12-104874CITY OF
�. Federal Way
January 30, 2013
Howard G Kimura
H G Kimura Architect PLLC
PO Box 59415
Renton, WA 98058
RE: File #12-104874-00-UP; PROCESS H SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Taco Time, 35500 Enchanted Pkwy S, Federal Way
Dear Mr. Kimura:
CITY HALL FILE,
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www. cityoffederalway.. com
The City of Federal Way's Community and Economic Development Department has completed
administrative review of the proposed Taco Time restaurant improvements located at 35500 Enchanted
Parkway South. The Process H land use application submitted on Oct 25, 2012, is hereby approved as the
proposal meets site plan and community design guideline criteria set forth in Federal Way Revised Code
(FWRC) 19.60.050 as found in the enclosed Exhibit - Findings for Process II Site Plan Approval and
incorporated into this decision. The remainder of this letter outlines the zoning and development review
process required for this proposal, conditions of approval, and a summary of appeal procedures.
REQUIRED REVIEW PROCESS
The proposed improvements to the site are subject to Process Il Site Plan Review pursuant to fast food
restaurant use review process requirements set forth in FWRC 19.240.110. The proposal does not exceed
the city adopted flexible thresholds set forth in FWRC 14.15.030(c) and therefore is exempt from review
under the State Environmental Policy Act.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Applicant shall indicate on the construction drawings an approved method of delineation for
pedestrian connections within the parking lot and the connection crossing the lot's ingress/egress to
the newly formed lot
2. Applicant shall return artwork on south elevation as shown in the initial submittal on the building
permit set. This condition and the added canopy will reduce the 252sf blank wall that is shown on the
Dec. 28-Sheet A3.2 elevation drawing. Blank walls in excess of 240sf and not screened by
landscaping are not permitted pursuant to FWRC 19.125.040(22).
3. Applicant shall submit the modular wall's manufacturing specifications that include color rendition
and/or photograph of the modular units for aesthetic compliance criteria set forth in FWRC
19.120.120(7). Final approval for the walls will be issued following building permit review.
APPEALS
The effective date of this decision is February 2, 2013. Pursuant to FWRC 19.60.080, any person who
received notice of this administrative decision may appeal the decision to the Federal Way Hearing
Examiner by February 16, 2013. A written appeal must be delivered to the Community and Economic
Development Department with the established fee. The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the
matter being appealed and a statement of the alleged errors in the decision. No work on the proposal may
Mr. Kimura
January 30, 2013
Page 2
begin until the end of the appeal period. However, as you are the only party of record, you may waive
your right to appeal this decision by submitting a written request to do so to the department (this action
allows the building permits to be issued prior to the end of the appeal period).
CLOSING
This land use decision does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and
standards relating to this development. This Process II approval does not constitute approval of a building
permit. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Matthew Herrera, Associate
Planner, at 253-835-2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com.
Sincerely,
Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for
Patrick Doherty, Director
enc: Approved Plans and Exhibit A `Findings for Process II Site Plan Review Approval'
c: w/ Findings
Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner
Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer
Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer
Scott Sproul, Plans Examiner
Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue
Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District
12-104874 Doc I D 62920
r M
CITY OF -"---�
Federal Way
EXHIBIT A
Findings for Process II Site Plan Approval
Taco Time
File #12-104874-00-UP
The Planning Division hereby presents the following analysis to the Director of Community and Economic
Development pursuant to content requirements of the Process II written decision as set forth in Federal Way
Revised Code (FWRC) 19.60.070. These findings are based on review of existing city documents and the
following items submitted by the applicant stamped by the Permit Center October 25, 2012 and December
28, 2012:
■ Architectural Sheets SD1.1, SD1.2, A3.1, A3.2 and color elevations prepared by Registered Architect
Howard Kimura
• Civil Sheets C-1.0 - C-4.0 prepared by Registered Professional Engineer Josef Valenta
• Landscape Sheets L1.1 and L1.2 prepared by Registered Landscape Architect Akemi Sakaida
• Photometric Lighting Plan prepared by Tiffany Gentry
1. Proposal — The project applicant proposes to construct a one-story, 2,681 square -foot fast food
restaurant with drive -through facility. The new structure will be located at 35500 Enchanted
Parkway South.
2. Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Designation — The subject property is within a Commercial
Enterprise (CE) designation. The applicant's proposed fast food restaurant use is permitted within
the CE zoning designation pursuant to FWRC 19.240.110.
3. Review Process — Fast-food restaurant uses located in the CE zone are subject to development
review procedures of Process II `Site Plan Review' set forth in FWRC Chapter 19.60. Process II
review requires no public notice period and concludes with a written decision issued by the Director
of Community and Economic Development. Appeals of the director's decision are conducted by the
city's Hearing Examiner.
4. Environmental Review — The application is exempt from review under the State Environmental
Policy Act as it does not exceed city adopted flexible thresholds set forth in FWRC 14.15.030.
Site Profile — The subject property is a former horticultural nursery with a single-family residence,
detached garage and several asphalt and concrete pads located in the southern portion of the city.
The site slopes in an easterly direction with the highest elevation at 292' and lowest elevation of
276' feet. The site is sparsely vegetated with mature fir and cedar trees with groundcovers. The
property abuts Enchanted Parkway South (principal arterial) and is within close proximity to
Interstate 5. The CE zoning district surrounds the property with various retail and bulk retail
establishments neighboring the subject property.
6. Height — The height of the tallest parapet is 26.5 feet above average building elevation. The height
of the structure is below the 40-foot outright height maximum.
7. Required Yards — Improvements associated with restaurant uses within CE zones must be set back
at least five feet from front, side, and rear property lines except for those improvements listed in
FWRC 19.125.160. As shown on the site plan sheet SD 1.1, no improvements are proposed within
the five-foot required yards.
8. Parking Lot — Pursuant to FWRC 19.240.110, fast-food restaurant uses shall provide 1 stall for each
80 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed building measures 2,681 square feet and therefore
34 parking stalls are required.' The applicant has provided 35 stalls, which exceeds the minimum
requirement.
Parked vehicles will be obscured from right-of-way by the elevated grade change and Type III
landscaping along the terraced walls. Type III landscaping along the side and rear property lines will
provide a visual screen along the access easement, side, and rear yards. The landscape plan shows
more than the 680 square feet of Type IV landscaping within the parking lot via bulb -outs and
islands. The provided amount exceeds the 20 square feet of landscaping per stall required by FWRC
19.125.070(2)(a)(i)(A).
9. Community Design Guidelines — As detailed below, the project embodies site and building design
principles consistent with requirements of the Community Design Guidelines (FWRC Chapter
19.115).
a. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)
i. Completed CPTED checklist.
ii. Entrance in full view of street.
iii. Direct pathways.
iv. Landscaping does not obstruct natural surveillance.
b. Surface Parking
i. Adequate internal lot landscaping.
ii. Wheel stops and curbing provided within stalls adjacent to pedestrian
pathways/connections.
iii. Loop access through parking lot minimizes vehicle turning movements.
iv. Shared driveway easement with adjacent lot reduces curb cuts.
Pedestrian Circulation and Public Space
i. Entrance fronts principal right-of-way — Enchanted Parkway South.
ii. Connection from adjacent public sidewalk to restaurant entrance and future development.
iii. Connection through parking lot delineated with refuge provided within landscape island.
■ Condition of Approval —Applicant shall indicate on the construction drawings an
approved method of delineation for pedestrian connections within the parking lot
and the connection crossing the lot's ingress/egress to the newly formed lot.
iv. Pedestrian plaza with outdoor eating area seating located along entrance fagade and
behind building.
v. Connections from patio seating area to public sidewalk.
vi. Three trash receptacles located in plaza and near outdoor eating areas.
' FWRC 19.130.040 states minimum number of parking stalls resulting in a fraction mall be rounded up to the next higher
number.
2 Approved methods of delineation include: stone, brick or granite pavers; exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete.
Findings for Process II Site Plan Approval Page 2
Taco Time File #12-104874-00-UP/n., i.n, 62913
d. Commercial Service
i. Garbage enclosure located in rear of building and angled for minimum truck turning
movements.
ii. Enclosure walls and gates are consistent in color, material, and architecture as building,
with additional landscape screening.
e. Building Fagade Modulation and Screening — All building facades that are both longer than 60
feet and are visible from either a right-of-way or residential use or zone shall incorporate " two
of four" fagade treatments. Options used must meet stated dimensional standards; except, if
more than two are used, dimensional requirements for each option will be determined on a
case -by -case basis. The north and south facades are subject to the two of four as the facades are
67 feet in length and visible from Enchanted Parkway South.
i. North Fagade:
• One modulation (2'depth, 26' width and 41' width)
• Pedestrian plaza >200sf
• Canopy <6' wide
• Meets standard outright
ii. South Fagade:
• One modulation (3'depth, 49' width and 17' width)
• Canopy < 6' wide
• Pedestrian plaza west elevation > 200sf
■ More than two options used. Departure from canopy dimensional requirement and
plaza location approved.
f. Building Articulation & Scale
i. Window openings with visible trim
ii. Extensive canopies
iii. Varied rooflines with parapets on north and east elevation
iv. Building incorporates wainscoting, color, and material variations
• Condition of Approval — Return of artwork on south elevation as shown in initial
submittal shall be included in the building permit plan set. This condition and the
added canopy will reduce the 252sf blank wall that is shown on the Dec. 28 Sheet
A3.2 elevation drawing. Blank walls in excess of 240sf and not screened by
landscaping are not allowed pursuant to FWRC 19.125.040(22).
g. District Guidelines — Applicable supplemental guidelines applying exclusively to the CE
zoning district have been satisfied as set forth below.
i. Parking is located on the side of the building. Pedestrian circulation is maximized
through the use of delineated pathways as conditioned by the land use decision.
ii. Entrance fagade fronts on right-of-way.
iii. No reflective glass is proposed.
iv. No chainlink fencing is proposed.
10. Commercial Service — Garbage and recycling enclosure is located on the eastern portion of the site
plan obscured from offsite view by grade change and landscaping. The enclosure will be constructed
Findings for Process II Site Plan Approval Page 3
Taco Time File #12-104874-00-UP/Doe I.D 62913
of CMU block wall painted to match building color and corrugated metal gate. The 288 square -foot
enclosure exceeds minimum size requirements set forth in FWRC 19.125.150.
11. Lighting — The photometric lighting plan indicates freestanding fixtures with an average footcandle
measurement of 3.48. Additionally, all pedestrian ways and parking areas exceed the 0.2 and 1.0
footcandle recommendations of the Illuminating Engineering Society for outdoor lighting levels.
Offsite glare from the lighting fixtures is not anticipated due to placement, shield requirements, and
perimeter landscaping.
12. Perimeter Landscaping — Pursuant to FWRC 19.125.060(9), development within the CE zoning
district is required to provide a landscaping screen five feet in width along all property lines.
The preliminary landscape plan shows Type III landscaping along the side and rear yards that
include: pines, maples, evergreen shrubs, and groundcover and existing mature evergreens that will
be retained. Along the Enchanted Parkway frontage a Type III landscape screen is integrated into the
terraced wall system.
13. Tree Retention/Replacement —Pursuant to FWRC 19.120.130, the minimum tree density for anew
use on a vacant lot within the CE zoning district is 20 tree units per acre. Through retention and/or
new planting, the subject property will be required to provide 21 tree units for 1.01 acres. The
applicant has proposed to retain existing trees worth 14 tree unit credits and provide 13 tree unit
credits in new planting for a total of 27 tree units, thereby exceeding the minimum required.
14. Clearing and Grading — Anticipated grading quantities include 4,332 cubic yards of cut and 1,029
cubic yards of fill. Cuts and fills will provide a level building pad for the new structure and aid in
stormwater collection. An extensive modular block retaining wall surrounds the parcel in order to
support new grade elevations. A terraced wall technique was utilized along the western portion in
order to avoid exceeding the six-foot outright height limitation. The grading plan indicates a six-foot
wall section adjacent to east property line. Final approval of the wall's aesthetic value shall be
administered with the building permit as conditioned below.
Condition of Approval — The applicant shall submit the modular wall's manufacturing specifications
that include color rendition and/or photograph of the modular units for aesthetic compliance
criteria setforth in FWRC 19.120.120(7). Final approval for the walls will be issued following
buildingpermit review.
A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan meeting the standards of the 2009 King
County Surface Water Design Manual will be reviewed with the final technical information report
with the building permit. Typical methods to mitigate erosion during construction include silt
fencing, rock pad construction entrance, inlet protection, and temporary sediment storage.
Compliance with erosion control standards will be enforced by city inspectors during site
development.
15. Transportation — The Public Works Traffic Division has determined the improvements will not
cause failures to the surrounding transportation system and a Capacity Reserve Certificate was
issued November 16, 2012. A transportation impact fee will be calculated based on the fee schedule
in effect at the time a completed building permit application is submitted. An independent fee
3 0.24 acres was deducted from the 1.25-acre parcel size to compensate for the access and utility easement as allowed by FWRC
19.120.130(3).
Findings for Process II Site Plan Approval Page 4
Taco Time File #12-104874-00-UP/no.. ID. 62913
calculation for the development has been approved by the city; however, if there are any changes in
the cost per trip end, the independent fee calculation will be adjusted accordingly.
Access to the subject property is via a 50' utility and access easement along the northern frontage.
The easement will also provide access to a new lot being created on the eastern portion of the subject
property under a separate Binding Site Plan (BSP) process. The applicant was granted a Conditional
Right -of -Way Modification on December 14, 2012, that allows full access onto Enchanted Parkway.
The queuing analysis provided by the applicant indicates 95% queues of 3 to 5 vehicles during the
PM peak hour. Traffic staff recommends verification of such queues with field observation at sites
used in the submitted independent fee calculation.
16. Public Improvements — The applicant is constructing street frontage improvements concurrently
with the site improvements. In order to meet the section standards for Enchanted Parkway South, the
applicant will be required to dedicate three feet of frontage to accommodate right-of-way
improvements. Those improvements include an eight -foot sidewalk, streetlights, planter strip with
street trees, curb, and gutter to be constructed concurrently with the private improvements.
Traffic Division staff will require a street lights plan that identifies junction boxes, conduit size and
run, service location, etc. This plan shall be included with the engineering component building
permit set.
17. Stormwater — The applicant is required to mitigate the effects of runoff caused by the proposed
improvements per the standards of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and City of
Federal Way Addendum. The flow control facility must meet the requirements for Conservation
Flow Control and water quality facilities must meet the requirements of the Enhanced Basic Water
Quality Area menu.
The preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) proposes to mitigate the effects of runoff by
directing flows from catch basins to four subsurface detention tanks measuring eight feet in diameter
with a total length of 395.5 feet. Water quality treatment will be provided downstream of the
detention facility via two StormFilter manholes prior to being released to the public system. A final
TIR and engineering will be reviewed as a component of the building permit submittal.
18. Fire Protection — A new fire hydrant will be installed on the northeastern portion of the newly
created Taco Time parcel per the requirements of the South King Fire and Rescue District.
19. Water & Sewer —The applicant will connect to an existing waterline on the adjacent northern
parcel. Lakehaven Utility District has indicated a Developer Extension Agreement will be required.
A sewer line will be installed adjacent -to the southern property line and capped near the newly
created eastern property line. A separate sewer service connection permit from Lakehaven Utility
District will be required.
20. Building Permit — No land clearing or construction may begin until building permit approval. As of
the date of this land use decision no building permit application has been submitted.
21. Decision Criteria— Staff finds the proposal is consistent with applicable site plan approval criteria
required for Process H as set forth in FWRC 19.60.050. The proposal is consistent with the city's
comprehensive plan; applicable provisions of FWRC Title 19 Zoning and Development Code; public
health, safety, and welfare; and streets and utilities in the area are adequate to serve the anticipated
Findings for Process II Site Plan Approval Page 5
Taco Time File #12-104874-00-UP/Doc LD. 62913
demand from the proposal. The proposal is consistent with Community Design Guidelines decisional
criteria set forth in FWRC Chapter 19.115.
Final construction drawings will be reviewed for compliance with specific regulations, conditions of
approval, and other applicable city requirements. These findings shall not waive compliance with
future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development.
Prepared by. Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner Date: January 30, 2013
Findings for Process II Site Plan Approval Page 6
Taco Time File #12-104874-00-UP/Do..1.n.62913
CITY OF
Federal
November 27, 2012
Howard G Kimura
H G Kimura Architect PLLC
PO Box 59415
Renton, WA 98058
CITY HALL
�� 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www.cityoffederalvvay.com
RE: FILE #12-104874-00-UP; TECHNICAL RESPONSE LETTER
Taco Time, 35500 Enchanted Pkwy S, Federal Way
Dear Mr. Kimura:
City staff has completed review of your Process II Master Land Use (MLU) application for the proposed
fast food restaurant development at the address referenced above. Site improvements submitted with the
October 25, 2012, MLU application include a new 2,681 square -foot building with drive -through, 35 stall
parking lot, stormwater facility, and landscaping. The applicant also proposes to subdivide the lot into
two lots via the Binding Site Plan (BSP) process. The application was deemed complete at intake.
TECHNICAL COMMENTS
Unless otherwise noted, the following comments provided by staff reviewing your project must be
addressed prior to land use and BSP approval. Please direct questions regarding any of the technical
comments to the appropriate staff representative.
