Loading...
07-101136CITY OF Federal Way October 30, 2009 Thomas Nishimura The Nishimura Associates, LLC 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 CITY HALL FILE 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address. PO Sax 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.WYOffederalway. com RE: File #07-101136-00.Up; mIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY of GOD C 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way guReg (2007) Dear Mr. Nishimura: This design decision is issued for the above -referenced project pursuant t° Federal Way City Code (FWCC) ection 22-395, "Director's Decision"; and FWCC Article M. "Community 1]esign Guidelines",and FWCC 22-I359(e) "Structures, improvements and landsu�face mod cesinn within regulated wetland buffers —Buffer red�rction. " Proposed action is to replace an existing church facility with anew 40'x60' pre-engineered steel building with associated site inprovemeents. Project also Proposes to intrude into a I00' Category II Wetland buffer by up to 20'. Wetland mitigation planting has also been proposed as a part of this project. As this is a heavily constrained site due to wetland and stream buffers, future expansion of the church is not expected. The design decision and buffer reduction are two of three decisions required for this project pursuant to FWCC Section 22-431. The project is also subject to a Hearing Examiner Process IV decision. DESIGN & SUFFER REDUCTION APPROVAL ISSUANCE AND EFFECT' 1 • The Community Design Guidelines components of the project are hereby approved pursuant to decision criteria set forth in FWCC Article XIX. This decision is also based, in part, on the conclusions drawn from the Statement of pacts (Exhibit A) issued by the Department's Planning Division and Exhibit B & C prepared by The Nishimura Associates, stamped "Approved" an October 30, 2009. 2. The Director Of Community Development has hereby approved the Category II wetland buffer intrusion by up to 20 feet from the western boon forth in FWCC Section 22 t13 urn t(e). This n boundary is also of he �er pursuant to decision criteria set from the Statement of Facts (Exhibit.4) issued by the D per' °ri the conclusions drawn Plannin& C prepared by The Nishimura Associates, stamped "Approved-s on October n30, 2009. ivision and Exhibit B These decisions do not take effect unless and until the Hearing Examiner issues Process IV approval and it does not authorize the applicant to conduct any development activities on the site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL .As conditioned, the applicant shall: 1. Widen the pedestrian walkway front Military Road South to 6 feet wide. ` �. f�ishimura October 30, 2009 Page 2 2. Add pedestrian features such as benches, bike racks, and garbage receptacles. 3. A ermanent split tall fence must be installed along the Perimeter Mitigatvreduce �� d western Category II p as seen on redlined approved wetland wetland buffer boundary must be recorded prior to final building permit inspection to 4. A Boundary Line Adjustment (13LA) remove all underlying lot lines. These conditions of approval shall be reflected on the final construction drawing submitted with the applicant's building permit. STATE EN�oNMENTAL POLICY ACT TEMESHOLD DE ERRKM's Responsible Official issued a Pursuant to Washington Admi�tistrative Code i97-11-340, Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on September 16, 2009, with no comments or appeals filed. REQUESTS FOR CypNGE OF VALuATIO a change in valuation for property tax purposes, not Any affected property owners may request withstanding any program of revaluation. APPEALS be appealed by the applicant, anyone who Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-447, this decision may eel must be filed in submitted comments, or anyo thin 14halendar days of the issuance s specifically date of theecd the decision. The sion and must include writing with the City Clerk with eale - a copy of the decision; a statement of the following: a statement identifying the decssionbeing alp the alleged errors in the decision (including identification of specific hone number, and he ppli ableof g the decision being disputed}; the appellant s name, address, an p appeal fee. Any appeal of this decision will be heard by the Federal Way Hearing Examiner concurrently associated with the application. with the Process 1V hearing CLOSING specifications, and details are Information used in preparing the design decision such as drawings, available upon request during normal business hours8Federal W Department, WA 98063-9Community 8}. Copies f speci�fie Services (33325 a Avenue South, PO Box 97l , information may also be obtained by written request to the act David Lee,,Assoc ate Planner, td253 835- you have any questions regarding this decision, please coast 2622 or david.lee@cityof£ederalway.con' Sincerely, Greg Fewins, Director Community Development Services ENCLOSURES: Statement of Facts Site Plan — Sohemat'sc, Landscaping, Mitigation plans prepared by The Nishimura Associates Exhibit A: Exhibit B: prepared by The Nishimura Associates Exhibit C: Elevation Drawings c; David Lee, Associate Planner Doc. I.D. 51979 07-101136 CITY of Federal Exhibit A Statement of Facts FILE Administrative Approval Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church, File #07-101136-UP The Planning Division hereby presents the following statement of facts to the Director of Community Development pursuant to content requirements of the Community Design Guidelines decision as set forth in Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Article XIX. 1) Proposed action is to replace an exiting church facility with a new 40'x60' pre-engineered steel building with associated site improvements. Project also proposes to intrude into a 100' Category II Wetland buffer by up to 15'. Wetland mitigation planting has also been proposed as a part of this project. As this is a heavily constrained site due to wetland and stream buffers, future expansion of the church is not expected. 2) The applicant submitted a Process IV Hearing Examiner Master Land Use (MLU) application March 2, 2007. Prior to the Hearing Examiner's Process IV decision, the Director of Community Development Services shall issue a design decision pursuant to FWCC Section 22431. 3) The primary entrance to the structure is clearly visible from the right-of-way along Military Road South, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(1). There is a primary vehicular drop-off area on the north side of the structure, which is parallel to a pedestrian walkway, which connects to a primary pedestrian entrance from Military Road South Both of these pedestrian walkways lead to a main entrance parapet. 4) The proposal embodies overall design continuity. The architectural elements of the structure use a harmonized palate of colors, materials, and forms. The structure is designed to relate to the site shape and topography. The architectural style, features, materials, colors, and textures are appropriate for a church in a residential zone and they are consistent throughout the design. 5) Pedestrian pathways are incorporated into overall site design. The project provides for a main pedestrian connection between the church and the public right-of-way along Military Road South. The pathway is clearly visible from the right-of-way. The pedestrian pathway also cradles the main vehicular drop off area and connects to the pedestrian walkway to lead to the main entrance. All of the proposed six -foot -wide sidewalks are consistent with FWCC Section 22-1638(a)(8), which states that pedestrian walkways, a minimum of six feet wide, shall be provided between the interior of the project and the public sidewalk. The concrete for the sidewalks is to be colored. 6) Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(b), the project is exempt from building faoade modulation and screening options as the building fagade that is visible from the right-of-way is 40' wide and therefore does not meet the "longer than 60 feet" provision of this section. Statement of Facts Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Page 1 File #07-101136-UP/Doc. I.D. 51970 Roigni-&ant trees are proposed to be removed from the site. 8) Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1566(b), Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines of nonresidential uses in the RS zoning district, except in those areas where parking is adjacent to a residential zone. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1567(h)(2), in these areas the visual impact of parking areas shall be reduced by providing Type I landscaping within required perimeter landscape buffers. The site plan shows 20-foot-wide Type II landscaping along the western property line, and 10-foot- wide Type III landscaping along the north and south property line. Ten -foot -wide Type III landscaping along the eastern property line is not being required as there is a stream and wetland located on the eastern portion of the site and this area is being populated by wetland mitigation planting that will serve the same purpose as a 10-foot-wide Type III landscape. 9) The major facades of the church addition satisfy the design guidelines requirements for articulation as follows: • West Facade — This facade contains two different levels of pitched roofs, and the overall appearance of the roofs appears to have a 4:12 roof pitch. Architectural features such as the covered entry porch add to appearance of building modulation. Varied use of materials also contributes to building articulation. North/South Fagade— The area of the north facade that is visible from the right-of-way mimics the elements of the west facade in the area of the main entrance and meets the design requirements as identified above. The entry porch to the west of the building is visible from the right-of-way. The remainder of the north facade, which is not visible from the right-of-way, satisfies design guidelines as below. In that the south facade is not visible from a public area, it is not subject to the requirements of FWCC Section 22-1635(c). This facade is required to meet the standards in FWCC Section 22- 163 8(d), which requires all new buildings to appear to have a minimum roof pitch of 4:12, to be designed to have a "base, middle, and top," and to contain residential features. The proposed building provides a strong masonry base that ties the building together. The base incorporates contrasting colored bands of masonry to help reduce the scale and mass of the building. The middle section of the structure is simpler vertical slat type siding. The pitched roof, and residential features such as window trims and individual windows meet this articulation requirement. In addition, the masonry wainscot around the building is a technique used in residential architecture. 10) The applicant will construct a new paved parking area consisting of 32 stalls, two of which are ADA accessible. The parking lot design satisfies the Community Design Guidelines standards to have parking lots broken into rows containing no more than 10 adjacent stalls separated by planting areas, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1638(a)(7). All parking lot landscape islands meet the minimum size requirement of 64 square feet, and also meet the 640 square feet of parking lot landscaping required by FWCC Section 22-1567(b)(1). 11) Per FWCC Section 22-1359(e), the Category II 100' wetland buffer has been approved for reduction of up to 20'. The wetland buffer is currently being used as a recreational area. Additionally, a large Statement of Facts Page 2 Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church File #07-101136-UP/Doc. t.o 51970 35'x55' concrete slab rests within the western edge of the wetland buffer. The project includes a buffer enhancement plan which utilizes appropriate native vegetation and clearly substantiates that an enhanced buffer will improve and .provide additional protection of wetland functions and values. The eastern portion of the wetland is being re -populated with native vegetation such as weeping willows, snowberry, and sitka willows. The enhancement plan also calls for the removal of the concrete slab, and a permanent split rail wooden fence (with wetland signage) along the perimeter of the western edge of the wetland buffer, to prohibit further human usage of the wetland buffer. As stipulated by FWCC Section 22-1359(e)(2), the applicant has proven that the existing conditions are such that the required standard buffer exists in a permanently altered state, as evidenced by persistent human use and the concrete slab, which does not provide any buffer function. 12) An Environmental Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS, File #07-101137-00-SE) was issued for the project on September 16, 2009, with no comments or appeals submitted to the City. 13) Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-395(2)(b), the project is consistent with the comprehensive plan, consistent with all applicable provisions of the FWCC, consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare, the streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal, and the proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration. Statement of Facts Page 3 Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church File #07-101136-UP/Doe. i D 51970 FILE CRTY Of Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' Federal Way File No. 07-101136-00-UP PUBLIC HEARING November 25, 2009 2:00 p.m City Council Chambers Federal Way City Hall — 33325 8 h Avenue South Report Prepared by: David Lee, Associate Planner Report Date: November 10, 2009 Table of Contents I. PROJECT INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND................................................................................3 II. REQUESTED DECISION AND PROJECT PROPOSAL.......................................................................... 3 III. ENVIRONMENTAL REviEw..........................................................................................................4 N. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON LAND USE APPLICATION....................................................................4 V. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES................................................................................ 4 VI. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SITE AND VICINITY................................................................... 5 VII. SITE DESIGN................................................................................................................................ 5 VIII. COIvIIv1UNny DESIGN GUIDELINES............................................................................................... 6 IX. TRANSPORTATION.......................................................................................................................6 X. ANALYSIS OF FWCC 22-445(C) PROCESS W DECISION CRITERIA ................................................ 7 XI. STATEMENT OF FACTS & CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................... 9 XII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION........................................................................................................ 11 LISTOF EXHIBITS ............................. ...................................................................................................... 11 Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Page 2 Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' File No. 07-101136-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 51992 I. PROJECT INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND Name of Project: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church City File No(s): Process IV File 07-101136-UP & Environmental File 07-101137-SE Staff Recommendation: Approval with Conditions Summary of Proposal: Proposed action is to replace an existing church facility with a new 40'x60' pre-engineered steel building with associated site improvements. Due to the constrictive nature of the site, future expansion of the church is not expected. Site Location: 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA Applicant: Thomas Nishimura, The Nishimura Associates, 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220, Bellevue, WA 98005 Agent: Thomas Nishimura, The Nishimura Associates, 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220, Bellevue, WA 98005 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Designations: Multi -family — RM3600 Key Dates: Master Land Use Application: March 2, 2007 Application Determined Complete: March 29, 2007 Notice of Application: May 16, 2007 Community Design Guidelines Decision Issued: September 16, 2009 Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) Issued: October 30, 2009 Notice of Public Hearing: November 7, 2009 City Staff Representative: David Lee, Associate Planner, 253-835-2622 II. REQUESTED DECISION & PROJECT PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting a Process IV "Hearing Examiner" decision pursuant to Section 22-395 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). Applicants proposing church developments within single- family residential zoned neighborhoods shall submit a Process IV Master Land Use (MLU) application pursuant to FWCC Section 22-635 "Churches. " The applicant is exempt from obtaining a master plan approval as a component of the Process IV decision as the subject property is less than five acres. As shown on the site plan (Exhibit B), the project applicant proposes to construct a single -story, 40'x60' pre-engineered steel building to replace an existing church. Additional proposed site improvements concurrent with building construction include slight grading to accommodate: (1) new bioswale and stormwater dispersion trench; (2) parking lot area with designated drop-off zone, Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' Page 3 File No. 07-101136-00-UP/Doc.I.D. 51992 capacity to provide parking for 32 vehicles, lighting, and fenced garbage/recycling enclosure; (3) 30-foot-wide private driveway to Military Road South; (4) perimeter and parking lot landscaping; and (5) 9' right-of-way dedication and I F wide "Tract X" dedication. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed improvements exceed State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) flexible thresholds adopted by the city, specifically FWCC 18-73 "For office, commercial, recreational, service or storage buildings up to 4,000 square feet gross floor area, and up to 20 parking spaces." Therefore, an environmental threshold determination is required prior to any land use decision or building permit. a) Determination of Nonsignificance — Following staff review of the environmental checklist, the city's Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the proposal September 16, 2009 (Exhibit Q. Agencies with jurisdiction were notified of the determination and public notice was provided via procedures within the city's environmental policy. No comments or appeals were received regarding the environmental determination. b) Wetland — As shown on the city's critical areas map (Exhibit D), a Category II wetland and major stream is located on the eastern portion of the subject property. The applicant has proposed to intrude into the 100' wetland buffer by up to 20' into the western perimeter of the buffer. The request to intrude into the buffer was granted administratively per FWCC Section 22-1359(e). This decision is captured by the Design & Buffer Reduction Approval letter and Findings of Fact (Exhibit E); however, the decision does not take effect unless and until the Hearing Examiner issues Process IV approval. IV. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON LAND USE APPLICATION As of the date of this report, no comments have been received on the environmental threshold determination or the Process IV MLU application. V. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application: 1. Development Review Committee (DRC), consisting of Community Development Services Planning and Building Divisions; Public Works Development Services and Traffic Divisions; Lakehaven Utility District; and South King Fire and Rescue District. DRC comments have been incorporated into this report where applicable. 2. All property owners within 300 feet of the site were mailed the Notice of Application (NOA) December 10, 2008, and Notice of Public Hearing on October 17, 2009. The NOA and Notice of Public Hearing were posted on the site, published in the Federal Way Mirror, and posted on the City's official notice boards, in accordance with the City's public notice requirements. 3. In accordance with SEPA and FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy," all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site, and all affected agencies and tribes, were notified of the proposed action and the City's environmental determination. In addition, the site was posted and notice placed in the newspaper and on the City's official notice boards. Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Page 4 Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' File No. 07-101136-00-UP/nog. Ln. 51992 VI. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SITE AND VICINITY The subject property is comprised of two multi -family residential (RM3600) zoned parcels totaling 2.48 acres (108,028.80 square feet). Existing built environment includes one 1,378 square -foot structure along Military Road South. Surrounding land uses consist of multi -family residential (RM3600) to the north, east, and south. The western adjacent parcels are zoned RM1800 (multi- family residential). FWCC Section 22-671 allows church uses within RM3600 zones with Process IV land use approval. The 1973 Soil Conservation Survey of King County indicate the soils on the site consist of Alderwood (AgB), Arents Alderwood (AmB), and Orcas (Or). The site topography is generally flat. The site lies in a Level 1 flow control area, but qualifies for a 0.1 cfs exemption. No detention is required, but water quality treatment is required. A basic bioswale (outside of the wetland/stream buffer), coupled with a dispersion trench, is proposed to meet these requirements. VII. SITE DESIGN a) Church Building Improvements — Proposed action is to replace an exiting church facility with a new 40'x60' pre-engineered steel building with associated site improvements. Project also proposes to intrude into a 100' Category H wetland buffer by up to 20'. Wetland mitigation planting has also been proposed as a part of this project. As this is a heavily constrained site due to wetland and stream buffers, future expansion of the church is not expected. The proposed structure will contain multiple modulations and awnings. As shown on the site plan (Exhibit B), the furthest linear building dimensions measure 60 feet in length and 40 feet in width. As shown on the exterior elevation plans (Exhibit B), the proposed building will measure 18 feet above average building elevation and 21 feet at its highest point (ridge height). b) Stormwater Improvements — Pursuant to thresholds within FWCC Section 21-13, full drainage review is required, therefore, the applicant must comply with core and special requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Design Manual (KCSWDM) and Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM. The site lies in a Level 1 flow control area, but qualifies for a 0.1 cfs exemption. No detention is required, but water quality treatment is required. A basic bioswale, coupled with a dispersion trench, is proposed to meet these requirements. c) Parking Lot Improvements —Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-671, parking stall quantity for church uses is determined via Transportation Management Plan (TMP) analysis completed by a professional traffic engineer. As shown in the applicant's TMP (Exhibit F), 31 parking stalls are required to serve the 2,400 square -foot church. The applicant is proposing 32 parking stalls. Parking space and aisle dimensions shall be designed using the "Parking Lot Design Criteria" policy adopted by reference within FWCC Section 22-1441. Typical parking dimensions shown on the site plan are 9 feet wide and 18 feet long with 25-foot drive aisles. Space and aisle dimensions meet the above -referenced design criteria. Access to the parking area will be provided via a 30-foot-wide driveway off of Military Road South. Pedestrian pathways are provided for additional access. Internal parking aisles and vehicle drop-off area provide loop access resulting in improved circulation. Pedestrian areas are clearly marked using stamped concrete in asphalt areas. Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Page 5 Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' File No. 07-101136-00-UP/Doe. I D 51992 Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1567, parking areas that accommodate up to 49 stalls shall provide 20 square feet of Type IV landscaping within the surface parking lot area. As shown on the submitted landscape plan (Exhibit B), 840 square feet of interior lot landscaping is provided, exceeding the 640 square -foot minimum required. Parking areas adjacent to residential zones shall provide Type I landscaping within the required perimeter landscape areas. Further discussion on this requirement is detailed in the following landscaping section. d) Landscaping— Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1566(b), Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines of nonresidential uses in the RS zoning district, except in those areas where parking is adjacent to a residential zone. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22- 1567(h)(2), in these areas the visual impact of parking areas shall be reduced by providing Type I landscaping within required perimeter landscape buffers. The site plan shows 20-foot-wide Type II landscaping along the western property line, and 10- foot-wide Type III landscaping along the north and south property line. Ten -foot -wide Type III landscaping along the eastern property line is not being required as there is a stream and wetland located on the eastern portion of the site and this area is being populated by wetland mitigation planting that will serve the same purpose as a 10-foot-wide Type III landscape. A final landscape plan shall be submitted with the building permit application. Final inspection of the installed landscaping will be required prior to Certificate of Occupancy. e) Master Plan Approval— FWCC Section 22-671 requires the applicant obtain master plan approval through Process IV if the subject property is more than five acres. As the subject property (2.48 acres) does not exceed this threshold, this project is exempt from this requirement. VIII. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES Pursuant to Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' guidelines, the Director of Community Development Services issued a written decision regarding the application's Community Design Guidelines October 30, 2009 (Exhibit E). The effect of this decision is contingent upon Process IV project approval by the Hearing Examiner. Adoption of the design decision is included as a condition of Process IV approval, as recommended herein. IX. TRANSPORTATION a) Access — The applicant has provided vehicular/pedestrian access and circulation consistent with the goals and policies for Transportation, as set forth in Chapter 3 of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). The subject property has one vehicle access point to Military Road South. Pedestrian access is perpendicular to Military Road South (a principal arterial). b) The applicant submitted a Concurrency application, which has been reviewed by Public Works Traffic staff. The staff report of the Concurrency analysis identifies required mitigation measures for Process IV Project Approval, addresses any failures of the City's Level of Service (LOS) standard, and provides for the collection of pro-rata share mitigation towards the City's Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects impacted by the proposed development. The final staff evaluation for the Concurrency application, Federal Way File #07-101139-00-CN, is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. Prior to issuance of any construction permits for the proposed development, the applicant shall pay at the maximum the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Page 6 Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' File No. 07-101136-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 51992 project pro-rata share contribution in the amount of $3,428.00 to the City in order to mitigate the impacts of 3 new trips generated by the project and meeting the LOS standards. Transportation Improvement Plan projects impacted are listed below. The fees owed are subject to change. Map TIP PROJECTS 20 Milit Rd S: S Star Lake Rd - S 288th St Widen to 5 lanes, sidewalks, street li is 3,428 c) Public Improvements — Military Road South is classified as an arterial street corresponding to Federal Way Roadway Section "K". This roadway section requires a 44-foot-wide paved street with vertical curbs, six-foot planter strip, eight -foot sidewalk, three-foot utility strip, street lighting, and street trees all within a 78-foot right-of-way. This road section is also listed in the City's adopted Capital Improvement Plan for 2009-2020 (adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, Table IQ-19) with a project description requiring five lanes. This project will require a minimum of 100 feet of right-of-way to meet the necessary needs of the proposed improvements. The existing right-of-way width on Military Road South across the frontage of the property is 60 feet. This width is inadequate based on the planned road sections listed above. Therefore, based on FWCC 22-1474(c), the City will require the following right-of-way dedication and land set aside: ■ Dedicate a nine -foot -wide portion of the subject property parallel to the right-of-way and extending across the entire property frontage for right-of-way purposes. ■ Set aside an 11-foot wide portion of the subject property parallel to the right-of-way portion described above, extending across the entire property frontage. This area shall be set aside as a "Tract X", which is reserved for future right-of-way. The City will provide a Tract X agreement for signature approvals prior to the issuance of a building permit. After evaluating the existing conditions along Military Road South, review of Federal Way City Code provisions (Sections 22-1496, 22-1477), and the direction provided by the City Council, the Public Works Department hereby modified the requirements as follows: No physical improvements to Military Road South are required. The applicant shall sign a No Protest to Local Improvement District Agreement prior to the issuance of a building permit. X. ANALYSIS OF FWCC 22-445(C) - PROCESS IV DECISIONAL CRITERIA Process IV Decision Criteria - The applicant must meet five decisional criteria pursuant to FWCC 22-445(c). Staff has provided the following analysis of Process IV criteria: 1. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff Response - This criterion has been met. The comprehensive plan is used, among other documents, as a basis for implementing regulations such as zoning, critical areas requirements, and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The proposed church site improvement has undergone site plan review, environmental review, and must comply with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). The Process IV request was reviewed and determined to be consistent with the following goals and policies contained in FWCP: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Page 7 Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' File No. 07-101136-00-UP/Doc I D 51992 a) Policy 2. S Urban Design and Form; "Improve the appearance and function of the built environment" (Policy LUGI). Staff Response — The proposed church building and associated site improvements comply with current zoning and development codes. b) Policy 2.8 Land Use Designations; "Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non- residential uses" (Policy LUP15). Staff Response — The proposed perimeter landscaping will provide adequate screening of the church use. Future frontage improvements and traffic mitigation funds will mitigate traffic impacts. c) Policy 6.5 Capital Facilities Goals and Policies; "Provide the capital facilities needed to serve the future growth anticipated by the FWCP" (Policy CFP 13). Staff Response — The dedication of 9 feet of right-of-way abutting Military Road South will provide adequate space for future improvements as referenced in the city's six -year Transportation Improvement Plan. Additionally, the applicant shall pay at the maximum the project pro-rata share contribution in the amount of $3,428.04 to the City in order to mitigate the impacts of 3 new trips generated by the project and meeting the LOS standards. 2. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of this chapter and all other applicable laws. Staff Response - This criterion has been met. The Process IV request has been reviewed under SEPA; the FWCP; all applicable provisions of FWCC including Chapter 18 "Environmental Policy, Chapter 21 "Surface Water Management" and Chapter 22, "Zoning" and is consistent with all applicable provisions and laws, provided all recommended conditions of approval are met. 3. It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff Response - This criterion has been met. The proposed church improvements are consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The proposal will provide adequate and safe pedestrian circulation via delineated pathways within the subject property and to adjacent streets and sidewalks. Right-of-way dedication and improvements will provide adequate capacity to the adjacent street system. No adverse impacts to adjacent parcels are anticipated as a result of the proposal. The Process IV request has been reviewed under SEPA; the FWCP; all applicable provisions of FWCC; and construction permit plans will be reviewed utilizing the 2006International Building Code. Proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions and laws, provided all recommended conditions of approval are met. 4. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal. Staff Response - This criterion has been met. No significant adverse transportation impacts were identified by the City of Federal Way in the Concurrency analysis or DNS issued for the proposed action. Through the city's transportation concurrency management policy, the Traffic Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Page 8 Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' File No. 07-101136-00-UP/no.. i.n. 51992 Division has determined right-of-way dedication and contribution to the four referenced TIP projects will adequately mitigate any level of service deficiencies. The city's water/sewer purveyor, Lakehaven Utility District, issued certificates of water/sewer availability. 5. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. Staff Response - This criterion has been met. The proposed vehicle access point will provide adequate circulation for entering/exiting vehicles. The subject property is adjacent to and has access to a principal arterial (Military Road South) meeting the FWCC 22-671(3) requirement. Pedestrian access will be provided via a delineated stamped concrete walkway within the asphalt parking/driveway areas and textured concrete pathways throughout the subject property. XI. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS Based on an analysis of the Process IV application, the environmental record, and applicable decisional criteria, the Department of Community Development Services finds that: a) Proposed improvements require review under the city's land use Process IV `Hearing Examiner' pursuant to provisions outlined in FWCC Section 22-671 `Required Review Process.' Applicable regulations and policies used to review the proposal included, but were not limited to: Federal Way City Code Chapters 18, 21, and 22; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual with Federal Way Addendum; Public Works Department Development Standards; and State Environmental Policy Act rules Chapter 197-11. b) Proposed action is to replace an existing church facility with a new 40'x60' pre-engineered steel building with associated site improvements. Project also proposes to intrude into a 100' Category II wetland buffer by up to 20'. Wetland mitigation planting has also been proposed as a part of this project. As this is a heavily constrained site due to wetland and stream buffers, future expansion of the church is not expected. c) Following review of the proposal and environmental reports submitted by the applicant, the city's Responsible Official issued a Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) September 16, 2009. No comments or appeals were received regarding the environmental threshold determination. d) A Design Decision and administrative buffer reduction was granted under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-395, "Director's Decision"; and FWCC Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines", and FWCC 22-1359(e) "Structures, improvements and land surface modification within regulated wetland buffers — Buffer reduction. " e) The following are general dimensional regulations pursuant to FWCC Section 22-671 "Use Zone Chart." i. Minimum Lot Size — 7,200 square feet / Proposal — 108,028.80 square feet ii. Required Yards (setbacks) — 30 feet front, 30 feet side, and 30 feet rear / Proposal: 6Q feet front, 50 feet south side, 227 feet north side, and 209 feet rear iii. Lot Coverage — 75 percent maximum / Proposal - 18 percent iv. Height — 30 feet ABE / Pr osal — 18 feet ABE 21-foot ridge height) Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' Page 9 File No. 07-101136-00-UP/Do. ID 51992 The proposed site plan meets lot size, required yard, lot coverage, and height requirements. f) FWCC Section 22-671(3) requires church uses within RM zones abut collectors or arterial rights -of -way. The subject property is adjacent to Military Road South, which is designated as a Principal Arterial by the FWCP. g) Applicant will dedicate a nine -foot -wide portion of the subject property parallel to the right-of- way and extending across the entire property frontage for right-of-way purposes. Additionally, the applicant will set aside an 11-foot-wide portion of the subject property parallel to the right- of-way portion described above, extending across the entire property frontage. This area shall be set aside as a "Tract X", which is reserved for future right-of-way. The City will provide a Tract X agreement for signature approvals prior to the issuance of a building permit. No physical improvements to Military Road South will be required of the applicant at time of construction. The applicant shall sign a No Protest to Local Improvement District Agreement prior to the issuance of a building permit. h) The church improvements will generate 3 new peak hour trips that will affect one project adopted in the city's six year TIP. The applicant will be required to provide a pro-rata share contribution in the amount of $3,428.00 to mitigate impacts to level of service standards. i) The amount of proposed impervious surfaces required full drainage review by the Public Works Department. The subject property is within an area designated Level 1 Flow Control and Basic Water Quality, which requires the applicant to design a stormwater facility meeting the applicable requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Flow control and water quality requirements will be met via on -site bioswale and dispersion trench. j) The applicant's traffic engineer has provided analysis that 31 parking stalls will adequately serve full occupancy of the church. The site plan exceeds the recommendation and provides 32 parking stalls. k) FWCC Section 22-671(1) requires all church proposals on property greater than five acres obtain master plan approval as a component of the Process IV decision. As the site is less than five acres (2.48 acres), it is exempt from this requirement. 1) The Director of Community Development Services has found the proposal meets applicable requirements of FWCC Article XIX "Community Design Guidelines" and issued Design Approval October 30, 2009. A wetland buffer reduction of up to 20 feet was also granted per FWCC Section 22-1359(e) under the same approval. The effect of this decision is contingent upon Process IV project approval by the Hearing Examiner. No appeals of the decision were filed with the city. m) Final engineering and construction plans related, but not limited to buildings, roads, stormwater and lighting will be reviewed during the building permit stage and must meet all applicable Public Works Department Development Standards and the 2006 International Building Code standards adopted by the Department of Community Development Services Building Division. n) As analyzed previously, city staff has concluded that the church improvements have met all Process IV decisional criteria pursuant to FWCC Section 22-445(c). Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Page 10 Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' File No. 07-101136-00-UP/no.. I.D. 51992 I XII. STAFF RE owgENDATION Based on analysis derived from this report, the Department of Community Development Services recommends approval of the site improvements as depicted on the site plan (Exhibit B), subject to the conditions listed below: The applicant shall obtain engineering approval from the Public Works Department and commercial building approval from the Department of Community Development Services prior to site construction. 2. The applicant shall pay the traffic mitigation pro-rata share contribution of $3,428.00 prior to building permit issuance. Applicant shall dedicate a nine -foot -wide portion of the subject property parallel to the right-of- way and extending across the entire property frontage for right-of-way purposes. Additionally, the applicant will set aside an 11-foot-wide portion of the subject property parallel to the right- of-way portion described above, extending across the entire property frontage. This area shall be set aside as a "Tract V, which is reserved for future right-of-way. The City will provide a Tract X agreement for signature approvals prior to the issuance of a building permit. No physical improvements to Military Road South will be required of the applicant at time of construction. The applicant shall sign a No Protest to Local Improvement District Agreement prior to the issuance of a building permit. LIST OF EXHIBITS Note: Copies of the exhibits listed below are not attached to all copies of this report. All exhibits have been provided to the Hearing Examiner. Copies of exhibits may be obtained upon request at the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services. Exhibit A Technical Information Report Exhibit B Site, Landscaping, and Elevation Plans by Nishimura Associates, Date Stamped Approved October 30, 2009 Exhibit C Determination ofNonsigaificance September 16, 2009 Exhibit D Critical Areas Map Section Exhibit E Design and Buffer Reduction Approval, Dated October 30, 2009 Exhibit F Parking Study by Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc., Prepared October 30, 2006 YkANsA,ffTTED To THE PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: Hearing Examiner — Phil Olbrechts, Ogden Murphy Wallace, 16015th Avenue, Suite 2100, Seattle, WA 98101 Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' Page 11 File No. 07-101136-00-UP/Doc I.D. 51992 J,S,AAdoI f s o � June 5, 2007 Mr. Andy Bergsagel City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 phone 206.789.9684 fax www.adoffson.com OOMML1N17YSCOVED BY DEELOPME TT DEPARTMENT .SUN 12 2007 Subject: Wetland Boundary and Classification Review, Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (File #07-101136-00-UP), Federal Way, Washington Dear Andy: ESA Adolfson (Adolfson) is pleased to present our review of the application materials submitted to the City of Federal Way (City) for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church. The 1.99-acre site is located at 29276 Military Road South in the City of Federal Way, Washington. An existing church and single-family dwelling is located in the western portion of the property. The remainder of the property is undeveloped, and consists of a grass field with scattered trees. The church is proposing to remove the existing buildings and construct a new church on the site. Review comments included in this letter are based on regulatory requirements presented in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22-Critical Areas Regulations, a review of materials provided by the applicant, and a site visit conducted in May 2007. The scope of this review is limited to an evaluation of the delineated wetland boundary and wetland classification. Review of Documents For this sensitive area review, Adolfson evaluated the following materials received from the City on March 29, 2007: • Midway Samoan Church Wetland Delineation Report (Genesis Resource Consulting [GRC], March 31, 2006); and • Survey drawings (Dan Price Land Surveying, November 27, 2005). The wetland delineation report identifies one wetland in the eastern third of the property, which extends offsite to the north, east, and south. The report states that the wetland meets Category III wetland criteria. The survey drawings show the existing structures on the project site, the proposed building, an offsite stream, and the location of the wetland. City policy requires that the wetland boundary be professional surveyed; however, the boundary appears to have been hand -sketched on the survey drawing sheets. r ESA Samoan Church wetland review June 5, 2007 Page 2 of 3 Site Visit Adolfson scientist Lara Thoreson and I conducted a site visit on May 24, 2007 to verify the boundary and classification of the onsite wetland. The majority of the site consists of mowed grasses, with a few scattered ornamental trees. Two existing buildings and a parking lot are located on the western portion of the site. Adolfson verified the approximate location of the wetland delineated by GRC. The onsite portion of the wetland is dominated by reed canarygrass, creeping buttercup, and soft rush. Offsite to the north, the wetland is dominated by willows, and areas of ponded water were observed during the site visit. The wetland is contiguous with a stream, which is located east of the project site. None of the wetland boundary flags placed by GRC were observed at the site; it appears that the flags were removed or mowed over. Due to the absence of boundary flags, Adolfson was unable to verify the wetland boundary. Near the northern property boundary, extending west to east, Adolfson observed a linear swale area that appears to meet wetland criteria. The soil within the swale is a black (IOYR 2/1) loam, which is considered hydric. The swale area contains a hydrophytic vegetation community, dominated by Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass, and creeping buttercup. Soils within the area were moist, but not saturated. However, it is likely that soils within the swale may be saturated at or near the surface in the early spring. Regulatory Considerations The wetland delineation report states that the onsite wetland meets the criteria for Category III. However, FWCC 22-1357 states that Category II wetlands "are contiguous with water bodies or tributaries to water bodies which under normal circumstances contain or support a fish population." The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has identified the stream to the east of the wetland as coho salmon and cutthroat trout habitat. Therefore, the onsite wetland should be considered Category II, which receives a standard buffer width of 100 feet under the FWCC (22-1357). Recommendations • In order to verify the wetland boundary, the delineation flags should be replaced. Given that the wetland boundary area appears to be regularly mowed, the boundary should be verified shortly after the flags are replaced. We recommend that the applicant's wetland consultant schedule an appointment for the wetland verification. In addition, the wetland flags should remain in place until the City makes a decision regarding the wetland classification and wetland buffer width. ESA 1 Samoan Church wetland review June 5, 2007 Page 3 of 3 • The wetland boundary should be professionally surveyed, as required by City policy. • The swale area near the northern property boundary should be re-examined for wetland characteristics. • In accordance with FWCC 22-1357, the onsite wetland should be described in all application project documents as a Category II wetland. Category II wetlands receive a standard buffer width of 100 feet. ■ Any proposed impacts to the wetland or wetland buffer should be mitigated per FWCC 22- 1358/1359. Limitations Within the limitations of schedule, budget, and scope -of -work, we warrant that this review was conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental science practices, including the technical guidelines and criteria in effect at the time this study was performed. The results and conclusions of this report represent the authors' best professional judgment, based upon information provided by the project proponent in addition to that obtained during the course of this review. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this material for you. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 206-789-9658. Sincerely, Project Scientist cc: Lizzie Zemke, Project Manager CITY OF CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Ak Federa l Way Mailing Address: 98 Box 98 ��.•++�� Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com October 30, 2009 Thomas Nishimura PAGE_J_0F_.S The Nishimura Associates, LLC 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Nishim a: This design decision is issued for the above -referenced project pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-395, "Director's Decision"; and FWCC Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines", and FWCC 22-1359(e) "Structures, improvements and land surface modification within regulated wetland buffers — Buffer reduction. " Proposed action is to replace an existing church facility with a new 40'x60' pre-engineered steel building with associated site improvements. Project also proposes to intrude into a 100' Category H Wetland buffer by up to 20'. Wetland mitigation planting has also been proposed as a part of this project. As this is a heavily constrained site due to wetland and stream buffers, future expansion of the church is not expected. The design decision and buffer reduction are two of three decisions required for this project pursuant to FWCC Section 22-431. The project is also subject to a Hearing Examiner Process IV decision. DESIGN & BUFFER REDUCTION APPROVAL ISSUANCE AND EFFECT 1. The Community Design Guidelines components of the project are hereby approved pursuant to decision criteria set forth in FWCC Article M. This decision is also based, in part, on the conclusions drawn from the Statement of Facts (ExhibitA) issued by the Department's Planning Division and Exhibit B & C prepared by The Nishimura Associates, stamped "Approved" on October 30, 2009. 2. The Director of Community Development has hereby approved the Category II wetland buffer intrusion by up to 20 feet from the western boundary of the buffer pursuant to decision criteria set forth in FWCC Section 22-1359(e). This decision is also based, in part, on the conclusions drawn from the Statement of Facts (Exhibit A) issued by the Department's Planning Division and Exhibit B & C prepared by The Nishimura Associates, stamped "Approved" on October 30, 2009. These decisions do not take effect unless and until the Hearing Examiner issues Process IV approval and it does not authorize the applicant to conduct any development activities on the site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL As conditioned, the applicant shall: 1. Widen the pedestrian walkway from Military Road South to 6 feet wide. ' Mr. Nishimlra EXHIBIT October 30, 2009 Page 2 PAGE GF--_- 2. Add pedestrian features such as benches, bike racks, and garbage receptacles. 