The URL can be used to link to this page

18-102212CITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity June 22, 2018 ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLC Matt Reider 33400 8th Ave S Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Permit #18-102212-00 SM; GREENLINE WAREHOUSE "A'; 3120 S 344* St, Federal Way Dear Mr. Reider: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Economic Development This letter addresses your right-of-way modification request dated June 4, 2018 to revise the requirements for Weyerhaeuser Way South frontage improvements. Background The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan designates Weyerhaeuser Way South as a Minor Arterial, consisting of a 66-foot street with curb and gutter, 6-foot planter strips with street trees, 8-foot sidewalks, and street lights within a 100-foot right-of-way. Existing conditions vary along this approximately 1,335' long right-of-way. Existing right-of-way is as low as 66' wide to well over 100'. The existing pavement varies from about 55' wide to 84' wide, with curb and gutter on both sides. The west side of the road has 5' wide sidewalk only between the Loop Road and the roundabout, with no planter strip or streetlights. The east side of the road has 5' wide sidewalk and streetlights for almost the entire length of the frontage, and four foot wide planter strip only between the roundabout and the SR-18 right-of-way. A Right -of -Way Modification decision was issued on September 30, 2016 associated with a 314,424 square foot warehouse application on the single parcel located on the west side of Weyerhaeuser Way S. Frontage improvements for the full width of Weyerhaeuser Way S were required for the length of the lot. This decision was based on the Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre -Annexation Zoning Agreement (CZA) and the 1994 city code in place at the time the CZA was created. The warehouse application has since been revised to a "general commodity warehouse" (Warehouse A) with a gross floor area of 225,950 square feet. In addition, a boundary line adjustment was recorded on November 3, 2017 that divided the single parcel into two. A second "general commodities warehouse" (Warehouse B), with a size of 217,300 square feet, has been proposed for the second lot. \\CFWFILEI \Applications\CSDC\PROD\docs\save\ 151719_77906_18160608.DOC Staff has reviewed the applicable zoning and development standards and the CZA for this site. Full width frontage improvements and right-of-way dedication for the entire width of Weyerhaeuser Way S are required for any amount of building square footage exceeding 300,000 square feet. Since the proposed building is less than 300,000 square feet, the CZA states that only life -safety improvements are required for Warehouse A. Warehouse B would exceed that threshold, triggering full width frontage improvements. Modification Requests The applicant has requested the following modifications: Modification 1. Planter between sidewalk and face of curb to be planted with grass instead of street trees until required by future development. With the Warehouse A development, the applicant has proposed to build 8' wide sidewalk in its ultimate location along the west side of Weyerhaeuser Way S only. This improvement will run the length of the frontage on both Warehouses A and B, as shown on the Greenline Warehouse A Site Plan dated 03/12/2018 (Exhibit A). Full -width right-of-way dedication has