Zoning and Land Use
Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com
1. Property Ownership — The MLU application has not been signed by the property owner. The city is
aware of the pending sale to the project proponent but cannot issue a land use decision without the
authorization of the current land owner. King County Assessor records accessed on the date of this
letter show the current property owner as Brian Kim. Mr. Kim's signature on the MLU application or
a purchase and sale agreement contingent on permitting the proposed development must be
submitted.
2. Access Easement —Please provide pedestrian access to the eastern lot via segregated pathway and
pavement delineation if the pathway is on the southern boundary of the easement.
3. Retaining Wall —The following comments pertain to separate aspects of the retaining wall system.
Please see FWRC 19.120.120 for the city's rockery and retaining wall requirements.
a. Detail— The grading plan details an extensive "modular block retaining wall" surrounding
the Taco Time site. Please show wall details/sections that illustrate the aesthetic nature of the
walls. Please note that walls are required to be composed of rock, brick, or other
textured/patterned wall style.
Mr_ Kimura
November 27, 2012
Page 2
b. Height —Please include top -of -wall (TW) and bottom -of -wall (BW) calculations at various
points along the wall. Retaining walls are limited to six feet in height measured from finished
grade at base to top of wall.
c. Terrace — Please increase the terrace width from three feet to five feet along the Enchanted
Parkway South frontage. FWRC 19.120.120(4) and (5) requires terraces be a minimum of
five horizontal feet and landscaped with Type III landscaping. When redesigning the terrace,
please keep the wall setback at least three feet from the right-of-way.
4. South Building Elevation — The southern building elevation is greater than 60 linear feet and visible
from the right-of-way, and therefore is subject to aesthetic treatment pursuant to FWRC 19.115.060.
A modulation and pedestrian plaza (provided on west elevation) has been provided. Typically,
modulation and screening treatments are to be implemented on the specific building elevation
requiring such treatment. Staff would allow the pedestrian plaza to be located on the west elevation if
the applicant would provide some articulation to the blank wall measuring approximately 221 square
feet on the south elevation. Staff recommends one or more of the following treatments to the blank
space:
a. Continue the awning along the entire facade;
b. Larger art displays;
c. Greenscreen/trellis; or
d. Glazing
5. Color Rendition — Please provide either color rendition of the elevation drawings with material list
or color and materials board with the resubmittal.
6. Rooftop Equipment — Heating, ventilation, air conditioning equipment, and other rooftop
appurtenances are not shown on the elevation plans. Be advised that such equipment requires a screen
that is integrated into the architecture of the building pursuant to FWRC 19.110.070(1). Providing
screening details with your land use permit ensures the appropriate level of design review now and
will avoid delay when reviewing the mechanical permit later in the building permit process.
7. Perimeter Landscaping —Approved landscaping plans are a component of the building permit set.
These comments are advisory now and corrections to the landscaping sheets are not necessary to
obtain Use Process II approval. Please implement these changes to comply with FWRC
19.125.060(9) - Type III landscaping five feet in width abutting all lot lines, on the building permit
plan set.
a. Eastern Perimeter — The five-foot Type III landscaping screen is required to abut the
property line. As shown, all shrub plantings are west of the retaining wall and outside the
five-foot buffer. Please provide additional shrub planting within the five-foot buffer (between
the wall and property line).
b. Southern Perimeter— Only one shrub is provided in the five-foot perimeter screen. Please
provide additional large shrubs to meet the Type III landscaping screen intent.
c. Western Perimeter — Landscaping is provided within the terrace and not abutting the property
line as required. The terrace requires its own Type III landscaping with perimeter landscaping
12-10487a
Doc. I.D. 62583
Mr_ Kimura
November 27, 2012
Page 3
a separate requirement. Please provide a Type III landscaping screen five feet in width
abutting the property line.
d. Northern Perimeter— Trees proposed in the perimeter screen area]] deciduous and no large
shrubs are shown. Please provide a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees interspersed
with large shrubs.
PIMA- �
i=
Graphic example of Type III landscaping from FWRC
Stormwater and Engineering
Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, kevin.peterson@cityof]'ederalway.com
Process II Application:
1. AlI plans showing frontage improvements shall be revised to reflect the City -modified requirements,
as outlined in the Traffic Division's November 16, 2012 review memo (item #5).
2. The civil engineer shall revise Section 1 — Project Overview in the TIR as follows:
a. Second paragraph, last sentence — Future development of the Eastern lot...
b. Third paragraph, second sentence — The West portion of the lot...
c. Third paragraph, third sentence — The East portion...
3. Revise Section 4 of the TIR as follows:
a. Developed Site Hydrology — There may be some revisions needed in calculating Off -Site
areas, based on the City eliminating the requirement to widen Enchanted Parkway.
4. Flow Control BMP's shall be provided per the requirements of Section 5.2 of the 2009 King County
Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), and shown on the plans, with BMP sizing calculations
provided in the T.I.R_
Binding Site Plan Application:
1. Add a north arrow to pages 2 and 3.
2. Dedication of right-of-way shall be via a Statutory Warranty Deed.
3. Revise the Account Number (Parcel #) on page I to 282I04-9106.
12-104874 Doc, 1.D. 62583
Mr. Kimura
November 27, 2012
Page 4
Transportation
Sarady Long, 253-835-2743, sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com
Site Plan Review Comments:
l . Left -turn out access onto SR 161 shall be restricted due to safety concerns with the northbound
queues from South 352"a Street and SR 161 intersection and proximity to 161h Avenue South. The
proposed driveway must be designed to prohibit left -turn out movement. The applicant's traffic
engineer may submit a written request with supporting safety analysis for access modification if
desired. Please note that modification requests have a nominal review fee.
2. Verify drive-thru queuing for the proposed restaurant to ensure that storage pocket is adequate to
accommodate the expected queues and will not create safety issue or impact the main driveway.
3. Streetlights on SR 161 should be depicted on the preliminary plans.
4. The proposed driveway should be widened to 40 feet to accommodate traffic from future pad/lot.
Half street improvement and right-of-way dedication along the property frontage on SR 161 is
required per City code. SR 161 (Enchanted Parkway S) is a Principal Arterial planned as a Type "C"
street, consisting of a 72' street including a 5' bike lane, curb and gutter, 6' planter strips with street
trees, 8' sidewalks, and street lights in a 106' right-of-way (ROW). These improvements have been
constructed but not to the current adopted standard. As such, the entire frontage would require 3'
right-of-way dedication and construction of a new (replaced) 8' concrete sidewalk and a 9' - 10'
planter strip with street trees between the new sidewalk and existing curb, and new street lights in
accordance with City standards.
FWRC 19.91.070 - Independent Traffic Impact Fee Calculation:
The applicant has submitted an independent fee calculation for the development in lieu of traffic impact
fee payment per the adopted fee schedule. Staff has reviewed the submitted trip generation study and
revision is not necessary. However, the applicant's traffic engineer should provide clarification on the
following comments:
1. The three survey sites should be approved by the City staff prior to conducting the survey. Of the
three survey sites, staff would recommend removing the Wallingford restaurant site from the list due
to surrounding uses not comparable to the proposed site.
2. The adjacent street traffic count conducted for the Auburn site should be conducted at the intersection
of 15`h Street SW & A Street NE. Most of the traffic entering and exiting the site would likely utilize
this intersection instead of 14'h Street NW & A Street NE.
3. Traffic data of the adjacent street traffic for the site in Wallingford was not collected in the same
manner as the Taco Time site in Auburn. Please clarify why the peak hour of adjacent traffic for the
intersection of North 45`h Street & Corliss Avenue North was not conducted for this site.
12-104874 Doc. I.D. 62583
Mr. Kimura
November 27, 2012
Page 5
Water/Sewer
Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District, 253-946-5407, basbury@lakehaven.org
As of November 8, the applicant has not yet submitted a Developer Extension Agreement.
APPLICATION STATUS
As of today, the 120-day review period has stopped with 32 days used. The review period will begin
again within 14 days of a complete resubmittal of items requested/corrected. When resubmitting
requested information, please provide a written response to each of the above -referenced items, two
copies of corrected reports, and six copies of corrected full size plans with the enclosed resubmittal form.
Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180
days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed void.
The Federal Way Revised Code can be reviewed in its entirety at
htip://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Federa]WM/
If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835-
2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com.
Sincerely,
M{atth Herrera
Associate Planner
enc: Redline Plans
Resubmittal Form
c: Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer
Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer
Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District
12-104874 Doc. LD. 62583
KEY NOTES
Q) 1 r TAX PARCEL 2821049008 O ENTER SIGN l WHEEL STOPS
I 1 1•I1) NVI OPMI i41 01 MARYI AND 10C O 22' POLE ON S CONCRETE BASE METAL HALIDE LIGHT FIXTURE 15 FIRE HYDRANT AND DOMESTIC/IRRIGATION WATER METERS
I 1 1 i I I O DRIVE THRU SIGN 16 'THANK YOU' / 'DO NOT ENTER' SIGN
I i
6' HT. SPLIT FACE CMU TRASH ENCLOSURE WIiH STEEL GATES 17 CATCH BASIN, TYP., REFER TO CIVIL
VAN ACCESS[&£ PARKWO STA c 18 STORM DETENTION VAULT, REFER TO CIVIL
381 SF PEDESTRIAN PLAZA N TH SXY CONC, TABLE; ONE GARBAGE 19 EXIST. HOUSE TO BE REMOVED
I I i i, O7 546 SF PEDESTRIAN PLAZA WITH (2) XXY CONC, TABLES; ONE GARBAGE 20 WATER QUALITY VAULT
1 y
l I l _® �8 BUILDING FOOTPRINT 21 HEIGHT DETECTOR BAR
t 1 22 DRIVE THRU 'ENTER' SIGN
} ,4 I I —vv ®%TS' •-- tirY •- _ a q,EAs�nL�s�TaR.
IRIC per_ ,0 KEYSTONE REIAIVG WALL SE�CINi - V _ _ --- .4V_- —
I
2' DIA STEEL Xn srAREO corn. PAno, a0' x s0` sQUAREs NEW STREET LIGHT PER CITY STD
IPF s 1
4 I ' I
I ' l } I IREW MENU SOARp 24 REMOVE EXIST. CURB/QUT rM, INSTALL NEW
_ 10' OIP EASEMENT ',bl u'^i Z �A� x 13 MU44JI SDEAKM ORDER BOARD DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY SIDS
/ I 486.27' N 88^ 37' 07" YY I 25 TO INMUL ANDREMOVE EX. RALIGN WITH INSTALL
OSTING ��/GJ
5 —1
l I •—��x--�x� Ln-
Ix.--» — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
i A h
Ij1
❑ 'o � y'1 5 T
} + Q +
1L
r
I < ! l+ 'a I !�
3 V I ;�. cV
I ESL 1Y 12 rn �L i I 1} �,, Ir FUTURE PAD
IL Q I ` U i r E3 1 f r/\ . 4 s s 6
L - ,S.
oeo-g
` ...�. -
1X I
81� 31 05 ;
y � o.
OB'-5110, �' TAX PARCEL 2821049';46
1 _
...��4\ J. E. V1K
ACCESS IJOI' PERN•II1 TCD
I I
°loco sDco socc
r x 1 2' DIA.STMIPOVER POLE
1
1 j1 l TAX PARCEL 2021049125
' LAKHA INVESTMENTS - — •--•--—�._.__
i IIl SITE PLAN
NRDR
0' _ 10_' 20' 30' do,
Building & Zoning Information:
1
'OspB new www
COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE (CE)
TYPE OF C0IPSONC110N: VB
OOLIIPANCY GROUP: A-2
WICK -SERVE RESTAURANT NTH DRIVE THRU WN00W
ALLOWABLE AREA: 6.000 SF (A-2, M8 CONST.)
ACTUAL SLOG AREA: 2,68, SF
TACO TIME LOT 1 54,5]I SF
LOT 2 SS,H4 SF
Y PROPFATY DEDICAOON .5 SF
OVERALL SITE AREA 110411 5 CA Z. ACHES. L1PRE' GA LL95
TACO VIE SITE: 55.3&T 67 Y
BLOB Si19ACPM FROYT: 5; SUE YARD: 5'; PEAR YARD: 5'
FLOOR AREA RAM 2,6111 SF / 55,39357- SF _ 48%
PARKING REGUNFPE 2,651 SF/ BO . N STALLS
PARKING PRWIOEIE 35 STALLS
BLOC / mum CO ANCY FLOOR AREA TOTAL AREA:
1 1ST 11OOR A2 2AIII SF 2,661 5
TOTAL CONOITIONEO AREA: 2.1181 SF
LIEFAWIANr Lalrc
DNNO B75 SF/ 15 58
KITCHEN I,012 SF/200 7
WNRNG B6 SF / 5 19
Of%CE�IOAET 2N .P/14D ]
TOTAL BUILDING OCCUPANT LOAD: 67
101E
AS SMALL BE POSTED ABOVE THE PRIMARY ENTRY CO. 1, IN —NG ME NAAMDN
OCCIIPART LOAD W THE ASSEMBLY AREA IS 64 PEOPLE. SON STIALL BE AN ARPROYm
I rlyuc PERMANENT DESIM MAINTNNED BY ME OMWER INSPECTOR TO VERIFY OESIFMP PAOR
xsrAL Tm
Assessor's Parcel Number
M104-9106 (OVERALL LOT PRIOR TO SHORT PLAT)
Minimum Plumbing Fixtures:
� AREA: 2.661 / 3O - EB
M14 VgW1L 45
TOTAL MEN: 45
Mur-
WATERQD " 2 (26-76 PEOPLE); 1 W. I TOILET PROVIDED
LAVATORIES I PER 2 WATER CLOSERS; I PROVIDED
EOWLE_
WATER COSE:1 - 2 (2a PEOPLE); 2 WO NOMDEO
IAVAlORE4 1 PER 2 WATER CLOSETS: 1 PROVIDED
Minimum Number & Width of Exit
TAIRA 111=% � CRP MAI; 94 A 20 - I&6'
ACNK SWAP PROPOSED: 7X IFW0 T MN/E E19F EULRi1
TA&E 101111 - 2 EATS MINIMUM PER 1-500 OCCUPANTS
1/ qODslA . 2 CXAP MVPA4R4. 2 Mn PRCWp O
Property Owner.
WAR K NO
awl RW U25 m
SLVERDALE, WA 90383
N CONNACT TO PURCHASE WM:
P-PHA GROUP
AW ILIME VALLEM IrxRAY
RENTOK WA NOSS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
BEG SW COR OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 TH N 90-36-00 E 181,58 FT TO ELY
MGN SEC S1AiE BWY 15-D TH NLY ALG SO ELY MEN 2S1 FT 10 TPCB
TH N 79-413-00 FT TH N 31-00-E TO N LN OF S 15 AC Or NW 1/4 OF
NW 1/4 111 W TO ELY MGN STALL HWAY 05-P TH SLY ON SD MW 10
TPOB
VICINITY MAP
r 1
?
iMa aL SIR
�
m am yrTA $ YIT }.
ICUCM r, x las
-
VICINITY MAP V
Ai�'a1ov11i.
r �pu1�I
�
RESUBMITTED
Ha;
12-19-m17
R�DIIa ro A - T
10 2
SUWi II}T PRDL'ISS ¢
RATEV ATE
I REVISIONS
Taco Time Restaurant
35500 Enchanted Parkway S.
Federal Way, WA 98003
OATEN 7-25-2012
H.G. Kimura
,Arwm�r,
20SD1.1
PLLc
r
TwnwLMr w,A. NTLai W YHA Serve
CITY OF
FeWeral Way
APPLICATION NO(5)
RECEIVE[
OCT 2 5 2012
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CDS
MASTER k" USE APPLICATION
DEPARTMENT OF F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-
33325 8t' Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
.v■a w A tvotl'ederal way.com
12-1049-7-4,-00 UP1I
Project Name r=L LI/ `Td Ti.rs�'
Date 1 o12s// 2—
Property Address/Location 3SSOd SO.
Parcel Number(i)
Project Description
PLEASE PRINT
2 f2/ o,L - 9/0 J&
ON.fTK v c� 7.i8 / .lrF / S rV R Y, lie 7;7-Co 77MF`
Rgs7stv,�. r— "'� d rc. � vim` 7ifiQ v w.wvow.