3. A permanent split rail fence must be installed along the perimeter of the reduced western Category 11 wetland buffer boundary as seen on redlined approved wetland mitigation plan. 4. A Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) must be recorded prior to final building permit inspection to remove all underlying lot lines. These conditions of approval shall be reflected on the final construction drawing submitted with the applicant's building permit. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11-340, the city's Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on September, 16, 2009, with no comments or appeals filed. REQUESTS FOR CHANGE OF VALUATION Any affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes, not withstanding any program of revaluation. APPEALS Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-447, this decision may be appealed by the applicant, anyone who submitted comments, or anyone who has specifically requested the decision. The appeal must be filed in writing with the City Clerk within 14 calendar days of the issuance date of the decision and must include the following- a statement identifying the decision being appealed; a copy of the decision; a statement of the alleged errors in the decision (including identification of specific factual findings and conclusions of the decision being disputed); the appellant's name, address, and telephone number; and the applicable appeal fee. Any appeal of this decision will be heard by the Federal Way Hearing Examiner conctuxently with the Process IV hearing associated with the application. CLOSING Information used in preparing the design decision such as drawings, specifications, and details are available upon rcqucst during normal business hours at the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8`f' Avenue South, PO Box 9719, FederalWay, 'LAVA 98063-9718). Copies of specific information may also be obtained by written request to the City Clerk at the above -referenced address. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact David Lee, Associate Planner, at 253-835- 2622 or david.lee@cityoffederalway.com Sincerely, /Yj Greg Fewins, Director Community Development Services ENCLOSURES: Exhibit A- Statement of Facts Exhibit B: Site Plan — Schematic, Landscaping, Mitigation plans prepared by The Nishimura Associates Exhibit C: Elevation Drawings prepared by The Nishimura Associates c: David Lee, Associate Planner 07-10L136 Doc. ID 51979 CITY OF ay EXH.JBr,Federal W _ -- Exhibit A PAGEI-OF-S Statement of Facts Administrative Approval Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church, File #07-101136-UP The Planning Division hereby presents the following statement of facts to the Director. of Community Development pursuant to content requirements of the Community Design Guidelines decision as set forth in Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Article XDC 1) 'Proposed action is to replace an exiting church facility with anew 40'x60' pre-engineered steel building with associated site improvements. Project also proposes to intrude into a 100' Category H Wetland buffer by up to 15'. Wetland mitigation planting has also been proposed as apart of this project. As this is a heavily constrained site due to wetland and stream buffers, future expansion of the church is not expected. 2) The applicant submitted a Process IV Hearing Examiner Master Land Use (MLU) application March 2, 2007. Prior to the Hearing Examiner's Process IV decision, the Director of Community Development Services shall issue a design decision pursuant to FWCC Section 22-431. 3) The primary entrance to the structure is clearly visible from the right-of-way along Military Road South, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(1). There is a primary vehicular drop-off area m the north side of the structure, which is parallel to a pedestrian walkway, which connects to a primary pedestrian entrance from Military Road South. Both of these pedestrian walkways lead to a main entrance parapet. 4) The proposal embodies overall design continuity. The architectural elements of the structure use a barmonized palate of colors, materials, and forms. The structure is designed to relate to the site shape and topography. The architectural style, features, materials, colors, and textures are appropriate for a church in a residential zone and they are consistent throughout the design. 5) Pedestrian pathways are incorporated into overall site design. The project provides for a main pedestrian connection between the church and the public right-of-way along Military Road South. The pathway is clearly visible from the right-of-way. The pedestrian pathway also cradles the main vehicular drop off area and connects to the pedestrian walkway to lead to the main entrance. All of the proposed six -foot -wide sidewalks are consistent with FWCC Section 22-1638(a)(8), which states that pedestrian walkways, a minimum of six feet wide, shall be provided between the interior of the project and the public sidewalk. The concrete for the sidewalks is to be colored. 6) Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(b), the project is exempt from building fagade modulation and screening options as the building fagade that is visible from the right-of-way is 40' wide and therefore does not meet the "longer than 60 feet" provision of this section. Statement of Facts Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Page 1 File #07-101136-UP/mc. Ln. 51970 EXHIBIT P�CaE OF--_: -- 7) No significant trees are proposed to be removed from tlae site. 8) Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1566(b), Type III landscaping 10 feet in width shall be provided along all property lines of nonresidential uses in the RS zoning district, except in those areas where parking is adjacent to a residential zone. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1567(h)(2), in these areas the visual impact of parking areas shall be reduced by providing Type I landscaping within required perimeter landscape buffers. The site plan shows 20-foot-wide Type U landscaping along the western property line, and 10-foot- wide Type III landscaping along the north and south property line. Ten -foot -wide Type III landscaping along the eastern property line is not being required as there is a stream and wetland located on the eastern portion of the site and this area is being populated by wetland mitigation planting that will serve the same purpose as a 10-foot-wide Type Ill landscape. 9) The major facades of the church addition satisfy the design guidelines requirements for articulation as follows: Nest Facade — This facade contains two different levels of pitched roofs, and the overall appearance of the roofs appears to have a 4:12 roof pitch. Architectural features such as the covered entry porch add to appearance of building modulation. Varied use of materials also contributes to building articulation. North/South FaVade— The area of the north facade that is visible from the right-of-way mimics the elements of the west facade in the area of the main entrance and meets the design requirements as identified above. The entry porch to the west of the building is visible from the right-of-way. The remainder of the north facade, which is not visible from the right-of-way, satisfies design guidelines as below. In that the south facade is not visible from a public area, it is not subj ect to the requirements of FWCC Section 22-1635(c). This facade is required to meet the standards in FWCC Section 22- 1638(d), which requires all new buildings to appear to have a minimum roof pitch of 4:12, to be designed to have a "base, middle, and top," and to contain residential features. The proposed building provides a strong masonry base that ties the building together. The base incorporates contrasting colored bands of masonry to help reduce the scale and mass of the building. The middle section of the structure is simpler vertical slat type siding. The pitched roof, and residential features such as window trims and individual windows meet this articulation requirement. In addition, the masonry wainscot around the building is a technique used in residential architecture. 10) The applicant will construct a new paved parking area consisting of 32 stalls, two of.which are ADA accessible. The parking lot design satisfies the Community Design Guidelines standards to have parking lots broken into rows containing no more than 10 adjacent stalls separated by planting areas, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1638(a)(7). All parking lot landscape islands meet the minimum size requirement of 64 square feet, and also meet the 640 square feet of parking lot landscaping required by FWCC Section 22-1567(b)(1). 11) Per FWCC Section 22-1359(e), the Category II 100' wetland buffer has been approved for reduction of up to 20'. The wetland buffer is currently being used as a recreational area. Additionally, a large Statement of Facts Page 2 Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church File ##07-101136-UP/nog. i D. 51970 35'x55' concrete slab rests within the western edge of the wetland buffer. The project includes a buffer enhancement plan which utilizes, appropriate native vegetation and clearly substantiates that an enhanced buffer will improve and provide additional protection of wetland functions and values. The eastern portion of the wetland is being re -populated with native vegetation such as weeping willows, snowberry, and sitka willows. The enhancement plan also calls for the removal of the concrete slab, and a permanent split rail wooden fence (with wetland signage) along the perimeter of the western edge of the wetland buffer, to prohibit further human usage of the wetland buffer. As stipulated by FWCC Section 22-1359(e)(2), the applicant has proven that the existing conditions are such that the required standard buffer exists in a permanently altered state, as evidenced by persistent human use and the concrete slab, which does not provide any buffer fimction. 12) An Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS, File #07-101137-00-SE) was issued for the project on September 16, 2009, with no comments or appeals submitted to the City. 13) Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-395(2)(b), the project is consistent with the comprehensive plan, consistent with all applicable provisions of the FWCC, consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare, the streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal, and the proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration. Statement of Facts Page 3 Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church File #07-101136-UP/noo. LD 51970 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at 2:00 p.m, or shortly thereafter, on November 25, 2009, in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063) for the following project, in accordance with Federal Way Code. Project Name: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Description: The applicant proposes to replace an existing church facility with a new 40'x60' pre- engineered steel building with associated site improvements. Project Location: 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA 98023 Applicant: The Nishimura Associates, 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220, Bellevue, WA 98005 Owner: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church, 29276 Military Road South File No: 07-101136-00-UP Application Received: March 2, 2007 Determined Complete: March 29, 2007 Notice of Application: November 4, 2009 Public Hearing Process: Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing, or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hearing Examiner will issue a recommendation on the Use Process N application within ten working days after the close of the hearing. Any person has the right to request a copy of the Hearing Examiner's decision. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. The application is to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file for the above project is available for review during business hours at the permit counter at City Hall, 33325 8ffi Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063. The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Questions regarding this project should be directed to David Lee, Associate Planner, at 253-835-2622. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 4, 2009. 07-101136 Doc LD 51997 CITY OF ti Federal Way July 2, 2009 Thomas Nishimura The Nishimura Associates, LLC 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 CITY HALL AIL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD C$URCH (2007) 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Nishimura: On May 13, 2009, the City received resubmitted plans regarding the proposed new church and associated site improvements. The following technical comments must be addressed prior to any further action on this application. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED Development Services, Ann Dower (253-835-2732, ann.dower(gcityoffederalway.com) 1. King County Assessor's information shows that the property on which the stormwater outfall is shown is not owned by the Midway Samoan Church. A public hearing and Hearing Examiner approval will be required to run pipe through the streambuffer and discharge directly to the stream. An easement or proof of ownership must be provided prior to the public hearing. 2. One of the conditions for a peak flow exemption is the use of BMP's to disperse or infiltrate water. Please include BMP's for the runoff from the roof and parking area. The bioswale is a treatment method, but is not considered a flow control BMP. The tightline and rock outfall provide neither treatment nor flow control, and creates a point discharge that_is discouraged. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-34, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you should have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please feel free to contact me at david.lee@cityoffederalway.com or at 253-835-2622. Sincerel . David Lee Associate Planner Doc I D 50648 Narrative Buffer Intrusion The proposed buffer intrusion of approximately 1,175 square feet by the parking lot and approximately 650 square feet for construction of the stormwater system is more than compensated for by the demolition and removal of the 1,925 square feet existing concrete pad, which is located within the proposed buffer. Although the entire proposed buffer has been historically used as a playground, and was cleared prior to a 1959 (aerial photo) the church will voluntarily plant approved groundcovers, shrubs and trees to revegetate any disturbed areas within the buffer. The parking facility, due to the proposed 11 foot tract x and 9 feet for additional right- of-way, cannot be built to accommodate the required number of vehicles without marginally intruding into the buffer. Likewise, the historic discharge point for the site requires location of a pipe and outfall in the buffer. As mentioned, any disturbance will be mitigated with landscaping. RESUBMITTED SEP 0 1 2009 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. The 1Vishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment May 8, 2009 Mr. David Lee Associate Planner City of Federal Way P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 RE: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007), 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way Responses to comments received October 20, 2008 from David Lee File #07-101136-00-UP; Request for Information Dear Mr. Lee, In response to the comments you sent to us on October 20, 2008 requesting further information, the answers are below in bold italics underneath the original question/comment received. 1. Item#2 — Response on the applicant's resubmittal narrative (resubmitted August 1, 2008) states that elevations were resubmitted. However, no elevation plans were included with the resubmittal package. Only civil plans sheets C-101 through C-104 were resubmitted. Please submit a full set of updated plans including the aforementioned elevation plans. Please find enclosed elevations which show requested additional architect articulation to the building fagade. 2. The ESA Adolfson review (dated June 4, 2007) of the applicant's submitted wetland study (Genesis Resource Consulting) concluded that the wetland in question is a Class II wetland with a 100-foot buffer. The plans submitted on August 1, 2008, now properly show the 100-foot buffer. From the narrative the applicant provided ("Item 3 Response"), it is assumed that the applicant wishes to request a buffer reduction pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1359(e). Although many areas of the required standard buffer permanently exist in an altered state, the applicant nonetheless is providing a plan to mitigate and enhance the very minor buffer intrusion, and will remove the existing concrete court and debris. The director of community development may reduce the standard wetland buffer width by up to 50%, but in no case to less than 25 feet, on a case -by -case basis, if the project includes a buffer enhancement plan that utilizes appropriate native vegetation and clearly substantiates than an enhanced buffer will improve and provide additional protection of wetland functions and values, and where one of the following conditions can be demonstrated: RESUBMITTED MAY 1 3 2009 Environmental lopm nt&M Management CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Project Development &Management 12737 Bel — Red Rd., Suite 220 • (425) 453.4886 • Cellular (206) 310.2820 • Fax (425) 453.4889 BUILDING D EPT. 311 South Lehua Street Kahului, Maui, HI 96732 • (808) 871.5701 The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment 1. Existing conditions are such that the required standard buffer exists in a permanently altered state (e.g., roadways, paved parking lots, permanent structures, etc.) that does not provide any buffer function, and then the buffer can be reduced for that portion where the intrusions are existing. 2. Except for Category I wetlands, existing conditions are such that the wetland has been permanently impacted by adjacent development activities, as evidenced by such things as persistent human alterations or the dominance of non-native invasive species. The director shall have the authority to determine if buffer averaging is warranted on the subject property and, if so, may require additional buffer area on the other portions of the perimeter of the sensitive area. Therefore, please prepare and submit a formal request for buffer reduction. This request should include an updated assessment of the Category II wetland, a buffer enhancement plan, a narrative explaining how it meets one of the two criteria of FWCC Section 22-1359(e), and a proposal of how much the buffer needs to be reduced. Please also remember that the request must entail ALL intrusions int o the wetland and wetland buffer, including stormwater systems and piping. A higher land use process (Land Use Process IV/Hearing Examiner) is needed when intruding into the actual wetland or encroachment into a wetland buffer that has been reduced down to the very minimum. The report must be prepared by a wetland biologist, and will be reviewed by the city's wetland consultant. There is still an outstanding balance of $2,108 owed to the city for the initial peer review (completed be ESA Adolfson) of the wetland study done by Genesis Resource Consulting. Please pay this amount immediately. A copy of the invoice and email has been enclosed with this letter. Please also be aware that additional consultant review fees will be necessary to complete the review of any future resubmitted wetland reports. A cost estimate will be provided shortly after (to the applicant) once the wetland report has been resubmitted. The church believes it has paid the balance owed. Development Services, Ann Dower (253-835-2732, ann.dower2cityoffederalway.com) Please provide the following revisions: The applicant did not provide an easement as requested for the sanitary sewer connection to the existing manhole. The easement must be in a place prior to the approval of the engineering plans. The plans now show a 10 foot easement for the sewer connection. A legal description and recorded easement will be included in the final engineering plans. The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment TIR The outfall for the storm system is shown on the neighboring property and within the 100-foot stream buffer. In this location, the applicant will need Hearing Examiner approval of the outfall and a recorded easement prior to approval of the engineering plans. The effect on the downstream flooding problems will be factored into any decision. The applicant owns both pieces of property; therefore an easement is not required. The potential effect of the downstream flooding problems has been addressed in the T.I.R. The TIR has conflicting information regarding the outfall, stating that it will be dispersed (p.9) and that it can't be dispersed (p.41). In discussing this threshold with Steve Foley of King County, he pointed out that the 0.5 cfs threshold applies at the property line. Dispersion can be allowed with a 100' vegetated flow path between the dispersion trench and the property line. See figure 4.2.2.0 for design details. At least 100 feet of vegetated flow path (preferably more) is also favored by staff to reduce and/or eliminate any downstream impact. We propose to discharge the bioswale via tightline to the existing stream (see Civil Plan Sheet C-104). We have amended TIR pg. 9 and 23 accordingly. Page 41 is a computational sheet with no reference to dispersion, so we have assumed the correct reference page in the above comment could have been pg 8, which states that flows cannot be dispersed. 4. The existing gravel area must be modeled as 50% impervious, not 100% impervious, per Table 3.2.2E in the 1998 KCSWDM (6,690 rather than 13, 380 square feet). We have revised the KCRTS model to reflect 50% pervious/impervious fraction for the existing gravel parking lot (see TIR pg 33, 38, 39) and the result is still much less than 0.1 cfs difference between existing and developed conditions. Please note that the text on TIR pg 9 has also been revised to reflect the 0.036 cfs difference. Plans 5. Please clarify on the plans how the roof runoff will be controlled and make sure that it does not impair the function of the bioswale. The TIR shows the bioswale in a location that could work with splash blocks or dispersion for the roof runoff. The plans show the bioswale in a location that will intercept runoff from the roof if splash blocks are used. With reference to June 9, 2008 TIR pg 40 and 43, and amended TIR pg 33, the bioswale is sized to accept flows from the proposed roof. We have added a tightline to accomplish this on revised plan sheet C-104). 0 The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment If you have any questions regarding the information enclosed, please let us know. We look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Thomas A:' Nishimura President/Owner cc: Midway Samoan Church AkCITY OF Federal October 20, 2008 Thomas Nishimura The Nishimura Associates, LLC 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South y Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007), 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Nishimura/Ms.Godding: On August 1, 2008, the City received resubmitted plans regarding the proposed new church and associated site improvements. The following technical comments must be addressed prior to any further action on this application. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED Planning, David Lee (253-835-2622, david.lee@cityoffederalway.com) 1. Item #2 - Response on the applicant's resubmittal narrative (resubmitted August 1, 2008) states that elevations were resubmitted. However, no elevation plans were included with the resubmittal package. Only civil plans sheets C-101 through C-104 were resubmitted. Please submit a full set of updated plans including the aforementioned elevation plans. 2. The ESA AdoIfson review (dated June 4, 2007) of the applicant's submitted wetland study (Genesis Resource Consulting) concluded that the wetland in question is a Class II wetland with a 100-foot buffer. The plans submitted on August 1, 2008, now properly show the 100-foot buffer. From the narrative the applicant provided ("Item 3 Response"), it is assumed that the applicant wishes to request a buffer reduction pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1359(e). The director of community development may reduce the standard wetland buffer width by up to 50%, but in no case to less than 25 feet, on a case -by -case basis, if the project includes a buffer enhancement plan that utilizes appropriate native vegetation and clearly substantiates that an enhanced buffer will improve and provide additional protection of wetland functions and values, and where one of the following conditions can be demonstrated: 1. Existing conditions are such that the required standard buffer exists in a permanently altered state (e.g., roadways, paved parking lots, permanent structures, etc.) that does not provide any buffer function, then the buffer can be reduced for that portion where the intrusions are existing. 2. Except for Category I wetlands, existing conditions are such that the wetland has been permanently impacted by adjacent development activities, as evidenced by such things as persistent human alterations -or the dominance of non-native invasive species. M—T. Nibir33llM October 20, 2008 Page 2 The director shall have the authority to determine if buffer averaging is warranted on the subject property and, if so, may require additional buffer area on the other portions of the perimeter of the sensitive area. Therefore, please prepare and submit a formal request for buffer reduction. This request should include an updated assessment of the Category R wetland, a buffer enhancement plan, a narrative explaining how it meets one of the two criteria of FWCC Section 22-1359(e), and a proposal of how much the buffer needs to be reduced. Please also remember that the request must entail ALL intrusions into the wetland and wetland buffer, including stormwater systems and piping. A higher land use process (Land Use Process IV/Hearing Examiner) is needed when intruding into the actual wetland or encroachment into a wetland buffer that has been reduced down to the very minimum. The report must be prepared by a wetland biologist, and will be reviewed by the city's wetland consultant. There is still an outstanding balance of $2,108 owed to the city for the initial peer review (completed by ESA Adolfson) of the wetland study done by Genesis Resource Consulting. Please pay this amount immediately. A copy of the invoice and e-mail have been enclosed with this letter. Please also be aware that additional consultant review fees will be necessary to complete the review of any future resubmitted wetland reports. A cost estimate will be provided shortly after (to the applicant) once the wetland report has been resubmitted. Development Services, Ann Dower (253-835-2732, ann.dower@cityoffederalway.com) Please provide the following revisions: The applicant did not provide an easement as requested for the sanitary sewer connection to the existing manhole. The easement must be in place prior to approval of the engineering plans. 2. The outfall for the storm system is shown on the neighboring property and within the 100-foot stream buffer. In this location, the applicant will need Hearing Examiner approval of the outfall and a recorded easement prior to approval of the engineering plans. The effect on downstream flooding problems will be factored into any decision. TIR 3. The TIR has conflicting information regarding the outfall, stating that it will be dispersed (p. 9) and that it can't be dispersed (p.41). In discussing this threshold with Steve Foley of King County, he pointed out that the 0.5 cfs threshold applies at the property line. Dispersion can be allowed with a 100' vegetated flow path between the dispersion trench and the property line. See figure 4.2.2.0 for design details. At least 100 feet of vegetated flow path (preferably more) is also favored by staff to reduce and/or eliminate any downstream impact. 4. The existing gravel area must be modeled as 50% impervious, not 100% impervious, per Table 3.2.2.E in the 1998 KCSWDM (6,690 rather than 13,380 square feet). Plans 5. Please clarify on the plans how the roof runoff will be controlled and make sure that it does not impair the function of the bioswale. The TIR shows the bioswale in a location that could work with splash blocks or dispersion for the roof runoff. The plans show the bioswale in a location that will intercept runoff from the roof if splashblocks are used. 07-101136 Doc. I.D. 47067 Mr. Nishimura October 20, 2008 Page 3 Project Cancellation - Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-34, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you should have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please feel free to call me at 253-835-2622. I look forward to continuing to work with you on this project. Sincerely, avid ee Associate Planner enc Resubmittal Form c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer 07-101136 Doc I D 47067 i RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APR 0 9 2007 RECEIVEb 6Y \ POMMUNITYDFVELOV14ENTNPARTNIENT } MAY 14 2007 l CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: March 27, 2007 City: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Consultant: ESA Adolfson Attn: Teresa Vanderburg 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206-789-9658 Project: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church 29276 Military Road South Federal Way, WA 98003 File No.: 07-101136-00-UP (Process rV Application for a Church) - Project Proponent: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church c/o Tom Nishimura Nishimura Associates /'973'1 I�tl- W P dX G� attlevut WA. - Project Planner: Andy Bergsagel 253-835-2644(Phone) 253-835-2609 (Fax) Documents Provided: • Set of plans (received March 2, 2007) • Wetland Delineation Report by Genesis Resource Consulting (Winlock), dated March 31, 2006 Task Scope: Genesis claims that the wetland is Category III (50-foot buffer). The City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map shows the wetland as Category II (100-foot buffer). Please determine whether the wetland is Category II or Category III. 1. Review submitted documents for accuracy and conformance with: • FWCC 22-1: Definition of wetland. • FWCC 22-1356: Determination of wetland and regulated wetland. • FWCC 22-1357: Wetland categories and standard buffers. 2. Conduct site visit. 3. Confirm delineation. 4. Provide memorandum identifying additional information to be requested of applicant (if necessary). 5. Possible meetings on site and/or with applicant's wetland biologist. 6. Provide written response as to status of the wetland. Task Schedule: Provide task cost estimate within three days of receipt of this form. Task Cost: Not to exceed S o without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. (Consultant to fill in figure.) Acceptance: City of Federal Wa anner) �i ce✓[J, At, � +-son (Project r7 7 Date File No 07-101136-00-UP Doc I D.40266 From: David Lee To: Sarah Godding Date: 6/12/2008 3:03 PM Subject: Fwd: Samoan Church invoice Attachments: InvoiceSetOct0407.pdf; SCestimate.pdf Sarah, I think we talked about this once upon a long time ago, but there's still an outstanding bill for the work ESM did for the initial review of the wetland study. Only the initial agreed upon estimate (wetland consultant authorization form received May 14, 2007) of $2,180 is due at this time. Please see the attached ESM invoice and the Wetland Consultant Authorization form and turn in a check to the city for the amount of $2,180. Please call me with any questions or clarification. I know its been a little while with this project! Dave David B. Lee Associate Planner City Of Federal Way (0)(253)835-2622 (F) (253)835-2609 david.lee@cibnffederalway.com >>> "Lizzie Zemke" <I.2emke esassoc.com> 6/2/2008 11:50 AM >>> Hi Again, I have attached a PDF of the invoice to this message. Please let me know if you need additional information. Thanks. Lizzie Zemke Senior Scientist ESA Adolfson I Biological Resources 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789-9658 1 206.789-9684 fax item keaa. ad o Ifso n. co m r'" E(SA o o 5309 S Suite 200 Ve 1 VOICE Seattle, WA 98107 (206) 789-9658 Greg Fewins October 4, 2007 City of Federal Way Invoice No: 77920 P.O. Box 9718 33325 8th Avenue South Project Manager. Elizabeth Zemke Federal Way, WA 98063 Project D207004.00 FEDERAL WAY ON CALL 2007 BILLING SUMMARY: Review materials from City; prepare task authorizat ion; conduct site visit; communication with City regarding additional work needed on -site by the applicant. Professional Services from AvrilS. 2007 to August 27, 2007 Task 000041A SAMOAN CHURCH Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Senior Planner/Senior Scientist Zemke, Elizabeth 6/1/07 1.00 108.93 108.93 review letter Zemke, Elizabeth 8J27/07 2.00 108.93 217.86 Zemke, Elizabeth 9/4/07 1.00 108.93 108.93 Zemke, Elizabeth 9/6107 1.00 108.93 108.93 sens summary and cost to City; track down new PM (Greg) Staff Planner/Staff Scientist Logan, lion W3/07 2.50 92.08 230.20 field visit Logan, lion 8/24/07 .50 92.08 46.04 field visit notes Scientist/Projec tAdmin Merrill, Adam 3130/07 2.00 69.84 139.68 SAMOAN CHURCH TAand document review Merrill, Adam 415/07 .50 69.84 34.92 SAMOAN CHURCH-communica tion Merrill, Adam 5/22/07 4.00 69.84 279.36 document review and communication (1.5 hr) + review letter (2.5) Merrill, Adam 5/24/07 4.00 89.84 279.36 site visit (3 yrs) + document review/communica tion (1hr) PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT Project D207004.00 FEDERAL WAY ON CALL 2W7 Merrill, Adam 5/31/07 3.50 letter, and communication Merrill, Adam 6/1/07 .50 letter revisions Merrill, Adam 6/5/07 1.00 communication/fi nal letter revisions Staff Scientist Thoreson, Lara 5/24/07 3.25 field work downloading pics Thoreson, Lara 8(23/07 3.50 field visit Thoreson, Lars 8&27/07 1.50 email, discussion, task authorization, Sr. Project Administrator Bjork, Susan 5/1/07 .25 set up TA Totals 32.00 Total tabor In -House Reimbursable Billing Vehicle per mile Seattle -White Car 57.0 Miles @ 0.485 Seattle White Car 56.0 Miles @ 0.485 Total In -House Reimbursables Outstanding Invoices Number Date Balance 75915 N16/07 2,098.51 Total 2,098.51 Remit to: ESA P.O. Box 92170 Elk Grove, IL 60009 TIN # 94-1698350 69.84 244.44 69.84 34.92 69.84 69.84 57.45 186.71 57.45 201.08 57.45 86.18 80.56 20.14 2,397.52 I nvoice 77920 2,397.52 27.65 27.16 1.0 times 54.81 54.81 Total this Task $2,452.33 TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT: $2,452.33 PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT Page 2 uRECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT The Nishimura Associates O & T 9, 6 2007 A Nehemiah Commitment October 24, 2007 Greg Fewins City of Federal Way Planning Division 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, Washington 98063-9718 RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007), 29276 Military Road South Mr. Greg Fewins, The purpose of this letter is to request a 30 day extension for the CUP re -submittal for Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church. The current deadline is November 7, 2007. The city of Federal Way has requested new information regarding flood plane data and a study that was not asked for in the original letter dated May 11, 2007. Gathering this new information has required more time than anticipated and it is not possible to complete it in the time frame allowed. Dan Price Land Surveying Inc. and Sound Consultant LLC. are making every effort to provide the required information, but they will need more time. Everything else that was requested has been prepared and is ready to submit. We would like to know if we should hold it all until the flood plane data and study is completed or do we turn in what we have and bring in the rest of the information when it is available? Please advise us as soon as possible. Thank you for your prompt attention. Sincer Thomas A. ishimura, President The Nishimura Associates Environmental Planning Landscape Design Project Development & Management 12737 Bel — Red Rd., Suite 220 - (425) 453.4886 • Cellular (206) 310.2820 - Fax (425) 453.4889 3111 South Lehua Street Kahului, Maui, HI96732 • (808) 871.5701 MAIM,- 0TY '0P20*4ft%WftmP OF Federal Way DATE: 10/ 10/08 MEMORANDUM Public Works Department TO: David Lee FROM: Ann Dower SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) - (07-101136-00-UP) 29276 MILITARY RD S; Development Services Review The Development Services Department has reviewed the information provided on August 1, 2008. Please provide the following revisions: 1. The applicant did not provide an easement as requested for the sanitary sewer connection to the existing manhole. The easement must be in place prior to approval of the engineering plans. 2. The outfall for the storm system is shown on the neighboring property and within the 100-foot stream buffer. In this location, the applicant will need Hearing Examiner approval of the outfall and a recorded easement prior to approval of the engineering plans. The effect on downstream flooding problems will be factored into any decision. TIR 3. The TIR has conflicting information regarding the outfall, stating that it will be dispersed (p. 9) and that it can't be dispersed (p.41). In discussing this threshold with Steve Foley of King County, he pointed out that the 0.5 cfs threshold applies at the property line. Dispersion can be allowed with a 100'vegetated flow path between the dispersion trench and the property line. See figure 4.2.2.0 for design details. At least 100 feet of vegetated flow path (preferably more) is also favored by staff to reduce and/or eliminate any downstream impact. 4. The existing gravel area must be modeled as 50% impervious, not 100% impervious, per Table 3.2.2.E in the 1998 KCSWDM (6,690 rather than 13,380 square feet). Plans 5. Please clarify on the plans how the roof runoff will be controlled and make sure that it does not impair the function of the bioswale. The TIR shows the bioswale in a location that could work with splash blocks or dispersion for the roof runoff. The plans show the bioswale in a location that will intercept runoff from the roof if splashblocks are used. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South RESUBMITTED PO Box 9718 CITY OF 4::k�Federal Way WA 98063-9718 FederalWay AUG o 1 Z008 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffedcralway.co ay.com CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. "Pleasenote.- Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. "" Project Number: o - ( 6 1 j :� l0 - --n- D - U 2 a Project Name:l&� 60,0 vt �' Project Address: Project Contact: _ .- s Phone: q 2,g — 433 - q�38 RESUBMITTED ITEMS: # of Copies ** Detailed Description of Item ** Always submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application.** Resubmittal Requested by: (Stan memne Letter Dated: 1 / - - OFFICE USE L Y -- RESUB #.• 2— Distribution By 1 Dept/Div Name # Description Building Plannin PW Fire Other Bulletin #129 — August 8, 2006 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information �I The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment 12737 Bel -Red Rd Suite220, Bellevue, WA 98005 phone 425.453.4886 fax 425.453.4889 www.nishimuraassociates.com July 14, 2008 RE: Response to Midway Samoan AG (File# 07-101136-00-UP) Review Letter. Dear Mr. Lee, Item 1 Response: Midway Samoan AG has no plans at this time to expand, and understands that any future expansion will be subject to prevailing codes and review. Item 2 Response: A canopy has been added to the entrance way. Please refer to the resubmitted elevations. Item 3 Response: The buffer has been revised to 100 feet. As evidenced by pre-1970's aerial photographs (previously submitted) the "buffer"has been continually utilized as a playfield, with a concrete basketball court, old foundation, and campground. During discussions with our wetland and civil engineering consultants, it became obvious that by recharging the groundwater via a percolation trench, and allowing the area to revegetated, the buffer would not be detrimentally impacted by inclusion of a minor storm -water facility buffer intrusion, but would benefit significantly from the additional groundwater and attendant landscaping. The proposed location of the storm system minimizes its size and resultant impact, while providing a viable benefit to the site and re -grown buffer. Because the church proposes to remove the court, foundation, and other accumulated debris from the buffer from the buffer, and then allow a natural and supported revegatation, habitat will be recreated, soil stability enhanced, and a greenbelt/ buffer created. The proposed buffer intrusion is very minor, and can be compensated for by buffer averaging or enhanced landscaping. The church is aware of the increased review standards resulting from our proposal, and feel we can meet or exceed that review criteria. Preliminary Engineering Plans Items 1 through 5 Response: Please refer to the revised, resubmitted plans accompanying this letter Preliminary/ Final TIR Items 1, 2A through C: Please refer to the revised, resubmitted TIR accompanying this letter. Environmental Planning Landscape Design Project Development 8 Management wmnishimuraassociates corn 12737 Bel — Red Rd., Suite 220 • (425) 453.4886 • Cellular (206) 310.2820 • Fax (425) 4534889 311 South Lehua Street Kahului, Maui, HI 96732 • (808) 871.5701 07-101136 RESUBMITTED AUG 4 1 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. w The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment SEPA Checklist: The roof is metal, and the downspouts will be directed into the bioswale. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to your review letter. Should there be any questions, please call Tom Nishimura at 1.877.223.2022 Toll -free. Sincerely,. � Thomas Nishimura, Owner Nishimura Associates LLC 07-olOI136 RESUBMITTED AUG 0 1 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. Environmental Del Planning Landscape Design O Project Development & Management 12737 Bel — Red Rd, Suite 220 • (425) 453.4M • Cellular (206) 310-2820 • Fax (425) 453.4M 311 South Lehua Street Kahului, Maul, HI 95732 • (808) 871.5701 1kCiry of Federal April 3, 2008 The Nishimura Associates, LLC Attn: Sarah Godding/Thomas Nishimura 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South y Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Nishimura/Ms.Godding: On January 22, 2008, the City received resubmitted plans regarding the proposed new church and associated site improvements. The following technical comments must be addressed prior to any further action on this application. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED Planning, David Lee (253-835-2622, david.lee@cityoffederalway.com) 1. Please confirm that there are no plans to add "Phase II" to this application and the site as depicted on the January 22, 2008, site plan is the final site design intended for this project. In the future, if the applicant wishes to make any additions to the proposed structure, the applicant will be subject to any new city codes and review. If it is determined that the improvements included in the January 22, 2008, submittal are within an environmentally sensitive area or buffer, any new additions may be subject to an additional SEPA Checklist review and associated city reviews. If the applicant wishes to re -add the proposed "Phase II", site plans and the SEPA Checklist would need to be modified and corrected. 2. Please submit elevation plans showing the changes made to the entranceway. 3. The ESA Adolfson review (dated June 4, 2007) of the applicant's submitted wetland study (Genesis Resource Consulting) concludes that the wetland in question is indeed a Class II wetland with a 100- foot buffer. The plans submitted on January 22, 2008, still show a buffer of 50 feet (Class III wetland buffer). Please revise your plans to show the 100-foot buffer. Additionally, any intrusion into the wetland buffer will require a more rigorous standard of review through the Hearing Examiner. It may be advisable that your wetland consultant work with ESA Adolfson (Lizzie Zernke/Lara Thoreson) with any questions. If it is determined that improvements can not be located outside of the wetland buffer, the applicant must make the following findings pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1359(f): 1. It will not adversely affect water quality; 2. It will not adversely affect the existing quality of the wetland's or buffer's wildlife habitat; 3. It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities; 4. It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards; and Nishimura/Godding April 3, 2008 Page 2 5. It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the city as a whole, including the loss of open space. Any intrusion into the wetland buffer shall not reduce the standard buffer by more than 50%, and in no case shall the remaining buffer be less than 25 feet. The city may require the preparation and implementation of a wetland buffer enhancement plan to protect wetland and buffer functions and values. PW Development Services, Ann Dower (253-835-2732, ann.dower@cityoffederalway.com) We have reviewed the preliminary analysis and plans for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church date stamped resubmitted January 22, 2008, and found items that need to be addressed prior to receiving preliminary approval from Development Services. These items are in accordance with Chapters 21 and 22 of the Federal Way City Code and the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and are as follows: Preliminary Engineering Plans (CIVIL DRAWINGS): l . Show the location of the nine -foot right-of-way dedication and the 11-foot Tract X (per the right-of- way modification). Show the required setbacks from the back of the Tract X. 2. Show the proposed grading plan more accurately. Several contour lines are missing, and it would appear that there will be approximately five feet of fill in areas. If retaining structures will be required, they must be shown preliminarily at this time. 3. Show the length of the dispersal trench. Coordinate this with the preliminary design in the TIR. 4_ Show the apparent required easement to connect the side sewer service to the sewer manhole off the southeast property comer. 5. Show the location of the ADA required curb ramps to the sidewalk. Preliminary/Final Technical Information Report: l . Use page numbers throughout the report. 2. Preliminary Bioswale Design: a_ Provide a facility design and sketch with the design calculations. b_ Provide a water quality basin map showing the area that will be draining to the proposed bioswale. C. Note that the slope of I % requires underdrams. d. Finish the calculations of steps 3 through 6 (KCSWDM 6.3.1.1). e. Provide a preliminary design for the flow dispersal trench. SEPA Checklist Review: Item B.3.c.1: If the roof surface is metal, it is required to flow through the bioswale, not bypass it. PIease make mention as to the roof composition for the proposed structure. Project Cancellation - Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-34, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. 07-101136 Doc 1 D 44788 Nishimura/Godding April 3, 2008 Page 3 If you should have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please feel free to call me at 253-835-2622. I look forward to continuing to work with you on this project. Sincerely, ;avid Lee Associate Planner enc Resubmittal Form c_ Ann Dower, Engineering Plans Reviewer 07-101136 Doe 1 D 44789 e CITY OF Federal Way DATE: March 20, 2008 MEMORANDUM Public Works Department TO: David Lee FROM: Sean Wells, P. SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) - (07-101136-00-UP) 29276 MILITARY RD S - PWDS Technical Comments #1 We have reviewed the preliminary analysis and plans for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church date stamped resubmitted January 22, 2008, and found items that need to be addressed prior to receiving preliminary approval from Development Services. These items are in accordance with Chapters 21 and 22 of the Federal Way City Code and the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and are as follows: Prelimina Engineering Plans CIVIL DRAWINGS : 1. Show the location of the 9 foot right of way dedication and the 11 foot Tract X (per the right-of-way modification). Show the required setbacks from the back of the Tract X. 2. Show the proposed grading plan more accurately. Several contour lines are missing, and it would appear that there will be approximately 5 feet of fill in areas. If retaining structures will be required, they must be shown preliminarily at this time. 3. Show the length of the dispersal trench. Coordinate this with the preliminary design in the TIR. 4. Show the apparent required easement to connect the side sewer service to the sewer manhole off the south east property corner. 5. Show the location of the ADA required curb ramps to the sidewalk. Prelim inaFinal Technical Information Report: 1. Use page numbers throughout the report. 2. Preliminary Bioswale Design: a. Provide a facility design and sketch with the design calculations. b. Provide a water quality basin map showing the area that will be draining to the proposed bioswale. c. Note that the slope of 1% requires underdrains. d. Finish the calculations of steps 3 through 6 (KCSWDM 6.3.1.1) e. Provide a preliminary design for the flow dispersal trench. CITY OF Federal Way DATE: March 20, 2008 TO: David Lee MEMORANDUM Public Works Department FROM: Sean Wells, P. . SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) - (07-101137-00-SE) 29276 MILITARY RD S PWDS SEPA Checklist Comments #2 I have reviewed the SEPA checklist resubmitted for this project dated January 22, 2008, and have the following comments: 1. Item B.3.c.1: If the roof surface is metal, it is required to flow through the bioswale, not bypass it. Please make mention as to the roof composition for the proposed structure. u The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment 12737 Bel -Red Rd Suite220, Bellevue, WA 98005 phone 425.453.4886 fax 425.453.4889 www.nishimuraassociates.com January 16, 2008 City of Federal Way Planning Division 33325 8s' Avenue South Federal Way, Washington 98063-9718 RE: File #07-1011366-00-UP Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church, 29276 Military Road South Dear David Lee, This letter is in response to the May 11, 2007 letter from the City of Federal Way regarding the CUP application for Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church. PLANNING DIVISION: 1. It is understood that the BLA is a condition of approval prior to issuance of construction permits. 2. A letter of authorization for a wetland consultant was signed and returned to the City of Federal Way. 3. The number of parking spaces has been corrected to 33 and the count and ratio has been noted on the site plan (1 space per 72 square feet). 4. The driving aisle is corrected to 25'. 5. Potential overflow parking is deleted from the plans. 6. Phasing: At this time the church intends to complete only the building in Phase I of the project. 7.6 copies of a revised SEPA checklist are included. 