The URL can be used to link to this page

08-101215 (2) FILE 1146, CITY OF CITY HALL . 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway corn January 2, 2009 Feather Billings Jon Graves Architects 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D Tacoma, WA 98402 RE: File#08-101215-00-UP; CEDARS REDESIGN 33430 13th Place South,Federal Way Dear Ms. Billings: The City of Federal Way has completed the Land Use Process III review of the proposed new 3-story 18,288 square-foot commercial building with retail and office space submitted on March 12, 2008. The site plan application submitted on March 12, 2008,and the subsequent resubmittals on September 26, 2008, are hereby approved per the enclosed Exhibit A, Findings for Project Approval. The remainder of this letter outlines future review processes required, gives a brief summary of the process under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) to date, and outlines procedure relating to appeals and approval periods for this decision. Additional requirements will be provided as City departments review the building permits submitted for the improvements. REVIEW PROCESSES REQUIRED Zoning for the subject site is Community Business(BC). Office/Retail is an allowed use in this zone under Federal Way City Code(FWCC) 22-751, Office/Retail. The Office/Retail use is normally revnws-,1 under the Process II Project Approval review process. However, a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)review was triggered due to the increased square footage of the new building. Therefore, the City reviewed this project under a Process III review. Project approval does not grant license to begin any type of site work. SEPA PROCESS A Notice of Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS)was issued on October 4, 2008.There were no comments regarding the application. The City issued the formal DNS on October 20, 2008, and the appeal period for this determination was completed on November 3,2008, with no appeals filed. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Unless modified or appealed, the project approval decision is valid for a period of one year from the date of issuance of the decision. If no further action is taken within one year of the date of issuance, the decision will expire.One, one-year extension may be granted only if a written request is submitted to the Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718, at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the decision. The project approval decision may be appealed by the applicant pursuant to FWCC Section 22-396. Any appeal must be in the form of a letter delivered to the Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718, and be accompanied by the • Ms. Billings January 2,2009 Page 2 established fee, within 14 calendar days after the effective date of issuance of this decision. The effective date of issuance is the date of the decision plus three calendar days,or January 5, 2008.The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the factual findings and conclusions of the Director of Community Development Services disputed by the person filing the appeal. This decision does not constitute building permit approval,and it does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Construction permits are required for the proposed improvements. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact David Lee, Associate Planner, 253-835- 2622. • Sincerely, - Greg Fewins, Director Community Development Services enc: Exhibit A-Findings for Approval Approved Site Plan c: David Lee,Associate Planner 08-101215 Doc.I.D.47551 • F LE CITY OF Federal Way CEDAR PARK OFFICE AT WEST CAMPUS FINDINGS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL FILE #08-101215-00-UP The following are findings for recommending approval of a new office building with associated site improvements located at 33430 13th Place South in Federal Way. 1. The applicant proposes the construction of a 3-story, 18,288 square-foot commercial building with office and retail uses. Project includes 61 new parking stalls, landscaping, and associated site improvements. 2. Zoriug for the subject site is Community Business(BC). Office and retail uses are permitted in the BC zoning district pursuant to Federal Way City Code(FWCC) Section 22-751 subject to Pro ss III,Project Approval.The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) designation for the subject site is Office. 3. The City issued a Notice of Land Use Application on April 12,2008, following determination of a complete application. A fourteen-day comment period resulted from the notice date.No comments were received on the land use application or SEPA Checklist notice. 4. The responsible official of the City of Federal Way issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)on October 4, 2008,pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).The fourteen-day appeal period for the determination was completed on October 28, 2008,with no corrections to the city's initial determination. The final staff evaluation for the environmental checklist,Federal Way File#08-101216-00-SE, is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. 5. An off-site Major Stream was identified to the east of the proposed development on a neighboring parcel. The associated 100' stream buffer is also located offsite and is not impacted by the proposed development. 6. Drainage components shall conform to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM)and City amendments. The existing surface water runoff from the site presently is divided into two basins.The applicant has proposed to install a stormwater conveyance system for the parking lot and roof drainage. The parking lot storm flows will be treated for water quality using an underground 7 cartridge StormFilter®.The parking lot storm flows will then be released into the existing storm sewer located at the southwest corner of the site. The project lies within the Hylebos Creek Basin. The proposed water quality facility is intended to meet the requirements of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan. 7. Access to the subject site will be from 13th Avenue South and from an existing 40-foot-wide private ingress/egress utility easement located along the northern portion of the site.These existing systems do not meet Federal Way standards for required right-of-way improvements. Accordingly,based on a request by the applicant,the Public Works Director in a April 8,2008 letter, granted modification to required 13`h Avenue South right-of-way improvements to permit use of existing pavement and improvements.The Comprehensive Plan designates 13th Place South as a Type"R"street,consisting of a 40' street with curb and gutter, four-foot planter strips with street trees, six-foot sidewalks, and street lights in a 66-foot right-of-way.Existing improvements along 13`h Place South consist of a 48' street with eight-foot sidewalk abutting the curb,all within a 64' right-of-way. Full improvements as required would not be harmonious or function safely with the existing improvements.Further,the Director granted modification to required 150' driveway spacing requirement. Since the existing driveway configurations of neighboring properties along 13th Place South will not allow driveway access for this site to meet the required 150' spacing,the applicant may install a driveway approximately half-way between the north and south property lines. This configuration will allow for the best possible distance between accesses.The existing driveway onto 13th Place South shall be closed. 8. The proposed development has been designed to provide optimal placement of parking and building improvements.The 61 minimum required parking stalls for the 18,288 square-foot building is met on site. Internal two-way drive aisles are proposed around the new office building and 13th Avenue South, as well as north of the new building to a private 40'-wide ingress/egress easement.Parking lot landscaping, in accordance to FWCC Article XVII "Landscaping" will be incorporated throughout the parking lot area. 9. Under FWCC Section 22-751, Office/Retail uses located in the BC zoning district do not have minimum required structural setbacks.The site plan shows that these setback requirements,as well as setbacks from ingress/egress, drainage, and utility easements, are met. 10. Landscape plans prepared by Jon Graves Architects&Planners revised date September 26, 2008, depicts required width of perimeter landscape areas pursuant to FWCC Section 22- 1566(f),BC zoning. Specifically, five feet of Type III landscaping shall be provided along the entire perimeter property lines.A total of 1,342 square feet of interior parking lot landscaping is required for the 61 parking stalls.The site plan contains 1,430 square feet of Type IV interior parking lot landscaping, satisfying code requirement of 22 square feet of parking lot landscaping per stall. Final landscape plans will be reviewed with construction permits to ensure compliance with the FWCC. 11. Site and architectural design is consistent with FWCC Chapter 22,Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines,"based on provision of the following key design elements: a. The new office building will be oriented to the 13th Avenue South right-of-way,and features a large 3-story metal mosaic cladding system, canopies,and the intermingling of various architectural materials to visually articulate the main entry to the building. b. Decorative cornices will be used along the roof line to avoid the appearance of a flat roof. c. Horizontally situated banks of insulated anodized aluminum storefront windows line the building facades. d. The western facade,which is longer than 60 feet and visible from the right-of-way, contains code required facade treatment methods of facade modulation,a 225 square- foot plaza,which features benches and special landscaping, and a canopied entry. Cedar Park Office at West Campus Page 2 Findings for Project Approval File#08-101216-00-UP/oc I o.47553 e. An internal concrete walkway provides pedestrian route of travel from the main entrance to the 13`h Avenue South right-of-way and to the ingress/egress easement to the north.The pedestrian pathways to the ingress/egress easement and 13`h Avenue South will be delineated by a Scofield stamped concrete in Ashler stone. f. The application demonstrates overall continuity of architectural design while implementing current design standards. 12. The applicant submitted a Concurrency application that has been reviewed by Public Works Traffic staff.The staff report of the Concurrency analysis identifies required mitigation measures for Process III Project Approval, addresses any failures of the City's Level of Service (LOS) standard, and provides for the collection of pro-rata share mitigation towards the City's Transportation Improvement Plan(TIP)projects impacted by the proposed development.The final staff evaluation for the Concurrency application,Federal Way File#08-101218-00-CN, is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.The concurrency analysis concluded that the proposed project does not impact any TIP projects by one or more trips; and therefore,no mitigation is necessary. 13. The proposed site plan application and application attachments have been determined to be consistent with the FWCP,with all applicable provisions of the FWCC, and with the public health, safety, and welfare.The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal,and the proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access.The proposed development is consistent with Process III,Project Approval, decisional criteria required under FWCC Section 22-395(b). The proposed site plan and application attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the FWCP, rtinent zoning regulations, and all other applicable City regulations.Final construction drawings will be reviewed for compliance with specific regulations, conditions of approval, and other applicable City requirements.This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes,policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: David Lee,Associate Planner Date:December 29,2008 Cedar Park Office at West Campus Page 3 Findings for Project Approval File#08-101216-00-UP/o0 t.o.47553 / ;�: :_ \ JON GRAVES ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS, PLLC vivo, 31 10 fiUSTON UJRY, TFIFI UJA 01 TEL ( 253 ) 272 -421 4SU ITE D FAX ( 2COM53,) 272 984-421 82 JGAlr ACHS . COM September 17,2008 RESUBMITTED Mr. David Lee S E P 2 6 2008 Planning Department City of Federal Way CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PO Box 9718 BUILDING DEPT. Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 RE: File#08-101215-00-UP—ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED Cedar's Re-Design 33430 13th Place South,Federal Way Dear David: Thanks for your comment letter dated September 11, 2008. The following is our response to these City comments. Please note that when applicable,the drawings have been modified and any related changes made are denoted with revision clouds and an associated delta symbol#2.Also, note that additional information has been added to the drawings,but only items that are addressed in response to the Process III application have been called out with revision clouds in-the attached drawings. PLANNING 1. The parking lot has been revised and now provides interior lot landscaping in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1567(b)(1)(a)(I). At,current calculation, 1,405 square feet of parking lot landscaping has been indicated in the plan,which is over the required 1,386 square feet. Please see the revised architectural drawing Sheet A 1.0 for documentation of these area calculations. Please also see revised Landscape Drawing Sheet L-1 and Ir-1, Civil Drawing Sheets SP-1 and GR-1, and Electrical Drawing Sheets E 1.0, E2.0, E3.0 and E4.0. 2. The pedestrian connection now indicates the colors and materials used to provide variation in paved texture and color in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(2). The pedestrian connection will use stamped concrete texture in Scofield 905 Ashler Stone and color combination in C-27 Westwood Brown and 5178 Stetson Buff. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT 1. Per Brian Asbury, as it stands, only one fire hydrant on the SW portion needs to be relocated with the other existing hydrant along 13th place.Due to the minimal amount of work that needs to be done, Lakehaven Utility District has agreed to bypass the Pre-Design meeting. It is our understanding that Brian Asbury has received a cost estimate from Lakehaven FieldOPS and is currently preparing the Facilities Installation Agreement. The FIA will be sent to the Owner for signature and sent back to Lakehaven Utility District with required deposit. Sinc rely, Bre Project Architect JON GRAVES ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS, PLLC 3110 RUSTON WAY, SUITE D TACOMR, WA 98402 TEL (253) 272-4214 FAX (253) 272-4218 Stamped Concrete - Ashler Stone: Embossing Skin Pattern Page 1 of 1 ►PRODUCTS /TECH-DATA ►MSDS 0. ►TRAINING ► LITERATURE ►TOOLKIT a— INN MAIL A LINK TO THIS PAGE SEARCH I SITE MAP I CONTACT US HOME I♦. SCOFIELD SYSTEMS. erig[L e_ered_syatP L7i s_-. Nome>ScQfieid_ cociucts>LITHOTEX®Pavecrafters®>Stamped Concrete Tool Patterns ® _ � ,W professional imprinting tools and embossingskins LITHOTEX vecra rs p for authentic textures and realistic patterns F, , 1 '' ; � " , z-•'-' EMBOSSING SKINS 'fi <. f s `" I $ ', Pattern: t * �*40t ' �. Ashler Stone Embossing Skin ( , t. , ;°�AL A; .1.,—)-' Tool size(approximate inches): " , r �..�.7 24 x 24 F I '- r 42 x 42 r. -`� ,a „N•e. > 52 x 52 ,r � ; •,4 Order number:905S, 905M, 905L 3 , `'� �.aa 4,.z , t t wr» ',' ., tom ',� — a f ��4t.� ', +^ r «T' t lr r �_ i t s .i w . + 5 'w7 Y „t.n„ w A_..° �^ i s I m1f _ ism '. ',e c4.. ..., a ` LITHOCHROME®Color Hardener 5183 Stone Gray n ;" ,r ?: t LITHOCHROME®Color Hardener A-51 Steadman Buff � '^'� � 1..""T, `� r LITHOCHROME®Antiquing Release 5911 Walnut&1101 Classic Gray r y^t SCOFIELD®Cureseal-Wm Semi Gloss has been used on all samples. • „� + t !r,r : t.%,. r d . Also available: Ashler Stone Random intedQcki • [Witco CUSTOMER SERVICE 1-800-800-9900 0 CONTACT US 0 OFFICE LOCATIONS Decorative Concretes ,4t9S,&)Tech-Data I MSDS I Decorative Concrete TrainingI p .orative COnerete L.It@velure Golorod Concrete I Stamped Concrete I Concrete Stain I Concrete Overlay I Concrete ReatrrtactELI Decorativ_EQncrete$ cnymE 02007 L.M.Scofield Company.All rights reserved. No part of this web site may be reproduced without the express written consent of the L.M.Scofield Company. C _:;i To report technical problems when attempting to use this website please contact thewgbmastgr. http://www.scofield.com/stainpedconcrete_patternsll.html 9/17/2008 Concrete Color Chart- Scofield's CHROMIX®Admixtures for Color-Conditioned Concr... Page 1 of 2 - I-PRODUCTS F.TECH-DATA ►MSDS ►SHOWCASE ►TRAINING I.LITERATURE ►ARCHITECTS }DISTRIBUTORS III MAIL A LINK TO THIS PAGE _, S®t. SCOFIELD p AaaAederandMame ..`r�•4 SYSTEMS e�,'. g I ri e r d . y s t i is - H011a>Scofield Pro II its>CHROMIXO Admixtures QUICK LINKS CHROMIX°Admixtures • 5 °V t 5 or_c"t3Q =- !°tta• for Color-Conditionede Concrete • 5 Standards ns ns • ASTM 8ta strength and beauty • CHROMIX Protect Gallery • Crlrtg Standard Colors • Technical Data Bulletin • tASDS • Siockintl Distributors. • Contractor Sttee1.1F.P_El • 5urtaoe Prep Guide 5130 5234 0288 6053 Spring Serge Summer Berge Autumn Berge Wrier Be'.ge ';, 3987 5059 1268 5238 Porce'a'.n Gray Setrento Red Cool Gray Sucha-reed C4ay . 1' \ 1010 C-11 C-20 C-25 • • Bravnslore Desert Sard ;• lhnes!ore Scmhrern Bull- - • • rS I illl ram, - � ,„ f � � c-zs a-1a az1 C-15 Antique Co-., esa Re De �\dcbe Tan Coachete Sand C-27 C-I3 �_----- C-22 C-32 1 :z ,.,x I w•"r..n" 1 V:estu:ood Brea- Tac;ny I' Coral Red Quarry Red .t— t• #'vr'.' _^ C-31 C 1 C 2 4 C.34 Shadow Slate French Gray Charcoal Darn Gray Custom Colors / http://www.scofield.com/coloredconcrete_colors.html 9/17/2008 Concrete Color Chart-Scofield's CHROMIX®Admixtures for Color-Conditioned Concr... Page 2 of 2 1019 4662 1014 1967 Bridgeport Beige Santa Fe Tile Canyon Tan Fiesta Red 3292 5402 4302 1015 Nava;o Red Taos Taupe Roman Trte Etruscan Ti'e 5460 1734 3410 5265 Timbertne Tan English Rose Nutmeg Brown Surrey Beige C-29 1589 3237 1017 Dusty Mauve Durango Brown Musky Mulberry Barcelona Brown 1906 4821 1677 6213 Fennel Green Shady Red Eldorado Tan Go':ien Mano 3172 1078 5178 4959 Moonlight Gray Chicory Spice Stetson Buff Smoky Plum Concrete colors shown approximate the color of broom.fniahed colored concrete flahvork made with a medium•gray cement and cured with LITHOCHROME®Cotorwaxry or COLORCURE®Concrete Sealer in the matching color. Concrete not so cured will have less brilliance.Concrete should be batched and placed in accordance with Tech-Dale Bulletin A-304. Please note:concrete colors shown are approximate.Due to shade variations associated with individual color monitors and printers.we suggest utilization of our literature request form to review an actual CHROMIX®Admixtures Color Chart.We strongly recommend that a test slab be poured and approved prior to starting the lob.Test slabs should be poured replicating lobsite conditions. Yv�t'}{. y N/.�.pp�y�i -triiS e :zafYx+a 4 ry// Wndl ;—0 crin*i 'mar-o� 1.YMI'�1.WRlt�v �rUSTtfit'S�AG�� i1" Ji30 , ,�i' Decrative Co_ncrgte�+todecls.)Teoh_I?.8tei MMDS$Decorative Caudate.Tdatnitt i DS.eurative.Cenctel8_Llttteete. Colored Coocretei Slsmp d P.O.Mawei Co een1e�igl Concrete Resu•*aytio 1 Decorative Concrettydews S2008 L.M.Scofield Company.All tights reserved. No part of this web site may be reproduced without the express written consent of the L.M.Scofield Company. S ,g :ecs To report technical problems when attempting to use this website please contact .;,w,...b.znaE;C http://www.scofield.com/coloredconcrete_colors.html 9/17/2008 L. A 4 r : u • CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Cedars Redesign Project Description: New 3-story, 18,288sqft commercial building with retail on first floor and office space on upper floors_ Project includes related site improvements. Applicant: Jon Graves Architects, 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D,Tacoma, WA 98402 Agent: Same as applicant Owner: Tom Pierson, PO Box 502, Milton, WA 98354 Project Location: 33430 13th Place South(Parcel #768190-0010) Date Application Received: March 12, 2008 Date Determined Complete: April 3, 2008 Date of Notice of Application: April 12, 2008 Comment Deadline: 5 p.m., April 28, 2008 Permits Required: Land Use Process III(08-101215-00-UP) SEPA Determination: File#08-101216-00-SE Other Permits Known at this Time and not Included in this Application: Building Permit/ Engineering Approval Relevant Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist, Stormwater/Drainage Technical Information Report(TIR) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations to be used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Any person may submit written comments on the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community Development Services by 5:00 p.m. on April 28,2008.Details of appeal procedures for the requested environmental decision will be included with the written decision. Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including the FWCC environmental and zoning codes; surface and stormwater management codes; King County Road Standards; and King County Surface Water Design Manual. City Contact: Associate Planner David Lee, 253-835-2622 The official file is available for public review at the City of Federal Way, Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on April 12,2008. Doc I D 44977 Map Date:October 27,2006 City of Federal Way City of Resident Mailir P.0 8oz9718 33325 8th Ave S. Federal WayNotification Area Federalwaywa.98o63 (206)-835-7000 www.cityortederalwaycom 172104 9035 172104 172104 9059 172104 172104 y�1 9138 9049 172104 9100 172104 9033 172104 9064 926501 0050 172104 9020 172104 9122 926501 172104 0040 9026 7681902. 0040' 768190 768190 768190 0060 0050 619 2030" 926501 786; 0036 16 _ 1721a 904' - - y�3+ 188190 6070 x 768*90 r Y' lj 1,,01'J N 1 s 1 1044 96503 > 926501 20533 Opjg ''3 926503 0010 - - - >126503 N _c: C. 928riO3 = = f.. 9�563' � U.,M40 w 9 . 00203 „ 0020 v S 336TH ST 1 2os, 202104 9070 w RECEIVED 9089 Legend MAR 12 ZOOS King County Tax Lots CITY OF _; Parcel 7681900010 CITY OF FED AL Federal Way 1 t' Parcels within 300'ofparcel 7681900010 0 50 100 S T1ys map is kdended fa use as a graphical represe�talion oMy. ., _ Feet The C8y of Federal Way makes iw wawa*as to 6s accuracy. ` CITY OF CI HALL Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 (253)835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.corn September 11, 2008 Feather Billings Jon Graves Architects 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D Tacoma, WA 98402 RE: File#08-101215-00-UP; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED Cedars Redesign,33430 136 Place South Dear Ms. Billings: On March 12,2008, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services received your Use Process III application and State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)Checklist to construct a new 3-story, 18,288 sqft commercial building with retail on the first floor and office space on the upper floors. The project also includes related site improvements.The application was determined complete as of April 10, 2008. TECHNICAL REVIEW A technical review of your June 26, 2008,resubmittal for your Land Use Process III and SEPA Checklist has been completed. Please see the following comments from each department regarding your project. Planning, David Lee(253-835-2622,david.lee@cityoffederalway.com) 1. Twenty-two (22)square feet of interior lot landscaping per parking space must be provided for parking lots with 50 or more stalls in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1567(b)(1)(a)(I), or 1,386 square feet for 63 parking stalls. The plans resubmitted on June 26, 2008, do not specify which areas were calculated for parking landscaping purposes. I have included a redlined site plan showing which areas would be considered parking lot landscaping(any areas adjacent to vehicular circulation areas not including required buffer landscaping). As a reminder, landscape islands shall be a minimum size of 64 square feet and a maximum of 305 square feet, and a minimum width of six feet at the narrowest point for islands at the end of 90 degree parking rows. 2. Please specify the materials and colors used for the pedestrian connection. Per FWCC Section 22- 1634(d)(2), pedestrian pathways shall be delineated by a separate paved route using a variation in paved texture and color(may include stone,brick, or granite pavers,exposed aggregate, stamped/colored concrete). Lakehaven Utility District, Brian Asbury(253-941-1516, brian.asbury@lakehaven.org) Applicant will need to submit an application to Lakehaven for a Developer Pre-Design Meeting for Lakehaven to formally commence the water plan review process required for the proposed relocation of an existing fire hydrant. Lakehaven emphasizes that owners/developers/applicants need to apply Ms. Billings September 11, 2008 Page 2 separately to Lakehaven for the noted process, and such application should be made early in the pre- design/planning phase to avoid delays in the overall development process. Further detail and/or design guidance and requirements regarding water distribution facilities will be provided only after the owner/developer/applicant has submitted the appropriate application to Lakehaven. CLOSING Your project is now on hold until we receive the information requested.With your resubmittal,please provide five copies of a response letter that addresses each issue listed. Please provide six sets of revised plans. For all other materials,please provide two copies. Please use the enclosed resubmittal form. You must resubmit your application materials within 180 days or your project will be deemed expired per FWCC Section 22-35. If you should have any questions you may contact me at 253-835-2622 or daoid.lee@cityoffederalway.com. I look forward to continue working with you on this project. Sincerely, avid Lee Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form Redlined Landscaping Plan c: Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Ann Dower,Engineering Plans Reviewer Soma Chattopadhyay,Traffic Analyst 08-101215 Doc.I.D.46938 4 7 • Ah6, CITY OF CITY HALL Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 (253)835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.corn May 21,2008 Feather Billings Jon Graves Architects 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D Tacoma,WA 98402 RE: File#08-101215-00-UP; CEDARS REDESIGN 33430 13th Place South,Federal Way Dear Ms.Billings: On March 12,2008,the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services received your Use Process III application and State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)Checklist to construct a new 3-story, 18,288 sqft commercial building with retail on the first floor and office space on the upper floors.The project also includes related site improvements.Pursuant to the development application submittal requirements, the application was determined complete on April 3, 2008,and a Notice of Application was posted on April 12, 2008.The comment period ended April 28, 2008,with no public comments received. PRELIMINARY REVIEW A preliminary review of your Land Use Process III and SEPA Checklist has been completed.Please see the following comments from each department regarding your project. Planning,David Lee(253-835-2622,david.lee@cityoffederalway.com) 1. The site plan shows an extensive use of retaining walls along the perimeter lot lines(predominantly along the north,east,and south). Please provide an elevation drawing of these retaining walls. Additionally,please show the retaining wall on the landscaping plan showing how it will be integrated with the required Type III perimeter landscaping.Additionally,per FWCC Section 22- 1133(6),rockeries/retaining walls may only be within required yards(5' from property line)if the rockery/retaining wall is not being used as a direct structural support for a major improvement and it is reasonably necessary to provide support to a cut or slope.Rockeries/walls used to support fill are not permitted within setback areas. Otherwise,the rockery/retaining wall must have a 5' setback from perimeter lot lines. 2. A 40' ingress/egress and utilities easement lies along the northern property line.Please provide a copy of the ingress/egress/utility easement and verify(with written documentation from the beneficiary)that the proposed landscaping and associated improvements may exist in perpetuity within that easement. 3. Twenty-two(22)square feet of interior lot landscaping per parking space must be provided for parking lots with 50 or more stalls in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1567(b)(1)(a)(I), or 1,386 Ms.Billings May 21,2008 Page 2 square feet for 63 parking stalls. At current calculation, 831 square feet of parking lot landscaping has been provided on the plan.Please incorporate more parking lot landscaping within the site.As a reminder,landscape island shall be a minimum size of 64 square feet and a maximum of 305 square feet,and a minimum width of six feet at the narrowest point for islands at the end of 90 degree parking rows. 4. Parking areas abutting the 13th Place South right-of-way must be screened from the right-of-way with either a three-foot-tall berm installed within the perimeter landscaping, architectural features,or substantial plantings added to the landscaping in accordance with FWCC Section 1567(e)(1).Please show how this is accomplished with the proposed landscaping. 5. There is an existing stream located on the parcel directly east of the subject site. Said stream enters a culvert and travels in this culvert along the southern property line of the subject site.The site plan must clearly identify the location of the stream on and within 200 feet of the site per FWCC Chapter 22,Article XIV, `Environmentally Sensitive Areas."The site plan must also identify the required 100-foot setback from the stream. 6. Please provide another pedestrian connection to the north.Pedestrian connection should be provided between properties to establish pedestrian links to adjacent buildings,parking,pedestrian areas, and public rights-of-way. 7. Please specify the materials used for the pedestrian connection. Per FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(2), pedestrian pathways shall be delineated by a separate paved route using a variation in paved texture and color(may include stone,brick,or granite pavers,exposed aggregate, stamped/colored concrete).Paint striping on asphalt does not meet the intent of the FWCC. 8. Please show the existing grade lines on your elevation plan sheet. 9. The height of the building exceeds 35' above average building elevation.If approved by the Director of Community Development,the height of the structure may exceed 35' above average building elevation to a maximum of 55' above average building elevation per FWCC Section 22-751,note 1. However,the following criteria must be met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the structural,equipment,or operational needs of the use conducted in the building, and/or all ground floor spaces have a minimum floor-to-ceiling height of 13' and a minimum depth of 15'. b. Height over 35' is set back from nonresidential zones by one foot for each foot of height over 35'. c. Roof lines are designed to avoid a predominantly flat and featureless appearance through variations in roof height, forms, angles, and materials. As shown on the site plan,the building meets criteria#2.The applicant must show the need for the additional height as stipulated on Criteria#1,and also redesign the roof line to avoid the flat appearance of the roof(i.e.,the use of parapets,cornices,etc.).It may be advisable that the applicant use this opportunity to address future mechanical unit screening that will be required if rooftop mechanical units are to be added(i.e.,the elevation plan already shows HVAC exhaust caps which will need to be screened). 08-101215 Doc.I .45422 4 Ms.Billings May 21,2008 Page 3 10. Please screen the rooftop mechanical units.Per FWCC Section 22-960,rooftop appurtenances that extend above the roofline must be surrounded by a solid sight-obscuring screen that meets the following criteria: a. The screen must be integrated into the architecture of the building. b. The screen must obscure the view of the appurtenances from adjacent streets and properties. 11. Incorporate foundation landscaping on the north elevation where the veneer cultured stone system does not cover. PW Development Services,Ann Dower(253-835-2732,ann.dower@cityoffederalway.com) The information provided on March 12,2008,has been reviewed.Please have the applicant make the following revisions: Civil Drawings 1. Add a vicinity map. 2. Show existing right-of-way width, sidewalk width,and the required 1'right-of-way dedication. 3. Show conceptual streetlighting. 4. Show street trees at 2.5"caliper, 30'-40' spacing,behind the sidewalk. 5. Show dimensions for the proposed building,parking stalls,and drive aisles. 6. The proposed wet vault does not meet the requirements of the Resource Stream Protection Menu. Please consult the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual for other water quality treatment options.In addition,the City of Federal Way has approved the Stormfilter®with a pretreatment facility as a stand-alone treatment option, assuming certain conditions are met.Please contact me at 253-835-2732 if you would like additional information.Any underground facility will require approval from the Surface Water Division. TIR Although an existing flow control facility may be in place for this site, the TIR and plans do not indicate what it is or where it is located.Please include a description,location,and size of the facility,and show it on the plans if it is within the limits of the drawing. Lighting Cut Sheets These will not be acceptable for street lighting. Please see City of Federal Way Development Standards and associated details for streetlight specifications. SEPA Checklist 1. The checklist must be revised based on changes to the water quality treatment method. 2. In Item 14.d.,please note that these are private road improvements. 08-101215 Doc.I .45422 Ms.Billings May 21,2008 Page 4 PW Traffic,Soma Chattopadhyay(253-835-2745,soma.chattopadhyay@cityoffederalway.com) Site Plan 1) Please increase the driveway width on 13th Place South and ingress/egress easement at the north. Width of both the driveways should be 30 feet minimum. 2) Please show one foot ROW dedication on 13th Place South. Environmental Check List 14.f.The AWDT is 402 based on 12,262 sq ft of general office and 6,026 sq ft retail. Lakehaven Utility District,Brian Asbury(253-941-1516,brian.asbury@lakehaven.org) Applicant will need to submit an application to Lakehaven for a Developer Pre-Design Meeting for Lakehaven to formally commence the water plan review process required for the proposed relocation of an existing fire hydrant.Lakehaven emphasizes that owners/developers/applicants need to apply separately to Lakehaven for the noted process,and such application should be made early in the pre- design/planning phase to avoid delays in the overall development process.Further detail and/or design guidance and requirements regarding water distribution facilities will be provided only after the owner/developer/applicant has submitted the appropriate application to Lakehaven. CLOSING Your project is now on hold until we receive the information requested.With your resubmittal,please provide five copies of a response letter which addresses each issue listed.Please provide 6 sets of revised plans. For all other materials,please provide two copies.Please use the enclosed Resubmittal Form.You must resubmit your application materials within 180 days or your project will be deemed expired per FWCC Section 22-35. If you should have any questions you may contact me at 253-835-2622 or david.lee@cityoffederalway.com. I look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, David ee Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form c: Brian Asbury,Lakehaven Utility District Ann Dower,Engineering Plans Reviewer Soma Chattopadhyay,Traffic Analyst 08-101215 Doc.1.D.45422 It NO - ',;: iii''.. ,': :�:�;�:_ JON GRAVES ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS, PIIC .▪' :lass '',\ 31 10 RUSTON WAY, SUITE D TACOMA, WA 98402 ` �'a"'� TEL ( 253 ) 272-4214 FAX ( 253 ) 272 -4218 i' \ RESUBMITTED JGARCHS COM JUN 2 6 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. June 25, 2008 Job No. 0739 Mr. David Lee Planning Department City of Federal Way PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 RE: Process III application and SEPA comments from City File#08-101215-00-UP— Cedar's Re-Design 33430 13th Place South, Federal Way Dear David: Thanks for your comment letter dated May 21, 2008. The following is our response to these City comments. Please note that when applicable, the drawings have been modified and any related changes made are denoted with revision clouds and an associated delta symbol #1. Also, note that additional information has been added to the drawings, but only items that are addressed in response to the Process III application have been called out with revision clouds in the attached drawings. Furthermore, it's important to note that Sheets A3.0 and A3.1 have changed to A5.0 and A5.1 respectively. The following responses are organized in the same format as your comment letter. Planning 1. In regards to the extensive use of retaining walls along the perimeter lot lines as shown on the site plan, please see the revised Preliminary Drainage, Grading and R.O.W. Plan (Sheet 2 of 2 by ESM Consulting Engineers) that show the height of the retaining walls and the 5' setback from all perimeter lot lines. Retaining walls that are 6' or taller will be shown by structural drawings during the permit process. The updated landscaping plan on Sheet L-1 shows how the retaining walls will be integrated with the required Type III perimeter landscaping. • 2. A 40' Ingress/Egress and Utilities easement lies along the northern property line. Please see the enclosed of copy of the ingress/egress/utility easement and _ written documentation (Attachment#6) from the beneficiary that the proposed landscaping and associated improvements may exist in perpetuity within then easement. ��Qodo-� r The parking lot has been revised and now provides interior lot landscaping in ,�,Qt accordance with FWCC Section 22-1567(b)(1)(a)(I). At current calculation, 4,588 l� .er ) square feet of parking lot landscaping has been incorporated in the plan, which is well over the required 1,342 square feet. Please see the revised architectural wing Sheet A1.0 for documentation of these area calculations. 4. The parking areas abutting the 13th Place South right-of-way have now been screened from the right-of-way with the appropriate landscaping in accordance with FWCC Section 1567(e)(1). Please see how this has been accomplished with the revised landscaping plan on Sheet L1.0 — Landscape. To achieve the appropriate number of trees required by FWCC Section 1567(e)(1), we included trees in the Westerly and Southerly Utility Easements. Please note we are aware that Federal Way's Engineering Checklist#9 page 7 of 38 landscaping may not encroach onto utility easements and may require modification at the time of engineering review. 5. Please see the revised site plan on Sheet A1.0, which identifies the approximate location of the existing stream on and within 200 feet of the site per FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIV, "Environmentally Sensitive Areas," which also identifies the required 100-foot setback from the stream. ,d � c ��-1 f 6. Another pedestrian connection has been added to the north. Please see the Q o�( modified site plan on revised Sheet A1.0 which shows this. ----7 Ct 7. Materials used for the pedestrian connection were selected in accordance with FWCC Sec.22-1634(d)(2). The new pedestrian pathway is delineated by a separate paved route using a variation in paved texture and color which include stamped/colored concrete. Please see the modified site plan on revised Sheet A1.0 which shows this. 8. The elevation plan sheets have been revised to include the existing grade lines, please see revised Sheets A5.0 and A5.1. 9. In order to have the increased building height approved we have preformed the following to meet the required criteria. r 1. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the structural and mechanical equipment. As noted in item #10 below, we have increased the height of the parapets to integrate screening of the mechanical equipment into the architecture of the building. Furthermore, with the required ceiling and plenum heights, it became necessary to increase the building height to accommodate an efficient structural joist floor/roof system. 2. Height over 35' is set back from nonresidential zones by one foot for each foot of height over 35'. The property is surrounded by nonresidential zones on all sides. Our proposed height increase is 1'- 6". The maximum allowed height was calculated using the average proposed grade elevations of the corners of the building which are at heights of 328.0', 328.0', 340.0', and 340.0'. The average grade is elevation 335.00' (above sea level). With a 35 ft maximum height limit, the top of the building cannot exceed the 369.00' elevation, except as noted above. The proposed maximum elevation exceeds the base maximum by 1'-6". The proposed building is located, at its closest point, 57'-6" from the southern property line. Per the requirements allowing height increase the following calculation determines the maximum height that could be achieved, based on the location of the building per the current site design: *57'-6"- 35'-0"= 22-6"= allowed additional height increase to average building elevation. *369.00'+ 22=6"= 391.50'= maximum allowed building elevation per allowed height increase. The proposed building height shall meet this requirement, as 370.50'< 391.50'. 3. The roofline has been re-designed by increasing size and height of the parapet to differentiate the tenant wings from the core of the building. Please see Revised Sheets A5.0 and A5.1 for modifications to the building elevations that more clearly illustrate this as the design intent. 10. The rooftop mechanical units have been screened per FWCC Sec. 22-960, by raising the height of the parapets which also meets the following criteria: a. The screen is integrated into the architecture of the building. The perimeter parapet heights have been modified to more clearly illustrate this as the design intent. b. The screen obscures the view of the appurtenances from adjacent streets and properties. 11. There is not sufficient room for landscaping in this area; therefore, we have incorporated a veneer of cultured stone to the North Elevation. Please see the North Elevation on revised Sheet A5.1 for the modification. Public Works Development Services Civil Drawings 1. See revised Topographic Survey Plan (Sheet 1 of 2 by ESM Consulting Engineers), where a vicinity map has been included. 2. See revised Preliminary Drainage, Grading and R.O.W. Plan (Sheet 2 of 2 by ESM Consulting Engineers), where the existing right-of-way, sidewalk width, and the required 1' right-of-way dedication have been included. 3. See the revised Preliminary Drainage, Grading and R.O.W. Plan (Sheet 2 of 2 by ESM Consulting Engineers), where a conceptual street lighting design has been shown. Furthermore, see the Sheet E1.0 — Site Lighting Plan for consistent information. Note that the preliminary design was designed by the Electrical Consultant at B.C.E. Engineering after coordination with City standards. 4. See the revised Preliminary Drainage, Grading and R.O.W. Plan (Sheet 2 of 2 by ESM Consulting Engineers), where street trees at 2.5 caliper, 30'- 40' spacing, behind the sidewalk have been included. Furthermore, see the Sheet L1.0 — Landscape Plan for consistent information. Note that the preliminary design was designed by the Landscape Consultant at Eagle Design after coordination with City standards. 5. See the revised Preliminary Drainage, Grading and R.O.W. Plan (Sheet 2 of 2 by ESM Consulting Engineers), where the dimensions for the proposed building, parking stalls, and drive aisles have been added. 6. The proposed wet vault stormwater system has been replaced with a StormFilter design meeting the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by blanket adjustments. Please see the revised Technical Information Report (T.I.R.)for related changes. • - TIR See the revised Technical Information Report (T.I.R.) for information regarding the existing flow control facility and related information in the TIR. The location of this systems has been located on both the Topographic Survey Plan (Sheet 1 of 2) and the Preliminary Drainage, Grading and R.O.W. Plan (Sheet 2 of 2) by ESM Consulting Engineers. Per Ann Dower, Street Lighting Cut Sheets will not be necessary for Land Use submittal and will be provided at time of engineering review. Public Works, Traffic 1. Per Soma Chattopadhyay, the driveway along the ingress/egress easement and curb cut into the site from the easement are acceptable at 24-foot width. 2. See revised Preliminary Drainage, Grading and R.O.W. Plan (Sheet 2 of 2 by ESM Consulting Engineers), where the required 1' right-of-way dedication has been included. Lakehaven Utility District An application for a Developer Pre-Design Meeting has been made to the district. Respectfully, 70f Brett Lindsay Attachments: Please substitute out the following sheets with those initially provide in the Process Ill application. 1. Sheet A1.0—Architectural Site Plan 2. Sheet A5.0 and A5.1 —Architectural Elevations 3. Topography Survey Plan (Sheet 1 of 2 by ESM Consulting Engineers) 4. Preliminary Drainage, Grading and R.O.W. Plan (Sheet 2 of 2 by ESM Consulting Engineers) 5. Technical Information Report 6. Ingress/Egress/Utility Easement Information 7. Sheet L1.0— Landscape Plan 8. Sheet E1.0—Site Lighting Plan 9. Sheet E2.0—Photometric Plan 10. Revised SEPA JON GRAVES ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS, PLLC 3110 RUSTON WAY, SUITE D TRCOMR, WA 98402 TEL (253) 272-4214 FAX (253) 272-4218 f IESUBMITTED JUN 2 6 2008 ` DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF ' 1. n.• ': Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Fe d e ra I Way 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. *`Please note: Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. ** Project Number: v 1 2 5 - C C - it P Project Name: C. C c C�_v S f 2C S( c_j rti Project Address: J t 3( .3 t►^ P/CL CL_ S : j` GCE ye-ck' WC-0- Project Contact: P I`- Li hct Sci Phone: (2 5 ) 2 7 2 —4 2-( RESUBMITTED ITEMS: #of Copies** Detailed Description of Item R('S l��j'Y Li Heil) �-(.s r't 5 c_ L '`+h Y kt..{-c Ax- i1 c -6_ P i C' v- v 1 k V vet-i-i c'•Y\. j (D ec0, A.Fhi) S Vf. (C.) l r cu.►�ct c ) �r c -& c 12 C t;J **Always submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application.** Resubmittal Requested by : Letter Dated: (Staff Member) OFFICE USE ONLY RESUB#: / Distribution Date: l0 v��o By: W„ Dept/Div Name # Description Branding LZF'lanning PW Fire Other Bulletin#129-August 8,2006 Page 1 of Q k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information RESUBMITTED 2 6 2°°U DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES JUN 33325 8t Avenue South CITY OFr. PO Box 9718 ITY OF FEDERAL w Y Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Wag BUILDING 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. **Please note: Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. ** Project Number: 0 g - 1 1) 1 2- I 5 - 0 D - (.l. P Project Name: C 'GCa_ r 5 '‘. -P Project Address: 0 7-T 77 03 6't CL S - FeC�-(� 1, 4 VQCO- Project Contact: rLe I I L1 t,1C Sck Phone: 25 3 27 2— ZI RESUBMITTED ITEMS: #of Copies** Detailed Description of Item lrlTPSS , t e UtItt E-ccSew v-c7 ( �z ((i L.cl_In ,SC p e 01 Cat Yt lY ✓ie('lt1CAA t Ict� �P SI-2 `�[c�l �l✓� act to Pho-60 vtL _JP/CL l2 (i' R€ vsiece 5EPt+ **Always submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application.** Resubmittal Requested by : Letter Dated: (Staff Member) OFFICE USE ONLY RESUB#: Distribution Date: By: Dept/Div Name # Description Building Planning PW Fire Other Bulletin#129—August 8,2006 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information • • SECOMA BUSINESS PARK • A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 1 21 N.,R.4 E,W.M. I 1 3-37 7, T, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON - LEGAL. DESCRIPTION APPROVALS THAT PORTION OF THE SE i/4 OF SECTION 17,T. 21 N., R. 4 E.,W.M.,KING COUNTY;;WASHINGTON„.MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING&COMMUNITY'DEVELOPMENT COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH1/4.CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17; EXAMINED and approved this,,Olv`day of"ihrfQeli i THENCE S.88 44 55 E,1312.58 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION y_ TO.THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE.SEY45EY4 OF SECTION 17; R,BUILDING AND LANDADEVELOPMENT DIVISION THENCE N 01°11'55° E.340.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SE 1/4 SE Y4 ANO ' THE EAST LINE OF THE-PLAT OF WEST CAMPUS BUSINESS AND OFFICE PARK RECORDED KING COUNTY COUNCIL - IN VOLUME 96, PAGES.50-53 OF PLATS,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON. y " 7p THE 7RUC Po/NT OF 6EGINN/NG; EXAMINED roved th .2L day of rZe,..S.-197L THENCE CONTINUING N 01°11'55" E,477.76 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE SEFi SE OU AND SAID EAST LINE OF SAID PLAT TO THE SOr/TH LINE OF THE NORTH n0 FEET _ , 7f �/ S- .. DEPUT 5OF EY4 S SOUTH A./4 SAID SAW LINE E OF THE SETA; ODFj T�IHEµ-Cy/�/d! ' THENCE S 88 44'30"E. 964.34-FEET ALONG EA/O$0UTf/LINE 70 A Po/NTON A LINE 95o..00 FEET WEST AMAN. K I CLERK WNCIL OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST.LINE OF S.ID SE 1/45E4; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS .'THENCE S O1°19'20"W,362:64 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE; EXAMINED and approved this 2Ho day of Nov. 1979 THENCE'S-88°44'55 E.20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE-330.00 FEET WEST . OF'AND PARACLEL.TOTHE EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 SE'/4; THENCE S O1°19'20"'14,115.00 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A POINT Ae• ON A LINE 340.00 FEET.NORTH OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION dout.rTY-¢ono ENGINEER. 17,AND:THE NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK,DIVISION 4, DEPARTMENT. OF ASSESSMENTS RECORDED'IN'VOLUME 101 OF PLATS, PAGES 34-35, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ;s--; EXAMINED and approved this 2-L7 day of"Jo./. 197 9 THENCE N 88 44 55:W, 983:31 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE AND SAID NORTH LINE OF SA PLAT TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. �/ 1� J/'''PPE 0� vVL CONTAINING 10.62.ACRES.:MORE OR LESS. �IASSESSOR DEPUIY,KING COUNTY ASSESSOR RECORDING CERTIFICATE No. 7911270758 - - Filed for record at the request of the King County Council this 27'dqy of 'SURVEYORS--CERTIFICATE • N„v ,1979 ,at 32 minutes past J�Q Nand recorded in volume 1/3 of plats,page 37-40 : records of King County.Washington. DIVISION OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS BASED UPON A SURVEY OF SECTION 17,T. 21 N., R. 4E., p y t1,r C. i L 1f 0• J A N E S S. W L E[S W.M.,THAT ALL COURSES AND DISTANCES ME SHOWN CORRECTLY THEREON,THAT ALL MONUMENTS AND MRNKGER SUPERINTENDENT S.OF RECORDS CORNERS WILL BE SET CORRECTLY ON THE GROUND,AND THAT I HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH THE aY AfeZO PROVISIONS OF THE STATUTES AND.;PLATTING'REGULATIONS. 0.11 D.se DEDICATION T::'Q9Pi,7 N ru/ii KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,THAT WE,THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS IN FEE SIMPLE • OF THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED.HEREBY DECLARE THIS PLAT,AND DEDICATE TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER ALL STREETS AND AVENUES SHOWN HEREON,AND THE USE y THEREOF FOR ALL PUBLIC PURPOSES NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE USE THEREOF FOR a8RVEi PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES:ALSO THE RIGHT TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS AND FILLS UPON THE LOTS AND BLOCKS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IN THE ORIGINAL REA- SONABLE GRADING OF THE STREETS AND AVENUES SHOWN HEREON. COMPTROLLERS CERTIFICATE IN WITNESS WHEREOF,WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS. .I-HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL.PROPERTY TAXES ARE PAID,THAT THERE ARE NO DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED TO THIS OFFICE FOR COLLECTION AND THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED TO THIS - OWNER : GRAND LODGE OF FREE AND ACCEPTED MASONS,Tacoma,Washington and 'OFFICE FOR-COLLECTION ON ANY'.OF THE PROPERTY HEREINCONTAINED, THO ON F. MC Y LODGE.302. Federal Way,Washington. ' DEDICATED'AS STREETS ALLEYS OR FOR OTHER PUBLIC USE,ARE.EAID IN yyOr�,/7/ Fl;LI. Ed 4i8ennel ,PC Secretory THIS. ' .15T DAY OF -4101,0448 SR , 1971. /f, `All I-I-1 km L. PARSQITS >.f/i..f�0. ,/..ti---- John 99,oy/tte `' �/. Ellen Yette •KING COUNTY COMPTROLLER: ,; 7 r,`EPUTY COMP LLER ">�'+J'- _ -' s"'Y�." �'6�lNna ' Ton vI Loreto / n Vera Di Loreto —47-r.,� ')JiitPi /`jFrr/ RESTRICTIONS , y �5=ere /L,. Neison�� Ter'q Nelson / "„—Ao rf f gym' d .//f o7�ehz ' -' '•" nal ellstro `i Judy Hellstrom NO LOT OR PORTION'OF.A LOT IN THIS PLAT SHALL BE DIVIDED AND SOLD OR RESOLD OR OWNERSHIP THIS PLAT OR TRANSFERRED WHEREBY OWNERSHIP OF RES[1BM�TT ANY PORTION NFSHIP CHAN.EDIIOR BE LESS THAN THE AREAREQUIREDT FOR "` . I. Houck Florence Houck THE USE;DISTRICT'IN WHICH,LOCATED. 7y) Fred 19cBa5n ��J `nA,' Barbara McBain ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (CONTINUED) JUN 2 6 2008 �`)'"G 1''''" ``',: l'�tl,�`„.�. ` , STATE'CIF W OW4 p(cON , We Cat er a L. Weiks COUNTY OFIMGPIEReg ss 11T _ �•i- . , is IS TO CERTIFY TIi{1T ON THIS _DAY OF Fk-8Ru¢Rr IB7.1^, F R ` iso ��R.( I _a 'I , 'RAF FF FRA ,Anthon Lasso NNW- , THE IINDERSIGNED;A NOTARY PUBLIC,PERSONALLYNOWAPPEARED 01-.14cD R.EeH' V A i , AND - INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO ME TO BErATION^-� ✓$�L ,�}E,� �E- r�� _ - t[_1- • 1 r .r rl ',EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION,AND WHO r V N nda Kuecker Patric ec er ACKNQWLEDG b TO ME-THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT ��pg-_ J AND Dix)O SAID.INDIVIDUALS FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. "-0„ TJ ��i+'—Cn ey , Vi rgfnia Smiley /'- • WITNEOSNY HAN,I AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. /. . c is Project NO./-z33-00/-7B/ fiEATTLJE/REDO/LAN VEGAS � ��THE SHEETLof 4, u � a"Mway.Ep"OYve ... NOTARY PUBLIC IN WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT ANTE OF \. FEDERAL MN.sImnWASIO IroN . ENGINEEREIPLAMNERS , TELEPHONE(aMIlatL2111 1Z.n0 TIE-II .S5�9D/) 21G_—Ii • SECOMA 'BUSINESS PARK - I I 3-38 A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION I'l, 12IN,R.4E,W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • STATE OF.WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF a5 ,.• as KING ) `. COUNTY OF KING ) THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS I3—DAY OF DEc BER -1972. BEFORE ME,. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS ..-?DAY OF DE�EMESE . 1971',BEFORE ME. THE;UNDERSIGNED;A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED-nav y Dr LORE77> THE UNDERSIGNED.A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED -Few M°M4„J 'AND.'11.aE;q:'Dr t•ORETO INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO ME TO BE 1 AND ¢gA6heA M.F+a„J . INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO M iU •L EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION,AND.WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION,AND WHO ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF. ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID:.INDIVIDUALS FOR THE-USES-AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. SAID INDIVIDUALS FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. - WITNESS.mt.HiNr4tid.OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. 54 (, ap , .'��, � R ~~ -� L 1 _ • OTARY PUBLIC III D FOR THE S TE . NOT Y UBLIC IN ' FOR TH STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT7EQ#L.IAlA+1 WASHINGTON, RESIDING ATFrc_uc WrW. STATE'OF WASHINGTON' ) .. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • COUNTY OF.KING ' � ss,' COUNTY OF KING ) ss THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS rS a/DAY OF E -1 c, z,1971, BEFORE ME, THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS 7r'DAY OFi)ND-18ea .197Y, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED',A NOTARY PUBLIC7ENSONALLY APPEARED 66fn/$oyETr� THE UNDERSIGNED,A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED GA,26,E D. wc,KS AND , LIE-AI.