Loading...
PRHSPSC PKT 09-11-2000 Clìns City of Federal Way CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES & PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE ~onday,Septemberll,2000 12:00 p.m. City Hall Mt. Baker Conference Room AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC FORUM 3. CO~~ISSION CO~ENTS 4. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 7, 2000 SUMMARY 5. COMMITTEE BUSINESS A. ALEA Grant B. Parks & Recreation Commission By-Laws C. PubliclPrivate Partnerships D. Play Equipment Purchase/Alderbrook and Wedgewood Parks Procedures/Guidelines for Review of Changes to Park Properties and Facilities Funding for Traffic Safety Emphasis Overtime Funding for School Zone Enforcement E. F. G. 6. NEXT MEETING - October 9, 2000 7. ADJO~ENT Action Faber Information Schroder Action Schroder Action Jainga Action Schroder Action Coloumbe Action Coloumbe Committee Members: Jeanne Burbidge, Chair Mary Gates Dean McColgan Staff: Jennifer Schroder, Director Sue Smith, Administrative Assistant 661-4041 City of federal Way City Council PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES & PUBLIC SAFETY COUNCIL COMMITTEE Monday, August 7, 2000 12:00 p.m. SUMMARY In attendance: Council Committee members Jeanne Burbidge, Dean McColgan, Mary Gates; Council member Linda Kochmar; David Moseley, City Manager; Derek Matheson, Assistant to the City Manager; Jennifer Schroder, Director of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department; Pat Richardson, Assistant City Attorney; Tom Chaney, Deputy Director of Public Safety; Brian Wilson, Deputy Director of Public Safety; Sandra Warter, Municipal Court Administrator; Ann Guenther, Human Services Manager; Carnron Parker, CDBG Coordinator; Sue Floyd, Administrative Assistant Guests: Dini Duclos, Eric Olsen, Richard Bye Chair Burbidge called the meeting to order at 12:00 p.m. PUBLIC FORUM None COMMISSION COMMENTS Dini Duclos, Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission, reported that the commission's Community Relations Committee is looking into the issue of a dog park. To date, the commission has not made a decision! recommendation, but will hold public meetings on the issue. Ms. Gates received some citizen comments regarding a dog park: 1) the park will be of a regional nature, and 2) would require significant parking. APPROVAL OF SUMMARY The July 10, 2000 summary was approved as corrected. -- BUSINESS ITEMS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Ms. Warter reported that the interagency agreement between the Municipal Court and the Department of Licensing will allow court staff to access the vehicle information database to confmn registered owners of vehicles that have received citations. This would allow the staff to notify the registered owner of the citation and proceed with collections. DEAN MCCOLGAN MOVED, MARY GATES SECONDED A MOTION TO ADOPT THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE W ASIDNGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND THE FEDERAL WAY MUNICIPAL COURT. MOTION PASSED. JAIL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS/CHELAN AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES Mr. Chaney reported that with the estimated 40% increase to the King County Jail billings over the past 18 months, the department has been exploring several proactive approaches to reduce jail costs. Both Chelan and Okanogan Counties have agreed to provide the City of Federal Way a place of confmement for the incarceration of one or more inmates lawfully committed to its custody as well as compensation mutually agreed upon by both parties. Chelan County does not charge a booking fee and will save the City 6-12.3% for the daily rate versus King County. There would be a savings of 85% in booking fees and 33.2% in the daily rate for Okanogan County. Chelan County has approved the interlocal agreement, while Okanogan County is currently reviewing the document, but has tentatively agreed to it. Chelan and Okanogan Counties would be responsible for transporting the inmates. The City is not committed to a specific bed number, so the Regional Justice Center is still an option. The Regional Justice Center would still be used for pre-trial incarcerations. The committee would like to see a budget breakdown of costs and dollars saved in the agenda packet for the Council meeting of September 5. MARY GATES MOVED, DEAN MCCOLGAN SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE AND ACCEPT THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND CHELAN COUNTY AND FORWARD TO FULL COUNCIL. MOTION PASSED. DEAN MCCOLGAN MOVED, MARY GATES SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT AND ACCEPT THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND OKANOGAN COUNTY FOR THE HOUSING OF INMATES AND FORWARD TO FULL COUNCIL. MOTION PASSED. CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT Mr. Chaney reported that during the annual review of the criminal code, the Department of Public Safety requested amendments to City Code Chapter Six. The purpose of this amendment is to bring current the City Criminal Code Chapter Six as set forth by the State Statutes R.c.W. and to expand Chapter Six to specifically address the establishment of "Stay Out of Areas of Prostitution" orders. These orders, which can be issued by the Federal Way Municipal Court, will provide an additional approach against crimes of prostitution typically repeated in such areas. The cities of Des Moines, SeaTac and Fife have adopted this code. The court order issued would state that this person must stay out of a particular area, in this case 1,000 feet along Pacific Highway South. DEAN MCCOLGAN MOVED, MARY GATES SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE CHAPTER SIX, CRIMINAL CODE. MOTION PASSED TRAFFIC UNIT RADAR REIMBURSEMENT Interim Public Safety Chief Chaney reported that for the Department of Public Safety's participation in the "School Zone Safety Prograrn," the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission has provided a $12,310.08 reimbursement to purchase new equipment for this program. The Department of Public Safety asked approval to accept the reimbursement for the purchase of radar equipment. MARY GATES MOVED, DEAN MCCOLGAN SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE AND ACCEPT RADAR UNIT REIMBURSEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,310.08 FROM THE WASHINGTON STATE TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION. MOTION PASSED. PUBLI C/PRIV A TE PARTNERSHIPS . Staff have been working with the Parks and Recreation Commission to develop a proactive plan to respond to future inquiries for public/private partnerships. The Parks and Recreation Commission approved the following recommendation at their August 3 meeting regarding procedures to use when considering public/private partnerships as a means to provide certain public recreation services: 1) Proposals for public/private partnerships must be evaluated for compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. In addition, projects proposed on park property must be evaluated for compatibility with the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan. A due diligence/feasibility report shall be prepared by the proponent at their own expense to review all necessary permits, mitigation requirements and environmental impacts. City and the proponent to hold a public meeting for the community to review and co~t on the proposal. After the Council has reviewed all the above criteria of a proposal and deems the project will provide public benefit-compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plans, then the City should proceed to negotiate a lease agreement. Sites to consider public/private partnerships include Steel Lake, Lakota, Sacajawea, Celebration and French Lake Parks. 