Loading...
17-100199FILE AkCITY OF Federal Way February 13, 2016 Lisa Klein AHBL, Inc. 2215 North 30"' Street, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403 1k1ein@ahh1. corn CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re: File #17-100199-00-PC, PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY FWPS New Elementary School, Parcel's 042104-9100, 042104-9119, 042104-9123, 042104- 9039, 042104-9084, and 042104-9162, Federal Way Dear Ms. Klein: Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development Review Committee (DRC) held February 2, 2017. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting was helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted. This letter summarizes comments given to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC. The members who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff from the City's Planning and Building Divisions and Public Works Department, and representatives fi-om Lakehaven Water and Sewer District and South King Fire and Rescue. Some sections of the Fecleral lVay Remised Code (FWRC) and relevant information handouts are enclosed with this letter. Please be advised, this letter does not represent all applicable codes. In preparing your formal application, please refer to the complete FWRC and other relevant codes for all additional requirements that may apply to your project. The key contact for your project is Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641, beck_y.chapin@cityoffederalway.com. For specific technical questions about your project, please contact the appropriate DRC representative as listed below. Otherwise, any general questions about the preapplication and permitting process can be referred to your key contact. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposal to construct new elementary school, including approximately 50,000 square -foot building, parking, and multi -purpose play field. MAJOR ISSUES Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and information submitted for preapplication review. These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in the plans. These major issues only represent comments that the DRC consider most significant to your project and do not include the majority of the comments provided. The major issues section is only provided as a means to highlight critical requirements or issues. Please be sure to read the entire department comments made in the next section of this letter. Ms. Klein February 13.2017 Pace 2 • Planning Division 1. The proposed site contains critical areas: wetland, wetland buffer, and geologically hazardous areas. A Critical Areas Report including wetland and geotechnical analysis will be required. 2. Process IV 'Hearing Examiner' review required for intrusions into the wetland and building setback/height variance request. Public Works Traffic Division 1. Transportation Concurrency Management (FWRC 19.90) — Transportation concurrency permit with application fee of S8.505.50 is required for the proposed project. 2. Traffic Impact Fees (FWRC 19.91) — Traffic impact fees are required for elementary schools. 3. Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) — A TIA prepared by a licensed engineer in Washington is required to assess other significant project impacts and determine traffic and safety mitigation measures not identified in the concurrency analysis. The TIA shall also include trip generation to determine the number of trips generated by the development. 4. Frontage Improvements (FWRC 19.135.040) — Construct street frontage improvements along the property frontage on Military Road S. 5. Access Management (FWRC 19.135.260) — The development shall meet access management standards. DEPARTMENT COMINIENTS Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the preapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions; please contact the representative listed for that section. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT —PLANNING DIVISION Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641, Becky.Cha )in(&cityoffederalway.com 1 _ Land Use Review Process — The zoning of the subject site is Neighborhood Business (BN) and Multi -family Residential (RM3600). Both the BN and RM zoninQ districts permit school uses pursuant to FWRC 19.215.040 and 19205.130, respectively. The required review process for the project is Process Ill; Project Approval. However, proposed development within wetlands must be reviewed through Process IV, Hearing Examiner. in addition, any building'height or setback variance request will be reviewed and decided upon through Process IV, with the exception of an administrative variance which requires Process Ill review, see FWRC Chapter 19.45, Variances. Process IV is an administrative review conducted by city staff, with a final decision issued by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. The Process IV decision criteria are contained in FWRC 19.70.1502(a)-(f). Development within wetlands decision criteria is contained in FWRC 19.145.430(2) and variance decision criteria are contained in FWRC 19.45.030. Prior to the Process iV public hearing, the Director of Community Development Services will issue a decision under FWRC Chapter 19.1 15. Community Design Guidelines; related to building and site design, and the CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) principles in conjunction 1 7-100100-00-IT Doc ID 7>791 N/Is. Klein February 13.2017 Ilm—,e 3 with the Process Ill land use decision. The Director's design decision is appealable to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner. State Environmental PolicvAct (SEPA) review is processed concurrently with Process Ill and Process IV applications, with initial public notice of application being issued after determination of complete applications. Following issuance of a SEPA decision and the Process III and design guideline decision, the Hearing Examiner conducts a public hearing for a Process IV application(s) and issues a written decision(s). A Process III and Process IV development submittal requirements checklist and master land use application are enclosed. Building permits can be issued after land use approval is granted and appeal periods concluded. Aleeting Follow-up: At the meeting the question as to whether a Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone is required was mentioned. The City is not requiring that the site be rezoned as both the BN and RM zones allow schools. State Environmental Police Act (SEPA) — The project is subject to environmental review under the Stale Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as the proposed development is larger than 12,000 sq. ft. and located on lands covered by water pursuant to Washington Adininistrative Code (WAC) 197-1 1- 800(1). The school district may act as Lead Agency for SEPA purposes, or may request the City to assume Lead Agency. The City recommends consultation early in the process to determine Lead Agencv. If the City serves as the Responsible Official for the environmental review, an environmental checklist must be submitted and reviewed prior to the City issuing an environmental threshold determination. All property owners within 300 feet of the site are notified of that decision. The notification includes a 14-day comment and 21-day appeal period. SEPA review must be concluded before land use approval may be granted. if the school district acts as Lead Agency, the City must agree and recommends consultation between staff and the district to identify any mitigation that may be needed prior to issuing a threshold determination. In any case, the SEPA checklist must be submitted for review with the land use application. However, SEPA review fees would not be required if the City is not the lead agency. Boundary Line Adjustment— As proposed, the site plan depicts a building over property lines. Buildings cannot be built over property lines. Therefore, a Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) is required to eliminate the interior property lines due to building and zoning codes. A BLA is a minor alteration in the location of lot boundaries on existing lots. Pursuant to FWRC Chapter 18.10 "Boundary Line Adjustments", BLA applications are administratively processed. Please note that the BLA process runs concurrently with the land use process; however, the BLA must be approved by the Director of Community Development and recorded at King County before issuance of any new building permits. 