also been proposed for both Warehouse A and B frontages as part of Warehouse A development. Other frontage improvements proposed to be completed with Warehouse A include: planter strip (grass only, no trees), relocating bus stops, adding bus shelters, providing a left turn lane for truck entrance, left -in, right -out driveway, pedestrian crosswalk, and a path through the managed forest buffer. All proposed improvements are considered either life -safety requirements or within the scope of the TIA that has been submitted for this development. This modification is approved, with the following conditions: 1. Street lighting is considered a life -safety issue, and must be constructed on the west side of Weyerhaeuser Way S. with Warehouse A, concurrent with sidewalk installation. 2. Current ADA standards must be met. 3. Sidewalk and planter strip on the east side of Weyerhaeuser Way S, street trees on both sides of the roadway, and road widening, may be deferred to a later date that shall be mutually agreed upon. Improvements must include sidewalk and planter strip built to current standards on the east side of Weyerhaeuser Way S., from the WSDOT right-of- way to the Loop Road. Existing street lighting may need to be relocated or replaced. 4. The right-of-way dedication shall insure that right-of-way width is no less than 100' for the entire frontage of both Warehouse A and Warehouse B. 5. The applicant shall provide a bond for the remainder of the full -width improvements. A date shall be mutually agreed upon by which time the improvement must be completed. The applicant shall submit an engineer's estimate for 120% of the cost of improvements, using prices reasonably expected based upon the agreed required completion date. \\CF WFILE I \Applications\CS DC\PROD\docs\save\ l 5 I719_77906_18160608. DOC Modification 2. Aside from the provided street improvements listed above, leave existing pavement and channelization intact to maximum extend feasible until required by future development. This modification request is denied. Pavement reconstruction and channelization are a condition of SEPA and will be determined separately from the concomitant agreement and this right-of- way modification, as applicable to this development. The right-of-way modification decision issued on September 30, 2016 is no longer applicable. The conditions of the new modification decision are valid for one year from the date of this letter. Should this project change significantly from the current site plan, or land use approval is not obtained within one year, this right-of-way modification shall become void and a new request for modification must be submitted. If you have any questions, please contact Ann Dower at 253-835-2732 or at ann.dower ci offederalwa .com. Sincerely, :Valsh, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director EJW/AD: av Enclosure: Exhibit A cc: Marwan Salloum, P.E. Public Works Director Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Cole Elliott, P.E.; Development Services Manager Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Project File/ad Day File \\CFW FILE I\Applications\CSDC\PROD\docs\save\ 151719_77906_18160608. DOC 12 t � L ' F (CAT.III) `= X> K TYP CAL 8.5x18' PARKING AOO 29o' Dap STowLE LEFT rjRNJ OFSIIJI TO 3E OAcrowimm BYE TRAFFIC ENGINEER. CROSSYIC TO BE REI�OCATEO to NORM 310E OF 11AT F6AY BV TRAF.