Loading...
95-100715JCITYOF 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH May 9, 1995 Mr. Steve Lowry Urban Design, Inc. 611 Market Street Kirkland, WA 98033 (206) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 RE: Patten Property Conceptual Site Plan; Application Number PRE95-0032 Dear Mr. Lowry: Enclosed you will find preapplication meeting information regarding your proposed 123,815 square foot retail shopping center. The 16.25 acre site is located on the northeast corner of 1st Avenue South and South 320th Street. The enclosed comments have been prepared by the Federal Way Building Division, Department of Public Works, wetland consultant, Lakehaven Utility District, and Federal Way Fire District. Questions regarding this information can be directed to the individual departments. In regards to planning related items, the site is currently not planned or zoned for the proposed use. In order to develop the site for the proposed use, the city's Comprehensive Plan map and zoning map must be amended to a land use and zone which allows the proposed use. Two significant actions affecting all properties within the city are currently underway. First, the city is preparing a new Comprehensive Plan for compliance with the Growth Management Act for adoption by September 1, 1995. Second, the city is revising all nonresidential zones for concurrent adoption on September 1, 1995. Not knowing details of either the draft Comprehensive Plan or new commercial zoning districts, I am unable to give you substantive direction on design parameters for the proposed development. Future development of the site will be entirely dependent on the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations assigned to the site. Over the course of the next several months, I encourage you to participate in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning processes to advocate your position on appropriate land use and zoning designations for the site. If you are not successful in getting the site designated for the proposed Mr. Steve Lowry May 9, 1995 Page 2 use, you will be required to follow formal procedures for requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning maps. Alternatively, you could modify the proposed development to be consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan and zoning. In the event you are successful in getting the site designated for the proposed use, I encourage you to request a follow-up preapplication meeting or meet with me individually regarding design and development of the site based on the new designations. If you have any questions regarding this information, please give me a call at 661-4108. Sincerely, Greg Fewins Senior Environmental Planner enc c: Development Review Committee a io:patwn.wp A N7+M E ��L�A--L- A7rE7\) Des s c. ,T-CA \loss" s s rw- �� f r o f-, w/t/ — Ple—E A-° P f-IT � !hr✓�ar'rf•t�3 n,lnc- lDc�T- Ckkw- UPU rY 61s?MC-T �-T � 4: - zr W,0 ,aA Y Z47-71749 �51L-ass �cr-v��? 28�3 - 52,E 2 G3?-zL6'7 9 `llp- —13 3 4 (6(- y( z3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA OF: May 4, 1995 ATTN: Mr. Greg Fewins Senior Environmental Planner FROM: Lakehaven Utility District SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 6 — Safeway Preapplication Meeting with Staff (PRE95-0032) COMMENTS: Water: A developer extension agreement will be required to extend water mains on —site. Sewer: A developer extension agreement will be required to extend sewer mains on —site. NOTE: Copies of the District's facilities maps are attached for your convenience. By: / _ Date: E M y Cossette Supervisor of Technical/Support Services TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMERCIAL Agenda Date: May 4, 1995 Subject: Safeway/PRE95-0032/Fewins To: Community Development Review Committee From: Greg Brozek, Fire Marshal's Office WATER SUPPLIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION Fire hydrants shall be in service PRIOR to the start of combustible construction. [UFC 10.5021 Existing fire hydrants on public streets are allowed to be considered as available for the project. Existing fire hydrants on adjacent properties shall not be considered available unless fire apparatus access roads extend between properties and easements are established to prevent obstructions of such roads. [UFC Appendix III-B] A Certificate of Water Availability shall be provided indicating the fire flow available at the site. [UFC 10.4021 When any portion of the facility or building protected is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. [UFC 10.4011 Hydrants shall be located not more than 300 feet on center. Such distances shall be measured on the path of vehicular access. * Hydrants shall not be located closer than 50 feet to any building. * Hydrants shall not be obstructed by any structure or vegetation, nor shall the visibility of the hydrant be impaired for a distance of 50 feet in the direction of vehicular approach to the fire hydrant. * Fire hydrant locations are subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal or his/her designee. [Administrative Policy 10.0041 When exposed to vehicular damage, fire hydrants shall be suitably protected. [UFC 10.105d] FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADWAY Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. [UFC 10.2021 During construction, an all-weather fire department access roadway is required when any portion of an exterior wall of any facility, building or portion of a building is more than 150 feet from a fire department access roadway. [UFC 10.2031 EXCEPTION: provisions for a sprinklered building. All fire department access roadways shall be constructed of an all-weather surface capable of supporting a 25 ton vehicle; the maximum roadway grade shall not exceed 12 percent. * All fire department access roadways shall have (1) a clear and unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet, (2) an overhead clearance of not less than 13 feet six inches, (3) all turns or bends shall be designed at not less than a 32 foot inside and 40 foot outside turning radius. * All fire department access roadways which have dead ends exceeding 150 feet shall be provided with a cul- de-sac at the dead end. All such cul-de-sacs shall be not less than 80 feet in diameter. [Administrative Policy 10.0061 Designated fire lanes may be required for emergency access. This may be done during the plans check or after the facility is in operation. [Federal Way City Code Chapter 15, Article IV, Division 31 When required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof. [UFC 10.2061 Gated access to the complex shall meet the following conditions: A: Gates when fully opened shall not reduce the required 20 foot width of the access road. B: Locking or securing of gates shall be in a manner approved by the Fire Prevention Division. [Administrative Policy 10.0031 AUTOMATIC FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS Plans and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval of kitchen grease hood and duct fire -suppression systems. [UFC 10.5031 Plans and specifications for fire alarm systems, automatic fire -extinguishing systems, standpipes and their appurtenances shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to installation. [UFC 10.5031 An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all occupancies requiring 2,000 gpm or more fire flow or where the total floor area included within the surrounding exterior walls on all floor levels, including basements, exceeds 10,000 square feet. [Federal Way City Code Chapter 8, Article II, Division 41 Area separation walls shall not be considered to separate a building to enable deletion of the required fire sprinkler system. The automatic fire sprinkler system shall be tied into the fire alarm system (last zone) in all buildings having an automatic fire detection system. Fire Department Connections shall be located at the front of the building(s) or structure(s) served; not located on the walls of the building(s) or structure(s); and shall be identified as to the type of system served. Fire Department Connections shall not be located more than 50 feet from a fire hydrant and shall be located on the same side of the road as the fire hydrant. Fire Department Connections shall be located not less than 18 inches nor more than 120 inches from the finished edge of an approved roadway or fire lane. The inlets shall be not less than 18 inches nor more than 36 inches above the finished grade. The inlets shall face the driving surface and be protected with caps. [Administrative Policy 10.0021 Sprinkler plans shall bear a Washington State Certificate of Competency stamp, AUTOMATIC FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM An automatic fire detection system is required in all buildings exceeding 3,000 square feet gross floor area. This system shall be monitored by an approved central station and/or remote station conforming to the current requirements of the National Fire Protection Association standards and/or the Fire Marshal or his/her designee. [Federal Way City Code Chapter 8, Article II, Division 41 Plans and specifications for fire alarm systems shall be submitted for review and approval prior to system installation. [UFC 14.103(a)] Alarm -initiating devices, alarm -signaling devices and other fire alarm system components shall be designed and installed in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Standards 14-1 and 14-2. [UFC 14.103(b).] The fire alarm control panel shall be installed at the following location: [UFC 14.103(f).] A remote fire alarm annunciator panel(s) shall be installed at the following location(s): [UFC 14.103(f).] Fire alarm control panel and remote annunciator panel keys shall be located in a Supra lock -box to be located [UFC 14.103(f).] The fire alarm system shall be supervised by an approved central, proprietary or remote station service. [UFC 14.1051 FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS TO BUILDINGS Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. [UFC 10.3011 When access to or within a structure or area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or firefighting purposes, the chief is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an accessible location. The key box shall be a type approved by the chief and shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required. [UFC 10.3021 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: THESE COMMENTS VALID FOR 180 DAYS FROM REVIEW AND ONLY FOR THE PLANS REVIEWED. PR DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Pa h_w � (a -�_- CA L5a�Wo' PROJECT IMAM FEDERAL WAY BUILDING SECTION 661-4118 OCCUPANCY 60'5e+ ba C k a ( f a M Lkvt_d :d /& r V'/J are-q TYPE CONSTRUCTION 1. Submit with completed application for permit, seven complete sets of plans of 24"x36" maximum dimension (include architectural, structural, electrical, drainage, utilities, and landscaping). Provide three each 83/s"xll" and three full size site plans for addressing multiple building sites. X2. At submittal provide two sets of structural calculations prepared by a professional engineer, registered in the State of Washington. �3. At submittal provide two copies of soil investigations and reports, as specified in Chapter 29 of the Uniform Building Code. }� 4. At submittal provide two sets of energy code calculations, including lighting budget. Washington State Energy Code (1991). Non -Residential Energy Code (NREC) effective April 1, 1994. 