Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
09-100736 (2)
1116, CITY OF CITY HALL FILE 33325 Federal Way Maihn 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 (253)835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.corn April 2,2009 Todd Wolf BCRA 2106 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300 Tacoma,WA 98402 Re: File#09-100736-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY Bethel Baptist Church,35905 16`h Avenue South,Federal Way Dear Mr.Wolf: Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development Review Committee(DRC)held March 19, 2009. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting was helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted. This letter summarizes comments given to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC. The members who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff from the City's Planning and Building Divisions,Public Works Department, and representatives from Lakehaven Utility District and South King Fire and Rescue. Some sections of the Federal Way City Code(FWCC)and relevant information handouts are enclosed with this letter.Please be advised, this letter does not represent all applicable codes. In preparing your formal application,please refer to the complete FWCC and other relevant codes for all additional requirements that may apply to your project. The key contact for your project is Matthew Herrera,253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. For specific technical questions about your project,please contact the appropriate DRC representative as listed below. Otherwise, any general questions about the preapplication and permitting process can be referred to your key contact. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Applicant proposes 39,050 square-foot church facility that includes sanctuary, multi-purpose room,and support areas on existing Bethel Baptist Church site. MAJOR ISSUES Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and information submitted for preapplication review. These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in the plans.These major issues only represent comments that the DRC consider most significant to your project and do not include the majority of the comments provided.The major issues section is only provided as a means to highlight critical requirements or issues. Please be sure to read the entire department comments made in the next section of this letter. Mr.Wolf Page 2 April 2,2009 • Planning Division 1. Proposal will require a land use Process IV"Hearing Examiner's Decision"and environmental review. 2. Subject site is considered"Historic Property"due to structures over 50 years of age on the site. 3. Facades shall face the right-of-way(16`h Avenue South). As proposed,the façade faces west and is not clearly recognizable from the right-of-way. 4. The City will adopt a new tree retention/replacement policy in the coming weeks. • Public Works Development Services Division This project is currently subject to the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM). However,the City's NPDES permit currently requires that new stormwater regulations be adopted by August 16, 2009. If a complete building permit application is submitted or a land use application is approved before August 16, 2009,the project will become vested to the requirements of the 1998 KCSWDM. If this is not possible,the project should be designed to meet the requirements of the 2009 KCSWDM and Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM.The 2009 KCSWDM is available at www.kingcounty.gov. A handout explaining vesting of stormwater requirements is enclosed. • Public Works Traffic Division 1. A Concurrency permit is required in order to assess project impacts and determine traffic and safety mitigation measures. 2. Street frontage improvements and right-of-way dedication are required along South 359th Street and 16th Avenue South. 3. The current proposal needs to meet access management standards. • South King Fire and Rescue 1. The required fire flow for this project is 2625 gallons per minute. 2. This project will require three new onsite fire hydrants. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the preapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions,please contact the representative listed for that section. PLANNING DIVISION (Matthew Herrera,253-835-2638,matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com) 1. Land Use Designation—The subject property is within a Single-Family Medium-Density Residential (RS15.0)zone.FWCC Section 22-635 allows church uses within RS15.0 zones. 2. Land Use Application—The proposed church improvements will require a Process IV "Hearing Examiner's Decision" and environmental checklist.The Planning Division will notify the applicant of application status within 28 days of submittal.If the application is determined complete, staff will issue a Letter of Complete Application. Process IV land use decisions are rendered by the City's Hearing Examiner following a public hearing.The Federal Way City Code(FWCC)allows the Hearing Examiner 120 days subsequent to the issuance of a letter of complete application to issue a written decision on the land use application. The 120-day review period will stop whenever staff 09-100736 Doc ID.49229 Mr.Wolf Page 3 April 2,2009 requests corrections or additional information from the applicant.The review period will begin within 14 days following submittal of requested items.Please be advised that any request for corrections and/or additional information must be provided within 180 days of written notification or the land use application shall expire. 3. Project Phasing—Please provide thorough detail of any phased construction of the proposed improvements, as this would be a component of Process IV review.FWCC 22-39 allows the typical 5-year approval duration to be extended"[i]f the development activity,use of land,or other actions approved under this article includes phased construction,the time limits of this section may be extended in the decision on the application,to allow for completion of subsequent phases." 4. Environmental Review—The proposed development requires environmental review pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). The environmental review is a component of the Process IV land use application and a completed environmental checklist with additional notice materials will be required.A thoroughly completed checklist that gives comprehensive answers to each item will expedite the review process. An environmental threshold determination made by the Director of Community Development must be rendered prior to public hearing. 5. Public Notification—Process IV applications and SEPA determinations require three separate notices. Within 14 days of issuing the Letter of Complete Application,a Notice of Application will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, mailed to persons within 300 feet of the subject property, posted on the subject property,and placed at the City's three designated notice boards.Notice will be given in the same format as described above following the City's SEPA determination.Notice of the public hearing will be given at least 14 days prior to the public hearing. The applicant is required to submit three(3)sets of stamped mailing envelopes to persons receiving tax statements within 300 feet of the subject property.The City's GIS Division provides this service for a nominal fee or the applicant may provide their own mailing envelopes via King County Assessor records or title company.Please find the enclosed mailing labels bulletin for further information. 6. Historic and Cultural Preservation—According to King County Assessor records,two structures on the subject property were built in 1918. Shortly after the City's incorporation,the property was considered for landmark designation by the King County Landmarks Commission.As the commission lacked jurisdiction within the City,it instead issued a determination of eligibility for landmark designation.If demolition of the existing historic structures is proposed, staff recommends the applicant contact the Historical Society of Federal Way and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation for appropriate mitigation measures.The City does not currently have historic preservation development regulations, so any mitigation required by the City, if any,will be via SEPA authority. If the applicant chooses to move the historic buildings to an off-site location, a demolition permit, building permit,and right-of-way permit will be required. For information regarding demolition and building permits,please contact a Development Specialist at 253-835-2607. For right-of-way permits,please contact Engineering Technician Kathy Messinger at 253-835-2725. 7. Environmentally Sensitive Areas—The City's critical areas inventory has identified a possible Category II wetland located within 50 feet of the southeast corner of the property. Category II wetlands have a standard 100-foot buffer width.The applicant will be required to submit a wetland report,prepared by a qualified professional, that includes the information set forth in the enclosed 09-100736 Doc L D.49229 Mr.Wolf Page 4 April 2,2009 FWCC Section 22-1356(b)and (c). This report must be submitted prior to,or as a component of the Process IV application. If third party review is determined to be necessary,the applicant will be responsible for all costs associated with third party review of the wetland report. 8. Parking—Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-635,the number of required parking stalls is based on a Transportation Management Plan (TMP)that addresses parking demand.Further information regarding the quantity of parking stalls cannot be determined until review of a TMP.Please indicate how parking requirements will be satisfied.The proposed sanctuary building is currently planned to seat approximately 350 persons.The parking analysis must include an analysis of all proposed uses, floor areas, and activities on the site. Please find the enclosed TMP bulletin addressing report requirements. Standard size parking stalls are 8.5 feet by 18 feet,with a 25.5 foot-wide two-way drive aisle. Compact stall spaces are 8 feet by 15 feet. Up to 25 percent of parking stalls may be compact size.A parking lot dimensional chart is enclosed. 9. Landscaping—A landscape plan prepared by a Washington State licensed landscape architect shall be submitted with the formal application. Please follow general guidelines outlined in FWCC Se2tior 22-1564(a)through(z)and highlighted items in the enclosed code section for further guidance.The following regulations are specific to your proposal: a. Perimeter-A 10 ft.Type III' landscape screen will be required along all property lines except the property line adjacent to the parking area. Type III landscaping is intended to provide partial visual separation of uses from streets and main arterials and between compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of parking areas and building elevations. The parking area adjacent to the residential subdivision on the west side will require a 10 ft.Type I2 landscape screen. Type I landscaping is intended to provide a solid sight barrier. b. Parking Lot-Twenty-two square feet of interior lot landscaping,per parking space,must be provided in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1567(b)(l),"Parking Lot Landscaping."Type IV3 parking lot landscaping is required to be installed at the ends of all rows of parking and disbursed throughout the interior parking area and at least every 10 parking stalls(FWCC Section 22-1638(a)(7). The site plan must list the specific size of each landscape island proposed for interior parking lot landscaping in order to verify the required square footage is provided. Landscape islands must be a minimum width of six feet between stalls and at the ends of all rows. Lighting fixtures shall not displace any required interior parking lot landscaping. Type III landscaping is defined as a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees interspersed with large shrubs and groundcover. Tree,shrub,and groundcover spacing shall be appropriate for the species type,and the intent of providing partial separation from streets and abutting properties. Type 1 landscaping is defined as evergreen trees,large shrubs and groundcover,which will provide a 100 percent sight- obscuring screen within three years from the time of planting;or a combination of approximately 75 percent evergreen and 25 percent deciduous trees,with an allowable five percent variance,with large shrubs,and groundcover backed by a 100 percent sight-obscuring fence. 3 Type IV landscaping shall consist of trees planted with supporting shrubs and groundcover.Shrubs shall be pruned at 40 inches in height,and the lowest tree branches shall be pruned to keep an eight-foot clearance from the ground.One tree per landscape island up to 150 square feet shall be planted.One additional tree shall be planted for landscape islands up to 305 square feet. Tree,shrub,and groundcover spacing shall be appropriate for the species type,and the intent of this section. 09-100736 Doc 117 49229 Mr.Wolf Page 5 April 2,2009 10. Tree/Vegetation Retention—A tree/vegetation retention plan shall be submitted with the Process IV application.The plan must be prepared by a certified arborist or certified landscape architect and include applicable information provided in the enclosed New Zoning Code Article X X,, Clearing, Grading, and Tree and Vegetation Retention. The City is currently amending tree retention/replacement requirements.New standards require each development/redevelopment to maintain a tree unit density.The minimum tree density requirements for Single-Family Residential zones are 25 tree units per acre; therefore,the subject property's density requirement would be 69 tree units(25 tree units x 2.76 acres).A tree unit is a value assigned to existing trees retained on the property.The larger the tree,the greater value it is assigned (e.g. an existing tree measuring between 18 inches to 24 inches qualifies as 2.5 tree units).The intent of the new tree regulations is to retain as many trees on the subject property as possible and to provide additional trees for those sites with insufficient tree cover.For trees that cannot be retained due to new construction,replacement shall be provided.A tree unit is assigned to each replacement tree depending on its species(e.g. one large canopy species qualifies as 1.5 tree units). Retention and replacement of tree units on the subject property must meet the minimum density requirement(69 tree units).If the applicant is unable to provide the minimum required tree units per acre on site; off-site mitigation or a fee-in-lieu payment into the City's urban forestry account may be approved by the Director of Community Development. Please find the enclosed code sections detailing new tree requirements,retention/replacement values,and tree protection during construction. 