The URL can be used to link to this page

Council PKT 07-20-2004 Special/Regular ~ Federal Way City Council ~eeting AGENDA CO UN CILMEMBERS Dean McColgan, Mayor Jeanne Burbidge Jack Dovey Eric Faison Jim Ferrell Linda Kachmar Mike Park CITY MANAGER David H. Moseley Office of the City Clerk July 20, 2004 I. II. III. I. II. III. IV. AGENDA FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall July 20, 2004 (www.cityoffederalway.com) * * * * * SPECIAL MEETING - 4:00 p.m. CALL MEETING TO ORDER ETHICS BOARD AND DIVERSITY COMMISSION INTERVIEWS ADJOURNMENT REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 p.m. CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PRESENTATIONS a. b. Swearing-In Ceremony/Police Officers Introduction of New Employees/City Manager Emerging Issues/City Manager c. CITIZEN COMMENT PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. Citizens may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE (3) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long, relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate. Page 1 of3 V. VI. VII. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee olthree members and brought beli)/'" full Councilfor approval; all items are enacted by one motion. Individual items may be removed by a Councilmemberfor separate discussion and subsequent motion. a. b, Minutes/July 6, 2004 Special and Regular Meetings Vouchers May 2004 Monthly Financial Report Compensation Study Council Bill #340/Proposed Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan - Enactment Ordinance Council Bill #34l!Christian Faith Center Rezone & Agreement - Enactment Ordinance Council Bill #342/Comprehensive Plan Site Specific - Enactment Ordinance Disapproving Proposed Freeway Commercial Zoning Designation - Resolution Amendments to King County CDBG and HOME Consortium Agreement Revising JRC Membership Community Center 2% for Art Conceptual Artwork Proposal, Themes and Concepts Dumas Bay Landscaping Services Armstrong Park and Thompson ParkflOO% Design Approvals, Authorization to Bid and Award Projects/Resolution c. d. e. f. g, h, 1. J. k, 1. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS a. b. Ethics Board Appointments Diversity Commission Appointments INTRODUCTION ORDINANCE Council Bill #343/Code Amendment Updating Chapter 6/Criminal Code AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY (Amending Ordinance Nos, 91-89, 91-106, 95-254, 99-362, 00-374, 01-401,02-429. 04-458) Page 2 of3 VIII. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS IX. CITY MANAGER REPORT X. EXECUTIVE SESSION Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) XI. ADJOURNMENT ** THE COUNCIL MA Y ADD AND TAKE ACTION ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA "* THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS A V AILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AND ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER "PUBLIC DOCUMENT LIBRARV" Page 3 of3 MEETING DATE: July 20, 2004 ITEM# YCa) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [8] CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the City Council special meeting held July 6,2004; and draft minutes of the regular meeting held on July 6, 2004. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for permanent records pursuant to RCW requirements, CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the City Council Regular and Special meeting minutes from the July 6, 2004 meeting, as presented." CITY MANAGER APPRO V AL'-~ - ,.. " (BELQW J.:Oß!f ÇOMPLETED BY CI!Y CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 T ABLEDIDEFERREDfNO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 ~~~ Q~r FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall Regular Meeting July 6, 2004 -7:00 p.m. Minutes I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor McColgan called the Regular Meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the hour of 7 :08 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Dean McColgan, Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar, Councilmembers Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey, Eric Faison, Jim Ferrell, and Mike Park. Staff present: City Manager David Moseley, City Attorney Pat Richardson, and City Clerk Chris Green. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Public Works Director Cary Roe led the flag salute, III. PRESENTATIONS a. Introduction of New Employees/City Manager City Manager David Moseley was pleased to announce Mark Rodmyre has been hired as the city's newest Recruit Police Officer; and Timothy Thomas has been hired as a new lateral Police Officer. He welcomed them both and noted they will be sworn in at a later date. b. Emerging Issues/City Manager City Manager David Moseley announced there we no emerging issues to discuss tonight. IV. CITIZEN COMMENT Norman Ingersoll, spoke in opposition to the Potential Annexation Area on tonight's agenda. He questioned if an environmental study had been done and representation from the annexation area on the Council. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 6, 2004 - Page 2 of 10 Mayor McColgan asked City Manager David Moseley to have a staff member contact Mr. Ingersoll regarding his questions. Carla LaStella, spoke in opposition to the rezone of the Jackson property, she is concerned with potential impacts to the neighborhood as a result of a rezone and subsequent development. H, David Kaplan, complimented the Federal Way Police Department on their fireworks patrol, noting his neighborhood was firework free, He also urged the Council to pass item VII (a), to place a levy lid lift on the November ballot. V. a. b. c. d, e. f. g. h, 1. J. k. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Minutes/June 15, 2004 Regular Meeting -Approved Narcotics K-9 Ownership Agreement/W A State Patrol & FW Police Dept- Approved 2004 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant-Approved Washington Conservation Corps Interlocal Agreement-Approved "Pray Federal Way" Event at Saghalie Park-Approved Jim Webster Memorial Field-Pulled and Approved Separately Grant Funding Application/Transportation Improvement Proiects- Approved 2005 Street Sweeping Service/ Authorization to Bid-Approved 2005 Landscape Maintenance Service/ Authorization to Bid-Approved Bellacarino Woods Sewer ExtensionlBid A ward-Approved Proposed Modification to Cottages at Hoyt Road/Preliminary Plat - Resolution-Approved Resolution #04-416 Interlocal Agreement for Jail Administration-Approved Councilmember Burbidge pulled item (t)/Jim Webster Memorial Field. DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR MOVED APPROV AL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), AND (I), AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes yes yes yes yes Consent Item (O/Jim Webster Memorial Field: Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Ju(V 6, 2004 - Page 3 of 10 Councilmember Burbidge noted Jim Webster was a member of Federal Way's first City Council and was dedicated to parks and recreation in the community. She was pleased to make to motion to approve this item. COUNCILMEMBER BURBIDGE MOVED APPROV AL OF THE JIM WEBSTER MEMORIAL FIELD AS PRESENTED; DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR SECOND; The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes yes Kochrnar McColgan Park yes yes yes VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS a, Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan (2nd required public hearing) Councilmember Ferrell recused himself from this item and left Council Chambers. Mayor McColgan read into the record the procedures to be followed for the public hearing and opened the public hearing at 7:22 p.m. . Staff Report Community Development Services Associate Planner Isaac Conlen gave a brief report on this item. . Citizen Comment Suzie Horan, spoke to Council in support of the Jackson property rezone. Steve McNey, also spoke in support of the rezone of the Jackson property. Thomas Barnes, spoke in support of the Jackson property rezone. Pam Ditzhazy, spoke in opposition to the Jackson property rezone, and noted she is concerned about the effect it will have on their neighborhood. (Clerk's Note: See additional citizen comments on this subject given under General Citizen Comment portion of the agenda.) . Council Directive to Staff Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Ju~y 6, 2004 - Page 4 of 10 Councilmembers asked various questions of Mr. Conlen and Deputy Community Development Services Director Greg Fewins. Hearing no further comments, Mayor McColgan closed the Public Hearing at 7:35 p,m, Councilmember Ferrell returned to chambers at 7:36 p.m. b, Disposal of Surplus City Property/Resolution #04-417 Mayor McColgan read into the record the procedures to be followed for the public hearing and opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. . Staff Report Assistant City Manager Derek Matheson gave a brief outline and report on this issue. . Citizen Comment (3-minute limit) There was no citizen comment given on this item. . Council Directive to Staff COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED APPROV AL OF THE FINANCE/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REGIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION AND DIRECT THE CITY MANAGER NOT TO SELL ANY FURNITURE CURRENTLY LOCATED IN THE OLD CITY HALL UNTIL COUNCIL MAKES A DECISION WHETHER TO CREATE A BUSINESS INCUBATOR, OTHERWISE KEEP THE BUILDING, SELL IT, OR LEASE IT; COUNCILMEMBER FERRELL SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes VII. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Seeking Voter Approval to Maintain Current Property Tax Rate in 2005 (Property Tax "Lid Lift") Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 6, 2004 - Page 5 of 10 City Manager David Moseley gave a brief introduction for this item, noting it was prepared in response to a potential initiative which if passed would cut the property tax by 25%. He asked for Council direction to either proceed or drop for the upcoming November ballot Councilmembers discussed allowing the residents the opportunity to voice their opinion regarding the level of property tax for Federal Way, and not allowing a statewide initiative to dictate, They discussed the need for stabilization of property taxes, which fund many important services, and where the city only receives approximately lO% of all property taxes collected. They also voiced concerns regarding future initiatives that could have such severe potential cuts, which could have affected many needed programs such as public safety, human services, parks and recreation, and streets. Councilmember Ferrell disagreed with a levy lid lift and stated he is opposed to placing this on the ballot. DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR MOVED TO DIRECT STAFF TO DRAFT A RESOLUTION FOR COUNCIL TO CONSIDER AT THE JULY 20 COUNCIL MEETING. Motion dies for lack of a second. COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED TO HAVE CITY STAFF CONTINUE TO LOOK INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF PLACING A LEVY LID LIFT ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT TO COME BACK TO THE COUNCIL THIRTY DAYS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION TO PLACE ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT, AND FURTHER MOVED TO HAVE CITY STAFF LOOK AT ALL ALTERNATIVES OF STRUCTURING FORA POTENTIAL MULTI- YEAR OR SINGLE YEAR VOTE; COUNCILMEMBER FAISON SECOND. The motion passed 6-1 as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes no Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes b. Retail/Commercial Market Study for City Center (Postponed from 6/15/04 Regular Meeting) COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED TO REALLOCATE $50,000 FROM THE ELECTRONIC KIOSK AND $5,000 FROM THE DOWNTOWN "STORYBOARDS", PLUS ACCUMULATED INTEREST, TO FUND FOR THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED CITY CENTER REDEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES WORK PLAN. SPECIFIC EXPENDITURES OF THESE FUNDS WILL REQUIRE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL; COUNCILMEMBER FERRELL SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Ju(y 6, 2004 - Page 6 of 10 Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes c, Revised Parkway Annexation Boundary/Resolution #04-418 Community Development Services Associate Planner Isaac Conlen gave a presentation to Council regarding the revised Parkway Annexation Boundary. He reported the revision is due to the bisecting of three lots in the Stone Creek subdivision between the Milton and Federal Way PAA. In efforts to place this item on the November ballots, the Boundary Review Board recommended this area be taken out of the planned annexation. Additional lots north of the Stone Creek development were also taken out to make a more regular corporate boundary. COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED APPROVAL OF THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND THE APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN ELECTION TO PUT BEFORE THE VOTERS THE QUESTION OF ANNEXATION OF THE REVISED P ARKW A Y AREA AND TO DIRECT STAFF TO FILE A NOTICE OF INTENT WITH THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes VIII. INTRODUCTION ORDINANCES Councilmember Ferrell left Council Chambers for discussion on this item. a. Council Bill #340/Proposed Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER EIGHT "POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SUBAREA PLAN" OF THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AMENDING CHAPTER TWO "LAND USE", AMENDING CHAPTER FOUR "ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT" AND REPEALING THE EXISTING CHAPTER EIGHT "POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREAS," COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED COUNCIL BILL #340IPROPOSED POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SUBAREA PLAN TO SECOND Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Ju(y 6, 2004 - Page 7 of 10 READING/ADOPTION AT THE NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ON JULY 20, 2004; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed 6-0 as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes recused Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Councilmember Ferrell returned to Council Chambers, b. Council Bill #3411Christian Faith Center Rezone & Agreement AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON, RELATING TO LAND USE, ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING FOR 49.97 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF S, 336TH STREET BETWEEN PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH AND INTERSTATE 5 FROM BUSINESS PARK (BP) TO MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 3600 (RM 3600), AND ADOPTING AN ASSOCIA TED CONCOMITANT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN, COUNCILMEMBER FERRELL MOVED COUNCIL BILL #341/CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER REZONE AND AGREEMENT TO SECOND READING/ADOPTION AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING ON JULY 20, 2004; COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes c, Council Bill #342/Comprehensive Plan Site Specific AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED COUNCIL BILL #342/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SITE SPECIFIC TO SECOND READING/ADOPTION AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING ON JULY 20, 2004; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Burbidge Dovey yes yes Kochmar McColgan yes yes Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 6, 2004 - Page 8 (~f 10 Faison Ferrell yes yes Park yes IX. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Ferrell reported on his recent ride along with a Federal Way Officer, he was very impressed with every office he came in contact with and all the details their jobs entail. He also was pleased to report he attended the wonderful Red, White and Blues Festival at Celebration Park; he thanked all involved. Councilmember Park noted he also attended the Red, White, and Blues Festival at Celebration Park, and thanked the Parks and Public Safety Department for such a fine job each year. He further noted the next meeting of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee would be held July 9th at 8:00 a.m. in the Mt. Baker Conference Room. Deputy Mayor Kochmar echoed comments made regarding the Red, White, and Blues Festival; she thought it was the most well attended event yet. The thanked all staff and volunteers who worked to make is such a wonderful event. She spoke to congratulate and thank many local businesses and community members for their contributions to the community, and reminded everyone of the upcoming Salmon Bake at the end of the month at Steel Lake Park, and Festival Days in late August. Councilmember Burbidge also extended "kudos" to the Parks and Recreation staff and Public Safety staff for such a wonderful Red, White, and Blues Festival this year; she noted it was an enjoyable time for everyone. She announced the next meeting of the Parks/Recreation/Human Services/Public Safety Committee meeting would be held Monday, July lih at 5:00 p.m, in Mt. Baker Conference Room. She further reported she would be attending the Puget Sound Regional Council - Regional Transportation Policy Board where they will be discussing (1) transit hub funding - for the Federal Way Transit Center, (2) funding for HOV lanes for Pacific Highway South, and (3) planning and environmental work and construction for Phase III Pacific Highway Improvements. She further encouraged everyone to attend the many community performances including the Federal Way Symphony's Garden Tour on Saturday, July I ih. Councilmember Dovey encouraged citizens to visit the Federal Way Farmer's Market in the Sears parking lot of the Commons, each Saturday morning through October. He announced the next meeting of the Land Use/Transportation Committee would be held July 19th at 5:30 p,m. in Council Chambers. Councilmember Faison announced the next FinancelEconomic Development/Regional Affairs Committee would be July l3th at 5:30 p,m. he reported the committee would be discussing selection criteria for a potential downtown consultant. He also noted the Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Ju(y 6, 2004 - Page 9 (~f 10 possibility of scheduling a special meeting in the near future to receive a presentation from potential consultants. Mayor McColgan reported he attended along with many other colleagues the Association of Washington Cities (A WC) Conference in Ocean Shores where he was successfully elected to the Board of Directors for this district. He thanked his colleagues and City Manager for assisting him in campaigning for the position and looks forward to working with the A WC on many different issues. x. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager David Moseley reported the estimated attendance at the Red, White, and Blues Festival was 17,000 people, as reported by the Fire Department. This is the largest ever, he thanked all the departments, staff, and volunteers involved who made this a wonderful event. He was pleased to announce the certificate of occupancy for the first floor of the 'new City Hall was issued, and the Police Department and Municipal Courts are beginning to make the move, which will be done primarily over the weekend. Mr. Moseley followed up a previous report on the city scoring high at a recent Puget Sound Regional Council Board Meeting for the Highway 99 Phase III project. He noted we were recently informed we will receive a federal grant for $3.36 million under the regional funding category and another $778,000 grant under the countywide category. This is great news for this project, which will overhaul the highway between 284111 Street and Dash Point Road. City Manager David Moseley was also pleased to report our city has been moved from a Class 4 to a Class 2 rating on the building code effectiveness as determined by the Washington Survey and Rating Bureau. He noted this would reduce insurance costs for owners of new buildings in Federal Way by 23% for earthquake insurance and 10% for other coverage. He congratulated Mary Kate Martin and her staff on this accomplishment. He was pleased to report the Police Department is now fully staffed and preparing a wait list for future vacancies. He congratulated the Chief on this major accomplishment. Mr. Moseley also congratulated Human Services Manager Angelina Allen-Mpyisi on receiving her Masters Degree in Organizational Planning from Phoenix University. He further announced the Executive Session schedule for this evening has been canceled. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 6, 2004 - Page 10 of 10 XI. EXECUTIVE SESSION Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.11 O( 1 )(i) -CANCELED XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor McColgan adjourned the regular meeting at 8:42 p.m. Stephanie Courtney, CMC Deputy City Clerk FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall Special Meeting July 6, 2004- 6: 15 p.m. t>\t~f1 Minutes I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Deputy Mayor Kochmar called the Special Meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the hour of 6:20 p.m. Councilmembers present: Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar, Councilmembers Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey, Eric Faison, Jim Ferrell, and Mike Park. Deputy Mayor Kochmar excused Mayor McColgan's absence, who later joined the meeting at 6:40 p.m. Staff present: City Manager David Moseley, City Attorney Pat Richardson, and City Clerk Chris Green. II. COMMUNITY CENTER/BADMINTON COURT City Manager David Moseley gave a brief introduction and asked Interim Parks, Recreation, Cultural Services Director Donna Hanson to introduce the citizens who will be addressing Council on this issue. COUNCILMEMBER FERRELL MOVED TO SUSPEND COUNCIL RULES TO ALLOW CITIZENS TO SPEAK MORE THAN THE ALLOTTED THREE MINTUES PER PERSON; COUNCILMEMBER FAISON SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Ferrell yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes absent yes Dr. Su, spoke in support of placing a badminton facility in the new community center. H. David Kaplan, spoke in opposition to making modifications at this point to the community center facility for requests made from a small fraction of the community. Peter Townsend, spoke in support of modifications being made to the community center facility to allow a badminton tournament court. Federal Way City Council Special Meeting Minutes Ju~y 6, 2004 - Page 2 (~f 2 Councilmembers discussed the potential costs in making the requested modifications, and further discussed the various program cutbacks and modifications that have already been made to keep the project within the budget. COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED TO LEAVE THE COMMUNITY CENTER PLANS AS IS; MAYOR MCCOLGAN SECOND. The motion passed 6-1 as follows: Burbidge yes Kochmar yes Dovey yes McColgan yes Faison yes Park no Ferrell yes III. ADJOURNMENT There being nothing further to discuss regarding this matter, Deputy Mayor Kochmar adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:0l p.m. Stephanie Courtney, CMC Deputy City Clerk ;;LIb MEETING DATE: ~, 2004 ITEM# -sLC b ) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: VOUCHERS CATEGORY: BUDGET IMP ACT: [8J CONSENT D RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $3,471,091.43 $3,471,091.43 $ ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty ofpeIjury that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor perfo s described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of Federal Way, Washingto that I a t ized to authenticate and certify said claims. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve attached vouchers pursuant to RCW 42.24 PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of Vouchers. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~- .......-...........-...........-..-....... (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED D TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 ~ CITY OF . iF Federal Way MEMORANDUM Date: June 22, 2004 To: Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee Via: David Moseley, City Manager From: Tho Kraus, Finance Manager Subject: Vouchers Action ReQuested: Accept the vouchers and forward to the JUNE 29, 2004 Council meeting for approval. k:\fin\acctspay\checkrun\mfr cover,doc Jl apChkLst OS/21/2004 11 :22:08AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 Bank: key us bank Check # Invoice Date Vendor 179328 5/20/2004 000061 WA STATE REVENUE DEPAR 601-223-5385 Voucher: 179328 179329 5/20/2004 005208 COMMERCIAL CARD SERVI APRIL2004 Voucher: 179329 179330 5/21/2004 000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK# 2142 Voucher: 179330 CK#2156 CK# 2135 c ~ Inv Date Description Amount Paid 5/19/2004 MSF-APRIL04-REMIT B&O T 22,738.79 4/30/2004 MSF-APR04-CITY VISA CHAR 5,494,81 4/28/2004 PS-MAY04-ADV TAC TRGN-S 689,1 5 5/5/2004 PS-MAY04-FIRE INV-BENSEN 649,35 4/5/2004 MSHR-APR04-AWC CONF-N 40.00 Check Total 22,738,79 5,494,81 1,378.50 Page: 1 apChkLst OS/21/2004 11 :22:08AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description 179331 5/21/2004 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE 11033880 4/19/2004 PS-REPAIRJSVCITIRES Voucher: 179331 1033656 4/8/2004 PS-REPAIRJSVC/TIRES 1033689 4/9/2004 PS-REPAI RJSVCITI RES 1033888 4/19/2004 PS-REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033521 4/1/2004 PS-REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033681 4/9/2004 PS.REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033325 3/23/2004 PS-REPAIRlSVCITIRES 1033718 4/10/2004 MSFL T-REPAIRlSVCITIRES 1033772 4/13/2004 PS-REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033596 4/6/2004 PS-REPAI RJSVCITI RES 1033864 4/19/2004 PS-REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033763 4/13/2004 PS-REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033757 4/13/2004 PS.REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033884 4/19/2004 MSFL T-REPAIRlMNT 1033721 4/10/2004 MSFL T-REPAIRlMNT 1033678 4/9/2004 MSFL T-REPAIRlSVCITIRES 1033719 4/10/2004 MSFL T -REPAIRlSVCITIRES 1033894 4/19/2004 PS-REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033853 4/17/2004 MSFL T-REPAI R/SVCITI RES 1033654 4/8/2004 MSFL T-REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033604 4/6/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/SVCITIRES 1033680 4/9/2004 PS.REPAIRJSVC/TIRES 1033707 4/10/2004 MSFL T-REPAJ R/SVCITI RES 1033701 4/10/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/SVCITIRES 1033666 4/9/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/SVCITIRES 1033612 4/6/2004 PS.REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033697 4/10/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/SVCITIRES 1033727 4/12/2004 PS-REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1033513 4/1/2004 PS-REPAI RJSVCITI RES 1033867 4/19/2004 PS-REPAIRJSVCITIRES 1PARKLOT (AD 2/21/2004 AG03-211A:REINHARD DIST F 5/17/2004 (JUNE04) MRTGT PYMT PAR) L-. -C 179332 5/21/2004 007743 FULLER ELECTRIC INC Voucher: 179332 179333 5/21/2004 007385 GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTG 982004776 Voucher: 179333 Amount Paid 1,079.39 952.34 853.43 838.43 719.24 671,04 476.11 413.82 384.50 349.67 331.19 262.45 248.22 208.79 142.80 121,72 102,65 101 .28 88.12 77.63 72.08 68.89 56.55 51.10 43,28 38.84 27,19 22,19 18.49 13.32 391,60 48,429.50 Check Total 8.834.75 391.60 48,429.50 Page: 2 apChkLst OS/21/2004 11 :22:08AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Vendor Invoice Date L. \.Jì 179334 5/21/2004 008112 PORT OF SEATTLE Voucher: 179334 179335 5/21/2004 000445 SEATTLE-KING CO PUBLIC H FAOO06691 Voucher: 179335 179336 5/21/2004 007711 SPRUTE, GERALD (JERRY) SPRUTE Voucher: 179336 179337 5/21/2004 005616 STUDIO EAST Voucher: 179337 179338 5/21/2004 005253 US BANCORP Voucher: 179338 179339 5/21/2004 005254 US BANCORP Voucher: 179339 179340 5/21/2004 000094 WA STATE AUDITOR'S OFFI MANUAL Voucher: 179340 179341 5/21/2004 004258 WA STATE DEPT OF LlCENS APRIL 2004 Voucher: 179341 APRIL 6,2004 1259 APRIL2004 APRIL 2004 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 4/6/2004 PS-TASERS MODEL M26 W/B 2,284.80 2,284.80 3/30/2004 PRCS-PERMIT FEES-AARON 113.00 113,00 5/27/2004 LAW-JUNE04-WAPA TRGN-S 151.31 151 .31 10/3/2003 PKKFT-PERFORMANCE 5/2 1,500.00 1,500.00 5/5/2004 (APR04) CITY VISA CHARGE 2,994,83 2,994,83 5/5/2004 PS-(APR04)CITY VISA CHAR( 1,733.24 1 733,24 5/21/2004 MSF-BARS MANUAL ORDER 80,00 80,00 4/30/2004 PS-(APR04) REMIT CPL FEE 954,00 954.00 Sub total for us bank: 97,079.13 Page: 3 apChkLst OS/21/2004 11 :22:08AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 14 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 97,079.13 L ~ Page: 4 apChkLst OS/21/2004 11 :22:08AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 Bank code: key Check # Date 520662 12/16/2003 L -J Page: 5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179342 5/28/2004 000083 AARO INC DBA THE LOCK SH 38126 5/10/2004 MSFL T-LOCKSMITH SVCS 26.91 Voucher: 179342 38178 5/12/2004 MSFL T-LOCKSMITH SVCS 16.28 43.19 179343 5/28/2004 008128 ABC RADIATOR CO 5406 4/13/2004 PS-SRT RADIATOR REPAIR 810.82 810,82 Voucher: 179343 179344 5/28/2004 007177 ABLE COMMUNICATIONS 5/4/04-5/17/ 5/17/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 688,00 688.00 Voucher: 179344 179345 5/28/2004 000385 ACCOUNTEMPS 11076160 5/4/2004 MSF-(4/30) TEMP OFFICE HE 1,960.00 Voucher: 179345 11115085 5/11/2004 MSF-(5/7) TEMP OFFICE HEL 1,960.00 3,920.00 179346 5/28/2004 000568 AGRI SHOP INC 192491 5/6/2004 PKM-EQUIPMENT PARTS & R 123.00 123.00 Voucher: 179346 179347 5/28/2004 000475 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM S 4000564-000 4/20/2004 PKCHB-5/04 ALRM MNTR SV 103.00 Voucher: 179347 2921 043-000 4/20/2004 NCHB-8TH AVE-5/01-7/31/04 ¡. 75,00 178.00 L. 179348 5/28/2004 008161 AMARAL, MYRTLE AMARAL 5/14/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 51.88 51,88 ~ Voucher: 179348 179349 5/28/2004 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIO D6416 5/1/2004 SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 122.25 122.25 Voucher: 179349 179350 5/28/2004 003645 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SVC 3365 5/7/2004 AG04-09:(APR04) DBC JNTRL 5,783,75 Voucher: 179350 3366 5/7/2004 AG04-09:(APR04 )KFT JNTRL ~ 760.00 3367 5/7/2004 AG04-09:(APR04)PKM JNTRL 440.00 6,983.75 179351 5/28/2004 001746 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS A96093 4/6/2004 PWAD-APWA ANNUAL MEM 980.00 980,00 Voucher: 179351 179352 5/28/2004 008156 ANDERSON, SANDY 161290 5/6/2004 PKRCS-REFUND-RECREA TI 20.00 20.00 Voucher: 179352 179353 5/28/2004 008162 ANGLIN, CAROL L YN ANGLIN 5/17/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 40.43 40.43 Voucher: 179353 179354 5/28/2004 007158 ARCHIVES NORTHWEST LLC 0048 4/30/2004 PS-4/04 STORAGE FEE 73,85 Voucher: 179354 0040 4/30/2004 MC-4/04 STORAGE FEE 58.76 132.61 179355 5/28/2004 007865 ART UNICA DIGITAL MEDIA L 5927 5/4/2004 MS/GIS-BLACK INK VALUE P 1,313.33 1,313,33 Voucher: 179355 179356 5/28/2004 005134 ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES 1305-D04 5/6/2004 PKDBC-AD:CONGREGA TION 175.00 175.00 Voucher: 179356 179357 5/28/2004 000075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 26837633 5/12/2004 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME- 26.00 26.00 Voucher: 179357 Page: 1 apChkLst OS/2712004 2:52:46PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 179358 5/28/2004 007121 ATHLETIC FIELDS INC Voucher: 179358 179359 5/28/2004 003800 AVA (ASSN FOR VOLUNTEER04 AVA Voucher: . 179359 179360 5/28/2004 001604 BALL, GIGI Y Voucher: 179360 179361 5/28/2004 002386 BANHEGYI/ PAWLAK, SUSAN 5/17/04 Voucher: 179361 5/10/04 179362 5/28/2004 001790 BARGREEN ELLINGSON INC 4307394 Voucher: 179362 179363 5/28/2004 007479 BARKER RINKER SEACAT Voucher: 179363 ~ 179364 5/28/2004 004238 BEACON BALLFIELDS ~ Voucher: 179364 179365 5/28/2004 007247 BENSEN, MARK Voucher: 179365 179366 5/28/2004 007642 BLACKSTONE'S COLLISION I 5629-1 Voucher: 179366 Check # Vendor Date Invoice Inv Date Description 4/21/2004 AG03-162: ST LK SOCCER FL Amount Paid 2,073.40 50.00 35.00 70.00 35.00 371.61 156,849.02 992.13 174.20 52.50 104.95 162.98 Check Total 2,073.40 50.00 35.00 105.00 371.61 157,841 .15 226.70 104.95 162.98 AG03-162 #5 5/11/04 5/20/2004 PS-04 B OWEN AVA MEMBER 5/11/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 5/17/2004 MC-5/04INTERPRETER SVC 5/10/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 5/13/2004 PKM-MIRROR RECEPTACLE 5149 5/11/2004 AG04-33:APR04-COM CTR D 0005109 4/26/2004 AG03-73A:APR04-COM CTR F 0355349-IN 4/27/2004 PKM-ORANGE CONES/MEA 0355612-IN 5/5/2004 PKM-ORANGE CONES/MEA MILEAGE REIM 5/14/2004 PS-IAAI CONF MILEAGE REIN 4/23/2004 PS-VEH#523 REPAIR DAMAG Page: 2 apChkLst OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 4/27/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 1,113.24 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 407,78 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 352.35 4/20/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 301.92 4/20/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 292.67 4/20/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 291.58 4/28/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 277 .28 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 234.90 4/26/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 234.90 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 180.50 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 124.47 4/20/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 119.63 4/28/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 102.00 4/26/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 100.00 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 97.92 4/26/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 97.92 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 96.78 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 96.78 4/30/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 81.60 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 76.11 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 53.04 4/28/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 52.17 4/20/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 41,34 4/20/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 32.64 4/30/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 32.64 4/20/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 32,59 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 29,32 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 29.32 4/30/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 28.23 4/28/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 22.85 4/28/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 21.22 4/20/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 14.09 4/29/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 14.04 4/30/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 13.06 4/30/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 13.06 Page: 3 L ~ d Check # Date Vendor Invoice 179368 5/28/2004 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO 1360781 Voucher: 179368 363996 363228 358641-01 258984-01 358928-02 363638 362038 363481 358816-01 338808-01 361202-01 365109 364759 363476 363641 358641-02 358984-02 363950 361701 359173-01 362591 362474 362485 363939 363302 359183-01 359188-01 364525 363228-01 364074 354820 360781-80 362723 363992 apChklst Final Check list Page: 4 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 365204 4/30/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 13.06 363340-01 4/28/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 10.88 363948 4/30/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 10.88 362470 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 8.70 362486 4/30/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 8.70 363114 4/20/2004 PS-UNIFORMS& ACCESSOR 6.53 356210-80 4/23/2004 PS-UNIFORMS & ACCESSOR 4.62 5,173.31 179369 5/28/2004 005032 BOBCAT NORTHWEST 94395000 4/27/2004 PKM-STUMP GRINDER RENT 158.34 Voucher: 179369 94400100 4/30/2004 PKM-STUMP GRINDER RENT 109.80 268.14 179370 5/28/2004 000007 BOISE OFFICE SOLUTIONS APRIL2004 4/30/2004 APRIL2004-BOISE OFFICE S 695.73 695.73 Voucher: 179370 179371 5/28/2004 004315 BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REP 007513 5/19/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 309.59 309.59 L Voucher: 179371 - 179372 5/28/2004 008130 BROOKING INDUSTRIES INC 2772 3/31/2004 PS-K-9 WINDOW KIT 1,536.51 1,536.51 Voucher: 179372 179373 5/28/2004 007578 BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY 399526 4/30/2004 AG03-143A:PSA-OL YMPIC P 1,873.42 1,873.42 Voucher: 179373 179374 5/28/2004 000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN 7987 5/7/2004 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 421 .20 Voucher: 179374 8017 5/12/2004 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 83.79 8018 5/12/2004 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 41,50 8019 5/12/2004 PKDBC-CA TERING SVCS DA 27.20 8022CR 5/13/2004 PKDBC-CA TERING SVCS DA -22.96 550.73 179375 5/28/2004 000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC 20377508 5/17/2004 MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPP 122.16 122.16 Voucher: 179375 179376 5/28/2004 003093 CASCADE COMPUTER MAIN 9085061 5/11/2004 MSDP-PRINTER MAINT 685.44 685.44 Voucher: 179376 179377 5/28/2004 002351 CASCADE MOBILE MIX GONG 17113 4/20/2004 PWSWM-CONCRETE; CON 168.64 168.64 Voucher: 179377 179378 5/28/2004 004359 CENTURYSQUARESEL~S 5817 5/16/2004 PWSWR-1 YR STORAGE FE 1,232.00 1,232.00 Voucher: 179378 179379 5/28/2004 005712 CHANG, JENNY 5/18/04 5/18/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 113.75 Voucher: 179379 5/19/04 5/19/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 70.00 183.75 179380 5/28/2004 005657 CHOICEPOINT BUSINESS AN ABOOO0932727 4/30/2004 PS-4/04 AUTO TRACKXP SVC 220,00 220.00 Voucher: 179380 Page: 4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179381 5/28/2004 008163 CHRISTIAN, IRENE M CHRISTIAN 5/17/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 66.72 66,72 Voucher: 179381 179382 5/28/2004 000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK# 2159 5/11/2004 PS-MAY04-EXP HDL CRS-SU 706.88 Voucher: 179382 CK# 2157 5/5/2004 PS-MA Y04-SW AT CRS-ST AN~ 706.76 CK#2158 5/11/2004 PS-MAY04-EXPL ENTRY-NEA 441 .80 CK# 2161 5/13/2004 PRCS-NRPA 2004 BRD-SCHR 402.02 CK# 2162 5/24/2004 PRCS:REC SOFTW ARE-R JO 118.00 CK# 2163 5/24/2004 PRCS:REC SOFTWRE-LEBEL 118.00 2,493.46 179383 5/28/2004 000951 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AG04-38 #1 4/16/2004 AG04-38:RET HELD-WESTER 1,888.60 Voucher: 179383 AG03-162 #5 4/21/2004 RET:ATHLETIC FIELD INC-ST 99.88 1,988.48 179384 5/28/2004 006380 CITY OF VANCOUVER 127204 5/10/2004 PS-ADV TACT TRGN-SCHEYE 295.00 295.00 Voucher: 179384 L 179385 5/28/2004 003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA T1357748 5/13/2004 PKDBC-HOUSEHOLD SUPPL 584.44 - Voucher: 179385 T1348796 5/10/2004 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI 264.91 ~ T1353537 5/4/2004 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI 122.15 971,50 179386 5/28/2004 004395 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICA 0220-432458 5/12/2004 PKDBC-THEATRE LIGHTING: 129.91 Voucher: 179386 0220-432117 4/23/2004 PKCHB-LlGHTING SUPPLIES 106.41 236.32 179387 5/28/2004 002790 CONSTRUCTION TESTING L 10131 5/3/2004 PKNCHB-3 COMP STRG-MAS 225.00 225.00 Voucher: 179387 179388 5/28/2004 702133 CONTEXT ASSOCIATED C2627R5615 5/19/2004 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 141.00 141,00 Voucher: 179388 179389 5/28/2004 000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF APRIL 2004 4/30/2004 APRIL 2004 CORP EXP OFFI 4,767.17 4,767,17 Voucher: 179389 179390 5/28/2004 008150 CRICK, JAMES JURY REIMB 5/17/2004 MC-5/17/04-5/18/04 JUROR R 23.00 23,00 Voucher: 179390 179391 5/28/2004 008164 CROSS, CONSTANCE NORM CROSS 5/14/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 25,02 25.02 Voucher: 179391 179392 5/28/2004 007552 D J IMPRINTS 00213236 4/15/2004 PWDS-JACKET EMBROIDER 16,32 16,32 Voucher: 179392 179393 5/28/2004 000854 D J TROPHY 00213363 5/10/2004 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES 713.40 Voucher: 179393 00213331 5/3/2004 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES 35.90 749,30 179394 5/28/2004 008149 DMB, ANITA 5/17 - 7/16/ 5/17/2004 PRCS-ART INSTALLATION 100.00 100,00 Voucher: 179394 179395 5/28/2004 008166 DAHLGREN, ARLYNE L DAHLGREN 5/17/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 68,95 68,95 Voucher: 179395 Page: 5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179396 5/28/2004 000168 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMER3153535 4/12/2004 PWTR- LEGAL NOTICES RFB 724.20 Voucher: 179396 3152922 3/27/2004 SWM-NEWSP. LEGAL NOTI 581.40 3153781 4/17/2004 SWM-LEGAL NOTICE RFB 0 379.25 3153780 4/17/2004 SWM-LEGAL NOTICE RFB 0 340.40 2,025.25 179397 5/28/2004 008146 DAL TILE CORP 313-3264 5/19/2004 NEW CH- TILE 13,041.51 13,041.51 Voucher: 179397 179398 5/28/2004 008145 DAVIS, DEBORA ANN JURY REIMB 5/19/2004 MC-JUROR REIMB 5/19/04 21.50 21,50 Voucher: 179398 179399 ~2~2004 007584 DECATUR ELECTRONICS 119913 4/27/2004 PS-HANDHELD RADAR- 553.56 553.56 Voucher: 179399 179400 5/28/2004 008165 DEWALD, CHARLES ERNESTDEWALD 5/14/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 21.44 21.44 L- Voucher: 179400 .::;; 179401 5/28/2004 008039 DMX MUSIC AO14290 5/1/2004 MIS-MAY 04 DBS STANDARD 77.82 77.82 Voucher: 179401 179402 5/28/2004 005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA 5/12/04 5/12/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 140.00 Voucher: 179402 5/11/04 5/11/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 130.00 5/14/04 5/14/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 5/18/04 5/18/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 90.00 460.00 179403 5/28/2004 007548 DOXTATER & COMPANY LLC 040804 4/8/2004 AG04-77:REBOK EVENT CON 3,000.00 Voucher: 179403 052403 5/24/2004 AG04-77:MAY04-REBOK EVE 2,000.00 5,000.00 179404 5/28/2004 000939 DS WATERS OF AMERICA, L 8041800-15 4/1/2004 PKDBC-WTRlCL RNTL ACCT 144.51 Voucher: 179404 8041807-15 4/1/2004 PKCHB-WTRlCL RNTL ACCT 142.11 8044089-15 4/1/2004 PKM-WTRlCLR RNTL ACCT# 51.26 8041816-15 4/1/2004 MC-WTRlCLR RNTL ACCT# 28.86 8041796-15 4/1/2004 PKCP-WTRlCLR RNTL ACCn 6.53 8041792-15CR 4/1/2004 PKKFT-WTRlCL RNTL ACCT# -1.97 371.30 Page: 6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179405 5/28/2004 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE ~1034260 5/7/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MNT 1,164.11 Voucher: 179405 1034398 5/15/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MNT 692.10 1034160 5/3/2004 PS-REP AIR/SVC/TI RES 682.48 1034110 4/30/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 662,84 1034047 4/27/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 519,50 1034159 5/3/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 424.67 1034107 4/30/2004 PS-REP AI R/SVC/TI RES 349.72 1034166 5/3/2004 PS-REP AIR/SVC/TI RES 337.73 1034038 4/27/2004 PS-REP AI R/SVC/TI RES 331.19 1033779 4/14/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 188.54 1034081 4/29/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 187.07 1033743 4/12/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 181.02 1034192 5/5/2004 PS-REP AI R/SVC/TI RES 165.29 C 1034097 4/29/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 137.35 - 1034105 4/30/2004 PS-REP AI R/SVC/TI RES 82.79 --C 1034266 5/7/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MNT 38.61 1034265 5/7/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MNT 28.82 1034032 4/27/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TfRES 18.49 1034053 4/28/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 18.49 1034089 4/29/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 18.49 1034100 4/30/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 18.49 1034012 4/26/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 13,32 1034154 5/3/2004 PS-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 11.09 6,272,20 179406 5/28/2004 007585 EARTH TECH ENTERPRISES 1052804 5/1/2004 AG03-145:(MTH/03)LNDSCP t\, 436.28 436,28 Voucher: 179406 179407 5/28/2004 008141 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 2526566 5/6/2004 SWM-MAINTENANCE/REPAI 126.20 126,20 Voucher: 179407 179408 5/28/2004 007540 ELECTROTECHNICS CORPOFO035636-IN 4/27/2004 MSDP/PW/TR-SKYTEL PAGE . 1,436.16 1,436,16 Voucher: 179408 179409 5/28/2004 008144 ELICKER, TANYA L. JURY REIMB A 4/19/2004 MC-4/19/04 & 4/20/04 JURY R 23.00 23,00 Voucher: 179409 179410 5/28/2004 005598 ELLIOTT SALES CORPORATIC090983 5/10/2004 PKDBC-PROMOTIONAL PEN 335.91 335.91 Voucher: 179410 179411 5/28/2004 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 0161297 5/15/2004 PS-5/1-5/15 FUEL FOR VEHIC 7,163,76 Voucher: 179411 0161296 5/15/2004 MSFL T-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 3,662.69 10,826.45 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179412 5/28/2004 004840 EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE 103075 4/19/2004 PS-EQUIPMENT & REPAIR 130.56 Voucher: 179412 103079 4/20/2004 PS-EQUIPMENT & REPAIR 65.28 103078 4/20/2004 PS-EQUIPMENT & REPAIR 45.53 103087 4/20/2004 PS-EQUIPMENT & REPAIR 23.39 103077 4/20/2004 PS-EQUIPMENT & REPAIR 16.32 281.08 179413 5/28/2004 001131 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTR 7242 5/12/2004 PWST-JUMPER CABLES/CL 184.46 184.46 Voucher: 179413 179414 5/28/2004 000876 FAMILIAN NORTHWEST INC 197699 4/23/2004 PWSWM-MAJOR MAINTEN 1,771.26 1,771.26 Voucher: 179414 179415 5/28/2004 003130 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAP1WILSON 5/17/2004 PS-NAT ACAD ASSO LNCHN- 30.00 Voucher: 179415 KIRKPATRICK 5/17/2004 PS-NAT ACAD ASSO LNCHN- 30.00 KIRKPATRICK 5/20/2004 PS-6/18 FBINA CAND FORUM 15.00 C- WILSON 5/20/2004 PS-6/18 FBINA CAND FORUM 15.00 90.00 ~ 179416 5/28/2004 008151 FEDERAL WAY FARMERS MASTART UP CO 5/26/2004 LTAC-FARMER MARKET STA 21,250.00 21,250.00 'J . Voucher: 179416 179417 5/28/2004 005241 FEDERAL WAY HARMONY KI MA Y8-9,2004 4/6/2004 PRCS-CUL TURE ARTS PROD 800.00 800.00 Voucher: 179417 179418 5/28/2004 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 005490 4/7/2004 PWTR-4/7/04 NEWSPAPER A 236.38 Voucher: 179418 005503 4/14/2004 PWTR-4/14/04 NEWSPAPER J 236.38 005513 4/17/2004 SWM-4/17/04 NEWSP AD5/L 225.76 005499 4/10/2004 SWM-4/10/04 NEWSP ADS/L 225.76 005512 4/17/2004 SWM-4/17/07 NEWSP ADS/L 199,20 005498 4/10/2004 SWM-4/10/04 NEWSP ADS/L 199.20 005514 4/17/2004 CDPL-4/17/04 LEGALS- 112.88 005455 3/24/2004 NCHB-3/24/04 NEWSPAPER ~ 43.82 005521 4/24/2004 MSMD-4/24/04 NEWSPAPER J 39.84 005515 4/17/2004 MSMD-4/17/04 NEWSPAPER J 39.84 1,559.06 179419 5/28/2004 008167 FIELD, ILA W FIELD 5/19/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 210.75 210.75 Voucher: 179419 179420 5/28/2004 005213 FIFE PRINTING 16078 5/10/2004 MC-PRINTING SERVICES 359.63 359.63 Voucher: 179420 179421 5/28/2004 001686 FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MA04064925409 5/7/2004 MS/M&D-JUN04-COPIER LEA 117.50 117.50 Voucher: 179421 179422 5/28/2004 004366 FLOYD EQUIPMENT COMPAN32547 4/26/2004 PWSWM-REPA/R/MAINTENA 48.49 48.49 Voucher: 179422 Page: 8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Descriøtion Amount Paid Check Total 179423 5/28/2004 006099 FOOTHILLS STUMP GRINDIN 4/10/04 4/10/2004 PWST-STUMP GRINDING S 489.60 489.60 Voucher: 179423 179424 5/28/2004 001299 FORD GRAPHICS 2535263 4/12/2004 PWSWM-PRINTING SERVI 89.43 89.43 Voucher: 179424 179425 5/28/2004 003068 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC 766933-00 5/7/2004 SWM-REPLACE RAIN GAUG 83,16 83,16 Voucher: 179425 179426 5/28/2004 002870 FREEWAY TRAILER SALES I 030542 5/14/2004 MSFL T-VEHICLE REPAIRS/S 402.73 Voucher: 179426 030323 5/12/2004 MSFL T-VEHICLE REPAIRS/S 70,72 473.45 179427 5/28/2004 004566 G&M HONEST PERFORMANC 64442 5/20/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 76,32 76,32 Voucher: 179427 179428 5/28/2004 003118 GALLS INC 569107540101 4/30/2004 PS-CLOTHING/EQUIPMENT 469,00 Voucher: 179428 569759010101 4/30/2004 PS-CLOTHING/EQUIPMENT 320.97 789.97 C. 179429 5/28/2004 005938 GAMBLE, JANE EMPLOY REIM 5/4/2004 CD-CALENDAR/ORGANIZER ( 97.91 97.91 ~ Voucher: 179429 ~' 179430 5/28/2004 008139 GITT'S SPRING SUSPENSION 241030016 4/12/2004 PS-SRT REPAIRlSVC 2,179.45 2,179.45 Voucher: 179430 179431 5/28/2004 002547 GRAINGER INC 755-354062-1 5/6/2004 PKNCH-FACILITY MAINT SU 69,32 69,32 Voucher: 179431 179432 5/28/2004 008134 GUARDIAN SECURITY AG04-71 #1 4/30/2004 AG04-71 :NEW CH-SECURITY 12,208.56 Voucher: 179432 AG04-74 #1 4/30/2004 AG04-74:NEW CH-CCTV CON 9,461.53 21,670,09 179433 5/28/2004 000671 H 0 FOWLER COMPANY 11457562 4/29/2004 PKM-GD REPAIRIMAINT SUP 76,81 Voucher: 179433 11460005 5/4/2004 PKM-GD REPAIRIMAINT SUP 20.10 11462217 5/6/2004 PKM-GD REPAIRIMAINT SUP 10.81 107,72 179434 5/28/2004 008131 HAM MARS UNIFORM 34513 4/30/2004 PS-BLU II LADIES CONCEALA 1,148,93 1,148.93 Voucher: 179434 179435 5/28/2004 004204 HARTL P.S., COLLEEN A 5/17/04 5/17/2004 MC-LEGAL SERVICES 125.00 125,00 Voucher: 179435 179436 5/28/2004 003670 IABTI K SCHENKEL 5/10/2004 PS-2004 IABTI DUES-K SCHEI 75,00 75.00 Voucher: 179436 179437 5/28/2004 008104 ICOM AMERICA INC 4832291 SO 5/11/2004 PS-SCANNER/RECEIVERS- 679.29 679,29 Voucher: 179437 179438 5/28/2004 001431 ICON MATERIALS INC 393479 5/13/2004 PWS-STREET REPAIR MTN - 618.55 Voucher: 179438 393554 5/14/2004 PWS-STREET REPAIR MTN - 415.77 395218 5/18/2004 SWM-REPAIR & MTN-MUL T L 305.34 1,339,66 Page: 9 apChkLst OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 179439 5/28/2004 000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 16883846 Voucher: 179439 179440 5/28/2004 000966 INPRA-INTERNATIONAL NW FINPRA04 REUT 5/19/2004 Voucher: 179440 179441 5/28/2004 008026 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATI 208 Voucher: 179441 179442 5/28/2004 007321 J/RANDALL & ASSOCIATES 008 Voucher: 179442 179443 5/28/2004 008157 JACOBI, KATE Voucher: 179443 179444 5/28/2004 001815 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC 64140 L Voucher: 179444 .-- 179445 5/28/2004 001563 JDK SMALL ENGINE REPAIR 1175354 -.J Voucher: 179445 179446 5/28/2004 008158 JOEL, DANIEL Voucher: 179446 179447 5/28/2004 004096 JOHNSON CHRISTIE ANDRE 8029 Voucher: 179447 8030 8085 8031 5/4/04 Invoice 161339 161340 179448 5/28/2004 007370 KATHLEEN P DECKER MD Voucher: 179448 179449 5/28/2004 001259 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIM APRIL 04 Voucher: 179449 179450 5/28/2004 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIV 1300723 Voucher: 179450 1297503 179451 5/28/2004 005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DI202339 Voucher: 179451 179452 5/28/2004 000564 KING COUNTY PET LICENSE APRIL 04 Voucher: 179452 179453 5/28/2004 003898 KING COUNTY RADIO Voucher: 179453 303381 41604 41708 41732 41654 Inv Date Description 5/5/2004 MSMD-(4/5-5/5)COPIES MAl Amount Paid 1,778.84 15.00 42.50 960.00 150.00 606.60 10.88 150.00 7,333.00 1,531.50 655.50 142.50 175.00 1,145.69 37,820.70 29,359.64 381.84 430.00 4,574.70 547.52 129,54 128.32 90.75 Check Total 1,778.84 15.00 42.50 960.00 150.00 606.60 10.88 150.00 9,662.50 175.00 1,145,69 67,180.34 381.84 430.00 5,470.83 PKM-INPRA ANNUAL ASSOCI 5/13/2004 PS-04 BOWENS MBSHP DUE 5/6/2004 NEW CH-ROOF INSP & REPA 5/6/2004 PKRCS-REFUND-RECREA TI 4/26/2004 MSR-VEH KIT&SENSOR-LST I 2/11/2004 PWSWM-REPAIRIMAINTENA 5/6/2004 PKRCS-REFUND-RECREA TI 4/1/2004 AGOO-60C:4/14/04-PS LGL SV 4/14/2004 AGOO-60C:APR04-PS LGL SV 5/3/2004 AG04-05-PSA LEGAL SVCS- 4/1/2004 AGOO-60C:4/8/04-PS LGL SVC 5/7/2004 PS- FORENSIC C DEPT. 5/25/2004 MSF-4/04 REMIT CRIME VIC 4/21/2004 PS-{MARCH04) KING CO JAIL 3/19/2004 PS-{FEB04) KING CO JAIL 5/11/2004 PWSCIP-TRAFFIC SIGN (MO 5/25/2004 MSF-4/04 KC PET FEES REMI 3/31/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES- 3/25/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 3/25/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 3/25/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 3/25/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - Page: 10 apChkLst OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 179454 5/28/2004 000302 KING COUNTY RECORDS,ELE02-56230 Voucher: 179454 179455 5/28/2004 000201 KINKO'S lNG, ACCOUNT #020 515100072490 Voucher: 179455 515100072515 515100072550 515100072212 515100072503 515100072545 18377 179456 5/28/2004 006726 KISSINGER & FELLMAN P C Voucher: 179456 179457 5/28/2004 002128 KLEINS COMMERCIAL DOOR 1762 Voucher: 179457 179458 5/28/2004 004298 KOSOFF-ROACH, MELANIE E SPRING 2004 L Voucher: 179458 ëõ 179459 5/28/2004 008155 L'ARCHE Voucher: 179459 C2730R16210 Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid 5/18/2004 CD-NORTHSHORE KC RECO 85.00 5/11/2004 PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS 403.16 5/13/2004 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 320.96 5/17/2004 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 137.00 4/13/2004 PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS 124.03 5/12/2004 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 117.50 5/17/2004 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 76.16 4/20/2004 AG02-62B:3/25/04 LEGAL SV 39.00 5/13/2004 PKNCH-DOOR REPAIR SVCS 275,80 5/10/2004 AGO2-54:SPRG2004-GYMNA 2,877 .00 5/19/2004 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 277.04 Check Total 85.00 1,178.81 39,00 275,80 2,877,00 277.04 Page: 11 apChkLst OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 179460 5/28/2004 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI 1768602 Voucher: 179460 1639103 3075201 2913103 2926402 3075401 2926501 3075301 3238401 99902 3336301 3336201 2573402 3088801 2922503 3266301 2957001 3050801 101103 3033601 2961401 3042401 179461 5/28/2004 004052 LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP 01210410 Voucher: 179461 179462 5/28/2004 007050 LAW OFFICES OF HAL GEIE 28 Voucher: 179462 179463 5/28/2004 005478 LEBEL, SHELLEY . Voucher: 179463 L - -J) 179464 5/28/2004 007985 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC Voucher: 179464 179465 5/28/2004 008115 LINDELL, RAINY Voucher: 179465 179466 5/28/2004 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC Voucher: 179466 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 5/11/2004 PKDBC-3/04 SEWER SVCS - 439.06 5/11/2004 CHB-3/04 WTR/SWR SVCS 295.71 5/11/2004 PKCP-3/04 WATER/SEWER S 156.92 5/11/2004 PARAGON BLDG-3/04 WATE 142.83 5/11/2004 PKM-FAC 4/04 WATERISEWE 133.92 5/11/2004 PKCP-3/04 WATER/SEWER S 133.64 5/11/2004 PKM-FAC 4/04 WATERISEWE 98.28 5/11/2004 PKCP-3/04 WATERISEWER S 98.28 5/11/2004 PWS-3/04 WATER SVCS- 57.74 5/11/2004 PKM-FAC 3/04 WATERISEWE 15.68 5/11/2004 PWS-3/04 WATER SVCS- 14.48 5/11/2004 PWS-3/04 WATER SVCS- 14.48 5/11/2004 PWS-3/04 WATER SVCS- 14.48 4/19/2004 PWS-3/04 WATER SVCS- 14.48 5/11/2004 PARAGON BLDG-3/04 WATE 14.48 5/11/2004 PKM-FAC 3/04 WATERISEWE 14.48 5/11/2004 PKCP-3/04 WATER/SEWER S 14.48 5/11/2004 PKCP-3/04 W A TERISEWER S 14.48 5/11/2004 PKM-FAC 4/04 WATERISEWE 14.48 4/22/2004 PKM-FAC 3/04 WATERISEWE 14.48 5/11/2004 PWS-3/04 WATER SVCS- 14.48 5/19/2004 PWS-4/04 WATER SVCS- 14.48 1/19/2004 PS-SRT SAFETY EQUIPMEN 32.15 5/14/2004 AG02-125A:APR04-PUBLIC D 18,310.00 DANCE COSTU 5/3/2004 PRCS-DANCE COSTUMES F 123854 4/28/2004 PRCS-SEQUIN HATS FOR R EMPLOY REIM 5/15/2004 CDHS-VOL DIN CANDY SI04364 5/6/2004 KJP.POOL REPAIR SUPPLIE Check Total 1,745.82 32.15 18,310.00 911.38 63.42 100.00 357.41 ART EXH 71072 786.50 63.75 61.13 63.42 5/4/2004 PRCS-ART EXHIBIT 100.00 5/6/2004 PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL 357.41 Page: 12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179467 5/28/2004 007638 LORD, JULIE G EMPLOY REIM 5/13/2004 PRCS-5/1 0-5/12/04 MEAL RE 69.68 69,68 Voucher: 179467 179468 5/28/2004 001500 MACLEOD RECKORD ARCHI 3416 5/7/2004 AG04-35:APR04-SACAJAW E 4,115.10 Voucher: 179468 3417 5/7/2004 AG04-36:APR04-LAKOTA PR 3,604.05 7,719.15 179469 5/28/2004 001004 MAILMEDIA INC 43108 5/6/2004 KJP-FINAL POSTAGE FOR M 228.55 228.55 Voucher: 179469 179470 5/28/2004 005931 MAYER, JENNIFER EMPLOY REIM 5/7/2004 PRCS-POLAROID FILM-DAY ( 83.20 83,20 Voucher: 179470 179471 5/28/2004 008142 MCGAVICKGRAVES P S 25217 4/30/2004 CM-TRANSIT CNT REV LEGA 3,012.00 3,012.00 Voucher: 179471 179472 5/28/2004 006008 MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY C 0021828-IN 4/27/2004 PS-VEH#6261 & 6251 LIGHTS I 3,113.50 Voucher: 179472 0021569-IN 4/19/2004 PS-VEH#5101 & 5061 POLICE 356.75 3,470,25 L 179473 5/28/2004 005176 MERINO, BETTY 5/11/04 5/11/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 135,00 Voucher: 179473 5/18/04 5/18/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 90.00 225.00 ~ 179474 5/28/2004 003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTE 38975 4/25/2004 PKM-5/04 ALARM MON ITORIf\ 34.82 34,82 Voucher: 179474 179475 5/28/2004 006052 MOREDIRECT.COM, INC. 5880070 5/13/2004 MSDP/PS - PATROL CAR MI 138.83 Voucher: 179475 578134 5/7/2004 MSDP/PS - PC SCANNER ME 74.68 213.51 179476 5/28/2004 005004 MORRIS HANSEN ENTERPRI 12479 4/27/2004 PKDBC-WINDOW CLEANING 398.00 398.00 Voucher: 179476 179477 5/28/2004 001843 MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE ~1037-JUNE04 5/24/2004 AG98-212B:(JUN04)PS BLDG I 13,334.60 Voucher: 179477 1050-JUNE04 5/24/2004 AG99-139A:(JUN04)MC BLDG 6,964.00 1032-JUNE04 5/24/2004 AG98-212B:(JUN04)PS BLDG I 4,571.40 1042-JUNE04 5/24/2004 AG98-212B:(JUN04)PS BLDG I 3,106.00 3087-JUNE04 5/24/2004 AG93-51 :(JUN04)KLCC PKNG 509,90 28,485.90 179478 5/28/2004 000955 MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPAAB442893S 4/6/2004 PKM-CLA Y BASEBALL SLUG 334.66 334.66 Voucher: 179478 179479 5/28/2004 001902 MYERS MASTER LAWN CAR 726 5/6/2004 AG01-66A:(APR04)PKS LNDS 856.80 856.80 Voucher: 179479 179480 5/28/2004 001052 NAPA AUTO PARTS 757513 5/11/2004 PKM-FLEET REPAIR & MAIN 36.53 36.53 Voucher: 179480 179481 5/28/2004 003868 NATIONAL BARRICADE COMF82337 4/30/2004 MSFL T-VEHICLE REPAIRIMA 1,544.96 1,544.96 Voucher: 179481 179482 5/28/2004 003238 NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY 0045914 4/14/2004 PS-O4 LAW ENFORCEMENT [ 232.20 232.20 Voucher: 179482 Page: 13 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 14 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179483 5/28/2004 001215 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROU 651320845-00 5/11/2004 PWAD-UPTON,LEMASTER,K 417.00 417.00 Voucher: 179483 179484 5/28/2004 000089 NEWS TRIBUNE 420708 5/9/2004 PS-13 WKS NEWSPAPER SU 34.50 34.50 Voucher:. 179484 179485 5/28/2004 000891 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN84314851300 5/13/2004 PS-TONER E40 PC700 274.22 274.22 Voucher: 179485 179486 5/28/2004 003371 OFFICE TEAM 10998441 4/20/2004 CDA-4/16-0FFICE TEMP HEL 559.00 559.00 Voucher: 179486 179487 5/28/2004 000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 305663 4/20/2004 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 68.34 68.34 Voucher: 179487 179488 5/28/2004 000705 OSBORNE INNOVATIVE PRO 0008077-IN 5/10/2004 PKM-FIELD TURFACE 422.76 422.76 Voucher: 179488 179489 5/28/2004 005741 OUTCOMES BY LEVY APRIL 2004 4/30/2004 AG03-191:(APR04)LOBBYIST: 4,072.45 4,072.45 C-. Voucher: 179489 ~ 179490 5/28/2004 007708 P2CS CONSTRUCTION MANA-APRIL 2004 5/1/2004 AG03-189:APR04-CSTR CNSL 5,084.00 5,084.00 - Voucher: 179490 179491 ~28nO04 000112 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC FORD S34 4/30/2004 MSFL T -2004 FORD S34 VIN# 37,591.02 37,591.02 Voucher: 179491 179492 5/28/2004 004004 PACIFIC COAST FORD JNC APRIL 2004 4/21/2004 SUI-(APR04) VEH LEASE-200 274.41 274.41 Voucher: 179492 179493 5/28/2004 000315 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE 1565247 4/30/2004 PWST -TITLE REPORTS 467.84 Voucher: 179493 565224 4/30/2004 PWST-TITLE REPORTS 467.84 565252 5/4/2004 PWST-TITLE REPORTS 359.04 565251 5/4/2004 PWST -TITLE. REPORTS 359.04 565234 4/28/2004 PWST -TITLE REPORTS 359.04 565236 5/4/2004 PWST -TITLE REPORTS 359.04 565237 5/4/2004 PWST-TITLE REPORTS 359.04 565823 5/4/2004 PWST -TITLE REPORTS 359.04 412488 5/18/2004 PWST-TITLE REPORTS 65.28 3,155.20 179494 5/28/2004 001814 PARAMETRIX INC 10-30181 5/11/2004 AG02-109:CHRISTIAN FAITH ( 3,620.64 3.620.64 Voucher: 179494 179495 5/28/2004 008168 PATJENS,MARGARETJANE PATJENS 5/14/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 29.96 29,96 Voucher: 179495 179496 5/28/2004 001189 PETTY CASH - CM OFFICE MAY 2004 5/26/2004 PW-RECORDING FEES FOR J 441.49 441.49 Voucher: 179496 Page: 14 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 15 0512712004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179497 5/28/2004 001166 PETTY CASH - KLAHANEE KLCC 5/17/04 5/17/2004 PRCS-OJ, DONUTS, WATER I 274.20. 274.20 Voucher: 179497 179498 5/28/2004 007470 PETTY CASH - MGMT. SVC. MAY 2004 5/26/2004 SWM-PARKING REIMB DON F 493.20 493.20 Voucher: 179498 179499 5/28/2004 002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS M PKM 5/14/04 5/14/2004 PKM-SELF SERVICE CARWA 112.16 112,16 Voucher: 179499 179500 5/28/2004 005235 PETTY CASH-CHANGE FUND MAY 2004 5/26/2004 MUNI COURT CHANGE FUND 82.18 82,18 Voucher: 179500 179501 5/28/2004 002822 PETTY CASH-ÐUMAS BAY CE DBC 5/24/03 5/24/2004 PKDBC-DVD'S FOR GUEST U 147,84 147,84 Voucher: 179501 179502 5/28/2004 006241 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT PS 5/20/04 5/20/2004 PS-PER DIEM:TRAINING- 204.87 204.87 Voucher: 179502 C 179503 5/28/2004 002024 PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES MAY 2004 5/26/2004 MSF-MA Y04-REIM WITNESS I 475.65 475.65 Voucher: 179503 ~ 179504 5/28/2004 006993 PFX PET SUPPLY INC CD10037142 5/4/2004 PS-K9 FOOD EUK PFP LG BR 179.76 179.76 Voucher: 179504 179505 5/28/2004 003520 PHUNG, NOVA C 5/12/04 5/12/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 67.50 67,50 Voucher: 179505 179506 5/28/2004 001612 POLLARD PRINTING GROUP 166491 5/11/2004 MSHR-BUSINESS CARDS 169.89 169.89 Voucher: 179506 179507 5/28/2004 008153 POLYGON NORTHWEST 02-23943 5/12/2004 PW-RFND BOND REL#94-1 2,987.80 2,987.80 Voucher: 179507 179508 5/28/2004 005583 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 367145 4/28/2004 PKM-WELDING GAS- 16.06 Voucher: 179508 458230 4/20/2004 PKM-WELDING GAS- 8.93 24.99 179509 5/28/2004 004672 PRODUCTIONS NORTHWES 10350 5/16/2004 MIS-AN SYSTEM-CONSUL TII' 4,810.00 4,810.00 Voucher: 179509 179510 5/28/2004 004788 PROPERTY DAMAGE APPRA 494-356691 1/23/2004 MSR-LST DT 1/10/04 #04-01 176.70 Voucher: 179510 494-356702 1/23/2004 MSR-LST DT 1/10/04 #04-01 105.20 281,90 179511 5/28/2004 005824 PROVIDENT SERVICES 0012621-IN 4/30/2004 MC-CASSETTE TAPES & HAR 221.81 221,81 Voucher: 179511 Page: 15 apChkLst OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 16 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179513 5/28/2004 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 131-066-1002 4/30/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 11,816,71 Voucher: 179513 411-836-4779 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 2,235.99 128-255-2015 4/19/2004 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHRGS 542,85 250-275-5917 5/14/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 440.07 669-650-2001 5/14/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 306.68 128-255-3948 5/17/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 246.50 536-673-1007 4/30/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 245,16 458-148-1001 5/14/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 233.68 625-940-2003 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 222.22 487 -650-2008 5/14/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 211.32 141-467 -1006 5/13/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 194.54 411-836-9315 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 181.08 250-275-0389 5/17/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 177.58 904-388-1 003 5/14/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 169.38 330-694-9979 5/14/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 166.73 L. 604-130-2008 5/14/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 151.49 e 225-650-2002 5/17/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 146.38 895-405-1002 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 140.36 017-470-0088 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 137.31 925-940-2007 5/13/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 130.82 996-289-0001 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 128.42 652-017 -1007 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 123.99 373-087-1005 5/14/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 123.95 006-877 -3456 5/17/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 122.77 004-919-1000 5/17/2004 SWM-4/15-5/13/04-ELECTRIC 111 .06 720-429-1004 5/17/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC' 108.58 017-470-1375 5/14/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 106.00 733-930-2007 5/13/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 103.12 525-940-2005 5/13/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 102.46 497-198-1008 5/14/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 99.49 733-829-1003 5/13/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 97.81 100-093-8728 5/17/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 95,23 638-448-1005 4/30/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 83.21 472-400-1005 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 78.60 183-469-1006 5/17/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 77,14 Page: 16 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 17 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Dáte Description Amount Paid Check Total 738-448-1003 4/30/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 62.40 233-930-2008 5/13/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 58.34 177-437-1007 5/17/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 49.17 786-203-1007 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 46.42 873-272-3351 5/17/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 46.38 504-368-1005 5/14/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 44.15 889-288-1007 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 41.43 420-530-2005 5/14/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 41.02 755-430-2005 5/13/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 40.81 886-203-1005 5/13/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 40.59 252-150-2001 5/17/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 35.83 917-259-1001 5/17/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 35.54 C 017-470-7554 5/17/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 34.43 ~ 447-269-3177 5/14/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 30.21 359-540-2003 5/14/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 27.61 352-691-1007 4/30/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 27.24 442-691-1006 4/30/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 27.24 342-691-1008 4/30/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 25.11 357 -656-6131 4/16/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 16.58 357 -656-6131 5/17/2004 PWT -4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 14.89 062-691-1002 4/30/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 14.47 250-275-4910 4/22/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 14.45 017-470-5400 5/17/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRIC I 11.90 657 -289-0009 5/17/2004 PWT-4/15-5/13/04 ELECTRICI 6.26 121-220-2004 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 5.84 221-220-2002 4/20/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 5.84 20,462.83 179514 5/28/2004 000602 PUGET SOUND INSTRUMEN 421146 5/14/2004 MSDP/PW - REPLACEMENT F 818.07 818.07 Voucher: 179514 179515 5/28/2004 005977 PURE HEALTH SOLUTIONS I 31283 5/10/2004 PS-BOTTLED WATER SVC 391,68 391.68 Voucher: 179515 179516 5/28/2004 000202 QWEST 206~Z04-0609 5/4/2004 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 4,709.95 4,709.95 Voucher: 179516 179517 5/28/2004 006239 RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURINC187679 4/9/2004 PS-K-9 TRAINING SUPPLIES 116.85 116.85 Voucher: 179517 Page: 17 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 18 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179518 5/28/2004 006165 RENTON FISH & GAME CLUB NORMAN 04 5/17/2004 PS-04 C NORMAN MEMB REf\ 100.00 Voucher: 179518 1449 5/19/2004 PS-B SKINNER 04 MEMB REN 100.00 200.00 179519 5/28/2004 004317 RITZ CAMERA ONE HOUR PH 1026065410 4/16/2004 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 239.34 239.34 Voucher: 179519 179520 5/28/2004 006567 ROMANOFF, TAMMY K JURY REIMB M 5/17/2004 MC-5/17/04 JURY REIMBURSE 24.50 24.50 Voucher: 179520 179521 5/28/2004 005940 RUDDELL INTERNATIONAL TI-2292 4/22/2004 PS-EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES 264,88 Voucher: 179521 TI-2307 4/26/2004 PS-EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES 199.45 464.33 179522 5/28/2004 005703 SAFEWAY STORE #3501 648233 5/14/2004 PKRCS-FRIENDSHIP THEATE 66.93 66.93 Voucher: 179522 179523 5/28/2004 003426 SCHENKEL, KEITH SCHENKEL 5/24/2004 EMPLOYEE EXPENSES REI 324,80 324.80 C Voucher: 179523 EMPLOY REIM 4/18/2004 PARCS-5/18-5/23/04 04 BOAR 130.00 130.00 t'} 179524 5/28/2004 000409 SCHRODER, JENNIFER \A Voucher: 179524 070171006 5/4/2004 MSHR-4/11/04 NEWSPAPER J 2,205.31 2,205.31 179525 5/28/2004 000055 SEATTLE TIMES Voucher: 179525 179526 5/28/2004 000106 SELECT TRAVEL INC 405041021 5/4/2004 PS-AIRFARE-5/13-SUMPTER 672.90 Voucher: 179526 405051012 5/5/2004 PS-AIRFARE-5/16-SCHENKE 672.90 405041022 5/4/2004 PS-AIRFARE-5/16 NEAL AMEF 672.90 405051062 5/6/2004 PS-AIRFARE-6/2-AYERS UN I 465.20 404281029 4/28/2004 PS-AIRFARE-5/10-WILSON, K 390.40 2,874.30 179527 5/28/2004 008154 SELLEN CONSTRUCITON CO 02-45726 5/11/2004 PW-RFND BOND REL#01-1 11,859.03 Voucher: 179527 02-45646 5/11/2004 PW-RFND BOND REL#01-1 4,277.34 16,136.37 179528 5/28/2004 005340 SENIOR SERVICES OF SEAT APRIL 04 5/5/2004 PRCS-4/04 SR LUNCH PROGI 365.00 365,00 Voucher: 179528 179529 5/28/2004 000056 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI31674 5/13/2004 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 462.61 462.61 Voucher: 179529 179530 5/28/2004 008127 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI35514 4/16/2004 SWM-POSTCARDS ADV NO 53.85 Voucher: 179530 35486 4/14/2004 SWM-INSP RESL T POSTCAR 52.54 106.39 179531 5/28/2004 005528 SLETTE, ALICE MARIE SLETTE 5/18/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 13.79 13.79 Voucher: 179531 179532 5/28/2004 003340 SMITH PHD, DAVID H 595 5/4/2004 PS-PRE-EMPL Y PSYCH EVA 375.00 375.00 Voucher: 179532 Page: 18 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 19 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179533 5/28/2004 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC 12417 5/12/2004 PRCS-2004 SUMM BROC PR 5,309.66 Voucher: 179533 015530 4/3/2004 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 212.40 015582 4/10/2004 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 212.40 5,734.46 179534 5/28/2004 007617 SOUTH CAMPUS PLACE LLC 02-42546 5/12/2004 PW-RFND CASH DEP #00-1 1,422.00 1,422.00 Voucher: 179534 179535 5/28/2004 001885 SPARKS CAR CARE 13122 4/14/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 741.85 Voucher: 179535 13176 4/23/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 420.61 13256 5/4/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 387.36 13234 4/30/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 320,14 13188 4/24/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 227.45 13285 5/8/2004 MSFTL-AG03-157 VHCS MNT 80.48 13225 4/28/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 48.93 2,226.82 C 179536 5/28/2004 003735 ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL CASE#03-1817 1/17/2004 PS-HUGHES,R MED EXAM 400.00 400.00 Voucher: 179536 ~ 179537 5/28/2004 003307 STERICYCLE INC 0002768225 4/30/2004 PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 10.96 10.96 Voucher: 179537 179538 5/28/2004 005921 STL SEATTLE 58018191 5/11/2004 SWM-WATER QUALITY TES 226.50 Voucher: 179538 58018172 5/10/2004 SWM-W A TER QUALITY ANA 180.00 58018192 5/11/2004 SWM-LABORATORY TESTI 147.00 553.50 179539 5/28/2004 005891 SUDDEN IMAGE INC 3094 5/11/2004 PS-APR 04 PHOTO SERVICE 1,367.45 1,367.45 Voucher: 179539 179540 5/28/2004 004356 SUMPTER, KYLE EMPLOY REIM 4/24/2004 PS-EARPLUGS FOR SRT HEP 64.41 64.41 Voucher: 179540 179541 5/28/2004 000341 SUNRISE SELF STORAGE 613343 5/1/2004 PS-6/04 STRG RENTAL FEE L 170.00 170,00 Voucher: 179541 179542 5/28/2004 002521 SUPERLON PLASTICS INC 04F2174 4/29/2004 SWM-REPAIR AND MAINTE 143.67 143.67 Voucher: 179542 179543 5/28/2004 002176 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCT 15772410 5/17/2004 PKNCH-REPAIR SUPPLIES 34.42 34.42 Voucher: 179543 179544 5/28/2004 001601 T AK INC 6413-B 4/15/2004 PW-HOV LANES INSERT IN N 2,284.80 2,284.80 Voucher: 179544 179545 5/28/2004 001187 TECHNOLOGY EXPRESS 131453 4/28/2004 2003 LLEBG GRANT-SONY D 33,323.40 Voucher: 179545 131637 5/10/2004 MSDP - PC MEMORY- 1,094.45 34,417.85 179546 5/28/2004 702305 TERRY JENSEN CONSTRUCT01-38295 5/12/2004 PWS-RFND ROW PRMT #0 222,00 222,00 Voucher: 179546 Page: 19 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 20 OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179547 5/28/2004 006033 THE FAB SHOP LLC Z-2245 5/19/2004 MSFL T-REPAIRS SVC 2,161.77 Voucher: 179547 Z-2246 5/19/2004 PWS-STREET MAINTENANC 565,76 Z-2245A 5/19/2004 MSR-LST DT 10/22/03 #03-0 565,76 3,293.29 179548 5/28/2004 007758 THESUPPLYSOURCE~C 304461 3/10/2004 PS-HOUSEHOULD ITEMS 80.19 80.19 Voucher: 179548 179549 5/28/2004 008159 THOMPSON, SHELLEY 03-45771 5/7/2004 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 75.00 75.00 Voucher: 179549 179550 5/28/2004 004218 TIMCO INC 110207 5/12/2004 PWST-REPAIR SUPPLIES; N 55.00 55.00 Voucher: 179550 179551 5/28/2004 005059 TIRE DISPOSAL & RECYCLIN 75811 3/27/2004 PWSWR-TIRE RECYCLING E 132.48 132.48 Voucher: 179551 L 179552 5/28/2004 005321 TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES 4954176 5/5/2004 PS-4/04 VEH FUEL-BRIAN WI 90.75 90.75 N Voucher: 179552 -J 179553 5/28/2004 001715 TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN 433154 4/27/2004 PKDBC-PESTICIDE SPRAYIN 217.60 217.60 Voucher: 179553 179554 5/28/2004 003572 TUCKER, CURTIS TUCKER 5/18/2004 PS-EXPLORER MTG 5/17/04 F 146.95 146.95 Voucher: 179554 179555 5/28/2004 008129 US LATEX PRODUCTS INC 3105J 3/11/2004 PS- TEX LATEX GLOVES 221,68 Voucher: 179555 4124 4/14/2004 PS- TEX LATEX GLOVES 221.68 443.36 179556 5/28/2004 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 000F80F48194 5/8/2004 PS-DELIVERY SERVICE 21.46 21.46 Voucher: 179556 179557 5/28/2004 000769 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO I 6219334 5/7/2004 PKM-MAXI COM TRNG/RICHE 223.15 Voucher: 179557 6220165 5/7/2004 PKM-MAXI COM TRNG/RICHE 125.00 6206410 4/30/2004 PKM-MAXI COM TRNG/RICHE 34.24 382.39 179558 5/28/2004 005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE40221930-001 4/30/2004 PKM-EQUIPMENT RENTAUA 228.48 228.48 Voucher: 179558 179559 5/28/2004 005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE40554362-001 5/14/2004 PWS-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPL 36.72 Voucher: 179559 40673192-001 5/19/2004 PWS-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPL 12.52 49.24 Page: 20 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 21 OS/2712004 2:52:46PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179560 5/28/2004 007357 UNITED REPROGRAPHICS 0063327-IN 4/21/2004 CM-PRINTING, BINDING OF A 204.01 Voucher: 179560 0063390-IN 4/28/2004 CM-PRINTING, BINDING OF A 125.27 0063392-IN 4/26/2004 CM-PRINTING, BINDING OF A 99.56 00606493-IN 4/19/2004 CM-PRINTING, BINDING OF A 61.04 0063314-IN 4/19/2004 CM-PRINTING, BINDING OF A 42.44 0063389-IN 4/26/2004 CM-PRINTING, BINDING OF A 25.29 0064032-IN 4/30/2004 CM-PRINTING, BINDING OF A 20.95 0042711-IN 4/28/2004 CM-PRINTING, BINDING OF A 10.67 589.23 179561 5/28/2004 001512 URESCO CONSTRUCTION M 001-192841 5/11/2004 PKNCH-1X4,1X6,1X10 RIPP 8,723.83 8,723.83 Voucher: 179561 C- 179562 5/28/2004 004552 VALLEY CITIES COUNSELING 1ST QTR 2004 4/12/2004 AG03-77:1QTR04 DVTREAT~ 1,250.00 1,250.00 ~ Voucher: 179562 çy 179563 5/28/2004 004863 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION SU 65754 4/24/2004 NEW CH-CONCRETE SUPPL 66.42 66.42 Voucher: 179563 179564 5/28/2004 000618 VERDICON SO01310131.0 5/6/2004 PKM-GRASS SEEDIINV#SOO 1,156.00 Voucher: 179564 SO01324243.0 5/5/2004 PKM-GRASS SEED/INV#SOO 718.08 1,874.08 179565 5/28/2004 001124 VERIZON WIRELESS 1860137551 5/6/2004 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 80.43 80.43 Voucher: 179565 179566 5/28/2004 006278 VISUAL EFFECTS 13270 4/14/2004 PS- WINDOW TINTING 544.00 Voucher: 179566 13272 4/15/2004 PS-2004 DODGE STRANS-WII 261.12 805.12 179567 5/28/2004 005542 VWR SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 18243313 4/14/2004 PS-ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIP 86,15 86.15 Voucher: 179567 179568 5/28/2004 000094 WA STATE AUDITOR'S OFFI L49298 5/16/2004 MSF-4/04 STATE AUDITOR S 9,195,75 9,195,75 Voucher: 179568 179569 5/28/2004 000340 WA STATE INFORMATION S 2004040208 5/4/2004 MSTEL-4/04 SCAN SERVICE 963.52 963,52 Voucher: 179569 179570 5/28/2004 000253 WA STATE TRANSPORTATIO GSJK61620100 4/8/2004 PWSCIP-AERIAL PHOTO OF I 1,399.02 Voucher: 179570 ABTB40511124 5/11/2004 PWSCIP-SR-99 HOV LANES, I 711.62 ATB40113182 1/13/2004 PWSCIP-S 288TH ST TO MI 68.54 A TB40511100 5/11/2004 PWSCIP-SR-99 HOV LANES, I 53.66 ATB40413196 4/13/2004 PWSCIP-PACIFIC HWY SO H 37.57 2,270.41 179571 5/28/2004 000514 WA STATE-STATE REVENUE APRIL 04 5/25/2004 MSF-4/04 REMIT STATE FEE 66,297.45 66,297.45 Voucher: 179571 179572 5/i8/2004 006853 WAHl, PRAN 5/11/04 5/11/2004 MC-5/04 INTERPRETER SVC 120.00 120.00 Voucher: 179572 Page: 21 apChkLst OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 22 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179573 5/28/2004 000067 WALDRON RESOURCES WR04-128 5/17/2004 MSF-5/3-5/14/04 SEN FIN AC 1,920.00 1,920.00 Voucher: 179573 179574 5/28/2004 006007 WALKER ACE HARDWARE 000291 5/7/2004 PKDBC-CONST TOOLS/EQP F 41.31 Voucher: 179574 000294 5/12/2004 PKM-GRD:CNSTRCTN TOOL 13.92 55.23 179575 5/28/2004 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT 3272004 4/1/2004 SWR-LABOR, EQUIPMENT, T 8,459.24 8,459.24 Voucher: 179575 1795765/28/2004 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT 0040731-1055 5/1/2004 PW SW R-LiTTER DISPOSAL 337.44 337.44 Voucher: 179576 179577 5/28/2004 000173 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 806566770 4/30/2004 MSDP-4/04 DATABASE ACCE 1,169.87 1,169.87 Voucher: 179577 179578 5/28/2004 008133 WESTERN MASONRY INC AG04-38 #1 4/16/2004 AG04-38:NEW CH-MASONRY 39,207.34 39,207.34 Voucher: 179578 ~. 179579 5/28/2004 004806 WESTERN STATES AUTO T 52491 5/5/2004 PS-MAY04-AUTO THEFT INV 250.00 250.00 ~ Voucher: 179579 179580 5/28/2004 008169 WIESE, ALICE M WIESE 5/17/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 75.12 75.12 Voucher: 179580 179581 5/28/2004 002204 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 24-131752 5/10/2004 PKM-GRASS SEED/PRO STA 308.45 308.45 Voucher: 179581 179582 5/28/2004 005680 WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL 3215 4/30/2004 PS-FIRING RANGE FEE SVC 165.35 165,35 Voucher: 179582 179583 5/28/2004 007379 WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LO3-02A-10 4/30/2004 AG03-43:APR04-ARMSTRON 5,771.63 Voucher: 179583 03-02B-12 4/30/2004 AG03-44:APR04- THOMPSON 2,818.15 8,589.78 179584 5/28/2004 001206 WSSUA-WA STATE SOFTBA 10 5/3/2004 AG02-77:S0FTBALL UMPIRE 2,000.00 2,000.00 Voucher: 179584 179585 5/28/2004 006062 WSTOA-WASHINGTON ST T 03/04 SRT MB 1/20/2004 PS-03/04 SRT VALLEY RES PC 150.00 150.00 Voucher: 179585 179586 5/28/2004 001121 WWEE-WA WOMEN EMPLO 1STQTR2004 5/10/2004 AG03-80:1QTR2004 REACH P 4,750.00 Voucher: 179586 1 STQTR2004 5/10/2004 AG03-83:1QTR2004 CACD P 1,500.00 6,250.00 179587 5/28/2004 008036 YWCA SOUTH KING COUNTY 1 STQTR2004 4/27/2004 AG03-129A:1QTR04 DV CHIL 500.00 500.00 Voucher: 179587 179588 5/28/2004 005864 ZONES INC P29551300101 5/13/2004 MSDP/SIU-SONY DIGITAL C 58.76 58.76 Voucher: 179588 179589 5/28/2004 008160 ZWICKI, JUSTIN 03-45750 5/7/2004 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 75.00 75.00 Voucher: 179589 Page: 22 apChkLst OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 23 Sub total for us bank: 793,548.17 L- ~ 0 Page: 23 apChkLst OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 24 793,548.17 246 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: c ~ Page: 24 apChkLst OS/27/2004 2:52:46PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 25 Bank code: key Check # Date 179367 5/27/2004 179512 5/27/2004 520662 12/16/2003 L \.}j ~ Page: 25 apChkLst 0611112004 2:32:12PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 3076 OS/20/2004 AG02-48:5/04 PS JANITORIAL 787,50 3078 OS/20/2004 AGOO-15C:5/04 MC JANITORI 349.50 1,137.00 Sub total for us bank: 1,137.00 179595 06/11/2004 000947 YOUR INC Voucher: 179595 c ~ "-N Page: 1 apChkLst 06/11/2004 2:32:12PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 1 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,137,00 L ~ ---+- Page: 2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179590 6/3/2004 000302 KING COUNTY RECORDS,ELE02-56423 6/3/2004 CD-GL GRIFFIN KC RECORDI 91.00 91.00 Voucher: 179590 179591 6/4/2004 008175 SEATTLE PASSPORT AGENC E PETERSON 5/15/2004 MSF-EXPEDITE EDDIE PETE 60.00 60.00 Voucher: 179591 179592 6/7/2004 001553 KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REANNEXATIONS 6/4/2004 CD-SW PARKWAY BOUNDAR 150.00 150,00 Voucher: 179592 179593 6/7/2004 008180 MC DONALDS CORP SRT LUNCH 6/7/2004 PS-SRT MEALS FOR RESPO~ 239,91 239,91 Voucher: 179593 179594 6/8/2004 007991 SMS CLEANING 1111 4/23/2004 AG04-19:(APR04) KLCC JNTR 780,00 780.00 Voucher: 179594 179596 6/15/2004 003182 AACE LOCKBOX 4666 AACE100322 5/21/2004 CDB-B CRUZ AACE MEMBER: 60.00 60.00 L Voucher: 179596 179597 6/15/2004 000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I 0079669-1 5/28/2004 LEGAL MESSENGER SERVIC 101.00 ~ Voucher: 179597 7052583-1 5/14/2004 LEGAL MESSENGER SERVIC 7.50 108.50 \,j\ 179598 6/15/2004 004234 ABT TOWING OF FEDERAL W10316 5/13/2004 PS-TOWING SVCS 248.00 Voucher: 179598 10211 4/30/2004 PS-TOWING SVCS 134.91 382,91 179599 6/15/2004 000385 ACCOUNTEMPS 11196846 5/26/2004 MSF-5/21/04 TEMP OFFICE H 1,960.00 Voucher: 179599 11233424 6/2/2004 MSF-(5/28/04) TEMP OFFICE I 1,960.00 11158280 5/19/2004 MSF-(5/14/04) TEMP OFFICE I 1,960,00 5,880.00 179600 6/15/2004 001856 ACTION SERVICES CORPORP48034 5/31/2004 AGOO-6C:MAY04 STREET SW 2,961.20 2,961,20 Voucher: 179600 179601 6/15/2004 000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 13499 5/26/2004 PWS-PADLOCK FOR VMS S 189.43 Voucher: 179601 13470 4/2/2004 PRCS-FACILITY LOCKSMITH 102.90 13503 6/1/2004 PKM-FACILITY LOCKSMITH S 84.98 13476 4/13/2004 PKRCS-LOCKSMITH SVCS 3.00 380.31 179602 6/15/2004 005003 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODU 1000015978 4/30/2004 PWTR- TRAFFIC SUPPLIES; E 172.20 172.20 Voucher: 179602 179603 6/15/2004 000568 AGRI SHOP INC 192492 5/6/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 200.31 Voucher: 179603 196889 5/26/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 162,18 196863 5/26/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 96.16 192495 5/6/2004 PKM-HONDA MOWER PARTS 33.62 196758 5/25/2004 PKM-HONDA GATOR SUPPL 18.01 510,28 179604 6/15/2004 000475 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM S 2910038-000 4/20/2004 PKRCS-5/04 ALRM MNTR SV 59.74 Voucher: 179604 2910038-000 5/20/2004 PKRCS-(MTH04 )ALRM MNTR 59.74 119.48 Page: 1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179605 6/15/2004 001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-63293 - 5/26/2004 PWTR-FACILITY CLEANING S 102.49 102.49 Voucher: 179605 179606 6/15/2004 001110 AMAYA ELECTRIC 7079-14 5/28/2004 PKDBC-ELECTRICAL SERVI 454.35 454.35 Voucher: 179606 179607 6/15/2004 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIO D6416 6/1/2004 SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 194.14 Voucher: 179607 D6417 6/1/2004 PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 126.85 320.99 179608 6/15/2004 003645 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SVC 3405 6/4/2004 AG04-09:(MA Y04) DBC JNTR 5,823.45 Voucher: 179608 3406 6/4/2004 AG04-09:(MA Y04 )KFT JNTRL : 950.00 3407 6/4/2004 AG04-09:(MA Y04 )PKM JNTRL 680.00 7,453.45 179609 6/15/2004 001522 AMERICAN RED CROSS 10003058 5/25/2004 PRKJP-LlGEGUARD & FIT TR 78.00 L Voucher: 179609. 10002945 5/14/2004 PRKJP-LiFEGUARD TRNG & ( 18.00 96.00 ~ 179610 6/15/2004 003129 AMS LASER SUPPLY 08319A 1 5/28/2004 MSDP-PRINTER TONER- 409.86 ~ Voucher: 179610 08160A 1 5/24/2004 MSDP-PRINTER TONER- -89.76 07328A 1 5/7/2004 MSDP-PRINTER TONER- -154.95 165.15 179611 6/15/2004 008171 APPLE APPRAISAL ASSOC I 01-53154 5/28/2004 MSF-REFUND ON OVERPAYf\ 28.75 28.75 Voucher: 179611 179612 6/15/2004 002534 ARBORSCAN INC 4874 5/25/2004 PKM-HAZARDOUS TREES R 680.00 Voucher: 179612 4875 5/25/2004 PKM-HAZARDOUS TREES R 609.28 4900 6/1/2004 PKM-HAZARDOUS TREES R 244.80 1,534,08 179613 6/15/2004 005715 ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS N6163838F 6/2/2004 MSTE~PAGERLEASE(PER 410.18 410,18 Voucher: 179613 179614 6/15/2004 008135 ARCMATE MANUFACTURING 34779 5/17/2004 PKM-ORANG-U- TONGS 181,75 181.75 Voucher: 179614 179615 6/15/2004 008199 ARNOLD, RICHARD ARNOLD 6/1/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 41.59 41.59 Voucher: 179615 179616 6/15/2004 000437 ASSOCIATED COURIERS INC 158601 5/24/2004 SWM-COURIER SERVICES; 0 27,81 27.81 Voucher: 179616 179617 6/15/2004 001233 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE 030429011500 5/16/2004 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 106.43 106.43 Voucher: 179617 179618 6/15/2004 000075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 120405718 6/2/2004 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME- 90.76 90.76 Voucher: 179618 179619 6/15/2004 000075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 0033654119 5/28/2004 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME- 26.45 26.45 Voucher: 179619 Page: 2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179620 6/15/2004 008108 AVNET INC 87053524 5/18/2004 MSDP/NB/NTWK-4500 CHASS 29,500.57 Voucher: 179620 87215047 6/4/2004 MSDP/NB/NTWK-24X7X4 SV 1,914.88 86990737 5/13/2004 MSDP/NB/NTWK-SHORT GB 1,653.76 33,069.21 179621 6/15/2004 008178 AYRES, RICHARD M 2004-129 6/4/2004 PS-ETHICAL,CHRT-DRIVEN L 2,046.84 2,046.84 Voucher: 179621 179622 6/15/2004 004128 BAGNELL INC 7075 4/29/2004 CD-L T AC EXPLORE FW FL YE 293.67 293.67 Voucher: 179622 179623 6/15/2004 008191 BAKKER, RIA 165103 6/2/2004 PKRCS-REFUND-RECREA TI 58,00 58.00 Voucher: 179623 179624 6/15/2004 000792 BARRY'S TRUCKING & LAND 165953 5/26/2004 PKNCHB-DEBRI REMOVAL 4,497.00 Voucher: 179624 165951 5/20/2004 PKM-LANDSCAPE SERVICES 2,012,80 L 165952 5/20/2004 PKM-4/04-356TH PK L T, 348T 1,305.60 7,815.40 '-j~ 179625 6/15/2004 008200 BERRISFORD, RICHARD G BERRISFORD 6/4/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 131.65 131.65 ~ Voucher: 179625 179626 6/15/2004 003440 BILL HATCH SPORTS 95420-00 2/29/2004 PRCS-DIGITIMER & CARRIN 636.40 636.40 Voucher: 179626 179627 6/15/2004 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO 1359181-01 5/6/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 284.95 Voucher: 179627 367003 5/7/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 234.90 361701-01 5/6/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 152.21 367772 5/10/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 134.86 362893 5/5/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 47.27 365178 5/6/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 45.70 366698 5/7/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 39.17 364573 5/6/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 38.03 366704 5/7/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 26.11 366869 5/10/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 13.06 366138 5/6/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 10.88 367598 5/10/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE 6.53 360781-81 CR 5/5/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE -29.32 366556CR 5/5/2004 PS-UNIFORM & ACCESORIE -87,96 916,39 163334 5/20/2004 PKRCS-REFUND-RECREA TI 30,00 30.00 6/2/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 14,09 14.09 179628 6/15/2004 006981 BOOTH, STACEY Voucher: 179628 179629 6/15/2004 008201 BRADLEY, DELORES J Voucher: 179629 BRADLEY Page: 3 apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 Bank: key us bank (Continued) BRUNS Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 6/7/2004 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D 87.50 87.50 6/2/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVC 628.97 628.97 5/7/2004 PS-RADIO HOLDERS SAFE # 326.40 326.40 6/4/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 55.02 55.02 5/25/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 51.41 51.41 6/9/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 33.59 33.59 6/1/2004 MSFL T-2004 CHEV IMPALA- 18,198.74 6/9/2004 MSFL T-2004 CHEV IMPLA 2 18,198.74 36,397.48 5/20/2004 AG03-143A:PSA-OL YMPIC P 127.50 127.50 Check # Date Vendor Invoice 179630 6/15/2004 008192. BRESSLER, KATHY Voucher: 179630 179631 6/15/2004 004866 BRIM TRACTOR COMPANY I 8160 Voucher: 179631 179632 6/15/2004 003298 BRODSKY'S UNIFORM & EQU 5862 Voucher: 179632 179633 6/15/2004 008203 BROUWERS, JEANNETT Voucher: 179633 179634 6/15/2004 008202 BROWN, MARY MAUGHAN BROWN Voucher: 179634 179635 6/15/2004 008204 BRUNS, NEL L Voucher: 179635 L. 179636 6/15/2004 005801 BUD CLARY CHEVROLET, OL 2832 \.j~ Voucher: 179636 3072 cF-- 179637 6/15/2004 007578 BULLIV ANT HOUSER BAILEY 401681 Voucher: 179637 165747 BROUWERS Page: 4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179638 6/15/2004 000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN 8112 5/25/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 1,310.24 Voucher: 179638 8174 6/1/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 1,073.12 8181 6/1/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 949.76 8170 6/1/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 942.02 8171 6/1/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 916.82 8182 6/1/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 876,98 8185 6/1/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 863.28 8180 6/1/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 861.00 8172 6/1/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 509.20 8183 6/1/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 476,00 8175 6/1/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 367,20 8178 6/1/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 354.48 8173 6/1/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 340.00 L 8177 6/1/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 338.40 8164 5/31/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 327,60 ~ 8184 6/1/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 325.44 ~ 8169 6/1/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 285,75 8129 5/27/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 238.00 8128 5/27/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 172.40 8179 6/1/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 140.40 8077 5/18/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 122.40 8176 6/1/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 122.40 8078 5/18/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 81.60 8168 6/1/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 81,60 8127 5/27/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 58,20 8113 5/25/2004 DBC-CA TERING SVC 54.40 8165 5/31/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 51,00 8166 5/31/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC 24,90 8130CR 5/27/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC -33,95 8163CR 6/4/2004 DBC-CATERING SVC -401,80 11 ,828.84 179639 6/15/2004 000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC 303588221 4/22/2004 PKRLS-MTG COFFEE SUPPL 72,00 72,00 Voucher: 179639 179640 6/15/2004 003403 CASCADE SAWING & DRILL 75248 5/19/2004 NEW CH-CONCRETE DRILL 1,914,88 1,914,88 Voucher: 179640 Page: 5 apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 179641 6/15/2004 005573 CDW GOVERNMENT INC Voucher: 179641 179642 6/15/2004 004676 CENTERSTAGE THEATRE ARAPRIL 12,200 Voucher: 179642 179643 6/15/2004 004359 CENTURY SQUARE SELF-S 5832 Voucher: 179643 179644 6/15/2004 001481 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 3467199 Voucher: 179644 3464485 .3464666 6/4/04 179645 6/15/2004 005712 CHANG, JENNY Voucher: 179645 L 179646 6/15/2004 000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK# 2166 .-r: Voucher: 179646 CK# 2160 CJ CK# 2164 CK# 2167 AG04-25 #2 AG04-58 #2 AG04-26 #3 7334 AG04-43 #3 AG04-86 #1 0000988 0000897 F-04-1003 8228 RI 1472 179647 6/15/2004 000951 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Voucher: 179647 179648 6/15/2004 005817 CITY OF FIFE Voucher: 179648 179649 6/15/2004 003551 CITY OF KENT Voucher: 179649 179650 6/15/2004 008181 CITY OF SEATTLE Voucher: 179650 Invoice NC97493 45486 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 5/20/2004 MSDP/PS/03LLEBG-HP CLR P 6,500.00 6/7/2004 CDED - 2004 TEG GRANT 3,000.00 5/22/2004 PKM-6 MONTH STORAGE RE 962.50 5/24/2004 AG03-152:APR04-PAC HWY S 44,658.45 4/29/2004 AG03-200:MAR04-1-5 TO CITY 25,487.32 4/30/2004 AG03-152:MAR04-PAC HWY ~ 16,042.91 6/4/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 35.00 6/3/2004 MIS-JUN04-CTAC CONF-RYSI 580.56 5/13/2004 PS-MA Y04-MACA CONF-LAN[ 531.20 6/2/2004 PS-JUN04-ECO CRM SUMMIT 233.75 6/7/2004 PW-JUNE04-AOR CONF-VAN 93.00 5/31/2004 AG04-25:RET-D L HENRICKSE 11,789.10 6/5/2004 AG04-58:RET HELD-SANDER 7,799.91 5/31/2004 AG04-26:RET-VECA ELECTRI 5,020.00 5/31/2004 AG03-141 :RET HELD-STRIPE 2,307.63 6/1/2004 AG04-43:RET HELD-EMERAL 812.50 4/30/2004 AG04-86:RTNG-GUDMUNDS 774.86 4/27/2004 PS-3/04 JAIL SVCS AG01-72 29,737.35 4/27/2004 PS-2/04 JAIL SVCS AG01-72 22,992.00 3/1/2004 PS-3/01/04 HL THCARE JAIL S 375.00 3/25/2004 PS-3/04 JAIL SVCS MEDICA TI 64,35 5/10/2004 MSFL T-VHC #FW506 FLEET ~ 1,828.58 3/16/2004 AG04-27: MAVINE SHORELIN 3,856.00 Check Total 6,500.00 3,000.00 962.50 86,188.68 35.00 1,438,51 28,504.00 53,168.70 1,828,58 3,856,00 Page: 6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total . 179651 6/15/2004 003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA T1362528 5/25/2004 PKCP-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLI 277.68 Voucher: 179651 T1360518 5/20/2004 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI 230,67 T1363393 5/27/2004 PKCP-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLI 222,99 T1358631 5/14/2004 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 126,12 T1359454 5/18/2004 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 124,88 T1347914 4/20/2004 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 89,63 T1351739 4/28/2004 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 80,54 T1357748-1 5/17/2004 PKDBC-HOUSEHOLD SUPPL 66,39 T1359454-1 5/19/2004 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 32,62 1,251,52 179652 6/15/2004 001969 CODE PUBLISHING COMPAN 22448 6/3/2004 MSC-CODIFICATION SVCS 76.16 76,16 Voucher: 179652 179653 6/15/2004 007591 COMMERCIAL SPACE ONLI 65537 6/1/2004 CD-JUN04-PROPERTY DTB S 100,00 100,00 L Voucher: 179653 r- 179654 6/15/2004 002790 CONSTRUCTION TESTING L 10155 5/18/2004 PKNCHB-INSPECTIONS 155,10 155.10 ~ Voucher: 179654 - 179655 6/15/2004 000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC 16973 5/24/2004 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS 253,61 Voucher: 179655 15860 5/13/2004 SWM-CRUSHED ROCK 111,79 365.40 179656 6/15/2004 000771 COSTCO/HRS USA MA Y2004 5/26/2004 MAY04-COSTCO SUPPLIES 785,32 785.32 Voucher: 179656 179657 6/15/2004 008187 CRESCENT HOMES 02-54599 6/1/2004 PWS-RFND ROW PRMT #0 2,450,00 2,450,00 Voucher: 179657 179658 6/15/2004 005360 DC WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATE 6/1/04 6/1/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 100.00 Voucher: 179658 179659 6/15/2004 007946 D L HENRICKSEN CO INC AG04-25 #2 5/31/2004 AG04-25:NEW CH-PARTITION 244,741,72 244,741.72 Voucher: 179659 179660 6/15/2004 000168 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMER3155276 5/26/2004 SWM- NOTICE OF RFB #04 547.40 547.40 Voucher: 179660 179661 6/15/2004 008146 DAL TILE CORP 313-74494 6/11/2004 PKNCHB-TILE FOR NEW CI 4,885.98 4,885.98 Voucher: 179661 179662 6/15/2004 008205 DECKER, MILDRED FRANCE DECKER 6/4/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 36,35 36.35 Voucher: 179662 179663 6/15/2004 000578 DETAIL PLUS 12150 5/19/2004 MSFL T-VEHICLE DETAILING: 353.60 353.60 Voucher: 179663 Page: 7 apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 179664 6/15/2004 005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA 5/25/04 Voucher: 179664 6/1/04 6/2/04 6/4/04 35763 35930 AG03-101 # AG01-63 #1 8156771-15 8041813-15 7701395-15 10695964 179665 6/15/2004 007277 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC Voucher: 179665 179666 6/15/2004 005842 DPK INC Voucher: 179666 179667 6/15/2004 000939 DS WATERS OF AMERICA, L Voucher: 179667 C 179668 6/15/2004 005399 DYNA SYSTEMS -.c:- Voucher: 179668 N \ Inv Date Description Amount Paid 5/25/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 200.00 6/1/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 6/2/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 80.00 6/4/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 80.00 4/21/2004 PS-EQUIPMENT 550.00 5/31/2004 PS-EQUIPMENT 225.00 5/15/2004 AG03-101B:PAC HWY HaV L 631,731.36 4/7/2004 AG01-63E:(XX/03) 23RD S RD 87,018.14 4/20/2004 KJP-WTR CLR RNTL ACCT#4 60.46 4/1/2004 PKRLS-WTR/CLR RNTL ACC 44.86 2/28/2004 PKRLS-WTR/CLR RNTL ACC 12,86 4/30/2004 MSFL T-ELECTRICAUHARDW 178,36 Check Total 460,00 775.00 718,749.50 118.18 178,36 Page: 8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179669 6/15/2004 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE 11034181 5/4/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 1,232.92 Voucher: 179669 1034358 5/13/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 811.99 1034246 5/7/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 648.15 1034810 6/5/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 319.56 1034703 5/29/2004 MSFL T-REPAI R/SVC/TI RES 310.14 1034803 6/5/2004 MSFL T-REPAI R/SVC/TI RES 273.40 1034374 5/13/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 269.65 1034541 5/21/2004 MSFL T-REPAI R/SVC/TI RES 229.45 1034563 5/22/2004 MSFL T-REPAI R/SVC/TI RES 140.30 1034805 6/5/2004 MSFL T-REPAI R/SVC/TI RES 135.77 1033039 3/9/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 124.08 1034193 5/5/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 104,98 1034704 5/29/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 103,35 L 1034294 5/10/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 71.43 -C... 1034184 5/4/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 70,78 ~ 1034307 5/10/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 48,82 1034800 6/5/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/SVC/TIRES 29.96 1034683 5/28/2004 MSFL T-REPAI R/SVC/TI RES 27.19 1034739 6/1/2004 MSFL T-REPAI R/SVC/TI RES 27,19 1034296 5/10/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 26.52 1034225 5/6/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 18.49 1034252 5/7/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 18.49 1034328 5/11/2004 PS-AUTO REPAIR/SVC/TIRE 18.49 5,061,10 179670 6/15/2004 008141 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 2524949 5/4/2004 PWS-RISER/COVER FOR OV 130.56 130.56 Voucher: 179670 179671 6/15/2004 007133 ECO-PAN LLC 2004-1273 5/21/2004 PWS-CONCRETE RECLAIM 168.64 168,64 Voucher: 179671 179672 6/15/2004 003948 EDGEWOOD FIREPLACE SH 23114 5/21/2004 PWS-EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-" 83.67 Voucher: 179672 23041 6/4/2004 PWS-EQUIPMENT REPAIRS- 23.88 23074 5/4/2004 PWS-EQUIPMENT REPAIRS- 13.06 120,61 179673 6/15/2004 008206 EDWARDS, LEONA F EDWARDS 6/2/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 9.85 9,85 Voucher: 179673 179674 6/15/2004 000343 ELEPHANT CAR WASH 200 4/30/2004 PS-4/04 CAR WASH SERVIC 784.98 784,98 Voucher: 179674 Page: 9 apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179675 6/15/2004 008184 ELliNGER, ELSA STUDENT ART 4/26/2004 PRCS-STUDENT ART SHOW' 100.00 100.00 Voucher: 179675 179676 6/15/2004 007283 EMERALD AIRE INC AG04-43 #3 6/1/2004 AG04-43:HVAC NEW CITY H 16,867.50 16,867.50 Voucher: 179676 179677 6/15/2004 007919 EMPIRE FACILITY SERVICES 112307 5/20/2004 AG04-08:APR04-0FFICE PLN 6,234.59 6,234.59 Voucher: 179677 179678 6/15/2004 006514 ENGINEERING BUSINESS SY 18474 6/1/2004 MSDP-(JUN04) SVC&MNT KI 246.15 246.15 Voucher: 179678 179679 6/15/2004 001673 ENUMCLAW QUARRY INC 29488 5/21/2004 SWM-LAKOTA CREEK BASIN 278.15 278.15 Voucher: 179679 L 179680 6/15/2004 001046 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATI8128340 5/25/2004 PS-CREDIT REPORTS 21.10 21.10 ~ Voucher: 179680 5/31/2004 MSFL T-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 3,183.53 3,183.53 -S:" 179681 6/15/2004 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 0162483 Voucher: 179681 179682 6/15/2004 002227 ETTINGER, ROBERT 3/04-6/2/04 6/3/2004 DBC-3/8/04-6/2/04-MILEAGE F< 125.71 125.71 Voucher: 179682 179683 6/15/2004 004840 EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE 103119 5/4/2004 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 70.72 70.72 Voucher: 179683 179684 6/15/2004 007910 EVERGREEN PIECEMAKERS (C2757R5655 6/7/2004 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.11 150.11 Voucher: 179684 179685 6/15/2004 001748 EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC INC 028577 5/28/2004 AG03-75:MAY04-SWM INFRS 22,428.61 22,428.61 Voucher: 179685 179686 6/15/2004 005972 F & E CHECK PROTECTION S 2632 5/17/2004 MC-1 YR EXTEN OF MECH H 429.77 429.77 Voucher: 179686 179687 6/15/2004 000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR1-828-52803 6/4/2004 MSHR- EXPRESS DELIVERY: 9.89 Voucher: 179687 1- 732-50425 4/19/2004 PWTR-DELIVERY SERVICES 8.24 18.13 179688 6/15/2004 002571 FEDERAL WAY CHORALE MAR27&28,200 5/28/2004 AG04-88:FW CHORALE-COM 1,100.00 1,100.00 Voucher: 179688 Page: 10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179689 6/15/2004 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 005566 5/19/2004 CM- AD SPECIAL "EXPLORE f 1,050.00 Voucher: 179689 005568 5/19/2004 SWM-5/19/04 NEWSP ADS/L 185.92 005592 5/29/2004 CDPL-5/29/04 LEGALS- 166.00 005561 5/15/2004 CDPL-5/15/04 LEGALS- 150.06 005560 5/15/2004 CDPL-5/15/04 LEGALS- 132.80 005539 5/5/2004 CDPL-5/5/04 LEGALS- 126.16 005567 5/19/2004 CDPL-5/19/04 LEGALS- 109.56 50832 5/8/2004 CDPL-5/8/04 LEGALS- 96.94 005538 5/5/2004 CDPL-5/05/04 LEGALS- 79.68 005593 5/29/2004 CDPL-5/29/04 LEGALS- 77,02 2,174.14 179690 6/15/2004 004302 FEDERAL WAY NEWS CITY OF FW-C 5/6/2004 CDA - 1 YR FEDERAL WAY N 26,00 Voucher: 179690 CFW LAW DE 5/7/2004 LAW-1 YR NEWSPAPER SU 26.00 52.00 L 179691 6/15/2004 004690 FEDERAL WAY NUTRITION S 0601FWPD 6/1/2004 PS-5/04 OFFICER LUNCHES [ 317.60 317.60 -C.. Voucher: 179691 \J\ 179692 6/15/2004 001183 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOAR03556 5/25/2004 PKM-UTILITY SVC/CONTRAC 14.48 14.48 Voucher: 179692 179693 6/15/2004 001893 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIS SIF-MAY 2004 6/14/2004 MSF-(MAY04) SCHL IMPACT f 13,701.00 13,701.00 Voucher: 179693 179694 6/15/2004 001593 FEDERAL WAY TOWING INC 21101 6/2/2004 PS-TOWING SERVICES 404.74 Voucher: 179694 20554 5/10/2004 PS-TOWING SERVICES 303.55 708.29 179695 6/15/2004 700483 FEDERAL WAY UNITED SOCCAPRIL 12,200 6/7/2004 CDED-2004 TEG GRANT 2,500.00 2,500.00 Voucher: 179695 179696 6/15/2004 005213 FIFE PRINTING 16111 5/27/2004 MC-PRINTING SERVICES 258.40 258.40 Voucher: 179696 179697 6/15/2004 004910 FILETEX LLC 04-1355 5/5/2004 CDA - LASERPRINT COLORO 123.62 Voucher: 179697 04-1363 5/14/2004 CDA - LASERPRINT COLORO 38.84 04-1353 4/28/2004 CDA - LASERPRINT COLORO 34.53 196,99 179698 6/15/2004 001686 FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MAOO050565 5/31/2004 MSMD-MTH04-SHARP ARM2 37.49 37.49 Voucher: 179698 179699 6/15/2004 008207 FITZPATRICK. MARION LUCIL FITZPATRICK 6/8/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 82.19 82.19 Voucher: 179699 179700 6/15/2004 001299 FORD GRAPHICS 504651 5/19/2004 SWM-PRINTING SERVICES S 311.52 311,52 Voucher: 179700 179701 6/15/2004 006028 FREEBORN LAW OFFICES P 6/1/04 & 6/3 6/4/2004 MC-PRO TEM LEGAL SERVI 125.00 125.00 Voucher: 179701 Page: 11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179702 6/15/2004 002870 FREEWAY TRAILER SALES I 030507 5/12/2004 MSFL T-VEHICLE REPAIRS/S 188.77 Voucher: 179702 031241 6/2/2004 MSFL T-VEHICLE REPAIRS/S 74.20 262.97 179703 6/15/2004 000738 G I JOE'S FEDERAL WAY 104217 5/27/2004 PKM-RAIN WEARIRICHEN 147.13 147.13 Voucher: 179703 179704 6/15/2004 004566 G&M HONEST PERFORMANC 64982 6/3/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 99.14 99.14 Voucher: 179704 179705 6/15/2004 000964 GASB-GOVT ACCTNG STAND 04 ASSESMEN 6/1/2004 MSA-04 ASSESMENT IN SUP 500.00 500.00 Voucher: 179705 179706 6/15/2004 004578 GENE'S TOWING INC 263226 5/24/2004 PS-VEH #662 TOWING SERV 57.12 Voucher: 179706 261585 4/27/2004 PS- VEH #905 TOWING SERV 30.00 87.12 179707 6/15/2004 001478 GEOLINE POSITIONING SYS 165237 4/23/2004 PWTR-MEASURING WHEEL; 47.20 47.20 L. Voucher: 179707 5/18/2004 AG99-143D-APR04-LGL SVCS 1,373.17 1,373.17 -C. 179708 6/15/2004 002574 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C. 217667 Voucher: 179708 ~ 179709 6/15/2004 003831 GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES 04-012 5/31/2004 PS-MAY 04 POLYGRAPH EXA 1,750.00 1,750.00 Voucher: 179709 179710 6/15/2004 008134 GUARDIAN SECURITY AG04- 72 #1 4/30/2004 AG04-72:NEW CH-FIRE ALAR 51,243.55 51,243.55 Voucher: 179710 179711 6/15/2004 008132 GUDMUNDSON CO INC AG04-86 #1 4/30/2004 AG04-86:NEW CH-PAINTING 16,086.19 16,086.19 Voucher: 179711 179712 6/15/2004 000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY 11473039 5/25/2004 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 870.30 Voucher: 179712 11468834 5/18/2004 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 421.82 11472980 5/25/2004 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 235.00 11473000 5/25/2004 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 222.50 1,749.62 179713 6/15/2004 008131 HAM MARS UNIFORM 34692 5/10/2004 PS-BLU II CONCEALABLE BO 4,051.71 Voucher: 179713 34181 4/13/2004 PS-II BLUE CONCEALABLE V 820.40 4,872.11 179714 6/15/2004 007945 HENDERSON, YOUNG & COM427-041 6/3/2004 AG04-37:WRKSHP PARK 1M 2,855.20 2,855,20 Voucher: 179714 179715 6/15/2004 001487 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPA 16245098 5/13/2004 MSDP - SPECIAL RR FOR MU 15,123.20 Voucher: 179715 35941977 5/15/2004 MSDP-NBMC PROLIANT ML 9,546.11 24,669,31 Page: 12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179716 6/15/2004 002477 HOME DEPOT-DEPT 32-250 7029019 5/14/2004 MAY2004-HOME DEPOT SUP 201.34 Voucher: 179716 2210502 4/29/2004 MAY2004-HOME DEPOT SUP 138,14 9030601 5/22/2004 MA Y2004-HOME DEPOT SUP 137,32 1210431 4/20/2004 MA Y2004-HOME DEPOT SUP 92.03 4210720 5/27/2004 MAY2004-HOME DEPOT SUP 44.90 9210592 5/12/2004 MA Y2004-HOME DEPOT SUP 41,06 6200498 5/12/2004 MA Y2004-HOME DEPOT SUP 21,89 3210642 5/18/2004 MA Y2004-HOME DEPOT SUP 10.67 687,35 179717 6/15/2004 008194 HWANG, HESOOK 03-45997 5/24/2004 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 75,00 75,00 Voucher: 179717 179718 6/15/2004 005625 I/O SOLUTIONS LLC C12381A 6/1/2004 MSHR-EXP, POLICE OFFICE 90,00 90,00 Voucher: 179718 179719 6/15/2004 003953 IAAI-WA STATE CHAPTER 208 5/13/2004 PS-04 MARK G BENSEN MBSI 42,50 42,50 Voucher: 179719 C 179720 6/15/2004 008104 ICOM AMERICA INC 4834431 SO 5/20/2004 PS-SP13 EARPHONE FOR H 8.32 8.32 -L Voucher: 179720 -.J 179721 6/15/2004 001431 ICON MATERIALS INC 395871 5/19/2004 PWS-STREET REPAIR MTN - 128.56 128.56 Voucher: 179721 179722 6/15/2004 005691 INLAND PACIFIC STAMPS & 482909 4/12/2004 CDP-OFFICE SUPPLIES 33.24 33,24 Voucher: 179722 179723 6/15/2004 005231 10S CAPITAL INC 62421622 5/28/2004 MSMD-COPIER RENTAL 1,470,92 1,470,92 Voucher: 179723 179724 6/15/2004 003211 IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE I M698180 5/31/2004 MSC-5/04 RECORDS STORAC 839.25 839,25 Voucher: 179724 179725 6/15/2004 005025 J&R COMMERCIAL JNTR SVC 2138 5/18/2004 AGOO-51C:(MAY04)CHB JNTR 1,797.00 Voucher: 179725 2140 5/18/2004 AG03-22:(MAY04)MNT OFF J 375.00 2137 5/18/2004 AG03-22:(MA Y04 )STEEL LK J 333.33 2139 5/18/2004 NEW CH-MAY04-JANITORIAL 255.00 2,760.33 179726 6/15/2004 005272 JAMS COSTUMES/DBA DANS<413-006 6/7/2004 PRCS-DANCE COSTUMES-SF 1,715.47 Voucher: 179726 421-042 6/1/2004 PRCS - SHELLY LEBEL'S DA 531.59 428-047 6/1/2004 PRCS - SHELLY LEBEL'S DA 95.47 2,342.53 179727 6/15/2004 001563 JDK SMALL ENGINE REPAIR 1587093 6/1/2004 SWM-EDGER REPAIR; EQUI 81.60 81.60 Voucher: 179727 179728 6/15/2004 005444 JENSEN, KRIS ROBERT 5/26/04 5/26/2004 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE 400.00 Voucher: 179728 6/3/04 6/3/2004 MC-PRO TEM LEGAL SERVI 175.00 575,00 Page: 13 apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 14 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid 179729 6/15/2004 007157 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATI0019327 5/11/2004 AG03-190:CITY CTR PLANNE 3,291.00 Voucher: 179729 0019326 5/11/2004 AG03-190:CITY CTR PLANNE 700.80 179730 6/15/2004 005934 K P TRANSLATION SERVICE 5/11/04-5/12 5/11/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 274.00 Voucher: 179730 5/25-5/26/04 5/31/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 274.00 4/13/04 4/13/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 159.50 4/20/04 4/20/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 159.50 4/27/04 4/27/2004 MC.:lNTERPRETER SVC 159.50 5/4/04 5/4/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 159.50 4/7/04 4/7/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 114.52 179731 6/15/2004 002679 KANG, SAI C OS/24/04 5/24/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 35.00 Voucher: 179731 179732 6/15/2004 007370 KATHLEEN P DECKER MD 5/19/04 5/19/2004 PS-FIT FOR DUTY STEMPLE 175.00 C Voucher: 179732 5/25/2004 PWSWR-RECYCLING PROG. 305.39 -.c.. 179733 6/15/2004 003309 KCDA PURCHASING COOPER62042601 .~ Voucher: 179733 62041701 5/25/2004 PWSWR-RECYCLING PROG. 288.99 C 179734 6/15/2004 008173 KIKAHA 0 KE KAI OUTRIGGE APRIL 12,200 6/4/2004 CDED - 2004 TEG GRANT 1,000.00 Voucher: 179734 179735 6/15/2004 005956 KING COUNTY AUDITOR CITY OF AUBU 5/24/2004 PS-RCRD FEES-CUSTODY 0 34.00 Voucher: 179735 KC RECD FEE 5/27/2004 PS-RECORDING FEES - PRO 25.00 179736 6/15/2004 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIV 1302645 5/18/2004 PWTR-(APR04)BSC SIGN/MR 31,606.86 Voucher: 179736 1303097 5/21/2004 AG03-161 :(JUN04)-I-NET SVC 800.00 1304966 6/4/2004 PWST-MAY04-BOW LAKE T 607.52 179737 6/15/2004 005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DI202365 6/2/2004 PWT -5/04 MA TERIALS/SUPPL 386.58 Voucher: 179737 Check Total 3,991.80 1,300.52 35.00 175.00 594.38 1,000.00 59.00 33,014,38 386.58 Page: 14 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 15 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179738 6/15/2004 003898 KING COUNTY RADIO 303645 5/31/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 4,809.30 Voucher: 179738 42674 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 396.60 42707 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 336.64 42758 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 311.70 42662 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 255.46 42554 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 177.34 42663 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIOSERVICES 177,34 42665 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 177.34 42668 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 177.34 42671 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 177.34 42672 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 100,93 42717 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 90,75 43056 5/28/2004 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 74.70 7,262.78 L.. 179739 6/15/2004 000376 KING COUNTY WATER & LAN 2004-1 5/3/2004 AG90-23D:1/1-6/30 SWM UTI 14,903.46 14,903.46 -C Voucher: 179739 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- -.0 179740 6/15/2004 000201 KINKO'S lNG, ACCOUNT #020 5151000726866/2/2004 198.45 Voucher: 179740 515100072635 5/27/2004 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 160,92 515100072574 5/20/2004 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- 107.85 515100072723 6/7/2004 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- 106.62 515100072592 5/21/2004 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 95.47 05630045590 5/28/2004 PS-PHOTO G WILSON FBI A 14,09 683.40 179741 6/15/2004 000201 KINKO'S lNG, ACCOUNT #020 515100072541 5/17/2004 CDP - CFC CITY COUNCIL P 118,10 Voucher: 179741 515100072614 5/24/2004 CDP - CFC STAFF REPORT C 8.7.04 515100072556 5/18/2004 CDP COPIES OF PAA NOTIC 83.23 515100072540 5/17/2004 CDP - CFC CITY COUNCIL P 33.86 515100072510 5/13/2004 CDP - CFC CITY COUNCIL P 32.86 355.09 179742 6/15/2004 003399 KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY MAY 04 5/25/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 570.00 570.00 Voucher: 179742 Page: 15 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 16 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179743 6/15/2004 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI 80406 5/11/2004 PKKLC 3/04 WATER/SEWER ~ 219.00 Voucher: 179743 2961501 5/19/2004 PWS-4/14/04 WATER SVCS- 102.98 1014202 5/27/2004 PKM-UTILITY CHARGES 90.78 2922203 5/11/2004 PARAGON BLDG-3/04 WATE 19.78 2890801 5/11/2004 PKKLC 3/04 WATER/SEWER ~ 19.78 2883701 5/11/2004 PKKLC 3/04 WATER/SEWER ~ 14.48 2798301 5/14/2004 PKM-UTILITY CHARGES 14.48 2830801 5/14/2004 PKM-UTILITY CHARGES 14.48 2781401 5/19/2004 PKM-UTILITY CHARGES 14.48 3059601 5/24/2004 PKM-UTILITY CHARGES 14.48 L 2592802 5/27/2004 PKM-UTILITY CHARGES 14.48 2781501 5/27/2004 PKM-UTILITY CHARGES 14.48 \Jì 2906301 5/27/2004 PKM-UTILITY CHARGES 14.48 568.16 ð 179744 6/15/2004 007545 LANE POWELL SPEARS LUB 3285684 5/5/2004 AG03-142:PSA CONTRUCTIO 137.50 137.50 Voucher: 179744 179745 6/15/2004 004052 LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP 03150408 3/15/2004 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 3,195.13 Voucher: 179745 05210403 5/7/2004 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 97.48 01210410 1/21/2004 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 32,15 3,324.76 179746 6/15/2004 005076 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGE 0048859-IN 6/3/2004 PS-POLICE TARGET SUPPLIE 282.40 282.40 Voucher: 179746 179747 6/15/2004 005510 LAW OFFICE OF DAVID RUZU617 5/20/2004 LAW-CNFL T PBLC DFNS-FE 450.00 450.00 Voucher: 179747 179748 6/15/2004 005668 LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND MAY 2004 5/27/2004 AGO1-62B:PUBLIC DEFENSE: 1,350.00 1,350.00 Voucher: 179748 179749 6/15/2004 005478 LEBEL, SHELLEY MILEAGE REIM 6/1/2004 MILEAGE REIMB--VICTORIAI 105.00 Voucher: 179749 VOL DINN REI 6/8/2004 CD/HS-VOL DINN GIFT ITEM 29.44 134.44 179750 6/15/2004 008195 LEE, JOSEPH 03-46049 6/2/2004 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 75.00 75.00 Voucher: 179750 179751 6/15/2004 003157 LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF '262797 5/7/2004 MSFL T-TIRES 2,569.70 Voucher: 179751 262995 5/11/2004 MSFL T-TIRE REPAIR 112,76 263050 5/11/2004 MSFL T-TIRE REPAIR 28.83 264050 5/28/2004 MSFL T-TIRE REPAIR 16,83 263003 5/11/2004 MSFL T-TIRE REPAIR 13.94 262956 5/10/2004 MSFL T-TIRE REPAIR 12.24 2,754.30 Page: 16 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 17 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179752 6/15/2004 004594 LlM, VANNARA S 6/1/04 6/1/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 100.00 100,00 Voucher: 179752 179753 6/15/2004 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC 71635 5/24/2004 PKCP-PLAYFIELD SAND- 727.86 Voucher: 179753 71521 5/18/2004 PKCP-PLA YFIELD SAND- 146.34 71634 5/24/2004 PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL 49.81 924,01 179754 6/15/2004 008208 LLOYD, CHARLOTTE LOUISE LLOYD 6/2/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 20.12 20,12 Voucher: 179754 179755 6/15/2004 007638 LORD, JULIE G EMPLOY REIM 5/24/2004 PRCS-SR SAMPLER AT KLC 176.07 176,07 Voucher: 179755 179756 6/15/2004 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC 913248 5/21/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 234.69 Voucher: 179756 913053 5/25/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 188.67 C C876608 4/27/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 140.66 ",\ C076727 4/29/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 140.34 ~ 913106 5/19/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 120.42 931706 5/26/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 112.46 931912 5/27/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 109.63 909733 5/24/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 104.33 C176788 4/30/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 86.93 C576973 5/4/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 76.09 911731 5/25/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 47.56 913309 5/20/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 46.53 C476928 5/3/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 33.88 913269 5/27/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 31.80 C377407 5/12/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 29.35 C876614 4/27/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 27,95 C477468 5/13/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 22.85 C277355 5/11/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 17.38 913799 5/17/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 11,03 931669 5/26/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 7,97 913287 5/27/2004 MAY 2004-LOWE'S SUPPLIE 1.31 1,591.83 179757 6/15/2004 008189 LUTHERAN STAFF ASSOCIA C2569R5654 6/7/2004 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 1,106.06 1,106,06 Voucher: 179757 179758 6/15/2004 005043 MACHINERY POWER & EQU S1128201 5/28/2004 -MSFL T -PW ASPHALT ROLLE 30,436.15 30,436.15 Voucher: 179758 Page: 17 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 18 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179759 6/15/2004 001004 MAILMEDIA DBA IMMEDIA 42877 5/14/2004 PRCS-FINAL SUMMER 04 RE 1,074.13 1,074.13 Voucher: 179759 179760 6/15/2004 008209 MARSHALL, MAVIS L MARSHALL 5/28/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 69,32 69.32 Voucher: 179760 179761 6/15/2004 700894 MARTIN, DAVE 164438 5/26/2004 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D 500.00 500.00 Voucher: 179761 179762 6/15/2004 000960 MATTHEW BENDER & COMP 83887660 5/5/2004 MC-LAW RESOURCE PUBLI 21.41 21.41 Voucher: 179762 179763 6/15/2004 004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS INC 133653 3/31/2004 PWSWR-CLEAN UP BI-AN 301.92 Voucher: 179763 134326 5/15/2004 PKMT/SWEEPING SERVICE 51.27 353.19 179764 6/15/2004 008142 MCGAVICK GRAVES P S 7037518 5/6/2004 CM-SOUND TRANSIT LEGAL 30.00 30.00 L Voucher: 179764 '.J', 179765 6/15/2004 005176 MERINO, BETTY 5/25/04 5/25/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 202.50 ¡J Voucher: 179765 6/1/04 6/1/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 112.50 5/27/04 5/27/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 45.00 360.00 179766 6/15/2004 007804 MICROFIBER CLEANING PRO 1087 4/7/2004 PRCS-FLAT MAP HANDLE 10.83 10.83 Voucher: 179766 179767 6/15/2004 001793 MICROFLEX INC 00014999 6/1/2004 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM - 40.94 40.94 Voucher: 179767 179768 6/15/2004 003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTE 39215 5/25/2004 PKM-6/04 ALARM MONITORI" 34.82 34.82 Voucher: 179768 179769 6/15/2004 003892 MONTGOMERY WATER GRO 2004-64 4/30/2004 AG03-58A:(APR04) E LAKOT 4,569.73 4,569.73 Voucher: 179769 179770 6/15/2004 008185 MOON, IRENE MOON 4/14/2004 PRCS-STUDENT ART SHOW 100.00 100,00 Voucher: 179770 179771 6/15/2004 000955 MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPA AB444340S 5/18/2004 PKMT-CONCRETE MATERIA 584,78 584,78 Voucher: 179771 179772 6/15/2004 001902 MYERS MASTER LAWN CAR 729 5/30/2004 PKMT-MAY04-LANDSCAPE S 3,109.50 Voucher: 179772 727 5/30/2004 CITYHALL-MA Y04-LANDSCP ~ 437.43 3,546.93 179773 6/15/2004 001052 NAPA AUTO PARTS 756905 5/7/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 42.69 Voucher: 179773 756827 5/7/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 34.81 759042 5/20/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 5.43 82.93 17977 4 6/15/2004 003868 NATIONAL BARRICADE COMF82479 5/24/2004 PWS-ARROW TRAFFIC CON 272.00 272.00 Voucher: 179774 Page: 18 apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 19 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 179778 6/15/2004 008176 NELSON, JAMES Voucher: 179778 L \j\ '-.N Inv Date Description 5/26/2004 PS-REPAIRIMAINTENANCE 0 0132123-IN 4/28/2004 PKM-SAFETY SUPPLIES 25974 6/10/2004 25974-WILKIN 6/10/2004 25974-JOHNSO 6/10/2004 25974-SELLEG 6/10/2004 25974-DUNLAP 6/10/2004 25974-HIRMAN 6/10/2004 25974-ARBUTH 6/10/2004 NELSON, J 6/8/2004 PS-NTOA TRNG SVCS-K SUM PS-NTOA TRNG SVCS-T WIL PS-NTOA TRNG SVCS-JOHN PS-NTOA TRNG SVCS-SELL PS-NTOA TRNG SVCS-DUNL PS-NTOA TRNG SVCS-HIRM PS-NTOA TRNG SVCS-ARBU PS-APPL BCKGD-NELSON-PE Amount Paid 316.53 333.47 586.00 586.00 586,00 586,00 586.00 586,00 586.00 68.00 Check Total 316.53 333.47 4,102.00 68.00 Check # Date Vendor Invoice 179775 6/15/2004 008143 NATIONAL MICROSCOPE EX 20045 Vouche~ 179775 . 179776 6/15/2004 004445 NATIONAL SAFETY INC Voucher: 179776 179777 6/15/2004 005561 NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFIC Voucher: 179777 Page: 19 apChkLst 06/1512004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 20 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179780 6/15/2004 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE 170192 5/19/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 195.83 Voucher: 179780 170309 5/21/2004 SWMCIP-REPAIR/MNTNNC S 167.90 170603 5/28/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 108.28 169972 5/13/2004 SWM-REPAIR/MAINTENANC 84.31 169747 5/10/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 79.38 170408 5/24/2004 PKM-SU PPLI ES/REP AI RS 75.17 169492 5/4/2004 PKM-REPAIRlSUPPLIES 45.62 169215 4/28/2004 PKM-REPAIRlSUPPLIES 45.32 170225 5/19/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 44.66 170189 5/19/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 41.95 169357 4/30/2004 PKM-REPAIRlSUPPLIES 41.38 170505 5/26/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 35.76 C 169517 5/4/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 33.08 169615 5/6/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 30.21 \5\ 169774 5/10/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 27.36 ---Ç.. 169593 5/6/2004 PKM.SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 20.89 170659 6/1/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 18.51 170026 5/15/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 18.26 169243 4/28/2004 PKM-REPAIRlSUPPLIES 16.82 169668 5/7/2004 SWM-REPAIRIMAINTENANC 14.45 107411 5/24/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 14.32 169459 5/3/2004 PKM-REPAIRlSUPPLIES 14.11 169932 5/13/2004 KJP- SUPPLIES 13.93 170456 5/25/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 12.88 169767 5/10/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 10.83 169693 5/8/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 10.49 169843 5/11/2004 PKM-REPAIRlSUPPLIES 10.37 170514 5/26/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 9.77 170074 5/17/2004 PWSR-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLI 9.02 170508 5/26/2004 KJP- SUPPLIES 8.79 170084 5/17/2004 SWM-REPAIRIMAINTENANC 7.03 169661 5/7/2004 PKRLS-REPAIR SUPPLIES 5.62 170104 5/17/2004 PKM-SUPPLIES/REPAIRS 5.44 169426 5/3/2004 SWM-REPAIRIMAINTENANC 5.29 169198 4/27/2004 SWM-REPAIRIMAINTENANC 4.89 Page: 20 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 21 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 169361 4/30/2004 PWST-MAINT TOOLISUPPLI 3.99 169183 4/27/2004 PKM-REPAIRISUPPLIES 3,87 169488 5/4/2004 PWTR-MAINT TOOLISUPPLI 3.80 1,299.58 179781 6/15/2004 000089 NEWS TRIBUNE 220280 5/30/2004 MSHR-JOB AD 5/3/04-5/3 1,310,04 1,310.04 Voucher: 179781 179782 6/15/2004 004701 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 400102318 5/29/2004 MSTEL-CELLULAR AIRTIME 2,976.36 2,976.36 Voucher: 179782 179783 6/15/2004 007419 NORTH CENTRAL ESD C2557R5651 6/7/2004 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 150,00 Voucher: 179783 179784 6/15/2004 001391 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC C 089630700 5/25/2004 PKM-INV#089630700/DRILL P 189,96 Voucher: 179784 089629700 5/25/2004 PKM-INV#089639700/BRACK 19,67 209,63 179785 6/15/2004 700190 NORTHWEST CHURCH VOL DIN 6/4/ 6/4/2004 CD/HS VOL DINNER FACIL R 300,00 300,00 L.. Voucher: 179785 \J\ 179786 6/15/2004 000708 NRPA-NAT'L REC & PARK AS 20014567 2/11/2004 PRCS-NRPA CLASS FOR BR 515,00 515,00 V'\ Voucher: 179786 179787 6/15/2004 007818 O'DONNELL, KELLI EMPLOY REIM 5/26/2004 CDHS-20 3 RING BINDERS 0 132.15 132.15 Voucher: 179787 179788 6/15/2004 008210 ONISHCHENKO, L YUDMILA ONISHCHENK 5/27/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 28.57 28.57 Voucher: 179788 179789 6/15/2004 007444 ORCA PACIFIC INC 010681 5/14/2004 AG03-154A:SWIMMING POO 144.86 Voucher: 179789 011019 5/31/2004 AG03-154A:SWIMMING POO 118.87 263.73 179790 6/15/2004 000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 18457 5/10/2004 PKM-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPLI 75,86 Voucher: 179790 307852 5/24/2004 PWST -MAINTENANCE/REPAI 54,70 308407 6/4/2004 PW ST -MAl NTENANCE/REP AI 16.60 147.16 179791 6/15/2004 000034 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAf\580456259-01 5/12/2004 PKRCS-RECREATION PROG 654.45 654.45 Voucher: 179791 179792 6/15/2004 005741 OUTCOMES BY LEVY MAY 2004 5/31/2004 AG03-191 :(MAY04)LOBBYIST 3,927.98 3,927,98 Voucher: 179792 179793 6/15/2004 000112 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC FOCS105195 6/3/2004 MSFL T-REPAIRIMAINT SVCS 593,69 Voucher: 179793 FOCS105247 6/4/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 468.01 272520 5/26/2004 MSFL T-REPAIRIMAINT SVCS 21.76 271049 3/26/2004 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN 16.82 1 ,100.28 179794 6/15/2004 004004 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC MAY 2004 5/1/2004 SUI-(MAY04) VEH LEASE-200 277.41 277.41 Voucher: 179794 Page: 21 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 22 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179795 6/15/2004 000315 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE 1565895 5/24/2004 PWST-TITLE REPORTS 359.04 Voucher: 179795 565894 5/20/2004 PWST-TITLE REPORTS 359.04 . 718.08 179796 6/15/2004 002379 PACIFIC TOPSOILS INC 66619 5/26/2004 PWS-SANDY LOAM/DRY SO 182.94 Voucher: 179796 66602 5/26/2004 PWS-SANDY LOAM/DRY SO 94.16 66592 5/26/2004 PWS-SANDY LOAM/DRY SO 94.16 371.26 179797 6/15/2004 006440 PAPE MACINERY INC 2304136 5/12/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT. SER 1,451.49 Voucher: 179797 2304116 5/12/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT. SER 986.61 2304117 5/12/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT. SER 820.09 2304119 5/12/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT. SER 627.26 270963 5/28/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT. SER 58.23 C- 270991 5/28/2004 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT. SER 7.43 3,951.11 179798 6/15/2004 005293 PEOPLE'S TRANSLATION SE 3/17/04-5/12 5/20/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 518.50 \.J) Voucher: 179798 5/11/04-5/25 6/1/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 462.60 981.10 ~ 179799 6/15/2004 003386 PEREZ, RICK 253616 5/4/2004 PWTR-TRJP GENERATION 7 291.20 291.20 Voucher: 179799 179800 6/15/2004 001794 PETE'S TOWING SERVICE 286586 5/28/2004 MSFLT-TOWING SVC 220.32 220.32 Voucher: 179800 179801 6/15/2004 001166 PETTY CASH - KLAHANEE 2004 RWBF 6/9/2004 PRCS-2004 RWBF CHANGE F 750.00 750.00 Voucher: 179801 179802 6/15/2004 007470 PETTY CASH - MGMT. SVC, MA Y2004 6/8/2004 MSFL T-FILING & RECD'G NE 216.69 216.69 Voucher: 179802 179803 6/15/2004 008182 PETTY CASH-KLAHANEE CC 2004 RWBF 6/9/2004 PRCS-2004 RWBF CHANGE F 750.00 750.00 Voucher: 179803 179804 6/15/2004 006241 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT PS 6/1/04 6/1/2004 PS-MILEAGE REIMB:TRAINI 257.86 257.86 Voucher: 179804 179805 6/15/2004 007059 PHELPSTIRE CO 756912 5/24/2004 MSFL T-TIRES REPAIRS 110.98 110,98 Voucher: 179805 179806 6/15/2004 003520 PHUNG, NOVA C 5/25/04 5/25/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 75,00 75.00 Voucher: 179806 179807 6/15/2004 000808 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 5761319 5/28/2004 PKLCC-LlGHTING SUPPLIES 36.72 36,72 Voucher: 179807 179808 6/15/2004 008188 PLAYFUL PAWS INC 04-101909-00 5/17/2004 CDB-RFND BLDG PRMT FEE: 15,85 15,85 Voucher: 179808 179809 6/15/2004 001174 PNBOA-PACIFIC NW BASKET 11963 5/16/2004 AG02-110:2004 BASKETBALL 4,000.00 4,000,00 Voucher: 179809 Page: 22 apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 23 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 17855 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 4/30/2004 CITY MAIL PROCESSING/COl 5,971,57 5,971.57 6/2/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 100.49 100.49 5/20/2004 PKM-WELDING GAS 8,70 8.70 5/21/2004 AGOO-107D:JET CHV-SIGN C 6,671.20 6,671,20 4/30/2004 PKNCH-INSTALL UV FIL TRA 410.20 41 0.20 5/25/2004 PRCS-ENVELOPES REG & W 205.31 6/1/2004 PS-BUSINESS REPLY ENVEL 69.63 274,94 5/20/2004 MSDP/NB/GAC- PAN/TIL T SY 24,308,09 5/28/2004 MSDP/NB/GAC- PAN/TIL T SY 14,738,04 5/28/2004 MSDP/NB/GAC-LENS CONVE 592.96 39,639.09 Check # Date Vendor Invoice 179810 6/15/2004 001411 POSTAL EXPRESS INC Voucher: 179810 179811 6/15/2004 008211 POSTE, EDNA BEATRICE Voucher: 179811 179812 6/15/2004 005583 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 522170 Voucher: 179812 179813 6/15/2004 000049 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LL 621514 Voucher: 179813 179814 6/15/2004 008101 PRICE KING MARKET INC Voucher: 179814 179815 6/15/2004 008107 PRINT SOLUTIONS & CONSUL 118 Voucher: 179815 126 C 179816 6/15/2004 004439 PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & TA W27235 '-..~ Voucher: 179816 W2730 1 ~ W27299 BM2404003 POSTE Page: 23 apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 24 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 179817 6/15/2004 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 156-140-2114 Voucher: 179817 353-789-9647 . 803-299-9735 519-842-1009 345-200-2003 376-488-6325 727 -469-1000 411-836-4779 398-842-1008 398-842-1008 311-112-7001 128-255-2015 345-200-2003 319-041-1003 888-389-1007 483-657 -3297 993-440-2000 625-940-2003 190-977 -0008 652-017-1007 753-129-1008 411-826-9315 996-289-0001 017 -470-0088 128-255-9812 472-400-1005 736-169-1004 156-140-8749 786-203-1007 889-288-1007 156-140-4276 250-275-4910 121-220-2004 221-220-2002 002-141-1004 C \..1\ cc: Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 5/19/2004 PKM-ELECTRICTY CHARGE 7,941.51 5/19/2004 KJP-ELECTRICITY/GAS 4,975.41 5/17/2004 PKM-ELECTRICTY CHARGE 3,472.71 5/17/2004 PKM-ELECTRICTY CHARGE 3,009.97 5/14/2004 PKM-ELECTRICTY CHARGE 2,949.78 5/17/2004 PS-ELECTRICITY CHGS 2,552.79 5/18/2004 PKDBC/KFT -ELECTRCTY CH 1,628.03 5/19/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 1,233.19 4/16/2004 PKRCS-ELECTRICITY CHGS 1,193.74 5/17/2004 PKRCS-ELECTRICITY CHGS 960.88 5/18/2004 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRICITY C 949.04 5/18/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 465.03 5/20/2004 PKM-ELECTRICTY CHARGE 428.30 5/19/2004 PKM-ELECTRICTY CHARGE 398.92 5/17/2004 MC-4/16-5/16/04 ELECTRIC IT 289,61 5/18/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 276.38 . 5/18/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 165.40 5/19/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 154.01 5/18/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 149,81 5/19/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 121 .70 5/18/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 118.19 5/19/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 116.34 5/19/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 115.82 5/19/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 112.07 5/18/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 93.90 5/19/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 72.79 5/18/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 56.16 5/13/2004 PKM-ELECTRICTY CHARGE 41.24 5/19/2004 . PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 40.09 5/19/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 34.49 5/17/2004 PKM-ELECTRICTY CHARGE 30.79 5/18/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 14.45 5/19/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 6.55 5/19/2004 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHARG 5.84 5/18/2004 PKM-ELECTRICTY CHARGE 5.84 Page: 24 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 25 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 699-699-1003 5/18/2004 PWS- ELECTRICITY CHRGS 5.84 34,186.61 179818 6/15/2004 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 246-499-870- 3/5/2004 RISK-PSE CLAIM#04-30-277 328.22 328.22 Voucher: 179818 179819 6/15/2004 008190 PUYALLUP TRIBAL HEALTH AC2714R5650 6/7/2004 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 150,00 Voucher: 179819 179820 6/15/2004 000073 QUADRANT SYSTEMS INC 040524-27 6/1/2004 MSDP/FI-CASH RECEIPTING I 880.00 880,00 Voucher: 179820 179821 6/15/2004 004043 QUALITY FENCE BUILDERS I 14305 5/10/2004 MSRM-REPAIR RETENTION F 1,049.92 1,049,92 Voucher: 179821 179822 6/15/2004 003824 QUINLAN PUBLISHING COMP,15321314 5/15/2004 PS-DISCIPLINARY BULLETIN 87.88 87.88 Voucher: 179822 179823 6/15/2004 000202 QWEST 206- T02-867 4 5/16/2004 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 538.46 C. Voucher: 179823 253-946-9943 5/16/2004 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 61.80 ~ 253-661-9833 5/16/2004 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 61.80 ~ 253-942- 7800 5/25/2004 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 29.77 691.83 179824 6/15/2004 005922 QWEST DEX 020460964000 5/22/2004 PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD 388.96 388.96 Voucher: 179824 179825 6/15/2004 008174 RAIDER PARENT MOVEMENT APRIL 12,200 6/7/2004 CDED- 2004 TEG GRANT 2,500,00 2,500.00 Voucher: 179825 179826 6/15/2004 006239 RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURINC188463 5/5/2004 PS-K-9 CROWN VIC DOOR/W 279.95 Voucher: 179826 187679-2 5/6/2004 PS-K-9 OFFICERS MANUAL/E 32.95 312.90 179827 6/15/2004 006873 REGENCY CLEANERS MAY 2004 5/31/2004 AG02-98:(MAY04)PS DRY CL 3,245.63 3,245.63 Voucher: 179827 179828 6/15/2004 002120 RESTAURANT APPLIANCE S 1029305-IN 3/31/2004 PRCS-VRCC KITCHEN STOV 580.31 580.31 Voucher: 179828 179829 6/15/2004 005033 RITTER VEGETATION SERVI 146 5/10/2004 PKM-NOXIOIUS WEED SPRA 4,281.80 4,281.80 Voucher: 179829 179830 6/15/2004 004317 RITZ CAMERA ONE HOUR PH 1026085970 5/25/2004 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 8.00 Voucher: 179830 1026085120 5/24/2004 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 6.08 14.08 179831 6/15/2004 003469 ROAD WARRIORS INC 50214 5/28/2004 PWS- TRAFFIC CONTROLS 260.00 260.00 Voucher: 179831 179832 6/15/2004 008196 ROSALES-CONTRERAS, JOS 03-46062 6/2/2004 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 75,00 75,00 Voucher: 179832 179833 6/15/2004 006657 S C I INFRASTRUCTURE LLC AG02-58 #1 5/17/2004 AG02-58C:PAC HWY S HOV L 9,425,06 9,425.06 Voucher: 179833 Page: 25 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 26 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179834 6/15/2004 000518 SAFETY & SUPPLY COMPAN 885095-1 5/17/2004 SWM-OFFICE CHAIR FOR D. 598.40 598.40 Voucher: 179834 179835 6/15/2004 008106 SANDERS GENERAL CaNST AG04-58 #2 6/11/2004 AG04-58:WEYERHAEUSER & 148,198.20 148,198.20 Voucher: 179835 179836 6/15/2004 008072 SA TO SERVICE LLC FW-2 5/1/2004 AG04-34:CH 2% PBLC ARTWF 10,000.00 10,000.00 Voucher: 179836 179837 6/15/2004 003426 SCHENKEL, KEITH 50101100 5/16/2004 PS-LUGGAGE OVERWEIGHT 50.00 50.00 Voucher: 179837 179838 6/15/2004 008152 SEARCH SYSTEMS INC 001100 5/11/2004 PS-EQUIP SC2-BAT50 SRT E 326.00 326.00 Voucher: 179838 L 179839 6/15/2004 000106 SELECT TRAVEL INC 405271020 5/27/2004 PS-AIRFARE:J NELSON 6/7/ 493.90 493,90 Voucher: 179839 ~ 179840 6/15/2004 005539 SEMISI-TUPOU, VAIVAO 5/25/04 5/25/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 113.25 C Voucher: 179840 5/13/04 4/13/2004 MC-INTERPRETER SVC 70.00 183.25 179841 6/15/2004 005340 SENIOR SERVICES OF SEAT 5/04 5/4/2004 PRCS-MAY 2004 SR MEAL P 230.00 230,00 Voucher: 179841 179842 6/15/2004 001988 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY 414/1396 4/14/2004 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES AC 28.16 Voucher: 179842 421/8547 4/21/2004 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES AC 19.03 505/4463 5/5/2004 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES AC 19.03 428/6566 4/28/2004 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES AC 19.03 407/3410 4/7/2004 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES AC 19.03 519/1129 5/19/2004 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES AC 19.03 512/2998 5/12/2004 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES AC 19.03 526/8024 5/26/2004 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES AC 19.03 161 ,37 179843 6/15/2004 008172 SFC ASSOCIATES 6/29/04 REUT 6/7/2004 PKM-SPORTS FIELD CONSTF 125.00 125.00 Voucher: 179843 179844 6/15/2004 005313 SHRED-IT WESTERN WASHI1\10712056 6/2/2004 PS-SHREDDING SERVICES ( 231.00 231.00 Voucher: 179844 179845 6/15/2004 008183 SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP 041-19823 5/20/2004 PRCS-RPLSCREW IN MANUJ 250.24 250.24 Voucher: 179845 179846 6/15/2004 000056 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI31781 5/27/2004 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 418.91 418.91 Voucher: 179846 179847 6/15/2004 007991 SMS CLEANING 1127 5/24/2004 AG04-19:(MAY04) KLCC JNT 780.00 780.00 Voucher: 179847 Page: 26 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 27 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179848 6/15/2004 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC 015883 5/26/2004 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 388.00 Voucher: 179848 015712 5/1/2004 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 141.60 015792 5/15/2004 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 141.60 671,20 179849 6/15/2004 000723 SOUND RESOURCE MGMT G FWA-013 5/26/2004 AGOO-154B:SOL WST/RECY C 3,297.47 3,297.47 Voucher: 179849 179850 6/15/2004 001885 SPARKS CAR CARE 13417 5/28/2004 MSFTL-AG03-157 VHCS MNT 313.07 Voucher: 179850 13298 5/10/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 45.09 13321 5/13/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 44.23 13317 5/12/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 41.14 13318 5/12/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 39.37 13314 5/12/2004 PS-AG03-157:VEHICLES MNT 33.21 13418 5/28/2004 MSFTL-AG03-157 VHCS MNT 29.75 545.86 179851 6/15/2004 006747 SPECIALIZED ARMAMENT WF9894 5/24/2004 PS-CURRENT FACTORY SPE 407.75 407.75 L Voucher: 179851 ~ 179852 6/15/2004 002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL 264487 5/3/2004 PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC 92.48 -. Voucher: 179852 264546 5/2/2004 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC 92.48 264659 5/3/2004 PKM-ST LK PEST CONTROL ~ 89.22 264547 5/3/2004 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC 52.22 326.40 179853 6/15/2004 006151 SPRINT SPECTRUM 0129395367 - 7 5/15/2004 PS-4/15/04-5/14/04 WIRELES 968.91 968.91 Voucher: 179853 179854 6/15/2004 702237 ST JAMES EPISCOPAL PARIS C2747R5653 6/7/2004 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 106.48 106.48 Voucher: 179854 179855 6/15/2004 006603 ST PHILOMENA SCHOOL C2891 R5652 6/7/2004 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 150.00 Voucher: 179855 179856 6/15/2004 005651 STANKATIS, GREG MILEAGE REIM 5/23/2004 PS-SWAT BASIC SCHOOL M 222.62 222.62 Voucher: 179856 179857 6/15/2004 003307 STERICYCLE INC 0002799306 5/17/2004 PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 153.81 153.81 Voucher: 179857 179858 6/15/2004 005921 STL SEATTLE 58018498 5/27/2004 SWM-OIL AND GREASE TE 120.00 120.00 Voucher: 179858 179859 6/15/2004 004926 STRIPE RITE INC 7334 5/31/2004 AG03-141 :2003 P A VEM ENT M 6,392.37 6,392.37 Voucher: 179859 179860 6/15/2004 000308 SUBURBAN CITIES ASSOCIA 884 5/20/2004 CC-SCA MEMSHIP MTG CC & 150.00 150.00 Voucher: 179860 Page: 27 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 28 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total. 179861 6/15/2004 005910 SUMNER TRACTOR & EQUI 01 300866 4/19/2004 MSFL T- FLEET REPAIR 264.38 264,38 Voucher: 179861 179862 6/15/2004 008212 SUNDBERG, LAURA SUNDBERG 5/28/2004 UTILITY TAX REBATE PROGF 35.84 35.84 Voucher: 179862 179863 6/15/2004 007710 SUPERIOR LINEN SERVICE 240573 4/6/2004 PRCS-FLOOR MAT RENTAL ~ 45.73 Voucher: 179863 244554 4/20/2004 PRCS-FLOOR MAT RENTAL ~ 45.05 248538 5/4/2004 PRCS-FLOOR MAT RENTAL ~ 45.05 252530 5/18/2004 PRCS-FLOOR MAT RENTAL ~ 45.05 180.88 179864 6/15/2004 000588 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 100048250 5/25/2004 PKDBC/KFT-PUBLIC UTILIT 342.00 Voucher: 179864 100255396 4/30/2004 PKF--WATER PALISADES 216.16 558.16 C. 179865 6/15/2004 002176 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCT 10100191 5/19/2004 PKM-STEEL CUTTING SCREV 91.81 Voucher: 179865 15772410 5/17/2004 PKM-STEEL CUTTING SCREV 34.42 126.23 ~ 179866 6/15/2004 000873 TARGET STORES DIVISION, f\ 11 03750423 2/19/2004 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 65.27 Voucher: 179866 1103831819 5/7/2004 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 8.68 73.95 179867 6/15/2004 006146 TASER INTERNATIONAL 00938227 5/11/2004 PS-TASERS MODEL X26- 12,404.50 12,404.50 Voucher: 179867 179868 6/15/2004 008197 TEAL, JANET 03-46063 6/2/2004 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 75.00 75.00 Voucher: 179868 179869 6/15/2004 006033 THE FAB SHOP LLC Z-2303 6/1/2004 MSFL T - REPAIRS SVC 70.73 70.73 Voucher: 179869 179870 6/15/2004 005344 THE FRAUSE GROUP INC 0404-2176 4/30/2004 AG04-63:2004 NTRL YARD C 2,433.77 Voucher: 179870 0304-2131 3/31/2004 AG04-63:2004 NTRL YARD C 281 .29 2,715,06 179871 6/15/2004 002014 THE MOORE STORE P218032-00 6/1/2004 MSF-MANUAL TIME SHEETS I 493.28 493.28 Voucher: 179871 179872 6/15/2004 008079 THREE CHICKS CATERING C 5361 6/4/2004 CD/HS-VOL DINN CATERING 3,228.10 3,228.10 Voucher: 179872 179873 6/15/2004 001424 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 1246530 6/1/2004 AG03-199:JUN04-NEW CH E 139.68 139.68 Voucher: 179873 179874 6/15/2004 004218 TIMCO INC 110813 5/25/2004 PW-REPAIR SUPPLIES 96.51 96.51 Voucher: 179874 179875 6/15/2004 000581 TOOL TOWN INC 38555 5/25/2004 PKM-SAFETY WIRE PLIERS 65.18 65.18 Voucher: 179875 179876 6/15/2004 001436 TREE RECYCLERS 40524B 5/24/2004 PKM-5/18,5/19,5/24/04 TREE F 816.00 816.00 Voucher: 179876 Page: 28 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 29 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179877 6/15/2004 008074 TRUGREEN LANDCARE LLC 3233602486 5/10/2004 AG04-31 :2004 ROW LN DSCP 9,218.50 9,218,50 Voucher: 179877 179878 6/15/2004 005767 TUMWATER POLICE GUILD T HOCH 5/26/2004 P$-T HOCH THE BULLETPRO 75.00 75,00 Voucher: 179878 179879 6/15/2004 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 89196 5/7/2004 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 104.58 Voucher: 179879 91336 5/19/2004 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 85.61 190.19 179880 6/15/2004 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 000F6588V224 5/29/2004 PS-DELIVERY SERVICE 34.12 Voucher: 179880 000F80F48204 5/15/2004 PS-DELIVERY SERVICE 11.61 45.73 179881 6/15/2004 005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE40221930-001 4/30/2004 PKM-EQUIPMENT RENTAUA 228.48 Voucher: 179881 39331115-001 3/18/2004 PKM-COARSE SANDING ST 38.84 36889445-001 2/13/2004 PKCHB-EQUIPMENT RENTAL -169.72 97.60 179882 6/15/2004 007357 UNITED REPROGRAPHICS 0064595-IN 5/18/2004 CM-COPYING OF ARCHITEC 180.33 Voucher: 179882 0042712-IN 5/11/2004 CM-COPYING OF ARCHITEC 73.60 L 0042714-IN 5/18/2004 CM-COPYING OF ARCHITEC 14.20 ~ 0064590-IN 5/17/2004 CM-COPYING OF ARCHITEC . 8.16 276.29 179883 6/15/2004 005804 UNITED STATES DEPARTMEf\TF834009 5/11/2004 PKM-04 WATERFOWL MGT S 2,410.00 2,410.00 Voucher: 179883 179884 6/15/2004 001512 URESCO CONSTRUCTION M 001-193383 5/25/2004 PKNCHB-PRIMED MDF 1,601.12 Voucher: 179884 001-193304 5/21/2004 PKNCHB-REPAIR SUPPLIES 640.79 2,241.91 179885 6/15/2004 001805 VADIS NORTHWEST 00013767 4/30/2004 AG04-28:APR04-CITY LITTER 4,101.42 Voucher: 179885 00013819 5/31/2004 AG04-28:MAY04-CITY LITTER 4,101.42 8,202.84 179886 6/15/2004 003563 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS COO02440 5/21/2004 PS-5/04-6/04 EMER DISPATC 156,499.50 Voucher: 179886 0002461 5/25/2004 PS~5/04 MDT USER FEE- 765.00 0002446 5/25/2004 PS-4/04 LANGUAGE LINE US} 119.24 157,383,74 179887 6/15/2004 004863 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION SU 70806 5/18/2004 PKNCH-CONCRETE SUPPLI 222.82 222.82 Voucher: 179887 179888 6/15/2004 004889 VAN METER & ASSOCIATES I 00-6459 5/26/2004 PS-D DEYO DAILY OPER:SKI 195.00 Voucher: 179888 00-6462 5/26/2004 PS-T HOCH ACTS 6/17/04 95.00 290.00 179889 6/15/2004 008193 VANGERPEN, SCOTT 165104 6/2/2004 PKRCS-REFUND-RECREA TI 288.00 288.00 Voucher: 179889 179890 6/15/2004 008038 VEGA ELECTRIC CO INC AG04-26 #3 5/31/2004 AG04-26:NEW CH-ELECTRICJ 104,215.20 104,215.20 Voucher: 179890 179891 6/15/2004 000618 VERDICON SO01340332.0 5/21/2004 PKM-GRASS SEED/CEL.PK. 905.22 905,22 Voucher: 179891 Page: 29 apChkLst 06/1512004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 30 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 179892 6/15/2004 003528 WA STATE CRIMINAL JUSTI 2004-0304 6/2/2004 PS-R JUNKER 1ST LV SUPER 250.00 250.00 Voucher: 179892 179893 6/15/2004 006638 W A STATE DEPT OF LlCENS 0304564 3/31/2004 MC-1/5/04-3/31/04 COpy OF R 5.80 5.80 Voucher: 179893 179894 6/15/2004 000567 WA STATE ECOLOGY DEPAR601 223538 5/1/2004 PWSWR-HAZ. WASTE EDU 46.00 46.00 Voucher: 179894 179895 6/15/2004 001208 WA STATE GENERAL ADMIN 118-1-38184 2/13/2004 MSFL T-ASPHAL TROLLER P 180.00 180.00 Voucher: 179895 179896 6/15/2004 002275 WA STATE LABOR & INDUST 135039 .5/27/2004 PKM-FACILITIES BOILER IN 35.20 35.20 Voucher: 179896 L 179897 6/15/2004 004628 WA STATE PATROL IDENTI 104010979 5/4/2004 PS-REMIT CPL FINGERPRIN 289.00 289.00 -i Voucher: 179897 . 179898 6/15/2004 000253 WA STATE TRANSPORTATIO ATB40113067 1/13/2004 PWTR-I-5(ã,)272ND FEASIBIL 10,000.00 Voucher: 179898 ATB40511182 5/11/2004 PWSCIP-SR-99 HOV LANES, I 53.66 10,053.66 179899 6/15/2004 003825 W A STATE TRANSPORT A TIO RE41 1 A5057 5/11/2004 AG03-200:APR04-1-5 TO CITY 1,212.36 1,212.36 Voucher: 179899 179900 6/15/2004 003702 WA STATE WEIGHTS & MEAS145 5/28/2004 PS-POLICE SCALE INSPECTI 30.00 30.00 Voucher: 179900 179901 6/15/2004 000067 WALDRON RESOURCES WR04-140 6/2/2004 MSF-(5/17-28) SEN FIN ACCN' 1,770.00 1,770.00 Voucher: 179901 179902 6/15/2004 006007 WALKER ACE HARDWARE 000302 5/20/2004 PKM-GRD:CNSTRCTN TOOL 27.17 Voucher: 179902 000320 6/4/2004 PKDBC-CONST TOOLS/EQP F 18.12 45.29 179903 6/15/2004 008186 WALSH, JEAN 04-101881-00 6/14/2004 PWS-RFND ROW PRMT #0 500.00 500.00 Voucher: 179903 179904 6/15/2004 002717 WASHINGTON FIRM L TD, TH 110003 5/31/2004 MSHR-DIVERSITY TRAINING 5,250.00 5,250.00 Voucher: 179904 179905 6/15/2004 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT 0041696-1055 6/1/2004 PWSWR-LiTTER DISPOSAL 337.44 337.44 Voucher: 179905 179906 6/15/2004 008096 WATSON ASPHALT PAVING CAG04-48 #2 5/28/2004 AG04-48:2004 ASPHALT OVE 244,142.38 244,142.38 Voucher: 179906 179907 6/15/2004 002567 WEARGUARD 53996422-1 5/18/2004 PWSWM-CITY JACKET FOR [ 123.97 123.97 Voucher: 179907 179908 6/15/2004 700316 WESCO 03-105293-00 6/2/2004 CDB-RFND MECH PRMT FEE 46.91 46.91 Voucher: 179908 Page: 30 Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor Page: 31 (Continued) Invoice 179909 6/15/2004 003500 WESCOM COMMUNICATIO 14738 Voucher: 179909 14739 14737 14736 374405 179910 6/15/2004 000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DIS Voucher: 179910 179911 6/15/2004 002087 WHITMAN GLOBAL CARPET (23421 Voucher: 179911 179912 6/15/2004 002087 WHITMAN GLOBAL CARPET (23420 Voucher: 179912 23422 23423 24-132042 179913 6/15/2004 002204 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY ~ Voucher: 179913 ~ 179914 6/15/2004 003380 WILSON, BRIAN ~ Voucher: 179914 179915 6/15/2004 003521 WILSON, GREG Voucher: 179915 179916 6/15/2004 007239 WINDMILL GARDENS Voucher: 179916 179917 6/15/2004 008198 WOLVERTON, TERENCE Voucher: 179917 179918 6/15/2004 001206 WSSUA-WA STATE SOFTBA 24 Voucher: 179918 179919 6/15/2004 005722 YAKIMA COUNTY DEPARTMEIAPRIL2004 Voucher: 179919 MAR 04 179920 6/15/2004 000694 lEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMF68796618 Voucher: 179920 EMPLOY REIM EMPLOY REIM 5/24/04 03-46020 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 4/24/2004 PS-CALIBRA TE RADAR SYST 157,76 4/24/2004 PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST 146,88 4/24/2004 PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST 141.44 4/24/2004 PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST 32,64 5/12/2004 MSFLT-TORO MOWER REPA 92,39 5/21/2004 AG03-11 :(MAY04)CH-CARPE 798,89 5/24/2004 MC-CARPET CLEANING SVC 398.00 5/24/2004 PKM-STL LK CARPET CLEAN 319.89 5/24/2004 PKM-MTN OFF CARPET CLE 98.89 5/14/2004 PKM-SUN TO SHADE GRASS 126.21 5/21/2004 PS-LUNCH SPOKANE POLIC 94.44 5/24/2004 PS-ANNUAL CLOTHING ALLO 275,00 5/24/2004 PWS-FLOWER BASKETS FO 3,276.51 5/24/2004 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO( 75,00 6/1/2004 AG02-77:2004 SOFTBALL UM 7,350.00 5/10/2004 PS-(APR04) JAIL SVCS AGOO- 44,854,11 4/7/2004 PS-3/04 JAIL SVCS AGOO-167 37,970,10 4/7/2004 PKRCS-FIRST AID SUPPLIES 60.17 Sub total for us bank: Check Total 478.72 92.39 798.89 816,78 126.21 94.44 275.00 3,276.51 75.00 7,350.00 82,824,21 60.17 2,579,327.13 Page: 31 apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 32 329 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 2,579,327.13 L ~ ~ Page: 32 apChkLst 06/15/2004 2:32:59PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 33 Bank code: key Check # Date 179779 6/15/2004 520662 12/16/2003 L E;"' ~ Page: 33 MEETING DATE: July 20, 2004 ITEM# j[1e) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: May 2004 Monthly Financial Report CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: IZI CONSENT D RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: May 2004 Monthly Financial Report .......-.............-....-.........................-..-............... ...................-...........................-....... ...........................................................-.-.......-..................... SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: ...................................-....... ............................ CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was reviewed at the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee at their June 29th meeting. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move for the approval of the May 2004 Monthly Financial Report." ............................ ...............",.",.................................",..-........-.......-....-...........-......................... ........................ CITY MANAGER APPRQV AL~1l (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) ................._..........-................................................................................. COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 ~ CITY OF p: -Y3 Federa I Way MEMORANDUM Date: June 29, 2004 Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee To: Via: From: David Moseley, City Manager Tho Kraus, Finance Manager Subject: May 2004 Monthly Financial Report Action Requested: Accept the May 2004 Monthly Financial Report and forward to the July 20th Council meeting for full Council approval. K:\FIN\M FR\MFRFEDRACCVR.DOC 21- ,!"~ CITY OF ,y",,~ Federal Way May 2004 Monthly Financial Report OVERVIEW The Monthly Financial Report is intended to provide an overview of financial activity that has taken place in the reporting period. This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Utility Tax Projects, Solid Waste & Recycling, HoteVMotel Lodging Tax, Paths & Trails, Surface Water Management, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay Center/Knutzen Family Theatre Operations, The Summary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures financial activity through May for the years 1999 through 2004. . :YTD Operating Revenues vs Operating Expenditures: : : : : : : : . . . ThruMay ....... .. . 1~.¡I... .~: :50.: ."."'.'.. . . . .. ... =~I~ . . . : .~----==... : ............. .......,.. :1999: .2000:.:.:2001:.:-:.2002.:.:.2003.:.:.:2004:.:-:.:-:':.:': --REVENUES -- EXPENDITURES ......... . . . . . . . . . .................. . ........... . .......... . . . . . . . ..,. . OPERATING REVENUES Operating funds revenue collections through May total $20.5M which is $279.2K or 1.3% below the ytd budget of $20,7M, Of this amount, $361K is related to Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the payment of debt services. REVENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES Period Ending May 31, 2004 (In Thousands) :~o~R."i.e"Bj,èI¡jet:: ::Aè:tj,àIS:: o)i~~n~> . >l'iNcinitikiO . . :4¡'iavorà~!.):: 0$.: . . :.>:".>. 0.0% (197) -4.3% 3 5.5% (40) -5.8% (299) -21.1% 235 35.5% (205) -25.8% 128 3.8% (32) -8.1% 118 24.0% 0.0% (42) -24.5% 0.0% (8) -16.1% 14 4.4% 32 n/, 11 3.1% (8) -3.4% 7 23.9% (248) -73.7% 0.0% 0.0% (2) -2.1% 262 78.7% (6) -13.4% (279) .1,3. 0.0% ~o~(i:¡;$ .2IJÇ3.: ::~o~oi!:::::Ti1;<M¡!¡J;:: Aèt(lal:. O/iMi!a,:: .O""'C:: >May:o $ 4.117 $ 8,108 $ 4,188 $ 4,188 4,363 10,835 4,530 4.333 55 134 47 50 654 1,714 700 660 1,157 2,811 1,414 1,115 1,165 1,900 660 895 833 1,850 796 590 3,051 7,253 3,330 3,458 532 1,184 533 500 478 1.194 494 612 94 32 32 167 377 170 128 20 6 6 ~ M2 g « 323 653 313 326 32 374 216 37 88 226 1.835 96 595 36 20,470 4.505 ruperty Taxes Sales Tax HoteVMotel Lodging Tax riminal Justice Sales Tax Intergovemmental eal Estate Exese Tax ambling Taxes Wily Taxes ourt Revenue uilding PennltsiFees-CD Expediled Review Fees-CD ROW Pennits/Fees-PW Expediled Review Fees-PW icenses Franchise Fees assport Agency Fees ecreation Fees ¡Cumas Bay Centre !Knutzen Family Theatre Interest Eamlngs ¡Admin/Cash Mgmt Fees ¡SWM Fees !Refuse Collection Fees ~olice Services ~lscelianeous/Other ¡Subtotal Oper Revenues þther Financing Sources olal '<evenues & Utn.. ¡Sources 255 222 40 174 219 1,661 95 246 53 20,015 10,959 935 500 77 832 542 3,437 169 884 111 45,442 8.539 362 223 30 336 226 1.835 98 333 42 20,750 4,505 $ 30,974 $ 53,981 $ 25,254 $ 24,975 $ (279) -1.1. D Real Estate Excise Tax .>Moriih. Jan Feb YTD Total $ Annual Total $ ... . RE.ALE.s.ikr.i;:t=xëÚ¡E; :T.ÁX:REVENUE$.. . . . Yeai:;i~;d"'t~ii;i~¡¡'~~» . Mar Apr May Jun Jut Au9 Sep Oct Nay Dee $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ~OO3 .......:>ZO:0:4::: Acta..JBud-airn:. :A.Ciua':: 307,354 $ 139,064 $ 122,026 .,338,361 105,244 147,294 129,942 119,792 199,576 193,685 135,090 243,531 196,095 161,178 182,533 219,314 179,449 271,561 200,988 262,023 190,360 349,883 198,900 - .211,217 182,866 155.412 119,118 216,540 167,951 ...ZQQ4ø.qiifilit. ..S:Var .. :%:.Var. $ (17,038) -12.3% 42,050 40.0% 79,784 70.0% 108,441 80.0% 21,355 10.0% - - - - ~ -. - - 1,165,437 $ 660,368 $ 894,959 $ 234,591 35,5% - Repre,ent, moothl, h"'o",al patterno 2,851,386 $ 1,900,000 To date, REET of $895K is above the ytd budget of $660K by $235K or 36%, Compared to 2003, collections are down $270K or 23%, May's receipt of $183K is $21K above the monthly estimate and includes a total of 277 real estate transactions, of which 89 were tax exempt and of remaining 188, 10 were mobile home sales. There were no significant transactions in May. Sales Tax Sales tax received through May of $4.33M is $197K or 4.3% below the ytd budgeted amount of $4.53M. 2004 ytd revenue of $4,33M is below May 2003 ytd revenue of $4,36M by $30K or 0,7%. The current month's receipt of $875K is below the monthly estimate of$918K by $42K or 4,6%. Morith Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jut Aug Sep Oct Nov Dee YTD Total Annual Total . ........ . . .. ............................ LOCAL RET~IL :~~L~!i!:TAJ(.REItÇN.L/ES:: . ..Yeat~fÓ.;dj¡t~t¡'rtJMåy':................. . . . . . . . >200.4::Z004SiJdget>.. . 8"d9~P::.....:Ac;tu.a.J::. .:$Viù::""::~va; $ 832,939 $ 852,298 $ 19,359 2.3% 1,219,599 1,117,609 (101,990) -8.4% 800,135 779,947 (20,188) -2.5% 759,333 707,614 (51,719) -6.8% 917,865 875,452 (42,413) -4.6% 810,673 - - 0.0% 842,783 - - 0.0% 977,041 - - 00% 939,560 - - 0.0% 897,593 - - 0.0% 948,531 - - 0.0% 889,101 - - 0.0% 2ÒÒj. .>Ar;tWl . $ 822,996 $ 1,185,480 $ 735,211 $ 745,691 $ 874,035 $ 789,466 $ 833,909 $ 963,561 $ 939.487 $ 872,821 $ 914,692 $ 840,881 $ 4,363,413 $ 4,529,871 $ 4,332,920 $ (196,951) -4,3% 'Budget Is projected based on past 5 yeafs history. $ 10,518,230 $ 10,835,153 Citv of Federal War Sales Tax by SIC Code ... ...... ............ . ......... . .ÇQMPARrsot( QF$~LE$ iAXCC£;I.E;CTrCNS8YSIC GRo/Jp... . .... .........~Year.~to-datethÍ'iJMay .... ....... Coinpoir(mt<2()()3~ .. .Z(j(j4Cha~ef(o""2(J(}:J. . . . Groi/p<. . :..Äèitiii(. .:ACtus,~ . . . . $.. : ....~>. Retail Trade $ 2,861,689 $ 2,919.876 $ 58.187 2,0% Services 530,006 532,978 2,972 0,6% ConstrucUContract 435,934 328.419 (107,515) -24,7% Wholesaling 193,305 194,647 1,342 0,7% ransp/CommlUtility 164,552 178,090 13,538 8.2% Manufacturing 47,611 47,993 382 0,8% Government 33,509 11,770 (21.739) -64,9% Finllns/Real Estate 63.463 85.972 22.509 35,5% Other 33,344 33,175 (169) -0,5% Total $ 4,363,413 $ 4,332,920 $ (30,494) -a.7o¡, Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales tax revenue, accounting for 67% of all sales tax collections. Ytd retail sales tax collection is $58K or 2% above ytd 2003. The increase is mainly attributable to increased consumer spending in retail general merchandise, furniture, retail food stores, and retail eating and drinking; but is offset by misc. retail trade. Services industry accounts for 12% of the total sales tax collections through May. On ytd basis, services sales tax is up $3K or 0.6% compared to ytd 2003. The increase is mainly attributable to the increased activity in business services, but offset by a decrease in amusement activity due to a one-time distribution received in early 2003 for new installations at one ofthe major amusement facilities. Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for 7,6% of sales tax collections, is $108K or 25% below ytd 2003's activity. Finance/Insurance/Real Estate sales tax is up $23K compared to 2003 and is due to one-time audit corrections on one of major banking services for the years 1998 through 2001. SALES TAX ACTIVITY BY SIC CODE YTDThrough May 2004 T ranspiCommlUti I 4.1% Manufacturing 1.1% Government 0.3% WhOlesaling 4.5% Constr/Cntract 7.6% Retail Trade 67.4% Services 12.3% It.f Mav 1004 Monthlv Financial Report Sales Tax Activity by Area SALES TAX COMPARISON by AREA YTD Throug/JMay Chg from 2003 Group 2003 2004 $ % Total Sales Tax $4,363,413 $4,332,920 ($30,494) .().7"1o S 348th Retail Block $565,725 $562,771 ($2,954) .().5"1o % chg from prev yr -2.0% -0.5% na na Percentage of total 13.0% 13.0"/0 0.0"/0 0.2% SeaTac Mall 393,560 348,308 (45,252) -11,5"10 % chg from prev yr -8.3% -11.5% na na Percentage of total 9.0% 8,0"/0 -1. 0"/0 -10,9% Major Auto Sales 175,566 177,985 2,419 1.4"10 % chg from prev yr -5,5% 1.4% na na Percentage of total 4,0"10 4.1% 0.1% 2.1% S 312th to S 316th 229,827 246,399 16,572 7.2"10 % chg from prev yr 5.2% 7.2% na na Percentage of total 5.3% 5.7% 0.4% 8.0"/0 Pavilion Center 208,203 214,243 6,040 2.9"10 % chg from prev yr -8,3% 2,9% na na Percentage of to/at 4.8% 4.9% 0.2% 3.6% Hotels & Motels 52,693 46,193 (6,500) -12.3% % chg from prev yr 52.0% -12.3% na na Percentage of total 1.2% 1.1% -0.1% -11.7% The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which generates 13% of the City's sales tax experienced a decrease of $3K or 0,5% when compared to the year 2003. Retail building materials and general merchandise are up, but are offset by declines in retail furniture, retail eating & drinking and wholesale durable goods. SeaTac Mall is showing a decrease of $45K or 11.5% compared to year 2003 activity. The year-to-date tax from the Mall's department stores, which generate 62% of the Mall's sales tax, has decreased $26K or 11% compared to 2003. Major Auto Sales through May have collected $178K, which is $2K or 1.4% above the same period in 2003. S 312tb to S316tb is up $17K or 7.2% from the prior year. The increase is attributable to $19K increase by the center's biggest box retailer. Pavilion Center is up $6K, or 2.9% from the same period of prior year. The center's biggest contributor, who is responsible for about one-half of the center's total sales, is picking up its sales again and is up $8K compared to 2003. Hotels & Motels sales tax collected through May total $46K, which is $6,5K or 12% below the same period in 2003. The variance is mainly due to the extra payments received in early 2003 for 2002's late returns and increased activity in one of the major hotel. CitvofFederal Wav Sales Tax By Area Thru May 2004 S312thtoS316th 5.7% Pavilion Center 4 g% Hotels & Motels - -- ----~ 1.1% SeaTac Mall 8.0% AU Othe~ 63.2% Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax HotelfMotel lodging tax collections through May total $49.6K, which is $2.6K or 5.5% above the year-to-date budget of$47K. Compare to 2003, the lodging tax is $6K or 10.5% below the same period in 2003, The variance is mainly due to the extra payments received in early 2003 for 2002's late returns and increased activity in one of the major hotel. HOTEUMOTEL LODGING TAX REVENUES Year-ro-date thru May 2003 2004 2004 Budget Month Actual Budget. Actual $ Var % Var Jan 8,122 8,234 9,377 1,143 13.9% Feb 12,316 9,430 11,529 2,099 22.3% Mar 12,153 8,848 7,340 (1,508) -17.0% Apr 11,436 9,485 11,775 2,290 24,1% May 11,449 11,044 9,613 (1,431) -13.0% Jun 9,109 9,124 -I - - Jul 12,110 11,340 - - - Aug 12,577 12,020 - - Sap 15,666 15,407 - - - Oct 14,909 14,426 - - - Nov 12,246 12,351 - - - Dee 9,947 12,291 - - - YTD Total 55,475 47,041 49,635 2,594 5.5% Grand Total $ 142,041 $ 134,000 Gambling Tax Gambling tax collection of$590K is $205K or 25.8% below the year-to-date budget of $796K. In comparison to 2003 year-to-date collections, 2004's tax collection is lower by $243K or 29.2%. May's collection of $118K is $43K or 26,8% below the monthly budget estimate of $161K. The decrease is mainly attributable to the closure of three card room establishments. .1-5 Mav 2004 Monthlv Financial Report Monlh Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Noy Dee YTD Total Grand Total . . GAMBI:JNGTAX REVENUE .."."YfDThroiighMilY " ,,- -"~004-' 200:1 IJlI~.nct Ac:lu.,1 $159,323 156,889 $ 115,177 152,943 152,395 113,514 160,415 147,282 112,880 176,029 177,807 130,566 184,574 161,175 117,979 160,030 157,731 - 167.736 153,416 - 143,130 131,910 - .- 153,398 142,942 - --. 164,713 164,956 93,167 152,549 88,537 150,948 833,284 795,548 590,117 (205,431) -25.8% 1,803,996 1,850,000 2ÓÕ4 'Bllclgct S Vi.lr "" Vilr $(-4f:fÙ) '~-6-:6% (38,881) -25.5% - (34,402) -23.4% (47,241) -26,6% (43,196) -26,8% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Utility Tax Council approved an ordinance earlier 2003 that would provide utility tax relief for low income seniors, The ordinance would relieve the full 6% of the utility tax to eligible citizens through a City administered "rebate" program. Year-to-date, 71 rebates totaling $4K have been processed. I ............ . ~tiirrYtAXfi$ .. . .ÝtÙit:iÓ"diÛ~t¡j¡:fi Mlty . . I :2003: .........:2004:...... iOO4su.dget... .:N¡¡)i1ibAcitiiÌÚ" ::jòiMBdiIf" .:Attjjj¡isv¡'-;%iiøi Jan $ 519,082 $ 632,154 $ 687,590 $ 55,436 8.8% Feb 541,210 650,483 741,009 90,526 13.9% Mar 611,927 667,054 704,997 37,943 5.7% Apr 682,144 730,692 709,308 (21,384) -2.9% May 696,681 649,725 617,502 (32,223) -5.0% Jun 563,872 557,502 - - 0.0% Jul 540,460 546,750 - - 0.0% Aug 521,251 518,395 -- - - 0.0% Sap 540,705 523,639 - - 0.0% Oct 571,961 599,528 - - 0.0% Nov 557,063 572,915 - - 0.0% Dee 637,771 604,185 - - 0.0% Jax Rebate - - (4,357) (4,357) nfa YTD Total $ 3,051,044 $ 3,330,109 $ 3,456,050 $ 125,941 3.8% Utility taxes received through May total $3.46M, which is $126K or 4% above the ytd budget total of $3.33M, The ytd thru May utility tax receipt is above the same period in 2003 by $405K or 13%. Gas taxes are above the ytd budget of $523K by $140K or 27%. Electricity is below the ytd budget of $I,2M by $51K or 4%. Cable taxes are about the same as the ytd budget of $316K. Phone taxes are below the ytd budget of $460K by $26K or 6%. Cellular phone taxes are above the ytd budget of $S30K by $49K or 9%. The rate hikes in mid and late 2003 by Puget Sound Energy and the severe cold winter weather have attributed to the increase in ytd gas tax collected. Compared to ytd 2003, Electricity is up $35K or 3%, Gas is up $218K or 49%, Cable is up $28K or 10%, Phone is down $3K or 1 %, and Cellular phone is up $96K or 20%. Citv of Federal Waf I I . iJrj wY: TAXES .......... . . . Y~r-irHtaietfriv May 2004 VIDBdgf T AttiJàf . $ 1,209,149j'$ 1,157,792 523,085 662,668 186,580 I 210.624 ---- 316,130 I 316,407 459.7()2~1. - 433,511 530,318 579.661 3.415 1.928 101,729 97,817 -I (4,357) $ 3,330,1091 $ - 3.456,050 roo4 Budge(. .: ivai: :%vá,: $ (51,357) -4.2"1. 139,583 26.7°Æ 24,044 12.9"Æ 277 0.1°Æ (26,191) -5.7°Æ 49,342 9.3°Æ (1,487) -43.5'Æ (3,912) -3.6'!. (4,357) nJa $ 125,941 3_8"/. Electric Gas Solid Waste Cable Phone Cellular Pager S'NM ax Rebate Total : :2003: : : . . .: AètiJaI. . : $ 1,123,174 444,774 177, 656 288,823 436,æo 483,352 3,242 93,993 : :Aiititi9iBiJgt: $ 2.494,586 659,213 467,765 765,874 1,105,572 1,353,979 6,662 199,148 . . - $ 3,051,044 $ 7,253,021 Utility Tax Revenue YTD Thru May 2004 Cellular 16.8% Gas 19.2% Electric 33.5% Phone 12.5% State Shared Revenue Ytd distribution of $1.77M is below the ytd budget of $2.11M by $339K or 16.0%. The unfavorable variance is due mainly to vehicle licensing fees which the City will not receive, and decreases in local criminal justice sales tax collection and criminal justice low population. .................. .. ~Ar1!$ffARtÞ ~NV6$ .. .. ..:'(eaNo,d¡¡~thlvMaY.. . : ZOO3: : . .. ...... . :':2004... 2iJ(J4 Bi.IiJiftit, : :~ue: : : :AciUai: : : : :èt.id(jei* . AitiJ¡j¡ :$va';: :YoVai< Mota- Vehide Excise Tax $ - $ - $ $ nJa Oty Hardship Assistance - - - nJa Camper Excise Tax - - - nJa Liquor Prof~s Tax 171,691 124,297 135,177 10,661 8.8% Liquor Excise Tax 151,208 150,066 163,941 13,873 9.2% Crim Just Loo-Pop1DCD 37,763 117,956 37,145 (60,611) -66.5% Crim Just Hgh Crime 81,445 - 84,919 84,919 100.0% Equalization - - nJa Local Crim Just Sales Tax 654, 148 699,925 659,652 (40,274) -5.6% Fuel Tax 689,709 704,743 686,752 (17,991) -2.6% Veh LicII Fees 16,196 310,067 - (310,067) -100.0% DUI-Cities 7,039 6,759 7,063 304 100.0% Local Govt Fin Asst - - nJa Total $ 1,611,198 $ 2,113,634 $ 1,774,649 $ (339,186) -16,0% . Year-to-dale budget estimate. Building Permits and Plan Check Fees Ytd building permit revenues total $612K, which is above the ytd budget by $118K or 24%. This does not include ytd pass through revenues of $32K. Revenues collected for expedited review is currently not budgeted nor are the offsetting expenditures. Building permits, which includes mechanical, plumbing and clear/grade permits total $321K and is above the ytd budget by $77K or 32%, Electrical permits of $50K are above the ytd budget of $48K by $2,1 K or 4%. Plan check fees of $188K are $27K or 17% above the ytd budget estimate of $162K. Mav 2004 Monthlv Financial Report .. ...... :ÇQMl,fIlNITY[)!V6L()PM!NT . . BUI~{)INC7. P.E.~~ITSßaNJNGFEESIPLANCHECKÆÈS . .. ... .:199gc.zOO4 . . 20.0.3:: . 20042004Sti¡1¡jlit: . . : Actual :sti¡1¡jlil -Aèt'¡al~. sitar. :;y.ilai-. $ 134,380 $ 117,094 $ 68~3~ $ (46,656) -41.6% 66,531 72,326 . ~175,557 103,230 142.7% 94,599 106,392 110,590 2,196 2.0% 73,435 93,610 137,906 44,097 47.0% 104,776 102,356 _119,897 17,541 17.1% 166,606 137,109 - -_u 134,493 103,621 110,152 102,965 116,571 116,178 70,506 79,543 109.963 76,197 67,010 62,419 YTD Total $ 475,721 $ 493,976 $ 612.366 $ 118,408 Annual Total $ 1,293,244 $ 1,194,009 1,112,777 1,000,329 42.8% 49.4% Revel1Ue . ~uary February March April May June July August September October November December - - - ~- - - - -- - - - - - - -- na 24.0"10 na na na Exp thru Dec" Recovery Ratio 1,g47,590 56.5% na na na .. Expenditures include Community Development Admin, Planning, and Building. The following table presents a synopsis of ytd building permit activity as of May 31st for new construction between 2002 and 2004. Building Division - Permit Activity YTD Through May. 2004 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 . TYÞ'.ofPet!jli)... ...~.:-: ..\'~It!e.(~¡.:. .:.JII9-: V'lú~(~j.. . NbC-: . -:.V.lue(SI... New Residential (Platted) 40 $ 7,3 I 8,043 55 S 12,863,420 32 $ 6,828,090 New Commercial 12 29,758,776 2 445,972 II 32,881,461 New Multi-Family Units I 1 1.042,389 New Public Subtotal -New Construction 53 S 37,076,819 58 S 14.351.781 43 S 39,709,551 Manufactured Homes Residential Altmtions 58 1,573,836 55 1.724,279 53 2,042,265 Commercial Altmtions 195 11,815,269 83 7,268.780 105 8,339,880 Plwnbing Only 37 41 49 Mechanical Only 130 607,975 128 448,708 173 758,348 Misc. Buildin, Pennits . Subtotal - Alterations 420 $ 13,997,080 307 $ 9,441,767 380 $ 11,140,493 Electrical Pennits 527 439 479 Total Building Permits 1000 ~ 51.073.899 804 $ 23.793,548 902 $ 50,850.044 Non-Building Permit" Si.. Pennits 107 228,417 99 239.533 77 223,167 Totals 107 $ 228,417 99 $ 239.533 77 S 223,167 hotal Commercial Valuation 207 $ 41.574,045 85 $ 7.714.752 116 $ 41.221,341 ICommercial as a % of Total 21'\1. 81% 11% 32% 13% 81% . Includes all new, alteration ROW Permits and Fees Overall Public Works permits and fees collected through May total $128K, which is $42K or 25% below the ytd budget of $170K. Right-of-way permits collected total $34K which is $53K or 61 % below the ytd budget of $87K. Plan review fees collected total $58K which is $4K or 6% below the ytd budget of $62K. Public works inspection fees of $37K is $15K or 68% above the ytd budget of$22K. ICp Citv of Federal Wav : . PUBLIC woRks PERMITS/PLAN REVlEWIlNSPEcrioN FEES . ...................... .. ..... ... ............. .. .................2iJiJj~2004. ... ............... .>2003. . . . . . .2004< . .. .-lOlJ4E3udget .. Actual Bii¡fQ&1 . ActiÙ/< : :SY~i< . . . >%Vili: $ 31,391 $ 36,426 $ 21,128 $ (15,299) -42.0% 16,851 28,794 34,076 5,282 18.3% 76,604 36,098 28,113 (7,985) -22.1% 14,823 36,275 21,779 (14,496) -40.0% 26,878 32,401 23,236 (9,165) -28.3% 29,063 31.807 - - - 22,556 27,485 - - - 25,430 32,648 - - 41,158 28,540 - - 14,878 22,820 - - 14,439 26,778 - - 82,170 37,223 - - $166,547 $169,994 $ 128,331 $ (41,663) Grand Total $ 396,240 $ 377,296 na na Month Ave 33,020 31,441 25,666 January February March April May June July August September October November December YTD Total -24,5% Court Revenue Fines and forfeitures revenue is $81K or 19% below the ytd budget total of $433K. Including probation revenue, the total collected through May amounts to $500K which is $32K or 6% below last year's collections. Court filings (which the City is compensated on) are down 22% ytd from 2003. Additionally the City's share of total municipal court revenue is down 3% ytd from 2003 due to state legislative action, which resulted in decreased revenue to the City. Probation services revenue total $149K and is $49K or 49% above the ytd budget. Ytd probation expenditures total $129K resulting in net probation revenue of $19K. ..vrDTótaJ.. ttttli Màý Revenue Expenses Net Revenue : Ptobatroi'l SéYic:~ > <2004:> ...>Budget::. > ActU¡j1 > $ 100,000 $ 148,894 $ 100,000 129,434 - $ 19,460 na : Chaligè:ftÓiTi Budgèt:: .<$:Var:... :<$Var". 48,894 48.9% (29,434) -29.4% $ na COURT REVENUE By Month Budoet $908,813 $1,005.975 I 2003 2004 2004 Budget Month Actual Budget Actual $Var %Var January $55,400 75,632 $65,393 ($10,239) -13.5% February $78,815 85,854 72,879 (12,975) -15.1% March $82,635 96,534 72,423 (24,111) -25.0% April $73,723 94,279 72,468 (21,812) -23.1% May $87,131 80,256 68,128 (12,128) -15.1% June $77,763 84,172 July $70,613 80,239 August $57,817 87,278 September $64,752 77,991 October $77,681 84,582 November $61,858 77,386 December $97,011 81.774 Year-to-date Total $357,793 $432,554 $351,290 ($81,264) -18,8% Probation Services 174,057 100,000 148,894 48,894 48.9% Trail Schl Adm Fee o 0 0 0 0.0% Total $531,851 532,554 $500.184 ($32,370) ~,1% . Induded in Court Revenue are Probation Services and remittances "om District Court for 'Shared Court, Costs-. 'Court Record Services' and Other Court-related miscellaneous revenue. Traffic School is now included in Police Revenues. If Mav 2004 Monthlv Financial Reoort Traffic and non-parking fines total $216K and is $36K or 14% below the ytd budget, and compared to ytd 2003, collections remained at the same level. Parking infractions total $17K and is $lOK or 37% below the ytd budget, and compared to ytd 2003, collections are below by 31 %. DUI and other misdemeanors total $S8K and is $ISK or 21 % below the ytd budget, and compared to ytd 2003, collections are below by 1 %. - Criminal costs total $36K and is $8K or 17% below the ytd budget, and compared to ytd 2003, collections are above by 16%. .. ............... .. . .CQUiÜ:RÈVÈNUE ~~---~~""~~""~~""~~""~~""~~-"~.;~~~c~t~~ itiriiughMay. . ... . ...................... . . ............ ..:.::...:.:..::2004 . ......... .:AR,,"¡~I::::.YTD. :::2oaà::. ::$Wø!i~f:.:~i¡i!g~i $2,353 $7,251 $3,118 $216,217 584,879 251,489 $24,189 62,169 26,732 $58,869 171,278 73,647 $22,767 69,831 30,026 $31,261 102,454 44,054 $2,138 8,113 3.489 357,793 1,005,975 432,554 I 174,057 I 240,000 I 100,000 o 0 0 I 531,851 I 1,245,975 I 532,554 na Civil Penalties Traffic & Non-Parking Parking Infractions DUI & Other Mlsd Criminal Traffic Misd Criminal Costs. Shared Court Costs Subtotal Probation Services Tratt Schl Adm Fee Total 'Criminal "",Is include Sf"..ne, fee<. .. OPERATING EXPENDITURES .:2ó04:SiJilge(: ..... .. <Ac.wai.:. ::i.ìt..¡.::: $4,779 1,661 $215,641 (35,848) $16,717 (10,014) $58,148 (15,499) $17,583 (12,443) $36.412 (7,841) $2,009 (1.480) 351,290 (81,264) 148,894 I 48.894 0 o 500,184 I (32,370) ::.i.ìt..r::: 53.3% -14.3% -37.5% -21.0% -41.4% -17.3% -42.4% -18,8% 48.9% 0.0% -6,1% Operating funds expenditures through May total $15.2M or 33% of the annual operating budget of $45.4M, Operating expenditures are below the ytd budget of $15,7M by $0.6M or 4%. EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT Period Ending May 31, 2004 In Thousands) . . . . . . 2004 ReYlsed: Budàlit ::Ac.tù3Is:: ..::2003.: . ::kh;~i< $ 180 273 580 719 390 1,286 6,349 380 1,280 1,212 201 110 8 752 24 218 73 14036 13,553 .r¡;':~¡'g¡'. :::'A~;;u:ai:: ...::lv\a.y .:: $ 288 $ 191 758 315 1,349 582 2,043 812 1,427 596 3,887 1,536 15,919 6,448 1,384 478 4,043 1,465 4,032 1,410 1,271 212 368 141 351 57 2,480 927 5,070 299 502 204 179 67 45351 15,739 17,154 10,526 Uses. . . . . ~ity Council City Manager Municipal Court.Operations Management Services Civil/Criminal Legal Services Comm. Development SVc5 Police Services ~ail Services Parks and Recreation Public Works ~ity Overlay Program Solid Waste HotelfMotel Lodging Tax Surface Water Management Debt Service Dumas Bay Cenlre Knutzen Familv Theatre Subtotal Oper Exp Other FinancinQ Uses' otal t::xpenclltures & Other Uses $ 27,589 $ 62,505 $ 26,265 $ 25,712 $ 553 rUtner .rnancrO9 Uses are thOse actrVRJeS conSrderea one tIme rn nature. .:.Varlance:. . . ¡ra"orabi,;:: . . rtirougti... .iiJ~ia)i~raQlei... : > May> >.> $.:".. ..::0/.:-:-: $ 189 $ 1 0.7% 298 17 5.4% 564 19 3.2% 748 64 7.9% 504 92 15.4% 1.461 75 4.9% 6,339 109 1.7% 347 130 27.3% 1,425 40 2.7% 1.398 12 0.9% 212 - 0.0% 127 14 10,1% 57 0.0% 938 (11) -1.1% 299 0.0% 201 3 1.5% 80 (13 -19.7% 15186 553 3,5% 10,526 nla 2.1% Citv of Federal Wav City Council City Council expenditures total $189K, which is below the ytd budget total of$191K by $IK or 1%. City Manager Activity through May totals $298K, which is below the ytd budget total of $3l5K by $17K or 5%. Municipal Court Municipal Court expenditures total $564K, which is below the ytd budget total of$582K by $19K or 3%. Civil/Criminal Legal Services Law expenditures through May total $504K, which is below the ytd budget total of$596K by $92K or 15%. Savings are primarily in one-time funded programs such as domestic violence and labor arbitration. Management Services Management Services expenditures through May total $748K, which is below the ytd budget total of $8l2K by $64K or 8%. Savings are primarily in various one-time funded programs. Community Development Community Development expenditures through May total $1.46M, which is below the ytd budget total of $1.54M by $75K or 5%. Savings are primarily in various one-time funded programs. Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax Ytd expenditures total $57K and are comprised of tourism promotion ($18K), General Fund admin fees ($5K), events planning-Farmers Market, Korean Cultural & Sports Festival and Women's Marathon/Sporting Event ($30K), distribution of rack cards ($3K), and misc. ($lK). Overall revenues total $51 K and are made up of hoteVmotel tax ($50K), interest earnings ($lK), and postcard sales of($12.88). Public Works Public Works Operations: Public Works Operating expenditures are below the May ytd budget of $1.41M by $12K or 1%. Solid Waste and Recycling Operations: Expenditures are below the May ytd budget of $141K by $14K or 10%, Savings are attributable to timing of grant programs. Surface Water Management Operations: Expenditures are above the May ytd budget of $927K by $llK or 1%. The ytd expenditures include $27K of 2003 invoices, including the SWM collection fee, which were paid in 2004. These expenditures will reverse out at the end of the year. Public Safety Operations Police Services have expended $6.34M through May, which is below the ytd estimated budget of $6.45M by $109K or 2%, Year-to-date Police overtime is 24% or approximately $54K below the same period last year. There is a $7K increase in IB Mav 2004 Monthlv Financial Report overtime for contracted services and the homeland security programs. When the increase from the billable overtime is included, the total overtime is decreased by 18% or around $46K, during the first five months of the year. Court related overtime accounts for $23K or 10.7% of 2004's total overtime. The court case flow work group is currently evaluating opportunities to reduce police overtime for court appearances. PS Overtime By Type 2003 2004 16,537 8,804 22,023 22,759 160,668 116,523 2,275 23,867 225,370 28,796 5,067 33,863 41,045 $ 259,233 $212,739 $ $ % (7,734) -47% 736 3% (44,145) -27% (2,275) -100% (259) -1% (53,677) -24% 12,249 43% (5,067) 0% 7,182 21% (46,494) -18% Type Training Court Field Operation SOAP Other City Portion Contract or Grant $ Homeland Sec, Billable Grand Total 23,607 171,693 $ 41,045 As shown by the month-to-month overtime comparison graph, 2004 montWy expenses continue to decline over the levels from both 2002 and 2003. Police Overtime Expense $120.000 --+-2002 -- 2003 -.lr-2004 $100,000 $80,000 '" ~ $60,000 0 $40,000 $20,000 $0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dee Month Jail Services The table below compares activity through April as May invoices have not been received. The April jail services invoice from the City of Fife has not been received yet. Jail Services is below the ytd budget of $478K by $130K or 27%. Citvo(Federal Way May 2004 Monthly Financial Report .. Jair=~/).</.<!.»)<.::. of :2Ø)f:::::::::::::::: :>::Qisi:IïóRiBgt.: ..::~~>:::: :::>$:~:::.~. . 114,278 $ 84,800 $ 29,392 25.7"!c 115.404 81,184 34,220 29.;' .- 123,975 100,151 17,825 14.4°1< 123,922 75,173 48,748 39.~ 129,705 122,149 128.504 117.146 1œ.569 104.296 97,974 97,137 $ 1fT1$9 $ 347,395 $ 130,185 27.~¡' $ 1,384,060 nil nil Recreation and Cultural Services: Direct program expenditures total $430K or 32% of the total annual budget of $1.36M not including indirect costs. Including indirect administration costs, recreation expenditures total $571K and are 33% of the total annual budget of $1. 73M. Recreation fees total $372K and are 41 % of the total annual budget of $907K. Recreation fees have recovered 87% of direct program costs and is 20% above the annual budgeted recovery ratio of 67%. Considering indirect administration costs, the recovery ratio is reduced to 65% or 13% above the annual budgeted recovery ratio of 52%. Dumas Bay Centre: Dumas Bay Centre operating revenues of $2l6K are down by $8K or 3% compared to the ytd budget of $223K. Operating expenditures through May total $201K, which is $3K or 2% below the ytd budget of $204K. Dumas Bay Centre has recovered 107% of its operating expenses. Knutzen Family Theatre: Operating revenues of $37K. are up $7K or 24% compared to the ytd budget of $30K. Operating expenditures through May total $80K, which is $13K or 20% above the ytd budget of $67K. Knutzen Theatre bas recovered 46% of its operating expenses. Professional services expenditures are high for the first few months of the year, but will drop off for the summer. Electrical repair & maintenance expenditures were made for the winches, which are not expected to recur in the near term. Parks and Recreation Parks Operations expenditures through May total $1.43M, which is $40K or 3% below the ytd budget of $l.46M. The growth in Senior Services revenue is due to the popularity of the trips and tours program. Recreation Ine program growth is due to increased registration as the program has become better known in the area. The number of programs offered has been slowly increased based on interest. ::::: :-:.:::.:::::::.:.:.: ::.:::..:'.'... '.:.:-:.::.::.:.:-:-:.::.:.:.::-:.:.::::::.::.:::-:.:-:.: .::....... . : :..-:. -:-:.:.:::::::-:-:-:.::::-:-:-:.:-: ::::-::::-:-:.:-::::-:-:-:.:: . .. ...... ...... ...... .. ... ......... ...,.... "....",....,... ........ ... .... ..........'. ............ ............... ==~~ RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS 41 2.1% 20.626 42.160 47.90/. 108.667 28.478 48.4"1. 87.565 106.050 53.3% 113.742 57.939 34.9% 138.325 12.888 45.2% 90.993 22,673 128.1% 53.764 515 103.0% 1.800 18,100 73.3% 41.200 13,347 114.50/. 84.280 70.006 22.3,.. 620.614 372,195 41.0% S 1.361.576 $ - 0.0% 369.929 $ 906.9!50 $ 372,195 41.0% $ 1,731,505 $ DUMAS BAY CENlRE 215.674 43.4% 501.630 36.507 47.7% 119.117 252,181 44.0% S 680,807 $ - nla 93.529 $ 1,480,301 $ 624,371 42.2"10 $ 2,505,841 $ Steel Lake Aquatics Arts & Special Events Youth Athletics Adult AthleticS Community Recreation Community Center Rect8ation Inc Youth Commission Red. White & Blue. Senior Services Kenneth Jones Pool Subtotal Administration TOTAL RECREATION 2.000 88.100 58.800 199.000 166.000 28.500 17.700 500 24.700 7.650 314,000 $ 906,950 S 0.6% 47.3% 28.7% 31.5% 44.4% 35.6% 41.4% 51.5% 4.0% 31.8% 27.7% 31.8% 38.2% 33.0% 131 51.382 25.125 35.821 61,432 32,392 22.248 927 1,654 26,760 171.842 429,717 141.348 571,065 9.7% 81.1% 67.2% 175.0-4 120.0% 31.3% 32.9% 27.8.4 60.0% 9.1% 50.6% 66.6% nIB 52.4% 31.4% 82.1% 113.3% 296.1% 94.3% 39.8% 101.9% 55.6% ¡Va 49.9% 40.7% 88.6" nla 65.2% - Dumas Bav Centre 496.750 Knutzen Family Theatre 76.601 TOTAL DUMAS BAY CENTRE $ 573,351 $ 200.777 80,232 281,010 21.294 813,368 40.0% 44.8% .41.3% 22.8% 34.9% 99.0% 42.8% 84.2% nla 59.1% 107.4% 45.5% 89.7% nla 71.5% Arts Commission GRAND TOTAL - ~ do not Include granIs Of _aOrIu""""'. ~ do no! include I8Sidu8I equity wansre,. Of Gillet ìnIoñInd COtoIIiIUlons. . Red. W,,"- & Ilk» - - KIng Countyg...-Ior 2003","ch- - inZOlM -""" ......". in ~.200< wiII.-.eC<ll""'~.. Citv of Federal War Mav 2004 Monthlv Financial Report FUND ACTIVITY SUMMARY 0 0000000... .. << 00000..'. : ElecjjnrilngÞ.iJijd:: :<::. :'0: ::... .0""00'0 o. 0 00 0 000.0 :Balai:iCe:ilt:1i':1/Q4:::~xpiÚ1Ìiiur~$ : f.letlÍ1cOmidni{Oùt):' GeneraVStreet Fund: Debt Service Fund: (1) Special Revenue: Arterial Street Utility Tax (1) Solid Waste & Recycling Special Study (Gov. TV) Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 2% for the Arts CDBG Paths & Trails Subtotal Special Revenue Funds Capital Project: Municipal Facility Downtown Revitalization Unallocated 1997 Bond Proceeds Community/Senior Center/Pool Celebration Park Park Improvements Surface Water Management Transportation Subtotal Capital Projects Enterprise Funds: Surface Water Management Dumas Bay Centre Operations Dumas Bay Centre Capital Knutzen Family Theatre Capital Knutzen Family Theatre Operations Subtotal Enterprise Funds Internal Service Funds: (2) Risk Management Information Systems Mail & Duplication Fleet & Equipment Buildings & Fumishings Subtotal Internal Service Funds $ 6,109,614 $ 14,878,741 $ 16,958,588 $ (2,079,847) $ 1,546,124 - 1,212,416 (803,062) 72,953 (5,318) (5,976) (7,360) (18,741) 3,732 448,644 2,599,652 3,220,131 1,674,006 (558,828) - - - 1,311,404 473 902,827 (411,402) 5,013,260 6,257,735 483,750 803,062 142,776 29,723 216,999 9,710 9,795 1,424,221 3,461,469 199,577 5,177 50,754 211,805 4,264,531 126,624 10,496 56,730 7,360 67,867 - 694,324 14,897 122,005 336 56,405 887,967 - 49,126 3,732 5,194,056 4,745,413 - 220,421 (69,950) 33,748 (15,377) 41,859 210,700 Total All Funds $ 61,864,723 $ 38,291,463 $ 31,020,140 $ 7,271,324 $ (1) Utility Tax and Debt Service fund balance is reserved for the payment of debt service. (2) Internal Service fund balance is comprised of accumulated replacement reserves for the purpose of fixed asset replacement, with the exception of Risk Management, which is comprised of accumulated reserves for self-insurance and strategic reserve. - 1,695,816 6,923,229 695,196 1,254,023 - - - - 17,087,417 115,735 829,123 6,538,635 8,369,009 39,863,147 1,686,442 473 1,019,136 254,987 7,352,685 11,008,919 375,038 116,309 666,388 2,339,425 4,751,183 935,697 (22,234) 266,881 50,623 8,005 1,238,971 1,839,136 215,674 122,005 336 136,637 2,313,788 1,144,812 200,777 80,232 1,425,821 4,014,558 1,876,477 162,878 2,248,095 55,516 8,357,524 284,924 628,098 82,869 514,576 165,361 1,675,828 64,503 698,048 49,121 529,953 123,503 1,465,128 LtG o. . 0""'00' . 0 0 0 0.0.... :S/:J1i200.,t:: 6,029,767 4,145,776 1,696,166 - 215,729 24,405 211,023 2,350 (8,946) 3,732 2,144,459 6,364,402 - - - - 18,398,821 116,208 1,731,950 6,127,233 13,382,269 46,120,882 1,630,021 (7,337) 388,886 50,959 64,409 2,126,937 4,234,979 1,806,526 196,626 2,232,718 97,374 8,568,224 69,136,047 Citv of Federal Waf " ..' , , , , , , . . . , Só¡jr~rii¡j~~ . ! ! 1999 '$ 17,580.,138 $ 18,0.50.,656 $ .20.0:0> Beginning Fund Balance Operating Revenues Property Taxes Sales Tax Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax Criminal Justice Sales Tax Intergovernmental Real Estate Excise Tax Gambling Taxes Utility Taxes Court Revenue Building PennitsiFees-CD Expedited Review Fees-CD ROW PennitsiFees-PW Expedited Review Fees-PW Licenses Franchise Fees Passport Agency Fees Recreation Fees Dumas Bay Centre Knutzen Family Theatre Interest Earnings Admin/Cash Mgmt Fees SWM Fees Refuse Coliection Fees Police Services Miscellaneous/Other olal Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures City Council City Manager Municipal Court-Operations Management Services CiviVCriminal Legal Services Comm, Development Svcs Police Services Jail Services Parks and Recreation Public Works City Overlay Program Solid Waste Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax Surlace Water Management Debt Service Dumas Bay Centre Knutzen Famil Theatre Tolal Operating Expenditures Operating Revenues over/(under) Operatlno Expenditures Other Financing Sources Other Financing Uses Ending Fund Balance Solid Waste Arterial Street Utility Tax Snow & Ice Removal Surface Water Management Path & Trails Strategic Reserve Debt Service Dumas Bay Centre Operations Knutzen Family Theatre Police P3 Interfund Loans Unreserved Tolal Endln" Fund Balance 3,071,349 3,858,373 583,527 2,132,862 809,202 574,265 2,383,260 357,549 567,659 33,402 103,310 20,498 76,984 236,988 215,321 193,076 17,055 469,482 70,200 1,452,882 62,441 157,844 45406 17,492,936 116,237 248,297 691,198 677,436 1,150,654 4,864,519 431,571 1,113,023 1,129,769 23,226 75,132 644,929 102 190,578 40311 11,396,982 6,0.95,954 5,381,058 9,253,813 287,814 1,656,952 3,348,211 100,000 874,152 16,281 2,033,361 6,335,579 20,585 79,060 327,088 300,000 10,000 4414254 $ 19,80.3,337 $ 3,586,038 4,349,439 37,563 649,549 1,747,711 722,712 626,990 2,528,540 378,822 427,496 29,727 131,734 11,789 48,049 237,613 214,007 222,813 31,233 398,094 71,255 1,545,075 59,942 259,148 30 352 18,345,690. 102,517 172,677 276,851 595,226 490,347 1,ISO,866 5,246,700 531,195 1,121,949 1,099,086 46,536 121,420 15,435 555,480 102 212,588 68 020 11,80.6,995 6,538,695 7,230,373 11,425,326 259,705 1,515,485 4,020,277 100,000 1,829,SO7 26,357 2,038,321 4,971,288 12,966 79,682 353,736 300,000 10,000 4877074 20.,394,399 $ ATTACHMENT A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES OPERATING FUNDS Through May 2004 1999 - 20.04 ,io:oi 20.,817,900. $ 3,720,282 4,438,568 57,280 703,533 1,293,462 609,953 962,931 2,896,612 449,514 440,482 42,476 142,557 848 45,066 280,647 244,523 245,513 35,177 446,225 198,461 1,532,760 63,304 280,346 31623 19,162,141 132,752 268,828 451,546 682,057 471,255 1,189,852 5,543,652 478,753 1,153,938 1,102,440 65,867 149,481 10,763 595,668 18,578 222,570 72882 12,610.,882 8,551,259 5,739,885 9,831,358 240,300 1,678,341 2,862,495 100,000 473,838 36,741 332,424 9,510,421 27,952 62,933 509,798 300,000 10,000 7132442 23277,686 $ 20.0.2.. 22,799,494 $ 3,720,282 4,486,718 38,065 660,501 1,341,267 956,651 955,158 2,944,627 410,061 654,511 27,039 139,673 28,585 45,066 280,647 244,523 245,513 35,177 446,225 198,461 1,532,760 63,304 280,346 31623 19,766,783 179,533 263,517 501,397 697,645 490,892 1,206,420 5,819,518 404,950 1,139,089 1,303,178 70,236 123,636 44,796 736,100 2,210,913 173,727 61 110 15,446,657 4,320.,126 4,437,536 7,864,987 275,526 1,891,685 4,305,470 100,000 277,103 44,992 6,189,022 (4,129) 71,568 521,638 300,000 10,000 9709294 23,692,169 $ If1 :2m:: 24,598,825 $ 4,116,663 4,363,413 55,475 654,148 1,157,051 1,165,437 833,284 3,051,044 531,851 475,721 94,410 166,547 20,465 39,295 323,259 255,438 221,901 39,871 174,315 219,413 1,661,266 95,381 245,834 53247 20.,0.14,928 180,428 273,278 580,419 718,859 389,554 1,286,327 6,348,620 379,906 1,280,064 1,212,402 200,561 110,231 8,037 752,271 23,729 217,556 73418 14,0.35,660. 5,979,268 10,959,043 13,553,040 197,361 1,821,173 551,846 100,000 817,348 55,336 14,215,777 4,438 66,453 532,109 300,000 10,000 9312254 27,984,0.95 $ Mav 2004 Monthlv Financial Report " , '. 20.04. Rovjs&d Budnet . """ 'Tliròùgh : AnnUal: .',Mav. 13,315,189 $ 8,107,771 10,635,153 134,000 1,714,051 2,810,601 1,900,000 1,850,000 7,253,021 1,183,975 1,194,009 377,296 142,100 653,062 934,950 SOO,250 76,601 632,180 542,000 3,437,136 168,545 883,914 111349 45,441,964 288,288 757,905 1,349,066 2,043,473 1,427,447 3,887,059 15,919,130 1,384,060 4,042,762 4,031,639 1,270,632 367,661 350,999 2,480,447 5,069,631 SOl ,630 179177 45,351,0.0.6 90.,958 8,539,315 17,153,703 83,535 1,000,000 837,186 100,000 214,656 70,531 2,367,857 10,124 376,626 300,000 10,000 1578756 4,791,759 $ 4,188,038 4,529,871 47,041 699,925 1,413,909 660,368 795,548 3,330,109 532,554 493,978 32,289 169,994 5,926 52,813 312,584 362,429 223,233 29,561 335,858 225,623 1,834,690 98,318 333,229 41784 20.,749,671 190,660 314,985 582,473 812,440 595,545 1,535,878 6,448,241 477,579 1,464,726 1,409,532 211,805 140,805 56,730 927,198 299,006 203,918 67054 15,738,575 5,0.11,0.96 4,SO4,788 10,526,416 ActlJals' . 'through: , May.. ,','.',.'.,varfanco'.'.'. ' ::~~~':;'bi~io¡,fa~~;ablè)' . 