Type of Permit Required
Annexation
Binding Site Plan
Boundary Line Adjustment
- Comp Plan/Rezone
Land Surface Modification
Lot Line Elimination
_ Preapplication Conference
1 Process I (Director's Approval)
Process H (Site Plan Review)
Process III (Project Approval)
Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone)
Process VI
SEPA w/Projdct
SEPA Only
Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use
Short Subdivision
Subdivision
Variance: Commercial/Residential
Required Information
C. Y; Zoning Designation
E. Comprehensive Plan Designation
- - Value of Existing improveme-nis
Value of Proposed Improvements
International Building Code (IBC):
As Occupancy Type
L/6 __—Construction Type
Applicant
Name: Jo h th-ty. '7 q
Address: j3 0 0 /LJq o /C V4v y/r• ffiv�
City/State: /� e h cy [.t%�! 1 o X7
Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
Email: KriSfGh 22,2- a
Signature:
Agent (if different than Applicant)
%tri u/4h{ f�i�i v�1
Name:
Address: Ro 15 •ar 579 ` ,1_r-
City/State: �2 �.� a •�, L✓� `3 �o `�
Zip:
Phone: 4a - 2 7/_ / elf —
Fax: 4¢2 r= 2 7/- 2 3 1.3
Email: h ;� vra & Go.s-sG a S r: n e 7�
Signature: .�
-
Owner
Name: -4 LL-c— _
Address:
Ci 15tatc:
Zip:
Phone: vCo
Fax:
Email: I Ca- s f-c.� aa-a @ y,o �r..0 l e,c w\
Signature
Bulletin #003 -January 1, 2011 Page I of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application
1ST AM
0' -'ZV q12 3pjsl$�v
AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO:
Federal Way TT, LLC,
3300 Maply Valley Highway
Renton, WA 98058
2013012400741801
,1801
FIRST F:o00
E2586044
01124C/ 15:0T
KING C011NTY L3Aa2 935.00
SALE $1,150:030.00 PAGE —NI OF 001
Filed for Record at Request of:
First American Tide ]rtsurw&e Company National Commercial
Services
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
File No: NCS-560912-WAI (11) Date: December 13 " 2012
Grantor(s): Kim Properties Northwest, LLC
Grantee(s): Federal Way TT, LLC,
Abbreviated Legal: Ptn Sec 28 Twp 21N Rge 04E, NW W NW Qtr
Additional Legal on page:
Assessor's Tax Parcel No(s): 282104-9106-03
THE GRANTOR(S) Kim Properties Northwest, LLC, a Washington limited liability
company for and In consideration of Ten Dollars and other Good and Valuable
Consideration, in hand paid, conveys, and warrants to Federal Way TT, LLC, a Washington
limited liability company, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King,
State of Washington.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Real property in the County of Ming, State of Washington, described as
follows:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.;
THENCE NORTH 890 36' 00" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 181.58 FEET, TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY
OF SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5D;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID HIGHWAY NO.
511), 231 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE NORTH 790 49' 00" EAST, ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE, 443.40 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 31' 00" EAST TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTH 1S ACRES
OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER;
Page 1 of 2 LPB 10-05
s
APN: 282104-9106.03 Sta utory Warranty Deed Fde No.: NCS-560912-WA1(11)
-continued
THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID SOUTH IS ACRES TO THE
EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY NO. SD;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID BOUNDARY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Subject To: This conveyance is subject to covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, if
any, affecting title, whit may a pear in the public record, including those shown on any recorded
plat or surveyC bee [ 611v C'44 ""- 4%
Kim Properties Northwest, LLC, a
Washington limited liability company
Jonathan Kim, Managing Member
STATE OF Maryland )
)-ss
COUNTY OF Montgomery )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ]onathan Kim, is/are the person(s) who
appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that he/she/they signed this instrument, on
oath meted that he/she/they is/are authorized Ledin
te the instrument and acknowledged it as
the Managing Member of Kim Properties Nty LLC to be the free and voluntary act of
such party(les) for the uses and purposes m tihis instrumru ems, Notn Public
Bated: _ ��. 1 II +tilon[go�nata2 20unty •111 J
'`�•«5 7,
y- • •Ste r and :•p
Notary Public in and for the State of M�l��
Residing at; �Oc4[ (It7/
nt
My appointmeexpires: �' `; • + c' C1i'} `;i ,
Page 2 of 2 LPB 10-05
s �
._d W ,
Additionally, this Deed from Kim Properties Northwest, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, to
Federal Way TT, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, regarding tax parcel number 282104-9106-
03, shall be subject to the following matters and fence encroachments:
A record of survey recorded May 30, 1986 under recording no. 8605309011 said survey discloses
the following matters:
a. fence lying lying approximately 6 feet North of North boundary and connecting to fence on the
subject property
b. fence line lying approximately 4 feet West of East boundary line
c. fence encroaching from Southerly adjoiner
d. fence encroaching from Easterly adjoiner
e. fence approximately 3 feet inside Southerly boundary line crosses boundary line and extends
approximately 3 feet into Southerly adjoiner
f. Calculated bearing for Easterly boundary conflicts with record description approximately 1*45'
2. A record of survey recorded May 24, 2006 under recording no. 20060524900001 said survey
discloses the following matters:
a. wire fence encroaches from Easterly adjoiner up to 3.7 feet
b. chainlink fence lies up to 6.1 feet West of East boundary line
c. fence line encroaching up to 2.5 feet North of North boundary, crossing boundary and
extending up to 11.4 feet South of North boundary
d. fence not in alignment with West boundary line
e. fence lying up to 5.1 feet North of South boundary line
f. conflicting distances shown for all boundary lines
g. Bearing shown for Easterly boundary conflicts with record description approximately 1045'
3. A record of survey recorded March 15, 2007 under recording no. 20070315900004 said survey
discloses the following matters:
a. different bearing along common boundary fine
b. chainlink fence up to 6.3 feet West of East boundary line
c. wire fence encroaching from Easterly adjoiner
d. chainfink fence encroaching from Easterly adjoiner
e. wood fence encroaching from Southerly and Easterly adjoiners
4. Any facts, rights, interests or claims that may exist or arise by reason of the following matters
disclosed by an ALTA/ACSM survey made by David Evans and Associates Inc. on October 1,
2012, last revised January 04, 2013, designated Job Number HANA00000001.
(A) Adjoiner's fence In the southeast corner extends onto subject property; (B) Adjoiner's fence
along the east boundary line extends past boundary to the west; (C) Fence near the northeast
corner of subject property extends past boundary line to the north by up to 2.9..
1 ST AM
Arcs - S44 R /Z qft s1
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
TRACY E. DIGIOVANNI
SHIERS LAW FIRM LLP
600 Kitsap Street, Suite 202
Port Orchard, WA 98366
i11�1 111111111 41111 111111111111111
20130124001802
FIRST AMERICAN OT a1."
PACE-001 OF 009
01/2412W 15:09
KING COUNTY, WA
DEED OF TRUST
GRANTOR: FEDERAL WAY TT, LLC,a Washington limited liability company
GRANTEE: KIM PROPERTIES NORTHWEST, LLC, a Washington limited
liability company
Legal Description: BEG SW COR OF NW 'l OF NW `/4 TH N 89-36-00 E 181.58 FT
TO ELY MGN SEC STATE HWY # 5-D TH NLY ALG SD ELY MGN
231 FT TO TPOB TH N 79-49-00 E 443.40 FT TH N 00-31-00 E
TON LN OF S 15 AC OF NW 1/ OF NW '/4 TH W TO ELY MGN
STATE HWAY # 5-D TH SLY ON SD MGN TO TPOB
PARCEL #: 28-21-04-9106
THIS DEED OF TRUST ("Security Instrument") is made on January 18, 2013. The
Grantor is FEDERAL WAY TT, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, whose
address is 3300 Maple Valley Highway, Renton, WA 98058, Attn: Kristen Hanna,
Managing Member ("Borrower"). The Trustee is First American Title Insurance
Company ("Trustee") whose address is 818 Stewart Street, Suite 800, Seattle, WA
98101. The Beneficiary is KIM PROPERTIES NORTHWEST, LLC, a Washington
limited liability company, whose address is 17501 Charity Lane, Germantown, Maryland
20874, Attn: Jonathan Kim, Managing Member (Lender").
This Security Instrument secures to Lender: (a) any and all obligations of Borrower
under that certain Note of even date in the face amount of $750,000.00; (b) the payment
of all other sums, with interest, advanced under paragraph 6 to protect the security of
this Security Instrument; and (c) the performance of Borrower's covenants and
agreements under this Security Instrument. For this purpose, Borrower irrevocably
grants and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, the following described
property located in King County, Washington:
BEG SW COR OF NW % OF NW % TH N 89-36-00 E 181.58 FT TO ELY MGN
SEC STATE HWY # 5-D TH NLY ALG SD ELY MGN 231 FT TO TPOB TH N 79-
4E-00 E 443.40 FT TH N 00-31-00 E TO N LN OF S 15 AC OF NW % OF NW'/4
TH W TO ELY MGN STATE HWAY # 5-D TH SLY ON SD MGN TO TPOB
Said property is located at 35500 Enchanted Parkway South, Federal Way, County of
King, State of Washington.
TOGETHER WITH all the improvements now or hereafter erected on the property, and
all easements, appurtenances, and fixtures now or hereafter a part of the property. All
replacements and additions shall also be covered by this Security Instrument. All of the
foregoing is referred to in this Security Instrument as the "Property.
BORROWER COVENANTS that Borrower is lawfully seised of the estate hereby
conveyed and has the right to grant and convey the Property and that the Property is
unencumbered, except for encumbrances of record and as reflected in the First
American Title Company Lender's Policy of Title Insurance (Policy Number 560912)
insuring the Property title. Borrower warrants and will defend the title to the Property
against all claims and demands, subject to any encumbrances of record.
THIS SECURITY INSTRUMENT combines uniform covenants for national use and non-
uniform covenants with limited variations by jurisdiction to constitute a uniform security
instrument covering real property.
UNIFORM COVENANTS. Borrower and Lender covenant and agree as follows:
1. Payment of Principal and Interest; Prepayment and Late Charges. Borrower
shall promptly pay when due the principal of and interest on the debt evidenced by the
Note and any prepayment and late charges due under the Note.
2. Funds for Taxes and Insurance. Subject to applicable law, Borrower shall pay
in a timely manner_ (a) yearly taxes and assessments which may attain priority over this
Security Instrument as a lien on the Property; (b) yearly leasehold payments or ground
rents on the Property, if any; (c) yearly hazard or property insurance premiums; and (d)
yearly flood insurance premiums, if any. These items are called "Escrow Items".
Borrower shall promptly pay the Escrow Items on time directly to the person or entity
owed payment, unless Lender determines in its sole discretion to collect funds from
Borrower sufficient to pay the Escrow Items on an annual basis.
3. Charges; Liens. Borrower shall pay all taxes, assessments, charges, fines and
impositions attributable to the Property which may attain priority over this Security
InstrumentA#er C nsiftg.g MNhase of the PMpqdy, and leasehold payments or
ground rents, if any. Borrower shall pay these obligations in the manner provided in
paragraph 2. Borrower shall promptly furnish to Lender all notices of amounts to be
paid under this paragraph and paragraph 2. if Borrower makes these payments
directly, Borrower shall promptly furnish to Lender receipts evidencing the payments.
Borrower shall promptly discharge any lien which has priority over this Security
Instrument unless Borrower: (a) agrees in writing to the payment of the obligation
secured by the lien in a manner acceptable to Lender; (b) contests in good faith the lien
by, or defends against enforcement of the lien in, legal proceedings which, in the
Lender's opinion, operates to prevent the enforcement of the lien; or (c) secures from
the holder of the lien an agreement satisfactory to Lender subordinating the lien to this
Security Instrument. if Lender determines that any part of the Property is subject to a
lien which may attain priority over this Security Instrument, Lender may give Borrower a
notice identifying the lien. Borrower shall satisfy the lien or take one or more of the
actions set forth above within 10 days of the giving of notice.
4. Hazard or Property Insurance. Borrower shall keep the improvements now
existing or hereafter erected on the Property insured against loss by fire, hazards
included within the term "extended coverage" and any other hazards, including floods or
flooding, for which Lender requires insurance. This insurance shall be maintained in the
amounts and for the periods that Lender requires. The insurance carrier providing the
insurance shall be chosen by Borrower subject to Lender's approval which shall not be
unreasonably withheld. If Borrower fails to maintain coverage described above, Lender
may, at Lender's option, obtain coverage to protect Lender's rights in the Property in
accordance with paragraph 6.
All insurance policies and renewals shall be acceptable to Lender and shall include a
standard mortgage clause. Each liability insurance policy will name Lender as an
additional assured. All required policies will provide for at least thirty (30) days' written
notice to Lender prior to the effective date of any cancellation or material amendment,
which term shall include any reduction in the scope or limits of coverage. Borrower
shall furnish to Lender (x) the complete original of each required insurance policy, or (y)
a copy thereof (including all declaration pages, policy forms and endorsements), or (z)
an uncertified memorandum copy thereof (including all declaration pages, policy forms
and endorsements), together with an original evidence of insurance or certificate of
insurance setting forth the coverage, the limits of liability, the carrier, the policy number
and the expiration date. As security for the Secured Obligations, Borrower hereby
assigns to Lender all required insurance policies, together with all monies and proceeds
thereof, rights thereto and all unearned premiums returnable upon cancellation.
If Lender requires, Borrower shall promptly give to Lender all receipts of paid premiums
and renewal notices. In the event of loss, Borrower shall give prompt notice to the
insurance carrier and Lender. Lender may make proof of loss if not made promptly by
Borrower.
Unless Lender and Borrower otherwise agree in writing, insurance proceeds shall be
applied to restoration or repair of the Property damaged, if the restoration or repair is
economically feasible and Lender's security is not lessened. If the restoration or repair
is not economically feasible or Lender's security would be lessened, the insurance
proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Security Instrument, whether or
not then due, with any excess paid to Borrower. If Borrower abandons the Property, or
does not answer within 30 days a notice from Lender that the insurance carrier has
offered to settle a claim, then Lender may collect the insurance proceeds. Lender may
use the proceeds to repair or restore the Property or to pay sums secured by this
Security Instrument, whether or not then due. The 30-day period will begin when the
notice is given.
Unless Lender and Borrower otherwise agree in writing, any application of proceeds to
principal shall not extend or postpone the due date of the payments referred to in
paragraphs 1 and 2 or change the amount of the payments. If under paragraph 17 the
Property is acquired by Lender, Borrower's right to any insurance policies and proceeds
resulting from damage to the Property prior to the acquisition shall pass to Lender to the
extent of the sums secured by this Security Instrument immediately prior to the
acquisition.
5. Occupancy, Preservation, Maintenance and Protection of the Property;
Borrower's Loan. Borrower shall not destroy, damage or impair the Property, allow the
Property to deteriorate, or commit waste on the Property. Borrower shall be in default if
any forfeiture action or proceeding, whether civil or criminal, is begun that in Lender's
good faith judgment could result in forfeiture of the Property or otherwise materially
impair the lien created by this Security Instrument or Lender's security interest.
Borrower may cure such a default and reinstate, as provided in paragraph 15, by
causing the action or proceeding to be dismissed with a ruling that, in Lender's good
faith determination, precludes forfeiture of the Borrower's interest in the Property or
other material impairment of the lien created by this Security Instrument or Lender's
security interest. Borrower shall also be in default if Borrower, gave materially false or
inaccurate information or statements to Lender (or failed to provide Lender with any
material information) in connection with the Note secured by this Security Instrument.
6. Protection of Lender`s Rights in the Property. If Borrower fails to perform the
covenants and agreements contained in this Security Instrument, or there is a legal
proceeding that may significantly affect Lender's rights in the Property (such as a
proceeding in bankruptcy, probate, for condemnation or forfeiture or to enforce laws or
regulations), then Lender may do and pay for whatever is necessary to protect the value
of the Property and Lender's rights in the Property. Lender's actions may include
paying any sums secured by a lien which has priority over this Security Instrument,
appearing in court, paying reasonable attorneys' fees and entering on the Property to
make repairs. Although Lender may take action under this paragraph 6, Lender does
not have to do so_
Any amounts disbursed by Lender under this paragraph 6 shall become additional debt
of Borrower secured by this Security Instrument. Unless Borrower and Lender agree to
other terms of payment, these amounts shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum
from the date of disbursement and shall be payable, with interest, upon notice from
Lender to Borrower requesting payment.
7. Inspection. Lender or its agent may make reasonable entries upon and
inspections of the Property. Lender shall give Borrower notice at the time of or prior to
an inspection specifying reasonable cause for the inspection.
8. Condemnation. The proceeds of any award or claim for diirect damages in
connection with any condemnation or other taking of any part of the Property, or for
conveyance in lieu of condemnation, are hereby assigned and shall be paid to Lender.
In the event of a total taking of the Property, the proceeds shall be applied to the sums
secured by this Security Instrument, whether or not then due, with any excess paid to
Borrower. In the event of a partial taking of the Property in which the fair market value
of the Property immediately before the taking is equal to or greater than the amount of
the sums secured by this Security Instrument immediately before the taking, unless
Borrower and Lender otherwise agree in writing, the sums secured by this Security
Instrument shall be reduced by the amount of the proceeds multiplied by the following
fraction: (a) the total amount of the sums secured immediately before the taking,
divided by (b) the fair market value of the Property immediately before the taking. Any
balance shall be paid to Borrower. In the event of a partial taking of the Property in
which the fair market value of the Property immediately before the taking is less than
the amount of the sums secured immediately before the taking, unless Borrower and
Lender otherwise agree in writing or unless applicable law otherwise provides, the
proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Security Instrument whether or
not the sums are then due.
If the Property is abandoned by Borrower, or if, after notice by Lender to Borrower that
the condemnor offers to make an award or settle a claim for damages, Borrower fails to
respond to Lender within 30 days after the date the notice is given, Lender is authorized
to collect and apply the proceeds, at its option, either to restoration or repair of the
Property or to the sums secured by this Security Instrument, whether or not then due.