11. Community Design Guidelines—Although the Hearing Examiner will make the ultimate decision regarding the Process IV application,the Director of Community Development Services will issue the design decision prior to the public hearing. The Community Design Guidelines decision will be issued 10 days following the environmental threshold comment period. FWCC Sections 22-1634, 22-1635, and 22-1636 contain guidelines applicable to all types of development. Additional guidelines specific to your project are contained in FWCC 22-1639 and FWCC 22-1638 subsections(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(5)through(7), and(a)(9)through(a)(11).Project applicant should consult the guidelines in their entirety when preparing the Process IV application. Project designers shall strive for overall design continuity by using similar elements throughout the project such as architectural style and features,materials,colors,and textures.The formal land use application must include a written narrative identifying how the project complies with all applicable guidelines,as detailed in the FWCC. Several general guidelines applicable to the proposed project are below. a. Building Facade Modulation and Screening Options—Building facades that are longer than 60 feet and visible from either a right-of-way or residential use or zone shall incorporate at least two of the four listed facade treatments: 1. Facade Modulation—A minimum depth of two feet,minimum width of six feet, and maximum width of 60 feet.Alternative methods to shape a building such as angled or curved facade elements, offset planes,wing walls, and terracing will be considered, provided that the intent of the section is met. 2. Landscape Screening—Eight-foot-wide Type II landscape screening along the base of the facade,except Type IV may be used in place of Type II for facades that are comprised of 50 percent or more window area, and around building entrances. 09-100736 Doc 1 D.49229 Mr.Wolf Page 6 April 2,2009 3. Canopy or Arcade—As a modulation option,canopies or arcades may be used only along facades that are visible from a right-of-way.Minimum length is 50 percent of the length of the facade using this option. 4. Pedestrian Plaza—Plaza square footage is equal to one percent of the gross floor area of the building,but it must be a minimum of 200 square feet.The plaza should be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. b. Significant Structural Modulation—As the east and west building façade exceeds 120 feet in length and is visible from a right-of-way and residential zone, a significant structural modulation (offset)is required to be incorporated into the building design.The minimum depth of the modulation shall be approximately equal to 10 percent of the total length of the subject facade (24 feet)4, and the minimum width shall be approximately twice the minimum depth(48 feet). The modulation shall be integral to the building structure from base to roofline. It appears on the submitted site plan that a significant structural modulation incorporated on the west elevation (visible from residential area)meets the intent of this design requirement,but the east elevation (visible from right-of-way)does not provide such an offset. Please incorporate a significant structural modulation on the east elevation,or consider the alternative methods of modulation below. c. Al:ernutive Methods of Modulation and Facade Treatments—Alternative methods of modulation and façade treatment will be considered by the Director of Community Development if the following four criteria are met: 1. At least two of the four building modulation and screening options are incorporated; 2. The location and dimensions of the modulations are proportionate to the height and length of the facade; 3. Façade design incorporated a majority of design elements listed in FWCC 22-1635(c)(2); and 4. Overall building design utilizes a combination of modulation, facade treatments,and roof elements that organize and vary bulk and scale, and add architectural interest and appeal at a pedestrian scale. d. Pedestrian Circulation—Pedestrian pathways from rights-of-way to primary entrances, from parking lots to primary entrances, and pedestrian areas, shall be accessible and should be clearly delineated.Walkways shall be provided between the interior of the project and the public sidewalk and must be a minimum of six feet wide.Pedestrian pathways and pedestrian areas should be delineated by separate paved routes using a variation in paved texture and color. Approved methods of delineation include: stone,brick or granite pavers; exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete.Paint striping on asphalt as a method of delineation is not encouraged. e. Pedestrian Areas—Pedestrian areas and amenities should be incorporated in the overall site design. Pedestrian areas include but are not limited to outdoor plazas,courtyards, and seating areas. Pedestrian amenities include but are not limited to outdoor benches,tables and other furniture, and landscaping. Pedestrian areas should be easily seen,accessible,and located to 4 As calculated from submitted elevation drawings. 09-I G07 tp Doc.I.D 49229 Mr.Wolf Page 7 April 2,2009 take advantage of surrounding features such as building entrances, open spaces, significant landscaping, unique topography or architecture, and solar exposure. f Parking Lots—Parking lots should be broken up into rows containing no more than 10 adjacent stalls, separated by planted areas.Vehicle turning movements shall be minimized. Parking aisles without loop access are discouraged.Parking and vehicle circulation areas shall be clearly delineated using directional signage. g. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)—One aspect of the City's Community Design Guidelines are the implementation of CPTED principles(Natural Surveillance,Access Control,and Ownership)for all new development projects.The enclosed CPTED checklist must be submitted with the formal land use application. h. Appurtenances—Outdoor furniture, fixtures, and streetscape elements, such as lighting, freestanding signs,trellises, arbors,raised planters,benches, and trash receptacles should be incorporated into the site design. i. Lighting—In addition to CPTED lighting standards,the following shall apply: lighting levels shall not spill onto adjacent properties; lighting shall be provided in all loading, storage, and circulation areas; lighting standards shall not reduce the amount of landscaping required for the project; and lighting fixtures should not exceed 20 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. 12. General Zoning Regulations—The following are general zoning code regulations for church uses in RS15.0 zones.Please see the enclosed FWCC 22-635 zoning chart for further guidance. a. Setbacks—30 feet front, side, and rear. b. Lot Coverage—75 percent. c. Height—30 ft. above average building elevation. i. Any portion of the principal structure may be increased from 30 ft. to 40 ft. if the additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and each required yard abutting the structure is increased one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 30 ft. ii. Maximum height of the sanctuary or principal worship area may be increased to 55 ft if each setback abutting the structure is increased one ft for each one ft.the structure exceeds 30 ft. above average building elevation. iii. Religious symbols may exceed the highest point of the underlying roof on which it is mounted by an additional 15 ft.; provided that the symbol is a minor architectural accent and only one such symbol is permitted on the principal structure. As shown on the submitted elevations,the building and steeple meet height regulations. As shown on the site plan the proposed building appears to meet 30 foot front, side,and rear setbacks.Please be advised the placement of the garbage enclosure does appear to encroach into the 30-foot setback near the western property line,the parking area near the north property line appears to encroach into the 15-foot parking setback, and any play equipment proposed in the playfield must be outside of the 30-foot setback near the southern property line. 00-I00736 Doc LD_49229 Mr. Wolf Page 8 April 2,2009 13. Garbage& Recycling Receptacles—The design of the enclosure area should be consistent with the architectural design of the primary structures on the site.The enclosure shall be screened from the abutting property by a 100 percent sight-obscuring fence or wall.As proposed,the minimum size for the garbage and recycling storage area shall be 78 square feet. 14. Time Limitations—The applicant must begin construction, or submit to the city a complete building permit application for the development activity within one year after the final decision on the matter, or the decision becomes void. The applicant must substantially complete construction for the development activity and complete the applicable conditions listed in the decision within five years after the final decision. Requests for time extensions may be granted by the Director of Community Development if criteria set forth in FWCC 22-40 can be met. 15. Land Use Application Fees—The following 2009 fees include administrative review of the land use application. Other fees including,but not limited to traffic concurrency,building permits,and engineering review fees are not included in this total. Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision -$3,941.50 SEPA Checklist 948.00 $4,889.50 PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION (Ann Dower, 253-835-2732, ann.dower@cityoffederalway_com) Note: This project is currently subject to the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(1998 KCSWDM) and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM. However, the City's current NPDES permit requires that new stormwater regulations be adopted by August 16, 2009. If a complete building permit application is submitted or a Land Use Decision is approved before August 16, 2009, the project will become vested to the requirements of the 1998 KCSWDM. If this is not possible, the project should be designed to meet the requirements of the 2009 KCSWDM and Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM. Comments are meant to address either situation. Where no distinction is made, the condition will apply irrespective of which manual is applied to this project. Land Use Issues—Stormwater 1. This project will be required to provide Full Drainage Review. At the time of land use site plan submittal, a preliminary Technical Information Report(TIR), addressing the relevance of the project to the eight core and five special requirements of the KCSWDM will be required. A Level 1 downstream analysis shall also be provided in the preliminary TIR. The City has I"= 100', five-foot contour planimetric maps that may be used for basin analysis. 2. If the 1998 KCSWDM is applied,the project will be required to meet the performance criteria for Level 1 flow control. If the 2009 KCSWDM is applied,the project must meet the performance criteria for Conservation Flow Control. 3. In addition to the KCSWDM, our initial review suggests that FWCC Section 22-337, "Nonconforming Water Quality Improvements" applies to this site. Specifically, the following items are applicable: 09-100736 Doc.1.D.49229 Mr.Wolf Page 9 April 2,2009 1.a.Redevelopment which involves the creation or addition of impervious surfaces having an area of 5,000 square feet or more; 1.b.Redevelopment which involves the construction or replacement of a building footprint or other structure having a surface area of 5,000 square feet or more, or which involves the expansion of a building footprint or other structure by 5,000 square feet of surface area or more; 1.d.Redevelopment which involves the collection and/or concentration of surface and/or stormwater runoff from a drainage area of 5,000 square feet or more; I.g.Redevelopment,other than normal maintenance or other than the tenant improvements,but including any increase in gross floor area,in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value(whichever is greater)of the structure or improvement being redeveloped.The applicant may provide an appraisal of the improvement.The appraisal must be from a source acceptable to the City. The Director may require the applicant to provide an appraisal from a second source acceptable to the City if the assessed valuation appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. If more than one appraisal is provided by the applicant or required by the City,the greater of the two amounts shall be used.For purposes of this determining value under this section,improvements required pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-334(nonconforming development), 22-336(street/sidewalk improvements),22-337 (nonconforming water quality improvements)and 22-1473 (street/sidewalk improvements)shall not be counted towards the 50 percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection. Therefore, water quality treatment will be required for the entire site, including new and existing pollution generating impervious surfaces. If the 1998 KCSWDM is used to design the project,treatment options must be selected from the Basic Water Quality Menu provided in the KCSWDM. If the 2009 KCSWDM is used, the project must meet the requirements of the Enhanced Basic water quality menu,unless it can be shown to meet the criteria for use of the Basic Water Quality menu. 4. If infiltration is proposed, soil logs prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer or septic designer must be provided to verify infiltration suitability. 5. Detention and water quality facilities must be above ground (i.e. open pond). Underground facilities are allowed only with approval from the City of Federal Way Stormwater Management Division. 6. Show the proposed location and dimensions of the detention and water quality facilities on the preliminary plans. 7. If more than one acre will be disturbed during construction, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit may be required.Information regarding this permit can be obtained from the Washington State Department of Ecology at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/pac/index.html,or by calling 360-407-6437. Right-of-Way Improvements 1. See the Traffic Division comments from Soma Chattopadhyay,Traffic Engineer, for traffic related items. 