$ec -T-E INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO ME TO BE AND eankEt,NE L. IJa<, 5. INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO ME.TO BE EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION,AND WHO - EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION,AND WHO ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF _ ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID-INDIVIDUALS FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. SAID INDIVIDUALS FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY'BAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. r _ A r� yy4,,� ..... ' RY PA UBLIC IN AND FOR THE S ATE OF FNOTARY PUBLIC IN FOR THE STATE OF L� A / - • WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT ,i ��pgtgC_Glau WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT.f�ia, yJ� • 'STATE OF'WASHINGTON ' ).' T STATE OF WASHINGTON ) - ss ss GOUNTY:OF.KING.,• _ _ . COUNTY OF KING THIS IS-TO CERTIFY.THAT SON THIS 15 DAY OF D�CE�i f 6E/C 197 B, BEFORE ME, THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS f5m'DAY OF J A•NuA"' 197 , BEFORE ME; THE UNDERSIGNEQr A.NOTARY PUBLIC, ERSONALLY APPEARED .r>entE.u7 r' THE UNDERSIGNED,A NOTARY PUBLIC,PERSONALLY ),,A041., ft:L.,erKAgt AND .1. gbliFTTW , INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO ME TO BE - AND1,r&,eia I4tE4Ckl . INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO 0 BE - EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION,AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION,AND WHO ACKNOWLEDGED TO:ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND''DEED OF ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF . SAID INDIVIDUALS FOR-THE USES.AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. SAID INDIVIDUALS FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS AY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. WITNESS NY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. ARY P IC I� •D FOR TH STATE OF NO �•Y P18LIC,IN AND FO-d T STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT'�eSXXmt Wqr WASHINGTON,IIESIDIN6 AT _pcCAL Wky. • STATE OF WASIYINGTGN )' - STATE OF WASHINGTON ' ss f ss COUNTY:OF KING COUNTY OF KING - THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT'"ON THIS �1' 'DAY OF 5 YT 197 S, BEFORE ME, THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS f 'DAY OF Q s�q�, 197 ',BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED A'.NOTARY PUBLIC,PERSONALLY E ED -Co —L.. 7g¢O_Fi NRE N& THE UNDERSIGNED.A NOTARY PUBLIC,PEIRSONALLY R E RE 1 Ba dE/ ,STm/is/gar. ANDAwj7(W.tq'. 'u _L*SSo. ' . INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO ME TO BE ANDS {;a//SeiZnM , INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO ME 0 EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION,AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION,AND WHO 1; ':ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID-INDIVIDUALS'FOR.THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. SAID INDIVIDUALS FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. a. WITNESS MY HAND,AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN.' WITNESS NY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. I�. I as • L5 T X' Q,y,r,, 4 Y�/�, 1 NOTARY L II FOR TH TA E(��QQF- NOTARY N RESIDING AT TIJE S TE OF ▪ ` 'WASHINGTON,RESIDING ATI. 21 0 WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT.,FCG STATE OF WASIINGTON ss ' . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY'OF KING - .' ) ' COUNTY OF KING ) r THIS:IS TO CERTIFY TWAT ON THIS Jq DAY OF ID-E mr,Eg 197%, BEFORE ME, THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS 2/ OF ,e00nn 197/, BEFORE ME, THE,UNDERSIGNED,A NOTARY PUBLIC. PERSONALLY APPEARED L. .f -fov K THE UNDERSIGNED,A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED Le , .S'n,i/,•r AND,'cLG1,veE/fou[K INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO Mr-TO BE AND v' ;./;.- ,'•,.;J,., INDIVIDUALS KNOWN TO ME TO BE EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION.AND WHO r� EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION,AND,WHO ACKNOWLEDGED;TO ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF' ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND.DEED OF • SAID.INDIVIDUALS FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. SAID INDIVIDUALS FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES.THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND.OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN t' } l3� fY/ /Gj��,. ATE OF • • r 1-5 , - IVO-SY6 GBZTCZA R f E STA Ef_t F R 4B(IC Id FOR T l ST `• . WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT'f£pELAL WAy. WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT Ile a',V•mi'K• - Project No./2 733-AO/- I SHEET?of¢ BEATTIE/RENa/LAN VEGAS ♦J ,a s1l aaaNIN AVENUE seam PIMA&WAY.WAiWMITON • - . • ENGINEERS/PLANNERS TELEPHONE(XE)mutt_ • . • T 1IA C�s'�'®z, 21G-IIA • SECOMA BUSINESS PARK _39 A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 17, T,2I N.,R.4 E.,W,M. I I 3 • • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON "�. DEDICATION - - SIN/TART SEWER EASEMENT - .. AN EASEMENT/5 HERESY RESERVED RJR AND GRANTED 70 UREHAVEN SEWER KNOW ALL MEN BY.THESE PRESENTS.THAT WE,'THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LAND DISTRICT UNDER AND UPON THE EASEMENTS SNOWN ON THIS PLAT AND DEscR/BED HEREBY.PLATTED,'HEREBY.DECLARE.THIS PLAT,AND DEDICATE TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER HEREIN RJR 'UT/LIT/ES'AND "SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS'70 INSTALL, ALL STREETS AND AVENUES SHOWN HEREON,AND THE USE THEREOF FOR ALL PUBLIC PURPOSES NOT MAINTAIN,REPLACE,REPAIR AND OPERATE SANITARY SEWER MAINS AND ' INCONSISTENT WITH THE USE THEREOF FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES:ALSO THE RIGHT TO-MAKE APPURTENANCES FOR THIS Spa-D/V/S/ON ANO OTHER PROPERTY 70GETHER ALL NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS AND FILLS UPON THE LOTS AND BLOCKS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WITH THE RIGHT 7a ENTER UPON 541D EASEMENTS AT ALL TIMES FUR THE IN THE ORIGINAL REASONABLE GRADING OF THE STREETS AND AVENUES SHOWN HEREON. PURPOSES STATED.STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED UPON ANY AREA RESERVED FOR EASEMENT. - IN WITNESS.WHEREOF.WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS. • • • • • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS STATE OF-WASHINGTON ' • ) 'COUNTY OF KING-• ) SS. /� p THIS IS TO CERTIFY.THAT ON THIS /0 DAY OF +-1•" , 19779, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED,A NOTARY PUBLIC, 0NpL A EAR D :INDIVIDUALEXNOWN TO If TO BE THE .lii '.7X,(4Ye •m<O,,5' a EXECUTED THE/FORE ING DEDICATION, AND WHO ACIMDWLEDGEDTOMETHESAIDINSTRIMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF.SAID INDIVIDUAL,FOR THE.USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS"IXAHAND,i)OFFICIAL SEAL.THE•DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. �12)411¢, ��'�/n�� Uo�,O;ARy 9mN \� HM N ICE.f vi � RY PUBLIC I NO OR THE STATE OF •$JY'9.o"'U. G mBLI t11 • WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT{aka//i) • STATE TIF'-WAAIVtGTOR - ) • COUNTY;OFKING ••) SS. • THIS I5-TO&`CERTIFY-THAT ON THIS 1041DAY OF Octobar , 1979 , BEFORE ME. THE UNDERSIGNE.D,'A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED Gout F Harrinote INDIVIDUAL..KNOWN TOME-TO BE THE •ndD1yid aII dmriyhod her¢In and AHnrYfey in r 40r . rin04mt who EXELUUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION, AND-WHO • DO"c'LHaY.5 MENT TO BE THE.FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID INDIVIDUALAFOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. And al the free and vokudary eet and dead of atornry infaet For ae alma id -WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL,SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN.Darif L. arrIn 0`�PJ• ��1�+M otd II •d0`J ss... °Ot-• nor Incompetent ‘,oT'Q.riy 9m `' ND Y PUBLI IN N 0 TATE OF :o-, WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT.>LiA,.ICtJO.y �v `OUBL\G�f�,1V O • STAT;401iiii$TQfrY�`9 ) COUNTY OF KING _ ) SS. THIS IS.TO CERTIFY.TNAT-ON THIS DAY OF , 197_, BEFORE ME, THE.UNDERSIGNEOI.A.NOTARY PUBLIC PERSONALLY APPEARED INDIVIDUAL KNOWN:TO,ME TO BE THE - - - EXECUTED THE FOREGOING DEDICATION.AND WHO ACKNOWLEDGED.TO ME THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED 'OF SAID INDIVIDUAL-FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY-.HAND'AND.OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. • • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. RESIDING AT • • • • Project No/-253-40/'78/ SHEET Sot 4 0 I 'T. SEATTLE/RENO/LAS VEOAS a •. I r a a mu MOM AVENUE fount NEO5YL WAY.WAPoNO7ON • ENGINEERS/PLANNERS TELEPHONE 120N EIS-2111 • 7,(6- (,r9o3-) 216-IIB z• • SECOMA BUSINESS PARK l 13-40 A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 17, T.21 N.,R.4 E.,W.M. - KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ^ • LEGEND, .. SECTION SUBDIVISION-QUADRANT ENGINEERS 0 SET STANDARD KING COUNTY MON.8 CASE BASIS OF BEARING- K.C.A.S. G STEPAN 8 ASSOC.TO SET MON. 8 CASE • SET 5/8"REBAR 8 CAP L.S. 10618 Ie FOUND f1PeSs!AP SET LEAD PLUG 8 TACK AT THE INTERSECTION \SORFACE MONUMENT OF THE CURB AND THE PROJECTION OF THE SIDE LOT ‘ -', � LINE 11 SCALE I =I00 ----N 88.44W'W cae. -,.. \,30' 301 I I I I 8211*Efhci{,iNwy.S. a I . I N I T „ ='hor-1-Nor Z 8131 • A.FR730,080:,6 . I _+-` --- kl 321 32 1 t ' W I 1FpLR�� ,I1\ I I Mla I .TEO I I - - ° I ::NP'"� , I W C y 1 N88'44'/4"w(2) °2 ie.,.fn n lot tower*,I.aesnrt d1,+1 .No • • N88'44.30'W /(- 3e ay,I 9h3i It sz0cl0 , 3:(P) 235.47' i9 I 24440' • - N8B'44'30'w 90938'>t' I 32' 371 I iti 1 ` - -4.S-25Ufi/i/y east 1 04 ;.I 6 W 1 1 ro"Sa„fAvyeam*. W *K * W o!!°' m n 5 Ct 4 4 3 % w as Q'N N I`3�, • N FE UE1j- 3 • .- ^ 18 N2 w M 2 C h �a'grgrcss,Tres P !3 40/n ess egress '= !n fT _r tiro es es Y. _ �ti_/15,1 r 9r 9 f`aN/'flea ea,»r. • W V e U j �` '� 11 AF.77/0260535 I .j- N. NBB 4•R35"N' 23573`---"/ + 223.4a"-(R)-+ReOOrd \4 O' N. R A�°�fi'5S"i(r-___ I :U zU I 1, 24443' d/BB_44JriS_'W- 011. �p f-- --+1 , R,R+__2Q7A0' _ N884455"W •Ng *e ,1` A.F.N77042/0/53 k -WI :I I _ T/0'Sanrfa,emit.A.EIE75O707O5AO�eThata„e%:% ,I --- J --r EU 814 y1. 2 3S'e 07 hh y / y �.,W If% `O • / IQ y '' 300.L17•(R) r� 2 m w Ia'sEr,:,trr a.n't—i N�'44'SS'W afa./e'r 3 • a .-�1 /awkr•amt a N 2 (A.Fx77o oaa745)' Ws z5o.r5•�r 2w.7crKe) 5•Sanito Sewer esnf. ` c k 32' 37} n N88W41O5� pNpN 33am' sW� 1 _ 5'SYor O A eanP j�/OW I. a'afarq D,vn Lam% • I T8 -. •`*I 1*. rime1.` I /S' t-y r 23?.7!'_— IC:I�''-"-lmgY_'- . 1 -. a `•'/ %R)�,`11 y r T 1 - 1M- •:_` 2A747 I t NB9.44:%'"W '� `f .� • NA9 44:55_W P�44'J� ,y 33/'11' 245.Oa' /99.79• ' 383.29YR, ' 'All: 9.43. 330.00' VI EST CAMPUS `OFFICE ll: LJ/V 4 r I43•fnn Iot turner AM Lap earn*. S 3 • ggg • I o m I L ^MONUMENT:.'.. I h mCs 1 I /3/258 C H / ,/ i7 507.43' - 1 - // L ey- .' �E S.334.37REET -^-X1 N BB'44'S5"W /3/2.SB' • NOTES vee'44'55"W zozs.f6'- /120'toEE.pstR y.$ '/.REVIEWANO:/N)PLEMENTAT/ON OF THE P-SUFF/K"REQU/BEMEN75.SHALL OCCUR PRIMARILY AT THE TIME (BRASS CAP SU,QFACEMONUMENT OF 41UILDiA .PERMIT ISSUANCE. /N ORDER 7a ACCOMODATE 77//S, EACH LOT SHALL BE DESIGNED IN TOTAL AND A SITE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE TOTAL LOT AT THE TIME OF THE BUILDING ' . .'PERMIT APPLICATION,PROVIDED THAT CONSTRUCTION MAY BE DONE IN PHASES THE SITE PLAN SHALL 'BE INCLUDED 4'/771 ANY PERMIT REal/EST AND SHALL REFER 70 BUILDINGS,LANDSCAPING,PARKING • AND.CIRCULATION. Project No./-235-CO/-78/ SHEET�'of 4' 2. THE STORM WATER RETENTION/DETENTION FAUL/T/ES MAINTENANCE /5 TO BE BORN EQUALLY BY ALL LOT OWNERS. • I) I r SEATTLE/RENO/LAS VEOAS 1 r a S 9E11 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY.WASHINGTON y/7e ca0 - ENGINEERS/PLANNERS �_ _ TELEPHONE 1�1 S3E4111 - ZLL-"cr<Q-:uy 16-IIC MEMORANDUM CITY OF MPI"."1411ftw.re Federal WayCommunity Development Services Department DATE: September 29, 2008 TO: Ann Dower—Engineering Plans Reviewer Soma Chattopadhyay—Traffic Analyst Scott Sproul—Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury—Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham—South King County Fire &Rescue FROM: David Lee SUBJECT: CEDARS REDESIGN—Resubmittal—(08-101215-00-UP) 33430 13TH PL S Please find attached resubmittal materials for Cedars Redesign: • Response Letter with Stamped Concrete Spec. • Architectural Site Plan • Civil Site Plan • Civil Grading Plan • Landscape Plan • Irrigation Plan • Site Electrical Plan (E1.0) • Point by Point Calculations (E2.0, E3.0, E4.0) Thanks DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h_41110k �ESUBnn Avenue South "' M�TT'Ep PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 SEP 2 6 2005 Federal Way253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. **Please note: Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. ** Project Number: OS - 1 0 I 2- I S _ 0 O _J . 2 Project Name: Ci kCIQv S R{iG c i Project Address: 33'g0 13�'` f 1Gi.CP Dovt TI h-hd r f tUEL j Project Contact: B y -1-1- 11(ic ct 1--1 Phone: (2-5-2) '2.- 7 2 --4211-1-' RESUBMITTED ITEMS: #of Copies ** Detailed Description of Item 5 R.€ pot\s e Le�-}-R-v- . \,v S-4urn Fed. C c;Y1c V-Or( S Ewe C., (o Phf du-It.c-f LV-I S1 Icy v-- (0 CA„, CA-e ?la_ LW<< (-7v-etc-CI-vx {E I u-w L2 La ve&cc&p Q .�CI v\-- u \ vv'‘e114., 1 cA -Iu v� **A/ways submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application.** Resubmittal Requested by : bet v(cC l_:e OArtunc etter Dated: ci I /1 / L�' (Staff Member) I OFFICE USE ONkir (7 RESUB#: g Distribution Date: By: ez Dept/Div Name # Description Building Planning ,- Dfcto PW �p �� Fire Other --� Bulletin#129—August 8,2006 Page 1 oft. k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES E8 BA i-rr 33325 8`h Avenue South '►�1 E PO Box 9718 CITY OF SEP 2 G D Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal WayCITY N 2008 253-835 2607;Fax 253-835-2609 C/ www.cityoffederalway.com BUI D/NG DR P WAY T. RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. **Please note: Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. ** Project Number: -iL - _4_ (; /), rj - 0 0 _ u P Project Name: COCkek-U"S Project Address: 9( l GL C SG�-fig Project Contact: V-ef L- ii d cc Phone: 7� 2 2 I RESUBMITTED ITEMS: U #of Copies ** Detailed Description of Item v 51EIefv1 � I� (� (t , v i . Po Fo -h f CccQcu_Qa_i (b?. , c) tt l� ( . o) **Always submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application.** Resubmittal Requested by : LAG( v �(� L_ Letter Dated: 1 / II l (Staffember) OFF/CE USE ONLY .RESUEB#: Distribution Date: o y; Dept/Div Name # Description Building Planning PW Fire Other Bulletin#129—August 8,2006 Page la 2. k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information Map Date:October 27,2006 Cit• y of City v Federal Way Resident Mailir GisDiision P.O.Box 9718 33325 8th Ave S. Federal Way Notification Area Federal Way Wa.98063 (206)-835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com 172104 9035 172104 172104 9059 172104 172104 9031 9138 9049 172104 9100 172104 9033 172104 9064 926501 11 0050 172104 9020 172104 9122 926501 172104 0040 9026 768190 0040 768190 768190 0060 0050 768190 0030 926501 0030 768190 0045 172104 9047 y/ 768190 0070 768190 0020 172104 9112 (. 926503 9 926501 0053 00353 926503 0010 0010 926503 0055 926503 CL 0030 1 926503 = 926503 0050 0040 926503 0020 n. S 336TH ST 202104 9070 202104 RECEIVED 9069 Legend MAR 1 2 2008 King County Tax Lots CITY OF Parcel 7681900010 CITY OF 'ODE AL Federal Way 1 Parcels within 300'of parcel 7681900010 0 50 100 200eet This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. J U ` CITY OF CITY HALL Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 (253)835-7000 www.cityoffederalwa y.corn September 11,2008 Feather Billings Jon Graves Architects 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D Tacoma, WA 98402 RE: File#08-101215-00-UP; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED Cedars Redesign,33430 13th Place South Dear Ms. Billings: On March 12, 2008, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services received your Use Process III application and State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) Checklist to construct a new 3-story, 18,288 sqft commercial building with retail on the first floor and office space on the upper floors.The project also includes related site improvements. The application was determined complete as of April 10, 2008. TECHNICAL REVIEW A technical review of your June 26, 2008, resubmittal for your Land Use Process III and SEPA Checklist has been completed. Please see the following comments from each department regarding your project. Planning,David Lee(253-835-2622,david.lee@cityoffederalway.com) 1. Twenty-two(22)square feet of interior lot landscaping per parking space must be provided for parking lots with 50 or more stalls in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1567(b)(1)(a)(I), or 1,386 square feet for 63 parking stalls. The plans resubmitted on June 26, 2008,do not specify which areas were calculated for parking landscaping purposes. I have included a redlined site plan showing which areas would be considered parking lot landscaping(any areas adjacent to vehicular circulation areas not including required buffer landscaping). As a reminder, landscape islands shall be a minimum size of 64 square feet and a maximum of 305 square feet, and a minimum width of six feet at the narrowest point for islands at the end of 90 degree parking rows. 2. Please specify the materials and colors used for the pedestrian connection. Per FWCC Section 22- 1634(d)(2),pedestrian pathways shall be delineated by a separate paved route using a variation in paved texture and color(may include stone,brick, or granite pavers, exposed aggregate, stamped/colored concrete). Lakehaven Utility District, Brian Asbury(253-941-1516, brian.asbury@lakehaven.org) Applicant will need to submit an application to Lakehaven for a Developer Pre-Design Meeting for Lakehaven to formally commence the water plan review process required for the proposed relocation of an existing fire hydrant. Lakehaven emphasizes that owners/developers/applicants need to apply Ms. Billings September I,20(18 Page 2 separately to Lakehaven for the noted process, and such application should be made early in the pre- design/planning phase to avoid delays in the overall development process. Further detail and/or design guidance and requirements regarding water distribution facilities will be provided only after the owner/developer/applicant has submitted the appropriate application to Lakehaven. CLOSING Your project is now on hold until we receive the information requested. With your resubmittal,please provide five copies of a response letter that addresses each issue listed. Please provide six sets of revised plans. For all other materials,please provide two copies. Please use the enclosed resubmittal form. You must resubmit your application materials within 180 days or your project will be deemed expired per FWCC Section 22-35. If you should have any questions you may contact me at 253-835-2622 or david.lee@cityoffederalway.com. I look forward to continue working with you on this project. Sincerely, avid Lee Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form Redlined Landscaping Plan c: Brian Asbury,Lakehaven Utility District Ann Dower,Engineering Plans Reviewer Soma Chattopadhyay,Traffic Analyst 08-101215 Doc.1.D.46938 441......1 CITY OF Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE CEDARS REDESIGN File#08-101216-00-SE; Related File#08-101215-00-SU Description of Proposal: Construction of a new 3-story, 18,288 sqft commercial building with retail and office uses. Proponent: Jon Graves Architects, 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D,Tacoma,WA 98402 Location: 33430 13th Place South,Federal Way, WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Contact: David Lee, Associate Planner, 253-835-2622 The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist,Federal Way Comprehensive Plan,Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, and other municipal policies,plans,rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.032(2)(c).This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services (Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718,Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Phone: 253-835-2607. This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on October 20,2008. Responsible Official: Greg Fewins Position/Title: Director of Community Development Services Address: 33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718,Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 itDate Issued: October 4, 2008 Signature: 11,----:- Doc ID.47196 . r FEDERAL WAY ‘," 11) IP) ,R - Your Community Newspaper - Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi-weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way L-1378 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 12th day of April, 2008 , and ending on the 12th day of April, 2008, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $93.73 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090 Subscribed to and sworn before me this 15th day of April, 2008. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way \�l\NlllISl►I///, ��o�``Pt4�'A. HE4�''�.,�% 19y- a `�� ,��GQt�{N1ENT�cj ,�,9 �% c� N,�y°Ry� ': N�1'•,d►• UBL1 cb ,,'oa►►WAS0` 1414 SO.324TH STREET,SUITE B2I0,FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003 ■ 253-925-5565 IN FAX:253-925-5750 COYOF!■aINliA.WAY NOTION OF UI E AIPP 6 CA1fION. Project New Cedars Redoogn Nevi gology, te c micial building with retail on first floor and blic*ace on upper floors.Project includes re- Atrealliett Jon Graves Architects,3110 Ruston Wag,Suite D,Tacoma,WA 98402 Agit Same as applicant Owner Tom Pierson,PO Box 502,Milton,WA SINIS 3343013th Place South(Par- il!EM1190-0010)' 191Ms lication Received: March 12,2008 Glbfrw rr rred Complete: April 3,2008 GaW.1Notice of Application: April 12,2008 C i1MMNa Deadline:•5 p.m.,Apra 28,2008 AMMO Required: Land Use Process Ill (08- ination: File#08-101216.0O-SE COWits Known at this Time and not includ- edlltti*Application: Building Permit/Engineers ing Oggloval vuonmenta/ Documents: Environ- • Cheddist, Stormwater/Drainage Techni* • tiglimation Report(TIR) • Wort Environmental Documents are Avail ' ablitatioe Address Below: X Yes _No Regulations to be used for Project Known at this Time: Federal Way City Ai*Person may submit written comments on 1(o erarironmental impacts of the proposal to the DMedor of Community Development Services by &WOpre.on April 28,2008.Details of appeal pro- m:Wm for the requested environmental decision wi be included with the written decision. Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regu- Mo'ra,including the FWCC environmental and zoning*odes;surface and storrnwater manage- ment codes;King County Road Standards;and tang County Surface Water Design Manual. CJty• -Collect: Associate Planner David Lee,253- The etlidal file is available for public review at the City of Federal Way,Department of Community Devgic011egt Sickle,33325 tilt MOM,SOON PO Dm IRA Ndeib Way,WA 98083.971t FVNr ta7a Dale et Publiaellott Apil 12,200111- A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Way 253-835-7000;Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance 0 Notice of Public Hearing before the (DS) and Scoping Notice Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Hearing ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ FWCC Interpretation 0 Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ Other was Vr.mailed 0 faxed 0 e-mailed and/or 0 posted to or at each of the attached addresses on Pt-?cli, , 2008. Project Name CeelZfg nj es y File Number(s) 13?' l 1�/ -l) Q , �S- /6/3// - SF Date Signature g `1 /t R" K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distdbutbn.doc/Last printed 1/3/2008 4:54:00 PM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Cedars Redesign Project Description: New 3-story, 18,288sgft commercial building with retail on first floor and office space on upper floors. Project includes related site improvements. Applicant: Jon Graves Architects, 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D,Tacoma, WA 98402 Agent: Same as applicant Owner: Tom Pierson, PO Box 502, Milton,WA 98354 Project Location: 33430 13th Place South(Parcel #768190-0010) Date Application Received: March 12, 2008 Date Determined Complete: April 3, 2008 Date of Notice of Application: April 12, 2008 Comment Deadline: 5 p.m., April 28, 2008 Permits Required: Land Use Process III(08-101215-00-UP) SEPA Determination: File#08-1 0 1 2 1 6-00-SE Other Permits Known at this Time and not Included in this Application: Building Permit/Engineering Approval Relevant Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist, Stormwater/Drainage Technical Information Report(TIR) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations to be used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Any person may submit written comments on the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community Development Services by 5:00 p.m. on April 28,2008. Details of appeal procedures for the requested environmental decision will be included with the written decision. Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including the FWCC environmental and zoning codes; surface and stormwater management codes; King County Road Standards; and King County Surface Water Design Manual. City Contact: Associate Planner David Lee, 253-835-2622 The official file is available for public review at the City of Federal Way, Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on April 12,2008. Doc I D.44977 Map Date:October 27,2006 City Of City of Federal Way T Resident Mailil PO.8ox9718 Federal Way Notification Area 33325 8 h Ave 35-i Federal Way Wa.981ii3 Fede-835-7000 wwwcityoffederalway.com 172104 I 9035 172104 9059 172104 172104 172104 9031 9138 9049 172104 6100 172104 9033 -.-.-,:... 172104 9084 926501 0050 172104 9020 172104 9122 926501 - - 172104 - - 768190; - - 0040 766190 768190 0060 768190. « 926511 0031 0q 172104 s a j8B19b s y 0070' -2 tic � `� ,, 'SF` a_ 122108 926503 - 926501 0053 926503 926503 0010 - 0010 • 6055 J 926503 2 a 0036 C; 928503. r ao56 c~ 926503 LL• 0020 C CL S 336TH ST o 202104 9070 202104 RECEIVED 9089 WISk Legend MAR 12 2008 King County Tax Lots A CITY OF MEMOMEM r _. Parcel 7681900010 CITY OF FED .�,� Federal Way �! 0 50 100 S y' Parcels within 300'of parcel 7681900010 Feet Tills MaPb Intendedu se as a yakhical repreenta0on acy. The city of Federal 1Nay makes rw warranty as to its accuraq. FEMA US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS JOE HENRY REGION 10 NTH DIV ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES CVN SVC 130 228TH ST SW PO BOX 3755 935 POW ELL AVE SW BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 SEATTLE WA 98124 RENTON WA 98055 EPA DEPT OF ECOLOGY WSDOT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS 1200 6TH AVE MD-126 PO BOX 47703 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SEATTLE WA 98101 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 PO BOX 47331 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331 RAMON PAZOOKI JAMEY TAYLOR WA NATURAL HERITAGE SNO-KING PLANNING MGR DNR SEPA CENTER DNR WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 47015 PO BOX 47014 PO BOX 330310 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY& WA STATE DEPT WILDLIFE RANDY PEARSON HISTORIC PRESERVATION 600 CAPITOL WAY N WASH STATE PARKS PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98501-1091 PO BOX 42668 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2668 JULIE STOFEL TRAVIS NELSON LARRY FISHER WDFW WDFW W REGION 4 OFFICE PO BOX 73249 W17D75 12TH AVE NW STE 201 16018 MILL CREEK BLVD PUYALLUP WA 98373 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 MILL CREEK WA 98012 US FISH &WILDLIFE SERVCE DOH-DIV OF DRINKING WATER ATTN SEPA REVIEW 510 DESMOND DR SE #102 ENV DOCUMENTS REVIEWER PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY LACEY WA 98503 PO BOX 47822 1904 3 AVE STE 105 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7822 SEATTLE WA 98101-3317 PORT OF TACOMA PSRC ENVIRONMENTAL DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT PO BOX 1837 PO BOX 1209 1011 WESTERN AVE #500 TACOMA WA 98401-1837 SEATTLE WA 98111 SEATTLE WA 98104-1040 SHIRLEY MARROQUIN GARY KRIEDT KC WASTEWATER TREATMENT KING COUNTY TRANSIT DIV PERRY WEINBERG MS KSC-NR-0505 ENV PLANNING MS KSC-TR-0431 SOUND TRANSIT 201 S JACKSON ST 201 S JACKSON ST 401 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 SEATTLE WA 98104-2826 LISA DINSMORE SOUTH KING COUNTY KING COUNTY PARKS LAND US SVC KCDDES REGIONAL WATER ASSOCIATION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW 27224 144TH AVE SE PO BOX 3517 RENTON WA 98057-5212 KENT WA 98042 REDMOND WA 98073-3517 KC BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ROD HANSEN SOLID WASTE DIV LEE DORIGAN 810 THIRD AVE STE 608 KING CO DEPT OF NATURAL RES PUBLIC HEALTH SEATTLE/KING SEATTLE WA 98104-1693 201 S JACKSON ST STE 701 401 FIFTH AVE STE 1100 SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 SEATTLE WA 98104 KING CO ROADS DIVISION GERI WALKER LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST COUNTY ROADS ENGINEER FWPS PO BOX 4249 155 MONROE AVE NE 31405 18TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 RENTON WA 98056 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE FW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL 31617 1ST AVE S PO BOX 3440 PO BOX 1877 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 AUBURN WA 98071 eSAgalc Fsfi MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE LAURA MURPHY COMCAST CABLE STORE FISHERIES DIVISION TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST 1414 S 324TH ST STE 211 ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 39015 172ND AVE SE 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98002 AUBURN WA 98092 1164 LINDA HAYES cC PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER 3009 E PORTLAND AVE 2401 S 35TH ST 2401 S 35T" ST TACOMA WA 98404 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 PIERCE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT PIERCE COUNTY BOUNDARY AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT 3629 S"D" ST REVIEW BOARD 915 FOURTH NE TACOMA WA 98408 2401 S 35TH ST AUBURN WA 98002 TACOMA WA 98409 PLANNING &CD DEPT CITY CLERK PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY OF AUBURN PACIFIC CITY HALL ALGONA CITY HALL 25 W MAIN ST 100 THIRD AVE SE 402 WARDE ST AUBURN WA 98001 PACIFIC WA 98047 ALGONA WA 98001-8505 KENT CITY HALL CITY OF TACOMA BLUS JOE ELTRICH PLANNING DEPT LAND USE ADMINISTRATOR TACOMA WATER DIVISION 220 4TH AVE S 747 MARKET ST STE 345 PO BOX 11007 KENT WA 98032 TACOMA WA 98402-3769 TACOMA WA 98411 NE TAC NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL MARION WEED CHAIR HAYES ALEXANDER PLNG CHAIR C/O JAMES COLBURN NORTHEAST TACOMA NORTHEAST TACOMA TACOMA ECONOMIC DEV NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL 747 MARKET ST RM 900 4735 NE 42ND ST 5308 RIDGE DR NE TACOMA WA 98402-3793 TACOMA WA 98422 TACOMA WA 98422 CRAIG GIBSON TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES CITY OF LAKEWOOD CITY OF MILTON O BOX 10510 GRAVELLY LK DR SW STE 206 1000 LAUREL ST P PO COX 11007W 98411 LAKEWOOD WA 98499-5013 MILTON WA 98354 CITY OF SEATAC CITY OF DES MOINES CITY OF NORMANDY PARK 4800 S 188TH ST 21630 11 TH AVE S 801 SW 174T"ST SEATAC WA 98188 DES MOINES WA 98198 NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 ♦ i CITY OF BURIEN TERRY LUKENS CITY HALL CITY OF FRIFE BELLEVUE COUNCIL OFFICE 5411 ST E 415 SW 150TH STFE WA 98424 PO BOX 90012 FIBURIEN WA 98166-1957 BELLEVUE WA 98009-9012 WATER DISTRICT#54 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT MIDWAY SEWER DISTRICT 922 S 219TH ST PO BOX 3867 PO BOX 3487 DES MOINES WA 98198-6392 KENT WA 98032-0367 KENT WA 98032 WATER DISTRICT#111 COVINGTON WATER DISTRICT PAT PROUSE 27224 144TH AVE SE 18631 SE 300TH PL QWESTH KENT WA 98042-9058 KENT WA 98042-9208 1600 7 AVE RM 1206 SEATTLE WA 98121 LORI KITTREDGE MARY AUSBURN JILL GASTON REALTY SPEC METRO TRANSIT PSE BPA KSC-TR-0413 6905 S 228TH ST SKC-SVC 914 AVE"D" 201 S JACKSON ST KENT WA 98032 SNOHOMISH WA 98290 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 WASH ENVIRON COUNCIL CHRIS CARREL LINDA SHAFFER 615 2ND AVE STE 380 FRIENDS OF THE HYLEBOS PIERCE TRANSIT SEATTLE WA 98104-2245 PO BOX 24971 PO BOX 99070 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 LAKEWOOD WA 98499-0070 SAM PACE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS RN COMMUNITY COUNCIL SEA/KING CO ASSOC/REALTORS OF SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 4274 29839 154 AVE SE PO BOX 66037 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 KENT WA 98042-4557 BURIEN WA 98166 MICHAEL FELDMAN ATTN NEWSROOM AVIATION PLANNING SEATAC WASH STATE OCD TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE PO BOX 68727 901 COLUMBIA ST SW 1950 S STATE ST SEATTLE WA 98168-0727 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8300 TACOMA WA 98405 SEATTLE PI LISA PEMBERTON-BUTLER FEDERAL WAY NEWS 101 ELLIOTT AVE W SEATTLETHIMES NORTH 14006 1ST AVE S STE B SEATTLE WA 98121 1200 112 AVE NE STE C145 BURIEN WA 98168 BELLEVUE WA 98004-3748 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL JOHN KIM KOREA POST 1414 S 324TH ST STE B-210 PO BOX 130 28815 PACIFIC HWY S STE 4B FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KENT WA 98035-0130 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KING COUNTY ASSESSORS HOLLY WILLIAMSON CITY OF EDGEWOOD 500 4TH AVE RM 700 OLYMPIC PIPELINE CO 2221 MERIDIAN AVE E SEATTLE WA 98104 2319 LIND AVE SW EDGEWOOD WA 98371-1010 RENTON WA 98055 • CRESTVIEW SHORECLUB ASSN MHACC MIRROR LK RESIDENTS ASSN 4817 SW 310TH ST C/O WI THIAM HICKS 525 SW 312T"ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 29219 7 PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 NORTH LAKE COMNTY CLUB WEST GREEN CONDO ASSN REDONDO COMMUNITY CLUB 33228 38TH AVE S 432 S 321ST PL PO BOX 5118 AUBURN WA 98001 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 REDONDO WA 98054 STEEL LK RESIDENTS ASSN BARCLAY PLACE HOA BELMOR PARK HOA 2329 S 304TH ST 1034 SW 334TH ST 2101 S 324TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BELLACARINO WOODS HOA BELLRIDGE TOWNHOMES HOA CAMPUS GLEN HOA 35204 6TH AVE SW 1438 S 308TH LN 32806 6TH PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 TWIN LAKES HOA MAR CHERI COMNTY CLUB BROOKLAKE COMNTY CENTER 3420 SW 320TH ST #28 PO BOX 25281 726 S 356TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 KEN SHATOCK COMCAST-SE PUGET SOUND ARE GROUSE POINTE HOA KINGSGROE HOA CONSTRUCTION/ENG MANAGER 2613 S 379TH PL 1911 SW CAMPUS DR #621 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 4020 AUBURN WAY N FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 AUBURN WA 98002 MASTER BUILDERS ASSOC CHERYL PARAS 335 116T"AVE SE PSE CMTY�SERVICES DEPT BELLEVUE WA 98004-6407 3130 S 38 ST TACOMA WA 98409 Revised April 2,2008 K:\Environmental Checklists\Agency Mailing List.doc TVI + -µ oo •r oo .. NI ;a NO X AO 0 O ' O .4 '- ti '.O - : '.- 0 O JGCD W : W aW O O O O ? . rOtO '-iO O O O OO - - O T 1..4 /,' ` x ' F/yNv 0 n x r H N D I-' Z ril n O v1 I'll i o --. .. p �' Jo. C:7a ` o kC17 . �/ H O z , o Z 73 Y '1 it r, .": tiio :I":'',.:-, ,,, : ,7,...-5 t...,t11 .z.., 01:1, n,, Q r H n a{ E WW ' O a. CC 74' M a -I � x Z IJ r-5 0 O } C✓ CD rt o h r V -fir 2' vas. Y r;`i 01 (D n m a IItA cnoDCDD . w M r C En - P., -, C �r 4; L:. F 'T • VI ro p m > - > cs.. y a aa Y a10 1/40 <1 00 t .— N -w =.ya• e" r N tL] s �t 3t X P Print Map Page Page 1 of 1 kiiKingCounty Home News Services Comments Search Parcel Map and Data 1721049122 I 172i049o26 / I 7681900040 76ei900060 76e1900050 r I --" `"." 7691900030 t 7681900045 1721049047 .rn, , ..�_........A..,�,..»...__x ..,.. T....�,.. ..N��.,..,�.,,y� � ;7#3$19[1t1�Q1II rj. 1 lederaiWa , 7681900070 tio 7681gloom 765 20 { 1721049112 i I 9265030053 a I 9265030035 I i 9265030010 g 9265030055 n»� w 9265030030 I 9265030050 9265030040 I 9265030020 {C) Count ___J . . 0rr..ri4611 Parcel Number 7681900010 Address Zipcode Taxpayer CELEBRATION TERRACE L L C The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice.King County makes no representations or warranties,express or implied,as to accuracy,completeness,timeliness,or rights to the use of such information.King County shall not be liable for any general,special,indirect,incidental,or consequential damages including,but not limited to,lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map.Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." King County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details SOD AVM 1V J3O3j AO AIDRECEIVED 800Z g I eibol MAR 12 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY .®JAIJJ CDS • http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp • � 1/2/2008 41111111610..... DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South 971 PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal +�� 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 1 y www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, fYct'J CCAV k A hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: Notice of Land Use Application/Action 0 Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance 0 Notice of Public Hearing before the (DS) and Scoping Notice Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination 0 Notice of Planning Commission Public of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Hearing ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental 0 Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS 0 Shoreline Management Permit ❑ FWCC Interpretation 0 Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ Other 7 was 0 mailed 0 faxed 0 e-mailed and/or 42 posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 41 ptcy ? , 2008. Project Name ckk f(d,e-s%Gr\ LL J File Number(s) � 01 213 a) ` 0 t l Signature Date 1 ( to A..)� K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sltes.doc/Last printed 4/10/2008 1:12:00 PM Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall -33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library-34200 1st Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library-848 South 320th Street Subject Site - K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc/Last printed 4/10/2008 1:12:00 PM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Cedars Redesign Project Description: New 3-story, 18,288sqft commercial building with retail on first floor and office space on upper floors.Project includes related site improvements. Applicant: Jon Graves Architects, 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D,Tacoma,WA 98402 Agent: Same as applicant Owner: Tom Pierson,PO Box 502,Milton,WA 98354 Project Location: 33430 13th Place South(Parcel#768190-0010) Date Application Received: March 12,2008 Date Determined Complete: April 3,2008 Date of Notice of Application: April 12, 2008 Comment Deadline: 5 p.m.,April 28, 2008 Permits Required: Land Use Process III(08-101215-00-UP) SEPA Determination: File#08-101216-00-SE Other Permits Known at this Time and not Included in this Application: Building Permit/Engineering Approval Relevant Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist, Stormwater/Drainage Technical Information Report(TIR) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations to be used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Any person may submit written comments on the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community Development Services by 5:00 p.m. on April 28,2008.Details of appeal procedures for the requested environmental decision will be included with the written decision. Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations,including the FWCC environmental and zoning codes; surface and stormwater management codes;King County Road Standards; and King County Surface Water Design Manual. City Contact: Associate Planner David Lee, 253-835-2622 The official file is available for public review at the City of Federal Way,Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on April 12,2008. Doc.I .44977 A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 CITY OF �� Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Way 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, '�a-f. c./ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: pf Notice of Land Use Application/Action 0 Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the (DS) and Scoping Notice Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Hearing ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ Other wasNcer 0 mailed CI faxed ,fie-mailed and/or 0 posted to or at each of the attached addresses on : c IO , 2008. Project Name CA ors ` ea File Number(s) g )n/DJ S- )O) C--- SE Signature , Date e/ -lb r-0 S K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/3/2008 4:54:00 PM > ` CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Cedars Redesign Project Description: New 3-story, 18,288sqft commercial building with retail on first floor and office space on upper floors. Project includes related site improvements. Applicant: Jon Graves Architects, 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D,Tacoma,WA 98402 Agent: Same as applicant Owner: Tom Pierson, PO Box 502,Milton, WA 98354 Project Location: 33430 13th Place South(Parcel#768190-0010) Date Application Received: March 12, 2008 Date Determined Complete: April 3, 2008 Date of Notice of Application: April 12, 2008 Comment Deadline: 5 p.m., April 28, 2008 Permits Required: Land Use Process III(08-101215-00-UP) SEPA Determination: File#08-101216-00-SE Other Permits Known at this Time and not Included in this Application: Building Permit/Engineering Approval Relevant Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist, Stormwater/Drainage Technical Information Report (TIR) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations to be used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Any person may submit written comments on the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community Development Services by 5:00 p.m.on April 28, 2008. Details of appeal procedures for the requested environmental decision will be included with the written decision. Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including the FWCC environmental and zoning codes; surface and stormwater management codes; King County Road Standards; and King County Surface Water Design Manual. City Contact: Associate Planner David Lee, 253-835-2622 The official file is available for public review at the City of Federal Way, Depaitiilent of Community Development Services, 33325 8t Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on April 12,2008. Doc.I D 44977 Map Date:October 27,2006 City of City of Resident Mailii 18Federa'way • Gis Division P.O.Box97 33325 8th Ave S. Federal Way Notification Area , 172104 t 9035 172104 172104 9059 172104 172104 9049 9031 172104 9138 9100 172104 9033 _.. 172104 9064 4 926501 - - 0050 172104 9020 172164; 9122 172104 926501 0040 - 9026 1 768190. 00313 768190 768190. . 768190 0060 0050..: - - 928501 0031 766190: - 172104 9047 R6y 789190 �� j F ti a r 172104 y 911. " ",9/ > , 926503 926503 ' 926501 3 0035 a 926503 0010 -H - 0010 $26503 Qd55 a ao3C 92e563 = 926503 LL 005Q M 9d5u 926503 ao2o C LL S 336TH ST 1 202,04 2oz,oa 9070 9069 DID Legend MAR ECE 1 2VE 2008 King County Tax Lots CITY OF`` Parcel7681900010 CITY OF FED AL v Federal Way Parcels within 300'of pa • r 7681900010 0 50 100 S ills map Is Walled ar use as a graptdcal represenlatWn ally. .= P Feet The City or Federal Way makes no warranty as to ds securaq. (4/10/2908)Tamara Fix Re Legal Notice- Cedars Page From: Teryl Heller<theller@fedwaymirror.com> To: "Tamara Fix"<Tamara.Fix@cityoffederalway.com> Date: 4/10/2008 10:01 AM Subject: Re: Legal Notice-Cedars Attachments: Part.001; 11440519076.doc Thanks, Tamara. Will do. Teryl Heller Federal Way Mirror 1414 South 324th Street, Suite B210 Federal Way, WA 98003 (phone)253-925-5565 (fax)253-925-5750 On Apr 10, 2008, at 9:05 AM, Tamara Fix wrote: > Please publish the following legal notice (Cedars Redesign NOA, > 08-101215) in Saturday's (April 12, 2008) issue. > Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. >Thanks! > Tamara Fix >Administrative Assistant > City of Federal Way > PO Box 9718 > Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 >253-835-2602 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF 11P"..""aftle Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Fed e ra I Way 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION .S1hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the (DS) and Scoping Notice Hearing Examiner IS Notice of Environmental Determination 0 Notice of Planning Commission Public of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Hearing ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ Other was AS mailed— 0 faxed 0 e-mailed and/or ❑posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 5 c ` 3 , 2008. Project Name Qj n cg� S,.‘ File Number(s) i8-1O )Dl 6 �' 08 6) cJ g-- S U Signature Date !0- -0 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/3/2008 4:53:00 PM CITY OF 1011Nlr�/ Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE CEDARS REDESIGN File#08-101216-00-SE; Related File#08-101215-00-SU Description of Proposal: Construction of a new 3-story, 18,288 sqft commercial building with retail and office uses. Proponent: Jon Graves Architects, 3110 Ruston Way,Suite D,Tacoma,WA 98402 Location: 33430 13th Place South,Federal Way,WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Contact: David Lee,Associate Planner,253-835-2622 The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist,Federal Way Comprehensive Plan,Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, and other municipal policies,plans,rules,and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)is not required under RCW 43.21C.032(2)(c).This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services(Federal Way City Hall,33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718,Federal Way,WA 98063-9718).Phone: 253-835-2607. This Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS)is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on October 20,2008. Responsible Official: Greg Fewins Position/Title: Director of Community Development Services Address: 33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718,Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 • AtiDate Issued: October 4,2008 Signature: Doc.ID.47196 Map Date:October 27,2006 city of Federal Way City of Resident Mail' 8th Ve$ Federal Way Notification AreaFederal—'mop , 172104 9035 172104 9 172104gm9049 172104 17 9031 172/04 gm 172104 9033 1721049084 � ,,3:} , .spy f- #ty 928501 c 1, , a-4 z t$`° � 172104 0050 + ` 1 p^a a... . i `r a - '' „� tt 9020 -r {v'i�.r:s rF^r r w kf A.. • S�`' � a ,,,. o r. k � 5r w. ' .r ;3 t- • s.- }J ^ , 5 . ' 1C &, w ,� 4 af � '<a�seY;::: s .a^ " h"t F ,t x s �agy � bS� 4x£rr 1a�aS-t k^' ;gk- S G '{ 72 r U $s= "�`a� .M�r s+ x � x�,. '4 ' � .4 � P� : y C 3"c� et *_ ,5 ,. - '�"t em.h y & rl"*c , . f tfs r ? t .92501ta t� S �� a 5 ; f C f s ns' 30049Z v gy` 9 3 `tv^- k f4 4S ' t . 1,-4f" 11`s; .•kc ooeo i : d�t Yt 1" '788190 �^ S. --{ �� ANk ;.,,.'' '.=-.Vt =h.t Wit°da i, : •j az� »�, d . 4-'1 z v- .»928501 r 4"8 : 928503 0010 s xt +_ '_ 0010 VJ9j d; 0 J s o f -•w-, ate• -'- 926503 ? '1 .r L > y "n- 4'. s 4 $. 3' +V.d 1' ,.V Y. aR- S 336TH ST 202104 202104 9070 RECEIVED 9089 Legend MAR 12 2008 King County Tax Lots CITY OF Parcel 7681900010 CITY OF FED AL ; Federal Way ;.;.,; 0 50 100 VJ�vs • Parcels within 300'of parcel 7681900010 Feet :Zs map is intended for use as a yraphieal ropresomation ony. t" ='" The ciy or Federal Wry makes no wartarry as to as aeeuroq. Print Map Page Page 1 of 1 tell King county Home News Services Comments Search Parcel Map and Data 172100i22 1721049026 f/ 1651900040 7681900060 7661900050 766i900030 / 768/900045 721049647 768 10 fi , Federal Way 766i900070 o f+' 7681900010 7681900020 /72/0R9ii2 9265030053 9265030035 92650300i0 9265030055 9265030030 9265030050 1 9265030040 9265030020 (C)2t]08 IG ig Ccwi1y 111 0 abtl Parcel Number 7681900010 Address Zipcode Taxpayer CELEBRATION TERRACE L L C The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice.King County makes no representations or warranties,express or implied,as to accuracy,completeness,timeliness,or rights to the use of such information.King County shall not be liable for any general,special,indirect,incidental,or consequential damages including,but not limited to,lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map.Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." King County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. sU RECEIVED AVM 1 3a AC.. 800Z g MAR 12 2008 CITY i) DE :L. 'd'1Ay. CD-,- http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 1/2/2008 0 0 Cr 0) 000 ,n MO 0 - Cr) a1 CO N o 00 d 0M0 O, M O; N O1 a_ 00 O\ 0 00 N 00 N r ON M ,,O -00 ,n -. N , 3 d v 00 N d O- 00 °r° in d v ) v) p� 03 '3 33 Q333 3 (I) , ZdW d a w w z Hrr- W Zn P; � a 0 ow00H ' 0 < L) Q < < P4 < Z 0 Q ` C7 w 4 X H `oo H w_C4`V)i w, 4.) w k;: o " a N � o It N W a W wit vim] I 2, N T w v) z v)>Z I. i', "��¢" o co v) 3w Wr. F4 ,4i a q G) z F, W Z > d Z >" ,--1 ,>�� . d ��-1 E, O, -a c x d > x NO p c4 !,, ✓ a �" '•r M 3 u) H d ..•, z , 0 d 0 f Pa N Q O `VD 00 , , ,„-0 -, N `,,,hw� _ H z O v' "O O 3 Cn Q N r-- N O Pa M O `�v� 'i M O' �Y 3 z fYi [� P� C N- M •--,. O ,N N IM .--,'CD -, --� -.. N --O '� Q N N 00 -CK) P. wi. \O -!M M v7 .-+ (72.. M O1 P. =Cco O C g r .. d(a z C '.0 -, - P!i d a) 0 A. co m A o d 0 0 0 Z 0 w 0 x x vi d o 0 { O O cn m RI N Z F", J �" CO 63 < d d r <,P-ibi d" "C w C d _ Q. - , °P i I 0 •� O m �,�.! °.win' !z 2 a 00 d _O 0 P" v p N U a.. W W >N H 0 x Z :IIO O va W f" r/t- ,-+ W W 00 Q a z A >�, w - L z O .U A, U g4 o 0 v) z z Q -1 Z w 03 " a CJz 0 z 0 a O , x x. ,_>-' - v)- w w O 0? cn , 2 Q . d w W H as Z 0 > Z 0 . W W d z A rx O ,0 Q 3 3z Q Wd;� rc > aN � � 0 � Ww - Z 3 W CO J 0 x `"a� z W W Q z x y W w 0 0 Q U ''f *' > 2 g Q ,_, z 0 I- , Q; ° Q v - x � Q 3 H r0i0 0 H w U) I' �O N N N O Q O O -v, a O O O O M V, '~ I- N V' .-, N N M -J" -7 V� 6 -M M C . V, V, cp 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 o a o 0 o O U Q LJ_ O C C OR Ot o 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 V 'V' 7 V' a O O -0 a -a o _M" M M M M M W .mac X O_ O_ O O O, OR OR OR ON -C C -O _O O O O trlO ct 0 N N N N 00 00 00 v.) 00 QO oo RC,N RO NO �O NO N I., N M st In CO 00 Cr) O 04 co V- � CO N- H bt.1S 4 s eW e0d 4- -044 cLe.c,k):s'& FEMA US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS JOE HENRY REGION 10 NTH DIV ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES CVN SVC 130 228TH ST SW PO BOX 3755 935 POWELL AVE SW BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 SEATTLE WA 98124 RENTON WA 98055 EPA DEPT OF ECOLOGY WSDOT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS 1200 6TH AVE MD-126 PO BOX 47703 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SEATTLE WA 98101 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 PO BOX 47331 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331 RAMON PAZOOKI JAMEY TAYLOR WA NATURAL HERITAGE SNO-KING PLANNING MGR DNR SEPA CENTER DNR WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY p0 BOX 47015 PO BOX 47014 PO BOX 330310 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY& WA STATE DEPT WILDLIFE RANDY PEARSON HISTORIC PRESERVATION 600 CAPITOL WAY N WASH STATE PARKS PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98501-1091 PO BOX 42668 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2668 JULIE STOFEL TRAVIS NELSON LARRY FISHER WDFW WDFVV REGION 4 OFFICE PO BOX 73249 17D75 12T"AVE NW STE 201 16018 MILL CREEK BLVD PUYALLUP WA 98373 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 MILL CREEK WA 98012 US FISH &WILDLIFE SERVCE DOH-DIV OF DRINKING WATER ATTN SEPA REVIEW 510 DESMOND DR SE #102 ENV DOCUMENTS REVIEWER PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY LACEY WA 98503 PO BOX 47822 1904 3RD AVE STE 105 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7822 SEATTLE WA 98101-3317 PORT OF TACOMA PSRC ENVIRONMENTAL DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT PO BOX 1837 PO BOX 1209 1011 WESTERN AVE #500 TACOMA WA 98401-1837 SEATTLE WA 98111 SEATTLE WA 98104-1040 SHIRLEY MARROQUIN GARY KRIEDT KC WASTEWATER TREATMENT KING COUNTY TRANSIT DIV PERRY WEINBERG MS KSC-NR-0505 ENV PLANNING MS KSC-TR-0431 SOUND TRANSIT 201 S JACKSON ST 201 S JACKSON ST 401 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 SEATTLE WA 98104-2826 MARK CARY SOUTH KING COUNTY KING COUNTY PARKS LAND US SVC KCDDES REGIONAL WATER ASSOCIATION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW 27224 144TH AVE SE PO BOX 3517 RENTON WA 98055-1219 KENT WA 98042 REDMOND WA 98073-3517 KC BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ROD HANSEN SOLID WASTE DIV LEE DORIGAN 810 THIRD AVE STE 608 KING CO DEPT OF NATURAL RES PUBLIC HEALTH SEATTLE/KING SEATTLE WA 98104-1693 201 S JACKSON ST STE 701 401 FIFTH AVE STE 1100 SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 SEATTLE WA 98104 KING CO ROADS DIVISION GERI WALKER LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST COUNTY ROADS ENGINEER FWPS 155 MONROE AVE NE 31405 18TH AVE S PO BOX 4249 RENTON WA 98056 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE FW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL 31617 1ST AVE S PO BOX 3440 PO BOX 1877 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 AUBURN WA 98071 KL H INDIA TRIBE LAURA MURPHY COMCAST CABLE STORE HE S 10 TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST 1414 324TH S V O M TAL R IE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 9 5 7 D E 39015 172ND AVE SE BU WA 002 AUBURN WA 98092 LINDA HAYES PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER 3009 E PORTLAND AVE 2401 S 35TH ST 2401 S 35TH ST TACOMA WA 98404 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 PIERCE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT PIERCE COUNTY BOUNDARY AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT 3629 S"D" ST REVIEW BOARD 915 FOURTH NE TACOMA WA 98408 2401 S 35 ST AUBURN WA 98002 TACOMA WA 98409 PLANNING &CD DEPT CITY CLERK PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY OF AUBURN PACIFIC CITY HALL ALGONA CITY HALL 25 W MAIN ST 100 THIRD AVE SE 402 WARDE ST AUBURN WA 98001 PACIFIC WA 98047 ALGONA WA 98001-8505 KENT CITY HALL CITY OF TACOMA BLUS JOE ELTRICH PLANNING DEPT LAND USE ADMINISTRATOR TACOMA WATER DIVISION 220 4TH AVE S 747 MARKET ST STE 345 PO BOX 11007 KENT WA 98032 TACOMA WA 98402-3769 TACOMA WA 98411 NE TAC NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL MARION WEED CHAIR HAYES ALEXANDER PLNG CHAIR C/O JAMES COLBURN NORTHEAST TACOMA NORTHEAST TACOMA TACOMA ECONOMIC DEV NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL 747 MARKET ST RM 900 4735 NE 42ND ST 5308 RIDGE DR NE TACOMA WA 98402-3793 TACOMA WA 98422 TACOMA WA 98422 CRAIG GIBBON CITY OF LAKEWOOD CITY OF MILTON TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 10510 GRAVELLY LK DR SW STE 206 1000 LAUREL ST PO BOX 11007 LAKEWOOD WA 98499-5013 MILTON WA 98354 TACOMA WA 98411 CITY OF SEATAC CITY OF DES MOINES CITY OF NORMANDY PARK 4800 S 188TH ST 21630 11TH AVE S 801 SW 174TH ST SEATAC WA 98188 DES MOINES WA 98198 NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 CITY OF BURIEN TERRY LUKENS CITY OF FIFE CITY HALL 5411 23RD ST E BELLEVUE COUNCIL OFFICE 415 SW 150TH ST PO BOX 90012 FIFE WA 98424 BURIEN WA 98166-1957 BELLEVUE WA 98009-9012 WATER DISTRICT#54 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT MIDWAY SEWER DISTRICT 922 S 219TH ST PO BOX 3867 PO BOX 3487 DES MOINES WA 98198-6392 KENT WA 98032-0367 KENT WA 98032 WATER DISTRICT#111 COVINGTON WATER DISTRICT PAT PROUSE 27224 144TH AVE SE 18631 SE 300TH PL QWESTH KENT WA 98042-9058 KENT WA 98042-9208 S EAT 7 AVE RM 120E SEATTLE WA 98121 LORI KITTREDGE MARY AUSBURN JILL GASTON REALTY SPEC METRO TRANSIT PSE BPA KSC-TR-0413 TH 201 S JACKSON ST 6905 S 228 ST SKC-SVC 914 AVE"D" SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 KENT WA 98032 SNOHOMISH WA 98290 WASH ENVIRON COUNCIL CHRIS CARREL TIM PAYNE 615 2ND AVE STE 380 FRIENDS OF THE HYLEBOS PIERCE COUNTY TRANSIT SEATTLE WA 98104-2245 PO BOX 24971 PO BOX 99070 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 LAKEWOOD WA 98499 SAM PACE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS FW COMMUNITY COUNCIL SEA/KING CO ASSOC/REALTORS OF SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 4274 29839 154TH AVE SE PO BOX 66037 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 KENT WA 98042-4557 BURIEN WA 98166 MICHAEL FELDMAN ATTN NEWSROOM AVIATION PLANNING SEATAC WASH STATE OCD TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE PO BOX 68727 901 COLUMBIA ST SW 1950 S STATE ST SEATTLE WA 98168-0727 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8300 TACOMA WA 98405 SEATTLE PI LISA PEMBERTON-BUTLER FEDERAL WAY NEWS 101 ELLIOTT AVE W SEATTLE HIMES NORTH 14006 1ST AVE S STE B SEATTLE WA 98121 1200 112 AVE NE STE C145 BURIEN WA 98168 BELLEVUE WA 98004-3748 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL JOHN KIM rH KOREA POST 1414 S 324 STE B-210 PO BOX 130 28815 PACIFIC HWY S STE 4B FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KENT WA 98035-0130 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KING COUNTY ASSESSORS HOLLY WILLIAMSON CITY OF EDGEWOOD 500 4TH AVE RM 700 OLYMPIC PIPELINE CO 2221 MERIDIAN AVE E SEATTLE WA 98104 2319 LIND AVE SW EDGEWOOD WA 98371-1010 RENTON WA 98055 CRESTVIEW SHORECLUB ASSN MHACC MIRROR LK RESIDENTS ASSN 4817 SW 310TH C/O WILLIAMTH HICKS 525 SW 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 29219 7 PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 NORTH LAKE COMNTY CLUB WEST GREEN CONDO ASSN REDONDO COMMUNITY CLUB 33228 38TH AVE S 432 S 321ST PL PO BOX 5118 AUBURN WA 98001 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 REDONDO WA 98054 STEEL LK RESIDENTS ASSN BARCLAY PLACE HOA BELMOR PARK HOA 2329 S 304TH ST 1034 SW 334TH 2101 S 324TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BELLACARINO WOODS HOA BELLRIDGE TOWNHOMES HOA CAMPUS GLEN HOA 35204 6TH AVE SW 1438 S 308TH LN 32806 6TH PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 TWIN LAKES HOA MAR CHERI COMNTY CLUB BROOKLAKE COMNTY CENTER 3420 SW 320TH ST #28 PO BOX 25281 726 S 356TH FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 KEN SHATOCK COMCAST-SE PUGET SOUND AR GROUSE POINTE HOA KINGSGROHE HOA CONSTRUCTION/ENG MANAGER 2613 S 379T 1911 SW CAMPUS DR #621 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 4020 AUBURN WAY N FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 AUBURN WA 98002 MASTER BUILDERS ASSOC LINDA SHAFFER CHERYL PARAS 335 116T"AVE SE PIERCE TRANSIT PSE CMTY SERVICES DEPT BELLEVUE WA 98004-6407 PO BOX 99070 3130 S 38TH ST LAKEWOOD WA 98499-0070 TACOMA WA 98409 Revised November 29,2007 K:\Environmental Checklists\Agency Mailing List.doc DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF "ilial/' Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Way 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, 1 arv,ar k hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the (DS) and Scoping Notice Hearing Examiner gl Notice of Environmental Determination ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Hearing ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ Other was 0 mailed 0 faxed , e-mailed and/or 0 posted to or at each of the attached addresses on C)G"L , 2008. Project Name CeJ a S 1l�deS 0. File Number(s) -16/,=)1 t - SE, 0 3-1610/ S- - S O Signature Date 1b-J-d K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/3/2008 4:53:00 PM 1 4411111k CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Cedars Redesign File No. 08-101216-00-SE Description: The proposed action is to construct a new 3-story, 18,288 sqft commercial building with retail and office uses. Applicant: Jon Graves Architects; 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D; Tacoma,WA 98402 Location: 33430 13th Place South,Federal Way,WA Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services Staff Contact: David Lee,Associate Planner,253-835-2622 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment.An environmental impact statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c).This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, final staff evaluation for this action,and other municipal policies, plans,rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.060. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by October 20,2008.You may appeal this determination to Greg Fewins,Director of Community Development Services, at the City of Federal Way(33325 8th Avenue South,PO Box 9718,Federal Way, WA 98063-9718)no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 20,2008.The appeal must be in the form of a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination.The appeal letter must make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on October 4,2008. Doc.ID.47198 Tamara Fix From: Teryl Heller[theller@fedwaymirror.com] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:48 AM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Legal Notice-Cedars Redesign Attachments: 26734900027.doc; ATT00001.htm Thanks, Tamara. Will do!! Have a good rest of the week---looks like a rainy weekend, though. Teryl Heller Federal Way Mirror 1414 South 324th Street, Suite B210 Federal Way, WA 98003 (phone)253-925-5565(fax)253-925-5750 On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Tamara Fix wrote: Please publish the following legal notice (Cedars Redesign DNS, 08-101216) in Saturday's (Oct. 4, 2008) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. Tamara. Fix 5clmin Asst. City of Federal-Way tamara fix@cityoffederaCway.com. 1 MEMORANDUM CITY OF :` . Public Works Department Federal Way DATE: 04/10/08 TO: David Lee FROM: Ann Dower; 1 SUBJECT: CEDARS REDESIGN - (08-101215-00-UP) 33430 13TH PL S; Development Services First Technical Review The information provided on March 12, 2008 has been reviewed. Please have the applicant make the following revisions: Civil Drawings Add a vicinity map. Show existing right-of-way width, sidewalk width, and the required 1'right-of-way dedication. Show conceptual streetlighting. Show street trees at 2.5"caliper, 30'-40'spacing, behind the sidewalk. Show dimensions for the proposed building, parking stalls, and drive aisles. The proposed wet vault does not meet the requirements of the Resource Stream Protection Menu. Please consult the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual for other water quality treatment options. In addition,the City of Federal Way has approved the Stormfilter®with a pretreatment facility as a stand-alone treatment option,assuming certain conditions are met. Please contact me at 253.835.2732 if you would like additional information. Any underground facility will require approval from the Surface Water Division. TIR Although an existing flow control facility may be in place for this site,the TIR and plans do not indicate what it is or where it is located. Please include a description, location, and size of the facility, and show it on the plans if it is within the limits of the drawing. Lighting Cut Sheets These will not be acceptable for street lighting. Please see City of Federal Way Development Standards and associated details for streetlight specifications. SEPA Checklist The checklist must be revised based on changes to the water quality treatment method. In Item 14.d., please note that these are private road improvements. F LE ` CITY OF CITY HALL 8t �. Fed era I Way 33325 Sth Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718 (253)835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.corn April 10, 2008 Jon Graves Architects Attn: Feather Billings 3110 Ruston Way, Suite D Tacoma,WA 98402 RE: File#08-101215-00-UP;CEDARS REDESIGN 33430 13th Place South,Federal Way Dear Ms. Billings: On March 12,2008,the City of Federal Way received your Use Process III application and State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)checklist for the above-referenced proposed three-story, 18,288sqft mixed commercial building at the above-referenced addressed. Pursuant to the development application submittal requirements established in Federal Way City Code(FWCC) Sections 22-389 and 18-49, the City has 28 days to determine whether or not your application is complete. COMPLETE APPLICATION Pursuant to the FWCC,your application has been reviewed by the Development Review Committee(DRC) and determined complete, based on the submittal requirements for Process III Project Approval and SEPA. As of the date of this letter,a 120-day time-line for technical review of the project has commenced. The City has 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. As you are aware,the 120-day timeline may be suspended at any time that the City determines that additional information is required to meet applicable code requirements,and it will be restarted within 14 days of a complete response to any such request. Having met the submittal requirements, pursuant to the FWCC,a Notice of Application will be published in the Federal Way Mirror within 14 days, and posted on the City's official notice boards. Additional public notice will be given in accordance with code when the City issues a threshold determination under SEPA. TECHNICAL COMMENTS The City's technical comments will be issued following completion of the two-week comment period for the Notice of Application. If you should have any questions regarding this letter or your development project,please feel free to contact me at 253-835-2622,or david.lee@cityoffederalway.com. I look forward to working with you on this project. Sincer David Lee Associate Planner c: Ann Dower, Engineering Plans Reviewer Chris Ingham,South King Fire Soma Chattopadhyay,Traffic Analyst Doc I D 44979 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 17, 2008 TO: Will Appleton, Development Services Manager (traffic/pwds) Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King County Fire & Rescue FROM: David Lee FOR DRC MTG. ON: Internal Completeness - April 3, 2008 FILE NUMBER(s) : 08-101215-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS. : None PROJECT NAME: CEDARS REDESIGN PROJECT ADDRESS: 33430 13TH PL S ZONING DISTRICT: BC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 3 story, 18288 sqft, commercial building with retail on the first level and office space on the second and third levels including site development LAND USE PERMITS: Preliminary Plat, SEPA PROJECT CONTACT: JON GRAVES ARCHITECTS FEATHER BILLINGS 3110 RUSTON WAY Suite D 2532724214 (Work) MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Title Report (PW-DS) Site Plan (All) Landscape (All) Civil (All) Elevations (all) Geotech (all) Lighting Plan (Building/PWDS/Traffic) TIR (PWDS) SEPA Checklist -6,04k_tritit ECIENy p ASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT M�� OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 411111610000.., 12 ZOOS 33325 8th Avenue South CITY OF PO Box 9718 FederalOF FEDERAL W AY Federal Way WA 98063-9718 VVay CIS 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 CDS www.cityoffederalway.com (r 8- 10121.5 -00 up/os-- l 0/2f b APPLICATION NO(S) ate 2-27-08 Project Name Cedars Redesign Property Address/Location 33430 13th Place Sonth Parcel Number(s) 7681900010 Project Description 3 story commercial building with retail on the first 1pvp1 and office space on the second and third 1 evpls PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Applicant Annexation Binding Site Plan Name: Boundary Line Adjustment Feather Billings c/o Jon Graves Architect: Comp Plan/Rezone Address:3110 Ruston Way, Suite D Land Surface Modification City/State: Tacoma, WA Lot Line Elimination Zip:98402 Preapplication Conference Phone: (253) 272-4214 Process I(Director=s Approval) Fax: (253) 272-4218 Process II(Site Plan Review) Email: fbil i ngs@j garchs.com x Process III(Project Approval) Signature: Process IV(Hearing Examiner's Decision) �V L' Process V(Quasi-Judicial Rezone) Agent(if different than Applicant) Process VI SEPA w/Project Name: SEPA Only Address: Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use City/State: Short Subdivision Zip: Subdivision Phone: Variance: Commercial/Residential Fax: Email: Signature: Required Information Owner BC Zoning Designation BC Comprehensive Plan Designation Name:Torn Pierson Address: P.O. Box 502 '400 06la Value of Existing Improvements City/State: Milton, WA 1 .7mil Zip: 98354 Value of Proposed Improvements Phone:(253) 838-2605 International Building Code(IBC): Fax: (253) 661-9050 B Occupancy Type Email: to{np � eralwaychamber.com Signature:' VA Construction Type Bulletin#003—August 18,2004 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application Map Date:October 27,2006 City of a • Clty d Federal Way Resident Marlin P.ODBox918 Federal WayNotification Area 33325 6 h AYE,35-7°. Federal Way Wa.55063 (206)-835-7000 www.cityotfederalway.com 172104 9035 172104 172104 9059 172104 19136 72104 9049 9031 172104 9100 172104 9033 1721049064 1 926501 0050 172104 9020 172104 91'22 926501 172104 0040 gg28 768190 0040 768190 788i90 786190 0060 0050 0030 709190 928501 0038 095 9041721047 76919b �y r` . 60070619 r,!s, -,' d Wi z 1 0^" 172_14 � r ' 9 V .926503 926503 1 926501 WSW 0030 ( 0053' 0095 926503 0010 0010 J 926503 2 a. C.: 9 0550 M 9 926503 LL 0020 r, CL S 336TH ST 1 202104 202104 9070 9069 RECEIVED Legend MAR 12 VE zoos King County Tax Lots CITY OF JP. • L ;Are`e` Parcel 7681900010 CITY OF FED 1. Federal Way 0 50 100 Parcels within 300'of parcel 7681900010 This map la intended for use as a graphical representation ony. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. • >I . ,. U " (u O . CZ co L U L 43 0 /� CO CICe (V U O O o '- i c -a O O U Oc N °, > O (Q 4- O J in a 0- u � (� F.) N C Oil " U p O Z''' !!/. 011) j 1 I ! 1 I i 14 ''' I 113 j— ___--______ , 4.11) _ _____ . _ _ __,) \_ ) , , a) , _______ _.,_ ,,,,, , . 6 IW _i__._ I ,F, Cn \I L co f \� _ as , a) ,___ j j7 o 711:11/ 1 j ______--L (a...) r i 'N.. c Web date: 04/26/2007 ✓ • • Department of Development and Environmental Services ,L�.- • Building Services Division ERU T 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton,Washington 98057-5212 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 This certificate provides the Public Health-Seattle&King County Department and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals Do not write in this box RECEIVEI Number Name BuildingPermitMAR 1 2 2008 0 Preliminary Plat or PUD Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone or other: CITY OF FFDF RAL WAY II Applicant's name: C!✓LEB�q-rj b lJ —IT 1272ft c , LAG / CDS Proposed use: CD M A-NC cjC1 *c. — bf-f-tcE 11,-L_t.G ✓ Location(attach map and legal description if necessary): PIWh.l ?Co S t 9 ZS d 6 1 L. f 33'4YeA. i3T't 6'L. s , pi c-,w,L( 33113.0 ✓ Water purveyor information: it / 1. X a. Watei can be provided by service connection only to an existing 1 2 Pt IM (size)water main that is 0 © tj S 1-r ✓feet from the site. N 1 I i>a OR ` X b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of.I F AVvt-trp,.kc t- ell0T/) PeutegD. 0(1) feet of water main to reach the site;and/or (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site;andteiX ' §. (3) Other(describe): V E—Ot el2 ey•--1-ENS-m,J �rr REQ V i . 2. a. The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. OR ❑ b. The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance of a permit or approval.) 3. x a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district,or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city,or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board(BRB)approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. X a. Water is or will be available at the rate of flowy,d duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant ©N 5 c i= feet from the building/property(or as marked on the attached map): Rate of flow at Peak Demand: 0 less than 500 g (a rox. gpm) ❑500 to 999 gpm 1:-.]1000 gpm or more Duration: flow test of �� -gpm El calculation of gpm 0 less than 1 hour ❑1 hour to 2 hours Dir2 hours or more Other. (Note: Commercial building permits which include multifamily structures require flow test or calculation.) OR ❑ b. Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. 5. Rr a. Water system has certificates of water rights or water right claims sufficient to provide service. OR ❑ b. Water system does not currently have necessary water rights or water right claims.. Comments/conditions: i;/JfVeg SERV tce CONNEGTty peU C.f�TIOlos Vt • I certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT ' ''iA/`) kcoTd Agency name Signatogi na e c 7 di i� 7a Title Signature at ( ( 407 r_...........................__._...__.._ C Highest / t Min. f � v. .__ In S3� Pressure Zone; Elevation of Property 3T5/3.2.5 — ;Est. Max. Pressure — psi ' Lowest The District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay or deny water service based upon capacity limitations in District and Other Purveyor facilities. Water availability form Rev. 05-19-2003 Page 1 of 1 b� Web date: 04/26/2007� 1, �... ._ ng RRiy Department of Development and Environmental Services ERU Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton,Washington 98057-5212 For alternate formats, call 206-29p-6600. 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 This certificate provides the Public Health-Seattle&King County Department and the Department of M Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate devgplgfopasals. 11 Do not write in this box ((,,�- j��//�� Number Name MAR 12 2008 Building Permit / ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone or other: CDS «a Applicant's name: C ELE llgA-(•i a tJ -T 2prc LL C ✓ Proposed use: co M r"E c..t *L ciPC(cE '3t_D G. / Location(attach map and legal description if necessary): H>, `7 c ,S('T7 Bo i L, / Ili 33`f 13 L pc_ 1 FE Di cd- ( %/ 33y3o ✓ ill Sewer agency information: 1. �( a. Sewer servicecan be�ovided by side sewer connection only to an existing 8t� Vii4M✓size sewer ` O N S 1 ZE feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. OR ❑ b. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: • ❑ (1) feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; and/or 0 (2) The construction of a collection system on the site; and/or 0 (3) Other(describe): 2. g a. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. OR 0 b. The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. X a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city. OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board(BRB)approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: a. Connection charge: To \ c1-CL LftTE.D . / b. Easement(s): QS QE Q V( ✓ c. Other: -Et_N-1F(t., SEQV L C-tlV 0 -t'p.) F'>=Q.,(.& -r- R--4v l fib. Comments: Li:District,at its sole discretion,reserves the right to delay or deny sewer service based upon capacity limitations in District and Other Purveyor facilities.* ' I certify that the above sewer agency information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT V'2i tvp,) / Sc3 -( Agency name Sig atory name .....:,- 4 1 yec0 7 Title Signature a �z(0 sewer availability form.doc b-cert-sewer.pdf 02-07-2002 Page 1 of 1 : Cirette AssociatesLLc NOLF- ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Prepared by: Grette AssociatesLLC October 24, 2007 Prepared for: Tom Pierson File No.: 883.001 c/o Jon Graves Architects &Planners PLLC 3110 Ruston Way, Ste. D Tacoma, WA 98402 Re: 33430 13th Place- Site Assessment Grette Associates has contracted with Tom Pierson to conduct a stream assessment on a 1.1 acre property located at 33430 13th Place within the City of Federal Way, Washington (Subject Property). The Subject Property is recorded as King County Tax Parcel 7681900010. A stream assessment was requested in a July 20, 2007 letter from Janet Shull, AICP on behalf of the City of Federal Way. According to the letter an existing stream is present within the adjacent parcel to the east of the Subject Property. A City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map (Figure 1) was reviewed prior to the site assessment. According to this map no stream is present on or adjacent to the Subject Property. Figure 1. City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map , CCU C3; SUBJECT PROP RtY I� S 336thf. I4 RECEIVED MAR 12 2008 WENATCHEE TACOMA 509-663-6300 253-573.9300 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Fax 509-664-1882 Fax 253-573-9321 151 5,WORTHEN ST.STE. 101 • WENATCHEE,WA 98801 21 1 1 NORTH 30TH STREET• TACOMA,WA 98403CDS The Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Forest Practices database was consulted to determine if water bodies occur on or in the vicinity of the Subject Property that are previously mapped and classified under the water typing system detailed in WAC 222-16-030 and -031. According to the Water Type Map (Figure 2) no such water bodies are present on or near the Subject Property, Figure 2. WDNR Water Type Map 1 " Ili :I- i k +7-294�J 712942 II +712244 — li ,,, CI if // - Site �— 1 Vic' ity ..„„,,, �--� __, _______i_________________„ 7 1') ..., �[. _1712220 1�1� 1712922 it +712924 . _ I -..�- i Vleyerhaeuser Dam �! cl/ill 11 y: A site assessment was conducted on October 23, 2007 by Grette Associates staff biologist Mike Layes. The entire Subject Property was assessed for streams, wetlands, and other critical areas. None of these areas were observed within the Subject Property during the assessment. A stream was observed off-site within the eastern portion of the adjacent parcel to the east(King County Tax Parcel 7681900020). The stream flows south along the eastern boundary of this parcel and enters a large storm drain within the south eastern corner of the property (Photo 1 and 2). The stream is conveyed underground to an outfall on the south side of South 336 Street,just west of the intersection of 13th Place (Figure 3). This stream is a tributary of Hylebos creek, a fish bearing stream and therefore meets the definition of a City of Federal Way Major Stream. Major Streams require a 100-foot buffer under FWCC 22-1306. However, buffers are only applicable to above ground portions of the stream measured perpendicular to the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). As the stream exists on private property, the OHWM was not flagged in the field. The approximate stream location and 100-foot buffer are sketched over an aerial photograph in Figure 3 below. The 100-foot stream buffer does not appear to extend onto the Subject Property. WENATCHEE TACOMA 509-663-6300 253-573.9300 Fax 509-664-1882 Fax 253-573.9321 151 S.WORTHEN ST.STE. 101 • WENATCHEE,WA 98801 21 1 1 NORTH 30TH STREET• TACOMA,WA 98403 The site assessment was conducted using the best available scientific information and methodologies and the best professional judgment of Grette Associates staff biologists. Final acceptance and approval of the stream assessment is at the discretion of City of Federal Way staff If you have any questions regarding this review please contact me at(253) 573-9300. Sincerely, GRETTE ASSOCIATES, LLC Mike Layes Biologist WENATCHEE TACOMA 509-663-6300 253-573-9300 Fax 509-664-1882 Fax 253-573-9321 151 5.WORTHEN ST.STE. 101 • WENATCHEE,WA 98801 2111 NORTH:30TH STREET• TACOMA,WA 98403 Figure 3. Aerial Photograph with approximate stream location and buffer 1 _ ' • S1 cam ~ ubject Property 1 r' ` `1. +r _SlOrm -. NI* i f Drai « . .iu tte: �I 100 hit-t ju ` 1 r . .° `N.% t '` ^; • �. i• i ..4x I z ! • i ill " t i ti 4 i 1! , 4,,_ , 1 :L. 4:4011tor'ifr .+1J1." ROE . .' � .* n ,. - • i 14111 ' -. ` k '.� ,k : _� • -` +Ntream `. 'r� _ �2D07 D.$c +eryNet,vnrkS * ,, ti >; ?�:; i :2D07 Sanhnrn . k t 5 ; 2007 Tele Atlas . . ,. . r .5 Pointer 47'18'2.4 57" N 22°18'57.19' W elav 331 it Sireaming 11111 11 1 109''. Eye alt 1418`0 F.E tom:;- F ;ti y }t. - +§ ',, „ +qp^ b F 'ti irk d ::7 �.. ; t-or t + s *^-s�„a a. .'2 7_ ' r /M I 4 •4 J t +� __ =zC .a. _ .'} 4 Rey :�t..'1. '1f. .1 t i f� f+`- ....,..0.,.. L� v . . ^Y ., i - -�. ,y.:.,... "'fir Y S . . . Photo 1. Stream, looking north Photo 2. Stream entering storm drain, looking south WENATCHEE TACOMA 509-663-6300 253-573-9300 Fax 509-664-1882 Fax 253-573-9321 151 S.WORTHEN ST.STE. 101 • WENATCHEE,WA 98801 21 1 1 NORTH 30TH STREET• TACOMA,WA 98403 = ., anuany - ' � a� ;1 rh,,. w a .-fir w " P .? ' 3 rft"w ... o ., � , roS� r t r t y .* te„" w S. 7 1 #pw.M, - t - tiYlax m4..„. jj o , ._ _. ***,„ 14—7 o ..._ i , , ,:>,,„.,. -,....,- ) _,..-‘2, . '1 : ... . V , r �1t, lowtt ., . y iirs. -th-Avr•nu * South #r` '. d1 :� E ...,. �< ,,,, ' ,.„ . 'is 7.„4., , p 1 i . -, 4V co :14,.. , 9. „A.i c R o - I A ° i ouch r r 1'3tt•PI^^� � s ). �-y d . ! . ., 7 � a He Hi`hway So Os ._ `r P +k la toil- t,J ( ? ! �_ �twwruhYYS tYlt i y • r 'G7 1 a o._- ` ,,ensG P" ;�; ` � - :�,�tv ' - - .4, ii, 'l'�' LL.... =wt. . T a r, , t e ^.'' 2Gh Avcnur South i , T tw '1i wtr.e i,e. !,44il 4� 3 .r.„.�*R.,,,.. - '#.:- 4:,, ti`"*.�' , `� fir[ i wM �. - �'?C .�;q, 4th A Nnl;f coutn w o _ - ' :.. 'Weyerh. «► ,; ar�y` �.�� t'St • `,,*,` r r + ,- m.== - +� :".i_` s _! .,�?t�,fie. • • RECEIVED MAR 12 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS gyp 'Sr f f • k , V i,` . ij '�F "w i ,k„,, ''..,,„.:.:4t.,:t",.„,„....f.;„w.. ‘-71001-•:, a, „.',,. --,.'' '+'p gaya t' N IE de r J✓f 1FAll'Y T-.t{ `fie F• • .• •• ' ' }, 4.Yr r Y. �' W �,—, g,,t, 0 te I 0* . 'r„ 1 ' .„,-*;*-- -„,,,,A;4;,-:'' 1'17 ., ('•',' . ',,ri,,,"-t ' 9 1:` _ to a ` � � x ,{p fir �- �{.,. ��:1+ 4 $ .w+.. � r .. 4� �.Ya Gs14 y ka t lz c a 'per,d A- , br , o, t z4", r yn.Fx 3•.'.. r.=s'C 1' . F yy • ' r I r - 5n • y,�}rj DIY � p; • , { y LL =Aa. _- ,T. _ a alp {.. .. RECEIVED MAR 12 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS rM CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY O701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400,SEATTLE,WA 98104 Order No.: 001261701 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 33430 15TH PLACE SOUTH Your No.: 33430 13TH PL.S.,FEDERAL WAY,WA FEDERAL WAY,WASHINGTON 98003 CTI/JANN GAY 4717 S 19TH ST STE 109 TACOMA,WASHINGTON 98405 ATTN: JANN GAY 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. TITLE UNIT 6 TELEPHONE:(206)628-5610 FAX:(206)628-9717 TOLL FREE:(800)627-0530 DARYL SAVIDIS SENIOR TITLE OFFICER AND UNIT MANAGER (E-MAIL:DARYL.SAVIDIS@CTT.COM) DAVID P.CAMPBELL SENIOR TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL:DAVID.CAMPBELL@CTT.COM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL:KEITH.EISENBREY@CTT.COM) MELANIE MINOR TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL:MELANIE.MINOR@CTT.COM) <<<<«<<««<<««<<<<<<«<<<<<<«<<<>>»»>>>>>>>>>>»»»»>>>>»»»»» RECEIVED MAR 12 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS TITLETI5/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE,#3400,SEATTLE,WA 98104 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Order No.: 1261701 Title Unit: U-06 Customer Number: 33430 13TH PL. S. , FEDERAL WAY, WA Phone: (206)628-5610 Buyer(s): Fax: (206)628-9717 Officer: SAVIDIS/CAMPBELL/MINOR/EISENBREY Commitment Effective Date: MARCH 4,2008 at 8:00 A.M. 1 . Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $0.00 STANDARD POLICY (6/17/2006) Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Amount: $0.00 EXTENDED POLICY (6/17/2006) Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Amount: $0.00 Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: 2.The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3.Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: CELEBRATION TERRACE, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. The land referred to in this Conunitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT C OMMA805/KLC/11.1.05 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1261701 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) LOT 1 , SECOMA BUSINESS PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 113 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 37 THROUGH 40, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASH INGTON. CLTACMA6/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Order No.: 1261701 Your No.: Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession,or claiming possession,not shown by the Public Records. B. Any encroachment,encumbrance,violation,variation,or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. C. Easements,prescriptive rights,rights-of-way,liens or encumbrances,or claims thereof,not shown by the Public Records. D. Any lien,or right to a lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers' compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the Public Records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the Public Records. F. Any lien for service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity,or construction or similar charges for sewer,water,electricity,natural gas or other utilities,or for garbage collection and disposal not shown by the Public Records. G. Unpatented mining claims,and all rights relating thereto;reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights,claims or title to water. I. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the Public Records,or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW WLTACOMB bk 05/17/07 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 001261701 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PURPOSE: SEWER MAINS AND NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: A NORTHERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH RECORDED: JULY 7, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7507070500 B NOTE: SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. C 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PURPOSE: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM TOGETHER WITH ALL NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH HAVING 5 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF GRANTEE'S FACILITIES AS CONSTRUCTED OR TO BE CONSTRUCTED, EXTENDED OR RELOCATED LYING WITHIN SAID PREMISES RECORDED: APRIL 3, 1980 RECORDING NUMBER: 8004030511 CONTAINS COVENANT PROHIBITING STRUCTURES OVER SAID EASEMENT OR OTHER ACTIVITIES WHICH MIGHT ENDANGER THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. D 3. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, NOTES, DEDICATIONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON SAID PLAT OF SECOMA BUSINESS PARK. CLTACMBI/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1261701 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS E 4. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS AND LIABILITY FOR ASSESSMENTS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW: RECORDED: DECEMBER 26, 1979 RECORDING NUMBER: 7912260134 F 5. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. PRESENT RATE IS 1 .78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. G 6. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1 , SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 2008 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 768190-0010-00 LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 333,200.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 5,166.54 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 5,166.54 H 7. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND HOLDERS OF SECURITY INTERESTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY INSTALLED UPON SAID PROPERTY CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1261701 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. I 8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR CELEBRATION TERRACE, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. J NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. K 9. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY CELEBRATION TERRACE, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. L 10. TITLE IS TO BE VESTED IN PERSONS NOT YET REVEALED AND WHEN SO VESTED WILL BE SUBJECT TO MATTERS DISCLOSED BY A SEARCH OF THE RECORDS AGAINST THEIR NAMES. IA 11 . THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. Q 12. IMPORTANT! ! THIS TRANSACTION HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED FOR INSURANCE AGAINST UNRECORDED LABOR AND MATERIAL LIEN RIGHTS NOR FOR MATTERS THAT COULD BE DISCLOSED BY AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE SURVEY OF THE LAND. YOU MAY NOT CLOSE UNTIL YOU HAVE RECEIVED A SUPPLEMENTAL FROM THE TITLE UNIT ADDRESSING THIS PARAGRAPH! TO PROVIDE AN EXTENDED COVERAGE LENDER'S POLICY GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A THROUGH D WILL BE CONSIDERED WHEN OUR INSPECTION AND/OR REVIEW OF SURVEY, IF REQUIRED, IS COMPLETED. A SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT WILL FOLLOW. N NOTE 1 : EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1 , 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1261701 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S) . GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN) . **A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. ALL PAGES: NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEPARATE PAGE.ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY.FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: LOT 1 , SECOMA BUSINESS PARK, VOLUME 113 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 37 THROUGH 40 END OF SCHEDULE B CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1261701 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS P THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS COMMITMENT: GVA KIDDER, MATHEWS 1201 PACIFIC AVE #1400 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402 MARK CLIREHUGH 1/1 (253)383-5693 CTI/RENEE SORENSEN 4717 S 19TH ST, STE 109 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98405 RENEE SORENSEN 2/1 (253)671-6620 CTI/JANN GAY 4717 S 19TH ST STE 109 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98405 JANN GAY 1/1 (253)671-6661 TOM PIERSON P.O. 502 MILTON, WASHINGTON 98354 1/1 CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 T DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South RECEIVED POBox9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 CITY OF 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 Federal \Alay MAR 1 2 2003 www.cityoffederalway.com CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Checklist Instructions This checklist is designed to assist the project proponent in demonstrating how CPTED principles have been met.This goal can also be met by submitting a written explanation as to how each of the three design principles of Natural Surveillance,Access Control,and Ownership has been met. The checklist has been prepared to provide guidance and assistance in regard to the integration of CPTED principles into proposed project designs. The purpose of the checklist is to assist a project proponent in identifying and incorporating design strategies that implement the CPTED principles identified in Federal Way City Code(FWCC) Section 22-1630. CPTED principles,performance standards, and strategies are used during project development review to identify and incorporate design features, which reduce opportunities for criminal activity to occur. The effectiveness of CPTED is based on the fact that criminals make rational choices about their targets.In general: (1) The greater the risk of being seen,challenged,or caught;the less likely they are to commit a crime. (2) The greater the effort required,the less likely they are to commit a crime. (3) The lesser the actual or perceived rewards,the less likely they are to commit a crime. Through use of CPTED principles,the built environment can be designed and managed to ensure: (1) There is more chance of being seen,challenged,or caught; (2) Greater effort is required; (3) The actual or perceived rewards are less; and (4) Opportunities for criminal activity are minimized. CPTED Design Principles CPTED design principles are functionally grouped into three categories: (1) Natural Surveillance. This category focuses on strategies to design the built environment in a manner that promotes visibility of public spaces and areas. (2) Access Control.This category focuses on the techniques that prevent and/or deter unauthorized and/or inappropriate access. (3) Ownership.This category focuses on strategies to reduce the perception of areas as "ownerless" and therefore available for undesirable uses. Bulletin#021—August 18,2004 Page 1 of 2 k:\Handout\CPTED Instructions How to Use This Checklist This checklist has been prepared to assist in identifying appropriate strategies to incorporate CPTED design principles into proposed projects in Federal Way. The guidelines included in this checklist expand on the principles found in FWCC Section 22-1630. It is recommended that the principles be reviewed initially to identify the approaches used to implement CPTED. Subsequent to this initial review,this checklist should be reviewed to identify additional strategies that may be applicable for a proposed project. Not all strategies are applicable to all projects.In addition,the CPTED principles may be addressed through strategies that are not listed. Checklist Design The checklist has been organized in the following manner: Functional Area Specific design element addressed by CPTED principles Section and 4 Functional Area Evaluation Performance Performance Standard for Agency Performance Standard Standard Use Only What is the desired outcome of Strategy applying CPTED principles to this functional area IN Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Pamir Review Strategy Technique which can be used Sect& 1.0: Natural Surveillance to implement CPTED principles Check Box 1.1 `Blind Corners Conforms Indicate by checking this box ifAvoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. Revise NA this strategy has been used in the proposed project Comments: Strategy Write-in Pathways should be direct. All barriers along This section can be used to write pathways should be permeable(see through) in a strategy which is not including landscaping,fencing etc. specifically listed but is U Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to employed in the project see ahead of them and around corners .e Process Applicability ❑'Other strove 'J— Indicates when in the review process the identified guideline should be assessed Site Plan and Building Permit Review Certain guidelines and techniques are best applied during different points in the review process. To assist in facilitating CPTED review,guidelines which are best considered during site plan review are indicated with a"■" symbol. Guidelines that are most appropriately applied during building permit review are indicated with a"e" symbol. Bulletin#021—August 18,2004 Page 2 of 2 k:\Handout\CPTED Instructions DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South CITY OF PO Box 9718 Fe d e ra I Way FederalWay 98063-9718 253-835-235-2607;Fax Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Checklist Directions Please fill out the checklist to indicate which strategies have been used to implement CPTED principles in your proposed project.Please check all strategies that are applicable to your project for each of the numbered guidelines. You may check more than one strategy for each guideline. Your responses will be evaluated by City Staff, and will be integrated into the Site Plan and/or Building Permit review process. Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy • Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 1.0 Natural Surveillance 1.1 Blind Corners _Conforms Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. _Revise _NA Comments: dPathways should be direct.All barriers along pathways should be permeable(see through)including landscaping,fencing etc. ■ ❑ Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead of them and around corners. e Other strategy used: O 1.2 Site and Building Layout _Conforms Allow natural observation from the street to the use,from the Revise use to the street, and between uses _NA Comments: Bulletin#022—August 18,2004 Page 1 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Orient the main entrance towards the street or both streets on For Non-Single corners. • Family Development ❑ Position habitable rooms with windows at the front of the Iv k dwelling. • Access to dwellings or other uses above commercial/retail development should not be from the rear of the building. ■ ❑ Offset windows,doorways and balconies to allow for natural observation while protecting privacy. • Locate main entrances/exits at the front of the site and in view of the street. ■ For Commercial/ Retail/Industrial If employee entrances must be separated from the main and Community ❑ entrance,they should maximize opportunities for natural Facilities surveillance from the street. • N j pc ❑ In industrial developments,administration/offices should be located at the front of the building. • N r pc Avoid large expanses of parking.Where large expanses of For Surface Lid parking are proposed,provide surveillance such as security Parking and cameras. ■ Parking Structures ,r,/ Access to elevators,stairwells and pedestrian pathways should L��SS be clearly visible from an adjacent parking area. • [2(Avoid hidden recesses. • yLocate parking areas in locations that can be observed by adjoining uses. • Open spaces shall be clearly designated and situated at For Common/ locations that are easily observed by people.Parks,plazas, Open Space ❑ common areas,and playgrounds should be placed in the front Areas of buildings. Shopping centers and other similar uses should face streets. ■ Other strategy used: Bulletin#022—August 18,2004 Page 2 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review 1.3 Common/Open Space Areas and Public On-Site Open __Conforms Space _Revise Provide natural surveillance for common/open space areas. NA Comments: Position active uses or habitable rooms with windows adjacent ❑ to main common/open space areas,e.g.playgrounds, swimming pools,etc.,and public on-site open space. • 1v (� Design and locate dumpster enclosures in a manner which • screens refuse containers but avoids providing opportunities to hide. • Locate waiting areas and external entries to elevators/stairwells ❑ close to areas of active uses to make them visible from the building entry. e o Locate seating in areas of active uses. e Other strategy used: 1.4 Entrances _Conforms Provide entries that are clearly visible. _Revise _NA Comments: 5( Design entrances to allow users to see into them before entering. • Entrances should be clearly identified(Signs must conform to ❑ FWCC Section 22-1569(D).Permit Exceptions.(Applicable during Certificate of Occupancy Inspection). Other strategy used: 1.5 Fencing _Conforms Fence design should maximize natural surveillance from the _Revise street to the building and from the building to the street, and _NA minimize opportunities for intruders to hide. Comments: Bulletin#022—August 18,2004 Page 3 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Front fences should be predominantly open in design,e.g. pickets or wrought iron,or low in height. e 1i Design high solid front fences in a manner that incorporates ❑ open elements to allow visibility above the height of five feet. e If noise insulation is required,install double-glazing at the ❑ front of the building rather than solid fences higher than five feet. e Other strategy used: O 1.6 Landscaping ,Conforms Avoid landscaping which obstructs natural surveillance and _Revise allows intruders to hide. TNA Comments: dTrees with dense low growth foliage should be spaced or their crown should be raised to avoid a continuous barrier. • Use low groundcover,shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height,or high-canopied trees(clean trimmed to a height of eight feet)around children's play areas,parking areas,and along pedestrian pathways. ■ iAvoid vegetation that conceals the building entrance from the street. ■ Other strategy used: 0 1.7 Exterior Lighting _Conforms Provide exterior lighting that enhances natural surveillance. _Revise (Refer to FWCC Section 22-1635(g)(1)for specific lighting _NA requirements.) Comments: Prepare a lighting plan in accordance with Illuminating �/ Engineering Society of America(IESA)Standards,which LDS addresses project lighting in a comprehensive manner.Select a lighting approach that is consistent with local conditions and crime problems. ■ Bulletin#022—August 18,2004 Page 4 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Locate elevated light fixtures(poles,light standards,etc.)in a Eisi coordinated manner that provides the desired coverage.The useful ground coverage of an elevated light fixture is roughly twice its height. ■ For areas intended to be used at night,ensure that lighting ❑ supports visibility.Where lighting is placed at a lower height to support visibility for pedestrians,ensure that it is vandal- resistant. e ❑ Ensure inset or modulated spaces on a building facade, access/egress routes,and signage is well lit. e ❑ In areas used by pedestrians,ensure that lighting shines on pedestrian pathways and possible entrapment spaces. e Place lighting to take into account vegetation,in its current and ❑ mature form,as well as any other element that may have the potential for blocking light. e Avoid lighting of areas not intended for nighttime use to avoid ❑ giving a false impression of use or safety.If danger spots are usually vacant at night,avoid lighting them and close them off to pedestrians. e 21 Select and light"safe routes"so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity after dark. ■ ❑ Avoid climbing opportunities by locating light standards and electrical equipment away from walls or low buildings. e ❑ Use photoelectric rather than time switches for exterior lighting. e In projects that will be used primarily by older people ❑ (retirement homes,congregate care facilities,senior and/or community centers,etc.)provide higher levels of brightness in public/common areas. e Other strategy used: CI 1.8 Mix of Uses _Conforms In mixed use buildings increase opportunities for natural _Revise surveillance,while protecting privacy. _NA Comments: Bulletin#022—August 18,2004 Page 5 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy • Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Where allowed by city code,locate shops and businesses on lower floors and residences on upper floors.In this way, ❑ residents can observe the businesses after hours while the residences can be observed by the businesses during business hours. ■ ❑ Include food kiosks,restaurants,etc.within parks and parking structures. ■ Other strategy:used El 1.9 Security Bars,Shutters,and Doors _Conforms When used and permitted by building and fire codes, security _Revise bars,shutters, and doors should allow observation of the street _NA and be consistent with the architectural style of the building. Comments: ❑ Security bars and security doors should be visually permeable (see-through). e Other strategy used: El Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 2.0 Access Control 2.1 Building Identification _Conforms Ensure buildings are clearly identified by street number to Revise prevent unintended access and to assist persons trying to find _NA the building.Identification signs must conform to FWCC, Comments: Section 22-1569(D).Permit Exceptions. ❑ Street numbers should be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. e Bulletin#022—August 18,2004 Page 6 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy • Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review In residential uses,each individual unit should be clearly numbered.In multiple building complexes,each building entry ❑ should clearly state the unit numbers accessed from than entry. In addition,unit numbers should be provided on each level or floor. e ❑ Street numbers should be made of durable materials,preferably reflective or luminous,and unobstructed(e.g.by foliage). e For larger projects,provide location maps(fixed plaque ❑ format)and directional signage at public entry points and along internal public routes of travel. e Other strategy used: 2.2 Entrances _Conforms Avoid confusion in locating building entrances. _Revise _NA Comments: �.,/Entrances should be easily recognizable through design Ltd features and directional signage.(Signs must conform to FWCC Section 22-1569(D).Permit Exceptions. • ▪ Minimize the number of entry points. • Other strategy used: El 2.3 Landscaping _Conforms Use vegetation as barriers to deter unauthorized access. ._Revise _NA Comments: ❑ Consider using thorny plants as an effective barrier. e Other strategy used: 2.4 Landscaping Location _Conforms Avoid placement of vegetation that would enable access to a _Revise building or to neighboring buildings. _NA Comments: Bulletin#022—August 18,2004 Page 7 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy • Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review / Avoid placement of large trees,garages,utility structures, fences,and gutters next to second story windows or balconies that could provide a means of access. ■ Other strategy used: 2.5 Security _Conforms Reduce opportunities for unauthorized access _Revise _NA Comments: Consider the use of security hardware and/or human measures ❑ to reduce opportunities for unauthorized access_(Applicable during Certificate of Occupancy Inspection). Other strategy used: 2.6 Signage _Conforms Insure that signage is clearly visible,easy to read and simple to _Revise understand[Signs must conform to FWCC Section 22-1569(D). _NA' Permit Exceptions]. Comments: ❑ Use strong colors,standard symbols,and simple graphics for informational signs. e Upon entering the parking area,provide both pedestrians and For Surface ❑ drivers with a clear understanding of the direction to stairs, Parking and elevators,and exits. e Parking Structures In multi-level parking areas,use creative signage to distinguish ❑ between floors to enable users to easily locate their cars. e ❑ Advise users of security measures that are in place and where to find them,i.e. security phone or intercom system. e ❑ Provide signage in the parking area advising users to lock their cars. e Bulletin#022—August 18,2004 Page 8 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Where exits are closed after hours,ensure this information is indicated at the parking area entrance. e Other strategy used: Section 3.0 Ownership 3.1 Maintenance _Conforms Create a"cared for"image _Revise _NA Comments: Ensure that landscaping is well maintained,as per FWCC ❑ Section 22-1569,in order to give an impression of ownership, care,and security.(Ongoing). Where possible,design multi-unit residential uses such that no ❑ more than sixto eight units share a common building entrance. • 'v Other strateg used: El 3.2 Materials _Conforms Use materials, which reduce the opportunity for vandalism. _Revise _NA Comments: Consider using strong,wear resistant laminate,impervious glazed ceramics,treated masonry products,stainless steel ❑ materials,anti-graffiti paints,and clear over sprays to reduce opportunities for vandalism.Avoid flat or porous finishes in areas where graffiti is likely to be a problem. e ❑ Where large walls are unavoidable,refer to FWCC Section 22- 1564(u)regarding the use of vegetative screens. e Common area and/or street furniture shall be made of long ❑ wearing vandal resistant materials and secured by sturdy anchor points,or removed after hours. e Other strategy used: Bulletin#022—August 18,2004 Page 9 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED Environmental Services ❑Geotechnical Engineering ❑Construction Materials Testing LI Special Inspections January 3, 2008 • Mr. Tom Pierson Celebration Terrace, LLC P.O. Box 502 Milton, Washington 98354 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY UPDATE CEDARS REDESIGN SHELL AND CORE 33430 13TH PLACE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Project No. E-9967-1 Reference: Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study E-9967, December 26, 2001. Dear Mr. Pierson: As requested, Earth Consulting Incorporated (ECI) is pleased to present this letter updating the geotechnical engineering study for the proposed building located at 33430 13th Place South in Federal Way, Washington. We previously prepared the referenced geotechnical engineering study for the site. In preparing for this update, we reviewed the referenced study, project plans, and visited the site to observe existing conditions. Project Description We understand it is proposed to develop the site with a new commercial building. Based on information provided, the building will consist of one partially below-grade story and two above-grade stories. The building will be situated in the middle of the site with paved parking and access roads around the building. Based on our site visit, the site has remained unchanged since the time MAR 12 2008 cl!-- OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 1805 136th Place Northeast#201 • Bellevue,WA 98005 • (425)643-3780 • Fax(425)746-0860 eci©eci-mti.com • www.eci-mti.corn S 1 • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY UPDATE E-9967-1 January3,2008 Discussion and Recommendations In our opinion, the recommendations presented in the referenced study are still applicable and may continue to be used for this project. Based on our review of the project plans and the referenced study, the proposed excavation for the building may extend below the maximum depth of our explorations. Based on the soil conditions encountered in our explorations, the site soils become denser with increased depth. We anticipate suitable soils will be encountered at subgrade elevations for the building however, ECI should be requested on site to observe foundation subgrade conditions as they are exposed. Since the referenced study was prepared, the City of Federal Way has adopted the International Building Code (IBC). The IBC seismic design section provides a series of soil types that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that Site Class C, "Very dense soil and soft rock" from Table 1615.1.1, should be used for design. In accordance with section 1615.1.2 site seismic coefficients are S. = 1.22 and Smi = 0.56 We trust this information meets your needs. If you have any questions, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED ,T. -.4 `_ u c `0..144-ifef....xfAe () 7 I f TS Steve J. Scharf, L Kristina M. Weller, PE Senior Staff Geologist Principal SJS/KMW/skp EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED Page 2 • ._ • . , . , • . . . , - ,...... +`. ..;.,.. .. . ..- , .. . . . . - . ._,.. „. • . . AL ENGINEERING STUDY Is:., .., "....','...2..-..1 ;:..- ••1 ,•,, '''...-•;;,,•,•. ,; ..., •--.:•••--- • '....::"'GEDTPkIP.41 -,,, „••-••-••;,.---;,;-•,,u,;,-;•7:601-1ANG:-.,-. . •-, -...-,-..-....r.... ....... ',„_:::_-:-... ' ,-,.,,,,..........-... ,.. ‘• ....I .. . •5•.••'• -,-..• , --, . ....... •: - ... _:': — •••• PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL , ,,,,...,..,,...„„:--,,I.---,.:••, --,-,.--.,:,.=--, ,-..,•::•:.' ---. • •- ---,,, ....-:.---. ...:-,:2_,, TH ..-:i.-.; ••:-•::: :-.' ' '..;;•-•_•-• -'-.•:•.',•---- ,,-.:,.',:.,.:;‘,:-...;-.'.-. .2.• iiiikAAL--w.Ayi:•W.4§11!N97:9N.-;•-::.•"-...::;.--.-:: .•,.,_:• ..,-,-,•., .':---, •,;':'.---:-•.r.,:-..':-.•-•••••.,;:;......,.: ,;.,..........• •••:: - i--s•-•: ...-.,..„•-.?...,'•-•,‘•-•:•_:•-..,....-•' ",•,..:•-•,,.:•.,:,-..., ,..-..-:-.-:-.....---., --,-,:,...._:••.,..:.;-:.:::i-;-1,,,,-2-?.:::?.„-.',.,:;'::-..,2;-;•••';',„::-.: .;::". .:.-I,,,;;,..},j:;',"•,'2.:.:_•':::::.:•-.%,:=;',11..-';[,'":.(-.. :-.....,'..:.--^.'''•••••,-,-,..., .-.,-:'.:.,*-2%.,-;,...,',-:: •.:•‘•••.••',:;•••-, --1 1,:-.• '•..-:',.. •:...‘:',..•1 •.:-::/..,. ''...':.:,-,..',1:.:•::-.: ••••::',,••.'2L. ...',-,:•%:....-..,-•--..:•-•.'•.--z-:-.:';;:.--:--•...,::::'.;-'.`'...-.1-.,:.:A.-'::::-.,!•.;‘,.);;:,,,..::7Z-,...:'..•?:,:- .,','-.,;-•; ' -'••,_. --. .---..-: '.,•••..:',. '-' Ir.-„ - •''',', ',.•‘•..,,--..... . -..?:''J ..1...,• ::',.1.....:::,;•••;-:.. ''',••:..........(••••;',.!...;•••-•:,'::-•`• '•,•''''''•: ',.--::-•:::',...‘. ..:• ''''-,-' --'._:-;•.,:_,,.,..,.:-..,-, ';,-.:;',:,.,„1,.,1,-....: .-:,-; "A!,,,,-„,:.'.„•:::.‘. ,..-... ' -._•:-: '..,,•,--...-;-,-,....'',;•,--_-`-,_.:2„, ..-,,:. ;i ::";.,.',_ •'..•::.•,',.•''''., ','C'f':-.....-;1:: '....:-..---: ..,1,....:....'*::•':,,,,:::•-••••‘ -..••:'-_,::-: ' :'• ..--:---• •."-‘7.-,..•.-....' ..;:‘,.' .,.•,--;\ ''‘-. ..,..••- -...,•-•:;:.t• '..1.2i--, EL9967- --:;•-•-..:.---••_:::-;-,,,.^----. ::.---:-.,...2.'• ,';-• ' ....'-'-'•:....•-"!--,',-.:•:,•,•,-.;,-•.':,-.',...--2-..-s.,--; .';'..,, :•-•'-'•• ':,'..---.."':-..:; -.;-;.•. '.-••• .••..,; •-.--,-, ...-,:-.: .-..',...,:•:-.-.•-:•-- ...,. - .,•_-..-; .,;$,-;•::.,..,.;-,-2,,,,,..;-:,,,:..-•;;',:-...,-...„,,--:2::::;..",...,,, ,-,-,,:-:;..--.1,'.-.,-3.:-.-••••.,;: .•••:.:•-•: •.'•-•! ".. ••;•.....;2.,,,•-,•,•-•;.'...2••••••:c- --.-_ .,.., ,.. ,„,:;:-......;-.,.; • '.-21,, ,.."',... -....._-•• •„-,•'.:2: '..2,, -,‘,._ ; -., :•..••.:- ,,-,.y:,..,.-:.• .-.‘• ....S. -,--..--,''''..,-;:-::.,-:;:!--. .,.- ::-..'• •-,::„.':-....-,..:.•,-.•,-.-,:..--,:-.:•••-....-:;,:--,....‘:.::•---,:, .....,*, „•--......,',, :-.,-: :-,-,•;,......-.„ - ,1_,........;,••; ••,.,..-,,..•-; ,.. . . , . ..- •••,...,• :,.. ..,: •-...; ..-.: .. .--•..-••:-....:.-...-_-, -:,:,-• • _ ... .-: -..,•- ,. • s..,-.- -•-.-„-, •-• ,:•,„ :-:‘. ..i2.::::-_," : •-•,-----;. '..-•-:•`-•,-„,.......,i, ',:• "'.,,,,.,,-.•,,...1,••••••••••• ‘. . -., - •--; •-•:, -• .:•-•- .: -• • - ,..• •-• ' ‘," ;'•,-' i',..1,•,•.• .. . .. ,- :;..,,-:..,••• • -:,•: ,:,----;•:-:,..:-•:-:-"'--• - - ' •- - ----pecember-26f••2001.'•:•-,- ':• --. 2 ,-•.:••-•••;:.... • •---•, -,'•::::----.•'=;:-.••.;,--;-.,:-..,:r-•.••••,--:•.-.•-•••::•. •••:-.',. •:',..',".•••:........;.,:,..1',:,...',,.'-,,,...,:‘,':-....:,'... .."'''..;'•:.2- .••••'•;;;:-:.:-,_•' :",•-‘•••'--.