17-104389CITY OF
- , Federal Way
August 24, 2016
Fei Tang
City of Federal Way - PW/SWM
33325 8"' Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
RE: File #16-104064-00-AD; PARTIAL EXEMPTION APPROVAL LETTER
Lakota Park, 31334 SW Dash Point Rd, Federal Way
Dear Mr. Tang:
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www. cityoffederalway.. com
Jim Ferrell, Mayor
The Community Development Department has received your request to intrude into a wetland buffer to
maintain and repair a berm on the south side of Lakota Park.
According to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), activities including the following are considered
partial exemptions to the wetland buffer provisions and require written approval from the director:
Essential public facilities, public utilities and other public improvements. The director may permit
the placement of an essential public facility, public utility or other public improvements in
a critical area if no practical alternative with less impact on the critical area(s) exists. The specific
location and extent of the intrusion into the critical area must constitute the minimum necessary
encroachment to meet the requirements of the public facility or utility and not pose an
unreasonable threat to the health, safety, or welfare on or off the subject property. The intrusion
shall attempt to protect and mitigate impacts to the critical area function and values. (FWRC
19.145.120(1)).
The department hereby approves the wetland buffer partial exemption.
This administrative decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies,
and standards relating to this site. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Dave Van
De Weghe, Senior Planner, at (253) 835-2638, or david.vandeweghe@cityoffederalway.com.
Sincerely,
Stacey Welsh
Acting Planning Manager
c: Dave Van De Weghe, SeniorPlnnner
Da. I.D. 74511
RECEIVED
CITY OF
Federal
APPLICATION NO(S)
Way
SEP 12 2017
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Project Name Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Re air Project
MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
33325 8`h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
www.cityoffederalway.com
Date
Property Address/Location 1415 SW 314t1' St. Federal Way WA 98023 AKA Lakota Park
Parcel Number(s) 1221039016
Project Description Constructed in 2004, Lakota berm forms a boundary between Lakota Park and Lakota Wetlands. The berm was designed to protect the upstream
wetlands, protect Lakota Park, and reduce Lakota Creek erosion hazards. The Outlet System of the facility consists of a control structure and an 18-inch diameter concrete pipe that
runs under the Park and outfalls to the east branch o€Lakota Creek.
In 2015, water within the wetlands overtopped the berm, flooded the Felds and track. This flooding was caused by a combination of localized settlement of the bean and blockage at
the outlet control structure. It was determined that portions of the berm had settled as much as 18-inches since initial construction, which makes these areas lower than the emergency
spillway. Further investigation also determined that the $8-inch diameter outlet pipe is deteriorated and in need of repair. The proposed project will mitigate beret set, teniont with
engineered placement of low permeability soil (LPS). Final grade of the berm will be restored to original design. This project will also replace approximately 470 linear feet of
deteriorated 18-inch concrete pipe.
PLEASE PRINT
Type of Permit Required
Annexation
Binding Site Plan
Boundary Line Adjustment
Comp Plan/Rezone
Land Surface Modification
Lot Line Elimination
Preapplication Conference
Process I (Director's Approval)
Process II (Site Plan Review)
Process III (Project Approval)
Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone)
:10rocess VI
SEPA w/Project
- SEPA Only
Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use
Short Subdivision
Subdivision
Variance: Commercial/Residential
Ize(wired Information
sE Single f•atmil L per , si Zoning Designation
Parks & Open_ pace Comprehensive Plan Designation
Value of Existing Improvements
Value of Proposed Improvements
International Building Code (IBC):
N/A Occupancy Type
N/A Construction Type
Applicant
Name: Fei Tang
Address: 33325 8tl' Ave S
City/State: Federal Way, WA
Zip: 98003
Phone: 253-835-2751
Fax: 253-835-2709
Email: fei.tang@cityoffederalway.com
Signature:
Agent (if different than Applicant)
Name:
Address:
City/State:
Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Signature:
Owner
Name: City of Federal Way
Address: 33325 8tl' Ave S.
City/State: Federal Way, WA
Zip: 98003
Phone: 253-835-2751
Fax: 253-835-2709
Email: fei.tang@cityoffederalway.com
Signature:
Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011
Page 1 of 1
k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application
VTY OF
Federal Way
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Repair
File No: 17-104389-00-SE
Proposal: Repair the Lakota Park berm and replace 470 lineal feet of the facility's outlet pipe
within a wetland buffer.
Proponent: Fei Tang
City of Federal Way, PW/SWM
33325 8`1' Ave S.,
Federal Way, WA 98003
Location: Lakota Park
1415 SW 314'' St.
Federal Way, WA 98023
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
Staff Contact: Senior Planner
Dave Van De Weghe
253-835-2638
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal
Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and
regulations. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the City will not act on this proposal for 14 days after the
issuance. Any person may submit written comments within this 14-day period ending at 5:00 p.m.,
November 3, 2017.
Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above 14-day timeline.
Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file a written appeal with the Federal Way
City Clerk no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 24, 2017, stating the reason for the appeal of the
determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Responsible Official: Brian Davis
Title: Director of Community Development
Address: 33325 8t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Phone: 253-835-2601
Date Issued: October 20, 2017 Signature: f
17-104389-00-SE Doc. I.D. 76602
CITY OF
�. Federal Way
October 20, 2017
City of Federal Way - PW/SWM
Fei Tang
33325 8t" Ave S
Federal Way, WA 98003
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www. cityoffederalway.. com
Jim Ferrell, Mayor
Email: Fei.Tan�.c cityoffederalway.com
RE: File 417-104389-00-SE; SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Repair, 31334 SW Dash Point Rd, Federal Way
Dear Mr. Tang:
The city has reviewed the environmental checklist submitted for the Lakota Park project. It has been
determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment.
As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is
enclosed.
A 14-day comment period is required by the SEPA rules (WAC 197-1 1-340). A notice inviting
comments will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, posted onsite, posted on the official public
notification boards of the city and public libraries, and mailed to all property owners within 300 feet
of the site on October 20, 2017. At the end of the comment period, the department will determine if
the DNS should be withdrawn, modified, or issued as proposed. All final determinations may be
appealed within 21 days (November 24, 2017) following the comment deadline. No licenses,
permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period.
Our decision not to require an EIS does not mean that the license, permit, or approval you are seeking
from the city has been granted. Approval or denial of the proposal will be made by the appropriate
administrative or legislative body vested with that authority.
After a final decision has been made on your proposal (i.e., after a permit has been issued), you may,
but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as set forth in RC W 43.21 C.075. The Notice of
Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance
with SEPA can be made. A copy of the Notice of Action form and copies of RCW 43.21 C.080 and
WAC 197-11-680 providing instructions for giving this notice are available from the Department of
Community Development.
The city is not responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. However, the city is responsible for
giving a notice (to parties of record) stating the date for commencing a judicial appeal (including the
SEPA portion of that appeal) if your proposal is one for which the city's action on it has a specified
time period within which any court appeals must be made.
Mr. Tang
October 20.2017
Page 2
Questions regarding the environmental review component should be directed to me at
david.vandeweghe@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2638.
Sincerely,
Dave Van De Weghe, AICP
Senior Planner
enc: DNS
17-104339-00-SE Duc I U 76678
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not_ applicable" or
"does not apply" only when you can explain why it noes not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your pro ❑sal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: hf elpl
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements —that do not
contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
A. Background hf elpl
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: hel
Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Repair Project SEP 12 2017
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
2. Name of applicant: hf elpl COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of Federal Way
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: hf elpl
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 14
33325 8`I' Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003
253-835-2751
Contact: Fei Tang, P.E.
4. Date checklist prepared: 1hel
September 12, 2017
5. Agency requesting checklist: hf gips
LILY' Vl 1 \.U�1 GLl �Y ay
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): hf elpl
Project construction is anticipated to take place in the slimmer of 2018
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. lh. gips
No.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared; directly related to this proposal. fhelpl
The nearby Lakota Wetlands will be delineated by the City's consultant, and the report will be available
soon.
A geotechnical report was prepared by the city's consultant in March of 2017.
City's consultant is working on additional geotechnical study to support the pipe replacement work and
the berm repair design. The report will be available soon.
A partial exemption approval letter was issued in august 24, 2016 for this project.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 1hel
No.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
lkipl
NPDES permit for construction site. This permit will required if the area disturbed by the project is one
acre or more.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project
description.) 1hel
Constructed in 2004, Lakota berm forms a boundary between Lakota Park and Lakota Wetlands. The
berm was designed to protect the upstream wetlands, protect Lakota Park, which in part contains athletic
field for Lakota Middle School, 21st Ave NW, Dash Point Roars, and downstream residents from flooding
as well as reduce Lakota Creek erosion hazards. The Lakota Wetlands are bound by the constructed
earthen berm and function as a natural stormwater detention facility. The outlet system of the facility
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 2 of 14
consists of a control structure and an 18-inch diameter concrete pipe that runs under the Park and outfalls
to the east branch of Lakota Creek.
In 2015, water within the wetlands overtopped the berm, flooded the fields and track. The flooded area
extended onto 21 st Avenue and Dash Point Road, partially flooding north and east bound travel lanes.
This flooding was caused by a combination of localized settlement of the berm and blockage at the outlet
control structure. It was determined that portions of the berm had settled as much as 18-inches since
initial construction, which makes these areas lower than the emergency spillway. Further investigation
also determined that the 18-inch diameter outlet pipe is deteriorated and in need of repair.
The proposed project will mitigate berm settlement with engineered placement of low permeability soil (LPS). Final
grade of the berm will be restored to original design and allow for emergency spillway to operate properly if
capacity of Lakota wetlands detention area is exceeded.
This project will also replace approximately 470 linear feet of deteriorated 18-inch concrete pipe. Although the pipe
is operational, video inspection does indicate the pipe has multiple points of potential failure. This pipe is the
primary conduit for outlet flow of the Lakota wetlands detention area.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist. hj elpl
The project is located on the south side of SW Dash Point Road between 21 st Ave SW and Lakota Middle
School . See the attached vicinity map.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS hel
1. Earth hf e
a. General description of the site: 1hel
(circle one): G
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? hf g
The site is flat.
What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils. 1hel
Arents, Alderwood Material, according to Soil Conservation Service soil map.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe. [hel
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016
Page 3 of 14
No.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. [hel
The project will place approximately 2000 cy of low permeability soil to the top of the berm to restore it
to its original design height. The existing topsoil and unsuitable surface layer will be removed prior to
placing the new low permeability soil. The low permeability soil will be imported from an offsite location
selected by the contractor.
A trench will also be excavated along the alignment of the 18" diameter outlet pipe in order to replace the
pipe. Ifthe excavated material is not suitable, imported material will be used for pipe trench backs►ll, The
quantity for the trench backf►II will be approximately 650 cy. Imported backfill material will be from an
offsite location selected by the contractor.
Ir _ _ I1.. Jam,__.-: I-�
I. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? it so, geiierd-Ily derscribec.
hel
Minor erosion could occur during placement of the imported berm material and during the pipe
e replac ment excavation,
replacement
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? hei
There will be no new impervious surfaces after project construction.
1 J L.. 'J. .,+ i r+ n+c +n + earth, If ant/: J
h. Proposed measures id reduce or control erosion, or Other Impacts .W ,he a )) l2e
During construction, standard temporary erosion control measures will be implemented where soil is
disturbed.
2. Air [hel
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and
give approximate quantities if known. JLeM
During construction, there will be typical emissions from construction equipment and dust. There will be
no emissions when the prniPnt is complete.
J --.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe. ttqM
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: ltpm
Standard construction site dust control measures will be implemented during construction.