Unless Lender and Borrower otherwise agree in writing, any application of proceeds to
principal shall not extend or postpone the due date of the payments referred to in
paragraphs 1 and 2 or change the amount of such payments.
9. Borrower Not Released; Forbearance By Lender Not a Waiver. Extension of
the time for payment or modification of amortization of the sums secured by this
Security Instrument granted by Lender to any successor in interest of Borrower shall not
operate to release the liability of the original Borrower or Borrower's successors in
interest. Lender shall not be required to commence proceedings against any successor
in interest or to extend time for payment or otherwise modify amortization of the sums
secured by this Security Instrument by reason of any demand made by the original
Borrower or Borrower's successors in interest. Any forbearance by Lender in exercising
any right or remedy shall not be a waiver of or preclude the exercise of any right or
remedy.
10. Successors and Assigns Bound; Joint and Several Liability; Co -Signers.
The covenants and agreements of this Security Instrument shall bind and benefit the
successors and assigns of Lender and Borrower, subject to the provisions of paragraph
14. Borrower's Covenants and agreements shall be joint and several. Any Borrower
who co-signs this Security Instrument but does not execute the note: (a) is co-signing
this Security Instrument only to mortgage, grant and convey that Borrower's interest in
the Property under the terms of this Security Instrument; (b) is not personally obligated
to pay the sums secured by this Security Instrument; and (c) agrees that Lender and
any other Borrower may agree to extend, modify, forebear or make any
accommodations with regard to the terms of this Security Instrument or the Note without
that Borrower's consent.
11. Loan Charges. If the loan secured by this Security instrument is subject to a law
which sets maximum loan charges, and that law is finally interpreted so that the interest
or other loan charges collected or to be collected in connection with the loan exceed the
permitted limits, then: (a) any such loan charge shall be reduced by the amount
necessary to reduce the charge to the permitted limit; and (b) any sums already
collected from Borrower which exceeded permitted limits will be refunded to Borrower.
Lender may choose to make this refund by reducing the principal owed under the Note
or by making a direct payment to Borrower. If a refund reduces principal, the reduction
will be treated as a partial prepayment without any prepayment charge under the Note.
12. Notices. Any notice to Borrower provided for in this Security Instrument shall be
given by delivering it or by mailing it by registered or certified mail unless applicable law
requires use of another method. The notice shall be directed to the Borrower's address
stated herein or any other address Borrower designates by notice to Lender, Any notice
to Lender shall be given by registered or certified mail to Lender's address stated herein
or any other address Lender designates by notice to Borrower. Any notice provided for
in this Security Instrument shall be deemed to have been given to Borrower or Lender
when given as provided in this paragraph.
13. Governing Laws Severabillity. This Security Instrument shall be governed by
federal law and the laws of the State of Washington. In the event that any provision or
clause of this Security Instrument or the Note conflicts with applicable law, such conflict
shall not affect other provisions of this Security Instrument or the Note which can be
given effect without the conflicting provision. To this end the provisions of this Security
Instrument and the Note are declared to be severable.
14. Sale of the Property or a Beneficial Interest in Borrower. If all or any part of
the Property or any interest in it is sold, transferred or assigned, or if a beneficial interest
in Borrower is sold, transferred, assigned, or conveyed to a person or entity that is not a
relative of Jon Hanna, or is not an affiliated or related entity to Jon Hanna or his family
or Federal Way TT, LLC, without Lender's prior written consent, Lender may, at its
option, require immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Security
Instrument. However, this option shall not be exercised by Lender if exercise is
prohibited by federal law as of the date of this Security lnstrument.tf Lender exercises
this option, Lender shall give Borrower notice of acceleration. The notice shall provide a
period of not less than 34 days from the date the notice is delivered or mailed within
which Borrower must pay all sums secured by this Security Instrument. If Borrower fails
to pay these sums prior to the expiration of this period, Lender may invoke any
remedies permitted by this Security instrument without further notice or demand on
Borrower.
IS. Borrower's Right to Reinstate. If Borrower meets certain conditions, Borrower
shall have the right to have enforcement of this Security Instrument discontinued at any
time prior to the earlier of: (a) 11 days (or such other period as applicable law may
specify for reinstatement) before sale of the Property pursuant to any power of sale
contained in this Security Instrument; or (b) entry of a judgment enforcing this Security
Instrument. Those conditions are that Borrower: (a) pays Lender all sums which then
would be due under this Security Instrument and the Note as if no acceleration had
occurred; (b) cures any default of any other covenants or agreements; (c) pays all
expenses incurred in enforcing this Security Instrument, including, but not limited to,
reasonable attomeys' fees; and (d) takes such action as Lender may reasonably require
to assure that the lien of this Security Instrument, Lender's rights in the Property and
Borrower's obligation to pay the sums secured by this Security Instrument shall continue
unchanged. Upon reinstatement by Borrower, this Security Instrument and the
obligations secured hereby shall remain fully effective as if no acceleration had
occurred. However, this right to reinstate shall not apply in the case of acceleration
under paragraph 14.
16. Hazardous Substances. Borrower shall not cause or permit the presence, use,
disposal, storage, or release of any Hazardous Substances on or in the Property.
Borrower shall not do, nor allow anyone else to do, anything affecting the Property that
is in violation of any Environmental Law. The preceding two sentences shall not apply
to the presence, use, or storage on the Property of small quantities of Hazardous
Substances that are generally recognized to be appropriate to normal residential Q1
gornmercial uses-LI-s-a_restaurantland to maintenance of the Property.
Borrower shall promptly give Lender written notice of any investigation, claim, demand,
lawsuit or other action by any governmental or regulatory agency or private party
involving the Property and any Hazardous Substance or Environmental Law of which
Borrower has actual knowledge. If Borrower learns, or is notified by any governmental
or regulatory authority, that any removal or other refnediation of any Hazardous
Substance affecting the Property is necessary, Borrower shall promptly take all
necessary remedial actions in accordance with Environmental Law.
As used in this paragraph 16, "Hazardous Substancee are those substances defined as
toxic or hazardous substances by Environmental Law and the following substances:
gasoline, kerosene, other flammable or toxic petroleum products, toxic pesticides and
herbicides, volatile solvents, materials containing asbestos or formaldehyde, and
radioactive materials. As used in this paragraph 16, "Environmental Law" means
federal laws and laws of the jurisdiction where the Property is located that relate to
health, safety or environmental protection.
NON -UNIFORM COVENANTS_ Borrower and Lender further covenant and agree as
follows:
17. Acceleration; Remedies. Lender shall give notice to Borrower prior to
acceleration following Borrower's breach of any covenant or agreement in this
Security Instrument (but not prior to acceleration under paragraph 14 unless
applicable law provides otherwise). The notice shall specify: (a) the default; (b)
the action required to cure the default; (c) a date, not less than 30 days from the
date the notice is given to Borrower, by which the default must be cured; and (d)
that failure to cure the default on or before the date specified in the notice may
result in acceleration of the sums secured by this Security Instrument and sale of
the Property at public auction at a date not less than 120 days in the future. The
notice shall further inform Borrower of the right to reinstate after acceleration, the
right to bring a court action to assert the non-existence of a default or any other
defense of Borrower to acceleration and sale, and any other matters required to
be included in the notice by applicable law. If the default is not cured on or
before the date specified in the notice, Lender, at its option, may require
immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument without
further demand and may invoke the power of sale and any other remedies
permitted by applicable law. Lender shall be entitled to collect all expenses
incurred in pursuing the remedies provided in this paragraph 17, including, but
not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of tide evidence.
If Lender invokes the power of sale, Lender shall give written notice to Trustee of
the occurrence of an event of default and of Lender's election to cause the
Property to be sold. Trustee and Lender shall take such action regarding notice
of sale and shall give such notices to Borrower and to other persons as
applicable law may require. After the time required by applicable law and after
publication of the notice of sale, Trustee, without demand on Borrower, shall sell
the Property at public auction to the highest bidder at the time and place under
the terms designated in the notice of sale in one or more parcels and in any order
Trustee determines. Trustee may postpone sale of the Property for a period or
periods permitted by applicable law in accordance with applicable law. Lender or
its designee may purchase the Property at any sale.
Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser Trustee`s deed conveying the Property
without any covenant or warranty, expressed or implied. The recitals in the
Trustee's deed shall be prima facie evidence of the truth of the statements made
therein. Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale in the following order: (a) to
all expenses of the sale, including, but not limited to, reasonable Trustee's and
attorneys' fees; (b) to all sums secured by this Security Instrument; and (c) any
excess to the person or persons legally entitled to it or to the clerk of the superior
court of the county in which the sale took place.
18. Reconveyance. Upon payment of all sums secured by this Security Instrument,
Lender shall request Trustee to reconvey the Property and shall surrender this Security
Instrument and all notes evidencing debt secured by this Security Instrument to Trustee.
Trustee shall reconvey the Property without warranty and without charge to the person
or persons legally entitled to it. Such person or persons shall pay any recordation costs.
19. Substitute Trustee. In accordance with applicable law, Lender may from time to
time appoint a successor trustee to any Trustee appointed hereunder. Without
conveyance of the Property, the successor trustee shall succeed to all the title, power
and duties conferred upon Trustee herein and by applicable law.
20. Use of Property. The Property is not used principally for agricultural or farming
purposes.
BY SIGNING BELOW, Borrower accepts and agrees to the terms and covenants
contained in this Security Instrument.
BORROW : FEDERAL Ulf Y TT, LLC
y=
Krist n H nna, Managing Member
Date: z 2013
STATE OF WASHINGTON
)ss.
COUNTY OF KING
On this / 0' day of January, 2013, personally appeared before me KRISTEN
HANNA, known to me to be the Managing Member of Federal Way TT, LLC, a
Washington Limited Liability Company, who executed the within and foregoing
instrument and acknowledged the same instrument to be free and voluntary act and
deed of said Limited Liability Company, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,
and on oath stated that she was authorized to execute said instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official
seal, the day and year first above written.
Notary public
slap of Waehinpton
ABIOML 9 FISHBACK
MY Appointment Expire: Nov 21. 2016
NOTAR UBLIC in and for the State of Washington
residingcW.
My Commission expires: A) hV - 2_ l 2 6 (-Le
3560482.5
UmH.G. KIMURA
ARCH ITECT, PLLC
Howard G. Kimura, Principal
January 4, 2013
Mr. Matt Herrera, Associate Planner
Community Development Services Department
City of Federal Way
33325 8"' Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
RE: File # 12-104874-00-UP; Technical Response Letter
Response to Process II Comments
Proposed Taco Time Restaurant
35500 Enchanted Parkway S.
Federal Way, WA 98003
Dear Matt:
We responded to your initial letter and submitted a package to the City on December 19t'. We had accidentally
omitted the L 1.1 and L 1.2 landscape planting plan and detail sheets that have revisions per your original letter.
Please insert these sheets into the previous sets for review.
Thank you.
Once again Matt, we appreciate you working with us on this project.
Sincerely,
HG Kimura Architect, PLLC
Howard G. Kimura, AIA
Principal
Enclosures: (6) Copies of the revised U.1 and L1.2 drawings
(1) Green Resubmittal Information Form
RE-SUBM P7eD
JAN 0 4 2013
CITY OF CAS R,4L WRY
18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE a Renton, WA 98058 ■ 425.766.5000 ■ Fax: 425.271.2383 ■ email: hgkimura@comcast.net
l�ES U B M ITTTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33325 81h Avenue South
:. Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
CITY OF JAN 0 4 2013 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
Federal
' ; a www.citvoffederalwa .corn
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CDS
RESU BM ITTAL INFORMATION
This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals.
"Please note: Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted
unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that
do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to
submit all items in person and to contact the Permit Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure
about the number of copies required. **
ANYCHANGES TO DRAWINGS MUST BE CLOUDED.
Project Number:
Project Name:
49-7 00 — Ulo
7' - %l iyI
Project Address:
Project Contact:
-Hy" —op(
/4Cttiavem Phone:
412.r- ZI 2L71- 117S_
RESUBMITTED ITEMS:
# of Copies **
L1.
Detailed Description of Item
** Always submit the same number of copies as required foryour initial application."
Resubmittal Requested by: _Pe-�c Letter Dated
to ern er
i
OFFICE USE ONL Y
RESUB A _ Distribution Date: / J By.-
Dept/Div
Name
#
Description
,,Buildin
'Plannin
PW
Fire
Other
Bulletin #129—January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL
DATE: January 4, 2013
TO: Kevin Peterson, Development Services
Sarady Long, Traffic
Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official
Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District
Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue
FROM: Matt Herrera - Planning
COMMENTS: Please get me your comments by Friday January 18
FILE NUMBER(s):
........................................................................................................................
12-104874-00-UP
RELATED FILE NOS.:
None
PROJECT NAME:
TACO TIME
PROJECTADDRESS:
35500 ENCHANTED PKWY S
ZONING DISTRICT:
CE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Proposal to construct a new 2,381 square foot restaurant with drive through.
LAND USE PERMITS:
Process II
PROJECT CONTACT.
H G KIMURA ARCHITECT PLLC
HOWARD GKIMURA
PO BOX 59415
MATERIALS SUBMITTED:
1.
Response Letter
2.
TIR
3.
Traffic Report
4.
Plan Sheets
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33325 81h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
CITY OF 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
Federal Miley www.ritvoffedcralway.com
RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION
This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals.
"Pleasenote.- Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted
unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that
do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to
submit all items in person and to contact the Permit Counter prior to submitting ifyou are not sure
about the number of copies required. **
ANY CHANGES TO DRAWINGS MUST BE CLOUDED.
Project Number: "2. - / d z1 f i � - c� o -y /®
Project Name:. �et-z,.-o
Project Address: 3 �� ,le,�e. _ _
Project Contact: /,%1-73— 71/o!:ezE y2f Phone: 2 r3 -- 4031- 3 ,?
RESUBMITTED ITEMS:
# of Copies "*
Detailed Description of Item
-VAI G/L/ f3%�•aj
s D
8 2012
WAY
,LM of; FEDERAL
CDS
** Always submit the same number of copies as required foryour initial application.**
Resubmittal Requested by: Al ,e�ZgLetter Dated: 1 J --2-71 12,
tz5tatr memneri
OFFICE USE ONL Y n
RESUB #.• Distribution DateBy.-
Dept/Div
Name
#
Description
Building
Plannin
,/,',
PW
_
Fire
Other
Bulletin #129 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\I-Iandouts\Resubmittal Information
WrH.G.MMURA
ARCHITECT. P,A,
December 19, 2012
Mr. Matt Herrera, Assoc. Planner
Community Development Services Department
City of Federal Way
33325 0 Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
RE: File # 12-104874-00-UP; Technical Response Letter
Response to Process II Comments
Proposed Taco Time Restaurant
35500 Enchanted Parkway S.
Federal Way, WA 98003
Dear Matt:
RESUBMITTED
DEC 2 8 2012
CITY OF FEDEPAE WAY
CDS
Floward G. Kimura, Principal
We are in receipt of your Process II Technical Response Letter dated November 27, 2012 and will respond in the
same order as your letter.
/o M`V 1. Master Land Use Application has been signed by the owner, see attached.
/� 2. A concrete sidewalk has been added to the south side of the vehicular access easement and extends east to
the east property line of lot 1.
Answered by Josef Valenta, PE (Civil Engineer, Abossein Engineering)
3 a. - Notes on Grading Plan have been revised to describe retaining walls as Split Face Keystone
Retaining Walls. Sheet C1.1 Grading Sections and Profile has been added to the set to show typical
retaining wall sections.
3 b. - Spot elevations have been added to sheet C1.0 Grading Plan to show top and bottom of
retaining walls at regular intervals and any grade changes. Sheet C1.I Grading Sections and Profile
has been added to the set to show typical retaining wall sections and that the height is less than
maximum 6'.
3 c. - The terrace width is 5' as required by the code. The toe of two tier retaining wall along
Enchanted Parkway is 5' from the new property line. See also Detail 1 - Typical ROW Retaining Wall
Section on sheet C1.1.
4. South building elevation has been revised to show a continuous awning across the elevation.
5. Color rendition of the front and side of the building will provide the general feel for the elevation
colors. Colors have been labeled as well. Samples of the metallic green awning, cement plaster
and photos of another recently constructed Taco Time has been submitted with this package as
well for your review.
6. The building is 20'-6" high to the main parapet and the "towers along the west and north sides are
26'-6" high. The ceiling height is 10' with a l'-6" plenum, 2'-8" deep full -span truss and 4"
thick rigid insulation on top establishes the top of roof at 14'-6" at the low point and
approximately 15'-6" at the high point. Since the parapet is 20'-6" tall, we should have 5' to
screen the rooftop mechanical equipment.
18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE ■ Renton, WA 98058 ■ 425.766.5000 ■ Fax: 425.271.2383 n email: hgkimura@comcast.net
Process II Responses
December 19, 2012
Page 2
Answered by Akemi Sakaida, (Landscape Architect, Terra Forma Design Group, Inc.):
7. a). Some trees are shown above the retaining wall, but the majority of planting (trees
and shrubs) are below the retaining wall to help screen the wall and provide the drive
thru and parking area with a nicer visual appearance.
7b. The hatch pattern (zig zag) represents a mixture of native plant material. It is
wider than the required 5' along the south western portion where the wall is more
visible.