5. Provide two copies of King County Health Department approved drawings. 6. At the time of submittal, those regulations which are currently in effect shall be applicable to all project plans and s eciiicla, tipons. The City of Federal Way has currently adopted all Uniform Codes, 1991 editions. q VN � �L 1 �] J t4 tAie_ 36' C(S __'!�_7. Washington State Disability Standards apply (WAC 51-20). A 8. Special inspection by an approved testing laboratory is required for site welding, high -strength bolting, piling operations, sprayed -on fireproofing, structural masonry, and cast -in -place concrete. Include testing lab selection and personnel credentials with building permit submittal for Building Section approval prior to construction (must be WABO certified agency and inspectors on January 1, 1994). C ►r 9. Separate permits are required for demolition, signs, rack storage, rockeries, etc., refer to , t1 for electrical permits. Plumbing and mechanical should be included on the / main application for permits, described in #1 above. X10. Revisions to submitted drawings will be subject 8 /s xll . _V11. Minimum estimated fireflow (gpm) 55 3l to additional plan review fees; if on larger sheets than z ° - IVZ_qV t Cf Z 12. Provide TWO FULL SIZE SITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE FEDERAL WAY POSTMASTER, showing approved locations, when installing gang -type mail boxes. 13. No building or portion of a building shall be occupied or used for storage prior to the issuance of the CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. _�(14. No work shall start prior to the issuance of the permit. 15. Other: S"3_�S PREPARED BY DATE P"EDE V.F RM PACIFIC 3025-112th Avenue N. E. P.O. Box C-97304 Bellevue, WA 98009-9304 MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Fewans, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way FROM: Keith Fabing, Wetland Biologist, W&H Pacific DATE: May 2, 1995 RE: Patten Property Pre -Application Review 5G� JOB NO: 3-0420-0801 (1.61) This memo provides comments on the proposed Safeway development pre -application for Parcel No. 0821049258. These comments are based on review of a conceptual site plan prepared by Urban Design, Inc., dated 1-18-95. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of 1st Avenue S. and 320th Street. The area of the three parcels is 16.25 acres. The applicant is proposing to develop a 55,000 square foot store, 68,815 square foot of neighborhood retail services, and 424 parking stalls. A field investigation was not completed determining the presence of wetlands on the subject property. The National Wetland Inventory does not depict any wetlands within the subject property. Vegetation communities within the subject property boundaries are described in the pre -application submittal as consisting of mature trees and a significant scrub -shrub understory. Five wetlands were depicted within the subject property on the Conceptual Site Plan. The wetland areas are described below: Wetland A 36,053 square feet Wetland B 2,322 square fee Wetland C 5,543 square feet Wetland D 2,626 square feet Wetland E 3.570 square feet Total Area 50,114 square feet. The applicant is proposing to relocate part of the wetlands. The proposed mitigation plan intends to replace these relocated wetlands at a ratio of 2:1. The applicant is also proposing to plant a vegetative buffer between the proposed development and the adjacent residential neighborhood located to the north, and to develop pedestrian trails through the proposed wetland buffers. (206) 827-0220 Fax (206) 822-5341 Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Design • Environmental Services Patten Property Pre -Application Review Memo May 2, 1995 Page 2 Section 22-1356 of the Federal Way City Code requires the applicant to submit a wetland report prepared by a qualified professional approved by the City that includes the following information. 1) An evaluation of the area in question based on the definitions in "Division 7 - Regulated Wetlands" of the Federal Way City Code. 2) An overview of the methodology used to conduct the study. 3) A description of the wetland including a map identifying the edge of the wetland and plant communities and detailed description of the method used to identify the wetland edge. 4) The wetland classification (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, "Classification of Wetland and Deep Water Habitats in the U.S.") 5) A list of observed plant and wildlife species, using both scientific and common names, and a description of their relative abundance. 6) A list of potential plant or animal species based on signs or other observation. 7) An evaluation and assessment of the existing or potential functions and values of the wetland based on the following factors: surface water control. - wildlife habitat. - pollution and erosion control. - groundwater exchange. - open space and aesthetic contrast. - recreation, educational and cultural opportunities. The director of community development shall use this information to determine if the areas are regulated wetlands and, if so, the precise boundaries of those regulated wetlands. The setback area from a regulated wetland is all land within 100 feet in every direction upland from the edge of the regulated wetland (Code Section 22-1357). Any alteration within a regulated wetland must be authorized by the City Council through Process III (Code Section 22-1358(d)). All applicable sections of "Division 7" of the Federal Way City Code will apply to potential development adjacent to regulated wetlands. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should always be advised of any fill activity occurring within or adjacent to wetlands prior to approving a final design. Fill material andlor dredge spoils cannot be placed in wetlands at anytime without written approval from the U.S. Armyf Eagincers, Patten Property Pre -Application Review Memo May 2, 1995 Page 3 As part of any request under Code Section 22-1358, the applicant shall submit a report, prepared by a qualified professional approved by the City, that includes a mitigation plan that includes the elements described in Code Section 22-1358(e)(1). Mitigation of wetland impacts shall be restricted to on -site restoration, creation or enhancement of in -kind wetland type which results in no net loss of wetland area. Where feasible, mitigation measures shall be designed to improve the functions and values of the impacted wetlands. Minimum acreage replacement ratios can be determined upon review of the wetland delineation report. Replacement ratios may be increased or decreased based on criteria described in Code Section 22-1358(e)(3). All required wetland mitigation improvements, except monitoring, shall be completed and accepted by the Director of Community Development prior to beginning activities that will disturb regulated wetlands, and shall be timed to reduce impacts to existing plants and animals. Minor improvements including walkways may be located within the setback area from a regulated wetland if approved through Process I based on the criteria described in Code Section 22-1359(c). If you have any questions, please call me at 828-2883. 04200801 \wp\PATMN. me m CITY of - qd.—L-E3 PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Fewins FROM: Ron Garrow For Your Information DATE: April 26, 1995 SUBJECT: Safeway (S. 320th & 1st Ave. S.), PRE95-0032 The information received from the applicant has been reviewed and a field visit conducted to verify conditions on the site. The following comments are provided for future application on this proposal: 1. The applicant will need to submit with the application a written narrative on the relevance to the subject site of the 7 Core and 12 Special Requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and a Level 1 downstream analysis. 2. Storm water runoff from the site must be controlled through the use of facilities designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the KCSWDM. These facilities include, as a minimum, detention facilities, biofiltration swales, and oil/water separators. The site plan to be prepared for the project shall take into consideration the spacial requirements for these necessary facilities and shall depict their conceptual location. The current plan depicts the storm detention area (presuming this area is also intended for treatment facilities) in a location on the site that is higher in elevation than the parking lot of the development. The location will probably need to be adjusted to reflect the conditions on the site. If runoff from the site discharges to a Class 1 wetland within one mile of the site, a wet pond will be required in addition to the detention and biofiltration facilities. A wet vault will not be an acceptable alternative to the treatment facility requirement. Biofiltration swales are also to be provided per the KCSWDM. Access roads are to be provided for maintenance of these facilities. 3. The recommendations of the Executive Proposed Basin Plan, Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound (Plan) are to be incorporated in the design of detention facilities for the proposed project. More particularly, the site is located in a portion of the Plan area designated for the implementation of basinwide recommendation BW-2. This recommendation calls for the use of a 7-day storm event in sizing the detention facilities instead of the 24-hour event generally used in the KCSWDM. A 30% factor of safety need not be used in the design of the detention facility for this basinwide recommendation. 