2) 3) 4) -. 5) The commission further recommended that they continue to be the advisory body to review proposed public/private partnerships when the proposal involves park property. Council member Gates asked if the full Council should see the proposal prior to going through steps one through five, and should this policy be tied to all city public/private partnerships, not just parks? It was determined that this policy shall affect parks only. It was also suggested that all park properties be included and exceptions be discussed (i.e., a proposal comes to the City that is good but is not compatible with the Comprehensive Plan). .' Because some questions need to be answered and/or clarified, MARY GATES MOVED, DEAN MCCOLGAN SECONDED A MOTION TO RETURN THIS ITEM TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FOR FURTHER REVIEW. MOTION PASSED. 2001 CDBG RECOMMENDA nONS Mr. Parker gave an overview of the Community Development Block Grant program for 2001. The Council had previously received a preliminary recommendation based on an original grant estimate of $488,302. On July 21, the City received a revised grant estimate of$591,177. The Human Services Commission's contingency plan was used to adjust the recommendation to accommodate the change in funds available. Of the $591,177 total, $434,735 is available for capital projects, $82,255 is available for public service programs, and $74,187 is available for planning and administration activities. Mr. Olsen, Chair of the Human Services Commission, explained that for capital projects, additional money was allowed to fund rust-time homebuyers. King County matches these funds. The committee was concerned about the Community Caregiving Network application (FUSION). They have requested $125,000 for one condo unit in Federal Way. In the past, the applicant used grants of $50,000 to purchase condominium units. The application stated that the increase was due to overall increases in the cost of housing in Federal Way, and a limited pool of condominium complexes where siting of transitional housing is allowed. Any monies not expended for the purchase of a unit would be returned to the City. Ms. Kochmar suggested placing a condition on the award requiring the agency to actively seek out a lower cost unit. MARY GATES MOVED, DEAN MCCOLGAN SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND .APPROV AL OF THE 2001 CDBG PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS AS PRESENTED BY THE HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION. TillS RECOMMENDATION IS FORWARDED TO THE FULL CITY COUNCIL AT THE SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 MEETING. MOTION PASSED. 2001 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA Mr. Matheson reviewed the draft 2001 Legislative Agenda with committee members. The paper was revised by staff to address current issues such as Motor Vehicle Excise Tax permanent replacement, design-build procedures, local court reform, probation liability and protection of grant funds. Staff will present the document, with committee amendments, to full Council on September 19. Following a brief question and answer period, Council member Gates suggested a discussion on affordable housing and making a support system available to the clients (caseworkers). . NEXT MEETING September 11, 2000 ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 1 :33 p.m. Item SA CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: September 4, 2000 To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee From: Mary Faber, Community and Cultural Services Manager Via: David Manager Subject: Aquatic Land Enhancement Account Dumas Bay Restoration Project Resolution Back!!round: The Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA) is a program that provides a 50% match for projects that include the purchase, improvement, or protection of aquatic lands for public purposes and for providing and improving access to such lands. Projects that are approved during this grant cycle will receive funding during Washington State's 2001-2003 biennium (July 1, 2000-June 30, 2003). At the May 16 Council meeting, Council approved a Resolution to submit a grant application for Dumas Bay Centre property. The project scope proposed is to remove existing asphalt on the grounds behind the Centre and increase storm water infiltration to reduce erosion and protect the existing aquatic habitat in Dumas Bay. Prior to completing a site plan, the preliminary cost estimates for the project came to $500,000.00. Based on the final site plan, the cost estimate for the project is $516,822.82. The City's match of$258,411.41 has been submitted as a new program request as part of the City's 2001-2002 biennium budget process. - Additionally, staff is reviewing two other grant sources from the Corps of Engineers and Salmon Recovery Funding for the City's 50% match. The ALEA Application requires official approval ofthe project's site plan. Therefore, the Arts Commission reviewed the application and final site plan for the project at the August Committee meeting and voted to approve the site plan. A copy of the application, cost estimate, project scope, and site plan is included. Committee Recommendation: Motion to place on the City Council's October 3 agenda, under Consent, approval of the site plan as submitted in the Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account Grant Application for the Dumas Bay Restoration Project. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member ~ CITY OF . . . £ ~ .' ~- ~ Form #4 Development Project (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003-6210 To: Department of Natural Resources ALBA Program Division of Aquatic Resources Box 47027 Olympia, Washington 98504-7027 From: City of Federal Way Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003 You are hereby requested to consider this application for financial assistance for the project described herein and to grant funding from the Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account. This application has been prepared with full knowledge of, and in compliance with, the instructions contained in the "ALEA Grant Application Booklet." Further, we agree to cooperate with the Department of Natural Resources by furnishing such additional information as may be necessary to qualify for state aid, execute an ALEA project grant agreement and to adhere to all appropriate state statutes governing the grant funäs. We are aware that the grant-in-aid, if approved, will be paid on a reimbursement basis. Inquiries regarding this application are to be directed to: I" Mary Faber, Community & Cultural Services Manager City of Federal Way Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department 33530 1st Way South Feden~l Way, W A 98003 (253) 661-4047 We certify that to the best of our knowledge the data in the application are true and correct. ... 