The URL can be used to link to this page

02-15-2023 Planning Commission Agenda Packet PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA City Hall – Council Chambers February 15, 2023 – 6:00 p.m. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Planning Commission Meeting of January 18, 2023 4. PUBLIC COMMENT 5. COMMISSION BUSINESS Annual Comprehensive Plan Selection 2023 Transportation Chapter ADU 6. STAFF BUSINESS Manager’s Report 7. NEXT MEETING March 1, 2023 - TBD 8. ADJOURNMENT Planning Commission meetings are held in-person. To request accommodation to attend or to provide public comment virtually, please contact Anna Lieck at 253-835-2601 or anna.lieck@cityoffederalway.com, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 17, 2022. Commissioners City Staff Lawson Bronson, Chair Keith Niven, Planning Manager Vickie Chynoweth, Vice Chair Anna Lieck, Admin Assistant II Diana Noble-Gulliford www.cityoffederalway.com Tom Medhurst 253-835-2601 Tim O’Neil Anna Patrick Jae So Hope Elder, Alternate Page 1 of 166 Planning Commission Minutes January 18, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City Hall – Council Chambers January 18, 2023 – 6:00 p.m. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Chair Bronson called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Diana Noble-Gulliford, Lawson Bronson, Tom Medhurst, Anna Patrick, Vickie Chenoweth, Tim O’Neil, Jae So City Staff Present: Planning Manager Keith Niven, City Attorney Kent van Alstyne, Senior Planner Chaney Skadsen, and Admin Assistant II Anna Lieck. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT No public comment. 4. COMMISSION BUSINESS December 7th and December 14th minutes are approved as written. Housing Action Plan Implementation Grant – Gap Analysis Briefing presented by Doug Larkson, Tyson Harriett, James Stanton from Heartland, LLC. Commissioner O’Neil inquired how much of the study are is owned by the city and whether or not the current code is driving down the price of land. Mr. Niven provided some insig ht that has been received from developers and comp information for real estate values. Mr. Larkson clarified that the code is inhibiting development for apartments. He suggests advocating with developers and consequent conversations. Commissioner Patrick had questions and comments regarding school impact fees and property taxes for student needs. Mr. Larkson stated LITC (Low Income Tax Credit) can provide funding to build affordable projects up to 60% of area median income. He also pointed out that most of the units proposed with future projects are studio or 1-2 unit apartments. Commissioner Patrick also inquired about ground floor retail options for future developments to ensure tax revenue is returned to the city. Mr. Niven pointed out that Amazon is currently one of the city’s highest tax revenue generators. Commissioner Medhurst asked how the consultants would monetize three changes in the current code for the most impactful results and what would those changes would be. Consultant Tyson Harriett responded that the most impactful change would be a ground floor retail requirement, followed by parking and inclusionary housing. Commissioner Medhurst had follow up questions regarding stormwater. Commissioner Diana Noble-Gulliford asked the consultants for their opinion on how much of an impact the Sound Transit station would have on the downtown development. Mr. Larkson stated that he has observed other stations that have been developed but additional housing has not. He also stated that a transit station could something that future developers might see Page 2 of 166 Planning Commission Minutes January 18, 2023 it as an appeal, but as a standalone feature it might not be a destination itself. Commissioner Bronson requested a chart for abbreviations for the study. Commissioner O’Neil asked questions regarding code changes implemented by Bothell and how can they be followed here. Mr. Larkson gave some insight on the appeal for developers once a project has been started instead of “being the first at the party”. Mr. Niven gave insight on how the redeveloped walkable land was acquired by Bothell (the redirection of a surplus right of way from WSDOT and repurposed the area). 5. MANAGER REPORT Mr. Niven presented a report from the January 17th City Council Meeting. Planner Chaney Skasden gave an update regarding previous questions on which city owned properties are around the upcoming substation. Several Commissioners had questions regarding the schedule for draft code amendments. Commissioner Medhurst pointed out that chair positions should be appointed for the new year and nominated Commissioner Bronson as chair. Commissioner O’Neil seconded the motion and all were in favor. Commissioner Patrick nominated Commissioner Chenowyth for vice chair. Commissioner Noble-Gulliford seconded the nomination and all were in favor. 6. NEXT MEETING February 1st , 2023- Potential update on transport chapter. 7. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Bronson moved that the meeting be adjourned. Commissioner Medhurst seconded. Meeting adjourned at 7:58pm. ATTEST: APPROVED BY COMMISSION: _______________________________________ ______________________ ANNA LIECK, ADMIN ASSISTANT II DATE Page 3 of 166 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor MEMORANDUM DATE: 6 February 2023 TO: Federal Way Planning Commission FROM: Keith Niven, Director SUBJECT: Briefing Memo – City Center Map & Code Changes POLICY QUESTION Should the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment be placed on the docket for further review by staff and consideration by the City Council? BACKGROUND The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) text and map on an annual basis. Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.050(1), prior to City Council review, the Planning Commission shall review the docket at a public meeting and shall forward a recommendation to the City Council on the prioritized docket. Per FWRC 19.80.050(3), city- initiated amendments of the Comprehensive Plan shall be reviewed concurrently with docketed proposals. REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080(1), prior to adopting any docketed proposals, the Planning Commission shall hold a public meeting and will recommend to the City Council those docketed proposals it wishes to further consider for adoption and for staff to research and evaluate further. As part of the 2023 Annul Comprehensive Plan Amendments, the City has proposed amendments to the area designated as City Center Core. These proposed amendments are summarized below: 1. Goals & Policies Changes to existing Comprehensive Plan Goals & Policies are contained in Attachment 1. The proposed amendments reflect the planning and evolution of the City Center and downtown that have happened over the past year and reflect conversations staff have had with the community. 2. Map & Code The proposed code amendments are contained in Attachment 2. There are a number of proposed amendments that address: a. Adding minimum residential densities (units per acre) and commercial intensities (Floor Area Ratio) b. Adding a requirement for new development to structure parking. Percentages are set by land use and allowing an exception for small (5,000 sf) developments c. Delineating Downtown and creating additional code requirements for Downtown including architectural guidelines. d. Modifying the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps, to add the area bounded by PVR Way on the west, 23rd Avenue S on the east, S 316th St on the south and north of S 314th Street on the north, to the City Center Core from the City Center Frame. Page 4 of 166 Procedural Summary for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Selection Process February 15, 2023 Planning Commission (PC) Meeting – A summary of all amendments will be presented to the PC for a recommendation on which requests should be considered further. March 6, 2023 Land Use & Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting – A summary of amendments and the PC recommendation will be presented to the LUTC. Reason for the Amendment The proposed amendments would modify existing development regulations for the City Center and add properties to the City Center Core designation and zone. The reason for these amendments is to adopt more-urban standards for the City Center. These amendments support the vision for the City Center currently contained in the Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use These proposed amendments are for the City Center Core zone and designation. Surrounding zoning & land use consists of the City Center Frame (CC-F), Community Business (BC), and Multi Family (RM) zones. SELECTION CRITERIA FWRC 19.80.080(2) & (3) contain criteria for selecting amendments for further consideration. Criterion #1 – Whether the same area or issue was studied during the last amendment process and conditions have significantly changed so as to make the requested change within the public interest. Staff Response – There were no City Center amendments that were studied as part of the 2022 annual amendment process. Criterion #2 – Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. Staff Response – The City Center proposed amendment is consistent with the vision for City Center in the Comprehensive Plan. Criterion #3 – Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the planning goals of the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.020. Staff Response – The City Center proposed amendments support urban growth, reduce sprawl, encourage economic development and the construction of new housing. Criterion #4 – In the case of text amendments or other amendments to goals and policies, whether the request benefits the city as a whole versus a selected group. Staff Response –The proposed text amendments and amendments to the goals and policies benefit the city as a whole in that they will better direct new development toward consistency with the vision for the City Center. Per FWRC 19.80.080(3), if the request meets the criteria set forth above, it shall be further evaluated according to the following criteria: Criterion #5 – Whether the proposed amendment can be incorporated into planned or active projects. Staff Response – The City Center proposed amendment is believed to be time sensitive and should not be delayed until next year’s periodic update of the Comprehensive Plan. Page 5 of 166 Criterion #6 – Whether the proposal can be reasonably reviewed as part of the annual amendment process and the city has staffing resources available to accomplish such review. Staff Response –The City Center proposed amendment can be reasonably reviewed as part of the annual amendment process. Criterion #7 – Volume of requests received. A large volume of requests may necessitate that some requests be reviewed in a subsequent year. Staff Response – The City Center proposed amendment can be reviewed in the current update process. Criterion #8 – Order of requests received. Staff Response – The city Center proposed amendment is a city-initiated amendment. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080(1), prior to adopting any docketed proposals, the Planning Commission shall hold a public meeting and will recommend to the City Council those docketed proposals it wishes to further consider for adoption and for staff to research and evaluate further. 1. The Planning Commission forwards the recommendation to the Land Use and Transportation Committee and full Council as follows: City Center proposed Amendments: a) ____ That the request moves forward for further consideration. b) ____That the request does not move forward for further consideration. NEXT STEPS Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080(4) & (5), based on the Planning Commission’s review of the docketed proposals according to the selection criteria and the recommendation provided, the Council shall determine which docketed proposals will be further considered, and shall forward those selected proposals to the Planning Commission for its further review and recommendation to Council. The Council’s decision to consider a docketed proposal shall not constitute a decision or recommendation that the proposal should be adopted nor does it preclude later Council action to add or delete an amendment for consideration. Page 6 of 166 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 166 Page 8 of 166 Page 9 of 166 Page 10 of 166 Page 11 of 166 Page 12 of 166 Page 13 of 166 Page 14 of 166 Attachment 2 Page 15 of 166 Page 16 of 166 Page 17 of 166 Page 18 of 166 Page 19 of 166 Page 20 of 166 Page 21 of 166 Page 22 of 166 Page 23 of 166 Page 24 of 166 Page 25 of 166 Page 26 of 166 Page 27 of 166 Page 28 of 166 Page 29 of 166 Page 30 of 166 Page 31 of 166 Page 32 of 166 Page 33 of 166 Page 34 of 166 Page 35 of 166 Page 36 of 166 Page 37 of 166 Page 38 of 166 Page 39 of 166 Page 40 of 166 Page 41 of 166 Page 42 of 166 Page 43 of 166 Page 44 of 166 Page 45 of 166 Page 46 of 166 Page 47 of 166 Page 48 of 166 Page 49 of 166 Page 50 of 166 Page 51 of 166 Page 52 of 166 Page 53 of 166 Page 54 of 166 Page 55 of 166 Page 56 of 166 Page 57 of 166 Page 58 of 166 Page 59 of 166 Page 60 of 166 Page 61 of 166 Page 62 of 166 Page 63 of 166 Page 64 of 166 Page 65 of 166 Page 66 of 166 Page 67 of 166 Page 68 of 166 Page 69 of 166 Page 70 of 166 Page 71 of 166 Page 72 of 166 Page 73 of 166 Page 74 of 166 Page 75 of 166 Page 76 of 166 Page 77 of 166 Page 78 of 166 Page 79 of 166 Page 80 of 166 Page 81 of 166 Page 82 of 166 Page 83 of 166 Page 84 of 166 Page 85 of 166 Page 86 of 166 Page 87 of 166 Page 88 of 166 Page 89 of 166 Page 90 of 166 Page 91 of 166 Page 92 of 166 Page 93 of 166 Page 94 of 166 Page 95 of 166 Page 96 of 166 Page 97 of 166 Page 98 of 166 Page 99 of 166 Page 100 of 166 Page 101 of 166 Page 102 of 166 Page 103 of 166 Page 104 of 166 Page 105 of 166 Page 106 of 166 Page 107 of 166 Page 108 of 166 Page 109 of 166 Page 110 of 166 Page 111 of 166 Page 112 of 166 Page 113 of 166 Page 114 of 166 Page 115 of 166 Page 116 of 166 Page 117 of 166 Page 118 of 166 Page 119 of 166 Page 120 of 166 Page 121 of 166 Page 122 of 166 Page 123 of 166 Page 124 of 166 1 MEMORANDUM Community Development Department DATE: February 15, 2023 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Stacey Welsh, Principal Planner Keith Niven, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Selection Process – 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Kitts Corner POLICY QUESTION Should the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment be placed on the docket for further review by staff and consideration by the City Council? BACKGROUND The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) text and map on an annual basis. Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.050(1), prior to City Council review, the Planning Commission shall review the docket at a public meeting and shall forward a recommendation to the City Council on the prioritized docket. Per FWRC 19.80.050(3), city-initiated amendments of the Comprehensive Plan shall be reviewed concurrently with docketed proposals. REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080(1), prior to adopting any docketed proposals, the Planning Commission shall hold a public meeting and will recommend to the City Council those docketed proposals it wishes to further consider for adoption and for staff to research and evaluate further. Procedural Summary for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Selection Process February 15, 2023 Planning Commission (PC) Meeting – A summary of all amendments will be presented to the PC for a recommendation on which requests should be considered further. March 6, 2023 Land Use & Transportation Committee (LUTC) Meeting – A summary of amendments and the PC recommendation will be presented to the LUTC. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT The following Comprehensive Plan amendment is requested by the Community Development Department. A. Kitts Corner: 1. Summary Page 125 of 166 2 File Number: 23-100399-UP Parcel Number: 202104-9001, -9004, -9069, -9072, -9080, -9086, & -9090 Address: 33601, 33901, 33903 & 33905 Pacific Hwy South Location: At the SW corner of the intersection of S. 336th St. and Pacific Hwy S. Size: 22.78 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Existing Comp Plan: Community Business* Existing Zoning: Community Business (BC*) Proposed Comp Plan: Community Business Proposed Zoning: Community Business (BC) 2. Reason for the Amendment The amendment would modify a prior Use Process VI Comprehensive Plan and Rezone decision that placed conditions on the properties pertaining to future development. Over the years, the city has met with prospective developers looking to develop the remaining Kitts Corner properties. These various entities have found the conditions, in particular ones that specify sizes of building footprints, difficult to implement. Specific condition modifications are to be determined. The city is initiating this amendment as there is a proponent interested in entering into a site plan review and Development Agreement process. Should this amendment proceed through selection, then staff will await City Council direction on whether to commence the Development Agreement process. 3. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use Zoning Land Use North Community Business (BC) S. 336th St. with retail & office uses beyond South Commercial Enterprise (CE) Retail & office use East Community Business (BC) Pacific Hwy S. with retail, office and church uses beyond West Multifamily Residential (RM 2400) Multifamily residential SELECTION CRITERIA FWRC 19.80.080(2) & (3) contain criteria for selecting amendments for further consideration. Criterion #1 – Whether the same area or issue was studied during the last amendment process and conditions have significantly changed so as to make the requested change within the public interest. Response – The Kitts amendment was not studied during the last amendment process. Criterion #2 – Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. Response – The Kitts amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the Comprehensive Plan, with its potential to facilitate additional housing and jobs near Pacific Hwy South. Page 126 of 166 3 Criterion #3 – Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the planning goals of the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.020. Response – The Kitts amendment is consistent with the planning goals of the Growth Management Act (GMA), as it involves development of residential and commercial development within an urban area served by utilities and is required to make provisions for open space and protection of the environment. Future site development is also subject to adopted codes and policies which are consistent with the GMA. Criterion #4 – In the case of text amendments or other amendments to goals and policies, whether the request benefits the city as a whole versus a selected group. Response –The Kitts amendment does not involve text amendments or amendments to goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Per FWRC 19.80.080(3), if the request meets the criteria set forth above, it shall be further evaluated according to the following criteria: Criterion #5 – Whether the proposed amendment can be incorporated into planned or active projects. Response – The Kitts amendment is not located in or near any other planning activities currently underway in the city. Criterion #6 – Whether the proposal can be reasonably reviewed as part of the annual amendment process and the city has staffing resources available to accomplish such review. Response –The Kitts amendment can be reasonably reviewed as part of the annual amendment process; special studies will be completed by the developer. Criterion #7 – Volume of requests received. A large volume of requests may necessitate that some requests be reviewed in a subsequent year. Response – The Kitts amendment can be reviewed in the current update process. Criterion #8 – Order of requests received. Response – The Kitts amendment is a city initiated amendment. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080(1), prior to adopting any docketed proposals, the Planning Commission shall hold a public meeting and will recommend to the City Council those docketed proposals it wishes to further consider for adoption and for staff to research and evaluate further. 1. The Planning Commission forwards the recommendation to the Land Use and Transportation Committee and full Council as follows: Kitts Corner a) ____ That the request moves forward for further consideration. Page 127 of 166 4 b) ____ That the request does not move forward for further consideration. NEXT STEPS Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080(4) & (5), based on the Planning Commission’s review of the docketed proposals according to the selection criteria and the recommendation provided, the Council shall determine which docketed proposals will be further considered, and shall forward those selected proposals to the Planning Commission for its further review and recommendation to Council. The Council’s decision to consider a docketed proposal shall not constitute a decision or recommendation that the proposal should be adopted nor does it preclude later Council action to add or delete an amendment for consideration. LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Aerial Map – Kitts Property Exhibit 2 Email from Curtis Nelson to Stacey Welsh, dated 2-3-23 Page 128 of 166 S 333RD ST 18TH AV SPACIFIC HWY SS 344TH ST9THAVS S 344TH ST S 336TH ST 18TH PL S18TH PL SS 336TH ST13TH PL S9TH AV SPACIFIC HWY S9THAVS8THAVS 9 T H A V S S 336TH ST 10TH PL S9TH AV S16TH AV S16TH AV SPACIFIC HWY SS344THST S 344TH ST S 333RD ST S 344TH ST S 341ST PL S 341ST PL ColumbiaBank Sterling Savings GranvilleCourt ABAM Multi-ServiceCenter PublicHealthCenter The Cedars ParkwayCenter Pattison's Sunrise Self Storage Forum II Forum I Orion Westhill Omni Bldg. Samolux CampusPark CampusPark HealthSouth ForestPark SmithBarney TrinityBroadcasting PacificFlowers PacificCoastFord SeacomaVillage 9th AvenuePavillion 9th Avenue Center Mesto Red CanoeCredit Union Spectrum Business Park Cash &Carry PacificaOffice Bldg. ChristianFaith Center Frito Lay Progressive BC BC RM2400* CE CE BC OP CE OP OP CE RM2400*RM3600BC CE CE BC BC RM3600 RM3600 RM3600 RM1800 CE CE CE CE BC* OP BC CE CE RM2400 OP OP RM3600 RM3600* CE RM3600 City of Federal Way 2023 This map is accompanied by no warranties, and is simply a graphic representation. Kitts Property Exhibit #1 Legend Site Streams (City Survey) Wetlands (1998 City Survey) Zoning Boundary* Note: An asterisk (*) next to a zoning designation indicates the property isgoverned by a development agreement. J:\complan\SiteSpecificRequests\2023\ssr_aerial_KittsProperty.mxd 0 500250 Feet´ Page 129 of 166 1 Stacey Welsh From:Curt Nelson <curt@wirbinc.com> Sent:Friday, February 3, 2023 11:32 AM To:Stacey Welsh Subject:Kitts Corner Attachments:doc04055420230203111634.pdf [EXTERNAL EMAIL WARNING] This email originated from outside of the City of Federal Way and may not be trustworthy. Please use caution when clicking links, opening attachments, or replying to requests for information. If you have any doubts about the validity of this email please contact IT Help Desk at x2555. Hi Stacey, Here are the parcel numbers on the three properties we have in the Kitts corner area. We would like the property located at 34010 Pacific Highway South to be included in the process of bringing it back to Community Business (BC) zoning as well. The other two properties should have been exempt from the Kitts corner original plans. I believe they were grandfathered in. Let me know what steps we need to do next. Thanks Curtis E. Curtis Nelson Spokane Office, WIRB, Inc Cell: 509-995-5965 Main Office: 509-279-2558 Fax: 509-863-9698 curt@wirbinc.com Visit us at: www.wirbinc.com The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Attention: The information contained in this email message may be privileged and is confidential information intended only for the use of the recipient, or any employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient. Any unauthorized use, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original message and all attachments from your electronic files. Page 130 of 166 Page 131 of 166 Page 132 of 166 Page 133 of 166 Planning Commission Public Meeting Meeting Date: February 15, 2023 Selection Process – Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 5 DATE: February 15, 2023 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Keith Niven, Community Development Director Natalie Kamieniecki, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Selection Process – 2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments MEETING DATE: February 15, 2023 I. POLICY QUESTION Should the Lee Property citizen-initiated site-specific request for comprehensive plan amendment move forward for further review? II. BACKGROUND The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) requires the city to accept applications for amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) text and map on an annual basis. Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080, after the September 30th deadline for accepting applications and following an LUTC recommendation, the City Council shall hold a public hearing and select those docketed amendment requests it wishes to move to the Planning Commission for further consideration. III. REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Prior to city council review, the planning commission shall review the docket at a public meeting and shall forward a recommendation to the city council on the prioritized docket. Pursuant to FWRC 19.08.050, Process VI, “Council Rezones,” the City Council is required to review all requests concurrently during a public hearing at which time the council selects those amendment requests it wishes staff to research further. IV. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT SELECTION PROCESS February 15, 2023 Planning Commission recommendation to City Council on docketed proposals for further evaluation. Page 134 of 166 Planning Commission Public Meeting Meeting Date: February 15, 2023 Selection Process – Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 2 of 5 March 6, 2023 LUTC Public Meeting – Provide recommendation to City Council on which requests should move forward for further review. March 21, 2023 City Council Selection of Comprehensive Plan amendments for further evaluation and review. V. BACKGROUND AND STAFF ANALYSIS – SITE-SPECIFIC REQUESTS A. Site-Specific Request – Lee Properties 1. Summary File Number: 22-104461-UP Parcel No.: 082104-9167, -9076, -9074 Applicant: James K Lee Owner: James K Lee Address: 31200, 31001, 30901- 1st Avenue S Location: North of S 312th Street, east of 1st Ave S. Size: 4.03 Acres (ft.) Existing Land Use: Vacant Existing Comprehensive Plan: Single Family High Density Residential Existing Zoning: Single Family (RS 7.2, one unit per 15,000 square feet) Requested Comprehensive Plan: Residential Multi-Family Requested Zoning: Multi-Family (RM 1800 one unit per 1,800 square feet) 2. Reason for the Request Mr. Lee is requesting higher density zone classification to develop residential units that support population increases projected within the city. The applicant has sited FWCP Chapter 2.3, Figure II-3, Population Projection, in support the requested rezone. Development of the site will deter frequent trespassing on site and improve neighborhood conditions overall with development and occupancy of the site. 3. Staff Comments The parcels are bordered on the west by 1th Ave S and on the east by S 314th Street both classified as minor arterial roadways. Water and sewer services are available for the subject parcels. The site is immediately adjacent to single family dwellings to the north and west of the project site. Parcels to the west, across 1th Avenue S, are developed with Single Family dwellings and neighborhood business uses at the intersection of 1st Ave S and S 314th ST. The parcel adjacent to the south is developed with multi-family residential units, Greystone Meadows Apartments. Redesignating the requested parcels to Multi-Family Residential (RM 1800, one unit per 1,800) would be consistent with the existing multi-family development to the south. Page 135 of 166 Planning Commission Public Meeting Meeting Date: February 15, 2023 Selection Process – Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 3 of 5 Critical Areas There is a small wetland mapped on Parcel No. 082104 9167, the southernmost of the three parcels. Regardless of the zoning. if development is proposed in the vicinity of the wetland, a Critical Areas Report, which delineates the wetland boundary and determines its rating, must be prepared. The majority of the parcel is located in a five-year capture zone. A five-year capture zone represents the time it takes spills within the land area overlaying the five-year capture zone to travel to any public water source