4. The applicant will Go required as part of the SEPA process to prepare and submit for approval a Traffic Impact Analysis. If the applicant decides to go forward with this project, the city's Traffic Engineer will prepare a scoping- sheet for the proposed project which shall be a basis for this analysis. The results of this analysis shall be a basis for requiring street improvements along and beyond the frontage of the site in excess of code standards and payment of pro-rata share contributions to other traffic improvement projects used to mitigate the impacts of development. Any questions regarding this analysis can be forwarded to the City's Traffic Analyst, Saeid Daniari, at 661-4133. 5. The applicant will be required to construct full width street improvements along the entire length of rights -of -way fronting the site. Improvements shall comply with the applicable sections of the Federal Way City Code for the classification of the roads fronting the site. Improvements shall include pavement widening and potential overlays, bicycle lanes where applicable, vertical curbs, gutters, landscape strips, sidewalks, street trees, street lighting, and associated storm drainage facilities in accordance with the KCSWDM, all of which are to be installed on both sides of the centerlines of the rights - of -way. In particular, the roads fronting the site are classified as follows: S. 320th Street Princ. Arterial (5lanes - 60 feet wide) First Ave. S. Minor Arterial (5lanes - 60 feet wide) Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated along both streets as necessary to accommodate the ultimate street improvements. 6. Per Section 22-1477 of the FWCC, the applicant may request in writing to Ronald Garrow, Senior Development Engineer, a modification, waiver, or deferment of the above street improvement requirements. The request must address and at least meet one of the 4 criteria listed in the section of code. Upon receipt of the request, it will be routed to appropriate staff for a determination and a response made to the request. A submittal of a request does not assure the granting of any modification, waiver or deferment. 7. In response to the site plan provided, the following comments are provided: a. The loading dock will not be permitted in the orientation shown. This orientation produces potential conflicts with customer traffic trying to enter and exit the site resulting in potential back-up of traffic in the street. The loading dock must be placed behind the building or sufficiently far away from the driveway to prevent back-up of traffic into the street. b. The most westerly driveway on S. 320th Street will not be permitted. This driveway is too close to the intersection for safe operation of vehicles. Only one driveway will be allowed on S. 320th St. In order to allow for left turn movements out of this driveway, it will need to be sufficiently far enough back from the intersection so as not to interfere with the queuing of left turning traffic from S. 320th St. onto 1st Ave. S. C. The most northerly driveway which provides access for service vehicles only need not be a three lane wide driveway. 8. Plans for the proposed improvements shall be drawn on 24"x36" size sheets using a 1" =20' scale. 9. Topographic surveys prepared for the site must be done using KCAS datum. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memorandum April 24, 1995 TO: Ron Garrow, Senior Development Engineer Pat Kettenring, Federal Way Fire District K.C. Ellis, Lead Plans Examiner Mary Cossette, Lake Haven Utility District Keith Fabing, W&H Pacific FR: Greg Fe 0s, Senior Environmental Planner RE: Application No. PRE95-0032; Patten Property Attached is a pre -application proposal to construct a shopping center. The site is located on the northeast corner of 1st Avenue South and South 320th Street. Please review the request and provide written comments at our CDRC meeting scheduled for May 4, 19.95. A meeting with the applicant is scheduled for May 11, 1995. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 661-4108. i:cdrememo.wp MASTS LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33530 tat Way South ♦ Federal Way, WA 98003 APPLICATION NO. ��Q� - 0 Q;P, Date � Gon�aG"lAgent Z Name of Applicant 2- " L � iia n m-p- y e, _O wner Address I Nlr_,r ke:v i�3� 90vtPhone ZZ - S (O Signature Owner Name/Address _ So-�� n C [�do~ 12-4�'hAk - Q� Phone 3-7 �2 � g (if different than applicant) �I leV u� ) .A 9 �00G .. 3*00 1 Property Location ` I'A A-v-' , ant A A-`b -4 is r:, Kroll _ 7 1 11V Zone a 5P o Legal Description a-X �� ►��1 _?� Lb`� �� Project Description ��'U����'E�� Q ► Z� QCj��, S 'ecR� Parcel Number(s) 0 g Z i D y- q L� Type of Permit Required: SEPA Notice Sign Checklist Mailed Board Site Plan Review R R Land Surface Modification R R Boundary Line Adjustment Binding Site Plan R R R Short Subdivision Subdivision R R R Shoreline R R + Variance R R R Conditional Use R R R Use - Process I R R Use - Process II R R R Use - Process III R R R Quasi -Judicial Rezone R R R Variance R* R R Comp. Plan/Rezone R R Annexation R R Line Elimination e-Application Meeting R = Required * = Optional by City 3 72 `, r LUG 17 10 , l T is 48 13 J3 �� 7 • S. 31 4TH P 34 I ------ i r 1t 8 32 yil 19 Y-K c, 74 '` 31 ,[; 35 Li 4 48 CC 29 30 QI OL?e 2\\S �7------- 22 R T 87 15 � ® ? .t 5 29 REC. V! „•-jai 26 ? 27 0 2a 4 to -� ar 46 1 77 1 @5 26DI y 11 t� 22 seo ! I 31 l uu 21 25 I I 19 20 23 24 45 34 D-8 6 u a 9 17 260 1 l a `` I 111 12 113 14 15 16 t8 7 1 7 1 I i1 25 TRACT 100 - •-----'--_•--.- -- -------"`--------'-"� 19 .3 OPEN AREA i 24I 16TH- PL. I e' 2 { I � 34 35 5' ' 6 6 - 5 9 29 30 31 `2 33 4 20 ( 23 ILL IDE E I G TS a11 I' 3 5 VI I 38 37' 36 ial 111f21 22 42 41 � I 27 39 `._i /�4 1 42 71 -r" W 1 2 1 Ir IIS t Vj 60 2 66 3 I r 53 1 59 I tk '� r ji tt•� 52 ` I 66 j z58 61 I a' - 5s ! C4 7 sl rug 69 Ll I 47 57 82 64 0 44 45 46 49 3? u Ia 50 S5 56 93 70 a 9 I vi 10 Q � s lot 2 IL I 14' 40 O� �- m iUlu ■Y DATE 11E SI0N µ! 9-23-92 CORRECTIONS PER .N"'S CRAY• V-VE PROO1'" DMWN: O.V.V. cmacKED: R.S.L. „,P11O11ED: J.V.M. WATER F A C I L I DATE: 10-18-91 Ile A.C. It A.C. I IQ* — if A.C. 0 u : `-' \J ' f 1; KCsp ■ti+fiflbA Mmul 'WAY MUICAL i CENTER (GROUP HEAIZM Sa � WE" twm. e P C.V. CAUPU9 w/ coao. Box TERRACE 10. Or DOW. GiC w/,vcv[ x W,rC. BCx CAc TAC SAC $ 56 54 2Z P& r ----- --------- -- ------------� °� �; - - -- --- -----� i 0 -- r-R.C. -- �.R, "n'RMG a .� so• 59I 1 LOT 2ra r I ® 1� x c 5 LOT 3 22 I 8 � 5 I 9aD LOT 4 ! ai � 3 48 .o� +s aP r,c j 47 as i 1•` 0 N F4 1 1vif W ,Typ.. Q. a 49 (Ifmm I _ I M I 1 S. 325TH. PL, a O , 45 �` vi 10' PERWWENT ESVT. - GOLFUN PROPERTY Il I, ' LAKEHAVEN I sa 31 CENTER 30 t 22 AI NT I I I I KC 77020107+ sP 1076005 I i LDG � yy PA KING jjjj ! PI _ 1Z GSL E I 1 L07 2 i LOT , i i•-t P� uax�q[ ° EWTI - - - - -- r» 70' irmi JFU F ,r'a Ifot - wr 20' 14 no @ 1� 11 I �+ E L S �. _ „w20 a. 5 la 42 'b O t T o x C17V °' ) r 9 f' 19 rA f W r►c Ie 27 zs• 296' 44 � II Y 309' 24, ,4 213' WOODS 1 1Ra,— RE � 3 23 f 20 43 KEHA N 200' - UTI ITY DISTRI � �zas•t 4 Es+rr - a 1 ti 21 2s• 37 = �z `s J � � D 8 � LF 1_L_J LJ 1 I � -- -- 6 ---'--- Jr ------ IE l 34 e da trol 31 S W 319 H LAN r gQ� ,w 33 l ��I�aDS In s 1 a ;a � � � 11'� � Cj Ogy�� f W 35, ir + $ b g ry C�+An�gN�g' 1 nor z rg Lv. 5 , 4 3 I da as 35• D-9 'AGILITY MAP RI ICI ICYCII N/11/�uC�R 1 a b 4 W 17n7u s LAKEH AVEN UTILITY DISTRICT 292' 124' 207' 375' - 0 100 200 1 I I-H-8 i1 s 12 L a _ I7 •_ s3 16 5- �� 4T 33 P 34 T is 32 Vj v ,LJ � ° l 75 31 19 14 35 Q CC 1Z, D 7e x9 o 22 X Y rs 16 23 rpvc 17 E51rt r 2 27 � aLc. 28 17 yp C n - n2l + 625 `26 2 y } 22 1 3 z: 25 2i ! 2Q 23 24 cv lV 18 j 3 H — 8 26 10 11 w 47,9 72 13 14 i5 ,a 1718 25 '� 19 °7PRACfEN �A •� 24 I l6TH. PL. s U n I 28 29 3t 2 33 34 35 ,. 20 by �n c TS 0II ��ff 5 (n 27 39 38 37 J6 lsl 21 22 J i 41 40 •I 42 ? pq 4 - -- --- - W ♦ 43 � �� � Vi i xs 66 g7 60 i Pft2 3 �" 53 r 59 jI 68 d i s2 p� . at N li 5 Z 13 69 N 4A [a.51 Q '1 37 62 64 O 44 45 48 i7 49 Z 55 58 63 70 50 !n 4° 3CO) 33 uo 2 Q BASM 22 St l-8 ar own IAI"lam DRAWN: O.V.V. • a+ecueo: rz.ss, AM,1O,M J.yx SEWER F A C DATE 1c:3-9t Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview Of Patten Property So. 320th Street and 4th Avenue So. Federal Way, WA For Urban Design, Inc. 611 Market Street, Suite #8 Kirkland, WA 98033 by I ES Associates 1514 Muirhead Avenue Olympia, WA 98502 (360) 943-0127 FAX (360) 943-2791 April 4, 1995 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................... 1 2.0 Site Description ........................................ 2 3.0 Evaluation Procedures ................................... 3 4.0 Evaluation Results ...................................... 6 4.1 Vegetation ..... .................................. 6 4.2 Soils ........................................... 8 4.2.1 Soil Conservation Service (SCS) ...... . ...... . ... 8 4.2.2 Soil Cores ................................. 9 4.3 Hydrology .. , ......................... , .. 9 4.4 Wetlands ....................................... 10 4.4.1 Functional Values ........................... 13 4.4.2 Biological Values ........................... 14 4.4.3 Wetland Classification ........................ 15 4.5 Wetland Buffers .................................. 16 5.0 Project Impacts ................... . ..... . ............. 16 Bibliography ............................................. 18 Appendix A - Figures and Maps .............................. 20 Appendix B - Tables ....................................... 21 Appendix C - Routine On -Site Evaluation Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 22 i 1.0 Introduction A site evaluation was completed on a oblong parcel of property, that abuts So. 320th Street on the south, First Avenue South on the west, and 4th Avenue South on the east, within the city limits of Federal Way, Washington. The site evaluation was conducted to locate, define, delineate, and classify wetlands or other sensitive habitats located on the property. Work was completed under the guidelines of the City of Federal Way Code, Article XIV, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Division 7, Section 22.1356, The site has access from a dead-end portion of 4th Avenue So., and off of First Avenue So. There is an abandoned access road, that runs from east to west, off of 4th Avenue So, that allows general access to a major portion of the site (Figure 1 - Location Map, Appendix A). 