8. Location of the trash/recycling enclosure is indicated on the site plan with a detail of the construction. 9. LANDSCAPE PLAN: a revised plan is included showing the following: a. Overflow parking is deleted. b. A 20-foot-wide Type III landscaping strip is indicated along ROW. c. A 10-foot-wide Type III landscaping strip along the north and south property lines is indicated. d. The landscaping over what was Phase II will be lawn and building footing plantings. e. Landscaping will be provided along the north facade of the building. 10. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES: a. Location of entrances are indicated on the plans and a 6' wide pedestrian pathway from the street to the main entrance is indicated. ®7®IID1136 Environmental Planning Landscape Design Project Development & Management _i 2008 --nishimuraassoriates.com 12737 Bel — Red Rd., Suite 220 • (425) 453-4888 • Cellular (206) 310.2320 • Fax (425) 40 4886 311 South Lehua Street Kahului, Maui, HI 96732 • (808) 87t.5701 Ci BUILDING NGDEPT. WAY 3 The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment b. Pertaining to building articulation a covered entranceway has been added to the front of the building. c. 4 light fixtures have been placed on the property with a detailed diagram and description included on the plans. d. A color board is included. PUBLIC WORKS — DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION: The Right of Way issue has been addresses with a 9' dedication and I F tract x set aside. PUBLIC WORKS — TRAFFIC DIVISION: 1. The driveway throat is 75'. 2. The request for parking space for the "school" is not applicable as there is no school on the property. 3. Typical vehicle occupancy for this church is 4 people. FIRE MARSHALL'S OFFICE: 1. A certificate for water availability is enclosed BUILDING OFFICIALS OFFICE: 1. The building occupancy is corrected to 100. CLOSING: As requested please find enclosed 3 copies of this response letter, 6 copies of site and landscape plans, 4 copies site and landscape plans l lx17, 6 copies of revised SEPA checklist, 2 copies of the engineering report from Sound Consultants, and 1 copy of the re -submittal form. Sincerely, r 'v ThomasA. Nishimura The Nishimura Associates Environmental Planning Landscape Design' Project Development & Management 12737 Bel — Red Rd, Suite 220 • (425) 453.48M • Cellular (206) 310.2820 • Fax (425) 4534U9 311 South Lehus Street Kahului, Maui, En 96732 • (808) 871.5701 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8TH Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-83'5-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 wynW.Gityoffederalway.com ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLI$T PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW Chapter 43.21C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts ;from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the hest of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. if you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the (,governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit thi!3 checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions May be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Action's (part D). For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. !?ESU MI p Ell .BAN 2 2 2008 CiTY OFDFEDERAL WAY A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Midway Samoan Assembly of God 2. Name of applicant: Midway Samoan Assembly of God 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 29276 S Military Road Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 815-9817 4. Date checklist prepared: October 24, 2007 5. Agency requesting checklist: Contact: The Nishimura Associates 12 73 7 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 (425) 453-4886 City of Federal Way Planning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The applicant would like to begin construction as soon as permitted. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A preliminary Wetland Report and Delineation was prepared by Genesis Resource Consulting and subsequently a report has been prepared by Adolfsen at the request of the City of Federal Way. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 1. Process IVApproval 2. Demolition Permit 3. Side Sewer Permit 4. Boundary Line Adjustment 5. Voluntary Correction Agreement 6 Electrical Permit 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The Midway Samoan Assembly of God church proposes to install an approximately 40' x 60' (2,400 sf.) pre fabricated steel building to be used for assembly and worship, along with attendant site improvements. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic reap, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 29276 S Military Road Federal Way, WA 98003 County Parcel No.'s 042104-9063 and 042104-9032 Legal Description: 010 S 220 FT LYN OF & ADJ S 11 AC OF POR SW4 LY W 020 OF ELYARM OFDRAINAGE DIST LESS POR W OF ELYMGS 030 MILITARYRD 1.79 AC (FUTURE CHURCH SITE) Section, Township, Range: NE 4 214 The site is located south of the intersection of 288`" and .,V litar�, Road B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 3 C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. From Military Road to approximately the wetland, the soil is Alderwood, Gravely Sandy Loam as mapped by the USGS maps of King County, WA 1980. The wetlands as mapped in the USGS soil survey [1980, King County, WAJ is Orcas hydric soil d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximate 500-750 cubic yards of soil will be graded for builrlln', foundation, parking lot, and utilities construction. Cut and fill will be balanced on site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Every attempt possible will be made to minimize erosion during installation .process. The completed proposed project should not cause any erosion to occur. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The steel building is 40' x 60 ; a total of approximately 2,400 square feet. Parking and sidewalk total approximately 15,670 square feet, for a site total of approximately 18,070 square feet of impervious surface. 14.5% of the site will be covered at the end of this construction project h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Measures outlined in the Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) will minimize erosion during construction and contain sedimentation on site. Landscaping and cover measure specified in the plans for the project will prevent erosion upon project completion. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some exhaust and dust emissions will occur during the construction process. The TESCP for the proposed projects calls for minimization of dust emissions. Minor vehicle emissions and exhaust from natural gas heating will occur upon completion of proposed project. These are minimal in comparison with the emissions already present from close proximity to Military Road South. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The project is located next to a major arterial (Mlitary Road South) and vehicle emissions are the only known source of off -site air pollution. It is not anticipated that this will affect the proposab c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. TESCP 3. WATER a. Surface 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a scrub -shrub wetland present on the Eastern portion of the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The sewer connection may need to cross a portion of the wetland buffer to connect to the existing sewer main located to the East of the wetland If wetland area is disturbed, a separate gradinglfiffing permit will be needed from the US Army Corps of Engineers. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes, please refer to accompany engineering report. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None C. Water Runoff(including stormwater 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will the water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm runoff will be limited to site runoff only (there is no off -site contributory runoff. Storm runoff will be collected from the asphalt paving and landscaped areas into a conveyance pipe, then through a bio-filtration swale and discharging to it's natural point of discharge through a dispersal trench. Roof runoff will discharge to the same location, bypassing the bio filtration Swale. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. A City approved Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be implemented prior to construction 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. _X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture (lawn) _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plant: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grassed areas will be removed for site and building improvements. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. All landscaping will conform to the City of Federal Way requirements, as outlined in Section 27.1564, Federal Way City Code. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None proposed 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and Natural Gas will be used and provided by Puget Sound Energy. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The building will be in compliance with current Washington State Energy code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 91.1 services may be required in case of emergency situations. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. None proposed b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area that may affect your proposal (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Existing noise in the area of the proposed project results mostly from traffic on Military Road South. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The proposed project will create short-term noise associated with construction equipment. The construction noise will be limited to those hours of operation allowed by the City of Federal Way. The proposed project will create a minor amount of long- term traffic noise, which will mostly occur during Sunday Church Services. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Due to the location of the proposed project, short-term construction noise is not anticipated to have negative impact on neighboring properties. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The project site is mostly undeveloped The adjacent properties are residential and vacant. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No C. Describe any structures on the site. There is a 32' x 60' structure located at the eastern portion of Parcel A and a 20' x 25' residence located at the southeastern portion of Parcel B. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Both existing structures will be demolished e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RM-3600 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current plan is multi family g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. There is a scrub -shrub wetland located on the eastern portion of the site. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? There will be no residents. Total number of people working at the completed project will be approximately 1-2. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. None proposed 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposed project is permitted upon approval of a Process IV permit. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The steel building will not exceed 18' in height. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The proposed building will be seen from Military Road South. No views will be obstructed C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The proposed project will be in compliance with City of Federal Way regulations as outlined in the City Code. .-N, 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Outdoor building illumination is required and will not exceed the set standards. No offsite impacts are expected Cut off fixtures will be used to minimize offsite glare. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Outdoor building illumination will be kept to a minimum with the use of cut off fixtures. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are three parks located near the project. Sacagawea Park, Wildwood Park and Camelot Park. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. None proposed 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None proposed 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by Military Road South. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The proposed site will provide 33 parking spaces. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Military Road is going to be widened and will require a 9 foot right of way dedication. In addition an 11' tract X has been set aside. A traffic report, prepared by Transportation Planning and Engineering, Inc. is included with this submittal with a follow-up report by Whipple Consulting Engineers. A letter requesting deferment of required road construction to a more appropriate future date has also been submitted and approved e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/A f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. A preliminary Traffic Report has been updated by Whipple Consulting Engineers and a copy is included g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Noneproposed 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. A minimal increase in fire and police protection may occur in the event of afire or crime. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed at this time. 16. UTILITES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity that might be needed. Gas and electric provided by Puget Sound Energy. Sewer provided by Lakehaven. Telephone service provided by US West. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. SIGNATURE: DATE SUBMITTED: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 6, 2008 Te TO: Sean Wells, Development Services Soma Chattopadhyay, PW Traffic Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Chris Ingham, South King County Fire & Rescue FROM: David Lee FILE NUMBER(s): 07-101136-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) PROJECT ADDRESS: 29276 MILITARY RD S ZONING DISTRICT: RM 3600 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a new church to replace the existing facilities. All existing buildings to be demolished. Phase I: Build a 40 x 60 pre-engineered steel building as a multiple purpose sanctuary with 31 (33?) parking stalls and landscaping. Phase II: Add class LAND USE PERMITS: Preliminary Plat, SEPA PROJECT CONTACT: THE NISHIMURA ASSOCIATES, LLC THOMAS NISHIMURA 12737 Bel -Red Road Suite 220 4254534886 (Work) MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat conceptual drawing DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ESQ BM 33325 81" Avenue South RESUBMITTED PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Way JAN 2 2 2008 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 ivww.c i tyof Federal w a. CITY GE FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. 'Please note: Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. ** Project Number: 0 1 - 1 0 - tA P Project Name: �AIAWA!� 5afkOAVA Project Address: Project Contact-�Im, �tsyul►m-Lya Phone: 426 •1453• 1,106l RESUBMITTED ITEMS: # of Copies Detailed Description of Item /a 1. .� ** Always submit the same number of copies as required toryourrnitlal application.-- Resubmittal Requested by: o� L� Letter Dated: 06 //I/O� to a er OFFICE USE ONL Y RESUB #.• Distribution Date: s D Br Dept/Div N # Description )3uildin Plannin ,J PW Fire Other Bulletin #129 — August 8, 2006 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES tr RESUBMITTED 33325 8`s Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF MAY 1 3 2009 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY www.cityoffederalway.com BUILDING DEPT. RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUST accompany all resubmittals. **Please note: Additional or revised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Mailed resubmittals that do not include this form or that do not contain the correct number of copies will be returned or discarded. You are encouraged to submit all items in person and to contact the Customer Service Counter prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. ** Project Number: Project Name: Project Address: F"T T Project Contact: � i 0`- v Phone: 415,453 qn(o Zo(p, 3A(D, Z�),D RESUBMITTED ITEMS: LkA # of Copies "* Detailed Description of Item 1-n 6 a;,n S shuv,31r&ff:� -t n[C ** Always submit the same number of copies as required for your initial application. Resubmittal Requested by: 1)8� I l� U-L, Letter Dated: (btatr memner) Imc; OFFICE USE OVL Y RESUB A- Distribution Date: �7 " [ 3 ` a 5 Dept/Div Name # Description Buildin Planning PW Fire Other Bulletin #129 — August 8, 2006 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Wd ington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2009. Project Name MI File Number(s) ;no SeowvAn A SSe�)Mu� 0-f 60C1 CkUrC% 10 Signature `�1, t: I - Date �� G lO. + K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc/Last printed 11/4/2009 10:53:02 AM Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8'h Avenue Federal Way 320'h Branch Library- 848 South 320th Street Subject Site - 29276 Military Road South K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Siles.doc/Last printed 11 /4/2009 10:53:02 AM L6619'Ctl '30Q 9ETTOT-LO -600Z `b .iagwanoN uo J0.1.11H dvM Imapaj aqj ut pagsilgnd ZZgZ-S£8-£SZ Ie zauueld a;etoossV aarl pineQ o; pa;oazip aq pinogs log Cozd siq; 5utpze�az suopsana •guueaq au; azolaq �laam auo mQuoi zoj algtltent aq Ui m zaun xg 5urreaH aq; o;;zodD-IMUIs aqZ '£9086 ` Ak `-/"etkk IVzaPa3 `81L6 xog Od VnoS anu3nV.8 SZ£££ `11eH 43 ;t? za;unoo ;ituzad oq;;e sznoq ssautsnq 2uunp matnaz zoj algeltenu st;oaCozd anogt, ail; zoj alp ptopio aqZ •kt'tkk TezapaA to f4t0 ail; jo satotlod pue `suopupii?oz `sapoo algeotldde iin zopun pomatnaz oq of st uotleoTldde oT.0 moistoop s,zouTurexg WuueaH oql Ieaddr Sum zauiurexg OuueaH ail; of sluounuoo Tejo zo uo:4" iTuigns oqm suoszod XluO -uoistoap s,zaunuexg RuueoH oql jo Xdoo v;sonbaz o;;g2u ail; seq uoszad KuV •&uueaq ail; jo asolo ail; za;le sXrp .�JutAzom ua; uTLUlm uopeotldde AI ssaoozd asn ail; uo uopepuouzuiooaz u ansst Illm zautuxexg 2uueaH aqZ anpe;uasazdaz q2nozq; zo `uoszad uT �iuouipsa; otjgnd 2ui;uasazd pue.Wuueaq aq;;te �uTzeadde ,iq zo `�uueaq ail; azojaq saotnzaS ;uauzdolanaQ �;tunuituoD jo ;uauzlnc ail; o; s;uounuoo 5uuanilop Sq zaq;ta zaututexg 2uueaH ail; o; s;uaunuoo ua;}unn Butgjmgns Sq -guueaq ollgnd aq; ut a;-ediopzed Sum uoszad SuV : ssaoodd 2uuvaH ol1 qnd 600Z `t,zaquuanoM : uopvollddVf0 9311oH LOOZ `6Z gozeW : a1aldu 03 paulzu-1010Q LOOZ `Z TlozeW : partlaoag u011nolPddV dI1-00-9£I 101-LO :ON a119 q;noS PPOU fuull W 9LZ6Z `uoznuD POD JO flIgwassV ueoureS L�empIW :-lau'KO 50086 VAk `annallag `OZZ a;mS `ReOld Pa HOE[ L£LZI soleloossV •eznuzigsjM aqZ :;uuotlddV £Z086 V kk `,�VBc1 IezapQJ `TgnoS peoZl -SMIIIW 9LZ6Z : uoYnao71oaf04d •s;uauianozdwt a;is pa;ietoosse Tjjpv 3uiplmq Iaa;s pazaaui2w -azd ,09x,0t, mou t, Trim SlIpotj Tlomgo 5ut}stxa ue ooeldaz of sosodozd;uvoTldt, o%L : uo.zjCUosaQ gozngD POD to L-IquiassV ueoumS SUMPIW : auInH loafOdd •apoO �tm ILIzapaJ gllm aouepz000n ut `;oo fond 2umolloj oTI; zoJ (£9086 dtkk `,f%-T!AA i'ezapQ3 `8IL6 xog Od `TPnoS anuand ,p8 SZ£££) �eqD Itouno� 3 grAk pmpa j uT 1600Z `SZ .iagwanoN uo `a9;;9a laq; Sllaogs .10 `-tu•d OO:Z;t, 2utzeQq atlgnd i; Ploit U m zaunupxg su!juoH kuM pzapQajo S410 ailj Imp uantii,�gazaq si aouoN ONIIdVJH alrISlld AO :IaIZON Aem lejapa-4 4011kk� CITY Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 841 Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, V hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was Mmailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 0 � 1 -- —, 2009. Project Name l 1' File Number(s) b-7 -Ib )/ 16_ Signature Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribufion.doc/Last printed 1 /5/2009 3:44U0 PM NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at 2:00 pmL, or shortly thereafter, on November 25, 2009, in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33325 81h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063) for the following project, in accordance with Federal Way Code. Project Name: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Description: The applicant proposes to replace an existing church facility with a new 40'x60' pre- engineered steel building with associated site improvements. Project Location: 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA 98023 Applicant: The Nishimura Associates, 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220, Bellevue, WA 98005 Owner: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church, 29276 Military Road South File No: 07-101136-00-UP Application Received: March 2, 2007 Determined Complete: March 29, 2007 Notice of Application: November 4, 2009 Public Hearing Process: Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing, or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hearing Examiner will issue a recommendation on the Use Process IV application within ten working days after the close of the hearing. Any person has the right to request a copy of the Hearing Examiner's decision. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. The application is to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file for the above project is available for review during business hours at the permit counter at City Hall, 33325 81h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063. The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Questions regarding this project should be directed to David Lee, Associate Planner, at 253-835-2622. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 4, 2009. 07-101136 Doc. I.D. 51997 _a (0 00 V U) D W cr 2 o m :t7 v C) v v 3 m 3 m' CD rn (D v W v 0Co CD �Q (D n) (D x (Dv o Q 0 0 v 77 CD(D_ cn _ 0 0r �, r r r 0 .0 n C) "n w 0 v m 0 cn c v (D c� N cn 3 m v 0 n zr CD I n C, c - 5 CD 0 w 3 0 v 0 D cn cn 3 0 G) 0 n T1w TnN Taw TIlV (nj (nTj W CD CD CDCaro 'rIW Z7N Q O (D w (D (0 w C W (D o N V (D O (D (o (D (o D (D -� (D w CO CDcncn 3 N 3 N Q a 7 Ul Q o Q� Q N Q cn fll o p 7 � IIj4�L CD CD N (D V 5 cn tU (D -U (D -u a) Cn Cn 2) cn N N o) (D �awo (D CA) *w *a) <� ? �N<�a) v D DQ w DQ m- �- D co �N D pip W Cl) w o o (o w v) (o (o � 0 0 o w0 � � w OD OD Q- w wo 0 0 C) o 0 0 C`' w w w w 1 1 c- t' A -N A A C) 0 C) a N A A A -N A A A A A t"D < �(o o (o p (DW pZ 0A C)NN pc Cn 00 O-n :::a0 (;) N (P A IQA (T) N N 3 C— zm o 0 0 0 6rr �v o to V C) C)A coo 0 000 CD oom ql am o Amy D V Awfti NE 04-21-04 I COUNTY _ '- - _ .. _. ,. _. _ �__ ..�. reOV .+[•„i �ARTMENf or ASSESSMENTS •'. •,-••.: ._ - »- w.aa r:L�. a Y• .�,• • L .� F ��. '�` - '_. - -._ - . .:�._--~'�.•�' — - ---r=' .- •-• —� � �.- _ ryes,, _— V , .......___._._......, Y...� 3C - S •-- f' ;ACE ; T L l Yk arroF Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church Zoning and Vicinity Map Federal Way 29276 MilitaryRoad S. Process IV File #07-101136-00-UPSEPA File No. 07-101137-00-SE roperty Legend: S4I'' King County Properties Federal V1•ay Zoning Boundary Landmarks Wetlands (1998 City Survey) Multi -Family Properties City of Federal V/ay SVVM Properties School Properties City. County and Stale Park Properties Tracts/Pnvale Open Space Crry of Federal Way Properties ource: City of Federal Way. Lakehaven Utility District, King County Zoning Designations: ON Neighborhood Business RM2400 1 uniN2,400 Sq. Feet RM3600 1 uniU3.600 Sq Feet RS5.0 1 uniN5,000 Sq. Feet RS7.2 1 unitt17,200 Sq. Feet RS9.6 1 unit19,600 Sq. Feet Governed by Development Agreement 'Wetland Source: 1998 City survey Boundaries We appsoximate and addllional areas may exist This is NOT a substitute for a field survey. Scale: N 0 100 200 Feet W This map is accompanied by no warranties. and is simply a graphic representation E' SA 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 (206) 789-9658 Greg Fewins City of Federal Way P.O. Box 9718 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98063 INVOICE October 4, 2007 Invoice No: 77920 Project Manager: Elizabeth Zemke Project D207004.00 FEDERAL WAY ON CALL 2007 BILLING SUMMARY: Review materials from City; prepare task authorization; conduct site visit; communication with City regarding additional work needed on -site by the applicant. Professional Services from April9. 2007 to April 10, 2007 Task 000041A SAMOAN CHURCH Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Senior Planner/Senior Scientist Zemke, Elizabeth 6/1/07 1.00 108.93 108.93 review letter Zemke, Elizabeth 8/27/07 2.00 108.93 217.86 Zemke, Elizabeth 9/4/07 1.00 108.93 108.93 Zemke, Elizabeth 9/6/07 1.00 108.93 108.93 sent summary and cost to City; track down new PM (Greg) Staff Planner/Staff Scientist Logan, Ilon 8/23/07 2.50 92.08 230.20 field visit Logan, Ilon 8/24/07 .50 92.08 46.04 field visit notes Scientist/Project Admin Merrill, Adam 3/30/07 2.00 69.84 139.68 SAMOAN CHURCH TA and document review Merrill, Adam 4/5/07 .50 69.84 34.92 SAMOAN CHURCH -communication Merrill, Adam 5/22/07 4.00 69.84 279.36 document review and communication (1.5 hr) + review letter (2.5) Merrill, Adam 5/24/07 4.00 69.84 279.36 site visit (3 yrs) + document review/communication (1 hr) PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT Project D207004.00 FEDERAL WAY ON CALL 2007 Invoice 77920 Merrill, Adam 5/31/07 3.50 69.84 244.44 letter, and communication Merrill, Adam 6/1/07 .50 69.84 34.92 letter revisions Merrill, Adam 6/5/07 1.00 69.84 69.84 communication/final letter revisions Staff Scientist Thoreson, Lara 5/24/07 3.25 57.45 186.71 field work downloading pics Thoreson, Lara 8/23/07 3.50 57.45 201.08 field visit Thoreson, Lara 8/27/07 1.50 57.45 86.18 email, discussion, task authorization, Sr. Project Administrator Bjork, Susan 5/1/07 .25 80.56 20.14 set up TA Totals 32.00 2,397.52 Total Labor 2,397.52 In -House Reimbursable Billing Vehicle per mile Seattle -White Car 57.0 Miles @ 0.485 27.65 Seattle White Car 56.0 Miles @ 0.485 27.16 Total In -House Reimbursables 1.0 times 54.81 54.81 Total this Task $2,452.33 TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT: $2,452.33 Outstanding Invoices Number Date Balance 75915 4/16/07 2,098.51 Total 2,098.51 Remit to: ESA P.O. Box 92170 Elk Grove, IL 60009 TIN #: 94-1698350 PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT Page 2 ^~� REC D BY COMMUNITYDEVEL�- Iv] ENT DEPARTMENT APR 0 9 Z007 RECEfVED BY CITY OF 0l4IJUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Federal Way MAY 14 2007 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: March 27, 2007 City: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Consultant: ESA Adolfson Attn: Teresa Vanderburg 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206-789-9658 Project: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church 29276 Military Road South Federal Way, WA 98003 File No.: 07-101136-00-UP (Process IV Application for a Church) Project Proponent: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church c/o Tom Nishimura Nishimura Associates 471 f3G 6UC}e, vb &Ilnuc Wk &IN06 Project Planner: Andy Bergsagel 253-835-2644 (Phone) 253-835-2609 (Fax) Documents Provided: • Set of plans (received March 2, 2007) • Wetland Delineation Report by Genesis Resource Consulting (Winlock), dated March 31, 2006 1 Task Scope: Genesis claims that the wetland is Category III (50-foot buffer). The City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map shows the wetland as Category II (100-foot buffer). Please determine whether the wetland is Category II or Category III. 1. Review submitted documents for accuracy and conformance with: ■ FWCC 22-1: Definition of wetland. • FWCC 22-1356: Determination of wetland and regulated wetland. ■ FWCC 22-1357: Wetland categories and standard buffers. 2. Conduct site visit. 3. Confirm delineation. 4. Provide memorandum identifying additional information to be requested of applicant (if necessary). 5. Possible meetings on site and/or with applicant's wetland biologist. 6. Provide written response as to status of the wetland. Task Schedule: Provide task cost estimate within three days of receipt of this form. Task Cost: Not to exceed S a E() without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. (Consultant to till in figure.) Acceptance: IL)' 20 City of Federal Wa Pianner) Date cc �V-051 3 bo/O (Co ul ) o� �� 14do i oY-) Da (Project Propone t) Date File Na 01-101136-00-UP Doc 1 D 40266 {� ESA.Adolfson June 5, 2007 Mr. Andy Bergsagel City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 phone 206.789.9684 fax www.adolfson.com COMMUNITYRECEIVED DE EL PME $DEPARTMENT JUN 12 2007 Subject: Wetland Boundary and Classification Review, Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (File #07-101136-00-UP), Federal Way, Washington Dear Andy: ESA Adolfson (Adolfson) is pleased to present our review of the application materials submitted to the City of Federal Way (City) for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church. The 1.99-acre site is located at 29276 Military Road South in the City of Federal Way, Washington. An existing church and single-family dwelling is located in the western portion of the property. The remainder of the property is undeveloped, and consists of a grass field with scattered trees. The church is proposing to remove the existing buildings and construct a new church on the site. Review comments included in this letter are based on regulatory requirements presented in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22-Critical Areas Regulations, a review of materials provided by the applicant, and a site visit conducted in May 2007. The scope of this review is limited to an evaluation of the delineated wetland boundary and wetland classification. Review of Documents For this sensitive area review, Adolfson evaluated the following materials received from the City on March 29, 2007: • Midway Samoan Church Wetland Delineation Report (Genesis Resource Consulting [GRC], March 31, 2006); and • Survey drawings (Dan Price Land Surveying, November 27, 2005). The wetland delineation report identifies one wetland in the eastern third of the property, which extends offsite to the north, east, and south. The report states that the wetland meets Category III wetland criteria. The survey drawings show the existing structures on the project site, the proposed building, an offsite stream, and the location of the wetland. City policy requires that the wetland boundary be professional surveyed; however, the boundary appears to have been hand -sketched on the survey drawing sheets. ESA Samoan Church wetland review June 5, 2007 Page 2 of 3 Site Visit Adolfson scientist Lara Thoreson and I conducted a site visit on May 24, 2007 to verify the boundary and classification of the onsite wetland. The majority of the site consists of mowed grasses, with a few scattered ornamental trees. Two existing buildings and a parking lot are located on the western portion of the site. Adolfson verified the approximate location of the wetland delineated by GRC. The onsite portion of the wetland is dominated by reed canarygrass, creeping buttercup, and soft rush. Offsite to the north, the wetland is dominated by willows, and areas of ponded water were observed during the site visit. The wetland is contiguous with a stream, which is located east of the project site. None of the wetland boundary flags placed by GRC were observed at the site; it appears that the flags were removed or mowed over. Due to the absence of boundary flags, Adolfson was unable to verify the wetland boundary. Near the northern property boundary, extending west to east, Adolfson observed a linear swale area that appears to meet wetland criteria. The soil within the swale is a black (10YR 2/1) loam, which is considered hydric. The swale area contains a hydrophytic vegetation community, dominated by Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass, and creeping buttercup. Soils within the area were moist, but not saturated. However, it is likely that soils within the swale may be saturated at or near the surface in the early spring. Regulatory Considerations The wetland delineation report states that the onsite wetland meets the criteria for Category III. However, FWCC 22-1357 states that Category II wetlands "are contiguous with water bodies or tributaries to water bodies which under normal circumstances contain or support a fish population." The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has identified the stream to the east of the wetland as coho salmon and cutthroat trout habitat. Therefore, the onsite wetland should be considered Category II, which receives a standard buffer width of 100 feet under the FWCC (22-1357). Recommendations ■ In order to verify the wetland boundary, the delineation flags should be replaced. Given that the wetland boundary area appears to be regularly mowed, the boundary should be verified shortly after the flags are replaced. We recommend that the applicant's wetland consultant schedule an appointment for the wetland verification. In addition, the wetland flags should remain in place until the City makes a decision regarding the wetland classification and wetland buffer width. SSA Samoan Church wetland review June 5, 2007 Page 3 of 3 • The wetland boundary should be professionally surveyed, as required by City policy. • The swale area near the northern property boundary should be re-examined for wetland characteristics. • In accordance with FWCC 22-1357, the onsite wetland should be described in all application project documents as a Category II wetland. Category II wetlands receive a standard buffer width of 100 feet. • Any proposed impacts to the wetland or wetland buffer should be mitigated per FWCC 22- 1358/1359. Limitations Within the limitations of schedule, budget, and scope -of -work, we warrant that this review was conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental science practices, including the technical guidelines and criteria in effect at the time this study was performed. The results and conclusions of this report represent the authors' best professional judgment, based upon information provided by the project proponent in addition to that obtained during the course of this review. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this material for you. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 206-789-9658. Sincerely, ES A OLFSON Ada erriIl Project Scientist cc: Lizzie Zemke, Project Manager REC. ED BY COMMUNITYDEVELuPMENT DEPARTMENT • r APR 0 9 2007 RECEIVED BY CITY OF OMMUN[TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Federal Way MAY 14 2007 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: March 27, 2007 City: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Consultant: ESA Adolfson Attn: Teresa Vanderburg 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206-789-9658 Project: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church 29276 Military Road. South Federal Way, WA 98003 File No.: 07-101136-00-UP (Process IV Application for a Church) Project Proponent: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church c/o Tom Nishimura Nishimura Associates p J(A �2b gtlltvut 1�14• ��o0b Project Planner: Andy Bergsagel 253-835-2644 (Phone) 253-835-2609 (Fax) Documents Provided: • Set of plans (received March 2, 2007) • Wetland Delineation Report by Genesis Resource Consulting (Winlock), dated March 31, 2006 Task Scope: Genesis claims that the wetland is Category III (50-foot buffer). The City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map shows the wetland as Category II (100-foot buffer). Please determine whether the wetland is Category II or Category III. 1. Review submitted documents for accuracy and conformance with: • FWCC 22-1: Definition of wetland. • FWCC 22-1356: Determination of wetland and regulated wetland. • FWCC 22-1357: Wetland categories and standard buffers. 2. Conduct site visit. 3. Confirm delineation. 4. Provide memorandum identifying additional information to be requested of applicant (if necessary). 5. Possible meetings on site and/or with applicant's wetland biologist. 6. Provide written response as to status of the wetland. Task Schedule: Provide task cost estimate within three days of receipt of this form. Task Cost: Not to exceed $300 without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. (Consultant to fill in figure.) Acceptance: .- . _�i io/ 2-Do 7 City of Federal Wa: Planner) D Date 3 3o D {Co ult } a 1 pY-) Da (ProjectPropone Date File No- 07-101136-00-UP Doc. I. D. 40266 Web date: 04/26/2007 KIn C:aulrty ] ' �111ATEh AVAILABILITY: Department of Development and Bo a �l KING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF � D" Building services Division ��� WATER AVAILABi!_ITY 900 Dakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98.057-5212 JAN 2 2 2008 — _ ERU_�__ 206-296-Beat, TTY 20&296.7247 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. This certificate provides thEl Ptifb r rig County Department and the Department of Development and Environme I F rmation necessary to evaluate development proposals: Do not write in this box ------ I Number r A Name Building Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone or other: Applicant's name: Proposed use: Location (attach map and legal description if necessary): �� d i-►4-ry j �� - # 1 a• Watei can beovided by service connection only to an existingt� feet from AA OR the site. _ (size) water main that is ❑ b. Water service will re lr& an improvement to the water system of. feet Of main to reach site; and/or ❑ (2) The construction of a distribution systemter on he site; andlobe ❑ (3) Other (describe): 2• a• OR The water system is in conformance with a Countyapproved water comprehensive plan. ❑ b. The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will r require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance 3 W� a. The proposed is project of a permit or approval,) within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Bounds for extension of Service. outside the district or city, or is within the County approved purveyor. Boundary Review Board approval OR service area of a private water � ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to 4_ � a. Water is or will be available at the rate of flow a d duration indicated below atno'less thade n 20 psi measured at th eet from the indicated e nearest fire hydrant �thano hate building/property Of flow at Peak Demand. ❑ (or as marked on the attached map}: m (approx. gpm) ❑500 to 999 Duration. El now test of _ gpm gpm ❑ 1000 gpm or more ❑ less Phan 1 hour ❑ t hour to 2 hours calculation of �jd p (Mote: Commercial building X2 hours or more mother: `�--� pro OR 9 permits which include mulUfamily structures require now lest or_ Elb. Water system is not capable of providing fire flow.calculatl 5• DZ a• OR Water system has certificates of water rights or water right claims sufficient to provide service- .� ❑ b. Water system does not currently have necessary wat r rights or water righ laim . Comments/conditions: C �Xt rNG S�� `. {1+LF , gf1A ' I certif; o -CG A- W It L-1 ael=-D L'V dLNCr Gl�i 7c- � - - -c-1 Purveyor mtormation is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of �sjqnature, LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT Agency name �¢} rJ Signatory name Title Signature te In Pressure Zone; Highest LowesElevation of Property t f s i fl L O Min. -- — - - — — -- ----- __. ;Est. Max. Pressure —_ g psi The District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay or deny water ser vice based upon capacity Iimitafiions in District and Other Purveyor facilities. Nater availability form Rev. 05-19-2003 ' �� CITY OF L Federal Way May 21, 2007 Mr. Hal Hagenson, P.E. Sound Consultants, LLC 6484 48th Ave SW Seattle, WA 98136 �l CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com RE.- Permit No. 0 71 0I475-0D-SM; MIDWA Y SAMOAN ASSEMBL Y OF GOD CHURCH 29276 Military Rd S _ Road Modification Response Dear Mr. Hagenson: This letter responds to your request dated January 8, 2007, to waive required street improvements along Military Road South associated with your proposed development. After evaluating the existing and proposed conditions, review of Federal Way City Code (FWCC) provisions (Sections 22-1474, 22-1477, 22-1496), and direction provided by the City Council, the Public Works Department hereby rnodiries the requirements for street improvements based on the following: FWCC Section 22-1,477 — Modifications, deferments and waivers: This code section allows the Public Works Department to grant a request to modify, defer, or waive the required street improvements only, after consideration of four specific reasons. The reason most applicable here is contained in FWCC 22- 1477(3) "Proper vertical or horizontal alignments cannot be determined because the existing streets do not have correct alignments," and (4), "The required improvement is part of a larger project that has been scheduled for construction in the City's adopted Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program." Military lRoad South is classified as an arterial street corresponding to Federal Way Roadway Section K . This roadway section requires a 44-foot wide paved street with vertical curbs, six- foot planter strip, eight -foot sidewalk, three-foot utility strip, street lighting, and street trees all within a 78-Foot right-of-way. This road section is also listed in the City's adopted Capital Improvement Plan for 2009-2020 (adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, Table 111-19) with a project description requiring five lanes. This project will require a minimum of 100 feet of right-Ofway to meet the necessary needs of the proposed improvements. The existing right-of-way width on Military Road South across the frontage of the property is 60 feet. This width is inadequate based on the planned road sections listed above. Therefore, based on FWCC 22-1474(c), the City will require the following right-of-way dedication and land set aside: L:\CSDC\DOCS\SAVE\ 14829952052. DOC Mr. Hal Hagenson, P.E. Sound Consultants, LLC RE: Permit No. 07-101475-00-SM May 21, 2007 Page Two Dedicate a nine -foot wide portion of the subject property parallel to the right-of-way and extending across the entire property frontage for right-of-way purposes. Set aside an 11-foot wide portion of the subject property parallel to the right-of-way portion described above, extending across the entire property frontage. This area shall be set aside as a "Tract X", which is reserved for future right-of-way. The City will provide a Tract X agreement for signature approvals prior to the issuance of a building permit. ral Way After evaluating the existing conditions along Military the drectianRoad hprovided by the , review of eCity Council Code provisions (Sections 22-1496, 22 1 }, the Public Works Department hereby mdi iE:s the requirements for street improvements applicable to your permit application, as follows: No phys ical improvements to Military Road South are required. The applicant shall sign a No Protest to Local Improvement District Agreement prior to the issuance o a building permit. e of The conditions of this right-of-way modificationww`�'bapplicable ar°mime lone imit, t, the right-ofear from the -way this letter. If a building Permit is not Issued modification will be void, and a new request for modification must be submitted. If you have any questions, please contact Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer, at (253) 835-2731. Sincerely, �� N�J' 'J�' Ken Miller, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director KM:SRW:cb cc: William Appleton, P.E., Development Services Manager David Lee, Planning Sarady Long, Traffic Project File/SRW Day File L:\CSDC\DOGS\SAVE\14829952052_DOC CITY OF Federal Way RECEIVE® MAR U 2 zoo? GITY OF Fr-PZ nAL W?1'V BUIk.0 IN0 DEPT, PUBLIC WORKSDEPARTMENT 33325 eAvenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-2700; Fax 253-835-2709 w w�federa way. corn C NCURRENC APPLICATIO O7- l tm 31'0t✓ APPLICATION No(s) - � 0113cj � C.N Date _ 31A16 -7 Project Name Property Address/Location Parcel Number(s)1 2 Project Description PLEASE PRINT Type of Associated Project Preapplication Conference PCOCCSS I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) —L,G PfOccss IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rczone) Process VI _ SEPA w/Project SERA Only Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Single Family/Duplex Multifamily Tenant improvement Commercial None (feasibility only) Approval for City to perform analysis: Yes` No If NO: Applicant's Engineer performing analysis: Address: �'ontact Phone: X Applicant 101"W'1y, 5-W AC�7 Name: ,P,¢5)QK /�� r l`3444U Address: 297 27�. A1/l.�t✓•y'� City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: ; y� Email: Signature: . _Q Agent (if diFfereA than App[icanr) T i1�Ii�y,i 1J1.r�77 Name: Address: h'J� LLC; City/State �"�`� 4-15 -'/ 7 A0,_J OU17Z� �tO zip: -956�U., Phone: r� Pax: .�. : _ Emai 1:. Signature�{C30. Cc7 Owner 45 0LI Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax. Email: Signature: 5 Required Information — Application is incomplete and will be returned if not filled out. YesNo Has the property previously been reviewed for Concurrency? Concurrency Permit No: If yes, date of original application Is this an amendment to an existing Concurrency Permit`? Yes Land Use Type Existing Land Use Type Proposed *Please be as specific as possible will the project be phased? Estimated year of occupancy ~ Permit Submittal: The following items are required for all applications: Q' Completed and signed Concurrency Application: ( Traffic Generation as prepared by the Applicant's Engineer or requested to be prepared by City staff. Note here if by Applicant Engineer or by Staff V Application information to be verified by Traffic Staff Please enter a number in d, _win . I unknown riw unknown• Gross Floor Area (Square Footage) Existing-40 � — PrPropoposed Parking Spaces Existing Number of Dwelling Units Existin Proposed proposed Number of Employees Existing l r - proposed Parcel size (acres or square footage) Existin Staff will calculate the following unless the applicant's engineer has prepared a trip generation. Existing PM Peak Hour Trips Proposed PM Peak Hour Trips Net New PM Peak Hour Trips The applicant's Engineers estimate may be entered below: Existing PM Peak Hour Trips Proposed PM Peak Hour Trips Net New PM Peak Hour Trips *Analysis prepared by: use Period Parameter Quantity Studies Outliers Lower Data Range Upper Data Range °%Entering Rate Std Dev Equation Type Coefficient A Constant C R.2 Data Close to Rate? Data Close to Equat Closest Data Point Trips by Rate Trips by Equation githin Data Range? V> 2 ? 9>19? )utliers<5s? 7-intercept Tear 0? :td Dev/Rate>1.10? ^2>0.75? ttE1-:U 1YENDATION Trips Weight by Rate Weight by Equation RESULTS Weighted Average Entering Trips Exiting Trips Pass -By% Total New Trips Entering New Trips Exiting New Trips Church Weekday Evening Street Peak 560 Dwelling Units 4.800 17 0 2:000 49.000 52 0.66 0.99 Y y E 3.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 YES NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA YES NA NA NA NO NO NO NO STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RATE EQUATIO AVERAGE 3.17 3.17 1.65 0.00 1.65 1.52 0.00 1.52 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0.00 #REF! #REF! 0.00 #REF! #REF! 0.00 #REF! Enter cc Enter La Enter Ti Enter Ii Enter In Enter Qu Enter Nu Enter Nu Enter th Enter th Enter th Enter th Enter th Enter Lc Enter th Enter th Enter th Enter Ye Enter Ye Enter Re Note: calculi Enter Pa :)mments and Use ime Period TE Land Use Code adependent Variable aantity of Independent Variable umber of studies umber of outlying Data Points he Lowest Data Point he Highest Data Point he Percentage of Trips Entering the Site he Rate he Standard Deviation of the Rate )garithmic, Linear, Inverse, Semi -logarithmic, or Exponential. he coefficient of the variable of the equation. he constant of the equation he coefficient of variation. !s or No ;s or No ite or Equation ated square feet area and divided it by 1000 to find out the quantity ass -By Rate October 30, 2906 W.O. No. 200 .211 City of Federal Way Public Works 3350 1 st Way outh Federal Way, A 98063 Attn: Saraday Long A m- - W, Whipple Cansulting Englneers, Inc. 010 and Transportatlon Englneering Re: 06-1006 '8-UP & 06-100629-00-SE Midway amoan Assembly of God Church 29276 Mi itary Road South, Federal Way WA Transpo anon Managrrment Plan. Dear Sarady; As requested, this letter is intended to satisfy the Transportation (TMP) as stated �n Federal address the folloYving; traWay C(FWCC) Section 22-635. "The TMP shall 'City Code Management Plan ff+c contra!, parking demand and management, and traffic movement to the iadjacent street system.,, The Midway Samoan Assembly of God proposes the expansion located at 29276 � illtary Road South within the City of Federal Way. Midway Samoan hurch is meeting in an existingof there existing facility site has two acre s drives onto Military Road. residence located on the site and the Currently the Currently, there are no specific guidelines establis TMPs. + hed by the City of Federal Way for Project ❑escrJption I The proposed proj ct includes the construction of a new two phase single driveway ac ess, and a parking lot. The project also Proposes ulldrng with a existing residential building that is currently being used as the church. T is proposed to be constructed in two phases. The first P the removal of the building located in the southwest comer of the dot. T he new building 2,400 sf to classrooms in that are attachedt phase !s a phase is a rectangular on the north and east sides of the additional The church currently has two services on Sundays 9:30- building. Sunday school (at 9:00), but has no other activities that wouldnormally occur and y occur at a ESUBM1TTED 2528 N. Sullivan Rd. • JAN 2 2 2003 Spokane Valley, WA 99216 4 PO Box 1566 - Veradale,`W '` _DEPAL WAY Phone 509-893-2617 • Fax 509-926-0227 8 G DEPT. ®7-101136 traditional church (i.e, meetings, bible studies, etc.). �'pi�IIY about 100 people with aAttendance for the services is pproximately 30 vehicles. Parking Accommodation Parking for the proposed develo the proposed building and accessing through a single Paved pment will t0ta131 paved parking stalls located north of An additional °overflow" parking lot is proposed to aeeo driveway to Military attendance and future growth. This lot will be gravel, local ry Road South. mmodno larger than normal Provide parking for approximately 15-18 more vehicles, located north ❑f the paved lot, and While growth is expected at this church, the rate of growth is anticipated to be less than a typical church. due to its ethnic association Conclusions and Recommendations Therefore, based on the current parking demands from the co the proposed 31 paved parking stalls should accommodate the congregation for this church, As an added measure, the "overtlov�' parking Ivt will accommodate tumauts and future growth of the church. e proposed development. date non -typical larger Should you have any questions regarding the information Provided above, please do not hesitate to call me at (509)893-2617. P eXPIKEs 07-23-2007 Craig k MacPhee, P.E. Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc. cc: Tom Nishimura — Nishimura Associates File A�kCITY OF Federal May 15, 2007 FILECITY HALL �� 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com ESA Adolfson Attn: Teresa Vanderburg 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church, 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Ms_ Vanderburg: The purpose of this letter is to authorize the services of your firm for critical area review for the above -referenced site. I previously sent you a copy of the Wetland Consultant Task Authorization Form, which you signed and returned to me with an estimate. J have signed it and the proponent has signed it. Enclosed you will find a copy of the authorization form with all three signatures. Should you have ax�y Questions, I can be reached at 253-835-2644 or andy.bergsagel@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Andy Bergsagel Associate Planner enc: Wetland Consultant Authorization Form (signed by all three parties) File #07-101 136-00-Up Doc- I D. 40269 .