well owned by Lakehaven Water and Sewer District, excluding the land area contained in the six-month or one-year capture zones. At the time of development, the proponent must fill out A Hazardous Materials Statement 4. Surrounding Zoning & Land Use Zoning Land Use North Single Family (RS 7.2, one unit per 7,200 square feet) Single family dwelling South Multi-Family (RM2400, one unit per 2,400 square feet) Apartments East Single Family (RS 7.2, one unit per 7,200 square feet) Single family dwelling West Single Family (RS 7.2, one unit per 7,200 square feet), Neighborhood Business (BN) at intersection of 1st Avenue S and S 314th ST Single family dwellings, convenience store and pizza restaurant VI. SELECTION CRITERIA FWRC 19.80.080 contains criteria for selecting amendments for further consideration. A. Criterion #1 – Whether the same area or issue was studied during the last amendment process and conditions in the immediate vicinity have significantly changed so as to make the requested change within the public interest. Response to Criterion #1 – This request was initially selected for further review during the 2022 amendment cycle, however; the request was withdrawn. The subject properties were rezoned from Neighborhood Business (BN) to residential Single Family (RS7.2) in 2018 (Ord. 18-843). B. Criterion #2 – The proposed amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the comprehensive plan. Page 136 of 166 Planning Commission Public Meeting Meeting Date: February 15, 2023 Selection Process – Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 4 of 5 Response to Criterion #2 – There is high demand for housing opportunity in the City of Federal Way and region generally. According to the comprehensive plan, “The multi-family residential land use designation represents an opportunity to provide a range of housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth. The increase in population, aging population, increasing diversity, decline in average family size, and high cost of single-family homes have created heavy demand for new housing types. The Land Use chapter encourages the development of housing types, such as duplexes, townhouses, senior housing, quality apartment units and condominiums in existing multifamily areas and within mixed-use development in commercial areas” (pg. II-12). The site’s close proximity to transit further supports the requested zoning, as the comprehensive plan states “the overarching goal of VISION 2040 related to land use is to focus growth within already urbanized areas to create walkable, compact, and transit-oriented communities that maintain unique local character” (pg. II-3). C. Criterion #3 – Whether the proposed amendment meets the existing state and local laws, including the GMA. Response to Criterion #3 – The requested amendment would not be in conflict with local or state laws if subsequent development of the parcels are in compliance with local and state regulations, including and not limited to the FWRC and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). D. Criterion #4 – In the case of text amendments, or other amendments to goals or policies, whether the request benefits the city as a whole versus a selected group. Response to Criterion #4 – The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Rezone requested for the Lee properties does not include text amendments. If the request meets the criteria set forth in subsections above, it shall be further evaluated according to the following criteria: E. Criterion #1 – Whether the proposed amendment can be incorporated into planned or active projects. Response to Criterion #1 – Staff has the capacity to review the proposal and is supported by application fees. F. Criterion #2 – Amount of analysis necessary to reach a recommendation on the request. If a large-scale study is required, a request may have to be delayed until the following year due to workload, staffing levels, etc. Response to Criterion #2 – The request does not require a large-scale study. G. Criterion #3 – Volume of requests received. A large volume of requests may necessitate that some requests be reviewed in a subsequent year. Response to Criterion #3 – The submitted amendment can be accommodated in the normal review process. Page 137 of 166 Planning Commission Public Meeting Meeting Date: February 15, 2023 Selection Process – Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 5 of 5 H. Criterion #4 – Order of requests received. Response to Criterion #4 – The requests were received in the following order: 1. Lee Property 2. City Center and Downtown 3. Kitts Corner VII. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 1. Pursuant to FWRC 19.80.080 - The Planning Commission forwards the recommendation to the Land Use and Transportation Committee and full Council as follows: Lee Property a) ____ That the request go forward for further consideration. b) ____ That the request not go forward for further consideration. VIII. LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Comprehensive Plan & Rezone Map Exhibit B Aerial Photo Exhibit C Public Comment - Jim and Ramona High Exhibit D Public Comment - Judy Robinson Exhibit E Public Comment - Harold Geno Exhibit F - Public Comment - Myron Kanikkeberg Page 138 of 166 10831210 31218 31201 348 350 400 310 190 328 32031190 31182 31174 311663114231130 31118 311103104031010 101127117 31090 31076 31054 3150031500 132 140 118 112104 112 31200 31001 357351 31155 31174 31148 153139 132148164186202 181 19518716914112931057 31075 31093 31099 215 31123 31103 31177 31202 134 130 124 203 317 321 325 329 341335 226 230 30904 30900 31046 31024 118 31004 108 125 133141 30901 116 13014416618019220031003 31027 31045 Lee Property Comprehensive Plan and Rezone Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community, County of King, Bureau of Land Management, Esri, HERE, Garmin, GeoTechnologies, Inc., USGS, EPA 2/8/2023, 10:17:19 AM 0 0.06 0.110.03 mi 0 0.09 0.170.04 km 1:4,812 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS County of King, Bureau of Land Management, Esri, HERE, Garmin, GeoTechnologies, Inc., USGS, EPA | Port of Tacoma Planning Department, Port of Tacoma Real Estate Department | Page 139 of 166 King County Assessor's Office, King County GIS Center, King County, King countyAssessor's Office, King County GIS Center, EagleView Technologies, Inc. King County Date: 2/8/2023 The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to changewithout notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness,or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a survey product. King County shall not be liablefor any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profitsresulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map isprohibited except by written permission of King County.± Page 140 of 166 Page 141 of 166 Page 142 of 166 Page 143 of 166 Page 144 of 166 Page 145 of 166 1 Anna Lieck From:Gladys Patterson <gladysgpatterson@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, February 12, 2023 2:53 PM To:Anna Lieck Subject:02/15/23 Planning Commission Meeting Public Comments Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged [EXTERNAL EMAIL WARNING] This email originated from outside of the City of Federal Way and may not be trustworthy. Please use caution when clicking links, opening attachments, or replying to requests for information. If you have any doubts about the validity of this email please contact IT Help Desk at x2555. I am unable to attend the meeting, but would like my objection included in the public comments. Thank you. Back in February of 2022, we submitted our opposition to the rezoning of the Lee Property. This issue appears to be back on the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting on 2/15/2023. Our position on this re‐zone has not changed since last year. The properties were zoned for single family homes and should remain zoned as such for many, many reasons. Parkwood Campus was a "planned community" back in 1979. The city did an excellent job in the planning of this community, including the impact on protected wetland that our homes are next to. There is a "Native Growth Protection Easement" included in the Plat Mat as well as our Deed of Trust. Protection of the plant and animal habitat was included in the planning of this community. In fact, our property has an additional easement for water run off to the wetland behind our home. The wetland is owned by the City of Federal Way and is included in the Critical Area Map of Federal Way. Protection of the Wetland is included in the Federal Way Ordinances. Please see Federal Way Ordinance 91‐123 which specifically addresses the impact on the loss of wetlands to our community. Plat Map recorded 1/12/79 7901120596 is the Parkwood Campus Plat Map. Although the Lee's property is not immediately next to the protected Wetland, the impact of a multi‐ housing development would be disastrous to the habitat wildlife that live there as well as to the habitat itself. Water run off would now go into the sewer system instead of the the wetland. The additional people and traffic would negatively affect this wetland and native growth that we are supposed to protect. Because our home is directly next to the wetland, we get a close up view of the inhabitants. From multiple bird species, to dragonflies, and butterflies, it is also the home to squirrels, possums, and the occasional peskie raccoon. I'm sure that doesn't come close to listed all the inhabitants, but I think you get my point. We need to protect not only our way of life, but the lives of the creatures who live next to us. I was not quite understanding why Mr. Lee would make another request to rezone so soon after his first