Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
99-100499 (2)
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th AVENUE N.E.,SUITE 110—BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H.BISHOP P E Presiders TELEPHONE(425)455-5320 DAVID H.ENDER.P.E.Vice President FACSIMILE(425)453.7180 January 11, 2000 Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 - 1st Way South Federal Way, WA. 98003-6210 RE: Hawthorn Suites - Federal Way UP399-002 and SEP 99-0003 Response to City's Comments to Traffic Analysis Dear Mr. Long: We have prepared this letter in response to your December 22, 1999 Interoffice Memorandum to Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner. This Memorandum contains your comments to our Hawthorn Suites - Federal Way UP 399-002 and SEP 99-0003 Response to City Comments to Traffic Analysis dated September 9, 1999. Your comments and our responses follow: 1. The City concurs with the trip generation calculation contained in the report which is based on 1TE LU 310 (Hotel) at 0.61 peak trips per room. Comment acknowledged 2. The horizon year used in the LOS analysis is incorrect. The five-year horizon can only be utilized, if a new or revision to existing traffic signals is needed as result of the proposed project. The LOS analysis and mitigation fees for all impacted intersections shall be recalculated using traffic volumes from the expected date of full development of the site. Defining a horizon year based on the level of improvements could entail several iterations to ascertain the required level of improvements needed. Defaulting to a further out horizon year provides a more conservative analysis. However, in accordance with our telephone conversation we have recalculated the pro-rata shares based on the opening date horizon year, 2001, based on a telephone conversation with the project proponent. Following is the revised pro- rata share calculations. a. TIP #2 - S. 336th St.: 13th Ave. S. - 18th Ave. S.: Widen to 4/5 lanes, cost estimate $693,500 • C 1-ProjecfsIF PROJECTS1F0846981F0846988.doc Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY QI January 11, 2000 Page 2 18 PM peak project trips entering intersection = 0.38% 4,693 total 2001 PM peak trips entering intersection b. TIP #11 - SR-99 @ S. 330th St.: Signalization, add left-turn lanes. Cost estimate $240,000.; construction 2000. 14 PM peak project trips entering intersection = 0.42% 3,350 total 2001 PM peak trips entering intersection c. TIP #14 - SR-99: S. 324th St. - S. 340th St.: Construct HOV lanes. Cost estimate $11,672,000.; construction 2002. The approximate length of this improvement is one mile. One quarter of this length is south of S. 336th Street. Thus proportioning the cost to the segments yields. S. 324th - 336th Streets $11,672,000 x 75% = $8,754,000 S. 336th — 340th Streets $11,672,000 x 25% _ $2,918,000 The Hawthorn Suites development's impact are as follows: S. 324th to 336th Street 14 total project PM peak hour segment trips = 0.42% (3,132 [336th] x 3,479 [324th]) - 2 total average PM peak hour S. 336th to 340th Street 18 total project PM peak hour segment trips = 0.61 (2,778 [336th] + 3,126[16th]) - 2 total average PM peak hour segment trips We acknowledge that the City would calculate the actual fees based on the above percentages. We understand that any fees that may be paid would be refunded if not used for the identified street project within six years. 3. SR 99/Site access. Actual turning movement count should be used in the LOS analysis. The Taco Bell traffic volumes were calculated using Trip Generation data. Conducting a manual field count would not result in any substantive changes to the calculated level of service. The westbound movement LOS is B with very little average delay. Additionally, right turns onto S. 348th St. get motorists to the C:1-Projecfs\F PROJECTS1F0846981F0846988.doc Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ql January 11, 2000 Page 3 same I/S as left turns onto SR 99. Thus the left turn egress movement onto SR 99 should remain minimal. 4. Please explain why different methodology was used in the LOS analysis for the SR 18/SR 161 intersection. The SR 18/SR 161 I/S accommodates high traffic volumes with large v/c ratios. At high v/c ratios over-saturated conditions occur. Thus the SIGNAL94 evaluate function is used for analysis. Reference attached NOTES ON LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS USING SIGNAL94 VI L1.4, JUNE 1995, SOFTWARE. 5. SR 18/SR 161 (Enchanted Parkway) LOS analysis. This intersection is currently a coordinated signal operating at 140 seconds cycle length with LOS E and v/c ratio exceeding 1.00, not LOS D as indicated in the TIA. The LOS analysis for this intersection has been analyzed incorrectly thus resulting in better LOS. Currently, there are no westbound, eastbound, and northbound overlap phases. A reduction may be applied for right turn on red. Please recalculate the LOS for the existing, future with and future without project and submit all data for city review. We have recalculated the LOS per your request. The calculations are attached. Of note: the northbound to eastbound right turn movement was removed from the analysis. This movement is channelized and controlled by a yield sign and thus should not have been included in our original analysis. The results of our analysis indicate that the I/S is currently operating at LOS E and is expected to drop to F in 2003 without or with the project. Improving the LOS to E in 2003 could be achieved via a better allocation of green time. This issue was discussed in our Hawthorn Suites - Federal Way UP 399-002 and SEP 99-0003 Response to City's Comments to Traffic Analysis. Summary and Conclusions This letter responds to your comments to Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner. No material changes to our Hawthorn Inn - Federal Way Traffic Impact Analysis result. However, per your request the pro-rata share percents have been recalculated. The original December 2, 1998 report and recalculated pro-rata share percentages are as follows: 12.02.98 Report Recalculated a. S. 336th St., 13th to 18th Avenues S. 0.37% 0.38% b. S. 330th St. at SR 99 0.40% 0.42% c. SR 99, S. 324th-340th Streets i) S. 324th - 336th Streets 0.41% 0.42% ii) S. 336th -340th Streets 0.59% 0.61% C:1-Projects\F PROJECTS1F084698\F0846988.doc Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst t. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY January 11, 2000 Page 4 If you have any questions please call me at (425) 455-5320 or email me at mjacobs@tranplaneng.com. Very Truly Yours, < K1. J^c0 °v -0441,__ s TRANSPORTATION PLANNING a & ENGINEERING, INC. z. A.s., 0/./(.00 =` 'L Mark J. Jacobs, P.E., P.T.O.E. [EXPIRES 4r3i 00 _ 1 Associate MJJ:sv cc: James Mulloy, Federal Way Investments, L.L.C. George Watson, Lindquist Architects C:1-ProjectslF PROJECTS1F0846981F084698B.doc APPENDIX -cam-YY U1 - 111-' L iriclqu isL bUY YZ 1 / /b P . 0/ interoffice MEMORANDUM Federal Way Dept. of Public Works Traffic Services Division To: Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner • From; Sarady Long,Traffic Analyst " ?— Subject: Hawthorn Suites; UP399-0002 and SRP99-0003 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Date: December 22, 1999 This memorandum provides review comments from the Traffic Division on the revised Transportation Impact Analysis (11A) for the proposed hawthorn Suites Hotel located on the southeast corner of S 34814 Street and SR 99_ The TIA needs to be revised to incorporate the following comments. Transportation Impact Analysis(TIA) 1. The City concurs with the trip generation calculation contained in the report which is based on ITE LU 310(Motel)at 0.61 p.m. peak trips per room. 2. The horizon year used in tho LOS analysis is incorrect. The five-year horizon can only be utilized, if a new or revision to existing traffic signals is needed as result of the proposed project.The LOS analysis and mitigation fees for all impacted Intersections shall be recalculated using traffic volumes from the expected date of full development of the site. 3. SR 99/Site access. Actual turning movement count should be used in the LOS analysis. 4_ Please explain why diffeowt methodology was used in the LOS analysis for the SR 1 S/SR 161 intersection. S. SR 18/SR 161 (Enchanted Parkway)LOS analysis.This intersection is currently a coordinated signal operating at 140 seconds cycle length with LOS E and v/c ratio exrPorling 1.00,not LOS D as indicated in the TIA. The LOS analysis for this intersection has been analyzed incorrectly thus resulting in better LOS. Currently, there are no westbound,eastbound, and northbound overlap phases. A reduction may be applied for right-turn on red. Please recalculate the LOS for the existing,future with and future without project and submit all data for city review, 1 7ec-29-99 01 : 11P Lindquist Architects bOY 922 1775 P .Uti State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)Checklist 14. TRANSpQRTA11ON 6. Please revise the SEPA checklist to be consistent with the TIA and the site plan. The TIA and the site plan show two driveways to serve the proposed development,however.the SEPA checklist indicated only one. L:V!NOYS\DO ME SHP99 QO.93\TP12Yl94.do. • q - k, NOTES ON LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS USING SIGNAL 94 V1 L1.4, JUNE 1995, SOFTWARE CALCULATION OF DELAY Reference: pg C-2 of Signal 94 Reference Manual "The 'stopped time delay' calculations made in the worksheets exactly match those specified in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) in order to determine level of service. These calculations do not reflect over-saturated conditions very well, as documented in the HCM. The EVALUATE command calculates 'total delay' in a manner that is more suitable for considering over-saturated conditions. This method follows the method that is simulated in the TRANSYT-7F program for external, non- coordinated links. In general, when the V/C value is less than 1.00, this calculation is the traditional Webster's delay formula. When the V/C value exceeds 1 .00, TRANSYT-7F adds an additional delay component to account for queues which are not entirely dissipated at the end of each green indication. This process is matched in the 'total delay' computation of the EVALUATE output". Reference: October 2, 1996 phone conversation Vince Geglia, Transportation Engineer, TP&E, with Dennis Strong, P.E., (President of Strong Corp. and author of Signal 94) Mr. Strong stated that when the Signal 94 level of service calculation output contains the note "@ expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE)", the EVALUATE command should be used to calculate delay. Furthermore, Mr. Strong stated that the EVALUATE command calculates the total delay in seconds per vehicle. Total delay includes the deceleration, stopped, and acceleration delay. Studies have shown that the total delay is approximately 1.3 times the stopped delay. Chapter 9 of the HCM relates LOS to stopped delay. Therefore, the total delay as calculated by the EVALUATE command In Signal 94, should be divided by 1.3 to convert to stopped delay. The resulting stopped delay can then be compared to the stopped delay LOS values in Table 9-1 of the HCM. Signa194.Nof 3 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 01/04/00 SR 18/SR 161 10:20:09 EXISTING (CI18161E) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0 . 92 Vehicle Delay 48.5 Level of Service E+ Sq 0 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 I Phase 6 1 * * + + + * * + + + ++++ ++++ / \ <* * +> <+ + <++++ <++++ v v ++++ v ++++ North * *> <+ + +> ++++> ****> 1 * * + + + ++++ ++++ * * + + + v v G/C=0.136 G/C=0. 007 G/C=0.107 G/C=0.257 G/C=0.171 G/C=0.107 G= 19.0" G= 1.0" G= 15.0" G= 36 .0" G= 24 .0" G= 15.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=17 .1% OFF=21.4% OFF=35.7% OFF=65.0% OFF=85.7% C=140 sec G=110.0 sec = 78.6% Y=30.0 sec = 21.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane (Width/ I g/C Service Rate Adj I I HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) ®E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 65.6 F l TH+RT 24/2 10.341 0. 193 1 700 l 729 1.031 l 70. 9 l *F l 579 ftl LT 24/2 0.314 0. 150 1 511 505 0.951 58.0 E 422 ft S Approach 41.3 E+ TH 1 LT 1 24/2 0.293 10 .121 1 1 404 1 331 0.770 1 44.2 1 *E+1 286 ftl E Approach 48.5 E+ RT 12/1 0.327 0.479 589 725 242 0.334 14 .7 B 248 ft TH 24/2 0.544 0.479 1564 1783 1883 1.056 56 .1 E 966 ft LT 24/2 0.368 0.271 141 961 880 0.916 41.4 *E+ 631 ft W Approach 38.0 D RT 12/1 0.339 0.329 251 504 281 0.555 26.0 D+ 371 ft TH 24/2 0.405 0.329 645 1224 1163 0. 950 40. 9 *E+ 768 ft LT 12/1 0 .265 0.121 1 188 41 0 .191 35.8 *D 71 ft 4 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 01/04/00 SR 18/SR 161 10:20:18 EXISTING (CI18161E) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC [Ver 1.21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 .0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 5 8 5 4 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 74 0 87 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 22 610 446 294 1632 777 0 391 295 348 1030 38 WIDTHS 0.0 24 .0 24 . 0 12 .0 24 .0 24 .0 0.0 24 .0 24.0 12 .0 24.0 12 .0 LANES 0 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 1 UTILIZATIONS 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2 .0 2 .0 2 .0 2.0 2 .0 2 .0 2 .0 2 .0 2.0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0.91 0. 91 0. 91 0. 91 0. 91 0 . 91 0 . 92 0 . 92 0.92 0. 93 0.93 0.93 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5. 0 5.0 5. 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 MINIMUMS 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3668 3539 1515 3725 3539 0 3688 3539 1541 3725 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 19.00 1.00 15.00 36 .00 24 .00 15.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5. 00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 2 8 11 12 6 11 EXCESS 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 2 1 2 7 8 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 3 7 8 9 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 4 4 5 6 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 5 10 11 4 5 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 6 10 11 12 0 0 0 5 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 01/04/00 SR 18/SR 161 10:14:56 2003 W/O PROJECT (CI18161F) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 0 I Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 A * * + + + A * * + + + ++++ ++++ / \ <* * +> <+ + <++++ <++++ A v v ++++ A A v ++++ North * *> <+ + +> ++++> ****> 1 * * + + + ++++ ++++ * * + + + v v G/C=0.136 G/C=0.007 G/C=0.107 G/C=0.257 G/C=0.171 G/C=0.107 G= 19.0" G= 1.0" G= 15.0" G= 36 . 0" G= 24 .0" G= 15.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5 .0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=17 .1% OFF=21.4% OFF=35.7% OFF=65.0% OFF=85.7% C=140 sec G=110.0 sec = 78.6% Y=30.0 sec = 21.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0 .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 27 821 571 271 2092 971 0 523 369 316 1302 45 7308 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 24/2 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 36 32 34 59 38 0 31 30 35 43 27 g/C Used: % 0 19 15 48 48 27 0 16 12 33 33 12 SV @E: vph 0 701 511 725 1783 961 0 591 404 504 1224 188 7592 Svc Lvl:LOS F F C+ F E E+ E+ D+ F D F Deg Sat:v/c 0. 00 1.20 1.08 0 .37 1.17 1.01 0.00 0. 86 0.86 0.63 1.06 0.21 1.03 Avg Del:s/v 0.0126.3100.5 24 .4 99. 9 72.4 0.0 67 . 6 75.3 42.5 79.2 56.6 86 .6 Tot Del:min 0 446 239 28 871 293 0 147 116 56 430 11 2637 # Stops:veh 0 212 142 43 523 242 0 127 90 67 325 10 1781 Max Que:veh 0 79 45 11 150 57 0 34 25 17 83 3 504 Max Que: ft 0 1005 571 278 1892 721 0 430 319 418 1055 78 1892 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 1419 3334 892 1663 7308 Svc Lv1:LOS F F E+ F F Deg Sat:v/c 1.15 1.06 0.86 0. 96 1.03 Avg Del:s/v 115.9 85.8 70.8 71.6 ;A.1 86 . 6 Tot Del:min 685 1192 263 497 ' (, 2637 # Stops:veh 354 808 217 402 (o" 1781 Max Que:veh 124 218 59 103 504 Max Que: ft 1005 1892 430 1055 1892 6 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 01/04/00 SR 18/SR 161 10:15:09 2003 W/O PROJECT (CI18161F) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 . 0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 5 8 5 4 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 82 0 98 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 24 712 504 329 1813 858 0 458 329 392 1153 42 WIDTHS 0.0 24 . 0 24.0 12 .0 24.0 24 . 0 0.0 24 .0 24.0 12.0 24 .0 12 .0 LANES 0 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 1 UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2 .0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2 .0 2 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0.91 0. 91 0 . 91 0. 91 0. 91 0. 91 0. 92 0. 92 0. 92 0.93 0 . 93 0. 93 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 MINIMUMS 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3669 3539 1515 3725 3539 0 3688 3539 1541 3725 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 19.00 1.00 15.00 36.00 24.00 15.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 2 8 11 12 6 11 EXCESS 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 2 1 2 7 8 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 3 7 8 9 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 4 4 5 6 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 5 10 11 4 5 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 6 10 11 12 0 0 0 7 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 01/04/00 SR 18/SR 161 10:12:53 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI18161W) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 0 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 1 **/** * * + + + A A * * + + + ++++ ++++ / \ <* * +> <+ + <++++ <++++ A v v ++++ A A v ++++ North * *> <+ + +> ++++> ****> 1 * * + + + ++++ ++++ * * + + + v v G/C=0.136 G/C=0.007 G/C=0.107 G/C=0.257 G/C=0.171 G/C=0.107 G= 19.0" G= 1.0" G= 15.0" G= 36.0" G= 24 .0" G= 15.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0. 0% OFF=17 . 1% OFF=21.4% OFF=35.7% OFF=65.0% OFF=85.7% C=140 sec G=110.0 sec = 78. 6% Y=30 .0 sec = 21.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 27 823 584 271 2104 971 0 523 370 316 1303 45 7337 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 24/2 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 12/1 g/C Rgd@C:% 0 36 32 34 59 38 0 31 30 35 43 27 g/C Used: % 0 19 15 48 48 27 0 16 12 33 33 12 SV @E: vph 0 701 511 725 1783 961 0 591 404 504 1224 188 7592 Svc Lvl:LOS F F C+ F E E+ E D+ F D F Deg Sat:v/c 0.00 1.20 1.10 0.37 1.18 1.01 0. 00 0.86 0. 86 0 .63 1.07 0.21 1.03 Avg De1:s/v 0.0127 .0106.3 24 .4101.9 72.4 0.0 67 .6 75.8 42 .5 79.4 56.6 87 .8 Tot Del:min 0 450 259 28 893 293 0 147 117 56 431 11 2685 # Stops:veh 0 212 146 43 526 242 0 127 91 67 325 10 1789 Max Que:veh 0 80 48 11 153 57 0 34 25 17 84 3 512 Max Que: ft 0 1011 612 278 1930 721 0 430 320 418 1058 78 1930 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 1434 3346 893 1664 7337 Svc Lvl:LOS F F E+ F F Deg Sat:v/c 1.16 1.07 0.86 0. 96 1.03 Avg Del:s/v 118. 6 87 .1 71.0 71. 8 j15 87 .8 Tot Del:min 709 1214 264 498 ,- 2685 # Stops:veh 358 811 218 402 (-.) 1789 Max Que:veh 128 221 59 104 512 Max Que: ft 1011 1930 430 1058 1930 8 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 01/04/00 SR 18/SR 161 10:13:15 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI18161W) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 .0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 5 8 5 4 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 82 0 98 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 24 713 516 329 1824 858 0 458 330 392 1154 42 WIDTHS 0.0 24.0 24.0 12.0 24.0 24 .0 0.0 24.0 24. 0 12.0 24 .0 12 .0 LANES 0 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 1 UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2 .0 2.0 2. 0 2 . 0 2.0 2. 0 2.0 2 .0 2.0 2 .0 2. 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0. 91 0. 91 0.91 0.91 0 .91 0.91 0 . 92 0 .92 0.92 0. 93 0.93 0. 93 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5. 0 MINIMUMS 15.0 15. 0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15. 0 15.0 15.0 15.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3669 3539 1515 3725 3539 0 3688 3539 1541 3725 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 19.00 1.00 15.00 36.00 24.00 15.