-) FILE 1�kCITY OF Federal May 11, 2007 Tom Nishimura The Nishimura Associates 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 CITY HALL �� 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE WAIVER Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007), 29276 Military Road South Dear Mr. Nishimura: On March 29, 2007, the City of Federal Way received a preapplication meeting waiver request from you for the current Process W application for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church. I hereby waive the requirement for a preapplication meeting for the current proposal, pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) 22-1653(2)(a)(3): "The site has previously undergone preapplication, site plan, or other land use review for the same or similar development proposal and it is unlikely further preapplication review will provide any benefit to the city or applicant." Pursuant to FWCC 22-1653(2)(b), I am required to inform you as follows: "Waiver of preapplication review increases the risk of the application being incomplete or that the processing time will be increased." (However, it is unlikely that will be a problem in this case.) Sincerely, Kathy McClung Director of Community Development Services c: Owner. Midway Samoan Assembly of God, Attn: Pastor Popea Fualaau, 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Doc 1 D 40854 CITY OF ti Federal Way March 28, 2007 ESA Adolfson Attn: Teresa Vanderburg 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 CITY HALL LE 33325 8th Avenue Sou h Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. cam RE: File #06-104887-00-AD; REQUEST FOR ESTIMATE Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church, 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Ms. Vanderburg: Enclosed please find a consultant authorization form for wetland review of the above -referenced site. Please review the scope of work, provide a cost estimate (fill in the blank), sign the form, and return it to me within three days of receiving this letter. I will then review the estimate and if the figure is appropriate, I will route it to the proponent, requesting a signature and check. Should you have any questions, I can be reached at 253-835-2644 or andy.bergsagel@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, c- Andy Bergsagel Associate Planner enc: Consultant Authorization Fonn File No 07-101136 Doc. I.D. 40267 41k CITY OF Federal Way FILE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: March 27, 2007 City: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Consultant: ESA Adolfson Attn: Teresa Vanderburg 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206-789-9658 Project: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church 29276 Military Road South Federal Way, WA 98003 File No.: 07-101136-00-UP (Process IV Application for a Church) Project Proponent: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church c/o Tom Nishimura Nishimura Associates 733 7'1t Avenue, Suite 200 Kirkland, WA 98033 Project Planner: Andy Bergsagel 253-835-2644 (Phone) 253-835-2609 (Fax) Documents Provided: • Set of plans (received March 2, 2007) • Wetland Delineation Report by Genesis Resource Consulting (Winlock), dated March 31, 2006 a. �'Y'asi�Scope; Genesis claims that the wetland is Category III (50-foot buffer). The City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map shows the wetland as Category II (100-foot buffer). Please determine whether the wetland is Category II or Category M. 1. Review submitted documents for accuracy and conformance with: • FWCC 22-1: Definition of wetland. ■ FWCC 22-1356: Determination of wetland and regulated wetland. • FWCC 22-1357: Wetland categories and standard buffers. 2. Conduct site visit. 3. Confirm delineation. 4. Provide memorandum identifying additional information to be requested of applicant (if necessary). 5. Possible meetings on site and/or with applicant's wetland biologist. 6. Provide written response as to status of the wetland. Task Schedule: Provide task cost estimate within three days of receipt of this form. Task Cost: Not to exceed $ without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. (Consultant to fill in figure.) Acceptance: City of Federal Way (Planner) Date Date (Consultant) (Project Proponent) Date Doc. I.D. 40266 File No. 07-101136-00-UP RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENFI NEAR 2 9 ton The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment March 27, 2007 Andy Bergsagel Department of Community Development Services City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave. South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, Washington 98063-9718 RE: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Dear Andy Bergsagel, Midway Samoan Assembly of God would greatly appreciate your acceptance of the October 31, 2006 pre -application meeting and subsequent Conditional Use Permit Application and resultant reviews as a viable alternative to yet another pre -application meeting, for the following reasons: 1. The project has not changed significantly from the initial pre -application meeting and Conditional Use Permit application. 2. The site and surrounding neighborhood have also not changed at all during the last four years. 3. Although the city's codes and building standards may have been revised, the consultant team has been in regular contact with City staff, and the proposal has been designed to meet current city requirements. 4. Since the proposal is relatively straight forward, any discrepancies and/or deficiencies in design are apt to be minor, and can be addressed during the CUP process. Further, charging the church yet another fee after not refunding at least a portion of their initial CUP application fee would be unreasonable and unwarranted. On behalf of Midway Samoan, thank you for your consideration of our request. Should there be ay questions or comments, please call 1.877.223.2022, toll free. Sincerely, Thomas, - �tshimurra The Nishimura Associates Environmental Planning Landscape Design Project Development & Management 12737 Bel — Red Rd., Suite 220 • (425) 453.48U • Cellular (206) 310.2820 • Fax (425) 453.4889 311 South Lehua Street Kahului, Maui, HI 96732 • (808) 871.5701 The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment February 7, 2006 1�j v, e,4-,Y,t) Dept. of Community Development Services City of Federal Way 33325 8tn Ave. S. PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 RE: Midway Samoan Assembly of God To Whom It May Concern: Midway Samoan Assembly of God would greatly appreciate your acceptance of the October 31, 2006 pre -application meeting as valid for the following reasons: 1. The project has not changed significantly from the initial pre -application meeting; 2. The site and surrounding neighborhood have also not changed at all during the last four years; 3. Although the city's codes and building standards may be been revised, the consultant team has been in regular contact with City staff, and the proposal has been designed to meet current city requirements; 4. Since the proposal is relatively straight forward, any discrepancies and/or deficiencies in design are apt to be minor, and can be addressed during the CUP process. On behalf of Midway Samoan, thank you for your consideration of our request. Should there be any questions or comments, please call 1.877.223.2022, toll free. Sincerely, Thomas A. Nishimura The Nishimura Associates Environmental Planning Landscape Design Project Development 8 Management 12737 Bel — Red Rd, Suite 220 - (425) 453�4M - Cellular (206) 310.2820 - Fax (425) 453.4UO 311 South Lehua Streat Kahului, Maul, HI 96732 - (808) 871.5701 March 27, 2007 Andy Bergsagel Department of Community Development Services City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave. South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, Washington 98063-9718 RE: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Dear Andy Bergsagel, Midway Samoan Assembly of God would greatly appreciate your acceptance of the October 31, 2006 pre -application meeting and subsequent Conditional Use Permit Application and resultant reviews as a viable alternative to yet another pre -application meeting, for the following reasons: 1. The project has not changed significantly from the initial pre -application meeting and Conditional Use Permit application. 2. The site and surrounding neighborhood have also not changed at all during the last four years. 3. Although the city's codes and building standards may have been revised, the consultant team has been in regular contact with City staff, and the proposal has been designed to meet current city requirements. 4. Since the proposal is relatively straight forward, any discrepancies and/or deficiencies in design are apt to be minor, and can be addressed during the CUP process. Further, charging the church yet another fee after not refunding at least a portion of their initial CUP application fee would be unreasonable and unwarranted. On behalf of Midway Samoan, thank you for your consideration of our request. Should there be ay questions or comments, please call 1.877.223.2022, toll free. Sincerely, Thomas A. Nishimura The Nishimura Associates Page 1 of 1 Andy Bergsagel - Midway Samoan ROW Mod comments S From: Andy Bergsagel To: Sean Wells Date: 3/26/2007 9:51 AM Subject: Midway Samoan ROW Mod comments Sean: Thank you for the chance to comment. Here are my comments in advance of the meeting: 1. Have other churches been required to improve ROW? 2. They are doing a lot already. How can they be under the exemption level? 3. Need to clarify that they will dedicate ROW as part of this Process IV permit. 4. What will they be required to do in the strip if it is only dedicated? Plant something? - Andy file://C:\Documents and Settings\default\Local Settings\Temp\GW}00001.HTM 3/26/2007 CITY OF Federal Way DATE: March 22, 2007 TO: Andy Bergsagel, Planning Sarady Long, Traffic MEMORANDUM Public Works Department CC: Ken Miller, PW William Appleton, PWDS Rick Perez, Traffic FROM: Sean Wells, PWD(; SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) - (07-101475-00-SM) 29276 MILITARY RD S - Road Modification All: Take a look at this road mod request. Prepare comments before hand, and let's meet to discuss next week. I'll set up the meeting via GroupWise. - SRW SOUND CONWLTANTS, LLG KIRKLAND OFFICE SEAT ME OFFICE 10509 NE 12e Place 6484 — 41P Avenue SW Kirkland, WA 98034 Seattle, WA 98136 425-785-5053 Ph. 206-93"168 Ph_ 425.823-5313 Fax 205-938-7645 Fax e-=H, I.Moverizon.net e~, H.HagensonCcomcastcom January 8, 2007 City of Federal Way DCDS 3332&e Ave South P.O Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Re: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church File No. 06-100629400-SE & 06-100628-UP Mr. Shawn Wells, P.E. We are writing to request a modification to the Right of Way improvements required as part of the Process IV Conditional Use Permit application for the subject project. We ask that the proposed project be exempt from providing any Right of Way improvements to Military Road South. The basis of our request is as follows: 1. The ROW improvements would likely push the project over the stormwater flow control exemption threshold, thereby forcing the project to install a storm, detention system and impose a difficult financial burden on this small project. 2. The proposed project will not generate significant AM/PM Peak hour trips which might otherwise trigger improvements. Large meetings are generally restricted to weekends and off-peak hours. 3. It is our understanding that the proponent would be willing to sign a no protest agreement to any future transportation Local Improvement District for the ultimate improvements to Military Road South. Thank you for you consideration in this matter Sincerely, Hal Hagenson, P.E. Associate t colmM� Y5 ', l-vV&) 01�4wdo a r& re NOW C-Z�, 4�'-4— r.� FOw 3S u r -6-iS ;,4SS -TT > I - Wit r � �a — IA) ✓ 1 A i.w i i � ti. � � r r ' u J. I-E JM I h �'lf✓ U 7 CITY OF �. Federal June 12, 2007 Tom Nishimura The Nishimura Associates 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; FORWARDING CONSULTANT COMMENTS Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007), 29276 Military Road S. Dear Mr. Nishimura: The wetland report you submitted as part of the above -referenced application has been reviewed by the City's wetland/stream consultant, ESA Adolfson. Today I received a letter from Adam Merrill at ESA Adolfson, dated June 5, 2007. I am forwarding his letter to you. At this time, you and the church's wetland consultant must address his comments and resubmit the required information. Of special note, please make sure that when you mark the edge of the boundary, that the markers stay in place until the City's final decision has been issued and any conditions relating to the wetland have been addressed. Sometimes, a wooden fence is required along the edge of a wetland buffer, so it is important to keep the markers in place. You must resubmit your application materials to the City of Federal Way within 180 days of the date of this letter or your project will be cancelled. If you should have any general planning questions you may contact me at 253-835-2644 or andy.bergsagel@cityoffederalway.com. If you have questions about ESA Adolfson's comments regarding the wetland and stream, please contact Adam Merrill. Sincerely, f Andy Bergsagel Associate Planner enc: Letter from ESA Adolfson (Adam Merrill), dated June 5, 2007, received June 12, 2007 Resubmittal Form c: Fax to Tom Nishimura, 425-453-4889 Owner: Midway Samoan Assembly of God, Attn: Pastor Popea Fualaau, 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Doc. l D. 41243 FeoEPu. WAY \A[IRROR A SOUND PUBLIS+IING NEWSPAPER Affidavit of Publication Stuart Chemis, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, asemi-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, �� aforementioned place of publiall pation of said newspaper.f said time has been printed in an office maintained That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way L-1256 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 16th day of May. 2007 , and ending on the 16th day of MU, 2007, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. lication is the sum of That the which amount has been paiount of the fee d n full, or billd for the ed#atgthe legal ate according t RCW 125.46 65.16.090 Subscribed to. and sworn before me this 31st day of May, 2007. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way 1111jl1IrU ti�t•� •��' ... H.��i�ri OeN rc� s DTn r; Na'.� OiiWA���t``` 1414 S. 324th STREET, SUITE 0210, HDERAL WAY, WA 98003 w 253-925-5565 0 f A X: 253-925-5750 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007) Project Description: The proposal is for a new church to replace the existing facil€ties. All existing buildings are to be demolished. Phase I includes the instaliation of a 40 x 60 pre-engineered steel building as a multiple Purpose sanctuary with parking stalls and landscaping. Phase II includes classrooms and an expanded sanctuary, as well as ad- ditional parking. The site includes a stream buffer for an off -site stream. ,There is a wet- land and associated buffer on site. plicant/Owner: Midway Samoan Assembly o God Church (Pastor Popea Fualaau), 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Agent: The Nishimura Associates (Tom Nishimura), 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220, Bellevue, WA 98005 Project Location: 29276 Military Road South (Parcel Numbers 042104-9063 & 042104- 9032) Date Application Received: February 5, 2007 (additionai materials submitted later) Date Determined Complete: March 29, 2007 Known at This Time: The project will be re- viewed for consistency with all applicable codes, policies, and regulations, including Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; FWCC Chapter 19, `Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; FWCC Chapter 21, Surface and Stormwater Management"; FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning"; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP); King County Surface Water ❑esign Manual; and King County Raad Standards (as amended). The official protect file is available for public review at the Department of Community De- velopment Services (33325 8th Avenue Date of Notice of Application: May 16, 2007 Comment Deadline: 5 p.m., May 30, 2007 Hearing Date: To be determined. (A separate notice will be forthcoming.) Permits Required/Citation: Process IV Ap- pZl (File #07-10113&00-UP) pursuant to FC Chapter 22, Article VII, Hearing Ex- aminer's Decision. SEPA Environmental Determination: Forth- coming (File #07-101137-00-SE) Relevant Environmental Documents: Envi- ronmental Checklist, Technical Information Report (stvrmwater), Wetland/Stream Study Development Regulations and City Plans to be Used for Project Review and Consistency South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community Development Servic- es by the comment deadline listed above. Also, any person may appear at the Public Hearing of the Hearing Examiner tv ive comments orally. Only persons who su�mit written comments to the Director, or provide oral or written comments to the Hearing Ex- aminer may appeal the Process IV decision. City Staff Contact: Andy Bergsagel, Asso- ciate Planner Phone: 253-835-2644 FWM#-1256 Date of publication: 05/16/2007 A�kCITY OF Federal June 1, 2007 Tom Nishimura The Nishimura Associates 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 CITY HALL FILE 33325 8th Avenue South y Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; PUBLIC WORKS D.S. COMMENTS Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007), 29276 Military Road South Dear Mr. Nishimura: On May 11, 2007, I sent you a letter stating that the above -referenced application is complete. I also provided some technical comments from the Planning Division and other departments. At this time, I am providing you with the comments from Sean Wells of the Public Works Development Services Division. If you have questions about Mr. Wells' comments below, you may contact him at 253-835-2731. Also, I have heard from ESA Adolfson (the City's wetland/stream consultant for this project), and they should be sending me their.comments soon. I will be forwarding the consultant's comments to you, once I receive them. This letter provides additional comments, to go with the comments in the previous letter, dated May 11, 2007. Please make sure that you address the comments from both letters when you prepare your resubmittal materials. Also, you may want to wait to resubmit your materials until we send you the comments from our wetland/stream consultant. Public Works —Development Services Division (Sean Wells, 253-835-2731, sean.wells@cityoffederalway.com) We have reviewed the preliminary analysis and plans for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church date stamped received March 2, 2007, and found items that need to be addressed prior to receiving preliminary approval from Development Services. These items are in accordance with Chapters 21 and 22 of the Federal Way City Code and the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and are as follows: Pmliminary Engineering Plans: The minimum driveway width shall be 30 feet. Show the location of the 9-foot right-of-way dedication and the 11-foot Tract X (per the right-of- way modification). Show the required setbacks from the back of the Tract X. Show the proposed grading plan more accurately. Several contour lines are missing. State/show on the plans if the existing house and shed south of the proposed church are being demolished or not. Show the length of the dispersal trench. Mr: Nishimura June ], 2007 Page 2 6. Show the apparent required easement to connect the side sewer service to the sewer manhole off the southeast property corner. 7. If the building roof will be metal, it needs to be routed through the bioswale. See TIR comments for more information. 8. Show the location of the ADA required curb ramps to the sidewalk. Prelimina /Final Technical Information Report; 1. Use the current city file number on the report (07-101136-00-UP). 2. Use page numbers throughout the report. 3. Core and Special Requirements Analysis: a. Core 1: Identify the water feature as a classified stream, not a local drainage ditch. b. - Core 2: Since the exemptions for this do not apply, do not state all of them. It can be said quite simply that the project does not meet the exemption requirements listed in KCSWDM 1.2.2, and therefore an offsite analysis is required. C. Core 3: The downstream analysis identifies a severe flooding problem, and this section even identifies the "significant drainage problem" downstream. The conclusion that "the manner in which runoff is discharged does not create a significant adverse impact to... downstream flooding" is unjustified. The report clearly shows a 0.08 cfs increase in Q,00 runoff from the pre to post conditions, yet fails to account for the higher concentration dispersing from the PGIS areas (a Q,o of 0.21cfs, and a Qloo of 0.77cfs) than in the pre -developed conditions. Tie the conclusion that the flow is not significant back to Core #1 requirements. d. Core 3: Provide evidence of the 1979 pre -developed condition on the site. This is required per the Core 3 Exemption. The intent is to mitigate unaddressed impacts created by site alterations or improvements, such as clearing, which have occurred since May 1979. e. Core 8: If the building roof will be metal, it has to be accounted for and treated through the water quality facility. Please make some reference about this in this section. f. Special #2: Given that there is an immediate and adjacent severe flooding problem identified with the downstream analysis, a floodplain/floodway delineation will be required regardless of the perceived elevation difference stated. 4. Site Statistics Breakdown: The runoff for the proposed church and walk needs to account for the proposed addition of the classroom space. Please include these 0.06 acres in the NPGIS calculations. Note that by my calculations, this raises the change of Q,00 to 0.1cfs. 5. Preliminary Bioswale Design: a. Provide a facility design and sketch with the design calculations. b. Provide a water quality basin map showing the area that will be draining to the proposed bioswale. C. Note that the slope of 1 % requires underdrains. d. Finish the calculations of steps 3 through 6 (KCSWDM 6.3.1.1). e. Note that if the building roof will be metal, it has to be routed through the bioswale. This will affect the facility design significantly if required. SEPA Checklist: 1. Item B.3.c.l . If the roof surface is metal, it is required to flow through the bioswale, not bypass it. Please make mention as to the roof composition for the proposed structure. 2. Item B.3.d: Complete this section. File No. 07-101136-00-UP Doe I 41109 Mr. Nishimura June 1, 2007 Page 3 Planning Division (Andy Bergsagel, 253-835-2644, andy.bergsagel@cityoffederalway.com) 1. I had hoped to be able to spare you the trouble of revising your landscape plan, and I sent you a red - lined copy last time; however, since Public Works will be requiring 9 feet of right-of-way dedication and 11 feet for a Tract X for potential future right-of-way expansion (see below), you will have to redo your plans to show the required landscaping, etc., behind this 20-foot-wide strip. The 20-foot- wide "required" landscape strip must be behind the 20-foot strip along the right-of-way. (You may plant some grass and/or shrubs in the strip along the right-of-way). Please change the landscape plan to reflect the red -lined drawing I sent last time_ 2. Check the other sheets and make sure that they also show the 20-foot strip that Public Works is requiring. Resubmit the other sheets as necessary. Also, please show the building setbacks which are required for a church in the RM zone, per the zoning chart in FWCC 22-671: 30-foot front setback and 30-foot side setback. CLOSING Your project is now on hold until we receive the information requested. Please pay close attention to these resubmittal requirements. • With your resubmittal, please provide three copies of a response letter which addresses each issue listed. • For the plans requested, please provide six copies (folded to 8'/Z by 11 inch size). Plans must be complete sets, collated and stapled. • Please also provide four copies of the complete sets on 11 x 17 (stapled). • For the SEPA checklist, resubmit six copies. • For all other materials, please provide four copies. • Please use the enclosed Resubmittal Form_ You must resubmit your application materials within 180 days of the date of this letter or your project will be cancelled. If you should have any planning questions you may contact me at 253-835-2644 or andy.bergsagel@cityoffederalway.com. For questions related to other reviewers, please contact them directly. I look forward to receiving your resubmittal. Sincerely, Andy Bergsagel Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form c: Fax to Tom Nishimura, 425-453-4889 Owner: Midway Samoan Assembly of God, Attn 98003 Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire Greg Vause, Code Compliance Officer File No 07-101136-00-UP 1 Pastor Popea Fualaau, 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA Doc I D 41109 CITY OF Federal way DATE: May 22, 2007 TO: Andy Bergsagel,� FROM: Sean Wells, P./�04_ MEMORANDUM Public Works Department SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) - (07-101136-00-UP) 29276 MILITARY RD S - PWDS Technical Comments #1 We have reviewed .the preliminary analysis and plans for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church date stamped received March 2, 2007, and found items that need to be addressed prior to receiving preliminary approval from Development Services. These items are in accordance with Chapters 21 and 22 of the Federal Way City Code and the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and are as follows: Preliminary Engineering Plans_ 1. The minimum driveway width shall be 30 feet. 2. Show the location of the 9 foot right of way dedication and the 11 foot Tract X (per the right-of-way modification). Show the required setbacks from the back of the Tract X. 3. Show the proposed grading plan more accurately. Several contour lines are missing. 4. State/show on the plans if the existing house and shed south of the proposed church are being demolished or not. 5. Show the length of the dispersal trench. 6. Show the apparent required easement to connect the side sewer service to the sewer manhole off the south east property corner. 7. If the building roof will be metal, it needs to be routed through the bioswale. See TIR comments for more information. 8. Show the location of the ADA required curb ramps to the sidewalk. Preliminary/Final Technical Information Re art: 1. Use the current city file number on the report (07-101136-00-UP). 2. Use page numbers throughout the report. 3. Core and Special Requirements Analysis: a. Core 1: Identify the water feature as a classified stream, not a local drainage ditch. b. Core 2: Since the exemptions for this do not apply, do not state all of them. It can be said quite simply that the project does not meet the exemption requirements listed in KCSWDM 1.2.2, and therefore an offsite analysis is required. c. Core 3: The downstream analysis identifies a severe flooding problem, and this section even identifies the "significant drainage problem" downstream. The conclusion that "the manner in which runoff is discharged does not create a significant adverse impact to... downstream flooding" is unjustified. The report clearly shows a 0.08 cfs increase in Qloo runoff from the pre to post conditions, yet fails to account for the higher concentration dispersing from the PGIS areas (a Qio of 0.21cfs, and a Qioo of 0.77cfs) than in the pre -developed conditions. Tie the conclusion that the flow is not significant back to Core #1 requirements. d. Core 3: Provide evidence of the 1979 pre -developed condition on the site. This is required per the Core 3 Exemption. The intent is to mitigate unaddressed impacts created by site alterations or improvements, such as clearing, which have occurred since May 1979. e. Core 8: If the building roof will be metal, it has to be accounted for and treated through the water quality facility. Please make some reference about this in this section. 4. 5. f. Special #Z: G. _a that there is an immediate and adjacent 5_ jre flooding problem identified with the downstream analysis, a floodplain/floodway delineation will be required regardless of the perceived elevation difference stated. Site Statistics Breakdown: The runoff for the proposed church and walk needs to account for the proposed addition of the classroom space. Please include these 0.06 acres in the NPGIS calculations. Note that by my calculations, this raises the change of Qioo to O.lcfs. Preliminary Bioswale Design: a. Provide a facility design and sketch with the design calculations. b. Provide a water quality basin map showing the area that will be draining to the proposed bioswale. c. Note that the slope of 1% requires underdrains. d. Finish the calculations of steps 3 through 6 (KCSWDM 6.3.1.1) e. Note that if the building roof will be metal, it has to be routed through the bioswale. This will affect the facility design significantly if required. f. Provide a preliminary design for'the flow dispersal trench. CITY OF 44%�� Federal Way April 10, 2007 The Nishimura Associates Attn: Tom Nishimura 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 FILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; WETLAND CONSULTANT REVIEW ESTIMATE Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church, 29276 Military Road S. Dear Mr. Nishimura: Enclosed please find a consultant authorization form for wetland review of the above -referenced site. The consultant has provided an estimate and signed the form. The applicant or registered agent of the above -referenced file must sign the form and return the original to me in the mail or bring it to the front counter as soon as possible. You must also submit a check in the amount listed on the form. Please use the enclosed resubmittal form. Upon receiving the consultant authorization form with your signature as well as the check, I will send a copy of the form to the consulting firm, so that they may begin the review. Should you have any questions, you may contact me at 253-835-2644 or andy.bergsagel@cltyoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Andy Bergsagel Planner enc: Consultant Authorization Form Resubmittal Form File No 07-101136-00-UP Doc I D 40268 FILE CITY OF Federal May 11, 2007 Tom Nishimura The Nishimura Associates 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South y Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.c.ityoffederalway.com RE: File #07-101136-00-UP; COMPLETE APPLICATION/COMMENTS Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007), 29276 Military Road South Dear Mr. Nishimura: The City of Federal Way received your new Process IV application for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church on March 2, 2007. A new application was required because the application submitted in 2006 expired. After careful consideration of the incompleteness items listed in our previous letter, we have determined that the City will consider the application to be complete. We received a preapplication conference waiver request from you on March 29, 2007. Please refer to the enclosed "Preapplication Conference Waiver," which has been signed by the director. Therefore, we will consider the application to be complete as of March 29, 2007. However, please note that the project has been on hold pending response to the technical comments, such as wetland review by the City's wetland/stream consultant. This letter supersedes the previous letter we sent you on April 3, 2007. A Notice of Application will now be prepared and issued. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PHASING The proposal is for a new church to replace the existing facilities. All existing buildings are to be demolished. Phase I includes the installation of a 40 x 60 pre-engineered steel building as a multiple purpose sanctuary with parking stalls and landscaping. Phase II includes classrooms and expanded sanctuary, as well as additional parking. The site includes a stream buffer for an off -site stream. There is a wetland and buffer on site. If you want to avoid having to do another Process IV for expansion of the building, parking lot, stormwater facilities, etc., in the future, then you must provide all pertinent information for Phase II now. However, in terms of the floor plan and elevations for the future addition, you may do that as a Process II in the future. Alternatively, you may submit plans for that portion of the building, and if the building design is approved as part of the current Process IV review, you will have up to five years to complete the phasing. Process II is a quicker process and has no public notice requirements. TECHNICAL COMMENTS/REQUEST'FOR INFORMATION Please review the comments listed below from various reviewers. The City endeavors to provide land use decisions within 120 days. Even though the application is now complete, the project (both the Process IV and SEPA) will be on hold until you submit materials addressing these issues. (In other words, the 120- day review clock will be on hold.) Mr. Nishimura May 11, 2007 Page 2 Planning Division (Andy Bergsagel, 253-835-2644, andy.bergsagel@cityoffederalway.com) 1. I understand you had an agreement with the previous planner, Jim Harris, that a boundary line adjustment (BLA) would be required as a condition of approval, prior to issuance of a building permit. Therefore, we will remove BLA as an "incompleteness" item. Just keep in mind that a BLA will be required prior to issuance of construction permits. 2. The City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map shows a Category II wetland on site. You have submitted a wetland report and are claiming it is a Category III wetland. Pursuant to FWCC 22, Article XIV, Critical Areas, a Category II wetland requires a 100-foot buffer. A Category III wetland requires a 50-foot buffer. The City will be requiring peer review of the wetland study. Please sign the wetland consultant authorization we sent you and return it to us. The Site Plan by Dan Price says "Parking for 31 cars," but we count 33 spaces. Are the two spaces shown next to the handicap spaces actually handicap clearance space? If it is part of the handicap space, please show it with hatching. Please note that the parking ratio appears to be 1 space per 173 square feet of gross floor area. This count and ratio should be noted on the site plan. Please also include all parking information in the transportation management plan (TMP). Pertaining to the TMP, please contact the Public Works Traffic reviewer listed below. 4. Please refer to the enclosed Bulletin #042: Parking Lot Design Criteria. You show only a 24-foot- wide driving aisle. For 9 x 18 foot parallel parking stalls, the requirement is a 25-foot-wide aisle. The area of the proposed gravel overflow parking (Phase II) is not clearly indicated. However, all parking areas must be paved. Gravel is not allowed. Please note FWCC 22-1453 Surface materials: "(a) The applicant shall surface the parking areas, driveways and other vehicular circulation areas with a material comparable or superior to the surface material of the right-of-way providing direct vehicle access to the parking area." Therefore, to simplify the review process, I have simply crossed off the note "Potential Overflow Parking" on your plans. If this is a problem, please notify us. You would have to get approval from the Public Works Division for impervious parking areas. 6. Phasing. a. For the SEPA checklist review, please provide an 8.5 x 11 partial site plan showing the phasing of the building and parking areas (if any additional parking is anticipated). I would like to attach this to the checklist when we send the checklist to the State. b. Please clearly show the phasing on all applicable plans (Phase I and Phase II). You may provide an additional site plan, etc., for Phase II. C. Update and resubmit the SEPA checklist pertaining to phasing (see next comment). 7. You have submitted an environmental checklist, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act. The SEPA checklist will be reviewed in detail once the requested materials of this letter have been submitted and technical comments have been sent by other staff. Resubmit six copies of the revised checklist. File No. 07-101 136 Doc. I.D. 40849 Mr. Nishimura May 11, 2007 Page 3 The location of the trash and recycling enclosure must be shown on all applicable plans. Show the material that will be used to screen the trash and recycling receptacles. For siting or size requirements you may contact Rob Van Orsow (Public Works Dept.) at 253-835-2770 or rob.vanorsow@cityoffederalway.com. The landscape plan is lacking some information. Although it is customary for a landscape plan to have a separate legend of plants, we will accept the method of call -outs you provided. To simplify the review process, I have gotten permission from the Director to simply red -line the landscape plan with a few items, as follows. You will find a copy enclosed. If you would like to resubmit a revised landscape plan, you may do so. Otherwise, we will use the red -lined copy for the official approval, with the following changes. a. I crossed off the potential "overflow parking," since parking must be on an approved surface such as asphalt. b. I have noted the following text on the landscape plan, and red -lined some of these requirements. LANDSCAPE RE UIRMENTS • 20-foot-wide Type III landscaping strip along ROW. [FWCC 22-1566(c)] • 10-foot-wide Type III landscaping along north and south property lines, except that wetland and stream buffer may be left in a natural condition. [FWCC 22-1566(c)] • 20 square feet of landscaping for each parking space [FWCC 22-15671 I have noted as follows: "Please provide solid screen of bushes for parking area along road." (There were a few gaps, and it is important due to headlight issues along this busy road.) d. It is not clear what landscaping is being provided where Phase II will go, since there \is a label in the way. I assume it is grass, but you may plant shrubs there if you wish. You must also provide some landscaping along the north facade of the building. (See Community Design Guidelines below for specifics.) 10. Community Design Guidelines (FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIX). A church is considered an institution and would be subject to the design guidelines listed in FWCC 22-1639 for "institutional uses." a. Please show the location of the entrances on the site plan, landscape plan, etc. You must provide a paved pedestrian pathway (other than asphalt) from the street to the main entrance. It should be at least six feet wide. b. Please note FWCC 22-1635(c), pertaining to building articulation and scale. Several options are listed. The front of your building has a base of stone, but more articulation is necessary. The code states, "Building facades visible from rights -of -way and other public areas should incorporate methods of articulation and accessory elements in the overall architectural design..." In your case, it appears that the easiest way to meet the guideline would be to add a covered entranceway in the front [FWCC 1638(a)(8)]. File No. 07-101 136 Doc. LD. 40849 Mr. Nishimura May 11, 2007 Page 4 C. Lighting fixtures should not exceed 20 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields [FWCC 1638(a)(9)]. Please provide a sample diagram of the lighting fixtures for the parking lot. This, may be on one of the plan sheets or on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. d. At this point we would like to request a color -board. Please submit a color and materials board, preferably on 8.5 x 11 inch board or paper. If it must be 11 x 17, please make it fold in half for the file. Please do not paste on large samples of brick or stone that will not easily fit in a file. The color board may include paint chips and color pictures of the material (such as the proposed stone). Public Works —Development Services Division (Sean Wells, 253-835-2731, sean.wells@cityoffederalway.com) Comments will be forthcoming in a separate letter. We are considering the right-of-way modification request. Public Works —Traffic Division (Soma Chattopadhyay, 253-835-2745, soma.chattopadhyay@cityoffederalway.com) The Transportation Management Plan (TMP): a Extend driveway throat to 50 feet for vehicle storage and to prevent conflicts. ■ Provide more details on the following: Q1) Space (sq ft) allocated to the school. Q2) Survey on vehicle occupancy. Fire Marshall's Office (Chris Ingham, 253-835-7244, chris.ingham@southkingfire.org) A Certificate of Water Availability is required. Lakehaven Utility District (Brian Asbury, 253-946-5407) We previously sent you a map of sewer and water facilities at the site. Water • The existing water service/meter may not be adequate and will need to be evaluated under the Uniform Plumbing Code. A water service connection application is required for a separate meter/service for any new connection to the water distribution system, or modification to any existing service connection (e.g., larger service, abandonment of existing service(s), etc.), in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current `Fees and Charges Resolution'. File No. 07-101136 Doc. I D. 40849 r Mr. Nishimura May 11, 2007 Page 5 Sewer • A sewer service connection permit will be required for any new connection to the sanitary sewer system or any modification to the existing sewer service connection, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current `Fees and Charges Resolution'. Minimum slope for gravity sewer service connections is 2%. In addition to all other sewer service installation standards, installation of a Type 1, 48" monitoring manhole is required on the private building sewer line, for all non-residential connections. The sewer service connection may need to cross either a portion of the wetland buffer to connect to the existing sewer main located to the east of the wetland or Military Road South to connect to existing sewer main along the western margin of ROW. General • Applicant has not completed and submitted to Lakehaven all applications necessary to be able to determine the applicant's specific requirements for connection to Lakehaven's water and/or sewer systems to serve the subject property. Charges -payable -in -lieu -of -extension, and/or latecomer and/or earlycomer charges may be assessable against the property for facilities either previously constructed or to be constructed that provide direct benefit to the property. Lakehaven's Capital Facilities Charges are calculated on the basis of Equivalent Residential Units (ERU). Residential equivalency for non-residential connections will be estimated based on anticipated water use (1 ERU = 255 gallons per day for water and 220 gallons per day for sewer). Owner will be required to provide a reliable estimate of proposed water consumption (commercial and irrigation) for the property (information from a similar facility may be submitted in lieu of a new estimate). Lakehaven's 2007 Capital Facilities Charges are $3,196/ERU for water and $2,768/ERU for sewer. All comments herein are valid for one (1) year and are based on the proposal(s) submitted and Lakehaven's current regulations and policies. Any change to either the development proposal(s) or Lakehaven's regulations and policies may affect the above comments accordingly. Building Official's Office (Scott Sproul, 253-835-2633, scott.sproul@cityoffederalway.com) The Building Official's office has provided no technical comments yet, but the building occupancy of 148 is at odds with the TMP. CLOSING Your project is now on hold until we receive the information requested. Please pay close attention to these resubmittal requirements. • With your resubmittal, please provide three copies of a response letter which addresses each issue listed. • For the plans requested, please provide six copies (folded to 8% by 11 inch size). Plans must be collated and stapled together. • Please also provide four copies on 11 x 17 (stapled). • For the SEPA checklist, resubmit six copies. • For all other materials, please provide two copies. • Please use the enclosed Resubmittal Form. File No. 07-101136 Doc. I.D. 40849 Mr. Nishimura May 11, 2007 Page 6 You must resubmit your application materials within 180 days of the date of this letter or your project will be cancelled. If you should have any planning questions you may contact me at 253-835-2644 or andy.bergsagel@cityoffederalway.com. For questions related to other reviewers, please contact them directly. Sincerely, Andy Bergsagel Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form Preapplication Conference Waiver Red -lined Landscape Plan c: Fax to Tom Nishimura, 425-453-4889 Owner: Midway Samoan Assembly of God, Attn: Pastor Popea Fualaau, 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire Greg Vause, Code Compliance Officer File No. 07-101136 Doc. I.D. 40849 FILE CITY OF -V'= Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name. Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007) Project Description: The proposal is for a new church to replace the existing facilities. All existing buildings'are to be demolished. Phase I includes the installation of a 40 x 60 pre-engineered steel building as a multiple purpose sanctuary with parking stalls and landscaping. Phase II includes classrooms and an expanded sanctuary, as well as additional parking. The site includes a stream buffer for an off -site stream. There is a wetland and associated buffer on site. Applicant/Owner: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (Pastor Popea Fualaau), 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Agent: The Nishimura Associates (Tom Nishimura), 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220, Bellevue, WA 98005 Project Location: 29276 Military Road South (Parcel Numbers 042104-9063 & 042104-9032) Date Application Received: February 5, 2007 (additional materials submitted later) Date Determined Complete: March 29, 2007 Date of Notice of Application: May 16, 2007 Comment Deadline: 5 p.m., May 30, 2007 Hearing Date: To be determined. (A separate notice will be forthcoming.) Permits Required/Citation: Process IV Approval (File #07-101136-00-UP) pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article VII, Hearing Examiner's Decision. SEPA Environmental Determination: Forthcoming (File #07-101137-00-SE) Relevant Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist, Technical Information Report (stormwater), Wetland/Stream Study Development Regulations and City Plans to be Used for Project Review and Consistency Known at This Time: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes, policies, and regulations, including Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning"; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP); King County Sui face Water Design Manual; and King County Road Standards (as amended). The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8" Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the File No. 07-101136-00-Up Doc I D 40875 c�@ Director of Community Development Services by the comment deadline Iisted above. Also, any person may appear at the Public Hearing of the Hearing Examiner to give comments orally. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director, or provide oral or written comments to the Hearing Examiner may appeal the Process IV decision. City Staff Contact: Andy Bergsagel, Associate Planner Phone: 253-835-2644 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on May 16, 2007. File No 07-101136-00-UP Doc 1 D 40875 Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church F� CITY OF Zoning and Vicinity Map Federal way 29276 Military Road S. Process IV File #07-101136-00-UPSEPA File No. 07-101137-00-SE RS7. S 288TH ST S V RS7.2 s 4222800370 RS7.2 29UN ST R�7.2 S 288TH ST Walgre s E r 210491 7 210490 0 D 28806 B N 28817 j0 -G N' o, Safeway 0421049110 28810 0421049037 28855 0421049100 28852 RM2400 0421049119 29006 0421049123 29016 �0421Q3' N RM3600 w Korean Methodist Church 21049155 3001 .Il n 29026 ` 049045B N •� 0421049086 �-,,,e �° 29020 ��, 0421049061 29775 RM 1800 Lauretwood R 9.6 SF9P 0421049174 29401 Property Legend: Site King County Properties OFederal Way Zoning Boundary Landmarks Wetlands (1996 City Survey) Multi -Family Properties City of Federal Way SWM Properties School Properties City, County and State Park Properties Tracts/Private Open Space City of Federal Way Properties Source: City of Federal Way, Lakehaven Utility District, King County RM3600 5 0421D49062 0421 29200 F IM� Camelot 0421049222 0421049172 Square 3006 2Mobile 9002 Home E Park 0421049144 1 421049231 !10491 29250 3001 60 -- --- ° 0421049063 29276 R MnsGP 29424 421049155 3001 RM1000 1y :q CL Zoning Designations: Wetland Source: 1998 City survey. Boundaries are approximate and additional areas may exist BN NelghbOrhOOd BUSIneSS This is NOT a substitute for a field survey. BM2400 1 unit/2,400 Sq. Feet Scale: RM3600 1 unit/3,600 Sq Feet 0 100 200 Feet RS5.0 1 unit/5,000 Sq. Feet N RS7.2 1 unit/7,200 Sq. Feet I I j RS9.6 1 unIU9,600 Sq. Feet This map is accompanied by Governed by Development no warranties, and is simply Agreement a graphic representation- CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000, Fax 253-835-2609 www.cif yof federaiwov.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, Z hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: N Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance.(SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed 29 e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on > 2007. Project Name 1; File Number(s) p 7 - /0 // 3(0 - Signature Date 5-/yam KACD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /8/2007 4:34,00 PM w CITY OF `�;�".=-� Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007) Project Description: The proposal is for a new church to replace the existing facilities. All existing buildings are to be demolished. Phase I includes the installation of a 40 x 60 pre-engineered steel building as a multiple purpose sanctuary with parking stalls and landscaping. Phase II includes classrooms and an expanded sanctuary, as well as additional parking. The site includes a stream buffer for an off -site stream. There is a wetland and associated buffer on site. Applicant/Owner. Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (Pastor Popea Fualaau), 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Agent: The Nishimura Associates (Tom Nishimura), 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220, Bellevue, WA 98005 Project Location: 29276 Military Road South (Parcel Numbers 042104-9063 & 042104-9032) Date Application Received: February 5, 2007 (additional materials submitted later) Date Determined Complete: March 29, 2007 Date of Notice of Application: May 16, 2007 Comment Deadline: 5 p.m., May 30, 2007 Hearing Date: To be determined. (A separate notice will be forthcoming.) Permits Required/Citation: Process IV Approval (File #07-101136-00-UP) pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article VII, Hearing Examiner's Decision. SEPA Environmental Determination: Forthcoming (File #07-101137-00-SE) Relevant Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist, Technical Information Report (stormwater), Wetland/Stream Study Development Regulations and City Plans to be Used for Project Review and Consistency Known at This Time: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes, policies, and regulations, including Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning"; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP); King County Surface Water Design Manual; and King County Road Standards (as amended). The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8"' Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way; WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the File No 07-101136-00-UP Doc LD 40875 Director of Community Development Services by the comment deadline listed above. Also, any person may appear at the Public Hearing of the Hearing Examiner to give comments orally. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director, or provide oral or written comments to the Hearing Examiner may appeal the Process W decision. City Staff Contact: Andy Bergsagel, Associate Planner Phone: 253-835-2644 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on May 16, 2007. File No 07-101136-00-UP Doc. ID 40875 Midway Sainoan Assembly of GtA Church 13CITY OF Zoning and Vicinity Map Federal Way 29276 Military Road S. z Process IV File #07-101136-00-UPSEPA File No. 07-101137-00-SE RS7 S 288TH ST s RS7.2 S 288TH ST Valgree s 210491 7 11049 0 v 28806 B N 28817 �p N Safeway 0421049110 28810 0421049037 28855 0421049100 28852 RM2400 0421049119 29006 0421049123 29016 042104OTr 29026 i49048B111lY A 0421049086 29020 0421049061 29775 -" -I -- -- 1 4222800370 I RM 1800 :J 0421049062 �}@{�29200 �IYIJLJVLJI 0421049172. 29002 0421049149 210491 2825fl 29260 •471049063 29276 RM 1■ l 3ED0 Korean Methodist Church ST 38 0 w 1ti0 N _ 0421049166 `�,,+�° 3001 RE RM360n w 1� J N T 3 \ \ 0421049174 a[rua x o \\ RS7.2 29401 29424 � 1 421049155 3001 RM1800 q relwood JV�.alley e. d' 296TH ST AS9.S F 7.2 9477807777 - - - 9.6 s 296TH P 1 4� man sL Fp RM3600 421 4 Camelot 0421049222 Square 3006 Mobile _ Home ° Park 9v 42.1001 f 3001 Y Property Legend: Zoning Designations: Site King County Properties I BN Neighborhood Business OFederal Way Zoning Boundary Landmarks RM2400 1 unIU2,400 Sq, Feet Wetlands (1998 City Survey) Multi -Family Properties RM3600 1 unit/3,600 Sq. Feet City of Federal Way SWM Properties School Properties RS5.0 1 unit/5,000 Sq. Feet RS7.2 1 unit/7,200 Sq. Feet City. County and State Park Properties Tracts/Private Open Space RS9.6 1 unit/9,600 Sq. Feet City of Federal Way Properties Governed by Development Source_ Citv of Federal Way. Lakehaven Utility District, King County Agreement RM3600 S 796TH ST yh n 'Wetland Source: 1998 City survey- Boundaries are approximate and additional areas may exist. This is NOT a substitute for a field survey. Scale: N 0 100 200 Feet � I � This map is accompanied by no warranties, and is simply a graphic representation. Tamara Fix - Re: Legal Notice - - .... - --- ------ � Page 1 From: Teryl Heller <theller@fedwaymirror.com> To: "Tamara Fix"<Tamara.Fix@cityoffederaiway.com> Date: 5/14/2007 11:18:48 AM Subject: Re: Legal Notice Thanks, Tamara. Will publish 5/16/07 as requested. Hope you had a lovely Mother's Day!! Teryl Heller Federal Way Mirror 1414 South 324th Street, Suite B210 Federal Way, WA 98003 (phone) 253-925-5565 (fax) 253-925-5750 On May 14, 2007, at 9:01 AM, Tamara Fix wrote: > Please publish the following legal notice (Midway Samoan NOA, > 07-101136) in Wednesdays (May 16, 2007) issue. > Please furnish an affidavit of publication. > Thanks! > Tamara Fix > Administrative Assistant > City of Federal Way > PO Box 9718 > Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 > 253-835-2602 f CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South PO Box 9718 RECEIVED y Federal Way WA 98063-9718 RECEIN`, ED 253-8352607; Fax 253-835-2609 w w w. ci typffederal way.rorn MAY 2 3 zoo? CITY OF FEDERAL way 13WLDING DEPT. SIGN INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE Project Name: A1111)V .Je Project File No: Project Address: q�tlZ e9. Installed By It7 1 ��' �a ��� •r Date of Installation:" Location of Installation: a�ra�rag�e�aa�s����pM���aa®�a�xr�xa�ri�r��re�sa�Ra��a��a�aa��.�r��a�=Ra�e��u��ea�a�aRsa�e���ria�aa�Ms�a� I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the installation standards of the Department of Community Development Service's "Instructions for Obtaining & Posting Public Notification Signs" and that the sign will be maintained until a final decision is issued on the land use action. I understand that failure to return this certificate within five days of posting may result in delays, notice of corrections, and re -mailings at the applicant's expense. Installer's Name �- :i' Installer's Signature Date ell �3 J'L 167� Phone Bulletin #036 — August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Sign Installation Certificate The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment 12737 Bel -Red Rd Suite220, Bellevue, WA 98005 phone 425.453.4886 fax 425.453.4889 www.nishimuraassociates.com August 26, 2009 Mr. David Lee Associate Planner City of Federal Way P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 RE: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007), 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way Responses to comments received July 27, 2009 from David Lee File #07-101136-00-UP; Status Update Dear Mr. Lee, In response to the comments you sent to us on July 27, 2009 requesting further information, the answers are below in bold italics underneath the original question/comment received. 1. Item#1— Redesigned site plans showing the relocation of sewer and surface water drainage line (as discussed in item 2 above). Five sets of plans. Please find enclosed redesigned site plans (five sets). 2. Item #2 —A narrative explaining the intrusions into the wetland buffer and how it constitutes the minimum intrusion necessary Please see attached narrative explaining buffer intrusion. 3. Item #3 — Building elevations plans. Three sets of plans. Please see attached elevations plans (three sets). 4. Item #4 — Updated and revised SEPA Checklist. Eight copies. Please see attached updated and revised SEPA checklist (eight copies). 5. Peer review fee as discussed above. Please find enclosed check in the amount of S2,108 for the peer review fee. Environmental Planning Landscape Design Project Development 8 Management www nishimuraassociates.com 12737 Bel — Red Rd., Suite 220 • (425) 4534886 • Cellular (206) 310-2620 • Fax (425) 4534668 311 South Lehua Street Kahului, Maui, HI 96732 • (808) 871-5701 RESUBMITTED SEP' 01 2003 CITY OF FEDERAI! WAY BUILDING DEPT. The Nishimura Associates A Nehemiah Commitment If you have any questions regarding the information enclosed, please let us know. We look forward to hearing from YOU. S ip e6iely, Thomas A. Nishimura President/Owner cc: Midway Samoan Church EnvironmenW Planrrhrg Landscape Design Project Devowmen[ & Management 12137 Bel — Red Rd.. Mo 220 • (425I453.48B5 • Ce7lular CM) 310.2620 - fax (425)45345W 311 South Lehua StrW Kahulul, Maul, HI26M • {BDBj 871.5101 RECEIVED 40k CITY OF Federal Way MAR MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION MAR ® 2 20013EPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 Bch Avenue South 91`�''� A FK AL, WA`� PO Box 9718 l3UlLFPAINQ DEPT, Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cirvoffederalway.com 07-101131v- LAI 07-101137- � APPLICATION NO(S) Date Project Name , NktAWQ.0 S0►.l'1ndOLO A65tW u 6�CA NUVCil _ Property Address/Location _ 2Q2� (P �&lU" ZyA 5. V-e&,W tuo,!I w6 Parcel Numbers) 0 N z (014g 0 tP 3 a►nd Project Description #0 0�I a z!D t tPQ pie' LwtA!�A 5e �ocwc�rvl . t�h 3 �r�a�ls►scapi PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification J Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director=s Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) (�C _ Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI L( C, SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information mY ` ^ 3&6)0 Zoning Designation �Comprehensive Plan Designation 4160',OW. 00 Value of Existing Improvements 0 359 000.00 Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): 200*3 R Occupancy Type &Y 5um-, C. Construction Type 5 *t. elms , D Applicant "WAA toIAaI( 6OGA Name: ?OLD( Po yo, Fulito c k Address: zq Z1 j, 46�►.t" ?DOA g City/State: Zip: G 8003 Phone: ry ao - 3301a Fax: Email: Signature: Agent (if Jiff nt than Applicant) , Name:"{ k.500,L4.k ITOVW t�1s4�1 ulra Address: 1141tq ?X\-Rd Road 15At' 22,0 City/State: \-J%W y At W �, ' Zip: q�006 Phone.. Y q6 3 ' qe 0W Fax: �I-_qtr -9 Email:. Signature: P � ' Owner Name: r Vd Pea, Fvu"a Address: +�p� 2.1 � 1\1 !R� 5 City/State: Fee f l W & u Zip: gqibo3 _J Phone: RD ,:�O je Fax: Email: Signature: •�� Bulletin #003 — August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL RESUBMITTAL DATE: September 1, 2009 TO: Will Appleton, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: David Lee FILE NUMBER(S): 07-101136-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) PROJECT ADDRESS: 29276 MILITARY RD S ZONING DISTRICT: RM 3600 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a new church to replace the existing facilities. All existing buildings to be demolished. Build a 40 x 60 pre-engineered steel building as a multiple purpose sanctuary with 31 parking stalls and landscaping. LAND USE PERMITS: Preliminary Plat, SEPA PROJECT CONTACT: THE NISHIMURA ASSOCIATES, LLC THOMAS NISHIMURA 12737 BEL-RED RD Suite 220 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Site Plan SEPA Checklist Changes Narrative owvwlete5 tD� q/l(-( PL-1-r-sc, CITY OF Federal July 27, 2009 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Mr. Thomas Nishimura The Nishimura Associates, LLC 12737 Bel -Red Road, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98005 Re: File #07-101136-00-UP; STATUS UPDATE Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church (2007); 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Nishimura: Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you and your clients on July 22, 2009. As agreed upon in the meeting, this letter is to serve as a meeting recap and road map to conclude the review of this project and ultimately have it brought before the hearing examiner. In an effort to efficiently cover all the major points brought up at the meeting, I will list the points in numerical form. 1. The applicant has the ability, upon request, to present their project to the hearing examiner without a favorable staff recommendation if the applicant desires. 2. City staff has agreed to cease the use of outside environmental consultant review in the event that there are no direct intrusions (namely the sewer and storm drainage line) into the wetland/stream. City recognizes that there will be wetland buffer intrusions of the northwest comer of the proposed parking lot and the possible intrusion of surface water dispersion trenches into the wetland buffer. The any wetland buffer or stream buffer intrusion may not be more than 50 feet into the wetland or stream buffer. The applicant must demonstrate that any intrusion is the minimum intrusion necessary. _ 3. It is. our understanding that it is the intention of the applicant to move both the surface water drainage pipe and sewer line outside of the wetland/stream. The city's analysis and recommendation to the hearing examiner will be based on this understanding. 4. The city will commit to a two week technical review upon the resubmittal of plans. 5. The building permit may be submitted to the city at any time during this process. However, the building permit cannot be issued without land use approval. 6. The amount of $2,108 for the initial peer review completed by ESA Adolfson is still due. The following items should be submitted/addressed in the next resubmittal package: 1. Redesigned site plan showing the relocation of sewer and surface water drainage line (as discussed in item 2 above). Five sets of plans. 2. A narrative explaining the intrusions into the wetland buffer and how it constitutes the minimum intrusion necessary. 3. Building elevation plans. Three sets of plans. 4. Updated and revised SEPA checklist. Eight copies. 5. Peer review fee as discussed above. File #07-101136-00-W Doc I.D. 50869 Mr. Thomas Nishimura Page 2 July 27, 2009 Assuming the next resubmittal package meets the city's requirements to proceed to hearing with staff recommendation of approval, the applicant should expect the following timeline: • Two weeks to review resubmittal package, write the staff report, and issue a SEPA determination. • A two week SEPA comment period. • A two week appeal period. • A two week notification period for the public hearing • The public hearing. • A two week (10 working days) hearing examiner decision period. • Issuance of decision. • A two week appeal period of the hearing examiner decision.' • A total of 10 to 12 weeks. After the Hearing Examiner Decision appeal period has expired, the building permit (if review has concluded) may be issued. Please feel free to contact me at (havid--g k Eyes c ft l�+i S.:.o 3?y or (253) 835-2622, with any questions or concerns you may have with your project. Sincerely, David Lee Associate Planner c: Greg Fewins, Director of Community Development Services Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager 1 This appeal period may be waived if the applicant is the only party of record. File N07-101136-00-UP Doc I.D 50869 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 9, 2007 TO: Will Appleton, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, Federal Way Fire Department FROM: Andy Bergsagel FOR DRC MTG. ON: March 22, 2007 - Internal FILE NUMBER(s): 07-101136-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: The previous application expired, so they had to start over. PROJECT NAME: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH PROJECT ADDRESS: 29276 MILITARY RD S ZONING DISTRICT: RM 3600 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Build a 40 x 60 pre-engineered steel building as a multiple purpose sanctuary with 31 parking stalls & landscaping. Wetland concerns. LAND USE PERMITS: Process IV with SEPA PROJECT CONTACT: THE NISHIMURA ASSOCIATES, LLC THOMAS NISHIMURA 733 7TH AVE Suite 200 425-822-4886 (Work) MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Environmental Checklist Title Report Wetland Report Pictures (1 set) TMP Letter Storm Drainage Report Quarter -Section Map Topographic Survey Building Floor Plan Site Plan Schematic Plan Landscape Plan r City of Federal Way s�1 �rlc Wetland Inventory Field Form N U1 �7 l�.l I �� CIF Wetland Number 1 /4 SecVi'wn/Rng ' a �- r1 ( av, 2,2007 Location (addrssecross-streats) Team Members %lLI Date Feld Check: Base Map #:. �� _ Windshield Acces ite Acces ite Not Accessed FIELD DATA f"r%u,nrA;n (_lace nnminant Snn % total WL r Notable Wildlife Features 90 Snags:#'s Z6" Z12" 2,24" Heights: turf l a� �a ,-� 6rc��nnerC� /nletpresent�N; width9r111UC-flow& N / Outlet present: (�N; width u flow: !Y N None Observed None Observed Water Source stream iam) /n6649z 0 sheet flow floodplain seeps Human Disturbances: Buffer Conditions: /y/��,(,� �o /Ia �% aj t�s �'e'` %uwh rHa`'1 o 44 cd v-e , P j w P4-, Aa 001. OFFICE DATA �r�, NRCS Soil Unit: 0/ 9-C WL Rating JL Approximate Size: 500 tos 2,500 sq.ft z 1 acres 2 acre z 2,500 sf, s '/2 acre z 2 acre�-.<5 cre z /2 acre, s 1 acre 5 acre COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS (r`] W E1�� �.'•1 � ��?� �, i 'j IGe�15 " � ;� _ r..i � a r " G+r 1 Yt "� .: �.. � •�. �'�1'En1M1'1 (/ "�' /'o �' S -• "• o,, M ,q b y n��li�a� gyp, S 6 TICOR TITLE COMPANY 600 SW 39th Street, #100, Renton, WA 98055 (425)255-7575 FAX (425)255-0285 Date: February 9, 2007 at 08:00 AM Prepared For: Midway Assembley of God 29276 South Military Road INQUIRIES SHOULD BE MADE TO: UNIT 1 (425)255-7472 Donna Roetter Arlene Naputi Order No.: Your Reference: Charge: Tax: SECOND REPORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A TITLE IS VESTED IN: Midway Samoan Assembley of God, a religious, non-profit corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: 6359553-1 Midway Assembley of God/ $ 330.00 $ 29.04 RECEIVED MAR 0 2 Z007 O �OF FEDING RA WAY Beginning at a point on the west line of the northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, south 535 feet north of the southwest corner thereof; thence north 220 feet; thence east parallel with the south line of said quarter section 1145.13 feet to the easterly arm of drainage ditch; ❑thence southwesterly along said drainage ditch to a point east of the point of beginning and 1034.05 feet distan therefrom; thence west parallel with the south line of said quarter section 1034.05 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT county road passing through said property; AND EXCEPT that portion lying westerly of Military Road. Parcel B: That portion of the southwest quarter of Section 4, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the easterly margin of Military Road as conveyed to King County by Deeds recorded under Auditor's File Numbers 3022385, 3029951 and 4819792, records of said county, with the northwesterly margin of the drainage ditch, said point called Point A; thence northwesterly along the easterly margin of Military Road 248 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue northwesterly along said easterly margin to the north line of the south 535 feet of said southwest quarter; thence easterly along said north line to the northwesterly margin of said drainage ditch; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly margin to a point which is 320 feet northeasterly of Point A; thence southwesterly to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING PLAT Certificate Schedule A Policy No. 6359553-1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE A CONTINUED The land referred to herein is described as follows: Parcel A: Beginning at a point on the west line of the northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, south 535 feet north of the southwest corner thereof; thence north 220 feet; thence east parallel with the south line of said quarter section 1145.13 feet to the easterly arm of drainage ditch; thence southwesterly along said drainage ditch to a point east of the point of beginning and 1034.05 feet distant therefrom; thence west parallel with the south line of said quarter section 1034.05 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT county road passing through said property; AND EXCEPT that portion lying westerly of Military Road. Parcel B: That portion of the southwest quarter of Section 4, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the easterly margin of Military Road as conveyed to King County by Deeds recorded under Auditor's File Numbers 3022385, 3029951 and 4819792, records of said county, with the northwesterly margin of the drainage ditch, said point called Point A; ❑thence northwesterly along the easterly margin of Military Road 248 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue northwesterly along said easterly margin to the north line of the south 535 feet of said southwest quarter; thence easterly along said north line to the northwesterly margin of said drainage ditch; ❑thence southwesterly along said northwesterly margin to a point which is 320 feet northeasterly of Point A; thence southwesterly to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS: 1. EASEMENT FOR GRADING OF STREET SLOPES, AS NECESSARY, OVER PORTION OF PREMISES ADJOINING STREET OR ALLEY AS GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: December 2, 1938, January 30, 1939 and July 30, 1957 RECORDING NUMBER: 3022385, 3029951 and 4819792 2. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon said property and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term of lease. 3. NOTICE OF SEWER AND/OR WATER CONNECTION CHARGE: GIVEN BY: King County Water District Number 124 RECORDED: June 1, 1981 RECORDING NUMBER: 8106010916 4. Matters disclosed by Survey recorded under Recording Number 9806169002. 5. DELINQUENT GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: DELINQUENT YEAR: 2006 AMOUNT BILLED: $87.13 AMOUNT PAID: $0.00 AMOUNT DUE: $87.13 PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTIES TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 042104-9063-02 LEVY CODE: 1207 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: LAND: $0.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $0.00 AFFECTS: Parcel A. 6. General property taxes and special district charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1 st; 2nd half delinquent on November 1 st) Total Taxes for Year 20007 Amount Billed: $94.95 Amount Paid: $0.00 Amount Due: $94.95 Tax Account Number: 042104-9063-02 Levy Code: 1207 Current Assessed Value: Land: $0.00 Improvements: $0.00 AFFECTS: Parcel A. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as partially exempt. If said taxes are not paid prior to the forthcoming sale or death of the currant taxpayer, the exemption will be disallowed and the full amount for current and/or prior year, if any, will be due. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 042104-9063-02 AFFECTS: Parcel A. 8. DELINQUENT GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: DELINQUENT YEAR: 2006 AMOUNT BILLED: $777.06 AMOUNT PAID: $0.00 SCHEDULE B (Continued) AMOUNT DUE: $777.06 PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTIES TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 042104-9032-00 LEVY CODE: 1207 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: LAND: $53,300.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $5,000.00 AFFECTS: Parcel B. 9. General property taxes and special district charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1 st half delinquent on May 1 st; 2nd half delinquent on November 1 st) Total Taxes for Year 2007 Amount Billed: $752.62 Amount Paid: $0.00 Amount Due: $752.62 Tax Account Number: 042104-9032-00 Levy Code: 1207 Current Assessed Value: Land: $53,300.00 Improvements: $5,000.00 AFFECTS: Parcel B. NOTES: A. In the event the transaction fails to close and this commitment is cancelled, a fee will be charged to comply with the State Insurance Code and the filed schedule of this Company. B. Abbreviated Legal for purposes of King County Recorders Office is: Ptn. NE 1/4, Sec. 4, Twnshp 21 N, Range 4E, W.M. . C. 24 MONTH OWNERSHIP SEARCH: The vesting deed into vestees herein was recorded on January 5, 1998, recorded under Recording Number 9801050722. D. We find no adverse matters affecting the name(s) of Midway Samoan Assembly of God, in the King County records. cc: Nishimura Associates Midway Assembley of God df/sl/09/30/2005 /an/02/15/2007 PLAT Certificate Schedule B #3 Facing Southeast Facing East ij,*.� f�171, ,Ct'•+�,•'. Y`v��� �.;'..}r: 1:: 'l �i;�:. #7 Facing Northwest Toward Military Road #8 Facing Northwest Corner VICINITY MAP Midway Samoan Assembly of God 29276 Military Road S Federal Way, WA 98003-7916 S 28W, 282M co 3:283rd St > S 28401 U1 N, S 284th P1 S 2851h P1 6 2861h Ln CO. LO to p S 2@8 St. c" -S 293rd St 296til st�' tp A1. 8 297th P1 ca S; 1" park r ro 4 S 295th P1 (A 'CL rM 5 301301 $1e 'r S 301st Si co :8 302nd St S 301st P1 eo .44 > 22nd Ct S . < > f st S'304th St Sgaft P1 mmt zako" 2004; NAVTEQ- 300in 00ft 2.54UI P1 'S 286th- St- S 29M St 0 45Y1 S 2912nd P1 5F C2 4"M iIE S 299th. St 3 3001h P1 S Mind P1 6 N3td Ct' -5 304th S t. RECEIVED, MAR 0 2 2007 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. m °p 3 w g 3 9NI � o S5 LOOZ 9 adv II t% g w < s O = 4. o S 84 . co �U- kid Qw U2 1a yta � j U O Im �Fa N U m w N0cs3 ell f ' ' W m �f w � / o d w C3 0% w Ay W _ wZ — 1h 410 y o� N 3 , 3 s N T a I ru rf~ rb -of ,• _ Fv US D u� 0° 6 w w o bit• ' � L��' U LL LS 4i5 5�3'36 X R� PP'�MdNB� 0 x o t, 910 u AGE � N �lP k20 pNp� N FpG OF PA HQ 20 / X � X U `NARY ,OAS S0�}TH IN M m City of Faded Way — GIS Dfton — P.O.Bm 9718 — 33325 8tb Ave. — FWuW W Mip 6 Sma T AL ..72 .. ....... 0:6 In P I Il ST W 21QS"M — (253) - 835 - 7000 — www.dtyoffedea".com ".l -47R - . % * W-4 IN' Its r f C Nk ..... ...... U. "aT,. 70 Mir ZM 1 411 . 24 v "= MAR, 1. p. R L % 135 1 10, L 344. M L L ll� 2 wv a:z 'ki Daumm V Map 21 NE-04-21-04 ry stream =3 subdtyWm BoLmday L2km M CcnW lrftx My Unft F-1 Tex Pffcel B—ftry Federal Wayerr Fed 25ft Cantow D07"al FWPAAElounctary BuNdtngB. Commerow and Reeldantial on asn�rr�.rn CD -7, Paved Edge of Redway Sit Contour Inleval Other JurWdJon a Ion 2w 401 .5 Ouster Section ConlotffAtfas Sit Cntwx Dwasslon Owner Section B-nd-ry F�K CITY OF Federal Way DATE: May 22, 2007 TO: Andy Bergsagel FROM: Sean Wells, P.E. MEMORANDUM Public Works Department r—�L� SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) - (07-101136-00-UP) 29276 MILITARY RD S - PWDS Technical Comments #1 We have reviewed the preliminary analysis and plans for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church date stamped received March 2, 2007, and found items that need to be addressed prior to receiving preliminary approval from Development Services. These items are in accordance with Chapters 21 and 22 of the Federal Way City Code and the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and are as follows: Preliminary Engineering Plans: 1. The minimum driveway width shall be 30 feet. 2. Show the location of the 9 foot right of way dedication and the 11 foot Tract X (per the right-of-way modification). Show the required setbacks from the back of the Tract X. 3. Show the proposed grading plan more accurately. Several contour lines are missing. 4. State/show on the plans if the existing house and shed south of the proposed church are being demolished or not. 5. Show the length of the dispersal trench. 6. Show the apparent required easement to connect the side sewer service to the sewer manhole off the south east property corner. 7. If the building roof will be metal, it needs to be routed through the bioswale. See TIR comments for more information. 8. Show the location of the ADA required curb ramps to the sidewalk. Preliminaryffinal Technical Information Report: 1. Use the current city file number on the report (07-101136-00-UP). 2. Use page numbers throughout the report. 3. Core and Special Requirements Analysis: a. Core 1: Identify the water feature as a classified stream, not a local drainage ditch. b. Core 2: Since the exemptions for this do not apply, do not state all of them. It can be said quite simply that the project does not meet the exemption requirements listed in KCSWDM 1.2.2, and therefore an offsite analysis is required. c. Core 3: The downstream analysis identifies a severe flooding problem, and this section even identifies the "significant drainage problem" downstream. The conclusion that "the manner in which runoff is discharged does not create a significant adverse impact to... downstream flooding" is unjustified. The report clearly shows a 0.08 cfs increase in Qioo runoff from the pre to post conditions, yet fails to account for the higher concentration dispersing from the PGIS areas (a Qlo of 0.21cfs, and a Qioo of 0.77cfs) than in the pre -developed conditions. Tie the conclusion that the flow is not significant back to Core #1 requirements. d. Core 3: Provide evidence of the 1979 pre -developed condition on the site. This is required per the Core 3 Exemption. The intent is to mitigate unaddressed impacts created by site alterations or improvements, such as clearing, which have occurred since May 1979. e. Core 8: If the building roof will be metal, it has to be accounted for and treated through the water quality facility. Please make some reference about this in this section. f. Special #2: G. _ --n that there is an immediate and adjacent s-, ere flooding problem identified with the downstream analysis, a floodplain/floodway delineation will be required regardless of the perceived elevation difference stated. 4. Site Statistics Breakdown: The runoff for the proposed church and walk needs to account for the proposed addition of the classroom space. Please include these 0.06 acres in the NPGIS calculations. Note that by my calculations, this raises the change of Qioo to 0.1cfs. 5. Preliminary Bioswale Design: a. Provide a facility design and sketch with the design calculations. b. Provide a water quality basin map showing the area that will be draining to the proposed bioswale. c. Note that the slope of 1% requires underdrains. d. Finish the calculations of steps 3 through 6 (KCSWDM 6.3.1.1) e. Note that if the building roof will be metal, it has to be routed through the bioswale. This will affect the facility design significantly if required. f. Provide a preliminary design for the flow dispersal trench. Y r GENESIS RESOURCE CONSULTING LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 142 Lamprecht Road Winlock, WA 98596 GRconsidtin-Ca juno.com 360-520-2847 OCT 3 1 2006 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. MIDWAY SAMOAN CHURCH WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT FEDERAL WAY WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY PREPARED FOR: Pastor Popea Fualaau Midway Samoan Church 29276 Military Road South Federal Way, Washington 98003 253-804-0404 PREPARED BY: Genesis Resource Consulting 142 Lamprecht Rd Winlock, Washington 98596 360-520-2847 March 31, 2006 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background................................................................................................................... 3 ResourceConcerns........................................................................................................ 3 WetlandDelineation.................................................................................................. 3-4 Resultsand Discussion.............................................................................................. 5-8 Summary........................................................................................................................ 8 LiteratureCited............................................................................................................. 9 Sheet 1: Vicinity Map Sheet 2: Parcel / Soil Test Pit Locations Map Sheet 3: Wedand Location Map Sheet 4: Soils Map Sheet 5: NWI Map Appendix A. Test Plot Data Forms Appendix B: Wetland Rating Sheets 0) BACKGROUND This 86,684 square foot parcel (1.99 ac) is located at 29276 Military Road South Federal Way Washington. NE Sec 04 T21 R-4, King County. The current use at the site is commercial and single family residential. RESOURCE CONCERNS Mapped wetlands and streams can be environmentally sensitive areas with local State or Federal regulators. Genesis Resource Consulting (GRC) has reviewed existing maps, historical photos and mapping for this area as well as made a site reconnaissance to determine resource concerns for wetlands, streams or other environmental issues at or adjacent to this parcel. WETLAND DELINEATION Genesis Resource Consulting completed a field reconnaissance of the project site on March 16, 2006 and subsequent wetland delineation. The delineation was conducted on March 29, 2006 in cloudy, dry weather conditions. WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY Genesis Resource Consulting (GRC) completed the wetland delineation for the Midway Samoan Church project. The delineation followed the Routine Determination Method described as per the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (WSDOE 1997). According to the manuals, jurisdictional wetlands axe defined as: Those areas that are inundated or satarraled by surface orground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetarian oically adapted for life in salaratecl soil conditions. Wetlandsgenerally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and sumlar areas The Routine Determination Method uses three parameters to determine if wetlands exist in a given area: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology. Except in certain situations defined in the manual, evidence of a minimum of one positive wetland indicator from two of the three parameters (hydrology, soil, and vegetation) must be found in order to make a positive wetland determination. Prior to evaivati ig the site, GRC reviewed existing information to assist with the determination of wetland occurrences on the project site. This review included the King County Soil Survey, National Wetland Inventory maps, USGS Topographic Quadrangle maps and aerial photographs. 3 In order to conduct the wetland delineation, GRC established numerous data observarion points within the confines of the project area that corresponded with the terrain features, vegetation patterns, mapped soil areas, and hydrologic indicators. Of these data observation points, four (4) locations were chosen as representative samples for data sheets. GRC characterized the vegetation, soils, and hydrology at each of the observation points and used the information gathered as a basis for making the wetland determinations. Vegetation on the site was compared to the National List of Plant Species that Occur in ❑s']etiands: 1988 - Northwest (Region 9) (Reed 1988) to determine plant wetland indicator status. This list places plants into four categories: Obligate wetland plants (OBL) -- plants likely to occur in wetlands greater than 99 percent of the time. Facultative wetland plants (FACIV) -- plants likely to occur in wetlands 67 to 99 percent of the time. Fucvltatr»o plants (FAQ -- plants equally likely to occur in wetland and non - wetland areas (34-66 percent of the time). Facultative apland plants (FACU) -- plants that only occur in wetlands 1 to 33 percent of the time. Hydrophytic vegetation are macrophytic plants that occur in areas where the frequency and duration of inundation or soil saturation produce permanently or periodically saturated soils of sufficient duration to exert a controlling influence on the plant species present. The vegetation occurring in a wetland may consist of more than one plant community. Hydrophytic vegetation is present when more than 50 percent of the dominant species have an indicator status of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Hydric soils are classified into two broad categories: organic and mineral. Organic soils (Histosols) develop under conditions of nearly continuous saturation and/or inundation. Organic hydric soils are commonly known as peats and mucks. All other hydric soils are mineral soils. Mineral soils have a wide range of textures (sandy to clayey) and colors (red to gray). Mineral hydric soils are those periodically saturated for sufficient duration to produce chemical and physical soil properties associated with a reducing environment. They are usually gray and/or mottled immediately below the surface horizon, or they have thick, dark - colored surface layers overlying gray or mottled subsurface horizons. The project site was examined for areas of evident wetland hydrology characteristics. These include areas where the presence of water has an overriding influence on characteristics of vegetation and soils due to anaerobic and reducing conditions, respectively. Such characteristics are usually present in areas that are inundated or have soils that are saturated to the surface for sufficient duration to develop hydric soils and support vegetation typically adapted for life in periodically anaerobic soil conditions. 61 u RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The National Wetland Inventory (NWl) indicates no wetlands exists at or adjacent to this parcel (Sheet 5). GIS mapping indicates no wetlands are present or adjacent to the site. SOILS The Soil Survey of King County (Snyder et al. 1973) shows the soil unit on the property to be Alderwood, Arents Alderwood and Orcas. A brief soil description for this series follows: Alderwood Mapping Symbol AgB The Alderwood series consists of moderately well -drained soils underlain by consolidated glacial till (hardpan) at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. Aldetwood soils formed in glacial deposits under conifers. They occupy upland areas at elevations between 100 and 800 feet. The annual precipitation is 35 to 60 inches, mostly rainfall between October and May. The frost - free season is 150 to 200 days. Typical Profile: Depth from Surface:0 to 27 Inches: Dark brown gravelly sandy loam. May be thinner in depth. 27 to 60 Inches: Grayish brown weakly to strongly consolidated glacial till (hardpan). Penneability: Rapid in surface layer and subsoil above hardpan material. Very slow in the hardpan. Rooting Depth: Roots penetrate easily to the hardpan layer. Roots have difficulty penetrating into the hardpan. Depth to Seasonal High Water Table: 2 to 3 feet Available Water Holding Capacity: Seasonally low (Summer) to seasonally high (Winter) Runoff Potential: Slow to medium. Erosion and Slippage Hazard: Moderate, ranging to severe on steeper slope phases Use and Management: Primary uses are for timber, pasture, berry production, row crops, and urban development. Pasture forage yields are 2.0 tons/acre/year. Low fertility and summer droughtiness are lirniting factors. Douglas -fir, Western Red Cedar, Western Hemlock, Red Alder, and Bigleaf Maple are important tree species on all slope classes. Black Cottonwood can also be an important species on the AgB slope class. Orcas Mapping Symbol: Or The Orcas series consists of very poorly drained organic soils that formed primarily in sphagnum moss in basins on the rolling, undulating glaciated uplands at elevations ranging from 100 to 500 feet. Slopes are 0 to 1%. The annual precipitation is 35 to Winches. The frost -free season is about 160 to 180 days. Typical Profile: Depth from Surface:0 to 60 Inches: Sphagnum peat, dark reddish -brown to yellowish -red Permeability: Very rapid Rooting Depth: 60 inches + Depth to Seasonal High Water Table: 0 to 1 foot Available Water Holding Capacity: High Runoff Potential: Ponded Erosion and Slippage Hazard: None Use and Management: The best use of this soil is for wildlife habitats. It has severe limitations for agricultural use, forestry, engineering, and recreational purposes because of the organic content and high water table. Arents Alderwood Mapping Symbol AmB Arents, Alderwood material, consist of Alderwood soils that have been so disturbed through urbanization that they no longer can be classified with the Alderwod series. Typical Profile: Depth from Surface: 0 to 27 Inches: Brown to dark brown gray ellyr sandy loam. May vary in thickness from 20 to 40 inches. 27 to 60 Inches: Grayish brown to dark brown consolidated and impervious hardpan Permeability: Moderately rapid to moderately slow in surface layer depending upon degree of compaction. Very slow -in the hardpan. Rooting Depth: Roots penetrate easily to the hardpan layer. Roots have difficulty penetrating into the hardpan. Depth to Seasonal High Water Table: 2 to 3'/2feet Available Water Holding Capacity: Low C Runoff Potential: Slow Erosion and Slippage Hazard: Slight Use and Management: These soils have been used for urban purposes. They range in usefulness for recreational and engineering purposes because of their high seasonal water tables and restricted permeabilities caused by compaction. DISCUSSION: Test pits were dug to identify soil characteristics. Test pits reveled the presence of the soils mapped and identified for the site. The presence of Orcas Peat in the wetland areas with color of 5YR 2.5/1 0-8" and 5YR 3/4 9-12" was established. Some areas within the wetland boundary were Alderwood series with color of 10YR 3/2 with3/4 models. Upland test pits revealed a general 10YR 3/1 with no secondary indicators for wetland presence. Oxidized root channels were evident but sometimes faint in all wetland test pits. Wetland hydrology was located in the identified are (Sheet 2). Soils for the identified area did meet wetland sited . Soils immediately adjacent to the identified wetland area are typically Color of 10 YR 3/1 and 3/4 with no mottles or other wetland soil indicators or are consolidated fill / disturbed soil. PLANT SPECIES PRESENT The plant community is limited and fairly consistent throughout the site. Specific dominate plant species found during the site evaluation are as follows: Himalayan Blackberry (Rubus discolor— UPL) EveWeen Blackberry (Rubus 4uiniatua— UPL) Trailing Blackberry (Rebus Uninus — FACU) Buttercup (Ranunculus miens —FACE Reed Cana rygrass (Pbalans arundinacea — FACW) Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea — FACU) Velvet grass (Holcus lanatus - FAQ Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale - ) Bluegrass (Poa pratensis — FACU+) White Clover (Trifolium re ens FACU+) Common Rush 0'uncus effuses FACW+) Pacific Willow (Salix luada — FACW+) The dominate species found in the identified wet area are wetland indicator plants (Reid canary, Rush Willow and Butter Cup). The remaining upland species are 65% to 75% dominated by non wetland indicators. GRC has determined that a wetland does exist at this project site. The historic conditions of the site are altered and some consolidated fill is present around the edge of the wetland and to the NW '/4 of the parcel. Flagging has been placed around the borders of the wetland to delineate the boundary. 7 This wetland as rated by the Washington Wetland Rating System would likely be a Category IV (4) wetland with a WRS score of 20. The score sheets for the wetland rating are provided in Appendix B. Federal Way City Code does not currently reference the WRS system and have there own specified category rating system. Under the City CAO (22-1357) this wetland would likely be a Category III Wetland. Category III Wetlands have a standard 50' setback from the delineated edge. The current buffer to the wetland had been impacted by fill debris and mowed vegetation. This buffer should be restored as part of this development project. SUMMARY GRC has completed a wetland delineation to determine wetland boundaries. The dominant vegetation inside the delineation boundary are wetland indicators. Soils for the wetland have clear indications of saturation, oxidized root channels, stain patterns and wetland hydrology. There appears to be one single classification of wetlands on this site. According to City of Federal Way Critical Areas Ordinance chapter 22, this site would be classified as a Categoq III This wetland would be a regulated wetland due to its size (over 1,000 sq') and would require app mr.-al from the City and possible Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology to alter this wetland or it's tavnimurn buffer setback. GRC recommends a wetland enhancement project be completed to establish native vegetation in the wetland area. The buffer of the wetland should also be planted to increase function. Please note that these determinations are subject to approval by the regulatory authority (City of Federal Way/ Army Corps of Engineers / Department of Ecology) and are intended to be the best possible representation of environmental concerns and wetlands associated with this property. 8 LITERATURE CII`ED Department of the Army. 1987. Cotps of Engigeers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Snyder, D.E, P.S. Gale, R.F. Pringle. 1973. Soil Survey of King County Washington. USDA soil Conservation Service. Kvllmorgen Instruments Corporation. 1990. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgen Instruments Corporation, 2441 North Calvert Street, Baltimore, Maryland. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant S ecies that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest �N�on 9 . U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(26.9). 89pp. Hruby, T, T. Granger, K. Brunner, S. Cook, K. Dublanica, R. Gersib, L. Reinelt, K. Richter, D. Sheldon, E. Teachout, A. Wald, and F. Weinman. July 1999. Methods for Assess' Wetland Functions Volume I: Riverine and De ressional Wetlands in the Law ds of tern tin on. WA State Department Ecology Publication #99-115. City of Federal Way CAO, Chapter 22. 01 28Lh P1 ! :1 �b rn .2951h P14+ S 285th St tt 2th Ln 5a 21t6tht S 2$6th PI 288th St e�x e- 3 288th t S 28991 SL 2 �k� ' I09- Nm I 7 C1 ev- tftca ,T 290th t a� CO V , E } :F: '29 -Q � S 291 st St ta � T 293rd St �``(a Crt w ,b\6 C (a Cadcthf- X a S 291}1m St ' �' 2 th P1 111 _ S 299t+h St 2091h P1 QL r. ? [ S 2199th :St S 301 at > S 300th P1 r� S 302nd FBI 200a F,01 apQuest, 1 C . 02006 NAVTEQ Project Location: 29276 Military Road South Federal Way, Washington GENESIS RESOURCE CONSULTING LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 142 Lamgrecht Road Winiock, WA 98596 GRconsulting@juno.com 360-520-2847 MIDWAY SAMOAN CHURCH WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT SHEET 1 VACINITY MAP : '' 87 _ SOIL TE PIT LOCATIt NS ` `EST PIT LOB ATIDNS" 1 ITS -�E RESEAT H WE ' DATA SHEErI''f ` ' 'n r ti a t •'rr � � 1Sy � * �• i .x ' ;Cl BOOB King County GENESIS RESOURCE CONSULTING LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 142 Lamprecht Road Winlock, NVA 98596 GRconsulting@juno.com 360-520-2847 MIDWAY SAMOAN CHURCH WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT SHEET 2 PARCEL / SOIL TEST PIT LOCATIONS MAP • ii S'. _ .0 `��� Fes. _ •i �' �' l '�. jlF I,, AP ROKIMNO LOCATION ^ BRIS TO BE REMOVE AL? r 1 'S s IF c icl2me icing county STREAM CHANNEL SUBJECT PARCELS GENESIS RESOURCE CONSULTING MIDWAY SAMOAN CHURCH LAND DEVELOPMENT & WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 142 Lamprecht Road Winlock, %VA 96596 SHEET 3 GRconsuldng@uno.com WETLAND LOCATION MAP 360-520-2847 SOILS MAPPED AS ALDERW OD SOILS MAPPED A ORCAS PEAT GRAVELLY ANDY ►. LOAM SOILS MAPPED AS ARENTSI =: aLnERW00D Lq SOILS BOUNDARIES A]PPROXMATE PARCEL BO GENESIS RESOURCE CONSULTING LAND DEVELOPMENT & MIDWAY SAMOAN CHURCH ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS VVTTLAND DELINEATION REPORT 142 L unprechi Road Winlock, WA 98596 GRconsulting@juno.com SHEET 4 360-520-2847 SOILS MAP NWI LAPPET; SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND PARCEL LOCATION GENESIS RESOURCE CONSULTING LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 142 Laxnprechr Road Winlock, WA 98596 GRconsulting@juno.com 360-520-2847 MIDWAY SAMOAN CHURCH WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT SHEET 5 USGS / NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP WETIAND DELINEA.TION REPORT APPENDIX A VEST }SLOT DATA FORIMS GENESIS RESOURCE CONSULTING LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 142 Lftmprecirt Road Winiotk, WA 98596 GRconsulting@jiino.com 360-520-2847 Rouflne ®nsite Determination Project Name: Midway Samoan Church Fieldwork Date: 03/31/06 Site Location: 29276 Military Road South County: Icing State: WA Applicant/Owner: The Nishimura Associates / Midway Samoan Church Invesfigator(s): SB Land Form: Depression _ Plant Community Lapland Plot 1 Location See sheet 2 Do normal conditions exist on site? Yes ® No ❑ Has site been significantly disturbed? Yes ® No ❑ Some areas of historic fill / debris Is this a potential problem site? Yes ❑ No 1legetstion S ies/Indicator Status Stratum % Cover Species/Indicator Status Stratum % Cover Ranunculus r ens — FACIA H 40 Aubus lacdnzatus — UPL V 15 Phalans arundi=4 — FACIA H 20 Festuca arundoasea — FACU- H 10 Holcus lanatus — F AC H 15 % Dominant (4) 75% Is the 1987 Manual hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Soil Mapped Series Orcas Taxonomy On hyddc soil list? Yes ® No ❑ Confirmed map soil type or inclusion: Yes Horizon Depth Matrix Color Redoximorphic Features Texture, Other A 0-12" 10YR 312 3/4 Mottles Organic surface layer/ loam _peat H dric Soil Indicators Yes ® No ❑ ❑ Histosol/Histic Epipedon ® On Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ High Organic Content in Surface for Sandy Soils Concretions/Nodules ❑ ❑ Organic Pan/Streaking in Sandy Soils ElOther within 3 inches Redox. Features within ® ❑ Regional Indicators 10 inches Is the 1987 Manual hydric Soil criterion met? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Hvdrolonv Recorded Data Recorded Data Available: ❑ Aerial Photos: I ❑ I Stream Gau e ❑ Other ❑ Field Data Depth of Inundation: no Depth to Saturation: 9" Depth to Free Water. no Prima H dro[ogy Indicators: Secondary Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Inundated ❑ Drift Lines Oxidized Root Channels ® (upper 12 inches) ❑ FAC- Neutral Test ® Saturated within 12 in. ❑ Sediment Deposits ® Local Soil Survey ❑ Water Marks Wetiand Drainage ❑ Pattern; Swale El Water Stained Leaves El Other: Growin Season: Yes Is the 1987 Manual hydrology criterion met? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Determination Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑ c Remarks: Genesis Resource Consulting 142 Lamprecht Rd Winlock, WA 98596 (360) 520-2847 Routine ®nsite Determination Project Name: Midway Sarnoan Church Fieldwork Date: 03/29/06 Site Location: 29276 Milita Road South County: King State: WA Applicant/Owner: The Nishimura Associates / Midway Samoan Church Investigator(s): SB Land Form: Depression Plant Community Upland Plot 2 Location See sheet 4 Do normal conditions exist on site? Yes ® No ❑ Has site been significantly disturbed? Yes ® No ❑ Some areas of historic fill / debris Is this a potential problem site? Yes ❑ No vegetation Species/Indicator Status Stratum % Cover Soecies/Indicator Status Stratum % Cover Poa pratenjis FACU+ H 30 Festuca arun&xacea — FACU- H 20 Tri oariw repens FACU+ H 30 Taraxasrmv S#Z b ale — FACU H 20 % Dominant M 0% Is the 1987 Manual hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Soil Mapped Series Alderwood SL Taxonomy On hydric soil list? Yes ❑ No M Confirmed map soil type or inclusion: Yes Horizon Depth Matrix Color Redoximorphic Features Texture, Other A 0-12" 10YR3/1 �^ Sandy Loam 1 H dric Soil Indicators Yes ❑ No UJ ❑ Histosol/Histic Epipedon ❑ On Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ High Organic Content in Surface for Sandy Soils ❑ Concretions/Nodules ❑ Organic Pan/Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Other within 3 inches ❑ Redox. Features within ❑ Regional Indicators 10 inches Is the 1987 Manual hydric Soil criterion met?. Yes ❑ No Remarks: Hydrology Recorded Data Recorded Data Available: 101 Aerial Photos: I ❑ Stream Gauge Other ❑ Field Data Depth of Inundation: no Depth to Saturation: no Depth to Free Water: Prima Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Inundated ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Oxidized Root Channels ❑ FAC- Neutral Test (upper 12 inches) ❑ Saturated within 12 in. ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Local Soil Survey ❑ Water Marks Wetland Drainage ❑ Pattern: Swale ❑ Water Stained Leaves ElOther: Growing Season: Yes Is the 1987 Manual hydrology criterion met? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Wetland? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Determination Genesis Resource Consulting 142 Lamprecht Rd Winlock, WA 98596 (360) 520-2847 Routine ®naite Determination Project Name: Midway Samoan Church Fieldwork Date: 03/31/06 Site Location: 29276 Military Road South _ County: Ki_ State: WA Applicant/Owner: The Nishimura Associates / Midway Samoan Church Investigator(s): SB Land Form: Depression Plant Community Upland Plot 3 Location See sheet 2 Do normal conditions exist on site? Yes ® No ❑ Has site been significantly disturbed? Yes ® No ❑ Some areas of historic fill / debris Is this a potenUal problem site? Yes ❑ No Vegetation S iesllndicator Status Stratum °la Cover Spedeslindicator Status Stratum °k Cover Ranunculus re errs — FACiP H 40 Phalaris arundinacea — FACIA H 40 uncusE usus FACIV H 10 rastis aipillajir - FAC H 10 % Dominant (4) 100% Is the 1987 Manual hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Cfini Mapped Series Orcas Taxonomy On hydric soil list? Yes IEJ No ❑ Confirmed map soil type or inclusion: Yes Horizon Depth Matrix Color Redoximarphic Features Texture, Other A 0-8" 5YR 2.511 Red organic B J 8-12" 5YR 314 Hydric Soil Indicators Yes 0--No ❑ ❑ Histosol/Histic Epipedon ® On Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed ® Sulfidic Odor ❑ Reducing Conditions ® High Organic Content in Surface for Sandy Soils ❑ Concretions?Nodules ❑ Organic Pan/Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Other within 3 inches ® Reiox. Features within ❑ Regional Indicators 10 inches Is the 1987 Manual hydric Soil criterion met? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Recorded Data Recorded Data Avallable: ❑ Aerial Photos: ❑ Stream Gauge I ❑ I Other C� Field Data Depth of Inundalion: no De th to Saturation: 8° Depth to Free Water: 10" Prima Hydrology Indicators: Seconds Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Inundated ❑ Drift Lines ® Oxidized Root Channels (upper 12 inches) ❑ FAC- Neutral Test ® Saturated within 12 in. ❑ Sediment Deposits ® Local Soil Survey ❑ Water Marks Wetland Drainage Pattern: Swale ❑ Water Stained Leaves ❑ Other: Gro�vin-q Season: Yes Is the 1987 Manual hydrology criterion met? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Deterrn ination Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Genesis Resource Consulting 142 Lamprecht Rd Winlock, WA 98596 (360) 520-2847 Routine Onsite Determination Project Name: Midway Samoan Church Fieldwork Date: 03/29/06 Site Location: 29276 Military Road South County: bong State: WA Applicant/Owner. The Nishimura Associates / Midway Samoan Church Investigator(s): SB Land Form: Depression Plant Community Upland Plot 4 Location See sheet 4 Do normal conditions exist on site? Yes ® No ❑ Has site been significantly disturbed? Yes ® No ❑ Some areas of historic fill / debris Is this a potentia! problern site? Yes ❑ No Poa prafens —FACU+ H 30 Aubus Ursinus — non indicator V 10 Festuca arundinacea — FACT - H 20 Rrbnr kniniahl; — UPL V 10 T ' efirrvx repens FACU+ H 10 Taraxanwn of d1lak-- FACU H 20 % Dominant (4) 0% Is the 1987 Manual hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ❑ No ID Remarks: aou Mapped Series Alderwood SL Taxonomy On hydric soil list? Yes ❑ No ® Confirmed map soil type or inclusion: Yes Horizon Depth Matrix Color Redoximorphic Features Texture, Other A 0-12" 10YR3/1 Sandy Loam H dric Soil Indicators Yes ❑ No ❑ Histosol/Histic Epipedon ❑ On Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ High Organic Content in Surface for Sandy ❑ Sulfidic Odor Soils ❑ ConcretionsINodules ❑ Organic Pan/Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Other within 3 inches ❑ Redox. Features within ❑ Regional Indicators 10 inches Is the 1987 Manual hydric Soil criterion met? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Recorded Data Recorded Data Available: ❑ Aerial Photos: ® Stream Gau e ❑ Other ❑ Field Data Depth of Inundation: no Depth to Saturation: no Depth to Free Water: Primary Hydrology indicators: Secondary Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Inundated El Drift Lines Oxidized Root Channels FAC- Neutral Test ElOxidized 12 inches) ❑ Saturated within 12 in. ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Local Soil Survey ❑ Water Marks ❑ Wetland Drainage ❑ Water Stained Leaves ❑ Other: Yes Growing Sees t'atlern &Vale -on: Is the 1987 Manual hydrology criterion met? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Wetland? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Determination Genesis Resource Consulting 142 Lamprecht Rd Winlock, WA 98596 (360) 520-2847 WETLAND DELINEATION REPOLF I' APPENDIX B WASHING'T'ON STATE WETLAND RAVING SYSTEM WETLAND RATING FORM GENESIS RESOURCE CONSULTING LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1.12 Lunpreciir Road Winlock, NVA 98596 GRconsulting@juno.com 360-520-2847 We-dand Rating Form Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington Rating Summary Wetland Name or Designation Location (S,T,R) Completed by Affiliation Date of site visit Rating Based on Functions Water Quality Function Score Hydrologic Function Score Habitat Function Score Tata 0 Rating based on SQcclal Characteristics Final Rating Midway Samoan Chruch Genesis Resource Consulting 3/16/2006 Category IV 5 7 8 2® #N/A Category IV Special Wetland Type - #N/A HGM Class #N/A Rating Form Gass #N/A Considerations for Special Protection I y/n Has the wetland been documented as habitat for any Federally listed Threathened or n Endangered species? Has the wetland been documented as habitat for any State listed Threathened or n Endangered species? Are Priority Species listed by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife present? In Is the wetland designated as a "Wetland of Local Significance" by the local jurisdication? in Summary 3/23/2006 page 1 Wetland hating Form Western Washington De ressional and Flats Wetlands Water Quality functions D1. Does the wet and have the potential to improve water quality? see p.38 1.1 Characteristics of surface wafer flows out of the wetland: Wetland is a depression with no surface water outlet 3 0 Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet 2 0 Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet 1 Y_ 1 Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and/or outlet is a ditch 1 0 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the su ace Is clay, organic, or smells anoxic ydrogen n 0 sulfide or rotten eggs). 4 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest class): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 95% of area 5 0 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetations = 1/2 of area 3 -_- 0 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation> = 1/10 of area 1 0 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <11 10 of area 0 Y 0 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. This is the area of the wetland that Is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is> 1/2 total area of wetland 4 0 Area seasonally ponded is> 1/4 total area of wetland points = 2 2 n 0 Area seasonally ponded is < total area of we an —points = 0 Y 0 TOTAL (SUM) 1 D2e Does the we#land have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see pv 44) Answer YES it you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources o pollutants Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft. Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland _ Y Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft. of wetland A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains deve aped areas, residential areas, n farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft. of wetland Y Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen Other (mote) Multiplier 2 TOTAL for Water Quality Functions A 2 Depressional 3/23/2006 page 1 Weiland Gating Form Western Washington De ressional and Flats Wetlands Hydrologic Functions D3. Does the wetland have the potential to reduce R56ding an erosion? see p.46 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Wetland is a depression with no surface water outlet 4 _ 0 Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet 2 0 Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet 1 Y 1 Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and/or outlet is a ditch 0 0 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods: B mate the height of ponding above the hattom of the outlet. Marks of ponding are 3 ft. or more above the surface 7 0 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland 5 _ _ 0 Marks of ponding between 2 ft. to < 3ft. From surface 5 0 Marks are at least 0.5 ft. to < 2 ft. from surface 3 0 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water 1 _ 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft. 0 0 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed: F_siimate the ratio of the area of the upstream sin cnntribub'ng su►iace water to the we and to the area of the wetland itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the wetland 5 0 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the wetland 3 0 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the wetland 0 y 0 Wetland is n e c ass in = ewe an y mt+on 5 0 TOTAL {SUM} 2 D4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to to reduce fioo ing and erosion? see p.4g Answer YES it tl7e wetland /s in a ocatIon m the Watershed where Tovd storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream properly and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows Answer NO if the water coating into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as a floodgate, We game, flap valve, reservoir, etc. OR you estimate that more than 905yo of the water in the wetland is from groundwater. Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems Wetland drains ro a river of stream that has flooding problems Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, Y residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging Other {Note} Multiplier 2 TOTAL for (Hydrologic Functions 4 Depr essional 3/23/2006 page 2 Wet9and [dating Form Western wasttington All Wetlands H 1. Does the %yetiand have Habitat Functions potential to provWe habitat for ma 1.1 Vegetation structure see p. 72 : — Note all plant communities (Cowardin) that cover more than 10961 of the wetland or 1141 acre A uatic bed 1 n Emergent plants 1 Y Scrub/Shrub (more than 30% shrub cover) 1 n Forested more than 30% tree cover 1 n Forested ares with at least 3 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrub, herb/forb, moss/groundcover) 1 1.2 Hydroperlad ISee P. 73 Note the types of water regimes(hydropenods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 1096 of the wetland or 1141 acre to count (refer to text for descriptions of water re imes Permanently flooded or inundated 1 n Seasonal! flooded or inundated 1 n Occaional!y flooded or inundated 1 Y Saturated only 1 Permanently flowing stream or river in orad acent to the wetland 1 Seasonally flowing stream or river in, oradjacent to, the wetland 1 _ Lafe-fringe wetland 2 Freshwater tidal wetland 2 1.3 Richenss of Plant Species see p. 75 : Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 sq. ft. Differenent atches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold. Do not indude eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loostrife, or Canadian thistle. > 19 s ies 5 -5 19 species < 5 species 1.4 Interspersion of habitats (see p. 76): Use the diagrams below to determine interspersion between vegetation types, or vegetation Op es and unve etatroed areas fmay inrlude open water or mud(Jats . None Low Moderate High NOTE: If there are 4 or more vegetaion type_ s or 3 vegetation types and openwater the score will be "High". 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 _ L--091 y0 - — 0 0 1 0 2 y 2 3 0 HablUt 3/23/2006 page 1 Watiand Malting Fore Western Washington All Wetlands Habitat Functions 1.3 Sp eclap habitat features (see p. 77)0 Note all the habitat features that are pmsent in the wetland. Large, dawned woody debris > 4 in. diameter and at least 6 ft. Ion 1 n 0 Standing snags diameter at the base > 4 in. 1 n 0 Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6. ft. (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft. 1m) over a stream for at [east 33 ft. 10m Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 de . Slope)OR signs of recent beaver activityare rennet. _ 1 n 0 1 n� 0 At least 1/4 acre of thin stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branched are present in ibian e areas that are permenantly or seasonally inundated (structures for amphgj- yinq) 1 n 0 Invasive eants covet' less than 25% of the area in each stratum 1 n 0 TOTAL (SUM) 4 H2o Does the ,&etiand have the opportunity to provide habitat for many s eces? 2.1 Buffers (see p. E0)o Choose the description that best represents the condition of the wetland buffer. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. Refer to the text for the definition of 'undisturbed': 100 m (330 ft.) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 95% of circumference. No developed areas within undisturbed part of the buffer (also no grazing). 100 m (330 ft.) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% of circumference. 50 m (170 ft.) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 95% of circumference. 5 4 4 3 - 3 _ — 0 0 0 100 m (330 ft.) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% of circumference. 0 50 m (170 ft.) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% of circumference. 0 if the buffer does not meet any of the criteria above No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft.) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns OK. 2 _ 0 No paved areas or buildings within 25 m (80ft.) of wetland > 50% circumference. Light to moderate graging or lawns OK. Heavy grazingin buffer Vegetated buffers are < 2m (6.6 ft.) wide for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields paving, basalt bedrock to the ed a of wetland). Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. 2 1 0 _ 1 _ 0 0 0 1 Habitat 3/23/2006 page 2 'Wf vdand Rating Form Western Washington All Wetlands Habitat Functions 2.2 Corridors and connections (see P. 81). Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft. wide, has at lest 30% cover of shrubs, forest, or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands, or undisturbed uplands that are 4 n 0 at least 250 acres in size (dams in riparian corridors and heavilty used gravel roads are considered breaks inthe corridor)? Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft. wide, has at lest 30% cover of shrubs, forest, or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands, or undisturbed uplands that are 2 n 0 at least 25 acres in size OR a lafe-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? Is the wetland: within 5 mi. (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi. of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi. of a lake of a qreater than 20 acres? 1 1 1 n 0 n 0 Y 1 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW Note all PHs bWs that are w1thin 330 ft, 100m of the mtiand. Riparian Aspen Stands 1 1 0 0 Cliffs 1 0 Old Growth Forest 1 0 Mature Forest 1 0 Prairies 1 0 Talus Slopqs 1 0 Caves 1 _ 0 Oregon White Oak Woodlands 1 0 Urban Natural Open Space Estua Estura -like Marine/Estuarine Shorelines _ 1 0 1 0 1 0 SCORE 0 2.4 Wetland (Landscape (see p. 84) Choose the desaiptfon below that best fits There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mi. and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing , lakeshore wiuth some baoting OK, but connections should 5 0 NOT be bisected Dy paved roads fill fields or other development). The wetland is a lake -fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake -fringe wetlands within 1/2 mi. There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mi. a, BUT the connections between them are disturbed. The wetland is a lake -fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake -fringe wetlands within 112 mi. There is at least 1 wetland within 1/2 mi. 5 — - y 0 3 3 3 _. 0 2� 0 0 0 _ There are no wetlands within 12 mi. Toy ri_ (0M) 14 $ TOTALfor (Habitat Functions Habiiat 3/23/2006 page 3 CITY OF Fe d e ra I Ala This CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION is made this 12 day of .June PUB VORKsDEPARTMENT 33325 8`h Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-2700;Fax 253-835-2709 'IV W%V.ci[ otfcdcraI%yay.cotn 2007, by the City of Federal Way (COFW), a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter called the "City"). Whereas, the developer intends to develop the property described as reviewed under City file CN Number (s) 07-101 139-C'N .%,hd\ av Samoan Church (hereinafter called the "development"); and Whereas, RCW 36.70A requires that the City adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on a transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of the development are made concurrent with the development; and Whereas, the City adopted its comprehensive plan in November 1995 ; and Whereas, Chapter 19 of the COFW Municipal Code was amended by the creation of Article IV on June 10, 2006 by Ordinance 06-525 effective January 1, 2007; and NOW, THEREFORE, a concurrency certificate is issued for the development of Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church based on the facts and conditions set forth herein. Development Parameters This CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION is based on the following development: Development type: Development size: Property address: Parcel No. (s): Number of New PM Peak Hour Vehicles Trips Generated: Validity of Concurrency Determination Church 4800 So Ft 29276 Military Road South Federal Way WA 0421049063 & 042104932 This CAPACITY RESERVE CERTIFICATE is valid only for the specific development approval consistent with the development parameters and the City file number contained within this certificate. If the development is changed it will be subject to reevaluation for concurrency purposes. Terms of the Capacity Reserve Certificate This CAPACITY RESERVE CERTIFICATE is valid until the City issues a final decision on the underlying permit or approval. Approved by 'a Date: 1-3 Z L:\D EPT\P W\TRA\Concurrency\07101 139_M idway_Samoan_Ch urch\CRC.doc CITY OF ML AORANDUM Federal Way + Public Works Department U ✓ Q, DATE: March 1, 2006 I TO: Jim Harris VX FROM: Sarady Long SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH - (06-100629-00-SE) 2.9276 MILTfARY RD S Traffic Division has finished reviewing the submitted materials and the following comments must be addressed. 1. Based on the Environmental Checklist, the project consisted of a 2,400 sq. ft. steel fabricated building for assembly and worship. The project is not expected to generate more than 10 Peak Hour trips. As such a TIA is not required. 2. The submitted Traffic Study by Transportation Planning & Engineering is not valid for this project. The study is outdated and the scope of the project is not consistent with the proposed project. This study should not be included as it's not relevant to this project. 3. Street improvements on Military Road shall meet Type K street, consisting of a 44'street with vertical curb, 6' planter strip with trees, 8' sidewalk and streetlight. However, since the project is not expected to generate significant trips, the applicant may submit a modification request to waive the required street improvement. The director of Public Works will make his/her decisions on a case -by - case basis. 4. The proposed driveway must meet the required 150'spacing requirement and shall meet the current AASHTO intersection sight distance standards. L:\CSDC\DOCS\SAVE\8154495014. DOC to 0.00 0.00 0 o 0 0.00 0.04 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.00 oQ °j Q o CD 0 4 02 o "l2 0 0 40 Q n Im 0 0 00 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.01 O O N 0 00 0 0.01 0.00 0.07 _ 0 0 o � o 0 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 do 0.00 0.00 0.00 O' 0.01 0.01 oA�� 0.00 o� 0.01 O O O O O O O 1 p 0.01 0.02 0 0 00 0 0 115 o o ao 0.10 o 0.15 0.14 0.15 o � 0.19 0.13 .13 0.11 0.11 0.08 o o 0o o0.09 0 o o 0 0 0 a _ 4' T 0 o 0 0. o -�s o 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 � 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 a o 0 0 0 o 0 00 -jo O d� 0 0 p0 a 0 0.03 0.01 O O v 0.01 o 0.02 0.00 0 0 0 0.01 coN a MEMORANDUM Public Works Department TO: David Lee FROM: Ann Dower U 'o SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) - (07-101136-00-UP) 29276 MILITARY RD S; Public Works comments The information provided on May 13, 2009 has been reviewed. The applicant will need to address the following items: 1. King County Assessor's information shows that the property on which the storm water outfall is shown is not owned by the Midway Samoan Church. A public hearing and Hearing Examiner approval will be required to run pipe through the stream buffer and discharge directly to the stream. An easement or proof of ownership must be provided prior to the public hearing. 2. One of the conditions for a peak flow exemption is the use of BMP's to disperse or infiltrate water. Please include BMP's for the runoff from the roof and parking area. The bioswale is a treatment method, but is not considered a flow control BMP. The tightline and rock outfall provide neither treatment nor flow control, and creates a point discharge that is discouraged. 4k o. Fed'0';:tS;P eral Way DATE: 10/10/08 MEMORANDUM Public Works Department TO: David Lee FROM: Ann Dower SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) - (07-101136-00-UP) 29276 MILITARY RD S; Development Services Review The Development Services Department has reviewed the information provided on August 1, 2008. Please provide the following revisions: 1. The applicant did not provide an easement as requested for the sanitary sewer connection to the existing manhole. The easement must be in place prior to approval of the engineering plans. 2. The outfall for the storm system is shown on the neighboring property and within the 100-foot stream buffer. In this location, the applicant will need Hearing Examiner approval of the outfall and a recorded easement prior to approval of the engineering plans. The effect on downstream flooding problems will be factored into any decision. TIR 3. The TIR has conflicting information regarding the outfall, stating that it will be dispersed (p. 9) and that it can't be dispersed (p.41). In discussing this threshold with Steve Foley of King County, he pointed out that the 0.5 cfs threshold applies at the property line. Dispersion can be allowed with a 100'vegetated flow path between the dispersion trench and the property line. See figure 4.2.2.0 for design details. At least 100 feet of vegetated flow path (preferably more) is also favored by staff to reduce and/or eliminate any downstream impact. 4. The existing gravel area must be modeled as 50% impervious, not 100% impervious, per Table 3.2.2.E in the 1998 KCSWDM (6,690 rather than 13,380 square feet). Plans 5. Please clarify on the plans how the roof runoff will be controlled and make sure that it does not impair the function of the bioswale. The TIR shows the bioswale in a location that could work with splash blocks or dispersion for the roof runoff. The plans show the bioswale in a location that will intercept runoff from the roof if splashblocks are used. CITY OF v- Federal Way DATE: March 20, 2008 TO: David Lee FROM: Sean Wells, P.E. MEMORANDUM Public Works Department SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (2007) - (07-101136-00-UP) 29276 MILITARY RD S - PWDS Technical Comments #1 We have reviewed the preliminary analysis and plans for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church date stamped resubmitted January 22, 2008, and found items that need to be addressed prior to receiving preliminary approval from Development Services. These items are in accordance with Chapters 21 and 22 of the Federal Way City Code and the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and are as follows: Preliminary Engineering Plans CIVIL DRAWINGS). 1. Show the location of the 9 foot right of way dedication and the 11 foot Tract X (per the right-of-way modification). Show the required setbacks from the back of the Tract X. 2. Show the proposed grading plan more accurately. Several contour lines are missing, and it would appear that there will be approximately 5 feet of fill in areas. If retaining structures will be required, they must be shown preliminarily at this time. 3. Show the length of the dispersal trench. Coordinate this with the preliminary design in the TIR. 4. Show the apparent required easement to connect the side sewer service to the sewer manhole off the south east property corner. 5. Show the location of the ADA required curb ramps to the sidewalk. Preliminary/Final Technical Information Report Use page numbers throughout the report. Preliminary Bioswale Design: a. Provide a facility design and sketch with the design calculations. b. Provide a water quality basin map showing the area that will be draining to the proposed bioswale. c. Note that the slope of 1% requires underdrains. d. Finish the calculations of steps 3 through 6 (KCSWDM 6.3.1.1) e. Provide a preliminary design for the flow dispersal trench. CITY OF G Y � 335301 ST WAY SOUTH DATE: October 23, 2002 TO: David Graves FROM: Kim Scattarella MEMORANDUM Public Works Department SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH - (02-104465-00-PC) 29276 MILITARY RD S After reviewing the materials submitted and a visit of the proposed site the following comments and findings address issues that need to be resolved prior to developing this site: Land Use Review 1. If future construction on this proposed site creates 5, 000 S.F. or more of new impervious surface, surface water flow control will -be required, utilizing the Level 1 flow control standards. The project lies within a level 1 flow control area, thus the applicant must design the flow control facility to meet this performance criteria. Provide documentation that verifies the amount of additional impervious surface, which must include any frontage improvements on Military Road South. 2. In accordance with section 22-337 of the FWCC, all non -conforming site issues must be brought into compliance with current standards, if the thresholds are met. This proposed development exceeds the valuation threshold of 50% of the assessed or appraised value of the existing structures and will require a standard retrofit of the entire site for water quality per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Retrofitted water quality treatment shall be from the Basic Water Quality menu, per the 1998 KCSWDM. Storm water discharge that enters the wetland buffer shall be a non - point discharge utilizing a level flow spreader or equivalent. 3. A preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) is required, with a narrative addressing the relevance to the project of the 8 core and the 5 special requirements of the KCSWDM will be required at the time of the site plan review submittal. A Level I downstream analysis shall also be provided. The city has available 1 =100 , 5 foot contour, planimetric maps that must be used for basin analysis. Contact the Ayad Shuaib, City of Federal Way, Surface Water Management Department for further details. 4. For site plan review submittal, if flow control is required, conceptual drainage facilities need to be shown on the plan to a size and configuration approximating the needs of the site. Traffic/R-O-W Improvements See attached Traffic Division memorandum from Sarady Long, Traffic Engineer, for traffic related items. Building Permit Review 1. If surface water runoff flow control is required, final Technical Information Report(s) (TIR(s)) must be submitted with the building permit application. A TIR must also include the signature/seal of a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Washington. 2. Copies of the Public Works standard checklists are available upon request to assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and a TIR. 3. Bonding will be required for all improvements associated with the project. The bond amount shall be 120% of the estimated cost of the improvements. Upon completion of the installation and final approval by the Public Works inspector, the bond value will be reduced to 30% of the original amount for the two-year maintenance period. An administrative fee deposit will need to accompany the bond to cover any possible legal fees in the event the bond must be called. 4. The developer will be responsible for the maintenance of the streets and storm drainage system for a two-year maintenance period. During that time the Public Works inspector will make periodic visits to assure developer's compliance with maintenance requirements. When the two- year maintenance period is completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works inspector, the bond will be released. City inspection of any new facilities will continue on an annual basis. 5. When topographic survey information is shown on submitted plans, the vertical datum block shall include the phrase "DATUM: N.G.V.D.-29" or DATUM: K.C.A.S." on all sheets where elevations are called out. 6. Site plans shall be drawn at a scale of 1"=20' or larger. Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24"x36" paper. Final, approved drawings shall be drafted/plotted on 24" x 36" mylar sheets with permanent black ink 7. Provide cut and fill quantities on the grading plan. Erosion control measures, per Appendix D, 1998 KCSWDM must be shown in the plans. 8. The plans for onsite and frontage improvements should show the location of any existing and proposed utilities in the areas affected by construction. CITY OF -� Federal Way DATE: March 15, 2006 TO: Jim Harris FROM: Sean Wells, P.E. MEMORANDUM Public Works Department SUBJECT: MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH - (06-100628-00-UP) 29276 MILITARY RD S - Technical Comments We have reviewed the preliminary analysis and plans for the Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church, date stamped received February 9, 2006, and found items that need to be addressed prior to receiving preliminary approval from Development Services. These items are in accordance with Chapters 21 and 22 of the Federal Way City Code and are as follows: Preliminary Engineering_ Plans: 1. The site plan shall show the following information: a. Vicinity map b. Area of site c. ' Existing abutting streets, including width of right-of-way d. Clearly define the property lines. 2. Show the required right-of-way improvements to Military Road South, or provide a letter requesting a Right -of -Way Modification 3. Per the Public Works comments for the Pre -application meeting, dated October 23, 2002, this site is in a Level 1 flow control area. The applicant has claimed an exemption to requiring a flow control facility through the peak flow threshold of 0.1 cfs. However, this analysis fails to account for any off - site improvements that may be required (i.e.: Frontage Improvements). 4. The proposed water quality filter strip shall not be located within the wetland buffer. 5. Continuous vertical curbing is required around the parking lot perimeter. However, in the area next to the filter strip, wheel stops are required at the head -end of the parking stalls to prevent the drivers from entering and driving over the water quality facility. The breaks in the wheel stops will allow for a reasonable sheet flow into the filter strip flow spreader. 6. The proposed sewer service connection to the east appears to be offsite. Proof of legal right to cross private property (easement) shall be submitted prior to construction plan approval. Preliminary Technical Information Report 1. A few pages appear to be missing, and several appear to be out of numerical order. Please submit a report with all of the pages, in order, and with the corrections listed in the following comments. 2. Page 3 — Core Requirement #3. This section stats that the existing 100-year flow is 0.149 cfs, but the KCRTS printout shows 0.154 cfs. 3. The trench length calculated on page 3 (near the bottom) shows a length of 70 feet, however, the site plan shows only approximately 30 feet. The exception on Page 4 states that the trench length will be 32 feet long, 4. The downstream analysis determined a downstream severe flooding problem located within 1/4 mile of the site. The applicant has claimed that the site qualifies for an exemption from Core Requirement #3. However, due to the fact that the report fails to address any additional runoff from the required road improvements to Military Road, the site would most likely not qualify for the exemption. Therefore, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of "Problem Specific Mitigation Requirements" located on Page 1-23 of the KCSWDM. 5. Provide a copy of Figure 3.2.2.A in the report, and identify the site location, so that staff may verify how the variable ST=1.0 was determined. 6. Provide pre and post development basin maps, and tables showing the areas for land use and ground types. 7. Please show/explain h_vv it is determined that 0.154 cfs is the 100 y(--.., peak flow, and not any other storm event peak flow. S. Because the project is not proposing any on -site detention, nor is there a regional detention facility downstream of this site, the water quality design flow shall be determined to be the full 2-year storm event, not 60% of the 2-year event. el l TICOR TITLE COMPANY !(3//3 (- U 600 SW 39th Street, #100, Renton, WA 98055 (425)255-7575 FAX (425)255-0285 Date: February 9, 2007 at 08:00 AM Prepared For: Midway Assembley of God 29276 South Military Road INQUIRIES SHOULD BE MADE TO: UNIT 1 (425)255-7472 Donna Roetter Arlene Naputi Order No.: Your Reference: Charge: Tax: SECOND REPORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A TITLE IS VESTED IN: Midway Samoan Assembley of God, a religious, non-profit corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: 6359553-1 Midway Assembley of God/ $ 330.00 $ 29.04 Beginning at a point on the west line of the northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, south 535 feet north of the southwest corner thereof; thence north 220 feet; thence east parallel with the south line of said quarter section 1145.13 feet to the easterly arm of drainage ditch; ❑thence southwesterly along said drainage ditch to a point east of the point of beginning and 1034.05 feet distan therefrom; thence west parallel with the south line of said quarter section 1034.05 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT county road passing through said property; AND EXCEPT that portion lying westerly of Military Road. Parcel B: That portion of the southwest quarter of Section 4, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the easterly margin of Military Road as conveyed to King County by Deeds recorded under Auditor's File Numbers 3022385, 3029951 and 4819792, records of said county, with the northwesterly margin of the drainage ditch, said point called Point A; thence northwesterly along the easterly margin of Military Road 248 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue northwesterly along said easterly margin to the north line of the south 535 feet of said southwest quarter; thence easterly along said north line to the northwesterly margin of said drainage ditch; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly margin to a point which is 320 feet northeasterly of Point A; thence southwesterly to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING PLAT Certificate Schedule A Policy No. 6359553-1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE A CONTINUED The land referred to herein is described as follows: Parcel A: Beginning at a point on the west line of the northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, south 535 feet north of the southwest corner thereof; thence north 220 feet; thence east parallel with the south line of said quarter section 1145.13 feet to the easterly arm of drainage ditch; thence southwesterly along said drainage ditch to a point east of the point of beginning and 1034.05 feet distant therefrom; thence west parallel with the south line of said quarter section 1034.05 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT county road passing through said property; AND EXCEPT that portion lying westerly of Military Road. Parcel B: That portion of the southwest quarter of Section 4, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the easterly margin of Military Road as conveyed to King County by Deeds recorded under Auditor's File Numbers 3022385, 3029951 and 4819792, records of said county, with the northwesterly margin of the drainage ditch, said point called Point A; ❑thence northwesterly along the easterly margin of Military Road 248 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue northwesterly along said easterly margin to the north line of the south 535 feet of said southwest quarter; thence easterly along said north line to the northwesterly margin of said drainage ditch; ❑thence southwesterly along said northwesterly margin to a point which is 320 feet northeasterly of Point A; thence southwesterly to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS: 1. EASEMENT FOR GRADING OF STREET SLOPES, AS NECESSARY, OVER PORTION OF PREMISES ADJOINING STREET OR ALLEY AS GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: December 2, 1938, January 30, 1939 and July 30, 1957 RECORDING NUMBER: 3022385, 3029951 and 4819792 2. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon said property and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term of lease. 3. NOTICE OF SEWER AND/OR WATER CONNECTION CHARGE: GIVEN BY: King County Water District Number 124 RECORDED: June 1, 1981 RECORDING NUMBER: 8106010916 4. Matters disclosed by Survey recorded under Recording Number 9806169002. 5. DELINQUENT GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: DELINQUENT YEAR: 2006 AMOUNT BILLED: $87.13 AMOUNT PAID: $0.00 AMOUNT DUE: $87.13 PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTIES TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 042104-9063-02 LEVY CODE: 1207 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: LAND: $0.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $0.00 AFFECTS: Parcel A. 6. General property taxes and special district charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent an May 1st; 2nd half delinquent on November 1st) Total Taxes for Year 20007 Amount Billed: $94.95 Amount Paid: $0.00 Amount Due: $94.95 Tax Account Number: 042104-9063-02 Levy Code: 1207 Current Assessed Value: Land: $0.00 Improvements: $0.00 AFFECTS: Parcel A. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as partially exempt. If said taxes are not paid prior to the forthcoming sale or death of the currant taxpayer, the exemption will be disallowed and the full amount for current and/or prior year, if any, will be due. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 042104-9063-02 AFFECTS: Parcel A. 8. DELINQUENT GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: DELINQUENT YEAR: 2006 AMOUNT BILLED: $777.06 AMOUNT PAID: $0.00 SCHEDULE B (Continued) AMOUNT DUE: $777.06 PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTIES TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 042104-9032-00 LEVY CODE: 1207 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: LAND: $53,300.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $5,000.00 AFFECTS: Parcel B. 9. General property taxes and special district charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1 st half delinquent on May 1 st; 2nd half delinquent on November 1 st) Total Taxes for Year 2007 Amount Billed: $752.62 Amount Paid: $0.00 Amount Due: $752.62 Tax Account Number: 042104-9032-00 Levy Code: 1207 Current Assessed Value: Land: $53,300.00 Improvements: $5,000.00 AFFECTS: Parcel B. NOTES: A. In the event the transaction fails to close and this commitment is cancelled, a fee will be charged to comply with the State Insurance Code and the filed schedule of this Company. B. Abbreviated Legal for purposes of King County Recorders Office is: Ptn. NE 1/4, Sec. 4, Twnshp 21 N, Range 4E, W.M. . C. 24 MONTH OWNERSHIP SEARCH: The vesting deed into vestees herein was recorded on January 5, 1998, recorded under Recording Number 9801050722. D. We find no adverse matters affecting the name(s) of Midway Samoan Assembly of God, in the King County records. cc: Nishimura Associates Midway Assembley of God df/sl/09/30/2005 /an/02/15/2007 PLAT Certificate Schedule B � w W Z Z cr- z m a�� = C ~ a 3 LL �I O Z o z z U LU O Lcn CU W it �I y ro .ou � 3�0�����a�\ � odd ,�`��� ��� ����� � 0 �� � u� •� � 1A NI Nw . h ' .. a ... Aa' �. r• r, 1: � O T - o ° 0 ° e•' S via � � _ a4v 'xao nose's. W i h PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE REPORT (including Downstream Analysis in Appendix) MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH Location: 29276 Military Road South Federal Way, WA 98003 a.k.a. City File No. 07-101136-00-UP January 21, 2008 By Sound Consultants, LLC Seattle, Washington 98136 SC Job No. 2006023 0 7-101136 'RESUBMITTED JAN 2 2 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL. WAY BUILDING DEPT. SOUND a ti t' V CONSULTANTS, KIRKLAND OFFICE SEAT ME OFFICE 10509 NE 121f Place 6484 — 4e Avenue SW Kirkland, WA 98034 Seattle. WA 98136 425-765-5053 Ph. 206-938-6168 Ph_ 425-823-5313 Fax 206-930-7645 Fax e-mail; J."verizon.net a -mail; H.Hagenson@wrricaswom January 8, 2007 City of Federal Way DCDS 33325e Ave South P.O Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Re: Midway Samoan Assembly of God Church File No. 06-100629-00SE & 06-100628-UP Mr. Shawn Wells, P.E. We are writing to request a modification to the Right of Way improvements required as part of the Process IV Conditional Use Permit application for the subject project. We ask that the proposed project be exempt from providing any Right of Way improvements to Military Road South. The basis of our request is as follows: 1. The ROW improvements would likety push the project over the stormwater flow control exemption threshold, thereby forcing the project to install a storm detention system and impose a difficult financial burden on this small project 2. The proposed project will not generate significant AMiPM Peak hour trips which might otherwise trigger improvements. Large meetings are generally restricted to weekends and off-peak hours. 3. It is our understanding that the proponent would be willing to sign a no protest agreement to any future transportation Local Improvement District for the ultimate improvements to Military Road South. Thank you for you consideration in this matter Sincerely, c, Hal Hagenson, P.E. Associate TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Core and Special Requirements Analysis B. Technical Information Report I. Project Overview H. Preliminary Conditions Summary III. Off -site Analysis (Appendix) IV. Proposed Drainage Improvements V. Conveyance Systems Analysis and Design VI. Basin and Community Planning Areas VII. Other Permits VIII. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Design IX. Bond Quantities Work Sheet, Retention/Detention Facility, Summary Sheet and Sketch, and Declaration of Covenant X. Maintenance and Operation Manual Appendix -Level One Downstream Analysis (NIC-Exempt) -Geotechnical Study (pending) A. CORE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS This section of the TIR is intended to meet agency specific requirements for a report addressing all Core and Special Requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual. Core Requirement 1__Discharge at the Natural Location The discharge location from the existing and developed site is identical. Currently, the site slopes are about 3% to the east, draining to the on -site wetland and then to the local classified stream lying near the east property line. This stream flows generally North Easterly and eventually discharges into the I-5 ROW. Core Requirement 2. Offsite Analysis The following discussion is presented to inform clients, owners, interested public citizens and,�� others regarding the decision process involved in the drainage design. Per KCSWM 1.2.2 ft 1-2!),all projects must submit an offsite analysis report that assesses potential impacts. Exemptions are - — - - -- - -- - - - - - - - 1. DD S determines there is sufficient information for them to conclude that the project will r rr t r S �o�s not have a significant adverse impact, or 2. The project adds less than 2,000 SF of new impervious surface and less than 35,000 SF of new pervious surface, and does not construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size or that receives runoff from a pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size and does not contain or lie adjacent to a landslide, steep slope, or erosion hazard area or 3. The project does not change the rate, volume duration or location of discharges from the site. The project does not meet the exem tiara requirements above.erefore, an offsite analysis is included. The off -site analysis was prepared by Larry Steward, P.E. prior. It identifies flooding in the downstream area, at the Camelot Square Mobile Home Park, where drainage over -tops a "short drive way sag curve". Core Requirement 3: Flow Control Per King County 1998 SWM Flow Control Applications Map,the site lies in a Basic (level 1) flow control area. Section 1.2.3 of the KCSWM (pg 1-27) requires flow control for all project including redevelopment projects. For the basicflow low control areas, Pg 1-31 requires matching the developed peaks to existing peak flows for the 2 and 10 year return periods. However, the project is eligible for a flow control exception. The project scope consists of replacing an existing church and concrete pad with a new church and new paved parking lot surfaces. i Photos from 1979 or prior (1972) verify that the current impervious surfaces are equal to or less than the impervious surfaces from the 1972 photo. The facility parking lot actually appears slightly larger in the 1972 photo compared with the current condition, and all of the existing buildings are shown. Conservatively, we have used the existing survey to prepare impervious/pervious area statistics. From these statistics, it can be seen that the net increase in new impervious area is zero. Using the KCRTS modeling criteria for 1-hour events the increase in flows due to the development would be 0.00 cfs. Exemption number 3 (pg 1-27) states: "Any threshold discharge area within a proposed project is exempt if the project improvements with the threshold discharge area generate less than a 0.1 cfs increase in the existing site conditions (conditions prior to 1979 or permitted after 1979) 100-year peak flow rate, AND all of the following criteria are met: a) The project is a redevelopment project, flow control BMPs must be applied as specified in Section 5.2 and the project improvements must not significant impact a "severe erosion problem or "severe flooding problem" (see page 1-ol) and must not be located within a Landslide Hazard Drainage Area, AND b) If the project is a single family residential project, the runoff from impervious surfaces must be infiltrated or dispersed using the flow control BMPs specified, in Appendix C, and any areas of native vegetation assumed not to be cleared for the purposes of computing the increase in 100-year peak flow must be preserved within a tract or by covenant as described in Appendix C, AND c) For project other than redevelopment projects and single family residential projects, the new impervious surface within the threshold discharge area must be comprised of either non -pollution -generating roofs that comply with the roof downspout control in Section 5.1 or Roads, trails, or driveways that comply with the rural roadway dispersion requirements in Section 5.2.1 AND d) The manner in which runoff is discharged from the project site must not create a significant adverse impact per Core Requirement #1. The project is a re -development project, proposing to disperse runoff with a dispersal trench per Appendix C. There is a "severe" drainage problem (defined on Page 1-21 as "flooding over all lanes of a roadway or severely impac g a sole access veway for runoff events less than or equal to the 100-year event"). However, per Section 1.2.2.2 Impact Mitigation, on page 1-23, item 1.b), the previous discussion shows that the "natural or threshold discharge area" draining to the identified problem qualifies for an exemption from Core Requirement #3: Flow Control The manner in which runoff is discharged does not create a significant adverse impact to drainage systems, erosion potential, nor downstream flooding since the modeling shows a zero increase in post developed 100-year flows, and the dispersal to the wetland and stream will -take advantage of any natural reservoir capacity and peak flow buffering effects that those elements may offer. In conclusion, since the increase in the 100-year runoff for the developed versus the predeveloped condition is less than 0.1 cfs, and the project is a Redevelopment project, this site qualifies for an exception from core requirement #3, flow control, per exception # 1, pg. 1-27 of the KCSWM. A Geotechnical Engineering Study may be completed, but the SCS soils mapping shows Alderwood Till soils, which are usually low permeability. Although County Code generally allows infiltration in accordance with geotechnical recommendations, site and/or roof downspout infiltration is currently thought to not be suitable for the site. See Section IV of the TIR for details. Core Requirement 4: Conveyance System A conveyance analysis will be conducted using KCRTS 15 min interval 25 year flows. More detailed conveyance analysis will be provided for internal site piping in Section V, Conveyance System Analysis and Design during the construction document phase. Core Requirement 5: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Preliminary Erosion Control Systems are recommended in Section IX of the TIR. A separate ESP Plan will be prepared for the Final Construction Document Phase. Core requirement 6: Maintenance and Operations Maintenance and Operations manual is required per KCSWMSection 1.2.6 (pg 1-54) for all drainage facilities. Since the proposed drainage system will consist of new catch basin, conveyance piping and water quality facilities, a maintenance and operations manual sections will be included in Section X of the TIR during the construction document phase. Core Requirement77: Financial Guarantees and Liability The proposed project drainage system consists of new conveyance piping, catch basins, and water quality facilities. Therefore, per paragraph 1 of KCSWM 1.2.7, financial guarantees are required and Bond Quantity Worksheets will be supplied for the Final Construction Document Phase. Core Requirement 8: Water Quality Per KCSWM 1.2.8 "Water Quality" (Pg 1.57), All projects, including redevelopment projects, must provide water quality facilities. The site lies in a "basic WQ Treatment Area" per the WQ Applications Map. The building roof will not be metal. 14,810 SF of new, replaced or redeveloped PGIS (which is C� more than 5,000 square feet) will be added per "new impervious surface" definition on page 12, Definitions. Therefore, standard W.Q. exemptions (per KCSWM 1.2.8,Pg 1-58) are not applicable. Hence, Water Quality Treatment is required for this re -development project and will be provided in a basic bioswale (See Section IV for details). Special R uirement # 1: Other adopted area -specific Leguirements. A review of on-line City map images indicates that there is a wetland onsite and a stream just to the east of the property. The wetland has been delineated as class 2 and appears on the project topographic survey, as does the stream grading. The stream is listed as a Major Stream (T-2) and the appropriate 100' setback is shown on the plans. The site is located in the Lower Green River Basin. The site is not in a wellhead protection zone. Special_ Requirement #2: Floodplain/Floodway delineation The project contains or is adjacent to a stream and a wetland, but not a lake or closed depression. As such, a floodplain study is normally required. A downstream survey was conducted (copy attached) and interviews with staff and local residents concludes that the Camelot Trailer Park periodically floods in the vicinity of South 19e Place. At that location, the local stream is conveyed in a ditch line which first enters a 48" culvert located about one hundred feet upstream of the intersection of Camelot Drive and Lyonese Place. The ground over the culvert at that location is elevation 413 and below. Clearly, if the culvert should overtop, then sheet flow would occur at shallow depths on the order of several tenths of a foot, given the very wide and unencumbered area in which sheet flow could occur. This then sets the constraint for downstream flooding per KDSWDM 4.4.2.1, such that the minimum finish floor for the proposed facility should be 2' above the overflow elevation of 413, or equal to a min. finish floor elevation of 415. The culvert at the Camelot/Lyonese Place intersection is known to flood, but the roadway crest above it lies at approximate elevation 408, such that it constitutes a much lower relative elevation and consequently is not controlling with regard to flood impact at the proposed development site. Special R.f,,guirement #3: Flood Protection Facilities The project is adjacent to a stream, but the stream does not have an existing flood protection facility, such as a levee or berm. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the site. Special Requirement #4: Source Controls Per KCSWM 1.3.4 "source controls" Pg 1-73, if a proposed project requires a commercial building or commercial site development permit, then water quality source controls applicable to the project shall be apply. Source Controls will be designed and documented in concert with the Final Construction Document phase and may include items such as dumpster area roofing. Special Requirement #5: Oil -Control The site is a commercial site subject to an expected average daily traffic (ADT) less than 100 vehicles per 1,000 square feet of gross building area. Additionally, it is not a petroleum storage or service station site, nor is it intended as storage for more than 25 diesel vehicle fleet. As such, the site is not required to meet the High Use menu standards. seas image Map Page Page 1 of 1 City of Fad a ra I Way" � FederalM Ave Way, 33325 8fft Ave S. ■ r Federal Way, WA 980D3 Federal Way Critical Areas,? wayvva.us 'Kent _ ,°uget s; LOWER 41 Sn::rarf r . GREEN RIVER _ ral a '` w MILL I1' CREEK ake �aRrry Srss; L, 1 lake lake `:� � � ��>� _ rage j � � �'��, ,�•�, 1 Near �s LOWER " ``!7 MET SOUND aw CA* `�m a HYLEROS$*— J, raan CREEK) '"Y' -� Tacoma WHITE RIVER,i i ILM r.iil'f1 "i j Edgew 1'hlr r�l ii imunderS►reuFa ai a legend: 1 roptKenratlon DMY Scale: Hy9who�CAak Basin Wti9a Rear Basin Zhu G+DY o! federa4 WsY mama 0 112 1 Mee Lmw&eeM R1%r BMn LsrWWO Hum Amu nQwarralrty xato�ls xcray- L VxW PMW Swnsd Bata+ emsion Maxard Areas M 0 v2 1 nornwer K49CrwkBaale Wetlende 1 FtderAlWay Ycll:n�VLrH:�' Arry mx • �-,m 1h 3 MO:: flc U-.Or.te IN 2 7:E_ c:rv: rr.Itlt+lr�k'rielRrl"tl�ltoirFrnG &M http://www.cityoifederalway.com/folderslhomelbtisinesseconomicdevelopmentleitymaps/en... 1 /9/2007 Hrciivio v iewer Page 1 of 1 ' 4 S 285TH PL p� 296TH ST � 1 J i J s UNKNUWN I ? 5 287T H ST A rn ry J A W �r n y to ' 6 N 1 f 5 289T H y 288TH PL ;I S 288TH PL a � R tr ST LAM4 ��11 V11`,,�� Py,¢, a = r 5 290TH ST x r w�v f S 29IST ST S 2918T ST 13 S 292 I41 z IL h3 _ '� ?r f x �I F sr s C4 F O r S 294TH PL Rp m u 5' $'P� 3 a ; S STK ST S 2d4TH P1 SIR GARETH DR m m S 296TH ST yi r� ❑ CANTEBURY DR A in r i_ F r S 20"l m = 4 p t or ~ I m i- 4 u+ S 296TH ST S 206TH PL q "' S 29TTH PL d oq A m y lux I — T dJ '5' 9 f ., N N ui Z Q W '_ Q T) 2BfiTH S 298TS H ST A S 2WTH ST i Z �•. q S 299TH Pt w o4 d N al$ 29gTli P6 .- m '�` 4 S 298TH ST , S 299TI1 ST 5 300TH ST S 300TH ST z 929N� S 301 ST ST Pt ►� 1ajcvw3dwi A-ciMS-Cm}'gn;Cpl9M-2M7 SMk=. http://maps.cityoffedeMway.com/website/env1010/MapFrame.htm 8/1/2007 �� 4 % 0 1 AM TS � _ a q . y r MODIE I a � 5 6 21 f 0 1 ;a I 1 1 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW The project scope consists of replacing an existing church and concrete pad with a new church and new paved parking lot surfaces. After demolition, replaced paving and a new building will be constructed. The site is located at the 29276 Military Road South in the City of Federal Way, Washington. A Modification Waiver request has been submitted for Frontage Road Improvements, Site design criteria are based on the 2005 King County Storm Drainage Manual. H. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY The property is currently developed as an existing church, parking lot and single-family residence. Existing grades slope very mildly towards the east. Drainage from the site is discharged to an existing storm drain lying in 16" Ave SW.. A Geotechnical Report may be completed. Site soils are classified by SCS as glacial till. An existing Class 2 wetland has been delineated and extends over most of the east % of the property. A major stream lies directly east of the east property line. There are no indications of closed depressions on the property. M. OFT -SITE ANALYSIS (LEVEL ONE DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS) An offsite analysis is included in the Appendix. IV. PROPOSED DRAINAGED IMPROVEMENTS The project scope consists of replacing an existing church and concrete pad with a new church and new paved parking lot surfaces. The site lies in a level 1-flow control area, but qualifies for the 0.1 cfs exemption. (See discussion under core requirement #4 review. Hence, no detention is required, but water quality treatment is required (see discussion under core requirement #8 review). A large basic bioswale is proposed to meet these requirements. A Modification Waiver request has been submitted to omit Frontage Improvements. Computations were performed using KCRTS methodology to determine the pre- and post developed 100 year flow difference (less than 0.1 cfs). J i yy.OH Y f 0 v c cc a Cn O c 3 n q� N CIO r � l — t lstAVF S 1 N E._. S PACIFIC S ACIFIC HWY Si. L.� �}lI1L1Z -YSH-A -..L.. •'--I�- M1il7ARY 51at AVE 51N . OD .-..1I £gNTUgi � r > n WW X �I G m F I mv lz Co $ r ro a n -op +, -rl n c m w p = CL 'm m == o = ic N D oCL n In D U ✓W rc A N D m c 0 �r toJE d t Q N (j t S AV LIJVC, . Military 1 .l- r�. •fir a`Y. S �-�1v ism W NZ 1IL r �• ���•� {� loa -'f �I , �'. '� � rie '} { :fir .�; • � �. F."�[+�. •: ` ,� � i � �s ' } it ar. � tir: ► ,�! :rcr CIF _ ll�k� �� r :.i•.a� �. , ,Ali �•_ _ a ;. _ rti Ell .:wry 1•..• �• w��.r� !fir :�: ��i. �~ �! �,���.�.f.-`� k t.� gft{j{7' IL 44A •t:��� ,' Jam— - j f.-��� � � Y � �! 1 it � �' R •+ � . � � 'e ��f �i � _ � i r=� R Wl Atw 4.1 It - :4. V ..r4._ .Y.r -s ,�. f l� r• t �sc ;4'li: .."•ten r:, r . �;.[ � �'� �.�� � w '���-` � ` '� - Av -���}. i� ; �' _ �' :�'� , 3 �.. a _•"� - • 7,• � e. ! 3 }r ~ONEW I - � 1•. mow• -; +� i •� tc � • • _� f. '+ ,F, tal el le MINALP that - _:eil ! •w� i Ix 3.2.2 KCRTS/RUNOFF EiLE.c METHOD —GENERATING 77MESERIES TABLE 31111; EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN SCS SOIL TYPES AND KCRTS SOIL TYPES SCS Soil Type SCS Hydrologic Soil Group KCRTS Soil Group Notes Alderwood (AgB, AgC, AgD) C Till Arents, Alderwood Material (AmB, AmC) C Arents, Everett Material (An) B Outwash 1 Beausite (BeC, BeD, BeF) C Till 2 Bellingham (Bh) D Till 3 Briscot (Br) D Till 3 Buckley (Bu) D Till 4 Earlmont (Ea) D Till 3 Edgewick (Ed) C Till 1 3 Everett EvB, EvC, EvD, EWC) A/B Outwash 1 Indianola (InC, InA, InD) A Outwash 1 Kitsap (KpB, KpC, KpD) C Till Klaus (KsC) C Outwash 1 Neilton (NeC) A Outwash 1 Newberg (Ng) B Till 3 Nooksack (Nk) C TUL 3 Norma (No) Till ,' 3 Orcas (Or) D Wetland Oridia (Os) D Till 3 Ovall (OvC, OvD, OvF) C Till 2 Pilchuck (Pc) C Till 3 Puget (Pul D Till 3 Pu allu B Till 3 Ragnar (RaC, RaD, RaC, RaE) B Outwash 1 Renton Re D Till 3 Salal (Sa) C Till 3 Sammamish (Sh) D Till 3 Seattle Sk) D Wetland Shalcar (Sm D Till 3 Si (Sri) C Till 3 Snohomish (So, Sr) D Till 3 Sultan (Su) C Till 3 Tukwila (Tu) D Till 3 Woodinville (Wo) D Till 3 Notes: 1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth (<5 feet) by glacial till, they should be treated as till soils. 2. These are bedrock soils, but calibration of HSPF by King County DNRP shows bedrock soils to have similar hydrologic response to till soils. 3. These are alluvial soils, some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study, these soils should be treated as till soils. 4. Buckley soils are formed on the low -permeability Osceola mudflow. Hydrologic response is assumed to be similar to that of till soils. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1242005 3-25 SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTI pN AND ANALYSIS METHODS FIGURE 3.2.2.A RAINFALL REGIONS AND REGIONAL SCALE FACTORS ST 1.1 ST 1.1 Rainfall f Regiaonal 77--] Incorporated Area[] . co River/Lakeo Major Roadp 0 ST 1.0/ ST 1.0 1 n n_R LA 0.9 LA 1.0 LA 1.2 1 /24/2005 2005 Since Water Design Manual 3-22 -- --- 1=+�_�U1W�_��� f•'(-C�'�- -- - _ fir?` Z�- 0 � _ _.�-. SCS n7�+�vpiny - A� e, �1L i�tta�on C�"0 a 7/�- � WA4 Ct��PD?►'�- PE61ZWOL, Sc1?1e6 P40 L— SI_/.0 �cM Ck-j- RU ()5 F- t aton&oL C- a k c.. ppcD 4 Lu 4uL5 5ob-rvr !ivVy. U)ET Aun 9O vS C[-irrs� Ta 57Rc1 C ROM, 4 tml-{c rAtD4 k& `oT 5 O tJTb-r. Tk'I I )G-t-At,P -rrrTtLL 62h5s 2. _2.69 4c t.KJ s f -)v6_ D. Ol Ac b, o f- Ac- 0 ,7D Ac D°6Z 44 '0.6$ p.4 Ac. l) , 4:4 AL o •-) c - 0, 70 Ac- ! , sS nn. / . Ss 4` -F>ZD �h o �TP�r Sc� A zr ��c<rL�° g1DO b, 5-43 e,Fs 4 = 6 �" cr-s - 6 /R!S lG�tlfrchuT- / OTr-: %hD CL lJ FO2 Eun2c 01JSCr A rb6lmr t Tl-t6 Rz FIDAl K c sw h -� . iF . � ''ice 7 � � �+ � �- • { j r 4 - i .r r• r� � •tip' � •i got 77 vil 9 9IN77 G fit i• f. f Zf L A. _i 4 f 1�• + f r.1 Site: Midway Samoan AG N Source: USGS Date: 9-4-1972 County: King, WA �, s Scale: V = 700' GegpSeerch C7 *` V a r X N �S 4.S W Ci, J.-o W LL. II P� l n�� �p m W x � g �2cm zF 1p o x go x p J n n i i i ih u) r eft — IV x T7 In N (G w N i--� 1 , � rn 1 c3 t to n y� S r 97.7 X CID Orr FP Y i of PP Total Area T. 69 acres Peak Discharge 0.584 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Tine Series File:dev.tsf 8 Tine Series Computed --� KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Nodule Help Files KCRTS Flow Frequoncq Analysis Time Series File:predev.tsf Project Looation:Sea-Tac -Annual Peak Flow Rates - Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.342 3 2/O9/01 2:00 0.177 6 1/05/02 16:00 0.403 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.139 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.176 7 10/28/04 16:00 0.258 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.237 5 11/24/06 3:00 O.5B3 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks Flow Frequenc7 Analysis Time Series File:dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac -Annual Peak Flow Rates - Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.342 3 2/O9/01 2:00 0.177 6 1/05/02 16:00 0.403 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.139 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.176 7 10/28/04 16:00 0.258 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.237 5 11/24/06 3:00 0.583 1 1/09/08 6:00 :amputed Peaks s -Flow Frequency Analysis- - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.583 1 100.00 0.990 0.403 2 25.00 0.960 0.342 3 10.00 0.900 0.25E 4 5.00 0.800 0.237 5 3.00 0.667 0.177 6 2.00 0.500 0.176 7 1.30 0.231 0.139 0 1.10 0.091 0.523 50.00 0.980 -Flow Frequency Analysis- - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period w 0.583 1 100.00 0.990 0.403 2 25.00 0.960 0.342 3 10.00 0.900 0.258 4 5.00 8.800 0.237 5 3.00 6.667 0.177 6 2.00 0.500 0.176 7 1.30 0.231 Q.139 8 1.10 0.091 0.523 50.00 0.980 v files vill be readivritten in the Yorking Directory ing Directory:c:\KC SQDlf\output KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location Sea-Tac Computing Series predev.tsf anal Scale Factor 1.00 Data Type Reduced Ling Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:-,i(C-SODH\S[C_DATAISTTG60R.rnf 0 Grass 1.55 acres Scaling Yr: 0 Loading Time Series File: C:\KC_SIM1f\S(CJ)ATA`iTWL60R.rnf 6 and 0.70 acres Adding Yr: B Loading Time Series File: C:\KC SVDFgOq DATA\ MI60R.rnf 2 xcious 0.44 acres Adding Yr: 6 Total Area : 2.69 acres Discharge: 0.584 CFS at 6:00 an Jan 9 in Year B Storing Time Series File:predev.tsf B Time Series Computed KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location Sea-Tac Computing Series dev.tsf icmal Scale Factor 1.00 Data Type Reduced sting Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File: C:\KC SFDM\HC_DAT&NSTTG60R.rnf 8 1 Grass 1.55 acres Scaling Yr: B Loading Time Series File:C:-,SIC_S9DNIlKC_DATA%STYL60R.rnf 9 land 0.70 acres Adding Yr: 8 Loading Time Series File: C:\KC_ VDX\KC-DATANSTEI60R.rnf 0 ervious 0.44 acres Adding Yr: 0 11 Analysis Tools Command ---------------------- Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies ---------------------------------- Loading Stage/Discharge curve:dev.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:dev.pks Analysis Tools Command ---------------------- Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Time Series File:predev.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:predev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:predev.pks Analysis Tools Command ---------------------- RETURN to Previous Menu A Qa Si tit _o �S ' Ik 0 [T� r W W Na N � �F_ Vbi OZ3 of N 2 �i=0 �HfIIU P t9 q�� bf 0 F U IL a Y Y JppQQ �i t i p k 1Y e PIr� IS� �k . HIM ill ., pV'( l-plM 4�i�SbU �GSIy►� 2 ti2yev I h pEV,V (LF 4 = 0.44 & } -A /4� f C � AlIC4 I .�lv. Ft G �GLL. lT/U!%J�s csc-A Le r-prvb i— = 1 - 3. L iAlC- 5�?7 = t S-/m1/,j 37� I ■■■ :�• L fit Sit4wtt [u�:us 1MCoo �dit�; r..fz;L. t°�, O�ZI cra = � h Zc7 = SWe 6.4q (r q) `'G X 6.01 Z S. 4 L4 Act, t C_ , T e- 5 -5 tJ -S Y-,C!5T G tl ' 0-104 i3*/0, Ld/a KA [ ,� FOR WATER QUALITY STORM, KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series ------------------------ Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location Sea-Tac Computing Series WQ.tsf Regional Scale Factor 1.00 Data Type Reduced Creating 15-minute Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC SWDM\KC DATA\STTG15R.rnf Till Grass 0.50 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC DATA\STEI15R.rnf Impervious 0.44 acres -------------- Total Area 0.94 acres Peak Discharge: 0.772 CFS at 6:30 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:wQ.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command ------------- Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module ------------------------------- Analysis Tools Command ---------------------- Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies ---------------------------------- Loading Stage/Discharge curve:wq.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis -------------------------------------------------------- Time Series File:wq.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:WQ.pks Analysis Tools Command ---------------------- RETURN to Previous Menu ,, 60% OF 2 YEAR DEVELOPED Q = WATER QUALITY STORM = 0.6 X 0.21 CFS = .126 CFS 6A.1 WL•TPONDS — BASI' " ND LARGE — AfE7I1ODSOFAAWL15I5 r� FIGURE 6.4.I.A PRECIPITATION FOR MEAN ANNUAL STORM IN INCHES (FEET) ST 1.7 0.54" (0.045`) — - ; Incorporate -fig RiverA-ake — Major Roat NOTE: Areas eas inches unless rainfall data is available €ar the location of interest ST 1.0/ Sir 1.0 ._— .- __ IA In LA1_2 24 The mean annual slam Is a conceptual storm found by divtdb►g the annual preck tt fion by the rota) number olsWrm evursl:Per yea, v.w (0.047) (0.054') result, generates large amounts of runoff. For this application, till soil types include Buckley and bedrock soils, and alluvial and outwash soils that have a seasonally high water table or are underlain at a shallow depth (less than 5 feet) by glacial till. U.S_ Soil Conservation Service (SCS) hydrologic soil groups that are classified as till soils include a few B, most C, and all D soils. See Chapter 3 for classification of specific SCS soil types. 2005 SuffarL Water Design Manual 1 1 6-71 1 /24/2005 V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Since project is less than 1 acre, then conservatively, A= 0.365 acre C= 0.9 I15=2.5" Q=CIA = 0.9x0.365x2.5=0.82 cfs A 8" cmp (n=0.024) @ 2% slope yields 0.9cfs 0.9 cfs>0.82 cfs : o.k A 10" cmp (n=0.024) @ 0.65% slopeyields 0.9cfs 0.9 cfs>0.82 cfs : o. k VI. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS (NA) VI1. OTHER PERMITS (N.A.) VI1. EROSIONISEDIlVWNTATION CONTROL DESIGN Erosion Control BMP's shall consist of a rock construction entrance, silt fencing, catch basin protection and temporary silt traps. IX. BOND QUANTITIES WORK SHEET, RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND SKETCH, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT X. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL Level One Downstream Analysis as Described in KCS`1VDM . PRELM NAR. Pwpared by Larry E. Steward PE 2473 8 SB Uffrormont lDive Issaquah, Wasb 98027 E®ail iesteward h m CeU 425-765-9962 Office,425-392-6111 Site at 292.76 South Military road . Federal Way, Washington �P�� Corr 2,-3 aFKC��I�BM �-Page- - survey of each dowastr+eam system leaving the site. Thomas Guide Pap 745 C1 Kifig County Se"tive Areas Folio M8P 6 This project is using PROCESS TV The site slopes slightly down to the: east where there is a gaadpWn where tbere-was water short 6 inches deep near the east property lire. Tie is a very large wetland that is shown on parcels labeled as 29279, 29250. 29002 and 29200_ This wetland has law growing deciduous trees and water at the time of the field inspection on Yanuary 18,2006. The wdsha' at the time: affield rccon was Slightly rains y. This had been piccede d by a near record of 27 or 28 days ofprecipitatinn. (The record was 33 days in 1953). Thc.ground was sawrsted- Tho class 2 vewetland is fed by a 18" (estimate) culvim t that runs uad� b?tu'Y Way from the west side to t he east side. The in CUlvext termates (=Mftg to the surrey by Dan Price) in and open Type 11 storm drain manhole ( full of de bTi s) on the east a of Military Way. These is a ditch of sorts that nuns through a thick blackbwy p to Uzdd s wetland that is'300 to 400 fact wile in an east west direction =0 about 800 £net long to the north . There was z(-channel is fairly regular so it appears manmade stream running about It] feet wide and 2 feet deep on the eastside of this property and the wetland. It apex's (see 1"�=qUo') on City of Federal Way Map 703-NE. The stream appearsto dlxain the wedan&artimes and in,extreme rains; it tuay-help-ta-'flood the-' - wetiand..(along with the 1gn culvert previously mentioned. The limit ofthe'level 1 field analysis is,/ au1e. I did not sm anycagacity resu irn on the day that I was there. Them was a drainage problem though 'There was some w4tru over a short driveway sag cum in the Camelot Square While Rome Park nearthe above mentioned Own I -did riGt Sde:7 ater in the skirting of the trailers. I drove through ft water with my pickup truck but a small low ear would have had at Cif Ffloorboard. y Ttm water Tt 743 Iin the steam flows toward Interstate 5' freemy. ml 0 Vn CJtydt=edatWay -G75DWAon-P.O.Bm19718-3 MSthPom-S-Federal Way, WA9WS3-9778-(M)-MS -7OW- *w9 a.... ... Gn�r ...... _.... _ _ may:..... a' a yi W �• , 2a'Tti ai43 So99TH IL .7 . f •' -eo is S—TH SIT ww,n• -9r 1 •!• w —; n S 291ST ST �i 72• n' ;� 5292HDST we �'• wiP ��s ._.. , - it •__....---_... , - • �� r f ".".., M`4 wl" • Mwl..•• •r �• y�\MO r',A 1 r N . �l� . . 1 •f�ilW lw.\ w7r stir w �.• •� �I� • �+ • V r 1 1 ., "ts29i a d wn .err .% ww� w221 } ISO 113 332 114 � 1 J w 3S w m 4 sa4 r• 2.1 Iz— • - • - Map 21 0 �NE-M-94 AA stresom Ba6dWsimBetaMaly I 18 � 2MCwfwlndex City Lwa oTax P. BourKfWy �,r,�,,,;,,-yam,,,• w'!sra..,w.w CRY OF m /,MC tour De ooWw FWPAABou,dary 6tr4d.rqu, ceoon—W and R,RY L+�U ��ww h,Wy NPYb���wewwn w . Federal Way ... 51t Co tour Inter, Cd"Jwlra Paved Edge of Roadway d ,m ,W 4m auarter 6emon CordnurAtlea '� srtcon6wapaprcnbn Quarter lemon Boundary r.w...>a.w rsd N FINAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) (Including Downstream Analysis in Appendix) MIDWAY SAMOAN ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH Location: 29276 Military Road South Federal Way, WA 98003 a.k.a. City File No. 07-101136-00-UP June 9, 2008 Revised May 6, 2009 By Sound Consultants, LLC Seattle, Washington 98136 SC Job No. 2006023 u� E. Hq G. �Q 21823 (� p� �� SS/ONAL RESUBMITTED MAY 13 2009 CITY OF FFOERAL WAY BULDING DEPT. 'ld3❑ JNIUllf18 ,&dM lda-30i-j �n Ain 60OZ 9 1 AVN TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Core and Special Requirements Analysis B. Technical Information Report I. Project Overview H. Preliminary Conditions Summary III. Off -site Analysis (Appendix) IV. Proposed Drainage Improvements V. Conveyance Systems Analysis and Design VI. Basin and Community Planning Areas VII. Other Permits VIII. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Design IX. Bond Quantities Work Sheet, Retention/Detention Facility, Summary Sheet and Sketch, and Declaration of Covenant X. Maintenance and Operation Manual Appendix -Level One Downstream Analysis -Geotechnical Study (pending) .-ltu) U1NOai, aquas; A#4V 4ppawq,_ 1.1.2 DRAINAGE REVIEW TYPES AND REQUIREMENTS FIGURE 1.1.2.A FLOW CHART FOR DETERMINING TYPE OF DRAINAGE REVIEW REQUIRED Is the project a, single family residential or agricultural project that results in 2,000 sf of new impervious surface and meets one of the following criteria? • The project results in 510,000 sf of total impervious surface added since 1/8/01 and <_35,000 sf of new pervious surface, or for sites zoned as RA, F, or A, new pervious surface <_70,000 sf or 35% of the site, Yes whichever is greater, OR • The project results in 54% total impervious surface and :915% new pervious surface on a single parcel site zoned as RA or F, or a single/multiple parcel site zoned as A, and all impervious area on the site, except 10,000 sf of it, will be set back from its natural location of discharge from the site at least 100 ft for every 10,000 sf of total impervious surface? Does the project result in 2:2,000 sf of new impervious surface or >_35,000 sf of new pervious surface, OR is the project a redevelopment project on a parcel or combination of parcels in which new plus replaced impervious surface totals >_5,000 sf and whose valuation of proposed improvements (excluding required mitigation and frontage improvements) is >50% of the assessed value of existing improvements? SMALL PROJECT DRAINAGE REVIEW Section 1.1.2.1 Note: The project may also be subject to Targeted Drainage Review as determined below. Does the project have the characteristics of one or more of the following categories of projects (see the more detailed threshold language on p. 1-14)? 1. Projects containing or adjacent to a flood, erosion, or steep slope hazard area; projects within a Critical Drainage Area No or Landslide Hazard Drainage Area; or projects that propose >_7,000 sf (3 ac if the project is in Small Project Drainage Review) of land disturbing activity. 2. Projects proposing to construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12" or larger or receives runoff from a 12" or larger drainage pipe/ditch. 3. Redevelopment projects proposing >_$100,000 in improvements to an existing high -use site. NO 1 Yes Reassess whether TARGETED DRAINAGE REVIEW drainage review is Section 1.1.2.2 required per Section 1.1.1 (p. 1-9). Is the project an Urban Planned Development (UPD), OR does it result in z50 acres of new impervious surface within a subbasin or multiple subbasins that are hydraulically connected, OR does it have a project site >_50 acres within a critical aquifer recharge area? Yes FULL DRAINAGE REVIEW Section 1.1.2.3 LARGE PROJECT DRAINAGE REVIEW Section 1.1.2.4 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1 /24/2005 1-11 5 2.1 INDIVIDUAL LOT BMP REQUIREMENTS FIGURE 5.2.1.A FLOW CHART FOR DETERMING INDIVIDUAL LOT BMP REQUIREMENTS Is the prefect on a sitellot Yes Is it feasible and applicable to smaller than 22,000 square feet? implement full Yes rther BMPs Apply one or more of the fallowing to impervious area 20°I° dispersion for the roof area as per p red. Note: proposed FGnne �1t7°!a of site/tot for s7#ellot sizes �11,000 sf and of _ between 11.000 and 22.000 sf (For Section C.2.1?downspouts ction of roofsitellot for sitellot sixes projects located in crilical aquifer recharge areas these No to local drainage impervious area amounts double): system must be 1. Limited infiltration (section C.2.3) is it feasible via perforated 2. Basic Dispersion (section C.2.4) and applicable pipe connection 3. Rain Garden (Section C.2.5) to implement Yes No per Section 4. Permeable Pavement (Section C.2.6) full infiltration C.2.11. 5. Rainwater Harvesting (Section C.2.7) of the roof to, fi. Vegetated Roof (Section C.2.B) 7. Reduced impervious Service Credit (Section C.2.9) runoff as per Section C.2.2? 8. Native Growth Retention Credit (section C.2.10) Is the prajecl on a sitellot 22,000 square feet es Is it feasible and or larger with impervious surface applicable to implement covera a of 45% or less? full dispersion on all Yes No further BMPs target impervious required. Note: surface as per Any proposed the following BMPs must be implemented Section C.2.1? connection of roof ❑ne or more of for that portion of target impervious surface not addressed No downspouts to local drainage system No with full dispersion or with full infiltration of roof runoff. 1. Full Infiltration (Section C.2.2 or Section 5.4) Is it feasible and applicable to must be via pipe 2. Limited Infiltration (Section C.2.3) -NO� implement full infiltration of perforated 3. Basic Dispersion (Section C.2.4) Q-- the roof runoff as per Section C.22 or Section 5.49 connection per Section C.2.11. 4. Rain Garden (Section C.2.5) 5. Permeable Pavement (Section C.2.6) Yes Yes 6. Rainwater Harvesting (Section C.2.7) Is there any remaining target 7. Vegetated Roof (Section C.2.8) Impervious Service Credit (Section C.2.9) impervious surface not No 8. Reduced 9. Native Growth Retention Credit Section C.2.101 addressed with full dispersion or with full infiltration of roof runoff? The project must be a sitellot 22,000 square feet Is it feasible and or larger with impervious surface applicable to implement coverage of more than 45%? full dispersion on all target impervious No surface as per Projects with impervious area greater than 45% and equal to or Section C.2.1? less than 65% one or more of the following must be applied to an impervious area greater than or equal to 20% of the site or 40% of Yes the target impervious surface whichever is less OR for projects greater than 65% impervious one or more -of the following must be No further BMPs applied to an impervious area greater than or equal to 10% of site required. Note: or 20% of target impervious surface, whichever is less: Any proposed 1. Full Infiltration (Section 5.4) connection of roof 2_ Limited Infiltration (Section C.2.3) downspouts to 3. Basic Dispersion (Section C.2.4) local drainage 4. Rain Garden (Section C.2.5) system must be 5. Permeable Pavement (Section C.2.6) via perforated 6. Rainwater Harvesting (Section C.2.7) pipe connection 7. Vegetated Roof (Section C.2.8) per Section 8. Reduced Impervious Service Credit (Section C.2.9) C.2.11. 9. Native Growth Retention Credit (Section C.2.10) 1 /24/2005 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 5-11 KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner M+D00 S AMbAM ASW. OF bDD Phone Address Project Engineer HPIL 14D bGM-53M Com any -SDs)► i) GbM SULTl4►,1i�. LLL I - Phone ZDG- 013i .Ae Ii b I Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION I ❑ Landuse Services Sul)divlson / ShortSubd. / UPD Building Services M/F / Commerical / SFR ❑ Clearing and Grading ❑ Right -of -Way Use ❑ Other Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name DDES Permit # _ Location Township 'Z I IV Range t Section NE'/4 4 Site Address 2-92-7(0 N11L1T/42q kL• 5 I Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS ❑ DFW HPA ❑ Shoreline ❑ COE 404 Management ❑ DOE Dam Safety ❑ Structural RockeryNault/ ❑ FEMA Floodplain ESA Section 7 COE Wetlands ❑ Other Part 5 PLAN AND REPORT INFORMATION Technical information Report Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans) Type of Drainage Review (iulD I Targeted I Type (circle one): Full / Modfied I (circle): Large Site mall Site Date (include revision - D8 Date (include revision 6' 9 -09 dates): dates): Date of Final: Date of Final: Part S ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS Type (circle one): Standard / Complex / Preapplicabon / Experimental / Blanket Description: (include conditions in TIR Section ) ,• <<; . ra S. ZD/Aj) VAR./AgCC- ,'r L-XC'Mr1 rlit,,uc:d r!iuivt riOli'•' Date of I J 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1 111105 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (T1R) WORKSHEET Part 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monitoring Required: Yes / No Start Date: Completion Date: Part 8 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Plan Special District Overlays: _ Drainage Basin: L n w C T Stormwater Requirements: G Describe: Part 9 ONSITE AND ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS (oU41'r1L & UAL iin ® River/Stream ❑ Steep Slope Lake ❑ Erosion Hazard r❑ U Wetlands ❑ Landslide Hazard ❑ Closed Depression ❑ Coal Mine Hazard ❑ Floodplain ❑ Seismic Hazard ❑ Other ❑Habitat Protection Part 90 SOILS Soil Type N0/2MA- -rILL ❑ High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) ❑ Other ❑ Additional Sheets Attached Slopes 3 qo ❑ Sole Source Aquifer ❑ Seeps/Springs Erosion Potential LOU) LOW 2005 Surface Water Design Manual I/I/05 2 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL 1 J TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 11 DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS REFERENCE ® Core 2 — Offsite Analysis ® Sensitive/Critical Areas ❑ SEPA ❑ Other D LIMITATION / SITE CONSTRAINT DOWU9 ROAM PLr DDNN MU F :: 41g-0 W- <i_la D ONAE f ]OW 8i)FEZ- ❑ Additional Sheets Attached I Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET(provide one TIR Summary Sheet per Threshold ❑ischa a Area Threshold Discharge Area: I�L"i F�VEIrMEAIt PDi1.�101� D� S( G name or descri Lion Core Requirements (all 8 apply) Discharge at Natural Location Number of Natural Disch2Me Locations: Olisite Analysis Level: 1 / 2 / 3 dated: '3' U. =Mtb Flow Control Level: 1 / 2 / 3 or Exemption Number 1- L< D. I CF.50 Incl. facility summM sheet Small Site BMPs Rbof D0101JAP&V `h1SPEnslrJq-VL4 1 MS Conveyance System Spill containment located at Erosion and Sediment Control ESC Site Supervisor: H L 60dLanl, Contact Phone: -DG-1139--blIA, After Hours Phone: 11 °J b - G'3 i� . io 11, �s Maintenance and Operation Responsibility: Private / Public If Private. Maintenance Log Required: Yes / o Financial Guarantees and Provided: Yes 1 No Liabil Water Quality Type: Basic / Sens. Lake / Enhanced Basicm / Bog (include facility summary sheet) or Exemption No. Landscape Management Plan: Yes / No Special Requirements as applicable Area Specific Drainage Type: CDA / SDO / MDP / BP / LMP / Shared Fac. / None Requirements Name: Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major / Minor / Exemption / None 100-year Base Flood Elevation (or range): q 13 Datum: N G VD Flood Protection Facilities Describe: N I)NE Source Control Describe landuse: C I4UR_r H (comm./industrial landuse) Describe any structural controls: NNNt 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 3 111105 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Oil Control Other Dr, Describe: �e 5truciures High -use Site: Yes 1 No Treatment BMP: /VDIDE Maintenance Agreement: Yes 1 No with whom? _ CDVCL-1-Di01-" 1 C-6. FEDDuL . Log Part 13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS ,-f DURING CONSTRUCTION MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION U Clearing Limits Uf Measures Stabilize Exposed Surfaces Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities -,/Cover Lid Perimeter Protection CyClean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure Uf Traffic Area Stabilization Operation of Permanent Facilities ❑ Sediment Retention Flag Limits of SAO and open space ❑ Surface Water Control preservation areas C�Dust ❑ Other control W�Construction S uence Part 14 STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS Note: Include Facility Summary and Sketch Flow Control Type/Description Water Quai" Type/Description ❑ Detention ❑ Biofiltration=lc �144fz:4� ❑ Infiltration ❑ Wetpool ❑ Regional Facility ❑ Media Filtration ❑,( Shared Facility ❑ Oil Control ICJ Small Site BMPs SLrr� ❑ Spill Control ❑ Other ❑ Small Site BMPs ❑ Other 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 111/05 4 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL r I I 11 j TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 15 EASEMENTS/TRACTS Part 16 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Cast in Place Vault ❑ Access Easement ❑ Retaining Wall ❑ Native Growth Protection Covenant ❑ Rockery > 4' High ❑ Tract ❑ Structural on Steep Slope ❑ Other ❑ Other Part 17 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I, or a civil engineer under my supervision, have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attached Technical Information Report. To the best of my knowl ge the information provided here is accurate. 41'0j� . oma".— 6/'Y� 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 5 111105 J A. CORE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS This section of the TIR is intended to meet agency specific requirements for a report addressing all Core and Special Requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual. Core Requirement 1. Discharge at the Natural Location The discharge location from the existing and developed site is identical. Currently, the site slopes are about 3% to the east, draining to the on -site wetland and then to the local classified stream lying near the east property line. This stream flows generally North Easterly and eventually discharges into the I-5 ROW. Since developed condition 100-yr flows are 0.883 cfs and exceed 0.5 cfs, a flow dispersal trench system is not allowed. Discharge will be tight -lined to the existing stream with a rock outfall pad. Core Requirement 2. Otfsite Analysis The following discussion is presented to inform clients, owners, interested public citizens and others regarding the decision process involved in the drainage design. Per KCSWM 1.2.2 (Pg 1-21), all projects must submit an offsite analysis report that assesses potential impacts. Exemptions are 1. DDES determines there is sufficient information for them to conclude that the project will not have a significant adverse impact, or 2. The project adds less than 2,000 SF of new impervious surface and less than 35,000 SF of new pervious surface, and does not construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size or that receives runoff from a pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size and does not contain or lie adjacent to a landslide, steep slope, or erosion hazard area or 3. The project does not change the rate, volume duration or location of discharges from the site. The project does not meet the exemption requirements above. Therefore, an offsite analysis is included. The off -site analysis was prepared by Larry Steward, P.E. prior. It identifies flooding in the downstream area, at the Camelot Square Mobile Home Park, where drainage over -tops a "short drive way sag curve". Core Requirement 3: Flow Control Per King County 1998 SWM Flow Control ADDlications Ma . the site lies in a Basic (level 1) flow control area. Section 1.2.3 of the KCSWM (pg 1-27) requires flow control for all project including redevelopment projects. For the basic flow control areas, Pg 1-31 requires matching the developed peaks to existing peak flows for the 2 and 10-year return periods. However, the project is eligible for a flow control exception. The project scope consists of replacing an existing church and concrete pad with a new church and new paved parking lot surfaces. Page 9 Photos from 1979 or prior (1972) verify that the current impervious surfaces are equal to or less than the impervious surfaces from the 1972 photo. The facility parking lot actually appears slightly larger in the 1972 photo compared with the current condition, and all of the existing buildings are shown. Conservatively, we have used the existing survey to prepare impervious/pervious area statistics. From these statistics, it can be seen that the net increase in new impervious area is zero. Using the KCRTS modeling criteria for 1-hour events the increase in flows due to the development would be 0.036 cfs. Exemption number 3 (pg 1-27) states: "Any threshold discharge area within a proposed project is exempt if the project improvements with the threshold discharge area generate less than a 0.1 cfs increase in the existing site conditions (conditions prior to 1979 or permitted after 1979) 100-year peak flow rate, AND all of the following criteria are met: a) The project is a redevelopment project, flow control BMPs must be applied as specified in Section 5.2 and the project improvements must not significant impact a "severe erosion problem or "severe flooding problem" (see page 1-ol) and must not be located within a Landslide Hazard Drainage Area, AND b) If the project is a single family residential project, the runoff from impervious surfaces must be infiltrated or dispersed using the flow control BMPs specified, in Appendix C, and any areas of native vegetation assumed not to be cleared for the purposes of computing the increase in 100-year peak flow must be preserved within a tract or by covenant as described in Appendix C, AND c) For project other than redevelopment projects and single family residential projects, the new impervious surface within the threshold discharge area must be comprised of either non -pollution -generating roofs that comply with the roof downspout control in Section 5.1 or Roads, trails, or driveways that comply with the rural roadway dispersion requirements in Section 5.2.1 AND d) The manner in which runoff is discharged from the project site must not create a significant adverse impact per Core Requirement #1. The project is a re -development project, proposing BMP's per Appendix C. There is a "severe" drainage problem (defined on Page 1-21 as "flooding over all lanes of a roadway or severely impacting a sole access driveway for runoff events less than or equal to the 100-year event"). However, per Section 1.2.2.2 Impact Mitigation, on page 1-23, item l.b), the previous discussion shows that the "natural or threshold discharge area" draining to the identified problem qualifies for an exemption from Core Requirement 43: Flow Control The manner in which runoff is discharged does not create a significant adverse impact to drainage systems, erosion potential, nor downstream flooding since the modeling shows a zero increase in post developed 100-year flows, and the dispersal to the wetland and stream will take advantage of any natural reservoir capacity and peak flow buffering effects that those elements may offer. In conclusion, since the increase in the 100-year runoff for the developed versus the predeveloped condition is less than 0.1 cfs, and the project is a Redevelopment project, this site qualifies for an exception from core requirement #3, flow control, per exception # 1, pg. 1-27 of the KCSWM. A Geotechnical Engineering Study may be completed, but the SCS soils mapping shows Alderwood Till soils, which are usually low permeability. Although County Code generally allows infiltration in accordance with geotechnical recommexidations, site and/or roof downspout infiltration is currently thought to not be suitable for the site. See Section IV of the TIR for details. I Core Requirement_ 4: _Conveyance System A conveyance analysis has been conducted using KCRTS 15 min interval 25-year flows. More detailed conveyance analysis is provided for internal site piping in Section V, Conveyance System Analysis and Design. -1 Core Requirement 5: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Preliminary Erosion Control Systems are recommended in Section IX of the TIR. A separate ESP Plan has been prepared for the Final Construction Document Phase. Core requirement 6: Maintenance and Operations Maintenance and Operations manual is required per KCSWM Section 1.2.6 (pg 1-54) for all drainage facilities. Since the proposed drainage system will consist of new catch basin, conveyance piping and water quality facilities, a maintenance and operations manual sections is included in Section X of the TIR. 1 Core Requirement 7: Financial Guarantees and Liability The proposed project drainage system consists of new conveyance piping, catch basins, and water quality facilities. Therefore, per paragraph 1 of KCSWM 1.2.7, financial guarantees are required and Bond Quantity Worksheets are supplied for the Final Construction Document Phase. Core Re uirement 8: Water QuaNy Per KCSWM 1.2.8 "Water Quality" (Pg 1.57), All projects, including redevelopment projects, must provide water quality facilities. The site lies in a "basic WQ Treatment Area" per the WQ Applications Map. The building roof will not be metal. 14,625 of new, replaced or redeveloped PGIS (which is more than 5,000 square feet) will be added per "new impervious surface" definition on page 12, Definitions. Therefore, standard W.Q. exemptions (per KCSWM 1.2.8,Pg 1-58) are not applicable. Hence, Water Quality Treatment is required for this re -development project and will be provided in a basic bioswale (See Section IV for details). �I I Social Requirement # l : Other adopted area -specific requirements. A review of on-line City map images indicates that there is a wetland onsite and a stream just to the east of the property. The wetland has been delineated as class 2 and appears on the project topographic survey, as does the stream grading. The stream is listed as a Major Stream (T-2) and the appropriate 100' setback is shown on the plans. The site is located in the Lower Green River Basin. The site is not in a wellhead protection zone. Special Requirement #2: Floodplain/Floodway delineation The project contains or is adjacent to a stream and a wetland, but not a lake or closed depression. As such, a floodplain study is normally required. A downstream survey was conducted (copy attached) and interviews with staff and local residents conclude that the Camelot Trailer Park periodically floods in the vicinity of South 190t' Place. At that location, the local stream is conveyed in a ditch line which first enters a 48" culvert located about one hundred feet upstream of the intersection of Camelot Drive and Lyonese Place. The ground over the culvert at that location is elevation 413 and below. Clearly, if the culvert should overtop, then sheet flow would occur at shallow depths on the order of several tenths of a foot, given the very wide and unencumbered area in which sheet flow could occur. This then sets the constraint for downstream flooding per KDSWDM 4.4.2.1, such that the minimum finish floor for the proposed facility should be 2' above the overflow elevation of 413, or equal to a min. finish floor elevation of 415. The culvert at the Camelot/Lyonese Place intersection is known to flood, but the roadway crest above it lies at approximate elevation 408, such that it constitutes a much lower relative elevation and consequently is not controlling with regard to flood impact at the proposed development site. Special Requirement #3: Flood Protection Facilities The project is adjacent to a stream, but the stream does not have an existing flood protection facility, such as a levee or berm. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the site. S eeial Requirement #4: Source Controls Per KCSWM 1.3.4 "source controls " Pg 1-73, if a proposed project requires a commercial building or commercial site development permit, then water quality source controls applicable to the project shall be apply. Source Controls will be designed and documented in concert with the Final Construction Document phase and may include items such as dumpster area roofing. Special. Re_yuirement_#5: Oil -Control The site is a commercial site subject to an expected average daily traffic (ADT) less than 100 vehicles per 1,000 square feet of gross building area. Additionally, it is not a petroleum storage or service station site, nor is it intended as storage for more than 25 diesel vehicle fleet. As such, the site is not required to meet the High Use menu standards. Midway Samoan Additional Downstream Topographic Survey Scope August 8, 2007 Prepared by Sound Consultants, LLC H. Hagenson �1 The purpose of the intended additional topographic survey is to determine the overflow path of drainage in those portions of the adjacent stream as it flows through Camlin Mobile Home Park. Specifically, at locations denoted by circled numbers 1 and 2, (Refer to attached map #18) it is assumed that if the culverts overflowed, drainage would continue over the ground and/or roadway embankment and then re-enter the stream further north (downstream). The Surface Water code requires that we establish the elevation of the overflow (i.e. the iground or road surface) and then design the proposed church building with a finish floor elevation at least 2 feet higher than the established overflow elevation. ' The scope of the surface should include the following at a minimum: 1- At Circled location number 1, provide diameter and material of roadway culvert, culvert invert upstream and downstream, stream cross sections (top of stream bank left, toe of stream left, toe of stream right, and top of stream bank right) at a location 25' upstream and 25' downstream from the culvert, roadway edge of pavement left and right and at centerline at the lowest sag point of the roadway ' vertical curve. 2- At Circled location number 2, provide diameter and material of embankment culvert, culvert invert upstream and downstream, stream cross sections (top of stream bank left, toe of stream left, toe of stream right, and top of stream bank right) at a location 25' upstream and 25' downstream from the culvert, and enough elevation shots to determine the elevation of the embankment overflow ' (i.e. where the storm water would go in the event the culvert was plugged, and at what elevation the stream overflow would occur). 3- Provide approximately 10 stream centerline elevations at convenient locations, with reasonable separation between shots so as to represent a rough profile of the stream bottom. Please call Hal Hagenson @ 206-938-6168 with any questions. END I 1 J FjjjWq-M- 31M ah JAIL Is 19 . ....... OP 37 to CL 72 s 291ST ST " 72 AP. ZIP- s Z.ZND ST X CA 0 225 N., M4 yr. {�' 317 20 20 .............. . .......... .......... ... .... .... 0 MW21 ME-44-21-04 cTr� F. 8--ldwY 9�� cauw---dw FedeiW Wamy i ftadEftm(Aftmomw sik Cara. O*P—ik- Cb-7 r NO ms�� mJRm _; V)w L, 0 Q � 3 �WW NN W W O Of Z 0 Z z wa� a z 0 3 z N =? a aq0 N V 'ter -Z Y 40z Oz Wz 0 4� W O N z O F O a. i l 1 n� lip I fit�pr�e��< i G §$� � a • �� , Ai as S US� VI� City of Fade, Way— GLS Division — P.O.Box 9718 — 33325 Bth Ave. S. — Federal Way, WA. 98063-9718 — (253) - 835 - 7000 — W Ww.cWederalway.cxtm Map 6 Ak - i M � � arm, ae�•r I YY� 5 288TH T 5EITH' 1 1. Fear til ,., r 19 zg } • '-..'1• II ,. 6 10 r '• 25i - �_ .-- w it n+ + • w S 2S9TH IL -"2 .7 -37 48 w - - .s.rf ••41 91 -f' j� 38 it S 290TH ST F ,� V� f - :l - ,•, a � _•'� - per:. _ -__3 Z91ST ST Amom 11w 87 r .'•. 7i, / .1 ww 89 -"-r. -_- 1 v .�� 1292N"T r90 H. ®�O ,'� off15 T •_ - ---......... .rr�pr�• f00 - wl - 74 . z .....r {'.: 1241 w �«l r r223: •_ ` 'd I394M. �vam na xi ��' 12N inn oaw, } r 220 121 713 147 224 - _2M. 114 20 .321 Map 21 N E-04-21-04 Streams T Subdivision Boundary Lakes .:..+w...w a..wwr.rwrrrwrrsa env ar m Federal Way 25ft Contour Index ^' 25ft Conlcur De on City Limb FW PAA Boundary ry O Tex Parcel Boundary Buildings. Commercial and Residential 5ft Canlour Interval Other Jurisdiction E. Paved Edge of Roadway •- �� �- �� Quarter Section Contouras Atl 51t Contour Depression Quarter Section Boundary o 1a0 aco amen N aIt ■ 1 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 The project scope consists of replacing an existing church and concrete pad with a new church and new paved parking lot surfaces. The site consists of2.69 acres. Currently, 0.46 acres of impervious area exist on the site, and the developed condition will have 0.44 acres of impervious area. 1 After demolition, replaced paving and a new building will be constructed. The site is located at the 29276 Military Road South in the City of Federal Way, Washington. A Modification Waiver request has been submitted and approved for the Frontage Road Improvements. Site design criteria are based on the 2005 King County Storm Drainage Manual. H. PRELMNARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY The property is currently developed as an existing church, parking lot and single-family residence. Existing grades slope very mildly towards the east. Drainage from the site is discharged overland to the existing stream. A Geotechnical Report may be completed. Site soils are classified by SCS as glacial till. An existing Class 2 wetland has been delineated and extends over most of the east 1/2 of the property. A major stream lies directly east of the east property line. There are no indications of closed depressions on the property. I I J II sens Image Map Page Page 1 of 1 t City of Federal Way Federal Way Critical Areas Puget Smirw City of Federal Way, 33325 8m Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 835.7000 wwrw'CUederal-way-wa.0 Kant ??ke LOWER ' ` GRFEIV� P, RIMER MILL CREEK L}ul�Laks f worth LOWER PUGET SWCAN �• r `1 �I�YjLrE9yUS take �b Tacoma WHIN VER ;�F . �N =� _ a ., ,~ ak0 1 I l.Jka Edg®wa Legend: Thk rrgp nlllhnbedfvruse ac a � rcpra�snntlan OtII,Y. SCdI®: k*bm Creak i "n While Nwer i�asim theGry o! Fnd+r�l Way males 0 112 1 Mlle �arrer C:raan f�lrar elan L&%Wlde Hazard NAag navprrardy:aeo r!s aorsy. N J L"w Pow Sound Sam Srelpan Hamrd Aram fSS n lip 1 Kiln rvilar J kAll Creek eealn WeUsnde #I `SiTc- http://www.cityoffederalway.comlfolderslhome/businesseconomicdevelopmenticitymaps/en... 1 /9/2007 ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 1 % 5 2115TH PL 285TH ST w 4 r a 7 UNKNGWN I 5 237TH ST x M 41 - 'O W fA 4 41 H 0 x i rP "� I A 3 288TH PL S 2NTH PL rr tr 3 289T1H 9T Oro a� 161 J oo + $ ST A w 4 x ¢ 0 S 29DT'H 5T 5 291ST 57 5 291ST ST ry�r� t C0) b m m �a 52,32 a N Pry rF O S 294TH PL4� AC n La r $ ?93TH ST 5 294TH PL Rom, SIR GAltETH OR d r S 296TH sr ap�T CANTE BURY OR 4 t $ 295T1� Yi- w a s 296T go, I S 296TH PL to m S 297TH P t_ a vj SST g y I x H 298TH G Q lu S 296TH ST a+ S 2"THS7 5 zg9TH PL S 2987H 57> L4!" STS9TH ST oS �9TH ST5 MIST Siva9 ammmd W.ti f-cfflS' emlzoK'C I992. MN c-,-.qI Lac99311 http://maps.cityoffederalway.com/website/env1010/MapFrame.htm 8/l /2007 l MME.�go � ���� �m a rel =i - _ r'�w+ Sri wr not i - - s; • r>f�' I _a x� 14 AI "� .�. FIUAM too 400 :l,V,if- ,ate=•.C::'aS �a �� - • ._ t - i s� +lip OWL AI ' r � it � �� � • '�r � ��� � �� � � ram. �.. t � 1 f t _ I ifC tl E-.= . ' f'9:1K , s$ 1-Y ■yr��F ' r�-�•�■����� +'F�� � � �)�riA iq -------------------- 21 M. OFF -SITE ANALYSIS (LEVEL ONE DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS) An offsite analysis is included in the Appendix. Page 23 IV. PROPOSED DRAINAGED IMPROVEMENTS The project scope consists of replacing an existing church and concrete pad with a new church and new paved parking lot surfaces. The site lies in a level 1-flow control area, but qualifies for the 0.1 cfs exemption. (See discussion under core requirement #4 review. Hence, no detention is required, but water quality treatment is required (see discussion under core requirement #8 review). A basic bioswale is proposed to meet these requirements. Drainage will be collected from the parking lot area, building roof area and contributing uphill pervious area and conveyed through a bioswale, and then discharged to the existing stream with a rock pad at the outfall. A Modification Waiver request has been submitted to omit Frontage Improvements. Computations were performed using KCRTS methodology to determine the pre- and post developed 100-year flow difference (less than 0.1 cfs) using 1-hour time steps. Peak flows for use in bioswale design and conveyance design were computed using KCRTS methodology with 15-minute time steps and historic site conditions. I J J J J J J J KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SURFACE- WATER DESIGN MANUAL STORMWATER FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET DDES Permit Number I (provide one Stormwater Facility Summary Sheet per Natural Discharge Location) Overview: Project Name M 1DW AEI SAMDku ib!