4. Public Notification — The Use Process applications and SEPA determinations require three separate notices (Notice of Application, SEPA, and Notice of Public Hearing). Within 14 days of issuing the Letter of Complete Application, a Notice of Application will be published in the Federal Way 1111i1'ror, mailed to persons within 300 feet of the subject property, posted on the subject property, and placed at the City's three designated notice boards. The applicant is responsible for posting a public notification sign prepared by the City (if Process IV is involved). Notice will be given in the same 17-I00199-00-P(' Doe ID 7i241 ivls. Klein February li_ 2017 Pagc d format for the Citv's SEPA determination and Notice of Public Hearing 14 days prior to the public hearing date. The applicant is required to submit three (3) sets of stamped mailing envelopes to persons receiving tax statements within 300 feet of the subject property. The City's GIS Division provides this service for a nominal fee or the applicant may provide their own mailing envelopes via King County Assessor records or title company. Please find the enclosed mailingglabels bulletin for further information. Application Fees — Please contact the Permit Center at 253-835-2607 for the following review fees applicable for your project: • Process III Project Approval ■ Process iV Hearing Examiner Decision • Process IV Variance • SEPA w/ project (if City is Lead Agency) • Boundary Line Adjustment • Notice board and • Concurrency This list does not include building permit, engineering review, inspection, traffic impact, and other fees that may be applicable prior, concurrent, or following building construction. 6. Environmentally Critical Areas — The subject property contains critical areas and/or associated buffers: wetland and geologically hazardous areas (GHA). Pursuant to FWRC 19.145.080, a critical areas report that adequately evaluates the proposal and probable impacts is required. The report must also demonstrate that all reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to the critical areas per FWRC 19.145.130 "Mitigation Sequencing." The applicant is responsible for covering the cost of the City's consultants who may review the reports per FWRC 19.145.080(3). Wetlands — Delineation and rating of the on -site wetland will be required to determine the exact impacts to the wetland and wetland buffer. See FWRC 19.145.410-420 for wetland delineation and rating standards. Pursuant to FWRC 19.145.430. any development or improvement within a wetland will require Hearing Examiner approval administered via Process IV Master Land Use application, public hearing, and decision by the City's Hearing Examiner. The applicant will have the burden of designing the development within the wetland to meet the following decisional criteria: a) It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities; b) It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards; c) It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the City as a whole, including the loss of open space; d) It will result in no net loss of wetland area, function or value upon completion of compensatory mitigation; e) The project is in the best interest of the public health, safety or welfare; f) The applicant has demonstrated sufficient scientific expertise and supervisory capability to carry out the project; and n-u 0$99.00-K Doc I 7r'91 Ms. Klein February 13. 2017 Paoc 5 g) The applicant is committed to monitoring the project and to making corrections if the project fails to meet projected goals. Any development within the wetland will require Hearing Examiner approval of a mitigation plan encompassing the items listed in FWRC 19.145.140 and FWRC 19.145.430(3-7). Acceptable methods to mitigate wetland impacts include creation, re-establishment, rehabilitation, and enhancement of in -kind wetland types within the sarne drainage basin. Alternative mitigation methods including an approved in -lieu fee program or mitigation bank, and/or advanced migration, are discretionary and may become an option following an operating agreement between the City and mitigation receiving area. Meeling Follovv-vp: You may choose to work with King County to establish alternative mitigation methods as outlined in FWRC. I've included a contact for King County's Mitigation Reserves Program; see attached handouts. Geologically Hnzardotrs Arens —Geologically Hazardous Areas (GHA), landslide hazard areas, exist on site. Per FWRC 19.05.070, G definition, landslide hazard areas are those areas potentially subject to episodic downslope movement of a mass of soil or rock including but not limited to, the following areas: a) Any area with a combination of- i. Slopes greater than 15 percent; ii. Permeable sediment, predominately sand and gravel, overlying relatively impermeable sediment or bedrock, typically silt and clay; and ill. Springs or groundwater seepage. b) Any area that has shown movement during the Holocene epoch, from 10,000 years ago to the present, or that is underlain by mass wastage debris of that epoch. c) Any area potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision, stream bank erosion or undercutting by wave action. d) Any area located in a ravine or on an active alluvial fan, presently or potentially subject to inundation by debris flows or flooding. e) Those areas mapped as Class U (unstable), UOS (unstable old slides), and URS (unstable recent slides) by the Department of Ecology's Coastal Zone Atlas. f) Areas designated as quaternary slumps, earthflows, mudflows, lahars, or landslides on maps published by the U.S. Geological Survey or Washington State Department of Natural Resources. g) Slopes having gradients greater than 80 percent subject to rockfall during seismic shaking. h) Any area with a -slope of 40 percent or steeper and with a vertical relief of 10 or more feet except areas composed of consolidated rock. A slope is delineated by establishing its toe and top and is measured by averaging the inclination over at least 10 feet of vertical relief. The Director may permit development activities on or within 50 feet of a geologically hazardous area if the development will not be at risk of damage due to the geologic hazard and will not lead to or create any increased slide, seismic or erosion hazard. Pursuant to FWRC 19.145.250, a geotechnical report prepared by a geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist licensed with the state is required in addition to the critical areas report. The report must describe how each of the proposed developments will impact or be impacted by the following on the property and nearby properties: i. Slope stability, landslide hazard, and slouzhing; 17-100 N9-00-PC Doc ID.7,'oI Ms. Klein February 13, 2017 Pace 6 ii. Seismic hazards; Ili. Groundwater; iv. Seeps, springs and other surface waters; and V. Existing vegetation. 7. Tacoma Smelter Plume — The subject property is located in the Tacoma Smelter Plume detect area containing 20.1 ppm to 40.0 ppm arsenic and lead concentration. Please contact Department of Ecology regarding the Voluntary Soil Clean -Up Program. The City will require soil testing and soil cleanup (if applicable) as a component of the SEPA and land use review and site development. 8. Key Development Regulations — All site improvements must comply with the applicable FWRC development regulations. The following general regulations apply to the different geographic portions of the proposal. Zone BN RM Required Yards, 50 ft. 50 1t. Front, Side, Rear 30 ft. for structures located less than 100 ft. from a residential zone. 55 ft. above average building elevation for gyms if located 100 55 ft. above average building ft. or more fi-om an adjacent Height of elevation for gyms if located 100 ft. residential zone. Structure or more from an adjacent residential zone. For all other structures, in RM 3.6 zones, 30 ft. above average 35 ft. above average building building elevation. elevation for all other structures. Elementary/Middle: 1 parking Elementary/Middle: 1 parking Parking space for each employee space for each employee Maxinnan Lot None 75% Coverage Special Regulations and Notes: BN Zone ■ School may include one accessory living facility. • Schools must comply with the requirements of the State Department of Social and Health Services and/or the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. • All activities pertaining to schools, such as auto repair or other uses that may impact adjacent properties, must take place within an enclosed building. • If any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of 20 ft. from the property line of the residential zone. • For schools, with the exception of gyms, the height of a structure may exceed 35 ft. above average building elevation to a maximum of 40 ft., if all of the following criteria are met: a) The structure is located 100 ft. or more from an adjacent residential zone. 17-100197-00-PC Doc I1):7>_91 Ms. Klein February 13, 2017 Pa-e 7 b) The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and, c) Each required yard abutting the structure is increased five ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and d) The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. For schools, including gyms, an increase in height above 35 ft. shall not block views designated by the comprehensive plan. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. Site design, including the location of parking and passenger loading areas shall be designed to reduce impacts on nearby residential areas. Special Regarlotions ono' Motes: RM Zone • This use may locate on the subject property only if it will not be detrimental to the character of the nei;hborhood in which it is located and: a) it will serve the immediate area in which it is located; or b) The subject property is adjacent to a collector or arterial right-of-way. • if the use will serve children, the subject property must contain an outdoor play area with at least 75 sq. ft. for each child using the area at any one time. This play area must be completely enclosed by a solid fence or other screen at least six ft. in height. Play equipment and structured play areas may not be in required yards. • Hours of operation and maximum number of attendees may be limited by the City to reduce impact on nearby residential uses. • The City may require an on -site passenger loadin,g area, depending on the number and nature of attendees and the extent and nature of existing street improvements. • Site design, including the location of parking and passenger loading areas shall be designed to reduce impacts on nearby residential uses. • All activities pertaining to schools, such as auto repair or other uses that may impact adjacent properties, must take place within an enclosed building. • For all structures except gyms, if any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent low density zone, then either: a) The height of that portion of the structure shall not exceed 15 ft. above average building elevation; or b) The facade of that portion of the structure parallel to the low density zone shall not exceed 50 ft. in length. :• For all structures except gyms, if the structure is located 100 ft. or more from an adjacent low density zone, the maximum height may be increased to 40 ft. if all of the following criteria are m et: a) The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building-, and b) Each required yard abutting the structure is increased five ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 30 ft. above average building elevation. • For any structure, including gyms, an increase in height above 30 ft. in RM 3.6 shall not block views designated by the comprehensive plan. ■ May include accessory living facilities for one staff person. 17-1CIO I99-n0-P(. Doe IU•7�19I Ms. Mein February 13. 2017 Page 3 This use must comply with the requirements of the State Department of Social and Health Services and/or the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. Minor and supporting structures constructed as a functional requirement of schools may exceed the applicable height limitation provided that the director of community development determines that such structures will not significantly impact adjacent properties. Variance Request— As depicted on the proposed site plan, the building intrudes into the required yard setbacks. In addition, it was mentioned at the meeting that the building height may exceed the maximum height of structure allowed. As such, the applicant may apply for a variance pursuant to FWRC Chapter 19.45 `Variances.' It is the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate how the criteria set forth in FWRC 19.45.030, will be met. 9. Landscaping — A landscape plan prepared by a Washington State licensed landscape architect shall be submitted with the formal application. It must depict perimeter and interior parking lot landscaping requirements under FWRC Chapter 19.125 as follows: a. Perimeter Lancniseaping— Pursuant to FWRC 19.125.060(3), Multifcznnily Residential, RM Type IiI landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along all public rights -of -way and ingress/egress easements; and Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines. Pursuant to FWRC 19.125.060(5), Neighborhood Bznsi7ness, BN, Type Iii landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all properties abutting public rights-of-��-ay and ingress/egress easements; Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district; and Type 111 landscaping five feet in width along all perimeter lot lines except as noted in subsections (5)(a) and (b) of this section. For your information, per FWRC 19.125.50, Type III landscaping is a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees, large shrubs, and groundcover, spaced to provide a visual buffer creating a partial visual separation and Type 1 landscaping shall consist of evergreen trees, tall shrubs, and groundcover, which will provide a 100 percent sight obscuring screen within three years from the time of planting. b. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping— Interior lot landscaping per parking space is required in accordance with FWRC 19.125.070, "Parking Lot Landscaping." Type IV landscaping is required to be installed at the ends of all rows of parking and disbursed throughout the interior parking area, in the amount of twenty square feet per parking stall when up to 49 parking stall area provided and twenty-two square feet per parking stall when 50 or more parking stalls are provided. The square footage of each interior parking lot landscaping must be depicted on the landscape plan. Only those landscape areas that are adjacent to a parking stall will qualify as interior parking lot landscaping. Light standards may not take the place of required trees in parking lot landscape islands. Pursuant to FWRC 19.125.50(4), Type IV landscaping shall consist of trees planted with supporting shrubs and groundcover. Shrubs shall be pruned at 40 inches in height, and the lowest tree branches shall be pruned to keep an eight -foot clearance from the ground. One tree per landscape island up to 150 square feet shall be planted. 17_100190-00-IT Doc ID 75''91 IMs. Klein February 13.2017 Page 9 10. Clearing, Grading, Tree and Vegetation Retention — The proposal is subject to the provisions of FWRC 19.120, "Clearing, Grading, and Vegetation and Tree Retention." A clearing and grading plan that meets FWRC 19.120.020 and FWRC 19.120.040 must be submitted with the formal land use applications. The site is subject to tree density requirements of FWRC 19.120.130(l ); note that 20 tree -units per acre are required for BN zoned site and 30 tree units per acre for multi -family zoned sites, minus any proposed public or private streets and regulated critical areas. Trees located within critical area buffers (but not within the wetland itselt) can be credited towards satisfying the tree units per acre requirement. Tree unit credits are in table 2 of FWRC 19.120.130-2. A tree unit is a value assigned to existing trees retained on the property or replacement trees. The larger the tree, the greater value it is assigned. Required tree density can be composed of retained trees and replacement plantings per FWRC 19.120.130. (Note: required landscaping trees may be counted in tree density.) The tree and vegetation plan must clearly show where the tree units are to be located. The tree and vegetation retention/replacement plan must be prepared by a certified arborist or certified landscape architect and must include information about tree unit credits and replacement. 11. Forest Practices Permit — The City has assumed jurisdiction over the review and approval of Class IV -General Forest Practices permits. A forest practices application form must be completed if more than 5,000 board feet of merchantable timber is harvested from the subject property. This is approximately equal to one log truck of timber. The City will review the proposed Class IV -General Forest Practices in conjunction with the Land Use application. Please include details of such activity in the environmental checklist as the Class IV permit is not exempt from SEPA review. 12. Community Design Guidelines — The new school is subject to an administrative design review as a component of the Use Process application pursuant to FWRC Chapter 19.115, `Co717n1Z/77iry Design Guidelines.' Project designers shall strive for overall design continuity by using similar elements throughout the project such as architectural style and features, materials, colors; and textures. Building and site design for institutional uses is guided by FWRC 19.1 15.100. Please include a written narrative identifying how the project complies with all applicable design guidelines. Several guidelines applicable to your project are below. A. Site Design for all zoning districts — [Fi;VRC 19.115.050] • Vehicle turning movements shall be minimized. Parking aisles without loop access are discouraged. Parking and vehicle circulation areas shall be clearly delineated using directional signage. • Driveways shall be located to be visible from the right-of-way but not impede pedestrian circulation on site or to adjoining properties. Driveways should be shared with adjacent properties to minimize the number of driveways and curb cuts. • Primary entrances to buildings should be clearly visible or recognizable from the right-of- way. Pedestrian pathways from rights -of -way and bus stops to primary entrances, from parking lots to primary entrances, and pedestrian areas, shall be accessible and should be clearly delineated. • Pedestrian pathways and pedestrian areas should be delineated by separate paved routes using a variation in paved texture and color, and protected from abutting vehicle circulation areas with landscaping. Approved methods of delineation include: stone, brick or granite pavers; 17-100 190-00-i,c Doc iu ;,,) i Ms. Klein 1=ehruary 13. 2017 Page 10 exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete. Paint striping on asphalt as a method of delineation is not encouraged. B. Bzrilding design for all zoning clisiricts — [FWRC 19.115. 