Loading...
11-101527Fil,,E 1�kCITY OF Federal Way May 20, 2011 Brant Schweikl, P.E. Schweikl and Associates, PLLC 1945 South 375h Street Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Re: File #11-101527-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY Aja's Coffee & Steve's Car Wash, 803 South 348`h Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Schweikl: Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development Review Committee (DRC) held May 12, 2011. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting was helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted. This letter summarizes comments given to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC. The members who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff from the City's Planning and Building Divisions and Public Works Department, and representatives from Lakehaven Utility District and South King Fire and Rescue. Some sections of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) and relevant information handouts are enclosed with this letter. Please be advised, this letter does not represent all applicable codes. In preparing your formal application, please refer to the complete FWRC and other relevant codes for all additional requirements that may apply to your project. The key contact for your project is Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641, rebecca.chapin@cityoffederalway.com. For specific technical questions about your project, please contact the appropriate DRC representative as listed below. Otherwise, any general questions about the preapplication and permitting process can be referred to your key contact. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed 300 sq ft drive thru coffee shop, 2,000 sq ft carwash station, and two-story 625 sq. ft. car wash pay station with upstairs office building, and associated site work. The two residential structures on site are to be demolished as part of the proposal. MAJOR ISSUES Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and information submitted for preapplication review. These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in the plans. These major issues only represent comments that the DRC consider most significant to your project and do not include the majority of the comments provided. The major issues section is only provided as a means to highlight critical requirements or issues. Please be sure to read the entire department comments made in the next section of this letter. Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 2 o Planning Division 1. Potential wetland buffer intrusions are not fully reflected on the submitted plans and may impact proposed development. A wetland report must be submitted prior to formal land use submittal. 2. The proposal does not meet setback requirements. 3. The proposed retaining walls exceed height requirements. o Public Works Development Services Division This project will be required to meet the standards outlined in the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the City's addendum to that manual. Public Works Traffic Division 1. A Transportation Concurrency permit is required per FWRC Chapter 19.90. 2. A trip generation study to determine the number of trips generated by the proposed development is required per FWRC 19.135.050. 3. A Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) is required to assess other significant project impacts such as queuing and safety analysis per FWRC 19.135.050. 4. Street frontage improvements and right-of-way dedication of 10' are required along the property frontage on South 348'h Street per FWRC 19.I35.040. 5. The current proposal needs to meet access management standards per FWRC 19.135.280. South King Fire and Rescue The proposal for automatic fire sprinklers in lieu of a hydrant cannot be approved. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the preapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions, please contact the representative listed for that section. PLANNING DIVISION (Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641, rebecca.chapin@cityoffederalway.com) 1. Zoning, Use, and Review Process — Zoning for the subject property is Commercial Enterprise (CE). The CE zone permits car wash, office, and fast food restaurant uses pursuant to FWRC 19.240.050 (car wash), 19.240.080 (office), and 19.240.110 (fast food restaurant). The subject site is located within a one year wellhead protection zone and the proposed car wash is a potential groundwater contamination source. As such, the proposal is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review. The project may also require SEPA review if the improvements intrude into a critical area buffer and/or requires more than 500 cubic yards of fill/grade. When SEPA review is required, a project must be reviewed through Process III Review, Project Approval. Under Process III, the Director of Community and Economic Development makes a written decision on the application based on criteria listed under FWRC 19.60.050. Be advised that any intrusion into critical area buffers may require review under Use Process IV, Hearing Examiner, and requires a public hearing conducted by the Hearing Examiner. Development Requirement Checklist and Master Land Use Application are enclosed along with applicable code sections. Following submittal of a complete application, the city will process the 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 3 land use application within 120 days, unless additional information is needed. If that is the case, the review clock will be off until the information is submitted and verified. Building permits are issued after land use approval is granted. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). As noted previously, SEPA review is required. The site is within a one year wellhead capture zone critical area and car washes are a moderate risk to potential groundwater contamination, which triggers SEPA review. In addition, any improvements or demolition in the wetland buffer is subject to SEPA review. Finally, if the proposed landfills and/or excavations, requiring the retaining wall, are more than 500 cubic yards, the project requires SEPA review. A SEPA checklist must be submitted and reviewed prior to the city issuing an environmental threshold determination. All property owners within 300 feet of the site are notified of that decision. The notification includes a 14-day comment period. SEPA review must be concluded before the site plan approval and any other applicable land use review may be granted. 4. Application Fees — The proposal to develop the project requires the following land use fees: • Process III review $2,404.00 Process IV review (if applicable) $3,961.50 • SEPA review $951.50 The above -mentioned fees are based on the 2011 fee schedule, which is subject to change. Please contact a Development Specialist at 253-835-2607 before submitting to confirm application fees. 5. Public Notice — Process III (and Process IV) applications and SEPA determinations require public notices. Within 14 days of issuing the Letter of Complete Application and SEPA Determination, a Notice of Application and Optional DNS will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property, posted on the subject property, and placed on the City's three designated notice boards. The applicant is required to submit one set of stamped mailing envelopes to persons receiving tax statements within 300 feet of the subject property (Process IV review requires a second set of mailing envelopes to notify property owners of the public hearing). The City's GIS Division provides this service for a nominal fee or the applicant may provide their own mailing envelopes via King County Assessor records or a Title Company. Refer to the enclosed mailing labels bulletin for further information. 