-IC ENGINEER. NEV CROSSING LOCATION BY TRAFFIC ENGWEEP•. N0 TRUCK ENOMNCE n SCALE_1-- 80' m CONTOU R INTERVAL -Z DATUM: N.G.V.D. 29 fl SFIEET (NOEX- TATER- CIVIL PLANS 4 Nil I Sf-Ot SfiE PLAN $0TH AV6dIJE S. -WOo AO-- 2 E%-01 TOFOGRAPHIc SURVEY . r �01 LEGEND 1 LLOPF-OFC 1+/'N ONION i 50-01 PR611Mn FT> CP LR+IOYtG ��`� LA-01 PRELIMINARY UWOSCAPE PL EX Bus SfOF S 1 02 LANDSCAPE DETAILS g NOTES . 7 GR-Ot CLEP NG d GRADING PL?N 0 B OR- 2 STE & ROAD CROSS SECTIONS tO OT-07 17NJCR 40voa R STUDY 1I or-02 TRUCK AIOYEIEO'T STUDY A g 12 TR-01 TRUVVEGErATION RETENTION PUN ARCHITECTURAL PLANS .l eF.rRm,10 .. AIM DESIGN BRIEF. EX1ETa0R ELE/A10NS Y PMP'CrN=- t .Al I BUILDING SZt ATIONS PROJECT STATISTICS: 51f1( —16.AC. ,,,RAL AREAS. NON-EXDAW - 32.567 S.F- (1-M AC) OPEN SPACE: 0 SF. (0 AC) }LEA OF m-91E PUBuc PURPOSE 1ANOS = 0 S.F. NET SOE AREA - 597.W SF. (13.72 AC) SiTE DATA: y 77DMMU: CP-I 00NSIRIR.RION: UNUNREO USE 14AAEYOUSE MO OFFICE OETAND FILL AREA = 9949 EF. PARItNC: 255 CAR STALLS (7 ADA ACCESSIBLE). 30 TRAILERS OTNLFR STALLS '.2'K65' 255 SFAFWARD-&5'x16 (MIN) ASLE NIDTN: 26' (rm) FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS' F�pYpE e1PA0Y01F1�+ FO11 R1E BiILom A PR612CT COW9 10 BE PxpO4MI40K '.kER�W�O' 'JOM ANTE JRDU07 SF n. mp,, 445 SET ISCE aDE C+r1LIO, -WAY fi� I OaSE ,NPROYOR)O5. sMQWJ..E— T31 ctM� 'NAY c�+mvs. sic gly�ppYlOg1, P); ifEO AP TOM MEMUCIT j,}TOO d1N AyE S aBL7 IMPERML HIGHWAY, SUITE H Z BOB'NES', CA 902n: B39-5113 13 38003 [a$sj -B NE. Ma •rHYE KUNL:UN BILL SRIEIS / JENMFER .MARRIOTT 33400 9H AVE S 15050 VILLE. REEK D YE NAY. WA 9a003 (AS) 561-7550 (253) am-6113 1R.rw+twrmeN-7ra__+EEa JE EFF SCHRAMM 1105 AMCELT AYE 8 16 6TH ST 5 KIL25) 25,0 9B0]3 GIC011A tTA 9BA02 (•25) 0-0561 (1psT NCHR..SIs PUX _ KATHY '009 25DS ]I10 A E. WTEE WATnE NA 9612' . ,2,6) rm-700, - 3 o L z-'t [L U Muj 5 W � Q Ifl H Wz U S< Z: Z Lu Q W LL ��•R� V ST-01 1 of 11 ;.—. ":k CITY OF Federal Way PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREET MODIFICATION REQUEST / ACTION Project Name Greenline Building A Right -of -Way Modification Reconsideration Permit # 18-102212-SM; 16-102947-UP Location Weyerhauser Way S Request Federal Way Campus LLC is requesting to divide the full frontage improvements required by the 9/30/16 Right -of -Way Modification decision into two phases, some with Warehouse A and some with Warehouse B. Staff Analysis Weyerhaeuser Way S is classified as a Type G Minor Arterial by the Comprehensive Plan. A spreadsheet is attached showing the existing and required improvements, as well as the approach proposed by this request. The proposed phasing does not follow current property lines. As proposed, most of the improvements would occur with Warehouse B, including some improvements that are fronting on, and across the street from, Warehouse A. The new modification request itemizes seven improvements that will be completed with Warehouse A. Item 1, right-of-way dedication, covers the full improvement requirement on both sides of the street and along the entire frontage of both Warehouses A and B. Items 2 through 7 fall within Section 14.2 of the Concomitant Agreement which states that "life safety issues" will be paid for by Weyerhaeuser at time of development, including driveway and intersection improvements, left turn lanes into new development, pedestrian corridors along public road, and paving of shoulders for bicycle lanes. These improvements occur along the full frontage of both Warehouses A and B, but they are not proposed on the east side of Weyerhaeuser Way S as required in the previously approved right-of-way