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 2 8 11 12 6 11 EXCESS 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 2 1 2 7 8 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 3 7 8 9 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 4 4 5 6 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 5 10 11 4 5 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 6 10 11 12 0 0 0 9 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 01/04/00 SR 18/SR 161 10:09 :40 2003 W/ PROJECT IMPROVED TIMING (CI18161I) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 0 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 I Phase 6 A * * + + + A • / \ <* * +> <+ + <++++ <++++ A v v ++++ A A v ++++ North * *> <+ + +> ++++> ****> * * + + + ++++ ++++ * * + + + v v G/C=0.157 G/C=0.007 G/C=0.093 G/C=0.250 G/C=0.229 G/C=0.050 G= 22.0" G= 1.0" G= 13 .0" G= 35.0" G= 32.0" G= 7 .0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5. 0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=19.3% OFF=23 .6% OFF=36.4% OFF=65.0% OFF=91.4% C=140 sec G=110.0 sec = 78.6% Y=30.0 sec = 21.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 27 823 584 271 2104 971 0 523 370 316 1303 45 7337 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 24/2 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 36 32 34 59 38 0 31 30 35 43 27 g/C Used: % 0 21 17 53 53 26 0 15 11 33 33 6 SV @E: vph 0 786 593 801 1969 935 0 534 351 504 1224 89 7786 Svc Lvl:LOS FEBE F E F D+ F E+ F Deg Sat:v/c 0.00 1. 08 0.96 0.34 1.07 1.04 0.00 0. 95 0.98 0.63 1.07 0.40 0. 99 Avg Del:s/v 0.0 94.4 75.0 20.0 64 . 9 79.1 0.0105.2 88.1 42.5 79.4 65.9 75.0 Tot Del:min 0 334 183 23 569 320 0 229 136 56 431 12 2293 # Stops:veh 0 212 145 39 526 242 0 130 92 67 325 11 1789 Max Que:veh 0 64 38 10 106 63 0 35 26 17 84 3 446 Max Que: ft 0 810 476 251 1340 791 0 437 325 418 1058 83 1340 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 1434 3346 893 1664 7337 Svc Lvl:LOS F E F F E Deg Sat:v/c 1.03 1.00 0.96 0.96 0. 99 Avg Del:s/v 86 .5 65.4 98.1 72 .0 n 75.0 Tot Del:min 517 912 365 499 ; I - 2293 # Stops:veh 357 807 222 403 5 1:1 1789 Max Que:veh 102 179 61 104 446 Max Que: ft 810 1340 437 1058 1340 10 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 01/04/00 SR 18/SR 161 10:10:55 2003 W/ PROJECT IMPROVED TIMING (CI18161I) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 .0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 5 8 5 4 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 82 0 98 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 24 713 516 329 1824 858 0 458 330 392 1154 42 WIDTHS 0.0 24.0 24 . 0 12.0 24.0 24.0 0.0 24 .0 24.0 12.0 24.0 12.0 LANES 0 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 1 UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2 .0 2. 0 2.0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0. 91 0. 91 0.91 0 .91 0. 91 0.91 0. 92 0 .92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.93 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 5.0 5. 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 MINIMUMS 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3669 3539 1515 3725 3539 0 3688 3539 1541 3725 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 22.00 1.00 13 .00 35.00 32.00 7 .00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 2 8 11 12 6 11 EXCESS 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 2 1 2 7 8 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 3 7 8 9 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 4 4 5 6 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 5 10 11 4 5 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 6 10 11 12 0 0 0 11 CITY OF 33530 First Way South FEDERAL WAY DEC 0 2 1999 FederalWay WA 98003 Phone(253) 661-4000 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know an answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know" or does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for Non-Project Proposals: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals,even though questions may be answered"does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non-Project Actions (part D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. 1 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] , CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST BCE JOB NO.6780 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Hawthorn Suites 2. Name of Applicant: KC Investments,LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: KC Investments, LLC 1515 South 350th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Contact: Daniel K. Balmelli,P.E. Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue S. Kent, Washington 98032 (425) 251-6222 4. Date checklist prepared: January 13, 1999 Revised November 17, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): Construction is anticipated to commence immediately upon approval of building permits for the proposed 65 room Hawthorn Suites project. The future 18 room addition is anticipated to be completed within 3 years of the initial phase. 2 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. The proposed Hawthorn Suites project includes a future addition of 18 rooms at the south end of the proposed building as shown on the site plan. All impacts from the ultimate 83 room project have been analyzed under this application. Some additional parking will also be constructed as part of the 18 room addition on property adjacent and west of the site. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Traffic Study Geotech Study Level I Drainage Study 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. None to our knowledge. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. The proposal is subject to a Process III Site Plan Approval. Building and associated utility permits are required for construction. Other permits include grading permit, site work and utility permit, and environmental determination. A boundary line adjustment will also be processed to adjust the existing lot line of the overall site for the proposed project and future development plans. 11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal includes the construction of a new 3-story,65-room hotel facility of approximately 30,000 square feet of building area with approximately 80 parking stalls and a future addition of 18 rooms. The area for the proposed project consists of approximately 2.06 acres of a 4.9 acre site. Additional shared parking will be provided when the 18 room addition is constructed on property adjacent to the site. The exact layout of the shared parking is not known at this time,however a parking and access plan will be submitted for approval with the building permit application for the 18 room addition. Total required parking for the 83 room project is 83 stalls. Proposed access to the hotel will be from South 348th Street by an existing access easement to the west of the existing Taco Bell facility. 3 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is located immediately south of the existing Secoma Lanes Bowling Center,between Secoma Lanes and the existing McDonald's Restaurant which fronts on South 348th Street. The project faces Pacific Highway S.(SR 99),however is located approximately 260 feet east of SR99. Access will be provided by an existing paved access located immediately to the east of the existing Taco Bell facility from South 348th Street. The property is a portion of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 20, Township 21 North,Range 4 East,Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington (see attached legal descriptions). 4 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,mountainous,other . The site is generally flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? The existing site is generally flat with slopes of approximately 2 percent or less to the south. Steeper slopes of approximately 10 to 20 percent abut the site along the south and east property lines. The developed site will have grades of approximately 2 to 5 percent in the pavement areas. Some rockeries or retaining walls will be constructed along the south and east side to match existing grades. c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand, gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soil classification for this site per the SCS soils classification maps is Everett Series, Everett-Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (EwC). The site has been graded in the past and surfaced in gravel. • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. There are no indications of unstable soils on the site or within the immediate vicinity. e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading activity for this application is limited to the 2.06 acre parcel. Grading will be required for installation of utilities,building pad,and associated parking. The approximate quantity of onsite excavation and fill is 2,600 cubic yards to obtain a balanced earthwork for the 5 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT site. It is not anticipated that any import or export of fill will be required. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion hazard should be minimal since the site was previously graded and is relatively flat. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 75 percent of the project site will be covered by impervious surfaces including buildings and parking,after the project is constructed. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be designed and implemented during the construction phase of the project, in accordance with the City of Federal Way requirements,to reduce and control erosion and other impacts to earth. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e., dust,automobile,odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust may occur during the construction phase, and normal emissions from construction equipment will occur. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,generally describe. None to our knowledge. 6 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any. Water trucks will be provided during construction as required to control dust, and construction equipment will be required to meet emissions standards. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. The site is within approximately 1/2 mile of a Class 2 stream, to the west, draining into the Hylebos wetlands. 2) Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet) the described water? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. No. 7 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the types of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities,if known. No groundwater withdrawal or discharge will occur for completion of the project 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals...;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No discharge of waste is proposed. c. Water Runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including stormwater)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source of runoff from the completed project will be rainfall from the building rooftop and from paved parking and drive areas. Stormwater runoff generated by the proposed project will be collected and conveyed by catch basins to a stormwater detention and water quality treatment system, then discharge to the existing city storm system within South 348th Street. 8 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts,if any. A stormwater collection, conveyance, detention and water quality system will be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of Federal Way requirements to reduce and control impacts from surface water runoff. The project will incorporate stormwater control measures in conjunction with the recommendations of the Hylebos Creek Basin Recommendation Number BW-2. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other shrubs X grass(scrub grass and exotic weeds) pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bulrush,skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site is predominately level with a graded gravel surface, which was previously used for open air storage. Any vegetation on the site would be considered Pioneer/Volunteer scrub material. The small amount of existing vegetation will be removed for development of the site. 9 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any. The proposed project will provide landscaping as required per city code including a percentage of native vegetation. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds an animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X birds: hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver,other fish,bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. The Puget Sound area lies within the Pacific Flyway Migration Route and,as such,the adjacent Hylebos wetlands to the southwest would serve as temporary or permanent residence to migratory waterfowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any. Project landscaping will incorporate native and ornamental vegetation species which would serve as wildlife habitat and forage. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing,etc. 10 6780.003 [HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Natural gas and electricity will provide heating, cooling and power needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. Not to our knowledge. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any. The proposed project will be constructed in accordance with Washington State Energy codes. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None, other than normal police, fire, and medical services already available in the area. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any. None are proposed. b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)? Adjacent commercial businesses to the east may produce some noise during daylight hours. Other than normal traffic 11 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT noise adjacent to the property on Pacific Highway South and South 348th Street, no adverse noise is anticipated. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. On a short term basis,normal construction noise would occur during the construction phase. On a long term basis, no significant noise is anticipated to be created by the project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any. No specific measures are proposed. However, proposed landscaping will help reduce noise impacts. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently, and has for the past several years,been vacant. At one time,landscape railroad tie timbers were stored on a portion of the property located west of the project site within approximately 150 feet of SR99. The proposed Hawthorne Suites site lies within a leveled, graded area surrounded by commercial business. To the north is the present Secoma Lanes Bowling Center. To the east,are several commercial businesses,typically associated with auto repair and maintenance, and an equipment rental facility. To the south are the McDonald's and Taco Bell Restaurants. To the southwest,is a single residential property which has periodically been occupied and unoccupied. Approximately 200 to 300 feet of vacant land lies between the proposed hotel site and Pacific Highway South, to the west. At the opposite side(west)of Pacific Highway South is a gasoline station and mini-storage facility. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. Not to our knowledge. 12 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no existing structures on the site. Existing chain link fencing and gates are located along the north,south and east property lines. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No, however, some of the existing fencing and gates will be removed. e. What is the current zoning designation of the site? Current zoning classification of this site is Community Business. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation for the site? Community Business. g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. The site lies within an area of enhanced stormwater infiltration associated with the Hylebos sub-basin. No other sensitive area designation is classified for this property. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The project will employ approximately 8 to 10 full time staff. The proposed 65-unit facility could potentially provide short term services for approximately 130 people at maximum occupancy. At maximum build-out with the future addition of 83 units, the maximum occupancy could be approximately 170 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. 13 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any. None are proposed. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any. Appropriate setbacks, buffers, landscaping and vegetation enhancement according to the established code standards for this zoning district will help insure the proposal is compatible with the existing land use plans. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle,or low income housing. Sixty-five short term middle income hotel rooms are proposed for limited occupancy. b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle,or low income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any. None are proposed. The facility would target short term stay and overnight occupancy of travelers and business users. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The tallest height of the proposed structure (ridge line) is approximately 47 feet above the first finish floor elevation. Exterior building materials are proposed to be siding,asphalt roof shingles and brick wainscot trim. 14 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Although views from existing businesses located west of the site would be altered by the proposed hotel building, no views will be obstructed since the adjacent businesses do not have any specific views across the area where the project is proposed. There is a potential view of Mount Rainier southwest of the site. However,this view is not obstructed from adjacent businesses by the project.. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any. None are proposed. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Site lighting will be present at night. Cut-off type parking lighting will be used for the project. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any. Cut-off exterior parking lot lighting will be provided to reduce and control light and glare impacts. Also,proposed landscaping will help defuse light and possible glare impacts. 15 6780.003[HBM/phPosd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 12. Recreation a. What designation and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Recreational opportunities nearby include the West Hylebos Wetlands State Park, and the Weyerhauser King County Aquatic Center. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. The proposed project will include indoor recreation facilities including a swimming pool for use by the guests. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state or local preservation registers to be on or next to the site. If so,generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological, scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any. The proposed hotel facility will provide a quiet, minimal impact use to the area. 16 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on-site plans,if any. South 348th Street provides the only access to the site at this time. An additional access to the west from SR99 is planned when future development occurs on the remaining±3 acres between the site and SR99. SR 99 and South 348th Streets are major arterials serving Federal Way proper. To the east,approximately 300 feet,is SR 161, which provides transportation to the south and Pierce County. Approximately 1/4 mile to the east is Interstate 5. South 348th Street transitions into SR 18,providing transportation to the east. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Both South 348th Street and Pacific Highway South provide public transit routes which would serve the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The currently proposed project will provide approximately 80 parking spaces. No parking will be eliminated. Joint use parking will be proposed in the future on adjacent property west of the site when the additional 18 units are constructed. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No new roads or improvements are anticipated for the project. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? If so,generally describe. No. 17 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. The completed 83 unit hotel project would generate approximately 665 average vehicle trips per week day. It is anticipated that peak volumes will occur during early morning and evening commuter traffic periods. (Please refer to the traffic impact analysis prepared by TP&E included in this submittal.) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any. Existing improvements and mitigation measures as recommended in the traffic impact analysis included in this submittal will reduce and control transportation impacts. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. The project will result in some increased need for public services such as fire protection,police protection and emergency medical services. However, these services are currently available and serve existing developments adjacent to the proposed project. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. None are proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water,refuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other. All utilities are currently available to serve the project: Electricity: Puget Sound Energy Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Water/Sewer: Lakehaven Utility District Refuse: Federal Way Disposal 18 6780.003 [HBM/ph/bsd] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Phone: U.S. West Communications Cable TV: TCI Cablevision of Washington b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilities providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All utilities will be extended from existing services located within adjacent streets and utility easements abutting the site. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete t he best of my knowledge. I under- stand the lead age is r ing them its deci ion. Signature: (Z_2 F1c) Date 19 6780.003[HBM/ph/bsd] • Hawthorn Suites - Federal Way UP399-002 and SEP 99-0003 Response to City's Comments to Traffic Analysis -. n Prepared for DEC 021999 Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 - 15t Way South Federal Way, WA. 98003-6210 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING&ENGINEERING,INC. MARK J. JACOBS, P.E. Associate Telephone(425)455-5320 Fax(425)453-7180 2101-112th Ave.N.E.,Suite 110 email:mjacobe@tranplaneng.com Bellevue,Washington 98004 Transportation Planning & Engineering , Inc . 2101 - 112th Avenue N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (425) 455-5320 Hawthorn Suites - Federal Way UP399-002 and SEP 99-0003 Response to City's Comments to Traffic Analysis Prepared for Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 - 1st Way South Federal Way, WA. 98003-6210 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th Ave. N.E. Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: (425) 455-5320 Fax: (425) 453-7180 E-mail: mjacobs@tranplaneng.com d41: " i._._._1 7 ()i(t -- 1)111'C.1)(s. n '1_` ' TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - I t2th A•JEtdUE N E . SUITE 110 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H BISHOP P E Preside'I TELEPHONE(425)455-5320 DAVID H.ENGER.PE V„e Pres,r,"„' September 9, 1999 FACSIMILE (425)453-7180 Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33530 - 1st Way South Federal Way, WA. 98003-6210 RE: Hawthorn Suites - Federal Way UP399-002 and SEP 99-0003 Response to City's Comments to Traffic Analysis Dear Mr. Long: We have prepared this letter in response to the City's comment to our Country Inn & Suites - Federal Way Traffic Impact Analysis dated December 3, 1998. The City's comments and our responses follow: 1. Trip Generation and Distribution The trip generation calculations contained in our December 3, 1998 report were based on a 65-unit project. A second phase of the project could add 18 more rooms. The trip generation calculations contained our report used both hotel occupancy data and the number of rooms. The attached Table 1.6 Competitive Hotel Market Performance shows that the average hotel occupancy in the Federal Way area to be 73.7 percent. The following table provides the trip generation for an 83-unit hotel project. TRIP TRIPS TIPS TIME PERIOD GENERATION ENTERING EXRT NG TOTAL RATE Occupied Rooms, 61 (83 Rooms X 73.7%) Average T = 8.92X 272 (50%) 272 (50%) 544 Weekday AM Peak Hour T = 0.67X 28 (58%) 20 (42%) 48 PM Peak Hour T = 0.71X 21 (49°/%) 22 (51%) 43 Rooms, 83 Average T = 8.23X 333 (50%) 333 (50%) 666 Weekday AM Peak Hour T = 0.56X 27 (61%) 18 (39%) 45 PM Peak Hour T = 0.61X 27 (53%) 24 (47%) 51 Where X = Number of Rooms T = Trips C: -1',o/eels F 6R 1;JE:CES FOE.:r?c`C54EARespcnsellr dc_ Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY September 9, 1999 ,I Page 2 Our December 3, 1998 report evaluated the traffic impact of 46 PM peak hour trips. Using the hotel occupancy data would result in slightly fewer trips than previously studied. However, using the number of rooms ITE data results in adding five more trips. These five more trips would not impact the analysis contained in our December 3, 1998 report. Figures 6M and 7M show the revised trip generation and future traffic volumes that result. No changes to the calculated pro-rata share percents result due to the slight increase in projected trips. 2. Number of access points It is our understanding that the site can be accessed via two easements. One of which is onto SR 99 and the other is onto S. 348th Street. 3. Horizon Years. The horizon year evaluated on the traffic report was 2003. Our traffic analysis was prepared in 1998. Thus, a five year horizon was utilized. The five year horizon is consistent with our understanding of the City's Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines which indicates a five year horizon for a project mitigation impacts to traffic signals. 4. S. 348th St./SR 99 and SR 18/SR 161 Intersection Accident Rate The accident data provided by the City for use in our December 3, 1998 traffic study was for the time period January 1, 1994 to December 31 , 1996. As stated in our report, both intersections were being reconstructed with the work completed in the Fall of 1995. Including accidents that occurred prior to the completion of the street improvements would not be appropriate. Recent discussions with WSDOT staff indicate that newer, post 1996 data may become available later this year. The time gap is due to glitches in their new computer program. 5. SR 99/Site Access LOS Analysis A LOS analysis of the SR 99/access easement is attached. The analysis incorporates estimated traffic volumes for the Taco Bell restaurant. These volumes were derived using the data contained in the Trip Generation. The results of our analysis, Highway Capacity Software Release 3.1, shows the egress movement onto SR 99 would operate at LOS B with an average delay of 11.0 seconds per vehicle. The calculation sheets are attached. The result using Highway Capacity Software release 2.1 f also showed the egress movement Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY September 9, 1999 Page 3 operating at LOS B. Release 2.1f is a DOS based program which no longer prints from my computer. 6. S. 324th St./SR 99 LOS Analysis The LOS calculation contained in Country Inn & Suites Hotel - Federal Way Traffic Impact Analysis is consistent with our analysis conducted in both Golden Stone Office Building - Federal Way Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 30, 1998 and Washington Park Office Building - Federal Way Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 10, 1998. Both these reports were reviewed by the City and/or City representative. We are unaware of any comments regarding the methodology and timing inputs used for these previous reports. However, we have recalculated, using the SIGNAL 94 software per your request, the LOS using the City's suggested timing parameters. The recalculated LOS is E with an average delay of 45.1 seconds per vehicle. Table 1 R tabulates the result. The LOS calculation sheets are attached. 7. S. 330th St./SR 99 Peak Hour Factors The default peak hours were used. Default values are 0.95 for unsignalized and 0.90 for signalized intersections. Regardless of the PHF used the analysis indicates that side street left turn and thru traffic has to wait. The installation of a traffic control signal and addition of left turn pockets on S. 330th St. would dramatically improve the S. 330th St. approach operations at SR 99. Overall the calculated LOS would be very good with the proposed traffic control signal. 8. S. 336th St./SR 99 Capacity Analysis The recalculated LOS for the intersection, with City proposed improvements, is attached. Table 1 R shows the result of our analysis. 9. Pipeline Projects The traffic generated by "Pipeline Projects" is included in the horizon year, 2003, traffic volumes. The projects included were: • Rainier View Plaza • Waremart Retail • Sunnyside Motel • Golden Stone Office Building • Washington Park Office Building Copies of the trip distribution data for the above projects are attached. C -Projects.F PROJECTS F084698 F0846AResponseltr ecc Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ,( September 9, 1999 'I Page 4 10. Count Data The count data used in our report is attached. 11. S. 348`h St. and SR 99 LOS calculations We have re-calculated the LOS, calculation sheets are attached, results are summarized in Table 1R. 12. SR 18/SR 161 LOS Analysis We have re-calculated the LOS, using the City's timing inputs and the modified traffic volumes due to the additional 18 hotel units. The calculation sheets are attached. Results of our analysis are summarized in Table 1 R. Using the City's minimum green time of 15 seconds for protected left turn phases results in the intersection operating at a LOS F. Improvements to the LOS can be achieved via better allocation of green time. For example providing 15 seconds of green time for the eastbound to northbound left turn movement comprising 45 vehicles during the PM peak results in wasted green time. A seven second minimum green time is identified on page 850-5 in the WSDOT Design Manual. In fact we are aware of several WSDOT intersection signals that have five second minimum green time. Allocating green time based on vehicle demand would result in the intersection operating at a LOS E. Therefore, we would recommend that the City modify the signal timing at the SR 161/SR 18 accordingly. 13. Pedestrian Access On-site pedestrian paths comprise of concrete walkways. Stamped concrete cross-walks across the internal streetways are also provided. The concrete path, southwest portion of the site, connects with the existing concrete path east of the Taco Bell restaurant. This path provides access to the Taco Bell restaurant. A short section, between the restaurant and S. 348th St. sidewalk, about 50-ft., is not marked. This section crosses an internal circulation street. The S. 348th St. sidewalk provides pedestrian access to the McDonalds restaurant to the east. Pedestrian draws to SR 99 are limited. A bus stop exists in the northeast corner of the SR 99/S. 348th St. intersection. This bus stop can also be accessed via S. 348`h St. - SR 99 sidewalks. Pedestrian access to SR 99 would be shared with vehicles using the ingress/egress easement street. G' Pi oj' Is F PRO lEO TS F0816,M F084€ARecponselb do- Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY September 9, 1999 ') Page 5 Summary and Conclusions This letter responds to your comments to Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner. No material changes to our Country Inn & Suites - Federal Way Traffic Impact Analysis result. However, the City's identification of a minimum 15 second green time for protected left turn phasing should be reviewed. Review of the Design Manual and actual WSDOT practice indicates that minimum green times can be five seconds. Allocating green time based on traffic demands results in all the analyzed intersections operates at LOS E and better If you have any questions please call me at (425) 455-5320 or email me at mjacobs@tranplaneng.com. Very Truly Yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. Mark J. Jacobs, P.E. Associate MJJ:sv cc: James Mulloy, Federal Way Investments, L.L.C. George Watson, Lindquist Architects Pojecfs F PROJECTS F084596 FC&76AResponsefftr do, TABLE 1 R COUNTRY INN & SUITES - FEDERAL WAY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I� PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY 2003 2003 2003 (I INTERSECTION EXISTING W/O PROJECT W/ PROJECT W/PROJECT CITY TIMING S. 324th St./SR 99 Overall D (33.4) E (43.6) E (44.0) E (45.1) �� Eastbound F (*) F (*) F (*) F (*)1 --- -- S 330 St./SR 99 Westbound F (") F (*) F (*) F (*)1 II Overall D (23.1) F (59.4) F (59.2) D (29.3)1 A (4.9)2 A (4.9)` S. 336`h St./SR 99 Overall E (51.0)3 F (74.9)3 F (75.7) E (47.9)3'4 E (46.7)5 E (50.4)5 I I S. 16th Ave ./SR 99 Overall B (12.0) B (12.7) B (12.8) C (15.4) II S. 348th St./SR 99 Overall D (27.3) D (31.2) D (31.3) D (35.3) SR 18/SR 161 Overall D (34.0) F (61.5)6 E (54.4) F (64.2)�$ II SR 99/Driveway WB -- -- B (8.6) 9 N/A IB (11.0) S. 348w St./Driveway SBRT -- -- A 10 N/A U • Number shown is the average stopped delay in seconds per vehicle for the intersection as a whole, which determines the LOS for intersections per the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, 3rd Edition updated 1994. * Average delay exceeds 120 seconds. 1 Add EB and WB right turn pockets. 2 With traffic control signal. 3 SIGNAL94 Evaluate Function Used. 4 City six year project to add EB and WB approach lanes. 5 City 20 year project to add EB and NB left turn lanes. 6 City timing. LOS with revised traffic volume projection. 8 LOS with improved allocation of green time. 9 Highway Capacity Software release 3.1 used. Release 3.1 is based on the December 1997 update to the Highway Capacity Manual. t0 LOS via Traffic Engineering inspection, right turn in/out only. C''-P,olects'.F PROJECTS.F084698 F0846AResponselb doc 1 A it kt not to scale � ' , f 3R r +S 320th St. 13% 21 3% 5lir - 2R w �s�� a a ,5 r3/S 324th St. `m -o- 't6 1 t 1 8% N ,i` --nn S 330th St. 0 k 0 n N 2X l r 1 3R ) c-ie 1.-' 1 f f P S. 4. a 3,1O �� N..-) ?.2 in o N ^o ir Q .c Project fO Site N o S 348th St. 3 _p t,.. 11 I 10R 2--► w Nor 3 r N N / D y OC q N Z c b0 e? w u 0 Q &, Sa h PROJECT TRAFFIC it a Average Daily traffic [580] [666] ) •--I-1-12 PM Peak Hour Enter '23- 24 Exit '2-3, 27 2 r PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES St DISTRIBUTION FIGURfi— E� COUNTRY [- INN & SUITES HOTEL — FEDERAL WAY 6M TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS t\ I A 11/1-t.iol 1.-.-- N......77 L --2155 Rr425 N 161---. III not to scale 340� t000 N�--in S 320th St. N 0 (41 d , 4S 324th St. i Ai N s 330th St. �ZN_110 Iry -II* 43 )1 k -,"'S83 St. 1\ r2/3 523� R vt-5-`r 0-' 1t1 339- I� t S COON N O 14-1k rnor7 N (D el ii <4 -215) 0 1.343 / u (o h O Project Site S 348th St. NIt YNN (::3 .' u (DN Ni�91 13 (o'< < )1� •- � _ 1359249 `n tq (� 124 u N � 1106-► III .?. `w ` `329 168 ors-- u J 1I +—'tb 1824 ��(v a r'858 42 1154-+ Itl 392� Ponca Povto LEGEND X--' PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction (XX) Taco Bell restaurant, estimated 1 PROJECTED 2003 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/ PROJECT FIGURE-.. (111 _ COUNTRY INN & SUITES HOTEL — FEDERAL WAY 7M TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 1 �- II is IIt11 I:, t-k► c-iI t 1.1—.< t. S-►(_)y 922 1775 P _ 07 • interoffice MEMORANDUM Federal Way Dept. of Public Works Traffic. Services Division To: Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner From: Smarty l.,oug, Traffic Analyst 'Ix-- Subject. l-lawthoru Suites; UP399-0002 and SEP99-0003 Transportation Impact Analysis (I-lA) Date: March 1, 1999 This memorandum provides review comments from the Traffic Division on the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA)and the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)check list for the proposed Country Inn& Suites Hotel Iocated on the southeast corner of S 348'Sheet and SR-99. The application is complete However, the TIA needs to be revised to iucon porate the following comments. P L (jrtrnsportation Impact Analysis (TIA) �� ifitcu" 1 Trip Generation and Distribution. The total trip rates as shown is incorrect. The tip rates should account for 13-additional rooms that are proposed in phase 11. 2. Please clarify whether one access or two accesses would be provided otrto the existing street network_ Tbc SEPA checklist indit atr_s one access onto S. 348'Street, however, the site plan and the TIA indicates two accesses_ • 3. The horizon year used in the LOS analysis is incorrect LOS analysis and mitigation fees for all impacted intersection should be recalculated using traffic volumes from the expected date of full development of the site. If revision to existing traffic signals is needed as result of the proposed project,a five(5)years horizon year front the phase completion should be analyzed. 4. The accident iatc for S. 34Rt St./SR 99 and SR 18/SR 161 intersection should he recalculated using the three year accident data provided- Intersection with an accident rate of 1.50 crashes per million entering vehicles or greater is considered high accident location, further analysis and passible tningation Should be investigated- What types of accidents were occulting at an intersection?Are safety improvements warranted as!eartlt of the proposed project? S_ SR 991 Sire access. Please provide 1_05 analysis for city review 6. S 324t/SR 99 LOS analysis. The intersection is currently operating at LOS E not LOS D as indicated in Table 1 of the TIA, Minimum phase lengths should provide for adequate pedestrian crossing time at 4 seconds for walk and 4 feet per second for clearance,and 15 seconds fur protected left-turn phases. At a minimum,5 seconds should be used for the(Y+R)_ 1 • •,� a .4)4 , _ I •)/\ I „icic �i� , t E>r ( ti i t arc I -. !it c) c)3-';" t % /i) P •rJ v... • 7. S. 330'h St./SR 99. Actual peak hour factor(PI-fF)or default value of 0.90 should he used in the LOS analysis not 0.95. 8. S. 336e St/SR 99_ Please provide capacity au tlysis sununaty sheet fin city review. Minimum phase lenpt6,,hc,utd provide for adequate pedestrian crossing time at 4 seconds for walk and 4 fide( per second for clearance, and 15 srA:on s for protected left-tuns phases. At a minimum,5 seconds should be used for tlx:(Y-tR). 9. Pipeline Projects. I rattle generated by pipeline projects should he included in the Tin and should be in the appendices. -` 10. Count data used for-analysis should be in the appendices 11. S. 3484' St and SR 99 (Page 52 Signal 94 Report,Appendix) LOS Analysis. Cycle!eolith is 140 seconds.not 136 seconds Adequate pedestrian crossing time should be provided at 4 seconds for walk and 4 feet per second for clearance, and 15 seconds for protected left-turn phases. At a minimum, 5 seconds should be used for the(Y+R). Existing lane configurations and phase sequences should be used- 12. SR 18/SR 161 (Enclunte('Parkway)LOS analysis This iutcrux:tion is currently operating at 140 seconds,nut 128 seconds. Adequate pedestrian crossing time should be provided at 4 seconds for walk and 4 feet per second for clearance, and 15 seconds fur protected left-turn phases. At a minimum, 5 seconds should be used for the(Y+R). 13. The TIA needs to address pedestrian access to S. 3481"Street and SR 99. State Environrnentxl Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist , 14. TRANSPORTATION NSPORTATION 14. Section 14(f) in the SEPA checklist_ Please revise the total trips sate to reflect 18 additional rooms that are proposed in Phase ll_ Lvausrnrxx iikirimcrr.00.onrr0301 00.rxr 2 Snap-01-99 01 : 41P P. 02 1010tAm r KUP1 JKA ''2Ub a.3.y ' ' ' • - Jinneman, Kennedy, & Associates, P.S. Hospitality Investment Advisors 6720 Fort Dent Way, Suite 120 Seattle, Washington 98188 Voice: (206)439-6733 FAX: (206)439-7059 www.jk-a.com Fax To: Mr.Sam Saleh From: Mr.Tom Kennedy Fax: (253)520-2588 Pages: 4 Phone: Date: September 1, 1999 Rs: Federal Way Lodging Market Code: O Urgent OFor Review a Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle • Comments: Our last study in Federal Way was completed in mid-1997 so betel performiance shows 1996 as the most current year. Wish we could be more help. Give me a call if you have any questions. Bert regards, Tom CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information contained in this fec simiie message is legally privileged and aonttdentlal informatcin intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or Copy of this facsimile is strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notify us by telephone end return the original message to us at the address set forth above. • Sep—01 -99 01 : 41P P . 03 ti—b 1-1`jy 1 H:e.2Ani r KUi-i J►:A 04.1ty n..1 icy N. Table 1.5 ,,,r,.p.w�— Census Of Copt etitive Hotel Market YOU' AiYaIhb1�q fiitt .atp•R#t AAA RO¢gts:' C +f . u le' ,co-riolni :_.soittas, Best Western Execute' Inn 1983 112 S99-S 149 S 1054149 $99-S 109 ♦r `Holiday Inn Express 1994 54 $49-$91 $5 5-S 1 10 S76 r r r Super 8 Motel 1988 9� $52 $61 S52 Not Rated Total Available Rooms 256 tiowtccs: 1997 AAA Taboo ,l Mc/Mans txatt,nod Jitneman,Kennedy,Itc Associates,P.S. v` .