7c. landscaping along the bottom of the wall has been added to help soften the
appearance of the wall. The terrace between is planted, as well as the top of the
uppermost wall at the drive ffim area.
7d. have added evergreen trees, so there is a now a mixture of tree types. Deciduous
trees were added below the wall since it will help tie in with the other side of the
driveway and provide more interest rather than putting them on top of the wall in the
5' along the property line.
Stormwater and Engineering: (Answers by Josef Valenta, PE, Abossein Engin.)
1. Frontage Improvements have been revised per Transportation comment #5 and these
revisions are shown on all sheets and Sheet C4.0 Enchanted Parkway Improvements.
2. TIR Section 1 text has been revised per comments.
3. TIR Section 4 and all calculations have been modified to reflect frontage improvement
changes. Plans have been revised to match new calculations.
4. TIR Section 4, Performance Standards (Part C), Flow Control System has been
appended to describe all requirements of the 2009 KC SWDM Section 1.2.3.3 and
Section 5.2. Paragraphs 1 through 3 describe compliance or why this project cannot
comply with these requirements. A letter from the geotechnical engineer has been added
at the end of this section.
Binding Site Plan Application: (Answers by Sean Douthett, PLS, David Evans & Assoc)
1. Added north arrow on pages 2 and 3
2. A separate exhibit and description for the right-of-way dedication have been prepared and
submitted.
3. Revised the Account Number on page 1.
Transportation — Site Plan Review Comments:
1. Refer to attached "Enchanted Parkway Taco Time, Responses to City Comments"
Booklet answered by Mark Jacobs, PE, Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc.
He answers questions 1-4 for Site Plan Review and 1-3 Independent Traffic Impact Fee Calculation
18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE ■ Renton, WA 98058 ■ 425.766.5000 ■ Fax 425.271.2383 ■ email: hgkimura@comcast.net
Process II Responses
December 19, 2012
Page 3
Water / Sewer (Answered by Josef Valenta, PE, Abossein Engineering)
Sheet C3.0 Utility Plan have been discussed and submitted to Brian Asbury. A Developer Extension
Agreement will be submitted to Lakehaven Utility District with next submittal.
This concludes our response to your comments. If there are any questions related to the above responses,
please email or call me and I will have the appropriate professional provide you with an answer.
Once again Matt, we appreciate you working with us and we hope the attached responses satisfy each of
the reviewers.
Sincerely,
HG Kimura Architect, PLLC
Ho,wardt- Kimura, AIA
Principal
Enclosures: (2) Copies of "Eno hanled Way Taco Time Response to City Comments" reports
(2) TIR Revised Reports
(6) Copies of the revised drawings
(1) Green Resubmittal Information Form
18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE ai Renton, WA 98058 ■ 425.766.5000 ■ Fax: 425.271.2383 r email: hgkimura@comcast.net
CITY
Way
DATE: November 161h, 2012
TO: Matt Herrera
FROM: Sarady Long_
SUBJECT: TACO TIME - (12-104874-00-UP)
35500 ENCHANTED PKWY S
MEMORANDUM
Public Works Department
Public Works Traffic Division has reviewed the submittal material and has the following comments
on the above project:
Site Plan Review Comments:
Left -turn out access onto SR 161 shall be restricted due to safety concerns with the
northbound queues from S 352"d Street and SR 161 intersection and proximity to 16th Ave
South. The proposed driveway must be designed to prohibit left -turn out movement. The
applicant's traffic engineer may submit a written request with supporting safety analysis for
access modification if desired. Please note that this modification requests have a nominal
review fee.
2. Verify drive-thru queuing for the proposed restaurant to ensure that storage pocket is
adequate to accommodate the expected queues and will not create safety issue or impact
the main driveway.
3. Streetlights on SR 161 should be depicted on the preliminary plans.
4. The proposed driveway should be widened to 40 feet to accommodate traffic from future
pad/lot.
5. Half street improvement and right-of-way dedication along the property frontage on SR 161
is required per City code. SR 161 (Enchanted Parkway S) is a Principal Arterial planned as a
Type "C" street, consisting of a 72' street included a 5' bike lane, curb and gutter, 6' planter
strips with street trees, 8' sidewalks, and street lights in a 106' right-of-way (ROW). These
improvements have been constructed but not to the current adopted standard. As such,
the entire frontage would require 3' right-of-way dedication and construction of a new
(replaced) 8' concrete sidewalk, 9' - 10' planter strip with street trees between the new
sidewalk and existing curb, and new street lights in accordance with City standards.
FWRC 19.91.070 - Independent Traffic Impact Fee Calculation
The applicant has submitted an independent fee calculation for the development in lieu of traffic
impact fee payment per the adopted fee schedule. Staff has reviewed the submitted trip
generation study and revision is not necessary. However, the applicant's traffic engineer should
provide clarification on the following comments:
1. The three survey sites should be approved by the City staff prior to conducting the survey.
Of the three survey site, staff would recommend removing the Wallingford restaurant site
from the list due to surrounding uses not comparable to the proposed site.
2. The adjacent street traffic count conducted for the Auburn site should be conducted at the
intersection of 15th St. SW & A Street NE. Most of the traffic entering and exiting the site
would likely utilize this intersection instead of 14th St. NW & A street NE.
3. Traffic data of the adjacent street traffic for the site in Wallingford was not collected in the
same manner as the Taco Time site in Auburn. Please clarify why the peak hour of adjacent
traffic for the intersection of N 45th St. & Corliss Ave N was not conducted for this site.
H.G. KIMU RA
ARCHITECT, PLLC
Howard G. Kimura, Principal
October 10, 2012
Site Address:
Proposed Taco Time Restaurant
35500 Enchanted Parkway South
Federal Way, WA 98003
Community Design Guidelines — Written Narrative:
a. Building Fagade Modulation and Sreening options:
Both the north and south sides of the building are greater than 60' long. This project will
utilize Fagade Modulations and Pedestrian plaza options. Each 60' side has been modulated
a minimum of 2' to break up the blank wall fagade. We have added a pedestrian plaza along
the north and west sides of the building, both much greater than 200 square feet. Since the
south side has little room, we have moved this pedestrian plaza to the west side and more
than doubled the size to compensate.
b. Drive Through:
The drive thru lane has been positioned on -site to allow the stacking lane to queue cars in
such a manner that they do no interfere with the street traffic or on -site parking lot traffic. As
a result, we had to wrap the drive thru land around the building between the street front and
the building. We will be providing a type 3 landscape screen along the frontage to conceal
the car line and lights. It is also elevated above the street level by approximately 8-9' so car
lights may not be visible in any case.
Stacking lane is physically separated from the parking lot to mitigate congestion
Drive through speakers will be set to a volume to conform to the Washington Administrative
Code 173-63-040, Maximum permissible environmental noise levels base upon
Environmental Designation for Noise Abatement (EDNA) for the source and receiving
properties.
Although a bypass or escape lane is recommended and a great idea, it took up too much
property to accommodate this and would create slope and retaining walls along both the north
and south sides of the site.
C. Entrance Facade:
Both the north and the west entry will have an entry tower with accent stone pilasters that will
call attention to the "entry." From Enchanted Parkway, passerby traffic will beaN�j�
the building frontage perched on top of an 8-9' pedestal. Transparent glass has beenaXtttti ED
the elevations to allow transparency to the dining room areas.
d. Fenestration:
Fenestration will not have any ground level mirrored or reflective glass. Pro�jt vQfl �§9, RAL WAY
transparent glazing. DS
18012 West Lake Desire Drive Southeast • Renton, Washington 98058 ■ Tel: 425.766.5000 ■ Fax: 425.271.2383 ■ email: hgkimura@comcast.net
Community Design Guidelines
October 10, 2012
Page 2
e. Articulation:
The building will have a 36" high stone wainscot with concrete cap, cement plaster in the
body of the building and a metal trim entablature to provide a top to the building. The entries
will have stone pilasters to outline the tower that provides vertical modulation to emphasize
"entry" to our customers. In addition, over the windows at 10' above finished floor, we will
have a standing seam metal roof canopy to provide further horizontal modulations.
The north and south sides of the building are greater than 60' long and will have at least one
2' minimum offset in the wall to give horizontal modulation in addition to the above listed
amenities. At the entry towers, the overhangs will be constructed out of steel channels to
provide a deeper 4' overhang and emphasize entry by introducing a different overhang type.
f. Pedestrian Circulation:
All sidewalks and pedestrian plazas will be delineated by a scored concrete surface with 36"
squares. The path from Enchanted Parkway to the building entrance will not be able to
accommodate the ramp as shown in a previous site plan scheme. With the 3' property take,
6' landscape planter, 8' sidewalk, it leaves very little room for a ramp system to
accommodate an 8-9' grade differential. The maximum slope for a ramp would be 1:12 with
a landing being required every 30" maximum height. With a 30' run, 5' wide ramp, it
requires 4 switchbacks and on the fourth switchback it runs into the sidewalk. This also
creates quite a monolithic structure and I am not certain it would be used due to the
cumbersome ramp system. This path could potentially traverse the entire frontage with a
landing every 30', 30" in height, but would traverse 72-84' long the entire length and would
reduce the amount of landscaping and still have the look of a huge monolithic structure,
taking away from our "entry " form and emphasis.
All parking stalls adjacent to the pedestrian walkways will have wheel stops.
g. Pedestrian Areas:
The site has included two pedestrian plazas, one large area to the west that connects the
dining room to the plaza area and will be screened by 36" high landscaping along the drive
thru lane. Also along with NE corner, there is a second pedestrian plaza. Both will have
36" square concrete tables, garbage cans for customers to sit and eat. Both locations should
have excellent solar exposure and provide a choice to dine in private or in a more public
space.
h. Crime Prevention thru Environmental Design:
The Crime Prevention through Environmental Design checklist has been filled out and
completed and items have been incorporated into the site plan where applicable.
i. Appurtenances
Outdoor seating tables constructed out of concrete materials have been incorporated into the
pedestrian plaza areas. 3 Garbage cans were added; 1 per 8 stalls, rounded to 30 per
preapplication meeting notes. Light poles were added to provide night time illumination in
strategic areas and a freestanding pole sign was added toward the site entry.
18012 West Lake Desire Drive Southeast ■ Renton, Washington 98058 ■ Tel: 425.766.5000 ■ Fax: 425.271.2383 ■ email: hgkimura@comcast.net
Community Design Guidelines
October 10, 2012
Page 2
j. Lighting:
Light fixtures are 22' high on top of a 3' concrete base and will have the shoe -box head with
a sharp cut-off lense. Refer to lighting plan attached to this proposal. General illumination
shown for entire parking lot, drive -though lane, trash area and pedestrian plazas.
k. Fencing:
Fencing not used on this project.
End of Community Design Guidelines
18012 West Lake Desire Drive Southeast ■ Renton, Washingion 98058 ■ Tel: 425.766.5000 ■ Fax: 425.271.2383 ■ email: hgldmura@comcast.net
CITY OFJ I A.--" Ya
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33325 8`h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
wwwxityuffedcrai way.com
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) Checklist Instructions
This checklist is designed to assist the project proponent in demonstrating how CPTED principles have
been met. This goal can also be met by submitting a written explanation as to how each of the three design
principles of Natural Surveillance, Access Control, and Ownership has been met.
The checklist has been prepared to provide guidance and assistance in regard to the integration of CPTED
principles into proposed project designs. The purpose of the checklist is to assist a project proponent in
identifying and incorporating design strategies that implement the CPTED principles identified in Federal
Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.115.010.
CPTED principles, performance standards, and strategies are used during project development review to
identify and incorporate design features, which reduce opportunities for criminal activity to occur. The
effectiveness of CPTED is based on the fact that criminals make rational choices about their targets. In
general:
(1) The greater the risk of being seen, challenged, or caught; the less likely they are to commit
a crime.
(2) The greater the effort required, the less likely they are to commit a crime.
(3) The lesser the actual or perceived rewards, the less likely they are to commit a crime.
Through use of CPTED principles, the built environment can be designed and managed to ensure:
(1) There is more chance of being seen, challenged, or caught;
(2) Greater effort is required;
(3) The actual or perceived rewards are less; and
(4) Opportunities for criminal activity are minimized.
CPTED Design Principles
CPTED design principles are functionally grouped into three categories:
(1) Natural Surveillance. This category focuses on strategies to design the built environment in
a manner that promotes visibility of public spaces and areas.
(2) Access Control. This category focuses on the techniques that prevent and/or deter RECEIVED
unauthorized and/or inappropriate access.
(3) Ownership. This category focuses on strategies to reduce the perception of areas as OCT 2U12
"ownerless" and therefore available for undesirable uses.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bulletin ##021 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 2 k:\Handout \CPTED
__N
How to Use This Checklist
This checklist has been prepared to assist in identifying appropriate strategies to incorporate CPTED
design principles into proposed projects in Federal Way. The guidelines included in this checklist expand
on the principles found in FWRC 19.115.010.
It is recommended that the principles be reviewed initially to identify the approaches used to implement
OPTED. Subsequent to this initial review, this checklist should be reviewed to identify additional
strategies that may be applicable for a proposed project. Not all strategies are applicable to all projects. In
addition, the CPTED principles may be addressed through strategies that are not listed.
Checklist Design
The checklist has been organized in the following manner:
Functional Area
Specy7e design element
Section and
,j
Functional Area
Evaluation
addressed byCPTEDprMc4Wes
Performance
Performance Standard
for Agency
Performance Standard
Standard
Use Orly
What'is the desired outcome of
Strategy
applying CPTED principles to
rhls funerianal area
X Awllwke siw r a Review
o* W=Lbk dU&C BuFld'utb Permit Rzview
Strategy
Technique which can be used
5ccit I.fl: tNainral Surveillance
to implement CPTED principles
Check Box
I.I 6liad Comers
Conforms
Indicate by checking this box if
Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots
Rcvise
this strategy has been used in the
;NA
proposed project
Comments.
Strategy Writain
Pathways should be direct. All barriers along
This section can be used to write
pathways should be permeable (sac through)
in asrrategy which is not
includinglandscaping, fencin etc. ■
specifically listed but is
Consider die installation of mirrors to allow users to.
employed in the project
see ahead of them and around corners o
Process Applicability
❑ o'her ra[c
Indicates when in the review
4
process fire rdrntrftcd guidelitte
should be assessed
Site Plan and Building Permit Review
Certain guidelines and techniques are best applied during different points in the review process. To assist
in facilitating CPTED review, guidelines which are best considered during site plan review are indicated
with a " ■ " symbol. Guidelines that are most appropriately applied during building permit review are
indicated with a "e" symbol. .
Bulletin #021 —January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 2 kAHandout \CPTED Instructions
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33325 8`h Avenue South
CITY OF Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835- w.ci; Fax 253-835-2609
+. ` r� �V1i'Vv.C4t otfederalwa .cam
Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design (CPTED) Checklist
Directions
Please fill out the checklist to indicate which strategies have been used to implement CPTED principles in
your proposed project. Please check all strategies that are applicable to your project for each of the
numbered guidelines. You may check more than one strategy for each guideline.
Your responses will be evaluated by City Staff, and will be integrated into the Site Plan and/or Building
Permit review process.
Section and
Performance
Standard
Functional Area Evaluation for
Performance Standard Agency Use Only
.Strategy
■ Applicable during Site Plan Review
A Applicable during Building Penr& Review
Section 1.0 Natural Surveillance
1.1 Blind Corners f _Conforms
Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. Revise
_NA
Comments:
ID/Pathways should be direct. All barriers along pathways should
be permeable (see through) including landscaping, fencing etc.
■
Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead
of them and around comers. e W' - V ..
Other strategy used: ��1 wn (x„
1.2 Site and Building Layout _Conforms
Allow natural observation from the street to the use, from the —Revise
ttse to the street, and between uses _NA
kol vm rii ( tJl� ( ap k55' b 1-e- Comments:
d7_A
Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page I of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist
Section and I +," 1. Functional Area
Performance Performance Standard
Standard
Strategy
■ Applicable during. Sire Plan Review
$ Applicable during $uildinv Permit R& ri~
c1 Orient the main entrance towards the street or both streets on
For Non -Single co em ■
Family
Development
Position habitable rooms with windows at the front of the
dwelling..M
Access to dwellings or other uses above commercial/ retail
development should not be from the rear of the building. ■
Offset windows, doorways and balconies to allow for natural
observation while protecting privacy. R
voe Locate main entrances/exits at the front of the site and in view
of the Street. 0
For Commercial/
Retail/ Industrial �f employee entrances roust be separated from the main
and Community entrance, they should maximize opportunities for natural
Facilities surveillance from the street. ■
In industrial developments, administration/offices should be
located at the front of the building. ■
Avoid large expanses of parking. Where large expanses. of
For Surface ❑ parldng are proposed, provide surveillance such as security
Parldng and cameras.