6. Critical Areas — The subject site appears to be located within 200 feet of a regulated Category I wetland. In a January 17, 2008 technical memo, the City's wetland consultant Grette Associates LLC, provided peer review of two wetland reports prepared by John Comis Associates (JCA) dated February 21, 2005, and February 18, 2006. In addition, Grette reviewed a Technical Memo prepared by Otak, the City's former environmental consultant, dated September 26, 2006. Grette summarized differing points of view between the two reports, and found that the Comis report did not meet all of the city code requirements at the time. The memo prepared by Grette did confirm that wetlands located adjacent to the property are Category I wetlands with 200-foot buffers and that the wetlands are 145 to 195 feet from the SW corner of the property. All of the above -mentioned wetland reports and technical memos are enclosed. Submitted plans depict what appears to be a wetland buffer area of 4,868 square feet (along the west property line) and an intrusion into the wetland buffer along the southern property line. Through Process III, the Director of Community and Economic Development may reduce the required wetland buffer area. Both FWRC 19.175.040(2) wetland buffer averaging and FWRC 19.175.040(5) 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 4 wetland buffer reduction can be considered only if existing conditions are such that the required standard buffer exists in a permanently altered state which does not provide any buffer function or the conditions are such that the wetland has been permanently impacted by adjacent development activity. Any wetland buffer intrusion must be reviewed by Process IV, pursuant to FWRC 19.175.040(6) Modification. In order to clarify the extent of critical area constraints on the subject property, it is recommended that a wetland report be submitted for city review prior to formal land use submittal. Based on the evaluation of the wetland Wort we can then determine what land use process will be required. Wellhead Protection — The subject site is also located within a one year wellhead protection zone as designated by Lakehaven Utility District. A Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement — Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas (enclosed) must be submitted with the formal application. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will then review the Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement and asses all potential impacts to the city's groundwater resources to decide whether hazardous materials will be used, stored, or disposed of in connection with the proposal. Car wash facilities must also provide documentation of compliance with Department of Ecology standards set forth in the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Chapter 173-216. 7. Key Development Regulations — All site improvements must comply with the applicable FWRC development regulations. The following general regulations apply to the proposal. (a) Required Yard/Building Setbacks —Structural setbacks for the proposed project vary based on use and adjacent zoning. CE zoning is located to the east and south, Office Park (OP) zoning is to the north across South 34$'' Street and single family residential (RS35.0) is to the west. Use North OP zoning South CE zoning East CE zoning West RS zoning Car Wash setback 20 ft 15 ft 15 ft 20 ft Office/Retail setback 5 ft 5 ft 5 ft 20 ft Fast Food Restaurant setback 5 ft 5 ft 5 ft 20 ft The proposed layout does not meet these standards and could not be permitted, unless setbacks are modified through the variance process. Meeting Follow-up: The city does have a variance process. The proposal must meet criteria_ set forth in FWRC 19.45.030. Variances area roved using Process IV review. The Hearin Examiner will hold a public hearing and then decide upon the application. (b) Maximum Building Height — the height of buildings in the CE zone varies by use based on FWRC. However, according to special regulations and notes for the proposed uses, building heights may not exceed 30 feet Above Average Building Elevation (AABE) when located within 100 feet of a residential zoning district. This affects the entire site, all of which is within 100 feet of the residential zone to the west. No building heights were provided with this preapplication site plan. A formal application must demonstrate how the height requirement is met. 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 5 (c) Parking — Parking requirements from the CE zone charts are reflected below: Use Parking Requirements Car Wash Case by case basis Office/Retail 1 parking stall for each 300 square feet of gross floor area. (625 sq ft building /300 sq ft= 3 parking stalls) Fast Food Restaurant 1 parking stall for each 80 square feet of gross floor area (300 sq ft espresso stand / 80 sq ft = 4 parking stalls) The preapplication site plan depicted six parking stalls. Based on the parking requirements above, there is an insufficient amount of parking spaces for this site. Meeting Follow-up — Modification to parking requirements. Per FWRC 19.130.080, a decrease in the required number of parking spaces may be permitted if a thorough parking study documents that fewer parking spaces will be adequate to fully serve the uses. 8. Rockeries, Retaining Walls, and Fencing — Rockeries, retaining walls, and any proposed fencing must be shown on site and landscape plans, as well as on civil engineering plans. Per FWRC 19.120.120, the height of rockeries and retaining walls associated with commercial development is limited to six feet. Retaining walls and rockeries shall be set back a minimum of three feet from adjacent public rights -of -way, and where retaining walls are terraced; there shall be a minimum five feet distance between terraces to accommodate landscaping and its maintenance. Walls that are visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent property shall be composed of brick, rock, or other textured/patterned styles as approved by the planning and public works directors. Please note that the existing retaining wall does not appear to meet these standards. Meeting Follow-up — The director can approve modifications to the retaining wall requirements if the applicant can demonstrate the criteria in FWRC 19.120.050 have been met. 9. Tree and Vegetation Retention — A tree/vegetation retention plan as required under FWRC 19.120.040(2) must be submitted with the Process III application and incorporated into clearing and grading drawings (FWRC 19.120.040(1)). The plan must be prepared by a certified arborist or certified landscape architect and should include applicable information provided in the Clearing, Grading, and Tree and Vegetation Retention section of the FWRC. These standards are intended to promote building and planning practices that are consist with natural topography, soils and vegetative features; preserve and enhance the City's physical and aesthetic character; and establish and maintain the urban tree canopy and its benefits. The standards require each development maintains a tree unit density. The minimum tree density in CE zones is 20 tree units per acre. The subject property's density would be 12 tree units (20 tree units x 0.57 acres = 11.4 units). A tree unit is a value assigned to existing trees retained on the property. The larger the tree, the greater value it is assigned (e.g. an existing tree measuring between 18 inches to 24 inches qualifies as 2.5 tree units). Required tree density can be composed of retained trees and replacement plantings per FWRC 19.120.130. (Note: Required landscaping trees may be counted in tree density.) The tree/vegetation retention plan must clearly show where the 12 tree units are to be located. 10. Landscaping— The Process III application must include a preliminary landscape plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, in accordance with the landscape requirements contained in FWRC 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 6 Chapter 19.125 "Outdoors, Yards, and Landscaping. " Following are the key landscape requirements for the project. (a) Perimeter Landscape Buffers — FWRC 19.125.060(9), CE, requires Type III perimeter landscaping a minimum of five feet in width along all property lines; unless adjacent to a residential zone as in the case to the west property line; which requires 15 feet of Type I solid screen landscaping. In addition, enhanced perimeter landscaping must be provided to screen parking stalls from the right-of-way and residential zones. A preliminary landscape plan must depict these requirements. Type III landscaping consists of a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees, large shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height at the time of planting, and groundcover; spaced to provide a visual buffer creating a partial visual separation. (b) Interior Parking Lot Landscaping — Twenty square feet of interior lot landscaping per parking space must be provided in accordance with FWRC 19.125.070. Parking lot landscaping is to break up large areas of impervious surfaces, mitigate adverse impacts created by vehicle use areas, facilitate the movement of traffic, and improve the physical appearance of vehicle use areas. The square footage of interior lot landscaping must be listed on the landscape plan, and the interior landscape areas used for this calculation must be identified on the plan. (c) Parking Area Screening —As noted above, parking areas abutting South 348th Street and the adjacent residential zone must be screened with either a three -foot -tall berm installed within the perimeter landscaping, architectural features, or substantial plantings added to the landscaping. The landscape plan should contain a cross section to show how this requirement is met. 11. Community Design Guidelines —Projects subject to Process III review must comply with the provisions of FWRC Chapter 19.115, "Community Design Guidelines". It is the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate how all applicable design guidelines have been satisfied. 12. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) — FWRC 19.115.010(2) CPTED, requires minimum standards for design review to reduce the rate of crime associated with persons and property, thus providing for the highest standards of public safety. CPTED principles are: 1) natural surveillance; 2) access control; and 3) ownership. The enclosed CPTED checklist must be completed and submitted with the formal application. 13. Garbage/Recycling—No facilities for garbage and recycling are shown. FWRC 19.125.150 requires that storage areas for garbage and recycling receptacles be required for all new commercial developments. The formal application must note the specific size, design, location, and screening of garbage receptacles as required by FWRC 19.125.150 and 19.125.040. Locations for the recycling and garbage facilities, and any fencing or screening details, must be depicted on the formal site plan. See Public Works comments below for additional information. CODE ENFORCEMENT (Greg Vause, 253-835-2632, greg.vause@cityoffederalway.com) Initial review of the preapplication packet revealed land surface modifications have been performed on the site, including potential work within a regulated wetland buffer. This is a violation of the zoning code and code enforcement was notified and opened a violation case (file #11-101819-00-VO). There were 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 7 three corrective options presented. (1) Bring site back to original condition, (2) apply for land use permits that would have allowed clearing and grading of the site, including within a wetland buffer, or (3) obtain permits to develop the site as proposed. As discussed in the meeting, you will have 30 days from the date of this letter to follow-up and develop a plan for bringing this site into compliance. PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION (Ann Dower, 253-835-2732, ann.dower@cityoffederalway.com) Land Use Issues — Stormwater Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the 2009 KCSWDM. This project meets the requirements for a Full Drainage Review. At the time of land use site plan submittal, a preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR), addressing the relevance of the project to the eight core and five special requirements of the KCSWDM will be required. A Level 1 downstream analysis shall also be provided in the preliminary TIR. The City has 1" = 100', five-foot contour planimetric maps that may be used for basin analysis. 2. The project lies within a Conservation flow control area, thus the applicant must design the flow control facility to meet this performance criteria. The project also lies within an Enhanced Basic Water Quality Area. Water Quality Treatment shall be designed to meet the treatment criteria of the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Menu. In addition to the KCSWDM, our initial review suggests that FWRC Section 19.30.120, "Nonconforming Water Quality Improvements" applies to this site. Specifically, the following items are applicable: l.a. Redevelopment which involves the creation or addition of impervious surfaces having an area of 5,000 square feet or more; 1.b. Redevelopment which involves the construction or replacement of a building footprint or other structure having a surface area of 5,000 square feet or more, or which involves the expansion of a building footprint or other structure by 5,000 square feet of surface area or more; 1.c. Redevelopment which involves the repair or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of an impervious surface, when such redevelopment is not part of a routine maintenance activity; 1.d. Redevelopment which involves the collection and/or concentration of surface and/or stormwater runoff from a drainage area of 5,000 square feet or more; Le. Redevelopment which contains or directly discharges to a floodplain, stream, lake, wetland, or closed depression, groundwater recharge area, or other water quality sensitive area determined by the Public Works Director, based on a written map, policy, water quality monitoring data or plan in existence or implemented by the Director prior to submission of a redevelopment application which is determined to trigger application of this subsection, or based on information developed during review of a particular redevelopment application; 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 8 l.f. Redevelopment which involves a change in use, and the changed use has a potential to release a new pollutant(s) to surface water systems within the City. For the purposes of this subsection, "new pollutant(s)" means a pollutant that was not discharged at that location immediately prior to the change in use, as well as a pollutant that was discharged in less quantities immediately prior to the change in use; l.g. Redevelopment, other than normal maintenance or other than the tenant improvements, but including any increase in gross floor area, in any one consecutive 12-month period which exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value (whichever is greater) of the structure or improvement being redeveloped. The applicant may provide an appraisal of the improvement. The appraisal must be from a source acceptable to the City. The Director may require the applicant to provide an appraisal from a second source acceptable to the City if the assessed valuation appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. If more than one appraisal is provided by the applicant or required by the City, the greater of the two amounts shall be used. For purposes of this determining value under this section, improvements required pursuant to FWRC Sections 19.30.090 (nonconforming development), 19.30.110 (street/sidewalk improvements), 19.30.120 (nonconforming water quality improvements) and 19.135.030 (street/sidewalk improvements) shall not be counted towards the 50 percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection; 1.h. Redevelopment of property which drains or discharges to a receiving water that has a documented water quality problem, as determined by the Public Works Director based on a map, plan, water quality monitoring data or a written policy in existence or implemented by the Director prior to submission of a redevelopment application determined to trigger application of this subsection, where the Director determines that the redevelopment requires additional specific controls to address the documented water quality problem. Therefore, water quality treatment will be required for the entire site, including new and existing pollution generating impervious surfaces. Treatment options must be selected from the (Enhanced Basic or Basic) Water Quality Menu provided in the KCSWDM. If infiltration is proposed, soil logs prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer or septic designer must be provided to verify infiltration suitability. 5. Detention and water quality facilities for private commercial developments within the City Center Core may be placed underground. 6. Detention and water quality facilities for commercial developments outside the City Center Core must be above ground (i.e. open pond). Underground facilities are allowed only with approval from the City of Federal Way Stormwater Management Division. 7. Show the proposed location and dimensions of the detention and water quality facilities on the preliminary plans. 