1 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 2.0 Site Description The project site is rectangular, being longer from east to west, than from north to south. It slopes gradually up hill, from the both the south and west property lines, to a plateau that extends across the north -central two-thirds of the site, at approximate elevation 365 to 370. In the northeast corner, the property slopes up to elevation 385, which is the highest portion of the site (Figure 2 - Site Map, Appendix A) . Over all, the area is second -growth forested habitat with the propensity of non- native invader species taking over most of the upland areas. Douglas fir, big -leaf maple, red alder are still present in a majority of these habitats. Depressions in the central portion of the site collect and hold surface water for long enough periods of time to support wetland vegetation and to create hydric soil conditions. Four of the five depressions are isolated, with no hydrologic interaction on -site or off site. A long linear depression in the southeast corner and along the south property boundary, abutting So. 320th Street, crosses the street in a culvert to adjacent properties to the south. This appears to be surface water collection from portions of So. 320th Street and from higher sloped properties to the north and east of the site. is Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 The access road starts off of 4th Avenue E. and runs east -to -west, through the near center of the property. The area has been logged in the past, leaving a second growth stand of Douglas fir and deciduous trees throughout. Sour cherry, red alder, big -leaf maple, madrona, and cedars are mixed through the site. The flat area in the northeast corner has a fairly extensive stand of cherry. Shrub cover is mixed, with Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom being prevalent through the drier areas, with salmonberry and hardhack being prevalent in the wetter areas. 3.0 Evaluation Procedures The site was evaluated using the guidelines set in Division 7, Section 22.1356 of City of Federal Way Code; Federal Way City Ordinance, Chapter 80, Environmentally Sensand the Fede[al Manual for tbe Identification and Delineation of JurisdictionalWetands (1989), which is the procedure recognized by the City of Federal Way. Site work was divided into two phases: (1) collection of background data, including previous wetland maps; U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service N.W.I. maps; Soil Conservation Service, Soil 5urvey of King Qount�.� Washington; U. S. Geological Survey topographic maps; and conceptual site plan, 3 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 provided by Urban Design, Inc.; and (2) an on -site inspection which was also divided into two segments. Segment 1 consisted of a preliminary site evaluation to identify the general vegetative character, concur with the topographic information, and to locate the wetlands that were identified on City of Federal Way maps. Wildlife use or sign was also noted and recorded. Field maps showing the locations of wetlands, roads, or other areas of interested was completed to be used in the final wetlands delineation. The second segment of Phase 2 consisted of defining the outer boundaries of the wetlands and flagging them with sequentially numbered flags. Because of multiple wetlands on the site, the wetlands were designated as A through E. Wetlands were lettered instead of numbered, to reduce confusion during the discussion of classes of wetlands. Soils cores and vegetative plots were taken in areas, where there is a transition between upland and wetland vegetation. Soils were compared to the SCS soils map, to determine if they were consistent, or if there were indicators of additional fill or soil modifications on the project site over those identified by SCS. 4 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 Each soil plot and vegetative community was examined to determine if it met the three criteria required for an area to be classified as a regulated wetland, i.e., wetland vegetation, hydric soils, and positive hydrology (Tables 1-3, Appendix B). Areas, which met all three criteria, were classified as wetlands. Once the criteria was established, separating wetlands from uplands, the boundaries were flagged. At the time of the field work, wetland values were analyzed using Wetland Evaluation TechniguP,(VEE-G, Vol. II: "Methodology" Adamus, (1987); Wetland Values, Concepts and Methods for Wetlands Evaluation, Reppert (1979); and the requirement of the Federal Way City Code. Based upon size, vegetative class, and functional values, the wetlands were classified per the City of Federal Way Ordinance, and the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service, C,la,5$ificalbn of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of Way. Cowardin, 1979, which is the procedure used by the City of Federal Impacts of the conceptual project, as designed by Urban Design, Inc., were evaluated in relation to the different wetlands on the site. 5 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 In addition to the wetlands survey, a general biological overview was completed, with an emphasis on areas identified as Priority Habitats and Priority Species, as defined by the Washington Department of Wildlife Management 4.0 Evaluation Results Based upon the completed field work and analysis of the background data, it was determined there are five separate isolated wetlands on the property. Four of these wetlands had previously been located and designated on a map with appropriate buffers, as required by the City of Federal Way. The fifth wetland was located on a map and added to the data base for future reference by the City of Federal Way. 4.1 Vegetation Dominant vegetation on the non -wetlands portion of the site is a first and second growth Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) stand, with large patches of bitter Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 cherry (Prunus emarginata), scattered red alder (Alnus rubra), big -leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), madrona (Arbutus menziesh), with an understory of upland (UPL) and facultative upland (FACU) shrubs, including ocean -spray (Holodiscus discolor), osoberry (Osmaronia cerasiformis), Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), red huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium), evergreen huckleberry (Vaccinium ovatum), and black -cap raspberry (Rubus leucodermis). The low cover has salal (Gaultheria shallon), sword - fern (Polystichum munitum), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) and snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus). Wetlands Vegetation in the wetlands has a dominant tree canopy of black cottonwood (Popu/us trichocarpa), western crabapple (Pyrus fusca), and red alder. The dominant shrub vegetation is Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), Scouler willow (Salix scouleriana) and Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra) at the fringes, with salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), hardhack (Spiraea douglasi�, and red -osier dogwood (Corpus sto/onifera) in the wetter areas. Trailing blackberry (Rubus ursinus) extend into the fringes of the wetland areas, with cut -leaf blackberry (Rubus laciniatus) mixed in the understory of the uplands. 7 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 Wetland grasses are dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). The dominant upland grasses are orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and basin wild -rye (Elymus cinereus). Portions of the wetlands have creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), soft rush (Juncus effusus), with the wetland areas, that have been interrupted by the road, having a dominance of toad rush (Juncus bufonius) and velvet grass (Holcus mollis). (Figure 3 - Vegetative Communities map, Appendix A). 4.2 Soils 4.2.1 Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam 0 - 6% slopes (Figure 4 - Soils Map, Appendix A). Alderwood series. This nearly level to undulating soil is moderately well drained. It formed in glacial till and is one of the most extensive soils on the broad uplands in western Washington. In a typical profile, a thin mat of un-decomposed needles and wood fragments overlies a 1.5 inch very dark grayish brown gravelly sandy loam surface layer. The subsoil and the upper part of the substratum, to a depth of 38 inches, are dark yellowish brown, brown, and dark grayish brown gravelly sandy loam. The lower part of the substratum, to a depth of more than 60 inches is weakly cemented compact glacial till. Reaction is medium acid. These soils are not hydric and are classified as Entic Durochrepts. 8 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 4.2.2 Soil Cores Fifteen soil cores were taken on the project site, with the majority taken in the southeast corner, around Wetland A, and in the central portion of the site, surrounding Wetlands B thru E. Soils on the site were typical Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, with the influence of water and organic sediment collection in the depressions modifying the "A" horizon (Figure 5 - Soil Core Locations Map, Appendix A). Soil core information is included on Routine Evaluation Field Forms in Appendix C. 4.3 Hydrology The dominant hydrology on the site is rain and surface water runoff from gradual slopes to the north and east. Water collects in a series of depressions on the site (Wetlands B - Q. In the southeast corner, the water collects and continues to flow along So. 320th Street to the west, until it exits the site (to the south) through culverts under the street. Once the high water drops, it becomes trapped, creating a seasonally isolated wet depression (Wetland A). All of the wetlands are hydrologically isolated from any streams, lakes, or bays, which would be classified as V Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 associated wetlands under the Section 404, Clean Water Act, or City of Federal Way Ordinances (Figure 6 - Drainage Map, Appendix A). 