Parking
Structures Access to elevators, stairwells and pedestrian pathways should
be clearly visible from an adjacent parking area. ■
L9'—/ Avoid hidden recesses. 0
�y Locate parking areas in locations that can be observed by
3" adjoining uses. ■
Open spaces shall be clearly designated and situated at
For Common/ locations that are easily observed by people. Parks, plazas,
Open Space common areas, and playgrounds should be placed in the front
Areas of buildings'. Shopping centers and other similar uses should
face streets. ■ +
Other strategy used:
n
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 9 k:\HandoutslCPTED Checklist
Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for
Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only
Standard
Strategy
■ Applicable during Site Pldn Review
e Applicable during Build ing_Permit Review
1.3 Common/Open Space Areas and Public On -Site Open Conforms
Space _Revise
Provide natural surveillance for common/open space areas. _NA
Comments:
Position active uses or habitable rooms with windows adjacent
to main common/open space areas, e.g. playgrounds,
swimming pools, etc., and public on -site open space. ■
Design and locate dumpster enclosures in a manner which
screens refuse containers but avoids providing opportunities to
hide. M
Locate waiting areas and external entries to elevators/stairwells
❑ close to areas of active uses to make them visible from the
building entry. e
Locate seating in areas of active uses. e
Other strategy used:
1.4 Entrances
Provide entries that are clearly visible.
Design entrances to allow users to see into them before
entering. ■
Conforms
_Revise
AL _NA
Ih/ Comments:
Entrances should be clearly identified (Signs must conform to
FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. (Applicable during
Certificate of Occumnev Ins ection .
Other strategy used: A fI p hw Y
❑PA
1.5 Fencing I _Conforms
Fence design should maximize natural surveillance from the -Revise Revise
street to the building and from the building to the street, 'and —NA
minimize opportunities for intruders to hide. Comments.
PO news to QIAU a i a
Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist
Section and Functional Area
Performance Performance Standard
Standard
Strategy
■ Applicable during Site Plan Review
e Applicable during Building Permit Review
❑ Front fences should be predominantly open in design, e.g.
pickets or wrought iron, or low in height. e
Design high solid front fences in a manner that incorporates
` ❑ oepen elements to allow visibility above the height of five feet.
If noise insulation is required, install double -glazing at the
❑ front of the building rather than solid fences higher than five
feet. e
Other strategy used:
1.6 Landscaping
Avoid landscaping which obstructs natural surveillance and
allows intruders to hide_
Trees with dense low growth foliage should be spaced or their
Ulk crown should be raised to avoid a continuous barrier. 0
Use low groundcover, shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in
53 height, or high -canopied trees (clean trimmed to a height of
eight feet) around children's play areas, parking areas, and
along pedestrian pathways. ■
Avoid vegetation that conceals the building entrance from the
street. ■
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Conforms
Revise
µ—NA
Comments:
Other strategy used:
1.7 Exterior Lighting Conforms
Provide exterior lighting that enhances natural surveillance. _Revise
(Refer to FWRC 19.115.050(7)(a) for specific lighting NA
requirements.) Comments:
Prepare a lighting plan in accordance with Illuminating
Engineering Society of America (IESA) Standards, which
addresses project lighting in a comprehensive manner. Select a
lighting approach that is consistent with local conditions and
crime problems. a
Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 4 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist
Section and d Functional Area Evaluation for
Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only
Standard
Strategy
■ Applicable disring Site Pion Review
A Applicable during Building Permit Revidw
Locate elevated light fixtures (poles, light standards, etc.) in a
coordinated manner that provides the desired coverage. The
useful ground coverage of an elevated light fixture is roughly
twice its height. a
For areas intended to be used at night, ensure that Iighting
Rf supports visibility. Where lighting is placed at a lower height to
support visibility for pedestrians, ensure that it is vandal -
resistant. e
Ensure inset or modulated spaces on a building facade,
access/egress routes, and signage is well lit. e
®/ In areas used by pedestrians, ensure that lighting shines on
pedestrian pathways and possible entrapment spaces. e
u/PIace lighting to take into account vegetation, in its current and
armature form, as well as any other element that may have the
potential for blocking light. e
Avoid lighting of areas not intended for nighttime use to avoid
®/ giving a false impression of use or safety. If danger spots are
usually vacant at night, avoid lighting them and close them off
to pedestrians. e
Select and light "safe routes" so that these become the focus of
legitimate pedestrian activity after dark. w
Avoid climbing opportunities by locating light standards and
electrical equipment away from wails or low buildings. e
Use photoelectric rather than time switches for exterior
lighting. e
In projects that will be used primarily by older people
(retirement homes, congregate care facilities, senior and/ or
community centers, etc.) provide higher levels of brightness in
public/common areas. e
Other strategy used:
11
1.8 Mix of Uses Conforms
In mixed use buildings increase opportunities for natural —Revise
surveillance, while protecting privacy. _NA
f �A Comments_
Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 5 of 9 k \Handouts\CPTED Checklist
Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for
Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only
Standard
Strategy
■ applicable during Site Plan Review
6 Applicable during Building Permit Review
Where allowed by city code, locate shops and businesses on
lower floors and residences on upper floors. In this way,
❑ residents can observe the businesses after hours while the
f�Q( residences can be observed by the businesses during business
hours. ■
❑ Include food kiosks, restaurants, etc. within parks and parking
structures. ■
Other strategy: used f
El
I
1.9
Security Bars, Shutters, and Doors
_Conforms
When used and permitted by building and fare codes, security
Revise
bars, shutters, and doors should allow observation of the street
NA
and be consistent with the architectural style of the building.
Comments:
❑ Security bars and security doors should be visually permeable
(see -through). e
Other strategy used:
El
Section a'nd
✓ Functional Area
Evaluation for
Performance
Performance Standard
Agency Use Only
Standard
Strategy
N Applicable during Site Plan Review
e Applicable during Building Permit Review
Section 2.0
Access Control
a
2.1
Building Identification
_Conforms
Ensure buildings are clearly identified by street number to
Revise
prevent unintended access and to assist persons trying to find
NA
the building. Identification signs must conform to FWRC
Comments:
19.140.060. Exempt Signs.
Street numbers should be plainly visible and legible from the
street or road fronting the property. e
Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 6 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist
Section and ✓ Functional Area
Performance Performance Standard
Standard
Strategy
■ Applicable during Site Plan Review
8 Applicable during Building Permit Review
In residential uses, each individual unit should be clearly
numbered. In multiple building complexes, each building entry
❑ should clearly state the unit numbers accessed from than entry.
In addition, unit numbers should be provided on each level or
floor. e
❑ Street numbers should be made of durable materials, preferably
reflective or luminous, and unobstructed (e.g. by foliage). 6
For larger projects, provide location maps (fixed plaque
❑ format) and directional signage at public entry points and along
internal public routes of travel. e
Other strategy used:
2.2 Entrances
Avoid confusion in locating building entrances.
Entrances should be easily recognizable through design
features and directional signage. (Signs must conform to
FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. ■
Minimize the number of entry points. ■
Other strategy used:
El
2.3 Landscaping
Use vegetation as barriers to deter unauthorized access.
❑ Consider using thorny plants as an effective barrier. e
Other strategy used:
2.4 Landscaping Location
Avoid placement of vegetation that would enable access to a
building or to neighboring buildings.
Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 7 of 9
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
_Conforms
Revise
�NA
Comments:
Conforms
Revise
�NA
Comments:
Conforms
—Revise
—Revise
Comments:
k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist
Section and ✓ Functional Area
Performance Performance Standard
Standard
Strategy
N Applicable during Site Plan Review
e Applicable during Building Permit Review
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Avoid placement of large trees, garages, utility structures,
ply
fences, and gutters next to second story windows or balconies
till,
that could provide a means of access. ■
Other strategy used:
2.5
Security
_Conforms
Reduce opportunities for unauthorized access
Revise
�NA
G9mments:
Consider the use of security hardware and/or human measures
❑
to reduce opportunities for unauthorized access. (Applicable
during Certi irate o Occu anC Ins ection).
Other strategy used:
El
2.6
Signage
Conforms
Insure that signage is clearly visible, easy to read and simple
_Revise
to understand [Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060.
NA
Exempt Signs].
I
Comments:
Use strong colors, standard symbols, and simple graplucs for
informational signs. e i
Upon entering the parking area, provide both pedestrians and
For Surface
drivers with a clear understanding of the direction to stairs,
Parking and
elevators, and exits. e
Parking _
Structures
❑
In multi -level parking areas, use creative signage to distinguish
between floors to enable users to easily locate their cars. e
❑ Advise users of security measures that are in place and where
to find them, i.e. security phone or intercom system e
Provide signage in the parking area advising users to lock their
cars. e f
Bulletin #022—January 1, 2011 Page 8 of 9 kA HandoutsTPTED Checklist
Section and
Functional Area
Evaluation for
Performance
Performance Standard
agency Use Only
Standard
Strategy
■ Applicable during Site Plan Review
e Applicable during Building Permit Review
❑ Where exits are closed after hours, ensure this information is
indicated at the parking area entrance. e
Other strategy used:
❑
j
Section 3.0
Ownership
3.1
Maintenance
_ Conforms
Create a "caredfor" image
_Revise
_NA
Comments:
Ensure that landscaping is well maintained, as per FWRC
19.125.090, in order to give an impression of ownership, care,
and security. (Ongoing).
Where possible, design multi -unit residential uses such that no
❑ more than six to eight units share a common building entrance.
n
Other strategy used:
13
3.2
Materials
_Conforms
Use materials, which reduce the opportunity for vandalism.
_Revise
_NA
Camrtmenls:
Consider using strong, wear resistant laminate, impervious
,� ,glazed ceramics, treated masonry products, stainless steel
L� materials, anti-graff d paints, and clear over sprays to reduce
opportunities for vandalism. Avoid flat or porous finishes in
areas where graffiti is likely to be a problem e
I
0111- Where large walls are unavoidable, refer to FWRC
19.125.040(21 ) regarding the use of vegetative screens. e
common area and/or street furniture shall be made of long
wearing vandal resistant materials and secured by sturdy
anchor points, or removed after hours. A
Other strategy used:
Bulletin #022 - January 1, 2011 Page 9 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist
�FederalWay
DATE: November 20, 2012
TO: Matt Herrera
FROM: Kevin Peterson
SUBJECT: TACO TIME - (12-104874-00-UP)
35500 ENCHANTED PKWY S
MEMORANDUM
Public Works Department
Public Works Development Services has reviewed the materials submitted and finds the application complete.
Prior to Land Use and/or Preliminary BSP Approval, please have the applicant address the following Technical
Review comments:
Land Use:
1) All plans showing frontage improvements shall be revised to reflect the City -modified requirements,
as outlined in the Traffic Division's November 16, 2012 review memo (item #5).
2) The civil engineer shall revise Section 1 — Project Overview in the TIR as follows:
a. Second paragraph, last sentence — Future development of the Eastern lot...
b. Third paragraph, second sentence - The Westportion of the lot...
c. Third paragraph, third sentence —The East portion...
3) Revise Section 4 of the TIR as follows:
a. Developed Site Hydrology — There may be some revisions needed in calculating Off -Site
areas, based on the City eliminating the requirement to widen Enchanted Parkway.
Binding Site Plan:
1. Add a north arrow to pages 2 and 3.
2. Dedication of Right of Way shall be via a Statutory Warranty deed.
3. Revise the Account Number (Parcel #) on page 1 to 282104-9106.
CITY OF
Foxt d e ra I Way
REgEIVED
OCT 25 2012
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CDS
MASTED 1 .ND USE APPLICATION
D"ARmmn OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVIUS
33325 8"' Avenue Soull.
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
www.citygffederalway.com
APPLICATION NO(S) /o7- / la `I o I `�' - UP Date
Project Name FcA5r� ! '7;;I-co 77•n '
Property Address/Location 3SSov a -�vT P�eR rs/ so.
Parcel Number(i) Z 821 0 11- i/ o (-
Project Description e oNSTK v y- ?-e,8 / fF / S ry e e, v& T;-co 77ME-
FWZ4 WV I
Type of Permit Required
Annexation
Binding Site Plan
Boundary Liue Adjustment
Comp Plan/Rezone
Land Surface Modification
Lot Line Elimination
Preappiication Conference
Process I (Director's Approval)
Process 11 (Site Plan Review)
Process M (Project Approval)
Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone)
Process VI
SEPA w/Proidct
SEPA Only
Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use
Short Subdivision
Subdivision
Variance: CommnerciaVResidentW
Required Information
Zoning Designation
CO. E. Comprehensive Plan Designation
Value of Proposed Improvements
International Building Code (IBC):
,e4 2 Occupancy Type
Y� Constructiou Type
Applicant
Name. Joh %/k"�Ii!;t7 YYAyti9
Address: 3.3047 /4,%a /C Va s/ey il�v y
City/State: /�Gs7-t" , G✓� 77,OS7
Zip:
Phone: yoG d� r- 2 3 2--
Fax:
Email: feii 222 LAo7`gi�L4v+?
Signature: 1� /
. _
Agent (ifdiff—
crcnt than Applicant)
Name: HZ, 4ej,»vr4
Address- AL
/?o -x
City/State: A--., tea, �J� 3�o.f7'
Zip:
Phone: Syr 27/- /d'7f -
Fax-. r 27/- 2 3l -P3
Email:
Signature:
Owner
Name:
Address:
city/state:
Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Signature: 9-A Orr&
Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page I of 1 k:\Iiandouts\Master Land Use Application
October 17, 2012
Hanna Group
3300 Maple Valley Highway
Renton, Washington 98058
Attn: Ms. Kristen Hanna, Owner
Re: Addendum to Geotechnical Engineering Report
Federal Way Taco Time Restaurant
(Formerly Proposed Golden Corral Restaurant)
35500 Enchanted Parkway S.
Federal Way, Washington
Terracon Project. B215016
Dear Ms. Hanna:
The purpose of this addendum is to provide our evaluation of the above -referenced site in
relation to the newly proposed development. Previously, Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon)
prepared a geotechnical engineering report (J-2383, dated April 24, 2006) for a proposed new
Golden Corral Restaurant site. Current site development plans call for building a new Taco
Time restaurant. We understand that the new structure will be similar in construction but
located slightly south of the structure described in our 2006 report.
Recently, a representative of Terracon visited the subject site to observe surface conditions.
These conditions have not changed since the time of our 2006 report, with the exception of a
significant increase in vegetation. Therefore, provided that the recommendations presented_ in
our previous report are implemented, we are of the opinion that our report -remains applicable to
the current protect.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions,
please contact us.
Sincerely,
Terrac ons It nts,
Paul D. Davis, P.E.
Office Manager
1cb��James M. Brisbine, P.G., P.E.
Senior Engineer RECEIVED
OCT 2 5 2012
Terracon Consultants, Inc. 2115 S. 5611, St., Suite 405 Tacoma, Washington 98409Cm OF FEDERAL WAY
P [253] 573 9939 F [253] 573 9959 terracon.camZDS
1
ZZA ZIDDer Zeman Assoclates� lnc.
' Geotechnical and Environmental Consuitfn9
W�wA 1rerrcon Company
J-2383
April 24, 2046
Golden Northwest Enterprises _
6872 NW Lois Drive
' Silverdale, Washington 93838
' Attention; - Mr. Brian Kim
Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Golden Corral Restaurant
Federal Way, Washington
Dear Mr. Kim:
In accordance with your request and written authorization, Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. (ZZA)
has completed a Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation for the above -
referenced project. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of Golden Northwest Enterprises and
their designers, for specific application to the referenced project and site location.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The authorized scope of services completed by ZZA for this project included a visual site
reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, field and laboratory testing, engineering analyses, and
' preparation of this report. This report was prepared in general accordance with our Proposal for
Geotechnical Engineering Services (P-3187) dated January 27, 2006. Written authorization to
proceed with this evaluation was provided on February 6, 2006.
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
' The subject site is located at 35500 Enchanted Parkway South in Federal Way, Washington and
is recorded as being 2.63 acres in size. The site is bordered to the west by the Enchanted
Parkway South and commercial development, to the north by commmercial development, to the
south by commercial development and South 356th Street and to the east by undeveloped land.
The site is developed with an office building, detached garage and an espresso stand. Several
gravel and mulch storage piles are located in the northeastern quarter of the site and are separated
' by block retaining walls. A few trees and bushes are scattered throughout the site and a small
nursery is located in the approximate center of the site. The site slopes downward to the west at
an average slope of about 10 percent with overall topographic relief on the order of
approximately 40 feet.
We understand that the proposed project will consist of demolition of the existing office building
' and garage, removal of the existing espresso stand, and construction of an approximately 10,700
square foot restaurant with associated parking to the south and east of the building. Based on
18905 33rd Avenue West #117, Lynnwood, WA 98036 425-771-3304 Fax: 425-771-3549
1
'
ZZAGolden
NO
Corral
J-2383
April 24,
Page age 2 2
conversations with the project civil engineer, we understand that the project will likely involve
cut areas on the east side of the site and fill areas on the west side of the site. Rockeries will be
1 constructed near the west side of the restaurant, east of the proposed parking and along the
northern edge of the entire site. However, at the time of this report, no grading information was
available for our review.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
' We completed six tests pits at the approximate locations as presented on Figure 1, Site and
Exploration Plan. Descriptive test pit logs and exploration procedures can be found in Appendix
A of this report. Appendix B contains laboratory testing procedures and results.