modification. The plan shows improvements on the east side of Weyerhaeuser Way S ending short of the Loop Road, and extending to the south end of the roundabout. Taking into consideration the existing public right-of-way width and private ownership in the area, it appears these improvements could be extended as far north as the Loop Road and as far south as SR 167. South of the roundabout, the adjacent property is not owned by Federal Way Campus LLC, but there appears to be adequate right-of-way width to construct the improvements. The proposal does not anticipate full pavement reconstruction, which has been discussed with the applicant but was not included in the 9/30/16 right-of-way modification. It will be included in the land use conditions of approval. Staff believes this should be included in this right-of-way modification. Requirements / Conditions of Approval Staff discussion is scheduled for Monday, June 18 to determine requirements and conditions. Staff Recommendation Development Services Reviewer Development Services Manager Traffic Division Reviewer Traffic Division Manager Deputy Director Initial Date Approve Deny ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Director Decision ❑ ❑ May 23, 2018 Revised June 4, 2018 Mr. Marwan Salloum, P.E. Public Works Director City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue S Federal Way WA 98003-6325 � Job No.1886-001-016-015 RE: Greenline Building A File #16-102947-00-UP & 16-102948-SE Revised Request to Modify and Waive Frontage Improvements Dear Mr. Salloum: RESUBMi I I ED JUN D 4 2018 On August 12, 2016 ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC made a Right -of -Way Modification Request on behalf of Chill Build Seattle, LLC who was the applicant for the Preferred Freezer project. At that time, Chill Build Seattle was seeking to develop a Cold Storage Warehouse with a gross floor area of approximately 314,424 square feet. This amount of building exceeded the 300,000 square foot frontage improvement exemption established by the Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre -Annexation Zoning Agreement (CZA), section 14.2. As a result, Chill Build Seattle was required to make full frontage improvements along Weyerhaeuser Way South. On December 13, 2016 Chill Build Seattle, LLC withdrew from pursuing development of the Preferred Freezer Cold Storage Warehouse and transferred their application to Federal Way Campus, LLC. Since then, Federal Way Campus has modified their application to develop Greenline Building A, a general commodity warehouse with a gross floor area of approximately 225,950 square feet. Revisions to their site plan include the following street frontage improvements: 1. Dedication of additional right-of-way; 2. Remove existing concrete walkway and install 8-foot wide ADA compliant sidewalk along frontage of Weyerhaeuser Way South leaving room for 6- foot wide planter (South of Loop Road Intersection to SR-18 westbound on - ramp signal); 3. Relocate bus stops and add shelters as noted on site plan; 4. Provide deep storage, left turn lane and channelization to Weyerhaeuser Way South for truck entrance; 5. Provide precast dual faced mountable curb to control truck exits to right turn out only; 6. Relocate pedestrian crossing location with pedestrian refuge; and 7. Provide pedestrian path through the managed forest buffer to provide access from Building A to new sidewalk. 