request was denied, so I did a little research on the Internet. It appears that Mr. Lee purchased the property in 2018. At that time he was the owner Of Lee Construction LLC. Per DOR records, he is the current owner of Lee Eagles Lair LLC which is a commercial multi unit apartment complex. So this would not be the first time that Mr. Lee purchased property with the 2 intent to build apartments. This was his only intent from the beginning, even though he knew it was zoned for single family homes. It certainly wasn't for him to build a home. He owns a home in Mercer Island valued at almost 2 million dollars per the King County Records Office. Our community and our way of life should not be lost due to financial greed. Most of the residents at Parkwood Campus have lived here for a very long time. Mr. Lee's financial ambitions should not be directed at our community. He certainly could build a few single family homes and make a profit, but I'm sure that would not be enough financial gain for him or he would have already done so. Please do not let financial profit take priority over our community. Deny Mr. Lee's request to rezone. Forested Area NE of 1st Ave S and S 312 St. Mr. ad Mrs. Alfred Patterson 30836 2nd Ave S Federal Way WA 98003 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 15, 2023 TO: Federal Way Planning Commission FROM: Evan Lewis, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Transportation & Mobility Chapter Briefing – Federal Way Comprehensive Plan 2024 Update BRIEFING OBJECTIVE 1) Review initial and noteworthy updates to Transportation & Mobility Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan including updated format, vision, and goals and policies 2) Provide an update on travel model and associated land use assumptions 3) Review next steps and chapter update schedule BACKGROUND The city is updating the Transportation & Mobility Chapter of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan with a horizon year of 2044. This is an early briefing to provide an overview of the chapter update with the Planning Commission. A complete draft will be ready for the Planning Commission’s review by 2nd quarter of 2024. The Planning Commission may request additional briefings in 2023. The following are the more significant updates proposed at this time: 1) Updated chapter format and organization and content of several goals and policies 2) Updated growth targets incorporated into travel model a. 11,260 new housing units 2019-2044; a 39% increase over previous 2006-2031 target b. 20,460 new jobs 2019-2044; a 66% increase over previous 2006-2031 target 3) Increased emphasis on: a. Multimodal connectivity and access b. Connectivity to mass transit c. Safety improvements to reduce injuries d. Risk management e. Downtown and S Station improvements f. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) g. Consistency with land use chapter h. Transportation system future technology ATTACHMENTS A. Annotated edits to chapter vision, goals and policies B. 2044 jobs/housing growth assumption maps for travel model C. Chapter update schedule (draft) 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Page 146 of 166 T&M - 1 CHAPTER THREE: TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.2 POLICY BACKGROUND 3.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.4 VISION, GOALS & POLICIES 3.4.1: VISION Federal Way’s transportation vision is an aspirational statement that expresses the type of transportation system Federal Way will have by the year 2044 or, in many cases, much earlier. Federal Way envisions a transportation system that serves all users and modes of travel by offering a safe and well-maintained network of walkways, bicycle facilities, intersections, and roadways that conveniently connect residents, workers, and visitors to public transportation, downtown Federal Way, and other major destinations. 3.4.2: GOALS AND POLICIES The following goals further define the vision, while policies express how the goals will be achieved. Goal 1: Maintain and enhance mobility through a safe, balanced, and integrated transportation system. Policies to Achieve Goal 1: TP1.1 Reduce reliance on drive alone trips by prioritizing and implementing supportive local-level transit, high occupancy vehicle (HOV), and non-motorized improvements for pedestrians and bicycles. Commented [EL1]: General disclaimer: Goal and policy numbering format will be updated later. Some numbering left blank (as ‘xx’) due to policies being moved around. Commented [EL2]: Updated Chapter Format: 1) Introduction 2) Policy Background 3) Existing Conditions 4) Vision, Goals & Policies 5) The Layered Network 6) Capital Improvements Plan 7) Financing & Implementation Plan 8) Appendices 2015 Chapter Format (for comparison): 1) Introduction 2) Policy Background 3) Transportation Concept 4) Vision, Goals & Policies 5) Existing Conditions 6) Future Transportation Vision 7) Near & Long-Term Projects 8) Financing & Implementation 9) Maps 10) Appendices Commented [EL3]: Proposed updated transportation vision below in purple Commented [EL4]: For comparison, the current chapter has the following 2 vision-oriented statements: From Section 3.3 of Transportation chapter: It is proposed that the City adopt the following goals and policies with respect to transportation facility improvements that allow it to maintain options into the future, especially with respect to transit enhancements. This may result in a conservative approach to highway improvements that might slow the rate of progress in the area of non-drive alone mode use. From Section 3.5 of the Transportation Chapter: Federal Way envisions a future transportation system that serves all users and modes of travel by offering a safe and robust network of walkways, bicycle facilities, intersections, and roadways. Page 147 of 166 T&M - 2 TP1.2 Develop a transportation system that achieves the following level of service (LOS) metrics: o Signalized Intersection outside of City Center will experience a 1.2 vehicle-to-capacity (v/c) ratio or lower o Unsignalized Intersection outside of City Center will experience a 1.0 vehicle-to-capacity (v/c) ratio or lower o The City Center area will experience an average 1.1 vehicle-to-capacity (v/c) ratio or less. o Facility completeness as described in the following pedestrian, bicycling, and transit priority areas level of service tables. Pedestrian Priority Area Level of Service (LOS) LOS Within Pedestrian Priority Area Network Pedestrian facility as indicated in the Street Design Guidelines Provides a lower-level facility than recommended in the Street Design Guidelines No pedestrian facility provided Bicycle Priority Area Level of Service (LOS) LOS Within Bicycle Priority Area Network Bicycle facility as indicated in Street Design Guidelines Provides a lower-level facility than recommended in the Street Design Guidelines No bicycle facility provided Transit Priority Corridor Level of Service (LOS) LOS Measurement* Pedestrian Access (Optional) Quality of Service (Optional)+ More than 80% of transit stops meet amenity minimum provisions Sidewalks and pedestrian crossing opportunities serving stops All day frequent service; adequate parking at park- and-rides and stations More than 60% of transit stops meet amenity minimum provisions Sidewalks and pedestrian crossing opportunities serving some stops Peak period service; insufficient parking at park-and-rides and stations Less than 60% of transit stops meet amenity minimum provisions General lack of sidewalks and pedestrian crossing opportunities N/A The Street Design Guidelines are provided in Appendix III-A. *Amenities include bus stop shelter, bench, flag post, and/or concrete waiting area; these amenities are determined based on the number of people using a transit stop as defined by a transit agency. +Consider the adequacy of parking provided at park-and-rides and transit stations Commented [EL5]: Through comp plan update it will be determined whether transportation levels of service will be updated; if so the LOS policy below may be updated Commented [EL6]: The color system to identify LOS may be updated to a different system Page 148 of 166 T&M - 3 TP1.3 Identify the improvements and strategies needed to fully implement the City’s Layered Network and meet the level -of -service requirements for transportation. TP1.4 Allow improvements to vehicle throughput only where they enhance traffic and pedestrian safety, improve high capacity transit and HOV facilities, improve bike and pedestrian mobility, or reduce air pollution. TP1.5 Enhance breadth of mobility options using the existing footprint of the roadway and technological advancements. TP1.xx When widening roadways, safety improvements shall be considered and implemented to compensate for added level of stress from additional traffic lanes and/or speeds.”When widening roadways, impacts to non-motorized users and transit vehicles and passengers should be minimized. TP1.6 Employ traffic calming measures in neighborhoods through context sensitive design where traffic volumes and speeds consistently exceed reasonable levels and as set forth in the adopted Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program. TP1.7 Improve safety on residential streets by: o Reducing street widths while maintaining on-street parking. o Increasing separation between sidewalks and streets. o Reducing design speeds to discourage speeding. o Limiting the length of straight streets to discourage speeding. o Traffic calming o Other actions approved by Public Works. TP1.8 Reduce crash rates and extend capacity of major roadways through the uUse of Access Management improvements. to reduce crash rates and extend capacity of major arterials. Commented [EL7]: Previously part of TP1.5 but it’s broken out as a standalone policy Language update from PW Traffic clarifies the intent of this policy Commented [EL8]: Language update (as with many other policy updates) puts the purpose of the policy ahead of the action for achieving it Some more action-oriented policy language may be added and/or moved to a comp plan implementation chapter Page 149 of 166 T&M - 4 TP1.9 Public Works will Ddevelop incident response timing plans for major arterials.roadways. TP1.10 Coordinate with transit agencies to provide convenient non-motorized access to transit facilities. TP1.11 Develop code requirements and a designated truck route system that accommodates the needs of the private sector and residents, and provides a balance between movement needs and quality of life. TP1.12 Discourage the use of road facilities by vehicles carrying hazardous materials and those with weight, size, or other characteristics that would be injurious to people and property in the City. TP1.13 Identify transportation programs and strategies for security and emergency responses. TP1.14 Develop and Mmaintain a Layered Network that provides connectivity and recognizes that not all streets provide the same quality of travel experience. o Classify streets as Freeway, Principal Arterial, Minor Arterial, Principal Collector, Minor Collector, or Local Street. o Ensure that complete street principles are applied in a context-sensitive way Ensure that the Layered Network continues to provide for all varieties of street uses including: regional mobility and cross-town trips; commuting; shopping and recreational travel; property and business access; and parking, regardless of mode. o Maintain a gap analysis identifying substandard facilities or barriers within the active transportation network that may impede safe and effective movement throughout the city. TP1.15 Continue to enhance the City’s Layered Network by using the following methods: Commented [EL9]: Specifying the specific dept. for implementing a policy is more appropriate for implementation chapter Commented [EL10]: This policy has been implemented, thus deleted (as with a few others that have been implemented and not ongoing) Commented [EL11]: Complete streets more concise describes the deleted sub-policy below Page 150 of 166 T&M - 5 o Require dedication of rights-of-way as a condition for development when the need for such rights-of-way is linked to the development or where shown on the Future Roadway Network; o Request donations of rights-of-way to the public; o Purchase rights-of-way in accordance with state laws and procedures; and o Acquire development rights and easements from property owners. TP1.xx Prioritize transportation projects considering concurrency, safety, multimodal enhancements, environmental impacts, and cost effectiveness. TG2 Be fiscally and environmentally sustainable. TG3 Enhance community health, livability, and transportation by providing a connected system of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit ways that are integrated into a coordinated regional network. Goal 2: Enhance community health and, livability, through and pedestrian, bike, and transit transportation improvements that are regionally connected. Policies to Achieve Goal 2: TP2.1 Through subarea planning, with the cooperation of transit service providers, work to make transit part of eachconnect neighborhoods to regional mass transit through appropriate designs and services. , service types, and public involvement. This system should provide convenient connections from city neighborhood activity centers to the regional transportation system. TP2.2 Prepare, promote, and provide for an enhanced, high- capacity, regional transit system by, mmaintaining and enhancing area residents’ mobility and travel options to Commented [EL12]: This policy was moved here from deleted goal 2 since it better relates to Goal 1 Commented [EL13]: Former Goal 2 isn’t specific enough; fiscal and environmental sustainability are aspects of other goals so TG2 policies were allocated under other goals Commented [EL14]: TG3 is now Goal 2, and modified as shown below Commented [EL15]: Goal 2 was formerly Goal 3 Commented [EL16]: For implementation chapter: Right-of- way improvements and transit services that facilitate the efficient and safe movement of people and goods via non-automotive mode choices. Commented [EL17]: Public involvement happening for subarea planning already. The rest of this policy deleted since it’s stated more concisely with the edits proposed/ Commented [EL18]: Possibly add a policy referencing goals from our centers chapters for City Center, S. Station, and Twin Lakes Page 151 of 166 T&M - 6 high capacity transit centers. The regional transit system should assist in attaining air quality standards. TP2.3 Acquire or preserve rights-of-way for high-capacity transit whenever possible, such as development applications, in advance of their need. Make accommodations for any improvements, whether public or private, to provide for future high-capacity transit needs without major redevelopment. TP2.4 Foster phased improvements that expand transit services in time to meet the demand for these services. TP2.5 Work with transit agencies to ensure amenities such as shelters, benches, bicycle racks, lighting, and information kiosks are incorporated in the design and improvement of appropriate transit facilities. TP2.6 Support transit commuter options (e.g., subscription buses, special commuter services, local shuttles). TP2.7 Promote extension of fixed guideway facilities to the regional airport as an effective means of resolving congestion problems that affect City residents and businesses. TP2.8 Encourage non-motorized improvements that minimize the need for residents to use motorized modes by extending the existing non-motorized system and providing: 1. Safe and comfortable Aaccess to activity centers and schools; 2. Linkage to transit, park & ride lots, and school bus networks; 3. Completion of planned pedestrian/jogging or bicycle trails; Commented [EL19]: Deleted by PW Traffic Commented [EL20]: For implementation chapter: possibly real- time information with message boards at high volume locations Commented [EL21]: Underway through Link Page 152 of 166 T&M - 7 4. Designating a network of streets that can safely and efficiently accommodate bicycles; and 5. Extend sidewalks to all streets. TP2.9 Facilitate a safe school walking routes program, and, where possible, make capital budget decisions that support such a system. TP2.10 Provide a one-mile grid of bicycle facilities connecting major activity centers, recreational facilities, and schools. TP2.11 Incorporate pedestrian and bicycle features as design elements in the City Center as reflected in the FWCP Vision and City Center Street Design Guidelines. TP2.12 Include sufficient area in rights-of-way for bike lanes, sidewalks, and landscaped medians to provide separation from motorized traffic and enhance aesthetics. Use landscaped medians to separate opposing traffic when safety and aesthetic purposes dictate the need. TP2.13 Acquire access paths between existing developments, cul- de-sacs, public facilities, business areas, and transit followed by trail construction to improve non-motorized circulation. Require the same for all new developments or redevelopments. TP2.14 Requireing developers to mitigate the impact of the development on the City’s transportation system by constructing bike lanes, trails, and sidewalks where they would interface with the existing system, to the extent allowed by law. TP2.15 Develop access management standards to minimize the number of curb cuts on arterials to improve pedestrian and vehicle safety. TP2.16 Emphasize the enforcement of laws that reduce pedestrian, cyclist, and vehicle conflict. Commented [EL22]: Notes from Traffic staff: Flag the following for implementation chapter: •Currently, cyclists are prohibited from riding on sidewalks in the City Center designated area. A code change needs to be made for that, or facilities need to be provided to access the FWTC. “Accelerate bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure to all street frontages within the City Center area, permitting an interim condition of allowing sidewalk riding to promote safety and comfort in accessing public transit and commercial shopping areas.” •A code change to the Model Traffic Ordinance is in progress (just need to update sections of the WAC that FWRC 8.05.010 refers to). Commented [EL23]: Edited for conciseness Commented [EL24]: Already developed Commented [EL25]: We’re staying away from law enforcement policies Page 153 of 166 T&M - 8 TP2.17 Coordinate development of the non-motorized system with surrounding jurisdictions and regional system extensions. TP2.18 Incorporate environmental factors into transportation decision-making, including attention to human health and safety. TP2.19 Establish a connected system of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit ways that are integrated into a coordinated regional network. TP2.x1 Establish a funding program that prioritizes the most critical non-motorized improvements first. TP2.9 x Develop clean transportation programs and facilities, including actions to reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. Goal 3:4 Support theEnsure Federal Way’s future transportation network decisions are consistent with the City’s land use vision and plan. TP3.1 Integrate land use and transportation plan decisions to support the land use vision and plan. TP3.2 Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of through streets, where feasible, and limiting the area to be served by a single access point commensurate with planned