�SCjt&y ®F CW CHOLL M Downstream Drainage Basins Major Basin Name LMEL Ufr=m P.NefL Immediate Basin Namey M -UlkKEi) F4&7btL C-Li2aM Flow Control: Flow Control Facility Name/Number N /A - E'CE ?T Facility Location Date 6a-`1-00 If none, Flow control provided in regional/shared facility (give location) No flow control required Exemption number 1 C5 0 General Facility Information: Type/Number of detention facilities: Type/Number of infiltration facilities: ponds ponds vaults tanks tanks trenches Control Structure Location Type of Control Structure Size of Orifice/Restriction: No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 1 Flow Control Performance Standard I r-VCL ! Number of Orifices/Restrictions 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 111105 1 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL , r Live Storage Volume Depth Volume Factor of Safety Number of Acres Served Number of Lots 1 Dam Safety Regulations (Washington State Department of Ecology) Reservoir Volume above natural grade Depth of Reservoir above natural grade Facility Summary Sheet Sketch All detention, infiltration and water quality facilities must (11 "x 17" reduced size plan sheets may be sed) u t include a detailed sketch. _1 J J J J J J J I 1,1,05 •J 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 2 J i J KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL Water Quality: Type/Number of water quality facilities/BMPs: L biofiltration swale (regular/wet/ or continuous inflow) large) combined detention/wetpond large) above sand filter (basic or large) sand filter, linear (basic or sand filter vault (basic or (wetpond portion basic or large) sand bed depth (inches) combined detention/wetvault stormwater wetland filter strip storm filter flow dispersion wetpond (basic or large) farm management plan landscape management plan oil/water separator (baffle or coalescing plate) Liner? catch basin inserts: Manufacturer pre -settling pond pre -settling structure: Manufacturer wetvault Is facility Lined? If so, what marker is used high flow bypass structure (e.g., flow-splitter catch basin) source controls Design Information Water Quality design flow ' L� (c "0. Z �� S Water Quality treated volume (sandfilter) Water Quality storage volume (wetpool) Facility Summary Sheet Sketch - 5EE F0u.CWi" PPv6 2005 Surface Water Design Manual I 111105 J 1 i :+t r. 'x P-t PG 27 uo ii a J W „L Al ` 19 u 7-� C °�Q cc C O O Q L C m a C �Rt aV M W to r ��.. d LL� ym 0 ELL6 W ♦, E Ol N N O0LL O L � (0 C ca co Y ujgo W 'a m m w o c m C' Ifm J c.i m y�ia£� O12 ng 0 ++ a a) E I Oo`o�N �`�° EU .. m� `O m's U) �c�c)amLLtL t MS -IAN 1 s 4�3 J bEdl[7�w 5 �. 'qS AAM1H DWI:) S 3AV ist _ r f `O . —.. MS3 end ist$ - c } Hd rn CL `' y a a U' - — . e% i l - 0, Wl I�.:r ,L_� �•� � Y_�_�� - 1r'„- y :.F �.; � � r +r!' fir.-; � y� • M1+� �iLf.: Y•� r .. �;;� -44 _ .� >r x i•i;, , i ; ;IF­ Mor -F Ap '4 � ?;fir. �• -`�, �- "�•'• �� ='� �� '�,. �• ate:'.- •:��-- '`�. .il� � 'w� .ih* •. �� ''� � is F - • '"-l•. -�'�3i..ss�� ' ,! +;� �:' s : i •r '� • mil. ;2x� s - •!•�-�}' � 5��f "' �9� ' 1iE���� �eE.1=� - 'ram-- its. ate. - _ ' "re ??�'s +4•� , •yr b-z . . %__t4 x _ 11i� - - -:mil•' � `�71 `�. 1' �' _ :: � ISM �i 3.2.2 KCRTS/RUNOFF FILES METHOD— GEjNERA77NG 77ME SERIES TABLE 3.2.2.B EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN SCS SOIL TYPES AND KCRTS SOIL. TYPES SCS Soil Type SCS Hydrologic Soil Group KCRTS Soil Notes Group Alderwood (AgB, AgC, AgD) (C Till Arents, Alderwood Material (AmB, AmC) -t Fill' Arents, Everett Material (An) B Outwash 1 Beausite (BeC, BeD, BeF) C Till 2 Bellingham (Bh) D Till 3 Briscot (Br) D Till 3 Buckley (Bu) D Till 4 Earlmont (Ea) D Till 3 Edgewick (Ed) C Till 3 EverettEvB. EvC, EvD, EwC A/B Outwash 1 Indianola (InC, InA, InD) A Outwash 1 Kitsap (KpB, KpC, KpD) C Till Klaus (KsC) C Outwash 1 Neilton (NeC) A Outwash 1 Newberg (Ng) B Till 3 Nooksack (Nk) C TAL 3 Norma (No) (D) (Till) 3 Orcas (Or) D Wetland Oridia (Os) D Till 3 Ovall (OvC, OvD, OvF) C Till 2 Plichuck (Pc) C Till 3 Puget (Pu) D Till 3 Puyallup (Py) B Till 3 Ragnar (RaC, RaD, RaC, RaE) B Outwash 1 Renton (Re) D Till 3 Salal (Sa) C Till 3 Sammamish (Sh) D Till 3 Seattle (Sk) D Wetland Shalcar (Sm) D Till 3 Si (Sn) C Till 3 Snohomish (So, Sr) D Till 3 Sultan (Su) C Till 3 Tukwila (Tu) D Till 3 Woodinville (Wo) D Till 3 Notes: 1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth (a5 fleet) by glacial till, they should be treated as till soils. 2. These are bedrock soils, but calibration of HSPF by King County DNRP shows bedrock soils to have similar hydrologic response to till soils. 3. These are alluvial soils, some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study, these soils should be treated as till soils. 4. Buckley soils are formed on the low -permeability Osceola mudflow. Hydrologic response is assumed to be similar to that of till soils. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual I/24/2005 3-25 SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS I FIGURE 3.2.2.A RAINFALL REGIONS AND REGIONAL SCALE FACTORS ST 1.1 ST 1.1 Rainfall F Regi0onal E-1 Incorporateu Hreau —co River/Lakep Major Roadp 0 1 /24/2005 ST 1.0/ ST1.0 ianq LA0.9 LA1.0 LA1.2 3-22 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1 I 1 1 1 Page 33 SITE STATISTICS Site soils — per SCS mapping — AgB, alderwood Group C till & Norma Group D Till Regional Scale Factor — Seatac 1.0 Total Site Area = 2.69 Acres Element Existing (acres) Pro osed acres House & Church 0.09 Ac Concrete Pad & walks 0.04 Gravel Parkin Orn erv. Fraction) 0.15 House exist to stay) 0.02 0.02 Ac Prop Church & Walk (NPGIS) 0.08 Prop Parkin Lot GIS) 0.34 Subtotal Impervious 0.30 0.44 Wetland 0.70 0.70 Till Grass 1.53 1.55 Gravel Parkinpervious fraction) 0.16 Subtotal Till Grass 1.69 Totals 2.69 2.69 From KCRTS ouput (see attached) Q 100 Existing = 0.547 cfs Q100 Developed = 0.583 cfs Therefore, the net increase is 0.036 cfs which is less than the 0.1 efs limit for flow control exemption I I 1. Note: Model is for entire onsite natural (threshold) discharge area and therefore meets KCSWM 1.2.2.2.1 G on pg 1-23. I I I j 25 Lin I T Z x i -J - dd `� _ 2Q da x GIs z LOA , � f ��d d d0 �ga3 1�'� r 1 4• r coo I x 4 I ` II e. r� 1 c� 1 tri rr 1 A N N 1 � J cn tA E v w � m� O 1 W k1 ..s' N A 'D0 ice/ tO tp � IT4 O Z / n - !! M rn \ 1 u / � D \ � new \\ c o = am oho \ z `� m cD•ivcn n f \\ m _ X \ \ xd n_z N 8 C z m 00 Paused - KCRTS 1 King County Runoff Time Series Program �1 Version 6.00 All files will be read/written in the Working Directory Working Di.rectory:C:,kc-swdm,output KCRTS Command { J CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series j Project Location : Sea-Tac Computing Series predev.tsf Regional Scale Factor 1.00 Data Type Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:',KC SWDM',KC_DATAIISTTG60R.rnf 8 Till Grass 1.69 acres Scaling Yr: 8 Loading Time Series File:C:',KC SWDM'�KC DATA,STWL60R.rnf 8 Wetland 0.70 acres Adding Yr: 8 Loading Time Series File:C:'�KC_SVDM-,KC-DATA-�STE160R.mnf 8 iImpervious 0.30 acres Adding Yr: 8 Total Area .� 2.69 acres Peak Discharge: 0.547 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File: predev.tsf 8 Time Series Computed KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Prajayct Location Sea-Tac Computing samiaa Dev.tsE Regional Scale Factor 1.00 Data Type Reduced Crmating Hourly Timm Series FiIC Loading Time Series File: C:'\KC-SWDM\KC DATA-,STTG60R.rnf 8 Ti.il Grass 1.s5 acres Scaling Yr: 8 Loading Time Scrims File: C:',KC SWDM\KC-DATA\STWL60R.rnf 8 'Wetland 0.70 acres Adding Yr: 8 Loading Time Series File:C:-,KC_SWDMNKC DATA,STE260R.rnf 8 Impervious 0.44 acres Adding Yr: 8 Total Area 2.69 acres Peak Discharge: 0,584 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:Dev.tsf 8 Time Series Computed ,; Start [ ® ® ( inbox - Microsoft .,. ® AutoCAD 2002 - [C... I Paused - KCRTS `?% Pausi __j �.J 3� Help / Files - KCRTS Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File: rP edev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates --- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.321 3 2/09/01 2.00 0.154 6 1/05/02 16:00 0.378 2 2/27/03 7.00 0.106 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.139 7 10/28/04 16:00 0.234 4 1/18/06 16 00 0.214 5 11/24/06 3:00 0.547 1 1/09/08 6 00 Computed Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:dev.tsf Project Location:5ea Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates --- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.342 3 2/09/01 2:00 0.177 6 1/05/02 16:00 0.403 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.139 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.176 7 10/28/04 16:00 0.258 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.237 5 11/24/06 3:00 0.583 1 1/09/08 6.00 (Computed Peaks -Flow Frequency Analysis------- - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob i Perod DS 1 100 0.490 <--� 2 25 00 0.960 0.321 3 10.00 0.900 0.234 4 5.00 0.800 0.214 5 3-00 0.667 0.154 6 2.00 0.500 0.139 7 1 30 0.231 0.106 8 1.10 0.091 0.491 90.00 0.960 -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob Period 0.583 1 100.00 0.990 �- 0.403 2 2S_00 0.960 0.342 3 10.00 0.900 0.256 4 5.00 0-800 0.237 5 3-00 0.667 0.177 6 2.00 0.500 0.176 7 1-30 0.231 0.139 8 1.10 0-091 0.523 50.00 0.980 Start 0 0 [a ®®% A 0 Inbox Micros... ® Auto CAD 2002... I KCRTS !e. Help / Files - .� 1�11�w �Az- A4� fLciLldEp (9-1-D% 2 WyEu ca �11PER V AE4 = 0.49 4c p c n_V ,4 0.1.4i l - 13. prL." M o"Tr�C CUGCTt?Orzw7� dF%&M= b. 12(, CFL. =Qw U�E LJ 0b 5t14114 WC-ys ML-14-0 �I,�',.C_ 610 i F A\ O PET" 11j, -De- if U Itow UcAvc.i'fil Uwq = _q —tv q A tv4 VZ 0, 2`- 0.2 !;�ps 6. 9S' V cvq='vcs(a-q- low Aa,k: 8142:y2- Slxoa7f(3xa,�7� o.q�y Z° SIOESLDPFOW7Lr&V=3 L= 5¢o Vwq = .54o X D,25 - I3-5 LT- 14114 5co4c.c Leu&,tw. A-07,n; Sw.4Lc LSu&D+ - ,LOOT 14ELE-0 4a7 --::) Us 13 S LF `iroouoc &Z,005 AUcE CCWAcrq fbv� 257(L- 4 00 TL lev Seca.., 4. tI.2 foo4ILq= o:m>l Zs-gX Q=D,-713 �= M a-u"LA6-J h = b. 6 3 - Cotr 3-t7cOu � CA(U'-+ C, 44#tiE,, LcuuDIM I,1 �AA?ss _ x I. rs�►z xb 1 ( 4� r q X � x � Z � 0 - ell 9 Z_ 9.71 CFs 6.b3 4 s' A=(4-sx0,9)�(,SXa.$)= 3 Eup = 9.5-4 24 I.5-%' _ -7, (,4 �- _ Alt p = 3/7,66 = O, 392 N Q N O (D) O LLJx�LL- U c-) Zn J W 0�' wW(y0- M NLL_0(�0W=0 X J w w W J (If0 ,o 0 U-)U OLO �000 7 _l N C I I p� 1 I J L 0pl _ V W J cn C.D C 3�:z J ow J •— cn cn ■� m w 1` Cr- W 0005 ly- LL J M M X Jw\zJW W <Nm0:� •� CD 'a 1 a (D CD 4.- ) 0 Z LL ILL U-)❑ 00i p r-� U) 4N i12 Lip J = C =S N w F- = U F m a w r WTI w k < w n sc c: x U 3j 100 o r s n u L,I�3 � O UZULU In Z W li Y7 W Q �fl' \Y L w 6�5 T Z L �a 41 r ^ U z�2��S LL v C ge �wRZ:;: { Q 9 w � J hr) m 40 / g — xU / VZ:w m 4D�4 m V) 8 EL LD a FOd Y $ , w w ' 0 1 ,� • c S � 4� �t ,1 x pA r r tt x aHP air- Project Location Sea-Tac Computing Series vq. tsf onal Scale Factor 1 00 Data Type Historic t=ng 15-minute Time Series File Loading Tian Series File:C:\KC SYDMNKC_DATA\S1TG15H.rmf 50 Grass 0 36 acres Scaling Yr:50 Loading Time Series File: C:\KC SVDhNXC_DATA�5T'T15H.rnf SO rvious 0 44 acres Adding Yr:SO Total Area 0.80 acres Discharge: 1.02 CFS at 11:46 on Dec 29 in 1996 Storing Time Series File:wq.tsf 50 Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command N Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Dischargs curva:wq tsf Flow Frequency Analysis LogPearsom III Coefficients Time Series File:vq.tsf Mean- -0.593 StdDeva 0.169 Project Location:Sea-Tac Skew- 1.3B6 Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:vq.Pks 1 02 1 12/29/96 11:45 0.154 49 1.03 0.031 0.496 4 10/04/97 14:15 0.142 50 1.01 0.011 puled Peaks 0.883 101.00 0.990 — puted Peaks 0.713 50.01 0.980 �— puted Peaks 0.573 25.00 0.960 puted Peaks 0.425 10.00 0.900 puted Peaks 0.400 8.00 O.B75 puted Peaks 0.334 5.00 O.B00 puted Peaks 0.235 2.00 9.500 ^• puled Peaks 0.191 1.30 0.231 6.4.1 WL•TPONDS —BASIC AND LARGE— METHODS OFANALI SZ- ti FIGURE 6.4.1.A PRECIPITATION FOR MEAN ANNUAL STORM IN INCHES (FEET) ST 1.1 0.54" (0.045`) C Incorporat -.c= River/Lake Major Roa NOTE: Areas ear - _ _ _��......_ .. r....... ......... �..,... , inches unless rainfall data is available for the location of interest 24 The mean annual storm is a conceptual stone found by dividing the annual preclxtarun by the total number of stone events per year ST 1.0 ST 1.0/ . w ..., LA 1.0 LA 1.2 V..J%m (U.uw) (0.047') r result, generates large amounts of runoff. For this application, till soil types include Buckley and Jbedrock soils, and alluvial and outwash soils that have a seasonally high water table or are underlain at a shallow depth (less than 5 feet) by glacial till. U_S_ Soil Conservation Service (SCS) hydrologic soil groups that are classified as till soils include a few B, most C, and all D soils. See Chapter 3 for classification of specific SCS soil types. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 6-71 1 /24/2005 -J V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Per KCRTS 15 minute time step computations listed in the bioswale design section, the 100-year peak flow is 0.883 cfs and the 25-year flow is 0.713 cfs. Capacity analysis of the proposed piping is as follows: An 8" cmp (n=0.013) @0.6% slope yieldsl.0 cfs 1.0 cfs>0.88 cfs: o.k. Full flow design velocity is 3.3 fps, which exceeds minimum required velocity of 3 fps A 12" cmp (n=0.013) @ 0.3% slope yields 2.0 cfs 2.0 cfs>0.88 cfs: o.k. Full flow design velocity is 3.5 fps, which exceeds minimum required velocity of 3 fps See Section IV for bioswale conveyaiice capacity I I I j J j 1 CAM a -I_Og I OL,-I- J��u.. lDaS 164 (gyp ���� Zs � Uwr�e� ut��+G loua���,vi� nor . 71�r STU A c-Fs Ar4,v Imp = o . se CD4,a geaA�r NO !� P� 1-��[��, ,o� Z�S j�L.Su�::x,-�►�syet�-� P ? S CfS !i?U �t . FLOW, TL-�, (.�uU I�µc.c f� �-`�� ulal;�MrG- i'iS I I.2. 4, ; 1-�, A p-p- CC4 uc �A l� L 414 "- Sts, $ " VI. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS (NA) VII. OTHER PERMITS (N.A.) VIII. EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN % e5 LV PPS Esc Plan Analysis and Design Erosion Control BMP's shall consist of a rock construction entrance, silt fencing, sensitive area fencing and Construction Limits. See plan sheets for details. Construction Phasing — In order to prevent erosion and trap sediments within the project site, the following BMPs will be used approximately as shown on the ESC plan and in the order described below: • Clearing limits will be marked by fencing or other means on the ground. • One of the driveway areas will be constructed and graveled immediately and the rocked construction entrance shall be installed. • Runoff will not be allowed to concentrate and no water will be allowed to point discharge onto the slopes. • Silt fencing will be placed along slope contours at the down -slope limit of clearing. • Temporary cover measures will be used as required per the ESC notes for wet -season construction. • Sediment retention and flow control are not necessary given the size and nature of the project. • Construction Schedule — The project construction will initiate in the fall of 2008' and will take approximately three to 6 months to complete. SWPPS Project Description- The project scope consists of replacing an existing church and concrete pad with a new church and new paved parking lot surfaces. After demolition, replaced paving and a new building will be constructed. The site is located at the 29276 Military Road South in the City of Federal Way, Washington. The site consists of 2.69 acres. Currently, 0.46 acres of impervious area exist on the site, and the developed condition will have 0.44 acres of impervious area. A Geotechnical Report is peiidim,. Site soils are classified by SCS as glacial till. An existing Class 2 wetland has been delineated and extends over most of the east V2 of the property. A major stream lies directly east of the east property line. There are no indications of closed depressions on the property. A Modification Waiver request has been submitted and approved to omit Frontage Improvements. There are no indications of closed depressions on the property. Site design criteria are based on the 2005 King County Storm Drainage Manual. The anticipated volumes of grading cut and fill that are proposed are as follows: Cut < 100 CY Fill < 2000 CY Erosion Specialist. The project civil engineer may be contacted in the event that construction observation is required. Contact information is as follows: Civil Engineer: Sound Consultants, LLC 6484-48th Ave SW Seattle, WA 98136 Contact: Hal Hagenson, P.E. Ph: 206-93 8-6168 Email: H.Hagenson@Comcast.net Existing Site Conditions: Currently, the existing site is occupied by an existing church and concrete pad. The site consists of 2.69 acres. Currently, 0.46 acres of impervious area exist on the site. Site soils are classified by SCS as glacial till. An existing Class 2 wetland has been delineated and extends over most of the east V? of the property. A major stream lies directly east of the east property line. There are no indications of closed depressions on the property. Adjacent Areas: There are immediate adjacent areas, including streams, wetlands, residential areas and roads that might be affected by the construction project. The downstream drainage leading from the site to an existing stream, which eventually discharges to the Lower Green River Basin. Critical Areas- There is a major stream and wetland on the site and within the site vicinity that could be impacted by the development. Extensive analysis of the stream and reported downstream flooding has been completed and the 100-year flood plain elevation has been established onsite at elevation 413. The minimum building finish floor elevation is proposed to be 2 above that elevation (415). Soil: A Geotechnical Report is pending. Site soils are classified by SCS as Alderwood series glacial till. Potential Erosion Problem areas: The site is flat with very low erosion potential. Twelve Elements — Refer to the attached erosion and sedimentation control plan for each BMP and its location. Construction Phasing: In order to prevent erosion and trap sediments within the project site, the following BMPs will be used approximately as shown on the ESC plan and in the order described below: • Clearing limits will be marked by fencing or other means on the ground. • One of the driveway areas will be constructed and graveled immediately and the rocked construction entrance shall be installed. • Runoff will not be allowed to concentrate and no water will be allowed to point discharge onto the slopes. Silt fencing will be placed along slope contours at the down -slope limit of clearing. • Sediment retention and flow control are not necessary given the size and nature of the project. Construction Schedule: The project construction will initiate in the fall of 2008' and will take approximately three to 6 months to complete. Financial Ownership Responsibilities: Bond information is provided in the TIR. Engineering Calculations: There are no required calculations. Completed by: BMP Implementation Title: r Date: 5evwop a plan for implementing each BMP. Describe the steps necessary to implement the BMP (i.e., any construction or design), the schedule for completing those steps (fist dates), and the person(s)ms ible for implementation. E I Scheduled Milestone and Person BMPs Description of Action(s) Completion Date(s) Responsible for Required for Action Im emerrtation Good 1. -IW IS R k10 9C 2�s Housekeeping c v AL 2. VC�CA�(lON'12iMMaaa�_ 3 Preventive 1. IZEPLALE 6 R.D91.i N C. Tb. 2. I�t .; 'r ill 5;� I.Dft43 Maintenance 3. AL Spill 1. Prevention and 2- Emergency Cleanup P 3. Inspections 1. 1 2. 3. I StE D M SC—c i-16N x, _1 2005 Surface Water Design Manual (CSWPP Fonnns) Page 1 1 /1/2005 j I I Ul) C) CD CL (n -W m IL U) �� } ) CL o 0CD w CL x ai lu 0 cc mw 0 CL E 0 0 k ca 2 0 (D CD co CL U 0 — CL CD J2 4) -a L=ID 0 CUD U) 0 ■ CL 0 j to 0 CL ca CJ CD E 0 0 CL 0 LL IL 0) L- 0 CD U) C13 U) 0 (D D 0 :2 0 U) .D cD 0 co Z CD cli � � § . , kk � a � , ] k . 0 / b | a :3 '! � 0 | � & � § CO ] 2 2 E \ _ E / U- E ' _ � J k_ c a E E k gL / k C13 � ■ � o E co � � ��Li | k m � -j j m � r � : � I � � � 2 E 2 / ID � 2 E , $ . . t � § / ' ) z a ^ . o 2�W2 i o k ] \ 0� . 0 s a � CL � ) w E . 2$ m kc0 § \ 2 2 2 E E J 2 � � R§ E m eu § v k //. , - 19 £6 �� ( / = fu : (m ■� I § � � 2 _ 2 D � � ~ rL § & 27 %o k k�EL �k C � �E % ®®C3�2 a -i E in�� kk ■ e«� a a) - ' ; } / i § & ƒ � U- a $ v k 2 � � k R � 2 k I I I E A j � § 04 g � � / U) ! k | � k \_ M ) ■ � / . E � k m � . o C c , _ f, 2 . ■ / k \ m§ . ' 2 u ` r a L � M� � k kk E k 0£ LL 0 ] iL =4 IL$ @ m 0� Cl) ° @ 0 0 � E 7 � / m 2 ¢ � ca co E § $ § CL c 2 k In§ 2 ca § § k / � o O $ § £ 8 §_ « 3 2 g Co w Ec 2© 2 Q m n k k k 2 k W IL � k � 1 I w Completed by: Pollution Prevention Team rdle: Date: Responsible Official: Title: Team Leader: Office Phone: Cell Phone # Pager #: Responsibilities: Title: Office Phone: Pager#: Cell Phone: Responsibilities: (2) Title: Office Phone: Pager #: Cell Phone #: Responsibilities: 2005 Surface Water Design Manual (CSWPP Forms) 1/24/2005 Page 1 Storage or Solid Waste and Food Wastes (Including Cooking Grease) This activity applies to you if you store solid wastes including both food and non-food wastes outdoors. This typically refers to garbage dumpsters, other outdoor waste containers such as cooking grease barrels or containers, and any stockpiled garbage. Improper storage of non-food solid wastes can allow toxic compounds, oils and greases, metals, nutrients, and suspended solids to enter stonnwater runoff. Stormwater runoff from food waste storage areas may be contaminated with oils and greases, nutrients, and suspended solids if waste containers are leaking, are not covered, or are too small to contain the amount of waste generated. If you store .dangerous wastes you must follow specific regulations outlined by the Washington State Department of Ecology. The following BMPs, or equivalent measures, methods, or practices, are required if you are engaged in storage of solid wastes.or food wastes: Cover storage containers with leak proof lids or some other means. If waste is not in containers, cover all waste piles (plastic tarps are acceptable coverage) and prevent stormwater run-on and run-off with a berm or similar method. The waste containers or piles must be covered h - except w en an use - See BUT Info Sheet 5 in Chapter 5 for information on containei elit and run-on prevention and BUT Info Sheet 3 for information on � covering options. — T� IV C� January 2005 When transferring cooking oil/grease to outside containers from kitchens, cover the container with a tight lid during transport and clean up any spills immediately. Use drip pans or absorbent materials whenever grease containers are emptied by vacuum trucks or other means. Grease cannot be left on the ground. Clean up spills immediately. Collected grease must be properly disposed of as garbage. King County Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Manual Storage or Solid Waste and Food Wastes (continued) Required Routine Maintenance: • Check storage containers as needed for leaks and to ensure that lids are on tightly. Replace any that are leaking, corroded, or otherwise deteriorating. • Sweep and clean the storage area as needed if it is paved. Do not hose down the area to a storm drain. 1 • Dispose of rinse and wash water from cleaning your containers into a sanitary sewer according to health department requirements. ��See BMP Info Sheet 2 in Chapter 5 for information on disposal options. y - For more information or assistance in implementing these best management practices, contact the King County Department ofNatural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division at 206-296-1900. ` Reader Note: The above requirements are the minimum required BWs. If these BNIPs fail to prevent discharges to the storm drainage system, you will be asked to take additional measures to correct the continued pollution discharges. I I 1 I I I ' King County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual January 2005 j IX. BOND QUANTITIES WORK SHEET, RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND SKETCH, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT 1 n 1 7 1 1 I i i i J i CITY OF Federal Way PUBLIC Woms DEPARTMENT BOND QUANTITIES WORRSHEET Project Name: Midway Samoan Assembly -of God Church Date: June 9, 2008 Project No.: 07-101136-00-UP By: Sound Consultnats, LLC Site Address: 29279 Milita Road South Federal Way, Wa Fill in those items which pertain to this project and return to the Public Works Department SITE STABILIZATION/ EROSION CONTROL Quarry Spalls - TN 75.00 Seeding/Mulch Acre 3,000.00 Silt Fence LF 4.00 Netting Jute Mesh SY 13.00 Sediment Pond Standpipe EA 200.00 Sensitive Area Fencing LF 3.00 Catch basin inserts EA 70.00 ROAD CONSTRUCTION Clearing & Grubbing Sawcutting Excavation & Embankment AC Pavement CSTC Cement Concrete Curb/Gutter Extruded Asphalt Curb Concrete Sidewalk Concrete driveway approach Monument in case Adjust ex. monument to grade Adjust ex. cb to grade DRAINAGE PIPE 6" Pipe 8" Pipe 12" Pipe 18" Pipe 24" Pipe 36" Pipe 48" Pipe 54" Pipe 60" Pipe 72" Pipe CATCH BASINS Inlet & Grate CB Type I & Grate CB Type II 48" & Grate CB Type II 54" & Grate CB Type II 60" & Grate CB Type II 72" & Grate CB Type II 84" & Grate CB Type II 96" & Grate Round solid locking lid Abandon exiting cb Public Roadway Private On -Site Improvements I Improvements $ 98 7,350 $ .5 $1,500 600 $2,400 475 1 $1 425 Subtotal 12 675 LS LF CY TN TN LF LF SY SY EA EA EA Bid Estimate 1.30 18.00 70.00 20.00 15.00 5.00 25.00 45.00 155.00 330.00 500.00 800, 175 325 575 130 LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 12.00 28.00 44.00 44.00 58.00 101.00 94.00 117.00 143.00 235.00 475.00 900.00 1,900.00 2,000.00 3,200.00 5,000.00 9,100.00 Bid Estimate 360.00 325.00 35 167 c:\documents and settings\owner\my documents\hc\job nos\sound con\2006\2006023 midway samoan\engineering\bond quantites worksheet 6-9- 08.doc CITY OF Federal Way RETENTION/DETENTION CONTROL Pond Excavation & Spillway Restrictor/Separator Vault Gravel Access Road Rip Rap Outfall Protection Bollards Fencing (around pond) Infiltration Trench w/12" Perf Flow Spreader Trash Racks WATER QUALITY Bioswale Wetvault Stormfilter Vault Stormwater wetland Sand Filter Catch basin inserts Oil/Water Separator High Flow Bypass RETAINING WALLS & STRUCTURES Retaining Walls Bridges TRAFFIC & LIGHTING Signalization Channelization Signs Streetlights (City Center) Streetlights (Standard) RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPING Street Trees Sod Shrubs (City Center) Tree Grates (City Center) Signature CY 7.00 EA 750.00 EA Bid Estimate LF 15.00 CY 17.00 EA 500.00 LF 12.00 LF 18.00 LF 20.00 EA 200.00 EA Bid Estimate EA Bid Estimate EA Bid Estimate EA Bid Estimate EA Bid Estimate EA 800.00 EA Bid Estimate EA Bid Estimate SF 23.00 $ LS Bid Estimate LS Bid Estimate LS Bid Estimate EA 100.00 EA 5,000.00 EA 3,000.00 $ EA 300.00 �^ SY 10.00 EA 6.00 EA 700.00 $ $ $ From Private On -Site Improvements Section (Pg 1) Subtotal "A" Subtotal "B" $ 64,928 Firm Name Telephone Number r THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WILL BE coMFLETED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WA Y PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT; I Public Roadway Improvements (Subtotal "A'): $ Private Erosion/Sedimentation Control (Subtotal "B'J: $ Subtotal ("A" + „B'j: $ j CONTINGENCY (20%) $ TOTAL BOND AMOUNT $ c:\documents and settings\owner\my documents\hc\job nos\sound con\2006\2006023 midway samoan\engineed ng\bond quantites worksheet 6-9- 08.doc I 1 i After Recording return to: DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT j IN CONSIDERATION of the approved King County permit for application No. relating to real property described as follows: J The undersigned as Grantor(s), declares that the above described property is hereby subject to an easement for a system of stormwater facilities and BMPs, and hereby dedicates, covenants and agrees as follows: 1. King County shall have the right to ingress and egress over those portions not contained in Exhibit "A" to access such easement area for inspection of and to reasonably monitor the performance, operational flows, or defects in accordance with and [as presented in ¢ King County Code Section 9.04.120]. �j 2. If King County determines that maintenance or repair work is required to be done to the system, the Director of the Water and Land Resources Division of the King County J J J Department of Natural Resources shall give notice of the specific maintenance and/or repair work required pursuant to K.C.0 9.04.120. The Director shall also set a reasonable time in which such work is to be completed by the Grantor(s), its heirs or assigns. If the above required maintenance or repair is not completed with the time set by the Director, the County may perform the required maintenance or repair. Written notice will be sent to the Grantor(s) stating the County's intention to perform such maintenance. Maintenance work will not commence until at least seven (7) days after such notice is mailed. If, within the sole discretion of the Water and Land Resources Division Director, there exists an imminent or present danger, said seven (7) day notice period will be waived and maintenance and/or repair work will begin immediately. 3. If at any time King County reasonably determines that any existing drainage facility or flow control BMP creates any of the conditions listed in K.C.C. 9.04.130 and herein incorporated by reference, the Water and Land Resources Division Director may take measures specified therein. 4. The Grantor(s) shall assume all responsibility for the cost of any maintenance and for repairs to the system. Such responsibility shall include reimbursement to the County within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the invoice for any such work performed. Overdue payments will require payment of interest at the current legal rate as liquidated damages. If legal action ensues, the prevailing party is entitled to costs or fees 5. The Grantor(s) is (are) hereby required to obtain written approval from the Water and Land Resources Division Director of the King County Department of Natural Resources prior to filling, piping, cutting, or removing vegetation (except in routine landscape maintenance) in open vegetated drainage facilities (such as swales, channels, ditches, ponds, etc.), or performing any alterations or modifications to the drainage facilities contained within said drainage easement. Any notice or consent required to be given or otherwise provided for by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective upon personal delivery, or three (3) days after mailing by Certified Mail, return receipt requested. 2 6. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and supercedes all prior discussions, negotiations, and all agreements whatsoever whether oral or written. This covenant is intended to protect the value and desirability of the real property described above, and shall insure to the benefit of all the citizens of King County, and shall be binding on all heirs, successors and assigns. OWNER OWNER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING )ss. On this day personally appeared before me: to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein stated. Given under my hand and official seal this day of , 20 Printed name Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires 3 X. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL I I 11 i i HrrLAIDiX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO.5 - CATCH BASINS Maintenance Defect or Problem Component Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When General Trash & Debris Trash or debris of more than Maintenance Is performed % cubic foot which (Includes Sediment No Trash or debris located is located immediately in front Of the catch basin opening or is blocking capacity of the basin b immediately in front of etch basin Y more than 10% opening. Trash or debris (in the basin) that exceeds '/3 depth from the bottom of basin the No trash or debris in the catch to invert the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. basin. Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe blocking Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or more than 73 of its height debris. Dead animals or vegetation that could generate No dead animals or vegetation odors that could cause complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). present within the catch basin. Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in volume. No condition present which would attract or support the breeding of 5trurtslre Damage iq 9 Comer of frame extends more than insects or rodents. Frame and/or Top Slab V4 inch past curb face into the street (If applicable). Frame is even with curb. Tap slab has holes larger than 2 square inches Or cracks wider than Y- inch (intent is to make Top slab is free of holes and cracks. sure all material is running into basin). Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., separation of more than Y. inch of the frame from Frame is sitting flush on top slab_ the top slab. Cracks in Basin Walls/Bottom Cracks wider than % inch and longer than 3 feet, any evidence of soil particles entering catch Basin replaced or re Paned to design basin through cracks, or maintenance person standards. judges that structure is unsound. Cracks wider than % inch and longer than i foot at the joint of any Inletfoutlet pipe or any No cracks more than '/A inch wide at evidence of soil particles entering catch basin the feint of inlet/outlet pipe. through cracks. Settlement/ Misalignment Basin has settled more than 1 inch or has rotated more than 2 inches out of Basin replaced or r P repaired to design Fire Hazard alignment. Presence of chemicals such as natural gas, oil and gasoline. s standards. No flammable chemicals present. Vegetation Vegetation growing across and blockingmore than 10% of the basin opening. vegetation blocking opening to basin. Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe joints that is more than 6 inches tall and less than 6 inches No vegetation or root growth aparL present Pollution Nonflammable chemicals of more than / cubic foot per three feet of basin length. No #lution P❑ Present other than Basin Cover Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only in Surface film.Catch partially place. Any open catch basin requires maintenance Catch basin cover is closed Locking Mechanism Not Working Mechanism cannot be opened by on maintenance erson with p Mechanism opens with proper tools. proper toads. Bolts into frame have less than % inch of thread. Cover Difficult to Remove One maintenance person cannot remove lid after applying 80 lbs. of lift: intent Cover can be removed by one is keep cover from seaiing off access to maintenance. maintenance person. Ladder Ladder Rungs Unsafe Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs misalignment, rust, cracks, or sharp edges, Ladder meets design standards and allows maintenance person safe access. 1/24/2oo5 A-6 2005 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix A APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE. AND WQ FACILITIES NO.5 - CATCH BASINS Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is performed Metal Grates (If Applicable) Unsafe Grate Opening Grate with opening wider than 7/s inch. Grate opening meets design standards. Trash and Debris Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% Grate free of trash and debris. of grate surface. Damaged or Missing. Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. Grate is in place and meets design standards. NO.6 - DEBRIS BARRIERS (E.G., TRASH RACKS) Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is Performed. General Trash and Debris Trash or debris that is plugging more than 20% Barrier clear to receive capacity of the openings in the barrier. flow. Metal Damaged/Missing Bars are bent out of shape more than 3 inches. Bars in place with no bends more Bars. than'/+ inch. Bars are missing or entire barrier missing. Bars in place according to design. Bars are loose and rust is causing 50°% Repair or replace barrier to design deterioration to any part of barrier. standards. NO.7 - ENERGY DISSIPATERS Maintenance Component Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed. External- Rock Pad Missing or Moved Rock Only one layer of rock exists above native soil in area five square feet or larger, or any exposure of native soIL Replace rocks to design standards. Dispersion Trench Pipe Plugged with Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the design depth. Pipe cleaned/flushed so that it matches design. Not Discharging Water Properly Visual evidence of water discharging at concentrated points along trench (normal condition is a "sheet flow' of water along trench). Intent is to prevent erosion damage. Trench must be redesigned or rebuilt to standards. Perforations Plugged. Over % of perforations in pipe are plugged with debris and sediment_ Clean or replace perforated pipe. Water Flows Out Top of "Distributor" Catch Basin. Maintenance person observes water flowing out during any storm less than the design storm or its causing or appears likely to cause damage. Facility must be rebuilt or redesigned to standards. Receiving Area Over- Saturated Water in receiving area is causing or has potential of causing landslide problems. No danger of landslides. Intemal• Manhole/Chamber Worn or Damaged Post. Baffles, Side of Chamber Structure dissipating flow deteriorates to % or original size or any concentrated wom spot exceeding one square foot which would make Replace structure to design standards. structure unsound. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix A 1 /24/2005 A-7 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE. AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 10 -- CONVEYANCE PIPES AND DITCHES Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Component Results Expected When Pipes & Debris Accumulated sediment that Maintenance is Performed ex n diameter of the pipe. seeds 20 /o of the Pipe cleaned of all sediment and Vegetation debris. Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through pipes. All vegetation removed so water Damaged Protective coating is damaged; flows freely through pipes. rust is causing more than 50% deterioration to any part of Pipe repaired or replaced. pipe. Any dent that decreases the cross section area of pipe by more then 20%. Pipe repaired or replaced. Open Ditches Trash & Debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. Trash and debris cleared from Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the ditches_ design depth. Ditch cleaned/flushed of all sediment and debris so that it Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free matches design. movement of water through ditches. Water flows freely through ditches. Erosion Damage to Slopes See "Detention Ponds" Table No. 1 "Detention See Ponds" Table No. 1 Rock Lining Out of Place or Missing (If Maintenance person can see native soil beneath the rock lining. Replace rocks to design standards. Applicable]. NO.11- GROUNDS (LANDSCAPING) Maintenance Defect or Problem Component Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When General Weeds Weeds growing in more than 20% the Maintenance is Performed (Nonpoisonous, not noxious) of landscaped area (trees and shrubs and Y}- Weeds present in less than 5% of the landscaped area. Safety Hazard Any presence of poison ivy or other vegetation. Poisonous No poisonous vegetation present in Trash or Litter Paper, cans, bottles, totaling more than 1 cubic foot within a landscaped area (frees landscaped area_ Area clear of litter.. and shrubs only) of 1,000 square feet. Trees and Shrubs Damaged Limbs or parts of trees or shrubs that are split or broken which affect more than 25% of the total foliage of the tree or Trees and shrubs with less than 5% of total foliage with split or broken shrub. limbs. Trees or shrubs that have been blown down or knocked over. Tree or shrub in place free of injury - Trees or shrubs which are not adequately supported or are leaning Tree or shrub in place and over, causing exposure of the roots. adequately supported; remove any dead or diseased trees. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix A A_9 1 /24/2005 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 13 - BASIC BIOFILTRATION SWALE Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Recommended Maintenance to Component Correct Problem Swale Section Sediment Sediment depth exceeds 2 inches Remove sediment deposits on grass Accumulation on treatment area of the bioswale. Grass When finished, swale should be level from side to side and drain freely toward outlet. There should be no areas of standing water once inflow has ceased. Standing Water When water stands in the swale between storms Any of the following may apply: and does not drain freely. remove sediment or trash blockages, improve grade from head to foot of swale, remove clogged check dams, add underdrains or convert to a wet biofiltration swale. Constant Baseflow When small quantities of water continually flow Add a low -flow pea -gravel drain the through the swale, even when it has been dry for length of the swale or bypass the weeks, and an eroded, muddy channel has baseflow around the swale. formed in the swale bottom. Poor Vegetation When grass is sparse or bare or eroded patches Determine why grass growth is poor Coverage occur in more than 10% of the swale bottom. and correct that condition. Re -plant with plugs of grass from the upper slope: plant in the swale bottom at 8-inch intervals, or re -seed into loosened, fertile soil. Defective Vegetation When the grass becomes excessively tall Mow vegetation or remove nuisance (greater than 10 inches) or when nuisance weeds vegetation so that flow not impeded. and other vegetation starts to take over. Grass should be mowed to a height of 3 to 4 inches. Remove grass clippings. Excessive Shading Grass growth is poor because sunlight does not If possible, trim back over -hanging reach swale. limbs, remove brushy vegetation on adjacent slopes. Trash and Debris Trash and debris accumulated in the bioswale. Remove trash and debris from Accumulation bioswale. Erosion/Scouring Eroded or scoured swale bottom due to flow For ruts or bare areas less than 12 channelization, or higher flows. inches wide, repair the damaged area by filling with crushed gravel. The grass will creep in over the rock in time. If bare areas are large, generally greater than 12 inches wide, the swale should be re -graded and re -seeded. For smaller bare areas, overseed when bare spots are evident, or take plugs of grass from the upper slope and plant in the swale bottom at 8-inch intervals. Inlet/Oudet Sediment and Debris Inlet/outlet areas clogged with sediment and/or Remove material so that there is no debris. clogging or blockage in the inlet and outlet area. Flow Spreader Concentrated Flow Flow spreader uneven or clogged so that flows Level the spreader and clean so that are not uniformly distributed through entire swale flows are spread evenly over entire width. swale width. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix A 1/24/2005 A-11 Flummol . , Nov 30 06 04:31 p Jim Harnson Level One Dowristream Analysis as Described u� KOSVvDM - PRELIMINARY Prepared by Lary ESteward PB 24738 SE N irmrmont Dive ismquah, Wash 99027 Email iestew rd _ h l m Cell 425-755-996Z office.425-392-6111 Site at 29276 South MiiitarY Road Federal Way, Washington - --__ — 44,Levek 18atysrts iga-rough, qualitative .. --. __ .pear•�ti�Z:3-afKES�II?BM-otk� survey 4daich dowwMm System leaving the site. Thomas Guide page 745 Cl King County Sensitive Areas Folio MaP 6 This project is using PROCESS IV The site slopes slightly down to *e east where there is a floadplain where there was wat+4r shout 6 inches deep near the east property line. There is a very large wetland that 292D0. This wetland has low is shows an. parcels labeled as Z9279, 79Z5Q, 2900d and anuary growing deciduous trees and water at the time ofthe 5e1d inspsaa had been 13,2006. The weather at the time of field reran was saghtly rain y. Thisrecord was 33 days in .preceded by a near record of 27 or 2S days of prccipitadon. (The 1953). The.gnaund was saturated - IVTIitary Wa The class 2 w�lan�d is fed by a IV' (estimate) culvert drat nuns under,,th to a �� by y from the west sale to t he east side. The 0Avert terminates (according Dan 1t-iee) in and open Type 11 storm drain manhole (f & of )°the atch to s'da of ��y way. There is a ditch of sorts that runs tT mph trackless wetland that is ,300 .i o 400 feet wide m an east west direction anti about 900 feet long to the north. There was,a(-channel is fairly regular so it appears manmade stream naming about 10 feat wide and 2 feet deep on the Mask side of this property and the wetland. It appears (see 1"�00, on City of Federal Way Map 703 NE. The stream $PPears to dr-; the weld atft= and in- extreme rains it may �Wpr to'flood the-.' - wetWuL(along with the 18" culvert previously mentioned. The limit of the level 1 field analysis is'/4 mile I did not see any Capacity restraints on the day. that I was there. There was a dmirusge problem though. 'mere was same water over a short drivCWAy sag curve m the Camelot Square Mobile 110me Perk new the above mentioned stream: I- did rat :water in the skirting of the Milem I drove throu� ��ar�rd The water in the er with my u�c Uk but a small low car would have had water stream flows toward Interstate 5 ' freeway. See City of Federal Way Map 703 NE. Note: This parcel and the other parcels merrtioned appear to be dump sites for old carpets and other debris. While there is obviously a wetland close at hand it does not show an the critical areas map. The-meashows up on the Sensitive areas folio as a unclassi rm fied stream which is the lowest class identified_ Looking further into the Sensitive areas folio and going down the list Lower Green River Basin No Wetlands (there is one though) No 100 year delineated lloodplain There is a unclassified stream skirfmg the edge of the property No erosion hazard area No landslide hazard area No Seismic hazard area No coal mine hazard area Check @ City of Federal 'Wary Public works on Jan 2p,2006 No k wwn downstream problems Federal way Zoning Map 13 November 2003 fifth addition Wetland is known as 4-24447 Class 2 Stream is categorized as Major T 3 Modified per Process IV Nov 30 06 04:33p Jim Hamson !Es-r-CD 3talp po* Dr CVBwm Ptqwv pd* ftmd cavPjA OVwLa.nd=rk /V clivopwapam Pdvab Thict R end D Tank i onwatypmpww, Mft4�sncwpbK Al sbm anmr Latwei Nov 30 06 04:34p Jim Harnson 30 45 Be 17 s 9 s 49, a 9WC.r ,e swS 2 Q F w n+ ■oa o L � r-rfa �tr T swOM m6e Y ,a s5 as sy EL Q � >rrr - AMI 20 � �t ao g qt 7- 7 5 32 6 f 22 i3 r =xr sZxe .rs-a i 2 23 S. 29 5T. 9ry i A."pox IMT74A 2* 1W 64 1:•QA fS (AWOOONW) 25 7 36 3S 34 3S z ab 32 - aoa ■ 2 S 29 NO Sr. �.f 4 ® za 27 25 29 30 31 I't w w5 " Y�o•..,ro.i " � Frei ! ;3 cl L�• i arot re. as Q Q a E? �y 1 3 b sY D WL DC IESTIL % T� - L-6 ':ssa. WM= MA twos 7 .t January 8, 2007 Ij City of Federal Way DCDS 33325-e Ave South P.O Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 ND CONSULTANTS = KIRKLAND OFFICE SEATTLE OFFICE 10509 NE 12& Place 6484 — 4e Avenue SW Kirkland, WA 98034 Seattle, WA 98136 425-765-5053 Ph. 206-938-6168 Ph. 425-823-5313 Fax 206-938-7645 Fax e-mail; jJvh(dlverizon.net e-mail; H.Hagenson®comcastcom Re: Midway Samoan Assembly of Cod Church File No. 06-100629-00-SE & 06-100628-UP Mr. Shawn Wells, P.E. We are writing to request a modification to the Right of Way improvements required as part of the Process IV Conditional Use Permit application for the subject project. We ask that the proposed project be exempt from providing any Right of Way improvements to Military Road South. The basis of our request is as follows: 1. The ROW improvements would likely push the project over the stormwater flow control exemption threshold, thereby forcing the project to install a storm detention system and impose a difficult financial burden on this small project. 2. The proposed project will not generate significant AM/PM Peak hour trips which might otherwise trigger improvements. Large meetings are generally restricted to weekends and off-peak hours. 3. It is our understanding that the proponent would be willing to sign a no protest agreement to any future transportation Local Improvement District for the ultimate improvements to Military Road South. Thank you for you consideration in this matter Sincerely, Hal Hagenson, P.E. Associate CITY OF �. Federal May 21, 2007 Mr. Hal Hagenson, P.E. Sound Consultants, LLC 6484 48th Ave SW Seattle, WA 98136 CITY HALL 33325 Sth Avenue South y Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: permit No. 07-101475,-UU-SAI. MIDWAYSAMOANASSEMBLYOF GOD CHURCH 29276 Military Rd S - Road Madifrcation Response Dear Mr. Hagenson: This letter responds to your request dated January 8, 2007, to waive required street improvements along Military Road South associated with your proposed development. After evaluating the existing and proposed conditions, review of Federal Way City Code (FWCC) provisions (Sections 22-1474, 22-1477, 22-1496), and direction provided by the City Council, the Public Works Department hereby modifies the requirements for street improvements based on the following: FWCC Section _ 22-1477 — Modifications, deferments and waivers: This code section allows the -Public Works Department to grant a request to modify, defer, or waive the required street improvements only after consideration of four specific reasons. The reason most applicable here is contained in FWCC 22- 1477(3) "Proper vertical or horizontal alignments cannot be determined because the existing streets do not have correct alignments," and (4), `The required improvement is part of a larger project that has been scheduled for construction in the City's adopted Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program." Military Road South is classified as an arterial street correspondina to Federal Way Roadwav J Section "It". This roadway section requires a 44-foot wide paved street with vertical curbs, six- foot planter strip, eight -foot sidewalk, three-foot utility strip, street lighting, and street trees all within a 78-foot right -of --way. 9 This road section is also listed in the City's adopted Capital Improvement Plan for 2009-2020 (adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, Table III-19) with a project description requiring five lanes. This project will require a minimum of 100 feet of right -of -Way to meet the necessary needs of the proposed improvements. The existing right-of-way width on Military Road South across the frontage of the property is 60 feet. This width is inadequate based on the planned road sections listed above. Therefore, based on FWCC 22-1474(c), the City will require the following right-of-way dedication and land set aside: L:\CSDC\DOCS\SAVE\14829952052. DOC �J Mr. Hal Hagenson, P.E. Sound Consultants, LLC RE: Permit No. 07-101475-00-SM 9 May 21, 2007 Page Two ■ Dedicate a nine -Foot wide portion of the subject property parallel to the right-of-way and extending across the entire property frontage for right-of-way purposes. • Set aside an 11-foot wide portion of the subject property parallel to the right-of-way portion described above, extending across the entire property frontage. This area shall be set aside as a "Tract X", which is reserved for future right-of-way. The City will provide a Tract X agreement for signature approvals prior to the issuance of a building permit. Y After evaluating the existing conditions along Military Road South, review of Federal Way City Code provisions (Sections 22-1496, 22-1477), and the direction provided by the City Council, the Public Works Department hereby modifies the requiremenrs for street improvements i applicable to your permit application, as follows: • No physical improvements to Military. Road South are required. The applicant shall i sign a No Protest to Local Improvement District Agreement prior to the issuance of a building permit. The conditions of this right-of-way modification will be applicable for one year from the date of this letter. If a building permit is not issued within the one-year time limit, the right-of-way modification will be void, and a new request for modification must be submitted. If you have any questions, please contact Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer, at (253) 835-2731. I J J Sincerely, Ken Miller, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director KM:SRW:cb cc: fflhn, Arpletan, P.E., Development S2n;ices Manager David Lee, Planning Sarady Long, Traffic Project File/SRW Day File L:\CSDC\DOCS\SAVE\14829952052.DOC