- 4 Scap-01-99 O1 : 41P P . O4 9-01—1 999 10:Ii2AM F kL 1 JKA i>d 4,i& iv_r.,i r. oL v d a if,' 4 N 8p o0 S —, N o a a o. I 1 ,„... 1 i E .... Y „,... pe ,e, PIK Q O i j :11j gg 11 g g I ri I aN ., 1 111 ii jeli x (4 e Al tci ° 'd a — p i It, AI 1 ? 5'2, rn ,,,, a 4 .:c. a 1 2 F vt4 11 , gr R M a 2 T i c m A 1, . i A ID .11 _ , 141 ! 11 ii. 471 �U p-,. 5 , COUNTRY INN AND SUITES HOTEL 08/30/99 S. 324TH STREET/SR 99 10 : 50: 24 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI32499W) i SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages : Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0 . 89 Vehicle Delay 45 . 1 Level of Service E+ Sq 67 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 + * * I + * * **** I / \ +> <* * <**** v ++++ v I **** North I <* <+ + +> + +> +> I ****> I I ++++ * ++++ + + + + + + I ++++ v * v + + + + + + I v G/C=0 . 130 I G/C=0 . 000 I G/C=0. 359 I G/C=0 . 231 I G/C=0 .138 G= 18.2" I G. 0 . 0" I G. 50 . 2" I G= 32 .3" I G. 19 . 3" Y+R= 5 . 0" I Y+R= 0 . 0" I Y+R= 5 . 0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5 . 0" OFF= 0. 0% I OFF=16 . 6% I OFF=16 . 6% I OFF=56 .0% I OFF=82 . 6% C=140 sec G=120 . 0 sec = 85 .7% Y=20 . 0 sec = 14 . 3% Ped= 0. 0 sec = 0 . 0% I Lane Width/ g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 90% Maxi I Group Lanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume) v/c I Delay I S Queue I N Approach 46 .3 E+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.446 10 .373 I 932 11351 11351 I1. 000 I 47 . 2 I *E+ I 834 ft ' I LT 112/1 10. 285 10 . 144 I 1 l 230 I 129 I0 . 506 1 37 . 1 I D 1217 ftl S Approach 34 . 0 D I RT 12/1 10 .396 10 .639 I 891 I 961 I 410 10 .427 I 8 . 3 I B+ I 291 ftl TH 24/2 I0.420 10 .373 I 960 11389 l 1247 10 . 898 I 32 . 6 I D 1769 ftl LT 1 12/1 10 .318 10 . 144 I 1 I 230 I 255 I1. 000 l 82 . 0 I *F 1429 ftl E Approach 61. 6 F I TH+RTI 12/1- 10.375 10 .245 1 1 I 420 I 433 I1. 000 I 67 . 4 I *F 1643 ftl I LT 112/1+ I0 .367 10 .245 I 1 I 421 I 411 10 . 947 I 55 . 5 I E 1 610 ftl W Approach 53 . 0 E I RT 112/1 10 . 382 10.318 I 223 I 494 I 395 10 .795 I 34 .2 I D 1 530 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.322 10 . 152 I 1 I 254 I 279 I1. 000 I 79 . 8 I *F 1465 ftl 6 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES HOTEL 08/30/99 S. 324TH STREET/SR 99 10:50:45 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI32499W) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 . 0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 10 0 10 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 57 1127 119 77 215 425 381 1105 237 340 161 79 WIDTHS 0 . 0 24 . 0 12 . 0 0 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 .0 24 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 0 . 0 LANES 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 UTILIZATIONS 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0. 00 0 .00 0 .00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0. 00 0 . 00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2 .0 2 .0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0. 92 0 . 92 0 . 92 0. 85 0 . 85 0 . 85 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 86 0. 86 0 . 86 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 5.0 5. 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 .0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5. 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 MINIMUMS 15 . 0 15. 0 15. 0 15 . 0 15. 0 15. 0 15 . 0 15. 0 15 . 0 15. 0 15.0 15. 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM DOPT NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3623 1770 0 1766 1770 1503 3725 1770 1566 1833 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 67 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET 0 . 00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0. 0 0 GREENTIMES 18.17 0 . 00 50 .20 32 .32 19 . 31 YELLOWTIMES 5 .00 0 . 00 5.00 5.00 5. 00 CRITICALS 9 0 2 5 11 EXCESS 0 7 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/31/99 S. 330TH ST./SR 99 12 :36 :53 2003 W/ PROJECT AND CITY TIP (CI33099T) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC [Ver 1. 21] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0. 65 Vehicle Delay 4 . 9 Level of Service A Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 * * + ^ * * + I **** / \ <* * +> v **** ^ ++++ v North <+ + +> I I I + + + i ++++ + + + I v G/C=0.787 G/C=0. 142 G= 110.2" I G= 19 . 8" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5 . 0" OFF= 0 . 0% OFF=82 . 3% C=140 sec G=130 .0 sec = 92 . 9% Y=10 . 0 sec = 7 .1% Ped= 0 .0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 4 .4 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10 .577 I0. 801 12924 12924 11993 10 . 682 I 4 .4 I *A 1390 ftl I LT 112/1 10 .556 I0. 801 I 84 I 102 I 48 10.449 I 4 . 8 I A I 25 ftI S Approach 4 . 1 A I TH+RTI 24/2 0 . 558 0. 801 12922 12922 11905 10. 652 I 4 . 1 I A 1373 ftl I LT 112/1 0 .298 0. 801 I 81 I 98 I 14 10 .136 I 2 . 0 I A I 25 ftl E Approach 34 .2 D ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10 .276 10.156 I 1 I 206 I 74 10.322 I 34 .2 I *D 1123 ftl W Approach 32 .7 D ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10 . 261 10. 156 I 1 I 200 I 19 I0 . 085 I 32 .7 I D I 32 ft1 8 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/31/99 S. 330TH ST./SR 99 12 :37 :08 2003 W/ PROJECT AND CITY TIP (CI33099T) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1. 21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 . 0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 10 0 10 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 6 1702 43 43 0 23 13 1620 13 14 0 3 WIDTHS 0 . 0 24 . 0 12 . 0 0 . 0 12 . 0 0. 0 0.0 24 . 0 12 . 0 0 . 0 12 . 0 0 . 0 LANES 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 UTILIZATIONS 0. 00 0 . 00 0. 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 .00 0. 00 0 . 00 0 .00 0. 00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2 . 0 2 . 0 2. 0 2 . 0 2 .0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0 . 90 0 . 90 0. 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0. 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0. 90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 5 . 0 5 . 0 5. 0 5 . 0 5. 0 5. 0 5 . 0 5. 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5. 0 MINIMUMS 5. 0 5.0 5. 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5. 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5. 0 5.0 5.0 5 .0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3649 134 0 1476 0 0 3646 129 0 1438 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET 0 . 00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0 . 0 0 GREENTIMES 110. 18 19. 82 YELLOWTIMES 5. 00 5. 00 CRITICALS 2 5 EXCESS 0 9 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES HOTEL 08/31/99 S. 336TH STREET/SR 99 12 :44 :30 2003 W/ PROJECT AND CITY 20 (CI336C20) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC [Ver 1.21] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0 . 89 Vehicle Delay 50 .4 Level of Service E Sq 46 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I / \ *> <+ * <+ <+ <**** v ^ **** ^ i ^ North I <+ I + +> I I ++++> I ++++> I I ++++ + I + + I I ++++ I ++++ v + + + I I v I V G/C=0 . 107 I G/C=0 . 314 I G/C=0 . 107 I G/C=0 . 157 I G/C=0 . 136 G= 15. 0" I G= 44 . 0" I G. 15. 0" G= 22 . 0" I G= 19 . 0" Y+R= 5. 0" I Y+R= 5 . 0" I Y+R= 5 . 0" Y+R= 5 . 0" I Y+R= 5 .0" OFF= 0 . 0% I OFF=14 . 3% I OFF=49 . 3% I OFF=63 . 6% I OFF=82 . 9% C=140 sec G=115. 0 sec = 82 . 1% Y=25 . 0 sec = 17 . 9% Ped= 0 . 0 sec = 0 . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay I S Queue N Approach 47 . 9 E+ I RT 112/1 10.365 10. 664 I 937 I 998 I 338 10. 339 I 6 .7 I B+I 223 ft ! I TH 24/2 10 .423 10 . 329 I 645 11224 11266 11. 034 I 59.2 I *E 1 836 ft1 I LT 12/1 10 .292 10 . 121 I 1 I 188 I 157 10.730 I 46 . 3 I *E+ I 271 ftl S Approach 47 . 6 E+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.415 10 .329 1 624 11186 11180 10 . 995 I 49 . 3 I E+I 780 ft1 I LT 124/2 10 . 287 10 . 121 I 1 I 404 I 284 10. 660 I 40.5 I E+ I 245 ftl E Approach 75 .4 F I TH+RTI 24/2 10.321 10 . 150 I 1 I 516 I 558 11. 041 I 80 . 1 I *F 1467 ftl I LT 112/1 10.271 10 . 121 I 1 I 188 I 67 10 .312 I 36. 6 I *D 1 116 ftl W Approach 45. 9 E+ I RT 12/1 0 . 374 10 .486 I 620 I 754 I 373 10.495 16 .2 I C+ I 377 ftl I TH 12/1 0.419 10.343 I 358 I 639 I 584 10 . 914 41.2 I E+ I 755 ft1 I LT 12/1 10.428 10 .314 I 243 I 556 I 575 11. 034 69 . 9 I *F 1 776 ftl 10 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES HOTEL 08/31/99 S. 336TH STREET/SR 99 12:44 :40 2003 W/ PROJECT AND CITY 20 (CI336C20) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 .0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 10 2 10 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 321 1146 149 110 352 58 75 1004 265 339 531 523 WIDTHS 12 . 0 24 . 0 12 . 0 0 . 0 24 . 0 12 . 0 0 . 0 24 . 0 24 . 0 12 .0 12 .0 12 . 0 LANES 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 UTILIZATIONS 0 . 00 0 . 00 0.00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0. 00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 .0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0 . 95 0 . 95 0 . 95 0. 87 0. 87 0. 87 0 . 96 0 . 96 0 . 96 0. 91 0 . 91 0. 91 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 5.0 5. 0 5 . 0 5. 0 5.0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 .0 5'. 0 5. 0 5 .0 5. 0 MINIMUMS 15. 0 15 .0 15 . 0 15.0 15. 0 15. 0 15. 0 15.0 15 . 0 15.0 15.0 15. 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1503 3725 1770 0 3570 1770 0 3611 3539 1553 1863 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 46 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET 0 . 00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0 .0 0 GREENTIMES 15. 00 44 . 00 15. 00 22 .00 19 . 00 YELLOWTIMES 5. 00 5.00 5. 00 5 . 00 5 . 00 CRITICALS 3 2 6 12 5 EXCESS 0 11 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/31/99 16TH AVE S./SR 99 13 : 05:24 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI16S99W) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC [Ver 1.21] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0 . 53 Vehicle Delay 15 .4 Level of Service C+ Sq 21 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 **/** + * * + / I \ + *> + v v **** v North * *> I I * * * * G/C=0 .480 I G/C=0. 256 I G/C=0 . 156 G= 67 . 3" G= 35 . 9" G= 21. 8" Y+R= 5 . 0" I Y+R= 5. 0" I Y+R= 5. 0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=51. 6% I OFF=80 . 8% C=140 sec G=125. 0 sec = 89. 3% Y=15 . 0 sec = 10 . 7% Ped= 0 . 0 sec = 0 . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L I90% Maxi Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S I Queue I N Approach 11. 5 B TH 124/2 10 .366 10.787 12873 12873 I 897 10. 312 I 2 .7 I A 1188 ftl LT 124/2 10.422 10 .495 11558 11751 1 1190 I0 . 680 I 18.2 I *C+ I 592 ft1 S Approach 29. 2 D+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10 . 321 10. 271 I 139 I 988 I 573 I0 . 580 I 29 . 2 I *D+ I 411 ftl E Approach 31.2 D+ I LT 124/2 10 . 258 I0. 170 I 1 I 516 I 9 I0. 017 I 31.2 1 *D+ I 25 ftl 12 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/31/99 16TH AVE S./SR 99 13 : 05 :47 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI16S99W) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC [Ver 1. 21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 . 0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 10 0 10 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 803 1086 0 0 9 2 495 0 0 0 0 WIDTHS 0 . 0 24 .0 24 .0 0 . 0 0 . 0 24 . 0 0 .0 24 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 LANES 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 UTILIZATIONS 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0.00 0 . 00 0. 00 0 . 00 0.00 0. 00 0 . 00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 .0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 .0 2 . 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0. 94 0 . 94 0 . 94 0 . 96 0 . 96 0 . 96 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0.90 0. 90 0 . 90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 5. 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5. 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 .0 5. 0 5 . 0 MINIMUMS 15. 0 15 . 0 15 .0 15. 0 15. 0 15 . 0 15. 0 15 . 0 15 . 0 15.0 15 .0 15 . 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3651 3539 0 0 3131 0 3649 0 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 21 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET 0. 00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0 .0 0 GREENTIMES 67 .26 35. 91 21.84 YELLOWTIMES 5. 00 5 . 00 5 . 00 CRITICALS 3 8 6 EXCESS 0 13 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/30/99 S. 348TH STREET/SR 99 11: 02 :23 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI34899W) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0 . 83 Vehicle Delay 35 .3 Level of Service D Sq 0 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 + ^ + + + ^ + ++++ I + + + ++++ ++++ / \ +> <+ + <+ <++++ <++++ ^v ++++ ^ ++++ v North <* + +> ++++> ++++> II * + + ++++ ++++ * I + + v v G/C=0 . 107 I G/C=0 . 179 I G/C=0 . 107 I G/C=0 . 279 I G/C=0 . 150 G. 15 . 0" I G= 25 . 0" I G= 15.0" G. 39 . 0" I G= 21. 0" Y+R= 5 . 0" I Y+R= 5 . 0" I Y+R= 5. 0" I Y+R= 5 . 0" I Y+R= 5 . 0" OFF= 0 . 0% I OFF=14 .3% I OFF=35.7% OFF=50 . 0% I OFF=81.4% C=140 sec G=115 . 0 sec = 82 . 1% Y=25 . 0 sec = 17 . 9% Ped= 0 . 0 sec = 0. 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj I HCM L 90% Maxi Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c I Delay S Queue I N Approach 52 . 2 E I RT 112/1 I0.290 10 . 336 i 269 i 512 I 128 I0.250 I 21. 8 i C 1167 ftl I TH 124/2 10. 337 10. 193 I 1 I 711 1 710 10 . 989 i 59.7 I *E 1564 ftl I LT 112/1 10 .286 10 . 121 1 1 I 188 I 134 10. 623 I 41. 6 I *E+ I 232 ftl S Approach 40.4 E+ I RT 112/1 10 . 328 10.193 I 1 I 279 i 251 10. 837 I 47 .7 I E+ I 399 fti I TH 124/2 0.301 10 . 193 I 1 1 711 I 421 10. 586 i 34 . 1 I D 1334 ftl I LT 112/1 0 . 291 10. 121 I 1 I 188 I 155 10.721 I 45 . 8 I *E+ I 268 ftl E Approach 27 . 8 D+ RT 112/1 10. 279 10. 621 I 889 I 965 I 91 I0. 094 I 6 . 9 I B+ I 68 ftl TH 24/2 0 .487 0 .479 1564 11783 1604 0. 900 26 .4 D+ 823 ft I LT 24/2 0. 302 0 .164 1 I 565 406 0. 699 38 . 2 *D 334 ft W Approach 32 . 0 D+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10 .467 10 .436 11279 11557 11438 10. 924 I 31. 1 I D+ I 798 ftl i LT 112/1 10 . 286 10.121 I 1 I 188 I 133 10. 619 I 41. 5 I E+ I 230 ftl 14 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/30/99 S. 348TH STREET/SR 99 11: 02 :39 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI34899W) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC [Ver 1.21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 . 0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0 . 0 0. 0 0 .0 0. 0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 6 2 2 10 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 118 622 123 91 1528 394 211 337 130 168 1106 124 WIDTHS 12 . 0 24 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 24 .0 24 . 0 12 . 0 24 . 0 12 . 0 0 .0 24 .0 12 . 0 LANES 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS 0. 00 0. 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00 0. 00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2 .0 2 . 0 2 .0 2 .0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 .0 2 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0. 92 0. 92 0. 92 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 .84 0 . 93 0. 93 0 . 93 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 5 . 0 5. 0 5. 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 . 0 5.0 5 . 0 5. 0 5.0 5.0 5. 0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5. 0 5 . 0 5.0 5.0 5. 0 5 . 0 5 .0 5 . 0 5.0 5. 0 5 . 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1528 3725 1770 1553 3725 3539 1553 3725 1770 0 3574 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET 0. 00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0 . 0 0 GREENTIMES 15. 00 25. 00 15 . 00 39 . 00 21. 00 YELLOWTIMES 5. 00 5 . 00 5. 00 5. 00 5 . 00 CRITICALS 9 3 2 6 0 EXCESS 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 1 3 9 4 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 2 1 2 7 8 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 3 10 11 12 1 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 4 4 5 10 11 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 5 4 5 6 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/31/99 S. 348TH STREET/SR 99 11:37 :28 2003 W/O PROJECT (CI18161F) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC [Ver 1. 21] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 0 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 + + + ++++ I + + ++++ I ++++ / \ I <+ + +> I <+ + <++++ I <++++ v I v I ^ I **** I ^ ^ v I ++++ North + +> <+ + +> +> ++++> ++++> I + + ++++ + + + + ++++ ++++ + + I v + + + + I v v G/C=0 .136 I G/C=0. 007 I G/C=0 . 107 G/C=0 .257 I G/C=0 . 171 i G/C=0.107 G= 19. 0" I G= 1.0" I G= 15. 0" G= 36 . 0" I G= 24 . 0" I G= 15. 0" Y+R= 5. 0" I Y+R= 5. 0" I Y+R= 5. 0" I Y+R= 5 . 0" I Y+R= 5 . 0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0. 0% I OFF=17 . 1% I OFF=21.4% I OFF=35 .7% I OFF=65 .0% I OFF=85.7% C=140 sec G=110 . 0 sec = 78 . 6% Y=30 . 0 sec = 21.4% Ped= 0 . 0 sec = 0 . 0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 27 821 571 362 2092 971 633 523 369 422 1302 45 8138 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 36 32 37 59 38 49 31 30 40 43 27 g/C Used: % 0 19 15 79 48 27 46 16 12 69 33 12 SV @E: vph 0 699 511 1231 1783 961 710 597 404 1031 1224 188 9339 Svc Lvl:LOS F F A F E D+ E+ E+ B+ F D F Deg Sat:v/c 0. 00 1.20 1.08 0.29 1. 17 1. 01 0.89 0. 86 0. 86 0.41 1. 06 0.21 0. 99 Avg Del:s/v 0 .0127 . 2100. 5 4 . 5 99 . 9 72 .4 49.1 66 .3 75 . 3 10 .7 79 . 2 56 .6 79 . 9 Tot Del:min 0 450 239 7 871 293 129 145 116 19 430 11 2710 # Stops:veh 0 212 142 24 523 242 145 127 90 46 325 10 1886 Max Que:veh 0 80 45 6 150 57 27 34 25 10 83 3 520 Max Que: ft 0 1010 571 148 1892 721 676 430 319 261 1055 78 1892 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 1419 3425 1525 1769 8138 Svc Lvl:LOS F F E+ E F Deg Sat:v/c 1. 15 1. 03 0 . 87 0 . 89 0. 99 Avg Del :s/v 116 .5 82 . 0 61. 3 62 . 3 79 . 9 Tot Del:min 689 1171 390 460 2710 # Stops:veh 354 789 362 381 1886 Max Que:veh 125 213 86 96 520 Max Que: ft 1010 1892 676 1055 1892 16 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/31/99 S. 348TH STREET/SR 99 11:37 :35 2003 W/O PROJECT (CI18161F) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 .0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 6 2 2 10 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 24 712 504 329 1813 858 582 458 329 392 1153 42 WIDTHS 0.0 24.0 24.0 12.0 24.0 24 .0 12.0 24 .0 24.0 12.0 24.0 12.0 LANES 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2 .0 2. 0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0.91 0. 91 0.91 0. 91 0.91 0. 91 0.92 0. 92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.93 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3662 3539 1553 3725 3539 1553 3725 3539 1503 3725 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 19.00 1. 00 15.00 36.00 24.00 15 . 00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5. 00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5 .00 CRITICALS 9 3 2 6 0 5 EXCESS 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 1 1 2 3 4 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 2 1 2 7 8 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 3 7 8 9 10 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 4 4 5 6 7 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 5 4 5 10 11 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 6 10 11 12 0 0 0 17 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/31/99 SR 18/SR 161 11:18:12 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI18161W) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21) - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 0 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4 I Phase 5 Phase 6 * * + A + + + . * * + ++++ + + ++++ ++++ + / \ <* * +> <+ + <++++ <++++ <+ v v ++++ A A A v ++++ North * +> <+ + +> +> ++++> ****> * + + + + + ++++ ++++ * + + + + + v v G/C=0.136 G/C=0.007 G/C=0.107 G/C=0.257 G/C=0.171 G/C=0.107 G= 19.0" G= 1.0" G= 15.0" G= 36.0" G= 24 .0" G= 15.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=17 .1% OFF=21.4% OFF=35.7% OFF=65.0% OFF=85.7% C=140 sec G=110.0 sec = 78.6% Y=30.0 sec = 21.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 27 823 584 362 2104 971 633 523 370 422 1303 45 8167 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 24/2 12/1 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 36 32 37 59 38 50 31 30 40 43 27 g/C Used: % 0 19 15 79 48 27 46 16 12 33 33 12 SV @E: vph 0 701 511 1202 1783 961 701 597 404 504 1224 188 8776 Svc Lvl:LOS F FAFED E+ E D F D F Deg Sat:v/c 0.00 1.20 1.10 0.30 1.18 1.01 0. 