3. Water [hel '
a. Surface Water:
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 4 of 14
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. hf elpl
Lakota wetlands are located on the south side of the berm. The wetlands are primarily fed by stormwater
runoff from a large drainage basin. The area near the berm is dry in the summer season. Through the
outlet pipe, the wetlands discharge to the east branch Lakota Creek.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. h� elpl
The project will not require to work over or in the wetland, but will be within 200 feet of the wetland
— see attached plan.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material. hf e
None.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. hf elpl
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
hel
According to FEMA map, the project site lies within Zone X.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. hj elpl
No.
b. Ground Water:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. hf elpl
No.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. hf elpl
NO.
c. Water runoff (including stormwater):
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016
Page 5 of 14
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. h
The only runoff from the project will be stormwater runoff. Stormwater runoff from the site will be
collected by the existing stormwater drainage system.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. hf elpl
No.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so, describe. 1hel
No. The project will restore the function of the berm to its design function.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattern impacts, if any: �hel
During construction, standard ten-iporary erusiun cuHMA iitUdb lUb Will be iniplei..ented.
4, Plant- het
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: hel
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? [hel
Grass oil the berm and along the cutlet pipe alignment will be removed during construction. The area
will be restored will in -kind grass after construction.
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. ltpM
None.
d Pro-ose i landSCaninn 1 ise of native nlantc nr nther measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any: ltplo
Landscaping disturbed by the project will be restored with in -kind vegetation.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. het
No noxious weeds or invasive species known to be on or near the site.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 14
5. Animals hf elpl
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site. hf e
Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Canadian geese
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hf elpl
None.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. h
A large variety of bird species migrate to the Puget Sound region for the summer or winter seasons and
would be expected to use areas within or near the project site. Wintering species include herons, swans,
Canadian geese, pintails, gadwalls, American wigeon, buffleheads, mergansers, ruddy duck, hawks, gulls,
belted kingfisher, rubycrowned kinglet, Townsend's solitaire, thrushes, waxwings, pipits, northern shrikes,
and sparrows.
Bird species that migrate for the summer include herons, teals, ducks, band -tailed pigeon, morning dove,
swifts, common nighthawk, rufous hummingbird, flycatchers, western wood -pewee, swallows, purple
martin, house wren, Swainson's thrush, vireos, warblers, common yellow -throat, western tanager, black -
headed grosbeak, sparrows, and redwinged blackbird.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 1hel
NONE.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. hf e
None.
6. Energy and Natural Resources hf elpl
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc. [hel
The completed project will not need energy to operate.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe. hf elpl
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: hf elpl
N/A
7. Environmental Health hf elpl
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 14
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe. hel
No.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
hel
Not known.
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might anc(:t project development
and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines
located Within the nrniPrt area and in the vicinity. lhelpl
None.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating
life of the oroiect. ihelal
None.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. hel
None.
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 1hel
N/A
b. Noise [hel
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)? hel
None.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site. hf elpl
On a short term bans, normal construction noiSe and traffic between 7 am and 8 pm.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 1hel
Construction hours will be limited to normal working hours (unless otherwise authorized by the City of
Federal Way) to reduce noise impacts on surrounding residential areas.
8. Land and Shoreline Use [hel
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. thel
The site is a city park. Fast is a middle school. North is commercial and church. South is a large wetland
complex. West is single family residential.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016
Page 8 of 14
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated,
how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or
nonforest use? hf e
No.
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: hel
N/A
c. Describe any structures on the site. 1hel
The site is a city park with a track/field and a few sports fields. A parking lot and a small public bathroom
are located north of the site. In addition, there is an earthen berm on the south side of the site that needs to
be restored by this project.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? hf g
No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? hel
Single Family 1 unit/5 acres.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? hf elpl
Parks and open space
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? hf elpl
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
hf eM
A large wetland complex is located on the south side of the berm.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? hf elpl
None.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? hf elpl
None.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1hel
N/A
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any: hf elpl
N/A
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 14
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any: fhel
N/A
9. Housing 1hel
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid-
dle, or low-income housing. h�l�
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing. g. �el
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: hel
N/A
10. Aesthetics [hel
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? h� elp]
The highest point of the existing berm was designed to be four (4) feet tall. In some areas the berm has
been settled up to 1.5 feet. The project will restore the berm to its design height.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? ILLeM
None.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: hel
N/A
11. Light and Glare 1hel
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur? hel
None.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 'hei
N/A
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? hf elpl
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: hel
N/A
12. Recreation fh" e
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? 1hel
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 14
The site is a city park. There are one cinder track, three baseball fields, and two soccer fields in the park.
The top of the berm has been used as a walking trail. The nearby middle school also uses the park for its
PE program.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. hf elpl
The project will not displace any existing recreational uses of the park. In short term, the running track,
the walking trail along the top of the berm, and some of the athletic fields will be temporarily closed
during construction.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: hf e
There will be no long term impact on recreation. To reduce the short term impact during construction, the
project will be constructed in summer time when the nearby middle school will not use the park, and the
project will coordinate with the Parks department so that organized recreation programs will be scheduled
around the construction. Trail closure signs and track closure signs will be installed for the duration of the
project.
13. Historic and cultural preservation hf elpl
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years
old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so,
specifically describe. hel
No.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts,
or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies
conducted at the site to identify such resources. hel
No.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
hIe
Searched WISAARD. EZ1 form was mailed to DAHP.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance
to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. hf e
N/A
14. Transportation hf e
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. hf gj
The main access to the site is provided by 2 1 " Avenue SW and SW Dash Point Road.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016
Page 11 of 14
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? hel
Yes. Metro bus route 901 currently is serving the area in the vicinity of the site.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? hf elpl
None.
d. vv/iii the proposal require any ne�n� nr imrnrn�/Pments to existing roarlc, streets, pedestrian;
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private). hel
No.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe. hf elpl
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would
be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates? hf elpl
None.
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. 1hel
No.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: hf g
N/A
15. Public Services hf p
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. hel
No.
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. hel
N/A
16. Utilities hI elpl
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: hf el
e ectncit natural gas: ex�
telephone anitary sews eptic system,
other
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed. rhel '
None.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 12 of 14
C. Signature ILLeM
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature
Name of signeeop
1
Position and Agency/Organization Wal R141 .
Date Submitted: / Zv/
D. supplemental sheet for nonproject actions he►
(IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro-
duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016
Page 13 of 14
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodpiains, or prime farmlands?
-Proposed measures to protect such resources gr to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016
Page 14 of 14
City of 1300' Parcel
Federal Way Notification area
SW 308TH ST416790- 41676 1' j 941269-
90- 416790@ 0010 0070� N 1 002D
10�^;Qi60a� 416760- 941269• 034600-
�22103-
g0S rSgp _ 0060-i 0030 1 9142 0000
19TH ST i 167M 941269- I
167j)D- 00401 COW
P 9��
�0050 416760- 941239- 122103-
�Qp .-0030 0060
141.B7. Q41263 9141 i.and.na at
ti.Q n 167 Dash Point
87 L 9 08 10070
0100 1.0-- 941269- 122103-
9006
1221 f
9120
1s98sa-
122103- r. 0020 • 189880-
9037 122103- �ip�,p 0010
9088'22103
9087
122025 1�210.i-
925
178980 17'8980-
0D2b 0020
178980 . 0015
0025-
178980-
178980.0030 0010
178990-
D005 �0 178980-
178990- 17
035 �� 0005
0010.178990- _
91 0075. al#1]
1769900680 122103-
0070 9059
178990-
0065 1221 122103-
to 122103- 9058 9057
9D95
122103- 122103-
9060 9054
-1i�000-
12210 ' 01 0
12215 9066 122103-
9079055
SW 316TH sT
122103- 122103J
9072 122103-122103- 9073
9064 9063 .
12210'
122103• 122103.9D81
901.8 _ 9062 I
1�194550
394 50020
._05
—( SW 317TH PL
-" 421540-
0000
122103-
9147
122103-
9052
516
122103-
901Lakota
Park
122103-
9049
-- f 0100 179010=
10- 1 179010- �0080 00070
110-
PL
a-_.�.�090_
79.010- i9010
17901 - oDSo 122103-
001010024 0030 179010�10_�9110
856110- 0040
0000
Legend
King County Tax Parcels
Subject Property
Notified Properties
September 2017
City of Federal Way
33325 8th Ave S.
Federal Way We. 98003
(253) - 835 - 7000
www.cityoffederalway. cam
514930- 514930-0130. 515320
0070 514930- 514930 < 06 .
0060 .0120•
sw 30*4 514930-
ay. 0050 .5153iL0
5�4934-
020 514930= 5153201-. 0721
0040 0686 ; �9153
14830= 072104-
0030' . 51532 9146
0672
51532[7r 072104- 072104-
515320- 0674' 9211 9224
06B1 515320-
0676 072104
9099
0 w.:" 072104-
072104- 9172
921E 072104-
2104 9569
072104- 917 072104-
9203 9123
07 04-
9 1$-•
721 .. 8 2104
1 9085 072104- 9080
94
416800--
Training
48
0D
-.-DD4o
8W 313TH g
Center 072104- - is
9209 H 410800-
$ 016D
416610-
0020
416810-
416810- 0050
0450
416610-
072104-
6440
=f
9143
416810-
R
4� 16$10-
416810 0090Lakota0430
16810-
4 0100
040D416810MiddIe
01.1..0
41M sw
School
0380
416$9 J
0370_ ,
X
416795-
41879 -
0540
p250
416795=1 416795V'uu -
0220
0170
416795a.0200 N' 41
122103- 416795=416795.0180 416-795-418795-
9041 0140 0160 fi795 1Q340 0330 41'
416795- 1 C
416795- 0380. 0560 SW
s
416795-416795- 41679t4 67�E
Scale:
IN0 150 300 Feet
I 1 I
C iYOF
-k
Fedyeral Way
This map Is Intended
for one so a graph lcal representaflon anly.
The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to Its accuracy.
,s. _
n iF
TJ } +
Projectasrpbilll Federal Way
5. T�v
'�A►?
5 '' 3 � M•
Tii S"1'
i •4 ,. , S�. ..� � �� �i ;ice r �; �,� ,
•Y � "y � .' i. .'.. � --yam � ' �I-• !
� �'i _ems � .. _ ,-»:'fir-■'►'; 'r � �' . � �• � _ _�: r r
i
`� N .
An
Re
{-.. 1� .`�►. +P _ ���� Icy -� Tr'• dr � $l.� • •i � `�. , ta.y- "�` .
AM.
Mob
•T.
0
0
4 f 1.
www.federalwaymirror.com Friday, July 7, 2017 [151
Appliances
Appliances
Appliances
Appliances
Appliances
AMANA RANGE
KENMORE FREEZER
KENMORE REPO
NEW APPLIANCES
REPO REFRIGERATOR
Deluxe 30" Glasstop
Repo Sears deluxe 20cu.ft.
Heavy duty washer &
UP TO 70% OFF
Custom deluxe 22 cu. ft.
Range sell clean, auto
freezer 4 fast freeze
dryer, deluxe, large cap,
All Manufacturer Small
side -by -side, icc 6 water
dock & Wner E�dra-
shelves, defrost drain,
w normal, perm-p[ess 8
Drug's, Dents, Scrolohes
disp., cola panels
Large Owen & storage
interior light
gentle cycles.
and Factory lmpeAec-
available
'UNDER WARRANTY*
'UNDER WARRANTY'
• Underwarran[V1 •
dons
UNDER WARRANTY!
Over $800. new. Pay off
Make $15 monthly pay-
off balance
Balance [OR ow* 2
•Under Werranty'
was over $1200 new,
bal.
balance of $193 or make
payments of $14 per
mints or pay
of sa93.
or maks payments of
$25, Call credit door-
For Inquiries, Cal wCran
Appriance Dislralutors 0
now only payoff of
S473 snooks pints of
month. Credit Dept.
Credo Depl.2IX:244-6966
20fr244.6966
14639Tukwaa Ind. Blvd.
onlyy 515 qqeer m0.
os966
206-244-6966
206-244-6966
CraXi oSo.206.24
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
JIMMY DEWBERRY, TODD SCHEIDEGGER, MARI-
LYN P, GARY, and the DICKSON COMPANY, a
Washington corpofadon, on behalf of themselves
and all Others similarly situated.
