The URL can be used to link to this page

09-102979nrr of; Federal February 19, 2610 Enrico Galliano 1837 Camas Avenue Renton, WA 98056-2702 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue outh ILE Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-971 a (253) 83.5-7000 www. cityofiederalway. com RE: File 09-102979_00-UP, STEEL LAKE PLAZA 29020 NVlihtary Road South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Galliano: The City of Federal Way has completed the Land Use Process III review of the construction of a one- story, 17,017 square -foot commercial retail building. Project includes 70 new parldng stalls, landscaping, and associated site improvements. The application was submitted on Au application submitted on Au gust 4, 2009. The site plan August 4, 2009, and the subsequent res�tbmittals on October 21, 2009, are hereby approved per the enclosed Exhibit A, Findings for project Approval. The remainder of this letter outlines future review processes required, gives a brief summary State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) to date, and outlines procedure eof lating to appeals drocess under e pprovaI periods for this decision. Additional requirements will be provided as City departttients review the building Permits submitted for the improvements g REMW PROCESSI&S RiEQuIni) Zoning for the subject site is Neighborhood Business (BN). RetaiUOffice/Tavern is an allowed use in this gone under Ferleral .020 Entertainment. Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.215.010 Retail and FW:RC 19.215 The Retail/Entertainment use is normally reviewed under the Process 11 Project Approval However, a Strtte Erivirotzrrreratal Policy Act (SEPA) review was Pro" triggered due to the square footageprof the building. Therefore, the City reviewed this project under a Process III review. Project approval does not grant license to begin any type of site work. CONDITIONS The fallowing conditions must be met prior to the issuance of building permits: L Applicant must construct the TIP improvements listed in Item 11 of the Findings of Project Approval and City of Federal Way Concurrency Analysis #09-104437-CN prior to issuance of any building permit or pay a pro-rata share contribution in the amount of $182,672. 2. The sidewalk connecting Military Road South to the west side of "Building A" must be stamped or colored. 3. For any future larger tenants, -not including parking ratio larger tthe approved 3,500 square -foot pub/tavern, that has a n I space for every 300 square feet, a parking study must be submi with any land use, building, or business permit application. tted SEPA PRocEss A Notice of Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on December 9, 2009. There were no appeal Period for this determination was completed on Janucomments regarding the application. The City issued the formal DNS on December 23, 2009, and the ary 6, 2010, with no appeals filed. Mr. Galliano February 19, 2010 Page 2 PROCEDLT.AL 1NzOpKATION period of five Unless modified or appealed, the Project approval decision th � �l�e years of the dare of �ssua from die a to a£ issuance of the decision. If -y further extension is tak ranted only if a written request is submitted to the decision will expire. One, t�vo-year extension may be p, y evel°pinent Services, 33325 8`�` Avenue South, PO Sax 9718, Federal Way, Department of Community D WA 98063-9718, at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the decision. be appealed b the applicant pursuant to FWRC 19.65.120. Any The project approval decision may pp y appeal must be in the form of a letter deiiveredto e Department of WA � 063-97181, a d be accompanied by thec�, 33325 8`'' Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, established fee, within 14 calendar days after the effective date of issuance F e of tthisd decision. The effective f f appeal tive date of issuance is the date of the decision plus three caleadard a statement of the factual findings letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealedpersonputed by the filing the and conclusions of the Director of Community Development Services e toewai�e the appeal period through appeal. Being that you are the only party of interest, youy P filing a letter with the City of Federal Way waiving your right to appeal this decision. This decision does not constitute i�uilding permit approval, and it does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, Policies, and standards re la on lig to this development. Constructi permits are required for the proposed improvements. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact David Lee, Associate Planner, 253-835- 2622. Sincerely, Greg Fewins, Director Community Development Services enc: Exhibit A -Findings for Approval Approved Site Plan c: . David Lee, Associate Planner Doc I.D.52992 09-102979 CQTY OF � s Federal STEEL LAKE PLAZA FINDINGS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL FILE #09-102979-00-UP FILE The following are findings for recommending approval of a new retail development with associated site improvements located at 29020 Military Road South, Federal. Way, WA. I. The applicant proposes the construction of a one-story, 17,017 square -foot commercial retail building. Project includes 70 new parking stalls, landscaping, and associated site improvements. 2. Zoning for the subject site is Neighborhood Business (BN). Retail uses are permitted in the BN zoning district pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.215.020 subject to Process M, Project Approval. The Federal Way Co1nprelaerrsive Plan (FWCP) designation for the subject site is Neighborhood Business. 3. The City issued a Notice of Land Use Application on September 2, 2009, following determination of a complete application. A fourteen -day comment period resulted from the notice date. No comments were received on the land use application or SEPA Checklist notice. 4. The responsible official of the City of Federal Way issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on December 9, 2009, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The fourteen -day appeal period for the determination was completed January 6, 2010, with no corrections to the city's initial determination. he final staff evaluation for the environmental checklist, Federal Way File #09-102980-00-SE, is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. 5. Drainage components shall conform to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City amendments. The project lies within a Level 1 flow control area, thus the applicant has designed a flow control facility to meet this performance criteria. The project also lies within a Basic Water Quality Area. Water Quality Treatment shall be designed to meet the treatment criteria of the Basic Water Quality Menu. 6. Access to the subject site will be from Military Road South via a 30-foot-wide driveway. An eight -foot -wide sidewalk in front of the property on the east side constructed of the frontage road will be 7. The proposed development has been designed to provide optimal placement of parking and building improvements. The 70 parking stalls for the 17,017 square -foot building are all on site. Parking requirements were addressed through a "Peak Parking Demand Analysis" prepared by Mark Jacobs of Jake Traffic Engineering Inc. The report concludes that the 70 proposed Parking stalls adequately serve 13,500 square feet of retail/office use and a 3,500 square -foot pub/tavern. This approval is based upon the acknowledgement that any use outside of the retail/office use approved for the 13,500 square feet portion of the building that increases the parking stall to gross floor area ratio will be reviewed on a case -by -case basis through a parking study prepared by a traffic engineer. An internal two-way drive aisle is proposed to service the site and connect to Military Road South. Parking lot landscaping, in accordance to Chapter 19.125 FWRC "Outdoors, Yards, and Landscaping," will be incorporated throughout the parking lot area. 8. Under FWRC 19.215.010, Retail uses located in the CE zoning district have a zero -foot setback from the front property line, 10-foot setback from the side and rear property line. The site plan shows that these setback requirements, as well as setbacks from ingress/egress, drainage, and utility easements, are met. 9. Landscape plans prepared by David Lowman of Eagle Design date stamped October 21, 2009, depict required width of perimeter landscape areas pursuant to FWRC 19.125.060(5), BN zoning. Specifically, five feet of Type III landscaping shall be provided along the entire perimeter property lines, except for the rear property line, which abuts an RM2400 zone that requires a 15-foot-wide type I buffer. A total of 1,540 square feet of interior parking lot landscaping is required for the 70 parking stalls. The site plan contains 1,540 square feet of Type IV interior parking lot landscaping, satisfying code requirement of 22 square feet of parking lot landscaping per stall. Final landscape plans will be reviewed with construction permits to ensure compliance with the FWRC. 10. Site and architectural design is consistent with Chapter 19.115 FWRC "Community Design Guidelines," based on provision of the following key design elements: a. The new office building will be oriented to the Military Road South right-of-way, and features canopies and the intermingling of various architectural materials to visually articulate the main entry to the building. b. Decorative cornices and varying roof levels will be used along the roof line to avoid the appearance of a flat roof. c. Building C's western fagade, which is longer than 60 feet and visible from the right-of- way, contains code required fagade treatment methods of fagade modulation, a pedestrian oriented 200 square -foot plaza, and canopied entries. d. An internal stamped and colored concrete walkway will be required to provide a pedestrian route of travel from the main entrances to the Military Road South right-of- way frontage. Additionally, a pedestrian sidewalk connects the northern and southern parking I& e. The application demonstrates overall continuity of architectural design while implementing current design standards. 11. The applicant submitted a Concurrency application that has been reviewed by Public Works Traf. [fir.staff. The staff report of the Concurrency analysis identifies required mitigation measures for Process III Project flPproval, addresses any failures of the City's Level of Service (LOS) standard, and provides for the collection of pro-rata share mitigation towards the City's Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects impacted by the proposed development. The final staff evaluation for the Concurreacy application, Federal Way File #09-104437-CN, is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. The coneurrency analysis concluded the development will impact the following TIP projects: Page 2 Steel Lake Plaza File #09-102979-00-Up/D t D. 52859 Findings for Project Approval Or 139 7 S 320th St @ 20th Ave S Add 2nd left -turn lanes EB, WB $3,235 159 9 SR 99 HOV Lanes Phase 4: Add HOV lanes, install raised median $6,820 SR 509 - S 312th St 173 10 SR 99 @ S 312th St Add 2nd left -turn lane NB $15,297 SW 312 St: 14 Ave SW — Widen to 3 lanes with bike lanes, sidewalks, $2,120 142 13 SR 509 illumination, new signal at 14`� Ave SW 154 13 S 304th St @ 28th Ave S Add NB right -tun lane, signal $29,206 166 16 Military Rd S: S Star Lake Widen to 5 lanes, sidewalks, street lights $118,226 Rd - S 288th St 161 18 S 312th St @ 28th Ave S Add SB right -turn lane $7,769 Total Pro-rata Contribution $182,672 Applicant may construct these improvements, or prior to the issuance of any building permit pay a pro-rata share contribution in the amount of $182,672 toward the impacted TIP projects. 12. The proposed site plan application and application attachments have been determined to be consistent with the FWCP, with all applicable provisions of the FWRC, and with the public health, safety, and welfare. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal, and the proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. The proposed development is consistent with Process III, Project Approval, decisional criteria required under FWRC 19.65.100. The proposed site plan and application attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the FWCP, pertinent zoning regulations, and all other applicable City regulations. Final construction drawings will be reviewed for compliance with specific regulations, conditions of approval, and other applicable City requirements. This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: David Lee, Associate Planner Steel Lake Plaza Findings for Project Approval Date: February 15, 2010 Page 3 File #09-102979-00-Up/m-. I.D. 52858 CITY OF . Federal Way October 6, 2009 David Thorstad 406 South 289' Street Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: File #09-102979-00-UP; STEEL LAKE PLAzA 29020 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Thorstad: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RESU8m1 i f E_D O C T 2 Z 2009 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. On August 4, 2009, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services received your Use Process III, SEPA, and BLA application to construct a 17,017 square -foot commercial retail facility with associated site improvements. On August 27, 2009, the City issued a letter deeming your project "complete." A 120-day time -line for reviewing the project has started as of that date. The City has 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. As you are aware, the 120-day time -line may be stopped if the City determines that additional information is required to meet the requirements of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), as discussed below. Having met the submittal requirements, pursuant to the FWRC, a Notice of Application (NOA) was published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 2, 2009. PRELEvmARY REvlEw A preliminary review of your Land Use Process -III, SEPA Checklist, and BLA has been completed. Please see the following comments from each department regarding your project. Planning, David Lee (253=835-2622, david.lee@cityoffederalway.com) , 1. Please verify the square footages of tenant spaces that are for retail/office, fast food, and restaurant uses to the extent known. Fast food or restaurant required parking are calculated at a higher rate than reta:illoffi= Retail/offs, space is-ealcu ated;:at 1:(stadl :3(}Ci:Square feet,: utfoodis-Galett ued.,at 1:80 square feet, and restaurant uses are calculated at 1:100 square feet. As submitted, the plans show 17,017 square feet of retail space; 57 parking spaces are required 70 parking stalls are provided for on the current plan. At this configuration, 1300.square feet of restaurant use could be accommodated. -47t--4 rkI77V7i fi/.1 MIHMt7 A>> +�-►`�'�7 � "• 2. If it is intended to use the area directly in front of `'Building B" as a pedestrian plaza to count towards building fagade modulation as required by FWRC 19.155.060, please add more outdoor furniture, fixtures, trellises, arbors, raised planters, benches and other forms of seating, trash receptacles, and/or pedestrian friendly features. H L7 r�,&7A, 1,"7 3. Please specify the materials used to construct the trash enclosure as dep eted on the elevation plans. 4. Please show on the architectural elevation plan where the ceiling is located. Are rooftop wells proposed to be used for the placement of rooftop mechanical equipment?� 5. Please identify the material used for the sidewalks. ,ot• 1 Mr. Thorstad October 6, 2009 Page 2 FW Police Department, Kelly Crouch (253-835-6710, kelly.crouch@cityoffederalway.com) 1. As it appears there are 15 smallbusinesses being leased out; this could promote or assist in people loitering: and increase calls for service for the police department. 2. The pedestrian walk -way should be clearly visible (low, well -maintained vegetation) from all sides in order for citizens and officers to have the ability to notice any illegal activity that may occur. This will assist in preventing the complex from attracting a criminal element and increase the business owner's ability to assist in protecting their businesses. 3. The walkways between buildings should be blocked by fencing at some point (whether in the front or back) in order to create a barrier and not an easy escape route should crime occur. Z--1 aw/ �f �a 4. Is there going to be an alleyway behind the businesses for deliveries? -If so, there should b6 Femin or some barrier between properties in order to prevent unwanted traffic back and forth. 5. I would suggest adding an anti -graffiti paint to the outside -of the building (especially in the back) as this would be con-,idered a location -where graffiti would be Iikely to gigcgn - . 6. As there is another business located. at 2201 South 312,h named Steel.Lake Plaza there is the possibility of confusion on the part of emergency services. Development Services, Ann Dower (253-835-2732, ann.dower@cityoffederalway.com) Plans 1. Tapers are required at..both:ends:af.the pavement widening. Taper length shall be speed limit (mph): l (WSDOT standards; e.g: 40 mph = 40:1). 2. Show conceptual street light .locations on the plan view. Spacing would be a maximum of 175' TIR 1. Please provide a description:ofthe condition of each element of the downstream: system and describe existing.and predictedprobleins. Describe the "downstream natural drainage location" (is it a wetland, a ditch, etc.?):in greater detail and explain where it ultimately discharges. 2. Explain the small pothole aitdpipes shown on the east side of the site. Where do these drain from and to, and what will hapgen to .that runoff when the site is developed? BLA 1. Provide lot closure calculations. 2. Show existing and proposed lot areas. -3. Aii:d_oeatable-eas-ementt-rt ust re�shGv�t,,_A111r n-loca kZle asement-nrust:.be meted en the-B oundwy Line Adjustment map. 4. Please note that any easements located within the property to be dedicated as part of the project must be relinquished. The applicant is responsible for obtaining relinquishments and is advised to begin this process as soon as possible. PW Traffic, Soma Chattopadhyay (253-835-2745, s.oma.chattopadhyay@cityoffederalway.com) SEPA Please modify environmental element Transportation ('1-4f). Peak volumes would occur. between 4 PM to 6 PM. Project will generate 61 PM peak hour trips considering 20% internal capture credit. 09-102979 Doc.I.D 51600 AkCITY OF Federal Way October 6, 2009 David Thorstad 406 South 289' Street Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: File #09-102979-00-UP; STEEL LAKE PLAZA 29020 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Thorstad: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com On August 4, 2009, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services received your Use Process III, SEPA, and BLA application to construct a 17,017 square -foot commercial retail facility with associated site improvements. On August 27, 2009, the City issued a letter deeming your project "complete.'' A 120-day time -line for reviewing the project has started as of that date. The City has 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. As you are aware, the 120-day time -line may be stopped if the City determines that additional information is required to meet the requirements of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), as discussed below. Having met the submittal requirements, pursuant to the FWRC, a Notice of Application (NOA) was published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 2, 2009. PRELmNARY REvIEw A preliminary review of your Land Use Process III, SEPA Checklist, and BLA has been completed. Please see the following comments from each department regarding your project. Planning, David Lee (253-835-2622, david.lee@cityoffederalway.com) 1. Please verify the square footages of tenant spaces that are for retail/office, fast food, and restaurant uses to the extent known. Fast food or restaurant required parking are calculated at a higher rate than retail/office. Retail/office space is calculated at 1 (stall):300 square feet, fast food is calculated at 1:80 square feet, and restaurant uses are calculated at 1:100 square feet. As submitted, the plans show 17,017 square feet of retail space; 57 parking spaces are required. 70 parking stalls are provided for on the current plan. At this configuration, 1300 square feet of restaurant use could be accommodated. 2. If it is intended to use the area directly in front of `Building B" as a pedestrian plaza to count towards building fagade modulation as required by FWRC 19.155.060, please add more outdoor furniture, fixtures, trellises, arbors, raised planters, benches and other forms of seating, trash receptacles, and/or pedestrian friendly features. 3. Please specify the materials used to construct the trash enclosure as depicted on the elevation plans. 4. Please show on the architectural elevation plan where the ceiling is located. Are rooftop wells proposed to be used for the placement of rooftop mechanical equipment? 5. Please identify the material used for the sidewalks. Mr. Thorstad October 6, 2009 Page 2 FW Police Department, Kelly Crouch (253-835-6710, kelly.crouch@cityoffederalway.com) 1. As it appears there are 15 small businesses being leased out, this could promote or assist in people loitering and increase calls for service for the police department. 2. The pedestrian walk -way should be clearly visible (low, well -maintained vegetation) from all sides in order for citizens and officers to have the ability to notice any illegal activity that may occur. This will assist in preventing the complex from attracting a criminal element and increase the business owner's ability to assist in protecting their businesses. 3. The walkways between buildings should be blocked by fencing at some point (whether in the front or back) in order to create a barrier and not an easy escape route should crime occur. 4. Is there going to be an alleyway behind the businesses for deliveries? If so, there should be fencing or some barrier between properties in order to prevent unwanted traffic back and forth. 5. 1 would suggest adding an anti -graffiti paint to the outside of the building (especially in the back) as this would be considered a location where graffiti would be likely to occur. 6. As there is another business located at 2201 South 312`h named Steel Lake Plaza there is the possibility of confusion on the part of emergency services. Development Services, Ann Dower (253-835-2732, ann.dower@cityoffederalway.com) Plans 1. Tapers are required at both ends of the pavement widening. Taper length shall be speed limit (mph): 1 (WSDOT standards; e.g. 40 mph = 40:1). 2. Show conceptual street light locations on the plan view. Spacing would be a maximum of 175'. TIR 1. Please provide a description of the condition of each element of the downstream system and describe existing and predicted problems. Describe the "downstream natural drainage location" (is it a wetland, a ditch, etc.?) in greater detail and explain where it ultimately discharges. 2. Explain the small pothole and pipes shown on the east side of the site. Where do these drain from and to, and what will happen to that runoff when the site is developed? BLA 1. Provide lot closure calculations. 2. Show existing and proposed lot areas. 3. All locatable easements must be shown. All non -locatable easements must be noted on the Boundary Line Adjustment map. 4. Please note that any easements located within the property to be dedicated as part of the project must be relinquished. The applicant is responsible for obtaining relinquishments and is advised to begin this process as soon as possible. PW Traffic, Soma Chattopadhyay (253-835-2745, soma.chattopadhyay@cityoffederalway.com) SEPA Please modify environmental element Transportation (14f). Peak volumes would occur between 4 PM to 6 PM. Project will generate 61 PM peak hour trips considering 20% internal capture credit. 09-102979 Doc.1.D 51600 Mr. Thorstad October 6, 2009 Page 3 CANCELLATION Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you should have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please feel free to call me at 253-835-2622 or e-mail at david lee@cityoffederalway.com Sincerely, r �Lee Associate Planner enc: Resubrrl*.ttal Form c7 Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sonia Chattopadhyay, Traffic Analyst Kelly Crouch, Police Department 09-102979 Doc -I D 51600 Federal way STEEL LAKE PLAZA "q PEAK PARKING DEMAND ANAL August S, 2009AM Higs Opp �� Ii i1111111A1�-= JTE . Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. Mark I Jacobs, PE, PTCE, President 77318t1,Ave SW - Seattle, WA 98106 - 2007 Tel. 206.762.1978 - Cell 206.799.5692 E-mail aaketraffic@camcast.net JTE . Jake Traffic En eneerin Inc . � �RESUBMITTED Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE 0 C T 2 1 2009 President 7731 8th Ave SW — Seattle, WA 98106 — 2007 CITY OF FEDERAL Tel. 206.762.1978 - Cell 206.799.5692 BUILDING ❑EPfI E-mail jaketraffic@comcastnet August 3, 2009 Mr. Rico Galliano STEEL LAKE PLAZA PO Box 3437 Renton, WA 98056 Re: Steel Lake Plaza - Federal Way Peak Parking Demand Analysis Dear Mr. Galliano; We have prepared this Peak Parking Demand Analysis for the proposed Steel Lake Plaza project in Federal Way. The project proposes to provide the following: ➢ 13,500 total sf of specialty retail ➢ 3,500 sf restaurant with bar (Pub/Tavern) The proposed project is located east of Military Rd. S. and south of S. 288th Street. Access to the site will be via a driveway on Military Road South. Briefly, the format of this report provides a description of the proposed project, discusses the existence of Public Transportation in the site vicinity, the trip generation of the proposed facilities and the detailed Peak Parking Demand Analysis per City requirements and iTE data. The summary, conclusions and recommendations begin on page five of this report. PROJECT INFORMATION Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the proposed site and surrounding street network. Figure 2 shows an aerial image of the project site obtained from the King County IMAP, Figure 3 shows a preliminary site plan prepared by Contour Engineering, PLLC, The plan has three buildings providing 13,500 sf of specialty retail and 3,500 sf of restaurant with bar. The site plan also shows 69 parking stalls including four handicapped and internal circulation. Access to the site will be via Military Road South, Full development and occupancy of the proposed Steel Lake Plaza project is anticipated to occur by 2010/11. presuming the permits are issued in a timely manner. EepC•ire:]a �. ,-P: i,;.c�..�rr13C:9 C.B '.reel la.e rie;e:a n:np :.Lcal to e�aaa i.rci,,� .:,p�i,r::f �elr e, a Slee ,e.er le:aoe�..re a COLOR COPY ONLY JTE, Inc. Mr. Rico Galliano STEEL LAKE PLAZA August 3, 2009 Page -2- EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Proiect Site The site is presently undeveloped. The northern parcel has an old foundation for a single family home that would be removed to make way for the proposed development. Transit Service Metro Transit routes 183 provide service along within the site vicinity along S. 288th St. and Military Rd. South, Additional information on this route can be obtained online at b—ttPZ/transit.metrokc. ov. PARKING IMPACT ANALYSIS Ci f Fe er I Wa The City of Federal Way Municipal Code Section 19.130.120 Shared Facilities of the Federal Way Municipal Code identifies the following; (a) The applicant must submit a parking demand study, prepared by a professional traffic engineer, demonstrating that the peak hours of parking demand for the businesses or uses which propose to share parking will not substantially conflict. The proposed project proposes to provide both retail and a restaurant with a bar and lounge land uses that would share parking. The peak parking time periods for these two land uses are different that provides an opportunity for shared parking. This letter details this. Parking requirements are governed by the City of Federal Way Municipal Code Sections Chapters 19.195 through 19,24C that identify the number of parking stalls required by land use. The required number of parking spaces for the General and Specialty Retail section of the project is 45 parking spaces (1 space/300 sf; 13,500 sf/ 300 sf) and for the restaurant with bar is 35 (1 space/100 sf) parking spaces which equates to a total of 80 peak parking spaces per the City of Federal Way Municipal Code, City definition and criteria 19.240.070 Retail, general and specialty - Manufacturing and production, limited. General and specialty retail - as defined in this title, which include, but are not necessarily limited to, products such as groceries, produce, and related items; drugs and personal care products; books; liquor, • hardware, nursery or agricultural stock and related Items; household goods; clothing; variety; home electronics; sporting goods; signs; secondhand merchandise; antiques; and works of art. Retail services including laundry, dry cleaning, beauty and barber, video rental, shoe repair, printing and duplicating. '��i-d�-eer)elal-: a�eci Fr ee��a90:N Steer ln4r Re:e yerl�ng Siee�:aFe Rail ,r,��or,r Enpno<�e Fraorar.a �:'re.�,ol-='a:a�o'4rngdlc COLOR COPY ONLY JTE, Inc. Mr. Rico Galliano STEEL LAKE PLAZA August 3, 2009 Page -3- The aforementioned retail uses require 1 space per 300 sf. City criteria 19.240.080 Office uses: Medical and dental offices; banking, financial, real estate, insurance, and other professional offices require 1 space per 225 sf. City criteria 19.240.110 Entertainment - Generally Restaurant or Tavern 1 space per 100 sf Fast Food Restaurant 1 space per 80 sf Time of Peak: The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parkin Generation identifies the time of the peak period and percentage of the peak period. The peak period and percentage of peak period for a Shopping Center land use is identified at 1200 - 1300 hours with a percentage peak of 100 percent during the weekday and between 1200 - 1300 hours with a percentage peak of 100 percent during the weekend. The percentage of peak parking during the Restaurant with bar and lounge peak time is 70 percent during the weekday and 73 percent during the weekend. The High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant land use with bar and lounge (Pub/Tavern) has a peak time of 1800 - 1900 with a percentage peak of 100% during the weekday and 1800 - 2000 with a percentage peak of 100% during the weekend. The percentage of peak parking during the Shopping Center peak time is 50 percent during the weekday and 36 percent during the weekend. Peak Pnrking Burin Peak Period We have calculated the peak parking for both the Shopping Center and Restaurant with bar and lounge peak parking periods using the parking required by the City and the percent peak parking during the peak time as identified by the Par in Generation. Weekday (Shopping Center Peak): ➢ Shopping Center: 45 required City parking x 100% peak parking = 45 parking spaces ➢ Restaurant: 35 required City parking x 5C)% = 17.5 parking spaces ➢ Total parking spaces during the peak parking of shopping center (1200 - 1300) = 63 parking spaces Weekday (Restaurant Peak): ➢ Shopping Center: 45 required City parking x 70% peak parking = 31.5 parking ➢ Restaurant: 35 required -City parking x 100% = 35 parking spaces spaces %,"'nerrz.