33400 Bth Ave S Ste 205 ivil Engineering Land Planning Tel (253) B38 6113 Everett (425) 297 9900 T30 Federal Way WA 98003 Fax (253) 838 7104 Toll Free (800) 345 5694and Surveying Landscape Architecture www esmcivil com Laser Scanning GIS Mr. Marwan Salloum, P.E. 1 June 4, 2018 Page 2 On behalf of Federal Way Campus, LLC, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC is submitting this new Right -of -Way Modification Request with a revised site plan. With this letter we are requesting a modification to the following City standards: Modification #1 - Planter between sidewalk and face of curb to be planted with grass instead of street trees until required by future development; and Modification #2 - Aside from the provided street improvements listed above, leave existing pavement and channelization intact to maximum extent feasible until required by future development. Modification #1 Federal Way Campus, LLC is providing the required 3-foot utility strip and 8' of ADA compliant sidewalk from the south entrance to Loop Road, along Weyerhaeuser Way South terminating at the SR-18 westbound on -ramp signal. As a result, the existing curb shall remain intact. Modification #1 is requesting the remaining strip of land between the new sidewalk and existing curb (6-foot planter strip) is planted with grass until future development requires full street improvements and street trees. This request is supported by the Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre -Annexation Zoning Agreement (CZA), section 14.2. Modification #2 The second modification request is to waive additional right-of-way improvements until the approval of future development (Greenline Building B) which exceeds the 300,000 square foot development threshold as stated in the Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre - Annexation Zoning Agreement (CZA), section 14.2. These additional full width right-of-way improvements include 66-foot street with curb and gutter, 6-foot planter strips with street trees, 8-foot sidewalks, and street lights within a 100- foot right-of-way. In other terms, Federal Way Campus, LLC is requesting that future development (Greenline Building B) bears the responsibility of full width right-of-way improvements along Weyerhaeuser Way South. Thank you for your time and review of this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any comments, questions, or concerns during your review. Sincerely, L W NGINEER TING ES, LLC 4 A MATT REIDER Planner Enc: As Noted CC: Tom Messmer Jack McCullough, McCullough Hill Leary PS Ilesm8leng6esm-jobs1188610011016-00151documentlletter-008.dou Weyerhauser Way Minor Arterial Cross - Section "G" Existing Improvements Required by Comp Plan Required per 9/30/16 ROW mod 5/23/18 mod request Warehouse A 5/23/18 mod request Warehouse 8 Right -of -Way varies, 66' -100'+ 100' 100' 100' n/a Street Width varies, 53'--66' 66' 66' widen as needed to 66' Pavement Depth* 0.33CL A/0.17CL E/0.17CSTC 0.67 HMA/.50CSTC or .30 HMA/.85ATB not addressed curb & gutter both sides both sides both sides west side east side planter strip none 6' - both sides 6' both sides west side east side street trees none both sides both sides both sides sidewalk 5'most of east side, part ofwest 8'- both sides 8' both sides 8' west side 8' east side street lights east side, partial west side both sides both sides both sides utility strip 3' both sides 3' - both sides 3' both sides 3' provided, both sides *Pavement depth requirements resulting from truck traffic have not been