09-100736 Doc.LD 49229 Mr.Wolf Page 10 April 2,2009 2. Based on available records and the submitted materials, it appears that this proposal meets the 25 percent threshold criteria for requiring street frontage improvements as identified in FWCC Section 22-1473. The applicant/owner may submit an MAI appraisal for the subject property,or King County Assessor's records may be used. Development Services Division will evaluate this data to determine if the project actually meets the City's 25 percent threshold for requiring street frontage improvements. 3. If dedication of additional right-of-way is required to install street frontage improvements,the dedication shall be conveyed to the City through a statutory warranty deed.The dedicated area must have clear title prior to recording. 4. All stormwater treatment and detention requirements outlined above will be applied to new impervious area within the public right-of-way. 5. FWCC Section 16-47 requires that overhead utility lines be relocated underground if over 500 feet, or three spans are affected by a project. This condition will be applied to South 359th Street. Building(or EN)Permit Issues 1. Engineered plans are required for clearing, grading,road construction,and utility work. Plans must be reviewed and approved by the City. Engineering review fees are$820.50 for the first 12 hours of review, and $68 per hour for additional review time. A final TIR shall be prepared for the project and submitted with the engineering plans. Both the TIR and the plans will require the signature/seal of a professional engineer registered/licensed in the state of Washington. 2. The Federal Way Development Standards Manual(including standard detail drawings, standard notes, and engineering checklists) is available on the City's website at www.cityoffederalway.com to assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and TIR. 3. The applicant shall provide a geotechnical report that addresses design pavement thickness for the roadways. 4. Bonding is required for all improvements associated with the project.The bond amount shall be 120 percent of the estimated costs of the improvements. An administrative fee deposit will need to accompany the bond to cover any possible legal fees in the event the bond must be called. Upon completion of the installation of the improvements,and final approval of the Public Works Inspector, the bond will be reduced to 30 percent of the original amount and held for a two-year maintenance period. 5. The developer will be responsible for the maintenance of all storm drainage facilities (including the detention and water quality facilities)and street systems during the two-year maintenance period. During that time,the Public Works Inspector will make periodic visits to the site to ensure the developer's compliance with the maintenance requirements. Upon satisfactory completion of the two-year maintenance period, the remainder of the bond will be released. Maintenance for public roads and subdivision drainage facilities then become the responsibility of the City. Maintenance for private roads and drainage facilities,including short plats,remain the responsibility of the individual property owners. 09-100736 Doc 1 D.49229 Mr. Wolf Page 1 April 2,2009 6. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans, the vertical datum block shall include the phrase"DATUM:N.G.V.D.-29"or"DATUM: K.C.A.S.,"on all sheets where vertical elevations are called out. 7. Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24"x 36"or 22"x 34"paper.All final approved drawings shall be drafted/plotted on 24"x 36"or 22"x 34"mylar sheet with permanent black ink. Site plans shall be drawn at a scale of 1"=20',or larger. Architectural scales are not permitted on engineering plans. 8_ Provide cut and fill quantities on the clearing and grading plan. Erosion control measures,per Appendix D, 1998 KCSWDM,must be shown on the engineering plans. 9. The site plan shall show the location of any existing and proposed utilities in the areas affected by construction. PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION (Soma Chattopadhyay,253-835-2745, soma.chattopad hyay@cityoffederalway.com) Transportath n Impact Analysis 1. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation 8th Edition, land use code 560 (Church), the proposed project (39,050 sq ft)is expected to generate approximately 19 new weekday evening peak hour trips with the credit for existing 5065 sq ft church. The estimated fee for the Concurrency permit application is $1576.50.This fee is based on estimated new PM Peak Hour trips of the current proposal. In addition to that the applicant would be expected to contribute pro- rata shares towards Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)projects impacted by one evening peak hour trip. Mitigation improvements necessary beyond those identified in the TIP to meet the City's adopted level-of-service standard may be required by the applicant to meet concurrency requirements of the Growth Management Act(GMA). 2. The applicant's traffic engineer has option to submit a trip generation and distribution study to determine the number of trips generated by the proposed development.At a minimum, the trip generation study shall include three(3)studies for similar land use, and settings approved by the Traffic Division.The methodology for determining the trip generation shall be based upon the guidelines established in the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE) Trip Generation. Street Frontage Improvements 3. Per FWCC Section 22-1474,the applicant/owner would be expected to construct street improvements consistent with the planned roadway cross-sections as shown in Map III-6 of the FWCP and Capital Improvement Program(CIP)shown as Table III-19. Based on the materials submitted, staff conducted a limited analysis to determine the required street improvements in meeting the FWCC. Based on the analysis and FWCC,the applicant would be expected to construct improvements on the following streets to the City's planned roadway cross-sections: • South 359`h is planned as a Type "R"street,consisting of a 40-foot street with curb and gutter, four-foot planter strips with street trees, 6-foot sidewalks, and street lights in a 66-foot right-of- 09-100736 Doc.LD 49229 Mr.Wolf Page 12 April 2,2009 way(ROW).Assuming a symmetrical cross section, 3-foot ROW dedication and half street improvements are required and should be measured from the street centerline. • 16`h Avenue South is planned as a Type"R" street,consisting of a 40-foot street with curb and gutter,four-foot planter strips with street trees,6-foot sidewalks,and street lights in a 66-foot right-of-way(ROW).Five-foot ROW dedication is required and should be measured from far side edge of travel way. 4. Per FWCC Section 22-1477,the applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director to modify,defer,or waive the required street improvements. Information about right-of-way modification requests is available through the assigned planner. Such requests have a set review fee. Access and Traffic Circulation 5. Access management standards are based on roadway safety and capacity requirements. FWCC Section 22-1543 provides access standards for streets based on planned roadway cross-sections. Please note that access classifications are per Drawing 3-1A in the Public Works Development Standards. 6. South 359th Street and 16th Avenue South are Access Class"4",which permits full access as close as 150 feet to any other street intersection or driveway,whether on or off the subject property.Please show all neighboring driveways within 250 feet of the proposed driveway(s). 7. This property does not have the 660 feet minimum street frontage to allow a second access driveway onto 359th Avenue South.The second access can be obtained from 16th Avenue South. 8. FWCC Section 22-1543 indicates a procedure and allows the public works director to modify access requirements. Other Comments Please note that the maximum allowable grade for city streets/access driveways is 15 percent or as approved by the Fire Department. PUBLIC WORKS-SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING DIVISION (Rob Van Orsow,253-835-2770, robv@cityoffederalway.com) Solid Waste& Recycling Design Considerations Solid waste and recycling design considerations include: • Adequate space allocation for interior and exterior garbage,recycling,food waste,waste oil,yard debris,hazardous waste,or biohazard collection containers. Minimum recycling space allocation is established by FWCC 22-949. • For basic solid waste and recycling needs within a single enclosure,clear interior dimensions measuring 10' deep by 20' across are recommended, along with a two-door swing-open or roll-open gate that spans the front width of the enclosure.When gate doors are opened,no structure or hardware should remain above grade across the enclosure opening. Gate pins/holes are preferred for holding gates in closed and open positions to ease service access and maximize the Iife of gate hardware. 09-100736 Doc.1 D 49229 Mr.Wolf Page 13 April 2,2009 • Sites may require a larger enclosure, or multiple enclosures,to accommodate on-site user access and/or additional waste types and containers. • Plan for user access to interior waste and recycling storage areas/containers,and to exterior containers screened by enclosure(s). • Plan for unobstructed, safe enclosure ingress and egress for service vehicles, directly in line with enclosure openings.Allow appropriate turning radii for service vehicles, and minimize potential `blind spots' during ingress and egress. • Consider landscaping, setbacks and screening requirements [based on FWCC Section 22-1564(d)& (e)]. • Note that larger-scale commercial or multi-unit housing developments may see long-term savings from the use of on-site waste compaction equipment. Planning for this equipment may require larger enclosure dimensions,defined overhead clearances,consideration of power utility access,and drainage management. • Mixed-use developments may also benefit from on-site waste compaction equipment. Additional mixed-use development considerations include: o Designated chutes and/or internal facility maintenance areas or services for tenants, o Moving waste and recycling streams from interior units to collection areas, and o Access by business tenants and/or residents to exterior waste and recycling areas. Help with many design parameters related to service access is available via the City's contracted solid waste services provider,Waste Management. Contact: John Davis—Senior Route Manager at 206-786- 4530(cell). BUILDING DIVISION (Scott Sproul, 253-835-2633,scott.sproul@cityoffederalway.com) International Building Code(IBC), 2006 edition Washington State Amendments WAC 51-50* International Mechanical Code(IMC),2006 edition Washington State Amendments WAC 51-52* Uniform Plumbing Code(UPC), 2006 edition Washington State Amendments WAC 51-56& WAC 51-57* International Fire Code(IFC), 2006 Washington State Amendments* WAC 51 -54 National Electric Code(NEC),2005 edition Accessibility Code ICC/ANSI A 1 17.1-2003 International Residential Code 2006 Washington State Amendments* WAC 51-51 Washington State Energy Code 2007 WAC 51-1 1* Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code 2007 WAC 51-13* 09-100736 Doc 1 D 49229 Mr.Wolf Page 14 April 2,2009 *Current State Amendments are dated: July 1,2007 ** As of January 1, 2002,the State amendments now require arc-fault interrupters for 15-20 amp branch circuits serving sleeping rooms in dwelling units(R-1's). Building Criteria Occupancy Classification: A-3 and E Type of Construction: V-B proposed Floor Area: first floor 31550 second floor 7500 Number of Stories: two Fire Protection: 5,000 sq. ft. and greater require fire sprinkler systems per FWCC and Buildings 3,000 sq. ft. and greater require fire alarm system. Wind/Seismic: Basic wind speed 85 Mph, Exposure , 25# Snow load, Seismic Zone D-1 A complete building permit application and commercial checklist. (Additional copies of application and checklists may be obtained on our web site at:www.cityoffederalway.com.) Submit five sets of drawings and specifications. Specifications shall include: X Soils report X Structural calculations X Energy calculations X Ventilation calculations.Note:A Washington State Registered architects stamp is required for additions/alterations(new or existing)of 4,000 gross floor area or greater unless specifically listed as an"exempt" structure per the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). Submit two copies with King County Health Department approval stamp for all projects that include food service facilities, septic systems or other elements within the project that require health department approval. Energy code compliance worksheets are required to be completed and included with your permit application. A wet stamp and signature is required on all sheets of plans and on the cover page of any calculations submitted. Federal Way reviews plans on a first in first out basis;however,there are some small projects with inconsequential review requirements that may be reviewed out of order. Review Timing The first comment letter can be expected within seven to nine weeks of submittal date. Re-check of plans will occur in one to three weeks after re-submittal. Revised or resubmitted plans shall be provided in the same format, size,and amount as the originally submitted plans. Revised/resubmitted drawings shall indicate by means of clouding or written response, what changes have been made from the original drawings. Plans for all involved departments will be forwarded from Community Development Services. Federal Way has an expedited review process. Information is available at our front counter. 