'r' Item 5B PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBMITTED BY: VIA: SUBJECT: August 16, 2000 Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee Parks and Recreation comm~' s . Jennifer Schr r irector David M ele ana er By-Laws of the arks and Recreation Commission/Revised August 3,2000 The Parks and Recreation Commission formed a committee to review the commission's by-laws specifically as it pertains to the process of nominating the positions of Chair and V ice Chair. A copy of the revised by-laws are attached as information only. The revisions to the by-laws are in Sections 3., 4.d, and 4.e. A copy of the committee's minutes describes the rationale for the changes. The commission approved the changes to the by-laws at their August 3, 2000 meeting. /1\ City of Federal Way BY-LAWS OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION We, the members ofthe Federal Way Parks and Recreation Commission, pursuant to Ordinance No. 91-93, adopted on April 24, 1991 by the Federal Way City Council, do hereby adopt the following BY-LAWS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ORGANIZA nON AND RULES OF PROCEDURE The official name is the City of Federal Way Parks and Recreation Commission. The official seat of the Commission is the City Hall of the City of Federal Way. The Commission consists of at least nine members and may consist of up to eleven members appoint~d by th~ City Council by appointin~ the alternate(s) as a member(s). The City Council shall determine upon the expiration of any member's term if a need exists "to appoint more than nine members to the Commission. The Commission consists of up to two appointed alternate members. Alternate members serve a term of up to three years. The officers of the Commission consists of a chairperson and a vice-chairperson. Their duties are: a. The chairperson presides over the Commission and exercises all the powers incidental to the office, retaining, however, the full right as a member of the Commission to have a vote recorded in all deliberations of the Commission, to propose motions and to second motions. b. In the absence of the chairperson from any meeting, the vice-chairperson performs all the duties incumbent upon the chairperson, and retains the full right as a member of the Commission to have a vote recorded in all deliberations of the Commission, to propose motions and to second motions. c. The chairperson and vice-chairperson both being absent from any meeting, the members present must elect a temporary chairperson who would have full powers as chairperson during the absence of the chairperson and vice-chairperson retaining the full right as a member ofthe Commission to have a vote recorded in all deliberations of the Commission, to propose motions and to second motions. d. Officers are elected at a meeting in the 5th 3rd calendar month of the year effective 2001. e. Officers hold officefor one year terms. There is no limit on the number ofterms to which officers may be elected. There is no automatic s~ccession by the vice chair to chair. All officers must be elected at the annual electíon. ,~ Parks and Recreation Commission By-Laws Page Two 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. f. Committees are established by the Commission. The chairperson ofthe Commission serves as an ex-officio member of all committees and appoints a Commission member or alternate as chairperson for each committee. A secretary for the Commission is responsible for record-keeping. This position will be non- elected and is filled by a City staff member. Ouorum A quorum consists of five (5) members of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Voting When a quorum is present, a simple majority vote suffices for all action. No vo.te may be made by proxy or alternates. The Parks and Recreation Commission will have nine (9) members with two (2) alternates receiving voting rights after one (1) year of service subject to the majority vote of the full Commission. Conflict of Interest a. Any commissioner or alternate having a direct or indirect interest in or who would benefit from any matter must disclose this interest and, if deemed appropriate by that .- commissioner or alternate or required by law, refrain from participating or voting on the matter at hand. b. All members of the Commission and alternates must abide by the City of Federal Way Code of Ethics established in Resolution No. 91-54.. c. Each Commissioner or alternate must submit and annually update a declaration of conflict of interest to be held on file. Meetings a. The Commission meets monthly at a predetermined time and location. Additional meetings may be held upon call of the chairperson, as necessary. b. Not less than 24 hours notice must be given for the posting, publication or cancellation of any meeting of the Commission. c. An executive session may be called by the Commission to discuss matters within the Commission's authority as authorized in RCW 42.30.110. ," Parks and Recreation Commission By-Laws Page Three 11. 12. d. Regular Commission meetings will begin at 6:00 p.m. and will adjourn no later than 9:00 p.m. To continue past this time of adjournment, a majority of the Commission members present must concur. Public hearings shall not exceed two hours, unless a majority of the Commission members present concur, or wish to continue the hearing to a later date. e. The types of meetings to be held by the Commission and the contents of each shall be as follows: 1. Regular business meetings on the first Thursday of the month shall include minutes ofthe previous meeting, public forum, staff activity update reports, informational material review for CIP projects, Commission comments/committee reports and correspondence. >2. Special presentations, on a date other than the first Thursday of the month, shall be limited to one subject only. The topics shall be citizen-generated, subjects referred to the Commission by the City Council, staff overviews (with or without consultants present), or Commission-generated topics. 3. Public hearings shall contain only one subject. The sequence of presentation shall be: staff summary of pertinent information, public comment and questions, Commission comment and questions, Commission deliberation -. and recommendation. Attendance a. A commissioner may be excused from a meeting by providing advance notice to the Commission chairperson, vice-chairperson or staff secretary. b. In the event any commissioner has unexcused absences from three or more meetings held during any calendar year, the Commission may request that the City Council appoint a replacement for that member. Conduct of Meetings a. If a hearing is being conducted, motions will be made, seconded and voted upon. Recommendations will be forwarded to the City Council. b. If a workshop is being conducted, formal action is not necessary; workshop actions will not be forwarded to the City Council as recommendations of the Commission. c. In the event a quorum is not present, a minimum of four. members must be present to hold a meeting for discussion purposes only. Voting cannot take place at such a meeting. Parks and Recreation Commission By-Laws 13. 