4.4 Wetlands Based upon soils, vegetation and hydrology, there are five separated isolated wetlands on the property (Wetland Map, Back Sleeve). The largest of the wetlands (Wetland A) is located in the southeast corner of the site. Four other smaller wetlands (less than 6,000 sq. ft.) are located in the central portion (Wetlands B, C, D) and on the higher flat in the northeast portion of the site (Wetland E), between elevations 360 and 385. Wetland B is located south of the undeveloped access road through the property, with the remaining three located north of the road. Wetland A is 36,000+ sq. ft. linear, scrub/shrub area, with a slough sedge/soft rush ground cover. Dominant tree vegetation is alder, with salmonberry, hardhack tall shrubs and a mix of slough sedge, soft rush in the lower depressions. Willow becomes prevalent in the narrow drainage that extends west, with Pacific ninebark and red -osier dogwood mixed with the salmonberry and hardhack. Put Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 The soils are black in the "A" horizon, reflecting the hydric conditions and the collection of organic material sediments over the years. Wetland A has seasonal hydrology, with the deepest pockets and longest duration of saturation being in the eastern -most portion of the wetland. Water enters the site from the north and east, where it flows west in a narrow, linear drainage paralleling So. 320th Street, to the culvert that goes south under the street to the property off -site. Off -site, south of So. 320th Street, there is a continuation of the wetland on Group Health property. Wetland B Wetland B is the smallest of the wetlands (2322 sq. ft). It is located at the eastern end of a linear depression that extends to the west, beyond the wetland. Surface water collects in this portion of the depression for long enough periods of time to create hydric soil conditions and support a mix of salmonberry, hardhack, western red cedar, Oregon ash, and Pacific willow (along the fringes). To the south, the draw slopes more rapidly, creating positive surface flow. The soils are non-hydric in this area, even though there are scattered patches of hardhack mixed in with blackberry and other upland species, with the dominant canopy tree being Douglas fir. 11 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 Wetland C is a "J" shaped wetland, with its southern edge extending to the undeveloped dirt road through the property. The deepest portion of the wetland is in the south-central part, where there is winter open -water, with slough sedge, water parsley and soft rush in the shallower areas. Dominant shrubs around this wetland are Sitka and Scouler willow, with salmonberry and hardhack. Tree canopy surrounding the area is Douglas fir, big -leaf maple and red alder. Wetland D is a linear depression, with a deep -water pocket near its southern end. The wetland is surrounded with a mix of Sitka willow and salmonberry, with hardhack extending into the north end. The center portion has seasonal open water, with red -rooted flat sedge (Cyperus eryfhrorhizos) in the deepest portion, giving way to slough sedge in the north end. There is scattered soft rush surrounding the edge. The slope on this wetland is distinct, creating a very narrow transitional area between the wetland and uplands. 12 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 Wetland E is the northeastern -most wetland on the property. It is a shrub wetland, having a dominance of salmonberry and hardhack under a canopy of Sitka willow and red alder, with scattered Oregon ash and Pacific willow. The wetland is at the southern end of a linear depression, that extends north and east, approximately 120 feet. The drainage in the eastern portion of the depression is sufficient to prevent hydric soils or wetland vegetation. 4.4.1 Functional Values Functional values for all of the wetlands are grouped together, since the wetlands perform in the same manner. The major value is the collection of surface water. All of the wetlands, with the exception of Wetland A, are retention basins, where the runoff water is trapped. Any sediments or contaminants on the site are trapped in the bottom mud or taken up in plant material. Wetlands B through E are strictly groundwater re -charge areas. Wetland A acts as a surface water drainage corridor, during the wettest portions of the year. The water collects and moves westerly, through the dense shrub vegetation, until it reaches the culvert. The emergent marsh species and grass in this 13 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 narrow corridor act as biofiltration chamber, cleaning sediments or nutrients from the water. Possible contaminants, in the form of road residue, become trapped in the mud bottom and taken up in the plants; whereas nutrients, including nitrates and phosphates from water runoff from residences, are trapped in the vegetation or utilized and converted by the bacteria living in the aerobic zone, between the surface and the mud bottom. Water that is trapped in the wetlands when the drainage and runoff stops, percolates into the groundwater table or is taken up through evaporation or evapo-transpiration. Because of the size of the wetlands, they make little contribution to flood de - synchronization; although, the water in Wetland A is slowed by vegetation, reducing the rate of flow through the culvert to the south. 4.4.2 Biological Values The wetlands and their riparian buffers are used by a variety of western Washington birds typically found in urban areas or areas close to development. There is no evidence of threatened of endangered species, as listed by the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service or the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, nor are there Priority Wildlife Species or Habitats, as listed by Washington Dept. of Fish & Wildlife. 14 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 There is evidence of possible seasonal waterfowl use in Wetland D, with the open -water component; however, the remainder the wetlands do not provide sufficient open -water habitat for waterfowl or marsh birds. Tree frogs were heard on this site. With the types of habitat available, tree frogs and some salamanders are probably raised in portions of these wetlands, particularly Wetland D, which has the deeper open -water component. The upland areas were examined for white -wash or linear woodpecker drillings, which would indicate use by raptors or pileated woodpeckers. There was no evidence of use by either. This is not unexpected, however, because of the dense development surrounding the site. 4.4.3 Wetland Classification Wetlands were classified using the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service Classification Service, as identified in City of Federal Way Ordinance, Chapter 80, Sec. 80.145, the site were classified as Palustrine Broad -leafed Deciduous Scrub/Shrub Intermittently Flooded (PSS1J) wetlands. 15 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 4.5 Wetland Buffers Under Chapter 80, Section 80.150, Leaulated_Wetlands- _Setback Areas: "The setback area from a regulated wetland is all land within 100 feet in every direction upland from the edge of the regulated wetland." 5.0 Project Impacts Based upon a Conceptual Site Plan, drawn by Urban Design on 1/18/95, the proposed project would impact the western linear finger of Wetland A, Wetlands B and C, and a portion of Wetland D. The remainder of Wetland D would be enclosed within the 100 ft. wetland buffer. A proposed mitigation/compensation plan is being considered to move Wetland B, C and D and the linear finger of Wetland A, to the east, where they would be interfaced with an expansion of Wetland A and possibly Wetland E. Wetland D would remain intact, but would be considered a portion of the wetland buffer, and therefore be mitigated in full, in the northeast corner of the site. 16 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 The proposed mitigation area would be 100 feet from all property lines and 100 feet from the proposed development site. This area would be approximately 41,600 square ft, or an area 2.0 times larger than the areas to be impacted by development. (Sheet 2, Back Sleeve). This equals the 2:1 ratio required by the City of Federal Way Ordinance, Sec. 80.155.40), "... for scrub -shrub wetlands with at least 30 percent of its surface covered by woody vegetation less than 20 feet in height..." A Conceptual Mitigation Plan will be developed as a separate document, once there is an approval of the mitigation/restoration concept, as provided. This constitutes a Wetland Assessment and General Biological Overview report on the Patten property located on So. 320th Street, Federal Way, Washington. 7"Rex" an Wormer Senior Biologist I ES Associates Patten.rp 17 Bibliography Adamus, Paul R., Ellis J. Clairain, Jr., Daniel Smith, Richard E. Young. 1987. Wetland Vol. II: "Methodology". U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment State, Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golat and E.T. LeRow. 1979. Classification_ Qf Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal -Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service, Washington D.C. Co-operative technical publication. Franklin, J.F. and C.T. Dyrness. 1969. Vegetation of arQuon and Washington. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon. Good, Ralph E., Dennish F. Whigham, Robert L. Simpson. Freshwater Wetlands -- Ecological Processes and Manaaement. 1978. Academic Press, New York. Greeson, P.E., J.R. Clark and J.E. Clark, eds. 1978. Wetland Functions and Values: Tbp, 9tate of Our Understanding. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Wetlands, American Water Resources Association. Technical Publication Series TPS 79-2. Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Marble, Anne D. 1992. A Quide, ja Wetland-Funcl'onal Design. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1986. Wgfiand Plants of the 51WP, of Washington. 1986 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication. WELUT-86/W12.47. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. Nallmal List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands m Northwest . U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication. WELUT-88 (26.9). Reppert, R. T., W. Sigleo, E. Stackhiv, L. Messman, and C. Meyers. 1979. Wetland Values. Concepts and Methods for Wetlands Evaluation, IWR Res. Rep. 79-R-1, U. S. Army Corps Enginrs., Fort Belvoir, VA 18 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 Robbins, C.S., B. Brunn and H.S. Zim. 1966. Birds of North Amprica. Golden Press, New York. Soil Survey Staff. 1988. . Cornell University. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wellands uehnQatian Menial. Tech. Rep. Y-87-1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic S-ysteM of Soil Glas,90fication-For Making anJ Interpreting -Soil Surveys. 1981. Agriculture Handbook No. 435. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey of County AreaaWaaWng=. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Washington Natural Heritage Program. 