-•-•,,:-. ....-.....:-•',,-.•,..,z.-:. ::••••,,;;;;:, ,,-..,;:.:'-...-:•-••::;;;I::-..-„,:::-y.,';',-:;:..._:,---. 1••,---.-,'","•‘•-,..'s--s, '::::::-..:•,_.:•-:-,.;' ,,'.---,‘-.‘"•?:;-.--.:::: •:::,,-""•:::•-..,-,.'', `•'-;-,',-!::•;-,,,,..:f...•;';..:;...... -.2-,.:4:":::•;;;•;-,- -••,....=-;:=‘,.s„..,:;;.•,•., .'„,.-•:-.;•;...-.:-:,;;•,_-.:-,-,:;.-='-.---;:''...-. ,..,.'..: '':..f.--r, . - PREPARED FOR -- --ii-- :-,TRADEMARK ..-•",-,,•;;•.,,.. -.:‘•;•;•, : ,•,'.;•-•,••:.,.._ . :,-::•,..'",•:-:•ir,--2*.-,•"•-• '..:-. '-'1.-.'•''''''..-•‘•••' •-•'::1•‘• ' '2••••":;.--''''.'—2"•' : `--- '''''' ' --'•"•'' ';:'•' CORPORATION' ,:,,,,,-.:•,-...--,: :- ....•-•,•-••,....-;:2::.:,:-.,:‘... ...--,• --, --;,•-•.-•,..,--,,••,...........:-...?...:.:•-.- `•,•,,,:,,,...-•.:-•,•:--? ,.• -,..•••,2-:-;-‘1':-•;,-:.-••---. :,. .',..-...-_,..-,.•••;.:;-.,•,-.2 •:::•....-_-:-. -...-,-.--.::-..., •,•;:-..,..;,'•',-... .,-,.._•,-,-.:--...• -:-.,'-90:Att-•.---„..- ‘;...:',....••.. '-.-"...‘2,..::::.••-".:,•:'...:',;-•:':•-:.,i.!.'•••:-:•,-„";........:1„...-2;'•'•::•::••••••.,.......:;:',';',..':'.;`,-••: • • ,..:...: ••.•••,••'.-..::-:-.-, .--..•-,, •:. ..•••";-•.-.,--,....•-•,-,•-•--' -, -r.,•-•;--....,-.- ••••••-:••••:. •':-:-. -;••• •,.:40,..-ovi:•.-1414Pe.4.;-•..‹: •••4.;;:•'•••-'.•--n -:•••::.,,,•‘,•-:,-,..•-,_, :•,.,.-.,.,-,-‘•:::..-_:-...:,-'.. : •,,, ...:.7.-T-•;-,:•.;:,,.;?,....•-•-:;-:•...":,::::•::,....:.•..•••••-, ,,;......,!..,.............,:-.....;;;.;•.....: :...,.....:-.:-..:_,,....:..-:.;2•-•-•-...„-,...-_-. :;-....,:::•-‘,-,.2:'•;:.,.: -:,-.,:•,-..:;,.",•;:::',.:-'.,,....:....4";,i;41,., 1,--. .--_,- ,---.,:.,:4;fae,.... . „:..,....i):4/6/...::::,,. ..::-. ,....., ...-, „--_, . .„,.,...:‘,.:,...:,-..,:,.......,- ,,....,;.:::,:::,-„,:....,;;,........ • . .'-'......-7'-:::-g '''.r:Ir.811-*Atittiolikt .:=.769.1:-.,...:'-'-:-.C.; '•-•.,- ..-'L.'- ''''-'•:' .''''':'''' '.•':''I..;,-;••.:::%.*:::?:';::•;:j....... ...':', .:.'...,..•••1:..-'...''.:,.C:::-:::::.;':::.,;•:;. !.,--'';'„'..'-..: -':::,..::,-.,;:' 1,:,,;:-...::•...,.•-:',' -::::".":::,•f;:'.:.7::::',-2-2:'-f44 r. ",,, ‘. :natief::,:,:', .-:::;"•::. ':-.,.'..‘::::: ::::.,2. 1Exp4R , ..;:.--, ,,•'..,.. .:''I...1'..'..•:::::::.-;.::-•,,..'. ..:::::,.-...:..2.'"''..:.::,..r'...:!:. ' • '• ''' ' — ,,az.09„6 .•,•,. 1.. - , ..,•••.• -, •• .-,..,-, .., •....;.,- .•,,••, ,,..;,•:....- ..--, •..„,- ..,::. .....i ,.,, ,. ,-.,...::-..,:i-i ,...::...v:,,-.,......:•,.•,,, ,,--...., ,-,.....,..,:-:-,.-•...,.,:-:,•-;-,-;-_;.: .: • :.• - 4. .,,• •.,_._ .....-... .,•-• •_ „;. •,.......-•::. :;.•,. •,- , ,.,„ . , „:„•-•• •• •. ,...,,.•-,.-.,.............,:.::.•. ..-:..:-;, i-•••:„....s2.:..-,:-.::'::....;,,,.':,..;.r.:.1...:',....:.'"A„;' ,z1-;:s:';'‘..,:.:;•::•-..-'-•'-•;"...''.,....--...' -•_.-'.:,.,3-:::;',-.,-..:-•''..' :.:'---,..; •, --7..f...'•,•..':--•.:.-.,-.-.---• r'.....-''--•_;, •••.•.'"'••! :1--.::' '.•!-':-.; :,:.:';',.. •:: '.'1,•..::‘;•':',":,...::-..1::'..."- --::--:•.;.•-.. •,..,'1,•''''. ..'.•:,..'••• .:.."2•:.'•,••• .. -•.; •' - 7_. ...."-•...•... -'••;.- '..2. ---,''.'. ::. . ."....... .-..:,-. .;••'''. •-,:.:'',Z.7: ..'..-.._'., '•.:',......::'....-:-..?1_,....: -•!.:‘:'' .:. , :-....•••....-.':::'.'- ';'-' _;:•.'.. ,...•::•".i.,-.;;;•''.:•. -1 ' • • - ;•:..1_,... .,;.:',':'. .:-"•::.• ,....A, ., ';',;,,...' ‘:-;‘, .--...':,,,.. ..'.....":.':.2:.'.'. ,.' , , , ''„', . .::-.-.. ‘,..''.-.--.'. ::;",',.'..:.::;.:.';''.''''.. r. ,.., u .- .....:,'''....:' . ' .‘,-,''.-- .',2-;...' .:::.."::•'....• !':''' ...,.:::5.::.! .......,....,..:::::;:'::::: .-: :-v.: .:,.,:-:-:.,......1 ..,.:..:,-k, ..,::".. '' .•,:::-.....:,•.7-2". ,1:.:".', ''.:-:,;;;.;`f..--‘,. •.-:-- • - ••‘ .....; 1 ....-.-;,:•.„:.......,;•,,:.:H'.,',,,-; •'',..,..,:,..,::::.••: '' - ..':: •-.•::::•.. Kyle R. Campbell. PE. ,.,;:i i.....,..,•:-,1:,., . .., -.. '2',:•;,..:.., .,:,-.:,.:' ... ',,•;',„: ':',.. -. ;_•. .'-'•.--. .. •';',' PrincoRI:•,--,...,.....-,..,..--:••.,. :.•,,; - • ••‘.--‘•• .-;••.-.' • '••••.: :-.. r:: •;•... -,•...,.'....:.::.":••• •,.-) ..:.• .••,',.,.-.•;:„......,..::::•.•;. ..::-...s•;,.....:::.,;•.,•••,•.,...--•.,•..--•;,,\ • . -...•-.• -',' • ,••:••...::''•!,.1..J-...-.;.•',.,.'.',:•'••,,•,,s.,';:.I.;,•••'..;,.'.:-.::*:',.,'..-•..,-•::':•...'-•:•-•,:-':•-'•.'•',--.•.."'•','.,:••-•,;..•..-; ‘•;;-"-•,...;-:......-••.•.'.1...:.,-.-'--,....- ,•-,':;-,.-..'•..••-:-•-:,-.•..---•2.--'2••',-'-.--'....-'.,''-'.--.'.:;. E.ar.4th Consultants,••--.....-..:.-.. ' IPPP 7• ,4a4 ,.61ai.-00itheast,-o..-u-..„‘•••••e. ,-,.".,• 1...-:1 Bellevue Washing49-98665 ...-••,-,-.-.::-'.,;:.......,.,.‘.:•,.':'•,::,."',:...•.:"....:.'','.'..:.'•:...'.,,..'.".,,..••:.:..;..:,"..........:.:Y-••••'..'..-:.,..;;•':.'-'.'..„';::.-';.-:.2'-'''•',.:.:,...;.,.:.:.....:.:.I::.;2•,-.'...;.,•••--:-;':,••:!•..!;':•:•':.•-•-,.•:.'-„:•.,...-....• -,,..-,-.••••••••:-;,. -- ' ,•••• :. i i., ::..::•."......, .•,:.. -.‘ , •!. •••......',..,,,;,,,.;•.:: :.;:. ; 1.....,';1 :'•.•'•;•.".".,-,.';!:;,''.....-!.:.'.,•-•:.-.... •• ::.-.,;'.-.::;'...,••••.:f...,...,,--.;-..'-'.•.•‘''.-:.-.,-,-••- ....:..,-.1,‘ii-nee 71.8887739r7.,•0 ..•,.,:•.--„: •:...-••• •,::',..,,.. '•:.:.`•.f,-,.•• ••:;'.';. ......',,,,'...••'..'.;..-',..:'.:::•••.•,:'., :...::::.•••.,...:::: ;.,...:;;;,.. ...!:. :,....;;;;;,..-:...;„•;:...••••::::.:::•.,..,..:;•••.,.,,,:•, ;:,•;:•;.-: ,,,::-..;.-,-;•.,,".....-,:•,•-• ,. ...: •.- ••:,1,......-.-:"..; '...........:•.;=;;:--: •'-:;.', .•:-.. .--...,:;2.-•••.....2......1::::-:...;-,-,-,,X'.•". '....2.:••':.;...:;.: •.''.. :**,,;".....:,;:..:•,.....::::.:!.-:•n.',:.:....',.:'.,•i•:•3'..,•;.;-•':;;•..:,•;:,,:'':',::';.‘;:...:. ,,.:,:i :;.:•,":1,,,,,,,......:i•:•::•:•::•,::,...;;:•.:•::•: .::•:: ,,,. '.;:•!••:••;::,......,.•....:. . .........' ••;'-‘'.:._,..-;.: ..-;.;:: ....::, .,''• •.•.-....2::•."-•2•-.s.,. :•.••:;,;::: ,. -::-..:-.:' „. .. -• •.;••••.-:-..',.••,'-•:',,;:. :J.-',..,;;.•••,.....'..t,:',.;.",::,.:'..-.3I.:::.....::r.',',....'f.-.*:-f'....:;.•::••:;•.;'I.:I.'''. ..,,;?,,;.. ..;::::';',:•-.'„:•'. ..'••:•,;•'''.:: :,•'''.•'.',. '....:•:• :•-•::•::;;.-••: ;;;; :.,''•-•• • -:.•:,........,•:-"...;:,-.-••:•;•',.." •,.: ,;-••••:,.. ...-....,;;;:•:;••••••••,.,';-,.••••--.....::. '...:•;••::.'.,•;:,..: •-:•, .'.....,::..,.„'....,;',.'.:.....s.':.•,[;•.••...-.::•••• '.....:".::::- :::••••:',..'•-•:..'• 7...'. ;,'..::.'•::•:::::::;...[....•••.::•.•;••;:•;...:.........;:•-••.-,:-....-•-•-2, .. ..'...-.',":•:..2.-.;:••••,:;i: ''....-;‘,...• .••-..,1...:".•:;..;;,•!..:;•,:.;,_,,...1.::-...-, ',••-•••••-, ...-2.• ,.;-.-:--.2 • :•; ;.. :•:„:•'....:,:',...:•••••.;:.:•.•;••:,:.:...,•.:.''' :,..,:‘„,.........:•,,,:.•;.,.,:,..::......••.;;•• '...:-..,.:••••:.:;•!,::.‘.........;.••.;,.,;. ..,.--.,;'•••;;':..,•:'•-••-..•:•.,-,...,:-...:.:•:,;:•••',..•:-.:. .. -•:... .•••••.,.;.:: ...;',:••.' "..,....... ;;.•:.-.; ,; ••-•.:•,: ..,,•;-;:,.. -.: --,, •- •_-....•,--,.....•;:,:„;• :....-....•,:,::.;;•••••••::.•:.;••• ••,•••...:,;.••••-7:•''''.,r,".',..;;.',.,........-. :,',.......•,•••:••:,•::.•-;;.;:;•..,.--•:',,::c IMruRTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor.As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions,their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be,their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years,due in tion design.Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified,and no subsurface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive,can reveal what is hidden by The following suggestions and observations are offered earth,rock and time.The actual interface between mate- to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can indicates.Actual conditions in areas not sampled may occur during a construction project. differ from predictions.Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated.but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason,most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage,to iden- tify variances,conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed,and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of project-specific factors.These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved,its size and CAN CHANGE configuration;the location of the structure on the site Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- and its orientation; physical concomitants such as changing natural forces.Because a geotechnical engi- access roads, parking lots,and underground utilities, veering report is based on conditions which existed at and the level of additional risk which the dient assumed the time of subsurface exploration,construction decisions by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose program. To help avoid costly problems,consult the geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- technical consultant to learn if additional tests are which change subsequent to the date of the report may advisable before construction starts. affect its recommendations. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods,earthquakes or ground- be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions • •When the nature of the proposed structure is and,thus,the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical changed, for example,if an office building will be report.The geotechnical engineer should be kept erected instead of a parking garage,or if a refriger- apprised of any such events,and should be consulted to • ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary. frigerated one; •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified; •when there is a change of ownership,or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet • •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals.A report pre- Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems , pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor,or even some other • ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer.Unless indicated otherwise, • this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the dient.Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the client ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No Indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken,when engineer.No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring • sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. /Ps '4 . 44\ I Earth Consultants Inc. 1tOki Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists StEnvironmental Sc entists December 26, 2001 E-9967 Trademark Corporation 2000 — 124th Avenue Northeast Bellevue, Washington 98005 Attention: Mr. Steve Willard ,..Dear Mr. Willard: We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Professional Building, 33430 — 13th Place South, Federal Way, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our December 6, 2001 proposal. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the project can be constructed generally as planned. Building support may be provided using conventional spread and continuous foundation systems bearing on competent native soils or on structural fill used to modify site grades. Slab-on-grade floors may be similarly supported. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Kristina M. Weiler, P.E. Project Manager KMW/KRC/lmp 1805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(425)643-3780 FAX(425)746-0860 Toll Free(888)739-6670 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-9967 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 1 Surface 1 Subsurface 2 Groundwater 2 Laboratory Testing 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 4 Foundations 5 Retaining and Foundation Walls 7 Slab-on-Grade Floors 7 Seismic Design Considerations 8 Excavations and Slopes 8 Site Drainage 9 Utility Support and Backfill 10 Pavement Areas 11 LIMITATIONS 11 Additional Services 12 Earth Consultants,Ina. TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued E-9967 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail Plate 4 Utility Trench Backfill APPEN DICES Appendix A Field Exploration Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A7 Test Pit Logs Appendix B Laboratory Test Results Plate B1 Grain Size Analyses Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 33430 - 13TH PLACE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON E-9967 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed Professional Building in Federal Way, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and based on the conditions encountered to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. Project Description We understand it is planned to develop the site with a one story professional building with asphalt-surfaced parking. At the time our study was performed, the site, proposed building locations, and our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The proposed development will include asphalt-surfaced parking and driveway areas. We anticipate traffic will consist of passenger vehicles and occasional service and delivery trucks. If the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site is located at 33430 - 13th Place South (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The site is approximately rectangular in shape, extending about 200 feet in the east-west direction and 238 feet in the north-south direction. The site is bordered on the west by 13th Place South, on the east by forested, undeveloped property and on the north and south by existing office buildings. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 2 An existing slab and foundations from a previous building and asphalt paving currently occupy the site. The site topography slopes down gently from the north to the south with about ten feet of elevation change across the site. Subsurface Subsurface conditions were evaluated by excavating six test pits at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pit Logs, Plates A2 through A7, for a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. Our test pits indicate the landscaped areas of the site are immediately underlain by a four inch thick layer of topsoil and rootmass. This soil unit is characterized by its brown to black color and the presence of organic material. This soil layer is not considered suitable for use in support of foundations, slabs-on-grade, or pavements. In addition, it is not suitable for use as a structural fill, nor should it be mixed with material to be used as structural fill. Underlying the topsoil in Test Pit TP-2 on the landscaping berm on the east side of the site and Test Pit TP-6 in the landscaping on the northwest corner of the existing slab, we encountered about two to three feet of fill. The fill consisted of silty sand with gravel (Unified Classification SM). This soil unit may be suitable for use as structural fill. The native soil consists of two to four feet of medium dense silty sand with gravel underlain by very dense silty sand with gravel. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was not encountered in our test pits. The contractor should be made aware that groundwater is not static. There will be fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 3 Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgment. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed development can be constructed generally as planned. Building support may be provided using conventional spread and continuous foundation systems bearing on competent native soils or on structural fill used to modify site grades. Slab-on-grade floors may be similarly supported. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Trademark Corporation and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 4 Site Preparation and General Earthwork Based on the preliminary site plan, it appears site grading will consist of grading the site to provide a level building pad, installing underground utilities, grading the parking areas and constructing Keystone walls on the north side of the building. We can provide a design for the Keystone walls once the heights have been finalized. The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of foundations, slabs, existing pavements, surface vegetation, organic matter, and other deleterious material. Existing utility pipes to be abandoned should be plugged or removed so that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and stability problems. Based on the thickness of the topsoil layer, encountered at our test pit locations, we estimate a stripping depth of four inches. Stripped materials should not be mixed with materials to be used as structural fill. Following the stripping, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, or slabs are to be placed should be observed by a representative of ECI. Proofrolling may be necessary in order to identify soft or unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Soil in loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill. The optional use of a geotextile fabric placed directly on the overexcavated surface may help to bridge unstable areas. The soils encountered during the site exploration are moisture sensitive due to their high fines content. As such, in an exposed condition, they will become disturbed from normal construction activity, especially when in a wet or saturated condition. Once disturbed, in a wet condition, they will be unsuitable for support of foundations, slabs, or pavements. Therefore, during construction where these soils are exposed and will support new structures, care must be exercised not to disturb their condition. Consideration should be given to placement of rock or other methods to protect exposed native, undisturbed soils that will support foundations or new structural fill. If disturbed conditions develop, the affected soils must be removed and replaced with structural fill. The depth of removal will be dependent on the level of disturbance developed during construction. Given the above, a summer earthwork schedule is recommended. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 5 Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near their optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. During dry weather, most soils which are compactible and non-organic can be used as structural fill. Based on the results of our laboratory tests, the soil at the time of our exploration appears to near to slightly over the optimum moisture content and should be suitable for use as structural fill, provided the grading operations are conducted during dry weather and the soil can be moisture conditioned. Based on laboratory testing, the native soil has between 19 and 26 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. Soil with fines in this range will degrade if exposed to excessive moisture, and compaction and grading will be difficult if the soil moisture increases significantly above its optimum condition. if the native soil is exposed to moisture and cannot be compacted then it may be necessary to import a soil which can be compacted. During dry weather, most non- organic compactible soil with a maximum particle size of six inches can be used. Fill for use during wet weather should consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum particle size of six inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. A contingency in the earthwork budget should be included for this possibility. Foundations Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed building may be supported on a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation bearing on competent native soil or on structural fill used to modify site grades. For frost protection considerations, exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas, where interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches. Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 6 With foundation support obtained as described, for design, an allowable bearing capacity of two thousand five hundred (2,500) pounds per square foot (psf) for structural fill or competent native soil can be used. The allowable bearing capacity may be increased to six thousand (6,000) psf for foundations supported on the very dense silty sand with gravel encountered at three to five feet below the existing ground surface. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Loading of this magnitude would be provided with a theoretical factor-of-safety in excess of three against actual shear failure. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a one-third increase in the above allowable bearing capacities can be used. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated with differential movement of about one-half inch. Most of the anticipated settlements should occur during construction as dead loads are applied. Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against the competent native soils or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of .40 can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred fifty (350) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). These lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor-of-safety of 1.5 has been included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. Footing excavations should be observed by a representative of ECI, prior to placing forms or rebar, to verify that conditions are as anticipated in this report. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 7 Retaining and Foundation Walls Retaining walls and foundation walls that act as retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the retained soils. Walls that are designed to yield can be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty-five (35) pcf. If walls are to be restrained at the top from free movement, the equivalent fluid weight should be increased to fifty (50) pcf. These values are based on horizontal backfill and that surcharges due to backfill slopes, hydrostatic pressures, traffic, structural loads or other surcharge loads will not act on the wall. If such surcharges are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressure. The passive pressure and friction coefficients previously provided in the Foundations section are applicable to retaining walls. If design against earthquake loading is desired, a rectangular pressure distribution equal to six times the wall height (6H) should be added to the above lateral earth pressure values. In order to reduce the potential for hydrostatic forces building up behind the walls, retaining walls should be backfilled with a suitable free-draining material extending at least eighteen (18) inches behind the wall. The remainder of the backfill should consist of structural fill. The free-draining backfill should conform to the WSDOT specification for gravel backfill for walls (WSDOT 9-03.12(2)). A perforated drainpipe should be placed at the base of the wall and should be surrounded by a minimum of one cubic foot per lineal foot with three-eighths inch pea gravel. Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on competent native soil subgrade or on structural fill. Disturbed subgrade soil must either be recompacted or replaced with structural fill. Concrete slabs resting on soil ultimately cause the moisture content of the underlying soils to rise. This results from continued capillary rise and the ending of normal evapotranspiration. As concrete is permeable, moisture will eventually penetrate the slab resulting in a condition commonly known as a "wet slab" and poor adhesion of floor coverings. Therefore, if slab moisture is a concern, the slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane may be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 8 Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 in the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity, however, the majority of these events are of such low magnitude they are not detected without instruments. Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.1 magnitude earthquake in the Olympia area, the 1965, 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Midway area and the February 29, 2001, 6.8 magnitude earthquake near Olympia. There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event at this site: ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground motion response. Ground Rupture: The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Surface faulting from these deep events has not been documented to date. Therefore, it is our opinion, that the risk of ground rupture during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. Liquefaction: Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. Based on the density of the site soils, it is our opinion the potential for liquefaction over the site during a seismic event is negligible. Ground Motion Response: In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, soil type Sc should be used in design. Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 9 In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, the existing fill and medium dense silty sand would be classified as Type C by OSHA. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped at an inclination of 1 .5H:1 V (Horizontal:Vertical). The very dense native soil would be classified as Type A by OSHA. In Type A soils temporary cuts greater than four feet in height can be steepened to 3/4H:1 V. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria. Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. Cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of slopes. Permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Drainage Groundwater seepage was not encountered in our test pits, however if seepage is encountered in foundation or grade beam excavations during construction, the bottom of the excavation should be sloped to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive and permanent discharge, such as a nearby storm drain. Depending on the magnitude of such seepage, it may also be necessary to interconnect the sump pits by a system of connector trenches. The appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, should be established during • grading operations by ECI's representative at which time the seepage areas, if present, may be more clearly defined. • Earth Consultants, Inc, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 10 During construction, the site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water must not be allowed to stand in areas where buildings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved areas, which can be sloped at a gradient of 2 percent. Footing drains should be installed around the building perimeters, at or just below the invert of the footing, with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. A typical detail is provided on Plate 3. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain system. Roof downspouts must be separately tightllned to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered, the soils expected to be exposed by utility excavations should provide adequate support for utilities. The site soils are slightly over the optimum moisture content and may need to be moisture conditioned prior to their use in utility backfill. Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve inches above the crown of the pipe before heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 4. Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 11 Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for pavements, the subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation section of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (per ASTM D-1557-91). It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. The following pavement section can be used for lightly-loaded areas (car traffic): • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CAB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. We will be pleased to assist in developing appropriate pavement sections for heavy traffic zones, if needed. Pavement materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. The use of a Class B asphalt mix is suggested. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided us, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation Page E-9967 7 December 26, 2001 12 The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Additional Services As the geotechnical engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. Earth Consultants, Inc. 333 338 340 342 344 346`\` 346 350 352 354:56 Existing Proposed Retaining Wall Keystone Walls - 364 349 o �TP-5. 'fPi `till. 344 I 342 ill h iFP-2 EPJI � 340 I I r.- •---..1-_ ' ... 1 . .. •:'} \ � ..._' 338 L 4 338 334 I Paved-Parking Area. - I LEGEND TP-1 —i—Approximate Location of Approximate Scale ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. 0 25 50 - E-99667, Dec. 2001 E?1: 441 r subject Site (hist( + ) Earth Conical Engineers. sultants,s&EnvironmentalInc. aeotsts Proposed Building Test Pit Location Plan 13th Place Professional Building Existing Building Federal Way, Washington h NOTE:This plate may contain areas of color. ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent Drwn. GLS Date Dec. 2001 Prot. No. 9967 misinterpretation of the information resulting from black&white reproductions of this plate. Checked KMW Date 12/18/01 Plate 2 • C l Slope To Drain _• • f F 's}� y. _:• :b .,;y•pr•�":wSF: •.)iti.,:iryb a'f .r•.9 i"• �»+.;y• .'i'i `•'ii- .rS • •- • g 1: i? • • O . 'C:i7n`r- 700 ,; e%•91 ;,119a o .;i'i+`5;�5 ti' �i�x`sCf"'k'r'.i iZe�`•S':rtc}^:}:'.;i•• `ori�y:i a iiYa:...i.,��y:.:�i i:.g;:>. •. .O q +�!;i` 'r'd� • • `a;.is;•:{3"ti:'k.:i-.rt,..•{!i:{d��: ..:it'{�p:..x',�•,;.v Y`yt •o J ,'!i-, ;:°y, = <.,�.ip,,,,�. ,.:J .,ief.+... ' :. r Y'. O •o in. _ c .. ..,u.::: ' r iry r' 'iri aYt',' o 6 inch m :.: :•:war;? ' .::'.;•=.'n5:.s:1. Y4r:; ; :;; x.: ,W;�,. T'"i{%L.:[iP• ;A:;;i�`^1••.`V.i.:t:,`r' ;ki:;`�.•i;3. ':ja.*Ai.(.:�:,7*:1 l�0:•:2�:4;ii °o : h': ▪ :+5�• ;.- F:s�::y:� ��_]+`ds'r::'::i': :;• :ii- • : •••-:;.. p -'��• �Q' ;::';•':_Q.'�' � •. •. 18 inch min. .,•••• •+• •• •�•�':!' •',••�• • • .• ••.•:_-'�.%.:•0:-.• •••• • •1.•�•nip••o-• • .•�.•y.•:e.�• _ 'O • 00. .I.• ••-•I•.O••.O.J Q'i ••1'••.. .� O • • 0 • • • 4 inch min. .•.:•. • . _ • :• •• �'••'� '• "----_ Diameter o:•:,� -:o ° .o o• 0 •0 �0 0 Perforated Pipe—�~" ••:; • •+' �••y••• '•.s onO� o0o•e • Wrapped in Drainage • ▪7. O . O - 'er- o e • e •I Fabric • 2 inch min. 2 Inch min. / 4 inch max. 12 inch --A- min. SCHEMATIC ONLY-NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING LEGEND Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. • Fine aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete; Section 9-03.1(2) of the . = o WSDOT Specifications. Q Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down;tight jointed;with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains Into footing lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric or equivalent. • • 441% TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL \(�•- 11) Earth Consultants Inc. 13th Place Professional Building Ir1�'1�w .+� •�^" "'�'�"�"'�'� Federal Way, Washington • Proj. No. 9967 I Drwn. GLS Date Dec,2001 Checked KMW I Date 12/18/01 I Plate 3 • Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas Roadway Areas I[ r I i,=+ n 1t`=; F,4014}.•.•,+`X:„� •4*:• o `;fr:t-s?h,Cv:=}0:3••;s>=o. Varies . ?'•11 Crt A'-•;;Al!..Tt cr}l V° 0'•°O• 9`'1 }0�0y• 0 0 • Ft`i -.•F..s :L ki.iy,t a�ii:•i:c. /iiivP:,..:1,:.a s.wy.:}•y ., .:_ '•'.•g;•,..t.i .; r; Minimum k�P,} ;_::,:,::r s .t:.:a;•,•;: .;.4';: .t,;k: ;;<�•%t a. 1 Foot .-�.�;;;!'"v,°;±�1vl�C;:q..i•.l�lt��.,•:-' :••:�::n�:'95 `•i�.:t i`if. � 4 �.y •e H}4{^I,2.��Y;�.::i:}'��'LJj.'i.4. ��'��Yt:•':y:t•j `.-tr:i,•,S'S�.(:;,*4- ,-'e,.t:.>i:.• $":1: �i°! :GAS••:r.z,-,::.: _ v,.-;;�',a:iiY1':F¢i,`/p:.'tt.•i�..4,.-5fr•t1yu1..'4:1.(i.:P;1'TH{5�;.'J..:• A " =.�:t.%r`�'�f.v4�a.... ,�e,.Y�.r�k:� a.,•.•6 x.:sA'!•.tt"•"::�;;µi;!wx.'•}.;�.!:''. ,.:,.:ri.-". .:iC '._". .tya�'1i:,r..�t�i?..'y�rli'kf:'!u` _:•.k,. >:i.•,?.;::a`°%,'�'( . Bal.rRl ,•' i•:ti f•t•• .I.:W'' l:I:•ii:•S KJ!.n..``t•th�i.r• ••4:�:.a;•r:••,-; '� 45.+•..�.�.'`.•''.v't%r`i`?!fi''";s.:,;L; t;;.,.<.::� ;^?i� :;r: Varies • .... ..: o 'oo AJobLOI Bedding ''0%' • :•o°•op'°d�.0„.. G Varies e •. • c� •0r0• o� ° �n Dpr``rii''Qoo o•�bQO�j�iio°a",V:�• 0•,'+'0'0•P•o LEGEND: " ,g;;1 y Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab ;.;:4:.!ice.i f,:!:i, ,0.0 a0•• . o •. Base Material or Base Rock . - • • . << Backfill; Compacted On-Site Soil or imported Select Fill [.„:45,,`,.;(p),:i±,?:i.';3,..•:'-'*-j'''t,i1,-1/41s Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General 4: ' , ' ' Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. 95 Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-91 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. VIli6.pS-A o, Bedding Material; MaterialTpe Depends on Type of Pipe and • ' '� ReLacommendations orrdthdie 7 peoof P penSeectedhe Manufacturers • /o. rA` Ott TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL �� l� ,� r Earth Consultants Inc. 13th Place Professional Building �1r If1r�t� 1 'O" "''`�' '" °p'S`F"°' �� c""�� Federal Way, Washington Pro1.No. 9967 I Drwn. GLS Date Dec,2o01 Checked KMW Ite 12/18/011Plate 4 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-9967 Our field exploration was performed on December 14, 2001. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating six test pits to a maximum depth of seven feet below the existing grade. The test pits were excavated by Northwest Excavating subcontracted to ECI, using a rubber-tired backhoe. Approximate test pit locations were determined by pacing from site features. Approximate test pit elevations were determined by locating on the site plan provided by Lance Mueller and Associates. The locations and elevations of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by a engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. Samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Test Pit Logs are presented on Plates A2 through A7. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. The consistency of the soil shown on the logs was estimated based on the effort required to excavate the soil, the stability of the trench walls, and other factors. Earth Consultants, Inc. GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS ;SYMBOL SYMBOL • 'M i:? C* c GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand Gravel Q °a °Q ' gW Mixtures,Little Or No Fines And Clean Gravels P1 Gravelly (little or no fines) M • GP Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel- Coarse Soils I • 1 • $ ' gp Sand Mixtures,Little Or No Fines Grained Soils More Than ! I GM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- b0% Coarse Gravels With �'� J�� I gm Slit Mixtures r t iionne Fines(o appreciable ;1 ,. Al GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- Retained On amount of fines) Clay Mixtures No.4 Sieve 9C o ' SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly And Clean Sand o R.- la SW Sands, Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no fines) SP Poorly Graded Sands, Gravelly More Than Soils . Sp Sands,Little Or No Fines 50% Material 8 0 Larger Than More Than insiiil! SM Silty Sands, Sand-Silt Mixtures No.200 Sieve 50% CoarseSands With Sm • Size Fraction Fines(appreciable Passing No.4 amount of fines) a,�� YT<* Sc Clayey Sands, Sand Clay Mixtures Sieve R3y.?.4.•,:�°FF ¢ SC 1 ML Inorganic Slits&Very Fine Sands,Rock Flour,Silty- ml Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Slits w/Slight Plasticity. Fine Silts J Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Liquid Limit CL y Grained And Less Than 50 CI Grav¢lly Cla 9,Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean • Soils Clays Organic Silts And Organic I I I i I � I OL Ol Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity MH Inorganic Silts,Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fins More Than mh Sand Or Silty Sails • 50% a Smallerer T ln An And slits Liquid Limit 1 CH Inorganic Clays Of High Smaller Greater Than 50 No.200 Sieve Clays CI1 Plasticity, Fat Clays. Size OH Organic Clays Of Medium To'High / //f Oh Plasticity, Organic Slits ( i / / / 'I�-� � 'u PT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Sails• L t 1e u r, t I pt With High Organic Contents Topsoil ' NI, .1.4, Humus And Duff Layer '♦♦♦♦♦♦ Fill •♦♦�♦�•♦♦�♦♦ Hiyhly Variable Constituents • The discussion in the text of this report Is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented In the attached logs. DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,1st I 2"O.D.SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf• W MOISTURE,%dry weight I 24"I.D.RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED WATER OBSERVATION WELL * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT,% SL DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER Pi PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION Y SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE -�,}: LEGEND 46/604� Ertl� CsultatsI .CSe exiu&C S.d i,gl,xxvs,CkxSlu t Z i ia,nnxaSul I:mists Proj. No, 9967 I Date Dec. t 01 I11ate Al Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Budding 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9967 KMW 12/14/01 TP-1 Excavation Contactor Ground Surface Elevation: NW Excavating 335' Notes: Surface Conditions: General W S a Notes (%) o �ii $' " SM Brown silty SAND with gravel,dense, moist 1 — 10.9 2 -- -26%fines 3 — -very dense and gray 4 — tis- 5 c 6 Test pit terminated at 6.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. 8 ./tp. Test Pit Log ��il� (!'r�r�1iI�` Earth Consultants Inc. 13th Place Professional Building Jckoechnicairyonexmcedostusekftwrmnmerimiscrtnfts Federal Way,Washington W Proj.No. 9967 Dwn. GLS Date Dec.2001 Checked KMW Date 12/19/01 Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and udgment. They are not representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsbirity for the use or interpretation by others of Infnn,, *inn.,.seenla.r nn • Test Pit Log 1 Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: • 9967 KMW 12/14/01 TP-2 Excavation Contactor Ground Surface Elevation: NW Bcavating 340' Notes: 2 2 2 co -§ Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 4" General W • - •• 0-. E 0E Notes CYO ••• •• SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist(Fill) ••• •• ••• ••••• •— 2••-• •-• SM Reddish brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 10.8 : 7 3 — • • 4 5 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,dense to very dense, moist 6 • Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during exc.avation. • ,011, Test Pit Log (hilt Earth Consultants Inc. 13th Place Professional Building !3, \\I e f \ ff Gaitechnical EntgrrAS.GeolotOsis&EnvhDrimennil Scienttn Federal Way,Washington i% Proj.No. 9967 Own. GLS Date Dec.2001 Checked KMW Date 12/19/01 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and udgmenLThnthieey are not representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of L Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9967 KMW 12/14/01 TP-3 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: NW Excavating 344' Notes: Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 4" General W 78- E„ Z.° 2 2 Notes (%) • SM Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist • 2 3 - - • 4 11.0 % SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,dense to very dense,moist A • f' 6 Test pit terminated at 6.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during emavation. 8 0 . Test Pit Log • r kV (MEI 49 Earth Consultants Inc. 13th Place Professional Building • ww 1:14 f Ccolectritcal Pntibtxxs.CeoingIsm&Fnvl moment*Scientists Federal Way,Washington . 0 Proj.No. 9967 1 Dwn. GLS Date Dec.2001 Checked KMW Date 12/19/01 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations atfiie time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and ti.fdgmtri!. They are net 4hi. representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9967 KMW 12/14/01 TP-4 • Excavation Contactor Ground Surface Elevation: NW Excavating 342' • Notes: — Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 4" General W E E E Notes N ei• 0 g cr; SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist • -19%fines 11.3 2 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,dense to very dense,moist „ 4 Test pit terminated at 4.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during mavation. • • • § 5 4h, 444, Test Pit Log (110(11- 0010 Earth Consultants Inc. 13th Place Professional Building Tiff \‘' 11 GeolechnIcal lIngineags,Geoloipsts SnvironnxtnMI Sclentivls Federal Way,Washington 0 Prot No. 9967 Own. GLS Date Dec.2001 Checked KMW Date 12/19/01 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and tiggrnent They are not ffnersarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 1 • Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9967 KMW 12/14/01 TP-5 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: NW Emavating 336' Notes: Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 4" General W 2 2 -ii Notes (%) SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense,moist •-•:',i,-.-' —iJ 14.0 k.li;, 1 ----- : 2 .:,..,. . - SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,very dense, moist . -.,:i•- . c“F 3 --- ..,...:,:...Lii...., Test pit terminated at 4.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. i . 5 • 0 0. g • t• ,i,'', iiA, 10h. Test Pit Log § thi:At is6.1101 Earth Consultants Inc. 13th Place Professional Budding gwo 7, Ny Of NI'ri,li GeoPedinical firiebea,IS.Geolostsis&Envtrorunennil Sctenttsts Federal Way,Washington k . 0 Proj.No. 9967 Dwn. GLS Date Dec.2001 Checked KMW Date 12/19/01 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and ? .n gment. TheyartrAtot necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9967 KMW 12/14101 TP-6 Excavation Contactor Ground Surface Elevation: NW Excavating 334' Notes: Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 4" General W E E Notes (%) g t(7, ••• SM Brown silty SAND with gravel,loose to medium dense, moist(Fill) ••••• •• ••.• • -• 1 5.7 ••••• •• — ••• •• ••• 2 — •• ••• •• ••• — • • • 3 — • SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense,moist „' 4 5 , — SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,very dense, moist 8 _ A - Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below eAsting grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Test Pit Log k „pis, (A. ',iv k. „AM Earth Consultants inc. 13th Place Professional Building § GookKtinkallIntenefts•Ge0100S4S&ittvtronmental Sclertitsm Federal Way,Washington Proj.No. 9967 Own. GLS Date Dec.2001 Checked KMW Date 12/19/01 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and tiwitgritntiv.„They ere not uvi representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of .,th APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-9967 Earth Consultants, Inc. PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHT a 1 o , O p , N co .1. w N n W of r LOWJ L00' J I 1 S2 ma Z00' 2.) ° ++ OO VI } E00' p _1t00' 400 C .-r Z 2L V 900' LuCC w 800' 900' ILI 2 i-y 8 L0 LO' W W z c Z0. ZO' G EQ' = 6T 60' 90' 0 OQZ 80' r-I H . O cd ccd {1 1c W Ol••. 14 k QQL W Z2 °D CO cn ca B J 0 06 /1/ -v' o J 1-4 - 9'Z g cis $ oo -$•W 1 N 7, �. = OE L ti w r�I rI i 9L Z m / Q:� via 0L / a C y 3 g co 5 s , q ¢ aPI Pci 1 - v Qz 6 _ - Ill> tih 8 z 0 Cr) Ell wII Bye -0 L w aI / 7° J • b - OZ xcc - C I w p Zbi.L / 08 ¢ dZ/L4 - -06 OZ p I pII Z c a O - 09 H Ei ,W• E -,08 H Ni iti 6 - OOL IN -1 w I 9 co -OOZ V Q 4 00E ZLg Qw N m a a r0i N cs PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT ilTi • , 4 A • 1 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSES • w: Earth Consultants Inc. 1''3th Place Professional. Building the ill NI • ':Getaiechnicat Engineers,Geologists!!Environmental scientisis Federal Way, Washington Proj. No. 9967 I Drwn. GLS I Date Dec. 1011 Checked KMW I Date 12/18/01 I Plate B1 m m - "0 VIM z z •3 ay C to Z '< OZZ S .3 .3 n o o .'b n n m to x a° C m o to 0 fO n m C x 7 o w x 7 C m m C H m > rt C I C V V P. H H r w w > 0 0 .0 rt w m 'O 0 C 01 C Di 0 C w H. rt ft to r- rt r- O H. P. P. n (V a w H. rr r Iv rt P. P. O rt rt N 7 C G O. rt 7 '0 D rt G w H a H C Pr C w En rt C 4 C 'O 4 'O O V H 7 P. tD •0 7•'O 'O O w w 0 f-t, w C rf C (D f-' a 7 Di (D P- P. H r I P. H 7' C' 7' 7' CO Z 0 o ft H- •C P. op En C rt Pt) rt 0CD H H H. r- rt 5 0 7 P. 07 7 H. rr H rt rt CD O CD C 7 (n O O w r- r- C H C C r- C a tO 7 Z K 4 7 C Cn m -i < •J H H 0" CC rt r P. 7 n 0 < H. o 0 H (n rt rt t0 C a° t0 a O' CC Z tr - 0 to O '< '< 0 0 rt P. 7 7 w w to tG (D Z E H < '< O •o CC C A w o co C C 40 rt rt H C Z H '-C D > Di 'O Cn rt CT7 CC w C C n 7 H w w C H H. H < m x7 H rt rt or - w .0 0 ft rt '< -3 P. C0 'O H �C rwt 0 V J (C w C G rt w 0 0 > 0 Di N H '-3 10 to w w C Z r' w rt 'U 7 7 r- H (n 4 ft 7 H. 0 m X 4 4 'O r- (D r- r 4 0 P.4 C C C (n 'O 0 0 C 7 7 G rt (n 7 •o •o ft w (D rt •C r- 0 m ,... 0k 01 It 01 0 O ,v ?7 XI 7.7 kl Y > K z 'Z K K K K H O CO CO tr1 PI'T7 ^] "'] ^7 CC H ( O 0 to [n (n O P7 K K 7 (n VI 0 .0 Q Z N F y W 4, tD -.1 tD N V ''-' N O cc, O 1 J co O F-' CO CO 01 W O 0 • O O N tD .0 •c tD CO 0 CO co CO J 03 03 N w •p '-' 0 0 w N I..., 01 0 N l0 •, 1-• 4, W N 1' O V tD V 0 0 0 In w f` m 0 a C w LC t, II C=1 C it it a 0 0 (n 0 m m 7,7 77 x1 .b C '-3 K K K K K K C K K t" 5 H Di m m t'7 �' C m m z m m m m �' to t') C'- hV+ f✓- w 1 "7 '+] "7 O VK CO O O m CO v7 O O to CC C 0 O Z z CC C-' to to I-' F-. F-i In 01 rt i. O 1-' 0 NJ 01 N - 01 O O O co o co co O O N O N -C 0 0 • O O ( nHD 0 w o 0 01 0 co tD 01 01 CO 01 N 0 N N 03 O V V •O F+ O O 03 O n CO CO 0 A. Cr, a CO A co •O 0> O O % V 0 0 0 CC O '0 m w Di to _3 Z z z ZZZZ y o 0 0 O 0 0 0 CC 1 CC to rn r CC C CC CC w t...1 m m 0 0 0 `� 0 0 m m m th • �TJ • -7iii -7 -7 O (ten CC o 0 o Z 00 00 m to 0 0 0 e, V y y > 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 K Z 0 0 0 0 0 ',)y 0 0 z 0 rt C m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 7 n CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 7 7 7 7 7 rt w rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt rt ft rt rt rt rt Of ft rt ft C P. C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C H 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H I-1 H H '0 P. 73 PC f< rt rt rt to rt rt rt rt rt Z 2 b rr HI H C n Cu Di w C C 0 7' 7' O 7' 7' 7' 7' 7 G G G 7 H H. w 0 C m C m co co m m m m co co m fli 0' t5 7 ((DD m C a 5 1 a o 0 0 o n H O 77 0 x t' C C rt 'O t' C 13C rt 0 H H 0 0 0 H. rt w C H. 0 H H H. (D w 'D C 7 '< 0 0 H C 7 C rt w rt H t0 t rt 7 7 C (n rt .0 Z Z Fh m P-P, 7' 7 C n 7• m 0 0 '< a a H m (n (C ff C M O O 1-h rt Ill 0. C C (n 1-h I-h C r- w r- w 4 r- w H- r- w 7 CO rt 0 7 C 0 rt 7 H C n 7 n n H rt rt 0 O ff rt Di a ID 0. C w P. rt H. - a w C7 C rt C rt co C 40 t7 w fr C f--1 O 1-h r- 7 0 7 t' 0 C w rt r a 7 w n C co O rt 1-1, rt P. C rt w '{ r- a H 0 rh CD7 0 < 0 w H. C C H• a rtO rt 0 C H. Fh '0 7 coto 'o w C ft rh 7- rh w w 'O o '0 C 0- 0' w C H rt H 0 r- 7 P. C H < rt ` H. H H. 7 0 0. C C 0 C 7' 0 P. 7 rt w C .0 w H .00 H 7 'o ft rt 7 N w 0 0 < < 0 to w rt • a Frt'- Frt'- H H 1-1)' C o w f-C H- 0 O H. to rt rt P. H rt a 7 7 w C 7' C 0 r- '< H. t7 ` C H rt Di < r r- CO CC r• m rn (C 7 1-,a w 'n m m a M • co rt I 7' H. rt N C rt 7' O CD W to CC w r- tC C H rt .0 H. C '-' G rt 0 w 7• 0 rt 0 r- r- o n 7 ` 0 H v7 0 7 co 7 K r- w r Use Specialty Retail (SPA) Period Weekday Evening Street Peak Code 814 Parameter ;ross Leasable Areal 1 Quantity 18. 628 Studies 5 Outliers 0 Lower Data Range 15. 000 Upper Data Range 210. 000 %Entering 44 Rate 2. 71 Std Dev 1. 83 Equation Type Lin Coefficient A 2. 400 Constant C 21.48 R^2 0. 98 Data Close to Rate? Y Data Close to Equation? Y Closest Data Point RATE Trips by Rate 50.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 Trips by Equation 66.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Within Data Range? YES NO NO NO N>2? YES NO NO NO N>19? NO NO NO NO Outliers<5%? YES NA NA NA y-intercept 21.48 NA NA NA Near 0? NO NA NA NA Std Dev/Rate>1.10? NO NA NA NA R^2>0.75? YES NO NO NO RECOMMENDATION RATE STUDY STUDY STUDY Trips 50.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Rate 1.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weight by Equation 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 RESULTS RATE EQUATION AVERAGE Weighted Average 50.48 66.19 58.33 Entering Trips 22.21 29. 12 25. 67 Exiting Trips 28.27 37.06 32. 67 Pass-By% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% Total New Trips 50.48 66.19 58.33 Entering New Trips 22.21 29.12 25. 67 Exiting New Trips 28.27 37.06 32.67 Enter comments Enter Land Use Enter Time Period Enter ITE Land Use Code Enter Independent Variable Enter Quantity of Independent Variable Enter Number of Studies Enter Number of Outlying Data Points Enter the Lowest Data Point Enter the Highest Data Point Enter the Percentage of Trips Entering the Site Enter the Rate Enter the Standard Deviation of the Rate Enter Logarithmic, Linear, Inverse, Semi-logarithmic, or Exponential. Enter the coefficient of the variable of the equation. Enter the constant of the equation Enter the coefficient of variation. Enter Yes or No Enter Yes or No Enter Rate or Equation Enter Pass-By Rate CEDARS REDESIGN Technical Information Report June 16.2000 Prepared for Mr. Tom Pierson Celebration Terrace. LLC P.O. Box 502 Milton WA 98354 Submitted by ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 33915 15t Way South, Suite 200 Federal Way, WA 98003 253.838.6113 tel 253.838.7104 fax BEM F?ESUBM!TTED www.esmcivil.com JUN 2 6 2008 CI BOF EDERAL WAY oEPr. Technical Information Report FOR CEDARS REDESIGN Prepared for: Mr.Tom Pierson Celebration Terrace,LLC Po Box 502 Milton WA 98354 Prepared by: ESM Consulting Engineers 33915 1 st Way South,Suite 200 Federal Way,WA 98003 C � WAS b. -- 44 `<i OttS. 43952 '?O,cRFCISTE 9 \�ti� "SS/ONAL LNG EXPIRES S f 2.t f 10 June 16,2008 Job No. 1418-001-007 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Overview • Figure 1 —TIR Worksheet • Figure 2—Vicinity Map • Figure 3—Drainage Basins • Figure 4.1 —Soil Survey • Figure 4.2—Soil Map Legend • Figure 4.3—Soil Map Unit Legend II. Conditions and Requirements • Conditions of Approval III. Offsite Analysis • Upstream • Downstream IV. Flow Control and Water Quality Analysis and Design V. Conveyance System Analysis and Design • Narrative • Backwater Analysis VI. Special Reports and Studies • Geotechnical Engineering Study • Wetland Delineation & Study Report • Traffic Report • Wall Structure Design VII. Other Permits VIII. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Analysis and Design IX. Bond Quantities, Facility Summary and Declarations of Covenant X. Operations and Maintenance SECTION I PROJECT OVERVIEW SECTION I PROJECT OVERVIEW Project Description Celebration Terrace, LLC proposes the construction of an office building, associated parking, storm drainage conveyance system and associated utilities on a site that was previously developed. The project is located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 21 N., Range 4 E., W.M. within the city limits of the City of Federal Way, Washington. The project site is located on Lot 1 of the Secoma Business Park. The project is located in the West Hylebos Creek basin, which is described in the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan. The project site area is approximately 1.09 acres with roughly 1.00 acres of that being developable. The existing surface water runoff from the site presently is divided into two basins. The northerly basin is approximately 0.09 acres, which flows westerly along the existing access road to 131h Place. The southerly basin is approximately 1.0 acres and also flows westerly towards 13th Place. The existing condition of the site is approximately 80% paved with 20% landscaped area. Under developed conditions, a storm water conveyance system for the parking lot and roof drainage is proposed. The parking lot storm flows will be treated for water quality using an underground StormFilter, previously known as a Leaf Compost Filter. The parking lot storm flows will then be released into the existing storm sewer located at the southwest corner of the site. The overall calculated impervious coverage utilized in this analysis is 80%. Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART I PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner Celebration Terrace,LLC Project Name Cedars Redesign Address: P.O.Box 502,Milton,WA 98354 Location Phone Township 21 North Project Engineer Eric Pitcher,P.E. Range 4 East Company ESM Consulting Engineers,LLC Section SE VI of 17 Address Phone 33915 1"Way S, Federal Way,WA Project Size 1 AC (253)838-6113 Upstream Drainage Basin Size 0.0 AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS Subdivision I- DOF/G HPA r— Shoreline Management Short Subdivision I- COE 404 I— Rockery X Grading DOE Dam Safety ly Structural Vaults X Commercial T FEMA Floodplain fl Other I- Other I COE Wetlands I— HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Federal Wav Drainage Basin Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS I— R• iver fl F• loodplain f— S• tream W• etlands Critical Stream Reach l Seeps/Springs Depressions/Swales P H• igh Groundwater Table Ea L• ake fl G• roundwater Recharge I Steep Slopes L_ Other I Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities EwC 6- 15% Slight to Moderate Slow to Medium r—Additional Sheets Attached Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT Additional Sheets Attached PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION DURING CONSTRUCTION X Sedimentation Facilities X Stabilize Exposed Surface X Stabilized Construction Entrance I— Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities X Perimeter Runoff Control X CIean and Remove All Silt and Debris X Clearing and Grading Restrictions X Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities X Cover Practices i F• lag Limits of NGPES I_ Construction Sequence E O• ther r O• ther PART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM I Grass Lined Channel I Tank Infiltration Method of Analysis X Pipe System X Vault r— D• epression Rational _ O• pen Channel (- E• nergy Dissipater rJ F• low Dispersal w/Backwater r D• ry Pond r� W• etland r� W• aiver I! Wet Pond IJ S• tream X Regional Detention Existing Brief Description of System Operation Storm Pipe conveyance through StormFilter water quality vault, previously known as a Leaf Compost Filter,to existing detention facilities Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitations I Additional Sheets Attached PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS I Cast in Place Vault i Other X Drainage Easement C� Retaining Wall I Access Easement _ Rockery>4'High ( N• ative Growth Protection Easement I- Structural on Steep Slope r— T• ract O• ther Wetland PART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments, To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate Signature/Date \\csm8\engr\csmjobs\1418\001\007\locument\tir worksheet doc Fxc. 2. Vicinity M Zvi S.W. 320th ST. S. 320th ST. ///////AC�/ ( ) , �EA T --‘ > / MALL' -o `0o Nl. .N- oo SITE g9 3� ° 4i 2 0 S. 330thSTIj7' NorthLake s S 336{h ST• ;110N I fiD vivi 1.Li Qc /y�S. 344TH WAY \ v N to 7 W N o S. 348th ST. L --.•.\ IN m S 349th STD g Ui Y' w 1 "¢ s11 dVW NISVB 30VNIVeIO 03S0d02Id ,p-° ' �"`1.V0 ,�,. 11 oN""'° N V I V a - (� V Y a sor ."'""vv.do�.pu.l I' luo�u tr ntsi I anand buuuey puol 6up6un9 i*d euut'W M q,,d DO ^'� ["'/elms) —Tbml yG7 WO3IIAi7WS3'MMM �.J11 `30daaD1 N011eae3130 I I " I ® I oce#Lim sAeMIjal Sl6EE Oil Sk133NION3 ONIl'1f1SNOO w s so-la smuveuo I--£ 3anOIl R a vo a _ ffi ; a Y 1g C " � e— 'Li; N T s 1 rs 11/ 11 N al a seal 14 is OOh N ! II (or 1 o., .1 1 „....... I?. \\,n 1 � i 1 i E 1 % I.. /A>:-r\ ii,!, t.,...L.\\\-- ttrelit - �; ) 1' Iwmw.owwr2axssrsassz>>r>9.!<i �I s° mo�� is: t =� ■ �I,� = �` k�'i / G / ►� �1 1. X • 1(17,-- i DI j I �`�fD�i�11 Kt GIs,✓ I I p,1 r ' r_.iy o- ; ./ ,s3- _. , lEt,_________....- - fdI 1=— ----�, ,-- \ //, s r nor \ _sI \\- I 1 DS 30b1d 4 I. ) / Pss...H w^l A9 PMloid Via SO:I 90OZ/Zl/9 tallod sm-90,3\.11v4x8 00\ma\BIYI\Seor-ns3\gato\9ua3\\uk, dW1 NISVB 9NIlSIX3 �'° ` �'"s . ""wa u�.,/ - - �,.� t9a-Im-91•1 Tow mar N O I S 2 Q — D}d S H V Q 2 0 aawaalwaa amacoaoi I t wawa6Puan taaio.d I Pr PM a9ane 6Vuuas PaOI fiu:u,, lo)d 6uua9u:6u3 aw° rose-ros toad a twazx.nu WOD'11A1°WSO'MMM gin ta I= a t M3IL mPed 011 `90VI1H91 NOI1VE192193 I " ii I I ® I 00Z4l oS am>slSl6EE WS= 011 SH33N19N3 `JNtiln8Noo owutwa Z.0 9anOId El a g 11 V 6 $ 6 a c 4 e- W til Q i a € I1 o E -JZ l• 11 W y, j` ra ), f IIN \ /) '''), \ 1. . ' ?'l ) 1 1 R A ."--; \ .„/ / 1) . I. Ig ..\\ '' (./7 inii / '\ 1 81 t _______------ - D\ , ye / '1" / \ Ip, o \\ •, III 1 t X-'''''' \ ), a I - / \ . .1 i \ i\ °' i • ,__.j /, ' --- i,--,1. \'.. • , ee �, •\•. � _fir„ _ / q\-r,,\•, �-i..�-g M _ III to ,r / ,,, l'''.:1 laoaa3noo rioNvO 2_ 71--\ OS 3Ob I _4H 11 7) — /// Paa9Yo9 AUPI CAB Pallas DV 91,t I Soot/tl/9-0a1ad asarc9-wa\trlwaa\(oa\l9a Vast\69ar-nu\taa•\9a'a3\\.aLI 'FIG, 4. 1 Soil Map—King County Area,Washington 551100 551200 551300 551400 551500 551600:43 551700 551800551000 552000 0 0 ,ram # M i i l ., .., g , . al U t { C ii � �.- ' 9 t NI)ST r p't .r r ' w, 1 4 Io M ' o 0 0 I ile \yr oaf` " ; i' (l d l Mi ttasT_ `op::- ,,,' ' 'S�. 