In general, test pits TP-1 and TP-2 encountered a couple of inches of topsoil immediately
' underlain by medium dense; gravelly, silty sand to medium stiff to stiff, gravelly, sandy silt to
depths of 2 to 2.5 feet. At this depth, dense to very dense silty, gravelly sand was encountered to
the full depth of the excavation (12 feet). This soil layer is interpreted to be glacial till. Test pits
' TP-1 through TP-3 encountered grass and blackberry bushes over 1 to 2 inches of topsoil that
supported much of the root structure. Test pit TP-4 encountered tree stumps and about 6 inches
of mulch. Medium dense silty gravelly sand that was interpreted as glacial till fill was
' encountered to depths of about 6 inches in test pits TP-3 through TP-5 and to a depth of 1 foot in
test pit TP-4. Fill material consisting of dense, silty sand with varying amounts of gravel was
encountered in test pits TP-5 and TP-6 to depths of 3 and 2'/z feet, respectively. The topsoil,
mulch and fill was underlain by stiff, sandy silt and medium dense silty sand with varying
amounts of gravel to depths of 2 to 4 feet below existing ground surface in test pits TP-3 through
TP-6. This was underlain by very dense, moist, silty, gravelly sand that was interpreted as glacial
till to the full depths of the excavations ranging from 6 to 14 feet below existing ground surface.
Groundwater Conditions
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the explorations. Groundwater conditions should be
expected to fluctuate throughout the year depending upon site utilization, precipitation variation
and other factors. Although we did not observe active seepage, it is typical for perched
groundwater to be present within fill soils overlying a less permeable soil stratum such as the
glacial till.
Seismic Criteria
1 Based on the soil conditions encountered in the test pits advanced at the project site, as well as
our understanding of local geology, the subsurface site conditions are interpreted to correspond
to a Site Class C as defined by 1615.1.1 of the 2003 IBC. Site Class C applies to an average soil
profile within the top 100 feet consisting predominantly of stiff soils. These soils are
characterized by Standard Penetration Test blowcounts greater than 50, a shear wave velocity of
between 1,200 and 2,500 feet per second, and an undrained shear strength greater than 2,000
' pounds per square foot.
IJ-2383 Golden Corral
1
ZZA
GoIden Corral
1-2383
April 24, 2006
'
!
Page 3
Geotechnical earthquake engineering input to development of the general design response
spectrum of the International Building Code 2003 requires a site class definition and short period
' (Ss) and a 1-second period (Si) spectral acceleration values. The USGS National Seismic Hazard
Mapping Project (http://egliazmaps.usgs.0 o computes the 1996 spectral ordinates (5 percent
damping) at periods of 0.2 and 1.0 seconds for ground motions at the project site with a 2 percent
' probability of exceedance in 50 years as 1.23g and 0.39g. Therefore, we recommend that Ss and
Sl be assigned values of 1.23 and 0.39, respectively. We recommend that the ground motion
values presented in Figures 1615(1) and 1615(2) of the 2003 IBC be used to confirm the
appropriate design accelerations.
The site soils are not considered to be prone to liquefaction due to its relative density, grain size
distribution, and the lack of saturated soil conditions. The potential for seismic related settlement
is considered low. Based on our analyses, foundation bearing capacity failure is considered
unlikely, and settlement of greater than 1 inch is considered unlikely during a design -level
' earthquake.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1 In our opinion the proposed development appears feasible from a geotechnical engineering
standpoint. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the excavations, it is our opinion
' that the building can be supported by the medium dense or better native soils on conventional
shallow foundations. The design recommendations presented in this report are based on the
observed soil conditions and on the assumption that earthwork for site grading, utilities,
' foundations, retaining walls, and pavements will be monitored by a qualified geotechnical
engineer from ZZA.
' Site Preparation
Clearing and Stri in : Site preparation will require removing surface vegetation and organic -
rich topsoil, or other deleterious materials in planned building and pavement areas. In addition,
existing fill soils present within the planned building footprint should be removed. We estimate
that the average topsoil thickness varies between approximately 1 to 2 inches where grass and
tblackberry bushes are present on the north side of the property. In addition, areas of deeper
organics should be expected to be encountered where trees and old mulch piles are present. The
stripped topsoil and roots should be considered unsuitable for reuse as structural fill. Actual
removal depths should be determined by a qualified geotechnical engineer at the time of grading
based on the subgrade material's organic content and stability.
' Drainage_ Considerations: Stripping, excavation, grading, and subgrade preparation should be
performed in a manner and sequence that will provide drainage at all times and provide proper
control of erosion, Although groundwater was not encountered in any of the explorations
perched groundwater can develop above the glacial till contact after periods of extended
precipitation. Accumulated water must be removed from work areas immediately prior to
performing further work in the area. Equipment access may be limited and the amount of soil
J-2383 Golden Corral
�� Golden Corral
J-2383
April 24, 2006
age
Page 4
4
' rendered unfit for use as structural fill may be greatly increased if drainage efforts are not
accomplished in a timely manner.
' Existing Structures: A one story office building with an attached garage was located in the
western half of the property at the:time of our investigation. In addition, a drive -through espresso
stand was located north and west of the office building. Any existing underground structures
(e.g., septic tanks, wells, pipelines, foundations, utilities, etc.) should be removed, relocated, or
abandoned, as necessary, in accordance with all local, state and federal regulations. Localized
excavations made for removal of structures, utilities, and the removal of unsuitable fill materials
-should be prepared in accordance with the Subgrade Preparation section of this report. The
overexcavation should be backfilled with structural fill material placed and compacted in
1 accordance with the Fill Placement and Compaction sections of this report.
On -Site Soil Considerations: The on -site soils disclosed in all the test pits are considered to be
' sensitive to moisture due to the relatively high fines content of the soils. Thus, if construction
activities take place during extended wet weather periods, or if the in -situ moisture conditions
are elevated above the optimum moisture content, they could become soft, yielding, or unable to
' be compacted to required criteria. This may require the use of import granular fill if the site soils
become too wet to obtain adequate compaction.
Subgrade Preparation: Prior to placing fill, we recommend that the exposed subgrade within the
building and pavement areas should be proofrolled with heavy rubber -tired construction
equipment, such as a fully -loaded tandem -axle dump truck, (in the presence of the geotechnical
' engineer) to detect soft and/or yielding soils. The exposed subgrade soils should be firm,
unyielding, and meet a minimum compaction of 95 percent of the maximum laboratory density,
as determined by ASTM D-1557. In the event that compaction fails to meet the specified
' criteria, the upper 12 inches of subgrade should be scarified and moisture conditioned, as
necessary to obtain at least 95 percent of the maximum laboratory density. Those soils which are
soft, yielding, or unable to be compacted to the specified criteria should be overexcavated and
?' replaced with suitable material. Overexcavations should be backfilled with structural fill material
placed and compacted in accordance with the Structural Fill section of this report. Subgrade
preparation and selection, placement, and compaction of structural fill should be performed
' under engineering controlled conditions in accordance with the project specifications.
Frozen Sub ade Soils: If earthwork takes place during freezing conditions, all exposed
' subgrades should be allowed to thaw and then be recompacted prior to placing subsequent lifts of
structural fill or foundation components. Alternatively, the frozen material could be stripped
' from the subgrade to reveal unfrozen soil prior to placing subsequent lifts of fill or foundation
components. The frozen soil should not be reused as structural fill until allowed to thaw and
adjusted to the proper moisture content, which may not be possible during winter months.
Geotechnical Monitoring: The Geotechnical Engineer of record should be present during site
preparation operations to observe stripping and grubbing depths, observe the removal of buried
' structures, such as underground utilities, or foundations, observe the proof rolling operations, and
to evaluate the exposed subgrade.
' J-2383 Golden Corral
ZZA
' R ,a
1 Structural Fill
Golden Corral
J-2383
April 24, 2006
Page 5
' The following sections present our recommendations for compaction and placement of structural
fill. Structural fill includes any fill material placed under footings, pavements, or other
permanent structures or facilities.
' SubUade Verification and Compaction Testing: Regardless of material or location, all fill
material should be placed over properly compacted subgrades in accordance with the Site
' Preparation section of this report. The condition of all subgrades should be verified by the
Geotechnical Engineer before fill placement or earthwork grading begins. Earthwork monitoring
and field density testing should be performed during grading to provide a basis for opinions
concerning the degree of soil compaction attained.
Laboratory Testing: Representative samples of materials to be utilized as compacted fill should
be analyzed in a laboratory to determine their physical properties. If any material other than that
previously tested is encountered during grading, the appropriate analysis of this material should
be conducted. Samples should be submitted at least 72 hours prior to importing to the site.
' Re -Use of On -Site Soils: With the exception of the organic -rich topsoil and fill containing
deleterious material, it is our opinion that the soils encountered on the site are considered suitable
for reuse as structural fill from a compositional standpoint. Organic -rich soil is defined as soils
having 5% or more organics. Organic -rich soil was disclosed in test pit TP-6 at a depth of 1 foot
and is likely present to depths of 2'/z feet at this location due to indications that this is the
location of an older mulch storage area. Provided the soil does not contain significant organic
content or other deleterious materials, and is placed and compacted in accordance with the
Compaction Criteria section of this report, the on -site soils may be reused as structural fill for
' foundation and pavement support
Re -Use of Topsoil: The organic -rich soils may be used in non-structural areas, e.g., landscape
areas, provided settlements beyond what is typical in building and parking areas can be tolerated.
Otherwise, it should be wasted from the site.
' Imported Structural Fill Material: Materials typically used for imported structural fill include
pit -run sand and gravel, various mixtures of sand, silt and gravel, and crushed recycled concrete.
1 Recycled concrete is suitable for structural fill provided the material is thoroughly crushed to a
well -graded, 2- to 3-inch minus product and is free of deleterious materials such as wood.
Structural fill materials should be free of deleterious, organic, or frozen matter and should
' containino chemicals that may result in the material being classified as "contaminated". Imported
fill should meet the requirements of section 9-03.14(1), Gravel Borrow as presented in WSDOT
2006 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction: _..
Fill Placement: Fill material should be moisture conditioned and compacted in controlled
horizontal layers not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness, and each layer should be thoroughly
' compacted to the required level with suitable equipment for the soil conditions.
' 7-2383 Golden Corral
ZZA
Golden Corral
1.2383
April 24, 2006
Page 6
Compaction Criteria: Each layer of fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the
maximum laboratory dry density as determined by the ASTM D-1557 Modified Proctor
Compaction Test. Where moisture content of the fill or density testing yields compaction results
less than 95 percent, additional compaction effort and/or moisture conditioning, as necessary,
should be performed, until the fill material is in accordance with the compaction requirements.
Fill Material - Moisture Content: All fill material placed must be moisture conditioned, as
necessary, to within ±2 percent of the optimum moisture content for compaction. If excessive
moisture in the fill results in failing results or an unacceptable "pumping" or yielding condition,
then the fill should be allowed to dry until the moisture content is within the necessary range to
meet the required compaction requirements or reworked until acceptable conditions are obtained.
Shallow Foundations
' In our opinion, conventional spread footings are suitable for support of the proposed building,
provided the bearing soils are prepared in accordance with the recommendations presented
herein.
I
Bearing Sub ade: We recommend that the foundations be supported on a properly prepared
native medium dense or better subgrade or on structural fill placed above suitable native soils for
uniform foundation support. Foundations should not be supported on loose soils or
undocumented fill soils. Fill soils containing organic material were encountered in test pit TP-6
in the approximate southeast corner of the planned restaurant to a depth of 2'/2 feet below
existing ground surface. In order to limit foundation and floor slab settlements to within
tolerable limits, we recommend that these soils be overexcavated and replaced with structural
fill.
Subgrade Verification: The foundation subgrade should be observed and probed in the field by a
qualified ZZA representative prior to placement of any formwork, reinforcement steel, structural
fill, or concrete. All footing subgrades should be founded in those soils described in the Bearing
Subgr ade section of this report. Zones of loose, soft or otherwise unsuitable soil encountered in
the footing subgrade should be overexcavated and replaced with properly compacted structural
fill or lean -mix concrete with a minimum 125 psi 28-day compressive strength. The
overexcavation should extend laterally away from the base of the overexcavation a distance
equal to the depth of the overexcavation.
Bearing Pressures: Continuous or column footings bearing directly on those soils recommended
in the Bearing Subgrade section of this report may be designed for a maximum allowable, net,
bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. A one-third increase of the bearing pressure may be used for
short-term dynamic loads such as wind and seismic forces. -:
Shallow Footing Depth and Width: The bottoms of all exterior footings should bear at least 18
inches below adjacent outside grade. We recommend that all continuous (wall) and isolated
(column) footings be at least 18 and 24 inches wide, respectively.
J-2383 Golden Corral
it
Golden Corral
2'
]-2383
Aprll 24, 2006
Page 7
Settlement: Assuming the foundation subgrade soils are prepared and the foundation elements
are designed in accordance with recommendations contained herein, we estimate that total and
differential settlements will be less than one inch and 4 inch, respectively.
IDrainage Considerations
I' Perimeter Footing Drains: We recommend a perimeter foundation drainage system around the
building. Drains are also recommended behind all retaining walls. Retaining wall drainage
I systems should be sloped to drain by gravity to a suitable discharge location. Water from
downspouts and surface water should be independently collected and routed to a storm water
management system. Additionally, we recommend that the finished grades around the building
' be designed to route surface water away from the canopy.
Perimeter Building Grades: Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage
from the building area at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or to collect adjacent to
foundations or within the immediate building area. We recommend that a gradient of at least 3
percent for a minimum distance of 10 feet from the building perimeter be provided, except in
paved locations. In paved areas, a minimum gradient of one percent should be provided.
Slab -On -Grade Floors
I ■ We anticipate that concrete slab -on -grade floors are planned for the restaurant. The slab -on -
grade should be founded directly on compacted native soils or at least one foot structural fill
compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557)
placed above compacted native soils. The subgrade soils below the structural fill should consist
of native soils. The slab subgrade should be observed by a ZZA representative to determine if
' soft or otherwise unsuitable soils are present below the slab -on -grade.
We recommend that the floor slab be underlain by at least 6 inches of clean, well -graded sand
' and gravel to function as a capillary break. Material consisting of sand and gravel with no more
than 10 percent passing the No. 10 sieve and no more than 3 percent fines content be used as the
capillary break material. An impervious vapor barrier, such as Visqueen, is recommended
' between the capillary break and the slab. We recommend the use of a puncture -resistant, 6-mil
or thicker vapor barrier for use directly under the slab. The edges of the vapor barrier should
overlap at least 12 inches and be sealed with tape or in accordance with the manufacturer's
' recommendations. The moisture protection details should be reviewed by the architect and
owner and additional, more stringent moisture protection details should be specified if required
for protection.of floor finishes. We recommend that the designer and contractor refer to ACI 302
for procedures and cautions regarding the use and placement of a vapor barrier.
Backfilled Walls and Retaining Structures
1 The following parameters are recommended for the design of rigid, laterally loaded retaining
1 structures, including concrete retaining walls, founded on properly compacted native soil or
structural fill, with level, clean, granular backfill. These values are not applicable to sloping
I
J-2383 Golden Corral
ri
ZZA
Golden Corral
J-2383
April 24, 2006
Page 8
backfills, backfills composed of non -granular soil materials, basement walls, braced walls, or
tied -back walls or for walls greater than 12 feet in height.
Rockery Considerations
Rockery construction is craft and depends greatly on the experience of the contractor'
constructing the rockery. Rockeries are not typical retaining structures, but more of a weathering
and erosion protection facing for stable cut and fill slopes. Therefore, the degree of retention is
greatly dependent on the size and competency of the rock facing and drainage provided.
It appears that rockeries may be used as part of the potential grading for the project. It appears
that cut rockeries may be utilized along the eastern portions of the site and potentially at the
western edge of the site. These rockeries will likely expose dense glacial till for a good portion
of the rockery. Provided these assumptions are true, it is our opinion that the rockeries are
feasible for this project.
In addition, a few other geotechnical considerations need to be addressed for the rockeries.
• In order to provide drainage behind the rockeries, a footing drain as described in the
Permanent Drainage section should be placed at the base of -all rockeries and a
minimum 12-inch width of clean, 2- to 4-inch crushed quarry rock be placed behind
the rock facing for the full height of the rockery;
• The rockeries should be spaced such that no rockeries, adjacent footings, and drive
lanes or parking areas are located within a distance of 11a tirries the height of the
rockery;
' • Minimum width of the base rock should be one-third the overall height of the
rockeries or a three-man rock, whichever is greater;
• The base rock should be embedded a minimum of 12-inches; and
' We recommend that the rockeries be constructed in accordance with the recommendations set
out in the Associated Rockery Contractors (ARC) Standard Rockery Construction Guidelines
and that an experienced rockery contractor be contracted to perform the construction.
Wall Draina e: To preclude the build-up of hydrostatic pressure, we recommend that a
minimum width of 2 feet of clean, granular; free -draining material should extend from the
footing drain at the base of the wall to the ground surface, to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic
forces. Wall drain aggregate should conform to the 2006 WSDOT Standard Specification
Gravel Backf ll fW`Walls. If aggregate such as 9-03.12(4), Gravel Backf ll for Drains, or 9-
' 03.12(5) Gravel Backfill for Drywells, is used, we recommend that it be separated from the
backfili soils with a non -woven filter fabric such as Mirafi 140N or equivalent. It should be
' realized that the primary purpose of the free draining material is reduction in hydrostatic
pressures. Alternately, the walls should be designed for full hydrostatic conditions.
Backfill Compaction: To prevent the build-up of lateral soil pressures in excess of the
recommended design pressures, over -compaction of the fill behind the wall should be avoided;
1 J-2383 Golden Corral
ZZAGolden Corral
'OWN M. -2383
April 24, 2006
Page 9
' however, a lesser degree of compaction may permit excessive post -construction settlements.
Backfill above a 60-degree plane projected upward from the base of the wall footing should be
' placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose depth and compacted by small, hand -
operated compaction equipment to about 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry
density. Remaining backfill should be compacted in accordance with the compaction
' recommendations provided in the Fill Placement and Compaction Criteria sections of this
report.
' Grading and Capping: To retard the infiltration of surface water into the wall backfill soils, the
backfill surface of exterior walls should be adequately sloped to drain away from the wall. We
also recommend that the backfill surface directly behind the wall be capped with asphalt,
' concrete, or one foot of low -permeability soil. If. low permeability soils are used as a cap, we
recommend that a separation fabric (similar to Mirafi 140N) be placed above the drainage
aggregate prior to placing the cap material.
' A lied Loads: Overturning and sliding loads applied to retaining walls can be classified as
active, at -rest, surcharge, and hydrostatic pressures. Our recommended methods of calculating
' design pressures are discussed in the following paragraphs.
• Active and At -Rest Pressures: Yielding (cantilever) retaining walls should be designed to
withstand an appropriate active lateral earth pressure, whereas non -yielding (restrained) walls
should be designed to withstand an appropriate at -rest lateral earth pressure. The at -rest case
is applicable where retaining wall movement is confined to less than 0.005 H, where H is the
wall height. If greater movement is possible, the active case applies. A wall movement of
about 0.02 H will be required to develop the full passive pressure. These pressures act over
the entire back of the wall and vary with the backslope inclination. For retaining walls up to
' 12 feet in height with a level backslope, we recommend using active and at -rest pressures
(given as equivalent fluid unit weights) of 35 and 55 pcf, respectively.
' • Surchar a Pressures: The above equivalent fluid pressures are based on the assumption of a
uniforrn horizontal backfill and no buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall.
' Surcharge pressures due to sloping ground, adjacent footings, vehicles, construction
equipment, etc. must be added to these values.
' H�>Mostatic Pressures: If groundwater is allowed to saturate the backfill soils, hydrostatic
pressures will act against a retaining wall; however, if the recommended drainage system is
included with each retaining wall, we do not expect that hydrostatic pressures will develop.
' Resisting Forces: Active and at -rest pressures for conventional retaining wall foundations are
jrpsisted by a combination of passive lateral earth pressure, base friction, and subgrade bearing
capacity. Passive pressure acts over that portion of the embedded of the walls more than 18
inches below the finished surface grade. For retaining walls with a level foreslope and zero
hydrostatic pressure behind the wall, we recommend using allowable design values of 300 pcf
' and 0.35 for passive pressure and base friction coefficient, respectively. These values include a
safety factor of 1.5.
I
J-2383 Golden Corral
'ZZA
Golden Corral
'V1.J-2383
April 24, 2006
Page 10
r�.r.
I.Uity Penetrations Through BackfdW-Walls: Care should be taken where utilities penetrate
through backfilled walls.
Minor settlement of the wall backfill soils can impart significant soil
'
loading on utilities, and some form of flexible connection may be appropriate at backfilled wall
penetrations:
'
Pavement Design
' Pavement Maintenance: Pavement design is a compromise between high initial cost and low
maintenance, and low initial cost coupled with a need for periodic repairs. As a result, the owner
should take part in development of an appropriate pavement section. Critical features which
' determine the durability of the surfacing include the stability of the subgrade, presence or
absence of moisture, free water, organics, the fines content of the subgrade soils, traffic volumes,
and frequency of use of heavy vehicles.
' Submde Preparation: We recommend that all structural fill soils placed beneath pavement
sections be compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density for
' that material. In cut areas, we recommend that the subgrade be prepared as recommended in the
Site Preparation section, with the exposed subgrade compacted to a dense and non -yielding
condition.
' As halt Thickness: For pavement areas on native soils or structural fill, we recommend the
following minimum pavement sections be used:
m Auto Parkin Area; Three inches asphaltic concrete over four inches crushed aggregate
base course.
1 • DrivewM, Fire Lanes and Hem Traffic Areas: Four inches asphaltic concrete over five
inches of crushed aggregate base course.
Although a variety of less costly pavement sections are available, we recommend these sections
in consideration of the anticipated subgrade soils, usage and design life. A minimum 3-inch
' thickness of asphaltic concrete is now recommended by the Asphalt Institute, even for car
parking areas. We are available to provide alternative pavement sections, if required, taking into
the consideration the possibility of reduced design life and more frequent maintenance. For
example, ATB could be considered in lieu of crushed rock if protection of the subgrade is
required due to scheduling of earthwork.
Sub de Sails: The native subgrade soils are anticipated to consist of sandy silt and silty sand
with varying amounts of gravel and cobbles. We anticipate that the eastern half of the site will he
a ' hf area and the cuts will extend into the native, glacial. till. All fill used to raise low area;y
' must have pavement support characteristics at least equivalent to the existing soils and must be
placed under engineering controlled conditions.
' Base and Asphalt Ntater als: The pavement design recommendations assume that the subgrade
and any structural fill will be prepared in accordance with the recommendations presented in this
' J-2383 Golden Corral
I
0
P
L
ZZAGolden
Corral
]-2383
April 24, 2006
Wr■
Page 1 ]
report. All fill, as well as the upper 12 inches beneath the pavement surface should be
compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction, using AASHTO T-180 (ASTM: D-
1557). Specifications for manufacturing and placement of pavements and crushed top course
should conform to specifications presented in Divisions 5 and 4, respectively, of the 2006
Washington State Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications for Roads, Bridges,
and Municipal Construction.
We recommend that the crushed aggregate base course conform to WSDOT Standard
Specification Section 9-03.9(3). In lieu of crushed gravel base, asphalt -treated base (ATB) can
be substituted. The ATB would provide a more durable wearing surface if the pavement
subgrade areas will be exposed to construction traffic prior to final paving with hot -mix asphalt.
We recommend that the asphalt cement conform to Section 9-02.1(4) for PG 64-22 Performance
Grade Asphalt Cement. We also recommend that the gradation of the asphalt aggregate conform
to the aggregate control points for % inch or 3/ inch mixes as presented in Section 9-03.8(6),
HMA Proportions of Materials.
CLOSURE
The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based, in part, on the
explorations accomplished for this study. The number, location, and depth of the explorations
were completed within the constraints of budget and site access so as to yield the information to
formulate the recommendations. Project plans were in the preliminary stage at the time of this
report preparation. We therefore recommend that ZZA be provided the opportunity to review the
project plans and specifications when they become available in order to confirm that the
recommendations and design considerations presented in this report have been properly
interpreted and implemented into the project design package.
The integrity of earthwork, structural fill, and foundation and pavement performance depend
greatly on proper site preparation and construction procedures. We recommend that ZZA be
retained to provide geotechnical engineering services during the earthwork -related construction
phases of the project. If variations in the subsurface conditions are observed at that time, a
qualified engineer would be able to provide additional geotechnical engineering
recommendations to the contractor and design team in a timely manner as the project
construction progresses.
The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based upon the data obtained
from the borings performed at the indicated locations and from other information discussed in
this report. This report does nofteflect variations that may occur between borings, across the site,
or due to the modifying effects of weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not
become evident until during or after construction. If variations appear, we should be immediately
notified so that further evaluation and supplemental recommendations can be provided.
The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any
environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or
J-2383 Golden Corral
r
;2A Golden Corral
2 )- 383
April 24,
Pagege 12 l2
rprevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the
potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken.
rThis report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to the
project discussed and had been prepared in accordance with generally accaoted geotechnical
engineering practices. No warranties, either expressed or implied, are intended or made. Site
safety, excavation support, and dewatering requirements are the responsibility of others. In the
event that changes in the nature, design, or location of the project as outlined in this report are
' planned, the conclusions acid recommendation contained in thes report should not be considered
valid unless ZZA reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this
report in writing.
' We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service on this project and would p � be pleased to
discuss the contents of this report or other aspects of this project with you at your convenience.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. "
Respectfully submitted,
Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc.
J
Barbara A. Gallagher. E.I.T.
Staff Engineer
John E. Zipper,
President
EXPIRES f j 24 ( O`%'
Enclosures: Figure 1 — Site and Exploration Plan
' Appendix A — Fielffrocedures and Exploration Logs
Appendix B — Laboratory Testing and Classification
rDistribution: 2 copies to Jenelle Taflin/PacLand
1 1-2383 Golden Corral
q�
i
l
i,
I
1
i
t
i
i�
L
-
1
ZZA
tJ-2383
Golden Corral
APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES AND LOGS
Golden Corral
J-2383
April 24, 2006
Page 13
ZZA Golden Corral
NO
& ]-2383
April 24, 2383
Page 14
1
' J-2383
FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
Our field exploration programs for this project included completion of 6 test pits on
February 20, 2006. The approximate locations of all of the explorations completed to date are
presented on Figure 1, the Site and Exploration Plan. Exploration locations for the evaluation of
the restaurant, drives, and parking lot were, in part, determined by representatives of ZZA by
' measuring distances from existing site features with a tape relative to the Conceptual Site Plan,
dated January 12, 2006. As such, the exploration locations should be considered accurate to the
degree implied by the measurement method. The following sections describe our procedures
' associated with the exploration. Descriptive logs of the explorations are enclosed in this
appendix.
' Test Pit Procedures
' Test pits were excavated with a rubber -tired backhoe, operated by an independent
excavation firm (Larson Excavating) working as a subcontractor to ZZA. A representative of
our firm continuously logged the test pits.
' The test pit logs presented in this appendix are based upon the excavation characteristics,
observation of the samples secured, laboratory test results, and field logs. The various types of
' soils are indicated as well as the depth where the soils or characteristics of the soils changed. It
should be noted that these changes may have been gradual, and if the changes occurred between
sample intervals, they were inferred.
f
1 J-2383 Golden Corral
' PROJECT: Golden Corral
Location: Federal Way. V
11
fl
I
JOB No. J-2383 , TEST PITS 1-6 PAGE i OF2
Elevation: NIA
Test Pit TP-1
Depth (feel) Material Descri tivn Sample No.
0.0 — 2.0 Grass over 1-inch topsoil over stiff, moist, red -brown, S-1 @ 1 foot
gravelly, sandy SILT with trace cobbles MC =18 %
FC = 66%
2.0 — 12.0 Dense to very dense, moist, gray, silty, gravelly SAND with S-2 @ 12.0 feet
trace cobbles (Glacial Till) MC = 11 %
Test Pit completed at 12 feet below existing ground surface.
No groundwater seepage observed.
Test Pit TP-2
Depth(feet) Material Description Sam le No.
0.0 — 2.5 Grass and blackberry bushes over 2-inches topsoil over S- I @ 1.0 feet
medium dense, moist, red -brown, gravelly, silty SAND with MC = 10%
trace cobbles
2.5 — 12.0 Dense to very dense, moist, gray, silty, gravelly SAND with S-2 @ 10.0 feet
trace cobbles (Glacial Till) MC =10 %
Test Pit completed at 12 feet below existing ground surface.
No groundwater seepage observed.
Test Pit TP-3
Depth (feed Material Description Sample No.
0.0 — 0.5 Grass and blackberry bushes over 2-inches topsoil over
medium dense, moist, gray, silty, gravelly SAND (Till Fill)
0.5 — 3.0 Stiff, moist, red -brown, gravelly, sandy SILT with trace S-1 @ 1.0 foot
cobbles MC = 14%
3.0 — 11.0 Very dense, moist, gray, silty, gravelly SAND with some S-2 @ 8.0 feet
cobbles (Glacial Till) MC = 10%
Test Pit completed at 11 feet below existing ground surface.
No groundwater seepage observed.
Test Pit TP-4
DepthSfeet) Material Description
Sample No.
0.0 —
0.5 Tree stumps and brush over mulch
0.5 —1.0
Medium dense, moist, gray, silty, gravelly SAND (Till Fill)
1.0 —
4.0 Medium dense to dense, moist, brown, silty SAND with
S-1 @ 1.5 feet
trace to some gravel
MC = 18°%
4.0 —14.0
Very dense, moist, gray, silty, gravelly SAND with trace
S-2 @ 10.0 feet
cobbles (Glacial Till)
MC = 10%
Test Pit completed at 14 feet below existing ground surface.
No groundwater seepage observed.
Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. TEST PIT LOGS
FIGURE 2
Geotechnlcal & Environmental Consulting Date Logged: 2120/2006
Logged by: BAG
' PROJECT: Golden Corral JOB No. J-2883 TEST PITS 9-6 PAGE 2 OF2
Location: Federal Way, Washington
Approximate Elevation: N/A
Test Pit TP-5
Depth feet Material Description Sample No.
'
0.0 -- 0.5 Sparse grass over'/z inch topsoil over Medium dense, moist,
gray, silty, gravelly SAND (Till Fill)
0.5 — 3.0 Medium dense, moist, brown, silty SAND with trace to some S-1 @ 1.5 feet
'
gravel (Fill) (1-inch irrigation line @ 1.0 feet) MC = 12%
3.0 -- 6.0 Very dense, moist, gray, silty, gravelly SAND with trace S-2 @ 6.0 feet
cobbles (Glacial Till) MC = 12%
'
Test Pit completed at 6 feet below existing ground surface.
No groundwater seepage observed.
'
Test Pit TP-6
Depth (feet) Material Description Sample No.
'
0.0 — 2.5 Loose to medium dense, moist, dark brown, silty, gravelly S-1 @ 1.0 feet
SAND with trace wood (Fill) (1-inch irrigation line @ 1.0 MC = 15%
feet) Organics = 7%
1
2.5 — 4.0 Medium dense to dense, moist, brown, silty, gravelly SAND S-2 @ 3.0 feet
MC = 15%
4.0 — 12.0 Very dense, moist, gray, silty, gravelly SAND with trace S-3 @ 12.0 feet
cobbles (Glacial Till) MC = 12%
Test Pit completed at 12 feet below existing ground surface.
No groundwater seepage observed.
1
1
1
1
1
1
--Zipper
:',,.°'-, Zeman Associates, Inc.
TEST PIT LOOS
FIGURE 2
Date Logged. 2120/2006
i Logged by: BAG
—�-- Geotechnical & Environmental Consulting
1
ZZA
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
Golden Corral
]-2383
April 24, 2006
Page 15
J-2383 Golden Corral
I
Golden Corral
1-2383
April 24, 2006
Page 16
J-2383
LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES
A series of laboratory tests were performed during the course of this study to evaluate the
index and geotechnical engineering properties of the subsurface soils. Descriptions of the types
of tests performed are given below.
Visual Classification
Samples recovered from the exploration locations were visually classified in the field
during the exploration program. Representative portions of the samples were carefully packaged
in moisture tight containers and transported to our laboratory where the field classifications were
verified or modified as required. Visual classification was generally done in accordance with the
Unified Soil Classification system. Visual soil classification includes evaluation of color,
relative moisture content, soil type based upon grain size, and accessory soil types included in
the sample. Soil classifications are presented on the exploration logs in Appendix A.
Moisture Content Determinations
Moisture content determinations were performed on representative samples obtained
from the exploration in order to aid in identification and correlation of soil types. The
determinations were made in general accordance with the test procedures described in ASTM:
D-2216. The results are shown on the exploration logs in Appendix A and noted as MC.
200 Wash
A 200 wash determines the percent of material contained in a soil sample that is finer that
a 75gm (No.200) sieve. A 200 wash analyses was performed on a representative sample in
general accordance with ASTM: D-1140. The results of this analysis for the sample was used in
classification of the soil, and is presented on the exploration log as fines content, noted as FC.
Grain Size Analysis
A grain size analysis indicates the range . in diameter of soil particles included in a
particular sample. Grain size analyses were performed on representative samples in general
accordance with ASTM: D-422. The results of the grain size determinations. for the samples
were used in classification of the soils, and are presented in this appendix.
Organic Content Test
The organic content of one near -surface sample was determined by AASHTO T-267,
Organic Content by Loss on Ignition.
1 1-2383 Golden Corral
I
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS Test Results Summary ASTM D 422
SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE HYDROMETER
36' 12' 8' 3- 11Q. VV 318' 4 10 20 d0 60 140 200
10
I
9
F--
28
�7
W
7
_
WI
tY fi
W
'
Z
z 5
I
1
W
U
W
a
3
-
_...
I
1
1000.000 100.000 10.000 1.000 0.100 0.010 0.001
PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
Coarse
Fine
Coarse
Medium Fine SIR
Clay
GRAVEL
SAND FINE
GRAINED
BOULDERS
COBBLES
Comments:
Exploration
Sample
Depth (feet)
Moisture (%) Fines
(%� I
Description
TP-3
S-2
8
10
21.7
silty gravelly SAND
ZZA
JOB NO: J-2383
PROJECT NAME:
er JJppZeman AssociaiesTlnc.
Geotechnlcal and Environmental Consulting
DATE OF TESTING: 2/27/2006
Golden Corral