1987. Endancered. Threatened and Sensitive Vascular Plants of Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia. Washington Natural Heritage Program. 1989. Natural Heritage Plan. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia. 19 Appendix A - Figures and Maps 20 Y mzm fl s mm oL i i sy x v _ wr+s. asksrrrn '99t IES ASSOCIATES 1514 Mulch+ad Ave. Olympia. WashlnpAon (206) 943-0127 siaiaoz PATTEN PROPERTY SOUTH 320TH AVE FEDERAL WAY, WA SITE PLAN FIGURE' 1 � !I r�Jts�F NF►��rf� � F a 0 -• CV) i _ W 1 } r r rr r 1 r �. ... • r F r r` r r a +�k r 6 r •r l r ■+ r i k r r k k ii r� r �� R r r• r. � r ► r Y Q 1 r r. r r r R� r r r r r r. t......••..r ..r..r r I+ Y r•�♦ + r1 r r � a , r r a' r •F •.'. ::.. i.. t.. �•..Y , k r L ■! r r F .. e.. a ..... y..!... r W 1 t r • r r i r r ■ a* b r r r �F r ....... C .. r .. Ir.. f. p 1 f r .tr i r # r r �r f► a r •r•:::::}• + t+ r� P j• •r r r r r r a� r •■ r r 1 r r}:. J...t. y�� ► r r 7 r r -r•• �w r r' r -x�•k �� ' r n • r �: r t:. e:l. �+-a r r r . �r r � .•Ir•' �`T.+r � r !a r r r r r r a tr r ' r }1c �r wk r r r �l��r r� r ■ p r +.:��r r r p y r ��� � k r[• r �r r ��� � ■ r r `�//p + r r a r r r + k R � y�. r r r *` � r r r r✓ Ir R r r r l r ,y r r � i �t t r � r r r Yr ! r a r �• O I..� F ► r r p i r r r +} C r`.'r. t v r F.r ► k Y► r r tr r >'. r r r F' �■ s � r r � y 1 k F l R ■ r r r H�� F r Lli r r r ���lil r � 1 r r r r r �• r + r r r r Q SQq r r R r j r it r Y r c v' F v r •• k r r r F r r r, r r• r R r r R■ r r a r r r F W i � R R r• r r r R � r Y 1 r R r ryi 6 r r~ r. . .� .r r r } r. r'] + r K r ► r T r~r ��r � t/� r r r j rlr r E r r rl ► r rrr r'r r r r r� Q 11 ! � �� k` r R r F k' ► r r � r r r F rrr l r r r r r r r r� t F r r r r r r k r r a _ ■■■� _ .1 r s s 1 r. • � r ■ r-- � r ! r r r r r r ► � :: Y: t~� .7rr, r r.. .� r ! r r r� r1 T a r'1 r rl r y ""•�~•r :: E:: t::J ..t. r r i r r1 F r r •..Y. Y..•. .:�.�.. Q i r r CL Irrrlrrs:r:r. .1. k a r r r .jr r r r r� r r r r •:'!� :4':•r:: ';.. �':. (/1�7 � R R f r rf r a r r1 r r r :C.. i. :Ic .:r:. r: .r. •. � V :r• t•: is •:. t ! r r k r r" r Y r wJ r r_ ./+: ►• r• ..::! ::►r }..::::; C[ r r r rT r F r r Y r 1•.J.. c:. ry.. .. ..r.: r:. ti r yCO r� r .Y•.�r:.3..f..r..✓...e: • ! r r r i • yr ► ✓t r •r r 1;•ri.•>r..r..t...#..r..�.. =�arlr i r ► r r• ► r *- :. S :► .:w . r.. t.. r:.:r . >� + r r �r k r Y r r v . ■.::::cif.•:.............r aTs LU r R� r p } r •i..i .. r:. r...b .A•.s••r 1 W ! r r► jrR*ir F ■ r Y r Y•/ r r y i FY•�y,.:•.r...F ..p• •..:• irrr r jr ► + .:A..'i ..�• ��.��::111-►.. �, r :r r �r r !r r � F r •r .:r.�E:.i:.t...s7.:i..k.. k'% Co LL � r. 1• k r ' r �r r „r r r! r r r .y..r..r..r...r..r..■..k 1 n r r r fr _�[ F r rrr s Fr r r r r•..r::.R:::?::t::i:.r:::�. } r' ! r r� r r �R r F •F...".�.�• *.•":•.p...i..1 r R R r a r r r r +. .J..•. L.A .. Y•. t.. y.. • • # r ► F rf r r rlr P. ■ ► ■ ■ ■ R r • tr r ....... • ... L .. .. r. .. r , r r ��.. J•. X...r....r. CO) E• W 3 i I N C. iRUB a N J W O LAS FIR IFIGURE 3 N c; Ag IES ASSOCIATES 1514 Mulrh■ad Ave. Olympia, Washln94on (206) 943-0127 99802 PATTEN PROPERTY SOUTH 320TH AVE FEDERAL WAY, WA SCS SOIL MAP FIGURE 4 1-dLSm£ NFroHrs iLIA t di i •. - - r fr i5. op == '' �� ! ` I :: F r; �R : r� � w••f ' F ; - _ .-+yam tii _ v N 0 A T H > W loc W = CL 0 cr Q a N z= W � a0 �Cl) Ln cc LL Q cc W I� W LL _a W 0 a 3U = N cc Co W Q FIGURE 5 N 0 R T H a Z Q W d. 0 a z W to W a a G U a yca = g a 3 a � � W T- O FIGURE 6 Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 Appendix B - Tables 21 Table 1 - Definitions of Indicator Status Indicator Symbol ❑efinition OBL Obligate. Species that occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) in wetlands under natural conditions. FACW Facultative wetland. Species that usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67 to 99%), but occasionally are found in non - wetlands. FAC Facultative. Species that are equally likely to occur in wetlands or non -wetlands (estimated probability 34-66%). FACU Facultative upland. Species that usually occur in non -wetlands (estimated probability 67-99%), but occasionally are found in wetlands. UPL Upland. Species that occur almost always in non -wetlands under normal conditions (estimated probability 99%. NI No indicator. Species for which insufficient information was available to determine an indicator status. Sources: Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, 1989. Reed, 1988. Table 2 - Hydric Soil Indicators Hydric indicator Diagnostic Criteria Organic content * > 50% by volume Sulfitic material * "Rotten egg" odor Soil color * Mottling * Dark soil matrix color * Gleyed colors. Water saturation * Groundwater table at less than 1.5 feet from the surface for a significant period (usually a week or more) during the growing season. Sources: Hydric Soils of the United States. U. S. Department of Agriculture, 1991. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Handbook No. 436. Table 3 - Hydrologic Regimes and Wetland Characteristics Degree of Duration* of Inundation Inundation Wetland or Saturation or Saturation Characteristics Permanently inundated** 100% Semipermanently to > 75% - <100% nearly permanently inundated or saturated*** Regularly inundated > 25% - <75% or saturated Seasonally inundated > 12.5% - <25% or saturated Irregularly inundated > 5% - < 12.5% or saturated Intermittently or <5% never inundated or saturated * percent of growing season ** inundation > 6.6 feet mean water depth *** inundation < 6.6 feet mean water depth present present usually present often present often absent absent Sources: Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987. Clark and Benforado, 1981. Wetlands Assessment and General Biological Overview RE: Patten Property April 4, 1995 Appendix C - Routine On -Site Evaluation Forms 22 FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON -SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investirdator ) : Van Wormer—9tc�SS4pll Date: //,,7 Project/Site: pat 7e,) frd � Scate'!A)A County: ;,�9 Applicant/owner: W Q Transout lot 11 / Oacailed Site Description (Optional): Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N (If no, explain) 11as �0 vegetation, soils, and or hydrology en signifzc t y disturbed? Y_ � (it yes, explain) Plant Species 1. Q' /+u u 5 j- e" k w " 3. ���i�S d►'S Colp+� 4. VECETATION Status Stratum Plant Species (A c ❑ 6. lU.- Status Stratum I"ercer%,X, of dominant species that are OHL, FACW and/or FAC. (oG 3S�o Cam, Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion mec? N Hationalu: Series/Phase:lcler'Wap I S .,C( Subgroup• �.cr 1:i; t0e sail on the hydric 'list? Y undurermined? Y 15 rhe­sall Histosul? Y llistic e i edon n � p' present? Y CID "A" Horizon Depth: Z pli• Texture: 1�.the soil mottled?, (� N Cleyed? Y Matrix Color: /d Y r- 11 j Mottle Colors: 7. SS )(X `/A Ocher hydric soil indicators: "U" Horizon Depth: - -a 4f'i pl-lb Texture: Zo al"t-V GlL y Is the soil mottled? Y N elayed? C ( Y Matrix Color: /G t �/j Motcle Colors: Other hydric soil in icators: Is the hydric soil criterion met) N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? (V N Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: /D inches. Liar other field evidence of surface inundation or boil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? d N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? N Rationale: cy FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON —SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator ) : Van Wormer —X4 SS& �J • Date • Project/Site: e,) Fre 1 Scate!C;A County: ; � 9 Applicant/Owner: � ���I 'Pransuut f! lot p/ Dacailed Site Dascri�ptian ((Optional): .Z. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant conuuunity? Y N (If no, explain) HasveOetation, soils, and/or hydrology en signific t y disturbed? Y N (if yes, explain) v�cEf'ATION Plant Species Status Stratum Plant Species Status Stratum . �,,. r i t� ►.�, t4 :l . t� K g GL ' 3 a�n ►� fi4 C a 2s- `l ' 9. Perce[Xg of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, ands. or I:AC. O $ Is tho hydrophytie vegetation criterion met? Y N Iationale: Series/Phase:,4l4/e),,404,0rQ v�ll�r S� .*Ae< Subgrou P: is the sail on the hydric 'list? Y undc:rermined? Y it;the soil a Histosul? Y Ilistic epipedon pr sen-? Y Q "A" Horizon Depth: /a �' PH: 'Texture: �4 v l�y %�oa.� 1:: the sail mottled? Y Clc yed? Y Matrix Color: �6 a L1Z Mac-cle Colors: UN Ocher hydric soil nd cators: I'll" Horizon Depth: PH: Texture: ra v�lly Is the soil mottled? Y © Cl`yed? Y Q Matrix Color: l6 Y Mcttle Colors: i3i Other hydric soil incatars: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y. N Rationale: I4YD ROLOCY Is the ground surface inundated? Y Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated?' Y N Depth to free standing water in pit/ ail probe hole: �2 4 finches. Liar other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y 0 Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y Itationalu: 06 FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON -SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator(s) : Van Warmer 51011 • Date: Project/Site: ,� c-) Pro Scate-�VA Comity: ;� nt�plicant/Owner: W '!'railsvut V 1�1ot .)7 I)Qcailed Site Description foptiona.t) : 3 Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N (1 IF no, expi" Ali) Has is vegetation, soils, Y N (it yes, explain) Plant Species � and or hydrology en signif VE Status Stratu �a ob ATION Plant Species 6. t/�y disturbed? Status Stratum S'7'.0 C o #, a r -- tlercep,X. of dominant species that are OBL, FACW and/or f AC. t1a'= 1 Is tho hydrophytic vQUetatioii criterion Diet? N Rationale: Series/ Phase :14l�erWda� j'�"4 ✓ellt So *je,( Subgroup:e7�� V Is the soil on the hydric `list? Is the soil a Histosol? Y Y g Undetermined? Y Ilistic "A" Horizon Depth: to epi Acton present? Y pH: Texture: It; the soil mottled? Y V elayed? Y Matrix Color: l b y /L .�,// Moc�tle Colors: Other hydric soil if dicatbr's: "1]" Horizon Depth: Is the soil mottled? pl(. j N Texture:�'`q u Cl, < yed? y 6N Matrix Color: %6 Other hydric Macule Colors: �/ 3/// '� soil indi�cat��s: Is the hydric soil criterion met? (D N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface Inundated? Y Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated?, Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 1Z inches. Liar other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? D N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND Rjvr1ONALF. Is the plant community a wetland? dy N Rationale:' FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON -SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator i s Van Wordier-•�cc'SSso/� Date; //'7dlfs— Pro 'ect/Site: a r'') f r d cate'`(JA County: 9 Applicant/owner: t iaa Transout Plot UI I)ucailed Site Description e ptional): Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N (If no, explain) IIks a vegetation, soils, and or hydrology en significantly disturbed? Y N (it yes, explain) _ Plant Species 14k> `'� �w�jwj5 p�r'S Cal/o/r . Pic w r CAI: CL ft.