8. If more than one acre will be disturbed during construction, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit may be required. Information regarding this permit can be obtained from the Washington State Department of Ecology at httc;//www.ecy.wa.gory//programslsea/pac/index.html, or by calling 360-407-6437. 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 9 9. If work is to be done below the ordinary high water mark, a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) permit may be required. Information regarding this permit can be obtained from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, at http://www.wa.pov/wdfw/hLbipmagglt►tm or by calling the office of Regulator Assistance at 360-407-7037. Right -of -Way Improvements See the Traffic Division comments from Sarady Long, Sr. Transportation Planning Engineer, for traffic related items. 2. If dedication of additional right-of-way is required to install street frontage improvements, the dedication shall be conveyed to the City through a statutory warranty deed. The dedicated area must have clear title prior to recording. 3. All stormwater treatment and detention requirements outlined above will be applied to new impervious area within the public right-of-way. Building Permit Issues l . Engineered plans are required for clearing, grading, road construction, and utility work. Plans must be reviewed and approved by the City. Engineering review fees are 824.50 for the first 12 hours of review, and $68.00 per hour for additional review time. A final TIR shall be prepared for the project and submitted with the engineering plans. Both the TIR and the plans will require the signature/seal of a professional engineer registered/licensed in the State of Washington. In addition to engineering approval, short plats and subdivisions are required to obtain a separate permit for grading. Details and fees may be obtained from the Federal Way Building Department. 3. The Federal Way Development Standards Manual (including standard detail drawings, standard notes, and engineering checklists) is available on the City's website at www.ciiyoffederalway.com to assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and TIR. 4. The applicant shall provide a geotechnical report that addresses design pavement thickness for the roadways. Bonding is required for all street improvements and temporary erosion and sediment control measures associated with the project. The bond amount shall be 120 percent of the estimated costs of the improvements. An administrative fee deposit will need to accompany the bond to cover any possible legal fees in the event the bond must be called. Upon completion of the installation of the improvements, and final approval of the Public Works Inspector, the bond will be reduced to 30 percent of the original amount and held for a two-year maintenance period. The developer will be responsible for the maintenance of all storm drainage facilities (including the detention and water quality facilities) and street systems during the two-year maintenance period. During that time, the Public Works Inspector will make periodic visits to the site to ensure the developer's compliance with the maintenance requirements. Upon satisfactory completion of the two-year maintenance period, the remainder of the bond will be released. Maintenance for public roads and subdivision drainage facilities then become the responsibility of the City. Maintenance for II-101527 DGcID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 10 private roads and drainage facilities, including short plats, remain the responsibility of the individual property owners. 7. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans, the vertical datum block shall include the phrase "DATUM: N.G.V.D.-29" or "DATUM: K.C.A.S.," on all sheets where vertical elevations are called out. 8. Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" paper. All final approved drawings shall be drafted/plotted on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" mylar sheet with permanent black ink. Site plans shall be drawn at a scale of 1" = 20', or larger. Architectural scales are not permitted on engineering plans. 9. Provide cut and fill quantities on the clearing and grading plan. Erosion control measures, per Appendix D, 2009 KCSWDM, must be shown on the engineering plans. 10. The site plan shall show the location of any existing and proposed utilities in the areas affected by construction. PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION (Sarady Long, 253-835-2743, sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com) Transportation Concurrency Analysis (FWRC 19.90) 1. A concurrency permit is required for this development project. The concurrency analysis will determine if adequate roadway capacity exists during the weekday PM peak period to accommodate the proposed development project. Staff is unable to determine trip generation of the proposed development using the Institute of Transportation Engineers ITE's Trip Generation. Therefore, the applicant's traffic engineer needs to submit a trip generation study to determine the number of trips generated by the proposed development. At a minimum, the trip generation study shall include three (3) studies for similar land use and settings approved by the Traffic Division. The methodology for determining the trip generation shall be based upon the guidelines established in the most recent edition of the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. The estimated fee for the concurrency permit application is $1,584.50 (11- 50 Trips). The fee may change based on the new weekday PM peak hour trips as identified in the trip generation study. The concurrency applicant fee must be paid in full at the time the concurrency permit application is submitted with land use application. The applicant has the option of having an independent traffic engineer prepare the concurrency analysis consistent with City procedures; however, the fee remains the same. Transportation Impact Fees (TIF) (FWRC 19.91) Traffic impact fee for the project will be calculated based on the fee schedule in effect at the time a building permit application is filed and must be paid prior to permit issuance. 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 11 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) (FWRC 19.135) A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by an engineer licensed in the state of Washington is required for this development project. The engineer should contact the Traffic Division for a scoping sheet in the initial stages of their study. The TIA should include the following analysis: A specialized land use trip generation study. Queuing analysis of access points for morning, evening, and Saturday peak hours. Street Frontage Improvements (FWRC 19.135) The applicant/owner would be expected to construct street improvements consistent with the planned roadway cross -sections as shown in Map III-6 of the FWCP and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) shown as Table III-19 (FWRC 19.135.040). Based on the materials submitted, staff conducted a limited analysis to determine the required street improvements. The applicant would be expected to construct improvements on the following streets to the City's planned roadway cross -sections: South 348`h Street is a Principal Minor Arterial Collector planned as a Type "A" street, consisting of a 90' street with curb and gutter, 6' planter strips with street trees, 8' sidewalks, and street lights in a 120' right-of-way (ROW). Assuming a symmetrical cross section, 10' ROW dedication and half street improvements are required as measured from the street centerline. 3. The applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director to modify, defer, or waive the required street improvements (FWRC 19.135.070). Information about right-of-way modification requests is available through the Public Works Development Services Division. Please note that these modification requests have a nominal review fee currently at $91.50. 