Plaintiffs.
vs.
CITY Of FEDERAL WAY, a municipal corporation;
CITY OF FEDERAL. WAY POLICE DEPARTMEr
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MUNICIPAL COURT., and
JOHN DOES 1.30.
Dofendants,
No.16-2-30616.1 KIT
NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION
The above -named Plaintiffs, Jimmy Dewberry,
Todd Scheidegger, Marilyn P. Gary, and the Dick-
son Company have sued the City of Federal
Wary and Its police department and municipal
court (colioctivAy, the "Defendants') allegir!g the
school speed zone located on 21st Avenue S.W. in
Federal Way, King County, Washington that is next
to the Fred Meyer store located at 33702 21st Ave -
me S.W. In Federal Way, Washiogton 98023 is an
illegal school speed tone under Washington law,
The Court has allowed the lawsuit to be a class ac-
tion tin behalf at all persons and entities who, from
December 23, 2013 to darn, mra Issued a notice
of InfMolion by the City of Federal Way for travel'
Ing in excess of twenty (20) miles per hour in the
aforesaid school speed zone.
The Court has not decided whelhar the Defendants
did anything wrong. There is no money available
now, and no guarantee there will be. Howa,ror,
your legal rights ere aflectA and you have a
choice to make now: You can do nothing, stay in
this lawsulk await the outcome, and give up certain
rights; or you can ask to be excluded, get out of
this lawsuit, get no hanafits from ft. and keep your
rights to sue the Defendants separately about the
same legal claims in this lawsuit.
The Court will exclude members from the class if
the member so requests by a specilied date, name-
ly August 31, 2017. To ask to be excluded from
the class that was certified in this case, you must
act by. promptly making your request to be exclud-
ed in writing and providing this request to the un-
dersigned attorneys for the Cuss and the Delen-
dants no later than August 31, 2017,
The judgment entered in this case, wheSher fa-
vorable or not, will include all members of the
Class who do not request exclusion. Any member
who does not request exclusion may, if the mem-
ber desires, enter an appearara through counsel.
Lawyers must prove the claims against the Defen-
dants at a trial set to Stan on December 26, 2017.
If money or benefits are obtained from the 0e48171-
dante, you will be notified about hmv to ask for a
share.
Dated this 7th day of June, 2017.
EISENHOWER CARLSON PLLC
By: Alexander S. Kleinborg, WSBA 134449
akleinberg�eisenho-werlaw.com
1201 Pacific Avenue,Suite 1200
Tacoma, WA 98402
Telephone:(253)572-4500
Facsimlfa: (253) 272.5732
Attorneys for Class Members
CHRISTIE LAW GROUP, PLLC
By Robert L. Christie, WSBA #108%
bob&hrislielawg rdup.com
aubrie@chrisllefavrgrou p.com
2100 Westlake Avenue N., Suite 206
Searle, WA 98109
Tetphom. (206) 951.9669
Attorneys for Defendants
Published In the Federal Way Mirror June 16. 23
30 and July 7, 2017
FWM 2468
LEGAL NOTICES
a
Federal Way
NOTICE OF
DETERMINATION OF N04SIGNIHCANCE (DNS)
City of Federal Way Surface Water Management
Conservation Property
File Nm 17-102807.00•SE
Proposal: Proposed demolition of an existing sht-
gle•famfy residence and assochited structures
with potential historical significance, and removal
of underground lust storage tanks.
Proponont Tony Doucette, City of Federal Way
Surface Water Management, 33325 8th Avenue
South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Loealion:36818 81h Avenue South, Federal Way,
WA 98003
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
Staff Contact: Senior Planner have Van Oe
Weghe, AICP, 253-835.2638
The lead agency for this proposal has determined
that it aces not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment, and an environmental
Impact statement IDS) is not required under RCW
4321C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after re-
view of a completed environmental checklist, Fed-
eral Way Comprehensive Plan, and otter municipal
policles, plans, rules. and regulations deaigrtaWd
as a basis for exefcisa of substantive authority un-
der the Stale Environmental Policy Act pursuant to
RCW 43.21C.110. This information Is available to
the public on request.
Further Information regarding this action is
available to the public upon request from the De-
partment 01 f ommuridy DBvalopmem (Cry Hall,
33US 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA
9000). This DNS is luffed under WAC 197.11-
340(2); the lead agency will not act on this propo-
sal for 14 days from the dale below. Commerds
must be submitted by 5:30 p.m. on Juy, 21. 2017.
Unless modified by the City, this determination vnll
became linal following the above comment dead-
line. Any person aggrieved of the OWS foal detar-
minatlon may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal
this determination to the Fedaraf Way City Clark
(address above), no hater than 5:00 p.m. on August
11, 2017, by a written letter staling the reason for
the appeal of the determination. You should be
prepared to mate specific factual objections.
Published In the Fledaral Way Mirror on July 7,
2017.
FWM 2477
Federal Way
ORDINANCE SUMMARY
At their July 5, 2017 Regular Meeting the Federal
Way City Council passed the following ordinances:
ORDINANCE NO.17.837
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way. W81I
ington, relating to the protection and preservation
of landmarks and adding new Chapter 19285 to
the Federal Way Revised Code.
Tho full tent of the ordinances is eivelitabla by Con -
larding Ore City Clerk's office at 253.835.2540.
Copies will be mailed upon request, in accordance
with the City's fee schedule
Deed: July 6, 2017
Stephanie Courtney, CNIC, City Clerk
Published Federal Way Mirror. July 7, 2017
FWM 2478
Federal Way
Notice of Funds Available (NOFA)
2018 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG)
Community Economic Revitalization Funding
The City of Federal Way will be seeiung applles-
tions from non-profit and public agencies for pro-
jecls that benefit Federal Way low- and moderate -
income residents. The primary focus of this fund-
ing is job creation, economic development, and
community revitaGzatlon.
Proposed projects must be eligible for Community
Developmert Bloch Grant (CDBG) lunds appropri-
ated to federal Way under the Housing and Com-
munity Development Act of 1974, as. amended.
Projects must serve Federal Way residents that are
seniors, disabled, have special needs, or qualify as
low- and moderate -income.
What types of projects are eligible for COBS
funds? Any CDBG project must meet one of the
three national objectives:
National Objective #1: Activities Benefiting Low -
and Moderate -Income Persons
National Objective #2: Activities Which Aid in the
Prevention or Elimination of Slums or Blight
National Objective #3: Activities Designed to Meet
Community Development Needs Haviog a Particu-
lar Urgency
For more information on eligible activities, please
visit the following website and review 24 CFR
570.200.207r httplly m.eoh.ppvlegFbllVtext-
idx?SID=b3lf bda85913afc0f01503b1 f0f97185&mc
.hua&node-sp24.3.570.c8 rgrr_div6
CDBG funds may be used to provide assistance to
carry out revital2ation activities, Including Job
creation and community revitalization. Examples
OF eligible projects include, but are not limited te'
-&isiross attraction and retention
-Education, training, and technical assistance pro-
grams that create new jobs that increase living
wages
-Programs that support job growth for low- or
moderate- low income individuals
-Community revitalization
Building construction or acquisition and redevelop-
ment
-Communtty, or neighborhood facilities
-Street improvements such as sidewalks, lighting
in law- t0 moderate- low neighborhoods
Who can apply? Odat!fying nonprofit Organizations
and public agencies serving Federal Way residents
Who are senlors, disabled, have special needs, or
qualify as low- and moderate -income.
When and where will applications be available?
Applications will be available beginning Friday, July
7, 2017. at City Hall and on the City webshe at
hftp:l/wwwxityoffedoralway.com/node/1674.
When and where will the NOFA guidelines be avail-
able? The NOFA guidelines will be available begin-
ning Friday, July 7, 21117, at City Hall and on the
City websie at
httpJlvnvw.e tyoNedaraNrayoominodelt674.
Technical workshop? A technical ass!ance work-
shop will be held cm Wednesday, July 19, 2017
from %.00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. at Federal Way City
Hall, Patrick Maher Room (first floor). Technical
assistance includes answering questions about
COBB regulations; application requ raments; dis-
cussing the proposed project's compliance with
program regulations; and eligibility for funding. We
have reserved time at the end of Ole workshop for
individual conferences with prospective applicants,
if needed. Attendance at the workshop is recom-
mended, but not mardM* for submitting an ap-
plication. You do not need to RSVP to attend the
workshop.
Deadline to Apply? No later than 4:00 pm on
Wednesday, August 9, 2017.
Contact: Jeff Watson at (253) 835-2650 or
jeff.watson@cityoffederalway.com for more infor-
mation.
For TDD relay service, call 1-800-833-6388/TDD or
1-800-833-6384/voice. This notice is available in
alternate formats for individuals with disabilities
and will be translated upon request.
Published in the Federal Way Mirror on July 7,
2017
FWM 2479
/veealGasLi? selling in the classifieds is easy
call us today! 1-800-388-2527
Appliances
STACK LAUNDRY
Deluxe front loading
washer & dryer. Energy
efecienl. 8 cycles.
Lure new condition
• Under Warranty'
Over $1.200 new, now
only $578 or make pay-
ments of $25 per month
206-244-6966
r
Flea Market
Fur Coat floor length,
gray, possibly rabbit,
size 2X. $75
Call253-426-1533
GAS WEED WACKER
Home Life 17" gas
stregght shaft trmmos.
brand new in box, Nevdt
used $80- Dirt Devil Cy-
clonic upright vacuum,
new, $55.
Call 253-857-0539
Refrigerator - Frigidaire
18 cubic foot, Top
Freezer, No frost, While
colored, Refigira-
tor/Freezer, Brand New
Condition $150., Call
YOURaw 57.0539
Souvenir Spoons from
all comers of the world.
$75/ALL or 5/$25
Call 253-426-1533
WOODWORKING 70018
Renniehed Hand Planed,
made In the USA. From
the 1950s, Salley Piano,
14' 85 S45. Stanley
Plane. 9.5'. h3, S32101bc.
Dove TO Jig S65. Made
by Rockwelder, Made in
SA all are In excellent
condition! 206-772-6856.
Wanted/Trade
CASH PAID For: Record
LPs, 45s, Reel to Reel 8
Track Tapes and CDs.
Call TODAY! 206-499-
5307
Birds
Wanted; Parrot. Ama-
mn, Alrlcarn Cw or
Rose -breasted Cocka-
too pfeleiati i. young,
WNW. and tandng.
Will trade Mefie
CoonfAmerican Bob -
ten mix kitten (6 wky, 4
to pick Irom. Selling
Wn$ns5450-S550.
42F050-0734
Cats
iy
J
ReaW!ful Fluff Regdo11
TICA kittens. pel price:
Mi
$600 Rare lk aWer-
pokil. 425.29s•tl218
Dogs
AKC Poodle Puppies
T 2 Males: 1
L OIIt. Phantom
& 1 Black(White Patti
Little Bundles of
Love. 3 Litters due in
JulylAugusl. Reserve
your puff of Love.
360-249-3612
F18 GOLDENDDODLE
PUPPIES - 5 malasr2
Females, all gold to led
coats. Parente are 24
and 27 inchss at shoul-
der and wo4h 50 and M
Pounds. Loving rxmpaly
ono with row shedding,
low atlorgens. Father is
red standard poodle,
mother Is F1 Geldardoo•
rile, oerrrffod for eyes,
hips and knees, healthy
pearls. Wormed, vat
check and first shots.
S1250.
Mlgpsslrvashonlsrsrmg01-
dendoodtec,5hurst-
fiycom
allison 0 dancin-
gleaves.com
206-4M3844
Labrador Retriever
Puppies
Poinlirig Lairs, AKC.
Fanlasac Bloddllnes.
Great Farrifl1yy Dogs,
36mo Baton",
$80D. Call rAO)631-
2391
Miniature
Schnauzers
Salt and Pepper. Dew-
claw's and Ices dorm.