060] • Bzd1dingfagade rnodzrlation anarscreening. Building facades longer than 60 feet that are visible from the right-of-way and residential zones must provide two of four specific design treatments: (1) facade modulation, (2) landscape screening, (3) canopy or arcade, and (4) pedestrian plaza. Please note that if three facade treatment options are incorporated, dimensional flexibility can be provided. ■ Building articulation ancI scale. Please refer to the various options for building facade articulation. Provide additional treatment for the facades to eliminate the large sections of wall devoid of wall treatment. C. Zone Specific Reyzrirements: [FWRC 19.115.090 (1)(a), (h), (e), (f . (11), and (i)J • Surface parking may be located between the building and the right-of-way provided that parking located between the building and the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation. • Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of-way, and shall incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. • Ground level mirrored or reflective glass is not allowed adjacent to ROW or pedestrian area. • If utilized, chain link fences visible from public ROW or adjacent properties and not screened by Type I landscaping shall be vinyl coated mesh with architectural pole caps and decorative grid pattern. Parking lots should be broken up into rows containing no more than 10 adjacent stalls, separated by planting areas. • Pedestrian walkways (minimum six feet wide) shall be provided bet�vveen the interior of the project and the public sidewalk. D. 177stilLrtiOnLrl Uses — [FWRC 19.115.1001 ■ Building facades that exceed 120 feet in length and are visible from rights -of -way and residential zones shall incorporate a significant structural modulation (offset). The minimum depth of the modulation shall be approximately equal to 10 percent of the total length of the subject facade and the minimum width shall be approximately twice the minimum depth. The modulation shall be integral to the building structure from base to roofline. • Roof design shall utilize forms and materials that avoid the general appearance of a "flat" roof. Rooflines with an integral and obvious architectural pitch are an approved method to meet this guideline. Alternative distinctive roof forms such as varied and multiple stepped rooflines, architectural parapets, articulated cornices and fascias, arches, eyebrows, and similar methods will be considered by the director; provided, that the roof design minimizes uninterrupted horizontal planes and results in architectural and visual appeal. E. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) — Pursuant to FWRC 19.1 15.010(2), the implementation ofCPTED principles (Natural Surveillance, Access Control, and Ownership) is required for all new development projects. The enclosed CPTED checklist must be submitted with the formal land use application. 17-100199-00-PC Doc ID 7:`)I Ms. Klein February 13.2017 Page I I F. Livhling— Proposed lighting must be shown on the site plan or a separate sheet. In addition to CPTED lighting standards, the following shall apply per FWRC 19.115.050(7) and FWRC 19.1 15.100(7): lighting levels shall not spill onto adjacent properties; lighting shall be provided in all loading, storage, and circulation areas; lighting standards shall not reduce the amount of landscaping required for the project; and lighting fixtures should not exceed 30 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. 13. Loading, Storage, Trash, and Recycling Facilities — These shall be located, designed, and screened for minimal noise and aesthetic impacts to vehicle and pedestrian circulation areas. FWRC 19.125.040 contains general landscaping requirements for loading areas. Exterior trash receptacles and recycling are subject to architectural and/or landscape screening requirements and total area requirements per FWRC 19.125.150. Trash facilities may not be located in required yards (setback areas) or required landscape buffers. Solid waste and recycling facilities must be provided in the amount of three square feet of storage space for every 1.000 square feet of gross floor area, with a minimum area of 65 square feet. and a maximum of 1,000 square feet. Entry gates for garbage and recycling facilities are typically 20 feet in width to allow for service pickup. Refer to comments in the Public Works section of this letter. 14. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment — FWRC 19.1 10.070 requires vents, mechanical and elevator equipment, and similar appurtenances that extend above the roofline to be architecturally screened from public view, with a corresponding elevation detail provided with the formal application. PUBLIC WORKS —DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, Kevin.Petersonocityouffederalway.com Land Use Issues — Stormwater Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the 2016 King County Surface Wales' Desig» Manual (KCSWDM) and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the manual. This project meets the requirements for a Full Drainage Review. At the time of land use site plan submittal, a preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR), addressing the relevance of the project to the nine core and five special requirements of the KCSWDM will be required. A Level i downstream analysis shall also be provided in the preliminary TIR. The City Addendum can be found at the following website: www.cityoffederalway.com/node/1467. 2. The project lies within a Conservation flow control area, thus the applicant must design the flow control facility to rneet this performance criteria. In addition to flow control facilities, Best Management Practices (BMP's) are required as outlined in the KCSWDM. The project also lies within an Enhanced Basic Water Quality Area. Water Quality Treatment shall be designed to meet the treatment criteria of the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Menu. 3. if infiltration is proposed, soil logs prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer or septic designer must be provided to verify infiltration suitability. 4. Detention and water- quality facilities for private commercial developments outside the City Center Core should be above ground (i.e. open pond). 17-100199-00-PC Doc ID 7S'_91 Ms. Klein February 13_ 2017 Pa"c 1? 5. Show the proposed location and dimensions of the detention and water quality facilities on the preliminary plans. 6. If more than one acre will be disturbed during construction, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) construction storm waterpermit may be required. Information regarding this permit can be obtained from the Washington State Department of Ecology at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/index.litml or by calling 360-407- 6048. Right -of -Way Improvements 1. See the Traffic Division comments from Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer, for traffic related items. 2. if dedication of additional right-of-way is required to install street frontage improvements, the dedication shall be conveyed to the City through a statutory warranty deed. The dedicated area must have clear title prior to recording. 3. All stormwater treatment and detention requirements outlined above may apply to any improvements within the public right-of-way. Building Permit Issues Engineered plans are required for clearing, grading, road construction, and utility work. Plans must be reviewed and approved by the City. Engineering review fees are S2,430.00 for the first 18 hours of review for Commercial building permits and full subdivision EN permits. Additional review time is charged at $135.00 per hour. A final TIR shall be prepared for the project and submitted with the engineering plans. Both the TIR and the plans will require the signature/seal of a professional engineer registered/licensed in the State of Washington. The Federal Way Palblic Works Developrnenl Stuncicnrcis Mcanral (including standard detail drawings, standard notes, and engineering checklists) is available on the City's website at: www.citvoffederalway.com/node/1467 to assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and TI R. 3. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans, the vertical datum block shall include the phrase "DATUM: N.G.V.D.-29" or "DATUM: K.C.A.S.," on all sheets where vertical elevations are called out. 4. Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" paper. Site plans shall be drawn at a scale of I" = 20', or larger. Architectural scales are not permitted on engineering plans. 5. Provide cut and till quantities on the clearing and grading plan. 6. Temporary Erosion and Sediment -control (TESL) measLII-CS, per Appendix D of the KCSWDM, just be shown on the engineering plans. 7. The site plan shall show the location of any existing and proposed utilities in the areas affected by COI1Stl-LIC6011. 