'Oolllir$!Sj:" . :Nri:èòqy,j: $ 24,588,80.0. $ 4,188,038 4,332,920 49,635 659,652 1,114,997 894,959 590,117 3,456,059 SOO,I84 612,386 32,289 128,331 5,926 44,321 326,376 31,890 373,631 215,674 36,637 88,238 225,623 1,834,690 96,281 595,397 36188 20.,470.,438 189,383 298,029 563,879 748,094 SO3,766 1,461,326 6,338,906 347,395 1,424,749 1,397,537 211,805 126,624 56,730 937,812 299,006 200,777 80232 15,186,0.51 5,284,387 4,SO4,788 10,526,416 215,729 1,696,166 100,000 1,630,021 3,732 - $ 4,145,776 (7,337) 84,409 363,641 300,000 10,000 15329422 23,851,559 $ 24,588,80.0. (196,951) 2,594 (40,274) (298,912) 234,591 (205,431) 125,951 (32,370) 118,408 (41,663) (8,492) 13,791 31,890 11,202 (7,559) 7,076 (247,620) (2,037) 262,169 15596 (279,234) 1,277 16,956 18,594 64,346 91,779 74,552 109,335 130,185 39,976 11,995 14,181 (10,614) 3,140 113178 552,525 273,291 n/a rva n/a n/a rva n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 24,862,0.91 n/a 0.0% -4.3% 5.5% -5.8% -21.1% 35.5% -25.8% 3.8% -6.1% 24.0% 0.0% -24.5% 0,0% -16.1% 4.4% nla 3.1% -3.4% 23,9% -73,7% 0,0% 0.0% -2,1% 78.7% -13.4% -1,3% 0.7% 5.4% 3,2% 7.9% 15.4% 4,9% 1.7% 27,3% 2.7% 0.9% 0,0% 10.1% 0.0% -1,1% 0,0% 1,5% -19.7% 3,5% 5,5% 0.0% 0,0% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nla nla n/a nla n/a nla nla 1[(dj MEETING DATE: July 20,2004 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Compensation Study CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ¡g¡ CONSENT D RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0 $0 $0.00 ATTACHMENTS: Memo to Finance/Economic Development/Regional Affairs Committee. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: At the January 2004 City Council Retreat, Council members asked staff to identify the resources required to conduct a compensation study to determine where City wages fall relative to the market. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Move to full Council to not conduct a study and continue practice of spot checks on as-needed basis. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of Council Committee recommendation to not conduct a study and continue practice of spot checks on as-needed basis. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ ,.,,::i~{\^1\. V r ~ '\ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 City of Federal Way MEMORANDUM Date: June 3, 2004 To: Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee David M~Manager . ( V' - ,~~'\~~ Mary McDougal, Human Resources Manager \ ~- , Via: From: Subject: Compensation Study Background At the City Council Retreat in January 2004, Council Members requested clarification about the perfonnance pay element of the pay plan, and were infonned that the range maximum used for salary comparisons includes perfonnance pay, In other words, in order to be paid at the market rate set by Council, an employee needs to achieve 100% of the possible perfonnance pay available each year. Council was also interested in where our compensation stands in comparison with the market. Because the City has not conducted a comprehensive compensation study on non-represented employees but has relied on "spot checks" as needed, we dQl1't know where our salaries fall overall relative to the market. Bargaining unit positions are surveyed and negotiated through the collective bargaining process ever three years, and are targeted at the market average. Council then asked staff to identify the resources that would be required to conduct a comprehensive compensation study, and to report back to Council with the infonnation by mid-year. Process and Resources Required A comprehensive compensation study generally cover two elements: a market based compensation comparison and an internal equity analysis based on job duties and responsibilities. The first element is the compensation study and the second element is known as the classification study. Both elements are important in insuring a compensation structure is both competitive and fair. The compensation study typically involves a review of city pay structure, selection of benchmark positions, and survey of the prevailing market salaries and wages for these benchmark positions to detennine relative market placement ofthe City's compensation structure. All un-surveyed positions will be placed based on their relation to the GI benchmark positions. The classification study typically involves a detailed analysis of City positions - review of job descriptions vs. tasks actually being performed, and review of relative skill requirements and responsibility levels to establish the basis of internal equity for positions within a department and across departments. While both elements involve consultant assistance and require staff time to support the process, the classification/internal equity piece will involve employees in various departments and positions over a period up to six months. This demand on stafftime would be hard to meet with current workloads during 2004. The consultant cost for compensation study is between $15,000 to $25,000, and a complete classification and compensation study runs between $75,000 to $100,000. The most costly part of a compensation study, however, is not the study itself but the cost of implementing the study results. It is customary that a new compensation plan is implemented by "red-lining" or "freezing" salaries that are above the market until the market catches up, while those salaries below the market are adjusted to the market. Therefore, any salary savings will be realized over time while the additional costs to bring those salaries below the market to the target level starts immediately. Because the cost of implementation can be substantial, implementation of study results is sometimes delayed, or results are partially implemented, or not implemented at all. Options 1. Scope of Study: a. Do not conducts a study and continue practice of spot checks on as needed basis; or b. Conduct a comprehensive classification and compensation study to check both internal alignment and market placement; or c. Conduct a compensation study only to determine where salaries fall relative to the target market placement. 2. Timing: If the council decides to conduct a compensation study, the timing should also be considered. a. Conduct the study in 2004 so results/cost of implementation is known for 2005/2006 biennial budget. b. Conduct the study in 2005. Pros/Cons la. Continuing the current practice has minimal impact on budget and staff resources. The negative is that the question of where the City's wages stands related to the market remains unanswered. lb. Conducting a full classification and compensation study provide assurances that job descriptions are up to date and positions and salaries are aligned both internally and externally, and efficiencies are gained by joining the two activities. C::>Z- 2a. 2b. However, the cost to conduct the study and implementation ofthe results could be significant, and the results may not be implemented in the near future due to the budget limitations. lc. Limiting the scope to a study of City salaries compared to the external market reduces the cost and staffing resources required, and will answer the question initially raised by Council of whether we have maintained salaries at the 60th percentile of the market. However, a pure market driven compensation structure can create disparity internally and result in unintended morale issue. Conducting the study in 2004 would answer the Council's question about the placement of City salaries relative to the market this year and allow the cost of implementation to be included in 05/06 budget. On the negative side, the cost of the study is currently not included in the budget, and it is an additional work plan item for city staff among regular workload and many other projects and priorities. Conducting the study in 2005 will allow the cost of the study to be included in the 200512006 biennial budget, and the workload to be included in departments' 05/06 work plan. On the other hand, it further delays an answer to the Council question of where City salaries are currently in relation to the market and a competitive structure for recruiting best employees. Committee Action Recommended . Forward selected scope option ~ and timing option - to the full City Council for approval. :pp~ov ~¡Z~MMII.r!-~¡ "Ç'tJ,.... ii, ----- . . Chair (;3 MEETING DATE: Jtl\\} W, 'wc4 ITEM#T Le) - CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan CATEGORY: !É CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS BUDGET IMP ACT: [8J ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0 $0 $0 .......,...--..-,..".,-....... ........-....."................ A TT ACHMENTS: Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan Adopting Ordinance and Exhibits. ..............,...............,.............,......................, ....,.................,.,........ SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: As a chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan establishes pre-annexation Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations, and general policies regarding land use, transportation, environment, capital facilities, public services, annexation and other issues. As required by state law, two public hearings have been held to gather and consider public input. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On May 3,2004 and May 24,2004 the LUTC reviewed and recommended the Final Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan be approved as proposed with the following recommendations regarding four site specific zoning requests: Apply the Community Business Comprehensive Plan classification and BC zoning with companion Comprehensive Plan text amendment and development agreement (at time of annexation) to the Jackson property (adjacent to northbound 1-5 freeway on-ramps on the north side of S. 320th Street). Apply the Neighborhood Business Comprehensive Plan classification and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning to the Davis site located at 30682 Military Rd. S. Apply the Single Family High Density Comprehensive Plan classification and RS9.6 zoning (9,600 square foot lot sizes) to the North Lake frontage lots on the east side of North Lake. Apply the Neighborhood Business Comprehensive Plan classification and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning to the Rabie site located south of288th St. S. and east ofI-5. ......,_..,.............,_.,...._,........ .......".,_...._,_....... PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the 1st reading of the ordinance and to direct staff to schedule a 2nd reading of the ordinance on July 20, 2004, adopting the proposed Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan as recommended by the LUTC." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ....................--...............-............................................... ~\ ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION ~ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) R~~ ~t?JMJ{)' ~ COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # 3'fö DR AFT (ì/2- 7/Ó f ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER EIGHT "POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SUBAREA PLAN" OF THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AMENDING CHAPTER TWO "LAND USE", AMENDING CHAPTER FOUR "ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT" AND REPEALING THE EXISTING CHAPTER EIGHT "POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREAS." WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Chapter 36.70A RCW or "GMA") requires the City of Federal Way to adopt a Comprehensive Plan which includes a land use element (inclùding a land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities element, and transportation element (including transportation system map[s]); and WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations implementing its Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its Comprehensive Plan with land use map (the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the Comprehensive Plan, land use map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998, September 14,2000, and November 1,2001 and March 27,2003; and WHEREAS, under RCW 36.70A130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to continuing review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than once per year; and WHEREAS, the Council shall be considering three separate actions to amend the Comprehensive Plan, all of which will be acted upon simultaneously in order to comply with RCW 36.70AI30; and WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 04-_, a change in Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM 3600) and associated development agreement and development plan for 46.58 acres located south of S. 336th Street ORD# , PAGE 1 between Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5 pertaining to the Christian Faith Center proposed development; and WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 04- , a request from the Quadrant Corporation to remove the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the Comprehensive Plan and to delete this project from Table III-I 9 (Regional CIP Project List); and WHEREAS, these actions include the adoption of a PotentÜil Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan, which will replace Chapter 8, "Potential Annexation Areas" of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and address certain Comprehensive Plan text changes in Chapter 2, "Land Use" and Chapter 4, "Economic Development" pertaining to the Community Business (Be) Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning classification; and WHEREAS, the last of these actions, adoption of a P AA Subarea Plan and associated text changes to the "Land Use" and "Economic Development" Chapters of the Comprehensive Plan, is the subject of this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, in conjunction with neighboring jurisdictions has adopted P AA boundaries; and WHEREAS, the GMA encourages the annexation of urban and urbanizing areas within P AAs where urban level facilities and services can be provided; and WHEREAS, the GMA, State annexation law, County-Wide Planning Policies of King County, King County Comprehensive Plan, and Federal Way Comprehensive Plan encourage cities to prepare in advance a comprehensive subarea land use plan that will become effective if and when the P AAs are annexed pursuant to Chapter 35.13 RCW; and WHEREAS, King County partially funded and actively participated in research and preparation of the proposed Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments; and ORD# , PAGE 2 WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan text and maps reflect and incorporate new and expanded information pertaining to the P AA including, but not limited to, Comprehensive Plan designations; zoning classifications; policies regarding land use; transportation; environment; parks; housing; capital facilities; and public service: as well as fiscal impacts associated with annexation; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.13.177 authorizes the City to adopt pre-annexation Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning classifications as a component of the Comprehensive Plan, including adoption of Comprehensive Plan and zoning maps, provided the designations shall not be amended within one year of adoption; and WHEREAS, the City may consider Comprehensive Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Article IX, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC); and WHEREAS, four individual property owners submitted requests for certain P AA Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning classifications; and WHEREAS, the four individual requests described above are incorporated into the proposed P AA Subarea Plan Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments addressed in this ordinance (collectively "Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments"); and WHEREAS, the Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments include proposed modifications to the BC zone locational criteria in the Land Use and Economic Development chapters of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on February 18,2004, the City SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non Significance on the Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS, the Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments are consistent with all of the goals and requirements set forth in the GMA, which encourages annexation planning; and WHEREAS, the City, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council Committees, and full City Council, received, discussed, and considered public testimony and written comments, and materials ORD# , PAGE 3 regarding the Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments, resulting from the following public outreach and public hearings: 1. Three public meetings with homeowner's associations; 2. Three public open houses within the P AA and the City; 3. A City Planning Commission public meeting held March 3, 2004; 4. City Planning Commission public hearings held on March 17, 2004, April 7,2004 and April 21, 2004, following which it recommended adoption of the Plan text and map amendments with three modifications; 5. City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee public meetings on May 3, 2004 and May 24, 2004 following which it recommended adoption of the Plan text and map amendments with four modifications; and 6. Two City Council public hearings on June 1,2004 and July 6,2004, as required by RCW 35A.14.340; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments as recommended by the Land Use and Transportation Committee. Now, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings. The Proposed P AA Subarea Plan Amendments reflect new or updated information developed since the initial adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, and are specifically related to the City's Potential Annexation Area. They bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; are in the best interest of the residents of the City; and are consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW, the King County County-Wide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Section 2. Com~rehensive Plan Amendments Adoption. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, 2001 and 2003, including its Land Use ORD# , PAGE 4 element map, copies of which are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby are and shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A (Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan), B (Amended Land Use Chapter) and C (Amended Economic Development Chapter) attached hereto. Copies of Exhibits A, Band C are on file with the Office of the City Clerk and are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 3. Amendment Authority. The adoption of Plan amendments in Section 2 above is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541. Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and 1996 Zoning Map, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, and 2001, shall remain in force and effect until the amendments thereto become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance. Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ,2004. day of ORD# , PAGE 5 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Mayor, Dean McColgan ATTEST: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE No: ORD# , PAGE 6 EXHJBIT A - - Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Subarea Plan Proposed Final December 2003 . ' ',', ", " , '",," '0' ' , " . ,'" . , ' 0' "', ,'0' ' ,'" 0' 00. :~,:, ", " :,,' ,°,; , " ' ... ~ " ' ' ,~~,~':, "'" ,::~,~r~~~~~~;:~l -,../ . t_-_. ~ """ = _° "t'8 ¡~.., '°, l.~-;' -,.,,:.;-,' - ..-, . ""__sri':' -":;--',:.>....,,'~..'~."'.'-..' . -.' --'- ~ CITY OF 4fIII' ~ Federal Way CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Federal Wav Otv Council: Jeanne Burbidge (Mayor) Jack Dovey Eric Faison Mary Gates Linda Kochmar Dean McColgan (Deputy Mayor) Mike Park Federal Wav Planning Commission: John Caulfield (Chair) William Drake Dini Duclos Hope Elder (Vice Chair) Marta Justus Foldi David Osaki Grant Newport Christine Nelson (Alternate #\) Tony Moore (Alternate #2) Merle Pfeifer (Alternate #3) Lawson Bronson (Alternate #4) Potential Annexation Area Steering Committee: Hope Elder, Federal Way Planning Commission William Drake, Federal Way Planning Commission Eric Faison, Federal Way City Council Linda Kochmar, Federal Way City Council Lois Kutscha, Resident Representative Thomas Murphy, Federal Way Chamber of Commerce Gail Pearson, Resident Representative Paul Reitenbach, King County, DDES Ed Stewart, Commissioner, Lakehaven Utility District Bev Twiddle, Commissioner, Lakehaven Utility District Geri Walker, Federal Way School District Potential Annexation Area StajT Work Group Representatives of the following Agency Departments and Divisions have participated: Citv of Federal Way Community Development Serviccs- Planning Division City Manager's Office Management Services-Finance Division Management Services-GIS Division Parks and Recreation Department Public Safety Department Public Works-Solid Waste Division Public Works-Surface Water Management Division Public Works-Transportation Division Other Agencies: Federal Way Fire Department Highline Utility District King County DDES Lakehaven Utility District Puget Sound Energy Agency Report Preparation Team: Consultant Report Preparation Team: City of Federal Way, Department of Community Development Services, Project Management City Federal Way, GIS Division, GIS Mapping Services King County, DDES, Data Coordination Jones & Stokes, Project Management ECONorthwest Henderson, Young and Company Mirai Associates Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. December 2003 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Subarea Plan ..........................................,.,...".............."..................",..,........., I PAA Location and General Characteristics """.""""""""'..""""""""""""""""""""'" I Subarea Plan Relationship to Other Elements ."""""""""."""""""""."""'...........,.".... 2 Subarea Planning Process and Concepts '..""""""""""""".""""""'.""""""""""'."""'. 2 Public Input Process .....,....,...........,...........,......,....,.........................,....,..,......,..................3 POLICY BACKGROUND...........,...........................................................................5 2.1 Statewide Planning Goals................................................................,.................,....,..........5 2.2 Countywide Planning Policies """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""..........6 2.3 City Planning Goals or Policies ...................................................................................,....8 2.4 Consistency of Subarea Plan with Key State, Countywide, and Local Planning Goals 8 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA................................... 9 Federal Way PAA Boundary ......................................................................,............,.,......9 Accomplishments since 1991 Issue Paper...................................................................... 10 Feasibility Analysis.. ............. ............. .... .... ....... ........ ........ ............... ....... .......... 11 Annexation Feasibility Analysis Purpose....................................................................... II Study Area Population...................,.................................................................................13 Feasibility Study Methodology... ......... .....,.. ............. .,.. .... .......... ......... ..... ..,.. ...... ........... 14 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................. 15 Summary of Inventory..................... .......... ..................... .............. ...............,....... ............ 15 Environmental Goals and Policies...... ......". ........ ......". ...... ....... ..... ............. ......... .......... 18 LAND USE ............................................................................................".............. 19 Existing Land Uses ......................................................................,................................... 19 Land Use Plan ......,......................................................,....................................................21 Land Use Goals and Policies...........................................................................................25 HOUSING ...........................................................................................................26 Summary of Inventory....,....... ......... ....................... ....".. .............,..... ...... .... ."......, ..........26 Housing Goals and Policies.............................................................................................28 PARKS AND RECREATION .................................................................................29 Summary of Parks Planning Efforts and Inventory ....................................,.................. 29 Future Parks and Recreation Needs ............................... ............., ..... ...... ..... ...... ..........." 30 Parks & Recreation Goals and Policies ..........................................................................33 SURF ACE WATER... ....... ..... ........... ....... ...... ...... ....... ..... ......... ..... .......... ..... ........., 34 Summary of Inventory.......... .....,............. ..."....... ...... ..,. ....... ......... .... ......... ..". .......... ...." 34 Future Surface Water Needs .....,.....................................................................................37 Surface Water Goals and Policies ............................................. ................. ............. ........41 TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................................42 10.1 Summary of Inventory ...............".................................................................................." 42 1 0.2 Existing and Future Transportation Levels of Service ..................................................43 10.3 Transportation Goals and Policies ..................................................................................49 P RIV ATE UTI LITI ES ........, ................... ........ ........ .......".. .......... ,.... .......... ......... ....., 51 l.l 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 7.1 7.2 8.1 8.2 8.3 9.1 9.2 9.3 ii December 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 12 11,1 Summary ofPAA Inventory """"",,""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'" 51 11.2 Private Utilities Goals and Policies ................................................................................52 PUBLIC SERVICES AND CAPITAL FACILITIES .....................................................53 12.1 Inventory of Public Services Likely to Change as a Result of Annexation ................. 53 12,2 Summary of Fiscal Impacts and Strategies """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 55 12,3 Services Unlikely to Change as a Result of Annexation:.............................................. 61 12.4 Public Services and Capital Facilities Goals and Policies ....................................,.......64 PUB LlC P ARTI C I P A TI 0 N................. ....................... """"""""'" """""""""" ...... 66 13.1 Public Participation Goal and Policies ...........,.................................,...................,.........66 GOVERNANCE AND INTER-JURISDICTIONAL COORDINATION...................... 67 14,1 Governance/Interjurisdictional Goals and Policies.............. """""" ........... ........ ....... .... 67 AN N EXA TI ON oo. .oo. .oo. .oo............oooooo......oo...oo ""'" oo..oooo.oooo.oo..oo................oo OOOO""" 68 15.1 Annexation Goals and Policies ............. ...... ........... ...... ......... """"""". """"""" ............. 69 TECHNICAL REFERENCES TO THE SUBAREA PLAN 'OOOOOO'OO"'OO"OO'OOOOOO"'oo..'OOOOOOOOOO 72 13 14 15 16 List of Tables Table I Year 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2020 Population and Housing """""""""""""""""""" 13 Table 2 Existing Land Use by Parcel.......................................................................................... 19 Table 3 P AA Housing Sales and Affordability """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""."""'" 28 Table 4 P AA Park Facilities Owned by King County............................................................... 29 Table 5 P AA and City Parks Levels of Service .........................................................................30 Table 6 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Cost for Parks and Recreation....... 31 Table 7 In-Road Surface Water Facilities...................................................................................35 Table 8 Regional Stormwater Facilities ..... ..". ...... ..... """""""" .................. ..... ....... ...... ............. 35 Table 9 Residential and Commercial Drainage Facilities.......................................................... 35 Table 10 Road Maintenance Problems in PAA.......................................................................... 37 Table II Road Maintenance Problems Near P AA.... .................................................................37 Table 12 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Cost for Surface Water Capital Improvements...........................................""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"..............40 Table 13 Street Inventory within P AA """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'" 43 Table 14 Future LOS and Recommended Improvements .........................................................45 Table 15 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Cost for Roadway Improvements..............................................""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"...........47 Table 16 Operating Revenues Generated, by P AA (2003)........................................................56 Table 17 Operating Costs by Department by Potential Annexation Area (2003) .................... 57 Table 18 Annual Net Operating Revenues (or Operating Cost) of Annexation, by P AA (2003).............................................................................................................................57 Table 19 Federal Way Potential Annexation'Area Capital Revenue to 2020..........................57 Table 20 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Estimated Future Capital Costs................ 58 Table 21 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Estimated Net Capital Revenues.............. 58 iii December 2003 List of Maps Each Map follows after Page 72: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Map I Federal Way PAA Map II Community Level Subarea Boundaries Map III Sensitive Areas Map IV Geologic Hazards Figure V 2002 Existing Land Use Distribution Map VI Parks & Cultural Resources Map VII-I Federal Way P AA Pre-Annexation Comprehenisve Plan Designations Map VII-2 Federal Way PAA Pre-Annexation Zoning Map Map VIII Surface Water Facilities Map IX Arterials and Local Streets Map X Existing Roadway Level of Service Map XI Year 2020 Roadway Level of Service Map XII 20 Year Proposed Intersection Improvements Map XIII Fire Department Facilities Map XIV Public School Facilities Map XV Water Service Map XVI Wastewater Service, Septic Repair and Complaints iv December 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 P.urpose of Subarea Plan The City of Federal Way Potential Annexation Area (P AA) was established through a series of interlocal agreements between the City of Federal Way and neighboring south King County cities. Based upon the State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) and King County Countywide Planning Policies, the City would ultimately annex and provide services within its designated P AA. While the City's Comprehensive Plan focuses upon plans and policies for property in the City limits, this Subarea Plan augments the Comprehensive Plan and addresses in more detail the Federal Way PAA, located principally to the east of 1-5, with a small portion located west of 1-5 and north of the City limits near the Redondo neighborhood. Over time, property owners in the P AA have made annexation requests to the City of Federal Way, which requires a thorough City analysis of service/capital expenditures, revenues, and other issues. To review its P AA comprehensively and in advance of individual requests, the City of Federal Way, with the support of King County, initiated a PAA Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study of which this PAA Subarea Plan is a part. By evaluating the feasibility of potential annexations and planning for the future delivery of services, residents of the P AA and the City can make more informed choices about their future. Specific Subarea Plan purposes include: . To act as an informational resource for the City and County staff, elected officials, residents, property owners, and business owners; . To identify the P AA-specific goals, policies, pre-annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designations and capital plans; and To provide the City with a framework to guide future annexations. . In coordination with the City's overall Comprehensive Plan, this PAA Subarea Plan provides a Year 2020 long-range land use and policy plan to guide pre- annexation planning efforts and annexation requests. 1.2 P AA Location and General Characteristics The Federal Way PAA is located in South King County, and, with the exception of a small future annexation area near the intersection of South 272nd Street and Pacific Highway South (SR 99), lies generally east of the City of Federal Way and Interstate 5. The P AA is characterized by a series of residential neighborhoods focused around numerous lakes beginning with Star Lake at the north and concluding with Five Mile Lake at the South. See Maps I and II. December 2003 1.3 1.4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Subarea Plan Relationship to Other Elements The GMA requires that the City of Federal Way prepare a 20-year comprehensive plan that at a minimum addresses land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, transportation, economic development, and parks and recreation, Optionally, a city or county may choose to include subarea plans and/or other elements, GMA does not limit optional topics, Since its adoptioI1in 1995, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan has included policies identifying the need for comprehensive land planning in its designated P AA, The City's Comprehensive Plan was prepared in accordance with the GMA and underwent an extensive public participation process including City residents, property owners, and business owners as documented in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Introduction. The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan in its entirety contains ten elements: Land Use, Transportation, Economic Development, Housing, Capital Facilities, City Center, Potential Annexation Area, Natural Environment, and Private Utilities. The Consolidated Plan for Housing and Human Services, and the Parks Recreation and Cultural Services Plan are incorporated by reference. When adopted in final form, this P AA Subarea Plan will be a component of the overall Federal Way Comprehensive Plan focusing upon the 5,OOO-acre future annexation area, and will replace the Potential Annexation Area Element of the Comprehensive Plan currently in place, It is intended that the City's Comprehensive Plan Elements provide the general goals and policies for land use, transportation, economic development, etc. for the P AA as well as the City. However, the P AA Subarea Plan is intended to address unique characteristics or situations relevant to the P AA. Future annexation proposals will be evaluated, and, if approved, implemented in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, that will include the PAA Subarea Plan, Subarea Planning Process and Concepts This P AA Subarea Plan has been prepared in accordance with an established work program that included reviews by the City of Federal Way, King County, and two working committees. The work program has included public participation throughout the process. The key steps in this planning process include: . Inventory: The inventory identifies current environmental and public service conditions. See Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18,2002. Analysis: Several analyses have been undertaken including land use and population review, levels of service (roads, surface water, police, etc.), and preliminary cost and revenue estimates. (Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level (~rService Analysis, July 1 I, 2003; Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Land Use Analysis Compilation, March 5, 2003.) . 2 December 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . Draft Plan: The March 2003 Draft P AA Subarea Plan contained draft policies and plans, and was the basis for a fiscal analysis. Final Plan: Based on public input and the fiscal review of the Draft Plan, the Final Subarea Plan has been prepared. It is coordinated with the PAA Annexation Few,.ibility Study including strategic alternatives such as annexation area phasing and service provision phasing, ~dopted Plan: As part of the City's public hearing process, the Federal Way Planning Commission will review and makè a recommendation to the Federal Way City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee (LUTe) regarding the adoption of the Subarea Plan. The LUTC will review the Subarea Plan and the Planning Commission recommendation and issue a recommendation to the Federal Way City Council regarding the adoption of the Subarea Plan. The City Council will review the Subarea Plan and the Planning Commission and LUTC recomrnendations in its consideràtion of adopting the Subarea Plan. . . As the PAA Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study have progressed to date, key concepts have been elicited about the P AA: . The City of Federal Way recognizes annexation as a citizen-based process. The Federal Way PAA Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study are intended to provide for advanced planning of the PAA allowing both citizens and the City to make informed choices about their future. The PAA is part of the larger Federal Way community, but is distinct in its own right. Given its proximity, inter-dependent transportation network, shared school district/utility districts/emergency service providers, and the City's subregional economic role, the P AA is inter-related with the City of Federal Way. However, the P AA has its own unique characteristics - residential neighborhood variety, natural features including headwaters to several significant streams, a road system functioning with rural standards in an urbanizing area, some economic nodes such as in Redondo, and many other distinct features. . 1.5 Public Input Process Key to the development of the PAA Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study has been and will be public participation. Public participation methods for the PAA Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study have included: . Articles for inclusion in City and Utility District newsletters, and City and County website pages sites (www.cityoffederalway.com; www.metrokc.gov, respectively), as well as a link from the Federal Way School District website page to City and County website. December 2003 3 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . Creation ofa PAA Study webpage on the City's website that provides an opportunity for residents, property owners, and business owners to view draft and final work products, provide comments and suggestions, as well as other features, . Coordination of draft work products with neighboring jurisdictions and ,- affected agencies, . City facilitation of public neighborhood meetings with the North Lake, Lake Kilarney, and lake Geneva Homeowner's Associations to explain the purposes of the P AA Study and its scope of work, . City-issued press releases announcing the publication of draft work products and the hosting of public meetings. . The maintenance of a comprehensive stakeholder list that is used for mailing public meeting announcements and the announcement of the issuance of recently issued draft work products. . The mailing of the City's quarterly newsletter to each P AA household. Each newsletter provides an update regarding the status of the P AA study and the announcement of recently issued draft work products. Announcement of the publication of draft work products and hosting of public meetings on the City's public access television station. P AA Steering Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council regular meetings open to the public. To date, Steering Committee Meetings have been held in December 2001, January and February 2002, and January and April 2003, and more are planned. Planning Commission and City Council meetings are forthcoming. . . . Public open houses where residents, property owners, and business owners can review infonnation of interest relevant to their neighborhood, and talk individually with officials and staff. To date public open houses have been held in February 2002, and January and September 2003, Meetings were held at local public schools in the PAA and at the City of Federal Way City Hall. At the meetings, the public could review the P AA inventory, land use concepts, levels of service and fiscal analyses as well as provide comments and ask questions. Later in the process, public hearings before the PlalU1Ìng Commission and/or City Council to present formal testimony, including written comments in advance of the public hearings. . A Steering Committee was formed to act as a "sounding board" reviewing products of the Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study, and assessing the direction of the project, particularly the Subarea Plan. The P AA Steering Committee consists of officials from the Federal Way City Council, Planning Commission, School District, Chamber of Commerce, King County, Lakehaven Utility District, and P AA Resident representatives. December 2003 4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan A Staff Work Group comprised of City staff from multiple departments, a County staff representative, Utility District representatives, and Fire District staff provided technical review of P AA Subarea Plan products and furnished data and information to the Subarea Plan preparation team. 2 POLICY BACKGROUND 2.1 statewide Planning Goals The GMA contains 13 statewide planning goals addressing: . Urban growth . Natural resource industries . Reduce sprawl . Open space and recreation . Transportation . Environment . Housing . Citizen participation and . Economic development coordination . Public facilities and services . Property rights . Historic preservation . Permits While all have been considered in the Subarea Planning process, three in particular are most relevant to P AA planning efforts: . Urban growth - Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist, or can be provided in an efficient manner. Reduce sprawl - Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development. Public facilities and services - Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use, without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. In terms of urban growth and reduction of sprawl, the P AA contains primarily single-family development, with a few commercial nodes along major arterial roadways, where services are or can be extended, identified as neighborhood or community centers. The land use/zoning pattern based on the Pre-Annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations would result in urban densities of about 4 units per net acre or greater, meeting GMA goals for urban level growth. Select areas have Pre-Annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designations to accommodate approximately I residential unit per acre on the periphery of the . . December 2003 5 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan P AA, due to sensitive areas and infrastmcture limitations. The ability of the City and Special Districts to provide public facilities and services to the P AA is another key topic of this Subarea Plan, The principles contained in the Subarea Plan are to meet community service and infrastmcture needs cõnculTent with growth, to conduct additional capital planning in areas where data gaps have been found (e.g. surface water), and to provide public services in a cost-efficient manner recognizing the historic level of service differences between the City and the County.. 2.2 Countywide Planning Policies In King County, the Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP's) that were enacted pursuant to the GMA also provide guidance with regard to multi-jurisdictional joint planning, annexation, and the phasing of urban development. The most applicable policies are: LU28 LU29 LU30 Within the Urban Growth Area, growth should be directed as follows: a) first, to centers and urbanized areas with existing infrastructure capacity; b) second, to areas which are already urbanized such that infrastructure improvements can be easily extended; and c) last, to areas requiring major infrastructure improvements. All jurisdictions shall develop growth phasing plans consistent with applicable capital facilities plans to maintain an urban area served with adequate public facilities and services to maintain an urban area to meet at least the six year intermediate household and employment target ranges consistent with LU67 and LU68. These growth phasing plans shall be based on locally adopted definitions, service levels, and financing commitments, consistent with State GMA requirements. The phasing for cities shall not extend beyond their Potential Annexation Areas. Interlocal agreements shall be developed that specify the applicable minimum zoning, development standards, impact mitigation, and future annexation for the Potential Annexation Areas. Where urban services cannot be provided within the next 10 years, jurisdictions should develop policies and regulations to: a. Phase and limit development such that planning, siting, densities, and infrastructure decisions will support future urban development when urban services become available. b. Establish a process for converting land to urban densities and uses once services are available. December 2003 6 FW13 LU31 LU32 LU33 LU34 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Cities are the appropriate provider of local urban services to urban areas, either directly or by contract. Counties are the appropriate provider of most countywide services, Urban services shall not be extended through the use of special purpose districts without the approval of the city in whose potential annexation area the extension is proposed. Within the urban area, as time and conditions warrant, cities should assume local urban services provided by special purpose districts. In collaboration with adjacent counties, cities, and King County, and in consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area shall be specific to each city, Potential annexation areas shall not overlap. Within the potential annexation area, the city shall adopt criteria for annexation, including conformance with Countywide Planning Policies, and a schedule for providing urban services and facilities within the potential annexation area. This process shall ensure that unincorporated urban islands of King County are not created between cities and strive to eliminate existing islands between cities. A city may annex territory only within its designated potential annexation area, All cities shall phase annexations to coincide with the ability for the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to be annexed. Land within a city's potential annexation area shall be developed according to that city's and King County's growth phasing plans. Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services. Subsequent to establishing a potential annexation area, in-fill lands within the potential annexation area that are not adjacent, or not practical to annex, shall be developed pursuant to interlocal agreements between the County and the affected city. The interlocal agreement shall establish the type of development allowed in the potential annexation area and standards for that development so that the area is developed in a manner consistent with its future annexation potential. The interlocal agreement shall specify, at a minimum, the applicable zoning, development standards, impact mitigation, and future annexation within the potential annexation area. Several unincorporated areas are currently considering local governance options. Unincorporated urban areas that are already urbanized and are within a city's potential annexation area are encouraged to annex to that city in order to receive urban services. Where annexation is inappropriate, incorporation may be considered. The CWPP's are particularly reflected in Subarea Plan sections 12 and 15, Public Services and Capital Facilities, and Annexation. December 2003 7 2.3 2.4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan City Planning Goals or Policies The Land Use Element of a Comprehensive Plan plays a central role in guiding and directing all other Elements by indicating the desired land use pattern that consequently drives the demand for infrastructure and services. The key City Planning Goals are based then on the City's Land Use Concept in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (see Federal Way Land Use Element, Map II-2), In summary, the City of Federal Way land use concept is based upon creating land use patterns that support multiple modes of transportation, with attention to neighborhood enhancements and protection, and community amenities and needs (design quality; parks; etc.) to ensure compatible land uses. These concepts include the transformation of the City's retail core into a dense, mixed use City Center, preservation of residential neighborhoods, a hierarchy of mixed-use retail and employment nodes to serve the community, and development that recognizes environmentally sensitive areas. The PAA, as part of the larger Federal Way community, is reviewed in this Land Use Concept framework while also reviewed with respect to unique P AA circumstances. Consistency of Subarea Plan with Key State, Countywide, and Local Planning Goals This Subarea Plan has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Washington State GMA, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan to ensure coordinated planning. In summary, the Subarea Plan is consistent with the following State, Regional, and City "indicator" policies: . Growth Management Act: The Subarea Plan applies urban densities to accommodate growth, avoid sprawl, and provide services efficiently within the Urban Growth Area. As described in Section 6, the predominant land classification would support urban level densities except in areas with significant environmental or infrastructure limitations. Public service capital and operational needs and improvements are identified to support the P AA land use plans. . Countywide Planning Policies: The land capacity of the P AA would accommodate the P AA housing target of 1,320 units and employment target of 134 between 2001 and 2022, described further under Section 6.2. Public service capital and operational needs and improvements are identified to support the P AA land use plans, The phasing of services and annexation areas is encouraged in Subarea Plan policies. City Policies: Subarea Plan designations and policies support the Comprehensive Plan such as the hierarchy of Commercial Centers by providing for local-serving commercial and mixed-use nodes, and by supporting the predominant residential character of the P AA. . 8 December 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 3 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA 3.1 Federal Way PAA Boundary Federal Way Adoption of P AA Boundary Process The City of Federal Way formally began the process of evaluating its logical service delivery areas and the boundaries of its P AA with the publication of a July 1991 issue paper. This paper examined the requirements of GMA as they relate to UGA's, and included a discussion of how urban services were being provided. The paper also described special purpose district boundaries, the transportation system, parks and recreation facilities, and physical features that potentially affect urban service delivery. The analysis that was included in the 1991 issue paper provided the basis for a proposed P AA area for the City. Staff presented the issue paper and proposed Urban Growth Boundary to the Federal Way Planning Commission. The Commission reviewed the proposal and held a public hearing. Most of the testimony received by the Commission was supportive of the proposed urban growth boundary. The Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed P AA boundary. The City Council accepted the recommendation, but did not adopt it. Rather, the Council directed staff to begin negotiations with the neighboring cities of Auburn, Milton, Algona, Pacific, Des Moines, and Kent, all of whom had developed urban growth boundaries that overlapped with Federal Way's proposal. The City negotiated with each of its municipal neighbors for the better part of a year. By the Fall of 1993, staff presented a revised P AA boundary to the City Council. The Council reviewed the proposal and adopted the P AA boundary on December 21, 1993. That boundary was amended in 1994. The City executed interlocal agreements with all of the neighboring cities based on the boundary shown on MapI. Neighborhood Analysis levels F or purposes of data collection efficiencies and resources, the P AA has been divided into three Major Subareas as well as seven smaller Community Level Subareas. The Major and Community Level Subareas are as follows (see Map II): . The Redondo East Community Level Subarea is in the Redondo East Major Subarea (both with identical boundaries), west of 1-5 and is approximately 43 acres in size. . Star Lake, Camelot, and North Lake Community Level Subareas comprise the Northeast Major Subarea, east ofI-5 and north of SR-18, and total approximately 2,527 acres in size. December 2003 9 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . Lakeland, Parkway, and Jovita Community Level Subareas comprise the Southeast Major Subarea, east of 1-5 and south of SR-18, and total approximately 2,470 acres in size. The Community Level Subarea Boundaries are shown on Map If. The subarea boundaries are based upon City-defined Transportation Analysis Zones which align with Census Tract geography, neighborhood affinities as expressed in prior County planning efforts, and the ability of the County to provide information within existing resources, as well as input from the P AA Steering Committee in December 2001. 3.2 Accomplishments since 1991 Issue Paper The following has been accomplished since completion of the 1991 Issue Paper: . Used technical information from neighboring jurisdictions and information from affected citizens to identify and establish a P AA boundary for the City of Federal Way. Established an interlocal agreement on mutually agreeable P AA boundaries with the following South King County Cities: Des Moines, Kent, Auburn, Algona, Pacific, and Milton. . . Completed a preliminary analysis of the P AA that identified potential issues associated with annexation and a scope of work for a more comprehensive study of the PAA. Initiated a comprehensive study of the PAA in conjunction with King County. . The comprehensive study of the P AA includes several phases as described above: inventory, analysis, draft and final plan formulation, etc. The Federal Way PAA Inventory (March 18, 2002) addresses a range of environmental, economic, and social conditions within the Federal Way PAA. The Inventory is primarily a compilation ofreadily available data from King County, Special Districts, and the City of Federal Way, and was supplemented with some limited field review. The purpose of the Inventory was to serve as a basis for additional planning and analysis of the P AA including levels of services, current and future fiscal conditions, and subarea planning. The P AA Inventory was followed by a series of reports about levels of service (LOS) in the PAA (Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11,2003). The LOS reports address a wide range of governmental services including community development, human services, parks/recreation, police services, roads, surface water, solid waste, water and wastewater. However, the LOS reports focus upon surface water and transportation in more detail due to the complexity and importance of these services to the community and the City. Also completed was a series ofland use classification and policy December 2003 10 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan analyses analyzing current and proposed land use patterns and policy issues. These recent P AA inventories and analyses are summarized and integrated as appropriate into this Subarea Plan. Additional phases addressing costs and revenues and annexation strategies in the AnnexatÎon Feasibility Study, December 2003, have also been integrated with this P AA Subarea Plan. 4 Feasibility Analysis 4.1 Annexation Feasibility Analysis Purpose An Annexation Feasibility Study (December 2003) has been prepared to estimate the long-term fiscal impact annexation would have on the City of Federal Way. This section provides information on the basic assumptions and methodology of the analysis. The results of the Feasibility Analysis are reviewed in the appropriate topical section of this P AA Subarea Plan (e.g. transportation, surface water, parks and recreation), but are summarized in total in Section 12. As a baseline assessment, the Feasibility Study looks at the net fiscal gap the new, expanded City of Federal Way would face if the City were to annex any of the identified P AAs while trying to maintain current levels of services and current levels of taxation and fees. To account for the differences between the fiscal impacts associated with the day- to-day operation of the City and the impacts associated with needed capital investments, the Feasibility Study takes a three-pronged approach to assessing impacts: 1. Estimate the incremental operating costs introduced by annexation of the P AAs on an annual basis, and compare those costs to the incremental revenues the City would receive from the same areas. 2. Discuss how the balance of operating costs and revenues would be likely to change in future years. 3. Estimate the additional capital investments that the City would take on with annexation and compare those costs to the additional capital revenues the City could expect to receive from the P AAs. To provide the most intuitive and up-to-date information about estimated impacts, this analysis provides a snapshot of what the operating impacts would be if the City were in the position of fully governing each P AA in 2003. The assessment of operating impacts is based on 2003 costs of service and 2003 tax and fee structures, as outlined in the City of Federal Way 2003/2004 Adopted Budget, and is intended to represent a picture of fiscal impacts under steady-state operation. In essence, these estimated steady-state operating impacts reflect the ongoing "costs" December 2003 11 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan that the City would face each year, beginning perhaps, in the third year after annexation and extending into perpetuity.l Estimated costs of capital improvements are based on the most recent available data (2002) and reflect estimates of the combined investments that will be necessary through the planning horizon of 2020 (all presented in 2002 dollars). There is no material effect on this fiscal analysis from using 2003 operating costs impacts and 2002 capital costs, primarily because the capital improvement costs are expressed in current (2002) dollars regardless of when the projects may be built in the next 20 years. The purpose 0 f estimating the hypothetical gap that would be created if the City were to try to extend current service levels to the P AAs without increasing taxes is to present decision makers and the public with a picture of the true "cost" of annexation. Ultimately, any such gap between costs and revenues is hypothetical. Cities have no choice but to cover their costs of operation. Consequently, if Federal Way were to annex any of the P AAs, any estimated "cost" associated with annexation would have to be made up through some combination of (1) stretching City resources through decreased levels of service and/or (2) increasing City revenues. The Feasibility Study Implementation Strategies are integrated into the Subarea Plan Section 12, and examine a variety of options to improve the financial feasibility of future annexations. The Feasibility Study provides fiscal analysis and annexation strategies that are integrated into the Federal Way PAA Subarea Plan, particularly in terms of: . Identifying public services and capital improvements that would need to be in place to serve the Subarea Plan current and future land use pattern over time, and Incorporating into Subarea Plan policies the strategies regarding agency coordination, funding sources, future land use amendments, levels of service, and others, that could improve the financial feasibility of annexations in the PAA. . 1 In the initial years of annexation costs could be either higher or lower than the estimated steady- state impacts, depending on how the City chose to manage annexation. Among the determinants of transition-period costs will be the direct and indirect costs of managing the transition and the pace at which the City chooses to ramp up certain, discretionary service levels in the annexed area. December 2003 12 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 4.2 study Area Population Population data for the Annexation Feasibility Study covers several time periods. The data is consistent among time periods, but different periods are used in order to produce the most accurate forecast of operating and capital costs and revenues. Baseline data was developed from the last US Census and other sources that used the US Census. This enabled the study to start from a reliable base of data for the year 2000. The Operating Cost/Revenue analysis is a snapshot in time based on the City's 2003 budget and rates, with some trend analysis. As a result, population forecasts for 2003 were prepared for use in the analysis of operations. The Capital Cost/Revenue analysis covers the period 2002 through 2020 in order to provide a long-range forecast similar to other long-range planning strategies for capital. The data to support the capital improvements analysis is based on the City's PAA market population and employment forecast from 2000 to 2020. Table 1 shows the population and housing units for each Major Subarea and the total P AA for the years 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2020. The area included in this fiscal analysis comprises a substantial population equal to approximately 25 percent of the 2002 population of the current City of Federal Way (83,850, 2002). Table 1. Year 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2020 Population and Housing 2000 2000 2002 2002 2003 2003 2020 2020 Subarea Population Housing Population Housing Population Housing Population Housing Units Units Units Units (Total) Redondo 260 150 260 150 260 150 388 204 East Northeast 11,600 3,900 II ,900 4,015 12,300 4,130 15,870 5,705 Subarea Southeast 8,700 3,200 8,800 3,307 8,900 3,340 9,761 3,564 Subarea PAA Total 20,560 7,250 20,960 7,472 21 ,460 7,620 26,019 9,473 Source: 2000 U S Census, and King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning, January 2002; ECONorthwest 2002 and 2003 December 2003 13 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 4.3 Feasibility Study Methodology Cost and Revenue Forecasts There are many ways to forecast costs and revenues associated with annexation. Examples include per capita analysis or estimates that are based on the experiences of a handful of so-called "comparable" cities. The City of Federal Way desired an analysis with a high degree of reliability; therefore the Study Approach to evaluating the fiscal impacts of annexation is based on a more detailed analysis of the fundamental characteristics of the three Major PAA Subareas and comparisons of those characteristics with the defining characteristics of the existing City of Federal Way. The Feasibility Study analysis looks at the fundamental drivers of demand for City services within the existing boundaries of Federal Way, and based on a comparison of similar drivers in the three P AAs, estimates the additional demand for each service that would be introduced by annexation of each area. In the case of law enforcement, for example, a typical assessment of service costs might be based on figures like average-cost-per-resident or the cost associated with extending police services in a manner that would maintain the City's current count of officers-per-thousand-residents. While each of these measures is attractive due to their ease of use, neither measure does a particularly good job of capturing the true demand for police services. To account for the unique characteristics of the PAA Major Subareas (and to account for the many differences between the P AAs and the existing City of Federal Way) the Feasibility Study estimates of the demand drivers for police services take into account, first, differences in the level of commercial activity among each of the areas, and second, the different characteristics of each area's residential base. Among households in each of the P AAs, the Study estimate of police demand distinguishes between the typical demand characteristics associated with five different combinations of housing type and tenure: (l) owner-occupied single- family homes; (2) renter-occupied single-family; (3) owner-occupied multifamily; (4) renter-occupied multifamily; and (5) mobile homes. The estimates of the relative contribution of each of these segments of the residential base to police demand is based on a series of statistical analyses of more than 100 cities across Washington State. Other examples of drivers used in this study include: land area (solid waste and surface water services), signals/street lights/road miles/population (traffic and road maintenance services) as well as several others. Feasibility Study Assumptions The Feasibility Study analysis is based on five assumptions: December 2003 14 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . Redondo East, Northeast and Southeast P AAs would receive levels of service similar to those now provided by the City of Federal Way. The current level of service, staffing and expenditures in Federal Way is the benchmark for forecasting comparable levels of service, staffing and costs in the P AA. Cities that have undertaken annexations in the past have found that there is a surge in demand for services after annexation. The Study methodology of "drivers" and "outputs" produces a more accurate forecast than a simple population-driven forecast, but it may not fully capture the increment of increased demand during the first few months after annexation. The fiscal analysis includes cost and revenue estimates only for those taxes or services that would change upon annexation. The local services that would not change include water and sewer, firelEMS, schools, regional transit, health services, and regional parks. In other words, after annexation existing school and fire district boundaries will remain as they are, and regional transit, health and regional parks will continue to be provided by King County. The Feasibility Study projections of revenues and costs for determining fiscal analysis are conservative. This means that when a forecast includes judgment as well as data, the Study selected lower alternatives for revenues and higher alternatives for costs. . . . . Again Feasibility Study results are integrated throughout the Subarea Plan by relevant topic, but are fully summarized in Section 12. 5 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Environmentally sensitive areas in the P AA include wetlands, streams and lakes, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, and geologic hazard areas. The March 18, 2002, P AA Inventory Report provides a detailed inventory and description of these critical areas. Many of these areas have already been identified, delineated, mapped, and classified. In addition, the Inventory Report details the implications of Federal, State, and local policies regarding environmentally sensitive areas pending any potential future annexation. 5.1 Summary of Inventory The Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), Washington State Priority Habitat and Species Program (PHS), and the State Growth Management Act (GMA) provide levels of protection for endangered, threatened, or sensitive species and habitats, and hazard protection. Please refer to Maps III and IV for locations of sensitive and hazard areas within the P AA. A brief description of the results from December 2003 15 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan research on the environment is provided below. Wetlands There are approximately 440 acres of wetlands in the P AA, with the largest acreage of wetlands found in the Northeast Subarea. Within the smaller individual Community Subareas, Lakeland has the largest acreage of wetlands. See Map III. Both the County and City have regulations protecting wetlands with buffers and other requirements varying by wetland class. Streams A distinctive characteristic of the P AA is that most of the area is a headwater to several major streams (Hylebos Creek, Mullen Slough, and Mill Creek). Most of the streams in the Federal Way PAA are classified by the County as Class 2 with salmonids requiring a 100 foot buffer. If using the City of Federal Way classification system, most streams would be considered Major Streams, also requiring a 1O0-foot buffer. Lakes Lakes in the P AA include Star, Dollof, North, Killarney, Geneva, and Five Mile lakes. The City of Federal Way Code has defined specific wetlands within the City as the Regulated Lakes. i.e. those located in the City and contained in King County Wetlands Inventory Notebook Volume 3, South. Upon annexation of areas containing lakes, the City would designate specific lakes within the P AA as Regulated Lakes. The setback requirement for Regulated Lakes is 25-feet landward in every direction from the ordinary high water mark of the lake. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Based on the State Priority Species and Habitat Mapping Program, within the P AA there are three anadromous running streams. These include the headwaters of West Hylebos creek, the south draining stream from Lake Dolloff and East Hylebos Creek south of Lake Kilarney. King County has also identified downstream and west of 1-5 in the City limits that Hylebos Creek has a "Chinook distribution 500 foot buffer." The City definition of fish and wildlife areas is found in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC 18-28 and 22-1). The Federal Endangered Species Act listings of two fish, Chinook and bulltrout, as threatened are resulting in reassessments of County and City policies and permitting procedures. Interim ESA approaches in the King County permit process include use of existing regulatory tools with greater emphasis on application and enforcement as well as the adoption of more stringent Comprehensive Plan policies. The City of Federal Way requires all project applicants to fill out an "ESA Listed Salmonids Checklist," primarily using the SEP A process to determine mitigation required beyond code requirements. December 2003 16 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Aquifer Recharge Areas King County has mapped low, medium, and high potential groundwater contamination areas in the P AA and has adopted numerous regulations addressing critical aquifer recharge areas. These regulations address on-site sewage disposal systems, clearing restrictions, and through some overlay districts restrict certain land uses. The County is also in the process of preparing a Groundwater Management Program, which is slated to produce a Groundwater Management Plan for South King County, including Federal Way and its P AA. It is expected that this plan will include a work program to guide future actions and will establish a groundwater protection committee to guide its implementation. The Lakehaven Utility District's main source of water is from four aquifer systems that underlie the City: the Redondo-Milton Channel Aquifer, the Mirror Lake Aquifer, the Federal Way Deep Aquifer, and the Eastern Upland Aquifer. The locations of wells in relationship to the aquifer systems are shown on Map III. Aquifer recharge areas are located in areas where permeable soil and rock materials are relatively close to the land surface and where there is an excess of water from precipitation. The Lakehaven Utility District notes that the precise extent of the aquifer recharge areas is uncertain. Highline Water District services a small part of the P AA in the Star Lake area. Until 1962, all water came from the Highline District's wells. Today, about 90 percent of the water supply of the District is purchased from Seattle Public Utilities. The District supplements its Seattle water source with local wells. The wells, which draw from an intermediate aquifer approximately 400 feet underground, were designed to furnish approximately 15 percent of the total volume of water supplied by the District. The District has wells located in Des Moines and also near Angle Lake outside of the PAA and Federal Way. As defined in the City of Federal Way, Sensitive Area Ordinance, siting criteria for wells must comply with State law. Futhermore, any improvement or use on a subject property is subject to State requirements regarding separation of wells from sources of pollution. Frequently Flooded Areas There are no Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)-recognized frequently flooded areas in the City of Federal Way. There is a lOa-year floodplain located around Lake Dolloff in the P AA (See Map III). King County regulations require that development activities including fill may not cause the base flood elevation to rise. Federal Way has similar floodplain regulations in its Surface and Stormwater Management Code, Chapter 21 of the Federal Way City Code. Geologic Hazard Areas There are small portions of the Parkway, Jovita, and North Lake Subareas, which December 2003 17 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan have Landslide Hazard Areas and Erosion Hazard Areas, mostly located near streams or steep slope areas. There are also small portions of the Camelot and Lakeland Subareas that have erosion hazard areas. The Star Lake Subarea has a significant proportion of both Landslide Hazard and Erosion Hazard areas along its eastern border. Please refer to Map IV. 5.2 Environmental Goals and Policies - The following environmental goal and policies are provided to address P AA environmental conditions. Environmental Goal Practice environmental stewardship by protecting, enhancing and promoting the natural environment in and around the P AA. Environmental Policies P AA Env - 1 Prior to and upon annexation, the County and City in partnership shall promote the protection of P AA wetland and lake complexes, as much of the area is a headwater to significant fish-bearing streams, including Hylebos Creek, Mullen Slough, and Mill Creek. P AA Env - 2 The County shall, prior to annexation, manage the 100-year floodplain of Lake Dolloff in accordance with Federal, State, and County laws and guidelines. Regulations to prevent reductions in base flood storage volumes should continue to be implemented. Upon annexation, the City shall continue the policy and practice of floodplain management. P AA Env - 3 Prior to and upon annexation, the County and City in partnership should encourage the establishment of an active lake management system to monitor and manage lake water quality. This management system should actively involve property owners, homeowner's associations, lake management districts, and agency stormwater utilities within the P AA. P AA Env - 4 Prior to the annexation of large areas, updated surface water basin management plans should be prepared by the County in conjunction with the City for the PAA basins and sub-basins, particularly east ofI-5. Basins and sub-basins should be prioritized for study and coordinated with all appropriate State and local agencies. The topology, soils, drainage, flow and channel monitoring, vegetation, habitat identification, utilities, RID maintenance, and mitigation policies should be uniquely identified and defined for each basin/sub- basin. . P AA Env-5 In preparation of applying City Environmentally Sensitive Area regulations in the future, the City and County should inventory and map steep slope areas in the P AA. December 2003 18 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan P AA Env-6 Prior to and upon annexation, the City should coordinate with the King County Solid Waste Division regarding the environmental monitoring of the closed Puyallup/Kit Corner Landfill. P AA Env - 7 The City shall coordinate with King County through interlocal agreements or other means to institute common environmental protection standards while the area is in transition from County to City jurisdiction. Standards would include, but are not limited to, wetland buffers and mitigation standards, stream buffers, geologically hazardous area disturbance avoidance and buffers, and others as appropriate. 6 lAND USE 6.1 Existing land Uses With the exception of the Redondo East neighborhood, which lies along Pacific Highway South and contains a higher percent of land devoted to multifamily or commercial uses, the Federal Way P AA contains primarily single family residential land uses as shown in Figure 5, and in Table 2. Of any neighborhood, the Parkway neighborhood has the most acres in multiple family uses although still primarily containing single family uses. Table 2. Existing Land Use by Parcels CATEGORY Redondo East Star Lake Camelot North Lake Lakeland Parkway Jovita Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Agriculture 0.0 0% 5.5 1% 0.0 0% 1.3 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Commercial 4.8 11% 12.2 1% 7.2 1% 0.9 0% 47.0 3% 1.1 0% 0.0 0% Easements 0.0 0% 6.0 1% 12.3 1% 0.1 0% 6.8 1% 2.8 0% 0.0 0% Industrial \.9 4% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 10.5 1% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% No Data 0.0 0% 1.1 0% 12.1 1% 0.0 0% 0.7 0% 0.0 1% 0.3 0% Office 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.2 0% 2.3 1% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Open Space, 0.2 1% 27.7 3% 35.8 3% \.8 0% 7.7 1% 56.9 9% 0.1 0% Common Areas & Drainage Public Park 0.0 0% 16.7 2% 18.4 1% 0.0 0% 64.7 5% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Quasi-Public 0.0 0% 46.0 5% 49.5 4% 0.0 0% 24.3 2% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Recreation 4.4 10% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Residential, 9.3 21% 6.2 0% 53.4 4% 1.4 0% 30.1 2% 82.8 11% 3.9 0% Multi-Family Residential, 6.9 16% 412.3 50% 702.6 54% 140.6 37% 643.0 47% 27 \.9 41% 217.3 49% Single-Family Rights-of-Way 7.0 16% 105.3 13% 190.6 15% 57.7 15% 179.2 13% 128.7 19% 56.8 13% Utilities 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 30.6 5% 0.0 0% December 2003 19 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan CATEGORY Redondo East Star Lake Camelot North Lake Lakeland Parkway Jovita Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Acres % Vacant 8.8 20% 165.7 20% 202.0 15% 126.5 33% 295.9 22% 87.1 13% 167.1 37% Water 0.0 0% 33.6 4% 20.7 1% 51.9 13% 52.6 4% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% TOTAL 43.3 100% 838.3 100% 1304.8 100% 384.5 100% 1362.5 100% 661.9 100% 445.5 100% Notes: The acre figures are derived from the Arclnfo Geographic Infonnation System (GIS). Multi family includes triplex, fourplcx, apartments, condominiums and group homes. No Data is used for parcels where King County parcel infonnation was unavailable. Easements include transportation and utility. Not all right of way (ROW) is developed. Source: King County Department of Assessments 2001 and City of Federal Way GIS Division, 2002 While the predominant land use in the P AA neighborhoods is residential, there are several businesses including the following types: . Redondo - Convenience stores, taverns, fast food, auto service and repair, personal services, offices, manufacturing, vehicle storage, and others Star Lake - Tavern, nursery Camelot - Gas stations, offices North Lake - Nursery, gas station . . . . Lakeland - Convenience store, espresso, auto repair, day care center Parkway - Auto salvage and towing. PAA Generally - Numerous home occupations (for example, home day care operations, individual construction contractors, home-based professional services, and others). . . During the years 2000 and 2001, King County processed a variety of land use and building permits, including preliminary plats containing approximately 576 lots, as well as multifamily developments totaling about 605 units. The majority of the preliminary plat lots were located in the Star Lake and Lakeland Neighborhoods, and the majority of the multi-family units permitted were located in the North Lake and Star Lake Neighborhoods. Residential development has continued since the compilation of County data in 2000 and 2001. Essential Public Facilities RCW 36.70A.200 states that essential public facilities are "those facilities that are typically difficult to site, such as: . Airports, . State education facilities State or regional transportation facilities as defined in RCW 47.06.140, . . State and local correctional facilities, Solid waste handling facilities, . December 2003 20 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . In-patient facilities including substance facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and Secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW 71.09.020." . Essential public facilities can be government owned and operated facilities, or privately owned facilities that are regulated by public entities. This definition is not considered to be all-inclusive, but provides examples of facilities that are difficult to site. No local comprehensive plan or development regulation may preclude the siting of essential public facilities. The P AA contains several essential public facilities including highways of statewide significance such as 1-5 and SR-18, a WSDOT maintenance facility, the closed & monitored Puyallup/Kit Corner Landfill (see section 12.1, Solid Waste), group homes, and potentially others that remain to be identified beyond present inventory efforts. Under County or City plans and rules, essential public facilities are required to undergo a review process for siting them. Cultural Resources The King County Historic Preservation Program has identified historic properties included in the King County Historic Resource Inventory. The only designated or potentially eligible historic landmarks are in the Lakeland neighborhood of the Southeast Subarea (see Map VI). The Sutherland Grocery and Gas Station, built in the 1930's, was designated a King County Landmark in 2002. The two other potentially eligible historic sites are the Westborg House, a farmhouse built in 1905 by M. Westborg on property originally part of a 160-acre homestead owned by James Duncan, and the Fancher House, a home and barn built in 1923. The King County Historic Preservation Program recommends an inventory update to identify any additional historic properties in the P AA area as well as the City limits since the last inventory was conducted 15 years ago. Additionally, the County recommends an interlocal agreement for preservation services to provide a mechanism and incentives for protecting significant historic properties within the current and future annexed city boundaries. 6.2 land Use Plan The predominant character of theP AA consists of single-family residential with several nodes of commercial and multifamily uses, principally along arterial roadways. The King County land use plans governing the P AA have generally recognized this character. For the Federal Way PAA Subarea Plan, the base or starting point for developing a comprehensive land use plan was first to match the most similar City classification to the current County classification. Although the basis of the PAA Subarea Plan is the King County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the City conducted a detailed review of existing land uses and future land use/zoning classifications to determine if adjustments to the basic land December 2003 21 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan classification system were warranted in certain locations of the P AA. Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis produced a series of maps to help identify: . Nonconfonning Uses: Existing uses that either under the King County classification/zoning system or the City potential classification/zoning system may be considered nonconfonning - i.e. legally established land uses that do not conform to existing zoning regulations. Mobile Home Parks and Units: Mobile home parks and single manufactured homes that mayor may not meet Federal Way manufactured home park design standards. Parcel Size and Minimum Lot Size Requirements: Parcels smaller than the minimum lot size associated with potential zoning categories. . . Additionally, other issues and locations were reviewed, including: . King County R -1 Zoning areas were reviewed to determine if environmental characterIstics warrant Federal Way equivalent zoning (RS- 35.0) to King County's R-l (one residential dwelling per acre) zoning. Potential Incompatibilities: The P AA Subarea Planning team reviewed sites where there could be a potential for incompatibility with City policies/codes, or other concerns. . The result of the land use and zoning analysis is a Land Use Plan that: . Recognizes and supports the predominant single- family suburban character of the P AA. Recognizes the need for neighborhood or community level business goods and services at key nodes in the P AA such as at the intersection of arterials. . Creates a consistent, compatible long-term land use pattern recognizing the predominant and unique character of P AA neighborhoods. land Use Capacity Analysis . The Federal Way PAA has an estimated Year 2003 population of21,460 with most of the population residing in the Northeast Subarea. The GMA and Countywide Planning Policies for King County require that King County and its cities accommodate their fair share of the future growth projected for King County. The PAA has been found to contain a large supply of vacant and underdeveloped land, with the capacity to accommodate significant future development (approximately 3,717 dwelling units as described further below). Future development "targets", expressed in the number of housing units, are determined through an interactive, multi-jurisdictional process between King County and cities located within, considering land capacity, market factors, and other parameters. Through this ongoing regional process, the P AA growth target for the years 2001 to 2022 is established at 1,320 units. The employment target is established at 134 jobs. The P AA land capacity yield can be compared with the December 2003 22 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan growth targets to help determine the ability of the land use plan to meet growth management obligations. As part of a countywide effort to prepare an analysis of buildable lands pursuant to GMA requirements, the County has estimated the capacity of vacant and underdeveloped (land not developed to full potential) lands in the P AA. Consistent with regionally established methods that are tailored to reflect King County conditions, the total vacant and underdeveloped acres were discounted for critical areas such as wetlands, streams, and steep slopes, rights-of-way and public purpose lands, and market factors (i.e. not all property owners would want to sell or develop). These acres were then multiplied by density factors based upon achieved densities in developed projects over the period 1995-2000. The results for the 20-year period of 200 1 to 2022 are a potential dwelling capacity of 3,754 units and an employment capacity of 134 jobs calculated by King County. The City of Federal Way conducted a similar residential capacity analysis with results of 3,717 dwelling units, very close to the County's analysis since similar land use classifications are assumed. It should be noted that a capacity analysis may make adjustments or discounts to the amount of available land, but does not estimate the time or rate that growth will occur, only the capacity of the land for additional development. The market demand for homes and places of employment will in part determine the timing and rate of growth within the 20-year planning period for the P AA. To help identify potential market demands, the City conducted a market analysis for the P AA with the Puget Sound Regional Council forecasts as a starting point. The outcome of the market analysis is a year 2000 to year 2020 projection of2,223 dwelling units and 115 jobs, which for dwellings exceeds the P AA housing targets, and for employment approaches the employment target, in a nearly similar time horizon. For the purposes of capital facility planning the market analysis figures are used to ensure that facility planning efforts do no overestimate facility demand, capital needs, and funding requirements. The market analysis population growth to 2020 and the City level of service standards have been the basis for the capital needs projections in this Subarea Plan. The County or City plans need to accommodate and direct growth in its comprehensive plan, development regulations, and resource allocation decisions, but the achievement of the Subarea Plan land use plan and other policy objectives will be driven in large part by the private sector, including individual property owner decisions. It is the County and City role to provide opportunities and capacity to meet regional fair share growth, monitor growth, and respond to changing needs and circumstances as they arise through regular review of comprehensive plans, development regulations, and budgets. Comprehensive Plan land Use; relationship to Pre- Annexation Zoning As part of implementing the P AA Subarea Plan, the City has the option of December 2003 23 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan adopting a pre-annexation comprehensive plan and zoning map designations (RCW 35.13.177), which would become effective upon annexation. Pre- annexation comprehensive plan classification and zoning map designations could provide more certainty to property owners and residents about the future character of the area should they annex to the City. As part of the Federal Way PAA Subarea Planning Process, a more specific P AA Pre-Annexation Zoning Map shown in Map VII-2 has been prepared to correspond to the proposed P AA Pre- Annexation Comprehensive Plan in Map VII-I. The process of adopting a pre-annexation land use plan and pre-annexation zoning would follow these steps in accordance with RCW 35.13: After a proposed comprehensive plan or zoning regulation is prepared, the legislative body of the city must hold at least two public hearings on it. These hearings must be held at least 30 days apart. Notice of each hearing must be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the annexing city and in the area to be annexed. The notice must give the time and place of hearing. A copy of the ordinance or resolution adopting the proposed plan, any part of the proposed plan, or any amendment, together with any map referred to or adopted by the ordinance or resolution, must be filed with the county auditor and the city clerk. The ordinance, resolution, and map must be duly certified as a true copy by the clerk of the annexing city. The county auditor is to record the ordinance or resolution and keep the map on file. (Municipal Research & Services Center of Washington, Annexation Handbook, Revised December 2001 - Report No. 19) The adopting ordinance for the pre-annexation plan and zoning should specify the time interval following an annexation during which the ordinance adopting the pre-annexation plan and zoning, must remain in effect before it may be amended, supplemented or modified by subsequent ordinance or resolution adopted by the annexing city or town. Any amendment to the pre-annexation land use plan that is adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan is subject to the general GMA limitation that the comprehensive plan may be amended no more frequently than once a year, unless exceptions are met. (Municipal Research & Services Center of Washington, Annexation Handbook, Revised December 2001 - Report No. 19) The Steering Committee has held public meetings in preparing the Subarea Plan. Planning Commission and City Council public hearings are planned as part of the remainder of the Subarea Plan process to fulfill local City public participation requirements and the requirements to ultimately establish a Pre-Annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designations. See Section 1.5. December 2003 24 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 6.3 land Use Goals and Policies The P AA land use goal and policies are provided in this section, and address land use character and land use planning in the P AA. land Use Goal Respect the character, integrity, and unique qualities of P AA neighborhoods in land use planning efforts. land Use Policies General Policies P AA LV - 1 Proposed annexations should be implemented to be consistent with the pre-annexation land use plans and zoning of the Federal Way PAA Subarea Plan. (See Policy P AA Annex-4.) P AA LV - 2 City and County plans and regulations shall emphasize single- family detached dwellings as the primary use in the P AA' s established single- family neighborhoods. P AA LV - 3 The City and County P AA commercial and multi-family land use patterns and regulations should meet community needs, respect the hierarchy of districts and centers in the Federal Way planning area, and support the Federal Way City Center. P AA LV - 4 The City and County P AA land use plan should provide sufficient zoned capacity, and a variety of housing types, to address total household growth targets for the P AA. P AA LV - 5 Areas with significant environmental hazards, unique or fragile ecosystems of high rank, order, and function, or long-term infrastructure limitations, may be further protected beyond the application of development regulations through Federal Way RS-35.0 zoning in the Star Lake, Jovita, and Parkway neighborhoods. P AA LV - 6 To promote financially self-supporting annexations, the City should support the County in facilitating or conducting coordinated master or sub- area planning of vacant, underdeveloped, or transitionalland areas in the P AA that may present unique and/or highly visible sites for high tax generating land uses, such as but not limited to auto sales. Expedited or advanced environmental review, incentives to encourage assemblages of land, and/or coordinated and comprehensive approaches to site development and environmental protection should be considered. Cultural Resources Policy PAALV-7 Prior to and upon annexation, the City and County should December 2003 25 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan coordinate with the King County Historic Preservation Program, the Cultural Development Authority of King County, and local historical societies (such as the Historic Society of Federal Way) to promote the preservation of historic resources in the PAA. P AA LU-8 The City and/or County should conduct a P AA historic inventory update prior to or upon annexation. P AA LU-9 The City should consider mechanisms to offer historic preservation services-and incentives in the P AA upon the annexation of P AA properties into the City, including, but not limited to, an interlocal agreement with King County for resource evaluation and incentives. Economic Development Policies PAA LV - 10 Commercial locations, development standards, and pennitted uses of City and County Comprehensive Plans and Zoning Regulations should reflect a hierarchy of business districts, recognizing the Federal Way City Center as the primary Citywide business center, and business districts in the P AA as secondary and tertiary nodes catering to local and/or neighborhood needs. P AA LU - 11 The City and County should support neighborhood level business retention, improvement, and development on commercially zoned properties to the east of 1-5 to meet the needs of local residents. PAA LU -12 The City and County should promote the redevelopment and strengthening of viable commercial centers, such as in the Redondo East Community Subarea. P AA LV - 13 Commercial development should be encouraged on properties designated commercial on the P AA Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning maps to help meet the P AA employment target determined in the Countywide Planning Policies. Essential Public Facilities Policies The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element policies address essential public facilities. Additional policies are not proposed. 7 HOUSING 7.1 Summary of Inventory The Federal Way PAA has an estimated Year 2003 population of21,460 with the larger population residing in the Northeast Subarea. As of the Year 2000, a majority of the dwelling units are single-family (83 percent; 6,050 units) in the December 2003 26 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan P AA as a whole, and most dwellings are owner-occupied rather than rented except in Redondo East. Most of the single-family housing has typically been developed since 1960. However, there are pockets of older, well-maintained homes occupied by long- time area residents. The communities with the newest single-family housing stock i.pclude Red°!ldo East, Star Lake, and Parkway. Few single-family homes are considered to be in poor condition and most are considered average in all neighborhoods. Neighborhoods with the highest percent of homes rated "good" by the King County Assessor include Camelot, Jovita, and Lakeland. There are about 1,200 multifamily units in the P AA (17 percent of total Year 2000 units). PAA multifamily complexes (excluding mobile home parks) are described by the King County Assessor as average or low quality in condition. The King County Countywide Planning Policies commit the City and the County to ensuring there is capacity in their Comprehensive Plans to meet their assigned targets, which for the P AA equals 1,320 additional housing units. There is sufficient vacant and underdeveloped land in the P AA to accommodate this target without significant zoning changes. It should be noted, however, that the timing and rate of this growth would occur based upon market forces. In addition to apportioning general housing growth targets, the Countywide Planning Policies indicate that jurisdictions should promote affordable housing to low and very low income households, at 20-25 percent and 17 percent of the overall housing target respectively. In 1998, King County published a King County Market Rate AfJordability Study. A review of the housing stock affordability was conducted for the City of Federal Way, and all of Unincorporated King County. The results show that Federal Way and Unincorporated King County as a whole provide substantial percentages of affordable housing, both ownership and rental, particularly in relation to other King County locations. Housing sales information for the P AA would tend to support the Countywide study. Considering principal and interest (7 percent assumed) costs, most single-family homes would be affordable to households of Low-Median income level (80 percent), and some are affordable to Moderate Income households (60 percent). Relative to each other, the Jovita and Camelot neighborhoods are the most affordable, and the Star Lake and Redondo East neighborhoods are the least affordable. See Table 3. December 2003 27 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Table 3. P AA Housing Sales and Affordability Housing/Mortgage Characteristic Camelot North Star Jovita Lakeland Parkway Redondo Lake Lake East Median Sales Price for SF Sales* $162,500 $174,000 $245,000 $159,500 $203,000 $185,000 $214,900 Count of Transactions 466 35 259 70 186 264 10 200 I Average Assessed Value of Single Family Homes $152,443 $187,658 $187,301 $160,798 $189,162 $172,263 $212,029 Monthly Mortgage Payment for 95% $1,026.59 $1,099.25 $1,547.79 $1,007.64 $1,282.45 $1,168.74 $1,357.63 Median Sales Price: 7% interest** Annual Mortgage Costs for 95% Median $12,319.13 $13,190.94 $18,573.45 $12,091.70 $15,389.43 $14,024.85 $16,291.57 Sales Prices: 7% interest** Year 2002, income level at 80% of median $54,400 King County Income, Family of 4 Year 2002, income level at 60% of median $46,740 King County Income, Family of 4 80% of Median Income x 30% of Annual $16,320.00 Income, Family of 4 60% of Median Income x 30% of Annual $14,022.00 Income, Family of 4 Notes: *Includes recorded sales valued at $25,000 and above for the years 1999, 2000, and most of 200 I. ** Assumes Mortgage Payment Factors (principal and interest only) 30 year fixed, 7 percent interest. The inclusion of taxes and insurance, as well as a higher interest rate would raise monthly housing costs, but there appears to be a margin between the mortgage figures and affordable monthly housing costs, which would mean conclusions would generally stay the same when factoring in those other costs. Source: ECONorthwest, Inc.; Bucher, Willis & Ratliff; U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development As growth occurs, a key policy would be to help maintain the conditions allowing for housing affordable to a variety of incomes. 7.2 Housing Goals and Policies For the PAA, the following housing goal and policy have been developed. Housing Goal Promote the preservation and enhancement existing residential neighborhoods, and allow for new housing developments meeting future needs in the P AA. Housing Policy P AA House - 1 The City, in cooperation with King County, should promote the preservation of existing housing. Private investment should be encouraged in older residential neighborhoods, and multifamily complexes. Programs supporting weatherization, home repair and rehabilitation, and infrastructure maintenance should be supported. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Housing Element policies address housing stock protection, existing and future affordability, and special needs, and would also be applicable to the P AA. December 2003 28 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan 8 PARKS AND RECREATION 8.1 Summary of Parks Planning Efforts and Inventory The City of Federal Way Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services (PRCS) Department has prepared a Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Comprehensive Plan, which was originally created in 1991 and updated in 1995 and 2000. The PRCS plan is currently being updated and, once completed, will be adopted by reference into the FWCP. The plan divides the City and P AA into subareas for purposes of long-range planning. The primary goal of the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Comprehensive Plan is to assure that a park serves every neighborhood in Federal Way. Currently, the City is providing 10.1 acres of parks per 1,000 population in the current City limits. The City's goal is to provide a level of service of 10.9 acres per 1,000 in population within the City limits. The City's goal is to maintain this level of service standard as Federal Way grows in population and size. The City of Federal Way's existing parks and recreational areas are divided into six categories. Each category represents a distinct type of recreational activity or opportunity. Please note that this classification system is for the existing parks only. The categories are: Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks, Regional Parks, Special Use Areas, Trails, and Undeveloped Land/Open Space Areas. The total parkland in Federal Way equals 846.0 acres as of year 2002. The PAA is primarily served by five County park sites totaling 109.52 acres. See Table 4. All of the active park facilities are located in the Lakeland community subarea, while natural park and passive park areas are found in the Star Lake and Camelot community subareas. Completed in 2000, the South County Ballfields Phase 2 is the only recent capital project completed in the P AA. Furthermore, King County Executive's Proposed 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program does not include plans for any new projects or improvements in the P AA. Table 4. P AA Park Facilities Owned By King County P AA Neighborhood Park Site Name County Park Plan Acreage Classification Star Lake Bingaman Pond Natural 16.72 Camelot Camelot Park Passive 18.08 Lakeland Five Mile Lake Park Active 31.7] Lake Geneva Park Active 18.64 South County Ballfields Active 24.37 Total Acres 109.52 Source: Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March] 8,2002 December 2003 29 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan In addition to King County parks, the Federal Way School District (during non- school hours) and the State of Washington also provide public recreation facilities and opportunities in the P AA. These include sites located in the Camelot, and North Lake community subareas. Private recreation facilities may also be required in residential subdivisions and developments of five units or more in accordance with King County development regulations and King County's determination of recreation facility needs. 8.2 Future Parks and Recreation Needs Currently, the PAA's existing amount of park acres does not meet the City's level of service standard for parks and recreation (see Table 5). Additionally with forecast growth additional demand for park services would occur. These existing and forecast park and recreation needs to meet City levels of service would require investment of capital and operating revenue sources to provide for park services. Table 6 identifies the capital costs of providing park services to meet existing and future parks & recreation needs for the major subareas of the P AA: Redondo, Northeast (Star Lake, Camelot, and North Lake) and Southeast (Lakeland, Jovita, Parkland). A discussion of public service operating and capital costs and revenues, including Parks & Recreation, can be found in Section 12, Public Services and Capital Facilities. Table 5. P AA and City Parks Levels of Service Redondo Northeast Southeast Federal Way Level of Service Measure East P AA PAA PAA Subarea Subarea A. Neighborhood Park Land Acres per 1,000 Population. Total acres of parks (2-7 acres) with playgrounds divided by population (times 1,000) Actual Level of Service (acres per 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1,000) Level of Service Standard (acres per NA* NA* NA* 1.7 1,000) 8. Community Park Land Acres per 1,000 Population. Total acres of community-wide parks (15-25 acres) for active use divided by population (times 1,000) Actual Level of Service (acres per 0 0 8.6 2.6 1,000) Level of Service Standard (acres per NA* NA* NA* 2.8 1,000) C. Trail Acres per 1,000 Population. Total acres of trail system divided by population (times 1,000) ** Actual Level of Service (acres per 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1,000) Level of Service Standard (acres per NA* NA* NA* 2.2 1,000) December 2003 30 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Redondo Northeast Southeast Federal Way Level of Service Measure East P AA PAA PAA Subarea Subarea D. Open Space Acres per 1,000 Population' Total acres undeveloped land by population (times 1,000) Actual Level of Service (acres per 0.0 3.0 0.0 4.2 1,000) Level of Service Standard (acres per NA* NA* NA* 6.0 1,000) E. Community Center Square Feet per 1,000 Population' Total square feet - divided by population (times 1,000) Actual Level of Service (square feet 0.0 0.0 0.0 131 per 1,000) Level of Service Standard (square feet NA* NA* NA* 600 per 1,000) Source: Henderson, Young & Company, July 11,2003 * King County LOS standards are based on a parks classification system that is different than the City of Federal Way ** There are no trails in the P AA meeting the City's definition of a trail. Table 6. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Costs for Parks and Recreation Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 ID 1.00 Areawide CIP 0 0 0 0 Programs 2.00 Parkway Neighborhood 2.01 Neighborhood Parks 271,581 810,006 1,081,587 360,529 360,529 360,529 2.02 Community Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.03 Trails 229,878 1,348,618 1,578,496 526,165 526,165 526,165 2.04 Open Space 1,198,152 5,573 1,203,725 401,242 401,242 401,242 2.05 Community Center 0 334,368 334,368 111,456 111,456 111,456 Subtotal Parkway 0 1,699,611 2,498,565 4,198,176 1,399,392 1,399,392 1,399,392 Neighborhood 3.00 Jovita Neighborhood 3.01 Neighborhood Parks 89,416 266,688 356,104 118,701 118,701 118,701 3.02 Community Parks 147,273 774,897 922,170 307,390 307,390 307,390 3.03 Trails 75,686 444,022 519,708 173,236 173,236 173,236 3.04 Open Space 394,482 1,835 396,317 132,106 132,106 132,106 3.05 Community Center 0 110,088 110,088 36,696 36,696 36,696 Subtotal Jovita 0 706,857 1,597,530 2,304,387 768,129 768,129 768,129 Neighborhood 4.00 Lakeland Neighborhood December 2003 31 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 ID 4.01 Neighborhood Parks ¡ 98,072 590,761 788,833 262,944 262,944 262,944 4.02 Community Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.03 Trails 167,657 983,585 1,151,242 383,747 383,747 383,747 4.04 Open Space 873,846 4,064 877,910 292,637 292,637 2'ì2,637 4.05 Community Center 0 243,864 243,864 81,288 81,288 81,288 Subtotal Lake1and o 1,239,575 1,822,274 3,061,849 1,020,616 1,020,616 1,020,616 Neighborhood Subtotal Southeast 0 3,646,043 5,918,369 9,564,412 3,188,137 3,188,137 3,188,137 Area 5.00 North Lake Neighborhood 5.01 Neighborhood Parks 146,434 436,748 583,182 194,394 194,394 194,394 5.02 Community Parks 241,185 1,269,027 1,510,212 503,404 503,404 503,404 5.03 Trails 123,948 727,162 851,110 283,703 283,703 283,703 5.04 Open Space 646,032 3,005 649,037 2 I 6,346 216,346 216,346 5.05 Community Center 0 180,288 180,288 60,096 60,096 60,096 Subtotal North Lake 0 1,157,599 2,616,230 3,773,829 1,257,943 1,257,943 1,257,943 Neighborhood 6.00 Star Lake Neighborhood 6.01 Neighborhood Parks 235,557 702,564 938,121 312,707 312,707 3 12,707 6.02 Community Parks 387,977 2,041,390 2,429,367 809,789 809,789 809,789 6.03 Trails 199,386 1,169,731 1,369,117 456,372 456,372 456,372 6.04 Open Space 320,264 1,490 321,754 107,251 107,251 107,251 6.05 Community Center 0 290,016 290,016 96,672 96,672 96,672 Subtotal Star Lake 0 1,143,184 4,205,191 5,348,375 1,782,792 1,782,792 1,782,792 Neighborhood' 7.00 Camelot Neighborhood 7.01 Neighborhood Parks 551,934 1,646,176 2,198,110 732,703 732,703 732,703 7.02 Community Parks 909,068 4,783,178 5,692,246 1,897,415 1,897,415 1,897,415 7.03 Trails 467,181 2,740,795 3,207,976 1,069,325 1,069,325 1,069,325 7.04 Open Space 1,657,564 7,710 1,665,274 555,091 555,091 555,091 7.05 Community Center 0 679,536 679,536 226,512 226,512 226,512 Subtotal Camelot 0 3,585,747 9,857,395 13,443,142 4,481,047 4,481,047 4,481,047 Neighborhood Subtotal Northeast 0 5,886,530 16,678,816 22,565,346 7,521,782 7,521,782 7,521,782 Area 8.00 Redondo East December 2003 32 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Constr uction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 201S-2020 ID Neighborhood ~.OI Neighborhood Parks 22,690 67,675 90,365 30,122 30,122 30,122 ~.O2 Community Parks 37,372 196,63~ 234,010 78,003 78.003 n,O()3 8.03 Trails 19,206 112,675 131,881 43,960 43,960 43.960 ~.04 Open Spaee 100,104 466 !O(),570 33,523 33,523 33.523 8.05 Community Center () 27,936 27,936 9,312 9,312 9,312 Subtotal Redondo Area 0 179,372 405,390 584,762 194,921 194,921 194,921 Total 0 9,711,945 23,002,575 32,714,520 10,904,840 10,904,840 10,904,840 Source: Henderson Young and Company, 2003 To develop capital cost estimates, first, the standard for park land was multiplied times the population of each neighborhood in the P AA to calculate the number of acres of each type of park land that is needed to serve the population of each area. Second, the acres needed were compared to the number of acres of existing parks. Whenever the acres needed were more than the acres of existing parks, the difference is the number of acres to be acquired through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Third, the cost of acres to be acquired through the CIP was estimated using City estimates of costs per acre. The CIP project costs were calculated by multiplying the City's cost per acre (or mile, or square foot, as appropriate) times the number of acres (or miles or square feet) needed for each neighborhood. The portion of the park capital cost estimate that would be attributed to meeting the higher City parks level of service standard for the existing population (i.e. the cost of the existing "deficiency" -- providing Federal Way's level of service to the existing P AA population) is $25.6 million, and the cost of growth through the year 2020 is $7.1 million for a total cost of $32.7 million. The Northeast Subarea has low maintenance costs because it has little parkland now. The high capital cost in this CIP will bring the Northeast Subarea up to the City's standard, and that, in turn, will cause a significant increase in future operating costs. 8.3 Parks & Recreation Goals and Policies The following goal and policies address P AA parks and recreation needs. Parks Goal Maintain current facilities and acquire new lands to meet P AA community park and recreation needs. December 2003 33 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Parks Policies P AA Park - 1 The City should continue to address the P AA in its comprehensive parks, recreation, and open space system plans. P AA Park - 2 , The City should review County park maintenance and operation plans for each County park facility that may be transferred in the event of annexation. The City will assess available resources at the time of annexation and determine the appropriate level of maintenance for all acquired County facilities. P AA Park - 3 Additional parkland, open space, and trails should be acquired and developed according to the standards outlined in the City of Federal Way Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Comprehensive Plan. Phasing in a gradually increasing level of service standard may be appropriate based on agency resources at the time of annexation. 9 SURFACE WATER 9.1 Summary of Inventory The P AA is almost entirely within the nearly level upland plateau which is immediately adjacent to steep slopes at the edge of the Green and White River valleys, and Puget Sound (in the case of the Redondo Subarea). As a result, historical stormwater systems within the P AA include a series of lake and wetland complexes that drain in steep ravines to the rivers and streams below. The most distinctive characteristic of the P AA is that most of the area is a headwater to several significant streams (Hylebos Creek, Mullen Slough, and Mill Creek). Five drainage basins have been identified by King County mapping within the P AA. These designations also agree with the City of Federal Way designations: Lower Green River, Mill Creek, White River, Hylebos Creek, and Lower Puget Sound. See Map VIII. Surface Water Facilities Within the various drainage basins, the P AA contains a variety of surface water facilities that require inspection and maintenance by several County divisions and/or property owners as listed in Tables 7 through 9: December 2003 34 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Table 7. In-Road Surface Water Facilities Measurement Unit Redondo Northeast Southeast Facility Subarea Subarea Subarea Curb And Gutter LF lineal feèt 1,902 252,806 92,206 Catch Basin & Manhole EA each 19 1,361.00 633 Paved Ditch And Gutter LF lineal feet 0 755 450 Open Ditch LF lineal feet 707 85,292.00 81,916.00 SP lineal feet Enclosed System stonn pipe 1,557 149,913 70,980 Cross Tile And Access EA each 9 985 699 Cross Culverts EA each 7 614 332 Curb & Gutter And Thick RM road mile 0.3 55.2 22.5 Bridge Drains EA each 0 6 6 Auxiliary Pipe LF lineal feet I 2,697 1,611 Trash Racks EA each 0 0 0 Headwalls EA each 0 I 0 Cross Culverts LF lineal feet 0 590 0 Box Culverts EA each 0 0 0 RID Facilities EA each 0 2 1 Source: King County Roads Division, January 2002 Table 8. Regional Stormwater Facilities Subarea Facility Name Address Type Of Facility Northeast Sweet Briar Drainage 4700 S 29200 St. Pipe Improvement (immediately east of 4613 S. 292nd ) Northeast P-32 (Camelot Park) 29800 36tn PI. S. Pump Station Northeast Lake Dolloff Outlet 4200 308tn PI. S. Channel/weir Southeast Peasley Canyon Culvert 5100 S. Peasley Canyon Rd. Culvert Southeast S. 360tn St. Embankment 2100 S. 360tn St. Regional RID Southeast Regency Woods Div I 37546 21st Ave. S. HOPE Pipe Southeast Regency Woods Div I 37694 18tn PI. S. HOPE Pipe Southeast Regency Woods Div 4 37934231'0 PI. S. HOPE Pipe Southeast Regency Woods Div 4 37811 21st Ct. S. HOPE Pipe Southeast Regency Woods Div 4 1817 S 380m PI. HOPE Pipe Source: King County Department of Natural Resources, December 21, 200 I; January 29, 2002 Table 9. Residential and Commercial Drainage Facilities Type Of Facility Subarea Number Of Facilities Residential Northeast 40 Southeast 26 Redondo I Total 67 December 2003 35 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Type Of Facility Subarea Number Of Facilities Commercial Northeast 9 Southeast 16 Redondo 4 Total 29 TOTAL 96 Source: King County Department of Natural Resources, December 21, 200 I; January 29, 2002. Surface Water Level of Service Analysis, July 11,2003. Regional and local surface water facilities are shown on Map VIII. Surface Water Problems One function of drainage system maintenance is to respond to complaints and problems in connection with drainage conditions. The data in the P AA Inventory report (March 18,2002) indicated that most of the citizen complaints have come out of the Star Lake and Camelot neighborhoods in the Northeast subarea, two of the more populated neighborhoods. However, out of 160 complaints received in the past 5 years, only 8 remained open with the King County Roads Maintenance Division as of December 2002. The closed complaints were resolved in various ways: technical advice, determination that there was no identifiable problem, maintenance work, referral to other agencies, etc. Most complaints appeared to be resolved with routine responses. A few complaints required more study or action for resolution. No information was obtained about their disposition. It is likely that some of the more enduring problems overlap the drainage problems observed by King County Road Maintenance, discussed below. Discussion with King County Roads Maintenance Division 3 indicates a number of locations with drainage related problems. Certain street locations are subject to occasional flooding. Also, as noted in the P AA Inventory, the area around Lake Dolloff, is in a designated floodplain. Recently the Roads Maintenance Division addressed surface water problems with a 48-inch crosstile at Peasley Canyon Road, and a pipe and catch basin within an easement to Lake Geneva. The Peasley Canyon Road area is subject to landslide and erosion due to sensitive environmental conditions (designated landslide and erosion hazard area). Lake Geneva is subject to periodic maintenance for cleaning of inlets and drainage structures, which indicates potential for periodic sediment and debris accumulations. More problematic drainage conditions indicated by King County Roads Maintenance Division 3 are listed in Table 10. The drainage facilities and locations listed are subject to flooding by excessive stormwater flows, and must be monitored during storms. The problems are severe enough to warrant study of a design solution for the facility and the local drainage system. Several other nearby areas with known problems are also listed in the following Table I 1. The problems may be related to drainage conditions in the P AA, possibly contributing flow or groundwater, and Federal Way may be asked to participate in a solution to December 2003 36 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan that problem. Problems on Tables 10 and 11 appear on Map VIII. Table 10. Road Maintenance Problems in PAA King County Maintenance Division 3 No. Subarea Street Problem I. Northeast SE nil St. ({I; [-5 2 Catch basins 2. Northeast 3366 S. 290 SI. 2 Catch basins 3. Northeast 3i1 Ave. S. & S. 304 Water over road signs. On going problem. 4. Southeast S 342 St. & 44 Ave. S. Crosstile e/of 44 Ave. S. Should be monitored. Source: King County Roads Maintenance Division 3, 2002, Updated April 2003 Table 11. Road Maintenance Problems Near P AA King County Maintenance Division 3 No. Subarea Street Problem 5. Northeast S. 296 St. east of 64 Steep bank, excessive water. Should be monitored. Ave. S. w/ofW. Valley Rd from 64 Ave S. Down to Merideth Hill 6. Northeast S. 296th St east of 61 Crosstile to pond. Should be monitored. Ave. S. w/of55 Ave. S. 7. Northeast Lower Lk. Fenwick Rd. 36" inlet to MH/1ake overflow. Needs to be monitored. S. 8. Northeast West Valley Hwy bit S Flooding. Needs to be monitored. 272 - S 285 9. Redondo East Old Star Lake Road All inlets and Catch basins. Needs to be monitored. from S 272 to Military Source: King County Roads Maintenance Division 3, 2002, Updated April 2003 It is anticipated that after annexation, Federal Way will experience a similar level of complaints and responses in the P AA. Costs associated with complaint response would include staff time to respond to inquiries and issues, and the labor, equipment and materials to provide minor corrective actions. Non-routine problems, i.e. street flooding, severe stream bank erosion, etc., may become more identifiable over time and require further action. Certain problem areas may require continual non-routine maintenance due to existing environmental conditions (such as Peasley Canyon Road), or could become candidates for further study and capital improvements (such as Lakes Geneva and Dolloff). 9.2 Future Surface Water Needs As part of a more detailed level of service analysis (Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11,2003), program and capital improvements have been identified. To transition the P AA from the existing County level of service to the Federal Way program for surface water, the following actions will be needed: . The City will need to conduct a field inventory of the storm drainage conveyance system for inclusion in a map or GIS database. December 2003 37 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan . The City facilities and GIS databases will need to be updated to provide coverage of the P AA. The increased inventory of facilities to maintain, due to the annexation, will over the long term require a propOliional increase in the Cit/s maintenance budget. Increased program spacc needs will possibly require larger maintenance facilities than those currently planned by Federal Way and possibly acceleratc the need for new facilities. . . . It is anticipated that after annexation, Federal Way will experience a level of complaints and responses in the P AA similar to current levels. Costs associated with complaint response would include staff time to respond to inquiries and issues, and the labor, equipment and materials to provide minor corrective actions. Non-routine problems, i.e. street flooding, severe stream bank erosion, etc., may become more identifiable over time and require further action. Certain problem areas may require continual non-routine maintenance due to existing environmental conditions (such as Peasley Canyon Road), or could become candidates for further study and capital improvements (such as Lakes Geneva and Dolloff). . . Ten Regional Stormwater Facilities constructed and maintained by King County will need to be maintained by Federal Way. King County has identified 67 residential and 29 commercial drainage facilities in the P AA. The residential facilities are inspected and maintained by King County. The commercial facilities are inspected by King County and maintained by the property owner. Federal Way will need to evaluate the feasibility of inspection and maintenance. An initial sustained cleaning effort will likely be needed to bring the ditch system to a level of improvement where minimal routine maintenance would be needed. This could take approximately two years, depending on the levels of accumulations and restoration needed, and may need to respond to the Tri-County Regional Road Maintenance Program, a program that implements road maintenance practices that protect habitat by reducing pollutants and sediment from reaching environmentally sensitive areas such as rivers, streams and wetlands. The program also encourages the removal of old road culverts and other blockages that prevent fish from reaching spawning areas. It is anticipated with the annexation that Federal Way may take a more active role with the drainage and water quality aspects of the P AA lake system. There are various options for Federal Way to set up the lake management system, including use of homeowners associations, lake management districts, and the City's stormwater management utility. Upon annexation of the P AA, it is anticipated that Federal Way will expand its water quality program to provide more lake water quality . . . . December 2003 38 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan . management and surface water quality monitoring. This could include a variety of program elements, such as volunteer groups, monitoring stations, community organization, and public education. Federal Way will need to increase other stonnwater program components to include the P AA. A notable expansion element will be a field inventory of the storm drainage system, which is a part of the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination requirement in the Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. . Potential capital improvements are anticipated to include: 0 The four problem areas indicated in Table 10, from King County Maintenance Division 3. Some additional improvements may be needed depending on the outcome of complaints that have remained open as shown in the P AA Inventory. 0 King County Executive Proposed Basin Plan for Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound include the following: - Project 2442: S.360th Street Regional Detention Pond - Construct a regional detention facility on tributary 00 116A at about S 360th Street (extended). This project may be completed through a partnership with the Washington State Department of Transportation and the City of Federal Way. - Project 2444: SR 161 Conveyance Upgrades- Upgrade three culvert crossings at tributaries 00 16A, 0016, and 0006. - Project 2446: SR 161 Regional Pond - Construct a regional detention facility on tributary 0015 at SR 161. As the Basin Plan is ten years old, it is likely that the conditions and potential project list should be re-examined and prioritized. 0 There are several projects identified in the Mill Creek Special Area Management Plan and Mill Creek Basin Flood Management Plan. These projects are not within the P AA, however the City of Federal Way may be asked to help adjacent jurisdictions with cost sharing in the future if annexation occurs because King County was identified as a possible agency which could provide cost sharing and because of the location of the headwaters for these projects within the P AA. The projects identified are as follows: - Bingaman Creek Levee Overflow Improvements (King County). - Study of Mullen Slough Intercept Hillside Drainage (King County). - Sediment Trap on Peasley Canyon Tributary (City of Auburn). Due to the date of the basin study in 1997, some of these projects may December 2003 39 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan have begun and may have received funding from other sources. These projects are not within the P AA and were not included in P AA CIP cost estimates. To meet City surface water level of service standards, and accomplish the studies and improvements identified in the P AA studies, capital cost estimates have been developed and are summarized in Table 12. Table 12. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Costs for Surface Water Capital Improvements Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Year of Construction and 2002 Dollars (000) Project 10 Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 1.00 Area Wide Programs 1.01 Stonn Drain System 300 300 300 Inventory and Comprehensive Plan Major Maintenance: 1.02 Ditch Cleaning 544 544 1.03 Stonnwater Facility 223 223 Cleaning Subtotal Genera 300 1,067 1,067 2.00 Parkway Neighborhood Hylebos Executive Proposed Plan 2.01 2442-S 360th Regional Det. 1,565 1,565 Pond 2.02 2444-SR 161 Conveyance 372 372 Upgrades 4.00 Lakeland Neighborhood Hylebos Executive Proposed Plan 4.01 2446-SR 161 Regional 598 598 Pond King County Road Maintenance Div 3 - Identified Problems 4.02 Crosstile east of 44 Ave. S 7 35 42 42 Subtotal Southeast Area 7 35 2,578 2,578 7.00 Camelot Neighborhood King County Road Maintenance Div 3 - Identified ProblEms December 2003 40 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Year of Construction and 2002 Dollars (000) Project ID Capi tal Projcct List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 7.0] (I) 2 Catch basins 7 35 42 42 7.02 (2) 2 Catch basins 7 35 42 42 7.03 (5) Water over road signs 165 825 990 990 Subtotal Northeast Area 179 895 1,074 1,074 Subtotal Redondo Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 486 0 930 4,719 4,719 Source: TetraTech/KCM, Inc., 2003 Notes: (I) All projects assumed for construction in 5 years unless differently stated in source CIP document (2) No separate cost given for design, acquisition for Hylebos, certain other CIP figures (3) Estimated cost for maintenance problems and projects assume 100 percent contingency (very general estimates). Pennitting costs were assumed to be included in the contingency. (4) Costs escalated from original sources to 2002 dollars (5) Does not include water quality program costs, including lake management (6) Does not include routine maintenance increase, such as catch basin cleaning, street sweeping. (7) There are several projects identified in the Mill Creek SAMP and Mill Creek Basin Flood Management Plan. These projects are not within the PAA, however the City of Federal Way may be asked to help adjacent jurisdictions with cost sharing in the future if annexation occurs because King County was identified as a possible agency which could provide cost sharing and because of the location of the headwaters for these projects within the PAA. However, there has been no detennination of specific cost share by Federal Way, and none are estimated above. (8) Cost data for estimates were derived from the following sources: a. Federal Way estimates for ditch cleaning, with a 33 percent contingency. b. Federal Way staff infonnation for pond cleaning costs. Pond facilities (wet ponds, infiltration facilities, etc.) were estimated at $5,000 per facility. Other facilities (catch basins, tanks, etc.) were assumed at $1,000 per facility. The costs were assumed to include some contingency; therefore, no additional contingency was applied. c. Planning cost estimates for stonnwater facilities developed for the City of Auburn 2002 Comprehensive Drainage Plan. Conveyance costs included a ratio of four catch basins per 300 feet. When individual catch basins or manholes were indicated, separate cost estimates for the catch basin or manhole were made, using the planning cost estimates developed for the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) outfall inventory project (2002). d. Costs for certain stonnwater facilities, and costs for mobilization, traffic control, tax, engineering, and land acquisition were obtained from planning cost estimates developed for WSDOT outfall inventory project (2002). A discussion of public service operating and capital costs and revenues including the Surface Water enterprise fund, can be found in Section 12, Public Services and Capital Facilities. 9.3 Surface Water Goals and Policies Surface water management would be guided by the following goal and policies. Surface Water Goal Promote a P AA surface water system that protects the environment and property, and allows for efficient operation and maintenance. December 2003 41 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Surface Water Policy In addition to Natural Environment and Capital Facility policies, the following policy is provided specific to surface water concerns: P AA SW -1 Prior to annexations of large areas, the County, in conjunction with the City and in partnership with other agencies, should further inventory surface water facilities and conditions, and prepare hydrologic models and basin plans for the P AA areas east of 1-5. Surface water analysis of the Redondo East Subarea should occur as necessary, in conjunction with any area-wide subbasin or basin plans for the vicinity. 10 TRANSPORTATION 10.1 Summary of Inventory The Federal Way PAA is served by a series of arterial roadways that provide local and regional transportation access. Refer to Map IX King County has been responsible for maintenance of public roadways and accompanying facilities such as shoulders, sidewalks, traffic signs, striping and signals, guardrails, and landscaping. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has jurisdiction over state highways within the P AA. State Highways located within the boundaries of the Study Area include Interstate 5 (1-5), SR-18, SR-99 (Pacific Highway S) and SR-161 (Enchanted Parkway S). The City of Federal Way is currently responsible for the maintenance of these facilities within the City limits, except 1-5 and SR-18, which are currently maintained by WSDOT. Transit service, including several park and ride facilities along the 1- 5 Corridor, is provided by King County Metro. The majority of the street network in the P AA is characteristically rural with asphalt concrete pavement, gravel shoulders, and ditches for drainage purposes. The street network is largely underdeveloped, with many cul-de-sacs and dead- end streets creating insufficient connectivity. Furthermore, a general lack of sidewalks and existing luminaires inhibit pedestrian traffic and present public safety concerns. Luminaires are limited to street intersections along arterial streets and newer subdivisions, with very few mid-block luminaires along arterial streets. Most arterial corridors in the P AA, particularly in the Southeast, lack sidewalks and, in most cases, are poorly lit. As shown in Table 13, sidewalks are a smaller percent of lane road miles. December 2003 42 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan Table 13. Street Inventory Within PAA Inventory Item Redondo East Northeast Subarea Southeast Subarea Subarea All Road Miles* 0.3 miles 46.6 miles 28.9 miles All Paved Road Surfaces, Lane Miles 0.6 93.2 57.3 Curb & Gutter (linear 1,902 252,806 92,206 feet) (-0.4 miles) (~48 miles) (~17miles) Paved Sidewalk, one side 0.4 miles 25.5 miles 12.3 miles (miles) Traffic Signals (EA)** 0 12 2 Luminaires (EA) 10 561 190 Street Signs (EA)*** 37 980 520 Notes: *There are several street clusters in the Study Area for which road logs do not exist, including: private streets (approx. 7 miles), as well as several unmaintained public gravel streets (approx. 7 miles), and in some cases relatively new public asphalt streets (about 1-2 miles), and these are not included in the totals above. * * Based upon City staff review and field confinnation, there appear to be nine signals, two flashing beacons, one fire signal and two traffic signals on SR 161 (currently WSDOT responsibility) that would become the City's responsibility upon annexation. Controllers would need to be replaced to connect to the City's system. *** King County does not inventory street name signs, which would understate the number of signs maintained. Source: King County Roads The largest traffic volumes exist along east/west arterial routes, which provide access to 1...:5. Over half of the arterial roadway miles within the study area have accident rates that are higher than the average King County accident rates. 10.2 Existing and Future Transportation levels of Service The purpose of the intersection level-of-service (LOS) analysis is to identify LOS deficiencies in the City's P AA and then evaluate the improvements that will be needed to meet the City's LOS standard. LOS is a letter designation that describes a range of operating conditions along a roadway segment or at an intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM2000) defines the LOS concept as "a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience." Six grades of LOS are defined for traffic operational analysis. They are given letter designations A through F, with LOS A representing the best range of December 2003 43 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan operating conditions and LOS F the worst. The specific terms in which each level of service is defined vary with the type of transportation facility involved. In general, LOS A describes a free-flowing condition in which individual vehicles in the traffic stream are not affected by the presence of other vehicles. LOS F generally describes a breakdown in operations that occurs when traffic arriving at a point is greater than the facility's capacity to discharge the traffic flow; consequently, vehicle queues develop. Existine LOS For this study, LOS was analyzed at a total of twenty-five (25) intersections with the results presented in Map X. Intersection LOS analyses were performed using Highway Capacity Software Version 4.1 b (HCS2000). Representative intersections in various parts of the P AA that the City and/or County monitor now, or desire to monitor in the future when the roadways are constructed, were analyzed. (Based on information from the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11,2003.) In base year of 2000, the LOS analysis was done by using actual traffic counts between years 2000 to 2002. Analysis indicated that all signalized intersections operated at an acceptable LOS during the PM peak hour and most unsignalized intersections were operating at an acceptable LOS. Exceptions included: S 288th Street at 51st Avenue S S 296th Street at 51 st A venue S LOSF LOSF SR 99 at 16th Avenue S LOSF Future LOS Analysis of the transportation impacts of future land use requires development of future transportation networks. The future land use projection analyzed is based on Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) projections and market analysis, and was developed for the year 2020 (based on information from the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11,2003). In order to determine a future road network, the City provided a future street improvement list by analyzing the Transportation Improvement Programs, comprehensive plans, and near term transportation improvement projects of King County, the Washington State Department of Transportation, and the City of Federal Way. In order to analyze the year 2020 LOS, future intersection volumes were estimated using a calibrated EMME/2 transportation model. On behalf of the City, Mirai Associates developed the EMME/2 model based on the forecasted land use and future transportation improvements described briefly above. The results of the analysis are shown in Map XI (based on information from the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11, 2003). Overall the most congested locations included are those with two-way stop control, and those December 2003 44 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan located in the Military Road corridor. 20-year intersection LOS deficiencies are shown in Map XI. The average vehicle delay and LOS changes are: Congested Locations Military Road S at S 272IKJ Street Military Road S at S 320tllStreet S 27th Street at 55th A venue S S 288th Street at 5 ¡st A venue S Military Road S at S 312th Street Peasley Canyon Way S at S Peasley Canyon Road Military Road S at Peasley Canyon Way S Military Road S at S Star Lake Road (N Jet.) 5151 Avenue S at S 296th Street Military Road S at S 360th Street 28th A venue S at S 360th Street SR 99 at 16th Avenue S Average Vehicle Delay and LOS Change from 42 sec to 116 sec, from 0 to F from 27 see to 73 see, from C to E from 59 see to 195 sec, from E to F from 64 sec to 361 sec, from F to F Exceeds calculable limits (ECL) from 26 see to 351 see, from D to F from 34 see to 559 see, from 0 to F from 39 sec to ECL, from E to F from 106 see to 996 see, from F to F from 22 see to ECL, from C to F from 46 sec to 770 sec, from E to F Exceeds calculable limits (ECL) To determine the additional improvements needed to meet the City's LOS standard, the lowest cost capacity improvement is sought to address identified deficiency and then LOS analysis is conducted with the recommended improvements to insure that all locations will meet the City's LOS standard. With the recommended improvements listed in Table 14 and shown on Map XII, the City's LOS standard is met at all future deficient locations. Table 14. Future LOS and Recommended Improvements 2020 Recommended Improved Intersection LOS Problem Improvements LOS 1. Military Road S @ S 272nd Street F Substantial demand for Add one additional 0 southbound traffic. southbound through lane. 2. Military Road S @ S 320th Street E Substantial demand for Construct an D eastbound right turn eastbound right traffic. turn lane. 3. S 277th Street @ 55th A venue S F The northbound right turn Construct new E demand is queuing while signalized waiting for the eastbound intersection. to westbound through green cycle. 4. S 288th Street @ 51 st Avenue S F Insufficient intersection Construct a left 0 capacity for the A WSC turn lane from (25-sec intersection. westbound to southbound. delay) December 2003 45 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan 2020 Recommended Improved Intersection LOS Problem Improvements LOS Install a traffic D signal. (47-scc delay) 5. Military Road S @ S 312th Strect F Traffic demand on Install a traffic D eastbound approach signal with one exceeds the LOS for eastbound Icft turn TWSC intersections. pocket and one eastbound right turn lane. 6. Peasley Canyon Way S @ S Peasley F Traffic demand on Install a traffic C Canyon Road northbound approach signal. exceeds the LOS for TWSC intersections. 7. Military Road S @ Peasley Canyon F Traffic demand on the Install a traffic B WayS east/west approaches signal at Military exceeds the LOS for Road Sand S TWSC intersections. 340th Street and close the southbound movement on Peasley Canyon Way S from S 340th to Military Road S. 8. Military Road S @ S Star Lake Road (N F Traffic demand on Install a traffic B Jct.) westbound approach signal with an exceeds the LOS for additional TWSC intersections. southbound through lane. 9. 51 st A venue S @ S 296th Street F Traffic demand on Install a traffic B westbound approach signal with exceeds the LOS for additional TWSC intersections. southbound and westbound left turn pockets. 10. Military Road S @ S 360th Street F Traffic demand on the Install a traffic C east/west approaches signal with exceeds the LOS for additional TWSC intersections. northbound and southbound left turn pockets. II. 28th A venue S @ S 360th Street F Insufficient intersection Install a traffic C capacity for the A WSC signal with one intersection. southbound right turn pocket and one southbound through lane. December 2003 46 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan 2020 Recommended Improved Intersection LOS Problem Improvements LOS 12. SR99@ 16thAvenueS/S279thPlaceF Traffic demand on Install a traffic E eastbound approach signal. exceeds the LOS for TWSC intersections. Source: Jones & Stokes 2003 (Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level o(Service Analysis, Južv II. 2003) Notes: A WSC = All Way Stop Controlled; TWSC = Two Way Stop Controlled The total estimated capital cost for roadway improvements in the P AA, existing and future needs to achieve levels of service, is $10,882,000 through 2020, as - .-.. shown in Table 15. About 21 percent of the total capital facility cost estimate is related to existing deficiencies ($2,241,000). Existing deficiencies due to levels of service below E were found at: . S 288th Street at 51 st Avenue S S 296th Street at 51 st Avenue S SR 99 at 16th A venue S . . Of the three subareas in the PAA, the Northeast Subarea has the largest estimated roadway cost at $7,561,000. The largest part of this is the Military Road South project described above. The Southeast Subarea has an estimated roadway capital cost of$3,039,000, with the largest project consisting of a $1,188,000 improvement to the Military Road South/South 360th Street intersection. The Redondo East Subarea has a total roadway cost of $282,000, which consists entirely of the SR 99/16th Avenue South intersection improvement project. Table 15. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Costs for Roadway Improvements Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 lD 1.00 Areawide CIP Programs 0 0 0 0 2.00 Parkway Neighborhood 3.00 Jovita Neighborhood 3.01 Peasley Canyon Way S & S 41 0 234 275 275 Peasley Canyon Rd Intersection Improvement 3.02 Peasley Canyon Way S & Military 158 16 916 1,090 1,090 Rd S Intersection Improvement 4.00 Lakeland Neighborhood 4.01 Military Rd S & S 360th St 162 84 942 1,188 1,188 Intersection Improvement December 2003 47 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 ID 4.02 28th Ave 5 & 5 360th 5t 65 47 374 486 - 486 Intersection Improvement Subtotal Southeast Area 426 147 2,466 3,039 1,188 1,576 275 5.00 North Lake Neighborhood 5.01 5 320th 5t & Military Rd 5 108 165 623 896 896 Intersection Improvement 6.00 Star Lake Neighborhood 6.01 Military Rd 5 & 5 272nd 5t 91 327 528 946 946 Intersection Improvement 6.02 Military Rd S & S Star Lake Rd 41 0 234 275 275 (N Jet) Intersection Improvement 6.03 Military Rd 5 Improvement - 5 305 496 1,770 2,571 0 801 1,770 272nd 5t to 5 Star Lake Road 6.04 5 277th 5t & 55th Ave 5 92 291 531 914 914 Intersection Improvement 7.00 Camelot Neighborhood 7.01 S 288th St & 51st Ave S 66 0 385 451 451 Intersection Improvement 7.02 S 296th St & 51st Ave S 206 109 1,193 1,508 1,508 Intersection Improvement 7.03 S 312nd St Improvement 0 Subtotal Northeast Area 909 1,388 5,264 7,561 2,234 1,747 3,580 8.00 Redondo East Neighborhood 8.01 SR-99 & 16th Ave S Intersection 41 0 241 282 282 Improvement Subtotal Redondo Area 41 0 241 282 282 0 0 Subtotal LOS Projects 1,376 1,535 7,489 10,882 3,704 3,323 3,855 9.00 Southeast Areawide 9.01 Paving 19,200 19,200 6,400 6,400 6,400 9.02 Curb and Gutter 5,400 5,400 1,800 1,800 1,800 9.03 Sidewalk 7,400 7,400 2,400 2,600 2,400 Subtotal Southeast Area 32,000 32,000 10,600 10,800 10,600 10.00 Northeast Areawide 10.01 Paving 13,900 13,900 4,600 4,700 4,600 10.02 Curb and Gutter 6,100 6,100 2,000 2,100 2,000 [0.03 Sidewalk 10,900 10,900 3,600 3,700 3,600 Subtotal Northeast Area 30,900 30,900 10,200 10,500 10,200 11.00 Redondo East Neighborhood 11.01 Curb and Gutter 32 32 IO 12 10 December 2003 48 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Year of Construction and Project Costs in 2002 Dollars (000) Project Capital Project List Design Acquisition Construction Total 2002-2007 2008-2014 2015-2020 ID 11.02 Sidewalk :ì() 39 13 13 13 Subtotal Redondo Area 71 71 23 25 23 Subtotal Road Cross Section 0 0 62,971 62,971 20,823 21,325 20,8B Improvements - -~. Total 1,376 1,535 70,460 73,853 24,527 24,648 24,678 Source: Jones & Stokes. 2003 Notes: Current expenses for similar construction work within the region were reviewed to detem1ine unit prices for broad categories of construction line items and typiealpereentages for standard items. All LOS project costs assume a 30 percent contingency factor. While the focus of the capital cost estimates are the improvements required to ensure the City's intersection LOS would be met, other capital costs may be incurred to bring essentially rural road standards to the City's urban road standards (e.g. curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving of public gravel or public bituminous surface roads). These road cross-section improvements may be made incrementally as new development makes street frontage improvements, or through local improvement districts, or other means. The road cross-section estimates were made in a preliminary fashion for order of magnitude level of analysis, using as a basis data provided by the County on lane miles, feet of sidewalk, etc. in the P AA. The Northeast Subarea and Southeast Subarea have similar road cross-section costs at $30,900,000 and $32,000,000 respectively. The cross-section improvements in Redondo East Subarea total $71,000. Please refer to Table 15. A discussion of public service operating and capital costs and revenues, including Transportation, can be found in Section 12, Public Services and Capital Facilities. 10.3 Transportation Goals and Policies Transportation would be guided by the following goal and policies. Transportation Goal Establish a safe, coordinated, and linked multi modal transportation system serving local and area-wide travel needs. Transportation Policies P AA Trans - 1 Prior to annexations, particularly in the Northeast and Southeast Subareas, the City and County should jointly classify streets in the P AA consistent with Federal, State, and City guidelines, and future roadway usage. Joint City-County street standards should also be established, such as the City of Federal Way standards, a hybrid of standards, or others as determined by the City and County. This may be achieved through an interlocal agreement and any December 2003 49 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan required County Comprehensive Plan amendments. The joint classification system will help ensure a common set of standards are applied as new roadway improvements are proposed and implemented in the P AA, and that the roadways meet City standards upon annexation. The City classification system for the P AA is presented in Map IX. P AA Trans - 2 Joint City and County street standards identified in P AA Trans- I should address: . Property access . Street signs . Street lighting . Pedestrian and bicycle safety . Street widths. P AA Trans - 3 As development proposals are proposed or capital improvements are implemented in the P AA prior to annexation, the City and County should encourage the connection of streets when considering subdivision or street improvement proposals, unless prevented by topographic or environmental constraints. The City and County should limit the use of cul-de- sacs, dead-end streets, loops, and other designs that fOnD barriers to a coordinated transportation network in the community. P AA Trans - 4 The City should work with the County to ensure unifonn maintenance standards for public streets are instituted and conducted by the County until such time as annexation occurs. P AA Trans - 5 Prior to annexation of P AA properties, the County, in consultation with the City, should review high accident locations, and improve street safety and functions focusing efforts at the most critical locations. P AA Trans - 6 To ensure that City and County LOS standards are met as development occurs prior to annexation, the City and County should agree to joint implementation of LOS standards for concurrency. Development applicants should prepare reports that contain dual analysis of the County's Transportation Adequacy Measurement (TAM) and Roadway Segment level of service standards and the City's LOS E intersection standard. P AA Trans - 7 Prior to annexation of the Northeast and Southeast Subareas, a coordinated Capital Improvement Program should be prepared between the City and County to ensure that improvements required to meet levels of service are implemented concurrent with development. P AA Trans - 8 The City and County shall continue to coordinate with park- and-ride and transit service providers in establishing appropriate LOS for the P AA, promoting alternative modes and assisting the achievement of LOS December 2003 50 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan standards. P AA Trans - 9 Prior to annexation of the Northeast and Southeast Subareas, as part of a P AA interlocal agreement the City and County shall establish a regional traffic planning and mitigation payment system. 11 PRIVATE UTILITIES Utilities described in this section include electric (power), natural gas, telephone, and cable. Public utilities are described under Public Services and Capital Facilities. Private utility providers rely on coordination of information such as population and employment forecasts as well as coordination of construction activities, such as street improvements. 11.1 Summary of PAA Inventory Electric Electric utility service for the Federal Way PAA is provided by Puget Sound Energy (PSE). The PSE grid provides a link between the Bonneville Power Administration (BP A) Bulk Transmission System and the local distribution system that connects with customers. Bulk transmission lines supply power into the Federal Way distribution system and provide connections to Tacoma City Light, King, and Pierce Counties. Power is transferred from the transmission system to the PSE local distribution system at distribution sub-stations. There are 115,000 volt, 230,000 volt, and 500,000 volt transmission lines in the Federal Way PAA. Distribution substations transform voltages of 115kV (Kilovolt) or greater to lower voltages of 12 or 34kV. Electric Substations serving the Federal Way PAA include: Marine View; Lakota; Belmor; Christopher; Weyerhaeuser; Starwood; Kitts Comer; and West Campus. Most of the Substations include one or two 25,000 kV A transformers. The load on the substation varies continuously, exactly meeting the demand of the customers. The average PSE residential customer uses approximately 2 kV A per person during peak winter conditions. Commercial loads are highly business specific. (Based on information found in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18, 2002.) As new development occurs or consumer electrical demand increases, future substations will be needed to meet the increased demand. The future substations in the PSE long-range plan include: Federal Way; Dolloff; Twin Lakes; Enchanted; Five Mile Lake; and Killarney. There are planned expansions at Marine View Substation and the development of the Transmission line corridor between Christopher and Marine View. There are also future 115 kV lines planned in the Five Mile Lake area (in Lakeland). (Based on information found December 2003 51 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area InventOlY, Final, March 18, 2002.) Natural Gas Puget Sound Energy provides natural gas to the Federal Way PAA. The PSE customer count in the Federal Way PAA is approximately 5,250. Natural gas is not an essential service, and-therefore PSE is not mandated to serve all areas. Significant lines in or near the P AA include a 12" STW (steel wrap) supply main located in Military Road South and 6" STW located in 288th Street. At this time within the Federal Way P AA, no improvements are planned to existing facilities. Long Range plans for the years 2006-2007 call for installation of a 16" STW High Pressure supply main from Aub~rn Valley to the Star Lake area, and the route is still in the planning stage. (Based on information found in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18, 2002.) Telephone Qwest delivers telecommunication services to the Federal Way planning area as regulated by WUTC. Qwest is required by law to provide adequate telecommunications services on demand. Accordingly, Qwest will provide facilities to accommodate whatever growth pattern occurs within the P AA. Due to advances in technology, additional capacity is easily and quickly added to the system. (Based on information found in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18, 2002.) Wireless Service and Cable Providers Numerous wireless service providers currently serve the City of Federal Way and the P AA. Com cast Cable serves the majority of the City and P AA. (Based on information found in the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Final, March 18, 2002.) 11.2 Private Utilities Goals and Policies Coordination with private utilities is addressed in the following goal and policy. Private Utilities Goal Facilitate provision of electric, natural gas, telecommunication, and cable services to the greater Federal Way community. Private Utilities Policy P AA Utility - 1 The County and City should coordinate with electric, natural gas and telecommunication providers to ensure P AA services support planned growth, meet desired customer service needs, and result in a comparable community system in the greater Federal Way area. December 2003 52 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan 12 PUBLIC SERVICES AND CAPITAL FACILITIES This section provides a summary of current and projected public services and capital facilities in the P AA, addressing local government as well as special district services and facilities. For services that the City would provide if the P AA were to be annexed, an analysis of operating and capital costs and revenues is provided based upon the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Annexation Feasibility Report, December 20a3. 12.1 Inventory of Public Services Likely to Change as a Result of Annexation General Government The City of Federal Way and King County house a variety of operations such as administration, public safety, court services, community/senior centers, and maintenance bases at government facilities. The P AA contains the following County government facility: Lake Dolloff Community Policing Storefront just west of 51 st Avenue S. in the Camelot neighborhood. A private, non-profit senior center operates in the P AA at S. 352nd Street in the Lakeland neighborhood. While this facility has received some King County and City of Federal Way funding, it is not owned or operated by either jurisdiction. Also, the North Lake Improvement Club clubhouse is a non-profit center available for public use, although not owned or operated by the City of Federal Way or King County. The operating costs that could be borne by the City, if it annexed the P AA and provided General Government services, is estimated in Table 17 further below. (Also see Section 8 regarding capital costs for community centers.) Parks and Recreation Please refer to subsections 8 and 12.2. Police Services The King County Sheriff provides police protection services to the P AA. The P AA is served by Precinct 3, George Sector, with its headquarters in Maple Valley. However, there is a local storefront police station near Lake Dolloff in the Camelot neighborhood. The substation is not manned for general public visitors, and one must call and leave a message. Although calls for service in the P AA have decreased by five percent between 1999 and 2000, during this time period the number of traffic citations and traffic accident events increased by 17 and 12 percent respectively. As of 2000, the crime rate of 35.26 per 1,000 population was nearly equal to the crime rate for the December 2003 53 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan countywide area patrolled by the Sheriffs Office. According to the King County Executive's Proposed 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program, there are no new proposed or expanded capital facilities in the Federal Way P AA. At the time of incorporation, the City contracted with the King County Sheriffs Department for police services. In the spring of 1995, the City decided to terminate its contract relationship with King County and form its own police department. The City's Public Safety Department began limited service on September 16, 1996, and was fully operational on October 16, 1996. Federal Way's Public Safety Department could be expanded at some time in the future so that it could effectively provide services to the P AA. (A comparison of levels of service in the County and City can be found in Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11,2003.) State laws require and establish procedures for the lateral transfer to a City of qualified county sheriff's office employees who would otherwise be laid off as a result of the annexation of unincorporated territory into that city (RCW 35.13.360 to 400). The City would not be required to put all transferring employees on the police department payroll. It is within the City's discretion to detennine what staffing provides an adequate level of law enforcement service. Estimates of public safety operating costs to the City should annexation occur are provided in Table 17 below. Solid Waste The King County Department of Natural Resources, Solid Waste Division, operates King County's transfer and disposal system comprised of a regional landfill, eight transfer stations, and two rural drop boxes for residential and non- residential self-haul customers and commercial haulers. The closest waste transfer station to the PAA and the City of Federal Way is in the City of Algona. Unincorporated areas of King County are served by private garbage collection companies, which receive oversight through the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC). While Federal Way Disposal serves the City of Federal Way, local haulers within the PAA operate within two service areas: Allied Service Area (SeaTac Disposal) and Waste Management and Allied Service Area (Sea- Tac Disposal and RST Disposal), with the dividing line at about S. 300th Street. In the event of annexation, the City may decide to contract for solid waste collection or undertake solid waste collection itself. However, in accordance with State Law, the holder of the franchise or permit in the annexing area may continue to operate for the remaining term of the original franchise or permit, or for seven years, whichever time period is shorter (RCW 35A.14.900). In the Parkway neighborhood, the Puyallup/Kit Corner Landfill is sited southeast of the 1-5 and SR-18 interchange. This landfill was closed in the mid-1960's prior December 2003 54 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan to existing regulations requiring extensive environmental controls. Environmental systems are being monitored and maintained, and gas extraction systems are in place. Estimates of solid waste operating costs to the City should annexation occur are provided in Table 17 below. Surface Water See Subsections 9 and 12.2. Transportation See Subsection 10 and 12.2. 12.2 Summary of Fiscal Impacts and Strategies Fiscal Impacts Summary The City of Federal Way would experience a significant negative fiscal impact on its operating budget if the Southeast and Northeast Major Subareas (Southeast: Lakeland, Jovita, Parkway neighborhoods; Northeast: Star Lake, Camelot, and North Lake neighborhoods) were annexed to the City and the City used the same revenue sources and rates, and provided the same level of services as it provides to the residents and businesses in the current boundaries of the City. The annual deficit would be just under $3.6 million ($8.2 million cost; $4.6 million revenue). The cost of providing the City's levels of service in the PAA would exceed revenues from the P AA by 78 percent annually. The net operating revenue (or net costs) presented here represent the gap between operating revenues generated in each of the PAAs under the City's 2003 revenue structure and the costs of extending 2003 levels of City services to the same areas. In order to present a full picture of operating impacts, this presentation combines fiscal impacts across a number of disparate City Funds. The City would undoubtedly continue City policy that Surface Water Management (SWM) costs would be covered by Surface Water Fees within the structure of the Surface Water Enterprise Fund. Such a strategy would require increased SWM fees and/or decreased levels of SWM services by $538,000 (the difference between estimated SWM operating costs ($823,000) given current service levels and estimated revenues ($285,000). The remaining $3.0 million gap, then, would be bridged through some combination of other strategies. Another way of understanding the fiscal impact of the approximately $3.4 million deficit is to see how it compares to the combined revenue of the City of Federal Way and the combined Northeast/Southeast PAA subareas. If Federal Way and the Northeast and Southeast P AA subareas are viewed as a single City of over 105,000 population, the annual deficit of $3.6 million equals six percent of the combined operating revenue. It would be like running a business that loses six December 2003 55 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan percent every year. In addition, the City of Federal Way would experience major costs for capital improvements in the P AA totaling over $48.3 million. Dedicated capital revenue is anticipated to be 532.0 million through the year2020, leaving an unfunded cost of S ¡ 6.3 million (which averages $0.9 million per year through 2020). As noted for operating costs above, City policy for surface water (and other enterprise activities) is to cover costs with fee revenue. Assuming that the City would use enterprise policy to cover the $4.7 million cost of stormwater capital, the remaining deficit would be $11,564,520 (which is an annual average of $642,473). In addition, the City will undoubtedly receive mitigation payments or impact fees from development in the P AA, which were not possible to estimate at this time, but they would reduce the size of the deficit. Tables 16 to 21 provide the cost and revenue information supporting the conclusions above: Table 16. Operating Revenues Generated, by P AA (2003) Northeast Southeast PAA PAA Redondo Total Property Tax $947,000 $699,000 $24,000 $1,670,000 State Shared Revenues $365,000 $264,000 $8,000 $637,000 Sales Tax - Criminal Justice $246,000 $178,000 $5,000 $429,000 Local Retail Sales Tax $107,000 $173,000 $79,000 $359,000 Utility Taxes (O&M) * $196,000 $135,000 $6,544 $337,544 Surface Water Fees $159,000 $116,000 $10,000 $285,000 Fines and Forfeits $106,000 $115,000 $6,000 $227,000 Building Permit Fees $121,000 $90,000 $7,000 $218,000 Vehicle License Fee - - - - Franchise Fees $102,000 $74,000 $2,000 $178,000 Solid Waste Revenues $41,000 $41,000 $1,000 $83,000 Development Services $39,000 $27,000 $1,000 $67,000 Fees Recreation Fees $23,000 $33,000 $500 $56,500 Zoning Fees $7,000 $5,000 $1,000 $13,000 Gambling Tax $13,000 - $16,000 $29,000 Business License Fees $4,000 $3,000 $1,000 $8,000 Total $2,476,000 $1,953,000 $168,044 $4,597,044 Revenues per Resident $201 $219 $646 $214 Source: ECONorthwest analysis. December 2003 56 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan Table 17. Operating Costs by Department by Potential Annexation Area (2003) Northeast Southeast PAA PAA Redondo Total City Council $26,000 $26,000 $1,000 $53,000 City Manager $193,000 $204,000 $10,000 $407,000 Community Development $299,000 $22 I ,000 $13,300 $533,300 Law $129,000 $136,000 $6,000 $271,000 Management Services * $182,000 $187,000 $7,000 $376,000 Parks & Recreation $55,000 $406,000 $1,000 $462,000 Public Safety $1,651,000 $1,780,000 $98,000 $3,529,000 Public Works $1,457,000 $1,038,000 $21,000 $2,516,000 Total $3,992,000 $3,998,000 $157,300 $8,147,300 Costs per Resident $325 $449 $605 $380 Source: ECONorthwest analysis. Table 18. Annual Net Operating Revenues (or Operating Cost) of Annexation, by PAA (2003) Northeast Southeast PAA PAA Redondo Total $2,476,000 $1,953,000 Operating Revenues $168,044 $4,597,044 Operating Cost $3,992,000 $3,998,000 $157,300 $8,147,300 Net Revenues or Cost -$1,516,000 -$2,045,000 $10,344 * -$3,550,256 Costs oer Resident -$123 -$230 $41 -$166 Source: ECONorthwest analysis. * Given the uncertainties surrounding estimates of costs and revenues for a small area like Redondo, the reported net revenue of $1 0,344 for the Redondo area could be viewed as essentially equal to zero. Table 19 Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Capital Revenue to 2020 Capital Revenues Northeast Southeast Redondo All Subareas Real Estate Excise Taxes $ 300,000 $ 222,000 $ 7,000 $ 530,000 Utility Taxes (Capital) 694,000 480,000 20,000 1,194,000 Annual Total $ 995,000 $ 702,000 $ 27,000 $1,724,000 CIP Planning Horizon (years 2002-2020) 18 18 18 18 2020 Total of Annual Revenue 17,910,000 12,636,000 486,000 31,032,000 December 2003 57 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan Capital Revenues Northeast Southeast Redondo All Subareas Grants for Roads 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 2020 Revenue Total 18,910,000 12,636,000 486,000 32,032,000 Source: ECONorthwcst 2003 Table 20. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Estimated Future Capital Costs Redondo Area Wide Northeast Southeast East TOTAL Subarea Subarea Subarea Parks and Recreation $-0- $22,565,346 $9,564,412 $584,762 $32,714,520 Roads: Level of Service -0- 7,561,000 3,039,000 282,000 $10,882,000 Surface Water 1,067,000* 1,074,000 2,578,000 -0- $4,719,000 Total $1,067,000 $31,200,346 $15,181,412 $866,762 $48,315,520 Sources: Jones & Stokes, Henderson Young & Company, TetraTech/KCM, Inc., 2003 * Area wide capital programs include a joint P AA stonn drain system inventory and comprehensive plan, and major maintenance of ditches and other stonnwater facilities. Table 21. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Estimated Net Capital Revenues Northeast Southeast Redondo Area Wide Subarea Subarea Subarea TOTAL Capital Revenue $18,910,000 $12,636,000 $486,000 $ 32,032,000 Capital Cost 1,067,000 31,200,346 15,181,412 866,762 48,315,520 Net Revenue (1,067,000) (12,290,346) (2,545,412) (380,762) (16,283,520) Sources: ECONorthwest, Jones & Stokes, Henderson Young & Company, TetraTech/KCM, Inc., 2003 Implementation Strategies To address the fiscal impact the Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Annexation Feasibility Report, December 2003 identifies six categories of strategies that could be pursued to address the significant negative fiscal impacts of annexation, as follows, without a priority order: 1. State and County Support: With this option, the City could indicate that its ability to annex the Southeast and Northeast Subareas is contingent upon the State of Washington and/or King County providing new resources to offset the significant cost of such annexations. Examples could include a new local option sales tax per State Law that authorizes King County to submit such a tax for voter approval, State December 2003 58 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan grants, and unexpènded County impact fees being provided to the City. The County's ability to continue to service urban unincorporated islands has decreased over the last several years, and the County has been cutting back services. Accordingly, in August 2003, it was reported that King County will offer a total of $1 0 million to a number of cities that annex unincorporated areas in their P AAs. Details were not announced, and will depend on the County's budget decisions. 2. Local Taxpayers: With this option, the City could use one or more general taxes to have all taxpayers in Federal Way and the combined annexation area share in paying the annual operating deficit. The City could ask voters to approve long-term debt in the form of a general obligation bond that is used to build capital improvements. Of particular interest are enterprise funds. Like many cities, Federal Way has a policy that costs of enterprise funds, such as Surface Water Management and Solid Waste are to be covered by user fees. Such a strategy would require increased fees and/or decreased levels of services. Federal Way could increase user fees throughout the City and P AA for its stormwater utility and/or solid waste utility and use the proceeds to offset the increased cost of providing those services in the PAA. 3. Tax Base Expansion: A long-term strategy for Federal Way could be to increase City revenue by increasing the tax base in the P AA and/or in the City limits. Some businesses, like automobile dealerships, generate significantly more tax revenue than the cost of the public services they receive. These strategies could be pursued independently by the City of Federal Way, but King County could make annexation more attractive if it were to take the lead in rezoning selected parcels in the P AA in accordance with provisions of the approved Subarea Plan and assisting in the economic development strategies to develop those areas. A caveat would be that the City of Federal Way and the PAAs currently have vacant and underdeveloped land to absorb decades of anticipated commercial growth. 4. Special Districts: One strategy to generate revenue to pay for Federal Way's level of service in the annexation area would be to create a special district and charge a property tax levy in that district. Washington law allows the creation of limited special purpose districts for a number of purposes, such as roads, parks, transportation, and "local improvements." Voter approval is required to create special districts that have taxing authority. Property owner approval is required to create special districts that use special assessments. There is some risk associated with using special districts as a strategy to pay for providing urban levels of service the P AA. A vote on creating a special taxing district would occur subsequent to an annexation vote. If voters approve annexation, but do not approve the creation of the district(s), the City December 2003 59 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan would be left with insufficient money to provide its level of service. 5. Reduced or Phased Levels of Service: Another way for the City to address the difference in levels of service between Federal Way and the County wouÍd be to pennanently provide a lower level of service for one or more services, either broadly citywide or only within specific areas. A second strategy for addressing the difference in level of service would be to phase-in the increases in level of service in the annexation area. Phasing would reduce costs during the transition, and it would provide Federal Way with time to recruit and hire personnel an'd acquire facilities and equipment. However, eventually, phased levels of service will grow to equal the standards achieved by the City of Federal Way. When that occurs, service levels will be the same throughout the City, and the City will experience the full fiscal impacts of those levels of service. A variation on phased or reduced levels of service could include alternative service delivery strategies or customized strategies for specific neighborhoods tailored to the needs or characteristics of the PAA location. For example, crime prevention programs could vary by neighborhood depending on the type residential dwellings, commercial uses, and previous crime rate statistics. 6. Phased Annexation: This strategy would involve annexing those areas that are financially self-supporting first and then annexing other areas later, perhaps in conjunction with other strategies to improve fiscal impact of these subsequent annexations. Phased annexation based on fiscal impacts could be accomplished by annexing Redondo first because it has no operating cash deficit. The Northeast P AA subarea, or portions thereof, could be annexed next because its operating costs exceed revenues by 61 percent. Last to be annexed could be the Southeast P AA subarea, because its costs are estimated to be more than double the revenue it would generate (i.e., the deficit is 105 percent). Phasing can also be accomplished by smaller areas, such as community subareas. For example, if community subareas were annexed in order of their fiscal impact, from least to most net operating cost, the following would be the phasing sequence: Northlake, Lakeland, Star Lake, Jovita, Camelot, and Parkway. If other Implementation Strategies are considered and employed to detennine phasing for annexation. the order might be different than the preceding list. It should be noted that phasing annexation emphasizes differences among the areas, and misses the opportunity to mitigate the apparent differences among areas by taking them all at the same time, thus effectively averaging the "highs" and "lows" of both revenues and costs. December 2003 60 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan Some implementation strategies may be suitable to different portions of the P AA while others may not be. Study of the altematives prior to or at the time of annexation requests would be warranted. 12.3 Services Unlikely to Change as a Result of Annexation: In the event of annexation, some services currently being provided in the P AA through special districts will not change. The current service providers, levels of service, or costs of services including fire protection, library, schools, water and wastewater will remain unchanged. However, it is important that the City and service providers coordinate planning efforts to match services and facilities with the current and future population and employment levels. Each of the services are summarized below based on the March 18,2002 PAA Inventory. Fire Services The Federal Way Fire Department provides service to the City of Federal Way and most of the surrounding unincorporated area in the Federal Way PAA. However, the Fire Department is not part of the City of Federal Way government. The Department was formed in 1980 from a series of mergers, which united several smaller fire districts in the area, some of which had been in existence since 1946. The resulting boundary encompasses some 34 square miles and has an estimated population of over 100,000. Services provided by the Federal Way Fire Department include fire suppression, fire prevention (building inspection and public information), emergency medical, and communications center operation for 911 emergency calls. Emergency medical response calls or service make up a majority of the calls for the Department. The PAA is served by four of the Department's six stations (Map VIII). One of these stations is located outside of the P AA, within the Redondo area. The other fire stations serving the P AA are located within the Lakeland and Camelot community subareas. The fire station in the Camelot area lies on the border of the Camelot and North Lake community sub areas. A 1996 Des Moines annexation (W oodmonURedondo) could result in area currently served by the Federal Way Fire Department to be served by Fire District 26 if either party should give the required 12-month notice to eliminate the contract allowing the Federal Way Fire Department to continue providing service. Ifthe contract is eliminated, District 26 would take ownership of Station 66. The Federal Way Fire Department has purchased property at South 288th and Interstate 5 as a contingency should they need to replace Station 66. This would accommodate the building of a new station that is more centrally located in the north end of the City. This realignment of stations, response areas, and revenues would require closure of Station 65 (4966 South 298th). Both Stations 65 and 66 serve portions of the Federal Way PAA. December 2003 61 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan F or the City and P AA Planning efforts, the City has worked closely with the Department in reviewing the Fire District Master Plan, which complies with the GMA. The Department's Master Plan identifies the new facilities the Department will need to continue providing service as its service area grows. The City included the Department's new facilities requirements and cost and revenue estimates in the City's Capital Facilities chapter. Library Services Library services are provided by King County. There are no public libraries inside the P AA, but there are six libraries of different sizes serving residents of the P AA including: Algona-Pacific Library - 5,250 square feet (medium) 255 Ellingson Road Auburn Library - 15,000 square feet (resource) 1102 Auburn Way South Federal Way 320th Library- 10,000 square feet (large) 848 S. 320th St. Federal Way Regional Library - 25, 000 square feet (regional) 34200 1st Way S. Kent Regional - 22,500 square feet (regional) 212 2nd Avenue N. Woodmont Library - 5,250 square feet (medium) 26809 Pacific Highway South King County Library System (KCLS) plans for capital projects, including expansions, depend on the KCLS Board determining whether they wish to propose a bond issue to King County voters and whether it passes. The KCLS staff and Board have discussed many possible projects for such a bond issue and some of the libraries serving the P AA have been included. However, there are no capital plans or funds to provide library services in the P AA at this time. Schools/Education Probably more than any other special district, a school district provides an area with a sense of community. The Federal Way School District #210 (as outlined on Map XIV) extends from the county line south to South 252nd west of 1-5 and South 232nd Street, east ofl-5 to the north, and for the most part along the edge of the plateau to the east. A school district provides a common thread, be it through school activities such as organized sports, or through voting during elections. City staff meets regularly with School District #210 administrators to discuss December 2003 62 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan growth management and school development issues. The District primarily serves students in the Cities of Federal Way, Des Moines, and Kent, and unincorporated King County. The District administration has indicated in these meetings that they would prefer to work with one jurisdiction as the District attempts to anticipate growth and develop plans for new school facilities. Seven schools are located in the P AA, including five elementary schools, one junior high school, and one high school (as outlined on Map XIV). Aside from Thomas Jefferson High School, all schools within and serving the P AA have some student dcmand beyond the building capacity, rcquiring the use of portable classrooms. Water and Wastewater The Lakehaven Utility District and Highline Water District provide water service to properties within the P AA. As indicated on Map XV, the current Lakehaven Utility District boundary is generally bordered on the south by the Pierce/King County line, on the east by the Green River Valley, and on the west by Puget Sound. The Lakehaven Utility District's northern boundary is generally bordered by South 272nd Street with a narrow strip extending along Puget Sound to South 252nd Street. Maps contained in the Lakehaven District's water system comprehensive plan describe an extensive system of wells, storage tanks, and distribution mains. The water distribution infrastructure is sufficient to provide water to virtually all of the Lakehaven Utility District. The Highline Water District water service area boundary encompasses most of the PAA Star Lake community subarea and parts of the City of Federal Way (Map XV). Both the 1998 Lakehaven Utility District Comprehensive Water System Plan and 2002 Highline Water District Capital Improvement Plan have identified the following water quality and service goals and objectives: maintain their water systems and water quality to the highest level of service and at least the level required by applicable regulations; participate in the conservation efforts to maximize existing water supply resources and develop new water resources; and install new water distribution systems as necessary to serve the existing and future populations within their Districts. Both Districts have existing rate structures and capability to ensure this level of service. Wastewater systems in the P AA include both septic and sanitary sewer systems. Sanitary sewer service is available in several areas outside the City limits including the Camelot/ Star Lake area, north of Lake Dolloff, Redondo, Woodmont, a small area east of 1-5 and south of Kitts Corner Road, and portions of the Weyerhaeuser Corporate campus east of 1-5. See Map XVI. Relevant to the P AA, the Lakehaven Utility District plans estimate that sewer December 2003 63 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan service will be extended to the east-central area of the District in the near future and the area is projected to reach its target population in the Year 2007, based on the Lakehaven Sewer Master Plan which estimated growth based upon City of Federal Way traffic analysis zone growth projections available in approximately 1999. The number of onsite septic systems throughout the District was estimated to be 7,500. The Utility District plan assumptions are that 50 percent of the onsite systems will be replaced with sanitary sewer connections by the year 2017. Under ultimate development conditions, it is anticipated that all areas that could feasibly and economically be served would be served. The City of Federal Way's responsibility with regard to the water and wastewater systems will be limited to updating the FWCP in future years in accordance with the City's regular planning efforts, and providing development applications to the Lakehaven Utility District and Highline Water District for their input as part of the City's Development Review Committee process. 12.4 Public Services and Capital Facilities Goals and Policies The provision of public services and capital facilities would be guided by the following goal and policies. Public Services and Capital Facilities Goal Provide effective, efficient, and quality capital facilities and services at the level necessary to meet community needs and support allowed growth. Public Services and Capital Facilities Policies In addition to Governance and Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, the following policies are proposed: P AA CapFac - 1 Prior to annexation, the City, in conjunction with King County, should develop and maintain an inventory of capital facilities in the P AA. As new infonnation becomes available, supplementary inventories should be completed for surface water facilities and roadway improvements to bridge gaps in infonnation identified in the Final Potential Annexation Area Inventory, Ci~y of Federal Way, March 18, 2002. P AA CapFac - 2 City and County plans should address the P AA to ensure that systems are reviewed comprehensively, and in order to support desired annexation phasing. P AA CapFac - 3 Through an interlocal agreement prior to annexation, shared City-County capital facility maintenance standards should be implemented. Standards, funding, and practices should seek to avoid maintenance deferrals prior to annexation. Maintenance standards should be consistent with approved functional plans for transportation, stonnwater, parks, and other systems that would become a part of the City system upon annexation. December 2003 64 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan P AA CapFac - 4 The City should allow for a variety of service delivery or revenue enhancement optionsto increase the feasibility of annexation. Based on the P AA Annexation Feasibility StucÚ', these options may include, but are not limited to: a. State of Washington and/or King County providing new resources to offseuhe significant cost of annexation, through such options as New Local Option Sales Tax, State Grants, unspent County Impact Fees, County monetary incentives to annex, or others. b. The County or City posing to voters general obligation bonds or general taxes. c. The County or City proposing to create special limited districts in P AAs to pay for specific costs. d. Tax base expansion per Policy LU-6. e. Increase in fees for enterprise funds such as surface water management or the solid waste program. f. When considering annexation proposals, the City could provide a lower level of service for one or more services. The reduction could be City-wide (e.g. lower park standards) or just in the PAAs (e.g. lower roadway pavement rating in the newly annexed neighborhoods). g. When considering annexation proposals, the City could explore alternative service delivery strategies or customized strategies for specific neighborhoods tailored to the needs or characteristics of the P AA location. h. The City could address the difference in County and City levels of service by phasing-in the increases in level of service in the annexation area. 1. The City could annex those areas that are financially self-supporting first and then annex other areas in conjunction with other strategies to improve fiscal impact of these subsequent annexations, such as identified in "a" to "h" above. P AA CapFac-5 To avoid City assumption of nonconforming infrastructure, a coordinated Capital Improvement Program should be prepared between the City and County. Such a program should be developed prior to annexation, particularly of the Northeast and Southeast subareas, to ensure that improvements required to meet levels of service are implemented concurrent with new development. When considering annexation proposals that have significant existing nonconforming infrastructure, the City should consider service delivery and revenue enhancement options identified in Policy P AA CapFac-4. December 2003 65 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan 13 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GMA requires public participation in the adoption and amendment of Comprehensive Plans and Development Regulations, including the preparation of Subarea Plans like the Federal Way P AA Subarea Plan. Public participation efforts in the development of the Federal Way PAA Subarea Plan are addressed in prior sections of this report, and have included public meetings, open houses, and various means of advertisements. Once adopted, the approved P AA Subarea Plan will require some implementing activities including interlocal agreements, and additional capital planning. Implementing activities depending on the nature of the activity may result in additional opportunities for public input in accordance with State and local laws. Also, if the Subarea Plan is amended in the future which is allowed typically on an annual basis by the GMA, other public participation efforts would be needed. Finally, the annexation process would require public notification and participation efforts pursuant to State laws. 13.1 Public Participation Goal and Policies The following goal and policy would help direct public participation efforts in the PAA. Public Participation Goal Actively seek public involvement in PAA planning efforts. Public Participation Policy PAA Pub-l Consistent with Washington State law, the City of Federal Way recognizes annexation as a process which requires and benefits from public participation. As the City is the designated future municipal service provider to the P AA, the City should inform P AA residents, property owners, and business owners of City activities and invite participation from P AA residents, property owners, and business owners through the following efforts: a. Encourage City staff and elected officials to regularly attend civic and community organization meetings. b. Seek broad representation on boards, commiSSIOns, and advisory groups. c. Prior to action on City plans and regulations, seek and integrate public input through public workshops, meetings and hearings. December 2003 66 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan 14 GOVERNANCE AND INTER-JURISDICTIONAL COORDINATION In accordance with the provisions of the GMA, new development should occur in designated urban growth areas, and urban services should primarily be provided by cities. In consultation with the County, a P AA for Federal Way has been designated in which it is anticipated that the City would ultimately provide services as property owners and citizens elect to annex. This will require a transition from County governance to City governance. Additionally, GMA requires coordination between land use and services/capital planning, such as between the City of Federal Way, neighboring cities, special districts and the County, for which the Countywide Planning Policies help provide a regional framework. While some servic~ providers would not change, such as special districts including the Lakehaven Utility District, Highline Water District, Federal Way Fire Department, and Federal Way School District, other services provided by the County including police and corrections services, surface water management, land use and building permitting, human services, and others would change. (A comparison of services and levels of service between the two agencies is identified in Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis, July 11,2003; a detailed discussion of fiscal impacts is found in the Annexation Feasibility Study, December 2003.) Section 12 provides strategies to minimize negative impacts to public services and facilities impacted negatively by annexation. 