density. TP3.3 Determine street classifications by balancing travel needs with changing right-of-way uses and neighborhood character. TP3.4 Protect existing and acquire future right-of-way consistent with functional classification cross-section (transit, rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs. Commented [EL26]: Moved to a policy under Goal 5 (formerly goal 6) on partnerships with outside agencies Commented [EL27]: Either implemented or addressed through other policies Commented [EL28]: This policy used to be the 2nd part of former Goal 3 since it was more at the policy rather than goal level. Goal 3 became Goal 2 after Goal 2 was deleted. Commented [EL29]: For implementation chapter: Note from PW Traffic: Clarify policy further since this is really vague. Non-point source pollution would reflect electric vehicles. Do we want to prioritize our electric infrastructure to reduce or eliminate fossil fuel consumption when driving EV’s? Are we talking about human powered vehicles? (EV Infrastructure should go into land use/goal 3) Commented [EL30]: Former Goal 4 is now Goal 3. We’re considering deleting or reframing this goal. If deleted relevant policies could be moved to other goals. The reason: this goal is already GMA and Vision 2050 requirement for comp plans (transportation chapter already has to be consistent w/land use chapter) Page 154 of 166 T&M - 9 TP3.5 Require developments to dedicate right-of-way as needed for development commensurate with the impacts of the development. At a minimum, setback limits shall be used to assure that buildings are not placed within the right-of- way requirements for planned transportation facilities. Right-of-way dedication shall be commensurate with a development’s impact to the existing and planned transportation system. TP3.6 Design arterial roadways to fit with the planned character of areas (context sensitive design) they pass through. TP3.7 Enhance the viability of regional and local transit service by establishing design standards for streets that move transit, pedestrian, and cyclists in the City Center. TP3.8a Establish land use policies and fees necessary to evaluate for and clean contamination of soils and the environment surrounding fuel pumping stations as they are phased out. TP3.99 Update parking requirements established in FWRC to consider appropriate regulations considering the provision of electric vehicle parking in new development. TP3.100 Coordinate with local utilities agencies to transition the city’s existing internal combustion motor inventory to electric vehicles, and establish rates and capital improvements necessary to support the electric grid’s increased demand for electricity to fuel automobiles. TP3.8 Monitor growth in population and employment in relation to the land use and growth assumptions of the Transportation Chapter. Reassess the Land Use and Transportation Chapters as needed to ensure that planned improvements will address the potential impacts of growth. Goal 4: Develop and implement transportation systems management strategies and programs that contribute to the overall effectiveness Commented [EL31]: Traffic added new TP3.8-3.11. Commented [EL32]: This has/is happening already consistent with comp plan update cycles Page 155 of 166 T&M - 10 of the multimodal transportation system. TP5.1 Reduce auto dependency, especially drive-alone trips, by employing and promoting the application of programs enhance mobility and assist in achievement of the land use vision. TP4.2 Use In partnership with adjacent communities and other agencies, implement cost-effective transportation demand management to help achieve an appropriate arterial level of service that balances the City’s goals for residents, consumers, employers, and employees. strategies that provide options and flexibility for employers and all users of the transportation system. TP5.3 Support transportation demand management programs that can be shown to be cost-effective in achieving plan goals. Allow residents and employers discretion to choose the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) methods they wish to employ. TP4.4 Encourage employers to institute complementing Transportation System Management (TSM) actions to those undertaken by the City. TP4.5 Support the achievement ofWork toward City and regional mode split goals through assisting all in partnership with Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) affected and voluntary employers. in the Federal Way planning area to achieve the CTR Act travel reduction goals and target. TP5.6 Develop coordinated TDM strategies with regional representatives and other adjacent communities. TP4.7 Incentivize public/private programs that stimulate transit, car pool , and van pool use. TP5.8 Encourage the provision of a robust transportation alternative rich environment so that all members of the Commented [EL33]: Deleted since, between TDM, CTR, and various mobility and other policies that reduce auto-dependency, this policy is redundant with others Commented [EL34]: TP4.2 modified to combine the deleted policies TP5.3 and TP5.6 below Commented [EL35]: Updated for conciseness Commented [EL36]: Address further in implementation chapter, since Current budget is insufficient for this type of engagement Commented [EL37]: TP 5.8 is redundant with many other policies Page 156 of 166 T&M - 11 community, including those with transportation disadvantages, have viable travel options or alternatives. TP5.9 Prioritize development of HOV and transit priority lanes, and prioritizing transit and HOV movements at traffic signals. TP4.10 Continue to implement traffic signal coordination projects as the primary component of a TSM program. As funds permit, monitoring of traffic operations will be carried out to en assure efficient timing of traffic signals. TP4.11 MPublic Works will maintain a mechanism for public comments and requests related to traffic monitoring and other areas for proposed transportation enhancements. TP4.12 Develop a regular data collection and monitoring program. Goal 5:6 Be an active partner with outside agencies and groups to achieve Federal Way’s transportation vision. by coordinating with a broad range of groups to help meet Federal Way’s transportation goals. Policies TP5.1 Implement federal, state, and countywide planning policies. TP5.2 Coordinate transportation improvement programs with appropriate state, regional, and local agencies. TP5.3 CPublic Works shall coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions to develop a fair and consistent means of addressing the impacts of growth and development between jurisdictions without undue administrative burdens. Commented [EL38]: Covered by 2 previous policies on prioritizing or expanding HOV Commented [EL39]: TP 5.9 is covered by 2 other policies on prioritizing or expanding HOV Commented [EL40]: These first 2 are already GMA or Vision 2050 requirements that don’t need to be called out as standalone policies Commented [EL41]: Required and already happening Page 157 of 166 T&M - 12 TP5.4 CThe City will continue to cooperate with regional and local transit providers to develop facilities that make transit a more attractive option. TP5.5 Work with the transit agencies, WSDOT, King County, and other partners, in applying for to pursue funding for HOV improvements that complement transit and non- transit HOV facilities and park & rides within Federal Way. TP52.x7 Strategically use public and private investment to complement the multi-modal vision of the plan, including “matching” improvements to supplement the efforts of other agencies to provide HOV and transit facilities. TP5.6 Coordinate with other agencies and stakeholders to pursue funding for pedestrian and bicycle amenities. TP5.7 Support well-designed regional transportation projects that are appropriately designed and will preserve the movement of people and goods on I-5 and state routes. TP5.8 Involve major generators of area freight and goods movement in discussions to identify their needs and priorities as part of improvement programming; including access to regional marine facilities. TP5.9 Coordinate with local businesses and organizations, and provide feedback to local business organizations on international and regional transportation issues and on transport needs and opportunities related to all modes of transportation. TP5.xx2.17 Coordinate development of the non-motorized system with surrounding jurisdictions and regional system extensions. Commented [EL42]: Moved here from goal 6 since it involves coordination w/entities outside the city Commented [EL43]: Moved here from goal 2 since it involves coordination w/entities outside the city Page 158 of 166 T&M - 13 TP 5.xx TP2.x2 Develop a program to create portions of the non-motorized system through public-private partnerships. TP2.3 Prioritize transportation projects considering concurrency, safety, multimodal enhancements, environmental impacts, and cost effectiveness. Goal 6: Preserve, maintain, and expand the lifespan and usefulness of Federal Way’s existing transportation infrastructure. Policies TP6.x EnAssure cost-effective maintenance of transportation facilities under the City’s jurisdiction, including non- motorized facilities. TP2.5 Leverage state and federal funds for transportation improvements. TP62.x6 The maintenance and preservation of existing travel infrastructure shall take precedence over major street improvement projects that expand system capacity. TP2.7 Strategically use public and private investment to complement the multi-modal vision of the plan, including “matching” improvements to supplement the efforts of other agencies to provide HOV and transit facilities. TP2.8 Construct cCapacity