-- ad G VECETATION Status Stratum Plant Species � s 7. f14C4 rZ�z U. 14cr.4 s Z lV Status Stratum Ilercept of dominant species that are OHL, FACW, an ❑r PAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion mec? Y ON Hationalu : �� Series/Phase: l eW r44d �'Q tee![ Y S I LS a Subgrou:&�;L IS the soil on the hydric ist? undetermined? Y It; the soil a Histosol? "A" If Y 11istic eliipedon present? Y Horizon Depth: Ir PH: Texture:Zaa'O" r 1:: the soil moctlud? Yj Cloyed? Y f� Matrix Color: 16j/ j/3 Ocher hydric Mottle Colors: soil ihdieators: "11" liorizost Depth: l o 1i pH: .Y Texture: Is the soil mottled? � Cleyed?• Y Matrix Color: �6 lZ Other hydric Mutcle Colors: soil ingica ors: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface fnundated? Y Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y Depth to free standing water in pit/sail probe hole: inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y C Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALZ Is the plant community a wetland? Y Rationale: 0 FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON -SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigato�r ) : Van Wormer —x&_ 51-9 /� Date: /�d /�S Pro'eet Site: �R t/ e-0 Pro :;cate!A)A County: Applicant/owner: 10 I- ' "f Pacailed Site DQs�ip�t i' ptional)�:$�`t lot u� r J Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N (if no, explain) Hasa vegetation, soils, and or hydrology en si=15ksturbed? Y N (ll yes, explain) GHQ VECE'1'A'P ION Plant Specie Status Strata itPlant Species Status Stratum 1.'{w�psc5 $pc.1 log I's , - < .? - 6. . u. 4 �L> 1�.• s r old +� f A a G[ 06 f A Gait .2$• Z �•. lU. percept, of dominant species that are OHL, FACW, and or FAC. �7a 3S�o e.rv,e_L Is the hydrophytic vo0ecation criterion miec? Y Rationalu : Series/Phase; � ey-woo fr4�ell� S�ILS p X< Is rile soil on the hydric 'list? Y It;the soil a Histosol? Y Subgroup:e5ZL� Undetermined? Y "A" Horizon Depth: j' Histic apipedon present? Y pH: 1::; the soil mottled? Y Texture:10a"UY rjv t uc / Cloyed? Y CN Matrix Color: /6 y/ �l Mot-cle Colors: �`J Ocher hydric soil indicators: "Ll" Horizon Depth:./d 11 pH: Texture: I-':; the soil mottled? Y Matrix Color: /oy �!� N� Clayed? Mutcic Colors: Y T.�1 U Other hydric soil in8icat ors: is the hydric soil criterion met? Y. ® Rationale: HYDROLOCY Is the ground surface inundated? Y Surface wator depth: Is the soil saturated? Y Depth to free standing water in pit/soil List other field evidence of surface probe hole: inches. inundation or soil satururion: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y Rationale: 0 FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-21TE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigatore-.%), ) : Van Wormer ~Oi 4-SSe ll pate • 1'ro j ect/Site : �a Pr C Cate?14)A Coulity:Applicant/Owner. �•Ducailed Size Dezcrition¢�ptional )ns�.�t lot fi Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N (1f no, explain) Ilase vegetation, soils, and❑r hydrology en signific t y disturbed? Y N (it yes, explain) GAL VECE'I'7►'PION Plant Species Status Stratuu Plant Species Status Stratum 5f ����`�`s fRc- • 4,0 E G. llercerkt of dominant species that are OHL, FACW, ancUor FAC. Is the hydrophytic vw.aetatioii criterion ;iiiec? Y Rationale: ev S ILA Series/Phase:�l�erWaaW p�Q vPll� a�¢x( Subgroup:� Is the soil on the hydric l ist? Y Undetermined? Y s the soil a Histosol? Y 11istic Opiptadon present? Y "J►" tlorizoii Dc►pth: r� X PH— Texture: �aa�Y Sc#. ••� 1� thy: Soil mottled? I Matrix Color: 16 V 9 jIZ- . Mottle Colors: v Ocher hydric soil Indicators: / "ll" Horizon Depth: O It ptl• Texture: �cc�Y S`z s Ithe soil mottled'; .Y Cieyed?� Y Q Matrix Color: G Mutcle Colors: Other hydric soil indibers Is the I%Ydric soil criterion met? Y Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or roil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y '� Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMIN1A'rION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N Rationale: 0 FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON -SITE DETLRMINATION METHOD Field Investigatore.-'%; ) : Van Wortuer --�c� S5� �� Date: ) Project/SiteFrd r Scata!IVA County: ;'1 Applicanc/Owner: � W¢ Transout U lot Q� I)acailed site Dascri tian ptiunnl]: Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant couuuunity? Y N (If no, explain) IlIS e vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology en signific t y disturbed? Y N (it yes, explain) VECF..l% ION Plant Species Status Stratum Plant Species Status Stratum l .9 u,1 u. s 5-1E � i�' k /" . r,4 C 6. :I. YZc�b� v�; cola lcp c �. 4.i.54/N,�/4cC&5 racf-.KOSc. (CA CLL PerceEXt. of dominant species that are 08L, i'ACW, and tnr FAC. S $ Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion mec? Y NN Itationala : // S ZLS � Series/Phase :,4l'er W oo� Q ✓t`lr �o*j1( Subgroup • }�J is the soil on the hydric 'list? Y ( i unducertuined? Y Is the soil a Histosul? Y 11istic apipedon present? Y �w "A" tlorizon Depth: 12 r, PH: It; tha soil mottled? Y 'Texture: Cleyed? 6 Y Matrix Color: �y Morcle Colors: Ocher hydric soil i2 atdrs: "ll" Horizo» Depth:- PH: Texture: Is the soil mottled? Y Cleyed? Y Matrix Color: l6 '2 $� maccle Colors: Other hydric soil ind cato Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y Rationale: HYDROLOCY Is the ground surface inundated? Y Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated?, Y N Depth to free standing water in pit/ it probe hole: inches. Liar other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y ® Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SPrE DL•TERMINXrION METHOD Field Investigator ) . Van Wormer-•��c,SS� �� Date: Project/Site: a �,. Pr d 10 Scate!ZZ)A County: �; ,v < Applicanc/Owner; a W� Transuut 0 Plot 11 0acailed Site Description Optional): Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N (If no, explain) Ilul 0 vegetation, soils, and/or hydrologyn signific t y disturbed? Y N (11'� yes, explain) e � I�Q n� ATION Plant Species Status Stratum Plant Species Status Stratum 6. C 10. PerceNt of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or f AC. �y 6 is tha hydrophytie vagetaxion criterion mec? N Ieationalu: // SILS C'� lf-�j �G) Series /Phase:�J (ej'w°p� r`z ut�f� o�K{ Subgroup: �P 1s the soil on the hydric ist? Y Unducermined? Y I5 the soil a Histosul? Y 11istic apipe-don present? Y "A" Horizon Depth: e( PH • 11'uxtuce • � e a use e It; the soil mottled., Y N el� yed? • Y Matrix Color: 16 Y! 3/2 Mnc-cla Colors: Ocher hydric soil indicators: "U" Horizon Depth: pH: Texture: �6Q.r�r 5 4 �✓4 Is the soil mottled? Y � L1`yed., Y Matrix Color: �6 �//3 Muccle Colors: O Lher hydric soi i i or i s clue hydric soil criterionu�et? � N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the around surface inundated? ( Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated?' N Depth to free standing water in ( t/soil probe hole: to inches. Liar other field evidence of surface inundation or soil suturution: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? 0 N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? /Y } N Rationale: � FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON -SITE DC'TERMINA'TION METHOD Field Investigator WQVan pWormear Date, e• /o1fSProject/Site:PW„;. Pro cate-IVA County: Applicant/owner: ,�9 I]acailed Sit4 l ; Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community'. Y N (If no, explain) IIau ►e vegetation, soils, and or hydro en signific t y Y � (it yes, explain) gy � Gdisturbed? at V E Whvr I ON iv Plant Species Status Stratum Plant £pecies Status Stratum 1. r" u ti S 2 NL Q r^ g a .i/ R a F'A ctk- 6. w a uc f�¢Cu. ?. FA c Il. I a] - Percept of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is tho hydrophytic vegetation criterion mec? Y N Rationale: / S2..O�Series/Phase:4lerlvaoof�r4✓e�.,,c� Sub rou is the soil on the h dric ist? Y 4 pit- y Subg erruined . �Yo Is the soil a Depth: Y Y Ilistic apipedon present? Y Q "A" Horizon Depth: l0 pH: '1'exture: It; the sail mo t tlud? Y 1V 1 `(Cleyed? Y Matrix Color: 16 Y ��Z J Mo t cle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: "11" Horizon Depth: •Z.O it pH: Texture: /^G r��/Y 5,4- Is the Soil mottled? y Cleyed ., 6` y �] Matrix Color: �.6 Y 5 MatcColors: O tiler hydric soi i dica or Match: Colors: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y. N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y QQ Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y Depth to free standing water in pit/it probe hole: inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y � Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONAL: Is the plant community a wetland? Y Rationale: 6 FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON -SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigato.Ye­%). ] : Van Wormer —Ka'.Ts-p %/ . ❑ate: - 1/�Q/fSProject/Site: fro scate!A)A County: Applicant/Owner:Sc,e Transout # U�t►,q 00-cailed SitQ DescrtiojnQ ptional]: ld Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N (lf no, explain) 11au c vegetation, soils, and Y N (1f yes, explain) hydrology en signific t y disturbed? VtGE11"]LTION Plant Species Status Stratum Plant Species Status Stratum 1. j� Y i^ c- S r s a. C. W 6. 1 . f I y mod; &,LJK G3 wq ri (ax C. LL ;.• J• �h e�,r ; C� r�W+iQ�J I L' GL lu.- Percept. of dominant species that are on, FACW, ancUor FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegacation criterion mac? Y Itationalo : / S2,I LS Series/Phase: l erWaa� ra yell o Sub rou /� j 1s the soil on the hydric `list? Y undetermined? . 44�j �ya 1s the soil a Histosol? Y HiStic apipedon present? Y "A" Horizon Depth: l0 " pH: Texture: lu ilia soil mottled? Y �V c:leyed? y Matrix Color: t/ 6 y L// Moccle Colors: Ocher hydric soil indicators: "A" Horizon Depth: p1l• Texture: Is the soil mottled': �Y N cloyed? Y �} Matrix Color: /ovit Moccle Colors: Y ��,{ LJ Ocher hydric soil Indic rs: Is the hydric soil criterion met? CyJ N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y (;;) - Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated?, /Q') N Depth to free standing water in b-ri /soil probe hole: inches. Liam other field evidence of uurface inundation or soi r I saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? 