17-100Iv9-nn-PC' Doc ID 75'_91 M vls. Klein Februan 13.2017 Pai,e 13 PUBLIC WORKS —TRAFFIC DIVISION Erik Preston, 253-835-2744, erik.preston@citvoffederalway.com Transportation Concurrency Analysis (FWRC 19.90) Based on the submitted materials for 50,000 square feet of elementary school and credit for one single-family residential home. the Institute of Transportation Engineers (I.TE) Trip Generation - 8"' Edition, land use code 520 (Elementary School), and 210 (Single -Family Detached Housing), the proposed project is estimated to generate approximately 60 new weekday PM peak hour trips. Alternatively, the applicant may submit a site specific trip generation study for the proposed development. 2. A Concurrency permit is required for this development project. The PW Traffic Division will perform Concurrency analysis to determine if adequate roadway capacity exists during the weekday PM peak period to accommodate the proposed development. Please note that supplemental transportation analysis and Concurrency mitigation may be required if the proposed project creates an impact not anticipated in the six -year Transportation improvement Plan (TiP). 3. The estimated fee for the concurrency permit application is $8.505.50 (51 — 500 Trips). This fee is an estimate and based on the materials submitted for the pre -application meeting. The concurrency application fee must be paid in frill at the time the concurrency permit application is submitted with land use application. The fee may change based on the new weekday PM peak hour trips as identified in the concurrency trip generation. The applicant has the option of having an independent traffic engineer prepare the concurrency analysis consistent with City procedures; however, the fee remains the same. Transportation Impact Fees (TIF) (FWRC 19.91) Based on the submitted materials for 50,000 square feet of elementary school and credit for 1 single- family home, the estimated traffic impact fee is S88,995.78. Please note, the actual impact fee will be calculated based on the fee schedule in effect at the time a completed building perm -nit application is tiled and paid prior to permit issuance (FWRC 19.100.070 3(a)). Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) (FWRC 19.135) I . A Traffic Impact Analyses (TIA) to identify transportation impacts of development projects and provide appropriate mitigation measures is required. The TIA shall assess additional project impacts beyond those that were identified under the concurrency permit process conducted by the City. Mitigation improvements necessary beyond those identified in the TIP to meet the City's adopted level -of -service standards shall be provided by the applicant. 2. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by engineer licensed in the state of Washington is required for tills development project. The engineer should contact the Traffic Division for a scoping sheet in the initial stages of their study. The TIA should include the following analysis: ■ A specialized land use trip generation study ■ Analysis of intersections impacted by 100 trips in the weekday morning and weekday afternoon peak hours ■ Signal warrant analysis 17-1001 9o-00-IT Doc I D 7�'_91 Nqs. Klein February 13. 2017 Pa-e I d Turn lane warrant analysis at site accesses Queuing analysis of access points for morning and afternoon peak hours. Street Frontage Improvements (FWRC 19.135) The applicant/owner would be expected to construct street improvements consistent with the planned roadway cross -sections as shown in Map III-4 in Chapter IiI of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) shown as Table III-10 (FWRC 19.135.040). Based on the materials submitted, staff conducted a limited analysis to determine the required street improvements. The applicant would be expected to construct improvements on the following streets to the City's planned roadway cross -sections: ■ Military Road S is a Minor Arterial planned as a Type "G" street, consisting of a 66-foot street with curb and gutter, six-foot planter strips with street trees, 8-foot sidewalks, and street lights in a 100-foot right-of-way (ROW). Assuming a symmetrical cross section, no ROW dedication and half -street improvements are required as measured from the street centerline OR far side edge of travel way. 2. The applicant may be required to dedicate additional right-of-way (ROW) to accommodate additional turn lane improvements if identified in the transportation impact analysis and/or property corner radius. 3. The applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director to modify, defer, or waive the required street improvements (FWRC 19.1 35.070). Information about right-of-way modification requests is available through the Public Works Development Services Division. These modification requests have a nominal review fee currently at $290 ($270.00 plus $20 recording fee). 4. Tapers and transitions beyond the project frontage may be required as deemed necessary for safety purposes, taper rate shall be WS^2/60 or as directed by the Public Works Director. Access Management (FWRC 19.135) 1. Access management standards are based on roadway safety and capacity requirements. FWRC 19.135.280 provides access standards for streets based on planned roadway cross -sections. Please note that access classifications are per Drawing 3-1 A in the Public Works Development Standards. Please show all neighboring driveways within 150 feet of the proposed driveway(s) on both sides of the street. Per FWRC 19.135 280, there may be only one driveway for each 330 feet of lot frontage. This property does not have the 990 feet minimum street frontage to allow a third access. Additionally, driveways must be located no closer than 150 feet to any street intersection or to any other driveway, whether on or off the subject property. Driveways may be aligned with driveways on the opposite side of the street. The city may further limit or prohibit access to or from driveways on arterial streets as deems appropriate for safety. 4. Military Road S is Access Class " 3", which permits full access as close as 150 feet to any other street intersection or driveway, whether on or off the subject property. It cannot be determined if the current 17-100199_00_PC- Doc 11) 75291 Ms. Klein February 13. 2017 Pane 15 proposal meets access management standards. Additional detail is required to make a determination; the proposal may need to be modified. 5. The director may grant a modification administratively to reduce spacing standards by up to 20 percent of the tabular values with supporting documentation (FWRC 19.135.290). Please note that these modification requests have a nominal review fee of $290. Once preliminary traffic queuing analysis has been completed, the applicant's traffic engineer may submit a written request for access modification if desired. 6. For driveways that serve uses other than single-family residential uses and zero lot line townhouse developments, the maximum driveway width is 30 feet for a two-lane two-way driveway and 40 feet for a three -lane two-way driveway (FWRC 19.135.270). Driveway widths may be increased in order to provide adequate width for vehicles that may be reasonably expected to use the driveway, as determined by the Public Works Director. Misc. Safety related Comments l . Locating elementary schools adjacent to arterial streets is not recommended due to the high traffic volumes of arterials. Military Road S poses additional concerns with a posted speed limit of 40 mph and no existing turn lanes. In particular, the chances of serious injury or death increase exponentially for -pedestrians involved in collisions with vehicles traveling over 20 mph, let alone 40 mph. The applicant must submit a Vehicle Turning Diagram to the Public Works Traffic Division. This diagram will show how the appropriate design vehicle (such as: Bus, Garbcg e Truck) can enter, maneuver, and leave the site without encroaching onto opposing traffic lanes or mounting a curb. 3. A pedestrian crossing treatment such as an RRFB or full pedestrian signal may be required along the school frontage to facilitate safe pedestrian crossing, especially if the attendance area will include areas west of Military Road S and south of S 288°i Street. 4. Sidewalk or other frontage improvements may be required offsite on Military Road S or other streets to provide safe walking routes to the school. Such sidewalks would need to be constructed in the ultimate location for the planned cross-section of that street. School Speed Zone Flashers, signals, signage, and markings will likely be required to establish a school speed zone along Military Road S and would be the responsibility of the applicant to fund and install. 6. The City will monitor traffic conditions (queuing, collisions, etc.) on Military Road S and shall reserve the right to limit access to right -in and right -out at such time deemed necessary. PUBLIC WORKS — SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING DIVISION Rob Van Orsow, 253-835-2770, robv(a�cityoffederalway.com Solid Waste & Recycling Design Considerations Solid waste and recycling design considerations include: 17-1001„9-00-Irc Doc ID 752yI Ms. Klein February 13. 