09-100736 Doc 1D.49229 Mr.Wolf Page 15 April 2,2009 Other Permits&Inspections Separate permits may be required for electrical,mechanical,plumbing, fire suppression systems, and signs. Applicants may apply for separate permits at any time prior to commencement of construction. When required, special inspections shall be performed by WABO approved agencies or by agencies approved by the building official prior to permit issuance. Construction must be approved by all reviewing departments prior to final building division inspection. All concerned departments(Planning,Public Works, Electrical, Fire)must sign off before the Building Department can final the structure for occupancy. Building final must be approved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.The City of Federal Way does not issue temporary Certificate of Occupancies. All construction projects may be required to have a pre-construction conference.If a pre-con meeting is required,all subs, the general or representative,the architect or representative, the engineer or representative,electrical contractor and any other interested party. should attend this meeting. Meetings will occur at the Building Department and will be scheduled by the inspector of record for the project. Site-Specific Requirements • Will this project be phased; such as just the shell constructed and T-l's and occupancy at later date? • Will there be an on-site day care and what ages? • What are the ages of the children that will be attending the school? • Demolition permit required for the removal of any structures. • Commercial kitchens require the installation of type one cook exhaust hoods. • The type of construction proposed is V-B. IBC table 503 only allows group A-3 occupancies to be single-story when type V-B construction is used. Please see IBC table 503 for allowable height and building areas. When submitting building plans include building height and area calculation to show code compliance per chapter 5 of the 2006 IBC. The information provided is based on limited plans and information. The comments provided are not intended to be a complete plan review and further comments are possible at time of building permit plan review. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT(Brian Asbury,253-946-5407, basbury@lakehaven.org) Water a. A Certificate of Water Availability(application form enclosed)will presumably be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement).Certificate is valid for one (1)year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed, allow 30 days to issue. b. A Developer Extension Agreement will be required to construct new (fire hydrants)and/or abandon existing mainline water distribution facilities for the proposed development.Additional detail and/or design requirements can be obtained from Lakehaven by completing& submitting a separate application to Lakehaven for either a Developer Pre-Design Meeting or a Developer Extension Agreement (application forms enclosed).Lakehaven continues to encourage owners/developers/applicants to apply for either of these processes separately to Lakehaven, early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. 09-100736 Doc 1 D 49229 Mr. Wolf Page 16 April 2,2009 c. Depending on the fmal approved design,new water main greater than 8-inch diameter may be required,and if so,this construction needs to be specifically identified in the SEPA checklist prepared and submitted for the proposed land use action. If main greater than 8-inch diameter is ultimately required and is not specifically addressed in the initial SEPA checklist and approval,a separate SEPA process may be required prior to authorizing construction of any new water facilities. d. Utility conflicts should be identified and coordination should occur as early as possible in the planning process.Project will need to avoid encroachment with new Lakehaven facilities and easement(s).New perimeter landscape requirements may conflict with new easement terms& conditions,and if so owner should coordinate any required revisions with the City and Lakehaven early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. e. A separate water service connection application submitted to Lakehaven is required for each new service connection to the water distribution system, or any modification to an existing water service connection (e.g.,larger service, irrigation,abandonment of existing service(s),etc.), in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current 'Fees and Charges Resolution'.Non-single-family properties require separate domestic,irrigation (if irrigated landscaped areas are incorporated into the site development), and fire protection(if required or installed)water service connections. Currently, the property has an existing 5/8"x3/4" domestic water meter. Based on the proposal it's presumed this meter will not be large enough for the proposed church use, and will either need to be abandoned or potentially re-used/converted to the irrigation meter for the site. f. Applicant will be required to complete and submit a Water Use Questionnaire(WUQ,copy enclosed). Information in the WUQ will be used by Lakehaven to determine specific premise isolation(aka backflow prevention)requirements. g. The associated Developer Extension Agreement must achieve a point of either Substantial Completion or Acceptance, as determined by Lakehaven prior to activating any new domestic or irrigation water service connection(s). Sewer a. A Certificate of Sewer Availability(application form enclosed)may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications(check with land use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one(1)year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed,allow 30 days to issue. b. A separate sewer service connection permit(application form attached)is required for each new connection to the sanitary sewer system, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current 'Fees and Charges Resolution'.Minimum slope for gravity sewer service connections is 2%. In addition to all other sewer service installation standards, installation of a Type 1,48"monitoring manhole is required on the private building sewer line, for all new or modified non-residential connections. c. Owner will be required to complete and submit a Sewer Use Survey(SUS,copy enclosed). Information in the SUS will be used by Lakehaven to determine specific pretreatment requirements. Restaurants&/or commercial food preparation facilities must install &utilize an externally-located, oil/water separator; size to be determined by owner's engineer. General a. Sewer charges-payable-in-lieu-of-extension(CPILOE)will be assessable against the property for facilities previously constructed that provide direct benefit to the property,as part of the sewer service connection permit process. A preliminary CPILOE amount of$47,076.86 is estimated (120,163 sq. ft. of property @$0.3918 per sq. ft.). 09-10073o Doc 1D 49229 Mr.Wolf Page 17 April 2,2009 b. For any proposed change or increase in usage beyond the level of the water and/or sewer system capacity previously purchased for the property(ies),Lakehaven researches prior system capacity charges paid,if any,and evaluates the subject property(ies)for the existence of any available credits and determination of a capacity 'base level' for the subject property(ies). For any new or modified, non-residential connections sought after December 31,2004, Lakehaven will assess additional Capital Facilities Charges(CFC)to property owners,where increased usage of the water and/or sewer systems beyond the property's'base level',including increases attributable to usage associated with existing service(s), is indicated based on owner's submittal of estimated water consumption figures. Additionally,Lakehaven will levy, and the owner shall pay,a capacity rental charge for capacity utilized,based on water consumption records, during a usage monitoring period (not to exceed five years)above the level of capacity available following payment of any additional CFC and/or new or modified service connections as noted herein.The owner has the option to make full purchase of any system capacity deficit at any time. c. Lakehaven's Capital Facilities Charges are calculated on the basis of Equivalent Residential Units (ERU).Residential equivalency for non-residential connections will be estimated based on anticipated water use(1 ERU=255 gallons per day for water and 220 gallons per day for sewer). Owner will be required to provide a reliable estimate of proposed water consumption (domestic and irrigation separately)for the property(information from a similar facility may be submitted in lieu of a new estimate).Lakehaven's current 2009 Capital Facilities Charges, subject to change without notice, are $3,000/ERU for water and$2,891/ERU for sewer. d. Credit is available for this property from connection charges previously assessed/paid/credited for water only for one(1)Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU).No ERU credits exist for sewer. All comments herein are valid for one(1)year and are based on the proposal(s)submitted and Lakehaven's current regulations and policies.Any change to either the development proposal(s)or Lakehaven's regulations and policies may affect the above comments accordingly SOUTH KING FIRE AND RESCUE (Chris Ingham,253-946-7244,chris.ingham@southkingfire.org) Flow&Hydrants The required fire flow for this project is 2625 gallons per minute.A Certificate of Water Availability shall be provided indicating the fire flow available at the site.A hydraulic fire flow model shall be requested from the water district. This project will require three new onsite fire hydrants.Fire hydrants shall be in service PRIOR to and during the time of construction. Fire Access Roads Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. EXCEPTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, these provisions may be modified by the chief. Fire apparatus access roads: • I) Shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. 09-100736 Doc.1D.49229 Mr.Wolf Page 18 April 2,2009 2) Shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of a 30-ton fire apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. 3) Shall be not less than a 32-foot inside turning radius and not less than a 40-foot outside turning radius. 4) With a dead-end in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with a cul-de-sac or Fire Department approved alternative at the dead end.All such cul-de-sacs shall be not less than 80 feet in diameter. 5) Gradient shall not exceed 12 percent. Designated fire lanes may be required for emergency access.This may be done during the plans check or after the facility is in operation. When required,approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction by parking and other obstructions. Fire apparatus access roads shall be installed and made serviceable PRIOR to and during the time of construction. Sprinklers An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all occupancies requiring 2,000 gpm or more fire flow or where the total floor area included within the surrounding exterior walls on all floor levels,including basements. exceeds 5,000 square feet.Fire walls shall not be considered to separate a building to enable deletion of the required automatic fire-extinguishing system. The system demand pressure(to the source)required in a hydraulically designed automatic fire sprinkler system shall be at least 10 per cent less than the correlative water supply curve pressure. Fire Alarm A complete Fire Alarm System is required.An automatic fire detection system shall be installed in all buildings exceeding 3,000 square feet gross floor area.This fire detection system shall be monitored by a central and/or remote station conforming to the current requirements of the National Fire Protection Association standards and/or the fire chief or designee. Fire Safety&Evacuation Plans An approved key box shall be installed in an approved location. South King Fire and Rescue utilizes the Knox Box system for access to buildings.Boxes can be ordered online at www.knoxbox.com or obtain an application form from the Fire Marshal's Office. Fire safety and evacuation plans shall be submitted and approved prior to occupancy. Fire evacuation plans shall include the following: 1. Emergency egress or escape routes and whether evacuation of the building is to be complete or, where approved,by selected floors or areas only. 2. Procedures for employees who must remain to operate critical equipment before evacuating. 3. Procedures for accounting for employees and occupants after evacuation has been completed. 4. Identification and assignment of personnel responsible for rescue or emergency medical aid. 5. The preferred and any alternative means of notifying occupants of a fire or emergency. 6. The preferred and any alternative means of reporting fires and other emergencies to the fire department or designated emergency response organization. 09-100736 Doc.I 49229 Mr.Wolf Page 19 April 2,2009 7. Identification and assignment of personnel who can be contacted for further information or explanation of duties under the plan. 8. A description of the emergency voice/alarm communication system alert tone and preprogrammed voice messages, where provided. Fire safety plans shall include the following: 1. The procedure for reporting a fire or other emergency. 2. The life safety strategy and procedures for notifying,relocating, or evacuating occupants. 3. Site plans indicating the following: 3.1. The occupancy assembly point. 3.2. The locations of fire hydrants. 3.3. The normal routes of fire department vehicle access. 4. Floor plans identifying the locations of the following: 4.1. Exits. 4.2. Primary evacuation routes. 4.3. Secondary evacuation routes. 4.4. Accessible egress routes. 4.5. Areas of refuge. 4.6. Manual fire alarm boxes. 4.7. Portable fire extinguishers. 4.8. Occupant-use hose stations. 4.9. Fire alarm annunciators and controls. 5. A list of major fire hazards associated with the normal use and occupancy of the premises, including maintenance and housekeeping procedures. 6. Identification and assignment of personnel responsible for maintenance of systems and equipment installed to prevent or control fires. 7. Identification and assignment of personnel responsible for maintenance,housekeeping and controlling fuel hazard sources. Fire safety and evacuation plans shall be reviewed or updated annually or as necessitated by changes in staff assignments,occupancy, or the physical arrangement of the building. CLOSING This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication meeting and is intended to assist you in preparing plans and materials for formal application. We hope you found the comments useful to your project. We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the City's review of the formal application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter does not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per FWCC Section 22-1657. As you know,this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication materials submitted. Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify information regarding development requirements outlined above.In addition to this preapplication letter, 09-100736 Doc I.49229 Mr.Wolf Page 20 April 2,2009 please examine the complete FWCC and other relevant codes carefully. Requirements that are found in the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project. If you have questions about an individual comment,please contact the appropriate department representative noted above.Any general questions can be directed towards the key project contact, Matthew Herrera,253-835-2638.We look forward to working with you. Sincer Matthew Herrera Associate Planner enc: /Bulletin 001 `Development Requirements' Bulletin 002`Mailing Labels' Bulletin 003 `Master Land Use Application' Bulletin 021 `CPTED Checklist' Bulletin 041 `Accessible Parking' Bulletin 042`Parking Lot Design Criteria' Bulletin 050`Environmental Checklist' Bulletin 212'Concurrency Information&Application' FWCC Section 22-635 'Churches' FWCC Chapter 22,Article XVII `Landscaping' FWCC Chapter 22,Article XIX `Community Design Guidelines' New FWCC Tree&Vegetation Regulations 2009 KCSWM FAQ Lakehaven GIS Map c: Eun Backstrom,2106 Pacific Avenue,Suite 300,Tacoma,WA 98402 Ann Dower,Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Soma Chattopadhyay,Traffic Engineer Scott Sproul,Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury,Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingharrt,South King Fire&Rescue op-10071C Doc I 49229 Pre-application Conference Sign in Sheet a, .,.�:,..,r � •.:..�ss.���M•�,�,wN�,�,.,,.» b-. .. .. ,' , .,,.,.�, .,,.. .,s..,y ��. �', �.�:aui�.,. "� =..fir.-,sit-..'. Project Name: Bethel Baptist Church Address: 35905 16th Avenue South, Federal Way,WA File Number: 09-100736-00-PC NAME DEPARTMENT/DIVISION TELEPHONE NUMBER 1. Ma-AA C2r-O._ L ,����, , fi , V .\/, ,�c nn��� ( Z53 " ("75"--Z672 2. SO-mLv C m?o f p W• 2 5 3 -8 3 5-2 S' 3. rM l } 'Y fb6 = lu 4.5 - 83S-1732_ 4. ico01' 4217,vt./ i 0,/21 5. 4R A 1E-RiAckM1/6-ou ariw nisi � —q -s o'7 6. C /S /i✓�/-(�/-4 sovi�f ?�‘ 72 ' 7. J d 4 ti ^1 �� ����r� ��- te j2 I 3 cP3 (3 // 8. GC>/ ?'Z/ %" �i�2%�I 9. Euf' 'a4titt647 A-77—BX/1--(- 10. 1312V, WOW- %PI l•*47 Pi-,M/o\1c Pfer 2.4'3 K35 2 4/3 12. Matt Herrera From: Sundberg, Charlie [Charlie.Sundberg@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:16 PM To: Matt Herrera Cc: Koler, Julie Subject: Harding School (HRI#0251) Mr. Herrera: Julie Koler asked me to respond to your request for information. Our files show that this property was inventoried in early 1978, well before incorporation of the city. In 1991, after incorporation, the property was considered for landmark designation by the King County Landmarks Commission. Because the Commission lacked jurisdiction within the City, it instead issued a determination of eligibility for landmark designation. Our records have not been updated since that time, so any alterations or extensive physical deterioration since 191 could render that judgment inappropriate today. I could fax a copy of the nomination and staff report if that would be helpful. If the building remains intact, it is a very rare surviving schoolhouse from the early 20tn century. Because the County has no jurisdiction within the City and has no contractual relationship with the owners of the property, there are no potential restrictions that I can imagine other than those that may be provided under the City's codes, and SEPA and other City development requirements. The historic significance of the property, if it remains relatively intact since 1991, is probably relevant to SEPA, since the Commission's determination is recognition of eligibility for a local historic register. If the City finds no way to preserve the building in situ or on another site, other mitigation measures should be considered, including high-resolution photographic documentation, a detailed site plan, a report summarizing additional detailed research on the building and people and/or events associated with it, oral histories from any surviving teachers and students who attended the school, and so forth. Let me know if you would like more information or if we can be of assistance in some other way. Charlie Sundberg Preservation Planner,Historic Preservation Program King County Office of Business Relations and Economic Development MS:YES-EX-510 400 Yesler St., Suite 510 Seattle,WA 98104 v:206.296.8673 fax: 206.705.0719 From: Matt Herrera [mailto:Matt.Herrera@cityoffederalway.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:39 PM To: Koler, Julie Subject: The Harding School in Federal Way Ms Koler, I am currently reviewing a pre-application development proposal for the property that currently contains the Harding School (AKA Unity Church & Bethel Baptist), 35905 16th Ave S., here in Federal Way. Deb Barker thought I should check with you regarding the historical landmark status of the two buildings on the property.She was able to find an old Historic Sites survey conducted for the property, but no further information. Does King County currently regard the two buildings as landmarks? Are there any county restrictions on developing the property? Any information would be helpful and I greatly appreciate your time. 1 ' 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCSDCC PAGE 01 r"Bk: L King County KING COUNTY BUSINESS RELATIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MS: YES-EX-0510 400 Yesler Way, Suite 510 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 205-0700 FAX (206) 205-0719 Fax To: itt AT f �l erk From; C,. Fax: ��� 0_Pages: 1 y te",/., Phone: �Gj i1' ,Zl/, Date: // Re; 1Ts 7/X 1 Tel: 766 • l 0 Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle " aim.. [7-Tr? Lei d�� / % I s) k b j i / M I &'t'T -- TWie. ( /W 7 4 F /1E 1luf' . 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCBDCC PAGE 02 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, PLANNING AND RESOURCES CULTURAL RESOURCES DIVISION, LANDMARKS COMMISSION 1115 Smith Tower, 506 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104 KING COUNTY LANDMARK REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing King County Landmark Forms. Complete each Item by marking "x"in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an Item does not apply to the property being documented, enter"N/A"for"not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the.Instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets. Type all entries. 1. Name 6T' ro.perty • historic name: Harding School other names/site number: unity Church of Christianity/ King County Historic Sites Surve No. 0251 2. Location street & number: 35905 16th Avenue South not for publication City, town: Federal Way Vicinity state: Washington. code: WA county; King code: 033 zip code; 98003 3. Classification Ownership of Property; Category of Property; Number of Resources within Property: x private x buildin s p y' public-local _ districtg� ) Contributing Noncontributing public-State object �-- Z building(s)public-Federal site object te structure str str ucture Total Name of related multiple property listing: Nuber of contributing resources p P P Y pred ously designated as King County Landmarks: . 0 4. Owner of Property name: Unity Church of Christianity street & number: 35905 16th Avenue South city,town: Federal Way Vicinity: state: WA zip: 98003 revised 12/5/89 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCBDCC PAGE 03 5. Function or Use Historic Functions (enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (enter from instructions) EDUCATION RELIGION School religious structure 6. Descrption Architectural Classification (enter from instructions) Materials (enter categories from instructions) foundation: concrete Colonial Revival walls: wood: lap roof: asphalt composition other: Describe present and historic physical appearance. The Harding School was constructed in 1920. The Colonial Revival building is in good condition and retains many of its original architectural elements and integrity of location and setting. The interior has been completely remodeled by the present owners and converted into a church hall and offices with a sanctuary in the basement. The building is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of 16th Avenue South and 359th Street in Federal way about one and one half miles north of the Pierce--King County border. In addition to the school house there are two other buildings on the 2.77 acre lot: a 25' x 29' frame and wood-sided building to the northwest of the schoolhouse and a 15' by 20' frame and wood-sided building to the west. The surrounding area is a mix of residential and agriculture with open hay fields to the south and residences across the street to the north and east and adjacent to the west and a large apartment complex to the northeast. An unpaved drive enters the property on the north near the northeast corner. It passes along the front of the school and leads to an gravel parking area on the south. The schoolhouse is a large T-shaped two-story wood-frame building capped with a low- pitched intersecting gable roof. The foundation is poured concrete and there is a full basement. The building is sheathed in horizontal shiplap siding with decorative, corner pilasters capped with modest capitals. Gable returns and a cornice further carry out the classical theme. The building is oriented to the east with the primary facade in the gable end. A secondary entry is located in the basement on the south elevation. There are small palladian windows in the south and north gables and a modified palladian window in the east gable with a segmented center arch. Large double-hung windows provide ample light to the interior and are executed in a variety of pane configurations: eight-over-one, six-over-six, and three-over-three. On the front wing are two pairs of double hung windows divided by mullions, located on either side of the entrance and still have a six-over-six pane configuration. The windows have a strip of decorative moulding under the sills. There are two sets of five six -paned ribboned basement windows near ground level on the we elevation. Other basement windows have been boarded over. Molded vinyl shutters have been added to sash windows. Front double doors and all other doors are solid plane and not original. A large carport has been added on the north elevation. It has a low pitched gable roof with decorative corner brackets that were either moved from or duplicated the brackets from the original front porch hood. The hood over the main entrance is not original. x See continuation sheet 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCEDCC PAGE 04 KING COUNTY LANDMARK CONTINUATION SHEET Section number 6 Page_ 1 Northwest of the school house is a small bungalow style building about 15' by 20 ' with front and back covered porches. This building was originally built as the teacher's cottage or teacherage. A steeple has been added to the east end over the main entrance. The are small porches at the main entrance on the east elevation and at the secondary entance on the west elevation. The present porch hoods and railings are not original. This building now houses the Sunday school classrooms for the church. To the west, behind the schoolhouse, is the old pump house. It is a small 12' x 18' frame building still retaining some of its simple design elements: horizontal siding, cornice trim, corner boards and Colonial Revival roof lines and returns. The original door and windows have been boarded up. There are no windows on the building now and a garage door has been added in the south elevation. The setting for Harding School retains a very rural feeling. The lot is open and meadowlike with scattered trees and some shrubs and flowering bushes near the buildings. A small vegetable garden has been planted next to the Sunday school house. ' 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCBDCC PAGE 05 7. Statement of Significance Significance of this property in relation to other properties: _national _ statewide x local Applicable Designation Criteria .Al _ A2 A3 — A4 _ A5 Criteria Considerations (Exceptions) C1 C2 C3 C4 05 Areas of Significance (enter categories from instructions) Period of Significance Significant Dates Education 1920 - early 1940s Architecture 1920 Cultural Affiliation NA Significant Person: NA Architect/Builder: NA aMMOININIIr State significance of property, and justify criteria, criteria considerations, and areas and periods of significance noted above. The Harding School is significant under criterion Al as a well-preserved historic resource representing the growth and development of education in rural King County and under A3 as a good example of Colonial Revival architecture. It is one of only four remianing country schools in the Federal Way Planning District and one of only two that are register eligible as a King County landmarks. Steele Lake Schoolhouse (inventory #0555) and Old Star Lake School (inventory #0008) have both been significantly altered and incorporated into other structures. Only Harding School and Star Lake School (inventory #0248) retain their ingerity and Harding School displays elements of a specific architectural style not found in any of the other school houses. Its modified style represents a relatively rare subtype of Colonial Revival architecture with a centered front gable. The date of construction is based on tax assessor records and newspaper accounts. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE The common school system of Washington and King County reflected a strong belief in providing a free education and was a product of territorial laws and state laws. In spite of rapid growth and improving transportation lines in the 1880s, rural areas remained independent and quite separate from the urban neighbors, The public school was an important part of rural life, establishing an identity and focus for the community. Early school district organization followed a common pattern. Interested settlers would call together the heads of families in the area, find a place to hold classes, elect directors, raise money by either taxing or collecting donations, employ a teacher and open a school. The group would then petition the county superintendent to form a district. The Territorial School Superintendent would appropriate school funds to several counties and turn the money over to each county superintendent. The county superintendent then turned over a quota of funds to the clerk of each district. The directors and clerk hired the teachers, paid them and other expenses, �_,See continuation sheet 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCBDCC PAGE 06 KING COUNTY LANDMARK CONTINUATION SHEET Section number 7 Page In 1860 there were only 35 teachers in all of Washington Territory and King County had no professional teachers. By 1872 King County had nine schoolhouses and twelve districts. The earliest report of a King County Superintendent begins in 1877 with S.S. Ingraham, By 1885 the county schools had grown to 43 districts with 80 teachers. School District #42, where Harding School would be located, was established Nov. 8, 1884. Also known as the Edgewood School district,it drew students from the rural areas of South King County around Auburn and from rural Tacoma and Puyallup. A small portion in the southeast corner of the district was removed to form another district on Sept. 12 1917. This parcel was consolidated with part of a Pierce County district to form Joint District #193 In 1918 there were 32 students. in School District #42. The original school for District #42 was located on Neal Road, about 1/2 mile east of where Harding School now stands. This first two-room school was known as the Adelaide School as children from the Adelaide Beach District #55 also attended classes there while that district built a new school. After statehood in 1889 there was significant improvement in rural schools. Early primitive structures were gradually replaced with frame buildings and later brick, fire resistant buildings. After the turn of the century the progressive policies of State Superintendent Josephine Preston greatly improved the quality of country schools in Washington. Preston was superintendent from 1913-1928 and the new schools built during her tenure were larger, multiclassroom buildings with ample windows,, indoor plumbing and modern features. Preston also included teacherages or teacher's cottages in her rural. school plans and hundreds were built during her administration. In 1918 District #42 purchased land from Puget Power and Light at the corner of Neal Road and the old Milton Road (now 359th Street and 16th Street South) . A new school was built in 1920 and in 1922 was named Harding School in honor of the late President Warren G. Harding. According to Ann Calavan, who taught at the school for almost its entire history, one of the most delightful features of the new school was a drinking fountain in the entrance foyer. At the old Adelaide School the children had to help Mrs. Calavan and her husband Wade, who was principal for .the school, carry five-gallon water bottles to the school that had no running water or amenities. The new Harding School was a modern, two-room frame building with a basement, library, kitchen facilities and restrooms. There were large sliding doors between the two class rooms that could be opened to make one big room. The eighth grade girls took turns cooking a hot lunch one day .a week under the supervision of Mrs. Calavan. The school also had a teacherage that later was the home for the school district's first bus driver. ConsohAdation • In the early 20th century and especially after World War I the move to consolidate rural school districts was a primary focus in education in King County and throughout the country. By combining the resources and students from several small districts, country schools could improve facilities and transportation, receive more state money and, in many cases, finally move to a graded curriculum. In 1905 the first consolidated school districts were organized in King County. Transportation of students was one of the motivating problems for the rural schools. By consolidating, several schools could pool funds and pay the costs of getting the children to the district schools. Sometimes districts would pay for feed for student's horses or give allowances for interurban fares. In near by Auburn the district used horse-drawn transportation wagons. Transportation on poor country roads was also a problem for District #42. Children walked several miles to school, rode bicycles, horses and buggies or were brought to school by Mrs. Calavan in her 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCBDCC PAGE 07 KING COUNTY LANDMARK CONTINUATION SHEET Section number 7 Page2 Model T Ford, Parents in School District #42 began to push for consolidation to finance buses and other facilities. On May 22, 1929 the school districts for Edgewood (#42) , Adelaide (#55) , Star Lake (#64) , Steel Lake (#92) and Redondo (#169) consolidated to form the Federal Way School District (SD) #210 and the Federal Way High School served students from all these areas. The high school was named for the old federal highway that abutted or crossed each of the districts and connected Seattle and Tacoma. It also became the name for the new district. SD #210 housed their first bus at Harding School. The bus drivers were Mr, and Mrs. Guy Pierce who lived in the teacherage on the school grounds. School continued to be taught by Mrs. Calavan at Harding School through the 1930s and early 40s. Helen Johnson and Wade Calavan also taught at the school at different times. During the early part of the century the, state legislature encouraged school districts to allow the community to use the school facilities. Schoolhouses across the state were made available to civic groups and social clubs for meetings and activities. It is interesting to note that many of these social clubs were instrumental in developing other educational opportunities for the community like libraries and study clubs. The Harding Improvement. Club met at the Harding school for many years. The club later became the Lakeland Community Club and in 1952 the club purchased the old school and grounds for $3, 000 for use as its club house. The club later became moved to larger facilities and became the Brooklake Community Club. The club sold the schoolhouse property to Clarence Barker in 1967 for $14, 000. Barker remodeled the main floor of the school into a private residence. In 1975 the Unity Church of Christianity purchased Harding School. During the past two years while the church extensively remodeled the interior of the all the buildings, it has maintained the architectural integrity of the exteriors. ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE The Harding School is a good example of Colonial Revival architecture and is an example of the centered gable subtype of the Colonial Revival style, In the case of Harding School the center gable actually intersects with the cross gable, During the first half of the the 20th century Colonial Revival was the dominant. style for domestic buildings throughout the country. (Harding School has a definate domestic appearance to its design and scale) While nationally the more popular style for educational buildings centered around Late Gothic Revival and brick and stone where used for building materials, small rural schools in King County and across Washington were. mostly simple frame buildings and only occasionally brick, as funds permitted and the century progressed. Colonial Revival has its origins in a renewed awareness in national heritage and interest in colonial architecture inspired by the Centennial in 1876. Architects studied original Georgian and Adam buildings throughout New England and renowned architects McKim, Mead, White and Bigelow took a widely publicized tour of New England in 1877. Their designs for landmark homes in Massachusettes and Rhode Island started a trend that would continue for the next 75 years. While early Colonial Revival examples where rather free interpretations of the earlier style, after the turn of the century there was a shift to more carefully researched copies and a marked advance in architectural scholarship. The epitome of this interest in historic accuracy is in the restoration of Williamsburg, Virginia, that was begun in 1927. The growing popularity of Colonial Revival was due in part to improved methods of distributing information. Better printing methods and photographic reproduction made "The American Architect and Building News", and later the "white Pine Series of Architectural Monographs" and other publications more readily available. Now the 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCBDCC PAGE 08 KING COUNTY LANDMARK CONTINUATION SHEET Section number 7 Page 3 details and proportions of the style were more widely understood and Colonial Revival construction between 1915 and 1935 more closely resembled early colonial buildings than did earlier designs of the revival period. The simple execution of the Colonial Revival style in Harding School reflects a popular style of the time and simple utilitarian form of a country school. The other county school in the Federal Way area that has retained architectural integrity is the Star Lake School at 272nd Street and Military Road. Both share the use of :Large windows, frame Construction, horizontal siding and small scale that are dominant in rural schools built at the time. But, only Harding School exhibits some stylish elements not usually incorporated into simple rural schoolhouses of the period, Palladian windows, decorative corner pilasters, window trim, corner brackets and the T shaped floor plan make Harding School an interesting variation to the straightforward, simple rectangular venacular design of most country schools. Only occasionally was simple form supplemented with ornamentation or stylistic elements. It wasn't until after 1930 that ambitious school designs were generally pursued. The Harding School is one of only four remaining country school houses in this part of King County. Harding School remains intact and unincorporated into other structures. (Steele Lake School and Old Star Lake School have been moved and changed into residences. ) Harding School remains an important representation of the history of rural education in King County. It reflects' the values and lifestyles of the people in its community, area policy on education and school construction as well as the architectural trends of the time. 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCBDCC PAGE 09 8. Major Bibliographical References Reed, Marie Stowe, Federal way Historical Society; personal notes, interviews and oral histories Garfield, Leonard and Griffith, Greg, Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, "Rural Public School in Washington from Early Settlement to 1945, " hat Tonal Regd_ste.r of Higroric plgres Mn1 ie Prn D _ sl lm�n t�se r i m F n rm prepared March 17, 1986 See continuation sheet Previous documentation on file: Primary location of additional data: x included in King County Historic Resource Inventory#0251 State historic preservation office previously designated a King County Landmark Other State agency previously designated a Community Landmark Federal agency previously listed in Washington State Register of T Local government Historic Places University preliminary determination of individual listing Other (26 CFR 67) has been requested Specify repository: previously listed in the National Register previously determined eligible by the National Register designated a National Historic Landmark recorded by Historic American Buildings, Survey# recorded by Historic American Engineering, Record# 9. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 2.77 acres Quadrangle Name:POVERTY BAY 7.5 MINUTE SERIES Quadrangle Scale: 1:24, 000 Verbal Boundary Description E 394 FT OF POR OF S 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF STR 29-21-04 LY SLY OF NEAL RD LESS CO RD POR TAXABLE See continuation sheet Boundary Justification The boundary includes the school house, teacherage and old pump house and the grounds that have historically been a part of Harding School. See continuation sheet 10. Form Prepared By name/title: Rebecca Day, Cultural Resources Specialist organization: King County Historic Preservation Office date: June 25, 1991 street & number: 1115 Smith Tower, 506 - 2nd Ave. telephone: 296-7580 city or town: Seattle state:WA zip code: 98104 - 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCBDCC PAGE 10 KING COUNTY LANDMARK CONTINUATION SHEET Section number 8 Page •1 Department of Education, State of Washington, "Consolidation of Rural Schools and Transportation of Pupils, " Bul]et3n No.7, Olympia, WA, August 1, 1911 "District.Votes Favor $10, 000 School House, " The Auburn Glob-Republir,,3n, August 6, 1920 "TAuburn' s School Problem One of Many in County, " The Auburn Globe-Republican. October 1, 1920 McAlester, Virginia & Lee, A Field„Quide to Ameri-an- 11ou• -s, Alfred A. Knopf, 1984, pp. 320-341 Wh.iffen,. Marcus and Koeper, Frederick, American Architecture 1607 1476., The MIT Press, 1981, pp 283-285 The National Commission of School District Reorganization, your Srhoal Dtat rirt, Department of Rural Education, 194.8, pp.69-79 & p.104 Rapeer, Louis W. , The Consolidated Rura1 'S_chool, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1920 Bagley, Clarence B. , History of King County Washington, Volume I , SW Clarke Publishing Co. , 1929, pp. 500-508 Ku • om Educational Service District 121, Puget Sound Regional Branch of the Washington State Archives King County DBillt Records fsom Educational Setvide Dint 121, Puget Sound Regional. Branch of the Washington State Archives King County Aaaaz-z-" a nf.aa,2 r_L1 D,,,,PA y - anent RecQ zd Puget. Sound Regional Branch of the Washington State Archives 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCSDCC PAGE 11 44) (fie STAFF REPORT September 19 , 1991 PROPERTY: Harding School At its August meeting the Landmarks Commission directed staff to request a formal opinion from the King County Prosecutor regarding the Commission ' s authority to designate landmarks in incorporated areas of the county . A copy of the. Prosecutor' s opinion is attached for the Commission ' s review. In summary it states that the Commission is not authorized to designate landmarks in incorporated areas ;, however , the opinion also states that there is no apparent "significant risk of legal liability being imposed upon King County or the King County Landmarks Commission as a result of the mere designation of a landmark within an incorporated area of the county , where such designation has no regulatory effect. " There are a number of issues related to designation in incorporated areas beyond that of regulatory controls . These include , but are not limited to , eligibility for King County grant monies , eligibility for informational plaques , and the perception, either positive or negative, that designation creates in the community . Because the Commission has not had an opportunity to discuss these issues and has not adopted policy guidelines for designations in incorporated areas , staff makes the following recommendation: proceed with making a "final determination" on the Harding School . This determination shall not be construed as a designation but rather a determination of whether or not the property meets the criteria for landmark designation . A similar determination is used by the National Park Service when it reviews Federal Agency development proposals for impacts on historic resources . This process is called a Determination of Eligibility and consists of an evaluation of the property' s significance using the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places . A positive determination does not mean the property is listed in the National Register; however, it is useful for planning purposes . Similarly, such a determination by the King County Landmarks Commission for properties in incorporated areas of the county could be useful in local planning efforts . • 03/12/2009 09: 38 2062634597 KCBDCC PAGE 12 RECOMMENDATIONS: 1 . Make a final determination that the Harding School meets criteria Al and A3 for designation as a King County Landmark; however , until policy guidelines are developed regarding this issue this action shall be construed as a determination of eligibility and not a formal designation . 