14. Page Four d. Except as provided by these rules and regulations, Roberts Rules of Order (as amended) will govern the conduct of all Commission meetings. Agendas. Staff Reports and Minutes a. A copy of the agenda for all Parks and Recreation Commission meetings must be sent to each Commission member and alternates no less than one week prior to the date of the meeting. No action will be taken on an agenda item unless sufficient background information is included in the agenda packet. b. The staff will provide necessary staff reports. They will be sent to Commission members and alternates no less than one week prior to the date ofthe meeting except for data on leases, contracts, agreements and financial matters which shall be sent to the appropriate Commission subcommittee no less than ten days prior to the next Commission meeting. c. Minutes of all Commission meetings will be kept by a staff person and made part of a permanent record. Amending By-Laws These by-laws may be amended by maj ority voting at any Parks and Recreation Commission: meeting when a quorum is in attendance. CERTIFICATION The undersigned secretary of the City of Federal Way Parks and Recreation Commission does hereby certify that the foregoing by-laws have been duly adopted by the members of said Commission. Adopted: Revised: ATTEST: By: Chairperson, City of Federal Way Parks and Recreation Commission - U~/¿"I¿'~U,! Uð:ó)j toM '¡:ó)j ð(4 '~LJ-!-- ~ KINb CO MSC . ~OOJ ( Ad Hoc Commiliee Meeting 6/26/00 Members Present: Dini Duclos, Dave Annstrong, Jim Baker, Jerry Bollen and Carl Grosch Discussion focused on two main items: sc\ection of chair and vice chair of the commission and timing of the elections. After much discussion on whether to establish a nominating committee it was the consensus of the group not to do so, The following are the recommendations put forth to the Commission as a whole for adoption. Change the Commission By-Laws to read as follows: Section 4.d. "Officers arc elected at a meeting in the third (3rd) calendar month of thc year, effective 200'," Rationale: The new chair and vice chair can have one month in office and be available to serve on the selection committee for new commissioners. This gives new commissioner a sense of continuity, Section 4.e. "Officers hold office for one year terms. There is no limitation on thê number of tenns to which officers may be elected. There is no automatic succession by the vice chair to chair. An officers must be elected at the annual election." Rational: The Commission is to small for a nominating committee. such a committee might become politicized, there could be confliet of interest is a nominating committee member also wanted to be nomir1ated for office, It was felt that changing the By-Laws to clearly Slate the process would be sufficient Section 3. "The parks and recreation commission shall consist of at least nine members and may consist of up to eleven members by appointing the alternate(s) as a member or member, The city counell shall determine upon the expiration of any member's term if a need. exists to appoint more than nine members to the commission" Rationale: Update the By-Laws to be in accord with Council Ordinance 98-312. Item 5C PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5,2000 TO: SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation, Human serv~/~ Public Safety C Jennifer Schroder, Direct°rVt11 David Mo~ao¿'r Public/Private Partnerships mittee FROM: VIA: The following attached information will be presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission on September 7, 2000. Staff will present a final commission recommendation at your September 11 meeting. ( PARKS, RECREATION AND CUL11JRAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: August 16, 2000 Parks and Recreation commission~. Capital Facilities Committee I ~ Jennifer Schroder, Director '(J Public/Private Partnerships Background Parks and Recreation Commission submitted to the Council Committee on August 7, guidelines to follow when considering Public/Private Partnerships. The Council Committee returned this item to the commission for further review and with the following comments: Be more specific. Who does what when? What about exceptions? Address recommendation to parks only, not city wide. Include all park property Capital Facilities Committee Recommendation The Capital Facilities Committee met on August 10,2000 to consider the Council Committees comments. In attendance were Laird Chambers, Dini Duclos, Marion Bartholomew, Jim Baker, staff Jennifer Schroder and Jon Jainga. The committee recommends the following: ( 1. Under the direction of the City Manager, a proposal for public/private partnerships will be evaluated by staff for compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan. '. 2. Following the receipt of a proposal, the City Manager will present to the City Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission the scope of the proposal, along with a summary of the project's compatibility with the comprehensive plans. 3. After review of the proposal, Council will direct the City Manager to either continue or end consideration of the proposal. 4. If Council approves the City Manager to continue review of the proposal, the Parks and Recreation Commission, together with the proponent, will hold a public meeting for the community to review and comment on the proposal. 5. The Parks and Recreation Commission will provide a summary report identifying the public's comments recorded to the Council Committee. 6. The Council Committe~ will forward a recommendation to full Council for the City Manager to either continue or end consideration of the proposal. 7. If the Council approves the City Manager to continue review of the proposal, the City Manager will require the proponent t<) conduct a due diligence/feasibility report, prepared by the proponent at their own expense, to review and will include, but not be limited to: a;ll necessary permits, ~ ( mitigation requirements and environmental impacts. In addition, the proponent will provide the City a business plan. 8. The City Manager and/or his designee will present to the City Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission a summary of the proponent's feasibility report and business plan. 9. Based on all the infonnation reviewed, the Parks and Recreation Commission will forward a recommendation to the Council Committee. 10. After the consideration of the Commission's recommendation, the Council Committee will forward their recommendation to full Council. 11. The City Council, after review of the Council Committee's recommendation, will either direct the City Manager to negotiate a lease agreement with the proponent or end consideration of the proposal. 12. After the City has approved a lease agreement, the applicant will be required to include the PRCS Department and the Parks and Recreation Commission in the design review processes. 13. Sites to consider public/private partnerships include, but are not limited to, Steel Lake, Lakota, Sacajawea, Celebration and French Lake Parks. Parks and Recreation Commission recommendation options: Option One: To recommend to the PRHSPS Council Committee on September 11 approval of the Capital Facilities Committee recommendation for procedures to follow when evaluating public/private partnerships. ( Option Two: To recommend to the PRHSPS Council Committee on September 11 approval of the Capital Facilities Committee recommendation for procedures to follow when evaluating public/private partnerships as amended by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Option Three: To return this item to the Capital Facilities Committee for further review. "f: Item 5D PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee From: Jon Jainga,~arks P anning and Development Manage~õ Via: David Mo anager Q I Date: 09/05/00 Re: Alderbrook and Wedgewood Neighborhood Park Play Structure Purchase Approval The attached information will be presented to the Parks and Recreation Commißsion on September 7,2000 during their regular meeting for review and approval regarding the Alderbrook and Wedgewood Neighborhood Park Play Structures. Staff will present a final Commission recommendation at your September 11 meeting. 