90 0.86 0.86 0.83 1.07 0.21 1.02 Avg Del:s/v 0.0127 .0106.3 4.6101. 9 72.4 52.1 66.3 75. 8 54 .1 79.4 56.6 83 .4 Tot Del:min 0 450 259 7 893 293 137 145 117 95 431 11 2838 # Stops:veh 0 212 146 25 526 242 146 127 91 98 325 10 1948 Max Que:veh 0 80 48 6 153 57 27 34 25 22 84 3 539 Max Que: ft 0 1011 612 148 1930 721 676 430 320 558 1058 78 1930 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 1434 3437 1526 1770 8167 Svc Lv1:LOS F F E+ F F Deg Sat:v/c . 1.16 1.04 0.88 0. 99 1.02 Avg Del:s/v 118. 6 83 .3 62.7 72.8 .;(.3 83 .4 Tot Del:min 709 1193 399 537 Z2838 # Stops:veh 358 793 364 433 6' 1 1948 Max Que:veh 128 216 86 109 539 Max Que: ft 1011 1930 676 1058 1930 18 1 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/31/99 SR 18/SR 161 11:02:25 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI18161W) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.96 Vehicle Delay 57 .4 Level of Service E Sq 0 I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 * * + ^ + + A A * * + ++++ + + ++++ ++++ / \ <* * +> <+ + <++++ <++++ v v ++++ A ^ ^ v ++++ North * +> <+ + +> +> ++++> ****> 1 * + ++++ + + + + ++++ ++++ * + v + + + + v v G/C=0.157 G/C=0.007 G/C=0.093 G/C=0.250 G/C=0.229 G/C=0.050 G= 22.0" G= 1.0" G= 13 .0" G= 35. 0" G= 32. 0" G= 7 .0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5. 0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=19.3% OFF=23 .6% OFF=36.4% OFF=65.0% OFF=91.4% C=140 sec G=110.0 sec = 78.6% Y=30.0 sec = 21.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane (Width/ l g/C l Service Rate Adj HCM L Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S 190% Queue I N Approach 74 .5 F I LT+RTI 24/2 4/2 10.325 0.359 10.171 0.214 l 1 1 l 593 786 I 584 850 10.962 1.081 l 57 .3 86.2 i *F E l 476 ft657 l S Approach 52 .8 E RT 12/1 0.496 0.436 508 669 633 0.946 40.9 E+ 703 ft TH 24/2 0.313 0.150 1 540 523 0.936 54 .9 *E 437 ft LT 24/2 0.298 0.107 1 351 370 0. 976 70.0 F 325 ft E Approach 54 .3 E RT 12/1 0.374 0.807 1206 1223 362 0.296 2.3 A 137 ft TH 24/2 0.592 0.529 1810 1969 2104 1.069 57 .7 E 976 ft LT 24/2 0.383 0.264 74 935 971 1.039 66.3 *F 703 ft W Approach 53 .6 E RT 12/1 0.396 0.693 1015 1067 422 0.396 6.0 B+ 255 ft TH 24/2 0.430 0.329 645 1224 1303 1.065 69.4 *F 861 ft LT 12/1 0.266 0.064 1 89 45 0.395 41.8 *E+ 83 ft 19 COUNTRY INN AND SUITES 08/31/99 SR 18/SR 161 13:20:59 2003 W/ PROJECT (CI18161W) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.21] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3 .0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 20 20 20 20 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 5 8 5 4 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 24 713 513 329 1823 858 582 458 330 392 1154 42 WIDTHS 0.0 24 .0 24 .0 12.0 24 .0 24.0 12. 0 24 .0 24 .0 12.0 24.0 12.0 LANES 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2 .0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2. 0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0. 91 0.91 0. 92 0. 92 0. 92 0.93 0. 93 0.93 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 MINIMUMS 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3669 3539 1515 3725 3539 1534 3725 3539 1541 3725 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 140 140 30 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 20.00 3 .00 12.00 36.00 37.00 8.00 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 4.00 4 .00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 CRITICALS 2 8 11 12 6 11 EXCESS 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 1 1 2 3 4 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 2 1 2 7 8 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 3 7 8 9 0 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 4 4 5 6 7 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 5 10 11 4 5 0 0 PHASEMOVEMENTS 6 10 11 12 1 0 0 20 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: mjj Intersection: sr 99/access easement Count Date: 2003 w/ project Time Period: pm peak Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 Volume: 539 13 34 739 6 37 HFR: 539 13 34 739 6 37 PHF: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHV: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: TWLTL # of vehicles: 1 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1, 2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4, 5&6 approach: 1 21 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N Y N N Y N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7, 8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10, 11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound Shared in volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t c,base 4 .1 7.5 6.9 2 22 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3, 1t 0.0 0.7 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0. 00 2 stage 0.00 1.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 6.8 6.9 2 stage 4.1 5.8 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t f,base 2.2 3 .5 3 .3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 3 .5 3 .3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 276 Potential Capacity 727 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 727 Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 552 Potential Capacity 1028 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1028 Probability of Queue free St. 0.97 Worksheet 7a - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance Step 3 : TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1- First Stage Conflicting Flows 546 807 Potential Capacity 522 397 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 3 23 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.97 Movement Capacity 522 384 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2- Second Stage Conflicting Flows 807 552 Potential Capacity 397 518 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 1.00 Movement Capacity 384 518 Part 3- Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1353 1359 Potential Capacity 151 150 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.97 Movement Capacity 146 145 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.91 0.91 Y 1.58 0.71 C t 266 260 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Worksheet 7b - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance Step 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1- First Stage Conflicting Flows 546 807 Potential Capacity 550 404 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.97 Movement Capacity 550 391 Part 2- Second Stage Conflicting Flows 438 270 Potential Capacity 624 757 4. 24 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.95 Movement Capacity 603 719 Part 3- Single Stage Conflicting Flows 983 1077 Potential Capacity 249 217 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 0.97 Maj . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 . Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.93 Movement Capacity 243 201 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.91 0.91 y 0.85 0.39 C t 373 308 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 II I II v(vph) 6 37 Movement Capacity 373 727 Shared Lane Capacity 642 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I II I II v(vph) 34 143 II C m(vph) 1028 642 v/c 0.03 0.07 95% queue length Control Delay 8.6 11.0 5 25 LOS A B Approach Delay 11.0 Approach LOS B 6 26 TRAFFICOUNT bite Code : FEDERAL WAY, WA. PAGE: 1 : PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH FILE: TP1818SP : SOUTH 324TH STREET Movements by: Primary DATE: 6/30/98 Time .... From East .... From South .. .... From West .... .... From North .... Vehicle TRUCK ?gin TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT Total Total 4:00 PM 4 17 34 71 8 65 244 50 1 67 36 17 2 14 303 29 947 15 4:15 4 16 44 88 6 70 208 48 1 52 34 27 3 19 216 27 849 14 ::30 3 18 38 114 6 85 248 47 2 76 39 21 5 11 270 30 997 16 :45 4 19 43 78 3 95 210 44 1 92 39 21 5 22 240 35 938 13 HR TOTAL 15 70 159 351 23 315 910 189 5 287 148 86 15 66 1029 121 3731 58 i:00 PM 3 15 63 111 13 80 262 63 3 78 35 15 4 7 227 23 979 23 :15 4 18 51 76 5 70 241 60 1 61 33 15 4 12 251 20 908 14 5:30 3 16 54 82 7 80 250 38 1 48 32 20 7 11 208 24 863 18 c:45 2 17 44 75 4 59 197 35 5 38 27 13 1 16 228 27 776 12 : TOTAL 12 66 212 344 29 289 950 196 10 225 127 63 16 46 914 94 3526 67 .Y TOTAL 27 136 371 695 52 604 1860 385 15 512 275 149 31 112 1943 215 7257 125 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left Bast 4:15 PM 0.86 14 68 188 391 647 - 11 29 60 South 4:30 PM 0.93 27 330 961 214 1505 - 22 64 14 West 4:15 PM 0.87 7 298 147 84 529 - 56 28 16 North 4:00 PM 0.88 15 66 1029 121 1216 - 5 85 10 Entire Intersection East 4:30 PM 0.85 14 70 195 379 644 - 11 30 59 South 0.93 27 330 961 214 1505 - 22 64 14 West 0.86 7 307 146 72 525 - 58 28 14 North 0.92 18 52 988 108 1148 - 5 86 9 27 TRAFFICOUNT cite Code : FEDERAL WAY, WA. PAGE: 1 : PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH FILE: TP1818SP : SOUTH 324TH STREET Movements by: Primary DATE: 6/30/98 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left East 4:15 PM 0.86 14 68 188 391 647 - 11 29 60 South 4:30 PM 0.93 27 330 961 214 1505 - 22 64 14 West 4:15 PM 0.87 7 298 147 84 529 - 56 28 16 North 4:00 PM 0.88 15 66 1029 121 1216 - 5 85 10 Entire Intersection East 4:30 PM 0.85 14 70 195 379 644 - 11 30 59 South 0.93 27 330 961 214 1505 - 22 64 14 West 0.86 7 307 146 72 525 - 58 28 14 North 0.92 18 52 988 108 1148 - 5 86 9 SOUTH 324TH STREET "y`•••w"` E I ••:tititiM:4M1Lti\4tiLN•:titiil�Y:ti} M•hV.1M1Y:�Yt SWA. [TRUCK] 14 70 195 379 ""�r :: : .::':'y' '" 27 [TRUCK] :: V.... i? < ' L 644 330 m. PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH 1505 961 108 i L 214 988 1148 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH . 52 ] .:::-: 1,..§.../.4...... mm „.....-„, [TRUCK] 18 '':ME4.6 •�•� 72 146 307 7 [TRUCK] 1 YhV.liti; K;M',U SOUTH 324TH STREET 28 TRAFFICOUNT ' to Code : FEDERAL NAT, NA. PAGE: 1 : STATE ROUTE 99 FILE: TGI528IP : S. 330TH STREET • Movements by: Primary DATE: 9/09/91 Prom Vest .... From North . From East . From South .... Vehicle TRUCK t Ton IT THRD LT TRUCK IT THRU LT TRUCE RT TRIM �LT TRUCI IT THRU LT Total Total :30 0 2 0 1 7 0 365 7 0 7 0 5 8 6 344 0 737 -15 •45 0 3 0 0 5 1 381 15 0 16 0 5 7 5 345 2 773 12 ITAL 0 5 0 1 12 1 746 22 0 23 0 10 15 11 689 _ 2 1510 27 :00 PM 0 4 0 0 4 1 359 6 0 6 0 5 4 11 319 5 716 8 .1S 0 4 0 2 10 3 310 11 0 10 0 6 4 18 390 5 829 14 0 7 0 4 8 2 339 12 0 14 0 4 3 12 307 6 707 11 .r 0 5 0 2 4 2 329 12 0 22 0 5 5 7 270 1 65S 9 TOTAL 0 20 0 8 26 8 1407 41 0 52 0 20 16 48 1286 17 2907 42 PM 0 6 0 4 6 0 350 13 0 11 0 4 2 8 315 1 712 0 0 7 0 1 4 0 307 14 0 11 0 4 3 10 297 2 653 7 .ORAL 0 38 0 14 48 9 2810 90 0 97 0 38 36 77 2587 22 5782 84 PEAR PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 1:30 PM - 6:30 PM DIRECTION START PEAK RR VOLUMES ., PERCENTS FROM PHIK HOUR FACTOR TRUCE Right Thru Left Total TRUCE Eight Thru Left Nest 5:30 PM 0.82 0 25 0 11 36 - 69 0 31 North 4:30 PM 0.96 26 5 1485 39 1529 - 0 97 3 Bast 5:15 PM 0.70 0 57 0 19 76 - 75 0 25 South 4:30 PM 0.88 23 40 1398 12 1450 - 3 96 1 Entire Intersection 77Y) Vest 4:30 PM 0.67 v 0 13 0 3 16 - 81 0 19 North 0.96 y 26 5 1485 39 1529 - 0 97 3 East 0.71 0 0 39 0 21 60 - 65 0 35 South 0.88 V 23 40 1398 12 1450 - 3 96 1 u 29 TRAFFICOUNT 02 FEDERAL WAY, WA. PAGE: 1 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOOTS PILE: TG1107PP : SOUTH 336TH STREET 1 Movements by: Prilary DATE: 6/19/97 • PEAT PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR TIE PERIOD: 4:00 PH - 6:00 PM 1 DIRECTION START PEAL ER VOLUMES PERCENTS PROM • PEA( HOUR FACTOR TRUCI Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left 1 Kest 4:30 PH 0.92 11 30S 4S7 422 1114 - 26 39 36 North 4:45 PH 0.95 21 261 993 130 1190 - 19 71 9 • Bast 4:30 PH 0.89 12 101 310 48 459 - 22 68 10 South 4:45 PH 0.96 20 66 871 233 1170 - 6 74 20 1 Entire Intersection West 4:45 PM 0.91 11 295 417 429 1171 - 25 38 31 I North 0.95 24 267 993 130 1390 - 19 71 9 Bast 0.87 8 98 298 51 417 - 22 67 11 South 0.96 20 66 871 233 1170 - 6 71 20 SOUTH 336TH STREET > -K W S'{, J , S —N ' - >)to ti` ;% '.Y i;Ii''2.2}�`�>,'•,� • v '% 14: :. ', [TRUCK] 13 295 447 429 ;""- ; • 24 [TRUCK] >$15 .`.% ' ss �n'f.-treir 1171 267 4 r . , 1 Sy r • PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH 1390 993 Ac • 233 i L 130 m 871 1170 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH 66 i t 447 ' ' M : , >"sM 1 xs lk' A. ' , .:'fix ;> rnza; [TRUCK] 20 ,;,} '�os . sa-r: �¢ ,� j 51 298 98 8 [TRUCK] v s It SOUTH 336TH STREET K1.4n.•. I I • 12/08/97 MON 18:00 (TX/RX NO 6835] 1 30 TRAFFICOUNT „ite Code : FEDERAL WAY, WA. PAGE: 1 : PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH FILE: TP1818XP : SOUTH 348TH STREET Movements by: Primary DATE: 6/30/98 Time .... From South .... .... From West .... From North .... .... From East .... Vehicle TRUCK !gin TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT Total Total 4:00 PM 10 41 47 18 9 23 235 33 8 23 124 23 12 17 351 83 1018 39 4:15 9 56 98 26 7 32 235 21 4 27 134 25 12 19 311 79 1063 32 :30 7 44 56 24 8 35 240 34 7 25 130 22 16 20 336 66 1032 38 :45 6 53 89 37 17 34 251. 25. 8 23 128 31 11 26 338 85 1120 42 ,1R TOTAL 32 194 290 105 41 124 961 113 27 98 516 101 51 82 1336 313 4233 151 :00 PM 9 51 70 21 5 36 240 26 8 23 144 24 11 23 333 96 1087 33 :15 6 39 66 31 6 44 255 32 5 25 152 32 6 9 355 88 1128 23 5:30 8 48 75 25 5 32 234 24 6 32 132 24 8 24 344 86 1080 27 5:45 5 42 69 26 5 25 229 22 4 22 144 22 9 15 324 76 1016 23 '. TOTAL 28 180 280 103 21 137 958 104 23 102 572 102 34 71 1356 346 4311 106 1 TOTAL 60 374 570 208 62 261 1919 217 50 200 1088 203 85 153 2692 659 8544 257 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THB PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAR HR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left South 4:15 PM 0.87 31 204 313 108 625 - 33 50 17 West 4:30 PM 0.95 36 149 986 117 1252 - 12 79 9 North 5:00 PM 0.93 23 102 572 102 776 - 13 74 13 East 4:45 PM 1.00 36 82 1370 355 1807 - 5 76 20 Entire Intersection South 4:45 PM 0.84 29 191 300 114 605 - 32 50 19 West 0.93 33 146 980 107 1233 - 12 79 9 North 0.92 27 103 556 111 770 - 13 72 14 East 1.00 36 82 1370 355 1807 - 5 76 20 1 31 TRAFFICOUNT .ite Code : FEDERAL WAY, WA. PAGE: 1 : PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH FILE: TP1818XP : SOUTH 348TH STREET • Movements by: Primary DATE: 6/30/98 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left South 4:15 PM 0.87 31 204 313 108 625 - 33 50 17 West 4:30 PM 0.95 36 149 986 117 1252 - 12 79 9 North 5:00 PM 0.93 23 102 572 102 776 - 13 74 13 East 4:45 PM 1.00 36 82 1370 355 1807 - 5 76 20 Entire Intersection South 4:45 PM 0.84 29 191 300 114 605 - 32 50 19 West 0.93 33 146 980 107 1233 - 12 79 9 North 0.92 27 103 556 111 770 - 13 72 14 East 1.00 36 82 1370 355 1807 - 5 76 20 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH N S rM :v: E—j—W : MagRO Y.Y.V.W':Y.M.W.W.V.W.W.W,:Y. [TRUCK] 29 191 300 114 ' 'w.::::::"``:` ':'`:'`:'"Y"'""` 33 [TRUCK] 'JJlf%%NIII%HIJIlJlJf/NJ!!I%'IINI1 1?? : I __ 605 ----I r 146 K SOUTH 348TH STREET 1233 980 355 i L 107 ' '"`''^ 1370 1807 SOUTH 348TH STREET ago Mgammagammm ;; n a y•::•::•::::::•::::::s:::•::: [TRUCK] 36 MONNIERWM 111 556 103 27 [TRUCK] ?•:::->: •:a::•;::•:•:::: ti>^" :µ;me: :; tiy PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH 32 - •'., ,I I I IUI AL_ I YU. • ebb v it 10 eJ Nov.115 1'9yti 5:51NM F'0.3 TRARFICODNT ;ite Code : FEDERAL WAY, WA. PAGE: 1 : STATE ROUTE 99 FILE: TG2528EP : STATE ROUTE 161 Movements by: Primary DAM 9/09/98 Time .. Frog West .... Prom North .... .... Prom Riot .... Prom South .... Vehicle TRUCK Begin TRICK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT Total Total 4:30 0 0 0 0 12 0 173 229 4 194 0. 0 9 0 105 0 701 25 9:45 0 0 0 0 8 U 165 235 9 191 0 4 6 0 100 0 698 23 AR TOTAL 0 0 0 0 20 0 338 464 13 300 0 4 15 0 205 0 1399 48 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4 0 177 235 6 173 0 3 4 0 119 0 707 14 5:15 0 0 0 0 8 0 196 241 5 193 0 1 5 0 107 0 738 18 5:30 0 0 0 0 10 1 169 22'! 10 132_ 0 1 1 0 123 0 653 21 5:45 0 0 0 0 9 0 182 227 3 143 .0 1 6 1 109 0 663 18 HR TOTAL 0 0 0 0 31 1 724 930 24 641 0 6 16 1 458 0 2761 71 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 7 0 153 192 5 174 0 2 5 0 9R 0 619 17 6:15 4 0 0 0 2 0 136 180 2 176 0 1 5 0 78 0 571 9 DAY TOTAL 0 0 0 0 60 1 1351 1766 41 1379 0 13 41 1 839 0 5350 145 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:30 PM - 6:30 PM DIRECTION START PEAK RR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left West 12:00 AM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North 5:00 PM 0.95 31 1 724 930 1655 - 0 44 56 East 4:30 PM 0.96 24 754 0 8 762 - 99 0 1 South 5:00 PM 0.93 16 1 458 .0 459 - 0 1100 0 Entire Intersection West 4:30 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 North 0.94 32 0 711 940 1651 - 0 43 57 East 0.96 24 754 0 8 762 - 99 0 1 South 0.91 24 0 431 0 431 - 0 1100 0 • 33 From : !RAFFICUUNT PHONE No. : 206 491 1079 Nov.05 1998 5:51PM P02 TRA?AICODRT Site Code : FEDERAL NAY, NA. PA01: 1 : STATE ROUTE 161 FILE: TG2188JP : S. 348TH STREET . Movements by: Primary DATE: 8/06/98 Time Ftom South From Reet ... From North From Rant Vehicle TRUCK Begin TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU GT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK IT THRU LT Total Total . WO PM 10 141 88 72 12 79 206 23 4 14 166 120 30 99 337 168 1513 56 4:15 7 115 110 80 21 68 219 7 4 8 143 79 18 70 372 242 1513 50 4:30 6 144 108 52 18 63 255 7 5 10 147 97 29 85 409 179 1556 50 4:45 6 111 101 63 6 60 209 10 3 17 146 106 26 80 338 202 1443 41 BR TOTAL 29 511 407 267 57 270 889 47 16 49 602 402 103 334 1456 791 6025 205 5:00 PM 9 122 95 72 20 109 259 11 3 2 130 133 17 72 414 174 1593 49 5:15 5 150 103 75 17 104 265 12 4 4 163 102 19 57 392 193 1620 4S 5:30 4 126 86 73 3 54 249 5 3 6 142 99 22 77 440 219 1504 32 5:45 2 129 107 75 19 01 257 10 3 10 175 112 15 88 378 191 1613 39 HR TOTAL 20 521 391 295 59 348 1030 38 13 22 610 446 73 294 1632 777 6410 165 DAY TOTAL 49 1038 798 562 116 618 1919 85 29 71. 1212 848 176 628 3008 1568 12435 370 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left South 5:00 PM 0.92 20 527 391 295 1213 - 43 32 24 Nest 5:00 PM 0.93 59 348 1030 38 1416 - 25 73 3 North 5:00 PM 0.91 13 22 610 446 -1078 - 2 57 41 East 5:00 PM 0.91 73 294 1632 777 2703 - 11 60 29 Entire Intersection South 5:00 RN 0.92 20 527 391 295 1213 - 43 32 24 Nest 0.91 59 348 1030 38 1416 - 25 73 3 North 0.91 13 22 610 446 1078 - 2 57 41 Bast 0.91 73 294 1632 777 2703 - 11 60 29 34 . 0 _ �C / 3 5.2. �.., • 10% 1g - N N 5 99 %moo W _ .r26 t 15% III0 �0 WJ23 ' 23 304TH ST ° �_5 6 IN 5 ,�^ 6 OUY' 3 33/ �33 r�` Y 5I 15 S308THST -_..j. 3 3_. 39 + 3 •• .`�' . �°O -4----1g f 3 IN = 0.................4___ 9 -.-14 j 3 S 312TH ST 39 y 2 I3 OUT I r I 9—� 14—► 2 t 19 67 �+ 4 IN -.__2?,-, % 316THTH 3 a 4 OUT 2—►� 57. 5 S 317TH T 17 2 31 57 41 0 2' y 26 _ N f 17—# 2 0 S 320TH ST •• ! 41 0 61 1 26—�• 3 h 3—.. 0 �— r .•--9 61 9_�. d 26 f `sires;,,, I ... 26SEATAC MALL I 9 6 IN 6 OUT I 3 S 324TH ST 26I /• r26 I 3 N N 1 IN 23 i 3 IN 0 • 1 0% 's', ( 1 OUT I is! jQ f23 3 OUT V .O . g .---10 d :-- S 336111 Sr 9 10-4". 10 1 3--_ .1 8 rn 2 IN j 10 tv 2 OUT w I SW z on cc• p WC a° 4 ,/ ) .- - ", ne / W '.4/t* 4hit_.7, , N S 348TH ST 4 WI4 x 4 - 7 i I 5% 17 NEW TRIPS (60%) 176 IN - 176 OUT I 96260.01 REV 6/16/97 352 TOTAL 11\96\96260\01\CAD\GRAPHIC(E) I RAINIER Figure 7R VIEW Revised Trip Assignment (New Trips) I PLAZA PM Peak Hour The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 35 I • N 5 t lS lit t 8 t �- 1 1 -•--4 } 13 1 7 12---0- 4_� -'--15 S 320iH ST 4 '4-4 21 t 16-► 14--► 4--► 4 . l 20 t 3 44 ,SE.1T.lC AfkLG ly 2 SW 330TH ST 10 • 35 t 33 10 13i1 v,t 8l> i� aii r--20 71 '� r 66 5� " 21—� N 7S ;pt 8 WY S� 68� J' 29 `' .� �� S 336Ti; ST �796-. 26 5 g -+ £ 5 97 4 i� t5 8 \3 \ '1 l\85 r 13 t 89 o�� 92 .a �'S 0'r'-103 107 ��� "5:` 1 14 18 107,� 99^` / » a 1g SITE --.-.. .i.. s 346111 ST s . r 19--► `� SEE FIGURE 9 4.-,7 '',<-- slf : �< t ice: 3 vl r N 4 CSo F28 q.. . 8 -4--13 SW 356TH ST �-6 13--0 28-� 5-. z. ,4 NET NEW PM PEAK HOUR SITE TRIPS 266 IN t .- 'i 258 OUT 524 TOTAL. 97251.01 REV 10/24/97 MA97\9,7251\CAIAGRAPHIC(E) . Waremart • Figure 8 - Total Project Trip Assignment Retail PM Peak Hour Development The TRANSPO Group, Inc. A / j err f' - Ate- ... /2 C . 5% N 1 rn10% -0-1 —2 S 320th St. N 1-0- ;—� not to scale (‘) t V1 in S 324th St. r 2 2-- PROJECT TRIPS PM Peak Hour 15 Enter I . 