14.1 Governance/lnterjurisdictional Goals and Policies Governance and interjurisdictional coordination would be directed by the following goal and policies. Governance/lnterjurisdictional Coordination Goal Coordinate PAA planning efforts with other neighboring jurisdictions and agencies. Governance/lnterjurisdictional Coordination Policies P AA Gov - 1 The City shall coordinate with King County to ensure service provision and land development prior to City annexation is consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan. Methods to allow for coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and King County to: a. Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees, and SEP A mitigation consistent with the P AA Subarea Plan; and December 2003 67 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan b. Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards, and capital facility implementation consistent with the P AA Subarea Plan. P AA Gov - 2 Through regional planning efforts, the County and City should ensure P AA plans are compatible with neighboring jurisdictions, including ~ing and Pierce Counties, and the Cities of Algona, Auburn, Edgewood, Kent, Milton, and Pacific. PAA Gov - 3 Coordinated planning efforts between the City, County, Lakehaven Utility District, Highline Water District, Puget Sound Energy, Federal Way School District and Federal Way Fire Department should continue to assure managed growth supportive of the P AA land use, annexation phasing, and service delivery objectives. 15 ANNEXATION For purposes of efficient services, coordinated land planning and development, and unity between economically and socially related areas, annexation may be desired by citizens, property owners, and the City. As noted above, the GMA provides for coordinated urban growth area planning between counties and cities with the intent that urban and urbanizing areas ultimately be served by municipalities. In the GMA framework, annexations may occur only within a jurisdiction's designated PAA. By addressing its city limits and PAA in its Comprehensive Plan, the City is responding to the GMA framework to manage growth, provide efficient services, and meet community needs in the broader Federal Way community. There are currently four methods of annexation applicable to the Federal Way PAA. . The Election Method, Initiated by Ten Percent Petition, is initiated by the collection of signatures from qualified electors in the area proposed for annexation equal to ten percent of the number of voters in the last general election in that area. This method would require an election by the residents of the area being considered for annexation. This method could be used to annex portions of or all of the P AA at a time. The Election Method, Initiated by Resolution, may be initiated by City Council resolution. This method would require an election by the residents of the area being considered for annexation. This method could be used to annex portions of or all of the P AA at a time. . December 2003 68 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan . In May 2003, legislation became effective which adopted a new "Petition Method of Annexation" designed to overcome the State Supreme Court's findings of constitutional defects in the State's previous petition method. Under the new law, the annexation petition must be signed by property owners (owning a majority of the area) and by registered voters (a majority in the area). If there are no registered voters (vacant, commercial, or industrial property, or property that has residents but no registered voters), then only owners of a majority of the area need sign. This method could be used to annex portions of or all of the P AA at a time. In July 2003, another "Island Method of Annexation" became effective. It allows a legislative body to initiate an annexation process for an urban island of territory by adopting a resolution commencing negotiations for an interlocal agreement between the initiating city and the county. At least 60 percent of the is land must be contiguous to one or more cities. A public hearing is required by the county and the city separately or jointly, before the agreement is executed. Following adoption and execution of the agreement by both legislative bodies, the city legisla tive body is to adopt an ordinance providing for the annexation of the territory described in the agreement. Generally, a petition or public vote is not required. The method has a vote requirement if property owners reject annexation through obtaining a certain number of petition signatures. This Island method could be used to annex all of the Redondo East, and/or all of the Northeast and Southeast P AAs as a whole. It may be possible to use the Island method to annex portions of the Major Subareas. . As identified in Section 12, no individual strategy or combination of strategies will make annexation feasible for the Major or Community Level Subareas (other than Redondo), without significant sacrifices or costs to the City in the form of reduced levels of service or financial impacts to citizens. Annexation of smaller areas involve portions of the cost of the entire P AA; therefore requests for small area annexations should be reviewed in the context of the annexation strategies and policies in Section 12, as well as the policies below. 15.1 Annexation Goals and Policies Annexation Goals Provide a framework for processing annexation requests. Annexation Policies P AA Annex - 1 The City should give priority consideration to annexation proposals that are financially self-sufficient or those where the fiscal impact can be improved through annexation strategies such as those identified in Policy P AA CapFac-4. As areas become feasible for annexation, such areas may be prioritized for annexation in accordance with the following: December 2003 69 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan a. Priority criteria should include: . Neighborhood willingness to annex; Land use developability where urban densities may be achieved, rate of growth indicating City oversight of growing area would ensure compatible development with City goals and requirements, and other similar land use factors; . . Ability to provide a b"alance in costs and revenues to the City; City's ability to provide appropriate levels of service; The annexation include~eas with regionally serving infrastructure that meets City of Federal Way Level-of-Service (LOS) standards. Infrastructure examples may include parks and recreation facilities, arterial roadways, regional surface water detention facilities, etc. Annexation areas containing nonconforming infrastructure should have sufficient planning and funding mechanisms in place to assure existing LOS deficiencies are addressed. Sufficient planning mechanisms may include affected areas being addressed in capital facility plans. Sufficient funding mechanisms may include anticipated utility tax revenues from the affected area, and the establishment of a Local Improvement District to minimize any gaps in tax revenues. Logical and reasonable service areas based on Policies P AA Annex -2 and PAA Annex-3. . . . b. Annexation of the geographic subareas may be phased over several years. P AA Annex - 2 The City should process annexation requests in accordance with review criteria. Review criteria should include: a. The proposal meets the priority criteria of P AA Annex - I. b. Annexations are an appropriate size. Appropriate size means an area that warrants the staff time and expense involved in processing annexation requests and complies with the goals of the GMA and the CWPPs. c. Annexations generally should not have or create abnormally irregular boundaries. d. The annexation must, to the greatest extent possible, preserve natural neighborhoods and communities. e. The annexation proposal should use physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours, including meeting provisions ofPAA Annex-3; December 2003 70 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PM Proposed Final Subarea Plan f. The annexation proposal should create and/or preserve logical service areas, including meeting provisions of P AA Annex-3. P AA Annex 3: The City will use, but may not be limited to, the following factors in determining the specific location of an annexation proposal boundary: a. The annexation boundary, where appropriate, shculd adjust any impractical or irregular boundaries created in the past. b. The annexation boundary should provide a contiguous and regular boundary with current City limits. c. The annexation boundary, where appropriate, should be drawn along property and/or existing or future right-of-way boundaries. Annexation boundaries, where possible, should not be drawn along right-of-way centerlines. d. P AA roadways contiguous to a proposed annexation area should not be included within the proposed annexation boundary, unless the roadways are contiguous to current City limits. e. When a proposed annexation is located in the vicinity of a P AA King County surface water management facility, the City Public Works Department should evaluate the facility and the water basins it serves to determine whether the boundary should be modified to include the public facility. f. When a proposed annexation is located in the vicinity of a P AA public recreation facility, the City Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department should evaluate the financial feasibility of modifying the annexation boundary to include the public facility. g. When a proposed annexation includes portions of a natural lake, the annexation boundary should be modified to include or exclude the entire lake area from the proposed annexation. h. When a proposed annexation is located in the vicinity ofa PAA special purpose district facility (i.e. school, fire station, etc.), the City should consult with the respective district regarding modifying the boundary to include the special purpose district facility. P AA Annex - 4 Upon annexation, properties shall be required to assume FWCP designations and zoning as found in the adopted P AA Subarea Plan (Maps VII-I and VII-2). a. The adopting ordinance for the pre-annexation plan and zoning shall specify the time interval following an annexation during which the ordinance adopting the pre-annexation plan and zoning, must remain in effect before it may be amended by the City. December 2003 71 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PAA Proposed Final Subarea Plan b. Any amendment to the pre-annexation land use plan that is adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan is subject to the general GMA limitation that the comprehensive plan may be amended no more frequently than once a year, unless exceptions are met. P AA Annex - 5 Where appropriate, the City and/or County should allow development agreements in the P AA that are consistent with the approved Subarea Plan. P AA Annex - 6 The City will require owners of land annexing into Federal Way to assume their proportion of existing City bonded indebtedness. P AA Annex - 7 The City and County will work with affected neighborhoods upon annexation to provide a smooth transition from King County to City of Federal Way administration. P AA Annex - 8 The City should establish departmental service needs prior to major annexations through a fiscal impact analysis. As revenues from each annexation area are collected, increase City services to maintain current citywide levels of service or determine other level of service phasing, reduction, or customization as identified in Policy P AA CapFac-4. P AA Annex - 9 The City should evaluate the unincorporated lands beyond the P AA boundaries, including but not limited to, the Browns Point and Dash Point areas of Pierce County and the southwest King County "gap" area, that may be appropriate to include within the P AA. The City should work with King County and Pierce County and neighboring jurisdictions regarding the potential addition of any lands to the Federal Way P AA. 16 TECHNICAL REFERENCES TO THE SUBAREA PLAN The following technical references are available under separate cover: A. City o{ Federal Way PotentÏal Annexation Area InventOlY, Final, March 18, 2002. B. "Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Level of Service Analysis," July 11, 2003. C. "Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Land Use Analysis Compilation," March 5, 2003. D. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Annexation FeasÏbilÏ(v Study, December 2003. December 2003 72 ---..., .3,. j ~;;;iìi-¡ c.._) I! I --_.r- , Auburn I ¡ ,... --f-~ ~. . .uf .- I 1',,"; ~- J -..I ! . , J - . I . J , . , . ,..~ . .~ &' i j M I 110ft .." ,f/ .io./ j,~/ _~r -..---..- City of Federal Way- Potential Annexation Area Federal Way PAA Legend: D Federal Way D Algona D Auburn D Des Moines D Kent D Milton D D D D D Kent, P.A.A. D D Pacific Federal Way, P A.A. Algona. P.AA Auburn, P AA. Milton, P.A.A. Pacific, P.A.A. VIcinity Map 0 Scale: 112 Mile ~ N ~ Map Date: December, 2003 Cltv at Federal W~. 33&0 First Wæ¡ S, Federal WI'¡. WA 9&003 {258} 661-4000 WNN.ci .fedllral-my.wa.uS Ple3le NolB: This map 18 Intandlld for use as a graphical repruentallon ONLY. The City of Federal Wr¡ makec no warranty 31 to itB 1cc1Ø'iC'f. A Federal Way Map I .m ~8/dac4I¡""""p.atri F¡ f L¡ ~ I I' -r r~ \ 1 I City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Community Level Subarea Boundaries Legend: Potential Annexation Area - Community Level Subal'8lU!: 0 Redondo East (Redondo East) 0 Star Lake (Northeast) D Camelot (Northeast) 0 North Lake (Nortneast) D Jovita (Southeast) D Lak8land (SouIheut) 0 Parkway (Sou1he~ Other Areas: 0 Incorporated Area D Unincorporal8d Area Source: City 01 Federal Way, GIS Division & ))8rtrnønt of Community Development Services, BWR. ECONor1hweat. PM Sœerlng Committee, December 2001 VIcinity Map Scale: 0 112 Mile ~ N ~ Map Dale: Døcørnbør, 201)3 CIty of Fedehl W~. 33S80 First Ww¡ S, Federal Way. WA 91003 (258) 681-4000 WHN.d .f8deral-way .WLUS Pleu. Note: This map Islnt8nd8d lor U8e u a graphical r8prtStntlllon ONLY. The City of Fedenl Way makes no warranty u tD itB acctnGY. A Fëdaral Way Map II ...I1n~m_p.anol City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area I Sensitive Areas LeglJl1d: . Lak8haven Utility Dlrtr1ct Well . PriYaIe Wall (All U691i, In Use and Un~.d) BluafGr8S'I Heron Breedng NII&t N Streams 1/ Anadromous FIsh Runs Raådllnt Fish Pnsent ¡'I Rlpar1an ARIaS N Urban Natural Opon Space IV Water Fo\o\r1 ..N D&8pAqulfer Eutom Upland Aquffor . . ¡V RlIdondo . Millon Channel Aqai1er ..N r.trror Laka Aquifer Susceptibility to GrollldNatar Contaminalion - Medium Sensitivity SuBceplibil ity to G rollldNatar Contaminalion - High SenslllVIIV 100 Yaar Flooq¡lain We1Iandc Sourœ: KIng County GIS Center, December 2001, CIty 01 Federal Way Col!1)rehenalve PliID, 2000, Labhaven Utility Dlrtr1ct, 2002 Sheldon and AllOCideB, April 2002 and SbtAI of Wlitlnrrtcn this documøntll not uubctltute for a 1Ield 8,"av. ADDITIONAl. SENSInVE AREAS MAY EXIST. CI. c.w :::e b c: u 5> Scale: 0 1/2 Mile Notð: WlJUands and l1roama ~ wore ldontlftad In a 199& CI~Federai Wf1!o/ stJ¡ . Wikllife N hatiIIat allan comIC from till SIne of WaahlngIXIn Please NoI8: Till, map Is llitendad for uae IS a gnptlcal npr888ntaUon ONLY. The CIty c:i Federal Wr¡ maJœs no warranty 18 to ita iIIòIiurac;y. ~ Map Dale: December, 2003 City of Fedenl W~, 33S80 Firat WtIt( S, Federal Wry. WA 91003 (258) 681-4000 w..wt.c;j .fedoral-wlY.wa.us A F8deral Way Map III .A8.~....1 .rtI.-4 ~lf VI ~.:; ~ Ii - 1.08 * DL -C- ~~ ~~II.. J,. . \ . 'ð'V-" ;~ '" ;¡:~ .. I i "'~ - - 1..1:. I , œIJ , ~ 'n:'t êI., .,! . .. l W : I ì E=7 . frrn - ¡,J/ i . !!I It- j~jrl I., i..l:ûAbdiL, :~ - !:. . . -. I,¡!, rp, I II . I M' I . . , r¡ Ir::J I LJR . \ ~Lßí1., !rrlBÎAvA~ I ' rlTf]:êm f-~ . j--.t1r~_)D! (He 'I i I=PHW:-f- Œ~! . Fttit.riITb . ~ ' ~,~ f-- r-iJH1i~~'.L¡ " Way ?"¡ =- .~i=2= . þ:i H I ~; Lok. ~ ~ I. ~-\)-j,u:~-~ I::j~ -.J LJ )~ ~ ~Fh 6'i. h ÑH . . i~¡Z ì ~~. ~ ~~H ~I¡() IT rTT:q 01 "'-~ I ~,~JIHÇ .~ -!À.~h.\ . .' \-l,~.'J;:r~ ~]I \:\, ),~\ qh í', ,j '7: ..m.ffi ¡' ',~ . . ~'-'~ ,//î L / /1 I "..Jj!~ './ , l-d.- CJJ.j j hFlLf ;ø;"'L: If-JI' ~\ (~= ~ ~~~.' LJE/,l . :b¡:1Æ*'T~~~J---j hilll. ~~~~j ,) Tr'J 0 ~~'.IJ¡ it~l~ -,-- uJ r-Y ~ -Ë h--I---- I j !-i '-'j' Iq:~ ~nl ~ þ-~J ~ ~ , , p .-i , r ~11Þ: 9 I ~lhU I! I b ~¿j - ~ . ~~ ~~ .. \\ IW- ~ HI H-+- :r II E 3\ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Geologic Hazards Legend: ISSJ landslide Hazard Areas Eroclon Hazard Areas c (Thera are NO coal ll'ine hazards or 511Ì5mic hazard5 in tni5 araa.) Potential AnntXition Am- Comml81ity LlIVe' Subareas: Redondo East (RedQndo East) D D Star LakII (Nartheasl) D Camlllot (Northea&t) D Norlll LaJœ (Northeast) D Jovtta (Southlllst) D Lakaland (Soult1ea&1) D Par1<way (Soutfleut) OItIðr Araas: D IncorpolilÚld Area D Unincorporated Area Sou roe: King Coul11y GIS Center, December20C1 1111s document 15 nat a sub&1itutø for a field 5UMIY- ADDITIONAL SENSmVE AREAS ÞM.V EXIST. .,. CI. .., :E ~ c;;;; u so: " , .' Scale: ~ 0 1/2 Mile ~ N Map Date: Dec&mbtr, 2003 PltaSeNo18: ~ at Federal Wit/. Thfs map Is IntendBd for ule 0 Firat W:¡; S, 18 a~~hlcaJ npr8l8ntrt1on Federal W~, A 9&003 ONl. e CIty of Federal (258) 661 000 Ware maims no watTInty W/NI.d .f8deraJ -wi'! .WLUS 18 0 1111 accurac;y. , '" ~ I AFëdaralWay Map IV .1IIo_b~oc4.VII1.....1 Figure V Potential Annexation Area 2002 Existing land Use Distribution (Based on Total Acres) 158.8 73.2 306 . Commercial 13 Easements iïlndustrial 13 No Data 0 Office iii Open Space. Common Areas & Drainage ¡¡¡ Public Park . Quasi-Public . Recreation 0 Residential, Multi-Family 13 Residential. Single-Family 13 Rights-aI-Way . Utilities 0 Vacant CJ Water I?~ Ie' (¡ tJ' -'rl.J. ,'J !7'\ ~ toàsldnH;r: J, ~~~ ,~ 'j I- Moln ,~b~Lab Ill/\) ~-j ~'id[2Ì\ ',\ L=U ~ ,'(8:: ~. "'- 7' ,I-,ÌJ 17ì. ~ -¡'II¡ L ~~~, ~ I ~ "~!x;=. -' "'11:= ~ \~Æ\..) ~ ~ rg~ ~~~ ~ M ~ -~~~ r, fI!r- /rclï:S1til mh ¿;. ~~ - i~, i~ -~~ r -t1 J- f-' ::::' - I .- - : 7 'l: -- .. ! A... ne t~ '- I t"c<','f:!- ~ ~ .' "~v\w -~I E (( ¡ Auburn VT Lr ~ - ....-:... I ~ rr 17J. I ,a,. J:..-- \ I I - \ I - LJ ( .= =,.. '- , ! - ~~ = ~ ~&J~~j'_-'Wð~ :,'.~ -1b ii( f if: ~~\ - I 1 U ~þ r ]I r¡ "---Y~ : ~:kfß ~ u. - ! ,;~ r\- I I......l..... ¡U 1 'V'1~) '-1 Æ 17 tJ I ()O' I /.~) ~ - ï - . 0 I \J ~' ~ f--. -lIT--, ) ~'~ h ) - I ¡ .:: I / I I' LJ ß> ~'", "'.!jI'\ 11 i ~ V t ~ ':0.' >d~~' ~ -~lD'!, l", ~ , ""'iI-' l' \;t _I r;) I m é =f :;ijì{i I~" LL Lr1 ( .)~ ~~r~ ~ -'In'f~ ~ bj I~ I \j ~ -------::: V L>'~ II~ !.olio ~ PT ~ I /( /. ~ ~ .J Ð .~ I- ,,!.olio I J ~ltIc ~ìt1 I~ t,'j A ~ IT 1 r'Mlnon ~---lJ-rn'....l_;¡ ~ I -< I II r ~ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Parks & Cultural Resou rces Legend: Recrelllonal Fac111les: 0 FIshing Ace888, We Geneva 0 Fishing Ace_. Lake Killamey G) Federal Way Sailor Centar ø NorthlaIcB Improvement Club CultlJraI RecolJn:e£ 0 Fancher House Ð Sutherland's Gas SUllen and GrooOIY 0 Westberg Hou.. Comm..,1ty Level Subuea Boundary . Public Pam D Incorpora:ted Area D Unincorponbld Area Sourœ: City of Fedoral Way GIS, lOng COlllty Department at NItur:II RIICOIJI'C8S, December 2001, Fed&nI Way Senior Center, FøbrullY 2002 and State of Wunnøton. Department of FIlii and W1lc1lfe, FebrualY. 2002 CI. <U 2 ~ c:;; u :> Scale: ~ 0 1ft! Mile ~ N Map Date: Decambtr, 2003 PllI3I!eNG18: ~ at Federal W~, Till, map I8lntend8d for use 0 FIr8t W:6 s, 18 I rn~caI nplt8entllfon Federal W~, A SaO03 ONL. e CIty cI Fede raI (258) 661 000 w~ maIœc no wamnty VMW.d .federal-wIY .wa.us IS i1I accuraw. ÂFedaraiWay Map VI /kfwgId<I8t I'IIIn ........... 00Vþ IIta.amI ~ .;--- ~ .,.. I . I . . I Auburn . I '-I ... -... , ,. ... . Millon City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Federal Way P AA Pre-A nnexation Comprehensive Plan Designations LlIlII1d: . Commll1itY BuliinB&6 ~ Multi family . N8igtmorhood BUliilUlK . PaIb and Open Space ~ OfIIce Park D SIngle FaniIy, Mec:lum Density D Single FamiIv, ligh DlII1lity SOUI'Ge: City of Federal W~ CI. ca ~ b ¡;;; u so: Scale: 0 1/2 Mile ~ N ~ Map Dale: Declllnbtr, 2003 Please Nom: Ctlv at Fed.nI W 11/. Till. map 1,lntended for Ulil 33SS0 Am Ww¡ S, 18 a grap~caI npr88entrt!on F8deralWay. WA 91003 ONLY. TheCllyii Fed8ra1 (258) 861-4000 Way maJœc no wamnty WNN.ci.f8deraJ-wI'.wa.ue 18 to ita lŒuracy. A Fëdaral Way Map VII-1 ../1- -~......I ~ 2th ST @ r----. . I Pnlftr: . . I . I llilon .;--- ~.". I . I . I Aubum . I '-I ... -... I I I J . I . City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Federal Way Pre-Annexation Zoning Map Legend: . BC (Communty Bu8lneel¡ !'ill BN (NllÎghbomDOd 8ulÌnllla) . OP (Office Part) D RS.\5.D (1 UnltJ35,ooo Sf) D 1\&8.11 (1 UnltJ9,lIOO Sf) D RS7.2 (1 Unltl7,200 SF) D RS5.o (1 UnitJ5,OOO SF) ~ RM3llOO {1 Unltl35OO Sf} D RM2400 (1 Unlt/2400 Sf) . RM1800 (1 Unlll1lOO SF) SoUrte: C~ of Federal Wr:¡ CL ... ::IE z:;. c u 5 Scale: ~ 0 1/2 Mile ~ N Map Dale: December, 2003 PlweNotB: ~ at Fedel'll w~. Thil map Is Imended for UI8 0 Firat w:t,. S, 18 a ~~hleal npr8lentl1on Federal w~. A 9&003 OHL. e CIty of Federal (258) 661 000 W~ maJœs no warranty VMW.d .f8dltraJ -wI'j.wa.ua IS 0 ita ilŒuracv. A Fedøral Way Map VII-2 ..Aa.......~_........ \~ i I ~ "B77:mIlST ( 'I'~' -W-J T 'J ! I¡\'\ \..\j\ } ;¡ if ~. L'(I J ~ T ' \, ~ i4~ ~ ¡-,-,~ .""",..- ----Ë:-"Y I._' ,=---lP ~f--; ~~\ ~ ~1=a ~ '- ~..J' Das .~, r fí. I . ~~ - . MOln~ .....;, \§., T K-- - I I I r:;;¿, í ',' r ~ ... gff' "" ' ~ I !- ( -.J It ' ~ 1'ì ~ ~ I L.J <,;.b~"""""r\.. J~ r- ..,.. L ""';;--,' "~ ~ *t\1i&,I\ _(:f(~~\.i~ ' If1-u. FO£ .;;:]]:, AV <~~ r ~, f f-?!/T.. S,~;., ~-]_.-d lh@¿~1: =-) ~ \ ~ \ ~~, r~ I I. .. ~ t \ . l .~,.ft~\.. \~í~\ f~~ ~ "".,.~,.",.;"",,~t11... ~~ \ ~n '1 1 I- ~'\... ~----' . ~/:¡YA .'i , I ' j r r-' 1/]1 (, ~ ~eHfr~~.'É1ri!~ lr~ ~. . ~ --1, I "'~ -)- r~~ ~/~ ~~:i~ I .-.. .rt -I ~~15 ;,,~,;; r.. EJr~~~ I .'., H-1'H" ¡' l/.--gJ.'! ~,.,,~., r)- ... ~ I .---.." f ~ ~ Uk. - . '(....--' SIID'7 ',- I I--¡::- ,- r- ',1 ¡' Ii' :---- f¡¡ ~ I ,~:t:J~ ~ E / I, JMíe~ -~ I I, 1{Jz// I,' '--, '~ I c-, I' ','. .~ '8"" ~- ;I I Auburn [/ ,.-t---...J ..,~ - r~ ,I,J (Í. I I . --,~. . \- I \ ::':). I -¡ .r--- -=-~~--j ~ I --1~l ¡ ~-~ I ~LL. i ! I, U /,j -J, JY! ~,.~J 1 II I i- f-:' I .~T ~ /J -~ ' II'... ,;::. \\ I n ~;~f\j ( U lit; 1,1 ~~. R ¡ C5 rr hdlrar-; " i' 1 ¿, H . r '<, -{"" i>J 1 Wu-- ,--}- ,~" r'. / /" ! I ~~'--í I-=:'L\:¡ /' - I I r',. '... \ ct-, 10 / f \ ", ? ) ~ _.....J fa..! ~-- ¡/I,J ! - I ,L 1Þ, rj "'-- 'I ß1- ~1æ ,~ -'- . J \-- ! ' ,I-!r I-.",I~, I T~'~, ,) / ~",.I~",.' ~',"" ~~' I ~ 1" l i-:. '/¡' ri ~. I~I 1V II -1 8\ r - -. -" ~~/I~.. ~ .ß-:-: /') mt 01/1.' .f--Y} ¡" lJ ~..."~,r",!C;-~jJ~ \~I Jj~ ~L . ,,( \ ] r / ~.--fr-=;!,,~ J! I ", ~' II '\ I"'¡ -,J Ii: ~ ~~ --I I ~.. " ~ ~ 't:t -..... I", ,.-~' ~ _.. 'J ,,¿ . I ""1"- -\---, '_- ,'-- ~,. ~,- f r~~'I'~iT, ,'" 'LLJ./,:",I.".,',,6:,',!,~ /.,' , ¡'--' +.;t,>' "' A I. I ,. " " . ," ~~. ::;, .r.. /' i Lø.1if: / I ,to," : i LJ , JJ.TI,y¡ ":..~:~~ ~,r- ( " ".,." t:rl r.k", I v.~,' ~ ñ~. . .,iÃ ,,;Â, , i '11, ?1r- ~ ¡- I' --.y i I . f-...L.; i...LlJ ,.' 'I . ' .'-'. I --1--- _...J. <I I' I .~ i I / I I' 'I / h ~ +'------- 7' '/' / \ If'/ (\ ~-1 c_- ~~ i I I' iìrr---..) I I ¡U ~ ~i-- /" ': ;'.J..?~ ....,J /. i., ..LLJ . . -í ¡--;- - ~ /¡, I U, II /f . .. ~- ~.(~,' ,I, - ','[i'II! Y, j--' ¡ ~,ì. . I I ~ ""i~, j I~ '."~ ~- 'I]z~ i '1\ ~ ""~ ' ~~ÏÎ- II' . !~ R y -J ~~ . ',lA A'I ! II -c ~ ar~~ ./ j~ '~", 1% )1 e-IU2ClflC /. I ' - .. ~~ f-iJ t-. ~ -!. ì~-' I .j,~ It I h I Iu f I I Milton /- -ì-rffi~~ ~S¡ \ . ,'----' I ~ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Su rface Water Facilities Legend: . Conveyance FlClllty . Rllådential Surface Walar Facility Â Commercial Suhct WatBr FaclII1y Regional StDrmwaJør FacIÐIII18: 0 Lab Dolloff Out!et a P-82 (Camalal Pari<) 0 Peasløy Canyon Culvert 0 Rllgðnc¡y Wood&, DIY 1 ø Ragancy Woods, DIY" 0 Regency Wood&, DIY" (2) 0 S 36Oth SI Embukmont 0 SW8et Bñar Drmaga IlT'CIrovamant 0 Regenc¡y Woods, Div 1 e Regency Woods, Div .. (8) D Problem, (In P AA) Sea 1&xl 0 Problam, (Outside P.AA) See text. N Shams 100 Villi" Floo~laln IJ] W81Iandc Hyftlbos Creek: B.ln Lower Greon RIver Buln Lower Pullet Sound Basin Mil Creek Buln WIitB River Basin Source: KQ County GIS Cen1er,'becember 2001, (jog County Department of NlluraJ RelOQ'ÇlI, December 2001 & January - ~ March 2002, :E KIng Coll1l¥ Asliet ~ Oevelopnnt and C Manaaam8llt Section, ëJ March 2002 > Scale: 0 112 Mile ~ NotIr. Wøtlands and mama ~ N wera idøntifilld in a 1998 CI~ of Fed.. W ¡r¡ It1J . Map Dlla: Decamber, 20D3 PI&a8aNO1B: ~ of Federal W IY. Tillt map Is Imendad for ute 0 Am W~ s, IS a ~1,ijcal npr88entrtlon Fadaral W~t A 11&008 ONL. e CIty Of Federal (258) 681 000 W?t maJœ8 no warmty VMW.d .fedar1l-wlY.WLUs 1& 0 ill acr;uracy. A Fedaral Way Map VIII ,kI-.,.aId.__.&1I1 Irl J I ~ /8:mnd1T ( \l¡' LL I 'J ~Î'-\..\ \ ~' i!- ~~t~-~ I~~ i: DISlp ~) J= ~ ~ I k"- ~~.277Ho ~'CMOID~ ,... ". \ ~ ~~- T~ I ...) Et. rr: I \ ~~ 1_-:= r- y p;;;~ ~ 11'~ ~l41T e-~~ .~ f?íKi . -~. :;: ~ ' ~ ~. r~ ~ i II i L ~,~ ~u~ !j~- JØ4T 1 Y ~~.Y i r, ~ ! ~"-1 í;Ç;-~ 11 ~82Hth \~ ~~ n -1 I ~ -' ! ~ r =-/ ~ /~ ~~b .,,¡"" ~ I n J 1:;.., ~ ' fh,~, '-R~§~~" Fr-~..vJ -~~ h= ~ S"~I ITI ~ . I '( ~ ~ ne(¡j{r ! ~ I VJ.: ! ~L j,.J -"'¡¡! Auburn r=:-L 'I: It.l I >- 7. ~ I \ >- I ~I II-- =- ~~. ~ -'lLLL- , J.J I ,.. r-g '~ .;' ~ I I;¡ ¡-'"'I .., r I- m. 'ì"'/ \ ;- *...; ø #L \:ret II! 'i( ~ l~;I I-X ~ = -1 ¡ f-t.~8T ß, r(Federa- ... -~ ~ =- r ~ts;: ~ I. W ! - - ~ ~ ~ r'~ ,. r.;., é". 0.. .-J ,...1 ItU:II1IItII Q ;>~ ~+ð ~ - I 'í I L.L ,U f H,/ . ,- i ~ 7 :J I g)O ~"/.~ ¡-_. 0 . -.- n- ( \J ~" ~, ~ J ;..i-. ffu Ie .,,~~ ~) ~~~: / i -I~ ~ I LJ ~- ! ~ I /:!! .-:. ~ \h I I .-' \J r: "- ,,-- ~ ¡~ ~= .r:-t ~..~ ,g' ~ 'Y'1:- ~~8JI~r? r)~ ;rt ~ i >- J 7 '=~ 1 - d1 /, f- -i :;; ) -, (]:-- A - - 1'- / i . l .. ~1 I t -1 ~S, IA dWJ:. ...r- I I T T f ~ V . ~rLL~ ~-~ T JJ T:411~ - _4I~ ~ .L.. ~) - I \ I .~ .~ ) I J ~Ift~ ~ ft" t t ~ -~". ll~ ~ I: I I ~11Io. þ. I I îJ. rn 7"'~-"" I \\ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Arterials & Local Streets Legllltd: Fedaral Way S1ro&t CI.sllcat!ons: N Pltnclpal Arterial N "'nor Arteñal N Principal Coltctor N NlnorCole~or Potential Ann8Xl1lon Area- Comm... ity LlIYal S ubareaa: D Rodondo Em (Redondo EI81) D Star Lak& (Norllleast) D Camelot (Northtut) D North laJœ (Northeast) D .Jovita (Southeast) D Lalœland (SouIt1eait) D Parkway (Southeast) O1f1ar Areas: D Incorporated Area D Unincorpormd kea Sourœ: KIna County GIS Center, December2DO1, City of Federal Wav C~rehensÎYII Plan, 2000 a. a; :E Ç:;o ¡;;; u 5 Scale: 0 112 Mile ~ N ~ Map Date: December, 20M Please No1B: CI\v of Federal W~, ThIs map II Intended for uae 33S80 FIr8t W", S, 18 a grap~caI npr8llentlt!on FedaraiWay, WA 91003 ONLY. TheCityCi Federal (258) 651-4000 Way malœc no warranty WHN.d.federal-wlY.wa.us 1& to ita II:CUI'ICV. A fedøral Way Map IX .hn~1 \ \J Ii:" 82721<1 aT (,J. ~L¡' ..I.-U, T . -.! ~ Î'- \. \ \ rJ :¡ [~~I ~ I-E~ (~ t¡ ~ --- C V Ii- ø..4=f J ~ ...;~ I fC.'----' .O""" .,!~ Molnh ~ I '!.- - ilLT\ 1_/ ~~rt\t 1'\ ~ T=-. - ~- - .,.., r'"' rL I ;- ~ ~~U" e .. .. ~ \ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~~ . ..;. U L r t== " g '.tS~.. ~ ~1J~- -:3~:_\, "I ~ . I..A'..Y i I rJ ~ ! -r ~~ ITI ~' 1 \AI I ( ti n -1- ~ , !~ ~ c-, I / ~ 2 - ~, ~ 'î ~.~ ......"" ~I n <.j i:;¡,¡,.. ~ ~-- --H -~ ~~ ~ ,'I I-~='" , / 1..[\lr 1-111 Ei:-' i -~ :-~_! TL ~ ubi aT' ~ ¡! ne(¡j{,j,! ~ I 77 ! r-~ ~ -----! Auburn ~ 8 If--.., I-- I ~I I ~ ~ 8th. ~ --r-j 1 rr, r~ ,. I -(" - " ~'r 1-' --"', ~ I,.. ~ ~ l\~ I , \. 8$2181; 'U¡ ~i¡( > '- ~ ~ ..Ao.. \i1 - ~ .c I.. - .J 6 lHoUhIrr ~ ....... ,- ~a - ... ~ (~L'\7, Ffldlra ,.I .L~ CI ~ r W 1- £.' - I-- ,- ~~ . r j., '? 0.,. ,...1 81:taJ ~ ¡;,~. ;,. ~~ - f--J. Y c.! ," I' H~.-v>\'lt 7 ]" , g)O :+J~: /.!;,T ~ ï-- 0 ìr \J '~~ # ~-- . 5 J ;;;¡- -¡ 'I (u a: ,"' # rt ~ ) ..J ! ...... i --/ n 7'!,.J, ! ¡{;l / = rt~ ~ll J I""¡~ \J ~ " ~ it Ð~ ~ l . .IIL \( /-"~1W.!;.P1 L~ ;1 "r ;r '- ~? I, I fl. [!T I. I r ç ~ r- -) '-i éJ ~ UI' ...... ~,. y::-= /. 1 - .. . 'I t: ---š, ~~ r¡ ..L.U ~, I I' I ~ . P. ~ ! r rll\ (I -It ToVÜß ~ 1 ~I II ~~).J. Sl8ØltlaT ILl ; , l-W ü-1 'XJI - '£~ ---'V4 h ~ (I -~ . ..rl I rD ~~ ~= /~/ ;1 þ, -rf ~ ~. ~ +L ¡ I( /'v, ~ ".:rr-" .~ r- I Lhcltll: to. ~ ~~~ t .. J ">. G- I ~"'" A.° , r.ì ~J - - ~ '------- ~ I 1 J City of Federal Way- Potential Annexation Area Existing Roadway Level of Service Legend: LOYal of Sorvice Intersections: 0 Me8bi CftyLOS . Failed krtorseclion (Before Mitigation) Fedll~ Way SInIt CIa5sifications: N Pltne/pal Arterial N "'nor Artertll N Priltcipal Coleclor N "'nor Coloctor D Incorpor:rt.edArta D Unlnçorpormd Area Potential Annexlllon Area- Commll1lly Love'S ubareu: D Redondo Em (Redondo Eaø1) D Star Lab (Nortl!east) D Camalat (Northeast) D Hortl! LakII (Northeast) D Jovita (Southeast) D Lalœland (SouihtIast) D ParKway (South.1St) Source: King County GIS Center, December 2001, CIty of Fedenl WI¥ Cofl1)rehenBIV8 PIIII, 2000, Jones & Stoke" 2002 c:a. '" :E b ~ u so: Scale: ~ 0 1/2 Mile ~ N Map Dale: December, 20D3 PleaseNo1B: ~ of Fedel'll W~, Thla map 18 Intendad for U88 0 Am w~ s, 18 a ~~~caI npr888ntrt!on Fedoral W~. A 91003 ONL. 0 CIty or Federal (258) 661 000 W1t maJœc no wamnty VNNI Jj .fedoral "NIY .wa.us 18 0 ita accuracy. A Fëderal Way MapX ..hn---....I Ifj I~ J 8T(JI',-L,1 J,.-UL'I'J IÎ'-\.~,> { ¡ L ~~~¥~r-~ I~~ !¡~~;IH _/~Nf r~ I -~j.271th E ~ A ~~ - -' ~(¡fSJ ) ~\1L~ .~~ - I- :i r J U ~.]1411'" e.v- - 14 ~~ r - ~ Þ n ~ ~ ~ "' rf1J i L ,,~ ~- ~ ~ ~~;::: -~ ~~~ i- 1 ~~.. ~ ~~ ;~~- I~~" ì \--rl ~ ~ .ft . I J-- '\ ~. ~ :::rvç ~ l.r I ~ ~~"" il r I (î! f-r- ..J:nÍwlri'- ~ ITI ~.-J.. 2Hth ), \ I M n -1 j I ~ ~ !l--;.I '(:.It)I) N 3 b'fflÆ ~ ,.~~tr n~~ ~ ~,~ 1,çI rF1I.D1 ~ES ~;;~ ~ h: ~ ..~6tI.1 ~ .I: I '< ~ æneiõrr '-'- I P I tTJ ST : I ! ~ .J,.J ----- ~ Aubum ~, ì ~. ; II . " f- 7~ -:;;11 f- ¡( I VI r == ~ ~, _..*":"¡ î ' 1(: ~ ~'U' ~c~~ ~. r '"'(-If" \:rat! r;¡ ---, ~ oC r/ I l ~.....;;,~ - .-J ti J- . - ~ - r ... ~.. 'IE 7 ~dlnl ..1 - \ T"~ - Ì\..-., ~Ì\! ~ ! - ~ ~'~ .; \ -."..J¡;;7 - ~~.. ~,. \- L J ,U IT H . .-¡ ! 7 J" ~ g)~ ~ # ~pJ '~I I f - - . 0 S -In-=¡ #u ~ I~#rb~). J! I , i / â .h -f ~ ~~ I ! Ie:! \J ~ "- #-- ~ i ~= .~ t..~ .....;- - \l r ;Z../- ~ I; r )~ ; . I U ¡ >- .,. -- ~ - 1 f--j :¡;; Iy-t ---f' ~ f JJ..L I I T ~ ~ \! r r1T\ ( T ~~ ToviúJ , X' II r-:~ f.-l-. U8atflaT lit I .. LL Lri LJ ¡ . .' ---, VJ §J<i (I /I, \j - - 'I "" -- I I l \E - f- ~ Ao°' -, A ~~I -j C- ILT I I ~llon .~---ìï-m.....~_,.7 I '----" I l\ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Vear2020 Roadway Level of Service LIIgIll1d: Level at Servico Intersections: 0 Me- CRy LOS . Failed Intersection (Ikrforo Miligalioo) Federal W æ¡ Strait CIKsífications: N Prtnclpal Artertal N "'nor Artella! N Principal Cohcfor N "'nor Coloctor D Incorporatad Area D Unlncorponl:8d Area Potential AnntXa1Ion Area- Comm 181!ty Laval S ubareu: D Redondo Eat (Redondo East) D Star LíIIœ (Nor1l1aast) D Camelat (Northeast) D Nor1l1 LaJg (Northeast) D Jovita (Soutl1ea&t) D LaIaIIand (SouihIIaãt) D Parkwa1 (SOutltla&t) SOUI'CI: King County GIS Center, DllClmber2001, CIty at Faden! Wav Co~rel1en81V8 P18II, 2000, .Ionos & Stokes, 2002 0. '" :::::E b I: U 5 Scale: ~ 0 1/2 Mile ~ N Map Dale: December, 2003 Please Nom: ~atFedenlW~. TIlle map Illmended for ute 0 Ant W~ S, 18 a ~~~caI npr988nt1t!on Federal W~. A 91003 ONL. eCllydF8deral (253) 661 000 W?t malœl no WIITIIrty YNIN.ci .federal "NIY.wa.us 1& 0 ita ilŒuracy. A fedaral Way Map XI ~.aml City of Federal Way- Potential Annexation Area 20 Year Proposed I nte rsecti 0 n Improvements ~UT:-~~ ,---' ILt L.&gsnd: ;-1 ~ _.. . Propoeed Inllllrsection Improvement I ~ I Auburn ,/. I . . I i .. '.-.l--r--+. ... i -----~...¡ . ,- '--, I i I ~ Ä- / '\ ,./ //\"1 \---- , i \ I , I , t'v." , Vicinity Map Scale: 0 1n Mile !:l N ~ Map Dale: December, 2003 Cltv of Federal WII(, 33S3O First Wæ( S, Federal Wr¡. WA 91003 (258) 6&1-1000 w.wv .ci.fed&raI~.wa.u8 Pleue Nots: This map Ie Intandlld for use as a graphical rtpl'tsentallon ONLY. The City of Federal Wtt¡ makec no Wlrranty as to itII accura1ò'. å Fëderaa Way Map XII .118 ~-mpm&p.amI i\~.!it .. " (, -:1r--w T .E~KWí'-\ ~ I, ~ ~ ~ /~ I ~ '-E ~~ t% --- ç: y 0.. 'M - ='>-=) f ~ I ~J Moll -, ~ 7i -1 ~l Qffi ,-- - L ",AN) - ~U 11' e Idrlct 4 ~~~. ;;:-?Jlii ~ .'- ~ ~i-ï, L ~ ~ r- rlfY t ~\~;: J - U L ~ ':õ.n.8è'11 ~.~ i Y ~ 1/1 I r I '\ ! -;- yr r=111 -. I I f': n .j 1\ ~ !I-- -~-]l. ~ h~ b '.~M -I nlo '~ ~ ~~ -Q;) ~Yr;Fh '-~ ~ I- ::: Dlctr1ct ~ b I- I \ I!- f- r-.. r 139 , n ~II '"-'-OTI1 E ; ~ ;;;æ ~~ I ~ I [Z ! c:- ~ (f I Aøbum 4 ~' '- - f- I ~ I J '>-- . -rl -'- fYl ~ 0'" -:".,";~ II I f- -~ l/ \f.. _\1 ~ ~ I J (l ! - """".\ := ~ ~j Fodl~\--' .~ ~ Ir W i - -rl a I-- ~ f-- ~ ~ . - ~ ~ -. h7 ¡; ~~ - W8 - ::::J \/;;; oIœ . rr L I ,u I H .-¡ I [) I F&f ( i\5 ~ .' . ~ ! ~- r- 0 . """ I ~ I >- - CI J" :;.-' II -f I LJ . -It: ~ ~ I I A-iJ 7, !~ J'-'>. I ~ v,l .[ ~_.--. ~ -~ \..J ~ ,,~~ r~~dL.' ç~ ~ ~ () -- ~# i. ~ 8e- I 88 ~ I' - ., I Î~ [LVi" LlJ ~.{~ ~n ~ (,~ ) I < ' D r---- 1ft I ~Ire r---- AlII J blliric Po -~ "@) -I I'I ~T I 'r--~ .~ >-- ~ II '111'~~ t~L ~fJ 1- f-- I! C~1f 1 1111101 1\,' '-.w ~r heme , ~\ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Fi re Department Facilities Legend: . Fir8 Station IV Fire Dletr1at Boundazy Comm~ity LIVII Subarea Boundary D Incorpormd Area D Unincorporated Aria Sourœ: FedmI W¡y Fin! Department, CIty of Federal Way GIS DMslon, FobrLm)' 2002 Q. <IS ::Ii! b I:: 5 Scale: ~ 0 1/2 Mile ~ N MaP Dale: December, 2003 PlweNo1B: :L of Federal W~, Tille map Illntned for uee 0 FIrcI w~;S, 18 a ~~~caI npr.errta1lon Federal W~. A 91003 ONL. e CIty or Federal (258) 6&1 000 W?; makBc no wamnty VNNI sj. f8deral-YR/.wa.JJ8 18 0 ita aŒUraCV. Â fëdaral Way Map XIII . .Aam/m~dloUftll j\\-l I I C:" (b I -1 I '-1 -\~ :} K, j I ~ I Lu- I ---E : I 41'---.- \.P 0" ~- r::: Y I DISg/K-,1 '""~ NJ ~ I '~U ~. .01'1 -J f!1itf;:.A) D -'- .~C'" I) l'\ r~,^' rL '1)= b?I 11I4lT e1=-. Ii KfJIIl ~. 1'\ "",'[',I- J~ ~ ~- ':., .=-- 'J!" ,,;;.. I ~ UI~;='i£ u L f~ = ~_. St., ~\ I'~ ~J~J- ~~ 1 t ~ ~ ;--p-/-jl rl~~ !~'i ~1~ ( ,', ~~~-;-"'ð r "~:~~ h~'" L"I I: rnt...¡', ,.. ~,"~;":I:I." ~~ I'.i ~ -, ", --rG D ';~I,_.'..I,t f-I~: -.""", "Y-1LC I ~_lJTJ ! ::: ~ ~! Auburn ~:r,~ - . .' - F~;-~ in ! .~b ~ ¡l!:i:l ~, ,;' Scbo I JM-""f -':" ~ [t~ \ ;- ~ '-.; - ~-:~.l. - ;-- ..J - . -, ~~ - -t yc=r 7 Fed.rar--..I ~~~ ~.~ D ~ r -'--v, .l~ W I - - 'ôiiin ~ . ~ r .j 0 .~ - ~~' ~ - uS -0 1-'JIce. ;-/ r- L 1. ,u T H .-¡ l---':'L7 } \ g)\j #' ~ I ~ "-, . 0 J=f' r~~~ u ~~¡ i'~~ ~ / ~ ~~I 111'- I h ! ~_.:-~th¡(T~~ -- ~ l-r ¡- r-- r ~ ~ I ~ , 6 =f . b:-E () ~ ~- '- i. y ¡~ I II II' \ ~! r ~k' ",:,:,~" 1 ~ I ~4°vila ¡ É i)I~ LL 1 ~ LIJ:- (.oj ~! (, ) I ~ '~""" D ~!J=;J,~(,;I Vd{ Par~ay -' ~__Il~~<-- @) I j 1:111:, ~ I..' J ."~- ~r¡ I J Vll1IIon ~ ! ! r:'Î ~ Met L I I ! ,- ",,- --uï'T';".'-~.t7 I-- I .l\ I- City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area Public School Facilities legend: N School District Bollldary . ElemlllTtary School . Junior High School D Sanlor High Scholll Potlll1lial Annemion At8a. Carom II1Ity Lavel S ubareaa: D Radondo East (Redondo East) D Star Lake (Nortf1eas1) D Camelot (Northeast) D Nortl1 LaIcII (Northeast) D Jovita (Southllllij D lalœland (Southøas1) D Partwav (Southeut) OtI1or ArNS: D Incorpor;rted Arta D Unlncorpol'lted Area Sou roe: FodonI Way School DI5tr1Gt. CIty at Federal Wa:¡ GIS DIVIsion, 2001 Scale: ~ 0 1nMlle ~ N Map Dale: December, 2003 Pl8a.8eNO1B: ~ at Federal WtII, TIll, map 18 Intended for tile OAmW~s. 18 a~~caI npr8lerrta1lon Federal W~t A 9&003 ONl. Cllyót Federal (258) 651 000 W~ malœ8 no warranty WNN .c;i,fedor1l ~.wa.u8 1& 0 ita m:uracv. A~Way Map XIV ~ lea"""""'. 4/..,.klloI.&rnI ~mr;j~,~" '~~,:¡~H~' ~",~'¡,'" "r,' ""-4Þlt, c'~~\ ~~ ",¡,t! !"'-,,¡¡¡r¡¡';~~' ~~::!.: ~~~,- ,'cr.,o-:ç.t '-, _..- L~ ~}!: J -,' ,¡, . III !':'~~I:" Ll..L .~~. J' i 'é, 'r::r '?o"- t:~ø ':', ,",": .., 7' E'"" ,', [,m' ~lf;: , ' ,', í' -' "'--'-".'i. ,'- (..Li¡". '... \ J.~~r~ ".' - \.~ , " 'J """ ~.. .,~ ;:' ¿-- '~L' '(~,;;~". ',~ io= ".. " ." I'" ~'~,:o"ll ,\., "',' 'IT: IM"T 'fI""", 'IL,c' "on "I, ,,"" I~ê'<-', . . ,- ~~ ~':" ~. -:', ",'L~ia,;;;",,¥.: .ii,' '~/,,:: " ');J."lt'L¡,..q..!n~"",li.VZT '~ ,n'slar'l;qJ(é1 :', , " '\'?~~',! ,..h'., "8',/'1 ".:All. '", , ',,:, 'I,;' ,,' "I".~...~!.!... 't-o-"",,~, 1." ~'1ð:\~~{>n ¡', .,1 ~,"-: ':'1 - '~~-'- h-, ';:¡ :;, 'f&¿,',!6 ,J -:: ~ n' ii', ,I, i 1-:-"', ...--..., 1,1, ,. , ".:.r....~; i. ..J::;)' '~o..' ,I ' ~;I, I, "-?{' , I-.,J ,1, ,,:1 , ~!t \. r-' ~~ -, , ~'" ,:'," In ~ 'E\,' 'f ~- ,-' Ji ~;.~:d ~.:..,~::.-~ ~' ~,',-, ~{ \' ~' , "" '(U-::¡,'RJ V..-., "rJ', ,tJ: r6J:' ,5;<,' ~ , I"~ "......~ ~"...":., liQ-L.."",,:--- 'I,' 'I' , ~c.s' '.....,~ """ \ 2i "" r;~/~ ::,: T ~"'. 'o~<\'n; r~~:e-: "'c;: ¿,f-f,~ 1'.J"""IoSiIO" ~:Ji"',',',CH"",'iå","hr \. ,", ~'h:,',' ~,ij;c, :;'~,' .:";;<1",,:" "',',.,,1"':\-,, n,;..r").'Í\:f"n,,,'-C'" ,.; ['1-0:"""--:'; .::u=-::3I;:;f, L .. " '- ' , ~ .~n '>'" ~.,:,-r>~~._, '~' ", ",.c~""",fFJ." "', "~,,,,"I1F.~',',L'" ""-' ,,"',"1 " " ' ", ". ~L';:;' "" " -; ~C:"~I;C"'1~:; ~; /"1,; ,: 'n"",."" ~:;', O:'..;~_:"~I'~;:~~" ".",1,1;--1!!":>-:r"'!,: -... : óI) , ~ ,- , ';J1 ' "lvrl~ ,~ :J<', ;/('(, I "'"' ~I~j "", 5 :i()~ ;r, I h , i r,c};. -..:zU-~~ ' , '"n ~71,' " ¡1--n", ",_."" ,. ~,,:,,~~,'i"="-'~"~ ""',,',:,',"",,'.,'., "'.';7',",':'~: ]'r-' p ,1,,- >:;:fI" \. ;'",' ,'n> "",;,' 'o'-¡-, ~." ... ..:.. ~.u.', '.¡;~' .",r1'"",'l,,"~]r~~-,;:,',;,',,"',,',",',~ff~ u - ,~"...., E ,tl~\:",. ,:",~:'Yj,~':'.,,~:,,",'~,~~~ .. 1", : U -1-- ' :' , :~::c::: ~ ~" 'jli"'~ ;z;.I .:: 1-."..,. :- ,I,. ;"!;.y: ','¡;' '~, , ~~ '" - ',j , ...X:,}.l ,,~ ,- ;E : ~ [.i U"Þ ',... - ::J ~ . I ~! ~~' ~n -;? ,C :~::j ~ l~~im H1 "w, ::n ':.L " r L.Cpjþ" I -, '""",' , ~""" ¡;i! ," ,'#:", ~~L~ :r,t' H. IIi' ? h " .;:¡u... , ":¡~ -~//\' ~>""-~""'-":;C:" .. '- -, ,---, ",n ¡'"",.",,~, " ," L...J I ",-" '?,->n; .::¡ ¡-':1,1!':-':;:: ,....- ~,; ¡J- ,-,:.,.., '!!lor-- -= .-" --c""',"', "', -~" ;"L-~ ,¡.- . ", L:~ . '~~'" T -/ -'. ", ' L,LI""'""",,,,',,, "'.,.,',,", , ".,'",',,',',\',", 1,;1"", ),lfI=:""',',' ", '""", ¡;:;;"~,',~,','.~ [\ :" }1 T:I/ ,,;":-" -~, ,j c,,:~ ::1"'- II ~ Ji "'.-"'<\" ,.. , -, ,"0' ,~m, - ~.:'::t;-"';~' :¡\'.E:i'VE'I'"",~ ,I:.. '~, ,c:~",,^:, , '1""J':;'" \'.4,'I~tt""",-=,.. ~",l,',;J{;~ ~., ,"¡";L,,',_,,~1if ",' ~~yera. ",,',p,:",i~,=,"",,','~,"~~.'r;"_;~,,',"~.,'::~':","",'~""','I',C" ~,',-'.',"I-,',',:1,." ~"':I?1 YY' c_-;'J~~~", ""'! " L"""J:-<,,, "",""'-,--"O,',,,',,' ",'r,--I,,' ~. L..~.: >..i" ~ """"¡¡;I'~":: '~'~'~\ \..¡...' ~:b' '" '::"',..,,' ~ ...., ,'. "O ,,'gir'.. ,/:!:! - - ": "..n..,,=:, v".'9A', ,-, Nonh n,' ~.'" :-" "m _/"+, f:n '~,' I ,... ::J', j g ',,', '"n ,I L,~,::",JJ' r!:,','ÍJ.i,'~"~,' "¿;:\"\I'ß::! .......':.-/,"- ~., -_J le.:-,,~: ~.:, ~1~~- ~~'" y/ ' " ~)p~~", ",llP-:Jì' ~~f//t,~,c"" "<: ,.,"",;:':.. ..itlr,I"",~,b","::," ' .~.t:L.",l~/:"/ /. :::"""t',",'~,, " io"I,'YI"'I-JL....~-, "... :/' ,/p"'"~-l'~'l'/ ";""r .,,' ,:,- ':, f{'..::,L¡ ,-:/-:\:~'.. ,~, .7 P ".1', V K~) '~y j "À'¥:." UJi:;c: ,,- ~~:""T=r~- JQ~.: ~ .1{' \J, """"'r~,~#=:"r'-c~'¡ , 'r:~r', ~, J, s-; L U ( J ~~.. - ~~ .,~i.,::;' ~~, .~ i~, ::~,', ¡. ~nJ: , 1/':..11, ~joc=~ '~-_.\'tI.=t=-:~ ~ ".e.... ~" ":' ; :' - ~/ [, r- ',....oc.,..¡ Þ"':'~::F r~" -, :~::, " ' z.- :" -" V,A - c.: ';. :::::,H"';,, , -'i';U!:::f_/ > ~ .~. .:.;;,ç,=:c ,,";; t '){" ,-- ,,:,7 n\ th\ ' " ,~:'ri1¡;" ~~-r" 't-'(i%.~ 'q-~~J : ¡¡ -, H"", , ;,:;fJ \~ ~ J.J:: ¡¡ ~ ~ ~:~ : t ~ :, .I I. F--., ,c: ~ ' I , :,"" >. 'tJ'.... 'l,'rt1T;: ';."I'.:,.'I-:~ '",.;è. I I L ' -'..' ' '" , . . 1;" " LB' ~""', II) ,"'~V'.~ \ 'J ' . L.:J ?-J:'" 'Ì." - ' . '" " "" '" T lli ,//1 lakf1a1ld N:, \ ¡~ Ii.., :-_To" n r1~, ," -.., J J I lIk~,::::, /~v.it,'~f.f;~ I!P!I. ! '0' 1 I; ~ '--' ',~ ..,g¡ ,~~"" , ~ '.a'~ " P-,' ~ V "'j' ,'.~'" """'" " .." ~.." , """CO""C"Hîr-,'"",'",,', ',::L ,-,~"'J;~; "~&:j~t1J¡ '",,' ;:.,':¿ '"U"",',-r;HVc" \; c-=:.iJ,,',;: :íb,;:': '" ,,)'i~C~, :" /1, . ~ t. .', :...;;..,~~c'-'VA ""..,::.:j':=';'" ,~',..' ~ "~1;!{'-- ~, , ,',", ,,', '~",~"",-~.ti,-.....g.:j) ~"'!¡;O. .J,-- 1";"-"", '~";:;;." -, ,1./: ;-'::::;[11;:-'",'(;";).' '-:f"., -,- g- ~ "'/1 ¡. ~' " f,l : c' " ,'" ,) ¡j- \ ~ ", ';' I- - r---- ,- :--' , ,f.-'-" "f t ~~" ','I; ! ",','.' Htl.1",' " ,,',~, ~ "'..-~~.. I', ~ ¡.. LJ, ,f. J fI;~, ~.J", ,\" , , ..1' . ..;::; ~;6;ì::' 1'1 ¡, ,"", ", ..', n , -v ~ 'II -';""-"-'-.. .' I ~I' ¡ I'~',l"-Jiar ':', 1, ",",,';~,I:,' p t' //,: ~', :7"",.' I'W '"", <>, - r: - r-4.4- 1!tß~,.c '~,...., /' :i";(' , t~~ -I" ':' ,.~=ë "íì.Æ:' Ii' .. " - t ' : i "'. Jj§Sl§ : r---....ø,P ... , f'o..~' , ' /==~~.._-- .- ,.f. ..:ï . ',' , ,- I,M'lt" i t~~ ~~~ ~ 1 ,,- ---- ~'--'-'l__._! !IOnl~":"'" """~-"'- '1,1. IC',¡\ City of Federal Way - Potential Annexation Area I Water Service legend: . Booster Pump Station ~ Intertie Vault W Tank . Well (lake haven Utility District water source) i-tii lakehaven Utility District Boundary '.Y ,,""'¡" Water Service Area Boundary N Water mains under 10" N Water mains over 10" Potential Annexation Area, Community level Subareas: D Redondo East (Redondo East) D Star lake (Northeast) D Camelot (Northeast) D North lake (Northeast) D Jovita (Southeast) D lakeland (Southeast) D Parkway (Southeast) Other Areas: D Incorporated Area D Unincorporated Area Source: Highline Water District, 2001, lakehaven Utility District, 2002 a. '" ~ .£ c:: '-' :> Scale: 0 1/2 Mile j N ~- Map Date: December, 2003 City of Federal Way, 33530 First Way S, Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 661-4000 www,ci.federal-way,wa,us Please Note: This map is intended for use as a graphical representation ONLY. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy, å Federal Way Map XV /uso"'mkoslpaafdoc4/w.tor,.ml '-:-::;',jt:è . -0.. :.;:: ." '. _~1.i!ton. - . ....." City of Federal Way- Potential Annexation Area Wastewater Service, Septic Repairs and Complaints Legend: . Septic Repairs (Complete/Pending) @ Septic Complaints .... Booster Pump Station ~~:;~'f lakehaven Utility District Boundary ;A'i Sewer Service Area Boundary N Sewer mains under 10" N Sewer mains over 10' D Incorporated Area D Unincorporated Area Potential Annexation Area- Community level Subareas: D Redondo East (Redondo East) D Star lake (Northeast) D Camelot (Northeast) D North lake (Northeast) D Jovita (Southeast) D lakeland (Southeast) D Parkway (Southeast) Source: Lakehaven Utility District, 2002 King County, 2002 a. ro :2: :£; c:: u :> 0 Scale: 1/2 Mile ~ N ~ Map Date: December, 2003 City of Federal Way, 33530 First Way S, Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 661-4000 WWN.ci.federal-way.wa.us Please Note: This map is intended for use as a graphical representation ONLY. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. å Fè'derat Way Map XVI ./us",/mi<.slpaa/doc4/sowor.aml EXHIBIT ß l.lo. CHAPTER TWO - LAND USE 2.0 INTRODUCTION Through the CityShape and Vision process, the community produced a general concept of what the City should look and function like in the future. This general concept was used to form the basis ofthe Land Use chapter. The Land Use chapter serves as the foundation of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) by providing a framework for Federal Way's future development, and by setting forth policy direction for Federal Way's current and future land uses. Development of land, according to adopted policies and land use designations discussed in this chapter, should result in an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. The land use policies are supplemented by a Comprehensive Plan Designations Map (Map II-], maps are located at the end of the chapter) that provides a visual illustration ofthe proposed physical distribution and location of various land uses. This map allocates a supply of land for such uses as services, employment, parks, open space, and housing to meet future demand. 2.1 THE LAND USE CONCEPT Federal Way's existing land use pattern (the physical location of uses) exists as a result of development administered by King County until 1990 and subsequent development under Federal Way's jurisdiction. As shown in Map II-2 (Generalized Existing Land Use) and Figure II-] (Percent Gross Land Area By Existing Land Use, page 2), in September 2001, 42 percent of Federal Way's gross'land area was developed as single-family development, 11 percent as multiple-family development, and 12 percent for office, retail, and manufacturing uses. Updates to the FWCP will not substantially modify this land use pattern. What will change is how various pieces of the land use pattern interact to achieve common land use goals. Figure II-2 (page 3) depicts the land use concept. The land use concept should result in the following: . # Transformation of the retail core into an intensely developed City Center that is the focus of civic activity which provides a sustainable balance of jobs and housing; # Preservation and enhancement of existing residential neighborhoods; Figure II-] FWCP - Chapter Two. Land Use Percent Gross Land Area by Existing Land Use, September 2001 Commercial 5% Drainage 1% Office 4% Open Space 6% Par1<s 6% Note: Does not include right-or-way # Creation of a network of parks and open space areas; # Diversification of the City's employment base by creating distinct employment areas; # Promotion of new retail and service employment opportunities around the 1- 5/South 320th and I-5/SR 18 interchanges. # Promotion of new opportunities for residential development near transit centers; # Provision of community and commercial services to residential communities; # To the extent practicable, preservation of environmentally sensitive areas; # Promotion of convenient residentially scaled shopping for residential neighborhoods; # Promotion of housing in the City's commercial areas close to shopping and employment; # Promotion of redevelopment of "strip commercial" areas along major arterials into attractive, mixed-use corridors served by auto and transit; # Promotion of the development of well designed commercial and office developments; and # Accommodation of adopted growth targets for households and jobs and Puget Revised 2002 11-2 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Sound Regional Council (PSRC) growth projections within the proposed land use plan area. Revised 2002 11-3 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Figure 11-2 The Concept Plan Diagram Concentrate new development in the High_y 99/1-5 corridor. Develop infl'3$tructure to support' corridor devetopment. Transfonn retail core into a new mixed-use City Cenœr. , Preserve and enhance existing single- family neighborhoôds. Crea.t~ a netwOric of parks and open '.("1 ""'"'~ Diversify employment base by creating distinct employment areas. '~,- rJJJ. Create new inteMive residèntiaf . communities supported by transit. Provide community and com'mercial services to residential comm~nities. Revised 2002 11-4 FWCP - Chapter Two. Land Use 2.2 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE CHAPTERS The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all FWCP chapters. Internal consistency among the chapters of the FWCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient use of limited resources. Below is a brief discussion of how the Land Use chapter relates to the other chapters of the FWCP. Economic Development Federal Way's economy is disproportionately divided. Based on PSRC's 2000 Covered Estimates by jurisdiction~ retail and service industries compose more than 70 percent of Federal Way's employment base. Covered estimates are jobs that are covered by unemployment insurance. Dependence on retail trade stems primarily from the City's evolution into a regional shopping destination for South King County and northeast Pierce County. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Tukwila and the Auburn SuperMall, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To improve Federal Way's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy. A diversified economy should achieve a better balance between jobs and housing and supports the City's quality of life. In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the following: # A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing. # CoIDfl'ffinity Business and Business Park development in the South 34Sth Street area. # Community Business development in the South 34Sth Street area and around the 1- 5/South 320th and I-5/SR IS interchanges. # Continued development of West Campus. # Continued development of East Campus (Weyerhaeuser Corporate and Office Park properties). # Redevelopment and development of the SR-99 corridor into an area of quality commercial and mixed use development. # Continued use of design standards for non-singleJamily areas. The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see Revised 2002 11-5 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use the Comprehensive Plan Designations Map II-i). A complete discussion of economic development is set forth in the Economic Development chapter. Capital Facilities Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, parks and open space, and surface water management. Infrastructure and Urban Services The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities and the maintenance of existing facilities. As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be financed by voter-approved bonds, impact fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), and money from the City's general fund. To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements. Water Availability Based on reports from the Lakehaven Utility District, the estimated available yield from the underlying aquifers is 10.1 million gallons per day (MGD, 10-year average based on average annual rainfall). The District controls which well to use, thus which aquifers are being pumped from, based on a number of considerations including water levels and rainfall. In order to reduce detrimental impacts to its groundwater supplies in the recent past, the District has also augmented its groundwater supplies with wholesale water purchased from the City of Tacoma through water system interties. In addition, the District has entered into a long-term agreement with the City of Tacoma and other South King County utilities to participate in the construction of Tacoma's Second Supply Project (a second water diversion from the Green River), which will provide additional water supplies to the region. As a result, the water levels in the aquifers have remained stable, and the District's water supply capacity will increase to 14.7 MGD on an annual average basis when Tacoma's Second Supply Project is completed in 2004. Concentrating growth, along with conservation measures, should help to conserve water. Water Quality Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City. Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water; and, continued health of the City's streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining the health of the aquifers that rely on surface water for recharge. Contamination of an aquifer, by contaminated surface water, could lead to serious health concerns and/or expensive treatment requirements. To address this concern and impacts of new Revised 2002 11-6 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use development, the City prepared a Surface Water Management Plan. The plan specifies actions to ensure water quality including the development of regional detention! retention facilities to control rate and quality of water runoff. Furthermore, development of a wellhead protection program with the Lakehaven Utility District should provide guidelines to avoid possible contamination. Policies contained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for development near wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Capital Facilities chapter. Parks & Open Space One of the most important and valued elements of a high quality living and working environment is a parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction in environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent properties; provides areas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City. To maximize open space opportunities, the City will coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions to create a region-wide open space system as contemplated in the Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs). Map II-1 depicts areas where existing and/or proposed parks and open spaces are located. This map is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan. Potential Annexation Area To facilitate intergovernmental planning and policy coordination, the CWPPs require each jurisdiction to, ". ..designate a potential annexation area" (P AA). The City's P AA lies within unincorporated King County, generally east of the present City boundary. The boundary has been defined through cooperative agreements between the City and adjacent jurisdictions. In Noyember 2001, the The City of Federal Way, in partnership with King County, initiated the preparation of the Federal Way P f..A has prepared a Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study for the P AA. The P AA Subarea Plan has been incorporated as Chapter Eight, Potential Annexation. This 'Nark will produce two distinct blit interrelated products: a The Subarea Plan for integration in the F\VCP, containing contains policies and plans addressing the full range of land uses, capital facilities, public services, and environmental issues relating to the P AA. and an The Annexation Feasibility Study~ which has been incorporated by reference, that will guide the City and inform the citizens about the feasibility and phasing of any potential future annexations. A complete discussion regarding the City's PAA can be found in the Potential Annexation Area chapter. Natural Environment Federal Way's natural beauty is apparent. Lakes, streams, wetlands, and Puget Sound Revised 2002 11-7 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use provide a scenic backdrop as well as a source for active and passive recreation. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Federal Way's unique natural resources through policies that support the preservation of these areas for future generations. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter. Housing Housing is a basic need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families. An adequate supply of affordable, attractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a sense of community. The central issue related to land use is supplying enough land to accommodate projected growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is provided primarily in single-family subdivisions or multiple-unit complexes. This plan devises strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and encourage housing as part of mixed-use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing. A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter. City Center Map 11-1 depicts two City Center land use designations-the City Center Core and City Center Frame. The creation of an identifiable and vibrant "downtown" is one of the primary goals identified by the community during the CityShape planning process. The policies of the Land Use and City Center chapters envision a concentrated City Center comprised of mixed-use developments, pedestrian-oriented streetscapes, livable and affordable housing, a network of public spaces and parks, and development of superior design and quality. The City Center will provide a central gathering place for the community where civic and cultural activities and events take place. A complete discussion ofthe City Center can be found in the City Center Chapter. 2.3 POLICY BACKGROUND State and county land use policies provide a statutory framework for the development of City land use policies. It is important to briefly review state and county level policies to better understand historical conditions that have shaped the goals and policies in this chapter. Growth Management Act The Growth Management Act (GMA) acknowledges that, "...a lack of common goals Revised 2002 11-8 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use expressing the public's interest in conservation and the wise use of our lands pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of this state" (RCW 36.70A.OIO). The GMA provides a framework for content and adoption of local comprehensive plans. The GMA provides 13 goals to be, "... used exclusively for the purpose of guiding development of comprehensive plans and development regulations." A number of the GMA goals pertain to land use. They are as follows: Urban Growth - Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. Reduce Sprawl - Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development. Housing - Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of the state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. Open Space and Recreation - Encourage the retention of open space and development of recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks. Environment - Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality and the availability of water. Public Facilities and Services - Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. Historic Preservation - Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical or archaeological significance. Property Rights - Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions pursuant to state and federal law. Regional Policies Vision 2020 and the CWPPs, both required by GMA, provide a regional framework to achieve the goals of the GMA. Vision 2020 is the long-range growth management, economic, and transportation strategy for the central Puget Sound region encompassing King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. It provides broad direction agreed to by member jurisdictions. Most notable is Vision 2020's direction for regional transportation. An important connection between Vision 2020 policies and the City's land use policies is development of an urban center, referred to as the City Center Core in the FWCP. Urban Revised 2002 11-9 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use centers are to accommodate a significant share of new growth, services, and facilities. The idea is to, "... build an environment in the urban centers that will attract residents and businesses" by concentrating residences, shopping, and employment in close proximity to each other and regional transit. The CWPPs are a further refinement of policy direction contained in the GMA and Vision 2020 and are a result of a collaborative process between King County and the suburban cities within. Policies contained herein have been prepared to implement the CWPPs as they apply to the City. CWPPs provide a framework for both the county and its respective cities. Adherence to these policies ensures that plans within the county are consistent with one another. These policies address such issues as the designation of urban growth areas, land use, affordable housing, provision of urban services for future development, transportation, and contiguous and orderly development. CWPPs have the most direct impact on land use policies in this chapter. By undertaking the following actions, the Land Use chapter is consistent with CWPP's direction: # Promoting phased development for efficient use of land and urban services; # Creating a City Center (urban center) as an area of concentrated employment and housing, served by high capacity transit, public facilities, parks, and open space; # Limiting growth outside the City Center to areas that are already urbanized; # Encouraging in-fill development; # Expanding business and office park development to include limited commercial; and # Establishing incentives to achieve desired goals. 2.4 PROJECTED GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY Projected Growth According to the 2000 U.S. Census, 83,259 people called Federal Way home. As of April 2002, the population had grown to 83,850 (based on the Washington State Office of Financial Management [OFM] population estimates). Most of the growth to date occurred during the decades of the 1960s and 1980s, during which time the City's population doubled. Federal Way is now the eighth largest city in the state and the fourth largest in King County. Future population and employment growth has been forecasted by OFM (Figure II-3, page 10). This future population and employment growth will be distributed between jurisdictions and unincorporated urban King County through a methodology that has been prepared by Revised 2002 11-10 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use the King County Planning Directors and approved by the Growth Management Planning Population Projection King County 2.5 """'. .".......................,.... """..." 2 ~ c 0 :.= ~ 1.5 ....... c 0 j 1 1.16 :) Q. 0 Q. 0.5 """"" """""""""""""""""'" ... """"""""""""""""""""""'" ... a 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2025 Council (GMPC). This methodology is more fully discussed in the next section. Figure II-3 Source: Office or Financial Management, 2002 Update to Growth Management Act Medium Review Population Projections Development Capacity The purpose of Buildable Lands is to measure capacity to accommodate projected growth and to evaluate the effectiveness oflocal plans and regulations. King County and five other cities must report to the state by September 1, 2002, and every five years thereafter, on their capacity to accommodate growth during the 20-year Growth Management period. In order to accomplish this, the Buildable Lands program requires annual data collection to determine the amount and density of new development, an inventory of the land supply suitable for development, and an assessment of each jurisdiction and the entire Urban Growth Area (UGA) to accommodate expected growth. In order to determine whether Federal Way has the capacity to accommodate future growth, City staff prepared a land inventory of buildable lands. Buildable lands are those parcels that are either vacant or redevelopable and are free of constraints to development, such as being environmentally sensitive. The capacity for future development in terms of number of new housing units and square footage of new commercial square footage is then derived based on densities achieved by development over the previous five year period, 1996 through 2000. King County Assessor's records were used to identify vacant and redevelopable land. In general, parcels were divided into three categories: fully-developed and parcels that were excluded from the capacity analysis; parcels that could be redeveloped; and parcels that Revised 2002 11-11 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use were vacant. With the exception of surplus lands owned by public agencies, such as the City, county, state, and utility, school, and fire districts-parcels owned by public agencies were excluded from the capacity analysis, as they are unlikely to be developed for private use. Common areas and open space in subdivisions were also excluded from the inventory. Commercial and industrial zoned parcels categorized as redevelopable are those where the ratio of improvements to land value is less than 50 percent. In residential zones, redevelopable parcels are those parcels which can be subdivided, or where the density can otherwise be increased, for example, redeveloped from single-family to multiple-family. The City has mapped environmental constraints (such as wetlands, streams, and geologically hazardous areas) and their respective setbacks, and therefore, critical areas were taken out at a parcel level. The remaining lands were then summarized by zoning designation. A series of discounts were then further applied. These discounts included right-of-way and public purpose factors. In addition to the reductions outlined above, a market discount factor was applied on a case-by-case basis depending on local conditions. Application of the market factor (discount) acknowledges that not all potentially developable parcels will be available for development and that some parcels may not be financially feasible to develop or redevelop. This year, the methodology for capacity analysis was modified to conform to the Buildable Lands requirements. In the past, capacity analysis was based on the theoretical maximum development allowed by zoning. In the current analysis, densities achieved over the last five years were used. For residential areas, the average number of units per acre achieved was used, and for commercial areas, average attained floor area ratios (FAR) were used. Densities and F ARs were then divided into the available land totals for residential and commercial land respectively, to estimate development potential. For redevelopable areas, the current existing building area or number of units were subtracted in order to determine additional capacity. Lastly, the number of units or the building square footage of pending projects was added to the subtotals, for a final estimate of capacity. Based on this methodology, Federal Way has the capacity for 5,538 new residential units and 16,194 new jobs. 2001 - 2022 Household and Job Targets During their September 25,2002 meeting, the GMPC adopted a motion to add targets for new households and jobs for the period 2001 - 2022. These targets were based on a methodology developed over a two-year period by the King County Planning Directors. This methodology is summarized in the following section. King County was divided into four subareas. These four subareas are SeaShore, East King County, South King County, and Rural Cities. The City of Federal Way is part of the South King County Subarea that includes Renton, Burien, SeaTac, Tukwila,_Normandy Park, Des Moines, Kent, Covington, Maple Valley, Black Diamond, Federal Way, Auburn, Milton, Pacific, Algona, West Hill PAA, East Renton PAA, Fairwoodl Soos Revised 2002 11-12 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Creek P AA, and Southwest King County P AAs. The PSRC's 2000 to 2020 small area employment forecasts were used as a basis for allocating population forecasts to these subareas by applying the employment percentages to the OFM countywide population forecast so that the proportion of housing to jobs is balanced at a certain ratio. The household size of the various subareas were then determined based on the 2000 census, and adjusted downwards for 2022 based on the assumption that household sizes would decrease in the future. The household size for each subarea was used to determine how many new housing units would be needed to accommodate new population in 2022. Next, the remainder of the current household target by subarea at the end of2000 was compared to the new households needed to accommodate new population. If South King County were to achieve their remaining household 2012 target, this would actually exceed the number of households needed to accommodate the 2000 to 2022 projected new households for the subarea (Table II-I). As a result, the methodology proposed that South King County receive no new targets for the 2012 - 2022 target extension period. However, because South King County's remaining target of 50,430 households exceeded the 42,355 new households needed to accommodate 2001 - 2022 growth, the methodology proposed to credit the sub-regions the difference, thus reducing remaining targets. Table II-2 (page 13) shows the 2001 - 2022 household targets by jurisdiction in the South King County Subarea with the adjustment made for the credit. As in the case of the household target extensions, the starting point for employment allocations was forecast from estimates derived for each city by the PSRC 2000 to 2020 small area employment forecasts. Future employment was then allocated to jurisdictions based on location of current employment, as well as location of commercial and industrial zones. The adopted 2001 - 2022 job targets are shown in Table II-2. Table II-] Household Targets by King County Urban Subarea Subarea 1992-2012 Target Remainder New Household Additional Total Households 20 Year Achieved of Current Targets to Households to Accommodate Target 1993-2000 Target at Accommodate Needed Beyond 30- Year Population End of 2000 New 2000-2022 Current Target (1992-2022) Population SeaShore 57,905 16,375 41,530 56,369 14,839 72,744 East King 48,348 25,665 22,683 47,645 24,962 73,310 County South King 73,387 22,957 50,430 42,355 N/A 65,312 County Rural Cities 8,828 3,265 5,563 2,255 Na 5,520 Surplus (11,585) N/A Total 188,468 68,262 120,206 148,624 28,418 216,886 Revised 2002 11-13 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use S hID c S b Table II-2 H h Id dJ bT 2001 2022 out n2 ounty u area ouse 0 an 0 ar2ets, - Jurisdiction Number of Households Number of Jobs Algona 298 108 Auburn 5,928 6,079 Black Diamond 1.099 2,525 Burien 1,552 1,712 Covington 1,173 900 Des Moines 1,576 1,695 Federal Way 6,188 7,481 Kent 4,284 11,500 Milton 50 1,054 Maple Valley 300 804 Normandy Park 100 67 Pacific 996 108 Renton 6,198 27,597 SeaTac 4,478 9,288 Tukwila 3,200 16,000 Unincorporated King County 4,935 2,582 Total 42,355 89,500 Development Capacity and Targets As discussed in the previous sections, in 2001 when the data for the Buildable Lands Study was prepared, the City of Federal Way had a capacity for 5,538 new residential housing units and 16,194 new jobs. In comparison, the adopted 2001 - 2022 targets are 6,188 new residential units and 7,481 new jobs. As a result, at that time the City had an 8,713 surplus capacity for jobs and a deficit capacity of 650 residential units in relationship to its targets. Based on residential units in the pipeline today, the City now has a deficit capacity of 41 0 residential units. In order to increase residential capacity to meet the adopted targets, City staff will propose that a definition of density for conventional subdivisions be added to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions." The definition of density will be based on gross acreage, which should result in relatively more lots than presently allowed, based on the requirement for minimum lot sizes. In addition, City staff will continue to monitor the City's progress towards reaching its targets, and will propose additional changes to the City Council, if warranted. 2.5 URBAN DESIGN AND FORM In addition to guiding development, the Land Use chapter also guides the quality and character of the City's future development pattern through goals and policies related to the form, function, and appearance of the built environment. These goals and policies, related to quality development, serve and will continue to serve as a basis from which to develop Revised 2002 11-14 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use appropriate implementation measures. Design guidelines, adopted in 1996 and 1999 are used as an integral component of the development review process. Design guidelines address location and type of pedestrian amenities and public spaces; pedestrian and vehicle circulation; building setbacks, orientation, form, and scale; landscaping; and mixed-use design. Goal LUGI Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. Policies LUPI Use residential design performance standards to maintain neighborhood character and ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. LUP2 Use design and performance standards to achieve a greater range of housing options in multiple-family designations. LUP3 Use design and performance standards to create attractive and desirable commercial and office developments. 2.6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS The Land Use chapter provides the policy foundation for implementing zoning and development regulations. In developing policy concerning future land use regulations, or revisions to existing regulations, every effort has been made to instill certainty and efficiency in the development process. State legislation has focused on developing streamlined and timely permit processing. The City has conducted Developer Forums to solicit input regarding the City's permit processing system. Comments received during the Forums provided invaluable information to evaluate the City's permit system. In 2002, the City formed a stakeholders group that reviewed the City's permitting process and made recommendations on how to improve or modify the regulations and processes. Through the following policies, the City continues to strive to provide an efficient and timely review system. Goal LUG2 Develop an efficient and timely development review process based on a publici private partnership. Revised 2002 11-15 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use 2.7 Policies LUP4 LUP5 LUP6 LUP7 LUP8 Maximize efficiency of the development review process. Assist developers with proposals by continuing to offer preapplication meetings in order to produce projects that will be reviewed efficiently. Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to determine how to improve upon the permit review process. Integrate and coordinate construction of public infrastructure with private development to minimize costs wherever possible. Increase efficiency in the permit process by responding to state legislation concerning development review processes. CITYWIDE POLICIES Citywide policies apply to all FWCP designations. These general policies are intended to maintain the quality of the living and working environment and ensure that the interests, economy, and welfare of the community are considered. Policies LUP9 LUPI0 LUPll LUP12 LUP13 Designate and zone land to provide for Federal Way's share of regionally adopted demand forecasts for residential, commercial, and industrial uses for the next 20 years. Support a diverse community comprised of neighborhoods that provide a range of housing options; a vibrant City Center; well designed and functioning commercial areas; and distinctive neighborhood retail areas. Support the continuation of a strong residential community. Evaluate household and employment forecasts on a periodic basis to ensure that land use policies based on previous assumptions are current. Distribute park and recreational opportunities equitably throughout the City. Revised 2002 11-16 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use 2.8 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The land use designations in the FWCP recognize the relationships between broad patterns of land uses. The designations set forth locational criteria for each specific class of uses consistent with the long-term objectives of the FWCP. These designations provide the purpose and intent for specific zoning districts. The location of comprehensive plan land use designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan Designations Map (Map II- i). Residential Areas Single Family Federal Way is known for its quality single-family neighborhoods. This section contains goals and policies that will shape future development and protect or improve the character and livability of established neighborhoods. The demand for and development of single-family housing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Single-family development will occur as in-fill development of vacant lots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods and as subdivisions on vacant tracts of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for developing single-family subdivisions. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments, lot size averaging, zero lot line development,ßccessory dwelling units and special needs housing. Single Family Low Density The Single Family Low Density designation retains larger urban lots in order to avoid development pressure on or near environmentally sensitive areas and to retain areas that have unique area-wide circumstance. There are two notable locations: Spring Valley, located in the southern portion of the City; and along Puget Sound near Dumas Bay in the vicinity of Camp Kilworth and the Palisades Retreat property. The Single Family Low Density designation continues the historic application of low density zoning in areas that lack urban services and infrastructure. Moreover, the application of large urban lot zoning is appropriate to avoid excessive development pressures on or near environmentally sensitive areas as well as to serve as a buffer between adjacent land use designations of higher densities. Upon provision of urban services, such as water and sewer, an increase in density may be warranted. The Single Family Low Density designation in the Spring Valley and Dumas Bay areas have numerous environmentally sensitive features including, but not limited to: wetlands, flooding potential, geologically hazardous areas, streams (including salmonid habitat), and wildlife habitat, and groundwater infiltration potential. Due to the sensitive nature of this area, the Draft Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Plan recommends zoning of one Revised 2002 11-17 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use lot per five acres. Single Family Medium Density The Single Family Medium Density designation creates urban lots with a density range of one to three dwelling units per acre to avoid developing on or near environmentally sensitive areas. The Single Family Medium Density designation can be found along the Puget Sound shoreline and south of South 356th Street, both east and west of SR 99. Lot sizes of 35,000 and 15,000 square feet provide for a transition in density between land designated as Single Family High Density Residential and Single Family Low Density Residential. Some areas designated as Single Family Medium Density Residential still lack urban services and infrastructure. Upon provision of urban services, such as water and sewer, an increase in density may be warranted. The relatively large lot sizes along the Puget Sound shoreline areas are appropriate due to geological features including steep slopes and landslide hazards commonly associated with marine bluffs. As with the Single Family Low designation, the Single Family Medium designations south of South 356th are located in the West Branch Hylebos Creek Sub- Basin. As noted in the Single Family Low Density description, this sub-basin contains a number of environmentally sensitive areas. Single Family High Density A majority ofthe single-family residential land in the City is designated as Single Family High Density. Urban densities of approximately 4.5, 6.0, and 8.7 dwelling units per acre in the RS 9.6, RS 7.2, and RS 5.0 zoning districts respectively, provide for a range of housing densities. Single Family High Density residential designations are located within close and convenient proximity to neighborhood business centers, areas of existing or future employment, transit, and existing urban infrastructure and services. Future Single Family High Density development should have good access to collector and arterial streets. Goal LUG3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single-family neighborhoods. LUG3.1 Provide wide range of housing densities and types in the single-family designated areas. Policies LUP14 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single-family neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations. LUP15 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses. LUP16 Revise existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new single-family developments and in-fill. Revised 2002 11-18 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP17 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve single-family neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP18 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas to preserve the natural setting of Federal Way. LUP19 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single-family areas, provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. L UP20 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, water- courses, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, and lot size averaging. Multiple Family The multiple-family residential land use designation represents an opportunity to provide a range of housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth. The increase in population, decline in average family size, and increased cost of single-family homes have created heavy demand for new housing types. The Land Use chapter encourages the development of housing types, such as duplexes, townhouses, and condominiums in existing multiple-family areas and within mixed-use development in commercial areas. During the 1980s, the City's landscape changed, as a number oflarge apartment complexes were constructed. These apartments, often built without regard to scale or amenities, created a general dissatisfaction with the appearance of multiple-family development. In 1999, the City amended its Community Design Guidelines to address the appearance and scale of multiple family dwelling units. Incentives for creating desired development such as duplexes and townhouses should be considered. Multiple Family Multiple Family uses in large part are in areas currently zoned for multiple-family development. Designations of 3600, 2400, and 1800 square feet per dwelling unit, corresponding to densities of 12, 18, and 24 dwelling units per acre respectively, will continue to be used. Opportunities for new development will occur through redevelopment and build-out of remaining parcels. Residential design guidelines that address design and appearance of multiple-family developments were adopted in 1999. The primary goal of residential design guidelines is to develop multiple-family housing that is reflective of the community's character and appearance. Goal LUG4 Provide a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the Revised 2002 11-19 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Policies LUP21 L UP22 LUP23 LUP24 LUP25 community's needs and preferences. Allow and encourage a variety of multiple-family housing types in designated commercial areas, especially in the City Center Core and City Center Frame areas. Use design and performance standards for multiple-family developments to achieve integration in commercial developments. Performance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Support multiple-family development with transportation and capital facilities improvements. Multiple-family residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common open space. Variations in facades and rooflines should be used to add character and interest to multiple-family developments. Encourage the establishment of street patterns and amenities that encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use. Commercial Designations Existing commercial areas are auto-oriented and characterized by one-story low intensity development. In the future, these areas will become more intensively developed and pedestrian oriented, and in some designations, accommodate housing. Transforming existing areas into places where people want to live, shop, and work requires changes. Commercial areas should contain street furniture, trees, pedestrian shelters, well marked crosswalks, and buildings oriented to and along the street to provide interest and allow easy pedestrian access. General Policies for Commercial, Office, and Business Park The following general policies apply to all commercial, office, and business park designations. In some instances, specific goals and policies may follow a specific land use designation Policies LUP26 LUP27 LUP28 Provide employment and business opportunities by allocating adequate land for commercial, office, and business park development. Encourage development of regional uses in the City Center. Provide for a mix of commercial and residential uses in commercial areas. Revised 2002 11-20 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP29 L UP30 LUP31 LUP32 LUP33 LUP34 Use Community Design Guidelines to promote common open space, public art, and plazas in commercial and office developments. Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. Use Community Design Guidelines to encourage quality design and pedestrian and vehicle circulation in office, commercial, and business park developments. Use Community Design Guidelines to encourage commercial development to locate along street edge (where deemed appropriate) to provide pedestrian street access. Provide pedestrian access between developments and to transit stations. Identify and designate streets where on-street parking can be safely provided without unduly slowing traffic flow or jeopardizing traffic safety. Provide developer incentives for inclusion of housing in commercial projects. Business Park The Business Park designation encompasses the uses found in areas where large undeveloped and underdeveloped parcels, having convenient access to Interstate 5 and Highway 18, provide a natural location for business park development. The Business Park designation is intended to capture the demand for higher quality, mixed-use business parks which permit a mixture of light manufacturing, warehouse/distribution, office, and limited retail uses to serve the immediate needs in the area. In the past few years, the City has observed a marked increase in requests to change parcels from the Business Park designation to another comprehensive plan designation. As a result, the City should explore potential changes to the allowable mix of uses in the Business Park zone in order to meet changing market conditions. Goal LUGS Policies LUP3S LUP36 LUP37 Develop a quality business park area that supports surrounding commercial areas. Encourage quality, mixed-use development for office, manufacturing, and distribution centers. Develop business parks that fit into their surroundings by grouping similar industries in order to reduce or eliminate land use conflicts, allow sharing of public facilities and services, and improve traffic flow and safety. Limit retail uses to those that serve the needs of people employed in the area. Revised 2002 11-21 FWCP - Chapter Two, land Use Commercial City Center Core The intent of establishing the City Center Core is to create a higher density, mixed-use designation where office, retail, government uses, and residential uses are concentrated. Other uses such as cultural/civic facilities, community services, and housing will be highly encouraged. City Center Frame The City Center Frame designation will have a look and feel similar to the Core and will provide a zone of less dense, mixed-use development physically surrounding a portion of the City Center Core. Together, they are meant to complement each other to create a "downtown" area. A more detailed description, along with goals and policies regarding the City Center Core and Frame, can be found in the City Center chapter. Community Business The Community Business designation presently encompasses two major retail areas of the City. It covers the "strip" retail areas along SR-99 and the large "bulk" retail area found near the South 348th Street area, approximately between SR-99 and 1-5. Community Business allows a large range of uses and is the City's largest retail designation in terms of area. The Community Business designation generally runs along both sides of SR-99 from South 272nd to South 348th. A wide range of development types, appearance, ages, function, and scale can be found along SR-99. Older, single-story developments provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment. It may be appropriate to extend the Community Business designation to areas adjacent to the I-5/South 320th and I-5/SR 18 interchanges as part of the initial adoption of the PAA Subarea Plan or as part ofthe annual comprehensive plan amendment process. Due in part to convenient access and available land, the South 348th Street area has become a preferred location for large bulk retailers such as Eagle Hardware, Home Depot, and Costco. Due to the size of these facilities, the challenge will be to develop these uses into well functioning, aesthetically pleasing retail environments. To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionally attractive, revised development standards, applied through Community Business zoning and Community Design Guidelines, address design quality, mixed-use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site design, modulation, and setback requirements are also addressed. Through regulations in the Community Business land use chart, the size and scale of hotels, motels, and office uses have been limited in scale so as not to compete with the City Center. Goal LUG6 Transform Community Business areas into vital, attractive, mixed-use areas that appeal to pedestrians and motorists and enhance the community's image. Revised 2002 11-22 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Policies LUP38 LUP39 Encourage transformation of Pacific Highway (SR-99) Community Business corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. Encourage auto-oriented large bulk retailers to locate in the South 348th Street Community Business area. Neighborhood Business There are a dozen various sized nodes of Neighborhood Business located throughout the City. These nodes are areas that have historically provided retail and/or services to adjacent residential areas. The FWCP recognizes the importance of firmly fixed boundaries to prevent commercial intrusion into adjacent neighborhoods. Neighborhood Business areas are intended to provide convenient goods (e.g., groceries and hardware) and services (e.g., dry cleaners, dentist, bank) at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses. Developments combining residential and commercial uses provide a convenient living environment within these nodes. In the future, attention should be given to design features that enhance the appearance or function of these areas. Improvements may include sidewalks, open space and street trees, and parking either on street or oriented away from the street edge. The function of neighborhood business areas can also be enhanced by safe pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections to surrounding neighborhoods. The need to address expansion or intensification may occur in the future depending on population growth. Future neighborhood business locations should be carefully chosen and sized to meet the needs of adjacent residential areas. Goal LUG7 Policies LUP40 LUP41 LUP42 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Integrate retail developments into surrounding neighborhoods through attention to quality design and function. Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and semces. Encourage neighborhood retail and personal services to locate at appropriate locations where local economic demand and design solutions demonstrate compatibility with the neighborhood. Revised 2002 11-23 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP43 Retail and personal services should be encouraged to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. L UP44 Neighborhood Business centers should consist of neighborhood scale retail and personal services. LUP45 Encourage mixed residential and commercial development in Neighborhood Business designations where compatibility with nearby uses can be demonstrated. LUP46 Neighborhood Business areas should be served by transit. LUP47 The City shall limit new commercial development to existing commercial areas to protect residential areas. Commercial Recreation The Commercial Recreation designation acknowledges the unique recreational opportunity associated with the Enchanted Park property. Enchanted Park is an indoor/ outdoor amusement facility most noted for its water park. A pre annexation concomitant development agreement has established the comprehensive plan designation and zoning (Office Park-4) particular to Enchanted Park. Office Federal Way is well known for its quality office parks. Developments within the East and West Campus areas embody good design and are representative of desired future office park development. Office park development in West Campus is complemented by the Weyerhaeuser Corporate Headquarters in East Campus. Together, office and corporate park development will provide new job opportunities within the community. Professional Office The Professional Office designation is intended to allow for well-designed small-scale office development compatible to adjacent residential neighborhoods. Office Park The Office Park designation emphasizes high quality office development that allows for a mix of office and compatible manufacturing type activities. This classification also permits a limited amount of retail support services, along with the current mix of office and light manufacturing uses. Corporate Park The Corporate Park designation applies to the Weyerhaeuser Corporate Campus, generally located east of Interstate Highway 5. The property is a unique site, both in terms of its development capacity and natural features. Office Park designations with OP-l, 2, and 3 zoning and some residential designations Revised 2002 11-24 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use north of Highway 18 surround the Corporate Park designation. The Corporate_Park zone is currently being developed as corporate headquarters, offices, and ancillary uses. These types of developments are characterized by large contiguous sites containing landscaping, . open space, and buildings of superior quality. Development standards and conditions for the Corporate Park designation is unique to Weyerhaeuser's property and are outlined in a preannexation concomitant development agreement between the City and Weyerhaeuser Corporation. Goal LUG8 Create office and corporate park development that is known regionally for its design and function. Policy LUP48 Continue to encourage quality office development in the East Campus Corporate Park designation. 2.8.5 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Purpose The Shoreline Management Act (SMA) identifies seven land and water use elements that, if appropriate to the community, are to be dealt with in the development of area-wide shoreline goals. They include: shoreline use, economic development, public access, conservation, recreation, historical/cultural, and circulation. Master programs are also encouraged to include any other elements which, because of present uses or future needs, are deemed appropriate to effectuate the policy of the SMA. Residential land use of shorelines of the state within Federal Way makes up the largest share of the developed shorelines in the City. Much of the undeveloped shoreline is in private ownership, subdivided into small lots and presently zoned to allow for residential use. Because of present and future needs of residential shoreline use, goals and policies have been formulated as part of a residential element to guide and plan for that development. The following comprehensive set of shoreline goals provide the foundation and framework on which the balance of the master program has been based. These goals and policies are reflective of the level of achievement believed to be intrinsically desirable for all shoreline uses, needs, and developments, and establish a program policy commensurate with the intent and objectives of the SMA. The policies contained herein should be enforced through the applicable chapters of the FWCC. Revised 2002 11-25 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Shoreline Use Element An element which deals with the distribution, location, and extent of: 1) the use of shorelines and adjacent areas for housing, transportation, office, public buildings and utilities, education, and natural resources; 2) the use of the water for aquaculture and recreation; and 3) the use of the water, shoreline, and uplands for other categories ofland and water uses and activities not specified in this master program. Goal LUG9 Policies LUP49 LUP50 LUP51 LUP52 LUP53 LUP54 LUP55 LUP56 Preserve or develop shorelines, adjacent uplands, and adjacent water areas in a manner that assures a balance of shoreline uses with minimal adverse effect on the quality of life, water, and environment. Shoreline land and water areas particularly suited for specific and appropriate uses should be designated and reserved for such uses. Shoreline land and water uses should satisfy the economic, social, and physical needs of the regional population, but should not exceed the physical carrying capacity of the shoreline areas. Where appropriate, land and water uses should be located to restore or enhance the land and water environments. Like or compatible shoreline uses should be clustered or distributed in a rational manner, rather than allowed to develop haphazardly. Multiple uses of shoreline should be encouraged where location and integration of compatible uses or activities are feasible. Unique and fragile areas of the shoreline should be protected from uses or activities that will have an adverse effect on the land or water environment. Non-residential uses or activities that are not shoreline dependent should be encouraged to locate or relocate away from the shoreline. Federal Way shall consider the goals, objectives, and policies within the shoreline master program in all land use management actions regarding the use or development of adjacent uplands or the water areas, adjacent uplands and associated wetlands or streams within its jurisdiction where such use or development will have an adverse effect on designated shorelines. Revised 2002 11-26 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Public Access Element An element making provision for public access to publicly-owned shorelines and assessing the need for providing public access to shoreline areas. Goal LUGIO Increase public access to shoreline areas provided that private rights, public safety, and the natural shoreline character are not adversely affected. Policies LUP57 Development of public access should respect and protect the enjoyment of private rights on shoreline property. a. Shoreline access areas should be planned to include ancillary facilities such as parking and sanitation when appropriate. b. Shoreline access and ancillary facilities should be designed and developed to provide adequate protection for adjacent private properties. LUP58 Public access should be maintained and regulated. a. Public access should be policed and improved consistent with intensity of use. b. The provision to restrict access as to nature, time, number of people, and area may be appropriate for public pedestrian easements and other public access areas where there are spawning grounds, fragile aquatic life habitats, or potential hazard for pedestrian safety. c. Facilities in public shoreline access areas should be properly maintained and operated. LUP59 Design of access should provide for the public health, safety, and enjoyment. a. Appropriate signs should be used to designate publicly owned shorelines. b. Within the shoreline environment, pedestrian and non-motorized access should be encouraged. c. Public access to and along the water's edge should be available in publicly owned shorelines that are tolerant of human activity. LUP60 Priority for access acquisition should consider resource desirability, availability, Revised 2002 11-27 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP61 LUP62 LUP63 and proximity of population. a. A shoreline element in the parks acquisition and development program should be encouraged so that future shoreline access is acquired and developed by established criteria and standards as part of an overall master plan. Public access should be provided in new shoreline developments. a. There should be incentives to encourage private property owners to provide shoreline access. b. Public pedestrian easements should be provided in future land use authorizations, and in the case of Federal Way projects along lakes, streams, ponds, and marine lands, whenever shoreline features are appropriate for public use. Shorelines of the City that include, but are not limited to, any of the following conditions should be considered for pedestrian easements: 1. Areas of significant, historical, geological, and/or biological circumstances. 2. Areas presently being legally used, or historically having been legally used, by the public along the shoreline for access. 3. Where public funds have been expended on or related to the water body. Shorelines of the City should be available to all people for passive use and enjoyment. a. Viewpoints, lookouts, and vistas of shorelines of the City should be publicly accessible. b. New developments should minimize visual and physical obstruction of the water from shoreline roads and upland owners. General policies. a. Where appropriate, utility and transportation rights-of-way on the shoreline should be made available for public access and use. b. Publicly-owned street ends that abut the shoreline should be retained and/or reclaimed for public access. c. Shoreline recreational facilities and other public access points should be connected by trails, bicycle pathways, and other access links where Revised 2002 11-28 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use appropriate. d. Public pedestrian easements and access points should be of a nature and scale that would be compatible with the abutting and adjacent land use as well as natural features, including aquatic life. e. Access development should respect and protect ecological and aesthetic values in the shorelines of the City. Conservation Element An element which deals with the preservation of natural shoreline resources, considering, but not limited to, such characteristics as scenic vistas, park-ways, vital estuarine areas for fish and wildlife protection, beaches, and other valuable natural or aesthetic features. Goal LUGll Assure preservation of unique and non-renewable natural resources and assure conservation of renewable natural resources for the benefit of existing and future generations and the public interest. Policies LUP64 Shorelines that are of unique or valuable natural character should be acquired for public benefit, commensurate with preservation ofthe ecosystem. a. Unique and fragile areas in shoreline areas should be designated and retained as open space. Access and use should be restricted or prohibited when necessary for their preservation. b. When appropriate, Federal Way should acquire those shoreline areas which are unique or valuable. Subsequent use of such areas should be governed by their ecological carrying capacity. LUP65 All renewable natural resources should be managed so that use or consumption does not exceed replenishment. a. Through policies and actions, Federal Way should encourage the management and conservation of fish, shellfish, wildlife, and other renewable resources. LUP66 Resource conservation should be an integral part of shoreline planning. a. When feasible, Federal Way should initiate programs to reverse any substantial adverse impacts caused by existing shoreline development. Revised 2002 11-29 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP67 LUP68 LUP69 b. All future shoreline development should be planned, designed, and sited to minimize adverse impact upon the natural shoreline environment. Scenic, aesthetic, and ecological qualities of natural and developed shorelines should be recognized and preserved as valuable resources. a. When appropriate, natural flora and fauna should be preserved or restored. b. In shoreline areas, the natural topography should not be substantially altered. c. Shoreline structures should be sited and designed to minimize view obstruction and should be visually compatible with the shoreline character. d. Wildlife and aquatic habitats, including spawning grounds, should be protected, improved, and, if appropriate, increased. Resources should be managed to enhance the environment with minimal adverse effect. a. Aquaculture in shoreline areas should be conducted with all reasonable precautions to insure the preservation of the natural character and quality of the shoreline. b. Shoreline activity and development should be planned, constructed, and operated to minimize adverse effects on the natural processes of the shoreline, and should maintain or enhance the quality of air, soil, and water on the shoreline. c. Any structure or activity in or near the water should be constructed in such a way that it will minimize adverse physical or chemical effects on water quality, vegetation, fish, shellfish, or wildlife. d. Use or activity which substantially degrades the natural resources ofthe shoreline should not be allowed. Salmon and steelhead habitats support valuable recreational and commercial fisheries. These habitats should be protected because of their importance to the aquatic ecosystem and the state and local economy. a. Salmon and steelhead habitats are: 1. Gravel bottomed streams used for spawning; 2. Streams, lakes, and wetlands used for rearing, feeding, and cover and refuge from predators and high waters; Revised 2002 11-30 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use 3. Streams and salt water bodies used as migration corridors; and 4. Shallow areas of salt water bodies used for rearing, feeding, and cover and refuge from predators and currents. b. Non-water-dependent or non-water-related uses, activities, structures, and landfills should not be located in salmon and steelhead habitats. c. Where alternative locations exist, water-dependent and water-related uses, activities, structures, and landfills should not be located in salmon and steelhead habitats. d. Where uses, activities, structures, and landfills must locate in salmon and steelhead habitats, impacts on these areas should be lessened to the maximum extent possible. Significant unavoidable impacts should be mitigated by creating in-kind replacement habitat near the project where feasible. Where in-kind replacement mitigation is not feasible, rehabilitating degraded habitat may be required. Mitigation proposals should be developed in consultation with the affected local government, the Department of Fish eries, the Department of Wildlife, and affected Indian Nations. e. Developments which are outside salmon and steelhead habitats but which have the potential to significantly affect these habitats should be located and designed so they do not create significant negative impacts on salmon and steelhead habitats. f. Bioengineering is the preferred bank protection technique for rivers and streams used by salmon and steelhead. g. Open pile bridges are preferred for crossing water areas used by salmon and steelhead. h. Impervious surfaces shall be minimized in upland developments to reduce stonnwater runoff peaks. Structures and uses creating significant impervious surfaces shall include stormwater detention systems to reduce stormwater runoff peaks. 1. The discharge of silt into waterways shall be minimized during in-water and upland construction. J. Adopt-A-Stream programs and similar efforts to rehabilitate salmon and steelhead spawning streams are encouraged. k. Fishery enhancement projects are encouraged where they will not significantly interfere with other beneficial uses. 1. Project proponents should contact the Habitat Management Division ofthe Revised 2002 11-31 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Department of Fisheries, the Habitat Division of the Department of Wildlife or affected Indian Nations early in the development process to determine if the proposal will occur in or adjacent to a salmon and steelhead habitat. m. When reviewing permits for uses, activities, and structures proposed for salt water areas, streams, wetlands, ponds connected to streams, and shorelines adjacent to these areas; staff should contact the Habitat Management Division of the Department of Fisheries or the Habitat Division of the Department of Wildlife to determine if the proposal will occur in or affect an adjacent salmon or steelhead habitat. Staff should also contact affected Indian Nations. Recreation Element An element for the preservation and expansion of all types of recreational opportunities through programs of acquisition, development, and various means of less-than- fee acquisition. Goal LUG12 Provide additional shoreline dependent and water oriented recreation opportunities that are diverse, convenient, and adequate for the regional population consistent with the carrying capacity of the land and water resources. Policies LUP70 Areas containing special shoreline recreation qualities not easily duplicated should be available for public use and enjoyment. a. Opportunities should be provided for the public to understand natural shoreline processes and experience natural resource features. b. Public viewing and interpretation should be encouraged at or near governmental shorelim: activities when consistent with security and public safety. LUP71 Shoreline recreational use and development should enhance environmental quality with minimal adverse effect on the natural resources. a. Stretches of relatively inaccessible and unspoiled shoreline should be available and designated as low intensity recreational use areas with minimal development. Service facilities such as footpaths, periphery parking, and adequate sanitary facilities should only be allowed where appropriate. b. Beaches and other predominantly undeveloped shorelines already popular should be available and designated as medium intensity recreational use Revised 2002 11-32 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use LUP72 LUP73 areas to be free from expansive development; intensity of use should respect and protect the natural qualities of the area. c. Small or linear portions of the shoreline suitable for recreational purposes should be available and designated as transitional use areas that allow for variable intensities of use, which may include vista points, pedestrian walkways, water entry points, and access from the water; utilizing stream floodplains, street ends, steep slopes, and shoreline areas adjacent to waterfront roads. d. At suitable locations, shorelines should be made available and designated as high intensive use areas that provide for a wide variety of activities. e. Overall design and development in shoreline recreational areas should be responsive to the site characteristics of those areas and be consistent with the level of use in the area concerned. f. Recreation areas on the shoreline should have adequate surveillance and maintenance. g. The public should be provided with additional off-site and on-site guidance and control to protect shoreline resources. h. Where a wide berm is needed for dry beach recreation, and physical conditions permit sand retention, consideration should be given to creating a Class I beach 1 when such development does not destroy valuable biota or unique physical conditions. 1. Access to recreational shoreline areas afforded by water and land circulation systems should be determined by the concept of optimum carrying capacity and recreational quality. J. Non-water oriented recreational facility development should be kept inland away from the water's edge, except where appropriate in high intensive shoreline use areas. The provision of adequate public shoreline recreation lands should be based on an acquisition plan with a clear public intent. A balanced variety of recreational opportunities should be provided for people of different ages, health, family status, and financial ability. a. Appropriatespecialized recreation facilities should be provided for the developmentally disabled, or others who might need them. 'Pursuant to Federal Way City Code Chapter 18, Article III, Section 18-163, a "Class I beach means a beach or shore having dependable, geologicaIly fuIly developed, and normaIly dry backshore above high tide." Revised 2002 11-33 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use b. Shoreline recreation areas should provide opportunities for different use intensities ranging from low (solitude) to high (many people). c. Opportunities for shoreline recreational experiences should include developing access that accommodates a range of differences in people's physical mobility, capabilities, and skill levels. d. Shoreline recreational experiences should include a wide range of different areas from remote/outdoor undeveloped areas to highly developed indoor/ outdoor areas. e. Recreational development should meet the demands of population growth consistent with the carrying capacity of the land and water resources. Circulation Element An element dealing with the location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, and other public facilities; and coordinating those facilities with the shoreline use elements. Goal LUG13 Circulation systems in shoreline areas should be limited to those that are shoreline dependent or would serve shoreline dependent uses. The physical and social environment shall be protected from the adverse effect of those systems on the quality of water, life, or environment. Policies LUP74 New surface transportation development should be designed to provide the best possible service with the least possible infringement upon the shoreline environment. a. New transportation facilities and improvements to existing facilities that substantially increase levels of air, noise, odor, visual, or water pollution should be discouraged. b. Transportation corridors should be designed to harmonize with the topography and other natural characteristics of the shoreline through which they traverse. b. Surface transportation facilities in shoreline areas should be set back from the ordinary high water mark far enough to make unnecessary such protective measures as rip-rap or other bank stabilization, landfill, Revised 2002 11-34 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP75 LUP76 LUP77 LUP78 bulkheads, groins, jetties, or substantial site regrade. Circulation systems should be located and attractively designed so as not to unnecessarily or unreasonably pollute the physical environment or reduce the benefits people derive from their property; and they should encourage alternative routes and modes of travel. a. Motorized vehicular traffic on beaches and other natural shoreline areas should be prohibited. b. Transportation facilities providing access to shoreline developments should be planned and designed in scale and character with the use proposed. c. Circulation routes should provide for non-motorized means of travel. Circulation systems disruptive to public shoreline access and other shoreline uses should be relocated where feasible. a. Transportation elements disruptive to the shoreline character that cannot feasibly be relocated should be conditioned or landscaped to minimize visual and noise pollution. Shoreline circulation systems should be adaptable to changes in technology. a. Federal Way should promote and encourage modes of transportation that consume the least amount of energy while providing the best efficiency with the least possible pollution. General policies. a. New transportation developments in shoreline areas should provide turnout areas for scenic stops and off road rest areas where the topography, view, and natural features warrant. b. Shoreline roadway corridors with unique or historic significance, or of great aesthetic quality, should be retained and maintained for those characteristics. c. New transportation facilities crossing lakes, streams, or wetlands should be encouraged to locate in existing corridors, except where any adverse impact can be minimized by selecting an alternate corridor. Residential Element An element dealing with housing densities, residential subdivisions, shoreline access, necessary support services, and locations of single-family dwellings (including Revised 2002 11-35 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use manufactured homes) and multiple-family dwellings without distinction between part-time or full-time occupancy. Goal LUG14 Shoreline residential areas shall permit a variety of housing types and designs with densities and locations consistent with the ability of physical and natural features to accommodate them. Policies LUP79 Residential developments should be excluded from shoreline areas known to contain development hazards or which would adversely impact sensitive areas as identified in Chapter 18, Division 6 of the FWCc. a. Residential development should be prohibited within the 100-year floodplain. b. Residential development should be prohibited in areas of severe or very severe landslide hazard. c. Residential development should be regulated in shoreline areas with slopes of 40 percent or greater. d. Shoreline areas containing other potential hazards (e. g., geological conditions, unstable subsurface conditions, erosion hazards, or groundwater or seepage problems) should be limited or restricted for development. e. The burden of pro oft hat development of these areas is feasible, safe, and ecologically sound is the responsibility of the developer. LUP80 Residential developments should have minimal impact on the land and water environment of the shoreline and minimize visual and physical obstruction. a. Residential development should be regulated in identified unique and fragile areas as required under the City's sensitive areas regulations. b. Residential development on piers or over water should not be permitted. c. Landfill for residential development which reduces water surface or floodplain capacity should not be permitted. d. In residential developments the water's edge should be kept free of buildings and fences. e. Every reasonable effort should be made to insure the retention of natural shoreline vegetation and other natural features of the landscape during site Revised 2002 11-36 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use development and construction. LUP81 Residential use of shorelines should not displace or encroach upon shoreline dependent uses. LUP82 Residential densities should be determined with regard for the physical capabilities of the shoreline areas, public services requirements, and effects such densities have on the environment. a. Subdivisions and new development should be designed to adequately protect the water and shoreline aesthetic characteristics. b. New residential development should only be allowed in those shoreline areas where the provision for sewage disposal and drainage ways are of such a standard that adjoining water bodies would not be adversely affected by pollution or siltation. c. Residential development along shorelines should be set back from the ordinary high water mark far enough to make unnecessary such protective measures as filling, bulk heading, construction groins or jetties, or substantial regrading of the site. d. Residential developments should be designed to enhance the appearance of the shoreline and not substantially interfere with the public's view and access to the water. Shoreline Environments Purpose In order to more effectively implement the goals, objectives, and policies of this master program and the SMA, the shorelines of the state within Federal Way have been categorized into four separate environment designations. The purpose of these designations is to differentiate between areas whose geographical features and existing development pattern imply differing objectives regarding their use and future development. Each environment represents a particular emphasis in the type of uses and the extent of development that should occur within it. The system is designed to encourage uses in each environment which enhance the character of the environment while at the same time requiring reasonable standards and restrictions on development so that the character of the environment is not destroyed. The determination as to which designation should be given to any specific shoreline area has been based on, and is reflective of, the existing development pattern; the biophysical capabilities and limitations of the land; and the goals and aspirations of the local citizenry. Each environment category includes: (1) a definition describing the development, use, Revised 2002 11-37 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use and/or features which characterize the area; (2) a purpose which clarifies the meaning and intent of the designation; and, (3) general policies designed to regulate use and development consistent with the character of the environment. Urban Environment The urban environment is an area of high-intensity land use including residential, office, and recreational development. The environment is particularly suitable to those areas presently subjected to intensive land use pressure, as well as areas planned to accommodate urban expansion. The purpose of designating the urban environment is to ensure optimum utilization of shorelines within urbanized areas by permitting intensive use and by managing development so that it enhances and maintains the shoreline for a multiplicity of urban uses. The environment is designed to reflect a policy of increasing utilization and efficiency of urban areas, promote a more intensive level of use through redevelopment of areas now underutilized, and encourage multiple use of the shoreline if the major use is shoreline dependent. Policies L UP83 LUP84 LUP85 LUP86 LUP87 LUP88 LUP89 Emphasis should be given to development within already developed areas. Emphasis should be given to developing visual and physical access to the shoreline in the urban environment. To enhance the waterfront and insure maximum public use, commercial facilities should be designed to permit pedestrian waterfront activities consistent with public safety and security. Multiple use of the shoreline should be encouraged. Redevelopment and renewal of substandard areas should be encouraged in order to accommodate future users and make maximum use of the shoreline resource. Aesthetic considerations should be actively promoted by means of sign control regulations, architectural design standards, landscaping requirements, and other such means. Development should not significantly degrade the quality of the environment, including water quality and air quality, nor create conditions that would accentuate erosion, drainage problems, or other adverse impacts on adjacent environments. Rural Environment The rural environment is intended for shoreline areas characterized by agricultural uses, low density residential (where most urban services are not available), and areas which Revised 2002 11-38 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use provide buffer zones and open space between predominantly urban areas. Undeveloped shorelines not planned for urban expansion or which do not have a high priority for designation in an alternative environment, and recreational uses compatible with agricultural activities are appropriate for the rural environment. The purpose of designating the rural environment is to preserve agricultural land, restrict intensive development along undeveloped shorelines, function as a buffer between urban areas, and maintain open spaces and opportunities for recreational uses within the ecological carrying capacity of the land and water resource. New developments in a rural environment should reflect the character of the surrounding area by limiting density, providing permanent open space, and maintaining adequate building setbacks from the water to prevent shoreline resources fÌ"om being destroyed for other rural types of uses. Policies LUP90 LUP91 Recreational access to the shorelines should be encouraged. Recreational facilities should be located and designed to minimize conflicts with other activities. New development should reflect the character of the surrounding area by limiting residential density, providing permanent open space, and maintaining adequate building setbacks from the water. Conservancy Environment The conservancy environment consists of shoreline areas that are primarily free from intensive development. It is the most suitable designation for shoreline areas of high scenic or historical values, for areas unsuitable for development due to biophysical limitations, and for commercial forest lands. Conservancy areas are intended to maintain their existing character. This designation is designed to protect, conserve, and manage existing natural resources and valuable historic and cultural areas. The preferred uses are those which are nonconsumptive of the physical and biological resources of the area. Policies LUP92 LUP93 LUP94 LUP95 New development should be restricted to those that are compatible with the natural and biophysical limitations of the land and water. Diverse recreational activities that are compatible with the conservancy environment should be encouraged. Development that would be a hazard to public health and safety, or would materially interfere with the natural processes, should not be allowed. The flood hazard overzone regulations shall apply to development within flood plains. Revised 2002 11-39 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP96 Structural flood control devices should be strongly discouraged in the conservancy environment. LUP97 In areas with poorly draining soils, development should not be allowed unless connected to a sewer line. LUP98 Development should be regulated so as to minimize the following: erosion or sedimentation, the adverse impact on aquatic habitats, and substantial degradation of the existing character of the conservancy environment. Natural Environment The natural environment consists of areas characterized by the presence of some unique natural features considered valuable in their undisturbed or original condition and which are relatively intolerant of intensive human use. Such areas should be essentially free from development or be capable of being easily restored to natural condition, and they should be large enough to protect the value of the resource. The purpose of designating the natural environment is to preserve and restore those natural resource systems existing relatively free of human influence. These systems require severe restrictions of intensities and types of uses permitted so as to maintain the integrity of the natural environment. Policies LUP99 Natural areas should remain free from all development that would adversely affect their natural character. LUPIOO The intensity and type of uses permitted should be restricted in order to maintain the natural systems and resources in their natural condition. LUPIOI Limited access should be allowed to those areas in the natural environment. LUPIO2 Uses which are consumptive of the physical and biological resources, or which may degrade the actual or potential value of the natural environment, should be prohibited. LUPIO3 Uses and activities in locations adjacent to natural areas should be strictly regulated to insure that the integrity of the natural environment is not compromised. Shoreline Use Activities Purpose Shoreline use activities are specific uses, or groups of similar uses, that have been outlined by the Department of Ecology Final Guidelines as being characteristic of the shorelines of the state. They have been formulated as implementing tools to further carry out the intent Revised 2002 11-40 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use and policy of this master program and the SMA. They also represent a major criterion to be used in evaluating proposed development and alterations to the shoreline environment; with their ultimate influence, to a large extent, dependent upon how well they are enforced. The policies that make up each use activity have been founded on the premise that all reasonable and appropriate uses require regulatory control. Other provisions such as a view enhancement, public access, erosion control, water quality, long term benefits, and aesthetic considerations have also been reflected in policy statements. Shoreline uses and activities not specifically identified, and for which policies have not been developed, will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and will be required to meet the intent of the goals and objectives of this master program, the policy of the SMA, and shall be consistent with the management policy and character of the shoreline environment in which they propose to locate. Aquatic Resource Practices Of all facets of economic shoreline activity, production from fisheries is the most vulnerable to massive destruction from an error in environmental control. Close monitoring of water quality and an aggressive policy of pollution abatement and control are mandatory for full realization and sustenance of this economic base. Aquaculture addresses state hatcheries, commercial hatcheries and beds, and natural hatcheries and beds within Federal Way shorelines. Underwater aquaria are considered as aquaculture although the use is principally recreational. Aquaculture has two modes: I. The harvest of uncontained plant and animal populations that exist on the nutrients and foods available in the environment restock themselves according to the fecundity ofthe population, and survive as the food and nature allow. 2. Artificial stocking or raising of stock in feedlots or pens using selective breeding and controlled feeding programs for increasing production and rearing a uniform product. Pen culture requires confinement and the presence of fixed structures that compete for space. Pens, rafts, and hatcheries require certain environmental conditions to assure the survival of their contained populations. Some of these conditions are small wave forces, good flow, good water quality, temperature limits, good anchoring ground and accessibility, and, possibly, good natural food and nutrient supply. The confinement of fish or shellfish in concentration imposes an extreme biological load in a small area. Dense populations degrade water quality and deposit heavy fecal sediments below the pens or on the floor of embayments. The principal impacts of aquacultural activity within the shoreline are: Revised 2002 11-41 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use I. Pollutants in the water body such as fish, organic wastes, and additives for feeding and disease control. 2. Navigation hazards such as holding pens, rafts, nets, and stakes. 3. Watercourse alteration to supply water. 4. Netting and flooring of riverbeds for spawning channels. 5. Shoreline access limitations where shellfish are being protected and contained. Policies LUPIO4 Federal Way's support should be given to the State Departments of Fisheries and Game to improve stream conditions, open new spawning areas, and establish new fish runs. LUPIO5 Pens and structures for commercial aquaculture should not be located on Class I beaches, or swimming beaches. LUPIO6 Aquacultural enterprises should be located in areas that would not significantly restrict navigation. LUPIO7 In aquaculture enterprises, development of multiple aquaculture systems should be encouraged. LUPIO8 Aquacultural structures should use open pile construction where significant littoral drift occurs. LUPIO9 Prior to use of an area for aquacultural enterprises, consideration should be given to the capability of the water body to absorb potential wastes. L UPll 0 Shoreline areas having extremely high natural potential for aquaculture should be preserved for that purpose. Commercial Development Commercial development pertains generally to the use or construction of facilities for transaction and sale of goods and services as opposed to industrial development (treatment together with ports) which pertains to the design and fabrication of products. The principal impact factors upon the shoreline from commercial development are pollutants (e.g., erosion, sedimentary, chemical, and microbial) and aesthetic destruction. Erosive pollutants from commercial development are generated from surface runoff and both surface and sub-surface subsidence. Chemical pollution is derived from fuel spillage. Microbial loading arises from poor containment of organic wastes associated with human habitation and recreational activities. Revised 2002 11-42 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Policies LUPIll Consideration should be made ofthe effect a structure will have on scenic value. L UPII2 Commercial structures and ancillary facilities that are not shoreline dependent or water-oriented should be placed inland away from the immediate water's edge. LUP113 The use of porous materials should be encouraged for paved areas to allow water to penetrate and percolate into the soil. Use of holding systems should be encouraged to control the runoff rate from parking lots and rooftops. LUPl14 Commercial enterprises locating within shoreline areas should be constructed to withstand normal rain and flooding conditions without contributing pollution to the watercourse or shoreline. LUP115 Commercial development that is not shoreline dependent should provide a buffer zone of vegetation for erosion control. Utilities Few, if any, utility systems could be installed completely without coming under the jurisdiction of this master program. The focus of the policies in this section is on how these utility facilities within the shoreline environment can be planned, designed, constructed, maintained, and rehabilitated to be consistent with the intent of the SMA. Types of utility facilities in Federal Way vary from regional transmission by trunklines, pipelines, and transmission lines to subregional distribution facilities. These are essentially pipes and wires. Regional facilities generally are high voltage or high pressure systems with substantial potential impact in case of failure. Their impacts on the environment are also generally greater because of their scale and safety requirements. The types of utilities covered are communications (radio, TV, and telephone), energy distribution (petroleum products, natural gas, and electricity), water, sanitary sewers, and storm sewers. Policies LUP116 Utilities that lead to growth should not be extended into or along shorelines without prior approval of such extension by appropriate land use authority. LUP117 Utilities located in shoreline environments inappropriate for development should not make service available to those areas. LUP118 In developed shorelines not served by utilities, utility construction should be encouraged to locate where it can be shown that water quality will be maintained or improved. Revised 2002 11-43 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use LUPI19 Federal Way should be consulted prior to, or at the time of, application for construction of regional utility facilities to be located in or along shorelines. LUP120 Utility corridors crossing shorelines ofthe state should be encouraged to consolidate and concentrate or share rights-of-way where: a. Public access (including view) would be improved. b. Concentration or sharing would not hinder the ability of the utility systems to be installed, operated, or maintained safely. c. Water quality would be as good or better than if separate corridors were present. LUP121 Public access consistent with public safety and security should be encouraged where rights-of-way for regional utility facilities cross shorelines of the City. LUPI22 New utility facilities should be located so as neither to require extensive shoreline protection nor to restrict water flow, circulation, or navigation. LUP123 Utility facilities and rights-of-way should be selected to preserve the natural landscape and minimize conflicts with present and planned uses of the land on which they are located. LUP124 New utility routes should be designed to minimize detrimental visual impact from the water and adjacent uplands. LUPl2S New freestanding personal wireless service facilities are discouraged from locating within the shoreline environment. Shoreline Protection Shoreline protection is action taken to reduce adverse impacts caused by current, flood, wake, or wave action. This action includes all structural and nonstructural means to reduce these impacts due to flooding, erosion, and accretion. Specific structural and nonstructural means included in this use activity are bulkheads, rip-rap, bank stabilization, and other means of shoreline protection. The means taken to reduce damage caused by erosion, accretion, and flooding must recognize the positive aspects of each, so that the benefits of these natural occurrences will be retained, even as the problems are dealt with. Erosion does not exist without accretion of material eroded, be it a bench or a sandbar. Likewise, accretion cannot occur unless material has been eroded. Policies LUP126 Structural solutions to reduce shoreline damage should be allowed only after it is demonstrated that nonstructural solutions would not be able to reduce the Revised 2002 11-44 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use damage. LUPI27 Planning of shoreline protection should encompass sizable stretches of lake or marine shorelines. This planning should consider off-site erosion, accretion, or flood damage that might occur as a result of shoreline protection structures or activities. LUP128 . Shoreline protection on marine and lake shorelines should not be used as the reason for creating new or newly usable land. LUP129 Shoreline protection structures should allow passage of ground and surface waters into the main water body. LUP130 Shoreline protection should not reduce the volume and storage capacity of rivers and adjacent wetlands or flood plains. LUP131 Whenever shoreline protection is needed, bioengineered alternatives such as natural berms and erosion control vegetation plans should be favored over hard surfaced structural alternatives such as concrete bulkheads and sheet piles. LUP132 The burden of proof for the need for shoreline protection to protect existing or proposed developments rests on the applicant. LUP133 Shoreline protection activities that may necessitate new or increased shoreline protection on the same or other affected properties where there has been no previous need for protection should be discouraged. LUP134 New development should be encouraged to locate so as not to require shoreline protection. LUP13S Areas of significance in the spawning, nesting, rearing, or residency of aquatic and terrestrial biota should be given special consideration in reviewing of shoreline protection actions. LUP136 Shoreline protection actions should be discouraged in areas where they would block beach parent material. LUP137 Multiple uses of shoreline protection structures or nonstructural solutions should be encouraged. Transportation Facilities The circulation network use category addresses transportation facilities such as roads, railroads, bridges, trails, and related facilities. The impact of these facilities on shorelines can be substantial. Some existing facilities were constructed to serve transportation needs of the moment with a minimum expenditure and very little assessment of their primary or secondary impacts on shoreline aesthetics, public access to the water, and resultant effects on adjacent properties and water quality. Planning for new transportation facilities within Revised 2002 11-45 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use the shoreline area today requires a greater awareness of the environmental impacts transportation facilities will have on shorelines, in addition to the necessity for integrating future shoreline land use plans with the transportation system that serves developments on the shoreline. Policies LUP138 Pedestrian access should be built where access to public shorelines is desirable and has been cut offby linear transportation corridors. New linear facilities should enable pedestrian access to public shorelines where access is desirable. LUP139 New surface transportation facilities not related to, and necessary for the support of, shoreline activities should be set back from the ordinary high water mark far enough to make unnecessary protective measures such as rip rap or other bank stabilization, land-fill, bulkheads, groins, jetties, or substantial site regrade. LUP140 Shoreline transportation facilities should be encouraged to include in their design and development multi-modal provisions where public safety can be assured. LUP141 Shoreline transportation facilities should be planned to fit the topography and minimize cuts and fills; and should be designed, located, and maintained to minimize erosion and degradation of water quality and to give special consideration to shoreline aesthetics. LUP142 Transportation and utility facilities should be encouraged to coordinate joint use of rights-of-way and to consolidate crossings of water bodies when doing so can minimize adverse impact to the shoreline. LUP143 Transportation facilities should avoid shoreline areas known to contain development hazards (e.g. slide and slump areas, poor foundation soils, marshes, etc.). LUP144 Transportation facilities should minimize shoreline rights-of-way by orienting generally perpendicular to the shoreline where topographic conditions will allow. LUP14S Shoreline roadways should have a high priority for arterial beautification funds. LUP146 Abandoned road or railroad rights-of-way that contain unique shoreline amenities should be acquired for public benefit. LUP147 Federal Way should extend its trail and bicycle trail system, particularly as it relates to shorelines, to western Federal Way. LUP148 All transportation facilities in shoreline areas should be constructed and maintained to cause the least possible adverse impacts on the land and water Revised 2002 11-46 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use environments, should respect the natural character of the shoreline, and should make every effort to preserve wildlife, aquatic life, and their habitats. Piers and Moorages A pier is a structure built over or floating upon the water extending from the shore. Some are used as a landing place for marine transport or for recreational watercraft. Piers are designed and constructed as either water (floating) or pile supported, both of which have positive and negative environmental aspects. Floating piers generally have less of a visual impact than those on piling and they provide excellent protection for swimmers from boat traffic. Floating piers however, interrupt littoral drift and can starve down current beaches where pile piers do not. Pile piers can provide a diverse habitat for marine life. Both types can create impediments to boat traffic and near-shore trolling. Pier construction requires regulation to protect navigation rights, preserve shoreline aesthetics, and maintain the usable water surface and aquatic lands for life forms characteristic and important to those areas. Policies L UP149 Open pile pier construction should be preferred where there is significant littoral drift, where scenic values will not be impaired, and where minimal alteration to the shoreline and minimal damage to aquatic resources can be assured. LUP1S0 Floating pier construction should be preferred in those areas where scenic values are high. LUP1SI Piers should be discouraged where conflicts with recreational boaters and other recreational water activities would be created by pier construction. LUP1S2 The random proliferation of single purpose piers should be discouraged. Preference should be given to shared use of piers in all shoreline areas. LUP1S3 Temporary moorages should be permitted for vessels used in the construction of shoreline facilities. The design and construction of such moorages shall be such that upon termination of the project the aquatic life can be returned to their original condition within one year at no cost to the environment or the public. LUP1S4 Shoreline structures that are abandoned or structurally unsafe should be abated. LUP1SS Substantial additions or alterations, including but not limited to substantial developments, should be in conformance with the policies and regulations set forth in the master program. LUP1S6 Piers, docks, buoys, and other moorages should only be authorized after consideration of: a. The effect such structures have on wild-life and aquatic life, water quality, scenic and aesthetic values, unique and fragile areas, submerged lands, and shoreline vegetation. Revised 2002 11-47 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use b. The effect such structures have on navigation, water circulation, recreational and commercial boating, sediment movement and littoral drift, and shoreline access. LUP1S7 Moorage buoys should be preferred over floating and pile constructed piers on all tidal waters. LUP1S8 Floating structures and open pile structures are preferred over landfills or solid structures in water areas used by salmon and steelhead. Recreation Recreational experiences that depend on, or utilize, the shoreline include: harvesting activities offish, shellfish, fowl, minerals, and driftwood; various forms of boating, swimming, and shoreline pathways; and watching or recording activities, such as photography, painting, or the viewing of water dependent activities. Principal focal points are at parks and access beaches, road ends, viewpoints, features of special interest, water- access points, and destination points for boaters. Facilities at these focal points may include fishing piers, swimming floats, paths, parking areas, boat ramps, moorings, and accessory recreational facilities. The management of recreational land is determined by balancing the recreational carrying capacity (or impact of the environment on people) and the ecological carrying capacity (the impact of people on the environment). Measures to accomplish this are by designation of areas for use-intensity, interpretation, and regulation. These different recreational use areas coincide with the four environmentsCnatural, conservancy, rural, and urban. There are multiple benefits derived from the park program, for example: recreational lands contribute substantially to open space by conservation of land, preserving historic sites, offering aesthetic relief and variety, contributing to a healthful environment, and shaping and preserving the community form. In addition to the provisions of recreational opportunities, Federal Way coordinates with other governmental agencies, commercial, and volunteer groups to provide these opportunities for the public. The policies are directed toward providing shoreline dependent and water oriented recreational opportunities. They are also directed at protecting health and safety by separating incompatible activities and channeling them into their most appropriate environments. Policies LUPIS9 The development of recreational acquisition plans should give emphasis to the acquisition of prime recreation lands prior to their being preempted for other uses. LUP160 In open spaces having an established sense of nature, improvements should be limited to those that are necessary and unlikely to detract from the primary values of the site. LUP161 The siting of all developments should aim to enhance and protect the area Revised 2002 11-48 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use concerned. LUPI62 Structural forms should harmonize the topography, reinforce the use area, minimize damage to natural resources, and support recreation with minimal conflict. LUPI63 New buildings should be made sympathetic to the scale, form, and proportion of older development to promote harmony in the visual relationships and transitions between new and older buildings. LUP164 Whenever possible, natural materials should be used in developing shoreline recreational areas. LUP16S Artificial irrigation and fertilization should be restricted to high-intensity use areas. LUP166 Existing buildings that enhance the character of the shoreline should be used for recreation wherever possible. LUP167 Underwater parks should be extensions of shoreline parks, or be created or enhanced by artificial reefs where natural conditions or aquatic life could be observed with minimal interference. LUP168 Public recreational shoreline areas should serve as emergency havens of refuge for boaters. LUP169 Physical and/or visual access to the water should use steep slopes, view points from bluffs, stream valleys, and features of special interest where it is possible to place pathways consistent with public safety without requiring extensive flood or erosion protection. LUP170 The acquisition of public easements to the shoreline through private or quasi- public shorelines should be encouraged. LUP171 Existing public recreation shorelines should be restored where it is possible to revegetate; resite roads and parking areas that are close to the shoreline; and remove stream channelization and shoreline protection devices when the facility has either deteriorated or is inconsistent with the general goals of this program. LUPIn Prime-fishing areas should be given priority for recreational use. L UP173 Boating activities that increase shore erosion should be discouraged. L UP17 4 Effective interpretation should be provided to raise the quality of visitor experiences and provide an understanding of the resource. Residential Development Revised 2002 11-49 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use The shorelines in Federal Way are more widely used for residential purposes than for any other use. Much of the undeveloped shoreline is privately owned, subdivided into small lots, and zoned to permit residential development. The pressure to develop shorelines for residential uses has continued to result in property subdivision and escalating waterfront land values. Residential development of shorelines is accomplished in a variety of ways from large plats and subdivisions to single lot development for housing; any of which, if poorly planned, can culminate in the degradation of the shoreline environment and water resource. . The SMA generally exempts, ".. . construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single-family residence for his own use or the use of his family..." from its permit requirements. However, even though single-family homes are not considered substantial developments, the intent of the act has established the basis for planning and regulating them. Policies LUP17S Residential developments should be permitted only where there are adequate provisions for utilities, circulation, access, site layout, and building design. LUP176 Subdivisions should be designed at a level of density, site coverage, and occupancy compatible with the physical capabilities of the shoreline and water body. LUP177 Residential development plans submitted for approval should contain provisions for protection of groundwater supplies, erosion control, landscaping, and maintenance of the shoreline integrity. LUP178 Residential subdivisions should be designed so as to protect water quality, shoreline aesthetic characteristics, vistas, and normal public use of the water. LUP179 Subdivisions should provide public pedestrian access to the shorelines within the development in accordance with public access element of this master program. LUP180 The established velocity, quantity, and quality of stormwater discharge should be considered in terms of the sensitivity of the proposed receiving environment. The disposal mode selected should minimize changes in infiltration, runoff, and groundwater recharge. LUP181 Developers of recreational projects such as summer homes, cabins, campgrounds, and similar facilities should satisfactorily demonstrate: a. The suitability of the site to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting the shoreline environment and water resource. Revised 2002 II-50 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use b. Adequate provisions for all necessary utilities, including refuse disposal, and the compatibility of the development with adjacent properties and surrounding land uses. c. That recreational opportunity exists on the site and does not depend on adjacent public land to furnish the activity. 2.9 ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES Pursuant to the GMA, no comprehensive plan can preclude the siting of essential public facilities and each should include a process for siting essential public facilities. The GMA includes these provisions because siting certain public facilities has become difficult due to the impacts many of these facilities have on the community. In Chapter 22 of the FWCC, the City has defined essential public facilities and provided a land use process for siting them. Essential public facilities include those facilities that are typically difficult to site, such as airports, state or regional transportation systems, correctional facilities, and mental health facilities. Policy LUP182 The FWCC shall include a list oflocally defined essential public facilities that shall include the list of essential state public facilities maintained by the office of financial management. 2.10 PHASING Phasing focuses growth to those areas where public investments for services are targeted. By doing so, these areas become more attractive for development. Consistent with the CWPPs, Federal Way proposes to use a tiered system for accommodating future growth. The primary purpose of this technique is to assure a logical sequence of growth outward from developed areas. Future growth will be directed to the City Center and other areas with existing infrastructure and urban services. This will be followed by focusing growth to areas where in-fill potential exists. Lastly, growth will be directed toward areas of undeveloped land or to the City's P AA. For those areas of the City that are lacking services, these lands should be retained or reserved until build out has occurred in developed areas. Based on the phased growth concept outlined above, the City should develop criteria for a phasing plan over the next 10 and 20 years. Phased growth will promote efficient use of Revised 2002 II-51 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use land by: # Reducing taxpayers costs by locating new development nearest to existing urban servIces; # Adding predictability to service & facility planning; # Reducing commuter miles and protecting air quality by locating housing and jobs near each other; # Encouraging in-fill and redevelopment where environmental impacts have already occurred; and # Reserving land for future parks and open space. Policies LUP183 Establish priority areas for public facility and service improvements, especially for transportation. Priority areas should be located where public facility and service improvements would effectively advance Federal Way's growth vision. Priority areas will shift over time as improvements are installed and an acceptable level of service is attained. LUP184 When and where service deficiencies are identified, the City, along with service providers, will develop capital improvement programs to remedy identified deficiencies in a timely fashion or will phase growth until such programs can be completed. LUP18S Work with King County through the development of an interlocal agreement to assign phasing to the City's P AA. LUP186 The City should limit spending on capital facilities in those areas of the City and P AA that are not designated as priority areas for capital projects. 2.11 INCENTIVES In certain designations, incentives allowing more development than otherwise permitted should be used to encourage features that provide a public benefit and/or contribute to the mitigation of growth impacts. For example, development in the City Center that provides common open space or affordable housing units, may gain additional floors or a reduction in the number of parking stalls. In addition, in order to encourage development in the City Center, the City is in the process of discussing a Housing Tax Exemption for multiple Revised 2002 II-52 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use family housing and is considering preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a portion of the City Center. Incentives can play an important role in the development of the City Center and must be substantial enough to influence market conditions by making them attractive to the development community. Policies LUP187 Develop incentives to encourage desired development in commercial areas, especially in the City Center Core and Frame. LUP188 Consider incentives for desired multiple-family residential development (townhouses, duplexes, etc.). 2.12 HISTORIC RESOURCES Historic preservation involves the identification, maintenance, renovation, and reuse of buildings and sites important to a community's history. Buildings or sites may be associated with a particular style or period in the community's past, or with historic or significant historic events or persons. Historic preservation to date has largely been undertaken by the Historical Society of Federal Way. Historic preservation is listed as the 13th goal in the GMA which encourages jurisdictions to, "Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance. " Goal LUGIS Use historic resources as an important element in the overall design o/the City. Policies LUP189 Identify vista points and landmarks such as major trees, buildings, and land forms for preservation. LUP190 Develop a process to designate historic landmark sites and structures. Use developer incentives or other mechanisms to ensure that these sites and structures will continue to be a part of the community. L UPI91 Recognize the heritage ofthe community by naming (or renaming) parks, streets, and other public places after major figures and/or events. LUPI92 Zoning should be compatible with and conducive to continued preservation of historic neighborhoods and properties. Revised 2002 II-53 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use LUP193 Safeguard and manifest Federal Way's heritage by preserving those sites, buildings, structures, and objects which reflect significant elements of the City's history. LUP194 Catalog historic sites using the City's geographic information system. LUP19S Undertake an effort to publicly commemorate historic sites. LUP196 The City shall continue to work with the Historical Society of Federal Way towards attainment of historic resource policies. 2.13 IMPLEMENTATION The following actions are recommended to implement the policy direction outlined in this chapter. Implementation will occur over time and is dependent on resources available to the City and community. The following items are not listed in order of importance or preference. Establish Comprehensive Planning and Zoning for Potential Annexation Area Comprehensive planning and the assignment of zoning designations should be completed for the City's P AA. This will provide the City with needed direction relating to future annexations and growth. Planning for this area pursuant to WAC 365-195 requires a considerable planning effort and policy development. An interlocal agreement between King County and the City regarding planning actions should be prepared. Residential Code Revisions for Multiple Family Residential code revisions to implement design standards for multiple-family residential development were adopted in late 1998. Subdivision Code Revisions Amendments to the subdivision code have been adopted to bring the code into compliance with state law and recent state legislation. Revisions to the subdivision code have provided platting options for single-family development, such as clustering and zero lot line development. Area-Wide Rezone Following adoption of the 1995 FWCP, a new zoning map was prepared and adopted to support the comprehensive plan designations. This update includes some site specific requests for changes to comprehensive plan designations. The zoning map will be amended to conform to the changes in land use designations. The Land Use Plan and Zoning Code Revised 2002 II-54 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use Implementation of policies and goals of the Land Use chapter is done in large part through the zoning code. Following adoption of the 1995 FWCP, the City made revisions to the zoning code, consistent with FWCP direction. The zoning conversion chart, Table II-3 (page 55), shows the connection between the various zoning designations and the comprehensive plan designations. Phasing Plan A phasing plan shall be prepared to prioritize areas of new growth based on available and proposed infrastructure improvements. Project Environmental Impact Statement for City Center To facilitate growth in the City Center and Frame, the City should complete Planned Action SEP A (PAS). By doing so, development consistent with the direction outlined in the PAS will not have to go through prolonged environmental review. This can be a powerful incentive for private development in the City Center. Subarea Plans Over the years, citizens from various areas of the City have come forth to testify before the Planning Commission and City Council regarding their neighborhood or business area. Development of subarea plans can lead to area specific visions and policies. This type of specific planning, developed with citizen input and direction, can lead to improved confidence and ownership in the community. Areas where subarea planning should be considered include: SR-99 Corridor, South 348th Street area, and Twin Lakes neighborhood. Incentives Develop an incentives program, for both residential and commercial development. Incentives should be substantial enough to attract development and should be used to create affordable and desired types of housing and to encourage development within the City Center. u Comprehensive Plan Classification Zoning Classification Single Family - Low Density Residential Suburban Estates (SE), one dwelling unit per five acres Single Faniily - Medium Density Residential RS 35,000 & 15,000 Single Family - High Density Residential RS 9600, 7200, 5000 Multiple Family Residential RM 3600, 2400, 1800 City Center Core City Center Core City Center Frame City Center Frame Office Park Office Park, Office Park 1, 2, & 3 Professional Office Professional Office Community Business Community Business Business Park Business Park Table II-3 Land Use Classifications Revised 2002 II-55 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use Neighborhood Business Neighborhood Business Corporate Park Corporate Park-l Commercial Recreation Office Park-4 Open Space & Parks A variety of zoning is assigned. Revised 2002 II-56 ~ir' PugetSound CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS REVISED MARCH, 2003 LANDUSE ELEMENT ¡\' Federal Way City Umils 1\' Potential Aonexation Area - City Center Core - City Center Frame - Corporate Park IiIIIIIIII Office Park ~ Professional Office ~ CommerciaJlRecreation c:::a Business Park - Neighborhood Business - Community Business - Parks and Open Space - Multi-Family c::::J Single Family-High Density IiE1 Single Family-Medium Density c::::J Single Family-Low Density -SCAlE- 1 Inch equals 3,750 Feøt ~ Federal Way MAP 11-1 NOTE: This map is inten~ed Ie r use as a graphical representation anI)'. ibe CIIy '" Fi!deral Way mat!18 no warranty sa 1D hi aœur3CY Mo, "'",d Febrlllry '000 r_I>8"""'..."".","" .-:t~' PugetSound CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GENERALIZED EXISTING LAND USE lANDUSE ELEMENT ,., Federal Way City Umits /'" Potential Annexatlon Area ",' Other City Limits N County Boundary ",' Federal Way City Center iOrS Agriculture - Commercial - Industrial - Olllce I!I!!!!I!II Public Pcuk IüiII R861denllal - Multi-Family c:J R86idential. Single Family Œ33TI Open Space, Common Areas, and Drainage - Quasi Public (i.e. så1ools. govemmentservlces. ate.) ITIJIJ Vacant ~ Recreation .. UtiUties -""."'-"Y"-~. ".........don"" ""_... ~_Mo_h""'- 1:".~:t!:."o::..WD_n -SCALE- 1 .ch ....,.11 4.000 Flot ~. F'ëderal Way MAP 11-2 NOTE: This map is inten~ed f1H use as a graphical representation anly. 1111 CIIy at f!dlral Way maleos no wMranty ,&m hi IIXUracy U'p prl"" Apll2lJO2 '_bl"","""",~..1 EXHIBIT c CHAPTER FOUR - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4.0 INTRODUCTION The Growth Management Act (GMA) includes economic development as one of its basic goals and it is a theme that runs throughout the GMA. It considers the need to stimulate economic development throughout the state, but requires that these activities be balanced with the need to protect the physical environment. It encourages the efficient use of land, the availability of urban services, and the financing strategies necessary to pay for infrastructure. Finally, the GMA mandates that communities do their planning and then provide the zoning and regulatory environment so that appropriate development can occur. It recognizes that while the public sector can shape and influence development, it is the private sector that generates community growth. The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) has also adopted region-wide goals and objectives to guide multi-jurisdictional transportation and land use policies that will be implemented through local comprehensive plans. Economic development is implicit in many of the goals and objectives of VISION 2020. The VISION 2020 strategy emphasizes that continued economic stability and diversity is dependent upon public and private sector collaboration to identify needs, such as infrastructure and land, and to invest in services that will promote economic activity. VISION 2020 also emphasizes that the stability of the regional economy increases when it develops and diversifies through the retention and strengthening of existing businesses and the creation of new business. King County, through its growth management planning policies and process, re- emphasizes the economic development implications of growth management. The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs) promote the creation of a healthy and diverse economic climate. The CWPPs describe the need to strengthen, expand, and diversify the economy. They encourage protection of our natural resources and enhancement of our human resources through education and job training. The CWPPs also speak to the need to make an adequate supply of land available for economic development by providing necessary infrastructure and a reasonable permitting process. Within this policy framework, Federal Way has outlined a vision of its economic development future. Its vision is to transform itself from largely a bedroom-community of Seattle into a diversified, full-service, and self-contained city (Map IV-I, located at the end of the chapter). However, in doing so, it is important to remember that Federal Way is part of the larger Puget Sound economy, and therefore, this transformation will depend in large part on the market forces at work within the greater region. To achieve this vision, the City must diversify its employment base by adding more professional and managerial jobs, and by increasing the overall number of jobs in order to improve the balance between jobs and households in the City. The potential is there. Federal Way's unique location between the two regional centers of Seattle and Tacoma, both with large concentrations of population and large, successful ports, and its relationship within the FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Central Puget Sound region represent significant opportunities. The City is also home to Weyerhaeuser's Corporate Headquarters, located within East Campus, and the West Campus Office Park, two of the premier office park areas in the region. In addition, the City holds unique regional attractions for entertainment and recreation, such as Celebration Park, King County Aquatic Center, and Six Flags Enchanted Parks/Wild Waves. The City's economic development vision is based on the following: 1) economic and demographic analysis; 2) market analysis oflong-term real estate development in Federal Way; 3) synthesis ofreal estate and development trends in the Central Puget Sound area; and 4) review and comment from the Planning Commission. 4.1 SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS Overview Since the last update to this chapter of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), there have been significant changes in the local, regional, national, and international economic conditions. Previously riding a sustained, strong economic wave associated with extraordinary growth in the high-tech industries, strong growth in the airline industry, and generally positive national and international perceptions of the Pacific Northwest, the Seattle- Tacoma metropolitan region, and the State of Washington, Washington began to show early signs of an economic downturn by mid-200 I. Riots in nearby Seattle, first associated with the meeting of the World Trade Organization in November 1999, and later with the 200 I Mardi Gras festivities, had begun a series of negative publicity images of Seattle and the Seattle area. This negative publicity was exacerbated by the February 28,2001, Nisqually Earthquake, and later in 2001 by the Boeing Company's announcement that it was moving its corporate headquarters to Chicago. In addition, by mid-200 1, the national economy had begun to slow down, the "dot-com" industry had suffered a generalized melt-down, and the Pacific Rim countries, upon which so much of this state's trade depends, continued to slide further into their own recessions. The effects ofthe September 11,2001, terrorist attacks on this country jolted the economies of most of the world's countries and regions, but had a particularly hard impact on the Puget Sound region. As air-travel-related commerce plummeted worldwide, the Boeing Company, its affiliates, and related industries, saw sharp drops in orders, and Boeing announced its intentions to lay off tens of thousands of workers over the ensuing two years. By the beginning of 2002, lay-offs around the Puget Sound region became a commonplace occurrence, stemming from cutbacks at Boeing, other companies related to the airline and travel industries, and numerous "dot-com" and high-tech companies. However, according to the 2002 King County Annual Growth Report, the King County Revised 2002 IV-2 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development economy remains strong despite severe shocks. Unemployment has risen to 6.2 percent as of June 2002, but that level is no worse than the historical average. Aerospace employment in the Puget Sound region now stands at 72,000, with about 47,000 ofthat in King County. Although well below its record employment levels, the aerospace sector continues to provide high wages to local workers. High tech continues to expand despite the shakeout of a few companies. Other services, wholesale, and retail lost employment before the recession hit aerospace, so they may be ready to grow again in the coming year. The significant overall income growth in software and other sectors propelled King County into eighth place among all 3,100 counties in the United States in total payroll paid during 1998. Measured at $41 billion by the Census Bureau, King County's total business payroll exceeded that of 26 states, including Oregon, which has twice as many people as King County. Among other issues raised by such large numbers is that ofthe disparity of wealth and income between King County and the other parts of Washington State outside the Puget Sound region. In 1998, more than 52 percent of wages paid in the state were in King County, in contrast to our 29 percent share of the state's population. Some of that difference reflects high tech jobs in Seattle and the Eastside, as well as high wage manufacturing jobs in South King County. Long-range prospects are mixed. Boeing forecasts production of around 250 airplanes this year and next. Sale of those planes will bring in billions of dollars, much of which will be reinvested in the Puget Sound economy. But with the move of Boeing headquarters to Chicago, long-term prospects for aerospace are less certain, although the company has continued to emphasize its investment in the Puget Sound region. Sales tax and other government revenues are declining at a time when public investment is needed. The area is doing remarkably well so far, but if these underlying issues are not addressed, there could be lasting consequences to King County and the Puget Sound region. Due to the markedly weaker economic conditions now in the Puget Sound region than during most ofthe past decade, economic development efforts in Federal Way will have to become more creative, innovative, and broader in scope. The traditional focus on retaining and attracting businesses will not be enough. New efforts, reaching into other economic sectors and using new and innovative strategies, will be necessary. General Patterns of Existing Development Previous development trends indicate that the non-residential areas of Federal Way reflect a community that has the ability to absorb higher density (more compact) uses and greater development as growth in the Central Puget Sound region continues. And even though Federal Way is a new city in a suburban area, much of its future will be tied to redevelopment and transformation. Federal Way is characterized by: # High-quality single- and multiple-family residential areas # A range of housing that includes very modest tract homes, manufactured dwellings, and large luxury waterfront homes Revised 2002 IV-3 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development # Auto-oriented, suburban scale regional and community shopping centers and strip centers # Corporate headquarters # Two high-quality business and office parks-West Campus and East Campus # Little developed space for quality business, flex-tech, and office parks # Semi-rural areas, wildlife areas, truck stops, areas without utilities, and much vacant open space # Recreation/amusement parks # A waterfront primarily occupied by high-quality homes, but not particularly accessible to the public # Many marginal commercial areas with redevelopment potential along Pacific Highway South (SR-99) that are vestiges of a prior era Demographics Federal Way historically has been primarily a suburban, bedroom community. It has more households than jobs and as a result, provides more workers to the region than it attracts. However, since the City's incorporation, this balance between homes and jobs has shifted. Based on US Census data, the City's residential population grew by 23 percent from 67,554 in 1990 to 83,259 in 2000, while the City's covered employment has grown by 44 percent from 21,756 in 1990 (as reported by the 2001 King County Annual Growth Report) to 31,315 in 2000 (PSRC's 2000 Covered Employment Estimates). These figures indicate that during the past decade the City has begun to shed its "bedroom community" status, with more opportunities for residents to stay within Federal Way for their employment, as well as becoming more of an employment destination for residents from beyond Federal Way. The 2000 Census information shows that Federal Way's median income levels have grown substantially since 1990, with the City leading the South King County cities in the percentage of wage-earning households, as well as median household income. The 1990 Census reported median household income at $38,311. The figure grew by 29 percent over the decade leading to the 2000 census, with a median household income reported of $49,278, which is higher than the median household incomes of any ofthe other major South King County cities (Renton, Kent, Burien, Auburn, Tukwila, and SeaTac), as well as Seattle. Revised 2002 IV-4 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Moreover, it is interesting to note that the median household income of wage-earning households (which comprise 87.3 percent of all Federal Way households) was reported at $57,748. This median household income figure is also higher than that of any of the other major South King County cities, as well as higher than the South King County's average of $55,637. Similarly, Federal Way's percentage of wage-earning households (87.3 percent) is higher than any of the other major South King County cities (which range from 79.9 to 86.8 percent). As a result, and given the City's large population, Federal Way has the highest annual gross income of any of the South King County cities. However, Federal Way and the South King County cities continue to lag behind the East King County cities in terms of median household income, which range from $60,332 in Kirkland to $66,735 in Redmond. Federal Way's Regional Role Federal Way is optimally located at a mid-point in the Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan region at the intersection ofI-5 and SR-18, with easy access to the Port of Tacoma, Port of Seattle, and SeaTac International Airport. Federal Way's location is a prime asset as traffic congestion and concerns over personal and freight mobility within the region become paramount issues for commerce and industry, as well as commuters. Nevertheless, the economic boom of the past decade has largely been concentrated in the Eastside communities, Downtown Seattle and South Snohomish County. However, with changes in the high-tech industry, increasing traffic congestion, soaring housing prices, and increasing limits to growth in those areas, the "Southend bias" may become a thing of the past, leaving Federal Way in an even better position from a regional perspective. Economic Base Federal Way's retail base is diverse and attracts customers from outside the City limits. Its market share, however, is relatively low compared to other Southwest King County communities. Although Federal Way retailers capture a good deal of the City's primary and secondary market expenditures for general merchandise and food trade, a high percentage of the local populace goes elsewhere to shop for automobiles, apparel/ accessories, miscellaneous retail purchase, building material, and furniture. Overall, the capture rate for retail sales as a function of the City's primary and secondary trade area total retail expenditures is relatively low, about 51 percent (Federal Way City Center Market Analysis, prepared by ECO Northwest, July 2002). PSRC's 2000 Covered Employment Estimates reported that in 2000, covered employment (those jobs covered by the state's unemployment insurance program) within Federal Way and throughout King County could be broken down as shown in Table IV-l (page 6). As can be seen from this data, in 2000, Federal Way's strongest employment sectors were Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate, and Retail, which exceed the countywide averages considerably. The City had noticeably fewer jobs than average in the Manufacturing and Wholesale, Transportation, Communications, and Utilities sectors. Based on recent events in the employment sector, these numbers may be lower today. Revised 2002 IV-5 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development e era ayan n2 ounty Employment Category Federal Way Employees Countywide Employees (Percenta2e) (Percenta2e) Construction and Resources 1,029 (3.3%) 69,949 (6.1%) Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 13,947 (44.5%) 440,364 (38.3%) Manufacturing 3,103 (9.9%) 147,933 (12.9%) Retail 8,158 (26.1%) 189,457 (16.5%) Wholesale, Transportation, 1,606 (5.1%) 158,307 (13.8%) Communications, and Utilities Education 2,042 (6.5%) 64,454 (5.6%) Government 1,431 (4.6%) 80,542 (7%) Total 31,315 1,151,006 Table IV-I 2000 Covered Employment Estimates Fd lW dID C Market Share Industrial and business park space available to rent in Federal Way is a minuscule share of the Southend/Green River/Seattle market area. The South King County industrial area (including industrial parks, business parks, and flex-tech hybrid business/office parks) is currently the strongest real estate market in Western Washington. The industrial areas of south Seattle, Green River Valley, and FifefTacoma constitute one of the strongest markets for industrial, warehouse, wholesale, distributing, etc., businesses in the Western United States. The City of Federal Way is in a strategic position to capitalize on these markets by providing prime office space and room for new office development, as well as quality housing. Retail and Lodging Development Developed and opened in 1975, the SeaTac Mall was the primary force behind the growth of retail in Federal Way during the 1980s. After a period of some decline in recent years, SeaTac Mall is currently a prime candidate for updating, redevelopment and/or repositioning to acquire a stronger market position. In 1995, Pavilons Centre replaced the old Federal Way Shopping Center, and in 2001 the Pavilions Center Phase II came on line, with more development at that location yet to come. In 1998, SeaTac Village was given a complete face-lift incorporating the City's commercial design guidelines. In addition, in the late 1990s, a new Walmart store moved into the City Center Frame, and there have been several renovations and remodeling of existing retail structures, including the conversion of the old Safeway building at the southwest corner of South 320th and Pacific Highway into Rite Aid and the old K-Mart into Safeway. Within the last two years, a 45,000 square foot Best Buy has opened in the City Center Frame and a 52,000 square foot Albertson's remodel has occurred in the Community Business zone along Pacific Highway South. Revised 2002 IV-6 FWCP - Chapter Four, Eoonomic Development Between 1995 and 2000, four hotels/motels have been constructed in and around the City Center. These include Holiday Inn, Courtyard Marriott, Extended Stay, and Comfort Inn. In addition, a Holiday Inn Express and Sunnyside Motel (Travel Lodge) have been built south of the City Center along Pacific Highway. Hawthorne Suites, a 65 unit Country Inn, has been recently constructed along Pacific Highway South in the Community Business zone south of the City Center. Office Development Federal Way's East and West Campus Developments set a standard in the region as two of the best examples of master-planned office campuses in the Pacific Northwest. The quality of development in this area is decidedly different than elsewhere in Federal Way and Southwest King County. Within the last two years, the majority of new office development has been located within Federal Way's East Campus which has seen the following development: Foss Office Building at 108,000 square feet; Capital One Office Building at 143,000 square feet; and Federal Way Office Building and Warehouse at 70,767 square feet. The West Campus area has seen little new office development. Although permits have been issued for additional office development in the West Campus, rising vacancy rates there have stalled additional development for the near term. In the City Center no new additional office development has occurred since the last comprehensive plan update, and office buildings continue to constitute a minority of the City Center's development. Other commercial areas within the City have seen limited amounts of office development, such as the recent Lloyd Enterprises building at 34667 Pacific Highway South. Business Park (Light Industrial) Development There has been no substantive Business Park development since the City's incorporation. This lack of recent Business Park development suggests the influence of market forces outside of the City limits, where cheaper land and established industrial parks act as a draw for prospective business park development. Residential Development One of Federal Way's strengths is the range and quality of its housing stock. The quality, quantity, and range of options for housing are major factors in business siting decisions. According to the 1990 US Census data, the median value of owner-occupied homes in Federal Way was $118,800. In contrast, the average sales price of Federal Way owner- Revised 2002 IV-7 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development occupied homes in 200 I, as reported by the King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning, was $194,092, with single-family homes averaging $213,060 and condominiums averaging $112,135. These figures contrast with other King County cities, as outlined in Table IV-2. 