8 Page 1 PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: Parks and Recreation Commission From: Jon Jainga, Parks Planning and Development Manag~ Date: 09/05/00 LV Re: Alderbrook and Wedgewood Neighborhood Park Play Structure Purchase Approval Background: May 24, 2000, Landscape Architect firm Hough-Beck and Baird, worked with Staff and Pacific Playground, Inc., to create two play structure proposals for Alderbrook and Wedgewood Neighborhood Park. On June 9,2000, Hough-Beck and Baird provide the City's Neighborhood Specialist the proposed play structure layouts for the two parks. The City's Neighborhood Specialist met with groups from both neighborhoods to review and comment on the proposed play structures. Staffhad an additional meeting at Alderbrook Park with Lisa Welch and eight neighbor children on August 14, 2000 to review and comment on the park proposals as well. After meeting with both groups, staffhas incorporated the neighborhood comments into the final design. Staffhas reviewed the final cost for the purchase of the play structures. The cost of the play structures include the play equipment, soft-surfacing material and a one day site supervision from Pacific Playground to work with volunteers on the community built installation option. (Note: The community built installation option saves the City approximately $5,000 toward the manufacturer installation.] The play structure packages for Alderbrook and Wedgewood are both within the project budget. Alderbrook: Project Budget: Funding Source: $33,000 Mitigation fees collected from fee-in-lieu of account Project Cost: $25,364.62 (includes WSST) Wedeewood: Project Budget: Funding Source: $50,000 1999 / 2000 General Fund account . Page 1 , ";"~ , Project Cost: $24,681.52 (includes WSST) Note: The balance fund of the project budget will purchase benches and picnic tables for Wedgewood Park. Staffhas tentatively scheduled the community volunteer work parties for September 29 for Alderbrook and October 6 for Wedgewood. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the play structures for Alderbrook Park, purchase amount of $25,364.62 and Wedgewod Park., purchase amount of$24,681.52. Commission Recommendation: Recommend approval of the play structures for Alderbrook Park, purchase amount of $25,364.62 and Wedgewod Park., purchase amount of$24,681.52 and forward to Council Committee for approval. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member . Page 2 Item 5E PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: To: From: Submitted by: Via: Subject June 27, 2000 Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Pub ic Safety Council Committee Parks and Recreation Commissio Jennifer L. Schroder Director David Mose~nage Procedure/G~iJJí¡ri~~fo~ Review of Changes to Park Properties and Facilities Background: The Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee reviewed the commission's recommendation on procedure guidelines for Celebration Park on June 12, 2000. The committee recommended changes to the commission's recommendation. The committee directed staff to return this item to the commission and asked that they review their changes and forward a recommendation on the proposed guidelines. Furthermore, the committee stated that the guidelines should not be limited to Celebration Park. The guidelines should apply to all park properties. The committee's changes are shown below. Deletes are shown as strike-outs, adds are underlined: Where possible. any changes to park properties and facilities (with the exception of Dumas Bay Centre and Knutzen Family Theatre) in the use or change/installation of new structures or facilities beyond replacement of G~l"l¡l1b shuduu:;s Ul fdGil¡l¡"" be reviewed al1J dpplU v vd by the commission. The commission will forward a recommendation to the council committee Pall:. aüd R"",Gal¡ul1 CUUl1Ga CUl1.1.n~lt"", kbdl ~laff And ell, cuuü"a. When legal review is appropriate. the Law Department will review the recommendation prior to forwarding to the Council Committee. Council Committee's final recommendation will be placed before the full Council for adoption. Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendation: At the commission's August 3,2000 meeting, the commission reviewed the Council Committee's changes to the proposed procedure. The commission passed a motion to recommend to the Council Committee to accept the changes recommended by the Council Committee and to add the word "all" before "parks." The recommended procedure/guidelines to follow where possible to review changes to park properties and facilities is the following: Where possible, any changes to all park properties and facilities (with the exception of Dumas Bay Centre and Knutzen Family Theatre) in the use or change/installation of new structures or facilities beyond replacement be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The commission will forward a recommendation to the Council Committee. When legal review is appropriate, the Law Department will review the recommendation prior to forwarding to the Council Committee. Council Committee's final recommendation will be placed before the full Council for adoption. Council Committee Recommendation Options: Option one: To move to City Council on October 3, under consent: to r.pprove the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation on procedure/guidelines to review changes to all park properties and facilities. Option two: To move to City Council on October 3, under consent: to approve the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation on procedure/guidelines to review changes to all park properties and facilities as amended by the committee. Option Three: To return this item to the Parks and Recreation Commission for further review. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member 'j .' Item SF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT Date: September 11, 2000 From: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee Thomas J. Chaney, Sr., Interim Chief of police-1~ To: Subject: David ~ Manager Funding for Traffic Safety Emphasis Patrols (commonly referred to as DOTS) Via: Background: In 1999, the Federal Way Department of Public Safety received an overtime reimbursement in the amount of $1,483.23 for participating in the DOTS (DUI Oriented Traffic Stops) Program. Since its conception, several concerns have been addressed at State level. Primarily the intent ofthis program has changed from intentionally stopping as many drivers as possible for minor traffic violations and then focusing on the sobriety of the driver to conducting specific traffic patrols targeted at traffic violators. Clearly, DUI is one ofthe most serious traffic crimes and appropriate procedures should be ensured. Secondly, the overwhelming response from law enforcement agencies statewide has made it necessary to impose this program as a grant with special conditions and a required local match as opposed to previously receiving reimbursements without special conditions and match. The objective for this overtime funding is to assist the traffic and patrol units with increased enforcement for special details dealing with traffic safety. To include DUI emphasis, seat belt enforcement, pedestrian safety detail and other traffic violations. Historically, the Department readily participates in emphasis details with the Washington Traffic Safety Commission, King County Health Department, Federal Way School District, holidays, as well as City events. These types of emphasis detail require extra personnel, administrative staff, equipment and support staff such as transport officers and dispatch personnel. Due to staffing levels, call loads, and budget limitations these events are difficult ifnot impossible to adequately manage. In addition, the availability of planned events and interagency events enable officers to work together in the spirit of cooperation. The City shares a common border with City of Des Moines, we have an existing agreement for one of their BAC (Breath Analyzer Computer) instructors to assist with our training in exchange for our accident investigation assistance. This training dramatically increases the number and quality ofDUI investigations. With day light savings and the holiday season quickly approaching this program allows an opportunity for the Department to provide a high profile presence in our community. Normally, at this time of the year, budgets and staffing levels are limited and would interfere with the ability to carry out special patrol emphasis. The program provides the means to ensure a safer community. Page 1 of2 I/LAURAIMSI AGENDAlPS/O911 oorrRAFFlCEMP AHSIS P A TROLS(DOTS) The Department will provide not less than 25% of the local match which "may include direct and indirect contributions to include time/wages of other assigned officers, supervisory support, dispatchers, vehicle usage or other contributions that may be appropriate." Applications/projects are funded on a first come basis. Attached is a copy ofthe letter and Memorandum of Understanding received from Washington State Traffic Safety Commission. Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve and accept participation and reimbursement for the "Funding for Traffic Safety Emphasis Patrols (DOTS)" from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. APPRO V AL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member Page 2 of 2 I/LAURNMSI AGENDNPS/O911 oorrRAFFICEMPAHSIS P A TROLS(OOTS) ~;i ¡ . , .' . " tI Ie r. : ('-.nf! '..... .. STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 1000 S. Cherry 51., PO Box 40944 . Olympia, Washington 98504-0944 . (360) 753-6197 August 20, 2000 From: Washington State Law Enforcement A~' Les Pope, Senior Program Manager p Funding For Traffic Safety Ernphasis Patrols (DOTS) TO: RE: The Washington Traffic Safety Commission is pleased to announce the availability of continued funding for Traffic Safety Enforcement Emphasis Patrols (commonly referred to as DOTS). The purpose of tlús grant is to assist law enforcement agencies increase their traffic safety enforcement activity and encourage multi-jurisdictional traffic safety enforcement. Due to the previous overwhelming response £rom law enforcement agencies statewide. it has become necessary to impose some guidelines, eligibility criteria and matching fund requirements. Those guidelines are as follows: 1. Applications for funding must include a basic enforcement plan. The plan must contain the following elements: .. A schedule of planned enforcement dates (May be changed later due to operational requirements) to include a list of participating agencies and the number of personnel conunitted to each date. .. The designation of a single «point-of contact" or lead agency for the proposed activi ty/j urisdicti on .. Demonstrated coordination of activity with the Washington State Patrol (WSP) .. A public information plan regarding press releases .. A budget detailing the amount of funds req~ by each participating agency and the proposed matching funds requirement (See #3) .. The purpose of the funding (overtime, benefits, etc.) SEE RESTRICTIONS .. How do you plan to evaluate results? 2. Funding availability is on a federal fiscal year basis, 1 October 2000 to 30 September 2001, and will be based on agency size and the number of full-time commissioned personnel as follows: .. 1-10 Conunissioned Officers .. 11-25 Commissioned Officers . 26 - 50 Commissioned Officers .. 51-100 Commissioned Officers . 101 + Commissioned Officers Up to Up to Up to Up to Up to $1,000 . $2,000 $3,500 $5,000 $10,000 Please provide the number of officers in each participating jurisdictio.n! (j; cl¿}Oo ., " toJ " .', - 3. Funding will be on a "reimbursement" basis and require submission ofa State invoice voucher (Form A-19- attached). Support documents for reimbursement must include signed overtime slips or payroillex~nse records showing payments made and officer activity logs demonstrating performance. . Perfonnance requirements will continue to be three (3) self-initiated contacts per hour of reimbursable time. The use of WTSC funds to reimburse for normal and accustom enforcement (e.g.: collision investigation, back-up for non-traffic related events and dispatched non-emphasis enforcement) is prohibited. . Allowable use of funds will be for overtime salary (@ 1.5 times normal rate), wages and benefits of commissioned personnel in direct support of emphasis patrol activity. Use of funds may extend to dispatcher personnel in direct support of and dedicated to emphasis activity. Funds mav not be used to supplant existing or budgeted personnel, vehicles, vehicle nñleage, police equipment (including radar units & PBTs), court overtime or jail and booking costs.' . Matching funds of not less than 25% of the total grant are required. Matching funds may include direct and indirect contributions to include time/wages of other assigned officers, supervisory support, dispatchers, vehicle usage or other contributions that may be appropriate. 4. Reporting requirements for the lead agency coordinator will require a summary of contacts, number of citations and arrests (by type) of each emphasis patrol submitted within 72 hours of the activity to WTSC. . 