established. Full pavement reconstruction is required as a condition of land use approval. IQ 71 3 v E 0 n 0 c 15 to O -O m m' m N •J NJ N O 0 0 N 0 0 a N O O N •� c N .c o Aw W D 40� 0 -q lip, tw i -} w w a O - N - - - ale — cr CL CD CD w w L �I �D N a 3I a a to 7 C. 7 CD 0 3� a� o a a r #w w ID w 0 W W 1 I 'w O � Q w N 61 N (—�—L-+ fw w V ' M 3 C. 31 C. C1 3 f1 fD C. r* O O A PORTION OF SECTION 21, T.21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. - .e,,,„D Ox - �(LA[•b) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TELEPHONE EASEMENT •�. ' _ ' •�) r t '_ r f. 10.0 PROPOSE, _ f A_ - I IR11G[[E POND v• 1 I �•' •I '�` I11Y EfSENEti1 1 r P AQ�Y ��UT�' mar•- _ � — I 100' EXISTING��,a s r _ _ —. j - t y,• r I WATER EASEMENT . I 1 -AC61I DU I I (I I a7 f[TP% R.ty 1 1 ((CAT. M)/ \ ^ R 1S f' III .:I I 1I .I I3If 1 I I 20.0' EXISTING eINGRESS A . ! J• `'- 2i-O STORM DRAINAGE EASE)ENr ~ - I EGRESS ASEMENT I! SEE DETAIL THIS , 11.e'.~, •. ` , '' \ \ti�.� ;-. � �'' . `•.. FOeNr1JTUZ�i SHEETTCIMsos. I our \ ` IN ^ D�VF opivj-rj\1T 5.0- CONCRETE SOEWA.K 1•I i I 7 r�, 225,950 SF B5 . ([n7 p 510sM WAV& .r.� 1 STORY = 45' HIGH MAX. 1B.G' (rnS e k ` EASEMENT / FF VARIES f j' _ •lwErunD Es - n = 402.33 - 404.04 50' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (M)' \\ �; ~ (CAT-90 WETLAND ED INDOOR RECYCLNG (IYP) ,` \\ ` • rIETLAtY EC (CAT IR) WERAND EE '3a7 ! 1 \ •� �„�� (CAr.np >, (car IN) N. �y ` f, ■t1L111P DP �� --_---;-�_ �' _�� 5r +-- . _ -_` { _. . _. yJ•• \ {CAL lO • \ ",� �� •�Y 30.0' TDOSTING Rw iy 1�,y' •! WNW) ' Z ^ .� - \EASEMENT '� .�ti�,,y�\ �� `1T• Srl WB `� "� '-Fv I 1 I f —I�a, — — 1 T o WERAND I]'1 500' !!! (CAT.III) (CCATrwil) WTIT�RED Da r l� 12A" I r' ~ C's 1 ( 30.0' ........ ..... �9 (GV. Ni �. (G � 1 ! IIt 41i I TUR IO LEFT N SIGN ••-••••••' � •• ' _ I Y� •.�� 1 + 1 - FOREST .......... •"'� ' , , , r' ` BUS STOP TO BE Ia0^,DCATEO ,PELWAT y 1 l'Ip f �liA YO $*M M OF -S ♦ Ifs .�.. ,—,�+- l RIT Aa ,1-_ IFTL11 r_ - T 1" •t� w C11N✓AE3i wAv 5.— _ -a a OR ARiFALY \\ / REU1tK1Eo BUs Sr10` '. I � 1 ti I ,:. •'c+ :�_ a I � : � - SUIT r • PRECAST OUAL FACED MOUNTABLE CURB NEW CROSSING LOCATION BY ADD 240' DEEP STORAGE, LEFT TURN TRAFFIC ENGINEER. LANE AND CHANNEUZAVON FINAL EX. NO LEFT TURN SIGN DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. CROSSING TO BE RELOCATED •I TO NORTH SIDE OF ORNE'HAY BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. TYPICAL 8.5'xi S' PARKING SCALE: 1-=z0' SIGN, NO TRUCK ENTRANCE Vicinity Map If SCALE: 1-= SO n ae CONTOUR INTERVAL=Z tm DATUM: N.G.V.D. 29 v SHEET INDEX- ° MrER- CIVIL PLANS •�xlswl .:aoTF+ AvSinA)E S. Sf-Ot SITE PLAN ao.t o1 may— z Ex-01 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY '. 3 LG-01 LEGEND OuIGTST 4 SO-Ot PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE, GRADING XwD �- E%. VA5 LA-01 PRELRRRARY WI050 PINI 5 LA-02 L.1.IDSCAPE 7EIAx5 & NOTES O' T CR-01 CLEARING & GRADING PLAN VIED T]1 8 GR-02 SITE &ROAD CROSS SECTIONS 10 N-01 TRUCK MOVEMENT STUDY 11 DT-02 TRUCK MOVEMENT STUDY 12 TR-01 TREE/VEGETATION RETENTION PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLANS A1.0 DESIGN BRIEF. EXTERIOR EIEVATONS & PERSPECTIVES Al 1 BUILDING ELEVARONS i� PROJECT STATISTICS: sTE T 17 CRITICAL AREAS NON-0KEMPr = 62.557 &F. (1A4 A0.) OPEN SPACE 0 SF (0 AC,) AREA OF ON -SITE PUBLIC PURPOSE LANDS = 0 S.F. NET SOE AREA - 51 SF, (7312 AC,) ==; SITE DATA.- ,�; \N=la PIN1- 460-0005 ZONING: CP-I CON5TRUCTON: UNUMITED USE WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE WERAND FILL AREA = 9.949 SF. fS11lV PARKING: 255 CPR STALLS (7 ADA ACCESSIBLE), 30 TRAILERS TRAILER STALLS: 12'X55' PARKING STALLS: 255 STANDARD=8.5'X18' (MIN) AISLE WIDTH: 26' (TYP) FRONTAGE IMP ROVEMENT& IgWM6 GE SpRMIEUE.YRs PW THE WWM A MDUET ARE 11) 9E OCFLTIREA UNIX, %gm N-E. AS NEW 0LM'ELOP PlIp LtDEEDS;'Jr 0 SF FX SWT'ATN PIS OF THE WEYCIOIAQ> GOWPAW COKC0lNTAN PRE-ANIILEATMR :OWAV AOHEEMENT. DMILD AUWBT 23. 1994. 11LIS PR061= HAS SET 4VX ADEQUATE MO"r-OF-WAY TO .CCOALMODATC 14EW !YPAOWVDR5. ��JKCT eaNTACTS: -_ -_- _6y ioiawmis �CAMMC. LLC ;JAIµ B4TENoMaK, vE LFED +P ROM s�SMR 33400 am AK L 66+7 1MPEXIIAL WdNWAY. UM H OQW?E'. CA 0742 FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003 (253) 838-6113 wIl1AlID "..e�NSULiAHF {� TERS AJSAEA A5T,0pA11sTi 'i11[NE IOIJKI 1T1 Do.L SIIaFLS ' IEMNV[R MAN IOIT }SiOO Sim AYE 5 500 BEAR .",R£QG I, NE FZOS ROODWAAE. rA'P811T% iI)tr E7tFaA<.WAY. VIA 06001 (+23) 85T-7553 (253) 838-6113 u .�A'aIilY .sFr SCIF41MM tA200 AYE R101KIfP10, YAi 96M .0 ff �1 TIM2 (42) I50-0561 ,'Ac (ptF 9aCHRECTS PL-C M111Y CRAFT 2505 3R0 AVM SUITE #324 SEATTLE. WA 98121 (206) 720-7001 OF SECTION 21, T-21 N.. R. 4 E., W.M. 11 n SCALE: 1"= 50' w n 0 - IN CONTOUR INTERVAL =Z DATUM: N.G.V_D. 29 it � :1 •! rI`/f�;1`'�'' �` �_`��'" s� ��r - �_ ` - -- ..� .� f �''�-'Q�o^+��;voe�..I °�e�";:<;�N?°;q� ` �• � • _ .�, • r � l I- _ � � Y _ -: r� - '�' �. �""� �� --•�.-.." �_- r � - :�j. �,°ra; at�i: � �f ` arga,.'�_ �{ •'!F _ �' ` � r �r � %��• _.. . rF:. .�. k.� .~�.�.� -- =.-- -- Sys: li `�d��•I�`e�• r T� � -+� •��'. - --��'le��l'�� . 10ff E DiW Fi1CIR ( } =°" I I ' �> I �_ � r� �.`••�J ram• r,� . ter;/ /' %� !//'� , 'E.•I j �'`_��`� �, - - -- - — w -- — - - - -- -- ��— zoo• ExlmNc itl r •' C ,� . 1 � - - _ - -•• . � f�`1 --- � Ii• '_ Y � iJ~ ~ � INGRESS EGRESS •� .{ � I • � !` 't i'� � / �� `-..t '•r ;:: � I I 'i. Ili�l�ll- I';.-j'` I •I F If � }. -� / 111 ' 214,050 SF 1 STORY = ; 44' HIGH r /- -si' ' •1:• ,� 30TH AV@Yfl S. - � � � � r• /j �� ! / -1 � b—� -i � ��- `�,�, _ '' � � I � f � � :ic • l; i• ,�- (Pueuc Avw Wiq ..- t-,q-• - • / r i r --- .:�' �� .., I I �.-raFF-snE �/vr OEnlranow {, '. 4 • _ t ✓r j L� 10%0' l SECTION G PER SHEET M-01 x .. ■ err — !' - 'y` _ i� WA 1 HOUSE `A' I • ` , � ' -r Tel_ ,_ • � � • f . � _ � (uniD-z sEP.aFzaTE �.4 SUBMITTAL) Ex eus SOP 'NETWNO ED '! St;rw SA +ECTVW Lc -� �'•'` t - ` �� y��p0 T- jr� ' I TREE SPECIES TO BE PER CITY ~ @--'+ 1• _ l DETERAIINEO FED ---. �• •i.. +i-t, 11. �- --`�.Y=-- 1 �_ 5 •� ' f •� r T 1 OF ERAL'NAY. (TYP) TTann.c Sn*s• �'•� I _ • �� .. f f -n` i�-. _ E [ Ima I� � � - - ( � r�F'• ��• . .�' 1l' � � N n TIAND (C oR' 2 � S v �.• r ' l• _ - - i = • •, ..;. y µ� y�`\ {. ,. - (car. II1) _ ,,,,,:.yyy�""� I.IM1 rtit _ � 1 _- � � - �y _ _- ,. \, ✓--�'�.. I / � ` , jOFF-SITE R/T•I OEOIGION ' ,:-:`.�+.{��•T.��`+s=-� R kEflagO EB �' • 'r•` C,,' _ .. r.. yp�� rI {/ � •+I ��' �! gipr Iz.e' a `L' f Exlsnnc wbi 'NITH 47tTL7N10 ADA RAMP .� • ��`--- � •-`s•" � ' , � r..,. - � .�. � I'('r, T �i�. .� � �. - 1 z ac 1varElt MINN �aaosnu[kT? wucw rnu .wEla - ro6Ta aAWAY •:.....�.�-ter_ ---- �rt :�pFF_9TCli.M-��_a_Clc�10111$ � 44 � � 'ti um -Or now SLSCN C •,y!. ` ��1 - _ _� - - .� _ ) _ & --• _.�"I..-'j� sue• la .