0 N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? OY NRationale: �J FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator j : Van Wormer —9 .55-0 1f Date: I'i-oject/Site: a .� Pro acate!eO4 County: ; ,v ` ! Applicant/owner: Wa arransuut ft rilot 11 Ilecailed Site 13escri�ption �Optional) : Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N (If no, explain) Wks c vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology� en signifi.c t y disturbed? Y (11 Yes, explain) ► l �i- VLCETATION Plant Species / Status Stratum Plant Species 1 , „ - /-It a r/0, a s�� Ila.J , FA« 6. '� • ,�7 r r �d i u roc v FA C GL •1. ��. -+• �G[.�td.5 [�i 5 C GCe r Status Stratum 1'erceLXX of dominant species that are OHL, FACW, an ,or PAC. z} 1 -Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Itationald: Series/Phase:�lclerWaa vell�r S py'4 guhc�roun:e;5.c.c_ 1s the soil on the hydric list? Y undutcrmined? Y l :i the soil a Histosul? Y 11is tic avipLclon present? Y 10 ttorizon Depth: 1 Z t/ pH: •I'tsxture: 1:: the soil mottled? Y Matrix Color: 4 yy r �� N� Cleyed? -Lie Y , �ndilcators: Mac Colors: Ocher hydric soil "U" Horizon Depth: - Z Sr rr pH: Is the soil mottled? Y Texture: Cloyed? Y N Matrix Color: f�6 �/ /Q 1/� Other hydric Mottle Colors: soi ihdic o s: 1s the hydric soil criterion met? Y ® Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y • Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated?- Y N Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: inches. Liar other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y ( __ 7N) Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMIbN NJVrION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON -SITE DETEKRMINATION METHOD Field Investig ntpr Project/Site:� ) : Van Wori::er —��.55@ II Date: `I e,) 'rd !;cate!A)A County: 9 Applicant/owner: W� `1'ransout #1 lot jj/ DQcailed Site lac�scri�ption �Optionhl): 12- Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? (Y--N (1f no, explain) 11au fie vegetation, soils, and or hydrology en siif' t Y N (ityes, explain) ,�,,� I�C{ gn�.y disturbed? lt �• _ I VECETATION Plant Species Status S ratum 1. r un a $ e4C4 .-4 ..0Q ylQ �X c: u. 6. 4. f d �yS�• /u 11 µt cLv.t� klI�CLA- i il.. /.wets r9A-GjYQ FAc 10. Plant Species / Status Stratum rA c- a-c 1► �- u 5 F,+ rt Percerkt. of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, an or FAC. .ts tho hydrophytic v`getatioli criterion mec? Y [N Hationalo : Series /Phase:4l ej� prQ vell� S IL-S �a�.9< eAJ40 IS `list? Subgroup:�t. �lJ rile soil on the hydric fs the soil a Histosul? Y Y undetermined? 11iStic Y "A" " apipedon present? Y Horizon Depth: 6 PH: Texture. 1 t; t11e soil mo t tlud? Matrix Color: 16ll Y N� Cleyed? Y N yy 3//Z Ocher hydric - Mottle Colors: saili`ndieators: "11" Horizon Depth : . PH: Texture: Is the soil mottled? Y � Clayed? Y N Matrix Color: {a. V S OtIler hydric Motcle Colors: sod l d ca s. � IS the hydric soil criterion met? Y � N 1 Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the around surface inundated? Y Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y q Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 1$. inches. Lisr other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y (` Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y /�[� Rationale: C� FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE: ON —SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field lnvestigator ) : Van Wormer --XU' 5S'4q%f Date to: Pl-oject/5ite: R ee! Fro 5catetA)A County: nl)nlicant/Owner: , e W Q `1'ransuut 1t 1 Oti cai led Siva 1]ascri Lion f]aptional) : /3 Do normal environmantal conditions exist at the plant community? Y N (If no, explain) liz►; 0 vegetation, soils, and or hydrology en signific t y disturbed? Y N (it yes, explain) R vr• ci;s ArION Plant Species Status St atum Plant Species Status Stratum 1. /frets Cyco, a ��4c 5 6. :l.7r'r�� �a 'ja C. kl. 9 10." Percept of dominant species that are OHL, FACW and/or FAC. 7 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion mec? N Itationala: n / / Series/ Phase :/c�erWdadI "vell� S I L S o�-At{ • Subgroe �ja up. 1s the soil on the hydric ist? Y underariuined? Y It;the soil a Histosul? Y "A" Ilistic epipcdon present? Y Horizon Depth: /Q'r pH:. •1•uxture: 1 s till: Soil Mottled? Y IV Cloyed? y Matrix Color: l6 3l3 Mottle Colors: Ocher hydric soil indicators: "U" Horizon Depth: a10f PH Texture: is the -soil mottled? Y Matrix Color: e y�L N Clayed? Y N l Y Mottle Colors: 5 y Y/� Ocher hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? N Rationale: a C [, � a ,(� Cr a r, • Z o •cl HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y a Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? t/N Depth to free standing water in p soil probe hole: / a inches. List other field evidence of uurfaca inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: Is the plant community a wetland? N Rationale: 0 FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON —SITE DETERMINA•rION METHOD Field InvestigPAor ) : Van Warmer ��cc SSA �� Date : I�rojeet/Site: 17 G� �p scate��je� County:41,"u Applicant/owner: -{'Wrrcans.:Lt I).: cailed Site Dc�scrip" tiara ( ptional) ; Do normal environmental conditions eicist at the plant community? Y N (If no, explain) Ilan ►0 vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology en signific t y disturbed? YN (t1 yes, explain)6,1; VECE.I'ATION Plant Species Status Stratum Plant Species Status Stratum Uj �1.�Y1ruT �(A s cQ rf�C PerceEXt of dominant species that are OSL, FACand/or FAC. 16�b Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Iationale: / S�IL Series/ Phase:/qlS eyWao� �y4 vell� o*.se< Subgrou 1s the soil on the hydric ist? Y undetermined? Y Is the soil a Histosul? Y Ilistic apipedon present? Y dD "A" Horizon Depth: pli: Texture: 1 t; thc: soil mottled? Y Cleyed? Y N Matrix Color: /0 X 2-11 Mot-cle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: "11" liorizon Depth:- pl1• Texture: Is the soil mottled': �Y N Cl. yed? Y N Matrix Color: 1 o y tAs Mottle Colors:Other hydric soil indi at Is cite 1►ydric soil criterion met? Y. N Rationale: HYDROLOCY Is the ground surface inundated? Y (0 - Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated?' ® N Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: la inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? &) N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N Rationale: 0L� FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON -SITE DETERMINA,'TION METHOD Field Investigator(s) : Van Wormer—9(c'S'S& Date. Project/Site: R .,� f rd 10 State:,i)A County: , ; ,5� 9 A1�plicant/Owner: a tvQ �1•rans�:c;t # 1�1�t �!1 I)acailed site ut3scription �ptional) : Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant couuuunity? Y N (1f no, explain) llas ie vegetation, soils, and or hydrology en signific t y disturbed? Y N (it yes, explain) VECE��n+TToN IV Plant Species Status Stratum Plant Species Status Stratum 1. J1& 6. 3. 44 5 6 0( �. - PercepX, of dominant species that are OBL, FACW and/or RAC. 6/� 13 tha hydrophytie W-getation criterion met? © N It:,tional.:: • s xLs j� Series/Phase:�lc�er�cA� r4 U-c r 6*4( Subgroup:�t. 1J Is the soil on the hydric'list? Y undetermined? Y 1s the soil a Histosul? Y 11istic epipedon present? Y "A" Horizon Depth: he li Of : 11'exture : g',�¢ y�Y � r4 W4 1t; Via soil mottled? Matrix Color: fd y 3�IL. N Mottle'Colors: Y Ocher hydric soil indicators: "p" liorizoil Depth: 1p "' pH: Texture: yet v� l�r S Is the soil mottled': Y N Clayed? Y Matrix Color: �6 Motcla Colors: Other hydric soil in is tors:(/3 Is the hydric soil criterion met. N Rationale: !-HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y_ (10 Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated?, (y} N Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 1/f/ inches. Liar other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? ® N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? 0 N Rationale: 1 � I 1 I P ! le 1 \ ~ � � r � � �r r r•� �� t �� �� � �-� �1 � 1 � � � mow• r� FIGURE 2 .09 96/90 �MO-j QAQjS 'Aq PQU6lSa(] fJMOJ aAalS :Aq umoj(] C) Z p U) z O C) C3 iC e of mm m r- O:z : U M m C7 s t:___ --- --l-I 2nd Ave--. S.— (7) 0 C) I+ 2nd Ct. S. CD 0 0 < M I (D 0 C) (D C) 100' Wetland Buffer + k (D (D CT ) r C:n3 D- Ord P 1. S. > 4 f +k + + + (D + + E E E + E E F C) CD + 4 + + + + E E t E E QC) < + f F 4 + + N F 4 + * + + + + + + + (. (D + (D :3 '< C/) C) I Ll cD * D 0 0 CL 4th Avenue South cn 0 moo 0 to aV) :r C) 0 rt O rn 70 a VA 0 0-) tmj O � f--h w N O N O o — 0 E 0 Daa.aaa Z o Mo0Co> TD 70 Ln �, .. CDC4NUiN0') Ln'a)"Cncm — JN-PNCD -P 0) Cj N C4 C/) cn U) w L L -n T, L I Q n_ : O �.<_ (D' d n 0 m O f + () :3 CD Q CD CD CD CD 0 3 %Q --a 0 Q r+ Ao _:3 -3 Cn l� CD 0 CD CD OD O O t1i O O: O�� 00 C C = 00-• Sao h N 0 0 N � . �? CP C, tD C) J • 00 =F O 005CD •CD CD r+ Q 0 `+ (J U) X C C� ^ C)O 0 0 o W N („I 00 N N v 00 J O ,09 = „L :e1OOS 96/90 :9100 tiMO-1 QAQjS :/(q paU6lsa0 /(.1MOj OA94S :/(q UAW(] M CO 1 � O O c� - 0 c N o O to 0 N o � O �I L4 C) Cn 4'9 O C e vrn rl -+ C 6 M rr� -- m Z 0 O 0 r .t' o (D 0 0 n � D C7 Cn O D Q x U) U) (D O Q) 0 (A0 Ln Ln. a 01 1 st Aven e South ~ i 345 350 E ! E E F E (D E E E r'+ E E E Q ! f E ci t E E E E E E E f E E E E E E E E E D E E E E E E E t r r t E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E f E E E E E ! • E E E E E E E E r E F F E E E E E r r f E E E E E E E F E E E E E E E F E E E E E E E t f E E E E E E E E E E E ! r E E t {�• E r E F E F E CD E E E E F f E E fi E E E E E E E Do F E E E E E E E f C- E E E E E E E E E F E E E E E t E t t ! ! r t ! r E E E E E E E f E E E E E E E E E E E \ t E r E E E F E E E 4th Avenue South V — T. 0 SO < O Q,-rd0 C 7 A 0 T (<D y 0 0 19 0 0 � 7 C ?0••� �G W rr d 0 0 0 0 rt fA G 73 C �0 cm0'a 000 p 0��� G� Q� n 0 �•� 7 000 NOpj 0 DO,,<< 7�A a .3K (D " ff tho cC0 3� "a 0 CD O Ct Cc -9 W 0 0* _O O 7 SL f O i 0 - 0 0 00 �G• O a 3 5' M m 0 =3 +. r+ 0 0� N � m�0a 0O0 �. '0O CD �pf co :Ec ao :3 < maw 0 l ° (on C= 3 7 a !Z 7 (0 COa° �03 rt7 0 °0 � rt 2. 0 o o�hs 30. $ m0 �g mC. *9O 3=0 , 0l O< AmCT (Dca 0 fla �<000 0 0.� 0 =� c- C C� C 0 p c0. a �O I- C a.� CD 7 D < �` �O a m _, m Zap l Cn� ? , ca �co ° a�0am c '' ° �a �$;3 �K 0 0 a� 00 0� � cc O O 0 0 , :U� W 0_-p 7 3 CA M -1 o WO 0. �° 0 c 0 �cV O i C '+ -0 0 0 a 0 0. U3 S OL O O dm 0 ° 7 0:3 0 0 O o- Ar -o 03? 3 CD<a OL 03 � S � 0 7 m O ( rt (D .r0 o ° 0, 0 101+ v,<o,� j00 rt33 CL p � 7 a 30 7 0r:t0A CD 0 (D� CD CD 70 cco h i �, rl 355 360 7y 365 i -- 370 �/- 375 i ,2.nd Ave.. -S.. CO cv