20 17 Page 16 Space Required and Enclosure Basics • Adequate space allocation for interior and exterior garbage, recycling, food waste, waste oil, yard debris, hazardous waste, or biohazard collection containers. Minimum recycling space allocation is established by FWRC 19.125.150. Note that this typically makes up only about 1/3 of the combined space needed for solid waste and recycling containers combined. • In general, per unit services costs are lower for larger containers emptied less frequently. Sites that do not allow ample space for containers will tend to have higher service costs over the long term. • Basic solid waste and recycling services can be accommodated within a single enclosure with clear interior dimensions measuring 10' deep by 20' across. A two -door swing -open or roll -open gate should span the front of the enclosure. When gate doors are opened, no structure or hardware Should remain above Grade across the enclosure opening. Gate pins/holes are preferred for holding gates in both closed and open positions to ease service access and maximize the life of gate hardware. • Sites may require a larger enclosure, or multiple enclosures, to accommodate on -site user access and/or additional waste types and containers. • Plan for user access to interior waste and recycling stora�(ye areas/containers, and convenient access to exterior containers screened by enelosure(s). Vehicle and Service Access • Plan for unobstructed enclosure ingress and egress for service vehicles, preferably in -line with enclosure openings. Allow appropriate turning radii for service vehicles, and minimize potential 'blind spots' during entry and while backing. Screening Specification for Enclosures • Consider landscaping, setbacks and screening requirements, based on FWRC 19.125.040 (4) & (5). Help with many design parameters related to service access is available via the City's contracted solid waste services provider, Waste Management. Contact: Dian Young, Route Manager at 253-804-6815 (office) or 206-786-4530 (cell). COMNIUNITY DEVELOPMENT —BUILDING DIVISION Peter Lawrence, 253-835-2621, Peter.Lawrenceocityoffederalway.com 177te07a1i071L11 Building Code (IBC), 2015 Washington State Amendments WAC 51-50 International Mechal ical Code (iMC), 2015 Washington State Amendments WAC 51-52 Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC), 2015 Washington State Amendments WAC 51-56 & WAC 51-57 177te7-17c11i077al Fire Code (iFC), 2015 Washington State Amendments WAC 51 -54 I',-100199-00-PC Doc ID 75'91 Ms. Klein Febaiary 13. 2017 Paae 17 National Electric Code (NEC), 2014 Accessibility Code, ICC/ANSI A 117.1 - 2009 Washington State Amendments WAC 51-51 Washington State Energy Code, 2015 WAC 5 1 -11 Building Criteria Occupancy Classification: E Type of Construction: UNK Floor Area: UNK Number of Stories: UNK Fire Protection: UNK Wind/Seismic: Basic wind speed 85 Mph, Exposure, 25# Snow load, Seismic Zone D-1 A completed building permit application and commercial checklist is required at the time of submittal. (Additional copies of application and checklists may be obtained on our web site at www.cityoffederalway.com.) Submit _5_ sets of drawings and specifications. Specifications shall include: 2Soils report, _2_ Structural calculations, and _2_ Energy calculations, —2_ Ventilation calculations. Note: A Washington State Registered architects' stamp is required for additions/alterations (new or existing) of 4,000 gross floor areas or greater unless specifically listed as an "exempt" structure per the Revised Code of' Washington (RCW). Energy code compliance worksheets are required to be completed and included with your permit application. A wet stamp and signature is required on all sheets of plans and on the cover page of any calculations submitted. Federal Way reviews plans on a first in, first out basis, however, there are some small projects with inconsequential review requirements that may be reviewed out of order. Some project may require a third party review or inspection. The cost to cover these fees is the responsibility of the applicant. Any third party fee is in addition to regular permit fees and costs. Review Timing The first comment letter can be expected within 7-9 weeks of submittal date. Re -check of plans will occur in one to three weeks after re -submittal. 17-100199-00-PC Da: 11175'91 Ms. Klein February 13. 2017 Page 18 Revised or resubmitted plans shall be provided in the same format, size, and amount as the originally submitted plans. Revised/resubmitted drawings shall indicate by means of clouding or written response, what changes have been made from the original drawings. Plans for all involved departments will be forwarded from the Community Development Department. Other Permits & Inspections Separate permits may be required for electrical, mechanical, plumbing, fire suppression systems, and signs. Applicants may apply for separate permits at any time prior to commencement of construction. When required, special inspections shall be performed by WABO approved agencies or by agencies approved by the building official prior to permit issuance. Construction must be approved by all reviewing departments prior to final building division inspection. All concerned departments (Planning, Public Works, Electrical, & Fire) must sign off before the Building Department can final the structure for occupancy. Building final must be approved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Construction projects may be required to have a pre -construction conference. If a pre -con meeting is required, the general or representative, all subs, the architect or representative, the engineer or representative, electrical contractor, and any other interested party, should attend this meeting. Meetings will occur at the Building Department and will be scheduled by the inspector of record for the project. Site -Specific Requirements: • The land use process and the building application are not tied together for the purpose of the time limitations for expiration. • The land use requirements should be satisfied prior to submitting a building permit application. The information provided is based on limited plans and information. The comments provided are not intended to be a complete plan review and further comments are possible at time of building permit plan review. LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT Brian Asbuij,, 253-946-5407, BAsbury@lakehaven.o Water • A Certificate of Water Availability issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one (1) year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed; allow 1-2 work days to issue for typical. ■ Hydraulic model results (FF #101) indicate that Lakehaven's standard maximum allowable system liquid velocity of 10 ft/s is exceeded at a fire flow rate above 5,300 GPM. This flow figure depicts the calculated performance of the water distribution system under high demand conditions. Fire flow rates greater than available in the existing distribution system may be accommodated through water distribution system improvements. Please contact Lakehaven for further detail. • A Lakehaven Developer Extension (DE) Agreement will be required to construct new and water distribution system facilities for the proposed development. Additional detail and/or design requirements can be obtained from Lakehaven by completing & submitting a separate application to Lakehaven for either a Developer- Pre -Design Meeting or a DE Agreement. Lakehaven encourages 17-100199-00-11C Doc ID 79'Q] k1s. Klein Februan' 13.2017 Paste 19 owners/developers/applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes separately to Lakehaven, and sufficiently early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. ■ The site has two (2) existing residential water service connections: SvcNos 12695 & 12696, both 5/8"0/4" meters. ■ For water use during site construction/development, the existing water service(s) may be utilized or a hydrant meter may be rented from Lakehaven for this purpose. Please contact Lakehaven for further detail. ■ To satisfy premise isolation requirements, the installation & satisfactory testing of an approved backflow prevention assembly (BPA) adjacent to each domestic & irrigation service meter is required pursuant to WAC 246-290-490 & Lakehaven standards regarding premise isolation. As low health cross -connection hazards, either a double check valve assembly (DCVA) or a reduced pressure backflow assembly (RPBA) is required. For the fire -protection system for this proposal, a double check detector assembly (DCDA) or a reduced pressure detector assembly (RPDA) is required for 3" & larger fire protection service connections. Contact Lakehaven's Cross -Connection Control Program Manager (Chris Zoepfl, CZoepfl@Lakehaven.org, 253-946-5427) for additional information on premise isolation/BPA installation & testing coordination. ■ The associated DE Agreement must achieve a point of either Substantial Completion or Acceptance, as determined by Lakehaven, prior to activating any new domestic or irrigation water service connection(s). ■. Based on the proposal submitted, preliminary estimated Lakehaven water service connection fees/charges/deposits (2017 schedule) will be as follows. Actual connection charges will be determined upon submittal of service connection application(s) to Lakehaven. If a DE Agreement is required. CPILOE charges are due prior to & as a condition of scheduling the Lakehaven preconstruction meeting. Connection charges are separate fi-om any DE fees/charges/deposits & are due at the time of application for service. All Lakehaven fees, charges and deposits are typically reviewed & adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to change without notice. o Water Service/Meter installation, Domestic, 2" preliminary size estimate: $720.00 drop -in meter fee. Actual size TBD by Lakehaven based on applicant's estimated maximum GPM usage rate. o Water Service/Meter Installation, Irrigation, 1" preliminary size estimate: $310.00 drop -in meter fee, presumes converting one of the existing water service connections for this purpose. Actual size TBD by Lakehaven based on applicant's estimated maximum GPM usage rate. o Water Service/Meter installation, Fire -Protection, 5/8"x3/4" flow -detection -only meter: $260.00 drop -in meter fee. o Capital Facilities Charge(s)-Water, 12.00 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU) preliminary estimate: $34,760.00. Actual amount due TBD by Lakehaven based on applicant's estimated annual total water usage rate. Water system capacity credits are available for this property from system capacity charges previously assessed, paid directly to Lakehaven, and/or credited to the property for 2.00 ERU. Please contact Lakehaven for further detail. Sewer ■ A Certificate of Sewer Availability issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one (1) year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed, allow 1-2 work days to issue for typical. ■ The site does not have any previous or existing sewer service connections. • A separate Lakehaven Sewer Service Connection Permit is required for each new connection to the sanitary sewer system or any modification (re -alien, abandon, etc.) to an existing sewer service 17_ 1 rn, i o .on-i c Due ID i.'o i Ivls. Klein Februan- 13. 2017 Pace 20 connection, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current `Fees and Charges Resolution'. Minimum pipe slope for gravity sewer service connections is 2%. In addition to all other sewer service installation standards, installation of a Type 1, 48" monitoring manhole is typically required on the private building sewer line, for all new or modified non-residential connections. * Based on the proposal submitted, preliminary estimated Lakehaven sewer service connection fees/charges/deposits (2017 schedule) will be as follows. Actual connection charges will be determined upon submittal of service connection application(s) to Lakehaven. Connection charges are separate from any DE fees/charges/deposits & are due at the time of application for service. All Lakehaven fees, charges and deposits are typically reviewed & adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to change without notice. o Sewer Service Connection Permit Fee: $210.00. o Capital Facilities Charge(s)-Sewer, 10.00 ERU preliminary estimate: $33,250.00. Actual amount due TBD by Lakehaven based on applicant's estimated annual domestic only water usage rate. General ■ All Lakehaven Development Engineering related application forms, and associated standards information, can be accessed at Lakehaven's Development Engineering web pages (http://WwNv.lakeliaven.oro /204/Development-Engineering). • All comments herein are valid for one (1) year and are based on the proposal(s) submitted and Lakehaven's current regulations and policies. Any change to either the development proposal(s) or Lakehaven's regulations and policies may affect the above comments accordingly. SOUTH KING FIRE AND RESCUE Chris Cahan, 253-946-7243, chris.eahan@southkingfire.org The required fire flow for this project is up to 3000 gallons per minute depending on type of building construction. A Certificate of Water Availability shall be provided indicating* the fire flow available at the site. A hydraulic fire flow model shall be requested from the water district. Fire Hydrants: This project will require 3 fire hydrants. Fire hydrants shall be in service prior to and during the time of construction. Fire Access Roads: Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. EXCEPTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system the distance can be increase 20 percent. Fire apparatus access roads: 1) Shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. 2) Shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of a 75,000 pound fire apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. 17.1M199.40-PC Doc ID 75291 Ms. Klein February 13.2017 Pa- e 21 3) Shall be not less than a 32 foot inside turning radius and not less than a 40 foot outside turning radius. 4) With a dead-end in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with a cul-de-sac or Fire Department approved alternative at the dead end. All such cul-de-sacs shall be not less than 80 feet in diameter. 5) Gradient shall not exceed 12 percent. Designated fire lanes may be required for emergency access. This may be done during the plans check or prior to building final. Fire apparatus access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. Fire Sprinkler System: An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all occupancies where the total floor area included within the surrounding exterior walls on all floor levels, including basements, exceeds 5,000 square feet. Fire walls shall not be considered to separate a building to enable deletion of the required automatic fire - extinguishing system. The system demand pressure (to the source) required in a hydraulically designed automatic fire sprinkler system shall be at least 10 per cent less than the correlative water supply curve pressure. Fire Alarm: A Fire Alarm System is required. An automatic fire detection system shall be installed in all buildings exceeding 3,000 square feet gross floor area. This fire detection system shall be monitored by a central and/or remote station conforming to the current requirements of the National Fire Protection Association standards and/or the fire chief or designee. Fire Department Lock Box: A recessed fire department "Knox" brand key box shall be installed on the building Vehicle Access Gates: All vehicle access gates shall be provided with a "Knox' brand key cylinder for fire department access CLOSING This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication meeting and is intended to assist you in preparing plans and materials for formal application. We hope you found the comments useful to your project. We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the City's review of the formal application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter does not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per FWRC 19.40.070 (4). As you know, this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication materials submitted. 17-1001 99-00-PC Doc 11) 75291 NIS. Klein February 13. 2017 Pa`e 22 Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify information regarding development requirements outlined above. In addition to this preapplication letter, please examine the complete FWRC and other relevant codes carefully. Requirements that are found in the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project. If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative noted above. Any general questions can be directed towards me at 253-835-2641 or Becky.chapin@cityoffedera]way.com. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Becky Ch pin Associate Planner Me: Master Land Use Application Process I11/IV Submittal Requirements Variance Handout CPTED Checklist Parking Lot Design Criteria Environmental Checklist Mailing Envelopes Class IV -General Forest Practices Application King County's Mitigation Reserves Program Handouts Concurrency Application Lakehaven Map c: Calvin Gasawav, Greene Gasavvay Architects PLLC. calvin'u?grcenegasaway.com Sallv McLean. FWPS. smclean(u.fwps.oro ✓ Kevin Peterson. Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston. Senior Traffic Engineer Rob Van Orsow. Solid Waste/Recycling Coordinator Peter Lawrence. Plans Examiner Brian Asbury- Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan- South King Fire & Rescue 17-100199-00-IT Doc IU 7�791 41 k CITY DF Federal Way February 2, 2017 10:00 a.m. Pre -application Conference Sign in Sheet COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Project Name: FWPS New Elementary Shool City Hall ios Room Parcel's 042104-9100, 042104-9119, 042104-9123, 042104-9039, 042104-9086, 042104-9162, 042104-9062. File Number: 17-100199-00-PC NAME DEPARTMENT / DIVISION TELEPHONE NUMBER 2. AI -tars Jv� FU " SLe u : CA_S 217A 5. K44 d6e-u l S IE-t6. qL (, 72 �3 7. 3-21Y27 10. i53.q+t.41 7 11. FW f d .53, 'yb? 12. v 0� MA MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION 91VED DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �- 33325 8"' Avenue South CITY OF Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 JAN b 2 201. 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way www.citvoffederalway.cot'n =- _ DD l q q•-- 0 0— PCI Date i 2 l 1 APPLICATION NO(s) Project Name FWPS New Elementary School Property Address/Location 29016, 29026, 29020, 29206 and 29200 Military Road So plus vacant land Parcel Number(s) 042109100, 04210.79119, 0421049123, 0421049039, 0421049084, 0421049162 Project Description Construct a new elementary school, including building, parking and multi -purpose play fields. [aRWAN AU."LINI Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination —� Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process 11 (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) _ Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Connnercial/Residential Required Information BN and RM3.6 zoning Designation same Comprehensive Plan Designation mostlyyacaflue of Existing Improvements TBD Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Lisa Klein, AICP Address: AHBL, 2215 No 30th St, #300 City/State: Tacoma, WA 98403 Zip: Phone: (253) 383-2422 Fax: Email: lein�ah Isom Signature: L- Owner Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Bulletin #003 - -January 1, 2011 Page I of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application AtECECAD ..BAN CM OF FED.' January 12, 2017 City of Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Project: FWPS New Elementary Site Evaluation, AHBL No. 2160783.30 Subject: Pre -Application Meeting Request Dear Staff: SON al Federal Way Public Schools is evaluating property for use as a future elementary school site and requests a pre -application meeting to review preliminary findings and obtain comments from staff. The timing of the project is of importance to the District and we request the City schedule the meeting as soon as possible. The property is 6.7 acres located on the east side of Military Road South, south of the intersection with South 288th Street, and comprises six tax parcels: 0421049100, 0421049119, 0421049123, 0421049039, 0421049084, 0421049162 The project is to construct an approximately 50,000-square foot elementary school, together with typical improvements such as parking and multi -purpose sports fields. The property is partially zoned Neighborhood Business (BN) and RM 3.6, both of which allow schools following a Type III Process. We have reviewed City files for previous project approvals on the subject property and -have learned that there is a Category III wetland located on Parcel 0421049062 with what will likely be a 100-foot buffer. A copy of the wetland study completed for the prior project is enclosed. The City files also included a geotechnical study, which found the soils to be Class B and Class C, and generally conducive to development. At the meeting, we would like to obtain staff feedback on the proposal. Specifically, we have the following questions: We understand we will need to obtain a new wetland delineation for the property. It is highly likely that wetlands will need to be at least partially filled for an elementary school to be feasible on the property. Please explain the City process for approval of wetland fill and potential mitigation scenarios. For example, does the City have a wetland mitigation bank program? We understand we will need to obtain federal and state permits, so the question is related to City process and requirements. Civil Engineers Structural Engineers Landscape Architects Community Planners Land Surveyors Neighbors TACOMA 2. What is the likely timeframe for land use, site development, and building permit 2215 North 30th Street approvals? Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403-3350 253.383.2422 www.ahbi.com City of Federal Way January 12, 2017 2160783.30 Page 2 of 2 3. What type of frontage improvements on Military Road will be required? 4. Please describe the intersection spacing requirements that may impact location for access. Thank you for the opportunity to meet and review the property's potential. We look forward to meeting with you. Sincerely, Lisa Klein, AICP Associate Principal LK/Isk Enclosures c: Calvin Gasaway, Greene Gasaway Sean Comfort, AHBL Q:\2016\2160783\WORDPROC\Letters\20170110 Ur (PreApp Mtg) 2160783.30.docx FR HJ BI LJ FILE, CITY OF Federal Way January 17, 2017 Lisa Klein AHBL, Inc. 2215 North 30`' Street, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403 lklein@ahbl.com 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor RE: File #17-100199-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FWPS New Elementary School, 28852 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Ms. Klein: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your preapplication conference request. The application has been routed to members of the Development Review Committee and a meeting with the project applicant has been scheduled as follows: 10:00 a.m. —Thursday, February 2, 2017 Hylebos Conference Room Federal Way City Hall, 2nd Floor 33325 8d' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 We look forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend the meeting as this will be the only notice sent by the department. If you have any questions regarding the meeting, please contact me at becky.chapin@cityofFederalway.com, or 253-835-2641. Sincerely, Atv"< Becky C in Associate Planner Doc. I.D. 75258 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 13, 2017 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District South King Fire & Rescue Lindsey Sperry, Public Safety Officer FROM: Becky Chapin, Associate Planner FOR DRC MTG. ON: January 26, 2017 - Internal February 2, 2017,10:00am - with applicant FILE NUMBER(s): 17-100199-00-PC RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: FWPS New Elementary School PROJECT ADDRESS: 28852 Military Rd S. Parcel #'s 042104-9100, 042104-9119, 042104-9123, 042104-9039, 042104-9084, and 042104-9162 ZONING DISTRICT: BN & RM3600 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Proposal to construct new elementary school, including building, parking and multi -purpose play fields. Subject property contains critical areas. LAND USE PERMITS. PROJECT CONTACT. MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Preapplication Conference Lisa Klein, AICP AHBL 2215 N 30'' St, # 300 Tacoma, WA 98403 • Master Land Use Application • Project Narrative • Conceptual Site Plan FWF \'SITE ASSESSMENT ALONG MILITARY ROAD ( r ) r r I , r i I 1 I I I I 3 r a N8° 1 1 �6 Know. whars below. Call before you dig. / / I 1!r / f o Comma v TACOMA - SEATTLE • SPOKANE - TRILITIES ON"greens rSITE 3 e i OCamelol Squore • v Googre n VICINITY MAP OWNER: CIVIL ENGINEER: FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 33330 8th AVENUE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 CONTACT: TODD KANYER PH: (253) 945-2000 UTILITIES/SERVICES: AHBL, INC 2215 NORTH 30th STREET, SUITE 300 TACOMIL WASHINGTON 98403 CONTACT: WILI.1AM FIERST. RE PH:(253) 3&42422 FAX- (253)363-2572 SITE DATA- S WATER: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT SEWER: LAKEHAVEN UT I LITY DISTRICT SITE AREA: 667 ACRES POWER: PUGET SOUND ENERGY (PSE) ZONING: BN AND RM3.6 TELEPHONE: CENTURY LINK PARKING REQUIREMENTS: MIN. 1 SPACE PER EMPLOYEE SETBACKS: FRONT: 50 FEET PARCEL NUMBERS: SIDE: 50FEET REAR 50 FEET 0421049100 0421049039 0421049162 0421049119 0421049086 0421049062 D421049123 N (D GRAPHIC SCALE 0 30 60 120 1"= 60 FEET 29016, 29026. & 29206 MILITARY ROAD FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 2215 North 30th Street, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403 253.3832422 TEL 2M.3M 2572 FAX W ahbl.eam WEB Protect Tlfle: FWPS SITE ASSESSMENT ALONG MILITARY ROAD FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 333308TH AVENUE SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 TODD KANYER Job No. 216078340 Is,:, 3Q1 A ❑xc PRE -APPLICATION JANUARY 2017 NUCE AN Ll 9 n 7�j7 ` I_• :. CONCEPTUAL QITC OI Aw( Desloned bv: Drawn bv: Checked bv: Sheet No. C1.00 of Sheets DATE: January 12, 2017 FILENAME: Q:1201612160783110_CIVICADVI60783SHSFTE dw9 l�rw�i�•-F. S Site plan based on PRELIMINARY PLAN SCALE 1" = 50' ] 15to 39 PERCENT SLOPE AREA 1WHI 40 PERCENT OR GREATER SLOPE AREA 1 TE 111 R f IE,r liC11F1144 � IE 'COIM 5.44IAi1.0) Pe i r, 'AM A9].a5 lEe•PLAS. RLAIS 31 yl. lE 8• Pus 8 140J1 IE fi' Pus W.4i0.46 t 1 S S 1 45 RVA445Qi j f f rK• ..lR443� �{ 1 fE0'HASSM30i -{5 t o la o WtlTIC.CC _ �-1 ! 7 RµVF ¢4TA+ 1 ' 1r171E7'�c��C7tJ] J blffucr9ldCR'cl 7 WNW ll mm'13%10 , R>a>47-Vi: Atis 4]q)p m1 7• OFF ueeeR Wesra,sE seEse,xw'r� { ~r uo-+l 1 •+ 1 r lLpyA,ptE X•SiSPAy � 1 uaeERoei fTN it ` g�aq `_sw COMB OF 8 IC / 60Y'T.-TE Z 7 51L95' SITE Bd z RiWMESETM TWE cy� E, r or Cep ,J POPYERPIXE EJPVATTO443733 8 r —-�-� 4... •ram �,. .� L in . ter• f1., r l IF ' �.1. n•.NO• „1•""-- • 1 5 Td �C fPFO cwk •�{�_ '' J _.i>� all Bred by Contour Enaineerina dated 6/03/09 PRELIMINAR I P..1 •- 1 fQ `_ wriwr`rri+rwrrt• �_ _ _ -- .+���co-�ica• � CmAR11T SEiVRTN 347119W 1Y><� ARUE9fMt1T {p 5c4J17Ji N'41l1 WIF. R j GeoResources, LLC APPROXIMATE LOCATION 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 AND NUMBER OF TEST PIT TP-1 r Pife, Washington 98424 Ph:253-896-1011 Fax:253-896-2633 11' Site and Exploration Plan Proposed Steel Lake Plaza 29020 Military Road Federal Way, Washington, Washington ------------ DadD: StaelLakePlazaMilitaryRd.3P I June 2009 Fgure 2