enhancements will be constructedonly where lower cost improvements cannot correct deficiencies; these capacity enhancements will be developed to be as competitive as possible for obtaining grants. TP2.9 Develop clean transportation programs and facilities, including actions to reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. TP2.10 Identify stable and predictable funding sources for maintaining and preserving existing transportation facilities and services. Commented [EL44]: Moved from former goal 2 it involves coordination w/entities outside the city Commented [EL45]: New goal to capture existing policies on preservation and maintenance Commented [EL46]: This is a given/constant and doesn’t need to be its own policy Commented [EL47]: Moved to goal 5 Commented [EL48]: Moved to Goal 2 Page 159 of 166 T&M - 14 3.5 The Layered Network 3.6 Capital Improvements Plan 3.7 Financing and Implementation Plan 3.8 Appendices Page 160 of 166 Puget Sound Hylebos Waterway 35thAve SWNa s s auAve NE21st AveSWHoyt Rd SWNorthsho r e Pk wy NE Ma r i neVi ewDr 509 Twin Lakes Golf & Country Club Dash Point State Park Northeast Tacoma Adelaide Buenna Sitcum Waterway Blair Waterway E A l e x a n d e r A v e P or t o f T a c o m a RdE 11th StTa y l o r W a y LincolnAve54th Ave E Marin e V i ew Dr S Star L a k e R d38th AveSS 288th St16th Ave S 99 509 5 Lake Fenwick Park Star Lake SteelLakeS 3 0 8 t h S t 56thAve S56th Ave S S 3 5 2 nd St9thAveS46thPl S 51stAve SMilit aryRdS S 3 1 2 t h S t S 336th St S 298th St 18 99 99 509 167161 5 West Hylebos Wetlands Park Mirror Lake Federal Way 32nd Ave SW ValleyHwyEMilitary RdSS 3 6 0th St 28th Ave S 167 161 99 5 Hylebos Wetlands Jovita Fife Heights Algona King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Change in Employment 2018-2044 Estimated Increase in Number of Jobs 2018-2044 0 - 62 63 - 206 207 - 661 662 - 1550 1551 - 2670 City Limits Map Date: February 2023 | City of Federal Way GIS Division | 33325 8th Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 | (253) 835-7000 | www.cityoffederalway.comR:\annam\CD\CompPlan\Maps\FutureYear_Households_Jobs.aprx Page 161 of 166 Puget Sound Hylebos Waterway 35thAve SWNa s s auAve NE21st AveSWHoyt Rd SWNorthsho r e Pk wy NE Ma r i neVi ewDr 509 Twin Lakes Golf & Country Club Dash Point State Park Northeast Tacoma Adelaide Buenna Sitcum Waterway Blair Waterway E A l e x a n d e r A v e P or t o f T a c o m a RdE 11th StTa y l o r W a y LincolnAve54th Ave E Marin e V i ew Dr S Star L a k e R d38th AveSS 288th St16th Ave S 99 509 5 Lake Fenwick Park Star Lake SteelLakeS 3 0 8 t h S t 56thAve S56th Ave S S 3 5 2 nd St9thAveS46thPl S 51stAve SMilit aryRdS S 3 1 2 t h S t S 336th St S 298th St 18 99 99 509 167161 5 West Hylebos Wetlands Park Mirror Lake Federal Way 32nd Ave SW ValleyHwyEMilitary RdSS 3 6 0th St 28th Ave S 167 161 99 5 Hylebos Wetlands Jovita Fife Heights AlgonaEstimated Increase in Number of Households 2018-2044 0 - 47 48 - 147 148 - 324 325 - 599 600 - 1079 City Limits Map Date: February 2023 | City of Federal Way GIS Division | 33325 8th Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 | (253) 835-7000 | www.cityoffederalway.comR:\annam\CD\CompPlan\Maps\FutureYear_Households_Jobs.aprx Change in Households 2018-2044 King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Page 162 of 166 Transportation & Mobility Chapter Update Schedule - DRAFT 2023 2024 Feb ‘23 Mar ‘23 Apr ‘23 May ‘23 Jun ‘23 Jul ‘23 Aug ‘23 Sep ‘23 Oct ‘23 Nov ‘23 Dec ‘23 Q1 ‘24 Q2 ‘24 Q3 ‘24 Q4 ‘24 Draft Updated Goals & Policies Draft Updated Existing Conditions PC Early Draft Review LUTC Early Draft Review Model Calibration Model Run Citywide Model Post-Processing Citywide Model Run for the ‘Dip’ Model Post-Processing for the ‘Dip’ Project scoping and ID Project costing Draft Capital, Financing, Implmt. Plans Consistency Review w/other Chapters PC Full Draft Review LUTC Full Draft Review PSRC Early Review + Refinement Public Hearing & Council Adoption PSRC Certification Review If Needed – Updates post-PSRC review Page 163 of 166 1 MEMORANDUM Community Development Department DATE: February 15, 2023 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chaney Skadsen, Senior Planner Keith Niven, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Briefing on Accessory Dwelling Units MEETING OBJECTIVE 1. Provide the Planning Commission a briefing on Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) production in the City of Federal Way and review desired outcomes, key issues and barriers identified as a basis for future code amendments. 2. Solicit feedback and input. HOUSING CONTEXT Housing choice and housing affordability continue to be one the greatest challenges facing the Puget Sound region. Rising demand continues to outpace supply and often does not result in the typology, size, and price desired by existing and future residents. In 2019, the City of Federal Way received a $100,000 grant from the Washington State Department of Commerce to prepare a Housing Action Plan (HAP). The goal of a HAP, as stated in RCW 36.70A.040, is: “to encourage construction of additional affordable and market-rate housing in a greater variety of housing types and at prices that are accessible to a greater variety of incomes, including strategies aimed at the for-profit single-family home market.” In October 2021, the City Council approved the City’s Housing Action Plan which provides a strategic road map for actions to encourage housing production, greater housing diversity, and expand housing choices. The HAP identified 4 housing objectives and 8 strategies stated below: Housing Objectives: 1. Promote new housing development that expands housing choices and is inclusive to community needs. 2. Encourage homeownership opportunities and support equitable housing outcomes. 3. Plan for continued growth and ensure that the built environment promotes community development and increases the quality of life for Federal Way’s existing and future residents. 4. Preserve existing affordable housing stock to prevent displacement pressure. Housing Strategies: 1. Promote a dense, walkable, mixed-use City Center as a complete neighborhood. 2. Promote mixed use, walkable, subareas and neighborhood centers. 3. Increase diversity in housing choice through expanding missing middle development opportunities 4. Encourage Accessory Dwelling Unit production Page 164 of 166 2 5. Ensure that financial and regulatory incentives for mixed-income housing are effective. 6. Review school impact fees on multifamily housing. Implementation - Modify zoning and development regulations to remove potential barriers to ADU production - Streamline permitting to promote ADU production BACKGROUND ADUs are small living spaces that share a parcel with an existing or concurrently-built house (the primary dwelling unit). ADUs come in many configurations such as attached located in the basement, attic, garage conversion, or detached backyard cottage or garage apartment, that are not connected to a house. ADUs provide an accessible housing opportunity for intergenerational households, aging populations, people with disabilities, as well as other household forms through the unique opportunity to create an independent living space added to an existing lot. Accessory dwelling units are increasingly popular particularly among property owners. Frequently the applicants for ADUs are the property owners themselves and often lack familiarity with local permitting and are not involved in the commercial development or construction industry. FEDERAL WAY ADU PRODUCTION An inventory of permit history identified that between the years of 2001-2021 a total of 60 ADU permits were issued. Of the permits issued only 35 were built and received a final inspection. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 ADU Production Permitted ADUs ADUs Constructed by Year (By Final Built Date) Page 165 of 166 3 REGULATIONS The 1993 Washington Housing Policy Act required many Washington cities and counties to adopt ordinances encouraging the development of accessory apartments or ADUs in single-family zones per RCW 43.63A.215 and RCW 36.70A.400. The City adopted regulations for the provision of ADUs in 1995 and amended such regulations multiple times. Most recently the provisions regulating ADUs were amended in 2022 1 to update the definition for accessory dwelling unit and to comply with state statute 2 regarding off street parking. The City of Federal Way’s current regulations of accessory dwelling units include numerous requirements. Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC)3 currently features an owner occupancy requirement, limits the size of the ADU to 800 square feet or up to 40% of the primary unit size whichever is less, and requires an additional parking space for properties outside of a ¼ mile radius from a major transit stop. However, some of these regulations serve as barriers to developing ADUs, resulting in fewer ADU units being constructed. The future draft code amendments will intend to implement the HAP Strategy #4 Encourage Accessory Dwelling Unit production through the following: - Streamline permitting process - Reduce cost for ADU production - Adopt code language and regulations that are easy to understand and apply Key issues identified include the following: - Permitting process - Impact fees - Dimensional requirements and maximum allowed size - Nonconforming lot size - Parking - Restrictive covenant and owner occupancy PROPOSED SCHEDULE 2/15 Planning Commission Briefing 5/3 or 5/17 Planning Commission Public Hearing 6/5 LUTC Presentation 6/20 City Council First Reading 7/5 City Council Second Reading 1 Ordinance No. 22-932 2 ESSB 6617 3 FWRC 19.200.010 & 19.200.180 Page 166 of 166