5. The WSP receives significant block grant funds for the purpose of enhanced emphasis patrol activity. WSP Districts and detachments are ineligible to apply for these funds. Further, WSP has already done a detailed, district level emphasis enforcement plan. Agencies applying for grant funds are required to coordinate with WSP activities and. where practical, coordinate enforcement efforts. ' 6. To apply to funds: . Submit a work plan, budget and evaluation as described in Section 1 . Each participating agency must sign and return to WTSC, the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOD) before activity begins. . If you have questions about this application process, please feel free to contact me at (360) 586-3872 or e-mail: lpope@wtsc.wa.l!ov PROJECTS ARE FUNDED ON A FIRST-COME BASIS - Please do not delay! Attached: Memorandum of Understanding Activity Log Al9-Invoice Voucher Sample work plan , - MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TIllS AGREEMENT, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW is made and entered into by and between (Agency Name) Hereinafter referred to as "Contractor" and the WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION, hereinafter referred to as "WTSC" IT IS THE PURPOSE OF TIllS AGREEMENf to assist wrse in a project titled: "Traffic Safety Emphasis Patrol Activity" IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. Upon initial application, Contractor (or the designated representative) will submit a detailed work plan (see attached sample) containing a schedule of planned activity, demonstrated coordination with WSP, budget (by agency) and an outcome based evaluation plan based on past activity compared to proposed/estimated activity or goals. 2. wrsc will provide written approval of the work plan and fimd availability before activity begins. 3. Contractor will perfonn emphasis activity as outlined in an approved plan. 4. Contractor will submit for reimbursement in a timely manner (not to exceed 60 days past the billed activity). Billings will include: . Invoice Voucher, A19-1A Form (attached) Please note that we cannot accept a FAX. We must have your agency identified as the "Claimant", a Federal Tax ID # and an ori2inal si2"nature of the a2"encv head., command officer or contractin2" officer on the A-19 form. . Payroll support documents (signed OT slips, payroll documents, etc) . Summary of activities . Officer worksheets - attached (showing 3 or more self-initiated contacts per hour) 5. Disputes arising WIder this agreement shall be resolved by a panel consisting of one representative of the Washington Traffic Safety Commission, one representative from your agency and a mutually agreed upon third PartY. The dispute panel shall thereafter decide the dispute with the majority prevailing. 6. Either party may tenninate this agreement upon (30) days written notice to the other party. In the event of termination of this agreement, the terminating party shall be liable for the performance rendered prior to the effective date of termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. Agency Wasrungton Traffic Safety Commission Return To: Les Pope WTSC PO Box 40944 Olympia, W A 98504-0944 Contracting Agent (Name) Signature Item 5G . ,.1 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT Date: September 11, 2000 From: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee Thomas J. Chaney, Sr., Interim Chief of Police -7j2---- David ~anager Overtime Funding for School Zone Enforcement To: Via: Subject: Background: Due to the success and good works of the Federal Way Police Officers, as well as other state law enforcement agencies, the State has received revenues over the budgeted amount. This unexpected windfall has allowed the Washington Traffic Safety Commission to provide this first time opportunity to all state, county and local law enforcement agencies. The purpose of this new program, "Overtime Funding for School Zone Enforcement," is to protect the lives of children returning to school this fall in our jurisdiction. It is only effective for the first two weeks of the school year and one (1) hour before and after the school day. The Department of Public Safety requests approval to participate in the "Overtime Funding for School Zone Enforcement" program. This will include requesting and accepting reimbursement for overtime expenses as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding (RCW 39.34, Interlocal Cooperation Act). Based upon the 18 Federal Way schools identified and the maximum amount of . qualifying overtime (2 hours per school per day), anticipated reimbursement is approximately $13,882.00. We will request this revenue be appropriated during the 2000 year-end adjustments. Attached is a copy ofthe letter and Memorandum of Understanding received from Washington State Traffic Safety Commission, and the letter of acceptance from Interim Chief Chaney to the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission. On August 22, 2000, an email was sent to the PRHSPS Committee members. This communication outlined the program and opportunity presented to our jurisdiction. Included, were concerns addressing time restraints between the start of the new school year (August 30,2000) and the next PRHSPS Committee meeting of September 11, 2000. Due to this conflict, I presented this issue to the City Manager and received his approval. Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve and accept participation and reimbursement for the "Overtime Funding For School Zone Enforcement" from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. APPROV AL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member I/LAURAIMSI AGENDAIPS/O911 OO/SCHOOLZONEOT " STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 10005. Cherry St., PO Box 40944 . Olympia, Washington 98504-0944 . (360) 753.6197 25 July, 2000 :-.~ ~.~ :'.J .~: 1.. . '.-.. L~' From: Washington State Law Enforcement Agencies Los Pope, Senior Program Manager ~ Overtime Funding For School Zone Enforcement AUG 0 ';' 2GOO TO: i-'.'...".'.' ..._... i_: ,. . . , ' ."." ,...' ~~: RE: The Washington Traffic Safety Commission is pleased to announce the availability of grant funds for overtime school zone enforcement. The purpose of this grant is to protect the lives of children returning to school this fall in !Q!! jurisdiction. Secondarily, (unds will assist law enforcement agencies with limited manpower and increase their traffic safety enforcement activity. The concept is simple, funding is available to put an officer in every school zone in the state. for the hour before and the hour after school for the first 2 weeks of the school year. All state, county and local law enforcement agencies are eligible and encouraged to participate in : this project. It is anticipated that officers will be "asked" to begin shifts early or stay later, much the same as iran arrest were made at the end of shift. Funding for a minimwn 2 hour "call-out" is not available based on the size and scope of this project statewide. The use of commissioned reserve officers is approved as long asa pay structure exists. Funding will be on a <)-eimbursement" basis and require submission of a State invoice voucher (Fonn AI91A-enclosed). Support documents for reimbursement must include signed overtime slips/sheets or payroll/expense records showing payments made and officer activity logs (enclosed) demonstrating perfonnance. See MOU for reimbursement details. Other guidelines for this project are: . A maximwn of 20 hours of overtime per school will be allowed. If a jurisdiction has multiple schools, funding for multiple officers is allowed. . The qualifying factor for a school is the presence of a school zone and crosswalk on a public roadway. Public and private schools may qualify for funding. . Perfonnance requirements will be three (3) self-initiated contacts per hoLir of reimbursable time. . Allowable use of funds will be for overtime salary (@ 1.5 normal salary), wages and benefits of commissioned personnel in direct support of activity. Funds may not be used to supplant existing, on-duty or budgeted personnel, vehicles, vehicle mileage, police equipment, court overtime or jail and booking costs. ' ;'.' "~.