\a' o'e — _`i..""":.'.x 8 -!.. La R. C ,m E., re.. F; Ca....Ylste.Aa'.w. N.'i" Qa COLOR COPY ONLY JTE, Inc. Mr. Rico Galliano STEEL LAKE PLAZA August 3, 2009 Page -4- Total parking spaces during the peak parking of restaurant (1800 - 1900) = 67 parking spaces Weekend (Shopping Center Peak): y Shopping Center: 45 required City parking x 100% peak parking = 45 parking spaces Restaurant: 35 required City parking x 36% = 12.6 parking spaces Total parking spaces during the peak parking of shopping center (1200 - 1300) = 58 parking spaces Weekend (Restaurant Peak): i Shopping Center: 45 required City parking x 73% peak parking = 32.9 parking spaces Restaurant: 35 required City parking x 100% = 35 parking spaces Total parking spaces during the peak parking of restaurant (1800 - 1900) = 68 parking spaces Pe k Parkin Demand Summa A peak parking demand was conducted to identify peak parking during the peak time for both land uses and identify that the peak parking would not conflict with the proposed land uses. The peak parking required by the City based on the proposed uses was calculated at 80 parking spaces. The proposed project is projected to provide 69 parking stalls. Using the City required parking and the percentage of peak perking during the peak time of each land use we have calculated the peak parking during the! weekday and weekend for both the Shopping Center and Restaurant land uses. During the weekday the peak parking during the Shopping Center land use was calculated at 63 parking spaces and 67 parking spaces for the Restaurant peak. The weekend peak parking for the Shopping Center land use was calculated at 58 parking spaces and 68 parking spaces for the Restaurant peak. The worst case scenario (weekend Restaurant peak) yielded 68 parking spaces. The proposed project provides 69 parking spaces which is enough parking spaces to accommodate the peak parking demand for all scenarios. Thus the proposed number of parking spaces should be allowed and approved by the City. In addition ITE data was used to identify the time of peak for each land use during the weekday and weekend. Based on the data the peak times of the Shopping Center would not conflict with the peak time of the Restaurant. Attached in the appendix is a table that shows the weekday and weekend peak parking demand. JTE, Inc. Mr. Rico Galliano STEEL LAKE PLAZA August 3, 2009 Page -5- SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report analyzed the Peak Parking ❑errand for the proposed Steel Lake Plata project. The parking requirements are governed by City Code which requires 80 parking spaces for the proposed project. A peak parking analysis was done using the required City parking and the percentage of peak parking during the time of peak for each land use as derived in the ITE Parkin Generation. We used the City parking requirement data and ITE data for time of peak parking demand to calculate the peak parking during the weekday and weekend for the peak period of the Retail and Restaurant with bar and lounge land uses. The peak period for the Retail and Restaurant with bar and lounge (Pub/Tavern) land uses occur at different times thus enabling shared parking. Our analysis Indicates the highest parking demand scenario is the weekend Restaurant with bar and lounge peak which was calculated to have a peak parking of 68 vehicles (the weekday and weekend Retail peak required less parking spaces during the peak time). The proposed project is projected to provide 69 parking stalls that are ample to accommodate the peak parking for the proposed project. Thus the City should approve the proposed 69 parking spaces. Please contact me at (206) 762-1978 or email me at iaketrafficfcomcast.ne if you have any questions. MJ 431 2 6 I C} Sincerely, Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE, President -7/o 1� •[rp ree}a [.- -,e7 sa�mo. t::Y si.. �a.e eta .e �.r�p Sleel Le•e cae�cu- urn-g,,,,.,, r�,r ai '.:te .eN.:ec�,,,,,u�- �aCOLOR COPY ONLY Project: Steel Lake Plaza - Federal Way Location: East of Military Rd. and south of S. 288th Street NORTH L q" 1Sart1 ti'a�1hr>r Ltanrt ; s:.r ; �a ¢ Y .15 � Wpodmnrrt .. j" .5 X6 rA S! 7 BC65r1 . 1.5 Emt a 147 IIi0i1SP5 2T :7Iw Love [ 5 177!11 57 3 N Project Site S LrlKearll $ ' S 28mi S ' • V te I r u, 8' i .: 371n. S1 N" Z. C 'YS S a'c'"R!h 5Sh R IIE OWN e�: •;� j s Mtn 7. Lek4ld ,gr .. _ t. St s � Orr GA• a S Ei�Hal1 = i1r�• ZI S�.vw�L•�I L7$ 0. M .. ry .4 o y SW 3f7fh S 313h SY :• w MieSr: N 7Sh T a .1 4,1.E pFed" t- c Y r PaSrit SI cParM �gW .. '- s_.�. {5311i19 ,,`...4_ SE -1 as ri+ � N � Y xsw 33 151 .'" fenrnr �: i•i1dM - 7acama srr 3w,sn a R ..R wn - Cr •5; rJ' f�:•r„nor Ln 4 1;R�19 � Auburn KrttsCarer . - E•-�a1 Ci11ru„r [ 15Vr S SW 151h U 9a'r r,lur.:.:c ^::;h;AIDans JTES I FIGURE 1 Reprint In Color Only STEEL LAKE PLAZA - FEDERAL WAY PEAK PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS VICINITY MAP r` Project: Steel Lake Plaza - Federal Way Location: East of Military Rd. and south of S. 288th Street• Ei Note: image obtained from King County IMAP STEEL LAKE PLAZA - FEDERAL WAY FIGURE 2 1 PEAK PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS Reprint In Cnla. dilly AERIAL IMAGE NORTH Project: Steel Lake Plaza - Federal Way Location: East of Military Rd. and south of S. 288th Street iJiJi+Avf • lrJfJJ� , eve ;�....•..: re M l ce i Note: an 8.5 x 11" preliminary site plan is included with this report STEEL LAKE PLAZA - FEDERAL WAY JTE, Inc. PEAK PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS FIGURE 3 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN �r NORTH orno0om �.14 rq O Y m a Y l0 N a ol o c 0 � O O r O0 00 M Y 01 � O c. CN Y 00,000 W 0 0 0 0 0 a momr- �l 00800 E N M NN 00 O 0 Y a� rn rn o 0 0,0 �"n000'00 z Y � a a Q U a J O N qt N �i N M M e-I O tz O O M ~ m U J w H O O O O 101^ Y/ ,0 L 0 w m N N_ co N O L m C w3LL LL J _ s N ai �aacao c 0 N coo co Ul c a� s m 3 O an N a> U 0 c f6 s c m m L 0 W co w ir- U N O_ to O z 0 z D rn 0 0 0 0 1ti 00 c4cmo00-� to O c Y m l0 � a Y lC N a 0 OR -OR OR w O O M LO O c O � O 0 N e-1 O a N Y O m O a0) x 0 0 0 O O M 0 0 0 0 0 a motor- H E 000010 N e-I M e-I N e-I 00 e-I r-I p x ML0000 0 3 ItC'')00000 � Z c IX Y a Y U a O N N r-1 m M N m M r1 O a 00 rn rn am r• 0 J w H 0 0 0 0 0 O lii In D M Ic'1 LL e-I m N_ fn N L co C J 3 1wi _ • Y lv N N N (0 o o m o 0 oco0oOF ui CN O O O LO c O Y � W � a ' Y !0 a o 0 OR 0 0 cO oi°o rr-rM- M a `i Y 01 ro 0 aC14 o N 00000 t1 N ,6 1 em1 as 0 a� 8 8 N c C e-I e-I rl 7 N lA rn 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 00 C9 � Z Y e a a 4, Y a U J O m RT N TI N m M TA O LLI 00 rn m rn r- � v J 000000, LO lLO rL cvi M M N_ M N M m v � C s � Cr m a: m D OOOOO co D o 0 0 m m c 0 Y 0 N N a Y a 0 0 o 0o mo'too c 0 i- O r— �q rn IH a� Y 0 N a 00 3� Y 000 l0 d M N m 4 000Oo O O E COV 000 N ci rl rl LO o 0 0 0 LO m O O O 00 N to CO c Z Y a a � U a m O M N rl N cm cn rl O a 0o M 01 rn r- U J W H 000000 O O rn rn O CY) M co N_ co y O � C 3 U- _ Y N U I.N 1'� C w rr rr m O G) Land Use: 820 Shopping Center The following tables present the time -of -day distributions for parking demand. ❑ecerrl her Mon Thursday Friday 5a#urgi� _ Hour Beginning i Percent of Peak Period Number of Data Points" Percent of Peak Period Number of Data Points" Percent of Peak Period !Number of Data Ports' 12:00-4:00 a.m. - 0 - 0 - 0 5:00 a.m. - 0 - 0 - 0 6:00 a.m. - 0 - 0 - 0 7:00 a.m. 9 1 - 0 - 0 8:00 a.m. 16 1 55 1 - 0 9:00 a.m. 62 1 4 76 3 .- 0 10:00 a.m. 64 5 77 6 78 10 11:00 a.m. 91 7 92 6 94 10 12:00 p.m. 87 5 100 6 100 10 1:00 P.M. 84 9 100 6 93 10 2:00 p.m. 100 9 90 6 95 10 3:00 p.m. 95 10 88 6 94 10 4:00 p.m. 85 7 87 6 87 10 5:00 P.M. 91 8 87 6 81 10 6:00 p.m. 96 6 85 6 69 10 7:00 p.m. 95 6 84 6 - 0 8:00 p.m. - 0 87 4 - 0 9:00 P.M. - 0 -- 0 - 0 10:00 P.M. - 0 0 - 0 11:00 P.M. - 0 - 0 - 0 'Subset of database hrnn_noromhor - Monday-Tniufsday ►ter Percent of Number of Percent of KuMbif Peak Data Peak of Data Period Points' Period Poir;its' Hour Beginning Percent of Number of Peak Data Period Points' 12:00-4:00 a.m. - 0 - 0 - 0 5:00 a.m. - 0 - 0 - 0 6:00 a.m. - 0 - 0 - 0 7:00 a.m. 5 1 - 0 13 1 8:00 a.m. 18 2 0 27 2 9:00 a.m. 38 3 - 0 61 3 10:00 a.m. 53 3 59 5 75 6 11:00 a.m. 4 74 6 7 12:00 p.m. tr 100 j 4 94 7 110 7 1:00P.M. 4 85 8 7 2:00 p.m. 91 4 74 8 98 7 3:00 p.m. 86 4 68 8 88 6 4:00 p.m. 81 4 67 8 68 5 5:00 p.m. 3 70 7 4 6:00 p.m. 69 3 76 7 73 2 7:00 p.m. 2 100 3 1 8:00 p.m. 70 2 91 3 53 1 _ 9:00 P.M. 42 2 - 0 44 1 10:00 P.M. 10 1 - 0 29 1 11:00 p.m. - 0 - 0 - 0 Subset of database 0 Institute of Transportation Engineers -1-1 Parking Generation, 3rd Edition Land Use: 932 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurc, The following tables Present the tine -of -day distribution of the variation in Parking demand during the course of the day was available for weekdays. The data represents a combination study sites. of urban and rural -asr�d on ireohicfes weekday at a T,G+pO aq, It GFA Restairriant Weekday at a Restaurant Hour Beginning _F$rrrU Percent of Number of r� Bar arLoa 12:00-4:00 a.m. Peak Period Data Points' _ Percent of Number of I Peak Period Data Points' 5:00 a-m. 0 - 0 6.--00 a-m. 0 24 4 - 0 7:00 a.m. 42 5 - 0 8.00 a.m. 54 8 - 0 9:00 a.m. �3 9 - 0 10:00 a.m. 81 6 1 11:00 a.m. 9 100 14 8 1 12:00 .m, 100 33 26 7 1,00 -m. 2:00 100 23 50 7 .m. 3:00 .m. 51 12 40 7 31 1 4: 00 . m. 11 40 12 22 1 5:00 .m. 6:00 79 13 25 1 ,m. 7:00 .m. 13 62 100 ' 0 8:00 .m. 11 63 11 00 17 9:00 .m. 60 7 80 11 10:00 ,m, Z 46 5 58 7 11:00 ,m, * 4 2 2 - D Subset of database - 0 eared on Veh►cies --- saturday at a p�trI.00 sq. R GFA Farm Restaurant rd ay at a Restaurant MOUh Beginning Percent of Number with with Bar or Lou 12;00-4;00 a.m, of Peak Period DataPoints' Percent of Number of Peak Period Data Points' 5:00 a, m. _ 0 - 0 6:00 a.m. _ 0 15 4 - 0 7:00 a.m. 23 5 - 0 8:00 a. M. 39 7 - 0 9:00 a.m. 56 9 - 0 10:00 a.m. 100 10 4 1 11;00 a.m. 100 10 6 1 12:00 .rn. 1:00 100 12 1 36 .m. 2:00 .m. 100 11 53 1 1 3:00 . rn.. 4:00 12 29 10 41 34 -m. 5:00 . m, 36 42 11 1 55 1 6:00 .m. 7:00 _m.. 12 10D 100 2 10D 2 - 8:00 .m. 9:00 .m. 13 42 11 4 100 5 10:00 . M. 29 9 30 29 1 11:00 .m, ' 8 40 3 8 1 Subset of database -0 InstRute of 71ansportation Engineers 268 s� Parking Generation, 3rd Edition Aj ;W - Federal way STEEL LAKE PLAZA NERATION AND PASS —BY RATE September 22, 2$009 AM 7 a _.., .___...._ __..... elm ■ooiirIN - li"Anssoon■■■■■■ .._......._ JTE . Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE, President 2614 390 Ave SW - Seattle, WA 98116 - 2503 Tel. 206.762.1978 - Cell 206.799.5692 E-mail iaketraffic�ftomcast.net JTE . Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc.. OCT 2 1 znn91w V+dAY Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE C17y aF FEDERA BUILDING OF --PT. President 2614 39th Ave. SW- Seattle, WA 98116 - 2007 Tel. 206.762.1978 - Cell 206.799.5692 E-mail iaketrafic(pcomcastnet September 22, 2009 Mr. Rico Galliano STEEL LAKE PLAZA PO Box 3437 Renton, WA 98056 Re: Steel Lake Plaza - Federal Way Trip Generation and Pass -by Traffic Analysis Dear Mr. Galliano; I have reviewed the City of Federal Way's Trip Generation for the proposed Steel Lake Plaza project in Federal Way. The project proposes to provide the following: ➢ 13,500 total sf of specialty retail ➢ 3,500 sf restaurant with bar (Pub/Tavern) The proposed project is located east of Military Rd. S. and south of S. 288th Street. Access to the site will be via a driveway on Military Road South. The City's Trip Generation for the site was provided via e-mail on September 3, 2009 and is as follows: Thanks for the email. I calculated the trip generation using ITE trip generation handbook and I have considered 13,586 square feet as Specialty Retail (land use code 814) which is generating 37 trips and 3431 square feet as Drinking Place (land use code 925) which is generating 39 trips. Project is generating total 76 trips. According to ITE there is no pass by for these land uses. Please let me know if I should contact your Traffic engineer Mark Jacob to know what he thinks. Thank you. Soma Chattopodhyay City of Federal Way Traffic Engineer Phone: 253-835-2745 My review of the City's trip generation shows that the City's calculation of total site generated PM peak hour trips as correct. However, the two proposed uses of retailing and restaurant/pub are conducive to pass -by traffic. \�nryn.w].\c\-Rgect fllef\3009019 Sieei l�Fe Aa/. f'0/hin( Sleel l�M Pl..e fen[aur Enp�n../.-FMerel waYl3te.lUle%ueO.,,B,inp. het COLOR COPY ONLY Mr. Rico Galliano STEEL LAKE PLAZA September 22, 2009 Page -2- I have reviewed the ITE data and other local Agency literature regarding pass -by rates. The two land uses being evaluated are Specialty Retail that is retail use and Pub/Restaurant that is a restaurant service use. The following table lists the pass -by rates from the ITE and local agencies: Source ITE Snohomish County Olympia Sumner Des Moines Pierce County Specialty Pub/ Retail Restaurant I Comment 34% 25% 25% 34% 45% 20% 44/43% 1 per closest LUC; shopping center and 20% miscellaneous retail/restaurant (Fehr & 45% cuality restaurant (Transpo) turnover restaurant 45% restaurant (Fehr & Peers) 40/45% quality/high turnover restaurant (Mirai (Fehr & Fife 20% 20% drinking place (DEA) Bellingham 25% 44% drinking place The supporting documentation for the values depicted in the above table is attached in the appendix. Specialty Retailing is a retailing activity; thus a 34% pass -by rate that is associated with Shopping Center is a value that could be used per ITE data. The typical value used in this area is 25% that I have used routinely in traffic studies for years. No review Agency to my knowledge has objected to the 25% pass -by rate value. This rate is slightly lower than the average pass -by rate of 29% noted in the table above. I believe that a 25% pass -by rate for Specialty Retail is appropriate and reasonable. The Pub/Drinking Place is very similar to a Quality and High Turnover (Sit -Down) restaurants; and in fact exhibit similar PM peak hour trip generation rates. The ITE data identifies a Quality and High Turnover (Sit Down) Restaurants as having a 44% and 43% pass -by rates, respectively. Many Quality and High Turnover (Sit -Down) restaurants have bars; thus the pass -by rate associated with these very similar land uses should be applicable. I can name numerous Quality restaurants that have bars such as Salty's and Dukes for example. The average pass -by rate used in this region is 37%. My initial proposed pass -by rate for the Pub was 43% based on ITE data for a High Turnover (Sit -Down) restaurant that I believe to be reasonable. However, based on added research I would propose that a 35% pass -by rate be used that is slightly lower than the average rate used in the region that ensures a conservative analysis. The City's PM peak hour trip generation for the two uses Specialty Retail and Pub is 37 and 39 PM peak hour trips, respectively. My initial pass -by analysis identified the use of 25% and 43% pass -by rates for Specialty Retail and Pub, respectively that resulted in 50 net new PM peak hour trips (37x0.75 + 39x0.57). Merely using the average pass -by rates of 29 and 37% ��E.g�ne.q.k\-uoi.c vns�zooV me si..i W.Av. Pem s 1—A 1. moms r.lv... COLOR JTE, Inc. Mr. Rico Galliano STEEL LAKE PLAZA September 22, 2009 Page -3- shown in the above table would result in the project generating 51 PM peak hour trips (370.71 + 390.63). The resultant new site PM peak hour trips using the proposed pass -by - rates of 25 and 35% is 53 PM peak hour trips (37xO.75 + 39xO.65) that is conservative and reasonable. Another factor that could reduce the site traffic is shared traffic between the uses on the site; however to further ensure that a conservative trip generation estimate is used we have not factored this into our analysis. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report has reviewed the City's trip generation calculations and provides documentation on pass -by traffic for the two envisioned land uses; Specialty Retail and Pub. The analysis shows that both envisioned land uses would generate pass -by traffic. Conservatively I have estimated that the proposed Steel Lake Plaza project would conservatively generate 53 net new PM peak hour trips. Please contact me at 206.762.1978 or email me at j skein ific@ cprncas n_e4 if you have any questions. MJJ: mjj Sincerely. Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE, President JAKE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 1)9.Z2.2LO0 S \�Fnpne.rl.�e�-Rq.cl fnee�2009 U1B Slcel leFa R.re V.rNirq-Steel Leea Pero Canraui EnOneer.-feOerelwry�SrealL..aFl.e COLOR COPY ONLY OPYONLY Page 1 of 3 Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE From: Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE [JakeTraffic@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 8:58 PM To: 'Rico Galliano' Subject: 2009.018 - Steel lake Plaza Attachments: SteelLakePlazaPass-ByRates.pdf Rico I have reviewed the literature regarding pas -by rates. Specialty Retailing is a retailing activity; thus a 34% pass -by rate that is associated with Shopping Center is a value that could be used. The typical value used in this area is 25% that I have used. Thus the Specialty Retail component of the project would generate 28 net new PMPHT's. The Pub/Drinking Place is very similar to a High Turnover (Sit -Down) restaurant, and in fact exhibit similar PM peak hour trip generation rates. Ite data identifies a High Turnover (Sit Down) Restaurant as having a 43% pass - by rate. Thus this component of the project would generate 22 net ne PMPHT's. The combined project would thus generate 50 PMPHT's; not accounting for shared trips between the uses (such as someone shopping at one of the retail facilities and then going to get a drink and bite to eat. Contact me if you have any questions. Mark 206.799.5692 cell From: Rico Galliano [mailto:Evgalliano@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 7:24 PM To: Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE Subject: Re: Steel lake Plaza Great, thanks Mark -- Original Message ---- From: Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE To: 'Rico Galliano' Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 7:02 PM Subject: RE: Steel lake Plaza Rico Received e-mail and will get back to you Mark From: Rico Galliano [mailto:Evgalliano@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 3:44 PM To: Mark J. Jacobs, PE, PTOE Subject: Fw: Steel lake Plaza `% Here you go Mark. Also, what businesses fall under Specialty Retail and is it worth fighting for a different classification here? 9/17/2009 Page 2 of 3 Fhanks, iico --- Original Message ----- -rom: Soma Chattopadhyay ro: 'evgalliano@comcast. net Sent: Thursday. September 03, 2009 3:14 PM Subject: RE: Steel lake Plaza 3i Rico, rhanks for the email. I calculated the trip generation using ITE trip generation handbook and I have :onsidered 13,586 square feet as Specialty Retail (landuse code 814) which is generating 37 trips and 3431 square feet as Drinking Place (landuse code 925) which is generating 39 trips. Project is generating total 76 trips. According to ITE there is no pass by for these landuses. Please let me know if I should contact your Traffic engineer Mark Jacob to know what he thinks. Thank you. Soma Chattopadhyay City of Federal Way Traffic Engineer Phone: 253-835-2745 From: evgalliano@comcast.net [mailto:evgalliano@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 10:37 AM To: Soma Chattopadhyay Subject: Re: Steel lake Plaza Hi Soma, Nice talking with you over the phone a few moments ago on our Steel Lake Plaza project. As discussed, we currently don't have any company signed to a lease, nor any Letter of Intents either. So I can't tell you who will be in there and what the breakdown will be in space, because we have no one yet. There is a pub across the street that would like to rent the middle, 3500 sq. ft. building, but we don't have anything in writing that they will rent from us. To be ahead of the curve, in anticipation that they might actually lease from us, we submitted a Peak Parking Analysis because, per the per the city's parking code, we would be a little short on parking spots. This was submitted with our Master Application and it was professionally done by Jake Traffic Engineering. The contact name is Mark Jacobs at 206.762.1978. We talked with Sarady after our Pre-App meeting back in January, and we were guessing that the trip generation would be between 45-55. When we submitted our Master Application we paid for the city to perform the trip generation study via the Concurrency Report, and would still like the city to carry this out. Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks in advance, 9/17/2009 Page 3 of 3 Rico Galliano 206.229.8998 --- Original Message ----- From: "Soma Chattopadhyay" <Soma.Chattopadhyay@cityoffederalway.com> To: "evgall iano@comcast. net" <evgalliano@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2009 9:44:29 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Steel lake Plaza Hi, I am the assigned traffic engineer for your project. City has received your Concurrency application but unable to proceed. City need specific information about the commercial center to calculate trip generation. Please provide us in writing if there will be any restaurant or what kind of retail and square footage of each kind and detail description. ITE trip generation handbook will be used to calculate trip generation. Applicant has option to submit the trip generation but in that case City requirement is to have three studies of similar type landuses approved by the City. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Soma Chattopadhyay City of Federal Way Traffic Engineer Phone: 253-835-2745 c 9/17/2009 Zoe) 5.0tp Land Use: 814 Specialty Retail Center Description Specialty retail centers are generally small strip shopping centers that contain a variety of retail shops and specialize in quality apparel, hard goods and services, such as real estate offices, dance studios, florists and small restaurants. Shopping center (Land Use 820) is a related use. Additional Data The sites were surveyed between the late 1970s and the 2000s in California, Florida, Georgia, New York and Pennsylvania. Source Numbers 100, 304, 305, 367, 423, 507, 577 7 Sr,P C 2•71/0 14— C- C�) Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1386 Institute of Transportation Engineers Land Use: 925 Drinking Place Description A drinking place contains a bar where alcoholic beverages and food are sold and possibly some type of entertainment such as music, television screens, video games, or pool tables. Establishments that specialize in serving food but also have bars are not included in this land use. Additional Data The sites were surveyed in 1987, 1995 and 1997 in Colorado, Oregon and South Dakota. Source Numbers 291, 358, 583 3 ,; C( 3 I ��, C(Aj 0 d d .rff -35 Of - Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1772 Institute of Transportation Engineers Land Use: 932 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant Description This land use consists of sit-down, full -service eating establishments with turnover rates of approximately one hour or less. This type of restaurant is usually moderately priced and frequently belongs to a restaurant chain. Generally, these restaurants serve lunch and dinner; they may also be open for breakfast and are sometimes open 24 hours per day. These restaurants typically do not take reservations. Patrons commonly wait to be seated, are served by a waiter/waitress, order from menus and pay for their meal after they eat. Some facilities contained within this land use may also contain a bar area for serving food and alcoholic drinks. Quality restaurant (Land Use 931), fast-food restaurant without drive -through window (Land Use 933), fast-food restaurant with drive -through window (Land Use 934) and fast-food restaurant with drive -through window and no indoor seating (Land Use 935) are related uses. Additional Data Users should exercise caution when applying statistics during the a.m. peak periods, as the sites contained in the database for this land use may or may not be open for breakfast. In cases where it was confirmed that the sites were not open for breakfast, data for the a.m. peak hour of the adjacent street traffic were removed from the database. Vehicle occupancy ranged from 1.39 to 1.69 persons per automobile on an average weekday. The average for the sites surveyed was approximately 1.52. Five sites submitted for inclusion in this land use indicated the presence of an on -site pick-up window. From the limited data sample, it does not appear that the presence of a pick-up window had a significant impact on trip generation, The outdoor seating area is not included in the overall gross floor area. Therefore, the number of seats may be a more reliable independent variable on which to establish trip generation rates for facilities having significant outdoor seating. The sites were surveyed between the 1960s and the 2000s throughout the United States. Source Numbers 2, 4, 5, 72, 90, 100, 126, 269, 275, 280, 300, 301, 305, 338, 340, 341, 358, 384, 424, 432, 437, 438, 444, 507, 555, 577, 589, 617, 618 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1794 Institute of Transportation Engineers Land Use: 932 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant The following tables present the time -of -day distribution of the variation in parking demand during the course of the day was available for weekdays. The data represents a combination of urban and rural study sites. Based on Vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft GFA Weekday at a Famii Restaurant Weekday at a Restaurant with Bar or Lounge Hour Beginning Percent of Peak Period Number of Data Points* Percent of Peak Period Number of Data Points* 12:00-4:00 a.m. - 0 - 0 5:00 a.m. - 0 - 0 6:00 a.m. 24 4 - 0 7:00 a.m. 42 5 -- 0 8:00 a.m. 54 8 - 0 9:00 a.m. 73 9 6 1 10:00 a.m. 81 9 8 1 11:00 a.m. 100 14 26 7 12:00 p.m. 100 33 50 7 1:00 P.M. 100 23 35 7 2:00 p.m. 51 12 31 1 3:00 p.m. 40 11 22 1 4:00 p.m. 40 12 25 1 5:00 p.m. 79 13 73 6 6:00 p.m. 81 13 100 10 7:00 p.m. 62 11 100 17 8:00 p.m. 63 11 80 11 9:00 P.M. 60 7 58 7 10:00 P.M. 46 5 - 0 11:00 P.M. 42 2 - 0 ' Subset of database Based on Vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft GFA Saturday at a Family Restaurant Saturday at a Restaurant with Bar or Loun e Hour Beginning Percent of Peak Period Number of Data Points* Percent of Peak Period Number of Data Points* 12:00-4:00 a.m. �� - j 0 J - 0 5:00 a.m. - 0 1 - 0 6:00 a.m. 15 4 - 0 7:00 a.m. 23 5 - 0 8:00 a.m. 39 7 - 0 9:00 a.m. 56 9 4 1 10:00 a.m. 100 10 6 1 11:00 a.m. 100 10 17 1 12:00 p.m. 100 12 36 1 1:00 P.M. 100 11 46 1 2:00 p.m. 53 12 41 1 3:00 p.m. 29 10 34 1 4:00 2.m. 36 11 55 1 5:00 O.m. 42 11 67 2 6:00 p.m. 53 12 100 2 7:00 p.m. 100 13 100 4 8:00 P.M. 42 11 100 5 9:00 P.M. 29 9 29 1 10:00 P.M. 30 8 8 1 11:00 P.M. 40 3 - 0 ' Subset of database q Institute of Tiransportation Engineers 268 Parking Generation, 3rd Edition i O f/h CO)0 UI3� Q Q Q Q w U C) G �j m m m m ~ W cc N C CO N CO O !� IL C7 N r m aE coLOMcoN�C LO co L a+ i Y d cp C7 r w Z— Q J M M tp N a cc d'p C a¢ Z F- cO) v C •L O z m J O G h t CO) < co N N N m Fr v w_ a to w a a a a a a CO N (O N c0 (p CO (O CO m v CV o) L Y LL N CAD N im O¢ N C co W w w �co J Y Y Y Z J z LL CO CO CO >; c m O iD (� ccN co om a� a� a� a E U o 0 o Z Y J J J d LL CI] cn ui L6 CV C'7 r`LU _LL U) CCO CEO N a 3 ITE ■ Trip Generation Handbook Chapter 5 C C C C C F 1— H C 2 00 co rn i a co N r-- CO N N (0 l N r LJL LJL LJL LLLL M ca O O O OF L'I1*9iul-):l("Dl zl�l�l�l a t= 13 C O M W j c N t ui ; a i o QE .0- a I r a . Y � ~ � m3 c c N N W a O O co Q W C m m E 0 c U cn Q c O m CL w 0 i ¢F o (/) Y J C LO Q m 2' a. W V aQ W LU W¢ d co M > Z ¢ � J F ca a Z¢ 1 I �m a ga. LO N a Q ci wo co 0 ~ a M O (n LL 0 > O CO Z N C Z } Q UJ 00 0) 00 0 O) O) .1 } r r uj W It>l tD W }} Y Y co- o Q d cc U C N O CO O J uJ LL O co I U O N Q O Q O Q O Q U CIOC E C C C E C E C C CC O co — ❑ 0- — Q a. — Q E E ¢ ai cUn Q vVi Q Q ai Q O C C C C co m cr m m m m W D Lu LO �aYaJ C 2 ca >O O a a m LO 00 _o CV N (A r— (Ni (D N m ° _ a N 't Nr (NO Lu >Z¢ M f I Q o r V N I` r M N N [L a I LO I CO O � Z � LO M ML N Z m :3a N co N > LL. a ~ E E E E Q E Q o d a d a N ,T M N 0. I crLU O p O p g Acl 0 0 y m 0)a ?? N 0 c2 (z a ci a Y a) N 00 Y ~ 4 0- LL 00 M O CQ O m 9 w co co v v v H J a a¢ 03 N C LO co COO O N N LO Q T D j 0) (3) (3) (3 r r r r Z ca LL LL LLco �•-•., 7 7 r� a a) UJ O > _ Y}}} (T O O O �Cu6 c6 cU (0 N J C 4 c3 cd cd CEO •� •: • � •m •� •D •N •� O g a N (X) oD C(7 Lr) (D Q- H J J J J LO O m cn l06 to W d a M (,3 C6 6 O 2 ~ OV 2 (6 � N 0)Q 0 N C C Trip Generation Handbook. 2nd Edition Chapter 5 0 ITE 65 4220.050 Pass -By Rates Adopted 3131103 unless otherwise noted, First Revision 10/11104 (1) For any given land use being reviewed by DPW, if a pass -by rate is not included in the table shown in Subsection 4220.050(2) below, but an average pass by rate for the AM and/or PM peak hour is included in the ITE Trip Generation Report, then the ITE average pass -by rates shall be used. (2) For Drive -Through Espresso Stands, Daycare Located on Arterials, Specialty Retail, Health Clubs, and Video Store the following pass -by rates shall apply: ITE Code Description Pass -By Rates Conditions Espresso 100% Apply this rate only to free-standing, no sit - Stand down. drive -through -only espresso stands 565 Daycare 75% Apply this rate only to daycare facilities located on arterials. 814 Specialt 25% Retail 493 Health Club 54% 896 Video Store 53.5% for ADT, 80% for peak -hour trips 912 1 Drive-in Bank 47% (3) Unless stated otherwise in an adopted DPW Rule, the pass -by rate for PM peak hour trips will be used for average daily trips (ADT). (Adopted 8/8/00) 4220.060 Traffic Counts Adopted: 111103, First Revision 10/11104 (1) Traffic Studies provided for large developments will need to include traffic counts for any impacted key intersections on critical arterial units. These counts are necessary to estimate future volumes and to support the forecast assignments of trips from the development at the intersections. (2) DPW has a regular program of conducting traffic counts and may be able to provide the developer with acceptable counts. DPW will determine whether or not specific available traffic counts are acceptable. For purposes of future analysis of level of service for traffic studies, the count date should not be more than one year prior to the submittal date of the report. An older count is only acceptable with prior written permission from the department. For other purposes, such as screening or assistance with trip distributions, counts may be up to two years old. When acceptable counts are not available from DPW, developers must provide new counts with their traffic studies. (3) DPW may develop guidelines to be used to determine whether or not counts are acceptable and a standard format for counts, including a tabular format. 