4. Tapers and transitions beyond the project frontage may be required as deemed necessary for safety purposes, taper rate shall be WS^2/60 or as directed by the Public Works Director. Access Management (FWRC 19.135) The proposed driveway is within the eastbound left turn storage pocket and would interfere with the 951' percentile queue lengths from an existing traffic control device at South 348b Street and 9d' Avenue South intersection. As such, this driveway access will be restricted to right -in and right -out only. PUBLIC WORKS - SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING DIVISION (Rob Van Orsow, 253-835-2770, robv@cityoffederalway.com) Solid Waste & Recycling Design Considerations Solid waste and recycling design considerations include: ■ Adequate space allocation for interior and exterior garbage, recycling, food waste, waste oil, yard debris, hazardous waste, or biohazard collection containers. Minimum recycling space allocation is established by FWRC 19.125.150. s For basic solid waste and recycling needs within a single enclosure, clear interior dimensions measuring 10' deep by 20' across are recommended, along with a two -door swing -open or roll - open gate that spans the front width of the enclosure. When gate doors are opened, no structure or 11-101527 DocID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 12 hardware should remain above grade across the enclosure opening. Gate pins/holes are preferred for holding gates in closed and open positions to ease service access and maximize the life of gate hardware. Plan for user access to interior waste and recycling storage areas/containers, and to exterior containers screened by enclosure(s). Plan for unobstructed, safe enclosure ingress and egress for service vehicles, directly in line with enclosure openings. Allow appropriate turning radii for service vehicles, and minimize potential `blind spots' during ingress and egress. Consider landscaping, setbacks and screening requirements [based on FWRC Section 19.125.040 (4) & (5)]. Help with many design parameters related to service access is available via the City's contracted solid waste services provider, Waste Management. Contact: John Davis — Senior Route Manager at 206-786- 4530 (cell). BUILDING DIVISION (Fernando Fernandez, 253-835-2623, fernando.frnandez@cityoffederalway.com) Codes Adopted At the time of submittal, those regulations which are currently in effect shall be applicable to all project plans and specifications. The City of Federal Way has adopted the following: International Building Code, 2009 edition Washington Administrative Code 5150 and Federal Way Revised Code 3.15.010 International Mechanical Code, 2009 edition (WAC 51-52 and FWRC 13.30.010 Uniform Plumbing Code, 2009 edition (WAC 51-56 & WAC 51-57 and FWRC 13.25.030) International Fire Code, 2009 edition (WAC 51 -54 and FWRC 13.55.020) Accessibility Code ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 (WAC 51-50) Washington State Energy Code, 2009 edition (WAC 51-11 and FWRC 13-15-010) International Residential Code, 2009 edition (WAC 51-51 and FWRC 13-15-030) National Electric Code (NEC), 2008 edition (Note: The NEC is on a different cycle than the International and Uniform Codes. See WAC 296-46B for specific dates for the adoption of updated versions of the electrical code.) Site -Specific Requirements 1. Site was recently graded, cleared, and filled with material. Retaining walls greater than 4 feet were installed. 2. No building construction type given. All structures assumed to be of type VB construction. The setback proposed from property line for the car wash building (group B) and pay station/office building (group B) is 0 feet. Therefore, all exterior walls shall have a fire -resistance rating not less than 1-hour (IBC 602.1, Table 602). The required fire -resistance rating of exterior walls with a fire separation distance of less than or equal to 10 feet shall be rated for exposure to fire from both sides (IBC 705.5). No eaves or projections may overhang into the adjacent property. 11-101527 Doe 1D 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 13 3. Based on the number of parking shown, at least one parking stall shall be van accessible (IBC 1106.5). 4. Accessible routes within the site shall be provided from public transportation stops; accessible parking; accessible passenger loading zones; and public streets or sidewalks to the accessible building entrance served (IBC 1104.1). 5. Sites, buildings, structures, facilities, elements and spaces, temporary or permanent, shall be accessible to persons with physical disabilities (IBC 1103.1). This includes the 2-story structure and the coffee shop. 6. Plumbing fixtures shall be located in each building or conveniently in a building adjacent thereto on the same property (IBC 2902.2.1). 7. Provide a minimum of one unisex toilet facility on site (IBC section 2903, amended). Permits Site previously graded and filled without permit, per City records. Installation of retaining walls, grade and fill, clearing of trees, or other land surface modifications regardless of height within sensitive areas or their buffers (FWRC 13.15.020) requires permits. Separate demolition permit required for each structure (two residential structures total). A separate building permit is required for each structure (three total) and for the retaining walls. Mechanical and plumbing work may be part of the permit or may be filed separately. Submit with a completed application for each building permit, five complete sets of plans. A separate electrical permit is required for any new or altered electrical work. When structural calculations are required for any given permit submittal, provide two sets of structural calculations prepared by a professional engineer, registered in the state of Washington. Due to the recent fill of the site, a geotechnical investigation (soils report) prepared by a qualified registered design professional licensed in the state of Washington is required (IBC 1803) for all structures requiring a building permit. Submit two copies per application for building permit. Provide copies of water and sewer availability certificates. At submittal provide two sets of energy code calculations, including lighting budget showing compliance with the Washington State Energy Code (2009), Non -Residential Energy Code (NREC) effective January 1, 2011. A separate permit is required for any new or altered freestanding or building mounted signs, electrical work, and fire suppression systems. Applicants may apply for separate permits at any time prior to commencement of construction. Revised or resubmitted plans shall be provided in the same format, size, and amount as the originally submitted plans. Revised/resubmitted drawings shall indicate by means of clouding or written response, what changes have been made from the original drawings. Plans for all involved departments will be forwarded from Community and Economic Development. 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 14 Inspections When required, special inspections shall be performed by WABO approved agencies or by agencies approved by the building official prior to permit issuance. Construction must be approved by all reviewing departments prior to final building division inspection. All concerned departments (Planning, Public Works, Electrical, Fire) must sign off before the Building Department can final the structure for occupancy. Building final must be approved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. No building or portion of a building shall be occupied or used for storage prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. No work shall start prior to the issuance of the permit. The information provided is based on limited plans and information. The comments provided are not intended to be a complete plan review and further comments are possible at time of building permit plan review. LAKEIIAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT (Brian Asbury, 253-946-5407, basbury@lakehaven.org) Water • A Certificate of Water Availability (application form enclosed) may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one (1) year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed, allow 30 days to issue for typical, 5 days for accelerated, processing. • A Developer Extension Agreement will be required to construct new mainline water distribution facilities &/or fire hydrant for the proposed development (presumed 8" DI main, bored under/across S 348th St). Additional detail and/or design requirements can be obtained from Lakehaven by completing & submitting a separate application to Lakehaven for either a Developer Pre -Design Meeting or a Developer Extension Agreement (application forms enclosed). Lakehaven continues to encourage