Females S1200.
Males $1000., Rrs!
Shots, will be ready for
forever homes first
week of July! For pick
con or message
[509}531.5578
l
,• I
Garage/Moulin Sales
king county
FEaERA VIAY
ANNUAL
KLOSHEILLAHEE
COMMUNITY
YARD SALE;
JULY 14th & 15th
9 AM TO 3 PM
20 plus homes are
parlictpalingui
SJO`4 St & Enchanted
Parkway, lust South
of WIIdWaves.
MED11110111112
i ■
31919 11t Ave S, Suite 101 1 Federal, Way, WA 98003 1253,925.5565 1253.925.5750 (f)
Affidavit of Publication
Andy Hobbs, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The
Federal Way Mirror, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English
language continually as a weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is
now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned
place of publication of said newspaper.
That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by
City of Federal Way - Community Development
as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once
each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 7th day of July 2017,
and ending on the 7th day of July 2017, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was
regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period.
That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 9$ 5.17,
which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.020.
Subscribed to and sworn before me this 14th day of _August 2017.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
Residing at Buckley
EA � 1111111
%% A VD
,4,�5Si4NFkp; �Uy��
' NOTARY z
PUBLIC
Nam' •S : • = i
1111
r
Technical Memorandum
TO: Fei Tang, PE
City of Federal Way
FROM: Daniel C. Simpson, PE (CA) and Calvin McCaughan, PE
DATE: March 3, 2017
RE: Lakota Park Regional Stormwater Facility Berm Repair
Geotechnical Investigation Data Summary
Federal Way, Washington
Project No. 0238073.010.011
Introduction
RECEIVED
SEP 12 2017
CITY CF FFDERAL WAY
WMMUNi r Y DEVE' GF&!Fp;
This technical memorandum summarizes the geotechnical information obtained by Landau Associates,
Inc. (LAI) for the City of Federal Way's (City's) Lakota Park Regional Stormwater Facility Berm Repair
project in Federal Way, Washington. Our service were provided in accordance with our October 12,
2016 proposal.
Tasks to date have included the advancement of five geotechnical borings with in situ sampling and
geotechnical laboratory testing. The following sections summarize our geotechnical field and
laboratory activities and data obtained to date.
Project Understanding
The City owns and operates the Lakota Park Regional Stormwater Facility, which relies on an earthen
berm to provide stormwater retention. The berm is underlain by peat and has settled since its
construction in 2004.
LAI has compiled geotechnical information, summarized herein, to help the City develop design
solutions to restore the berm to a design elevation of 258.2 feet (ft) above sea level. LAI has
developed this information based on the King County's 1990 geotechnical investigation report (King
County, 1990), the Tetra Tech's 2004 drawing set (Tetra Tech/KCM Inc., 2004), our field investigation,
and our knowledge of similar sites.
Field and Laboratory Activities
On October 27 and 31, 2016, LAI personnel and Holocene Drilling, Inc. of Puyallup, Washington
advanced five hollow -stem auger borings (B-1 through B-5) approximately 14 to 26%2 ft below ground
surface (bgs). Figure 1 shows the project vicinity, and Figure 2 shows the approximate boring
locations. The standard penetration test (SPT) was used to perform in situ testing in each borehole at
approximately 5-ft intervals. Where possible, soil samples were collected at each in situ testing
location. In addition to SPT samples, thin walled Shelby tubes were pushed to collect relatively
undisturbed samples of peaty soil. Geotechnical laboratory testing consisted of moisture content
LANDAU
ASSOCIATES
130 2nd Avenue South • Edmonds, Washington 98020 - (425) 778-0907
Landau Associates
determinations and oedometric compression tests of select samples. LAI's interpreted subsurface
conditions, in situ testing locations, and soil samples are summarized in the boring logs included in
Attachment A. Geotechnical laboratory test results are presented in Attachment B.
Summary of Surface and Subsurface Conditions
The approximately 1,400-ft-long berm separates the relatively flat and grassy area to the north from
the low-lying, forested wetland/stormwater retention facility to the south. The top of the berm is
finished with a crushed stone base coarse and serves as a walking path. Concrete ecology blocks have
been placed one high on portions of the berm, from approximately 550 to 750 ft and approximately
1,050 to 1,250 ft from the westerly end. The side slopes of the berm are covered with turf with some
portions of the southerly berm slope bare. Approximately 975 ft from the west end of the berm, a
reinforced concrete control structure passes through the berm, allowing stormwater flow
downstream via an outlet pipe.
The northerly toe of the berm is finished with a turf -lined drainage Swale with several catch basins to
collect stormwater. Based on measurements taken by LAI, the northerly toe of the berm and the
adjacent playing fields to the north vary from 0 ft to a maximum of approximately 3.6 ft below the top
of the berm, while the southerly toe of the berm and the wetlands to the south vary from a couple of
feet to a maximum of approximately 5.1 ft below the top of the berm. Construction drawings indicate
that the berm was constructed with 3 horizontal to 1 vertical (H:V) side slopes (Tetra Tech/KCIVI Inc.
2004). Actual, observed side slopes vary between 4H:1V and 2.5H:1V.
While limited access to drill rigs prevented LAI from performing subsurface investigations within the
berm, construction drawings indicate that the berm was constructed with a low -permeability mixture
of sand, silt, and gravel and moisture conditioned and compacted to 95 percent relative compaction
during construction. The top elevation of the exploratory borings performed by LAI generally
coincides with the northerly toe of the berm. Borings encountered approximately 3 to 5 ft of fill soils,
generally comprised of very soft to soft silt with some sand and gravel. In some areas, the fill
encountered was predominately sandy and loose. Beneath the fill, borings encountered wetland
deposits comprised of amorphous granular to fine fibrous peat with water contents ranging from
approximately 300 percent to more than 700 percent. Peat thicknesses encountered ranged from
about 7.5 to 9.5 ft near the berm. Beneath the peat, a layer of soft to very stiff silt on the order of 3 to
6 ft thick was encountered. Borings B-1, B-3, and B-5 were advanced below the wetland deposits into
the very dense underlying glacial till. The till is expected to be present beneath the peat and silt
rlanncitc arrncc the cite.
While static groundwater conditions were not determined during the investigation, groundwater
seepage or perched groundwater was encountered at 8 and 8.5 ft bgs in borings B-4 and B-5,
respectively. Groundwater is likely confined below and perched upon the glacial till layer. During the
Lakota Wetland Park Stormwater Facility Berm Repair
Geotechnical Investigation Data Summary 2 March 3, 2017
Landau Associates
wet season, groundwater likely reaches near ground surface on the north side of the berm and is
above ground surface to the south within the wetland.
Geotechnical Soil Properties
Based on our site observations, review, explorations, and laboratory testing, we recommend the soil
profile presented in Table 1 for berm settlement analysis used to evaluate repair alternatives.
Additional settlement information for the peat can be obtained by inspection of the laboratory test
results presented in Attachment B.
Table 1. Recommended Geotechnical Soil Properties
Geotechnical Berm Soil
Fill Soil
Peat
Silt Till
Property
Layer top depth 0 ft
5 ft
8 ft
18 ft —
(below top of berm)
Typical Thickness 5 ft
3 ft
loft
O ft 22 ft
Unit Weight (pcf) vin = 125
ym/ysat = 110
Ym/Ysat = 65
Ym/Ysat = 115 Ym/Ysat = 125
Moisture Content —
51%
392%to 719%
Friction Angle 34'
28'
---
30' 38'
Strain -based
Modified Virgin
T
—
0.45
-
—
Compression Index
CCE
Strain -based
Modified Secondary
--
0.001 to 0.04
—
Compression Index
CaE(a)
(a) Recommended range in values reflects field/observed and laboratory
data under a wide
range of loading conditions.
ft = foot/feet
pcf = pounds per cubic foot
Lakota Wetland Park Stormwater Facility Berm Repair
Geotechnical Investigation Data Summary 3 March 3, 2017
Landau Associates
Closure
LAI looks forward to continuing to assist the City with this project and to the selection and design of
berm settlement repairs. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned with any questions.
LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC.
Daniel Simpson. PE (CA)
Senior Project Geotechnical EnE
Calvin McCaughan, PE
Principal
DCS/%-AIVI/DJF/II CS
[Y:\0238\073\R\G EOTECH DATA REPO RT\LAKOTA PARK DATA SUMMARY TECHNICAL MEMO_n NALDOCXJ
't-+
Attachments: Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site and Exploration Plan
Attachment A. Boring Logs
Attachment B. Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Results
References
King County. 1990. Geotechnical Investigation Report: Lakota Wetland Soils Investigation, Lakota
Wetland Regional Pond, Federal Way, Washington. King County Division of Roads and Engineering.
January 26.
Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 2004. Construction Documents: City of Federal Way, Department of Public
Works, Lakota Wetland Regional Stormwater Facility, Improvements, SW Dash Point Road and
South 3161h Street. January.
Lakota Wetland Park Stormwater Facility Berm Repair
Geotechnical Investigation Data Summary 4
March 3, 2017
-N
N
af�
ft
a,
L.L
[0
a
4a
L
O
Q.
X
LLI
L
Vf
a,
E
a
U
LL
o
vS > m �n
L E >
o a m
v ai
cu
1 U- c E m
o �
Li O pp
O y m
Y U i a1
CJ N
OJ �
u ,p
0
O O
Ln
m J
0
O
cn
Attachment A
Boring Logs
Landau Associates
ATTACHMENT A
FIELD EXPLORATIONS
Subsurface conditions at the project area were explored on October 27 and 31, 2016. The exploration
programs consisted of advancing and sampling five exploratory borings (13-1, B-2, B-3, B-4, and 13-5) at
the approximate locations illustrated on Figure 2 of this report. The exploratory borings were
advanced between 14 and 26% feet below ground surface (bgs) using a hollow -stem auger. Holocene
Drilling, Inc. of Puyallup, Washington under subcontract to Landau Associates, Inc. (LAI) advanced the
hollow -stem auger borings. The exploratory borings were located using existing infrastructure
reference. The ground surface elevations at the exploration locations were not determined.
The field exploration program was coordinated and monitored by LAI personnel, who also obtained
representative soil samples, maintained a detailed record of the observed subsurface soil and
groundwater conditions, and described the soil encountered by visual and textural examination. Each
reprPsentatix/P soil type observed in our exploratory borings was described using the soil classification
system shown on Figure A-1, in general accordance with ASTM International test method D 2488,
Standard Recommended Practice for Description of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure). Logs of the
exploratory borings are presented on Figures A-2 through A-6. These logs represent our interpretation
of subsurface conditions identified during the field exploration program. The stratigraphic contacts
shown on the summary logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; actual
transitions may be more gradual. The soil and groundwater conditions depicted are for the specific
dates and locations reported and, therefore, are not necessarily representative of other locations and
times. A further discussion of the soil and groundwater conditions observed is contained in the text
portion of this report.
Disturbed samples of the soil encountered in the exploratory borings were obtained at selected
intervals using a 1.5-inch, inside -diameter split -spoon sampler. The sampler was driven up to 18
inches into the undisturbed soil ahead of the drill bit with a 140-lb hammer falling a distance of
approximately 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler for the final 12 inches of
soil penetration, or a portion thereof, is noted on the boring logs, adjacent to the appropriate sample
notation. Samples collected in this manner were taken to our laboratory for further examination and
testing. Relatively undisturbed samples also were obtained using direct -pushed Shelby tubes at each
boring location. A discussion of laboratory test procedures and the laboratory test results are
presented in Attachment B. Upon completion of drilling and sampling, the boreholes were
decommissioned in general accordance with the requirements of Washington Administrative Code
173-160.