4220.070 Trip Distributions and Assignments Adopted. 111103, First Revision 10/11104, Second Revision 12/9/07 (1) Trip distribution means applying the trip generation to the road system to forecast the number of new vehicle trips on specific roads in the system. A "trip distribution" is a type of traffic analysis that estimates the likely destinations of trips generated by a proposed development and the likely traffic routes to reach those destinations. The result of this analysis is a map or list indicating what number or percentage of trips from the proposed development are added to the development's road system, including the number or percentage of trips added to individual traffic movements on arterial units and/or at intersections. The analysis provides a set threshold, consisting of a predefined number or percentage of trips below which no attempt is made to further distribute the trips onto the road system. DPW Rules Page 9 of 12 Transportation Impact Fee Update Table 3. Components of Impact Fee Schedule I GFIR & I'LLR$ Trip Land Use Unit of Basic Rate PM Peek New Trips New Trip Trip Length Length Land Uses Code Measure Trips/Unit % Rate (miles) Ad). Factor Residendal -- Single FarnI (Deiache[i 210 dwellin 1,01 1DD% 1.01 3.5 1.17 Mulli Family -Townhouse & Duplex 22Q 221, 230, dwellin 0.62 100% 0.62 3.7 1.23 Senior Housing& AccessaryDwelling233 dwelling0.31 100% 0.31 2.8 0.93 Mobile Home 2.A0 dwelling 0.59 100°I° 0.59 3.5 1.17 Commercial • Services 912 GFA 25.02 50% 12.91 1.5 0,60 Bank Day Care 565 SF GFA 1246 75% 9.35 2.0 0.87 HctelfMotel 310, 32D room 059 100% 0.59 4.0 1.33 Fueling Service Station' 944. 945. 946 Position 13.38 30% 4.01 1.7 0.57 Servicing Quick Lubrication vehicle Shop941 Positions 5.19 70% 3.63 1.7 0.57 ,Automobile Care Center 942 SF GLA 3.38 75% 2,54 2.2 0.73 Movie Theater 444,445 seal 0.07 85% D.06 2.3 0.77 Health Club 492 493 SF GFA 3.53 75% 2.65 3.1 1.03 Marina 420 Berth 0.19 90% 0.17 3.1 1.03 lnsr/[ut[orrai' FEfementa (Junior High/ High School 520. 522.53 student 0.13 80% 0.10 2.0 0.67 Universlt lColi a 540.550 student 0.21 90% 0.19 3.0 1.00 Church 560 SF GFA 0.55 100% 0.65 3.7 1.23 Hos ital 610 SF GFA 1.14 80% 0.91 5.0 1.67 Srsl Liwng, ursing oma. Group Home 620.254 bed 0.22 100% 0.22 2.8 0.93 fndustr/af Light Industry, Manufacturing, Industrial Park 110. 140. 130 SF GFA 0.86 100% 0.86 5.1 1.70 Warehousin 150 SF GFA 0.32 100% 0,32 5.1 1.70 arehouse 151 SF GFA 0.26 1 0.26 5.1 1.70 Restauranf Restaurant 81 5F GFA 49 BON 3.4 1.13 Fast Food Restaurant 34 SF GFA 92 2.0 0.67 Retail enter u to 49 999 820 SF GLA 10,05 50°I° 5.D3 1,3 0.43 50,00�9g 999 820 SF GLA 7.00 55% 3.85 1.5 0.50 100.000-199,999 820 SF GLA 5.56 6D°/° 3.34 1.7 0.57 200.ODD-299.999 820 SF GLA 4.70 65% 3.Q5 1.7 0.57 300 000-399 999 820 SF GLA 4.21 70% 2.95 2.1 0.70 over 400,000 820 SF GLA 3.87 75%. 290 2.4 0.00 Supermarket > 5 000 SF 850 SF GFA 10,50 75% 7.88 2.1 0.70 Convenience Market r 5,000 SF 851 SF GFAM3.8 23.58 1.3 0.43 Furniture Store B90 SF GFA 0.27 1.7 0.57 Car Safes - NewlUsed 841 SF GFA 207 4.6 1.53 Nursery/Garden Center 817 SF GFA 2.66 2.1 0.70 Pharrnac 1Dru are880.881 SF GFA 4.21 1.7 0.57 Hardware/Building Materials Store < 25.000 SF 812 SF GFA 4.49 60% 269 2.1 0.70 Discount Merchandise Store 813, 815, 861, (Free Standing)863.864 SF GFA 4.44 70% 3.11 2.1 0.70 Video Rental 896 SF GFA 13 60 45% 6.12 1.7 0.57 p@r�ertl 2a,Q0O SF 862 SF GFA 2.37 1.3 • 2.1 0 70 55% Miscaflaneous Reza+l 820 SF G 3 73 75% 2.80 2.4 0 80 City of Olympia Transportation Impact Fee Program Update December 2008 Page 11 H d d LL v CO a LL C �q7 Nf0 r O1NNpp ODn MN �� Oto rM I� N NM{$p 4 O�Qp l�.9 f�m �Or ��pppm NNn(Oln�8 �OrEO Np 100 .V: ' ntApNp�LLp7�NCD �� iAN Nf9 W dl�Y9 W fR �19 �IO�+tf1N�?Qr W d!� �19 (A rW M�y�1RH MM MNHW 69 6a E I` a I s CNDO nN Nr" M0n000 �ON N fO ONM� (mM OOD OOMNcoo L1NOCR CN0 'Nco Of co qrN r.0 h(P It (y 0).00 OC(OG r 0M GCOGMM rMMN M a+ m 2 Im 7L m :0 00000000 • O 0 0 0 0 0 O gp 0 0 p O O C O O •CO p O S O S S S O O O 000000 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 G O O 000.O O O O O O O OOpp pp 0 0 �p 0 0 O 0 S O 0 0 0 �11n iO N N N 0 0 0 to W N N N N 0 0 0 (n v70� N �yy N 0 0 0� (O Y N 0 �... ` m a LL r r r r r r r r o. � or m�.�.N000•00000000 0 00000o00 00 0000p 00000000000000000o p00000000000o inIn10v+�n itinnnn 'c m no-n '000 f m - r .- o000Q m o.mLL c c c c e �r— c c c A.6 'n_D_» c C a U- C7VC7C7c9C7C7C9cy7.(�C7C7 aWa U. U< U< Is LL CD0 S. LA O) C C,C CA C yaapO W tll N N W W N f0 W N W EEEEWOOOC S O S S pppOOpp -per yC a ¢¢ V Oj{p00000 S OS oO 000 SppO �I�OS i� 0Q. SOOSO�O S ,= 7��I� m� �� 3 O O•O 00 1 cn Lu 0 ; NN00 •C fO VI 'am nM�O 0)N •Nm �p00 OT N On �MODM Mnr�0000 OM��yyMOON��pp �inN 007NOML�] rOnN '(D NO7 d•No n aCL C OOCO OG C CONO M.- C16r r Cr(:CO O0O C M fN YQcgN •CCO•C W —a 0 0 OOpprNM 9�01n In ppO f0n Nhn0(O rrrt��] M NO nCO N:00(np NNN {��p �Ow OO NN OrOONM N rrrr m[O m t.1N NN NNNNNN N N10 QQYQQQ��MN(n '�11104)�nmf0 M04MM W 000O J O M MM MMM `-+" r M N �r r r r Q r r rr M M Z C O a w w 5 40W F m o rn E w o $o m LL L 1 _ a`s E C1 m NI •i�LL m� Dc �� UJS C W v gEam�G �U K3g SY c ©_m cgdl `a xa �-` 1 gip` Bch 8 0— E c U. o m x8m=�� cS �x om ax aka m ° m ��qp ama �ZU ma wp °i>1•� aU'�iRy� om3mr�fA $ L � = Z_�`T�°, @ a@ w $ a, C d 01 m O O �e (giNp m m m 0 0 m m ym9 'C — w m '0 L S 7 O— Y3�a 7 m tq x2z y aJ•LL�2ti�U W.D:O' amCc7��ci►-Q wo �2f�o�Sz `J m a LL� � a.�.. �Tmprp��TOp0p �Oml9m�!IO+�ONO pp{t{tpp�no pmp pNNp��Ooof OMNIAN mMN�}r� gi�mptp�r�'Nt� OOfO O 'NNp �pp1 hN< N N mn�t� L14 `�na fop l�fD� n�m8i m moo• I:N tCJ uq m" NNaI+O�m WYIMW�yyH•N Ncm fA.�MNN►N!d}y�y�W�p Op: tp Ld"f Nmh�N dI re7amapp Y/MH NHN W�04 d► Gr�pp fR Yt��y�HWFIf Ea F=- 3 mtOmsrDmerr Nl�rma Nrrtf IO Of iDminti�NUD��Of�O7ml�a tO0 O) In mLn f�rl� VJn�•07 er t0�• cD V•N� N OIN mNtO M1O �f`n 1!)g7r N rM N r t0 c7 N t'j 'N c7 to G co c+ n0 •O T 0 to Y� �y'M 1O N•NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 0 Lo N1OMIO 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 NlO c,4 0 0 0 O N 0 0 0 NN O 0 0 0 ID 1O 1O N N NNNN 0 0 0 4ON tO �D 0 0 m to to N N N 0 0 0 MID to NNNN 0 0 0 N1O 1O NNt�.N 0 0 0 r IO tO to NN NN 0 0 0 r 1171A lA !NNNN 0 0 0 lAON 0 0 0 r T T f 20 O W r r r r r T r r r T T r T T T T r T T r r r 0_ LL m nO o O. H O s T =i N v 0 -� U. co cq o o 'o 0 0 N ti NO tO tO �UD 0 o c o 0 ID IO 0 0 0 N 1� I�tO o c o R O O F tOmM 0 0 0 a T cc�91 O1 0 0 o N O 1 O IO IO I+P c o 0 1 O 1 �u1 o c o P c O m sf st u7 o c c O O S 00 S S S r p S O O r W KID a � � i Iccc c Saaaaa Qaa$ a a a- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa m I I I w w I I LL LL LL aaa¢aaaaa L6 LL LL lLL LL LL LL LL LL ClM(D0.008000mtn ILL LL LL LL LL J LL LL LL L<L 2000 0O1C7O(7C900LI(9C9000 00010(90000 :. 'rn°rnio'�nwwawo��nc�crm�na`W w�a'�n'fAa�w'Si�n'�i w�nw '�'�iin'%inr`o'�n�n j S 00000coog==�g00000e000$SSOS$$SS •O 0 0 0 0'a O O o LL LL LL W O O O 0 0 LL. o 0 0 $S$$ 0C SSSS or0000 o•00000•Z0000002�oQ0000000000CD00000 rT zM.0 r rr � ' r .- � »> > Ys_�^ `1 '13� •mNO 0 rm MD m r;l- O �Nr M tOO (A v0rfO ;cm coa, n%Lna O y aoW, c MNfTNmt)NNRrn0 �. r4NID rmhl'� OI�pf(`V Vm'7 chmhr.0 m tl 7 romr a. � IL 0 to � NNmm mcocccoco ��o�i��id�`��a`�o� Qen � m��o�omo,a� tmotint= n;-�n% 1 n 0 m ,m r r mr rmmmm mmm Z `m 0 O a W W L m QL c ,�� 1 a �p $• pai� i UU 3 3 a 0 � U ` 33coI cco c 0 a mC9 o = 33 N c m� 0 ID 0 m VJ tot y @F� 3 m {{{pp¢ 4J 'LCG CCW do W 8 y? 8 = S to y�� 333Q 2 ❑ ^ O� W " 3 N ¢ � — W O N U . v n. 8 O J U W M a mCG N tq tq C C C W o m« N cl m d m 'CC — d10 V n v G r to u W N yi$Q {Sp s �Q,� W~ w N y� O Y W L tll d y E❑ _ LL LL U U d o o—o y€ c i >> o W U ai t� E U! f!J LO Doom a s c O L y m D ❑ �N W W O LLLL❑�aZaC9C9(7yF=3an00000xwr�¢aaLL�IDm o O6y6V� 7 7 m N W 000.ccc�oE�+�aW W L 7 0 0 0 !� 0 ON rE8cc O. L L 7 'O 0 W _ccLl m O UC7Ut/J�7j0�ID C6 �o MA rs N W a �cN ��gp 0a N pl N E0. NNW a r 0o �aoo �A� c; �oo �o m z 11n7 M 07 a! V m co en F` L� A LL LL I a Ic � a7 �;s�osso 00 LL ac LL LL LL LL 0000CD LL L9N �000 o mg x� n�Nv o000 N co mm oc D.r- r -a C p V�UfA m U o z e 0 v w U rn U to 9 C •e p J °3 Y W �3g I�-a. Z 0 g QU U w LU U a m � � m v £ .5 � c m m E v 5 a T CD g� m m m g C a m CL o U � 2 ID vi ,5n8�cC9 Y aab•c 7 m W Q ~ a O c m CUB a � FL .L° 5 •Si •r o CD C Y' c j3Z. � m O (D � �� L) aa.0 n c :s CD IS v m E10 a a w cY acs � a C $a mo_ m m m a Vai m` @ a - yE a bUQ=z ICJ W z co Transportation Impact Fee Update 2009 Table 4. Impact Fee Schedule Components 'f Frl-1R & f FLRS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Land Use Residential Single Family Multi -Family iTE Land Use Code Code 210 220,221, 230 Unit of Measure dwelling dwelling rlp Rate 1.01 0.62 New Trip % 1001/o 100% T i Rate 1 1.01 0.62 Avg. Trip Length 1.7 1.8 Trip Length Adjust - meet 1.13 1.20 Senior Citizen Dwelling 251.252 Dwelling 0.31 100% 0.31 1.4 0.93 Commercial - Services Drive-in Bank 912 sf/GFA 25.82 55% 14.20 0.7 0.47 Hotel 310 room 0.59 100% 0.59 1.9 1.27 Motel 320 room 0.47 100% 0.47 1.9 1.27 Day Care Center 565 sf/GFA 12.46 75% 9.35 1.0 0.67 Library 590 sf/GFA 7.30 75% 5.48 0.8 0.53 Post Office 732 sf/GFA 1 11.12 75% 8.34 0.8 0.53 Service Station 944 VFP 13.87 60% 8.32 0.8 0.53 Service Station with Minimart 945 sf/GFA 97.08 45% 43.69 0.8 0.53 Auto Care Center 942 sf/GLA 3.38 70% 2.37 1.0 0.67 Movie Theater 444,445 seat 0.07 85% 0.06 1.1 0.73 Health Club 492,493 sf/GFA 3.53 75% 2.65 1.5 1.00 Commercial - Institutional Elementary School 1520 sf/GFA 1.21 80% 0.97 0.9 0.60 Middle/Jr High School 522 sf/GFA 1.19 80% 0.95 1.2 0.80 High School 530 sf/GFA 0.97 80% 0.78 1.5 1.00 Assisted Living, Nursing Home 254,620 bed 0.22 100% 0.22 1.3 0.87 Congregate Care 253 dwelling 0.17 100% 0.17 1.3 0.87 Church 560 sf/GFA 0.55 100% 0.55 1.8 1.20 Hospital 610 sf/GFA 1.14 80% 0.91 2.0 1.33 r ■r�awn I:l7wetaagrant R over Restaurant) 931 932 sf/GFA sf/GFA 7.4 11. ° 4.12 6.13 1.6 1.1 1.07 0.73 50/6 934 sf/GFA 33.84 To 16.92 1.0 0.67 Espresso with Drive -Through 938 sf/GFA 75.00 20% 15.00 1.0 0.67 Commercial - Retail Shopping Cl. ^inn r`cnfor up to 99,999 820 sf/GLA 8.00 55% 4.40 0.7 0.47 100,000-199,999 820 sf/GLA 5.56 60% 3.34 0.8 0.53 200,000-299,999 820 sf/GLA 4.70 65% 3.06 0.8 0.53 300,000-399,999 820 sf/GLA 4.21 70% 2.95 1.0 0.67 over 400,000 820 sf/GLA 3.87 75% 2.90 1.1 0.73 Supermarket 850 sf/GFA 10.50 65% 6.83 1.0 0.67 et 851 sf/GFA 52.41 4 ° 20.96 0.6 0.40 Miscellaneous Retail 814,820 sf/GFA 3.73 55% / 2.05 0.9 0.60 r notes City of Des Moines August 2009 Page 14 Transportation Impact Fee Update 2009 Table 4. Impact Fee Schedule Components (Continued) Friiii & f iris TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Avg. Trip ITE Land Use Unit of Basic New New Trip Length Land Use Code Measure Retpe Trip % Ram Length AdJust- (miles)ment Commercial - RetailShopping (Cor►tinued) Free Standing Discount Store 813, 815, 857, 863,864 sf1GFA 4.67 70% 3.27 1.1 U. Hardware/Paint Store 816 sf/GFA 4.84 45% 2.18 1.0 0.67 Furniture Store 890 sf/GFA sf/GFA 0.45 45% 0.20 0.9 0.60 Home Improvement Superstore 862 2.37 50% 1.19 1.1 0.73 Pharmacy (with Drive -Through) 881 sf/GFA 10.35 50% 5.18 0.8 0.53 Car Sales -New/ Used 841 sf/GFA 2.59 80% 2.07 2.1 1.40 Commercial - Office General Office up to 99,999 710,715 sf/GFA 2.70 90% 2.43 2.2 1.47 100,000-199,999 710,715 sf/GFA 1.65 90% 1.49 2.2 1.47 200,000-299,999 710,715 sf/GFA 1.44 90% 1.30 2.2 1.47 over 300,000 710,715 sf/GFA 1.35 90% 1.22 2.2 1.47 Office Park 750 sf/GFA 1.48 90% 1.33 2.2 1.47 Medical Office 720 sf/GFA 3.46 75% 2.60 2.1 1.40 Industrial Light Industry/Manufacturing 110,140 sf/GFA 0.97 100% 0.97 1 2.2 1.47 Heavy Industry 120 sf/GFA 0.68 100% 0.68 2.2 1.47 Industrial Park 130 sf/GFA 0.86 100% 0.86 2.2 1.47 Mini-Warehouse/Storage 151 sf/GFA 0.26 100% 0.26 2.2 1.47 Warehousing 150 sf/GFA 0.32 100% 0.32 2.2 1.47 Notes: sf/GFA = square feet Gross Floor Area sf/GLA = square feet Gross Leasable Area For uses with Unit of Measure given in sf, trip rate is given as trips per 1,000 sf VFP = Vehicle Fueling Station (Maximum number of vehicles that can be fueled simultaneously) City of Des Moines /6 August2009 Page 15 NOR W f`! oNl, v 0010 [*Y, �D {�!l9m mla09. maO W OYA tOL, COI! m C1r IYi NIL] SaV N Nf�V vNNSO fCVF NN6GY7 prmmW+D III [FY t+J f�'1 P]4v v u] f`� cn co io l'1 Nl N]Y Nv[o� W W ailmmmm G 00000 m o ooa 000lo ccaoodeio NV [�niN Yrr� ei !ym!['1 e9 !po A M1fp N LU W W IOM1AmIa YrOgOW 1n[poVmvn Vi wto Y71fi Y]4]11]In 4'] �M[•l O 10 eM�1, V YA9, GCO�nQOIV pAp 1[+Y'I�NNN nM aOC ymmmmmYl [�.nm ta•11� Y1V 19 ['1 ML'1 v1 I� �yN H�� m � W co �iu'ym�� m �mm9u4imnrA' �uQin�n� no'w3E a,mmmm R 4qp l;R 7mM�w� b rF lnan.. vYr Y Y N Fmvj C M1I'1 QD40'11n �'F c�.l [mil tOf [V CiPAm �4�C��QQ4000aQQ4QQQ6¢¢ LL k LLLL LLLLIA. k>�LLLL LLLL W LL 4QQ¢d¢¢¢ 51LLLLkti.k V-LL �LRc�C7i7U' c� � r.ii7L�U' c�(9c��C1 L7s�LD 0c.iC7 C7f7c�i7C7c�ca� 14LLLLLLli.LL tp0 NfR LL 0 LL LLG4 0 VI"wiA0N LLLL LLLLLLLLLL 0 (a 4li NfR LLLLLL tqN LO LLLLLLi.r. ww W LLLL wm?A LLLL ww S 0 8 g Q o0 9 g"8,�89 0gpr�oo o�' ag $ti E o g oa SSa$ao o 0 A a {T Vp'� FOr mf��pm ,o � � ��N1m [�l T 1� a n ��❑ N g �ammwg mmm � m�eo m S4�? �!a J.= o$$ t o G2 h a }O a 'm E s $ E _ is L us Q m pppo N$ t0 7.B py�s C m Qug �O to V - Z la IN � LOI om O y N O1 m od co N E N d N N n 'C 0 v f0 N mayy: � m q O m O c 0 o = n � a c 12 c C •O O � u�i n c m f0 j 7 m C�vE E� c E.c �' •_ m � � •c 10 � Yl C Lyy m � C tD NZ WU Z 5 m E t Z^ m C O Q E O `o f E$ m N E o N Es, C m N O y Z•wv Elo J Eg LL � a E U LL 'c m`1g �tij�y n 5 mm aru a E 0 0 m lrfic�c � m _ moQr- _=_ �vai p1 l �C90 U A)� J �� lAL LL IQi�IaL IC M CNN V11') i 00>W I1� li of W 7 w� W L N W LL V a E 0 eo F- d Z it O is C am C O a 0 U �M W a a mam mmcoc�u�mr�opp�n� ((ppmr�mao v {{pp1�pp m„q P m ^gym �O h^ N W N CJ Nn N V N V Yf I� N N N M 1� N v1 ^ m m fW0• m r m V to O d N h W V N N m m u'1� 1 n O UI W m m N v7 Pl R t0 an v m m O �D 1� VS IA cq N m n M n n V (q If1 OO f] ^ P of O N ^ O ^^ m m N ID N 1+ m m O m O cc 0 0 0 0 0 O M C 0 0 0 0 ,d v Wupp] wm�noq^Nobnm N�oc�n r•� O G� n�'o O� W O rNm N N m�p N Of D IV v K N N V 'm m wN N m s�i N m v NNf ai Id fG W m V CV N LaLnLno mowwo e cce ��xxo �o �e �� W a a) c'+ w m n aW V h o^ m m m m m m m m umi a �W m m l� N h h V W 1� iL C0 N [� O W N tp N 66 m m O W 1l] P m v V m 0 N 0 m o �- Q m p In O O m O m c cl m m m c! r ^ 4!'1 N �- cm w N v �O t0 VN Y7 m V 1� h m t0 O 0D C m V Y1 O N N [v N V N M 1� G] I� N f0 O1 f0 ^ fp f J V fV Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 4 Q Q Q d Q Q Q Q Q Q Q !.� LL LL u 4 LL LL 'LL LL k LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL } N V1NNu7 �; [1N V7 y LLLL mV1 W RA U_ N:n LL LL 'A U)(n LL LL LL Cl) Co LL LL Co fA LL LL w fQ 3 coon p p O O O p Op p D 7 OO O O 0 C J O O pO �o O O b So4d �bS p O�ONop pd S OO pOp OOO 00 N 0 O N N G Iq r .- 117 O N N f7 Y N N o N O yNy O O y�j O O ;J Y O O O 0 p a N N v N N m CD t0 CD w N f7 1� O V W m a N y fY �D � (7 h�� m �D C' m m {� Ol ^ N V u7 If1 N N W n IA N N V Q L 0 � 0,0 e� z m m n = U m �cY m!eC L° it cJ LL N k' S (� �v�..v' mU�" y F 3 O Y W O G G— 6 to E Q� V W mO�ds W VS 'RQi7C� W Q zmT 'u�a M 0 O M N Opp O m M d N E N Q N C m Cm 0 a Qi LL W U lC Q C Appendix A Worksheet for Transportation Itrt act Fee of New Deveio fnettt on the Arterial System of the City of Fife, WA. Pursuant to Ordinance No. f619-07. Development Name: Street Location: City Case Number: Size of Development: Residential : Enter number of dwelling units: (a} Other. Enter building square feet r 100D, or other unit if applicable. (see Table 1) units: Faster ITE Land Use Code (or word description) from Table 1 colurnns 1-2, tar reference: ITE L.U. Code: Transportation Impact Fee Rate per Unit of Development: Enter corresponding Fee per Land Use Unit from Table 1 last column: (b) Note: Fee rate per Land Use Unit is based on adopted Fee per Vehicle -Mlle of Impact at top of Table 1. Car -based Fee for this Development: Multiply factors together: (a) x (b) Additional Truck Impact (Non -retail land uses only); Industrial developments: enter Percent Heavy Trucks, If greater than 1%. Other developments enter zero at (d) and (f). Factor for Additional Truck Impacts (see report for explanation) Multiply Car -Based Fee x Percent Trucks x Truck Factor (or enter zero if no trucks) ` ofz.i.i. fame for this 00v�_Oop jara: Add adcfit,iohal tvuCK iCrtiw' m-W�arcz ilT1pa;: David Evans and Associates, Inc. HNmpact Far Workbook Bluth whh Bxtm Pages - add Carina 0 Appendix S. Traffic Impact Rate Table Pao Rate par Daily VMT = $ 473 e) This table uses RE to ddveway IriP rates, v4an adjwbnants, to derive the Tel new Impad Par unit of davebpmeN, In vatrlde•rMealrsvaled (VMf). ass RE for detob of land use eatepaiss. N-E ITE ffE 1'fE plBCOUNT DISCOUNT AVEAA6E NET NEW FEE PER ITE LAND USE LAND US L1lNT Il8 AVERADE GROSS7RIP PASS -BY 1t1TRA•C 7'R1P VMT, ;FPS LAND USE DOD6 UNITt'n SIZEar pATE)UNfT TRIPS LENGTHt`a MTElUNIT UNIT NAME 5)gnaluro elements: places where people IA19 Vdih acdva lifestyles. Afternoon peak hour ESif}EHTfAL lrarpc is malnly Inbound. Sing(e-family (fiats had) dvraling 210 Dwell 214 9.6 0% 10% 1.59 13,7 .6 6,478 _ Duplex (detached) dwelling ma 2M Dwelling same 9.6 0% 10% 1.59 13.7 S 6,478 Multifamily, 3+bedrooms uee23s Dwelling234 7.4 0% 1D% 1.59 10.6 $ 6,076 MulNamily, under 3 bedrooms bond W. 221,230 Dwelling 250 6.0 096 10% 1.59 8.6 $ 4,061 Mobile Home Perk 240 Dwelling 168 5.0 0% 10% 1.59 7.1 $A2,315 Selfcontained Retirement Community m 2¢t Dvrelq 862 3.7 096 1096 _ 1.59 5.3 $ Senior Adult Housing -Attached 252 Dwelling 147 3.5 0% 10% 1.59 6.0 S Congregate Care Facility. Nursing Home, pfaase sae Non-Rarfall, esdstedAWng fadhWes Flderdv HruminQ (Atlached) $ 6.364 S 6.696 $ 6.696 $ 4,045 %Tim $Yp476 %Tim $ 3 477 %TIM $ 1906 %TI'' $ 748 %-rerl $ 474 %T<" $47480 05%T'"x1"l 47 L$ 560 $ 477 Notes: (1) V.S.P. (Vehicle Servicing Position) = space provided for one vehicle to be fueled or washed; not reassarly "ptanps" or'Teses^ (2) Use total rooms for holellmotel; 15% vacancy frector is incorporated In gross trip rate. Fxcludw radities with me)or resiMfenls and meeting pietas. (3) Insllulion of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 71h edition. Some RE rats are amoofhad and averaged to eliminate statistically inslgnificent differences- (4) Pass -by Diversion Reduction e"rretes trips diverted from the stream of traffic "passing by" a relal site, which add no vehicle -miles of imPad on the road syelem. (5) Not New VMT Impact Trip Rate - rrE Gross Trip Rate " ( 1 - % Pass -by - % Intra-City)' Average Trip Length (6) For shopping centers over 65,000 sq. (L. we ITE for l)gar ftft trip rate formula (7) A retirement community Is "selfcornaked' only N it provides a full range or realities on -ails for medical ran, recreation, shopping. diming, etc, similar to a small cily. For'bsslsted Iivklg" retkament Willies serving the non -driving elderly with caregivers, employed on -site, use Congregate Care Centers under NON -RETAIL, (8) Average size of developments comprising the ITE database May be useful to distinguish between otherwise siMil r-sounding classes. (9) Trip rate for any land use not coverod by Ih% We shall be datermUed by the Director of Public Works. (10) Discards half of each trip beginning and ending within city, to avoid charge for same impad at both ends. (11) Average miles per net new trip on city Streets (only), determined using Fife Traffic Forecasting Model (12) This land use generates heavy truck travel. Truck surcharge must be calculated, (13) Units expressed as 1DD0 sq. ft. refer tohabitable gross building area, not land area. Units expressed as "scree" refer to Isrd area. Appendlx B. Traffic Impact Rate Table Fee Rate Par Oally VMT = $ 473 T.m_ �.u.......ro (4�.an rem weh adiwirn ils. to derive the not new imped per unit of devabpmaM. In vehioWmller'r WOW M4T). Ses ITE for details or IBM use edagorhM. W 5,392 S 4,848 J 4f$81 $ 4 601 3,7 1 $ 24,157 $19,410 $19177 $15,530 S 15,521 S 13JU $10.462 $ 8.170 $ 7,132 $ 4,441 Notes: (1) V.S.P- (VahkAo Salt' ong Position) = epasa pMV4o7 (of or* vararao to Me Waled or washed; not necessarily VJMW Of "hoses" (2) Uae fated foams for hotollmotel: 15% vatansy factor Is inwWaled in gross trip rare. Eiackmdas faelMTiss wgh major reetetnems and mesting P190W (a) Inm1AJon of Transpo"Ilon Engineers. Trip Gonwatlon, 71h eklion. Some 17e rates are anldMlfled and nMeged to anmkmle da1lsfically ins grnficant dlfioronws. (4) Pass.My bivar5lon Reduction eliminates Inge diverted $om the alream Mi tr fft -Paesrrlg W, a retail rile, wnlch add no Vehicle -miles of imµad on the road Symtlm• R Net New VM1T Impact Trip Ram - ME Gross Trip We ' ( 1 - %paasby • % Irate-Clly)' Average Trip Length . to) For shWpirg censers ovor 55,<100 50. r+.. sea M for logarithmla Idp rats lormuia. (7) Araifae mnrd Cowou,nity }z -all-cW1A:naT only Y It plovldes a full range QU661ill" on -sae for mcdlcal nets, reuoation, "pping, dinlii% atc. ;i 1811a a Smsll City. For-asisled livinr rofnemerd facletlas serving the non-*9nng eidmrty wllh caregwon employed OD Pta. tray Cengrega'A Corn Cen(aes under NON -RETAIL (a) Averrage six& of deyefopmenta cwnprislog Its TTE dotaMase. May bo useful 10 dieling.tish ootwean o%oradse sunder-rwndvrg claswa (9) Trip rate for any land use not covered by this %pale awls Co determined by trio Dkector of Public Woks. (10) Dlsceunts halt or each trip Leglnn)ng arrd ending vdlhin Oly, to wME chargo for same impact at both ends 01)Avaaaa miles per not new trip an city streets {ratty), deleemined using Fife Traffic Forecasting Model (12)Thls IwW use 9"Iatas t navy truck larval. TruEk surdfarpo must Me cslCumlod. (13) Unhs expressed as 1000 0q iI refer to hat)i Mla Cress ouiiaufa area, not land erect Units expressed as "atlas" refer to land area 02- Appendix B. Traffic Impact Rate Table Fee Rate per Dally VMT■ $ 473 This table uses ITE m driveway trip rates, with adjustments, to derive the net new iripacl per unit of development, In vdhldrmllas-lravaled CAM. See ITE for Weis of h14 use catsgodas. $lprlaturo elomerila: norhrasiderltial activity with trallic gerlerated RI,1lrtryr by Customers ETA I L or patrons, not employees. Inbound and outbound are roughly equal moat of the &Y- rmmrur Retail FOCUS Apparel Store Shopping Ctr, under 65,000 sq. ft m Convenience Market Hardware, pairit Crory Building Materials & Lumber Store Specialty retail center (ship many Video Rental Store PharmacyrDir" Store Bann. drive-in T discount superm arket Bank, walk-in 870 020 651.053 618 - 812 814 m on, Sal 912 loon sq. n. 1000 sq 1t• 1000 sq R. 1000 sq. h. s 5o 9 21 66.4 70.0 $40.0 51.3 20% 50% 66% 25% 50% 40% �80% 60% 1.52 1.52 32.3 31.9 $ 16,276 $ 15,099 1.62 1.52 29.2 23A $13,604 $ 11,063 10008q n. 10oo a% n. low sq. A. 10a0sq n. 1000 sq- a. 11 405 7 13 4 46.2 44.3 140.0 eat 2a6-S 20% 20% F715% 60% 60% so% so% 80% 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.62 1.52 22.0 _ 21.6 19.2 19.0 18.7 $ 10 390 $ 10,197 $ & 069 5 8,968 $ 8.861 650,354 911 1000sq n. 1000 sq.R 62 5 102.2 166.6 80% eo% 1.52 1.52 17.1 16.6 $ 8,096 $ 7,S76 ILCOIrn •u (membership warehouse Mira) Bel 1000 sq. n, 112 - 41.e Electronics Sup tom ee3 1000 W 1L 37 46.0 Toy I Children's Sup__We sea _ too6 sq. n. 46 w.v tamd Free -sing DiscountSupdrVICte 813 1000sq. 0. 154 49-2 Freestanding Discount Store 815 1000 sq. n. ill Wo Home lmprovemenl supe(slore eel 1000 as n. 100 29..8 Factory Outlet Center 023 low se- IL 146 me Fumllure Store 800 18D0 sq, U. 67 5.1 Nursery Marten Center) e17 Apra. 4 96.2 Nursery (Wholasela) 31e Aaras 24 19.5 0% 20% 1.62 40.7 $19.234 20% 1.62 38.3 $18,134 0% $18,118 0% 40% 1.52 38.3 0% 40% 1.62 36.9 $16,982 0% 40% 1.52 36.8 $16.916 0% 20% 1.52 32.6 $16,426 0% 20% 1.52 29.1 S 13,764 Si 2,619 0% 20% 1.52 6.6 10% 20% 1.52 105.3 $ 49,803 10% to% 1.52 24.0 1 $14.366 'ECIAL CASES Signature Elements: Characterdetlss not matched with groups above State Motor Vehldes I Llwri I; g Agency 731 1000 sq. 11. 10 166.0 30% 5o% 1.52 88.3 MedicaVDental Office or Urn 630, 720 1000 sq. R 71 33.0 10% 50% 1.52 22.6 Hospital 610 10001%ft. 6W 17.6 10% 10% 1.52 21.6 US Poet Office 732 1000 s% n... 31 108.2 6016 ~ 70% 1.52 19.7 Day Care --- -- 565 -- -1000 sq, n. 4 79.3 _80% 95% 1.52 1. Ctaeino - Gaming Area basis cis 3" 1000 sq. 8. Room na 200 442.0 6.6 t0% 2% 0.33 28.6m312,y1D% [28.2 HoteUNlotel - no convention facilities tole 16z0 $ 41 777 $10,677 $10,232 $ 9,334 $ Gill S 60,851 $ 3,785 Notes: (1) V.S.P. (Va» wo Sarviang Pas, iim) = "m pmvldad for one vehicle to ba fumed or washed; not necessarily "pumps' or "hoses" (2) Use total rooms for hat911ntd161; 16%VSI;a y factor Is Incctporated in gross trip rate. Excludes fe Ain with major restaurants and meeting places. (3) insr8ulion of 7ranspo tatkr Enginoocs, Tip Generation, 71h eddlon. Soma Fre roles are smoothed and averaged to eliminate statistically Insignl0cant dKlarenws. (4) Fess•by Diversion Reduction ellmrnalas Inpe diverted from the sireard of tra!nc "passing by" a retail site, which add no vehicle -miles of Impact on Ute road system. (5) Net New VMT kapad Trip Rate x ITE Gross Trip Role . ( 1 - % Posa-try - % Infra-CAy) *Average Trip Length. (6) For shopping centers over $5.000 sq. ft.. see ITE for Ioserilhrk (rip raid forni ia- (7) A rsllrement community is 7saMaanl6kkaS only d it pmvtdas a full range of facilities on -site for medical care, recreation, stopping, dining, etc. similar to a small city. Fpr'4rcakted livkag"rg+lrOrhuml Tscilitlos sarvkg I. non -driving ekleny wdh carvgivttrs employed on -slits. use Congregate Caro Centers under NON -RETAIL (8) Average sirs of deveiapmaintc comprising the ITE dalsbase. r4ay be usaiul to dis6ngulsh betwgca otherwise similar-saundhg classes (9) Trip role for any rand %L" rim cotiwred by this labia ViWl be delermined by the Director of Public works (10j DiawuMa haft of gad+ pip begaoIng and sn&V wri hin City, 10 9Y04 charge far 0=0 mpact al bolt ands. (11) Average codas per net new trip on city sunets (dray), delerminad using File Tramc Frxe'.asikrg mocrol (12) Thrs land use gonemes heavy vuck travel. Truck surcharge must be cawGted. (13) V dts expressed as IWO so, R. refer W hahilable prose build:n0 area, nc! land arcs. Units expressed as "xres" refer to lard area. Private Education SU 534 S36 .PUbf Middle School 'Public High School yy Pdvale School K-8 1 'private School K-12 1.19 0.97 3.40 2.75 u r 0% 0 % 0% i. rou a 0.970 $ 3 400 i 2.750 S <.v< 7.64 5.76 _ 4AS vn per per . , '. Sq. FL Sq. Ft. ^Ess. Fl" Industrial 11 t Industria T 0.980 S 0.860 S 0.740 S 0.470 S 0.260 S 1.05 1.46 1.25 fl�80 , ' QAA r per per Sq_ FL _SQ_Fl. Sq. Ft. 130InIndustrial Park 0.88 O 140 Manufacturing 0.74_ 0% 150 Warehouse 0.47 " " 0% IS1 Mmri)•Warehouse 0.26 0% "_Sq. Ft. Sq. Fl. Medical 610 63p IN Hospital Cline acaliDentat Office 1 "18 5.78 3.72 0% 0°h 0% 1.180 S 5.180 $ 3.720 $ 2.00 8.78 Wiper 6.31 per per Sq Ft._ R. Sq. Ft. Office _ 710 General Office 715 - .,le Tenant Olfica 750 unice a - 1.49 0% _ 1.490 S 1 "730 S 1.500 S 2.53.pod 2.93�ei 2.ti4 per Sq. 89. Fl. 1,73 0% _ 1.50 1 0% Sq. Ft. Recreation _ Marina _ 430 }Golf Course 441 !Live Theater 491 'Rao*mtClub 492 Health Ftrless Club 495 Recreational Community Center 0.19 0.30 1.t]Q _- 0.64 4.05 1.64 h 5 25% 2S16 25% { 25% 25% 0.143 $ p. . AM $9.Ft._ 0.225 $ S61 per 0"750 S 1.27 pw 0.482 $ 0.82 per 3.038 $ 5.15 per 1 "230 $ 2.08 per Sq. Ft q. Ft. Sq. Ft. etall - Automotive 1 90 849 945 941 W2 944 946 947 Tire Stole Tire Superstore Gas Station wiConvenlance Market AL0 Repair8, Maln%ogance "Au�pj are Gas Station Gas & wlConv Mkl & Car Wash & ff Serve Car Wssh 4.15 _ _ y t i 13.38 5.19 3.38 1 13"86 _ 13,33 _ SSI 28% ! 2616 56% _ 42% 28% 42% 42% 429/6 f { 298 1.619 S 5"887 $ 3.410 S 2.434 $ B.039 $ 7.731 S 3.213 S 5.06 2.58 2.9791 5,102 4.i2 13,626 13,105 5A46 per per per per Per per per Der Sq. Ft, Sq. Fl, VSP VSP Sq" FL VSP VSP VSP Retail - Shopping _ 75 roe nl Store _85p Supermarket 651 Convenience Market 854 Discount SuPerrnarkel 892 Home Imp man[ Super Store 5.06 17% 4.200 7.12 per I Sq, FL 10.45 36% __6.688 S 11.34 �Qer _ 39.832 $ 67.51 r 8.099 i 13 73_ „ 54_Fl_ FL CSC - Fes• 52.41 8.90 2.45 4.50 _ 24% 9°/. 4B% 4p% 1.274 2.16 W I S . Ft. Electronics Super Store 867 Office Supply Superstore 813 'Free Standing Discount Superstore i t] Shopoit Center { 1 Millic_n Sp FI _ _2.700 S" 1.768 $ 2.554 $ 2.475 i 4116 3.00 4.33 _ 4.20 r �_ 'Wr7 _ r Sl)_FI. Sq. Ft. • Ft, 3.40 { 48% 3.87 34% 5.75 34% 861 Discountifiu�� 4.24 2.798 $ 4.74 per Sq. Fl. Retail - Services 814 Specially Retail Cent 445 Multiplex Movie Theater 816 ,IHardware/Paint Store 2.71 _ 25% _ �6_ 2.033 $ 3.445 _>j^ 2.759 $ 4.294 S 4. _ S '9 W S _ 17.570 S 3.45 8.84.E 4A8 _ 728 7 45 11.78 29.78 per per . per der r S , FI. SAJFI Sq. Ft. 5,22 _ _ ! 4.&i 4 880 :IPhannacymnjg Store -8B7 'PharmocylDrug. Store wfflrive.up 8.42 49% e.$2 4 _ 13.00 4976 896 911 W 2 831 Video Rental Storo _'Bank ' Bank with Drive -up Teller(s) Quell! Restaurant Sq. Ft. Sq. Pl. 39�75 4796 46,74 24242 S 4.194 S 6.224 'S _ _4.1._" 7,11 10.65 per r _par 5 . Ft. $ . F1. 7.49 44°% 932 High Turtgvof Reslauronl 10.92 43% Sq. Fl. 033 Fast Food 26.15 13.17 S 22.61 per Sq, Ft. 934 I Fast Feed wldrive-uup 34.64 17.666 $ 29.94 per Sq. Ft. 11.34 44% 6.350 S� 10.76 per _ 83g Drkddrq PI=91. Sq. F!• Commum Services 5 560 Library Church 0.66 0% 1 7.090 0.660 $ 1.12 per per . F. 13.18 0.75 75% 0% 3.295 $ 0.750 $ 5.59 1,271 per per Sq. Fl. Space _ 505 0 Cam Center OW -Pia and Ride with Bus Service 732 US Post Office 25.00 47% 1 13.250 5 22.46 per S . FL ` tns8lula of Tranepdrlation Engineers, Trio Generation i7th Ed[yorji '7h,s worksheel is NOT an ad-k- O We Na) of rWIaW use col 1 Trip generation rate per development unit, for PM Peak Hour of the adjacent street [ralfic 14.6 pro _Nele: Sq. Ft. rate expressed per 1000 SF. ' Average Pass -by Rates, per Trip Generation Handbook: an ITE Recommended Practice, March 2001 _ ' DU = dwelling unit. Sq. Ft. = Square Feet, VSP = vehicle servicing position " gahPk-. Wnrk. nll�. .nma. mixers-i- and m merdAl dAwtInnmanl In ha ralannri-r! a. "Srx?r:ially Relail C:rnlem" Z_D .It DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the Sta e of Wash' gton, that a; ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or K posted to or at each of the attached addresses on _1 1' 1 C �1 , 2009. Project Name stiw LIl ke File Number(s) f V 11 � ^� Signature ' Date K:\Intern\DecicirationofDiVributic noiices\Decioration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc/Last printed 12/9/2009 Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8t" Avenue Federal Way 320t" Branch Library - 848 South 320t" Street Subject Site - 29020 Military Road South K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc/Last printed 12/9/2009 '~1 Cry OF � Federal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE STEEL LAKE PLAZA File No. 09-102980-00-SE Description: A new 17,017 square -foot commercial office/retail center with associated site improvements. Applicant: Enrico Galliano, 1837 Camas Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location: 29020 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services Staff Contact: David Lee, Associate Planner, 253-835-2622 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.2 1 C. 03 0(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way C0112prelrensive plan, final staff evaluation for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.060. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for I4 days front the date below. Comments must be submitted by December 23, 2009. You may appeal this determination to Greg Fewins, Director of Community Development Services, at the City of Federal Way (33325 8"' Avenue South, PG Bost 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718) no later than 5:00 p.ni on January 6, 2010. The appeal must be in the form of a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. The appeal letter must make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on December 9, 2009. Doc. I.D. 52230 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EsUBMfTTED 33325 8'h Avenue South L414%4& PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Wa OCT 2 12009 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 Y 1r C1 IF FEDERAL WAY wwwxit offederalwu .c:unt BUILDING DEPT. RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. **Please note: Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Permit Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. ** ANYCHANGES TO DRAWINGS MUST BE CLOUDED. Project Number: Project Name: Project Address: W .ewff" Project Contact: Zt"a f .9 C, MCI 16 Phone: a?0/, RESUBMITTED ITEMS: F-i # of Copies ** Detailed Description of Item J�- r0c� 11v A0#04, M*e-4Ls tf/ 1✓i� �"� j/I ,f 1( FelL 1,111, 196 F Pi �rdA / .C- ** Always submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application. A Resubmittal Requested by: Letter Dated: I 1 (Staff Member OFFICE USE ONL Y RESUB #.• Distribution Date: l d II C2? By' Dept/Div Name # Description Building Planningr PW Fire Other Bulletin #129 — April 21, 2009 Page 1 of 1 UHandouts\Resubmittal Information CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE_TRANSMITTAL RESU'BMITTAL DATE: November 3, 2009 TO: Ann Dower, Development Services Soma Chattopadhyay,Traffic Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: David Lee FILE NUMBER(s): 09-102979-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: STEEL LAKE PLAZA PROJECT ADDRESS: 29020 MILITARY RD S ZONING DISTRICT: BN PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a 18,628 sq/ft commercial center w/64 parking spaces. Contains two parcels 042104-9086 & 042104-9039. LAND USE PERMITS: Preliminary Plat, SEPA MATERIALS RESUBMITTED: See resubmittal cover sheet. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South �'01. RESUBMITTED PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Way OCT 2 7 2009 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 ralway.co www.cii offederaslwa .cam CITY OF FEDERAL WAIF BUILDING DEPT, RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. "Pleasenote.- Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Permit Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. "" ANY CHANGES To DRAWINGS MUST BE CLOUDED. Project Number: Q- g o2 - 0 0- A Project Name: Project Address: �� ]�a� ►� • o, r+�� L M 9,?003 Project Contact: /co ct Phone: 26 -,22 - e RESUBMITTED ITEMS: # of Copies ** Detailed Description of Item ** Always submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application.** Resubmittal Requested by: Letter Dated: /. (Staff Memb6r) Bulletin #129 — April 21, 2009 Page 1 of I k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information 1 d ,ot Report 10/26/2009 19:53 EXISTING LOT 1 PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING STATION 2000 8660.3068 7399.2718 0.0000 S 89046'08" E 284.2700 2001 8659.1602 7683.5395 284.2700 S 00010'04" E 94.5500 2-002 -8564--.6106 7683.8164 378.8200 N 89038'07" W 275.1700 2003 8566.3622 7408.6520 653.9900 N 05042'15" W 94.4100 2004 8660.3047 7399.2684 748.4000 Closure Error Distance> 0.004070 Error Bearing> N 58044'34" E Closure Precision> 1 in 183901.9 Total Distance> 748.4000 LOT AREA: 26355.6 SQ FT OR 0.61 ACRES RESUBMITTED OCT 2 7 Z009 (;I AY BUILDING DEPT. Page 1 of 1 Y Got Report 10/26/2009 19:56 �1 EXISTING LOT 2 PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING STATION 2005 8524.6209 7417.5613 0.0000 S 89038'07" E 275.1700 2006 8522.8693 7692.7257 275.1700 S 00°10'04" E 200.0100 2007 _. 8322.8602 7693.3114� 475.180.0 N 89038'07" W 244.0800 2008 8324.4139 7449.2363 719.2600 RADIUS: 1390.6900 LENGTH: 179.8362 CHORD: 179.7109 DELTA: 07°24'33" CHORD BRG: N 09024'32" W PC-R: N 76053'12" E PT-R: N 84017'45" E RADIUS POINT: 2009 8639.9308,8803.6616 TANGENT: 90.0436 2010 8501.7072 7419.8578 899.0962 N 05042'15" W 23.0300 2011 8524.6231 7417.5688 922.1262 Closure Error Distance> 0.007837 Error Bearing> S 73040109" W Closure Precision> 1 in 117655.7 Total Distance> 922.1262 LOT AREA: 52406.5 SQ FT OR 1.20 ACRES ��'A�e iP►t'�! Page 1 of 1 Lot Report 10/26/2009 19:58 PROPOSED LOT 1 PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING STATION 2012 - 9237.8646 7357.9580 0.0000 S 89046'08" E 284.2700 2013 9236.7180 7642.2256 284.2700 S 00010'04" E 294.5600 2014 -- 18942.1592 7643.0882 578:8300 N 89038'07" W 244.0800 2015 8943.7129 7399.0131 822.9100 RADIUS: 1390.6900 LENGTH: 179.8362 CHORD: 179.7109 DELTA: 07024'33" CHORD BRG: N 09°24'32" W PC-R: N 76053'12" E PT-R: N 84017'45" E RADIUS POINT: 2016 9259.2298,8753.4384 TANGENT: 90.0436 2017 9121.0062 7369.6346 1002.7462 N 05042'15" W 117.4400 2018 9237.8647 7357.9620 1120.1862 Closure Error Distance> 0.004043 Error Bearing> S 88041'38" W Closure Precision> 1 in 277034.6 Total Distance> 1120.1862 LOT AREA: 78761.4 SQ FT OR 1.81 ACRES rQ% Page 1 of 1 -,ot Report 10/26/2009 19:53 EXISTING LOT 1 PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING STATION 2000 8660.3068 7399.2718 0.0000 S 89046'08" E 284.2700 2001 8659.1602 7683.5395 284.2700 S 00010'04" E 94.5500 2-002 -8564-•.6106 7683.8164 378.8200 N 89038'07" W 275.1700 2003 8566.3622 7408.6520 653.9900 N 05042'15" W 94.4100 2004 8660.3047 7399.2684 748.4000 Closure Error Distance> 0.004070 Error Bearing> N 58044'34" E Closure Precision> 1 in 183901.9 Total Distance> 748.4000 LOT AREA: 26355.6 SQ FT OR 0.61 ACRES RESUBMITTED OCT 2 7 2009 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEFT. Page 1 of 1 Got Report 10/26/2009 19:56 EXISTING LOT 2 PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING STATION 2005 8524.6209 7417.5613 0.0000 S 89038'07" E 275.1700 2006 8522.8693 7692.7257 275.1700 S 00010104" E 200.0100 2007 8322.8602 7693.3114 475.180.0 N 89038'07" W 244.0800 2008 8324.4139 7449.2363 719.2600 RADIUS: 1390.6900 LENGTH: 179.8362 CHORD: 179.7109 DELTA: 07024'33" CHORD BRG: N 09024'32" W PC-R: N 76053'12" E PT-R: N 84017145" E RADIUS POINT: 2009 8639.9308,8803.6616 TANGENT: 90.0436 2010 8501.7072 7419.8578 899.0962 N 05042'15" W 23.0300 2011 8524.6231 7417.5688 922.1262 Closure Error Distance> 0.007837 Error Bearing> S 73°40'09" W Closure Precision> 1 in 117655.7 Total Distance> 922.1262 LOT AREA: 52406.5 SQ FT OR 1.20 ACRES Page 1 of 1 Got Report. '� ,, 10/26/2009 19:58 PROPOSED LOT 1 PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING FASTING STATION 2012 9237.8646 7357.9580 0.0000 S 89°46'08" E 284.2700 2013 9236.7180 7642.2256 284.2700 S 00010'04" E 294.5600 2-014 8942.1592 7643.0882 578:8300 N 89038'07" W 244.0800 2015 8943.7129 7399.0131 822.9100 RADIUS: 1390.6900 LENGTH: 179.8362 CHORD: 179.7109 DELTA: 07°24'33" CHORD BRG: N 09024'32" W PC-R: N 76053'12" E PT-R: N 84017'45" E RADIUS POINT: 2016 9259.2298,8753.4384 TANGENT: 90.043E 2017 9121.0062 7369.6346 1002.7462 N 05042'15" W 117.4400 2018 9237.8647 7357.9620 1120.1862 Closure Error Distance> 0.004043 Error Bearing> S 88041'38" W Closure Precision> 1 in 277034.E Total Distance> 1120.1862 LOT AREA: 78761.4 SQ FT OR 1.81 ACRES A L Page 1 of 1 ,ot Report 10/26/2009 19:53 EXISTING LOT 1 PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING STATION 2000 8660.3068 7399.2718 0.0000 S 89°46'08" E 284.2700 2001 8659.1602 7683.5395 284.2700 S 00010104" E 94.5500 2-002 -8564-•.6106 7683.8164 378.8200 N 89038'07" W 275.1700 2003 8566.3622 7408.6520 653.9900 N 05042'15" W 94.4100 2004 8660.3047 7399.2684 748.4000 Closure Error Distance> 0.004070 Error Bearing> N 58044134" E Closure Precision> 1 in 183901.9 Total Distance> 748.4000 LOT AREA: 26355.6 SQ FT OR 0.61 ACRES Page 1 of 1 RESUBM117ED OCT 2 7 2009 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. S Lot Report ,--) 10/2 6/2 009 19:56 EXISTING LOT 2 'PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING STATION 2005 8524.6209 7417.5613 0.0000 S 89038'07" E 275.1700 2006 8522.8693 7692.7257 275.1700 S 00010'04" E 200.0100 2007 1 8322.8602 7693.3114 475.180.0 N 89°38'07" W 244.0800 2008 8324.4139 7449.2363 719.2600 RADIUS: 1390.6900 LENGTH: 179.8362 CHORD: 179.7109 DELTA: 07024'33" CHORD BRG: N 09024'32" W PC-R: N 76°53'12" E PT-R: N 84°17'45" E RADIUS POINT: 2009 8639.9308,8803.6616 TANGENT: 90.0436 2010 8501.7072 7419.8578 899.0962 N 05042'15" W 23.0300 2011 8524.6231 7417.5688 922.1262 Closure Error Distance> 0.007837 Error Bearing> S 73040109" W Closure Precision> 1 in 117655.7 Total Distance> 922.1262 LOT AREA: 52406.5 SQ FT OR 1.20 ACRES �r Page 1 of 1 Lot Report 10/26/2009 19:58 PROPOSED LOT 1 PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING STATION 2012 9237.8646 7357.9580 0.0000 S 89046'08" E 284.2700 2013 9236.7180 7642.2256 284.2700 S 00010'04" E 294.5600 2014 R942.1592 7643.0882 578:8300 N 89038'07" W 244.0800 2015 8943.7129 7399.0131 822.9100 RADIUS: 1390.6900 LENGTH: 179.8362 CHORD: 179.7109 DELTA: 07°24'33" CHORD BRG: N 09024'32" W PC-R: N 76°53'12" E PT-R: N 84017'45" E RADIUS POINT: 2016 9259.2298,8753.4384 TANGENT: 90.0436 2017 9121.0062 7369.6346 1002.7462 N 05042'15" W 117.4400 2018 9237.8647 7357.9620 1120.1862 Closure Error Distance> 0.004043 Error Bearing> S 88041'38" W Closure Precision> 1 in 277034.6 Total Distance> 1120.1862 LOT AREA: 78761.4 SQ FT OR 1.81 ACRES Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM Public Works Department DATE: 9/22/09 TO: David Lee FROM: Ann Dower: SUBJECT: STEEL LAKE PLAZA - (09-102982-00-SU) 29020 MILITARY RD S; Public Works Review 1. Provide lot closure calculations. 2. Show existing and proposed lot areas. 3. All locatable easements must be shown. All non -locatable easements must be noted on the Boundary Line Adjustment map. 4. Please note that any easements located within the property to be dedicated as part of the project must be relinquished. The applicant is responsible for obtaining relinquishments and is advised to begin this process as soon as possible. MEMORANDUM Public Works Department DATE: 9/21/09 TO: David Lee FROM: Ann Dower eAD SUBJECT: STEEL LAKE PLAZA - (09-102979-00-UP) 29020 MILITARY RD S; Technical Review Plans 1. Tapers are required at both ends of the pavement widening. Taper length shall be Speed limit (mph) : 1 (WSDOT standards; e.g. 40 mph = 40:1). 2. Show conceptual street light locations on the plan view. Spacing would be a maximum of 175'. TIR 3. Please provide a description of the condition of each element of the downstream system and describe existing and predicted problems. Describe the "downstream natural drainage location" (is it a wetland, a ditch,etc.?) in greater detail and explain where it ultimately discharges. 4. Explain the small pothole and pipes shown on the east side of the site. Where do these drain from and to, and what will happen to that runoff when the site is developed? DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 Nycl Jd,G13LvttcC.ierolwaY.c:Of it DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the Sta e of Washington, hat a: Pq Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or posted to or at each of the attached addresses on l 2009. Project Name Sleell LA Vf, P 1 File Number(s) O q —102-61 Z 1 - GO— U Signature �� 1 Date c K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Siies.doc/Last printed 9/2/2009 1:02:33 PM Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way 320th Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street Subject Site - 29020 Military Road South KAIntern\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc/Last printed 9/2/2009 1:02:33 PM f:ET'i" i3F Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Steel Lake Plaza Description: A 17,017 square foot commercial office/retail center with associated site improvements. Location: 29020 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA Applicant: Rico Galliano, 1837 Camas Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056 Agent: David Thorstad, 906 South 289`h Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 Owner: Same as Applicant Date Application Received: August 4, 2009 Date Determined Complete: August 27, 2009 Date of Notice of Application: September 2, 2009 Comment Deadline: 5 p.m., September 16, 2009 Permits Required: Land Use Process III (09-102979-00-UP) SEPA Determination: SEPA File #09-102980-00-SE Other Permits Known at this Time and not Included in this Application: Building Permit / Engineering Approval Relevant Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist, Stormwater/Drainage Technical Information Report (TIR) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations to be used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Any person may submit written comments on the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community Development Services by 5:00 p.m. on September 16, 2009. Details of appeal procedures for the requested environmental decision will be included with the written decision. Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including the FWRC environmental and zoning codes; surface and stormwater management codes; King County Road Standards; and King County Surface Water Design Manual. City Contact: Associate Planner David Lee, 253-835-2622 The official file is available for public review at the City of Federal Way, Department of Community Development Services (33325 8t' Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Published in the Federal Way Mirror on September 2, 2009. File N09-102979-00-UP Doc. I.D. 51307 ®� MASTER Lt_ D USE APPLICATION ��+ `I ED DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES {w s3325 8`h Avenue South CITY OF ti-. _"'' = 2�� PO Box 9718 Wa A � � Q Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal ycl-f-Y 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 OF FEDERAL WAY wwwxityoffederalway.com ADS / oq- 10Z� -rim g-l-VOCI APPLICATION NO(S) Date Project Name Property Address, Parcel Number(s) Project Descriptia PT . F' A SF PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone k Laiid Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director=s Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) —,K,_ Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI X SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information Zoning Designation Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type ��onstruction Type Applicant Address: kMol City/State:Zip: Phone: 1 Fax: r , Email: rtq/-O�, C;> �.-�.rr"[1. , t► Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: VM i t7 Address: City/State:I '24f I r h Zip: tTV77Z Phone: � 1 " , 1 Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: elm AT71,_Vmf Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Bulletin #003 —August 18, 2004 Page 1 of I k:\1landouts\Master Land Use Application CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: TO FROM: FOR DRC MTG. ON: FILE NUMBER(S): RELATED FILE NOS.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: August 10, 2009 - D C"I Ann Dower, Development Services Manager) Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Offici Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue Lindsey Tiroux, Public Safety Officer David Lee Internal Completeness: August 27, 2009 09-102979-00-UP / 09-102982-00-SU (ESP) / 09-102980-00-SE None STEEL LAKE PLAZA 29020 MILITARY RD S ZONING DISTRICT: BN PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a 18,628 sq/ft commercial center w/64 parking spaces. Contains two parcels 042104-9086 & 042104-9039. LAND USE PERMITS: SEPA, UP III, Binding Site Plan PROJECT CONTACT: DAVID THORSTAD 406289TH ST MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Preliminary Site Conceptual Drawing SEPA Checklist Ph. 253-896-1011 Fx. 253-896-2633 Steel Lake Plaza, LLC PO Box 3437 Renton, WA 98056 (206)229-8998 Attn: Mr. Enrico V. Galliano GeoResources, LLC 5007 Paeffic Hwy. E, Suite 20 Fife, Washington 98424 June 30, 2009 Geotechnical Design Report Proposed Commercial Development 29020 & 29026 Military Road South Federal Way, Washington PN: 0421049039 & 0421049086 Job: SteelLakePlaza.MilitaryRd.GR INTRODUCTION This geotechnical report presents the results of our subsurface explorations for the proposed commercial development to be constructed at 29020 and 29026 Military Road South in Federal Way, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the attached Site Vicinity Map, Figure 1. Our understanding of the project is based on our discussions with you and Brett Allen at Contour Engineering, our review of the provided plans, our June 12, 2009 site visit, and our experience in the area. We understand that you propose to construct a series of new commercial buildings on the site. We anticipate that the buildings will be conventional wood - framed structures supported on spread and continuous foundations. SCOPE The purpose of our services was to evaluate the surface and subsurface conditions at the site as a basis for developing and providing geotechnical recommendations and design criteria for the proposed commercial development. Specifically, our scope of services for the project included the following: 1. Visiting the site and conducting a geologic reconnaissance to assess the site's soil, .groundwater and slope conditions. 2. Exploring the subsurface conditions across the proposed building by excavating eight test pits at selected locations across the site. 3. Addressing the appropriate geotechnical regulatory requirements for the proposed site development. 4. Providing geotechnical recommendations for site grading including site preparation, subgrade preparation, fill placement criteria, suitability of on -site soils for use as structural fill, temporary and permanent cut and fill slopes, and drainage and erosion control measures. 5. Providing recommendations and design criteria for conventional foundation and floor slab support, including allowable bearing capacity, subgrade modulus, lateral resistance values and estimates of settlement. 6. Providing recommendations and design criteria for the design of conventional subgrade/retaining walls, including backfill and drainage requirements, lateral design SteelLakePlaza. MiliitaryRd.GR June 30,2009 Page 2 loads, and lateral resistance values. 7. Providing appropriate IBC seismic design parameters for the proposed structures. Our services were originally outlined in our June 9, 2009 Geotechnical Engineering Proposal. We received authorization to proceed with our scope of services singed by Enrico Galliano, president of Steel Lake Plaza, LLC on June 9, 2009. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The project consists of two contiguous tax parcels located at 29020 and 29026 Military Road South in Federal Way, Washington. When combined the site is rectangular in shape, measures approximately 284 to 244 feet east to west by 295 feet north to south. The north portion of the site is currently developed with remnants of a daylight basement foundation, septic tank, and abandoned water meter. The remainder of the site is undeveloped. The site is bounded by existing single family residences on the north and south, multifamily development on the east, and by Military Road and Commercial development on the west. The site is located on the Federal Way glacial upland area. From Military Road, the site is flat to gently sloping for approx 50 linear feet. East of this area, the ground surface slopes down between 25 to 50 percent with approximately 20 feet of vertical relief. The south portion of the site slopes down a 30 foot wide bench at 20 to 30 percent. This bench appears to be an old fill slope. The north portion of the site also slopes down between 15 to 25 percent. These slopes form a "U" which is open and gently sloping to the east for the remainder of the site. An excavated stormwater pond with inlet pipes is located in the east portion of the site. Total topographic relief across the site is on the order of 25 feet. The existing and proposed site configuration, along with areas of 15 to 25, 25 to 39 percent and greater than 40 percent slopes are shown on the attached Site Plan, Figure 2. Vegetation on the site consists of isolated Alder trees with a dense understory of invasive Himalayan blackberry bushes. No surface water or seepage was observed at the time of our site visit_ No evidence of erosion, soil movement, landslide activity or deep-seated slope instability was observed at the site or the adjacent areas at the time of our site visit. Site Soils The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey for King County maps the soils in the area of the site as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgB & AgC). The Alderwood soils are typically derived from sandy glacial till that form on 0 to 6 and 6 to 15 percent slopes and are listed as having a "slight" or "moderate" erosion hazard, respectively. A copy of the SCS map for the site vicinity is attached as Figure 3. We observed no evidence of surficial erosion at the site during our reconnaissance. Site Geology The Geologic Map of the Poverty Bay 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Washington, Booth, D.B., Waldron, H.H., and Troost, K.G., 2003 indicates the site underlain by glacial till (Qgt). These soils are typically overlain by a veneer of recessional outwash (Ctvr). These glacial soils were deposited during the most recent Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation, approximately 12,000 to 15,000 years ago. The recessional outwash soils consist of a poorly sorted, lightly stratified mixture of sand and gravel that may contain localized deposits of clay and silt, that were deposited by meltwater streams emanating from the retreating ice mass, respectively. The glacial till consists of a heterogeneous mixture of clay, silt, sand, and gravel that was deposited at the base of the prehistoric continental glacial ice mass and was subsequently over -ridden. As such, the glacial till is considered overconsolidated and exhibit high strength Stee1LakeP1aza.Mi1itaryRd.GR June 30, 2009 Page 3 and low compressibility characteristics, where as the recessional outwash deposits are considered normally consolidated and offer moderate strength characteristics. An excerpt of the above referenced map is included as Figure 4. No landslides or landslide debris are mapped on or near the vicinity of the site. Subsurface Explorations On June 12, 2009 we explored subsurface conditions at the site by monitoring the excavation of eight test pits. The test pits were excavated by a small track mounted excavator operated by a licensed earthwork contractor. The test pits extended to depths ranging from 10 to 12 feet below existing ground surface. The test pits were located in the field by our representative by pacing from existing site features such as property comers and adjacent roadways. The approximate location of the test pits are indicated on the attached Site Plan as Figure 2. A field geologist from our office continuously monitored the excavations, maintained logs of the subsurface conditions encountered in each test pit, obtained representative soil samples, and observed pertinent site features. Representative soil samples obtained from the test pits were placed in sealed plastic bags and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing, as deemed appropriate. Subsurface Conditions Our test pits encountered variable subsurface conditions that somewhat confirmed the mapped stratigraphy. Above the surficial native soils, test pits TP-2, TP-4, TP-5, TP-7, and TP-8 encountered 1'12 to 6 feet of loose to medium dense silty sand with gravel and debris, interpreted to be old fill material. The native stratigraphy across the site, as observed in our test pits, consisted of'/ to 1'/ feet of topsoil overlying medium stiff mottled silt with varying amounts of sand. We interpret these soils to represent weathered recessional lacustrine /outwash deposits. Test pit TP-1 encountered medium dense sand that became saturated at depth. At depths of 4 to 7'/ feet, we observed very dense silty sand and hard silt. We interpret these soils to represent glacial till. The soils encountered were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) described on Figure 5. The test pit logs are included as Figures 6a to 6c. Groundwater Conditions Slow groundwater seepage was observed in test pit TP-1 at depths of 6142to 8 feet at the time of excavation. This seepage was observed within a sand lens atop the cemented weathered till soils, representing a perched groundwater condition. The remaining test pits (TP-2 through TP-8) encountered silty soil atop the dense, weathered till. No groundwater was observed in any other explorations (TP-2 through TP-8) at the time of our site visit. Perched groundwater typically develops when1he vertical infiltration of precipitation through a more permeable soil is slowed at depth by a deeper, less permeable soil type. We expect that perched groundwater may develop seasonally atop the deeper and denser glacial till. Based on the observed mottling and nature of the near surface soils, we anticipate fluctuations in the local groundwater levels will occur in response to precipitation patterns, off -site construction activities, and site utilization. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Erosion Section 18-28 in the City of Federal Way municipal code defines erosion hazard areas as those areas having a "severe" or "very severe" erosion hazard due to natural agents such as wind, rain, splash, frost action or stream flow. SteelLakeftza.Mli taryRd.GR June 30, 2009 Page 4 Landslide Hazard Areas per City of Federal Way Chapter 18-28 The City of Federal Way municipal code Chapter 18 section 28 defines landslide hazard areas as those areas potentially subject to episodic downslope movement of a mass of soil or rock including but not limited to the following areas: a. Any area with a combination of: 1. Slopes greater than 15 percent; 2. Permeable sediment overlying a relatively impermeable sediment or bedrock; 3. Springs or groundwater seeps. b. Any area which has shown movement during the Holocene epoch, from 10,000 years ago to the present, or which is underlain by mass wastage debris of that epoch. c. Areas potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision, stream bank erosion, and undercutting by wave action. d. Areas located in a canyon or on an active alluvial fan, presently or potentially subject to inundation by debris flows or catastrophic flooding. e. Areas that have a "severe" limitation for building site development because of slope conditions, according to the USDA SCS. f. Those areas mapped as Class U (Unstable), Uos (Unstable old slides), and Urs (unstable recent slides) by the Department of Ecology. g. Slopes having a gradient steeper than 80 percent subject to rock fall during seismic shaking. Steep Slope The Federal Way City Code Section 18-28 defines steep slope hazard areas as "those areas with a slope of 40 percent or greater and with a vertical relief of 10 or more feet, a vertical rise of 10 feet or more for every 25 feet of horizontal distance. A slope is delineated by established its toe and top and measured by averaging the inclination over at least 10 feet of vertical relief." Seismic The City of Federal Way Municipal Code, Chapter 18-28 defines seismic hazard areas as those areas subject to severe risk of earthquake damage as a result of seismically induced ground shaking, slope failure, settlement or soil liquefaction, or surface faulting. These conditions occur in areas underlain by cohesionless soils of low density usually in association with a shallow groundwater table. CONCLUSIONS Based on our site observations and data review, our subsurface explorations and our engineering analysis, it is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. It is also our opinion that a geologic hazard area does not exist on or within 300 feet of the site. The structures may be supported on new conventional spread footings or floor slabs bearing on competent native soils or on structural fill placed above these native soils. The older fill material may be reused provided the soils are overexcavated, the large debris is removed, and the fill material is placed as compacted structural fill. The native soils at the site are moisture sensitive and contain a relatively high percentage of fines (silt and clay -size particles), which will make them difficult to compact as structural fill in wet weather conditions. We understand that grading at the site will consist of a series of fills keyed into the steeper SteelLakePlaza.MiliiaryRd.GR June 30, 2009 Page 5 slopes to provide access to the site. Additional grading will include excavating the footings for the proposed buildings and site utilities. If grading activities will take place during the winter season, the owner should be prepared to import free -draining granular material for use as structural fill and backfill. Proper surface drainage and erosion control measures will reduce the risk for future erosion and slope instability at the site. Provided the recommendations contained herein are included in the plans; the proposed development should have minimal impacts to the site and adjacent properties. Erosion The USDA NRCS has mapped the site soils as Alderwood soils having "slight" or "moderate" erosion hazards due to rainfall, depending on inclinations. Therefore, according to the City of Federal Way, the site is not within an erosion hazard area. Potential erosion hazards can be mitigated by applying proper erosion and sediment control measures prior to and during construction. Landslide Hazard Areas per City of Federal Way Chapter 18-28 According to the above listed criteria, the site has one of the indicators of a potential landslide hazard area (building site limitation for small commercial buildings "severe: slope"). No other landslide hazard indicators or evidence of landslide activity was observed on the site. Steep Slope Based on our observations during our site reconnaissance and exploration, the site does have areas sloping greater than 40 percent with a vertical height of at least 10 feet along the west portion of the site. Therefore, the west portion of the site would be classified as a steep. slope. Recommended Setback The City of Federal Way building department may require a building setback in accordance with IBC (International Building Code) standard requirements. IBC section 1805 requires a building setback from slopes that are steeper than 31-11:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) with greater than 10 feet of vertical height unless evaluated and reduced, and/or a structural setback is provided, by a licensed geotechnical engineer. The setback distance is calculated based on the vertical height of the slope. The typical IBC setback from the top of the slope equals one third the height of the slope while a setback from the toe of the slope equals one half the height of the slope. Based on our site observations, in accordance with IBC guidelines, we recommend a setback distance of H/3 for slopes greater than 10 feet in height to a maximum of 7 feet from slopes greater than 33 percent. Where this setback distance cannot be met, the foundation elements of the structure can be extended vertically to meet the horizontal setback distance. Where the foundation is extended vertically, we recommend that the setback be measured horizontally from the lower outside edge of the foundation element to the face of the slope. This structural setback is based on the foundation elements extending to the dense to very dense or hard native soils or structural fill. Subgrade soil conditions should be evaluated by a geotechnical professional prior to placement of the foundation forms. Seismic Hazards Based on our observation and the subsurface units mapped at the site, we interpret the structural site conditions to correspond to a seismic Site Class "C" in accordance with Table 1613.5.2 in the 2006 IBC (International Building Code) documents. This is based an the likely range of equivalent SPT (Standard Penetration Test) blow counts for the soil types Steel LakePIaza. MIIItaryRd.GR June 30, 2009 Page 6 observed in the site area. These conditions were assumed to be representative for the conditions based on our experience in the vicinity of the site. Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in pore water pressure. The increase in pore water pressure is induced by seismic vibrations. Liquefaction mainly affects geologically recent deposits of loose, fine-grained sands that are below the groundwater table. Based on the density and nature of the glacial soils observed on the site, it is our opinion that the risk for liquefaction to occur at this site during an earthquake is negligible. Provided the design criteria listed below are followed, the proposed structure will have no greater seismic risk damage than other appropriately designed structures in the Puget Sound area. EARTHWORK Site Preparation Areas to be graded should be cleared of deleterious matter including any existing structures, foundations, abandoned utility lines, debris and vegetation. The portions of the site to be graded that are still covered with vegetation should be stripped of any forest duff and organic -laden soils. These materials can be stockpiled and later used for erosion control. Material that cannot be utilized on site should be removed from the site. Where placement of fill material is required, the stripped/exposed subgrade areas should be compacted to a firm and unyielding surface and evaluated prior to placement of any fill material. The older fill material was encountered in a loose to medium dense condition. These soils may be reused provided the soils are overexcavated, the large debris is removed and the fill material is placed as compacted structural fill. Excavations for debris removal should be backfilled with structural fill compacted to the densities described in the "Structural Fill" section of this report. We recommend that a member of our staff evaluate the exposed subgrade conditions after removal of vegetation and topsoil stripping is completed and prior to placement of structural fill. The exposed subgrade soil should be proof -rolled with heavy rubber -tired equipment during dry weather or probed with a 1/2-inch-diameter steel rod during wet weather conditions. Any soft, loose or otherwise unsuitable areas delineated during proof -rolling or probing should be recompacted, if practical, or over -excavated and replaced with structural fill, based on the recommendations of our site representative. The areas of old fill material should be evaluated during grading operations to determine if they need mitigation; recompaction or removal. Structural Fill All material placed as fill associated with mass grading, as utility trench backfill, under building areas, or under roadways should be placed as structural fill. The structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts of appropriate thickness to allow adequate and uniform compaction of each lift. Fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD (maximum dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557). The older fill should be over - excavated and placed as compacted structural fill. The appropriate lift thickness will depend on the fill characteristics and compaction equipment used. We recommend that the appropriate lift thickness be evaluated by our field representative during construction. We recommend that our representative be present during site grading activities to observe the work and perform field density tests. The suitability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines (material passing US No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult to achieve. During wet weather, we recommend Steel LakePlaza. MilitaryRd.GR June 30, 2009 Page 7 use of well -graded sand and gravel with less than 5 percent (by weight) passing the US No. 200 sieve based on that fraction passing the 3/4-inch sieve, such as Gravel Backfill for Walls (9-03.12(2)). If prolonged dry weather prevails during the earthwork and foundation installation phase of construction, higher fines content (up to 10 to 12 percent) will be acceptable. Material placed for structural fill should be free of debris, organic matter, trash and cobbles greater than 6-inches in diameter. The moisture content of the fill material should be adjusted as necessary for proper compaction. Suitability of On -Site Materials as Fill During dry weather construction, any non -organic on -site soil may be considered for use as structural fill; provided it meets the criteria described above in the structural fill section and can be compacted as recommended. If the soil material is over -optimum in moisture content when excavated, it will be necessary to aerate or dry the soil prior to placement as structural fill. The native weathered lacustrine and mottled till material consist of silts with variable amounts of sand. These soils are not suitable for use as structural fill during wet weather months. The native glacial till soils in the site generally consisted of silty gravel with fine sand. These soils are generally comparable to common borrow" material and will be suitable for use as structural fill provided the moisture content is maintained within 4 percent of the optimum moisture level. However, due to the high fines content, the till soils encountered across the site will likely be unsuitable during extended periods of wet weather or where significant groundwater seepage occurs. We recommend that completed graded -areas be restricted from traffic or protected prior to wet weather conditions. The graded areas may be protected by paving, placing asphalt -treated base, a layer of free -draining material such as pit run sand and gravel or clean crushed rock material containing less than 5 percent fines, or some combination of the above. Temporary Excavations All job site safety issues and precautions are the responsibility of the contractor providing services/work. The following cutffill slope guidelines are provided for planning purposes only. Temporary cut slopes will likely be necessary during grading operations or utility installation. All excavations at the site associated with confined spaces, such as utility trenches and retaining walls, must be completed in accordance with local, state, or federal requirements. Based on current Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA, WAC 296-155-66401) regulations, the shallow upper soils on the site would be classified as Type C soils and the very dense, cemented, glacial till soils would be classified as Type A soils. According to WISHA, for temporary excavations of less than 20 feet in depth, the side slopes in Type A soils should be laid back at a slope inclination of %H:1 V (Horizontal: Vertical) and Type C soils should be laid back at a slope inclination of 1.511:1 V or flatter from the toe to the top of the slope. It should be recognized that slopes of this nature do ravel and require occasional maintenance. All exposed slope faces should be covered with a durable reinforced plastic membrane, jute matting, or other erosion control mats during construction to prevent slope raveling and rutting during periods of precipitation. These guidelines assume that all surface loads are kept at a minimum distance of at least one half the depth of the cut away from the top of the slope and that significant seepage is not present on the slope face. Flatter cut slopes will be necessary where significant raveling or seepage occurs, or if construction materials will be stockpiled along the slope crest. Where it is not feasible to slope the site soils back at these inclinations, a retaining structure should be considered. Where retaining structures are greater than 4-feet in height SteelLakePlaza. MllitaryRd. G R June 30, 2009 Page 8 (bottom of footing to top of structure) or have slopes of greater than 15 percent above them, they should be engineered. This information is provided solely for the benefit of the owner and other design consultants, and should not be construed to imply that GeoResources assumes responsibility for job site safety. It is understood that job site safety is the sole responsibility of the project contractor. FOUNDATIONS Foundation Support Based on the subsurface soil conditions encountered across the site, we recommend that spread footings for the new structures be founded on dense or hard native glacial till soils or on structural fill that extends to suitable native soils. The soil at the base of the footing excavations should be disturbed as little as possible. All loose, soft or unsuitable material should be removed or recompacted, as appropriate. A representative from our firm should observe the foundation excavations to determine if suitable bearing surfaces have been prepared, particularly in the areas where the foundation will be situated on fill material. We recommend a minimum width of 2 feet for isolated footings and at least 16 inches for continuous wall footings. All footing elements should be embedded at least 18 inches below grade for frost protection. Footings founded as described above can be designed using an allowable soil bearing capacity of 2,500 psf (pounds per square foot) for combined dead and long-term live loads. The weight of the footing and any overlying backfill may be neglected. The allowable bearing value may be increased by one-third for transient loads such as those induced by seismic events or wind loads. Lateral loads may be resisted by friction on the base of footings and floor slabs and as passive pressure on the sides of footings. We recommend that an allowable coefficient of friction of 0.35 be used to calculate friction between the concrete and the underlying soil. Passive pressure may be determined using an allowable equivalent fluid density of 300 pcf (pounds per cubic foot). Factors of safety have been applied to these values. We estimate that settlements of footings designed and constructed as recommended will be less than 1 inch, for the anticipated load conditions, with differential settlements between comparably loaded footings of 112 inch or less. Most of the settlements should occur essentially as loads are being applied. However, disturbance of the foundation subgrade during construction could result in larger settlements than predicted. Subgrade or Retaining Walls Based on existing topography, we anticipate the proposed development may include a retaining wall configuration. The lateral pressures acting on subgrade or retaining walls will depend upon the nature and density of the soil behind the wall. It is also dependent upon the presence or absence of hydrostatic pressure. If the walls are backfilled with granular well - drained soil, the design active pressure may be taken as 35 pcf (equivalent fluid density). This design value assumes a level backslope and drained conditions as described below. Positive drainage which controls the development of hydrostatic pressure can be accomplished by placing a zone of coarse sand and gravel behind the walls. The granular drainage material should contain less than 5 percent fines. The drainage zone should extend horizontally at least 18 inches from the back of the wall. The drainage zone should also extend from the base of the wall to within 1 foot of the top of the wall. The drainage zone should be compacted to approximately 90 percent of the MDD. Over -compaction should be avoided as this can lead to excessive lateral pressures. A perforated PVC pipe with a minimum diameter of 4 inches should be placed in the drainage zone along the base of the wall to direct accumulated water to an appropriate SteelLakePlaza.MilitaryRd.G R June 30, 2009 Page 9 discharge location. We recommend that a nonwoven geotextile filter fabric be placed between the drainage material and the remaining wall backfill to reduce silt migration into the drainage zone. The infiltration of silt into the drainage zone can, with time, reduce the permeability of the granular material. The filter fabric should be placed such that it fully separates the drainage material and the backfill, and should be extended over the top of the drainage zone. Lateral loads may be resisted by friction on the base of footings and as passive pressure on the sides of footings and the buried portion of the wall, as described in the "Foundation Support" section. We recommend that an allowable coefficient of friction of 0.35 be used to calculate friction between the concrete and the underlying soil. Passive pressure may be determined using an allowable equivalent fluid density of 300 pcf (pounds per cubic foot). Factors of safety have been applied to these values. Floor Slab Support Slabs -on -grade, if constructed, should be supported on the medium dense native soils or on structural fill prepared as described above. Any areas of old fill material should be evaluated during grading activity for suitability of structural support. Areas of significant organic debris should be removed. We recommend that floor slabs be directly underlain by a capillary break material with minimum 6-inch thickness of coarse sand, pea gravel, or gravel containing less than 3 percent fines. The drainage material should be placed in one lift and compacted to an unyielding condition. A synthetic vapor barrier is recommended to control moisture migration through the slabs. This is of particular importance where the foundation elements are underlain by the silty till or lake sediments, or where moisture migration through the slab is an issue, such as where adhesives are used to anchor carpet or tile to the slab. A subgrade modulus of 400 kcf (kips per cubic foot) may be used for floor slab design. We estimate that settlement of the floor slabs designed and constructed as recommended, will be 1/2 inch or less over a span of 50 feet. PAVEMENT SUBGRADES Pavement subgrade areas should be prepared as previously described in the "Site Preparation" section of this report. The prepared subgrade should be evaluated by proof - rolling with a fully -loaded dump truck or equivalent point load equipment. Soft, loose or wet areas that are disclosed should be recompacted or removed, as appropriate. Over -excavated areas should be backfilled with compacted structural fill and sub -base material. Erosion Control Erosion protection measures will need to be in place prior to starting grading activity on the site. Erosion hazards can be mitigated by applying Best management Practices (BMP's) outlined in the Washington State Department of Ecology's (DOE) Stormwater Management Manua! for Western Washington. Site Drainage All ground surfaces, pavements and sidewalks at the site should be carefully graded to ensure positive drainage away from all structures and property lines. Surface water runoff from the roof area, driveways, perimeter footing drains, and wall drains, should be collected, tightlined, and conveyed to an appropriate discharge point. Based on the soils encountered and perched groundwater observed in our test pit TP-1, it is our opinion that the infiltration of stormwater at the site is not feasible. We therefore recommend that the collected stormwater from the site be detained and released to an appropriate location in accordance with the appropriate regulatory guidelines. Stee (Lake Plaza.Mil ftaryRd.GR June 30, 2009 Page 10 LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for Steel Lake Plaza, LLC and members of the design team for use in evaluating a portion of this project. The data used in preparing this report and this report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes only. Our report, conclusions and interpretations are based on data from others and limited site reconnaissance, and should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Variations in subsurface conditions are possible between the explorations and may also occur with time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation should be provided by our firm during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. The scope of our services does not include services related to environmental remediation and construction safety precautions. Our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. If there are any changes in the loads, grades, locations, configurations or type of facilities to be constructed, the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report may not be fully applicable. If such changes are made, we should be given the opportunity to review our recommendations and provide written modifications or verifications, as appropriate. We have appreciated working for you on this project. Please do not hesitate to call at your earliest convenience if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully submitted, GeoResources, LLC Principal BPB:WGC:rmh Doc ID: SteelLakePlaza.MllitaryRd.GR Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Site Plan Figure 3: SCS Soil Survey Figure 4: USGS Geology Map Figure 5: Unified Soil classification System Figures 6a, 6b, &ft Test Pit logs G Principal x t ae ►3r Lref Saurrll � ' � �� !{� 5aal�rrN Pwrh ix `Jl -.Federal Way o , 11 wa ryn,v Sledlskc ,. rvtiWlik! .F �. 4Jhllr•• "'t�wr�+lr.f=� IE i{ L.i}}}rsm u, oink", _ y�+7s+rJlta►++1r__ �l :irTinyl -_--_ _ _ _ --.-_- -' GedResourcos, LLC 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 25M96-1011 Fax: 253-896-2633 ent �1*^ l�Il7it n `Srar lwRa� Y +�+7i1 ' .�•^• '�rr� asamR� e�`'a�wc+• l :Ain Jl � "� ? � � - ��_� R� • b S 02?sYJ PL:.' I .: non+,» c r j r Auburn ,i%r as War r Approximate Site Location Not to Scale Site Vicinity. Map Proposed Steel Lake Plaza 29020 Military Road Federal Way, Washington, Washington DoeID: SteelLekePleze.MHiteryRd.SVM I June 2009 Figure 1 f y_+• : __ _ — - -ram_. WAV e Coln� i�ii =�3y E�0�7A`Se aAea`e eA$� — — - —°"MI.= �ma u. U � w no c N � o w a U Lo m W rn $ 4. uq • s fA Approximate Site Location SCS Soil Type SCS W Soil Name Parent Material Slopes In perceng j Erosion Hazard AgB _ Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Glacial Till 0 to 6 Slight AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy loam Glacial Till 6 to 15 Moderate AmB Arents, Alderwood material Glacial Till 0 to 6 Slight AmB Arents, Alderwood material Glacial Till 6 to 15 Moderate Or Orcas peat Alluvium & Decomposing - None Organics GeoResources, LLC 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Fax: 253-896-2633 Not to Scale NRCS Soils Map Proposed Steel Lake Plaza 29020 Military Road Federal Way. Washington, Washi it ��r� .1 '•� ` I f �_ __... jo ... • � � } � i � ram' � r � r .�.� 1 or wr fir �'•r'� r .. �.1. �pp......,,.�. .' -t1 i..,� r" .••j i —�• f Zry�# �1`_ llli if It � �1 i i � , � ate•= � .- Nkf Approximate Site Location An excerpt from the Geologic Map of the Poverty Bay 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Washington, Booth, D.B., Waldron, H.H., and Troost, K.G., 2003 GeoResources, LLC 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Fax: 253-896-2633 Not to Scale USGS Geologic Map Proposed Steel Lake Plaza 29020 Military Road Federal Way, Washington, Washington DocIU: SteelLakePI=a.MiIItar rRd.USGS June 2009 Figure 4 COARSE GRAINED SOILS More than 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve FINE GRAINED SOILS More than 5016 Passes No. 200 Sieve SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP GROUP NAME SYMBOL WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL CLEAN GW GRAVEL GRAVEL GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL More than 50% - - - of Coarse Fraction Retained on No. 4 Sieve GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SAND SP POORLY -GRADED SAND More than 50% Of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND Passes WITH FINES No, 4 Sieve SC CLAYEY SAND SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY Liquid Limit Less than 50 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY Liquid Limit 50 or more ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-90. 3. Description of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and or test data. GeoResources, LLC 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Fax: 253-896-2633 SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: Dry- Absence of moisture, dry to the touch Moist- Damp, but no visible water Wet Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table Soil Classification System Proposed Steel Lake Plaza 29020 Military Road Federal Way, Washington, Washingto JOB SteelLakePlaza.MilitaryRd June 2009 Test Pit TP-1 Location: NE comer of site -60 feet west of fence line. Depth (ft) Soil Type Soil Description _ 0 - 9 SM Brown silty SAND with surficial roots (loose to medium dense, moist) 1 - 2'/ ML Tan mottled sandy SILT with gravel (stiff, moist) 2% - 4 ML Gray mottled sandy SILT with gravel (stiff, moist) 4 - 7 SP Gray SAND with gravel, occasional cobbles (medium dense, moist increasing to wet) 7 - 81A SM Gray mottled silty SAND with gravel, cemented (dense, moist to wet) (Weathered Till) 8'/2 - 12 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel, cemented (dense to very dense, moist) increasing silt at depth (Glacial Till) Terminated at 12 feet below ground surface due to roots. No caving observed. Moderate groundwater seepage observed (perched) at depths of 7 to 8 feet. Test Pit TP-2 Location: West of existing detention pond Denth (ft) Sail Tvoe Soil Description 0 - 2% SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, numerous roots (loose to medium dense, moist) (steel corrugated pipe encountered, moved south.) (Fill) 2% - 3 ML Brown to tan mottled sandy SILT with gravel (medium stiff, moist) 3 - 4'A OL Dark brown mottled to red organic sandy SILT (soft to medium stiff, moist) 4% - 6 ML Tan mottled sandy SILT with gravel (stiff, moist) 6 - 10 ML Light gray sandy SILT with trace gravel, cemented increasing sand at depth (very stiff to hard, moist) (Glacial Till) Terminated at 10 feet below ground surface. No caving observed. No groundwater seepage observed. Test Pit TP-3 Location: SE comer of site Depth ft Soil Type Soil Description 0 - 1'/2 Brown silty SAND with gravel, numerous roots (loose to medium dense, moist) 1'/2 - 4% ML Tan mottled sandy SILT with gravel, gray at depth (medium stiff to stiff, moist) 4% _ 7 ML Gray massive SILT (very stiff to hard, moist) 7 - 11 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel, increasing gravel at depth (dense to very dense, moist) (Glacial Till) Terminated at 11 feet below ground surface. Minor caving observed in upper 2 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. ed by: Renee M. Hadley Excavated on: June 12, 20 GeoResources, LLC Test Pit Logs 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Proposed Steel Lake Plaza Fife, Washington 98424 29020 Military Road Phone: 253-896-1011 Federal Way, Washington Fax: 253-896-2633 Job# SteelLake.Mllitary.TP June 2009 1 Figure 68 Test Pit TP-4 Location, South portion of site. De th ft Soil Type Soil Description 0 - 5 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, debris (concrete pieces) (loose to medium dense, moist) (Fill) 5 - 6 SM Red brown to dark red brown mottled gravelly silty SAND (medium dense, moist) (Relict topsoil?) 6 - 7% ML Tan mottled sandy SILT with small gravel, gray at depth (medium stiff to stiff, moist) 7%Z - 11 %Z SM Gray silty SAND with gravel, upper contact very moist but no visible seep after 8 minutes (dense to very dense, moist) (Glacial Till) Terminated at 11'/z feet below ground surface. Slight caving observed within upper 4 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. Test Pit TP-5 Location: North center of site, toe of slope Depth ft Soil Tye _ Soil Description _ 0 - 1Y2 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, basal root layer (loose to medium dense, moist) (Fill) 1% - 3 ML Tan mottled sandy SILT with small gravel, gray at depth (medium stiff to stiff, moist) 3 - 4 SM Gray slightly mottled silty SAND with gravel (medium dense to dense, moist) (Weathered Till) 4 - 11 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel, occasional cobbles, cemented (dense to very dense, moist) (Glacial Till) Terminated at 11 feet below ground surface. No caving observed. No groundwater seepage observed. Test Pit TP-6 Location: West of TP-1, north of TP-2, on slope Depth ft Soil Type S_oil Description 0 - 2'/z SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, numerous (loose to medium dense, moist) 2% - 4 ML Red brown to tan mottled sandy SILT with gravel to SILT (medium stiff, moist) 4 - 6Y2 ML Tan to gray fine sandy SILT (stiff, moist) 6% - 12 SM Gray SILT/ SAND with gravel (very stiff/dense, moist) Increased sand at 8 feet (very dense) (Glacial Till) Terminated at 12 feet below ground surface. No caving observed. No groundwater seepage observed. Renee M. GeoResources, LLC 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Fax: 253-896-2633 Excavated on: June 1 TEST PIT LOGS Proposed Steel Lake Plaza 29020 Military Road Federal Way. Washlnaton JOB# SteelLake.Mllitary.TP June 2009 Figure 6b Test Pit TP-7 Location: E of old foundation. Depth ()_ Soil Type Soil Description 0 - 6 SM Brown silty SAND (loose to medium dense, moist) with septic tank (Fill) 6 - 7 ML Tan mottled o gray sandy SILT (stiff, moist) 7 - 12 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel, cemented (dense to very dense, moist) (Glacial Till) Terminated at 12 feet below ground surface. No caving observed. No groundwater seepage observed. Test Pit TP-2 Location: Between top of slope & Military Road Depth (ft) Soil Type Soil Description 0 - 4112 SM Brown silly SAND with gravel (loose to medium dense, moist) (Fill) 4%2 - 7 ML Tan mottled o gray sandy SILT (stiff, moist) 7 - 10 ML Gray silty SAND with gravel, cemented (dense to very dense, moist) (Glacial Till) Terminated at 10 feet below ground surface. No caving observed. No groundwater seepage observed. Logged by: Renee M. Hadley Excavated on: June 12, GeoResources, LLC Test Pit Logs 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Proposed Steel Lake Plata Fife, Washington 98424 29020 Military Road Phone: 253-896-1011 Federal Way, Washington Fax: 253-896-2633 JOB# Steell-ake.Milltary.TP June 2009 Figure 6c FEDERAL WAY _A6q, IRROR A SOUND PUBLISHING N[WSPAP[R Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way — Community Development Department FWM 1576 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 2nd day of September, 2009 ,and ending on the 2nd day of September 2009 both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 122.57 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 20th day ofOctober, 2009. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way -T'—'�? a, NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON TERYL A. HELLER My Appointment Expires Sept. 04, 2012 1414 S. 324th STR[[T, SUIT[ B210, F[D[RAL WAY, WA 98003 ■ 253-925-5565 ■ FAX: 253-925-5750 Consistency with Applicable Clty Plans CIT1OF F LO EF F Ld E ERAL WAY and Regulations: The project will be reviewed NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including the FWRC elzvironmenfal Project Name: Steel Lake Plaza codes; surface and stormwater Count Road Description: A 17,017 square foot commercial and zoning codes,, King office/retail center with associated site Standards nand King CaurAY S1'riace Water improvements - Road South, Federal Ci y Coontact Associate Planner David Lee, Location: 29020 Military Way. WA r�o, 1837 Camas Avenue 253-$35-2622 Applicant: Rico Gallia NE, Renton, WA 98055 City of Federal Way. Qepartment of Community Agent: David morstada. 306 South 289th Street, The official file is available for public review a s Federal Way. WA 98 Applicant Development Services (333 5A$�8p63. 718)h' Darn A Same as App Rate Application Received: August 4, 2009 PQ.Box 971$. Federal WaY, pate Determined Complete: August 27; 2009: FWM 15,76 Date of Notice of Application: Date of Publication: September 2, 2009 September 2, 2009 September 16,, Comment Deadline: 5R m p 2009 Permits Required; Lane! Use Process III 09• 102979-00•UP) SEPA Determination: SEPA File" #09-102980.00-SE Other Permits Known at this Time and not included in this Application: Building Permit I Engineering Approval Relevant Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist, St rmwater/Drainage Technical Intormation Repo ( ) Relevant Environmental Documents , are, Available at the Address Below: X_ Yes —No - Development Regulations to be used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way Revised Cade (FWAC) ubmit written comments Any person may s on the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community Development Services by 5:00 P.M. on September 16. 