owners/developers/applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes separately to Lakehaven, early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. ■ A separate water service connection application (form enclosed) submitted to Lakehaven is required for each separate building, and for each new service connection to the water distribution system, or any modification to an existing water service connection (e.g., larger service, irrigation, abandonment of existing service(s), etc.), in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current `Fees and Charges Resolution'. Non -single-family properties require separate domestic, irrigation (if irrigated landscaped areas are incorporated into the site development), and fire protection (if required or installed) water service connections. • There are two (2), existing 5/8"x3/4" meters currently serving the property. These meters should be evaluated under UPC to determine if they're adequate for the proposed uses. • Installation of separate private, backflow prevention assemblies will be required as follows. Contact Lakehaven's Cross Connection Specialist, Chris Zoepfl (CZoepfl@Lakehaven.org) for additional information on these requirements: • Coffee Shop — Double Check Valve Assembly (DCVA) is required; located directly adjacent to the commercial/domestic meter for this building. 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 15 Car Wash — Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA) is required; located directly adjacent to the commercial/domestic meter for this building. Alternatively, Lakehaven will allow a DCVA at the meter with a RPBA located at the building. s Irrigation (if separate service connection) — DCVA required; located directly adjacent to the irrigation meter. Applicant will be required to complete and submit a Water Use Questionnaire (WUQ, copy enclosed). Information in the WUQ will be used by Lakehaven to confirm specific premise isolation (aka backflow prevention) requirements. The associated Developer Extension Agreement must achieve a point of either Substantial Completion or Acceptance, as determined by Lakehaven, prior to activating any new commercial/domestic or irrigation water service connection(s). Sewer • A Certificate of Sewer Availability (application form enclosed) may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one (1) year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed, allow 30 days to issue for typical, 5 days for accelerated, processing. • A separate sewer service connection permit (application form enclosed) is required for each new connection to the sanitary sewer system or any modification (re -align, abandon, etc.) to an existing sewer service connection, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current `Fees and Charges Resolution'. Minimum slope for gravity sewer service connections is 2%. In addition to all other sewer service installation standards, installation of a Type 1, 48" monitoring manhole is typically required on the private building sewer line, for all new or modified non-residential connections. • There is an existing sewer service connection for this particular parcel (see enclosed SSCP 24625). Applicant will be required to install a Lakehaven-owned, Type 1, 48" sewer manhole onto the end of the existing mainline stub on the south side of S 348th St, extending (or reconnecting the) 6" sewer service line SE to/into the property. This work will be managed under the required sewer service connection permit. ■ Applicant will be required to complete and submit a Sewer Use Survey (SUS, copy enclosed). Information in the SUS will be used by Lakehaven to determine specific pretreatment requirements. General • For any proposed change or increase in usage beyond the level of the water and/or sewer system capacity previously purchased for the property(ies), Lakehaven researches prior system capacity charges paid, if any, and evaluates the subject property(ies) for the existence of any available credits and determination of a capacity `base level' for the subject property(ies). For any new or modified, non-residential connections sought after December 31, 2007, Lakehaven will assess additional Capital Facilities Charges (CFC) to property owners, where increased usage of the water and/or sewer systems beyond the property's established credit level(s), including increases attributable to usage associated with existing service(s), is indicated based on owner's submittal of estimated water consumption figures. Additionally, Lakehaven may levy a capacity rental charge for capacity utilized, based on water consumption records, above the level of capacity available following payment of any additional CFC and/or new or modified service connections as noted herein. The owner has the option to make full purchase of any system capacity deficit at any time. • System capacity credits are available for this property from system capacity charges previously assessed, paid directly to Lakehaven, and/or credited to the parcel(s) for 2.28 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU) for water and sewer, each. Please contact Lakehaven for further detail. 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 16 Lakehaven's Capital Facilities Charges are calculated on the basis of Equivalent Residential Units (ERU). Residential equivalency for non-residential connections will be estimated based on anticipated water use (1.00 ERU = 255 gallons per day for water and 220 gallons per day for sewer). Owner will be required to provide a reliable estimate of proposed water consumption (domestic and irrigation separately) for the property (information from a similar facility may be submitted in lieu of a new estimate). Lakehaven's current 2011 Capital Facilities Charges, subject to change without notice, are $3,097/ERU for water and $2,784/ERU for sewer. All comments herein are valid for one (1) year and are based on the proposal(s) submitted and Lakehaven's current regulations and policies. Any change to either the development proposal(s) or Lakehaven's regulations and policies may affect the above comments accordingly. SOUTH KING FIRE AND RESCUE (Chris Ingham, 253-946-7244, chris.ingham@southkingfire.org) This project will require one new fire hydrant. Fire hydrants shall be in service PRIOR to and during the time of construction. The proposal for automatic fire sprinklers in lieu of a hydrant cannot be approved. CLOSING This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication meeting and is intended to assist you in preparing plans and materials for formal application. We hope you found the comments useful to your project. We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the City's review of the formal application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter does not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per FWRC 19.40.070 (4). As you know, this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication materials submitted. Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify information regarding development requirements outlined above. In addition to this preapplication letter, please examine the complete FWRC and other relevant codes carefully. Requirements that are found in the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project. If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative noted above. Any general questions can be directed towards the key project contact, Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Becky Cha in Assistant Planner I 1-101527 Doc ID 57619 Mr. Schweikl May 20, 2011 Page 17 enc: Master Land Use Application Process II, III, & IV Submittal Requirements Zone Use Charts SEPA Checklist Variance Process Mailing Labels handout Wetland Reports Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement/Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas CPTED Checklist Lakehaven Water/Sewer Availability Developer Pre -Design Meeting Developer Extension Agreement Water Use Questionnaire Service Connection Application Sewer Use Survey Sewer Service Connection Permit SSCP 24625 c: Steve Davis, 6124 Panorama Drive NE, Tacoma, WA 98422 Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Engineer Fernando Fernandez, Building Department Greg Vause, Code Eriforcement Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire and Rescue 11-101527 Doc ID 57619 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (CDRQ Preapplication Conference Sign In Sheet Nj:a'% Coffee &- Steve's Car Wash w 11-101SM7-00TC, May 12, 2011 NAME WITH PHONE 9-,53 6 q-1 1�7 - �17.c l G I.