2001 A S I P" Table IV-2 fO 0 " dH "Ki c vera2e a es rIces 0 wner- ccuple omes m n2 ounty Place All Homes Single-Family Condos Federal Way $194,092 $213,060 $112,135 Auburn $197,965 $216,549 $124,089 Renton $215,341 $248,271 $149,608 Kent $198,844 $222,580 $142,577 Des Moines $206,379 $207,302 $202,142 Seattle $318,671 $342,922 $240,619 King County $295,158 $321,700 $198,822 As one can see ftom the above data, homes in Federal Way are generally more affordable than in the immediately surrounding communities and are far more affordable than homes in Seattle and the Eastside communities. While single-family houses remain Federal Way's dominant housing type, the majority of housing starts since the late 1980s were multiple-family. Multiple-family units as a percentage of all housing units increased from less than 10 percent in 1970 to nearly 40 percent in 1990. During the late 1980s, there were twice as many multiple-family housing units constructed in Federal Way than single-family housing units. From 1990 to 1992, permitting of multiple-family construction stopped, and single-family construction slowed to about one-third of late 1980 levels. It is interesting to note than in 1990 median monthly rental rate for Federal Way was $476, while the median monthly rental rate for King County communities varied between $398 and $458. That is, Federal Way's multifamily housing stock was on the higher end of cost within the region. Since then, Seattle and some Eastside locations have become particularly expensive, and Federal Way's multifamily housing stock is substantially more affordable than those locations, while averaging competitively with nearby communities, as seen in Table IV-3 (page 9). Since 1996, the vast majority of multi-family housing development has taken place in the senior/assisted living market. During that time approximately 792 senior or assisted housing units have been added in the City, in addition to 240 skilled-care beds. This is compared with approximately 135 non-senior multifamily housing units. The lack of multi-family construction beyond this sub-market speaks to the recent market forces that appear to have discouraged investment in market rate multi-family development that commands lower rents than the King County average, as seen above. In order for the City to successfully encourage multi-family housing at a rate commensurate with the long range housing targets established under the GMA, City policy must address the market factors unique to this type of development activity. Revised 2002 IV-8 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development A Table IV-3 M If F 1 R t S 2002 vera2e U 1- amllY en s, I' rIn~ Place Two Bedroom! All Units One Bath Federal Way $710 $749 Auburn $684 $716 Renton $811 $869 Kent $712 $747 Des Moines $701 $686 North Seattle $852 $787 Queen Anne $1,104 $923 Bellevue-West $1,129 $1,200 King County $839 $869 Institutional, Educational, Cultural, and Recreational Development Federal Way enjoys a variety of affordable, high-quality health care. The City boasts three outstanding health care facilities, St. Francis Hospital, Virginia Mason Clinic, and Group Health. These facilities continue to grow and expand in the services they offer the region. In the last two years, Virginia Mason has developed a 30,000 square foot building addition, and St. Francis Hospital is currently constructing a 62,000 square foot addition. Built in 1998, the Knutzen Family provides a venue for professional theatre and the symphony. The Federal Way Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department offers a summer concert series at Steel Lake Park, which is also home to the annual Family Fest celebration. Each year, Federal Way's July 4th Red, White, and Blues festival is held at Celebration Park, where the nationally acclaimed tournament soccer and baseball facilities draw additional tourist activities. Federal Way offers a number of collegiate and vocational opportunities. Highline Community College operates a local branch campus in Federal Way. The Eton Vocation College, located in the heart of Federal Way, is a vocational college focused on job training for today's competitive market. In 2001, the DeVry Institute of Technology opened their first Northwest Campus in Federal Way. This 100,000 square foot facility provides technology training customized to increase employee workplace skills. Summary In summary, Federal Way's role in both the Central Puget Sound area and Southwest King County has been defined by its inventory of prime office space in campus-like settings, wide variety of retail and services, and large stock of quality housing. These basic sectors are enhanced by Federal Way's regional role as a center for amateur Revised 2002 IV-9 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development athletics. Much of the highway oriented commercial space that was developed in the 1970s and 80s in response to rapid population growth has been starting to undergo redevelopment, and this trend will continue. The West Campus and East Campus areas serve as models for the quality of modern commercial, office, and business park space Federal Way will need in order to attract its share of future regional growth. Urban design and infrastructure in other areas of Federal Way must be brought up to these standards. In addition, the existence oflarge parcels ofland ownership in the 344th/356th area and 31ih/324th area of the core corridor will give Federal Way a development advantage. Federal Way will continue to foster the development of institutional and cultural amenities designed to enhance the City's regional image as a desirable community offering a high quality environment for living and working. Federal Way's Competitive Position in Southwest King County Subregion While many of the development patterns are set in the Southwest King County subregion, Federal Way and five other cities have seen, or will see, significant change. These additional five cities are Auburn, Kent, Renton, SeaTac, and Tukwila. Table IV-4 (page 11) encapsulates each of these cities' current market niches, as well as their opportunities and challenges, in order to help understand how Federal Way relates to its neighbors. As can be seen in the table, much of the area surrounding Federal Way is dedicated to industrial, light manufacturing, low-scale office parks, wholesale/warehouse, distribution, etc., especially in Auburn and Kent. Much of this is not in direct competition with Federal Way. Tukwila is the major retail center for South King County and provides the region's stiffest competition for regional retailers and retail establishments, such as department and furniture stores, specialty apparel, etc. While the trade area for Tukwila's retail sector is large, Federal Way lies at the most distant point in South King County from the Tukwila/Southcenter retail center, and its trade area overlaps or competes the least with Tukwila. The City of SeaTac provides little competition in the office, industrial, and retail sectors, but has successfully captured the airport-related lodging industry, with several higher-quality establishments, including conference facilities. Renton has historically had a strong economic base tied to the Boeing Company, with both healthy manufacturing and office sectors; however, both of these sectors have seen a substantial weakening with the Boeing Company headquarters relocation, work force lay- offs, and space consolidation. Auburn and Kent have also experienced a substantial increase in vacant light-industrial building space due to Boeing Company reductions. Notwithstanding relative levels of competition from other communities in specific commercial sectors, Federal Way does experience a "competitive" relationship with several nearby municipal governments that must be taken into account. The City of Renton is a recognized leader in the county with respect to economic development, with a particular focus on downtown redevelopment and economic diversification. That city has invested public funds in land assembly projects that have attracted substantial residential, mixed-use, and auto dealership developments. Following Renton's lead are the communities of Kent and Tukwila, which have also targeted key redevelopment opportunities, acquiring/assembling land and attracting desired mixed-use development. Revised 2002 IV-10 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Similarly, Renton and Kent provide tax incentives for certain residential development and provide other financial incentives to desired redevelopment projects. In addition, Tukwila, Renton, and Kent have made substantial personnel and facilities investments in improving customer service and turn-around times associated with development permits. In addition to these five cities in Southwest King County, Tacoma is an important competitor to Federal Way. Tacoma is an older city that has made many efforts to improve its downtown and image for more than a quarter century. Tacoma city government has an aggressive economic development mission and is recognized regionally and nationally as a leader in the field. It has continually devoted its own funds, as well as state and federal grants, to stimulate economic development. Tacoma has a strategic location on the highway system and a strong port with much unrealized potential. In addition, both the city and suburbs have vacant and redevelopable land, as well as relatively cheap accessible land for residential development. Table IV-4 Summary of Economic Conditions in Southwest King County Cities Auburn Federal Way Kent Renton SeaTac Tukwila Current -Industrial areas -Regional mall -Industrial land -Business parks -Airport related -Regional retail Niche -Vacant land -West Campus -Boeing -Mid-rise office -Redevelopable land -Boeing -Regional mall -East Campus -Business parks -Mid-rise office -Redevelopable light -Weyerhaeuser Hdq -Vacant land -Mid- and high-rise industrial -Vacant land & lodging and -Mid-rise office redevelopable land conference centers -Mid-rise and high- rise lodging and conference centers Opportunities -Commuter rail -Weyerhaeuser -Boeing facilities -Boeing & -Adjacent to SeaTac -Strong retail identify -Established office, -West Campus -Commuter rail PACCAR~s mfg. & Airport & concentration business parks, & -East Campus -Established office, office complex -Major HCT -Redevelopment industrial areas -Large concentration business parks & -Mid-rise buildings Stations planned potential -Cross-valley hwy of retail industrial areas -Potential -One large strategic -Location at cross- connector planned -Land assembled for -Cross-valley hwy redevelopment parcel assembled roads 1-405/1-5 redevelopment connector planned areas -Future hwy - cross- -Boeing office/mfg -Central location -Strengthening -Strengthening roads (1-5 & complexes between downtown downtown SR509) from -Proximity to SeaTac Tacoma & Seattle -New Pennit Center -Strong economic Seattle will open Airport & to Port of -1-5/SR 18 and investment in development focus acres for office and Seattle crossroads development -City partnership business parks -Commuter rail -HCT stations revIew resources with private sector unanticipated -City partnership in redevelopment -Pern1Ît process rec- with private sector ognized for speed in redevelopment ofturnaround -City partnership with private sector in redevelopment Challenges -Distance from 1-5 & -Dispersed -Industrial image -Limited retail -Adjacent to SeaTac -Limited vacant land major economic development -No prospect for attractions Airport for business & concentrations pattern HCT -Limited land for -Massive office parks -Low-scale -Not on commuter -Off-center location business & office redevelopment -Freeway access not development rail on SR 167 parks required easy or obvious -OfT-center location -Weak downtown -Small land holdings -Not anticipated to -Land assembly -Limited vacant land -Wetlands inCBD be on HCT line required -No obvious center or -Reduction in Boeing -Wetlands -Off-center cross- -Not on commuter focal point within presence; vacant -Reduction in Boeing roads (1-405 & SR rail Tukwila buildings presence; vacant 167) -Limited quality -Limited quality buildings -Reduction in Boeing -residential supply -residential supply presence; vacant -No obvious center buildings or focal point Revised 2002 IV-11 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development In summary, any program of economic development for Federal Way must monitor conditions and trends in Tacoma and Southwest King County, and act decisively and aggressively to increase the City's strategic position. Summary of Achievements Although the City of Federal Way's economic development efforts are relatively new, several important accomplishments in formulating the City's economic development strategy have already been accomplished. # The City of Federal Way/Federal Way Chamber Economic Development Committee meets monthly to discuss and develop economic development strategies and maintain a close and cooperative working relationship. # The City has developed Celebration Park which, in addition to the recreational amenities for City residents, includes tournament-quality soccer and softball facilities that attract players and tournaments from throughout the Pacific Northwest, thereby contributing substantial economic activity to Federal Way through expenditures for lodging, shopping, dining, and other services. # In 2001 the City officially incorporated an Economic Development Division within the Community Development Services Department and hired a Director. # With increasing lodging tax revenues, the City of Federal Way Lodging Tax Advisory Committee has expanded its work plan to include more direct efforts to stimulate tourism and visitorship to the City. # The City has co-founded and co-manages the South King County Technology Alliance, a working committee of various municipal entities and businesses within South King County dedicated to fostering further development of the technology sector within South King County. # The City has embarked on a concerted effort, led by senior management, to improve permit processes and reduce regulatory hurdles to development. In 200 I, the City worked collaboratively with the Federal Way Chamber and other stakeholders to raise the thresholds that trigger right-of-way improvements associated with redevelopment, remodeling, and reuse of existing buildings. In 2002, the City has embarked upon a permit-process improvement effort that includes a public stakeholder advisory committee and study of best practices from around the region, and is intended to place Federal Way at the forefront of regional municipalities in regulating land use and construction effectively and efficiently. Revised 2002 IV-12 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development 4.2 THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT VISION FOR FEDERAL WAY The vision for economic development in Federal Way can be encapsulated into four basic areas: I) to retain existing businesses and attract new businesses in order to build a diverse economic base; 2) to increase the number of jobs within the City relative to the population of City residents within the labor force; 3) to foster redevelopment of the City Center from a low-scale, suburbanized commercial area to a full-service, high-density, mixed-use, and more pedestrian-fuendly urban core and community focal point; and 4) to build upon and expand the City's recreational and cultural assets to increase visitors to the City and encourage greater visitor spending within the local economy. The strategy encourages or accelerates the trends and transformations that are already occurring in this community. The major objectives of the strategy include the following: # Provide a better balance between housing and jobs by increasing the number of jobs within the City relative to the number of households. # Diversify the economic base by encouraging higher paying white collar and technical jobs while preserving and enhancing the strong retail base. # Generate more demand for hotel room-nights through growth in office and business part space. # Foster horizontal mixed-use employment sector growth in the South 34Sth Street area in the near term (2000-2005). # Foster continued Corporate and Office Park employment sector growth in East and West Campus in the mid-term (2000-2010). It should be noted that East Campus has recently been experiencing a high rate of growth and may reach build out during this time period. # Emphasize private redevelopment and land assembly through the I-5/SR-99 corridor, especially in the City Center, as well as the 34Sth and 336th areas. # Redevelop and improve the quality of the mixed use development along Pacific Highway South from South 272nd Street to South 356th Street (2000-2010). # Foster mid-rise, mixed-use employment sector growth in the City Center (2000- 2020). # Encourage quality development throughout the City to attract desirable economic development in Federal Way. # Maintain and improve the quality and character of the existing residential neighborhoods. Revised 2002 IV-13 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development # Promote high quality, higher density residential neighborhoods in the City Center and Highway 99 corridor in close proximity to jobs and good public transportation. # Continue to work with the lodging providers to promote year-round vistorship to the City to encourage visitor spending as an important component of a growing local economy. # Work with other agencies to provide services for education and training, as well as social services and other remedial programs for the underemployed and the unemployed. Future Regional Role for Federal Way # Encourage greater diversity in the economic base by aggressive pursuit of a broader range ofthe components of the regional economic activity, as well as greater participation in international/Pacific Rim economic activity. # Increase its share of local resident-serving retail and services, and increase its share of regional, national, and international oriented business firms. # Increase its capture of region-serving office development. # Emphasize private redevelopment and land assembly through the I-5/SR-99 corridor, especially in the City Center, as well as the 348th and 336th areas. # Strengthen the City Center as the City's focal point for commercial and community activities. Transform the City Center into a regional commercial destination, as well as a major transit hub. # Generate more demand for hotel room-nights through growth in business park and office space, as well as recreational and cultural amenities that draw visitors from throughout the Pacific Northwest and beyond. # Take advantage of its location with respect to the Ports of Tacoma and Seattle, as well as the SeaTac International Airport. # Public and private sectors in the Federal Way area act cooperatively and . aggressively to attract firms from throughout the region, the nation, and other countries. # Actively pursue relationships with areas in other parts of the Pacific Rim region for trade, commerce, and cultural advantage. # Actively pursue cooperation and collaboration with other nearby municipalities, organizations, and firms to market Federal Way and South King County for technology-related enterprises. Revised 2002 IV-14 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Retail Areas # SeaTac Mall and other regional retailers within the City redevelop/reposition to meet changing consumer demand and become more competitive with other regional retailers. # High-volume retail in Federal Way increases faster than population. # Growth in resident-serving retail occurs in the City Center, existing commercial nodes, new nodes around the 1-5/South 320th and 1-5/SR 18 interchanges, and in redevelopment areas along SR-99. # Neighborhood scale retail development keeps pace with population growth and to an increasing extent, is accommodated within mixed-use buildings in more concentrated neighborhood villages. # Pedestrian-oriented retail development emerges gradually in the redeveloped City Center. # Small amounts of retail use occur on the ground floor of offices, residential buildings, and parking structures. # Neighborhood scale retail development in concentrated neighborhood villages emerges in response to growth in multiple-family concentrations in the I-5/SR-99 corridor and new single-family development on the east side ofI-5. # Old, outdated strip centers along the SR-99 corridor redevelop as a mix of retail, office, and dense residential uses. # The large truck-stop facility at the intersection of Enchanted Parkway and South 348th Street is redeveloped into a retail or mixed-use commercial center. Office Development # Offices of regional, national, and/or international firms locate in West Campus, East Campus, and the City Center. # Garden, high-rise, and mid-rise office space, and modem light-industrial buildings increase rapidly in areas with land assembled for business parks and in redeveloped retail areas. # Office development is integrated with retail, residential, and business parks. # Federal Way attracts more corporate regional headquarters and regional offices. Revised 2002 IV-15 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development # Smaller, older, outdated office structures are replaced with newer uses. # Integrated, campus-like high amenity areas are encouraged for corporate headquarters and modem research/development of high technology uses east ofl-5. # Development of technical and research space increases in East and West Campus. # Federal Way attracts more high-tech firms and firms whose business is related to high-tech industries. Business Park (Light Industrial) Development # Business parks contain a mix of uses in and among buildings as dictated by the market for high quality spaçe. # The City should explore potential changes to the Business Park zoning designation to meet changing market conditions and make the development of Business Park-zoned land more economically viable. Residential Areas # High quality residential areas are important for attracting and retaining businesses. # A range of housing types, densities, and prices allow the broad spectrum of employees to live near their work and recreation. # The City of Federal Way encourages integration of high density housing with retail and other uses, especially along SR-99 and in the City Center. Institutional, Educational, Cultural, and Recreational Development # The City of Federal Way will continue to work closely with existing institutional entities (such as St. Francis Hospital, Federal Way School District, King County Library, etc.) as important components of a full-service local economy. # Federal Way's reputation as an important center for amateur sports competition and participation grows stronger, leading to potentially new facilities and venues, as well as increased visitorship and visitor spending in the local economy. # Federal Way's cultural assets increase in both scope and number, gaining greater patronage and attracting visitors from beyond the City limits. New cultural establishments are developed in Federal Way, such as museums, exhibitions, and Revised 2002 IV-16 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development performance venues. Likewise, new cultural events become established in Federal Way, such as music festivals, art shows/festivals, etc. # # Stimulate quality development of region-serving institutional and technical facilities. Existing recreational amusement facilities continue to develop as regional tourist attractions. # The City of Federal Way creates working partnerships with institutions of higher education in order to encourage and support their expansion and further integration within the Federal Way economy, as well as to identify and exploit increasing opportunities for economic development. 4.3 FORECAST OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN FEDERAL WAY The growth forecasts used in this chapter are derived from the 2000 Market Analysis and 2002 City Center Market Analysis, prepared by ECONorthwest, while other chapters are based on the PSRC regional forecasting model. In summary, probably the strongest sector in the near-term (five years) will be the retail/ services sector. About 1.5 mì1lion additional square feet of retail tenant space may be expected during the next 20 years, with commercial areas throughout the City and the City Center alike sharing in the development. One particular sector that appears under- represented is the quality restaurant sector, in which the City will likely see additional development. Demand for new office development will likely be somewhat low in the near term, as office vacancies have risen substantially and rents have correspondingly fallen, region- wide. In addition, several office buildings, particularly in the West Campus area, exhibit substantial vacancies that can readily absorb near-term demand in the City. Nevertheless, the long-term picture looks good, with continued demand for and interest in office space in Federal Way, particularly in the East and West Campus areas. City Center office development will likely lag behind for most of the planning horizon. However, generous zoning, panoramic views, and proximity to the freeways and transit may start to make the City Center a more attractive location for mid- to high-rise office development in the 10 to 20-year time frame. With regard to housing, only a small amount ofland remains in the single-family zoning districts to accommodate new single-family dwellings. As a consequence, the vast majority of new residential development will have to take the form of townhouses, walk- up apartments, mid-rise apartments, and mixed-use buildings and/or high-rise residential buildings. As with the condition for single-family development, the majority ofthe multi- family-zoned land is also already developed, leaving primarily the commercial zones and City Center as the potential location of a great deal of the future residential development. Nevertheless, higher land values and construction costs, and lower relative rental rates compared with other communities in the region, act as barriers to residential development Revised 2002 IV-17 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development within the City Center in the near term, unless public-sector actions create financial incentives, reduce development costs, or otherwise create conditions attractive to housing developers. Therefore, in the short term, most multi-family housing developments will continue to be seen in the remaining multifamily-zoned areas and in the neighborhood commercial areas or other commercial areas along Pacific Highway South. While multi- family housing is generally not permitted in the Business Park zones, this zone will continue to accommodate senior housing developments, as has been seen in recent years. In the longer term, assuming no public-sector incentives, as rental rates rise and demand increases, housing developers will likely respond to the opportunities for development within the City Center, and begin to add multi-family housing there, as well. Substantial new lodging development in Federal Way is not anticipated in the near term, unless actions are taken to increase demand substantially. With business travel somewhat cut back due to increasingly burdensome airline-travel procedures since September 11, 200 I, the demand for hotel rooms has dropped. Business-related travel may be slow to return to earlier levels. Sports-related lodging demand during the late Spring, Summer, and early Fall has been solid over the past few years and is expected to increase, although development of new lodging facilities will likely not follow increased demand during only a few months of the year. If sports- or event-related facilities are developed within the City that could accommodate off-season events, it is likely that more near-term demand for lodging would rise and could occasion development of new facilities within the five-year timeframe. Like all forecasts, these should be periodically monitored relative to the real estate market and economic conditions in South King County, the Central Puget Sound region, and Federal Way. In addition, the economic development policies and underlying assumptions related to local and regional decisions concerning infrastructure, transportation systems, and land use regulation should be carefully monitored. 4.4 IMPLEMENTATION Attributes of Successful Economic Development Programs Successful economic development programs typically have the following attributes. First, they receive material support and leadership from the mayor, City Council, and senior City staff. Second, the municipal leadership is willing to work creatively and cooperatively with private sector leaders and businesses to accomplish economic development goals. They have the ability and find the resources to target infrastructure projects and programs to encourage development or redevelopment of specific areas. To do this, they work aggressively to secure state and federal funds for local public and private assistance. Likewise, City staff is empathetic toward economic development goals and knowledgeable about working within City legal constraints, budget constraints, and community tolerances to assist businesses and the real estate development process. The staff also has the ability to react and make decisions quickly and consistently to provide Revised 2002 IV-18 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development assistance for private sector dealings with the public planning and regulatory processes. The staff s ability to link several programs, team up with other departments, and leverage limited funds allows them to take meaningful and effective action. In addition, the City should be creative and open to exploring and adopting innovative regulatory and incentive programs to attract and retain businesses and development projects, such as SEP A planned actions and developer agreements. Key among such programs should be any feasible efforts aimed at predictable and streamlined permitting processes. The City's Role in the Economic Life of a Community In the State of Washington, the direct actions that cities can take to encourage economic development have historically been more limited than in other states. Nevertheless, in the past few years several new and important tools have been made available to local communities to help encourage redevelopment, retain/attract jobs, and foster "smart growth." These tools include: # Community redevelopment financing (similar to tax increment financing) # Limited tax abatement for multifamily development # Community empowerment zone designation # Community renewal act (updated and expanded version of former urban renewal) # Tax deferrals and exemptions for high technology businesses and investment, as well as manufacturing investment # Industrial revenue bonds Notwithstanding these state programs, there are still substantial constraints on the scope of actions a city government can do with respect to economic development activities. However, one of the most significant direct actions a city can take is to provide the necessary infrastructure. This includes: 1) developing long term facilities expansion plans; 2) designing the specific systems and projects; 3) raising or borrowing local funds to finance the projects or act as a conduit for state, federal, and intergovernmental funds; and, 4) forming public-private partnerships to jointly construct projects. Second, a city can deliver high quality and cost effective urban services. These necessary services include police and fire protection; parks, recreation, and cultural services; social services and job training; and a well-run land use planning and regulatory process. In addition, a city can actively participate in public/private groups designed to help businesses and the development community as they work their way through the state and federal regulatory processes. Third, a city can directly impact economic development by doing market research or by being a landowner and developer. For example, a city could develop, maintain, and disseminate data and analysis on local development conditions and trends, as well as Revised 2002 IV-19 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development monitor important trends and assumptions upon which plans, programs, and strategies are based. In addition, a city can buy land, aggregate parcels, and make necessary improvement so that it is ready for new development or redevelopment. For some projects, a city can issue industrial revenue bonds or other tax-free municipal bonds. This also allows a city to joint venture with a private sector partners for appropriate development. In terms of indirect roles, a city can act as a facilitator to convene public and private entities to work on issues of local importance and reach consensus. Preparation of a comprehensive plan is an example of this important indirect action. A city can act as a representative oflocal resident's and business's interests in resolving regional and countywide problems such as traffic congestion, housing, and human service issues. A city can also mobilize local community support for important projects and problem solving; and work to improve the overall image of the community and in doing so, make the community more attractive for economic development. Lastly, a city's public investment in municipal facilities, such as city administrative offices, judicial/court facilities, community centers, and cultural and recreational venues can be a factor in inducing further economic development. By targeting a subarea for an infusion of redevelopment investment and daytime population, nearby businesses not only may see a greater captive market, but may also be encouraged to remodel, renovate, and/or improve their establishments. Cultural and recreational facilities can have a wide range of economic impact, from simply attracting residents to a particular part of the city (e.g., city center) more frequently where they may patronize other businesses, to attracting visitors from around the region and country who will bring new revenue to the local economy through lodging, restaurant, and goods/services expenditures. General Approaches to an Economic Development Strategy There are basically four local economic development strategies that impact the level of private business growth in a community. # First, studies of employment growth experience in local communities in the United States show that the large majority of new jobs are generated by expansion and retention of businesses that are already located in the community. A city's role in this strategy is to help businesses resolve problems so that they can expand locally rather than move to another community. Problem resolution includes helping a business find a larger more suitable site, work through a land use or zoning regulation problem, or access necessary infrastructure. This strategy typically has low to moderate cost implications and a high probability of success. # Second, the relocation of firms from other parts of the country or new plant locations are rare and do not account for a significant share oflocal employment growth relative to overall employment growth in the United States. However, when new firms do relocate to the community, the boost in the local economy can be great and the "press" can attract the attention of other firms. Local governments can attract new business to their community through aggressive marketing strategies (websites, brochures, etc.), close collaboration with regional Revised 2002 IV-20 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development economic development councils and chambers of commerce, and through financial incentives. This strategy has high risk for the number of successes and has a high cost. # Third, new businesses that are the result of new business start-ups, spin-offs from existing local firms, and new business ideas and technologies are another effective way that communities increase employment and businesses within a local area. Local government encourages new business formation usually through indirect methods. These strategies can have moderate-to-high costs depending on the specific actions and low-to-moderate degree of success. # Fourth, tourism and visitorship can be very important components of a local economy. A city with recreational or cultural assets that draw visitors can build upon these assets to increase the numbers of visitors, the length of their stays, and the amount of money they spend in the local economy. Local government can work to market the community and its assets beyond the immediate region to bring in new economic activity and can invest in recreational or cultural infrastructure to attract more events and/or visitors. Human Resource Programs In addition to the economic development strategies discussed in the previous section, human resource development programs are another general way whereby cities can support economic development. These programs are often not included as parts of an economic development program because they focus on assisting people-the human resource for businesses. However, improving and remediating human resources is an important long run approach. The previous four general approaches to economic development strategies try to raise revenues, reduce costs, or reduce risks for business location, facility investment decisions, and operating decisions of businesses. Human resource programs make a community attractive to new and existing businesses by improving the local labor force. Components of a human resources program may include: I) providing temporary support for underemployed workers, unemployed workers, and their families; 2) providing job training and retraining to improve an individual's ability to enter or remain in the work force; 3) creating referral and other programs that allow labor resources to become more mobile and to respond to information about job openings; and, 4) by providing social service programs that meet the needs of community residents who are temporarily not able to participate in the economy. In many instances a City's human resources program addresses some, if not all, ofthese human resource development objectives. Economic Development Strategy For Federal Way As with many cities, Federal Way will have limited funds with which to pursue its economic development goals. The City will have to use its resources in a focused and prioritized manner to have a positive impact on the local economic base. Table IV-5 Revised 2002 IV-21 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development (page 22) summarizes how Federal Way will implement an appropriate economic development strategy. Table IV-5 Economic Development Areas and Actions Sub Area of Who Initiates What Land Uses Are How Are They Federal Way Action Encouraged Encouraged Reasons Timing PRIMARY ECONOMIC AREAS City Center Public wi Midlhigh-rise office. Sound Transit Station. To increase capture of Emphasis 5-IO private support. High-density MF In-fill infrastructure. regional growth. (20) years. residential. Public amenities. To provide community Civic/cultural, Market amenities and assets focal point/core. recreational, Potential tax incentives. To obtain more full-range Pedestrian-oriented SEPA Planned Action~ of goodsl services in City~ retail. 344thto Public wi Mix oflow-rise office Regulations that encourage Large parcels allow this Emphasis 0-5 356th/SR99 private support. & light industry. high-quality design. subarea to respond to the (10) years. "Big box" retail. Aggressive infrastructure market for business & Investment. industrial park uses in Large land assembly. Southwest King County. West Campus Current Buildout & maintain Facilitate buildout through One of the City's prime Ongoing in landowners. quality. predictable, efficient commercial amenities as response to perrmttmg process. one of the highest quality market. Assist maintenance of master planned infrastructure and public developments in the areas. Pacific Northwest. East Campus Weyerhaeuser High-quality corporate Predictable, efficient One of City's prime In response to Corp. & office parks. permitting process. commercial amenities. market & Assist maintenance of Large landownership with corporate infrastructure and public vision, resources, & track actions. areas. record can attract major Investors. 336th linkage: Public wi High density MF. Land use & capital Provide housing & su- As appropriate four primary private support. Low rise office. improvements for gradual pport services for for market. economic dvpt Supportive retail. redevelopment/in-fill. economIc areas. areas. Public amenities. Transportation infrastructure. Old Hwy 99 Public wi High capacity & Land use & capital Provide a range ofho- As appropriate outside of main private support. business related. improvements for gradual using & support services for market. economic areas. High density MF redevelopment & in-fill. & retail for economic & residential. Aesthetic improvements residential areas. Low rise office. through sign code and urban Auto-oriented retail. design guidelines. Neighborhood commercial. High densitv MF Predictable, efficient Areas around 1- residential. permitting process. Provide a range ofho- 5/South 320th Current Low rise office. Aesthetic i1T1Provements using & support services As appropriate and I-5/SR 18 landowners. Auto-oriented retail. through sign code and urban & retail for economic & for market. interchanges. Neighborhood design guidelines. residential areas. commercial. Revised 2002 IV-22 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Economic Development Goals The City of Federal Way will not wait for market forces to create the future, but will act to shape and accelerate the evolving market trends in the direction of its vision. The City will pursue the following goals to implement economic development. Goals EDGI EDG2 EDG3 EDG4 EDG5 The City will emphasize redevelopment that transforms the City from a suburban bedroom community to a full-service community with an urban core. The City will encourage concentration of non-residential development into four pnmary areas: P High-density mixed-use development in the City Center (3lih and 3201\ SR-99 to 1-5) P Mixed-use development in the area around 348th and SR-99 and around the 1-5/South 320th and 1-5/SR 18 interchanges P High-quality office park development, including corporate headquarters, continued in and around West Campus P High-quality office development, including corporate headquarters in a park-like campus setting east of 1-5 The City will help facilitate redevelopment of existing neighborhood commercial centers in the SR-99 corridor and the 336th area between West and East Campus. The City will channel further residential growth into existing multi-family and commercial-zoned areas, with a particular goal of encouraging residential development in the City Center. The City will encourage and support the development of recreational and cultural facilities and/or events that will bring additional visitors to Federal Way, and/or increase visitor spending. EDG6 The City will encourage and support existing businesses to remain and/or expand their facilities within Federal Way. Economic Development Policies EDPI EDP2 Redevelopment of the City Center will receive special attention in the FWCP. The City will explore the feasibility and utility of a process to master plan the City Center, jointly funded by public and private entities, to encourage appropriate redevelopment. Revised 2002 IV-23 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development EDP3 EDP4 EDP5 EDP6 EDP7 EDP8 EDP9 The City will continue to seek high-quality urban design and infrastructure standards for these areas. The City will prepare a SEP A Planned Action for the City Center so that compliant development proposals may receive permit approvals with a minimum of environmental review. The City will complete designs for public infrastructure to be jointly funded by the City and private landowners. The City will work actively to formulate ways for joint public/private funding of infrastructure. The City will develop zoning, permitting, and potential financial incentives that encourage prioritized development consistent with comprehensive and subarea plans and orderly, phased growth. In order to encourage efficient and desired development and redevelopment of existing land designated and zoned for various types of commercial uses, when considering proposals for comprehensive plan amendments and rezones to commercial designations and from one commercial designation to another, the City will consider development trends in commercially zoned areas, market demand for various types of commercial land, and amount of vacant commercial land. The City will utilize innovative planning techniques such as Planned Unit Developments, and developer agreements to aid in efficient and predicable permitting for large developments. EDPIO The City will explore innovative financing techniques such as Local Improvement Districts, Industrial Revenue Bonds, and other innovative financing tools to encourage desired redevelopment. EDPll The City will work with the private sector to actively encourage the retention and expansion of existing businesses, as well as bring in new development, businesses, and jobs to the community. EDP12 The City will promote the community by working with the Federal Way Chamber and the private sector to develop marketing tools that attract new businesses, visitors, and investments. EDP13 The City will develop and manage an economic development web page that promotes business and development within the community, provides an interactive database of information of value to businesses and developers, and involves the participation of the Federal Way Chamber and other stakeholder groups. Revised 2002 IV-24 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development EDP14 The City will fund its portion of the public/private groups to allow them to do an effective job in marketing the community. EDP15 The City will continue to utilize design guidelines to enhance the urban environment to retain and attract businesses and residents. EDP16 The City will adopt streamlined permitting processes consistent with state and federal regulations to reduce the upfront costs oflocating businesses in the City. EDP17 The City will continue to pursue aggressive public safety programs designed to protect residents, businesses, and their investments. EDP18 The City will encourage strong public and private leadership to solicit community support for internal and external funding assistance. EDP19 The City will periodically monitor local and regional trends to be able to adjust plans, policies, and programs. EDP20 The City will actively work with representative groups of business and property owners, including the Federal Way Chamber and other local business associations, to enhance citywide and subarea improvements and planning. EDP21 The City, in conjunction with the local business community, will actively pursue ties to Pacific Rim nations and businesses to stimulate related business activity. EDP22 The City recognizes the importance of cultural and recreational activity to its economy and through the Arts Commission and Parks Department will pursue joint ventures with private groups and individuals in developing cultural and recreational opportunities. EDP23 The City will encourage the expansion of existing and development of new multi-purpose facilities to host cultural and recreational activities in order to increase the number of visitors to Federal Way and resultant visitor spending. EDP24 The City will continue to market the community for, and encourage development of, businesses in the high-tech sector. This effort will include exploration of regulatory and/or financial incentives to attract high-tech businesses and collaboration with regional communities, businesses, and local institutions of higher education to promote Federal Way and South King County. EDP25 The City of Federal Way will strive to create working partnerships with institutions of higher education in order to encourage and support their expansion and further integration within the Federal Way economy, as well as to identify and exploit increasing opportunities for economic development. EDP26 The City will consider opportunities to partner with local human-service organizations to assist in providing human resources development programs for unemployed or under-employed workers. Revised 2002 IV-25 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development The foregoing policies will assist the City of Federal Way to pursue an accelerated transformation toward the community's vision of its future. Table IV-6 (page 27) describes the four major employment, economic activity areas of the City that will receive the bulk of future commercial and industrial development. The table summarizes the characteristics, location, and planning process required as well as the major transformation required. The major public and private actions required for each area are listed. The Land Use and City Center chapters of the FWCP describe these four areas in more detail. Table IV-6 describes the current ownership pattern and major activities where the City will act affirmatively to transform these areas so that an increased share of regional growth will be attracted to the City. In the areas of multiple ownership, control and implementation of the community's vision will require more explicit effort and resources . from the City government. Both West and East Campus have, or will develop, their own high standards for quality of the new development. The type of development expected to occur in each of the four major economic sectors important to Federal Way's vision is related in Table IV-7 (page 28). Also related in the table are who the main competitors will be for each of these four areas. The land use policies and regulations for each area should accommodate and encourage these activities. These policies and regulations are discussed in the Land Use, City Center, and Transportation chapters of the FWCP. U Revised 2002 IV-26 Vertical Mixed City Center Master-Planned Mixed Master Planned Corporate Horizontal Mixed-Use Campus Campus Business Parks Area 31zth1320th West Campus East oft-S 344th13S6th Ownership Diverse Diverse Single Diverse Planninl!: Joint PubliclPrivate Private emphasis Private Emphasis Joint Public/Private Major Transformation Activity Increase office and residential Infill and continue trend Vacant to high quality corporate Scattered industrial retai I sectors in mixed-use buildings since 1974. headquarters & high tech. to qualitv mixed used. Maior Public Actions Comprehensive Plans C C C C Subarea Plans C Private Private C Design Standards C C C C Environmental Impact Analvsis C C C C Infrastructure Planning C C C C Infrastructure Design C Private Private C Financing Joint Private Private Joint Examples Seattle CBD West Campus Redmond Willows Road High Tech Corridor Burnaby BC High Tech Corridor Harbor Pointe Renton Bellevue Tukwila Vancouver, W A Kent Walnut Creek, CA Auburn Scottsdale, AZ Lynwood FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development C~City initiates and leads action D Table IV-6 t Zones: D I Revised 2002 IV-27 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development Market Segment Characteristics Current Competitive Vertical Mixed Master-Planned Master-Planned Horizontal Mixed- Examples City Center Mixed Camnus Cornorate Park Use Business Parks RETAIL High Cube Freeway access Moderate amenities 348th & SRI8 High Volume Cheap land/space X Locates retail or light industrial areas Festival High density population & employment Pike Place Market Regional draw Bellevue Square X Retail & restaurants Westlake Center Mall stores Edmonds LaConner Employment & Resident High auto or pedestrian traffic Southcenter X X X X Supporting Tacoma Mall Auburn Mall Rapidly growing population Southcenter X Mall-like Freeway access Tacoma Mall Hotel Serves employmen't centers SeaTac Tacoma X Only at freeway Provides meeting space Tukwila intersection OFFICE Garden $Heavy landscape $Low pedestrian levels Older Bellevue $Low/moderate inlout traffic Redmond $Small businesslprofessional & business Renton & Tukwila X X services, FIRES $Serves local & regional business along arterials $Auto oriented $Residential areas close Mid-rise $Larger tenants, sub-regional & regional Bellevue Tukwila $Moderate landscape $Moderate in & out Renton Lynnwood $Small/medium business services, medial/dental Queen Anne Factoria X X X Occasionally if part of FIRES Lake Union Tacoma Master Plan $Branch offices $Some transit Elliott Way $Surface parking or on deck Freeway interchanges High RiselHigher $ Pedestrian traffic $High amenities SeattJe $Public transit $ Larger businesses Bellevue $Moderate traffic $Professional services Tacoma $Headquarters, branch offices X X $Regional serving F.l.R.E.S. $Underground or deck parking BUSINESS PARKS $Auto/truck oriented $Warehouselretail High Tech Corridor $Cheap land $Govemment offices Eastside $Employment density Renton $Manufacturing assembly Tukwila X X $Office local/regional Kent $Professional & business service Lynn wood $Distribution & service D I Table IV-7 Zones and L dU Revised 2002 IV-28 ENUM~W ---, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SOUTHWEST KING COUNTY AND NORTH PIERCE COUNTY SUB-REGION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT N State Boundary .:".: County Boundary N State Highways N Federal Way City limits +. -SCALE- 11""" &qUols 21.000 FolII: ,~ Federal Way MAP IV-1 NOTE: Tills map Is InœnUeclltJr ~S8 a:¡ a graphical representation only. The City of Federal Way mabc no warranty IS In hi aa:uracy U.pprl""" "'rua'l'2!"D _bllho_p1loubroo.unl MEETING DATE: Ju\~ W, VXJ4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL ITEM# Y(j). SUBJECT: 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Request to Delete the Weyerhaeuser Way South Extension, North of South 320th Street fæ;;~=-~~~--~lfs~[~ ~ ---- ...........-.-..................................... .........................-............................................. .......................................--............... ..............-....--........................................-..................."'.."""'--"""""""".'..'.".........."'."""""""".........'."...... .'...""""""""""""'-"""""""".""'......."'."."""'.."""-"'""""""""""."-............ ATTACHMENTS: I) Draft Adoption Ordinance; 2) Exhibit A -Amendments to Maps III-5, III-6, and III-27B, and Table III-19 of the Comprehensive Plan; 3) Exhibit B - Apri127, 2004, Memorandum to the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) with Exhibits 1 and 2. """""""""""""""'."'.""""'-.....-........................ ..'.'.'.'. ....................................-... '."""""""""""""""""""""""'.""'.""""""""""-"'-...-......""""....................-......- ....................................................................... "'.....-....... -. ....................- ".-................""'."" ..---........-...-..-..-..................-.-..-.. --"""""'-.............. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Federal Way adopted its Comprehensive Plan in November of 1995, and amended the plan in December of 1998, September 2000, November 2001, and March 2003. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the Growth Management Act (GMA) limits plan updates to no more than once per year except under certain circumstances. In order to comply with RCW 36.70A.130, the Council shall be considering three separate actions: the Potential Annexation Area Subarea (PAA) Plan; the request by the Christian Faith Center (CFC) for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone, and approval of a development agreement and development plan; and a request by the Quadrant Corporation to delete the Weyerhaeuser Way extension north of South 320lh from the comprehensive plan and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List). These amendment requests were initiated at different times, but will be acted upon simultaneously to amend the comprehensive plan. The P AA Subarea Plan and the CFC Request are being considered on separate Agenda Bills with separate ordinances. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 24, 2004, and recommended approval of the request by Quadrant to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the comprehensive plan, and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit A), replacing it with 32nd Avenue South, and to amend Maps III-5, III-6, and III-27B (Exhibit A). ......--................-............................................-..............................................-....... """""""....."""""-""'...-'......................-""-"-'-.........................-.-.....-........-......................-............................................. ......................................... ....'..""""'-""'."""'.'.................."..'."..".""".-"."'"""-"""""""-.-'."""-............. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the Planning Commission's recommendation during a public meeting on May 3,2004. At the close of this meeting, the LUTC made a motion to recommend approval of the amendments to the text and maps ofthe comprehensive plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. ..............-................... .......-................................. ..............................................'."'.'.'. ".................""""""""""-""-............-,..""""""""""""""""""",,,.,,,..................-........-................ .........................................................................."""'."".'.."'.."""""'.'."".--""-""-""""""" PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the ordinance adopting amendments to the comprehensive plan and enactment on July 20, 2004." m~~GER APPR~~~~;--~""--"- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) .....................".........."..."..........."..-.........................................-...".-."...... COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # 3 'fèJ... 0 DENIED 1sT Reading 7&fotf ,g TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment Reading o/J MOVED TO SE~~~J> READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE # ~ {)Oì (}(l,A-' ~ RESOLUTION # Revised - 05/10/2001 Ó 1:\2003 Comprehensive Plan\City Council\070604 CC Cover Agenda.doc/06/18/2004 12:58 PM DRAFT {}/2- 9/ () Ý ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Chapter 36.70A RCW or "GMA") requires the City ofF ederal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use element (including a land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities element, and transportation element (including transportation system map[s]); and WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations implementing its comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with land use map (the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land use map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998, September 14,2000, November 1,2001, and March 27, 2003; and WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Article IX, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC); and WHEREAS, under RCW 36. 70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to continuing review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year; and WHEREAS, the Council shall be considering three separate actions to amend the comprehensive plan all of which will be acted upon simultaneously in order to comply with RCW 36. 70A.130, and WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 04-_, adoption of a Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Subarea Plan, which will replace Chapter 8, "Potential Annexation Areas," of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and address certain comprehensive plan text changes pertaining to the Community Business (BC) comprehensive plan designation and zoning; and , PAGE 1 ORO# WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 04-_, a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM 3600), and associated development agreement and development plan, for 49.97 acres located south of South 3361h Street between Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5; and WHEREAS, these actions include Ordinance No. 04-_, deleting the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320lh Street shown on Map III-27B from the Comprehensive Plan and deleting this project from Table III-19 (Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP] List); and WHEREAS, in September 2002, the City of Federal Way accepted a request from the Quadrant Corporation to remove the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the comprehensive plan, and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List); and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2004, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance on the proposed amendments to Map III-27B and Table III-I 9 ofthe comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments address all of the goals and requirements set forth in the GMA; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council committees, and full City Council has received, discussed, and considered the testimony, written comments, and material from the public, as follows: 1. The City's Planning Commission considered the requests for amendments to Map III 27-B and Table III-19 of the comprehensive plan at a public hearing held on April 21, 2004, following which it recommended approval of the request by Quadrant to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 3201h Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan), and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Capital Improvement Program [CIP] - 2009 to 2020) based on the following conditions: ORO# , PAGE 2 (i) Map I//-5 - Functional Classifìcation of Existing and Planned Streets and Highways: Upgrade 32"d Avenue South to a principal collector between the planned Weyerhaeuser Way South extension/32"d Avenue intersection and South 320lh Street. (ii) Map 111-6 - Planned Street Sections: Revise the same segment of 32"d Avenue South from a Type R street to a Type 0 Street. (iii) Map ///-27B - 2003-2020, Regional Capital/mprovement Plan: Realign Project 35 from Weyerhaeuser Way extension to 32"d Avenue South. (iv) Table 111-/9 - Regional ClP Project List: Revise description of Map ID 35, replacing "Weyerhaeuser Way S" with "32"d Ave S." 2. The Land Use and Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the proposed amendments to the maps and table of the comprehensive plan on May 3, 2004, following which it recommended adoption ofthe Planning Commission's recommendations; and 3. The full City Council considered the matter at its meetings on July 6, 2004, and July 20,2004; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the request by the Quadrant Corporation to remove the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320lh Street, by adopting the amendments to Maps III-5, III-6, and III-27B, and Table III-I 9. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings. A. The proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan, as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, to remove the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320lh Street, and upgrade 32"d A venue South to a principal collector between the planned Weyerhaeuser Way South extension/32"d A venue intersection and South 320lh Street, and revise this segment from a Type "R" to a Type "0" street would , PAGE 3 ORD# accommodate forecast travel in the study area with the same travel times and approximately the same vehicle miles traveled and is therefore consistent with the comprehensive plan. B. The proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, would not result in any additional impacts to adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods as the traffic that would have traveled on the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would shift to and be accommodated by the 32nd Avenue extension. C. Deletion of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension will allow for growth and development consistent with the Plan's overall vision and with the Plan's land use element household and job projections, and will allow reasonable use of property subject to constraints necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas. The amendments, therefore, bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; are in the best interest of the residents of the City; and are consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan. Section 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Adoption. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998,2000,2001, and 2003, copies of which are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby are and shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 3. Amendment Authority. The adoption of Plan amendments in Section 2 above is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541. Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, 200 I, and 2003 shall remain in force and effect until the amendments thereto become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance. ORD# , PAGE 4 Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affinned. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ,2004. day of CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Mayor, Dean McColgan A TIEST: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE No: 1:\2003 Comprehensive Plan\City Council\Adoption Ordinance.doc/06/29/2004 3:57 PM ORO# , PAGE 5 EXH J8 IT ~ Table 111-19 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - 2009 to 2020 2000 Cost Cumulative Totals .. . .' . ---_..._--_..~ "- -----;-n J:'2'" SI. SR (Ñ-:-\R 161: rxl~II;:I.ì-IaI1~ (1ril\(:i(1aï~,\II~'~h)r: ,i¡p-Iâl HI SR I 96-04 99 4,066,000 4,066,000 92-21 2 S 336111 St: 18111 Ave S - Weyerhaeuser Way S: Widen to 3 lanes 1,200,000 5,266,000 95-17 3 SR 99: S 340111 St -- S 356m St: Construct HOV lanes, add WB right-turn 12,096,000 17,362,000 lane, 2nd SB left-tum lane ~ 348th 95-02 4 S 312111 St: 23'" Ave S - 28'" Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 2,856,000 20,218,000 02-01 5 S 320111 St @J 1-5: Add HOV lanes on S 32O'" St 4,1 04,000 24,322,000 98-25 6 S 348'" St: 1 st Ave S - 9m Ave S: Add HOV lanes 5,174,000 29,496,000 98-08 7 S 320111 St: I st Ave S - 8m Ave S: Add HOV lanes 5,174,000 34,670,000 01-02 8 S 316'" At ~ 20111 Ave S: Signal modifications 100,000 34,770,000 98-05 9 S 324111 St: SR 99 - 23'" Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes, add 3'" WB left-tum lane 2,200,000 36,970,000 @J SR 99 93-09 10 I st Ave S: S 3661h St - SR 99: Extend 2-lane road 3,328,000 40,298,000 01-05 11 SR 99 @J S 312111 St: Add NB 2"" left-tum lanes 1,680,000 41,978,000 94-24 12 14m Ave S: S 312'" St- S 316m St: Ring Road extension 4,066,000 46,044,000 93-08 13 S 316'" St: SR 99 - II'" PI S: ring Road extension 6,160,000 52,204,000 95-03 14 S 312m St: 28m Ave S - Military Rd: Extend 5-lane arterial, interchange @ 23,894,000 76,098,000 1-5 92-20 15 SW 320111 St @. 47111 Ave SW: Signalize 180,000 76,278,000 02-04 16 SR 18 @ SR 161: Add 3'" SB thru lane, 3'" SB left-turn lane, 2nn NB right- 1,080,000 77,358,000 tum lane 92-23 17 S 304111 St: SR 99 - 28m Ave S: Widen to 3 lanes 2,376,000 79,734,000 92-14 18 Military Rd S: S Star Lk Rd - S 288th St: Widen to 5 lanes 5,280,000 85,014,000 98-01 19 S 304111 St @J SR 99: Add left-turn lanes on 304111 432,000 85,446,000 99-06 20 SR 99 @ S 336111 St: Add 2na EB and SB left lane, widen 336111 to 5 lanes to 761,000 86,207,000 20th 00-12 21 S 308111 St: 14111 Ave S 18111 Ave S: widen to 3 lanes 1,173,000 87,380,000 00-08 22 SW 336m St/Campus Dr @ 21st Ave SW: Add 2nn LT lanes EB, WB, NB, 1,680,000 89,060,000 and SB; add WB right-tum lane 98-15 23 Military Rd S: S 288111 St -- 1-5 (S): Widen to 5 lanes 14,280,000 103,340,000 00-09 24 SW 320111 St: 21st Ave SW - 26111 Ave SW: Signal modifications and 100,000 103,440,000 interconnect 97-01 25 SW Campus Dr & SW 340th St: 10m Ave SW - Hoyt Rd SW: Signal :410,000 103,650,000 coordination 00-02 26 S 312111 St @J 28111 Ave S: Add SB right-tum lane 120,000 103,770,000 98-34 27 SW 320m St ~ 21st Ave SW: Add 2"" WB left-tum lane 720,000 104,490,000 98-32 28 13111 PI S: S 330m St -- S 336m St: Extend 3 lane collector 3,024,000 107,514,000 98-17 29 S Star Lk Rd: S 272"" St -- Military Rd S: Widen to 3 lanes 1,280,000 108,794,000 98-23 30 47111 Ave SW: SR 509 - SW 320m St: Widen to 3 lanes 1,600,000 110,394,000 93-07c 31 21st Ave SW: SW 344m St- SW 356m St: Widen to 5 lanes 1,875,000 112.269,000 98-13 32 SW 344111 St & 35111 Ave SW: 21st Ave SW - SW 340111 5t: Bike lanes, 2,620,000 114,889,000 sidewalks 94-10 33 SR 509: I" Ave S - SR 99: Widen to 3 lanes 8,000,000 122,889,000 94-11 34 S 308th St: 5m PI S - 8m Ave S: Extend 2-1ane street 1,440,000 124,329,000 98-18 35 28th Ave S/S 317111 St: S 304m St- 23fQ Ave S: Widen to 3 lanes 4,200,000 128,529,000 98-57 36 SR 509: 30m Ave SW - 47m Ave SW: Widen to 3 lanes 6,400,000 134,929,000 98-58 37 SR 509 47m Ave SW - West City Limits: Widen to 3 lanes 6,400,000 141,329,000 00-10 38 SW 330m St ~ I st Ave S: Signal modifications, extend NB left-tum lane 250,000 141,579,000 98-24 39 Hoyt Rd SW: SW 320m St- SW 340m St: Widen to 3 lanes 7,200,000 148,779,000 92-22 40 1st Ave 5 S 348th St- S 356'" St: Widen to 5 lanes 1,584,000 150,363,000 98-39 41 1st Ave S: SW 301'tSt-SW312m St: Widen to31anes 3,600,000 153,963,000 98-21 42 S 333'd St: 8111 Ave S - 13th PI S: Extend 3 lane street 4,752,000 158,715,000 94-17 43 SR 509: IS! Ave S - 21st Ave SW: Widen to 3 lanes 7,200,000 165,915,000 94-22 44 5336111 51 9 ' Ave S - 13m Ave 5: Widen to 5 lanes 1,152,000 167,067,000 95-07 45 5288 ' 51 5R 99 - Military Rd S: Widen to 5 lanes 1,540,000 168,607,000 98-19 46 S 308th 51 8th Ave S - 14m Ave 5: Install curb, gutter, sidewalks 1584,000 170.191,000 98-26 47 5 320'h 51 (à) 5111 Ave S: Signalization 200,000 170.391.000 98-29 48 5W 320' St (ZìJ llh Ave 5W: Signalization 180,000 170.571.000 C.\PITUl'Ro,Œcr LIST EXH J8 IT ,--A ~ . -- Project Map 2000 Cumulative Number ID Project Description Cost Totals 98-28 49 SW 320th St (âJ 7th Ave SW: Signalization 180,000 170,751,000 98-30 50 10m Ave SW (âJ SW 334th St: Signalization 180,000 170,931,000 98-07 51 SW 336th Wy & SW 340m St: 26m Ave SW - Hoyt Rd SW: Widen to 5 4,840,000 175,771,000 lanes 98-20 52 S312thSt: l"AveS-14thAveS:Wident05Ianes 5,082,000 180,853,000 00-15 53 SW Campus Dr (âJ 19m Ave SW: Modify signal, increase curb rerum radius 200,000 181,053,000 93-12 54 SR 509 @. 47m Ave SW: Add turn lanes, realign SR 509 1,100,000 182,153,000 98-31 55 SW 356m St (âJ 13m Wy SW/14m Ave SW: Signalization 180,000 182,333,000 98-27 56 I" Wy S (jiJ S 333'" St: Signalization 180,000 182,513,000 00-07 57 S 348m St (jiJ 9m Ave S: Add ZO" SB left-turn lane 360,000 182,873,000 01-03 58 SR 509 (â) 26th PI SW: Add WB left-turn lane 420,000 183,293,000 00-16 59 SR 99 (â) Spring Valley Montessori School: Add NB left-turn lane 750,000 184,043,000 92-11 60 SW Campus Dr: I" Ave S - 10m Ave SW: Widen lanes/sidewalk 1,540,000 185,583,000 93-07a 61 21" Ave SW: SW 312m St- SW 320m St: Widen to 5 lanes 2,200,000 187,783,000 98-14 62 S 288m St: Military Rd S - 1-5: Widen to 5 lanes 1,400,000 189,183,000 SUBTOTAL . 189,183,000 r .~~.~'O~~'\K!iORI~~Î)~:APli\l. PROJÎic~'l..I:S:I'.,,='::'~~~"="=' '='== ='~'~'. .~~.:.~ ()X-~f 63 111'.\ Iraill'lubl'I\"S\\'35(,"'SI Cityl.imits ')(,0,000: %1J,Oí)() 98-39 64 9 Ave S: S 333 St - S 348 St: Widen for bike lanes 3,072,000 4,032,000 98-42 65 SPark & Ride Trail: SR 99 352 - S 348 9: Extend trail 720,000 4,752,000 SUBTOTAL 4,752,000 ~ TOTAL CITY EXPENDITURES l" 193,935,000 i .. .. .. .. '--'---- - '1"'...i{7¡(i:~ ~'~~',,!':ç¡.... 2X:'I'" St: ,\\1\1 IIOV lan~, .- '-. ,,- ---"-'- --;--9,6.,1,OÒÕT"- I),(,;j,lJ()/)'. :' 9,1-09 01-07 2 S 272"" St (âJ 1-5: Add 2"" EB left-tum lane, WB right-turn lane 6,702,000 16,334,000 00-21 3 1-5: S 320th St - SR 18: Add HOV lanes 40,000,000 56,334,000 00-19 4 1-5: SR 18 - SR 99: Add HOV lanes 60,000,000 116,334,000 02-05 5 51" Ave S (â) S 3 16th St: Signalize 180,000 116,514,000 02-06 6 S 321" St (âJ 44m Ave S/46m PI S: Signalize 180,000 116,694,000 98-47 7 SR 18 WB ramps (âJ Weyerhaeuser Wy S: Signalize 400,000 117,094,000 94-20 8 Park & Ride and Transit Center: SR 99 vicinity S 272"" St 10,440,080 127,534,080 94-19 9 Park & Ride and Transit Center: SR 161 vicinity S 356th St 10,440,080 137,974.160 02-07 10 S 272"" St (à) 42"" Ave S: Signalize 180,000 138,154.160 02-08 11 51" Ave S (à) S 296th St: Signalize 180,000 138.334,160 95-31b 12 Military Rd S: S 272"" St - S star Lk Rd: Widen to 5 lanes 5,544,000 143,878,160 94-18 13 City Center Transit Center 44,000,000 187,878,160 98-44 14 S 320th St 1-5 - Peasley Canyon Rd: Add HOV lanes 4,032,000 191,910,160 98-49 15 SR 99 (âJ S 279m St: reconfigure intersection, signalize 1,260,000 193.170,160 98-50 16 S 288th St (jì) 51" Ave S: Add WB left-tum lane 360,000 193,530,160 95-18 17 SR 18: W Valley Hwv- Weyerhaeuser Wy S: WB truck climb lane 10,000,000 203.530,160 94-03 18 1-5 (âJ SR 161: Construct interchange & reconfigure SR 18 interchange 150,000,000 353.530,160 00-24 19 SR 18: SR 161- SR 167: Add HOV lanes 50,000,000 403.530,160 98-43a 20 Military Rd (âJ S 27200 St: Add SB and EB right-tum lanes 432,000 403.962.160 01-06 21 S 360 ' St (jì) 28th Ave S: Add left-tum lanes, signalize 1,440,000 405.402.160 98-46 22 S 272"" St: SR 99 - Military Rd S: Add HOV lanes 5,040,000 410.442,160 94-04 23 S 336th Transit Center (S 336m (â) SR 99) 6,464,426 416.906.586 00-22 24 SR 161' Milton Rd S-MilitaryRd S: Widen to 5 lanes 25,872,000 442.77X,586 95-05 25 S 3l2th St: Military Rd - 51" Ave S: Extend 5 lane arterial with bike lanes, 13,920,000 456.698.586 sidewalks 95-24 26 S 272"" St 'ú' S Star Lk Rd: construct left-tum lane 720,000 457.418,586 95-31a 27 Military Rd S: S 260m St - S 27200 St: Widen to 5 lanes 8,078,000 465.496.586 95-26 28 S 320th St ,Ú, Military Rd S: Add EB, WB right-turn lanes 432,000 465.928,586 95-28 29 S 316th St Extension to W Valley Hwy: Widen to 5 lanes 18,000,000 483.928.586 98-55 30 S 360" St SR 161 - 32"" Ave S: Widen to 3 lanes 4,080,000 488.008.586 Rt'GIO:-.i \1 (11> PROJHT liST " ""I: Table IlI-19, Capitallmprovcment Program (CIP) - 2009 to 2020 Page 2 EXH J8 'T_- ------A-- Project Map 2000 Cumulative Number ID Project Description Cost Totals 98-20 31 Military Rd S: S 320th St- SR 18: Widen to 3 lanes 6,000,000 494,008,586 95-21 32 Military Rd S: 31 ~ Ave S - S 320'" St: Widen to 3 lanes 6,720,000 500,728,586 98-60 33 Military Rd S: SR 18 - S 360'" St: Widen to 3 lanes 11,520,000 512,248,586 98-61 34 Military Rd S: S 360th St-SR 161: Widen to31anes 11,520,000 523,768,586 98-62 35 Weyerl1aeHser 'Ny S 32"0 Ave South: Military Rd S S 320'" St: Extend 3 10,560,000 534,328,586 lane collector 98-51 36 16'" Ave S: S 272"0 St- SR 99: Widen to 3 lanes 2,400,000 536,728,586 98-48 37 S 272"" St: Military Rd S - Lake Fenwick Rd S: Widen to 5 lanes 4,200,000 540,928,586 98-53 38 28'" Ave S/S 349m St: Weyerhaeuser Wy S - S 360'" St: Widen to 3 lanes 5,940,000 546,868,586 98-52 39 51" Ave S/S 321" St: S 288'" St- S Peasley Canyon Rd: Widen to 3 lanes 15,360,000 562,228,586 96-04 40 S 321" St@) Peasley Canyon Rd: Add left-turn lane 216,000 562,444,586 98-45 41 Peasley Canyon Rd: S 321" St - W Valley Hwy: Widen to 5 lanes 9,504,000 571,948,586 98-43b 42 S 272M St @) Military Rd S: Add 2M EB, NB left-turn lane 750,000 572,698,586 98-50 43 S 288th St: 1-5 - 51" Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 4,368,000 577,066,586 95-54 44 S 328th St/38th Ave S/S 334th St/33rd PI S: Military Rd S - Weyerhaeuser 6,144,000 583,210,586 Wy S: Widen to 3 lanes SUBTOTAL REGIONAL CIP LIST 583,210,586 'I RJo.;<.;IO:\,\L :'IiO:\-MOTORll.EI> 1>IUORln' 1>IWJECr UST ! -õö=25' BPÃ Tr;¡¡:-r,:.iiiitarY'Rd-5Ist AveS--"----" -'-- - --"----"--"""-"--""'---'" 45 2,400,000 2,400,000 00-26 46 BPA Trail: 1-5 - Military Rd 2,800,000 5,200,000 95-31 47 Military Rd S: S 272"0 St - 1-5 352,000 5,552,000 95-32 48 Military Rd S: 31" Ave S - SR 161 4,864,000 10,416,000 95-33 49 S 320th St: 1-5 - W Valley Hwy 1,536,000 11,952,000 SUBTOTAl. REGIONAL NON-MOTORIZED CIF LIST 11,952,000 ~ TOTAL REGIONAL EXPENDITURES' , 595,162,586 ~ GRAND TOTAL I.. 789,097,586 i Table III-19, Capital Improvement Prugram (CIP) - 2009 to 2020 Page 3 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMO RAND UM April 27, 2004 TO: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe) VIA: David Mos ager FROM: Kathy McCI , Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update - Quadrant Site-specific Request, File #02-104263-00 UP MEETING DATE: May 3, 2004 I. BACKGROUND The 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments include four components.. The first is the adoption of a Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan, which will replace Chapter 8, Potential Annexation Areas of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). The second is the adoption of language related to a new zoning classification entitled Freeway Commercial, which would apply to both the City and the P AA. The third request is to remove the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street from the comprehensive plan. The last component is the request by Christian Faith Center for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM 3600), and associated development agreement and development plan. This staff report pertains exclusively to the request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, s~own on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the FWCP (Exhibit A of Exhibit 1), and to delete this project from Table III-I 9 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B of Exhibit 1). Attached are the following: 1. 2. Exhibit I Exhibit 2 April 14, 2004, Staff Report to Planning Commission with Exhibits A-D April 21, 2004, Planning Commission Minutes II. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY March 20, 2004 Issuance of Determination of Nonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) EXHIBIT 'B April 5, 2004 End of SEP A Comment Period April 19, 2004 End of SEP A Appeal Period April 21, 2004 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission May 3, 2004 Presentation to LUTC May 17,204 LUTC Follow-up July 6, 2004 City Council Meeting III. SITE-SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE In September 2003, the City received four site-specific requests for changes to comprehensive plan designations and zoning, and one request to delete a future road from the comprehensive plan. The Federal Way City Council held a public hearing "Selection Process" on November 18,2003, on these requests and determined that only the request by Quadrant to delete a future road from the comprehensive plan should go forward for further analysis (Exhibit C of Exhibit 1). The City required the applicant to prepare a traffic study analyzing the effects of deletion of this street from the comprehensive plan. A March 2, 2004, traffic study "S. 320th Street North Parcel: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Analysis" was prepared by The Transpo Group (Exhibit D of Exhibit 1). QUADRANT REQUEST Location: 02-104263-00 UP 551560-0005,551560-0010,551560-0015,551560-0020,551560-0026, 551560-0025,551560-0030,551560-0037,551560-0035,551560-0091, and 551560-00901 Weyerhaeuser Way South would be extended from its existing terminus at South 320th Street in a northwesterly direction to the future extension of32nd Avenue South (Exhibit C of Exhibit 1). The Quadrant parcel is approximately 20 acres Wally Costello on behalf of the Quadrant Corporation Weyerhaeuser Company Wally Costello on behalf of the Quadrant Corporation Request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320'h Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan (CIP]) from the Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit A of Exhibit 1) and to delete this project from Table III-I 9 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B of Exhibit 1). File Number: Parcel No.'s: Size: Applicant: Owner: Agent: Request: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Federal Way Office Park and King County Urban Residential I These parcels are the underlying parcels owned by the Quadrant Corporation through which the road extension is planned. Since the alignment of the road is conceptual at this time, there are other unidentified parcels that may also be affected. LandlUse Transportation Committee April 27, 2004 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update - Quadrant Site-specific Request Page 2 EXHU3IT z Existing Zoning: Federal Way Office Park (0 P) and King County R -4 (Residential, four units per acre) and R-18 (Residential, 18 units per acre). Req uested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: Staff Recommendation: N/A N/A Staff recommended that the request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map 1lI- 27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the comprehensive plan (Exhibit A of Exhibit 1) and to delete this project from Table IIl-19 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B of Exhibit 1) be approved. IV. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION During the hearing, the Planning Commission asked who would be responsible for extending 32nd Avenue South, and at what time would the extension occur, Traffic Engineer Rick Perez responded that as property on either side of32nd Avenue South developed, the developer would be responsible for building the half-street adjacent to his or her property. On Map IlI-6 of the Comprehensive Plan, the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension is classified as a principal collector. Thirty-second Avenue South is classified as a minor collector from South 320th to South 316th Street and as a principal collector north of South 3 16th Street. Mr. Perez recommended that if the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension from South 320th Street to South 316th Street was not constructed, then that portion of 32nd Avenue South, which is planned to be a minor collector, should be upgraded to a principal collector. This would ensure a consistent traffic flow on 32nd Avenue South from South 320th northwards. The Planning Commission concurred with Mr. Perez's recommendation and added the following amendments: 1. Map IlI-5: Upgrade 32nd Avenue South to a principal collector between the planned Weyerhaeuser Way South extension/32nd Avenue intersection and South 320th Street. 2. Map IlI-6: Revise the same segment of 32nd Avenue South from a Type R street to Type 0.2 3. Map 1lI-27B: Realign Project 35 from Weyerhaeuser Way extension to 32nd Avenue South 4. Table Ill-I 9, Regional CIP Project List: Revise description of Map ID 35, replacing "Weyerhaeuser Way SIt with "32nd Ave SOl V. LAND USErrRANSPORTATlON COMMITTEE OPTIONS The Committee has the following options: LRecommend that the full Council accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt an ordinance approving the request by Quadrant to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map IIl-27B (2003-2020 1. 2 A Type R street consists of two lanes and on-street parking on either side, whereas a Type 0 street consists of two lanes and bike lanes on either side. Land/Use Transportation Committee April 27, 2004 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update - Quadrant Site-specific Request Page 3 EXHIBIT ~ :!\ Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit A of Exhibit 1) and to delete this project from Table III-I 9 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B of Exhibit 1) replacing it with 32nd Avenue South and to amend Maps III-5, III-6, and III- 27B as set forth in Section IV of this memorandum. 2. _Recommend that the full Council disapprove the request by resolution, retaining the extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South north of South 320th in the comprehensive plan. VI. COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWCC Article IX, "Process VI Review," any amendments to the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan designations map, or zoning text must be approved by the City Council based on a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Per FWCC Section 22-541, after consideration of the Planning Commission report, and at its discretion holding its own public hearing, the City Council shall by majority vote of its total membership take the following action: 1. 2. 3. 4. Approve the amendments by ordinance; Modify and approve the amendments by ordinance; Disapprove the amendments by resolution; or Refer the amendments back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. If this occurs, the City Council shall specify the time within which the Planning Commission shall report to the City Council on the amendments. ~~~. ~-,~ / , L ~ ~ Eric Faison, Member Michael Pa r LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 April 14, 2004 Staff Report to Planning Commission with Exhibits A-D April 21, 2004 Planning Commission Minutes K:\Comprehensive Plan\2003\2003 Amendments\LUTC\050304 Staff Report to the LUTc.doc Land/Use Transportation Committee 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update - Quadrant Site-specific Request April 27, 2004 Page 4 EXHŒ3ll EXHIBIT I PAGE , OF---"-- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM April 12,2004 To: John Caulfield, Chair, City of Federal Way Planning Commission FROM: Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: 2003 .Comprehensive Plan Amendments MEETING DATE: April 21, 2004 I. BACKGROUND Federal Way adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 and updated it in December 1998, December 2000, November 2001, and March 2003. The Growth Management Act (GMA) limits plan updates to no more than once per year except under the following circumstances: (i) The initial adoption of a sub-area plan that does not modify the comprehensive plan policies and designations applicable to the subarea; (ii) The adoption or amendment of a shoreline master program. (iii) The amendment of the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan that occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a county or city budget. Except as otherwise provided above, the governing body shall consider all proposals concurrently so the cumulative effect of the various proposals can be ascertained. However, after appropriate public participation, a county or city may adopt amendments or revisions to its comprehensive plan that conform to this chapter whenever an emergency exists or to resolve an appeal of a comprehensive plan filed with a growth management hearings board or with the court. II. 2003 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS The 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments include three components. The first is a request to remove the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street. The second is the adoption of a Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan, which will replace Chapter 8, Potential Annexation Areas of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). The third component is the adoption of language related to the adoption of a new zoning classification entitled Freeway Commercial, which would apply to both the City and P AA. Changes to the text of the comprehensi ve plan are not proposed during this year's update because the seven-year update was completed in March 2003. The intent of the seven-year update was to ensure that the comprehensive plan complies with the key requirements made to the GMA between 1995 and 200 I. EXHIBIT- I PAGE----L-OF~ This staff report pertains exclusively to the request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the FWCP (Exhibit A), and to delete this project from Table III-I 9 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B). The Planning Commission commenced the public hearing on the P AA Subarea Plan and the Freeway Commercial Zone on March 17,2004, with a continuation to April 7, 2004. They will hold the portion of the public hearing on whether to amend the comprehensive plan to remove the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South on April 21, 2004. Ill. REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, "Zoning," Article IX, "Process VI Review," establishes a process and criteria for comprehensive plan amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission is as follows: . To review and evaluate the requests for comprehensive plan amendments; . To detennine whether the proposed comprehensive plan amendments meets the criteria provided by FWCC Sections 22-529 and 22-530; and, . To forward a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan amendments. IV. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY March 20, 2004 Issuance of Oetennination of Nonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) April 5,2004 End of SEP A Comment Period April 19,2004 End of SEP A Appeal Period April 21, 2004 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission v. SITE-SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE In September 2003, the City received four site-specific requests for changes to comprehensive plan designations and zoning, and one request to delete a future road from the comprehensive plan. The Federal Way City Council held a public hearing "Selection Process" on November 18,2003, on these requests and determined that only the request by Quadrant to delete a future road from the comprehensive plan should go forward for further analysis (Exhibit C). The City required the applicant to prepare a traffic study analyzing the effects of deletion of this street from the comprehensive plan. A March 2, 2004, traffic study "S. 320tlo Street North Parcel: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Analysis" was prepared by The Transpo Group (Exhibit D). Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12, 2004 Pagc 2 EXHIB'T- _.J PAGE-3-0F-!-L- Quadrant Request File Number: Parcel No.'s: 02-104263-00 UP 551560-0005,551560-0010,551560-0015,551560-0020,551560-0026, 551560-0025,551560-0030,551560-0037,551560-0035,551560-0091, and 551560-0090. Weyerhaeuser Way South would be extended from its existing tern1Ïnus at South 320th Street in a northwesterly direction to the future extension of32nd Avenue South (Exhibit C). The Quadrant parcel is approximately 20 acres Wally Costello on behalf of the Quadrant Corporation Weyerhaeuser Company Wally Costello on behalf of the Quadrant Corporation Request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit A) and to delete this project from Table III-I 9 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B). Location: Size: Applicant: Owner: Agent: Request: Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Federal Way Office Park and King County Urban Residential Federal Way Office Park (OP) and King County R-4 (Residential, four units per acre) and R-18 (Residential, 18 units per acre). Requested Comprehensive Plan: Requested Zoning: Public Comments Received: N/A N/A None ANALYSIS Background They applicant submitted an application for a binding site plan (Federal Way File #03-102229-00- SU) and SEPA review (Federal Way File #03-102230-00-SE) for development of an office complex (East Campus North Office) on the parcels shown on Exhibit C in May 2003. The reason for their comprehensive plan amendment request is that the extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South from its existing terminus at South 320lh Street to the future extension of 32nd A venue would divide this parceL The application for a binding site plan for these parcels has been determined to be incomplete by the City and is therefore on-~old at this time. Neighborhood Characteristics The underlying parcels through which the future road extension is planned are a mix of vacant and single family residentiaL In addition, the Bonneville Power Administration (BP A) power lines with supporting towers are located in this area. 1 These parcels are the underlying parcels owned by the Quadrant Corporation through which the road extension is planned. Since the alignment of the road is conceptual at this time, there are other unidentified parcels that may also be affected. Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12,2004 Page 3 EXHIB'T~ PAGE~OF-O- There are no structures on the Quadrant parcels and it is difficult to determine whether existing structures on adjacent properties may be affected by a future road extension, since the alignment of the road is conceptual at this time. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Sensitive Areas The underlying Quadrant parcels across which the road is shown in the comprehensive plan have a rolling topography. Slopes vary from zero to eight percent over the majority of the site, with the steepest slope of 15 percent located in the easterly portion of the site. The site is generally mapped as Alderwood soils. There are four on-site wetlands. One wetland is located near the center of the site and the other three are located in the easterly portion of the site. No environmental information is known about the other parcels across which this road would extend. Drainage The underlying Quadrant parcels are vacant. Deletion of the road from the comprehensive plan will not affect drainage. If additional impervious surface is added to any of the parcels in the future through either the road extension or development or redevelopment of the parcels, they will be required to meet the 1998 King County Suiface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the 1998 KCSWDM. Access The area through which the future road is planned for is bounded by South 320th Street on the south and 32M Avenue South on the west. Weyerhaeuser Way South is planned to be extended northward from South 320lh Street and curve gradually westward to intersect the future extension of 32nd A venue South between the BP A powerline corridor and South 316th Street. . Noise Based on a site visit to these parcels, staff observed that these parcels experience noise from both 1-5 and South 320th Street. The extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South would result in additional noise impacts to the existing residences along the alignment. Potential Traffic Impacts If approved, the proposal would delete a planned street from the comprehensive plan. The traffic study (Exhibit D) concluded that no roadway improvements would be needed by 2020 as a result of the proposed action. Although there is no substantial impact associated with the deletion of this road from the comprehensive plan, vehicular delay could be reduced by a minor traffic signal phasing and pavement marking modification at the intersection of South 300111 Street and 32nd Avenue South. Projections for Population and Employment There are some single-family residences in the area of the planned road extension; however, it is difficult to tell if they would be eliminated, since the road alignment is conceptual at this time. Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12,2004 Page 4 EXHIBIT- I PAGE_-~~F~ CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES Goal or Policy Comments TP 10, which reads in part, "Protect The deletion of the proposed Weyerhaeuser Way South existing and acquire future right-of- extension to the proposed extension of32nd Avenue South is not way consistent with functional consistent with this policy. However, a traffic study (Exhibit D) classification cross-section (transit, prepared to evaluate the impacts of not constructing this street rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs." on 2020 traffic volumes found that without the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension, the planned 32nd Avenue South extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area. TP14, wruch reads, "Provide access The traffic study (Exhibit D) prepared to evaluate the impacts of between major development areas not constructing the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension found identified in the recommended that the planned 32nd Avenue South extension would altemative, while improving business accommodate forecast travel in the study area with the same access and protecting City travel times and approximately the same vehicle miles traveled. neighborhoods." Therefore, access between major development areas would still be provided. TP20, which reads, "Take advantage The future 32nd Avenue South extension would provide an of opportunities to open new road additional route alternative between South 320th Street and connections to create route South 316tb. Street. In addition, as stated in the traffic study alternatives, especially in areas with (Exhibit D), the planned 32nd Avenue South extension would few access choices." accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area, the same travel times, and approximately the same vehicle núles traveled. Therefore, the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension is not necessary to create an alternative route in that area. TP21, which reads in part, "Enhance The construction of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension traffic circulation and access with would provide a closer spacing of through streets; however, closer spacing of through streets, with the construction of the 32nd A venue South extension, it unless geographical constraints do would not necessarily enhance traffic circulation and access. not permit." CONCLUSION The proposed action does not create quantifiable adverse impacts. In addition, the conclusions of the March 2, 2004, "S. 320lh Street North Parcel: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Analysis," which was prepared by The Transpo Group (Exhibit D), and reviewed and concurred with by the City's Traffic Division, found that no roadway improvements would be needed by 2020 as a result of the proposed deletion of the Wcyerhaeuser Way South extension from the comprehensive plan. VI. COMPLIANCE WITH FWCC SECTIONS 22-529 AND 22-530 1. Section 22-529. Factors to be Considered in a Comprehensive Plan Amendment The City may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors when considering a proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan: Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12,2004 Page 5 EXHIBIT- I PAGE3-0F ~ (1) The effect UpOIl the physical ellvironment. Deletion of the road from the comprehensive plan is a non-project action and would have no effect on the physical environment. An evaluation of potential impacts to the environment as a result of this non-project action was conducted and a threshold Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS), pursuant to the SEP A, was issued on March 20, 2004. (2) The effect Oil open space, streams, and lakes. Deletion of the road from the comprehensive plan is a non-project action and would have no effect on open space, streams, and lakes. (3) The compatibility witlt and impact Oil adjacellt lalld uses alld surrounding neighborhoods. The underlying parcels through which the future road extension is planned are a mix of vacant and single-family residential. In addition, the Bonneville Power Administration (BP A) power lines with supporting towers are located in this area. There are no structures on the Quadrant parcels and it is difficult to determine whether existing structures on adjacent properties may be affected by a future road extension, since the alignment of the road is conceptual at this time. The Transpo Group's traffic study stated that the planned Weyerhaeuser Way extension would bisect the Quadrant parcel, significantly impacting the development feasibility of the site. (4) TIle adequacy of and impact Oil community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreatioll, alld schools. The removal of the road from the comprehensive plan is a non-project action. Therefore, the removal of the road from the comprehensive plan would not impact community facilities such as utilities, parks, recreation, and schools. The traffic study (Exhibit D) concluded that the planned 32nd Avenue South extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area either with or without the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. (5) The benefit to tile lIeighborhood, city, alld region. There would be no benefit to the neighborhood, City, or region by deleting the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. However, the associated benefit of the road deletion for the City would be the development of the 20-acre Quadrant site as office and the creation of jobs. (6) TllC quantity and location of land planncd for thc proposcd land usc typc and dcllsity alld the demand for such lalld. The removal of the road from the comprehensive plan is a non-project action; therefore, this criterion is not applicable. Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12, 2004 Page 6 EXHIBIT__I PAGE '~)F~I- (7) Tlte current alld projected populatioll dellsity in tlte area. The removal of the road from the comprehensive plan is a non-project action; therefore, this criterion is not applicable. (8) Tlte effect UpOIl otlter aspects oft/Ie compreltensive plall. There should not be any adverse impacts on the comprehensive plan as a result of the proposed road deletion from the comprehensive plan. 2. Section 22-530. Criteria for Amending the Comprehensive Plan The City may amend the comprehensive plan only ifit finds that: (1) Tlte proposed amendmellt bears a substantial relatiollsltip to public healtlt, safety, or welfare Deleting the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension from the comprehensive plan would not affect the public health, safety, or welfare. The construction of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would provide a closer spacing of through streets, however, with the construction of the 32nd Avenue South extension, it would not necessarily enhance traffic circulation and access. In addition; the traffic study (Exhibit D) concluded that the planned 32nd Avenue South extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area, either with or without the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. AND (2) Tlte proposed amelldment is ill tlte best illterest of tlte residellts of tlte city. Please see response under (l), above. However, a potential benefit of the road deletion for the City would be the development of the 20-acre Quadrant site and the creation of jobs. (3) Tlte proposed amendment is collsistent witlt tlte requiremellts of RCW 36. 70A awl witlt tlte portion oftlte city's adopted plan not affected by tlte amendment. RCW Chapter 36.70A, the Growth Management Act, requires the City of Federal Way to adopt and implement a comprehensive plan and to amend it in a timely manner, but no morc than once a year, except under certain circumstances. The City is responding to this mandate by updating the comprehensive plan. The proposed deletion of the road is consistent with the remainder of the comprehensive plan. VII. COMPLIANCE WITH FWCC SECTION 22-488(c) (1) The city may approve the application only if it finds that: a. Tlte proposed request is Ùl the best interests of the residellts of tlte city; Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12,2004 Page 7 EXHIBIT.---l P AGE --8-0 F -J- The construction of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would provide a closer spacing of through streets. However, with the construction of the 32"d Avenue South extension, the extension would not necessarily enhance traffic circulation and access. In addition, the traffic study (Exhibit D) concluded that the planned 32"d A venue South extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area, either with or without the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. Consequently, the deletion of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension from the comprehensive plan should have no effect on residents of the City. However, a potential benefit of the road deletion for the City would be the development of the 20-acre Quadrant site and the creation of jobs. AND b. The proposed request is appropriate because either: i. Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly changed since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed conditions, a change in designation is within the public interest; Since the property was annexed in January 9, 1999, a number of large office buildings and corporate headquarters have been constructed south of South 320111 Street in East Campus. Development of offices on this site is a logical extension for high quality office park development. The Transpo Group's traffic study stated that the planned Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would bisect the parcel, significantly impacting the development feasibility of the site. OR ii. The change in designation will COITect a designation that was inappropl"iate when established. This criterion is not applicable. c. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan; The following comprehensive plan policies suppo~t the futurc construction of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. TrIO Protect existing and acquire future right-of-way consistent with functional classification cross section (transit, rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs.... TP14 Provide access between major development areas identified in the recommended alternative, while improving business access and protectll1g City neighborhoods. TP20 Take advantage of opportunities to open new road connections to create route alternatives, especially in areas with few access choices. Planning Commission Mcmorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amcndments April 12, 2004 Page 8 EXHIBIT_-I P AGE ~. ) ç: -~'-'- TP21 Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of through streets, unless geographical constraints do not pennit. . .. The construction of the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would provide a closer spacing of through streets. However, with the construction of the 32od Avenue South extension, it would not necessarily enhance traffic circulation and access. In addition, The Transpo . Group Traffic Study (Exhibit D) concluded that the planned 32od Avenue South extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially the same operating conditions within the study area, either with or without the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension. d. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan; There are no regulations in FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning," that require street connectivity or specify block perimeter standards. However, Transportation Policy TP21 of the FWCP states, "Enhance traffic circulation and access with closer spacing of through streets, unless geographical constraints do not permit.. .." AND e. It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The March 2, 2004, Transpo Group Traffic Study conèluded that with the construction of the 32od Avenue South extension, the Weyerhaeuser Way South extension would not be necessary, as it would not enhance traffic circulation and access. Therefore, the deletion of the road from the comprehensive plan would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. (2) The city may approve an application for a quasi-judicial project related rezone only if it finds that: a. b. The criteria in subsection (1) above are met; AND The proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; AND The site plan of tlte proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in tlte immediate vicinity of the subject property; AND The site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon tlte public services and utilities. c. d. The request under consideration is for an amendment to the comprehensive plan to delete a road. It is not a project-related rezone, and therefore, the criteria under this section do not apply. VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDAnON Staff recommends that the request by the Quadrant Corporation for a comprehensive plan amendment to delete the planned extension of Weyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320lh Street, shown on Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) from the comprehensive plan (Exhibit A) and to delete this project from Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List) (Exhibit B) be approved. Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12, 2004 Page 9 IX. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION EXHIBIT-2-_.1 P AGE-lC-'Of- ~~ Consistent with the provisions ofFWCC Section 22-539, the Planning Commission may take the following actions regarding the proposed comprehensive plan amendment: Recommend to City Council adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment as proposed; 2. Recommend to City Council that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment not be adopted; 3. Forward the proposed comprehensive plan amendment to City Council without a recommendation; or 4. Modify the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and recommend to City Council adoption of the amendment as modified. LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Map III-27B (2003-2020 Regional Capital Improvement Plan [CIP]) of the FWCP Table III-19 (Regional CIP Project List) of the FWCP Map Showing Conceptual Alignment of Proposed Extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South March 2,2004, Technical Report, "S. 320th Street North Parcel: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Analysis" 1:\2003 Comprehensive Plan\Planning Commission\O42 104 Report to Planning Commision.docl04/1512004 I :04 PM Planning Commission Memorandum 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments April 12,2004 Page 10 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN +. 2003-2020 REGIONAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Puget Sound '\ .........-"'~ to, "\ I I .. 1 - f iZ -$ ----J /".,;+ // ~ ~....~ ~. ~ . TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Federal Way City Limits Potential Annexation Area Street Improvement Projects Non Motorized Improvement Projects . Intersection Improvement Project Transit Station Project Map Identification Number @ -em -am ß ~<~~ rnro.mæ . - ~- ~ ¡-t \~ -SCALE- " , 1 Inch equals 5,aot:ll. 0 I.. ......., . \ I ~~ FeHderal Way MAp printed February 2003 Table [[[-19 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) s 2009 to 2020 EXHIBIT-' PAGE' 11 ()F-d- Project Map 2000 Cumulative Number ID Project Description Cost Totals .i',~,~¡:,;:':)",:,,':'."~": ":,::-,:..::,..::.:::i:.f,~i;~~t~\:~:~i.f:,:;:':'::~::,.:~,:¡:~:3","'ò:.:;..t:,.:~:;i¡:'i;,¡r'", ":'" ,.",j"",:",«,..",., ""CAPITALPROJECTUSr"" """"",~,;""""""",-",:"""":,,,~, """""""'"è""" ,..:'I'~',,;.'.'~'~"'" -';':':"'~~':fe:::::"..::_:~. ':.;;;;¡- --_.~.. ---_J_/:'?;~~,,~,~'~':I~':;~~';:,_:~";':';::~~~.. ~~~--~~'6.:-=ò) ..,,'-- 96-04 I S 352 St: SR 99 - SR 161: Extend 3-lane principal collector, signal at 4,066,000 4,066,000 SR99 92-21 2 S 336"' St: 18.' Ave S - Weyerhaeuser Way S: Widen to 3 lanes 1,200,000 5,266,000 95-17 3 SR 99: S 340 ' St - S 356'" St: Construct HOV lanes, add WE right-turn 12,096,000 17,362,000 lane, 2nd SB left-turn lane (åJ 348'" 95"{)2 4 S 312"' St: 23'" Ave S - 28"' Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 2,856,000 20,218,000 02-<JI 5 S 32O"' St (åJ 1-5: Add HOV lanes on 5320"' 5t 4,104,000 24,322,000 98-25 6 S 348"' St: IS( Ave S -9"' Ave S: Add HOV lanes 5,174,000 29,496,000 98-<J8 7 S 32O"' St IS( Ave S - 8"' Ave S: Add HOV lanes 5,174,000 34,670,000 o 1-<J2 8 5 3161H At (åJ 20"' Ave S: Signal modifications 100,000 34,770,000 98"{)5 9 S 324'" St: SR 99 - 23'" Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes, add 3'" WB left-turn 2,200,000 36,970,000 lane (åJ SR 99 93-<J9 10 IS( Ave S: S 366'" St- SR 99: Extend 2-lane road 3,328,000 40,298,000 01-<J5 11 SR 99 (åJ S 3 12th St Add NB 2nd left-turn lanes 1,680,000 41,978,000 94-24 12 14"' AveS: S 312"'St-S 316"'St: Ring Road extension 4,066,000 46,044,000 93"{)8 13 S 316"' St: SR 99 -II'" PI S: ring Road extension 6,160,000 52,204,000 95"{)3 14 S 312'" St 28"' Ave S - Military Rd: Extend 5-lane arterial, interchange @ 23,894,000 76,098,000 1-5 92-20 15 SW 320'" St (åJ 47'" Ave SW: Signalize 180,000 76,278,000 02..{)4 16 SR I8@SR 161: Add 3fU SB thru lane, 3fU SB \eft-tum lane, 2nd NB right- 1,080,000 77,358,000 tum lane 92-23 17 S 304'" St: SR 99 - 28'" Ave S: Widen to 3 lanes 2,376,000 79,734,000 92-14 18 Military Rd S: S Star Lk Rd - S 288'" St: Widen to 5 lanes 5,280,000 85,014,000 98-01 19 S 304'" St (âJ SR 99: Add left-turn lanes on 304'" 432,000 85,446,000 99-<J6 20 SR 99 @ S 336'" St: Add 2nd EB and SB left lane, widen 336 ' to 5 lanes to 761,000 86,207,000 20'" 00-12 21 S 308'" St: 14"' Ave S 18'" Ave S: widen to 3 lanes 1,173,000 87,380,000 00..{)8 22 SW 336'" St/Campus Dr @ 2IS( Ave SW: Add 2nd LT lanes EB, WB, NB, 1,680,000 89,060,000 and SB; add WB right-turn lane 98-15 23 Military Rd S: S 288'" St - 1-5 (S): Widen to 5 lanes 14,280,000 103,340,000 00-09 24 SW 320'" St: 21S( Ave SW -26"' Ave SW: Signal modifications and 100,000 103,440,000 interconnect 97..{)1 25 SW Campus Dr & SW 340" St: 10' Ave SW - Hoyt Rd SW: Signal 210,000 103,650,000 coordination 00-02 26 S 312"' St (åJ 28'" Ave S: Add S8 right-turn lane 120,000 103,770,000 98-34 27 SW 320' St (âJ 21S( Avc SW: Add 2"" WB \eft-turn lane 720,000 104,490,000 98-32 28 13'" PI S: 5 330" St - S 336"' St: Extend 3 lane collector 3,024,000 107,514,000 98-17 29 S Star Lk Rd: S 272"" St - Military Rd S: Widen to 3 lanes 1,280,000 108,794,000 98-23 30 47'" Ave SW: SR 509 - SW 320.' St: Widcn to 3 lanes 1,600,000 -110,394,000 93-O7c 31 21 S( Ave SW: SW 344'" St - SW 356'" St: Widen to 5 lanes 1,875,000 112,269,000 98-13 32 SW 344' St& 35"' AveSW: 21S( Ave SW -SW 340"' St: Bike lanes, 2,620,000 114,889,000 sidcwalks 94-10 33 SR 509: IS( Ave S - SR 99: Widen to 3 lanes 8,000,000 122,889,000 94-11 34 S 308 'St: 5" PI S- 8.' Ave S: Extend 2-lane strcet 1,440,000 124,329,000 98-18 35 28'" Ave S/S 317" St: S 304" St - 23'" Ave S: Widcn to 3 lanes 4,200,000 128,529,000 98-57 36 SR 509: 30'" Ave SW - 47'" Ave SW: Widen to 3 lanes 6,400,000 134,929,000 98-58 37 SR 509: 47"' Ave SW - Wcst City Limits: Widen to 3 lancs 6,400,000 141,329,000 00-10 38 SW 330 ' 5t (åJ I S( Ave S: Signal modifications, extcnd NO left-turn lanc 250,000 141,579,000 98-24 39 J{oyt Rd SW: SW 320" St - SW 340.' St: Widen to 3 lancs 7,200,000 148,779,000 92-22 40 IS( AveS: S 348" St-S 356' St: Widcn to 5 lanes 1,584,000 150,363,000 98-39 41 IS( AveS: SW 301S( St-SW 312"St Widen t031anes 3,600,000 153,963,000 98-21 42 S 333fU St: g"' Avc S - 13 ' PI S: Extend 3 lane street 4,752,000 158,715,000 94-17 43 SR 509: IS( AvcS - 21S( Ave SW: Widen to 3 lancs 7,200,000 165,915,000 94-22 44 S 336'" St: 9"' Ave S - 13"' Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 1,152,000 167,067,000 95-07 45 S 288 ' St: SR 99 - Military Rd S: Widen to 5 lanes 1,540,000 168,607,000 EXH\B\1 PA,GE .1hLL \- 3 I EXHIBIT I P AGE -I' () F: ..---'-I~ Project Map 2000 Cumulativc Number lD Project Dcscription Cost Totals 98-19 46 S 308"' St: 8'" Ave S - 14"' Avc S: Install curb, gutter, sidcwalks 1584,000 170,191,000 98-26 47 S 320"' St ((ì) 5"' Avc S Signalization 200.000 170,391,000 98-29 48 SW 320"' St ({~ II" Ave SW: Signalization 180,000 170,571,000 98-28 49 SW 320" St ({ì2 7"' Avc SW: Signalization 180,000 170,751,000 98-30 50 10' Avc SW (ZiI, SW 334 'St: Signalization 180,000 170,931,000 98-07 51 SW 336' Wy & SW 340" St: 26" Avc SW - Hoyt Rd SW: Widen to 5 4,840,000 175,771,000 lanes 98-20 52 S 312 ' St: I ~ Avc S - 14" Avc S: Widcn to 5 lancs 5,082,000 180,853,000 00-15 53 SW Campus Dr@ 19d, Ave SW: Modify signal, increasc curb return 200,000 181,053,000 radius 93-12 54 SR 509 (0) 47"' Ave SW: Add turn lanes, realign SR 509 1,\ 00,000 182,153,000 98-31 55 SW 356"' St (ZiI, 13"' Wy SW/J4"' Avc SW: Signalization 180,000 182,333,000 98-27 56 1 ~ Wy S (àJ S 333"' St: Signalization 180,000 182,513,000 00-07 57 S 348" St (á) 9' Avc S: Add 2"" SB left-turn lane 360,000 182,873,000 01-03 58 SR 509 (ZiI, 26" PI SW: Add WB left-turn lane 420,000 183,293,000 00-16 59 SR 99 (á) Spring Valley Montessori School: Add NB left-turn lane 750,000 184,043,000 92-11 60 SW Campus Dr: I~ Ave S - 10' Ave SW: Widen lanes/sidewalk 1,540,000 185,583,000 93-O7a 61 21" Ave SW: SW 312" St - SW 320 ' St: Widcn to 5 lanes 2,200,000 187,783,000 98-14 62 S 288" St: Military Rd S - 1-5: Widen to 5 lanes 1,400,000 189,183,000 : ,./:6:..: .,... . 'y.y,i.. .., SUBTOTAL 189,183,000 '== --.~-~._~".. -.=='...~=,..=--~" -~'."..-~-..=~.. -,. . . .. NON-MOTORtZEDCAPITAL PROJECT LIST 98-40 98-39 98-42 63 64 65 BI'A Trail Phasc IV: SW 356'" St - City Limits ------. 9 ' Ave S: S 333 St - S 348 ' St: Widen for bike lancs SPark & Ride Trail: SR 99 c 352 - S 348 ' (á) 9 ': Extend trail 960,000 4,032,000 4,752,000 I TOTALOTYEXrENDITURES ~ 193,935,000 I ". REGIONAL CIP PROJECT LIST 94-09 I SR 99: S 272"" St - S 284' St: Add BOV lanes 9,632,000 9,632,000 01-07 2 S 272"" St ({ìJ 1-5: Add 2"" EB left-turn lane, WB right-turn lane 6,702,000 16,334,000 00-21 3 1-5: S 320" St - SR 18: Add IIOV lanes 40,000,000 56,334,000 00-19 4 1-5: SR 18 - SR 99: Add IIOV lancs 60,000,000 116,334.000 02-05 5 51" AveS(ZiI,5 316' St: Signalizc 180,000 116,514,000 02-06 6 S 321~ St ({ì2 44"' Ave S/46"' PI S: Signalize 180,000 116,694,000 98-47 7 SR 18 WB ramps ({ì2 Weyerhaeuser Wy S: Signalize 400,000 117,094,000 94-20 8 Park & Ride and Transit Center: SR 99 vicinity S 272",] 5t 10,440,080 127,534,080 94-19 9 Park & Ride and Transit Center: SR 161 vicinity 5356'" St 10,440,080 137,974,160 02-07 10 S 272"" St (á) 42"" Ave S: Signalize 180,000 138,154,160 02-08 II 5 I" Avc 5 @J S 296' St: Signalizc 180,000 138,334,160 95-3111 12 Military Rd S: S 272"d St - S star Lk Rd Widen to 5 lanes 5,544,000 143,878,160 94-18 13 City Ccnter Transit Center 44,000,000 187,878,160 98-44 14 S 320"' Sl: 1-5 -- Peasley Canyon Rd: Add IIOV lanes 4,032,000 191,910,160 --- SR 99 (0] S n9"' St: rcconf¡~ure intersection, si¡,-nalile .._-~=-....::- 98-49 15 1,260,000 193,170,160 - 98-50 16 5288"'St(¿ìj51"AvcS:AddWBlefl-turnlanc .. 360,000 193,530,160 95-18 17 SR 18: W Vallcy Ilwy - Wcyerhaeuscr Wy S: \VB truck climb lane 10,000,000 203,530,160 94-03 18 1-5 (á) SR 161: Construct interchange & reconlìoure SR 18 interchanoe 150,000,000 353,530,160 00-24 19 SR 18: SR 161 -SR 167: Add IIOV lancs 50,000.000 403,530,160 98-43a 20 Military Rd @J S 272,,1 St: Add SB and EB right-tum lancs 432,000 403,962,160 01-06 21 S 360" St (á) 28d, Avc S: Add Icrt-turn lancs, signalizc 1,440,000 405,402,160 EXHIB\T B--OLL PA.G,E - 2. ':~:_~. EXHIBIT_I PAGE 'J II,. '~)t::.- Project Map 2000 Cumulative Nu mber ID Project Description Cost Totals 98-46 22 S 272"" St SR 99 - Military Rd S: Add IIOV lanes 5,040,000 410,442,160 94-04 23 S 336"' Transit Ccnter (S 336"' ({~ SR 99) 6,464,426 4 16,906,~~ 00-22 24 SR 161. Milton Rd S.. Military' Rd S: Widen to 5 lanes 25,872,000 442,778,586 95-05 25 S 312"' St Military Rd - 51" Avc S: Extend 5 lanc arterial with bike 13,920,000 456,698,586 lancs, sidewalks 95-24 26 S 272"d St@ S Star Lk Rd: construct left-turn lane 720,000 457,418,586 95-31a 27 Military Rd S: S 260" St - S 272"" St: Widcn to 5 lanes 8,078,000 465,496,586 95-26 28 S 320" St ({iJ Military Rd S: Add EB, WB right-turn lancs 432,000 465,928,586 95-28 29 S 316" St Extension to W Valley Hwy: Widen to 5 lanes 18,000,000 483,928,586 98-55 30 S 360"' St SR 161 - 32M Avc S: Widen to 3 lanes 4,080,000 488,008,586 98-20 31 Military Rd S: S 320 ' St - SR 18: Widen to 3 lanes 6,000,000 494,008,586 95-21 32 Military Rd S: 31" Avc S - S 320"' St Widcn to 3 lanes 6,720,000 500,728,586 98-<i0 33 Military Rd S: SR 18 - S 360"' St Widen to 3 lanes 1\ ,520,000 512,248,586 98-61 34 Military Rd S: S 360" St- SR 161: Widen to 31ancs 11,520,000 523,768,586 9&-Q ~ W.e~ae~Sff-Wy-&-MHi~ry-R.d~;W'" ~~t~aoo-£-oIIe-c-tOf -Ij),MO;OOO 531,328,586 98-51 36 16'" Ave S: S 272"" St- SR 99: Widen to 3 lanes 2,400,000 536,728,586 98-48 37 S 272"" St: Military Rd S - Lake Fenwick Rd S: Widen to 5 lanes 4,200,000 540,928,586 98-53 38 28"' Ave S/S 349" St: Weyerhaeuser Wy S - S 360" St: Widen to 3 lanes 5,940,000 546,868,586 98-52 39 51" Ave S/S 321" St: S 288" St - S Peasley Canyon Rd: Widen to 3 lancs 15,360,000 562,228,586 96-04 40 S 321" St @ Peasley Canyon Rd: Add left-tum lane 216,000 562,444,586 98-45 41 Pcasley Canyon Rd: S 321" St - W Valley Hwy: Widen to 5 lanes 9,504,000 57\ ,948,586 98-43b 42 S 272"" St @ Military Rd S: Add 2"" EB, NB left-turn lanc 750,000 572,698,586 98-50 43 S 288" St: 1-5 - 51" Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes 4,368,000 577,066,586 95-54 44 S 328" St/38" Ave S/S 334" St/33'" PI S: Military Rd S - Wcycrhaeuscr 6,144,000 583,210,586 Wy S: Widen to 3 lanes " ...... .. SUBTOTAL REGIONAL CIP LIST 583,210,586 ---.--,.--"--'--'---- --..'--.-. ,-- ".~..,~.,~=. .'=O'.'-=..~ ..-- '- . -.,,-_u_- -- ,-, u_. -- '.'- --. .HI 00-25 00-26 95-31 95-32 95-33 45 46 47 48 49 BPA Trail: Military Rd - 51" Ave S BrA Trail: 1-5 - Military Rd Milit RdS:S272 St-I-5 MilitaryRdS:31"AveS-SR 161 S 320 ' St: 1-5 - W Valley Ih 11,952,000 SUBTOTAL REGIONAL NON-MoTORIZED CIP LIST TOT AL REGIONAL EXPENDITURES I GRAN~ TOTAL , J 789,O~ E.XH\ßtT PAGE 3 8JÚ- 3 RS1.2 S7 S7.2 . i <. ~ City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan 2003 SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DES1GNATION CHANGES Quadrant Existing .Designation: Comprehensive Plan: Office Park CF I Zoning: OP CC --- I '::'~'~',-OCê-""--" ~^"".,,':C,~.-. It) J':! IS "? ffj ¡..:, ?:; - Legend: Wetlands ~~~~ .'.""".,.", Steep Slopes Site Specific Request -0 m. -urn »X :ÞX G)J: G):I: m- m õJ I ~ - ..~ ....~ ~! ~ J' l~ "'~ ~'~.1 '\ ..~ . .' ! . "....-",..V5~:'~~"':"h,r'~ 9.2003/,,;,~ , j // Proposed Action: Elimination of \^/eyerhaeuser Way extension north of S 320th St ,,; ~ '" ~ š ~ ~ bp-~i I I . , . Pèj, u~.o". L_~.-Jr 111_I!Â ' R..J. ' ..~~t I~C) ~-=" = ". ~_., OP-=1+ -~.' ,'- ,,"-" '^^,. .. c" -, "'~ ' . r,r ( ...-N- -" ...-..'- ( ..- ~ ...- ..-- ~ .. ... .. .. 1 ~ ~ ..ce ~ ~' ....:' 4':,; ,~' """: ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~' ~ ,~f';;,' ....-.;;, ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ t4) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.....~ f. ,',' \j ~t! I , . "'-It. . F>~~rr~-: r~ 'J'~'l:1:l~':U :...: f~'~~t~~,~':\(\1""r)" '1't:~~~; }~":6{/{!:;4~:t~/t.~~:;~W:~~~;:. :.:. ~:~ ;",:;;:~~.7.:: ,:..L~"::;~.:l'~~-..:i.:..J ,,;¡;;~;:~(, '. ..1:.:::'~!:'.l.:..Jd:L;':":~~...;...,;í.:i;,;:~~.~"" '.. "',,\'~' ,!,,~.. ,>-- ",- ' Rick Pere;.' P [' ~t~~ ~~~~Ej City' of Fccic:r~I'Way r~i?~]E :?~er¡:>;{:,'.1J M i c hac I S wen son, P. E -, P. T - 0 . E , ~,~,;..¡,:_,~,~E'li',,""", ,.',,~,~, ,{iM;}i;',:,~~.",;~, ,,".',r "'~~¥""L~ ~~~ ,]~Jl~l~ ,,' i '" , Wally Costello, Quadrant Tasha Atchison, r.E., The Transpo Croup ,_:",;~;~'~,T;'Z11 ,'>JJ~Jll"\,~",! ~';':':",~:~,l:;;',;;j S 320'" Street North Parcel: Wcycrhacuser Way Extension Analysis' Thl' !HlrpO',C or tIn,; tcChIIICtll1l('ll1' )Ltl1d11111 b 10 present the results or the analyses perroll11<'d to n';¡]l1ate the il1lp:1Cl or ell1nin;uillg the planned \Veyerhaeuscr \Vay CX(cIISIU!1, rlo!11 ~ .'>2(/' :-;Il('el 10 J\\'enue. ThIs ;\l1ah'Sls h;\s IJCl'n prepared in slI11urt or thc c(!11l11'l'llel1SI\T plan ;u1Jc!1dmclH curn'll¡]y rnluested !J\' (~uadrant. The l11l,th,)d, d, ')',\ SUIT( )UI1dlll,~', tIH':,(' :\luh',;es \\TIC CI )ordliLlted In a(kal1cc wIth CIty or l:edl'1:d \V;I\' S1:\fT 111:\ ] )('(('1\11)('121111) J1ìCl1JOI:Illdull1, TllIoll)',h closc COOrdl!latIOIl :\11d ((11))CLltl'>l1 \\ltI\ (,11\ "Lltl, '] !:I11"I") 1Ildl/nl thc ;11!))()\Td 111l'th,)d'¡]ogy to arrive :11 Ihe rl'sullS [11TSClHcd hl'1ellì. Background ,\ 1>:111 o¡' Ih"lr CiJl1J]))(')¡ilhl$ phil, rill' (:IIY (>1' Ill!n:d \Vay 11:Is P1T\'OllSly (knufled :1 lo'1?, I:In,I;C Il11j)()\TnKll1 1loJnl ¡]UI \\'(Hdd c,ll'nd \Vnclh:leUSl'1 \\la)' north rrO1n II:; UllH'111 ICll1Jllll1S:11 :-; ,)211" :-;¡¡l'l'¡ tu the' ¡'1I11I](: e:,tl.'llSloll or ;\\'enlle S, This extension or \\leycrhaeusn \Vay would di\'ide thc :-; .'>2(J'h :-;tlcCt North Paled that (~uadr;\llt CorpolaljulllLls 1)I)P,):;cd f()1 de\'c!°pl1Jcnt. ¡\ Transportation l1npact :\n;l]ysis (1'1$ \\:as C()J1Jpklnll)) TLIIIS1° in ¡\b) :J(I(I) ror this pluposed d('\cl')I)l11i'11I, III I(':;P"I\';" (,) ('11\ ()lllll](Il1S 1',;',:lldlng Illl' ']'],\, <)uadI:\l1t IS pursuing :\ col11pr('hll1SI\'C phil :11111'lldl1JCnt ¡]LI\ would C111l1111:lIe tlH' subjcCI extension or \Vnnh,lclI:,n \Vay ~, This :;tu,I\' S:\IISrI<'S till' (:11\':: CIlIIII'11H'l1ts for:1 (UlllpIChcnSI\'(' phn ;llllCndl11cnt I))()«":', 1')\ {'\':dU,IIIII,I', fUtlll' \":11 x, lUIIU:; \\1111 :llld \\'lIh()ut Ih,' \\'c'ycrhaeuscI\Vay (":II'1¡',IUII, dn ¡"¡UI):: 1l'¡',:lldlll~', ¡]](' IIIlPIO\'CIIHIII 1;11\ 1\(' nJ:ldc :\S to I1S Ill'(TSslly and IWI1('flt \\11<'1\ !uhl1\ ('1\ ;1~',:lllhl thc 1111]),111:, to :¡fI('(k,I)!()HIII,':: Study Methodology 1'1 1 IUII¡..J 1 (11I)ldlll:\tl')11 \\Itll( 111";L¡fI,lllll('o;I\lcI\II\I"I',('(II"I\';\\'CI('I(11'1lllÍlnlro! :111:1 îll<',"lllt'Io,('(II')11 ,11,'I"lln('l!I,)lwlll'):'CI1I<>:,I:llk(I('(II)\lhc!1'¡('llll:¡] 1'>;1('110.1'>11 () \\"'\('111:1(,\10,( 1\\':1\ \\'11<'11 ()I\',ld('III,:', III<' (UII',IIU, 11')11 ()IIlC\\' !oads, it '0, (OIIJIII<>l1 JlI:11 tll<' ad I'll "111 u¡;¡]lcl :11 I,' 1:11" :11" n':tlll:lln\ I'll<' ::llIdy ;\rl':\ 111l<'lo;('(III)I\,; IIJcI\l<k EXHIBIT ~ PAGE-L-OF -- .. ..Thc TrJl1spo Group 11130111\'" IWCII"" N I , ~;(íl(' GOO KilfJllld, W^ ~ln031 71/0 4í':)!\í'13GG:! F;:¡x: 425,825,8434 § t:: ~ ~ I ,... ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ,... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -0(: ~. tift .. ...C'P;~'4 1L, ~ ~"" :¡;. . 28th Avenue SjS 312'h Street . 32nd Avenue SjS 312'h Street . Military Road SjS 312'" Strcct . 25tl1 Avenuc SjS 320'" Street . 1-5 SB RampsjS 320'h Strcct EXHIBIT_' P AGE --11-_~~) F ~J 1-5 NB RampsjS 320'h Street 32nd Avcnuc S/S 320'h SUcet Wcycrhacuser Wy S/S 320'" St Military Road SjS 320'" Street . . . . 'nlC City of Fcdcral Way provided thcir 2000 and 2020 forccast cmmc/2 traffic modeling networks for use in developing the future PM peak hour traffic volumes. Thc original 2020 model providcd by Ù1C City dij not include Ù1C Wcycrhacuser Way extension. Transpo revised the 2020 model to include the planned extension. Thus two model scenarios were developed, onc WiÙl the planned Weyerhaeuser Way extension and one wiÙlOut the planned Weyerhaeuser Way extension. Further modifications were made to Ùle City's travel dcmand model for bOÙl alternatives at thc Interstatc 5 (1-5) ramps to/from S 320'" Street to allow left turns from the ramps onto S 320'h Street. Thesc turning movements are currently pennitted. However, the City's 2020 model has assumcd left-turn rcstrictions. There arc no future improvements that indicate Ù1at such restrictions will be in place in the future. City staff concurred with these revisions to Ùle model coding. For bOÙl scenarios, WiÙlOut and wiùl Ù1C Weyerhaeuser Way extension, 2000 turning movement volumes were subtracted from Ùle 2020 n10del volumes to arrive at 20 year forecast growth in traffic volumes for each turning movement. Prior to adding Ù1C 20 ycar growth to Ùle cxisting turning movements, adjustments to the 20-year groWÙl wcre made to account for Ùle year in which each existing traffic count was conducted. Existing traffic counts at the study intersections were conducted in eiÙler 2002 or 2004. By adding the difference in Ùle two models to existing traffic counts, Ù1C forecast results arc calibrated to real-world conditions. FurÙlermore, tlús mcùlOdology furùlcr accounts for slúfts in traffic Ù1at rcsult from planned improvements, such as the S 312'" Street extension. TIús is a common post process modeling procedure that reduces tlle effects of known modcling deficiencies and limitations. The above proccdurcs were followcd for both scenarios (wiùl and without Ù1C Wcyerhacuscr Way extension). Traffic volumes along S 320'h Street were balanced betwccn intersections. Thc resulting traffic volumes without the Weyerhacuscr Way cxtcnsion are shown in Figure 1 for the wcckday PM peak hour, whilc Figurc 2 shows dIe traffic volumcs with tlle Wcycrhaeuser \V'ay extension. " '1 r EXHIBIT -.D.ili PAGE~9f -'3- The Transpo Group - DRAFT- 1f3\ S 312TH ST f4\ S 32OTH ST \:!..J MtLfTAA.YROS ~ 25TH AVES I 260 I 524 6 I ~t~ ¡ ~t5t~ !. m) 4... 43 I i 291) 94 ) 4... 152 ! 389- -449 293- -447! 1866- -1821 1,493- I 57 t ( 104 181 t ( 77 î 217 t I '32 t ( 3; 838 t ! ~tr; I ~;'5 1 ~t ~t" L_------~~-----_J....._-----_____~l_- ----- ~61_. ._-------~--_.l_- 20 600 I 5~ - -'+\.- 4... 157 -1,404 1.112 - - 1,063 -(274 9O1t ~ r- 615 371 fl\ S 312TH ST \V 28TH AVE S f2\ S 31ZTH ST \.!:..J 32NO AVE S CD ~5~~ f6\S32OTHST \V 1-5 NB RAMPS EXHIB'T_. 1 PAGE-'-' . tl 't-~OT TO SCALE SEATAC MALL (f) uJ ~ 0 a:: ~ S 312TH ST (f) ~ I l- e:> C"J (f) W > <X: I I- <0 C"J (f) W ~ 0 Z C"J C? S 320TH ST S 324TH ST 0 S 320TH ST 0 S 32OTH ST 0 S 320TH ST 32ND AVE S WEYERHAEUSER W'( S MILIT AA.Y RD S 48 28 256 58{177 121 {86 150 { 215 -' '.- -' '.- -' '-- 245) 4... 112 26) 4...17 103) 4...329 1,142- -950 1,094 - -145 1.164 - -762 96t (6 211 t (272 215t (234 -.tr- -.tr- -.tr- 212 12 201 302 123 78 60 5 126 ~ Figure 1 . 2020 Traffic Volumes Without Weyerhaeuser Extension 4 S 320th Street North Parcel: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension M="I2'lI22821GraptUcslgraphidl2 <A> BrandooM 02f26/04 07:59 EXHIBIT~ PAGE3-0F ..lS... lte. .. " T raf!SP 0 GQp . . . . , . tt . . . . . . . . . (t t8 .. . ~ ft ~ fe (I . .. lD tD . It 'I . . S . . .. . I ~ t t f1\ S 312TH ST 10 S 312TH ST 'I" f3\ S 312m ST \V 28TH AVE S 32NO AVES; \:!..J MIlTTAAYROS 265! ! .91 269 127 i ï 24~ I -'t'-! !---i 2<:xJ) ~48! i 300) I 394- -458! 278- -412! I 58 t (100 ¡ 216 t ( 121 ! 201 t ~t~ ~ ~ ~t I 52 72 , 194 223 . 292 I_~~- --- ---- L -------------- - L - ---- 3~ QS320THST ~ 25TH AVE S f5\ S 32OTH ST \V 1-5 sa RAMPS f6\ S 32OTH ST ~ 1-5 NB!WAPS 6 99 I 399 .-14'- 94 J ~ 152 1873 - - 1 836 1485- I "32 t ( 3; '852 t I -..t~ I 49 65 ------.1 8 20 627 I 520 -'t'- -1,392 1,104- ( 274 901 t ~ ~ 608 3&4 ~ 159 -1,0581 I I I S 312TH ST EXHIB'T_- PA E- 2 :'.. I " .. N - NÒî' TO SCÞU ~-'- SEATAC MALL if) uJ ~ 0 0::: ~ -.. ¡;r (/) w > « :r: l- e '" C/) W > « :r: I- co '" S 320TH ST ~ S 324TH ST 0 S 320TH ST 0 S 32OTH ST 0 S 320TH ST 32ND AVE S WEYERHAEUSER WY S MILIT MY RD S .8 115 260 59120 66 1 175 150 J 202 -' '-- ...J '- -' '- 240) \.. 20 17 ) ~31 103) ~307 1,132- -935 1,057- -759 1,167- -m 96t (16 138t (259 215t (236 ~tr- ~t~ ~t~ 223 60 126 253 127 n ~ 95 123 EXH I B IT -1L.& PAGELOF33 I~ Figure 2 rs 2020 Traffic Volumes With Weyerhaeuser Extension . I S 320th .Street North Parc,e/: Weyerhaeuser Way Extension M:vm>2282\GrnphicslgrnphidJ2 <8> ß¡¡móooM 02l26~ 08:00 100 Tra~o GrŒ4J ,. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ . . ., ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . 0 . ~ ~ ~ (J ~ -"ë L..... " I .. . . ; -~- /.:. ( 18> If' Evaluation Criteria and Results Through coordination with City staff, Ùuee measures of effectiveness were identified for analysis to determine the effect of the Weyerhaeuser Way extension upon traffic operations in thc'-area. The selected measures of effectiveness ir¡.clude: study intersection level of service (LOS), corridor travel time on Weyc,rhaeuser Way and 32nd A yenuc S, and ychiclc nules traveled (VM-I) as determined hy the City's traffic modeL Intersection Operations The City of Federal Way provided Ù1eÏI 5ynchro network for use with the S 320th Street North Parcel TIA. TIlls Synchro network was revised to include future city projects in the immediate area that were also considered in the development of the future 2020 traffic forecasts. 111ese improvements include: . The extension of 32nd A venue S, from S 320th Street to S 312th Street . The extension of S 312th Street from 28th Avenue S to Military Road S (across Interstate 5) . Improvements to S 320th Street including a seven lane section. City staff providcd specific dctails of projected future channelization at the study intersections that are affected by ÙIese improvements, as well as various - .... llnprovelnents to eXlsung IntersectJons. Level of service (LOS) analyses was conducted for the 2020 wiÙ1Out extension and wiù1 extension scenarios using ù1ese improvement assumptions. Traffic signal cycle lengù1s were preserved as provided by ÙIe Synchro file (120 seconds), but Ù1e signal splits and offsets were optinllzed in Ù1e 2020 wiù1Out extension scenario and held constant for Ù1e 2020 wiù1 extension scenario. By holding ù1e timings constant, an equal comparison can be drawn between Ù1e results to isolate Ù1e effect of the extension on traffic operations. Table 1 summarizes the LOS results with and wiù1Out the \X1eyerhaeuser \'V'ay extension. SYllchro LOS sheets are provided in ¡\ttachment A. EXHIBIT .D..b PAGE-LOF ~ . \ qA' The Transpo Group - DRAFT- page 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ -.,--,.,.." øé\" ~,'t ~ ~ ~ .. ;--:J1- "w C'" \; ~ 0 ,I i ") -¡ ¡'- >0 1--"" ,\'~O, "....1'\.\ I¡..~/i' rJÞ\C~~F ,~, , o~ i= at. )--~ '1 (l b 'e 1 r -',- 0 rt~ f~=-=- =...,~O < Wl" '<o';:~';V\':io'f-'o'oo'o'oo'o'oo' f-'o'"o'o"o-o.'.'.'o~o 'o'.'¿"'o;o~o'o'o U"'o'oí'o,£'o'o-t,oo'oo,oo 00.0,'0'00'0:0"""0' ~~~,W/) ¡~~61l:j lrBRf.~ ;{i::~:9Jr~ , , '1111': " j i ,! 0 ',li,' c-t ? (, ; () :," 1;-; I tii; Ide C. 2 -10 9 OIB C 3302 089 C 3002 09S C 20.3 0/" c: 180<1 O.lJG C n ~ OC,C) C 2/9 O.lJS C 23,8 N IJ Left 24,2 0.74 33,6 0089 31.1 0,96 20.1 0.74 2802 0061 23.1 061 2/S 0.68 to'"lll,lIi f((¡del, ',li cet c c , I 25'00 f\vc II lJ(o c):j 32000StrC'et I "51\ f(¡¡llip/', 320" Stred c c I 'j tW r,allip/" 320' Stl('el J 2" fo,venll" '" ,200 Sl,eet c c \',',..,.", Iidell 1::(/S3)() Sl 1,1111tdl',. 1:(¡"do",,20' Street c: F~~ 7, :p ;';'~'; !:~';T~'~ ~~~', : ~'~'.' ?,~',:?T;\r~~:~:?~~ ~::~:;i;rf:'~:~~~ ~'::~?~~r~~~:;~j~~.1 , 0 , I ',jl' I¡":ill, ,il,j litic-¡:,o,il"ll ,,,OJ';''I(O(i((!i''II'('J:lle;¡IL()\ il,ll" 1 1\,0 II¡'J]"'lllil,'::llI,iI" Ill¡c'h,o,I¡"I) :I,llulh'l¡lCrC:hCll1 il I:: I ( , Ie ",.II,!! ( , ( ,! I I "" ,11 \\ ,0 ¡h:"Oll"'î \\0:11 C',lc"lhl¡ 'I) ::Clîun", !Î](" I:lJl'l'~1 decrease , ' III :II'lî:I,!'.'-" dei:!, :1', ,I 1(',lIll ,010 Ihe \\Onol''ll:Ie\l~lî \V:II' C\ICll::I')ll 1\0:1' (,)Ul1d 10 be at \ )Ir¡'¡' \tln't!,\1¡Jll:ln F,(':ld, I\¡IC¡ dnlT:l::nl III :I)j1III\111l:1Ieh 1 ,l'l(,l1d 1'C!,'clJl(:lco I),ocrcO:I'CO'; III 1'"llIllW I" Ciqulillo Lll1<) (V/(:1 l)\"(llJ :11 j"lll ()(tI](' ('J,",hl ~lgI1:¡]I!ocd ,:llll" 1111('!,nil"ll ,1'01(01"1111 \\0,01 lÎ 1l:1l'lI"î \\:11 ¡o::',llîbl'>1j ¡lllolllll')::ectJ()ll,()( ,\loCJ111C/\ ).'(1' :'I)nl ,llld \\ llC!h:ll'll::C! \\;ll/\)}() \11('('1 :liT IJ1lP:lctcd by the 1111),;l lllhl'î l-¡lll'l :tll"ii\.llll'o dill' I() Ill(' (0:¡';::I,I',llI1Hî1\ ,01 11.11(1< :llld I¡C IIllP:1Ct ;JI1d 11'.'î:111 ,L!.!\ 1111111 :l';-;I,",lll11(îll 1<1 \,01 lil:, ¡',nll"lb IIIHIe) lîlh(,1 ::CL'11:I1I" '1'111' IC",IIII, "j 1111 :11\.11 ',I Ill,II' ,llco 111.11 11](' \\0('1 lî 11:11 II'" 1\\ :11 (':'olllhl()l] pl()\ÏdL'~ IIlllllnll"'!I,olll 1'1"\tOlolllliIIIÎ',nlllli\<I!"î:III"ll:,:ll1111',dlldl 111IIÎ",0,II"11::0 II1c(':¡,;c~ :lllddnl,ol," ill,k!.11 i)(IIIC(11II1,'III<I:'(lîl.lll<l',:II('\111111Ill:111",,'$)ldl'hlotl1:l1 1\1'110111'0 oli,I:1 'ii,!'!.I'! Iii I ,111,1..'."!II:I!>I]'I,IIII!I"'1 1 III lI\(î 11)1»)(', 1)(':11, 11<>lIIII,IIII' "lll,lill"II"".'>lII,I"'llllllIWI')"IHî:lle,llol('('I'l:ih\(Olnl'¡"\\'ltholil tl1e\Vl"\(îl\.lI'!I"'Î \\:lle:';icll:,I"ll Corridor I ravel limp Analysis {I',IJli',illio ,111)( $'I,',j",'iil"<lI1IIIlII' :lo'ltï)(lllnlllltll('llllllo,lo'II<lII!,()\llo"ldh,t):II'(,I (1111(' (hl<lII!',11 ,Iw :ill,"( In I 11<11111 ,;()IIIIl I()llie Ilîll1 :IIHI \IIIII()II' ,Ill' \\'('I,(,)I1:I('ll:;l'1 \\I;I\, (' >; I ( î I " I < 'I I \ '. ,I', I : tl, t Ii: II n I 1»<1111 11<>11I¡1)IIIIIIlI,llld 'I<llllltl">lliid 11:11°cl IIIJW:: IIOC(' C:;(IIIl:llnll"I:1I')(licl"'I',IIIIIIII,i'/('lldllli',')()(11nol',<lIIIII',j \Vq(ÎIl:ICtI,n \Vay, ;llld , EXHIBIT ~ PAGE~OF ~ II!>, I I,l!>"')() (""\lI' tilUd I ~ .. . .. .. .. .. ... . .. .. ~ ~ -8 '8 '8 ~ ~ ~ ... 1 ~ ~ ~ .. . . ~ ~ (t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . , 0 , ~ EXHIBIT_- , PAGE-1I.,,)F~ ending/beginning 500 feet south of S 312th Street. In the scenario \via:out the Weyerhaeuser Way extension, vel-ùcles would travel on Weyerhaeuser Way, S 320'h Street, and 32"d Avenue S, With the Weyerhaeuser Way extension, vehicles would bypass S 320'h Street and travel on Weyerhaeuser Way directly to 32nd Avenue S. A traffic signal was assumed to be constructed at the 32nd Avenue S/Weyerhaeuser Way extension intersection, and is included in the with exténsion scenario travel time calculations. . Running time for the scenarios is expected to be approximately the same for each alternative since the posted speed and distance traveled is essentially the same for each scenario. These running times were then added to turning movement delay experienced at each intersection along the travel route. The delay estimates utilized were consistent with the Synchrv model outputs utilized for the intersection LOS calculations. A third, miti~ted scenario was added for evaluation in the travel time analyses to demonstrate a potential mitigation measure that would noticeably reduce travel time in the without Weyerhaeuser Way extension scenario. Based on information provided by the City, the south leg of the 32nd Avenue S/S 320th Street intersections is configured with a left-turn lane and a left-thru lane. Tl-ùs configuration and traffic volumes would require operating the traffic signal with split phasing. Split phasing is generally considered less than desirable phasing meÙlOd as it results in less efficient signal operations. Therefore, Ù1e third scenario assumes Ù1e SOUÙl leg would operate with a left-turn and a thru-right and Ùle signal would be operated with more efficient phasing. The benefits of eliminating such phasing from the future plans for this traffic signal are shown in Table 2, along with the unmitigated scenarios. A detailed summary of the travel time data is shown in Attachment ß. Table 2 ;F,~""i:":- '~:.:,~"',>f;:;.,:"ç"-;;:-"'::["':':'¡o:>:.è::',:i.';':"",';,;",,: )I~ith' Wëyerhaêi.tsefWay' EXtérisiori' <-,,>,--;;,'..,;":,c-..z::-;- ~,-,-"";'-""-:-:,,,,,--. c. ',_f-",'.'-;:;.'-," - III- '. 1lIimmI1IBn.. - _1IiIiiImII ". ~~~-()1$_-..ì~~_,:.,_..~-~...~~_'-t1[Jt-o'!i;,;;¡;;-'--:_~_. ~~-;'I._~--'~" --. ~~_::--- :,.,- ~';'1_'6'~ ~~ fA~,;.ægg~ ~à..~~ ~~~,~~ re'~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ EXH I B IT---I:L...I :, PAGE..::LOF ~ page 7 E ~ ... -. -if ... ... 4 .. .. ~ 4 .. -t ~ .~ ~ ~ 4 --:;-,11' 1 ~ .. ~ .. ~ ~ '$ . .. .. 1 ~ .. ~ ~ . ~ .;,~... ... .' t\ :>.J . ~~. EXHIBIT' PAGE~.)~~ As is shown in Table 2, Ù1e travel time comparison between the with and unmitigated wiù10ut Weyerhaeuser Way extension scenarios shows that the Weyerhaeuser Way extension provides travel time savings for vel-ùcles traveling both north and south along ùle selected route, Northbound, it accounts for a savings of only 10 seconds per vel-ùcle, while in the southbound direction it accounts for approximately 30 seconds of travel time savings per vel-ùcle during the PM peak hour. However, if the City's proposed split phasing at 32nd Avenue S/S 32œh Street is replaced wiù1 protected north/south phasing, the difference between the with and wiù10ut Weyerhaeuser Way extension scenarios is cut in half. In the northbound direction, a vel-ùcle would save approximately 6 seconds of travel time with the extension, and about 14 seconds in the southbound direction with the extension, when compared to the without extension alternative. As was noted previously, in the mitigated without extension scenario, the northbound leg of the 32nd Avenue S/S 320th Street intersection would be converted to provide a single left turn lane to allow for protected north/south left turn phasing at the intersection. In order to further understand the effects of these changes among the mitigated and unmitigated scenarios, the previous LOS analyses were revised to address the proposed mitigation measures. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 3. Also shown in Table 3 are the results of the queuing analyses. The queuing analysis was conducted using Synchro 5.0 and focused primarily on the northbound left-turn movement only, Table 3 1iJ'i§~<'õ7:~~~8"'A ~o--"ci'~~~o- -'~o-- _6' ~ 1ft;:.W~J~_.Ç!!Q9»-'ys"@9~ ~ ~~ f¡~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~œœEJ1B~___~~ Table 3 shows that eliminating the northbound left-thru lane and related split phasing (leaving a single northbound left turn lane) slighdy improves the overall intersection LOS as well as reducing the average delay for the movement by approximately 4 seconds per vel-ùcle. TI1e largest positive impact is on the delay would occur on ÙIe souùIbound approach, which explains dIe improved southbound tra~el time. TI1e 95'h percentile queue increases by approximately 50 feet with the single northbound left turn lane. Based on dlese results, it appears that the mitigated option does not substantiallyaffect the northbound approach at 3200 Avenue S/S 320m Street, thereby ~ç.'" EXHIBIT ~, The Transpo Group PAGE--L-OF~ . . . . . , , , . . . , ~ . . . . ~ ~ , , . t ~ . , , , t ~ . . , ~ . \ , t , , , , \ (1 'i, ~t "' EXHIBIT-- .--- PAGE a~-)¡~-uL allowing the mitigated scenario without ~e extension to remain a highly plausible alternative. Vehicle Miles Traveled - System/Circulation Impacts As discussed, City staff requested a system measure focusing on travel time or travel distance under each alternative. In response to this request Transpo utilized the 2020 models developed for each of the alternatives. Since there is not set standard for ù-ùs measure, ù-ùs information is presented for informational purposes only. A sub-area was created from the large model that included the links within the study area previously identified. It extended from S 312m Street to the north, S 320'h Street to the South, Military Road to the east, and 25th Avenue to the west. Verude miles traveled (VM1) equal the number of vehicles on each link, multiplied by the link length. The VMf with the Weyerhaeuser Way extension was found to be 5,470 miles. Without the extension, the VMT was 5,376. As noted, there is less VMT without the new roadway. In general these results are similar. Relative to the size of the City's model being utilized for this analysis, the planned extension is núnimal. As a result, the model may not be refined enough to provide realistic data. The information presented does indicate that ùIe change in VMT would be minor. Benefit/Cost Analysis As noted previously, the planned Weyerhaeuser Way extension would bisect the north parcel property, significantly impacting the development feasibility of the site, To help understand the economic impacts of the Weyerhaeuser Way eXtension, the travel time benefits as noted above were reviewed and put in the context of an economic impact. Based on information provided by Quadrant, the extension of Weyerhaeuser Way would result in a $1.5 to 2.5 tnillion negative economic impact to the project. Tl-ùs figure includes the additional costs of a road to full city arterial standards as well as the loss in development potential for ÙIe site. Based on a total savings of20 seconds for approximately 2221 vehicles during the PM peak hour, for boùl ù1e northbound and souùlbound travel times and a cost of$1.5 to 2.5 million. Tl-ùs equates to a cost per vehicle (PM peak hour) between $6,757 and $11,261. This comparison illustrates that the potential benefits of the Weyerhaeuser Way extension are greatly surpassed by ù1e cost implications of constructing ùIe roadway. Summary TI-ùs study evaluated LOS, travel tinIe, VMT, and a cost/benefit analysis of the planned WeyerhaeusCr Way extension between S 320'" Street and 32od Avenue. Based on the analyses detailed in ù-ùs memorandum, Transpo has found the following information to be true: I Reflects shÍfts in background traffic, plus site traffic dut would likely utiliz~~T~n ~ ',à. t of the Weyerhaeuser Way extension, I;An g I I ---.L.l..!t.' Ô\ PAGE---!-OF ...3.S- The Transpo Group page 9 = .. .. ... ... -tt 't5 ... .. .. ~ ~ ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ . .. -0 ~ ~ ~ .. " ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t t ~' ~ ~ t ... < .f'+ " " \~ i -ö- - - ,',.. ,~, -:...,-""...,. " . EXHIBIT___I PAGE~OF-1IL- 111e Weyerhaeuser Way extension would provide little to no benefit to overall intersection operations at the nine study intersections Excluding site related traffic, the extension would attract approximately 180 additional PM peak hour trips PM peak hour operations would remain at LOS C throughout Ù1e study area with or without the roadway extension, The Weyerhaeuser Way extension would decrease norÙlbound and southbound travel times for vel-ùcles traveling between Weyerhaeuser Way and the planned 32nd A venue S roadway by a total of 20 seconds (NB and SB) per vel-ùcle. A comparison ofVMT between alternatives indicates less VMT (1.7 percent) without the roadway extension. Although the model may not be refined to a detail to provide a truly accurate measurement on such a small scale, the minor change confinns the minin1al impacts previously shown with respect to intersection LOS and corridor travel times, When considering the econonllc impacts and the average travel time savings, the cost equates to between $6,757 and $11,261. Thus, the cost of the planned extension is not proportional to the project impacts assuming no extension of Weyerhaeuser Way. . . . . . Tl1e proposed Weyerhaeuser Way extension is anticipated to provide nominal benefit ùut would be unapparent to Ù1e average driver. Withoutthe Weyerhaeuser Way extension, the planned 32nd A venue S extension would accommodate forecast traffic volumes with essentially ùIe same operating conditions within the study area; the same travel times, and the approximately the same VMT. Therefore, the results indicate that Ù1e Weyerhaeuser Way extension would be redundant. M:\O2\O2282\Comp Plan wuncndmant\O2282ml-\VWE,doc () ~ '" EXHIBIT 1)dl PAGE-LtLOF J5- The Transpo Group page 10 'T I " EXHIBL; --- PAGE_ä)~,J¡t kt .. kI- ,. ~ ~ ~ I .. t I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~. ~. I:. , , .- Attachment A: Synchro LOS Worksheets --exHIBIT--1La£', I . PAGE-ILOF ~ . ~~OQqQQqOQoaQa~~~.~~~~8~~~~Ø..~~~..~~...... .... 135: S 312 St & 28 AvS .>: 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way Extension Wey&meeU5er Wey Ext&n5lon Study 135:S312St&28AvS .> 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeu5er Wey Exten51on Study - f'" - " (" - " ~ t ~ ~ ¡ ";l.;: ¡¡ane",.."^,,,_..._,!:J>Q;!~ t:S,lUIi\'Yt:S a¡'ð'I:¡-I;:¡¡¡Y'!(t:SKFm11/.~N t:S,~!>t:S 1:;l1li1> t:S:JÆSm\~~~ Lane Group Flow (\'Ph) 290 452 100 458 48 52 136 27 534 Q C ell e:uen ~'O\.1!I'IK!J);~¡¡:'¡~,:'!JI,'i" 02~tJ'i~M_rJrf!~\~~~ b M~"~!J!!~m'f!Jt~~1?~l~a_~@ Òû¡¡ûêt""'ength 9SÎh'(ft)l21S"""""i"f6 "'49-~1'8'1'--1',r<""45'ill"'"""¡ê-",K21 - l313"""* ". lR!am_8I¡¡¡¡OK,UI$!t(ID~M'¡.j'~i1_.'_~_--_:iZ':,'.;-'~- ~_-_,i_i1__'ðW._- \;:i;-!'~-,--_-_'_9_"_,_f_',"'-:_'-<J_1_~_'_x_}I'9- ~--_.___-\._il-:_;""'- ~J_2_.4_~\~\~;¡;;- '-' -- ----"" ~'üfêloêkî'ime(%) - -..."" ._,..,'~-, -",.'-<, -"'.' .,oc---,.."'.,,.. .-,..~..,.@,= -',.. ~ ~~~~'!P:f"!\";i<-'4,,~"" ",-"$5,,' ;\f;~,m:Ç£;:"~~'!}w' ~<ì1ii~1<~in"'¡\\'@'j!m8_'d.ll~~I!¡;!)'þ ~ê¡I~Léñgth(ftf .-- ~".,;;t"-",Xj"",Wi"",-H'g¡¡:¡".",."-,,.}\,,,Ç(!,¡¡..,;;"j:W:';;,,,-,-~1J-_"'.""Sit,:",_,..._--,.. 'e- ~lW'lS.1.~:e~~'xI;:;~~ìJE;:; ;;;~"¡~;;1~~}~~~¡jI~~ 95th Bay Block Time "A ~.I!Í. ~~ ~.§]}~~'h~j$c~~¡,¡¡,;¡jj[~¡þ;¡ ;~ì.~iE~;ô£i:'i'i,~'~'1~jIj.~_!f~j!Ji M:\O2\02282\Comp Plan emmendmant\Synchrol2020 with Weyer EX!..5y6 2/16/04 Peg& 3 L8neCor~gurations -----."\ -,t.I"'! 'fö<,'I.-'fö",': 1:!~al.E!Ow C, ìI lk,OO~~:!'~:~~r!1OO~F19~:9'OOj;',¡¡fJ!'()5~~ LeneVV!dth 12 11 2 12 11 12, 12 11 12 12 11 12 G?'õd'~ ) ~jft$1\~~.liîít~?~,p>¿:irn~\\~p~~?,::);)l %'}~~J~~~ì1 rôl¡'iCosltlm&'(š\ ,,^ 5.0 5.0 ""5:0 ' '5,O"'5:Ó "5'.6' 5,0 . ~ 5,0 '5~Ò . t 8 n e )J~r: ¡::~ c:tò. ~~~,1iP.9æEoo~~J 10~'~1J.°~.f.°~~'!i~:.:;\' :0 O;:W;:;~i~~f1!m~~,OO1B1 Frp~. ped/hlkel 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0,96 1.00 0,99 1,00 0,98 !;! ~ !> ~ p~~ e ~ ~~~O;,8 J!!~'R? ~~~9:!~'¡'~1;Y.o.~æ..01'fj~$;;§fO 0- :::i.:Ù,'£;!\'2~P! ,~.9~:~ ,rt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1,00 0.85 1.00 0,92 1.00 0,92 1;); ~rO:.ec! e<! ¡;. : '~~...;' ;t~':: :ìèOi!1.~a1ipq~~~;~~;!J'f$trO_;l~1JO....ol'¡;,IY;tr5--~r;¡:1:0~iš'fR;:; \1.;¡;w,'!.;OO~~ Said. F!ow (prOI) 1721 1722 1738 1783 1509 1751 1630 - 1748 1625 ~ ë~:!!~. :<;::. ';. d.;~;; , 0 i~P"1Loo~t?i1]'wi~ °T4',~& 1jtJ(J;,2?,'ïo~0'1Il!=tt3~: i~'~'OO ~/r;'i":"'1"tO:I!'If~J) IJIJ ~7~J. SOld. Flow (pe~) 730 1722 748 1783 1509 417 1630 1231 1625 V. Çf~::D It. (yp ~)' ~~~~ 2.!!Q'JØ.3..9j~~..~Jkti$1.0.9.#ì;15,8,_l\I6J,~æ~ 2þi*~, 64 J!Í;ii';j'i72;f.i\t ~?"2 6~m 2, ~ ~ P~e~o!'lourrac~or,P!-'~ .1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 ~;:::~:~, i v;> "):';:~,f'¡¡~:t~~'(,~-~~~S:E5,:lr;:,~~~Z2~;':l.~eD7~ Lane Group F!ow (v-;'I) 290 452 0 100 ,(58 ,(8 52 136 0 27 53,( o C'õIí~ s, ( ",T' r) "".":::! R,'.\'Iî!J¡~1.P~~P m-., P~' O~ 1. P ~lO ,i'ð'~.\1&1 Oí!m ~O~~ 7urn ïy;>& Perm Perm Perm P~rm Perm i;'::o',~ ëa, ~ ~ 11 § e s J".~~;.. ~~'1f~_~.là~~~;~:t~~v;~~'iËß~~- ~ "e,.,."i~~ed P'Iue5 4 8 8 2 6 ~ T I!ã: G~~.~. ( S ) Z, 2 ~¡O~~J ~~2~:P~~.;.CJ~ ¡@;Ü'T17,¡Z $.:.!:Tt}¡{t~1.4J~',Z ~ !:I',ec:lve G~en, ç (5) 24'] 24.0 24,0 24,0 24.0 18.2 16,2 18.2 18,2 . ~ ~ fe ëI:è ~~l 'õ]~." ...0 ~~ð_.>iltt¡~:~P.Ø:~,"01~~r,i;:Q:~5i~~Œ:'Rim~ ~ 9_~1 Clearance TI."e (5) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6,0 6,0 6,0 V èI1 rer d; EJI'.!'I ~ ~()n. (s J ~~¡{;'O~"¡P~;¡1f:$'¡{;;Ö.~2IP~¡O!t~~,*1i2;O>"!'$~(¡ì~J¥~T~~~ Len& Grp CnD (yo;h) 336 792 344 820 694 145 566 429 567 Y ~!;'!3. Þ :'O..t:(() :~11"";} ';:~"l ~\!¡2~':¡!iI'i'mUWßi\.o'~_f!~,4;,O":O:~~ v/5ReUoPerm cO.40 0.13 0.030.12 0,02 Y !.~.R,I! II 0', fM\"" r. ¡,¡ö.l~ .'..'ó:': ;. 0 i.~"~J?ÌIib~I¡¡;¡.WX11~9i2J!mJ.OJ5!!.~o.;tl}:_(;;,~~;,!,)'2i1~?J~d;n~f;tJ;tm,lI'l\ OJ ij"~ Uni'o~ Deley. d1 12.6 10.3 8,8 10.2 7.9 12.7 12.~ 11.3 18,5 ~~. S 5 ! c ~ .I;, B ,c ~ c r d ,,~.....] ~1..~j;~I¡¡iimfliS¡tij;!9:O"Xo:oll1~.i&!!ï;¡ 9.Okl;~O:O~~1;O:O~ I~creme~te! De!ny, d2 19.2 0.6 0,2 0.5 0,0 0,6 0,1 0,0 23.9 (;. e; ~ Y. ( S )~~,,~~~œ -;¡~!I.R!1.~AlI.g!QJZ._~,91.1;3~iW1~¡~ Levelo'.Se'VIce C B A B A B B B D ~ ~~~~, ~I ø:f. ¡s) {.,,;';.I¡;:::~{4ii.~~'I!~'W-'!g:~'D¡;;~J(\;,¡,¡,!2:¡~;;".:t-<-¡;¡f¡.¡1i¥~.:t~J.U~iI Aøpronch LOS B B B 0 (t'j11lCl e CI ~ 111 wy;¡¡¡w,-'\--iÍ¡_r<l.w£'li4mm.¡1¡1;ijUà~W;jj ¡r.,)! ...j~\ir\~1 ¡: ~tltOOj ~~ HCM Averag& Control Deley 21.3 HCM Level of ServIce C - ~ÆPl~m!fj.~()lC.!~~JYÐ Y,~t~~!f.I#!_Æ~~Id;.~~\T;1{1~ Actual&d Cycle Length (5) 52.2 Sum of 1051 time (5) 10.0 !l)t~~1I9'...Oi~.aReçL t9l!1l1!.Q~~!!:o.Jlmll!1iii.~:jJ 11 1tiRf,_IP ~ iK ~'yè 1;0 fi§e~l~t.;:£! f~'~~~,"~"-~ c Critical Lane Group .: ' m (JJ '~ ' '0 .. ¡-' M:\02\02282\Comp PI en ammendmentlSynchro12020 with Weyer Ext..5y6 .. 't' 211~ \JiIgel4 -"""" . .' :: ~ - i 1m er:J ecQ9 ¡¡,~ m I!tY -~N1>IIm- !.11i!;w.¡;~Wßjj!t'\\1. _ill._WlM1ßilin.~m.\'WHW.m -9 5 tm'l!itël'flllliW6l\1 ""It'e JêCð ed ~'Cå ps Cllyz'q U'60 effflày, be.1 ÖhgeCii;, """"""""';;((M¡"""'iM""'!\"'ä__'_~ =Å"~_.__"""""_,""Æ_.__-_..,,",.,-,,,..'-!,_.._,._.. ,--.,', ...f.~'"",'..#.""""-¡"'-"-;'-- yueue shown II-mexfmum eft&r two eye!&I. ~m ø>< m:C ~m r;:¡ 0 þ\!: THETAALVl:3-FF51 ~~qQQQQqqqqoa~aqq~.~~~Q~~~~~~..~~~..~~...... 219: S 320 St & Gateway Blvd S ~ "ð-~ ./ - ~ - ~ t \". + 219: S 320 St & Gateway Blvd S c?-'5~ì J: '--to; ~ 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way EJctenslon Weyemaeu!er Way EJrten!Ion Study 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way EJctenslon Weyemaeu!er Way EJrtenslon Study .. - " ~ t I' \". + ;I:;: 1!II1)j!!JI:OUP.II"",""",~J:B4~1:t:!;I~NYJ: ~y.¡t:!:~,NB~I t:!_I~ t:!I.'1nii~/:!;¡,IIj¡D.\1-'!!A¡,y_il-~'-'!':I1~jTh'\!'4 Lane Group Flow (vph) ~ 1905 31 1988 49 73 399 105 R 11 !U..! ¡¡c .!!l g JIj'¡:~.£1!!W;t ) ~ ~:;m[ 4~Jt ~ r !¡\ 1 ¡ ~ ~ ~ :. > '+ 't. 2 ~ ~ , ~ -- { Sb: ~ ¡¡, '!¡? J.m '\Wœ¡ m ~ ~ \ W!ì ~ Queue length 95th (II) 1/139 548 m53 11638 53 35 #488 39 ~47S"þ1Wm.:.rgO)'1".,' !;mni;C\"'504~i1l5-S-a~ roiïiûiíèÎõaïtiñìë~"~"'<"-';""o'" ><'ï'-~¡;!""'""":"~'; "_à~!i""u'r.:"!""",,..:,, ., -" - - ~ ~ ~$5ä!¡¡m:.~.\J~ )~iif1\$!&~, 8 ~~ 3:'~1i:;&-i¡i~¡j1'K:;;;F;1f:L~~¡~."i£il~¡~ ,. Tum Bay length (It) 50 50 75 100 ~..~¡, '%-!!1,!"iœ.5~Wi'3"~~"~'"%?Ç~1!~6..'i'>êi,-",,~..~~,"[I;T:îì'h_~~ 95ih'è-.y~fíiìï'é%'6Ö~"'+;gŽ"Å.; ;0/10%' 53¡¡.".-:;!,..:"...W,fA:ii;t"";':53'X:~i.ym.:iW"ä - -- "":,, ~ -... --, ! !- .. ..- - _! -_!_-. !tQJ.,g¡ JlgJt:.~~1œiZ S~1'!~:;m~-@.~~j_¡~.j~i*ffJ~~.:t~~M\ ~"ïß:¡;'\!iJI!Î!~~ffi$t{j In! ~ m ZICi' -~~m>ø~i~1!1!~.;:_>ýH~Ð'ÆMfW~òt>~:4;I;~IHf__m'4 ~.!t!iÞ~'lJt ~ê!90 ram:.8'<!Iìt~Æ~iitc:s Þ!é!J~ 1!.'&.6: èlm8Y:IJ,i!.J ,O,QQ ~t;lf;'¡¿r~¿:.ir.*~~l Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles. ' mi~~I[Ll!1e.\!.~'!~!\1¡:r!¿rC6Q~1~ûeJ:ra1¡~7îif~]¡bjiUì5s{t~'ãti\;:iijghal;r:u;.:j:Vir¡:mY~¥fi&'Æ¥'.fß~È~4W,;¡j ~'Oyer:'lf'.~I;~_..,-¡:.~,!:',,~'~?,._t: t:!':;:Œ,t:I:.I:!!".!= I'J,~ ","::y, !j~ ~":. V'¡-:j,Ii,~'<Y;~~!J'I..Bt,,"!\hNI:-'þ';r.~t:!~~.j!",-::¡t:!~ltIt";:1'J Icm!.~~ L80e Cor~¡jur.!lo~' 'I ~~-;. '\ ~~1+ : - '\ 1+ - - '\ 1+- r~D:Tð,W;(~I) },,!Ú'.., ~~~900'""'".f900, ,"'1 9öò~rm:o~7 .1~r007::j9'OO.:~~~ LaneW<!!!'I 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 11 12 a~8è'.a.(~):à-7,.-;;";C:"";i7'~:~;;:)...¿p;2~::."," ': -.;.:.~,~",~,:: :':_~~; :'::1":d:E~5?1ì~~~~~~ To!al Lolt t'me (s) 5.0 5,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ~~I'!);n;:F.: ~o';:';:~~';C.O iiF.9 :,.r".' ',. ~ ,.:~ ~ :::0 :-o-.g;'ij_~m~J::'r:OO'(l¡~;¡~~;~~h.'t\\!J!f.i.:~'i'.#~ Frp~. ped!",)~es 1.00 1.00 1.:0 1.00 1.00 0,97 1.00 0.97 'TP.~.: pe_d!~I~eš:;"'.::t~~ '-'.~9 J. ~,~OO.>:"'.i ,; ::: r: C'O7: ~qq':ìJ~~tj.~!!fj:;¡;,Jrol::~,..~P! ~.\I,~1,)!JC!~~ Fr'. 1.00 1.00 1.C:) :),99 1.00 0.87 1.00 0,85 f;~I:~of!!C~~", .;:,~.."...,:; ,,;:: O'~,~,:,~'~.'oo,,:':.~;':' ""'O:~5 . - ~ :gþ,¿¡ì:t:Óf§\,MöJr5":!"I:11ÖOf~&r~r'1S:0;9:;.~[.~~'î~~ Sa!d. Flow (pro!) 1752 A9og 17~~ ~O77 1309 1181 1616 1541 ~~~tX!i\&.-:~.:.~:.~?,a-:J;t'ð];,:;:'io.'. ~;':O:95' " 1 :ðQii~EOI~;~;FOO-¡~'¡¡¡[~B.o;Z<'.:~«ä Said. Flow (D!~) ~752 4909 '795 5:)77 949 1161 1207 1541 ~0I.u:':"e~(V;¡h)}';-¡-::'t'~::i:1:~¿C04.~i'1.B~3,~!!: ,!,,32':" 3; -, ~ e36:%tfi},52!i1J?!49¡;!{1't;B':(;¡\i65;1f~399,~~6~.~~ Pea~.~our!ac!o', Pf-IF 1,00 1.00 1.00 :,00 ~,OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00, 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~:æõW:~!;'W.l"..ct? u!~ !JoI'?£-.i.1S].J-.:;1 :.~ 3 2:'~::r: "::-1 e !S~2~~~,9;!:rt~8~e5;œ39~~"_~ La~eG"OlJpFlow(.....~) 94 11'05 0 3~ :988 0 49 73 0 399 105 0 œ.~i".SW!!ìi""~.,;:::-"-,~o;¡x~'O;;¡:,'::',,"O-'?"':"~C ,,',:, ,;i1>~~10':":'~\t~Ol:.~icr¡a,o~I\i.?,'u~.JO HeaŸy Ve~!cles (%) " 2~~' 2~~ ., 2~~ ' . ; % ,òÆ> 1 óÆ> ' 30%' - 30% 30òÆ> 0%'- 0% - 0% £!üTBn5~lIiiÇëi1'.':i ~~ ~""O". . ~:!' '0';-; '11'O~~O'::' --)"'~ 0 :\I:;"!"'8>~" 11):!;7<,~'O,~,ISO Tum Type Pro I Pro! Perm Perm p"~1~1é""d'?~ö:m'lH'r.;,;-;J~'¡:;)~¡~.2,~~:"':' ":,', " "16I!liØM~lii;::¡;ir~~itl!l)¡¡if;.¡':,~_~JI}\'f,œm °e~:~ed P!'Iases 4 8 ~ ~.!~,d ,a~e!!Œ .,a.( I ì [[".,12 ,6 ¡",.?!.. ~....,;;;,~(.,:;, . :nrr.4 ~~i~2&~Jm:4tJ:A.;;'~¡f.~p.!.~aAp:~l~~lI Et!ec!ive G:-ee~. g (I) 11.6 57.9 3.6 49.9 39.5 39.5 39.5 39.5 ~.~'l!..Ð)Ð!,=. 0'~;;&.~;I,9,í1":~1!. (j,1.9¡;¡,!.9 ,~{ì:..I-!. :'!F.'¡- , ;. ¡¡~:rç; 0 .1&.~~Ni!\o¡¡3!1~&~j~q!~~~~ Clearance 7ime (I) 4.0 5,0 A.O 5,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ~e~s,O~:(5Jn.'[-¡2,O! ",¡J'2,é~~~.':!:O¥~~t>2CO&2:O1j::;zai'!;:øne¡¡~2¡O~"2¡~ Lane Grp CaD (vph) 175 2450 56 218-4 323 402 411 525 ÍI~r;¡ilUb:P~~" ;;..;:.~.!:.I C:C~39!!!~ ::O".OZ'..cO.3'9~~_j:: "-':0.06;1~r.~~omø vii Ratio Perm 0.05 cO,33 ~~Ð!I o",:~.<t,:~¡;:<o.;.~~h O.~,!i~U; ~ B.!!~,,:. ".: ,':-;0:55 ." 0: ~J~Jfj$~1k~1:1S:Y\;:O~1eY~f;;;ii~Oj9.1ia~¡2~ U~;~o..,.,Delay.d1 A9,6 23,8 55A 3:,0 26,6 28,9 37.7 27.1 ~i!iõ~J:'6~rL~"I\'J>:m:Oj!l¡;'!roo~.."~,,. ""1 :C3:,' 'o:e'2~?';\;;t:ooi~~f;O:Ul~-'UU~ l~crem~~!aIOe'ey.d2 1,6 2,5 60 6,5 0,1 0,1 36,5 0.1- rJ.ã!m~)~'¡:;~~1;7~6;:f!?.;;;:>:';,:,:ß3:'2'" 3~_ß";nr;27~0;;'~~¡è\"1'II'iJ.~~.ç¡-~ Level o! Se"Vice D C E C C C E C þ.fþ.tiøc!r,Delli'n!);:"::':!:~'~"~;:f2':5~; ~:':~ ~-:..., 32:5:r;¡~~~~~;t;:, 28.9- .A.pp!'Onc!'l LOS C C C .:gm ø>< m:J: ~~ 0 ~I!: d'<I\1f,'!" P8ge'S ~J !-..' , l'",4 HCM Average Control Delay 33.6 HCM Level of Service C t!S".w.i~/Sg1ìl~j,tp_lI;:.~ P.~ ~.MJ:I!t.!~~ólt1.Y_~~~; Äj~~~~..fl;¡;; Actuated Cycle Length (I) 116.0 Sum of lo!! time (I) 10,0 mte!!e<:yß~t£e~~I9i1!ffl1JfJìfIÇD!.IV~~r4:~'~,W¡£:9CU:Cëya1?çfl~é1'ÿfEe'1l1?; - -. 7::;'='::',f3;D'~å'..;11 c Critical Lane Group M:\O2\O22S2\Comp Plan ammendma~tISynchro\2020 with Weyer EJrt..sy6 THETRALVL3-FF51 2/18/04 Page 5 M¡\o21022821Comp Plan ammendmentlSynchro\2020 with Weyer EJrt..!y6 THETRALVL3-FF51 u:. r . ~ 6 ~ " ø ~ ð " ( ð t:I ð ð " tJ " " ~ tJ t) . . ~ ~ ~ ~, '~ ~ ,j ,j ,);) ¡ . ,¡ ¡ ~ ¡ .¡-~ - ~ ..- '.. ¡ ..¡ 220: 5 320 51 & 1-5 58 . 320 Ramp ./.: ...... ....." . 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Wey~mMus~rWsyExt~/!slon s!uðy 220: S 320 SI & 1.5 58 - 320 RamQ........- 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuser Way Exte/!sfOrl Study ....." ~ ..- "- ~ t ,.. \. + ~,. Moyem&l1!!-\\tJ¥i~;;~)ji,~'1l;¡p;.!f:t:I¡"rní.t:t:I'f~n!::tJ~ai'IVt:I¡¡"~~VV!:IJ ~VV:jl:{fJ1!'),Nt:lIR,;rN t:I h~¡¡: Nt:I¡N.,w;.~t:I¡¡¡;r,,;StJl a~t:l6!J Lsne Configuretions;L:ttt,~ .,,'j'j tH ,'. . . .. . "j . +t ar. 'dð e[F1õW'(~~.~O ~¡¡¡m,"'¡J .i'I!9'!\!'f'g:(ór;;'\~~öO')'J19öOE~!{j(j'; "'MO'!1:'4f9tXJ",..j !;('i¡j~91 \~1'îOð .~.,~~_."..,',"" .,.!IM-'~,~k1!lM;.""",~r'!,."h,..,.. _."...',""...,~.-.. . ,...",.,....".....,.,C>.,." 0>'\""'" Grade (%) 1% 0% 2% 2% ~o"""_.)" ',,'--.' ,,---,....n~"'O.'<\5"'-':!:1?'O'1"':!~r;~';,',,?,,;....._~~~.~ " . ,~'~,u"'~r\o ""--0,' -"","'i~v,-",""y'AA¡'."v",,";p. ,,":,'W-""'i'i"".'.,,--l. /'" ,'h".;.;"';f"'"".V,:.v.""":'¡¡!"""\~!~ 8ñëÛ¡¡i:F8êíôr .. ,. ", ""0.91 1,00' 0:97 0.91 .". ,. " "(),95Õ:95" O:-tS !;œ!!'~p~ItJ)!!!., ~~". ;¿,~ ;!. ::;',;:1:! !.:;1:~;~~~110'(),'rj;'(J:;OO;¡;f'(,~~j~i:;~~7;:,;!!,':'IT'2"d;;"",¡,'fJO"e;~iJ.1..~ Flpb,pedlblkes 1.001.001.001.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 ~~ :.:/: '~.' ~ .~:, ¡ :~1.~ ;¡:'), . ca;::tr,B5.t!iì1::1 ,\90:i~¡:¡(1W~~&~¡ji%1¡;¡;:!1r;:' ~::-¡£ft~t (j9.q~~, '. oo~~,~ Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0,95 0,96 1.00 ~~~@¡ :,\:;. ~ ¡R~.: ~:d,. J. !!9:rJ.-ii;.: 4i~Ji;BAg¡'¡5:r:r~i'~t¡iJm§.Z;r", ~c;Æf':;;~B"~6.6:f'.?.;r:ð&~~...i Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0,95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 ;satd~ç)6V1;{P&i'IT'J ~'-". ,-'c' ~. .,o""1.5011';:,:-,'_4.4Sti£3'I'!j'i;i't!51~t@¡;¿"'%\n';-¿'dh¡;tè:gr,.~~¡:YJ.~.~:~_BL~3ð~ MI) e ~ p ~ tJ, t'~1. =\Im\V I: ~ 'W&JlV. tJ..1 fmP ~ ¡..111t,~ tJ.t ~ t:It':\;.~{~!~!¡'~1~I¡¡m'!1m~mmI!!ïI.u II Lane Group Flow (vph) 1485 852 274 1392 263 277 627 BY!. II . ~ !!l ~ '-!læ!i ~ ~ ; \ ~;~.1r¡~'Ll ð J i" J: '1f;! ~ , Z !5 Øi 2'g If;.¡¡~~, 'I :! '1'!'V .1"1 1. V ~ ~ 1t!!î .. ì. ìI * i! ;,.~: ~ ~ 'flJ¡;:; ~ Queue Length 95th (tt) 93 m176 151 156 286 302 179 ~~~r-¡;,¡* ,.~-1tt~. 9 Z2 r.:1~~7:1-m¡g,"'~Iiß~-'.~>§-~~' ðõiñùP~êiõêkTm;ë(%)-ü_.:"."".:,J.~', ,1'.. ..."jimi?$.,.'"c.J,A.""., .9,;.,\~",- .,"",.".}. .""..' .,.. .,0' S 51!\lv FJ'B 19S!<ã~~.te~~:&¡~1'"è\:t'JJ\1: )1J'ff2:Jjfi!'~_~~>!'WIw~iK¡¡¡~%"æ Tum e~renOth (ft)' ~225' 'foo . . .",,' . ..,-, """., 700 ~ .", w.",. .".. ~~Jri'",,"""i""""~':"'#;:""":""~("""""W,"-1!¥.'~'"&~m'--"" 9Šiiïê8Y1Iiõëkfiiñe-%-c.;;nif"..",.._.\!f"~¡i~'¡.il~'Sii.i:f."i(Ù",:",iot#",,""';':'."". ;:'¡h~. ",..'At1Mi,à.U:W.i:¡,. " .1t!I<1. ." . ',;\t< R l!.. !;Q!!L g ~ ~ œ; ~ ~ ?-li.!i¡t¡¡.. ~ ~ 3'?1t £1.- Q . ~ f :kß ill m ' ~ ! ~ ~ 1 :1l1M - . ~ iR.. 'Wil&ííl¡B; ~ j ;,; ~~m8IY_~~~\1\~~"~~~1!Ii;I&"ij;1I _YÆ.am~..Rt!Jìl5!~~.I~.zqÜ e)ií¡¡-;!!îm~.t..ði;ji:c!ilS~~~$t ~¡¡-~.\! I g h a IJl$.';i;~'~!fI,\~* ~m ø)( m:i: ~~ 0 ~ ~~.. Volume (vph) 0 1485 852 274 1392 0 0 0 0 520 20 621 ~.!~:!1~.:r;~ 0 r:-. !;'B~~~~ ~ ){£J¡OOm~.~'!;p!J ;¡ïQ1; ~~:;;f\OCJ~'!':OOB.'Jgö.~Jò~),t¡g Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1485 852 274 1392 0 0 0 0 520 20 627 !iÆ\ ~¡;,\.?fð.Þø~,~ ~)..' ¡, ';;jP ."'ii1 ~8,~g~:Z~;2¡¡[;¿Z;:'~'-:¿.11.2¡¡¡;"O~Jt\'40J!"4ì\{\o J",p¡;çi,lOj1~;2!j~¡¡ «J~!,;'¡:~ Conn. Peds. (#l!1r) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Iîß 8'tfbY ð b Tel e *R %~ ~ % I "~'= 3 :'¡\G'r~,1; 1~¡j~î\""1;(.';~ì ljIj1imìWl"~m ~~' N~r~ ~~ rn.-¡¡t¡¡~ Tum Type Perm Prot Split custom œ..~æ~i8~~~"1tt1!Z..- ~~~~~?i~ill5~~_~~q Permitted Phases 2 ~M~ J ~\3 ~!l~R~)~6.~[~.,~ ~'%W; 0',~8 ~ ;~ .4~~~w;1j~';§;t;,: -¡;:!',j;Þ:;Vi¡'¡'8i1;Si.%'i:~\ 1.~2 ;¿~~;J];..q EtfectlveGreen,g(s) 66.466.413,069.4 21.621.636.6 ~~~.d(Øl,~~}I.9~¡§.;_qr~iìî1f!;1 \' ¡i¡ãj[)i !W>'{~_ííiiÆl~1~Ë jâi'!Ji.æ:~~"'f.'j~í~A!J [,9 .ŒR.¡I;!I J1!~~.~ Clearance TIme (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Y. ì!l'\TCI &ì EX! é n 510 n U $}---_..I&Wi2\ U~~:ßO.l!1'Jffi2¡Q~;Q~~;¡O;<41!@;1~~!;;1:~>9.;¡¡¡ ,Ol.~' ~~ --.. LilneGrpCep(vph) 2868 829 389 3073 310 312 1128 !~~~ ~t'Þ~~<:u,ijJ g.t¡¡ZJ~~.~1¿¡~.;'-;;Z1¥j(~<;ø.~Q ,1.. B .§.ÇQ!1, ~¡'íþ, wla. vis Rello Perm cO.59 E!1!9 ~9~ìÞ~ :¡'fiÍ~¡.oiL- (Ji! ~~~~j~\tÆïi:~¡""'¡gij¡~ o.,8~a!J.'!' :,!jm.~~ Uniform Deley, d1 15,1 24.8 49,6 12.8 45,6 46,0 33.0 ¡;æg.í!t$Æ,g'!!;!¡~Ep,r_"'fir!Q;2¡~"1!Jl¡¡¡¡N,p¡~3;m;P'(eoJ~~,\;r.W:q!-!,\~~j~";'~~3u.o.R\1i,çg3.."'A1i9';! Incrementel Deley, d2 0.4 32.1 4.2 0,4 18.3 24.2 0.3 !:J ~!ay.. t! )~í~1m.~r~t'ø~L'!~ H!!i~lJU;Q~:£~Iê!œ~~,;;1ITQ¡;;':¡;{\1" =¡.~:~ Level of Service A FDA E ,,[. ','""" 3'0, '0 "':!<'t>~"""""f",t,,%;,10'O7':W4""",',',' ,,' ~f',t~~æ¡¡....!ë!î&.~fii!,""""'~""'c 'B£ldj..-!íI\'t!:í.;~~:r:L",x"Ä""'""""""'.'"';"'" ,..." , ' rot m \lCl1OfIt I:)Uí!\ m ary;'¡~I~~~};!.i.tIl'ì¡MJi¡!f.!;.~\~;mn!i\l.*~¡n;¡¡£\\.'\iiìJ.6M;í!1(~*'t¡~~ HCM Aversge Control Deley' 31.1 HCM Level of Service C ' - IJ..C~öum.e'¡'!Otr,;ep8C¡!Yir,IIUO~mij'j,¡..oi'i!6i1l~¡¡-~~i:_,~,"J'.'" ','~",~ "'~"""",....,..-.._,.,.= ..",. """"""""","~""""""""".,,, ~~~;:"""'~,' ,', '., I_....J, c Cr1I1C81 Lene Group :ï ! , I, ; ,'t-" ,,"-J M:\OZ\O2282\Comp PI en emmendment\Synchro\2020 with Weyer Ext.sy6 2/16/04 Pege 7 M:\02\02282\Comp Plan emmendmen!\Synchro\2020 with Weyer Ext..sy6 THETRALVL3-FF51 THETRALVL3-FF51 .. t:I ~ ~, G' . .., '-, " " ~, W fI (, " (I - ,. ( rø r¡p fi . ~ rø t1I ~ ~ . t8 t ~ .." . .. . '41 .. .. .' ....,... 221: S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ramp 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuser Way Ex1ension Study 221: S 320 St & 320 - -5 NB Ram) 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemeeuser Way Ex1enslon Study -.. "') - ~ t .J' ~ "') (" - " ~ t ~ ~ + .¡ Iœ n 8.2urou p ~ ~ : ~! 4~ ~);IJ:<y f:".Mt N BI.Ij'jf¡' N ~'I ,~~Y;;¡¡¡i>?~>f¡1\I~i~i!i"l\l!:;"~1i5!l1~liiII'lR~1 Lene Group Flow ('I)h) 1160 845 1217 518 454 Q1 e u me n g lIt~i( II) _9T!"~87jf.~ ~B:MJeY7~;~ i~{r:?'.: ¡'i¡,'i',,!!:i:c ,:~ . "ii";. !ktm~ì,~¡m~";;{i~ oüëûe LêñgÎÎt95th (ft) '{3/r"'2'5' "'à5- ~i6' 407'" ,.......~... """",~"~,,, ~ntèrtta¡'lßnK1O1~t'-!nmt~!J, 2,2,:rn,' '!,i1';'~~!',7,)!, t":'~+~~,7"Y13,7, 2',',~',rê""',;,",A',.',:",~,?,~~',"~,r,>"',',,',",. i"',~'*,,':&",'~,~,"""" ,,','oj 5OiiìUPBlodI ìinê(%) ., :",.."".::."..M',....'I:1....... ."'. "~",, ":':""",~,".,.' ^"":.,,,~--., L.._"'",,'."."¡,'>--'" ~ ep¡B ~ e :\ ~ ~ ~ '1î' *' ~ {ì¡~.I'i~¡ ... i ( ! ; ì ;; ; ; t f : ' .. 3411 ' . ' , ; ; ì " i\Þ.1:£!!I,¡ ~ ; 1 b W\ii';~j1BU'I,î'~* ;j¡J ¡;; '* ~ ~ ~ 'Y ( ¡ÜiTÍì!aYLength(II)'. ",,", '"~25i)" ,.=". 2ÔCr ",h.' ". ..N'< .. d,.. o'. '.. ,. ~mB~,Bl~~NY.~~,'~_:I;:I!<'>'S'0J0::;&:':2SW>~"'f ,; ;~"r~.I!!i~'._~~ìt~~"~l" 9w,~ë¡r/'àÎóê!I Tfme % ' """"""':'#~¡r':4'!Ä\:;'¡""I!<5:4%"'" 30'0,..:""",."</-'1'1';;;'1",,,:,;1':,(, ,\, 11", Æ1 ,,' , ,,' ,..Ií¥' HQ!IMg~~J,~¡fu.'.\1'!lüt¡~tt~ç8!J,~"2Æ1~~t'iit:ðVi,~_Øj~\'!~Dm~ II' ~ve m en t~~-':~1!I,~!~j1ilt:6!:J11~jt:tll,f~,t.tlK:t¡l;v:'I Bu:,r¡~VV1:J.r,W;v:'I6 ~ I'II:!L~~pN B 1,~HI'IBK¡~~,\::; B ~'1¡,'tf;:¡tI,l;;¡ "".I::S ~ I 01 ~ ~ J'(U)(Y ~'¡ffij!~~!:¡,>AW"!m¡:;,~,)\j~¡~~.l;\!~m.!~j' L.~e Configurations, ':(\ 'tt-r- ,',: r " ,tt,-r- '! 4- r éëaTJ:1~(9I'ffi3llUV_J.9.ð!'.i&!i1~1Ii'r9:o<1,~"Ø!jðO>'.;19.ÖO;;;:wrotr;~1;:9õ()" , '1900""( '1 gOO'!]11íÖÖÆ:i'lÞ~~ G"'de(%) 1% -1% 2% 3% "';<""M"ro""""õ:'!S)~." '~"~":> opo t1 t!~>..!o!'ii7'.~~""'OT'~50" ",T":""-",~"'1"T'~,T~~ ,~,a.',L"~}~,~!~:._~_. " iii,.,,; ,.,.",'.",A"""".",..":,.,<>.,"i*,J,;",..,....,,,,~. .. ,.", '," , <..,."~:,,,,;;T..'-!>'!I!>-"- Le~e Uti/. ~ector 0.88 0,86 0,91 0,95 0,95 ~ ~¡~1I&~~1i.og~1»!P$~:jl!¡g;\!~0.'\rtr~7\¥~J1:.oo\'. ,0 :91": ~:';!¡ ¡..,~~~( "i~~ lli'~ FI~~, pedlblkes 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 I".~¡~~~~ l1;g¡¡&OiB ~~¡;"q O']'ST~iI:J:'¡t~~ím)õ!F 0:88.'" :Wi ;"T.,i~';;~¡h1 ;~~.~ ~'iPro:ecled""~" 1'.00 (00"""""1.00""'" 0.95' 0,99""""""'" "" ~~~~i~~íi~5f. B;~~ì~ It'" ,~~~. '7' ,';:Z:: >B'm1Œ~tfi~ SÃ'!i1;"FIòW{p~rrn)g;~~~?,,~"35~~")i!'?'5<)13't~jo;;,.~'G'S1'>. ',,'1500' , .,',;;;:~<:~';'-'-¡":':Y-«~;~~,¥,j¡.~ V~lum"('I)h) 0 110-4 901 a 1058 159 608 0 36-4 0 0 0 ~ : ê\)!ilJ\'~'_o..Gl~ ~Æ!i!.._1l~.o Jî1I#.1ÆOOJ~,:J,~~~.I¡1; OO¡~gO{)~19.~~ A~!.Flow('I)h) 0 110-4 901 0 1058 159 a08 0 3a4 0 0 0 L ~ ë. EI)..; í.PP~.iJllo.\y';(YP1) )~~moJ!It2~~""I1iO~~¡Þr:'43~;~il!'~~ Q,'EÍ,~u~i¥~ g co~n. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 ' 10 10 f'. e a VI: ye D I CI EI sJ{;r.) ~~~~~~;¿!jbm¥.1'!\}.1 ,~,I> WB1 !j~:~ ~,.~~ ,r'\>j.1i!~1 ~~~1.$ 7um Type Free Split f1 fèTëëI ~ ~ &a~â.~~~¡j~¡¡¡€ :'~¡'f::¡:r:~.;f~~~~~ p¡;;;ir.ë'd Phesês Free ' , . h 'w' . , , . AC:u Ð \ /XI ~ 1'6'ð~')~eb.~f~}~lte~ !B:--&3~~~7~~~Q~~ E~fêê:!vëGrëën.g(sr" 69.8 116.0 '69.8 ' 38.2 "36:2 ..",. . .~ ,. ' ~ -~: ~~¡~ÇL.\H.QP.m.,¡£'~!r~~,OWh<f.~g!;¡ l.R@ J,M,~;~-~"t!J C'e8n!1'1Ce Time (s) 5,0 5.0 4.0 4,0 t 'C!!'~I fJ) ~ en! 1 0 ft!( !J~2, 0 ~~'%!MIiìÞ~2, O¡R&i!ii.~¡/.l';fi2~~¡¡"~~~\~~ ;gm ø>< m~ ~~ 0 -n, ÞI;' Lft~eGrpCep('I)h) 2856 1355 3016 525 4a8 V!i:l!ðl~w.t~~~.~'\~M'J¡f:!<¡:'0!2:~¡§(\!j¡~"il~9)~;m!'fCß3 O:l:Jt~?~~m"1.~~H~ v!s RAtio Perm cO.82 ~ [~:B U!?~~g~1¡_q( ~;.:~r:iw.:;;¡¡¡;;J¡l.°T.f();i';.,¡;j:;t~¡¡;¡~" u,\JI1jj¡;;9':9Ã{:~~<Ól1i":'TiI!~;X~W.1I t:.I~OrM Deley. d1 12.2 0,0 12.2 39.7 39,4 !;;!"C?\Ir!.~,~.2..~~c;!.~.J¡¡'P'.9"M,fÆ;;~g~~ì1i¡¡¡'~ ~9P¡t";f,.o.P1¡¡'J¡~j;)~Ì!Ò.~..~iiEm¡¡¡9 Incremental Delay. d2 0.4 1.8 0.4 35.4 33.7 g II 111')'.[5) B~JS¡~ :~J !I.t9.iJIJ,\~¡¡;,,¡;¡;t': 3: ~%".\j\~:~~1'J7~.1~:;7'3;; fì!'~~~lÌ!'t.t,¡¡a~~ LëVèI of Service' ,,". 'À A" ,'" 'A' """ E E :""" .. . , a1Im!,!.cm. D;,êJ ~(~l~~_œ¡¡'J!!~....;:¡¡.~Jir~ ~'~!'(fi¡};;;t'j4 ~ 1\~1~;}!Zi:~~9, u ~h'ÍI Approech LOS A A E A eg¡ ri~m8O'"~~I~.\!;f1ß!i:R!~}.~,\\t\[tWÐ¡,,\:¡~,i.¥~\r,';!' HCM Average Control Deley 20.1 HCM Level of Service C 1;1~~~œl:lj.~_8.p J.è¡J~ïj !J!>~Lq~~~~~~Imi~'Miw.~¡~¡:¡¡¡ ActuatedCydeLength(s) 116.0 Sumoflosttlme(s) 5,0 !li_t[~~-pæ,¡J! R8..9!.!Y11¡IJW %~I ~'1ß:!1>JmWi~ I <:: 0$[ eyeIlð rtS~~~~îl~!,Ø~ c Critical Lane Group P :~ ~ . ',', .... M:\O2\O2282\Comp PI en ammendmentlSynchro12020 with Weyer Ex1..sy6 2/18104 Page 9 M:IO2\02282\Comp Plan emmendmantlSynchro12020 with Weyer Ex1..sy6 THETRALVl3-FF51 THETRALVl3-FF51 - - - ,- -- -- -- VIII" -- .. -- - .., .. .., .., .., .. ... '. ,., ~ . I. '. 'ø '. ,. '8 . ~ ,. ~ . . -. ,. .. a_... . - ('" ..- '\ t ~ ¡ 222: 5 320 51 &. 32 Av 5 .J 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeuaer Way Exlena\on Study 222: 5 320 51 &. 32 Av 5 ..f 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuaer Way Ex1enalon Study -, "): 1"" ..- ~ '\ t ~ \,. ¡ ;.I :!I ~ ..-...........1: ~ t:tS¡AI)!¡;XVt;Ui!~v:t I:UH¥~ 'r:¡B~B,n,~ff~ 1:!œm.~¡¡jl¡'II~~Ai.!I~~¡1<~-~\!,~J:!! LIne Group Flow ("'Pt\) 24O 1228 18 955 170 170 20 107 Qoeu, , 1'L¡,'enw.:.~'mJ.~, ,~""'~,;Z'O~,.,,Sð",,",'-mID,," '" 21l\!'1!:'f7, "",, ,1'1,,', ,,"'f2, 9"~,t,1,3'~,,'.f-'l,RT,"',"", ~~), ','";'~,;,'î,",'\';;',i',!',,x"f:'WL~,'~, ;",'.',"~,' Öüéue"LëñQtt\ 9Sîh"(tI}" 250"""160 "(~31"""'2âr' ~223'-'#205 h¿"à8 "'10Ó,"~",".j ,,? .,,;' :C.' 'C" ~2' 0~7;rn': ,~,~. '1"'\)',11W~5~")~~ ~ " ~ ~m¡ "'.r;~~mI'!' OOiiìÛpB~Tìñil;T%)-';"'M""';; ,';¿'gi,£iY!ilW""',,," """""\" ,'N'm,"";""".>"::,W!"""'~'~\....,, 1M. ~Æ,,~!tU![eJ(~ø~î?~t:~,~~~-~,~' '. &¡æ?,1!t;::;:'1??'.:~~1.~.w%::;~~t:;:¡iÑ¡¡::i~.f.~'J!-:$1 Tum BøyLengtt\ (tI) ,1OO 200 150 50 OOt!T>Bmt!I~,~"33,, ,%,;~,,; ~I',:~,,~R:"",",,"Q\,1¡¡t, ,~",'1~!L,',';'\, "','~,ãr~""">"'J""';"?"";,,,,,:~""~,.A~,,,,$;,',"Bt"',,",',~'-"'Jr.' ,~."~"",.,~,,,.",:'jÇ"'.',~,"~,',.,,IB.,,"',; 95tÍi-ê'8y ~ TIme %. 29% '" 23l~'-"--c' 28%" "28% '" 22'%'" #<""':46%-"" , ' ,=, " ,N 13. ~ ~~e.D..~~;~ S~Ë~~~~~~tp~~.~~ lm ~ ¡:¡¡m:y - ~~~rMfl'--'it_~¡¡!w:~).I')(;~~~!~_I:ì'IIl;I ~.~!mp~~1!~l&.1)i.!~!Cð ~ ds¡~p~~t5';.:q '\1.&.4" It1\.. 8 y'bll)!dgge f¡i¥~Åíl'¡.¡,1):Ì};}.>:,J¡$~ Queue It\own II maxImum after two cycles. , m. ~~1!\.~;.\~~~~ .!1~J ~&U ~i!!i~f6'I:~ö'pSl(" ~ig rìii r;ftí;~1J1\_~t*;'~íf~~ p,~~~grL1~"\','r~r:~i;':,!.I:U l;r;¡J:l~K...,,',,~L". ~"',i ¡,~ '~f;J'{"""~,::Jl." ,:\g r¡~NBK\¡~SI3~..lmt!:~ ~~e ~':.~~g~r~iO~;~m""!I";¡....'!'t~ -.oJ ;¿~ """'II'\-'4~.J .o'!-'", ,'" ~-, 10..,.. ' '-èBTF,ow(v'5'iplf... '.' ,__v"..1~J)OO ~--' ,"-~ ,"_v,.",._- ,__-o,1900"~1900..3'fÐOO,,>,~ L~~eVV';~:~ ~2 11 12 12 11 ~2 12 .~ 12 12 11 12 Gf¡¡d~~~~~IJ:':~:.'~~")""-~~ ' C%' .:."~' ':3"":;'f""'<f)).Ì:m;O-~Jtmm -c~a! Lc!tt'~e (s) 5,0 5,0 5 C 5,0 5 C 50 5,0 5,0 Ln..¡n!:'I;'FÍ!C'51',~~~t:t,QO",.o.g~;:~--':;,",,:;~,C:> : O!J~,:>~ :'~:':~~,9S 0 95\iF""":'l,(jO1t1'ii'f:Oq;,:',:<f~~ ~r:ib'-p~~¡:)'i~es' 1.00 1,OÒ" ~,:)o l.CO 1.CO Cgg' 1,00'" 1.00 "í;!5'fpë!!!j1¡e3"::~':'/¡:;: ',O.J~,~~:OO,;i~::' :'~',C'O '" 1 :b:>;..,..,"':~'~:OO,' -1,Cð":;'~f~:?I"?;;);()~~'iOO"~~ f't '1.00 0,99 l.~J' CO 1,00 J,95 1,00 0,92 . F'.r~)".,~-:-<"i,~,~;,O.!15'<:~.,.oo.:.,; ..-,:-¡""'o:¡rS::'1,CO:-;""::~O.95' o:n9"';:'~{::;:2Z0':g:l~:¡¡'¡OO",¡¡>t$NI S';:d':"1cw¡prë~¡"""" 17io"~925 - ", '~77: '~e2' '~693 'eco "'1755' 1852 ,'-' Fi~r,-.,~~.~,;~:.,-:~~'.o:9'~~7'.'~'-o:95" ': ~ .C-:>-"7"" :7,1:,95' O,~gXiÄ'<1(;¡')i;'P;g5~,0u::~:;~.~ SA!d.Flow(p@!'IT1) 1770 .825 177O '882 '693 'sea 1755 1652 V.oIu=!,e. (V?t\)~'W".,¡~-¡¡"'2.~t:\f.1;1.32.t.:!*cSß<'..,,.~.~ß cO< 935 ,-","r2:>;;-;¡' 223' , 57Vj);::r.ßO'~~~20,~~,.8.'!r~~~ Pe"k.~ourfec!or, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~,oo 1.00 ~,OO 1.00 1,CO 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 A~r l,F.I~w ~~':':""~.,.,:~;i:2~.J¡rÄlJ. 32~1::;,,'.~ ~ 7935';~~:!'i:S 5ì,~J¡J¡SO~(}&,¡¡;;~~,!5.~ L8~eGrouoFlow(vph) 2.0 1228 0 18 955 0 170 17:> 0 20 107 0 ~ro'.ë('~tl;,m~\~ß2JI!.'!,r-l~-¡;;~,;Jp,~,', ,:"~-:,' ";. ~'~O~~~~~:"";-~ :>"O~fO;8;¡~'¡1lðíI ;Jus eloc~ag"'s (1II1r) 0 2 0 C 2 0 2 o 2 2 o 2 7.Ury:1JT.r,.II~":t§!~II!IY{"",,¡<.t", er.o!t\'r<ijiiõ';ß:~.~~: ': f'rot ,,~,:!; .;,,>t""""'!'::~.Spl':,- ,- -'> '~?'f~~Spll.t~.(.. P~tec'.ed Phases 7 I, 3 8 5 5 6 ð P-er:-:-:':!~d'Phaši!I~iô!~;;':"¡~.4l«~I¡;<.t'~,;¡..;;. ',>';';: "':~77--...~~;~7;,..,.,..,,":,,:: ~~4~';¡~Nt'~~.~ Äci;;ìÙ~G';eeñ,G(a) '22,2 69.0' .. "is' 5ô.3" ,. . "~Ù' "'6'" . 8.9 8.9' , Ë :;.e~~V~}3 ~!22;~ ;~~.6i1 ,,~JÆ"': 1J*.~,3 ,'5:';:- 50 .:3~;, ~~~i:':!,~'(!",,' 'T~ :~h[~~;i~11}~,l~~~_~.YR~ Ac:u8Iedg/CRa!io 0.19 0.59 0,03 043 0.13 0,13 0,08 0,08 C,c e.r:n ~,ce lJ:;).8; (~)..:ì":; ':::~.:¡ ,p ;...1.5...u~;.t},,: 1¡~~' ;'( s:-cr:::,:', 5:cr:;:;- ;,}'-:,;;,;,I;, ~:-;-:::5: O\!:¡J,:E\~¡,¡f;;~;..U.i,~:!-1~~ Vc~ic!e Ex1ension (s) 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2,0 :'D~e:'Grp;C;~O.(Vphb'~~,3:!~M:28--Z0~""£~!tt53 .,:21 17~'.".~~.)',~'.:J~2)3',: :;2::>1b'ti!1J.'11'i#:ii;~t3~-t~1~ y',Re:loP,o: cO. 1. 0.25 O.O~ cO,2::> 0,10 cO,'1 0,01 cO.06 v!S.1;i!!~O"f:'.ørm'~~""'~'¡:"'!HJ~ 1:,,(;1-.:~~!!l,,;;ì..~ '1if:J, :,:' ; :~.~:~'7"',~;">i",'~ "3~~:".';':':!;;ml~{ø,~~;¡¡'¡¡~~~ vfe RI!iO 0.71 0.43 0.30 0,45 0,80 0.a5 0.15 0,8. U ~1': ~rr.,D. el e~ C.l:'.1 ~:I~.",,:43,; ¡¡.~!"'L ~."~"",1i.',~~~, ,.557:,:~n3:' :;":?:]';. ":..:. -g;:3 ;:,.' "9: ~~¡llit.~.~~B!i~\i:f,~i P:-ogress!on Fedor 0.e8 0.65 1,02 ',13 1,00 ',00 1.00 1.00 ~~è?!'.AI.D.CIrr-¡,; az~>'......o,~W¡¡q\~.M,1;ji(.¡¡'¡"r.J :C:-::";o, { ",..;,;':'.::.'<.;~ 7~:a;;':~5:6'~"itI'¡.{~o.i~~),\I',¡r~,*~ De'oy(s) '2.6 8.7 57,5 28,S S8.7 75,2 50.2 88,7 ~~1~e;I:.~;; ~.':....;;f&.¡:¡..;;:~:':.'~.,i:";:""~::,.' !.',: E:~':'C.~,..,.~~;~.¡~~,,:E:'. ,~E;~!;'i,.'?mif¡,Yd\i¡!mr~~ Aporoec~Deley(s) 14.2 27,3 70.~ i11f5]'Jmël':¡;O~""M"""""~"'\~~~. !J}.,. .",..,..,. ."'.."~""'C,..j",<""'-r.,~,,.-','.::",,«O¡.~ -"""",,' ',>' ",..' -. --, . ~"'~-".......'-" ,~',_~M',~, ,""'.'" ",',"'",<"""""""-...",, .' . 1i@!i!tðYþ'~iJ~.;t~~_,I~~lZ~ÇMltf.ê1.~IßI.[¡'§~Þ!!~~ HCM Volume 10 \,;epaclty 1'11110 0.61 P-1J1~g ¡Ç~~gL!g!m{ ~"~~IlliI~~ ~{¡ rr5!.~\f ~~t¡,u.mt(~ 1ìj" Intet'Sectlon CapacIty Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service pÌtt'Ç;f!!J~el¡ga,~lçIt g,up~~~~~¡tiiI~ .. M:\O2\O2282\Comp P1en ammendment\Synchro\2020 with Weyer ExUyß 2/16/04 Page 11 M:\02\O2282\Comp Plan ImmendmantlSynchro\2020 wltt\ Weyer Ex1..syß THETRAL VL3-FF51 THETRALVL3-FFS1 I ~ t1J Q Q Q Q ~ (I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ø ~ t8 <a ~ ta ~ . ~ ,.. ~ ~ ~ ~ '8' ~ ~ a .a' a -a .. .a ,. §-n 223: S 320 St & 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way Extension Wey~meeus~r Wey ExI~nslon Study 223: S 320 5t 8. 2020 WITH Weyemaeuser Way ExtensIon .e ,^St~ \)p..'f Weyeme~us~r Wey EXI~nslon stu<!y ...... ~i {" - ,,~ t t' \. ¡, ~" ..f - {" - ~ t ,t' \. L ;¡ PðOyemenl~ß~t:fm!!:I:IL\1I!;~ t:1:I.lmrt:t3K!J'!w,/I:II1/'11,INJ:jI¡¡'T;YVt3RfÆ N BU(~'5\f::l:Ilrn¡NI:IK',*!'il;l:I~1; 1:11';;1'.1::; I:iK Len~Configurstions 'm)1 :H't""), ",'",,"~ tt-¡. """, "~",,'-t,, ,r- ",~ t..r- f!,r<:\mtt~.¡j ,~~11~1gW~,1göOwrf g001>5 ~r ii': '1írOO 'iTi 1'9 öO~~~,O() §fJ <@ Lene Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 ~tim '(!r"~5'O.5~~5""'*"~5'O"""""""'-5'O" ""5'O"'-<"""':""""""'~"~ t~;:¡'Ùjìi:'F8cT~r' iJiiLJ' T'.ðÖ' Ó':§~"';,j'$\~;JJ'1,Ôb>'~,~1'y\,¡$~';!;~,~5: '().~5:~J:;i"&j'i¡'i;ôÓj':!Stòó"":';;rf.ö6 t;.!'f5B""d5.ë<r16 ~!! 8J~~~~jiO.q,t~0, é\J,Jr;Ç~?}i";: ';;; '1'~öO7§;,1;:0'O;;~~' ::W "1 ::0 CO, ~(f. 99\!~ 1': OO:¡1!f. OOJ'!,ç; 1;.09 Flpb, p~dlblkes 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f;"~.~1¡~i~\~~Ã/m1Jg~¡~P!l9 8E£øP~J¡;1;:-¡¡¡,':cot., O:~~~~1:\'!+rOO ' 'foOO' (¿,O'.,es 'ß?f;'OO;~"!"J;OO¡J<:.~ Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0,95 1,00 0.95 0,99 1,00 0,95 1.00 1.00 ¡;'~1!'¡E~'fð!)m'xFc~,7.ZPJIIi~'tP2;_Þ$'ib'1K1 J..6'ð';4S1,4';f!;~~1"~a " ..'1 75 5""¡\f5~'7X17,o.;mee3rJ{~ Fit Permitted 0.26 1.00 0,16 1.00 0,95 0,99 1,00 0,95 1.00 1.00 ~ñ'íìW%'è:r~1~~~~ö4' ,'.ila1:ï";;T"f'fI\Y':1ðea'" "'1155'"..f553<I11"ftl,,-{1 e~~ Volum~ (vph) 17 1057 136 259 759 31 126 95 253 175 115 86 Wj \M ~O~o ~":J,!'~J }P_O.J1fkTI2ÇJ;'W~1"j11()_%OQ ;:\§:1~OjJm~r. 00(,;';1',00 \~\!T°'O~'{Qo.\~J, ~ Adj. Flow (vph) 17 1057 138 259 759 31 126 95 253 175 115 as ~ !1~j;G fÓJ¡p'if! ~~l!yP I) ~JiA't¡¡'h9. :>Æ¡í£\¡*,p_~~:;"~~7;9þ~)(o~\t' p 7.\ ...' 15'f'1:'¡'~ 53}... 'i{j I :).!'c¡:;~ "1 .O;-t\~~ Conn. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 B!Iijt!~~1T1 rJ~,,1:a Q œ«l!!!"O¡¡¡~,!%O~~~~.O~~ 2' : . . ':1<..; O'{;;)'~~O ,¡¡..",'!<;:O'ø.J\~ 0 Tum Type pm+pt pm+pt Split pm+ov Split ' Perm ~~\~ 1_~~~~~~~;.'ìI¡'Ig:i'~.~~_,~[S-;;' ,,¿~k eUt~¡:rtf1'~.I.iI}~~~'æ P~rmltted Phl!s~s 2 6 8 ' 4 ~1i!!CI .Gr,~QJt.(J(~) a~~ÆK1.2\2a~$~*~.(\5~8?1i)'18.5;:e?Jr¡:!J'd~~I~!ÄH.':-;:11;1? 4:~'t1;3S~~ 1..~ '.1 ~, .~ EtrectlveGreen,g(s) 42.2 42.2 65.8 65,6 12.4 12.4 39,0 14.8 14.8 14.8 ~! e'!ltcv~ 1Th1 t~ ð m!'i~ gJ'Ji'+"!i. O;S~5H);~ 0 :r'm:' ~p-,~ J;1¡{O'. 3'4~ : 0 Ii a~ b¡, 3;:::': Q., 3 &ÎÏrønêei'ìñi,;(~tI¡¡~!t'þil¡"'ã:Ó':' "Š:Ô' """'5,0 """lfó..,m'""~=';6,â""6:Ó""'5:òø'~'5-:0 "5:0""5'.0 ~!/1 ¡ CI ~ '¡eX! ì!ìì S fðllr¡ml'œ'II/2¡ qf'l"-"Ì.l12, O'~I?¥ß!';M'\>!'~~;o 'f{;'¡:;1:tt.;¡;~~g~:}';2\O?; :'!~2; O'>1'$1':tot) ~~ 2. b A. '" ~2;O, Len~ Grp Cl!p (vph) 210 1743 508 2756 178 168 522 226 238 202 '?m@'tl8'oe¡:6J¡m_~\T:ITW, Q,Q.Wì¡:ç ,2 ~~'iW;;ji,êO.Tf2~'O¡:¡'Si%1;r.~~?Oð ':: CU:O S ')~'O¡n' 3[éO~~q¡~ v!s RetiO Perm 0,03 0,17 0,05 0.05 ~1!J(ô~S~;o- çL~<9~'~0 : ~j ;¡;¡: 0:29&4~:'!!~~ ()' i 6 O'~' j;O; 6 J Iß';;o;4'8~ q;y¡7. O:4~ Uniform Delay, d1 24.1 31.3 25,0 13.1 49.4 49,5 30.5 49.0 47.0 46.7 ~I'¿Ç Lð!! \~1!t~J~\lj~d\t~S!*~o;~~: 0: 5~~~1~oo.~'7i,r;oo;m1 ;oo~~ ~; gu ;ì'-;f,i1 ,\ P9.5!\¡JO. Increm~ntel D~ley, d2 0.1 2.1 0,3 0,2 3,9 3,8 _~~0.6 0.5 ~11!>,>(8)~~1¡¡!ij1E¡I¡¡1iS~!,9;O.m\!iJ9¡7mAj~~:¡;8'~\!,,:8,OA~~;m'!53:3::"'53:2¡!":;¡O;~!J : ' ' ~ leVelofServfce "À 'ï:¡ 'au "A .~... " 0 'DU"';¡;¡';:' .. ~'rt' . ti ~l?;!!!!!yj.{~¡.ø¡;-~I!,¡~;;t.'!1;WJ{Wíiiþ:J$¡¡,,\j'J',iE![~:n 3~;; ~pro~~LOS a A D ;r.- ~:~A--~ ~\U;I:I;f~WI ~1+~""'~J~.tNI:I ~~ I:IIØ" l:I~öl:ll4iW.~ 1:¡1¡¡~.;i ¡;¡~_jWl£\ô.'W;'iM ~e-~:3roup Flow (vph) 17 1195 259 790 107 114 253 175 115 86 ;:-~ - ~1i~~(!!J._1!I.~~'2~~~8;mf'3',~;;}Ti~f.ae~.'2~~~B; O"~"5 Length 95th (ft) m10 337 0 92 140 147 96 200 137 45 '=rr- :\f'U~~"",V;""'.ilO~"'^'T;~"""\~2"0"?'~~"'""'.?""""'~'1"~'~1I.Ino: !~:~ Ù¡)ëlock Im-¡'(%f""i."h""':";;'*"'w:Œ""}~"""^""'Û'::' ,! 0 ",!"t'!?:".\("*#j4".,'?~".,,.i\k'"'%."""""h""""'":: ;. ~ .!:':. ~é)~~~~JÍitt.:ztY:':F.', . '5?)~¡; Äi\r;, "~fì;I:" ~ j$",;j?')'J',~'? ,f,~~~~~.)WÐ 7..... !ley Length (ft) 200 400 300 s:'.'!"a~~%'l1\:<J~'m,'."?~I,;i"\~r-"'!!!:: ' , ~o~::;""'ë"~S':"¥'~'UTh-.~]!J~I¡iJl4¡¡1!':æç%.;:,;, 9~:~'ßa-rêiõëk Tìñiê-%~--'"""'""~"'""'(:>!""""""""" ,",-',0', '>;""~o' """.,,.,~, ,""""" """""e"""!",,,.. ç;:; ~(I'.~y ..!D..~.ty.ID'!!DJ~jjl~~,;~~~¡~~",:¿:J'è~;;;:¡i£;1íR~d~~¥.""'.\.¡.,t~:&!c', ([\I ~ IJ\.~ m !KY ~~"'M."!~~,"miI.~~~~~ø;.~~iW!ím~wiÌ!i!í)l¡mm~;¡¡ iT!;¿'Xq/!!m~¡{~t>~§!t\WJtêð..htll.II,,;~Ûe.üê:1 !;:frilllê'r:&fIl.by.,.üp!tre8rT1~lgn81:'. ::.$,i7l2¿';1~'tæ;f.';¡;:@'i)Wt_~ì1ß;." ., ~m ø>< m:i: e~ ~ ,.0' '0 - HCM Aversge Control Deley 23.7 HCM L~vel of S~rvfc~ ~~~;.t!a¡¡;,~ P..!t;J. tYI~E~J..ð~~tj{¡jjj~~ç)j}~~Jíß~ Ac:tuat~d Cycl~ Length (s) 118.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0- !Dl~í!e.Ë.uç O,¡'Ç,!lP.!'Ç! !Y.¡,1¡¡.QU; 8JI.Q.r:¡,~~¡¡¡.~r,~!J'!jm! Ç>PtlZð\! ~1î§!J!>e 1Y:1~ ¿¡£¡;'~~,~ c Critical Løn~ Group ~,i.. .' . ..... ,,- ,'! I'" M:\02\02282\Comp PI en emm~ndment\Syn~roI2020 with Weyer EXI..sy6 THEiRALVL3-FF51 2/16104 Pl!g~ 14 M:\O2\O2282\Comp PI en emmendmentlSync!1rol2020 with Weyer Ex1..sy6 2I1ð!04 Pege13 I r. THETRALVI.~FF51 -- - ,- ,- - '- '- "" '8' '. ..., '. ~. .., .. ... ... ... '. (. <ø I,. 'ø 'ø I. r. (II '. 'II '. '. I. '-. '~ ~ .~ ~ '4t a ~. t - .. ¡" - '\ l ~. ~ + 41/ 224: 5 320 51 & MililaŒ.,Rd 5 .,} 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeus"r Way Extension Study 224: S 320 St & MII!taŒ., Rd S .,} 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study - .. ¡" - '- '\ t ~ ~ + ,¡ !II 1)6"", IJU\.!"""""""'" B!m§t: !;!, ¡~!:!: !:<'\Y<. W B¡¡'úi..lY!:J~ 1)1 ~N t jl~1:Ifj ~m:;; ßf¡'\Œi~iJiIm!>B J;<~i¡i#i\i l.8neG~FIOW(vph) 103 1167 215 236 1079 127 123 77 202 260 150 !3!!.!!! ~~IM~A¡¡g~'tcÍ1'í\'!P" f,%~~11,~Z?m¡;Ji:1-~~,~'RÞ .~1_~.~'!¡~¡t~-'!(;j Queue Length 95th (1\) m130 156 4 253 250 76 149 « 209 267 73 ~75O'111¡~~79~4'27;;!"'~$¡~%t~"';~"'m~P2 7:03 ~'N.qzJ 5õtfiü~l'ïiÎã(%)""":iRdd"',R' """."""""",;"""¡',,,,.< ,¡¡"'""",@J,b..",,.""".- , moo,'.,~""æ~, ¡¡,~,," '~,"",);~-,;;::'",,~,>,;:~-,','w,'~' ,',","" ',¡'~"fi,.,",1f,.,~~,?,fi',,"'.,'f;.~,,'~~,",;,'i,i:"",'¥í,~,"\':!:;x,'"'~,4,~J~,',~,"--,,",,' /7,:, 'tum'eayLength(ñ) , 2ÓÔ~~""s.=t!;.;To "0,,,"3"""""""1'75""'" 100 .. ~ ~B ~~~øf",'!.I'&t~g.F~~}\"r_i~~~1¡1¡,~b:íi;w.~%êj 95thBâyèÎockT1me%. ""3%'" ,.. 21%""'11%""""""" '" 12% 22% ' , ~J1 J !lg~~ en !!m~~!1)Jb~íti'4W~1.1'%¡. ~U;tj~f~k.~~~~:; Zi:_A*~l'ir~'~~~!'iÎÆ MC1>'E1I'1'!~!1!~I\i1~¡!M!'i!¡\'m~'mEBL~1; BJ;Ø.',!i!:!: I:<$~Y'I B~"I'\~VV:j RmNB~~ BR!JfÂ~SB fZj¡t:I:,::i B r~.t; Bß In! ~,¡¡¡;:;¡¡m m aoc.-f~~!,l~:@;~'¡;~~q¡\m§~It~',jiì!",\",ÿ;!m~tr~þ:m¡q~\J1 m~VôlU1i'f6l@!Ã9.5Jp'~tll.ell¡ti èti&.:ls¡J:ij~t~:[!J~.!b}l¡;(j p sttê8mjs I en aliij c' :: ¡r~I.'43j¡E¥--;jjB":ß:;;~:;;;~~ Lane Configurations ,-,-!'Ittt, ,I' ,'I Hi- '1'1, t t' 'I t t' Ië"""""""""""',~, ~' ¡-~,,' ,'gèi¡:;"J'!I!>'~""i\"'""'"1",,,^-,, ',"'I'v'(°_-, ....,""""""",',,',\"'^"', 1"'oo'-'.r_'1'-9'Oö""¡F,""""_-,~"","""""!\.p"""'" .'!.~":'JH~i' ...~~...I. ., ;, 1',_~,o~.=j¡¡ç'l¡~~¿;';:""-N';:"1"vv:';!}",,VU!.;t.,"'-N "~ ;;;;'~'~"!"'-N;,,'~':'tN\,/,!.,,1..~ Lane WIdth 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 rÞfa.[J:::o.~!:m'ffèJI~~~J'm;9J:t.t5;~'i;.ff1!5:tJ?<!nr\!j~~";¡'tj;Y75:0:.' "'5,O'-;;~;~',5;O3ë:5;O..~j,.;"'[5:-cJ;;,3WÆ¡ LaneUtII, Factor 1,000,91 1,001,000,91 0,971.001,00 1.001.00 1.00 ~l~~;~;.~"'I';[X)~!OO.! OO%~ \0~;,l@[0I~~~1![1IOO -' 't 00 jyf;OO~';Odj~J:è'1)'~~9~~ Flpb, pedlblkes 1,00 :.CO HJ 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~_'J'.::,,;. " 1:0::; .:.!,1.t'<J!r:a:e ~:r;0'();;!~¡'Ö:9;~¡;~:!\1¡0(); 1.öe':,V'!'P:à5~1~':~.:;;W!i~ Fit Protected C.95 1.C:> :.00 0,95 1,00 0,95 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 ~@f~ÇE(tm;;5J)¡' :. ; ~;:f 1;: ~5 ~~~ 9.:5~Sg:¡j~£t:.~iÞ;ß~~è5,~~~;' . .'1 Sð3W115 S3¡J.~,mo:~-eð~~~ FIt Permitted 0,95 1,CO 1,CO 0,95 1.00 0,95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.00 1.w Sã1tmF'lòì¥il'øermr'"'"'. '0" 175~~5~31!it770")1!'r.(ee5"ir;gTi~:¡:t3'3" "1 M3~1",{f 5S37:!('r710i\,'ll!~ Volume (vph) 103 1 167 2~5 236 772 307 127 123 77 202 280 150 e., ~~¡r¡¡pP,~~ :tJO';~J;otr.;;{.f.¡OO~-qo O~t'OO>/ ~ 11 00' "i~1(a(¡~:roo~, ;~!.\.:m~ Adj. Flow (vph) 103 1167 215 236 772 307 127 123 77 202 280 150 ~;~ ~}!,~.1 C3!~"'~2~ &2p~'¡iTcja,Tg~~O.&.127:¡;.:';~123!,ê{¡"rill'~~~~I.!~:>:'W;¡ Confi.Peds.(lIlhr) 4 1:> 10 3 3 3 BOijBI~ a gð al{r~~Z~ ~ ,'t ¡; ~¡:;:~.. ~j!;~1~"r;¡¡¡j\~i.'iJ~¡¡"~r,{:' :i?ê*a?i~~ aliJ:t'l\~O1§'): p~~:z Tum Type Pre: Per":' Prot Prot Perm Pro! Perm ~t6!l!'é!.~fltt8~"li> 'Z~~5 ::-'..1"',:, Z ,:'[.:..; : ë':!.;~j¡¡1>f;iJ(1@;;~'t~~\þ~!j¡3'{'i,,:ffce~fI!:it~~;h'~'~\~f!~"(!!I Permitted Phases 2 8 4 ~!\1è}~~~~I)i'j.\; (8"'~~6.2 !.,,:~e:2:1;';:;1g:e":56i2§;~t';JYJi\';8:¡r . '11:7:~:i11~7;'?BJ:e:5'§:~~ffi~ Effective Green, g (s) '0.6 45.2 A52 20.6 56.2 9.0 12,7 12,7 16.5 20,2 20.2 ~!êËlö{g¡8~1W ~ ~ :0; C ~~ l O.ro: A O:i':¡ZÞ:'~;':J;;ÞZ {e};1~;~ti'$'.{(t QS ,'a" ,1. ,:;§ p,~ J);fD !!~ O:t~~; Clearance Time (S) 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6,0 6,0 .6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0' !I'..ðf11çleìÉXIen!!fOI):, ~) ',.~,~ '2,O".,,""Z.O \}",..2,O,,)¡'1.$j2¡DB~J112,O:¡;f~!¡¡ø¡I!t~'lt::2¡Ok";;:¡':!!Ö'f~'27<».m::0'R2~ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 160 1958 630 314 2260 266 204 173 252 324 288 !>l!l~,~q~j£:~~n~,~ ~ O:~6 .(,.CO,Z4.. i. ::!i~CO;:~~~'3~~aijr~o:~<tjt.,.;':O;9~lt:\\;~:t¡1~Sji'_41'.~ vIs Ratio Perm O. ~A 0.05 0.10 ÏI~1f~i:f!'~'7>.' :J;~£".Z6or,.,..P;3~":':~0;75... 0:4a"è;:,;.tr'~ù.~a:. . 0,60.7: OA5 ..\:\1):80'~0,8~:O~ Uniform Deley, d1 50,9 27.5 24,3 45,3 20,1 51.2 49,2 A8A A8.2 A8,O 43.8 1?¡j5õï;6ss1Õl)if.¡¡èfö~11\;'~1.q;~;omp~:C!7.;,i?k;f:qO . 1,00 .:'::;i¡:;~f;OO:.1.,OO'¡r1.0p:,;rO:S9œ.;ou.:"'~ti~ Incremental Delay. d2 5.2 1,1 1,2 6,7 0,7 0.5 3.4 0,7 13.7 11,0 1.2 PJ!1ã.ÿJi1;'~~5;~~J~.;§~2~5'r:O.,~; . 20::a::§¡3§:C;1\!j;5m;':52;7.;:r4~:0"~5e:~52~~;q Level of Service 0 BAD COO 0 E 0 C ~~Þ3í!ÌlY:,OO~~~:;;%';¡¡:%¥!;"i 2 6;7b~~;;.,~i"';' 51~4 ;;;:%¡;;~è;f' ~'E. 9. "U=I':~ Approach LOS 8 C D D lOt eQO C1\OJÆ~ m ~~i&~MIIè~~l!;~~:¡1M,~?!ti.\\Wf.111í~I;¡'I\~~~ HCM Average Control Oeley 27.5 HCM Level of Service Cti: BC'f;W~'¡¡¡¡¡ 8'01 'ì'au6 '.'.o:!,.g&.~~':~~"'$'.,." ,..,' " Ô;::~C'1;\~"Œ\o¡¡,; ",' ' Âêíúã~;¿C~e~en~th'(~",~"~,,1,",.,~,',:,'0,"""""..".,"', S,.,.".,~.',S~,";',,',",'~,I,O,S,'",.",ttlm, ',e",(,S).""':.,', , .,',",.,',~,.,',:.,,"'.',.",,.,,',.,,1,,5,:0',""...",', " ". .."~, .1. !!Wl!f!~tIO.bÅ~ap~J!YJ.U..tI!!Zã,jl6..m'ØjS¡¡¡l~~.:ZJC1J~yel,¡;rtS~~':':,'i'i.J~;r,;C".~ ., ""~ ' c Crttlcal Lane Group m - J :':... ~ ~ ;gm ø>< m:C þ~ 0 M:\02\O2282\Comp Plan ammendment\Synchrol2020 with Weyer Ext...~ 2/16/04 Page 15 M:\02\02282\Comp Plen emmf!ndmant\SynchroI2020 with Weyer Ext..s~ THETAALVl.3-FF51 THETRAL VL3-FF51 ,,'ý 2/1 ðIO4 ! Page 18 '1r,- -- #, r '~~QQq~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..~ 234: S 312 St &. 32 Av S 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyerhaeu!er Way Ex\en~lon Study ~.r.;;~. fig. ~~;;~~"F~~.~7f"?""'.'""""....... ~.~<m'..'F'...rt."¡:'.'.'.'r:;fð'p'~t"",.\~;\'7~;""""~~i\'}~"""...'j"'.'.":,,""~~'~~:<"!1'1i'<* ".,.;.,_.,..,;.,..' U..,.."" """,.,;"'!."'~/";.,""p,,,...', . "..."'.,;.'"'O:'._";""."'k.'.'4'..,.:'",,,,~d~_. '....- ~'"' GNU" 0% 2% 0% £. ~:.u,~\'\!!¥!) :;';ii.~~ 1a~21, e:!if1i\ 1~~ æ..~1'2~~"i:~;S4Œ;~~~f~iJ.?¡; l~~}i~;~~~~t!î;~_1 PeekHO<IrFBClor' 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0C 1,CO 1,OC ~owrata'tQ.e!'iII\};1\t zi'--'1"""1z1"~/1-""t""""""""-""""""""""""""!I""I"~'~íJ':ooì~~~1§; Pë(ie!t1¡;ñ;-~iI'~"':"\f;;¡¡,¡",.."Q.....\.,~t,.:". ¡,¡¡.w.:\Öp,', 'fõi.\"{'i!«V{:V~',\W\:";:X,~<¡,M..';¡: "";-r.,."",, '.",; ',h il.1k\', ~~~m~~~ :g;æÆ~:::m~f~~j.. ¡§r:?1¡~lii1¡¡~ì.¡",¡~}f~~t~~ä!1;tØ£\.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡ ~.!O !m~lt'&,;.i'¿t~?,t¥kt~~7~JJJi¡".WJ:"'-1TIri1~~!¥~i~;¡~f~?;øø.~¡,~it~$¡_fB RlQllt turn flare (Villi) , 1[~.a~~~~+,ETr~~~'r\'YU!~i11í~:\M;'~~~;z"ßAtrj~~1;t¡¡~æJ~¡'l~~ Me<1len stont<¡e veil) 1 ' ¡;¡~m~~ 5 i1"~--~ ~~¡g;~~ìf~~.~ pX. platoon unblOdtlld ~mom1.ø~~."t1!~,,~";!2 a ";."(rll~:, ""'~~~I'~.~ "",.., ,.. ,. "¡!MM'R~i!\<!\.~~m"'""..,....",;~"..,"'{¡¥1....iI;I<"...Iii".",. .w.... . .... :Ii .......1. It age 1 eon! vol 396, \ìc At ~) ~ g a ~~ ~~.!l.~:~:r; ~ ~,~' <>JIi...,', . '¡~g,!:"g"1\" 1,,' '~'Â" ,.'!§í!t' %i,!!J\'.~'.1't.¡wl""¡,¡"""þ ".."¡f¡"li',,~ ~U~~blo.:~ed .,ci-'. :.",.,j:..:.""~..,,, ôO~ "",.",. --'85'4.r"':ì~9""~" 't.."""'",, "'..., ,."AI',';!!; "...<.'"Hh."", ,'!I,,1. 11'"t'mi'JIOi¡~~/,~:",~~-.g.:,"W,(¡l"':';:~)¡"'i ,,;,; ð '8 ';'~fe 9")':~>7';',.',,:,,"')wt::-:>!'!If!~'¡ì'1'N!-~:\<'/i::r: ¡-a~~\'¡¡;Ôe (I) . ,Ill: '";;,},..,:'<"h"'..,,,¡'¡,,"'.',J, "le"'w;" ..,.,.t\~,.'","I<!!"""."",;¡~;<¡;¡(.--w¡r--,¡,,/",. m}'¡ø¡S.,1¡!æ}!.I~~1)~¡flffi~w.i;;7~ikti.~:.z~~ :'¿J3.(S;¡¡ì3\~;~lJ35¡_¡).j~.__¡$f*2JJ~F;:1 pO queue fr&e % ' 88 ~9 69 ~ ~ ~ BJiID) ;r~~~~I"Ø~@1;m-t71~~¡iÍ\~iJ~~~¡:~~'MfB 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon WeyemaeuIer Way Exlanllon Study -.. 't l' - ~ r ""\ t ¡ MOW m en ~~~f:S ,I ~:c.t1~Y{è! ~Y\'èI, L!:rn'N B !4~,N i:R1ß~~1fJ:~~Æ'~'im~lIim.Jl'Jm'A.'>í!:~ [i'!! BJ)I ~IJ~ m DlYJI!W_~~~~~~~J¡.'tIlmi\'ei\¡<¡;i"MI¡..~~~V; -~ ~tJJi Þ:~~J1~ lì[Q1~'ßf~!:d~~ìi!Þl~4l!~I.J,eEin aYib.~1 ~dQ~.(4fu_~i;.;.j!ìi¡" ,jt',;)~,~~ Queue shown II maximum 81Ier two cydel, l;j:eO\'~LlI~,1"'¡:"'~H:~,,( !:l,', ...'oJ;::> ,2.i1r~a;: ~':\Y8:2} ',:<3 :¡;::¡ f'5U~t'!¡¡¡}~\'j~¡.¡m¡¡¡,~fÆ-¡w:¡r¡.'1J.rM_w:mf~!I ~.~~!!~~r.it~1,a,5,t~f30~,>!""":12.1~~r.;2oe ;",'2Cß'~>-.~:~~21~.1:¡.'f~ Volum.Le~ Û Û 121 ~ :¡ '9~ 0 ~~~~~~it".; ,;d.i:u" r..:, C ~;'Zf6~~a 'to ,."". ~':,~""'7":':~2:.I¡¡l1'i"""i~i&'t\~~,~~~,*,{f¡, cS,,"" -, - 'ï':iÒO"':7::;' ':Ó¿g"'{?':io ":'7':>~'" ~9'1- 719 ."""'" '.', .. ".. V.?¡:~e.;.:;"~~- ~;Y¡il~,!f:?:~:~. g::IT'q'2.ro~~, 2-: ":;:12:;;:'0 5:-!~~;~IJ¡~f~~i~ QueueLBr'~~~(~) ::; 0 10 !) () S9 33 ¡;.~~~t9!LèZr~¡1iì'.'è;ì'"{.,,¡;,~~:~-;:: '" ~.\!. 1,\';>",..:r:,":', ':>,c':".:"23Iaj;£¡)iÌ;1~£'t-kh\tw_'\\I!f.._j~-t.1;d¡¡iì¡¡i..j UI:'Ie LOS ... C B N>P 1:"~~~~í ~ ì':"i-l!:;~:t'J, C??:7Ç~7..7, ' :'~: ~ 7;~~f>¡:t(~)~t!X~'¡¡\?c~íi<i%1i¡~~~?£'lî)(j~ ~~~~S C' 2282\Comp Plan ammendmanllSITlCllro\2020 with Weyer Ext,,!~ 2118/04 Page 17 M:I02102282\Comp Plan ammendmantlSyncllro\2020 willi Weyer Ext"s~ THETRAlVt.3-FF51 -om ::t»< G)::r: mffi ~~ , . ,...' '-J ' -:ï1 ,..... 711 Pe0618 111.\ ~ rn lilY ~}~~~Jii~Ml"J;¡j'~.!':Ai~t'>!M ~~m"¡,m~~1I'æi\:JWl'il~Wkl1"1'.'~!!!.!!mmtID"M}),¡ Awrøge Delay 5,8 L@!'Æ ~,è,l,er;l¡~l ~Ð;Ç!.r)l,¡.;Jm.. f¡¡ I ~~-m'i~5] g"~-;¡~:'J ~C¡;r..è\ì~1' S'e1'V~'\i:~~?i{': ¡2'~:}mŒ'ÀJ¡¿15~~$1t8~' ~m 5><' m:i: - ,,' - ,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..~~~~..~~a.~ 497: 5 312 5t & Military Rd S 2020 WITH Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuser Way Ex1enslon Study ..) ~ .., ... I + ~ ~ va rn ell t ~tmI!<t:: ~1!\1.t::1:$ K~ Nl:$l)¡!'I1; N tiJ\!¡t~::;I:$..I.f!;lIi¡:$tj K~~W~~&%\lß¡~~1!,~"Vi!!:1.mw¡¡ lII~e ConfiçurB~e"s '\ r' 'It ¡. L;~~r.~M~ ;:.i).f.'i:~ i;:'~;'::!_S:r:. ,T"'~'~ 9-,o~JjQg1E:\~ÖÖ~g~"ŒjjriJ}-í$,~~;':I'~J:¡;"J~!a\vrJ~~¥~'í.1.:¡1*¡~ iotal Lost ~r:'Ie (s) 5,:) 50 5,0 5.0 5,0 F~. ~.!~Y;!J ;¡ F.. ~xr.::¡:ii:': ill:. ;.~ i. . C 0 ~.~ : ~::rO'Z~,:::Qqo;i¡j~T.1¿ÖÖ~!;:J\\J_~~ti.iì:~¿>ii.¡{&1'i,\¡;¡'1:tl;¡~¡:il'\iØ1& Ff:)tI, p~/':>i~es ~ .00 C 92 l.C~ 1.00 0,99 "'~'.ec~'esn", ..':'; "". :1"~""-OC"~1-""'~'7":'Oð".mr.:1"'O~n'Wf\!';'.""'!,ei:!r','ti;;~~",t""~,WßI¡¡_k"'~""1'1m~:: ';i". '~._-."'-.,-.,>Ö:!"""'" ,....,- ", .." ,,". .--....'i. ,;","",. ",j,^"""",("¿"i,!!"""",~">,"""',A.*',".",%';¡¡:",,,, ,m.m, ",'W,.'" ,.,." Frt . .C~ :;.~5 . ,OC , ,00 0,96 Eù,~-:~~ ec ..,..-,::--';,ìí: :i~ " Q~9 5 :";~-1: 00, ::f::~ 5'.I71;qqm1:;'OO~¡'¡:~%~JJN1i~+t:i!~"m;¡~lfã¡iIJ1111r~lî§~I,BW§¡~~ Se~~.Flow(D'~:) ~7~5 ~.!.() ~770 '848 1746 mv;-C:Yi~/:;¿""':;;¡7 ~; ~ ~ ~~.:)¿~;~ ì~~~;¡¡¡ii~~::\f;m:~g!,~~~á~~'EI~~j(~t~'lf~ì-tßj¡;¡~~\W(~!f:¡~ï.ik"itìQ¡ y"Qlg~;{'y';l') ~!!\:'~':I'il3CJ~~-;-¡ 2C 1.:: ~:;2Ð2,'-~ ;.~5;31i!'i1:,~~,1jt{~!24,1!.t'"f.fj,*,*~~.í¡.~!)B!!,l:t;* Pe!~-hour !ec!or, PI-'!' 1.0:> ~ .ce ~ ,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 ~ ;!:,I,~l'9D if(üJi'..;;',~ ii. ;¡C~~ =.', i'~:!. 29 2. '.;~ ¿5~:;¡~9_i24;1*iÞ.j~~'~!ri'¥;&""!t~.W!,¡¡rn¡¡@ß"i!iiS._E,* Lene Grouo Flow (vp~) XC 2J~ 292 353 732 0 ~.ro.~.æ.~~¡'¡::21)~l~;;";' ~;.o~~. ~..; O~!,:-,,~,O;:;).,-q~1p~~%IPi\¥r~<t<~>l~~4;\[\\RítWJ!j,_~;rl;!¡ Bus B'OCJ<eçes (t!~"r) 2 2 0 2 2 0 . j.!-~.T~.~~¡i'!¡i.jjo,iv.'š.'.,.:t:." ~~ "~ F'~":ëI. '; :-:"~~;>,¡tthiif~(t')~í~W;;g¡¡,J!j_¥¡¡t¡q,*i¡t~'t"!?:~f~&Ji,"t?,"<I¡il"J!f:,<jw!i!~~I"~¡g,: Pl"".!~ed P~8Ses 4 2 6 P.. ~~~ se ~ ;;"~>Jii;; ~'.r.7'-::::~~ :'~,4'~1~17:'~:E~';7Dr~,;'E&?&;",ê¡'~:r:~\Ji;:iJj;B~~";¡;'.ÞJ&~,~~~S'$F?tii AC:U!!ed Gree~. G (sj 22.J 22 :J 84.0 84,0 84,0 ;;:!Ç"~X'~~C¡. ".e(1.{w: ¡sJ ~22 :0.";; 22:: . :".:~:O!.": s:j'.'þ:;,;:'r~;qJ%V:A~¡¡¡'B.ß~tt?¡;~j.~~_'!1ì.¡j Ac!ua!edo!::~a:¡o J.'9 0.'9 :;,72 0,72 0,72 ~_~f807~~:o;¡.'7!.~¡ (S) !;:,ë!,,! ,~I.~. 0 "-;0;;': S:q" ~.~:5:07;:">,5;O;;:~;;¡5JO;>¡'IJ~~~~i!m~¡-~.;¡'~¥!f&i~1it~r;1~;lilt% Vehlc!e Ex".e~slon (sl 2.C 2.0 2,:) 2,0 2,0 ' lftt~.G.r¡),~C!JP;í'!'P~) :¡ç;;!;>11 333:' t'; 275. "'".;4' 7:,':}338?dJ26:4tt?,~tt;f¡(~tM~~;;'.i~1fi~;jí!¡;j¡~¡¡1i1j¡~it(%~j!ì!!~~,~.I'fÆ,',i:j¡'::' y!sRe!!oProt eOF 0,19 0.42 V~I~a:;~_t:!:;::\i.ç;:;¡'.i....,{::'4::~"':::J,~ 4 '; Y/e Ra"o 0.9:; :),73 ~~. 0, e;~ 1'..a.1.:i':'~~('oQJr: .t 5: g ~,;:.u, 2 -"!~O: c "?!5:5;i;.};7;a)¡;"ì~-:;';;:&qrxr~~'f~~#;~'ìmQ~~~;~~#ø-$. P:'Ogreulo~F8C'.O<' 1.ec ~.OJ 0.82 ~,78 1,00 ~!t(:f!!'~~'~ I::~;}". :'5; :;':;:~}~i~~¥âk!i!,¡~~jj,i'li:F¡';\~¡;~~*}i~D?Jl.ilf&'K${i".fij~%¡~M\~jj ~~.~.O.lÌo\.'Jft;¡; :>~ êt. E?7:;~ ::-':;r.~.~':,~iTh~R,1'â~[A~;i:,,~):,L;;!!!Ø!i,?j,:"\i,'X:Ii(i5Ii:~;ÎI:&t~¡:>¡Rit6:~~\Kil1i]¡¡¡¡1@i\,;;7~ Approac.~ Derey Cs) 63.9 9,9 9.5 ~P.!?"!. ~í,.u. ::;.r.:~~1'<';;""'~ E ~~ ~m~E;¡¡!g~.AJi[~q,1.i'[¡;:;~~~mœ.ßi~~~~1,!í~~i;:¡~ -om 'ß~ rnffi _:4 \7-1\ m (eø eçuoCT,.,1>!III1 m 8IY mfiII.t Rì!W. ~~~ò1I!;1'¡n.1.\\j ~~ ~~m'i¡<!<¡-¡;',(ii\'!jI,'m\1ílWIIII-M~II¡¡¡¡ Ii ~ ~:a ~~i~~~2 ~'!:1. ~f¡; I:i c Mj..t':~'(é.l;bf1 $. tItVJ. ~.r!!t."'ìil:C;~I~__àj HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.7-4 ~atð!1i~P-llte.!1ØJ!ii.~_»!~:¡lì:~~~I~,!f¡~,I&íi~,S'lì1J'iI9l[q:sJ;!1ì11:~1(!).1\¡æ,~~~,f:tQ¡q&~Ïi&1í'!iim,1,:~_'í Interseclion Capedty.Utilization 86.2% ICU Level of Service D ~1)!!Çð. r l¡¡M!..~.J);.i.!iì..lh f~!Ä~~~~\WÃ¡m.ì);f:r£i'f!o~;T~~~t~,~;~k'.'¡j];i¡';i~1j¡jj';lilRI~~vt1;;~1iÌ1!R1.f¡~\ìt1j~§¡¡ ;g m' C»< m:.t: ~'ti"o22e2\COmp Plen emmendmentlSynehro\2020 with Weyer Ex\',sy6 , ~~L~~FF51 0 ~ 2/16/04 Page 19 --" , "t i . . lc r 'Q vI r¿ tl (II (II tl tll rð t/ ~A ¡II 'ø 'ø rø fJJ ~ r. r~ 'ìJ (. r. r. ~.. ~ ra a 3 ~ .. -. a ~ ~' a ~. a 4i a..... -i, - f ..- 4.... ~ t ~ ¡ 135:S312St&28AvS .J;, 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyethaeus"r Way Exlenolon Study 135: S 312 51 & 28 Av 5 .J; 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeuser Way Extension Study - " f - 4.... ~ t ¡Þ" '.. ¡ .¡ L'!!-.1 _.-..up_¡¡.~t;!3,~a~~ms.r~~~~~BJÆlre'ill.~~:¡¡{,,'fJEj 1!11 ~ IT! a~.1!'iOOi\ \W! !~,m~1\m1!ii~,';;!11;W~mH!Wfi~"");n~W~'IDI'\ì!i\!fim.f~mmm¡nHf~¡;¡~ MO ~('I'\OO t'~.1%\E!;:.I:J L¡E~J:: BJ?1!J EB ~ttr,W8I.'!~V'{BT4;¡¡jW8R,:>l~ NB u~ N B1;\;11' NB R i';ItI\S B!.'lliii S I:! I ,ffi~1:ì B fi Lane Con~g~ations ¡œ. gJ~.",..".,..""J,.""J."."..k""ö'\ '1" '1+.",.."""""" ",J~.............,;, ~1õ\Y:(vp~þlr~¡¡}"vJ '\^HJ4ì,~v:',j;¡I.~¡("".~w,1~vv'§ôl.,~f"~I~ 0 . ~oo, .'~W"J~wÄ.c:",\",^,¡:"",~, ~.re\lV¡~~~ 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 G:=-sëe~~) ,~ :' i;~g4}1tt:"~);'1S~ì~rt.4,~:~~¡~;~)1j'ì¡f;Ji;"n'2'W:~:ffi~;:~:'""1'%'<,;T"':"'Tr~':,!;2:7:'\I'A:\~,~ 70tal Los: I'..", (s) 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 ~ J ~:I '7 F !I:'?: t~~mr.q1~:t:H9q ~i'$!;¡m1~:f:og;';¡; 1.:0 ~i[1W0)iI¡f.° 0;; "1. 00' ('1.\f7:~:;t*\1:1';Om-~: ÖO,i¡,7r;.~i1 "rpb, p~d!!):~"s 1.00 ,1.00 1,00 1,00 0,96 1,00 0,99 1,00 0.98 fP'J 7" P ffil ~ 'i1ë! Yi:~'m~~,PlI1.9j,'{tl\P'~~~1Q:¡\'ITa:-gg]11N1;O~O'CS:[G1)7'Tr, OO,?:~1,., "è1~~'f<O ,9 9;~~~~ Fr. 1.00 0.98 1,00 1.00 0.85 1,00 0,93 1.00 0.92 !":! P:'O! IX: !-'~~JF$í~ o,~ ~A.~k.1 ¡ go:\\iMI'1$~1j¡:¡';1Y;9 '5 "?!:¡J:O'ö~'I"ITO° ~¡7CJ:'g~1':;' ',\ r:oo71;~) >i~~ o:g-~ .00 ""j!;]¡(À~ s..:~. F~ow(p~;) .. ,- 1721 1723' ". '1738"'1783"1510 "1751' 1641' ,. "'1746' '1å2i~' , ':. ~T:ë i'Til' ~ë d::~ ~.~.o]!l ~'\ìP~~~ 0':4'2 "i; 1:0 b ~~g; ~;oo¡~:o ;13 '~ ' ~ I; 00 ~;:iY:';;; 7,.:¿o;6!fi8:r: OO:~, i.~ S9:~. FlOW (0""'") 746 1723 759 1783 1510 429 1541 1240 1ð24 Vo' u r:-. A ..(v;: h) ~ ~~'-"'J2.9.~~.9,~~;5.7.*~1:1,O~'I:H}~:1-4. 9Sj~i~:43,S-;¡m~v,;r~¡'i65,',i'¡;\f,:83 j<ff'-1t.t23~~260_,2~.9; :>"9k-~ou'!aclor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 -: Z;~: ~r6¡;';1 \':) ~ Y ~A~~~Zt¡~~~H:~!IJB'Æ~~1:0~:;;;'E¥. 9 ;;ii.{C:)~¡;;~3!i . Íi'8 5 .~~~~ ~:m!tj¡ 2,~.œ.n 2 ßi:!.~ Le~"G!'OupF!ow(vph) 292 448 o 104 449 43 53 128 0 23 529 0 Cõ!\ ~7 P!~ ~ ~~'j¡I.$,~,\'W,'Qm.~N; 1 o~p1: ~'frn~10 .~_I 0 .,110 '~;W;1 0 ;;¡i~fO~~1~ 7um 7v-..e Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm ~ ~ :~: ~ ~ : ~!~JiIl~~~&œ$~ì!~:~i!'llflß¡Ji~ìi~'&~~¡; ~"L1~¡¡:~~~¡¡~;;i;:q;;¡;; 2:;~J ;£:;;;1),; ';\:;¡¡'~.t1lL ~~ .A.!~¡; eTê:m ~ nj1£,?i~I)J$¡I'i;'2,~..~ft!¡,tJ¡m;_2'2\1!~22;a~~22i ß3Qg~I.1!i g; },,:18~9;i)~;m.;;t'j¡¡11.1e:~, ..B.i:.~f~ :::~ec~'ve G..,,~, 9 (s) 23,6 23,6 23.6 23,6 23,6 17,9 17,9 17.9 , 17,9 ~i~ ~è ã~g7:.:R ãti!'1if'..~ {f'.!t~.z.Q r4,6R~Q";'f8'~ïO;{e;'f1:o~e~0):!!!.Tf". 0 ,:! 5','F.r..;,~':?31¡~ ~11:!~~~ ::;:ee"l'.nce 71.."e (s) 6.0 6,0 6,0 6,0 8,0 6.0 8,0 6.0 6,0 \~ ITX'. e , s I ~ o:'{ $ )~¡¡¡:Z¡Oß~R;l; 0 ~!>7.JW!Ø¡~!ß11mzCO,.~ 2m;¡m::'2~O~:;q:.:Z;O:::;~~,~~~ La~a Grp Cap (vph) 342 790 348 817 892 149 570 431 584 w~ F;! a ~ ,0; "'. ~" ,~i&d~l~ßtl'ì(ìt~¡f:;'ÎÌ!m.¡~kii~þ12:~;{~~~~~~ZiiO".O Sf;" 1ß~~;U~4ì't11~~.@r:~~ vIs Rallo Perm cO.39 0,14 0.03 0.12 0,02 ~~.tL6~1$:$!t'i1iRi~&.çß!.?J¡{~ qi!5~e:~~¡;;O~;12Eq¡ 5:!5,})~f.oJ !'.emo&~";:.;o:z 2;;%J:~m: 0: ~~ ,~t'ì';!~ Un~orm Delay, d1 12.4 10.2 8,8 10.1 7,8 12.5 11,9 11.2 16,3 ~ ~~ I§I!@¡ èr~g_"lág:(liiíI"~'1M'fiop:~,,'ftP ~ !E.~Om1!OO-¡'î':1 ; OO~~~O ~~~~ IncrementaID"lay,d2 17.7 0,6 0,2 0.4 0,0 0.5 0,1 0,0 23.1 R!.~Yi(!~~:J:O:fjl~¡~\1I¡¡7~~#:$ 8 ;9\\71 0;!51j'V!~~¡gm13:0-:'.12:07r;::;;ÞF,¡~U~2~39;':!Bm Level of Service C a A B A a B B D ----~!cll¡~'~~~m. .~';;'M"JO':o",,~_,~~D;'12:3'~f¡¡~J;'i"';~~ ~~~;-[ð-¡L~';\~". 'jt;"1Ø. .m, a"'" ""'~""""'*""B~"'~" ",!Ií.."".. B""""T't""""""'~'Ub-'>4.~ .p-~~":)\pFlow(vph) 292 4-46 104 449 43 53 128 23 529 :~~ ~! .~ !\Qgt¡\~~~~100~1Ë,'~2'1'2NtrO{':""" :'., 0~~"~'14; i""'i'[1ð':i;r:tr¡:.':5~.~B~1f..:';;ki't.~~f~¡(11:'è'-<;~Yi.\',,:t :~~~. ~ength 95th (II) #217 173 51 176 13 45 47 19 #308 :" r;¡.o.. ¡;":"-~Q.r~tmf~m'~;~¡~\t,f2:J8. :.~f.J1';¿ 1i7',1'S:1F" .~' ": :~~T; "~':2IJ1~e;,..,~~~ '246!1~";¡-1~~~,¡¡;@",:::,-N ~.:~~~: ;¡Iock Time (%) ~~~~;:;[~~l{%.~:~;:~r~~~~~:;:::": . ,::;~T'¡:":S:,.,~;":J~¡;,;t1:;'¡¡;I_,!~)ef¡:fw]'b;fi:,:;;!¡;,' 5C'.~¡'~~!;¡ll1!~æ¡~:';~¡;~y~::'TI:":.!f"4!;;;~¡¡;~r' ~":;~ff.:;'" ::. :;:':;~"~'¡t','J?:;l~~~""'7Æ{\mt~:C:: 9~:' ~!!y alock Time °A> ;:~ .-.. :,¡;:e.D. alYilyeJ) ;~Ji~&i~;rr¡;;;;';~:::.&.t:<~:~:¡:IT~::;:~m '?: 1 ~~~~;!~F¡¡;':;tii¡¡?,;,.~~ia,gßi!:i!!l'æMìl!~¥ i3 ~~~\I)J~.!!l~';Jc).1.t,!t11~J~,,~e.d,s;~ p acJ,t)I;¡q u.eu e: m ay b e,lo n g e ri'i~áìi'¡¡í.n. ";,;;;;:;¡lrJJ.;~¥!':i!Ii;~~~~tIØi$" Queue shown Is maximum after.two cycles, mm'ãtY~¡m¡jjf¡¡~"t.r",~~ HCM Average Control Delay 20.7 HCM L"vel of Service I:i C M> vol d m~C~, tì'., N! t IO~~'¡; U.;g~i'll!T' '~I i:i"d;,,),,(~'ìt!J';!Þ'w.Jf',; i '¥;;-¡¡'f)F',~;¡¡I!"I\'!~~!~'l!"'~~ Aêiüèiêd êÿcieLengíh(S)' ,.......,' "5i:;"""';""""S~;;;';;tÌô;rtlme (sr"" ." .,., !l41i"~';;'¡;':-"':"'="'i""~ ~~tZeœ¡;"¡'!"'!f~6!!:0"~1\"'1 Cüt::1¡\ìe1fór:Sè~I:~'; -;", "'; '7.m.'~-'- t-Ciitìêàft8;:'eGro~p"""""">"""!¡'. . ,."" ",' "'. '\.u 'i\"""'~'" !..~ ~~ M:I021022621Comp Plan 8mmendmantlSynchro\2020 wilhout Weyer Ext..sy6 " <' 2116/2004 .", Page 2 THETRALVL3-FF51 "1' :--- ",.,IIl-'i r I r'I rJ ~ {II (ø ('II tø ('Ø fIJ rIJ (A (JJ rø r. r. (éJ 3 ~ ~ ~ r¡ "J '-¡ ~ 'J ~ ~' ~ ,41 ~ 'j 'j j ~ J J ¡ ¡ ¡ s S." "'\ t "~ + 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeu!er Way Exten!Ion Study 219: 5 320 51 &. Gatewa ;): 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyert1aeu!er Way Exten!lon Study -+ (', -4- -4- 4... "'\ t ~ ç + ~F 1i!~,u!'9U p......., "",....~~'t:l:fJ~t! ~\iI' I:U!k~~ I$m!~ I:S,¡~,\,N.::¡ 1:S~::;t!.I.,,~.t\~lc~\'i!iä;~j?~'tìj Lane Group Flow (vph) 94 1898 31 1973 49 73 400 107 O'!mJITIWIrn'00tn'(n)'~<>'ð~~','{'".?I,;z.(m5'171"'r-:,7'.24~-!-4'1'i\'::Z7!ffl".,~,..,¡,...,"',1<-; '" '4'""",~",~ õ¡¡ëuè1.ëñgtÌ'-95'itì'(ft{"'~~'3f~""'54..l'~';;;5-4"'" hie"" .. "53""""';5' ~~t9~" '10"""""":iiI<oo,:"~:},"",r t';h ~.. "-r">~'7e"J"7!\'i'Y"~."""":",'..'~'r,'11!'-~"^""I'~'~"!"'5'"e-=~""<r~",,:~a~'\ ::.0 "" 'J..""""""""""",'v"'¡'~'\'R"""'V""""""-"'"".---"\'1,."o~",..""""""""11', ...,,' -thûpBiôêkïlmê(%)"""""""8o,;,' >, ','", ",.,'..,0<.',"""'" 9~~.;!31~llCQ.e;:(~~%':',~~;~::3%"""~ :;,.;.ç:'èi: ¡;;~:m;,1~~:~;'t;,{¡;':dhfl ~~~;¡!A1J'~1S::t~l'{ Tum Bay Length (II) 50 50 75 100 ro.!!li:.B~B~'¡me~ 29'%¡.~!'¡9%3;¡?,;~¡m':"77.W;:;:~r,~,,^,,:; ::¡;,;~2~',,?,.:Ft,J;\1¡'¡;,,::Jj',,);, ;};!i,~\.1¡j¡@¡\"""""+" 95th ãêyB1OÒk1Îmë o¡. , 6Õ%~52Ò,r"i"2':¡~2'O"¡; """"""'.""53'%""""""""""'" ""'0- " ..W".,,~ BH!QJO~~~J.IX.~lÁt~'(,;Z~;Z }t-~;~ 4,:7,;;;;-;t"'~~~ fT';!':,;:;t.!i( .:!;~\:'i~,j>~£; cklzr,W""" ~~'f!~.æ.~f',~{¡;:¡ 2/16/2004 Page 3 L,:'negor!'~ur~~:~,"""""" ~'ttlO ";".'>, ,,",' ~_Hfo", '\!J:t,'I..:",'I+""'c'" ,'I"", ,fo ,"" ,. r~éA~",oW(V; ,~,I;.""'":,, .~.;9!'9..~.gbtj;ã\7f90i:)::;1900/;'I?:r-9'OO~,,;.,fÐOö, HíOO "J900,/.rÐOö:,;'}'rnOO~'~ LøreW~:h 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 11 12 GrèC!'~~ r;~~ .-:¡-:-', ~ "'~~4~~;ñiii%!J;r,~,¡¡~&x':'~1~',.;:¿Þ:!?'!'~tJI¡;ÿ;7t; ;' ';12%"':1!',~i'\l:~~~~d.¡;'~)';¡,1i,,~Wi To:ø! Lo!t t'~e (s) 5,0 5.0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5.0 ::- õ~~ 'Ï. J;2õ f, ~ ~ ,< ;', ~ . oq5~,o.tg'$~;tt$ tJ:t¿¡:i';O'0:?9';O:9 J 1'[ ii:i:j¡;~~) PO' ;':1;t50'~¡!B~~1'¡Ot!fiù-" 1.)O()~! 5'1}~~ Frp~. p~d~;~e! 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 0,97 1,00 0.97 1;1~7'pè~'!:il\e! :::-.:' ~.,..:>" J .~qi!It'!J2?~~~'£'<Ji!£4',;Q-o7$:1;OO.;&E~:.;¡,,-~;o;,9:eY.::¡mOO;\&";J;~'(.;.¿O.9!~h--:U)qÆ'~~ Fr, 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0,87 1.00 O,8e I;Jtel?~~~~a '::i: : ," :.,' .,' a:9~1Jg04~~fìM¡¡liš;OT!f5",Z~;PO;~.'1:Z4¿¡¡m;O;M:"""1:00;"!t:;;':o':,'~~,OO~,;,?{~:< S.:~, F!ow(prc!) ~752 4909 1796 5077 1309 1181 1616 1541 F:!YeiM1!".ed::1';~'~~'~!;~: @~j§1:P:O¡:'¡~;:*¡i;î,,;)¡Ö:95';~:.1;0ô;":t\".r;¡&;D7t):6g' 1.:00'.'.',"::::"YJ,0:Te~;~ Se:~. Flow (p~"") 1752 4909 1796 5077 948 1181 1207 1541 V~~~ e '(v:1, ~),~:.~,:.. ~ç ~ \if I;: ¡:,\:', C~J!§§_~2fl.~?§913~f~ß;1821 ¡¥~§2m~~~ 9k';":,'iN8¡;¡;¡:¡îi 65~¡9J~OOj~~ì¡ð"jg1: Pee~"~c'J~f3c:or. Pf-lc 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 p.,~C 1';1 oW .í' ';' ~ ) ~l. ~'.,J 1':.;, :;: ) . ~ ~1tf?!J_{.;¡ 2i§~6JJ¡;!!t:z.;~~,&Sj~¡:¡~ 6:;i~~192 ~~( J:1'.¡¡¡¡;), OJ La"e Group FlOW (vp~) 94 1898 0 31 1973 0 49 73 0 400 107 0 ~Q~m.'.. '. '",1 ;¡~'f.lO:lii}~(~1.~"""" tJfl¡œ¡¡¡¡;l °1;l~\'il1Pza~:1"1 0. §'~10"~~' °.Jmi:ì1.' CJ~W 1-'.!ivYVeh'¿!~"(ot¡-~'-"-2ò( 2% '2%'-"'1'A,' 1òA," 1òÌo'3Ó.A,>~3Ô'A,'~30%~ òÔ¡'- 0% Ò% eüT!3: õëk~fih~, U~¥'I\I' ,ð~:!1t;",f.U\-;;i~~fjMO+~1'~Odj@;~O",~.$,o ;~O"'¡;1!i!J~ CI¡fI-]¡"~'<9~';:';'~P iun iy:>.. ~'rot Prot Perm Perm J:'~ 00; ~~o SO !.;, ~~:i' .....¡.'.ß:.~~m¡~~,~1\~i'¡1J.:!~~~~'*1~mw-t~a~;~if~~1b¡ì£'Ì!ìI&i!~8~ P~rml::~d P~ft!~! 4 8 ~,!I:,e(,G,t~.c~;:G'{!)::{"l.!2.!,~f,.5X;~,:;::,;::';:. ,.,:,. 97"".,fS':'1::',~r';:;,' ,.ro:~,wi.~:~i~;Î1l!'¡fi.ifßí~i~9"~~'W1!j~ Er~ctlv~ G'e~.,. g (!) 1~.7 57.8 3,6 49,7 39,8 39.6 39.8 39.6 AC:crOféèl,g/CRf!'.'O ":~~"" G:~OJ¡,o.&J.i,;:">',,s.,.:,¡;,G~~~43'Y,\i"':~'~! G.34J"'tkcr;:!~¡;~_æ,¡pÅO,34,mt9.¡'3~~ ëI~tirnñi:'e i;';;:e(sj" .- '415 .. "5,0 ,. , Ú' 5,0 ..- ~ ,.., 4,0' '-.rõ ' '4:1) 411 I7ë'1'81i"EN..;J!Õ,., (S)'"R:;..;Z,O""'¡!;Z.0~,~~;-'-2-'CJ~"2',C" :.:<' ..,,-;'z,OÑ1t1F/,mf~~""'ß1:'~;ZìOJß~;Z.~I\~'~ Lø"eGr;>C.p(vp~) 177 2445 ~6 2175 324 403 412 526 iI'j:Bã!¡o,'p'!;èf~r~;!ì!,.'...:. u.(;~ ó¡"Co;39,'> , .~.. ;:;-;~'::O:O2':: cO.30"; ';.', .-...::" 7;';j1:'~,O;o6~~~~",~.o,;~ v's Rft:;o P~'m 0,C5 cO.33 ~: 0 ;::';;~;: " ~,,;.. :¡: ¡,~;.O.~J ~-!¡¡, U ,I .6,>:~.::'~ ;,~C: 55-::,' :;:9,1";""'"c,~ ~"r:T. ~-'~!S¡¡Z1LO7.t8j¡t.þ,t$i.W4.,¡;:~.o..9.\!(;1.íP}~,l!£>~ Un'fom1 O..lay. a1 49.5 23,S 55,4 31,0 26,5 28.8 37.6 27.0 ~1!!e!fF.8C'.o~"¡;4"'">:"".cu.J:'¡¡¡J:urJ":~>~, .",'" ~::'"'O:ï9" " '" ,,¡,~',ß'()'1'i1\OOß'!i..,"'1i),W'l\,!¡1¡q°ai!lWi?~ !'~êre;';';~'a(D~iey: ~2'- ' 1.5 .. 2.5'" ..' 6:0 6,4.' .", ---"0.1 . eX""" 3âX 0.1' .' L:,Ç!!'Y.,(SJ:!:i":~~,;;;,i;,~,1sllU'.'¡1'~t,,~~.rað?l~~g19l)j:~~{~.6.t6.R1r,;2~~..<' -"LA,', ','" '. , ~~1,~~~(!):t:~;';"~i~f;~iiit~~:I\m%~~Hí3~..Y~t~t~~¡;~'":'26'~$F."!!\"","~~m¡ .' .' . ,A;~ro8Ch LOS C C C ~ ~ ~~~O~~6,~ ~~~:>IMfi~~"i>l\~~¿~~=;~::~~! ~~ !iç],1Æo.,l'_@'lg~l~j!J~!MrI!1!2.~...qJ~.!I~~i~;¡~~\R1ffi}~¡;¡'~~' '. '" :,..' ',. ' ActuetedCycleLength(s) 116.0 Sumoflo!ttlme(!) 10,0 Ji!ImëI .."',,. I h.' '5::Z%~'ir {;'\!,ICUn7è-VêlTBI'fSë'lVíce;!¡:;W'?'1:'7;;li.I!'!,', ", ,,',' , , , ""d.~"\[OjJI_Lw- . ,.._,~,,-:¡ I .. . M:\02\022S2\Comp Plan amm~ndmant\Synchro\2020 without WP!yer Ext..!y6 ',,-..I ,. ,r¡ .. r : 2/1,812004 PIIOè"4 .... I m ~;sum m ~,.>t¡~)1m''!!¡¡SW~I'\!t.J~I!!~~1'iI~~1 ~¡_U'æ!,1' ",¡w-._tU\'1 ~§!!1!Þ.~tI:!!L~~'r)ì.Þ'l!' ~eé. e.d s ~ ce pâ cI ¡ÝiÆie,O e, may, b, e, I 0 0 g e ~.! . .~!i!.ß~j~£":,:;1':;¡¡¿}~~%~î¡f.¡;¡; Queue shown Is maximum aller two c:ycIe!. 1J11SY ~lÙljJ~~ \!:î, P'!J~enorè 7cft1èd e"'š~n'¡'S[è?~Yuþ ! Irêliñ'1 "!I 0 n å'~"~';'7:Ÿ::""<?i,¡:X;¡~(¥'f:' \~;!:}~'JJT.~i:"'¡,~. ~ ;gm øX m:!: ~!'-. 82\Comp Plan ammendman!\Synchro\2020 without Weyer Ext..!y6 ~~Vl3-FF51 (:) -vi THETRALVl3-FF51 - , .., ,." '- ..." ",. ",. ",. ,., .", 'III \611 .... '. '. \. .. '. .. '. I.". .. . .... . . .. . . . . .. . ~ . ~ .(' - '. + ;¡ 220: 5 320 51 &. 1.5 5B . 320 Ramp ;) ....' ~ 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way extensIon Weyerneeuser Woy Extension Study 220: S 320 51 &. 1.5 5B . 320 Ramp 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Woyemaeuser Way Extension StUdy ..,. ~ .(' - "- ~ t ,.. \. + ..-' ¡:IIQð ¡u¡Pu ¡.o Iffi'!. --I:~,! ~11! E:: ~~ ~ ~ YV ~.Ii3:rn::;!j L.'Im:; t:ll~ 1j ~i\'4\~;;¡-'~'»"-&miq~~\!'!\F\11.o1 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1-493 838 27-4 1-40-4 263 277 600 fJ~ !J!L!J2 gmL~~fB~lB !~1A~~~1J~~: ,::~1';iJ'[ji21'31L.;;~ J!~~:::::~'i~~~~ \ ë:íueue length 95th (1\) 9-4 m161 1-4-4 23-4 286 302 170 Ihtemi!r¡¡mJ(",Dt!ti'ID)~~3àO-r.!".""IT'~"'::"".922q, '~:-r."""Tf1f'2!~:r:S'i:1~~ .""-¡""~]¡¡I::.'fßw'", roiiiupé'lô;ttÎmè'(%) ,^,.. ,'C.'" ":' .""':""""'" . "..,' --. . '",":t.*.