=i'~' ., ~ ~J ~ ... + The use ofWTSC funds to reimburse for normal and accustomed enforcement (e.g.: collision investigation, back-up for non-traffic related events and dispatched enforcement) is prohibited. To apply for funding: 1. A letter of "Request for Funding" on agency stationary must be submitted to the Traffic Safety Conunission (See enclosed sample). That letter contains: + A schedule of planned enforcement dates and school names (May be changed later due to operational requirements) to. include the number of personnel committed to each date. + The designation of a single "point of contact" for the proposed activity/jurisdiction (e.g.: chief, sheriff, traffic sergeant, etc) + A public infonnation plan regarding press releases + How do you plan to evaluate results? 2. Each participating agency must sign and return the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOD) original to WTSC. The MOU must be signed by the agency representative with contract si~g authority. A signed copy of the MOD will b~ returned. The returned MOD will be approval with authority to proceed with activity. Reporting requirements for agency coordinators will require a billing to WTSC and a summary of contacts, number of citations and arrests (by type) at each school, submitted within 30 days of completion of the grant period to WTSC. . Activity under this grant project may not be used in conjunction with other, on-going grant projects funded by WTSc. . If you hav:e questions about this application process, please feel free to contact me at (360) 586- 3872 or e-mail: lpope@wtsc.wa.gov Enclosures: Memorandum of Understanding (To be returned) School Safety Emphasis Patrol Activity Log (Submitted. with reimbursement) AI9-IA Invoice Voucher (Required for reimbursement) Sample Grant Request Letter Model school zone signing configuration WAC 392-151-053 (Defines "When Children Are Present") " MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 1000 So. Cheny St., PO Box 40944, Olympia, WA 98504-0944 TIllS AGREEMENT, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW is made and entered into by and between: FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY . Agency naJT1(: Hereinafter referred to as "Contractor" and the W ASBINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION, hereinafter referred to as "wfSC" IT IS THE PURPOSE OF TInS AGREEMENT to provide overtime funding to law enforcem~t agencies to enhance school zone safety by aggressively enforcing school zone speed limits, seatbeltlchild restraint infractions and other school related traffic problems. IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREEDTBAT: 1. Contractor will provide a commissioned police officer (active or paid reserve) with appropriate equipment (vehicle, radar, etc) on an "overtime" basis (not to exceed 1.5 times normal saIarý) to enforce speed statutes under the provisions ofRCW 46.61.440 and seatbelt/child restraint statutes at/around public or private elementary schools. No on-duty personnel will be funded. 2. The period of this activity will begin on the first day of school and extend for the first two weeks of school year during normal school startlend times and may not exceed two hours per day; one hour in the morning. one hour in the afternoon or the busiest time(s) of day. Funding may not exceed 20 hours per school. Jurisdictions may submit for reimbursement of multiple officers for multiple schoollocatioDS. . 3. Performance standards for funded personnel are a minimum of three (3) self-initiated contacts per hour. This is an enforcement activity, it is expected Notices of Infraction (NOl's) will be issued at contact unless circumstances dictate otherwise. 4. It is understood that NOl's issued under this grant-funded activity are not eligible for use with any other grant programs offered by WTSC. 5. Contractor will submit for reimbursement in a timely manner (not to exceed 60 days past the billed activity). Billings will include: . Invoice Voucher, A19-1A Form (attached) Please note that we cannot accept a FAX. We must have!.2!!!: agency identified as the "Claimant", a Federal Tax ID # and an ori1!inal 5Í!roature of the al!encv head, command officer or contractlnl! officer on the A-19 form. . Payroll support documents (overtime slips, payroll documents, etc) . Officer worksheets (showing 3 or more self-initiated contacts per hour) 6. Disputes arising under this agreement shall be resolved by a panel consisting of one representative of the Washington Traffic Safety Commission, one représentative from your agency and a mutually agreed upon third party. The dispute panel shall thereafter decide the dispute with the majority prevailing. 7. Either party may terminate this agreement upon (30) days written notice to the other party. In the event of temùnation of this agreement, the ternùnating party shall be liable for the performance rendered prior to the effective date of termination. -.... . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. APPROVED/pISAPPROVED FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Contractor Agency THOMAS J. CHANEY. INTERIM CHIEF OF POLICE Washington Traffic Safety Commission RETURN TO: WTSC' Attn: Les Pope PO Box 40944 Olympia, W A 98504-0944 Contracting Agent (Name. Rank) 7~/{~~ ", E.D~ (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003-6210 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY August 17, 2000 ~. Les Pope Washington Traffic Safety Commission P. O. Box 40944 Olympia, W A 98504-0944 Dear ~. Pope: RE: OVERTIME FUNDING FOR SCHOOL ZONE ENFORCEMENT The Federal Way Department of Public Safety is requesting to participate in the Commission's overtime school zone enforcement grant project. Our agency anticipates providing officers for each school within the City of Federal Way. Attached is a list of all the schools that will be involved in the program. Lieutenant John Stray from the Traffic Unit has been designated to represent the Department for - this project, and may be contacted by calling (253) 661-4620. Before school starts, a press release will be made informing the public of our enforcement intentions and upon completion of the project. An evaluation of the project will be conducted comparing the number of citizen and school complaints from previous years to this year. Attached is a signed Memorandum of Understanding, and a list of applicable schools. We look forward to once again working with the Washington Traffic Safety Commission in making Federal Way a safer place to live. Sincerely. d ~;~aneY, s~ Interim Chief of Police :lc ED~ (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003-6210 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY The following schools will be from 7 to 8 AM, and 2 to 3 PM, Sept. 5 to Sept. 15, 2000: Illahee Jr. High School Lakota Jr. High School Sacajawea Jr. High School Saghalie Jr. High School The following schools will be from 8 to 9 AM, and 3 to 4 PM, Sept. 5 to Sept. 15,2000: Brigadoon Elementary Enterprise Elementary Green Gables Elementary Lake Grove Elementary Mirror Lake Elementary Silver Lake Elementary Twin Lakes Elementary The following schools will be from 8:30 to 9:30 AM, and 3:30 to 4:30 PM, Sept. 5 to 15,2000. Adelaide Elementary Mark Twain Elementary Nautilus Elementary Olympic View Elementary Panther Lake Elementary Sherwood Forest Elementary Wildwood Elementary