2 . Refer the incorporated area designation issue to the Policy and Planning Committee for policy discussion and recommendation . Matt Herrera From: Brian Asbury[BAsbury@lakehaven.org] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 8:56 AM To: Ingham, Chris; Matt Herrera Subject: Bethel Baptist Church Attachments: 09-100736-00-PC.pdf Got,just this AM, some deadlines I gotta meet, so not going to make the mtg, so here's a map&quick comments. See you next week! DE Agr req'd for construction of required onsite hydrants. New water service connections for irrigation &fire protection, maybe upsize existing domestic service or convert to irrigation. Sewer service connection. «09-100736-00-PC.pdf» Brian Asbury Engineering Technician III Lakehaven Utility District http://wvvw.lakehaven.org/standards.htm FAX 253-529-4081 NOTE: Lakehaven Utility District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of any facility information shown. Facility locations and conditions are subject to field verification. All fees and charges subject to change without notice. 1 ` CITY OF CITY HALL Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South ,:•4 Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253)835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.corn March 9, 2009 Mr. Eun Backstrom BCRA 2106 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98402 Re: File#09-100736-00-PC,NOTICE OF PREAPPLICATION MEETING Bethel Baptist Church,35905 16`h Avenue South,Federal Way Dear Mr. Backstrom: I have been assigned as project planner for the above-referenced proposal. At this time,the application has been routed to members of the Development Review Committee. A meeting with the project applicant and committee has been scheduled as follows: 9:00 a.m.—Thursday,March 19,2009 Hylebos Conference Room City Hall, 2nd Floor 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way,WA 98003 We look forward to meeting with you. This is the only notice sent out, so please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend the meeting. If you have any questions regarding the meeting,please contact me at matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2638. Sincere Matthew Herrera Associate Planner Doc.I.D.49290 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 3, 2009 TO: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer o Development Services o Traffic Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Matthew Herrera FOR DRC MTG. ON: March 12, 2009 - Internal March 19, 2009, 9:00am - with applicant FILE NUMBER(s): 09-100736-00-PC RELATED FILE NOS. : None PROJECT NAME: BETHEL BAPTIST CHURCH PROJECT ADDRESS: 35905 16TH AVE S ZONING DISTRICT: RS 15 .0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct new sanctuary & multi-purpose room w/kitchen. LAND USE PERMITS: Preapplication Conference PROJECT CONTACT: BCRA Eun Backstrom 2106 PACIFICAVE Suite300 Tacoma, WA 98402 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: o MLU o BCRA Transmittal o Pre-app Checklist o Project Summary o Site Plan o Elevations o Site Photos ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING A LAND USE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN Wgi �I GRAPHIC DESIGN Date: 02.4.09 X Transmittal To: Department of Community Development Services 33325 8th Ave. South Fax PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Pages including this cover sheet Attn: Building and Planning Project: #08757 Federal Way Bethel Baptist Phone 253-835-2607 Church We are sending you: X Attached Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 7 02-23-09 Pre-application conference drawings 1 02-23-09 Master Land Use Application 1 02-23-09 Pre-application Conference Checklist 7 Project Summary THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Reviewed as submitted Resubmit For review For your use Reviewed as noted x Submit for distribution As requested Returned with response Return Corrected prints For review / comment For Recording FOR BIDS DUE PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN FROM US Included is an application for Pre-application Conference for Federal Way Bethel Baptist Church. Please contact us when the Pre-application Conference is scheduled. Copy To: Federal Way Bethel Baptist Church BCRA If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Signed: Eun Backstrom 2106 PACIFIC AVE,SUITE 300 TACOMA,WASHINGTON 98402 P 253 627 4367 F 253 627 4395 M , Project Summary for Pre-application Conference Federal Way Bethel Baptist Church 35905 16th Ave. S. Federal Way,Washington 98003 0. Project Description Development of new church facilities that include sanctuary, multi-purpose room and support areas with consideration of utilizing the existing facilities. Subject Property Assessor's Information Parcel# #2921049034 Address 35905 16t"Ave. South Federal Way,WA 98003 Lot Area 120,163 sq. ft. (2.76 acres) Property Type C-COMMERCIAL N : Use Church/Welfare/Religious Services Note: Property is located in King County.The property is inside limit of City of Federal Way. of Zoning Designation: Single Family Residential (RS15.0) o Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single Family Medium Density 0 Project Summary Gross Area of Proposed Building 1st Floor 31,550 Sq. Ft. o• _, 2"a Floor 7,500 Sq. Ft. Total 39,050 Sq. Ft. Type of Construction V-B O Occupancy Type A-3 LIJ Total Parking , 111 Stalls (3.15 occ/stall) Z Q V V Q d - 0 RECEIVED FEB 2 6 2009 CITY OF FEDERAL.WAY CDS cii y m Q N O 0 8 E. PO , O = C/ [D /�� W CX 7 oN O s W .. W oiIIraOK Oa I R, g �1y y Y V 1 1 • — _ i'Iir I g .0e VVV. S $ — o $ SZ NI I illi 4 tit CIP Id A r r ___ V. !MAPS Q I *>_. I N . I ,r'_ w 1 i2. ii il 0 C- n = n + IN f 1 + NJtoo CI_ 7r V1 (1 0,1 jC V1 rp ID > > al W 0 �^ a .-r to . 1-1 p i.e. > > 1 i = f1 N A o m 0 N o o J2W co M o_ i4[ N O cn .04'.Cc' 325:82 (P.) 30 s£.,,�x 1.`� u. H„ ,- V '..i J ZO N n r w 9�� Fp` tJ w zo I Y 0� 1. 0 N..' " t'I n <271.90> IV 'S p V F Q w N o $% •SB3� �'O� t � W to £ --I J Ltc) ,n N Z 'P o A.� •FS. > m g� z �° s y 49.67 '' v T C1 0 cn+ . z O i� w 1-25-28 E 1 ' 1 14TH PL S. o ml u, ------------- N 151.16 CA) N 1-25-28 EN., N 155.90� to N o T y 45.33 NI W f§ F6.S Z o b y p w .0• J '. Ct I "' y w cn .�`�-.� 71 a h f ° I.co o kN R M En co 1 S. N N m N a ro y ui 0 O 'E f-• N C.3. I O 1p W En 326.30 (P) xn En N k r .3/ 1- -1 Too I 30 271 os W N ^3 xr. 128 mN r NE, C C3 - 8 m ��,. :0 N e co 0 J v C' O ' CO N y m 128 19 .•• t w w w, - o > co • W , o c, LiO _ 3 O ro En f".•—i [139.99) 135 1XC [ 0 '1 A N . tit "� k. (T. N g 1. En > .4 ice} 1-, Is 30 130 0. rs En En 331.94 `''. <1316.95> [138.29[ 13= En ^7 W w <271.95> e� 16TH.AV3 �S VD �u\4 361.14 (P.) W 363.14 Oz)f 196 12s.92 105.42 ZA w//,-- 16TH AVE S . C) Im`- 0 ��� T -I,,,• ? 8 � co� -.I 'ri N• O N O 'O la O ,,, wiWV N X U�1 :J '-, <O - O J ~ [ € «--coc O 30 30 w cn U 155.24 ' r 0o j n I 0 N5. ova b 0 ii Cab, co ° m N 00-17-2DE "'/, '" v'(q w 170 ti ;g192.29 4i � ri: a/y e• o • E , / H ' Project Summary for Pre-application Conference Federal Way Bethel Baptist Church 35905 16th Ave. S. Federal Way,Washington 98003 Project Description Development of new church facilities that include sanctuary, multi-purpose room and support areas with consideration of utilizing the existing facilities. Subject Property Assessor's Information Parcel# #2921049034 Address _ 35905 16m Ave. South Federal Way,WA 98003 Lot Area 120,163 sq. ft. (2.76 acres) Property Type C -COMMERCIAL Use Church/Welfare/Religious Services Note: Property is located in King County. The property is inside limit of City of Federal Way. w r Zoning Designation: Single Family Residential (RS15.0) ° Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single Family Medium Density U Project Summary Gross Area of 3• ` Proposed Building 1st Floor 31,550 Sq. Ft. o 2"a Floor 7,500 Sq. Ft. Total 39,050 Sq. Ft. Type of Construction V-B Occupancy Type A-3 Total Parking 111 Stalls (3.15 occ/stall) Z > ■ Use Church(Sunday) Period Peak hour Code 560 Parameter F Gross Leasable Area 1 1 Quantity 5. 065 Studies 14 Outliers 0 Lower Data Range 1. 000 Upper Data Range 121.000 %Entering 50 Rate 11. 76 Std Dev 8.31 Equation Type Lin Coefficient A 9.590 Constant C 73. 65 R"2 0. 71 Data Close to Rate? Y Data Close to Equation? Y Closest Data Point RATE Trips by Rate 59.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 Trips by Equation 122.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Within Data Range? YES NO NO NO N>2? YES NO NO NO N>19? NO NO NO NO Outliers<5%? YES NA NA NA y-intercept 73.65 NA NA NA Near 0? - NO NA NA NA Std Dev/Rate>1.10? NO NA NA NA R"2>0.75? NO NO NO NO RECOMMENDATION RATE STUDY STUDY STUDY Trips 59.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Rate 1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Equation 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 RESULTS RATE EQUATION AVERAGE Weighted Average 59.56 122.22 90.89 Entering Trips 29.78 61.11 45.45 Exiting Trips 29.78 61.11 45.45 Pass-By% 20.00% 20.00% 20. 00% Total New Trips 47.65 97.78 72.72 Entering New Trips 23.83 48.89 36.36 Exiting New Trips 23.83 48.89 36.36 1-1-1 - 2-- c - 4 Si.eA • Use Church(Sunday) Period Peak hour Code 560 Parameter F Gross Leasable Area I 1 Quantity 39. 050 Studies 14 Outliers 0 Lower Data Range 1.000 Upper Data Range 121. 000 %Entering 50 Rate 11. 76 Std Dev 8.31 Equation Type Lin Coefficient A 9.590 Constant C 73. 65 RA2 0. 71 Data Close to Rate? Y Data Close to Equation? Y Closest Data Point RATE Trips by Rate 459.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Trips by Equation 448.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Within Data Range? YES NO NO NO N>2? YES NO NO NO N>19? NO NO NO NO Outliers<5%? YES NA NA NA y-intercept 73.65 NA NA NA Near 0? NO NA NA NA Std Dev/Rate>1.10? NO NA NA NA R"2>0.75? NO NO NO NO RECOMMENDATION RATE STUDY STUDY STUDY Trips 459.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Rate 1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Equation 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 RESULTS RATE EQUATION AVERAGE Weighted Average 7� 459 2 448.14 453.68 Entering Trips 229.61 224.07 226.84 Exiting Trips 229.61 224.07 226.84 Pass-By% 20. 00% 20. 00% 20.00% Total New Trips 367.38 358.51 362.95 Entering New Trips 183.69 179.26 181.47 Exiting New Trips 183.69 179.26 181.47 N King County Property Description for parcel number 2921049034 Page 1 of 2 'tilt HOME NEWS SERVICES DIRECTORY CONTACT 1 I Search 3 King Cr>unty KCGIS Center Always at your servile www.KingCounty.gov/GIS KCGIS Parcel Reportsrd:.L.' Assessor information for parcel number 2921049034 pK71 Property Report Taxpayer name FEDERAY WAY BETHEL -- Parcel number 2921049034 Districts and Development BAPTIST --•_ _._ .___......._ Conditions Report Mailing address Tax Account 292104903409 P 35905 16TH AVE S number Find Your Council District FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Levy code 1205 Find Your Watershed Jurisdiction FEDERAL WAY KCGIS Center Present use ChurchlWel re/ a ig Srvc Appraised value $576,600 Address(es)at this 35905 16TH AVE S 98003 parcel King County GIS Center Legal description King Street Center 201 S.Jackson St. E 394 FT OF POR OF S 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF STR 29-21-04 LY SLY OF NEAL RD LESS CO RD Suite 706 Seattle,WA 98104 Sales/Quit Claims/Transfers giscenter@kingcounty.gov Sale date Sale Buyer Seller Excise Recording Instrument Sale +47 59909 N price tax number type reason -122.33136 W number 01-02-1997 $400,000 FEDERAL UNITY CHURCH 1523263 199701100574 Warranty None +47° 35'56.72" WAY OF Deed • -122° 19'52.90" BETHEL CHRISTIANITY BAPTIST OF SOUTH KC CHURCH Parcel description Property FEDERAL WAY BETHEL Plat Water WATER name BAPTIST CHURCH name system DISTRICT '3 , Property C COMMERCIAL Plat Sewer PUBLIC -,..,6r r, ._tYPe block system �r- Present Church/Welfare/Relig Srvc Plat lot Access PUBLIC r'7 0 i use Q-S-T- NE-29- Street NONE OR , 3 1- 4 Lot area 120,163 sq.ft(2.76 acres) R 21-4 surface UNKNOWN _ 9- 0` rl ' Commercial building description Building 1 of 2 Building description CHURCH Year built 1918 Predominant use CHURCH(309) Stories 1 Gross sq.ft. %,340 Building quality AVERAGE Net sq.ft. 4,340 Construction class WOOD FRAME Heating system FORCED AIR UNIT Building shape Rect or Slight brag Sprinklers N Elevators Building 2 of 2 Building Classroom Year built 1918 description Stories 1 Predominant use ELEMENTARY SCHOOL(ENTIRE)(365) BuildingqualityLOW COST _._ Gross sq.ft. 725 Construction WOOD FRAME class Net sq.ft. 725 Building shape Rect or Slight Irreg Heating system ELECTRIC WALL Sprinklers N Sprinklers Elevators Taxable value history I I I saIr-, I 14 4 http://www5.kingcounty.gov/kcgisreports/property_report.aspx?PIN=2921049034 /200T King County Property '`escription for parcel number 29210490"" Page 2 of 2 Tax year Tax status Taxable value reason Appraised value Taxable value 2009 EXEMPT EXEMPT $480,600(land) $0(land) +$96,000(improvements) +$00(improvements) $576,600(total) $0(total) 2008 EXEMPT EXEMPT $360,400(land) $0(land) +$93,500(improvements) +$0(improvements) $453,900(total) $0(total) 2007 EXEMPT EXEMPT $240,000(land) $0(land) +1131, 00 9 (improvements) +$0(improvements) $325,900(total) $0(total) Related resources King County Assessor:Submit a request to correct information in this report King County Assessor:eReal Property Report (PDF format requires Acrobat) King County Assessor:Quarter Section Map (PDF format requires Acrobat) King County GIS:Property information FAQ King County GIS:Districts and Development Conditions Report (a detailed report about the location of this property) King County DDES:Permit Applications Report (for unincorporated areas only) King County Treasury Operations:Property Tax Information for this property King County Recorders Office:Excise Tax Affidavits Report King County Recorders Office:Scanned images of plats. King County Recorders Office:Scanned images of surveys and other map documents. Open iMAP to this property (requires a high speed Internet connection) Open Parcel Viewer to this property (any connection speed,but less features than iMAP) • Search: Address or parcel number: Go Reset 0 search by condo name example address:8621 428TH AVE SE I example parcel number:0942000860 This report was generated on 3/9/2009 9:48:02 AM Home I Privacy I Accessibility I Terms of use I Search Contact us at giscenter(a.kingcounty.gov. Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County.By visiting this and other King County web pages,you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. ©2009 King County http://www5.kingcounty.gov/kcgisreports/property_report.aspx?PIN=2921049034 3/9/2009 A- ecc u 1 clr.--0 g' It- 4-d-661 -\., Use Church Period Peak hour Weekday PM Peak hour Code 560 Parameter ' Gross Leasable Area ' 1 f Quantity 39. 050 Studies 12 Outliers 0 Lower Data Range 2. 000 Upper Data Range 126. 000 %Entering 48 Rate 0.55 Std Dev 0.87 Equation Type Coefficient A Constant C R'2 Data Close to Rate? Y Data Close to Equation? N Closest Data Point RATE Trips by Rate 21.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 Trips by Equation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Within Data Range? YES NO NO NO N>2? YES NO NO NO N>19? NO NO NO NO Outliers<5%? NA NA NA NA y-intercept NA NA NA NA Near 0? NA NA NA NA Std Dev/Rate>1.10? YES NA NA NA RA2>0.75? NO NO NO NO RECOMMENDATION STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Rate 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Equation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RESULTS RATE EQUATIOD AVERAGE Weighted Average 1, 21.48 21.48 Entering Trips 10.31 0.00 10.31 Exiting Trips 11.17 0.00 11.17 Pass-By% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% Total New Trips 21.48 0.00 21.48 Entering New Trips 10.31 0.00 10.31 �� �� Exiting New Trips 11.17 0.00 11.17 p�. ,2144C. ICE 2 ' 1 Use Church Period Peak hour Weekday PM Peak hour Code 560 Parameter ' Gross Leasable Area I ' Quantity 5. 065 Studies 12 Outliers 0 Lower Data Range 2. 000 Upper Data Range 126. 000 %Entering 48 Rate 0.55 Std Dev 0. 87 Equation Type Coefficient A Constant C RA2 Data Close to Rate? Y Data Close to Equation? N Closest Data Point RATE Trips by Rate 2.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 Trips by Equation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Within Data Range? YES NO NO NO N>2? YES NO NO NO N>19? NO NO NO NO Outliers<5%? NA NA NA NA y-intercept NA NA NA NA Near 0? NA NA NA NA Std Dev/Rate>1.10? YES NA NA NA R"2>0.75? NO NO NO NO RECOMMENDATION STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Rate 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Equation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RESULTS RATE EQUATIOD AVERAGE Weighted Average , 'fr401; 2:7 2.79 Entering Trips 1.34 0.00 1.34 Exiting Trips 1.45 0.00 1.45 Pass-By% 0.00% 0. 00% 0. 00% Total New Trips 2.79 0.00 2.79 Entering New Trips 1.34 0.00 1.34 Exiting New Trips 1.45 0.00 1.45 Bethel Baptist Church(09-100736-I i-') Page 1 of 1 Bethel Baptist Church (09-100736-00-PC) ,k,.. El LSI r.. i—4„,5,,z III 1,, , I. l', ....4.„ js6 i _2921049105 1 P i L n r r '',-_-, ..... r f I 292104900 fs ! `-1 ( ) t° - 2921049062 # `�.` ' mi11 � 2921049132 / Ni p2io49o541 2921049068 1 111 L I I I I el I - --_ _ - 721t_ 12 — I . - I I I r.. Al. 1 ) r- 2821049110 no -1-- ----- J _ - ____\ 11 g` I f 2921049034 I 2821049111 6093344050 y _ 1 _ `�1 _• �� 1:3` `1' _ r I1/1-1 ��609330004fl 2821049009 ---- o r• '� e. II .r---� --___ t (----, ti 24 -„,` �4 110 .- ( t° 2921049025 (0I __ \It r-\ ( . 1 )1 L ^"� + 2821049107 0 r`a—�� i it l 41� TO 1 ao 1, i 1 ©2006:Lakehaven Utility District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of any facility information shown.Facility locations and conditions are subject to field verification. http://columbia/lion/map.aspx 3/10/2009 BcRA iii--� FEDAL WAY BLIHEL BAPTIST CHURII MASTER PLAN*ING 3- D MODEL VIEW FEBRUARY 26TH, 2009 1 r ._ • )-? _ -\ - __ • / �� ___- ,I ,Z4,41 1. . . 11•10/0/ y S _e - :A . , ''tir Ilk , -___-__ -r. ------- ------- :' ' 111111-irlilli22.111,1111111111-L1117-._---i;; ''' P II Ai It.- m 1 1, 1 _I 11�fI•,' , 41 _ i .1 R �` ' • ' N r1 'Il -------------------- \ —2-- - - - - • ._. BR jk FED I All.... WAY BETHEL BAPTIST CHURL . I MASTER PLANING La 3- D MODEL VIEW FEBRUARY 26TH, 2009 ,/ . . ......„._ . ....... 4....„. ........... ........ _ ___ /4w:4ft,-,-----7 --_, ------- lowAspy -.sillk ' ___ _ _..,,. __------ -------,.. .._______ 77. all -...-•!J?El .- . . ., 11. ._......„ .<.\--._ , 4._.0,. .,,,, „it 1 V f _ . .,,, ,f I, j I -.. ' - • ,,- ---- , - _ :-_---_-------- ,------n-- - ----.1:1 ,... ___----- — .• -- -i--- at, :411".111111AV _. _____, _-----—- ., .1 wAvonsi --- ---- - __ _____ :' •-_.. - f) I '-.....--_. -ttil I* --,..--. -g.^.•••••• _______ T.--......-- Wr.,. ' .AO - - --. .'Of' A AP' ' '-7 '-'-'*----..'--. 1,..11•1 •. .h. -' --r-- -,_........._ , ,- _. .....,0 -.D., it -- - • __ .41flpar-, ) __ tips , __ 11"L-- OM- 07,1, I, I _. _ I 1 .0 - . _ •-__,-----____- -- -,---_-,.--cialliftipto----• _,„ - ---------- -- -mpg- -... P1111.-11,,,, ,--:---- - • -_.,;,,.._ '_:•-1.-- -,..1.- - - -----.- 1"01111rvii0,,r- -Anus-- ,.. i. 1 ii..• 1 .--,-- —_,_ •••,. -- -6*"*4--- 1 .....,k, _____________ _----4- --dinmh_01....,:_____ ___ I ' - _O 1 1, dr --Ai__. 0`'`- -_ -'z''- • . . - .._ _ -44"04-- 1 1, 77 _ 1, %... • ,-„ --- •---- -------, :_. • -4ilipP, _ • _ it. ----..........‹-)Pr 1 I -- • .,..- -- -76:2•-• ,k• .. "ilite.-- -Aft!! ______ , _ _ . __Alis14> - -.,..... -. ,...... AP' ---11 .41/4„,,,,,' ' t - - - ____ _, . ciatio. ., - -f ' - ', ..--- -.44- :e ----- - deli'''. 111--- • t i. t---•_ --- - . .. . 2 f, - ..: ' .3i _ - , •s .,---.:-. 7...' . - --- -----". ..4Fr• 4- -- - * ' IV Or) 14 ---- 4 '--- - - = ---/- -_4 ..,0 ____ 1,# !A -----'; :--_,- _.,....______. - t :F . - - ... _ ----'...i.- --. • ...---, , ,..--7---. -._ .. , .. - - 1-1110r: ....„.. _- - _ ---) ,c,-7--_--,`-ft,-;':•71-4,F. ,*,. - :. - _ 4,,,e,...4_11 • --, •_-__--,,z--r- , _ --.....,,. _. 1. .,,t,"f' . _.. _.• -7:...._,,r• --. ---.. 'A." / —- - ••, - .• - • • • -- 1 '--- --- -.-____ 111111ftp, - --. 7 C,---! -.- - - --_. .•'_- il OP y i 4 . I E -111W---- , A ..... I. ...r A• i -.___ z... f ' ..„ ., • ..,........,__________i_____________< III ---- ---- •-.. _ _ ._ _ -- ---_,..„,........_ • _ - ..., - ' -'-'---• . ...- _ - - ir. -'''i;•-•- ,-i,' r. - - :--1- 41011111P , •:.. .1* f... "\11111---11:•'-‘2\Ilk:.- .' .4-.„. -•. • ,-:- ..... ... . .. .._,_ .. .... aigt, .„. . 0 ------___ -ler - --- - - . ---.. - "---- -... ---: --'-', . . -----'''-----.. .- . .' . -----. ..-,-.., ----.....,, -'- '-----..-41 ------4., - -.-i: -T-I. - - -- - --:: _f ___ B CRA .........._ . li rAL WAy EP ._ • A • it - - - - ' _ , Rc _ . , , A , „ _,............. __, ____ _____ __ .lipw - f W. ' • *. ....... -'-:i..".4 D ODEL VIEW • • r Y 26TH, 2009 I . .1;4; 41,..-r: - _ • Et2 .- . __. ., Poi ,1111'0' ,Ill , - - - - , • • ' ' t " 11 I' IN .14 ,„_--7- --..--,- . - ;3_ -- ••,- ,..... t'i t=ri ,. .. . -46944 4 - I r * - 1111,, MI oMi EMI -. ' ill 1 ! it ill: I 411:--N1 I 'Ili r 1 , • lilt l'Il . III. ie. .I 01 ' ' i , #. , - 1 k-;' --" N _ % 4 rkiii t - ' .v. , ' . s , . s . raMe-stke.--ielf_-)11.4 -- 4° . ti i t. • ._ - 1 . ill ,.. iai' -.----• . I! . , ----. 4' t _ I _ Ti I 1 1 4 e„ ... ,. 11 *4 ,, . i. !.., I, Liz' I I ''-. - - _.r. . 1 I - •14) ' I-151 '.. 71- I 1 111 iv mit , T-1- • sl ... / _ / . _ 1 1 ___ .,_____ __„ __ ._ • __,..-,„, ____ , - ---.,•_-,..[.', *4 1 ' t 4 ' • ,, h g , .i I 11;11 tr, : , . . ,,,, AilL \\ 1 ' * ,,,j_ T------------.T . --_ • , At . , '4 ......w.k,d, 1 . 41, , to',...,,,:_„ 1 " i 111,0,,,Irto ----:„....#\ lop/ iiil ..../ I "?..,... - ...,....,, art4711iiiii„ t - alio'. 1 1 0: liilkAilli - . apAr.7.. '.'-a sewn. , figl. - itkr!.<1 *- 4.. •- _- - ! - = i -1 -Atr il ar, 101. _ _ 1 „.;„ •• I .,..-- f ;:---- -- - - -4- -It 1, 0 IL t iArlif1l 0, _ , I 1 --1 - --- _,_ 11111RNY6 ' ' __ ,__ • - - alhl ' ---,---- - - -3--, -- - L_ -11 - I - _ , - f Eye alt 71811 '---1---- - - I----,46111U2 t- --=,,-,*--,-- ---.--,-- 40..,11.a., 1'1'7. 41'16'40 58- N 122 is, :. _ - _ _ __ _ 7,1f_ik„ BcRA ai FEDAL WAY BETHEL BAPTIST CHURC. . MASTER PLAN _ _ INC 3- D MODEL VIEW FEBRUARY 26TH, 2009 • '- . 1in111, -_ ___ Tom. �� - _ . -N- c4t.at 1 -- ------- - _ -- _:7-.";-_-._..=•- .___ -._._ . p.tr.{; i aye--_ ._ - _ �--_ �—' `3 1. A. �- T iAir- r t_'�` rt ,o f r ram' K CD ___,. , ,,„ % _ ,, ________ . 1 li . iiilliallili , i' t---- :F<, 6. -- 16 . —. t(= '' ' - -7—« 1 16 __J _i a - w I �I - _-a 4 -tea . 0131r i. ! — — ,°° __ li 1 i ? _______________4: '* Tit() \-- ____-----________ _ ______:.,,___ _ _ ____- \, -___ ___ _ ____.iiik T __ y . _..--.!r rr- FEDERAL WAY BETHEL BAPTIST CtIRJRCH MASTER 1 LAMING itA: • . • B c 1 1 1 3- D MODEL VIEW FEBRUARY 26TH, 2009 4.... „. . . _____________ - -- 0„..-.1::,___-- :, ,--:,,.-..: -,--..,..-_-__L- :. ,,-•. . , ...._.,. _ . . -__„..,,,_ - - -. ,,,,:1--„,...,(... Pne.'.8.!1-'' :, : ' --••••,-- -,..:: . _ -_ • - [• . ‘. --...._ e I irjli--.. ._- '- - ••• :7- -.-1 • '7- 4: ' il I.....,1111. i. :-----"'--------"-.1 --,-,_-__ / -- - 41111*. -------____ 1---- 1.4 ..,...-Tip.Oil-'j.:,-=..---,- __ ___ ..;,.. —t-,- -77- t711-7firmin11.7.---- 7 . ..._ _ .. • . „. 4 "roa.' . .:_ . ,„,_,_-- — -, _ _. 1.-, ___._____, --•.:_._ __ 1 i 1 -'--------a--- ----,- - - ---___ ----.. -- -- '4 ------:------- - 4, .00ipt,. ,. , ,„, • „ , 14.7"----<---- --- _ .___ wer _.--er , INVarvii-"!". •• ____ .. ot.4- • . .v!„! li Al ' --'"%:--'- ----------- 1., . .11- , -"ifthe.....,........ IQ 'tr. lib . i111111 .. L . ,,,,....., ' 4 .....• -., . ' • ' '..:1N ....M.111.... . ' .. .....'' 11. t . ''' ........ ......410... Or._.,- ........ IV . . ‘, • '4.1. r . I A, • ::-''' 111 , r- -...-..._,_ •••--4.or i f -..............;._7=- 11111146 i I I. - . 4 , •..._ ..,- ' ...r.".11‘, • t..w . •,_ . i kt% .iir -- _ i----------------...* ------ ---_____ .•..._ / IliPl _ ,..,..... - . - ... .,....- y fidi -----___ , 1- . "Aiitt.• -... --------- i 1 ---.-----'" %b• illifi. -- ''. - • 4!!,..-...._.,- i g • -....,,,,ii ,.....,... ft,„, ..t... -. .-- ....! --, ,,,,, 4..._---# . .._- --_,,,,----::- . . rlz .i,.._-_--- .. .., • --- -=-- - - -46,-- •••-• ' 1--',..---r'- owe ,._ - '',....„,,,,,. ,, ., lb. • 9•11 , 2,,,....i........- „..!:.,-. ...... 1.,, - --'-"- 40,#*' ......-- '- ' - •-- _.. ''...._ - ' -¢..,,,, -.--- . _::---- - '-'. _ ..• ..,,-___,___ .11.1.11 10101041 _- - , -111W: ..,.. ....,_.__ __-______ , i ,.• '... -- - --"."'- ...--- - . . ..... '--- -•-.1 . - _Z'--. - .. ,. . • itt .,--= -7_-__ "- - .- ,xiiiter ''- ----= Air:---. , • '...... ' ,. '-' - --. - '101111: - .11111111*6' • '-''- ,,.... ......,_- ..: _„.. -:.:Iiiii,..„ _-•.-...- --- - ...***"."."7.". BC A ....„... FELIRAL WAY BErHEL BAPTIST CHURC. , MASTER PUAING 11 ,.. iii 3- D MODEL VIEW FEBRUARY 26TH, 2009 .....,_ \., 101,k,L__, . ,...,_ ,•••.-- • _ _ , ..., • ----- ,_ .,...„ , ._,. .,,,,,,,•_,„ _ ___ ..,._ ___ , ••_......._•,.,___ _,,,„ • _ _-,..... , ••,. - ,_,,.. ..-......- . .__- .,..,....7,.. .... _ . --- - ,,. : ,,,... „., ..... ,.....,,. • ...„...._11' k .., 4,_,.......vo' C''''"'"". _--- 1 7------- - ,r.;-------,.=:.•-.-.-,7,11 I .' • ''''''...,, -1 - ... .ai---s..'---'--..--- ---- ------ __„...___-...----paplillfr---- 1 : :-'.. -7.----'..e: :.: Pi -- - _ r•. ,.: .t,, . _., i._,,,,46.---...,____,..„,,i. ,,._, ..-.."_,..L._ " -n:7'::.:''7::---"--4 r- _ ke, _----- ,,, ,- 110* _____ .11311 ....".•••""'-*.iiii so. •-'1.-161-- . 1 .'"-- .4110.• 111 i ° 0.1.-,, --"' ... .,,,,,, • - —• ,...... _ 1,,,,:ilig', ,.....,114-' \'-•-,,,,, —77-1 `- ''---..i -..,1_.t .'-• "Fi--••• --",,,;---...,--i',dill !*I 00-1::''T:1:1 lt`' :-------‘11- . 4."-- - ._:,-__• -- --.--'""*"."--- ''---------: ,-.47;,--5.7.-41.7. ___:. -..- -- iliger,..,07.1_, , , - .,?,•,.,-,;ti.i.,,,,,,,,,.,...1 i: ,,,....ia. ‘ii,..."--"-, . • _— ----______,...„..„....- _...,...,./ .144--- ..., ., -.4.. . Al116; --016 -. . „,... .. ..„. .... .,....• . %, .: , \ 17" -* 7,.. _ .._ i.-- 1 i _ F .-7: -• ---1- .e...„,. .. . ',....1.:-,A• , , _...1._. 4 I .. ":-..-•' ... .------' . '41* till 0 i -- ' V ,-, • -__ ... . ,._,.. ...4.40,. .....c.,..,,. a . _ - •*..%•. ' . '. '',, : .;' e° I '11. . _ . 1111S111 • :7; ' t; t 7-:...- .,: . ,.....-- • -, ...___ . ........ ,• ,...... . ---- ___....... _____ I. , . • I -- - ....4- . . -. . .„„ 4row• .„... ....• .,...-- -..-...,,.... ...., - ,-,:__._ ..ef.-, -, .._ ,... .,.. -...,- „, '4---- ,.?,'.',.....- .. . ' Ir.• '*le - -'- tt .;*.-., „/;.'''44111 -- ,.,. at.• 1411141/' , ,.. .. __--- .r .i - _ 1 liskit - ' •a --...„ --. Illpitigir -3 -• :., ,..-v., . - '""•,, ------- . ..,--- -._,•...,,_ ._ •.... - • r- , ...N ti-f-- '1, / .4' 4.4.:.-•:-'-..'.-c ...,_ . ';:,' . c•• „..,-.. _... _._., - ---.... •-•• . i „ , .. ,.,-. ,.. ,...,. ,,.. .:• ._ '-'41. ;Lai: ,..• - 4 • ' 14 • ,.. . ::.iiii '•: .., -„..... N._ . , ...11 .., f,1iC, - - - - ' • • .. --•-N... -- 1. ar- -,..•-• •-_ 1 . --.. :-..... ... _ . 411111.11614,.', ' ,,, 'ifr-. -- _ „,, • N _ ---'''' - - - NI,. - ,,,,, , - - -.0-, N _ - - ,--. 7-,'--= ''-'- -' -. • ,..,-, ---,_=;: _ — % =0' --- -<„,--" . 1111111b'Alit.,. - . t. - 1 •- _ __ :,_, .. - ,..__,__,, ,•-.- - .w._)•^".__ „. ...s. .-,_,.,-,-,,,,,_._..___..., ,, , ‘'',.SLI 30'-0" SETBACK 40 YFrv# 158-0" R 17 17 mamom 364'-0" F�c�o�oo�o f A f ♦ 0.0 �Q m� N � 146-0" 30'-0" SETBACK 0 STREET IMPROVEMENT (CURB, GUTTER, & SIDEWALK) ON S. 359TH STREET - t� SITE P LAN W w SCALE: 1 "=20' Elm GROUND FLOOR PLAN a o Q m O . cn 0 Ln N ry 0 Lil Li Li O X) m 1 � t PROJECT SUMMARY SITE AREA: 120,163 SF (2.76 ACRES) GROSS AREA OF PROPOSED BUILDING: 1 ST FLOOR: 31,550 SF 2ND FLOOR: 7,500 SF TOTAL: 39,050 SF TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B OCCUPANCY TYPE: A-3 TOTAL PARKING: 111 STALLS (3.15 OCC/STALL) �I�i'x2o� fr. 7 �:sna'aM -qN UPP R FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 API r RECEIVED NORTH FEB 2 6 2009 Y CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS co aCQ co o ■ C 0 M F A1.1 MASTER PLANNING it •• In I .... lef t 591: ��E u aus 8sab^xuw tary x aar s iI AVERAGE BUILDING - y ELEVATION 5 EY m sbrMol a -Mi � p3 t �srt �� ���t.a�aP h: �� i t N t r R 41 i itw Pitji f �� Y 'v� �7 CYi�t. i �.' .}- � 3 . +tl�y''M'�LR ♦�- x�� 4 i F ♦ .aa S 1 NEI -. - .. h — M let WIV x low-, ; i .._... 4� �;p� 1 M x c i "'.''E".1 S. 'yy ♦, ��' t � l , � Y�3/ / , ♦f1' tY.. y,, �' gyp✓ ' , ��•:n Ays.�� _. ...�t,' � � �:,`J• J � t w \' /yrT p'v'ti1r.:,. �.' - �. �'rY .wf' '."fit �- >j t • y�Y�e �n � ` r a, w5 r, e t 4 •yff 4 a,' 13,i W.,