� zS 3 ' - Z73 ;Z" yc 7Z 1 �i��h.P,� ��r�I� �L� N i►-�2 835' 26�3 No 61 .ruq�-I - S 1945 S. 375th Street • hweikl & A Federal Wa3) 2 9450 C ssociates, pllC Phone: (253) 26-08 Civil Engineering, Project Management and Consulting bschweikl@comcast.net April 15, 2011 Project Narrative Project: AJA's Coffee & Steve's Car Wash The following project narrative is provided to the City of Federal Way as part of the Pre - Application Conference submittal process for the proposed AJA's Coffee & Steve's Car Wash project. The project is located at 803 340 Avenue South, just west of the King County Metro South Federal Way Park and Ride. The overall proposed project consists of one existing parcel, (Parcel No. 02021049087) which total approximately 0.574 acres (25,000 sf before dedication) in size. The property is owned by Mr. Steve Davis who is parking vehicles in the rear of the property and is currently renting out the existing single-family structures (2) located on the site. The City of Federal Way zoning classification for the site is CE — Commercial Enterprise according to the GIS Zoning Map. Proposed uses are permitted out right in the CE zone. Currently the site has two (2) single-family wood framed residential structures located on the project site. All of these existing structures will be removed as part of the proposal. In their place, the project proposes to construct a 300 square foot drive thru coffee shop, a 2000 sf automated commercial car wash facility and a two-story 625 sf footprint car wash pay station and upstairs office structure. PROPOSED SITE: The project layout was designed to allow for bi-directional customer vehicle staging at the coffee shop to allow for increased amount of customer vehicles (6) awaiting service with decreased possibility of congestion at the project entrance at S. 348th Street, nor internally restricting vehicle movements to the car wash, office and vehicle vacuum stations. The access to the project is proposed to be a 30 foot concrete driveway access located mid property. The two existing concrete driveway accesses will be removed as part of this proposal. The access to the automated car wash will be at the southwest corner of the property and customers will then travel a separated drive aisle to the car wash pay station prior to entering the automated car wash facility. The surrounding properties and uses are as follow; East and South: The King County Metro Transit South Federal Way Park and Ride facility. The occupied main parking facility is located to the east and is situated approximately 6 to 13 feet above our project site with a block retainingatl,�f4l/ED high chain link fen facing our project site. The wall is very effectivel: rre - APR 21 2011 `4AY CDS dense row of mature cedar trees approximately 30 feet tall. The P&R property to the south of the project is undeveloped native lands adjacent to the West Hylebos Wetland Park. West: The West Hylebos Wetland Park lies to the west and is undeveloped native vegetation. North: The S. 348th Street ROW is to the North of the project and on the other side of the street lies to the West Campus Business & Office Park. The site naturally slopes from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. There is an approximate drop of 16 feet across the site, with an average slope of 6.2%. There are a few small areas where the average native slope exceeds 28% for a very short distance. The majority of these areas are not naturally occurring, but are the result of man made fills in the rear of the existing homes. We are aware of a previous a previous submittal that there is a small amount of wetland buffer area (unknown amount of square footage) that may exist in the southwesterly corner of the property. We propose relocating this unknown buffer area in the southwest corner to a 4,868 buffer area further to the north to be created as buffer that would lie below the proposed retaining wall and be adjacent to the West Hylebos Wetland Park. This created buffer area would also be the location of the discharge level spreader for the project flow control facility. With the existing height of the block retaining wall, chain link fence and tall mature cedar screening trees immediately to the east of the project acting as a effective barrier to view corridors, physical access and use interaction we are proposing to place both the automated car wash facility and the office at the property boundary to allow for project circulation and functionality. It is highly unlikely that any future use of the King County Metro Transit P&R facility will include removal of the existing level earthwork pad established by the placement of the retaining wall along the along our joint property boundary. With our proposed development is effectively screened by the mature cedar trees and with the substantial elevation difference between the two projects there is no practical need for a building setback or additional landscaping material since there is no occupant use of the P&R's property beneath the wall or visual site lines that might be degraded by our proposed development. In fact this area from our property line to the face of the wall is an unsecure unregulated access point to the rear of the P&R and West Hylebos Wetland Park due in part to the lack of visual observation opportunities to the public along the S. 348th Street ROW. STORM DRAINAGE: The proposed grading plan calls for constructing a level structure building pad to raise the site to near street level for the purposes of access, storm drainage flow control and public visibility from the S. 3481h Street ROW. The site is within the Hyelbos Creek Basin and is subject to Conservation Flow Control and Basic water quality treatment according to the City of Federal Way Storm Drainage Manual Maps. 09156-Project Description.doc The site is proposing to install a private underground cast -in -place cement concrete detention vault with precast hollow core slab top for the purposes of providing Conservation Flow Control for the proposed commercial site. The proposed location of the vault is in the southwest corner of the property. Since the site and the location of the vault is located adjacent to parcels that will remain in native vegetative cover as park conservation open space and not ever occupied we are proposing to place the vault in such a manner as to utilize the one-half of the perimeter of the vault wall as a portion of the proposed retaining wall constructed to raise the finished grade of the project. As previously stated we are aware of some wetland buffer area that maybe present in the southwest corner of the site we have designed the project layout that we have provided for a 4,868 sf of constructed wetland buffer in an area that we set purposely set aside to address the need to provide some wetland buffer are to offset that in the southwest corner of the project that is crucial to our project vehicular flow pattern. We are assuming that the required detention will be approximately 14,500 cubic per acre of commercial development. The preliminary detention vault water surface depth is proposed to be between 6 and 7 feet in depth. In conjunction with the detention vault we are proposing to install a 4'x6' Filterra water quality unit to provide the necessary water quality for the site. This unit has the capacity to handle approximately 0.50 acres of PGIS. Since we are proposing to utilize an above ground Filterra water quality unit that intakes surface drainage we are also proposing to follow an approved City of SeaTac modification to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) detention vault design detail to incorporates the relatively new use of the surface Filterra unit that was not approved and available for water quality when the 2009 KCSWDM was adopted. The City of SeaTac has the approved the removal of the water quality dead storage and sediment storage from the 2009 KCSWDM detention/water quality detail with the incorporation of the Filterra water quality unit that will not allow trash and sediment into the private under normal operation and storm events. This design modification is currently being utilized for a new AutoZone retail auto parts store with in the City of SeaTac. The proposed regulated discharge from the detention vault will be to a level spreader placed at the foot of the retaining wall within the proposed wetland buffer provided. The level spreader will serve as a dual purpose facility providing moisture to the created buffer area for plant establishment and act as a disbursed outfall for the detention vault. The roof stormwater generated will be discharged into a separate PVC/CPEP private conveyance system to decrease the input to the Filterra unit increasing its water quality treatment capabilities and treatment flows by bypassing the clean roof stormwater to the detention vault. 