Attachment A 0238073.010.011
Lakota Park Regional Stormwater Facility Berm Repair A-1 March 3, 2017
MAJOR
DIVISIONS
Soil Classification System
uscs
GRAPHIC LETTER
SYMBOL SYMBOL"'
TYPICAL
DESCRIPTIONS 121(3)
GRAVEL AND
CLEAN GRAVEL
' o 0 o 0 c
GW
Well -graded gravel; gravel/sand mixture(s); little or no fines
_J w m
Q w
GRAVELLY SOIL
or no fines)
(Little>
Poorly graded gravel; gravel/sand mixture(s); little or no fines
o
o o o o
GP
m m
GRAVEL WITH FINES
,
GM
n --
'w
(More than 50% of
fraction
Silty gravel; gravel/sand/silt mixture(s)
GC
z `o'
coarse retained
on No. 4 sieve)
(Appreciable amount of
fines)
Clayey gravel; graveUsand/clay mixture(s)
d
LOZ
SAND AND CLEAN SAND
SW
Well -graded sand; gravelly sand; little or no fines
@
vj r
SANDY SOIL (Little or no fines)
Poorly graded sand; gravelly sand; little or no fines
SP
rcoarse
(More than 50% of SAND WITH FINES
fraction
Silty sand; sand/silt mixture(s)
$M
passed (Appreciable amount of
through No. 4 sieve) fines)
SC
Clayey sand; sand/clay mixture(s)
c
ML
Inorganic silt and very fine sand; rack flour; silty or clayey fine
sand or clayey silt with slight
0 o c N
SILT AND CLAY
plasticity
Inorganic day of low to medium plasticity; gravelly clay; sandy
CL
`m w
day; silty day; lean clay
o =
Z c
(Liquid limit less than 50)
Organic silt; organic, silty clay of low plasticity
OL
Inorganic silt; micaceous or diatomaceous fine sand
{p N IN
Q :S.ts CDMH
X
E v N
(3° `m o
_N
SILT AND CLAY
Inorganic day of high plasticity; fat day
CH
W z
z E
(Liquid limit greater than 50)
Organic clay of medium to high plasticity, organic silt
OH
LL
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOIL
PT J
Peat; humus; swamp soil with high organic content
GRAPHIC LETTER
OTHER MATERIALS SYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS
PAVEMENT
AC or PC
Asphalt concrete pavement or Portland cement pavement
ROCK
RK
Rock (See Rock Classification)
WOOD
WD
Wood, lumber, wood chips
DEBRIS
U O D
DB
Construction debris, garbage
Notes: 1. USCS letter symbols correspond to symbols used by the Unified Soil Classification System and ASTM classification methods. Dual letter symbols
(e.g., SP-SM for sand or gravel) indicate soil with an estimated 5-15% fines. Multiple letter symbols (e.g., MUCL) indicate borderline or multiple soil
classifications.
2. Soil descriptions are based on the general approach presented in the Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual
Procedure), outlined in ASTM D 2488. Where laboratory index testing has been conducted, soil classifications are based on the Standard Test
Method for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes, as outlined in ASTM D 2487.
3. Soil description terminology is based on visual estimates (in the absence of laboratory test data) of the percentages of each soil type and is defined
as follows:
Primary Constituent: > 50% - "GRAVEL," "SAND," "SILT," "CLAY," etc.
Secondary Constituents: > 30% and < 50% - "very gravelly," "very sandy," "very silty," etc.
> 15% and < 30% - "gravelly," "sandy," "silty," etc.
Additional Constituents: > 5% and < 15% - "with gravel," "with sand," "with silt," etc.
< 5% - "with trace gravel," "with trace sand," "with trace silt," etc., or not noted.
4. Soil density or consistency descriptions are based on judgement using a combination of sampler penetration blow counts, drilling or excavating
conditions, field tests, and laboratory tests, as appropriate.
Code
a
b
c
d
e
f
9
h
i
1
2
3
4
Drilling and Sampling Key
SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE NUMBER & INTERVAL
Description
3.25-inch O.D., 2.42-inch I.D. Split Spoon
2.00-inch O.D., 1.50-inch I.D. Split Spoon
Shelby Tube
Grab Sample
Single -Tube Core Barrel
Double -Tube Core Barrel
2.50-inch O.D., 2.00-inch I.D. WSDOT
3.00-inch O.D., 2.375-inch I.D. Mod. California
Other - See text if applicable
300-lb Hammer, 30-inch Drop
140-lb Hammer, 30-inch Drop
Pushed
Vibrocore (Rotosonic/Geoprobe) I^ Q Approximate water level at time of drilling (ATD) I
Other - See text if applicable 1 Approximate water level at time other than ATD
Field and Lab Test Data
LANDAU
ASSOCIATES
Code
PP = 1.0
Sample Identification Number
TV = 0.5
PID = 100
Recovery Depth Interval
W = 10
i�1!
Sample Depth Interval
D = 120
1
-200 = 60
Portion of Sample Retained
P GS
for Archive or Analysis
AL
GT
CA
Groundwater
Lakota Park Regional
Stormwater Facility Berm
Repair
Federal Way, Washington
Description
Pocket Penetrometer, tsf
Torvane, tsf
Photoionization Detector VOC screening, ppm
Moisture Content, %
Dry Density, pcf
Material smaller than No. 200 sieve, %
Grain Size - See separate figure for data
Atterberg Limits - See separate figure for data
Other Geotechnical Testing
Chemical Ana"$
Figure
Soil Classification System and Key A-1
SAMPLE DATA
_I
I
n i m
E
7
CL
a l
m
>
a a�
E c
a
E
rn
o
y
0
W
CD.6
fn
in
H
—0
—
10
15
20
x
3
c�
o'
J
Q
Z_
of
0
in
J
U 25
1
n-
q
30
0
o — 35
I
S-1b b2 2 W = 51
S-1 a
S-2 t b2 3 W = 39:
E
S-3 c I
S-41 b2 18
S-5 I b2 I 50/
Y
Boring Completed 10/27/16
Total Depth of Boring = 13.7 ft.
B-1
SOIL PROFILE
Hollow Auger
Drilling Method: -Stem _
rn
' E
Ground Elevation (ft):
U
(n
a
rn
Logged By: AMW Date: 10/27/16
SM
Grass and sod over 10 inches of brown.
ML
silty, fine to medium SAND with gravel and
\trace organics (roots)
(TOPSOIL)
1
^^
PT
Gray -brown SILT with sand and gravel (very
soft, moist to wet)
_
(FILL)
Dark brown, amorphus granular to fine
I fibrous PEAT with silt and sand (soft, moist)
f (WETLAND DEPOSIT)
I
I
ML T Gray SILT (very stiff, moist)
Gray, silty, fine to coarse SAND with gravel
(very dense, moist)
(GLACIAL TILL)
b Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate.
2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions.
m 3. Refer to "Soil Classification System and Key' figure for explanation of graphics and symbols.
N
O
Lakota Park Regional
Stormwater Facility Berm Log of Boring B-1
LANDAU Repair
ASSOCIATES Federal Way, Washington
LAI Proiect No: 0238073.010.1111
Moisture Content (%)
I plmbt i U9wd
I CrnA ��•7 Umd
I 20 40 60 80
♦ SPT N-Value
I A Non -Standard N-Value a
20 40 60 80
X Fines Content (%) X
20 40 60 80
•
Figure
A-2
3"
5
10
15
20
25
30
B-2
LAI Project No: 0238073.010.
Moisture Content {%)
Waeac Ligyd
SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE
Lima Limit
20 40 60 80
'. o
Drilling Method. Hollow -Stem Auger
♦ SPT N-Value
E
d
T
°o
E
>1 E
Ground Elevation (ft) :
«
A Non -Standard N-Value A
20 40 60 80
c Z m
O
ca
70
u) T
U u%
3
a a2
n
(0
o
a
X Fines Content (%) X
m
w rn as
m
rn
°
Co
a
`� 00
(9 Z)
Logged By: AMW Date: 10/27/16
°
c9
20 40 60 80
SM
Grass and sod over 12 inches of brown,
silty, fine to coarse SAND with gravel and
ML
trace of (roots)
(TOPSOIL)
Brown, sandy SILT with gravel (soft, moist) a
S-1 b2 3 2
(FILL) 2
c
PT Dark brawn, amorphus granular to fine 0
fibrous PEAT with silt and sand (very soft, Lc —
moist)
S-2 b2 0 . W = 392 6
(WETLAND DEPOSIT) z
a`)
m
3
a
c
S-3a c
S-3b c
S-4 b2 0 W = 532
S-5 b2 10 ML ' Gray, very sandy SILT %mth gravel (stiff,
moist)
1
Boring Completed 10/27/16
Total Depth of Boring = 14.0 ft.
35
Notes: 1. Stratigraphic conlacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate.
2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions.
3. Refer to "Soil Classification System and Key' figure for explanation of graphics and symbols.
u
Lakota Park Regional Figure
Stormwater Facility Berm Log of Boring B-2
LANDAU Repair A-3
ASSOCIATES Federal Way, Washington
B-3
LAI
Project No: 0238073.0110J
11
SAMPLE'DATA
SOIL PROFILE
Moisture Content (%)
Plastic
Liquid
Limit L"
20 40 60 80
`m
o
Hollow -Stem Au er
Drilling Method: g•--
m
E CL
z-
y°o
E
j
o
E
---
Ground Elevation (ft):
t?
cc
1
♦ SPT N-Value A
Non -Standard N-Value ra
^°
c
v
r
i
20 40 60 80
I
O 2 it T
�
f
U
US
-0
Y
m a a
N
a
X Fines Content (%) X.
CL
CD
2 m m
2
m
f0
U)
Logged By: AMW Date: 10/27/16
P
2
Lu u) oil u)
m
I-
C7
0
0
20 40 60 80
0
SM
Grass and sod over 10 tnCheffi of brown,
h4L
silty, fine to coarse SAND with gravel and
trace organics (roots)
I
t
(TOPSOIL)
!-
S-1 b2
2
PT
Gray -brown, iron -stained, sandy SILT with
-4
r
0
x r
gravel (very soft, moist)
!
Iu
1_L j
±. -
(FILL)
lr '
5
Dark brown, amorphus granular to fine
0
w
~
fibrous PEAT with silt and sand (very soft.
S 2 °
.n,,,`s
moist)
z
I`
(WETLAND DEPOSIT)
:s
tinny
m
3
_
S-3 b2
0
W= 660
v
o
66
+ w.s
ii3
v
S-4 b2
0
W = 595 1.
j
59
S
ML r
Gray SILT (stiff, moist)
II
j
S-5 b2
8
-grades to sandy and with gravel
j
S-6 b2
3
-grades to soft
i
sM yJGray,
silty, fine to coarse SAND with gravel
_
(very dense. moist)
(GLACIAL TILL)
a
20
501
0
o
i
o
m
0 25
i
S-8 b2
68
I�
I
Boring Completed 10/27/16
Total Depth of Boring = 26.5 ft.
30
35
Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate.
2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions.
3. Refer to "Soil Classification System and Key" figure for explanation of graphics and symbols.
LALANDAU
ASSOCIATES
Lakota Park Regional
Stormwater Facility Berm
Repair
Federal Way, Washington
Log of Boring B-3
Figure
A-4
B-4
LAI Project No: 0238073.010.
PiasMoEsture Content (%)quid
SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE
- —
Limit^ram Lima
20 40 60 80
a -5 I o Drilling Method: Hollow -Stem Auger
A SPT N-Value
+
T a E Ground Elevation ft:
~ °o ()
oNnn-Standard N-Value o
20 40 60 80
c Z — m U) T
o aD Z 2 LL io 0 i
'i
Y a a? a LO o n rn
X Fines Content (%) X
aa) m m ° m `� U) Logged By: AMW Date: 10/27/16
°
C7
20 40 60 80
o w 0 °a cn m H c7 0
0
SM
Grass and sod over 13 inches of brown,
silty, fine to coarse SAND with gravel and
SM
trace organics (roots)
{TOPSO[L)
W
A
Light brown, silty, fine to coarse SAND with
S-1
b2
B
gravel (loose, moist)
_°`
(FILL)
3
v
5
c
o,
33(
PT
Dark brown, amorphus granular to fine
S-2
b2
0
W = 336
fibrous PEAT with silt and sand (very soft,
v
moist)
(WETLAND DEPOSIT)
a
-grades to red -brown
S-3
c
_ _ _
ML
Gray, very sandy SILT with gravel (soft, wet)
10
S-4
b2
3
-grades to moist to wet and medium stiff
S-5 Mli b2 1 7
.-.15 Boring Completed 10/27/16
Total Depth of Boring = 14.0 ft.
—20
— 25
— 30
-- 35
Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate.
2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions.
3. Refer to "Soil Classification System and Key' figure for explanation of graphics and symbols.
Lakota Park Regional Figure
Stormwater Facility Berm Log of Boring B-4
LANDAU Repair A- 5
ASSOCIATES Federal Way, Washington
SAMPLE DATA
CD
a
c Z m o
L �p E t
CL No
-a > Ec
o w rn tad in m
0
I
5
10
15
20
30
S-1 b:
I
S•2 b,
I
I
S-3 I c
S- b,
S-5b,
S-6 W
N
0
Q
2
7
f
I
0 !W=719
B-5
LAI Project No: 0238073.010,
i
SOIL PROFILE
I
Moisture Content (%)
I
Plastic , Liquid
Limn^r1 Limit
20 40 60 80
o
o
Hollow -Stem Auger
Dulling Method:j
T
♦ SPT N-Value
E
Ground Elevation (ft): — _- _
20 Non -Standard 6NOValue 80
U
�
3
L
L)
I X Fines Content (%) X
5
I U)
Logged By: AMW Date: 10/27/16
20 40 60 80
I SM
Grass and Sod over 12 inches of brown,
ML
silty, fine to coarse SAND with gravel and
trace organics (roots)
o
°O
(TOPSOIL)
m
Light brown -gray SILT with sand and gravel
(very soft, moist to wet)
2
'
�—
j (FILL)
c
C2
0
I �
PT
Dark brown, amorphus granular to fine
fibrous PEAT with silt and sand (very soft,
f moist)
o
a
i (WETLAND DEPOSIT)
V
0 I W = 367 1"
6
54 b2 60
f`
i I
S6�j� b2 ! 50/
i
Boring Completed 10/27/16
Total Depth of Boring = 26.5 ft.
t
ML Gray SILT (medium stiff, moist) _
SM i Gray, silty, fine to coarse SAND with gravel
(very dense, moist)
(GLACIAL TILL)
f I
I
35
Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate
1 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions
01 3. Refer to "Soil Classification System and Key" figure for explanation of graphics and symbols.
0
V
,
Lakota Park Regional
Stormwater Facility Berm LogOf Boring B-5
LANDAU Repair g
ASSOCIATES Federal Way, Washington
A
Figure
A-6
5"
ATTACHMENT B
Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Results
Landau Associates
ATTACHMENT B
LABORATORY SOIL TESTING
Soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings were taken to our laboratory for further
examination and testing. Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to
characterize certain engineering and index properties of the soils along the project alignments. The
laboratory testing program was performed in general accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM)
standard test methods noted below.
Natural Moisture Content
The natural moisture contents of selected soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings were
determined in general accordance with ASTM D 2216 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory
Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass test methods. The results from
the moisture content determinations are indicated adjacent to the corresponding samples on the
summary logs presented in Attachment A.
One -Dimensional Incremental Load Consolidation Test
Consolidation properties of the subsurface soil were evaluated with two one-dimensional incremental
loading consolidation tests performed in general accordance with ASTM D 2435 Standard Test
Methods for One -Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading test
methods. Incremental loads applied during the tests were 250; 500; 1,000; 2,000; and 4000 pounds
per square foot. The purpose of these tests was to measure the rate of secondary compression and
the modified virgin compression index. The consolidation tests were performed on relatively
undisturbed samples of subsurface soil obtained from Shelby tube samplers.
Attachment B 0238073.010.011
Lakota Park Regional Stormwater Facility Berm Repair B-1 March 3, 2017
J
M
5
10
c
25
30 1
100
0
2
4
0
c
2 6
4-
U)
U 8
N
10
12
0.01
N
LANDAU
ASSOCIATES
1000
Vertical Stress (psf)
250 psf
500 psf
1000 psf
k Cas = 0.001
k
k
k
k
k Cas = 0.004
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cas = .012
10000
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Time (min)
City of Federal Way Figure
Lakota Park Regional Stormwater Facility B-2 S-3b Consolidation
Berm Repair Test Results 6-1
Federal Way, Washington
E
25
MIM
35 '--
100
1000
Vertical Stress (psf)
2
3
0
4
U) 5 ~
� 6 -
250 psf_
7
500 psf
8
1000 psf
9
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Time (min)
City of Federal Way
LANDAU Lakota Park Regional Stormwater Facility
ASSOOKFES Berm Repair
Federal Way, Washington
I
10000
t
CM = 0.002
Ca£ = 0.004
i
i
i
Ca£ = 0.009
1000 10000 100000
B-5 S-3 Consolidation I Figure
Test Results I B=&-*,—)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL
DATE:
9/25/2017
TO:
Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager
Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner
Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer
Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District
Tony Parise & Gordon Goodsell, South King Fire &
Rescue
FROM:
Dave Van De Weghe, Planning
FOR DRC MTG. ON:
10/12/2017 - Internal completeness and technical
reviews
FILE NUMBER(s):
17-104389-00-SE
RELATED FILE NOS.:
None
PROJECT NAME:
LAKOTA PARK STORMWATER FACILITY REPAIR PROJECT
PROJECT ADDRESS:
31334 SW DASH POINT RD
ZONING DISTRICT:
SE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Environmental review for the repair of storm water
facility
LAND USE PERMITS:
SEPA
PROJECT CONTACT:
Fei Tang, SWM Project Engineer, x2751
MATERIALS SUBMITTED: SEPA Checklist
Technical Memo
Berm Repair Plan and Profile
CITY OF
Federal Way
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RECEIVE® 33325 81h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
SEP 12 2017 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
w►vw.c itvo f fed era hva%,.com
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Project Name: Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Repair Project
File No(s):
• This form is to be used by an applicant as a guide in determining what constitutes a complete
application for SEPA review. This guide is for projects that do not have an associated land use
process.
• All checked items must be submitted to constitute a complete application. If you are unsure of a
requirement, please contact a planner prior to submittal.
• Applicant will be notified of a complete application within 28 days.
• A complete application does not imply compliance or conformance with applicable codes.
• Additional fees may be required for consultant review of critical areas.
Bulletin #065 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 3 k:/Handouts/SEPA Submittal Requirements
General Plan Standards
■ Plans must be assembled into sets and folded to 9 x 12 inches.
• Minimum plan sheet size shall be 22 x 34 inches.
• Plans must be drawn at an engineering scale that allows the entire plan to fit on one sheet.
• Minimum scale is 1" = 20' unless otherwise authorized.
• All information is to be legible.
• All drawing sheets shall include:
• Project name, plan date, and/or revision date(s)
• Name, phone number, and license stamp of preparer
• North arrow and bar scale
■ Name and phone number of owner/agent
Required
Submitted
❑
❑
Site Plan
• Vicinity map
• Site area
• Total parking stall count
• Total gross floor area of all proposed floors or levels
■ Location and dimensions of existing/proposed structures, property lines, sidewalks,
easements, parking layout, street edges, mechanical equipment, trash enclosures, outdoor
uses, storage areas, fencing, rockeries, and retaining walls
■ Property lines, utilities, easements, sidewalks, street edges, existing structures, parking, and
site improvements (i.e. drainage systems with pipe sizes, invert and rim elevations, etc)
• Delineate streams, ponds, wetlands, natural drainage courses, and other surface water
features on or within 200 feet of site per Chapter 14.30 FWRC, "Critical Areas"
■ Location of strands of trees as defined by FWRC 19.05.200
• Existing and proposed utilities including: utility poles and boxes, water, storm sewer,
sanitary sewer, and fire hydrants
• Structures and driveways within 150 feet of subject site (on both sides of street)
• International Building Code (IBC) construction type and occupancy classification
• Location and square footage calculations of any on -site pedestrian areas (i.e., plazas,
courtyards) or open space areas
• Minimum two foot contours for slopes less than 15 percent and five foot contours for slopes
15 percent or greater; datum shall be King County Aerial Survey or NGVD-29
• Delineate slopes greater than 40 percent grade on or within 25 feet of the site
❑
❑
Preliminary Landscape Plan
• Specific location, type, size, and number of trees with a dbh greater than six inches to
remain and to be removed
• Plant schedule with the scientific name, common name, size, spacing, and quantity of each
• Specific location and square footage calculations of drought tolerant landscaping (document
that a minimum 25 percent is provided per FWRC 19.125.040[61)
• Irrigation plan for lawn areas
• Specific location, square footage calculations, and total square footage of each parking lot
landscape island per FWRC 19.125.070(2)(a)
• Screening of outdoor facilities such as: trash/recycling enclosures, outdoor storage, drive
through facilities, stormwater facilities, and ground based mechanical equipment
• Building wall area landscaping per FWRC 19.125.040
• Specific location of street trees in the right-of-way
• Identify perimeter landscape type as I, II, or III
Bulletin #065
— January 1, 2011
Page 2 of 3 k:/Handouts/SEPA Submittal Requirements
❑ ❑ Preliminary Drainage, Grading, and Right -of -Way Plan
• Preliminary storm drainage system in accordance with the King County Surface Water
Design Manual (KCSWDM), as amended by Federal Way
■ Preliminary grading plan with finished contours; minimum two foot contours for slopes less
than 15 percent and five foot contours for slopes 15 percent or greater; datum shall be King
County Aerial Survey or NGVD-29
■ Preliminary right-of-way improvement plan, as required by the Public Works Department
• Approximate cut & fill quantities of site earthwork
■ Total existing and proposed impervious surface area
• Existing and proposed utilities including: utility poles and boxes, water, storm sewer,
sanitary sewer, and fire hydrants
Special Studies and Additional Information
❑ Geotechnical study/report
❑ ❑ Wetland delineation report
❑ ❑ Wetland mitigation plan
❑ ❑ Stream delineation and classification report
❑ ❑ Critical aquifer recharge & wellhead protection areas information/inventory
❑ ❑ Other information relating to design and siting of proposed development (including site
cross sections) to demonstrate compliance with city goals, Policies, and re uiations
Bulletin #065 —January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 3 k:/Handouts/SEPA Submittal Requirements
FILE
CITY OFF
Federal Way
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) NOTICE
Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Repair
File No: 17-104389-00-SE
Proposal: Repair the Lakota Park berm and
replace 470 lineal feet of the facility's
outlet pipe within a wetland buffer.
Proponent: Fei Tang
City of Federal Way, PW/SWM
33325 8`' Ave S.,
Federal Way, WA 98003
Location: Lakota Park
1415 SW 314t' St.
Federal Way, WA 98023
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
Staff Contact: Senior Planner Dave Van De Weghe
253-835-2638
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal
Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and
regulations. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the City will not act on this proposal for 14 days after the
issuance. Any person may submit written comments within this 14-day period ending at 5:00 p.m.,
November 3, 2017.
Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above 14-day timeline.
Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file a written appeal with the Federal Way
City Clerk no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 24, 2017, stating the reason for the appeal of the
determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Responsible Official: Brian Davis
Title: Director of Community Development
Address: 33325 8`" Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Phone: 253-835-2601
Published in the Federal Way Mirror, October 20, 2017.
17-104389-00-SE Doc I.D. 79184
DEPARTMENT OF COMNIUNITi- DEVELOPNIENT
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way WA 980M
C1T` 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609
www.citvoffederalway.com
DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION
r, �1— ��,, ., — hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of
Washington, that a:
❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action
❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce
(DS) and Scoping Notice
Notice of Environmental Determination
of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS)
❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental
Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA,
MDNS)
❑ Notice of Land Use Application &
Optional DNS/MDNS
❑ FWRC Interpretation
❑ Other
❑ Land Use Decision Letter
❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the
Hearing Examiner
❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public
Hearing
❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing
❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline
Management Permit
❑ Shoreline Management Permit
❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental
Document
was CP mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on
, 2017.
Project Name D�a rM l�P
File Number(s) 7 15y �$
-i�7Signature --- Date
K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Losl printed 1/12/2017 10:33:00 AM
41k
CITY OF
Federal Way
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) NOTICE
Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Repair
File No: 17-104389-00-SE
Proposal: Repair the Lakota Park berm and
replace 470 lineal feet of the facility's
outlet pipe within a wetland buffer.
Proponent: Fei Tang
City of Federal Way, PW/SWM
33325 8`h Ave S.,
Federal Way, WA 98003
Location: Lakota Park
1415 SW 3141h St.
Federal Way, WA 98023
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
Staff Contact: Senior Planner Dave Van De Weghe
253-835-2638
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal
Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and
regulations. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the City will not act on this proposal for 14 days after the
issuance. Any person may submit written comments within this 14-day period ending at 5:00 p.m.,
November 3, 2017.
Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above 14-day timeline.
Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file a written appeal with the Federal Way
City Clerk no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 24, 2017, stating the reason for the appeal of the
determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Responsible Official: Brian Davis
Title: Director of Community Development
Address: 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Phone: 253-835-2601
Published in the Federal Way Mirror, October 20, 2017,
17-104389-00-SE Doc. I.D. 79184
J
O
M M M 00 M M M M M M M M M M M M M
O O O O CD O O O O O O O O O O O
00 00 00 ¢ 00 a\ O\ ON O, a1 O� 000 00 00 00 00 00 000 a, Q\ p ON C, a1 O\ N O�
00 00°� 3
0-02 ¢ O� Q 000 Q 0Q N¢¢ Q Q¢ N Q Q N Q¢¢¢ O Q
3 33 p 3 3 3 3 3 3¢ 3 3 3 3 3 3 00w ON
3
� 33333°�3� 33033333w33� 30333333
U)n
w w W
E w U 3 w > W W w W W cC W ^� w W W W W O W
�pzprapQcawpQ a pzppQpUp
wwwww�w`l' �wWwwwwLLJ w¢wwww¢w
Q C/) L. C/) w 5 u- w U. w"� w w p w o w r_,. w� E ❑
a:
O O O o
0
o
o
Cx�7
w cn Q V) x O F- x LL)w cl)
J U> rW j U00 QQ
cn O
-a p pQz Z7ZNcnUx7F- 4
U NNN 000 m cn N w hoo
Q o0
cr- o W 2 V)C/) v ,n U O Gq C/) oo c-C/) _ O N E a n
Q M oo - cV N ^ N N r^ m O N N N M O N O"T" N N
p M O �O tt 00 M v"� � M CDO � N � [
00 N W` ^
O M 1-� M 00 O l0 N l� � ^ O ^ N M
Q M M M N M 00 ^ M ^ G. M
W
U
W
M�
w
Y
u
O
0.
w
L
p
p
w
O
Q
z
>
z¢
p
z
J
O
H
Q
p�
ULTJ
O
U
Z
~
u 0.
i�0
YO
Q � a
p Z w ¢ z ¢ m
¢ o ¢ w O x w z U coo p O U.
a� U U O O h Q +¢ .a1 rL W ti J > w O
CL w * cn U Cn
z o¢ Q U 0 z Q Q Q¢ cn Z F z w p .a w w can Z¢
c� w
} z¢ 3 `�' z Q¢¢ ¢ 3 Q p 3 ca a o w z a cn cn o c7 a
Q rt H x w z O z O z w � M w o! w w O z x w
a N w Q Q O D a¢ w W>> u: > U 1 CO C1
¢ w W Q a w w c� w w O
U 3 L. w u- Q w C7 U i w a cn
O, DD �/'� d\ N V ON
00 V O O V) Ln v) vl kn kn �o 110 DD V O
O N N N O O O CD O O O O O O O O C: Cl O O 0 0 0 O v'l
Q\ O, O1 O\ 01 � O� O1 al ON O1 O> U O1 O1 O\ allON� ON O11 Q\ O O O O O O
� � ItM M M M M M M M M M M M cl; M M M M O O O O O kr1
O_ O CD CD O O O_ O CD CD O CD 00
00 00 O 00 O1
N N N N N N N cV N N N N fV N N N N C`l N cV (,q N 00 00 00 D\ 00
C) [D N N N N N N N N Cl N— N N N N N N—— -- o0
T N --
m'IT LO (D m O r N MI;t (() (D I— 00 m O r N CO U') (D I� co
T r T T T T r r T r N N N N " N N N N
A�k
CITY OF
Federal Way
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way WA 98003
253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609
www.cilyoffederalway.com
DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION
1, I/�nv�\417r V/esk,, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of
Washington, that a.
❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action
❑ Notice of Determination of Significance
(DS) and Scoping Notice
Notice of Environmental Determination
of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS)
❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental
Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA,
MDNS)
❑ Notice of Land Use Application &
Optional DNS/MDNS
❑ FWRC Interpretation
❑ Other
was ❑ mailed
0,r , 2 ()
Project Name .
File Number(s)
Signatvr44
❑ Land Use Decision Letter
❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the
Hearing Examiner
❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public
Hearing
❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing
❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline
Management Permit
❑ Shoreline Management Permit
❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental
Document
❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or 1posted to or at each of the attached addresses on
2017.
otkotA
7-ID
31-00-Sc
Date f0,2-®,,/7
I:\Declaration of DistHbution.doc/Last printed 8/11 /2017 11:45:00 AM
Posted Sites:
Federal Way City Hall: 33325 8th Ave South
Federal Way Library: 34200 1 st Way South
Federal Way 320th Library: 848 S. 320th St
I:\Declaration of Distdbution.doc/Last printed 8/11 /2017 11:45:00 AM
DEPARTMENT OFCOMMUNITV DEVELOPMENT
qqM
81h Avenue South
Federal Way WA 98003
CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609
F w,.cit aftedetCllw col�
a,
DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION
�, ► hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of
Washington, that a:
❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action
❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce
(DS) and Scoping Notice
hbv#et-of Environmental Determination
of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS)
❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental
Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA,
MDNS)
❑ Notice of Land Use Application &
Optional DNS/MDNS
❑ FWRC Interpretation
❑ Other
❑ Land Use Decision Letter
❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the
Hearing Examiner
❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public
Hearing
❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing
❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline
Management Permit
❑ Shoreline Management Permit
❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental
Document
was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed Ke-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on
Project Name L k v- � K :6?r
File Number(s) 17 �1bYvFs'g
Signature Date
K:\CD Administration Files\Decloro lion of Distribution doc/Last printed 1/12/2017 10:33:00 AM
lc-.
4k
CITY of
Federal Way
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Repair
File No: 17-104389-00-SE
Proposal: Repair the Lakota Park berm and replace 470 lineal feet of the facility's outlet pipe
within a wetland buffer.
Proponent: Fei Tang
City of Federal Way, PW/SWM
33325 8 h Ave S.,
Federal Way, WA 98003
Location: Lakota Park
1415 SW 314`' St.
Federal Way, WA 98023
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
Staff Contact: Senior Planner
Dave Van De Weghe
253-835-2638
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal
Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and
regulations. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the City will not act on this proposal for 14 days after the
issuance. Any person may submit written comments within this 14-day period ending at 5:00 p.m.,
November 3, 2017.
Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above 14-day timeline.
Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file a written appeal with the Federal Way
City Clerk no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 24, 2017, stating the reason for the appeal of the
determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Responsible Official: Brian Davis
Title: Director of Community Development
Address: 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Phone: 253-835-2601 f
r`l
J
Date Issued: _ October 20 2017 Signature:
17-104389-00-SE
Doc I.D. 76602
SEPA CHECKLIST TO THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES:
LAKOTA PARK, 1415 SW 314" St, FEDERAL WAY (17-104389-00-SE)
JOHN MULKEY
PAC HWY PHASE V Project Manager
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
STREETS DIVISION
John. Mulkev .cityoffederalway.corn
DEPT OF ECOLOGY
SEPA UNIT
PO BOX 47703
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703
se are inter ec .wa. ov
DEPT OF ARCHAEOLOGY &
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
PO BOX 48343
OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343
gretchen.kaehler dahp.wa.gov
GARY KRIEDT
KING COUNTY TRANSIT DIV
ENV PLANNING MS KSC-TR-0431
201 S JACKSON ST
SEATTLE WA 98104-3856
qa[y.kriedtAkinqcountV.qov
ATTN SEPA REVIEW
PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR
AGENCY
1904 3RD AVE STE 105
SEATTLE WA 98101-3317
sepa@pscleanair.org
BRANDON REYNON
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT
3009 E PORTLAND AVE
TACOMA WA 98404
brandon.reynonouyalluotribe.com
WA ST DEPT TRANSPORTATION
PO BOX 47300
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7300
hacustomerservice rwsdot.wa.cgov
PUGET SOUND
PARTNERSHIP
210 11T" AVE SW STE 401
OLYMPIA WA 98504-0900
info@i)sb.wa.gov
REVIEW TEAM
WA DEPT OF COMMERCE
GROWTH MGT SERVICES
PO BOX 42525
OLYMPIA WA 98504-2525
reviewteam commerce.wa. ov
JAMEY TAYLOR
DNR SEPA CENTER
PO BOX 47015
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015
sepace me r(5d n r.wa. gov_
PSRC
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
DEPT
1011 WESTERN AVE #500
SEATTLE WA 98104-1040
eharris src.or
LAURA MURPHY
TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
39015 172ND AVE SE
AUBURN WA 98092
Iaura.murr)hy(cDmuckleshoot.ns
n.us
KELLY COOPER
DEPT OF HEALTH
ENVIRON HEALTH DIV
PO BOX 47820
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7820
kelly.cooper ,_doh.wa.cgo�
DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTF
LANDS AND BUILDING DIVI
PO BOX 45848
OLYMPIA, WA 98504
hubenb' dshs.wa. ov
BRIAN ASBURY
LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST
PO BOX 4249
FEDERAL WAY WA 98063
bash urV@ lake haven: o rg
Dale Myers
NWRO Toxics Cleanup Progr
Department of Ecology
3190 160th Ave SE, Bellevue
98008 dam 461 Recy.wa.go�
SOLID WASTE DIV
KING CO DEPT OF NATURP
201 S JACKSON ST STE 70
SEATTLE WA 98104-3855
kevin.kiernan _ kinacounty go
41
KRISTI KYLE
re
PSE REGIONAL STRUCTUF
PO BOX 97034
BELLEVUE WA 98009-9734
PERRY WEINBERG
SOUND TRANSIT
401 S JACKSON ST
SEATTLE WA 98104-2826
err .weinber soundtransit
KC DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS
500 4T" AVE RM 700
#ADM-AS-0708
SEATTLE WA 98104
assessor. i nfo@kingcou nty. gov
ECON DEV COUNCIL OF
SEATTLE & KING COUNTY
13015 6T" AVE STE 1500
SEATTLE WA 98101
info(a)edc-seaking.org
JASON TESDAL
CENTURY LINK COMMUNIC
23315 66T" AVE S
KENT WA 98032
lason.tesdal(a'bcenturylink.corr
KING CO TRANSPORTATION SOUTH KING COUNTY
LAND US SVC KCDDES 201 S JACKSON ST KSC-TR- REGIONAL WATER ASSOCI
35030 SE DOUGLAS ST, #210 0815 27224 144T" AVE SE
SNOQUALMIE, WA 98065 SEATTLE WA 98104 KENT WA 98042
harold.t_aniguchi@_kingcounty.gov customerservice@wd1_11.con
�\ MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN tvaslet(@Piercetransit.orq
TRIBE PIERCE TRANSIT
JERRY STEELE
COMCAST CABLE COMM
4020 AUBURN WAY N
AUBURN WA 98002-1315
FISHERIES DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEWER
39015 172ND AVE SE
AUBURN WA 98092
karen.walterCa muckleshoot.nsn
DAVID KORTHALS, SD PLANNER LARRY FISHER
METRO TRANSIT D T. OF FIS:NEW
ES &
201 S JACKSON ST KSC-TR-0324 WILDXFE
SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 1775 STE 201
plansreview(c�r,kingcounty.gov ISSA27
Larra. ov
HOLLY WILLIAMSON
OLYMPIC PIPELINE CO
2319 LIND AVE SW
RENTON WA 98055
holly.williamsonp,bp.com
DENNIS LEWARCH
THP OFFICE
SUQUAMISH TRIBE
18490 SUQUAMISH WAY
SUQUAMISH WA 98392
dlewarch(c suquamish.nsn.us
LARRY FISHER (freshwater) CITY OF DES MOINES
WDFW AREA HABITAT BIOLOGIST 21630 11T" AVE S
1775 12 THAVE NW STE 201 DES MOINES WA 98198
ISSAQUAH WA 98027 dlathro desmoineswa. ov
larry.fisher@dfw.wa.gov
EARTHCORPS
FRIENDS OF THE HYLEBOS
6310 NE 74T" ST STE 201 E
SEATTLE, WA 98115
infoaearthcorps.orq
CITY OF KENT
ECON & COMMUNITY DEV
400 W GOWE ST STE 300
KENT WA 98032
tannin kentwa. ov
MIKE BULZOMI
SOUND TRANSIT
m i ke. b ulzom i@so u ndtrans it. orq
BRIAN 4SBURY
LAKEHA UT TY DIST
PO BOX 4249
FEDERAL Y 98063
basbury . akehaven.oro
[off
CITY OF
Federal Way
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) NOTICE
Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Repair
File No: 17-104389-00-SE
Proposal: Repair the Lakota Park berm and
replace 470 lineal feet of the facility's
outlet pipe within a wetland buffer.