12 Exit 00 27 Total 21 �N C o, I—S S 328th St. ct u Project / `in t Site 1 5% '�� S 336th St. --o . �, , 2 0 1 � t. _ \ ' S 348th St...5%0 1 1 2�J \, 7/ i \ . AFO �/ , \ 6s • \ 1 c� C'SV . '0 (-1-' -L s 0 ° LEGEND xx% Trip Distribution Percentage <xx> PM PeaK Hour Traffic Volume • SITE—GENERATED PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND DISTRIBUTION 1FIGURE� SUNNYSIDE MOTEL UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 6 I . - r 8,1 q cc y Z cc North 25% NOT TO SCALE P 1 O 1 S 336th Street a N J1-L_ 6 � 41>.--...-6 17� —J i � � 24 �� I Lk_ `O 17 -- 8 1 Kir) y y a Q Q S. 10% 25% SITE + y ,/III 5% S 348th Street � J � 5% �0,It XJ � 1O% s 10 2 — — 1 e Q1 r 4 ^ � ti �1 1 r..) " e - -�J JL� 4 --- J �� �' � 11 10 ---- — 4 N 1 -Ell � 1 `� 3 �11 r-___,7 ll 20% I I / 7/,ii; 9TH/348TH OFFICE PROJECT T.I.A. • I / Trip Distribution and Assignment PM Peak Hour //// j N C. FIGURE 6 1 y 38 'I Is r 10X -. a \ '_. ' 5% 2X .r—5 S 320th St. 10X 0 a toX 1..--1, Np 5X f . ir7. . - --, CV' N ,�o S 324th St. (� i 5—► V, P L. 0 • • I- -510 2X. a �� 5 • �„eft, 4iti s/ Site I- f 20% 46% 1 12% -r-_10 .. -S S 336th St. ) (24 2X, 2 23--► •f 6' J �--_ 0c° P411 P 3 \tea CV 1 N �r �o �" us 0 \ i- 11 6 1 X �,. l 7 N %.. ° 9fi, 1% j-0, -^ S 348th St. 7X 3X 7X Nor 4 N a ti w c 0 N � �3 CC eW IliO f a la PROJECT TRIPS il PM Peak LEGEND Enter 10 X—► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction Exit 49 • Major intersection impacted by 10 or more PM peak hour trips I Iii i PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND DISTRIBUTION i FIGURE i GOLDEN STONE OFFICE BUILDING 6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 111 39 ill / . 10X a Nb i 2X 5% 5X .�-- J ��1 S 320th St. 1 3x _ tOX1 10 1 ox v.—v. 4—14.- N 7 �5X n • g ,. I "'es i S 324th St. 1 lox c • N 1 co s Ri N N i c w On 2X . II SA 53-5 e(h4� s WM j 1 "� 10Z Y 30z ix 29�—4 ��4 S 336ih St w J 1x 21_ 4.' 20—. . 7—► �— .moo�7 \" in 2x 29 V. Project • 2� Site < it �o w 348th St. f 21X 16X 9X 22X 15--► � 6 Nor U, a ■ Y < < q +• .;„ Q. n 3 u N C W w .' Q� " . t ao i r- �o / is ` S ■ `� \ p • PROJECT TRIPS PM Peak LEGEND Enter 14 X—► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction • Exit 70 ■ PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1 I I AND DISTRIBUTION [i FIGURE WASHINGTON PARK OFFICE BUILDING II r 6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS j d * /4% 41 ; ,...--... • ,c 7:---- 4. - ,/. i..,, 6 r _-_,p,A ., 7....----- 4;;1 1 / gi 49 8 1 ,f, / . Isirdi , SECOMA LANES 1 i 4/97 44; • I ________ ______ • • 9 •,,, , A . Or- . :•t li ... ; 41'4 .., '• liz "iiii 4, .."1 4''..• •OrM•101•01,10 I N i 1 s , . , ,,y• .% Furuk,E • ,-; •- .,...,,..,,,,._,,,,,,\= 0 1 4t. - "84 , 4.0 IIMINWOW1 i I 44 i 01 . _. 4i• 4 ch I 4° 4",4 , ..._... team. .4 qji /I 00 , ; maw ,......,,./st. } / Ill•• .-4!46574 ....... .. .f, •• i 0 19'dire Feference 0 , 1 tr , ,/ 4 .. . 50. '.4 4414# . 101151411114 i , ) •••••••011•A• 'i 444.- 41111:ea 65 MIT , --.. 6 HAWTHORN , —/ —— 4 i • ,I,i,„ la ax1E5 . . ,./., .. o .. ,;'' - I',., /4. 00••••••eraP am• ' Owil . , • ,c• . . li CD Iii t• 4,. . .. "9 . .,'i p -....— geir 4„,, i it WNW 4 E • "/, ,4 0 kip • 11 il II:': # 283 49609.09wFUTURE DEVELOPMENT 326r aso , • arl.-:Lr--- ----9011 -"I 1 . lic_ ttrall16."..1.7111° 111711111i"-Wir 1171711111 ir:---11"*.• iA.-"7-72---- .b• 1..2111iiaaatlizo--.... ......,,6* .. millh%b„,_' IF • IIAMIi4111111111:11 >-: 4 W ill ...AN,„.iiit i ,,,=. .-- .. 0058011411110b Le! . .1 -,.. ' . UAW c----- I • L.:1:-. .:: .'''*: Atilt —T 1 4 iti Z 0 (1) 4;$97,' . o. F/- ---.. 241.58' 7'1V' 11111"..W . k- . ' ''. ••••.doraiii -F---,•••7 --;- t,' tit s,/ 1.... / . -----___________ . :, zi. _,71 7.,____ .._._ _: 7:-, . ._--- lileil•_..b ,..M OL to zs°AWN/N Wi,d-lI 1.6-..5.7..a. t•/io;,,,i ,...'. ' .........--.--..-.-.•.----- a*n.l.i.a 0 see029 (ai)r•6, t___ to ://411; -. e itArA, - searoair 4 I ‘:1- < -•• W 41' 1.1 "70;111 I EfittA" ' (15t,0 i •-•••- -•••-, '' I = Crs i 4.•.,Nt.,- •-•'''' . - ,••V.: . . - .... ,. 1 , v . / , . a g / PRO-ECT INFORMATION SW bbia.SSA%SF/203 ACSIES (.D I I / /.<') 1 i 44 : P0/0440 REOU05,1 PER UV•65 WACO PROVOSO 75 EVACSS alSesa 14500.IV/440 1.10514f P05 CCCE SETBACX5 FaCalOPI4MaD 43" / --,-.., 0 2 , , , , - l ? 4 4 sk i 9 , , P •• 0 .. ) - 1 ---- (Ebb 0 SCES 0 U450SCAPP4G REOLMIESAINTS 5'nve 3•ROC= C061004104 ME Vi Lit 01040.ED CCCLP.CY.15-1 but014‘475)..MST 11.005 14465 SF. S4051011.0CP 11969 Sr. 111213 fkl0014 0.701 Sr. / k,i..,,, I V:N, • ki, s-k. I .. _., . 4$ , .588,° : _ TOTAL WS* 39355 Sr. _ ....--4\----...--- , ______--- g t g ceive.v., ' am 41 12. I I- —1---- — / / 414 S. 348TI-1 STREET I § • —. P. I PRELIM. HOTEL SITE PLAN ull LOT AREA 88,456 SE/2.03 ACRES ) / SCALE, r-40-0. ..y_ . i REGE -..-DEVEIJ , A . E II -•, , COMMUllnY 'J' JAN 2 8 1999 z10 � O N Z ON Q O\ O W O LO ICEZO C9 a LL lu Z Z a O 0 O Or% ao ` LLI N o U(D U O Z LO a z W • U O a �c a O CV O` ON a a O a m a 0 a O m W N N z 0 z z CIS � ui � Q � J cf) ~ _ W z 0 W LO CY LL o� z T = co Q U5 Z011 � >- Q F W O = � oc a VA W I - a 0 LU GO ON CO O co � W Z W W f� Q U) SURVEY INFORMATION PROCEDURE / NARRATIVE A FIELD TRAVERSE USING A "SOKKIA 3100" TOTAL STATION, AND "SDR-33" DATA COLLECTOR, SUPPLEMENTED DATES OF SURVEYS FIELD WITH FIELD NOTES WAS PERFORMED, ESTABLISHING THE ANGULAR, DISTANCE, AND VERTICAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS, PROPERTY LINES, AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS BY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. CONDUCTED Aug. 22 &Sept. 1, 1998 USED TO CHECK AND ESTABLISH THE ES AS SELEVATION HOWN ROFNBENCHMA KS AND CONTROL POIN-2A* AUTOMATIC TS. AS DRAWING REPRESENTS FIELD OENDTIED IIOR HESRESULTING DATA MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS FOR LAND BOUNDARY SURVEYS AS SET FORTH IN WAC 332-130-090. PRCONDITIONS ARE NOT REPRESS UNLESSTIONS NOTED OTHERWISE. HORIZONTAL DATUM - BASIS OF BEARINGS NOTE THE BEARING OF THE LINE BETWEEN THE FOUND MONUMENTS AT THE E.1/4 CORNER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND FEATURES DEPICTED HEREON ARE BASED ON AND THE W.1/4 OF SECTION 20 TAKEN AS North 88'46'12" West. FIELD OBSERVATION, MARKINGS, DEVELOPMENT PLANS, AND/OR AVAILABLE RECORD DOCUMENTS ONLY. THE TRUE LOCATION, NATURE AND/OR EXISTENCE VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF ELEVATIONS OF BELOW GROUND FEATURES, DETECTED OR UNDETECTED, SHOULD BE VERIFIED. NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 NGVE) 29 AS ADOPTED BY CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PROJECT BENCHMARK TOP OF 2-1/2" IN PIPE IN MONUMENT CASE IN CENTERLINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH (NEAR S.W. CORNER OF SITE) ELEV. - 276.88 FEET POWER POLE SITE BENCHMARK GUY ANCHOR SET PK NAIL IN ASHPALT ROADWAY (17' t FROM N.W. CORNER SITE) (SEE DRAWING) TELEPHONE J-BOX ELEV. - 288.48 FEET -1 FIRE HYDRANT- �• LEGEND POWER VAULT SURVEY MONUMENT (AS NOTED) rr*;O LUMINAIRE ♦ BENCHMARK YARD LIGHT SECTION CORNER (AS NOTED) POWER METER POWER POLE FOUND REBAR/CAP "LS 8992" ® JUNCTION BOX (AS NOTED) O FOUND LEAD/TACKnn ® TELEPHONE MANHOLE SURVEY CONTROL STATION ❑ CATCH BASIN © STORM MANHOLE ASPHALT O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CONCRETE o SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 0 GAS METER �Q GAS VALVE :: GRAVEL D4 WATER VALVE -w-----w--- WATER LINE FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY SEWER LINE ® WATER MANHOLE __- - - - - STORM DRAINAGE LINE ® WATER METER G- T(UG) GAS LINE TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND SIGN - P(Ur) POWER UNDERGROUND ® MONITOR WELL P(oH)- POWER OVERHEAD DIRECTION OF VEHICLE TRAVEL X CHAIN LINK FENCE - O BARBED WIRE FENCE TP.O.B. TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING El- HOG WIRECFENCE _ // WOOD r 0 a S 0 20 40 80 SCALE:1"-40' WATER VALVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES -A CCB-B RIM = 291.78 18" RCP N = 287.73 18" RCP S = 287.48 RIM = 290.08 18" RCP N = 286.13 18" RCP S = 286.03 CB-C RIM = 287.51 18" RCP N = 283.11 LUMINAIRE - 18" RCP S = 283.21 CB-D RIM = 285.21 18" RCP N = 280.49 18" RCP S = 280.35 CB-E RIM = 283.13 18" RCP N = 278. 71 18" RCP S = 278.80 CB-F RIM = 280.69 18" RCP N = 277.06 18" RCP S = 276.98 r / CB-G RIM = 278.20 12" CMP S = 275.66 CB-G CB-H RIM = 278.76 18" RCP N = 274.92 18" RCP S = 274.87 CB -I RIM = 276.41 12" CMP N = 274.45 WATER VALVE 15" D I S = 274.03 FND MOH. IN 1/ CB-J RIM = 276.98 18" RCP N = 273.69 CASE q CL OF 18" RCP S = 273.71 PAC. HWY. /1 CB-K R I M = 275. 31 18" RCP N = 272.46 POWER POLE 18" RCP S = 270.96 W/UG DROP e xti� CB-L RIM = 273.28 6" PVC NW = 271.16 CB- I ah 1 12" DI S = 271.01 y YD-A RIM = 273.68 6" PVC SE = 272.85 SSMH- B x / a STORM MANHOLES LIGHT J-BOX x SDMH-A RIM = 278.26 8" CORR N = 268.98 TRAFFIC J- OX i / 18" RCP S = 267.03 POWER P LE 36" CMP E = 267.01 W/UG ROP o` SDMH-B RIM = 278.23 ( OVERFLOW) = 276.29 18" RCP N = 267.13 36" CMP E = 267.47 h SDMH-C RIM = 279.69 (CTR DETEN. TANK) E&W = 259.26 T En SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES J , SSMH-A RIM = 286.08 8" PVC N = 270.74 I % 8" PVC S = 270.59 SSMH-B RIM = 275.78 6" PVC N = 265.34 6" PVC S = 265.21 SSMH-C R I M = 289. 21 8" PVC N = 275.68 8" PVC S = 275.30 % 2�yS i 2 f� / `U J/ 475/ 00 / 476 zoo / WATER VALVE -- TELEPHONE MH --_ SSMH-A --\ e WATER VALVE rl� NJrl� Jr 8unv o I 8.Jr111.� Y8, pi. i o� -P(OH)-d f .1288 � 06�ti EXISTING BUILDING 1/t P!' Y L I X � Ix '00 / b 1 ti FOR SAN SEWER (SSMH Not Found This Survey) BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PORTIONS of the N.E.1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of SECTION 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian City of FEDERAL WAY KING County State of WASHINGTON LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS (As per Chicago Title Insurance Company) PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 14 OF THE PLAT OF VICK ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGES 27 AND 28, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 14, 55.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY 70.54 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) SAID POINT BEING 64.00 FEET, AS MEASURED ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN, NORTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION LYING EASTERLY OF SAID STATE ROAD NO. 1; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY SOUTHH ALONG MARGIN 370.8 FEET OF THE SODUTHWEST QUARTER OFTHE TNORTHEASO THE OTR TH LINE OF THEQUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 105 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 258.12 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 19 OF SAID PLAT OF VICK ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 19 THROUGH 14 OF SAID PLAT TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 74.16 FEET OF THE SOUTH 370.8 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH). PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 85.00 FEET OF THE WEST 200 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 WITH THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 248TH STREET, SAID POINT BEING CAPPED IRON REBAR WITH PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IDENTIFICATION NO. 18903 AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED IN VOLUME 39, PAGE 219 OF SURVEYS AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8404099005; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 115.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00' 32' 05" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 266.64 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH-296.64 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 241.58 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID STATE ROAD NO. 1; SOUTH 21' 51' 05" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 78.14 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID MARGIN SOUTH 89' 59' 46" EAST 71.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61' 07' 25" EAST 57.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89' 37' 36" EAST 118.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00' 32' 05" WEST 222.48 FEET TO SAID NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 348TH STREET; THENCE SOUT 1 89' 37' 36" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 1 OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 97- 0005, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9710089007.) PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 85.00 FEET OF THE WEST 200 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTIONU20TE WITH THENORTHHMARGINEAST UOFTSOUTTH 348TH STREET, SAID POINT BEING A CAPPED IRON REBAR WITH PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IDENTIFICATION NO. 18903 AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED IN VOLUME 39, PAGE 219 OF SURVEYS AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO, 8404099005; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 115.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00' 32' 05" EAST PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 222.48 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE AFORESAID SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 118.20 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 61' 07' 25" WEST 57.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 59' 46" WEST 71,71 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE AFORESAID STATE ROAD NO. 1; THENCE SOUTH 21' 51' 05" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 33.40 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN A RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7509080425, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 89' 59' 46" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 111.89 FEET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 00' 32' 05" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 163.57 FEET TO THE AFORESAID NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 348TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH 89' 37' 36" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 140.24 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 2 OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 97- 0005, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9710089007.) TOTAL AREA OF EXISTING PARCELS "A", "B", and "C" 213,806 f Square Feet (or 4.90832 f Acres) NOTES 1. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER No. 525830 (DATED August 21, 1998 AT 8:00 A.M.) WAS RELIED UPON FOR TITLE INFORMATION AND RESEARCH. PLEASE REFER TO THAT REPORT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING FINANCIAL MATTERS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY. 41UNIiEDYDEVEELQPEL) yR�.���,�" JAN 2 W c LU o X 0 _U X a. QL a 0 v 0 Y U a. m0 o 4D o z z LL0 I- 0 _z Z z ♦�3: vJ w Q ^^Z 0 Q W w ■ ■ U. t` v � U N z o10 �- I I � (n Ili L�i N v (D C W Y a) w (D o -Ca 0 a' a L O 0 U Q x s a C II = H- N C� U a C (f z > O Z V n W ¢ c C ::D Z X L p F- z w x W 6 Q n N O N N 00 p (5 0✓ - I::j 00 N c0 z CT)z 00 z w N Q f � 3�: I Ww c LrD In �� 3 w N Z N 00 LLJ N --� > > U a U to � C N 0.0N� c c Z mo Q0 z a LU , W CO CJ� ON 00 0 CE � CID zN ' -C `mo w . _ 01 o co -0 o -' i r CALL BEFORE YOU DIGS 1-800-424-5555 LEGEND: PROPOSED TYPE I CATCH BASIN Y PROPOSED TYPE II CATCH BASIN 0 PROPOSED CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE EXISTING TYPE I CATCH BASIN ❑ EXISTING TYPE II CATCH BASIN 0 EXISTING STORM LINE - - - - - - - - PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS / EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT • PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE -t - PROPOSED WATERMAIN------- PROPOSED WATER VALVE W PROPOSED TEE FZI PROPOSED CONC. BLOCKING PROPOSED 90' BEND TI PROPOSED 45' BEND AA FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING WATERMAIN - - - EXISTING WATER VALVE Ixl EXISTING TEE Izi EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT S� STANDARD PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE: CAUTION: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTIILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE ® 1-800-424-5555 AND THEN POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING PERMITS FROM THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL SURVEY MONUMENTATION THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, PURSUANT TO WAC 332-120. APPLICATIONS MUST BE COMPLETED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS TO REMOVE MONUMENTS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, OR BY CONTACTING THEIR OFFICE BY TELEPHONE AT (206) 902-1190. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PUBLIC LAND SURVEY OFFICE 1111 WASHINGTON STREET S.E. P.O. BOX 47060 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-7060 UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL MONUMENTS DISPLACED, REMOVED, OR DESTROYED SHALL BE REPLACED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, AT THE COST AND AT THE DIRECTION OF THE CONTRACTOR, PURSUANT TO THESE REGULATIONS. THE APPROPRIATE FORMS FOR REPLACEMENT OF SAID MONUMENTATION SHALL ALSO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. COVER SHEET J l Grp. 3 r I! U. ' r <1 y. I %✓r l -! 6939' SECOMA LANES I ,(+}98,, r 0 00%; ' ' PARCEL A '' TAX LOT NO. 202104-9055 b b ~` FUTURE DEVELOPMENT b r G Ury i � / r6• V r, ! " NEW LOT LINE BY PROPOSED +r - - - - - - - ------------- - NW39'09'w B.L.A. ✓i- 1 u'y 212.61'------------- - - - - -- '1 I 00 PARCEL B A TAX LOT NO. 202104-9064 ; pp. . I tier r ,/! / r•�w 241.58' LOT 1 OF B.L.A. -TE ' /! / 5� { 1 if 5 '01'25*W 'CY - -- ( I r -4 414 \ , 00 s< j;/ F�ARCEL D � ; / LOT(,,'-2 OF B.L.A. N / TAJC LOT 202104-9060 / r I 00 it 41.'I I r-------------- R EXIST. ; E I ► =_ "s TACO BELL ;, 5 j `ll-------------�� z 39'091 q o - S. 3 4 8 t h STREET c_ _______________________________________________________________________________ i3__________ ---- •• I ------------------- I. ,J-?. INDEX TO SHEETS: III{- Ty Lv 11 Luvt� BY PROPOSED B.L.A. O v/ _ - ' , S88'391091E - ..-. z og W 0Cq O Ow "': LL: I- C1 OF 4 COVER SHEET C2 OF 4 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN C3 OF 4 PRELIMINARY WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN C4 OF 4 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC BOUNDARY SURVEY L1 OF 1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN t L VICINN MAP NTS HOWON rAL DATUM - BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARING OF THE LINE BETWEEN THE FOUND MONUMENTS AT THE E.1/4 CORNER AND THE W.1/4 OF SECTION 20 TAKEN AS North 88'46'12" West. VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF ELEVATIONS NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 AS ADOPTED BY CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PROJECT BENCHMARK TOP OF 2-1/2" IN PIPE IN MONUMENT CASE IN CENTERLINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH (NEAR S.W. CORNER OF SITE) ELEV. - 276.88 FEET SITE BENCHMARK SET PK "JAIL IN ASPHALT ROADWAY (17' f FROM N.W. CORNER SITE) (SEE DRAWING) ELEV. - 288.48 FEET LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS. (As per Chicago Title Insurance Company) PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 14 OF THE PLAT OF VICK ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGES 27 AND 28, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 14, 55.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY 70.54 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) SAID POINT BEING 64.00 FEET, AS MEASURED ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN, NORTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION LYING EASTERLY OF SAID STATE ROAD NO. 1; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 370.8 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 105 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 258.12 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 19 OF SAID PLAT OF VICK ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 19 THROUGH 14 OF SAID PLAT TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 74.16 FEET OF THE SOUTH 370.8 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH). PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF DIE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 85.00 FEET OF THE WEST 200 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 WITH THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 248TH STREET, SAID POINT BEING CAPPED IRON REBAR WITH PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IDENTIFICATION NO. 18903 AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED IN VOLUME 39, PAGE 219 OF SURVEYS AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8404099005; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36' WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 115.