2009, Details of appeal procedures for the requested environmental decision will be included with the written decision. �: TICOR TITLE COMPANY 600 SW 39th Street, Ste 100, Renton, WA 98057 (425)255-7575 FAX (425)255-0285 Date: July 14, 2009 at 08:00 AM Prepared For: INQUIRIES SHOULD BE MADE TO: UNIT 1 (425)255-7472 Unit 1 Donna Roetter Order No.: Your Reference: Charge: Tax: PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A TITLE IS VESTED IN: Steel Lake Plaza LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: 6439715-1 Steel Lake Plaza LLC/Plaza $ 200.00 $ 19.00 RECEIVE® AUG 0 4 2009 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY That portion of Government Lot 2, in Section 4, Township 21 north, Range 4 east, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning on the easterly margin of the Old Military Road as conveyed to King County by deed recorded under Recording Number 3029941 at a point which is 804.05 feet southerly, measured along said easterly margin from the north line of said Government Lot 2; thence continuing southerly along the easterly margin of said road, 97.03 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of that tract of land conveyed to King County Water District Number 64 by deed recorded under Recording Number 4000252; thence north 89053'42" east along the northerly line of said tract to the east line of the west 756 feet of said Government Lot 2; thence north 0024'23" west along said east line to an intersection with a line drawn easterly and parallel to the north line of said Government Lot from the point of beginning; thence south 89035'05" west along said parallel line to the point of beginning; EXCEPT the westerly 12 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed recorded under Recording Number 7412120075. PARCEL B: The south 200 feet of that portion of Government Lot 2, in Section 4, Township 21 north, Range 4 east, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Old Military Road and the north line of said Government Lot 2; SCHEDULE A (Continued) thence east 404 feet, more or less, to a point 756 feet east of the northwest corner of Government Lot 2; thence south parallel to the west line of said Government Lot 2, 1097 feet, more or less to the south line of said Government Lot 2; thence west along said south line to the centerline of said Old Military Road; thence northerly along said centerline of said Old Military Road to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly margin of Military Road as established by deed recordd under Recording Number 7412120075. Plat Certificate Schedule A Policy No. 6439715-1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE A CONTINUED The land referred to herein is described as follows: PARCEL A That portion of Government Lot 2, in Section 4, Township 21 north, Range 4 east, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning on the easterly margin of the Old Military Road as conveyed to King County by deed recorded under Recording Number 3029941 at a point which is 804.05 feet southerly, measured along said easterly margin from the north line of said Government Lot 2; thence continuing southerly along the easterly margin of said road, 97.03 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of that tract of land conveyed to King County Water District Number 64 by deed recorded under Recording Number 4000252; thence north 89053'42" east along the northerly line of said tract to the east line of the west 756 feet of said Government Lot 2; thence north 0024'23" west along said east line to an intersection with a line drawn easterly and parallel to the north line of said Government Lot from the point of beginning; thence south 89035'05" west along said parallel line to the point of beginning; EXCEPT the westerly 12 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed recorded under Recording Number 7412120075. PARCEL B: The south 200 feet of that portion of Government Lot 2, in Section 4, Township 21 north, Range 4 east, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Old Military Road and the north line of said Government Lot 2; thence east 404 feet, more or less, to a point 756 feet east of the northwest corner of Government Lot 2; thence south parallel to the west line of said Government Lot 2, 1097 feet, more or less to the south line of said Government Lot 2; thence west along said south line to the centerline of said Old Military Road; thence northerly along said centerline of said Old Military Road to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly margin of Military Road as established by deed recordd under Recording Number 7412120075. PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS: General property taxes and special district charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1st; 2nd half delinquent on November 1st) Total Taxes for Year 2009 Amount Billed: $2,274.57 Amount Paid: $1,137.29 Amount Due: $1,137.28 Tax Account Number: 042104903903 Levy Code: 1205 Current Assessed Value: Land: $203,300.00 Improvements: $0.00 AFFECTS: Parcel A. 2. General property taxes and special district charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1st; 2nd half delinquent on November 1st) Total Taxes for Year 2009 Amount Billed: $4,099.02 Amount Paid: $2,049.51 Amount Due: $2,049.51 Tax Account Number: 042104908605 Levy Code: 1205 Current Assessed Value: Land: $380,800.00 Improvements: $0.00 AFFECTS: Parcel B. 3. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE by Steel Lake Plaza, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, must be executed in accordance with the Limited Liability Company Agreement and by all the members and their respective spouses or Registered Domestic Partners as of the date of acquisition, or evidence must be submitted that certain designated managers/members have been authorized to act for the Limited Liability Company. A copy of the Limited Liability Company Agreement and amendments thereto, if any, must be submitted. 4. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES FOR THE PURPOSES STATED THEREIN: IN FAVOR OF: Qwest Corporation, a Colorado corporation FOR: Telecommunications facilities DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED: July 31, 2003 RECORDING NUMBER: 20030731000083 AFFECTS: West 10 feet of the north 10 feet of the herein described property AFFECTS: Parcel A. SCHEDULE B (Continued) 5. COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW: RECORDED: August 12, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8708120829 6. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF. RECORDED: November 14, 1985 RECORDING NUMBER: 8511130675 PURPOSE: Stipulations concering the construction of a connection to a "district" water main for the purpoe of installing a fire hydrant and certain appurtenances, and costs related thereto 7. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: February 10, 1988 RECORDING NUMBER: 8802100725 PURPOSE: Domestic water supply and sanitary sewer system, and the costs related thereto 8. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: December 27, 2000 RECORDING NUMBER: 20001227002811 PURPOSE: Latecommer agreement 9. EASEMENT FOR GRADING OF STREET SLOPES, AS NECESSARY, OVER PORTION OF PREMISES ADJOINING STREET OR ALLEY AS GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: December 12, 1974 RECORDING NUMBER: 7412120075 GRANTEE: King County 10. Matters disclosed by Survey recorded under Recording Number 8408149016. 11. A survey of the herein described property was recorded under King County Recording Number 20090311900001. NOTES: A. Abbreviated Legal for purposes of King County Recorders Office is: Ptn Gov Lt 2, 4-21-4 . B. The records of King County and/or our inspection indicate that the address of the improvement located on said land is: 29020/29026 Military Road South Federal Way, WA A Vacant Land C. The only conveyance(s) affecting said Land, which recorded within 24 months of the date of this report, are as follows: GRANTOR: Huwiwa, Inc. GRANTEE: Steel Lake Plaza, LLC RECORDING NO.: 20080725001039 SCHEDULE B (Continued) AND GRANTOR: R. Hurlow, etal GRANTEE: Huwiwa Inc. RECORDING NO.: 8908311641 jh/07/22/2009 cc: Steel Lake Plaza, LLC Enrico V. Galiano Plat Certificate Schedule B Effective Date: 511 /2008 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Privacy Statement Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") respect the privacy and security of your non-public personal information ("Personal Information") and protecting your Personal Information is one of our top priorities. This Privacy Statement explains FNF's privacy practices, including how we use the Personal Information we receive from you and from other specified sources, and to whom it may be disclosed. FNF follows the privacy practices described in this Privacy Statement and, depending on the business performed, FNF companies may share information as described herein. Personal Information Collected We may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you on applications or other forms, such as your name, address, social security number, tax identification number, asset information, and income information; • Information we receive from you through our Internet websites, such as your name, address, email address, Internet Protocol address, the website links you used to get to our websites, and your activity while using or reviewing our websites; • Information about your transactions with or services performed by us, our affiliates, or others, such as information concerning your policy, premiums, payment history, information about your home or other real property, information from lenders and other third parties involved in such transaction, account balances, and credit card information; and • Information we receive from consumer or other reporting agencies and publicly recorded documents. Disclosure of Personal Information We may provide your Personal Information (excluding information we receive from consumer or other credit reporting agencies) to various individuals and companies, as permitted by law, without obtaining your prior authorization. Such laws do not allow consumers to restrict these disclosures. Disclosures may include, without limitation, the following: • To insurance agents, brokers, representatives, support organizations, or others to provide you with services you have requested, and to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure in connection with an insurance transaction; • To third -party contractors or service providers for the purpose of determining your eligibility for an insurance benefit or payment and/or providing you with services you have requested; • To an insurance regulatory authority, or a law enforcement or other governmental authority, in a civil action, in connection with a subpoena or a governmental investigation; • To companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or to other financial institutions with which we have joint marketing agreements and/or • To lenders, lien holders, judgment credits, or other parties claiming an encumbrance or an interest in title whose claim or interest must be determined, settled, paid or released prior to a title or escrow closing. We may also disclose your Personal Information to others when we believe, in good faith, that such disclosure is reasonably necessary to comply with the law or to protect the safety of our customers, employees, or property and/or to comply with the judicial proceeding, court order or legal process. Effective Date: 5/1/2008 Disclosure to Affiliated Companies We are permitted by law to share your name, address and facts about your transaction with other FNF companies, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate service providers to provide you with services you have requested, for marketing or product development research, or to market products or services to you. We do not, however, disclose information we collect from consumer or credit reporting agencies with our affiliates or others without your consent, in conformity with applicable law, unless such disclosure is otherwise permitted by law. Disclosure to Nonaffiliated Third Parties We do not disclosure Personal Information about our customers or former customers to nonaffiliated third parties, except as outlined herein or as otherwise permitted by law. Confidentiality and Security of Personal Information We restrict access to Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard Personal Information. Access to Personal Information/ Requests for Correction, Amendment, or Deletion of Personal Information As required by applicable law, we will afford you the right to access your Personal Information, under certain circumstances to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed, and request correction or deletion of your Personal Information. However FNF's current Policy is to maintain customers' Personal Information for no less than your state's re aired record retention requirements for the purpose of handlinci future coverage claims. For your protection, all -requests made under this section must be in writing -and must include Vour notarized signature to establish your identity. Where permitted by law, we may charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in respond to such requests. Please send requests to: Chief Privacy Officer Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32204 Changes to this Privacy Statement This Privacy Statement may be amended from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws. When we amend this Privacy Statement, we will post a notice of such changes on our website. The effective date of this Privacy Statement, as stated above, indicates the last time this Privacy Statement was revised or materially changed. Web date: 0412612007 ✓; WATER AVAILABUTY: • DING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF firtment of Development and Environmental Services WATER AVAILABILITY ✓ Building Services Division ---- EPU_JLAL9. 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 9W57-5212 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 This certificate provides the Public Health :.Seattle & King County Department and the Department ^of fY Development and Envirgriroent Services V1tti information necessary jg evaluate deve:looment proposals. _ Do not write in this box Number ✓ j�Building Permit ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Rezone or other: Applicant's name: ✓ Proposed use: L! / Location (attach map and legal description if necessary): a. Wate<can be provided by service connection only to are existing feet from the site. -----�-�y ► s`� ice? (size) water main that is OR � b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: r� Fi�AiTrctn .% H,1DP,, NT(5) (1) A`5 1 feet of water main to reach the site; and/or �(2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or (3) Other (describe): PEyci ��ti: —r r I z a. The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. OR 0 b The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will JI require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance of a permit or approval.) ' A a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR 0 b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service d A a. Water is or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at r.o less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant _ %5 ` f feet from th�siproperty (or as marked on the attached map): Rafe of flow at Peak Demand: ❑ lens than S00 gpm (approx. gpm) Cj 500 to 999 gpm 1000 gpm or more f] flow tsst of gpm ,caleulation of rlD� gpm Duradon: l] less than 1 hour i7 1 hour to 2 hours �q2 nours or more Other. (Note: Commerdal building permits which indude multifamily structures require flow test or Calculation } OR b. Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. ,.1 5 J .. a. Water system has certificates of water rights or water right claims sufficient to provide service. OR 0 b. Water system does not currentty have necessary grater, rights or water right claims .. 7#£ C)07r P(J f H4714. a —A Y ;fpv 8,£. APIFeJ V r*— x7Cuj:) I VYW- VG'* * rc FE7 gm p 4 vy4lificroA 14 r&LH W -Air 7 r vs r_'Rrn . _ or Ua rn'i4L _ - - i IJn(F _ . . 5r —1 I C£ 7 7 I certify, that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. LAEEHA'v`E 3 UTILITY DISTRICT Agency name Title a...r:_y..1 57;4rsw _ Signatory name t I'n r Pressure Zone, Elevation of Properly rr5` ; Est_ - pressure — psi J--114.-'- "',i:a '' Ali ',t;_aT)d'fii-�--�t!I A.iih� 'G��-:-5:= "_Th 1i _ _'IIII::I%: — - �::''J•t• rC'! .. The District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay or deny water service based upon j capacity limitations in District and Other Purveyor faciliti EIVED Water availability form Rev. 05-19-2D03 AUG o 4 Z009 Page 1 of 1 CITY of: FEDERAL WAY CDS ,. — I t {{ S. 288TH ST. W I 5 4 e1 ; Cl. 21t _�74 ral 1 41 88N — 72 73 20 sa107 -s _ I ra;•-cu.�. 1s---- 10 1 J •� - sus I oilit '-' 2 ss --�t r TRACT e I f 4 R 64 1� 59 y II Ad xS - a j G5 1'- I 63 T I 27' I~ 57' ll 'R�s I ---�7--� i1 t l :60 ; 59 { S. 290TH S- -- g - ------ f �•5-=Ye. �2"� 7'4.V rl- I - 53j sx 551 21 i �. cq 291 ST ST. zz Ii t 1t� 4j +_ i iiON 24 I ]7 � 38 I l s' 1A��"p°C0. Y<EEL a i35 .1 �i � I 3 sa.� tsoi� i � I 5 P9Ng5T. ----- ---- w A'-- 1 � 66 42 28 27 i 28 ' 'Lg ' 30 31 BRACT 96 p; - - _ - j RAINIER ME-AAWS LAKE ..'I JAVE N UTiL I`.1��' CIS ' Ief i� Hydraulic Model Fire Floe Estimate RequestlReporting Form Requested By: Kathy Brown Date: 01/25/99 Location to be Modeled: S 2W St. & Military Rd. S Lakehaven f # Section Chid: L-5 Intersection: S 288' St. & Militmy Rd. S Add. Description: See attached map Pressure Zone: 578 Results, By: Date: Model Run No,: JCB (07 fOnn update 01/25/99 Master Water System Mode12007.net by JPS) FF#101 ,,Condition Pressure (psi) Flow (gpm) Static 51 0 Fire Flow 20 F 8700 NOTES: Lakehaven's adopted level of service goals for fire flow rates m'e 1000 gpm withi& single fninily residential areas (including duplexes) and 2500 gpm for multi4muily, conuuercial, industrial_ m'eas. Model results depict the theoretical perfOlmmlce of the water system under high demand conditions and are not gtun'mlteed to represent actual system perf011llanee. A design professional should be consulted for site specific design purposes. The calculated fire flow capacity in the above table is based on a c1UTentivavailable residual system pressure of 20 psi at the location modeled, The model indicates that Lakehaven's standard maximum allowable velocity, of 10 ft/s is exceeded at a fire flow rate above 5300 gpm. Fire flow capacities greater than 5300 gpm may be accommodated through water system improvements. Form Rev. 5/30/08 Department Development and Environmental Services -Building Services, Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue: Southwest, Renton, Washfngtorr 98057-5212 206.29fi-5609 IM 206-296-7217 Web date: 0412WO07 SEWER AVAILABILITY.. FLING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF SEUVER AVAILABILITY ERUOrJK, For altemate- formats, call 206-29P-6600. This certificate provides : the Public 'Health - Seattle & King County. Department and the Department of Development and' Envirorimental Services with: information necessary, to; evaluate development proposals. 90 Do not write In this box V IjfBuilding Permit Q Preliminary o Pur '9TShort Subdivision Q Rezone or of as !�Applicanfs name: I I.h-KE= ;I' Proposed, use: C'om t: KC1At. £e.- --r4/L :Location (attach map and legal descriptiondnecessary): ZgD2 b Al/-/4/r-4WX 61/ S. information d' a. Saweq service, can be provided by side sewer connection only to an exlsHng _ ° +fl. sue sever feet. from: the site and the sewer system has the capacity, to serve the proposed.. use. OR .Q b. Sewer service wilt require: an Improvement to. the sewer system of' .O(1) _ feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site;. and/or Q (2) The construction of a collection system on the site; and/or, .0(3) Other (describe): J 2. Cxk a, The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County, approved sewer comprehensive plan. OR �0t b, The sewer system Improvement will require _ a sewer comprehensive plan t: amendmen. 1 3. J ct a, The proposed project. is within the corporate limits of the district or has been granted Boundary, Review Board approval for extension of seniice : outside the district or city':, OR :0 b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service: NM 1=. 4. Service is SUbject to the following: a. Connection charge: ZQ k-IT.O..1r,T e b. Easement(s): AS i6rA,ir, r ,: e. Other: < < F l 'Pl �` cll,�1-17. * M& j2i9$lc.Ht .�j j. diacroti— reserves f@ Sly L $i dale, gr a= sewer servim huml a=- ge� . limi[ulixa & T),'Rt l jbj- Or}ier Romer I certify; that the above sewer, agency: information is true . This certification shelf: be valid for one year from ° date of signature. LA'CEHAVUN 2Z LT= Dj0ZL9Z Agency name Signatory name Tkls S'sgnature rDate sewer availability form.doc b-cart-sewef.pdf 02-07-2002 Page 'I of 1 Statement of Design Intent The 17,017 square foot commercial center, known as Steel Lake Plaza, is proposed by Mr. and Mrs. Rico Galliano, owners of Galliano Investments. The center is designed to accommodate a variety of tenants, whether retail or office related, and the flexible plan can be modulated to suit the space requirements for any use. The north and west facades, which abut the 70 space parking lot, are visible from Military Rd. S. which provides vehicle access to the 78,980 square foot property. A pedestrian arcade provides covered access to the tenant spaces, as well as connection to an accessible pedestrian ramp, leading to the public sidewalk at Military Rd. S. The south and east facades are modulated and screened with landscaping. The project provides landscaped perimeter buffers along it's northern, eastern and southern borders with neighboring residential uses, as well as along the western frontage with Military Rd. S. Landscaped islands are also provided throughout the parking lot. Materials proposed include brick walls and columns along with stucco parapets at the north and west facades. Storefront doors and windows are aluminum framed. Walls and parapets at the south and west facades are finished with stucco. Landscape walls at the north and west borders of the parking lot are rockery. The stormwater system incorporates underground storage tanks at the parking lot and a bioswale at it's western border. The outlet conveyance across the north and east sides of the building discharges to a wetland southeast of the property. RECEIVED AUG 0 4 2009 CM OF FEDERAL WAY Cos n 5 AL Orr J.T. _ •- - l..c7JPY71 Ara ��,eVVJI L E •.Aov 7 Li . J vs . + ► -` r ` AK •r. ti ��K/J�, le j .al �• :r -'fir •mac �::,�� ,��' 1 � w Use Specialty Retail (SPA) Period Weekday Evening Street Peak Code 814 Parameter 1000 SF Gross Leasable Area Quantity 13.586 Studies 5 Outliers 0 Lower Data Range 15.000 Upper Data Range 210.000 %Entering 44 Rate 2.71 Std Dev 1.83 Equation Type Lin Coefficient A 2.400 Constant C 21.48 R^2 0.98 Data Close to Rate? y Data Close to Equation? y Closest Data Point RATE 'Trips by Rate 36.82 0.00 0.00 'Trips by Equation 54.09 0.00 0.00 Within Data Range? NO NO NO >2? YES NO NO N>19? NO NO NO Outliers<5%? YES NA NA y-intercept 21.48 NA NA Near 0? NO NA NA Std Dev/Rate>1.10? NO NA NA R^2>0.75? YES NO NO RECOMMENDATION STUDY STUDY STUDY Trips 54.09 0.00 0.00 Weight by Rate 1.48 0.00 0.00 Weight by Equation 0.98 0.00 0.00 RESULTS •RATE EQUATION AVERAGE Weighted Average 36.82 54.09 45.45 Entering Trips 16.20 23.80 20.00 :Exiting Trips 20.62 30.29 25.45 Pass -By% 0.00% 0.00= 0.00 'Total New Trips 36.82 54.09 45.45 Entering New Trips 16.20 23.80 20.00 Exiting New Trips 20.62 30.29 25.45 Use Specialty Retail (SPA) Period Weekday Evening Street Peak Code 814 Parameter 1000 SF Gross Leasable Area Quantity 17.017 .Studies 5 Outliers 0 :Lower Data Range 15.000 Upper Data Range 210.000 %Entering 44 Rate 2.71 Std Dev 1.83 Equation Type Lin Coefficient A 2.400 Constant C 21.48 R^2 0.98 Data Close to Rate? Y Data Close to Equation? y Closest Data Point RATE 'Trips by Rate 46.12 0.00 0.00 Trips by Equation 62.32 0.00 0.00 Within Data Range? YES NO NO W>2? YES NO NO ;N>19? NO NO NO Outliers<5o? YES NA NA y-intercept 21.48 NA NA :[dear 0 ? NO NA NA Std Dev/Rate>1.10? NO NA NA ,R^2>0.75? YES NO NO RECOMMENDATION RATE STUDY STUDY Trips 46.12 0.00 0.00 Weight by Rate 1.48 0.00 0.00 Weight by Equation 0.98 0.00 0.00 RESULTS <3TE EQUATION AVERAGE Weighted Average 46.12 62.32 54.22 Entering Trips 20.29 27.42 23.86 Exiting Trips 25.82 34.90 30.36 Pass -By% 0.00% 0.00 0.00s Total New Trips 46.12 62.32 54.22 Entering New Trips 20.29 27.42 23.86 Exiting New Trips 25.82 34.90 30.36 Avg 11'31 )e3'13 9�-4� 39 -3�'z;4 4!�MP-5 10/13/2008 Page 2 of 2 Auto Parts & Service Center 943 sq ft/GFA 0.00446 30% 30% 0.80 Service Station/Minimart/Carwash 853 sq ft/GFA 006061 47 % 47 % 0.80 Industrial Light Industry/High Technology 110 sq ft/GFA 0.00098 0% 0% 170 Heavy Industrial 120 sq ft/GFA 0.00068 0% 0% 170 Industrial Park 130 sq ft/GFA 0.00086 0% 0% 1.70 Manufacturing 140 sq ft/GFA 000074 0% 0% 1.70 Warehouse/Storage 150 sq ft/GFA 000047 0% 0% 170 Commercial -Administrative Office General Office 710 sq ft/GFA 000149 10% 10% 1.70 Medical Office / Clinic 720 sq ft/GFA 000372 10% 10% 160 Office Park 750 sq ft/GFA 00015 10% 10% 170 Indicates City of Olympia's Pass -by Rate http://74.125.155.1321search?q=cache:kVnd7SGNLmoJ:www. spokaneengineering.orgITran... 9/3/2009 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 2 This is the html version of the file http://www.spokaneengineering-org/Trans ortation%201mpact% 20Fees/Rate° 20Studv%20Pass-W 2O'1/ Trip°/o2OLength°/o2gAdj0001.�f. Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web. Page 1 10/13/2008 ITE Trip Rates. Pass -By. Trip Length Adjustment Factors Used in Rate Schedule ITE Rate Study Trip Land Use ITE Avg. Pass -by Pass -by Length Adj. Land Use Category Code Unit Trip Rate Rate Rate Factor Residential Single Family 210 dwelling 1.01 0% 0% 1 17 Multi Family (2 Levels or Less) 221 dwelling Q58 0% 0% 1.23 Mufti Family (3 Levels or More) 232 dwelling 0.38 0% 0% 1.23 Nursing Home 253 dwelling 0,17 0% 0% 0.93 Assisted Living 254 bed 0.22 0% 0% 0.93 Retirement Community 255 dwelling 0.29 0% 0% 0.93 Commercial Services Hotel (3 Levels or More) 310 room 0.59 0% 0% 1.33 Hotel/Motel 320 room 0.58 0% 0% 1.33 Movie Theater" 444 sq ft/GFA 0.0038 0% 0% 077 Health Club 492 sq ft/GFA 0.00405 0% 25% 1.03 Day Care 565 sq ft/GFA 0.01318 0% 25 % 067 Bank 912 sgfUGFA 0.04574 50% 60% Q50 Commercial Institutional Elementary School/Jr High School 522 student 0.15 0% 30% 067 High School 530 student 0.14 0% 20% Q67 University/College 550 student 0.21 0% 0% 1,00 Religious Institute 560 sq ft/GFA 0.00066 0% 0% 1.23 Library 590 sq ft/GFA 0,00709 50% 50% 0.67 Hospital 610 sq ft/GFA 000118 20% 20% 1.67 Commercial - Restaurant Quality Restaurant 931 sq ft/GFA 000749 44% 44% 1.13 High Turnover Restaurant 932 sq ft/GFA 001092 43 % 43 % 100 Fast Food Restaurant 934 sq ft/GFA 0.03464 50% 50% Q67 Espresso Stand- Each 0% 40°A 067 Drinking Establishment 936 sq ft/GFA 0.01134 30% 44% 0.67 Commercial - Retail Specialty Retail Center 814 sgfUGLA 0-00271 •4 m i 45 % 070 Hardware/Paint Store 816 sq ft/GFA 0.00484 40% 45% 070 Nursery/Garden Center 817 sq ft/GFA 0.0038 21 5% 30% 070 Shopping Center 820 sgft/GLA 0.00375 44% 44% Q70 Car Sales - New/Used 841 sq ft/GFA 000264 20% 30% 1.53 Tire Store 848 Service bay 3.79 0% 28% 0.80 Supermarket 850 sgfUGFA 0.01045 30% 30% 0.70 Convenience Market 851 sq fUGFA 0.05241 49% 49% 0.43 Pharmacy 881 sq ft/GFA 0.00862 49% 49% 0.57 Furniture Store 890 sq ft/GFA 0.00046 50% 50% 0.57 Video Rental 896 sgft/GFA 00136 40% 40% Q57 Ouick I uhdration VehirJe Shon 941 Service Aav .5 99 20% 20% n an http://74.125.155.1321search?q=cache:kVnd7SGNLmoJ:www. spokaneengineering.org/Tran... 9/3/2009 1011312008 iTE Tri Rates Pass -By, Trip Len th Ad'ustment Factors Used in Rate Schedule Land Use Ca"c yr 'Land Use Code Unit IT£ Avg. Trip Rate ITE Pass -Cy Rate Rate Study Pass -by Rate Trip Length Adj_ Factor Residential Single Family 210 dwelling G1 0 K 3 % 1 17 htuki Family (7 Levels of Less) 221 64ellina 58 G% 0,a 1.23 ,Muki FamiiY !3 Le vls or 7vSorej 2.32 fwelling 0.38 0% 0% 1 23 hlurging Home 253 dwelling f17 0% 0% 0 `i3 Assted Living 254 bed 0 22. 0% 0% C 93 (Retirement Commumiy dwelling (1,29 0` a 0% 01.93 Commercial Services Hotei r3 Levels or Morel 31C room I 0 55 0% 0% 1.33 I iotei/Motel 320 room 0581 0% 0 % 1 33 Movie Theater- 4-14 sq ft/GF-A 0.003a 0q %o 0.77 H_2Ith Club 492 so iUGFA 0.00405 0% 25 % 1 03 flay Caro 566 sr- AfGFA '] 0131 a 0% 25 % C 67 13anK 91• scftIGFA 00454 50% 60% 050 Commercial Institutional I_lementary Ss;heol,,Jr, High Scncxri 522 swoem 0 1 0% 30% (1,67 1-lighi Schccl 530 studer" ;4 C°% 20% �nw�t15r1yrGn;ie�e :i'3J s?t:dent ': -" 0°b U';< ' 0G :eels ous lflzbl_:t 560 sq BiGFA Uo0066 0% _ araav 5s 0 s-I fiGFA ?kC3 .7D: I 5J> C 67 -+cspitai 51;; sq?CiF:A e l}ff'^.6 20% 20%. Commercial - Restaurant uwti R=stauran: 931 sq 5/GFA 7 L-1749 44v, .14% +; 13 High Turn::*rmr Restaurant 932 sq VGFA 0.01092 43 0 13%v 1.9f! Fast =mod Restaurant 9.34 sq M33FA 0-03464 54°b 30Y 067 Espresso y`jand" - Each n.,% 40% 0,61 Dr. -king Estabgin..mcrit 936 sq 3vGFA rJ 01134 30% 44% 0917 Commercial - Retail Saeclali • Retail CeniPr 814 sy fUGLA 0.cul 1 40% =5 % C 70 HardwareiPelnt Siure Bib sgft!GFA 0. !}484 40% 45% 1}"r9 11urselylGardea iter 817 sq NGFA C.o3a3 21 55. 30% 0.70 Shlopp;ng Genter 820 sq F'GLA 0.0 `3; S ^^4% 44% Car Saies N_-wJUSed 841 sq fUGPA. 0.00264 20% 30% 1 53 7fre Store 848 Service bay 379 0% 28% 80 Supermarket 550 so R/GFA 0,01045 30% 30% 0170 fMcr:vemenc:e ?larket 851 sq y'GFA 0.0 �241 n9% t;5% 0 43 Pharmacy 381 sq ftjGF:A C.00562 49% '-9% 0.57 Furniture Store BC�i sq R'GFA 0 CW46 501/6 50% 1} ` (video Rental SSS so i'JGFA 0.0136 40% 40% 0.57 Quick. Lubnca'tion `Vehicle S-cp u4i �arvice Say 5 19 2v I 2::`.h f::?(1 Parts 8 Service Center 943 sq FJGFA a W445 i`1% 3z °'s 06.9 Service S`'.ationrMirimadJG'arvash 2.53 sq f'GFA 0 C16061 47% 47°, 0.30 Industrial Light Industrye-High Technology 110 sgft/G^A ;,.=;:lye r°n +.% 7.io Heavy Industrial 120 sq INGFA 0 C•u'068 0% 01% 1 7rl industralPark 130 sgFIfG-FA 0. 408E 0'! 0% 1.70 Manufactunri 140 sq f'.'GF: L XG74 CA 0% l.7il bJareflousel5ter'^e 15G sq ftiGFA 0 000047 0% 0`:% 77 Commercial - Administrative Office - zenara3 e 710 sq it;'GFA '?_00145 10i% 1 70 i4ledinal Office 7 Clinic ; 20 sq ft/GFA O'X372 iG% II% 11fi`6 t `j I.f,G�''arK '�°J sq ftlG� A I}iAJ1.Si ii}.0 iC'' 1 :7 ndicates City of Jiymwiia's Pass -by Rate rTransportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Memorandum DATE: October 12, 2007 TO: Dan Beardslee Erlandsen and Associates, Inc. FROM: Michael J. Read, P.E. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC RE: Tuscan Village, City of Chelan, WA — Traffic Impact Stud This report summarizes traffic impacts associated with Tuscan Village, a proposed mixed -use development located on the south side of SR 97A near SR 971 in the general vicinity between the existing Sunshine Market and Stamps Orchard developments in Chelan, WA. The document incorporates comments by WSDOT and the City of Chelan from September 2007. The study area is shown in Figure 1. This study addresses the following traffic impacts associated with the proposed action: ➢ Summary of project elements. ➢ Assessment of existing conditions through field reconnaissance and planning documents. ➢ Estimation of vehicular weekday daily, a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour trips generated by the proposed action. ➢ Assignment of daily and p.m. peak hour project trips onto the existing roadway network. ➢ Analysis of level of service (LOS) impacts at the following study intersection during the p.m. peak hour: 1. SR 97A / SR 971 2. SR 97A / Woodin Avenue 3. Johnson Avenue / Columbia Street 4. SR 97A (Woodin Avenue) / Sanders Street ➢ Assessment of site access, safety, and circulation issues. ➢ Evaluation of public transportation and nonmotorized transportation impacts. ➢ Identification of mitigation measures to maintain acceptable levels of mobility and safety based upon City of Chelan and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) standards and guidelines. Project Description The project site is located on the south side of SR 97A, generally east of SR 971 between the existing Sunshine Market and historical Stamps Orchard in unincorporated Chelan County. www.tenw.com PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 APPENDIX 16-A Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 2 Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 3 The proposed development is planned for full buildout by the year 2020 and would involve construction of the following land uses: ➢ 102 single-family homes; ➢ 564 residential condominium/ townhouse/ casita/ co -housing units; ➢ 288-room resort hotel; ➢ 200 students for a Kindergarten to 121h grade private school; ➢ 12,000 square feet of specialty retail space; ➢ 20,000 square feet of shopping center space; ➢ 8,000 square foot quality restaurant; and ➢ 5,000 square foot high -turnover (sit-down) restaurant. There are currently 10 existing site driveways accessing SR 97A from the properties. As part of the proposed development, 6 of these driveways would close. Three existing driveways would continue to remain open and be improved to full access roadways to include the western roadway for Tunnel Hill Winery & Sunshine Market, the western secondary roadway for Tsillan Cellar Winery vineyards, which would be rebuilt and serve as the site's Central entry, and the primary roadway for Tsillan Cellars Winery. A new eastern roadway approach would be constructed east of Tsillan Cellars Winery. A total of 4 site access roadways are proposed with the development. An existing agricultural/utility access connection would remain open and be used on an occasional basis. A conceptual site plan has been developed for the project and is shown in Figure 2. Existing Conditions This section describes existing transportation system conditions in the study area. It includes an inventory of existing driveway and roadway conditions, traffic volumes, intersection levels of service, public transportation services, non -motorized transportation facilities, and planned roadway improvements. Existing Driveway Conditions There are a total of 10 existing site driveways located on the property. The following paragraphs describe existing driveways accessing SR 97A. A map showing the location of all driveways is provided in Figure 3. 1. Sunshine Market & Tunnel Hill Winery Western Driveway — This driveway accesses the Sunshine Market, Tunnel Hill Winery, a single-family home, and vineyards. The roadway approach onto SR 97A is 33 feet. The roadway approach is paved. 2. Sunshine Market & Tunnel Hill Winery Eastern Driveway — This driveway accesses the Sunshine Market, Tunnel Hill Winery, a single-family home, and vineyards. The roadway approach onto SR 97A is 53 feet and paved and will be closed this year as part of the Tunnel Hill Winery project. 3. Tunnel Hill Winery Back Entrance Driveway — This approximate 10-foot gravel driveway serves as agricultural/utility access to farming lands part of Tunnel Hill Winery/Sunshine Mark. It is located just east of SR 971 and would remain open. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 4 Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 5 d i.• � �� w, may" fy A t } y\ •i • • AMP ice•%� • , 4 NMI s r a�- $ Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 • Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 6 4. 4205 Residence Western Driveway — This driveway accesses a single-family home and vineyard. A 35-foot gravel approach accesses SR 97A. This driveway would be closed. 5. 4205 Residence Eastern Driveway - This driveway currently accesses a single-family home and vineyard. A 36-foot gravel approach accesses SR 97A, and would be closed. 6. Harrison Property Driveway — This paved driveway serves an existing single-family home. This paved roadway approach onto SR 97A is 38 feet wide, but would be closed. 7. Tsillan Cellars Winery Western Driveway — This approximate 20-foot gravel driveway approach serves as a secondary entrance to Tsillan Cellars Winery. The roadway narrows to approximately 15 feet within the property. This driveway would be redeveloped as the Central site access roadway. 8. Tsillan Cellars Winery Primary Driveway — This 23-foot paved driveway serves as the main entrance to Tsillan Cellars Winery. This driveway would remain open. 9. Tsillan Cellars Winery Eastern Driveway — This 11-foot gravel driveway serves as a secondary entrance to Tsillan Cellars Winery and would be closed. 10. Stamps Orchard Driveway — This paved driveway serves Stamps Orchard and an existing single-family home. The roadway approach onto SR 97A is 53 feet and within the property narrows to between 8 and 12 feet. This access connection would be closed. Existing Roadway Conditions The following paragraphs describe existing roadway conditions affecting site access. Roadway characteristics are described in terms of number of lanes, posted speed limits and shoulder types and widths. SR 97A is classified by WSDOT as a rural minor arterial. Adjacent to the project site, the roadway consists of two, 12-foot travel lanes with 7- to 10-foot paved shoulders. The speed limit is posted at 60 mph west of the site and 50 mph along the property frontage. SR 971 is classified by WSDOT as a two-lane, rural collector arterial. The roadway consists of 11-foot travel lanes with 7- to 8-foot bituminous concrete shoulders. The speed limit ranges between 35 and 45 mph. E Woodin Avenue is a two-lane roadway with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. The total pavement width is 18 feet with 6-foot gravel shoulders currently used for parking. There is no posted speed limit sign but it is assumed to be 25 mph. Manson Highway (SR 150) is classified by the WSDOT as a rural collector arterial. The total pavement width is 34 feet with two, 11-foot travel lanes and 6-foot paved shoulders. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Intersection Level of Service Level of service (LOS) serves as an indicator of the quality of traffic flow at an intersection or road segment. The LOS grading ranges from A to F, such that LOS A is assigned when minimal delays are present and low volumes are experienced. LOS F indicates long delays Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 K Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 7 and/or forced flow. LOS F at signalized intersections is often considered unacceptable to most drivers, but does not automatically imply that the intersection is over capacity. Table 1 summarizes the delay range for each level of service at signalized and unsignalized intersections. The methods used to calculate the levels of service are described in the updated 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board). The measure of effectiveness for signalized intersections is average control delay, defined as the total time vehicles are stopped at an intersection approach during a specified time period divided by the number of vehicles departing from the approach in the same time period. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made of up a number of factors that relate to traffic control, geometries, traffic demand, and incidents. Total control delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during base conditions (i.e., the absence of traffic control, geometric delay, any incidents, or as a result other vehicles). For unsignalized intersections, a level of service and estimate of average control delay is determined for each minor or controlled movement based upon a sequential analysis of gaps in the major traffic streams and conflicting traffic movements. In addition, given that unsignalized intersections create different driver expectations and congestion levels than signalized intersections, their delay criteria are lower. Control delay at unsignalized intersections include deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay in waiting for an adequate gap in flows through the intersection, and final acceleration delay. The City of Chelan has an adopted LOS D standard. The Highway Capacity Software (version 4.1f) was used to evaluate levels of service at signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for Unsiqnalized Intersections Level of Service Signdlized Intersection Delay Range (sec) Unsignalized Intersection Delay Range (sec) A _<10 <10 B > 10to<_20 > 10to<_15 C > 20to<_35 > 15to<_25 D > 35to:555 > 25to<_35 E > 55 to < 80 > 35 to <_ 50 F >_ 80 > 50 Source: "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209,'rmnsportation Research Board, 2000, Update. Figure 4 illustrates existing channelization and traffic control at all study intersections. Figure 5 summarizes daily and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes. Turning movement counts during the p.m. peak hour were conducted by All Traffic Data Services, Inc., in 2004 and by Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC, in 2006 and 2007. Average weekday daily traffic volumes were provided by WSDOT. Recent annual traffic growth on SR 97A in the vicinity of the project site is estimated at a negative 1 percent growth rate. However, to analyze a worst -case traffic scenario, traffic volumes not counted in the year 2007 were factored by 1 percent per year to arrive at 2007 existing traffic volumes. Historical traffic counts are provided in Appendix A. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 8 c: tw < a ¢� N O r � a !S ei9wnlo� c _, U E o T n. a 3 a C � C 3 aAv 0P oM 3 Co 0 rCo 4Lj a O ru U �. L• � anl— e. a N 'x v W U Bi y P C Q1L621S go o r- ,U_7 2 bo'—� t 'v f+ N flii7 a � � a ac3 ba �=L F- Z Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 r-� Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 9 q > � N Q c 3 I O. � n � ^ N N m Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦Toll Free (888) 220-7333 m Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 10 Existing p.m. peak hour levels of service are summarized in Table 2. As shown, the signalized intersections and critical stop -controlled turning movements at unsignalized intersections currently operate at LOS C or better. Detailed level of service summary worksheets are provided in Appendix B. Table 2: Estimated 2007 P.M. Peak Intersection Levels of Service Unsi nalized Intersection Movement LOS Delay #1 — SR 97A at SR 971 EB Left A 8 SB B 14 #2 — SR 97A at E Woodin Ave EB Left A 8 SB B 12 #3 — Johnson Ave at Columbia St All -Way Stop C 16 Signalized Intersection Movement LOS Dela #4 — SR 97A at Sanders Street Signal C 23 Note: Analysis based on HCS 2000 results using HCM 2000 control delays and LOS. Public Transportation Services Link Transit provides public transportation services within Chelan and Douglas Counties. Route 21 serves the SR 97A corridor, with stops located in the vicinity of SR 971. Service from Wenatchee arrives at the Chelan High School between 5:00 a.m. until 6:40 p.m. Service departs from Chelan High School to Wenatchee from 5:45 a.m. until 7:25 p.m. Service is provided every half-hour during peak periods and one to two hours during non - peak periods. Service is provided Monday to Saturday only. Nonmotorized Transportation SR 97A consists of 7- to 10-foot paved shoulders adjacent to the project site. SR 971 provides 7-to 8-foot bituminous concrete shoulders. Planned Roadway Improvements The City of Chelan's Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (I7P), 2008-2013 and the City of Chelan's Trafc Grudation Enhancement Study, October 2005, identified the following transportation -capacity improvement projects that may be impacted by the proposed project: ➢ Johnson Avenue (SR 150) / Columbia Street Intersection. Signalize and restripe intersection, adding turn lanes. This improvement was assumed to be constructed under 2020 baseline without project conditions. ➢ Sanders Street / Woodin Avenue Intersection (SR 97A / SR 150). Upgrade traffic signal and restripe intersection, adding turn lanes. ➢ SR 97A at Sanders Street. Provide a southbound left -turn lane with a protected signal phase. ➢ SR 97A at Woodin Avenue. Provide a separate southbound left- and right -turn lane. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 11 Transportation Impact Analysis The following section describes transportation impacts the Tuscan Village residential development would have on roadways and critical intersections in the site vicinity. The discussion includes non -project related traffic forecasts, new trips generated by the proposed development, distribution and assignment of new project trips, impacts on roadways and levels of service at nearby significant intersections, site access, safety, and circulation issues, public transportation, and nonmotorized transportation. Non -Project Traffic Forecasts For the purpose of this traffic analysis, year 2020 was selected as the full buildout year for completion of the proposed development. A 1 percent per year background growth rate was used to estimate 2020 traffic volumes without the proposed project. In addition, traffic volumes from the following vicinity pipeline projects were used in addition to the background traffic growth rate to estimate 2020 traffic volumes without the Tuscan Village development (future year traffic volume forecast estimates are provided in Appendix C). ➢ A 19-unit residential plat known as Highlands. ➢ A 15-lot residential plat known as the Plat of Hillcrest Place. ➢ A 32-lot subdivision east of the site known as Orchard View Estates. ➢ A 119-unit senior housing development known as The Village at Lake Chelan. ➢ Granite Ridge with 350 residential homes, a 13,000 square -foot restaurant, and approximately 124,000 square -feet of specialty retail/commercial uses. ➢ An 85-lot residential subdivision known as Lake Hills. ➢ Chelan Lakeside, a 40-unit condominiums and 160-slip marina with no launch facility. ➢ A 12-unit condominium/townhouse residential development known as Chelan Landing. ➢ A 60-lot single-family residential project known as Cotter Orchard. ➢ A 32-unit condominium/townhouse residential development known as 910 Wloodin Ave. ➢ Northshore Condominiums, a 14-unit condominium addition. ➢ Tunnel Hill Wlinery, a proposed addition to include a 500 square foot tasting room and 1,000 square foot stone cottage (for food preparation and offices) to the existing Tunnel Hill Winery, and a 1,200 square foot commercial kitchen and 300 square foot/12-seat cafe. ➢ Holiday Hills, a 70-unit condominium, 268-townhouse, and 64 single-family home project. ➢ W>hisper View Subdivision a 101 single family lot project. ➢ Legacy Ridge subdivision — 94 single family lots ➢ Crystal Crest subdivision —17 single family lots ➢ MC Orchards — 67 single family lots ➢ Lake House- 40 condominium units ➢ The Vineyard — 22 townhouse units ➢ Raymond Street Villas — 9 condominium units ➢ Seawest — 39 condominium units Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 12 Project Trip Generation Trip generation rates compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 7`t' Edition, 2003, were used to estimate daily, a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour traffic that would be generated by the proposed action. Average rate or fitted curve equations for Single -Family Detached Housing (ITE Land Use Code 210), Condominiums/ Townhouses (ITE Land Use Code 230), Resort Hotel (ITE Land Use Code 330), Private School K-12 (ITE Land Use Code 536), Specialty Retail (ITE Land Use Code 814), Shopping Center (ITE Land Use Code 820), Quality Restaurant (ITE Land Use Code 931), and High -Turnover Sit -Down Restaurant (ITE Land Use Code 932) were used in estimating net new project trip generation in 2020. Pass -by trip percentages of 20 percent were used for shopping center and restaurant land uses on -site, which is a conservative estimate based upon documented pass -by percentages of 34 percent for shopping center and 43 to 44 percent for restaurants as identified in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2001. In addition, given the anticipated retail and restaurant services proposed on site, it was estimated that approximately 10 percent of all trips would be internal in nature. Therefore, the remaining 90 percent of vehicular trips were considered to be new vehicle trips generated by the proposed development under 2020 full buildout conditions, impacting the immediate vicinity street system. Table 3 summarizes estimated net trip generation of the proposed Tuscan Village development. An estimated net total of 7,650 daily, 590 p.m. peak hour vehicular trips (240 entering and 350 exiting), and 685 p.m. peak hour vehicular trips (400 entering and 285 exiting) would be generated at full buildout of the proposed development in 2020. Based upon the trip generation analysis, LOS impacts at off -site study intersections were only conducted during the p.m. peak hour since it generated the greatest number of peak hour trips, approximately 95 more net new trips than during the a.m. peak hour. Table 3: 2020 Net Project Trip Generation Land Use Land Use Code' Size' A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total :Single -Family Detached Housing 210 102 DU 19 56 75 66 39 105 1,000 Condominiums/Townhouses 230 564 DU 43 208 250 198 97 295 3,300 Resort Hotel 330 288 Rooms 76 29 105 60 80 140 1,400 Private School (K-12) 536 200 Students 85 55 140 15 19 34 500 `,Specialty Retail 814 12,000 GLA 8 1 9 18 15 20 35 550 Shopping Center 820 20,000 GLA 12 1 8 20 36 39 75 850 Quality Restaurant 1 931 8,000 GFA 3 3 5 40 20 60 700 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 932 5,000 GFA 31 29 60 34 21 55 650 Total Trip Generation 275 400 675 465 335 800 8,950 20% Reduction of Shopping Center & Restaurants Land Use -70 -10 -20 -20 -20 -40 -450 10% Reduction for Internal Trips -25 -40 -65 -45 -30 -75 -850 Net Trip Generation 240 350 590 400 1 285 685 7,650 I - tI'E Trip Generation Manual, T h Edition, 2003. 2 - DU is Dwelling Unit, GLA is Gross Leasable Area, and GFA is Gross Floor Area. 3 — ITE Trip generation formulas are provide as Attachment D. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 1 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 13 Trip Distribution and Assignment Based upon historical traffic volumes and patterns, the vicinity employment/service distribution within the area, and recent traffic studies conducted in the area, traffic volumes generated by the proposed action would be generally distributed as follows: ➢ 18 percent northerly via SR 150; ➢ 55 percent southerly via SR 97A; ➢ 18 percent easterly via SR 97A; and ➢ 5 percent westerly via SR 971; and ➢ 4 percent locally within the town of Chelan. Project trip distribution is shown in Figure 6, and project daily and p.m. peak hour trip assignment is summarized in Figure 7. Generally, the split east/west on SR 97A was derived based on the mixed use nature of the project and the fact that most services would be available to future residents within the project. As such, only 40 percent of off -site trips are expected to be distributed east of the site (toward the downtown Chelan vicinity). Traffic Volumes Figure 8 summarizes daily and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes with and without the proposed development in 2020. The greatest increase in daily traffic demand due to the proposed development would occur on SR 97A west of SR 971 with an increase of 4,200 vehicles and west of E Woodin Avenue with an increase of 3,100 daily project vehicles. All other sections of SR 97A and including SR 150 would experience an increase of 2,000 vehicles or less per day. SR 97A, SR 971, and SR 150 are designed to handle this additional capacity. Thus, no improvements are anticipated along study area roadways. Intersection Level of Service Impacts Intersection levels of service impacts were evaluated under future 2020 conditions and are summarized in Table 4. As shown, southbound movements at Intersection #1 — SR 97A and SR 971 would operate at LOS E without the project and LOS F with the project in 2020. Therefore, this intersection does not meet City of Chelan LOS standards under both 2020 without and with project conditions. The installation of a two-way, center left -turn lane or median channelization for southbound left -turns onto SR 97A would improve southbound movements to LOS D in 2020 with or without the proposed development. This improvement would be required regardless of the proposed project, but is recommended to be coordinated with a site access improvement at the proposed Western Access Roadway. All other signalized intersections and critical stop -controlled turning movements at unsignalized intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better under 2020 conditions with and without the project. Detailed level of service summary worksheets are provided in Appendix A. Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Tuscan Village Traffic Impact Study October 12, 2007 Page 14 bn v a c C ij E ps QjqW.ni y - 0 H U Nil t �o N vo 42 V c L 42 -c 0 U 0 CU o Lon Ln CL C on s L w L • F- z o z Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC PO Box 65254 ♦ Seattle, WA 98155 Office/Fax (206) 361-7333 ♦ Toll Free (888) 220-7333 Ann Dower From: Jamey Barr [Jamey@contourpllc.com] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 4:52 PM To: Ann Dower Cc: Brett Allen Subject: Steel Lake Plaza frontage Improvements Attachments: Steel Lake Plaza frontage.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hello Ann. Here is an exhibit showing the Steel Lake Plaza frontage issue. It is our opinion that we would provide the paving, curb, and sidewalk for the full section 'G' as required, and restripe the channelization in place. This would mean that technically there would be no taper of the travel lane thus a 3:1 taper from the end of the improvements back to the existing edge of asphalt would be sufficient per Federal Way, and KCRS. Lets touch base on the issue once you've taken a look. Thanks Jamey Jameq Barr Project Engineer Contour Engineering PLLC Office - (253) 857-5454 Cell - (206) 371-1088 Email -€; c ctll,cra. Web - www.cotitouLengineeringplic.com This message, including any attachments, is privileged and may contain confidential information intended only for the person(s) named above. Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply email and permanently delete the'original transmission from us, including any attachments, without making a copy. LU I— z Lu U ty- Q LU h �m Om U= x N 4 w J ~ a LIJ ui uj V) ME • Use the following formula to detennine the minimum length of the lane transition for high speed conditions (45 mph or more): L = VT Where: L = length of transition (ft) V = design speed (mph) T = tangential offset width (ft) • Use the following formula to determine the minimum length of the lane transition for low speed conditions (less than 45 mph): L = TV2 60 Where: L = length of transition (ft) V = design speed (mph) T = tangential offset width (ft) (c) To increase the number of lanes, a tangential rate of change in the range of 1:4 to 1:15 is sufficient. Aesthetics are the main consideration. (d) For turning roadway widening width transitions, see Chapter 641. (2) Median Width Transitions Whenever two abutting sections have different median widths, use long, smooth transitions (L = VT or flatter). When horizontal curves are present, this can be accomplished by providing the transition throughout the length of the curve. When required on a tangent section, the transition may be applied about the center line or on either side of the median based on whether or not the abutting existing section is programmed for the wider median in the future. To satisfy aesthetic requirements, make the transition length as long as feasible. Design Manual M 22-01 January 2005 620.08 Procedures When the project will realign the roadway, develop horizontal alignment plans for inclusion in the PS&E. Show the following as needed to maintain clarity and provide necessary information: • Horizontal alignment details (tangent bearing, curve radius, and superelevation rate) • Stationing • Number of lanes • Intersections, road approaches, railroad crossings, and interchanges (Chapters 910, 920, 930, and 940) • Existing roadways and features affecting or affected by the project See the Plans Preparation Manual for additional plan requirements. Justify any realignment of the roadway. Include the reasons for the realignment, profile considerations, alternatives considered, and the reasons the selected alignment was chosen. When the project will change the number of lanes, include a capacity analysis supporting the number selected (Chapter 610) with the justification for the number of lanes. Include with the justification for a frontage road any traffic analyses performed, the social, environmental, and economic considerations, the options considered, and the reasons for the final decision. 620.09 Documentation A list of the documents that are to be preserved [in the Design Documentation Package (DDP) or the Project File (PF)] is on the following web site: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/eesc/design/projectdev/ Geometric Plan Elements Page 620-5 Ann Dower From: Ann Dower Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 12:44 PM To: 'Jamey Barr' Cc: Sarady Long; Ken Miller Subject: RE: Steel Lake Plaza frontage Improvements Hi Jamey Our Traffic. Department ran allow a 4:1 taper on t he south end and 10.1. taper on the north end. start at the property corner. if there is inadequate right-of-way piease draw the improvements and indicate any problem areas of the existing pavement. Ann Hower Senior Engineering plaids Reviewer City of Federal Way 33325 Sth Ave .5 PO Box 9713 Federal Way, WA 98063-9713 253.835,2732 Email: ann.�vw�ar.��cit ofl�d+�s�l?,v�y,cprn From: Jamey Barr [mailto:Jamey@contourpllc.com] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 4:52 PM To: Ann Dower Cc: Brett Allen Subject: Steel Lake Plaza frontage Improvements Hello Ann. Both tapers world Also slow the edge Here is an exhibit showing the Steel Lake Plaza frontage issue. It is our opinion that we would provide the paving, curb, and sidewalk for the full section 'G' as required, and restripe the channelization in place. This would mean that technically there would be no taper of the travel lane thus a 3:1 taper from the end of the improvements back to the existing edge of asphalt would be sufficient per Federal Way, and KCRS. Lets touch base on the issue once you've taken a look. Thanks Jamey Jame{ Barr Project Engineer Contour Engineering PLLC Office - (253) 857-5454 contour engineering, PLC October 201h, 2009 David Lee City of Federal Way, Associate Planner phone (253) 857-5454 3309 561' Street NW fax (253) 857-5458 Suite 106 email 3nfoRcontourpklc.com Gig Harbor WA 98335 RE: File #09-102979-00-UP; STEEL LAKE PLAZA 29020 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Lee: Below are our return comments for our portion of the Steel Lake Plaza submittal. I think we have substantially conformed to the requested information. Please feel free to call me if you see any deficiencies. Development Services, Ann Dower (253-835-2732, ann.dowerA—cilyoffederalway.com Plans 1. Tapers are required at both ends of the pavement widening. Taper length shall be speed limit (mph): 1 (WSDOT standards; e.g. 40 mph = 40:1). Per discussion with Ann Dower, it has been noted on the plans that the tapers will be required as part of the project. At this time, we did not have enough survey to show the tapers. Since the taper starts in right of way, the taper should all fit. Ann and I agreed to discuss the taper lengths during the construction plan phase of the project. 2. Show conceptual street light locations on the plan view. Spacing would be a maximum of 175'. The conceptual lighting locations are shown on the plans. Adjustments to these locations can be accomplished during the construction plan phase of the project TIR 1. Please provide a description of the condition of each element of the downstream system and describe existing and predicted problems. Describe the "downstream natural drainage location " (is it a wetland, a ditch, etc.?) in greater detail and explain where it ultimately discharges. A more detailed downstream discussion is presented in the Level 1 Downstream portion of our TIR (section 3.0) as well as a detailed spreadsheet in Appendix A. 2. Explain the small pothole and pipes shown on the east side of the site. Where do these drain from and to, and what will happen to that runoff when the site is developed? This pothole was a partially installed detention pond from a previous development. This system will be replaced with the updated system per our plan. TIR The BLA resubmittal will be submitted separately by Sadler Barnard. Sincerely, rc:tt M. Alle�PE.