Proponent: Fei Tang
City of Federal Way, PW/SWM
33325 8`h Ave S.,
Federal Way, WA 98003
Location: Lakota Park
1415 SW 314t' St.
Federal Way, WA 98023
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
Staff Contact: Senior Planner Dave Van De Weghe
253-835-2638
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal
Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and
regulations. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the City will not act on this proposal for 14 days after the
issuance. Any person may submit written comments within this 14-day period ending at 5:00 p.m.,
November 3, 2017.
Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above 14-day timeline.
Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file a written appeal with the Federal Way
City Clerk no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 24, 2017, stating the reason for the appeal of the
determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Responsible Official: Brian Davis
Title: Director of Community Development
Address: 33325 8 h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Phone: 253-835-2601
Published in the Federal Way Mirror, October 20, 2017.
17-104389-00-SE Doc 1,D. 79184
11
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITI' DEVELOPMENT
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way WA 98003
CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609
Fe e i4 I Wa www.cit ofPederalwa . ' rn
y
DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION
"</
1, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of
Washington, that a:
❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action
❑ Notice of Determination of Significance
(DS) and Scoping Notice
Notice of Environmental Determination
of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS)
❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental
Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA,
MDNS)
❑ Notice of Land Use Application &
Optional DNS/MDNS
❑ FWRC Interpretation
❑ Other
❑ Land Use Decision Letter
❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the
Hearing Examiner
❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public
Hearing
❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing
❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline
Management Permit
❑ Shoreline Management Pemnit
❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental
Document
was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed )9 e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on
Project Name V-
File Number(s)
Signature
J. 7-Ab y 3 &
I -a
Date 1
KACD Adminislrafion Files\Declaration of Distribufion.doc/Los t printed 1/12/2017 10:33:00 AM
Tamara Fix
From: Tamara Fix
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 9:09 AM
To: John Mulkey; Fei Tang; 'separegister@ecy.wa.gov'; 'gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov';
'gary.kriedt@kingcounty.gov'; 'sepa@pscleanair.org';
'brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com'; hgcustomerservice@wsdot.wa.gov;
'info@psp.wa.gov'; 'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov'; 'sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov';
eharris@psrc.org; 'laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; kelly.cooper@doh.wa.gov;
hubenbj@dshs.wa.gov; 'basbury@lakehaven.org'; damy461@ecy.wa.gov;
'kevin.kiernan@kingcounty.gov'; 'kristina.kyle@pse.com';
'perry.weinberg@soundtransit.org'; assessor.info@kingcounty.gov;
plansreview@kingcounty.gov, 'holly.williamson@pb.com'; 'Fisher, Larry D (DFW)';
info @earthcorps.org; 'info @edc-seaking.org'; harold.taniguchi@kingcounty.gov;
karen.waiter@muckleshoot. nsn.us; dlewarch@suquamish.nsn.us;
dlathrop@desmoineswa.gov; 'planning@kentwa.gov'; mike.bulzomi@soundtransit.org;
'jason.tesdal@centurylink.com'; 'customerservice@wdlll.com';
'tvaslet@piercetransit.org'
Subject: Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Repair
Attachments: 20171018145929.pdf; 20171019084656.pdf
Attached is a SEPA Checklist and DNS for the above -mentioned project in the City of Federal Way. The Senior Planner
for the project, Dave Van de Weghe, can be reached at david.vandeweghe@cityoffederalway.com or 253-835-2638.
Tamara Fix
Administrative Assistant
Federal Way
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
Phone:253/835-2602 Fax: 253/835-2609
www.citvoffederalway.com
Tamara Fix
From: Linda Mills <Imills@kentreporter.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 2:26 PM
To: Tamara Fix
Subject: Re: Lakota Park DNS
Attachments: 1986177.PDF
HI Tamara,
I have received your notice (re: DNS Lakota Park) to be published in the Federal Way Mirror on Friday,
October 20, 2017. A copy of the notice is attached.
Thank you,
Linda
1986177
Linda Mills
Legal/Public Notice Advertising - Obituary Representative
Auburn, Bellevue, Bothell/Kenmore, Covington/Maple Valley/Black Diamond, Issaquah/Sammamish,Kent, Kirkland, Mercer Island, Redmond
and Renton Reporters,
Federal Way Mirror, Snoqualmie Valley Record, and Okanogan Valley Gazette -Tribune
Direct:253-234-3506 Internal:36027 Fax:253-437-6016
19426 68th Ave. S., Ste A, Kent, WA 98032
Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit Sound Info
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Tamara Fix <Tamara.Fix cnr,citvofFedera{�va .comma wrote:
Please publish the attached legal notice (Lakota Park DNS, 17-104389) in Friday's (Oct. 20, 2017) issue.
Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication.
Thanks!
i
CITY OF��.=
Federal Way
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) NOTICE
Lakota Park Stormwater Facility Repair
File No: 17-104389-00-SE
Proposal: Repair the Lakota Park berm and
replace 470 lineal feet of the facility's
outlet pipe within a wetland buffer.
Proponent: Fei Tang
City of Federal Way, PW/SWM
33325 8th Ave S.,
Federal Way, WA 98003
Location: Lakota Park
1415 SW 314" St.
Federal Way, WA 98023
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
Staff Contact: Senior Planner Dave Van De Weghe
253-835-2638
SITE
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal
Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and
regulations. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the City will not act on this proposal for 14 days after the
issuance. Any person may submit written comments within this 14-day period ending at, 5:00 p.m.,
November 3, 2017.
Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above 14-day timeline.
Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file a written appeal with the Federal Way
City Clerk no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 24, 2017, stating the reason for the appeal of the
determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Responsible Official: Brian Davis
Title: Director of Community Development
Address: 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Phone: 253-835-2601
Published in the Federal Way Mirror, October 20, 2017.
17-104389-00-SE Doc. CD. 79184
_.v
DASH PT RD
,N 296
SE 15,
I:1<
4
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. REMOVE UNSUITABLE ORGANIC MATERIAL
2. SCARIFY TOP 6. OF EXISTING BERM MATERIAL
3. INSTALL LOW PERMEABILITY FILL MATERIALTO
ELEVATION OF 256..2 FT LIFT SHALL NOT EXCEED
61NCHES IN DEPTH BEFORE COMPACTION
COMPACT TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY,
WITHIN 2%POINTS OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE
CONTENT, ONLY NON -VIBRATORY COMPACTION
EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED.
4 INSTALL 31NCHES IN DEPTH OF CSTC ON TOP OF
BERM THROUGHOUT ENTIRE BERM LENGTH
5 SEED PARK SIDE OF BERM PROTECT SLOPE
WITH STRAW BLANKET
6 INSTALL FENCE AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURE
WITH A BREAK AWAY SECTION
7 LOW PERMEABILITY MATERIAL APPROX
• - - � 2000 CY, CSTC APPROX OX 7676 CY
WETLAh
50 50 I UO
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
1-6
N.
a �
RBA: 25B 24 _. ..
` { ` 1+50.00 2+00.00 2+50.00 ---- ^ ,
44.. 00.00 =
k
p.00 L. OO 3+ ;,�+50.004 .00 x4+5000 5+00.00 5+5000 _6.ft� i ,-7-6p_00 8+0000 8+50.00��'��.av t_ +
6. % '2 I00.- 13 5008+70.80
�r :il_ ` ` ���'__t_ _ � �- �`.._ �. �... �.7 �— Imo_ .�-, '•: � �� ��
•`� 7 � o� \ y� �1i00.gg Is•5a'.da� Z�.� ` �
WETLAND BOUNDARY
r
m
Z
��-1
w
0+00
Mp I NTENANCE
ti\ BERM Lm STA: 4+30 2wm
J•'-� 5 _ =/' i '20M
23000 _-'o
ort-
i
w
1+00
4k CITY OF 4't�
Federal Way
w
W
2+00
3+00
HORIZ SCALE S,=50,
VERT SCALE I� 5
DATE JAN 2004
DRAWN AVR
DESIGNED : GLG
CHECKED i1MM
w
4+00
w
5+00
w
6+00
DESCRIPTION
BERM @ STA: W77
BERM ? STA: 11+75
2MW---
- - - -mm
27OW---
---- ---- --zm.
e moao----------
--gym
�, mom-----
-----------zeoao
MW--
.. ._ .-Moo
zip Do
24GM-
o to
oWe
-20
-to o to
Oe�
N
—6—
W _ _
7+00 5+00 9+00 10+00 11+00
BERM REPAIR
PLAN AND PROFILE
12+00 13+00
- EXISTING TOP OF BERM GRADE
— 200
-255
_-f CEIVE®
13+71
SEP 12 2017ry OF FEDERAL ,'
CQ M1 UIYI I T DE �rp�
FEDERAL WAY FILE
LAKOTA PARK STORMWATER FACILITY REPAIR PROJECT
SHEET
1
OF
z
WETLAND BOUNDARY 51 100
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
x
z
REPLACE VVrr" I c-
z
>
CM, EXISTING STORM MANHOLE
CBM. EXISTING STORM MANHOLE STA 5+47 39 OFF 0 01 L
STA 4o" U OFF 010 R GRATE EL =2 �li
GRATE EL 00 EXISTING GRADE
2.16
-7—
REPLACE vvrrf4 ilr CIA CpV
m
m
<
>
i
0
z
k
240-
0+00 HORIZ SCALE 1
VERT SCALE NONE
4A DATE - JAN 2004
CITY OF
jj=U DRAIN AVIR
PC DESIGNED : GLG
FE-216W(WN)
1+00
2+00
3+00
DESCRIPTION
4+00
5+00
PIPE REPLACEMENT
PLAN AND PROFILE
E."59DOrRi
5+82
FEDERAL WAY FILE
LAKOTA PARK STORMWATER FACILITY REPAIR PROJECT SHEET
2
OF
2
6