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 09 32' 05' EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 266.64 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE CF THE SOUTH 296.64 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36' WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 241.58 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID STATE ROAD NO. 1; SOUTH 21' 51' 05" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 78.14 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID MARC:N SOUTH 89' 59' 46" EAST 71.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61' 07' 25' EAST 57.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89' 37' 36" EAST 118.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00' 32' 05' WEST 222.48 FEET TO SAID NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 348TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH 89' 37' 36" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 1 OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 97- 0005, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9710089007.) PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 85.00 FEET OF THE WEST 200 FEET OF THE SOJTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SA) SECTION 20 WITH THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 348TH STREET, SAID POINT BEING t. CAPPED IRON REBAR WITH PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IDENTIFICATION NO. 18903 E.3 SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED IN VOLUME 39, PAGE 219 OF SURVEYS AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8404099005; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36' WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 115.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAD SECTION 20; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT C•= BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00' 32' 05' EAST PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 222.48 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE AFORESAID SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF SAID SUBD`/ISION; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36' WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 118.20 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTLINE SOUTH 61' 07' 25" WEST 57.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 59' 46' WEST 71.71 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE AFORESAID STATE ROAD NO. 1; THENCE SOUTH 21' 51' 05" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 33.40 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THAT CERTAA TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN A RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7509080425, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 89' 59' 46" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 111.89 FEET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 00' 32' 05" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 163.57 FEET TO THE AFORESAID NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 348TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH 89' 37' 36" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 140.24 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 2 OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 97- 0005, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9710089007.) TOTAL AREA OF EXISTING PARCELS 'A', 'B', and 'C' 213,806 f Square Feet (or 4.90832 f Acres) TOTAL AREA TO BE DEVELOPED (PHASE 1) NOTES 89,950'f S.F. (OR 2.065f ARCES) 1. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER No. 525830 DATED August 21, 1998 AT 8:00 A.M.) WAS RELIED UPON OR TITLE INFORMATION AND RESEARCH. PLEASE REFER TO THAT REPORT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING FINANCIAL MATTERS BEYOND THE P SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY. O 3 C 0 2 1999 0 .N 0 41 6 z ~ h W W � � 2 CO Z W CC 0 d U Q 0 W S (0 < • j! C UL 1 co 0 •R • 0 ui 0 o to N 0 o � Ell 0 0) > \ z ti 7 Q OI O C O • 3 0 0 a> a o C) Q o = U) w Z > O z LLJ Ld z X ¢ 0 Z Lz L1J N LL g Q 1`0 O N N N 00 pZ z> z 00 07 N (D r 00 W z N I I w w CD Lc) L 0 0 z_ �� W 00 Yz U Lv) E 00 41 z o �-- 0 I.. w File: P:\SDSKPROJ\6780\PRELIMINARY\6780-PO.DWG Date./Time: 12/02/1999 14:31 Scale: =50 brianw Xrefs: Z6780-B,Z6780-S,Z6780-T, w N 19m,10 4 1 L CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 PARCEL TAx LOT No. 22 m55 A I 5; WCU,T-/' 273.5t 1 SINE j ;I MATCH EX. 0/1. P `,'',`t(�m}: N I ;SANITARY SE I ER EASEMENT i F RE:C- No. 7 70" 151036 297. 96 N88'42'16"W 70.54' E PLAN c) :I , i : ^2 A o-4 N 1, 289.2 \' __4 --- F is 5: 68 (8 Ix-f H •275.30 k8,:/ n --- \ 3 a 7 � r f. F i 285.0 r.. r , t t ; x� f t t � f i r� f EX. CH:1i�1L.31't1; I °y '- PROPOS FEW D BUILDING F.F. ELEV.=285-00 1;,�, J j Nr� RIM=279.©t IE=26.75 x EX. SSMH TYPE 2-54" RIM=278.5t IE=267.5 If' I �- lI o -] h -A-0. Ll 0 L 1t L TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 767460 s.f. APPROXIMATE CUT = 41000 O.Y. APPROXIMATE FILL =1,500 c.y. ESTIMATED EXPORT = 2500 c.y. w c� z O N LL z Q a a (� L.Lo v Y U m 1= CC O z � 0 z i h (0 I— 5 N c�ca 0� 0cl) h z Q Cp C!J 0 00 W 0*) z� a co0co 0 z :E 00 T- o) N c O °o_ N < U N II z O r > �i 'O C -�e .213;U 2 N 0 0 U < l Ld ASEMENT OV 1035 -` g U) LIJ a- z W X Z z w Q N � 00 z 00 N 0-) CO 00 w z N Q I I ww Ln Ln 0 z EX. 8" SS ► - j j w 00 Y d. v V) rl v Ahm -Nil �;, 672 � ' �4 �FSS0G/25STE��G\�� NA L L EXPIRES 9/23/01 1 w z o O 0 N 0II 1 r:I-- P. \ C(l CllDort 1\ a-74n\ oon IA Alt,I Anv\ C�n —A n—A n_i_ /r:.___. +n /nn /a nnn 'l— nr , CALL BEFORE YOU DIG: 11-800-424-5555 �V �w 4# U %�`� .1 f, ti n -- s � L• u; 4; 4I - � i :i•'' f� 1 ? 6 290 / 1 =50' Pv'd'%ER POLE - \ i GUY ANCHOR-••. IELEPHONE J-E:i,:< ` '. s'{LEPHONE MH- SSW: i-A f POWER POLE i --EX. 10" W EASEMENT —EX. 6" W (REMOVE AND REPLACE W/8" WM) L EX. CAP REMOVE AND EXTFND W/8" W EX -TINC; Bi i 1L I'!G PROPOSED 1,�J< . UTILITY EASEIIT REMOVE WEND 8" W ;/; CL ce...,: 4jz / ! / 'tie c _H " EX. F.H; E". 10' W EASEMENT ° 12f LF 8 WIM ; -------- \----- N88'39'09iV------- _ _ 25 LF 8" DI` WATER VJ.:srF-, $ ss � ° ----------- - 21Z61 FNG -MON. IP1... \ // , / f \ — 2so1 , -I F 15' WATER i /f _ I CASE, 0 cL OF /--15' WATER — — h � �� I• PAC. :. wV. \ // f / // (TYPICALQ 2 LF 8' W EASEMENT 151 LF 8" W pe TYPICAL $ w!u nDROP'•'� :\.. //� i i � �PARCEL� �r-�•+R--- 3 LF 8" W EX. 10' , x LOT No. 0 1 0 - 4 ` ' SANS ` - 1 ^ i FIITUR t EASMENT" ' S 'tH-e��, R.BAR� �� S88'39 09 tWsAIL7fi.{IN i+!% P z=as9 \` ' a '- ; ' _ ...-. _�... 1 No. 7702 `; UJZr L.t:;H: -B^_X �3 -114 ° //----------------------_N88'39091Y---- _ l F•: s?sts=�"'.^ � ;— �F -' I o //� i \ // Jai f'�LviAF S R�-RJ4L iiLc 24�.58' S - - � { �b� ' •w•' F.� I. �- — J . X � �. � Tpb*llC Ort s S7Li �j�� ,� e'�'R _ •s.� � � :S e r�; � PO'sER PFE.FF.Rt=FCi'37• `r I ------------- — ----- ;,s " k`6. J�:i Rf2? a� ,�( - - '.. ./�.._... • �` ='. t°"'�'-II�1 •......E�L....— — i r 1 EX. 8 SS / ,% �� . _ -•xf "f ,F 1 , .� l „ 7 I ROAR i ------- 0 fOR FAIN SEVER S:;kl 4 F.<rd TW 5 ) � a EX. SSMH (APPROX. LOCk'TION) n "':h h 5P10a P9;� Y / uo w r JaS- UNE ti I T W — — — —5' a a m i RA> POWER rLE- �-:., f•.�t:LL ,,i{i'+ -�: °� _LICIT J-wKr —W — Wiv GM:rlf --' — — L'.:'vt''vAr k - —=ate - -- - _'•��'�'� .,;J,, S. 343TH STREET ❑ ------ $:R�, - - - s>H- ------------------------------ H----------- ------------------------------------------- -------------------- - - - - -- ------------------- II ------------- ------------- ------------- ----- ----- --ff---------- -------------------- K• Bq- ���• G O N CK U h -19 0 o -2 (o 0# w, Co 0 *R L. LL 0 CO U L (� _ 0 rll d Z o 0 U a Q o 0 = V) CD � z> O g V) Lj LL J Z X Q 0 F¢- z Ld w N t L_ g :2 Q O N N N 00 zp of Z> M zrnc0oo 00 N r-- Wz N r, I I LL W S Lf) L0 z Ln CN Ln Lo j wCN — z ZS C bb y V z w 2 40 N5 p CO File: P:\SDSKPROJ\6780\PRELIMINARY\6780-PWS.DWG Date/Time: 12/02/1999 13: 2 Scale: 1 =50 brionw Xrefs: Z6780-1316780-S.Z6780- . 0 x• 9 5672 O �C� .0 0 Fs F0l S T E�� ��`` E 00 s/DNA L F �G Z - V) EXPIRES 9 23 01 1 7 U SURVEY INFORMATION PROCEDURE / NARRATIVE DATES OF SURVEYS A FIELD TRAVERSE USING A "SOKKIA 3100" TOTAL STATION, AND "SDR-33" DATA COLLECTOR, FIELD SURVEYS BY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. SUPPLEMENTED WITH FIELD NOTES WAS PERFORMED, ESTABLISHING THE ANGULAR, DISTANCE, AND CONDUCTED Aug.VERTICAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS, PROPERTY LINES, AND TOPOGRAPHIC 22 & Sept. 1, 1998 FEATURES AS SHOWN HEREON. A "LIETZ 8-2A" AUTOMATIC LEVEL WAS USED TO CHECK AND THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS FIELD CONDITIONS AS OF THOSE DATES; ESTABLISH THE ELEVATION OF BENCHMARKS AND CONTROL POINTS. THE RESULTING DATA MEETS PRIOR CONDITIONS ARE NOT REPRESENTED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. OR EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS FOR LAND BOUNDARY SURVEYS AS SET FORTH IN WAC 332-130-090. HORIZONTAL DATUM - BASIS OF BEARINGS NOTE THE BEARING OF THE LINE BETWEEN THE FOUND MONUMENTS AT THE E.1 /4 CORNER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND FEATURES DEPICTED HEREON ARE BASED ON AND THE W.1/4 OF SECTION 20 TAKEN AS North 8W46'12" West. FIELD OBSERVATION, MARKINGS, DEVELOPMENT PLANS, AND/OR AVAILABLE RECORD DOCUMENTS ONLY. THE TRUE LOCATION, NATURE AND/OR EXISTENCE OF BELOW GROUND FEATURES, DETECTED OR UNDETECTED, SHOULD BE VERIFIED. VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF ELEVATIONS NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 NGVD 29 AS ADOPTED BY CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PROJECT BENCHMARK TOP OF 2-1/2" IN PIPE IN MONUMENT CASE IN CENTERLINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH POWER POLE - (NEAR S.W. CORNER OF SITE) ELEV. - 276.88 FEET GUY ANCHOR - SITE BENCHMARK SET PK NAIL IN ASHPALT ROADWAY (17' t FROM N.W. CORNER SITE) TELEPHONE J-BOX (SEE DRAWING) ELEV. - 288.48 FEET FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE -- TELEPHONE MH © POWER VAULT L-L""%AL-1 SURVEY MONUMENT (AS NOTED) 1 ��- LUMINAIRE + BENCHMARK LN�0 YARD LIGHT rj+r SECTION CORNER (AS NOTED) L-I POWER METER • FOUND REBAR/CAP 'LS 8992" -C- T3 POWER POLE JUNCTION BOX (AS NOTED) o FOUND LEAD/TACK (D TELEPHONE MANHOLE / A SURVEY CONTROL STATION ❑ CATCH BASIN ASPHALT ( STORM MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CONCRETE O SANITARY SEWER CUEANOUT l 9>� GAS MEIER � GRAVEL I1 GAS VALVE WATER LINE G4 WATER VALVE ................... ........... : SANITARY SEWER LINE R FINE HYDRANT = _ _ _ _ = STORM DRAINAGE LINE ® WATER MANHOLE -c c- GAS LINE EB WATER METER T(UG) TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND SIGN - P(UG) POWER UNDERGROUND MONITOR WELL P(oH)- POWER OVERHEAD DIRECTION OF VEHICLE TRAVEL X O CHAIN LINK FENCE_ BARBED WIRE FENCE TP.0 3. TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING n N FENCE ( ` /, WO � DRAINAGE STRUCTURES CB -A RIM = 291.78 18" RCP N = 287. 73 18" RCP S = 287.48 CB-B RIM = 290.08 18" RCP N = 286. 13 18" RCP S = 286. 03 CB-C RIM = 287.51 18" RCP N = 283. 11 18" RCP S = 283. 21 CB-D RIM = 285.21 18" RCP N = 280. 49 18" RCP S = 280. 35 CB-E RIM = 283.13 18" RCP N = 278. 71 18" RCP S = 278. 80 CB-F RIM = 280.69 18" RCP N = 277.06 18" RCP S = 276.98 CB-G RIM = 278.20 12" CMP S = 275.66 CB-H RIM = 278.76 18" RCP N = 274. 92 18" RCP S = 274. 87 CB -I RIM = 276.41 12" CMP N = 274.45 15" DI S = 274.03 CB-J RIM = 276.98 18" RCP N = 273.69 18" RCP S = 273. 71 CB-K RIM = 275.31 18" RCP N = 272. 46 18" RCP S = 270. 96 CB-L RIM = 273.28 6" PVC NW = 271.16 12" DI S = 271.01 YD-A RIM = 273.68 6" PVC SE = 272.85 STORM MANHOLES SDMH-A RIM = 278.26 8" CORR N = 268. 98 18" RCP S = 267. 03 36" CMP E = 267.01 SDMH-B RIM = 278.23 ( OVERFLOW) = 276.29 18" RCP N = 267.13 36" CMP E = 267.47 SDMH-C RIM = 279.69 96" CMD E&W = 267.43 (CENTER DETENTION TANK) SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SSMH-A RIM = 286.08 8" PVC N = 270.74 8" PVC S = 270.59 SSMH-B RIM = 275.78 6" PVC N = 265.34 6" PVC S = 265. 21 G H'q(I SSMH-A Q- S' S ? - / LIGHT J-BOX v, / �G�' �"� s73l 7! S'-.-.---, "------------------- --W58_39"09"W --- � I � Dr�H G... ----� LUMINAIRE RAILR -- 1 5 zt. x h oq 241.58 :. � G �• / D ... R r �t. .., ��. ., P� . ES , 1 .: ...IL .,�o f 1 •;. � :'. _.." .. � E ,L. o. TRAFFIC J- 0 C \ / / • • ..... P00��7AUL �. :....:.... ��. z W - - F�. ... R D. ABOVE :GROUND) �RAV 0 T `�= V- o - - - o,,� ................. ? bL.... SDMH-A --" r -< POWER P LE - / hti UNDERGROUND AD ..� [ ( /\')N ,oci xti ��. J l ' 1-\) `'�� -,J ,� . JYP J.�.ri. n -FenEe L RO,.... ..... W/UG ROP o / 2j6� `` " FOUND REBAR _ TEL. VAULT W CAP OBLITERATED ^)�� .0 S8d'39`09nE •SDMH-B o� x ABOVE GROUND w 7fl0 e ' -q, CH A I N L I N K='F E N C E WOOD F E <¢:4C E s PAIL. ,.,•,•.,, VE �" , /�-ABLE J-BOX A�h�9 ti\ ' 0 501�3 'S9"�W 0 0 F E N C E FOR SAN SEWER S88'39 09 E h 6 �� /11,-.1 tPilnln as nnNr11 FOUND REBAR w�' ti , ' 1; Q I ,, (SSMH Not found This Survey) T` �"" / tAJLMLNI MK INUKLZO oc tUrtta3 rUUINU KLbAK v�r+Rv rvai - ry - x- cx, i\L-".. ivU. , , U� 1 J 1 Ll �j SSMH-C RIM = 289. 21 8' PVC N = 275. 68 p c� M REC. No. 6528153 W/CAP 14469 8" PVC S = 275. 30 � d Z N N PARCEL D 5 Lv I r ) LUMINAIRE 5 / L a, 2 a� F.L ,,, I� r' r'r I r I r r r1r - r r / rr'r r r JrJr1�I�� TAx LOT No. " A o o� ,.11J JJ, �J7 ��11� riJ�, ��-tJ1J 2021 ❑ 4- 9 0 6 ❑ SIGN ti 30� INGRESS &EGRESS EASEMENT o ti 99 0 o PER LEASE REC. NO. 9710101406 00 9. i TACO BELL (xti C- ----------------- TEL. J-BOX EASEMENT FOR INGRESS & EGRESS o N POWER POLE / REC. No. 6528153 �., SIGN n tl e" , ` W/TRA.NS. LINE _ I W/UG DROP n \\\ a ELECTRIC LINE EASEMENT REC. No. 6287308, 588'39'fl9 PIOH I POWER VAULT �ti �a (UNDERGROUND) 416 POWER POLE P(OH)- iOH� -- - t P(OH) 00 - - - SIGN TRAFFIC J-BOX W/TRANS. LINE POWER POLE pRIV 6`1 TACO BELL SIGN " swAY LIGHT J-BOX 7 - W/UG DROP SIDCWAL".- "-LUMINAIRE 8. 348th W BTREET ---- - - - SSMH-B ----------------- -------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, PORTIONS of the N.E.1/4 of the S.R. 1/4 of SECTION 20 W C Township 21 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian City of FEDERAL WAY KING County State of WASHINGTON ' "C ,' C oC O .T > .w-y (D Cd LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS (As per Chicago Title Insurance Company) 0 C 1 �j �y Uj PARCEL A: o ( C'6 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 01 `Y OD C� 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, M ,�•�,' WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1,,,J COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 14 OF THE PLAT OF VICK ADDITION, p a" ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 45 OF PLATS, PAGES 27 AND o 28, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON- THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 14, 55.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Z Ll.l.. THENCE WESTERLY 70.54 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 OF • SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. a PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) SAID POINT BEING 64.00 FEET, AS MEASURED ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN, NORTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PORTION OF y��••• C THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE�.- SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION LYING EASTERLY OF SAID STATE ROAD NO. 1; `` v „ LIJ THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO THE NORTH LINE OF tir-• cm in THE SOUTH 370.8 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF Cn Uj THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; Of M m lJ. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST "' `` E QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; rn rn THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST o C.4 QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; to THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 105 FEET OF G3 THE WEST HALF OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE c,4r SOUTHEAST QUARTER; z THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 258.12 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 19 OF SAID PLAT OF VICK ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 19 THROUGH 14 OF SAID PLAT TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 74.16 FEET OF THE SOUTH 370.8 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. IL 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH).r�� l/✓ 0 PARCEL C: W THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE-• NORTHEAST '-'""•• QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC r HIGHWAY SOUTH), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: �✓! COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 85.00 FEET OF THE W WEST 200 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 WITH THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 248TH STREET, SAID POINT BEING CAPPED IRON REBAR WITH PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IDENTIFICATION NO. 18903 AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY Er " >- RECORDED IN VOLUME 39, PAGE 219 OF SUR`:1 S AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8404099005; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST ALONG SAID �+-y NORTH MARGIN 115.00 FEET TO THE V J EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST "�(r QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; r y. THENCE NORTH 00' 32' 05" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 266.64 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 296.64 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 241.58 FEET TO THE ...,j SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID STATE ROAD NO. 1; .,w+ SOUTH 21' 51' 05" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 78.14 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID MARGIN SOUTH 89' 59' 46" EAST 71.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61' 07' 25" EAST 57.49 FEET; 1 r THENCE SOUTH 89' 3'' 36" EAST 118.20 FEET; • ■ • THENCE SOUTH 00' 32' 05" WEST 222.48 FEET TO SAID NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 348TH STREET; In THENCE SOUTH 89' 37' 36" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 30.00 FEET TO THE W TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 1 OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 97- O 0005, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9710089007.) Li - PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 v o NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING N 1 EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (A.K.A. PACIFIC ' - z HIGHWAY SOUTH), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (n _ > COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 85.00 FEET OF THE WEST 200 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 WITH THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 348TH i� s a) STREET, SAID POINT BEING A CAPPED IRON REBAR WITH PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR I Of MI N IDENTIFICATION NO. 18903 AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED IN VOLUME 39, PAGE 219 OF SURVEYS AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8404099005; n ate) 00 THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 115.00 FEET TO THE �) N 3 v n a) EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE o o v d n SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00' 32' 05" EAST PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 222.48 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE AFORESAID SOUTH 252.48 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89' 37' 36" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 118.20 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 61' 07' 25" WEST 57.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 59' 46" WEST 71.71 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE AFORESAID STATE ROAD NO. 1; THENCE SOUTLd H 21' 51' 05" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 33.40 FEET TO THE _ v NORTH LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN A RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7509080425, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, p z w WASHINGTON; W cn THENCE SOUTH 89' 59' 46" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 111.89 C FEET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF; W THENCE SOUTH 00' 32' 05" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 163.57 FEET TO THE Q © L AFORESAID NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 348TH STREET; W �- LLd THENCE SOUTH 89' 37' 36" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 140.24 FEET TO THE � N z TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 2 OF CITY OF FEDERAL Q N CD N N p 00 WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 97- z > 0005, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9710089007.) cfl 00 Lk z TOTAL AREA OF EXISTING PARCELS "A", 'B', and "C' 213,806 f Square Feet (or 4.90832 t Acres) NOTES 1. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER No. 525830 (DATED August 21, 1998 AT 8:00 A.M.) WAS RELIED UPON FOR TITLE INFORMATION AND RESEARCH. PLEASE REFER TO THAT REPORT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING FINANCIAL MATTERS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY. < Ln Ln LO c� z h �I7 Ln Lw ��� - z C7 G coN E 00 z os U) W. POWER FOLIr-\ GUY ANCHOR-� TELEPHONE J-eO FIRE HYDRANT --`?- WATER VALVE-' TELEPHONE 6SMH- A - ................. — ................................... ............. ............... — ........................... .............................. ................... ------- 7. - - - - /- - r - -/- —7— LUMINA WATER VAL P40 MoN IN -\ CASE 0 C-L OF PAC- AVr. POUTER PO WAJG DROP 56MH 5 LIGHT J-50 TRAFFIC J- POWER VOL LlJ/UG PROP 414 WATER VAL WATER VAI 2 VVL a 2o4 POWER POLE W/TELEPHONE J OF 5UFRVE"T� f=G, 169 5UFIVE NT EXH15 LOT LINE gDJU,5T�IE 1/ �p T EASEMENT F�R SLOPES DRAINAGE 4 45E5< 22, suRvET'5/ FG; PEr-,'No. 52120105113 LOI livic< T k, A SECOMA LANES /07 51U.Cor. Lot I - - ----------------- ---------- ....... ............... ------ ------------ ......... ........ ................................................ ------------ -- - -------- --------------------------- J ---- ------------------ - ------------ GUY ANCHOR\ N, P min.type III 14V 551-01 800014 to prop. Ilse of exist. b-Allie" 11*10 —land in-11 two III WAP --M 42,E %, E\/tLpIFMENT C9 FUTURE 0 J 51-01 mtrLr III note no irr SIGN landsoap Fr . 20'WICD pavad01) Fire access C9 1:S1 E rack IN 4v C9 access to ruture businwe I '4 aly� F ocls" to Gel turs bus C9 barch trash III Pat tnese .. ...... POWER POLE Tax Lot No, 2 021 0 -4- w/-rELEFHoNE 202' �P- FUTURE DEVELOPMENT -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- 2L2.61' A :' / ►� \ fax Lot No. 202104 0 (o 4 1 I 138 FOUND REBAR W/CAP 14469 --------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------- ............. .7 241MI 42 7 ...... . . ... N a to *tract (UN ERGRRIO Lo t J -L 'I / TEL. VAULT FOUND MH- WICAF OBLITERATED %W 1(45OVE GROUND) sm"391091B t % Q) U- 01 A# % % 1.4 :3 0 EXISTING 51. ILDING 01 3'-O'wlde Fire assess waksag LIJ Z X horizontal traits at 3 10-10- Air is land— IrW.t S) Z piIII E3 v R i Z < II (3 r' hI9ugh j t ,Iw MTrL LU w LU LU IL IZ �D RK LU FORISEWER (56MH Not Found This 8weW at wall larcle 4 op. Irmo 'CABLE J-BOX A--- LU I&" v r= R 7. U 5 FOUND REeAR 7 5 W/CA 110S LUMINAIRE 0 CA 11, D�7 TArn ELL 5 W-0,type III — . . . . . . land P1 XQ boa McDONALD PARKING LOT V% ......... ... ........... X ............. c:�-jj000e007 -SIGN T RE$$ tlG AGE SIT'S R-'r SEWER EASEMENT ........ 5ANITA . . . . . . . . . . ...... REC41PROCAL E,�,'O'EMENT FOR STORM DRAIN REG. No. 110215103(o (P REC, No,"B110210(055 GUARD P05 REG. No. 1102151031 (P CA EASEMENT FOR Wl;?p5S 4 EGRESS FOUND RE54R IN,, REC. No, (0525153 UJ/CAP 14469 W sq L LUMINAI <NG3 LOT LINE ADJ, 2a4010 Lot 2 F 5 -L,,4. Tax Lot No, LIU- I _project information 10 -Q1 251 5, 20210-4-W&O SIGN site area: 88,456 s.FJ 203 acres parking: re quired: per unit - 65 spaces E3< e;Cr119d;1P, spaces 16, Building height: 45'max height per code LU 44'proposed height setbacks. front 20' rear o sides 0, landscaping requirements: 5' type 3 6 permeter construction v-1 hr sprinkled TACO BELL occf* ancyr!�pe: bull Tng ar ea.- first floor: 14W s.f. Second floor: 11,13513 s.f. TEL. J-BOX Third floor: 12,1013 s.f. POWER POL W/TRAN5. LINE GB-H 1,01 a. [Fog rr 15 PARKING SPACES Zx 39021 a/r paved peWing 'r stampald Toro. wak ( tV. 1�61fl li:: I a v tD tu lol- 0142 mix) W-Virin. t III ]andecappMg�e LINE 'Jill va a 15 x 15 6' high wall& rut" loubm"s bk ... I to r"r- Will IK T, . . ............. - . ..... . ............ L*08CAPIng note .poet sl qqrom �� 'fire eccese Faro -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --- — -------- Vold HOTEL ACCESS -1 --- r1re access in — — ---- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — WOOD FLufCE 5EMENT FOR INGRESS 4 EGRESSNPOWER POLE total area: 3%355 s.f. W/TRAN6. LINE REC, No. 6525153 SIGN WArs DROP ... ..... .... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ---- ---- --- .... ..... ... . ..... ELECTRIC LINE EASEMENT Ln REG. No. 6251 POWER VAULT Ah30 All, (UNDERGROUND) UH,L (k (OH)-- 1. Z F ................................ TRAFFIC J-BOX SIGN N39 0 37 1 36 1W POWER POL TACO IBELL 51 LIGHT J-BOX o w1urs DROP —LUMINAIRE > SOtWALIK Z 4 �Iir 5. 3 4 a t h 5 T R ET SSMH-5 ------------------------------------------------- ------- — ------------------------- - — --- - ------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ------------------------ 74-5 E N F �RE LC7E Liiiiiii::1iTEL 5FLAN #11 lot area W,456 s.f./ 2.03 acres S11 C,4 Z w 5 SCALE: 11 = 40-0l Q) C- 0 v V z 3 O <r-�- NNFri zNNO Z z c�Z N cyl N cn�sv C.TI D r*1 m Z X <Z I O0 I Cn (C) N Z v N 00 0 Z N N C4 D m� Z N Z X C -� rri N Z rl cn O < Z -Cf (A_ r1 � b61� o v s U ` N n F to W 7 > t� a a o �O _ < O Z CD_ II ni D Ln 0 o 0 0 i Al 0 m m m m —i (n 0 m v v M m O' 3 3H1 ONOA38 S831LVN-MONVNij 9NI021V9321 N011 Wa0.3Nns S1?13H1HI 0 380-4 dO3S 1MOd3M 1VH1 01 83AN 3SV31d 'H02NS38 ONV NOLLYR803N1 31111 80j NOdn 03113d SVM 04'V 00:8 1V 9661 '1Z ;sn6nV 031VO) 0£89Z9 'ON 83080 ANVdW03 33Nb nSNl TULL 09V31HO *L S=toN ("J*V T Z£8064 JO) }oed aonbS T. 908'£IZ '0' Pus '•8• •d• STIiyd JNUZOG =lO y=IUV -'101 -L6 'ON 1N3yv.Lsn py 3Nn AMy0Nnoe AVMp-vd3033 O'ONNI1,110038 j0 Z31101 SVONMONH OSIV) 3HI Ol 1333 bZ'04l NI9MVW H18ON ONS 9NOIV 1 :9NINN1038 j0 1NIOd 3n81 9£ !13381S H19b£ Hinos "IO,L�L£ .68 H18ON ON (1 33N3H1 3H1 01 133.4 L9'£9l 3Nn 1SV3 QIVS 9NOlV 1S3M O90Z£C.00HlnOSN30N33HI 69111 j0 33Nb1SI0 V 3NII H18ON ONS 9NOltl ISO 383H1 3NII 1S3 3HI Ol 1333 "94 ,69 .69 HinOS 30N3Hi 'UN103 9NIN j0 S080038 '9Z4080609L 'ON ONM1003M 830Nn 030W038 kWns jO 080038 V NI 038183S30 SV ONVI j0 13V81 NIV1833 1VHl j0 3NII H18ON 3HI Ol 133.4 Ob'££ N19MVW A1831S3 QIVS ON07V 1S3M 90 ,l9 .1Z HinOS 30N3H1 3H1 j0 N19MVW Ala31SV3 3H1 01 133j lL'lL 1S3M 9ti 690 69 H180Nro30N33HI :1334 64'L9 ISM"9Z ,LO .19 HinOS 3NII N1MON (In9NIA31 33N3H1 :133A OZ'81l 3NII HIHON QIVS 9NOIV 1S3M "9£ ,L£ .69 H16ON 33N3H1 Hinds GIVS380JV 3H1 30 3NII H18ON 3H1 Ol 133J 84 !NO I3OnNV JO 1333 WZ9Z 331S10 V NO SIM08f1S ONS j0 3NII 1S3 OIVS HIM 13IIV8Vd 1S3 SO ,Z£ .00 H18ON 33N3H1 00'OS ISM ,9£ ,L£ .69 H18ON NIONVW H180N ONS ONOIV ONUINI1NO3 33 3H1 3H1 30 31MVf1O 1S3H180N 3H1 :OZ N01133S aivs .10 30 8318vno lS Hinds aNSn 013NN11 Sb3 3H1 01 1333 00'911 MOWN H18ON QIVS ONOW 1S3M .9£ ,Lf .69 H18ON 30N3H1 3rinlOA0 NI603080038 k3Aens jOM080338 V3NO NMOHS SV £0691080338 ONV 5'ON NollIJIIN301 MVW MOA3AMf1S ONVI 1VN01SS3JOMd HAM W838 N081 03ddV0 V ONI38 1NIOd 01VV3 $ '133M1S H19K 30 Hinds j0 NI9H18ON 3HI HIM OZ N01133S ONS j0 83ldvno 1S3H1f10S 3HI 0 133J 00199 1S3 3H1 30WnO ISMN 3NII 1S03M33Hn O1N01nos 11 SM31NH 3HI 1V3I 303N ONW403 31313tld V'N'V) l 'ON OVOM 31V1S j0 AWHOW NI921VW A1831SV3HInOS 3Hl JOS 1 31S3 9NIAl 'NOiDNIHSVM 'ALN100 9NIN NI 'NV6183W 31L3WVllIM 11S3 b 30NV8 'HidON 3H1 JIOS 3 WnO 1S3MHlnOS 3H1HNMOJ 'OZ NOUO3S 30 1 On133A 8419Z HlnOS 3HI 0 NOU d iVH1 =a 130?3b'd 'ON-L6 'ON 1N3vusn 0V 3NII kNV(]NnO90 A M IV8303J j0Ia33jp L 10 SY NMONN OSIV) !DN3H1 01 133j 00'0£ N10NVW H18ON ONS ONO1V 1S3 „ C I L£O69 WnOS 30N3H1 H-LnOS j0 N10" H18ON OIVS 01 133j 84'ZZZ 1S3M .SO ,Z£ .00 WnOSS30HjqvC N3H1 '1333 OZ'811 1S3 „92 ,L£ .69 HinOS 30N3H1 133j lL'lL 1S3 ,9b !13369j.69 HinOS19MVyy 41NS99N1��31 33N3H1 :133j 4l'8L MOWN AlM31S3 ONS ONOIV 1S3M .90 .19 .l Z HllIOS 3H Ol 133J 89' l4Z 3NII HINONN01VS 9NOIV 1S3M .9 NI A1831S3HinOS :NOISW08lls 01VS j0 1.333 49'96Z HlnOS 3H1 30 3NIl£H18ON 3HI 01 133J 49'99Z NOISIA108ns ONS 30 3NII 1S3 3H1 9NOIV 1S3 "90 ,Z£ 'ONINN1038 30 103�U OW 00 H18ON 33N3H1 3HI j031a b1S3H1 ON 3H1 OON31svn031S3M1Ilnos ONSn 0 iHino 3NNIII SV3 3Hl Ol 133j 00'SI1 NIOWN H1NON QIVS 9NOIV LS3M .%, L£ .69 H18ON 30N3H1 3rinlOA N60308036 A3A8ns 308 ON0 38 V3NO NMOHS SV t,0691S 0 NOL 39Vd 'fill MOA mns ONVI IVN01SS3308d HIM MV838 N081 03ddV3 5N13811N1 dNO1VS01133a SI Him 41f10S j0 MOM H16ON 3H1 HAM OZ N01133S ONS j0 M31wno 1S3H1f11S 3Hl 10 L33j 00 S8 1S3 31 J0 3NI111S3M8 3H 30 N0133SM3J 3Hl j0 1333 OOZ 1S3M NI3H11V ONINMY400 ON31313Vd V N tl) l 'ON 0V08 31V1S j0 N DMVW Al831S3I gnOS 3H1 j0 AI831S3 ZIdIHSNMOlSOZ NOLL3S JO N31wno 1S3ri H1 O 33Hl jpS1tn0 1S3H1MON 3H1 30 83lWnO 1S3mHinoS 3H1 j0 1334 84'Z9Z H1fI0S 3H1 j0 N01ISV3 lb0N ON OVOM 31VIS j0 N108VIN Al831SV3HInOS 3H1 j0 A I83 S31 ONIAI N019NIHSVM OZ NOLL 3S o0 31wno SY3MH31lW10S13H1 j0 8318bno S3H1MON80Hl LZ 31Mbn0 1S3MHinOS 3H 30 133A 8'OL£ HlnOS 3Hl 30 133j 91'4L H80N 3HI j0 N01180d 1H1 :g 13021b'd Ol 1Vld ONS j0 bl H0nO8H1 61 SlOI j0 3NII 1S3M 3H1NN018tl 183HI1MONn3ji 3HI 0N3HI 1Vld OIVS j0 61 101 j0 3NII 1S3M 3H.L Ol 3NII H18ON OIVS 9NOItl 083 S3 33N3H3 1S3HInOS 3HI 30 318MO 1S3H18ON 3H1 30 8318YnO 1SV3Hinos 01VS Jp i33p Zl'89Z HinOS 3H1 30 3NII H18ON 3H1 Ol 3NII 1S3M ONS 9NOIV AI83H18ON 30N3H1 no 3H1 j0 8318vno 1S3H1NON 3HI j0 31wnO 1SV3HInOS OIVSM31-40JI H 1S3M130H1 30 1333 901 1S3 3H1 j0 3NII 1S3M 3H1 01 3NII HINON OIVS ONOIV AlM31S3 30N3H1 OZ 1S3HInOS 3HI 30 318MO 1SN3H180N 3H1 j0 8318vno OSV3Hin SS 3JO 831Nvn HI 30 i333 84'ZSZ HMOS 3H1 j0 3NII HldON 3H Ol 3NII 1S3 ONS ONOIV - 31svn?) 1SV3HinOS 3H 30 31wnO 1S3HMON 3HI 130S31Nbno 1S3MH1110S ONS j0 3NII 1S3 3H1 01 3NII H18ON QIVS ON 1V AIM31S3 33N3H1 30 Nmyn0 1S3H1NON 3H1 j0 831MVf10 1S3MHinOS1yS 3H1 J0 1 3j 8'OL£sv3HfIOS 3H1 30 3NII H18ON 3HI Ol N10MVW AI3S3Hinos ONS 9NOIV 0131SRHinOS 33N3H1 4 'ON OV08 31VIS ONS j0 0831S3 ONRI N01103S ONS 30 8318VnO 1S3Hinos 3H j0 8318vno S3H18ON 3H j0 831wno 1S3MH1 1VH1 j0 83N803 1S3MH.LnOS 3H1 j0 A131S3HMON 'Nf NON )08331SUHinos OIVS Mow 0 nsviW SV '133j 00'49 9NI38 1NIOd QIVS (Hinds kVMHOIH 0Ijl3Vd b"N'V) l 'ON OV08 31VIS .10 N198M A1831SMmOS 3Hl Ol A1Z131S3MH180N 33N3H1 j0 l 101 j0 3NII HinoS 3H1 01 1317VMVd 3NII V 9NOW L33j bS'OL AlM31S3M !iYld OlV1 !NI3n81 3H Ol 133A 00'99 'bl 101 ONS j0 3NII 1S3M 3H1 9NOlV�A183 .40 33NIOd ONV LZ S39Vd 'S1Vld 30 St 3Wf110A NI (13080038 '3033HSVM 1Vld 3HLO01 ONI08003V 'NOI1100V NOIA j0 1Vld 3H1 30 41 101 30 83N803 1S3MH180N 3H1 1V ONION3WW00 :SM011Oj 'NOIDNIHSVM 'A1NnO3 ONIN NI 'NV10183W 3113WV1I1M '1S3 $1 30NY8Sy'H18ON3lZOdIHSNM01 OZ N01133S 30 8318vno 1S3HinOS 3H1 30 8318Vno iS3H1MON 3H1 j0 N01180d lHl :b' 130�dvd (Auodwo0 eauo��- o�_ly'j�d SV) 132! WVR %1.313 (311S 83NNOO 'M'N NONJ : ,L l) kVMC1VO8 1lVdHSV NIOII NV8 d 313S %IN38 31J8 �� 88'9LZ - �13 Hl(311S 30 83Nd00 VS 21V3N) (lOS AVMH9IH OI31OVd 30 3NIId31N3O NI 3SVO 1NImnNON NI 3dld NI „Z/I-Z 30 d01 iM"-M 10 AVM IVH3a33 JO ul0 A8 a31dOOV SV 6Z61 30 Wf11Va IVOIld3A OI13aM IVNOIIVN SNOIlyAM-q =10 Soya - MLya -yam 83N800 V l'3 3HI 1V S1N3W(1NOW N103 3H1 N33M138 031NII 3H I J0 9NIM8 3H1 SDNUVM =10 Seye - WfLLya -wlmzk OH S,W cfm N-ld BdbOSC]NV-1 AdVNIWI-13W L :40 L-1 AgAuns ,k8V()Nnoe )IHclVU00d01 (]NV AUVC]NnoE3 v -jOvO NV-ld LSMEIS AEJV,INVS C]NV S31VM ALIVNIW1-1DUcl =1O Co Nd1d ='90b'NIVU(] VVUCIS CINV JNI(IVHJ JlWNIWI-19S d v =1O ZO A3HS H3A00 V =lO to :S1ggHS 01 X3GNI 8-08L9Z'1-O8L9Z'S-OSL9Z :Sja-IX LIB-uol OS=I :91DOS 90:60 6661/8z/l0:GI-U!1/a)Do 9M(I'Od-08L9\,.fit/NIWIl3dd\08L9\rOdd>iSaS\:d :al!j *8Oi3VdlNO3 3H1 30 U11181SNOdS38 3HI 38 OSIV IIVHS NOIIVIN3ymNON 01VS 30 1N3H33VId38 801 SV4803 31V18dO8ddV 3HI 'SNOl1V1f19M 3S3H1 01 1Nvns8ld '801OV81NOO 3HI 30 N01103NI(I 3Hl 1V ONV 1SOO 3H1 IV '80,UAans GNVI 03831SI03N V A8 (130V1d3N 38 IIVHS 03AO81S3O NO '03AOW38 '430V1dS10 S1N3nnNOW IIV 'NOIlomiSN0O 30 NO1131dW00 NOdn 090L--�0926 NOlONIHSVM 'VldVVjO 09OLt X08 '0'd 3'S 133US NOlONIHSVM L L l l 301330 kJANns ONVI onend S3021f1OS38 ivNn1VN 30 1N3W1aVd30 31VIS NOIDNIHSVM '06L 1-Z06 (90Z) iV 3NOHd3131 A8 301330 813H1 ON113V1NOO A8 80 'S3OwOS38 lv8niVN 30 1N3HlNVd3a 31VIS NOIDNIHSVM 3HI NONJ 03NIV180 38 ),VW S1N3rinNON 3AON38 01 S11NN3d NO3 SNOI1V01IddV '?IOA3ANns ONVI 03831SIOM V A8 03131dNOD 38 isnvq SNOI1VOIlddV 'OZl-MOVM 01 iNvns8nd 'AlIAli3V NOIlOf18iSNOO A8 0310333V 38 AVW 1VHl N011V1N3mnNOW A3A6ns 1IV 9NI3VId3N (INV 9NIAOW3N b03 S30mOSM 1V21f11VN 30 1N3YUVd30 31VLS N019NIHSVM 3HI NOW Sl1N213d ONINIVI80 803 3181SNOdS38 Allft3 38 IIVHS NOiOV81NOO --------------ISNOD ------- _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ HAM ON1033008d 01 8018d SW31808d IIV 3AIOS38 Ol 'ONI 'S833NION309NI118f1SN00 _ _ _ _ _ _ N3snVHOdV8 1lf1SN0O IIVHS 8010VH.LN09 3H1 '2dnopq ainOHS S1OII3NOO 31 _ _ _ _ _ 'NOIIVINVA Ol 103f enS 3aV ONV N0llVWi•103NI onend 0313R13ANn 3HI NOdn 03SV8 3NV SNVId _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ` 3S3H1 NO NMOHS SV S31illa 1 QIVS 30 SNOUVOOl 1SIX3 Si0ll3NO0 ION 80 b3H13HM A31213A ` - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / ),IIV9lSAHd Ol SONISSOn ),.Ullln M3N 30 SNOI1V301 1V S3111IIin ONIISIX3 3HI 30 IIV _ _ _ _ ONIIOHlOd N3Hl ONV 9999-*Zs,-008- l ® 31VOOl J,lllllfl ONIIIVO 3aniONl IIVHS SIHl - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 'NOIlOfl8iSNOO Ol 8018d N011VOOl 1VOU83A ONV IVINOZINOH 3Hl ONI,10Mns ONV S3111IIin ----------- - - - - 3H1 9NnOHlOd A8 ION 80 SNVId 3S3H1 NO NMOHS 83H13HM S31111111n 9NUSIX3 IIV 30 _ ---` -- H1d30 ONV 'NOISN3WI0 'NOI1V901 3H1 ONIM183A 803 3181SNOdS38 38 IIVHS a019Va1NO3 3H1 --------------- - - - -- __------------- - 1��S1S H18bE 'S :NOL1nVo �310N 1011 - - gR=� NOO JW1LLn ~ {�' Y71 __Try r / o It i / 4 I B fl / I / I Y I I I I i:q:qHS HDA00 L"M= 31380NOO a3SOdO8d IN3W3AVd (18VONViS 1NVWAH 38IJ ONIISIX3 331 ONIISIX3 (, 3AIVA d31VM ONIISIX3 -- M (Y NIVW831VM ONIISIX3 1NV60AH 3NII 1-Y dN38 -9* 03SOdONd b- ON38 .06 03SOdO8d A ONINOOle 'ONOO 03SOdO8d 331 03SOdO8d N 3AIVA N31VM 03SOdO8d NIVNN31VM 03SOdO8d — —0- 3NII N3M3S AHV11NVS ONIISIX3 O 3IOHNVN 83M3S k8VllNVS ONIISIX3 3NII N3M3S k8VilNVS 03SOdO Hd • inONV310 63M3S ANVIINVS 03SOdO8d 3IOHNVW N3M3S A2NVIINVS 03SOdO8d 0Otf sNnO1N0O ONIISIX3 -Z' Z SNOIIVA313 lOdS 03SOdO8d - 3NII N801S ONIISIX3 0 NISV8 HOW it 3dA1 ONIISIX3 13 NISV8 HOW 13dA1 9NI1SIX3 3dld 3N31AH13AlOd 031VOf moo 03SOdO8d NISV8 H01V0 II 3dA1 43SOdO8d m NISV8 HOW 13dA1 03SOdONd :aN@031 SSS9-bZb-008-1 �ia nog �ao��a �neo A14 KOT R A P,rt GUAal .••�.�,� f'TZ(�f'1;11';'�i 1) zJ _.__ .--- - KC 1696 .. TO 5}1ow ACC11R1Ti: MElASURE"' MTS FAS11MY0 k MAP IB TOR nix i of -+ F� SE 2.0.... Ili LOCATING Y'OM 21- P11RTY .AND 29 21••2"T,-S�IIl�?�A�. _ ._--_.__. __----__.._. _� .-- I 'iIiI31AP IS FOR 'PlIF PUJIPOSi, ON' (`--- ASS sI21G IN I�OCA7'II1G YC�Tit - - TO SHOW ACCURATE-MyMUiJRM}IT'I� 7HIS 4/60 IS.FQ,2 '1.H PU10 3E 0J ) ` cRTY A?jD TS 1'CT CUA.RN�'L��� I2iS - / S. �_c;,zs'r11�c, I11 L tC�.'rI11G ,�, i /n� �7; �t A �t �7 rir F, ,jtL�,, 9�� SCALE I 100 344 �r\ J---- 1!C1�l111 RATE L' 4alifiV VLIL a�.i+ :'. 1`I10rMi1 i AM-) It; NOT GU)'..__'fl_;_. - A e � I tZ ,5110Yr aCCU11 ,.1'L"-lEASU1�r ^+'T 2f _ - q ---_,ti y� y 33 - COUNI"Y.AS!"'t'SJO70 _ - --- N E U. y SSA,'S To/q_ Cole`*` . S . /3/3 / 4 >• o -�- 4� S r a, ti N 9 9 -S/- 38 H/ ,o �s MAP /QE•V/. \0 • ss,.,5- 229.66 1 a'Oq NB/:Ji+ N 4e��.o 0 r,_ n fie- 1 � •now. r� - •- I //� -•_ t y Y v r Doo6r osa� __ � ��• 9•�0 2f. 99•S so.s8R.4c-4oC 7({o.ot I i S �.\ 526,�� 4 /a3o•ss 9949 9 �e 79 /SS AG 40E. (�.) �° to _ zB.0 1002.44 S.08- .9w ; I v/ N ? a . e9s�o �� e 34B. 3G , a ep Ill N M h ��� �' l% yo T I o 51d�1 �: MR "' ro3o I P°Ro`o ro 2 ao ' B' TR. D-2 ° rr ° t. °Igro� ,m 7 w° 5 BA 4e. 9oE 2A5.02 y N° 0 c1 7.Q � i!� o 219.°3 n °LS 1� ._ o" C-) fk0' "1 , It I N .G p ! �, p C ' 3 'J d 7 • . / rr LOi- 3 - � \ �` `� N � °Otp.SGf i?98.35 �• (n 1 20 1 :.r�F o9 n• 41 A I' N tltrr o °°.. y I I N ^ 1L n ,v.4 9 ? �. TR. C- I 1` �. n ' 8 C�/^ Q In J v I s a (1 A\ o� o C C),p p y ,�` InrJee s�-n9w f5 n p �9y ? d�a sAre 9 lt9.9t '-' 12.91 a t I U C/ 0 �? �) v In\o , KCSP 1179064 R T--8©1445883 Ira I ; 8 ° 8702250329 ° .ecD A � vJ q U AR.tR•So Z, _ t v ^ ��c �3 �)• to '10 3 79. 39 p r , N +1 1N n C) O 27G.I(o O N ti O N co ,rr9� to d LOr 4 ri V� h R N N J9/M C POR._ �� LOT 2 p 11A O ti N ,\ It/ h.o �� I^ U 10} vp �\-� ? h 1 \I / S,U�SV V - n °15 v s' t of (c'bOf \, .0 ti POR. TR. �a W py 4o 0 o o to Ij J 3 v G�./B _ "_• 1 ' ^ 1 3 h oob lap o' I �' ' I ti' 115 , \ /3B.9960r) n J N I N z7 6 ao ^� 229.66 --_- /� K/ 37A - - \ � _ 3/0 �NRB g3.is2 L 9, �. Q 284 1 4 2L� b5 n.10 P132.04� 2n 247-19-2.2G t4 80 43 - I .l~ 524. 2G (P) a ` /jf,7L.t,ti'ns < o r^ 39.7 7 ;o.,s4 * S N � a n v o N 297.9d rc� 0 0 • o r/ w O COti O O N O PG to JO 0 "- n 1 ITV O, N CO F Z ��ot y. ,� �. lY� y► �s Zo°15 $vj w 0,0 FAKE NO. 6 '\� sr° �`� ('�, Ids �/� 5 `?,PIp i 0' �.ho, Z9Xg4 0 N y0 40 284 (D a' �� ra3.36 1486'43•f.Iy �� ,1•! r �+� y N ° 112 136.HB i4 7' 171 \J 1 V _ t1 \ t!� - hA.A` IJO'o5° p (D V, s ,, �� r t 7 6 4�4 V c0�! -^p N 1 7 ZZ o0g o 101 \ tv Q (` 4_ tr `� _5 e G 8 R '� i 1 ' °�° o G _ _____1 _ - ° : o ��1 a r16e•3)v-+9w 3?,.,I Q U A13 10 90 0 q -7tJ 0 \J R i. t ! I - e 9 • G 1(t °�0 Q I�r p0° m N 5 NB8 43-lGW w 9®�Q Ibb pti\ :0 LOT 4 t� 0 7 m 0 W N \o IB Q �"z R9q a 3 �' �� / `? �0 � fc3�A`'j., b� yh l8 Z�� h J N , \ 5.1 44 M Z4 2.4 p 5 08 to I ' k Z o04° a(0. 44�^, t\ I�' y0 a 3 ry .- N e`9 37 3G ul 24I.58 60 5ti' rt 30 .130(o.J 0 I r^ k9 0 hp 00 S ro I N vJ 9 1?J 10 Q1 182.9 tl O�(, I bl to N _ Q I� 00 1� �^ n N88 Qa-l6w F S. 2Sd /srL•%,A'Q%., SF �it y^0 ZSE �(©.20 2 O _i sB9. .JGE B� tl.(q 1 J" !tE t , 4-9! �� �� G3 �1 vL ¢ A. _ o .vC9 37 3aeu d / S I `A i . 0 7 4 \ J L.v. o °v a rp7• e` o \ r �� royoi^' 3.2 P� �' ,� �g� o0 5o� +�a , co' G r ,, 1 .Ls 38� 4f-Z8G-?�1 �' t.� p9 nj DIv a 19 9 5 /� o �L/� 9� N 1'��� tio- 6 4 h r �-r ss_w w 2s, eo /� 9?� �j( L) N J y o P F� 'T t� : ,1 / G-P 15' p0 n' r(�.A 9rr FsAlr ,,J Ao©900 MI _ �/�,� ^ 4JSUMEn Floors PLA/N pl 00 v 3 0 Ne9.lr.sai i ./ >j Z 4ASE0 ttA' AN ElEVAT/oiv 13� It A�. a rJ I o Ne9 51'46'W (9llo ti /YC.L•L.4• ZB4o/o I 2G P. /S%• /S F: N n 30, m� �? 139 I w7st`i/c.� n a� T I I tt.i! 99 2�13•0l OA'£ FOOT AB°r E THE 1 p\ 6 hp I Jt•3 �Z.B6 B7./d r L G W POIN T oP IV AD �0' 9i t188.43 Ic rJ `� sy vi h pV v�j flt,0'39-A9K1 - " [ f A ►-'----- + t 3�s 7- �C!�IN ti •,IN �)J L: ,1 y �J 'rlk'f; L-1 A tx a7cnol 3 i _ '' P 5 tj ' �� z fl 9r/ �� °N�' h N ^1: a0 I r 01�0 r ci P%PL �, ° 2 A tv NN ()p s7�� N' \a ti' �� J�� }_ t�l� 2 t 85d " OlI . ^ , h 20 ! 2 �'- J p10(o ,�' d� I tl �/ °pooy'�P� rD N I •, °i py �0 3 1 7 N 0 \ 9N �'�ry J- r �N h� a AO 'ZS �9A� ( �) 96�jp�• � 9 0' 1 i. 15 � 9 0 •� o o t; e 3 9 v s o I C10'n' tiS � Z (�C. O • I � I r O 7.7r • 0 f7 p 1. O� ( (Ob c a t+ 15r 1 zo Opp $a{f t3 _t' mod- ti s's o t!G t y'� h� • er 171 /' z+ o a o° ° \v v�' a secs /a5 ./ r4Z 1 0 0 Z h t 4 ,• o O I 36.3 B7• = m l! �toJ �+,t s� , 3� d„ (� id �S 24 Q y� 410.81 (r) 190 3 t 0•SG ' �GI t4 D 2 B /oo ir-ri, ./ •/ `V atBt &I e aa.et, $5.69 9r. ti100-41-5T�W 1 / �srF ��/7." 140.24 5©9 37 3r:E 30 /i 9i7•/s'o6 -2e' �C Ne9-3',-a9w to7,so /0o cal woe7289 1�� 7N L t9so�toolev �8? 37-50E- A n e�. ,,•+, v to7.At +7 Ryo4u p gOCrj/7// -aid No OIREGt VBVtIGUt HR ACCESS FR°M LOTS I,C (3 h � - / C 0 / O �{r 7L.lIM► E07. 7e �f'J ' , .... - - _ t18 9 D9� 49 rl S 348 Nell: Ne e,•.•t 'Icw=wler• Autaa F•e L.Fa I { • 1 300 c..._ 6. �tsm Sl -.. 1300.02 -a.�/ S � _ _ j32 - � -- \ �`- n 1 N,bg-j9-A w• (r.) it�.ts -- 3 4 8T H• _ - - - - - - - - _ S. - _ -- - - - -- - - 5 l ia�, ct, O 1 - - _- - /•- r ,/., /ilSn. an_.f•;•ir Ra /iin o_�'? 2 - J_o . .S" .Lr� G6Gi�c"'703 O- - Tar _. 6s' PRIMARY STA`T'E HWY NO 2 b CJC7. PS.H. NO I TO AUPURN ) C/L h }� t . (� tsar o303• �8 F�1• � � &•07 a '1 3 � a V /6V � /s. co r 3 G4G:s-.f/ o v �4s I ��T'-1,�� BDRY � h1\ �'J 1 1 0\ � t4.9 S.C9-4}•DIE. Goo A,o•�1•nw �-� N h p �t gHZ4 m t 1 v ° A 40 w -O7 op ` G✓'l7 Q7 �f N ulE7i,�n/1�S �Q So 4� ,via. a- _ q� td� cl 70 00 I 1 00 (0 04!5 - \� - - -- -- •l_,3.'''- - �t'l/;•.o:"� �/v 1 Z`i?.<t7 _ � `ro ,y�'F-39•�-c yr � v � 3 0 � O 5L57-O-7-fX�m 702.-)93 N� V \ " H ' N` 4 r � o 0 r, 0 eo Ib� P� O �. 1. 7o I I J c,NJ O y N.89 28 39'k. e00 \Q PG alti .✓ee-it �7w Iry;r per 4 9� H <'I r. a 3� go . fq - •p,,.(� ._ - v 0\ 1 80h' . a . 25/.73 N !9- �Z.37 £ ioo 14� � - I 39f I. \9 (3( o tK k, Q O ° <� M , q �I-- �� Z 97. 92 '•f • J I I .._. �--� .J[ b 3.3 e- °j __•__ sr �' �o r t 3 i sso.l. h. a x° V LoT J a d Q I 40 O l �� �^� `� KCSP 274023 6011050635 0 "' ° ,� A ' 1 e ° \ti �� + • A/ Pq - 3 2.37 ! _ '�0. 5r1 rL . PG �f - I r1JETL 4/V VI N 0. 0 /70 � o LOrQ 51, S s6i�3c'w z•z lo6P' S 6 j9f,� h �•*IeN Ie' NO. ES HT. � I i �°, L+� fir,• o � � /d 5�\ .v,?9° 3c • E .t''r \ tH Slt /Q I loy0b� o n / tnG fit; - - - - ZOO _ - _` ; 1w o� e l 3 vl At J - N f '� 4.4 I�/ ti z2 i fl 1 ti a eo ,to. �sMr. Q Lu 36,66 n6r� 3 G 3 z ry �,�` v s� c0 h N 1�1 5,331 �' t4 t, 0 n v Q V) u' '1h0 OF ��. ' 61 5 � ti � �o SQ�A,`� 1 i (��� � I�ID Nam_ 3 dd -3Z-3o E-/9�1� 16\ �` 30 30 / t 2 l lNc ? f 4 S9 7 9v 6.9 /. 13A. 5o (IV,.) A v�ItAs.7 a - 9t/.!L To CoR -�- i,jo2•A8 7hA.M19 - s r ��°���.� ..� �s:o ro s.�c. COX. -�. N E 2 4 NW . - o z.B9 9wEn,4Alv . w s t