<"'-';"""':',., """"'-"""1:'-\,." ..'"",""" ~~~~~~1~}~;~:~~~\iJt:'~~ò~f.: i:::' '-:1:7,?7:::'~~~1]I.mY,ti17,~,,¡¡.¡¡¡¡¡iìJ,tJii'~d:~J !SOt1j'!~~~.F""""":::."7f8"~2o/õ" "'-,' "w""""'~N"""j""y""""":,;\,"':....,~\,,.'tk~:;'éè;J:"'.:~ 95th Boy BICx:II Time % ' 16% 27% ~ft~~,lY...{\:!t)1t.:~.l~;f;>€:f!~:';:;;~~"7.~J.i£':U., ",:;F;1:gj':'~':,:æ;¡J<r;;-:1E;~Ì~ìt~q-~: mt er1ð coo I)~ m m !l()'muw~~\~~~~f"'ßal,<¡"'\ ~\(,"~',:;~!íò',,'ff,,~~~>m\:~:h'Hráj.:~W,~!\j\~>!i ~1i\m~iÆtft\.~ r:n~V,PI~~~tA.~~~~~til&, e¡ ueu~;!s;m~te(ed¡by u p$treatT1.~elgnal. f;~:m¡¡;,J 'j' 'ý;;;::~';;;if[îtF-.~Ø~~f;,.\ ~!!~;;~?<,~lii~.~!:t:I~'¡i~t:B~~I:.I:j~.jti,VVBŒ~..WBPii¥'Wt:l K~w.I'IB ~~P¡NI:J J:.c,¡ NBH,¡t:!SI:j~\~\\IS~ IW~IStJl1 Lane Configurations .,tH 1'. '1'1 Hi' . , .01 1'1'1' @!mr:0\Ÿf(Vþnpl).K~~)¡'1'ì.~..kjj,Q~g"Oö~OO"'i19~OO~~960'.' :1900 'ë.nn1ö '71 soo:mJ!oomj'l~ GNlde (%) 1°,i, 0'10 2'10 2% ~iiJ~.f1111!f~7(~)~"~~~.o1.~~'9!~5.:0::;!i)1'5~~~)?:'::,' . ';";T'::,~r'5:tr;::~5~*;-'¡;5..q Lane Utll. FBClor 0.91 1.00 0,97 0,91 0,95 0,95 0.7e f;;~e ¡, It~ Iþ I,K~ J~?,*Rt~ì¡¡¡¡J~. 0;: 9~j'fiO 11:?1!'f ;;O'O'~j~mv¡~'" '.... ¡;::Ji..~~' $~~';: 6d ~f ~!!Oq Flpb. pedlblkee 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 ~j~[¡'i""Hk":':'(¡;ht;F:",,::m1~'\WJ¡'/l¡O"B5'jt'R'ITðO';",,'f\O'O~~f":;(" ,;:---<",,',}'t., '.,:r:J;o~;oo.C:'þO.85 F¡rpr;,t~¡~d"" .,", {bo '1.00'0,95 1,00'" .... ... ,. "0,95" "0,96' (00 :s..~'~t.¡;;!~;(Proø~~~'"1~~~ð~~'r'6!!1a7j¿[5f3a':¡ili!1tl~;f'i¥.¥t<;" . fi""""';';'7':~fa~'ð7.~~ Fit Permltled 1,00 1,00 0,95 1,00 0,95 0,96 1.00 Si! l¡rì'iFJ6Wi{p'e'ñ\î)~~§~,1~1'4~ g.)é'.34~1!!!}51'3'ð~\B~';~~t ':'2:i"."'}'(í.~:"~;1 ð~~fe~:( Volume (vph) 0 1-493 838 27-4 1-404 0 0 0 0 520 20 600 e....~ !lli!.~lJ!1f~.~ r¡'4"J;1}¡f.1Í!1íJ~ qy,~~ü"! og~ !o:O!""d;rrOð~9~ðO¡;~ OO;~r'A! (jO~~ CJ~4~~ ~"!'1, gg Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1-493 638 27-4 1-40-4 0 0 0 0 520 20 eoo Rf!.(l e;'~IqllP.!¡¡[ ~ívpN~gm~Å\tTh~ ~:e~k!œf~' ~~\cP.41i¡¡¡GiI~ O&f,_Oæ5!;~W:~3 ~ ~h{~~ Conn. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 ~~~1~1" ".~!:ì!¡" ~ Æi'.K* J;'fJ ~~~W,&'~, '" ~;1 ,,(, ;::::::<:'2% ~%':\".'!'r.2' ~ ~ ..Z'\~z~ Tum Type Perm Prol Spli\ custom !':..~~epìfJl~a.£~'¡~E4t~¡~~B'!:"~~;¡~~~~~~1! Permitted Phases 2 ~ Il!<Ilg~!ì~JÇ!1~~J.1.l:!.¡~~1te,9J!~~~~~~2~!!.íf&/~;~~M,q Effective GreM, g (s) 66.-4 68.04 13.0 69,-4 21.6 21.e 36.e ~q¡p7.¡,.D~¡~~~O ~'¡1"9 ~.e, °A~_~\$'~"8~~1i'.~..~~O;'~ o, «....0;;12 CleaNlnc:e Time (s) . 5.0 5.0 "5,0 . '5,0' ,..' .. .. ¡:õ '¡:-ò ...', 1V.öI'1 r C!ð'j ~ ens I on j {S )'..iìli¡¡1i~2j Oli!J!l!Zi O¡¡¡¡Ii1I~'2¡ Oi~'% z¡ 0 ¡¡o¡¡¡w.~)¡~W\¡¡¡¡é'\/¡'\1\'Iì'¡¡::.\ r~1.f"""~¡~~;':~;C:. om...¡œ ,---- . 08' ~,~ :- 2/16/200-4 Page 5 M:\02\02282\Comp Plan ammendman!\Sync:hro\2020 without Weyer Ext..sy6 THETRALVL3-FF51 2/1 ðl200-4 PlIgee ~ ., 'I \,1J1 " ~, \1/1 11/1 rø tll \ø lø 'II'. (ø Iii r.j '. ~. r. rtJ '¡) 'I ~ ,..' 'a ,'3 ~ 'J a -a -a a a a aa a 8' . .... 221: S 320 St & 320 . 1.5 NB RamI'. 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeuser Way Exlenslon Study 221: S 320 St & 320. 1-5 NB Ramp 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeuser Way Exlenslon Study - ~ +- ~ t ,1;.. 4 ~ ~ +- ,\. ~ t ,.. ~ ¡ iir ¡;II ~~,_t:~,! ,1ìIi¡!:8B ~XV ¡¡.I.<t~. N ~ ¡¡ J~ W;¡¡'\;'Jr!tjl~~,~¡:j;~~,\\l\~~ Lane Group Flow ('I)I'I) 1164 849 1220 525 461 q\l.~~e.!lgk!:..~m}~~:~.~~œ.4Jo::r::'340;::æ='~, "': .:;~'é~ ':;~;;:;:r;1;¡%fjí-i¡,'$¡'1',!,~~~9:l.;' Queue lengtl'l95t1'1 (I'l) 138 26 84 481 413 ~'22~~"~,'¡u'72'O~,~""r"1311'>1";;, '."~ "'ë;'.tr-."",...n;,~,-.,Û.",.""i"~".,4!,,,,,.F..I': ~"'tJ':~~ffÎ~~1~"Q "..J.",.,.,.... ':m:.k'," "",..;"',' ,'v.,...."""".",..""~..,..,u,,.,. 9:st7îiUp"aloe~e;l'j\,}2.">;~':'; ~""'i!';:' 1""("" ~' fûiñéíYtënotl'l (lif " ,-»'< "'250 ;¡';-""-/l;;¡:;-2tò' ~Æ~J1W~~<:;":' '~~~36.o/ò.':: 29o/ò*~-::' 95t1'1 BII)' BiocIt Time 'Æ. 4% 34% 30% ~!]1~O~~.~.!tl1Y.!!ì}~~~" ,j~~JI~/"154:~::~:~} i P ; ,:~g'r.~:¿ìt~~\'~ ~'~""(!~~J!:.!:~L"""I;,j I to': 1:~~BW:R""@J')j~!:YI3!:tlill1'1B¡¡\'1\\~NI31"í':IN~~~_I;i~~l:;mJ ~e~e Co:~?~atlons ,..--.-- ~t¡.~t ,'.,H1o","" "., "\"40.,~,, "y,,",..' , . ,,' lc!é1!"fIOW \VPm;~'I1t ".:..1 S~1.990."., !1Q<r.~,,19öq,:\,J~. j900jf!!OO-. J~]};;t9ód,tYJ,~ Grede(".!.) 1% -1% 2% 3% r5!"rin:o!11filii:¡~~"""'-'7"~5'.o:;r 5;~¡;';¡'W"~'~~-,\5:'O~~~~~75;~ '.',' '5, 0""'",. "",,;"'!::,,:'r~~f!,~~?¡~ Le;e ^u~¡1. Fector . . . " 0',66 0,86' 0.91" , . 0,95 0.95 . . ... , , . ' , r-~p~1~f!8~\Z,~ :": ;;":~'~~:t.~ ;~',~ ro~1@'~;;¡;:'i40:99S~~;;'!!"~{~';OO" f"!~~. pe~,~lkes 1.CO 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 F".~:!~:;"~;7§j:~<~'=:':~;S'~Ææ¡;:;ff:~:"o:~:rS'j;!¡'37;;3'.~?1':00', 0,88. ~:t ?ro~ec!ed 1.00 ~ .00 1,00 0,95 0,99 ;!~~~~;;"%~""'~~'?'""'~~1~7gf""" 76; " .. ""'~~r;: ~4~~Y:> Sãf£F'éW'tpe¡r;..)~~'7-:,.~::':;P17Sv"'r?,3~5<' ',':', ~':15.' ~""1em(1499":::&,¡,~r;:,::.;~;)~¡~~~~ V~lul"'.e (VPI'l) 0 1112 90:)1 ~ ':;53 1~7 515 0 371 0 o 0 ~ej~!!cvrJA('~ftr;P~!".~.;:,!:oo:=¡'I~:oa-~-::~:c-o, .. ., :OO"':-~ :c:J'r-.1:00}¡.",;1;OO",!~I,OO+1!:1¡OU1J;¡Ø:ou,~..J:;oq A~j.Flow('I)h) 0 1112 901 C ~C63 '57 615 0 371 o 0 0 lè'~ë;,'G~èt'iijE!~V¡;f:m:::"'I;O;!;¡J;¡,~9':":~f~ 0 '.,122:J,!~i!;';¡O:!'<:':52'!5'1s¡,':~e.1~~!;):P~tC:~~'9~ Corn. Pe~s. (#/hr) 10 10 10 ~O 10 10 10 10 HëëWe~%'."'~';Z% :;.~v 2~-!i:-"'~"';- T-"~ %~:"~::':~'!<!7'I!;tT":\4'!1";;~11;,t%:~t~~5V 7um í)?e Free Split ~~~~B~~...'!'};"o;;Z.':;~~;;~"":~:"" ".~(\ "":";T.;'II:~'"'<~'1J;;~..';:?,;;.~rt~~B~m Aë!ij~~"d:G~NG1jjr:p,;;,,';¡C~~,eg::!~J!!,O:;::::: ,; ..e9'.3.'::;:;;.":'!.':3(t7"¥'::37;7..;tf'¡..Rr~-t~f~ ::~ec"ve Green, g Co) 69.3 116.0 59,3 ~S,7 . 36.7 AC~e1ed"g,~i!!ò7J.;;!F- ,<:::;:,¡o,~O,~ ;OO.~':::: ';;-.:.,' o:eo. '.;;;~",TIO;32J'ff:~0:3~i.~~~<æ'~~t~¡;'~ C'esl'!lnce Time (s) 5,0 5.0 4.0 4,0 V~Ti1ë!P"~i1ò':f1;' a¥;...~~ 2 a ~"":~"";,"ë'-. ~;,- ë. 1. 0 ',,; . ~lif2i'Olf'6:1.'O~,,"';:í>L)"~"~~~ lan~ Grp Cap (";'1'1)' ,'" '2939" ;3SŠ ' . ;g~s' H -,' '532 .' 4;4" """'~¥" ,'.' Z¡SJ.~!!,g!'E'f/J!~';;~~';è H,~ ~ ¡";.: ~...íJ,;Z5 ];;Jh:::f1'7:-"":-, '-'0:24 -: -:"".:~ëO~1i5.0'i3J%!i'ü\'RÄ~~;}}~~<¡W!>í1'Ik'1J vIs RatIo Perm cO,53. ~@'~!!gm~ßla..~.u.L~ul~~~ J _~1híq, ~~¡, 0; 97è~:~,~j1~~~'\;f!i'ti.~t~a..'Ij Uniform Deley, d1 12.5 0,0 12.~ 39,4 39,2 f::tQ9~.~!l ð,t11!:L~ ç,L~A9~,u},.~1J~~qI~a!;TJ.~-!i.mJ!?J,t1fiP()::r",~~.;,Ì~\Ii~~~ Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 1.8 0.4 . 35.2 34,0 Pðl ~tSl:~glJ,~¡¡¡¡>1_r-I!_.N",3",9 :'1JI~:t.~h\1!f74' BJ:~73f1\!1?'1(,""'~Þ~ ...,-"" , '"" ¡¡¡'"",::¡¡""",:,...,.,.N!!"""^"""""'c".,(;,,,,)<,,.,,,_'R¡~~1 level of Service A A A E E~ ' tDtlCOuelS," ,,"', 'a'lI """i"J"i"3'9àHp,"""J~","'\\7:!~"'!" ",. . ;t\¡:IP~,_lli._@Yt\J_~,4..00iì,¡l'$;~~~A,.Æ",\(,,(,,-'",-~'!!J\..,\1',.-,.."'.,""'.",,:.,«>,....,,,,', .,."",.', ,'. Approach LOS A A E - - ((1\ ~ I]',~ rn ~;;'<,;J'~J!.w~1~~~~í!'=~>.ijfj~~~Ij,~~~l1:!!!~'1J1t~<;g~,~m\~j ~m ~>< ~~2\comp Plan emmendment\Synchro\2020 withOut Weyer Ext"sy6 2/16/2004 , - Pege7, 3-FF51 ~~,.. O. -n ~"1LTr<Ì~I;r.~",..,'¡:¡,'\! C "",'itW."¡¡;"<o\¡<t<;IMUI If Service " , ' ""'" . Ill! Y.",,_.~, 203"""H,C,M",l8,V,e,O."",. im,' .,",~",-'.'.'-".f",',',"""(~,"""""~*.'~~~ ~ I '..."""", ¡¡~ f\:. . N">,"""""""",-, HCMAverageControlDeay .", "'ìJ¡YJl5Ã¡j!¡~~£í;t'~~", ". ". ,5.0, ,,' I'!í"'~' ",' u ~~~,,!)IJfJ.!!O,.:;B{j! '~," 1"1."6'"Ò,'"","",.",..,,,sum,,.,O"fIOS"."tl~~,e",(S"),~"~,,,¡:,..,~.,J3((~:i1"C~A,"~".' , ".. A"'ctu'~-;lêYc,'Î~ Téíigî¡;" (s) ~1~~!.~'W;,'-!JCU;t7èY:èl'ë~S&~."(y".,,.. h.,.. ,. " ' ¡ Q '6~fCfM.tJtmt~n, d.",' ,,", InleFïð<;tJðÔ!¿"..,-""..,.""" ... ¿ '.""L."""'" , - .-' M:\O2\02282\Comp PI en emmendmantlSynchro\2020 without Weyer ExI..sy6 "1'.. - :2/1el2~, . r\ THETRAlVl3-FF~1 . - - -~ '.'-'-'ø'W'g'ø. ", '., 'Ð \ ø '.g '., .'ø'o'ø øø - ø ø ø ø . . ~ IJ . . '. . a 4I~ ~.... -.. ',f. ..- ~ t 222: S 320 SI & 32 AvS .J:. 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyerhaau!er Way Exten!lon Study 222: S 320 51 & 32 Av S ;.f 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyerhaeu!erWay ExteMlon Study '""+' "\ t ..- -\.. ~ t t' \. ¡ ~ Lene GIWp Flow(V"'.~) 245 1238 6 1062 142 142 177 106 ~.!.'!. !. \=.t;; ; ;;1.~ ,-;:~, ~ : 7. ~~:~QL$¡t_.œ~~~1!'~8f07~1..~l1!S:i~.'ì¡¡ìM1i~'¡;:~¡¡"~íM~ OueueLe~gt~ 95!~ (~) 255 165 m13 311 177 175 m200 m93 ~jf u; ~;¿r.~ if; 7~~ : ,..:. m~~ ° ß¡ì¥¡:~~)¡~.ø1)~'W!,~~ 5 !£&t~~,¡r::I!~::1: ~m&~h~f,~1bÑ~~M!¿t~ I!.~~. U~, 9 !~~I ~ ~ ,t ~ )<.'.". . .:'~7#$~!t~w7(~i{;;;JB:;,:::;1ì~~¡~ijj-;¡¡i\~t¡%¡¡;¡~~'¡.j'!:;.~1~:i Turn Bay Lençt~ (~) :0:> 200 150 50 ~!!I;B ay:~ ~ ~ .i,~¡ ~: .33:~~(;~-;:~~~,f\'?Ã!s:~%€*,,~;;¡~%>;;;:r¥;à~~}¡rlb~.\ait-¡¡;Bt 95t~ Bay eloc~ ii~e ~~ 2S'~ 27% 33% 14% 13% 65% 44% S; ~ ~.u l ~ ;.E. ~,~ "'1. (~,)J.:.E.;~:2 8~~~~ ::1i\~¡;¡ìi¡1~;¡r 'T"Z~1'O ;ìDg:~~RF-,}Š:!9fßJ~¡¡:¡tfP.ii;'Wi!~1J1,fg¡..~1t;;1 MOve m &01 l~-mtIj;¡¡"1/.\!f:II;r>!1<J::tll$I'{¡¡1: l:!,ttmt:,I:I:("lfÀV'I BUM1iVVl:!,liRWVI:! ¡Vl<;;lN B ~,,<,,'~!/(!;l!S t:I L1.~l~ t:I, 11m::; t! Lane Configuration! ,,:!II ""t't+...."'":...~,.:'",,tt't+. ':.""'"""""'I...",.,+,.~..,,,,~, ,'"" 't+" ',' ~3iít',~~è;!\' gOO/",:l9öO:1W~n:;;Ig{jQâ ",1 9Ob." i:'900,,~!J9O()]7fl9'OOJ-t,1 ~ ,aneWidth 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 ~~~~~~~~.¡;.jíi~!iA;i';¡:fi;'+q ~f~~;R'f' '.:~%':""y;;'+i?!'.1~~ Tõ\ãïCo;'ttlm~'(ši'n" 5,0 5:0' "5,0' 5,0 .,,' 5,0 5.0 ., ""S,Ó""5,Q ... gÞ!J,e&l.!11B ~lI1:!é,r~j'i[.Qlg;~(~~,~;~RJÖ?'h O:91;i~jif:%W:~¡f!O~95; " 0:9 5;)':'f}.~Y'~r:O!!~ì~:~: 00 ,~~ Frpb. pedlblke! 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 F'.:55;-pe~!~1~!": ,-,,_,~~I'J;tO::;:tC':J.,: :,o.;"..---';:CO .:' ~ ;CO-':"'-:;'?:f.M;F:}:'OO¡:;~'1!í;"ßITO~f.Cfo,%.~':5I F-: 1.00 0.99 ~.a:J 099 ~.ca 0.99 1,00 0,92 1'};P'~ë!;,a.êf:-:-~""ë:'-"'C1.1r5.' ,. !;oo~,:"~-"... '0.95 '~,C-:... ".~, '-:.:C-,95'\\' 0:98 "'~;t":;'\~ŠO.M¿m::O<I¡¡;~~ s.!~. F:ow (pro:) ~770 4829 F~:J '~C9 'S!>:! 1658 . 1755 1653 ")i't>er~;~e(F::::-:~~,~'::;"O]'~:?!Xr:;7, n.- '~.95 ~.OO '. :~' ,'~~O,95' ' O:M'.:¡;:".":\',;a:9:Si>4tO~ Sa!d, Flow (D~"") 177:> 4825 '77':) 'S09 1593 1668 1755 1653 ~l?iur:1e (V"'.h),,;-"'~:A.¡,":~,\,"2~,~.'f\.¡1,1~2~tt £06.' ,:;', e ',.SO ;~.¡;1' 2 ;,:,';..-2: 2é,+"i'ßO;,¡1\t.fj~2'>'Ji:;1.l7~48~;5;8, Pee~.hOU~r8C'.or.P!-'~ 1,001.00 :.0-:> ~,O:J 1CO 1,QO :,001.001.001,00 1,00 1.00 ,s;3j!',f;1cw;rv:rti)J<"..;'i,,;~'¿Ç2~~2;":J::'C'5'"::-:-7'S"::": 950"::::':'1'2~Z~2ì;g:f¡~eO;~~:2'h~~w. L8neGro~pF!ow(V"',.~) 245 1238 0 6 ~O52 C 142 142 0 177 106 0 C15f.~ é~!.. {fI.~ ~;,ì,:.L;';;;;¡,"£:kt"'.J"' u It..,; ~ C¡:;.~.;:::':tr,~o~-t,:'§t:~~i:Ì.V "Q.\;>¡,~,t\ 1,O8'ik1.\TJi\~ eO! B'OC~8I1e! (/llhr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 i,IJ:~Œ~'P_e~;:~{"p'~p~o:.~tlÐ:~1'Jr;;::'~,,;' ."~o: ,,' ": ¡:"';:'Wr~~"',SDI':I><"tl$~.r,!tjiil',~;",'¥.J\-'¡;.Splil~ Prot...c!e~ P~8!e! 7 4 3 8 5 5 6' 6 1'í!ai!~P~šëš ,:.'.'. '~1'""¡f{"'~'ò>~',!:",;..~ ,;--:-;"."':' :,'-:'7-::'::<' ,ë;~"':';1Q.:'¡-;'$i;:~MiE:~'~~ Ãc!uA'!e~dree,;,Gc';¡"^' 23.5" 65.5""""""'2.0 Ú.Ò...... -1'3.3""13~3"" -'15.2 15.2 . ~~'fcëñ:.[!š) ;:;""23,~~5!.~.!!, ;,', ' -,72;O-~' ".r.C::;:-;.f;'.r:f13:~j!'~t!3!3m;J1~W2;,61.5¡Z~ AC'.ue~e~~/C Re~:o 0.20 0,58 002 ~.38 C.11 0,11 0,13 0.13 C'."-,a!'t!~õe:T!i"".o'r!}::'-:;:~5".~¿..¡,..\;5,O :;:',,;.,:,:",".-:5:0 '5:0.'. '"::;:".,' ~ 5:O"::f":.5:0;;1;;;'~;~~5:~BSJ~~a ve~lcle E...e'!ion (0) 2,0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 ~øne. G:p.Cep (V"',.~)",,-;~'<¡59""~2Z25 "'.';'" .", ,3: .,~n24 "',".':~..', ~(\4t.<1.91'"ò;;".,},',¡~'Í'230f~21.7.¡tf.ìtii!::fl v!! Rs"oDrot ~O.14 028 :00 0022 .009 cO,09 cO,10 0.06 .¡'rJ~eró:Þe!;.f':';:;~'~'::i.::"'-'.:rr.1";::::;~r:':::-"'::~~'. ':" '0' ,'-'. ". :";. , .;'..,,;,.:.',c';'<"'tí.~2~l~;..~ v!c"!e!:o 0.89 0.45 O~g ~59 :.73 0,74 0,77 0,49 U~¡fóñ'n :J~lgÿ:~:,~::-:;:::::42.8'~~~4,g::~~, :'"" ~>!\ 2 28.7 '.;". ",. A9,8~r.49.7 '+<;::~n't~8;'I!ß('(ð';e~ ""O'J"e!.io" FacIo, 0.e8 090 ~C2 ~O1 ~oa 1,00 1.04 1,08 r~~ë~r~! Oéli¡ÿ;-:!2\"~~;::3;e}W:~';~~::-~.~ ":"-3" ::~:',\:~~~:6;;h12:a;:,i;;çt;;.-;?=' D!r~y í!) 40,4 9,4 58 5 2:.4 51.2 62,5 ~vëI:ë'-;S1!iX:!:~~7'--i,I';::;o.¡J'~:J}\J,;,'.:.f<-'-':' E" ":"C "::;:!"-.c:::.~:Ez;..',;:;-E".;3e~;;'jiìí" AJ)Droec.~De!"Y(!ì :4.5 30.5 .61,8 ":::l5':~ë!iJ:o.~ ';;;(iI'~;","/':I~~~~~ e ,~>\1'þ;';¡.::;;:.;.::r'--, " . ;.C:;-"~~irA: ~'!.Mi~i:¡¡-E*~l~'1 U!U~(JectIO n;. ~ m-_-'t;>,~¡¡,\'\t"'~~i!-+<~f)\ i!j Ì";,~""" '~N"!í-&~' ,~"l1!{~'¡!)'¡ilvH'~::!'~~¡<'U \4,\~~\\"'ìt~',<!'J:ðt ~.ø\:il!\\"'ÌtÆJí,';! M !D~~~m!'.\.f§!...9..§1!tP!!~;¡le:queua ,to;l'r\elere~:bY upstream.slgnal:,: .: 4£;~j¡ ;:J;::~;J:¡i ¡"~~,fi,;-":';ì"',,J!~i'~!~~;;'.'- '211612004 .. Pelle 10 THETRALVl3-FF51 I lc .. , ~~""I'I.'.'a'D'Q'D 11" 'II '0 'g '('II '11'(1 ,(( ( ,IJ '. 'tJ tJø .-. ~ . (J .t é) ¡ .. it ,¡ "I ~ ~:-fl-¡ 223: 5 320 51 & Weyert1aeus~w.y 5 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeu!er Way Exten!lon Study -. f - ¡Þ" ~ + .¡ 223: S 320 SI & WeY~.rbaeuserWy S 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeu!er Way Exten!lon Study ./ ~ ... I ./ - ~ f - "-. ~ t ¡Þ" ~ + .; ¡:.II~e""1,>U!l~.t:t>L~I:i: r~JyV!:H¡!!fWB ¡,~ rml:~,'¡' Ni: 1<~;N~ecr.1!W8i:,if~\!,::;BI:<~¡,'¡'¡W<TIø!\1 Lace Group Flow (vph) 261305 272 763 101 105 302 88 28 121 ~~e;~~,Q!j,~~l~J'P\;'~~~~~';q':r;;~~'; 16~" 8b"":~,~3:63':f",,!20;r;,,:~, 0., )',¡~~~~1: Queua Length 95th (It) m12 382 102 92 133 137 78 108 45 53 ~~]~;'!1!iTh~'};';';'J4 O;:::;':~t ~~1'2 5O"r",,!~, :,;\"18 ° ~." ';~:', ~'~m:~:2..5'e;~~ì'~::15r,M:rt!~¡¡~'. 5C~~ Up Block Tlma (%) S~~B-'~l'1je,(~).;,~:~"-7~'::'~T:;;;\:' --';::', ;:;:"": ,. ".:: ~~":""::~"!;,:,:,;;X:,573':':;;'~;;;:IT~~J,,,1 7",.., Bey Length (II) 200 400 300 5V,~~~j'/'>~i¡;~.~~i;:;~,:::;T' :,~"'~:", ¡',:',:( ":' 95~~ Bey Block Time % ;:~:rg:::e..~lf.@j)h\-;'¡¡~~f:8:"?~::;;;f":.:':'ff{JC:'. "it;':"""'" '::"2\';;¿;;'.';}:':~7;;~.-;~r\:,h:,q3.f<¡R:;;:'\22!¡~: ~ovel'(\&r1I~'i'H>1.mlíti!!}¡'fi~~EBL~J1i ¡:i:,!~!% t:BR¡;1\1"1Bl!'r;}W!:J r;Z,'WBK'1:\!JNBl;::<'NB~R!i"",¡SBUW~\~i: Jit'-~~tJ.I1 Lane Configuration! "ttr+ 'I ttr+, . .. .'1 4' .1'. '1 ... t . " 'ð~ÖW'(~¡¡pl)"mI":~Tf\Jtì();ii&J.900¡¡çI9ðö';":J900'1 900" 1900'£::1 0C>ò 1900 1900"'-1900;"~19~goa LeneWidth 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 ro1ã1~~rttij'íëJ'(ŠhjjRBì!:t~¡¡~:O;¡;;f::W~;rn~5:0 "5:0 '~:"i'?Jf::'5:0' "5,O:::t5.0::tF5:'O?:;;:;,5:~5'.~ LeneUtll.Factor 1.000.91 1,000.91 0.950.951.001,001,001,00 J:r'þ 5 ¡ þMlblRèš'J~q~šT~)frEO:~:g'd~;r::r~JM ";TOO",:':,:\?;?f"fOO':, ,1 ;00'. '.:'O: 99~"1;M:::,;:nX"~';öO Flp¡;,pedibik~. 1,00 1,ÓO 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 F'i1'ì&~',j~-;:?'¡1'~":I"'i'!'::¡;)T;'rðOyrO:9¡f~:"':;,">TOO'."'.'.1 liO'"'c;¡r<,,T:;;,:OO" ':1,00. '~'O,85 ?"'1:o.b;::'!rOO~'~ FltP~tè¿ì~d"""""" 0:9S"Ü)Ò' ".. '0,95 1.00 .. "0,95 '0.95 1.00"0,95",,00'1.00 S,a!Þ.JtEIOV¡-(~!Y\';:¿Z:í:;;;f1ZZO¡;$jZ~LfJ:;khnf!%ì 76\)',:"48 86":J',,'1:>:::]'!1'S$S: ,. 1,669 .':)5$4\\1Ti'7(1DJS63.è::~~!!'3. FltPermltled 0.281,00 0,151,00 0,950.951,000.951.001.00 S~'n5'èftrir:{;;;;~'52'SY44747~::¡;'Œ'Y:211' 48M'\:"':':;.':\;:{1àM'" 1889 "T'1554\",,1110';'?J8631Ø~ V~',,~o ;v~') 28 1094 211 272 746 17 201 5 302 86 28 121 ;:õ.~1,;~';!' 'oc'?'-:-""!': :~,-~:'9~~rOO:,:;:Tf:o.O::i',:00'i1'TJ;o.O~t;oor:':00.:r:1 :OO~:t:O~1)00;:mr.r..0'IJ, :'~', F'~w ~,~" 28 1094 211 272 746 17 201 5 302 88 28 121 [(\ ~'~'C'~;~' r::'-i¡'¡ r:-,>: ~)~~~-~(KI'Jtl5,(!.'*:~¡:,o.>:~212"~!,783;7);::?\~to.Ir~",'1U5'17:f302~aa~'2g.'Efi12.~ :c~~ p.~., (~,"j 10 10 10 10 10 10 r:Jš'!'!' ock ¡, ~ i' 5~ ~ II ";')' '7":'" ';¡O:;¡:)*,1¡!f:2~Y1¡R\,;yo.T':)'¡TI1'TI'i'O'::;;1¡:;JÇ.'2~'DTO~;:C>::~f O"T']'!':.'" 2' ~~07-1W-!i'f.~ 7~'~ 7;-":9 :"".pt pm+pt . Split pm+ov Split Perm "'o~ëc~1."!. :>"ãšè-5~""""" '~~~';¡"IZ't7~.!X:;:;:f!,'~~;¡~g~:'i.41í;!¡~:{¡S." :.,:':i'S\:1~;.f1;\)':í;l1..t'lÆì~::~t1iì'lifúi ?~"""'!ej 1"a.., 2 6 8" t:~~~i1 f(iè . G ':'t!é¡;' G'~! 1~4a¡li1~(4 ~;7~tJi~~~"f:!'.\T1:0;()"\70 :O'¡¡~'1m""Jçm1J;~}' '11;1";3 7:7¡;)1\'1 0': ~~ O',e]¡ß-J,t!. ~ ~uec,'veGr.~~,g(.) <'3.748,7 70.070,0 12,112,138,710,610.610.6 A:-:'¡¡¡"e~;¡ 'C~~~:ò"':"":"~::'19M¡¡'().~J¡¡!Ù~',¡P, M;::0:60'(~t'f;'\~10::' . :0:1'Q"I:0:33f;:P:09~C);~ ::;'.n'n"ceT',...e~.) 6,05.0 5.05,0 6.06,05.05,0 5" ~:) Vi'~'c'e-:::X";i'š:c~'1Jr~J"~27C'm2,O~FJ.'*Q¡;:¡'~ì2:0Ti:':2:'0~9!;~2:0-:- '~Y2;O\t~2:0';?~O~2 ~~':! _""Ci":JC.~¡",,!'j 2471911 5072948 174 176 518 162 17:: '£~ y' š R. ::0. P fc f-'" --;:----'0, :&K'\ì:9.,;¿7,""¡Hjþ:~¡~11.~O:12;;;;'0;ì 6;P5itrd~O:o.ej" éO:O6'f'éO~~31f);O:(),5~:t:;o-:o ':' or:: 1 v'. ~.,'O Pe..., 0:)4 0.20 0,06 <: ~1 ~Z5Jl3:ä0.õ~ii¡.f!~¡1',t7J'i'1W/%;0:!Jit£RlO,~mi;¡¡;i¡;¡'k:fc0:54."i7; o.':26'i;',;dr,1,;¡:~EO:sg;';Q': 8 0, G!o.~58TI¥.O~5:rw¡0èI ~ ',:,!". ~ Uniform Delay, d1 21,3 28,5 24,1 10.8 49.5 49.6 32,0 50.3 48 ~ ~. 1 I?pgFs.!Töh;F:ãc1~(~'O;:!¡¡~,0:57.~{';!..o.:5 5'17o:a1'¿t~?~,nI1':OO:'.;:1 :00 :::',;1'. OO:::ç:f;OO~J:C'--~ ~:::'rO Incr~menteIDeley,d2 0,1 1.8 0.5 0.2 3,2 3,8 1.1 1,7 0, ~~. DëT.¡¡Y;(!Íì1r!¡1tt?r~'j;:p~%1C:1!~';¡:8;~:i~tff:O~\i..¡¡z'j;;:) 3:6' ',,: '. '6: 81¡¡:;¡¡j~;: 5 2:7î:' .53 :2'p33:1:;:;::SZ:Oj,>,@ . '.::; :.".::,'3 Lavel Of Service A B' BAD D '-roI cr,-, D F ~~,!:þ',a tI.\¡~IàY'!rmli~;~:¡i:;r\lH¡îJí!~W¡';"VL~;3:¡'1':d.f~ ',i':e 8:6:':l\f:":':N'Jg":~i;:¡"'r ':41: 1,;):- J;1;¡;-¡:::;~il7ð.~:~~¡;~r,;¡'1 Approach LOS BAD --.....~ E 1m ~ I)'1pUt1) IT\ alYg\~'I:.~;¡¡t't;(T.'W"':~J.í"~;<I~~{; ~¡;,y¡¡t<;i,'Jt,itJ ¡"ì:")\i~(l,,)'.~~&¡,«'1)!~~i>(i~,~ \~'I!¡í4%í4~i~-%tüW~tm:,¡:#',:,;~,! mn.Y~E!!Ìß.:t~~~?\rr~~~I,e queue Is meler;ed,byupstre.m signai;,. ,:'~)'1;;,~":';;;¡'!'k>:m;,;~,;'¡;:"1;"oti.1r!"¡j;,:¡?;¿ì~::,; >-;¡'Ii\a¡~f!gìL"';;¡'¡;'>ð'¡N',f."¡;:" '~~: HCM Average Control Delay 22,3 HCM Level of Service f'f C'1ffiVi51UrM':Iõ"C~è1 ""1"å Uõ,\!:¡;:\m¡r;\¡;¡l'\'J'-:-6'!Plr:t1;!;\'Ç;; 'V~¡1'< ""M;m"1'.~~t" :;n'; '~~""'~ ~M' . ".. """^ J ACiû,.',;;'.'t~dCYc.I'~, te~i¡..,h. gf: . .:-'óiW'(.-'~'1'1tÔ"...... ';..~.' .'.". ',;'..^,~.,š7:~,'¡~r';s,',.tf~'.. m':'<1!<. (~t. '. ','.,','.',',.','," ...."."". ..'.'2.'.~.,õ."m~¡~"'{~;~~~.,.". , !O«~. "","""./t"'. ."'. """'.,..,~... . 'n.t~~cuõ:'ri;:CapecL¡Y;;PJl11za\lón. :[¡;j'~~.;;>.1>,~?:'iEIT;,'I C U l'iiVe!'òT'Sãïylcøm" .:';i',:'::"~'~, t~"~ c Critical Lane Group I ~ -!'~ :2116/2004 Page 11 M:\02\02282\Comp Plan ammendmantlSynchro12020 wi\hcut Weyer Ext..!ye :211612~ Page 12 THETRALVL3-FF51 .c: .' -.¡ . i ! - - - - .-.-.. 224: S 320 St & Milita::r.Rd S ./ ~ t 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension WeyerMeu,er Way Extan,lon Study ',. ¡ ~ ..- ., f'" -+ ~ fJI ~¡IJ!P'J~~ I:: BL'1¡;;!: t! .~~!:: t! R~¡Sa;:wa~~mm:1:;1m! RF!1!ì SB~'j¡\;¡SB ,I ;i¡f~';:¡ ¡¡ K~l:~VJ;¡'î Lana Group Flow (vph) 103 1164 215 234 1091 123 126 78 215 256 150 q~,ðJ¥!j1~!\t~1(~n~þg1,7:?109"'r;?':"ö3~16e" ,:18Ö}"'.(5'7":"91:':"~&OiÄ"P15'1i'~;jl$~;;!~Z97!r::"" QueueLengU\95U$!$ m132 164 6 252 252 77 151 44 223 264 73 tQfë.nrèl¡rJIT~J;~.¡;(,~r",12W,',,:,i7!"(':,': '427'," 0',' ':'500"":'7.'7"...?'~":!'27ö'3~:?"j:'"C;P7T seth Up Bloc!< Time (%) 91!!!I~~è'"(%~'.'<"7""" ,'^,,-',,'. 'C()'<'7"" ..,. TûmBay(ëi'Îgiti(fÌ) ,,0"200' " '.' "'200 5O1¡¡::B'1fy:Iyõëkmm¡¡:%';5';~~":: ":~ç.1 %; ::ii';:'1.::;;;"'-"". 9sìJ'lBwtëf¡,:¡;-tïme\C"" '3% '., '20%' 99.!,Ú!~~K!,Q~~ìiJ!â;1'\T.':'r:~-:1 1.':":'::5;: ,;JL~i 37' (I)'¡¡~'{.OJ..ù!J1.ð:!.Ç~,~?Jh;pe~ntilequeua I!matered;by upstreamslgnal." 2/18/2004 Pege 13 Qø..ø.øø..~øø...~~~~fl 224: S 320 St & Milita!:LRd S ./ 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemeeu!er Way Exten,lon Study ',. ¡ ~ "-- ... I ..- ~ ., f'" ~ -.. Mòvemen I ~,".!""'¡'¡,,J)M~h" E EJu!;!1(EB [;WE BH 1'; :,w5rmrwtJ E!',,:WB~m¡SŒ'f:"f'1~~I:Jl!,~'1'- S B rMi11>BR lene Configuretions 'I ttt r' 'I tt1+ '1'1 t r' 'I t r' Idêãtl'low(vpfìpl),;'it/':"?'IM07t::JOOJ;'}900 1900"1900 '19M :'1900 1900 19OO100J:-,:1gðO"r{~ leneWidth 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 TòlMLbst tlmå'(!j"'."",""5.0%5:0r;:::S.0 '5,0' 5.0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0'°':--'5,0-;:"'5:0 lene Uti!. Fector 1,00 0,91 1.00 1,00 0,91 0,97 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 FrjJb:þ'edi1Jlkëil']::".1:00;:1n;(j<J':~":1.O0' "1.00 ,. 0,99" "1,00 1 ,00 1,00 1.00'"1,OO'::,'O:'gg Flpb,ped/blke, 1.001.001.001,001,00 1,001,001,001.001.00 1,00 Fif~"::""'r"c:f,,,,"'V1\'";',";'f:OOn;~f.OO';JO:ff5 .: 1,00 "0,95 "'1.00 1,00 0,85 1,OO';:,1.0Ö'~; OM Fit Protected 0.951,001,000,951,00 0,951.001,000,951,001.00 Sâfd;'F'iòW'(piol)'T,;F"?":J755.'1'r49í8"'è'1583 , ,1770' 4851 ' ' '-3.(33' 18631583' '1770""'1$6:3'::-:'1540 Fit Permitted , "," 0,95' "1,00" 1,00 0,95 1,00 0,95 1,00 1,00 0.951,00 1,00 Sã!d:'F'IóW(pè'lTriY"':':;r;"~¡'T1755~9lí5~'\T583' 1770 ' 4651' .' ,. '~"~33 1863 1583 1710T']863'7':f~'O Volume (vph) 103 1164 215 234 762 329 123 126 78 215 256 150 P'êi\J(:fiõûnãaõl';J'HF7);¡l:0~TOO~1:00T""l:OO '1 :00"";1',00":"1.00 1:00 c, '1.00 :"1'OO:}1¡t.cœ-:.:f,'!':UO Äd(FIOw(VPh) . 1Ò3 1164" '215 "234 762' 329 123 126 78 215' '258' i50 léàñiimõüp!=löVì1¡¡Pti)'!;',;';'1'O31"Tt"64j7':'215',' "234' , 126 ,,:'78,::v215,";':"-2S8"",.\f50 Confi:Ped':¡#lhr) '4-"'10"" '" ., 3' -.. 3' Buš'8rò&àòei'(#~rf"!')1n;%'2~'017""0":',"0' 'o'o"'n'O'!",!,i~'O~;:~ Turn Type Pro! Perm Prot Prol Perm F'rõféi:le(F'hã~'ës~x,r:';i'::'~'~fS:';:'lr;yZ'7':":";;": " 1 6"."'7;'~"".qr,:,;~ PermlMed Pha,e, 2 8 ~ A'éWiiled Gr&ên;G'(š)':.;"i'10Jr.'~:a.5:~:'S'45:~:',19,ß ' 55,8 ':; 8,0 11,7 11,7 c;17 :1)",20,9:1'::20:8 Effective Green, g (,) 10,8 45,8 45,6 20,6 55,6 9,0 12,7 12,7 17,1 20,8 20.8 AëtVetèdg/C,F<i¡t1ô.:;:";"'O:O9i'r¿ö'.3^9'~:,O,39'O,18 OA8 """";O,bß 0,11' 0:11 O:15::,)",0~18;:r~";0;Ig Cleerance Time (s) 5,0 5,0 5,0 6,0 5,0 8,0 6,0 6,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 Vêhiélå:EJiteriš16if(s)"?'!ê"F:2:0TII~:m::':,~:2,O" 2,0' 2,0 ,',', ,c:: 2,0 '2,0 '2,02:0'~ê~¡'2.Cr",~<;;2:0 laneGrpCap(vph) 160 1932 622 314 2229 266 204 173 261 334 276 vis' RäUö PfW':,c"'k , -- O,Oí5'7èO:24?Z¡;::":::., 00,13 0,23 ,:0.04 0,07 . ëO,12 "cO,1,(,:";';:,':F' v/! Retio Perm 0,14 0,05 0.10 v/i':-Rel!ô"";':':: ".,..., ':0:841',>:0:60":,,0:35 0,75' 0.49 0.46 0,62 OA5' 0.82":0:71"~i~'Q'.54 Uniform Delay, d1 50.9 28.0 24,7 45,2 20,S 51,2 49,3 48A 48,0 45,3 ~3.3 PlOgfésillon FàctOf'/:::O,gO't~O"48:a:O:13",1,OO 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 '0,88 ¡'O,90~" 0.(4 Incrementel Deley, d2 5,3 1,1 1,2 8,1 0,6 0,5 3,9 0,7 15,6 7,9 1,0 Dèìay-C{s»('y';;' ',,';' ':,\S1:0;t'~i713:9J;i7';;:S:"c53,4 21.3 53,2' :,,4,9.1, 'S8:Q'.';¡t4ð.5":I:3:t2 levelofServlc,," 'D""B"A D C D'ici'ìe D" C NfP'Cõâcl'\:Dãray-{SJ}f'1""iD"R:~1'5"'..1~P<""';" . ,.. 27:0' "ê"""!':")' 51.8' .':'~':::~;4ð.1~-!Im Approach LOS BCD ::..;:: D ' [~r6l'j!é~Jo II'¡SU I'll tff ary,,~':\~'~ \:R~¡¡,W1;',:t:,\i/R'-.'h:¡:,~",;'Vmii\'>~~\"~z.:,'J"N(~i'."rl,'r~,~,;:~":~,;Ij.\\I.'~, (,,\Ri¡~UIJ HCM Averege Control Delay 27,9 HCM level of Service C "O,- HCMYölûméfôCiiþ'äetty raUõ7T:1'W,r;';'Fo,88," "':, ", . :~L ' nT' r.n;t":;:;'t',~~ Actueted Cycle length (,) . 116,0 SumOflost'lIme(s) 15.0 ',...""" Inlãfs'ii¿tlòifCàpâd¡YUtíllfáHoñ-:;::;';:,70.7%" ICU level ò(SerVlce ,C "."~~::~. :"7:;'" c Criticallene Group t- M:I021022821Comp Plan emmendmantlS)I11chro\2020 without Weyer Ext..'y6 \ 2/1612~ i \ Pege 1~ "ETMe'" " '" r \ ' - - - -- - - 2~4: S ~12 St & ~2 Av S 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyert18eu!er Wey Ex1en!lon Study -+- ") f - ~ ~ 1I'cve:::er.'~'!!I«i..'\.')';¡;ír.t:~ I ;¡,.;.::,~:{";'..,-,¡':._~:,J1.~' :':-'¡!J~j:LH'~~~..iwm~.¡IftmWri!.~ Lane COt'l~guration! ~¡. 'I ~~ " " å~~.z¡:.!...;::...~~.~,,:~:~~:;.: :':¡.-::: ~::,;:!,~~~':-' s~~:re\,&:IS~~iÌii~~'t~i.~'"\!\~~íiit~Sf~i~~ ~~~"~.(~~)';'y'" t...!,,2.~:! -~ 1 e 1:-.:r;;'J7~a ;::"" ~ ~~?%'t2!:5~~fj:=;ù!i~'i,"Œ;;;;¡'ßj!i:1i&'Z,\~'I$Æ':\I\'~¡¡o\\Î;,~~&& Pee~t-<ourF8C'.O". ~,:J ~.CJ ~,OC ~,:: 1.:>0 1.00 ~~D~e:-¡{e~:'-:îí;:!_2'.;:I'...:::'~ e~.":~'7.~T!.:r. £~7" 1~f"!f;21~~~\!I;'ft\44~:!'i'Ji~Tti:¡x;1,;iíï)f~~~'1 Pede!t1anl ~O ': ~O !;~!';e'}:'~~.~~J~)m;¡\;....~~.;¡~::rr:"':.."--:' :??':::r:.:"'~2::,~ -:. ~ 2:Ö;Y:~?s~tt~i.~--'~.BJ.;~~ Wal~lng Saeed WI) .,0 ..0 .,0 "'~~,~.l1'!.1~I!~=~-o:;gol'\.~";;','~",:" ::':: .,.::,::..,\1:"'"~i;'¡'~¡¡?E.;~\il;j:~%'¡;¡t\"¡¡;:!£~'t]i;rFf~TæMl R!;~llum fiare (ve~) '!.8£:_1!-'!1f,)_IA:'.k"Å'!;$'-!1'.:;'.,;:,; -:"., -:-"~:-::'-':;7::-'/;~~i!j\'ß¡'í1t¡¡;i;;,1í(~iÏ'jä¡;f':~[<~~fê1i~~¥!:Î'¡~iJ~,¡j! "'eC:ien I!orage ve~) 1 ~i!!.~~.~.~~~~;¡J 23") ;;r-.~:::'~! "::;,~~1<e;:J:' .'7~11'~~-¡¡~WI"Ø;,1;'--J¡¡¡1~~ pX. p!eloon un::loö<eC: ~.,.,~~';;Si-!l~g!lte......~!i".~;,,;'~;'":?';; ;'.:' l~4~~::r-1D- """.7!!Jæ~5z.í!r_xZt~1iW~JÌíÌJ1.1:~trf_J!\\~y."ä- \'C1.I!eoe 1 cor! vol 294 Ø;¡2~:.Ica".l,co~.yo¡.!1".!¡.6L."'~"""I>-'-'.",~, I""'~ ..",':-:;a"9j~~~t\;¡%r'i':iJ'~iMiW%'f'~¡\~t't(;~.f¿f~ Ÿéü.u;,Þ'~êëtŸol-"""""-'"'-'À8""""""'~91"'>'257'",'. ....>e. ..','.M"" ~,. rr:wi.II~:le.{8).(,)ql~:iiI1':'."",.ft" '"./"~:,";4:f;<:Y""r"- i6.fitõQe(I)"'--""""" "~" ~1JJ~,jó~,~~:'..'~::::'¡~' 72. 2 '. '5!,,'~ ;;::;:." 3T5~:!I3~¡¡:i\~¡¡~;¡~-rwJ~!I\"1¡1WJ1['~WÞì.~l:I:ilf7~"¡¡"'% Poqueue;¡'ee%' ,', ,." "'.. 93"'" 65""'71""-""""" ,'.' ..,'.. '~"". ~~~.!!9'.;)'..l~~"\).;::iiW~~,;;:'~~':T;~:?_O~,g ;:;':~;¡Wi. ' ~ 'E~2Bl~.¡f'~_~_~m~~ R~ uaQe¡ Mm¡w.,-..=\.1 !m,~'?~!'¡xv. ~ lEi W 8) it ~ y.¡ B¡ am,N B i1!!nf\i8 jj¿:i1imm1~¡f,\!im'¿.-mm.t¡!~-mmIt¡fm1¡m;~ ~Ý.t.nmt!l~~5j¡'ìt~?g!ii.~« _22.fw.~¡~ 5.îl~1;~ ¡¡f't$2~.5 --,\¡~-~_t~'\~ Vo!umeLef\ 0 0 77 0 0 148 0 ~ DIu!" .~~ ~g> qm1:a:..1~q.1!~P~~Q m1'fO~2,'I;5~}.á¡¡4,~1iiJ%~~Þ~Jì!¡¡IJ¡¡¡~*mw ~ . 1~ 1~ ,~ 1~ ,~ m m ~.& ¡¿"~ P'~.~/y ~_.Y11.í1~)ls.mtP.m-'!ii2]j8iJ'¡~O\j"3Rlli O:35':WJ.j;oJ~~~1@'¡~~~~~~~íî%ì¡@j;!¡;\~líè QueueLength(tI) 0 0 6 0 039 31 ¡;!>!J.!£P.tm1.~':;'( S)~~O", gr~ð;9m~7~0":. °t~~Zð:O~.j~ 9'{~;j~~:;};ißj¡¡~~4¡¡¡¡¡ili}¡¡~l«1~~w.*_.I~ LanHOS. A C B ~~~~~r~W ~io!h Rì¡ml"¡!':::rø~1}~æ;;:è~~¡:;;"l1;~~~¡jf~Jf.ifl¥t¡ý,¡~!Wi~JiW~~~ 1lt ~ &rJ8 CUO r). ~ m lItY!mlmilm;m¡¡j ~",mi 1t!.,.:I\ '!§~'¡tfm¡~ÞŒMf¡f(~?~;rfti;¡ì¡11~~ ~Æm~t~W¡¡~1I Average Delay - - -- .,3 !J1~,r:.s .!9!.21JJ.ç !~!?. (J,t¡! lZllt ~ Z;'¡~~~,1'4. ~ a::7:,r.: ;.~<tf.1 c U:t:ëVerß r Sé¥ èe J¡¡4ß~¡ ¡g¡,"f!i,C':f.w..1: Þ.~'hg¡"¡¡f;¡¡';¡'¡;í¡¡:;'ìié ~m C»< m:I: - ,Camp Plan emmendmant\Synchro\2020 without Weyer Ex1..!y8 - ,~3-FF51 2/16/2004 Pege 15 .... - .. .. .,... .. ., .... ...", fl.,. .,. 9'.r.~~ 497: S 312 St & MilitalJ'Rd S 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way ExtensIon Weyemaeu!er Way Ex1enllon Study .J: ~ t ¡ ~ !,J] =1(!~ 1.ì!:Q\: ;?'!l~£. ~ !¡;;;-~,,:: "'-~~t'l1: ~~;mi\J;¡S I:; Iim\ti,~ì~.~;-¡;tJ;:¡;,,\~~~t~tf~~1M:""!:?:1à~'11j Le~e G-ouo Flew (v:>~) 291 217 319 361 729 ::m,m1:ën;t"\"5C'.1\'ï~-;""T.208wu!p~~181,,?>~';"::\216~"1:f~î-¡~¡,~;,"f'" "õ,,'¡ :,"'nr\:~,~~~~ Queue L~~O!~ '9~1;;'(~) ïí3T'3 65 #:364"""113' '322 . ". .' ,. ., "" " , ~~~;~:~~WfW2Jt~~;f.?~27(Rr"): 9îe'V~,¡'t;' . '7;.":~ ~:~~~~~\:,~.J~{;$~i G'S¡!ìP~-Bli5ë1<--;'!iñë"('!1.J;,....~~.~.f~:F\Jt.'~ê~:~ ':':",:iò~~;r~~ ~:':T-':-". \~t~¡:¡:;.';'~\;.;¡{~.,~ 7urn Bey Le~c~~ (~t) 5~t!i' ,!3éY:el~1(':"'.~~ "¡' :.F ~~~~J,'!J¡-.w.:§7:f':;~':'~þ'[:':.tR~~",~!'f::~:';"7-'~1~1.;'1?'::;;;l~~t~~..~ 951~ Bav B'oc~ 7¡..,.e "0 0 ü~r~ ~""!' ìFii\r~{(Vèli): '0; ~ . _&~~2?t:"¡r~~1 (~'f.v?~t'li~t:;(.~ ::-:;:::;~W~~;~~ ~~ I)lS[Im m aJY~~f~"'U~lM~~i~~J~ß~~N¡~P'.~~}! Y~~'i-l!mm!t..m.'!If\ 1ó\'1 ".Ii9,5Jlj¡þ_e_~QIII~1\:PJ!!ri):e1~~..!.d.&ça,~~9!J~¡~lie~e,may,b~:.long'et~. ,¡);,:"~~' .' .S',;;, >""i¡:;-,;¿Z~"~~4 Queue shown Is maximum after two cycle!, -urn »X QI r'l rr ~-': ~.... . ; M:\02\O2282\Comp Plen emmandmanl\Synchro\2020 without Weyer Ex1..sy8 I .,~ , W1612004 Page 16 THETRAL VL3-FF51 - - - - ", .., w .- " 497:S 312 St & Milita~ ./- ") 2020 WITHOUT Weyemaeuser Way Extension WeyerMeu!er Way EXlen!lon S\udy t + ~ ~ MOW m en t-W>1'..~;¡'¡¡ to Bl.'illl ;:¡¡K~<,r:J B ~ B,I~\;;¡.~.:!;g11:1:'5.~:~.~'~f...t.'\!I~"~~j:!f.¡¡¡I»í~U~~ Lene ConflguraIIOn!'..", " ,T"" . ','t ',to Lcr!BN' '¡~@J1P9.]~[~l<!.~~) t>:>:', ',~: ~ ~:;.:; ?:!11ööii\1'9öö'£\'i!9 ÖÖ;t:'&m",Fi¡;_:ii~k€tû¡;j~~l?lf!k1i!J5%:..ø'f Total Lost time (s) 5,0:: 0 5,: 5,0 5,0 ~81! ~ -:'9.~~~~1¡~~ÖÖ¡(~~~~ : : ~ :.:..-;-, ~ : C ~ :~~ ; ~Q&rLtiööEi?:~\ì'¡;?ta*,,),ru~a~#l~(ii}t\¡".;titiib~'t~J Frpb,pedtoikes 1,00 0,92 ~,C: ',00 0,99 f!P.~ù;¡:fSJl~~¡~.i" ;OO~~: OC'~ ~:C:~~ i:'OO?;.;1;oO;%,~~;;2)?45f1~¡;;:¡:iE1~'~*,iiøìiz~~\Pi¡¡¡(i:.i1j¡!¡¡¡¡ Fn 1.e: :,E~ ',:: ~,:: :~~ ~m;;; ~~:;ti~~~~~~~'üK~i~~ ~;'~ ;;~~~::~=~=::::::;::: Y.2'~:::',e';'(V?"1)1P~~¿~!-t.~J9.1""ii,2; 7 >io'";3J9 ,':-"...2;;:". ,~~21:1ì'tÆi2,O?¡ß;;¡¡i;míwtlf~~)}!ìlI'?;ìi~1j\1íW¡jí:~i~~~m Pea~"~our~ac:or;P!-!c 1 C~ :,C;) ',::J 1.0: '::J 1,00 FJf'¿~~6¡:~(~~~;(,i?;~,;7;~ ~,~ !'~.; 1 ~~;:;'" - ~;~~?O8i;tt,<~;ì;.'r¡%it\\it1i¡li}!A11¡\l1!\~¡~'W1~*,'~,1Ié:!¡Zr';J.¥ii.~~g~ ÇQr,~~P"~~~~?¡~,~,,,;.~..~~ o-~..'.: ':'::.;:~~~;t!."':'.' ..~~ O~1Pøv~;1~~:í1',;ik:~~~r:'\;,í~£\~i~¡¡\TÞ~{!i~ii\~ Bus e'OCI<ages (./~'r) 2 2 0 2 2 0 i.íi:'!JlWi':e;¡;~~~.~~~~~,:.:<!-"", ....~, ;>e~...~"" .' '¡;4ii¡:gi{.;¡,¡i~¡¡¡¡f:.j~@:"j-;¡;;&&.'!~}B~~~~'î.'Jji?ì1_íi!'J&.¡tf~ P~ec'.~ P:-:ues" 2 $ ~;~,]f~~_S.!'.¡¡:;$$;~'~:",:;"A:¡!"¿~'2~';:7.' "';' Ac\ue!e<1G:een,G(s) 2'..~ 2~,~ gA,3 B4,3 ~. ~~r:~i~;7;m~;:~~(~; :;~:::!;;;;~~ ir: . ;~~~?~1j~1m~i¡!Z~:1i11\;;1¡í(f~I~&!{_~;~{~¡~!;{ill 9. ~~ r!!!!~ _.....~r¿. !U ~ ).\!'. ~d:S~O::~.~: C'y'~' 5:'J :Z~ !:C~:'" ~ :q-:j¡¡¡:J_'jI¡¡,!pffi~~~.4Ij¡¡~!w.4i!~~ti¡~~~);¡'{!}¿j Ve~id! Ex".e"!lo~ Is) 2.0 g 2,0 2,0 2 :) le~øßrp;,C.ep'.tY;~>'!f¡8..,i.328;' ") 27~ ,:;" '22 ',l.~ 3.43 :' '~ 2,5:)j~!1,"f,:,¡)¡jã1ít!!,!i.i:!f¡(f'¡:;¡I!\i§~.~!~~;1i'¡!'tJì~Iiw.~ vlsRe!!oP~~t cO,~7 02: :'1 Y1iJ3,á~~J'.e::;1.M-è¡:: ;~:<.r-.~,P}í, q ~C:~~Ç;T;~;;;'" :,~'œ.'ì'¡';'¡t~~~Th\:f,ii1Œr.R,it~\îIì~ti)§¡J~,%\;~i}~ vlc Re:lo 0,59 05: O?B 0,27 ~ 57 ~f":~\J.~!~.:.t;.;;-",~~~;;:::;-~~; r;;;';J975~5:~-:-" P~'esslo:!f8C',or 1.0: ,:: 0,5? 0,77 ~~e!,_:J!(.,,_e!!y,~~:z,ri'3:z3~2r-.~~~ ~~7,::;::~ f;'2Z~:,~ "", ':~ :>e!ayl') 69,2 59 B '9,5 . e ~J;r.::;e~,;.e.~:rIi:.~.>;.'::~"!!. E7::,":~E'~;~¡5~ :~: A';::: A:)~roec.~ Delli)' (S) 55.2 ~ ~ ,$ - - , ~ P ..'?ð., C!i J.:2~J!P'..~::: '=:- 3' : ~ ::~; ~ !:!,: :;;:"". 6~~"mt~;;;m¡h_~ÀtJ¡:_'wl~~ ¡0I!!:8 eq¡o¡r~ m I!I)! ~l ~¡¡¡m'¡¡¡"'~,1->1>~:.ì\1~g¡#~¡,¡aþjt"t ~.¡¡;j¡¡,'¡ffl4~~¡",,~~,~~t',¡¡~1Xmg,¡.-Ji.at\i fiC-'if&~~Ø~lC.p]!@Pl.L~z¡t~t.ìl~?~8;;j,21:~~~1ìJ::!c:M;~xè"O!LSery1t&;S,1f¡1fi1áéi\j¡¡\it{j[:\%.Cjf5!ìì1i1.WI-- HCM Volume to CapacIty NlUO 0,78 ~Ç!p.!\!..a¡q~s..L¡¡!!lg,W¡\~i'1!<;i;'1lli1~Si\1i1.~~¡§fij:o:r;¡~jtlrj\:äZ(S)';~Næ~'r¡&@_W19Â'II1Jff'¡;:*4i;'j¡:;~~!jß IntmectJon CapacIty UtIlIzation 86.6% ICU Level of Service D ~~~.rÞ.~Þ~íf¡lÀ<1j6ITi~¡¡"Th'!!j~!æV\;;;-¡¡;;fi,~~f)~:ßj¡¡¡Æì:"%:";¡r&~~Þ;!;i~~;,,!:~i;1ß1f:j;J;\?¡\~it:J;:.;i'N':~);¡:¡,1:'¡¡;;i~~i:1 ~X m:t - p PI en ammendmsntlSynchro12020 without Weyer Ext.syß 2/16/2004 Page 17 " "" .. ... . ø ø 1# . . . . II . . '. '~ GJ a ~ ~ -urn :t>X G)I mti5 "lQ~~ .--.. ~ '" \ ,- - - '" .. " - 222: S 320 St & 32 Av..§. ..)- MITIGATED. 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyerl1aeueer Way Ex1eMlon Study .- t '-. ¡ ~r'o,:..;.""'._~~..:;;,::~:, ":-.¡;~~~~&¡:¡~!J913j¡¡,\1'BB~¡i\',:>BJ.~:I!\$:ï.1Þ'1'kã*ti;\'lP'JW1î1))¡¡¡¡4\'í- ,e-eG-:¡":¡:'::.......",, 245 1238 6 1062 212 72 177 106 g~:~: "~;: f"';'~~:~:: 7~t6~~~:~~~~¥!;~~;' ';~:~~:~ ~~7.;~1~~~;,tr:;(:')ry~~~~'W.¡f!j~~ ~~~::~;:;~'=::".,~ ~~;~;l:~ ?:~;:~.~~~~~~;::~::~:~~~~;~ S~"!!ev ~'x' 7'-e'~ ,7% 30% 31% :~"-::::e:e "!:~~~7.:~~~¡¡~~jl¡i:t~;f:ì¡~i':f;11J:'" - f" ~ !!1~Y.~!iITi~~f<?1Y.9.5~t1),;p'~~.nUlecquElue Js,me.tere,~;by upstream signaL ,:: .';Ó;<:> , ~m ~)( m::I: ~:\Oz~"'comp Plan emmendmant\SynchrO\MITIGA TED. 2020 without Weyer Ex1..sy6 2/24/2004 Page 1 ~FF51 ~ 0 Þ-n,,'~, ~ ' , -- ., '" v " . "fl. . . ,. ø fI .. " cI ~',.',.-" WI' .. 222: S 320 St & 32 Av....§. ./: MITIGATED- 2020 WITHOUT Weyerhaeuser Way Extension Weyemaeuser Way Ex1enslon Stut1y " t '-. ¡ ~ .- "'t f" ~ ,-. - ~9èm eo tt1¡¡¡¡¡;"':¡'(!:111!'i!f¡j1Mtt t:.BU\mEB,Ji,,~E B 8¡¡¡¡NYB U;IKWBTtlîit'W8ßif~;N EI ¡¡'!f~%NB~ ~ R"~~:> EI !I~'Z.8BJ~ B B Lane Configurations'ltti< m ",., ' "'I Hi< 'I i< 'Ii<, ~!JI5IõW".(yP1ìþQ~H~lil:;~J@~ '9ð()!fj~¡;i.r!)'O\)""1.9öð¡¡-;¡~:~¡'MO 1900 ",;11)00,:'X1 gOO;my,9Oö~':~ Lane WIdth 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 G (a a¡.'(%Tq¡~~~.ih~\"&::<)~ %;~;¡~4}h~.7i[:¡T!:- ,"'O%¡¡7'!;;':~;;;fIT: :.: ::F '" 3 W'.' ,~. '""",: '~""'1;'J)'Æ>~~ Total Lost time (s) 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 L"štIê'.Pt1l"I.iíClOr;$~;¡;;'~fr~~::J1;Œr,OO",.' 0:9'1:",::"';;.j'v:::1 :00' 1;00 '-'c': """:'~~;OO7,;¥~"~:;"*~ Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0.99 1,00 1,00 rlpb'~þ'i;d!6rf(e~.!rt})¡!~f.;:r\'Q-qmJtJ~:'jy.:~.f;'ÖÖ:' 1.0o";,,:r"'~:f,Oö' . .1.00 ',."1:0Ö':'lf.1:00:~~ Frt 1,00 0,99 1,00 0,98 1,00 0.97 1,00 0,92 F'fF~rõfe¿fíiilW;¡nf7C~'O:9'5'1'1"X1;OO'limm7\1r'¡"ð'9S' ':00""'" '~""O,1)5' '1.00' ". ""O:95:7!:i1J~)"':'~J S~~~, ~1"w(C'::'~' 1770' A825 , '~7: "':~ 1782 1772 1755 1'653 "~ r:~"'ii'",;~~~:!' ':--: ',' O,95-71:00:-:"-'~--~:95 ~.C:) -',0:'95,,1:00 '::O:g5'!Ëif;oo;r~ s.~~, F~::w Cpe.",) ~770 -825 ~-7" .~:g ~782 1772 1755 1653 ~;;~-:;o~~:;:;:;::"~~r:ft:12~;,:;.\1t~~:?\:~, .:;:; .,9;;.' ;1,g":::i2¿§i:!'1:~¡":Ft6~H¡;;~~~f~'ft~~~ A1!;:'~ow (;;-::~í"':"i"-:-:':'.~245':::n¡¡2-:'~: M";"i'" e ,~5:'-,':,~ 12":::21'2.¡:"¡;,'::SO1.,:i\:'12'f.;*,rZ.7;!-ñ'~:ii:õ~()1:; La~è"Gr~~JO F';w(;"'~)' 245' :239"~ 0 ' 5 ":52 .. ~ 2'12' "'72 .'^ ó" "177' 106Ò :W~r>~'~q!l.~'m"i::-;T:.~";7JqT:~~C'-,-' ':'" -,~:>'- :-::'.~~:~fh:fki,:"9f¡10Y:f%¡~JO:?fM~1:O~~ "us e:<>c~a;eo (~!"r) o 2 :) :; 2 G 2 o 2 - 2 o 2 ;~;~~:~:t~~~;~~"'~~::"":,Proi'lW¡:r.~::::":".r-~~:,,~';!;': 5 2 1 6 Offi~¡Er~!i1í5c,'";,',".:,;,.;~;~..:;:,,.'~'::~"~':~"',' ';':' ~'"::;.:-:T'77Jf~\þ'1';<ix1t?iA¡~~ÌØ'ì~1m'5L(f;t~ ,AC~~":.~ G-cen. G Co) 23.7 69,6 2,0 "'-,9 18.4 8,3 19,1 9,0 E:"c-t'.'v"'O',,ëi7!nš) ;~3:7;;:g6:(\". .: ' ~-~:.-:- ~,~ ,"" 44', g"':"'~,::-': l~r4J!,~1a¡~fß?',û"ßI9}1mg,o!?~:!.... ,\c~~e!e~g!C Ra~~ 0,2:) G,57 ~:2 ~~9 :),16 0.07 0.16 0.06 ::::~Ï!;ä~'cë;:-;:";;:¡š~~5.o:",,"':.5,o::-,:_"~~'i~:-5:0::':' 5:0":""'-""';~~'ffiìj:5~~~.~;0Jt.,"\S~'9.iì~m V"~:c!e Ex'.e~olc' (0) 2.0 2.0 2 C 2,:) 2,0 2,0 2,0 2.0 La~9:.Gr",~p (V;>h»,~",,3-32':i2nt.!~;"':'-'I' '3~" ~95~ :;:""",':;:';2a,~ií\:¡¡m:!2h:¡¡j1+*(!:;¡-:¡~28~~1ì:~;2,~~ v'oR.:'oPro: cC,14 0.26 co:: cO,22 cO.12 0.04 0.10 cO.06 v!(Rã!lo pe'rm~;'¡'~ '-:~~,:L..:>-'.¡,;,:\~~~t~;:.. :." ,,<;"'~:-";::;:~~~::íf¡¡¡:RS'\:?~~;::;§};:~ V:CRAI;O oee 0,A5 O,~D 057 0,750.57 0,610.83 P~'E~~,Dc'QY;ën,:';<7'!7.42.~¡¡,~~~:, ,;,,;":,5g:2 "c'28':":"':':"'".;.,~2:1~Q~~;Z)i.~..- Pco;;-ess'on ~ec~c' :),8A 0,64 ':7 ~ gg . ,00 1,00 0,97 0,91 r~tfé~ë!'i:ä';)e!n'i~d2 :~~3:e-~:5':r.~7,-' r.~ .: ".~,2 . ::'":~~:~9;1'~'i:z.3;4\t;;¡¡¡'~¡;~~ji~¡mi;¡2,~ CO'"V (s\ 39,3 9.5 5~ 2 28.' 55,7 55,5 46,3 80,1 t:e'Vé':-c'.se?it'~~?:::~;~~:.":::;~O:;~~'"7 7"":!:'.., ;:'C"':">;~',!;;""E§:g:"~Ej:3)",iJf;',!l't~.o5~~ Mo'~ac~ DelAY (oj 1A,4 29,3 55,7 :::rL~:9 t-'ipw.'ê~:lOS 1.;~::~;::;~,:.7':~';::",~ B,.::,"';'",~;=:::,;, ::-,,::;:ç.~:';:':::~::':¡;'Ìi'iÎÌi}¡i~;E;¡-¡;'Ìi<"\\UQ'í'JL~ 1) H H'èM Volume to Capacity ratio 0,66 ~~!ffi'(i ¡¡ß~~I§.;g:.~?;.!',~& SûH\~;r5;,¡r:tli!ì.e ;m~;: ( :::¡ ";~fr Intersect/on Capacity Utilization 85.4% ICU Level of Service ê'::;:C~!1ëätt:à1lë",G1:OOþ~¡lJ:ij:¡¡¡;'¡¡1f¡í?~r~i¡,!."LP",;;.L? :;f'r:~')"-"';~,..:Z ~-~.,-",." "';~r' , ! _. .~r~ .' M:\02\02282\Comp Plan ammendmant\Synchro\MITIGATED. 2020 without Weyer Ex1..s-ya THETRALVl3-FF51 2/2412004 Page 2 ... fi ,. EXHIBIT' ,~.~- , : PAGE__- &f . .11-1- Attachment B: Travel Time Summary Sheets (EXHIB~T~ :P AGE 3l- 0 F-U- , , '. ' , ','" . .. 7" f1?1 '7"'" 'ill ?J""" ~ ?J 'iJ 1J 1êJ 'iJ-",,~'ë)-"JI 'I~." 813 ¡} ¡-a- ¡-- ~ - Travel Time Summary (without MItigatIon) Roadway Speed Distance Running Time Int. Delay (s) Total Travel Time PM HB wlo Link WeyerMueser Wy: 500' south to 320th . I 35 I 0.095 9.7 52.7 62,4 320th: Weyerhaueser Wy to 32nd - mph 0,150 15,4 30,4 45.8 32nd: 320th to 1,500 South of312th 0,25 25.7 0 25.7 !Totals 0,495 50.9 83.1 I 134.0 PM SB wlo LInk I 35 I 32M: 1,500 South of312tht0320th , mph 0.250 25,7 63,7 89.4 320th: 32nd toWeyerhauserWy 0,150 15,4 18.0 33,4 WeyemaueserWy: 320th to 500' south 0,095 9.7 0 9,7 ITotals 0,495 50.9 81.7 I 132.6 I PM HB \'.17th Link I 35 I Weyemaueser Wy: 500' south to 320th mph 0,095 9,7 53,2 62.9 320th: Weyerhaueser Wy to 32M 0,150 15,4 20,5 35,9 32M: 320th to 1,500 South of 312th 0,25 25,7 0 25.7 ITotals 0.495 50,9 73.7 I 124.6 PM SB \'.17th Link I 35 I 32nd: 1,500 South of 312th to 320th mph 0,250 25.7 4.5 30,2 320th: 32nd to Weyerhauser Wy 0.150 15,4 47,6 63,0 Weyemaueser Wy: 320th to 500' south 0.095 9.7 0 9.7 ITotals 0.495 50.9 52.1 I 103.0 500' south 500' south 1 500' south I Î +- 1. 500' I ¡ south -urn »X G)I mrn ~ ~ J. I ...;. ... Without LInk " " WIth LInk 4: r '-r"...r~-.."'¡j -' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ t-t-t- t- t, t t t t t t I-I t t t I-I,m . jiiii1i'i:iiiiiii:jiifi'i:iiiiiiiii::']i¡:¡ii::ii:i::iiii::iii::¡iifA1hiil¡¡p;!!:'!:::ii'!::":':['ii::i':¡:':¡:::i;:i:i: PM NB w/o Link . Weyerhaueser Wy. 500' south to 320th - [ 35 t 0.095 9.7 52.7 62.4 320th: Weyerhaueser Wy to 32nd - mph 0.150 15.4 28.1 43.5 32nd: 320th to 1,500 South of312th - 0.25 25.7 0 25,7 ¡Totals . 00495 50.9 80.8 131.7 I PM :am ~)( i;~ ""- .'=0 0 ~ b,o ... .. Travel Time Summary (with Mitigation) Speed Distance Running Time Int. Delay (s) Total Travel Time sa w/o link [ 35. ] 32nd:1 ,500 South of312th to 320th - mph 0.250 25.7 46.3 72. 0 320th: 32nd to Weyerhauser Wy - 0.150 15.4 20.0 35.4 Weyerhaueser Wy. 320th to 500' south - 0.095 9.7 0 9.7 [Totals 00495 50.9 66.3 I 117.2 J ,"1J m »X G)I m- I ~ ~~~ ~ i".""" ~.i .;- I r City of Federal Way PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting . """ H" . ;~4 .;:: April 21, 2004 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers MEETINCì MINUJ!~S CommIssioners present: John CaulfÌelcL Hope Elder, Dave OsakI, Dini Duclos, B1I1 Drake, and Grant Ncwport. CommIssioners absent: Marta Justus Foldl (excused). Alternatc Commissioners present: Lawson Bronson, Tony Moore, and Merle Pfeifer. Alternate Commissioners absent: Christinc Nelson (unexcused). CIty Council present: Deputy Mayor LlI1da Koehmar and Coune1l Mcmber Jeanne Burbidge. Staff present: Community Dcvelopment Services Director Kathy McClung, COn1l11Unlty Development Services Deputy Director Greg Fewins, Scnior Planner Margaret Clark, Associate Planner Isaac Conlcn, Assistant City Attorney Karen Jorgensen, Traffic Engineer RIck Perez, Contract Planner Janet Shull, Jones & Stokes Gregg Dohm, Jones & Stokes Lisa Grueter, and Administrative Assistant E. Tina Piety. Chair Caulfield called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ApPROVAL OF MINUTES It was IiIIvIc to adopt the AprIl 7. 2004, mll1utes as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT None COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC IIEARING - Potential Annexation An'a (PAA) Subarea Plan Mr. Conlcn delIvered a presentatIon on questIons r~lIsed at the last publIc hearIng. It was stated that a development agreement is an optIon for the RabIe property. PUBLIC IIEARING - New Frecwa~' Commercial Zoning Classification Ms. Shull delIvered a presentatIon on questIons raIsed at the last publIc hearing. Because the Commission wanted to know what parcels this proposed zonll1g could be applIed to, she showed a map o[thc current wnlng in the areas considered for this proposed Wlllllg classIfIcation. Ms. Shull commented that i[this zonIng classIfIcatIon IS approved. any owner wlshll1g to apply thIs proposed zone to their property would havc to go through thc City's ComprehensIve Plan Amendmcnt proccss. PUBLIC HEARING - 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Quadrant Site-Specilìc Request Ms. Clark dcli vcred the stall report. CommissIoner Ncwport recused hlmsel [ from the Quadrant site- speeifìe request. This IS a request to delete a proposed road [rom the Federal Way Co/llprehellsive Plan (FWCP). The road in question is an extension of Weyerhaeuser Way. The City Council required the K \l'b"'HH~ C"HH"¡Ssr".,\2004\Mcc,...1' SHH""HY O.I~ ,o, '¡"c EXH\B\T PAGE. 2- ,-- I Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 April 21, 2004 applicant to prepare a traffic study analyzing the effects of deleting this street from the comprehensive plan. The study concluded that no roadway improvements would be needed by 2020 as a result of the proposed action. Due to this proposal, Mr. Perez asked the Commission to consider amending the comprehensive plan to make 32nd A venue South a principal collector from South 320lh Street to approximately South 3161h Street. The meeting was opened to public testimony. Commissioner Duclos informed the Commission that she had spoken to Steve McNey and encouraged him to bring his comments to this public hearing. Wally Costello - Applicant for the Quadrant request. He explained their proposal for the parcels the road would pass through and showed how the road would be detrimental to the proposed project. There are wetlands on the property that will restrict development and a road would restrict it further. I Joanne Kirkland - She spoke in opposition of the Jackson request She stated that the map in the staff report shows 312lh as a through street (from 3200 to Military), but it is not. The report also says that a grocery store would decrease the amount of traffic in the area, but how could adding retail decrease the amount of traffic? She also commented that she recently learned that the P AA process has been going on for some two years, but this is the first she has heard about it She is concerned that annexation would raise taxes and services would go down. This is a safe area for children and she is concerned that will change. Chairman Caulfield asked if King County mailed a notification of the P AA Subarea Plan to those within the P AA? Ms. Grueter rep lied that the issue was on the King County website, but for the most part, the City of Federal Way mailed the notifications. A notification had been sent in the utility mailings. Charles Gibson -- He spoke his support of the Northlake request and said he was available if the Commission had any questions. Cindy Cope. - She spoke in opposition of the Jackson request. She feels there is no need to bring more retail into the area. There is a lot of available retail space in Federal Way, such as the vacant theater and empty spaces in the Mall and Ross Plaza and SeaTac Village, etc. This area is a very private neighborhood that is safe for children to ride their bikes. Opening 32nd would bring more traffic, which would make it more dangerous for children to ride their bikes and would bring in more crime. Steve McNey - He is the Jackson property manager. They want Community Business (BC) zoning because they feel they can best serve the neighborhood and the City with that zoning. They are not trying to compete with the downtown core. A grocery store in this area would decrease traffic on 3201h, would proved a tax base to the City, and would provide a service to the neighborhood. They have submitted a docket to King County asking for a zoning change to commercial business. Kristen Wynne - She spoke in opposition of the Jackson request She feels the proposed Freeway Commercial zone is not compatible with existing uses. If a car dealership were to go into the area, it would mean more lights and noise. She commented that 320lh is already a disaster area on the weekends. A more intense traffic study should be done before a decision is made. In addition, in terms of aesthetics, a car dealership at the entrance to Federal Way is a step in the wrong direction. K:IPlanning Comnission\2004IM<dÍl1g Summary 04-21-04.doc EXH'B'T PAGE 1 2. ,.J Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 April 21, 2004 Public testimony was closed. It was lIl/slc (unanimous) to recommend adoption of the Neighborhood Business comprehensive plan designation and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning for the Davis P AA site-specific request. It was ill/sic (unanimous) to recommend adoption of the Single Family, High Density comprehensive plan designation and Single Family 9.6 zoning for the Northlake P AA site-specific request. The Commission discussed how the owner of the Rabie P AA sit-specific request could utilize a development agreement. Mr. Fewins infonned the Commission that annexation of this area is not anticipated in the near future and the owner plans to develop soon. It was m/s/f(one yes, four no, one abstain) to recommend adoption of the Neighborhood Business comprehensive plan designation and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning for the Rabie P AA site-specific request. The Commission expressed concern over downzoning the property. It was l1l/s/f(three yes, three no) to recommend adoption of the Single Family, High Density comprehensive plan designation and Single Family 7.2 zoning for the Rabie P AA site-specific request; with the stipulation that the Planning Commission feels strongly that a self- storage/mini-storage use would be an acceptable use on this site. After further discussion, it was concluded that the Rabie P AA site-specific request would go forward with no Planning Commission recommendation. It was m/s!f(one yes, five no) to recommend adoption of the Community Business comprehensive plan designation and Community Business (Be) zoning for the Jackson P AA site-specific request. It was m/s/c (four yes, two no) to recommend adoption of the Office Park comprehensive plan designation and Office Park (OP) zoning to the south part of the Jackson P AA site-specific request, and Single Family High Density comprehensive plan designation and Single Family RS 9.6 zoning to the north part of the Jackson P AA site-specific request. It was m/slc (five yes, one no) to recommend adoption of the staff recommendation for the New Freeway Commercial Zoning Classification. It was l1l/s/c (unanimous) to recommend adoption, with the aforementioned changes, of the staff recommendation for the P AA Subarea Plan. It was m/slc (four yes, one no, one excused) to recommended adoption of the staff recommendation for the Quadrant site-specific request with the amendment that 32nd Avenue South, from South 320th Street to approximately South 316!h Street, would be reclassified from a minor to a principal collector, it would use Cross Section "0," Map III- 6 would be modified to reflect this, and 32nd A venue South from South 320lh Street to approximately South 316th Street would replace Weyerhaeuser Way as Map ID #35 on Table III-I 9. The PubTic Hearings were closed at 8:55. These items will be seheduTed for the May 3,2004, City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee, which will meet at 5:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADJOURN . The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. EXHIBIT PAGE3 2- )~3 K:\Planning Commissionl2004\Mccting Summary 04.21-04.doc MEETING DATE: July 20, 2004 ITEM# yc f) ..,.,.".--..,""'........""""'.'..'..."."...."-.."""---- '......"."."...".""".'.".""..-.."'."........, ......,-....,......--.,.........,-............. .....--..,.........,..,...,.,-.......,.,...,........,.----, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE, CONCOMITANT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN CATEGORY: BUDGET IMP ACT: [g CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [g ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ,...,.."."......"".'...."...-.........,....,...-....... ......,.........--,.....,.,..,......... .,..,..........-,.......--,.,.................,..--"'--""'....... ...............,....--............,.....-........--.. --..,....,......................., A TT ACHMENTS: Adoption Ordinance, revised Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan, revised Findings and Conclusions, Amended Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Amended Zoning Map, redline changes to Agreement and Findings and Conclusions. ----.........................,....'.--..,..........-.....,..,.--....'.................,......--...,...,. ......."-"....'...."..--'......... .........'.'."'..-.."'--."'..'....".-............,...... SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The City Council held a public hearing for the Christian Faith Center (CFe) Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone, Development Agreement and Development Plan on May 24, 2004 at which time presentations were given and public comment taken. The City Council continued the hearing to June 15,2004, at which time the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance approving CFC's application for first reading on July 6, 2004 and 2nd reading and enactment on July 20, 2004 and to meet with residents of 18th Avenue South to address street improvements on 18th Avenue S. The Concomitant and Development Agreement and the Findings have been revised to reflect a modified street section on 18th Avenue South based on discussions with the residents on 18th Avenue Sand CFc. .--...,........-........,..,.......,...... ...,..,.....,.......................' '..'...".-........'..'...............,.-,.".'....-.'.............,.,-,_............,..,....., ......,........,......,.".,....--... .................................--.,., CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A ......,.,.....,.,.,..-----,...............,.,........----,......... .""""--""",.",-..-.-...",."".,."........"...""..,.....,, .................,.,......,...,..--..,..,.--.,.,...,....-.-...-........------- --...,...........-......,..... ---......-..-.-....,., ......"'."""-.'.""".--.. ......."-""'-........,........, PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of the proposed Ordinance and revised Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement. ~~:;~-:::~~~~~~.. -- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # ~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASIDNGTON, RELATING TO LAND USE, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING FOR 49.97 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF S. 336TH STREET BETWEEN PACIFIC IDGHW A Y SOUTH AND INTERSTATE 5 FROM BUSINESS PARK (BP) TO MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 3600 (RM 3600), AND ADOPTING AN ASSOCIATED CONCOMITANT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Chapter 36.70A RCW or "GMA") requires the City ofF ederal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use element (including a land use map), housing element, capital facilities plan element, utilities element, and transportation element (including transportation system map[s]); and WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations implementing its comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its comprehensive plan with land use map (the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the comprehensive plan, land use map, and zoning map on December 23, 1998, September 14,2000, and November 1,2001; and March 27,2003; and WHEREAS, under RCW 36. 70A.130, by December, 2004, all jurisdictions within Washington State must take action to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive plan and development regulations to ensure that they comply with the GMA; and WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Article IX, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC); and ORD# ,PAGEl WHEREAS, under RCW 36.70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to continuing review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year; and WHEREAS, the Council shall be considering three separate actions to amend the Plan, all of which will be acted upon simultaneously in order to comply with RCW 36.70A.130; and WHEREAS, these actions include adoption of a Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan, which will replace Chapter 8, Potential Annexation Areas of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and address certain comprehensive plan text changes pertaining to the Community Business (BC) comprehensive plan designation and zoning; and WHEREAS, these actions include deletion ofthe planned extension ofWeyerhaeuser Way South, north of South 320th Street, shown on Map III-27B from the Comprehensive Plan and deletion of this project from Table III-I 9 (Regional CIP Project List); and WHEREAS, these actions include a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM 3600) through adoption of an associated concomitant and development agreement and development plan for 49.97 acres located south of S. 336th Street between Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5, referred to herein as the Christian Faith Center Property; and WHEREAS, in 2000, the City of Federal Way accepted requests for amendments to the text and maps of the comprehensive plan and applications for site-specific changes to the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map, and considered amendments to the text and maps of the comprehensive plan and to the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map, including a request to change the Christian Faith Center Property from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM 3600); and WHEREAS, on July 4, 200 I, the City SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance on the proposed Plan and zoning map amendment; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1660, development agreements associated with a comprehensive plan designation and related zoning change may be used at the City Council's discretion, where ORD# , PAGE 2 the project is larger in scope and has potentially larger impacts than normal, or where the City Council may desire to place certain restrictions on the proposal; and WHEREAS, A Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement has been prepared for the proposed project on the Christian Faith Center Property (the "Project") in order to fully address and mitigate all identified impacts associated with the project, and the Concomitant Agreement allows for a rezone of the property but limits the allowable use of the property to a church, a school, and accessory uses, and the Agreement is accompanied by a Development Plan (Exhibit B to the Agreement) as required by FWCC Section 22-1669, and prepared in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1664; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A), the City issued Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) for the Project on November 18,2003, and March 3, 2004, and EIS Addenda on April 16, 2004 and May 21, 2004, and four public meetings were conducted during the environmental review process for the proposed Project which included an EIS Scoping Meeting on August 27, 2002, Neighborhood Traffic Meeting on May 8,2003, Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) hearing on December 12,2003, and City Council EIS briefing on March 15, 2004; and WHEREAS, the proposed Plan and zoning map changes address all of the goals and requirements set forth in the GMA; and WHEREAS, the proposed Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan address all of the goals and requirements set forth in the FWCC; and WHEREAS, the City ofF ederal Way, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council committees, and full City Council has received, discussed, and considered the testimony, written comments, and material from the public, as follows: 1. The City's Planning Commission considered the request for amendment to the comprehensive plan at public hearings held on July 18,2001, August 15,2001, and September 19, 2001, following which it forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and ORD# , PAGE 3 2. The Land Use and Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the proposed site-specific changes to the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map on October 1,2001 at which time it requested a development agreement and development plan be prepared for the Project; and 3. The full City Council considered the proposed change to the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map and the associated Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan on May 24,2004, and June 15,2004; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the changes to the Plan's land use map and City's zoning map and associated Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan; Now, THEREFORE, the City Council ofthe City of Federal Way, Washington, does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. A. The proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan land use map, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, reflects new or updated infonnation developed since the initial adoption of the comprehensive plan. It bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; is in the best interest of the residents of the City; and is consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan. The amendment, as mitigated, is compatible with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods and will not negatively affect open space, streams, lakes or wetlands, or the physical environment in general. It will allow for growth and development consistent with the Plan's overall vision and with the Plan's land use element household and job projections, and/or will allow reasonable use of property subject to constraints necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas. It therefore bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare; is in the best interest of the residents of the City; and is consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan. , PAGE 4 ORD# B. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map, set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto, adopted pursuant to the concomitant agreement, is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan and the comprehensive plan land use map proposed to be amended in Section 2 below, bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, and welfare, and is in the best interest of the residents of the City. C. The Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan, as set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto, is consistent with RCW 36.70B, RCW 43.2lC, and FWCC Chapter 22, Article XXI. D. Additional Findings and Conclusions are attached as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Adoption. The 1995 City of Federal Way comprehensive plan, as thereafter amended in 1998,2000, 2001, and 2003, including its land use element map, copies of which are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby are and shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 3. Zoning Map Amendments Adoption. The 1996 City of Federal Way Official Zoning Map, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, 2001, and 2003 is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit B, pursuant to the Concomitant and Development Agreement, and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 4. Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan Adoption. The Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan, attached as Exhibit C, is hereby adopted and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 5. Amendment Authority. The adoption of Plan amendments is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541. The adoption of the Concomitant and Development Agreement and Development Plan is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapter 36.70B RCW and pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article XXI. ORD# , PAGE 5 Section 6. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 7. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and 1996 Zoning Map, as thereafter amended in 1998, 2000, 2001, and 2003 shall remain in full force and effect until the amendments thereto become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance. Section 8. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date ofthis ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ,2004. day of CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Mayor, Dean McColgan ATTEST: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE No: K: \CF C\Documents \Adopti on Ord inan ce ORD# , PAGE 6 ORD# , PAGE 7 ExmBIT A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP .-t-. puget Sound ~, ""--1. COM PREH ENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS I~I . Federal Way City Limits I \ ' Potential Annexation Area - City Center Core - City Center Frame - Corporate Park m;~~,~~~ Office Park Professional Office - Commercial/Recreation Business Park - Neighborhood Business - Community Business - Parks and Open Space - Multi-Family c:J Single Family-High Density Single Family-Medium Density c:J Single Family-Low Density 0 1 Mi~ ~ I Map printed June 2004 1u8enIIerI~1rg.8TII EXHIBIT B ZONING MAP ORD# , PAGE 8 .+. I puget Sound '.. " ..,,-- ZONING MAP ", Federal Way City Limits ,. # Potential Annexation Area Single Family Zones ~ SE - Suburban Estates (1 unit/5 acres) Œ::::J AS 35.0 - (1 unit/35,OOO Sq. Feet) 0 AS 15.0 - (1 unit/15,OOO Sq. Feet) 0 AS 9.6 - (1 unit/9,600 Sq. Feet) 0 AS 7.2 - (1 unitl7,200 Sq. Feet) - AS 5.0 - (1 unit/5,OOO Sq. Feet) Multi-Family Zones c:z:;¡¡ AM 3600 - (1 unit/3,600 Sq. Feet) - AM 2400 - (1 unit/2,400 Sq. Feet) III AM 1800 - (1 unit/1,800 Sq. Feet) Office Zones - PO - Professional Office OP - Office Park 0 OP-1 - Office Park 1 D OP-2 - Office Park 2 EZJ OP-3 - Office Park 3 G OP-4 - Office Park 4 CP-1 - Corporate Park Commercial /Business Zones - CC-C - City Center Core ~ CC-F - City Center Frame - BC - Community Business - BN - Neighborhood Business Business Park Zone BP - Business Park 0 1 Mile ~ I Map p1nIed June 2004 lu8eI8Ieltl8lGpl'lllflfo': 8II'tI EXHIBIT C CONCOMITANT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN ORD# , PAGE 9 CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND THE CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CHURCH AND PRIVATE SCHOOL JULY 20, 2004 The City of Federal Way ("City") and the Christian Faith Center ("CFC"), a Washington nonprofit corporation, collectively referred to herein as "the Parties", enter into the following concomitant agreement and development agreement ("Agreement") regarding the rezoning of certain property and the scope of permissible development, use, and mitigation of environmental impacts associated with the campus development of a church and private school ("Project"), through construction of the buildings and related improvements on the CFC property. The agreement is both a concomitant agreement and a development agreement. The concomitant agreement allows for a rezone of certain property subject to development standards and conditions governing the use of the property. The development agreement provides the developer with certainty regarding the local regulations and mitigation requirements that will govern development for a specified project. The concomitant agreement is a condition to and limitation upon the rezone of the property, if adopted by the City Council. That is, if the site is rezoned subject to concomitant agreement, its use and development is restricted both by the regulations applicable to the new zoning classification and the provisions of the concomitant agreement, and where development standards in the agreement are more restrictive, they govern property development. The development of the property is conditioned and limited by both the development agreement and concomitant agreement, and they have been combined into one document. 1. Location. CFC is the owner of certain real property situated in Federal Way, Washington, located south of South 336th Street between SR-99 and Interstate 5 (the "Property"). The Property is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Project Description. The Project consists of development of a 218,500 square foot building for church sanctuary/school auditorium/administrative services a 101,526 square foot private school building, and associated parking and recreational and athletic fields as depicted on the Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Plan" or "Development Plan"). 3. Concomitant Agreement. If the Property is rezoned from Business Park (BP) to RM 3600 by the Federal Way City Council, CFC and the City agree that the Property may be developed only in accordance with the standards and mitigation set forth in the Agreement. The Property shall be developed as described in the Agreement, and as depicted in the Development Plan. The allowable use of the property shall be limited to that described in the Agreement. All development standards, including mitigation, identified in the Agreement shall apply to Property development. No development on the Property shall be inconsistent with the Agreement or City Code. The Property is subject to the Agreement, and shall be developed only in accordance with the development standards identified within the Agreement, including the Development Plan (except for minor modifications permitted by Section 10 of the Agreement), unless and until the Agreement is amended or rescinded, as authorized by the City. 4. Development Agreement. The Agreement is authorized by RCW 36.70B.170 through .210 and FWCC 22-1660 through 22-1680. It addresses Project development standards, which are defined in the statute to include, for example, impact fees, mitigation, design standards, phasing issues, review procedures, vesting issues, and any other appropriate development requirements. \ The Agreement provides the City and CFC with certainty as to the type of Project that will be built, the type of mitigation that will be provided, and the development regulations to which the Project will vest. The Project is consistent with current local regulatory requirements.2 As authorized by state statute,3 the Agreement identifies mitigation under City codes and the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 43.21 C RCW, "SEP A") required for the project. 5. Vesting. City development regulations, as found in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) or otherwise legislatively adopted4, and the mitigation measures adopted herein shall govern the Project for a period of five years, dating from execution of the Agreement. Any amendments or additions made to City development regulations during the five year period shall not apply to or affect the development, except as otherwise provided, or if other county, state or federal laws preempt the City's authority to vest regulations. The City reserves the authority to impose new or different officially adopted regulations to the extent required by a serious threat to the public health and safety.s After the five-year period, amendments or additions made by the City to these development regulations and the mitigation measures adopted herein shall apply to any subsequent or further development of the Property. Otherwise, the Property and the uses thereof that are developed consistent with this Agreement shall be deemed legal, nonconfonning uses. Provisions of the Agreement, including specifically identified development standards and mitigation measures, do not tenninate after the five-year period and continue to restrict development of the Property unless and until amended by the City. 6. Project Mitigation Under SEP A. The Project has been subject to detailed environmental review. A Final Environmental Impact Statement ("FEIS") was issued on March 3, 2004 and addenda were issued April 16, 2004 and May 21, 2004. Mitigation of significant adverse environmental impacts imposed under SErA, through the City's SEPA regulations, is incorporated into the Agreement. 7. Development of CFC Property. 7.1 Pennitted Uses. CFC covenants and agrees that it will limit any use of the Property to the church and school uses, as depicted in the Development Plan, attached as Exhibit B. Both the church and school are classified as principal uses for application of FWCC Sections 22-671 and 22-674. Accessory uses shall be limited to those approved as a part of this Agreement and shown on the attached Plan or List ofPennitted Accessory Uses, attached as Exhibit C, or any accessory use detennined by the Director of Community Development Services to be allowed, or analogous to an allowed accessory use, in the RM 3600 zone. 7.2 Relationship Between City Development Regulations and Development Standards Identified in Agreement. Development Regulations include all provisions of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), including without limitation FWCC Chapters 18 through 22. The Development Regulations for the Property include those applicable to the RM 3600 zone and as 1 RCW 36.708.170(3). 2 RCW 36.708.170(1). 3 RCW 36.708.170(3)(c). 4 Legal requirements include legislatively adopted standards governing development, such as zoning, building and development regulations, impact fees, SEPA regulations and substantive SEPA policies, and other laws, ordinances or policies. 5 SeeRCW 36.70B.\70(4). 2 set forth in the Agreement. The Agreement establishes site specific development standards, including mitigation. Property development shall be consistent with both development regulations and the development standards identified in the Agreement. Where the development standards in the Agreement are more restrictive, they shall govern development of the Property, as specified herein. 7.3 Construction Phasing. Project construction shall be limited to two phases. Phase One shall comprise construction of the building for the church sanctuary, auditorium, meeting rooms and administrative offices, and the first 81,323 square feet of the school building, together with all on-site and off-site improvements required by this Agreement and by the conditions of any related permit approval. Phase Two shall comprise construction of a future second-story 20,203 square foot addition to the school building. Each phase, with the exception of improvements completely within the interior of a building, must be substantially completed within twenty-four (24) months of issuance of the building permit for that phase, except for delays beyond the control of CFC and approved by the Director of Community Development Services which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Project construction shall be completed within five years of the execution of this Agreement, except for delays beyond the control of CFC and approved by the Director of Community Development Services which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 8. Settlement Agreement. The Parties shall be bound by the Settlement Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Federal Way Industrial Park, Inc., dated February 5, 1996, attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference. The Settlement Agreement provides certain development standards and other provisions applicable to use and development of the Property, which are consistent with the terms of this Agreement. The terms of this Agreement shall control over any inconsistent terms in the Settlement Agreement. 9. Development Standards, Including Mitigation. The Project shall be consistent with all specified development standards. CFC shall construct, install or implement, as part of Project Construction, all mitigation required by the Agreement. The City Council has reviewed the EIS and the record. Mitigation has been developed based on these documents. 9.1 Project Design and Site Configuration. 9.1.1 Building Setback. All site improvements shall be setback from South 336th Street a minimum of 50 feet. The property bordering South 336th Street shall be deemed the front yard for purposes of this Agreement. Remaining rear and side setbacks for the church building shall be 30 feet from any property line or right-of-way. Remaining side and rear setbacks for the school building, ball fields, and any playground equipment shall be 50 feet from any property line or right-of-way. 9.1.2 Building Height. The maximum allowed height of single-story elements of the church building is 35 feet above average building elevation (ABE), with up to three additional feet allowed for articulated cornices; the maximum allowed height for second- story elements containing offices, classrooms, library and similar uses is 40 feet above ABE. The maximum height of the school building is 40 feet above ABE with up to three additional feet allowed for articulated cornices. The maximum allowed height for the church sanctuary/school auditorium portion of the building and the gymnasium is 55 feet above ABE. 3 9.1.3 Landscaping. CFC shall provide an approved landscape plan, prior to issuance of the Phase One building permit, incorporating the following features. The landscape plan shall be prepared by a landscape architect in consultation with a habitat biologist, whose recommendations shall be incorporated into the plan. 9.1.3.1 Perimeter Landscaping. CFC shall provide a combination of existing and new native landscaping to accomplish Type III landscaping along all property lines and public rights-of-way and access easements. Along South 336th Street, landscaping shall be 50 feet in width consisting of 25 feet of a combination of Existing Native and Type III landscaping and 25 feet of Type N landscaping. Along all other property lines associated with that portion of the Property containing the church, landscaping shall be 15 feet in width consisting of 10 feet of a combination of Existing Native and Type III landscaping and 5 feet of Type N landscaping. Wetlands and wetland buffers which are vegetated in accordance with a City approved wetland mitigation plan and landscape plan and which are in excess of fifty (50) feet between the development and the property line shall be deemed to have satisfied the landscaping requirements of that property line. 9.1.3.2 Detention Pond Landscaping. Landscaping around detention ponds shall comply with the approved landscape plan and include at a minimum provision for dense bank cover and trees larger than the minimum required by FWCC to provide shade and reduce water temperature. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "larger" means deciduous trees larger than 3 inch caliper and evergreen trees taller than eight feet. 9.1.3.3 Habitat Retention. CFC shall provide a fifty (50) foot wide wildlife corridor from the west wetland to the east wetland with small animal culvert crossings under proposed roads and water ponding areas along the wildlife corridor, at a spacing of approximately 200 feet, to provide drinking areas for small animals. 9.1.4 Parking. 9.1.4.1 Setback. Parking shall be permitted within the required side and rear yards, but not within 10 feet of any property line associated with the school or within 15 feet of any property line associated with the church or within any required buffer. 9.1.4.2 Number of Stalls. CFC shall provide a minimum of 1,406 parking stalls and a maximum of 1,540 parking stalls. 9.1.4.3 Parking Dimensions. Maximum parking lot and stall dimensional requirements shall be equivalent to corresponding minimum FWCC requirements except as modified by the attached Exhibit E. 9.1.4.4 Overflow Parking/Special Events. Overflow parking shall be permitted only pursuant to a parking plan approved by the Director of Public Works. CFC 4 shall develop and submit a plan for approval by the Director of Public Works prior to special events to manage overflow parking through an arrangement with an appropriate transit provider or local hosts for shared use of additional off-site parking spaces and shuttle transportation connecting the overflow parking areas and the site during special events or in the event of recurring overflow parking conditions. CFC shall be responsible for all costs associated with traffic control including, but not limited to, flaggers, police officers, signs, and shuttle transportation. 9.1.5 Size Limitation. 9.1.5.1 School. The school structure shall be limited to 101,526 square feet, including 81,323 square feet in Phase One and 20,203 square feet in Phase Two, as depicted in the attached Conceptual Floor Plan, Exhibit F. The day care shall be located in the main church/sanctuary/administration building and shall be limited to 33,000 square feet. Based on these maximum square footages, total enrollment of the school and daycare shall be limited to a maximum of 900 full- time students. 9.1.5.2 Sanctuary. Sanctuary occupancy shall conform to all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations and shall not exceed 4,500 occupants. 9.1.5.3 College. The Dominion College shall be considered an accessory use to the church and as such shall primarily serve CFC students and staff and members of the CFC congregation. The Dominion College shall be limited to 23,000 square feet as depicted in the attached Conceptual Floor Plan, Exhibit F. Based on this square footage, enrollment shall be limited to a maximum of 225 students. 9.1.5.4 Recreation Areas. Exterior recreation and play areas shall be provided in a minimum amount of 27,026 square feet in the school yard, a minimum 100,000 square feet in the recreation/sports field, and 4,613 square feet in the church day care area. Such minimum areas shall be permanently maintained as recreation and play areas. 9.2 Operational Limitations. CFC operations shall be consistent with the schedule and restrictions listed below. Changes in the below schedule, which was provided by the applicant, shall be reviewed under FWCC 22-1680 to ensure that the project remains consistent with the review completed under SEP A and the FWCC. Minor modifications may be approved by the Director of Community Development Services, as specified in FWCC 22-1680. 9.2.1 Church Service Hours. Church services shall be limited to one weekday evening service (typically on Wednesdays) which shall not begin before 6:30 p.m. and Sunday church services shall be separated by at least one and onelhalf hours between services. 9.2.2 Dominion College Hours. Dominion College classes shall not be held on weekends or between the hours of noon and 6:30 p.m. weekdays. 9.2.3 Bible Study Hours. Bible Study classes shall be held only weekdays before noon. 5 9.2.4 School Hours. School classes shall be completed no later than 3:30 p.m. daily. 9.2.5 Holiday Services/Special Events. Holiday services and special events shall be scheduled consistent with the approved Traffic Management Plan (TMP) required by 9.4.12 and consistent with 9.1.4.4. 9.3 Construction Mitigation. 9.3.1 Erosion Sediment Control. CFC shall designate and provide an onsite Erosion Sediment Control (ESe) Supervisor approved by the Director of Public Works, who possesses a Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Certification by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). This ESC Supervisor shall be available for the duration of the project. The qualifications and responsibilities of the ESC Supervisor are outlined in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City of Federal Way Addendum. The Director of Public Works may further limit clearing and grading activities on the site based on recommendations from the ESC Supervisor and requirements of the KCSWDM. 9.3.2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. A construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided by CFC and reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of any construction permits or authorizations. Construction phasing shall be included in this plan. CFC has proposed several BMP's which shall be captured in the SWPP plan including, but not limited to, confining refueling and equipment maintenance to a hard-surface staging area with spill containment features and a spill clean-up kit, and pipe slope drains used to convey storm water over steep slopes. 9.3.3 Clearing and Grading. Clearing and grading shall be allowed only pursuant to a phased construction plan approved by the Director of Public Works. Clearing and grading shall occur only between May 1 and September 30 unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. 9.4 Traffic Mitigation. CFC shall perform, as part of Project construction and prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy unless otherwise noted, the following traffic mitigation as required and approved by the Director of Public Works. 9.4.1 CFC shall reconstruct 18th Avenue South from the existing berm to S 344th Street to a modified street section, consisting of 24 foot wide street with vertical curb and gutter, 5-foot sidewalks, and two additional street lights mounted on existing power poles, consistent with the attached Exhibit G-1. Traffic calming elements shall be installed, including 2 speed humps, 1 crosswalk, bulb outs at the intersection of 18th Avenue South and S 341 st Street and 18th Avenue South and S 344th Street to narrow the throat width of 18th Avenue South to 20 feet, and street signage shall be installed to address no through truck traffic, children playing, speed humps, crosswalk and speed limit. 9.4.2 CFC shall improve S 344th Street from 16th Avenue S to 18th Avenue S consistent with the attached Exhibit G-2. Construction shall consist of Type R Street. The north side shall consist of a 40 foot wide street with curb and gutters, 4 foot planter strip with 6 street trees, 6 foot sidewalk, and street lights. The improvements shall be tied into the existing improvements to the west end of S 344th Street to the east side of the intersection of S 344th Street and 16th Avenue S. On the south side, only curb and gutter shall be required. CFC shall construct improvements within existing right-of-way. 9.4.3 CFC shall improve S 344th Street through the intersection of 16th Avenue Sand shall signalize the intersection of S 344th/16th Ave S consistent with the attached Exhibit G-3. CFC shall construct improvements within existing right-of-way. 9.4.4 CFC shall construct street improvements consistent with the attached Exhibit G-4 to signalize the intersection of SR 99 and S 344th Street and provide a westbound-to- southbound left-turn lane within existing right-of-way. If delays beyond the control of CFC and the City prevent the completion of these improvements by the time of issuance of certificate of occupancy, CFC may obtain a certificate of occupancy subject to the Public Works Director requiring temporary traffic control measures for up to one hour following the end of each Sunday service until such time that the traffic signal is operational. 9.4.5 CFC shall perform a sight distance study, propose a conceptual intersection plan for the intersection of 20th Avenue S at S 341 st Street to be approved by the Director of Public Works, and construct improvements as determined by the Director of Public Works. 9.4.6 CFC shall construct street improvements along S 336th Street consistent with the attached Exhibits G-5 and G-6. The improvements shall be consistent with Type M street between SR 99 and 20th Avenue S, consisting of an l8-foot half-street with curbs and gutter, 6-foot planter strip with street trees, 8-foot sidewalk, street lights, underground utilities, and 3-foot utility strip. Improvements will be consistent with Type K street between 20th Avenue Sand 1-5, consisting of a 22-foot half-street with curb and gutter, 6- foot planter strip with street trees, 8 foot sidewalk, street lights, underground utilities, and 3-foot utility strip. A continuous two-way left-turn lane shall be provided between SR 99 and Forest Lane Town Homes frontage. Curbs and gutter, planter strip, and sidewalk shall also be provided on the north side between South Garden Court condominiums and Forest Lane Town Homes to tie into the existing improvements. An eastbound right-turn lane shall be provided on S 336th Street at 20th Avenue S, consisting of a 100-foot storage length and 50-foot taper length. These improvements may be modified by the Director of Public Works to minimize impacts to wetlands or minimize right-of-way acquisition. 9.4.7 CFC shall improve 20th Avenue S for a distance of 225 feet (175 feet of storage and 50 foot taper) to the North of the intersection of S 336th Street and signalize the intersection consistent with the attached Exhibit G- 7. 9.4.8 CFC shall construct an eastbound right turn lane from S. 336th Street to 20th Avenue S. 9.4.9 CFC shall construct traffic calming elements on 20th Avenue S from S 336th Street to S 33ûth Street, including traffic circles at S 33ûth Street and S 33Znd Street and an island diverter at S 336th Street to prevent northbound and southbound through movements, and construct a sidewalk on the east side of lOth Avenue S from S 336th 7 Street to tie in to the existing sidewalk, consistent with the attached Exhibits G- 7 and G- ß. CFC shall construct improvements within existing right-of-way. 9.4.10 CFC shall provide two transit shelters, shelter footings, litter receptacle pads, landing pads and benches, one located on 20th Avenue S in the existing location north of S 336th Street and one located on S 336th Street as determined by City staff with input from King County Metro and Pierce Transit. 9.4.11 Upon a one time request of the Director of Public Works, CFC shall develop and implement Sunday peak hour timing plans, based on turning movement counts for signal timing plans collected by CFC for the intersections of 20th Avenue Sand S 336th Street, SR 99 and S 324th Street, SR 99 and S 330th Street, SR 99 and S 336th Street, SR 99 and S 340th Street, 16th Avenue Sand S 344th Street, and SR 161 and S 34Sth Street. 9.4.12 CFC shall implement a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) for the Project as approved by the Director of Public Works. 9.4.13 CFC shall pay to the City Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and No/lOO Dollars ($350,000.00) to expand the City's existing project at the intersection of S 34Sth Street and SR 161 to provide for the construction of a second northbound right-turn lane with 550 feet of storage. Payment shall be made one year after receipt of the Certificate of Occupancy for Phase One of the Project or upon award of the bid to construct the turn lane whichever shall occur first. 9.4.14 CFC shall pay to King County its pro rata share contribution to the King County Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) project at South 320th Street and Military Road in the amount of Six Hundred Forty-Seven and No/lOO Dollars ($647.00). Except as provided above, CFC shall use its best efforts to acquire any and all right-of-way necessary to complete the improvements described in this Agreement. If, through no fault of CFC, CFC is unable to acquire right-of-way necessary to complete the improvements described, the City and CFC agree to meet and confer on possible alternatives. The Director of Public Works may modify the required improvements as necessary provided impacts are mitigated. 9.5 Payment of Pro Rata Share. CFC shall pay, prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy for Phase One of its construction as defined in this Agreement, its pro rata share contribution to impacted City Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects, identified and calculated below: 0 S 34Sth Street: 9th Ave S - SR 99: $60,500 0 S 356th St: 1 st Ave S - SR 99: $50,200 0 S348thSt@lstAveS:$13,100 0 S 336th St @ 1 st Way S: $3000 0 12th Ave SW / SW 344th St Extension: SW Campus Dr - 21st Ave SW: $38,700 0 1st Ave S: S 320th St- S 330th St: $7600 0 21st Ave SW Extension: SW 356th St - 22nd Ave SW: $2800 0 SR 18 @ SR 161: $24,800 0 S 336th St @ 9th Ave S: $1100 8 0 S 320th St @ 1-5: $34,100 Total $235,900 9.6 Surface Water Mitigation. The following storm water mitigation, as required and approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be designed by CFC prior to issuance of construction permits or authorizations and constructed by CFC prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 9.6.1 CFC shall design and construct the east basin storm water detention pond to meet Level 2 flow control standards. 9.6.2 Consistent with the Process IV Hearing Examiner Decision, CFC shall design and construct all runoff from the Sanctuary roof for the 2 year storm event to be collected and dispersed through percolation trenches to maintain wetland hydrology in the westerly wetland. 9.6.3 CFC shall design and construct all surface water treatment facilities from the East and West I subcatchments to include the use of Stormwater Management@ filter vault systems which meet or exceed Resource Stream Protection standards. 9.6.4 CFC shall design and construct storm water discharge facilities entering into wetlands or buffers as percolation or infiltration trenches and discharges to wetland buffers in a dispersed manner consistent with the Process IV Hearing Examiner Decision and as approved by the Director of Public Works. 9.6.5 CFC shall provide, prior to issuance of Building Permit, an Integrated Pest Management Plan as described in the Ecology Stormwater Manual (Ecology 2001). This source control BMP shall outline control of fertilizer and pesticide application, soil erosion, and site debris, and include the use of pesticides/herbicides only as a last resort. 9.7 Wetland Mitigation. CFC shall comply with all conditions contained in the Process IV Hearing Examiner Decision dated April 23, 2004 and attached hereto as Exhibit H. 10. Other Project Review Processes and Minor Modifications. 10.1 Other Project Review Processes. The Project will be subject to building permit review and other applicable review processes. The final design of the buildings and other improvements, precise location of building footprints, location of utilities, determination of access points, and other design issues will be determined during that process and must be consistent with the Agreement. 10.2 Modifications. Minor modifications to the Plan may be approved by the Director of Community Development Services and processed in accordance with FWCC 22-1680. Factors to be considered by the Director of Community Development Services when determining if a modification to the Plan is minor include but are not limited to the following.: a. Activity changes (excluding change of use of the principal use or expansion of accessory uses as specified herein) or increases in square footage of gross floor area as defined by 9 FWCC section 22-1 that do not result in significant additional or modified trip generation or distribution. b. Changes in the location or number of access points that do not impact traffic safety or modify trip distribution. c. Requests for modification of landscaping pursuant to FWCC 22-1570. d. Removal of significant trees in conjunction with other actions deemed minor. e. Addition of fewer than twenty parking stalls outside of areas containing "significant trees" as defined by FWCC. f. Exterior changes that do not significantly add to or alter approved architectural design. g. Actions that do not result in impacts to the environment pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act requiring issuance of a mitigated threshold determination of nonsignificance. h. Actions that do not require review by the hearing examiner. A modification is not minor if the Director of Community Development Services determines that there will be substantial changes in the impacts on the neighborhood or the city as a result of the change. Modifications that are not minor modifications are major modifications and shall require City Council approval pursuant to FWCC 22-1680. 11. Waiver and Mutual Release of Claims of Invalidity. The City and CFC acknowledge and represent that the terms of this Agreement have been jointly negotiated and that each party enters into this Agreement voluntarily. Further, CFC and the City agree that this Agreement is authorized under law and each party waives any claim that the Agreement is invalid or illegal. The agreements and representations in this Section are material to this Agreement and are being relied upon by both parties. 12. General Provisions. 12.1 Binding on Successors. 12.1.1 The Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their successors in interest, and may be assigned to any successor in interest to the Project property. 12.1.2 This Agreement is intended to protect the value of, and facilitate the use and development of, the Property and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the City. Therefore, the covenants set forth herein shall be construed to and do touch and concern the Property and the benefits and burdens inuring to CFC and to the City from this Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon CFC, its heirs, successors, and assigns, and upon the City. 12.2 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Venue for any action to enforce the terms of this Agreement shall be in King County Superior Court. 12.3 Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. 10 12.4 Authority. The City and CFC each represents and warrants to the other that it has the respective power and authority, and is duly authorized, to execute and deliver this Agreement and that the persons signing on its behalf are duly authorized to do so. CFC further represents and warrants that it is the fee owner of the Property, that it has authority to agree to the covenants and provisions contained herein, and that there are no other persons, entities, or parties with any fee interest in the Property. 12.5 Amendment. This Agreement may be modified only by written instrument authorized by the City Council and duly executed by the City Manager and CFC, and their successors and assigns consistent with FWCC 22-1679; provided, however, notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, the City of Federal Way may, without the agreement of CFC, adopt and impose upon the Property restrictions and development regulations different than those set forth herein, if required by a serious threat to public health and safety. Moreover, as provided in Section 5 of the Agreement, five years after the date of the execution of the Agreement, the City may elect, without the agreement of CFC, to apply development regulations in effect at that time to any development within the scope of the Agreement that has not been completed at that time. 12.6 Exhibits. All exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein. 12.7 Headings. The headings in this Agreement are inserted for reference only and shall not be construed to expand, limit or otherwise modify the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 12.8 Integration; Scope of Agreement. This Agreement and its exhibits represent the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. There are no other agreements, oral or written, except as expressly set forth herein. This Agreement does not set forth all conditions applicable to the Project to the extent that additional conditions may be imposed as part of any permit issued by the City, as required by the Federal Way City Code as determined by the discretion of the Directors of the Departments of Community Development Services and/or Public Works. 12.9 Enforcement. Subject to the notice and cure provisions of this section, in the event either party fails to satisfy any of its obligations under this Agreement, the other party shall have the right to enforce this Agreement by an action at law for damages or in equity for specific performance. The Parties acknowledge that damages are not an adequate remedy for breach by either party. In addition to the remedies set forth herein, in the event of a breach of this Agreement by CFC, the City may enforce this Agreement under the enforcement provisions of the Federal Way City Code in effect at the time of the breach and/or it may terminate this Agreement and take action to amend the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation of the Property. No party shall be in default under this Agreement unless it has failed to perform its duties or obligations under this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice of default from the other party. A notice of default shall specify the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which the default may be cured. If the nature of the default is such that it cannot be reasonably cured within thirty (30) days, then a party shall not be deemed in default if the party commences a cure within thirty (30) days and, thereafter, diligently pursues completion of the cure. 11 12.10 Attornevs Fees. In any action brought to enforce this Agreement or for damages resulting from a breach thereof, the prevailing party as determined by the court, shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees. 12.11 Police Power. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to diminish, restrict or limit the police powers of the City granted by the Washington State Constitution or by general law. This Agreement is an exercise of the City's police powers, the authority granted under RCW 36.70B.170-.210, and other laws. 12.12 Recording; Assignment. The Agreement shall be recorded with the Real Property Records Division of the King County Records and Elections Department. 12.13 No Third Parties. The Agreement is made and entered into for the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. No other person or entity is an intended third party beneficiary. No other person or entity shall have any right of action under this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunto placed their hand and seals on the day and year indicated. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington municipal corporation CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, a Washington nonprofit corporation BY: BY: David H. Moseley, City Manager Casey Treat, President Date: Date: A TrEST: This - day of ,2004. N. Christine Green, CMC Federal Way City Clerk Approved as to Form for City of Federal Way: Approved as to Form for Christian Faith Center: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson Brian Lawler Lawler Burroughs & Baker, PC 12 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. ) COUNTY OF KING On this day, personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, Casey Treat to me known to be the President of CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, a Washington non-profit corporation, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal this - day of ,2004. (notary signature) (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires: K: \CFC\documents \c fcdevagrOnO04 13 EXHIBIT A . TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPERTY PER CHICAGO TITLE CO. ORDER #553764 PARCELS 1-6,8-9,11,12-13 & TAX LOT #59 IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 21, T21N, R4E, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TAX LOT #59 PER STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED REG. #9706091592 THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR SOUTH 341 ST. PLACE BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER NUMBER 84101/0/57, SAID INSTRUMENT BEING A RE-RECORD OF INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8111020670. EXHIBIT B TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN ui NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION TRACT r <Ii ~-- PARKING STALLS PROVIDED: 1,406 -1,540 in AS OF: MAY 10,2004 -------~1St..P. -.L-~ // /"=-=- -~~-;;;---- - ------------ '\ ~~ Abbey Road EXHIBIT C TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LIST OF PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES Christian Faith Center - Chart of Uses §f___~ 1,§~fi~l"t1,~å¥FIf{§tF#Ql~lt~, ' '.":". ' . Sanctuary/School Auditorium (Includes Stage) 4,500 Seats Multi-purpose rooms Bookstore with Café Youth Church (Multi-purpose rooms/chapel) Children's Church (Chapels, classrooms) Daycare Music Area - Choir Room (Room behind stage) Other Areas (Storage facilities, mechanical rooms, computer/phone room, TV/audio department, baptismal, kitchen, distribution center, hallways, facilities offices, wedding chapel, meeting room, bathrooms, etc.) Dominion College (Classrooms, offices) 4:',',W:13 33,054 S,H I 1'94 3,702.16 14,095.82 == C15,.4.[3-~1 9.~) --, == _!LS6~:60 I 1,772.37 60,292.97 2,581.72 1st Floor Sub-total 166,903.00 LSANCTUARY~~.d F~OQk ."" -'-"- "--"-'-'--- ._-"._._._-"~"-- "~ Dominion College (Future multi-purpose rooms, classrooms, library and staff offices) 2nd Floor Sub-total Grand Total 21,06282 18,288.96 12,24:5.22 ----"-~'- 51,597.00 218,500.00 SF Administrative Offices Other Areas (Storage facilities, Hallways, Bathrooms, etc.) L£HR"$11AN~H~ÇHØØ!- . ..;', .' Christian Faith School (Private School) 900 Students Sub-total Total 101 ,~57(;ì() 101 ,~jLli.OO 1O1,52GOO EXHIBIT D TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 19 ~. . "'o;-'~~::(;;~'hJ '...::"," ." c. ~ .., CO BETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") made this 5~ day of (drV4rj-, 19~, by and between the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and FEDERAL WAY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "FWIP". WHEREAS, CITY commenced a Petition for Condemnation in the King County Superior Court under cause #95-2-19577-6; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto have reached an agreement settling all claims in that condemnation action; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The CITY OF FEDERAL WAY shall be granted an irrevocable, exclusive arid permanent easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibi t "I'I and incorporated herein by this reference (ff Easement ff) granting to the City the free and uninterrupted use over, across and through certain real property (fIProperty") located in Federal Way, King county,'Washington and legally described in Exhibit "A" to the Easement. The City's rights shall be exercised, upon that portion of the Property legally described in Exhibit "B" to the Easement (" Easement Area.") 2. In consideration of the grant of the Easement by FWIP to the CITY and upon execution of this Agreement and satisfaction of the contingencies set forth in Paragraph 17, the CITY shall pay to FWIP the sum of Fi ve Thousand and no/lOa Dollars ($5,000.00) simultaneously with the recording of the Easement. - 1 - «:; (Q) ~Q) ìf (') (- ORIGINAL J:\C06125\HI5005\OOO29307.3 Exhibit ",II" , -attached hereto, and by this reference fully incorporated ("Wetland Buffer' Area"). The Wetland Buffer Area shall be applicable to all future developments on the Property. 5. FWIP shall be allowed by the CITY to handle storm water retention/detention for any project on the Property, by constructing, in compliance with then-applicable codes (which as of this date are found in the King County Surface Water Design Manual) and at its expense, such conveyance systems as are reasonably necessary to provide for direct gravity flow drainage of storm water from the Property, to the storm water facility which the CITY is constructing on the Easement Area, so as to eliminate the need for storm water retention/detention on those portions of the Property which naturally drain to the Easement Area. FWIP'S right tò allow such drainage shall be limited to waters which currently naturally drain to the Easement Area and shall be limited to the initial development of the Property and shall not be extended to any redevelopment of the Property. "Initial development" shall mean the initial development of each phase of all of the Property. 6. The CITY agrees that the Easement Area may, at the option of FWIP, be included in any calculation of open space required for the development of the Property. The Easement Area may, at the option of FWIP, also be included in computing maximum lot coverage for development of the Property. Nothing herein shall relieve FWIP from complying with the City's landscape or other requirements for development. 7. The CITY shé\l~pay'~ë,all:j)/¡costs~relab~d'" td:obtaining' ~~PP¥()Yq-W~1~9.¡::~and_,,~<:t~velôþTnc~f?trtlie'r:EasemenQt~ea:, as a storm water $0..."."."'--... - - J - J:\C06125\Ht5005\OOO29307.3 w . , ~ ~esbn:Shali""" be, reasonable 1n. :comparison-,";cto':::-;other..:;:}simi"lar.',:,~. ( ;o~: a ~s , ~ u:~' t:: t th e requ ~~ tis" "at used to circumv en t th e spirit of this prov1s1on~ 11. CITY staff will support a proposal through lot line limination to combine lot 2 and lot 3 of the short plat recordéd ~der King County Auditor #811030086950 as to be considered as one "- ~ <). :1) lot for development purposes. 12. CITY staff will support an application by FWIP to extend the parking lot improvements on lot 4 of the short plat recorded under King County Auditor #8110300869 into the Wetland Buffer Area up to the western toe of the slope of the berm forming the western boundary of the retention/detention facility, provided, that appropriate mitigation, determined pursuant to city codes, such as planting on the edge of the berm, is provided by FWIP. To the extent that the city staff requests mitigation for the loss of Wetland Buffer, said request shall be reasonable in comparison to other similar proposals, such that the request is not used to circumvent the spirit of this provision. 13. CITY staff will support a variance, pursuant to city codes, . from the required lot size for. lot 4 of the short plat recorded under King County Auditor #8110300869 .toallow development of building improvements on said lot due to the limitations on the ~. ability to 'combine lot 4 ;with Jother.lots:..of:the,shorL,plat. 14. CITY staff will support parking lot improvements in the portion of the Wetland Buffer Area south of the roadway of lot 2 of the short plat recorded under Auditor #8110300869. with appropriate ~itigation costs, pursuant to City codes, to be provided by FWIP. - 5 - J:\CO6125\HI5005\OOO29JO7.J 17. The obligations under this Agreement are conditioned upon and subject to final approval of this Agreement by the city Council of Federal Way. 18. This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between these parties. Any prior.understanding or representation of any kind preceding the date of this Agreement shall not be binding on either party except to the extent incorporated in this document. 19. It is agreed that this Agreement will be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the Laws of the state of Washington. 20. Any modification of this Agreement or additional obligation assumed by either party in connection with this Agreement shall be binding only if evidenced by a writing signed by each party or an authorized representative of each party. 21. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 22. Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Agreement, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be binding upon and lnure to the benefit of their respect. i ve successors in interest and assigns. 23. In the event either of the parties defaults on the performance of any terms of this Agreement or either party places the enforcement of this Agreement in the hands of an attorney, or files a lawsuit, each party shall pay all its own attorney's fees, - 7 - J:\CO6125\H15005\OOO29307.3 .~~~.,,:- - ,INC.,: a Washington corporati?n,. who executed the foregoing . ument and acknowledged the sa1d 1nstrument to be the free .md lltary 'act and deed of said corporation, for the Uf;es dnd )oses therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was .horized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed the corporate seal of said corporation. affixed the day and 12 ~ +?&~~ NOTARY PUBLIC in and f~e state of Washington, residing at állj~ My appointment expires on (-~~rg ) ) ss. ) On this ~3r&. day of Fe brùClI'J' 19'16, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and f r the state of Washin~ton, duly commissioned and sc:.C?r~ terSo~allY appear~d J{Ö1"é:~ $. I iJ /)('1'3 to me known to be the .+ 14.1--14. -el, ~pcctHrcïy= of the C1Tx" OF FEDERAL WAY, a municipal corporat10n, who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the fn~e and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the use:...; ;111<1 purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first'~~Q~"written. -'<~\\ HU8/. 'ñ ~ -=-<v"..--""" \I& "~" ~ ~----- 0 . :: 4ìf~AR~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ g ~.+- NOTAR PUBLIC in and f the st te of ~ <8,\ PuauG Washington, residing at ~di1d ¡ Ld"a.1-' 'Ii -?l:.'", 1.~~5 My appointment expires on 1- ~1'-9:f ( . ',-(-' """"" :T 't"Of.:- WAS 7 STATE OF wk~H't-N'GTON ) )(Úuv ) ss. COUNTY OF -P-:I-EttCE- ~ vv' () ) On this g day of FEß£ v\~, 19 -.11, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the state of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Helmut Wallenfels, to me known to be the Senior Legal Counsel of WEYERHAEUSER COMP^NY I a Washington corporation, who executed the foregoing instrulnc>ol, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes the}"nin mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the - 9 - J:\C06125\HI5005\OOO29307.3 '0' ',,' . ' . .' ' , . '..' .', .< -- EXHIBIT I ~ . ,;:~' 1 '., ":~~¥þ.':. .~ FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE: federal Uay Industrial Park (Appl)cant's Name) HAIL TO: CITY OF FEDERAL ~AY 33530 1st ~ay South FEDERAL ~AY, VA 98003 ATTN: loodi K. Lindell PERKAHEMr ¡EXClUS (VI: EAS9ÐlT For aod in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valU<lbleconsideration, the receipt of \ffiich is Iwr"by ød:nowledged, Federal ~ay Industrial Parl::-("F~IP"), a \lashington corporation ("Grantor"), grants, Co(1\"Y. ,'od ~arrants to the CITY OF FEDERAL \lAY, a Uashington lIU'1icipal corporation ("Grantee") for the purposes 1"'1 . 1:11 t"c set forth a perpetual, exclusive and pennaneot easement.1.JI1CIer, across and over certain real prope¡iy (the "Property") located in Federal ~ay, \lashington, legally described as follO'.ls: legal Description of Property' attached hereto as:!,~~~ibir~A~ and incorporated herein by this reference.' . Except as may be othel>lise set forth herein, Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon that portion of the Property ("Easement") legally described as follO'.ls: legal Description of Easënìenf attached hereto as fxìi¡bî1~ã" and incorporated herein by this reference. ' 1. rPurpose. Grantee and its agents, designees and/or assigns shall have the perpetual, eKclusive aod permanent right. ~ithout prior notice to Grantor, at such times as deemed necessary by Grantee, to enter upon the Property to inspect, design, construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, remove, grade, excavate, ß~j enlarge all surface water. facilities including, but not limited to, U1dergrO<X1d facilities and/or syst",w, U[yx, aod/or under the Easement, together with all appurtenances thereto, including ~ithout limitation, ù'ltlet structures, control structures, pipes, catchbasins, manholes, retention and detention facilities, r>.)nL, biofiltration swales, water quality treatment facilities, vaults and ditches ("Facilities"). Following the initial construction of the Facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities or i¡rprovements as it may require. Grantee shall have the right to flood the Easement. In addition to the foregoing, Grantee shall have the right to engage in any and all activities as if Grantee owoed fee title to the Easement. 2. -Access. If reasonable access to the Easement is not otherwise available, Grantee shatl h~ve the right of aCcess to the Easement over and across the Property to eoabl e Grantee to exerci se its rï gh ts heran<kr. 3. obstrùctioos; landscaping. Grantee /MY remove any and all vegetation, trees, or other obstructions within the Easement, and may level and grade the Easement. 4. Grantor's Use of Easement. Except as hereafter provided, this Easement shall be exclusive to Grantee; provided, hO'.lever, Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement in ofÓer to coo-ply with City code requi[('¡1>'nts for opeo space, greenbelt or maJeif1U1l lot coverage; provided, h~ver, that such right does not include ("v! ¡il1J ~ïth the City's landscape code or other code requirements. Grantor may install, at its eKpensc 0'",1 111 coopl iance wi th all applicable la\.lS, such fad l i ties as are reasonably necessary to provide for dire<::t di scha¡-ge of storm water from the Property to the Easement after obtaining all necessary permits. Grantor's right to use the Easement for purposes of calculating open space, green belts or II\3Kif1U1l lot coverage shall not entitle Grantor to enter upon or disturb the Easement for any reason. Except as necessary to provide drainage facilities from the Property to the Easement, Grantor shall not perform digging, tunnelling or other form of construction activity on the Property, which would disturb the c~ction or Lr:\earth the Facil ities on the Easement, or endanger the lateral support to the Facilities. Grantor shall oat blast within fifteen (1'») !,'C'( of the Easement. Provided further as to the area described as "the East 175.5 feet of the North 30 (cd of tract X of King C<XX\ty Short Plat No. 281074 and the South 30 feet of the Easement area of lot 3 of the Plat," th i s Easement shall be non-exclus ive and Grantor or its successors or ass i gns may construct a road and connect to exist:ng utilities in snid area, if done in c~tiance ~¡th applicable codes. J:\C0612S\HIS005\OOO294S3.#2 ..' ~-¡:':"-."" '.",.:"",;.,,',.:;;";':. '. ,; ,;.;.~ti,')'.~,): ,';".~ ': :í¡¡i:~~~;' :.~.",r,,;l;i;~\,~, "-""';':i',~:'!::"", ";'~"',~I.:..' .' ,.. .. "0 .,- s. l~ff(C8tton. Grantor agrees to waive any GM all clallllS relatIng to any <ÚllMge to the Easement, Incluàì'ng~(höse-r'ésultlng from surface water flooding and further to indemnify and hold Grantee, Ita eleçted offIcIals, offIcers, employees, agents, and volunteers ha~less from any and all claims, demand" losses, actIons and liabIlitIes (Including costs and all attorney f~s) to or by any and all persons or entIties, Including, without lImItatIon, their respective agents, llcens~s, or representatIves, arisIng from, resultIng from, or connected with Grantor or Grantor's agents', employees', or Invltees' negligent actIons. 6. Successora and Assigns'! The rIghts and oblIgations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding l4JOO their respectIve successors' in Interest, heirs aM assIgns; provided, hO\.rever, that Grantor', right to discharge stonu.water to the Easement shall be lImited to waters whIch currently naturally drain to the Easement and ,hall only apply to the Initial development of the Property and not to any redeveloprœnt of the Property. All such redevelopment will be re<:flired to c~ly with all applicable laws and codes. "Initial development" shall mean the initial devel~t of each phase of all of the Property. 7. 1(0 EocutDrances. 'Graotor shall maintain the Easement fr~ of all encurorances and defects and (s prohIbited from recording or taking any action which results in the recording of any lien, enctI1Úrance or other defect against the Easement. DATED THIS day of , 1996. GRAM TOR GIWITEE fEDERAL ~AY INDUSTRIAL PARK Its: CITY Of fEDERAL \lAY By: Kenneth E. Nyberg Its: City Manager By: VEYERKAEUSER COKP~NY APPROVE{) AS TO fORK: By: Helmut ~allenfels Seni or Lega l CO\X\Sel Its: Landi K. lindell, City Attorney J:\C0612S\M15005\OOO2945J.#2 STATE Of UASHINGTON COONTY OF ) ) 68. ) 00 thfa - day of , 1996, before /lie, the lndersigoed, a Notary PLÒlic in and for the State of \lashlngton, dJlycOOtl1i&&Ioned and &1IOrf\, per~onallY appeared , to /lie known to be the of fEDERAL \lAY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC., the corporation that exeçuted the foregoing Instruaeot, am acm.:wledge<! the aRid Instruroent to be the free am volootary act and <ke<! of Gaid corporation, for the uses end purposes therein ~tioned, am on oath state<! that he/she was authorized to execute said Instruaeot am that the seal affixed, If any, Is the corporate seal of said corporation. \lITNESS my ham end official seal hereto afflxe<! the day am year first above written. (typed/printe<! name of notary) Notary PLÒlic in am for the State of \Iashington. My cOOtl1ission expires: COONn OF ) ) &s. ) STATE OF UASHINGTON 00 this - day of , 1996, before /lie, the I..Odersigoed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Uashington, duly cOOtl1issioned am SllOfn, personally appeared Kenneth E. Nyberg, to me ~fI<Wf1 to be the City Manager of the City of federal \lay, a \Iashington lIU1icipal corporation, the corporation that (~X" iu,i the foregoing instruaeot, am acm.:wledged the said instruœnt to be the free and volootary act and dc".,f f\id corporation, for the uses am purposes therein II1eI1tioned, am on oath state<! that he was authorized (0 (')(ecute said instfU1leOt. \lITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixe<! the day am year first above written. (typed/printe<! name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of \Iashington. Hy c()(ID¡ission expires: COONn OF ) ) &s. ) STATE OF \IASHINGTON 00 this - day of: , 1996, before /lie, the I..Odersigoed, a Notary PLÒUC' in and for the State of \lashington, dJly c()(ID¡issioned am &lIOm, personally appeared Helrut \Iallenfels, to /lie known to be the Senior legal <:«.nsel of \lEYERKAEUSER cœPANY. the corporation that executed the foregoing fnstn..rncot, and acknowledged the said fnstrunent to be the free end volootary ect sod deed of saidcorporatfon. for the uses and purposes therein cnentloned, and on oath &tate<! that he was authorized to execute saidinstruneot sod that the seal affixe<!, If any, 18 the corporate seal of said corporation. \lITNESS my ham am official seal hereto affixe<! the day am yeaf first above written. (typed/printe<! name of notary) Notary PLÒlic in am for the State of \Iashlngton. My cO<m\i&sion expires: J:\C06125\H15005\OOO2945J.#Z ""-":~.m~'?-~~it~\~~~~¡:::(;'f11"9'x~"b."""-" K.'*-.'-.~ J.."-;-;'t9'j~~W~" . .' : '.'¡. ;;t.:1'~f}~~~~~;~~~~~~~! .~~r~~,}~)lf.~"t:~:~;{{;'f~~~~': ¡<~¡~~~~~: ~J.; . ""'~;.' .', , :;-":-.'; EXHIBIT "Ate TO P ERHANENT I EX CLU S IVE EA.S EMENT PARCEL A: Lot 3, King County Short Plat No. 281074, according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. PARCEL B: Lot 4 of King County Short Plat No. 281074 according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. PARCEL C: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: " } Commencing at the northwest corner of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence south 89°13'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance bf 261.26 feet; t.hence south 00°14'39" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00°14'39" west a distance of 546.02 feet; thence south 89°13'33" east a distance of 399.45 feet; . thence north 00°14'39" eas~ a distance of 546.02 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89°13'33" west along said south right of way margln a distance of 399.~4 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 0: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in~King County, Washington, described as Enl1nw~' Commencing at the northwest corner of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; '.. thence south 89°13'33" seconds east along the north llne of sald northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 813.80 feet; thence south 00°14'58" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00°14'58" west a distance of 670.67 feet; thence north 89°16'45" west a distance of 153.10 feet; thence north 00°14'39" east a distance of 670.81 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence south 89°13'33" east along said south right of way margIn a distance of 153.10 (eet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County (or Soutll 336th Street under Recording Numbcl' CGO903037..2. EXHIBIT "A" TO PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT Pg. L 0 ( L ~~ ~::J~~i#£f1-'f"~::; i,~ ',' Pg. 1 of 8 nif71Júta..doc -; ",,:-/,.,:, ',' 'c", " ",,~; ri"{ ;,<",t',d',.. , '~':~('/'" , ~EGAL DESCRIPTIc. PROPOSED EASEMENT ACQursmoNs ON STRANICK-J"OHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9084 That part of Lot 3, King County Short Plat No. 281074, according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. Being described as follows: BegilliÛng at the northwest comer of said Lot 3 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, thence south 88° 15'52" east a distance of 162.06 feet; thence south 23"35'30" west a distance of 231.61 feet to a point on a non- tangent curve having a radius of 300.00 feet, thence along said curve to the right 32.63 feet through a central angle of 06° 13'56"; thence north 59°09'15" west a distance of 27.40 feet to the beginning of a curve having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence along said curve to the left 25,27 feet through a central angle of 04" 49'33"; thence north 01°44'08" east a distance of 175.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "B" TO PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT EXHIBIT "B" TO PE~~NT/EXCLUSlVE EAS~NT Pg. 2 of 8 ,lit: .,. w n:ryr.RAL WAY ?\JJ3UC VlOR] AD~O)-l DMSIO) 1 i I I i I ~ 1.,0, MI- 0.'" , . . ... . . .. "" T \..w:> &O<.H:) ....OY "'.".". ""OPtJITY l><$ .w:> IN;~r ry "'or HOT A RECORO O~ SURVEY FOR INI'ORMA TION ON!. Y " ';U¡ ...) ;;:;jjjõ, flRt \ \ .. - :~.:' -. ,;::., ::¥J:~\l\\~;ý.' . . .~ -.. I Pg. 3 0 ( 8 nú71/d'-'-doc . . , '. ~":.'::::~ ~:~?~1~W~~if~5~1~~~~~f:~*~}t?i~;- LEGAL DESCRlPTI( PROPOSED EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS ON STRANICK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9026 - ;. "~~+~;;f~ -" That part of Lot 4 of King County Short Plat No. 281074 according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, WM, in King County, Washington. Being described as follows: The North 30 feet of said LDt 4 Also The East L 40 feet of said Lot 4 Also The East 175.50 feet of the North 30 feet of Tract X of said short plat No. 281074. EXHIBIT "B" TO PE~/FXCLUSIVE F~SEMENT - ~ t-Q I t!~ ~H Otd ~H qH «) - H - t;3~ ~~ I . ,.,...x,-- ,," Pg. 5 of 8 otf721aJt>-doc . ;?~'<:\Yf;;¡-j:;',:.::; - !.. :,:¥':~~:.:> ':- ",;:"",_:,~~~-~,"':it;.~.'.~1i."~{;~~~.'.:.<:.~i:t .- . . 0"':"" '- '\ ':"~'i~?~:{:;"f1~"'1~{~~;~; LEGAL DESCRIFT..../N PROPOSED EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS ON STRANICK-JOBNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9067 That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M, in King County, Washington. described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter, thence south 89° 13'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 813.80 feet; thence south 00° 14'58" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89° 13'33" west along said south right of way margin á distance of 100.82 feet and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-, thence south 00° 14'58" west a distance of 181.30 feet; thence south 22°37'48" west a distance of 137.29 feet; thence north 00° 14'58" east to the south right of way margin a distance of 308.73 feet; thence south 89° 13'33" east along said south right of way margin a distance of 52.29 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.; EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County for South 336th Street under Recording Number 8609030322. Being a portion of the following described property: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M, in King County, Waslúngton, described as follows: Commencing at the 'northwest comer of said nortllwestquarter of the northwest quarter, thence south 89° 13'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 813.80 feet; thence south 00° 14'58" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-, thence continuing south 00° 14'58" west a distance of 670.67 feet; thence north 89° 16'45" west a distance of 153.10 feet; thence north 00° 14'39" east a distance of 670.81 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence south 89° 13'33" east along said south right of way margin a distance of 153.10 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County for South 33601 Street under Recording Number 8609030322. EXIlIßIT "B" TO - PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT '.',,;., :'f'" ';'.;;;., ~;r:" "..' , )"" Y!"'.".. ~1J1i;,...;... . Pg. 6 of 8 EXHIBIT "B" TO PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE EASEMFÆT , ~~r<' . '-' 1 '1 ., . ';.- . Pg. 7 of 8 o.úlll..IQdoc . <;::/ - """.",'....'. """-""'--,""r-."~"~~"..,."""..,,...,,., , """""""""""-"--',:"""'~."'.'~;:"'\'>'."."i.'.'~.'l'-'~t/"¡;i.'."'¡.~i.f..lrk~¡". .,.f .: '. "}:~"'. ,"'~:' >.',;,I,~":,;:,,~jé,j'~"'::"'t';::~~t;t:.{;,,,,~:~),~.,;.¡.:<~~~'fi.~ .<..:,.~~, LEGAL DESCRI:PTI, ' '-:-::""i:':.,\:~'r~.,t , ' .. '. " ." , PROPOSED EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS ON '.' .' " SI'RANICK-JOIINSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9069 That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said northwest quarter of the northwestquarte~ . thence south 89° 13'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 261.26 feet; thence south 00° 14'39" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00° 14'39" west a distance of 546.02 feet; thence south 89° 13'33" east a distance of 302_06 feet; thence north 22°37'48" east a distance of 255.66; thence north 00" 14'39" east a distance of 308.73 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89" 13'33" west along said south right of way margin a distance of 399.44 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Being a portion of the following described property: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence south 89° 13'33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 261.26 feet; thence south 00° 14'39" west a distance of30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00° 14'39" west a distance of 546.02 feet; thence south 89° 13'33" east a distance of 399.45 feet; , thence north 00° 14'39" east a distance of 546.02 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89° 13'33" west along said south right of way margin a distance of 399.44 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "B" TO PERMANENT/EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT ,.,_..:,:-_.. {Ô <D 01 ./' " ~ /" ,.. , «, ~ "~' :;::! .-/ : . :,>x .- ~ tú oq (» a HI OJ tú I ~~ ~bj OH t-4H q en - Htii ~ = ~.~ en I . . ~ ¿J~;tt(~Y~',~~EN. 0: o<::;:~~:'~t{\~\~'~W~<:~:;}tS~¡.~~:t,:i¡ì.@ft"~ .'.' . '0 EXHIB IT If I I tc TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION WETLAND AND SETBACK STRANICK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9084 That part of Lot 3, King County Short Plat No. 281074, according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East:, W.M., in Kinè County, Washington. Being described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Lot 3 and the TRUE POlNf OF BEGINNING; thence south 32°41' 52" west a distance of 78.31 feet; thence south 37°15'37" west a distance of 39.29 feet; thence south 40° 11 '22" west a distance of 50.40 feet; thence south 49°02'32" west a distanèe of 84.35 feet; thence south 67°33' 51" west a distance of 26.93 feet; thence south 45°20'35" west a distance of 9.06 feet to the south line of said Lot 3 and ( point on a non-tangent curve from which the radius point bears north 25°22 '36" east; thence along said south line through a 300 foot radius curve to the right, with a central angle of 05°28'06", an arc length of 28;63 feet; thence north 59°09' 19" west a distance of 27.40 feet; thence along a 300 foot radius curve to the left, with a central angle of 04°49'33 ", an arc length of 25.27 feet to the west line of said Lot 3; . thence along said west line, north 01°44'OS" east a distance of 175.99 feet to the north line of said Lot 3; thence along said north line, south8s015'52" east a distance of 259.45 feeUo the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 0.864 acres. ~;/l'&~,-:.:.¡'-;¡:""Z:':'~~~:;~.~ ," ~. ~~-........,",- '.... '! --.1~: G. t:-r7:-.... " f.: ~,?~').,.:.,..':t~.oê-~~ i¡ roo .!r."""""o<l"'" ~I 11',' <,.-: 0:: ,:-1.::.}:-", -- <. '" ~\ 'k~:-:.>' '-:-, ~i.~' ";;o;;~ \;:\ :; . ¡ "..; ,Ç'1" , ';':-' 11. ~ r:;:, ~¡~'" -' ,,' "~:~ f) r~; ~~;;~~~;¡~~~;y ~ r ~,,;. L<\¡-, ,,"" '.' ~ ." - -" ~.. .. t ~P:::::::S -"~~="i /? b- U '"'::--~~.,.,.,,-.....-,,.-..., r::/,...,I"""---C°.--:." '"-'.J..'~~~~ '_..oJ..~1.-' fwld9084.wp5 EXHIBIT "II" TO S EITL EMENT A G RE EMENT Pg. L of 9 1 <Ht -..... .., -HI I -..---..-..-\-..-..----.. , g D~ffi z ( ...0 ( o-i : :Þ . )o~~t~ ~~ ~ ~ B ~ ~o :. ;; g ~ ~~ 3 õ î ~ 00 g ~ -< r; z" 6 0" ~ ~ . z~ ~ tic r< 1;: ~'" 0( ~ >¿ " j;u ~ ;: 0;; :: .. ;-< .. ~ ~ ~ ... ~ .. = ~ l 1~ "-_-h ,.:¡:/~~v f, I-t;j OQ N 0 HI \D en txJ ~e ~E ZH H :: :>H <i1H ~ :: ~t5 ~ . '" .. . :>. <..}/{~(';;i,~;:i..~~<~-". ",:,..;..,',::, ,;.:~~~~;<.:{~.:. .. . '1. . LEGAL DESCRIPTION WETLAND AND SETBACK STRANICK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9026 That part of Lot 4 of King County Short Plat No. 281074 according to short plat recorded under King County Recording Number 8110300869, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East:, W.M" in King County, Washington, Being described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said Lot 4; , thence along the north line of said Lot 4, south 88° 15'53" east a distance of 116.96 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along the north line of said Lot 4, south 88°15'53" east a distance of 82.96 feet; thence along the east line of said Lot 4,'south 01°12'17" west a distance of 100.00 feet; thence along the north line of said Lot 4, south 88°15'53" east a distance of 140.00 feet; thence along the east line of said Lot 4, south 01°44'08" west a distance of 175.99 feet to the south line of said Lot 4 and a point on a non-tangent curve from which the radius point bears south 26°01 '09" west; thence along said south line through a 300 foot radius curve to the left:, with a central angle of 21°00'20", an arc length of 109.98 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve from which the radius point bears north 70°49'35" east; thence through a 100 foot radius curve to the right, with a central angle of 38°16'07", an arc length of 66.79 feet; thence north 45°55'34" west a distance of 40.72 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve from wruch the radius point bears north 07°40'45" east; thence through a 100 foot radius curve to the'right;with a central angle of88°34'17", an: arc length of 154.59 feet; . thence north 06°0S'23"east a distance of 49.78 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 0.716 acres. fwld9026.wp5 EXHIBIT nlrn TO SETTLF.MÐtr AGREEMENT Pg. J of 9 EXHIBIT "II" TO SETTL~NT AGREEMENT Pg. 4 of 9 I. j , 0 S &ð'\~'~J ( JUI' 0 S 0"11'" ~ I \00.00' 0 I S &ð'I~'~J ( I "'o,oQ' ~ 11).", ø ¿;IOI~~O-¡O \Ou.' ""~ \11 ø ',\00' 11,'" 6'¡I-I"07 ""~ ." 0 " H'H.¡' ~ 0'.'" ~ \~U,' ~ 6""¡0." "'~ 01' 0 i I 'V"V"'v'v....." 0 10 \00 1'0 ~ ' SÇ)¡.c .. ,cn ~~ II J»í... , "Ii.~" , ".." , '~;~,.;,', . , ; ,"",. "" ' ,. <t.". .' ... ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION WETLAND AND SETBACK STRANICK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9067 That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M" in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said northwést quarter of the northwest quarter, thence south 89° 13 '33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 813.80 feet; thence south 00°14'58" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89°13'33" west along said south right of way margin a distance of 27.58 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence south 12°03 '08" east a distance of 40.46 feet thence south 07°31 '30" west a distance of 41.08 feet thence south 04°45' 10" west a distance of 57,84 feet thence south 10°37'22" west a distance of 52.16 feet thence south 16°21 '59" west a distance of 56.28 feet thence south 10°58'46" west a distance of 43.83 feet thence south 23°54'07" west a distance of 14.53 feet thence south 07° II '32" west a distance of 38.28 feet thence south 21°58'46" west a distance of 37.77 feet thence south 08°3 I' 59" west a distance of 41.88 feet thence south 24°20'39" west a distance of 91.29 feet thence south 31°04'46" west a distance of 32.34 feet thence south 19°31 '25" west a distance of 20.75 feet thence north 00°14'39" east a distance of 546.07 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence south 89° 13 '33" east along said south right of way margin a distance of 125.52 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County for South 336dl Street under RecoÍ'ding Number 8609030322. Containing an area of L053 acres. Being a portion of the following described property: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence south 89°[3'])" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 813.80 feet; EXHIBIT "II" TO S ETTL EMEN1ì A GRE EME NT Pg. 5 of 9 .' " ,< . C" . , . . ," ';'h"'J""'~"""r,;",..,:..:,....'er1~:'-,,<';:~:-\~~i ':'~" <., ;:",:",' ," :";:i"'ý.:'. > :""';":~.'~7,~::,;.:: . ".," "':""'ì1"~"';:"¡:~'<":-::;~:":'{'-'\-':K;:-'¡¡<~?§~~~5~\,}J . ",'.,J: : "':.' , ¡, ,". "'..~.' -.,.c'.,;::,:;~~1\,:"~.';: j' thence south 00°14'58" west a distance of 30.00 feet to the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00°14'58" west a distance of 670.67 feet; thence north 89°16'45" west a distance of 153.10 feet; thence north 00°14'39" east a distance of 670.81 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence south 89° 13 '33" east along said south right of way margin a distance of 153.10 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County fOf South 336th Street under Recording Number 8609030322. Containing an area of 2.313 acres. fwld9067.wpS Pg. 6 of 9 EXHIBIT "II" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 2 EXHIBIT "II" TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Pg. 7 of 9 S '2.03'0, C '0,'" S 0)'31'30" HO,' S 0"<\'10 .., !1.8" S IO.J)'22 '0 82.1" S "'2"". '0 84..2" S 10-""0 '0 'J.U' S 2J'S'.01 '0 ",U S 01""32 '0 J&..2" S 21""'0 '0 J1,)" S O'-J"" '0 ,~U' S 2"20'Jo '0 .~2t' S JI.O,... '0 J2,J" $ ",),,11 .. 20.?!' 0 eo 100 ISO . .. .. --, ......... wtt\.A>-O 80<þ<:>AAY ..,...-... ""OPtA!Y LH:S A>-O RICH! Of WAY NOT A RECORe OF SURVEY FOR INFORMATION ONI. Y . scx.[ " reC! ¡e~ ~I" .""""...,I.J"'" "'w "..,..,., SI""""""~I,~T.'i"";"~O-:¡W"'lIS1""'" wCT~"",,O """0 SCTBACK STRMaCK'JOHNSON PAAC(L',2'21O~'906' ,,' ,;oc, )1.".",.... ,.._,-------= .. "t - PtH ¡;;¡;j¡'o , .. '. ., ~f ~i.."" ".i. '.. :",'. " - .:" . ":'/: ;:~::~.~;~3~j~~t:.t~{i:i~i):~>~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION WETLAND AND SETBACK STRANICK-JOHNSON PARCEL NO. 212104-9069 That portion of fue northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as fo[[ows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence south 89° 13 '33" east along the north line of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter a distance of 261.26 feet; , thence south 00°14'39" west a distance of 30.00 feet t9 the south right of way margin of South 336th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing south 00°14'39" west a distance of 546.02 feet; thence south 89°13'33" east a distance of 399.45 feet; thence north 00°14'39" east a distance of 546.02 feet to the said south right of way margin of South 336th Street; thence north 89°13 '33" west à1ong said south right of way margin a distance of 399.44 feet to theTRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 5.007 acres. fwld9069.wp5 Pg. 8 of 9 EXHIBIT "II" TO SEITLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 ~ z ß~ ~~ ~~ ~~ E~ ~~ ~ CI) 0\ ~ 0 0\ bO p.. EXHIBIT E TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT JUNE 12, 2003 PARKING LETTER 20 (253) GG 1-11000 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 June 12¡ 2003 Gil Hulsmann Abbey Road Group¡ LLC PO Box 207 Puyallup¡ WA 98371 FilE COpy RE: Christian Faith Center (City File No. 02-102271-UP) Your request dated 5/8/03 concerning drive aisle width and vehicle overhang Dear Mr. Hulsmann: City staff have reviewed the above referenced request with the following responses. Drive aisle width The Director of CDmmunity Development Services will allow the requested 24-foot drive aisle width in place of the dty's typical width of 25 feet¡ but only at locations where the adjacent stall dimensions are 9 feet by 18 fcc! irrespective of overhangs. Drive aisles serving compact-sized stalls or reduced-length stalls resulting from n. !j,d ¡(J allowances must have a 25-foot width. Per city standards¡ up to 25% of the total stalls on the site may be dCö,¡glldtcd as compact¡ with a stall dimension of 8 feet by 15 feet (served by a 25 foot drive aisle). The City will allow the requested 24-foot drive aisles¡ as described above¡ on a "demonstration" basis and in the interest of reducing pervious surface and increasing landscaping along with other low impact development techniques the City has recommended and the applicant is considering for the project. It should also be noted that this decision is consistent with the three example codes you submitted¡ where a 24-foot drive aisle is pennitted when adjacent stall dimensions are 9 feet by 18 feet or greater. It is also consistent with parking standards contained in the 1990 handbook of the American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Vehicle overhang The requested vehicle overhang into landscaping is already pennitted by code and requires no modification. However¡ per code¡ wherever a parking stall will be reduced in length by vehicle overhang into landscaping¡ the required width of the landscaping must be maintained. In addition¡ any overhang into a sidewalk area must maintain a 5-foot unobstructed sidewalk width. TIlerefore¡ the width of landscape areas and sidewalks shall be increased accordingly where necessary to meet this standard. For example¡ a 2-foot overhang into a required to-foot landscape strip would require the landscape strip to be increased to a width of 12 feet. Likewise¡ a 2-foot overhang into a 5-foot sidewalk would require the sidewalk to be increased to a width of 7 feet Full-sized stalls against required landscaping or a sidewalk must incorporate wheel stops to prevent overhang. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns on these topics. Sincerely, Lori Michaelson, AICP Senior Planner C: KatllY McOur1g, Direct(( of Community Oevdopment Services Cary Roe, Direct(( of Public Works Ken Miller, Deputy Director at Public Works Greg Fewins, Deputy Director of Community Development ~ Jim femltng, Oeve1opment Services Manager Doc. 1.0. 23481 EXHIBIT F TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 21 EXHIBIT F-1 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCEPTUAL SANCTUARY BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN r-----, L. . J : EI3 : I EI3 I EEl I I. .1 . @ .0 LJ-~O Abbey Road AS OF: MAY 10,2004 EXHIBIT F-2 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCEPTUAL SANCTUARY BUILDING SECOND FLOOR PLAN OFFICES COLLEGE Abbey Road AS OF: MAY 10, 2004 EXHIBIT F~3 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCEPTUAL SCHOOL BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN r----------ì L OFFICES I I 1= r:~ \ \ \ Z- L___--..r----- ì I I /-i L -¡ I 1 I -î r--/ r-~.I 1 I . '-- 1 L I I FUTURE / -, I 1 CLASS I 1 r - -1 ROOMS ,--4 I I 1 I L I L - -L.lf! AbbeyRoad I I I I ,--.J I I I I I I I AS OF: MAY 10,2004 rr- I I - I I I- I I ~ AS OF: MAY 10,2004 EXHIBIT F--4 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCEPTUAL SCHOOL BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN " / ^ x I I I I I I .-:-.1 I I I I I :êo I ~=n L_-_..---r----- G-l G-2 G-3 G-4 G-5 G-6 G-7 G-8 EXHIBIT G TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SECTION 9.4 TRAFFIC PLANS 18th Ave S S 344th from 16th to 18th 34th/16th SR 99/S 344th 336th from Hwy 99 to 20th 336th from 20th to 1-5 20th A ve/336th 20th Avenue S traffic calming EXHIBIT G-1 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 18TH PLACE SOUTH IMPROVEMENTS 23' 12' 12' 5' 2' 60.0 24' .5' Curb VI r -. c Q. :J CD a. ~ (/) C 0 - C ^ "'C CD WEST SECTION R (MODIFIED) N.T.S. EAST NOTE: UTILITIES WILL REMAIN ABOVE GROUND. Abbey Road AS OF: July 8, 2004 EXHIBIT G-2 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SOUTH 344 TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS 16TH AVENUE SOUTH TO 18TH PLACE SOUTH 6' 4' 8' tf) -0 Parking - Q.. Q ({) ::J ~ ---t- Q ({) - .., ^ 30' NORTH 12' NOTE: NORTH IMPROVEMENTS TIE INTO EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF 16TH AVE. S. AND S. 344TH ST INTERSECTION. UTILITIES TO REMAIN ABOVE GROUND, AS OF: MAY to. 2004 SECTION R N.T.S. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 1 2' 40' . .. _JL 8' Parking SOUTH b~ EXHffiIT G-3 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 16 TH AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 344TH STREET INTERSECTION -. J: : JO__11 t~ I I I , ----+----- . \ , U) -- -------~-- SOUTH 344TH STREET NOTE: iiliTERSECTION TO BE SIGNALIZED AS OF: MAY 10, 2004 Abbey Road EXHIBIT G-4 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SOUTH 344 TH STREET AND HWY. 99 INTERSECTION J /. -- - - ---l¿ ------; I / I / I I II NOTE: / INTERSECTION TO BE SIGNALIZED L- '----~'- --- --- LJ Abbey Rüad AS OF: MAY 10,2004 EXHIBIT G-5 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SOUTH 336 TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. HWY. 99 TO 20TH AVENUE SOUTH 1 2' 1 2' 12' Asphalt Shoulder 36' ~ NORTH 6' 8' 3' Planter Sidewalk Util. Strip 35' -........ SOUTH NOTE: PLANTER AND UTIUTY STRIP MAYBE MODIFIED AT WEST HYlEBOS CULVERT CROSSING{S) TO PROTECT WETlAND AND WETLAND BUFFER. SECTION M AS OF: MAY 10,2004 N.T-S. b~~ EXHIBIT G-6 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SOUTH 336 TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS 20TH A VENUE SOUTH INTERST A TE-5 5' 1 1 ' 12' 1 l' 5' 6' 3' m w \} Uti/. ^ ^ 0 () 39' () ::J -<- () ., l 39' NORTH SOUTH NOTE: PLANTER, SIDEWALK. STREET TREES AND UTILITIES STRIP STOPS 50' WEST OF EAST HYLEBOS BRANCH CULVERT(S) TO PROTECT WETLAND AND WETlAND BUFFER SECTION K N.T.S. AS OF: MAY 10,2004 Abbey Road EXHIBIT G-7 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT . 20TH A VENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 336TH STREET INTERSECTION o~ 0 -n...., C --o:! ;u »0 ro JI-n Q , ::u en c . ~d ~ ~ ;u G) - A. m 00 00 <J1 q ~'-. /: EXTEND PROPOSED SIDEWALK. .' . TO EXISTING SIDEWALK ~.- . . EXTEND PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO EXISTING SIDEWALK -- j ~¿~. -- ,.- -~,- --~":"!-" --.--......'=:' .. . . . .a'-- r ---= .. .~ ',--.,:..,:,- .';1,.<1 d"---' ',' ',,:,,:,.,.4. -=- -=- -- -- - ~ NOTE: INTERSECTION TO BE SIGNALIZED AS OF: MAY 10, 2004 Abbey Road EXHffiIT G-8 TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TRAFFIC CALMING PLANTER ISLAND DETAIL 1- EXI~!NG WIUTH , I , I I I . I . EXTRUDED CURB --1~ <?O; ~ f'1 i'/, ~x ~ - -Q-~-- --- -1 - I :z C) I I I I I EXJctTING WIID TH --- ' I AS OF: MAY to. 2004 - PLANTER ISLAND SIZE TO BE DETERMINED 0 J :z: I.!i -I--L ------~ è:5 5:t 1...1 0 ... I TYP. Abbey Road -- I EXHIBIT H TO CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PROCESS IV HEARING EXAMINER DECISION 23 CITY HALL 33530 1 st Way South PO Box 9718 (253) 661-4000 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 April 23, 2004 i - ---------------- i Ir\~'\ iË :í-ù {~ UPT7 -:'cF:,-- 1,.1.;/ ~o \,l¿? l~ í ~ u II-'" f!l"1 -'~I ;;! .!ì""!Ô '1.,.1 I.; ,0 loll 1/' 'I i " I" ~U U! APR 21 2004 ,¡!.:!; iV, 0 '../1 , ~ ! ~'-' í L_{\~.~ '-y~~-jj v.lt vl~'f..S Uf'.lrø City at ;:e::Jcr:~I~~\~~y Gil Hulsmann Abbey Road Group, LLC PO Box 207 Puyalfup, WA 98372 RE: PROCESS IV REQUEST ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA INTRUSIONS CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, FWHE# 04-03, FW# 02-1-22 71-00-UP Dear Appellant: Enclosed please find the Report and Decision of the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner relating to the above-entitled case. SKC/klb cc: All parties of record City of Federal Way {!,(~r}¡¡ Qh ~¡(-O~ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY r;:...-=.--~---:---,--- II n) IE IC i:f:---'~-~" "WJr~IJ It,..': [ - . r I ) , I Ii' Ii! t U~:;,_;,:,~4__" --- CI>'J(~~~:r;il.('~ ~~:':""\j\, , -----------3 i .f I J I .; i, Page - 1 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER IN THE MATTER OF: PROCESS IV REQUEST ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA INTRUSIONS FWHE# 04-03 FW# 02-1-2271-00-UP CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION The applicant is requesting to: 1) fill a "Category III" wetland and its butte; .2) mitigate for the filled wetland and buffer by creating wetland and additional buffer dlea in and adjacent to a "Category II" wetland on the site; 3) displace a portion uf a wetland/stream buffer to accommodate an access road; and 4) intrude into wetlanc! L'l!'rS for street improvements, including pavement widening, retaining wall, and extending storm pipes and stream culverts. II. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Hearing Date: Decision Date: April 20, 2004 Aprí123,2004 At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence: 1. 2. 3. 4. Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way, Gil Hulsman, 923 Shaw Road, Suite A, Puyallup, WA 98372 Garet Monger, 518 N. 59th, Seattle, WA 98103 Marie Adair, 28811 - 19th Ave. S., Federal Way, WA 98003 At the hearing the following exhibits were admitted as part of the official record of these proceedings: 1, 1-E. 1-F. Staff Report with all attachments Addendum to Environmental Impact Statement (1E) (4/16104) Letters from Public (Beginning w/Derek Dexheimen) (iF) (4/16104) Page - 2 2. 3. 4. 5. Power Point Presentation (Hard Copy) - Process IV Public Hearing Christian Faith Centers - Wetland Areas Chart Statement from Virginia Marquart Marie Adair Statement III. FINDINGS 1. The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into the record, and taken this matter under advisement. 2. The Community Development Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable policies and provisions in this matter and is hereby marked as Exhibit "1" and incorporated i~ its entirety by this reference. 3. All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). 4. The applicant has a possessory ownersllip interest in a generally rectangular, 46.58- acre parcel of unimproved, mostly forèsted property located east of Pacific Highway South and west of Interstate 5 betWeen South 336th Street and South 341 st Place within the City of Federal Way. The applicant has submitted requests for approval of a comprehensive plan amendment, zone reclassification, development agreement, and development plan which, if approved, would allow development of the site into a 218,500 square-foot church, 104,480 square-foot private school, and associated parking, playfields, and landscaping., The decision to approve or deny the above requests is within the jurisdiction of the Federal Way City Council which will hold a public hearing prior to making such determination. 5. To construct the project as proposed, the applicant must also obtain Process IV approval to allow the applicant to fill a wetland and intrude into wetland/strl?é1m buffers. Specifically, the applicant requests authority to fill a Category III wet!, ¡¡ lei and its buffer; create additional wetlands and buffers in and adjacent to an 01 ¡ -site Category II wetland; displace a portion of a wetland/stream buffer to accommodate an access road; and potentially intrude into wetland buffers to make street improvements which could include pavement widening, a retaining wall, and the extension of storm pipes and stream culverts. 6- A north/south trending ridge divides the parcel into two drainage subbasins within the Hylebos Creek Basin. A tributary to the west branch of Hylebos Creek flows Page - 3 from north to south across the west side of the property, and a tributary to the east branch of Hylebos Creek flows across the east side of the parcel from north to south, The Federal Way City Code (FWCC) defines both tributaries as major streams. 7. Three wetlands exist on the site. Wetland "A" measures approximately 4.5 acres, 14,000 square feet of which are located on the site. Wetland "A" is associated with the Hylebos tributary and also serves as an operating, regional storm drainage detention facility known as "Kitts Corner Pond", designed and maintained by the City. Pursuant to a 1996 Settlement Agreement between the City and a previous property owner, the applicant will discharge stormwater runoff from the we~~ti:rn portion of the site into the Kitts Corner Pond (Wetland "A"). However, the primary wetland hydrology is provided by the tributary which flows into Wetland "A" through an 18-inch diameter storm pipe and a pair of 42-inch diameter stream culverts beneath South 336th Street. 8. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the City has provided a permanent buffer width of 100 feet around Wetland "A" with. the exception of the northern portion of the boundary adjacent to South -3:36th Street which ranges in width from approximately 40 feet to 50 feet The proposed site plan shows an access extending east into the site from Pacific Highway South through the southern portion of the wetland buffer as anticipated by the Settlement Agreement which requires City staff to support such an extension. However, the agreement requires Process IV review'and hearing exàminer approval. Thus, development of the project will not impact Wetland "A", but will impact the buffer along the south portion of the wetland and could impact a portion of the buffer along the north portion of the wetland. 9. As previously found, a Hylebos Creek tributary flows into the wetland from beneath South 336th Street, exits the site through an adjustable gate spillway in the southwest corner of the pond, and then flows into a storm pipe which passes beneath Pacific Highway South. The tributary has no defined stream channel within Wetland "A" and dries up during the late summer. 10. Wetland "C" consists of a 3,762 square-foot Category III Palustrine scrub-shrub wetland located near the center of the parcel at the proposed location of the school auditorium/sanctuary building. The applicant proposes to fill both the wetland and its required 25-foot wide buffer. Wetland "C" has no hydrological connection to any other water body as its hydrology is provided by a high ground water table. The Page - 4 11. 12. 13. wetland has low habitat value due to its size, lack of plant diversity, isolation, and lack of open water during the summer months. Wetland "8", located along the eastern property line, consists of a linear, riparian . wetland that is associated with and straddles the eastern Hylebos Creek tributary. The wetland meets the definition of a Category \I Palustrine Forested wetland which requires a 10O-foot wide buffer. The Hylebos tributary provides hydrology for the wetland as it flows into said wetland through two culverts beneath South 336th Street. Sewer line construction previously disturbed the wetland and buffer. The site plan shows the wetland surrounded by a 10O-foot wide buffer with the exception of the north portion adjacent to South 336th Street. To build the project as proposed and make a reasonable use of the property, the applicant must fill Wetland "C" and its buffer. To mitigate therefor, the applicant proposes to intrude into Wetland "8", its buffer, and the tributary buffer to CI eate 5,200 square feet of Category II wetland which will include grading. The applicant must also displace 16,305 square feet of Wetland "A" buffer to facilitate construction of the access road from Pacific High~ay Söuth. To mitigate for the displacement, the applicant proposes to create 20,083 square feet of wetland buffer along the eastern border of the existing buffer. The applicant may need to displace an unknown amount of buffers for both Wetlands "A" and "8" adjacent to South 336tll Street. The exact area of displacement (if any) will not be known until the City Council makes its determination regarding approval of the project and road improvements. Maximum displacement will include 11,690 square feet of Wetland "A" buffer and 6,794 square feet of Wetland '~8".buffer. To mitigate, the applicant will add 21,480 square feet of wetland buffer to the northeast buffer of Wetland "A" and 17,165 square feet of buffer along the western buffer of Wetland "8" (See Exhibit 3). Section 22-1358 FWCC sets forth the criteria an applicant must meet prior to constructing improvements and making land surface modifications within regulated wetlands. Section 22-1359 FWCC sets forth criteria for constructing improvements and land surface modifications within regulated wetland buffers. The first five criteria set forth in each section are identical, but modifications within wetlands have four additional criteria. As previously found, the applicant must fill Wetland "C" and its buffer. Prior to obtaining approvaUo do so, the applicant must establish that the request satisfies all criteria set forth in Sections 22-1358(d) and 22-1359(f) FWCC. Findings on each criteria are hereby made as follows: Page - 5 A. Filling the wetland will not adversely affect water quality. The wetland has no hydrologic connection with other wetlands or stream corridors. A code- required final erosion and sedimentation control plan will address 3dverse water quality impacts related to grading and filling activities, The CfR;!ted wetland and buffer along the eastern tributary will provide much greater functions relating to water quality, hydrology, and wildlife habitat than currently provided by Wetland "C". 8. Filling the wetland and buffer will not adv.ersely affect the quality of wildlife habitat. Wetland "C" has low habitat value due to its small size, hydrnloqic isolation, lack of plant diversity, and lack of open water during the SUf1'¡¡¡er, The compensatory mitigation areas along Wetland "B" will provide I~abitat values equal to or greater than retention of Wetland "C". No endangered or protected animals inhabit the site. C. Filling the wetland and buffer will not adversely affect drainage or storm water retention capabilities. The applicant will excavate the mitigation area to ensure a volume of surface water detention and retention equal to Wetland "C". D. Filling will not lead to unstable earth conditions or create erosion hazards. Wetland "C" is not located near any geologically hazardous areas, and an erosion and sedimentation control plan which the City must approve will address erosion from filling and grading. E. Filling the wetland will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area nor to the City as a whole. As previously found, the applicant will create 5,200 square feet of wetland as compared to the 3,762 square feet filled. F. As previously found, the filling of Wetland "C" will result in no net loss of wetland area, function, or value. G. The project is in the best interest of the public health, safety, or welfare. As previously found I creating additional wetland and buffer within the valuable stream/wetland area along the east property line results in greater resource protection and will allow more efficient use of land. H. The applicant has demonstrated sufficient scientific expertise and Page - 6 15. supervisory capability to carry out the project. The applicant's wetland biologist is a recognized expert with over 10 years experience in designing wetland mitigation plans. I. The applicant is committed to monitoring the project and making corrections if the project fails to meet projected goals. The applicant has provided a mitigation and monitoring plan for a five-year period and has also designed the storm drainage system to allow further discharge into the wetlands to restore hydrology if such is necessary. J. The City has approved the applicant's conceptual mitigation plan, and the replacement and enhancement wetland and buffer ratios satisfy the criteria set forth in Section 22-1358(e)(3) FWCC. Prior to obtaining approval to intrude into Wetland "8" and its buffer and the Stream "8" buffer to provide compensatory wetland and buffer for filling Wetland "C" and its buffer, the applicant must also establish that the request satisfies the criteria set forth in Sections 22-1358 and 22-135~ EWCC. Findings on each criteria are hereby made as follows: A. Intrusion to create additional wetlands will not adversely affect water quality. The created wetland area will have a greater diversity of wetland plants than Wetland "C", and such plants will provide water quality by removing nutrients and toxins by filtration and uptake in plant tissue. Mitigation and monitoring will ensure no adverse impacts to water guality, 8. The intrusion will not adversely affect the existing quality of the wetland's or buffer's wildlife habitat. Habitat potential in the mitigation area of Wetland "8" is greater than the wetland and buffer of Wetland "C". The enhanced native scrub-shrub plant community and native forest habitat will increase the vegetation and plant diversity thereby improving near stream habitat opportunities. c. The intrusion will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities. The applicant has designed the created wetland to replicate the stormwater retention capacity of Wetland "C", The applicant will excavate the toe of an existing slope and create a volume of surface water detention and retention comparable to or greater than the filled wetland. Creek flood waters, as well as stormwater runoff, will provide a source of hydrology to the Page - 7 16. new wetland. Project stormwater is infiltrated into the ground will move down slope through the wetland buffer into the created wetland. D. The intrusion will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards. The creation area consists of a relatively level flood plain adjacent to the Hylebos tributary. Excavation depth will range from one to three feet, and water velocities, even during winter flooding periods, are relatively slow. The dredging will create no steep slopes or other topography subject to erosion. Extensive revegetation will bind the soil and control erosion. E. The intrusion will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area nor to the City as a whole. The project will not affect off-site properties or public or private open space areas. F. As previously found, the intrusion will result in no net loss of wetland ;.HP3, function, or value. The applicant is creating more wetland than it is filling in accordance with the requirements of the FWCC. The applicant is also establishing substantially more wetland buffer than destroyed. ~ .,.... G. The project is in the best interest of the public health, safety, or welfare. As previously found, trading a small, isolated wetland for an expanded, connected, wetland system results in greater resource protection and more efficient use of land. . H. As previously found, the applicant has demonstrated sufficient scientific expertise and supervisory capability tö fulfill the project. Prior to eliminating a portion of Wetland "A"'s south buffer to allow construction of the access road from Pacific Highway South, the applicant must establish that the request satisfies the criteria set forth in Section 22-1359(f) FWCC, addressing wetland buffers, and Section 22-1312(c) FWCC, addressing intrusion into setLJ(~ks for streams. Said Sections set forth the same criteria, but Section 22-1312 FWCC has one additional criteria. Findings on each criteria are hereby made as follows: A. Locating the access road within the Wetland "A" buffer will not adversely affect water quality. As previously found, Wetland "A", located mostly west and northwest of the site, is known as the "Kitts Corner Pond" and provides a regional storm drainage facility- The applicant's conceptual storm dr3inage plan (Exhibit L) shows surface water collected from the proposed access Page - 8 17. , ¡ ! road and directed into a storm water treatment system to the south of said road. The water then discharges into Wetland "A" following cleansing. B. Construction of the road in the buffer will not adversely affect the existing quality of the wetland's or buffer's wildlife habitat. The buffers on the west and south sides of Wetland "A" are presently in poor condition and consist of earthen berms, gravel roadways, and sparse vegetation. However, the eastern buffer consists of forest and is therefore in good condition. The applicant proposes to remove 16,305 square feet of a previously disturbed buffer area and replace it with property adjacent to the high quality, forested buffer on the east side of the wetland. The access road is proposed within an existing access easement and was recognized in the Settlement Agreement. C. Construction of the road will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities. Construction in accordance with a final storm drainage grading and erosion control plan win assure no adverse impacts to the drainage or stormwater retention càpabìlities of the buffer. D. Construction will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion !1azards. The road area contains no geologically hazardous areas, and construction in accordance with approved plans will ensure that no unstable earth conditions or erosion hazards develop. E. Construction will npt be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the City as a whole, including loss of open space. Replacement of a disturbed buffer with forested property will benefit the City and properties in the area. The additional buffer will preseNe and protect sensitive areas from future land modifications and encroachments by people and animals. F. Section 22-1312(c)(6) requires the applicant to show that the intrusion is necessary for reasonable development of the subject property. The road will provide access to the site in accordance with an existing easement recognized by the Settlement Agreement. To build the project, the applicant must have an access onto Pacific Highway South. Therefore, the applicant cannot proceed with reasonable development without the road. As previously found, depending on the City Council's requirements for street Page - 9 improvements on South 336th Street, the applicant may need to intrude into those portions of the buffers of both Wetlands "A" and "8" located within the right-of-way of said road. If the City Council requires full street improvements within the wetland . buffer areas, the applicant will need to disturb 11,690 square feet of Wetldl1d itA" buffer and 6,794 square feet of Wetland "8" buffer. The applicant proposes to create 21,480 square feet of buffer for Wetland "A" and 17,165 square feet of buffer tor Wetland "8". Thus, the applicant will replace 18,484 square teet of low quality wetland buffer with 38,645 square teet of high quality buffer. Prior to intruding into said wetland buffers to make street improvements, the applicant must establish that the requests satisfies the criteria set forth in Sections 22-1312 and 22-1359 FV\lCC. The request satisfies said criteria as the applicant must construct improvelnents to include pavement widening, retaining walls, and extension of storm drainage pipes. The existing location and configuration of South 336111 Street plus the required street improvements dictate the street and storm drainage system design for the ')vmall project. All improvements will occur within the right-at-way, and the retaining 'Nalls will limit buffer displacement. 80th buffers along South 336th Street have been previously disturbed by construction at existing street and drainage improvements but have revegetated over time. As previqusly noted, a sewer line was constructed within Wetland "8". The wetland 'buffers within the right-ot-way provide no significant habitat value, but must be invaded to provide access to the site. The applicant has also demonstrated that the stream cannot cross beneath South 336th Street in an open condition, and extending the culvert by three feet will have little, discernable effect on stream function or habitat. The existing culvert meets the 100- year storm design standard as will the extensions. The culvert design does not preclude fish passage, although fish do not inhabit either tributary, and are not located immediately down stream. . 18. In summary, Wetland "A" will not be disturbed, but will have its buffer area expanded from the present 192,327 square feet to a possible 205,895 square feet, and will also have 3,598 square feet of wetland enhancement. Wetland "c" will be filled and eliminated. Wetland "8" will increase in size by 5,200 square feet and will have its buffer area increased from the present 1 93,085 square feet to 220,089 square feet. Overall, wetland size will increase from the present 242,971 square feet to 244,410 square feet. Wetland buffers will increase from the present 393,838 square feet to 425,985 square feet (Exhibit 3). Therefore, development of the site as proposed will result in no net loss in wetlands and/or wetland buffers. 19. Prior to obtaining Process IV review approval, the applicant must establish that the request satisfies the criteria set forth in Section 22-445(c) FWCC. Findings on each ý Page - 10 20. criteria are hereby made as follows: A. All requests are consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Applicable goals and policies set forth in the Plan include Policy CA4 which approves a tradeoff of small, isolated wetlands in exchange for a larger, connected wetland system which can achieve greater resource protedion and reduce isolation and fragmentation of hab!tat. The applicant proposes a development which eliminates a "small, isolated wetland" in exchange for increasing the size of a more valuable, larger, connected wetland sv,c:t(:nl. Policy NEG7 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the protectic dld enhancement of the functions and values of the City's wetlands, and the applicant's mitigation plans do so. As previously found, the project meets the City's objective of no overall net loss of wetland functions or vallli:'; in accordance with Policy NEP43. The mitigation site complies wit!: ',¡!Icy NEP50 as it contributes to an existing wetland system and increases buffers for existing wetlands. B. The project is consistent will all applícable provisions and laws of the FWCC assuming compliance with conditions of approval and City Council approval for the overall development. C. The project is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. D. The City Council will determine whether the streets and utilities in the area are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal. The wetland mitigation does not generate demand on streets and utilities. Approval of the Process IV request will authorize street frontage improvements within the South 336th Street right-of-way and construction of an access road from Pacific Highway South, E. The City Council will determine whether the proposed accesses to the parcel are at their optimal location and configuration. Again, the Process IV approval authorizes street improvements and construction as set forth . above. The City included a number of comment letters which raised generalized objections regarding the filling of wetlands and intrusion into wetland buffers. However, none of the letters offered expert testimony contradicting the applicant's expert st! II) if)S and the City's review thereof. The Washington Court of Appeals addressed such Page - 11 comments in Maranantha Mininq v. Pierce County, 59 Wash.App. 795 (1990); The only opposing evidence was generalized complaints from displeased citizens. Community displeasure cannot be the basis of a permit denial. 59 Wash.App. 795, at 804. IV. CONCLUSIONS From the foregoing findings the Hearing Examiner makes the following conclusions: 3. 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues preSCf ¡fed by this request. 2. The applicant has established that the request to fill a Category III wetland and buffer, mitigate for such activities by providing additional wetlands and ¡, fters, displacing a wetland/stream buffer to accommodate an access road, and intrude into wetland buffers to construct street improvements is consistent with applicable criteria set forth in Sections 22-1358,22-1359, and 22-1312 FWCC. The project also complies with applicable goals ana policies of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The project satisfies all criteria set forth in Section 22-445(c) FWCC for Process IV approval. Therefore, Process IV approval should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. As required by the Director of Community Development Services, prior to occupancy of any buildings on the site, the applicant shall set aside the wetlands and buffers approved by this decision as Native Growth Protection Tracts (NGPT's). The boundaries of the areas shall be surveyed and shall reflect the expanded buffers shown in a final approved Mitigation and Monitoring Plan, prepared in accordance with Condition #7 below; and shall be in addition to the buffer area for the east side of Wetland "Au as delineated the 1996 Settlement Agreement between the City of Federal Way and the Federal Way Industrial Park. The applicant shall submit the draft documents for the City's review and authorization and the documents shall be recorded as directed by the City. As required by the Directors of Community Development Services Department and Public Works Department, prior to issuance of any Page - 12 construction permits, the applicant shall field-flag all identified wetland buffer boundaries in accordance with a final approved Mitigation Plan, prepared in accordance with Condition #7 below; and consistent with the recorded Native Growth Protection Tracts as required by Condition #1 above; and the buffer boundaries shall be reflected on all applicable construction drawings and permits. 3. As required by the Director of Community Development Services, prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for the City's review and approve a plan to provide signage on the site, idelltlfying environmentally sensitive areas and prohibiting human and pet access into such areas. The plan shall include the number, location, and design details, including text, for the proposed signs. 4. Any use of the recreational field adjacent to Wetland "8" for competitive athletic games, such as baseball or soccer, as may be approved by the Director of Community Development Services, must provide fencing adjacent to the sports field along the west Wetland "8" buffer boundary, delineated pursuant to Condition #1 above. Prior to initiation of any such activities, the applicant shall establish the fencing pursuant to the City's review and approval of a fencing plan and design details as proyided by the applicant, and such fencing shall be designed to allow for the passage of small animals. 5. As required by the Director of Community Development Services pursuant to FWCC § 22-1358(1)(g) and § 22-1358(3)(4), prior to issuance of construction permits related to any work approved with this application, the applicant shall: (a) provide a cost estimate that covers the complete costs for plant materials, installation, and mé1intenance. including contingencies, pursuant to the final approved Mitigation Plan; (b) provide a performance and maintenance bond to the City in the amount of 120 percent of the cost estimate; and (c) pay for the services of a qualified professional selected and retained by the City to review monitoring reports. conduct inspections, and make recommendations to the City during monitoring period. Following successful installation of the wetland mitigation work pursuant to the final approved Plan and initial inspection. the performance portion of the bond shall be released and the five-year maintenance portion of the bond shall apply during the five years of monitoring. Page - 13 6. As required by the Director of Public Works, grading and clearing activities in the Wetland "B" mitigation area (excluding installation of planting and an irrigation system) shall be prohibited between October 1st and April 30th. 7. Prior to issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall submit a final Mitigation and Monitoring Plan, for the City's -review and approval, that addresses all outstanding requirements as identified in the April 8, 2004, memorandum from Sheldon and Associates, Inc. 8. The Process IV approval does not take effect unless or until the City Cn! :ndl approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone, Devei¡ 'I.: ì..,Hlt Agreement, and Development Plan, as separately requested by the applicant. DECISION: The request for Process IV approval to allow the filling of Wetland "C", the mitigatic)f1 for the filled wetland and buffer by the creation o[wetland and additional buffer area in &1 and adjacent to Wetland "B"; the displacemeñf of a portion of a wetland/stream buffer to accommodate an access road; and the intrusion into wetland buffers for street improvements is hereby granted subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions above. ~ DATED THIS 2 ~ DAY OF ~ , 2004, to the following: d TRANSMITTED THIS;<3.-- DAY OF APPLICANT/AGENT: Gil Hulsmann Abbey Road Group, LLC PO Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98372 Page - 14 OWNER(S): Christian Faith Center PO Box 9860 Seattle, WA 98198 Bob Loomis 2101 S. 324thSt, SP 205B FederalVVay, WA 98003 Carl Jones Belmor Park 2101 S 324th St, SP333 Federal Way, WA 98003 RD. Pearson 2101 S. 324th St, #303 Federal Way, WA 98003 Jack Tylare 2101 S. 324th St, #10 Federal Way, WA 98003 Barry Turnbull 33355 20 S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Shirley Fulbraa 33357 20 S. Federal Way, WA 98003 ~ ",-, Phyllis L Bowman 32820 20th Ave. S., #25 Federal Way, WA 98003-9429 Tom Rolph 1860 S. 336th St FederalVVay, WA 98003 Marie Adair 28811 19th Ave. S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Juliet Sykes 402 S. 333fd St, Suite #100 Federal Way; WA 98003 Dr. Patricia Mail 35214 - 28th Ave. S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Virginia Marquart 29009 22nd Ave. S. FederalVVay, VVA 98003 Paul Ouellette 1918 Rolling Hills SE Renton, WA 98055 John C. Brownson 2101 S. 324th St, #117 Federal Way, WA 98003 Rik Newell 2101 S. 324th St, #137 Federal Way, WA98003 Robert Roper 525 SW 312th St Federal Way, VVA 98003 Joann Piquette Ted W. Wilson Page - 15 302 S. 295th PI. FederalVVay, VVA 98003 824 S. Marine Hills VVay FederalVVay, VVA98003 Margaret Nelson 32904 4th Ave. SW FederalVVay, VVA 98023 John Kanto 1824 S. 344th St. FederalVVay, VVA 98003 City of Federal Way c/o Chris Green P.O. Box 9718 Federal VVay, WA 98063-9718 PROCESS IV Rights 1ô Appeal Decisions of the hearing Examiner may be appealed by any person who is to receive a copy of that decision under FVVCC Section 22-443. The appeal, in the form of a letter of appeal, must be delivered to the Department of Community Development Services within fourteen (14) calendar days after the issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision. The letter of a'ppeal must contain: 2. A statement identifying the decision being appealed, along with a copy of the decision; 3. A statement of the alleged errors in the Hearing Examiner's decision, including specific factual finds and conclusions of the Hearing Examiner disputed by the person filing the appeal; and 4. The appellant's name, address, telephone number and fax number, and any other information to facilitate communications with the appellant. The person filing the appeal shall include, with the letter of appeal, the fee established by the City of the costs of preparing a written transcript of the hearing (or in the Page - 16 alternative, the appellant may prepare the transcript at his or her sole costs from tapes of the hearing provided by the City).The appeal will not be accepted unless it is accompanied by the required fee and cost (or agreement of the appellant to prepare the transcript). Appeals from the decision of the Hearing Examiner will be heard by The City Council. The decision of City Council is the final decision of the City. The action of the City in granti.ng or denying an application under this article may be reviewed pursuant to RCW 36.70C in the King County Superior Court. The land Use Petition must be filed within twenty-one (21) calendar days after the final land use decision of the City. EXHIBIT D STATEMENT OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The applicant has a possessory ownership interest in a generally rectangular parcel of unimproved property located east of Pacific Highway South and west of Interstate 5 (1-5) between South 336th Street and South 341 st Place within the City of Federal Way. 2. The subject site currently has a comprehensive plan and zoning designation of Business Park (BP) and the land is presently vacant. Existing zoning and land uses of the surrounding properties in the vicinity include single and multiple family to the north; a mix of residential, commercial, and industrial to the south; commercial to the west, and Interstate 5 and commercial to the east. 3. The applicant has submitted requests for approval of a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone, with an associated development agreement and development plan to allow development of the site into a 218,500 square-foot church, 101,526 square-foot private school, and associated parking, playfields, and accessory uses. 4. The requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone is subject to a City Council decision pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article IX, "Process VI Review;" and the requested Development Agreement and Development Plan is subject to City Council decision pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article IX, "Process VI Review," and FWCC Chapter 22, Article XXI, "Development Agreements." The decision to approve or deny the requests is within the jurisdiction of the Federal Way City Council. 5. The City Council held a Public Hearing May 24, 2004 and June 15,2004, took testimony, admitted evidence into the record, and considered the matter fully. 6. All appropriate procedures were followed in accordance with the requirements of the FWCC and applicable law. 7. All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the FWCC and applicable law. 8. The Hearing Examiner reviewed and conditionally approved the environmentally sensitive areas requests associated with the application on April 23, 2004. The Hearing Examiner Decision sets forth general findings, applicable policies and provisions in the matter and is hereby incorporated in its entirety, without limitation, by this reference. 9. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A), the City issued a Notice of Adoption of Existing Environmental Documents and Issuance of a Detennination of Nonsignificance, on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone of the site from Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential 3600 (RM-3600) on July 4, 2001. The City issued Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) for the development application on November 18, 2003, and March 3, 2004, and EIS Addenda on April 16, 2004 and May 21,2004. Four public meetings were conducted during the environmental review process for the proposed project. These included an EIS Scoping Meeting on August 27,2002; Neighborhood Traffic Meeting on May 8, 2003; Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) hearing on December 12, 2003; and City Council EIS briefing on March 15,2004. The Threshold Determination, EIS and addenda, and all environmental documents for the project, are hereby incorporated in their entirety, without limitation, by this reference. 10. The Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable policies and provisions in the matter and is hereby incorporated in its entirety, without limitation, by this reference. 11. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1660, "Purpose," development agreements associated with a comprehensive plan designation and related zoning change may be used at the City Council's discretion, where the project is larger in scope and has potentially larger impacts than normal, or where the City Council may desire to place certain restrictions on the proposal. The intent of a development agreement is not to waive requirements normally associated with a proposed use. A "Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement", herein called "The Agreement" or "The Development Agreement," has been prepared for the project in order to fully address and mitigate identified impacts associated with the project. The Concomitant Agreement allows for a rezone of the property subject to conditions governing the use of the property. Under the Concomitant Agreement, the allowable use of the property shall be limited to a church, a school, and accessory uses. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1662, "Content," the Agreement sets forth the development standards and other provisions that apply to and govern and vest the development, use, and mitigation of the development of the real property for the duration specified in the Agreement, consistent with the applicable City of Federal Way development regulations. The Agreement is accompanied by a Development Plan (Exhibit B to the Agreement) as required by FWCC Section 22-1669, and has been prepared in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1664, "Preparation of Development Agreement." 12. Mitigation measures established in the Agreement are based on the FWCC and adopted regulations, policies and procedures; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP); the EIS prepared for the project, including the key development and operational assumptions underlying the EIS analysis; and the City's police power authority. 13. Mitigation measures established in the Agreement are proportional to direct, identified impacts of the development and are supported by substantial evidence. 14. The proposed principal uses of the site as a church and school, are allowed uses in the proposed Multifamily Residential (RM) zoning districts, pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-671 and 22-674, subject to all applicable development regulations and standards. Use and development of the site consistent with the FWCC and the Development Agreement will help ensure compatibility of the use with surrounding areas. 15. The project will provide a "front yard" setback from South 336th Street of a minimum 50 feet; with "side" and "rear" yards of 30 feet for the church building; and 50 feet for the school building, ball fields and any playground equipment. This provides an additional 20 feet more of front yard setback from South 336th Street for the church building than would be required by FWCC Sections 22-671 and 22-674, which allows additional landscape screening against South 336th Street and residential zoning districts to the north of the site. In addition, pursuant to code-required parking setbacks and design guidelines, a IS-foot parking lot setback along church portion with landscape buffer will be provided along the south property line adjacent to the residential uses to the south. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-1O2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 2 16. Consistent with FWCC Sections 22-671 and 22-674, the maximum allowed height of single-story elements of the church building is 35 feet above average building elevation (ABE), with up to three additional feet allowed for articulated cornices, and the maximum second-story height for offices, classrooms, library, and similar uses is 40 feet above ABE. The maximum height of the school building is 40 feet above ABE, with up to three additional feet allowed for articulated cornices. The maximum height of the sanctuary portion of the church, and the gymnasium portion of the school auditorium, is 55 feet ABE. 17. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1669, "Development Plan," and FWCC Section 22-395, "Director's Decision", the site and architectural design elements of the project were approved in a March 20, 2004, Director's Design Decision, based on the analysis and findings contained in Exhibit A to the decision. Development of the site in accordance with the design decision and other conditions of project approval and required mitigation will ensure incorporation of good design principles and compatibility with surrounding areas. The design decision sets forth general findings, applicable policies, and provisions, and is hereby incorporated in its entirety, without limitation, by this reference. 18. The applicant's preliminary clearing, grading, erosion control, significant tree survey, landscape, and surface water drainage plans have been reviewed and accepted under applicable City of Federal Way adopted codes, policies, and regulations, including FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface Water Management"; FWCC Chapter 22, Article XVII, "Landscaping"; and the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City's amendments to the KCSWDM, subject to review of final construction plans prepared in accordance with all applicable codes and development standards; the EIS; Process IV conditions of approval; and mitigation required under the Development Agreement. 19. Surface water detention and water quality treatment facilities will be provided for both the west and east drainage sub-basins on the site, in accordance with all applicable design and development regulations. 20. The Development Agreement establishes a number of mitigation measures that meet or exceed code requirements. This includes the oversight of a Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control (ESe) Supervisor; a Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan; a phased construction plan; and seasonal construction limits. Surface water mitigation in the Agreement includes design and construction of the east side stonnwater detention pond to meet Level 2 flow control standards; collection and dispersement of roof runoff from the sanctuary roof to adjacent wetland buffer areas; design and construction of surface water treatment facilities for the East and West 1 sub-catchments to include the use of Stonnwater Management filter vault systems, with compost medium, that meets or exceeds Resource Stream Protection Standards; and provision of an Integrated Pest Management Plan as described in the Department of Ecology Storm water Manual (2001), in order to control the use of fertilizers and pesticides. The Agreement also provides for denser vegetated bank cover and larger trees around surface water detention water quality treatment ponds than would otherwise be required by code. Additional vegetated cover will contribute to water quality by decreasing the temperature of surface water runoff from impervious surfaces and standing water in drainage facilities. This will help mitigate stonnwater drainage impacts from the development. 21. Perimeter landscape buffers, as specified in the Development Agreement, meet or exceed the applicable standards in FWCC Section 22-1566, "Multifamily Residential, RM." This includes 50 feet of landscaping along South 336th Street; 20 feet along other public rights-of-way and access easements; 15 feet along other property lines associated with the church; and 10 feet along other Christian Faith Center Files CP A99-0004, 02-1 02271-00-UP, 02-1O2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 3 property lines associated with the school. These provisions are consistent with the FWCC, and also provide 20 feet of additional landscaping along South 336th Street than required by code. A 50 foot vegetated landscape buffer along South 336th Street will preserve additional native trees and shrubs and preserve a cross-site vegetated corridor linking to on-site wetland and stream buffers and riparian areas along the East Branch Hylebos Creek. In addition to retaining native vegetation and providing habitat opportunity, this corridor will provide water quality functions such as rainwater interception and filtering. 22. The clearing, grading, surface water, and landscaping mitigation provided in the Development Agreement is consistent with goals and policies contained in the FWCP Natural Environment Chapter, including NEGl, NEG2, NEG3, NEGlO, NEPl, NEP2, NEP7, NEP 10, NEP18, NEP21, NEP63, and NEP64. 23. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-1671, 22-1674, and 22-1378, the required amount of parking for churches and schools is determined on a case-by-case basis, pursuant to a parking demand analysis. Based on the City's review of the applicant's Traffic Management Plan (TMP), the Development Agreement specifies a minimum of 1,406 parking stalls and a maximum of 1,540 stalls on the site to serve anticipated parking demand for ordinary operation of the site. The Agreement also requires the applicant to prepare and submit an overflow parking plan for review and approval to the Public Works Director prior to special events to manage overflow parking using resources such as transit, shuttle service, and traffic control such as flaggers and police officers. The Agreement establishes the parking setbacks from property lines, consistent with FWCC Sections 22-671 and 22-674. 24. Lakehaven Utility District has provided Certificates of Water and Sewer Availability for the property, and will provide these services pursuant to developer extension agreements between the applicant and District. Fire and emergency medical services will be provided by the Federal Way Fire Department. A City-operated regional storm drainage detention pond located in the northwest portion of the site has been determined to have adequate capacity to accommodate site drainage from the westerly sub-basin on the property. 25. Staff has reviewed and analyzed transportation related matters. The Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable policies, and provisions related to the matter, and is hereby incorporated in its entirety, without limitation, by this reference. 26. The project site has frontage on the existing rights-of-way of South 336th Street, SR 99 (Pacific Highway South), South 341 st Place, and the planned extension of 20th Avenue South, as shown in FWCP Map III-5. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1474(a), frontage improvements are required for these roadways. 27. South 336th Street is classified as a minor arterial, as shown in FWCP Map III-5. FWCP Map III-6 classifies South 336th Street as a Type K street. FWCP Map III-19 was revised to relocate the segment of a bicycle route on South 336th Street between 13th Place South and 20th Avenue South to South 330th Street. Therefore, a Type K street is no longer applicable to South 336th Street west of 20th Avenue South; a Type M street is now the appropriate standard. Existing improvements on the frontage consist of 36 to 54 feet of pavement with intermittent curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the north side only. Existing right-of-way width varies from 60 to 100 feet. The applicant will dedicate five feet of right-of-way on the west 400 feet of frontage only and construct the required half-street improvements on the entire frontage. Modifications approved by the Director of Public Works may be made pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1477, in order to minimize impacts to wetlands and wetland buffers. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit 0 to Adoption Ordinance Page 4 28. SR 99 (Pacific Highway South) is classified as a principal arterial, as shown in FWCP Map III-5. FWCP Map III-6 classifies SR 99 as a Type A street. SR 99 is currently under construction to provide full standard improvements, and all necessary right-of-way has been acquired. 29. Twentieth Avenue South is classified as a minor collector, as shown in FWCP Map III-5. FWCP Map III-6 classifies 20th Avenue South as a Type R street. As a new street through the site, the applicant will dedicate all 66 feet of right-of-way and construct full street improvements. 30. South 341 5t Place is classified as a minor collector, as shown in FWCP Map III-5. FWCP Map III-6 classifies South 341 5t Place as a Type R street. Existing improvements consist of a 36-foot street with curbs and gutters, and five-foot sidewalks in a 60-foot right-of-way. The applicant will dedicate an additional three feet of right-of-way. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1477, the requirement for street frontage improvements on South 341 5t Place are waived because the improvements are already in place. 31. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1474(b), the City may require up to 300 square feet ofright-of-way dedication per average daily trip generated. According to the £IS, average daily trip generation would exceed 2688 trips, thus allowing the City to require at a minimum 806,486 square feet of right-of-way dedication. Approximately 108,290 square feet of right-of-way dedication would be required to meet full standards. Thus, the right-of-way requirements are proportionate with the level of impact. 32. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1542, two-lane driveways shall be 30 feet wide, and three-lane driveways shall be 40 feet wide, unless design vehicles (the largest vehicle that would reasonably be expected to use the driveway, and therefore the one to which the driveway will be designed) require larger widths. The £IS analyzed all driveways as two-lane except for the northerly of the four driveways onto 20th Avenue South, and the driveway onto South 336th Street, which were assumed to be three-lane driveways. 33. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1543(a), South 336th Street has an access classification of four, which allows access points with spacing of 150 feet measured centerline-to-centerline. FWCC Section 22-1543(c) limits access to one per 330 feet of frontage. South 336th Street has approximately 2150 feet of frontage, thus six access points could be allowed. The site plan for the project shows one access approximately 572 feet west of 20th Avenue South. A single-family residential driveway is located opposite this proposed driveway, the driveway to the Ridgecrest Motel is located approximately 100 feet to the west, and a driveway to a multi-family residential complex is located 230 feet to the east. The spacing standard does not apply to single-family residential uses. If the driveway were to be relocated to the east, it would worsen the intersection sight distance for traffic turning left from the driveway onto westbound South 336th Street. If the driveway were relocated to the west, it would infringe upon wetland buffer. The Ridgecrest Motel consists of eight units. Based on ITE Trip Generation, 6th edition, the motel is estimated to generate four trips the morning, evening, and Saturday peak hours, and three trips during the Sunday peak hour; therefore, although this access does not meet spacing standards, it has a low probability of creating a significant safety issue. City staff will monitor. 34. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1543(a), SR 99 has an access classification of one, which, due to its status as a state highway, must meet the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) standard of 250 feet. Left-turn in access would best be allowed at a spacing of 330 feet, and full access is permitted only at signalized intersections. However, FWCC Section 22-1543( c) limits Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 5 access to one per 330 feet of frontage. The site has approximately 534 feet of frontage; therefore, only one access point would be permitted. The project proposes to provide a right-in/right-out access 749 feet south of South 336th Street, which would be shared with Pacifica Plaza. This location has no other access within 250 feet. Therefore, this access meets driveway spacing standards. 35. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1543(b), the access spacing standard for 20th Avenue South would be 150 feet. Each of the proposed driveways meets this standard. However, FWCC Section 22- 1543(c) limits access to one per 330 feet of frontage. Twentieth Avenue South has 1662 feet of frontage, thus five access points could be allowed, whereas four are proposed. Therefore, this standard is met. 36. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1543(b), the access spacing standard for South 341 st Place would be 150 feet. FWCC Section 22-1543(c) limits access to one per 330 feet of frontage. No access points are proposed onto South 341 st Place. However, the creation of the intersection of 20th Avenue South and South 341 st Place creates access spacing issues with an existing driveway at the intersection of 21 st Avenue South and South 341 st Place. As part of engineering plan review, the applicant will provide plans that provide adequate intersection sight distance, geometries, and traffic control measures that provide for safe and efficient operation of the intersection consistent with FWCC and adopted standards. 37. Pursuant to TIA Guidelines item VI.DA.a, the City uses Highway Research Record 211 to determine when left-turn lanes are warranted at unsignalized intersections. A left-turn lane is warranted when certain thresholds involving travel speeds, left-turn volumes, through volumes in the same direction as the subject left-turn, and opposing traffic volumes are exceeded. 38. Based on the volumes in the traffic analysis for the EIS, this warrant is met at the driveway on westbound South 336th Street during the morning, afternoon, and evening peak hours. Therefore, the applicant will provide a westbound left-turn lane at the site access on South 336th Street. 39. Based on the volumes in the traffic analysis for the EIS, left-turn lane warrants are met at the north driveway on northbound 20th A venue South during the morning, and Sunday between service peaks; at the north central driveway on southbound 20th Avenue South during the morning, afternoon, Sunday between service, and Sunday after service peaks; at the south central driveway on northbound 20th A venue South during the morning, and Sunday between service peaks; at the south central driveway on southbound 20th A venue South during the Sunday between service peak; at the south driveway on southbound 20th A venue South during the Sunday between service and after service peaks; and at the south driveway on northbound 20th Avenue South during the Sunday between service peak. Since left-turn lanes are warranted at each driveway, the applicant will stripe 20th Avenue South to provide a two-way left-turn lane throughout the site. 40. The proposed schedule of activities contained in the Traffic Management Plan (TMP), required pursuant to FWCC Section 22-671, was analyzed in the environmental review. Pursuant to FWCP Policies TP5, TP45, and TP62, the following restrictions on the scheduling of activities will be placed on the development in order to reduce traffic impacts: school classes will be completed by 3:30 pm; Sunday services will be separated by at least 90 minute~; evening services will be scheduled to start no earlier than 6:30 pm; Dominion College will have no classes scheduled between noon and 6:30 pm; and special events will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis pursuant to the TMP and should be scheduled to not add trips during peak hours of other uses, or conversely, other uses should be canceled to accommodate the special events. Should a modification of this Christian Faith Center Files CP A99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 6 schedule of activities, which was submitted for review in the EIS, be required, the Agreement specifies the applicable code process to use. 41. The intersection of SR 99 at South 31th Street would fail the adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards in 2007 with or without Christian Faith Center (CFC). This intersection was originally included in the study area based on a 10 evening peak hour trip threshold in the City's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses. As a result of the initial analysis, CFC modified their proposed hours of operation to reduce evening peak hour trip generation. As a result, the project now impacts this intersection by eight evening peak hour trips, less than the 10-trip threshold. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this intersection. 42. Pursuant to the methodology analyzed in the EIS, the intersection of South 320th Street and 23rd Avenue South fails the adopted LOS standard during the evening peak hour in 2007, with or without the project, and fails as a result of the project during the Sunday peak. Staff considered other methodologies for detennining failure of the adopted LOS standard without violating the adopted policy. In practice, City staff has administered the policy as outlined in the TIA guidelines as the worst of two tests. Table 2 defines a volume/capacity ratio test as Xc (as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual) must be less than 1.000. However, item V.B. in the TIA Guidelines specifies that no movement shall have a volume/capacity ratio greater than 1.000. It is this latter standard upon which the EIS identified the LOS failure. Using Xc, the volume /capacity ratio is 0.91 during the 2007 evening peak hour and 0.94 during the Sunday peak hour. Given that using Xc is consistent with FWCP Policy TPI6, and the high cost to mitigate relative to the impact, no mitigation will be required at this intersection. 43. The intersection of South 336th Street at 1st Way South would fail the LOS standards during the evening peak hour in 2007 with or without the project. The proposed mitigation would provide a protected right turn overlap phase for westbound traffic during the southbound left-turn phase. This is a minor revision to the signal design and will be incorporated into the capital project at this location, which is scheduled to be in design in 2004. No mitigation will be required at this intersection beyond pro-rata share contributions described in the Agreement. 44. The intersection of 16th A venue South at South 341 st Place would fail the LOS standard during all peak hours analyzed as a result of the project. The project would add 426 trips during the morning peak hour, 344 trips during the afternoon peak hour, 99 trips during the evening peak hour, and 820 trips during the Sunday peak hour. Because of its proximity to the signalized intersection of 16th Avenue South and SR 99, it is impractical to signalize this intersection to resolve the LOS failure. 45. The EIS considered three alternatives to resolve the LOS failure at 16th Avenue South and South 341 st Place. One assumes that the capacity restriction will resolve itself by drivers rerouting to avoid making the left-turn from westbound South 341 st Place to southbound 16th Avenue South, by rerouting to South 336th Street and SR 99 when leaving the site, called the "Capacity Constrained Distribution" in the EIS. The second is to provide a connection between South 341 st Place and South 344th Street, and use planned signalized intersections on South 344th Street at 16th Avenue South and SR 99 to access these roadways. The third alternative considered is to prohibit westbound left-turns from South 341 st Place to southbound 16th Avenue South and accommodate U- turns by constructing a roundabout at the intersection of SR 99 and 16th A venue South. Based on staff analysis, alternatives one and three are not recommended. 46. The "Capacity Constrained Distribution" assumes that due to significant delays encountered when attempting to make a westbound left-turn from S 341 st Place to 16th Avenue S, drivers would Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-IO2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit 0 to Adoption Ordinance Page 7 become frustrated and learn to use alternate routes. The EIS analysis assumed that most of these trips would leave the site to the north onto S 336th Street, and most would head west on S 336th Street to SR 99 and turn left to 16th Avenue S or continue straight on SR 99. Although no capacity improvements appear warranted as a result of this assignment, staff has significant concerns about the safety of the 16th Avenue S / S 341 st Place intersection under this scenario. It has been the City's experience that unsignalized intersections operating near capacity have a higher than average collision rate. This is due primarily to increased driver frustration, leading to drivers choosing gaps in opposing traffic that are inadequate to complete the maneuver safely. Therefore, this alternative is not recommended. 47. The roundabout alternative would provide adequate levels of service. In order to accommodate planned traffic volumes, it would have a 3-lane roundabout with an inscribed diameter of 200 feet. As SR 99 is a state highway, any intersection modifications would have to be approved by WSDOT. To date, WSDOT has not approved any three-lane roundabouts on the state highway system, and its historical reluctance to approve 2-lane roundabouts casts doubt as to whether this would be a viable alternative at this time. In addition, a roundabout would need right-of-way on both sides of SR 99, impacting developed properties on the east side of SR 99. Therefore, this alternative is not recommended. 48. Providing a connection between South 341 st Place and South 344th Street reroutes traffic around the intersection of 16th Avenue South and South 341 st Place, and takes advantage of a project planned by the City to construct traffic signals on South 344th Street at 16th Avenue South and at SR 99. 49. Potential locations to provide this connection between South 341 st Place and South 344 th Street are 21st Avenue South and 18th Avenue South. Due to the presence of wetlands, three different alignments for 21 st Avenue South were considered in the EIS. An alignment along the existing right-of-way would impact wetlands and result in two stream crossings; an alignment to the east would cross the wetland at its narrowest width, but would still impact wetlands and result in two stream crossings; and an alignment to the west would avoid impacting the stream and wetlands, but would require right-of-way acquisition from the truck parking lot. 50. Eighteenth Avenue South has continuous right-of-way, but is not a through street due to an existing temporary berm. Eighteenth Avenue South provides a preferred alternative to 21 st Avenue South due to the wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed 21 st Avenue South alignments and the transitional nature of the residential neighborhood on 18th Avenue South. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1477, the required right-of-way width may be modified by the Director of Public Works to avoid right-of-way acquisition and lessen the impact to the neighborhood, and utility undergrounding will not be required. Therefore, the applicant will construct 18th Avenue South as a modified street section between the southern extent of the street improvements in Kits Comer Business Park and South 344th Street. 51. The rerouting of trips using this connection on 18th Avenue South would add 417 trips to the east leg of South 344th Street east of 16th Avenue South, and 128 trips between 16th Avenue South and SR 99 during the Sunday after service peak hour. Both of these intersections are currently unsignalized. The addition of these trips would create LOS failure and safety issues associated with unsignalized intersections operating over capacity. Staff has determined that these intersections would not operate safely if the project's trips impacted these intersections prior to the completion of the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) project scheduled for 2008 that would add left-turn lanes on South 344th Street and signalize both intersections. Therefore, the applicant will construct traffic signals at these intersections. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 8 52. Staff analysis has determined that the project's trips meet warrants for left-turn lanes in the westbound direction at both the intersections of SR99 and 16th Avenue Sand S 344th Street and 16th Avenue S. Eastbound left-turn lanes may also be needed to line up lanes across the intersections within allowable tapers, depending on the intersection geometries; this will be determined through engineering plan review of these intersections. Although the £IS identifies impacts related to right- of-way acquisition in order to provide full-standard improvements, it is not necessary to provide full street improvements to mitigate the safety and LOS deficiencies at these intersections. The applicant will be required to develop a design that mitigates the safety and LOS impacts while minimizing right-of-way acquisition. The applicant will provide signalization and westbound left- turn lanes necessary to assure the safe operation of these intersections in the interim. Signal interconnect will also be provided between the two signalized intersections. The need for eastbound and westbound left-turn lanes will be determined during engineering plan review. The requirement for any of the left-turn lanes on South 344th Street may be waived by the Public Works Director if it is determined that to do so would require right-of-way acquisition. 53. The intersection of 16th Avenue SouthlEnchanted Parkway South (SR 161) at South 348th Street (SR 18) fails the adopted LOS standard during the school afternoon peak and the Sunday peak with or without the project. The project would add 150 trips during the school afternoon peak hour and 328 trips during the Sunday peak hour. The EIS identifies the construction of a second northbound right-turn lane as a mitigation measure that would correct the LOS deficiency during the school afternoon peak by improving the LOS from F to D, and reducing the LOS deficiency significantly during the Sunday peak hour by reducing the volume/capacity ratio from 1.24 to 1.04. This mitigation measure is in addition to the project in the adopted 2004-2009 TIP, which would add a third westbound left-turn lane and eastbound and westbound right-turn lanes. Based on the traffic analysis for the E1S, in order to function without being blocked by queues in the through lanes, the right-turn lanes would need to provide 550 feet of storage. Therefore, the applicant will pay $350,000 to expand the scope of the City's existing project to add the construction of a second right-turn lane with 550 feet of storage. 54. WSDOT is proposing to construct a major revision to the I-5/SR 18 interchange, which would include access between SR 161 and 1-5 to and from the north. This would provide an alternative route that would reduce traffic volumes through the intersection of SR 18 and SR 161. Therefore, it is unknown at this time what intersection configuration will be needed over the longer term at SR 18 and SR 161. Consequently, the addition of through lanes northbound that would be needed to meet the LOS standard in 2007 may not be needed after 2012. 55. The intersection at 20th Avenue South at the south central site access fails the adopted LOS standard during the Sunday after service peak as a result of the project. It is impacted by 1047 Sunday peak hour trips. The £IS addressed four options for addressing the LOS failure: provision of a two-way left-turn lane on 20th Avenue South, construction of a roundabout, signalization, and flagging the driveway during peak hours. Provision of a two-way left-turn lane is recommended to accommodate turning movement volumes, but does not fully mitigate the LOS deficiency. Left-turn volumes from 20th A venue South into the driveways are high enough that the two-way left-turn lane would not be available for use as a refuge area for vehicles turning left from driveways onto 20th Avenue South. Flagger control during the project's peaks would safely manage traffic only when it is needed. CFC has proposed this option in the TMP. Given the low volumes of through traffic on 20th Avenue South during the project's peak hours of trip generation on Sundays, and the relative lack of impacts by the use of flagger control compared to the other alternatives, flagger control is the recommended mitigation for this location. The applicant will provide flagger control of this Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 9 driveway during Sunday peak hours, subject to conditions of the Right-of-Way Activity Permit to be issued by the Department of Public Works. 56. The EIS suggests as a mitigation measure to minimize the intrusion of project-generated traffic into residential neighborhoods to the north of the site an education program to influence route choices by notices, announcements, and new member orientation used to educate drivers. Pursuant to FWCP Policy TP5, the applicant will provide an ongoing education program to minimize traffic intrusion into adjacent residential neighborhoods. 57. The EIS discusses a broad range of traffic calming tools that might be used to discourage through traffic from using 20th Avenue South north of the site, and to maintain reasonable speeds for a residential neighborhood for those that do choose to use 20th Avenue South. Based on the analysis of the alternatives by staff, a through movement diverter is recommended and will be placed at the intersection of 20th Avenue South and South 336th Street, and is intended to prohibit through movements on 20th Avenue South across South 336th Street. All other movements at the intersection would be permitted. The design will accommodate transit turning movements and full access for emergency vehicles, making it possible that smaller vehicles could still drive around the diverter. 58. Despite the diverter, some project-generated traffic may still be expected to use 20th Avenue South to the north of the site. Therefore, there is still some need to discourage the use of 20th Avenue South through traffic calming north of the site, even with the through movement diverter. Traffic circles have been found by many agencies to significantly reduce intersection collisions and slightly reduce midblock vehicle speeds. In order to be effective at reducing speeds and encourage yielding behavior, deflection of the driver's path upon entry to the traffic circle is required. At a three-legged intersection such as at South 332nd Street, additional pavement widening may be required to provide for adequate deflection and provide positive guidance to the driver. In no case should additional right-of-way be required. Pursuant to FWCP Policy TP5, the applicant will place the through movement diverter at the intersection at South 336th Street, and yield-controlled traffic circles at South 330th Street and South 332nd Street to reduce intersection collisions and midblock vehicle speeds. 59. Neighborhood Traffic Meetings were held June 3, 2004 and June 25, 2004 with the residents on 18th Avenue South to determine the best solution for improving 18th Avenue South. Based on the discussions at the meetings, the residential segment of 18th Avenue South will be improved to a modified street section, consisting of 24 foot wide street with vertical curb and gutter, 5-foot sidewalks and 2 additional street lights mounted on existing power poles. Traffic calming elements will be installed, including two speed humps, 1 crosswalk, bulb outs at the intersection of 18th Avenue Sand S 34l5t Street and 18th Avenue Sand S 344th Street to narrow the throat width of 18th Avenue S to 20 feet, and street signage to address no through truck traffic, children playing, speed humps, crosswalk and speed limit will be installed. 60. The EIS discusses the potential advantage of extending the code-required frontage improvements on the south side of South 336th Street to provide pedestrian access to transit and the sidewalk network on SR 99. The intersection of SR 99 and South 336th Street is served by Metro Route 182 and Pierce Transit Routes 402 and 500. The City's project on SR 99 will provide transit amenities at the bus stops at this intersection. These improvements could be provided at little additional expense and would connect to one of the best-served transit corridors in the City. Therefore, pursuant to FWCP Policies TP62, TP65, and TP77, the applicant shall provide sidewalk on the south side of South 336th Street to be extended from the west property line of the site to SR 99. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-1O2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 10 61. The EIS discusses the provision of transit amenities such as shelters, benches, bus landing pads, etc. as a potential mitigation measure. The site is served by Pierce Transit Route 501 at a bus stop located on the south side of South 336th Street east of 20th A venue South, and a bus stop located on the east side of 20th Avenue South north of South 336th Street. Sidewalks will be provided to the bus zone by code-required frontage improvements on South 336th Street. Pursuant to FWCP Policies TP62, TP65, and TP77, the applicant will provide a transit shelter (if requested by King County Metro or Pierce Transit), shelter footing, litter receptacle pad, bus landing pad, and bench, designed to King County Metro standards, located by City staff in consultation with King County Metro and Pierce Transit staff on the north side of South 336th Street east of 20th Avenue South, and on the east side of 20th Avenue South north of South 336th Street. In addition, the sidewalk will be extended on the east side of 20th Avenue South from the intersection of South 336th Street to this latter bus zone. This will help mitigate increased vehicle trips from the project. 62. The EIS addresses pro-rata share mitigation for impacts to capital projects listed on the City's TIP based on the specific project generated trips. The calculation of pro-rata contributions is described in the TIA Guidelines item VLD. In general, the pro-rata contribution is the number of evening peak project-generated trips divided by the total evening peak hour traffic with the project multiplied by the estimated cost of the TIP project. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1475 and FWCP Policy TP62, the applicant shall either construct the impacted TIP projects or pay $235,900 as a pro-rata mitigation payment for impacts to projects in the 2004-2009 TIP, as identified in the Agreement. 63. The project impacts a capital project in unincorporated King County at the intersection of South 320th Street and Military Road S. Therefore, the applicant will pay King County $647 as a pro-rata share mitigation payment for impacts to the County project. 64. The development proposal includes signalization of the intersection of 20th Avenue South and South 336th Street. This intersection meets Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) warrants for signalization under existing conditions; thus the proposal is consistent with FWCC Section 22-1476. The MUTCD also recommends that traffic signals within one-half mile of each other be able to be coordinated. This intersection is one-quarter mile east of the signalized intersection of SR 99 and South 336th Street. FWCP Map III-3 shows that these facilities were planned to have signal communications available between them. Pursuant to FWCP Policy TP39, the applicant will provide signal interconnect on South 336th Street between SR 99 and 20th Avenue South. 65. Based on the traffic analysis in the EIS, left-turn lanes on South 336th Street are warranted during all weekday peak hours analyzed eastbound, and during all peak hours analyzed westbound. In order to provide the left-turn lanes, the existing westbound shoulder could be restriped as a through lane. However, this would eliminate the safe walking route for school children to reach a school bus stop on 20th Avenue South from South Garden Court and Green Crest Villas condominiums. Therefore, the applicant will provide continuous sidewalk improvements on the north side of South 336th Street between South Garden Court and Green Crest Villas to provide a safe walking route to the bus stop. 66. The TIA guidelines adopt the use of an article, Guidelines for Right- Turn Treatments at Signalized Intersections, for determining the need for right-turn lanes at signalized intersections. Based on the traffic analysis in the EIS, right-turn lanes are warranted on all legs of the intersection of 20th Avenue South and South 336th Street. In conjunction with the through movement diverter, no through lanes on 20th Avenue South would be required. Thus, no additional widening would be Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-1O2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 11 necessary on the south leg of the intersection. On the north leg of the intersection, the right-turn lane would have to have a vehicle storage length of 175 feet to function effectively. A right-turn lane on the west leg of the intersection would require additional right-of-way dedication from the project, and would have to provide 100 feet of storage to function effectively. Per WSDOT Design Manual Figure 910-14, right-turn lanes would also require 50-foot tapers. The applicant shall construct improvements to the intersection of 20th Avenue South at South 336th Street that provide signalization; signal interconnect on South 336th Street between SR 99 and 20th Avenue South; left- turn lanes on all legs of the intersection and an eastbound right turn lane with 100 feet of storage; a southbound right-turn lane that provides 175 feet of storage; the diverter island that would prohibit through movements on 20th Avenue South. These improvements mitigate the project impacts by providing adequate levels of service at the intersection, while discouraging project-generated traffic from impacting residential neighborhoods north of the site. 67. Based on the traffic analysis in the EIS, under the worst case queuing, the westbound left-turn lane at the intersection of SR 99 and South 336th Street would need a storage length of 450 feet. The existing storage available is 100 feet. The increase in storage length, combined with associated tapers per WSDOT Standard Plan H-3, would overlap the taper necessary to accommodate the left- turn lane at the site driveway onto South 336th Street. Therefore, pursuant to FWCC Section 22- 1475, the applicant will provide a continuous left-turn lane between SR 99 and 20th Avenue South. 68. New traffic signals are proposed at the intersections of 20th Avenue South at South 336th Street, 16th Avenue South at South 344th Street, and SR 99 at South 344th Street. In addition, the project would significantly alter travel patterns before and after Sunday services. New signal coordination timing plans would need to be developed to accommodate safe and efficient travel in the project vicinity. Pursuant to FWCP Policy TP39, the applicant will develop timing plans for Sunday peak hours of the development at SR 99 at South 324th Street, SR 99 at South 330th Street, SR 99 at South 336th Street, 20th Avenue South at South 336th Street, 16th Avenue South at SR 99, 16th Avenue South at South 344th Street, and SR 161 at SR 18. 69. Transportation mitigation provided in the Development Agreement is consistent with goals and policies contained in the FWCP Transportation Chapter, including TP5, TPIO, TP14, TPI6, TP20, TP21, TP23, TP30, TP38, TP39, TP45, TP47, TP62, TP65, and TP77. 70. FWCC Section 22-1671 sets out factors to be considered for a development agreement. The City may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors when considering a development agreement: 1) compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; 2) adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; 3) potential benefits of the proposal to the community; and 4) effect upon other aspects of the comprehensive plan. 71. Development of the site in accordance with all adopted City codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation contained in the Development Agreement, will address project-related impacts and ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. Transportation impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will be addressed by code-required street frontage improvements and mitigation established in the development agreement, including additional street and sidewalk connections; a new street through the site; traffic calming measures such as traffic circles and island diverters; signalization; transit shelter improvements; signal timing plans; traffic management plan; and operational parameters governing use of the site. Conditions of the Hearing Examiner's Process IV decision will ensure that project-related impacts to on site wetlands, streams, and buffers are addressed. Mitigation in the Development Agreement pertaining Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-1O2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 12 to clearing, grading, and landscaping, will further address construction and development-related impacts. The Director's Design Decision also ensures quality design standards and project aesthetics for compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods. Additionally, the use of the property as a church and school is more compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods than the types of uses allowed under BP zoning. Therefore, development of the site in accordance with all adopted City codes, policies, regulations, and conditions of approval, and mitigation contained in the Development Agreement is compatible with, and will not adversely impact, adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. 72. Development of the site in accordance with all City codes, policies, and regulations and conditions of approval and mitigation contained in the Development Agreement will ensure adequacy of, and address impacts to, community facilities including roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools. Potential transportation-related impacts to adjacent street and the City transportation system were considered in the EIS. Mitigation for these impacts included in the Development Agreement, pursuant to City Code and the EIS, includes system improvements such as construction and dedication of 20th Avenue South through the site, connecting and improving 18th Avenue South, frontage improvements, signalizing of intersections, and traffic calming measures and transit improvements. Driveway and street access to the site was reviewed and determined to be at the optimal location and configuration, subject to the City's adopted design standards and street plans. The recreational needs of the school and day care students will be met on site by the code-required outdoor play areas, and the play field. The minimum amount of outdoor play area included in the Development Agreement meets and exceeds the requirements of the City of Federal Way and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. In addition, users of the site may utilize City parks in the area. Any such use is expected to be small. The proposed development contains a private school. 73. The proposed church and school are expected to generate employment opportunities and potential economic and social benefits. Based on information provided by CFC, it would employ 120 employees. CFC hosts several major conferences each year, including the Vision Conference attracting 2,500 - 3,000 visitors each March, and a women's conference attracting approximately 2,000 visitors each November. CFC also participates in foreign exchange programs and estimates approximately fifteen to twenty percent of its students are from foreign countries. Employees, members of the congregation, and others who come for services, meetings, and school, may also patronize local merchants and service providers such as retail, restaurants, hotels, and entertainment. Therefore, more economic benefit would be anticipated than is currently generated by the existing vacant site. Additionally, CFC proposes several commercial activities on the site, including latte stands and bookstores, which are expected to generate revenue. As proposed and as required, the project will construct needed right-of-way improvements on and off site, including a new fully-improved City street through the site; street frontage improvements including curbs, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, street lights, and a bike lane; and other street improvements identified in the Development Agreement. Such improvements will promote safe and effective vehicle and pedestrian circulation on the site and in the immediate vicinity. In addition, the project will convert a large, vacant site that has historically been unused to a development that meets all City code requirements for landscaping, lighting, pedestrian amenities, site surveillance, and architectural design principles. CFC will provide educational opportunities through a school and college. It will provide recreation fields and a venue for special events within the City. Conditions contained in the Development Agreement will ensure mitigation of adverse impacts to on-site environmentally sensitive areas resulting from the development. Also, religious organizations typically operate or participate in various local social service-related programs such as food and clothing banks, Youth programs, and counseling, from which the community may benefit. Therefore, development of the site in accordance with all City codes, policies, regulations, and conditions of approval and Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-IO2271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 13 mitigation contained in the Development Agreement will provide potential benefits to the community. 74. Development of the site in accordance with all City codes, policies, and regulations and conditions of approval and mitigation contained in the Development Agreement will have no negative impact upon any other aspects of the comprehensive plan. The vision of the FWCP is to provide a supply of land for such uses as services, employment, parks, open space, and housing to meet future demand. If developed as proposed, the Project will provide land for services, employment, and recreational areas. The BP zone is that zone intended for industrial uses including manufacturing and warehousing. The July 2000 Market Analysis concluded that there would be a low demand for BP-zoned land. Therefore, the reduction in BP zoned land, resulting from changing the designation of this site from Business Park to Multiple Family will not affect the vision of the comprehensive plan. 75. FWCC Sections 22-529 (incorporating 22-448(c) by reference) and 22-530 set forth the factors that may be considered for a site-specific comprehensive plan amendment and associated rezone, and the criteria for such amendments. The City may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors when considering a proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan: the effect upon the physical environment; the effect on open space, streams, and lakes; the compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; the adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools; the benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; the quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; the current and projected population density in the area; and the effect upon other aspects of the comprehensive plan. In order to encourage efficient and desired development and redevelopment of existing land designated and zoned for various types of commercial uses, when considering proposals for comprehensive plan amendments and rezones from one commercial designation to another, the City will consider development trends in commercially zones areas, market demand for various types of commercial land, and amount of vacant commercial land. For site-specific comprehensive plan amendments, the provisions of FWCC Section 22-488(c) shall also apply. 76. FWCC Section 22-488 established the following rezone criteria that must be considered. The proposed rezone is in the best interest of the residents of the City; and the proposed rezone is appropriate because either: 1) conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly changed since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed conditions, a rezone is within the public interest; or 2) the rezone will correct a zone classification or zone boundary that was inappropriate when established; it is consistent with the comprehensive plan; it is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan; and it is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; and the proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; and the site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; and the site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon the public services and utilities; and the rezone has merit and value for the community as a whole. 77. The requested comprehensive plan amendment and rezone, from BP to RM 3600, would not in itself affect the physical environment if approved. It would result in changes to the comprehensive plan map and zoning map. Pursuant to the proposed Development Agreement, development of the site would be limited to two buildings with associated parking and recreational and athletic fields. One building would consist of a church sanctuary, school auditorium, and approved accessory uses, and the other building would be used as a private school. An evaluation of potential impacts to the Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 14 physical environment as a result of the development of the site as proposed was conducted in an EIS. If the property is developed in accordance with all applicable adopted City codes, policies, regulations, and mitigation contained in the proposed Development Agreement, impacts to the physical environment will be mitigated. 78. The site contains environmentally sensitive areas, as studied in the EIS, including regulated wetlands and streams and their buffers. The Hearing Examiner has approved certain intrusions into these areas, subject to City Council decisions on the comprehensive plan amendment, rezone, development agreement and development plan, in order to construct the project as proposed. Activities approved by the Examiner include filling a Category III wetland and its buffer, and related mitigation including a created wetland and additional buffer area in and adjacent to a Category II wetland on the site. Additional intrusions into wetland and stream buffer were approved in order to accommodate an access road and construct required right-of-way and related improvements including pavement widening, retaining walls, and extending storm pipes and stream culverts. Construction of the site in accordance with all conditions of the Hearing Examiner's decision will result in no net loss of wetlands and wetland buffers and stream buffers. In addition, pursuant to the Hearing Examiner's conditions of approval, all on site wetlands, streams, and their required buffers will be set aside and recorded as Native Growth Protection Easements or Tracts and permanently protected from any future land modifications or intrusions. In addition, the Development Agreement establishes mitigation pertaining to surface water drainage detention and water quality treatment that meets and exceeds code requirements. No lakes are present on the site. If the property is developed in accordance with all applicable adopted City codes, policies, regulations, and mitigation contained in the Hearing Examiner Decision and proposed Development Agreement, impacts on open space, streams and lakes will be mitigated. 79. The request for a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning from BP to RM 3600 zoning (one unit per 3,600 square feet) is accompanied by a proposed Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement, which contains a variety of mitigation measures related to site use and operation, transportation, parking, landscaping, and surface water drainage, designed to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. In addition, rezoning the site from industrial to multifamily with a church and school development would be more compatible with residentially-zoned properties in the area than uses that may develop under the current industrial zoning, such as a warehousing facility with associated truck traffic. If the property is developed in accordance with all applicable adopted City codes, policies, regulations, and mitigation contained in the proposed Development Agreement, the development will be compatible with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods, and impacts on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods will be mitigated. 80. Development of the site as proposed, in accordance with all applicable codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation measures contained in the Development Agreement, will ensure the adequacy of, and mitigate impacts on, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools. 81. The July 2000 Market Analysis concluded that there would be only an 11 to 13 percent demand for BP-zoned land in the 2000 to 2020 period. Therefore, it is possible that this land would not develop for BP uses in the near future. Conversion of the vacant site from vacant property, which is unlikely to develop in the near future, to a developed site as proposed, in accordance with all applicable codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation measures contained in the Development Agreement, will be a benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-1O2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 15 82. Due to the size of its existing congregation, school, and accessory uses such as administrative offices, Dominion College, day care, and future projections for growth, the CFC would like to locate on an approximate 50-acre parcel. Based on a survey of the King County Assessor's records conducted by City staff, there are only two vacant parcels in the City that are 25 acres or more in size. One of these is the parcel under discussion and the other one is the subject of Kits Corner request, located south of South 336th Street and west of Pacific Highway. The July 2000 Market Analysis concluded that there would be only an 11 to 13 percent demand for BP-zoned land in the 2000 to 2020 period. Therefore, it is possible that this land would not develop for BP uses in the near future and a comprehensive plan change and rezone to multiple family zoning and development of the site as proposed, in accordance with all applicable codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation measures contained in the Development Agreement, will provide the quantity and location of land necessary for the proposed land use, density, and demand for such use. 83. If this site were developed today as warehousing under the existing BP zoning, it would generate approximately 268 employees. Based on information provided by the CFC, if the request for a multiple family designation was granted, and the facility was constructed as proposed, it would employ 120 employees. If the comprehensive plan and rezone is approved pursuant to the proposed Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement, the use of the site is limited to the proposed church and school and permitted accessory uses, and it will not generate housing units. Rezoning of this site to allow development as a church and school will not impact the City's ability to meet required housing targets mandated under the Growth Management Act (GMA). Therefore, the proposal will not impact current and projected population density in the area. 84. There will not be any adverse impacts upon any other aspect of the comprehensive plan as a result of the proposed change from industrial zoning to multifamily zoning, pursuant to an approved Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement. The vision of the comprehensive plan is to provide a supply of land for such uses as services, employment, parking, open space, and housing, to meet future demand. The BP zone is that zone intended for industrial uses, including manufacturing and warehousing. One of the reasons that the July 2000 Market Analysis was prepared was to determine whether the City has a 20-year supply of adequately zoned land to meet future demand. The Market Analysis concluded that there would be a low (11-13 percent) demand for BP-zoned land within the 20-year horizon. Therefore, changing the designation of this site from BP to multiple family will not affect the vision of the comprehensive plan of providing an adequate supply ofland to meet future demand. 85. As described Findings 77 through 84 above, the requested comprehensive plan amendment and rezone as mitigated does not adversely impact the physical or natural environment; surrounding properties; the adequacy of community facilities; population; or the comprehensive plan; including the supply of and demand for BP-zoned property in the City. Therefore, the rezone is in the best interests of the residents of the City. 86. The City of Federal Way incorporated in February 1990. At that time, the parcels proposed for development by CFC had a mix of multi-family zoning on the west and light manufacturing zoning on the east. Upon incorporation, the City of Federal Way zoned the parcels Manufacturing Park (MP). This was changed to Business Park (BP) in 1995. Properties to the north across South 336th Street have developed as multi-family in recent years. However, very little BP zoned land has developed in this area. Additionally, the July 2000 Market Study found that there would be only an 11 to 13 percent demand for BP-zoned land in the 2000 to 2020 period. As a result, rezoning this property is appropriate and in the public interest, to allow its development rather than remaining Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page] 6 vacant, while at the same time maintaining an adequate supply of industrial zoned property to meet the anticipated demand. 87. The criterion that the rezone will correct a zone classification or zone boundary that was inappropriate when established is not applicable. 88. The requested rezone from BP to RM-3600 does not conflict with the vision of the comprehensive plan to accommodate industrial uses, such as warehousing and manufacturing, in BP zones located on both sides of SR-99 in the vicinity south of South 336th Street, with other BP nodes located around South 272nd Street and South 348th Street. As noted in Finding 84 above, the requested comprehensive plan change and rezone will not decrease the City's supply of BP-zoned property commensurate with the anticipated demand. Rezoning and development of the site pursuant to all applicable adopted City codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation contained in the proposed Development Agreement, will ensure consistency with the comprehensive plan. 89. If the request is granted, use and development of the site must comply with all applicable provisions of this "chapter" (FWCC) and all applicable adopted regulations; Process IV conditions of approval; mitigation; and the FWCP. Furthermore, a comprehensive plan amendment from BP to multiple family and associated rezone is required for the property to be developed as a church and school. Therefore, the requested rezone, if approved and developed pursuant to all applicable adopted City codes, policies, regulations, conditions of approval, and mitigation contained in the proposed Development Agreement, will be consistent with the comprehensive plan and the "chapter". 90. The requested comprehensive plan amendment and rezone has been analyzed and determined to be consistent with the FWCC and adopted regulations; and the FWCP, and is therefore consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 91. Based on Findings 86 through 90, the criteria in FWCC Section 22-488(c)(1)a-e) are met. 92. The proposed development has been reviewed pursuant to all applicable provisions of this chapter (FWCC), and as proposed and as conditioned, it complies with this chapter in all respects. 93. The use of a Concomitant Agreement and Development Agreement enables the City to limit the use of the site to a church, school, and approved accessory uses. As described in Findings 77 through 84, the Development Agreement has been crafted to minimize adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity. Examples include, but are not limited to, requiring a larger buffer along South 336th Street, limiting the enrollment of the school and Dominion College, and restricting the scheduling of activities, such as requiring school classes to be completed by 3:30 p.m. and not scheduling special events that add trips during peak hours of other uses. The site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. 94. All public services and utilities are available and adequate to serve the proposed development. Lakehaven Utility District has provided Certificates of Water and Sewer Availability for the site, and will provide these services pursuant to developer extension agreements between the applicant and District. Fire and emergency medical services will be provided by the Federal Way Fire Department. A City-operated regional storm drainage detention pond located in the northwest portion of the site has been determined to have sufficient capacity to accommodate surface water Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-IO2271-00-UP, 02-1O2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 17 drainage from the westerly sub-basin of the proposed development. The applicant will provide storm drainage detention facilities for the easterly sub-basin on the site in accordance with the FWCC and Development Agreement. Surface water drainage mitigation contained in the Development Agreement provides a higher standard of water quality treatment for both the East and West Sub-basins on the site, and a higher standard of detention on the East Sub-basin, than would otherwise be required by code. The site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon public services and utilities. 95. Rezoning of this site ITom BP to multiple family has merit and value for the community as a whole because it will allow development of a site that has not yet been developed and may not develop under the current zoning based on the City's Market Analysis, it supports Growth Management Act goals and policies for urban development, and for the reasons stated in Finding 73. 96. The proposed comprehensive plan amendment has been analyzed and determined to be consistent with the FWCC and FWCP, and therefore bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare. 97. The requested comprehensive plan amendment, rezone, and development of the site as a church and school pursuant to the proposed Development Agreement, is expected to generate some benefits to the community, including employment opportunities, development of a previously undeveloped site, potential economic benefit to local shopping areas, restaurants, and hotels; and provision of social services such as food and clothing banks, and youth programs, and counseling programs, as discussed in Finding 73. Therefore, the proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City. 98. RCW Chapter 36.70A, the Growth Management Act, requires the City of Federal Way to adopt and implement a comprehensive plan and to amend it in a timely manner, but no more than once a year, except under certain circumstances. The City is responding to this mandate by updating the comprehensive plan. FWCP Page IV -7 (Economic Development), recognizes that there has been no substantive BP development since the City's incorporation, which suggests the influence of market forces outside of the City limits, where cheaper land and established industrial parks act as a draw for prospective park development. Therefore, the change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning of this site ITom BP to multiple family will not reduce the supply of BP-zoned property below what is necessary, and will enable development consistent with the economic development vision in the plan. The proposal is consistent with FWCP Economic Development Policies EDPII, EDP22, and EDP23, related to bringing in new jobs to the community, developing cultural and recreational opportunities, and encouraging the development of new multi-purpose facilities in order to increase the number of visitors to Federal Way and resultant visitor spending. The proposed amendment is, therefore, consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. 99. As addressed in the staff report, the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and rezone have been reviewed and determined to be consistent with all applicable decisional criteria contained in the FWCC, and with the applicable goals and policies contained in the FWCP. tOO. As addressed in the staff report, the Development Agreement and Development Plan have been reviewed and determined to be consistent with all applicable decisional criteria contained in the FWCC, and with the applicable goals and policies contained in the FWCP. K:\CFC\Documents\Findings - Exhibit 0 to Adoption Ordinance Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-IO2272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 18 9.2.4 School Hours. School classes shall be completed no later than 3:30 p.m. daily. 9.2.5 Holiday Services/Special Events. Holiday services and special events shall be scheduled consistent with the approved Traffic Management Plan (TMP) required by 9.4.12 and consistent with 9.1.4.4. 9.3 Construction Mitigation. 9.3.1 Erosion Sediment Control. CFC shall designate and provide an onsite Erosion Sediment Control (ESe) Supervisor approved by the Director of Public Works, who possesses a Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Certification by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). This ESC Supervisor shall be available for the duration of the project. The qualifications and responsibilities of the ESC Supervisor are outlined in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City of Federal Way Addendum. The Director of Public Works may further limit clearing and grading activities on the site based on recommendations from the ESC Supervisor and requirements of the KCSWDM. 9.3.2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. A construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided by CFC and reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of any construction permits or authorizations. Construction phasing shall be included in this plan. CFC has proposed several BMP's which shall be captured in the SWPP plan including, but not limited to, confining refueling and equipment maintenance to a hard-surface staging area with spill containment features and a spill clean-up kit, and pipe slope drains used to convey storm water over steep slopes. 9.3.3 Clearing and Grading. Clearing and grading shall be allowed only pursuant to a phased construction plan approved by the Director of Public Works. Clearing and grading shall occur only between May 1 and September 30 unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. 9.4 Traffic Mitigation. CFC shall perform, as part of Project construction and prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy unless otherwise noted, the following traffic mitigation as required and approved by the Director of Public Works. 9.4.1 CFC shall reconstruct 18th Avenue South from the existing berm to S 344th Street to a Type It streetmodified street section, consisting of 4Q-..24 foot wide street with vertical curbs, and gutters, 4 foot planter strips with street tree~;, 6~-foot sidewalks, and two additional street lights mounted on existing power poles, and traffic calming elements, in a 60 foot right of way, consistent with the attached Exhibit G-1. Traffic calming elements shall be installed. including 2 speed humps. 1 crosswalk. bulb outs at the intersection of 18th Avenue South and S 341 5t Street and 18th Avenue South and S 344th Street to narrow the throat width of 18th Avenue South to 20 feet. and street signage shaH be installed to address no through truck tramc. children playing. speed humps. crosswalk and speed limit. 9.4.2 CFC shall improve S 344th Street from 16th Avenue S to 18th Avenue S consistent with the attached Exhibit G-2. Construction shall consist of Type R Street. The north 6 become frustrated and learn to use alternate routes. The EIS analysis assumed that most of these trips would leave the site to the north onto S 3361h Street, and most would head west on S 336th Street to SR 99 and turn left to 16th Avenue S or continue straight on SR 99. Although no capacity improvements appear warranted as a result of this assignment, staff has significant concerns about the safety of the 16th Avenue S / S 341 sl Place intersection under this scenario. It has been the City's experience that unsignalized intersections operating near capacity have a higher than average collision rate. This is due primarily to increased driver frustration, leading to drivers choosing gaps in opposing traffic that are inadequate to complete the maneuver safely. Therefore, this alternative is not recommended. 47. The roundabout alternative would provide adequate levels of service. In order to accommodate planned traffic volumes, it would have a 3-lane roundabout with an inscribed diameter of 200 feet. As SR 99 is a state highway, any intersection modifications would have to be approved by WSDOT. To date, WSDOT has not approved any three-lane roundabouts on the state highway system, and its historical reluctance to approve 2-lane roundabouts casts doubt as to whether this would be a viable alternative at this time. In addition, a roundabout would need right-of-way on both sides of SR 99, impacting developed properties on the east side of SR 99. Therefore, this alternative is not recommended. 48. Providing a connection between South 34151 Place and South 344th Street reroutes traffic around the intersection of l61h Avenue South and South 34151 Place, and takes advantage of a project planned by the City to construct traffic signals on South 3441h Street at 16th Avenue South and at SR 99. 49. Potential locations to provide this connection between South 341 st Place and South 3441h Street are 2151 Avenue South and 18th Avenue South. Due to the presence of wetlands, three different alignments for 21 st Avenue South were considered in the EIS. An alignment along the existing right-of-way would impact wetlands and result in two stream crossings; an alignment to the east would cross the wetland at its narrowest width, but would still impact wetlands and result in two stream crossings; and an alignment to the west would avoid impacting the stream and wetlands, but would require right-of-way acquisition from the truck parking lot. 50. Eighteenth Avenue South has continuous right-of-way, but is not a through street due to an existing temporary benn. Eighteenth Avenue South provides a preferred alternative to 21 5t Avenue South due to the wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed 2151 Avenue South alignments and the transitional nature of the residential neighborhood on 18th Avenue South. Pursuant to the F'NCC, thc applicant \yi11 construct 1St!! "A.venue South as a Type R street betv.een the southern extent of the street improvements in Kits Corner Business Park and South 311t!! Street. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1477, the required right-of-way width may be modified by the Director of Public Works to avoid right-of-way acquisition and lessen the impact to the neighborhood, and utility undergrounding will not be required. Therefore, the applicant will construct l81h Avenue South as a modified street section between the southern extent of the street improvements in Kits Comer Business Park and South 344th Street. 51. The rerouting of trips using this connection on 18th Avenue South would add 417 trips to the east leg of South 344th Street east of 16th Avenue South, and 128 trips between 16th Avenue South and SR 99 during the Sunday after service peak hour. Both of these intersections are currently unsignalized. The addition of these trips would create LOS failure and safety issues associated with unsignalized intersections operating over capacity. Staff has detennined that these intersections would not operate safely if the project's trips impacted these intersections prior to the completion of the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) project scheduled for 2008 that would add left-turn Christian Faith Center Files CP A99-0004, 02-102271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to AdoPtion Ordinance Page 8 I lack of impacts by the use of flagger control compared to the other alternatives, flagger control is the recommended mitigation for this location. The applicant will provide flagger control of this driveway during Sunday peak hours, subject to conditions of the Right-of-Way Activity Permit to be issued by the Department of Public Works. 56. The EIS suggests as a mitigation measure to minimize the intrusion of project-generated traffic into residential neighborhoods to the north of the site an education program to influence route choices by notices, announcements, and new member orientation used to educate drivers. Pursuant to FWCP Policy TP5, the applicant will provide an ongoing education program to minimize traffic intrusion into adjacent residential neighborhoods. 57. The EIS discusses a broad range of traffic calming tools that might be used to discourage through traffic from using 20th Avenue South north of the site, and to maintain reasonable speeds for a residential neighborhood for those that do choose to use 20th Avenue South. Based on the analysis of the alternatives by staff, a through movement diverter is recommended and will be placed at the intersection of 20th Avenue South and South 336th Street, and is intended to prohibit through movements on 20th Avenue South across South 336th Street. All other movements at the intersection would be permitted. The design will accommodate transit turning movements and full access for emergency vehicles, making it possible that smaller vehicles could still drive around the diverter. 58. Despite the diverter, some project-generated traffic may still be expected to use 20th Avenue South to the north of the site. Therefore, there is still some need to discourage the use of 20th Avenue South through traffic calming north of the site, even with the through movement diverter. Traffic circles have been found by many agencies to significantly reduce intersection collisions and slightly reduce midblock vehicle speeds. In order to be effective at reducing speeds and encourage yielding behavior, deflection of the driver's path upon entry to the traffic circle is required. At a three-legged intersection such as at South 332nd Street, additional pavement widening may be required to provide for adequate deflection and provide positive guidance to the driver. In no case should additional right-of-way be required. Pursuant to FWCP Policy TP5, the applicant will place the through movement diverter at the intersection at South 336th Street, and yield-controlled traffic circles at South 330th Street and South 332nd Street to reduce intersection collisions and midblock vehicle speeds. 59. Neighborhood Traffic Meetings were held June 3, 2004 and June 25. 2004 with the residents on 18th Avenue South to determine the best solution for improving 18th Avenue South. Based on the discussions at the meetings, rfhe residential segment of 18th Avenue South will be improved to a Type Rmodifìed street section, consisting of 24 foot wide street with vertical curb and gutter, 5-foot sidewalks and 2 additional street lights mounted on existing power poles. Traffic calming elements will be installed, including two speed humps, 1 crosswalk, bulb outs at the intersection of 18th Avenue Sand S 341 st Street and 18úl Avenue Sand S 344tl1 Street to nalTOW the throat width of 18th Avenue S to 20 feet, and street signage to address no through truck traffic, children playing, speed humps, crosswalk and speed limit will be installed. The applicant has proposed that the existing bulb in the right of way where the existing cuI de sac bulb is located be used as a location for a median island to creatc a chicane effect, and staff proposes that curb returns on 18#1 f. venue South be bulbed out into the interseotions at South 3Hst Place and South 311#1 Street to reduoe the potential for trucks to use 18#1 LA. venue South through the residential neighborhood. Staff also recommends signage be placed to prohibit trucks on 18#1 Avenue South between South 311 st---Pla€e and South 311#1 Street and 1\\'0 speed humps be installed. ,II.. Neighborhood Traffic Meeting was held June 3, 2001, and Staff '.vill work with the residents on 18th LA. venue South to determine the best solution for impro'ling 18#1 LA. venue South. Christian Faith Center Files CPA99-0004, 02-1O2271-00-UP, 02-102272-00-SE Statement of Facts and Conclusions - Exhibit D to Adoption Ordinance Page 10 I MEETING DATE: July 20, 2004 ITEM# -r(h) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE CHAPTER 22, ARTICLE XI, TO ADD A FREEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: D ~ D CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ...,.................. .......................................................................... ..........,.............,....,................................................................,...........,......,..... ...........................,....................,.............. .............. .............................,........................,...................................-................................................................................................... ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft Resolution to disapprove the code amendment to adopt a Freeway Commercial (Fe) zoning classification; 2) June 1,2004, City Council Agenda Bill requesting Council direction whether to prepare an adoption ordinance or a resolution for disapproval. The following documents are on file with the City Clerk and are available for City Council review in the City Council Conference Room: 1) May 19,2004, Memorandum to the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe) with Table 1 and Exhibits A-N. 2) April 27, 2004, Memorandum to the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe) with Exhibits 1-20. ........................................................................................................ .................. .............. ..............................................................................................................................................-.....................,...........................................................................................'..'.............................................. .............,.....,..,............................ SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way has hired consultants to prepare two market studies, one for the entire City in 2000 and one for the City Center in 2002. The City also hired a consultant to prepare a Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study. These studies found that there is adequate supply of vacant and underdeveloped commercial land in the City and in the P AA. However, they recognized the potential of zoning for certain categories of retail development not currently being captured in Federal Way as a way to increase the tax base within the City and the PAA. The proposed Freeway Commercial (Fe) zoning classification is intended to capture the type of retail development that is presently locating outside of Federal Way, while not competing with the existing zones that already allow retail uses. Any parcel five acres or more that borders the 1...5/SR-18 or 1-5/South 320th Street interchanges, and is both visible and accessible from these interchanges, would be eligible to apply for the FC zoning designation. This zoning designation could be applied to parcels within the P AA or within the City. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on March 17, April 7, and April 21, 2004, and recommended to the council that the amendments as proposed by staff and amended by the Planning Commission be approved (Exhibits 7...20 of April 27, 2004, Memorandum to the LUTe). The LUTC discussed the Planning Commission's recommendations during public meetings on May 3, and May 24, 2004. At the May 24th meeting, the LUTC made a motion to forward the proposed amendments to add a new Freeway Commercial zoning classification to the City Council with a recommendation to table it. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCe) Section 22-541, the City Council has the following options: 1. Approve the proposal by adopting an appropriate ordinance; 2. Modify and approve the proposal by adopting an appropriate ordinance; 3. Disapprove the proposal by resolution; or 4. Refer the proposal back to the planning commission for further proceedings. During the June 1, 2004, City Council meeting, the City Council gave staff direction to prepare a resolution disapproving the proposed Freeway Commercial designation for action by the Council on July 20, 2004. .................................--......,..--,......--....................--....................................... --...------..........--..----...-.......----,........-...........................--......----.----..----.........----....,---...............--........--.....--.....--.-.--..........-......................' CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: See above. ....--.......,.................-.....-...-.....-..........---...... --....-..--....-........... ..............-........----......-....--..-...-...--..------......., PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the resolution to disapprove the proposed Freeway Commercial zoning designation." CITY MANAGER APPROV AL, ~ .. ,...,--.. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST READING ENACTMENT READING ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # t\DOCUMENT\Freeway Commercial Zoning District\City Council\070604 Council Agenda Bill.doc/06/18/2004 3:04 PM RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DISAPPROVING THE PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) TO ADD A FREEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way adopted Ordinance No. 96-270 in July, 1996, which significantly revised the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22 (Zoning); and WHEREAS, FWCC Section 22-520 provides that the City Council shall review City- initiated changes to the text of the comprehensive plan concurrently with docketed comprehensive plan amendment requests and may review City-initiated changes to the text of FWCC Chapter 22 (Zoning) from time to time at the City Council's discretion; and WHEREAS, FWCC Section 22-528 provides for amendments to the text of FWCC Chapter 22 if: the City finds that a proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; the proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, or welfare; and the proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City; and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance on the proposed Freeway Commercial zoning classification on February 18, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the proposed code amendments on March 17, 2004, continued its public hearing to April 7, 2004, held its deliberations on April 21, 2004, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Land UsefTransportation Committee (LUTC) of the Federal Way City Council considered the code amendments relating to a new Freeway Commercial zoning classification on May 3, 2004, and May 24, 2004, and forwarded a recommendation to table it to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the LUTe's recommendation relating to the proposed Freeway Commercial code amendments on June 1, 2004, and gave staff direction to . prepare a resolution disapproving the proposed Freeway Commercial zoning classification for action by the City Council on July 20, 2004. Res. #_, Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Federal Way does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Findings. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following findings: A. Amendments to FWCC Chapter 22 to add a new zoning classification òr Freeway Commercial will not result in any incentives for development due to the limited uses proposed to be allowed in this zone; B. Amendments to FWCC Chapter 22 to add a new zoning classification of Freeway Commercial is not needed since the existing Community Business zoning classification allows all of the uses proposed to be allowed in the Freeway Commercial zone; C. Amendments to FWCC Chapter 22 to add a new zoning classification of Freeway Commercial would result in properties having to go through a lengthy comprehensive plan amendment process in order to obtain this designation; D. Vacant land meeting the criteria for designation as Freeway Commercial are located adjacent to residentially zoned areas; therefore, amendments to FWCC Chapter 22 to add a new zoning classification of Freeway Commercial will not protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses; E. Amendments to FWCC Chapter 22 to add a new zoning classification of Freeway Commercial will not protect and will adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare; and F. Amendments to FWCC Chapter 22 to add a new zoning classification of Freeway Commercial is inconsistent with the intent and purpose of FWCC Chapter 22 (Zoning) to provide for and promote the health, safety, and welfare, and are not in the best interest of the general public because they will provide the potential to detract from existing commercial areas. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria applicable to the proposal: 1. The proposed FWCC text amendments are inconsistent with the following provisions of the comprehensive plan: Diversify the economic base by encouraging higher paying white collar and technical jobs while preserving and enhancing the strong retail base. Strengthen the City Center as the City's focal point for commercial and community activities. LUP15 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses. Res. # -' Page 2 LUP39 Encourage auto-oriented large bulk retailers to locate in the South 348tl1 Street Community Business area. 2. The proposed amendments are inconsistent with the criteria set forth in FWCC Section 22-528 because they are inconsistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; do not bear a substantial relation to public health, safety, or welfare; and are not in the best interest of the residents of the City.. Section 3. Amendment. In light of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law contained in Sections 1 and 2 above, the City Council declines to adopt the proposed Freeway Commercial zoning classification and declines to adopt language in the comprehensive plan to support this classification. Section 4. Severability. The prOVISIOns of this resolution are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this resolution, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the resolution, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way at a regular meeting of the City day of ,2004. Council on the ApPROVED: Mayor, Dean McColgan A TIEST: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson Res. # -' Page 3 FILED WITH THE CiTY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CiTY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: RESOLUTION NO.: Res. #_, Page 4 I:\DOCUMENT\Freeway Commercial Zoning District\City Council\O60404 Resolution.doc MEETING DATE: June I, 2004 ITEM# ]lI1 (¿) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE CHAPTER 22, ARTICLE XI, TO ADD A FREEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: D D [8J CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ,....,.,...........,....--,...........................,........,.................,.............................. ............,.,......--. ,.. .--.,----... ... ..,...........................,.,...,..............--.."..,'...,..................,.,.....,..........,..,.,..--....--.................................,..........,.......,.......,.......,..... ...,..................................,............,.,.,...". ,. .......... .....................,...............,.............,.....,...,.... ATTACHMENTS: 1) May 19,2004, Memorandum to the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe) with Table 1 and Exhibits A-N. 2) April 27, 2004, Memorandum to the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe) with Exhibits 1-20. .....,..,....--.....................,.........................'........,...,..........,.......,............................--.......",......,............. ,..,., .,......................................,.,....,......................,...,...,..,..,.,....,...--------.,.,.----...,........,............--....................,.................--....--.....,.................,............. ,.............,......,..............,.......-- ....,.,...,....,.........................,........,..,.......,.,.............. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way has hired consultants to prepare two market studies, one for the entire City in 2000 and one for the City Center in 2002. The City also hired a consultant to prepare a Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study. These studies found that there is adequate supply of vacant and underdeveloped commercial land in the City and in the P AA. However, they recognized the potential of zoning for certain categories of retail development not currently being captured in Federal Way as a way to increase the tax base within the City and the PAA. The proposed Freeway Commercial (Fe) zoning classification is intended to capture the type of retail development that is presently locating outside of Federal Way, while not competing with the existing zones that already allow retail uses. Any parcel five acres or more that borders the 1-5/SR-18 or 1-5/South 320th Street interchanges, and is both visible and accessible ÍÌom these interchanges, would be eligible to apply for the FC zoning designation. This zoning designation could be applied to parcels within the P AA or within the City. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on March 17, April 7, and April 21, 2004, and recommended to the council that the amendments as proposed by staff and amended by the Planning Commission be approved (Exhibits 7-20 of April 27, 2004, Memorandum to the LUTe). ,....... ................................,.......................,.,...........................,.,.......----... ..,.................,.......,.,..... ,--.,.... ... .......... ......,.,.....--...,...,.....,..,...........,..,.....,...............................................,...............,....,.--.,..,.--..--....,.............................,.,............,."..--.,..,.,.. ,'....... ...., .......,........,.,...,......,.........................,.,...,.....--,.....,...................... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the Planning Commission's recommendations during public meetings on May 3, and May 24, 2004. At the May 24, 2004 meeting, the LUTC made a motion to forward the proposed amendments to add a new Freeway Commercial zoning classification to the City Council with a recommendation to table it. Purs\lant to Federal Way City Code (FWCe) Section 22-541, the City Council has the following options: f 1. Approve the proposal by adopting an appropriate ordinance; ò< 2. Modify and approve the proposal by adopting an appropriate ordinance; 3. Disapprove the proposal by resolution; or 4. Refer the proposal back to the planning commission for further proceedings. PROPOSED MOTION: Option I: "I move to direct staff to prepare an ordinance approving the proposed FTeeway Commercial zoning designation for first reading on July 6, 2004." Option 2: "I move to direct staff to prepare a resolution disapproving the proposed Freeway Commercial zoning designation for action on July 20, 2004." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: @ ~ APPROVED OpÞM t ... ~A~ (P---I 0 DENIED D T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST READING ENACTMENT READING ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # 7i/rt&r 1:\2004 Code Amendments\Freeway Zone\City Council\052004 AGENDA BILLdocl08/25/2003 10:55 AM ~ Federal Way CITY OF MEM 0 RAND UM May 19,2004 TO: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) David '1os~ge' Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner hI"'" Janet Shull, Planning Consultant ¡J~C/ }- VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: Follow-up Research for Amendments to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) and Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22 to add a Freeway Commercial Zoning Classification (File No. 04-100812-00-UP) MEETING DATE: May 24, 2004 I. BACKGROUND This is a follow-up to the May 3,2004, Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe) meeting during which a proposed new commercial zoning designation. Freeway Commercial Zone (Fe), was discussed. During this meeting, staff presented the Planning Commission's recommendation, which was to adopt the proposed FC zoning designation and amend the FWCP and FWCC as necessary to implement the new zone. The LUTC discussed the proposed FC zoning classification and requested staff to research and respond to the following: . Compare the proposed FC zone allowable uses and development standards with those of other jurisdictions that allow freeway commercial uses. Compare the proposed FC zone allowable uses and development standards with those of the Community Business (Be) zone. Research whether to allow pole signs in the Freeway Commercial zone and whether a 25 foot tall sign would be tall enough to be visible from the freeway. . . II. DISCUSSION OF RESEARCH FINDINGS A. How does the proposed FC development uses and standards compare with those of similarly zoned areas in other jurisdictions? Staff compared the codes for comparable freeway oriented zones for Renton, Olympia, Fife, Bellingham, Issaquah, Burien, and Sumner relative, to the proposed FC zone. A summary of the permitted uses and development standards for these cities is shown in Table I. The following highlights how the development standards compare to each other. 1. Permitted Uses: Most communities allowed a wider range of uses than the FC zone as presently drafted. The range of allowable uses in other cities was more similar to Federal Way's BC zone than the proposed FC zone. Please refer to Table I for a complete list of allowable uses in the Federal Way BC zone. Renton, Olympia, and Issaquah allow uses similar to Federal Way's BC zone. Comparable zones reviewed in Bellingham and Burien are more similar to Federal Way's Business Park (BP) zone in that the focus is more on business park type uses. 2. Minimum Lot Size: In the proposed FC zone, there would be no minimum lot size except for a five-acre minimum if the proposed use is new vehicle sales. Most of the communities surveyed have no minimum lot size established for comparable zoning districts. The City of Burien requires a minimum two-acre site size for application of the special planning area zone. and a minimum 15-acre site size with a minimum of three dealers for auto sales. 3. Lot Coverage: Most communities reviewed established a maximum lot coverage ranging from 65 to 85 percent. The proposed FC zone establishes no maximum lot coverage; it is determined by application of development standards. (This is consistent with other commercial zoning districts in Federal Way.) 4. Maximum Building Height: Maximum building height ranged from 35 to 50 feet for similar zones. The average hovered around 40 feet. Issaquah has a base maximum of 35 feet, but will allow up to 65 feet under certain conditions. Bellingham listed no height limit. The proposed FC zone would allow a maximum of 35 feet with up to 55 feet allowed under certain conditions. The height limit would be 30 feet within 100 feet of a residenÜal zone. While none of the other communities identified a reduction in height limit for buildings near a residential zone, the proposed height requirement for the FC zone is consistent with height regulations for other Federal Way non-residential zones. 5. Setbacks: Minimum front yard setbacks ranged from none to 30 feet. The proposed minimum for the FC zone is 20 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks ranged from none to 20 feet. The proposed minimum for the FC zone is five feet. Minimum rear yard setbacks ranged from none to 20 feet. The proposed minimum for the FC zone is five feet. Special Requirements When Adjacent to Residential: Three out of the seven communities reviewed provide for an increased setback when development is adjacent to a residenÜal zone. The increased setback requirements ranged from 15 to 50 feet. The proposed FC zone requires a minimum 20-foot setback from an adjacent residential zone, For new vehicle sales, the minimum would be 50 feet. Of the cities examined, only Burien requires a 50- foot setback when abutting an existing residential area. I . Ißurien's setback requirement is enforced through its landscaping requirements, Amendments to FWCP/FWCC - FC Zone Follow-up Research File #O4-100812-00-UP Page 2 6. Landscaping: Adjacent to Right-of-Way: Most communities required a 10-foot wide landscape area adjacent to public right-of-way. Renton and Burien require up to 15 and 25 feet respectively, depending on the road classification. Burien had no landscaping requirements along a property line abutting a freeway. The proposal for the FC zone is 10 feet of Type III landscaping.2 Perimeter When not Adjacent to Right-of-Way: Some communities did not identify any perimeter landscaping unless adjacent to a right-of-way or residential area. For those that did, either five or ten-foot wide landscaped areas were specified. The proposal for the FC zone is five feet of Type III. Adjacent to Residential Zone: The range was quite varied with anything from five to 50 feet. Some communities require a combination of plantings with wood or masonry fences when adjacent to residential. The proposal for the FC zone is 20 feet of Type 1.3 7. Signs: Staff focused on the comparison on whether or not freestanding pole signs were allowed and the maximum height allowances. Renton and Fife allow pole signs up to 40 feet tall. Bellingham allows a maximum height of 35 feet, except where development is adjacent to 1-5 and then the height is limited to 20 feet. Olympia, Burien, and Sumner allowances fall into an overall range of 15 to 35 feet. Issaquah only listed allowances for monument signs. The proposal for the FC zone is a maximum of 15 feet if the subject property is above the freeway elevation, and 25 feet above the elevation of the freeway if the subject property is lower in elevation than the freeway. Please refer to Table I for comparison of allowable sign area. 8. Parking: Parking in most communities is determined by use rather than zone. There were no great differences in how parking requirements were addressed. 9. Design Review: Most communities, like Federal Way, require administrative design review of commercial development. Staff did not review the specifics of the different programs. 10. Noise, Light, and Glare: Most communities have adopted standard guidelines to address noise, light and glare. There wére no specific requirements for development within the zones that were reviewed. New vehicle sales in the FC zone can potentially have noise impacts associated with the maintenance shop and outdoor speaker systems. In addition, based on the locational criteria, FC zones can potentially locate adjacent to residential areas. As a resuTt, specific language is proposed to prevent noise associated with these uses from being heard on adjacent residential areas. 2 Type III landscaping is described as a "visual buffer," which is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets and main arterials and between compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of parking areas and building elevations. 3 Type 1 landscaping is described as a "solid screen," which is intended to provide a solid sight barrier to totally separate incompatible land uses. Amendments to FWCP/FWCC - FC Zone Follow-up Research File #04-1 00812-00-UP Page 3 B. SUMMARY OF COMPARISON WITH OTHER COMMUNITIES Overall, the proposed standards for the FC zone fall within the range of development standards revIewed for other communities. The primary differences staff found are as follows: . Number of Uses Allowed: With the exception of Bellingham and Burien, which focus more on business park type development, most of the comparables reviewed allowed a wider range of uses similar to Federal Way's BC zone, but broader than those proposed to be allowed in the FC zone. . Minimum Lot Size: Most communities did not specify a minimum lot size, or if so, it was minimal. The FC zone would require a minimum five-acre lot size for a vehicle sales use (otherwise no minimum). Burien was one exception that had more stringent requirements than Federal Way for vehicle sales. . Minimum Setback From a Residential Area: In the case of new vehicle sales, the proposed 50-foot setback for the FC zone is about double what other communities require (with the exception of Burien, which also requires 50 feet). However, for all other uses in the FC zone, the 20-foot setback is similar to the other communities' requirements. . Noise, Light, and Glare: No other community that was studied was found to have a noise requirement similar to that proposed for the FC zone for new vehicle sales. How do the proposed FC development standards compare with development standards for the BC zone? The LUTC was most interested in how the proposed FC zone compares with the existing BC zone. Table I provides a comparison of the FC and BC zones. 1. Permitted Uses: ATT of the uses proposed to be allowed in the FC zone are already allowed in the BC zone. Although outlet maTTs are specifically called out as an allowable use in the FC zone, it would also be allowed in the BC zone as a general retail use. 2. Minimum Lot Size: The BC zone does not have a minimum lot size. The proposal for the FC zone is no minimum lot size except for new vehicle sales, which would require a five- acre mlmmum. 3. Lot Coverage: All the commercial zones, including the BC zone, do not have maximum lot coverage. Lot coverage is determined by application of the other development regulations. 4. Maximum Height: The height limit of 55 feet for the FC zone is consistent with what is currently allowed in the BC zone. 5. Setbacks: Uses in the BC zone that are adjacent to a residential zone must maintain a minimum 20-foot setback. The FC zone proposes a minimum 20-foot setback from residential areas unless the development is new vehicle sales and then it is 50 feet. File #O4-100812-00-UP Page 4 Amendments to FWCP/FWCC - FC Zone Follow-up Research c. The proposed minimum front, side and rear setbacks for the FC zone is 20 feet, five feet, and five feet, respectively. Setbacks established in the BC zone depend on the specific use and ranges from none to 50 feet, depending on the use. For example, in the BC zone, a 40- foot minimum front yard setback is required for vehicle service stations. 6. Landscaping: The proposed landscaping along a right-of-way within the FC zone is 10 feet of Type III. The existing requirement for the BC zone is five feet of Type III. The requirement along a property line abutting a residential zone is 20 feet of Type I for the FC zone and 15 feet of Type I for the BC zone. Perimeter landscaping for other lot line conditions is five feet of Type III landscaping for the both the proposed FC zone, as well as the existing BC zone. 7. Signs: The BC zone allows for a pole sign up to 25 feet tall, with a maximum sign face of 400 square feet (200 square feet per side) under specific circumstances. If these circumstances cannot be met, then a medium profile sign is allowed up to 12 feet in height with a maximum sign face of 80 square feet (40 square feet per side) for single-tenant sites and 128 square feet (64 square feet per side) for multi-tenant sites. The proposal for the FC zone is to al1ow one highway profile sign (pole sign) per subject property. This sign could be a maximum of 15 feet if the subject property is above the freeway elevation, and 25 feet above the elevation of the freeway if the subject property is lower in elevation than the freeway. The Freeway Commercial sign could have a maximum sign area of 600 square feet (maximum of300 square feet per face) if the elevation of the site is below the elevation of the freeway, and 400 square feet (maximum of200 square feet per face) if the elevation of the site is above the elevation of the freeway. 8. Parking: Parking requirements are determined by use rather than zone and there is no difference between the proposed FC and the existing zone. 9. Design Review: All non-residential development must comply with the City's design review requirements regardless of zone. 10. Noise, Light, and Glare: The BC zone has a noise requirement for veterinary clinics that is similar to that proposed for new vehicle sales and related uses in the FC zone. The BP and OP zones state that truck maneuvering and similar noise generating activities be located as far away from adjacent residential zones as possible. The BC zone requires that for auto body, painting, service, and repair uses, "... building layout and design mitigate impact of dust, fumes, noise, glare, odor, or any other discharge on neighboring uses and natural systems.. .." The BC zone states that the hours of operation of commercial uses may be limited to reduce impacts on residential areas. The proposed noise-related requirements for the FC zone incorporate a combination of language from al1 of these zones. Research whether to allow pole signs in the Freeway Commercial zone and whether a 25 foot tall sign would be tall enough to be visible from the freeway 1. Sign Height: As discussed above in Section II.B.7 above, the proposal for the FC zone is to al1ow one highway profile sign (pole sign) per subject property. This sign could be a maximum of 15 feet if the subject property is above the freeway elevation, and 25 feet above the elevation of the freeway if the subject property is lower in elevation than the File #04-1 00812-00-UP Page 5 Amendments to FWCP/FWCC ~ FC Zone Follow-up Research freeway. The FC sign could have a maximum sign area of 600 square feet (maximum of 300 square feet per face) if the elevation of the site is below the elevation of the freeway, and 400 square feet (maximum of200 square feet per face) if the elevation of the site is above the elevation of the freeway. The following pictures show a freeway-oriented sign in Bellingham that is approximately 50 to 60 feet tall. The Bellingham sign code allows the sign to have a total sign are of 600 square feet (300 square feet per sign face) and be 20 feet taller than the freeway elevation at the closest driving lane. Therefore, a sign that exceeds the freeway elevation by 25 feet would be visible from the freeway. CITY OF BELLINGHAM I j Sign height above street level, will depend on the difference between elevation of the site and the freeway. 2. Whether Pole Signs Should be Allowed: When preparing the proposed Freeway Commercial sign provisions, staffresearched a number of other cities' freeway-oriented sign codes and chose the City of Bellingham's sign ordinance as a model. Bellingham allows signs to be visible from the freeway and allows the maximum sign height to be based off the elevation of the freeway. The original language proposed for the FC zone sign provisions required the design of the posts for a pole sign to be compatible with the architecture of the primary structure on the site. This is similar to existing language for freestanding signs in the "High Profile" category, which allows 25-foot tall pole signs. In the "High Profile" category, the base must be designed to complement the architecture of the primary structures on site or to use some kind of textured material. However, after meeting with sign contractors to discuss the new FC sign provisions, this language was taken out due to the response we received regarding this requirement. Sign Amendments to FWCP/FWCC - FC Zone Follow-up Research File #O4-100812-00-UP Page 6 contractors commented that the base would have to be custom designed, which is not a problem for a 25-foot pole sign, because the base itself is usualTy 10 feet talT or less. However, the freeway commercial signs could potentially be as tall as 50 to 70 feet due to the topography of the land adjacent to the freeway. As a result the base for a freeway commercial sign could be 50 feet or taller. In this circumstance, the base would have to be pre-textured and custom designed into various sections just to complete the instalTation. Special engineering would be required to complete a step down for the wind load. Such a requirement would warrant a significant cost to the client, as welT as pose significant maintenance chalTenges, since a boom truck would be required. After these discussions, it was decided to alTow pole signs without the requirement for architectural compatibility for freeway commercial signs. During the May 3,2004 meeting, some members of the LUTC voiced a concern about alTowing pole signs in the FC zone and asked staff to look at some of the signs in Fife. As a result of this research, and as shown in the following pictures, it appears that 40-foot talT signs can be designed in such a way to be architecturally compatible with the primary structure on the site. . ,..' . .....("¡;';~J.~il'K-III;:~;:';¡¡J!' ,,', ~:. ;Õ,~ ."-."'"" ~ .iÏiiiiii' ,.~-:; ""}.;;" ".~....,.,.-~~ Both of the signs are located along 1-5 in Fife. They are 40-feet talT and 250 square feet per sign face. Based on the research, staff proposes to add similar language that currently exists in the design criteria for sign bases. Please refer to Page 3 of Exhibit A (shown as double underTined). In addition, staff proposes to add a cap of 60 feet for the height of pole signs. As currently drafted, there is no cap on the height for the FC (pole) signs. Consequently, the Costco site, which is the lowest known elevation at 62 feet below the freeway elevation at the closest driving lane, could have an 87-foot talT sign. However, there are other higher elevations on the Costco site (31 feet below the freeway elevation), which could accommodate a pole sign. This would result in a 56-foot talT sign. Please refer to Page 3 of Exhibit A (shown as double underTined) for the proposed new language capping the maximum sign height at 60 feet. Amendments to FWCP/FWCC - FC Zone Follow-up Research File #04-1008 I 2-00-UP Page 7 III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that a New Freeway Commercial zone be adopted with the amendments as proposed by the Planning Commission, and with the two additional changes recommended above pertaining to architectural compatibility and maximum sign height. IV. COUNCIL ACTION The Committee has the following options: 1. Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed code amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend that the full Council modify and then approve the proposed code amendments as recommended by the LUTe. 3. Recommend that the full Council disapprove the proposed code amendments. 4. Recommend that the full Council send the proposed code amendments back to the Planning Commission for further review. Staff recommends that the LUTC recommend to the full Council Option No.2 above, that is, adoption ofthe Planning Commission's recommendations with the two changes. V. LAND UsEffRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The LUTC forwards the proposed amendment to the full Council for first reading as follows: As recommended by Planning Commission. As recommended by Planning Commission and amended by the LUTe. .:J,- 'T Ñ'Dk- - ~4~ r;é~ ~ ~~., ApPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTION: ~/~ Eric Faison, Member LIST OF EXHIBITS Table I Exhibit A Exhibits B-N Comparison Chart of City of Federal Way Proposed Freeway Commercial Zone, Existing Community Business Zone and Selected Other Cities Proposed Changes to Freeway Commercial Sign Code Planning Commission Recommendation L\DOCUMENnFreeway Commercial Zoning District\LUTC\O51404 Staff Report.doclO5!19/2004 9:53 AM Amendments to FWCP/FWCC - FC Zone Follow-up Research File #04-1 00812-00-UP Page 8 FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SIGNS EXHIBiT PAGE___' A . _S 22-1601 Signs in nonresidential zoning districts. (a) Freestanding signs. Permit applications for freestanding signs shaH be designated as qualifying for a high profile, medium profile, Øf low profile sign, or highway profile category A, based upon criteria regarding both the size and zoning designation of the development. The sign profile designation shaH control the sign types, sign height, sign area and number of signs allowed. Separate parcels or pads for single-tenant buildings that comply with all zoning requirements for single-tenant parcels, excluding access, and are not otherwise tied to an adjacent multi-tenant center by virtue of architectural style or theme, are permitted one freestanding monument or pedestal sign not to exceed a maximum sign area of 80 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 40 square feet. (l) High profile sign. . a. Criteria. A subject property meeting all of the foHowing criteria is permitted a high profile freestanding sign: 1. A minimum of 250 feet of frontage on one public right-of-way; 2. A zoning designation of city center core (CC-C) or city center frame (CC-F), or community business (BC); 3. A multiuse complex; and 4. A minimum site of 15 acres in size. b. Sign types. The following sign types are aHowed for a high profile sign: 1. Pylon or pole signs; provided, however, that any pylon or pole sign must have more than one pole or structural support; 2. Pedestal signs; 3. Monument signs; 4. Tenant directory signs; and 5. Kiosks. Sign content for any pylori or pole sign, or for any pedestal or monument sign in lieu of a pylon or pole sign, may include electronic changeable messages, center identification signs and/or changeable copy signs. Any high profile sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. c. Sign height. A high profile sign shall not exceed the following maximum heights: 1. Pylon or pole sign: Twenty-five feet; 2. Pedestal or monument signs: Twelve feet if in lieu of a pylon or pole sign. Otherwise, pedestal and monument signs shall not exceed five feet; 3. Tenant directory or kiosk signs: Six feet unless the sign is set back a minimum of 50 feet from any public right-of-way, in which case it may be 10 feet. d. Sign area. A high profile sign shall not exceed the following maximum sign areas: 1. Pylon or pole sign: 400 square feet for the total of sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 200 square feet; 2. Pedestal or monument signs: 128 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one face exceeding 64 square feet; 3. Tenant directory or kiosk signs: 15 square feet per sign face. e. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a high profile sign may have the following maximum number of signs: Page I FREEW A Y COMMERCIAL SIGr6XH I B rr P AGE___- 2 1. Pylon or pole sign: One sign unless the subject property has an additional 500 feet of street frontage for a total of 750 feet of aggregate frontage on any public rights-of-way, in which case the subject property will be allowed one additional high profile sign, not to exeeed a maximum of two such signs per subject property; 2. Pedestal or monument signs: If the pedestal or monument sign is in lieu of a pylon or pole sign, the number of signs allowed shall be determined pursuant to subsection (e)( 1) of this section. In addition, two monument signs which identify the name of any multiuse complex are allowed, per entrance from a public right-of-way, not to exceed five feet in height; and 3. Tenant directory or kiosk signs: One sign per frontage on a public right-of-way. (2) Medium profile sign. a. Criteria. A subject property that does not qualify for a high profile sign pursuant to subsection (a)(1) of this section and is not a low profile sign by being zoned office park (OP) or professional office (PO) pursuant to subsection (a)(3) of this section is permitted a medium profile freestanding sign. b. Sign types. The following sign types are allowed for a medium profile sign: 1. Pedestal signs; and 2. Monument signs. Sign content for any medium profile sign may include electronic changeable messages, center identification signs and/or changeable copy signs. Any medium profile sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. c. Sign height. The height of a medium profile sign shall be calculated at the rate of 0.75 feet in the sign height for every 10 lineal feet of frontage on a public right-of-way; provided, however, that sign height shall be calculated at the rate of one and one-half feet in sign height for every 10 lineal feet of frontage on a public right-of-way for any multi-tenant complex; and provided further, that such sign shall not exceed a maximum height of 12 feet and every applicant is entitled to a minimum height of five feet. d. Sign area. For any multi-tenant complex, sign area allowed for a medium profile signs shall be calculated at the rate of two square feet per lineal foot of frontage on a public right-of- way not to exceed a maximum sign area of 128 square feet for the total of all sign faces on each permitted sign with no one sign face exceeding 64 square feet. For other uses, sign area allowed for medium profile sign shall be calculated at the rate of one square foot per lineal foot of frontage on a public right-of-way not to exceed a maximum sign area of 80 square feet for the total of all sign faces on each permitted sign with no one sign face exceeding 40 square feet. Notwithstanding the foregoing sign area calculations, every applicant is entitled to a minimum sign area of 50 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 25 square feet. e. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a medium profile sign may have one pedestal or monument sign for each street frontage. Each street frontage exceeding 300 linear feet and containing more than one vehicular access is permitted one additional freestanding sign. No subject property may contain more than three freestanding signs regardless of total linear street frontage and no one street frontage may have more than two freestanding signs. Freestanding signs shall be located a minimum distance of 200 feet from other freestanding signs on the same subject property. (3) Low profile sign. a. Criteria. A subject property located in the office park (OP) or professional office (PO) zone is permitted a low profile freestanding sign. b. Sign types. The following sign types are allowed for a low profile sign: Page 2 A :-.. -5 FREEW A Y COMMERCIAL SIGNS 1. Pedestal signs; 2. 11onument signs; and 3. Tenant directory signs. Sign content for any pedestal or monument sign may include center identification signs and/or changeable copy signs. Any low profile sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. e. Sign height. A low profile sign shall not exceed the following maximum heights: 1. Pedestal or monument signs: Five feet. 2. Tenant directory signs: Six feet unless the sign is set back a minimum of 50 feet from any public right-of-way, in which case it may be 10 feet. d. Sign area. 1. Pedestal or monument signs: Sign area allowed for a low profile sign shall be calculated at the rate of one square foot per lineal foot of frontage on a public right-of-way; provided, however, that a low profile sign shall not exceed a maximum sign area of 80 square feet for the total of all sign faces on each permitted sign with no one sign face exceeding 40 square feet, and every applicant is entitled to a minimum sign area of 50 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 25 square feet; 2. Tenant directory signs: 15 square feet per sign face. e. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a low profile sign may have the following maximum number of signs: 1. Pedestal or monument signs: One sign per frontage on a public right-of-way; and 2. Tenant directory signs: One sign per frontage on a public right-of-way. LXH' ,~:.) 'i-¡1'" t::. - 1_" PAGE ~ Pi ~:_--5 (4) Highway Profile Category A signs. In addition to the categories available in FWCC Section 22-1601(a)(1-3), a subject property may be permitted one of the following freestanding signs if it meets the criteria listed in highway profile category A below. a. Highway Profile Category A 1. Criteria. A subject property is permitted an additional highway profile category A freestanding sign ifthe subject property meets all of the following criteria: a. Abuts the right of way of Interstate 5; b. Is located in a zoning designation of freeway commercial (FC). 2. Sign types. A pylon or pole sign is allowed, provided, that any pylon or pole sign must have more than one pole or structural support~ and its design must be comDatible to the architecture of the mimarv structure on site. or to the mimarv sign( s) alreadv Dermitted on the subject mODerty and subject to the administrator's aDDroval. Sign content for any pylon or pole sign, may include center identification signs, provided, however, that all font sizes used are a minumum 2.5 feet tall. Trademarks or copy write symbols are exempt from the font size requirement. Any highway profile category A may be an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. Electronic changeable copy and/or changeable copy signs are not permitted. The sign must be oriented toward the freeway (not the off-ramps) and be located near the property line closest to the freeway and be visible from the freeway. 3. Sign height. A highway profile category A sign shall not exceed 25 feet above the elevation of the nearest driving lane of the freeway at a point nearest to the proposed location of the sign and shall be no taller than 60 feet above the avera2:e finshed Qfound elevation megsured at the midDoint of the sim base. The sign height shall be measured by a licensed surveyor and the applicant shall be responsible for providing the surveyor. Page 3 A 4- -~ If the subject property has an elevation that is higher than the nearest driving, lane of the freeway, then the sign shall be no taller than 15 feet above the average finshed ground elevation measured at the midpoint of the sign base. 4. Sign area. A highway profile category A sign shall not exceed 600 square feet for the total of sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 300 square feet. If the subject property has an elevation that is higher than the nearest driving lane of the freeway, then the sign area shall not exceed 400 square feet for the total of sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 200 square feet. 5. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a highway profile sign may have only one (T) highway profile category A sign per subject property. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for coordinating any such sign with the State of Washington Scenic Vistas Act. . FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SIGNS t:XH¡b~. PAGE -f41Œ2 Combined sign package for adjacent property owners. The owners of two or more properties that abut or are separated only by a vehicular access easement or tract may propose a combined sign package to the city. The city will review and decide upon the proposal using process III. The city may approve the combined sign package if it will provide more coordinated, effective and efficient signs. The allowable sign area, sign type, sign height and number of signs will be determined as if the applicants were one multi-tenant complex. (b) Building-mounted signs. (1) Sign types. The folTowing sign types may be building-mounted signs and are alTowed in all nonresidential zoning districts: a. Awning or canopy signs; b. Center identification signs; c. Changeable copy signs; d. Civic event signs; e. Directional signs, on-site; f. Electronic changeable message signs; g. Instructional signs; h. Marquee signs; i. Projecting signs; j. Tenant directory signs; k. Time and temperature signs; I. Under canopy signs; and m. WalT-mounted signs. Any building-mounted sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. (2) Sign height. No sign shall project above the roofline of the exposed building face to which it is attached. (3) Sign area. The total sign area of building-mounted signs for each business or tenant, excluding under canopy signs, shall not exceed seven percent of the exposed building face to which it is attached; provided, however, that no individual sign shall exceed a sign area of 240 square feet and every applicant is entitled to a minimum sign area of 30 square feet. A multi- tenant complex which does not use a freestanding sign may have two additional wall-mounted signs. No one sign may exceed seven percent of the exposed building face to which it is attached, to a maximum of 240 square feet per sign. This sign is in addition to any other tenant signs on that building face. Page 4 FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SIti~; b ,-,' PA,GE A- ,S 5 (4) Number of signs, The number of building-mounted signs permitted each user is dependent upon the surface area of the largest single exposed building face of his or her building as follows, excluding wall-mounted center identification signs: Largest Exposed Maximum Building Face Number of Signs Less than 999 sq. ft. 2 1,000 - 2,999 sq. f1. 3 3,000 - 3,999 sq. ft. 4 4,000 and over sq. f1. 5 Buildings with more than 4,000 square feet on any exposed building face, with several clearly differentiated departments, each with separate exterior entrances, are permitted one sign for each different department with a separate exterior entrance, in addition to the five permitted, No sign or signs may exceed the maximum area permitted for that building face except as may be specificaTly permitted by this code. However, an applicant is allowed to move allotted signs, as calculated in subsection (b)(4) from one building face to another. Each business or use shall be permitted under canopy signs in addition to the other permitted building-mounted signs subject to the size and separation requirements set forth in FWCC 22- I 599(c)(2)(w). (c) Sign area multipliers. The sign area and sign number allowed, as set forth in subsection (a)(l)(d) of this section for high profile signs, (a)(2)(d) of this section for medium profile signs, and (a)(3)(d) of this section for low profile signs and subsection (b)(3) of this section for building-mounted signs may be increased in the following instances; provided, however, that in no event shall the sign exceed the maximum sign area allowed: (I) If no signs on the subject property have internally lighted sign faces, then the total sign area allowed may be increased by 25 percent. (2) If all signs, other than center identification signs, are building-mounted signs, the total sign area aTlowed may be increased by 25 percent. (3) A time and temperature sign may be included with any sign and such time and temperature signs shall not be included for purposes of calculating maximum sign area or maximum number of signs. (Ord. No. 95-235, § 4, 6-6-95; Ord. No. 96-270, § 3(F), 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99- 348, § 5,9-7-99; Ord. No. 99-357, § 6,12-7-99) 1:\DOCUMENlìFreeway Commercial Zoning District\LUTC\Freeway Commercial Signs.doc Page 5 FWCP-ChapterTwo, land Use EXHIBIT_- PAGE___,_' Figure //-2 The Concept Plan Diagram Concentrate new development In the Highwa.y 99/1-5 COCTidOC". D<:vdop Inf.-astn.lctu~ to support-" cunidO4'" development. Tnnsfonn retail core into a new mixe<l-us., City Center. Pres.,rve and "",ltanc., existing single- family neighbomoöds. Creal"'- a netwon.: of par-ks and o~ ,--CO] ronido~ Diversify employment base by creating distinct ",",ploym.,nt areas "~ ~. --', ~-- ùeate new intensive residential - communities supported by transit:.. Provid., community ô1nd comlmen:i4J services t¡:) residential comm~.tnities. 1- ~ ¡: 7 , 2003 Camp Plan Update 11-3 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use EXHIBIT~._--;B . PAGE~..:)F-' RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE CHAPTERS 2.2 The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all FWCP chapters. Internal consistency among the chapters of the FWCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient use of limited resources. Below is a brief discussion of how the Land Use chapter relates to the other chapters of the FWCP. Economic Development Federal Way's economy is disproportionately divided. Based on PSRC's 2000 Covered Estimates by jurisdiction~ retail and service industries compose more than 70 percent of Federal Way's employment base. Covered estimates are jobs that are covered by unemployment insurance. Dependence on retail trade stems primarily from the City's evolution into a regional shopping destination for South King County and northeast Pierce County. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Tukwila and the Auburn SuperMall, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To improve Federal Way's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy. A diversified economy should achieve a better balance between jobs and housing and supports the City's quality of life. In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the following: . A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing. . Community Business and Business Park development in the South 348th Street area. . Continued development of West Campus. . Continued development of East Campus (Weyerhaeuser Corporate and Office Park properties). . Redevelopment and development of the SR-99 corridor into an area of quality commercial and mixed use development. . Continued use of design standards for non-singleJamily areas. . Freeway commercial development focusing on attracting and capturing those retail dollars presently being lost to other communities and complementing existing retail uses in the community. 2003 Camp Plan Update 11-4 FWCP-ChapterTwa, Land Use EXHIBIT_--S . PAGE-30F~ The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see the Comprehensive Plan Designations Map //-1). A complete discussion of economic development is set forth in the Economic Development chapter. Capital Facilities Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, parks and open space, and surface water management. Infrastructure and Urban Services The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and maintenance of parks and reereation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities and the maintenance of existing facilities. As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be financed by voter-approved bonds, impact fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), and money from the City's general fund. To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements. Water Availability Based on reports from the Lakehaven Utility District, the estimated available yield from the underlying aquifers is 10.1 million gallons per day (MGD, 10-year average based on average annual rainfall). The District controls which well to use, thus which aquifers are being pumped from, based on a number of considerations including water levels and rainfall. In order to reduce detrimental impacts to its groundwater supplies in the recent past, the District has also augmented its groundwater supplies with wholesale water purchased from the City of Tacoma through water system interties. In addition, the District has entered into a long-term agreement with the City of Tacoma and other South King County utilities to participate in the construction of Tacoma's Second Supply Project (a second water diversion from the Green River), which will provide additional water supplies to the region. As a result, the water levels in the aquifers have remained stable, and the District's water supply capacity will increase to 14.7 MGD on an annual average basis when Tacoma's Second Supply Project is completed in 2004. Concentrating growth, along with conservation measures, should help to conserve water. Water Quality Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City. Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water; and, continued health of the City's streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining 2003 Camp Plan Update 11-5 FWCP-ChapterTwa, Land Use EX(-H B II PAGE_-'1 ".:8 - ....",~ .1 . ),- LUP36 Develop business parks that fit into their surroundings by grouping similar industries in order to reduce or eliminate land use conflicts, allow sharing of public facilities and services, and improve traffic flow and safety. LUP37 Limit retail uses to those that serve the needs of people employed in the area. Commercial City Center Core The intent of establishing the City Center Core is to create a higher density, mixed-use designation where office, retail, government uses, and residential uses are concentrated. Other uses such as cultural/civic facilities, community services, and housing will be highly eneouraged. City Center Frame The City Center Frame designation will have a look and feel similar to the Core and will provide a zone of less dense, mixed-use development physically surrounding a portion of the City Center Core. Together, they are meant to complement each other to create a "downtown" area. A more detailed description, along with goals and policies regarding the City Center Core and Frame, can be found in the City Center chapter. Community Business The Community Business designation encompasses two major retail areas of the City. It covers the "strip" retail areas along SR-99 and the large "bulk" retail area found near the South 348th Street area, approximately between SR-99 and 1-5. Community Business allows a large range of uses and is the City's largest retail designation in tenus of area. The Community Business designation generally runs along both sides of SR-99 from South 272nd to South 348th. A wide range of development types, appearance, ages, function, and scale can be found along SR-99. Older, single-story developments provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment. Due in part to convenient access and available land, the South 348th Street area has become a preferred location for large bulk retailers such as Eagle Hardware, Home Depot, and Costco. Due to the size of these facilities, the challenge will be to develop these uses into well functioning, aesthetically pleasing retail environments. To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionally attractive, revised development standards, applied through Community Business zoning and Community Design Guidelines, address design quality, mixed-use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site design, modulation, and setback requirements are also addressed. Through regulations in the Community Business land use chart, the size and scale of hotels, motels, and office uses have been limited in scale so as not to compete with the City Center. 2003 Camp Plan Update 11-21 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use Goal LUG6 Policies LUP38 LUP39 EXHIB.lT_.- . PAGEJ :I- -: 1 Transform Community Business areas into vita!, attractive, mixed-use areas that appeal to pedestrians and motorists and enhance the community's image. Encourage transfonnation of Pacific Highway (SR-99) Community Business corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. Encourage auto-oriented large bulk retailers to locate in the South 348th Street Community Business area. Freeway Commercial The Freeway Commercial designation is intended for areas that border the I-5/South 320th and I-5/SR 18interchanges with convenient freeway access and visibility. Freeway Commercial areas are typically large in size (five acres or greater). The range of commercial land uses permitted in these areas is limited to uses that are difficult to site in the city's other commercially designated areas due to their large site size requirements and/or difficulty in adapting to pedestrian-oriented areas. Freeway Commercial areas are particularly suitable for automobile sales. home furnishings centers. and related retail and service uses that require large tracts of land. convenient freeway access and visibility. Goal LUG7 Policies LUP40 LUP41 LUP42 Encourage the development of limited areas with high levels of freeway access and visibility as suitable locations for freeway-oriented businesses to locate within the city in a cohesive development pattern that also meets the community's product and service needs. Encourage freeway oriented uses to locate in Freeway Commercial-designated areas. Encourage quality regional destination retail development through the utilization of appropriate design guidelines and development standards. The development of freeway commercial areas should respond to the needs of consumers by providing for ease of access and circulation and convenient grouping of complementary uses. 2003 Comp Plan Update 11-22 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use LUP43 EXHIBIT_- PAGE_'-__- 3 J'~1 Create additional development standards to mitigate impacts to neig~boring. residential uses. Neighborhood Business There are a dozen various sized nodes of Neighborhood Business located throughout the City. These nodes are areas that have historically provided retail and/or services to adjacent residential areas. The FWCP recognizes the importance of firmly fixed boundaries to prevent commercial intrusion into adjacent neighborhoods. Neighborhood Business areas are intended to provide convenient goods (e.g., groceries and hardware) and services (e.g., dry cleaners, dentist, bank) at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses. Developments combining residential and commercial uses provide a convenient living environment within these nodes. In the future, attention should be given to design features that enhance the appearance or function of these areas. Improvements may include sidewalks, open space and street trees, and parking either on street or oriented away from the street edge. The function of neighborhood business areas can also be enhanced by safe pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections to surrounding neighborhoods. The need to address expansion or intensification may occur in the future depending on population growth. Future neighborhood business locations should be carefully chosen . and sized to meet the needs of adjacent residential areas. Goal LUG7 Policies LUP40 LUP41 LUP42 LUP43 LUP44 LUP45 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Integrate retail developments into surrounding neighborhoods through attention to quality design and function. Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and services. Encourage neighborhood retail and personal services to locate at appropriate locations where local economic demand and design solutions demonstrate compatibility with the neighborhood. Retail and personal services should be encouraged to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. Neighborhood Business centers should consist of neighborhood scale retail and personal services. Encourage mixed residential and commercial development in Neighborhood 2003 Camp Plan Update 11-23 FWCP-ChapterTwo. Land Use PAGE- ., ~)Œ the PAS will not have to go through prolonged environmental review ~an be a powerful incentive for private development in the City Center. EXHJBJT___- _S.~. - Subarea Plans Over the years, citizens from various areas of the City have come forth to testify before the Planning Commission and City Council regarding their neighborhood or business area. Development of subarea plans can lead to area specific visions and policies. This type of specific planning, developed with citizen input and direction, can lead to improved confidence and ownership in the community. Areas where subarea planning should be considered include: SR-99 Corridor, South 348th Street area, and Twin Lakes neighborhood. Incentives Develop an incentives program, for both residential and commercial development. Incentives should be substantial enough to attract development and should be used to create affordable and desired types of housing and to encourage development within the City Center. Table II-3 Land Use Classifications Comprehensive Plan Classification Zoning Classification Single Family - Low Density Residential Suburban Estates (SE), one dwelling unit per five acres Single Family - Medium Density Residential RS 35,000 & 15,000 Single Family - High Density Residential RS 9600, 7200, 5000 Multiple Family Residential RM 3600, 2400, 1800 City Center Core City Center Core City Center Frame City Center Frame Office Park Office Park, Office Park 1,2, & 3 Professional Office Professional Office Community Business Community Business Business Park Business Park Freeway Commercial Freeway Commercial Neighborhood Business Neighborhood Business Corporate Park Corporate Park-l Commercial Recreation Office ParkA Open Space & Parks A variety of zoning is assigned. 2003 Camp Plan Update II-55 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development EXHIBrr PAGE__-I c '-- . -_I Retail Areas . SeaTac Mall and other regional retailers within the City redevelop/reposition to meet changing consumer demand and become more competitive with other regional retailers. . High-volume retail in Federal Way increases faster than population. . Growth in resident-serving retail occurs in the City Center, existing commercial nodes~ and in redevelopment areas along SR-99. . Neighborhood scale retail development keeps pace with population growth and to an increasing extent, is accommodated within mixed-use buildings in more concentrated neighborhood villages. . Pedestrian-oriented retail development emerges gradually in the redeveloped City Center. . Small amounts of retail use occur on the ground floor of offices, residential buildings, and parking structures. . Neighborhood scale retail development in concentrated neighborhood villages emerges in response to growth in multiple-family concentrations in the I-5/SR-99 corridor and new single-family development on the east side of 1-5. . Old, outdated strip centers along the SR-99 corridor redevelop as a mix of retail, office, and dense residential uses. . The large truck-stop facility at the intersection of Enchanted Parkway and South 34Sth Street is redeveloped into a retail or mixed-use commercial center. . Freeway oriented commercial development providing for automobile sales, home furnishings centers, hotels and related retail and service uses are located in areas . bordering the I-5/SR-IS and I-5/S 320th St interchanges within areas of appropriate size and with convenient access and visibility. Office Development . Offices of regional, national, and/or international firms locate in West Campus, East Campus, and the City Center. . Garden, high-rise, and mid-rise office space, and modern light-industrial buildings increase rapidly in areas with land assembled for business parks and in redeveloped retail areas. 2003 Comp Plan Updates IV-15 22-XXX New vehicle sales. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (FC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use, " THEN, across for REGULATIONS g Minimums ~ ~ Required Yards ,..¡ '" ;:¡ g " ",¡:t ¡.¡ '" ~ cr:: .: '" '" ,- 0"> '" '" ~~ USE Retail establishment providing for new vehicle sales including boats, motorcycles and recreational vehicle RV sales '" N êi3 Õ ....J ::0=- u '" ~ " "0 êi3 = 0 tt Process III acres Process I, II. III and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22-411, 22.431 - 22-460, respectively, ~ " ~ '- 0 ~ - '" -@,ü '¡) 2 :::ci5 35 ft, above average building elevation See notes 2 and 3 '" '" u '" 0- ",C/J '" OJ) 'Š .S ~~ ~¡:,., USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES Retail I, The hours of operation may be limited to reduce the impacts on nearby residential uses. facilities: 1 2. Ifany portion ofa structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft, from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure for every 300 shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of 50 ft, from the property line of the sq. ft of residential zone. gross floor 3. The height of that portion of a structure located 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft. above average building elevation to a area maximum of 55 ft., ifall of the following criteria are met: a, The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 fÌ. above average building elevation; and c. An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan, 4. Used vehicle sales, gasoline service stations, service, maintenance and body shops, car washes, auto supply stores, hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities, and coffee shops are only pennitted as an accessory use to a new vehicle sales establishment. 5, Gas pump islands, canopies, and covers over pump islands may not be closer than 25 fÌ, to any property line, unless located adjacent to a residential zone, in which case the setback shall be 50 fÌ. Outdoor vehicle display areas and service areas may not be closer than lOft. to any property line, unless located adjacent to a residential zone, in which case the setback shall be 50 fÌ. 6. Auto and boat body repair andlor painting may be pennitted under this section only if: a. Building layout and design mitigates impact of dust, fumes, noise, glare, odor, or any other discharge on neighboring uses and natural systems; protects neighboring uses and natural systems from accidental spillage, leakage, or discharge of hazardous material and pollutants; b. All storage, operations, service, painting, and repair are conducted within enclosed buildings. 7. Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way. 8. Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities must comply with state citing criteria adopted in accordance with Chapter 70. iõ(lcm 9, No use or activity shall be conducted that involves the release of toxic or noxious gases, fumes, or odors. ~ ~ 10, No use or activity shall be conducted that results in the contamination of stonnwater, surface water, or groundwater pursuant hap, Article IV, II.The site must be designed so that noise associated with public address systems; vehicle repair or maintenance; and truck parki . ad~ maneuvering; will not be audible off the subject property, based on a certificate to this effect, signed by an acoustical engineer an . I d '&Jhe development pennit application, I - 12. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be detennined by other site development requireme~ts, i.e" (eql,l.~d buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc, : " . '1 13. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX, Areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the parking lot design requirements of Section 22-1 634(b), -- 14, For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. Areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the parking lot landscaping requirements of Section 22-1567. " 15, Areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the provisions of Article XIII, Section 1113, Outdoor Activities and Stora1e~ 16. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. I j '-- 17. For noise standards that apply to the project, see Chapter la, Article II. V 18, Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property, .. L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22.1376 et seq. Otherwise: determined on a case-by- case basis For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. 22-XXX Retail. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (FC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS 2 Minimums ~ ~ Required Yards ... " ;:¡ g '" -0.1: ~ "~ ¡:¡: .::" ::> ,- ~> " " ~~ USE Reiill establishment selling household goods and furnishings, household appliances and home electronics (exctuding bulk and big box retail) Retail Outlet centers (excluding bulk and big box retail) " N Ci3 Õ .....¡ :ê' u co ~ " -0 Ci3 æ " ~ '- " 0 ~ - ::> -gj,ü ,- 2 " - :I:r/'J <= 0 ~ '" " u co 0.. -or/'J " OJ) ~ c: ':; .- 8'~ ~~ Process II I None 120 ft, 5 ft. 5 ft. 35 ft, above Retail facilities: See notes 2 3 and average I for every 300 Possible I I 10 ' building sq. ft of gross Process elevation floor area III See Note 3 See notes 2 and 3 Process I, II, III and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22.411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively, I for each 100 sq, ft, of gross floor area for restaurants USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES I, The hours of operation may be limited to reduce impacts on nearby residential uses. 2, Ifany portion ofa structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft, from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft, from the property line of the residential zone, 3, [fapproved through Process Ill, the height of that portion ofa structure located 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft, above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 ft" ifall of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft, for each one ft, the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and c, An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. 4. Assembly or manufacture of goods on the subject property is permitted only if: a, The assembly or manufacture is clearly accessory to an allowed use conducted on the subject property and is directly related to and dependent on this allowed use; and b, The assembled or manufactured goods are available for purchase and removal from the subject property and are for sale only to retail purchasers; and c. There are no outward appearance or impacts from the assembly or manufacture. 5, Restaurants, not exceeding 7,500 square feet in gross floor area, are allowed as an accessory use to the outlet center. ""M ~ 6, Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and ven~ si i a features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way. p 7. Outdoor use, activity, and storage is regulated by Articte XIII, Section II J 3, 1""'\ ..,.. 8, No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requiremeðt{ ie., M4Wred buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. m - 9. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX, I OJ, 10. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. - II. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII, ....." 12. Refer to § 22-946 et seq, to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. :..... i L- For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. "'.~ For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq, For details regarding required yards, see § 22.1131 et seq, : l' L ¡ 1'11- I-I 22-XXX Entertainment, etc. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (Fe) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. ,. THEN, across for REGULATIONS S2 Minimums ~ ~ Required Yards ,..¡ 0) ;;¡ g r" -.:>Q: "" 0) ~ ¡:c ,=: 0) '" .- a-> 0) 0) P:::P::: USE Retail establishment providing entertainment, recreational or cultural services or activities Golf driving range Process II INone Possible Process III See Note ~¿ Process I, II, III and IV are described in §§ 22.351 - 22.356, 22.36 t - 22.370, 22.386 - 22-4 t I, 22.431 - 22.460, respectively, 0) N <í3 Õ ,....¡ :;: u '" ~ 0) -.:> <í3 E 0 .t 20 ft,I5 ft, 15 ft, See notes 2, 3 and 6 æ 0) P::: '- 0) 0 - - ::I -fng ,¡ ;:: ::t:C/J '" 0) u '" 0. -.:>C/J 0) OJ) ,=: <= &~ 0) '" P:::~ USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES I, The hours of operation may be limited to reduce the impacts on nearby residential uses. 2. Ifany portion ofa structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft, from the property line of the residential zone, 3. If approved through Process III, the height of that portion ofa structure located 100 ft, or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft, above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 ft" if all of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b, That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft, for each one ft, the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and c. An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan, 4. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be detennined by other site development requirements, i.e., required butTers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 5, Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way, 6. Outdoor use, activity, and storage is regulated by Article XIII, Section 11 13. 7, For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX, 8. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII, 9. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII, 10. Refer to § 22-946 et seq, to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. II. Minor and supporting structures constructed as a functional requirement of golf driving ranges may exceed the applicable height limitation provided that the director of community development services detennines that such structures will' not significantly impact adjoining properties. 35 ft, above I Determined average on a case.by- building case basis elevation See notes 2, and 3 and 8 L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq, U III »X G)I 1T1õj For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22.1046 et seq, For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. --f J : ..... ; ~~ 22-XXX Hotel. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial(FC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS 2 Minimums S ~ Required Yards ;:J g '" ""¡:\:; ~ '"' ~ ~ ,:" ::3 ,- 0"> " " ¡:<:¡:<: USE Hotel " N Vi Õ .J ::: u "" ~ " "" Vi æ " ¡:<: .... " 0 ... - ::3 §ü ,- 2 " - :I:tI'J ë 0 ~ '" " g 0.. ""en " 01) ,:: c: ::3 ,- â1~ ¡:<:p.. USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES I, If any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft. from the property line of the residential zone, 2. If approved through Process III, the height of that portion of a structure located 100 ft, or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft. above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 ft., if all of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft, for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and c, An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d, The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan, 3. If this use includes accessory meeting, convention or other facilities that will be used by persons other than overnight guests at the hotel, the city may require additional parking on a case-by-case basis, based on the extent and nature of these accessory facilities. 4. Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way. 5, Outdoor use, activity, and storage is regulated by Article XIII, Section 1113, 6, No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e., required butTers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc, 7, For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX 8. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. 9. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. 10. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. Process II INane 120 ft. 5 ft, 5 ft, 35 ft. above lOne for each See notes I, 2 and average guest room. Possible I 18 building Process elevation III See Note 2 See notes 1 - 2 Process 1, n, III and IV are described in §§ 22.351 - 22-356, 22.361 - 22-370, 22.386-22.411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. See note 3 L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22.1376 et seq. For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq, For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. -om :I> X G) I miñ - ~ ...... 0 h. ~ 22-XXX Public utility. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (Fe) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this sectIon: j2 DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use, , , s: Minimums ~ ~ Required Yards ...¡ " ;:; g '-' ."",= ~ "~ ~ ,:" ::> ,- 0"> " " """" USE .., N (;3 Õ ...¡ ? u '" ~ " .", (;3 'i: 0 ù: æ .., "" '- " 0 .... :;::E 01):5 '0:; .:. ;r::(/) Possible Process III Public utility' Process II See note 2 Process I, II, III and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386-22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively, See notes I and 2 THEN, across for REGULATIONS USE ZONE CHART oj) <= :;;; æ ¡:>., .", .., .... '" ,- .., ::> U 0"", .., Q. ¡:>::(/) Determined on a case-by-case basis, ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES 1. If any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft. from the property line of the residential zone. 2. If approved through Process III, the height of that portion of a structure located 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft" ifall of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b, That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft, for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft, above average building elevation; and c, An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. 3, May be permitted only if locating this use in the immediate area of the subject property is necessary to permit effective service to the area to be served. 4, If detennined necessary to mitigate visual and noise impacts to surrounding properties, the city may require additional landscaping or buffers on a case-by-case basis. 5, No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e. required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 6, For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIx. 7. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. 8. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. 9. Refer to §22-946 et seq to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq, -um ÞX G)I m -~ . OJ I... F Of I" ..... I For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq, For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq, 22-XXX Public Transit Shelter The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway c()mmerciaIjFC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. , . S2 Minimums 1;;: ~ Required Yards ,..¡ <.> ;;¡ g '" .",¡:\: ~ ~ ~ .... .- <.> := .- C";> <.> <.> CC:CC: USE <.> N Vi Õ ...J :;: ~ ~ <.> .", Vi <: e "'" THEN, across for REGULATIONS USE ZONE CHART æ <.> ¡:,:: '- 0 <.> - ::; ..c:- olJU ,j 2 ::r:ci'5 Public transit I Process I Transit I None shelter Shelter: 15 ft, above average building elevation Process I, II, III and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. oD c: :.;.;: æ p.. .", ~ V> .- <.> := u c"'" <.> Co ¡:'::CI) ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES I, For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX. 2. There are no landscaping requirements for this use. The larger site on which it is located is subject to the landscaping requirements of Article XVII. 3. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIIl. 4, Refer to §22-946 et seq to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq, u rn þ. >< CJ) I m -- I (jJ \... ~ I U' ìT1 -- Ii 22-XXX Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (Fe) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this sectIon: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. , , :2 Minimums :::.. ~ Required Yards ...¡ <J ;:¡ g r...:J .",<=t: ¡.¡ <J ~ cz: ,: <J :> ,- <:TO> <J <J ¡:<:¡:<: See note 2 USE Personal wireless service facility See note 5 for allowed types of PWSFs <J ,~ [/) Õ ..J :ê' u n ~ <J .", [/j 1: 0 ~ None ¡See ¡See ¡See note I note note I 1 Process I, 11, 111 and IV are described in ** 22.351 - 22.356, 22.361 - 22-370, 22.386 - 22.411, 22.431 - 22-460, respectively, THEN, 3':ross for REGULA nONS USE ZONE CHART ;a <J ¡:<: 'õ ~ - :> ~ü ,- :> <J ;:, ;¡:[/) Refer to §22-967 for maximum heights for allowed types of PWSFs See note 3 <J Q. " u ~ '" " ..J See Not note allowed 4 on a PWSF VI '" C!) [/j I C!) '" :.;;: ;a "- .", ~ VI .- <J :> u <:Tn <J C ¡:<:t/) ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES N/ A II. For developed sites, the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the subject property. For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new freestanding PWSFs shall be 20 ft, for front, side, and rear yards, 2. Subject to meeting all applicable development standards, the review process used shall be Process I, except for the following proposals: a, Process III for the following proposals: (I) The PWSF is located within 300 ft. ofa residential zone; (2) The PWSF is located on a structure that is a residence or school or contains a residence or school; or (3) The PWSF is a new freestanding PWSF. b. Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodating four or more providers. 3, Maximum allowed height for a new freestanding PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to 100 ft" plus any height granted under § 22.1047, A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120 ft. if there are two or more providers, except that a lattice tower of between 120 ft. and 150 ft. will be allowed under a combined application of four or more providers. 4, All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII of this chapter, and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimum, a five ft. type III landscaping area shall be required around the facility, unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened. 5, New freestanding PWSFs are allowed subject to height limits and collocation provisions. PWSFs are allowed on existing towers, on private buildings and structures, on publicly used structures not located in public rights-of-way, on existing structures located in the BPA trail, and on existing structures in appropriate public rights-of-way. Refer to § 22-967 for development standards applicable to allowed types ofPWSFs, 6. For all other development standards, see Article XIII, Section 22-966 et al. For other information about parking and parking areas, see * 22-1376 et seq. -am »x G)J: miJj - ~~ I "1 0 iTl For details of what may exceed this height limit, see * 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see * 22-1131 et seq. ;4 ~ 10-26 General prohibition. . It is unlawful for any person to cause, or for any person in possession of property to allow to originate from the property, sound that is a public disturbance noise. (Ord. No. 90-37, § I(A), 2- 20-90) EXHIB'T_- K PAGE__~_,JEI 10-27 Illustrative enumeration. The following sounds are public disturbance noises in violation of this article: (1) The frequent, repetitive or continuous sounding of any horn or siren attached to a motor vehicle, except as a warning of danger or as specifically permitted or required by law. (2) The creation of frequent, repetitive or continuous sounds in connection with the starting, operation, repair, rebuilding or testing of any motor vehicle, motorcycle, off-highway vehicle or internal combustion engine within a residential district, so as to unreasonably disturb or interfere with the peace and comfort of owners or possessors of real property. (3) Yelling, shouting, whistling or singing on or near the public streets, particularly between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. or at any time and place as to unreasonably disturb or interfere with the peace and comfort of owners or possessors of real property. (4) The creation of frequent, repetitive or continuous sounds which emanate from any building, structure, apartment or condominium, which unreasonably disturbs or interferes with the peace and comfort of owners or possessors of real property, such as sounds from musical instruments, audio sound systems, band sessions or social gatherings. (5) Sound from motor vehicle audio sound systems, such as tape players, radios and compact disc players, operated at a volume so as to be audible greater than 50 feet from the vehicle itself. (6) Sound from portable audio equipment, such as tape players, radios, and compact disc playêrs, operated at a volume so as to be audible greater than 50 feet from the source, and if not operated upon the property of the operator. (7) The squealing, screeching or other such sounds from motor vehicle tires in contact with the ground or other roadway surface because of rapid acceleration, braking or excessive speed around corners or because of such other reason; provided, that sounds which result from actions which are necessary to avoid danger shall be exempt from this section. (8) Sounds originating from construction sites, including but not limited to sounds from construction equipment, power tools and hammering between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 8:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends. (9) Sounds originating from residential property relating to temporary projects for the maintenance or repair of horns, grounds and appurtenances, including but not limited to sounds from lawn mowers, powered hand tools, snow removal equipment and composters between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends. (Ord. No. 90-65, § 1(8), 7-3-90; Ord. No. 99-341, § 3, 5-4-99) <1')2002 Code Publishing Co- Page 1 EXHIBIT___L. P A.G E -1- <) F -2.. Federal Way City Code Chapter 22, Article XIII, "Supplementary District Regulations" 22-966 Personal wireless service facilities (PWSF). (a) Purpose. This section addresses the issues of location and appearance associated with personal wireless service facilities. It provides adequate siting opportunities through a wide range of locations and options which minimize safety hazards and visual impacts sometimes associated with wireless communications technology. The siting of facilities on existing buildings or structures, collocation of several providers' facilities on a single support structure, and visual mitigation measures are required, unless otherwise allowed by the city, to maintain neighborhood appearance and reduce visual clutter in the city. (b) Definitions. Any words, tenns or phrases used in this section which are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in FWCC 22-1. (c) Exemptions. The following antennas and facilities are exempt from the provisions of this section and shall be pennitted in all zones consistent with applicable development standards as outlined in the use zone charts, Article XI of this chapter, District Regulations: (1) Wireless communication facilities used by federal, state, or local public agencies for temporary emergency communications in the event of a disaster, emergency preparedness, and public health or safety purposes. (2) Industrial processing equipment and scientific or medical equipment using frequencies regulated by the FCC; provided such equipment complies with all applicable provisions of FWCC 22-960, Rooftop Appurtenances, and Chapter 22 FWCC, Article XIII, Division 5, Height. (3) Citizen band radio antennas or antennas operated by federally licensed amateur ("ham") radio operators; provided such antennas comply with all applicable provisions of FWCC 22-960, Rooftop Appurtenances, and Chapter 22 FWCC, Article XIII, Division 5, Height. (4) Satellite dish antennas less than two meters in diameter, including direct-to-home satellite services, when used as a secondary use of the property; provided such antennas comply with all applicable provisions of FWCC 22-960, Rooftop Appurtenances, and Chapter 22 FWCC, Article XIII, Division 5, Height. (5) Automated meter reading (AMR) facilities for the purpose of collecting utility meter data for use in the sale of utility services, except for whip or other antennas greater than two feet in length; provided the AMR facilities are within the scope of activities pennitted under a valid franchise agreement between the utility service provider and the city. (6) Routine maintenance or repair of a wireless communication facility and related equipment excluding structural work or changes in height, dimensions, or visual impacts of the antenna, tower, or buildings; provided, that compliance with the standards of this chapter are maintained. (d) Prioritized locations. The following sites shall be the required order of locations for proposed PWSFs, including antenna and equipment shelters. In proposing a PWSF in a particular location, the applicant shall analyze the feasibility of locating the proposed PWSF in each of the higher priority locations and document, to the city's satisfaction, why locating the PWSF in each higher priority location and/or zone is not being proposed. In order of preference, the prioritized locations for PWSFs are as follows: (I) Structures located in the BPA trail. A PWSF may be located on any existing support structure currently located in the easement upon which are located U.S. Department of Energy/ Bonneville Power Administration ("BPA") Power Lines regardless of underlying zoning. «)2002 Code Publishing Co. Page I EXHIBIT.L PAGE~':)F~ (2) Existing broadcast, relay and transmission towers. A PWSF may be located on an existing site or tower where a legal wireless telecommunication facility is currently located regardless of underlying zoning. If an existing site or tower is located within a one mile radius of a proposed PWSF location, the applicant shall document why collocation on the existing site or tower is not being proposed, regardless of whether the existing site or tower is loeated within the jurisdi-ction of the city. (3) Publicly used structures. If the city consents to such location, a PWSF may be located on existing public facilities within all zoning districts, such as water towers, utility structures, fire stations, bridges, and other public buildings, provided the public facilities are not located within public rights-of-way. (4) Appropriate business, commercial, and city center zoned sites. A PWSF may be located on private buildings or structures within appropriate business, commercial, and city center zoning districts. The preferred order of zoning districts for this category of sites is as follows: BP - Business Park FC - Freeway Commercial CP-l - Corporate Park OP through OP-4 - Office Park CC-C - City Center Core CC-F - City Center Frame BC - Community Business (5) Appropriate public rights-of-way. For the purposes of this section, appropriate public rights-of-way shall be defined as including those public rights-of-way with functional street classifications of principal arterial, minor arterial, and principal collector. A PWSF may be located on existing structures in appropriate public rights-of-way. Structures proposed for location of PWSFs shall be separated by at least 330 linear feet. Within any residential zone, neighborhood business (BN) zone, or professional office (PO) zone, there shall be no more than one PWSF located on an existing structure. Location of a PWSF on an existing structure in an appropriate public right-of-way shall require a right-of-way pennit in addition to the required use process approval. The preferred order of functional street classifications for this category of sites is as follows: Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Principal Collector If the PWSF is proposed to be located in an appropriate public right-of-way and the surrounding uses or zoning are not the same, that portion of the right-of-way with the most intensive use and/or zoning shall be the preferred location. If the PWSF is proposed to be located in an appropriate public right-of-way and surrounding uses or zoning are the same, the preferred location shall be that portion of the right-of-way with the least adverse visual impacts. (6) If the applicant demonstrates to the city's satisfaction that it is not technically possible to site in a prioritized location, the city reserves the right to approve alternative site locations if a denial would be in violation of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, as determined by the city. (Ord. No. 97-300, § 3, 9-16-97; Ord. No. 00-363, § 14, 1-4-00; Ord. No. 01-399, § 3, 8-7-01) (1)2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 2 EXHIß~~\ Federal Way City CodPAGE- Chapter 22, Article XVII, "Landscaping" M - - 2. t 22-1566 Landscaping requirements by zoning district. (a) Suburban Estates, SE. (1) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines of nonresidential uses in the SE zoning district, except as provided in FWCC 22-1567 of this article. (b) Single-Family Residential, RS. (l) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines of nonresidential uses in the RS zoning districts, except as provided in FWCC 22-1567 of this article. (c) Multifamily Residential, RM (1) Type III landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along all public rights-of-way and ingress/egress easements. (2) Type II landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along the common boundary abutting single-family zoning districts. (3) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (c)(l) and (c)(2) of this section. (d) Professional Office, Po. (l) Type III landscaping eight feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. (2) Type I landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter property lines abutting a residential zoning district except for schools which shall provide 10 feet of Type II. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (d)(l) and (d)(2) of this section. (e) Neighborhood Business, BN (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all properties abutting public rights-of-way and ingress/egress easements. (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width along all perimeter lot lines except as noted in subsections (e)(l) and (e)(2) of this section. (f) Community Business, BC (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all properties abutting public rights-of-way and ingress/egress easements. . (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lots lines except as noted in subsections (f)(l) and (f)(2) of this section. (g) Freewav Commercial, FC (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of parking areas abutting public rights-of-way. (2) Type I landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zone. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all p~rimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this section. ~2002 Code Publishing Co. Page I Eg1 (h} City Center, Cc. : ~ (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of parking areas abutting public rights-of-way. (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines except as noted in subsections (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this section. W ill Office Park, OP; and Corporate Park, CP-J. (1) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this subsection. (i) Uanufixturing Parle, MP. (i) Business Park. BP. (1) Type II landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. (2) Type I landscaping 25 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of the property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type II landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of the property abutting a nonresidential zoning district, except MP zones. (4) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines except as noted in subsections (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this section. (Ord. No. 93-170, § 4, 4-20-93; Ord. No. 96-270, § 3(E), 7-2-96) EXH\B\T PAGE.--- 2. - M (~ ----2. 02002 Code Publishing Co. Page 2 EXHIBIT Federal Way City CodePAGE,-_- I Chapter 22, Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines" N ----~ 22-1638 District guidelines. In addition to the foregoing development guidelines, the following supplemental guidelines apply to individual zoning districts: (a) Professional office (PO), neighborhood business (BN), and community business (BC), and freeway commercial (FC). (1) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of- way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right- of-way or pedestrian area. (4) If utilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl- coated mesh and powder-coated poles. For residential uses only: (5) Significant trees shall be retained within a 20-foot perimeter strip around site. (6) Landscaped yards shall be provided between building(s) and public street(s). Parking lots should be beside or behind buildings that front upon streets. (7) Parking lots should be broken up into rows containing no more than 10 adjacent stalls, separated by planting areas. (8) Pedestrian walkways (minimum six feet wide) shall be provided between the interior of the project and the public sidewalk. (9) Lighting fixtures should not exceed 20 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. This shall not apply to public parks and school stadiums. 20. Fi~u,,: 1(, . Si..-c.. 12. 1(,.\'1 {:iÎ (10) Principal entries to buildings shall be highlighted with plaza or garden areas containing planting, lighting, seating, trellises and other features. Such areas shall be located and designed so windows overlook them. «:>2002 Code Publishing Co. Page I EX~1!t:i7 PAGE a N --~ Ii:;,... 1"1.5,\\."22 . 6\~ (it.> (11) Common recreational spaces shall be located and arranged so that windows overlook them. '--......... ',,- =¥ ...--" ,.,....- Fit'"", I ¡.. - s.a'. 21- I(;~ (;1) (12) Units on the ground floor (when permitted) shall have private outdoor spaces adjacent to them so those exterior portions of the site are controlled by individual households. FI¿:\l1\: 19- s..,~. 22 - j(.~~ :~¡ (13) All new buildings, including accessory buildings, such as carports and garages shall appear to have a roof pitch ranging from at least 4: 12 to a maximum of 12: 12. «::>2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 2 EXH f ~j ~-~ PAGE 3 , -~ . ,J.- ri¡;~1f\: 10 - S<v. 2Z - :<:J~ í<1; (14) Carports and garages in front yards should be discouraged. (IS) The longest dimension of any building facade shall not exceed 120 feet. Buildings on the same site may be connected by covered pedestrian walkways. (16) Buildings should be designed to have a distinct "base", "middle" and "top" The base (typically the first floor) should contain the greatest number of architectural elements such as windows, materials, details, overhangs, cornice lines, and masonry belt courses. The midsection by comparison may be simple. (Note: single-story buildings have no middle.) The top should avoid the appearance of a flat roof and include distinctive roof shapes including but not limited to pitched, vaulted or terraced, etc. ripm:- 21 - "K-r, 12. 1638 (~) (17) Residential design features, including but not limited to entry porches, projecting window bays, balconies or decks, individual windows (rather than strip windows), offsets and cascading or stepped roof forms shall be incorporated into all buildings. Window openings shall have visible trim material or painted detailing that resembles trim. (b) Office park (OP), corporate park (CP), and business park (BP). (I) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). (2) Buildings with ground floor retail sales or services should orient major entrances, display windows and other pedestrian features to the right-of-way to the extent possible. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right- of-way or pedestrian area. (4) If utilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl- coated mesh and powder-coated poles. For non-single-family residential uses only: (5) Subsections (a)(5) through (A)(l7) of this section shall apply. (c) City center core (CC-C) and city center frame (CC-F). (I) The city center core and frame will contain transitional forms of development with surface parking areas. However, as new development or re-development occurs, the visual <92002 Code Publishing Co. Page 3 EXHIBIT -N dominance of surface parking areas shall be reduced. TheretPrA~~ par~ are~s' shall-d located as follows: a. The parking is located behind the building, with the building located between the right-of-way and the parking areas, or it is located in structured parking; or . b. All or some of the parking is located to the side(s) of the building; or c. Some short-term parking may be located between the building(s) and the right-of- way, but this shall not consist of more than one double-loaded drive aisle, and pedestrian circulation shall be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). Large retail complexes may not be able to locate parking according to the above guidelines. Therefore, retail complexes of 60,000 square feet of gross floor area or larger may locate surface parking between the building(s) and the right-of-way. However, this form of development shall provide for small building(s) along the right-of-way to break up and reduce the visual impact of the parking, and pedestrian circulation must be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). For purposes of this guideline, retail complex means the entire lot or parcel, or series of lots or parcels, on which a development, activity or use is located or will locate. (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of- way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. (3) Building facades that are visible from a right-of-way and subject to modulation per FWCC 22-1635(b), shall incorporate facade treatment as follows: a. The facade incorporates modulation and/or a landscape screening, pursuant to FWCC 22-1635(b); and b. The facade incorporates an arcade, canopy or plaza; and/or one or more articulation element listed in FWCC 22-1635(c)(2); provided, that the resulting building characteristics achieve visual interest and appeal at a pedestrian scale and proximity, contribute to a sense of public space, and reinforce the pedestrian experience. (4) Drive-through facilities and stacking lanes shall not be located along a facade of a building that faces a right-of-way. (5) Above-grade parking structures with a ground level facade visible from a right-of- way shall incorporate any combination of the following elements at the ground level: a. Retail, commercial, or office uses that occupy at least 50 percent of the building's lineal frontage along the right-of-way; or b. A I5-foot-wide strip of Type III landscaping along the base of the facade; or c. A decorative grille or screen that conceals interior parking areas from the right-of- way. (6) Facades of parking structures shall be articulated above the ground level pursuant to FWCC 22-I635(c)(I). . . (7) When curtain wall glass and steel systems are used to enclose a building, the glazing panels shall be transparent on 50 percent of the ground floor facade fronting a right-of-way or pedestrian area. (8) Chain-link fences shall not be allowed. Barbed or razor wire shall not be used. For non-single-family residential uses only: (9) Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(17) of this section shall apply. (d) For all residential zones. (1) Non-residential uses. Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(10) and (a)(13) through (a)(I7) of this section shall apply. (2) Non-single-family residential uses. Subsections (a)(5) through (a)( 17) of this section shall apply. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3,7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) <02002 Code Publishing Co. Page 4 ~ CITY OF ~ Federal Way CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM April 27, 2004 FROM: Jack Dovey, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Dav;d M+anag", Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner Janet Shull, AICP, Planning Consultant TO: VIA: SUBJECT: Amendments to Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) and Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, to add a Freeway Commercial Zoning Classification (File # 04-100812-00-UP) MEETING DATE: May 3,2004 I. INTRODUCTION In recent years the City of Federal Way has hired consultants to prepare two market studies, one for the entire City in 2000 and one for the City Center in 2002. In addition, the City hired a consultant to prepare a Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Sub-Area Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study, which is being presented to the LUTC concurrently with the proposed Freeway Commercial (FC) Zoning Classification. All of these studies found that there is adequate supply of vacant and underdeveloped commercial land in the City and in the P AA. However, these studies also point to the possibility of zoning for retail development not currently being captured in Federal Way as a way to increase the tax base within the City and the P AA. All of the studies identified automobile sales as a retail category that generates significantly more tax revenue than the cost of the public services they receive and also as a retail market that is not currently strong in Federal Way. Additional potential markets identified in the March 2002 study included Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment. The trend in these categories is to locate in destination-type regional retail centers. A. Proposed Freeway Commercial Zoning Designation The intent of the proposed Freeway Commercial Zoning designation is not to compete with the existing zones that already allow retail uses, but to capture the type of retail development that is presently locating outside of Federal Way. Any parcel five acres or more that is located bordering the I-5/SR-18 interchange or I-5/South 320th Street interchange, and is both visible and accessible from these interchanges, would be eligible to apply for the Freeway Commercial zoning designation. This zoning designation could be applied to parcels within the P AA as well as in the City. B. Concurrent Review of the Proposed Freeway Commercial Zoning Designation and the P AA Plan As part of the P AA Sub-Area Plan process, property owners within the P AA were given the opportunity to apply for a different pre-annexation and zoning designation. One applicant applied for Community Business (BC) zoning for approximately 23 acres located east of 1-5 and north of South 320th Street. The staff recommendation for this property was Freeway CommerciaL! Consequently, this new Freeway Commercial Zoning designation is being reviewed concurrently with the P AA Sub-Area Plan. II. BACKGROUND The proposed amendments were presented to the Planning Commission at their March 17, April 7, and April 21, 2004, public hearings. The staff reports to the Planning Commission and minutes of these meetings are attached as follows: Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Staff Report for the March 17,2004, Planning Commission Meeting (includes Tables I-III and Exhibits A-N) Minutes of March 17,2004, Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report for the April 7, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting (includes Exhibits A-C) Minutes of the April 7, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report for the April 21, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of the April 21, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting Exhibit 1 III. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY February 18, 2004 Issuance of Determination of Non significance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) March 3, 2004 End of SEP A Comment Period March 17, 2004 End of SEP A Appeal Period 1 The Planning Commission, in their April 21, 2004, deliberations of site-specific zoning change requests to the P AA Plan, did not vote in favor of application of the FC zone to this particular property Staff Report to the Land Useffransportation Committee Freeway Commercial Zone April 27,2004 File #04-100812-00-UP Page 2 March 17,2004 April 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing Planning Commission Public Hearing Continued April 21, 2004 May 3,2004 May 17,2004 July 6, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing Completed Presentation to LUTC LUTC Follow-up City Council Meeting IV. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The proposed amendments as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission are summarized as follows and shown in Exhibits 7-20: A. Proposed Changes to the Comprehensive Plan 1. Amend Chapter Two, Land Use to identify the Freeway Commercial concept and provide a general location in Figure II-2, the Concept Plan Diagram (Exhibit 7, Page lof7). 2. Amend Section 2.2 Relationship to Other Land Use Chapters to add a bullet that states: "Freeway commercial development focusing on attracting and capturing those retail dollars presently being lost to other communities and complementing existing retail uses in the community" (Exhibit 7, Page 2 of7). 3. Amend Section 2.8 Land Use Designations - Commercial Designations to add locational criteria, and goal and policy statements for the Freeway Commercial designation (Exhibit 7, Pages 5 and 6 of 7). 4. Amend Table II-3 Land Use Classifications to add the Freeway Commercial designation (Exhibit 7, Page 7 of7). 5. Amend Map II-I Comprehensive Plan Designations at the time areas are designated Freeway Commercial, subject to Federal Way City Council consideration. 6. Amend Chapter Four, Economic Development to incorporate freeway oriented commercial development in the Economic Development Vision for Federal Way (Exhibit 8). Staff Report to the Land Useffransportation Committee Freeway Commercial Zone April 27, 2004 File #O4-100812-00-UP Page 3 B. Proposed changes to FWCC, Chapter 22, Zoning Code 1. 2. 3. Permitted Uses The following uses are proposed to be allowed in the Freeway Commercial zone. Use Zone Charts have been prepared for each use: . Retail selling new vehicles;"'boats, recreational vehicles, and motorcycles (Exhibit 9) Retail selling household goods and furnishings (Exhibit 10) Retail selling household appliances (Exhibit 10) Retail selling home electronics (Exhibit 10) Retail outlet centers (Exhibit 10) Retail providing entertainment, recreational or cultural services, and activities (amusement parks, movie theaters) (Exhibit 11) Golf driving range (Exhibit 11) Hotel (Exhibit 12) Public utility (water supply, electric power, telephone, cablevision, natural gas, transportation for persons/freight, commercial broad-cast towers, commercial antennas) (Exhibit 13) Public transit shelter (bus stop) (Exhibit 14) Personal wireless service facilities (Exhibit 15) . . . . . . . . . . Accessory Uses Accessory uses are defined in FWCC Section 22-946, as a use, facility, or activity that is clearly secondary to the pennitted use. a) For vehicle and boat sales, accessory uses would include the following (Exhibit 9, note 4): . Used vehicle sales . Gasoline service stations . Service, maintenance, and body shops . Car washes . Auto supply stores . Coffee shop to serve customers and employees b) A restaurant with a maximum gross floor area of 7,500 square feet would be pennitted as accessory to a retail outlet center (Exhibit 10, note 5). Review Process The majority of the permitted uses in the Freeway Commercial zone are proposed to be reviewed under Process II, Site Plan Review, except for New Vehicle Sales, which would be reviewed under Process III. Process II review would be used for buildings up to 4,000 square feet gross floor area with up to 20 parking spaces or a parking lot up to 20 parking spaces. If these thresholds were exceeded, Process III would be used. Staff Report to the Land Userrransportation Committee Freeway Commercial Zone April 27, 2004 File #04-100812-00-UP Page 4 4. 5. Development Standards The following is a summary of the proposed development standards for the Freeway Commercial zone: a) Minimum lot size: Automobile sales uses must be located on at least five acres. Other permitted uses would have no minimum size requirements. b) Maximum lot coverage: Consistent with existing Federal Way use zone charts for non-residential uses, no maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, lot coverage is determined by other site development standards, such as landscaping, requirement for on-site detention, and parking. c) Height limits and setbacks when adjacent to residential zones: Maximum height of 35 feet unless the structure is located less than 100 feet from an adjacent residential zone. If a structure is located less than 100 feet from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 feet above average building elevation, and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 feet from the property line of the residential zone. In the case of new vehicle sales, the setback would be 50 feet versus 20 feet due to the potential intensity of the uses conducted. The height of that portion of a structure located 100 feet or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 feet above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 feet, if certain criteria are met: d) Noise, light and glare: Noise, light and glare can be associated with any non- residential use. The FWCC includes regulations that address all of these impacts. 1. Noise - Noise is addressed in Chapter 10, Article II (Exhibit 16). In addition, Note II was added in the Use Zone Chart for New Vehicle Sales (Exhibit 9). This note states that the site must be designed so that noise associated with public address systems; vehicle repair or maintenance; and truck parking, loading, or maneuvering; will not be audible off the subject property. n. Light and Glare - This is addressed in FWCC Sections 22-950 and 22-954. Existing code language was determined to be adequate to address these impacts, so no additional language was added. e) Hazardous waste, toxic or noxious gasses, water contamination: Automobile service, body shop, and maintenance facilities can generate odors or hazardous wastes, which can end up in surface or ground water. Consequently, notes to address these potential impacts are included in the Use Zone Chart for New Vehicle Sales (Exhibit 9, Notes 6,8,9 and 10). Amend FWCC Section 22-966 to include the FC zoning district in the list of zones where personal wireless facilities may be located (Exhibit 17). File #04-100812-00-UP Staff Report to the Land Useffransportation Committee Freeway Commercial Zone April 27, 2004 Page 5 6. Amend FWCC Section 22-1601, Signs in nonresidential zoning districts to add a new category - Highway Profile Category A signs - to apply to properties designated with FC zoning (Exhibit 18). This new sign category will allow one free-standing pylon or pole sign that is oriented towards 1-5, be located near the property line closest to 1-5, and be visible from 1-5, not the freeway ramps. This freestanding sign would be allowed in addition to the other typically-permitted signs in the City's commercial zoning districts. 7. Amend FWCC Section 22-1566, Landscaping requirements by zoning district to incorporate reference to the new FC zoning district (Exhibit 19). The following landscape standards are recommended: . Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of parking areas abutting public rights-of-way. Type I landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zone. Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted above. . . Language has been added to the Use Zone Chart for New Vehicle Sales (Exhibit 9) to clarify that areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the parking lot landscaping requirements of Section 22-1567 (Note 14). A note has also been added to state that areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the provisions of Article XIII, Section 22- 1113, Outdoor Activities and Storage, which also require screening and landscaping of outdoor storage (Note 15). 8. Amend FWCC Section 22-1638 District Guidelines (Community Design Guidelines) to incorporate reference to the new FC zoning district (Exhibit 20). v. LAND USErrRANSPORTATlON COMMITTEE OPTIONS The Committee has the following options: 1. - Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed comprehensive plan and code amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. - Recommend that the full Council modify and then approve the proposed comprehensive plan and code amendments. - Recommend that the full Council disapprove the proposed comprehensive plan and code amendments. - Recommend that the full Council refer the amendments back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. 2. 3. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends that the LUTC recommend to the full Council Option No. 1 above, that is, adoption of the Planning Commission's recommendations. Staff Report to the Land Useffransportation Committee Freeway Commercial Zone April 27, 2004 File #04-100812-00-UP Page 6 VI. COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWCC Article IX, "Process VI Review," any amendments to the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan designations map, or zoning text must be approved by the City Council based on a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Per FWCC Section 22-541, after consideration of the Planning Commission report, and at its discretion holding its own public hearing, the City Council shall by majority vote of its total membership take the following action: 1. 2. 3. 4. Approve the amendments by ordinance; Modify and approve the amendments by ordinance; Disapprove the amendments by resolution; or Refer the amendments back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. If this occurs, the City Council shall specify the time within which the Planning Commission shall report to the City Council on the amendments. APPROVAL OF COMMITrEE ACTION: Jack Dovey,Chair Eric Faison, Member Michael Park, Member LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Exhibit 10 Exhibit 11 Exhibit 12 Exhibit 13 Exhibit 14 Exhibit 15 Staff Report for the March 17, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting (includes Tables I-III and Exhibits A-N) Minutes of March 17,2004, Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report for the April 7, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting (includes Exhibits A-C) Minutes of the April 7, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report for the April 21, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of the April 21, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting Chapter Two, Land Use of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Chapter Four, Economic Development of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Use Zone Chart - New Vehicle Sales Use Zone Chart - Retail Use Zone Chart - Entertainment, Etc. Use Zone Chart - Hotel Use Zone Chart - Public Utility Use Zone Chart - Public Transit Center Use Zone Chart - Personal Wireless Service Facility Staff Report to the Land Useffransportation Committee Freeway Commercial Zone April 27, 2004 File #04-1 00812-00-UP Page 7 Exhibit 16 Exhibit 17 Exhibit 18 Exhibit 19 Exhibit 20 FWCC, Chapter 10, Article II, Sections 10-26 and 10-27 (Noise) FWCC, Chapter 22, Section 22-966, Personal Wireless Services Facilities Freeway Commercial Sign Language FWCC, Chapter 22, Article XVII, Landscaping FWCC, Chapter 22, Article XIX, Community Design Guidelines 1:\2004 Code Amendmen1s\Freeway Zone\LUTC\050304 Staff Report.doc/04/27/20042: 58 PM Staff Report to the Land Use!fransportation Committee Freeway Commercial Zone April 27, 2004 File #04-100812-00-UP Page 8 ~ CITY OF'" -~ Federal Way EXHIBIT' PAGE---LOF j-a STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Amendments to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapttr 22 Addition of Freeway Commercial Zone Planning Commission Meeting of March 17,2004 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Why a New Commercial Designation? In recent years, the City of Federal Way has hired consultants to prepare two market studies, one for the entire City in 2000 and one for the City Center in 2002. In addition, the City has hired a consultant to prepare a Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study, which were completed in 2003 but have not yet been adopted. All of these studies found there is adequate supply of vacant and underdeveloped commercial land in the City and in the P AA. Given that developable land is not a constraining factor in attracting development, the only way that land use actions would result in an incremental increase in development would be if the action created a specific opportunity for development that does not currently exist in the City or P AA. For instance, parcels that are highly visible from 1-5 may provide unique development opportunities. Sales tax revenues are the single largest source of tax revenue for most cities. In any given year, most Washington residents typically pay more in city sales tax than they do for any other city tax. This means that it is in every city's interest to capture as many retail dollars as possible. However, from a fiscal perspective, some retail uses are more attractive than others. The City of Federal Way is not a major destination for all types of retail; however, the City does dominate a large market area for many retail categories. Federal Way is particularly dominant in the general merchandise category (department stores), but the City also serves as a regional center for building material/hardware; eating and drinking establishments;food (grocery stores) and miscellaneous retail stores. The retail categories in which Federal Way is less competitive include auto sales,furniture, furnishings and equipment, and to a lesser extent, apparel and accessories. Each of these categories are dominated by destination-type regional retail centers, including cities like Tukwila for apparel and furniture, and cities like Renton or Puyallup for auto sales. These studies point to the possibility of zoning for retail development not currently being captured in Federal Way as a way to increase the tax base within the City and the PAA. The studies make it clear; however, that the key to generating increased tax base is to identify and capture retail markets that are currently underrepresented in Federal Way. EXHIBIT' PAGE a:)Esa All of the studies identify automobile sales as a retail category that generates significantly more tax revenue than the cost of the public services they receive, and also as a retail market that is not currently strong in Federal Way. Additional potential markets identified in the March 2002 study includedfurniture, furnishings, and equipment. The trend in these categories is to locate in destination-type regional retail centers. There is potential to capitalize on these findings by creating a new Freeway Commercial zoning designation that can be applied to properties that are located adjacent to, and visible from, 1-5 or SR-18, and are easily accessible from the freeway interchanges. The intent of the new Freeway Commercial Zoning designation is not to compete with the existing zones that already allow retail uses, but to capture new dollars that are presently leaking to neighboring jurisdictions. In addition, the Freeway Commercial zone is intended to allow uses that complement and support existing retail uses in other zones, such as outlet centers, as well as uses that attract people to Federal Way, such as entertainment facilities (movie theaters and amusement centers). 