3 09156-Project Description.doc SANITARY SEWER: The sanitary sewer service will be provided via the existing sanitary sewer stub that connects to the site and the two existing structures on the site. The automated car wash facility will have a drain to the sanitary sewer system to discharge soap/dirt laden process water when required. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE: Each of the proposed structures on the site will be served by a single metered service connecting to the existing main in S. 3481h Street. It has not been determine if the existing services will be retained to serve the site. The water service requirement for the automated car wash facility has not currently been determined. FIRE PROTECTION: The proposal for fire protection is to rely on existing fire protection infrastructure that was installed to provide service the project site at the time of the installation of the S. 3481h Street right-of-way (ROW). Fire sprinkler systems are not are not proposed for any of the structures on the site. The layout's pavement maneuvering surface provided in the southern half on the project should provide sufficient room for Y backing of a standard fire truck or emergency vehicle. If you should have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me, Brant A. Schweikl P.E., at (253) 226-4508, and I will provide you with the information that you require. 4 09156-Project Description.doc AJA' S COFFEE SHOP AND STEVE' S CARWASH Project Number 09156 This photo was taken near the westerly access to the site and depicts the rear of the project. The photo shows the large mature cedar trees that line the eastern property line of the parcel. s CITY OF Federal Way DATE: May 10, 2011 TO: File FROM: Becky Chapin MEMORANDUM Community Development Services Department SUB]ECT: AJA'S COFFEE & STEVE CAR WASH - (11-101527-00-PC) 803 S 348T H ST CITY OF Federal 'Way DATE: May 9, 2011 TO: File FROM: Fernando Fernandez SUBJECT: 803 South 348th Street (PIN 202104-9087) MEMORANDUM Community and Economic Development Department 2007 Aerial Photo from King County IMAP (Before Land Surface Modifications) 4- L5a.1 ci �v n urg s7 Page 1 of 2 File #11-101527-00-PC • r 4� amp;.. 1*da. W122'19'27 84" - -�-- - - IN, 2vsr E rooa svcn aourcl OMOGOO lmagarr Date 6-+1 2010 1"a l:'17'�; {� p 122, 4525 al-W a[vr 2n" EYe all �43"0 CITY OF Federal Way April 27, 2011 Brant Schweikl Schweikl & Associates, PLLC 1945 South 375h Street Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Re: File #11-101527-00-PC; NOTICE OF PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE Aja's Coffee & Steve's Carwash, 803 South 348th Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Schweikl: The Department of Community and Economic Development is in receipt of your preapplication conference request. The application has been routed to members of the Development Review Committee and a meeting with the project applicant has been scheduled as follows: 9:00 a.m. — Thursday, May 12, 2011 Hylebos Conference Room Federal Way City Hall, 2°d Floor 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 We look forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend the meeting as this will be the only notice sent out by the department. If you have any questions regarding the meeting, please contact me at 253-835-2641, or rebecca.chapin@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Becky Chap. Assistant Planner Doc. I.D. 57515 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 26, 2011 TO: Ann Dower, Development Services — x2 Lee Bailey, Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Becky Chapin FOR DRCMTG. ON May 5, 2011- Internal May 12, 2011, 9:00 am - with applicant FILE NUMBER(s): 11-101527-00-PC RELATED FILE NOS.: Previous pre-app done on site — 07-102709-00-PC PROJECT NAME: AJA'S COFFEE & STEVE CAR WASH PROJECTADDRESS: 803 South 348 h Street ZONING DISTRICT: CE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Preapplication meetting to propose a 300 sq. ft. drive thru coffee shop, 2,000 squre foot carwash station, and a two-story 625 sq. ft. carwash pay station with upstairs office. Two existing single family homes to be removed as part of proposal. PROJECT CONTACT. Brant Schweikl, P. E. Schweikl & Associates, PLLC 1945 South 375th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Project Narrative w/ site photo Site Plan RE C E I V E r MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF, APR 21 2 L!' � 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 FederalWaYITY OF FEDERAL WAY 253-835-w.ci axderalw y.co www.c ityoFfed era] wa09 y.�am CDS APPLICATION NO(S) I— tot �;?7- —00 PC, Date � 1 L Project Name _ �`t-i C�'� � � t37F-yF ; G /fe on—,H Property Address/Location Parcel Number(s) ©¢ G 7 Project Description G�►2 1��-srf . �� �= G�c� - J,�J� if P�Fy� �T��"��l PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification tot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) _ Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Reggr Information CoMM16i4L E'I" pfzLS[� Vroning Designation VAA03� Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): 4ft Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant 4- _P ._ Lr Name: p4k*�7 g0_A V3 -lam j P f Address: i�5. z5 SAY City/State: F-pDffJE k L. J V.k Zip: =:7317-r— Phone: - {' 43 Fax: - �p Email: Sia atuw-.-,h 4,,7) O- Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: Address: 6I City/State: Phone:r3 Fax: Email: `�ls�x��t11Ttc�ibiL<<oM Signature: Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Ilandouts\Master Land Use Application y m 58 of 0 > m Mmm m0 Z N --. �n A �P Cn z � m N M o -� O \ / m � (n m V) m o Ln m m /z� Vl -� m — < M M0 r z �Q 00 �p 00 Nm z >p — D C-) ) D ) MU m :1) IT! < M M << O 0 0 c CC V1 Vr > V rn M M ?' :v m 0 M •• z IT! �M a� r o� M p� o Cn � �o m III v D �OJ Z �� n a M c71 n m m 7111 D M �jn:> No r a M M D mo D rn Noz C)tJ) rr o z �0, C 00 P C- n = c W N � C C � �a D C z — rn Z X z :!3 -nc- m r r C —Irr� II II II Cn Il Cn to n P rnoorn0 z < -<- v v 7n 3 rnwwam rn ✓azx �or� m-ncm -v m r n ;oN O O D p m y m m M is _ Cw1��X� ocnc0 Dnr'* zgMN S c� M w -aim zzOo o �' -` o-4 a3 R' � z r m N p�� mC,O "�oo C D v 3 m- p p Z = - n m MCRM-� �M0 W 11 1 Cor 0 .I M 00 o = (ACo 01 //01aM v, V/ so oz= cDnzJ0 � m a o n m�m z�Mo D _ Roy �� o C-) m V —mi o — C) C-) 'P m p mcnm w w O 0o zc Do cnc� O oz rn to .. C= Cc a z �m n�� o� N O ti z a ov =rn x M_ r_ � N N N N M O O 00 "d M o �agrn \ ==I m v M �� T5 �� 15.00, \ wl \ NJ '\ �\ LF;'12 OpEP \ 1 I 0 ,A\ \\ 7 �N 8v ° 9'36"tj 10 .001' \\ 's oo \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ MBC '-z I! as o c� o 0 �, o o =z g rn o om Z � r a rn �a -ap _;;0 F= FriFmm72Cf) p N N N N n co a Z W o -C WOW W W mmzm 00M0000 J r- u u (n I W" - --` CAI rn \d. 1 dl (T \ ;0 (n a d - N — W J 0D D u) ;0 m e u w 0 r b 0 1 1 1 tzj 5.12 N N � Cn C7 0 � II = N W J I O 0 CUAIB 1 1 vo m -- _- �� \ \ )E I \ 230 Nrn CP Z N Z AINK\-\ r� I I NCT .r amomrn I I I I i PIZ�� I 1 1 1 A � o wp MO N-M,c0CN')7000 m N fTt W0oN V Na CDD J_ Cn cm:,n C) m C)P D N 1 w >.N-� C D C� N p [n -� C)N c' r W w r- � D W r C,- z r L r �N C �NC>n W ���n m w > Fri Co Ln D N� rm DOmm m c7 v O �D O m O m m m m Z z z .. N T1 �V �z �O O 0 m 00 ■■ O D m ommqa 0J M m p nZ D M M 0 C_ Q w zo 000 Project: AJA'S COFFEE/STEVE'S CAR CD Z PL PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SITE PLAN CD ..i. Co C) Client: MR. STEVE DAVIS rn j C!w w w 6124 PANORAMA DRIVE NE, TACOMA, WA 98422 N 1 o_ D� z T 0,) m M 1 Z z ic Tm WASH SCHWEM & ♦ Assomm, mir CIVIL ENGINEERING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT rCIO & CONSULTING 1945 SOUTH 375TH STREET Bus: (253) 226-4508 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON bschweiki0comcost.net (253) 606-5586 98003 -123R 26TN c ufT PCBIs-+AV Cr to w ' �'AV Revision: ■o 0 0 MC :to C7 -n OM \ to ?010 M v \ t7 =0 O a mn -n �= M \ M %0 M ;p1q -,,� (A M< CA 00 t7 'C 0� IT M p \ c MC a zNC0 G� \ V \ \ G) M .a M i ■ ■ Int. I Date: