till) (tree roots) 5 ,— — 7.6 SM Gray, silty SAND with gravel, fine grained, moist, dense to very • dense (glacial till). 10 _ Test pit terminated at 9' below existing grade on 2-19-93. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. 15,_ TEST PIT LOGS GEOTECH SOUTH 333RD ST & 8TH AVE SOUTH CONSULTANTS, INC. FEDERAL WAY, WA Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 93050 FEB 1993 LJR 6 Slope backfi// away from foundo/ion --- - TIGHTL/NE ROOF DRAIN ISr Do not connect to footing drain. BACKF/L L See text for VAPOR BARR/ER requirements. WASHED ROCK — 0.° .'a "� %� `; 4"min. 6 min__ l.;__•. ' FREE-ORA/N/NC SAND/GRAVEL NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC --- 4"PERFORATED HARD PVC PIPE Invert at /east as low as footing and/or crow/ space. Slope to drain. Place weepho/es downward. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL GEOTECH 5.333rd ST AT 8th AVE S CONSULTANTS FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Job No.: Dole: Seale, Prole 93050 MAR 1993 N.T.S. 7 CITY OF • ��F11.._ FRY33530 1ST WAY SOUTH • FEDERAL WAY,WASHINGTON 98003 June 23, 1993 Randy Hamblin The Quadrant Corporation P.O. Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 RE: Paragon Office and Research Facility File No. UPR93-0007 Dear Mr. Hamblin: On May 27, 1993, members of the Community Development Review Committee (CDRC) met to discuss your application. This committee includes representatives from the Federal Way Water and Sewer, Fire and School Districts, and staff from the City's planning, public works, building and parks departments. The following is a summary of comments from our meeting. For your convenience, I have listed comments under categories of site plan requirements, code requirements, and SEPA review. Comment sheets from CDRC members are also enclosed. Where appropriate, I have noted pertinent ordinance sections (these do not include all regulations applicable to the subject proposal). In order to continue and expedite the processing of your application, the following shall be submitted: Site Plan Requirements Per requirement VI.E, details for dumpster screening, if any, have not been provided. See attached Site Plan Review information. Code Requirements 1. Existing lot lines cross the proposed property and shall be depicted on a site plan. A lot line elimination is required prior to building permit issuance. See attached handout. 2. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1441.a, wherever feasible, the building(s) on the subject property should be located between the street and the parking area(s). It is an applicant's responsibility to demonstrate why this requirement can not be met. J. 3. The proposed Landscaping Plan does not conform with recently adopted Article XVII, Landscape Section of the City Code. Pursuant to the recently adopted FWCC Section 22-1566.h, Landscaping Requirement by Zoning District, a Type III landscaping ten (10) feet in width is required along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. The proposal meets the width requirement, however, the requirement to plant Type III landscaping and screen for rights-of-way per Section 22-1567.e has not been met. In addition, the landscape strip along the west edge of the site also requires Type III landscaping. Additional landscape requirements include such items as: 1) Screening of loading areas with Type I landscaping, Section 22-1564.w; 2) establishing slopes at a three to one (3;1) ratio for lawn areas, Section 22-1564.c; 3) enclosing all trash receptacles, Section 22-1564.d; and 4) 25% of new landscape materials (i.e. trees, shrubs and groundcover) shall be drought tolerant. The plant schedule should identify any materials used to meet this requirement. See Section 22-1567 of the new ordinance contains requirements related to interior lot landscaping. As proposed, landscape islands do not meet the requirement to plant trees, shrubs and groundcover in each island. Such vegetation is required to be drought tolerant. In addition, lawn is not permitted in landscape islands of less than two hundred (200) square feet, and then, only as an accessory planting material to required trees, shrubs, and other groundcovers. Please see new landscape code for additional landscape requirements. 4. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1543.b, any new driveway curb cuts onto public rights-of-way are required to have a 150-foot separation from any other existing driveways on both sides of the street. See Note 4 of the attached memorandum from Ron Garrow, Senior Planner with the Department of Public Works. 5. Per Ordinance #92-158, solid waste and recycling storage spaces are required to be included in all new commercial developments. Depict garbage collection and storage or recycling areas if located outside. 6. The proposed preliminary grading and utility plan depicting the number of trees to remain also needs to depict and state how many significant trees exist and will be removed. In addition, it appears that grading will take place within the drip line of trees proposed to be saved. See new landscape ordinance contains management practices observed to protect trees to be saved. J' . State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Review The proposal is currently under SEPA review. Additional information and/or required changes to the site or landscape plans mentioned above are required prior to the issuance of the SEPA determination. The following code related items are for your information. Code Requirements 1. The site is zoned OP, Office Park. I have enclosed a copy of the Office Park (OP) chapter of the city code which provides some of the specific design requirements for Office Developments (refer to FWCC Article VI, Division 9, Section 22-826). Requirements listed on the chart provide special design requirements related to this specific type of use. Other chapters of the zoning code related to specific design standards for parking, landscaping, signage, or other elements can be obtained at the Department of Community Development. Impervious coverage is now 100%, excluding all code related requirements (e.g. landscaping, surface water retention/detention, etc.). 2. A copy of any easements or plat or zoning conditions which may have been imposed on the property by King County, if any, shall be submitted. 3. Pursuant to Note 4 of the OP Chapter, any facade of a structure that exceeds 60 feet in length must be modulated as follows: a) the minimum depth of the modulation is 4 feet, b) the minimum width of the modulation is 5 feet, the maximum width of the modulation is 50 feet. As proposed, subject building meets this requirement. 4. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1445.b, the applicant shall design the parking area so that there is a paved sidewalk, at least five feet in width and unobstructed, between every other row of parking spaces and between any building and abutting driveway or parking spaces. Additional sidewalks will be required as part of the SEPA process and/or site plan review. 5. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1564.a, if any portion of a lot is not proposed for buildings, future buildings, parking, storage or accessory uses and proposed landscaped areas, that portion shall be retained in a "native" or pre-developed state. 6. FWCC Section 22-949, provides standards for placement and screening of garbage receptacles and dumpsters. Section 22-960 provides standards for screening of rooftop appurtenances. Community Development Review Committee (CDRC) Comment sheets from CDRC members are also enclosed. These comments are applicable to the application as proposed. If you have questions regarding specific requirements, you may reach each committee representative at the following phone numbers. Federal Way Department of Public Works Ron Garrow, Senior Engineer - 661-4137 Federal Way Building Division Dick Mumma, Building Official - 661-4112 Federal Way Water and Sewer Rick Gilmore, Supervisor of Technical Services - 941-1516 King County Fire District #39 Pat Kettenring, Assistant to the Fire Marshal - 839-6234 If you have any questions, please call me at 661-4109. Sincerely tephe Clifton Senior Planner Enclosures: a) Comment Sheet from Ron Garrow, Senior Engineer, dated 6/15/1993. b) Comment Sheet from Dick Mumma, Building Official, dated 5/18/1993. c) Comment Sheet from Rick Gilmore, Supervisor of Technical Services, dated 5/27/1993. d) Comment Sheet from Chris Ingham, Fire Marshall Office, dated 5/27/1993. e) A copy of the OP chapter of the city code relating to proposed project. f) Site Plan Review and major steps bulletins. g) Lot line elimination handout. I\...paragon\pre93007.pal vF • vv PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM TO: Stephen Clifton FROM: Ron Garrow For Your Information DATE: June 15, 1993 SUBJECT: Paragon Office and Research Facility, UPR93-0007 (Revised) The applicant has provided a site plan, SEPA checklist, legal description, and a Level 1 Downstream Analysis. These items were reviewed and the following comments are provided for inclusion into the staffs letter back to the applicant: SEPA Issues: 1. Prior to SEPA determination, a written narrative of the relevance to the site of the 7 Core and 12 Special Requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) must be submitted for review and comment. Any site plan changes as a result of the conclusions to the narrative shall be reflected in a new plan to be submitted for review and approval. 2. On-site detention shall be required per the KCSWDM unless regional detention is provided in Lake No. 1 as currently proposed by the Quadrant Corporation. Construction of the Paragon development will not be permitted until the detention facility is constructed by Quadrant Corporation and approved by the City, unless the Paragon development includes a designed detention facility in the construction plans. The design of the on-site detention facilities shall conform to recommendation BW-2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan. Bonding for this eventuality will not be accepted as an alternative. 3. Prior to issuance of the SEPA determination, the Traffic Impact Analysis submitted by the applicant must be reviewed by the staff for acceptance and quantifying any impact mitigation fees. Site Plan Review: 4. The southerly driveway entrances to the site do not meet the 150-foot separation requirements of Section 22-1543(b). The driveways must be separated from any intersection or other driveway by 150 feet. Measurements for these criteria are taken from centerline of the driveway to the closest face of the curb at the nearby intersection or the centerline of any other driveways. If the locations are not modified to comply • . with this requirem administrative approval of a written lest for a modification of the requirements must be obtained per Section 22-1477. A written request may be submitted to Mr. Ronald Garrow, Senior Development Engineer, addressing the decisional criteria listed in the section. An approval of such a request is not guaranteed. 5. A Lot Line Elimination shall be completed for the affected properties to eliminate all internal common property lines. Cost of this process is $100 plus recording fees. The attached handout shall be followed in preparing the materials to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to recording. 6. All drawings submitted for review and approval for both the site plan and building permits shall be put on 24" x 36" sheets and not on 30" x 42". The drawings for the site plan shall be prepared using an engineering scale and for this particular case may be done at 1"=30' since there are no public improvements and the entire site would more fit onto one sheet thereby simplifying the review of the plans. I /P1 'r-DF�VELOP IN IENT L\FOR\1,AmTON • EDERAL WAY BUILDING SECTII 661-4118 • I • • ?ARAC7o 4 $-a V i - spwk/e7IGp P1tOJECT NAME OCCUPANCY TYPE CONSTRUCTION 'A-.--- `' Submit with completed application for permit, seven complete sets of plans of 24"x36" maximum dimension (include architectural, structural,electrical,drainage,utilities,and landscaping). Provide three, each 81/2"x11" and three full size site plans for addressing multiple building sites. 2At submittal provide L Q sets of structural calculations prepared by a professional engineer, registered in the State of Washington. ✓3. At submittal provide two copies of soil investigations and reports, as specified in Chapter 29 of the Uniform Building Code. 4. At submittal provide two sets of energy code calculations, including lighting budget. Washington State Energy Code (1991). 5. Provide two copies of King County Health Department approved drawings. . "b`.---- At the time of submittal, those regulations which are currently in effect shall be applicable to all project plans and specifications. The City of Federal Way has currently adopted all Uniform Codes, 1991 editions. - . .- Washington State Barrier Free Standards apply. /i%4 -5/aO . Special inspection by an approved testing laboratory is required for site welding, high-strength bolting, piling operations,sprayed-on fireproofing, structural masonry,and cast-in-place concrete. Include testing Iab form and personnel credentials with building permit submittal for Building Section approval prior to construction. 9. Separate permits are required for demolition, signs, rack storage, rockeries, etc., refer to Washington State Department of L & I for electrical permits. Plumbing and mechanical should be included on the main application for permits, described in al above. 101 Revisions to submitted drawings will be subject to additional plan review fees, if on larger sheets than �81A"x11". 1!11. Minimum estimated fireflow (gpm) / 56 �P/77 _ 12. Provide TWO FULL SIZE SITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE 1—.EDERAL WAY POSTMASTER, showing approved locations, when installing gang-type mail boxes. 13. No building or portion of a building shall be occupied or used for storage prior to the issuance of the CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 14. No work shall start prior to the issuance of the permit. 15. Other: .S"—ye— 1-, PREPARED BY DATE ru Dry. + COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA OF: May 27 , 1993 ATTN: Stephen Clifton Senior Planner FROM: Federal Way Water and Sewer SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 2 - Paragon Office & Research Facility -- Site Plan Review COMMENTS: Water: The addition of water facilities for hydrants or fire protection will require a developer extension agreement with the District. Sewer: Sewer service may be possible by side sewer connection only, provided maximum length of side sewer is less than 200 feet and minimum slope of 2% can be maintained. An Industrial User Survey ( IUS) will be required to be com- pleted prior to connecting to the District system. Pretreatment requirements, if any, will be determined upon evaluation of the IUS. By: Date: S �7 �3 TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMERCIAL Agenda Date: May 27, 1993 Subject: Paragon Office and Research Facility To: Stephen Clifton From: Chris Ingham, Fire Marshal's Office WATER SUPPLIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION When any portion of the facility or building protected is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. [UFC 10.401] 2C Hydrants shall be located not more than 300 feet on center. Such distances shall be measured on the path of vehicular access. [Administrative Policy 10.004] X Hydrants shall not be located closer than 50 feet to any building. [Administrative Policy 10.004] x When exposed to vehicular damage, fire hydrants shall be suitably protected. [UFC 10.105d] X Curb areas in front of hydrants or Fire Department Connections may be marked fifteen (}) feet on either side as fire lanes. [KCFPR #111] ao Hydrants shall not be obstructed by any structure or vegetation, nor shall the - visibility of the hydrant be impaired for a distance of 50 feet in the direction of vehicular approach to the fire hydrant. [Administrative Policy 10.004] X Fire hydrant locations are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal or his/her designee. [Administrative Policy 10.004] D( Fire hydrants shall be in service PRIOR to the start of combustible construction. [UFC 10.502] • X Existing fire hydrants on public streets are allowed to be considered as available for the project. Existing fire hydrants on adjacent properties shall not be considered available unless fire apparatus access roads extend between properties and easements are established to prevent obstructions of such roads. [UFC Appendix III-B] A Certificate of Water Availability shall be provided indicating the fire flow available at the site. [UFC 10.402] J0 0 , tilt has been determined this project will require hydrants. existing 1 o t2� hydrants are considered available to this project. This will require the addition of i hydrants for this project. [UFC Appendix III-B] OP FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADWAY X_ Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. [UFC 10.202] During construction, an all-weather fire department access roadway is required when any portion of an exterior wall of any facility, building or portion of a building is more than 150 feet from a fire department access roadway. [UFC 10.203] t) k EXCEPTION: provisions for a sprinklered building. All fire department access roadways shall be constructed of an all-weather surface capable of supporting a 25 ton vehicle; the maximum roadway grade shall not exceed 12 percent. 04- All fire department access roadways shall have (1) a clear and unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet, (2) an overhead clearance of not less than 13 feet six inches, (3) all turns or bends shall be designed at not less than a 32 foot inside and 40 foot outside turning radius. X All fire department access roadways which have dead ends exceeding 150 feet shall be provided with a cul-de-sac at the dead end. All such cul-de-sacs shall be not less than 80 feet in diameter. XDesignated fire lanes may be required for emergency access. This may be done during the plans check or after the facility is in operation. • When required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof. [UFC 10.206] FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS TO BUILDINGS V Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. [UFC 10.301] When access to or within a structure or area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or firefighting purposes, the chief is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an accessible location. The key box shall be a type approved by the chief and shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required. [UFC 10.302] AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS An automatic fire sprinkler system is required in all buildings where the total floor area included within the surrounding exterior walls on all floor levels, including basements, exceeds 10,000 square feet. oC The automatic fire sprinkler system shall be tied into the fire alarm system (last zone) in all buildings having an automatic fire detection system. Fire Department Connections shall be located at the front of the building(s) or structure(s) served; not located on the walls of the building(s) or structure(s); and shall be identified as to the type . of system served. Fire Department Connections shall not be located more than 50 feet from a fire hydrant and shall be located on the same side of the road as the fire hydrant. D(- Fire Department Connections shall be located not less than 18 inches nor more than 120 inches from the finished edge of an approved roadway or fire lane. The inlets shall be not less than 18 inches nor more than 36 inches above the finished grade. X, The inlets shall face the driving surface and be protected with caps. AUTOMATIC FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM An automatic fire detection system is required in all buildings exceeding 3,000 square feet gross floor area. This system shall be monitored by an approved central station and/or remote station conforming to the current requirements of the National Fire Protection Association standards and/or the Fire Marshal or his/her designee. / Group A, Division 1, 2 and 2.1 Occupancies shall be provided with a manual Of alarm system. EXCEPTION: Group A Occupancy portions of Group E Occupancies are allowed to have alarms as required for Group E Occupancies. Activation of the manual fire alarm shall immediately initiate an approved prerecorded message announcement using an approved electrically supervised voice communication or public address system which is audible above the ambient noise level of the occupancy. EXCEPTION: When approved by the chief, the prerecorded announcement is allowed to be manually deactivated for a period of time not to exceed 3 minutes for the sole purpose of allowing a live voice announcement from an approved, constantly attended station. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: px0 vwit /'t S OS (i ri-r,, 4,9e.. $ wrr Dotr-At simr.17-5) ,4 MfITiZe.oles /biz ice- Sroe/WA60.4,0 o /t- >�,( dv/G.c2,wC- .sia,2ll .e $ //fiC add:' 7. /,2 eC C.o*Ore /4€47_ THESE COMMENTS VALID FOR 180 DAYS FROM REVIEW AND ONLY FOR THE PLANS REVIEWED. CIR,5 / / ' i 5- - z7 ?3 Reviewed by: Review Date: • r. • • • i t ,t r r', . s i ' v. , - 'r . 4,1-k•1i1 -f„ i` fe y ` . a — . _ ', a , <. fi >"'i* d 1, i': _''" � Lw \ rt, *r t X SITE PLAN REVIEW r r. I. GENERAL A. -Completed mastery application form: ti. B. Application fees ,, s;.- C. Agent authorization, if application is not signed by owner D. Signatures of all,persons with ownership interest in the property, if more than' one, ` ' `. E. Vicinity map with labeled streets and north arrow;. -" F. -Freight and,total gross floor area for all proposed floors or levels r, eti > Site ales. 1 t [ • b- •., x ,. - e B. 'Site'coverage of st uCtures,,total_Impervious surface area itd landscape,areas (expressed as•a percentage (%) of site area) _• I r 'Other. information :relating ;to design and sitiri g of proposed development - (including site cross sections)..may be-required J ttof tlesi tent isrequet$d r - •� _ {•A statement gnin s. \ 2 i iraCfi [ • l K Sub'iittal of ph�of the- ite foreach compass•point ;S� ... keyed ` :� to a site plan is enG „, fi . ` • - =� x x° ,, 2 { • y o-Ta'✓ 'Y. 4,. 1 .x Y -y' i L!4r ,, '4 t '� is x 2, r:f ,; ". �'1'• .' .vr•Y .F' ,t d.x r;.� �`� i .I. a 1.,..,' ,,,>. '�9,,.[� i, �}� -',r ,s w t �101�k � BC•coi�bii xR)C ,,.✓ r J�_ _ y s t' "lam^R_ „z t a; x q y, 4 xA 1':3a! 'bR�' r .i 7 [' ;,:,;c r.� �LL t•.• ' ' t,9 r y ,3 ^a w-;,� { . A.'c Mks ws:"-'!sue.- .� y � � ,.-�4 a x 's t "{� � J - s� a ,J. CS...i-,•. °• r'` ,—,'^ -� -_, ^'i 4 ,. r ', t+ }i..4• :` \f��( -� t ,t t _' ytx,• it 1-_ v ,4vix•r, 1-aY �.',,. s .. w , :: -- �' fi-,'',tick.' t'y , ti_ -.i '' �F... w u •e J .,.t �9. - '� f's-i.�'a t''\.. '�ys '� - - j F V L�, S 1t: p. '.l y is Jl •1 •-``i fie Z ' •335i018Y-WAY SOUTH i_P u.w x,'WASH(NGTON 98003 ,i;(206).66.1t4000• ' `"V - `Recycled Paper sed easements.G. Existing and/or propo H. Plan view of existing and proposed structures, including utility boxes and mechanical equipment. , I. Existing utilities: water, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, fire hydrants. j. Dimensioned parking layout: circulation, driveway location (including any driveway within one-hundred fifty {150} feet of the site) and parking stalls. K. Preliminary grading plan with finished contours. L. Preliminary storm drainage control. V. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN A. Conceptual drawing indicating the existing vegetation to be retained. and the general location of new trees, shrubs_and groundcover to satisfy the landscaping and screening requirements of the zoning code. •Shrubs may be shown in masses on this preliminary plan rather than ind crating individual plants. Shrub masses should be differentiated by.. shrub `size (small, medium, large) and either evergreen or deciduous. .Trees should be indicated as either evergreen or deciduous: B.. Plant schedule providing the scientific name, common name, sizes and spacing of each plant.' Y «., �,�, �. w^ - C. Iocation and square footage of applicable'landscape area requirements. BUILDING ELEVATIONS A.- Front, rear and side building elevations of-proposed structures: B tterior wall openings C. Construction materials and colors 2" Y ,F � � S 7 Y n k A .l -c 4• f - ' . Mgt VI f °f 'Q-REGULATIONS LP N co a y �. 1� ��p oo=��Y~o �qpP�S.C�� SQUIRED CA ~ . Q.• aill0 ° I ° °n = REVIEK PROCESS �• • "'' 3. y x t'ifi= - Z o o N e �' l° sq w A N o a mS--1 N$ WT S!ZE 0 eD y N E. .a° ' .to . w G S o N cm o R I ; O ro< a` \ �Z tr A 7 \ J0uffl H1 \\g Cr r ii S S DE(each) a Oy 0 h Ge. sa °. CB IP L x A S. * LOT COVERAGE ( ) Z< e - cempno� fp (i: \ q.• �� S °° A b HEIGHT OF ■ ►-� n �' •ps °<�:� STRUCTURE w ^ n C . 4 ■ ' IC��I 'S7OLA\DSCAPE 3� X, z CATEGORYC Z ::CSIG\ rii O CATEGORY O (� N - g E Leo ro.-� aq y O ao Y :^OwagQ -1 REQUIRED w oa- y a_8 S 8 P g.a:_ PARKING SPACES �] F .— co X co cP • e to a_aa gagNB 1. a a-- c ag am i Gi p co P. g Er "Mg aa59.aP.,,1g .n3 °V 3Se'tOt a$o g N v==g 3S.rr°,..iia e.;;5. E g" ^a-S79 [[� 2 N E ::^ :w$.EiCc,0emXwSa ,7. ;OiQa?3 O N v 77q a 7 .°.E S` 7v _ Do 7 irt.d E x§we3e' axalg'g''.7°. ■°+ QaP O to m ..g .i 94 g`ea.eg a ..• 'a "'FOP, a a 7• = .gym ...pm. I go°g • .,C 73 .. �R ■_�p ! O E.a.°.■ 7... a 7 • S."0 : Z CD .:.NN 7 Q a g g .0s o 7• v. x = g;re l�aQvEr 'a7 a° a. B3 g i° a x tl!47 ..4 A I.., " .. e .. • ^6agt- COO, 3 •c ; g :. 0 3mg3 xga^m� c-° ° O ro 7 n -i �s" : a7 a T i - 8 TOp $Aoog ..mC iD�e ~ x 3� a s fD C• ? ga.c 3 C�. m co . 6 p A : e F. • auoo Lilo AVM'Iv2I U i I8 ll§ • EIGT y a U . -) Z r '0'REGULATIONS o S. T.I. to s Mai3: RKQUIRF.D 0 'il6"4 — REVIEW PROCESS w x T rm AA NJ 14 q►ii° ''Oa $ 8-.1 LOT SIZE 0 N sa. '�T� Z C I i0s+ee 3y U) C71• tig b 3 n N co.cali. ,17 Z tf C I`.� — FRONT �m x ^+ N N r m G. y G v 8 SIDE(racM O ! CD < C p T S REAR y E. c % LOT COVERAGE r 3 Z HEIGHT OF 3 m STRUCTURE y V. LANDSCAPE z N CATEGORY C 0 SIGNtrr- -1 CATEGORY p n z z REQUIRED PARKING SPACES ►3 F . . t . aee,'W�,eea 3+a aefoz�Qq o c oe - =n 'deeo'd e�Q3 ■Aeo.• 7 v3ae ;E -o pcm' aaaae a 3'3gozccF: a oare.4eF mo .� e •e4"i -374.$.es,°, s sill■° `e3�.a S�. e lei eelrrw.s "6 ii mea.■.* . .B3•.a„/3 ae_a I'd s-,-,-,0 3 Maeoa-a $ wS__.m a 3• o �} ,2:E g eg 9S80c*5.'F" -P,p°. eaTa eee■- n a2-°o a �3, :¢R+Ss, °, 4•g€40.gre333-■ A3°2e oe 9A9aeg r ■ T'1■ 1PIA.a'.. a1::o _.e a■owp�L4.S a A °'°i• ic�.c=°�°,Io ►�y $37�j 3S •3 �cn�E a e C m a �e9s37sm�m lJ 1a :t o■O 5 sc w 6°IL p 0 �..4�Lt.- nip C-3 ,e e ^ - . ££e R 0 21K 3 E r i�k$$" IL a *c3. - ° m o me"eeEo4.eece-�F w�w�o yVLIA fit UIJII strAig. e a [0 • a o c �e■ F .1Tm h tf _ a3-N m. 0° o*a'°° : ° e =o.mn-eea :c �c s+ d .ea ° �.-via.c o o •°. 3�c m ° •.� O N S• ,4 8 eo# T ! ■ Ec c 0 d T --a a.-=R.^ S R 2 OS=y _ .C -�Q 4 O a .. T . .B. a C oA e Z m T ,.42 g. N g 5=R S .8 E w a i 3 i 7" a 7 p e i 6 • oe 4 o.., m 9Z8-ZZ$ ONJ.NOZ CITY OF ECIEIMFIL VV /-17Y LOT LINE ELIMINATION The purpose of a lot line elimination is to remove interior lot lines of a parcel comprised of two or more separate lots with contiguous ownership. Lot line eliminations are reviewed administratively by the Public Works Department. The process usually takes approximately 30 days. This application packet is designed to obtain all the information necessary to allow the City of Federal Way to make a well-informed decision on your application. Please refer to the submittal requirements to determine the materials which must be submitted to complete your application. All application materials are public information. Your application will be evaluated on the basis of the information you provide and the criteria listed in the pertinent sections of the city's regulatory ordinances. Attached is a list of materials which must be submitted with your application. Consult with the Department of Public Works, 661-4131, if you have a question. Please do not turn in your application until all items on the list have been included. SUBMITTAL REOUIREMENTS I. GENERAL A. Completed, attached general application form signed by all vested owners. Agent authorization is required if application is not signed by the owner(s). Please include the names, addresses and phone numbers of all vested owners. B. Lot line elimination application'fee of $100. (Check made payable to "City of Federal Way".) C. Lot Line Elimination and Restrictive Covenant which has been fully executed and notarized by all vested owners. See attached form. D. Complete and accurate legal descriptions of the ORIGINAL parcels set forth in the Lot line Elimination and Restrictive Covenant. E. Complete and accurate legal description of the REVISED parcel set forth in the Lot line Elimination and Restrictive Covenant. F. Copy of a title report not more than one (1) year old or a copy of the deed conveying title to property owner(s). G. Two (2) copies of accurate, scaled drawings of the ORIGINAL and REVISED parcels meeting the requirements listed below. 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH • FEDERAL WILY, WASHINGTON 98003 • (206)661-4000 Recycled Paper • II. DRAWING REOUIRG,.fENTS The drawing sheet size shall be eight and one half by eleven (8 1/2 x 11) inches in size, be drawn at an engineering scale of one (1) inch equals fifty (50) feet or larger. A larger sheet size may be used, if necessary, up to a maximum of 18" x 24". The drawings shall include the following information: (see attached sample) A. The ORIGINAL parcel lot lines shall be shown with heavy, solid lines. The location of all streets and structures shall be shown. The drawing shall clearly show property dimensions, distances from all structures to property lines and the use of all structures. B. The REVISED exterior parcel lot lines shall be shown with heavy, solid lines. The interior lot lines to be eliminated shall be shown with a light, dashed line. The location of all streets and structures shall be shown. The drawing shall clearly show property dimensions, distances from all structures to property lines and the use of all structures. C. A north arrow shall be shown on each drawing. The drawing shall be drawn with north oriented to the top of the sheet. D. Tax parcel numbers of the parcels being altered by the lot line elimination shall be shown. III. RECORDING The City shall record all approved lot line eliminations with the King County Division of Records and Elections. A copy of the documents, stamped with the recording number, shall be forwarded to the applicant, the file and the King County Department of Assessments for assessment purposes. All fees for such recording shall be paid by the applicant prior to recording. V. CAUTION • Applicants may wish to obtain a full title report and have the Lot Line Elimination and Restrictive Covenant and other application materials reviewed by an attorney, a licensed land surveyor and/or title officer to ensure that all deeds,legal descriptions and maps are correct and accurate and to fully understand the contents of all forms and documents. The accuracy of all deeds, legal descriptions and maps is the responsibility of the applicant. The City of Federal Way assumes no liability for any errors or complications that arise therefrom. The applicant understands that the result of recording the Lot Line Elimination and Restrictive Covenant may be used to prohibit subsequent conveyances of the property, in any form other than as the Revised parcel. 2 SAMPLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Insert your legal description for the Original Lots and the Revised Lot on page 1 of the Lot line Elimination and Restrictive Covenant form. ORIGINAL LOTS: Lot "A" Lot 74 Plat of Golden Acres as recorded under King County Auditor's No. 7908270310, subject to easement for ingress and egress recorded under Auditor's No. 7908270320. Lot "B" Lot 75 Plat of Golden Acres as recorded under King County Auditor's No. 7908270310, subject to easement for ingress and egress recorded under Auditor's No. 7908270320. (Obtain this information from your title report or your deed.) REVISED LOT: Lot 74 together with Lot 75 Plat of Golden Acres as recorded under King County Auditor's No. 7908270310, subject to easement for ingress and egress recorded with Auditor's No. 7908270320. MARYK\DOC\LOTLW E.LGL .. • . DRAWING , • ORIGINAL LOTS 1 73 1 2 50' - IA . l 74 0� l g l �uJ rs _ Z ' 3 '°i. %---1---c&-jr-f- ,1 JJJ I ...o ' 2 50' ' k. 1 76 1 .. _ • REVISED LOTS 1 N 1 73 I 2so' ti • o' A ,., „ I : . 0 zl LI 11 I Imo'' �. .��' .t✓ot4- 50 .c� °i. I o 7 1 C LOT LINE ELIMINATION AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT A. The undersigned party(s) is the owner(s) ("Property Owner") of certain real properties located in Federal Way, Washington, and legally described as follows: Lot "A" Lot "B" If there are additional lots, attach a separate sheet containing additional legal descriptions. ("Properties"). B. All structures on the Properties and all distances from all structures to Property lines are set forth in the drawing attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference; and C. Section 58.17.040(6) of the Revised Code of Washington allows the adjustment and alteration of lot lines between contiguous properties; NOW, THEREFORE, the Property Owner, in consideration of the mutual benefits to the foregoing Properties, agrees as follows: 1. Elimination of Lot Line. The Properties shall be combined to become one (1)lot, the common lot line(s) of the Properties shall be eliminated as set forth in Exhibit A, and the combined lot shall be legally described as follows: 2. Restrictive Covenant. Upon recordation of this Lot Line Elimination and upon any subsequent improvement to the Properties, the Property Owner acknowledges that the Properties are no longer separate lots and accordingly, cannot be individually assigned, transferred or conveyed to any party or entity, unless in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, codes and rules, including, without limitation, all subdivision requirements. This Lot Line Elimination shall not eliminate, remove or impact in any manner any easements, encroachments or other restrictions of records. 3. Binding Effect. This Lot Line Elimination and Restrictive Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Property Owner's successors in interest, heirs and assigns. DATED this day of , 19_ (Signature) (Signature) (Print Name of Property Owner) (Print Name of Property Owner) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. • COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me , known to me as the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledge that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein stated. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington Residing at My Commission Expires MA RYK\FORMS\LOTLINRC.FM - 2 - _ . DRAWING ORIGINAL LOTS REVISED LOTS • CITY OF r"'"'"'"' FILE • =im-zaRt__ \) pr5,33530 1ST WAY SOUTH • FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 June 23, 1993 Randy Hamblin The Quadrant Corporation P.O. Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 RE: Paragon Office and Research Facility File No. UPR93-0007 Dear Mr. Hamblin: On May 27, 1993, members of the Community Development Review Committee (CDRC) met to discuss your application. This committee includes representatives from the Federal Way Water and Sewer, Fire and School Districts, and staff from the City's planning, public works, building and parks departments. The following is a summary of comments from our meeting. For your convenience, I have listed comments under categories of site plan requirements, code requirements, and SEPA review. Comment sheets from CDRC members are also enclosed. Where appropriate, I have noted pertinent ordinance sections (these do not include all regulations applicable to the subject proposal). In order to continue and expedite the processing of your application, the following shall be submitted: Site Plan Requirements Per requirement VI.E, details for dumpster screening, if any, have not been provided. See attached Site Plan Review information. Code Requirements 1. Existing lot lines cross the proposed property and shall be depicted on a site plan. A lot line elimination is required prior to building permit issuance. See attached handout. 2. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1441.a, wherever feasible, the building(s) on the subject property should be located between the street and the parking area(s). It is an applicant's responsibility to demonstrate why this requirement can not be met. 3. The proposed Landscaping Plan does not conform with recently adopted Article XVII, Landscape Section of the City Code. Pursuant to the recently adopted FWCC Section 22-1566.h, Landscaping Requirement by Zoning District, a Type III landscaping ten (10) feet in width is required along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. The proposal meets the width requirement, however, the requirement . to plant Type III landscaping and screen for rights-of-way per Section 22-1567.e has not been met. In addition, the landscape strip along the west edge of the site also requires Type III landscaping. Additional landscape requirements include such items as: 1) Screening of loading areas with Type I landscaping, Section 22-1564.w; 2) establishing slopes at a three to one (3;1) ratio for lawn areas, Section 22-1564.c; 3) enclosing all trash receptacles, Section 22-1564.d; and 4) 25% of new landscape materials (i.e. trees, shrubs and groundcover) shall be drought tolerant. The plant schedule should identify any materials used to meet this requirement. See Section 22-1567 of the new ordinance contains requirements related to interior lot landscaping. As proposed, landscape islands do not meet the requirement to plant trees, shrubs and groundcover in each island. Such vegetation is required to be drought tolerant. In addition, lawn is not permitted in landscape islands of less than two hundred (200) square feet, and then, only as an accessory planting material to required trees, shrubs, and other groundcovers. Please see new landscape code for additional landscape requirements. 4. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1543.b, any new driveway curb cuts onto public rights-of-way are required to have a 150-foot separation from any other existing driveways on both sides of the street. See Note 4 of the attached memorandum from Ron Garrow, Senior Planner with the Department of Public Works. 5. Per Ordinance #92-158, solid waste and recycling storage spaces are required to be included in all new commercial developments. Depict garbage collection and storage or recycling areas if located outside. 6. The proposed preliminary grading and utility plan depicting the number of trees to remain also needs to depict and state how many significant trees exist and will be removed. In addition, it appears that grading will take place within the drip line of trees proposed to be saved. See new landscape ordinance contains management practices observed to protect trees to be saved. 2 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Review The proposal is currently under SEPA review. Additional information and/or required changes to the site or landscape plans mentioned above are required prior to the issuance of the SEPA determination. The following code related items are for your information. Code Requirements 1. The site is zoned OP, Office Park. I have enclosed a copy of the Office Park (OP) chapter of the city code which provides some of the specific design requirements for Office Developments (refer to FWCC Article VI, Division 9, Section 22-826). Requirements listed on the chart provide special design requirements related to this specific type of use. Other chapters of the zoning code related to specific design standards for parking, landscaping, signage, or other elements can be obtained at the Department of Community Development. Impervious coverage is now 100%, excluding all code related requirements (e.g. landscaping, surface water retention/detention, etc.). 2. A copy of any easements or plat or zoning conditions which may have been imposed on the property by King County, if any, shall be submitted. 3. Pursuant to Note 4 of the OP Chapter, any facade of a structure that exceeds 60 feet in length must be modulated as follows: a) the minimum depth of the modulation is 4 feet, b) the minimum width of the modulation is 5 feet, the maximum width of the modulation is 50 feet. As proposed, subject building meets this requirement. 4. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1445.b, the applicant shall design the parking area so that there is a paved sidewalk, at least five feet in width and unobstructed, between every other row of parking spaces and between any building and abutting driveway or parking spaces. Additional sidewalks will be required as part of the SEPA process and/or site plan review. 5. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1564.a, if any portion of a lot is not proposed for buildings, future buildings, parking, storage or accessory uses and proposed landscaped areas, that portion shall be retained in a "native" or pre-developed state. 6. FWCC Section 22-949, provides standards for placement and screening of garbage receptacles and dumpsters. Section 22-960 provides standards for screening of rooftop appurtenances. 4, ' _OA - Community Development Review Committee (CDRC) Comment sheets from CDRC members are also enclosed. These comments are applicable to the application as proposed. If you have questions regarding specific requirements, you may reach each committee representative at the 'following phone numbers. federal Way Department of Public Works Ron Garrow, Senior Engineer - 661-4137 Federal Way Building Division Dick Mumma, Building Official - 661-4112 Federal Way Water and Sewer Rick Gilmore, Supervisor of Technical Services - 941-1516 King County Fire District #39 Pat Kettenring, Assistant to the Fire Marshal - 839-6234 If you have any questions, please call me at 661-4109. Sincerely, r/. Stephe Clifton Senior Planner Enclosures: a) Comment Sheet from Ron Garrow, Senior Engineer, dated 6/15/1993. b) Comment Sheet from Dick Mumma, Building Official, dated 5/18/1993. c) Comment Sheet from Rick Gilmore, Supervisor of Technical Services, dated 5/27/1993. d) Comment Sheet from Chris Ingham, Fire Marshall Office, dated 5/27/1993. e) A copy of the OP chapter of the city code relating to proposed project. f) Site Plan Review and major steps bulletins. g) Lot line elimination handout. I\...paragon\pre93007.pal 4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY TECHNICAL COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: May 12, 1993 TO: Community Development Review Committee (CDRC) Members Kathy McClung, Land Use Administrator Greg Moore, Development Services Coordinator Ron Garrow, Senior Engineer Joe Stevens, Parks Director Dick Mumma, Building Official Rick Gilmore, Supervisor of Technical Services, FW Water and Sewer Pat Kettenring, Assistant to the Fire Marshal, KC Fire District #39 Brent Beden, Operations Lieutenant, FW Police Department Max Osburn, Administrations Lieutenant, FW Police Department Linda Becker, FW School District #210 FROM: Stephen Clifton, Senior Planner PROJECT PLANNER: Stephen Clifton PHONE NO.: 661-4109 PLEASE RESPOND BY: May 27, 1993 - Pre-App with Applicant ********************************************************************** TYPE OF PERMIT REQUIRED: Site Plan Approval Sepa Review Use Process III approval. FILE NO.: SEP93-0009 PRE93-0007 PROJECT NAME: Paragon Office and Research Facility PROJECT ADDRESS: 750 South 344th Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct an 88,130 square foot, two story office and research facility on a 5.8 acre site. The Site is zoned Office Park (OP). • APPLICANT: PHONE NO.: Randy Hamblin The Quadrant Corporation P.O. Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 (206) 455-2900 • PROJECT BACKGROUND: I have polaroid pictures of the site if anyone wishes to look at them. In addition, a copy of the Level I One Downstream Analysis and Traffic Impact Analysis prepared as part of the application is being forwarded to the Department of Public Works. SEPA: Required. � r ********************************************************************** COMMENTS: ********************************************************************** (Please Attach Any Additional Comments) SIGNED: DATE: sc VIII / UPR93007.drc I • GTY OF 6111111111111Mat �= ESE PUBLIC WORKS vv Fly MEMORANDUM TO: Stephen Clifton FROM: Ron Garrow • For Your Information DATE: June 15, 1993 SUBJECT: Paragon Office and Research Facility, UPR93-0007 (Revised) The applicant has provided a site plan, SEPA checklist, legal description, and a Level 1 Downstream Analysis. These items were reviewed and the following comments are provided for inclusion into the staffs letter back to the applicant: SEPA Issues: 1. Prior to SEPA determination, a written narrative of the relevance to the site of the 7 Core and 12 Special Requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM) must be submitted for review and comment. Any site plan changes as a result of the conclusions to the narrative shall be reflected in a new plan to be submitted for review and approval. 2. On-site detention shall be required per the KCSWDM unless regional detention is provided in Lake No. 1 as currently proposed by the Quadrant Corporation. Construction of the Paragon development will not be permitted until the detention facility is constructed by Quadrant Corporation and approved by the City, unless the Paragon development includes a designed detention facility in the construction plans. The design of the on-site detention facilities shall conform to recommendation BW-2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan. Bonding for this eventuality will not be accepted as an alternative. 3. Prior to issuance of the SEPA determination, the Traffic Impact Analysis submitted by the applicant must be reviewed by the staff for acceptance and quantifying any impact mitigation fees. Site Plan Review: 4. The southerly driveway entrances to the site do not meet the 150-foot separation requirements of Section 22-1543(b). The driveways must be separated from any intersection or other driveway by 150 feet. Measurements for these criteria are taken from centerline of the driveway to the closest face of the curb at the nearby intersection or the centerline of any other driveways. If the locations are not modified to comply with this requiremdministrative approval of a writtenst for a modification of the requirements must be obtained per Section 22-1477. A written request may be submitted to Mr. Ronald Garrow, Senior Development Engineer, addressing the decisional criteria listed in the section. An approval of such a request is not guaranteed. 5. A Lot Line Elimination shall be completed for the affected properties to eliminate all internal common property lines. Cost of this process is $100 plus recording fees. The attached handout shall be followed in preparing the materials to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to recording. 6. All drawings submitted for review and approval for both the site plan and building permits shall be put on 24" x 36" sheets and not on 30" x 42". The drawings for the site plan shall be prepared using an engineering scale and for this particular case may be done at 1"=30' since there are no public improvements and the entire site would more fit onto one sheet thereby simplifying the review of the plans. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMERCIAL Agenda Date: May 27, 1993 Subject: Paragon Office and Research Facility To: Stephen Clifton From: Chris Ingham, Fire Marshal's Office WATER SUPPLIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION When any portion of the facility or building protected is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. [UFC 10.401] Hydrants shall be located not more than 300 feet on center. Such distances shall be measured on the path of vehicular access. [Administrative Policy 10.004] X Hydrants shall not be located closer than 50 feet to any building. [Administrative Policy 10.004] X When exposed to vehicular damage, fire hydrants shall be suitably protected. [UFC 10.105d] X Curb areas in front of hydrants or Fire Department Connections may be marked fifteen (y51 feet on either side as fire lanes. [KCFPR #111] ao °(. Hydrants shall not be obstructed by any structure or vegetation, nor shall the visibility of the hydrant be impaired for a distance of 50 feet in the direction of vehicular approach to the fire hydrant. [Administrative Policy 10.004] X Fire hydrant locations are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal or his/her designee. [Administrative Policy 10.004] Fire hydrants shall be in service PRIOR to the start of combustible construction. [UFC 10.502] 74- Existing fire hydrants on public streets are allowed to be considered as available for the project. Existing fire hydrants on adjacent properties shall not be considered available unless fire apparatus access roads extend between properties and easements are established to prevent obstructions of such roads. [UFC Appendix III-B] A Certificate of Water Availability shall be provided indicating the fire flow available at the site. [UFC 10.402] JX° / 0 1 - i'It has been determined this project will require hydrants. existing i o A� hydrants are considered available to this project. This will require the addition of f hydrants for this project. [UFC Appendix III-B] o lit FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADWAY X. Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. [UFC 10.202] 'A During construction, an all-weather fire department access roadway is required when any portion of an exterior wall of any facility, building or portion of a building is more than 150 feet from a fire department access roadway. [UFC 10.203] f✓ 4 EXCEPTION: provisions for a sprinklered building. All fire department access roadways shall be constructed of an all-weather surface capable of supporting a 25 ton vehicle; the maximum roadway grade shall not exceed 12 percent. 04- All fire department access roadways shall have (1) a clear and unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet, (2) an overhead clearance of not less than 13 feet six inches, (3) all turns or bends shall be designed at not less than a 32 foot inside and 40 foot outside turning radius. All fire department access roadways which have dead ends exceeding 150 feet shall be provided with a cul-de-sac at the dead end. All such cul-de-sacs shall be not less than 80 feet in diameter. 7( Designated fire lanes may be required for emergency access. This may be done during the plans check or after the facility is in operation. When required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof. [UFC 10.206] FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS TO BUILDINGS )( Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. [UFC 10.301] When access to or within a structure or area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or firefighting purposes, the chief is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an accessible location. The key box shall be a type approved by the chief and shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required. [UFC 10.302] AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS An automatic fire sprinkler system is required in all buildings where the total floor area included within the surrounding exterior walls on all floor levels, including basements, exceeds 10,000 square feet. 0( The automatic fire sprinkler system shall be tied into the fire alarm system (last zone) in all buildings having an automatic fire detection system. )(/ Fire Department Connections shall be located at the front of the building(s) or structure(s) served; not located on the walls of the building(s) or structure(s); and shall be identified as to the type of system served. X\ Fire Department Connections shall not be located more than 50 feet from a fire hydrant and shall be located on the same side of the road as the fire hydrant. D(' Fire Department Connections shall be located not less than 18 inches nor more than 120 inches from the finished edge of an approved roadway or fire lane. The inlets shall be not less than 18 inches nor more than 36 inches above the finished grade. X The inlets shall face the driving surface and be protected with caps. AUTOMATIC FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM k An automatic fire detection system is required in all buildings exceeding 3,000 square feet gross floor area. This system shall be monitored by an approved central station and/or remote station conforming to the current requirements of the National Fire Protection Association standards and/or the Fire Marshal or his/her designee. / Group A, Division 1, 2 and 2.1 Occupancies shall be provided with a manual el alarm system. EXCEPTION: Group A Occupancy portions of Group E Occupancies are allowed to have alarms as required for Group E Occupancies. Activation of the manual fire alarm shall immediately initiate an approved prerecorded message announcement using an approved electrically supervised voice communication or public address system which is audible above the ambient noise level of the occupancy. EXCEPTION: When approved by the chief, the prerecorded announcement is allowed to be manually deactivated for a period of time not to exceed 3 minutes for the sole purpose of allowing a live voice announcement from an approved, constantly attended station. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: pA'0'(,ate /"I SOS (frtArd/1/,9G 5,9,�-�i, - DAi�,4 S<fi1/1 s) 1;4 /14/i1-if e5 �i2/a.5-- STo/1/zz2/#(41-,�0410 //v 7-d/2 gv/c<>/ti c-- 5 d/2 ,e sfj 4C '44ed 7----/,z re Co ore /4e4'. THESE COMMENTS VALID FOR 180 DAYS FROM REVIEW AND ONLY FOR THE PLANS REVIEWED. ah (5 /i/ /-rr''l S - z 1 .- 93 Reviewed by: Review Date: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA OF: May 27 , 1993 ATTN: Stephen Clifton Senior Planner FROM: Federal Way Water and Sewer SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 2 - Paragon Office & Research Facility -- Site Plan Review COMMENTS: Water: The addition of water facilities for hydrants or fire protection will require a developer extension agreement with the District. Sewer: Sewer service may be possible by side sewer connection only, provided maximum length of side sewer is less than 200 feet and minimum slope of 2% can be maintained. An Industrial User Survey ( IUS ) will be required to be com- pleted prior to connecting to the District system. Pretreatment requirements , if any, will be determined upon evaluation of the IUS. ' 3 By: Date: �- 27 i E-DEVELOPMENT LNFORAL )N FEDERAL WAY BUILDING SECTI 661-4118 1 ?4iZ/4G e /1I �/'� - �T�x/i✓i�/c ttC=� P OJECT NAME OCCUPANCY TYPE CONSTRUCTION . Submit with completed application for permit, seven complete sets of plans of 24"x36" maximum dimension (include architectural, structural, electrical,drainage, utilities,and landscaping). Provide three each 8'/i"x11" and three full size site plans for addressing multiple building sites. At submittal provide two sets of structural calculations prepared by a professional engineer, registered in the State of Washington. . At submittal provide two copies of soil investigations and reports, as specified in Chapter 29 of the Uniform Building Code. 4. At submittal provide two sets of energy code calculations, including lighting budget. Washington State Energy Code (1991). — 5. Provide two copies of King County Health Department approved drawings. At the time of submittal, those regulations which are currently in effect shall be applicable to all project plans and specifications. The City of Federal Way has currently adopted all Uniform Codes, 1991 editions. _ �7. Washington State Barrier Free Standards apply. /viZ-S/=2 ' r' 8. Special inspection by an approved testing laboratory is required for site welding, high-strength bolting, piling operations,sprayed-on fireproofing, structural masonry, and cast-in-place concrete. Include testing Iab form and personnel credentials with building permit submittal for Building Section approval prior to construction. j/ 9. Separate permits are required for demolition, signs, rack storage, rockeries, etc., refer to Washington State Department of L & I for electrical permits. Plumbing and mechanical should be included on the main application for permits, described in #1 above. 10. Revisions to submitted drawings will be subject to additional plan review fees, if on larger sheets than 81 "x11". 2 `11. Minimum estimated fireflow (gpm) -`,j 5 t ' 6�,/77 , 12. Provide TWO FULL SIZE SITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE FEDERAL WAY POSTMASTER, showing approved locations, when installing gang-type mail boxes. 1,713. No building or portion of a building shall be occupied or used for storage prior to the issuance of the CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 14. No work shall start prior to the issuance of the permit. 15. Other: PREPARED BY DATE PRE DEN'.Doi CITY OF FEDERAL WAY TECHNICAL COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: May 12, 1993 TO: Community Development Review Committee (CDRC) Members Kathy McClung, Land Use Administrator Greg Moore, Development Services Coordinator Ron Garrow, Senior Engineer Joe Stevens, Parks Director Dick Mumma, Building Official Rick Gilmore, Supervisor of Technical Services, FW Water and Sewer Pat Kettenring, Assistant to the Fire Marshal, KC Fire District #39 Brent Beden, Operations Lieutenant, FW Police Department Max Osburn, Administrations Lieutenant, FW Police Department Linda Becker, FW School District #210 FROM: Stephen Clifton, Senior Planner PROJECT PLANNER: Stephen Clifton PHONE NO.: 661-4109 PLEASE RESPOND BY: May 27, 1993 - Pre-App with Applicant *********** :******************* :: **********: ************************** TYPE OF PERMIT REQUIRED: Site Plan Approval Sepa Review • Use Process III approval. FILE NO.: SEP93-0009 PRE93-0007 ai'p PROJECT NAME: Paragon Office and Research Facility PROJECT ADDRESS: 750 South 344th Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct an 88,130 square foot, two story office and research facility on a 5.8 acre site. The Site is zoned Office Park (OP). APPLICANT: PHONE NO.: Randy Hamblin The Quadrant Corporation P.O. Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 (206) 455-2900 • PROJECT BACKGROUND: I have polaroid pictures of the site if anyone wishes to look at them. In addition, a copy of the Level I One Downstream Analysis and Traffic Impact Analysis prepared as part of the application is being forwarded to the Department of Public Works. SEPA: Required. yy.y.y y.yy �y.4yy.y J.yy.yy yyy yy yy.yyy y.y�y.yy yy.y.yy y.iyi y.yy y.yyy yy.yyyyyyy.y y.y y.y *****************************************************************1**** COMMENTS: Ad; 5/6—N/T-3LAA6.T / /9A CT t'�ii>av ********************************************************************** (Please Attach Any Additional Comments) SIGNED: D • 6.9 s//./4 sc VIII / UPR93007.drc r T t ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of Checklist for Non-project Proposals: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions (part D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. r 2 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. 2. Name of applicant: The Quadrant Corporation 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: P.O. Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 Randy Hamblin 646-8319 4. Date checklist prepared: March 1993 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction start anticipated mid 1994. Construction completion/occupancy anticipated early 1995. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A. Phase I Environmental Audit, Geotech Consultants, Inc. , March 1993 B. Geotechnical Engineering Study, Geotech Consultants,Inc. , March 1993 C. Level 1 - Downstream Analysis, ESM, Inc. , May 1993 D.Traffic 'Impact Analysis, The Transpo Group, May 1993 I l 3 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval Building utility permits Tenant Improvements Penult (if no part of the Building Permit) Avetarat 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project is an 88,130 SF, two story, office and research facility on a 5.8 acre site. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Lots 28, 29, 30, 31 bounded by South 333rd Street on the northwest, 8th Avenue South on the northeast, and South 334th Street on the southeast. See legal description and map attached. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH 4 a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,, olling hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Slopes to the south/southwest b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 27% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)7 If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Loose top soil overlaying medium-dense filty sands overlaying native glacial till soils. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any fillin or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 4 �v • J.��1 V 0c0 el 4vt ���� Approximately U cubic yards of on site cu -ft fill. �� �""'— 27 el‘Alki 1 CI°t1 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor isolated run-off erosion could occur during construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 63% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Temporary sedimentation and erosion control fencing will be used to reduce erosion during construction. 5 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust may result from construction activities. Emissions from construction equipment and vehicles. Passenger and non-passenger vehicle emissions may increase after the site is developed. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Watering will be performed as necessary to reduce dust during construction. Avoid unnecessary idling of construction equipment. 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Lake Number 3 - Regional Storm Water Pond 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 6 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describ,e the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Only storm water run-off through the existing storm water system. b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water). 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Please refer to Level-1 Downstream Analysis by ESM, Inc. , March 1993 submitted together with this checklist. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Petroleum residue or silts could enter the storm drainage system. 7 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Oil/water separaters will be used to reduce the quantity of pollutants entering the storm drainage system. A grass lined swale will provide a filtering of pollutants entering storm water system. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. k deciduous tree: alder, maple, , other evergreen tree: fir, cedar,„ping, other '( shrubs , grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plant: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some deciduous and evergreen trees along with some tall and low shrubs will be removed or altered during construction. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Many existing trees will remain. The site landscaping will be designed to maximize and be compatible with the natural materials found on the site and surrounding development. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. • 8 birds: hawk, heron, eagle son bird other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Many existing trees will remain and many new trees will be added to the site together with shrubs, bushes and landscape material. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas will be used for heat, light and other energy needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The building will be designed and constructed to meet energy code requirements. 9 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The building and occupancy will be required to meet all local, state and federal requirements regarding hazardous materials. No hazardous uses are currently anticipated. The building will be fully sprinklered to reduce the risk of fire hazards. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire and Aid services may be required but no special needs are anticipated. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. None required. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment noise during day light hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Mufflers on construction equipment as required by codes. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE 10 a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant, undeveloped. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. No , d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? OP-Office Park f. What is the current comprehensive plan d ignation of the site? 1 c r TA/ ¶ zy A r g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 175 people initially 275 people after five years 11 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. code The project will meet all.requirements to ensure compatibility with other uses in the area. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Maximum height is approximately 33 feet, not including mechanical equipment screens which are not dimensioned until mechanical equipment is designed and selected. Principal exterior materials are glass and painted concrete. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None 12 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Many existing trees will remain.(he site landscaping will be designed to maximize and be compatible with the natural materials found on the site and surrounding developments. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None other than night lighting in the parking lot. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. N/A 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? U r-IJvw►v b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. N/A 13 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See the answer to question 12 on page 3 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? rnbximuJ'eb 1 61 e.. +0 5. 333'J` i wisy c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? � Oa/���.� -•.,.�l ' (n(171P P imin'7tOCl} .e--At.,(1\a/t4 - - Ulf �? � � / lGs 5u34)01 54 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvemmeedts to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No 14 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 1,140 vehicular trips per Traffic Impact Analysis, The Transpo Group, May 1993. Peak volumes will occur at the peak hour of street traffic at 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Potential cost sharing in off-site mitigation projects. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Limited fire protection, police, emergency services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The project will be fully sprinklered and will meet life safety and fire codes. 16. UTILITIES a. e`u ' 'ti av ' sit : electricit atural g water efuse servic telephone anitary sewer, s tic system other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sanitary sewer-Federal Way Water and Sewer, water-Federal Way Water and Sewer, telephone - GTE, natural gas - Washington Natural Gas 15 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. SIGNATURE: g7--)G G; fl DATE SUBMITTED: S 7 3 • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the proposal, of the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage or release of toxic of hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy of natural resources? Proposed measures to protect of conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce of respond to such demands are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. t ji • • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 28, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 27, LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 27; THENCE SOUTH 53°58' 39" WEST 23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE SOUTH 36°51'48" EAST TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE LYING 19.2 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; LOT 29, 30 AND LOT AND LOT 31 TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 32, LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 32; THENCE NORTH 51°30' 00" EAST, 214.26 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36°51'48" WEST TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32, 19 .2 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY FROM THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 32 AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE, ALL IN WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIVISION 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 97 OF PLATS, PAGES 55 THROUGH 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • • r 4 N Ilk • c• W E SITE MAP lifilti. 0 011 3 / /i . ' o�V y� i/ • �'•\•� .1 \ 13 ♦' '• cs)a , �, y� -1 18 . •�:.\ 492 t t- v e • L•• r•r•�• # '. S w� . .1• M t•• • • ."a `s \\I• "' 29 19 i. r• \ �' s • --. — 313.O.a - • S% ♦� y,\-. ..\.% .� S,c• 28 �,ts�o • ' `'�: LOT toe - ` '• f. • r'�•`• �O• ..i,+ Ir �% 0 30 R 5' • i •\ 27 •. SO° •P'Sli .1.6C 416 a NJ. 1 • 3,. i • ♦OP 31 4ei de.. �7' ���' �S r ir03 f 11 of ♦� V` • I• • r 4. t 1 26 •� 0 [ f�••• to. • A 32 •�• : . ;: ,'•4 10 \,•• �/�, • di (05 . le ,:.4 -;...,„ oesj, s... z'z 3in • . o .c.� ••, t • CITYtOF RY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICATION NO. Ur A 3- k c 7 Date , S• 7 • 1.5 cio 4 93..Ocaoc Agent Name of Applicant The Quadrant Corporation Owner X -`- :Address P.O. By c 130. Bellevue,. WA 98009 Phone: 455 Signature � h1✓ Property Location S. 3 rd on the NE, 8th Ave. S. on. the. NW, S. 334th on the SE Kroll Zone OP Office Park • -Legal Description, See Attached Project Description T e; pro e (5 ah 3&,ISO s=f:) twas4Tote . gin a YGseavtla -CGtG 1 i oln A S 6 G.GY'C . rEt Marcel Number(s): 28, 211p1 30,- 31 (See map attached) sue,: Type of Permit Required: SEPA " Notice Sign Checklist Mailed Board Site Plan Review R R * Land Surface Modification R R Boundary Line Adjustment - Binding Site Plan R R` R Short Subdivision * * : Subdivision R - Shoreline *R Variance : , , R R R Conditional Use R R R Use - Process I R * R. . Use Process II' R: R R X Use Process III R R R Quasi-Judicial Rezone R R R :.Variance : R Comp. Plan/Rezone R R Annexation R R = Required * = Optional by City MASIERLA.FR1►Z 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH • FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 • (206) 661-4000 Recycled Paper r et LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 28, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 27, LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 27; THENCE SOUTH 53°58' 39" WEST 23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE SOUTH 36°51'48" EAST TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE LYING 19 .2 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; LOT 29, 30 AND LOT AND LOT 31 TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 32, LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 32; THENCE NORTH 51°30' 00" EAST, 214 .26 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36°51'48" WEST TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32, 19.2 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY FROM THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 32 AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE, ALL IN WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIVISION 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 97 OF PLATS, PAGES 55 THROUGH 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • K• • N 111 .., .■•.•, e. W E SITE MAP it.r. S 7r ei. r\ \ \ • • . / 4 .% ...\ \\ 13 •' 18 ` `'\ .- 0 • A r , • ,.. \ 4\s ,•y .!r 29 • s`• •, 19 "+ 0 • \ 0. 313.0.E • *:\ A r 1� ++ 0.1 � • • , 0' .4.. i 59 Lc-. . olio \ \\6 1• f SOT t00 • , ` 0 30 -.6...*:.‘• it \10\ '0, / ♦r s + * e�� ft. e�,, 4se. 3 � a " 31 4 gyp`. •" '� . S .,. ; el 26 . • 32 L a 4.4 •' "+ S; .13 p • : x M -1 O�`�/n�• . e t�[� n i Nom IP iiiii IOW elm ri4 Z "..• G�� , i e /\... . ... \• \ i / \s a ' e 1\ �, ; 13 1 /� . • O • ' y • •+ •,• '\: 0. � `.. + e• La o t• *\ • t c...., • . d't‘\\ (.111 ,.•,•''' 0 ,,,,, 4101' -.„ , . .,„ 19 4*il 29 qr .. s- % \ —' 313.03 . • J 0 •f •7'• 47' 0 o.0 • y r•� '• g�• 28 ,.s;pc- . 0;• •. \• . . LOT 200 . 6yf•5$ �• . .. %\ i \\.\ • L c• 1. \.... i • ., , 31 �ec. o;., tt • • ' + �' o s'� per`' r 8 0 €0/ • s 26 •-t. 0.101 ' lk w S. 32 � �� ` Si.,. 10 /.1,t. : ...• ....., . €01 4.. .a • f� I• ,r `• `r + . 4 0 )6 sp ♦ ;• O\1. ••f . v OB3 6>. h 4',s 4 33 'o�,-•/> • OPT g • CITY OF FEDERAL WAY • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. CITY HALL REG/RCPT : 02-21208 C:05-07-1993 CASHIER ID : K 11:44 am A:05-07-1993 8017 USE PERMITS(PRO 82,205.00 USE PERMIT r..' :SS III 8022 SEPA CHECKLIST $367.00 TOTAL DUE $2,572.00 RECEIVED FROM: QUADRANT CORP. CHECK $2,572.00 TOTAL -::;r,ERED $2,572.00 CHANGE DUE "0.00 FIRS MERICAN TITLE (206) 728-' Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926470-0120 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : FEDERAL WAY WATER & Mailing Address: PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Phone Number . Site Address : 510 S 333RD ST CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 622-UTILITIES-PUBLIC Zoning : MP Square Feet 420 Land Size : 40, 000 Total Rooms . Units Bedrooms • . Yr Built/Remodl: 1979 Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $43, 300 1993 Tax $74 .21 Land Value $40, 000 Tax Exemption: EXEMPT Imp Value $3,300 Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement 7. 6% City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : Type Loan .• Sale Price Lender .• Type Deed Lender Name : Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # ' Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # . LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS BUSINESS &OFFICE Vol/Page: 096/050 Legal : L 12 LOT 12 TGW POR SW 1/4 OF SEC 17-21-4-BEGMOST NLY COR OF LO T 12 WEST CAMPUS BUSINESS & OFFICE PARK TH N 37-01-16 W 43 . 29 FT TH S 52-58-44 W 200 FT TH S 37-01-16 E 43 .29 FT TO NW COR SD LOT 12 TH N 52-58-44 E TO POB Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIRS ,MERICAN TITLE (206) 728- 6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0060 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : WEYERHAEUSER CO Mailing Address: TAX DEPT TACOMA WA 98477 Phone Number . Site Address : 33405 8TH AV S CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 264-OFFC-I-3STY 50K+ Zoning : MP Square Feet : 176252 Land Size 8. 17 Total Rooms . Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: 1979 Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $14,400, 000 1993 Tax $208, 025.80 Land Value $1, 602, 000 Tax Exemption: Imp Value : $12,798, 000 Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement 88.8% City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 89/09/05 Type Loan .• Sale Price : $15,873, 262 Lender .• Type Deed WARRANTY Lender Name . Multi Parcel Y Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 1083679 ` Loan Amount 2 : • Auditor Fee # : 890908-0468 PARCELS INCLUDED WITH LAST SALE Parcel Number UseCode Total Value %Land %Imp. Total Ac. 926500-0040 931 $189,900 100. 0 0. 0 0.969 926500-0050 932 $221, 200 100.0 0. 0 1.270 926500-0060 264 $11, 622, 600 12. 3 87.7 8. 173 3 $12, 033,700 10.412 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : L 6 THRU 10 & LOT 6 THRU 10 & LOTS 6 THRU 10 OF WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIV 1 TGW LOT 11 OF WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIV 2 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIRS MERICAN TITLE (206) 728-' 6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0120 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY Mailing Address: TN 928 TACOMA WA 98477 Phone Number . Site Address : 33330 8TH AV S CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 264-OFFC-1-3STY 50K+ Zoning MP Square Feet 71745 Land Size 4. 38 Total Rooms . Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: 1984 Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $6,885, 000 1993 Tax $99, 875.58 Land Value $860, 400 Tax Exemption: Imp Value $6,024, 600 Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement 87. 5% City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 90/06/18 Type Loan .• Sale Price $7,400, 000 Lender .• Type Deed WARRANTY Lender Name Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 1143323 ` Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : 900628-0891 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : L 12-13-14 LOT 12-13-14 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIRS MERICAN TITLE (206) 728- 6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0110 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : BONHAM INVESTMENTS CO INC Mailing Address: 280 N CENTRAL AVE RM 430 HARTSDALE N Y 10530 Phone Number : Site Address : 33400 S 8TH AV S CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 264-OFFC-1-3STY 50K+ Zoning : MP Square Feet 68586 Land Size 3 . 11 Total Rooms : Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: 1981 Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $4, 100, 000 1993 Tax $59, 918.53 Land Value $610, 300 Tax Exemption: Imp Value $3,489,700 Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement 85. 1% City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 91/12/02 Type Loan : MTG Sale Price $4, 100,000 Lender : 1WL Type Deed WARRANTY Lender Name : WELLS FARGO BANK Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: $2,400, 000 Excise Tax # 1221492 ' Loan Amount 2: Auditor Fee # : 911212-1002 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : L 11 LOT 11 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIRS MERICAN TITLE (206) 728- 6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0160 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : MERKIN ANTON H+STEFAN Mailing Address: 3260 LAKEWOOD AVE S SEATTLE WA 98144 Phone Number . Site Address : 822 S 333RD ST CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 504-WAREHOUSE 25K-50K Zoning MP Square Feet 25136 Land Size 1.86 Total Rooms . Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: 1987 Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $1, 650, 000 1993 Tax $24 , 634.21 Land Value $366, 300 Tax Exemption: Imp Value $1,283,700 Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement 77.8% City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 90/02/28 Type Loan : SEL Sale Price $1,750, 000 Lender : 9 Type Deed WARRANTY Lender Name : LENDER=SELLER Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 1120200 ` Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : 900307-0513 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : L POR 16 LOT POR 16 LOT 16 LESS POR LY ELY OF A LN DAF - BAAP S 52- 58-44 W 70 FT FR NE COR SD LOT 16 & TPOB OF SD LN TH S 37- 01-16 E 82.7 FT TH S 11-12-20 E 254 .85 FT & TERMINUS OF SD LN - AKA LOT B KC-LLA 8703002 APPROVED 5-4-87 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIRS ,MERICAN TITLE (206) 728- 6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0175 Q-S-T-R -17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : OLYMPIC OFFICE CENTER LP Mailing Address: 1116 15TH AV E SEATTLE WA 98112 Phone Number . Site Address : 710 S 333RD ST CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 931-VAC-IND 0-1AC Zoning : MP Square Feet : Land Size Total Rooms : Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : 1993 Tax .• Land Value Tax Exemption: Imp Value Tax Area Code: %Improvement City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 92/04/24 Type Loan : MTG Sale Price $1,400, 000 Lender : 3WC Type Deed DEED Lender Name : WEYERHAEUSER MTG CO Multi Parcel Y Loan Amount 1: $1, 120, 000 Excise Tax # 1245139 ' Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : 920505-0822 PARCELS INCLUDED WITH LAST SALE Parcel Number UseCode Total Value %Land %Imp. Total Ac. 926500-0170 263 $1,296, 600 13 . 6 86.3 1. 017 926500-0175 931 $143,900 100.0 0.0 0.826 2 $1,440, 500 1.843 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIV 1 LOT 2 OF KCSP #884049 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIR AMERICAN TITLE (206) 728- 6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0180 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : QUADRANT CORP Mailing Address: PO BOX 130 BELLEVUE WA 98009 Phone Number . Site Address : 700 S 333RD ST CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 932-VAC-IND lAC-5AC Zoning : MP Square Feet . Land Size 1.28 Total Rooms : Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $252 ,700 1993 Tax • $3, 531. 07 Land Value $252,700 Tax Exemption: Imp Value Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 93/01/25 Type Loan .• Sale Price FORCL Lender .• Type Deed WARRANTY Lender Name . Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 1292356 ` Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : 930203-2129 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : L 18 LOT 18 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIR, ,MERICAN TITLE (206) 728- 6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0190 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : QUADRANT CORP Mailing Address: PO BOX 130 BELLEVUE WA 98009 Phone Number : Site Address : 600 S 333RD ST CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 932-VAC-IND lAC-5AC Zoning : MP Square Feet . Land Size 1.28 Total Rooms . Units Bedrooms Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $250,800 1993 Tax $3,504 .52 Land Value $250, 800 Tax Exemption: Imp Value Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : Type Loan • Sale Price Lehder • Type Deed Lender Name . Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # ` Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : L 19 LOT 19 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIR AMERICAN TITLE (206) 728-_ __6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0195 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : QUADRANT CORP Mailing Address: PO BOX 130 BELLEVUE WA 98009 Phone Number . Site Address : 500 S 333RD ST CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 931-VAC-IND 0-1AC Zoning : MP Square Feet . Land Size 8, 143 Total Rooms . Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $36, 600 1993 Tax $511.42 Land Value $36, 600 Tax Exemption: Imp Value Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : Type Loan .• Sale Price Lender • . Type Deed Lender Name : Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: • Excise Tax # ` Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # . LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : L 20 LOT 20 LOT 20B KC SHORT PLAT 1077021 REC AF #7801060552 SD PLAT DAF LOT 20 WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIV 1 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIR AMERICAN TITLE (206) 728- 6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0200 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : AGENCY BUILDING INC Mailing Address: 31919 1ST AVE S #100 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 Phone Number : Site Address : 402 S 333RD ST CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 262-OFFC-1-3STY 5K-15K Zoning : MP Square Feet 14048 Land Size 1.25 Total Rooms : Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: 1979 Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $900, 000 1993 Tax : $13, 646. 06 Land Value $246, 600 Tax Exemption: Imp Value $653,400 Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement 72. 6% City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 88/09/01 Type Loan .• Sale Price $750, 000 Lender : 1WM Type Deed WARRANTY Lender Name : WASHINGTON MUTUAL SA Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: $637,500 Excise Tax # 1019969 ` Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : 880901-1212 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : L 20 LOT 20 LOT 20A KC SHORT PLAT 1077021 REC AF #7801060552 SD PLAT DAF LOT 20 WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIV 1 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIR AMERICAN TITLE (206) 728- 6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0260 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : DOW JONES & COMPANY INC Mailing Address: PO BOX 300 PRINCETON NJ 8543 Phone Number : Site Address : 600 S 334TH ST CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 610-PRINT-PUBLISHNG/PLNT Zoning : MP Square Feet 34220 Land Size 5.43 Total Rooms . Units • Bedrooms • Yr Built/Remodl: 1978 Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $3,000, 000 1993 Tax $43, 682 . 92 Land Value $1, 064,900 Tax Exemption: Imp Value $1,935, 100 Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement 64. 5% City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 82/12/21 Type Loan • Sale Price • Lender .• Type Deed • WARRANTY Lender Name . Multi Parcel Y Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 0699840 ' Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : PARCELS INCLUDED WITH LAST SALE Parcel Number UseCode Total Value %Land %Imp. Total Ac. 926500-0250 616 $1, 516,200 0. 0 0. 0 0. 000 926500-0260 271 $3, 025,600 0. 0 0.0 0. 000 926500-0355 904 $46, 000 0.0 0.0 0. 000 3 $4,587,800 0. 000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : L POR LOT POR POR LOTS 26-27-32 TGW LOT 33 DAF - LOT 26 LESS POR LY SWLY OF FOLG DESC LN - BEG MOST SLY COR SD LOT26 TH N 0 4-05-49 E 35. 68 FT TH N 38-06-47 W 243 . 27 FT TO NWLY LNSD LOT 26 & TERMINUS OF SD LN TGW LOT 27 LESS POR NELY OF FOL G DESCLN - BEG S 53-58-39 W 23 FT FR MOST NLY COR SD LOT 2 7 & TPOB OF SD LN TH S 36-51-48 E TAP ON SELY LN 19.2 FT S WLY OF ELY COR SD LOT27 & TERMINUS OF SD LN TGW LOT 32 LES Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data FIRS ,MERICAN TITLE (206) 728- 6 Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 03/19/93 Prepared for:QUADRANT, RANDY HAMBLIN Parcel Number : 926500-0330 Q-S-T-R : SW-17-21-04 Owner/Taxpayer : BILLINGS BARBARA L Mailing. Address: PO BOX 5208 REDONDO WA 98054 Phone Number . Site Address : 33405 6TH AV S CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 931-VAC-IND 0-1AC Zoning : MP Square Feet . Land Size 1. 00 Total Rooms . Units Bedrooms . Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $196, 000 1993 Tax $2, 738.78 Land Value $196, 000 Tax Exemption: Imp Value Tax Area Code: 1205 %Improvement City : FEDERAL WAY SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 89/08/11 Type Loan .• Sale Price QTCLM Lender • Type Deed QUIT CLM Lender Name . Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: . Excise Tax # 1078416 ` Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : 890814-0582 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK 1 Vol/Page: 097/055 Legal : L 33 LOT 33 LOT 33 B K C SHORT PLAT 876016 REC AF # 7608310627 Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1993 TRW REDI Property Data 4 ' CITY OF (206)661-4000 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210 FINDINGS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Application No. UPR93-0016 December 10, 1993 Paragon Office and Research Facility The following are findings for recommending Site Plan approval of an 88,130 square foot, two story office and research facility for Paragon Trade Brands, Inc., located at 750 South 334th Street in the City of Federal Way. FINDINGS 1. The site is currently zoned OP, Office Park. 2. The site is designated as Industrial/Office Park by the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed use is permitted in the OP district subject to Use Process III and Site Plan approval. 4. The site is currently undeveloped. The property is located in an urbanized neighborhood. Urban utilities and services are nearby to service the site. Current uses of the site and surrounding area include the following: Site: Undeveloped North: Office South: Office East: Office West: Office 5. Access is proposed at four locations. One along South 333rd Street, two along 334th Street, and one along 8th Avenue South. The proposed site plan was reviewed to ensure optimal location and configuration of access to the subject property. 6. The site contains slopes ranging from less than 2 percent to 27 percent. 7. The site is moderately to heavily wooded with a second and third-growth mixture of coniferous and broad-leafed trees native to the Pacific Northwest. The dominant tree is the Douglas Fir. Second-story vegetation and groundcover consists of Northwest native species including salal, sword fern, berry vines, and grasses. Findings ... Paragon Office & Research Facility December 10, 1993 Page 2 8. No environmentally sensitive areas have been identified on-site. 9. A mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued for this proposed action on November 16, 1993. The comment and appeal period for this determination was completed on December 15, 1993. 10. Preliminary earthwork calculations include approximately 18,000 cubic yards of cut and 20,000 cubic yards of fill. Thus, a net gain of 2,000 cubic yards of fill will be brought on-site. 11. A traffic impact analysis and supplemental information provided by the consultant for the Paragon Trade Brands Facility, has been used to identify impacts to the street system in the general vicinity of the project. The total number of vehicle trips per day will be 1,140. It has been determined that pro-rata share contributions shall be imposed to mitigate impacts at four locations (see SEPA conditions). 12. Runoff from the site shall be controlled by the use of on-site detention per the King County Surface Design Manual (KCSWDM) and recommendation BW-2 of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan, unless additional regional detention is developed in Lake No. 1 as currently proposed by the Quadrant Corporation. 13. Water and sewer facilities are available to the site and adequate to serve the proposed development. 14. The proposal embodies good design principals that will be compatible with the developing character of this area of the community. 15. The site and landscape plans, as depicted, will meet design requirements related to facade modulation and landscaping. However, pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1441(a), wherever feasible, building(s) should be located between the street and the parking area. The plan does not meet this guideline. A letter from George Sherwin, Vice President of the Quadrant Corporation, addresses Section 22-1441(a). The Director of Community Development has determined that the design criteria and site characteristics demonstrate that it is neither feasible or practical to meet the separation requirement. Upon review of the site plan and the applicant's rationale as to why the building should not be located between the street and parking, the Director of Community Development has determined that the request be granted. Findings ... Paragon Office & Research Facility December 10, 1993 Page 3 16. The proposed site plan, application, and application attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, pertinent zoning regulations, and all other applicable city regulations. As designed, the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will be required to comply with all applicable codes and regulations. 17. Development of the site in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and all applicable development codes and regulations will ensure that the interest of the public's health, safety, and welfare is protected. 18. The proposed development is consistent with decisional criteria required under Section 22-490(d) of the FWCC. Prepared by: Stephen Clifton, MCP, Senior Planner Date: December 10, 1993 i\aragm\aprroa. m IS 0 w w scuE r - sa CONTOUR lRSiVAL - 7 6.M'n - FAS, Tu ci n Sw. ZEMFA uwM1E MC ixRME SWIXI bin Sr. .wo all ws corn an M . .wo K x1,19 Pw PPvxIEn pEVnTGX J1516 x<AS D,Nu ME 9ENcx . rCV 4L, Ca K2 IrvRIrI POG,m K' FASJ c( ENIPA4cE ,O wµE SJREE, muRxK oN ME xoRm vDE a v]Ym JJw SME, RN. _ v]Ia LEGEND: ou XAIEII vKK 7 nRE rMVMrt y®y� SWIMn SfM4P Y.NN]1£ ']No2 SJUu DWx uua4E NOTE: II .E . wD uaru ]aE TA] A PORTION OF SECTION 17, TWP. 21 N., R@E 4 E, W K _ ��iq LUP Alum �E1B� SOUTH 333FiL7 ST. .1. HEPm YNMTF ®mNVIIKKC y. NxL CVW MD CIVNN6]PK lxlU „'ga331.w ]b..0 Jb.zO Un.I] n U9.W --v ]M � BOMm 0.'1xFi1 Sa']r E 311.80' \ Jb N�uSR�]r a ��- ��imNO�xa],m-b• �f rn«w I' ca 4YI -ball-zt.,/ �r c Ys EAS, v> Be x ..m v].Be {3ylyy^��� r cEDN bI.:I .}jlr��cw wain mwl .Uyx1K ]b.x]. Y{yyz r WDW ]Y,i.n U�.» yy_ • I xr M hi, M 3'(y xr Milli If j 11 M IT M IT It M ,ax]yy.�� Jy'yy� r M J]D M M I f 2)rf . if . r M I aayyzz�� ]r a IT FIM ,ry. IT M M 1! M 'Y r1^k•R£r M Ir a Ir M oil- LCJ -r zr3 ��w}�., I � {yy�� - IT M ! M IT M ID.o )a.b N SwF Y�/]j •U1K if 3^SN. _.19CF Ir M s J!M ,V y IP MMA]t (. $,U M ��x� _ y Ira.rrk����y If •M'2 J• yo IT M r I verso. •ve.w .]nss I / ify�x� x M d F f' M a if MaN^. 4• yy� Ir f Ix MYM ,IP°x .t Fykar K]atlx 'A'4- b x ]'-�,o a IT M aK.l9 it M r Ir M IT M If It r 3yF r t Iz w9•rooI rmx. dF Ir nu wwcRM'wNfv' ,Ir s Ir wx I IO if e D. Ir M x 11'-0'Jr f SM.eV > >v.4J IT ve.ee sxa.s ze( f M t r M . JzaW "'Iran M £ Ir if PR 8 °M Y•,!M PO vszJ i°XR >m iiy I� IYI e'klaM / IZ Cv )zB.BI y y 4 I xEYICCXI 4 •I./f •J�J yJ/_ ]x)SB (TIT r M r M ]Y M Ir M �roE 1171 zr 1/ IV 6 r INYLOCR .' k I! M IT M ]363] Al O]zags. w . vl a9 Jn.w. r M IT M \\ LO-r 32 sx 3 IT M {yy r •* .J]I IB IT r M r rk rM �Y tlV IfUb Ir R NI ] r n L'^ffx M IU M is TxY M ze.=4 U-r 3-1^^YYCC it �P Ir M n. r r Iz womr<I J r I IT M (•al�P��,�IT I M O M Y M Ir Ir n Ae.» JYy�r M P I° rrnFIR ry/Rf R V RR •INIm 40.KP Ir J vDN •'"` j5' ,V nR Ir nR�l-y •R.)] ,Y M Ip x la Wm } Iuswz Yx -� / B ce. RY Y P ii w rM N].)x IT ,J .73 I --JAW Y i-0-r 2-7 H IT Y k �! M ISkI Ex,wom � vi9e \\ Jxx.» nJ.m v. v ]35) vx.v Ica w-v.b Y _ wn>I• ]x w If iYP ScyM )M JJ iz �P OT 11 a r cw >'45 x '.! :YP PEA JxBB� s,CRu 91Wx WHxpE ca XN - »]s5 RI - ].659 K' NP GSr J.1.91 "I'll 27-1 � IT :V fASr Ia' CUP xplix »3 IY CUP $cNx U9.19 ��' (w wRxm sEnER) to .13 Yea to ya" Jx.>a 50 'r CxE$rl»310 Jy U a �S1DP HILX IY E.9 YP F/Sr N$.3z be ` IT cV IY.RM N3.1e L 39O. s°C4° Y / Jy . ]+PE u c.6It RY »a.19 \`'I�ELc]l.R 11 1 B, �RcwM IY M n�ES SW 9 - $ ITCv USi UH B] Ir cYP xaRM lio.sJ Y' JN.N JK n IT M r IT Yx rM MM It YMN Y »]m F R yy W TE IT 'IIt Not ]M e• )XI _ r NR li6]8 Ir M W PR'* JK.10 �y tr M 3-Yle' M M 14 t I! .30 JK.0 V IT BM x# aK.a N STN'W E 3]e-0J' t SIDRu pWx uwxIXE Ir M b- xORM t SCNN IME NPMGMN) DCx.xMl U9 J9 ° ,R IY ° j4(S,f �i. »101 No Y.wIEo sEYivi r I nP ]K.0 11 FIE ^�IKc Y m 5i• I• nR S,� r uxoRasr � - JK.a, f-j, i° M IY IIRIwI S' 'Mt It rIR L `l ¢y W / w ss IT .� l M U-r .30 a IY a 3f nR } T 1IA S � • � M M � Y'M1 iF f nR m R if FIR CB. 41Y - Jb.T IrM ,Q cuer Ewers >»ie IT n My � IT b IT d I DY° -P Ewsr''•OJ:z ]I �r cYP 1w »z aI cY CW 3'JI )UI I M 0 y�'IXf I I ..IRxIP; IY cuP if IT »355 '• W IXD $1 I �HXPII I o »n.Is \ I° a If wp2K IT M j x um':x- —zd nv0 S,PEE, .5. ♦ 1,n.99 3.tl.fa »I W b317 �YWIIEP/ `)] YNEruxw u� IrR/ ].n JI S UTH °•YP »3= xE YWNS cB. PoY - J.a=. 34TH It c4P En >.I.=B SW.x) »fW • NVIV YNM(A Ir On cuN. axxaw.r Ir P YE.AT IN. aw 50 HIW4 OxAa 4µrgE NIIERCW42WP" KIS IT CSxE3r Sb W 15 »S.q •»]IY [4P OPIu SM Jr °YPP wsr lJe J+ IIIM- J»n JKSI 'r c JK JS A PORTION OF SECTION 17 & 20, TWP. " NL, ROE. 4 E., W.M. AL76iNTE 7 : BTOFM E REWIRED FW THE CITY ➢F % W ON -SITE OE1FH11oN SYSTEY "DNSTRUCIED. TRW SM TALiERId NDWN WWw INC TYUI aUN0 DETF.f1TIDN MD iEQUIRE NIN➢R 110aF1GTNDN T< :ETCH B,EgNS MD STDRN %%h aCALB r - 30' CONTOLR WERVAL - 2 DATLtt KCA.& C B.. lOOETIEit WIM bd portion d td 27. Y, neN...t.V a a Ibs EMtnpotl m tabors: B NW d iNs mdt norDlwly m d Lot 27; THENCE S 5JW'39' W. n.W f b IN. TRUE MW OF BEGNNN'1D a said Nm: }HENCE S W51'46 E. to a poiM on BW epubwotary Nns b^^9 19.2 fort -ooBl...twy a Ih- w.bNy cwn.f a .oa tot N!D 1M brrrNwn of sab line; NAD T➢DDNER WI1N Lob n, W a 31; oL50 TOGEMER wmI tlwt po a I 32, Y, wb.a.twh a t fwl , a--oaea Nnw waNNINC a Br nwt . ff wy cony d ww ld 32: THENCE N 51'WOS E. 214.26 fs.t b IN; TRUE POIM a KaNNm TNFNKE N SW51'40r W. fo i pad on 11,II m Imn obfy Ane a ok lat 3z 1p.2 ha .wM-sobrry fYorrr tlw moa mrtflwy cawn a .aE La >2 MID BIs torrninw d wk Nne; ILL in "WOR CwnWs W! park D Ion 1'. acc W, b fM PW aww,f fecoN.d in Valan. 97 a Pleb. paps. 55 ON h 5B. R« nds a *W Cony. WaWrlgten. Siknle in 1 C ny a King, Sbb a WaWtI pion CATCH BASH WOFWATION OOCA II-.. TA 02'yTGW f O A TWYw T LE _ =2% iZ IE _ . .w IL - 322.16. IT O CA p TYPE I 0 CA /3. TYPE t(t _ 112.20 TA - ]2 .w I.E SR..W IL - =70 10 �,MM O TC.CB. IX ".IZ LE _ M..Ip. IT O CB. #11. T I T.G JleAO IE _ yTC.tC O CB. /5 1VpE II-.Ce TA - J]S.Ip I.E _ M" ® C.B. #It I I TA =M I.F. _ 332.DO OB TG It M.W ® CA na 1 I T.C. Sm.n E _ SlB3C O C.B. /T TYPE - J3 IZ 33 I.E _ ,.W,5p IBI Is. To A-CSf'I�Li. � 3. �a� II yt isfs . NCNONTUM R aS4THNDT REWIRED PER W6f s 5621• ue7 beS1ER NNeOE PlN1.5 IXISIINC SIR SLOPE ISt-nW Y01 Ci Sr1E 36W-.0{ ICi Ci SITE 15 �s•rr ����—�as�vrr��rr���rr�o� MEN, 1111mommimm��i�ei�i®®i�i®®�i�®� ■ s gi� z O E-F 0 z x d z d A R z a w � w a w as W z O A d O E U w E. z z d O � a a w �cr 6 a cr w IF Q1 � n a n a n a 0 a a a m a ; z O -lie 3•- E0 ° w 01 0 C� •. _ O W�haat r w p_4 0 0 e S e 0 c 0 cc e c c • • 0 0 0 ® O o 0 0 0 L 1.5 I I 10 g G �G H G. G z 0 F U' z x TT ,, F V V1 A a E � w r� A z W o ° A ¢ � o O L><. F rr 1►�� A f6 V �c m ° A M Q� N N In SECOND FLOOR PLAN O N Dtm i a O 0' 5' 25' SD' IDO' 3 w Z g o a_o � a w s o M Z sheet 0 U A-3 N no• -o- r ]D'-0' IS'-o' IF -Or ]D'-D"30'-0" IS'-D' IS'-D' I �-� -�-_ I 9' EIEC. 0 0 v 0 _ N 3]yy a hd O C 9 O C O Q O e GAF�6HE. I�S'-R0' _ bN bbbRrRSRbbbRIi _ A NEW FACILITY FOR PARAGON TRADE BRANDS INC. RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMJENT SEP 2 7 1993 a a m d m a) a) 0 u �0 ' EO I^ 9 W � > CW a .he.t 0 a A-0