3, - o N 1 , -4., ot, ' ! l't I i f / � .44 00 1 -tfil ,1: :' - at , Lg li, ,p --_ tfil` 1 Sri uWmi q T a * adj t l t iFi $11 ',„:$:'!4 ,‘,„,..4" ‘, — : \ \ \ )LOTHST .:5z) o cst e t ' If pg. ' _y a ( "r C�pO a Y4 ( rw "" .g e S m N �Ma+... 1 q � � a' �'- } � < . ray' A # N L .....-... .. rn '' mrx ' S;f41ST, ,FL m T _ z ., ' n. - v7. Z� o0 rZ 0 .f ^4r^ a m � r FA � y fyq � �" _ .. 551100 551200 551300 551400 551500 551600 551700 551800 551900 552000 N Meters A 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 350 700 1,400 2,100 �� Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 9/12/2007 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 �1tr_ 4.z t`M d w Q1 N O c N N To o 2 - a m o rrt E o 2 0 v '3 rna c . eai Eea m a coc � `ay R -cc omm c E ` Na E Z > g i >,E y yea mea vEa gg yo ~ rE- • a o Hu) ato�:QZ RN c e v m ce L O m G1 0 s- D 8 ; p d Q 3 0 L v ar Z m a) o0 p) o _ 3 cd" c E > mm a Z rnd .aU ° d R Ht g c LwE ; ma E(L � n ig c O. Q Eo - nl' 1> N .c'o m= �� Ta>.B Zma w7 ad, oB cg 74E 01« id 3Eor�) n 43 v •N13ED. 0,(j —2 . is -~oc0O.a °w 22 m m() a) g o �m aci o`av'c p x m 'O 'a 4 ,0 v 3 cc5E Eyp. nw ) m a�i oao. al.+ cnn �-o `p m — e 0EoE O5oE v)5O E t)0 Q t=- cpsEo c > o a�1 a c o to M N O N U, N 0 • e rZ. _ N C a. 0 0 o dU U p.fa T m N Is jn U > Z g L" d 'p4 m = m r ni m p co a to = c E .g o 4.6;Z C ¢ CO fy4 m tr. t+ O N N W N E (r m II t m " rj m s .mac 5 § m a -2 N 8 2 c 7 -8 en ,S o a > () c O to O E U D e V to A c U m O 3 o m a oa m )ppa � o c O � tit ar i u , W my1 c a 3 s- W J Z. Q a o co m C 2 N E c a aait: _ O cm ay > mN o L 1 u} a m} > 0. ` O ui c ¢ct x II c m o ro c > m � d c c mcsoc o a o m m c m m u U O t, � , 2 2 x a r vi u) u) 0 r� m US c c c a en cc 0 `IS — = a J ® X • X ® � 4 QC ® ® > 4- i 4. ..0. Et tit 4 m Q N ❑ h o N N O ZU F1t,. 4,3 Soil Map-King County Area Washington Map Unit Legend King County Area,Washington(WA633) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AOl AmB Arents.Alderwood material.0 to 2 4 1 3% 6 percent slopes EwC Everett-Alderwood gravelly 168 1 94 0% sandy hams,6 to 15 percent slopes No Norma sandy loam 5.7 3 2% Sk Seattle muck 1.0 0 6% W Water 1 7 1.0% Totals Tor Area of Interest(AOI) 178 9 100 0% r"ita Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 9l12l2007 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 SECTION II CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY SECTION II CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY There are no SEPA mitigations, environmentally sensitive area requirements, variance and adjustments, or conditions of plat approval affecting stormwater for this project. Review of the 8 Core and 5 Special Requirements ESM has reviewed the Core and Special requirements in Section 1.2 and Section 1.3 of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and offers the following comments: Core Requirement No. 1 —Discharge at the Natural Location The site currently drains to existing storm sewer at the southwest corner of the property where it is conveyed off site. The proposed development will drain to the same existing storm sewer. Core Requirement No. 1 is not applicable, Core Requirement No.2—Offsite Analysis The proposed development does not change the rate, volume, duration, or location of discharges to and from the project site. Core Requirement No. 2 is not applicable. Please refer to page 6 of the Pre-application Conference Summary, dated July 20, 2007., Core Requirement No. 3—Flow Control Since the project replaces an existing building and parking lot, core requirement no. 3 is not applicable. Maintenance will be provided during construction to ensure that on-site infrastructure to remain continues to function as designed. Please refer to page 6 of the Pre-application Conference Summary, dated July 20, 2007. Core Requirement No.4—Conveyance System The proposed storm water infrastructure must be designed for the 25-year / 24-hour design storm such that the 25-year hydraulic grade line is at least 0,5 feet below each rim elevation. Further, any overtopping during the 100-year / 24-hour design storm event must not create severe flooding or erosive problems. Please refer to Section V of this report for design calculations. Core Requirement No. 5—Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Erosion and sedimentation control will be accomplished using perimeter silt fence, gravel construction exit, catch basin sediment barriers, temporary sediment trap with interceptor ditches and temporary and permanent ground cover. Please refer to Section VIII of this report. Core Requirement No. 6—Maintenance and Operations As the project is a commercial development, a Declaration of Covenant will be recorded with the City of Federal Way. Please refer to Section 1X of this report for a copy of the declaration, Please refer to Section X of this report for specific maintenance requirements of storm system components. Core Requirement No. 7—Financial Guarantees and Liability A bond will be posted prior to construction to ensure finances are available to correct incomplete or substandard work. Please refer to Section IX of this report for the Bond Quantities Price Schedule and Worksheet. Core Requirement No. 8—Water Quality A StormFilter will provide water quality treatment for both new and existing pollution generating impervious surfaces on the entire site. Please refer to section IV of this report for design calculations. Special Requirement No. 1 —Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements The project lies within the Hylebos Creek Basin. The proposed water quality facility is intended to meet the requirements of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan.. Special Requirement No. 2— Floodplain/Floodway Delineation The project site does not lie within a 100-year floodplain per FEMA FIRM Panel 53033 C 1250 F, dated May 16, 1995. Special Requirement No. 2 is not applicable. Special Requirement No. 3—Flood Protection Facilities The project site does not contain and is not adjacent to existing Class 1 or 2 flood protection facilities. Special Requirement No. 3 is not applicable. Special Requirement No. 4—Source Control A StormFilter will be installed to provide water quality for the pollution generating impervious surfaces. Please refer to section IV of this report for design calculations. Special Requirement No. 5—Oil Control The proposed land use is an office building with a parking lot designed for 44 standard parking stalls, 14 compact stalls, and 3 handicap stalls. This expected trip generation will not classify the project as a "high-use site". Special Requirement No.. 5 is not applicable. 41/4 CITY of CITY HALL Fed a ra I ■ ` a 3Melling3325 8th Avenudress: South `{•• Way Federal Address: 98 Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-97t B (253)835-7000 www.cllyo(federalway..com July 20,2007 Mr.Tom Pierson PO Box 502 Milton,WA 98354 Re: File 007-103142-00-PC;PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY The Cedars Redesign Office Building;33430 131h Place South,Federal Way Dear Mr.Pierson: Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development Review Committee(DRC)held June 21,2007.We hope that the information discussed at that meeting was helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted, This letter summarizes comments given to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC.The members who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff from the City's Planning and Building Divisions and Public Works Department,and representatives from Lakehaven Utility District and South King Fire and Rescue.Some sections of the Federal Way City Code(FWCC)and relevant information handouts are enclosed with this letter.Please be advised,this letter does not represent all applicable codes.In preparing your formal application,please refer to the complete FWCC and other relevant codes for all additional requirements that may apply to your project. The key contact for your project is Janet Shull(206-244-3749 or janetshulldesign®corncast.net).For specific technical questions about your project,please contact the appropriate DRC representative as listed below.Otherwise,any general questions about the preapplication and permitting process can be referred to your key contact, PROJECT DESCRIPTION A new 20,040 gross square-foot office building on a vacant 47,600 square foot lot with 65 parking stalls and site improvements. MAJOR ISSUES Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and information submitted for preapplication review.These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in the plans These major issues only represent comments that the DRC consider most significant to your project and do not include the majority of the comments provided The major issues section is only provided as a means to highlight critical requirements or issues.Please be sure to read the entire department comments made in the next section of this letter. Fik 1107-103 i4LOo.PC Doe ID 141330 Mr.Torn Pierson Page 2 July 20,2007 • Planning Division • o Sizty-seven(67)parking stalls are required for a building of this size. o Design guideline standards for the entrance facade are not met. o Extensive use of retaining walls;these walls will require design treatment. p CPTED design issue:corridors along length of building pose personal safety risk. • Public Works Development Services Division Water quality on this site will be required to meet current standards for resource stream protection, as outlined in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM)Resource Stream Protection Menu. • Public Works Traffic Division 1. A concurrency analysis is required.. 2. Street frontage improvements and right-of-way dedication are required along 13th Place South. • 3_ The current proposal needs to meet access management standards. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the preapplication conference.Each section should be read thoroughly.If you have questions,please contact the representative listed for that section. PLANNING DIVISION(Janet Shull,206-244-3749,janetsbulldesign®comcast-net) 1. Zoning Use,and Review Process—The zoning of the site is Community Business(BC).The BC zoning district permits office uses pursuant to Federal Way City Code(FWCC)Section 22-751 (enclosed). The office use requires Process III Review,Project Approval.Under Process III,the Director of Community Development makes a written decision on the application based on criteria listed under FWCC Section 22-364.A development submittal checklist and master land use application are enclosed along with applicable code sections.Building permits are issued after Process III approval is granted. 2. State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)—Structures in excess of 4,000 square feet,or the creation of more than 20 parking stalls,are subject to SEPA review and as proposed,the project requires SEPA review.An environmental checklist must be submitted and reviewed prior to the City issuing an environmental threshold determination.All property owners within 300 feet of the site are notified of that decision.The notification includes a 15-day comment and 14-day appeal period.SEPA review must be concluded before the site plan approval and any other applicable land use review may be granted. Fik 0O7•103142-OO-PC Dec TD 141350 Mr.Torn Pierson Page 3 July 20,2007 3. Environmentally Sensitive Areas—There is an existing stream located on the parcel directly east of the subject site.Said stream enters a culvert and travels in this culvert along the southern property line of the subject site.The site plan must clearly identify the location of the stream on and within 200 feet of the site per FWCC Chapter 22,Article XIV,`Environmentally Sensitive Areas."The site plan must also identify the required 100-foot setback from the stream. 4. Fees—The proposal to develop the project requires the following fees:Process III review$2,196.00 (includes fire review fee),and SEPA environmental determination review as part of project$869.50 (includes fire review fee).Additional fees are associated with City and district regulations and permits.Building permits must be obtained before any work commences. 5. Public Notice—Process III and SEPA applications require public notice and must be accompanied by one set of stamped mailing envelopes,prepared in accordance with the City's requirements.' Mailing envelopes shall be addressed to all owners of real property located within 300 feet of site boundaries.In accordance with the City's procedures,all envelopes must contain the Department of Community Development Services return address(PO Box 9718,Federal Way,WA 98063-9718) and a paper List of addressees must be submitted along with the envelopes in addition to an assessor's map with the 300-foot boundary depicted.Mailing information should be current and accurate,in order to avoid having to verify the mailing list and re-mail any notices,thereby affecting project review time frames. 6. Setback Requirements—There are no minimum front,rear,and side setback requirements for the retail uses according to FWCC Section 22-751.The minimum structural and parking area setbacks are dictated by the minimum perimeter landscape setbacks,which in this case is a minimum five feet along all perimeter property lines, 7. Lot Coverage—There is no established maximum lot coverage area.Instead,the buildable area is determined by other site development requirements,i.e.,required buffers,parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities,etc. 8. Building Height—The height of the building allowed by the FWCC is 35 feet above average building elevation.Elevations submitted do not indicate building height.However,it appears that the west elevation exceeds the maximum building height,Building height in the BC zone may exceed 35 feet when certain conditions area met—please refer to FWCC Section 22-751 (enclosed)for specific criteria, 9. Parking Requirements—One parking stall for each 300 square feet of gross floor area is required for retail uses per FWCC Section 22-751.In the case of the 20,040 square foot building,67 stalls would be required.There are 65 parking stalls proposed,and two additional parking stalls are required. Standard parking stall sizes are 8 by]8 feet;compact parking stalls are 8 by 15 feet.Up to 25 percent of the required spaces may be compact stalls,An applicant may submit a parking study per FWCC Section 22-1398(2),to show how a decrease in the required number ofparldng spaces will be adequate to fully serve the proposed uses.A parking stall/drive aisle chart is enclosed,Parking aisles without loop access are discouraged. I See the City handout titled Obtaining Mailing Labels Fie F07.10314246 PC Doc ID 841350 Mr.Tom Pierson Page 4 July 20,2007 10. Landscaping—A preliminary landscape plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect in accordance with FWCC Chapter 22,Article XVII,"Landscaping"(enclosed),is required as part of the Process III submittal.The Iandscape plan must depict the following landscape information: a. Perimeter Landscaping—FWCC Section 22-1566(f),"Community Business,"requires Type 111 landscaping a minimum five feet in width along the front,side,and rear property lines.A preliminary landscape plan must depict these requirements.Type HI landscaping is a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees interspersed with large shrubs and groundcover to create a partial visual buffer to separate uses from the street and soften the appearance of'parldng areas and building elevations. b_ Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—Twenty-two(22)square feet of interior lot landscaping per parking space must be provided for parking lots with 50 or more stalls in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1567(b)(1)(a)(I),or 1,474 square feet for 67 parking stalls.Parking lot landscaping is used to break up large areas of impervious surfaces,mitigate adverse impacts created by vehicle use areas,facilitate the movement of traffic,and improve the physical appearance of vehicle use areas.Type IV landscaping is required at the ends of all rows of parking and disbursed throughout the interior parking area,Type IV landscaping consists of trees,shrubs,and groundcover to provide visual relief and shading. It is unknown if this requirement is met.The square footage of interior lot landscaping must be listed on the landscape plan and the interior landscape areas used for this calculation must be identified on the plan. c. Parking Area Screening—Parking areas abutting the 136 Place South right-of-way must be screened from the right-of-way with either a three-foot tall berm installed within the perimeter landscaping,architectural features,or substantial plantings added to the landscaping in accordance with FWCC Section 1567(e)(1). d. Plant Species—With the exception of lawn areas,at least 25 percent of new landscaping materials shall consist of drought tolerant species.The preliminary plan should indicate how this requirement is satisfied. e, Screening of Blank Walls&Foundation Landscaping—Building walls which are uninterrupted by windows,doors,or other architectural features;that are 240 square feet in area or greater, and are not located on a property line,must be screened by landscaping including trees,shrubs, and groundcovers appropriate for the area per FWCC Section 22-1564(u).Foundation landscaping is also encouraged. f. Modifications FWCC Section 22-1570 outlines the landscape modification options and criteria.Please refer to this section for specific information, 11. Design Guidelines—Projects subject to Process III review must comply with the provisions of FWCC Chapter 22,Article XIX,"Community Design Guidelines."It is the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate how all design guidelines have been satisfied.Additional meetings to discuss design issues are encouraged.Below is a brief list of the major design issues relating to this project. rib 1017.107142-00-PC Da ID 041350 Mr.Tom Pierson Page 5 July 20,2007 a, BC zoning district guidelines in FWCC Section 22-1638(a)(2)require that entrance facades shall front on,face,or be clearly recognizable from the right-of-way and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation.The entrance facade of this building does face the street and entrances to the ground floor office spaces are clearly recognizable.However,entrances to the upper floors are via long narrow corridors running the length of the north and south facades,The application must be revised to provide better access to the upper floors.It is recommended that a centrally located entry located at the west facade be incorporated into the building design to provide better visibility and security for the primary building entrance to the upper floors. b. Building walls over 60 feet in length and visible from the right-of-way shall incorporate specific facade and modulation options.The west facade facing the right-of-way exceeds 60 feet in length, and therefore must meet this requirement.This facade incorporates a canopy running the length of the building.However,at least one additional facade modulation treatment must be applied to this elevation from the following list of options: • Facade modulation; • Landscape screening;or • Pedestrian plaza. Please refer to FWCC Section 22-1635(b)for specific requirements. a. Articulation of blank walls over 240 square feet on all sides of the building is required as outlined in FWCC Section 22-1635(c).The submitted elevations depict areas on the north, south,and east facades that appear to exceed 240 square feet. d. An accessible pedestrian connection from the sidewalk to the building shall be provided and delineated by separate paved routes pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1634(d).The application must be revised to provide a pedestrian connection between the sidewalk and the building. e. All pedestrian routes must be a minimum of five feet in width.It is unclear from the submitted site plan whether all pedestrian routes meet this minimum requirement,The application must provide dimensioning for all pedestrian pathways. f. Additional design guideline elements include pedestrian related amenities including bicycle racks,benches,and trash receptacles. g. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design(CPTED) —Pursuant to FWCC Section 22- 1630,CPTED standards will be applied during project review.A CPTED checklist(enclosed) must be completed and submitted with the Process 1]I application.One area of concern with regard to personal safety is the proposed corridors that are in excess of 60 feet long and screened from view by retaining walls running the length of the building.It appears from the plan drawings that these entry corridors are entry points for access to the upper floors of the building. 12. Solid Waste and Recycling Storage—FWCC Section 22-949(enclosed)requires solid waste and recycling storage areas to be included in all new commercial developments.A solid waste,recycling storage,and/or garbage receptacle area is depicted at the southeast comer of the building.Help with many design parameters related to service access is available via the City's contracted solid waste 17k 907-1031024PPC Doc ID 114135 Mr.Tom Pierson Page 6 July 20,2007 services provider,Waste Management(contact Senior Route Manager John Davis at 206-786-4530 [cell]).FWCC Sections 22-949 and 22-1564(d)provide standards for design,placement,sizing,and screening of garbage receptacles,dumpsters,and storage areas.The enclosure must be screened with a 100 percent sight obscuring fence and landscaping per FWCC Section 22-1564. 13. Rooftop Appurtenances—FWCC Sections 22-960 and 22-1047(enclosed)provide standards for screening of rooftop appurtenances.The site plan submittal should contain a statement of proposed rooftop elements and they should be depicted on the elevation drawings. 14. Light Standards—A lighting plan depicting the location of fixtures must be submitted.Lighting fixtures can not take the place of required landscaping. 15. Signs—FWCC Chapter 22,Article XVIII regulates signage on the site.In general,one monument or pedestal free standing sign is permitted in addition to wall mounted signs.A sign permit is required before any signage is installed.Sign permit information is enclosed. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION(Ann Dower,253-835-2732,ann.dower©cityoffederalway.com) Land Use Issues—Stormwater 1, Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the I998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM)and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the 1998 KCSWDM,This project meets the requirements for a Targeted Drainage Review.At the time of land use site plan submittal,a preliminary Technical Information Report(TIR)addressing the relevance of the project to the eight core and five special requirements of the KCSWDM will be required.A Level 1 downstream analysis shall is not required.The City has 1"=100',five-foot contour planimetric maps and site-specific information that may be used for basin analysis. 2. The project lies within a Level 1 flow control area.However,since the project will simply replace an existing building,the applicant will not be required to provide a new flow control facility,provided the existing flow control facility is functioning properly.The applicant will be required to repair or clean the facility as necessary. 3. In addition to the KCSWDM,our initial review suggests that FWCC Section 22-337,"Nonconforming Water Quality Improvements"applies to this site.Specifically,the following items are applicable: Lb. Redevelopment which involves the construction or replacement of a building footprint or other structure having a surface area of 5,000 square feet or more,or which involves the expansion of a building footprint or other structure by 5,000 square feet of surface area or more; 1.c. Redevelopment which involves the repair or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of an impervious surface,when such redevelopment is not part of a routine maintenance activity, 1,g. Redevelopment,other than normal maintenance or other than tenant improvements,but including any increase in gross floor area,in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value(whichever is greater)of the structure or improvement Fik 107.103142-0O.PC Doc IQ 041250 Mr.Tom Pierson Page 7 July 20,2007 being redeveloped.The applicant may provide an appraisal of the improvement.The appraisal must be from a source acceptable to the City.The Director may require the applicant to provide an appraisal from a second source acceptable to the City if the assessed valuation appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate.If more than one appraisal is provided by the applicant or required by the City,the greater of the two amounts shall be used.For purposes of this determining value under this section,improvements required pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-334(nonconforming development),22-336(street/sidewalk improvements),22-337(nonconforming water quality improvements)and 22-1473(street/sidewalk improvements)shall not be counted towards the 50 percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection. Water quality treatment will be required for the entire site,including new and existing pollution generating impervious surfaces.Treatment options must be selected from the Resource Stream Water Quality Menu provided in the KCSWDM. 4. Detention and water quality facilities for commercial developments outside the City Center Core must be above ground(i.e.open pond.),unless approved by the City of Federal Way Stormwater Management Division.The Stormwater Management Division has reviewed this proposal and will support use of an underground facility if requested. 5. Show the existing and proposed location and dimensions of the detention and water quality facilities on the preliminary plans. • 6. If more than one acre will be disturbed during construction,a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit may be required.Information regarding this permit can be obtained form the Washington State Department of Ecology at www.ecy.wa.aov/prograrns/sea/pac/index.htrnl,or by calling 360-407-6437. Right-of-Way Improvements I. See The Traffic Division comments from Traffic Engineer Soma Chattopadbyay for traffic related items. 2. If dedication of additional right-of-way is required,the dedication shall be conveyed to the City through a statutory warranty deed.The dedicated area must have clear title prior to recording. Building Permit Issues 1. Engineered plans are required for clearing,grading,road construction,and utility work.Plans must be reviewed and approved by the City.Engineering review fees are$753.00 for the first 12 hours of review and$63 per hour for additional review time,A final TIR shall be prepared for the project and submitted with the engineering plans.Both the TIR and the plans will require the signature/seal of a professional engineer registered/licensed in the State of Washington. 2, The Federal Way Development Standards Manual(including standard detail drawings,standard notes,and engineering checklists)is available on the City's website at www.cityoffederalway.com to assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and T . Pile tO7-1O3I42.00-Pe Doc iD 141330 Mr.Toni Pierson Page 8 July 20,2007 3. Bonding is required for all improvements associated with the project..The bond amount shall be 120 percent of the estimated costs of the improvements.An administrative fee deposit will need to accompany the bond to cover any possible legal fees in the event the bond must be called.Upon completion of the installation of the improvements,and final approval of the Public Works Inspector,the bond will be reduced to 30 percent of the original amount and held for a two-year maintenance period. 4. The developer will be responsible far the maintenance of all storm drainage facilities(including the detention and water quality facilities)and street systems during the two-year maintenance period. During that time,the Public Works Inspector will make periodic visits to the site to ensure the developer's compliance with the maintenance requirements.Upon satisfactory completion of the two-year maintenance period,the remainder of the bond will be released.Maintenance for public roads and subdivision drainage facilities then become the responsibility of the City.Maintenance for private roads and drainage facilities,including short plats,remain the responsibility of the individual property owners. 5. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans,the vertical datum block shall include the phrase"DATUM:N.G.V.D.-29"or"DATUM:K.C.A.S.,"on all sheets where vertical elevations are called out. 6. Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24"x 36"or 22"x 34"paper.All final approved drawings shall be drafted/plotted on 24"x 36"or 22"x 34"mylar sheet with permanent black ink.Site plans shall be drawn at a scale of 1"=20',or larger.Architectural scales are not permitted on engineering plans. 7. Provide cut and fill quantities on the clearing and grading plan.Erosion control measures,per the 1998 KCSWDM Appendix D,must be shown on the engineering plans. 8. The site plan shall show the location of any existing and proposed utilities in the areas affected by construction. TRAFFIC DIVISION(Soma Chattopadhyay,253-835-2745,soma.chaitopadhvav(a�citvojfederalway.com) Transportation Impact Analysis 1. The City has adopted new policies for traffic analysis and mitigation requirements effective January I,2007. 2. Per FWCC Chapter 19,Article IV,a concurrency permit is required for this development project; however,it would be exempted from concurrency if the new building is the same size or has a smaller floor area than the prior building.(A concurrency.information package is enclosed.This analysis is performed in accordance to the concurrency tequirements of the Growth Management Act[GMAJ.The concurrency analysis assures adequate roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development project.It provides the applicant an analysis of evening peak hour project impacts and pro-rata share contributions towards transportation projects adopted in the Transportation Improvement Plan[TIPJ.Please note that supplemental transportation mitigation may be required if the proposed project creates an impact not anticipated in the six-year TIP.) Fli a 001.lOu42.O0.PC Due ID 14 MO Mr.Tom Pierson Page 9 July 20,2007 3. The estimated fee for the concurrency permit application is unknown at this time.Please provide the information the year building was constructed and floor area of prior building on the site to estimate the trip generation appropriately.This fee is based on estimated new PM peak hour trips of the current proposal.The applicant will be notified with the actual fees that will be calculated and must be paid prior to staff releasing the completed concurrency analysis.The applicant has the option of having an independent traffic engineer prepare the concurrency analysis consistent with City procedures;however,staff review time requires that the application fee remain the same. Street Frontage Improvements 1. Per FWCC Section 22-1474,the applicant/owner would be expected to construct street improvements consistent with the planned roadway cross-sections as shown in Map III-6 of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan(FWCP)and Capital Improvement Program(CIP)shown as Table III-19.Based on the materials submitted,staff conducted a limited analysis to determine the required street improvements in meeting the FWCC.Based on the analysis and FWCC,the applicant would be expected to construct improvements on the following street to the City's planned roadway cross- sections: • 13th Place South is planned as a Type"R"street,consisting of a 40-foot street with curb and gutter, four-foot planter strips with street trees,six-foot sidewalks,and street lights in a 66-foot right-of- way.Assuming a symmetrical cross section,one-foot right-of-way dedication and half,street improvements are required and should be measured from the street centerline.A modification request is required to waive the street frontage improvement since there is an existing sidewalk adjacent to the curb.Installation of new street lights and trees will not be modified. 2. Right-of-way dedication shall be conveyed to the City through a Statutory Warrant Deed and must have clear title prior to recording. Access and Traffic Circulation As per FWCC section 22-1543,the driveway must be located no closer than 150 feet to any street intersection or to any other driveway,whether on or off the subject property.Modification request is required as access on 13a'Place South closer than 150 feet from the intersection of 13h Place South at the private street and access of the property at the south side. Other Comments The applicant's engineer needs to submit a Vehicle Turning Diagram to the Public Works Traffic Division. This diagram will show how the appropriate design vehicle(bus,garbage truck,and WB-62)can enter, maneuver,and leave the site without encroaching onto opposing traffic lanes or mounting a curb. SOLID WASTE&RECYCLING DIVISION(Rob Van Orsow,253-835-2770,robv(Ilcitvofederalway.com) Solid Waste&Recycling Design Considerations Solid waste and recycling design considerations include: cite 007.107142.00.PC Doe 10114t3 O Mr.Tom Pierson Page 10 July20,2007 • Adequate space allocation for interior and exterior.collection containers.The following exterior trash enclosure parameters will accommodate most solid waste and recycling needs:clear interior dimensions measuring 10 feet deep by 18 feet across,with a single two-door twinging gate spanning across the front of the enclosure.When the gate is opened,no structure or hardware is allowed above grade across the enclosure opening.Gate pins/holes are preferred in positions for closed gates and holding gates open for service access. • User access to interior waste and recycling storage areas/Containers,and to exterior containers screened by enclosure(s). • Unobstructed,safe enclosure ingress and egress for service vehicles,directly in line with enclosure openings. • Landscaping,setbacks,and screening requirements(based on'MCC Section 22-1564(d)&[e]). • Note that larger-scale commercial or multi-family developments may see long-term savings from the use of on-site solid waste compaction equipment,This equipment may require larger enclosures,defined overhead clearance,and consideration of power utility access and drainage management. Help with many design parameters related to service access is available via the City's contracted solid waste services provider,Waste Management.Contact:John Davis—Senior Route Manager at 206.786.4530(cell) BUILDING DIVISION(Scott Sproul,253-835-2633,scottsproul@eityoffederatway.com) International Building Code(1BC),2003 edition Washington State Amendments WAC 51-40* International Mechanical Code(IMC),2003 edition Washington State Amendments WAC 51-42* Uniform Plumbing Code(UPC),2003 edition Washington State Amendments WAC 51-46&WAC 51-47* International Fire Code(IFC),2003 edition • Washington State Amendments* National Electric Code(NEC),2005 edition Accessibility Code,ICC/ANS1 A117.1-2003 Washington State Energy Code,WAC 51-11* • Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code,WAC 51-13* Pil,807.10310.00-PC Dqc ID 0413,0 Mr,Toni Pierson Page 11 July 20,2007 *Current state amendments are dated July 1,2004. **As of January 1,2002,the state amendments now require arc-fault interrupters for 15-20 amp branch circuits serving sleeping rooms in dwelling units(R-1's), Building Criteria Occupancy Classification: Type of Construction: Floor Area: Number of Stories: Fire Protection: Wind/Seismic: Basic wind speed 85 Mph,Exposure,25#Snow load,Seismic Zone D-1 A complete building permit application and commercial checklist.(Additional copies of the application and checklists may be obtained on our web site at www.cityoffederalway.com) Submit^sets of drawings and specifications.Specifications shall include: _Soils report _Structural calculations Energy calculations_Ventilation calculations. Note:A Washington State Registered architect's stamp is required for additions/alterations(new or existing)of 4,000 gross floor area or greater,unless specifically listed as an"exempt"structure per the Revised Code of Washington(RCW). Submit_copies with King County Health Department approval stamp for all projects that include food service facilities,septic systems or other elements within the project that require health department approval. Energy code compliance worksheets are required to be completed and included with your permit application. A wet stamp and signature is required on all sheets of plans and on the cover page of any calculations submitted. Federal Way reviews plans on a first in first out basis;however,there are some small projects with inconsequential review requirements that may be reviewed out of order. Review Timing The first comment letter can be expected within weeks of submittal date.Re-check of plans will occur in one to three weeks after re-submittal. Revised or resubmitted plans shall be provided in the same format,size,and amount as the originally submitted plans.Revised/resubmitted drawings shall indicate by means of clouding or written response, what changes have been made from the original drawings.Plans for all involved departments will be forwarded from Community Development Services. FU 1107.103 u2-06-PC Doc ID 041150 Mr.Tom Pierson Page 12 July 20,2007 Federal Way has an expedited review process.Information is available at our front counter. Other Permits&Inspections Separate permits may be required for electrical,mechanical,plumbing,fire suppression systems,and signs.Applicants may apply for separate permits at any time prior to commencement of construction. When required,special inspections shall be performed by WABO approved agencies or by agencies approved by the building official prior to permit issuance Construction must be approved by all reviewing departments prior to final building division inspection. All concerned departments(planning,public works,electrical,fire)must sign off before the Building Division can final the structure for occupancy.Building final must be approved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.The City of Federal Way does not issue temporary Certificate of Occupancies. All construction projects may be required to have a pre-construction conference.If a pre-con meeting is required,all subs,the general or representative,the architect or representative,the engineer or representative,electrical contractor,and any other interested party,should attend this meeting.Meetings will occur at the Building Division and will be scheduled by the inspector of record for the project. The information provided is based on limited plans and information.The comments provided are not intended to be a complete plan review and further comments are possible at time of building permit plan review. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT(Brian I.Asbury,253-946-5407,basbury®lakehaven.org) Water • Preliminary comments provided by South King Fire&Rescue indicate the existing hydrants on&Ior adjacent to the property are sufficient for the proposed new building.If existing hydrants need to be relocated due to site development,a facilities installation agreement will be required.Additional detail and/or design requirements can be obtained from Lakehaven by submitting a separate application to Lakehaven for a pm-design meeting(application copy enclosed).Lakehaven encourages the owner to apply for either of these processes early in the pm-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. • A water service connection application is required for a separate meter/service for any new connection to the water distribution system,or modification to any existing service connection(e,g., larger service,abandonment of existing service[s],etc.),in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current'Fees and Charges Resolution.' Sewer • A sewer service connection permit will be required for any new connection to the sanitary sewer system,in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current'Fees and Charges Resolution.' Minimum slope for gravity sewer service connections is two percent..In addition to all other sewer service installation standards,installation of a Type 1,48 inch monitoring manhole is required on the private building sewer line,for all new or modified non-residential connections. File rot-Iw I42-Jeri Doe ID 141350 Mr,Torn Pierson Page 13 July 20,2007 • Utility conflicts should be identified and coordination should occur as early as possible in the planning process.Project will need to avoid encroachment with existing Lalcehaven facilities and easement(s). General • Lakehaven's Capital Facilities Charges are calculated on the basis of Equivalent Residential Units (ERU).Residential equivalency for non-residential connections will be estimated based on anticipated water use(one ERU equals 255 gallons per day for water and 220 gallons per day for sewer).The owner will be required to provide a reliable estimate of proposed water consumption (commercial and irrigation)for the property(information from a similar facility may be submitted in lieu of a new estimate).Lakehaven's 2007 Capital Facilities Charges are$3,196/ERU for water and $2,768/ERU for sewer. • Currently,system capacity may be available for this property from system capacity charges previously assessed for water and/or sewer.Please contact Lakehaven for further detail by submitting a separate application for apre-design meeting. All comments herein are valid for one year and are based on the proposal(s)submitted and Lakehaven's current regulations and policies.Any change to either the development proposal(s)or Lakehaven's regulations and policies may affect the above comments accordingly. SOUTH KING FIRE AND RESCUE(Chris Ingham,253-946-7244,chris.ingham(alsonthkinafre.ore) Water Supplies for Fire Protection The required fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute. A Certificate of Water Availability shall be provided indicating the fire flow available at the site. This project will require two fire hydrant(s).Existing fire hydrants on public streets are available for this project Existing fire hydrants on adjacent properties shall not be considered unless fire apparatus access roads extend between properties and easements are established to prevent obstructions of such roads. Fire hydrants shall be in service PRIOR to and during the time of construction. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Designated fire lanes may be required for emergency access.This may be done during the plans check or after the facility is in operation. When required,approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction by parking and other obstructions. Fire-Extinguishing Systems An automatic fire sprinkler system is required. Fk el7.10314R.OF•PC Doe ID 14135C Mr Torn Pierson Page 14 July 20,2007 PIans and specifications for automatic fire-extinguishing systems for the protection of commercial-type cooking equipment shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to installation. Three sets of plans and specifications for automatic fire-extinguishing systems,standpipes,and then appurtenances shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to installation.Plans shall be drawn to an indicated scale,on sheets of uniform size,with a plan of each floor,and shall show those items listed in Chapter 14 of NFPA 13 that pertain to the design of the system.Sprinkler plans shall bear a Washington State Certificate of Competency stamp. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all occupancies requiring 2,000 pm or more fire flow,or where the total floor area included within the surrounding exterior walls on all floor levels,including basements,exceeds 10,000 square feet.Fire walls shall not be considered to separate a building to enable deletion of the required automatic fire-extinguishing system(FWCC Chapter 8,Article If,Division 4). A separate permit is required for the installation of the fire sprinkler system.Contact the Fire Marshal's Office at 253--946-7244 for Fire Sprinkler System Specifications. The system demand pressure(to the source)required in a hydraulically designed automatic fire sprinkler system shall be at least 10 percent less than the correlative water supply curve pressure. Fire department connections shall comply with South King Fire and Rescue Administrative Policy Guideline No.1002. Automatic Fire Detection System A complete fire alarm system is required. An automatic fire detection system shall be installed in all buildings exceeding 3,000 square feet gross floor area.This fire detection system shall be monitored by a central and/or remote station conforming to the current requirements of the National Fire Protection Association standards and/or the fire chief or designee (FWCC Chapter 8,Article II,Division 4). A separate permit is required for the installation of the Fire Alarm System.A complete Fire Alarm System is required.Contact the Fire Marshal's Office at(253)946-7244 for Fire Alarm Specifications. Fire Department Access to Buildings When access to or within a structure or an area is unduly difficult because of secured openings,or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or firefighting purposes,the chief is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an accessible location.The key box shall be of a type approved by the chief and shall contain keys to gain necessary access.Contact the Fire Marshal's Office at 253-946-7244 to obtain a key box. CLOSING This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication meeting and is intended to assist you in preparing plans and materials for formal application.We hope you found the comments useful to your project.We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the City's F'ik strmo3 to-ou-pc Doc ID 841330 Mr Tom Pierson Page 15 July 20,2007 review of the formal application,The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter does not vest any future project application.Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per FWCC Section 22-1657. As you know,this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will follow submission of a formal application,Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication materials submitted. Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify information regarding development requirements outlined above.In addition to this preapplication letter, please examine the complete FWCC and other relevant codes carefully.Requirements that are found in the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project If you have questions about an individual comment,please contact the appropriate department representative noted above.Any general questions can be directed towards the key project contact,Janet Shull,at 206-244-3749,or janetshulldesign©comcastnt.We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, A41 Janet Shull,AICP Contract Planner cm: FWCC Section 22-751 Office-Retail Master Land Use Application Process IIl Development Checklist SEPA Checklist Mailing Label Handout FWCC Article XVII—Landscaping FWCC Article XIX—Community Design Guidelines Parking Stall Chart FWCC Section 22.1377—Parking Stalls CPTED Checklist FWCC Section 22-949—Garbage and Recycling Lakehaven Utilities Diagram Sign In Sheet c: Ann Dower,Engineering Plans Reviewer Some Chattopadhyay,Traffic Engineer Scott Sproul,Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury,Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham,South King Fire and Rescue uer.cmu:-Darc Down wirso SECTION III OFFSITE ANALYSIS SECTION III OFFSITE ANALYSIS Upstream The northerly 40-feet of the site is an existing access driveway which drains westerly into the existing storm drainage system in 13'h Place. No changes are proposed to this existing drainage pattern.. An insignificant portion of the area to the east of the project site drains onto the site. Runoff from that area will be picked up by the proposed storm drain system.. Downstream The stormwater from the project site is picked up in a City maintained storm drainage system within 13th Place. As this is a redevelopment project, which does not propose increased storm drainage flow rates, Level 1 downstream analysis is not required. Proposed storm flows will be released into the existing system in the same manner as the site currently drains. SECTION IV FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN SECTION IV FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The project is designed per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) for the conveyance system and water quality system design as adopted by the City of Federal Way. As this is a redevelopment project as defined by the City of Federal Way, water quality treatment is required per the KCSWDM. Since the project adds less than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface, it is exempt from flow control requirements. A. Existing Site Hydrology The project site was previously developed as an office building with associated parking areas. The 1.09 acre site can be divided into two basins. The first basin consists of the access road located along the northern border of the project site. This northern basin is 0.09 acres and is 100% impervious. The runoff from this basin flows westerly into existing storm drainage facilities located in 13th Place South. The remaining 1.00 acres makes up the southern basin and is determined to be approximately 80% impervious and 20% pervious. Overall, the site is approximately 82% impervious and 18% pervious. The existing site runoff from the southern basin flows southwesterly into the stormwater system installed along the southerly edge of the site, and within 13t Place South. The Soil Conversation Service (SCS) Maps indicate the presence of Everett-Alderwood (EvC) series soils throughout the project site (Fig. 4). As this is a mix of till and outwash soils, it is treated as till. According to FEMA FIRM Panel 53033 C 1250 F dated May 16, 1995 no 100 year floodplain is located in the project site. B. Developed Site Hydrology Under developed conditions, separate stormwater conveyance systems for the parking lot and roof drainage are proposed. Storm flows from the parking lot will be treated for water quality using a StormFilter media filtration device, then released into an existing storm structure located at the southwest corner of the site,. Storm flows from the roof drainage will bypass water quality and be released directly to the existing storm sewer. Runoff from the northern basin will continue to travel to 13th Place South; therefore the 0.09 acres in this basin will be excluded from the developed flow calculations. The overall calculated impervious coverage utilized in this analysis is 80% of the 1.00 acres of the southern basin,which does not increase from existing conditions. A basin map can be found in Section I showing basin area and flow directions C. Performance Standards New Flow Control for the proposed development is not required per the Pre-Application Conference Summary dated July 20, 2007. The on-site pipe system must convey the 25-year storm event without overtopping and convey the 100-year storm event without causing sever flooding or an erosive condition. Water Quality treatment is required for pollution generating areas of the site. An AWDT of 402 is expected for the site; therefore an oil/water separator is not required. D. Flow Control System As the project will not increase the area of impervious surfaces from existing conditions, a new Flow Control Facility is not required. Please refer to the Pre-Application Conference Summary dated July 20, 2007 in Section II. Flow Control for the site is handled by an existing 65" x 45" corrugated steel pipe-arch located along the southern edge of the project site.. The steel pipe arch is connected to manholes on both the east and west ends by 2 feet of 36" storm pipe. The combined length of storm pipe and steel pipe-arch is approximately 274' long. The entire detention system slopes to the west at approximately 0.5%. The volume of the corrugated steel pip-arch and two 2 foot 36" pipe sections is determined to be 3384.4 cubic feet. The TIR, dated November 1979, and Hydraulics Report for the original lot, dated November 1978, can be found in the appendix of this report. Included in these reports are calculations to determine required and supplied volume along with figures of the structure. E. Water Quality System A StormFilter will provide water quality treatment for both new and existing pollution generating impervious surfaces on the entire site. The StormFilter was sized to treat 60% of the 2-year, 24 hour runoff from pollution generating surfaces. For this lot the treatment area equals 0.91 acres and has a water quality rate of 0.1145 cfs. The water quality flow rate was determined by taking 60% of 0.1916 cfs, which was the 2-year, 24 hour flow. A 7 cartridge StormFilter will treat runoff prior to discharging to the storm system located in 13'h Place South. Please refer to the enclosed size and cost for details pertaining to the StormFilter. See Figure 3.2- Basin Map, found in Section 1, for location of the water quality facility. ST 1.0/ 1.2 ST 1.0 LA 0.8 LA. 0.9 LA 1.0 LA ST 1.1 SN OHOSEISII COUNTY F'/ IiAltt' E DUR/l : ONNINME; n UINo cOU1Vsr 'SA7T'`. -,•A..- ,. elr.�_t ..Is` !,. � 'I: }[..i'RE ONO '. s� ✓ _ szo 04 i" NFU• ", 6ELlEV E' � ~ J 'Aim ' ,y/C05 ,_ �f 'lil 1�� 5 � mow ��711::::::::.......10404:700, � i :'\•?-•; •ou MR e>i/ ...,Ails , Ctt '1NTOI _ nr..€ ! � M .f ' hog! J :09 �� =7 .� ! JOG 1L9 �• L.✓ +�'/•4+. r5: M , k2fi'':7::-.. ' .:/k. 69.i,/, 1 ,-- s,s 4 ...\ r I. ]`r '.' p Fes(\\ 'lam -, \ Q -_- .�• YDi f: SE ( `SENT � CI to ' '� ♦.�•� f = 1 v1 r--- i i/'J jam; 1 7 7 GUY,ND 0.54" io i _. '\ ;�`' J (OA45') 5ITE ;<`'� " b 1-4 ,....„ LRTT', , '_!MINClCOUNTY •''--\ ' ' PIERCE COUNTY y 0.47" tug (0.039') , 4.sJilulttu'wy rZIi Incorporated Area c, ►=-•` •-ra River/Lake 0.47" \-------.. b.- Major Road (0.039') 0.52" (0.0431 0.65" NOTE:Areas east of the easternmost isopluvial should use 0,65 0.56" ' (0.054') °nches unless rainfall data is available for the location of interest (0.047') 24 The mean annual storm is a conceptual storm found by dividing the annual precipitation by the total number of storm events per year Water Quality WESTERN WASHINGTON HYDROLOGY MODEL V2 PROJECT REPORT Project Name: Cedars Redesign Site Address: City Federal Way Report Date : 5/28/2008 Gage Seatac Data Start 1948 Data End 1998 Precip Scale: 1.00 PREDEVELOPED LAND USE Basin Basin 1 Flows To Point of Compliance GroundWater: No Land Use Acres TILL GRASS: 0.16 IMPERVIOUS: 0.73 DEVELOPED LAND USE Basin Basin 1 Flows To Point of Compliance Groundwater: No Land Use Acres TILL GRASS: 0.18 IMPERVIOUS: 0.73 RCHRES (POND) INFORMATION ANALYSIS RESULTS Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.191578 5 year 0.235122 10 year 0.263469 25 year 0.299032 50 year 0.325463 100 year 0.351919 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Developed Unmitigated Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.191578 5 year 0.235122 10 year 0.263469 25 year 0.299032 50 year 0.325463 100 year 0.351919 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Developed Mitigated Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.191578 5 year 0.235122 10 year 0.263469 25 year 0.299032 50 year 0.325463 100 year 0.351919 Yearly Peaks for Predeveloped and Developed-Mitigated Year Predeveloped Developed 1949 0.198 0.198 1950 0.299 0.299 1951 0.196 0. 196 1952 0.166 0.166 1953 0.152 0.152 1954 0.183 0.183 1955 0.195 0.195 1956 0.187 0.187 1957 0.217 0.217 1958 0. 194 0.194 1959 0.148 0.148 1960 0. 187 0.187 1961 0.163 0.163 1962 0.165 0.165 1963 0.160 0.160 1964 0.189 0.189 1965 0.168 0.168 1966 0.168 0.168 1967 0.252 0.252 1968 0.283 0.283 1969 0.153 0.153 1970 0.168 0.168 1971 0.161 0.161 1972 0.237 0.237 1973 0.152 0. 152 1974 0.170 0.170 1975 0.227 0.227 1976 0.153 0.153 1977 0.190 0.190 1978 0.246 0.246 1979 0.242 0.242 1980 0.210 0.210 1981 0.230 0.230 1982 0.317 0.317 1983 0.227 0.227 1984 0. 175 0.175 1985 0.163 0.163 1986 0.208 0.208 1987 0.282 0.282 1988 0.133 0.133 1989 0.167 0,167 1990 0.331 0.331 1991 0.307 0.307 1992 0.173 0.173 1993 0.117 0.117 1994 0.138 0.138 1995 0.177 0.177 1996 0.216 0.216 1997 0.206 0.206 1998 0.219 0.219 Ranked Yearly Peaks for Predeveloped and Developed-Mitigated Rank Predeveloped Developed 1 0. 3306 0.3306 2 0.3173 0.3173 3 0.3069 0.3069 4 0.2987 0.2987 5 0.2830 0.2830 6 0.2822 0.2822 7 0.2520 0.2520 8 0.2458 0.2458 9 0.2423 0.2423 10 0.2366 0.2366 11 0.2305 0.2305 12 0.2273 0.2273 13 0.2265 0.2265 14 0.2193 0,2193 15 0.2168 0.2168 16 0.2161 0.2161 17 0,2101 0.2101 18 0.2080 0.2080 19 0.2056 0.2056 20 0.1983 0.1983 21 0.1959 0.1959 22 0. 1946 0.1946 23 0.1938 0.1938 24 0.1903 0.1903 25 0.1888 0.1888 26 0.1872 0.1872 27 0.1871 0.1871 28 0.1832 0.1832 29 0.1766 0.1766 30 0.1748 0.1748 31 0.1733 0.1733 32 0.1698 0.1698 33 0. 1679 0.1679 34 0.1679 0.1679 35 0.1676 0.1676 36 0.1671 0.1671 37 0.1661 0.1661 38 0,1648 0.1648 39 0.1631 0,1631 40 0. 1626 0.1626 41 0.1612 0.1612 42 0. 1603 0.1603 43 0.1533 0.1533 44 0, 1533 0.1533 45 0.1522 0.1522 46 0.1521 0.1521 47 0.1480 0.1480 48 0. 1385 0.1385 49 0.1331 0.1331 50 0.1169 0.1169 1/2 2 year to 50 year Flow(CFS) Predev Final Percentage Pass/Fail 0.0958 1162 1162 100.0 Pass 0.0981 1042 1042 100.0 Pass 0.1004 969 969 100.0 Pass 0.1027 912 912 100.0 Pass 0.1051 816 816 100.0 Pass 0.1074 765 765 100.0 Pass 0.1097 717 717 100.0 Pass 0.1120 655 655 100.0 Pass 0.1143 616 616 100.0 Pass 0.1167 577 577 100.0 Pass 0.1190 538 538 100.0 Pass 0.1213 489 489 100.0 Pass 0.1236 460 460 100..0 Pass 0.1259 434 434 100.0 Pass 0.1283 403 403 100.0 Pass 0.1306 366 366 100..0 Pass 0.1329 347 347 100.0 Pass 0.1352 322 322 100,0 Pass 0.1375 299 299 100.0 Pass 0.1399 278 278 100.0 Pass 0.1422 248 248 100.0 Pass 0. 1445 233 233 100.0 Pass 0.1468 219 219 100.0 Pass 0.1491 207 207 100.0 Pass 0.1515 195 195 100,0 Pass 0,1538 182 182 100.0 Pass 0.1561 169 169 100.0 Pass 0.1584 158 158 100. 0 Pass 0.1607 151 151 100.0 Pass 0.1631 137 137 100.0 Pass 0.1654 127 127 100,0 Pass 0.1677 119 119 100.0 Pass 0.1700 108 108 100.0 Pass 0.1723 105 105 100.0 Pass 0-1747 96 96 100.0 Pass 0.1770 92 92 100.0 Pass 0.1793 85 85 100. 0 Pass 0.1816 81 81 100.0 Pass 0.1839 78 78 100.0 Pass 0.1863 74 74 100.0 Pass 0.1886 68 68 100 .0 Pass 0.1909 61 61 100.0 Pass 0.1932 58 58 100.0 Pass 0.1955 56 56 100.0 Pass 0.1979 49 49 100.0 Pass 0.2002 45 45 100.0 Pass 0„2025 44 44 100.0 Pass 0.2048 40 40 100.0 Pass 0.2071 3B 38 100.0 Pass 0.2095 35 35 100.0 Pass 0.2118 33 33 100.0 Pass 0 .2141 31 31 100.0 Pass 0.2164 31 31 100.0 Pass 0,2187 29 29 100.0 Pass 0.2211 27 27 100.0 Pass 0.2234 27 27 100.0 Pass 0 .2257 27 27 100,0 Pass 0.2280 25 25 100.0 Pass 0,2303 25 25 100.0 Pass 0.2327 23 23 100.0 Pass 0.2350 23 23 100.0 Pass 0.2373 19 19 100.0 Pass 0.2396 18 18 100.0 Pass 0.2419 18 18 100. 0 Pass 0.2443 15 15 100.0 Pass 0.2466 14 14 100.0 Pass 0.2489 14 14 100. 0 Pass 0.2512 13 13 100.0 Pass 0.2535 12 12 100.0 Pass 0.2559 12 12 100.0 Pass 0.2582 12 12 100.0 Pass 0.2605 11 11 100. 0 Pass 0.2628 11 11 100.0 Pass 0.2651 11 11 100.0 Pass 0.2675 10 10 100.0 Pass 0..2698 9 9 100. 0 Pass 0.2721 9 9 100. 0 Pass 0.2744 9 9 100.0 Pass 0.2767 9 9 100.0 Pass 0.2791 9 9 100.0 Pass 0.2814 9 9 100.0 Pass 0.2837 8 8 100.0 Pass 0.2860 7 7 100.0 Pass 0.2883 6 6 100.0 Pass 0.2907 6 6 100.0 Pass 0.2930 6 6 100.0 Pass 0.2953 5 5 100.0 Pass 0.2976 5 5 100 .0 Pass 0.2999 3 3 100.0 Pass 0.3023 3 3 100.0 Pass 0.3046 3 3 100.0 Pass 0.3069 3 3 100.0 Pass 0.3092 2 2 100.0 Pass 0.3115 2 2 100.0 Pass 0.3139 2 2 100.0 Pass 0.3162 2 2 100.0 Pass 0 ,3185 1 1 100. 0 Pass 0 ,3208 1 1 100.0 Pass 0.3231 1 1 100.0 Pass 0.3255 1 1 100.0 Pass Water Quality AMP Flow and Volume. On-line facility volume: 0 0929 acre-feet On-line facility target flow: 0.1037 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0.1145 cfs. Off-line facility target flow: 0.059 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0.0652 cfs. This program and accompanying documentation is provided 'as-is' without warranty of any kind The entire risk regarding the performance and results of this program is assumed by the user. Clear Creek Solutions and the Washington State Department of Ecology disclaims all warranties, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to implied warranties of program and accompanying documentation. In no event shall Clear Creek Solutions and/or the Washington State Department of Ecology be liable for any damages whatsoever (including without limitation to damages for loss of business profits, loss of business information, business interruption, and the like) arising out of the use of, or inability to use this program even if Clear Creek Solutions or the Washington State Department of Ecology has been advised of the possibility of such damages w4l%LITIEA iur 0.4104 is=�'-' Size and Cost Estimate STORMWATER SOLUTIONS INC Prepared by Kathryn Thomason on May 28,2008 Cedars Redesign -Stormwater Treatment System Federal Way, WA Information provided: • Total contributing area=0,91 acre • Impervious area=0.73 acre • Water quality flow, Qµq = 0.1145 cfs • Peak hydraulic flow rate, Qpeak= 0.352 cfs • Presiding agency=City of Federal Way Assumptions: • Media=ZPG cartridges • Flow rate per cartridge=7.5 gpm • Drop requi red from inlet to outlet= 2.3' minimum Size and cost estimates: The StormFilter is a flow-based system, and therefore, is sized by calculating the peak water quality flow rate associated with the design storm. The water quality flow rate was calculated by using WWHM with a precipitation scale of 1.0. The StormFilter for this site was sized based on a water quality flow rate of 0.1145 cfs. To accommodate this flow rate, CONTECH Stormwater Solutions recommends using a 72"Manhole StormFilter with 7 cartridges(see attached detail)., The estimated cost of this system is$25,000-$29,000,complete and delivered to the job site. This estimate assumes that the vault is 6 feet deep. The final system cost will depend on the actual depth of the units and whether extras are specified. The contractor is responsible for setting the StormFilter and all external plumbing. Typically the precast StormFilters have internal bypass capacities of 1.8 cfs. If the peak discharge off the site is expected to exceed this rate, we recommend placing a high-flow bypass upstream of the StormFilter system. CONTECH Stormwater Solutions could provide our high-flow bypass,the StorrnGate,which provides a combination weir-orifice control structure to limit the flow to the StormFilter. The estimated cost of this structure is $4,000. The final cost would depend on the actual depth and size of the unit. ©2006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions 12021-B NE Airport Way,Portland OR 97220 Page 1 of 1 contechstormwater corn Toll-free:800 548 4667 Fax:800 561 1271 TS-P027 BALLAST �Nev.,------- (SEE NOTE 8) 72°O) J ., '41( /;::: ) s;: '; .,0 R �/`, mime A /,.=1ti1: .1t� i. -.1r:, �1 ` %A j ,A,, o J , • INLET PIPE I,j N•:1 )11i� • 8°/I 2°O MOPE OUTLET (SEE NOTES 5 4 G) V , \% 1' STUB(SEE NOTES 5 4 G) N.c...., i. •4 ' . .7. MANHOLE STORMFILTER - PLAN VIEW 0 30°0 FRAME AND COVER(STD) CONCRETE (SEE NOTE 4) GRADE RING STEP(TYP) INLET PIPE �I ~11 HDPE OUTLET (SEE NOTES 5 4 G) RISER WITH SCUM BAFFLE 41 ' III I _ Fri 4'-G"MIN .. (SEE NOTE 7) (SEE BALLAST NOTE 8) I:%',N 11/11111 11,:at�.:,_:,:,i„1 1III1111r HEIGHT ^`. MANIMIW WIDTH__ I I_-- — SEE DETAIL 2/2 UNDERDRAIN STORMFILTER CARTRIDGE MANIFOLD (TYP)(SEE NOTE 2) MANHOLE STORMFILTER- SECTION VIEW A 1 THE STORMWATEP,MANAGEMENT 5tonnPIter© U 5 PATENT No 5.322,629. No 5.707.527.No G.027,639 No.G.649.048,No.5.G24,57G. AND OTHER U 5.AND FOREIGN CalillMethiffeelr136,8annwater Solutions PATENTS PENDING � 1LITr LI® PRECAST 72" MANHOLE STORMFILTER DRAWING STORMUVATER PLAN AND SECTION VIEWS SOLUTIONS. STANDARD DETAIL in contechstormwater.com DATE:09125105 I SCALE:NONE I FILE NAME:MHSF7-72PC-DTL I DRAWN:MJW I CHECKED:ARG GENERAL NOTES I)STORMFILTER BY CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUTIONS; PORTLAND, OR(800) 548-466'7; SCARBOROUGH, ME(877) 907-8676; LINTHICUM, MD(86G)740-33 18 2)FILTER CARTRIDGE(5)TO BE SIPHON-ACTUATED AND SELF-CLEANING STANDARD DETAIL SHOWS MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CARTRIDGES ACTUAL NUMBER REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED ON SITE PLANS OR IN DATA TABLE BELOW 3)PRECAST MANHOLE STRUCTURE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478 DETAIL REFLECTS DESIGN INTENT ONLY ACTUAL DIMENSIONS AND CONFIGURATION OF STRUCTURE WILL BE SHOWN ON PRODUCTION SHOP DRAWING 4)STRUCTURE AND ACCESS COVERS TO MEET AASHTO H-20 LOAD RATING 5)STORMFILTER REQUIRES 2 3 FEET OF DROP FROM INLET TO OUTLET IF LE55 DROP IS AVAILABLE,CONTACT CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUTIONS MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN INLET AND OUTLET IS 45° 6) INLET PIPING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR PRECAST MANHOLE STORMFILTER EQUIPPED WITH A DUAL DIAMETER HDPE OUTLET STUB AND SAND COLLAR EIGHT INCH DIAMETER OUTLET SECTION MAY BE SEPARATED FROM OUTLET STUB AT MOLDED-IN CUT LINE TO ACCOMMODATE A 12 INCH OUTLET PIPE CONNECTION TO DOWNSTREAM PIPING TO BE MADE USING A FLEXIBLE COUPLING OR ECCENTRIC REDUCER, A5 REQUIRED COUPLING BY FERNCO OR EQUAL AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR 7)PROVIDE MINIMUM CLEARANCE FOR MAINTENANCE ACCESS IF A SHALLOWER SYSTEM 15 REQUIRED,CONTACT CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUTIONS FOR OTHER OPTIONS 8)ANTI-FLOTATION BALLAST TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR, IF REQUIRED BALLAST TO BE SET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE STRUCTURE 9)ALL STORMFILTERS REQUIRE REGULAR MAINTENANCE REFER TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR MORE INFORMATION, ;. • -•_ .• • . 30"0 FRAME PRECAST MANHOLE 7.: AND COVER(STD) STORM FI LTER DATA ' STRUCTURE ID CB#I $ . ,' WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE(cis) 0.2 I • •\,' PEAK FLOW RATE(<I.5 cfs) 0.90 ;j "^ RETURN PERIOD OF PEAK FLOW(yrs) 100 ...........)' • .:" • I • #OF CARTRIDGES REQUIRED 7 •; • • •' ,, •• •' CARTRIDGE FLOW RATE(I 5 or 7.5 gpm) 7.5 MEDIA TYPE(CSF, PERLITE, ZPG) ZPG • •:/ ; RIM ELEVATION 328.63 / " PIPE DATA: I.E. ORIENTATION MATERIAL DIAMETER • ,. _INLET PIPE#1 325,6' 151° PVC 12" • .�;'. '•�•-- . INLET PIPE#2 323.I' 233° PVC 12" •• OUTLET STUB 320.8' 0° PVC 8"/12" MANHOLE STORMFILTER - TOP VIEW 411 ECCENTRIC REDUCER YES\NO SIZE (BY CONTRACTOR) YES 72"x 30" ANTI-FLOTATION BALLAST WIDTH HEIGHT OUTLET SAND COLLAR N/A N/A RISER _ F,,, 12°0 OUTLET STUB NOTES/SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: PIPE ORIENTATION KEY: MOLDED-IN CUT LINE 90° .4" 8"0 OUTLET STUB 1 f80°— 0° �; III _ 270° III Iii iii cn� liii �� % A� ir OUTLET PIPE (BY CONTRACTOR) COUPLING (BE CONTRACTOR) (SEE NOTE 6) BALLAST GROUT (SEE NOTE 8) me STORMWATCR MANAGEMENT (BY CONTRACTOR) S 5 U S PATENIJT N fJo 5.322.629. MANHOLE STORMFILTER - OUTLET DETAIL 0 No 5.707.527.No 6.027.639 No.6.G49,045,No 5 G24,576. p�� AND OTHER U,5.AND FOREIGN 0 6 2GhlirI6l$t03rmwater Solutions PATENTS FENDING A l\ITEAL1® PRECAST 72" MANHOLE STORMFILTER DRAWING ii AWM • ram:? STORMWATER TOP AND SECTION VIEWS, NOTES AND DATA 2 �-• SOLUTIONS. STANDARD DETAIL zn contechstormwater.com DATE:09/26)05 SCALE:NONE I FILE NAME:MHSF7-72PC-DTL I DRAWN:MJW ICHECM(ED:ARG SECTION V CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN SECTION V CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Narrative The computer modeling software that was used for the drainage calculations is called StormSHED. This software is a comprehensive hydrology model previously known as Water Works. This software is used to compute storm runoff hydrographs for drainage areas, and then route the resulting flows through a network that may include ditches, channels, gutters, pipes, culverts, flow structures, storage detention ponds, infiltration ponds, and reservoirs for both rural and municipal storm sewer analysis and design. StormSHED can be used to estimate detention and infiltration pond volumes and size the ditches, channels, and pipes feeding the detention structures. StormSHED provides complete support for the Windows clipboard, allowing the user to copy the computed hydrograph plots and output reports directly into a word processor. The design stormwater precipitations were based on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) isopluvial maps and are shown in the table below. Storm Event 2 year 10 year 25 year 100 year 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour Precipitation (in) 2.06 2.94 3.40 4.15 The initial tailwater depth is set to the existing rim elevation of the flow-restrictor/oil pollution control device. This depth of 323 feet was chosen because it is assumed to be the worst case scenario when the existing detention system was designed,thus making it a conservative assumption. A diagram of the flow-restrictor/oil pollution control device, along with stormwater calculations, can be found in the TIR and Hydraulics Report for the existing lot; these reports are located in the Appendix of this report. The developed stormwater drainage basins for the southern basin were defined based on the proposed parking lot grading, topography of the site, and the proposed storm drainage system. Figure 3.2—Basin Map in Section I shows the drainage basins and the catch basin contributing areas, The on-site conveyance system contains pipes of 12-inch diameter. The pipes run at a minimum slope of 0.5%. Design flows yield velocities in excess of 2 feet per second. The system is initially sized for the 25-year 24-hour design storm with the 25-year hydraulic grade line at least 0.5 feet below each rim elevation as required by the King County Surface Water Design Manual. The 100-year 24-hour design storm is then evaluated to determine if any of the structures overtop. Overtopping of the 100-year event is acceptable provided it does not result in severe erosive or flooding conditions. The land coverage for the Cedars Redesign project was calculated as 80% impervious surface and 20% pervious landscaping. The developed sub-basins for Cedars Redesign were each measured to calculate the pervious and impervious area. The Time of Concentration for each individual basin is set at 6.3 minutes, the minimum value per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Cedars Redesign Basin Areas for StormShed 2G Calculations Sub Basin# Total Area Impervious Pervious Peak Flow(cfs) (Acres) (Acres) (Acres) 25 yr 100 yr CB-01 0 0 0 0 0 CB-02 0.17 0.136 0.034 0.12 0.15 C8-03 0.25 0.2 0.05 0.19 0.23 CB-04 0.25 0.2 0.05 0.19 0.23 CB-05 0.16 0.128 0.032 0.12 0.15 Total 0.83 0.664 0.166 0.62 0.76 Cedars Redesign Storm Drain Network Map CB-05 L1 CB05- B04 CB-0 (31 CB-03 CB04 CB01 "" CB-02 CB03�f- 2r02- C 1 __ CB01- 01 EX 01 i Record Id: B-002 Design Method - -- j SBUH (Rainfall type --ui j TYPBIA IHyd Intv 10 00 min (Peaking Factor ? 484.00 IAbsfraction Coeff-.__._._...._____..3.._____0 20 ____ 'Pervious Area(AMC 2) 0.03 ac DCIA ? 0.14 ac [Pervious CN 90.00 DC CN i 98.00 ;Pervious TC _ - 6.30 min DC TC 6.30 min Pervious CN Cale I .LI __...._..___. ...._. - Description .... .. .._... p ' SubArea j Sub cn ;___--.____-- ___......_-_..! 0.00 E Lands Pervious Composited CN(AMC 2) 0.03 ac 90.00 1 Pervious TC Cale T e Description Length Slope Coeff I Misc I TT YP P gi (Fixed 6.30 min I I I I Pervious TC 6.30 min ' Directly Connected CN Cale I 11 Description 1 SubArea 1 Sub en Impervious_.__.............- _._._. __._-- 0.14 ac I .—_.._ 98.00 _..._._ I DC Composited CN(AMC 2) 1 98.00 j IDirectly Connected TC Cale li Type Description I Length I Slope I Coeff Misc I TT 11 ;Fixed Parking Lot 1 16.30 min !I Directly Connected TC 1 6 30min Record Id: B-003 ;Design Method ----- SBUH (Rainfall type TYPElA Hyd Intv 10.00 min "Peaking Factor j 484.00 3W !Abstraction Coeff -.V----, 0.20 -- !Pervious Area(AMC 2) I 0.05 ac _ IDCIA 0 20 ac 'Pervious CN --� 90.00 IDC CN 98 00 -� !Pervious TC 6.30 min IDC TC j 6.30 min Pervious CN Cale Description I SubArea I Sub cn Landscape Area 0,05 ac I 90,00 ; Pervious Composited CN(AMC 2) I 90.00 Pervious TC Cale 1 i I Type j Description I Length I Slope , Coeff I Misc TT !Fixed j I6.30 min I! — — Pervious TC -- I 6.30 min ` - - Directly Connected CN Cale _ — Description I SubArea Sub en 1; Impervious I 0.20 ac j 98.00 j 1 DC Composited CN(AMC 2) 98.00 Directly Connected TC Cale I Type Description I Length I Slope " Coeff I Misc I TT 'Fixed "Parking Lot 1 6.30 min Directly Connected TC I 6.30mm Record Id: B-004 Design Method SBUH Rainfall type _— • TYPEIA Hyd Intv 10.00 min !Peaking Factor 484.00 • j !Abstraction Coeff 0.20 ;Pervious Area(AMC 2) 0.05 ac !DCIA 0.20 ac ;Pervious CN 90 00 IDC CN j 98.00 ;Pervious TC 6.30 min IDC TC j 6.30 min Pervious CN Cale I Description 1 SubArea r Sub en j Landscape Area I 0.05 ac 1 90.00 ! j Pervious Composited CN(AMC 2) 90.00 11 Pervious TC Cale Type j Description j Length i Slope . Coeff 1 Mr• sc I TT 1 — I Fixed I 6.30 min s Pervious TC I 6.30 min f -I� ____•---Directly Connected CN Cale — �- f Description I SubArea Sub cn Impervious [ 0.20 ac 98 00 II DC Composited CN(AMC 2) 98.00 Directly Connected TC Calc 1 Type Description Length I Slope j Coeff ! Misc TT Fixed !Parking Lot I ' 16 30 min _— ._.. Directly Connected TC !W 6 30min Record Id: B-005 _ 1Design Method SBUH (Rainfall type — —TYPE1A IHyd Intv J 10.00 min (Peaking Factor ! 484 00 i�--. j (Abstraction Coeff 0.20-- !Pervious Area(AMC 2) 0.03 ac IDCIA 0 13 ac !Pervious CN 90.00 IDC CN y 98.00 !Pervious TC - __.6 30 min IDC TC j 6.30 min __ Pervious CN Cale — Description SubArea Sub cn Landscape Area 1 0.03 ac I 90 00 Pervious Composited CN AMC 2) I 90 00 11 Pervious TC Cale I j Type j Description I Length I Slope j Coeff I Misc I TT !Fixed I 1 I6.30 min 11 Pervious TC 1 6 30 min --^ —Directly Connected CN Cale 1 Description [ SubArea Sub cn i Impervious 0.13 ac 98.00 I DC Composited CN(AMC 2) 98.00 Directly Connected TC Cale ! 1 Type ! Description ( Length I Slope I Coeff ! Misc I TT ! !Fixed IParking Lot 1 16.30 min 1 I Directly Connected TC I. 6.30min J 25 Year 24 Hour Storm Event 25-YEAR 24 HOUR STORM EVENT CONVEYANCE ROUTEHYD []THRU [Untitled] USING TYPE1A AND [25 year] NOTZERO RELATIVE SCS/SBUH Area Flow Full Q Full nDepth nVel fVel CBasin/ Reach ID (ac) (cfs) (cfs) ratio (ft) Size (ft/s) (ft/s) Hyd CB05-CB04 0.163 0.119 2.551 0.05 0.147 12"Diam 1.662 3.2483 B-005 CB04-CBO1 0.418 0.306 2.526 0.12 0.2349 12"Diam 2.176 3.2163 B-004 CB03-CB02 0.253 0.185 9.586 0.02 0.0962 12" Diam 4.793 12.205 B-003 CB02-CB01 0.423 0.31 2.88 0.11 0.2212 12" Diam 2.397 3.6671 B-002 CB01-EX01 0.841 0.615 2.526 0.24 0.3364 12" Diam 2.651 3.2163 25-YEAR 24 HOUR STORM EVENT BACKWATER ROUTEHYD []THRU [Untitled] USING TYPE1A AND [25 year] NOTZERO RELATIVE SCS/SBUH Max El- From To Rch Loss Bend Junct HW Loss Max El HW Node Node (ft) App(ft) (ft) Loss(ft) Elev(ft) (ft) Loss Elev(ft 323 No approach losses at node CB-02 because inverts and/or crowns are offset. CB-01 EX-01 323.0174 323.0174 328.6 5.5826 CB-04 CB-01 323.8231 0.0429 0.0187 323.7989 326.57 2.7711 CB-05 CB-04 323.9984 ------ ----- 323.9984 328.05 4.0516 CB-02 CB-01 326.1078 0.3568 0.0023 325.7534 329.39 3.6366 CB-03 CB-02 333.002 - - 333.002 335.8 2.798 100 Year 24 Hour Storm Event 100-YEAR 24 HOUR STORM EVENT CONVEYANCE ROUTEHYD []THRU [Untitled] USING TYPE1A AND [100 year] NOTZERO RELATIVE SCS/SBUH Area Full Q Full nDepth nVel fVel CBasin/ Reach ID (ac) Flow(cfs) (cfs) ratio (ft) Size (ft/s) (ft/s) Hyd CB05-CB04 0.163 0.146 2.551 0.06 0.1626 12" Diam 1.76 3.2483 B-005 CB04-CB01 0.418 0.375 2.526 0.15 0.2603 12" Diam 2.307 3.2163 8-004 CB03-CB02 0.253 0.227 9.586 0.02 0.106 12" Diam 5.097 12.205 B-003 CB02-CB01 0.423 0.379 2.88 0.13 0.2446 12" Diam 2.547 3.6671 8-002 CB01-EX01 0.841 0.754 2.526 0.3 0.3745 12" Diam 2.808 3.2163 100-YEAR 24 HOUR STORM EVENT BACKWATER ROUTEHYD []THRU [Untitled] USING TYPE1A AND [100 year] NOTZERO RELATIVE SCS/SBUH From To Rch Loss Bend Junct HW Loss Max El Max El- Node Node (ft) App(ft) (ft) Loss(ft) Elev(ft) (ft) HW Loss Elev(ft 323 No approach losses at node CB-02 because inverts and/or crowns are offset. CB-01 EX-Ol 323.0261 ----- ------ ----- 323.0261 328.6 5.5739 CB-04 CB-01 323.8594 0.0481 0.021 323.8322 326.57 2.7378 CB-05 CB-04 324.0203 ------ 324.0203 328.05 4.0297 CB-02 CB-01 326.1432 0.4035 0.0026 ----- 325.7423 329.39 3.6477 CB-03 CB-02 333.0283 ----- 333.0283 335.8 2.7717 SECTION VI SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY ``. EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED J Environmental Services t7 Geotechnical Engineering O Construction Materials Testing Cl Special Inspections January 3, 2008 Mr. Tom Pierson Celebration Terrace, LLC P.O. Box 502 Milton, Washington 98354 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY UPDATE CEDARS REDESIGN SHELL AND CORE 33430 13TH PLACE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WASHINGTON Project No. E-9967-1 Reference: Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study E-9967, December 26, 2001. Dear Mr. Pierson: As requested, Earth Consulting Incorporated (ECl) is pleased to present this letter updating the geotechnical engineering study for the proposed building located at 33430 13th Place South in Federal Way, Washington. We previously prepared the referenced geotechnical engineering study for the site. In preparing for this update, we reviewed the referenced study, project plans, and visited the site to observe existing conditions. Project Description We understand it is proposed to develop the site with a new commercial building. Based on information provided, the building will consist of one partially below-grade story and two above-grade stories. The building will be situated in the middle of the site with paved parking and access roads around the building. Based on our site visit, the site has remained unchanged since the time of our study. 1805 136'h Place Northeast#201 • Bellevue,WA 98005 • (425)643-3780 • Fax(425)746-0860 eci@eci-mti corn • www.eci-mti corn GEOTECHN1CAL ENGINEERING STUDY UPDATE E-9967-1 January 3.2008 • • Discussion and Recommendations In our opinion, the recommendations presented in the referenced study are still applicable and may continue to be used for this project. Based on our review of the project plans and the referenced study, the proposed excavation for the building may extend below the maximum depth of our explorations. Based on the soil conditions encountered in our explorations, the site soils become denser with increased depth. We anticipate suitable soils will be encountered at subgrade elevations for the building however, ECl should be requested on site to observe foundation subgrade conditions as they are exposed. Since the referenced study was prepared, the City of Federal Way has adopted the International Building Code (IBC). The IBC seismic design section provides a series of soil types that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that Site Class C, "Very dense soil and soft rock"from Table 1615.1.1, should be used for design. En accordance with section 1615.1.2 site seismic coefficients are Sme= 1.22 and Smi =0.56 We trust this information meets your needs. If you have any questions, please call. Respectfully submitted, 4 EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED .,.4, 0 •'8dr, 4;dl `. q11.6 G �7 i>3 itht c '• P A ifl) Steve J. Scharf, L Kristina M.Weller, PE Senior Staff Geologist Principal SJSJKMWlskp EARTH CONSULTING INCORPORATED Page 2 _ :l ._j .... ,: ... .a . :) :fr l�G .OT NIC: 'hER N S.TUDY~�''-�'•': .•'..L'�,:N G�1-i A E G f+l.G . ..: ... .. ..... . -.. .. .., .. . . ,.... ,..OP D'PRU. � f -•N' L>'BUIt�•1NG'.,` ''<': N? ... . R,. ,O.S O A Q : _ 7H•. 33. .30: .13.-: •.RLACE`BOUT-, 4. H:; ERA VIfA. WAS f G O L = :i: 97_ - I - =f)e a be �2 0'f'� .1. PR PARED �TR�CDEfIlIARIC�;CORf?p RATIp�I=�' I a.. I�kl ......:.. . • -:a g•s:i c'1^1 r f�1 1 r .` _••:am:....�:...::-: ...�:+", sir Q - x lr.V EtP'1REs:oz�i�a: .. - �I ...,! :..,:,.::..:y•.,..:.•:,..,..:7:s....,-•::::.••:,..r.:::::....;.4.•:...:::•-•;:.,[... .igrt ).........:::...!....-:...,.,.)::::.....-,....:::,:.!---..... s...;:..-,:,--:,..,.......,*:.....::,::::.,*1:..L.:::-.....:.:::,,....;...,,.,,,:;.:,••••,:i.......!.:,..,..,:-..::•;::-.•::...;. ^ ;.: ' :K:fe.R ''Cam beft F. P. Y +. ':Prin.i::al`:c F , .. ... .. . s E�r#li`Cohsi{ta�.ts :inc,, ';3� P 6.�;:. t hsa 0 2 '1� rt o 1 h�. t c t_..- : ...', ...:.. .:... • _. , .. :.:';:. f3eltwue•',Ntashin"ton:9$OQ5' : 1`6 3 oII::F e �:'i=8 7 r e� 3 =66. t)%� 88.. 9- IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions.their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be.their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years,due in tion design Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer,no matter how the Geosciences qualified.and no subsurface exploration program.no The following suggestions and observations are offered earth. how comprehensive.can reveal what is hidden by to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, earth.rock and time The actual interface between mate- cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can vials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report occur during a construction project indicates Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from predictions Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated,but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact For this reason.most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage,to iden- tify variances,conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed.and to recommend solutions to problems A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- encountered on site face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of project-specific factors.These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved.its size and CAN CHANGE configuration;the location of the structure on the site and its orientation;physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- access roads,parking lots,and underground utilities, changing natural forces Because a geotechnical engi- and the level of additional risk which the dient assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration.construction decisions program To help avoid costly problems,consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time Speak with the geo- which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are affect its recommendations advisable before construction starts Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods,earthquakes or ground- be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions •When the nature of the proposed structure is and.thus.the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical changed.for example.if an office building will be report The geotechnical engineer should be kept erected instead of a parking garage.or if a refriger- apprised of any such events,and should be consulted to ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary frigerated one; •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified; •when there is a change of ownership.or Geotechnical engineers'reports are prepared to meet • •for application to an adjacent site the specific needs of specific individuals A report pre- • • Geotechinical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor.or even some other ered in their report's development have changed consulting civil engineer.Unless indicated otherwise, this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the dient.Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL"FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the client ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES fora different purpose,may result in problems.No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken,when engineer No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. dp4 44 . r�,�, Earth Consultants Inc. Cieote.hnical Engineers Geoingisis&Environmental Scie ntisls December 26, 2001 E-9967 Trademark Corporation 2000 — 124t Avenue Northeast Bellevue, Washington 98005. Attention: Mr. Steve Willard Dear Mr. Willard: We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Professional Building, 33430 — 13th Place South, Federal Way, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our December 6, 2001 proposal. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the project can be constructed generally as planned. Building support may be provided using conventional spread and continuous foundation systems bearing on competent native soils or on structural fill used to modify site grades. Slab-on-grade floors may be similarly supported. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Kristina M. Weller, P.E. Project Manager KMW/KRcrtmp 1805-136th Place N.E,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(425)643-3780 FAX(425)746-0860 Toll Free(888)739-6670 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-9967 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 1 Surface 1 Subsurface 2 Groundwater 2 Laboratory Testing 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 4 Foundations 5 Retaining and Foundation Walls 7 Slab-on-Grade Floors 7 Seismic Design Considerations 8 Excavations and Slopes 8 Site Drainage.. 9 Utility Support and Backfill 10 Pavement Areas 11 LIMITATIONS 11 Additional Services 12 Earth Consultants, no. TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued E-9967 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail Plate 4 Utility Trench Backfill APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A7 Test Pit Logs Appendix B Laboratory Test Results Plate B1 Grain Size Analyses Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 33430 - 13TH PLACE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON E-9967 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed Professional Building in Federal Way, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and based on the conditions encountered to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. Project Description We understand it is planned to develop the site with a one story professional building with asphalt-surfaced parking. At the time our study was performed, the site, proposed building locations, and our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The proposed development will include asphalt-surfaced parking and driveway areas. We anticipate traffic will consist of passenger vehicles and occasional service and delivery trucks. If the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site is located at 33430 - 13"' Place South (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The site is approximately rectangular in shape, extending about 200 feet in the east-west direction and 238 feet in the north-south direction. The site is bordered on the west by 13t Place South, on the east by forested, undeveloped property and on the north and south by existing office buildings. Earth Consultant'',!no. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 2 An existing slab and foundations from a previous building and asphalt paving currently occupy the site. The site topography slopes down gently from the north to the south with about ten feet of elevation change across the site. Subsurface Subsurface conditions were evaluated by excavating six test pits at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pit Logs, Plates A2 through A7, for a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. Our test pits indicate the landscaped areas of the site are immediately underlain by a four inch thick layer of topsoil and rootmass. This soil unit is characterized by its brown to black color and the presence of organic material. This soil layer is not considered suitable for use in support of foundations, slabs-on-grade, or pavements. In addition, it is not suitable for use as a structural fill, nor should it be mixed with material to be used as structural fill. Underlying the topsoil in Test Pit TP-2 on the landscaping berm on the east side of the site and Test Pit TP-6 in the landscaping on the northwest corner of the existing slab, we encountered about two to three feet of fill. The fill consisted of silty sand with gravel (Unified Classification SM). This soil unit may be suitable for use as structural fill. The native soil consists of two to four feet of medium dense silty sand with gravel underlain by very dense silty sand with gravel. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was not encountered in our test pits. The contractor should be made aware that groundwater is not static. There will be fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). Earth Conaultnnta,Ina. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 3 Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgment. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, It is our opinion the proposed development can be constructed generally as planned. Building support may be provided using conventional spread and continuous foundation systems bearing on competent native soils or on structural fill used to modify site grades. Slab-on-grade floors may be similarly supported. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Trademark Corporation and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 4 Site Preparation and General Earthwork Based on the preliminary site plan, it appears site grading will consist of grading the site to provide a level building pad, installing underground utilities, grading the parking areas and constructing Keystone walls on the north side of the building: We can provide a design for the Keystone walls once the heights have been finalized. The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of foundations, slabs, existing pavements, surface vegetation, organic matter, and other deleterious material. Existing utility pipes to be abandoned should be plugged or removed so that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and stability problems. Based on the thickness of the topsoil layer, encountered at our test pit locations, we estimate a stripping depth of four inches. Stripped materials should not be mixed with materials to be used as structural fill. Following the stripping, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, or slabs are to be placed should be observed by a representative of ECI. Proofrolling may be necessary in order to identify soft or unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Soil in loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill. The optional use of a geotextile fabric placed directly on the overexcavated surface may help to bridge unstable areas. The soils encountered during the site exploration are moisture sensitive due to their high fines content. As such, in an exposed condition, they will become disturbed from normal construction activity, especially when in a wet or saturated condition. Once disturbed, in a wet condition, they will be unsuitable for support of foundations, slabs, or pavements. Therefore, during construction where these soils are exposed and will support new structures, care must be exercised not to disturb their condition. Consideration should be given to placement of rock or other methods to protect exposed native, undisturbed soils that will support foundations or new structural fill. If disturbed conditions develop, the affected soils must be removed and replaced with structural fill. The depth of removal will be dependent on the level of disturbance developed during construction. Given the above, a summer earthwork schedule is recommended. Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 5 Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near their optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. During dry weather, most soils which are compactible and non-organic can be used as structural fill. Based on the results of our laboratory tests, the soil at the time of our exploration appears to near to slightly over the optimum moisture content and should be suitable for use as structural fill, provided the grading operations are conducted during dry weather and the soil can be moisture conditioned. Based on laboratory testing, the native soil has between 19 and 26 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. Soil with fines in this range will degrade if exposed to excessive moisture, and compaction and grading will be difficult if the soil moisture increases significantly above its optimum condition. If the native soil is exposed to moisture and cannot be compacted then it may be necessary to import a soil which can be compacted. During dry weather, most non- organic compactible soil with a maximum particle size of six inches can be used. Fill for use during wet weather should consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum particle size of six inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. A contingency in the earthwork budget should be included for this possibility. Foundations Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed building may be supported on a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation bearing on competent native soil or on structural fill used to modify site grades. For frost protection considerations, exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas, where interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches. Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 6 With foundation support obtained as described, for design, an allowable bearing capacity of two thousand five hundred (2,500) pounds per square foot (psf) for structural fill or competent native soil can be used. The allowable bearing capacity may be increased to six thousand (6,000) psf for foundations supported on the very dense silty sand with gravel encountered at three to five feet below the existing ground surface. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Loading of this magnitude would be provided with a theoretical factor-of-safety in excess of three against actual shear failure. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a one-third increase in the above allowable bearing capacities can be used. With structural loading as expected, total settlement In the range of one inch is anticipated with differential movement of about one-half inch. Most of the anticipated settlements should occur during construction as dead loads are applied. Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against the competent native soils or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of .40 can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred fifty (350) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). These lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor-of-safety of 1.5 has been included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. Footing excavations should be observed by a representative of ECI, prior to placing forms or rebar, to verify that conditions are as anticipated in this report. Earth Consultants,Inc- GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 7 Retaining and Foundation Walls Retaining walls and foundation walls that act as retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the retained soils. Walls that are designed to yield can be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty-five (35) pcf. If walls are to be restrained at the top from free movement, the equivalent fluid weight should be increased to fifty (50) pcf. These values are based on horizontal backfill and that surcharges due to backfill slopes, hydrostatic pressures, traffic, structural loads or other surcharge loads will not act on the wall. If such surcharges are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressure. The passive pressure and friction coefficients previously provided in the Foundations section are applicable to retaining walls. If design against earthquake loading is desired, a rectangular pressure distribution equal to six times the wall height (6H) should be added to the above lateral earth pressure values. In order to reduce the potential for hydrostatic forces building up behind the walls, retaining walls should be backfilled with a suitable free-draining material extending at least eighteen (18) inches behind the wall. The remainder of the backfill should consist of structural fill. The free-draining backfill should conform to the WSDOT specification for gravel backfill for walls (WSDOT 9-03.12(2)). A perforated drainpipe should be placed at the base of the wall and should be surrounded by a minimum of one cubic foot per lineal foot with three-eighths inch pea gravel. Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on competent native soil subgrade or on structural fill. Disturbed subgrade soil must either be recompacted or replaced with structural fill. Concrete slabs resting on soil ultimately cause the moisture content of the underlying soils to rise. This results from continued capillary rise and the ending of normal evapotranspiration. As concrete is permeable, moisture will eventually penetrate the slab resulting in a condition commonly known as a "wet slab" and poor adhesion of floor coverings. Therefore, if slab moisture is a concern, the slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane may be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Earth Consultants.Ina. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 8 Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 in the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity, however, the majority of these events are of such low magnitude they are not detected without instruments. Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.1 magnitude earthquake in the Olympia area, the 1965, 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Midway area and the February 29, 2001, 6.8 magnitude earthquake near Olympia. There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event at this site: ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground motion response. Ground Rupture: The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Surface faulting from these deep events has not been documented to date. Therefore, it is our opinion, that the risk of ground rupture during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. Liquefaction: Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. Based on the density of the site soils, it is our opinion the potential for liquefaction over the site during a seismic event is negligible. Ground Motion Response: In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, soil type Sc should be used in design. Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 9 In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, the existing fill and medium dense silty sand would be classified as Type C by OSHA. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped at an inclination of 1.5H:1 V (Horizontal:Vertical). The very dense native soil would be classified as Type A by OSHA. In Type A soils temporary cuts greater than four feet in height can be steepened to 3/4H:1 V. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria. Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. Cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of slopes. Permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Drainage Groundwater seepage was not encountered in our test pits, however if seepage is encountered in foundation or grade beam excavations during construction, the bottom of the excavation should be sloped to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive and permanent discharge, such as a nearby storm drain. Depending on the magnitude of such seepage, it may also be necessary to interconnect the sump pits by a system of connector trenches. The appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, should be established during grading operations by ECI's representative at which time the seepage areas, if present, may be more clearly defined. Earth Consultants,Inc GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 10 During construction, the site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water must not be allowed to stand in areas where buildings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved areas, which can be sloped at a gradient of 2 percent. Footing drains should be installed around the building perimeters, at or just below the invert of the footing, with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. A typical detail is provided on Plate 3. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain system. Roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered, the soils expected to be exposed by utility excavations should provide adequate support for utilities. The site soils are slightly over the optimum moisture content and may need to be moisture conditioned prior to their use in utility backfill. Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve inches above the crown of the pipe before heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 4. Earth Conauttants,trio. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 11 Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for pavements, the subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation section of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (per ASTM D-1557-91), It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may stilt exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. The following pavement section can be used for lightly-loaded areas (car traffic): • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. We will be pleased to assist in developing appropriate pavement sections for heavy traffic zones, if needed. Pavement materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. The use of a Class B asphalt mix is suggested. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided us, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied, Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Trademark Corporation E-9967 December 26, 2001 Page 12 The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Additional Services As the geotechnical engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. Earth Consultants,Ina. J.i •Tiq.=:J 4a "1 i:� J .0 _ l' • '3 iC` i - ' ."— •.. .N a;�-ft: lEE 4. _• byJ'ci "• ' C , ii P 'S: , {.t !� �� - c f, • � :�. l- t 4 -.. 4- r 5 rijr4 �„_ ? f j.+y _$ ^. /k'_ 7 '1� e'sW t{* t i 1.&At r�t. 5 ip l fyT6� a 4..� ,ty., i}!.:71 'G- ^r k�r t i d+l' N.I.Lc. l f .. Y�q� f — JJ -. y/�qJ�� wy +J.+^x' ff A { y}z-r • - f. i.Cv r4sV n"S 5{ ? Ci f dA�d� ; :v��3��1 c4T C frfrl�G wy A S F „r •,fit" j • Q• • +L.1',. c 'tf7 /+'�S'f 7�.�.., 'r yA " rp'yyL�!fii J ei a m t`. .:it. .w, i { �," � ".y,.f^'•l' "_'1 i. .. yam. ,5 _ 'T"' y it y 11. �5 ., t1n r` ,F F.r � • c aj -i-. r. ' C:'''Will'..:.y •tj •� �S'• t ,qn... (,c1 r y'•,fa�ynt'` -. • •rt:,: .ii. r ni F,� l f 1. r e,,, �-.L vXw v �ffs r L .:.. ;. � ��..,r_t,:.�.'v:... ✓y�Kf :- rt f { zd � 1 •k'' iY3 ".+,xr'3 a 1H 1'7'� tl!" ` ` 7 Er"..t ::Ff Riy'. '..713.•;l '-;'6 >t !„4 ^ fi" t - `�, 1 i A- r 'p' .sir L.. Y:,,i G t'•::��1. r� + . t• a,.y _ r, { ? ^xr'AT„rsS. 4 w's r .wd� {,G '� if of } , . rT �. ; I S, g f.K LY 3�''• L:Z ,,,� 4t,,,.. �_'4- •e?M fiF ---.A.zi- ......................... € - S•. r•i! /� i * ✓� 3; .. . ;:lit'�.tttt�s�4 1y Y sZ'� .-". .: T.4'. . 4 :$ 4e� i t e ` r.r wig �„r.e ," 11T /'^ • P?4 .- +3` }3r* i';'` ,..' 1 rr� "'i"6 x .i.ir t ti i r' ' -F: .a, r.} 3Z8l. ,fj"Y3m 1tr f •w s H '. Y "'f:` a r... •■ t . .4 .' ; .f r - s '}✓•., i "�11F+piny 5d; Y^... .-. ,dy�ia• /3 . : f t itan t�V� � CS .e f 4 it'j S• S �. i_ .� �;r,'77 FI . ac:., q, '� "f • -s1S1- �t 1' 1."- ' �•C Yt n £r r i u J• i .t t yy 1 Q •.. •*+'fy: gl s w•4,/,*,otilE^'f `' aaY•• r r, t * r i 1� t ? { t V• • ,r :1 •':?'.'1'.Rir;"_,'St� :^r-� 9ia7 r' �. : 1 .�'•"txiiiis4'i('"-4,^4." i ri'C' `N 4 : L„ t .. ..r• 4 n a"tifi5f ri i t n if" AL t �` rs..`slK r?j'1 ZM scs�t. •}`•'•'; +at"' �"5.''�•�-" a32f '1 ti £A'"_ A.,, •�. • ._ J c`f' P �''"�Gt ^t`� >•w• G.•t' 3 1 k' f - "S•+ r- 'Pi.t".`e_ L'r'1 `�G, . ..�,L'� r a cr t C•�tt, t!. ^� flu . � r- f 4'3 ti.:S ty. •a i R- 7 �jf�tr� ,E"L(."4..r {yt v .r. c 7. '^t�y.�'rs i •��L y + • 1-i` iir ti : efi411, �R +'.,:i44 3 N i �' >F t ` t` s t 9� i,• *if: a 5ts '- ,01'4 4t k; fcf f .:etw:' .Y '>4; Zra r y r� (, .�Ya tlxIZ-• f 17 JJ"•il'i +i..rr it rs lam; i C�` :•,:i~ ." .N. , ct•, r ar'�t r,3. • 's /„�, •...: s,.} -714 -`a L 'g'.;s. a k. 'i .1k t 't r. r r. '~•• r c„ai .-_ r'•.', W- s • 2 SY ?fv -r'!2 4t•c. `: rbF fi- 4�'"`_ni'N 4ti , i7' P4 et . • • • •! XTI $t_ ''-S f44 `� ,' `;5p 4. s'�+Y f+y,( • -. v s4, . 3 f4 t ea •h.: rr� t i f a , 3 ' - .� , _ ,fric-, • ., - f ••>S t {i S ti rs�s y.*t%';_ iS•1.✓ 5 a..i� - �`�� ter- SPt iF �"'iiS h. ki f. k 'if•" •.*qia, N�•_3 -• '3A> (.: C .,; •tiu„w S':-.4V 4f 4 4 iL.4. t � s �t+�fd�- i t,4a � } _ '+s*I ".; f. ,t ,, ,s .,:..L t.L :t . •;.r , �73 jf•^. ?`.•7 I 4 1& 3 �:., i f,, ..~r�.Il,. .�" “ �; r�7"cF''+„c• al. rtrr'ys i-'t s •=1*-)Y f s 7. I,i1 rf•icAr `Sjj ,y .3" rE.,,,'` ;-'_ g /k; .✓; t .i +t st HA i ,V tl"it. f 1 kiikt+, rrs �r? �F }'" r k cN + 5f.^l. 1 .r e'y, i'L .P`9 a c t y: r•( a 'r 7 . '?" 3 w R I. + A i�f. iL j ik 1 r i f 44.7; t� ,, b +y}Y 7 i ,i iiiiiT`. •f • f t. „ yT 7. i•_f cY "F v •+•.� ,, �z t•-i 7� f i ,� ..�,2 1 '_>t .- ff�i' b r a 7{{�arch f " Tf,,,r „,y t.s,, i i .k�_Fes, " „:.t -s € ,1'+ ^ rt� � .r. ki4- '�'' is 3fyr F i Y A- f,.4t .'`i,, „A,Yv, 4 TJ j`. ,',,,•t• iL L t r d " 1':tar - n''�, SA r n tA•_ r41;,.�i. •4 r'Eta i ..i y .• ...r. s gt }4 f Y a: Y' 7 1 •• 1` • Tt`•' "' • fi 'i•� •C.4 Z' -'+j-�.` •at.. (,,U ,jt.L 4.F 4, •L.t412 ar 7�'r- • s` 34 C sl '.1 ui1`I ?.1,4.7i:X ) E r' t . r i+'(.rr , t rfi 1(f, .,y'E.i :;g4:: i•44 �1, { �'1.]1 � S f { S f _ r 1,3 R o i b)•i •,Sr}}'> L +"`t� L� ,.X 6Th f 3 i� 1y r -- ! r n r'• Y• ',y N.'' 4 1 ...s' '" T a Y . .•,-x•�- l� L r'/. f.- - C 4 ti i r S .r. 1 - vr• , y y 5 r f -i 1. i f t Pf^t 4 '/x } t..; ,•:.1 t f 1qq 4. Ct;t1 . p., >. 19t k i?tw. i • 4 i e it - 6 i,a *o- F•.-r, t• -i r t L. ;,c. . n,v7 1 S n fi : � i�t SC r rf 's.. r ;•. t m i . 1 a t. C' it ,�4i il. 1' IM=.€it;;I• .�1-- „•i •4� ,::'' ; '_4t, : 4. •td Eir _, .��-1 ...�'... �, :. ... .31% ? .. t 1 .t M�7 k-. ^•J u '... �'t jr1'. 0, r��l i Reference: Earth Consultants, 1ne. Puget Sound Area Imo.,\Itif i��7 GeoleCltnioni 5snyincera eeoufgisfs 6 envpfmmentol sefeMlsts King County/Map 745 By Thomas Brothers Maps Vicinity Map Dated 2002 13th Place Professional Building Federal Way, Washington NOTE:This plate may contain areas of color,. ECi cannot be responsible for any subsequent Drwn. GLS Date Dec.2001 Prof_No. 9967 misinterpretation of the information resulting from black&white reproductions of this plate. Checked KMW Date i21i8/01 Plate 1 ..�..m r /.ice.. 315 335 346 342 344 346 346 \) 350 352 354 356 / 356 ' Existing Proposed FRetainin'g Wall Keystone Walls , • ZA 3:12 , f X j 1 1 1 T_P-4 t I ._ ,I. ,04 ' III , - II IrP-2 I -M ,III '' . TP711I f}r,, ' ;'i TP:6— - —r. !— : �Ii 4 1- 7 i_' _ ti 11', aan b 11 - : '1 I'' I I- - -- '"' I' ! it �,\ ', tit f l i i I . i.,t t l .3W g , i • �, tIs I I 4 : ;�� - 1 r. _ lit If 1 , . . .1 ;' . I 335 . I . 1 E Li 33d 1 ,\ Paved•Parkin Area I I g. � - I 1 ; I L ± :1P - 7 .32s ..,i1T. LEGEND TP-1 —{—Approximate Location of Approximate Scale ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. = 0 25 50 loott. E-99667, Dec.2001i ((((� ` `s�\\'sr. a 1 ) Subject Site �10, it/1 EarthGeolechnica �Coeera nsi�nEaritSaIldCa Proposed Building Test Pit Location Plan E ; 13th Place Professional Building 1 1 Existing Building Federal Way, Washington NOTE:This plate may contain areas of color. - ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent Drwn. GLS Date Dec.2001 Proj.No. 9967 misinterpretation of the information resulting from black&white reproductions of this plate. Checked KMW Date 12/18/01 Plate 2 0 • V ,�___.. Slope To Drain ,_ :.,;,, r..;:y:J.•.:isr2:rM ✓.---.if-P.:vt;ii. t 15.i't:a a•0 • . ' =t5;:�•llair`dJy 4J v:':;i?r='!,.:�4'fet`, y`)tti..yp s' lt!'oa,,, 'a'.�e"}-:+••.'P'��.',.fn• • °O - .�� " ..�.,. � f {.." .F?'i'-n?4 S ^ir•I;�.ry:y`i•. IJA,.:J••'�::{t?i«° :uf.,1,rit-i.: .''r.' Nr:�l�tygi' 1•�:r'S:' 1� rrd t r.-. j ti,�: o` .° ''J '��x�r�,%.�41"��iS �,�1+�`'�.e S�'�4'`��{s.;::�r':�ifit`;i�;�:h�S.;$:•J:�t4;�• o o. 6 inch min. "`'r-i5• �'r: r Nitl J�r:. t�.a,-,j.<<=,.iiAil r:'Fr"s?:ife!,y il,:•% "":',, o 7 s :�tAs, 3iHJ.,"n ::: 5;e.?Rvy:•',3+ 1;4.4.'.. ,c714vriir, Jirtl s o°.oe .4'�v sg11 i•. . '.k.':i i:ty';:i"i..c.�! .04..!7 t,:�r R Li+k%'. :i 1 :rli•ni+liNai•e0 0 0 j' .;io�;u:yi..�`rr,•,,,t J.,4"Li:`-.ii..L.'L;.r`• 1''••44:14::•r 7'tr:SFe••y ,..:'.t• .. . i• • .•° a "... 18 Inch min. • • • '•• •°•' w• •O. ,;• .••.�••.• • • . O • • 4 inch min. ,• a•.•:o .;e-'.: :u"•• ;•:•,•••••:o.;.. .° ° °- Perforated Pipe '°.••.•%?,.. °-:. ..: -°' D Wrapped in Drainage ••..., ='.. O•p o •. ' o°° °°° o Fabric :: �. ° •.°`_°- 'e - ° e- ' 2 inch min. 2 Inch min, /4 inch max. _ 12 inch —+- min. SCHEMATIC ONLY-NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING LEGEND •,...s. .,�;��:• Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. Pgr1. :.7 Fine aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete; Section 9-03.1(2) of the •-•: r°• WSDOT Specifications. 0 Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or ��✓✓ slots facing down;tight jointed;with a positive gradient.Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines, Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric or equivalent. mum., , • d ' i\, 44i, TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL qii/i.t't/yt1��) Earth CoCI,�Ulfal nc. 13th Place Professional Building 11 1/\ ° """K Federal Way, Washington Pro].No. 9967 I Drwn, GLS `Date Dec,2001 Checked 104W /Date 12/18/01 I Plate 3 Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas Roadway Areas {1 ► r . I A. 3lv;!�,L'S:Z:b34,42Z tiraayy?ya.'4�:?..b.i y4:',.;.�:�� :n.:.),,,_ "`�y.= A 41Wti '`•�:610.1Liw� 7�i '+.h!,7,Y4,'st?'i.1:Pc: rA.4�:-,;:r •..11t-w" ,4. l;i x 0 0° °.• 0 Varies i.5 0 o O tgiltt•,;04�,,I.l�B5�V..4 *.4; {,v uri!,04?xv •tiff. C1''t::�?. , ri::+, i;'S•ua. � ,s„p,�:.j;;�.,.,y;,y:�i:� nl';'°.r. il""w n.�. `riiirr p,,04t•T y w f F �11Y:'�f' 7,,..,, ?n. 1 Foot Minimum ;:u.„.,i i 1f1i1egs::tl..9 :.V:t?•;:i x- a '"�tfr i:? 1*� i fir- , '' �•+n;'i �ti 1J+2rwv '^``•nt.^;.: s 4r'•�4M;,y t—riry rFke:,a.l1 n„'c t : 1 . 1 �+.....:;i,.'4 L. a rF`•''F 4'si 4:�rtgf..�. •.}��,^ rt"'.;:.'.S4 n.5lr.: n4r;•!9 t" tY 11K ?�.d i rtt •,.::•.iUF{:P =d{.195$ . �✓',':;.'M'.' 4:,,v,: �'n ?'•'.t'i' `,-.:N:4N ti i+,r.'}=s • Varies sgi'x-_,,.:.. r!el,,I1','ilsov.o-gite41 a. .k0s f:•:,:..:it r:ey ti:�»u>`}ay,$'¢T iiiT.��i4- r },1,.��ii+��.1#`kill i1u.^.Y.�l'!%"7=.}`.e`�•tJ ,-- t., `.; PIPE `�`�` '8;'tfli 0r OP .4 a yo a0:0, 0; ° A 4•en1�0• .4• I •.°.0, Q Bedding !:51r.;'o�e°'d;;jjo;. ...;..a,hdp":e D;,;• Varies o. uo:ai ooa.' .`�Qct;k0:,•oo:L LEGEND: 3z'L.' t Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab ,o.o 000r •^o,:..a Base Material or Base Rock 00;-;,, -::;,:• Backfill; Compacted On-Site Soil or Imported Select Fill :�.K , :: ;,,,,i41..5n;,. Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. 95 Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-91 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. ,a•� a,o•�� Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and j4 aZ?a ;p4 Laying Conditions. Bedding Should Conform to the Manufacturers Recommendations for the Type of Pipe Selected. iii0. 0 dri\ TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL g011(�i-v 1) Earth Consultants InC. 13th Place Professional Building 1 c�tt�+ c� g��nnt �s�+Mn Federal Way, Washington Prof.No. 9967 jDrwn. GLS 1Date Dec,2001 Checked KMW I Date 12/18/01 i Plate 4 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-9967 Our field exploration was performed on December 14, 2001. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating six test pits to a maximum depth of seven feet below the existing grade. The test pits were excavated by Northwest Excavating subcontracted to ECI, using a rubber-tired backhoe. Approximate test pit locations were determined by pacing from site features. Approximate test pit elevations were determined by locating on the site plan provided by Lance Mueller and Associates. The locations and elevations of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by a engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. Samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Test Pit Logs are presented on Plates A2 through A7. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. The consistency of the soil shown on the logs was estimated based on the effort required to excavate the soil, the stability of the trench walls, and other factors. Earth Consultants,Ina. MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER SYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION •' L?Q c GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand And Clean Clean Gravels ,Gra 0 •0 •0 • gw Mixtures,Little Or No Fines Gravelly (little or no fines) M•r Coarse Soils GP Poorly Graded Gravels,Gravel- + . • Grained + • gp Sand Mixtures,Little Or No Fine Soils More Than GM i� Silty Gravels,Gravel-Send- 60%Coarse Gravels With i �� I 11 / gm Slit Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable ll ----— Retained On amount of lines 1 r # * GC Clayey Gravels.Gravel-Send- No 4 Sieve , y 41 gc Clay Mixtureo '0 .0 a SW Well-Graded Sande. Gravbiiy AndSand Clean Sand r 0 0 0 SW Sande,Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no fines)tt.. 4� More Then Soils ..spans,i'i 1 Co Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly 60% Material £;�,;�� 0. Sp Sands,Little Or No Fines Larger Than Moro Than F No.200 Sieve 50% Coarse 'VON O SM Silly Sands. Sand-Sill Mixtures Size Fraction Sande With FFF �1dd [ SM Fines(appreciable "h� Passing No 4 amount of lines) <45. � $C `— Sieve �q` -� . SC Clayey Sends,Sand-Clay Mixtures l I ML inorganic Slits 5 Vary Flne Sands,Rock F(m-r,Siny- I ml 0iayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts w!Slight Plasticity. Fine Slits Liquid Limit CL /— Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity. Gr ai ed d Less Than 50 ��! CI Gravelly Cleyd,Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Clays III ill i OL Organic Silts And Organic Ot Silly Clays Of Low Plasticity • MH -' Inorganic Sine.Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fire Moro Than mh Sand Or Silty Soils 60% Material Slits I 1 Liquid Limit inorganic Clays Of High Smaller Then And CH No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays Size �� OH Organic Clays Of Medium lb High r f. oh Plasticity, Organic Slits Highly Organic Soils ��Di �ii PT Peat. Humus, Swamp Soils ilk,t,, st r, t t pt With High Organic Contents • Topsoil ' y 4,4, Humus And Duff Layer Fill •�•••�•*•••• Hlyhly Variable Constituents • The discussion In the text of this report Is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. DUAL SYMBOLS are used to Indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,1st I 2"O.D SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE,%dry weight 11 24"I.D.RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED • SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT,% SZ DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION t SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE j['P' �� 4(" LEGEND (V, � ��■I Eari-h Consultants lnc.ir� ,1, (Ufwsl1,*alIe,gI.,.ue C5x/lugaaaI5,vl,I11110a:deauniveProf. No.9967 I Date Dec.'01 I Plate Al Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9967 KMW 12/14/01 TP-1 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: NW Excavating 335' Notes: — Surface Conditions: General W — Ire " 813 Notes (%) 8 o SM Brown silty SAND with gravel,dense,moist ) 10.9 ; 2 — 3 -26%fines 4 -very dense and gray 5 — ,4 t 6 Test pit terminated at 6.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. w ,i41‘,. Test Pit Log ii it /10111 Earth Consultants inc. 13th Place Professional Building vArb, viw c.:xecontolovinf.suceotogoiskowimonwmrtimomitapt Federal Way,Washington Proj.No. 9967 Own. GLS Date Dec.2001 Checked KMW Date 12J19/01 Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and I.Vgmtintsnlhey are not noe?Ins„!ily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responslhilly for the use or interpretation by others of Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 1 Job No, Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9967 KMW 12114/01 TP-2 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: NW Excavating 340' Notes: R. — Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 41' la General W E. 'E. • 15. 0 ". Notes (%) cs ul 0 g ma- 44-.— SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist(Fill) • ••• •• •-•-•• 1 _ ••• • .44 2 !‘1 • , SM Reddish brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist 10.8 3 "-—— •. ; 4 ,.,• .,. -. .:.! :". r"-- 5 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,dense to very dense,moist :. -',.j 6 — 1..............._ 7 1 Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater - encountered during excavation. i EA — Test Pit Log ill Al. § q0;,(114/111)) F C"Ned'ainledrth Consultants Inc.rn023,1$8•Gen1/4,81Sts&Thavironmenm1SCIMILit9 i 13th Place Professional Building Federal Way,Washington k 0_ Proj.No. 9967 Dim GIS Dale Dec.2001 Chedced KMW Date 12/19/01 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and jurrigment. Ibey.trjot necessarily representative of other three and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit Na: 9967 KMW 12/14/01 TP-3 Brandon Contac;lor: Ground Surface Elevation: NW Excavatini 344' Notes: 1; — Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 4" General W . 2 Notes E E (%) 0 D SM Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist 2 • • •. 3 — 11 0 4 • SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,dense to very dense,moist 5 8 Test pit terminated at 6.0 feet below existing grade,No groundwater encountered during mavation. 0 Test Pit Log mei Fartil Consultants Inc. 13th Place Professional Building (/ Ivy\ U1Gtuir,..fintuiRnorwmcgobge.a&Britroratta Sciestf Federal Way,Washington 0 Prot No. 9967 FTwn. GLS bat1 Dec.D 2001 Checked KMW Date 12/19/01 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this coploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis end ILsilgrrtenrid. They are rAtot nihi.Inn representative of other times and locations We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9967 KMW 12/14/01 TP-4 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: NW Elcavating 342' Notes: General W 0 2 Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 4" Notes (%} SM Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist • „ -19%fines 11 3 ,;3 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,dense to very dense,moist • • if 41' 4 Test pit terminated at 4.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. I ., #4. ,40,, Test Pit Log gii41(11ii Earth Consultants Inc. 13th Place Professional Building ?, \vie WO/ Ntlif/ orAlerisnical rolOnells.odoklistsaPswironmennusctennsis Federal Way,Washington 1.0 Prot No. 9967 Dem. GLS Date Dec.2001 Checked KMW Date 12/19/01 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and 1.r!rrigmtritiLThey are.r)ict ngzezt„n.ly representative of other limes and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 1 Job No. Lagged Dale: Test Pit No.: 9967 KMW 12/14/01 TP-5 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: NW Excavating 336' Notes: — Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 4" 9 3 0 General W n 0 Notes (%) SM Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist 140 • 2 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,very dense,moist 3 4 Test pit terminated at 4.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. a a. q (h k 'O W 1 • -i, {, livtiol Earth Consultants inc. 13th PlaceTest Pit Log Professional Building g (tuff °paw:Waco!anglarara-Gankallsla&FnvlianmearalSclanaas Federal Way,Washington Proj.No. 9967 Dan. GLS TDate Dec.2001 Checked KMW —1 Date 12/19/01 —1 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and lurogngme..141 7.11,ey am g,nlatert niecessarily hts 101,1 representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 13th Place Professional Building 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Dale: Test Pit No.: 9967 KMW 12/14/01 TP-6 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: NW Beavating 334' Notes: Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil 4" General W I 1 it 1 08 i Notes (%) g x- 8 a . es ••• t......... _____ SM Brown silty SAND with gravel,loose to medium dense,moist(Fill) •-•407.4 I.- al 1.,•,45, , •r7. i — 5 7 •..••i 0•••• *•• — ••• ••• ••• 2 ••• ••• ____„,, ••• •-•-• 4.•• +s 4,•4,+4,, 3 — ••• SM Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist . . 5 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel,very dense,moist • • , 6 —:, 7 Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. .5- ,4 2 - 0. . il,. .144\ Test Pit Log (Iiim 1 i /401111 Forth Consultants Inc. ( 13th Place Professional Building IIw 0/ \i f if mi ill GeOtechnleul nngtnroet.CAtobtast$Pa P.nvIronmemltielcsulm Federal Way,Washington k ,.k Proj.No. 9967 Own. GLS Date Dec.2001 Checked KMW Date 12/19/C7 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the lime end location of this exploratory hole,modified by erigheering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representakve of other times and locations We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of rnfeinntaitnn nnalsonleirt nn Okla inn APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-9967 Earth Consultants,Inc. PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHT -to. ' 1 1 p0 o r N 4+) 0 0 0 n 0 o „0 - W0-- - -,—+---.--too' _I -t 1 1 co zoo' 1 , '- ' -1— , Z00' 0 �� } 2c o+ M : ....1 'COO' --'— - , / E00' - S 0 .-1 <2} - 000' 2 o ,-1 < 900' I _ 900• LuCC u 900` - i ' ' 800" 2 o QC o Z0'-, 1 ' - _ , , , Z0, 0 >. £0 , , i J_i i . , . . . 1 ` 60. = b0" _ 60' 90' 90 On1 80• �. ri .--1°C / cm o > P• OOL W m a14 4 U u u gii009 g en • co • 0£ I 1 `� Qf _9'Z 13 y win9L 1 •' - L y ul E H M U. Q,- U) U) CO / z °C' W g R a -CO W 8--^` t • �1 1 ¢ o 0 a2 / -£ 8 pa PI �/ -v Z z v u __ Q_ y�) r' -e 111 8 m t) Ww grE ai -OE Z n cn rn � ail. n vs". In _> r� z y • �/ a -oa 4 a,e `v q I, , , - Ill 2 y (9 0 4L ,� -0£ ¢ `o a ?Oa 0 - -10t' Q aZ .-a a Z _ , . - ca 1.� ppf�� `09 H H O `p£ , , , - . :08 — Ca le e CO at I 00Z 0O Q ZLg F.,) 8 n a M �N o �00£ ..� PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT iirTil 44\ i GRAIN SIZE ANALYSES 1 l ^.y ,1 Earth Consultants Inc. 1.3th Place Professional Building G/ f/ 1 . ;a'°'°114mi ego,;evs Coologlp!!!FrivIroornenial ScicrilLsIs Federal Way, Washington Prof. No. 9967 I Drwn, GLS Date Dec.'01 Checked KMW I Date 12/18/01 I Plate B1 STREAM ASSESSMENT Grette AssociatesLLC -11kirENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • Prepared by: Grette Associatesu-c October 24,2007 Prepared for: Tom Pierson File No.: 883.001 c/o Jon Graves Architects&Planners PLLC 3110 Ruston Way, Ste. D Tacoma, WA 98402 Re: 33430 13th Place - Site Assessment Grette Associates has contracted with Tom Pierson to conduct a stream assessment on a 1.1 acre property located at 33430 13th Place within the City of Federal Way, Washington (Subject Property). The Subject Property is recorded as King County Tax Parcel 7681900010. A stream assessment was requested in a July 20, 2007 letter from Janet Shull, AICP on behalf of the City of Federal Way. According to the letter an existing stream is present within the adjacent parcel to the east of the Subject Property. A City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map (Figure 1) was reviewed prior to the site assessment. According to this map no stream is present on or adjacent to the Subject Property. Figure 1. City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map ,�� 0 - s 4. _SUBJECT q PROPPR;Y --T -----"E-1 Eit S 336th ,St1:1 j '- --- +�. WENATCHEE TACOMA 509.663-63Q0 253.573.9300 Fax 509-664-1982 Fax 253-573.9321 151 S.WORTHEN ST.STE.101• WENATCHEE,WA 98801 2111 NORTH 30TH STREET• TACOMA,WA 98403 The Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Forest Practices database was consulted to determine if water bodies occur on or in the vicinity of the Subject Property that are previously mapped and classified under the water typing system detailed in WAC 222-16-030 and -031. According to the Water Type Map (Figure 2) no such water bodies are present on or near the Subject Property, Figure 2. WDNR Water Type Map 17'2940 712942 t 712944\\ Iwo ----111111111111 :._ Site Wall Vic' ity = ' 1712920 1712922 c 1712924 F Ways rhaeuse ripe m A site assessment was conducted on October 23, 2007 by Grette Associates staff biologist Mike Layes. The entire Subject Property was assessed for streams, wetlands, and other critical areas. None of these areas were observed within the Subject Property during the assessment. A stream was observed off-site within the eastern portion of the adjacent parcel to the east(King County Tax Parcel 7681900020). The stream flows south along the eastern boundary of this parcel and enters a large storm drain within the south eastern corner of the property(Photo 1 and 2). The stream is conveyed underground to an outfall on the south side of South 336 Street,just west of the intersection of 13th Place (Figure 3). This stream is a tributary of Hylebos creek, a fish bearing stream and therefore meets the definition of a City of Federal Way Major Stream. Major Streams require a 100-foot buffer under FWCC 22-1306. However, buffers are only applicable to above ground portions of the stream measured perpendicular to the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). As the stream exists on private property, the OHWM was not flagged in the field. The approximate stream location and 100-foot buffer are sketched over an aerial photograph in Figure 3 below. The 100-foot stream buffer does not appear to extend onto the Subject Property. WENATCHEE TACOMA 509-663-6300 253-573-9300 Fax 509 664 1882 ax 25 573-9321 15I S.WORTHEN ST.STE.101 • WENATCHEE,WA 98801 211 1 NORTH 38Tu_,-,STR ET lei OM WA 98103 Figure 3. Aerial Photograph with approximate stream location and buffer I' 1 ,, i ., 4. � trriilll Zi s 4'. ' Subject t'rupert}° \\I - , :: Nl s i; R ')1Urt11 Dra111 appruapl.lte p 1 « G l coo rl it lkul. `"' as., �l +! m w � tic ! � *' 3 ��= p° # ..' . , f , t w m { ()titf,l A . , �. °.., R} 5tt'�ctm ;I` 1 �� 00 1 1su N^hevihs 2007 S:arrbovi ',f7 (,QC) kk _ 2007 Tale Atl.,•: I ' i 100:�ti . i �r l9 +l 331 t' 57 I, 122'1 'Pointer 4: 1Er) €yu .111 14left it -.�� t'5 x- ' �,. _e j�,� i � s �i: - r .. a..:f r a. a . ` fir` �.. jG �.� Photo 1. Stream, looking north Photo 2. Stream entering storm drain, looking south WENATCHEE TACOMA 509 663 6300 253.573-9300 Fax 509-664-1882 Fax 253-573.9321 151 S.WORTHEN ST.STE.101• WENATCHEE,WA 98801 2111 NORTH 30TH STREET• TACOMA,WA 98403 The site assessment was conducted using the best available scientific information and methodologies and the best professional judgment of Grette Associates staff biologists. Final acceptance and approval of the stream assessment is at the discretion of City of Federal Way staff. If you have any questions regarding this review please contact me at(253) 573-9300. Sincerely, GRETTE ASSOCIATES, LLC Mike Layes Biologist W E NATCH EE TACOMA 509-663-6300 253-573-9300 Fax 509-664-1882 Fax 253-573-9321 151 S.WORTHEN ST.STE.101• WENATCHEE,WA 98801 2111 NORTH 30TH STREET• TACOMA,WA 98403 SECTION VII OTHER PERMITS SECTION VII OTHER PERMITS The project will require a side sewer permit, and a water service connection permit from the Lakehaven Utility District, SECTION VIII EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN SECTION VIII EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Prior to clearing or grading areas that are to remain undisturbed during project construction shall be delineated. The existing site has been previously paved; therefore no topsoil stripping will occur. Existing storm inlets shall be protected with filter fabric sediment traps. The perimeter will be protected with silt fence and tree protection fence (NGPE). A 100'x 20' construction exit will be installed at the existing curb cut onto 13th Place. Catch Basin sediment traps will be installed at new storm structures. Disturbed areas will be stabilized with temporary seed and mulch. No sediment pond or trap is provided. The existing site consists of pavement and is only 1.0 acre in size.. There are not high erosion areas, ESC recommendations in special reports, or proposed exception or medications for this site. SECTION IX BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES AND DECLARATIONS OF COVENANT ilkCITY OF Federal Way PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET Project Name: Cedars Redesign Date:6/13/2008 Project No: By:ESM Site Address: 33430 13th Place South Fil/in those items which pertain to this project and return to the Public Works Department •u• IC •oa•way •rlva e •n- i e Improvements Improvements Item Unit Unit Price Quantity Price Quantity Price ROAD CONSTRUCTION Clearing&Grubbing LS Bid Estimate 0 $ - 0 $ - SawcuttIng LF 1.30 220 $ 286.00 30 $ 39.00 Excavation&Embankment CY 18 00 0 $ - 5918 $ 106,524.00 AC Pavement TN 40 00 0 $ - 1290 $ 51,600.00 CSTC TN 16 00 0 $ - 870 $ 13,920.00 Cement Concrete Curb/Gutter LF 10 00 216 $ 2,160.00 1370 $ 13,700.00 Extruded Asphalt Curb LF 4 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Concrete Sidewalk LF 22 0D 24 $ 528.00 3431 $ 75,482.00 Concrete driveway approach SY 35 00 0 $ - 51 $ 1,785.00 Monument in case EA 155 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Adjust ex.monument to grade EA 330 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Adjust ex cb to grade EA 400 00 0 $ - 0 $ - DRAINAGE PIPE 6"Pipe LF 1100 0 $ - 0 $ - 8"Pipe LF 25 00 0 $ - 0 $ - 12"Pipe LF 40.00 0 $ - 233 $ 9,320.00 18"Pipe IF 40 0D 0 $ - 0 $ - 24"Pipe LF 53 00 0 $ - 0 $ - 36"Pipe LF 92 00 0 $ - 0 $ - 48"Pipe IF 85 00 0 $ - 0 $ - 54"Pipe IF 106 00 0 $ - 0 $ - _ 60"Pipe IF 130 00 0 $ - 0 $ - 72"Pipe LF 214 OD 0 $ - 0 $ - CATCH BASINS Inlet&Grate EA 475 00 0 $ - 0 $ - CB Type I&Grate EA 900 00 0 $ - 4 $ 3,600.00 CB Type 1148"&Grate EA 1,900.00 0 $ - 0 $ - CB Type 1154"Type EA 2,000 00 0 $ - 0 $ - CB Type II 60"&Grate EA 3,200 00 0 $ - 0 $ - CB Type 1172"&Grate EA 5,000 00 0 $ - 0 $ - CB Type 1184"&Grate EA 9,100 00 0 $ - _ 0 $ - CB Type 11 96"&Grate EA Bid Estimate 0 $ - 0 $ Round solid locking lid EA 360 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Adandon exiting cb EA 325 00 0 $ - 3 $ 975.00 RETENTION/DETENTION CONTROL Pond Excavation&Spillway CY 7.00 0 $ - 0 $ - Restrictor/Separator EA 75000 0 $ • 0 $ - Vault EA Bid Estimate 0 $ - 0 $ - Gravel Access Road LF 15 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Rip Rap Outlet!Protection CY 17.00 0 $ - 0 $ - Bollards EA 50000 0 $ - 0 $ - Fencing(around pond) LF 1200 0 $ - 0 $ - Infiltration Trench w/12"Perf LF 18.00 0 $ - 0 $ Flow Spreader LF 20.00 0 $ - 0 $ - Trash Racks EA 200 00 0 $ - 0 $ - WATER QUALITY 8ioswale EA Bid Estimate 0 5 - 0 $ - Wetvault EA Bid Estimate 0 $ - 0 $ - Stormfilter Vault EA Bid Estimate 0 $ - 1 $ 27,000.00 Stormwater wetland EA Bid Estimate 0 $ - 0 $ - Sand Filter EA Bid Estimate 0 $ - 0 $ - Catch basin Inserts EA 800 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Oil/Water Separator EA Bid Estimate 0 $ - 0 $ • High Flow Bypass EA Bid Estimate 0 $ - 0 $ - RETAINING WALLS&STRUCTURES Retaining Walls SF 23 00 0 $ - 929 $ 21,367.00 Bridges LS Bid Estimate 0 5 0 $ TRAFFIC&LIGHTING Signalization LS Bid Estimate 0 $ - Cl $ - Channelization LS Bid Estimate 0 $ - 0 $ - Signs EA 100.00 0 $ - 3 $ 300.00 Streetlights(City Center) EA 5,000 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Streetlights(Standard) EA 3,00000 2 $ 6,000.00 6 $ 18,000,00 RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING Street Trees EA 250 D0 0 $ - 0 $ - Sod SF 100 0 $ - 0 $ - Shrubs(City Center) EA 6 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Tree Grates(City Center) EA 700 00 0 $ - 0 $ - SITE STABILIZATION/EROSION CONTROL Quarry Spells TN 75 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Seeding/Mulch Acre 3,000 00 0 $ - 0.16 $ 480.00 Silt Fence LF 4,00 0 $ - 410 $ 1,640.00 Netting Jute Mesh SY 13 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Sediment Pond Standpipe EA 200.00 0 $ - 0 $ - Sensitive Area Fencing LF 3 00 0 $ - 0 $ - Catch basin inserts EA 7000 0 $ - 8 $ 560.00 Subtotal $ 8,974.00 Subtotal $ 346,292.00 1--`--- -2--- — (253)838-6113 Signature Telephone Number ESM Consulting Engineers,LLC Firm Name THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WILL BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT: Public Roadway Improvements: Private On-Site Improvements: Erosion/Sedimentation Control: Subtotal CONTINGENCY(20%) TOTAL BOND AMOUNT After recording return to: City of Federal Way PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 STR: Permit No: Parcel No: DECLARATION OF COVENANT IN CONSIDERATION OF the approved City of Federal Way(City)building permit for application No. relating to real property legally described as(insert description) Cedars Redesign see attached Parking and Storm Drainage Plan, Sheet C-6,By ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC,dated October 5,2007. The undersigned as Grantor declares that the above described property is hereby subject to an easement for a natural or constructed conveyance system and hereby dedicates, covenants, and agrees as follows: 1. City shall have the right to ingress and egress over those portions of real property described above to access such easement area for inspection of and to reasonably monitor the system for performance, operational flows or defects in accordance with City's Surface Water Management Divisions procedures. 2. If City determines that maintenance or repair work is required to be done to the system, the Manager of the Surface Water Management Division of the Department of Public Works shall give notice of the specific maintenance and/or repair required. The Manager shall also set a reasonable time in which such work is to be completed by the Grantor, its heirs, successors or assigns. If the above required maintenance and/or repair is not completed within the time set by the Manager, the City may perform the required maintenance and/or repair. Written notice will be sent to the Grantor stating the City's intention to perform such maintenance. Maintenance work will not commence until at least seven (7) days after such notice is mailed. If, within the sole discretion of the Surface Water Management Division Manager, there exists an imminent or present danger, said seven (7) day notice period will be waived and maintenance and/or repair work will begin immediately.. 3. If at any time the City reasonably determines that any existing retention/detention system creates any conditions detrimental to the receiving surface water system, public and/or private property, the Surface Water Management Division Manager may take measures specified therein. 4. The Grantor shall assume all responsibility for the cost of any maintenance and for repairs to the system. Such responsibility shall include reimbursement to the City within thirty(30) days of the receipt of the invoice for any such work performed. Overdue payments will require payment of interest at the current legal rate as liquidated damages. If legal action ensures,the prevailing party is entitled to costs or fees. 5. The Grantor is hereby required to obtain written approval from the Surface Water Management Division Manager of the City of Federal Way Department of Public Works prior to filling, piping, cutting, or removing vegetation (except in routine landscape maintenance) in open vegetated drainage facilities(such as swales,channels,ditches,ponds,etc.),or performing any alterations or modifications to the drainage facilities contained within property as described previously. Any notice or consent required to be given or otherwise provided for by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective upon personal delivery, or three(3)days after mailing by Certified Mail,return receipt requested. b. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties,and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, and all agreements whatsoever whether oral or written. This covenant is intended to protect the value of desirability of the real property described above, and shall insure to the benefit all the citizens of City of Federal Way, and shall be binding on all heirs, successors,and assigns. By: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the .,to be the free and voluntary act ofsuch party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at , Washington My commission expires: K:IUEVREV VORMS\S TORMCOV SECTION X OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL CEDARS REDESIGN Storm Water Facility Maintenance Program The following Best Management Practices (BMP's) used to prevent or reduce pollution to receiving waters are based on information from the King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual(1998)and Federal Way Addendum(1999). 3.5 Catch Basins Cetch basins are underground concrete structures typically provided with a slotted grate to collect stormwater runoff and route it through underground pipes. Catch basins can also be used as a junction in a pipe system and may have a solid lid. There are two catch basin types. A Type 1 catch basin is a rectangular box with approximate dimensions of 3'x2'x5'. Type 1 catch basins are utilized when the connected conveyance pipes are less than 18 inches in diameter and the depth from the gate to the bottom of the pipe is less than 5 feet. Type 2 catch basins, also commonly referred to as storm manholes, are round concrete structures ranging in diameter of 4 feet to 8 feet Type 2 catch basins are used when the connecting conveyance pipe is 18 inches or greater or the depth from grate to pipe bottom exceeds 5 feet,. Type 2 catch basins typically have manhole steps mounted on the side of the structure to allow for access. Both catch basin types typically provide a storage volume (sump) below the outlet pipe to allow sediments and debris to settle out of the stormwater runoff. Some catch basins are also provided with a spill control device (inverted elbow on outlet pipe) intended to contain large quantities of grease or oils. The most common cleaning method for catch basins is to utilize a truck with a tank and vacuum hose (vector truck) to remove sediment and debris from the sump. Catch basins may be an enclosed space where harmful chemicals and vapors can accumulate. Therefore, if the inspection and maintenance requires entering a catch basin, it should be conducted by an individual with training and certification in working in hazardous confined spaces. ^.tee.. • z-42,-'42:04.•4, grate ! coo. - �'��'�0 fix : + -. .v,.. pro= ‘ ?�,, r _— W rem '- / RIRD'S-EYE VIEW s - base section «.Y*'k=3 ••;, ` l .w.a era. L___I Ty p e I SIDE PROFILE Type 2 Federal Way Storm water Maintenance Manual Page 25 Catch Basins Catch Basins Checklist Date Drainage Conditions That Frequency System ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Problem Conditions to Check For Should Exist Feature Warning signs(e.g., "Dump no "Dump No Waste- pollutants"Stencil Stencil or stamp should be Drains to Stream") A General or stamp not visible and easily read shall be painted or visible embossed on or adjacent to all storm drain inlets. Trash or debris which is located immediately In No trash or debris M,S General Trash&Debris front of the catch basin located immediately in opening or is blocking front of catch basin or Inletting capacity of the on grate opening. basin by more than 10%. Trash or debris(in the basin)that exceeds 60 percent of the sump depth as measured from the bottom of basin to M General Trash&Debris invert of the lowest pipe No trash or debris in into or out of the basin,but the catch basin. in no case less than a minimum of six inches clearance from the debris surface to the invert of the lowest pipe. Trash or debris in any inlet and M General Trash&Debris or outlet pipe blocking Inletfree of trash outlet o pipesdebris. more than 1/3 of its height. Dead animals or vegetation that could No dead animals or M General Trash&Debris generate odors that could Vegetation present cause complaints or within the catch basin. dangerous gases(e.g., methane). Sediment(in the basin) that exceeds 60 percent of the sump depth as measured from the bottom of basin to invert of the M General Sediment lowest pipe into or out of No sediment in the the basin,but in no case catch basin less than a minimum of 6 inches clearance from the sediment surface to the invert of the lowest pipe. Top slab has holes larger Structure Damage than 2 square inches or A General to Frame and/or cracks wider than 1/4 inch Top slab is free of Top Slab (Intent is to make sure no holes and cracks. material is running into basin). Federal Way Stormwater Maintenance Manual Page 26 Catch Basins Checklist Catch Basins Checklist (Continued) Date Drainage Conditions That Frequency System ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Problem Conditions to Check For Should Exist Feature Frame not sitting flush on Structure Damage top slab,i.e..,separation of Frame is sitting flush A General to Frame and/or more than 3/4 inch of the on the riser rings or top Top Slab frame from the top slab. slab and firmly Frame not securely attached. attached. Fractures or Maintenance person Basin replaced or A General Cracks in Basin judges that structure is repaired to design Walls/Bottom unsound. standards. Grout fillet has separated or cracked wider than 1/2 Fractures or inch and longer than 1 foot at the joint of any Pipe is re-grouted and A General Cracks in Basin inlet/outlet pipe or any secure at basin wall, Walls/Bottom evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/ if failure of basin has Basin replaced or A General Misalignment created a safety,function, repaired to design or design problem. standards. Vegetation growing across M General Vegetation and blocking more than No vegetation blocking 10%of the basin opening. opening to basin. Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe joints that No vegetation or root M General Vegetation is more than six inches tall and less than six inches growth present. apart. Any evidence of oil, gasoline,contaminants,or other pollutants Contamination and No contaminants or M General Pollution (Coordinate pollutants resent, removal/cleanup with local p water quality response agency). Catch Any open catch basin A Basin Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only requires maintenance. Cover partially in place. Catch basin cover is closed Mechanism cannot be Catch Locking opened by one A Basin Mechanism Not maintenance person with Mechanism opens with Cover Working proper tools. Bolts into proper tools. frame have less than 1/2 Inch of thread. One maintenance person cannot remove lid after Catch Cover Difficult to applying normal lifting Cover can be removed A Basin Remove pressure. (Intent is to by one maintenance Cover keep cover from sealing person. off access to maintenance.) Federal Way Stormwater Maintenance Manual Page 27 Catch Basins Checklist Catch Basins Checklist (Continued) Date Drainage Frequency System 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ Problem Conditions to Check For Conditions That Should Exist Feature Ladder is unsafe due to Ladder meets design Ladder Rungs missing rungs,not standards and allows A Ladder Unsafe securely attached to basin maintenance person wall,misalignment,rust, safe access. cracks,or sharp edges. A Grates Grate opening r Grate with opening wider Grate opening meets Unsafe than 7/8 inch. design standards. Trash and debris that is M,S Grates Trash and Debris blocking more than 20%of Grate free of trash and grate surface inletting debris. capacity. Damaged or Grate missing or broken Grate is in place and A Grates meets design Missing. member(s)of the grate. standards. If you are unsure whether a problem exists, please contact a Professional Engineer. Comments: Key: (M) Monthly from November through April. (A) Once in late summer(preferable September) (S) After any major storm (use 1-inch in 24 hours as a guideline). Federal Way Stompwater Maintenance Manual Page 28 Catch Basins Checklist 3e15 Stormfilter® Cast-In-Place, Precast, Linear Stormfilter and Catch Basin Units This media filter technology has been under development in the Pacific Northwest since the early 1990s. During the early stages of development, leaf compost was used in fixed beds, replacing sand. Continued development of this technology is based on placing the media in filter cartridges (vertical media filters) instead of fixed beds. The filter media can be housed in cartridge filters enclosed in concrete vaults or catch basin like structures. Assortments of filter media types are available from the manufacturer. The system functions by routing the stormwater through the filtering medium, which traps particulates and/or soluble pollutants. Stormfilter® units are a proprietary manufactured system. See manufacturer's publications for additional maintenance information. energy dissipators t ... �i, *f! *....,S. * 1lTi* . * �../ iaer:r iiitita�r�ri .Ya. s�ialit"iBY� outlet= arcteasi•:esnsr en s::Qr ar v, �, ee seire(erw 1. bay ' cartridge bay pretrbatment , jfiVtiitkilA.1_IK,Itifrfi.ti*x*..*AAtiA*( i iiri Nor Vwi�ui'r�ita i G�ila i i. C . r swamis• outlet flowspreader Inlet BIRD'S-EYE VIEW T access lid i diamond plate doors 11s1 yw fe ° 1 1 '�' iln�lp .. lfiaail , : .r l—AI ��' . r= IfiGil P4,<. Y 1 `7•® ladder — alternative inlet pipe perforated drain baffle wall connection to outlet bay I �_ *I 1-..-, 1.,t,. (gl.l �1. 1 1111 l l , f •�� 1 _., �� inlet pipe -- outlet pipe radial flow cartridges 'Steps eps SIDE PROFILE Federal Way Stormwater Maintenance Manual Page 55 Stormfilter`'Cast-In-Place, Precast, Linear Stormfilter and Catch Basin Units Stormfilter©Cast-In-Place, Precast, Linear Stormfilter Units and Catch Basin Units Checklist Date Drainage Conditions That Should Frequency System Problem Conditions to Check For Feature ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Exist No sediment deposits on Sediment Sediment accumulation top of cartridges. Media Sediment on cartridges M filter vault accumulation on top exceeds 0.25 inches on top of likely indicates that of filter cartridges cartridges. cartridges are plugged and require maintenance Sediment accumulation in be Sediment In vault should Media Sediment vault exceeds 2 inches. Look removed Cartridges M filter vault accumulation in vault for other indicators of clogged should be checked and cartridges or overflow replaced or serviced as needed. M Media Trash and floatable Trash and floatable debris No trash or other floatable filter vault debris accumulation accumulation in vault debris in filter vault. Filter vault does not drain Filter media checked and within 24 hours following replaced if needed If Media Filter cartridges storm. Look for evidence of cartridges are plugged S with oil additional filter vault submerged submergence due to backwater or excessive treatment or source hydrocarbon loading control BMP may be needed. Sediment Sediment accumulation Sediment accumulation M Forebay accumulation exceeds 6 inches or 1/3 of less than 6 inches available sump. Trash and/or floatable debris should be removed during monthly M Forebay Trash and floatable Trash and/or floatable debris inspections. Significant oil debris accumulation accumulation accumulation may indicate the need for additional treatment or source control. One maintenance person Below Access cover cannot remove lid after Cover repaired to proper A ground Damaged/Not applying 80 pounds of lift, working specifications or vault working corrosion of deformation of replaced. cover. Below Any part of the pipes are A ground Damaged Pipes crushed or damaged due to Pipe repaired or replaced vault corrosion and/or settlement. Cracks wider than'h Inch or evidence of soil particles Vault structure has Vault repaired or replaced Below entering the structure through cracks in wall,bottom, roug so that vaults meets A groundthe cracks,or vault and damage to frame maintenance/Inspection design specifications and and/or top slab Is structurally sound. personnel determine that the vault is not structurally sound. Below Vault structure has Cracks wider than 0.5 inch at Vault repaired so that no A ground cracks in wall,bottom, the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe cracks exist wider than vault and damage to frame or evidence of soil particles 0 25 inch at the joint of and/or top slab. entering through the cracks inlet/outlet pipe. Federal Way Storm water Maintenance Manual Page 56 Stormfilter"'Cast-In-Place, Precast, Linear Stormfilter and Catch Basin Units Checklist Stormfilter® Cast-In-Place, Precast, Linear Stormfilter Units and Catch Basin Units Checklist (Continued) Dale Drainage Conditions That Should Frequency System Problem Conditions to Check For Feature ✓ ✓ ✓ V Exist Baffles corroding,cracking, Below warping,and/or showing signs Baffles repaired or A ground Baffles of failure as determined by replaced to design vault maintenance/inspection specifications. person. Maintenance person judges Below that ladder is unsafe due to Ladder meets design A ground Ladder rungs unsafe missing rungs,misalignment, standards and allows vault rust,or cracks. Ladder must maintenance persons safe be fixed or secured access. immediately. If you are unsure whether a problem exists, please contact a Professional Engineer. Comments: Key: (M) Monthly from November through April. (A) Once in late summer(preferable September) (S) After any major storm(use 1-inch in 24 hours as a guideline). Federal Way Storm water Maintenance Manual Page 57 Stormfilter"Cast-In-Place, Precast, Linear Stormfilter and Catch Basin Units Checklist APPENDIX ENGINEERS JOB NO. 0 PLANNERS ` �''{� - �^ 'jam SHEETS/ ` OF PROJECT 4 i"' .��P P 1S4 ^Sectmo husiutsr AYE �� /V O V/ 7l SUBJECT_ STbiz,M DgA IitiJA�rt. C•Rv-C.0 L.# T,oN DESIGNED 'ZS-A& CHECKED PS A. • w ' ; I i._i 11 1 I I I I I I 1 I ! I I I I 5 E '1,(Nc , i ! 1 I ,r��,��°'c� �VEYL7= 1z b2a5' p ! jo($' � —J_ IH • . ,,`',% ,,,c, . '5's'. I I -I F. 1 ' ' i I t i .f...,� - _� s p./-d ,'.�c.._. .r 11 :r�s�.s.__.p a.�c3. mer_ c : :I i ✓' ' -~ % // t," _ Cil iaMeei 147& km 4'oas/r�4f � �� :� _ ; � _,5��..Q.N4.�,-.SUSJ1it.�s.5._..PA.Ct‹.ri I I I ! \\....„......... I � '• I I —I 1 ! I �I I T i ,.i.� / k ' q-A� I I o i I --1 v _e G'� S r P " l' - 7 _ii I 1 I i 1 f-'h._l `o rJ '-ice-7 ey I e, I S e c 0 Lv 47. _. ;;..41A44.! ' i ; Spee�� :�4; � 1_y`_;,�5 .a fatc-f- 3� _2 �_01- __! ` .33._6 '`h I ,s; ree7(._. eie 8._Q� ref 1.v_es4' 1 1' _.._ Vie'- -e1r1 r /7-e I c - '¢c%�ic 1 ' ..4u- -4 �'.' : i 1 ! I -1 1 ' : ' _ i 1 1. 1 ' 1 1 ' 1 ! i i ' 1 1 1 ` ! 1 i 1 i _i F I ' i— 1 1 i i I ■■■■■ • 1 ir5 ,AA ' i7E I I I $1J1J1fl 11 • . I FiEfill 1 S 0I 'P1 -j' 5' J9� � . ■■■ mpi - a , ' t' • ',opl } • I I i r b . I t , I e' O E • i I7� ' �. I h sa 4 o , I i_ -' ei I i - ' I- . ' , 4 rlr In UMW c 14 __4r_!• I -J4.0 a .L�.�s. :` ; ,t . o .s_;__„s�rl a w ,:�- i -.__.-�r c-�Qs, f z �� ie, 1 ' — ._7r _ 1 `i 1 / 1 .yc ees_r^vs _ r'ces�'eep Alfo k i . 1 I i i� Q 4 id 0144 a :,..,r __: 3 IQ-u . u - So . .I 1 I I 1 :, = . MIME I NM A. ..-�- 'r % .* ; ; A'R MN ._teak4! 4" ' i I I I a(17' 19 _; 1 I iVI - a. g - ' btk� err, ! ' p i_a 0 Al — _T-i H f' '4MARIO 1 e 1 S ,.12i2.. .7..� A1 i- ..GZ.� 'Q':..t1 _! _ _1 '17 J/k • . d .1 <, 5- 1. p,(.. - /..r_tL4. f L. . 1 �, �0.-/o c .e/--i � ! f' ` _1--�— I _1 .-I 1 ' ____I •I - Lv ! I ! i I i , + 0 J ENGINEERS JOBNO./'368 "'D0/-7q1. - � E 0 PLANNERS SHEET 2 '7-� ! OF PROJECT The G 17�PYDYiS e DATE , A/4 V . 7 9 SUBJECT_A/dr[YLi/1G, CG(/CYIa7k J/¢Ns"DESIGNED ie C/- CHECKED >`'s4 I I I ! I I i I I _! 1 I I I I I I ' ! 11 I , ?. ! ' II I-I I I i I I ! i I 1 . 1 _ Y _.. Th -, I ;_,4 r_e.a 171 T ld c 1-k_S I ! fj a' ' , 1 0.; ---- FIII AA/if/ 44.61_a_s_edili 1 _ Il II IIII 1 I I 1 � c- I I I I � !_I I I 1 i t I 1. )..>4,x_._e c 6 1,6icj fp�u I-- V 5tZ ) I i ! I' i i ; I I I I I I _ r1 - V , G ! i I I � � .I 7-7-7 . I .i z1 14 d ' �� fl' I I I 1 I I ib —� 1 I I . 1 1 f . 1 I (_._ .. , !,� i . 11I I 1 ' ! 0 T I I I i y I --I I r � I I J, I 1 I I � 1 m . • , ,_2. .e9m 40,-4 __9,-zis____4/e.'re)e 1/4,.- . - ' ' ■ lr� _ _ I 1 I I I 1 11 1 1 _ ' 1 111 + 1 I , I I I I ! 1 I I i , . I I I I I I I I ' I II I III ' 1 I I ' I _____ , I _ i 1.,. I . ! I _Li I I I ! I ! -I- ! '_l_ I II _1 _1 1 i ! f I I I 1 t ___� I _ -1 - I I I _-� - -_=_-_�__ _ -_ . _ i I� ! T 1 f I �I 1-1-1- i I I i �� 0 ENGINEERS JOU N01736S ril'79'� - ` PLANNERS f O SHEET •OF PROJECT e Zti71€/-- it:›Y IS C i DATE_fr v ` / SUBJECT - I G da/g a h¢ / 04/-cDESIGNED fie g CHECKED P-SA I I ' li II 1 ! III III II II ! i ' I__ l I !I1 I I 1 { i I IIIII I ' 1 I _ ; Ili ! I l I I I I . I 4 rA4• llh- i I ��e I I . I=! fi 1 ilir 1 1 ; I I I Hi 1 . . rk!'_ 1 1 , � I T7 ED ll m! wI1 * �i1 i I ► I 4_I I i i l 1 , . , 1 �'' - d ► '71 Mill I ■ I I -6°.--i TI ' 1" i I ; - '--- 1 ! I ` I. J_ p.mes. II I I I El ill annul - miumit. ' ! I I � i I q _ 6 - I� T, a ' ;- 7-, 1 ? 1 I ! I .' I 1 I =ma . 1 II0M■nIIIINId ' i% --■ A= .- I Qom. ea ' r �a� 1 I - I Ipill', I I 1111111111011_ _ I uu T inn ■m= i ■ 1 1 _f I_j �Kr_fie)-I I, i =. ! i ' fi . 1 _ - . NM ' ! I II • • _ I` 0 1 ENGINEERS os NO.I-3C8 / / I 10 PLANNERS SHEET 4- OF PROJECT Ille� ` ___t DATE} NO v 7 SUBJECT 4 -el!1//G . a/co !QTir4 DESIGNED !C ./4HECKED ��I I I ! I 11 I I II I� 1 1 II ' 1 Il I I J I I , ! 11 !J.4. it III � II ! . �-` ' i .' z? ! % i .4 i _ , ! I i ! !J2111, t l i i i I ! I I { 1 I I ' qEi__.. t I ! 0. hiiq _ Imo'_iLI I I ! 1 I I i I : 1 1 1 1 ! r ' ' i Ii l 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 a-r si i _;/; / 1}'c . 1 1 _ 1 1 1 �� It "{ _ .. 5.51 I dr. �1 i 1 s u t'e! '� '�J...1� l�s' !tea_y_i i _' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i � .'ir1 l i i 1 I _I 1 1 ,z 74ed qeJ I '4f'.r -4.__ Imo- 1 I •1 1 I ': 11i7 Ili , i1 I _ td_to g-,. i , . .,_ e , ; A_ . . RIM • 1 I I , . � I r I 1 , J ■ I MIMI 1 _� I I � = 1 i -� 1 !� �im.i�� ■ O= d!1 . 8. �, Qf I I A/ .B� 1 I . -1-- ! , ! 1111WI8n. I I I , i i 1 MN I 11111.1=1 ili ■ l i i H 1 _ . pI F__, I I - I i 1 1 I . I I 1 I __I__ I 1 I III 1 I 1 ! I i I II III I I i I I _ I i I _1 I i I 1 I I II ! �. I . II II111 I i 111 I 1 J I I I I I I I ! I I I I I 1 11 III i E.._. III i_I i_ + 1 i I I I ! II I 1 I1 ' 1 1_-i i I i ! ' i I I ; ` `_ I i I_...i I Fr-1 7 I ,� 1�-1 t Fi , "I-; i : �_ ;_f i I — - 1- 7 £J 1.:. .L.J J..:J .L..u) 1.6J E'..1 Jrd Iowa +.I.a a.... .,.... �.4. 50'1 ••2 .3 .4 .5 1 2 , 3 4 5 10 50 40 _ - i 40 30 . 30 20 - •20 2 Q` = 10 VR43 . ' A.: 10 cd 8 z ti 6 Rm 5 - =s r • y a 4 `5A 3' wi 4 vs r a 3 �� o Qp 3 w 2 .t 4° v b Y • 2 4 9 49 1 - i .5 t, .5 1 .2 .3 .4 .5 1 2 3 4 5 10 20 VELOCITY IN FEET PER SECOND AVERAGE VELOCITIES FOR ESTIMATING TRAVEL TIME FOR OVERLAND FLOW SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE TECHNICAL RELEASE NO.55 JANUARY 1975 . EM 1110-345-Z84 �-.! 14 A u g 64 -1a -stoop 1 -lave 10uATION: 0.0.34(e/SI•t Tvt - -seep " - -1000 a IS ROU N NIH DNNES3 COEFFICIENT IN AIIG -,01. -1 0 FORMULA APPROPRIATE TO MATERIAL II ,-polo Elands OF CHANNEL -Of -KMEIS RECIPROCAL OF CROSS SLOPE -fp REFERENCEt H.R.0.PROCEEDINGS 1144, -OF PAGE l$0,EQUATION 1111 -7 l •�� • ET.AIIPLE IS EE CUOMO LINES) -ai -/000 t GIVEN; S•0,03 7C Se f•If.3 i/P•130p ••0.017 _Se -oA -7 e + .7•0.70 -SO -'Imp FIND: 0•S 0 CFS_- ..1p • p In nIpoo - _ -ae 1 ( .-SOD rg L'-'......-1- .U. .. ..TOO W C 1 1�I--"�.` .a. V �G ..APn 2 - J „ - ■ 3O W W • 1 z -A, a t _ 7E. -70p Z -97 - W 1NST000TIGNS -ea 4 1.7 -eel O -W0 I- lb CONNECT a/A RATIO WITH SLOPE(S1 -G1 0 -00? AND CONNECT DISCHARGE 101 WITH W 6. -10 DEPTH I)1.Roma TOO LINES MUST -al O' Def U - INTERSECT U LINE FOR O COMPLETE SOLUTION N ' -Of - le0 E FOR SHALLOW V-SNAPEO CHANNEL AS -A pf f -Ol -pp SNO.II USE NOMOGRAPN RITN i•• c - OS G O. -so -a0• O -.Of • 70 -ter.-- i -1' , '+ TO DETERMINE r' F.70 OISCHAIIGE 0 IN T PORTION OF CHANNEL I _ r 00x HA1RN6 won,%: r �// r •.07 OETERNINE DEPTH) 1J (! FOR TOTAL DISCHARGE �-- Ee T ENTIRE SECTION•, , r THEN USE NOMOGRAPH TO DETERMINE OS IN SECTION 1 FOII DEPTH • •• Ip f TO OETERNPIE OIL ' ' CHARGE FOLLOco.poW IN T• r -001 ` SECTION: FOLLOW IN.IN OBTAIN S.TO • ODTAIN DISCHARGE IN � SECTION•AT AS- TONED DEPTH 7,OBTAIN 1.----.• FAr IS,A DOPE RATIO •/• (F-F) • 73 ANDND al, 7';THEN . o, D,.D� -al NOMOGRAPH FOR FLOW : IN TRIANGULAR CHANNELS Figure 6 4=0.03J• CHART 34 4 _ • - - _..Y _.M _- -' - • nu_ 1----- -- l: _ _ . - -___ - -- .' r � _- ��_��- ___ � "" �- - -- I ._: a5 err - - ■.r .rr r r_■ ___ __.__t._____ ___.__.._ _.._—__-_ 6 j.` r iri ii A. . r a 'MEW _ ----. S ig__ _il 1 ' ' - - T _ ....- rC ��y— r�— 4 wii i HHrr _ }_ 1^_ - -- r�iir - - �rirrr�� ae - - I-Errii-T-_-:T.1-1-7 4----—:::::if _.E..=--"-- —` — 1_1 `=' „Argo .rT_.___ _ : - ;: __—_ Lam____ _IMMEN _ —Likirli irek. a is �� :. Oear__ -----..�-__ _ IMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII S - rr j35 �� ._!.._ �:-�� -: =art===:-. __� _ IV ¶ v . 7 O /0 20 30 40 50 60. 70 BO ' .90 /00 JoB No/ "°Gt"/ - I` 0 1 ENGINEERS f � I PLANNERS SHEET J OF -�,ram(�,� se.cor74-,(i Us//ems ter' 'C PROJECT Pi' E�/ll...e- OCi.` DATE Aid i 7f SUBJECT T&--- Z e- P DESIGNED /.0#.CHECKED 1� ! ' I I 1 11 1 I I I I ( _ IIII 11 ' 1 � t I ! I : - . 1 1 1 A 1 I 1 11 ( i i 1 _' t ` I I i 1 1 1 _1 LT:Ae,ili___ 1 . 1 1 t _ I 1 11 1 1 1 e al- t , t ; Iii ; ; 1 t1 , I , : ! ; : , ! 1 i 1 IIrI 1 : I r ' I • 1 _j__ 1 1 1 v'—a-,- i './ i cq 11crrirr e 1 1 11 _1 1 1 1 1 1 , t ; _i-- I I p I i - I __�_._� � I I I ___ ! 111 , 1 ! I ' I I i -i zr }�I� _t _c_ ' cif' 1 Q�, 1 .—�-- I 1 I I ._ 1 I 1 1 I , II 11 . , 1_474,i-ikkiel_r-Lielte'e., J. i 1, i i 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1-7 ' . ; ' I i 1 1 I i 1 ' 1 1 , . i 1 1 i- 11 1 t I 1 . I 1 : 1 24i�_ar- ` oe'J, .er d,;j-i+1 rh = 61, 031 1 1 ' I Ii i 1 , , 1 ! 1 ;--I , , 1 1 . 1 1 I 1 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 S11o�e + I_ , _..CSrg 1 ! 1 i 1 1 1 11 ! I ! I C1 1 1 ; 1 I 1I 1 -r =- /e . . -� ! 124, 1 _—� I I I I i I I —1 I 2' ' 6lu)' 1 I I I I II ! I I I I I i 1= )12 it, fa/ ,3 1 I i I ;�cea rrb,c� I ,Z = 1 Y, I74ii i I • 1 , I _ II I 11 _1 I I I i 1 �a' I t 1 1 1 I ! I' 1 1 1 I II t _I_ I. ' r is I I j j ! ' 1 _._! I ! _ • I _ r ; I I i I I I ! _L 1 _ _1— 11 I I I I 1 101 J - • i1 ' i ! 1 q i a'-F-S • '. 1 1 t [ i I t I • I 11 I- I I 1 1 1 1 1 1...1 I f I--_ . i 1 '. ; 1 1 ; ' I 1 1 1�C�i. li i .. I ; 11 1 —I— ! , 111 , I I i— __ 1 ' _._. I ! ;- ' ! I i l ' 1 1 1 I 1 , 11 _r _-,_ i _1 I , 1 �_ :� - . _ f 1 _ _f j 1 I I i.. A ENGINEERS JOB NO./34o-GC+/-!!! g PLANNERS -'��_. / SHEET OF q PROJECT ! �i"e. iU7 -e k-p "/Se. DATE /y OV I 7/ SUBJECT / SC/ DESIGNED ii7e CHECKEDPS4 II 11 I I III 11111111II I 1 I I I i i 1 i l I I I I I - eLle -4-f_Zo_e.4.) i - i 1 1 I I I 11 I I s 1 I '_ ! I I i'I i I I I 1 1 1 j I 'i - I -? ' 13 `j . —a I--A/0 _�l�I I I I 1 I _,__1 -7744-16u5le /4II- e_kieh_14_JeZs . _l I I I ,i 1 I ' i t I I i I I ` ' + 1 I II I i I i 1 1 1 !1!. I __;-� i i_ 1 I I I_ 1 i ` I _L I I [ I I ! I I I ; I I I I 7: i -e./...i- 1,„... i lil II 1 I I I p i 1 I 1 1 , rim ._ _` I lr---,�3--- I I I ! 1 1 4 -+ lil ''-=, _‘____.4_61 g 111 i1 ' I1i ! II i __`!gT i '' I i1 II It { _ 1 I __, I Il ' P I li Il T ; I 1 I 1 • I Hfti _ 17 liriz .- II I I I I i I I liar I omit" a111�� 11" —r,i. t6 J LW--f I 31 I 1I —� J� . =II • �I -�d 1 ! I � I I I , i I I I + R 1 1 i _ --1 i i T ' i 1 Ii- - ! —, ! r s I ; : I , � 1 I_ I 1 I 1 1 1 -- i p I ENGINEERS JOB No/-368-06/7V - I �0 PLANNERS"/ �-~ / SHEET .J OF PROJECT ! A e cF:.:A7 4--'P /o r'! r e DATE NO 1!i Q SUBJECT I E J C- P t DESIGNED JeCk• CHECKED j /4 1 i lllll ; 1 1111 II III III } ii II I II i I I l' it co. " 4 v i _ie tIi iIIi1 ! I1I i i 1- , 1 11 1ii Y"_I_ „--1 4-I _ 1 .s ' 1 i 1 .11 '_ 1 i 1 7 55 6_35);1 11 1 I 1 11 III 111i1 -1I1 f11 11I ; , J1 11 • ! ' i I I I I l I 1 1 I� I i I 1 1 1 I ._ 1 1 i I I Li i +� -1 I �J I I I i 1 , i 1 1 1 1 h I 1 1 1 1} I ! ! I _I i I I i t I I (� i t ! Li II �- , I as ; __._ I 1 ' 1 I 1 i 1 , 1 '_ 1 1 i ! 1 1 1 , 1 i I l i IIII ; I 1 1 ! I t I I ! ! L 11 I_. I ' L ' I I 11 ! i I I 1 `l '. T i__G3✓ '._..J/ • I tr ) I I I f 1�--1 j ; 1. ' l ' l f- 1 1 1 1 1 II . I I I I ,�:...! I I f ! I 7 - 1 1 1 1 1 II I ' - I I i I , 1 1 1 1 1 -1-, Ie I 1 � i�._'�_.e� I 1 i ego � ly-I � 1 1 - ! I l l�i li 1 . 1 1 - ./.1,1,. 1 i aft/ ' j ! I 1 1 ! ! ! I ' II __�I 1 l ' ! I1111 I I I i ' Li I � '= I i3 I d I i i 1 1 I ' __—1 1 I _I in 'i ' I i I 1 1 I H 1 1 1 1 I i j 1 r.�. I I , � � I , , ; � I 1 I I I ii i 92 -1,C.;- I I I : , 1 I 1 . I I I . , I I i9•, _a1 . 1 ( 1 11 I J 1 1 , I 1 I i � 1 1111 I I I I , 1 II I I � _ ' . 87 c ,,Sxthe, ' 1 I I 1 I i WW1 T I I I I 1 I I_ ' 1 1 ! I _ I I j i . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I 1 I. 1 1 _f 1L .71_ J 7I I PI_ 1 i_ ,.i- . i 1 : Hlii .1 Hum-Hill 1 _I 1 j f I -1. I- i -I I — -7 • 0 I ENGINEERS JOB NOL:9hs -col- �Q � PLANNERS (may{ •- SHEET 1 OF PROJECT 7 e Enl'ep- f"'/c e DATE /V O v• 7 9 SUBJECT L -S C DESIGNED Rd CHECKED #4 IIIII ! � II II I illII 1 i i ' ! af�t}-/ c._.c _i_ip-r1a N G r Is.%zl i_e_ I _ '_ I I II I �. 1 1 i I , 1, 1 1_ _ :4-4.J I__ :5 c Z ?_ //IY`�}_r ` 426.,t/.4, , i I I I I ► 11f1 II I I11 --' I i ! I I i i i l I -- 1 i I ! ILI .II 1Th e i R,. e I a - ! -ceifrr IES e - ' I ._L I I I I I 7 1 i- : I I ! i I iS .48 fl n'o o! -4:�tlLl A r- ► cL _t.k..Ji,7'4 l` ! I I .I I I I ! �� ; ! I 1 � I� ! 1 !. % laIG)- _s . I ' -I-- I 1 , I i ! ! I1 ! � � i . � 1=' i 11 1 ! I 7-6 c ! .ski A2_4- - I r;0.4 'e I mo! ie'e I ii III ` i I iIi I SAD f t�' _lo _I4-l � ; ram* e _`a —1-- 1 1 1 ! I I i I I _fH 1_ ! I : 1 1 !±IThItFHfH , , 1 t1L 1i I111 1i ; ' 1 ! ! i I ! 418� doo -ice Z)L* -1H I 1 106 t.ice 17 i 1 1 i 1 I I 1 i..1 1 1 1 i i 1 I aim . i i__ _, , i Hi 1 . . .,, z_rriic:i • • ! I `11 1I1I ! 111 ■ 1 �■�M 1 i eie4.4...LA.: a1'- '- - 1 1r II 1 MIMI i1t3 1 �O�v 1 I ! i , ■■•fin_ 1 o o_ ; 'A • - ' e't'i 3z 4 :=1 ! 3 5'� � 1 .• 1 I I `nr 7 i ■� I I 1 i t L.L..--1 sammEmi ? _t, - ... ! �I _e r a AI - l' _ I I Ill ]l I I I I I I ill I I 1 i l l i I -- I I I p -le 11=� zyx GLi-4;f4 Nos i � vm• • 1._ I i H-1 I i 11 1-4 II f � 1 ' I � I I , IdeO .1MIE� s ,-?tM,: IJ ,1,4, . OJ1I M _ _ 1 _ _. I 1-1-1 ; I ; . - -1,---! 1 i T- 4 n ' LAS VEGAS.NEVADA PROJECTTI' g" FNTFr'•g'1.ISF"—SE'ent.+n Pucrra^n;•:1)fVl-i SHEET OF '3 AinU 7 SEATTLE.WASHINGTON JOB 1.40. 1`— 3 L+A^0 Q 1 — 79 1 DES. f,ihff ASPukhEiLS C.. POA7LAND,OREGON I'O'F CURVE Z. S — YEAR—. .DATE IN1TIAi. Tc Tc A C— ICA I O PIPE DATA Q1 VI V PIPE FLOW DG:TiON : (min) (m(n) (Acres) (Acres) (Inlhr) (cfs1 (it) (qp) (in.) (cis) (fos) (fps) TIME-1,7%W REMkRK_ G1.14;*2 64 4 n,;u .31 .9. ,2.g 3, - .90 17—q`' To . 12" ,L 5,75 3,5 , ,oz4 (a.3Mia. CRC= 51 -r=.Tc.) 5,51,1) .2O ,C1 .1a 3,4- ,6! 150 Z,5% 1Z: 3, 3775 =.o;.1 6.3 rniu, L"1 43mi,i, I, ( ,85 , I4 3.0 2. 3 8 4% 12." 3.6 4,75 5,,z5 SECOMA BUSINESS PARK - 233-001-781 t—' PROJECT NO. 1Ci fe�,•1e SPARKS,NEVADA•SEATTLE.WASHINGTON•LAS VEGAS.NEVADA•PORTLAND.OREGON PLATE 7o.— C.01 / /77: j✓a;:' a 5c0/e Pro°osec/ Prcjec/ / L o c cal,,O/J EX/S1%7y 5i!"c Co/i.Triba/,ry rca. a/7 ,7 ,645.s / Corniro/s 2 C Cc/co/S/0,25// Ex,sTry S,/le y c/-o%r y 3 • °e'en//a,i 10/u1 me /�c�r Cori/ri/Ju/i,;29 �irec� i4 ic/ro/U�c y S Or,/ce Si)e C/osec/ De/en/,orj Sys/ersi (a Recor,27c 'oofXb, 7 Fyures I Con/r;b i1i,y Arec, fa oo a MaAcf ecJ 2 Ve/oc,/y 5%ee} 8 3 /-D- !' Curve % i Rano,[ Coe yt, ;Z4,' 5 574ora9e i/v,,,e f Time // &, C/aseo" . e/en Sy.s><e.,, /2 7 Ui/ p J/O1%O 7 Con/re/ /3 8 6 5 x 4/0 Prockc/ 12G1a// /h/ 9 Cs'X </o llrea. /5 . _. :` 0 I ENGINEERS JOB No. 1-23R-Ot/i._.N' 1 Er Q PLANNERS sHEET I OF __ .._ PROJECT Se!r•rule: Rusir,rrs A DATE IL- /6"» SUBJECT 4V0/r-a rJf r_ r ,P,,9rt DESIGNED We CHECKED _•, 1_J I I I - - I I i I I I _-T1111i' I Ii LH±i±±i±H 1 1 i t I I _.'�� _. ,rc)aze_jc4n. c>` _f Ike-, I-..4.Lze. . uuj:JA I c.4 71-ii 1 i =-- YP/�J��i1 _I 1 ._lo_rVr,/4,;'.n.:_.__A :erc :__GcJ_//./ _+7P.__?R_._.GD.1.�t_PG_...__-I-_- . -i -_.L1R1._ /6 _�� i•,e4;'G"..liS. �?►7.Gf._.,' o lct I rC7.n1.S.T Pc. . ! i ' • OIL—/O_% ��•:,.aL e,,-I ! ..,_ I .�ccess.:- 6_._.f�'.i a;-1Li fi_i/ ! I ,_,4,o 1 , 1j_ 1 ii ! I ' ► I111. 1 11 i IT-I 1 i I f i I , 1 i- I - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I - 1 1 - I I 1 / 11 I ! I ! 1 -11 i ! 1 , . I ; - _� Ld.G /4 7 I I I i 1 , I 1 ! I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 : 11; r I I�� .,„i. .4;4! J)1S ' /_ .,�' . 1 /.j�L I IIL. 1 , illy j�4e. P,/e' 1 _ _/1 -el I__ /74 i c ii7 o )Ir I • I 11 �l�S l�r�.- P/= I {i ��=r1 f�� 11' I I I 1 // _(%s/iN�• .�/.I r_I 1�.of•%/• c•o1��1+i ,r5I rr .�j ,1� 1 1 1 • ( , I�io I , 1 1 c, , i i ,Y I I - , I I I I i , _ • 1 as I I l ARV; , r f , I i I- - III II I ■■ I ■ ■■■ I , �I 1 1 l 1 ■ I ■�■__ I .1 . -,�7:57/4 s•41redi I as I EIMENEEMEIREMBINIMI I ___ ___ ii• iT4r 1 S))1 �._,s_J - - ET f TJ 1 �. I 1 Ir-j�t/. / _ 1 + •., , . . / 1 , ,, _ , .- , If 1 1 I 1 - I .. • . / . .I ,. - .` ' 0 VI4 ' it . - Ki . . I I__•__ If-P' n , _1 1,4 , 1w ■ 1 I I I I 1 1 � �/SLS •I I I r ' I _ IT I I I I /.-, , . H A l- 'i ' �/. f .4r:.. -i x(j 1 1 , 1-7 , 1.-4--_ _1 .1 1_I _LI I I I I Ri11i. i _iiH11ei I _ , • l .. - r i : i I I f T-i i -1-i T� I I 1 11�"1 1. 171 _i-f t 1-1 1 1 1 i " --f r ENGINEERS sae No. /-2?�401..,L9 PLANNERS SHEET PROJECT •DATE • SUBJECT DESIGNED CHECKED __ ! 1 1kkilz4:141.6_,2_,&) I .41 ._. `lam! ,Z ' / I� ! 1 ' 1 --�,�! -CLT ��ri 'JrlL . ' Q_'.r 7rt r4 S I 1 --_ ..Y�LIa�.C! _1/' 5_l.CLAi i�e n5 C f�.-' /171a3 n I • -/7 i !_ + 1 Jc'thI LM.ZI_ 7rr� 'hc/-- _..:5 i..*.�.hP ./s_► I •I I I J �• i ! ; i74.-,_;,,vi_l, : 1 1 . i 4.,--.- 2, ---ty,,,,-,,i : • 1 _cr_k 4,p 71k " I I v I .-%.: ,�"f�� 71iiF ilkiirl, — I_i _ _ i v' ( s I I ._;__. i,4 .eGG4.1 Ll�[y' / l�Y ,1.0)/,,- E l'.1/JJ le 1 Q Tl, i i I !__ � i �4 ' ' - _io 3� ,L14o. c. !! •ram I 1 ; ' r I �i A / )0'Al I L e I i `H - Et I I I I I -11 II ii � I ! � � IIIL ' . MEM III E. . , _i_ ! /!.Alf I MEW AIME,I : - ►��ll.�J1aM-Mr'AIM I I I }-, : , 1 A 1 ! - . , :.. 11i1 1 !19' 1! '1 BS, I I I 1 �' s • ..,;__._atie r's.13e ' I - I..1r 1 I I 1 i,o. 1� /y .�.,,. 1 ' o.pf. nri. . 1 r. _ , i .. JacHir ' �.�I I IY isC I ' I 1 •�10 , 1 I I 1 I I _L. _ •I I I ! i I I _I _, , 1 t 1 •_I 1 ' ! 1 _._T_._�_+_.I .: 1 _ i ;- ''- ' 1 --I I -1 I I I i ! HI I i iH 17 ! 1 i , I 1 i i .. ...r..._ ��1t ( I -f1 I I .-- .. I I _i_ ' I I— r 1 1 1 �t ! ! E I ---! l I ' _-----I f 1 ! ! ! i i l ! 1 i !�1 I I 11 T. I I I J ; I I I I ! ` _ I I . I ! 1 ` ' I I-; -�,__I _ _ • 11 1 , ._I. I I 1 - i i i I 1 1 r--r- +-Hi i-i 1-T-1-MI ] II II I` D 1 ENGINEERS JOB tvo./'z33-U/-/�75!_ r'0 PLANNERS •� SHEET J OF_.,y_,_,_„ I PROJECT DATE SUBJECT !DESIGNED CHECKED 11 . ( �/ 11 ' I _,_ rl 1 I I ' I I } I i .. -T i I 1 1 I Iil' I I / : I , - 1► I ►T-7 1 ! 1TIIX ?4_rllrr2jial ; __ /- 7 A II 1 r I 1 _ 1 ! Ca 2 E _iio1—. T/r_2! d*_ 1 -15-1 2. fh I I� I _j_J i __. ' I I i ! 1 1 I ' ' IIh ,22'l— I _i _ ; : II ; iIII ! _j 1111r11II� , i `' I ! 1 — i i t I I I PI�:_I��=1 ��_f !=I .2l ' r I r i , �_i_ I i i ! I I I I .__ I I I I I I I I I I. 1 1 ! : I 1 ! I I 1 S' ,I ,L I I I II { II : L! I ; : 11I111 I I .I I I I I I z,%; '� /1."_�,,-k 1`.,104,_ Q /1;3e bp7),�,,,�, I ! I 74h I i,;-)' s I_, .d,-.''' .tee c .I. ! '+ ' .. -I� l 1 1 vl): r A =I. G2d ! I ; I r I I 11i ! 11I11 III1 1ii1Ii I � I I II _ ,-v / I I , I I I i ' I ra e 7/ f rJ,7 i 77i .,-I I _ 1jl it I I � _ ; _I I - I I .� I I , 1 _ I I IH - 1 �I �I— { ! ( IIi. I I I I I r II I ! I I ` 1 i 1 . /V ' ) f4Dj• 1 I/,? E I • i I - I ■ii 11 ! 1 ! I i .1 ! 1 ' I ___L 1i � 1 1II1111 1 111 = A , " _ _ d , i 1 I .., "a , _ I L I I I ! 0 - / ,r ,'7 5' ,4 c1 ,l')I C I I ! iI iII !_ I . e - a 3_ . . = .r-�1 r i,11 1 H I ■ ER . I ■E I I ' I _1 I J. II ' � �.11 �� r..rt7� I �I ' +L1L . _.'_ pun op maps 0 Ate, 4- Are ,,'e75_ I I '_ _ __ I I _ -1—TT ; , 1 1 i ! _ _._ • . i .* H j---i . 1 Jt1H i il� rl� t ft+fH 11 0 I • ENGINEERS ,oe No:1-233-�i-_�[_ r'0 PLANNERS SHEET 1/ OF_ PROJECT DATE SUBJECT DESIGNED CHECKED _ 1 _L ! ! !-_,I_!!___!_.tom j.� I I I I I I ! I I I I -- ;_ �!Jisi .i'(2,;4,2.,:z .„..., rc,.2,9)' 1 ' 1. ! ! !..' ' - . _..� I } II. ,/0.9 e a r s I �l 11 1 _ ! 144 �1 �Z1:--C_ very F' ... j=_ : Ci_e/e)! I I I€_ i 1 1——�I i 1 1 1 i : T�i _I I ! 1 I - I I I ! ' i ?i,08.6)_i I 1 I i I 1 1 _._—_� . I 1 1 ! ! E -i_- 11 _ IH-H— • 1 1 . �I '_y dij I ! 1 _i_ 1 LT I ' 1. i i i ! � �I f ! I I ( I � ! i I I I I I ! E Dei-i.j,,J.�� __Aow�e.V 11 1 1 I I I I I I .. li ': ! IIIIII1117 111 111 XL,/ I i 1 f . n. XL f I{Ht* + /H' ;L4YH) G(< l 1 1 i ! I I L. 1 ! I ' J -d�s '= i _Br ; L p 1,0,1 T _� I 1 I I I i. I ; 1___ 1_,_j_.J5'Ti •! i i I ! I�1 ! E I !w�F P1 .l , . Ij IIji111TT I II I i E• _I_ I I I._� J ; S I t " r� I S itt474P I Yct IC/JAov 1 r.. IjlI Ij1 1111 ! 11 . .I 11 ! I i 1 1 • ! I t I y. I iI7 PI.}i/G /� , 4 I 1 Y`10j, � iteo/6 OW/ I b -4.�A' I 1 I I I ( . kJ.��i ,inI I/r/ ,vrif�5 I I I I I he 14-syo, ( . 1 .y�.rel ! i I 11d` 6 I I 1 I it I � I I 1 I ! I r. _ rce,5. 7.k/ ip-iI40 A I ! I I H—I 11 I I I r Ai.e-cll i I r�i 1 I ! 1 I I I I lei I I ! II 1 Ik ; E i 7" E-�ss f l 142/1.,//q,Il. I If IIIIil • I 1 _ 76,1I ,,E:,j e.1- ! I 1 I I 11 ti'• � ! ! !- ? s'n . 7af) 1/j)('O1r I ; I I } I ! I 1 7.01L Ti - I' I L. I - ..4( 1 li2;- A� L 1 I I I__i._ III ( I1 11 ! l I ! i —!..-J_ I r _ I-';* (�A ) I f..__l_-2-2;��('!.��, U.86J-1 ! i I _i 4 r I � ; i j I I_��t o I I 1 I �I I I I_ 1 1 j---;- ----j. � l i s ( I----;'_t E N i II - ��BJ'S� �1_I I. I J_I T- 1 I � �i l i HHH- 11 I I I T T .. I I I --TT-I-.1.._f-..3- 1` Q ENGINEERS roe NO, /-23?-aP1-ig/ 0 PLANNERS t- SHEET J OF_. r PROJECT DATE SUBJECT DESIGNED CHECKED )--E I17 + k I 1 I I I '-1--- i I I I r I I I 1- i ; i 1 Y i ! i ! i I • ,- -' x i�( l I j I 1 i l Tfl I II I I i E ; r� - 2n 1I I_HLJaJ& r)_ ; H 1 I _ u6V.y II I i i I I I H 11111T T;iiiir ! 1 ! i I7 ! .,1 iU�• . sd 1/� '1 , i I ! i I I i I. 02> „ ,.),rL3r�s I ! ! ! ! ! ' ! i I + ! I I ! I ! ! ! I I 1 ! I _I__! . i i ! I ! }..�1 iiv I . , ' ! -_J f.1 c4./1- . I I 1 f Imor I ' I • I I . , , _ I, .. , � t j 1 •. _._ . /l I '. a. . I i I i I j I ; I _ I I l� I ��"/ 1 1 r s L �a �7/1!�! 11111111.1111111 ! 1 } 1 1 � II "i ; �1� 1 1 1 ! ( „t r�H , -Fri n!,.s__1_ I I I fI I I i I 111 - I1 1 I ! 10� . -i .i .r- 2 I ,1 I 1 ! 1 I J I i _i_ _ I r 1 I I I I i _ 1 1121,2a1,11111 ,' -ICI#. e . - 1'J�.I!!�• :/�. �,. f. �. - . ,. -., i I `' ,U 7i' do, J '.1 - 1► _//i/7I` 71 / I G7Y1/i./.rel I e c../—... L.,/1 1, . ...-/ 44.sic..e.c.fecK. 1 .7---- • • - i , , s. c a - �JJJ.L61 1,; I �,_--_ . il:.f I,z i . 3 0 r 1>' I czsPI/ 1 IVL_ I 1 I I I � 1 ! i r 1 ; I I I '!_ 1 ! .L. 7-1_-.- - • - . ■1iU1, , I 1 1_!1- 1 I 11 ! 1111111111111 , •v I _I 1L , ! I ! _ i ! I , i- . ,milI W I 1 1^ l I l i l i . , rF—FtFH � --Ir ■1 I1 I I .I I 1 1 1 1- 1 l 1 I T-I - 0 ENGINEERS Joe NO./-233-O0/-24 L — eI! ii PLANNERS SHEET 6 OF_,_,,,___ PROJECT DATE SUBJECT DESIGNED CHECKED I' r I I • I , f I 1 !.Or_.,' el_.Si>je ..1_.. _ I�_ 1 1 ` t 1 I I 1 i _ -; .. isihi ! , � _..� l ;I'_— II { ' i • i I 1 _ '-i ' __fi n! I I ! /1 1 !r J —1—. ' I 1 i : ; i I L+.J�.e G.' i. rg�.- r1a I ri7• I r1r,If!C�! 1 1__i.._. • • i { � 11 I ! I I L.�.I ! ,�.ij I I I i I I : I ; ._ : 113 ! I ! t 1 ', I i . I t / I424ziI I � 1 �. I ( 1 I 1 ! ! I ! I I I I.j 1 1 I. 1 131 =i ).._ f ek. 1 I . _1 ! ! I ! I i 1 ! I I ! I -„ :1 1 1 I ! 1 1 I 1 ! ; _CIF +ti�a o s r ' 1 L._ I1-1 II ! ! ! I { ! ! ; 1Iic 1 ' ! 1 1 III i I i 1 i I i ►' { 1 17 rail �/} ' i l i l 1 1 1 ! i I ! I I ;"`� ' I _o r�, -�•e,�f ! 1 ' ! G'�f-rstrlfi>n 1 i I 1 . ' 1 I I I_ i I de_i' .7inlr-t)1 ! I I !— i ! ! �' j LI { I I ! I�T I 1 ; t ! ! I f I I iii 1 1 1 ! T i i I -T I 1 i i I I 1 i I. ! ' I I I 1 ,4 . N. • , ( a (�8I) 1 I ! ; I I Li 1 1 1 ! 1 . 1 1 1 1 ! 1 I 1 I I I _. --I ,� l��Ig ` d I ! I I 1 1 I l— j 1 I I r I I ILLH—' / _ yp - I I III -° ! 1/-'1/4 j � I 1 �- I ' � __ 1; I n = 75, e./I I ! i 9,ocp I I__i_ IIl ! l il/! i1 111 ! ii ' I I ! i1See_ ,6".;I„t, - --'! 'd i 1 ll , i • 1 ' I ! L I 1 �; ,rl I i 1 II 11 ;i '� / c^ J I1t, ' i 1 �i� v 5l`� ( �Cp Fi y. (�- e Vn' niII 1 l- - 1 I 1_,� f 'al/}.— ' �i 1 ? ..s,_46 ' 1341" ( cant J • ' ; ' i ! l I I 11 I_ I . I 1 - ! I I 1 1 # �I _. 1 P� I rrJ/LL,Q I a 1 1 I 4i I .� i I ' 1 i 1_I /I I __- ,ar I�es �e.��-�tl.3s i i i 1 ! . 1 I I . 1 ' I I .eas 'e�� '.. i0,5�T7j ._ _ (sae__ravz_e i ' I {4. cicecc ; i 12.I .s _.=.._ -- ---- ._.' ' . IF i __ ..1�T �d' ' V.0_42i i . Loy' �kQble_..__33e. :�i it-- I I H I1I1Ill- 1 i t I., U 1ENGINEERS JOB NO, Er-Q PLANNERS SHEET / OF • PROJECT DATE SUBJECT DESIGNED CHECKED 1 { 1 ' I ' I Lt I L I 1 1 I t i I ! 1 I I I I I j . 1 � 1- 1•-;1 1 I I _1 1. ''Co i �i.I.74,_ 51.. ► ._ I _ - -. _iCilf. rJ1 n.oral % rcY :_L.v_ga ? da} 11k1 )ICI1.I/ram /_ lide� rc�e%e14di _ . /L/i/ !be I i !_ i -i � � CI , ; + t 1 I 1 � t t _ g2:w2er/ b . .�sn I nt__l¢!. _clnis. ! r-/.-_,�-.r}_c4a —i— _701�� i o:5 1 1s- Q. l�l_�_G;�2i_;/ 7..1Jr,,�. a� rk I 1 - ._..-1: K ° ��! Jn2.dn �Fi'!Io .!__'27Q720 1 1 ii � "� %yq"[Ct1PAI ' 1 , 11 I _ ' he._..'_. .2..� _',s � 1 ' 1 1 I I I i I ',3'6i rocI/ 1 I .a,2 -eci.._!��q _ _i• 1 ,y..7 . ' ch 1 1 ' ' 1 �. 0 s �_ 1 Io .c/ � � . _: ,ir.L!�i�Cj313.8_ , — • /��_ /2�Lz ' I t t I ri,ir 1 _e1 ' /.S• l/1Z 1 1 f�e 2�/ , I 1 ,-,..+_re,�..�1rr'sr-/� ti I I 1 1 I I T.�j . 17 a' r I ' V i '4''�_L%17_r_e: rf :erZ' • cal I ., {— t i�:;-ns-S1� _2a: . � .:sj i i{Ji/�__': e.. Grady,_ .e�/ 1 1 rn, I -_ '1 ! 'r 1 ' - pi e_ ' acute_ I 'r<I_-j�-.'�.l2) -G�`- ► ,� I . i`iJrriri, ,/ ,o! J 1PI IYi I ,�i I if/,�if-• - IJrs Y . I ' FYI hb7 . itzII e /17rc✓ O, 171 ?, S.4.CJXrJ-r 1 I ' , 1 �I I r 1 ' n . I ! I t , p7.7.64 � = r : t t I lb,:1 he I tr./ I I . I I i . T-1 I I . . I 1 I ! 11 1 �.I i i I1 ' I ' 1l i —I�1 I 1 j ,—,---+ I : ! i { I t i 11 1 I I • I , i i I ` --� _Li am_ 11 1 1 I I ` i !.l_ I • f l l J�1 !1 i'_ I L I ! I' ;- I1 ; ' _ ? ' I 1 I , '___,___1.. ' I , ! I I l t ' I + 1 1 l l i l ��_` ! ' Iit I _ II l � 1111 , --II_._ I I I I I II IIli I ' J i lllil I 1 II II lilt . 1 ! f • .I. ! 1- ! i I ! i I i 1 1 I II J f ! i l i l Ii 11lI: 1 I I . I 1 � �� I�• ___' 1 I .I ► i. i I f i l l 1 I ' . { I 1 11 Il Ili i ! - - I ' 1If H_tiH • . 1 1 IT - i . 0 0 0 0 0 ui Cr M N f� tD U7 M• (NJ — , 0 I N • t/1 0 U Li_ $ 0 z ? Millt , - w,„ z (r),,, O ary. o w ,-_- _, 'amp.PlinialiMarMiniiiriiiiiiiiiiii n1 I11I1IIUIUI■C■■ �6au. > ui eii1:■Wil .:EIili1iil ■ 1� 111110 x r iiiiiiaiiiIIIiiii! !i i.iHia� MINI■■ • �■,■ li IA IiIIiidiiiJ� a. � .'6,0 ., lip. w.N Pozi g qi.busimbAilibunk ! }? witill Ihii z (El ccow ill i . 1 - iriluolimmieriv . .p. : . ...1 ,,,, ,,, i gni ,. kilt . :_-,;,,, >-0 '''�a'pyIiII W 0 IIIiIIIIu1 I 1N e Iii' a 0 0 0 o m cD n. ,D vn Cr rc) N °. • LI) Q r1 N — . iN30 aid NI 3dOlS 3S81103831VM Figure 1 urn aaa ■alanr/a■aaau■/1N/■■au>I�R �./ — • al ■■ ■■ a■/uarlass uiiasaallpiaa H_I11mIIlIlmIIflflh1i11IIiI aw■ /iis!■ sasa�rslaaar llll =laal■ aala ■uuu l iaa a■ll/ ■saaIINau�IllUlaalaa ■ail■! / ■ ilnrlaa! aalaiabalalallalurlinlai aria lllawanni ■ a ■iaaaI �aaaalalila ■.11 in ■ laaawoaa■ ■ aaal■a■ aa/a■aal■lalllln raa 11111HIH 1 ii H iiiiiiIIII1H11H11111111 1 '- a/ aalal aaaaslaawa ■ mil a a■a■a■iss w■i/aa■aaitnl ni a lallaaa■aalaa■a■asN /s■Or ■a■ T: I : . 111ilIHHu1111E1H111i1IIII1H1111i11H1lh11'11IIt' 1 al!'wa■laaaaaaaaaaw.iva.a■aaaa/a!a■a■aa■a!a■alwaawaaa/p[In.aa IIRM;ILIMP. 1H11111111111HIH1111111111111EH1a/"/a■a.t,l�.n;- aiaasaalri . • _ -'aaa in u IHIIHI=I� I/H1IH111 HI111- i ' I ��11H1 aat/■ar a! .aaa■alwaa ■lasasaaaaa ssaa aau!!w MINN allilIna i , �•t1 . IHl1 IIII IIIIiom III ii1111 - 1 , 1 111�1111 . . II i , • illhlllllhlllllllllhllllllhllllll H 11N11 I1 , J11 F • 1 ' HIIHIO 1I11HI111111U11E111 111 0 `tiamwawaw aawwaalsaaaa aaaauaalasa■aas■ wain) lllallI11 alll 1 ® 1 H HH 1111H1 IO1III II 11f1 waaat�aa u aa•a! waaa■aaa■aa ■a■■!a/ `■aaa■ralaaw ■aa■lil r.al■ Mam MI�at $uu»iUUuI%aaaarau Uaaieauu1n aaMIIIJ[/wauaN% w■aar:w�a�laaiaa■laalwla//aaaaawu■laaa■■/a/aeaaaaawawi■ne■uaal it 1111 111111H11111111HIH=H1IIIIIHIIII®�1Hf11lii HIIkil 1i1Ci1C:11ii' i1ii��i1�H%/IHi�1i11il�i�i�11I=11 • ■awaawl■■aawalalaawwa■aas■aaaaannaalli■ ■aasaaaaawaai=r�.uraa■k ■aww■asa■a■�awaawwlaaiu/aaliiaa!■ aiaalaaaaaasawaw■.i>sr.laaail+� waawaaaElwaaa■Yaauwauaa/iaaa isaaaaaaallsauaaala■anua//lllnlaas is walaasaaaaassssawiaaa ■■lalalaaawl—■=■a■ nllliilaau iffiriTITEINIMMEDIEMIIMMUMINIIIMW a■saaa/aawau■R UB/Ilaaaa►;�Q11h iII11B11 ■■wawawaw=awwaalisaaaaw/a■a a■aasa■aa uawuawa■1■l1aaR wsawswaalnaaaasw awwaaa■auu uaaaaaa■ulaaaawaial<alaaa w■awrrlw■wawaualwwuaauuaaw/uuuaa■asauwlwaalirlau ■► ■■waawrtrlarl■l/walwwaaaaaaaaawaaaaaaaaa/aaaaawaawala!!n ,!■ a_►i wiswaaaH■wrlwaawwa/a/aauawaaiaa!■aa■a■!al■aa aIYIIRIMaaaaa_\ , a/wwuaalAiwawangit/, 'a�aiaaauaaaaala/ II/lllaala/a waawawaliwawawuww/aa■■ ■ ■aaaaiaaaauaai 1JKlnlaaaaa�c) /aaiaawaMaaa[awaawwaaaaaiaaaw■aaa■alaauaaaawanalamanulaaaas>t tr aawwwawwaaw/awwaaa■alaaaaialaa■aalnlann llwallimai/alltnaaalaa r wallw■>rawwaawsaww■asa■aaaawaalaalaai■aulawaawlulri url{aaaaaa wa/saaalwswlwassaaaawllaaa■aaaaws■luaaMInal■iawa IMara �1■aaaal wla wMENInlwallillwaawwa■!la nH aaaawuaaaaaualaa/■lwaawalifill liaalaa wlaollal■aailawaaialaawaaaa■aaaawaa/lair alsallwasaltlinalta aalaa= waaw�■■asllalMaaaawliallMEEaa�saaaaa /aaalwaaaM1a11alnallss w■aww■alwt•awlawwaaalasaalwaaauIDa ■la■aa J1fl lt1/aaaasa w■■a■aalsaaaaawasiaaiawsaaaaaauaaa■allari asalaw inallallaasl i 1 ■aaaasatawEawalwwaa/a MIllnaalaal. aaaal! / �allsaaiaal p awliallaarauaalaalwa■aa■aaaawsasamiim aaaaaaaal 1/aaslpaaaaa/ w1iffralii11111111111111111111111 H111111�mall111H1 �' /wlaw�.aww■awlaawwalaaaaaaawaslaana�alanac.awlrririair�uwa■aaua wsaw ai■arsla■■aswwaaaaaaiaawaasaan snacsrlswrAVAIMI al,aaaala■ Wallwwawl■ aaMaaaawMaaassaawalla;sa■arar axial ►,a/,sra/uaamaa■ wasw aaai■a■ aasaaaa uala 1pla aagtlla►/1awalua■s ■awn�is �ilaw■aall ■aiia■ssaamaaaalaWon ' Dala 11lanruUwaaa/ni■a wuwallalaaalaw■saaawwasalaalsawaalaac. l �1`tnarlllaan ./waaaaa■s O aawwaiawaalaasluwuauaaaaaa saa IMPIRC.L:W4WAW aiawaaalaa ■iwraiw■ wallrn■slwaassaaaasaa�i■l!a■R11alalaNsMTAIlaarur walaalla aaaMawsMswa/ ■saaauaaawaa111mio mut!!.i/ws.ral�assaas asr■sYawssas ■alaaa■aslwuaaara.:711p�.%i/aarZ'riaslaalss■■ saasslawa sanlwaMaas■a■aaaaaaa■awsuuXaa=L'I,la/I il'.r�ji■s�/1■ws sasaa■ ants:��E i'i =yaa/�asalaaaaaas.all /.ardltllalplanawwa/asaaa iaa aiao�r:allure=•w�l►.>k:.awaaarlaaawa■■aaaa aaaEaasaaaaalaas■ssaaaw■ a...... �ry I prAgiwal//as■ rw�naiw�w■a■lC=111111aaa. 11a III II! :�ii �1' O I� i ■'" /' ill' , , loll■ a=■an ra■s amo %u//aawlwa0a■aMil alai ! asa lif■■ �sll�� aM `H aa■a mom ■asall ■ , �awml/ssnslla imil .laa■ �a awam ■ Iwwl/■l■aliii0rlt: l::i laIl wsaasi �ar=li=iswa�a _j 1 �r�:ivo .►.e/ a•.r iurni ullirnlilsArwilii=lr1w1�'iaair�ra , -r . rr , s�mania MUM a asai■auEalsa 1 p T i• , -r j FLAT ROLLING 0-5% 5% UNDEVELOPED LAND Wood $ Forest 0. 10 • 0. 15 Sparse Trees & Ground Cover 0. 15 0. 20 Light Grass to Bare Ground 0. 20 - 0. 25 DEVELOPED AREA Pavement & Roofs 0. 90 0.90 Gravel Roads & Parking Lots 0. 75 0. 80 City Business 0. 85 0. 90 Apartment Dwelling Areas 0. 80 0. 85 Industrial Areas (Heavy) 0. 70 0. 80 Industrial Areas (Light) 0.60 0. 70 Earth Shoulder .. 0. 50 0. 50 Playground 0. 25 0. 30 - Lawns , Meadows $ Pastures 0. 20 0. 25 Parks & Cemetery 0.15 0. 20- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre) 1 . 0-1. 5 DU/GA 0. 30 1 . 5-3. 0 DU/GA 0. 35 3. 0-3.5 DU/GA 0. 40 3. 5-4. 0 DU/GA 0.45 4 . 0-6. 0 DU/GA 0. 50 6. 0-9.0 DU/GA 0. 60 9. 0-15.0 DU/GA 0. 70 Figure 4 lu.e. (: U F-- I- F- F- F- 1- I- F- 1- I- C[ d 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 Q^• 0' C7 C CT O' Cl Cl C7 Cl C' CVM I-F- 0 O 0 O O O O O to O Cl)LL Cr to to d tO C' tO d to CC Z I 1 F I I I I I I I 0 W F'-' X Z F- F F F- F- I-- I-- 1- 1- 1- (1) .--.O to Irs to tn Ill tI) LP In U) UC1 X_.1 11 O N 11 O N II C.N 11 O N FI O N II C)N 11 C) N 11 O N II O N II O CV Z < 0 N + N + r -I- r^ + N + N + N + CV .- N i. N + L) f > tel V 1- N d'1- In to I- in in I--. VI C') F- to c*) 1-- In Q I- LA F- V)C) F w PI F- rr > C') 3 t„) > M 7.' Cr) cr > Cr y Cl) Cl)`.� >. d > 'C f) Ui A ..-. CC w v) Q C..9 t U Cr) N, In c W a F- °l o In d co to d >- C O )�.t C N 1 at o to o O 1 4 C I O ^ O 'a'Ic=c7) 1- O to I O OZ Cr I-C' dC7 r-- (OO• OQ I''') OCa' OC:L_f\ I-.- N `---Ite N r" N �-I LelI 'M M ^NV C�! u "may 1 + �'�. } ` + 1 } �, f- Q LL into ' ) +tn to to to to Ln LI) MI Z N N .---N N N N N N N N Il.--. I I I I 1 I I I I I 1- II t1 II 11 11 II 11 11 II II 1- F- I- 1- I- I- I- F- F I- uJ. - - C7 O -F F F- F- F- F- F- I- I- I--- a Q O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 CC'---.: C' Cr Cr C7 C' Cr Cr C7 O' Cl . Ccs1 -../ 1-1- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO LL Cl- t.O Cr to d tO d to d 'tO f CC Z I I I 1 I I I I I I 0 ow F- Z Z I- 'F F- F- F-I F- }- F- F- 1_ U) .-. to to to to U) r-- l) t In II) Io U) X_.1 II O CV II CD CV II O N 11 C)N II SIN It O N II N N it N CV II d N 1t Cr tV Z <0 N + N + O + O + tD ' tp + N -F N + tO -I- tO + CD Z> In a)F- v)aO 1- v) O F In O F- to/�F- to"c'1 I- (A u) I- 1/1 In I- IJI I- F VI.- F- Cp. UJ A CC uJ t)) _ Q 0 UJ In to CO LP LLI a F- COI to th C)I to O rl RI>- CC C CO O 1--- O r� O It) 0 N 0 O 1".... 0 '' 0 C 0 R)14) O Z N- .-d' CO Cr N Cr Cy LAI Cr O D. n O' CO C7 r` CD 1.-.-, - r I-- ^ram cr II ACM NI r-. a LLI in In In to to to In tI) Cn III UJ,'� N N N N N N N N N N [L.--. I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I F it It II II II II II II II It I- F 1- 1- I-- F- I- 1- F- F- A A A A A Lail Lau 3 w i. LU 3 w 3 w = o = 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 U. = LL. = u- = LL X LL- C) � F 0-4 F- 1... 1- I.- ... F- 3 Q 3 Q 3 Q Q 3 Q U_ LSJ F- LU I- WF- LUF- U t/C71 Lei /)) U (J) U 0) U ci) U Z w z .. Z ..• z z -CL. LL. O w 0 LL 0 LL 0 U. 0 , , U U U CC 0 U 0 0 CC 0 00 0 00 • LU = z . owiC F- V 0 = C &)) C) wF-- as o a.. Y = c/) (/) — --- 15 TABLE 2. VigIlrt• 5 z B a U) 0 S► "� aw 4 a A, N to 0 EA I-+ a t A z I a a 11.- H H 1 m _ z H CG Cr3 b• • --___ ,.. E., ` z . , Al 1-4 Kt 14 • : O 41 H z k.9 41 Et 41 -_ r-- A W 111 frse Z fA� 0 O > M $ 44 w C W°� a .0 o aR A a W .c a a U it o PQ E.. a A U �•H Ea - �F ~' = x.4 z Nm 1-4 �� X -ic Cxy U N HH J U Z. •hi ."...67"--...- .3 ii.:0..... 1 'C.V...C's, r-4 II �—1 , yt s z z1 ,c w a � Cif= 40 I . OPPSF'T FAME c.4A7E co 77'/4T fl '.ZwJGToA/PoLLu77oN DEVICE /a V/6/61-a A r E27G0 Op OPAN/NB AND G>/Ae•CTL.y. O V.E/Z 714A-LADDtE. • . AT ir ir ' O 5'M/N. DTa. GALV. CE3 — -- 4 ovEQFLow ,EZEV /I // WATER LE veL LAoDErt sm.,,m 4 GHA/N: 2oO 'cAPAG/7Y 9LAGC WNEN G.t7z/5 DOWN WELD CHA/N 7D C.B.FRZ4ME Iii_ E • S' - - lommrs, SLOPE Soq M/N. , Nuirmof WATE.QT/GJ/T — /./c•.a LOW W.RTFif GLEAN-ou7-GATE r ' W/M/N• 8 GAUGE SL/DE. --REST7tu¢ PLAm TYPE II - J wnN L o. /FicE CATCH BASlN cur/N P TE NOT.E: ' ALL. /y.QTAL P'AR.T3 AND SZRFACE.9 /yusT DE'MADE of COPQO5/ON-f=6S/3TANT.AlATE FAL O.Q GALVAN/Z..'D. FLOW RESTRICTOR / OIL POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE/ CATCH BASIN I v s' z' "_`'v,•�\' 9�/ .._.. ais H/GN WATER (o" •B--/.2^ ?/O RAG G" •oE-E-a M/N. • ,OVERFLOW Figure 7 PROJECT NO. „4.U,r"...4111 SPARKS,NEVADA•SEATTLE.WASHINGTON•LAS VEGAS,NEVADA•PORTLAND.OREOON PLATE • 50 I. PRODUCT DETAILS Table I-IS Design Details of Corrugated Steel Pipe-Arches'(2%x%In.) - Water- layout Dimensions 01am of Pipe way .. of Equal Periphery, Span, Rise, Area, B, R., R,, Rb; Inches Inches Inches Sq Ft inches Inches Inches Inches 15 18 i 11 1.1 41 3% I0%, 19r%a . t• 18 22 13 1.6 4% 4 11% 37%r 21 25 16 2.2 5% 4 12% 331 24 29 18 2.8 5% 41 14314 55 30 36 22 4.4 6% 5 18% 73% 36 43 27 6.4 7 51. 213fa 91fj 42 50 31 8.7 8 6 • 25% • . 97% 48- 58 36 11.4 9% 7 29r%a 1I5'ji6 54 65 40 143 - 10% • a 32% 129%, 60 )2 44 17.6 11%- 9 36Ma 1424916 66 79 49 21.3 13% 10 39% 145% • 72 85 54 25.3 141/2 11 . 42% • , 154% • 'Data in this table is subject to manufacturing tolerances. -o a-/ o-c. . m . - 1 1 $pan - Table 1-16 Design Details of Corrugated Steel Pipe-Arches'(3 x 1 in.) Diameter - - ot Pipe Layout Dimensions of Equal Waterway Periphery, Span, Rise, Area, B, R.; R,, Rb, Inches Inches Inches Sq Ft Inches Inches , •Inches • Inches . 36 43 27 6.4 9% 7% 22j 54% 42 50 31 8.7 11% 9 : 26% 67 48 58 36 I1.4 13 10j •• -30% 82 54 65 40 14.3 14% 12 341/2 91% . 60 72 44 17.6 16% - - 13% •3815 98q 66 73 55 22 21 18. 3634 . 76% 72 - 81 59 26 21% 18 40% 923 - 78 87 - 63 31- 22• 18 43j 100j - 84 95 67 35 22% 18 47% 116 90 103 71 40 23 18 51% I32% 96 112 75 46 23% 18 56% 151M - 102 117 79 52 24 18 58% 16014 . 108 128 83 58 24% 18 641 185 114 137 87 64 25 18 69 201 120 142 91 71 25% 18 71% 210 -- "- •Data in this table is subject to manufacturing tolerances. �Inc •.4 USG ' / 8 a o ., oil 1st a ..41IN . 10 -". . I : d ''' r . N'i'. \ 1.: DJ . 1 to li gi.....41,/ y f W i A 7 CL J N 0 I a , CL Z Q �tt ° O \s,j. .4 — Z E �t I hi�� ro ti W Cs 1 1 p i _iH U L o ' ti i t. W �3 ,.. 0 0o t Wiiiii, ,'w v o C a L u) v o L — � J -- o 0 — co a) iill > cu O -- L 1 oppairr fiveamor exam ao TWAT i a miticroAC/PoLtufaN airwar /d VN!/D,L.s I AT ADS. Opt o/SININE, AND D/AltarCTLy °VIM 7ua L411)D8R. sI[A7W &LAM .• 3 Z . 3 w7/oceder /!w ' O.f'mot. !JTD• SAL A: C d • I er+ I-0w v.=J.2.2.8 LAo0ffst 87 ePe CM.INV- *OO.11CAIACITY s1...Acic WA SPY OATH If DowN • wrIta C NA M/ 7V $. PRAmas 41i70.50 ounce,' A/PE 1VATAItT/eKr�— itagmosammmon I.1r.c. 3/8.08 . C a.4N-vuT GATE I' w/MIN. 8 GAUGE5L100. a.amiffswiscra RS87WP JGr "Ar r TYPE H 1, ytr•rri 9 0.the-/cz CATCH BAS/N cur/Av PL7E 1-5 = 3/4.00 FLOW RESTRICTOR / OIL POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE / CATCH BASIN DETENTION a ORIFICE TABLE VOLUME : ovERFL.oW OUTLET r GZ. NlsIAO ofZtiF+c�- c.f e L.E'1/. N L T A u..C.F.Ae( L- o�vt ar rs� ELl�v. B. FT. um cAise 3207 322..8 3'8.08 E8 y. 72 9-v " Y I W \ d�' INGRESS, ESRBRjS ff ILITY EASEMENT? N 88'44'53" W W OPERTY LINE - A� - O --- s 9 PRUNUS SERRUI A'A 'A:MANACANJA' - AMANAGA4JA CHERRY 2" CAL. B&B SPACED AS SHOWN ao so. F — — \ ' SANITARY SEWF.; EMENT E, STING FIRE C'1 `- A.F. # 50,07050 H DRANT _ _e1SO, - - - - - - - 00 1 PINUS NIGRA - AJSTRIAN PINE 6--B' HT B&B SPACED A5 SHOWN I — — — ('YP.) CAR) 1TANDARD STP�.LS (6) GOMPAGT STALLShjht�— C ' T E IV LA,NDSGAPE 3 0 C) A� LANDSGAPE� 10 WATER .-• ET /// JJJ AAA �- I 250 SQ. Fr 7.5 UTILITY Lis a Kr :�� .a,. 62i+, to'x EASEMENT_ 6 LIOUIDAMBE.R STYRACiFL. JA. - SWFE�.7C:;(J 4 2" (,A 3cB SPA.,I ) AS SHOWN 120 SO. FT Q u CD " t o, ° •'" I 2 '� _ ooF �s=�gAc�_ROr STREAP i13 ACER RUBRA 'RED SUNS ' '? P F ?" i_.. B I PACED ASfflD�S�. N }. \ h �� > t /2" C AL STREET TRF-S U 00 01 1 POSED FUTUREOF GIRE 4 LO ATD NTERGE OF • p TYP. 67 I L �� i I�"' u \ 51 MAHONIA AQUIFOLiUM - OREGONGRAPE 5 GAL. 18-24" HT 4' Q.C. = \ 14 THUJA PYRAMIDAL'S 'SMAGARD' EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE 5-6' HT. B&B 3' O.C. r v' c�h- ; 4 F _ ' 6 COTONEASTER PARNE : I - PARNEY COTONEASTER 5 GAL 18 24' HT. 4 C.C. r 1 U 02 .PRUNUS LAUR. O TO Ll YKEN O. Q L.UYK-_N _AUR_l- 2 CA_.. O.C. 9/ 4 {Yyi ��Q M 16 RHOD. PJM COMPACTA - COMPACTTPJM RHOD. 21-24" HT. SPACED AS SHOWN 14 ARROW' - _- WEEPING AlSKA CEDAR 5-6 HT. B&B SPACED AS SHOWN ,r / � CHAMEAC PARTS 0 KAT NSIS 'GREEN RRQ GR� EN ARROW n N i I .e Y i 13 VIBURNUM DAVDI -DAVID VIBURNUM 5 GAL_ 18' f T 4' O.C. s 5 1 - E. __ - ` 0 RI -'OD 'OC AKI-' 0 ANI AKL RHOD 15 18" I' ' EANL AMERI� BEARBERRY COT B&B 4' O.C. r , ( CD AS COTONEASTER n T POTS 18" O.C. FILL ALL PLANT BEDS d III is 26 50. R F D . :f. bnr , Eu .uc i,v �Roi=s >:•' OJ5 �63 so. 6l - r 08 D i PEN N � Linear Application of DeepRoot Tree Root Barriers at Time IfNDSGAPE E �T� Be ~T.�; o C of Installing Concrete Sidewalks and Curbs EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTMon (10) STANDARD 5TA-L-S 00 SQ 136 50. FT ese® RE E /YCY GOMPAGT STALLS ST AR E / \ TYPICAL SECTION OF CURB AND GUTTER WITH DEEPROOT RT TREE ROOT BARRIER INSET INTO CONCRETE. _ _ BARRIER INSTALLED IN A TRENCH IN SUBGRADE WHICH IS THEN COMPACTED. BARRIER IS SE SO THAT TOP EDGE 10 5TORM DRAM / WILL BE 2" 5CM BELOW FINISH GRADE OF CUR AND SET i 14 ,/`, C) EASEMENT / FLUSH WITH EDGE OFLCURB. NBARRIER ORIBS FACETOWARD ,_,;_•� '3 - — —: ?7 _._ — — __ — — __ --- __- -+ — — TREE ROOTS. Top of root border 2" (5cm) below / finish grade of curb 10' WATER EASEMENT A F- u750 070500INSTALLATION SEQUENCE: i � Lr.�V-v �S..v V..v {`Z�; , r W, � � "'c,P�, +.✓ f J 4. 't�" sy,,�. •<u+^ T ?, • T .t..Y I Ij RTY LINE 8 '44'S3"W 20 334 PROPERTY LINE 1. Prepare base and subgrade Concrete D D D---_ I 2 .'reach to pp R is?e death f, ^ssr, la-lon as Dl J root barrier so that to of harrier is 2" (5cm) \ a; � � •� � "-" 1 ® � I below finch grade of top of curb. _ Compacted crushed base 3Pcce roa• bo rer n ire t• �,er-ca4. res m;s' e_ i F_r` face toward tree roots. -- 33O 5=knl' _M ..a cocc to e eme�r- - s W •�-scams•,:-.o ,,�.�.--<�._- ,: Subgrade compaction n I -'' �\ -- ---- '' cce form ma-e.-Ia-aga nst t✓r,er -'noq be Typical DeepRoot UB 24-2, \ n ` nailed from the outside of the form) optional use of UB 18-2 I 326 i I I I TYPICAL SECTION OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK INSTALLATION SEQUENCE: 3Y WITH DEEPR00T TREE ROOT BARRIER INSET INTO \ 24 3a, � CONCRETE 1. Prepare base and subgrade I 2. Trench tc ppropr,ote death for BARRIER INSTALLED IN A TRENCH IN SUBGRADE installation of root barrier so that n ; WHICH IS THEN COMPACTED. BARRIER IS SET L _ A D S ,L A I- E P �.._ A N SO THAT TOP EDGE WILL BE 2" 5CM ABOVE top of barrier is 2" (5cm) below gull ( ) finish grade of top of sidewalk (or i DECIDUOUS TREE Ilh,ni»�• COMPACTED BASE (or halfway between base I PLANT PIT 3 TIMES and finish grade of SW). BARRIER RIBS halfway between top of compacted base FACE TOWARD TREE ROOTS and finish grade of SW) 3 -%cce ro:, barrier it trench, verrcai „upIIII�IIIIIIIIIII I TWICE AT DIAM. . TOP Concrete ribs must face toward tree roots. »A„ 4, Back^I': and :gmpact to requirerents. TWICE AT BOTTOM. ,,,,,gguuu,nlllllll Illllllh &1 STAPNEOTO STAKE lllllllllllll III CK, LOCKE , 5. %cce form moter0i against barrier CONIFEROUS TREE NOTES � I O T E S (It may be nailed from the outside (2) 2x2 FIR STAKES Illlb' (v a ° " of the form} DRIVEN TO REFUSAL 0 dIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III 2x2 FIR TREE STAKE Subgrade compaction / Compacted crushed base. ` SET PLUMB & INLINE > r, Typ. r ° nuIIIII1111111111IIIll lull COMPLY WITH ALI CITY ORDINANCES AND OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS cal DeepRoot UB 24-2. ^^i PLANT PIT 3 TIMES 1 CHAINLOCK, LOCK optional use of UB 16-2 2" LAYER BARK MULCH c ROOTBALL DIAM. AT TOP IMPORTANT NOTE: Tree location must align �w llllplllll IIIIIIIIIIh• &STAPLE TO STAKE INSTALL 6' COMPOSTED TOPSOIL IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. e TWICE Al BOTTOM IIII I INSTALL 3" BARK MULCH IN ALL PLANT BEDS with "as-bam center of bander. 2" DISHED EDGE IIII IIIIIIIIIIIhluuuuu 2" BARK MULCH PULL BACK BURLAP o 2" LAYER BARK nulul PROVIDE ONE YEAR WRITTEN WARRANTY FOR ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR AND REMOVE WIRE W°o v BASKET 2" DISHED EDGE 2" DISHED EDGE INS f ALL AU IOMAPC IRRIGATION AS PER PLAN UNFOLD TOP THIRD T Top m root barrier 2" 50/50 TOPSOIL/ FOLD BACK TOP OF BURLAP &REMOVE NO SUBSTITUTIONS WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND CITY I `5cm) below finish NATIVE SOIL MIX THIRD OF BURLAP WIRE BASKET REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES OR FACILITIES TO OWNERS SATISFACTION grade of curb a ° a „� j i• PLANT PIT 3 TIMES 50/50 TOPSOIL/ ( j ROOTBALL DIAM. AT TOP NATIVE SOIL MIX 50/50 TOPSOIL/ LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES .x NATIVE SOIL MIX » Base TWICE AT BOTTOM TILL PARKING LOT ISLAND SOIL TO 18 DEPTH. �. ', Sidewalk OF TREE STAKING DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL CONIFEROUS TREE STAKING DECIDUOUS -TREE CAEIPFR MEASURED AT 4.5' MINIMUM ABOVE ROOT BALL. ; Subgrode e. % WASHINGTON Curb and Gutter REGISTERED N.T.S. N.T.S.N-r•s CONIFEROUS TREE H MEASURED FROM TOP OF GROUND AT TIME OF PLANTING. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 5/8" (16mm)+ I DeepRoot r 1 2, Typical DeepRoot 6pane UB 212 linear Optional use of . 18-2. REVISED PARKING LOT ISLANDS I UB 18-2 or La ,z-z Minimum 6 panels or 12 linear feet (3.66m). I �B�a 1r72�Zp., DAVID B. LOWMAN CERTIFICATE NO. 387 0 3' WOOD SCREEN FENCE ADDED TO SCREEN PARKING PER CITY REQUEST 0 STREET TREES ADDED PER CITY REQUEST File Name CEDARS RE DESIGN SHELL & CORE Date: 12-g-07 ('( SUgM,e meet Scale: 1 — 20 2 6 2008PROCESS III APPLICATION SUBMITTAL Drawn sy: D.B.L.EA LE D "711, RALWA of 33430 13TH PLACE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Approved By: 750 SE loth STREET NORTH BEND, WA. 9804,' OF �- LDING NGDEPT. Revised:1-23-08,6-16-0$92-08 TEL. 1 (425) 396-0580 FAX (425) 396-0467 BUI vOuu9ld Pug sloaliNmV s3nBL0 uol 6q BOOZ'IudV I45vAd00 00W 7aa4S AVMW8303J'OS 30Vld HM 6£10 3ll3 NOLLVw80dN13119 -dno0 o wilm SIN3ww00 III SMOad 1w 80IO m S1N3Ww00 III SS300ad IV :SN01SIA3a BO 1d3S CZ :31V0 is wd O1/1S 'Aa NMVaO NVId 311S S1N3LN00 6£LO 1070ad of m m (n 0 m =DW r- w r D=rCT/) -< -0 r QO cDi� C) =cn O m �o�(n z z N dbSfdONDLLYLIB01a8H N3 W LLN 3HL 31pNLLN latld NI a0 310HM NI0301gO1W3tl a0035113901 lON 3W BNVdtlUI'l0ALU3dWd 3H13tltl 3al/,tl39 Nftl15E3d01H dO 51N3W0a1SNi Sv'N13d3H 03Ltllpdtl00Nl SN0W30 NNtl SY3813H10XV'1N3W8'.IW SRLL S1N3nmoO 30 39n-38 /��/M IV830 �jo ujo p90019 9 d33 03111w8nS38 m^^ Cr/^) VJ T� TV 311.3 V r ILO-IOZ = II L :31VOS �� 0NVId 311S —I `. � ZI •� � Hl�ION :.(a Pa&oxldv O �1-- 1=4��ANuuuad 3�`doS X (]Z 5 Z (] z 'IV d aus �ti z S'N'Ml3NNaNJ-UIW9 LCVtE=31 Q M't2E.31 60'EEbWItl a] 8w3S A 99'LfC=d01 3 HN tlV11NV5 1 ..L�1 31Vt19 PAN 338 H11M dNO.M WOIUL 3A 1 m NdWJ.9 a, RLE 31 OE'9ZE•31 131,1 H PW dW0.9E>f'VZf=31 MdRJ n6Lt 31 C OZZfE=d01 MOfS=A18 3dWO 9f89 =WIU ® K"o 3NH 338 NLM dWJ.9E 1tl91tl3A 113dA NISVB H31V0 BL'CN801S m 113dAL 3lOHNVW NIWO WHO1S d£ £bZ AA ,.£9,bbo88 N 3NIl Al2J3dMd bcc .00'00Z M.E914b.88N 3NIl U1 GdO2Jd __—__—__—____---------------_—__—__—__—__------------�----—_--_--_-- —__——��—�_—�'-- --__ -- — .'0�....._s .'.'.'.'.'.'.'-'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'-'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. 009OLOLOSL#'j'tl - 4L p x ir'c x I IN3W3Stl3 M31VM IOl ' ' ' '_ ''... '.' 00 02 .'. D 1MOI S.W /n\ NIVMO WMOlS .01 N I p jl �b, �; PA PA PA ._. NIVMO WMOlS d0 NOIlV00l 31VWIXOMddtl cool cr ,cadPn'r coN cr cad cr c Prici caMP cr c&dPAcr ° �. y Od6 MV Silvis 1OVdWOO(1) ld'0S 00 Silvis 3 tlM015 __ tl1S OMV _ 1S �OL) - I l I NZ 0 lj ' S 8£ 3 nd3M -- -- 19 169 S dMZL 6E eZt•31 -. . gI LLL N. u0l IL6 NdWJ.Z6t 92E=WI8 N bl 13dAL NISV8 HOlVO ° __ — I I ,6LL A18L 6 V = b-,ZL Z = L i ('dAll 01 I .. -. _ I LO 80 3 90 � k NouvAP,3 o1 an ado is of ii'rvrt�als 3 �, ZL A I I 99£ZZ M„&VIP.88N 3NI1 J.12J3dO2Jd I -- - - __-------- _ -_ _____----_______ _.___ _. _ b60 -/+.19-14_ZOL4Z__________________IL91LSL________ --�--- _ l 3Nn ua3doad o0 ooz M.E9146.88 N IN3W3Stl3 ALI1LLn 9 SS3M03'SS31:10NI M, II . I 3dW0.%WLtf=31 MdH0.9E BL'LLo-31 9EZ WIH 113dA NISVS InLWJ 1 IHIa I 3dA1 NIStl84MJ1dJ• I -1NVMOAH 11=1 ONIISIX3 OL I LL> W I � I� r 1 C) Im 10 I V ID = I 60 I dw=I, Ir La=31 >'E NIUJ 3 NISVB HO. V I i I ',N3W3SV3 unun ,s,i 1N3W3Stl3 M31vm 101, 1 1NVLIOAH I 3MIj Ol S'3'1,1131 N 10-01N.99 CN-31 LL'LEE=W18 WM 116'v 3WHN"UVJJ tl �) I L 3dN=I5tZ'9Zf=31 I MdWOZL Z>'BZE=31 Lsffe=wro I 13dA1 NISVB HJLVJ 'NOI1VW1:10dNI 31IS 031V13M MOj l ONI1HOIl 311S 311-11 Ol M3j3M'£ '031d11N90 -033'l 39 lltlHS 103l 03SOdO1:Id 09SOdO1:Id 3H11VH1310N Z 'NVld 3118 SIH1 NI ln0 031-Il SI ONIl 03SOdO2:ld d0 NOIIVWMOdNI Ill ION 1VH131ON 'NOIIVWNOjNI 031V13N MOj SONIl IIAIo 31-1101 M3.138' L :S31ON NV-1d 311S 'OLIVONtl1S 1HOIl MIS 03SOdOMd ONV 3NIl M31VM ONnouOH30WINVElaAH 3MIj ONIISIX3 HIIM NOIItl00l 10VX3 31VNIOM000'NMOHS NOIltlo0131VWIXOMddV; 'S1N31114321ml AVM 1VM303j j0 A110 M3d 30N3j Iltll lj E 03SOdOMd 'IH9131-1 IIV'd3AO NI 1d9 M3AO Sill ANV MOj SONIMVM01b21n1onM1S 9 YL 0 M 'djn9 NOS131S 8LL9 Z-0 NI 313UDNOO 03MOIOO XIWOMHO 1319NON0003dViV1SO131j00SH11M iiiEll EI IMIS3O3d 'S1NMU11,n03M 'tl'O v Mad �LIS AVMHltld NVIMIS309d 4 ONIXMVd 11 MOd ONI SONVl33S ZI (Ij 9 x ld b) ONIIVMO3381 NT/M301S (SONIMV8011AIo 33S) S1N3W3MInO3M'tl'0'V 11 '8 AVM IVH303d A0 ,= Mad dWVM NlVM30IS NVIM1S303d m(SONIMb4I0 Ill 33S) ONIISIX3 HIIM NOI1V'8 HoltlW OI 0t M311nO'8 9Mno'NlVM301S 301AOMd Ablll AVM3NM0 03HSIl0W301V Z 00 (SONIMVMO IIAIO 33S) 60 z S1N3W3NinO3M AVM 1tlM303j j0 AID M3d AM1N3 AVM3AIM0 m 'S1N3W3MI1103M NOLLV01jI1M30 '0'33'l 'M3NIV1NOO y ONtl ONINOZ All0 01 83d38HStlMl { 'S1N3W3MIn03M NO11V01411830 '0.3'3.1 LO OW ONINOZ AID 01 M3j3M'H0N39 NVIM1S303d W31SAS IIVMOMtll19'11W 031VOO M30MOd (WS dO d013AOSV) .Zb /M IIVM 9NINIVl3M 313M0N00 'd'f0 (1A3WMOjSNVM1 MOj NOIMO-I 03WOSStl) 9U SIN3W3MIn03M A111I1n /M 31tlNI0800o'30VMO NO 9V1S 313MONOo'd'P0 IIVM ONIO11n91N30VCOV j0 S1N3W313 031M1311 /M 31VN10M000 ITVM 0NINItl13M / IIVMOMtlno 3131:10NOo'd'1'o V'0'V Mad 03MIn03M SV I301S HOV3 @ W31SAS '11VMONVH'-IIW 031VOO M30MOd /M SMIVIS 31380NOo "d'I'o EO 'S1N3W3MInO3M'03.3'101 M3j3M'>I3V83>110 ll 031VOO M30MOd ZO VGV Mad 0.03M sv M3dvl'8 98no Ol 11tlHdSV 3dO18 LO :S310N 30N3N333N NVId MIS 3NIl NIVMO M31tlMWMOIS ONIISIX3 314I1 M31VM ONIISIX3 31,1I1 M3M3S ANYI NVS ONIlSIX3 a NIVMO j008 OAd.V ® OUVONVIS 11-10I1 MIS 03SOdOMd HAWMOASNVHI OMVONVIS114011133M1S O3SOdOMd 9—CD 03AOW3M 39 01- 310d 1HOIl NISVB HOIVo ER 83SIM 3NOHd3131 I1nvA M3MOd dQ 1NVM0A14 318Ij NOI1tlOtlMMI M31VM H 310HNVIN NItlMO 1114l O 8313W N31VM 3lOHNVW AMVIINVS O 3A1VA M31VM NOIIVWMOjNI 031tl13M MOj ON11NV1lnSNOo ON1M33NION3'W'S'3 A9 Iamns 311S Ol M3j3M :s-loe"As unlln (£ L# 310N 30N3M3j3M M3d 17 801001VOM31N1 H11M 313MON00 03dWtlIS) AtlMXIVM NVIM1S903d 03AVd 03SOdO8d ('NOI1tlWMOdNI 031V13M MOA SONIMM80 3dVOSONtlI 33S) SV3MV 03dVOSONVI O3SOdOMd (NOIIVWMO-AM 031tl13M MOj SONIMVMO IIAlo 33S) 3SIMM3H10 031ON SS3lNn'(Shc ONV SMIVIS •3'1) SIN31104313 031V13M 8 NT/M301S 313MON00.403SOdO1:fd Noll V ONINMtld 31011-13A MOj IIVHdSV HIM SV3MV 03SOdOMd (-NOI1tlWMOANI (13.L 13M MOd SONIM"G i"nlo311HONtl 33S) 1NIMd100.1 ON10lIn9 03SOd%Id :4N3931 NV-1d 31lS 3S OEb' L : V3aV 03dVOSONVI l0l 2iOR131N1 �L JS Z99'9: V38V 03dVOSONVI U313WR13d 3S Z66'L : V3ilV 03dVOSONVI 1V101 S`d32:]V (13d` 0SGNV1 z 3S 8L9'Lb : V3NV MIS WiOl b32Jb 311 S < V0V E SdW I,W'IZ 31 (%BEZ)-LOVdWOObl. N dW= 98'LZE=31 3dM OZL`oms Rf 31 ONVONVIS 4b : 0301AONd S11V1S 1V101 It NISVBHO1V0 1,9 : 03min03M SllV1S W101 OOE/L : IIVAN/301330 08 - 03NOZ Morda3w aol L8'LEf 31 MO,da3AOSL91'BEf+31 I 1N(lOO �l�d1S 0N1>QJdd MdWOA t0'BZfy31 NdWObf 88'BZf=31 3N dWJSI t88Z631 113dAL NI °°°�;Wd; VA : 3dA1 NOI10f)alSN00 1 I JS88Z18L :IV101 3S EbL 9 : N0013 GNIHl 3S 611, V9 : N0013 ON003S 3S 9Z0'9 : 2100131SNU N01iV J03N1 JNlaline =0•,4E = 30VHE) 39VH3AV 3A09V 114913114 9NI0lUl9 4EE = 4 / 9EE L = 8ZE + 9ZE + 04E + oK :Nouvi )O1Vo 111013111 30V80 39VH3AV NOiiwi o-ivo 1H913H ONimina A PORTION OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 17, TWP. 21 N., RGE. 4 E., W.M. F-1_, I yy III � �•�1 I Lip LOB' 4 0 ' I768190-0045 00 _ is SCALE: 1" = 20' CONTOUR INTERVAL 2' w If _ __— _ AP'PROMMATE LoCATI©N OF BASIS OF VERTICAL DATUM: iN 86'44'5,3" W 200.00, STREAM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 4` NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 (NM29) .- BENCH MARK: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY B M NO. 2f �3 _ I - Q 6 5- 1 LOCATION: RAM -SET NAIL ON EASTs I NE I ; • `,,' = :' �� - PEDESTAL PAD AT NORTHWEST CORNEERR OFO SOUTLHP336TH • wrw ,�5 ' _ -1 -' MAND PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH. 24' TRIP OF MONUMENT EI..EV_ - .346.811. 100' STREAM BUFFER t E^ 1 tf"- ITAR'F SEVMER FJ�SEMENT I 1 `} A.F. 70 , TPY -- �750�iT3 500 � 1 O' WATER r - - _.,.. �: _ , __ ,— —_ _ .. r/ p _ EASEMENTr�� — _ y - r .`.+.. /`.`.',-"r• lax' ,•.. y,x.. 0` , ��:'—;t, '. ' LEGEND M —WATER IN . aui LLJ A w � s W ,_ Y t - LL-..... - f PROPOSEDj WATER METER C) a ; ; ': 18,51 Q S. F, i»- WATER SEND w/ CONC. BLOCKING I (l. 0 i 3 - STORY WATER CAP MJv, l OFFtCE BUILDING GATE VALVE h `o � x i } r a YI S-JLU.VV 2EI=340.00 UUUUr•� � ��_ 4 SANITAR Y SEWER CLEAN OUT l u5 3RD=352.00 1;CL ��` Ii ~3z.. ' ~-� -- 25.'' i` s. ` CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 y II.� p 7681 0 -C3fl45 ' < CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 y Fy .i Y O SANITARY SEWER MAIN r" r ,ry r-�/� al �' EWE: SEMENIT� mow/Vi� l Ll__Jg) PARK, ! :_ ,....., r - i —•-- EXISTING WATER -_ s Y ` I� t bi/ �i}. �� t LOT 1 - EXISTING SEWER —001 a 7680 (}02f1''I „m•n EXISTING STORM Y ' - EXISTING POWER r I c tl. , bk 5' LANMAP'E BUFFER ; r-. i• I ' 22't 22'±- I x 32' EXISTING R,Q,`I1 - ----• .......................... V R.O.W, DEDICATION; � f `I O' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT 4. _ S' LANDSCAPE 1304f2 I �sj C I � f I� r � . T IAId€ SSE BUF 7. v J^i • 0 4 i �,F� _�.. to . y.y y ► � y yy , 76.7% IMPERVIOUS AREA PERVIOUS AREA = 8,539 SF IMPERVIOUS AREA = 35,079 SF TOTAL AREA - 43,618 SF COMPACT STALLS TOTAL STALLS = 63 COMPACT STALLS - 21 (33.3%) HANDICAP STALLS= 3 FULL SIZE - 39 CALL 48 is O BEFORE • 1-800-424-5555 4 p I� 0 I:.OH*U LTINQ ENQjME. F�Rb CLC ,VFJI51st Wft SO(Ah 420010 I+ I w I Fodural Way, WA 98003 ..1 wa sa,u wti�w,esmciwil.corn Ym�nPe �.��^ yA GL. Ca41 Emliroarr9 tud Z..Ykv lanA. Ptamrt„® ��. "- -= PERMIT NO. 05-103647—EN CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ul RES�B U APPROVAL GATE D SEP 2 6 2008 cc C SIGNATURE sCL ' 5 i REUSE OF DOCUMENTS s.t ta)y,.r v, Hq ac rw uc 6�+'aasiY�NdwgS�rl sara�a+vaYas,-�.w, we tikrW6rtwlrp�Jou'm�ier #Ik lk[4 ek q�p[LU cW'AYYRI OA w f+Al YRYrJII I!R'•wP.{u rxxarnt�.rcxnrsr. w z CL ui v Q � L) 12 Ln LLJ > u- z a gcn f i 1 •� 5 f � �Q W ©z U) S cp ui Q C!) _I=Q J W c CJCI3� uJ LLJ f� Lu IL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT Em 55 L. F.- -- T-T TALL RETAINING WALL TO BE DESIGNED BY --- � OTHERS- 0 is gib- ':c cx 2t-13' TAL 4 RETAiNIIJG WALL TO BE DESIGNED BY C3THERS..,�' 4 U 2.24 Vk fr r= BEGIN CURB i iTRANSIION j A PORTION OF THE. SE 1/4 OF SECTION 17, TWP. 21 N., RGE. 4 E., W.M. y V FFICE BUILDING ` 18,510 ..F. �5 CIF=328.D0 NG�IN CURB 2ND=340.00 IANSITION 3hp=352,00" !` 'ID CURB IANSITIDN ALFLUSH CURB IN THIS AREA NO CURB .9 0i R ING i PAVEMQjl - Ao_1'% ti -- r sc � Y 5 } A� f 60 x --. _ B`5D => 1 ! 4-4�44 1 �' .,.iTW—tYi — 4I •'.:':: t-'[YE'�"M'Sii". IAA 'kk i;•. 5�� 27 L,F. y --a 2' TALL A RE:fANING ""------•._�,_,_ ` -WALL TO BE r a ---=DESIGNED BY__� . f OTHEiRS _ - -- o) fib L,F 2`-3- TALL DETAINING WALL TO BE - ` DESIGNED BY OTHERS t� f-� 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE.1" 20" CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2' BASIS OF VERTICAL DATUM_ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 (NGVD29) BENCH MARK: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY B.M. NO. 2168--5-1 LOCATION: RAM -SET NAIL ON EAST EDGE OF TELEPHONE PEDESTAL PAD AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH 336TH AND PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH, TOP OF MONUMENT ELEV. = 346.811. IVOi E. 1 ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG CURB ARE TAKEN FROM BOTTOM OF CURB, 2. SEE SHEET OM-1 FOR DEMOLISHION PLAN, 3. SEE SHEET DT-1 FOR DETAILS AND NOTES. APPROXIMATE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES CUT = 2,870 cu yds, FILL = 3,048 cu yds. TOTAL = 177 cu yds. FILL, EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. QUANTITIES ARE "NEAT LI1IC ONLY, THE QUANTITIES DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR ANY SHRINK OR SWELL FACTORS. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO CALCULATE THE EARTHWORM VOLUMES FOR BID PURPOSES. mQ2bI2!JJ lJUQ CN{tI11€959 LLj: 5"16 to way SmAh 020D I �' I ♦� I ior I FeJorgt Way, WA go= �,wr1 Wr.e! www."rt5Givll-Com lone Sw.�,wty id�0 PgrN.q »a ( "+oJ.st YmpYv..n 4»d>1mM !✓diNea4ut PERMIT NO. 05-103647—E.N CITY OF FEDERAL WAY RESUBMITTE APPROVAL DATE SEP 2 6 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL b SIGNATURE BUILDING DEPT, •I RE-IISE OF DOCUMENTS d9i-e.{ �iQiltAil&1 N wRY ilf XNRM{MYSif IYI�RW [Wy Sfl F•Cf. Igf"!i'a Pl✓OiAiIY�YaIPNL��Y7r 1J11r1f3L2*CipIIRnIC59RM.tli BiYVY/{SMIitYS rKwarmi IAintl�lrCM4r1:M w' z 0.. 06 L) W C cr_ N Lu CIA r� l+d z OC ao z z n 0ui o z a0U)= W 0< Lj�� A In W U3 w V c�Ppnc ptaW R.h08E GR-1 HYDRANT 10' WATER _ASEl�T -1.5UTILITY (5? INGRESS, EGR@�5 L UTY EA5EMEN9 N 88'44'53" W 30, OPERTY LINE l� o 8i SQ. FT (TYP.) (T P.) /d1 S-ANDARD STALLS (0) COMPACT STA--S / E IV LANDSGAPE 120 SO. FT RCPO5ED FUTURE L TION OF OR✓ASE__ -d{ NTE2GEPT0R�11 I— II '11 ? I \ u 54. FT I I o6 �N LAN05CAPE fLl nNG FIRE HYDRANT -cno n gyp) STANC.ARD STALLS4 , os r..� ...._.<- IL 14 --f4P QPERTY LINE - —�� D-- Vf'L. P JS FG j l< 5'CI`F l4 I R �.h�N` •'F c 32, 0 FT 'YPE V V'VNDSCAPE 34 O -200 50. FT N� n _ 01 u i� 0 07 50. '3 TYr, . o z 0 N SQ.� 61 __ TYPE IV L�rCAPE 0 100 SO. F R E 133 50XFT--\ (%! COMPACT STALLS ST E AR � \\ N88'44'53"W 200.00' D— 0 : PIPE SIZING PIPES TO BE SIZED ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING TABLE: 0-10 GPM = 3/4" PIPE 11-18 GPM = 1" PIPE 19-25 GPM = 1 1/4" PIPE 26-34 GPM = 1 1/2" PIPE 36-55 GPM = 2" PIPE ALL PIPE SIZING IS BASED ON CL200 PVC PIPE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE PIPE SIZES PER THE ABOVE CHART. SAVITAR" SEW'E�,EASCMENT AF. 1#75C70705^✓ Z 100 FT ZTEACK FROM 5TREA '.. \ 4 � 1Y - J � l � S —.._- O I C � \ I — — 10 5TORM DRAN \ \\\ — — — EASEMENT 10' WATER EASEMENT. A.F. #750 070500 334 D PROPERTY LINE 330 _� n 326 II I IRRIGATION PLAN POP—L NOTES DESIGN BASED ON 20 GPM @ 60 PSI MIN. IF LESS FOUND, CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE INSTALLATION. PROVIDE ALL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS. PROVIDE ONE YEAR WRITTEN WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. NO SUBSTITUTIONS. PLAN IS DIAGRAMATIC AND ACTUAL FIELD LAYOUT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION MANUALS TO OWNER AT FINAL WALK THRU. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE TIME OF OPERATION CALCULATIONS FOR MAY THRU OCTOBER TO PROVIDE A MAXIMUM OF 1" PER WEEK TOTAL PRECIPITATION FROM COMBINED WEATHER AND IRRIGATION. INSTALL RAIN SENSOR IN SECURE BUILDING LOCATION TO SHUT OFF IRRIGATION DURING WET PERIODS. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND ADJUST CONTROLLER TIMING TO REFLECT CLIMATIC AND WEATHER CHANGES AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH DURING FIRST SEASON OF OPERATION TO INSURE OVERWATERING OR UNDERWATERING IS NOT OCCURRING AND THAT NO OVERSPRAY ON PAVING OCCURS. ALL PIPE OR WIRE UNDER PAVING SHALL BE IN SCH40 PVC SLEEVE AT LEAST 18" DEEP AND TWICE DIAM. OF INSERT PIPE. MEET ALL CODES PERTAINING TO ALL ASPECTS OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ANY DAMAGE TO FACILITIES OF UTILITIES WILL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO OWNERS SATISFACTION. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND FEATURES BEFORE TRENCHING. THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMATIC AND DOES NOT REFLECT WHERE ACTUAL PIPING WILL BE INSTALLED. ACTUAL LAYOUT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLER AS IS THE REQUIREMENT OF OBTAING 100% COVERAGE. IRRIGATION LEGEND RAINBIRD 1800 SERIES POP—UP ON SWING PIPE RISER PER DETAIL RAINBIRD 100—PEB CONTROL VALVE IN STD. BOX PER DETAIL RAINBIRD ESP-12LX+ CONTROLLER WALL MOUNT POWER BY ELECTRICIAN RAINBIRD 33LVC QUICK COUPLER AND 33K & SH-0 SWIVEL PER DETAIL 1" FEBCO 850 DCV IN JUMBO BOX PER DETAIL 1" CRANE GATE VALVE IN 10" PIT AS IRRIGATION P.O.C. 1" IRRIGATION METER BY UTILITIES CONTRACTOR 1 1/2" SCH40 PVC MAIN AT 18" DEPTH MIN. CL200 PVC LATERALS AT 12" DEPTH MIN. SIZED PER CHART C'""SH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH -UP SPRAY OR ROTOR SPRINKLER: RLEX STREET ELL IG PIPE RISER ASSEMBLY: kRB ELLS ANS 12" SWING PIPE LATERAL PIPE ' PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL P SPRAY OR ROTOR SPRINKLER DETAIL MIN. 10" MIN. 6' ;;;'�----�I--- DRAIN ROCK+ i —JUMBO BOX —DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY FLUSH W/ FINISH GRADE —GALV. 3" NIPL. (1 OF 2) —GALV. UNION (1 OF 2) —GALV. 90 ELL (1 OF 4) —GALV. PIPE (TYPICAL) —PVC MALE ADAPTER —IRRIGATION MAINLINE PIPE BA FGALV. NIPL. TO SHUTOFF VALVE OR P.O.C. KFILOW PREVENTER DETAIL ENGTH OF WIRE, COILED )OF CONNECTION WITH COVER: SIZE DE/TOP OF MULCH INTROL VALVE: '0 NIPPLE (3") 0 ELL 0 NIPPLE AS REQUIRED) 0 MALE ADAPTER 0 TEE OR ELL NE PIPE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE DETAIL NOTE: PROVIDE QUICK FINISH GRADE TOP OF MULCH COUPLER KEY & / HOSE SWIVEL FIT QUICK COUPLERR QUICK -COUPLING VALVE: 2„ 10" VALVE PIT ALV. 3" NIPL. 3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL r r GALV. STREET ELL CONC. BRICK GALV. 12" NIPL. GALV. STREET ELL PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL U \ \ PVC MAINLINE PIPE GALV. ELL #4 REBAR W/ S.S. PIPE CLAMPS QUICK —COUPLING VALVE r STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT -58/-C� MW DAVID B. LOWMAN CERTIFICATE NO. 387 File Name Date: 12 -8-07 Sheet CEDARS RE -DESIGN SHELL COR Scale: 1 _ 20 (ISE 2 6 2ppg I R-1 PROCESS III APPLICATION SUBMITTAL Drawn By: D.B.L. EAGUI D E S I G DF,, INGpALWAY of 33430 13TH PLACE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Approved By: yam_ , 750 SE loth STREET NORTH BEND, WA. 98045 DEPT. Revised:1-23-086-16-089 22-08 TEL. (425) 396-0580 FAX (425) 396-0467 1 =I= x I o I I I I I I I 0 I ; � II I� I I I --------------------------- pi I' i - - -- - --- --- - -- - - - - -- � - I --------------------------- - - WH1 AHj I I i q Pm =•... PROPOSEDr�'. f2F : I I LOCATION OF G`"::48F'. WTERC FF PROPOSED 3-STORY BUILDING IIINS lid T o Sti I ' I a jql it I � II H1 BAH 1 I 1 WH1 iI I, II I I � >:EPusE STORAGE -.. ❑ I I AREA PI ' - - - - - - -- - -- -- -- -- - 9H1 334 N ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SCALE : 1 " = 20'-0" MHTWO FUXTURE SCHEDULE AH1 LITHONIA LIGHTING HEAD:AS1-150M-SR4SC-XV-SPA-HS P L: S - 3-4 (1) 150W PSMH ---V 180W 15' HID LIGHT POLE FIXTURE - TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION P1 HEAD: GE # MDCA-I0-S-8-M-1-1-F-MC3-2 (1) 1On HPS 240V 129W PROVIDE WITH 5'-9"' DAVIT ARM AND 30' POLE PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARDS. GENERAL NOTES 1. DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO MINIMAL PERMIT LEVEL ONLY. FURTHER COMPLETION OF DESIGN DOCUMENTS IS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION SET. 2. EXTERIOR LIGHTING TO COME ON AT DUSK BY PHOTOCELL AND OFF BY PHOTOCELL OR TIMECLOCK. PROVIDE OVERRIDE SWITCH. 3.FOR ALL OCCUPANCY SENSORS AND TIME CLOCK CONTROLS, ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE TESTING AND COMMISSIONING DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS PER PARAGRAPH 1513.7 OF WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE. A COMPLETE REPORT OF TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS SHALL BE PREPARED AND FILED WITH THE OWNER. 4. COORDINATE ALL BUILDING LIGHTS EXACT LOCATION AND MOUNTING HEIGHTS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION DRAWINGS. HANDHOLE CAULK ALL AROUND POLE -SEE SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET. 2" 45 'CHAMFER 1" DIA. CONDUIT LA Frt �- I BUSHING II 1 1 II ►. II •1 I II _ Ir 7 r FINISHED Ir •II GRADE 11 - CURB I II N ►: - .II . rh—, LIGHTING CONDUIT 3/4DR. ANCHOR .I•II - �L ►` I T �� o a0 BOLTS (TYP. OF 4) I-Ib��IF-J 4 TIE BAR AROUND BOLTS II II ,I TYP. 3 PLACES) II (4) 4 REBAR EQUALLY IL . SPA ED WITH 3" MINIMUM L►� COVER & #3 RING TIES 24" MA -_J AT 8" ON CENTER. Imo— POLE BASE DETAIL AH 1 NOT TO SCALE II �W�o w0Oz O 0 U�� W oZ$ d �J�_j W C, Q = � W �Cnmw W " �i1 �J aanwle ELEGTRIGAL SRE P� PERMIT SET GO bee engineers, inc. : (253) 922-0896 6021 12th street east, suite 200, tacoma, we 98424 SEP 2 6 200� CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. LVVU CITY OF FEDERAL WAy BUILDING DEPT. mim A DXF file created by LitePro 2,025 on 9/25/2008 2109:30 PM CALCULATION SUMMARY AREA NAME DIMENSIONS I GRID / TYPE # PTS SPAC GROUP AVE MAX MIN MAX/MIN AVE/MIN SITE 3,0 315.40x333,50Ft TO PROP / H-H 558 5,00 (+> 0,03 0,32 0,00 276,61 27,47 OF ►4 M X� Z Who W 0 oz Cl' Q _ UjCC 06a �J-r< c W J O� Q = - W 0 LLJ W 11-11- Al �J now am SITE LIGHTING PLAN POINT BY POINT C4 G. PERMIT SET GO bce engineers, inc. ( p:(253) 922-0446 f: (253) 922-0896 6021 12th street east, suite 200, taGgcga, WAgd422q SEP 2 6 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. 4 4 + + T 4 + + + + + + + DID 0.00 00 0.00 aoo 0.00 0.0 aoo ono 000 no0 DO 0.00 0.00 + + + + + ♦ + + 4 + + + 4 4 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 aoo 0.00 0.0 OLD 0.00 0.00 0.00 no 0.00 0 i + 4 + T + + + + 4 + + T + o.00 0.00 00 0.00 aoo 0.00 0.0 0.00 goo 0.00 0.00 OD 0.00 .00 + + + + + + + T + + + + + 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .o0 0.00 0. + 4 + 4 + + + + + + + + + 4 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 0.00 Ono 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .00 0n0 0.00 Ho 0.00 00 D.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 OLD 0.00 .0 DID 0.00 + + 4 + + 4 + + + + + 4 4 O.Do o.00 .00 o.00 aoo o.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .00 0.0 4 4 + + + + + + } t + 4 + + 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 aoo 0.00 O.o 0.00 0.00 D.ao 0.00 .00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 00 0.00 a00 0.00 0.0 0.00 aoo 0.00 4 + do ono 4 + + 4 4 T + + 4 4 aoo 0.00 .00 0.00 aoo 0.00 0.0 0.00 OLD 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 aoo 0.00 0.o OLD ono 0.0o 0.00 Q00 00 0.00 ROO 0.00 O.0 0.00 0.00 OLD 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 aoo 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 OLD 0.00 4 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 o0o 0.o do 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 OLD OLD 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 aoo 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 O.Ot 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.0o Oo OLD 0.01 0.01 � + + + + + + + + 4 4 ROO 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 aoo 0.0D 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 aoo 0.00 00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.0 0.01 001 0.01 OLD 0.00 00 0.00 aoo 0.00 0.0 0.01 001 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 aoo 0.00 0.0 oh 001 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 ROO 0.00 0.0 0.01 001 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 ROO 0.00 0.0 0.01 001 0.01 aoo 0.00 .00 0.00 ROO 0.00 0.0 001 001 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 OLD 000 0.00 0.0 OX 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 OLD O.0 OLD O.OI 001 0.00 0.00 00 OLD O.00 0.01 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 ROO 0.01 0.0 0.01 001 0.01 + + + ; + + T { + + 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 OLD ona On 0.ol 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 a0o 0.01 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 aoo 0.01 0.0 0.01 001 0.01 a00 aoo 00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 + + + + + + T + + + 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 0.00 0.01. 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 OLD 0.0 0.01 0.01 001 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.01 001 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.01 a 0 O.ol 0.01 0.01 4 f + + + + + + + + 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 0.00 too O.o 0.01 0.01 0.01 + + + 4 + 4 + + + 4 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 aoo aoo 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 aoo 0.00 0.0 0.01 001 0.01 + + + + 4 + + + + + 0.00 000 00 0.00 Ono 0.01 0.0 0.01 0.01 001 aoo aoo 00 0.00 aoo 0.01 0.0 0.01 0.01 001 + + + + 4 4 + + i + 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 OLD onl on 0.01 0.01 001 0.00 OLD 00 0.00 aoo 0.01 Do 0.01 001 001 4 } + + 4 4 4 + + + 0.00 aoo .00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 + 4 4 + + 4 4 + + } 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 ROO 0.00 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 4 + + 4 i 4 4 + + ; OLD 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 O.OI 0.01 0.01 a00 0,0D 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.01 001 0.01 ❑ 0.00 aoo 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.01 001 0.01 Ul O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 001 a01 001 _ + + 4 + + + + T + + 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 00 aoo aoo 0.00 O.o 0.00 0.00 0.00 T + 4 + + + + T + + 0.00 0.00 0o ono 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 00 aoo 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 OLD 0.00 o0 0.Um 00 a00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 + T 4 + T + + + + + + T + 4 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 ROO 0.00 0.0 0.00 UO 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 0.00 + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + 000 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Do 0.00 0.00 + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + 4 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 Goo 0.00 0o 0.00 0.00 + + + + ♦ + + + + + + + + + 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 0.00 + + + + + + + + + T + + + + 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ao 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ono + + + + + + + 4 + + + T i 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 OLD 00 0.00 0.0 to D.00 0. 0.00 0.00 Doo 0.00 a00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 000 Goo O00 000 000 000 0.00 000 000 000 000 000 0.00 000 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 D00 OLD 000 0.00 000 000 000 000 10 + 0.00 0. + + + + i + + 0.00 i ono + 0.00 ; 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + ODD + 0.00 + 0.00 + o00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.08 1 0.00 T 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 + 000 T 0.00 + o.DO 4 0.00 + 0.00 + 00o + 0.00 4 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + ROD + 0.00 + O.Oo + 0,00 + 0.00 4 000 + 0.00 I + + + + +4 + + + + + + + 4 + + 4 + + + + + + 4 4 + + ♦ 4 + } 4 + + i + + + + + + h + 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0o 0.00 o.Do 0.00 0.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.0o a.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 oao o.00 o.00 o.00 a.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 1 + + ♦ + + 4 + + + + + + + + ♦ + + + + + + + T + + + + + + + + + + ; + + + + + ♦ ; + + 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L 0.00 0.00.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ono 0.00 0.D0 0.00 0.00 0.00 .00 0. 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.DO 0.00 0.00 ODO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 + { + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + T + + + ♦ + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 + ROD + 0.00 + 0.00 0b + 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 4 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 4 0.00 + 0.00 ♦ 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 ; 0.00 10 0 0.00 ono 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .00 o. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4o 0oo 0.00 0.00 00 00 00 O00 a00 000 OLD 0.+ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 000 000 0.00 O.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 OOo 000 O.OG 000 000 0.00 000 0.00 { T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 + + i + } + + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + O.DO 4 0,00 + OLD + OLD + o00 } 0.00 + 0.00 4 000 h 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.og 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ODD 0.00 0.00 0.a0 0.00 000 0.00 O.O0 o.00 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 00 ODD 900 0.00 @ 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.0o 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 000 aoo 000 aoo 0.00 000 000 000 0.00 000 OLD 0.00 OLD 000 Ong 0,00 000 0.00 0.00 000 000 000 Ho 000 0.00 o.oa o00 000 000 Ono 00 0.00 AH 0.00 O00 000 ODD 000 000 0.00 0.01 000 000 0.00 000 000 000 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 - 0.01 0.01 0.00 000 OOo 000 0,00 0.01 0.01 6.00 0,00 000 000 000 0...1 0.01 0.01 0.00 000 000 000 0.01 0.01 001 o.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.01 0.01 001 0.01 000 0.00 o.og + 0.01 + 0.01 + 001 + 0.01 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 001 + 0.01 + 0.00 T 0.00 + 000 WH1 0.01 0.01 001 0.01 000 a00 0.00 - - AH F ° 0.01 O.ol 0,01 000 O00 a00 0.013 0 + DOI + Onl + 0.01 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + + + + + + 0.01 DAI 0.01 0.01 0.00 ono 0.00 + 0.01 T 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 0.01 a+1 0.01 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.01 001 At 000 0.00 DID 0.00 D.01 0.01 0.01 000 0.00 000 000 0.01 0.01 000 000 0.00 000 0.00 - f o.01 0.01 000 a00 ODD 000 0.00 • 4 0.01 + Rol + ODD + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 • 0.01 0.01 0.01 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.01 0.01 o.al 000 o.oa o00 0.00 0 0.ol 0.01 0.01 000 0.00 000 000 ° O.ol o.ol 0.01 000 0.00 0.0o 000 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 ° + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.00 4 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 ° AH 0.01 0.01 0.01 000 0.00 Ono a00 ► °'' + + + + + + + 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1' T D.01 + 0.01 ♦ 0.01 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 0.00 0.01 nol 0.01 0.00 0.00 Ono 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 000 0.00 0.00 000 o.ol D.ol ODD 000 ODD OR 0.00 001 0.00 0.00 ono 0.00 000 000 o.g1 D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 ♦ 0.01 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 } 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 + 0.00 + ono + 0.00 4 0.00 000 + 0.00 0.00 0.00 OR 000 0.00 O00 000 0.00 0.0o Ong 000 Ono 000 OLD 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 000 AH1 AHI 0.00 0.00 0.00 o00 0.00 000 goo T + 000 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 �b 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 o00 0.00 o.oa OLD 000 aoo O.00 000 0.F T .01 + 0.01 + O01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0,01 + 0.01 T 0.01 T 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + Dal i aOl + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 ♦ 0.01 + On[ + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 001 + Onl + O.ol + 0.01 + O.gl + 0.00 + 0.00 + ROD + 0.00 + 000 T O.Oa + 0.00 + O00 + 000 + OLD + 0.00 + o.00 + OLD + 000 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + .00 + 0.00 + 001 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 4 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 T 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.00 ♦ 000 + 0.00 + ono + 0.00 + ono + 0.01 + 0.01 T 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.0o + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 + 0.00 + 0.00 + "a ♦ ono + D.OD + OA0 + 0.00 + 0.00 4 .00 + 0.00 4 0,00 + 0.00 + Ono + 0.01 + 0.01 + 000 + 0.01 T 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.00 ♦ 000 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + ono + 0.00 + ono + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 + 0.00 + O.Oa + O.OD + 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 ♦ 0,00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + O.00 + O.00 + 0.00 + 000 + 0.00 + ono + O.DO + O00 + 0.00 + DOG + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + .00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 ♦ 0.00 + 0.00 4 OLD + 0.00 + OLD + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 4 0.00 + 000 + 0.00 + 0.06 + o00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0,00 + 0.00 + 000 + Ono + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + Ono + 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 4 .00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + OLD + OLD + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 4 0.00 + 0.00 4 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + ono + 0.90 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + O00 + 0.00 + Ono + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + Goo + Ono + Ono + 0.00 ♦ 000 4 0.00 + Ong ♦ 0.00 + 000 T 0.00 + ODD + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 4 0o + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + ono + 0.00 + ono + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + OR + 0.00 + OLD + 0.00 + 0,00 + 0.00 + Ono + 0.00 4 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 4 0.00 + 0.ao + 0.90 ♦ 0.00 + 0.00 + ono + 0.00 I 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 000 4 0.00 + ODD ♦ 0.00 + 0.00 4 0.00 + 0.00 ♦ 0.00 + 0.00 + OLD N SITE LIGHTING PLAN POINT BY POINT CALC. SCALE : 1 " = 20'-0" DXF file created by LitePro 2,025 on 9/25/2008 2:09:30 PM A� 3]686 iSTERF� NA1. ;G� CALCULATION SUMMARY AREA NAME DIMENSIONS IGRID / TYPE # PTS SPAC GROUP AVE MAX MIN MAX/MIN AVE/MIN SITE 3.0 315,40x333,50Ft 15' OUT / H-H 1783 5.00 W 0.00 0.01 0.00 N/A N/A (Dw1=o � W O oz C WLLJ = wv"3 d /) L.L w o Q Z W 0CnMW m 0 W �, �J m I m Ib�l.' 077f 517E LIIGHT)NG P POINT BY POINTG G. PERMIT SET O AWLr bce engineers, inc. p:(253) 922-0446 f� f: (253) 922-0896 6021 12th street east, suite 200, tacoma, wa 98424 RESUBMITTED SEP 2 6 20OR AbM b8303 JO Al10 800Z 9 Z Nnr a3"inenS3a '4 v E C A O Z O Li OO z B a U0D a 2Ou. 0 5UU I H LLLVA I IUN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-O" 0 (L�?t_j 0 T�� W — T��z IlJZ uj Lu _ Lu Q 0m Q aa° o tlILujo aILL LL wI v M Q L IL L TOP OF PARAPET - - - Y@367.00' ._.� L 4 THIRD FLOOR............................. �._._ SECOND FLOOR _ . _ J� I ' }} II -_ .._____--___. .I ___-__ ��_-- ___ Lr I'� -_ J _._._i. .__ ......--__ ._....._- ---_— -'r_ o �I 8" C.I.P. PER STRUCTURAL URETAIN'G URA WALL N s 1 � 1 � i 1 544 1 FT'G PER STRUCTURAL (ALIGN 3 4 14 6 3 4 © ❑3 4 6 3 4 6 3 4 6 3 WALL W/ RELATED ELEMENTS OF BUILD'G WALL) 0 2 5 10 20 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-O" MATERIAL KEY j] PAINTED CONC. TILT PANEL �2 PRE -FINISHED METAL CLADDING SYSTEM �3 VENEER CULTURED STONE SYSTEM ® ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM. KAWNEER OR EQ. Q5 ALUMINUM WINDOW SYSTEM. KAWNEER OR EQ. © PAINTED STEEL CANOPY ❑7 HVAC EXHAUST CAP ® PAINTED PVC DOWNSPOUTS. PAINT TO MATCH J BACKGROUND. Q Q PRE -FINISHED CAP OVER DECORATIVE CORNICE 10 REVEAL IN CONC. TILT PANEL, TYPICAL 11 SCUPPER M W 12 'COW -TONGUE' OVERFLOW 13 RETAINING WALL v ) 14 MECHANICAL LOUVER W 15 APPROXIMATE LINE OF EXISTING GRADE A _0 I` U_ J v'/^) � VJ W U RESUBMITTED JUN 2 6 2008 RE -USE OF DOCUMENTS MISDOCUMENT.ANDTHE 0Fly.0 DESIGNSINCaflipUTEDHEREJN AS INETRUMENTSOFPROFESSION SEWU. ARE THE PROPERTY OF JW PNO MF NOT TO BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN WHOLE E OR IN PRAT WITHOUT THE VJRITIEN R THOMIATON OF JCAP. oF- v'o it W LLJ 4� c� z y U U 0 W u- O z `- co OQ N CD/ m U) W M = N W co E� z C N.H C5 o N N I— N OO N � L z z ��=0 0 W O VJ l0l^ z_ = w �-J ,Ux W J � < '/fir/ Ii Q ' 'I a . . = CD � < tea/ W vJ M W LLJ L` U DRAWN BY: 3U 0 PM: BL DATE 25JUNE08 REVISIONS: As PROCESS III COMMENTS 0613010B GROUP: FILE: 073913TH PLACE SO, FEDERAL WAY Sheet: �5.0 ight April, 2006 by Jon GravesCopyrArchitects BDC Planners Ld3a I�Nlailna AyM �FIU3a3�.�p a00z s z Nn3rt� BLLIa YL�or D 43-L-LURnSO Ew w� z Z4 -v �TOP OF P{ @ 370.50' TOP OF P/ fi 3ffi. RE -USE OF DOCUMENTS MIS OCCUME W. AND ME IDEAS MI) DESIGNSINCORPOR Ml)HIMIN. AS INSMUM EMS OF PPOFESSIN& SESIACE. 0 w Elf 5 Elf Lu cn 0 co ArmowZAMMOFr ij U)I 1 z �� - l JI--- li 1 Q � � 1- � II I � z 4 I I I �THIRDFLO_OR_ _ _ -:—_:— - / .—.— .—.—.—.---.—.—.—._.—.—.—.—.—.—. �.—.—.—.—.—. .—.--_.—.—.—.—._.—._.—.—.—.—.—.— ... — � @ 352.00'.. � p N Lu s I U cv N OPEN C,4 CJ3 1 l I-:.�T—-h'-k� _ ui < co Q LL — — 11T� Q SECO30 ND FLOOR / _ _ � �— ' - — —T .—. — — _ — — _ — N It- MM 4 N u FIRST FLC NORTH ELEVATION 0 2 5 10 20 / RCAl F- 3/1 R" = V-0" a ; o;5 MATERIAL KEY 1� PAINTED CONC. TILT PANEL Fj PRE -FINISHED METAL CLADDING SYSTEM �3 VENEER CULTURED STONE SYSTEM ® ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM. KAWNEER OR EQ. O5 ALUMINUM WINDOW SYSTEM. KAWNEER OR EQ. © PAINTED STEEL CANOPY �7 HVAC EXHAUST CAP ® PAINTED PVC DOWNSPOUTS. PAINT TO MATCH BACKGROUND. Fj PRE -FINISHED CAP OVER DECORATIVE CORNICE 10 REVEAL IN CONC. TILT PANEL, TYPICAL 11 SCUPPER 12 'COW -TONGUE' OVERFLOW 13 RETAINING WALL 14 MECHANICAL LOUVER 15 APPROXIMATE LINE OF EXISTING GRADE Al RESU co73 � D c�//) Lu / L.1_ Z O U U) V ) W JUN 2 6 20R CITY OF FEDERAPMA BUILDING DEPT. II, z W �z O W O O oU) f ) W Cn LLJ J 3: U) J =Q 3�: Q Lu = o - < W Q �^ v J C'M ch W uj LL- 1 6 J Rio DATE'. 25 JUNE OB REVISIONS: QPROCESS III COMMENTS 1 06130108 GROUP: FILE: OTS 13TH PLACE SO. FEDERAL WAY Sheet: A5.1 Copyright April. 2008 Lay Jon Graves Architects and Planners