2. New Freeway Commercial Designation Any parcel five acres or more that is located adjacent to and visible from 1-5 or SR- 18, and is easily accessible from the freeway interchanges, is eligible to apply for the Freeway Commercial Zoning designation. This zoning designation can be applied to parcels within the PAA as well as in the City. As part of the PAA subarea planning process, parcels within the PAA have been given City comprehensive plan and zoning designations, which will become effective upon annexation to the City. For the most part, the proposed designations are very similar to the existing King County designations. In some cases, the proposed designations are intended to make zoning of adjacent parcels more consistent with each other. As part of the P AA Subarea Plan process, property owners within the P AA were given the opportunity to apply for a different pre-annexation and zoning designation. One applicant has applied for commercial zoning for approximately 23 acres located east of 1-5 and north of South 320th Street. This property may be a candidate for the new Freeway Commercial designation. Consequently, this new Freeway Commercial Zoning designation must be reviewed concurrently with the P AA Subarea Plan. 3. Existing Commercial Zoning The City of Federal Way currently has the following four commercial zoning designations (please refer to Table I for the allowable uses in each zoning district): . Neighborhood Business - BN Community Business- BC City Center-Core-- CC-C City Center-Frame- CC-F . . . Of the four existing zoning districts, the BC zone is the most automobile-oriented. The BN zone is intended to serve surrounding neighborhoods with pedestrian-oriented retail and services. The CC-C and CC-F zones, while allowing more intensive development and serving an area with greater automobile traffic, are also intended to provide a pedestrian-oriented environment. Planning Commission Staff Report Freeway Commercial Zone / File #04-1O0812-00-UP March 17,2004 Page 2 EXHIBIT__- -'-- PAGE-!'k: S~- The BC zone allows for a wide variety of commercial, office, and service uses. The existing BC- zoned areas are extensive, with many older developments that have potential for upgrading and re-development. While simply applying the BC zoning designation to additional large tracts of undeveloped land would allow for those retail uses identified by the market studies as under represented in Federal Way, it would potentially dilute private investment that otherwise might be concentrated in the older often under developed BC-zoned areas. In addition, this could create increased competition with the CC zoned areas. These circumstances led to the decision to consider a new zoning designation that would allow a focused range of commercial uses that require large tracts of land and a freeway-oriented location. For example, automobile dealerships and home furnishings centers are uses that typically require large tracts of land. Therefore, locating automobile dealerships and home furnishings centers in the existing BC zone would likely require the assemblage of multiple smaller parcels that for the most part are not located within easy access to the freeway. II. RESEARCH OF OTHER CITIES' CODES Staff researched codes of other jurisdictions that have freeway-oriented commercial zoning districts. Specifically, pennitted uses and development standards were reviewed for potential applicability to Federal Way's proposed Freeway Commercial Zoning designation. Tables II and III summarize those cities reviewed in Washington and California, respectively. Characteristics that were considered in selecting allowable uses and development standards for the Freeway Commercial zone were: . Freeway orientation/proximity to freeway/major highway Uses that are freeway-oriented (need visibility and/or convenient access) Retail categories in which Federal Way is less competitive Uses that need large tracts of land and have outdoor display of product (i.e. are not compatible with pedestrian-oriented or higher intensity commercial use districts) . . . III. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS 1. Permitted Uses The following uses are proposed to be allowed in a Freeway Commercial zone: . Retail selling new vehicles, boats, recreational vehicles, and motorcycles Retail selling household goods and furnishings (floor coverings, draperies, glass, and chinaware) Retail selling household appliances Retail selling home electronics Retail outlet centers Retail providing entertainment, recreational, or cultural services and activities (amusement parks, movie theaters) . . . . . Planning Commission Staff Report Freeway Commercial Zone I File #04-100812-00-UP March 17,2004 Page 3 EXHIBIT PAGE-&I I ,)~J' . Golf driving range Hotel Public utility (water supply, electric power, telephone, cablevision, natural gas, transportation for persons/freight, commercial broad-cast towers, commercial antennas) Public transit shelter (bus stop) Personal wireless service facilities . . . . 2. Accessory Permitted Uses Accessory uses are defined in Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-946, as a use, facility, or activity that is clearly secondary to the permitted use. (a) For vehicle and boat sales, accessory uses would include the following: . Used vehicle sales . Gasoline service stations . Service, maintenance, and body shops . Car washes . Auto supply stores . Coffee shop to serve customers and employees (b) A restaurant with a maximum gross floor area of7,500 square feet would be permitted as accessory to a retail outlet center. 3. Review Process Any new commercial development in Federal Way is subject to one of six land use processes (Process I-VI). The majority of the permitted uses in the Freeway Commercial zone are proposed to be reviewed under Process II, Site Plan Review. Except for new vehicle sales, which would be reviewed under Process III, Process II review would be used for building; up to 4,000 square feet gross floor area with up to 20 parking spaces or a parking lot up to 20 parking spaces. If these thresholds were exceeded, Process III would be used. Process II is an administrative review with no public notification. Process III requires a public notice of application to be published in the paper, posted on the City's official notice boards, and posted on the site. In addition, if the project is located within 300 feet of a residential zone, a copy of the notice would be mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the boundary of the property. This means that any new vehicle sales or other permitted use in the Freeway Commercial zone, which is 4,000 square feet or more with 20 or more parking spaces, or a parking lot with 20 or more spaces, would be reviewed' under Process III. 4. Development Standards The following issues were considered when drafting the Freeway Commercial development standards. Use zone charts have been prepared for all of the proposed permitted uses (Exhibits A-G)): I A change was made in FWCC Section 22-966 to add Freeway Commercial to the prioritized list of zoning districts (Exhibit H). Planning Commission Staff Report Freeway Commercial Zone / File #04-1 00812-00-UP March 17, 2004 Page 4 EXHIBIT--1 PAGE-S,)~- -'.& (a) Minimum Site Size - A survey of other communities found that minimum lot sizes for a permitted use ranged in size from none to five acres. The Freeway Commercial zone is intended to apply to an area that is large enough to accommodate a mix of USes that would attract a large customer base. The minimum size of five acres was chosen because this would accommodate one auto dealership, or a number of smaller retail uses. Language has been added to Page II-22 of Chapter Two, "Land Use," of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) to implement this goal (Exhibit I). At the time that an application for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezone to the Freeway Commercial zone is being considered, the parcel would have to meet both the minimum area size and locational requirements found in that section of the FWCP. (b) Maximum Lot Coverage - The range in maximum lot coverage allowed was broad in the other Washington communities reviewed, ranging from 85 percent in Olympia to no maximum requirements in Marysville and Oak Harbor. Consistent with existing Federal Way use zone charts for non-residential uses, no maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, lot coverage is determined by other site development standards, such as landscaping, requirement for on-site detention, and parking. (c) Height Limits and Setbacks When Adjacent to Residential Zones - Height limits for other jurisdictions' zoning districts that are similar to the proposed Freeway Commercial zone range from 30 to 50 feet, with most jurisdictions having a maximum of 35 feet. Issaquah allows an increase to 65 feet if certain criteria are met. When crafting the height limits for the Freeway Commercial zone, we relied on those standards in the Federal Way Community Business zone, since it was the most similar to the Freeway Commercial zone. A larger setback is required if the site is adjacent to a residential zone. The following summarizes how height and setbacks will be addressed (notes 1 and 2 of the use zone charts [Exhibits A-E): Maximum height of 35 feet unless the structure is located less than 100 feet from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 feet above average building elevation, and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 feet from the property line of the residential zone. In the case of new vehicle sales, the setback would be 50 feet versus 20 feet due to the potential intensity of the uses conducted. The height of that portion of a structure located 100 feet or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 feet above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 feet, if all of the following criteria are met: (i) The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and (ii) That portion of the structure is set back an additional one-foot for each one- foot the structure exceeds 35 feet above average building elevation; and (iii) An increase in height above 35 feet will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and Planning Commission Staff Report Freeway Commercial Zone / File #04-1 00812-00-UP March 17,2004 Page 5 EXHIBIT / P AGEj-GF "2. (iv) The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. (d) Noise, Light. and Glare - Noise, light, and glare can be associated with any non-residential use. The FWCC includes regulations that address all of these impacts. (i) Noise - Noise is addressed in Chapter 10, Article II. This section states that it is unlawful for any person to cause, or for any person in possession of property to allow to originate from the property, sound that is a public disturbance noise. A list of those noises considered public disturbances are attached as Exhibit J. This language is adequate to address noise associated with the majority of the allowable uses in the Freeway Commercial zone; however, public address speakers are frequently used in car dealerships to communicate with employees moving throughout large outdoor areas. In order to address this impact, note 10 was added in the use zone chart for new vehicle sales. This note states that public address speakers (PA systems) shall not be audible from an adjacent residential zone (Exhibit A). (ii) Light and Glare - This is addressed in FWCC Sections 22-950 and 22-954. 22-950 Glare regulation. Any artificial surface which produces glare which annoys; injures; endangers the comfort, repose, health, or safety of persons; or in any way renders persons insecure in life or in the use of property is a violation of this chapter. 22-954 Lighting regulation. (a) Efficient light sources. The applicant shall utilize energy efficient-light sources. (b) State code. The applicant shall comply with the state energy code with respect to the selection and regulation of light sources. (c) Glare from subject property prohibited. The applicant shall select, place, and direct light sources both directable and nondirectable so that glare produced by any light source, to the maximum extent possible, does not extend to adjacent properties or to the right-of-way. Automobile sales lots are brightly lit to showcase the merchandise. However, existing code language was detennined to be adequate to address these impacts, so no additional language was added. (e) Signage - All of the Washington jurisdictions surveyed had provisions for both freestanding and wall mounted signs. However, the regulations that are proposed to be adopted for the signs allowed in the Freeway Commercial zone (Exhibit K) were patterned after the City of Bellingham, because they seemed most appropriate for Federal Way. For the Freeway Commercial zone, FWCC Chapter 22, Article XVIII, "Signs," will be amended to provide a Highway Profile Sign Category A. This will allow one free-standing pylon or pole sign that is oriented towards the freeway, located near the property line closest to the freeway (not the off-ramps), and visible from the freeway. The allowable height shall not exceed 25 feet above the elevation of the nearest driving lane of the Planning Commission Staff Report Freeway Commercial Zone / File #04-1 008 1 2-00-UP March 17,2004 Page 6 EXHIBIT I P AGE --'-'l. C --5 2.- freeway at a point nearest to the proposed location of the sign. If the subject property has an elevation that is higher than the nearest driving lane of the freeway, then the sign shall be no taller than 20 feet above the average finished ground elevation measured at the midpoint of the sign base. If the elevation of the site is equal to or lower than the elevation of the freeway at a point nearest to the proposed location of the sign, the allowable sign area shall be 600 feet, with no one sign face exceeding 300 feet. If the subject property has an elevation that is higher than the nearest driving lane of the freeway, then the sign area shall not exceed 400 square feet, for the total sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 200 square feetThe Highway Profile Sign would be in addition to the already allotted freestanding signs. (f) Hazardous Waste, Toxic or Noxious Gasses, Water Contamination -Automobile service, body shop, and maintenance facilities can generate odors or hazardous wastes, which can end up in surface or groundwater. Consequently, the following notes have been added to the use zone chart for new vehicle sales (Exhibit A, Notes 5, 7, 8 and 9): (i) Auto and boat body repair and/or painting may be permitted under this section only if: a. Building layout and design mitigates impact of dust, fumes, noise, glare, odor, or any other discharge on neighboring uses and natural systems; protects neighboring uses and natural systems from accidental spillage, leakage, or discharge of hazardous material and pollutants; b. All storage, operations, service, painting, and repair are conducted within enclosed buildings. (ii) Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities must comply with state citing criteria adopted in accordance with Chapter 70. I 05 RCW. (iii) No use or activity shall be conducted that involves the release of toxic or noxious gases, fumes, or odors. (iv) No use or activity shall be conducted that results in the contamination of stonnwater, surface water, or groundwater pursuant to Chapter 21, Article IV. (g) Landscape Screening - Requirements for landscaping screening should ensure that commercial uses are adequately screened from adjacent residential areas. In addition, landscaping along street frontages should reflect the desire of the business owner to display merchandise for sale. In order to accomplish these objectives, the following landscape standards are recommended (Exhibit L): . Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of parking areas abutting public rights-of-way. Type I landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zone. Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted above. . . Planning Commission Staff Report Freeway Commercial Zone I File #04-1 00812-00-UP March 17,2004 Page 7 EXHIBIT I PAGEJ ')iC5_~ New vehicle sales include a display area for cars. Language has been added to the use zone chart for new vehicle sales (Exhibit A) to clarify that areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the parking lot landscaping requirements of FWCC Section 22-1567 (note 13). A note has also been added to state that areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the provisions of FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIII, Section 22-1113, "Outdoor Activities and Storage," which also require screening and landscaping of outdoor storage (note 14). 5. Community Design Guidelines Amendments to the "Community Design Guidelines," FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIX, Section 22-1638, would add the Freeway Commercial District to that section, which governs Professional Office (PO), Neighborhood Business (BN), and Community Business (Be) (Exhibit M). IV. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS The following paragraphs present recommended Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) amendments necessary to implement a new commercial land use and zoning designation for Freeway Commercial development. 1. The Concept Plan Diagram On page 11-3, Figure 11-2, Concept Plan Diagram, should be revised to identify the Freeway Commercial concept and general location (this will be done prior to adoption). 2. Section 2.2, Relationship to Other Land Use Chapters On Page II-4, a bullet should be added that states the following, "Freeway commercial development focusing on attracting and capturing those retail dollars presently being lost to other communities and complementing existing retail uses in the community" (Exhibit I). 3. Section 2.8, Land Use Designations - Commercial Designations Following the description of the Community Business Designation, add the following section for the proposed Freeway Commercial designation (Exhibit I): Freeway Commercial The Freeway Commercial designation is intended for areas that are adjacent to Interstate 5 and SR 18 interchanges with convenient freeway access and visibility. Freeway Commercial areas are typically large in size (five acres or greater). The range of commercial land usespermitted in these areas is limited to uses that are difficult to site in the city's other commercially designated areas due to their large site size requirements and/or difficulty in adapting to pedestrian-oriented areas. Freeway Commercial areas are particularly suitable for automobile sales, home furnishings centers and related retail and service uses that require large tracts of land, convenient freeway access and visibility. Planning Commission Staff Report Freeway Commercial Zone I File #04-100812-00-UP March 17,2004 Page 8 EXHIBIT__' P AGE -!- !~) t='.!1. Goal LUG7 Encourage the development of limited areas with high levels of freeway access and visibility as suitable locations for freeway-oriented businesses to locate within the city in a cohesive development pattern that also meets the community's product and service needs. . Policies LUP40 Encourage freeway oriented uses to locate in Freeway Commercial-designated areas. LUP41 Encourage quality regional destination retail development through the utilization of appropriate design guidelines and development standards. LUP42 The development of freeway commercial areas should respond to the needs of consumers by providing for ease of access and circulation and convenient grouping of complementary uses. LUP43 Create additional development standards to mitigate impacts to neighboring residential uses. 4. Table 11-3, Land Use Classifications (Exhibit I) Add a row to this table with the following infonnation: Comprehensive Plan Designation: Zoning Classification: Freeway Commercial Freeway Commercial 5. Map II-I, Comprehensive Plan Designations (Exhibit I) At such time that areas are designated Freeway Commercial, subject to Federal Way City Council consideration, Map II-I and the official comprehensive plan map will be amended to incorporate the Freeway Commercial designated areas. 6. Section 4.2, The Economic Development Vision for Federal Way (Exhibit N) On page IV -15 under the heading "Retail Areas," add a bullet as follows: . Freeway oriented commercial development providingfor automobile sales, home furnishings centers, hotels, and related retail and service uses are located adjacent to [-5 and SR-18 within areas of appropriate size and with convenient access and visibility. Planning Commission StatfReport Freeway Commercial Zone / File #04-100812-00-UP March 17, 2004 Page 9 EXHIBIT I PAGEJ.CLOF~ . V. STAFF RECOMMENDA nON Staff recommends that a new Freeway Commercial zone be adopted with the amendments as proposed in the enclosed Exhibits A-H and J-M. VI. REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION FWCC Chapter 22 "Zoning," Article IX, "Process VI Review," establishes a process and criteria for zoning code text amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission is as follows: I. To review and evaluate the zoning code text regarding any proposed amendments. 2. To detennine whether the proposed zoning code text amendment meets the criteria provided by FWCC Section 22-528. 3. To forward a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption of the proposed zoning code text amendment. VII. DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWCC Section 22-528 provides criteria for zoning text amendments. The following section analyzes the compliance of the proposed zoning text amendments with the criteria provided by FWCC Section 22-528. The City may amend the text of the FWCC only if it finds that: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan. The proposed FWCC text amendment is consistent with the following FWCP goals and policies: LUPIO Support a diverse community comprised of neighborhoods that provide a range of housing options; a vibrant City Center; well designed and functioning commercial areas and distinctive neighborhood retail areas. LUP 15 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses. EDGI The City will emphasize redevelopment that transfonns the City from a suburban bedroom community to a full-service community with an urban core. EDG5 The City will encourage and support the development of recreational and cultural facilities and/or events that will bring additional visitors to Federal Way and/or increase visitor spending. EDP7 The City will develop zoning, pennitting and potential financial incentives that encourage prioritized development consistent with comprehensive and subarea plans and orderly, phased growth. Planning Commission StatfReport Freeway Commercial Zone / File #04- 1 008 12-00-UP March 17,2004 Page 10 EXHIBIT-.I P AGE -IL '~) F ---5-L- 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare because it has the potential to attract new sales tax revenues to the City of Federal Way. New tax revenues would offset the cost of providing City services. The intent of the Freeway Commercial zone is to capture new dollars that are presently leaking to neighboring jurisdictions. In addition, the Freeway Commercial zone is intended to allow uses, such as outlet centers, that complement and support existing retail uses in other zones, and entertainment facilities such as movie theaters and amusement centers, which would attract people to Federal Way. Increased setbacks, height limitations, and additional landscape screening are proposed for development within the Freeway Commercial zone that is located adjacent to residential areas. 3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest <Í the residents of the City. The proposed text amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City because it provides for a commercial designation that will pennit retail uses that are currently under represented in the City of Federal Way. These uses include vehicle sales, outlet centers, hotels, and home furnishing retail centers. By providing an opportunity for specialized retail centers to locate in areas with convenient freeway access and visibility, the City can attract more of these uses and resultant sales tax dollars. Currently, residents have to travel outside of Federal Way to find large concentrations of businesses offering these goods for sale. Providing a new zoning category that could be applied to land with convenient freeway access and visibility, and which allows uses currently under represented in the community, would keep more retail dollars at home and could attract more visitors to Federal Way and visitor spending within the community. VIII. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Consistent with the provisions of FWCC Section 22-539, the Planning Commission may take the following actions regarding the proposed zoning code text amendments: I. Recommend to City Council adoption of the FWCC text amendments as proposed; 2. Modify the proposed FWCC text amendments and recommend to City Council adoption of the FWCC text amendments as modified; 3. Recommend to City Council that the proposed FWCC text amendments not be adopted; or 4. Forward the proposed FWCC text amendments to City Council without a recommendation. IX. TABLES Table I Table II Table III Comparison of Allowable Uses City in Federal Way Commercial Zones Comparison of Development Standards in Selected Washington Cities Comparison of Development Standards in Selected California Cities Planning Commission Staff Report Freeway Commercial Zone / File #04-100812-00-UP March 17, 2004 Page II X. EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N EXHIBIT I PA,GE_jJ.GF 5~ Use Zone Chart - New Vehicle Sales Use Zone Chart - Retail Use Zone Chart - Entertainment, Etc. Use Zone Chart - Hotel Use Zone Chart - Public Utility Use Zone Chart - Public Transit Center Use Zone Chart - Personal Wireless Service Facility FWCC, Chapter 22, Section 22-966, Personal Wireless Services Facilities Chapter Two, Land Use of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan FWCC, Chapter 10, Article II, Sections 10-26 and 10-27 (Noise) Freeway Commercial Sign Language FWCC, Chapter 22, Article XVII, Landscaping FWCC, Chapter 22, Article XIX, Community Design Guidelines Chapter Four, Economic Development of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan 1:\DOCUMEN1\Freeway Commercial Zoning District\Planning Commission\Final 031704 Planning Commission StaffReport.DOC March 17, 2004 Page 12 Planning Commission Staff Report Freeway Commercial Zone I File #04-1 00812-00-UP TABLE I Government facility Group home Health club ....~~~.~.~:r....CC-FI X I x:I......:."..'" ...:],......,.. i ! Art gallery I i B-~~ki~'~¡~~~'&"'ï~~~...~~~;~;.=.~etail provid;~g the~~"..&.related finan~¡~Ï..~~-~i~~". ".-.'T"".'x'-¡ X Brokerage I I X I X Bulk sale of lumber, paint, glass; plumbing, electrical and heating fixtures & supplies; bulk I .. h 0 us e~..I1..~!9....g9.?.9.~Lf~!:11..i~~.i.11..g~.1,..~!1.9._I1.~E~~EY~.~9.~~-Q11..~I.~.9.~~..~.~þ}.gÞ9.?'.~:.I_~~,!!L.... .....-...-......-...-----....--...--.. ..-,..........-..-..-......... Business or vocational school X X --.--....,...........-..,.....,..,..........,.........,.,...-..,...................,.. ..-...... ..,........... .,.......,...,..."'.'.., ........,......,......,...... ....,..,....... Car wash X X .,.............,....-.....,.--...., Church, synagogue, or other place of religious worship I X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X (II-A and (II-A and X X t U~E c::==:=-=::=== Above-grade structured parking facilities ..,...-...----.--.-........,.-....,....,.........-...............-...-....,........,.........,..........,..................,.,.....,.........,"'.'...'.'.'.........'. Adult entertainment activity, retail or use BN1 BC X ..J...~~~~..~] 1-,=1 i i ,.---"] ::::¡::::::::: :::::::::::".~::~:¡ . I ......................................... .................-.......-.-.... ............................ ....-............-..- Day care facility, except Class II home occupations ...--.......-..-...........,.,..-...........,..,............................................... Department store X X -~ --=J I .~....~ m ..J:>. X ......Q :J:. m- ...x...tI .. ...,.... . ~ ...-"="-G :-I ........................._..~........ Convalescent center/nursing home .-,.,.--..........-................... ............ ...-...,.....,.......... Convention center/trade center Dwelling unit (Multiple family attached) .-....................-..-.....................-......... ............................... Dwelling unit (Multiple family stacked) X ......,......................................... X Fast food restaurant Golf course ----. Golf driving range ......... ......... ....,.... "".,.., ..............,......-..,..,..,..... ..,...., X X (II-A and ....-..,. ......... ,.,....-..., .................. .. .......... .........,........ I Excluding Bulk Retail - 1 - USES Hospital .........................,. ""'r"" cc-c1 CC-F1 X X X X X X BN1 BC Hotel Merchandise and equipment rental facilities (excluding heavy equipment rental) Mini-warehouse or public storage facility Motel use (medical, dental, health care, veterinary, accounting, legal, architectural, engineering, consulting, management, administrative, secretarial, marketing, advertising, personnel, sales offices n ~e}r~¿å! ¿6~~ ~fc¡~I~vOë h1 M~~fa X[W li~i ~~~h ~nr~]'¿ ¿~~iàl~ÎricThâf ;f}iJ¿'k~t6%~ ~¿ G:õi1~x~í 6~~r:~ §t_.. ..,-.............. ...-.., I ,~~~I1...~ferJ~c.i.Ut¡e.~..................._._...,..,........,.............".......!....."...,.. Personal wireless service facility --"."--'-."""'.".'-"-"-""""'."""""'.'"...., ....,...... .......,....,.... ,...,.........-.... .......-....... ................-..., Pistol range (Indoor) Private lodge or club ......... ......... .............. ....-...-........ Public park .--....,...--..............- Public transit shelter (bus stop) -.-..-.....-...,..,-...-...............,........-.............,...........-........ Public utility (water supply, electric power, telephone, cablevision, natural gas, transportation for ,~ .. .. . . broad-cast towers. commercial Recreational vehicle parking lot (temporary) Restaurant or tavern Retail selling groceries; produce and related items -.-.......-,.,..,................................,......."""'.., """.""""'.""""""""""""-""" """""" Retail selling drugs and personal care products Retail selling books -.,-......-......,-....,.............,..-.... Retail selling liquor X .....,.,........¡-........,...."..,.. J.... X """I"."""""'~ I-.. X X X X X X X I j" i "I.. X X X X X X X X X X ......................,.,........ X X ..................................,...... X X X X X X X .J.. i I "r I ....,j... ...... ......... J.. i i i .........,.-.¡............................... X ¡ X ...... ""'j"'- X ! X ....................,.j...... .............. xix .._,..j, ~..._.¡.._... X X I X Retail selling hardware X X X X Retail selling garden, nursery stock and related items X X X X Retail selling household goods and furnishing X X Retail selling household appliances Retail sale of grain, seed, fencing, hay, nursery stock and other agricultural supplies X - 2- X X X X X X X X ......... X X X FC X ........ I .í i i i ! '..-j I I .,....-.-.-..; I ...J I ....j ........, l' """"""""""""'.,.. .......................-....... "...._.1 X 1 X ..................---..-.. X ..........................,..- - ....--...-.-,-...----.-..,-....-.- USES ...--..."..."-"..,.."""..,,..............---..-.,,-.,.........,-.....-......-.- Retail selling clothing ,,--....................................,...-......-.--.....,.....--.....-...................--.,-, Retail selling variety items ...-.....-...-......................,-...-.....-,.,..-........-..........-.",..---" Retail selling specialty items ""-.".,,..-......................................,-......,--""..-.,.,...--....,..............................--,...", Retail selling home electronics ." .",-.,.,.--".""...,-.-."",.......,........... .....--..... ...............,.....,.-".-...""-........-..........-.........."..,....",."",.".".. Retail selling sporting goods "....---.....--".."".,.".,.".,..,......-".",.""""..,.",...-....,.............-.-.......-.,..""....",.,..,.,.,.-.,.",..,.......-....--.- Retail selling works of art .-.--.-...-.................-...,.,......"..".,.."....""......_..........................__..,--,- Retail outlet centers ..- ......---....""-,..",..-"....".,."".,...,,..,.........-..-.......--...-,-.....",.,.,.".,.".--..,.". Retail providing laundry, dry cleaning, beauty/barber, video rental or ! -......."-........-,,--..--.-..-...-...........,--,, Retail providing entertainment, recreational, or cultural services and a ...-......,.........,.,..--.........-.,.........-............"...,."-.",-.--"..,."",,...,...,.............-..................................- Retail providing printing & duplicating services .,_.""."-".......,,._,-,,-_............._......................,.........,.".._,.......,...... ,..,.."..."..,..".,.... ..............- Retail providing vehicle service or repair ...-...-...........--.....-.............,...-.,..,......"'.,........."",...,.._...."..,....",,_..,.............._..............._......- Retail providing vehicle, boat or tire sales, service, repair and/or paint .......-..---............-.............-..-...----,.-.,. .,-",--".",_.,...."._-- Retail selling new vehicles. boats. recreational vehicles and motorcycL ~l proviëlìñgTlmífëã medlcal:ITïãñ"üfiiëfiïi1ñg serŸìces süëh""ãS-dënta . ....J.~ryj£.~.~LQ..I:Ul.s.~~~-þ'y...ç.~~(;:_.þ.~~.!~_.....,...."........... ._"""""_."."""",_......""",,. ....".,.....,.,......,........... .....,..-- ....,..-.. School (through secondary education) "--.".--"",."""",."..",..".."".,..-,,,....-....-........-....-,.................-.......,,-.- Senior citizen or special needs housing ...- ..."...-..-.......-...-.....-............"-......-.-..-.--..,.,, """...",._,. ---,-,- Social service transitional housing ---,-"...".,..",."",-"",_.,.,.,,_._......,............ .".-. .-..."..."....-...,...........--..--.....--.,....-......,......,......,.".,. ",...."..., Trade school -..-"".."...--...". .,...,......."".,.,.......,.."....,....-....-.....-...-...-,........"....."...,.....""......."" V ehicle service station ."...,.-.,.....-..-............,..................--...------.....-....-.........,,-..,.,,-.., _.._",-" --,,-......--.,---..--.....-.........------ BC X .-.-.....".-"",."....,."......,.J.",.,-."..-....-- X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X oe repair services X X X X vities X X X X X X X BN1 cc-cl CC-F1 FC -"-,,., ,-,..__.,-_......_-"....,-"._- -..--...-..--..-." X X ..-.-.---.-. -......"-................,,........-......,.--.-,--....--... - .....-......-.....-....-,.-...........,.. -,.,..-..,-.--.-......,............,.-......--.......-........ --..... -...,--..-....- x --.,.-........-.....".--,."...,-""'.,--.--........-,.-..--.,-..- -,., ".--."--.,.,,..,.,. ..........,..-......-,.--. g X ---...-.-...-,.-.--."'-.,....-,--.--." -""'-."'.-..".'.--..-.-".---'" X ~~~~~~~,~~~.~~~~".Tãb~~O pti c~rI===:= =--=~~~ ~=::~:::".:~::=!:=:~:~..~:~:"....""""+."""._""='- ".,..".""",.,.,,-...,..----........-.....-.-.---¡-,-,X -.-- ,~_.._..".... "-"."-",....~,._......_,,,,. ..,._..,..._....~_..,.,..............I..__.._.,........._"" X X X ,.-..-...-...--.--....,,-.,,---.,.--.........-""."--.-t--X-"'--.. -......................-..-..- X-......,..,.."..J-_......, (Type A (Type A or -0!1)--I:::=~::..:~=:=]=:~:~~=..~:::::::I:~..-::=~;- X I L X I ~. -..............--- .......-,-....-..-..................... ...........-..-...UL2 mOO ~F J 1-- Ti .-.-..........-.- X (Type A or -..""""."'."""'.'.-.'.'.-........".."--"-.."'.-...-...>---1:3..)-, X -..,.---.-...-..--. 1:\2004 Code Amendments\Freeway Zone\O 13004 Comparison Use Chart.doc/O 1/30/2004 .. - 3 - Jurisdiction! Zone Name Permitted Uses Min. Lot Size/ Max. Coverage/ Max. Building Height Elk Grove CA Auto Commercial (AC) Auto sales, rental and leasing, Motorcycle, and Truck sale sand service Boat sales, rental, repair Marine supply Water recreational equipment sales Computer sales and service Furniture and equipment sales and rental Medical/Dental office Towing service Lawn and garden equipment sales and repair Bar, brew pub, restaurant Physical fitness studio Supennarket Gun shop Pet store Church Bank, office insurance, real estate Public faciilities Conditional Use: Dance hall/disco, Movie Theatre, Indoor recreation facility, Bike sales and rental Min, Lot Size: IO,OOO square feet Height Limit: 40 feet Lot coverage: No requirements TABLE III Red BluffCA Freeway Oriented CommerciaP A District (FC) Automobile service stations; automobile sales and repair Towing service Parking lot Transit facility Convenience store and drive through business Hotels/motels Public unitities Min. lot size: 6,000 sq. ft Max building coverage: 60% Max surface coverage: 80% Max building height: 50 feet Related Commercial: service related - banks, savings and loans, barbershops, beauty shops, cleaners, tailors, shoe repair, travel service, government, civic; art galleries, bakery, bookstores, camera, florist, jewelry stores, gift shops, liquor stores, restaurants, cafes (no drive-in) Office Open Space: Parks, playgrounds, agricultural, plant nurseries Accessory Uses: Sale of used cars and trucks, Sale of new trucks, sale of vehicle parts, auto repair, comparable uses Other Uses- (only allowed if certain siting and design conditions are met and uses do not detract from development of area for auto sales): RV sales, boat sales, motorcycle sales, lease or rent of automobiles, clubs and meeting halls, health and athletic clubs, convention centers, hotels and motels Minimum parcel size: Specialized Commercial: 1.8 acres Related Commercial: 2.0 acres Office Commercial: 2.0 acres (smaller parcel size is only allowed if an existing parcel) Parcels may be developed in phases Building Height: shall not exceed a height equal or lesser to the horizontal distance from the building and an adjacent arterial street or four stories in height, whichever is greater. No building w/in 58' of the curb face shall exceed two stories. No building shall provide vision into an ad'acent residential structure or EXHIBIT- l Jurisdiction! Elk Grove CA Red Bluff CA PAC ~1=~'L":' SI Zone Name Auto Commercial (AC) Freeway Oriented Commercial Development Area Five: Auto. District (FC) MalV Restricted Commercial residential yard Setbacks Rear/Side: 25' between property line Front setback: 10 feet Setbacks From Street frontage: and structure if near residential dependent upon particular street property, otherwise 0' Rear setbacklO' frontage and range from 20' to 58' Property line adjacent to freeway: Side: none unless abutting a r.o.W., 10' then 5' Adjacent to similar or nonresidential land: 20' Adjacent to residential land: 50' Landscaping Minimum 5' wide along R.O.W Street frontage: varies depending on particular frontage from min. Minimum 6' high masonry wall plus 18't033' landscaping along property line if abutting residential Adjacent to similar or nonresidential land: setback area 10' wide landscaping for perimeter fully landscaped. adjacent to freeway Adjacent to residential land: 20' 5' wide perimeter parking lot minimum landscaped buffer landscaping plus one interior landscaped island per every 8 parking stalls Sign Req. The Special Sign Corridors are designated along state highways, county roads, and rivers which accommodate the traveling public. These types of corridors have traditionally attracted large, bright, gaudy signs in an effort to attract the attention of the traveler to a business or a product which mayor may not be related to the travel-way or the needs of the traveler. The purpose of the regulations in this section is to make provisions for signs that identifY the name and type of business in an aesthetic manner that compliments the architecture of the building and serves the needs of the traveling public. 335-31. Permitted Signs (a) Identification Signs. Identification signs attached to a building and which are visible from the freeways, County roads, and County routes, and all freestanding signs are subject to the provisions of Section 335-15. Identification signs attached to a building and which are not visible from the freeways, roads and routes designated are subject to the provisions of the Zoning Code .relating to signs J urisdiction/ Zone Name Parking Req. Elk Grove CA Auto Commercial (AC) Building Frontage. The total area of all signs attached to a building with less than fifty (50) foot setback from the street right-of-way line shall not exceed two (2) square feet per foot of building frontage. For buildings with fifty (50) feet or greater setback from the street right-of-way line, the total area of all signs shall not exceed three (3) square feet per foot of building frontage. For parcels fronting on more than one public street, sign area entitlement may be based on anyone of the street frontages, not the total frontage; however, once the allotted sign area has been computed, it may be distributed over both faces of the building fronting on the public streets. (b) Driveway And Parking Lot Directional Signs. Private directional signs indicating ingress and egress shall be permitted at each entry and exit provided the sign does not exceed four (4) square feet. (c) OfT-Site Directional Sign. Parcels with no public street frontage and being served by access easement, mutual parking agreement, or a private road may have one (1) monument sign at the point of access to a public street or private street provided: (1) Maximum area is twenty-four (24) square feet for a monument sign. (2) Maximum height is six feet. (3) Minimum setback is ten (10) feet from existing public street improvements or right-of-way line as provided in Section 335-09.5(g), or as otherwise determined by enforcement agency, when other than a public street. (4) Spacing shall be fifty (50) feet from any other freestanding sign and shall be located within a landscaped area with a minimum ofthree (3) feet in all directions. General retail: 4.5 spacesll,OOO sq. ft GFA Red Bluff CA Mall/ Restricted Commercial J urisdiction/ Zone Name Elk Grove CA Auto Commercial (AC) Offices: 4.5 spaceslI,OOO squ ft. GFA Furniture, major appliance, floor covering, pian%rgan sales: 1.2/1,000 sq. f1. GFA Outdoor sales-Auto sales(boat, trailer, lumber): 5 spaces for first 5,000 square feet sales and I space for each addl.l,OOO sq. ft sales area for a Maximum 20 spaces plus 1 space per each employee. Indoor bulding material sales: 4.5 spaces per 1,000 sq, ft GFA Auto repair/service: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Red Bluff CA Freeway Oriented Commercial District (FC) Auto parts store: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. f1. g.f.a. Convenience Store: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. f1. g.f.a. Furniture store: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. g.f.a. Gas station: 1 per 4 pumps plus 1 per service bay Restaurant: I per every 4 seats AGmntaeKv~),~ .,. Mall/ Restricted Commercial requirements of Chapter 22.74 of this code, the director of community development may require additional parking spaces and improvements so as to enhance the design of the development and to provide a hannonious circulation scheme between adjacent developments. (b) Adequate off-street parking shall be provided to accommodate all parking needs for employees, visitors, demonstration, rental, service, display and storage vehicles on the site or other sites approved by the city council. Employee parking shall be prohibited in adjacent residential developments. If parking requirements increase as a result of a change in use or number of employees, additional off-street parking shall be provided to satisfY the intent of Sections 22.15.210 through 22.15.390 and Chapter 22.74 of this code. (c) The number of display, new and used car storage, and service or repair storage parking spaces shall be determined by the director of community development, and may be in accordance with the "Space Guide and Facility Recommendations" as published by the manufacturer and established for the specific make of car authorized to occupy the automobile facility. Said parking guide shall be submitted to the director of community development as an attachment to the precise plan and shall be certified to be the most recent copy of said parking standards. The required number of parking spaces shall be determined by the "guides" established parking requirements for the anticipated annual sales potential plus one- half of that planned potential re uirement. 22-XXX New vehicle sales. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (Fe) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART USE RetãIT establishment providing for new vehicle sales including boats, motorcycles and recreational vehicle RV sales ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS 9 Minimums S ~ Required Yards ;::¡ g ~ -o¡:\:; ~ <> ~ CI: .!:: <> ::> .- 0"> <> <> c.::c.:: Process III <> .!:: V) Õ ...J ë e \.I.. ,-... .c u '" ~ .., -0 Cñ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES æ 0,) c.:: '- <> 0 .. .. ::I §'G 'ü S :tv) 35 ft. above average building elevation V> 0,) ~ 0. -0 v) ~ OJ) ,- c: ::1'- 0"..>0: 0,) æ c.::¡:>.. ZONE FC acres Retail I, If any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft, from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure facilities: I shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of 50 ft. from the property line of the for every 300 residential zone. sq. ft of 2, ~e height oftha~ portion ofa struc!ure I~cat~d 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft, above average building elevation to a gross floor maxImum of 55 ft., If all of the followmg criteria are met: See notes I _I area a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and 2 b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft, the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and Oth '. c, An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d ern:lsed d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. etermme b 3. Used vehicle sales, gasoline service stations, ~ervice, maintenance and body shops, car washes, auto supply stores, hazardous waste on a cas:- y- treatment and storage facilities, and coffee shops are only pennitted as an accessory use to a new vehicle sales establishment. case basIs 4. Gas pump islands, canopies, and covers over pump islands may not be closer than 25 ft. to any property line, unless located adjacent to a residential zone, in which case the setback shall be 50 ft. Outdoor vehicle display areas and service areas may not be closer than lOft. to any property line, unless located adjacent to a residential zone, in which case the setback shall be 50 ft. 5. Auto and boat body repair and/or painting may be pennitted under this section only if: a, Building layout and design mitigates impact of dust, fumes, noise, glare, odor, or any other discharge on neighboring uses and natural systems; protects neighboring uses and natural systems from accidental spillage, leakage, or discharge of hazardous material and pollutants; b. All storage, operations, service, painting, and repair are conducted within enclosed buildings. 6, Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way. 7, Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities must comply with state citing criteria adopted in accordance with Chapter 70.105 RCW, 8. No use or activity shall be conducted that involves the release of toxic or noxious gases, fumes, or odors. 9. No use or activity shall be conducted that results in the contamination ofstonnwater, surface water, or groundwater pursuant to Chapter 21, ~~ ~m 10. Public address speakers (PA systems) sha!1 not be audible from an adjacent residential zone. 11. No maximum lot coverage is established, Instead, the buildable area will be detennined by other site development requiremen~., r~d buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. '" -r 12, For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX. Areas where vehicles are displayed are not subjec~,¡e ~g lot design requirements of Section 22- I 634(b), m - 13. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. Areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject tq'tlfe þar«J¡]ot landscaping requirements of Section 22-1567. 1- ~ - 14. Areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the provisions of Article XIII, Section 1 I 13, Outdoor Activities and Sto~ ~ 15. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII, ~ I 16. For noise standards that apply to the project, see Chapter 10, Article II, V- 17. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. . "'.. I :-L - "1 '" .. L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. -0 » G) m \- ~ <.)~ ;-n11Þ1" .. Process I, n, ill and IV Ie desc&ed in §§ 22-351-22-356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386-22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. 22-XXX Retail. The followin USE Retail establishment selling household goods and furnishings, household appliances and home electronics Retail Outlet centers lations and notes set forth in this section: U N êi3 Õ ,...¡ ;¡:: (.) '" ~ U '0 êi3 :. u ~ '- u 0 .. - ::I ~õ .¡¡ .5 ::ten 8 '" 0. '0 en U OJ) .. c '5 :;;¡ 8":. ~p., USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES 1. If any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft, from the property line of the residential zone. 2, Ifapproved through Process III, the height of that portion ofa structure located 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft, above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 ft., ifall of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft, above average building elevation; and c. An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. 3, Assembly or manufacture of goods on the subject property is pennitted only if: a, The assembly or manufacture is clearly accessory to an allowed use conducted on the subject property and is directly related to and dependent on this allowed use; and b. The assembled or manufactured goods are available for purchase and removal from the subject property and are for sale only to retail purchasers; and c. There are no outward appearance or impacts from the assembly or manufacture. 4. Restaurants, not exceeding 7,500 square feet in gross floor area, are allowed as an accessory use to the outlet center. 5, Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way. 6. Outdoor use, activity, and storage is regulated by Article XIII, Section 1113, 7. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be detennined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. -c m 8. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX. » X 9, For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. 1 O. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. ~ J: II. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. U ~ . -- 35 ft. above Retail facilities: average I for every 300 Possible I building sq. ft of gross Process elevation floor area III See Note 2 'á 0 ~ See notes I _\1 for each 100 2 sq. ft. of gross floor area for restaurants Process I, II, ill and IV are describel in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, . 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386-22-411,' 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS sa Minimums S ~ Required Yards ;:¡ 8 e (.: 'Op., ¡.:¡ U ~ ~ .: U ::1.- r:!'> U U ~~ For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. - ~ For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. '..J 11 -- 22-XXX Entertainment, etc. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (FC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS e Minimums S ~ Required Yards ;;J g e" -.:10: ¡.¡ ..;!: cz:: .!::.. ::> .- 0'"> .. " ¡:.:;¡:,: USE Retail establishment providing entertainment, recreational or cultural services or activities Golf driving range Process II INone Possible Process III See Note 2 Process I, ll, ill and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22.356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. " N Ci3 Õ ,..¡ ,-.., .c (,) '" ~ " -.:I Ci3 ~ ¡¡. 20 ft.IS ft. IS ft. See notes 1,2 and 5 t! æ " ¡:,: <,.., " 0 ... - ::> '§¡ü .¡¡ .s :I:CI:) 35 ft. above average building elevation ~ '" "'" ..,CI:) ,~ gf ::> '- 8"~ ¡:,:~ USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Determined 1.1fany portion ofa structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure on a case-by- shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft, from the property. line of the case basis residential zone. 2. If approved through Process In, the height of that portion of a structure located 100 ft, or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft, above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 ft., if all of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft, the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and c. An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. 3, No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 4. Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way, 5. Outdoor use, activity, and storage is regulated by Article XIII, Section 1113, 6. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX, 5. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. 7. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. 8. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. 9. Minor and supporting structures constructed as a functional requirement of golf driving ranges may exceed the applicable height limitation provided that the director of community development services determines that such structures will not significantly impact adjoining properties. See notes I, 2 and 5 !- U ", ~ I 0 L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. -om »x -O-I mffi ~F ()¡ ,'on ¡... For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq, For details regarding required yards, see § 22.1131 et seq, . .. 22-XXX Hotel. The following uses shall be permitted in the fteeway commercial (FC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS 2 Minimums . ~ ~ Required Yards ~ " ;:¡ g " -o¿: ¡..¡ "¡t ~ .!::" :s .- 0-> " " ~~ Process II INone 120 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 35 ft. above lOne for each See notes 1,2 and average guest room. Possible I 18 building Process elevation III USE Hõtët " .~ CIJ Õ ,...¡ See Note 2 Proce!! I, n, ill and IV are described in §§ 22.35\ - 22-356, 22.361 - 22.370, 22.386 - 22-411, 22-'131 - 22-460, respectively. USE ZONE CHART 1:: e ~ :ê' u '" ~ " -0 CiS 8 '" p., -0(1) ~ bJ) .- c :s .- 0-"'" ~£ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES ZONE FC Co. U ;: 3 'tj¡ü .¡¡ g :tCIJ ~ " ~ See note 3 I. If any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft. from the property line of the residential zone. 2. If approved through Process Ill, the height of that portion ofa structure located 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft. above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 ft., if all ofthe following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft, the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and c. An increase in height above 35 ft, will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan, 3, If this use includes accessory meeting, convention or other facilities that will be used by persons other than overnight guests at the hotel, the city may require additional parking on a case-by-case basis, based on the extent and nature of these accessory facilities, 4. Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way, 5. Outdoor use, activity, and storage is regulated by Article Xlll, Section 1113. 6. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be detennined by other site development requirements, i.e" required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 7. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIx. 8. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. 9. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIll. 10. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property, See notes 1 . 2 .ro IT 1 »>< (;)'- L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. -am »x (;):1: For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq, -ml,õ ~~ U. ~ -..... mro ~~ 0, ~ 11 ' :-. 22-XXX Public utility. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (Fe) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: f2 DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS ~ Minimums « ~ ReQuired Yards .Ef ~ 8 ~ ;:¡ 0 -- æ r" ""~ '5"'u ~ ¡.¡ ~~ 1:! ~ ~3 ~'" =z: 'S .!:! Vj ë ';; ih ü 'S 8 8" ~ õ e :2 ~ '¡¡ .s 8" 2- ¡:,:: ¡:,:: ,...¡ ¡.z.. C/) ¡:,:: :c C/) ¡:,:: C/) USE Public utility I Process II INone Public Utility Public 20 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. Utilities: See Notes I, 2 and 3b5 ft 7 a ove average building elevation Determined on a case-by-case basis. Possible Process III See note 2 See notes I and 2 Process I, ll, ill and IV are described in §§ 22.3Sl - 22.356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. -efT ... ~IÎ G)- mOJ ~~ USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES 1. If any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft, from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and tlie structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft. from the property line of the residential zone. 2. If approved through Process Ill, the height of that portion ofa structure located loa ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft., ifall of the following criteria are met: a, The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and c. An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d, The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan, 3. May be pennitted only iflocating this use in the immediate area of the subject property is necessary to pennit effective service to the area to be served. 4. If detennined necessary to mitigate visual and noise impacts to surrounding properties, the city may require additional landscaping or buffers on a case-by-case basis. 5, No maximum lot coverag~ is established. Instead, the buildable area will bcdetennined by other site development requirements, i.e. required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc, 6. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX. 7. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. 8. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIll. 9. Refer to §22-946 et seq to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. CFor other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. -em »x r;y-r mõ5 ~F ~i- For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. 22-XXX Public Transit Shelter The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (Fe) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART f2 DIRECTIONS: FIRST. read down to find use, " THEN, across for REGULATIONS S Minimums ---- ~ ~ Required Yards ;:;¡ 8 e e" "O~ ~ ,1:: ~ :0 ,- <3'> .. ., eo:: eo:: ., N Ci5 Õ .J 'é e f,1., .-.. .c g ~ ., "0 Ci5 ::= ., eo:: ... u 0 ... - :0 §'G '¡¡ .s :I;tI:) Transit Shelter: 15 ft, above average building elevation O) c ~ ~ "0 ~ rI) 'S 8 r:r~ ., c. ~tI:) ZONE FC USE SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Public transit I Process I INone I Public Transit shelter Shelter ~ft, None I, For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX, 2, There are no landscaping requirements for this use. The larger site on which it is located is subject to the landscaping requirements of Article XVII. 3, For sign reqùirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. 4, Refer to §22-946 et seq to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property, Process 1, II. !II and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22-41 I, 22.,,131 - 22-460, respectively, L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1 131 et seq, ... -em »x G):I: mffi ~F # '. . '--l~ I ,11 ! I '" .. -em :Þx G)I mffi - -~ urn ITl 22-XXX Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercia!iFC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ~ wireless service facility See note 5 for allowed types of PWSFs USE ZONE CHART ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS g Minimums S ~ Required Yards ;J g c" "OQ: I.:i <> ~ =: .!:: <> =.- a'> <> <> ~~ <> .\::! (/) Õ ..J 'ë e \.t. ,-.. .c g ~ <> "0 i:i5 See note INone see ¡See ¡See 2 note 1 note note 1 1 Process I, II, III and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. æ <> IX 'õ ~ - = -§¡ü 'ü .5 ::t(/) Refer to §22-967 for maximum heights for allowed types of PWSFs See note 3 ~~ ~ mæ ~F ( '\ \ .:~ ¡C\\ - ~ 0 V> "0 ê ..J See [Not note allowed 4 on a PWSF ~ i:i5 I þ) c: :.¡;¡ æ ¡:,.. "0 ~ V> '6 B a'", " '" IX(/) ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES N/A 11. For developed sites, the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the subject property, For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new freestanding PWSFs shall be 20 ft. for front, side, and rear yards. 2. Subject to meeting all applicable development standards, the review process used shall be Process I, except for the following proposals: a, Process III for the following proposals: (1) The PWSF is located within 300 ft. ofa residential zone; (2) The PWSF is located on a structure that is a residence or school or contains a residence or school; or (3) The PWSF is a new freestanding PWSF, b. Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodating four or more providers, 3. Maximum allowed height for a new freestanding PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to 100 ft" plus any height granted under § 22-1047. A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120 ft. if there are two or more providers, except that a lattice tower of between 120 ft. and 150 ft. will be allowed under a combined application off our or more providers, 4. All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII of this chapter, and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations. At a minimum, a five ft, type III landscaping area shall be required around the facility, unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened. 5. New freestanding PWSFs are allowed subject to height limits and collocation provisions. PWSFs are allowed on existing towers, on private buildings and structures, on publicly used structures not located in public rights-of-way, on existing structures located in the BPA trail, and on existing structures in appropriate public rights-of-way, Refer to § 22-967 for development standards applicable to allowed types ofPWSFs, 6. For all other development standards, see Article XIII, Section 22-966 et at. For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. -om :Þ-X G):I: mæ r--F t -- I ~ íTI EXH I B IT --- -, PAGE-"'OF~ Federal Way City Code Chapter 22, Article XIII, "Supplementary District Regulations" 22-966 Personal wireless service facilities (pWSF). (a) Purpose. This section addresses the issues of location and appearance associated with personal wireless service facilities. It provides adequate siting opportunities through a wide range of locations and options which minimize safety hazards and visual impacts sometimes associated with wireless communications technology. The siting of facilities on existing buildings or structures, collocation of several providers' facilities on a single support structure, and visual mitigation measures are required, unless otherwise allowed by the city, to maintain neighborhood appearance and reduce visual clutter in the city. (b) Definitions. Any words, terms or phrases used in this section which are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in FWCC 22-1. (c) Exemptions. The following antennas and facilities are exempt from the provisions of this section and shall be permitted in all zones consistent with applicable development standards as outlined in the use zone charts, Article XI of this chapter, District Regulations: (1) Wireless communication facilities used by federal, state, or local public agencies for temporary emergency communications in the event of a disaster, emergency preparedness, and public health or safety purposes. (2) Industrial processing equipment' and scientific or medical equipment using frequencies regulated by the FCC; provided such equipment complies with all applicable provisions of FWCC 22-960, Rooftop Appurtenances, and Chapter 22 FWCC, Article XIII, Division 5, Height. (3) Citizen band radio antennas or antennas operated by federally licensed amateur ("ham") radio operators; provided such antennas comply with all applicable provisions of FWCC 22-960, Rooftop Appurtenances, and Chapter 22 FWCC, Article XIII, Division 5, Height. (4) Satellite dish antennas less than two meters in diameter, including direct-to-home satellite services, when used as a secondary use of the property; provided such antennas comply with all applicable provisions of FWCC 22-960, Rooftop Appurtenances, and Chapter 22 FWCC, Article XIII, Division 5, Height. (5) Automated meter reading (AMR) facilities for the purpose of collecting utility meter data for use in the sale of utility services, except for whip or other antennas greater than two feet in length; provided the AMR facilities are within the scope of activities permitted under a valid franchise agreement between the utility service provider and the city. (6) Routine maintenance or repair of a wireless communication facility and related equipment excluding structural work or changes in height, dimensions, or visual impacts of the antenna, tower, or buildings; provided, that compliance with the standards of this chapter are maintained. (d) Prioritized locations. The following sites shall be the required order of locations for proposed PWSFs, including antenna and equipment shelters. In proposing a PWSF in a particular location, the applicant shall analyze the feasibility of locating the proposed PWSF in each of the higher priority locations and document, to the city's satisfaction, why locating the PWSF in each higher priority location and/or zone is not being proposed. In order of preference, the prioritized locations for PWSFs are as follows: (1) Structures located in the BP A trail. A PWSF may be located on any existing support structure currently located in the easement upon which are located U.S. Department of Energy! Bonneville Power Administration ("BP A") Power Lines regardless of underlying zoning. 02002 Code Publishing Co. Page 1 EXHIB'T_~ PAGE-LJF~ EXHIBIT . . 1 P AGE-ßOF-IL-- (2) Existing broadcast, relay and transmission towers. A PWSF may be located on an existing site or tower where a legal wireless telecommunication facility is currently located regardless of underlying zoning. If an existing site or tower is located within a one mile radius of a proposed PWSF location, the applicant shall document why collocation on the existing site or tower is not being proposed, regardless of whether the existing site or tower is located within the jurisdiction of the city. (3) Publicly used structures. If the city consents to such location, a PWSF may be located on existing public facilities within all zoning districts, such as water towers, utility structures, fire stations, bridges, and other public buildings, provided the public facilities are not located within public rights-of-way. (4) Appropriate business, commercial, and city center zoned sites. A PWSF may be located on private buildings or structures within appropriate business, commercial, and city center zoning districts. The preferred order of zoning districts for this category of sites is as follows: BP - Business Park FC - Freeway Commercial CP-l - Corporate Park OP through OP-4 - Office Park CC-C - City Center Core CC-F - City Center Frame BC - Community Business . (5) Appropriate public rights-of-way. For the purposes of this section, appropriate public rights-of-way shall be defined as including those public rights-of-way with functional street classifications of principal arterial, minor arterial, and principal collector. A PWSF may be located on existing structures in appropriate public rights-of-way. Structures proposed for location of PWSFs shall be separated by at least 330 linear feet. Within any residential zone, neighborhood business (BN) zone, or professional office (PO) zone, there shall be no more than one PWSF located on an existing structure. Location of a PWSF on an existing structure in an appropriate public right-of-way shall require a right-of-way penn it in addition to the required use process approval. The preferred order of functional street classifications for this category of sites is as follows: Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Principal Collector If the PWSF is proposed to be located in an appropriate public right-of-way and the surrounding uses or zoning are not the same, that portion of the right-of-way with the most intensive use and/or zoning shall be the preferred location. If the PWSF is proposed to be located in an appropriate public right-of-way and surrounding uses or zoning are the same, the preferred location shall be that portion of the right-of-way with the least adverse visual impacts. (6) If the applicant demonstrates to the city's satisfaction that it is not technically possible to site in a prioritized location, the city reserves the right to approve alternative site locations if a denial would be in violation of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, as detennined by the city. (Ord. No. 97-300, § 3, 9-16-97; Ord. No. 00-363, § 14, 1-4-00; Ord. No. 01-399, § 3, 8-7-01) «:>2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 2 EXHIBIT H PAGE---2.-_0F t FWCP-ChapterTwo, land Use EXHIBIT_I..__- . - - ------ P AGE -'-' ~. J ~-_S L --- RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE CHAPTERS 2.2 The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all FWCP chapters. Internal consistency among the chapters of the FWCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient use of limited resources. Below is a brief discussion of how the Land Use chapter relates to the other chapters of the FWCP. Economic Development Federal Way's economy is disproportionately divided. Based on PSRC's 2000 Covered Estimates by jurisdiction" retail and service industries compose more than 70 percent of Federal Way's employment base. Covered estimates are jobs that are covered by unemployment insurance. Dependence on retail trade stems primarily from the City's evolution into a regional shopping destination for South King County and northeast Pierce County. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Tukwila and the Auburn SuperMall, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To improve Federal Way's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy. A diversified economy should achieve a better balance between jobs and housing and supports the City's quality of life. In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the following: . A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing. . Community Business and Business Park development in the South 348th Street area. . Continued development of West Campus. . Continued development of East Campus (Weyerhaeuser Corporate and Office Park properties). . Redevelopment and development of the SR-99 corridor into an area of quality commercial and mixed use development. . Continued use of design standards for non-single_family areas. . Freeway commercial development focusing on attracting and capturing those retail dollars presently being lost to other communities and complementing existing retail uses in the community. 2003 Comp Plan Update EXHIBIT__- .t PÄGE ~ 11-4 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use EXHIBIT_. I PAGEMOF ....I.L- The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see' the Comprehensive Plan Designations Map II-!). A complete discussion of economic development is set forth in the Economic Development chapter. Capital Facilities Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, parks and open space, and surface water management. Infrastructure and Urban Services The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities and the maintenance of existing facilities. As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be financed by voter-approved bonds, impact fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), and money from the City's general fund. To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements. Water Availability Based on reports from the Lakehaven Utility District, the estimated available yield from the underlying aquifers is 10.1 million gallons per day (MGD, 1 O-year average based on average annual rainfall). The District controls which well to use, thus which aquifers are being pumped from, based on a number of considerations including water levels and rainfall. In order to reduce detrimental impacts to its groundwater supplies in the recent past, the District has also augmented its groundwater supplies with wholesale water purchased from the City of Tacoma through water system interties. In addition, the District has entered into a long-term agreement with the City of Tacoma and other South King County utilities to participate in the construction of Tacoma's Second Supply Project (a seeond water diversion from the Green River), which will provide additional water supplies to the region. As a result, the water levels in the aquifers have remained stable, and the District's water supply capacity will increase to 14.7 MGD on an annual average basis when Tacoma's Second Supply Project is completed in 2004. Concentrating growth, along with conservation measures, should help to conserve water. Water Quality Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City. Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water; and, continued health of the City's streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining 2003 Comp Plan Update EXH!B\ r . .r. PAGE. --2. "r_.._"- 11.5 FWCP-ChapterTwo. Land Use EXHIBIT~-. , P AGE --'-'-'~) '-:5 & LUP36 Develop business parks that fit into their surroundings by grouping similar industries in order to reduce or eliminate land use conflicts, allow sharing of public facilities and services, and improve traffic flow and safety. LUP37 Limit retail uses to those that serve the needs of people employed in the area. Commercial City Center Core The intent of establishing the City Center Core is to create a higher density, mixed-use designation where office, retail, government uses, and residential uses are concentrated. Other uses such as cultural/civic facilities, community services, and housing will be highly eneouraged. City Center Frame The City Center Frame designation will have a look and feel similar to the Core and will provide a zone of less dense, mixed-use development physicalIy surrounding a portion of the City Center Core. Together, they are meant to complement each other to create a "downtown" area. A more detailed description, along with goals and policies regarding the City Center Core and Frame, can be found in the City Center chapter. Community Business The Community Business designation encompasses two major retail areas of the City. It covers the "strip" retail areas along SR-99 and the large "bulk" retail area found near the South 348th Street area, approximately between SR-99 and 1-5. Community Business allows a large range of uses and is the City's largest retai I designation in tenns of area. The Community Business designation generally runs along both sides of SR-99 from South 272nd to South 348th. A wide range of development types, appearance, ages, function, and scale can be found along SR-99. Older, single-story developments provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment. Due in part to convenient access and available land, the South 348th Street area has become a preferred location for large bulk retailers such as Eagle Hardware, Home Depot, and Costco. Due to the size of these facilities, the challenge will be to develop these uses into well functioning, aesthetically pleasing retail environments. To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionally attractive, revised development standards, applied through Community Business zoning and Community Design. Guidelines, address design quality, mixed-use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site design, modulation, and setback requirements are also addressed. Through regulations in the Community Business land use chart, the size and scale of hotels, motels, and office uses have been limited in scale so as not to compete with the City Center. 2003 Comp Plan Update EXl:ilBJ T PAGE -3 1: ,: ., 11-21 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use Goal LUG6 Policies LUP38 LUP39 EXHIBIT ,- _. ----- PAGE~1:J~-'1. Transform Community Business areas into vital, attractive, mixed-use areas that appeal to pedestrians and motorists and enhance the community's image. Encourage transformation of Pacific Highway (SR-99) Community Business corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. Encourage auto-oriented large bulk retailers to locate in the South 348th Street Community Business area. Freeway Commercial The Freewav Commercial designation is intended for areas that are adjacent to Interstate 5 and SR 18 interchanges with convenient freeway access and visibility. Freeway Commercial areas are typically large in size (five acres or greater). The range of commercial land uses pennitted in these areas is limited to uses that are difficult to site in the city's other commercially designated areas due to their large site size requirements and/or difficulty in adapting to pedestrian-oriented areas. Freeway Commercial areas are particularly suitable for automobile sales, home furnishings centers, and related retail and service uses that require large tracts of land, convenient freeway access and visibility. Goal LUG7 Policies LUP40 LUP41 LUP42 Encourage the development of limited areas with high levels of freeway access and visibility as suitable locations for freeway-oriented businesses to locate within the city in a cohesive development pattern that also meets the community's product and service needs. Encourage freeway oriented uses to locate in Freewav Commercial-designated areas. Encourage quality regional destination retail development through the utilization of appropriate design guidelines and development standards. The development of freeway commercial areas should respond to the needs of consumers by providing for ease of access and circulation and convenient grouping of complementary uses. EXt:WB- ~ "T :r ¡ ~, PAGE~OF -" 11-22 2003 Camp Plan Update FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use LUP43 EXHIBIT___J P AGE -H'o F -"-- Create additional development standards to mitigate impacts to neighboring residential uses. Neighborhood Business There are a dozen various sized nodes of Neighborhood Business located throughout the City. These nodes are areas that have historically provided retail and/or services to adjacent residential areas. The FWCP recognizes the importance of firmly fixed boundaries to prevent commercial intrusion into adjacent neighborhoods. Neighborhood Business areas are intended to provide convenient goods (e.g., groceries and hardware) and services (e.g., dry cleaners, dentist, bank) at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses. Developments combining residential and commercial uses provide a convenient living environment within these nodes. In the future, attention should be given to design features that enhance the appearance or function of these areas. Improvements may include sidewalks, open space and street trees, and parking either on street or oriented away from the street edge. The function of neighborhood business areas can also be enhanced by safe pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections to surrounding neighborhoods. The need to address expansion or intensification may occur in the future depending on population growth. Future neighborhood business locations should be carefully chosen and sized to meet the needs of adjacent residential areas. Goal LUG7 Policies LUP40 LUP41 LUP42 LUP43 LUP44 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. -. Integrate retail developments into surrounding neighborhoods through attention to quality design and function. Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and services. Encourage neighborhood retail and personal services to locate at appropriate locations where local economic demand and design solutions demonstrate compatibility with the neighborhood. Retail and personal services should be encouraged to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. Neighborhood Business centers should consist of neighborhood scale retail and personal services. EXHlBLT__- - ! PAGE S .)~, 2003 Comp Plan Update 11-23 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use EXHIBiT~. I P AGE -3.!- C) F --U.-.- the PAS will not have to go through prolonged environmental review. This can be a powerful incentive for private development in the City Center. Subarea Plans Over the years, citizens from various areas of the City have come forth to testify before the Planning Commission and City Council regarding their neighborhood or business area. Development of subarea plans can lead to area specific visions and policies. This type of specific planning, developed with citizen input and direction, can lead to improved confidence and ownership in the community. Areas where subarea planning should be considered include: SR-99 Corridor, South 348th Street area, and Twin Lakes neighborhood. Incentives Develop an incentives program, for both residential and commercial development. Incentives should be substantial enough to attract development and should be used to create affordable and desired types of housing and to encourage development within the City Center. Table II-3 Land Use Classifications Comprehensive Plan Classification Zoning Classification Single Family - Low Density Residential Suburban Estates (SE), one dwelling unit per five acres Single Family - Medium Density Residential RS 35,000 & 15,000 Single Family - High Density Residential RS 9600, 7200, 5000 Multiple Family Residential RM 3600, 2400, 1800 City Center Core City Center Core City Center Frame City Center Frame Office Park Office Park, Office Park 1, 2, & 3 Professional Office Professional Office Community Business Community Business Business Park Business Park Freeway Commercial Freeway Commercial Neighborhood Business Neighborhood Business Corporate Park Corporate Park-l Commercial Recreation Office Park-4 Open Space & Parks A variety of zoning is assigned. EXHIBIT_- t. PAGE ~~)E' 2003 Comp Plan Update II-55 10-26 General prohibition. It is unlawful for any person to cause, or for any person in possession of property to allow to originate from the property, sound that is a public disturbance noise. (Ord. No. 90-37, § I(A), 2-20-90) EXHIBIT_- ..1 PAGEJIIl"OF-"- 10-27 Illustrative enumeration. The following sounds are public disturbance noises in violation of this article: (1) The frequent, repetitive or continuous sounding of any horn or siren attached to a motor vehicle, except as a warning of danger or as specifically pennitted or required by law. (2) The creation of frequent, repetitive or continuous sounds in connection with the starting, operation, repair, rebuilding or testing of any motor vehicle, motorcycle, off-highway vehicle or internal combustion engine within a residential district, so as to unreasonably disturb or interfere with the peace and comfort of owners or possessors of real property. (3) Yelling, shouting, whistling or singing on or near the public streets, particularly between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. or at any time and place as to unreasonably disturb or interfere with the peace and comfort of owners or possessors of real property. (4) The creation of frequent, repetitive or continuous sounds which emanate from any building, structure, apartment or condominium, which unreasonably disturbs or interferes with the peace and comfort of owners or possessors of real property, such as sounds from musical instruments, audio sound systems, band sessions or social gatherings. (5) Sound from motor vehicle audio sound systems, such as tape players, radios and compact disc players, operated at a volume so as to be audible greater than 50 feet from the vehicle itself. (6) Sound from portable audio equipment, such as tape players, radios, and compact disc players, operated at a volume so as to be audible greater than 50 feet from the source, and if not operated upon the property of the operator. (7) The squealing, screeching or other such sounds from motor vehicle tires in contact with the ground or other roadway surface because of rapid acceleration, braking or excessive speed around corners or because of such other reason; provided, that sounds which result from actions which are necessary to avoid danger shall be exempt from this section. (8) Sounds originating from construction sites, including but not limited to sounds from construction equipment, power tools and hammering between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 8:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends. (9) Sounds originating from residential property relating to temporary projects for the maintenance or repair of horns, grounds and appurtenances, including but not limited to sounds from lawnmowers, powered hand tools, snow removal equipment and composters between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends. (Ord. No. 90-65, § I(B), 7-3-90; Ord. No. 99-341, § 3, 5-4-99) EXHIBIT. PA.GE.._-' 1- '" , , .,... I ~2002 Code Publishing Co. Page I EXHIB!T__l FREEWAY COMMERCIAL mE~OF~ 22-1601 Signs in nonresidential zoning districts. (a) Freestanding signs. Permit applications for freestanding signs shall be designated as qualifying for a high profile, medium profile~ ef low profile sign, or highway profile category A- based upon criteria regarding both the size and zoning designation of the development. The sign profile designation shall control the sign types, sign height, sign area and number of signs allowed. Separate parcels or pads for single-tenant buildings that comply with all zoning requirements for single-tenant parcels, excluding access, and are not otherwise tied to an adjacent multi-tenant center by virtue of architectural style or theme, are permitted one freestanding monument or pedestal sign not to exceed a maximum sign area of 80 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 40 square feet. (1) High profile sign. a. Criteria. A subject property meeting all of the following criteria is permitted a high profile freestanding sign: I. A minimum of250 feet of frontage on one public right-of-way; 2. A zoning designation of city center core (CC-C) or city center frame (CC-F), or community business (BC); 3. A multiuse complex; and 4. A minimum site of 15 acres in size. b. Sign types. The following sign types are allowed for a high profile sign: 1. Pylon or pole signs; provided, however, that any pylon or pole sign must have more than one pole or structural support; 2. Pedestal signs; 3. Monument signs; 4. Tenant directory signs; and 5. Kiosks. Sign content for any pylon or pole sign, or for any pedestal or monument sign in lieu of a pylon or pole sign, may include electronic changeable messages, center identification signs and/or changeable copy signs. Any high profile sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. c. Sign height. A high profile sign shall not exceed the following maximum heights: 1. Pylon or pole sign: Twenty-five feet; 2. Pedestal or monument signs: Twelve feet if in lieu of a pylon or pole sign. Otherwise, pedestal and monument signs shall not exceed five feet; 3. Tenant directory or kiosk signs: Six feet unless the sign is set back a minimum of 50 feet from any public right-of-way, in which case it may be 10 feet. d. Sign area. A high profile sign shall not exceed the following maximum sign areas: 1. Pylon or pole sign: 400 square feet for the total of sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 200 square feet; 2. Pedestal or monument signs: 128 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one face exceeding 64 square feet; 3. Tenant directory or kiosk signs: 15 square feet per sign face. e. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a high profile sign may have the following maximum number of signs: EXH\B\1 PAGE' \<.--- 5 -- EXHIBIT I FREEWAY COMMERCIAL s~AGE...fI-2..0F.....1.2..- 1. Pylon or pole sign: One sign unless the subject property has an additional 500 feet of street frontage for a total of 750 feet of aggregate frontage on any public rights-of-way, in which case the subject property will be allowed one additional high profile sign, not to exceed a maximum of two such signs per subject property; 2. Pedestal or monument signs: If the pedestal or monument sign is in lieu of a pylon or pole sign, the number of signs allowed shall be determined pursuant to subsection (e)(l) of this section. In addition, two monument signs which identify the name of any multiuse complex are allowed, per entrance from a public right-of-way, not to exceed five feet in height; and 3. Tenant directory or kiosk signs: One sign per frontage on a public right-of-way. (2) Medium profile sign. a. Criteria. A subject property that does not qualify for a high profile sign pursuant to subsection (a)(l) of this section and is not a low profile sign by being zoned office park (OP) or professional office (PO) pursuant to subsection (a)(3) of this section is permitted a medium profile freestanding sign. b. Sign types. The following sign types are allowed for a medium profile sign: 1. Pedestal signs; and 2. Monument signs. Sign content for any medium profile sign may include electronic changeable messages, center identification signs and/or changeable copy signs. Any medium profile sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. c. Sign height. The height of a medium profile sign shall be calculated at the rate of 0.75 feet in the sign height for every 10 lineal feet of frontage on a public right-of-way; provided, however, that sign height shall be calculated at the rate of one and one-half feet in sign height for every 10 lineal feet of frontage on a public right-of-way for any multi-tenant complex; and provided further, that such sign shall not exceed a maximum height of 12 feet and every applicant is entitled to a minimum height of five feet. d. Sign area. For any multi-tenant complex, sign area allowed for a medium profile signs shall be calculated at the rate of two square feet per lineal foot of frontage on a public right-of- way not to exceed a maximum sign area of 128 square feet for the total of all sign faces on each permitted sign with no one sign face exceeding 64 square feet. For other uses, sign area allowed for medium profile sign shall be calculated at the rate of one square foot per lineal foot of frontage on a public right-of-way not to exceed a maximum sign area of 80 square feet for the total of all sign faces on each permitted sign with no one sign face exceeding 40 square feet. Notwithstanding the foregoing sign area calculations, every applicant is entitled to a minimum sign area of 50 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 25 square feet. e. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a medium profile sign may have one pedestal or monument sign for each street frontage. Each street frontage exceeding 300 linear feet and containing more than one vehicular access is permitted one additional freestanding sign. No subject property may contain more than three freestanding signs regardless of total linear street frontage and no one street frontage may have more than two freestanding signs. Freestanding signs shall be located a minimum distance of 200 feet from other freestanding signs on the same subject property. (3) Low profile sign. a. Criteria. A subject property located in the office park (OP) or professional office (PO) zone is permitted a low profile freestanding sign. b. Sign types. The following sign types are allowed for a low profile sign: 1. Pedestal signs; EXHIBIT PAGE f).. I( , , .,- EXHIBi1~_._J FREEWAY COMMERCIAL ~Á~EÆ-a)EJ-2. 2. Monument signs; and 3. Tenant directory signs. Sign content for any pedestal or monument sign may include center identification signs and/or changeable copy signs. Any low profile sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. c. Sign height. A low profile sign shall not exceed the following maximum heights: 1. Pedestal or monument signs: Five feet. 2. Tenant directory signs: Six feet unless the sign is set back a minimum of 50 feet from any public right-of-way, in which case it may be 10 feet. d. Sign area. I. Pedestal or monument signs: Sign area allowed for a low profile sign shall be calculated at the rate of one square foot per lineal foot of frontage on a public right-of-way; provided, however, that a low profile sign shall not exceed a maximum sign area of 80 square feet for the total of all sign faces on each pennitted sign with no one sign face exceeding 40 square feet, and every applicant is entitled to a minimum sign area of 50 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 25 square feet; 2. Tenant directory signs: 15 square feet per sign face. e. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a low profile sign may have the following maximum number of signs: 1. Pedestal or monument signs: One sign per frontage on a public right-of-way; and 2. Tenant directory signs: One sign per frontage on a public right-of-way. (4) Highway Profile Category A signs. In addition to the categories available in FWCC Section 22-1601(a)(1-3), a subject property may be permitted one of the following freestanding signs if it meets the criteria listed in highway profile category A below. a. Highway Profile Category A 1. Criteria. A subject property is permitted an additional highway profile category A freestanding sign if the subject property meets all of the following criteria: a. Abuts the right of way ofInterstate 5; b. Is located in a zoning designation of freeway commercial (FC). 2. Sign types. A pylon or pole sign is allowed, provided, that any pylon or pole sign must have more than one pole or structural support. Sign content for any pylon or pole sign, may include center identification signs, provided, however, that all font sizes used are a minumum 2.5 feet tall. Trademarks or copy write symbols are exempt from the font size requirement. Any highway profile category A may be an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. Electronic changeable copy and/or changeable copy signs are not permitted. The sign must be oriented toward the freeway (not the off-ramps) and be located near the property line closest to the freeway and be visible from the freeway. 3. Sign height. A highway profile category A sign shall not exceed 25 feet above the elevation of the nearest driving lane of the fr~eway at a point nearest to the proposed location of the sign. The sign height shall be measured by a licensed surveyor and the applicant shall be responsible for providing the surveyor. If the subject property has an elevation that is higher than the nearest driving lane of the freeway, then the sign shall be no taller than 15 feet above the average finshed ground elevation measured at the midpoint of the sign base. ',- t:.XH~t!i PAGE. \ K "~r ~ EXH I B IT --1 ; FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SI~E-4-", :J~ 4. Sign area. A highway profile category A sign shall not exceed 600 square feet for the total of sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 300 square feet. If the subject property has an elevation that is higher than the nearest driving lane of the freeway, then the sign area shall not exceed 400 square feet for the total of sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 200 square feet. 5. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a highway profile sign may have only one (I) highway profile category A sign per subject property. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for coordinating any such sign with the State of Washington Scenic Vistas Act. -t41W Combined sign package for adjacent property owners. The owners of two or more properties that abut or are separated only by a vehicular access easement or tract may propose a combined sign package to the city. The city will review and decide upon the proposal using process III. The city may approve the combined sign package if it will provide more coordinated, effective and efficient signs. The allowable sign area, sign type, sign height and number of signs will be detennined as ifthe applicants were one multi-tenant complex. (b) Building-mounted signs. (1) Sign types. The following sign types may be building-mounted signs and are allowed in all nonresidential zoning districts: a. Awning or canopy signs; b. Center identification signs; c. Changeable copy signs; d. Civic event signs; e. Directional signs, on-site; f. Electronic changeable message signs; g. Instructional signs; h. Marquee signs; i. Projecting signs; j. Tenant directory signs; k. Time and temperature signs; I. Under canopy signs; and m. Wall-mounted signs. Any building-mounted sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. (2) Sign height. No sign shall project above the roofline of the exposed building face to which it is attached. (3) Sign area. The total sign area of building-mounted signs for each business or tenant, excluding under canopy signs, shall not exceed seven percent of the exposed building face to which it is attached; provided, however, that no individual sign shall exceed a sign area of 240 square feet and every applicant is entitled to a minimum sign area of 30 square feet. A multi- tenant complex which does not use a freestanding sign may have two additional wall-mounted signs. No one sign may exceed seven percent of the exposed building face to which it is attached, to a maximum of 240 square feet per sign. This sign is in addition to any other tenant signs on that building face. (4) Number of signs. The number of building-mounted signs pennitted each user is dependent upon the surface area of the largest single exposed building face of his or her building as follows, excluding wall-mounted center identification signs: t:)\HH3c,ro PAGE" \( ~o~ 5 EXHIBIT t' FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SIGl'iSAG E -- -. ',. 1-', -fJ ~) F ~ Largest Exposed Maximum Building Face Number of Signs Less than 999 sq. ft. 2 1,000 - 2,999 sq. ft. 3 3,000 - 3,999 sq. ft. 4 4,000 and over sq. ft. 5 Buildings with more than 4,000 square feet on any exposed building face, with several clearly differentiated departments, each with separate exterior entrances, are permitted one sign for each different department with a separate exterior entrance, in addition to the five pennitted. No sign or signs may exceed the maximum area permitted for that building face except as may be specifically permitted by this code. However, an applicant is allowed to move allotted signs, as calculated in subsection (b)(4) from one building face to another. Each business or use shall be pennitted under canopy signs in addition to the other permitted building-mounted signs subject to the size and separation requirements set forth in FWCC 22- 1599( c )(2)(w). (c) Sign area multipliers. The sign area and sign number allowed, as set forth in subsection (a)(l)(d) of this section for high profile signs, (a)(2)(d) of this section for medium profile signs, and (a)(3)(d) of this section for low profile signs and subsection (b)(3) of this section for building-mounted signs may be increased in the following instances; provided, however, that in no event shall the sign exceed the maximum sign area allowed: (1) If no signs on the subject property have internally lighted sign faces, then the total sign area allowed may be increased by 25 percent. (2) If all signs, other than center identification signs, are building-mounted signs, the total sign area allowed may be increased by 25 percent. (3) A time and temperature sign may be included with any sign and such time and temperature signs shall not be included for purposes of calculating maximum sign area or maximum number of signs. (Ord. No. 95-235, § 4, 6-6-95; Ord. No. 96-270, § 3(F), 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99- 348, § 5,9-7-99; Ord. No. 99-357, § 6, 12-7-99) I::XH I B rr t< PAGE ____5 _~FJ EXHIBIT_- .1. P AGE ~~J\::52.- Federal Way City Code Chapter 22, Article XVII, "Landscaping" 22-1566 Landscaping requirements by zoning district. (a) Suburban Estates, SE. (1) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines of nonresidential uses in the SE zoning district, except as provided in FWCC 22-1567 of this article. (b) Single-Family Residential, RS. (1) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines of nonresidential uses in the RS zoning districts, except as. provided in FWCC 22-1567 of this article. (c) Multifamily Residential, RM. (1) Type III landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along all public rights-of-way and ingress/egress easements. (2) Type II landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along the common boundary abutting single-family zoning districts. (3) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section. (d) Professional Office, Po. (1) Type III landscaping eight feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. (2) Type I landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter property lines abutting a residential zoning district except for schools which shall provide 10 feet of Type II. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (d)(1) and (d)(2) of this section. (e) Neighborhood Business, BN. (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all properties abutting public rights-of-way and ingress/egress easements. (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width along all perimeter lot lines except as noted in subsections (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section. (f) Community Business, BC (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all properties abutting public rights-of-way and ingress/egress easements. (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lots lines except as noted in subsections (f)(l) and (f)(2) of this section. (g) Freeway Commercial (1) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of parking areas abutting public rights-of-way. (2) Type I landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zone. . (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted above. 02002 Code Publishing Co. Page 1 EXHIBIT. PAGE.__' I.. . .- .¡¡- 2. (gj Où City Center, Cc. (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of parking areas abutting public rights-of-way. (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines except as noted in subsections (g)(I) and (g)(2) of this section. W ill Office Park, OP; and Corporate Park, CP-I. (l) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. , (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. ' (3) Type III landscàping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (h)(I) and (h)(2) of this subsection. (i) },{anufacturing Park, AfP. (j) Business Park. BP. (1) Type II landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. (2) Type I landscaping 25 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of the property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type II landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of the property abutting a nonresidential zoning district, except MP zones. (4) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines except as noted in subsections (i)(I), (i)(2), arid (i)(3) of this section. (Ord. No. 93-170, § 4, 4-20-93; Ord. No. 96-270, § 3(E), 7-2-96) E'-'X. 'I,"" , ~~).'Il- I ' - .- H;.) i, -- --- PA""'E- Ù, ""F: .4 , J.::.I_---~_.._--) ~ EXHIBrL, PAGE_2 1- ]t=' '& e>2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 2 EXHIBrr_- ,-- Federal Way City CodrAGE~JF-11. Chapter 22, Article XIX, Community Design Guidelines 22-1638 District guidelines. In addition to the foregoing development guidelines, the following supplemental guidelines apply to individual zoning districts: (a) Professional office (PO), neighborhood business (BN), and community business (Be), and freeway commercial (FC). (I) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634( d). (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of- way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right- of-way or pedestrian area. (4) If utilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl- coated mesh and powder-coated poles. For residential uses only: (5) Significant trees shall be retained within a 20-foot perimeter strip around site. (6) Landscaped yards shall be provided between building(s) and public street(s). Parking lots should be beside or behind buildings that front upon streets. (7) Parking lots should be broken up into rows containing no more than 10 adjacent stalls, separated by planting areas. (8) Pedestrian walkways (minimum six feet wide) shall be provided between the interior of the project and the public sidewalk. (9) Lighting fixtures should not exceed 20 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. This shall not apply to public parks and school stadiums. 20' Fi~œ 1(, . SLx:.. 11- l{i~'I <.) (l0) Principal entries to buildings shall be highlighted with plaza or garden areas containing planting, lighting, seating, trellises and other features. Such areas shall be located and designed so windows overlook them. 02002 Code Publishing Co. Page I EXHIB"T- PAGE__-l K ",-' U ~r -1- " E)(¡-f I ßi T--I- PAGEJif'~)F--a Fi¡':"H' 1 . St.'\: 12, 1M, (II) (11) Common recreational spaces shall be located and arranged so that windows overlook them, -----.... - --':I ...-"- --- Ñflltc, II> . ~~ 22. 161R (It) (12) Units on the ground floor (when remitted) shall have private outdoor spaces adjacent to them so those exterior portions of the site are controlled by individual households. ( FI~(~ 19. $.;{. 2, -1(.~ :-) (13) All new buildings, including accessory buildings, such as carports and garages shall appear to have a roof pitch ranging from at least 4:12 to a maximum of 12:12, EXHIB'-~ t-f PAGE - --1 Cf 02002 Code Publishing Co. Page 2 r¡~~ :20 - ~. 22 - :6~8 «I; EXHIBIT__- _l P AGE ,~~ ',:!) ';-= Ca (14) Carports and garages in front yards should be discouraged. (15) The longest dimension of any building facade shall not exceed 120 feet. Buildings on the same site may be connected by covered pedestrian walkways. (16) Buildings should be designed to have a distinct "base", "middle" and "top" The base (typically the first floor) should contain the greatest number of architectural elements such as windows, materials, details, overhangs, cornice lines, and masonry belt courses. The midsection by comparison may be simple. (Note: single-story buildings have no middle.) The top should avoid the appearance of a flat roof and include distinctive roof shapes including but not limited to pitched, vaulted or terraced, etc. Hgtll'\' 2l - s..Y. 22- 1633 (td (17) Residential design features, including but not limited to entry porches, projecting window bays, balconies or decks, individual windows (rather than strip windows), offsets and cascading or stepped roof fonus shall be incorporated into all buildings. Window openings shall have visible trim material or painted detailing that resembles trim. (b) Office park (OP), corporate park (CP), and business park (BP). (I) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). (2) Buildings with ground floor retail sales or services should orient major entrances, display windows and other pedestrian features to the right-of-way to the extent possible. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right- of-way or pedestrian area. (4) If utilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vjnyl- coated mesh and powder-coated poles. For non-single-family residential uses only: (5) Subsections (a)(5) through (A)(17) of this section shall apply. (c) City center core (CC-C) and city center frame (CC-F). (1) The city center core and frame will contain transitional fonus of development with surface parking areas. However, as new development or re-development occurs, the visual 02002 Code Publishing Co. Page 3 EXHIBIT H ---- PAGE___- 3 ' It EXHIBIT__-l dominance of surface pa,king areas shall be reduced. TherefOr~ ~rf'Æ, ~arld! 1;;: ~~ located as follows: a. The parking is located behind the building, with the building located between the right-of-way and the parking areas, or it is located in structured parking; or b. All or some of the parking is located to the side(s) of the building; or c. Some short-tenn parking may be located between the building(s) and the right-of- way, but this shall not consist of more than one double-loaded drive aisle, and pedestrian circulation shall be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). Large retail complexes may not be able to locate parking according to the above guidelines. Therefore, retail complexes of 60,000 square feet of gross floor area or larger may locate surface parking between the building(s) and the right-of-way. However, this fonn of development shall provide for small building(s) along the right-of-way to break up and reduce the visual impact of the parking, and pedestrian circulation must be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). For purposes of this guideline, retail complex means the entire lot or parcel, or series of lots or parcels, on which a development, activity or use is located or will locate. (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of- way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. (3) Building facades that are visible from a right-of-way and subject to modulation per FWCC 22-1635(b), shall incorporate facade treatment as follows: a. The facade incorporates modulation and/or a landscape screening, pursuant to FWCC 22-I635(b); and b. The facade incorporates an arcade, canopy or plaza; and/or one or more articulation element listed in FWCC 22-I635(c)(2); provided, that the resulting building characteristics achieve visual interest and appeal at a pedestrian scale and proximity, contribute to a sense of public space, and reinforce the pedestrian experience. (4) Drive-through facilities and stacking lanes shall not be located along a facade of a building that faces a right-of-way. (5) Above-grade parking structures with a ground level facade visible from a right-of- way shall incorporate any combination of the following elements at the ground level: a. Retail, commercial, or office uses that occupy at least 50 percent of the building's lineal frontage along the right-of-way; or b. A I5-foot-wide strip of Type III landscaping along the base of the facade; or c. A decorative grille or screen that conceals interior parking areas from the right-of- way. (6) Facades of parking structures shall be articulated above the ground level pursuant to FWCC 22-I635(c)(1). (7) When curtain wall glass and steel systems are used to enclose a building, the glazing panels shall be transparent on 50 percent of the ground floor facade fronting a right-of-way or pedestrian area. (8) Chain-link fences shall not be allowed. Barbed or razor wire shall not be used. For non-single-family residential uses only: (9) Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(I7) of this section shall apply. (d) For all residential zones. (I) Non-residential uses. Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(IO) and (a)(13) through (a)(17) of this section shall apply. (2) Non-single-family residential uses. Subsections (aX5) through (a)(l7) of this section shall apply. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) EXHIB\1 PAGE_Lf M Lt 02002 Code Publishing Co. Page 4 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development EXHIBrL- J P AGE~:1 ;~- La.--------- Retail Areas . SeaTac Mall and other regional retailers within the City redevelop/reposition to meet changing consumer demand and become more competitive with other regional retailers. . High-volume retail in Federal Way increases faster than population. . Growth in resident-serving retail occurs in the City Center, existing commercial nodes.. and in redevelopment areas along SR-99. . Neighborhood scale retail development keeps pace with population growth and to an increasing extent, is accommodated within mixed-use buildings in more concentrated neighborhood villages. . Pedestrian-oriented retail development emerges gradually in the redeveloped City Center. . Small amounts of retail use occur on the ground floor of offices, residential buildings, and parking structures. . Neighborhood scale retail development in concentrated neighborhood villages emerges in response to growth in multiple-family concentrations in the I-5/SR-99 corridor and new single-family development on the east side ofI-5. . Old, outdated strip centers along the SR-99 corridor redevelop as a mix of retail, office, and dense residential uses. . The large truck-stop facility at the intersection of Enchanted Parkway and South 348th Street is redeveloped into a retail or mixed-use commercial center. . Freeway oriented commercial development providing for automobile sales, home furnishings centers, hotels and related retail and service uses are located adjacent to 1-5 and SR-18 within areas of appropriate size and with convenient access and visibility. Office Development . Offices of regional, national, and/or international firms locate in West Campus, East Campus, and the City Center. . Garden, high-rise, and mid-rise office space, and modern light-industrial buildings increase rapidly in areas with land assembled for business parks and in redeveloped retail areas. . Office development is integrated with retail, residential, and business parks. EXFt1ß11 PAGE fJ , 1__--- 2003 Camp Plan Updates --N45-- PAGE_.~-- I L "---If.- City of Federal Way PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting , I ",. . "-,- ~,)..¡..., I'-. " March 17, 2004 7:00 p,m. City Hall Council Chambers MEETING MINUTES Commissioners present: John Caulfield. Hope Elder, Dave Osaki, Dini Duc1os, Bill Drake, and Marta Justus Foldi. Commissioners absent: (irant Newport (excused). Alternate Commlssicmers present: Chnstine Nelson Lawson Bronson, and Merle Pfeifer. Alternate CommIssioners absent: Tony Moore (excused). City Council present: Mayor Dean McColgan, Councd Members Eric Faison and Jeanne Burbidge. Staff present: Community Development Services Director Kathy McClung, Community Development Services Deputy Director Greg Fewins, Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Associate Planner Isaac Conlen, Assistant City Attorney Karen Jorgensen, Management Services Director Iwen Wang, Traffic Engineer Rick Perez, Surface Water Manager Paul Bucich, Parks, Recreation, & Cultural Services Director Jennifer Schroder, Parks, Recreation, & Cultural Services Deputy Director Kurt Rueter, Contract Planner Janet Shull, Jones & Stokes Gregg Dohrn, Jones & Stokes Lisa Grueter, and Administrative Assistant E. Tina Piety. Chair Caulfield called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ApPROV AL OF MINUTES It was ill/sic to adopt the March 3, 2004, minutes as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT None. COMMISSION BlJSINESS PUBLIC HEARING - Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Subarea Plan Mr. Dohm delivered a presentation on the background of the P AA. He stated these hearings address: I) the draft PAA Subarea Plan; 2) amendments to that plan (site-specific requests); and 3) the new Freeway Commercial zoning designation. These hearings do not address the annexation process. Ms. Grueter delivered a presentation on the purpose and process of the P AA Subarea Plan. The Commission discussed annexations. The current City Councd policy is to wait to hear from citizens if they have an interest in annexation. Sinee incorporation, the City has annexed three areas; two resulted in a net surplus to the City and one in a net loss, with an altogether net surplus. There would be an increase in taxes to areas that choose to annex to the City because ofthc City's utility tax, but they would gain a higher level of service, It was noted that the P AA Subarea Plan is not a mechanism to annex areas, but designates the future zoning for areas if they choose to annex to the City. K \Plau",ug Commissiou2004\Meet"tg Summ",y ()1.17.04 doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 EXHIBlfarch 1~O4 PAGE___1. ~ PUBLIC HEARING - New Freeway Commercial Zoning Classification Ms. Shull delivered the staff presentation. This new zoning classification is being considered to: provide unique development opportunities along the 1-5 and SRl8 corridors; capture retail markets not currently strongly represented in Federal Way; and capture significant tax revenue. An owner of property in the P AA requested Commercial Business (Be) zoning, but staff felt it was inappropriate. Reasons for this are: Federal Way already has a lot of land designated commercial, adding to these could work against the City's plans for the City Center, and the proposed Freeway Commercial zone has fewer uses. New signage designation is proposed for this new zone. If the Freeway Commercial zone were adopted, goals and policies would have to be added to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Shull noted that the height for pole signs was corrected and changed from 20 to 15 feet. Commissioners expressed concern that this new zone would draw businesses away from Pacific Highway South. Ms. Shull commented that the trend seems to be to have enough land available so a number of different auto dealerships can congregate in an "auto-mall" setting. The Commissioners asked ifthat is really the image we want to have at the entrance to our City. The Commissioners asked if we are lacking in other retail areas, why not pursue them, as opposed to a new zone. The Commissioners asked if the staff has a map with all the parcels in the City that would be eligible for this new zone. The Commissioners want to be sure that this proposed zone would not allow "big-box" retail. The Commissioners would like to know if signs are allocated by parcel or use. P AA Site-Specific Requests Ms. Grueter went over the four site-specific requests. Commissioner Osaki asked that the record reflect that he works for the City of Auburn. Public Testimony was opened. Thor Hoyte - He represents the Davis site-specific request. He also submitted written comments. He feels this request is different from the other site-specific requests because there has been a business on this parcel since 1946. It has been an office use since 1979. The current King County zoning is almost the same as Federal Way's Neighborhood Business (BN) zone. It is his understanding that part of the reason for zoning this residential is the belief that the property would not be able to meet Federal Way BN requirements. He feels the property can meet these requirements. He stated there is no way the current building could be turned into a home (it is only 900 square feet). There is no sewer and the lot is built-out. It is a comer lot, on a road that is not very busy. It has minimal signage, no parking problems, no egress or ingress issues, and no retrofit problems. It will stay as it is for the foreseeable future. Louise Davis - She purchased the property in 1998 and soon ran into legal problems with King County because it was not zoned for a business. It took a lot of time and effort, but the parcel was rezoned and she is now legal. It upsets her that she would again be illegal if the staff recommendation is adopted. Chuck Gibson - He spoke in regards to the Northlake request and represents the owners. Of 56 owners, 44 signed a petition in favor ofRS 9.6, four did not, and eight were not available. The RS 9.6 zone better fits the neighborhood. Alan Ulnyg - He spoke in regards to the Davis request. He has known her for several years and watched her go through the legal hassles. He supports her request. He feels it is better for the community. KIPlanning Commission\2004\Meeting Sununary 03-17-04doclLast printed 4/28/2004 906 AM Planning Commission Minutes March 17, 2004 EXHIBIT -I- Gary Anderson - He spoke in regards to the Davis request. He feels~h~~ent is t!ng ~ -44 her property rights. He feels the land value of her property will go down if it is zoned residential. He knows the City wants to annex them and he doesn't want the City to take her property rights by downzoning D&D Accounting. They are good for the community. She already went through the steps to be legal and now the City wants to change it back. It would close the business, ruin their retirement, and put employees out of work. . Page 3 Christy Field - She asked if it was true that King County wants to have them annex to Federal Way and they have no choice? She has lived here 40 years and does not want to be part of the City. The Commissioners wanted to make it clear that annexation would happen only if some citizens in the area ask the City to be annexed. BJ McMasters - He commented that he has 900 feet on freeway (on Military) and is happy with it. He wants to be in the County, not the City. He has a surface water problem that no one (county or state) has helped him with. Neil Goldingay - He is not impressed with the proposed Freeway Commercial zone. He is open to the idea of annexation. He feels King County has done a good job. He would love to see the City improve Military Road like Pacific Highway South and make it a safer road. He also stated that the intersection of 288th and Military needs work in regards to trash, empty buildings, and vandalism. Lee Rabie - He feels the City is taking the Davis property and his property. This will cost him Yz million dollars. He feels the City staff is mean-spirited and deceitful. King County staff is fairer and has more experts. He stated that the City's permitting process is broken and gave the example of a church. He stated that he would fight if the City attempts to take his property. Norm Ingersoll - He stated that the map of the Rabie property is inaccurate because it shows a road that does not exist. Land is set aside for the road, but currently it is trees and open space. He is not favor of the proposed Freeway Commercial zone or annexation. We should not compete with Auburn, but work with them. Whatever happens, the 320th bridge over 1-5 needs to be fixed. It is too congested. In addition, Military Road needs to be made safer. He feels the mailings on this issue were sporadic and few people knew of this meeting. He knows the City needs more money, but they should not seek more retail, but other kinds of businesses. Rick Reese - He thanked the Commission for listening to the comments. He said that cars make no sense for a bedroom community. He commented that the City should not think in the short- term. He feels the City doesn't follow the mandate of the voters and cited Celebration Park as an example. The City needs to look at the carrying capacity of essential services. Sidewalks, water, etc. need to be in place before the City continues to develop. Michael Tischler - He spoke in regards to the Jackson request. He lives near the proposal. The topography that surrounds those lots is very different from the northeastern side. The proposed new Freeway Commercial zone would be better facing 320th, but not near the single-family lots on the northeast. Moore - She commented that an article in the paper said that annexing these areas would cost more than it is worth. She feels large signs by the highway would distract drivers. K:IPlanning Convnission\2OO4IMeeting Summary 03-17-04.docILast printed 4/28/2004 9:06 AM Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 March 17, 2004 EXHIBIT 2. Lawson Bronson, Alternate Planning Commissioner - Does the staf? A~~mãñY 'Cel~~in -"- the P AA have been rezoned from commercial? He feels the proposed Freeway Commercial zone is a separate issue and asked why are we creating a special classification for One request (Jackson), but not another (Davis)? He feels the P AA study should deal with the financial aspects but not the zoning, until such time an area actually annexes to Federal Way. He feels that this way we are imposing zoning on people who cannot vote for Federal Way Council Members. He asked if this is implemented, what would be the impact on people who want to change their zoning before their area annexes to Federal Way (if it ever does)? Ann Blackwell- She lives near the Davis property. She commented that the traffic is heavy on MiTitary Road. There are times she feels she risks her Tife when pulling out of her driveway. Jackie Moore - She spoke to the impact on the Northlake area. She said it would cost more money to annex and it would come out of our pocket book (property owners). There was no further public testimony. Since the public hearings will be continued, further public testimony will be allowed. Chairman Caulfield read three letters into the record. The Commissioners asked about the way in which policies are stated. Some say, "City shall do this" and others say, "County shall do this," what does this mean? The Commissioners asked who is and is not the governing body of the P AA? They asked that a representative from the County be invited to the next public hearing. They would like to know how many multi-family parcels are developed and undeveloped. They requested that the Freeway Commercial proposal be "tightened"; taking into account the issues raised at this meeting. They would like to know what water body feeds the wetland on the Jackson property and is there any opportunity for off-site mitigation? They would like an aerial photo of the Jackson site and BP A easement in order to gain a feel for how much of the site could be developed. It was m/s/c to continue the public hearings to Wednesday, April 7, 2004, in the City Council Chambers at 7:00 p.rn. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 9:53 p.rn. KIPlanning Conmissionl2004IMeeting Summary 03-17-04.doclLast printed 4/28/2004 906 AM ~ CITY OF ~ Federal Way EXHIBIT- ~- PAGE-J-_,)F 10 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Amendments to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapttr 22 Addition of Freeway Commercial Zone Planning Commission Meeting of April 7, 2004 I. BACKGROUND The proposed code amendment to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, to add a new Freeway Commercial Zone was presented to the Planning Commission at their March 17,2004, public hearing. During this public hearing, some members of the Commission expressed concern about creating a new commercial zone. Some general concerns included a concern that businesses may relocate to this zone from commercial areas along Highway 99; therefore, having a negative affect on the Highway 99 corridor. Another concern was that locating automobile dealerships at the entrances to our community might not be the image that we want to present. One Commissioner was concerned about the effect of commercial development on existing residential neighborhoods. Yet another Commissioner wanted the code to be "tighter" in tenus of protecting neighborhoods while benefiting the City. A list of more specific questions and comments from the Planning Commission followed by staff responses is contained within Section III of this staff report. Section II of this report discusses a change that staff would like to propose in the locational criteria for allowing parcels to be designated Freeway Commercial. II. PROPOSED STAFF CHANGES After the March 17, 2004 Planning Commission public hearing, staff reviewed the proposed locational criteria in Chapter 2, "Land Use," of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit A) and would like to propose the following change shown as striluHHlt and underlined. Freeway Commercial The Freeway Commercial designation is intended for areas that are adjacent to ~ Interstate 5 and SR 1 g interchanges with convenient freeway access and visibility. Freeway Commercial areas are typically large in size (five acres or greater). The range of commercial land uses pennitted in these areas is limited to uses that are difficult to site in the city's other commercially designated areas due to their large site size requirements and/or difficulty in adapting to pedestrian-oriented areas. Freeway Commercial areas are particularly suitable for automobile sales. home furnishings centers. and related retail and service uses that require large tracts of land. convenient freeway access. and visibility. EXH!ßrf_- ~ P AGE -~. ,~) f ----'A-- ¡ The reason for this proposed change is that SR 18 extends to Pacific Highway where it becomes S. 348 Street. If properties in this area were to apply for and be granted a Freeway Commercial zone, there is a potential for 25-foot tall signs to be constructed at grade adjacent to S. 34Sth Street. The maximum height of free stranding signs is presently 12 feet. III. FOLLOW-UP TO QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Questions from and comments by the Planning Commission are shown followed by the staff response: 1. Planning Commission Comment: Locating automobile dealerships at the entrances to our community might not be the image that we want to present. Staff Response: The Planning Commission and Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) will issue a recommendation, with the City Council making the final decision. 2. Planning Commission Comment: The Market Studies identified some retail dollars that were "leaking" to other communities. Why don't we pursue these uses? Staff Response: The Citywide Market Study conducted in 2000, the City Center Market Study conducted in 2002, and the Potential Annexation Area (PM) Subarea Plan and Annexation Feasibility Study completed in 2003 all identify that Federal Way is less competitive in the retail categories of auto sales, furniture, furnishings, and equipment, and to a lesser extent, apparel and accessories. Except for apparel and accessories, the proposed permitted uses in the new Freeway Commercial zone include all of the identified retail uses. 3. Planning Commission Concern: There was a concern that providing a new commercial zoning district with opportunity for designating additional areas commercial, would detract from redevelopment along the Pacific Highway Corridor. Staff Response: The proposed uses to be permitted in a new Freeway Commercial zone was limited to the following due to the need to lessen competition between this new zone and existing commercial districts. Please refer to Table I (Exhibit C) for a comparison of the allowable uses between existing commercial zones and the proposed new Freeway Commercial zone. Proposed pemitted uses in the Freeway Commercial Zone I. Retail selling new vehicles, boats, recreational vehicles, and motorcycles 2. Retail selling household goods and furnishings (floor coverings, draperies, glass, and chinaware) 3. Retail selling household appliances 4. Retail selling home electronics 5. Retail outlet centers 6. Retail providing entertainment, recreational, or cultural services and activities (amusement parks, movie theaters) 7. Golf driving range 8. Hotel Planning Commission Staff Report Addition of Freeway Commercial Zone / File #04-1 00812-00-UP April 7, 2004 Page 2 EXH I B IT __B- PAGE-S- )~-1C.- 9. Public utility (water supply, electric power, telephone, cablevision, natural gas, transportation for persons/freight, commercial broad-cast towers, commercial antennas) 10. Public transit shelter (bus stop) 11. Personal wireless service facilities 4. Planning Commission Question: Do we have a map that shows areas that might qualify for the new Freeway Commercial zoning designation? Staff Response: The new Freeway Commercial zoning designation is intended to apply to property at least five acres in size that is located adjacent to, and visible from, 1-5 and is easily accessible from the freeway interchanges. This zoning designation can be applied to parcels within the P AA as well as in the City. Staff has not prepared a map showing all potential parcels that may be eligible for this zone because that is not the scope of the study. The intent of the Freeway Commercial zoning designation is to provide a new classification, which could be applied for as part of the annual comprehensive plan amendment process, by owners of properties meeting the locational criteria. As part of the P AA Subarea Plan process, property owners within the P AA were given the opportunity to apply for a different pre-annexation and zoning designation. One applicant, Mr. Jackson, has applied for commercial (Community Business) zoning for approximately 23 acres located east ofI-5 and north of South 320th Street. The Planning Commission, as part of the P AA adoption process, is presently considering this request. A traffic study (January 2004 City of Federal Way Planning Technical Report, Rezone Evaluation of Portion of Potential Annexation Area "Camelot" by the Transpo Group) was prepared for the Jackson request. This study showed that increased traffic associated with development of the Jackson site as Freeway Commercial would still meet the City's adopted level of service standards. 5. Planning Commission Question: Will "big box" retail be allowed in the new Freeway Commercial zone? Staff Response: "Big box" retail and bulk retail sales will not be allowed in the Freeway Commercial zone. Only the Community Business zone allows this type of use. Staff has added language shown as underline in the chart for "Retail" in order to exclude "big box" retail (See Exhibit B). 6. Planning Commission Question: How will the Freeway Commercial signs be allotted? Will it be by parcel or use? Staff Response: The proposed code amendment to the sign code allows one Freeway Commercial sign per subject property. This is in addition to signage that is already allowed in the code. Per FWCC Chapter 22, Article I, subject property means the entire lot or parcel, or series of lots or parcels, on which a development, activity, or use is or will locate, or on which any activity or condition regulated by or subject to this chapter is or will occur or take place. Based on this definition, subject property may apply to a single use on a single lot, or to one use on a series of Planning Commission Staff Report Addition of Freeway Commercial Zone I File #04-100812-00-UP April 7, 2004 Page 3 lots. If the Freeway Commercial Zoning Classification and related admendments to FWCC Chapter 22, ArticleXVIII, Signs, are adopted as proposed, signage would be allowed as follows: EXHIBIT_- , PAGE-'f ~~ ~ 10- (a) Building-Mounted Signs - As with all other non-residential zoning districts, the sign area of building-mounted signs in the Freeway Commercial zone would depend on the area of the exposed building face to which it is attached, and the number of building- mounted signs would depend on the surface area of the largest single exposed building face based on a certain formula. (b) Freestanding Signs - The Freeway Commercial zone will be permitted signs pursuant to the Medium Profile category and Highway Profile Category A signs. (c) A maximum amount of four freestanding signs per subject property would be allowed, with a maximum of three freestanding signs per street frontage (two Medium Profile Category and one Highway Profile Category A along the street frontage), including I- S. (d) Signs must have a minimum separation of200 feet. (e) Three of the four signs could have a maximum height of 12 feet (Medium Profile). The fourth sign (Freeway Commercial sign) could be a maximum of 15 feet if the subject property is above the freeway elevation, and 25 feet above the elevation of the freeway ifthe subject property is lower in elevation than the freeway. (f) For single-tenant parcels or separate parcels or pads for single tenant buildings, maximum sign area for three of the four maximum allowable signs is 80 square feet (maximum of 40 square feet per face). For multi-tenant parcels, the maximum sign area for three of the four maximum allowable signs is 128 square feet (maximum of 64 square feet per face). The Freeway Commercial sign could have a maximum sign area of 600 square feet (maximum of 300 square feet per face) if the elevation of the site is below the elevation of the freeway, and 400 square feet (maximum of 200 square feet per face) if the elevation of the site is above the elevation of the freeway. 7. Planning Commission Question: The Planning Commission was concerned about what effect the commercial development of areas that were traditionally residential might have on existing residential neighborhoods. Related to this, the Planning Commission requested that staff "tighten" the standards of the Freeway Commercial zone. Staff Response: The existing proposal already incorporates the following standards if a Freeway Commercial zoned-property is located adjacent to residential zone: (a) Setbacks - There is a proposed setback of 20 feet for all structures, if abutting a residential zone, with a 50-foot setback for New Vehicles sales. (b) Landscape Screening- . Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of parking areas abutting public rights-of-way. Type I landscaping 20 feet in width (emphasis added) shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zone.) . I Per FWCC Chapter 22, Section 22-1565, Type 1 landscaping is a solid screen, which is intended to provide a solid sight barrier to totally separate incompatible uses. This landscaping is typically found between residential and incompatible nonresidential land use zones. Planning Commission Staff Report Addition of Freeway Commercial Zone / File #04-1008 1 2-O0-UP April 7, 2004 Page 4 EXHIBIT_- 3. PAGE-1.)~1Þ , T . Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided al()ng all perimeter lot 'lines, except as noted above. In response to the Planning Commission's concerns, staff recommends that the following language be added to the proposed use zone charts in the Freeway Commercial zone: (a) New Vehicles, Retail, and Entertainment Uses - "The hours of operation may be limited to reduce impacts on nearby residential uses"? (b) The following language, which is presently proposed for the New Vehicles Use Zone Chart is recommended to be further changed as follows3: Public address speakers (P,^. systems) shall not be audible from an adjacent residential zone. The site must be designed so that noise associated with public address systems; vehicle repair or maintenance; and truck parking, loading or maneuvering; will not be audible off the subject property, based on a certificate to this effect, signed by an acoustical engineer and filed with the development pemit application.2 IV. EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 2, Page 11-22 Federal Way City Code, New Retail Use Zone Chart Table I, Uses 1:\2004 Code Arnendments\Freeway Zone\Planning Commission\040704 Revised Staff Report.DOC/03/30/2004 8:50 AM 2A similar note is included in the Use Zone Chart for retail and office uses in the Neighborhood Business zone. 3 This change will be made in the Use Zone Chart if the Planning Commission approves it. Planning Commission Staff Report Addition of Freeway Commercial Zone I File #04-1 00812-00-UP April 7, 2004 Page 5 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use Goal LUG6 Policies LUP38 LUP39 EXHIBIT__. 5. P A.G E-' - - i -:-- 10 Transform Community Business areas into vital, attractive, mixed-use areas that appeal to pedestrians and motorists and enhance the community's image. Encourage transfonnation of Pacific Highway (SR-99) Community Business corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. Encourage auto-oriented large bulk retailers to locate in the South 348th Street Community Business area. Freeway Commercial The Freeway Commercial designation is intended for areas that are adjacent to the Interstate 5 (¡"-€I SR 1 g interchanges with convenient freeway access and visibility. Freeway Commercial areas are typically large in size (five acres or greater). The range of commercial land uses pennitted in these areas is limited to uses that are difficult to site in the city's other commercially designated areas due to their large site size requirements and/or difficulty in adapting to pedestrian-oriented areas. Freeway Commercial areas are particularly suitable for automobile sales. home furnishings centers. and related retail and service uses that require large tracts of land. convenient freeway access and visibility. Goal LUG7 Policies LUP40 LUP41 LUP42 Encourage the development of limited areas with high levels of freeway access and visibility as suitable locations for freeway-oriented businesses to locate within the city in a cohesive development pattern that also meets the community's product and service needs. Encourage freeway oriented uses to locate in Freeway Commercial-designated areas. Encourage quality regional destination retail development through the utilization of appropriate design guidelines and development standards. The development of freeway commercial areas should respond to the needs of consumers by providing for ease of access and circulation and convenient grouping of complementary uses. ~T PAGE_--- \ (.\ 2003 Camp Plan Update \ 11-22 22-XXX Retail. The followin USE Retail establishment selling household goods and furnishings, household appliances and home electronics (excludin!! bulk and bill. hox roaill Retail Outlet centers (excludin!! bulk and bi!! b~x retam <> N ëi3 Õ ,....¡ ;: e ¡.¡., :<= ¡; ~ <> .", ëi3 a <> ~ '- <> 0 ... - ::s iiJü ,) S :tCIJ '" " ¡; 0- "OCIJ <> OJ) .~ .5 g'~ ~¡:>.. USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES I, If any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft. from the property line of the residential zone, 2, If approved through Process !II, the height of that portion ofa structure located 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft, above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 ft., if all of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft, for each one ft, the structure exceeds 35 ft, above average building elevation; and c, An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and . d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. 3. Assembly or manufacture of goods on the subject property is permitted only if: a, The assembly or manufacture is clearly accessory to an allowed use conducted on the subject property and is directly related to and dependent on this allowed use; and b, The assembled or manufactured goods are available for purchase and removal from the subject property and are for sale only to retail purchasers; and c, There are no outward appearance or impacts from the assembly or manufacture, 4. Restaurants, not exceeding 7,500 square feet in gross floor area, are allowed as an accessory use to the outlet center. 5. Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way. 6. Outdoor use, activity, and storage is regulated by Article XIII, Section 1113. 7. No maximum lot coverage is established, Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc, 8. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIx. 9, For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. 10. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII, II. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property, Process II INone 120 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 35 ft. above Retail facilities: See notes 1,2 and average 1 for every 300 Possible I 19 building sq. ft of gross Process elevation floor area III See Note 2 See notes I _11 for each 100 2 sq. ft. of gross floor area for restaurants m X :r: - OJ ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS S2 Minimums 3 ~ Required Yards ;:¡ g t.:) .",ò: '"" <> ¡t ¡:z:: .= <> ::s .- <:r'> <> <> ~~ I Process I, II, ill and IV are described in §§ 22-351-22-356, 1- ¡ 22-361 - 22.370, 22-386 - 22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively.,j 1 " ~ For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. -om »x G):J: ¡" ffi I - . -t T ABLE I USES BN1 BC Above-grade structured parking facilities -.......................-...--...-,.-.........................,....,. Adult entertainment activity, retail or use x M~~ X ---..-...........,.-......................,....,...........-..........,....-...........,..... ......,..,... ......,...... ......-............,.. ......,...... .'...."...................... . ...-...,.................... Bank/savings & loan company - retail providing these & related financial service X X .....--......-.,.........--...--...,..,..............................,...,..,.-....,......,..,.,.....................................,.,..,................,...... ..........,....,.........-.,...,............-....,..,........-.....................-..........................,.,.............,........ ............ ,..,......,.-..,...,..-.......,.....,.......... Brokerage X X . .---,-...,.....,........,....,.,..,..-,-....-.,-.....,...,..............,.......,..-................-,.,.,.,.,.............,...................""."'........."."""""'.""..--""'..."'......"...."......................,..........-...-.....-......,................,.,.,.,..... ..............,.,........-..,.,..............,... Bulk retail sale of lumber, paint, glass; plumbing, electrical and heating fixtures & supplies; bulk X ...Þ..9use-h~~..gQ2..~..~.!...f~~!1..!~h!,1..1.g..~.L!I..!?~....!1.~~~~ry,~!~~Js...(i,!l..~.I.~A~~..::þjg~~~~..:..E~!~~)......... ",-.-.."""""--",,.."."".."""..""..""" .............,..-..........,... Business or vocational school X --....-..............,..-.....-....-............................,.,.. .,................................,....,...................,..,..""."....."...... ......""."'..'...-....-."".""..."........,...,...................,.,..............-..,.-..,...........,....-.................,.......... ......................,.........-...........,...... X X ...-.-.,......................,.....,....................,..........-..............,...................,... .............. .................,..,..................,....,..................,.,.,., ......".....",.""",.."......"....,.."",.-."-.,......,,....+...,...,............-......,.,...-... X X ."'.---"""'-".-"-......"...... ...........,.......................,................,..,................. .............. .........".."."'.......""..""...." ......"......."........................'._""......".".."....'."""......""'...'..'... Convalescent center/nursing home X ,.""",.-"""--"",.-.-,."..."...",..""".",,..................'.'....."'."-..."..'..'..."........"'...". ,.....".,.......-...-."."...",...,."",...... -......-...""..."'-.'-."-'---.."..."'..."......"".."..""'. Convention center/trade center X X ."- Car wash .......,_.....,--._.,.................. Church, synagogue, or other place of religious worship Day care facility, except Class II home occupations ¡-..--..---,-.........,....-......-...-..,--...-................,...,.........,......................-........-.,.....,. .......,.,.. Department store "'--.--,-..,-............,....,.,....,..........,.....................'..."'..""...-...""'."'.'" ..............,..,. ......... ...."........'.... .............. ......,.. ....".".".',.............,. Dwe1\ing unit (Multiple family attached) .. ,."-.""-"".-."-",.",.",.."..,......",,,...,,,..,,..,. Dwel\ing unit (Multiple family stacked) ......................-.....-.........-..............,.,.......-...... Fast food restaurant "-"'-.."".-....-..-............. ........,.....,-...............,...............-...,.......-.............."."'.... ................,.........-....,...........................,...... .......,.... ....................,......-....-............. X X ."........."..'..'..""."'...... X X X ...........,...,L..................,.,..--.........,..... ......-,..,.....--...,.......,...,... X X ....,..."".........,..-.""""-,....""",......."...-".",,.......,... X X (II-A and (II-A and !.!.:!:3.t............,.. ............!.!.:!:32... xix X X ....... Golf course Golf driving range ...,..,-..........,.........................-. Government facility Group home I 1~ 1\' I Health club I Excluding Bulk Retail ... I ... ::::I:~-.'.........."...._._"". ; ........,.,......, j : .......-.............. .1...........................,............1 I.............,.,...".! r=~"'I..."..".""""""---" i I I'" m ~~:+=i~m ~ (IJ..¡ 00:-1--:[. ~ ="~i)=-!--==~ CC-C1 X CC-F1 X X X X X ..............-..,..,... ..-........,.,.............. X X ..,..,..-...-......,.......................,......... X X ............--...-..................,......................... X X ....,............,........,. ............................... X i X .......................-.. .... ..................... X X .................,......,....,...,..,.,..................... X X X X X X X X X i. t FC X X ........-........---,-- ~ 0 -om :Þx G):t: .m ffi - \}J ..-4 () , ~\ x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ................... Public transit shelter (bus stop) ..--,-,--.,..-.--..---.............. ....,...,........ ."" ......... - ....,-..--....,.......,.....,....... .... .....................................",.."",..""",.."..." ,,-, """"",.."-,....'""""".."",_..""""",,,"",..."."""""""""."..", """ ,+-"",., Public utility (water supply, electric power, telephone, cablevision, natural gas, transportation for ,....P..~ rs 0 n sl i~~..\g~,!!..~g,~,!!1 e rc,i,~,!,..PE~~~:,~,~~!,!?~~E~!,,£o ml11 e ~~.i.~,I,.~~!~~~~~).."......"..", ",....",.., ......",....".. Recreational vehicle parking lot (temporary) -,..-....,-....-,..-,.....................................' Restaurant or tavern m.."...""" ....".... _..m_'..". ..'m........'m..'_""-""""""""""""'.' USES Hospital ---..-..-,..._..........m.........._.........m.....""""" Hotel ...--,--.... ...._..'....m""""_""-'--""-"" Merchandise and equipment rental facilities (excluding heavy equipment rental) ....".... .............".... ",.......,..,..,--..-,...-__........m..........'" Mini-warehouse or public storage facility ....--,..-,-...., Motel ....-,-..............m....m.._"""""-"'-"""""'" .......................,..,_.............",..m..........' ....",....-.._."......m..,_...,..."........m...."............m.."-"""'-""""""".._"m," Office use (medical, dental, health care, veterinary, accounting, legal, architectural, engineering, consulting, management, administrative, secretarial, marketing, advertising, personnel, sales offices ,~~ e ~ ~ ii-¿~!~~~~? å~ [ÿ°e¥l1 ~~~h~¡'111 ì '~~~Jå1irrti.¿~~~id ¥Ì~cThåf rif~i~~~%~%~~'6~ õiq~~'í%~~~:~ ål, ..J..I:!!:!1.~f(;:,r..f!!:çi1J!!(;:~",...."..""",.."",.."",..~m....'m""m"".."..m,""""" Personal wireless service facility """-"--,,,,,,"""-""-"""" ""..""".................... Pistol range (Indoor) Private lodge or club ",...... ..m.... --....,....,..,............, ........................,-"""" ........' ,.",......-........"""'" Public park m.."m......mm""""'" ....mm ".""" ......m.." m""", --,"""""-"-""-"---"""""""""-"""" ....m.. ....,... Retail selling groceries; produce and related items -,............m'..'....."',,"""""-"""-""""""" .."m.."'" """........., Retail selling drugs and personal care products --..............,..,-.... Retail selling books Retail selling liquor ___.._m.._.............'......"m Retail selling hardware Retail selling garden, nursery stock and related items --,-..-....,.......,-......_'..m...."'--""""""""'" ,......,..,.. ............., Retail selling household goods and furnishing Retail selling household appliances -........--..-..-....,...,-,..,-,-,-"""""""" m.....,'" ...........,........_'.._....m.."""" ......"".... mm...................m..,..,"""'.""""""'" Retail sale of grain, seed, fencing, hay, nursery stock and other agricultural supplies - 2- CC-F1 BN1 BC X X X I ....t"'m i ..t I 1m I , I ml l ml......m" X "I"""'X" I.. I x "..".... ...._"" x x x x ...-"'" x x x """""""""""""""j" x x x x x x x x x ........",..,.. x X ,..,_......"..m_,...,." X X ...,....,....,......",....."""""'" X X X x x l 1m 1m I 1m ..Jm x x x x x m..m1 FC I -mm"1 :::"::~",,'::::':] I ! m..-m"""1 ......-j I I I "'-¡ I i ! j I "j i I ; """1 I I ....., ; i ..1 I 'x""""""'¡ -....m....,.! I mmì ,,_m,," "'-1 ".._,\ I ""'.-""""--"""""""""-1 x x ; ml" ..,1"" I -t..- ~ +..-...,-..--..,- .. :r: .1 - .m' I"T"I \"'" '" VJ , """"""""-'-1 ,......... I..,....,..""""",.."",mm ..,- I x...:.'~..' ..,m..........,',.". 7 . . r x ' L=-- "' t I ,,""" , '..m"'.. l ..0 ""CJm »x G>:r moo ì - W ---I I I " Vv X ---..'-..'.'-..."."-.-1.--.. X X X X X ._.."""--".._--_._'_.'_._'._......'..I_~=x-_--"-p;......-x ."'.."'~:~-~:-_._-X' x x x x x X .---'...'.-.-.----,---.-.....-......1-,-.-- ,-_. -.-'..""..-.-..-....1...-...-.--- X X X X --.----.....--..--.-,......--.---.---,.,.--.-.-..-..-.-. USES -..----..'."".....---...-.'..--'-"'---'.-....--.-..--.'-...'-.-----.... Retail selling clothing -.---.....-......---.-..........,.....---.-..-..-..-.,. Retail selling variety items .-'-'.'-'....--.....-'---....-.."...'...--'.--.'-'-""--._m.._. Retail selling specialty items ........ ......-...,......,......,.... .......--..-....,-......,--.....-...-.....,.................--..-..-....,-----. Retail selling home electronics .-........---....,.,.,.-.....-.-----,.,....-.-..-.-......,.........,..,...-----.....,-...--..-- Retail selling sporting goods ...""",--....-......-....."-,..".--...,.",.---,,...-........--.-..-..-.--...- Retail selling works of art ,........,.....-.--.......-..........-.........-.....--,-..-,.,.........,......-.-...-..-...--......--- Retail outlet centers ....'-'...---..,..,.-...-.----...--. Retail providing laundry, dry cleaning, beauty/barber, video rental or shoe rep -,.. Retail providing entertainment, recreational, or cultural services and activities -."'. .._,-.. Retail providing printing & duplicating services "-----.----.-- Retail providing vehicle service or repair -----,.... Retail providing vehicle, boat or tire sales, service, repair and/or painting .. Retail selling new vehicles. boats. recreational vehicles and motorcycles J{et~1I providing limIted medlc.al~ manufacturing services sucK as dentanabs, pI servlces~ on a._~~kcase basls___........., ....,.-.---..-..--.-.. School (through secondary education) ---...---,--.-...--,.- Senior citizen or special needs housing .'--..-...----,...-...-,.,-........-,-------.- Social service transitional housing '...--...-.-.-....-.....-..,.,--..-..--.--,----.-- -..--.....-,....--...-.-....-...,.,. Trade school .-.-.--"'-"'.-....-...-- - --....--.. .---'-....-.-__...'m.'......-...-..-.---,.-.--...-- Vehicle service station '-'..-.-..-......-.-'.......-...-'..."."..'.....---....-...........,..........,....--.,...-.---...........-.,.....,.._,..... ,.....---,--..-,...,..--..........-.. -..'..'------.----.-,.--- BNI .---...---.-,--.---,.,--, --_..._.-_--l__._~- X -.--...-.------.-.-,.--. '--...--.--.--.--.-,----- -.-.,--.----,--- r services x X .'--. -.'..-"'.-.--.----.--...-.-.-. BC cc-cl CC-F1 FC --~._.__._._,--,._-.__._-,._..-....----- ..._..,..,.__.,..,._---,-,-,.... -...-.....---...,.-.-.-,.--.-- X ttH" X X ---"1- . X_,.,.,..._--~ _...,.~- _m__.___---,.--......- X X X (Type A o.!:.!D- X X X X X --.---.- X X (Type A or ~_.,- -----.,-...-- ----..,....- X X I I X , . ._,--.., -1----- X ! osHïetlcs, labs, OPtlCal+-.-..---..---i -, X X -'--- -,...,-..---....-..- X (Type A or B -.-..--.....----.-.--.,-..---,.. X --.-......-,......--.--.-.-,.-. ,...........~..._,.,..__..,._-~--_.._,.....,_.........- ..- ...,..----,...-..... .-..-..--..... ...--..... _m...' () 1:\2004 Code Amendments\Freeway Zone\Planning Commission\021004 Comparison Use Chart.doc/03/30/2004 9:05 AM - 3 - .-- '-...r-.,....-.--..---.,---.-...--,...,.-.,,-..-.--- x m >< :r: - OJ F;:¡ 0 ~ I , City of Federal Way PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting EXHlb.,Wft PAGE I 'f= 5~~ April 7, 2004 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers MEETING MINUTES ComnllSsioners present: John Caulfield. Hope Elder, Dave Osaki, Dini Duclos, and Grant Newport. CommIssIoners absent: Marta Justus Foldl and Bill Drake (excused). Alternate CommIssioners present: Chnstllle Nelson Lawson Bronson, Tony Moore. and Merle PfeIfer. Alternate CommIssioners absent: Nonc. CIty Council present: Council Members L~ric Faison and Jeanne Burbidge. Staff present: Community Development ServIces Director Kathy McClung, Community Development Services Deputy Director Greg Fewms, Associate Planner Isaac Conlen, Assistant City Attorney Karen Jorgensen, Management Services Director Iwen Wang, Traffic Engineer Rick Perez, Contract Planner Janet Shull, Jones & Stokes Gregg Dohrn, Jones & Stokes Lisa Grueter, and Administrative Assistant E. Tina Piety. Chair Caulfield called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ApPROV AL OF MINUTES It was m/slc to adopt the March 17,2004, minutes as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Ms. Wang delivered a presentation on the City of Federal Way 2005 - 2006 Biennial Budget. She noted that whlle the City's tax burden is $63 higher than King County's, the City provides more services, and a tax break for low-income senior citizens is available. COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING - Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Subarea Plan Mr. Conlen went over the staffs responses to the Commission's and public's questions from the last meeting. The Commission questioned where access would be for the Jackson request. Mr. Perez responded that the primary access would probably be from 3211d Avenue South. The Washington Department of Transportation would have to approve any access to/from 320tl1 Street and if they allowed any access, it most likely would be right-in/right-out only. Mr. Dohrn addressed the King County policies question raised at the last meeting. He stated that the staff had spoken to King County about providing a representative for this meeting, but negotiations fell through. One concern King County has about providing a representative is that they are working with the City Manager's otTice on this issue and want to be sure no miscommunication occurs. King County will not adopt the City's P AA Subarea Plan, but would view it, and the policies contained therein, as advisory. If K ,Plannmg Commrs"on\2004\Meetmg Summary 04.07-04 doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 April 7, 2004 the City feels strongly about any of the policies, they can enter into neg~¡[PtJ:g County t~ encourage King County to adopt said policies. P AG E -- ~ ". ,.-: ~ PUBLIC HEARING - New Freeway Commercial Zoning Classification Ms. Shull went over the staffs responses to the Commission's questions and comments from the last meeting. The staff had removed SR 18 from the recommendation and the Commission asked if staff had considered including SR 18 east oft-5. Michael Tischler - He showed a PowerPoint presentation of the area with aerial and ground photos of the single-family homes on 32nd and 3 16th. He commented that the last report said one of the goals of the change is to make adjacent parcels more alike. He feels his presentation shows the change will actually make adjacent parcels more different. Del Carlino - He lives on Lake Doloff and asked if the City was planning to annex the area. The Commission explained that this process only adopts future comprehensive plan zoning designations for the area that would take effect only if citizens in the area request that they be annexed to the City. Roy Ruffino - He spoke on the Jackson request. He stated it seems to be an adversarial issue and most neighbors are against it. He commented that off-site mitigation would not do any good in this area. He requested the City consider future relations with neighbors in the area when making their decision. Karen Bush - She stated her opposition to the Jackson request. James Awarado - He stated his opposition to the Jackson request. He commented it would decrease the quality of life in the area. There would be more traffic and more lights at night. Steve McNey - He is with All American Homes and represents the Jackson request. He commented that the Freeway Commercial zone is a compromise for them. They did not request this zoning from the City; rather they want Community Business (Be) so they can build a grocery store. A grocery store would decrease the traffic traveling west on 320th. A grocery store in this area would also capture traffic going to Auburn. They want to do a development that would be good for the neighborhood and the City. He stated they have been negotiating with King County and the County supports the BC zoning. He stated they have spoken with car dealerships and the dealerships say the sign code would be a deterrent. They have heard from grocery chains wanting to locate in the area. He commented that this side of 32nd would not make good residential property. One reason is because of the freeway noise. Gary Anderson - He stated his opposition to the Jackson request. He said that due to Mr. McNey's comments, most of what he had to say has gone out the window. He commented that he wants to keep auto dealerships out of the area. He lives only 60 feet away from the Jackson property. Planning philosophy denotes a gradual change from one use to another. This would be a sharp change. It would reduce the value of the homes in the area. He gave the Commission a petition signed by 52 people opposed to the zoning change. Itwould impact more than just his neighborhood. It would make traffic on 320th much worse. He feels it is not right that representatives that people in the neighborhood cannot vote for are making this decision. Louise Davis - She is the applicant for the Davis request. She asked ifthere are any other properties comparable to hers (staff replied the Sutherland Grocery and Gas property is similar, but it is abandoned). She challenged the Commission to consider that property; it hasn't operated KIPlanning Commissionl2OO4IMeeting Summary 04-07-04.doclLast printed 4/28/2004 906 AM Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 April 7, 2004 EXHIBfT 'i in years while hers is a thriving business. She spent a lot of money to l!Ie(~er pro!ry ff:" ~ commercial with King County and does not want to do again for the cJi()I1\~~11Ot"bè '. possible for this to be a residential lot. Bryan Cope - He spoke on the Jackson request. He lives nearby. The City should keep businesses together and not place them out here. An auto mall should go along Pacific Highway near the other auto dealerships. There is no visibility of the property from 1-5 from the south and it would be a distraction from the north. Freeway Commercial zoning would change the City's "curb appeaL" The City should work with SeaTac Mall to get more businesses to locate at the malL Because of the wetlands, developing the Jackson property would be more trouble than it is worth. There is already a lot of noise in the neighborhood due to 1-5 and this would increase the nOIse. Lois Kutscha - She spoke in favor of the Northlake request. She wants to see the zoning changed from six to four houses per acre. Carla Laslella - She spoke on the Jackson request. She had figured it would be office park, like other properties in the area. She is concerned for the children in the area who ride their bikes along 32nd and 3 16th. She is concerned auto dealerships would bring in transients who have no feeling for the community. She feels access to the site would make more sense if it were from the freeway as opposed to 32nd. Steve Charles - He spoke on the Davis request. As a small business owner, he knows the Davis's look upon this business as their retirement and it would be very detrimental to them to lose it. He commented that the building would not work as a home. Because 30Sth Place is in the wrong place, according to the title insurance, the property is in the road. Because of this when they remolded, they had to change the setback on the second floor. There is only one bathroom and no place to put a second. There is no place a garage could go. The current building would have to be demolished in order to have a residential use on the property. Pam Ditzhazy - She spoke in opposition to the Jackson request. She lives on the corner of 32nd and 316th. She is concerned about the noise and light auto dealerships would bring. She is also concerned about the safety of the children and the increased traffic. Lawson Bronson, Alternate Planning Commissioner - If the Jackson applicant does not want Freeway Commercial, what other uses would be good for this area? Since they don't want it, why pursue the Freeway Commercial zoning? The City needs to communicate more clearly about the P AA issue because miscommunication has caused unneeded stress. The Commissioners commented that the P AA Subarea Plan has been in the works for 1 Yz to 2 years. Numerous public meetings have been held that have been mailed to various citizens and agencies within the P AA, and advertised in the paper and on the City's TV ChanneL Doug Parter - He spoke on the Davis request. He commented that community members do not have the ability to fight policy and that is what this is about. Val Caulder - He spoke in opposition of the Jackson request. A through street to 320th would increase traffic on 316th because people would use it to avoid the intersection of 320th and Military. It would be a faster way to 1-5. Currently they ride horses on 316th and would no longer be able to do that. KIPlanning Convnissionl20041Mecting Summary 04-07-04doc1Last printed 412812004 9:06 AM Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 April 7, 2004 4- Lisa Fritz- She spoke in opposition of the Jackson request. Thet;8fã~š-ñëìg~rh~~~ currently wonderful to walk along, but this would increase the traffic and they would no longer be safe. EXHIBCf: The Commission discussed the site-specific requests. The Commission would like to know King County's plans for zoning on the Jackson property and clarity on the access for the Jackson property. They would like to know the uses allowed by the concomitant agreement for property to the east of the Jackson request. They would like to know what properties could be zoned Freeway Commercial. The Commission would like to know why the Sutherland Grocery and Gas property is identified as a cultural resource. It was m/s/c to continue the Public Hearings to Wednesday, April 21, 2004, in the City Council Chambers at 7 :00 p.m. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. K:\Planning Commission\2004\Meeting Summary 04-07-04.doclLast printed 4/28/2004 906 AM ~ CITY OF ~ Federal Way EXHIBIT_S PA.G.,c. ....1. 'H=.3 .' t~, . --- ---.--' - MEMORANDUM April 14,2004 To: John Caulfield, Chair, City of Federal Way Planning Commission FROM: Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner Janet Shull, Contract Planner SUBJECT: Follow-up Responses to April 7, 2004, Planning Commission Comments on the Proposed Freeway Commercial Zone MEETING DATE: Apri121,2004 I. BACKGROUND The proposed code amendment to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, to add a new Freeway Commercial Zone was presented to the Planning Commission at their March 17,2004, and April 7, 2004, public hearings. During the March 17,2004, public hearing, some members of the Commission had concerns and comments, which staff addressed in a follow-up memorandum. This memorandum was presented to the Planning Commission at their April th meeting. At that meeting, the Planning Commission had two additional questions, which staff has addressed in the following section. II. FOLLOW-UP TO QUESTIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Questions from the Planning Commission are shown followed by the staff response: 1. Planning Commission Question: Can the Freeway Commercial zoning designation also be applied to areas along SR IS east ofI-5? . Staff Response: After the March 17,2004, Planning Commission public hearing, staff had reviewed the proposed 10cational criteria for the Freeway Commercial zone and recommended that this designation only be applicable to areas five acres or greater that are adjacent to the Interstate 5 (1-5) interchanges with convenient freeway access and visibility. This was a change from the initial recommendation, which had also included SR-18. Staff recommended not including SR-lS because SR IS extends to Pacific Highway where it becomes South 34Sth Street. If properties in this area were to apply for and be granted a Freeway Commercial zone, there is a potential for 25-foot tall signs to be constructed at grade adjacent to South 34Sth Street. The maximum allowable height of free stranding signs in that area is presently 12 feet. EXH!BIT_-5 PA(~E,_~ r~)E 3 However, after further study of how the locational criteria could relate to SR 18, staff recommends that only those areas five acres or greater in size that border the 1-5/South 320ll1 and I-5/SR 18 interchanges with convenient freeway access and visibility should be eligible for the Freeway Commercial comprehensive plan and zoning designation. In order to accomplish this, staff recommends the following changes in the proposed 10cational criteria in Chapter 2, "Land Use," of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Proposed changes discussed in this memorandum are shown as 8tril~e€nit and underlined. Freeway Commercial The Freeway Commercial designation is intended for areas that are aàiaeent to Interstate 5 aft€Ì SR 18 border the I-5/South 320th and 1-5/SR 18 interchanges with convenient freeway access and visibility. Freeway Commercial areas are typically large in size (five acres or greater). The range of commercial land uses pennitted in these areas is limited to uses that are difficult to site in the city's other commercially designated areas due to their large site size requirements and/or difficulty in adapting to pedestrian-oriented areas. Freeway Commercial areas are particularly suitable for automobile sales, home furnishings centers, and related retail and service uses that require large tracts of land, convenient freeway access, and visibility. This recommendation is based on the following reasons: (a) There are three 1-5 interchanges that serve the City of Federal Way. These are located at South 272nd Street and 1-5, South 320th Street and 1-5, and South 348111 Street and 1-5. Mark Twain Elementary School and multi-family development is located on property bordering the southwestern portion of the I-5/South 272nd interchange, which is located within the City of Federal Way, and a church borders the southeastern portion of the 1-5/South 272nd interchange, which is located within the Potential Annexation Area (P AA). The northeastern and northwestern portions of the South 272nd/I-5 interchange is located within the Cities of Des Moines and Kent, respectively. Freeway Commercial zoning would not be appropriate for those properties bordering either the southwestem or southeastern portions of the 1-5/South 272nd interchange. Therefore, only the I 5/South 320th and 1-5/SR 18 interchanges are proposed as potential locations for Freeway Commercial zoning. (b) Freeway Commercial zoning could not be applied to properties west of 16th A venue South along SR 18 if eligible property was required to border rather than be adjacent to the 1- 5/SR-18 interchange. This is because the dictionary defines "adjacent" as being next to or nearby whereas it defines "border" as having a common boundary. (c) Areas north of SR-18 that may be eligible for this designation are presently under the Weyerhaeuser Company control, and are for the most part developed as office. In addition, these properties are zoned Corporate Park (CP-1) pursuant to a development agreement which has been crafted for uses and standards unique to this property. Uses in this area are not expected to change in the near future. Planning Commission Memorandum Follow-Up to Freeway Commercial Zone April 14,2004 Page 2 EXHIBiT__- _S PA.GE ---~ ,- ~ (d) Areas to the south of SR 18 that meet this requirement are presently in the P AA and arc zoned single family (R-4, four units per acre) under King County and are proposed to be given a pre-annexation Federal Way zoning designation of single family (RS 9.6, one unit per 9,600 square feet). One other potential candidate for Freeway Commercial zoning is located to the east of this single family zoned area. This property is also under Weyerhaeuser control and is zoned for Office Park (OP-l) pursuant to a development agreement. 2. Planning Commission Question: Do we have a map that shows areas that might qualify for the new Freeway Commercial zoning designation? Staff Response: (a) The new Freeway Commercial zoning designation is intended to apply to property at least five acres in size that borders, is visible from, and is easily accessible from the 1-5/South 320th and I-5/SR 18 freeway interchanges. (b) This zoning designation can be applied to parcels within the P AA as well as in the City. (c) Like any other site-specific comprehensive plan amendment and rezone request, the Freeway Commercial designation could be applied for as part ofthe annual comprehensive plan amendment process. Staff has not prepared a map showing all potential parcels that may be eligible for this zone because this may set up an expectation on the part of owners that these properties shall be given this designation upon request. Like any other request, these requests would be subject to the comprehensive plan amendment process, which includes a Selection Process by the City Council, a Public Hearing by the Planning Commission, and a decision by the City Council. 1:\DOCUMENT\Freeway Commercial Zoning District\Planning Commission\042 104 Staff Report.doc/04115/2004 1 :00 PM Planning Commission Memorandum Follow-Up to Freeway Commercial Zone April 14,2004 Page 3 City of Federal Way PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting t\GE ,- '- I ,.-:-'!I ._-_..,-j;~ , , '.. ._..,.,,~_. April 21, 2004 7:00 p.m City Council Chambers MEETING MINUTES Commissioners present: John Caulfield, Hope Elder, Dave Osaki, Dini Duclos, Bill Drake, and Grant Newport. Commissioners absent: Marta Justus Foldi (excused). Altemate Commissioners present: Lawson Bronson, Tony Moore, and Mer]e PfeIfer. Alternate Commissioners absent: Chnstine Nelson (unexcused). City Council present: Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar and Council Member Jeanne Burbidge. Staff present: Community Development Services Director Kathy McClung, Community Development Services Deputy Director Greg Fewins, Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Associate Planner Isaac Con len, Assistant City Attomey Karen Jorgensen, Traffic Engineer Rick Perez, Contract Planner Janet Shull. Jones & Stokes Lisa Grueter, and Administrative Assistant E. Tina Piety. Chair Caulfield called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m ApPROV AL OF MINUTES It was m/s/c to adopt the April 7, 2004, minutes as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADMINISTRATIVE REpORT None COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING - Potential Annexation Area (P AA) Subarea Plan Mr. Conlen delivered a presentation on questions raised at the last public hearing. It was stated that a development agreement is an option for the Rabie property. PUBLIC HEARING - New Freeway Commercial Zoning CIassifìcation Ms. Shull delivered a presentation on questions raised at the last public hearing. Because the Commission wanted to know what parcels this proposed zoning could be applied to, she showed a map of the current zoning in the areas considered for this proposed zoning classification. Ms. Shull commented that if this zoning classification is approved, any owner wishing to apply this proposed zone to their property would have to go through the City's Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. PUBLIC HEARING - 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Quadrant Site-Specific Request Ms. Clark delivered the staff report. Commissioner Newport recused himself from the Quadrant site- specific request. This IS a request to delete a proposed road from the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). The road in question is an extension of Weyerhaeuser Way. The City Council required the K IPlanning Comm<ss;onI2004IMeelmg Summa,y 04-2 I -04 doc Planning CoITInÚssion Minutes Page 2 EXHIBIT April 2'1, 2004 applicant to prepare a traffic study analyzing the effects of deleting thiRAGE:he..Apr~~fJ . plan. The study concluded that no roadway improvements would be needed by 2020 as a result of the proposed action. Due to this proposal, Mr. Perez asked the Commission to consider amending the comprehensive plan to make 32"d Avenue South a principal collector from South 320111 Street to approximately South 316th Street. The meeting was opened to public testimony. Commissioner Duclos infonned the Commission that she had spoken to Steve McNey and encouraged him to bring his comments to this public hearing. Wally Costello - Applicant for the Quadrant request. He explained their proposal for the parcels the road would pass through and showed how the road would be detrimental to the proposed project. There are wetlands on the property that will restrict development and a road would restrict it further. Joanne Kirkland - She spoke in opposition of the Jackson request. She stated that the map in the staff report shows 312111 as a through street (from 32"d to Military), but it is not. The report also says that a grocery store would decrease the amount of traffic in the area, but how could adding retail decrease the amount of traffic? She also commented that she recently learned that the P AA process has been going on for some two years, but this is the first she has heard about it. She is concerned that annexation would raise taxes and services would go down. This is a safe area for children and she is concerned that will change. Chainnan Caulfield asked if King County mailed a notification of the P AA Subarea Plan to those within the P AA? Ms. Grueter replied that the issue was on the King County website, but for the most part, the City of Federal Way mailed the notifications. A notification had been sent in the utility mailings. Charles Gibson - He spoke his support of the Northlake request and said he was available if the Commission had any questions. Cindy Cope - She spoke in opposition of the Jackson request. She feels there is no need to bring more retail into the area. There is a lot of available retail space in Federal Way, such as the vacant theater and empty spaces in the Mall and Ross Plaza and SeaTac Village, etc. This area is a very private neighborhood that is safe for children to ride their bikes. Opening 32"d would bring more traffic, which would make it more dangerous for children to ride their bikes and would bring in more crime. Steve McNey - He is the Jackson property manager. They want Community Business (Be) zoning because they feel they can best serve the neighborhood and the City with that zoning. They are not trying to compete with the downtown core. A grocery store in this area would decrease traffic on 3201h, would proved a tax base to the City, and would provide a service to the neighborhood. They have submitted a docket to King County asking for a zoning change to commercial business. Kristen Wynne - She spoke in opposition of the Jackson request. She feels the proposed Freeway Commercial zone is not compatible with existing uses. If a car dealership were to go into the area, it would mean more lights and noise. She commented that 320111 is already a disaster area on the weekends. A more intense traffic study should be done before a decision is made. In addition, in terms of aesthetics, a car dealership at the entrance to Federal Way is a step in the wrong direction. K:\Planning Commissionl2004\Meeting Summary 04.21.04 doc Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 EXH!BIT~priI21,2004 -'- P A G E __I,) ~---L- Public testimony was closed. It was m/s/c (unanimous) to recommend adoption of the Neighborhood Business comprehensive plan designation and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning for the Davis P AA site-specific request. It was m/s/c (unanimous) to recommend adoption of the Single Family, High Density comprehensive plan designation and Single Family 9.6 zoning for the Northlake P AA site-specific request. The Commission discussed how the owner of the Rabie P AA sit -specific request could utilize a development agreement. Mr. Fewins informed the Commission that annexation ofthis area is not anticipated in the near future and the owner plans to develop soon. It was m/s/f(one yes, four no, one abstain) to recommend adoption of the Neighborhood Business comprehensive plan designation and Neighborhood Business (BN) zoning for the Rabie P AA site-specific request. The Commission expressed concern over downzoning the property. It was m/s/f(three yes, three no) to recommend adoption of the Single Family, High Density comprehensive plan designation and Single Family 7.2 zoning for the Rabie P AA site-specific request; with the stipulation that the Planning Commission feels strongly that a self- storage/mini-storage use would be an acceptable use on this site. After further discussion, it was concluded that the Rabie P AA site-specific request would go forward with no Planning Commission recommendation. It was m/s/f(one yes, five no) to recommend adoption of the Community Business comprehensive plan designation and Community Business (BC) zoning for the Jackson P AA site-specific request. It was m/s/c (four yes, two no) to recommend adoption of the Office Park comprehensive plan designation and Office Park (OP) zoning to the south part of the Jackson P AA site-specific request, and Single Family High Density comprehensive plan designation and Single Family RS 9.6 zoning to the north part of the Jackson P AA site-specific request. It was m/s/c (five yes, one no) to recommend adoption of the staffrecommendation for the New Freeway Commercial Zoning Classification. It was m/s/c (unanimous) to recommend adoption, with the aforementioned changes, of the staff recommendation for the PAA Subarea Plan. It was m/s/c (four yes, one no, one excused) to recommended adoption of the staff recommendation for the Quadrant site-specific request with the amendment that 32nd Avenue South, from South 320th Street to approximately South 316th Street, would be reclassified from a minor to a principal collector, it would use Cross Section "0," Map III- 6 would be modified to reflect this, and 32nd A venue South from South 320th Street to approximately South 316th Street would replace Weyerhaeuser Way as Map ID #35 on Table III-19. The Public Hearings were closed at 8:55. These items will be scheduled for the May 3,2004, City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee, which will meet at 5:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. KIPlanning Commission\2004lMeeting Summary 04.21-04 doc FWCP - Chapter Two, land Use EXHIBIT- PAGE_- , Figure II-2 The Concept Plan Diagram Concentrate new development in die Highway 99/1-5 coc-ridoe. Devdop infrastnlctu.-e to support' coc-ridOC' dcvetopment. Transfonn retúa <:ore into a new mi.xed-use GtyCenter. Preserve and enhance existing single- family neighbomoôds. Create. a hetw<kk of parks and open '--("'1'-"0<>- Diversify employment base by creating distinct II:mptoyment areas '~.. _.. Create new intensive residential . communities supported by transit. Provide community Olnd com'merciaJ services t.O residential comm~mities. 1 7 \ 2003 Comp Plan Update 11.3 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use EXHIBIT_____1 P A G E ----2,'J F -' RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE CHAPTERS 2.2 The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all FWCP chapters. Internal consistency among the chapters of the FWCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient use of limited resources. Below is a brief discussion of how the Land Use chapter relates to the other chapters ofthe FWCP. Economic Development Federal Way's economy is disproportionately divided. Based on PSRC's 2000 Covered Estimates by jurisdiction~ retail and service industries compose more than 70 percent of Federal Way's employment base. Covered estimates are jobs that are covered by unemployment insurance. Dependence on retail trade stems primarily from the City's evolution into a regional shopping destination for South King County and northeast Pierce County. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Tukwila and the Auburn SuperMall, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To improve Federal Way's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy. A diversified economy should achieve a better balance between jobs and housing and supports the City's quality of life. In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the following: . A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing. . Community Business and Business Park development in the South 348th Street area. . Continued development of West Campus. . Continued development of East Campus (Weyerhaeuser Corporate and Office Park properties). . Redevelopment and development of the SR-99 corridor into an area of quality commercial and mixed use development. . Continued use of design standards for non-singleJamily areas. . Freeway commercial development focusing on attracting and capturing those retail dollars presently being lost to other communities and complementing existing retail uses in the community. 2003 Camp Plan Update 11-4 FWCP - Chapter Two, Land Use EXH I BIT __n-1 PAGr_3~)F~ The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see the Comprehensive Plan Designations Map II-I). A complete discussion of economic development is set forth in the Economic Development chapter. Capital Facilities Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, parks and open space, and surface water management. Infrastructure and Urban Services The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities and the maintenance of existing facilities. As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be financed by voter-approved bonds, impact fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), and money from the City's general fund. To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements. Water Availability Based on reports from the Lakehaven Utility District, the estimated available yield from the underlying aquifers is 10.1 million gallons per day (MGD, 10-year average based on average annual rainfall). The District controls which well to use, thus which aquifers are being pumped from, based on a number of considerations including water levels and rainfall. In order to reduce detrimental impacts to its groundwater supplies in the recent past, the District has also augmented its groundwater supplies with wholesale water purchased from the City of Tacoma through water system interties. In addition, the District has entered into a long-term agreement with the City of Tacoma and other South King County utilities to participate in the construction of Tacoma's Second Supply Project (a second water diversion from the Green River), which will provide additional water supplies to the region. As a result, the water levels in the aquifers have remained stable, and the District's water supply capacity will increase to 14.7 MGD on an annual average basis when Tacoma's Second Supply Project is completed in 2004. Concentrating growth, along with conservation measures, should help to conserve water. Water Quality Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City. Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water; and, continued health of the City's streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining 2003 Camp Plan Update 11-5 FWCP-ChapterTwa, land Use ¡-X'. !' ...'" ,...-, .- 'I'" ,- ~, I "'-' , " ". " 1..- r-¡;, r~" ~ . ," . , : - "~".'1' £f LUP36 Develop business parks that fit into their surroundings by grouping similar industries in order to reduce or eliminate land use conflicts, allow sharing of public facilities and services, and improve traffic flow and safety. LUP37 Limit retail uses to those that serve the needs of people employed in the area. Commercial City Center Core The intent of establishing the City Center Core is to create a higher density, mixed-use designation where office, retail, government uses, and residential uses are concentrated. Other uses such as cultural/civic facilities, community services, and housing will be highly encouraged. City Center Frame The City Center Frame designation will have a look and feel similar to the Core and will provide a zone of less dense, mixed-use development physically surrounding a portion of the City Center Core. Together, they are meant to complement each other to create a "downtown" area. A more detailed description, along with goals and policies regarding the City Center Core and Frame, can be found in the City Center chapter. Community Business The Community Business designation encompasses two major retail areas of the City. It covers the "strip" retail areas along SR-99 and the large "bulk" retail area found near the South 348th Street area, approximately between SR-99 and 1-5. Community Business allows a large range of uses and is the City's largest retail designation in terms of area. The Community Business designation generally runs along both sides of SR-99 from South 272od to South 348th. A wide range of development types, appearance, ages, function, and scale can be found along SR-99. Older, single-story developments provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment. Due in part to convenient access and available land, the South 348th Street area has become a preferred location for large bulk retailers such as Eagle Hardware, Home Depot, and Costco. Due to the size of these facilities, the challenge will be to develop these uses into well functioning, aesthetically pleasing retail environments. To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionally attractive, revised development standards, applied through Community Business zoning and Community Design Guidelines, address design quality, mixed-use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site design, modulation, and setback requirements are also addressed. Through regulations in the Community Business land use chart, the size and scale of hotels, motels, and office uses have been limited in scale so as not to compete with the City Center. 2003 Camp Plan Update 11-21 FWCP- Chapter Two, Land Use Goal LUG6 Policies LUP38 LUP39 EXHIB.!T_- PAGE___-S 7.- -:, Transform Community Business areas into vital, attractive, mixed-use areas that appeal to pedestrians and motorists and enhance the community's image. Encourage transformation of Pacific Highway (SR-99) Community Business corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. Encourage auto-oriented large bulk retailers to locate in the South 348th Street Community Business area. Freeway Commercial The Freeway Commercial designation is intended for areas that border the I-5/South 320th and I-5/SR 18interchanges with convenient freeway access and visibility. Freeway Commercial areas are typicallv large in size (five acres or greater). The range of commercial land uses permitted in these areas is limited to uses that are difficult to site in the city's other commercially designated areas due to their large site size requirements and/or difficulty in adapting to pedestrian-oriented areas. Freeway Commercial areas are particularly suitable for automobile sales. home furnishings centers. and related retail and service uses that require large tracts of land. convenient freeway access and visibility. Goal LUG7 Policies LUP40 LUP41 LUP42 Encourage the development of limited areas with high levels of freeway access and visibility as suitable locations for freeway-oriented businesses to locate within the city in a cohesive development pattern that also meets the community's product and service needs. Encourage freeway oriented uses to locate in Freeway Commercial-designated areas. Encourage quality regional destination retail development through the utilization of appropriate design guidelines and development standards. The development of freeway commercial areas should respond to the needs of consumers by providing for ease of access and circulation and convenient grouping of complementary uses. 2003 Camp Plan Update 11-22 FWCP-ChapterTwo, Land Use LUP43 EXHIBIT_- 1- PAGE_'- - ~';-: 1 Create additional development standards to mitigate impacts to neighboring residential uses. Neighborhood Business There are a dozen various sized nodes of Neighborhood Business located throughout the City. These nodes are areas that have historically provided retail and/or services to adjacent residential areas. The FWCP recognizes the importance of finnly fixed boundaries to prevent commercial intrusion into adjacent neighborhoods. Neighborhood Business areas are intended to provide convenient goods (e.g., groceries and hardware) and services (e.g., dry cleaners, dentist, bank) at a pedestrian and neighborhood scale close to adjacent residential uses. Developments combining residential and commercial uses provide a convenient living environment within these nodes. In the future, attention should be given to design features that enhance the appearance or function of these areas. Improvements may include sidewalks, open space and street trees, and parking either on street or oriented away from the street edge. The function of neighborhood business areas can also be enhanced by safe pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections to surrounding neighborhoods. The need to address expansion or intensification may occur in the future depending on population growth. Future neighborhood business locations should be carefully chosen and sized to meet the needs of adjacent residential areas. Goal LUG7 Policies LUP40 LUP41 LUP42 LUP43 LUP44 LUP45 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Integrate retail developments into surrounding neighborhoods through attention to quality design and function. Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and services. Encourage neighborhood retail and personal services to locate at appropriate locations where local economic demand and design solutions demonstrate compatibility with the neighborhood. Retail and personal services should be encouraged to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. Neighborhood Business centers should consist of neighborhood scale retail and personal services. Encourage mixed residential and commercial development in Neighborhood 2003 Camp Plan Update 11-23 FWCP-ChapterTwo,LandUse EXHIBIT__~ 1 ~ PAGE ., ~)F~ the PAS will not have to go through prolonged environmental review ~an be a powerful incentive for private development in the City Center. - - Subarea Plans Over the years, citizens from various areas of the City have come forth to testify before the Planning Commission and City Council regarding their neighborhood or business area. Development of subarea plans can lead to area specific visions and policies. This type of specific planning, developed with citizen input and direction, can lead to improved confidence and ownership in the community. Areas where subarea planning should be considered include: SR-99 Corridor, South 348th Street area, and Twin Lakes neighborhood. Incentives Develop an incentives program, for both residential and commercial development. Incentives should be substantial enough to attract development and should be used to create affordable and desired types of housing and to encourage development within the City Center. Table II-3 Land Use Classifications Comprehensive Plan Classification Zoning Classification Single Family - Low Density Residential Suburban Estates (SE), one dwelling unit per five acres Single Family - Medium Density Residential RS 35,000 & 15,000 Single Family - High Density Residential RS 9600, 7200, 5000 Multiple Family Residential RM 3600, 2400, 1800 City Center Core City Center Core City Center Frame City Center Frame Office Park Office Park, Office Park 1,2, & 3 Professional Office Professional Office Community Business Community Business Business Park Business Park Freeway Commercial Freeway Commercial Neighborhood Business Neighborhood Business Corporate Park Corporate Park-l Commercial Recreation Office Park-4 Open Space & Parks A variety of zoning is assigned. 