�� Principal, Contour Engineering PLLC OCT 2 1 'Z00p, CITM OF FEDERAL W0 SU1L w.. . �e contour 1 2009 C1 BnLDj G AY DEPT. engineering, PLLC PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR: STEEL LAKE PLAZA AUGUST 2009 Revised October 2009 Prepared For: Rico Galliano Prepared By: Jamey Barr Approved By: Brett M. Allen, P.E., Project Manager Project # 08-041 I hereby state that this Preliminary Technical Information Report for .Steel Lake Plaza has been prepared by me or under my supervision and meets the standard of care and expertise that is usual and customary in this community of professional engineers I understand that City of Puyallup does not and will not assume liability for the sufficiency, suitability or performance of drainage facilities prepared by Contour Engineering PLLC. This analysis is based on data and records either supplied to, or obtained by, Contour Engineering, PLLC. These documents are referenced within the text of the analysis. The analysis has been prepared utilizing procedures and practices within the standard accepted practices of the industry. r- TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW............................................................................................................2 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE...................................................................................................................2 1.2 PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITIONS.......................................................................................................2 1.3 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS..............................................................................................................3 Figure1, Site Location Exhibit.......................................................................................................4 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY...................................................................6 3.0 OFFSITE ANALYSIS (LEVEL 1 DOWNSTREAM).....................................................................8 TASK 1: DEFINE AND MAP STUDY AREA: ............................................................................................... _8 TASK 2: REVIEW ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION OF THE STUDY AREA: .............................................................. 8 TASK 3: FIELD INSPECT THE STUDY AREA: ............................................................................................... 8 TASK 4: DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND ITS EXISTING AND PREDICTED PROBLEMS: .................................... 8 4.0 PRELIMINARY FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN DISCUSSION......................................................................................................................10 4.1 EXISTING SITE HYDROLOGY (PART A)...........................................................................................10 4.2 DEVELOPED SITE HYDROLOGY (PART B)......... ......................... :............. :........................................................... 4.3 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (PART C)............................................................................................11 4.4 FLOW CONTROL SYSTEM (PART D)...............................................................................................11 4.5 WATER QUALITY SYSTEM (PART E)...............................................................................................11 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN................................................................11 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES.................................................................................I....11 7.0 OTHER PERMITS.................................................................................................................11 8.0 TESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN............................................................................................11 9.0 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES & DECLARATION OF COVENANT..................12 10.0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL..................................................................12 Appendix "A" Level 1 Downstream Exhibit Appendix "B" Flow Control/water quality Design Calculations and exhibits Appendix "C" Geotechnical Report 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.1 Purpose and Scope This report accompanies the preliminary site plan for the development of a parcel of land located in Federal Way, Wa. Along the east side of Military Rd S., south of S. 2881" (see Figure 1). The site information and the preliminary analysis used for sizing storm drainage facilities are included within. The current City of Federal Way development standards establishes the methodology and design criteria used for this project. All storm drainage design has been done according 2009 King Co. Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), as amended by Federal Way. The following is a description of pertinent site information associated with the proposed project: Address — 29020 Military Rd. S. Tax Parcel Number — 0421049086, 0421049039 1.2 Pre -Developed Conditions Topography - The site has steep slopes along the west side, sloping from the west to the east at approximately 12% to 50%. The southeasterly portion of the site is moderately sloped to the east. Land use and Ground cover — No structures exist onsite, except for evidence of an old building foundation which was found on the north parcel. The remainder of the site is predominantly covered with brush and tall grasses, a few trees exist in the northwest corner of the parcel. Natural & man made drainage patterns — Drainage sheet flows to the east to the adjacent properties. An existing storm conveyance ditch is located on the southern property line that look to be installed at the same time as the existing detention facility on the site. The detention facility was installed during a previous development in the 1980's or 1990's (unclear). It appears that it was installed as a detention facility but the outlet was not maintained or hooked up to a downstream system. It appears the previous development lost funding and the construction was stopped. It appeared from the site visit that there was probably some storm drainage piping directing water to the detention facility, but it was very difficult to find due to the site being overgrown with blackberry bushes. This detention facility will be replaced by a current functioning detention facility that meets current City of Federal Way standards. Page 2 A summary of existing project site conditions follows: Existinci Basin Conditions Area (including offsite area tributary to site) Pervious Surface (Existing offsite impervious area considered forested as required for facility modeling purposes) TOTAL 95,040 sf 2.18 ac Soils Information A geotechnical study was completed by GeoResources, LLC, and a copy of their report is included in Appendix'C'. 1.3 Developed Conditions The Developed site consists of a 17,017 sf commercial retail/office center building. With a site entrance accessed from Military Road S. and associated parking areas. Half street improvements to Military Road S., and landscaping is to be provided as required. The construction of the interior travel way and parking will serve the building, and be graded to collect surface runoff. Then a closed system will be installed to convey all site runoff to the detention tanks which will be provided for flow control. All onsite and offsite pollution generating surfaces will be collected and routed through the appropriately sided bioswale prior to release to the detention tanks. The site will be graded to improve drainage conditions, while existing threshold discharge location will be maintained. Developed Basin Conditions Area acres (including offsite area tributary to site) Dev: Impervious surface: Pervious Surface: 65,547 sf (1.50 ac) 29,493 sf (0.68 ac) TOTAL 95,040 sf 2.18 ac Page 3 Figure 'I Site Location Exhibit _'",—fir--i � • - _ ��• ••� t ' '� ry� !' __ 4 � ' i� AA 288, Tf r: �,i • NL� �24 °' 31' i..�lYlli_ .nt r '_ ? 1:� • -: �: .� __. ` ti ��y '.:.: �� ,i:� e` i i "_"S ' � ' ` i � ' ! . -- • —G 20td.5t ' . : � • -=�'. pis ' . i • 1A .,} L� rL I' f, r j i i ,-S: � 29W . � � •�' _b ::ids-�� ti� •.'\L': --..—,_ r' •. j' •r' f �:-� "r - �;v. EF .? ?:�'_•'`+ •'! I - • i li I.L' • i • �ti _ - `y!� \..ram--:�_ 5~ y: '�4; �� mod. 71�.{yi .�-.�,�.�� r I; Z • 1` �_ I ...,� � j-�� - 1,..` Rd i] �`.�.?��.: ..;.�_.::}' ..... _'- _ ,i• ...-_ ~�,�`� n ��`� � it� �• 5;31Qth St 1 °ti g= >±'� 2000 Rf 3pCiues! Inif MaR Rita VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY Core Requirement: 1. Discharge at the Natural Location: The natural site drainage sheet flows from west to east. The developed drainage system will maintain the natural discharge location to the closed system offsite to the southeast corner in the Garden Townhomes site within an existing public drainage easement. A ditch along the southern side directs drainage from Military road and the property to the south to this structure 1. Off -site Analysis: Existing offsite flows from Military Road S. currently sheet flow into the site. After development the flows will be collected within the proposed curb and conveyed via a closed system into the site and through the proposed water quality and detention facilities. Drainage facilities have been sized to account for those offsite flows. A Level 1 downstream analysis has been performed on the downstream system. Calculations and Exhibits have been included in the following Section 3.0 and Appendix `A' of this report. 2. Flow Control: The project flow control system is to be designed per the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The tributary basin was determined to be 2.18 acres tributary area flowing to the pond. Flow control will be provided for all runoff within the proposed development offsite and onsite. The site consists of one basin of development. The site will discharge to the existing downstream conveyance system as specified within the KCSWDM. The detention facility was sized with KCRTS methodology with the following developed parameters. See Appendix 'B' for flow control calculations. A. Developed Impervious = 1.50 acres B. Developed Landscaping = 0.68 acres The detention volume required for the site was determined to be 18,895 cubic feet, based on the preliminary "Pondcalc" spreadsheet provided by King County. Due to the fact that there is no room for an open detention facility an underground detention tank system, will be utilized and located beneath the parking areas. The chambers will be provided with full access for maintenance within the parking areas. The chamber system will outlet through a control structure at the required rate which is to be designed with the construction phase, per the requirements of the KCSWDM. Page 6 - The proposed detention facility will replace a non-functioning detention pond on the project site. The proposed detention facility will provide a level of flow control that will adequately protect the downstream. 3. Conveyance System: The proposed 12" diameter onsite conveyance system will be analyzed and determined to have adequate conveyance capacity to convey the 25-year design storm event. Further analysis will be provided with the final TIR. 4. Temporary Erosion Control: An Erosion Control Plan meeting the requirements of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the City of Federal Way requirements, will be prepared as part of the Construction Plans. 5. Maintenance and Operation: A Maintenance and Operations Manual for the proposed storm system will be included in the final design document package. The system will be privately maintained. 6. Financial Guarantees and Liability: According to the 2009 KCSWDM, a Drainage Facilities Restoration and Site Stabilization Financial Guarantee will be required for the project. The Guarantee must be an amount sufficient to cover the cost of any corrective work performed specifically for the project. Prior to release of the guarantee, the applicant must do the following: A. Construct the drainage facilities. B. Receive final construction approval from the City of Federal way. C. Pay all required fees. Financial guarantee's will be provided at the time of submittal of the final TIR and construction plans and have not been included in this report. 7. Water Quality: A 10' x 125' bioswale will be provided and is sized to treat 60% of the developed peak rate for the 2 year storm event, prior to release to the detention system. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Special requirement #1 Other Adopted Area -Specific Requirements: Not Applicable. 2. Special requirement #2 Floodplain/ Floodway Delineation is not applicable to this project since it does not lie in or adjacent to the 100- year flood plain. Page 7 J. U 3. Special requirement #3 Flood Protection Facilities is not applicable to this project, since it does not contain or is adjacent to a mayor stream that has existing flood control or proposes to construct or modify and existing flood protection facility. 4. Special requirement #4 Source Control is applicable to this project, thus the King County Stormwater Pollution Control Manual will be followed. This will be addressed on the construction plans. 5. Special requirement #5 Oil Control is not applicable to this project. UFFSITE ANALYSIS (LEVEL 1. DOWNSTREAM] TASK 1: Define and Map Study Area: See Appendix 'A' for Downstream Basin Exhibit and Offsite Analysis Drainage System Table. TASK 2: Review all Available Information of the Study Area: Information was provided to Contour Engineering by City of Federal Way and field visits to the site including adequate maps to start the downstream as well as accomplish an inventory of the downstream features. TASK 3: Field Inspect the Study Area: The site was visited in May, 2009. Field inspection of the drainage area, and conveyance system was completed. TASK 4: Drainage System Description and its Existing and Predicted Problems: The current drainage system of the site is basically a ditch along the south property line and an unfinished detention facility located on the site. Neither function very well because they aren't maintained. Drainage trends to the southeast corner of the site where it flows into a catch basin on the Garden Townhomes site. The flows are directed in a pipe down to a bubble -up catch basin which disperses the drainage into wetland. We are unsure whether this downstream system is regularly maintained by the homeowners association of Garden Townhomes, but we expect that if it was not their pond would regularly back up. No sign of this was apparent at the site. The wetland appears to be a flat low point that is typical for this area of Federal Way. Observation of the wetland determined that it probably stores a fair Page 8 amount of water and has a large drainage basin feeding it. When it starts to fill up it begins to overflow in an existing low gradient ditch/culvert system that flows to the northeast through a development located there. This ditch/culvert systems seems to be fairly unmaintained, although no evidence of flooding has occurred. The ditch bottom has been inundated with reeds and wetland type plants based on its low gradient and proximity to the wetland. The ditch probably needs to be cleaned in order to function properly. Downstream Wetland Typical Culvert Page 9 4.0 PRELIMINARY FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN DISCUSSION 4.1 Existing Site Hydrology (Part A) The King Co. Runoff Time series method was used to model storm water runoff from the site. (only required for sizing of bioswale, detention is sized based on volume worksheet. See Appendix 'B'.) Existing Project Site The existing site characteristics and precipitation data are summarized below. Site Coverage Site Area Area - Pervious Forest 2.18 acres 2.18 acres See Appendix B for basin exhibit, and drainage calculations output. 4.2 Developed Site Hydrology (Part B) Proposed Project Site The proposed site characteristics and precipitation data are summarized below. Site Coverage Landscape Site Area 0.68 acres Site Coverage Impervious Site Area 1.5 acres Peak runoff rates for the design storms are shown below; the hydrographs are attached. Detention System The site resides within the Lower Green River Basin, which requires Level 1 flow control standard. The detention system will consist of an underground storage tank system consisting of a total of 540 linear feet of 95"x67" pipe. Discharge from the system will be regulated by a control structure. The control system will discharge at 50% of the existing condition 2 year, 24 hour storm while maintaining the existing 10 year, 24 hour storm event. This proposed system will replace a non functioning detention system at the site as the building will be constructed over the existing pond. The proposed detention system will function at a higher level than the previous pond design (assumption- no calculations available) Page 10 The detention requirement is 18,895 cubic feet of storage. Storm system sizing calculations and spreadsheet are included within Appendix B. 4.3 Performance Standards (Part C) Level 1 Flow Control per King County Stormwater Manual. 4.4 Flow Control System (Part D) See section 4.2 for discussion. 4.5 Water Quality System (Part E) WATER QUALITY DESIGN Treatment is required for the runoff of 60% of the 2 year peak storm event. Area -Pervious 0.43 acres Area -Impervious 1.01 acres Total WQ Drainage Area 1.44 acres 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The proposed storm pipe is required to be 12 inch diameter minimum. The roof drain system will use 6 inch diameter pipe. The 2009 KCSWDM will be used for calculating storm water runoff for conveyance design. 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES Geotechnical Report (Appendix 'C') 7.0 OTHER PERMITS Site development Grading Right of Way Permit NPDES permit 8.0 TESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN To be provided within final TIR. 9.0 BOND QUANTITIES. FACILITY SUMMARIES & DECLARATION OF COVENANT 9.1 Bond Quantity Sheets To be provided within final TIR. 9.2 Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Summary Sheet and Sketch To be provided within final TIR. 9.3 Declaration of Covenant To be provided within final TIR. 10.0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL To be provided within final TIR. Page 12 Level Downstream s1VIL t V) Lit pq '0 ++ E U O Q O V y o E r+r L UN d (D O o s 0 O y O a ,v N 0. r Lb Jl Qa 9y W'j a 2'3 all S 4 J 4 p A i= �_�� a � � �olG Y�o S s v m r 2-N o o �' ILc. arc a _v v �' m Z H N [] �N� ' .2aio �0 3 ( 4 Q- x o LLI a 0 Z 0 �M 4 A 4 �_ _ o,a-M VD 71' C. UM, jJr a S 0)d O moE E $D L i W rJ p U 0) � cq 'a O r p VlI O ai. ON) W El •�. p Q N co N E •- `� � E fl� �` E E c� 0Z `i aNQ s d c (� o E rL [co Q cr- OD O Vo 0 0 C D Legend: m Ui N N (n (7 (7 (D O O o Ci lv 7 7 O O 3 0 0 7 7 (n C C O O CID (D (D EnN CID N (n 0 7 0. 0O-n0cn c l< c cy- m D < (D cn En 0 !? O o• 0 W 7 O O pQj C 0 7 Q O � C 7 `G Q. Sy CD CL V CD CL �' W m� CL 0 CID (Q (^CID0 0 O 3 ;] 3 CL0 (CD N Sy N � � 7 Q 70 m n: m 7 Sy a m o 3� m O 92 O o am. 92.3� I,f � nK�� n3 d _ n�o^tea m m 5 CO ,_%oo � c� r N m o.d V p oNR �aolu; ,. I , T. `� Jr. :!_ _ I _� `y •'tom. , N , O a ^`-a j� ' ciJ. �•'l . -•f •r __ .� ---4 1. ' i / ` +I Ji}' ` • �� j' ' o' - as ---------- ------ ----"` f ✓ - _ i�, pA �$ _ s Lj• II , ' w w � � �i@� � � 1 p ' 1,., -- ---- - S 4 _ . y: o �/! Qg • `_ I _ _ ' I � m 0� r- Np ' � Q� -� •• �11 � _ r__ - `', •� � � �Q �� 'a- •__---spa" i;! I Q '�-�- _r_ �'$ ��'D ---------- - A O l' a ' 1 ` ----- -=---- r �•, `ti `�� vt �� _•. -o - _+' r L J - `.' oA _ - '•1 0 ; i i _�.. +o Ill j - �r i~/i f i f .' ..r^r 1 ' A '-I_==- ----- _ __ 45__--J--------- - '------------------- ---- � � r� � �__ �} w N A � � �e �a �e ' � �� i O(yJ�l }�•d1+-E � i I: =�F , ��—' r—�' N { co 2STH PL S 26TH PL 5�.a ( g w _ 1 - ' W m ` v L9 i CQ - r�l„\ r� \ I —L N I� N L-_ — w I of j m� N ; I v ^� [+1;~�� w, o •a L Ov N �i 5��.., .,� -,R, I m 1 fO r' v1-� m I I1 ' rt' ` i i �} / � y . 1• _ '.� /'. N 1 ✓ ; (fl r rf .-a �'' � �� --_ '` ' { J' e _ .'�'T -. '•J 1 1EI7a •`� 1 V .w,, `� j r f,,, _ L` I.�{ }7 _ r cn OLI, \� (a _� (A u� .� "' I cn I o n'oi Q T -� _ �, - '+• -a ^' (D i0p v� W N_� , •_•'1�, - ��1 -_ �.'' j 1�+j -I �o� i- �.� V1 �� I m + o rtit i A�+-� rim �;Y. i N,` 71H P L. S 3 ' , �� y ,� J t y {` 7� � r � � •. 1 � .. r `.1 "7 '-"' - -_.. - - � ' _ -- � I v o �j ^> � TI 1' ' r , Ir W w N� cA., a cAn rn mil z m f` ~ $ I I ~ �w�/� •`y -.i-a O ! -TT" I . +'y F }�-{ - • ±+ f I . 1 i� p \ \ ' '- ! .' ../' i GATE p N NN _� 5p `, if o I j _N -" �•- T + �rf/ ;r'� •S ' _ Pr oAV ,•rh , 1a Ij Wy 1 li S � (D C •.- m s� � r` I O 9 +' � r f � � gin' +a _ `� �'� �••, CP.r � �• ro f `��- � G Wt�v f = Ir + f �6!I �1 ;y�- }� r`' ems' i 1 `0 !'o l l' k f `�`^ Y�"� • -�' J g'-J' q ? S ,a+�� [�`r �; v_ 00 03 0) .CJi i i "i •� ' m i �:��-_J ;rr �`r00 w • _ - .i1'is� "' + r- I + 7� J 79 -i�$ 'p"� � �❑ P �-� � r' .•� '"3 �,m�"'�S IL � � �'�' u � p y_�_ ��'' ��+J '��-� "" J R Ob'- s u"`�� •� `ns .fr { `..°N J N a « q 1 Vx— w_� .�w , .mi �� .00 _ ' V t•', 1• mV�- ,�_".'' --`- J ti J ''�■• (11+ F 'M1 90Y /,c,j (Jl m I 1 j -? w i.J � !r j _ 5 1"I .- 'm N� i •~ `.. �'-�. V A. I 1�, , J /` �.f7:� 10 ` n 1 , �, 3•� [�%� �r� - , / !' LLJ a i '� N /, 'lJ ui v: w w! �w 7 .// ti U 7w •s! V s O o ' o•� I v g t �' i :�A �'� r v f .ci �' xn- /� f"'•= L' O o i v o f� �� -I J.,-� . 'y CD /'^' �' • 1�% v ' ' �� _ o . -E I `at r + , �: ( W f r ' E7�'. w� .PC �.. �m1� �,' �'��/,�/''� n ~ ir•' , '_ , I I � � ! v W � is •' ivl w�l-l. rr].� �. • L� �'�°tW 4,w; `I" �� n 0 �� _ �'- +r ► f� • `� .i+(7 `,.f" 1� 1 ` ' •, I �IVu.0 J� ' I 'j ++J w -m I 176j f j: • `��~ o, rl 1 •aa�;`,% `M 1 'ml f - '`, - - �J I . l S N r I ' f° T i 6 -- r 'a✓ -� ' ! 'b`' L �I� ' r2 i C � '•r �i r � a• • i 15--V`o'oo[[ ti s -.- py � l- ------ n T 1,' ` N , � ,aN, ru sq 1 l `la• I F7 rl ' �}lV •.1 , - .J p . - '.hi .� �, Y, 'S, Y y �'I 5 �r� fir} ._—J i i i 1 f •^CiJ rf wl �;'i ,�N.,I N� 5N }iN 1,A �N' �•^ `,- •hJ �'`C�>✓ .' .., �'�' • �. N N •1 i i ---- O ,-.N�,: Q v + M1 1 ` I APPENDIX B Flow control/Water quality design calculations and exhibits .L RIM 447.66 ' l IE V PLAS. N 445.31 N 1E B' PLUS S 44!l r' IE 6' PNAS. W. 445.46 ! 08 !, 1 RTM446S J ! 1 . IE 8' PLAS S. 443.8 19 Y i ! L1 OFF AM 1 - IV DRAIN MH 43& •_ RIM 439.45 �L I FLDVrCBE N.5430.70 Qp 1AOlYcR WE57 SIDE .. �I III - f gi p 43&79 �. IE 12' DONC 5. 430A1 1 1 STEEL LAKE PLAZA - COMMERCIAL CENTER A PORTION OF THE NW QUARTER, OF THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 N, RANGE 4 E, W.M, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE, GRADING, UTILITY, AND RIGHT OF WAY PLAN SAFQTARY SEWER 5TV8 PFj! sIRVEY CB TYPE 2 ASSHNED 6• AT APFROXMTLY B DZgM CONTROL STRUCTURE - aa3ILD RM .Og l.7 RD1-424.50 .I, ES ,E Irals.oe AQ7.� !• _ fiT lE(t•»u6sD _Al r Al Ul OF SITE ADDRESS: FIRE IFYDRANT E10STONG W SANITARY MAOi LFkSR FA 10 ---)Y Az3A aRFa TXCN4 �� t29.91_ CN rl �I rl CAI LF iY 0 i - 60L-!Y,SO Z-70 Mr. Ia J{' r PEAS -Mill 2930 MILITARY RDS FEDERAL WAY, OWNER/DEVELOPER: ® TYPE 2,B •ijZ♦,*3 A RIM-472.0 P.O. BOX 3437 IE 3r (W,S)-414,24 RENTON, WA. 98056 (206) 229-899B �\ ARCHITECT: / DAVIDTHORSTAD 406 289TH STREET FEDERAL WAY, WA 9B003 (253) 911-QSO / SURVEYOR: / SADLERIBARNARD & ASSOC INC -��-1----- 717 W. Stewart / / Puyallup, Washington 98371 2QD (253) 840-5170 424.3 �f t4�p L 4Z5.T.i�i�97L a {j _ _ _ _ .. w .- _ r R l 42{JJQ 420 =-49i Alb T 7 3 _ a-_____-__ +23 p T�IIg4 �.P i ` mwzzlo .r- J! 43o.s9 42�i.0 4219 till EKI 'J I to BIG CB TYPE 1 1 + RIM-423.43 I,s IE W-420.60 °Fa C/L 1 f i bum, TVyr Ei r D]uY1. PLANTER SIDPW vnt_ 1( si0' f ` 7.2% 1 ` EXIST. ►r2R6 2.0% MATCH EXIST. 2.0% d, 4r NEW PAVEMENT SECTION PER CITY STANDARDS. BEGIN PAVEMENT SECTION AT EDGE OF EXISTING CONCRETE, MATCH EXISTING SLOPE OF MILITARY ROAD SOUTH MILITARY ROAD SOUTH HALF STREET IMPROVMENTS NOT TO SCALE 0: 6'.i19AO 420 i FINISHED FLOOR; ELEV. = 424.3 419.76 STD N. 418.06 Eli GRAPHIC SCALE D 1D � 40 1 INCH = 20 FEET N S APPROXIMATE LOCATION PER A543W EXIST. SSMH TYPE 1-48' R04-4z0.00 IE (W N N-41ZI5 FE (6- DO SW-41230 X (6- IN) S-41230 M (W OUT) E-41105 NyjL9,j 53 APPROX LOCATION PER AS&ILLT EXIST®TYPE 1 11114 7.9 IE 1r (E)-412.80 ' AtiL' 42269 r 0.5 6 / � ®TYPE24B' 9 ~ RIM-421.00 CIS W (N,E)-412.90 c 1 6' B' 3' syM IA4 P.. wr ar_a Y 100' FEDERAL WAY STANDARD SECTION 'G' 2 NOT TO SCA E VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PARCE NyUkBFR5 29020 MILITARY ROAD SOUTH, 0421049085 29026 MILITARY ROAD SOUTH, 0421049039 VmTl NGVD29 ESTABLISHED FROM BENCH MARKS NOTED ON -GARDEN TOVMHOMES, A COROOMFNtil RECORDED D IN VOW ME 175 OF COHOWIRR64. AT PAGES 8 THROUG N 10,'RI DCll OF 10NG COUNTY, WA5HINGTON, FOR SLAOOFG ONE (iOEVAl+QLn) AND SVILDUG TWO [ELEVATION 42z56), 'i am RR SPIKE IN THE EAST SIDEOFPOVNHN PD(F.IOCATEDON THE WEST SIDE OF MLW ITAIg SOUTH ATTMESOVRIE0.4T4YtLY CORNEROF STTE AS SHOWN. ELEVATION 437.35 EXISTING LEGEND: (PER SALDER BARNARD & ASSOC. INC ® WELL 0 MONUMENTA5 DESCRIBED POLEW/UNIT • Si MOW. IS L9633 R POWERPME O FOUNDSURVEYMARWASDESCRIM � 6W WmE NDIN&,NIIf Ifil BILK IIFSIDWINTA!£ a CATCH BAffiJ Cmom tti WATER VALVE (C) 606UAIM VALUE R FIRE HYOPANT (IQ MEA%M VALUE © WATEll �) ILITOF'1PEMPA@ ® � VOL20T.MB67-A (KC) SMVEYNLU44-1 © SMST MN Ro m D sEWERsnM OC UBLEMAM EARTHWORK QUANTIFIES: ONSITE OFPSITE OUT =5,&70 CY CUT =176 CY FILL =ii CY FILL=456 CY NET=413BCY[]ff NET =29D CY FILL TOTAL SITE NET = 120B CY CUT THIS CALCULATION IS FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY THE NUMBERS SHOWN ARE FROM GENERATED FROM THE FINISHED GROUND SURFACETO THE EXISTING GROUND PROVIDED BY THE SURVEY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DO THEIR OWN CALCULATION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDE) WITHIN THESE PLANS. THE QUANTITIES MAY VARY BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FACTORS 1- SIIRINILr5WEL1 OF FXIll 93LS L VARIANCES OF VillrATDON THICKNESS AND U N9lRA8R$TOP5411- 3.S BASB REQL0RE4EFIf5 PORTHE BUILDING FOUNDATION BASED ON G601IC1(HTCAL REOOpY9PNg71ON3 AND ANAL 5TRU-T16UL DESLGK, 4 PAVEMENT SECTION WITHIN THE PARKING AREAS. 5. TRENCHING EXCAVATION FOR PROPOSED UTRITIES, DEVELOPED ONSITE AREAS IMfEAVIOOS i4ODF5 ILAM SF (0.10 AC) OPERVIWS PARKING 26,181 SF (0.60 AC) IMPERVIOUS SIDEWALK 1,776 SF (0.04 AC) TOTAL- 49,603 SF( L 14 AC) t��DSCAPE AREA: i6.244 SF N.61 !1C! TD1AL SITE +1AFR 76,383 SF [1.75 RC) CB RIM 447 66 I IE 8" PLAS. N 445,31 IE 8" PLAS. S. 445.11 IE 6" PLAS W 445 46 6, RIM 446 22 IE 6" PLAS N 443 62 IE 6' PLAS 5. 443 87 I !2u6 14 �` 1. r DRAIN MH RIM 439.45� FLOWLINE NFS 430.70 QD LADDER WEST SIDE •- s 1 CB RIM 433.79 r IE 12' COW. S. 430AI 1• c Aop x 47Q Cn GRAPHIC SCALE 0 40 50 60 1 INCH = 40 FEET DEVELOPED ONSITE: IMPERVIOUS ROOFS 21,646 SF (0,50 AC) IMPERVIOUS PARKING 26,181 SF (0.60 AC) IMPERVIOUS SIDEWALK 1,776 SF (0.04 AC) !n TOTAL: 49,603 SF (1.14 AC) LANDSCAPE AREA: 26,780 SF (0.61 AC TOTAL SITE AREA 76,383 SF (1.75 AC) j DEVELOPED OFFSITE: IMPERVIOUS (ROADWAY, WALK): 15,944 SF (0.37 AC) zn LANDSCAPE AREA: 2.528 SF (0.05 ACC TOTAL SITE AREA 18,472 SF (0.42 AC) TOTAL DEVELOPED: IMPERVIOUS: 65,547 SF (1.50 AC) LANDSCAPE AREA: 29,493 SF (0.68 AC) TOTAL SITE AREA 95,040 SF (2.18 AC) TOTAL WATER QUALITY: IMPERVIOUS (PGIS): 43,901 SF (1.01 AC) LANDSCAPE AREA: 18,927 SF 0.43 AC TOTAL WATER QUALITY TRIB. AREA: 62,828 SF (1.44 AC) contour STEEL LAKE PLAZA COMMERCIAL CENTER engineering, PLLC JOB NUMBER: os-o4i CIVIL ENGINEERS- LAND PLANNERS DEVELOPED SITE BASIN EXHIBIT DATE: AUGUST, 2009 3309 S6lh Strcet NW, SUNe 106, GIg Harbor, Washington 99335 Phone: 253-057-5454 Far. 253-857-5451 Flow (forl4rol Pondcalc Worksheet 1 nstructicn s: 1 Enter site information in the yellow highlighted cells 2 Verify no error message is displayed 3 Results are displayed in Green Box *Note: pondcalc will not work for negative landcover conversions. pondcalc does not handle existing El or TG very well. Disclaimer: This spreadsheet is provided without warranty of any kind. Use this spreadsheet at your own risk. All facility sizes should be verified using KCRTS software. Rainfall Region ST {either ST or LA see rainfall regions map} Scale Factor: 1.00 { 0.8 - 1.2 see rainfall regions map} FC Level: 1 { 1, 2, or 3 see flow control app map} Predeveloped Landcover Postdeveloped Adjusted Acres Error Messages acres type acres converted cover 2.18 TF 2.18 0 TP 0 TG 0.68 0.68 El 1.5 1.5 Acreage Check: post pre gross 2.18 2.18 adjusted 2.18 2.18 Storage Estimate: 2.4 inches per converted acre 2.4 inches per gross acre 0.4 ac-f't 18,895 cubic-ft -- N yadec enp3ey3 � o G6Z'„ZLJ Jeno3 Cr1 I a o m• � m: I SD N �m a J iL W c9 m E - v U) o � p 1n rz W C R Vto 4] - N nico UI I I S F� — ro y J 0 0 0 L7 O O 4 d [] 0 0 0 4 0 0 CJ 0 4 G] m LI ty hE r 16 O m 'Z— 'C] [6 itl S4 c6 0. m m @ fiS [S} S5 [6 <; mmmmmmmmmmmm a) C N O c a3 P Y E o c m � m � FI■ O (D «. o @ Q a� I� m r a �' f �•-cu -p � 'I1w CL p co •p T V L Q OO T aoo� .) a cn ° 0 ° N 0 U)U--0 X Cl 0 co M O M r C r V W uj �•+ v ° r r O Lo � CV N r coO N O d r r U] Qj O r x Z r r � co U al E ° i j � a.r .. U) v 0 rn ° Q in Oda ° o a� a) CD° m m o° x c m m U) C. Qm'o �m vim o �i qL o m y Ct '5 ¢ n O° c O ai c .� 0 rn cu y — �� D m oa Lm-0 o 0 0 m� ev 0i�'a�t=n Y x m O F11 rG E ai >, >, LLJ E � n `o m ° ° C; ai rn m m 2 LL a) a) a� '0 c 0 j E CO o ° a�i a� ° 0 0 ni °' o as co 0— co 0 ° ,� ns 7 -0 >,C 4+> ��a ��aad o m� 0 0a 2� E E E ; Xm o »�� } T Z ° °) ° ° m rn > O rn � Q U Q_ ° ° •' C] x 'x 'x �; w CO co w �U ° m� 47rn°� ° a>.5 °� a� � °�� co U O o o �Y c 9q[,� 4 +? >, °? •� E m a°i co m ° a n ° Cy a) o E �' r c�a n n a N. � ° ° U ❑'^ D cn ° :° a� o m ° .E o n� a� a� y Q o 0 3 0 0 Z o a ao Cr o o ca 0 *1 N ILU)0cnJwcn(nco(n000) Q_dHz�� OHQQ<;O Fdm (L U101 U 0 0 U) a� 3 E in x U W z z 0 .o 0 N 0 IA/C,li-C C Flow Frequency Analysis Time series File.dev wq.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates --- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.519 6 8/27/01 18:00 0.364 8 1/05/02 15:00 1.10 2 12/08/02 17:15 0.418 7 8/23/04 14:30 0.604 5 11/17/04 5:00 0.614 4 10/27/05 10:45 0.721 3 10/25/06 22:45 1.54 1 1/09/08 6:30 Computed Peaks 114, DEV wQ.pks (IS min. S+ePDS -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 1.54 1 100.00 0.990 1.10 2 25.00 0.960 0.721 3 10.00 0.900 0.614 4 5.00 0.800 0, 5 3.00 0.667 6 2.00 0.500 R 7 1.30 0.231 0.364 8 1.10 '0.091 1.39 50.00 0.980 W Q "law = 6n C� � �Cli. 2 f =CO. 6) x 0fS2- Page 1 Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel - 1 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Input Data Roughness Coefficient Channel Slope Left Side Slope Right Side Slope Bottom Width Discharge Results Normal Depth Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Flow Type GVF Input Data Downstream Depth Length Number Of Steps GVF Output Data Upstream Depth Profile Description Profile Headloss Downstream Velocity Upstream Velocity Normal Depth Critical Depth Channel Slope Critical Slope Manning Formula Normal Depth Subcritical 0.200 0.01500 ft/ft 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) 10.00 ft 0.31 ft'/s 0.13 ft 1.36 ftz 10.83 ft 10.78 ft 0.03 ft 1.86283 ft/ft 0.23 ft/s 0.00 ft 0.13 ft 0.11 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0 0.00 ft 0.00 ft Infinity ft/s Infinity ft/s 0.13 ft 0.03 ft 0.01500 ft/ft 1.86283 ft/ft °Irnih=S'�17sec =� 04�3 Sf/Os=129.2J Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00] 6/30/2009 4:35:13 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of _ 1