2003 Camp Plan Update II-55 FWCP - Chapter Four, Economic Development EXHJB~~ PAGE.. , 8 .1 Retail Areas . SeaTac Mall and other regional retailers within the City redevelop/reposition to meet changing consumer demand and become more competitive with other regional retailers. .. High-volume retail in Federal Way increases faster than population. . Growth in resident-serving retail occurs in the City Center, existing commercial nodes~ and in redevelopment areas along SR-99. . Neighborhood scale retail development keeps pace with population growth and to an increasing extent, is accommodated within mixed-use buildings in more concentrated neighborhood villages. . Pedestrian-oriented retail development emerges gradually in the redeveloped City Center. . Small amounts of retail use occur on the ground floor of offices, residential buildings, and parking structures. . Neighborhood scale retail development in concentrated neighborhood villages emerges in response to growth in multiple-family concentrations in the 1-5/SR-99 corridor and new single-family development on the east side ofl-5. . Old, outdated strip centers along the SR-99 corridor redevelop as a mix of retail, office, and dense residential uses. . The large truck-stop facility at the intersection of Enchanted Parkway and South 348th Street is redeveloped into a retail or mixed-use commercial center. . Freeway oriented commercial development providing for automobile sales. home furnishings centers. hotels and related retail and service uses are located in areas bordering the I-5/SR-18 and I-5/S 320th St interchanges within areas of appropriate size and with convenient access and visibility. Office Development . Offices of regional, national, and/or international finns locate in West Campus, East Campus, and the City Center. . Garden, high-rise, and mid-rise office space, and modern light-industrial buildings increase rapidly in areas with land assembled for business parks and in redeveloped retail areas. 2003 Comp Plan Updates IV-15 22-XXX New vehicle sales. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (FC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. " THEN, across for REGULATIONS S Minimums S 5 Required Yards ;;¡ g --- C'" .c ¡..¡ 'Oø..... g =: .g ~.!:ì ~ '" .- V) ë .. <:I" > .... 0 '0 2 U 0 .. .- w. ea::: ,..¡ "" V) USE Retail establishment providing for new vehicle sales including boats, motorcycles and recreational vehicle RV sales æ u ea::: 'õe - '" ~ü .> Ë ::I:~ 35 t["i;bõve average building elevation Process III acres See notes 2 and 3 Process 1, u, ill and IV are described in §§ 22.JSI - 22-356, 22-361 - 22.370, 22.3116 - 22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. USE ZONE CHART ~ co co. '0 V) U C>II .: c ",.- ¡r~ ea:::ø... ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Retail I. The hours of operation may be limited to reduce the impacts on nearby residential uses. facilities: I 2. Ifany portion ofa structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure for every 300 shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of 50 ft. from the property line of the sq. ft of residential zone. . gross floor 3. The height of that portion of a Structure located 100ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft. above average building elevation to a area maximum of 55 ft., ifall of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and Oth '. b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and ern:tse. c. An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and determIned d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. on a cas~-by. 4. Used vehicle sales, gasoline service stations, service, maintenance and body shops, car washes, auto supply stores, hazardous waste case basis treatment and storage facilities, and coffee shops are only permitted as an accessory use to a new vehicle sales establishment. 5. Gas pump islands, canopies, and covers over pump islands may not be closer than 25 ft. to any property line, unless located adjacent to a residential zone, in which case the setback shall be 50 ft. Outdoor vehicle display areas and service areas may not be closer than lOft. to any property line, unless located adjacent to a residential zone, in which case the setback shall be 50 ft. 6. Auto and boat body repair and/or painting may be permitted under this section only if: a. Building layout and design mitigates impact of dust, fumes, noise, glare, odor, or any other discharge on neighboring uses and natural systems; protects neighboring uses and natural systems from accidental spillage, leakage, or discharge of hazardous material and pollutants; b. All storage, operations, service, painting, and repair are conducted within enclosed buildings. 7. Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way. 8. Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities must comply with state citing criteria adopted in accordance with Chapter 70. iiUcm 9. No use or activity shall be conducted that involves the release of toxic or noxious gases, fumes, or odors. ~ ~ 10. No use or activity shall be conducted that results in the contamination of stormwater, surface water, or groundwater pursuant hap, Article IV. I I.The site must be designed so that noise associated with public address systems; vehicle repair or maintenance; and truck parki adJR8o8l' maneuvering; will not be audible off the subject property, based on a certificate to this effect, signed by an acoustical engineer an I d ~e development permit application. I - 12. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requiremetlts, i.e., ~e<J.u"'ed buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. : . I 13. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX. Areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the 'parking lot design requirements of Section 22-1634(b). -- 14. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. Areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the parking lot landscaping requirements of Section 22-1567. ~ 15. Areas where vehicles are displayed are not subject to the provisions of Article XIII, Section 1113, Outdoor Activities and Storage: 16. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. 17. For noise standards that apply to the project, see Chapter 10, Article II. -L 18. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject proper!V. For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. I ..r-e For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22.1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22.1131 et seq. 22-XXX Retail. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (FC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this sectIOn: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS :2 Minimums S ~ Required Yards ~ g --- '" -oC:: -5 ¡.¡ i!:! ~ 1:1 i3 =: .- <1) .- - ......, "'.- C/J C <1) 0-.. - 0 -0 ~ ~ .3 ~ Ci3 USE Retail establishment selling household goods and furnishings, household appliances and home electronics (excluding bulk and big box retail) Retail Outlet centers (excluding bulk and big box retail) æ <1) ¡:,:: .... <1) 0 .... -.a -§¡u 'õ Ë :I:C/J ~ c. -oC/J <1) bJ) .... C '5 .- ~~ ¡:,::"" USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES I. The hours of operation may be limited to reduce impacts on nearby residential uses. 2. ¡fany portion ora structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft. from the property line of the residential zone. 3. If approved through Process III, the height of that portion ofa structure located 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft. above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 ft., if all of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and c. An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. 4. Assembly or manufacture of goods on the subject property is permitted only if: a. The assembly or manufacture is clearly accessory to an allowed use conducted on the subject property and is directly related to and dependent on this allowed use; and b. The assembled or manufactured goods are available for purchase and removal from the subject property and are for sale only to retail purchasers; and c. There are no outward appearance or impacts from the assembly or manufacture. 5. Restaurants, not exceeding 7,500 square feet in gross floor area, are allowed as an accessory use to the outlet center. -n ~ 6. Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and ven~ si i a features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way. p 7. Outdoor use, activity, and storage is regulated by Article XIII, Section 1113. 1"""\ -r- 8. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requireme6t:1, Ie., i8I\IIired buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. m - 9. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX. OJ. 10. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. - 11. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. =- -f 112. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. ..... ' L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. Process II INone 120 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 35 ft. above Retail facilities: See notes 2, 3 and average I for every 300 Possible I 110 building sq.ftofgross Process elevation floor area III See Note 3 See notes 2 and 3 Process I, n, ill and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386-22-411, 22-431- 22-460, respectively. I for each 100 sq. ft. of gross floor area for restaurants c > For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. ~ -I 22-XXX Entertainment, etc. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (Fe) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this sectIon: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS 9 Minimums E:;( ~ Required Yards ...¡ " ~ g C .",ð: ¡;¡¡ ,,~ =: .!::" ::S.- 0":- " " ~~ USE Retail establishment providing entertainment, recreational or cultural services or activities Golf driving range Process II INone Possible Process III See Note H Process I, II, ill and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361-22-370, 22-386-22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. " N ¡;j ë: ,....¡ :c ~ ~ " .", ¡;j c: 0 ~ 20 ft.5 ft. \5 ft. See notes 2, 3 and 6 æ " ~ ..... " 0 ... - ::s oCt) .~ .5 :I:r/J '" " u '" P. .",r/J " bO 'Š .5 g~ ~p.. USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES I. The hours of operation may be limited to reduce the impacts on nearby residential uses. 2. Ifany portion ofa structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft. from the property line of the residential zone. 3. If approved through Process III, the height of that portion ofa structure located 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft. above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 ft., if all of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and c. An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. 4. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 5. Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way. 6. Outdoor use, activity, and storage is regulated by Article XIII, Section 1113. 7. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIx. 8. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. 9. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. 10. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. II. Minor and supporting structures constructed as a functional requirement of golf driving ranges may exceed the applicable height limitation provided that the director of community development services determines that such structures will not significantly impact adjoining properties. 35 ft. above ¡Determined average on a case-by- building case basis elevation See notes 2, and 3 and 8 L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. U III J»< G)I IT1õ5 For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. --I I ... ; '-I F t'" -- 22-XXX Hotel. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (Fe} zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS S2 Minimums ~ ~ Required Yards ... OJ ;;¡ g ç;, ""~ ¡.¡ OJ ~ ::z= .= OJ ::1.- 0-> OJ OJ ~~ USE Hotel æ OJ ~ '- OJ 0... ~.a -§¡u .- 2 OJ ~ :I:CIJ '" OJ U '" 0- ""CIJ OJ OJ) .= '" g.:;;¡ OJ æ ~¡:,., ZONE FC OJ N i:i5 Õ ....¡ ë: e .... ;;: ~ ~ OJ "" i:i5 SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Process II INone 120 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 35 ft. above lOne for each See notes 1,2 and average guest room. Possible I \8 building Process elevation III See note 3 I. Ifany portion ofa structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of 20 ft. from the property line of the residential zone. 2. If approved through Process Ill, the height of that portion of a structure located 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft. above average building elevation to a maximum of 55 ft., if all of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and c. An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. .,3. If this use includes accessory meeting, convention or other facilities that will be used by persons other than overnight guests at the hotel, the city may require additional parking on a case-by-case basis, based on the extent and nature of these accessory facilities. 4. Truck parking, loading, and maneuvering areas; areas where noise generating outdoor uses and activities may occur; and vents and similar features must be located as far as possible from any residential zone and secondarily, from any public right-of-way. 5. Outdoor use, activity, and storage is regulated by Article XIII, Section 1113. 6. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 7. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX. 8. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. 9. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. 10. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. See Note 2 See notes I - 2 For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. =e--m »X G>I miñ - ;--of Process I, II, III and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22.356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22.386 - 22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. LFor other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. -- 0 I" ~ -- ~ 22-XXX Public utility. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (FC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. . . THEN, across for REGULATIONS 9 Minimums - S ~ Required Yards ;¡ g '"' "... .<= ¡.¡ "" ¡:,. '" g =: .g ~ .~ - ~ ::I .- CI1 I: '" 0- > - 0 "" ~~ .3 ~ èi5 USE Public utility Process II INone æ '" ~ ..... 0 !:! .§¡fl '¡) 2 ::r:<i5 Possible Process III Public Utility Public 20 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. Utilities: See Notes 1,2 and 3b5 ft 7 a ove average building elevation See note 2 Process I, II, III and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22-41 I, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. See notes I and 2 t>O I: ~ ¡:,. "" '" 'Š 8 0-«1 '" Q. ~V) Determined on a case-by-case basis. USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES I. If any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft. from the property line ofthe residential zone. 2. If approved through Process IU, the height of that portion of a structure located 100 ft. or more from a residential zone may exceed 35 ft., if all of the following criteria are met: a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and b. That portion of the structure is set back an additional one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building elevation; and c. An increase in height above 35 ft. will not block views designated by the comprehensive plan; and d. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive plan. 3. May be permitted only iflocating this use in the immediate area of the subject property is necessary to permit etTective service to the area to be served. 4. If determined necessary to mitigate visual and noise impacts to surrounding properties, the city may require additional landscaping or butTers on a case-by-case basis. 5. No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e. required butTers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 6. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX. 7. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. 8. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. 9. Refer to §22-946 et seq to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. -om 1>X QI m -~ . OJ I.... I~ 01, jTl --- For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. 22-XXX Public Transit Shelter The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (Fe) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this sectIOn: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULA nONS 9 Minimums ~ ~ Required Yards ...¡ OJ ;;;;¡ g '" ..,¡t; ¡.¡ OJ ~ =: .: OJ '" .- cr:> OJ OJ p::p:: USE OJ N Ci5 Õ ....:I :c ;;¡ ~ OJ "0 Ci5 ë e "'"' Public transit I Process I INone I Public Transit shelter Shelter õft:lõitTõ ft. Process I, D, III and IV are described in §§ 22-351-22-356, 22.361 - 22-370, 22.386 - 22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. a OJ p:: 'õ !:! .... '" -§¡õ .¡¡ .s :r:", Transit Shelter: 15 ft. above average building elevation OJ) c:: ~ p.. .., ~ VI .- OJ '" 0 cr", OJ Q. p::", None USE ZONE CHART ZONE FC SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES I. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX 2. There are no landscaping requirements for this use. The larger site on which it is located is subject to the landscaping requirements of Article XVII. 3. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. 4. Refer to §22-946 et seq to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. u n~¡ þ. >< G". I " } m .'- . OJ I - \ ¡~ 1-. I . t . u iì1 , - 22-XXX Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the freeway commercial (Fe) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this sectlOn: USE ZONE CHART ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS 9 Minimums ~ ~ Required Yards ...¡ 8 ;;;;¡ 0 '" ..,¡t; ¡.¡ OJ ~ =: .: OJ '" .- cr:> OJ OJ p::p:: USE Personal wireless service facility OJ N Ci5 Õ ....:I ë 0 ~ :c ;;¡ ~ OJ "0 Ci5 See note 2 None ¡See ¡See ¡See note I note note I I See note 5 for allowed types of PWSFs Process I, II, UI and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22.361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22-411, 22-431 - 22-460, respectively. a OJ p:: 'õ ~ -.;: ~o .¡¡ .s :r:", Refer to §22-967 for maximum heights for allowed types of PWSFs See note 3 OJ §- 0 VI "0 § ....:I See \Not note allowed 4 on a PWSF ~ OJ) Ci5 I OJ) c:: ~ p.. .., ~ VI .- OJ '" 0 cr", OJ p. p::", SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES ZONE FC N/A 11. For developed sites, the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the subject property. For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new freestanding PWSFs shall be 20 ft. for front, side, and rear yards. 2. Subject to meeting all applicable development standards, the review process used shall be Process I, except for the following proposals: a. Process III for the following proposals: (1) The PWSF is located within 300 ft. of a residential zone; (2) The PWSF is located on a structure that is a residence or school or contains a residence or school; or (3) The PWSF is a new freestanding PWSF. b. Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodating four or more providers. 3. Maximum allowed height for a new freestanding PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to \00 ft., plus any height granted under § 22.1047. A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120 ft. if there are two or more providers, except that a lattice tower of between 120 ft. and 150 ft. will be allowed under a combined application off our or more providers. 4. All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII of this chapter, and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations. At a minimum, a five ft. type III landscaping area shall be required around the facility, unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened. 5. New freestanding PWSFs are allowed subject to height limits and collocation provisions. PWSFs are allowed on existing towers, on private buildings and structures, on publicly used structures not located in public rights-of-way, on existing structures located in the BPA trail, and on existing structures in appropriate public rights-of-way. Refer to § 22-967 for development standards applicable to allowed types of PWSFs. 6. For all other development standards, see Article XIII, Section 22-966 et a!. For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. --am »x Q..I mõJ I ~ I... ! ~I~ .... For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. 10-26 General prohibition. It is unlawful for any person to cause, or for any person in possession of property to allow to originate from the property, sound that is a public disturbance noise. (Ord. No. 90-37, § 1(A), 2- 20-90) EXH\B\T_- ." PAGE_I__~)E I 10-27 Illustrative enumeration. The following sounds are public disturbance noises in violation of this article: (l) The frequent, repetitive or continuous sounding of any horn or siren attached to a motor vehicle, except as a warning of danger or as specifically permitted or required by law. (2) The creation of frequent, repetitive or continuous sounds in connection with the starting, operation, repair, rebuilding or testing of any motor vehicle, motorcycle, off-highway vehicle or internal combustion engine within a residential district, so as to unreasonably disturb or interfere with the peace and comfort of owners or possessors of real property. (3) Y elling, sho~ting, whistling or singing on or near the public streets, particularly between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. or at any time and place as to unreasonably disturb or interfere with the peace and comfort of owners or possessors of real property. (4) The creation of frequent, repetitive or continuous sounds which emanate from any building, structure, apartment or condominium, which unreasonably disturbs or interferes with the peace and comfort of owners or possessors of real property, such as sounds from musical instruments, audio sound systems, band sessions or social gatherings. (5) Sound from motor vehicle audio sound systems, such as tape players, radios and compact disc players, operated at a volume so as to be audible greater than 50 feet from the vehicle itself. (6) Sound from portable audio equipment, such as tape players, radios, and compact disc players, operated at a volume so as to be audible greater than 50 feet from the source, and if not operated upon the property of the operator. (7) The squealing, screeching or other such sounds from motor vehicle tires in contact with the ground or other roadway surface because of rapid acceleration, braking or excessive speed around comers or because of such other reason; provided, that sounds which result from actions which are necessary to avoid danger shall be exempt from this section. (8) Sounds originating from construction sites, including but not limited to sounds from construction equipment, power tools and hammering between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 8:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends. (9) Sounds originating from residential property relating to temporary projects for the maintenance or repair of horns, grounds and appurtenances, including but not limited to sounds from lawnmowers, powered hand tools, snow removal equipment and composters between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends. (Ord. No. 90-65, § 1(B), 7-3-90; Ord. No. 99-341, § 3, 5-4-99) <92002 Code Publishing Cò. Page 1 EXHIBIT__" P.A (~E--l- ,~) F ---2- Federal Way City Code Chapter 22, Article XIII, "Supplementary District Regulations" 22-966 Personal wireless service facilities (PWSF). (a) Purpose. This section addresses the issues of location and appearance associated with personal wireless service facilities. It provides adequate siting opportunities through a wide range of locations and options which minimize safety hazards and visual impacts sometimes associated with wireless communications technology. The siting of facilities on existing buildings or structures, collocation of several providers' facilities on a single support structure, and visual mitigation measures are required, unless otherwise allowed by the city, to maintain neighborhood appearance and reduce visual clutter in the city. (b) Definitions. Any words, terms or phrases used in this section which are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in FWCC 22-1. (c) Exemptions. The following antennas and facilities are exempt from the provisions of this section and shall be permitted in all zones consistent with applicable development standards as outlined in the use zone charts, Article XI of this chapter, District Regulations: (l) Wireless communication facilities used by federal, state, or local public agencies for temporary emergency communications in the event of a disaster, emergency preparedness, and public health or safety purposes. (2) Industrial processing equipment and scientific or medical equipment using frequencies regulated by the FCC; provided such equipment complies with all applicable provisions of FWCC 22-960, Rooftop Appurtenances, and Chapter 22 FWCC, Article XIII, Division 5, Height. (3) Citizen band radio antennas or antennas operated by federally licensed amateur ("ham") radio operators; provided such antennas comply with all applicable provisions of FWCC 22-960, Rooftop Appurtenances, and Chapter 22 FWCC, Article XlII, Division 5, Height. (4) Satellite dish antennas less than two meters in diameter, including direct-to-home satellite services, when used as a secondary use of the property; provided such antennas comply with all applicable provisions of FWCC 22-960, Rooftop Appurtenances, and Chapter 22 FWCC, Article XIII, Division 5, Height. (5) Automated meter reading (AMR) facilities for the purpose of collecting utility meter data for use in the sale of utility services, except for whip or other antennas greater than two feet in length; provided the AMR facilities are within the scope of activities permitted under a valid franchise agreement between the utility service provider and the city. (6) Routine maintenance or repair of a wireless communication facility and related equipment excluding structural work or changes in height, dimensions, or visual impacts of the antenna, tower, or buildings; provided, that compliance with the standards of this chapter are maintained. (d) Prioritized locations. The following sites shall be the required order of locations for proposed PWSFs, including antenna and equipment shelters. In proposing a PWSF in a particular location, the applicant shall analyze the feasibility of locating the proposed PWSF in each of the higher priority locations and document, to the city's satisfaction, why locating the PWSF in each higher priority location and/or zone is not being proposed. In order of preference, the prioritized locations for PWSFs are as follows: (l) Structures located in the BP A trail. A PWSF may be located on any existing support structure currently located in the easement upon which are located U.S. Department of Energy/ Bonneville Power Administration ("BP A") Power Lines regardless of underlying zoning. <92002 Code Publishing Co. Page 1 EXHIBIT_.." PAGE~-JF~ (2) Existing broadcast, relay and transmission towers. A PWSF may be located on an existing site or tower where a legal wireless telecommunication facility is currently located regardless of underlying zoning. If an existing site or tower is located within a one mile radius of a proposed PWSF location, the applicant shall document why collocation on the existing site or tower is not being proposed, regardless of whether the existing site or tower is located within the jurisdiction of the city. (3) Publicly used structures. If the city consents to such location, a PWSF may be located on existing public facilities within all zoning districts, such as water towers, utility structures, fire stations, bridges, and other public buildings, provided the public facilities are not located within public rights-of-way. (4) Appropriate business, commercial, and city center zoned sites. A PWSF may be located on private buildings or structures within appropriate business, commercial, and city center zoning districts. The preferred order of zoning districts for this category of sites is as follows: BP - Business Park FC - Freeway Commercial CP-l - Corporate Park OP through OP-4 - Office Park CC-C - City Center Core CC-F - City Center Frame BC - Community Business (5) Appropriate public rights-of-way. For the purposes of this section, appropriate public rights-of-way shall be defined as including those public rights-of-way with functional street classifications of principal arterial, minor arterial, and principal collector. A PWSF may be located on existing structures in appropriate public rights-of-way. Structures proposed for location of PWSFs shall be separated by at least 330 linear feet. Within any residential zone, neighborhood business (BN) zone, or professional office (PO) zone, there shall be no more than one PWSF located on an existing structure. Location of a PWSF on an existing structure in an appropriate public right-of-way shall require a right-of-way permit in addition to the required use process approval. The preferred order of functional street classifications for this category of sites is as follows: Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Principal Collector If the PWSF is proposed to be located in an appropriate public right-of-way and the surrounding uses or zoning are not the same, that portion of the right-of-way with the most intensive use and/or zoning shall be the preferred location. If the PWSF is proposed to be located in an appropriate public right-of-way and surrounding uses or zoning are the same, the preferred location shall be that portion of the right-of-way with the least adverse visual impacts. (6) If the applicant demonstrates to the city's satisfaction that it is not technically possible to site in a prioritized location, the city reserves the right to approve alternative site locations if a denial would be in violation of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, as determined by the city. (Ord. No. 97-300, § 3,9-16-97; Ord. No. 00-363, § 14, 1-4-00; Ord. No. 01-399, § 3, 8-7-01) <Q2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 2 FREEWAY COMMERCIAL sIE~ I B IT PAGE__I I' -5 22-1601 Signs in nonresidential zoning districts. (a) Freestanding signs. Permit applications for freestanding signs shall be designated as qualifying for a high profile, medium profile, ef low profile sign, or highway profile category A, based upon criteria regarding both the size and zoning designation of the development. The sign profile designation shall control the sign types, sign height, sign area and number of signs allowed. Separate parcels or pads for single-tenant buildings that comply with all zoning requirements for single-tenant parcels, excluding access, and are not otherwise tied to an adjacent multi-tenant center by virtue of architectural style or theme, are permitted one freestanding monument or pedestal sign not to exceed a maximum sign area of 80 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 40 square feet. (1) High profile- sign. a. Criteria. A subject property meeting all of the following criteria is permitted a high profile freestanding sign: 1. A minimum of 250 feet of frontage on one public right-of-way; - 2. A zoning designation of city center core (CC-C) or city center frame (CC-F), or community business (BC); 3. A multiuse complex; and 4. A minimum site of 15 acres in size. b. Sign types. The following sign types are allowed for a high profile sign: 1. Pylon or pole signs; provided, however, that any pylon or pole sign must have more than one pole or structural support; 2. Pedestal signs; 3. Monument signs; 4. Tenant directory signs; and 5. Kiosks. Sign content for any pylon or pole sign, or for any pedestal or monument sign in lieu of a pylon or pole sign, may include electronic changeable messages, center identification signs and/or changeable copy signs. Any high profile sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. c. Sign height. A high profile sign shall not exceed the following maximum heights: 1. Pylon or pole sign: Twenty-five feet; 2. Pedestal or monument signs: Twelve feet if in lieu of a pylon or pole sign. Otherwise, pedestal and monument signs shall not exceed five feet; 3. Tenant directory or kiosk signs: Six feet unless the sign is set back a minimum of 50 feet hom any public right-of-way, in which case it may be 10 feet. d. Sign area. A high profile sign shall not exceed the following maximum sign areas: 1. Pylon or pole sign: 400 square feet for the total of sign faces with no óne sign face exceeding 200 square feet; 2. Pedestal or monument signs: 128 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one face exceeding 64 square feet; 3. Tenant directory or kiosk signs: 15 square feet per sign face. e. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a high profile sign may have the following maximum number of signs: FREEWAY CO MMERCIAL ~ I B IT :2 PAGE- - - 1. Pylon or pole sign: One sign unless the subject property has an additional 500 feet of street frontage for a total of 750 feet of aggregate frontage on any public rights-of-way, in which case the subject property will be allowed one additional high profile sign, not to exceed a maximum of two such signs per subject property; 2. Pedestal or monument signs: If the pedestal or monument sign is in lieu of a pylon or pole sign, the number of signs allowed shall be detennined pursuant to subsection (e)( 1) of this section. In addition, two monument signs which identify the name of any multiuse complex are allowed, per entrance from a public right-of-way, not to exceed five feet in height; and 3. Tenant directory or kiosk signs: One sign per frontage on a public right-of-way. (2) Medium profile sign. a. Criteria. A subject property that does not qualify for a high profile sign pursuant to subsection (a)(I) of this section and is not a low profile sign by being zoned office park (OP) or professional office (PO) pursuant to subsection (a)(3) of this section is pennitted a medium profile freestanding sign. b. Sign types. The following sign types are allowed for a medium profile sign: 1. Pedestal signs; and 2. Monument signs. Sign content for any medium profile sign may include electronic changeable messages, center identification signs and/or changeable copy signs. Any medium profile sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. c. Sign height. The height of a medium profile sign shall be calculated at the rate of 0.75 feet in the sign height for every 10 lineal feet of frontage on a public right-of-way; provided, however, that sign height shall be calculated at the rate of one and one-half feet in sign height for every 10 lineal feet of frontage on a public right-of-way for any multi-tenant complex; and provided further, that such sign shall not exceed a maximum height of 12 feet and every applicant is entitled to a minimum height of five feet. d. Sign area. For any multi-tenant complex, sign area allowed for a medium profile signs shall be calculated at the rate of two square feet per lineal foot of frontage on a public right-of- way not to exceed a maximum sign area of 128 square feet for the total of all sign faces on each permitted sign with no one sign face exceeding 64 square feet. For other uses, sign area allowed for medium profile sign shall be calculated at the rate of one square foot per lineal foot of frontage on a public right-of-way not to exceed a maximum sign area of 80 square feet for the total of all sign faces on each permitted sign with no one sign face exceeding 40 square feet. Notwithstanding the foregoing sign area calculations, every applicant is entitled to a minimum sign area of 50 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 25 square feet. 18 --5 e. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a medium profile sign may have one pedestal or monument sign for each street frontage. Each street frontage exceeding 300 linear feet and containing more than one vehicular access is pennitted one additional freestanding sign. No subject property may contain more than three freestanding signs regardless of total linear street frontage and no one street frontage may have more than two freestanding signs. Freestanding signs shall be located a minimum distance of 200 feet from other freestanding signs on the same subject property. (3) Low profile sign. a. Criteria. A subject property located in the office park (OP) or professional office (PO) zone is pennitted a low profile freestanding sign. b. Sign types. The following sign types are allowed for a low profile sign: 1. Pedestal signs; 2. Monument signs; and 3. Tenant directory signs. Sign content for any pedestal or monument sign may include center identification signs and/or changeable copy signs. Any low profile sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. c. Sign height. A low profile sign shall not exceed the following maximum heights: I. Pedestal or monument signs: Five feet. 2. Tenant directory signs: Six feet unless the sign is set back a minimum of 50 feet from any public right-of-way, in which case it may be 10 feet. d. Sign area. 1. Pedestal or monument signs: Sign area allowed for a low profile sign shall be calculated at the rate of one square foot per lineal foot of frontage on a public right-of-way; provided, however, that a low profile sign shall not exceed a maximum sign area of 80 square feet for the total of all sign faces on each permitted sign with no one sign face exceeding 40 square feet, and every applicant is entitled to a minimum sign area of 50 square feet for the total of all sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 25 square feet; 2. Tenant directory signs: 15 square feet per sign face. e. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a low profile sign may have the following maximum number of signs: 1. Pedestal or monument signs: One sign per frontage on a public right-of-way; and 2. Tenant direc!ory signs: One sign per frontage on a public right-of-way. FREEWAY COMMERCIALË~~ B IT PAGE_- 3 Ii <:- --5 (4) Highway Profile Category A signs. In addition to the categories available in FWCC Section 22-1601(a)(1-3), a subject property may be permitted one of the following freestanding signs if it meets the criteria listed in highway profile category A below. Highway Profile Category A 1. Criteria. A subject property is permitted an additional highway profile category A freestanding sign if the subject property meets all of the following criteria: a. Abuts the right of way of Interstate 5; b. Is located in a zoning designation offreeway commercial (FC). 2. Sign types. A pylon or pole sign is allowed, provided, that any pylon or pole sign must have more than one pole or structural supþort. Sign content for any pylon or pole sign may include center identification signs, provided, that all font sizes used are a minumum 2.5 feet tall. Trademarks or copvwrite symbols are exempt from the font size requirement. Any highway profile category A may be an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. Electronic changeable copy and/or changeable coPy signs are not permitted. The sign must be oriented toward the freeway (not the off-ramþs) and be located near the property line closest to the freeway and be visible from the freeway. 3. Sign height. A highway profile category A sign shall not exceed 25 feet above the elevation of the nearest driving lane of the freeway at a point nearest to the proposed location of the sign. The sign height shall be measured by a licensed surveyor and the applicant shall be responsible for providing the surveyor. If the subject property has an elevation that is higher than the nearest driving lane of the freeway, then the sign shall be no taller than 15 feet above the average finished ground elevation measured at the midpoint of the sign base. FREEWAY COMMERCIAL S~~, B IT PAGE_~ '8- -' ~-:5- 4. Sign area. A highway profile category A sign shall not exceed 600 square feet for the total of sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 300 square feet. If the subject property has an elevation that is higher than the nearest driving lane of the freeway, then the sign area shall not exceed 400 square feet for the total of sign faces with no one sign face exceeding 200 square feet. 5. Number of signs. A subject property qualifying for a highway profile sign may have only one (I) highway profile category A sign per subject property. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for coordinating any such sign with the State of Washington Scenic Vistas Act. ~ill Combined sign package for adjacent property owners. The owners of two or more properties that abut or are separated only by a vehicular access easement or tract may propose a combined sign package to the city. The city will review and decide upon the proposal using process III. The city may approve the combined sign package if it will provide more coordinated, effective and efficient signs. The allowable sign area, sign type, sign height and number of signs will be determined as if the applicants were one multi-tenant complex. (b) Building-mounted signs. (1) Sign types. The following sign types may be building-mounted signs and are allowed in all nonresidential zoning districts: a. Awning or canopy signs; b. Center identification signs; c. Changeable copy signs; d. Civic event signs; e. Directional signs, on-site; f. Electronic changeable message signs; g. Instructional signs; h. Marquee signs; i. Projecting signs; j. Tenant directory signs; k. Time and temperature signs; 1. Under canopy signs; and ill. Wall-mounted signs. Any building-mounted sign may be an electrical sign, an illuminated sign, and/or a neon sign. (2) Sign height. No sign shall project above the roofline ofthe exposed building face to which it is attached. (3) Sign area. The total sign area of building-mounted signs for each business or tenant, excluding under canopy signs, shall not exceed seven percent of the exposed building face to which it is attached; provided, however, that no individual sign shall exceed a sign area of 240 square feet and every applicant is entitled to a minimum sign area of 30 square feet. A multi- tenant complex which does not use a freestanding sign may have two additional wall-mounted signs. No one sign may exceed seven percent of the exposed building face to which it is attached, to a maximum of 240 square feet per sign. This sign is in addition to any other tenant signs on that building face. (4) Number of signs. The number of building-mounted signs permitted each user is dependent upon the surface area of the largest single exposed building face of his or her building as follows, excluding wall-mounted center identification signs: FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SIg~ I B 11 PAGE__S Largest Exposed Maximum Building Face Number of Signs Less than 999 sq. ft. 2 1,000 - 2,999 sq. f1. 3 3,000 - 3,999 sq. f1. 4 4,000 and over sq. f1. 5 " -5 Buildings with more than 4,000 square feet on any exposed building face, with several clearly differentiated departments, each with separate exterior entrances, are permitted one sign for each different department with a separate exterior entrance, in addition to the five permitted. No sign or signs may exceed the maximum area permitted for that building face except as may be specifically permitted by this code. However, an applicant is allowed to move allotted signs, as calculated in subsection (b)( 4) from one building face to another. Each business or use shall be permitted under canopy signs in addition to the other permitted building-mounted signs subject to the size and separation requirements set forth in FWCC 22- 1599(c)(2)(w). (c) Sign area multipliers. The sign area and sign number allowed, as set forth in subsection (a)(1)(d) of this section for high profile signs, (a)(2)(d) of this section for medium profile signs, and (a)(3)(d) of this section for low profile signs and subsection (b)(3) of this section for building-mounted signs may be increased in the following instances; provided, however, that in no event shall the sign exceed the maximum sign area allowed: (1) If no signs on the subject property have internally lighted sign faces, then the total sign area allowed may be increased by 25 percent. (2) If all signs, other than center identification signs, are building-mounted signs, the total sign area allowed may be increased by 25 percent. (3) A time and temperature sign may be included with any sign and such time and temperature signs shall not be included for purposes of calculating maximum sign area or maximum number of signs. (Ord. No. 95-235, § 4, 6-6-95; Ord. No. 96-270, § 3(F), 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99- 348, § 5,9-7-99; Ord. No. 99-357, § 6,12-7-99) EXHIßC, Federal Way City CodPAGE__- Chapter 22, Article XVII, "Landscaping" t\ .2. 1 22-1566 Landscaping ~equirements by zoning district. (a) Suburban Estates, SE. (1) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines of nonresidential uses in the SE zoning district, except as provided in FWCC 22-1567 of this article. (b) Single-Family Residential, RS. (1) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines of nonresidential uses in the RS zoning districts, except as provided in FWCC 22-1567 of this article. (c) Multifamily Residential, RM. (1) Type III landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along all public rights-of-way and ingress/egress easements. (2) Type II landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along the common boundary abutting single-family zoning districts. . (3) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (c)(1) and (c )(2) ofthis section. (d) Professional Office, Po. (1) Type III landscaping eight feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. (2) Type I landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter property lines abutting a residential zoning district except for schools which shall provide 10 feet of Type II. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (d)(1) and (d)(2) of this section. (e) Neighborhood Business, BN (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all properties abutting public rights-of-way and ingress/egress easements. (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width along all perimeter lot lines except as noted in subsections (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section. (f) Community Business, BC (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all properties abutting public rights-of-way and ingress/egress easements. (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lots lines except as noted in subsections (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this section. (g) Freeway Commercial, FC (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of parking areas abutting public rights-of-way. (2) Type I landscaping 20 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zone. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this section. ~2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 1 fgj Œù City Center, Cc. : , (1) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of parking areas abutting public rights-of-way. (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines except as noted in subsections (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this section. W ill Office Park, OP; and Corporate Park, CP-I. (1) Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. (2) Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines, except as noted in subsections (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this subsection. (i) Manufactwing Park, }.1P. (i) Business Park. BP. (1) Type II landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting public rights-of-way and access easements. (2) Type I landscaping 25 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of the property abutting a residential zoning district. (3) Type II landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of the property abutting a nonresidential zoning district, except MP zones. (4) Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines except as noted in subsections (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this section. (Ord. No. 93-170, § 4, 4-20-93; Ord. No. 96-270, § 3(E), 7-2-96) EXH\B\" PAGE-.. 2. fCt ,; ~ --" (Ç)2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 2 EXHIBIT Federal Way City CodfAGE Chapter 22, Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines" ~-O --1I , 22-1638 District guidelines. In addition to the foregoing development guidelines, the following supplemental guidelines apply to individual zoning districts: (a) Professional office (PO), neighborhood business (BN), afld community business (Be), and freeway commercial (PC). (1) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of- way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right- of-way or pedestrian area. (4) If utilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl- coated mesh and powder-coated poles. For residential uses only: (5) Significant trees shall be retained within a 20-foot perimeter strip around site. (6) Landscaped yards shall be provided between building(s) and public street(s). Parking lots should be beside or behind buildings that front upon streets. (7) Parking lots should be broken up into rows containing no more than 10 adjacent stalls, separated by planting areas. (8) Pedestrian walkways (minimum six feet wide) shall be provided between the interior of the project and the public sidewalk. (9) Lighting fixtures should not exceed 20 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. This shall not apply to public parks and school stadiums. 20. F~n.: I(!. &'C. 22. (.3,'I (Ii) (10) Principal entries to buildings shall be highlighted with plaza or garden areas containing planting, lighting, seating, trellises and other features. Such areas shall be located and designed so windows overlook them. ~2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 1 , '1" \ -,' ¡... ), H ~ (-- L- ,I, ¡'- PAGE a ao ---~ ÑI:.lI" '7 . $,'l' 22. l(\:..~ «I) (11) Common recreational spaces shall be located and arranged so that windows overlook them. -~ -- ",.- Fif"ltc lb. M1'. 11. 1~¡\1I (nì (12) Units on the ground floor (when permitted) shall have private outdoor spaces adjacent to them so those exterior portions of the site are controlled by individual households. F¡ilUn,: t9.s.~(. 2:. j(,;Mì :~ (13) All new buildings, including accessory buildings, such as carports and garages shall appear to have a roof pitch ranging from at least 4: 12 to a maximum of 12:12. «:>2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 2 Fí~1!X 2(1. !ie\), 22 - :638 ¡,¡; I::XH ~ b'-" PAGE 3 \ 2.0 . -'1- (14) Carports and garages in front yards should be discouraged. (15) The longest dimension of any building facade shall not exceed 120 feet. Buildings on the same site may be connected by covered pedestrian walkways. (16) Buildings should be designed to have a distinct "base", "middle" and "top" The base (typically the first floor) should contain the greatest number of architectural elements such as windows, materials, details, overhangs, cornice lines, and masonry belt courses. The midsection by comparison may be simple. (Note: single-story buildings have no middle.) The top should avoid the appearance of a flat roof and include distinctive roof shapes including but not limited to pitched, vaulted or terraced, etc. figure 21. 'kr, 2? 16J8 (\\) (17) Residential design features, including but not limited to entry porches, projecting window bays, balconies or decks, individual windows (rather than strip windows), offsets and cascading or stepped roof forms shall be incorporated into all buildings. Window openings shall have visible trim material or painted detailing that resembles trim. (b) Office park (OP), corporate park (CP), and business park (BP). (1) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634( d). (2) Buildings with ground floor retail sales or services should orient major entrances, display windows and other pedestrian features to the right-of-way to the extent possible. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right- of.way or pedestrian area. (4) If utilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl- coated mesh and powder-coated poles. For non-single-family residential uses only: (5) Subsections (a)(5) through (A)(17) of this section shall apply. (c) City center core (CC-C) and city center frame (CC-F). (1) The city center core and frame will contain transitional forms of development with surface parking areas. However, as new development or re-development occurs, the visual ~2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 3 EXHIBIT J~ dominance of surface parking areas shall be reduced. TheretPrA~fi park~ are~s Shand- located as follows: a. The parking is located behind the building, with the building located between the right-of-way and the parking areas, or it is located in structured parking; or . b. All or some of the parking is located to the side(s) of the building; or c. Some short-term parking may be located between the building(s) and the right-of- way, but this shall not consist of more than one double-loaded drive aisle, and pedestrian circulation shall be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). Large retail complexes may not be able to locate parking according to the above guidelines. Therefore, retail complexes of 60,000 square feet of gross floor area or larger may locate surface parking between the building(s) and the right-of-way. Howwer, this form of development shall provide for small building(s) along the right-of-way to break up and reduce the visual impact of the parking, and pedestrian circulation must be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). For purposes of this guideline, retail complex means the entire lot or parcel, or series of lots or parcels, on which a development, activity or use is located or will locate. (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of- way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. (3) Building facades that are visible from a right-of-way and subject to modulation per FWCC 22-1635(b), shall incorporate facade treatment as follows: . a. The facade incorporates modulation and/or a landscape screening, pursuant to FWCC 22-1635(b); and b. The facade incorporates an arcade, canopy or plaza; and/or one or more articulation element listed in FWCC 22-1635( c )(2); provided, that the resulting building characteristics achieve visual interest and appeal at a pedestrian scale and proximity, contribute to a sense of public space, and reinforce the pedestrian experience. (4) Drive-through facilities and stacking lanes shall not be located along a facade of a building that faces a right-of-way. (5) Above-grade parking structures with a ground level facade visible from a right-of- way shall incorporate any combination of the following elements at the ground level: a. Retail, commercial, or office uses that occupy at least 50 percent of the building's lineal frontage along the right-of-way; or b. A l5-foot-wide strip of Type III landscaping along the base of the facade; or c. A decorative grille or screen that conceals interior parking areas from the right-of- °.. way. (6) Facades of parking structures shall be articulated above the ground level pursuant to FWCC 22-1 635(c)(1). (7) When curtain wall glass and steel systems are used to enclose a building, the glazing panels shall be transparent on 50 percent of the ground floor facade fronting a right-of-way or pedestrian area. (8) Chain-link fences shall not be allowed. Barbed or razor wire shall not be used. For non-single-family residential uses only: (9) Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(17) of this section shall apply. (d) For all residential zones. (1) Non-residential uses. Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(lO) and (a)(13) through (a)(17) of this section shall apply. (2) Non-single-family residential uses. Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(17) of this section shall apply. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) ~2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 4 MEETING DATE: July 20, 2004 ITEM# X- (i J --'.-------------"--""'----..'.'_m.m--.--.-------------------"--------'.--'""""",.,-.,.".----.----------------.--.-------------.,.--.------_.'m' --------------. ----- -------""_m.--.._.---_----_""m".'_------.-------.-----'--------_.".""m------------.--.--.--..----------.--.---- _'._._m-----------------------..-,-"------.-----------_"----""m_--..,,.-----.------,---- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Amendments to King County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Consortium Agreements Revising Joint Recommendation Committee Membership CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: r2] 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ --.--.--...m....m--.",,_..------------ ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety (PRHSPS) Committee dated July 6, 2004, including: Proposed Amendments to Community Development Block Grant Joint Agreement and the HOME Investment Partnerships Program Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with original agreements (Attachment 1); Memorandum to the Human Services Commission dated June 8, 2004, (Attachment 2) with November 8, 2003, staff report on proposed changes. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way participates in the King County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consortium and in the King County HOME Consortium. The Joint Recommendation Committee (JRC) is the recommending body created by the CDBG and HOME Agreements. The duties of the JRC include: review and recommendation to the King County Executive on all policy matters ofthe CDBG and HOME programs; approval of administrative setasides, and approval of funding decisions. The JRC is also the recommending body for the Regional Affordable Housing Program (RAHP) that was created as a result of funds from SHB 2060. The JRC previously consisted of four King County representatives and five participating city representatives. The proposed makeup of the JRC was determined based on the percentages oflow- and moderate-income residents by the various participants in the Consortiums. As proposed, the JRC would consist of three King County representatives and seven city representatives. The Joint Agreement cities of Federal Way, Renton, and Shoreline share two seats on a rotating schedule and the cities that participate only in the HOME Consortium (Auburn, Bellevue and Kent) share two seats on a rotating schedule. The remaining three city seats are appointed by the Suburban Cities Association. The proposed amendments are recommended to provide additional representation on the JRC by participating cities. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Committee moved to recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendments to the Community Development Block Grant Joint Agreement and HOME Investment Partnerships Program Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (Federal Way AG#99-l45) for the purpose of changing the composition of the Joint Recommendations Committee. PROPOSED MOTION: I move to recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendments to the Community Development Block Grant Joint Agreement and HOME Investment Partnerships Program Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (Federal Way AG#99-l45) for the purpose of changing the composition of the Joint Recommendations Committee. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~~\ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.f\ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Date: From: Via: Subject: July 6, 2004 Kelli O'Donne BG Coordinato~ David Mos I Manager Amendments King County CDBG & HOME Consortium Agreements Revising JRC Membership Background The City of Federal Way is a member of the King County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Consortiums that are administered by King County per the attached agreements. The recommending body of both the Consortiums is the Joint Recommendation Committee (JRC). The JRC has been composed of four county representatives and five cities representatives. Staff from King County and participating cities held a series of meetings to discuss potential changes to the administration of the CDBG and HOME programs in 2003. In November 2003, it was agreed to revise the membership of the JRC to better represent the Consortium. City representation was increased to seven seats and King County was reduced to three seats. The membership was distributed between the different sized participants in the programs: three members from pass-through cities and small cities; two members from joint agreement cities; and two members from HOME only cities. The proposed amendments (Attachment 1) to revise the JRC membership for the CDBG and HOME agreements are attached followed by each agreement The JRC was reconfigured in January 2004 pending the formal adoption of the amendments to the CDBG and HOME interlocal agreements. As a joint agreement city, the City of Federal Way now shares two seats with Renton and Shoreline on a rotation schedule. A joint agreement city is defined as a city that may receive a CDBG entitlement directly but chooses to participate in the King County Consortium. Council Member Burbidge has served on the JRC as a representative of a joint agreement city since January 2004. Commission Recommendation At the June 14, 2004, Human Services Commission meeting, the Commission voted unanimously to amend the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME agreements with King County to reflect the new membership of the Joint Recommendation Committee (JRC). The staff report to the Human Services Commission is also attached (Attachment 2) with background information from November 2003 for your information. ApPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: ~~... tc~~at~~ Member Committee Recommendation I move to recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendments to the Community Development Block Grant Joint Agreement and HOME Investment Partnerships Program Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (Federal Way AG#99-145) for the purpose of changing the composition of the Joint Recommendations Committee. ro('4(......-J 'L F'^-\\ Lt.)~....,.....¿1 ôr- -¡\I'l¡ 2-D ,2ÞCLj ~I~ hrL.ll ~v~Q r I yn.5.¿ /+- Committee Member tv\ . Attachment 1 AMENDMENT NO.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT JOINT AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT to the Community Development Block Grant Joint. Agreement dated August 18, 1999 is entered into by and between King County and the City of , said parties to the Agreement each being a unit of general local government in the State of Washington. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, King County and the City entered into a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Joint Agreement (the "Agreement") in 1999 for the purpose of allowing this entitlement City to participate in the King County urban countY consortium formed to receive, distribute and administer CDBG and other federal funds; and WHEREAS, there is mutual recognition of the need to amend this Agreement to increase participating cities' representation on the inter-jurisdictional Joint Recommendations Committee: NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: Paragraph VIII. A is deleted and replaced with the following new Paragraph VIII. A.: Joint Recommendations Committee Composition. The Committee shall be . composed of three (3) County representatives and seven (7) cities representatives. . The three County representatives will be King Counti Executive staff with broad policy responsibilities, and/or Department Directors, and/oielected representatives of Unincorporated Area Councils. County representatives ~hall be specified in writirig and should, where possible, be the same person consistently from meeting to meeting. The seven cities representatives will be elected officials, chief administrative officers, or persons who report directly to the chief administrative officer and who have broad policy responsibilities, e.g., planning directors, department directors, etc. Three of the seven cities representatives will be from the CDBG "Pass- through" cities and the CDBG "Small" cities, at least one from each group (the third may be from either). Two of the seven cities representatives shall be rotated among the CDBG "Joint Agreement" cities of Federal Way, Shoreline and Renton. Two of the seven cities representatives shall be rotatèd among the "HOME-only" Cities of Auburn, Bellevue and Kent, and these two representatives will vote only on issues related to the King County HOME Consortium and other regional housing-related funds (excluding CDBG). For all the rotating positions, each city will serve two years on and one year off, except that during the first year (2004) \\~L- one city in each group will serve a one-year term. Cities not serving in a position in a certain year may serve as an alternate. The rotation cycles of the two groups will be coordinated to achieve broad sub-regional representation. (The chart below sets forth the rotation schedule for the four rotating city representatives.) If any city, in accordance with HUDinstructions, notifies the County of its intent to change its status at the end of the three-year quallfication period, and as a result the number of CDBG "Joint Agreement" or "HOME-only" cities changes, County staff shall initiate a timely process to revisit the cities representation onthe JRc. Joint 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Agreement Federal Way X X X X Shoreline X X X Renton X X X HOME-only 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Kent X X X X Auburn X X X Bellevue X X X ". A-3 Paragraph VIII. B. is deleted and replaced with the following new Paragraph VIII. B.: Appointments. The King County ExecutiveshaU appoint the County representatives. The CDBG "Pass-thìough" cities and the CDBG "Small" cities will provide for the appointment of their shared representatives in a manñer to be determined by those cities through the Suburban Cities AssocÌation or other agreed mechanism for the execution of shared appointing authority. The Suburban Cities Association or other agreed mechanism will work in coordination with the "Joint Agreement" and <~HOME-only" cities to achieve broad sub-regional representation. The representatives of the revolving CDBG "Joint Agreement" cities and the representatives of the revolving "HOME-only" cities shall b~ appointed by their respective jurisdictions. Members of the Conimittee shall serve at the pleasure of their respective appointing authorities. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment. King County, Washington, a political Subdivision ofthe State of Washington City of a municipal corporation of the State of Washington By:. By: ~ignature signature printed name printed name Title: Title: Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Norm Maleng King County Prosecuting Attorney Margaret Pahl, King County ProseCuting Attorney ~ ~'-\ r (.,V V\J v 11 qt¡ /'(1? For Information only Please do not sign. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOck GRANT JOINT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between King County and the City of , ;said parties to the Agreement each being a unit of general local government in the Sþlte9fWashington. . ..,- WITNESSETH: . WHEREAS, the federal government through adoption and administration of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (the IIActll), will make Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG"), funds available to both the County and city in the form of entitlement grants; and WHEREAS, the area encompassed by unincorporated King County and any participating cities is desigl}ated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") as an urban county for the purpose 'ofreceiving CDBG funds; and WHEREAS, the Act directs HUD to distribute to each urban county the annual appropriation of CDBG funds based on the population characteristics of the urban county; and WHEREAS, the Act allows joint agreements, whereby entitlement cities may join the urban county. and allows the urban county to distribute COBG funds to such cities as participating jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the CDBO Regulations require the acceptance of the consolidated housing and community development plan ("Consolidated H&CD Plan") by participating jurisdictions; and. WHEREAS, King County will undertake CDBG-funded activities in participating incorporated jurisdictions as specified in the Consolidated H&CD Plan by granting funds to those jurisdictions to cany out such activities; and WHEREAS, King County is responsible to the federal government for all activities undertaken with CDBG funds and will ensure that all CDBG assurances and certifications King County is required to submit to HOD with the Annual Action Plan will be met; and WHEREAS, King County and the participating jurisdictions are committed tö targeting CUBa funds to ensure benefit to low- and moderate-income persons as defined by HUD; and WHEREAS, King County and its participating jurisdictions recognize that the needs of low- and moderate-income persons may cross jurisdictional boundaries and can therefore be considered regional needs; and f\-S WHEREAS, King County and the participating jurisdictions must submit an Annual Action Plan to HUD which is a requirement to receive CDBG funds; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Joint Agreement, which is entered into pursuant to and in accordance with the State Interlocal Cooperation Act, RCW Chap. 39.34, is for the City to join the urban county consortium, ("Consortium"); for planning the distribution and administration of CDBG and othér federal funds received on behalf of the Consortium from HUD, and for execution of activities in accordance with and under authority of the Act; NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES CONT AJNED HEREIN, IT IS AGREED THAT: I. GENERAL AGREEMENT King County and each participating jurisdiction agree to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, activities which further the development of viable urban communities, including the provision of decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding eConomic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income, through community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted. housing, fúnded from annual CDBG funds from federal Fiscal Years' 2000, 2001 ,and 2002 appropriations, from recaptured funds allo- cated in those years, and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds. . II. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS The distribution within the Coùnty of CDBG Funds under Title I of the Act shall be governed by the following provisions, exclusive of the Cities of Auburn, Bellevue, and Seattle. A. The amount needed for administration ofthe'Consortium's CDBG and other federal programs which benefit the Consortium shall be reserved by the County. This amount, hereinafter referred to as the administrative setaside, is. contingent upon review by the Joint Recommendations Committee ("the Committee"), as provided in . Section VIII.C. L, and approval by the Metropolitan King County Council, as provided in Section XIII.B. . B. In addition to the administrative setaside referred to in Section II (A), each year 25% of the public service funds available, not to exceed $300,000, will be subtracted from the entitlement and reserved for the Housing Stability Program, a public service activity in support of the affordable housing requirements under the implementation of the state Growth Management Act (RCW Chapter 36.70A). This public service setaside will be administered by the County with input from a working group of the 2 F\- (0 participating cities and county staff. This public service setaside will be subject to the same percentage of decrease as the annual public service funds if there are any reductions during the year. In addition, any city participating in this Joint Agreement will have the option of witliliolding their pro rata share of the Housing Stability Program funds and allocating them to a different eligible public service activity if the City so chooses. C. Of the grant amount remaining after the setasides referred to in Sections II.A.an~ n.B. (lithe Adjusted Grant Amount"), the city participating in this Joint Agreement will be eligible to receive a äirect pass-through share, provided that: 1. The City's pass-through share will be the larger of a share of the Adjusted Grant Amount based upon the CDBG Consortium's formula (the City's share of the Consortium's total low- and moderate-income persons, as defined by HUD), or the City's HUD-specified entitlement grant amount less the City's pro rata share of the Consortium's administrative setaside, and at the City's option (see n.B. above) less the City's pro rata share ofthe Housing Stability Program; 2. The City participates in developing the Consortium's Consolidated H&CD Plan by identifying its non-housing community development needs; 3. The city agrees to abide by Consortium schedules and requirements to receive a pass~through of CDBG funds. The responsibilities of. these pass-through jurisdictions are defined in Section X. Participating cities may elect not to receive a direct pass-through but may compete for County and Small Cities Funds, as defined in Section II.D., below. D. The funds remaining in the Adjusted Grant Amount after the distributionofthepass- through funds referred to in Section n.c. shall be referred to as the County and Small Cities Fund, and shall be allocated on a competitive basis to projects serving the cities not qualifying to receive or not electing to receive a pass-through, and/or projects serving the unincorporated areas of the County. E. If the monies assigned to a project during the period of this Agreement exceed the actual cost ofthe project, or if the project is later reduced or canceled, then the excess monies or recaptured funds, will be recaptured by the County and will be redistributed as follows: 1. Administrative setaside funds, as defined in Section ILA. and public service setaside as defined in Section n.B. which are recaptured shall be returned to the Consortium and be distributed to the Pass-through Cities and County and Small Cities Funds based on their percentage of the Consortium's low- and moderate- income persons, as defined by HUD. 2. Funds recaptured from a project funded through a city's pass-through fund, as defined in Section II (C), shall be returned to the City's pass-through fund, unless A--") 3 F. the City no longer qualifies for a pass-through as provided in Section H.C.I., in which case the funds shall be returned to the County and Small Cities Fund. 3. Funds recaptured from a project funded through the County and Small Cities Fund, as defined in Section lLD., shall be returned to the County and Small Cities Fund. Unallocated or .recaptured funds from 1987 and prior years (e.g., unallocated or recaptured "Population", "Needs" or "Joint" funds) shall be ~ returned to the Consortium and be distributed to the Pass-through Cities and the County and Small Cities Funds based on their percentage of the Consortium's low- and moderate- income persons, as defined by HqD. G. Funds received by a jurisdiction or CDBG subrecipient generated fTom the use of CDBG funds, hereinafter referred to as program income, shall be returned to the fund which generated the program income as follows, unless an exception is specifically recommended by the Committee and approved by the Metropolitan King County Council: 1. That portion of the program income which is interest OJ fee income generated through Community Development Interim Loan (COIL) and Section 108 loan guarantee projects (as provided in Section 108 of the Act), both of which use all or a portion of the Consortium's total available CDBG funds, shall be returned to the Consortium. The funds shall be used for the direct costs (e.g., staff, attorney, and bank fees, advertising costs, contract compliance costs), necessary for the marketing, negotiation, and implementation of the interim loan and 108 loan activities, and for othèr Consortium-wide or subregional capital projects or programs, including other Consortium-wide economic development projects or programs. Use of the funds shall be recommended by the Committee each year after review by an inter-jurisdictional staff group. 2. Program income generated fTom a project (including housing repair) funded through a city's pass-through fund, as defined in Section n.c., shall be returned to the City's pass-through fund, unless the City no Longer qualifies for a pass- through as provided in Section lLc.I., in which case the program income shall be_returned to the County and Small Cities Fund. 3. Program income gènerated from a project (including housing repair) funded through the County and Small Cities Fund, as defined in Section 11.0., shall be returned to the County and Small Cities Fund. 4. Program income generated fTom projects funded ~n 1987 (except for housing repair) and prior years shall be returned to the Consortium and be distributed to the Pass-through Cities and the County and Small Cities Funds according to their share of the Consortium's low- and moderate-income persons, as defined by HUD. . f\-ì 4 III. USE OF FUNDS: GENERAL PROVISIONS A. The County and each of the Pass-through Cities shall specify activities and projects which it will undertake with the funds described in Section II. above. B. The County and each of the Pass-through Cities shall ensure that CDBG funds are targeted to activities which can docume~t predominant (51 %) benefit to low- and moderate-income pçople and that the overall program meets or exceeds HUD's requirements for the percentage of funds spent to benefit low- and moderate-income persons in King County. C. Pass-through Cities may exchange their. CDBG funds with other Pass-through Cities for generatre.venue funds. The use of general revenue funds obtained by a Pass- through deify in this manner shall be consistent with the general intent of the community development program, but shall not be considered CDBG program mcome. D. The County and each of the Pass-through Cities shall conduct the appropriate citizen participation activities as required by HUD regulations. E. Approval of projects must be secured through formal grant applications (proposals) to King County; approval of activities shall be secured wh~~__the .annual program is approved or amended. F. General administrative còsts incurred by Pass-through Cities shall be paid for out of the pass-thròugh or from local funds. Costs incurred in administering specific projects may be included in project costs. IV. USE OF ADMINISTRATION FUNDS A. A Pass-through. City may reserve a portion of its entitlement sharé to cover administrative costs of its local CDBG Program or to fund planning projects, however, this amount must be reserved by spring ofßach year and will be based upon the City's proportion of low- and moderatè-income persons, as defined by HUD. B. In addition to the responsibilities outlined in Section X. Pass-through Cities may use additional Pass-through funds to cover part of their administrative costs if: 1. Planning ceiling (the maximum amount allowed by HOD for planning and administration activities which cannot exceed 20% of the annual entitlement plus program income) is available; 2. The City runs a competitive process for the distribution ofthe CDBG funds; and ~-\ 5 3. City. staff participate in Consortium-wide planning proèesses such as development of the Consolidated H&CD Plan and the HOME Consortium Working Group. C. Requests from Pass-through Cities to use the balance of planning ceiling, if available, to cover additional administrative costs will take priority over requests for planning projects. D. Pass-through City staff who are supported with administrative funds would also be expected to assist in preparing and/or presenting information to the Committee. V. USE OF PUBLIC SERVICE FUNDS A Pass-through City may reserve a portion of its entitlement share to cover public service activities; however, the amount must be reserved by spring of each year and will be based upon the City's proportion oflow- and moderate-income persons, as defined by ROO. VI. PROGRAM INCOME A. The participating jurisdiction must inform King County of any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds received by the participating jurisdiction: B. Any such program income is subject to requirements set forth in Section II.G. of this Agreement. C. Any program income the participating jurisdiction is authorized to retain may only be used for eligible activities in accordance with all applicable CDBG requirements. D. King County has the responsibility for monitoring and reporting to HOO on the use of any such program income and thereby requires appropriate record keeping and reporting by the participating jurisdiction as stated in the signed certification to receive "Pass-through City" status and in each city's contract to receive CDBG planning and administration funds. E. In the event of close-out or change in status of the participating jurisdiction any . program income that is on hand or received subsequent to the close-out or change in status shall be paid to King County Consortium. VII. REAL PROPERTY A. Participating jurisdictions owning community facilities acquired or improved in whole or in part with CDBG funds must comply with change of use restrictions as required by IÍUD and the policies adopted by the Conunittee as found in the Consolidated H&CD Plan. 6 r\- \-0 B. The participating jurisdiction must notify King County prior to any modification or change in the use of real property acquired or improved in whole or in part with CDBG funds. This includes any modification or change in use tfom that planned at the time of the acquisition or improvement, including disposition. C. The jurisdiction shall reimburse King County in an amount equal to the current fair market value (less any portion thereof attributable to expenditures of non-CDBG funds) of property acquired or improved with CDBG funds that is sold or transferred for a use which does not qualify under the CDBG regulations. D. Program income generated fTom the disposition or transfer of property prior to or subsequent to the close-out, change of status, or termination of the cooperation agreement between the County and the parti<?ipating jurisdiction shall be subject tò the requirements set forth in Section II.G. and Section VL VIII. JOINT RECOMMENDATIONS COMMITfEE A Joint Recommendations Committee shall be established. A. Composition. The Committee shaH be composed of four County representatives and five Cities representatives. Thè four County representatives may be Department Directors or their designees, and/or citizen representatives fTom unincorporated communities. County representatives shall be specified in wótingand should, where possible, be the same person consistently from meeting to meeting. The five partici- pating city representatives and their alternates will include city planning directors or comparable level staff, or elected officials. Two city representatives and their alternates will be fTom the north/east region of the County and two city representatives and their alternates will be from the south region of the County. An additional revolving position on this Committee shall be rotated between the HOME- only cities of Auburn and BeUevue. The revolving position wilÏ be non-voting, except on issues related to the King County HOME Consortium and other federal housing-related funds (excluding CDBG). B. Appointments. The King County Executive shall appoint the four County representatives (no more than one representative for each unincorporated community or Department). The Suburban Cities Association will select eight different jurisdictions, four to serve as members and four as alternates, who in turn, will assign representatives to this Committee. Terms of office shall be for two years. Priority. for one of the positions will be for a small city representative. The revolving HOME . position will be appointed annually by the respective jurisdiction. Members of the Committee shaH serve at the pleasure of their respective appointing authorities. The chairperson and vice-chairperson of the Committee shall b~ chosen from among the members of the Committee by a majority vote of the members for a term of one A-\\ 7 year beginning the first meeting of the calendar year. Attendance of five members will constitute a quorum. C. Powers and Duties, The Committee shall be empowered to: 1. Review and recommend to the King County Executive all policy matters on the Consortium's CDBG and HOME Program including the amount of administrative setaside, priorities governing the use of the public services setaside, and projects or programs to be funded with the program income fTom community development interim loans and Section 108 loan guarantees (as allowed in Section 108 of the Act). 2. Review, recommend, and endorse the Consolidated H&CD Plan required by HOD. 3. Review plan and program disagreements between the County and participating jurisdictions and offer recommendations to the King County Executive. 4. Review and recommend sanctions to be imposed on cities for failure to meet respo~ibilities as contained in Section X of this Agreement. Any recommended sanctions will ensure that. the City's low- and moderate-income residents continue to benefit fTom CDBG funds. Sanctions will be imposed to prevent the King County Consortium ,from losing a share of its entitlement due to participating cities' inability to meet federal requirements. 5. Review and recommend projects for funding under the Section 108 loan guarantee program (as allowed in Section 108 of the Act). 6. Review and recommend projects for funding ITom the remainder of any new Pass-through City's funds if that new Pass-through City chooses to take only a partial pass-through as provided in Section II.CA. above. . IX. RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF THE KING COUNTY HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM STAFF . Those King County Housing and Community Development Program Staff positions which are funded through the administrative setaside, hereinafter referred to as the Staff, serve as staffto all Consortium partners and the Committee and provides liaison between the Consortium and HUD. A. Responsibilities to the Joint Recommendations Committee. The Staff shall: 1. Solicit and present to the Committee all applicable federal and County policy guidelines, special conditions, and formal requirements related to the preparation of the Consolidated H&CD Plan, and related to administration of the programs under these plàns. 8 f\- \~ 2. Prepare and present written materials required by HUD and the Metropolitan King County Council as components of the Consolidated H&CD Plan to be prepared pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to: collection and analysis of data; identification of problems, needs and their locations; development of long and short term objectives; consideration of alternative strategies; and preparation ofthe administrative budget. 3. Prepare and present to the Committee policy evaluation reports or recommendations, and any other material deemed necessary by the Committee to help the Committee fulfill its powers and duties. 4. Collaborate with city staff working groups and present to the Committee specific sanctions to be imposed on cities which fail to meet their responsibilities as contained in Section X and as contained in specific annual agreements. B. Responsibilities to Jurisdictions Which are Parties to This Agreement. The County will develop strategic plans which will identify housing and community development needs and objectives to address high priority needs in the balance of the County in accordance with the primary goals and requirements of the Act. The Consolidated H&CD Plan, including the housing and community development objectives will meet the HUD requirement for a Community Development Plan. The objectives and any local program criteria outlined within the Consolidated H&CD Plan will be consistent with local comprehensive plans being developed under the Growth Management Act. The Staff shall: 1. Prepare and present to the King County Executive and Council material necessary for the approval of the County and Small Cities portion of the annual program. 2. Present to the Metropolitan King County Council the Consortium's annual program for adoption. 3. Distribute to participating jurisdictions, prior to any Joint Recommendations Committee decision based upon it, information concerning proposals having implications for Consortium-wide funding as provided in Section ILG.1. above. . The County will incorporate jurisdictions' feedback in materials forwarded to the Joint Recommendations Committee or Metropolitan King County Council. 4. Provide regular written reports outlining the outcomes and costs of the Consortium wide Housing Stability and economic development programs such that this inforn1ation is available for participating jurisdictions' review and comment prior to the Joint Recommendations Committee's decisions on the programs' budgets for the following year, and provide quarterly status reports to the Pass-through Cities on those housing repair programs and capital projects which the County is administering on behalf of the Pass-through Cities. 9 f\-ß 5. 6. 7. Administer the Consortium's CDBG Program: . help to identify needs in communities; . provide assistance in inte¡:preting HUD regulations; provide technical assistance to cities as necessary to enable them to meet their responsibilities as partners to the Agreellient;- assist in the development of viable CDBG proposals; review aU proposals for CDBG funding; . . . . inform participating jurisdictions in a timely way of the amount of capital dollars available for distribution regionally and the requirements regarding eligibility for them. . develop contracts for funded projects in a timely fashion; public (human) services programs have a high priority and will receive authorization to proceed within 15 working days of the beginning of the program year if all relevant information needed to prepare the contract has been submitted; monitor subrecipient and city-funded projects; . . . monitor and enforce compliance with the federal wage and relocation requirements; . reimburse aU eligible cosh; . prepare and submit required documents and reports to HUD; and . provide overSight of the CDBG. Consortium to ensure compliánce with aU federal. requirements. . Upon. request by a Pass4hrough City, staff will develop, administer, and implement a city's CDBG-funded contract. Additionally, multi.:.jurisdictional projeCts funded by King Countyandlor one or more cities will be:qeyeloped and implemented by Staff. .. King (;;oÜnty shall detennine, with.the advice of representatives from small cities, the use of the County and Small Cities Funds in a manner consistent with the Consolidated H&CD Plan including its local program criteria. x. RESPONSIBILITIES AND POWERS OF PASS-THROUGH CITIES In order to receive a direct share of the entitlement, Pass-through Cities participating in this Agreement shall have the following responsibilities and powers: A. Pass-through City Councils may adopt local program criteria which will address community development and housing needs in coordination with the Consortium's timeline for consolidated planning effort and which will be consistent with federal 10 f\~ )i requirements, Consortium-wide policies and local comprehensive plans being developed under the Growth Management Act. B. Notify the County of the citizen participation activities undertaken by local jurisdic- tions as well as any changes made by the jurisdiction to funded CDBG activities in a timely manner as referenced under Section ID(D). C. Each Pass-through City shall exercise local discretion in determining the use of its pass-through funds in a manner that (1) is consistent with the Consolidated H&CD Plan, (2) recognizes the federal requirement at 24 CFR Part 570.2 that a minimum of 70% of the funds' be spent on activities benefiting primarily low and moderate income persons, and (3) is in accordance with the Consortium's schedule for . submission to HUD. D. City legislative bodies shall approve or disapprove via motion or resolution all CDBG activities, locations, and budgets submitted by Pass-through City staff. Notice of these actions are to be forwarded to the County in a timely manner. E. Pass-through City staff shall review aU project proposals for consistency with federal threshold requirements and Consortium-wide policies prior to submission to the County, and ensure that all relevant inforrilation necessary to prepare. a còntract is submitted to the County in a timely manner. . : F. Pass-through City staff shall assist in the development of the Consortium-wide Consolidated H&CD Plan which includes housing and other community development needs, resources, objectives, and adopted. projects. G. Pass-through City staff shall implement CDBG-funded projects within the program year and submit both vouchers and required reportS to the County in a complete and timely manner. . . ..- , H. Pass-through City staff shall participate in ôther Consortium-wide planningac~iv!ties such as HOME policy development and monitoring ~he Housing Stability Pro~am, I. . Pass.-through City staff shall collaborate with County staff working group a~dpresent to the Committee specific sanctions to be imposed on cities which fail tömeet their responsibilities as contained in this section and as contained in specific annual agreements. J. Each Pass-through City shall examine its role in recognizing and addressing regional or Consortium-wide needs and may participate in a coordinated funding approach with other juris~ictions and the County to serve their residents. f\-LS II XI. RESPONSIBILITIES OF OTHER CONSORTIUM CITIES Other Consortium cities must apply for funds through the annual County and Small Cities application process. The Small Cities shall: A. Coordinate with County Staff in identifying community development needs and local program criteria for addressing them. B. Prepare applications for CDBG funds to address local needs. C. Obtain city council authorization for proposed projects. D. Carry out funded projects in a timely manner. XII. RESPONSIBILITIES OF ALL PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS A. Each participating jurisdiction shall fulfill to the. County's satisfaction all relevant requirements of federal laws and regulations which apply to King County as applicant, including assurances and certifications described in Section XN(D). B. Each participating jurisdiction or cooperating unit of general local government has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights ,de:mQnstrations;and '2. A policy enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring . entrance to or exit ITom ~ fàcility or location which is the subject of non-violent ,civil rights demonstrations within jurisdictions. C. Pu~s':lant to 24 CFR 57050 1 (b); all participating units,of local government are subj~tjo the same requiremen~ applicable to subrecipients~exéluding the County's. 'Minority and Women Business Enterprises requiremerits. The applicable requirements include, but are not limited to, a written agreement with the County whièh complies with 24 CFR 570503 and includes provisions pertaining to the following items: statement of work; records and reports; program income; uniform administrative items; other program requirements; conditions for religious organizations; suspension and termination; andreversion of assets. D. All participating units of local government understand that they may not apply for grants under the federal Small Cities or State CI)BG Programs which receive separate entitlements from HUD during the period of participation in this Agreement. Consortium cities which do not receive a direct pass-through of CDBG funds may apply for grants under the County and Small Cities Fund. 12 f\-)~ E. All units of local government participating in the CDBG urban county through this agreement understand that they are also part of the urban county for the HOME program, and may partic!pate in.a HOME program only through the urban county. XIII. RESPONSIBILITIES AND POWERS OF KING COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE CONSORTIUM . . King County shall have the following responsibilities and powers: A. The Metropolitan King County Council shall have authority and responsibility for all policy matters, including the Consolidated H&CD Plan, upon review and recom- mendation by the Committee. B. The Metropolitan King County Council shall have authority am! responsibility for all fund allocation matters, including the approval of the annual administrative setaside and the approval and adoption of the Consortium~s annual CDBG Prògram. C. The King County Executive shall have the authority and responsibility to approve requested changes to the adopted annual CDBG Program in the following circumstances: 1. The requested change is to ä Pass.:.through Citýs portion of the adopted annual program, and the change is rèquested by the legislative body of the Pass-through City; or 2. The requested change is in the County and ~Small Cities portion of the adopted annüal progrãm, ,and it is limited to a change of project scope or change of projeetimplementor in a specific project, and it is requested by the subrecipient, and thecþ.ange is made in consultation with the Councilmember in whose ~istrict thêpmject is located.' " . D. The King County, Executive, as'administrato! of this CDBG Progra~,shåll have authority-arid responsibility for all admiriistråtive J;equirements for whíChtl1e County is responsible to the federal government. . E.' The King County Executive shall have authority and responsibility for all fund control and disbursements. F. Notwithstanding any other provision contained in this Agreement, the County as the , applicant for CDBG funds has responsibility for and assumes all obligations as the applicant in the execution of this CDBG Program, including final responsibility for selecting activities and annually subrnitting Action Plans with HUD. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as an abdication of those responsi- bilities and obligations. ¥\-\\ 13 XIV. GENERAL TERMS A. This Agreement shall extend through the 2000, 200 I, and 2002 program years, and will remain in effect until the CDBG funds and program income received with respect to activities carried out during the three-year period are expended and the funded activities completed. This agreement will be automatically renewed for participation in successive three-year qualification periods, unless the County or the City provides written notice that it elects not to participate in the new qualification period by the date set forth by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in subsequent Urban County Qualification Notices. King County, as the official applicant, shall have the authority and responsibility to ensure that any property acquired or assisted with CDBG funds is disposed of or used in accordance with, federal regulations. B. Pursuant to 24 CFR .Part 570.307(d)(2), during the period of qualification no included unit of general local goveri1ment may terminate or withdraw from the agreement while it remains in effect. C. It is understood that by signing this Agreement the jurisdictions shall agree to comply with the policies and implementation of the Consolidated H&CD Plan. ' D. Parties to this Agreement must take all required actions necessary to assure compliance with King County's certification required by Section 1 04(b) of Title [ of the Housing and Conimunity Development Act of1974, as amended, including Title , VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, (Titl~ III of the Civil Rights Act), the Fair , ,Housing Act as amended, Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community - ¿Development Act of 1974; as,amended, the AmericanswithDisabilities Act of 1990, , and other applicable laws. " E. No CDBG funds shall be expended for activities in, ocin support of any participatin~ " city that does not affirmatively further fair housing withirLits own jurisdiction or t{lät impedes the County's actÌgns to comply with its fair housing certification. ' E . ' It is recognized that äm~Ildment of the provisions ofJh~s Agreement may become' ~ : necessary, and such amendment shall take placê'whèn , aU parties have execut~ä " , written addendum to this'Agreement. The City,@.dtlie,County agree to'adópt- allY amendments to the agreement incorporating changes necessary to meet the requirements for cooperâtionagreements set forth in an Urban County Qualification , Notice applicable for a subsequent three-year qualification period, and to submit such amendment to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Failure' to adopt such amendment will void the automatic renewal of such qualification period. G. Calculations for determining the number of low- and moderate-income persons residing in the County and cities shall be based upon official HUD approved 1990 Census data, and on the official annual estimates of populations of cities, towns and 14 ~-\~ communities published by the State of Washington Office of Program Planning and Fiscal Management. ,H. Participating jurisdictions shall be considered to be those jurisdictions which have signed this Agreement. 1. Jurisdictions undertaking activities and/or projects with CDBG funds distributed under this Agreement retain full civil and criminal liability as though these funds were locally generated. J. King County retains environmental review responsibility for purposes of fulfilling requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, under which King County may require the local incorporated jurisdiction or contractor to furnish data, information, and assistance for King County's review and assessment in determining whether King County mûSt prepare an Environmental Impact Statement. K. Jurisdictions retain responsibility in fulfilling the ,requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act under which King County has review responsibility only. CITY OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Signature of Chief Executive Officer . for Ron Sims, County Executive Name and, Title (printed) Date: ,Date: .' A~L~ 15 AMENDMENT NO.1 HOME INVESTMENT P ARTNERSIDPS PROGRAM INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT to the HOME Investment Partnerships Program Interlocal Cooperation Agreement dated August 18, 1999 is entered into by and between King County and the City of , said parties to the Agreement each being a unit of general local government in the State of Washington. WITNESSETH: /' WHEREAS, King County and the City entered into a HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) interlocal cooperation agreemént (the «Agreement") in 1999 for the purpose of forming a HOME consortium and undertaking HOME Program housing activities; and WHEREAS, there is mutual recognition of the need to amend this Agreement to increase participating cities' representation on the inter-jurisdictional Joint Recommendatìons Committee: ' NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: Paragraph 10 is deleted and replaced with the following new ParagTaph 10: Joint Recommendations Committee Çomposition. The Committee shall be composed of three (3) County representatives and seven (7) cities representatives. The three'County representatives will be King County Executive staff with broad policy responsibilities, and/or Department Directors, and/or elected representatives of Unincorporated Af(~a Councils. County representatives shall be specified in writing and should, where possible, be the same person consistently from meeting to meeting. The seven cities representatives will be elected officials, chief administrative officers, or persons who report directly to the chief administrative officer and who have broad policy responsibilities, e.g., planning directors, department directors, . etc. Three of the seven cities representatives will be from the CDBG "Pass- through" cities and the CDBG "Small" cities, at least one from each group (the third may be from either). Two of the seven cìties representatives shall be rotated ' among the CDBG "Joint Agreement" cities of Federal Way, Shoreline(and Renton. Two of the seven cities representatives shall be rotated among the "HOME-only" Cities of Auburn, Bellevue and Kent, and these two representatives will vote only on issues related to the King County HOME Consortium and other regional housing-related funds (excluding CDBG). For all the rotating pdsitions, each city will serve two years on and one year off, except that during the first year (2004) one city in each group will serve a one-year term. Cities not serving in a position in f\- ?-Õ a certain year may serve as an alternate. The rotation cycles ofthe two groups will be coordinated to achieve broad sub-regional representation. (The chart below sets forth the rotation schedule for the four rotating city representatives.) If any city, in accordance with HUD instructions, notifies the County of its intent to change its statu.s at the end of the three-year qualification period, and as a result the number of CDBG "Joint Agreement" or "HOME-only" cities changes, County staff shall initiate a timely process to revisit the cities representation on the JRC. . Joint 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Agreement Federal Way X X X X Shoreline X X X Renton X X X HOME-only 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Kent X X X X Auburn X X X Bellevue X X X ~- 2) Paragraph II is deleted an4 replaced with the following new Paragraph 11: Appointments. The King County Executive shall appoint the County representatives. The CDBG "Pass-through" cities and the CDBG "Small" cities will provide for the appointment of their shared representatives in a manner to be . determined by those citiès through the Suburban Cities Association or other agreed mechanism for the execution of shared appointing authority. The Suburban Cities Association or other agreed mechanism will work in coordination with the "Joint Agreement" ~nd"HOME-only" cities to achieve broad sub-regional representation. The representatives of the revolving CDBG "Joint Agreement" cities and the representatives of the revolving "HOME-only" cities shall be appointed by their respective jurisdictions. Members of the Committee shall serve at the pleaSure of their respective appointing authorities. , IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment. King County, Washington, a political Subdivision of the State of Washington City of a municipal corporation of the State of Washington By: By: signature signature printed name printed name Title: Title: Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Norm Maleng King County Prosecuting Attorney Margaret Pahl, King County Prosecuting Attorney f\- L- L , ~ ç:u) (+(ýtþ For Information only Please do not sign. HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM - INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT . . THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between King County, an urban county pursuant to 24 CFR Subpart 92.101 and Subpart 570.3, hereinafter referred to ,as the "County, II and the City of - hereinafter referred to as the "City," said parties to the Agreement each being a unit of general local government of the State of Washington. ' RECIT ALS WHEREAS, a unit of general local government that is included in an urban county may be part of a HOME consortium only through the urban county; and . WHEREAS, a metropolitan city or an urban county may be part ofaconsortium; and WHEREAS,' the City and King County agree that it is mutually desirable and beneficial to enter into a consortium arrangement pursuant to and authorized by 24 CFR Part 92 and 42 USC § 12746 for purposes of the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, hereinafter referred to as "HOME Program"; . NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES CONTAINED HEREIN, IT IS AGREED THAT: 1. This Agreement is made pursuant to the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, as amend~, 42 USC § 12701 et. seq. (the "Act") and RCW 39.34, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act. 1. The City and the County agree to cooperate to undertake or assist in undertaking HOME Program housing assistance activities which are eligible under 24 CFR Part 92. 3. The- County is hereby authorized to act as the representative member on behalf of the Consortium for the purposes of the HOME Program. The County agrees to assume overall responsibility for ensuring that the Consortium's HOME Program is carried out in compliance with federal requirements and the housing objectives ofthe City and the County as adopted in -the Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan (Consolidated H&CD Plan). ¥\-?- S The City agrees to cooperate fully with the County in the development and preparation of the Consolidated H&CD Plan, and tö prepare and provide those elements specifically pertaining to the City. 4. This Agreement shall remain in full force and, effect for the period necessary to plan and carry . out all activities that will be funded from HOME funds awarded for the 2000,2001, and 2002 federal fiscal years, the three.;year qualification period that coincides with the Agreement for the Distribution and Administration of Community Development Block Grant, or until the County's designation as a participating HOME jurisdiction or an urban county is rescinded by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, whichever is shorter. This agreement will be automatically renewed for participation in successive three-year qualification periods, unless the County or the City provides written notice it elects not to participate in the new qualification period. Stich written notice shall be given by the date set forth in an Urban County Qualification Notice applicable to subsequent three-year qualification periods and provided by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. . 5. The City and the County agree to adopt any amendments to the agreement incorporating changes necessary to meet the requirements for cooperation agreements set forth in an Urban County Qualification Notice applicable for a subsequent three~year qualification period, and to submit such amendment to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Failure to adopt such amendment will void the automatic renewal of such qualification period. 6. During the term of this Agreement, neither the County nor the City may withdraw from participation from their respective obligations under this Agreement. 7. By executing the HOME Agreement, the City understands that it may not participate in a HOME consortium except through the urban county, regardless of whether the urban county receives a HOME formula allocation. 8. This Agreement shall be executed in three counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, by the chief executive officers of the County and the City, pursuant to the authority granted them by their respective governing bodies. One of the signed counterparts, accompanied by copies of the authorizing resolutions, from the County and the City, shall be filed by the County with the Region X office of HUD. A copy shall be filed with the Secretary of State and the Clerk of the King County Council, the County Auditor, and the City pursuant to RCW 39,34.040. 9. The County and the City both hereby agree to affirn1ativelyfurther fair housing. 2 ~2-~ 10. Joint Recommendations Committeç Composition. The Committee shall be compösed of four, County representatives and five Cities representatives. The four County representatives may be Department Directors or their designees, and/or citizen representatives of unincorporated communities. County representatives shall be specified in writing and should, where , possible, be the same person consistently from meeting to meeting. Five participating city representatives and their alternates will include city planning directorS or col1lparable level staff, or elected officials. Two cIty representatives and their alternates will be from the north/east region of the County and two city representatives and their alternates will be from the south region of the County. An additional revolving position on this Committee shall be rotated between the HOME-only Cities of Auburn and BeUevue, The revolving position will be non-voting, except on issues related to the King County HOME Consortium and other federal housing-related funds (excluding Community Development Block Grant). 11. Appointments. The King County Executive shall appoint the County representatives. The Suburban Cities Association will select eight different jurisdictions, four to serve astnembers and four as alternates, which in turn, will assign representatives to this Committee. Termsof office. shall be for two years. Priority for one of the positions will be for a small city representative. The revolving HOME position will be appointed annually by the respective jurisdiction. Members of the Committee shall serve at the pleasure of their respective appointing authorities. 12. The Joint RecoÍnmendations Committee willado-pt HOME program policies, consistent with the Consolidated H&CO Plan, developed by the City and County staff working group. The Joint Recommendations Committee will approve funding decisions. All funding decisions must be in accord with adopted policies. Once the policies are adopted, the City, as a representative member of the Consortium, shall also have the right. to comment on any program changes prior to their implementation by the County. 13. The chairperson and vice-chairperson of the Joint Recommendations Committee shall be chosen from among the members of the Committee by a majority vote of the members for a term of one year beginning the first meeting of the calendar year. Attendance of five members will constitute a quorum. 14. The City shall participate jointly with the County in the development oftÞe Consortium's HOME Program by partkipating in development of a HOME Program strategy sufficient to accommodate both the collective and individual housing 'objectives contained within, local comprehensive plans or other adopted plans of both the City and the County. 15. Federal HOME funds, allocated to the Consortium, shall be used to fund housing assistance activities that are the subject of this Agreement. The City and the County shall cooperate In 1\-z¿:, 3 the establishment of budgets for separate HOME activities. The County intends to enter into contractual agreements with any city, nonprofit organization, or other entity that it selects to implement HOME activities. The Countýs administrative costs will be paid from the HOME grant, after review and approval by the Joint Recommendations Committee. 16. This agreement applies to the Consortium's acceptance of other federal housing-related funds which may be allocated by formula to the Consortium. Allocation decisions for these funds will be subject to policies and procedures developed by the City and County staff working group and adopted by the Joint Recommendations _Committee. This Agreement is legally binding and valid upon signature of all parties. CITY OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Signature of Chief Ekecutive Officer for Ron Sims, County Executive Name and Title (printed) Date: Date: 4 '}\-ZJo " . .. ~ CITYOF fill' 7 Federal Way ~. MEMORANDUM DATE: June 8, 2004 - TO: Human Services Commission. ~ FROM: Kelli O'Donnell, CDBG Coordinato SUBJECT: . Amendments to the Interlocal Agf . ments for HOME and CDBG Background: The City of Federal Way is a member of the King County CDBG and HOME ' Consortiums that are administered by King County. The recommending body of the Consortiums is the Joint Recommendation Committee (JRC). As was reported at the November 7, 2003, Human Services Commission meeting (Attachment 1 )-, staff from King County and the cities in the King County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) consortium agreed to make changes to the composition of the Joint Recommendation Committee to increase the representation by participating cities. These changes were implemented in February of 2004 and Council Member Jeanne Burbidge has been serving on the JRC representing the Joint Agreement cities. Attachment 2 includes the existinginterlocal agreements with the proposed amendments. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of the amendments to the Community Development Block Grant Joint Agreement and HOME Investment Partnerships Program Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for the purpose of changing the composition of the Joint Recommendations Committee, Proposed Motion: . I move to recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendments to the Community Development Block Grant Joint Agreement and HOME Investment Partnerships Program Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (Federal Way AG#99-145) for the purpose of changing the composition of the Joint Recommendations Committee. Please contact me at (253) 661-4153 or kellio@fedway.org if you have any questions regarding this item. . , , ' f\.-;Z l ~ OTY OF' -'" Federal Way MEMORANDUM DATE: November?,2003 TO: Human Services Commission - ~L FROM: Kelli O'Donnell, CDBG Coordinatw..R"'"" . SUBJECT: . . Composition of the Joint Recommendation Committee Štaff from King County and the cities in the King County Community Development Bloçk Grant (CDBG) consortium have been meeting since the faU of 2002. The purpose of the meetings were to review the CDBG program see if changes could be made to keep the administrative costs at a reasonable level. In 2003, the annual CDBG allocation forthe King County consortium increased by 12%. The Human Services Commission was updated on potential changés to the HOME and CDBG programs to keep administrative costs by King County from rising. These changes are outlined in the attached May 13, 2003; memorandum to the Human Services Commission. Composition of the Joint Recommendation Committee: During discussion of potential changes to the program, the issue of the composition of the.Joint Recommendation Committee (JRC) was re-openeddue to the withdrawal of Kent from the CDBG Consortium. - The JRC currently consists of four County representatives and five participating city representatives. The five participating city representatives must have two from the north/east region of the County .and two city representatives from the south region of the County. The remaining city representative position on the JRC is rotated between the HOME-only cities of Auburn and Bellevue. The HOME- only position is excluded from voting on Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), since they are not part of the CDBG Consortium. Since Kent was no longer part of the CDBG Consortium, the composition of the JRC needed to be amended. With the addition of Kent as a HOME-only city, Bellevue did not wish to have athree-year rotation to sit on the JRC. The cities of Federal Way, Renton, and Shoreline (Joint Agreement cities) did not feel it was representative to have the positions on the JRC increased for the HOME-only cities without equity for the entitlement cities that were remaining in the CDBG Consortium. After lengthy discussion amongst participating cities and King County, the composition of the JRC was revised based on the low- and moderate-income residents in the County with seats designated to HOME-only cities and Joint Agreement cities based upon their proportionate share of low- and moderate-income residents. The rotation schedules below were coordinated to provide subregional representation from the north and east. Consensus has been reached amongst county and city staff on the following: ~ 3 County representatives appointed by Executive (previously 5) ~ 3 representatives of regular CDBG & HOME Consortium, appointed by SCA. At least one of the appointments must be a pass-through city and one a small city, and the remaining one can be either. SCA will consider subregional balance when making appointments. ~ 2 representatives of CDBG Joint Agreement/HOME cities, to be rotated on the following schedule. \\-2--~ ~ 2 representatives of HOME-only cities, to be rotated on the following schedule Joint Agreement JRC Position 1 ~ Joint Agreement JRC Position 2 Federal Way 200412005 2010/2011 2016/201 I 2007/2008 2013/2014 2019/2020 7 ~ ¡ Shoreline 2006/2007 2012/2013 2018/201 I 2004 2009/2010 2015/201q 9 ~ i Renton 2008/2009 2014/2015 2020/202 I 2005/2006 2011/2012 2017/2018 . 1 a a . Kent HOME-Onl' JRC Position 1 .1 HOME-Onh JRC Position 2 2004/2005 2010/2011 2016/201 1200712008 2013/20142019/2020 7 .1. . 2006/2007 2012/2013 2018/201 12004 20091201.02015/2616 9 '. . I .. 200812009 2014/2015 2020/20212005/2006 201.1/2012 2017/2018 1 I Auburn Bellevue Cities not serving in a Joint Agreement or HOME-Only position in a certain year will aetas the alternate for their respective position. Joint Recommendation Committee Duties: The JRC is the recommending body to the Metropolitan King County Council with the following duties: Communi!ï.Pevelopment Bloc~ Grant Consortium: . . 1. Review and recommend to the King County Executive all policy matters on the Consortium's CDBG and HOME Program including the amount of administrative setaside, priorities governing the use. of the public services setaside, and projects or programs to be funded with the program income from community development interim loans and Section 108 loan guarantees (as allowed in Section 1.08 of the Act). 2. Review, recommend, and endorse the Consolidated H&CD Plan required by HUD. 3. R."eview plan and program disagre~ments between the County and participating jLlrisdictions and offer recommendations to the King County Executive. . 4. ~eview and recommend sanctions t.o be imposed on cities for failure to meet responsibilities as contained in Section X of this Agreement. Any recommended sanctions will ensure that the City's low- and moderate-income residents continue to benefit from CDBG funds. Sanctions will. be imposed. to prevent the King County Consortium from losing a share of its entitlement due to participating cities' inability to meet federal requirements. . 5. Review and recommend projects for funding under the Section 108 loan guarantee program (as allowed in Section 108 of the Act). 6. Review and recommend projects for funding from the remainder of any new Pass- through City's funds if that new Pass-through City chooses to take only a partial pass- through as provided in Section ILCA. above. ~-2-1 - HOME Consortiúm Duties: 1. The Joint Recommendations Committee will adopt HOME program policies, consistent with' the Consolidated H&CD Plan, developed by the City and County staff working group. The Joint Recommendations Committee will approve funding decisions. All funding decisions must be in accord with adopted policies. Once the policies are adopted, the .City, as a representative member of the Consortium, shall also have the right to comment on any program changes prior to their implementation by the County. Regional Affordable Housing Program Duties: 1. The JRC shall be the body that reviews and adopts annual RAHP fund allocations and related allocation polices, consistent with the King County Council-adopted'RAHP Guidelines, the Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plans of the King County Consortium and the City of Seattle, ~nd other local housing plans, as qpplicable. The membership of the JRC, as authórized by the CDBG and HOME Agreements, and as defined herein, shall be expanded to include an appointment from the City of Seattle. The Seattle JRC representative will attend meetings that con~rn the SHB 2060 fund and will be entitled to vote solely on SHB 2060 issues and not on other King County Consortium matters coming before the JRC. The Seattle representative shaff be an elected official, department director or comparable level ~~ . December Meeting of the Joint Recommendation Committee: The changes to the membership of the JRCand the changes to the CDBG program in the attached memorandum will be accomplished by amendments to thè CDBG Joint Agreement and the HOME Interlocal Agreement. King County is expected to forward these agreements to the participating cities in the near future for consideration. The Joint Recommendation Committee will be considering the ,first allocations of the Regional Affordable Housing Program (HB 2060) funds at their December 4 meeting- Cities have been asked to make the new appointments to JRC positions now so that the new positiQns can give input into this funding decision. Staff will be working with the City Manager to fill Federal Way's position on the JRC. Please contact me at (253) 661-4153 or kellio@fedway.org if you have any questions regarding the report or any CDBG projects or programs. f\ - ~Ð MEETING DATE: ]u]y 20, 2004 ]TKM# JL(' ) -~U CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SlJHJECT: Community Center 2%-For-Art Conceptual Artwork Proposal, Themes and Concepts CAT~:GORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLlJTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANC~= 0 l>lJHLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Am": Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee Action Form dated July ]2,2004; Community Center 2%-For-Art Conceptual Artwork Proposal, Themes and Concepts SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: On May 18,2004 Council approved the Community Center 2% for Art selection of the Exterior Artist, Interior Artist and Artist Made Building Parts Program management. The Artist se1ected for the Exterior artwork program is Bruce Meyers, the Interior Artist and manager of the Artist Made Bui1ding Parts Program is Laura Sindell. The Arts Commission unanimous1y voted to approve the 2% for Community Center Artwork Proposal, Themes and Concepts and forward to City Council for authorization to proceed. A presentation of additional information, themes and concepts will occur at the Council Committee meeting. CITY COIJNCIL COMMITTKE RECOMMENDATION: Motion to recommend a "do pass" to approve the 2% for Art Community Center conceptual artwork proposa1, and authorize artists to move forward into final design and place before City Council on July 20, 2004 for approval. ]>ROJ>OSED MOTION: "] move approval of the Community Center 2%-For-Art Conceptual Artwork Proposal, Theme and Concepts as presented". .......... . ...... ..... .......... '............. ........ .. ........ ......... ........... ............. ...... .... .... CITY MANAGER AI>I>ROV AL: ~ ~~~... -~~o.~~.......'.~~'. .~.......~.~.~~-~~- .._~~'.--'-~~n~.~~~._~~~.~....~..-_n (BELOW TO BE COMPLE11<.,ïJ BY C1TY CLERKS OJ<ïqCE) --. ---.- ---- --_. .-- n --.-- ----.. -.--. -_no COUNCIL ACTION: D A]>]>ROVED 0 DENJE]) 0 TAHLE])/DEFERRE])/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL UlLL # 1 S1' reading _._.~ Enactment reading ----- ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # -~--- ___n- - - -.-.--. ..--..-- ._-_._._-_._-_..--...._-~-_. Cjß CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: July] 2, 2004 PRHSPS Council Committee Mary Faber, ion and Cultural Services Superintendent David Mo e tanager Community Ce ter-2% for Art Conceptual Artwork Proposal, Themes and Concepts Backeround: On May 18, 2004 Council approved the Community Center 2% for Art selection of the Exterior Artist, Interior Artist and Artist Made Building Parts Program management. The Artist selected for the Exterior artwork program is Bruce Meyers, the Interior Artist and manager of the Artist Made Building Parts Program is Laura Sinden. Conceptual Artwork Proposal Research and Development: Project Budget: $114,500 The Artists made visits to the Project site to identify important aspects of the built and cultural environment. They took steps to ensure a good working understanding of the project site, the goals and mission ofthe Center, program plans, Federal Way population demographics, cultural history and facility constituents. The Artists conducted independent research to develop concepts and opportunities for the integration of artwork; and they discussed these concepts with the design team, City representatives and the Art Coordinator. The Artists have attended design charrettes along with introduction and coordination meetings. The purpose of these meetings was to brainstorm art ideas with the design team consultants and other project staff and to familiarize the Artists with the project opportunities and constraints. Fo1Jowing the first series of meetings, the Artist developed preliminary ideas for artworks and presented those ideas to the design team consultants, City staff and Art Coordinator for input and prioritization. Fo1Jowing this work session of preliminary ideas and designs, and based on the recommendations received, the Artists developed primary idea(s) into a conceptual artwork proposal. The Conceptual Artwork Proposals outline themes and concepts inspiring the artists. They can out material choices and a prioritized list of artwork opportunities and locations. Exterior Artwork Conceptual Ideas 1. The paved drop-off areas at the Center's entrance . Utilize a combination ofpebbJe mosaic, boulders and integral concrete pavers in a raindrop circular pattern. 2. Water feature . ScuJptural series of boulders with flowing water and rin. The water shan be touchable, a gent1e, flowing water near integrated seating. 3. Landscape planting areas . Green the entry experience by bringing plantings found in the forest to the entrance. Crcate a pleasant pedestrian and park-like transition from the asphalt parking lot into the entrance. Interior Artwork Proposal/Artist Made Buildim! Parts Pro2,ram Interpret the theme "Tying living things together" through rhythms of color, pattern, and multi-media art materials. A. Interior Artwork Proposal Project Budget: $90,000 1. Front entrance glass wall. Can be seen from outside as colorful beacon, identifying the entrance, view from most lobby areas within, from pool area and the Forest Room. 2. Glass at the top of the Cultural Gallery, will cast color and create interest from long view down hallway. Tie the two community areas together and create another surprise point of beauty and interest. 3. Influence concrete floor choices of color, pattern, and inlays to compliment the exterior and interior artwork themes and materials. B. Artist Made Building Parts Program Project Budget: $30,000 1. The fireplace in the Forest Room. Artist will design the hearth, fireplace mantle and wall. Café Tables. 2. Artist designed café table gallery. Colorful art tables with drawers for displaying rotating collections. The table ga11ery might feature stories, games, travel photos, memories from homeland's and collections of all types. Arts Commission Recommendation The Arts Commission unanimously voted to approve the 2% for Community Center Artwork Proposal, Themes and Concepts and forward to City Council for authorization to proceed. A presentation of additional information, themes and concepts will occur at the Council Committee meeting. Committee Recommendation: Motion to recommend a "do pass" to approve the 2% for Art Community Center conceptual artwork proposal, and authorize artists to move forward into final design and place before City Council on July 20, 2004 for approval. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ---(J~<Ajj "-..-// MEETING ÐA TE: JuJy 20, 2004 ITEM# XC~) CITY OF FEDERAL 'VAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Dumas Bay Centre Landscaping Scrviccs CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BlJSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 l>lJHLlC lŒARING 0 OTH)(R Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Am..: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee Action Form dated July 12,2004; Dumas Bay Centre Landscaping Services SlJMMARY/BACKGROUND: On May 12,2004 the Dumas Bay Centre issued a Request For Quotes for Landscaping Services. Bid packets were sent to twenty companies from the smal1 works roster. We had four responses to this Rcqucst for Quotcs. Staffrecommcnds accepting the low bid and awarding Trugrecn Landcare, LLC thc contract. Thc tota] amount of compensation for this contract is $39,93] .06 for a twenty-seven month contract tcrm. CITY COlJNCIL COMMITTE~~ RECOMM~~N»ATJON: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to authorize staff to acccpt thc bid from Trugrccn Landcarc LLC for landscaping services at thc Dumas Bay Centre and placc before City Council on July 20, 2004 for approval. PROJ>OSED MOTION: "] move approval of the Dumas Bay Centre Landscaping Services as presented". ~1~~:~~~ ::~^~.~- . ..~-- --- ------_u---- - ---- ----- --------- ----- ---- ----------- -------..---- -------- --- -----~-- (BELOW TO BE COMPLE11iiJ BY CiTY CLh'RKS OF'lqCE) COlJNCIL ACTION: 0 AI>PROVED 0 DENIED 0 TAHLED!DKF~~RRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND JU~ADlNG (ordinances only) COUNCIL HILL # 1 ST reading ------ Enactment reading -- ORDINANCE # RESOLlJTlON # --~- ------ -- -------- ---------------- ------------- ---------~- REVISED - 05/10/2001 S.L CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: July 12, 2004 PRHSPS Council Committee Mary Faber, Recreation and Cultural Services Superintendent Rob Ettinger, Dumas Bay Centre Coordinator David Mos~ Manager Dumas Bay èifntre-Landscaping Services Via: Subject: Back2round: On May 12,2004 the Dumas Bay Centre issued a Request For Quotes for Landscaping Services. Bid packets were sent to twenty companies from the sma]] works roster. We had four responses to this Request for Quotes. Staff recommends accepÜng the low bid and awarding Trugreen Landcare, LLC the contract. The total amount of compensaÜon for this contract is $39,931.06 for a twenty-seven month contract term. Bid Summary Request for Quote's was received from the fo]]owing companies and the results are as fo]]ows: Yearly Additional Maintenance Services Cost per Hour Cost Blue Sky $25,569.00 $38.00 Landscaping Meyers Master $19,400 $37.50 Lawncare Trugreen $15,440 $38 Landcare No Response No The Greenery Response Committee Recommendation: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to authorize staff to accept the bid from Trugreen Landcare LLC for landscaping services at the Dumas Bay Centre and place before City Council on July 20, 2004 for approval. c-\ MAINTENANCE/LABOR AGREEMENT FOR TRU-GREEN LAND CARE, LLC This Maintenance/Labor Agreement ("Agreement") is dated effective this 1 st day of August, 2004. The parÜes ("Parties") to this Agreement are the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City"), and Tru-Green Landcare, LLC, a Washington corporation ("Contractor"). A. The City seeks the professional services of a ski11ed independent contractor capable of working without direct supervision, in the capacity of park landscape maintenance at Dumas Bay Center, located at 3200 S.W. Dash Point Road, Federal Way, Washington; and B. The Contractor has the requisite ski11 and experience necessary to provide such services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Services. 1.1 Scope of Work. Contractor shall provide the services more specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference ("Services"), in a manner consistent with the accepted practices for other similar services, performed to the City's satisfaction, within the time period prescribed by the City and pursuant to the direction ofthe City Manager or his or her designee. 1.2 AddiÜonal Services. The City may elect to have the Contractor perform addiÜonal work or services, in connection with this project. The Contractor sha11 not proceed with the Additional Services until so authorized in writing by the City. Payment for all Additional Services performed under this Agreement shall be as outlined below in Paragraph 4.1 (ii). If the Additional Services should be requested by the City, such request shall be evidenced by a written amendment signed by the City authorizing the Additional Services, and signed by the Contractor accepting the Additional Services, according to the terms of the amendment. 2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the effective date of this Agreement and shall continue until the completion ofthe Services, but in any event no later than November 30,2006 ("Term"). This Agreement may be extended for additional periods oftime upon the mutual written agreement of the City and the Contractor. - 1 - 3. Termination. Prior to the expiration of the Term, this Agreement may be terminated immediately with or without cause by the City. 4. Compensation. 4.1 Total Compensation. In consideration of the Contractor performing the Scrvices, thc City agrees to pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed the sum of the following items more specifically described in Exhibit "B"attached herto and incorporated by this refercnce ("Compensati on"): (i) Contractor's Fee. An amount equal to the sum of Thirty Six Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty One Do11ars and six cents (36,931.06). This amount includes a11 applicable 8.6% sales tax. (ii) Additional Services Compensation. In consideration of the Contractor performing the Additional Services described in Exhibit A and B attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, the City agrees to pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed Three Thousand and nolI 00 Do11ars ($3,000.00) calculated on the basis of an hourly labor charge of$38.00 per hour plus all applicable sales tax of8.6%. 4.2 Method of Payment. Payment by the City for the Services will only be made after the Services have been performed, a voucher or invoice is submitted in the fornl specified by the City, which invoice sha11 specifica11y describe the Services performcd, thc name of Contractor's personnel performing such Services, the hourly labor charge rate for such personnel, and the same is approved by the appropriate City representative. Payment shall be made on a monthly basis, thirty (30) days after receipt of such voucher or invoicc. 4.3 Contractor Responsible for Taxes. Except as otherwise provided in Section 4.1 hereof, the Contractor sha11 be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes imposed by any lawful jurisdiction as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement. 5. Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall comply with and perform the Services in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and City laws including, without limitation, all City codes, ordinances, resolutions, standards and policies, as now existing or hereafter adopted or amended. 6. Warranty. 6.1 Requisite Skill. The Contractor warrants that it has the requisite training, skil1 and experience necessary to provide the Services and is appropriately accredited and liccnsed by all applicable agencies and governmental entities, including but not limited to being - 2 - registered to do business in the City of Federal Way by obtaining a City of Federal Way business registration. 6.2 Defective Services. The Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, correct all Services performed which the City deems to have defects in workmanship and material discovered within one (1) year after the City's final acceptance of the Services. 7. Independent Contractor/Conflict ofInterest. It is the intention and understanding of the Parties that the Contractor shall be an independent contractor and that the City shal1 be neither liable nor obligated to pay Contractor sick leave, vacation payor any other benefit of employment, nor to pay any social security or other tax which may arise as an incident of employment. The Contractor shall pay all income and other taxes as due. Industrial or any other insurance, which is purchased for the benefit of the City, regardless of whether such may provide a secondary or incidental benefit to the Contractor, shal1 not be deemed to convert this Agreement to an employment contract. It is recognized that Contractor mayor will be performing professional services during the Term for other parties; provided, however, that such performance of other services shall not conflict with or interfere with Contractor's ability to perform the Services. Contractor agrees to resolve any such conflicts of interest in favor of the City. 8. Indemni fi cati on. 8.1 Contractor Indemnification. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from, or connected with this Agreement to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions ofthe Contractor, its partners, shareholders, agents, employees, or by the Contractor's breach ofthis Agreement. Contractor waives any immunity that may be granted to it under the Washington State Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW. Contractor's indemni fication shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount of damages, compensation or benefits payable to or by any third party under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts or any other benefits acts or programs. 8.2 City Indemnification. The City agrees to indemnify and hold the Contractor, its officers, directors, shareholders, partners, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) to or by any and al1 persons or entities, including without limitation, their respective agents, licensecs, or representatives, arising from, resulting from or connected with this Agreement to the extent solely caused by the negligent acts, errors, or omissions ofthe City, its employees or agents. - 3 - 8.3 Survival. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination ofthis Agreement with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or terminati on. 9. Equal Opportunity Employer. In all Contractor services, programs or activities, and all Contractor hiring and employment made possible by or resulting from this Agreement, there shall be no discrimination by Contractor or by Contractor's employees, agents, subcontractors or representatives against any person because of sex, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), race, color, creed, national origin, marital status or the presence of any disability, including sensory, mental or physical handicaps, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification in relationship to hiring and employment. This requirement shall apply, but not be limited to the following: employment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of payor other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Contractor shall not violate any of the terms of Chapter 49.60 RCW, Title VlI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans With Disabilitics Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or any other applicable federal, state or local law or regulation regarding non-discrimination. Any material violation of this provision shall be grounds for termination of this Agreement by the City and, in the case of the Contractor's breach, may result in ineligibility for further City agreements. 10. Confidentiality. All information regarding the City obtained by Contractor in performance ofthis Agreement shall be considered confidential. Breach of confidentiality by Contractor will be grounds for immediate termination. 11. Insurance. The Contractor agrees to carry as a minimum, the following insurance, in such forms and with such carriers who have a rating, which is satisfactory to the City: 11.1 Workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance in amounts sufficient pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington; 11.2 Commercial general liability insurance with combined single limits of liability not less than $2,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death, products liability and property damage. 11.3 Automobile liability insurance with combined single limits of liability not less than $2,000,000 for bodily injury, including personal injury or death and property damage. The City shall be named as additional insured on all such insurance policies, with the exception of workers' compensation coverages. Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance, concurrent with the execution ofthis Agreement, evidencing such coverage and, at City's request, furnish the City with copies of all insurance policies and with evidence of payment ofpremiums or fees of such policies. All insurance policies shall contain a clause of endorsement providing that they may not be terminated or materially amended during the - 4 - Term of this Agreement, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. If Contractor's insurance policies are "c1aims made" or "c1aims paid", Contractor shalJ be required to maintain tail coverage for a minimum period of three (3) years from the date this Agreement is actualJy terminated. Contractor's failure to maintain such insurance policies shall be grounds for the City's immediate tennination of this Agreement. The provisions ofthis Section shalJ survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination. 12. Work Product. All originals and copies of work product, including plans, sketches, layouts, designs, design specifications, records, files, computer disks, magnetic media or material which may be produced or modified by Contractor while performing the Services shall belong to the City. At the tennination or cancelJation of this Agreement, alJ originals and copies of any such work product remaining in the possession of Contractor shall be delivered to the City. 13. Books and Records. The Contractor agrees to maintain books, records, and documents which sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs related to the performance of the Services and maintain such accounting procedures and practices as may be deemed necessary by the City to assure proper accounting of all funds paid pursuant to this Agreement. These records shall be subject, at all reasonable times, to inspection, review or audit by the City, its authorized representative, the State Auditor, or other governmental officials authorized by law to monitor this Agreement. 14. Safety. Contractor shalJ take alJ necessary precautions for the safety of employees on the work site and shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state and municipal safety and health laws and codes, including without limitation, all OSHA/WISHA requirements, Safety and Health Standards for Construction Work (Chapter 296-155 WAC), General Safety and Health Standards (Chapter 296-24 WAC), and General Occupational Health Standards (Chapter 296-62 WAC). Contractor shall erect and properly maintain, at all times, all necessary guards, barricades, signals and other safeguards at all unsafe places at or near the site for the protection of its employees and the public, safe passageways at all road crossings, crosswalks, street intersections, post danger signs warning against known or unusual hazards and do alJ other things necessary to prevent accident or loss of any kind. Contractor shall protect from damage all water, sewer, gas, steam or other pipes or conduits, and all hydrants and alJ other property that is likely to become displaced or damaged by the performance ofthe Services. The Contractor shalJ, at its own expense, secure and maintain a safe storage place for its materials and equipment and is solely responsible for the same. 15. Prevailing Wages 15.1 Wages of Employees. This Agreement is subject to the minimum wage requirements of Chapter 39.12 of the Revised Code of Washington, as now existing or hereafter amended or supplemented. In the payment of hourly wages and fringe benefits to - 5 - be paid to any of Contractor's laborers, workpersons and/or mechanics, Contractor shall not pay less than the "prevailing rate of wage" for an hour's work in the same trade or occupation in the locality within the State of Washington where such labor is perfoffi1ed, as determined by the Industrial Statistician of the Department of Labor and Industries of the State of Washington, which current "prevailing rates of wage" are attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. Prevailing wages paid pursuant to this Agreemcnt shall be the prevailing wage rates that are in effect on the date when the bids, proposals, or quotes were required to be submitted to the City. 15.2 Agreements Exceeding One Year. Pursuant to WAC 296-127-023, or hereafter amended, the City agrees to pay any increase in the current prevailing wages ifand when this Contract is extended provided that the term of the Contract exceeds one year. The city further agrees to pay the current prevailing wages at the time of additional yearly extensions, and the Contractor agrees to pay its employees the increased prevailing wage. 15.3 Exemptions to Prevailing Wage. The prevailing wage requirements of Chapter 39.12 RCW, and as required in this Agreement do not apply to: a. Sole owners and their spouses; b. Any partner who owns at least 30% of a partnership; c. The President, Vice President and Treasurer of a corporation if each one owns at least 30% of the corporation. 1 5.4 Reporting Requirements. Contractor shall comply with all reporting requirements of the Department of Labor and Industries of the State of Washington. Upon the execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall complete and file a Statement ofIntent to Pay Prevailing Wages with the Department of Labor and Industries. Upon completion ofthe Services, Contractor shall complete and file an Affidavit of Wages Paid with the Department of Labor and Industries. Contractor shall deliver copies of both the Statement ofIntent to Pay Prevailing Wages and the Affidavit of Wages Paid, certified by the Department of Labor and Industries, to the City. 15.5 Disputes. In the event any dispute arises as to what are the prevailing rates of wages for work of a similar nature and such dispute cannot be resolved by the City and the Contractor, the matter shall be referred for arbitration to the Director of the Department of Labor and Industries of the State of Washington and the decision therein shall be final and conclusive and binding on all parties involved in the dispute. - 6 - 16. Clean Up. At any time ordered by the City and immediately after completion of the Services, the Contractor, sha1l, at its own expense, clean up and remove a1l refuse and unused materials of any kind resulting from the Services. In the event the Contractor fails to perform the necessary clean up, the City may, but in no event is it obligated to, perform the necessary clean up and the costs thereof sha1l be immediately paid by the Contractor to the City and/or the City may deduct its costs from any remaining payments due to the Contractor. ] 7. Non-Appropriation of Funds. Ifsufficient funds are not appropriated or a1located for payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City wi1l not be obligated to make payments for Services or amounts incurred after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement wi1l terminate upon the completion of a11 remaining Services for which funds are a1located. No penalty or expense sha1l accrue to the City in the event this provision apphes. ] 8. General Provisions. 18.] Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains a1l of the agreements of the Parties with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement and no prior agreements sha11 be effective for any purpose. 18.2 Modification. No provision ofthis Agreement may be amended or modified except by written agreement signed by the Parties. ] 8.3 Fu1l Force and Effect. Any provision of this Agreement which is declared invalid or i1legal sha11 in no way affect or invalidate any other provision hereof and such other provisions sha11 remain in fu1l force and effect. 18.4 Assignment. Neither the Contractor nor the City sha11 have the right to transfer or assign, in whole or in part, any or a1l of its obligations and rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Party. 18.5 Successors in Interest. Subject to the foregoing Subsection, the rights and obligations of the Parties sha1l inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors in interest, heirs and assigns. 18.6 Attorney Fees. In the event either of the Parties defaults on the performance of any terms of this Agreement or either Party places the enforcement of this Agreement in the hands of an attorney, or files a lawsuit, each Party sha11 pay all its own attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. The venue for any dispute related to this Agreement sha1l be King County, Washington. ]8.7 No Waiver. Fai]ure or delay of the City to declare any breach or default immediately upon occurrence sha1l not waive such breach or default. Failure ofthe City to - 7 - declare one breach or default does not act as a waiver of the City's right to declare another breach or default. 18.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. 18.9 Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City and Contractor represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor or the City. 18. 1 0 Notices. Any notices required to be given by the Parties shall be delivered at the addresses set forth below. Any notices may be delivered personally to the addressee of the notice or may be deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address set forth below. Any notice so posted in the United States mail shall be deemed received three (3) days after the date ofmailing. 18.11 Captions. The respec6ve captions of the Sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to modify or otherwise affect any of the provisions of this Agreement. 18.12 Performance. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the description of the Services is essential to the Contractor's performance of this Agreement. 18.13 Remedies Cumulative. Any remedies provided for under the terms of this Agreement are not intended to be exclusive, but shall be cumulative with all other remedies available to the City at law, in equity or by statute. 18.14 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, which counterparts shall collec6vely constitute the entire Agreement. 18.15 Compliance with Ethics Code. If a violation of the City's Ethics Resolution No. 91-54, as amended, occurs as a result of the formation and/or performance of this Agreement, this Agreement may be rendered null and void, at the City's option. - 8 - DATED the day and year set forth above. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: David H. Moseley, City Manager 33530 1 st Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 ATTEST: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patricia A. Richardson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR By: (Signature) Tom DiMeco, 16075 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD TIGARD, OR 97224-7733 Its: Region Manger ST A TE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day personal1y appeared before me , to me known to be the of that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she - 9 - was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation, GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of ,200_, (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires By: - 10 - Mowing, Trimming, Edging* Fertilize Ditches ~Ní.Q§QliiAê.$$g$ Weeding Edge ground cover . ~~r~i~i~!a.. ~ .~~e~~~er!J~nt... ..f. waR¡9::¡ANØ::~8m\)~$:::: Tree Pruning Shrubs* ~~d9.~~n~(p'~,!11.a~E?~Y. ç~ntr~) :H&I.(?:!ÃQ!!îm$.~9$)::<? Sweeping/Blowing Weed/herbicide 2004 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE STANDARDS - DUMAS BAY CENTRE EXHIBIT "A" -'-'--"-- "'-"--_n_- - - n_- n__.. ._..fr~g~_ef2cy .~t..ry-1onth._- May Jun Jul Aug . -- ..-.- n. n. --.. m .n. .... -- -.-- I Dec I 2 4 5 5 4 5 3 2 1 . -- -- ..-.-. --- - .-.. - n ..-- moo -- -.--- ..-- . .-..- .-- """ - ---- - .n_- ..- ..--. n..- .n_.. -.- .n- 1 1 1 1 - ---._- .---- .---..-_(__._n_.._- ":¡--"-"---'--1'--- ---.nT-'---- '--1 '-'-".-- '1-"-- '--1-- ---. n.:;. -""'-'-1- .--- ----..¡ .- .-- -- . m-- n.- . j - . ..-- --. -J 1 1 I n_._._.-......----..---.-..- n_. ---.__n - --'-"---..__n"""""..n..___.....--..-..- --. .-- __.n_~____- m"'_"--'._n_.__- -. _!_-.---- __n nn- ..n- --._..._..1_- --.. --..-. .-. -.--- n__- ~- .n..._' 1 1 1 1 _.j . --.: rJ - . ..- -- I \ '--1i V 1ï -- I 1 1 1 .- -. . ..-. 2 .-. -. - - n_.- . 15 -- .-- - -- -.--. .--.-. .n._. .____.1 n... .-.-.. -...--. *Shrubs/hedges - trim as needed to maintain a neat appearance I I I I I I I *Mowing - Additional required mowings will require Contract Administrators approval and invoiced as additional services and must be approved in writing. *Contract is responsible for submitting a schedule weekly of tasks performed - Schedule should be turned into the Contract Administrator the day of service Feb Mar Apr _n- -.. -- n_"'.- Sep Oct Nov n- -- ..... .--- --. . -- - .m__- --.--- 3_- 4 4 . - n- . __n.. .- - m- 1 4 4 3 2 n_._.__-.- --m__-..._---- - ..n_.. ... n__. . -- -.- .--- ---. - - - . -- ___n .. ..-- .-- __n .-- - --- ----. --- .. - ---- - ...--.. --.-...-- n. ------- --- 2 3 5 4 .- ..--. .n- ..n --. ...- "'--__n_- ..-.-.. -- --- n__. 1 -.n_._....-- "--_.n____..... 4 3 2 1 1 ~ 2 2 3 - .- ..---. -- - -- .m_- --- .--.- ---. . -. -- --- . u -- 1 2 4 4 5 3 ---u- ----1¡"-----"'2L' 4! 41 51 3 - 1 11 71 121 201 271 271 22 2 2 1 -"'-"'-----"-"" --.. -----...-. 4 3 2 - .. ..-- -- . ---- . -.. . __.n "'.- - -- n- 3 3 2 -- ..._n -- -'. ---"..n- - n_... ..-- 2 2 - --. ---..-. - .- --..- _._n - .--. .... 27 21 14 - .-- .-.. '.n_- .---- .-. --. -...- "--n__- .-- n__- n___. ---. --- --- A TT ACHMENT "B" 2004 DUMAS BAY CENTRE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE COSTS BID SHEET MONTH SERVICES PER COST PER TOT AL COST OF MONTH SERVICE MAINTENANCE PER MONTH January 1 X 69.45 = 69.45 February 7 X $23.15 = 162.05 March 12 X 94.08 = 1,128.96 April 20 X 80.73 1,614.60 May 27 X 88.96 = 2,401.92 June 27 X 78.40 = 2,116.80 July 22 X 79.83 1,756.26 = August 27 X 88.63 = 2,393.01 September 21 X 73.22 1,537.62 = October 14 X 76.63 1,072.83 = November 15 X 74.47 = 1,117.05 December 1 X 69.45 = 69.45 Maximum Annual 194 X 79.59 15,440.00 Cost * Additional $_38 Per hour services per hour * Additional services shal1 be performed only with written notification from contract administrator *Project costs shall be based on the number of services (e.g. mowing, trimming, weeding etc.) provided for each month, the same unit cost is applied equally to all items of work. * All items of work task must be completed with any given month in order to receive full payment for that month. No items will be carried forward to the following month. If item is not completed by the end of the month, payment for that item will be forfeited. * AD prices include Washington State sales tax - 11 - MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS - Attachment D TURF Turf areas to be maintained include medians, parks and mow strips along paths. ATl turf shaTl be mowed to a height of 1-'li inches. CoTlection of grass clippings is required. ATl turf around posts, fences, trees, closure boxes, vaults, valve boxes and other obstructions shall be maintained using mechanical and/or pre-emergent and post-emergent methods. All turf area shall be edged at sidewalks, curbs and landscape beds on a schedule specified in the Annual Maintenance Standards. Extreme caution should be used to prevent chipping of concrete structures by edging equipment, and use proper guards for public safety. All formal turf areas shall be fertilized with an approved fertilizer on a schedule specified in the Annual Maintenance Standards. Total application of turf fertilizer shaTl be applied at the rate of four pounds of nitrogen per 1,000 square feet or turf per year: March, June and August* shall be slow release 3- I -2 ratio fertilizer with iron. Trees, Shrubs and Ground Cover Beds Beds areas shan be kept in a weed free condition. An beds shan be weeded by mechanical and/or chemical means. The City reserves the right to limit the use of specific herbicides and/or applica60ns of said herbicides. Casaron shan be used only with the approval of the Contract Administrator and only in very limited areas. Applications wi1l be applied according to label instructions. Ground cover shaTl be edged 4 to 6 inches behind all sidewalks, curbs, fences and edges of landscape beds. Shrubs shaTl be trimmed or sheared to maintain desired shape and function as needed to provide a neat, trimmed or sheared to maintain desired shape and function as needed to provide a neat, trim appearance. Special attention shall be made to aTl park entries. Trees shaTl be pruned to remove singular broken branehes or perform minor clearance pruning. Minimum clearance height for tree branches is fourteen (14) feet above the paved surface of the street or parking lots and eight (8) feet over the surface of a public sidewalk or pedestrian path. Tree suckers and volunteer seedlings shan be removed as necessary. Singular branches, which are hanging below the overan tree canopy and are in impediment to pedestrian traffic or maintenance activities, may be pruned back to the first lateral. 4. 5. 6. Trees which require minor clearance pruning shan be pruned to the closest lateral or, if such pruning wi1l result in the stubbing the branch, prune branch flush with tree trunk. Maintenance Specifications 1. The Contractor wiT] furnish aTl labor, tools, specialized equipment, materials, disposal of waste material generated by the work, supervision and transportation to perform landscape maintenance services as specificaTly outline in the Annual Maintenance Standards. ATl fieldwork shaTl be performed under the supervision of a qualified horticulturist. Operators will be licensed for aTl functions, induding pesticide, fertilizer, and herbicide application, and flagging card when required. The Contractor wiTl ensure that employees comply with aTl applicable City of Federal Way and Washington State regulations and practices with respect to work performed for the City of Federal Way. The Contractor's personnel wiTl conduct themselves on site in a professional manner at all times. Each employee wiTl wear or display the company's name and/or logo. The Contract Administrator or appointed designee wiTl inspect work performed by the Contractor on a regular basis. In the event of work performance deficiencies, the Contract Administrator wiTl notify the 2. 3. - 12 - 7. Contractor. Notification may be verbal or written. The City may choose to: Require the Contractor to rectify the deficiency within 48 hours, or hold payment. Equipment intensive work such as mowing, edging and blowing done at this site shall not commence before 7:00 a.rn. and end on 8:00 p.rn. on weekdays, (weekend work not allowed without prior approval) and it is advisable that mowing be performed during non-peak park use. All equipment intensive work preformed at Dumas Bay Centre must be coordinated with Conference Coordinator so that it wiJI not disturb events inside the buildini!. Report any damage, or potential hazard, involving City property immediately to the City of Federal Way Parks Department, (253) 661-4055. After hours emergencies should be reported to the Police/Fire Communications Center - 911. Hazardous conditions shall be immediately remedied or secured to prevent further damage and/or protect public from injury. It is the Contractor's responsibility to provide close supervision of maintenance operations and management of the site. Incidents, altercations, or accident involving the public shall be reported to the Contract Administrator within 24 hours. The Contract Administrator, at his or her discretion, may require a written report from the Contractor describing the incident or accident. The Contractor, at his or her expense, will remedy any damage to City stTUctures, irrigation heads or plant material due to Contractor negligence in a timely manner. Ornamental trees, which have been allowed to grow branches to or near the ground, are to be vegetation free 12 to 18 inches around the perimeter of the lowest branches. The Contractor shall be responsible for notifying the Contract Administrator of any significant tree hazards including, but not limÜed to: dead native and ornamental trees, broken limbs, disease and insect infestations. 8. 9. Hard Surfaces Sidewalks, curbs, and other hard surfaces shall be kept free ofTeaves, litter and debris. The use of power blowers is acceptable, however, accumulations of debris must be removed from the site and legally disposed of and not blown onto adjacent property or onto adjacent street surfaces. All vegetation in sidewalks, curbs and other hard surfaces shall receive an approved vegetation eliminator application and be removed at the next site visit. In no case shall any pre or post-emergent herbicides with residual characteristics (i.e. Casaron) be used in these areas. Other Services All litter, debris and animal feces shall be removed from turf, beds and hard surface areas. Litter shall be removed from the site for disposal by the Contractor. Garbage cans will be emptied to an approved dumping station or City provided dumpster at each visit. Each can will have a new liner installed. Windfall branches shall be removed from all areas for disposal by the Contractor. Wind fallen trees are not included in the contract. Leaves, needles, cones and other vegetative material shall be removed from all formal areas. Additional Site Specification DUMAS BAY CENTRE 10. Previously maintained trees and brush along the west bluff shall be trimmed to maintain an open view corridor. This will be accomplished by maintaining the vegetative growth at 3' to 4' above the top edge of the bluff. Special attention given to entries and courtyards for appearance to include but not limited to: weeding, blowing, pruning, hedges trimmed and litter control. Pines trimmed bonsai style are not included in base scope of services Wipe down picnic tables and interpretive signage at each site visit. 11. 12. 13. - 13 - 14. Due to overnight retreats and day meetings, aTl noise related activities must be scheduled with Contract Administrator prior maintenance activity. - 14 - MEETING DATE: July 20, 2004 ITEM#'-::QL \ )__n CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Projects Thompson Park and Armstrong Park: 100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid and A ward CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: 0 ~ 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ A 1'1' ACHMENTS: Committee Action Forms dated July 6, 2004; Thompson Park: 100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid and A ward Project; Armstrong Park: 100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid and A ward Project. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The 2,8acre Thompson property will be developed as a neighborhood park, with a paved walking path, small basketba11 court, and children's play areas, Landscaping, irrigation, and drainage will be provided, Grading wi11 be performed along the south edge to improve views in from the street. The Armstrong project includes development of a neighborhood park that will include an extension of the BP A trail, a playground, and open play fields. Four parking spaces will be provided on 15th Avenue SW. A pedestrian safety refuge island will be provided on S 356th Street for those crossing over from Phase III of the BP A Trail. Other than these improvements, the site will remain in its existing condition, which includes extensive wetland and wetland buffer. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve the 100% design plans for Thompson Park, and Armstrong Park and place these items on the July 20, 2004 Full Council Agenda. Authorize staff to advertise the projects for bid, and to award the projects to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. This authorization is based on receiving favorable land use and SEP A approva1s, and is contingent upon bid award up to the approved budget amounts. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Thompson Park and Armstrong Park: 100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid and Award Project as presented". CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OF~FICB) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 City of Federal Way PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: To: July 6, 2004 PRHSPS Council Committee Via: David Mose1cy, City Manager B Sanders, Park Planning & Development Coordinator From: Subject: Thompson Park: 100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid and Award I>roject Background: The 2.8acre property will be developed as a neighborhood park, with a paved walking path, small basketball court, and children's play areas. Landscaping, irrigation, and drainage will be provided. Grading will be performed along the south edge to improve views in from the street. The approved budget for design and constTuction ofthis project is $350,000. The Council reviewed preliminary plans for the project on February 17, 2004, and approved 85% design in May 2004. Preliminary costs are estimated at $387,201. In order to stay within the total project budget, the bid package will be structured with bid alternates. Cost Estimate: Construction-Year 2004 (Estimate) 12% Construction Contingency 8.8% Sales Tax Total Construction Costs $266,298 $ 31,956 $ 25,948 $324,201 $ 63,000 $387,201 Design Total Project Costs Potential Bid Alternates to reduce cost: 1. Site Furnishings $17,190 2. Portion of Trail $31,500 Total Bid Alternates $48,690 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends placing the following item on the July 20,2004 Council Consent Agenda: 1. Approve the 100% design plans for Thompson Park. 2. Authorize staff to advertise the project and to award the project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. This authorization to bid is based on receiving favorable land use and SEP A approvals, and is contingent upon bid award up to the approved budget amounts. /~. 75/ 5.Ç S.D City of Federal Way PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: To: July 6, 2004 PRHSPS Council Committee Via: David Moseley, City Manager B Sanders, Park Planning & Development Coordinator From: Subject: Armstrong Park: ] 00% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid and Award Project Background: The Armstrong project includes development of a neighborhood park that will include an extension of the BPA trail, a playground, and open play fields. Four parking spaces will be provided on 15th Avenue SW. A pedestrian safety refuge island will be provided on S 356tl1 Street for those crossing over from Phase III of the BPA Trail. Other than these improvements, the site will remain in its existing condition, which incTudes extensive wetland and wetland buffer. The approved budget for design and construction of this project is $375,000. Design costs are approximately $88,000. The Council reviewed preliminary plans for the project on February 17, 2004, and approved 85% design in May 2006. Preliminary design and construction costs are estimated at $382,906. In order to stay within the total project budget, the bid package will be structured with bid alternates. Cost Estimate: Construction-Year 2004 (Estimate) 12% Construction Contingency 8.8% Sales Tax Total Construction Costs $242,235 $ 29,068 $ 23,603 $294,906 $ 88,000 $382,906 Design Total Project Costs: Poten6al Bid Alternates to Reduce Costs: Site Furnishings $8,000 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends placing the following items on the July 20, 2004 Council Consent Agenda: 1. Approve the 100% design plans for Thompson Park 2. Authorize staff to advertise the project for bid, and to award the project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. This authorization is based on receiving favorable land use and SEP A approvals, and is contingent upon bid award up to the approved budget amounts. APPROVAL OF COMMITTE L./ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, WAIVING SECTION 7(B) OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PURCHASING POLICIES FOR PURPOSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF THOMPSON AND ARMSTRONG PARK SITES. -~~- -~. -.-..-- ---._- WHEREAS, the City Council approved 85% design as presented for the Thompson and Armstrong Neighborhood Parks on May 3,2004; and WHEREAS, the Thompson property received partial CDBG funding for playground equipment, which must be spent no later than December 31, 2004; and WHEREAS, the desire of the neighborhoods is to complete these projects in 2004; and WHEREAS, the land use applications are pending in the Department of Community Development; and WHEREAS, environmental review of the projects is pending; and WHEREAS, construction in the wetlands buffer area must be completed no later than October 1,2004 and cannot commence until Summer of2005; and WHEREAS, the City anticipates these two contracts will be over $20,000; and Res. # , Pagel f-2- WHEREAS, Section 7(b) of the City's purchasing policies require that contracts over $20,000 be approved by the CÜy Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council approval process can take up to a month due to Council and Committee meeting schedules; and WHEREAS, Council approval could cause delay in the completion of work in the wetlands buffer area before the October 1 sl deadline; and WHEREAS, a11 other Purchasing Policies and applicable state laws, such as competitive bidding requirements, will remain in effect; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the public interest to waive Section 7(b) of the City of Federal Way Purchasing Policies for purposes of the Thompson and Armstrong Park Sites; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 7(b) of the City of Federal Way Purchasing Policies is waived for purposes of the Thompson and Armstrong Park Sites. Section 2. Severability. The City Council of the City of Federal Way hereby authorizes advertisement for bid and bid award up to the approved budget amounts, subject to land use and environmental approval. Res. # , Page 2 E-3 - Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 4. Effective Date. This resolution sha11 bc effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON this day of ,2004. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MA YOR, DEAN McCOLGAN ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON Res. # , Page 3 E~I FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: K:/Resolution/7(b) Reso Res. # , Page 4 ~-s MEETING DATE: July 20, 2004 ITEM# MCa) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ETHICS BOARD APPOINTMENT CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: 0 0 C8J CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: none SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: At a special meeting on July 20, 2004, the City Council will interview applicants to fill one 3-year boardmember position and one 3-year alternate position on the city's Ethics Board. David Head, outgoing boardmember, did not reapply. The existing alternate, Michael Moneck, whose term also expires has applied for the vacant boardmember position. In accordance with the resolution, only one alternate is allowed on the board. The Council will confirm their new appointments during that evening's regular meeting. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: none PROPOSED MOTION: I hereby move the appointment of the following persons to the city's Ethics Board: One 3-year boardmember term expiring June 30, 2007 - One 3-year alternate term ending June 30, 2007 - (The City Clerk will arrange for introductions and certificate presentations at the August 3 regular meeting) CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 MEETING DATE: July 20, 2004 ITEM# ]lLLb) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: DIVERSITY COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS CATEGORY: BUDGET IMP ACT: 0 0 ~ CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: none SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: At a special meeting on July 20, 2004, the City Council will interview applicants to till three 3-year terms and one 1 -year unexpired term on the city's Diversity Commission. Neither ofthe two commissioners whose terms are expiring have reapplied. One 3-year position is already vacant due to an earlier resignation, and one position with an expiration date of May 31,2005 is also vacant. There are no alternates on the commission at this time. The Council will confirm their new appointments during that evening's regular meeting. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: none PROPOSED MOTION: I hereby move the appointment ofthe following persons to the city's Diversity Commission: Three 3-year terms expiring May 31, 2007 - One I-year unexpired term ending May 31, 2005 - Alternates/terms expiring April 30, 2007 - (The City Clerk will arrange for introductions and certificate presentations at the August 3 regular meeting) CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST d" rea 109 Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 MEETING DATE: July 20, 2004 ITEM# =:2J[ .......................................... ............................................... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Code Amendments Updating Chapter 6, Criminal Code CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: . 0 CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS IZJ ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ...........................-....... ................................... """"""'....-..................-....... """.-.............-............. ..........-........................... ...........-.......................... """"""""""""""""""'" ATTACHMENTS: Memo from Pat Richardson, City Attorney to the Parks Recreation Human Services and Public Safety Committee regarding the proposed Code amendment to Chapter 6, Criminal Code. ........".............. """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""","-""""""""""""""""""""""""'.-.............-............-...-................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................."""""" SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Law Department is requesting adoption of the proposed ordinance to amend the City of Federal Way Criminal Code under Chapter 6 as it reflects changes the Washington State Legislature has made in state law regarding various crimes and the consequences thereof. The modifications are necessary to ensure consistent enforcement of the laws. The adoption of these amendments is in the best interest ofthe City of Federal Way, the Public Safety Department, Law Department, Municipal Court, and the Federal Way Citizens. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the July 12,2004 meeting the Parks Recreation Human Services and Public Safety Committee recommended that the proposed amendment to the Federal Way City Code Chapter 6, Criminal Code forwarded to the City Council for consideration at the July 20, 2004 City Council meeting. """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'-"..... .......--................................-......................-................. ........................................... ......................................-................. ............................-........................................................-.....................-......-....... .................................. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move the proposed ordinance to second reading and approval at the next regular meeting on July 20, 2004." CITY MANAGER ~ AL: .~.._..- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) .........................-......-....... ..............................-..................-....... ......."'.."'....'............-....... COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 K:\agnditem\2004...criminal code update S.(, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL PARKS/RECREATIONIHUMAN SERVICESI PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE July 12,2004 Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 Subject: Patricia A. Richardson, City Attorney ~ David H. ~.rè~tY Manager Code AmendmentUpdating Chapter 6, Criminal Code From: Via: Back2round: The Law Department proposes adoption of an ordinance to amend the City of Federal Way Code under Criminal Code Chapter 6 as a housekeeping matter. The Washington State Legislature has modified state laws regarding various crimes and the consequences thereof. The proposed amendment to Chapter 6 reflects the changes in state law. The modifications are necessary to ensure consistent enforcement of the criminal laws. The underlining indicates new misdemeanor designation and the strike through indicates new felony designation. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Parks Recreation Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee approve the proposed amendment to Chapter 6 ofthe Federal City Code and forward to full Council for consideration. Committee Recommendation: Move approval of the amendment to the Federal Way City Code, Chapter 6, Criminal Code, and forward to full Council for consideration at the July 20, 2004 City Council meeting. APPROVAL OF COMMITT ~--/ K\AGNDlTEM\PRHSPSCOMMITTEE\Criminal update 2004 L~-\ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY (Amending Ordinance Nos. 91-89, 91-106, 95-254, 99-362, 00-374, 01-401, 02-429, 04-458) WHEREAS, the State Legislature has recodified state law regarding various crimes and the consequences thereof, WHEREAS, the City Code is at variance with state law with respect to the existence, substance, description, or procedure of certain crimes and consequences, WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council finds that it is in the best interest of its citizens to update the City Criminal Code of the City Code to be more in accordance with state law in order to ensure more consistent and effective enforcement and prosecution of criminal activity within the City, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 6, Article III, Section 6-61 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6-61 Statutes adopted. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.02.050, Concealing birth. (2) RCW 9A.42.010, Definitions. (3) RCW 9A.42.035, Criminal mistreatment in the third degree. (4) RCW 9A.42.037, Criminal mistreatment in the fourth degree. (5) RCW 9A.42.080, Abandonment of a dependent person in the third degree. (6) RCW 9A.42.090, Abandonment of a dependent person - Defense. ORD# , PAGE 1 (7) RCW 9A.42.11 0, Leaving a child in the care of a sex offender. (8) RCW 13.32A.080, Unlawful harboring of a minor - Penalty - Defense - Prosecution of adult for involving child in commission of offense. (9) RCW 70.155.080. Purchasinq, possessinq by persons under eiqhteen - Civil infraction -- Jurisdiction. (10) RCW 70.155.105. Delivery sale of ciqarettes -- Requirements. unlawful practices --Penalties -- Enforcement. SECTION 2. Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 6-86 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6-86 Statutes adopted. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 69.41.020, Prohibited acts -Information not privileged communication. (2) RCW 69.41.030, Sale, delivery, or possession of legend drug without prescription or order prohibited - Exceptions. (3) RCW 69.41.040, Prescription requirements - Penalty ill ~ RCW 69.41.050, Labeling requirements Penalty. (5) RCW 69.41.320, Practitioners -- Restricted use -- Medical recor~ í§)j4j RCW 69.41.350, Penalties. ill tá1 RCW 69.43.010, Report to state board of pharmacy - List of substances - Modification of list - Identification of purchasers - Report of transactions - Penalties. fill tê1 RCW 69.43.020, Receipt of substance from source outside state - Report - Penalty. íill f71 RCW 69.43.030, Exemptions. í.1Ql.tß1 RCW 69.43.035, Suspicious transactions - Report - Penalty. (11) RCW 69.43.043, Recordkeepinq requirements--Penalty. ORD# , PAGE 2 ill.) f9j RCW 69.43.090, Permit to sell, transfer, furnish, or receive substance Exemptions - Application for permit - Fee - Renewal - Penalty. f.1]} ~ RCW 69.43.110, Ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, phenylpropanolamine Sales restrictions - Penalty. lliH-'t-1-j RCW 69.43.120, Ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, phenylpropanolamine- Possession of more than fifteen grams - Penalty - Exceptions. illL~ RCW 69.50.101, Definitions. fill ~ RCW 69.50.204(d)(13), Schedule I - Marijuana. í111J4-4t-RCW 69.50.309, Containers. í1ID.J4--ðj RCW 69.50.4014, Possession of forty grams or less of marihuana -- Penalty. llili f-1-êj RCW 69.50.412, Prohibited acts: E - Penalties. í2.Q1J~"B RCW 69.50.505, Seizure and forfeiture. í2.11J+3j RCW 69.50.506, Burden of proof. í2.21J:J.-9j RCW 69.50.509, Search and seizure of controlled substances. (20) RCV..., 69.50.125, Misdemo3nor viobtions Minimum imprisonment. SECTION 3. Chapter 6, Article VII, Section 6-161 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6-161 Frauds and swindles. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.04.010, False advertising. (2) RCW 9.12.010, Barratry. (3) RCW 9.12.020, Buying, demanding, or promising reward by district judge or deputy. (4) RCW 9.45.060, Encumbered, leased or rented personal property. (5) RCW 9.45.070, Mock auctions. (6) RCW 9.45.080, Fraudulent removal of property. (7) RCW 9.45.090, Knowingly receiving fraudulent conveyance. , PAGE 3 ORD# (8) RCW 9.45.100, Fraud in assignment for benefit of creditors. (9) RCW 9.26A.120, Fraud in operating coin-box telephone or other receptacle. (1O) RCW 9.26A.130, Penalty for manufacture or sale of slugs to be used for coin. (11) RCW 9A.56.330, Possession of another's identification. 0ll.f1-B RCW 9.60.010, Definitions. í.1ll ~ RCW 9A.60.040, Criminal impersonation in the first degree. .LH1J:t-ð~RCW 9A.60.045, Criminal impersonation in the second degree. {1§} fMj RCW 9A.60.050, False certification. (16) RCW 19.48.110, Obtaininq hotel, restaurant, lodqinq house, ski area, etc., accommodations by fraud -- Penalty. (17) RCW 74.08.331, Unlawful practices -- Obtaininq assistance -- Disposal of realty -- Penalties. SECTION 4. Chapter 6, Article IX, Section 6-211 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6-211 Theft, unauthorized issuance of bank checks and possession of stolen property. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.26A.11 0, Fraud in obtaining telecommunications service - Penalty. (2) RCW 9A.56.01 0, Definitions. (3) RCW 9A.56.020, Theft - Definition, defense. (4) RCW 9A.56.050, Theft in the third degree. (5) RCW 9A.56.060(1), (2), (3) and (5), Unlawful issuance of checks or drafts. (6) RCW 9A.56.096, Theft of rental, leased, or lease-purchased property. (7) RCW 9A.56.140, Possessing stolen property - Definition, credit cards, presumption. (8) RCW 9A.56.170, Possessing stolen property in the third degree. (9) RCW 9A.54.130, Restoration of stolen property - Duty of officers. ORD# ,PAGE 4 (10) RCW 9A.56.220, Theft of cable television services. (11) RCW 9A.56.240, Forfeiture and disposal of device used to commit violation. (12) RCW 9A.56.260, Connection of channel converter. (13) RCW 9A.56.270, Shopping cart theft. (14) RCW 9A.56.280, Credit, debit cards, checks, etc. - Definitions. (15) RCVV 9/\.56.330, Possession of another's identification. SECTION 5. Chapter 6, Article X, Section 6-243 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6-243 Sexual exploitation of children and minor access to erotic materials. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are hereby adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.68A.011, Definitions. (2) RCW 9.68A.080, Processors of depictions of minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct - Report required. (3) RCW 9.68A.090, Communication with minor for immoral purposes -- Penalties. í1l RCW 9.68A.150, Allowing minor on premises of live erotic performance. {§} {4j RCW 9.68A.160, Penalty. SECTION 6. Chapter 6, Article XI, Section 6-268 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6-268 Obstructing justice, criminal assistance, introducing contraband and related offenses. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) Title 7.80.160, Fail to siqn non traffic infraction í.~.lJ4 RCW 9.69.100, Withholding knowledge of felony involving violence - Penalty. @} ~ RCW 9A.72.010, Definitions. ffi ~RCW 9A.72.040, False swearing. {§} {4j RCW 9A.72.060, False swearing - Retraction. ORD# , PAGE 5 @) ~ RCW 9A.72.070, False swearing - Irregularities no defense. ill têj RCW 9A.72.080, Statement of what one does not known to be true. ill.) f71 RCW 9A.72.140, Jury tampering. ffi} {ß) RCW 9A.72.150, Tampering with physical evidence. í1Q} t9} RCW 9A.76.010, Definitions. í111 f-1-.Qj RCW 9A.76.020, Obstructing a public servant .L11.) (44j RCW 9A.76.030, Refusing to summon aid for a peace officer. ill) f4-2-) RCW 9A.76.040, Resisting arrest. f1.1} f-1-ð1 RCW 9A.76.050, Rendering criminal assistance - Definition of terms. f1§} f441 RCW 9A.76.060, Relative defined. (16) RCW 9A.76.070. Renderinq criminal assistance in the first deqree. ill1 ~ RCW 9A.76.080, Rendering criminal assistance in the second degree. í.1.ID f1-êj RCW 9A.76.090, Rendering criminal assistance in the third degree. í1ID ~ RCW 9A.76.100, Compounding. (20) ~ RCW 9A.76.160, Introducing contraband in the third degree. @ ~ RCW 9A.76.170, Bail jumping. (22) ~ RCW 9A.76.175, Making a false or misleading statement to a public servant. (23) t241 RCW 9A.84.040, False reporting. SECTION 7. Chapter 6, Article XIII, Section 6-316 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6-316 Conduct prohibited. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.91.010, Denial of civil rights - Terms defined. (2) RCW 9.91.020, Operating railroad, steamboat, vehicle, etc., while intoxicated. (3) RCW 9.91.025, Unlawful bus conduct. (4) RCW 9.91.110, Metal buyers - Records of purchases - Penalty. (5) RCW 9.03.010, Abandoning, discarding refrigeration equipment. , PAGE 6 ORD# (6) RCW 9.03.020, Permitting unused equipment to remain on premises. (7) RCW 9.03.030, Violation of RCW 9.03.010 or 9.03.020. (8) RCW 9.03.040, Keeping or storing equipment for sale. (9) RCW 9A.44.130. Reqistration of sex offenders and kidnappinq offenders -- Procedures -- Definition -- Penalties. f1QìRCW 9A.49.030, Unlawful discharge of a laser in the second degree. (11) RCW 28A.635.020. Willfully disobevinq school administrative personnel or refusinq to leave public property. violations. when -- Penalty. (12) RCW 28A.635.090. Interference bv force or violence -- Penalty. (13) RCW 28A.635.1 00. Intimidatinq any administrator. teacher, classified employee, or student bv threat of force or violence unlawful -- Penalty. (14) RCW 29A.84.250. Violations -- Corrupt practices. (15) RCW 29A.84.51 O. Acts prohibited in vicinity of pollinq place -- Prohibited practices as to ballots. f1ID fU)j RCW 42.20.010, Powers may not be delegated for profit. í1D M RCW 42.20.030, Intrusion into and refusal to surrender public office. f1.§l~ RCW 42.20.050, Public officer making false certificate. í1ill.J~-ð1 RCW 42.20.060, Falsely auditing and paying claims. í~Q1J~4j RCW 42.20.080, Other violations by officers. ~~RCW 42.20.100, Failure of duty by public officer is misdemeanor. SECTION 8. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion ofthis ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. SECTION 9. Ratification. Any and all acts consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance are hereby ratified and affirmed. ORD# , PAGE 7 SECTION 10. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from its passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this - day of ,2004. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, DEAN MCCOLGAN ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. K:\ORDI N\Criminal update '04 , PAGE 8 ORD#