- -i---- "�A\� - � RELaIATE0 BUS STOP 3 # +00 I:A DEER LfjT 0/R!r 0EWN + ` - ADD SHELTER TREE SPECIES S0 A is BE DkTi1h.L'.Ea a, 4�R1C 111 9 • DETERMINED PER CITY OF FEDERAL VYAY, (ttP) ! SING CROSSING TO BE RELOCATED •' IM-ET..NO LFT TURN SIGN N- F1COEuGINEERCAT10N BY 3 TO NORTH S10E OF DRIVEIVAY it BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. f ' J m 5 Z Q 0 5 n. U — w C7 } Q m z 3 O W� Q Z w J 0 Z Lu LL W LLI r� V CITY OF Federal Way DATE: 4/26/ 18 TO: Stacey Welsh FROM: Ann Dower SUBJECT: GREENLINE WAREHOUSE "A" - (16-102947-00-UP) 3120 S 344TH ST ; Fifth Review MEMORANDUM Public Works Department The plans and documents submitted on March 13, 2018 have been reviewed. When preparing conditions of approval, please include the following conditions: 1. The current approved Right -of -Way Modification includes widening of Weyerhaeuser Way S. As a part of building permit approval, water quality treatment shall be provided for all new pollution - generating surfaces within the public right-of-way. Detention shall also be provided as required in the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 2. The applicant has discussed but not committed to any particular Best Management Practices (BMP's) required by the KCSWDM. The applicant shall incorporate BMP's into the building permit plan set as outlined in the KCSWDM. 3. The applicant states that this project drains to an offsite wetland (closed depression), Parcel #2121049014, therefore KCSWDM Chapter 3.3.5 through 3.3.7 applies. If the amount of impervious surface area proposed by the project is greater than or equal to 10% of the 100-year water surface area of the closed depression, then a point of compliance analysis must be done to verify that the water surface levels are not increasing for the return frequencies at which flooding occurs, up to and including the 100-year frequency. The applicant has not provided a comparison of the proposed impervious surface area to the surface area of the closed depression, nor have they provided a minor floodplain analysis to establish an assumed base flood elevation for the closed depression. Conservation Flow Control (Level 2) must therefore be considered a minimum standard, and the applicant will be required to provide additional flow control if the site's impervious area meets or exceeds the 10% threshold, or a flooding problem will be created or exacerbated. The applicant shall provide necessary documentation and mitigation prior to building permit issuance. ,k Prior to building permit approval, WSDOT approval of the project's impacts on storm drainage conveyance within WSDOT right-of-way shall be provided. f I i CITY OF Federal February 15, 2017 Mr. Tom Messmer Vice President of Special Projects Industrial Realty Group, LLC 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Re: S 324th Street Extension — Federal Way, WA Dear Mr. Messmer: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor At our meeting today, we discussed how the S 324th Street extension project and the connection to 32nd Ave S and S 323rd Street could be modified to accommodate DaVita's proposed development consistent with their goal of having no streets between their existing and proposed buildings. As discussed, it appears to be in our mutual interest to have DaVita expand within the City. At the same time, it is also important for the City to maintain adequate transportation mobility, inclusive of vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian, to support existing and planned development consistent with our Comprehensive Plan. As such, although it reduces connectivity between 32nd Avenue and the S 324th Street extension, the City is supportive of the proposal to extend S 324th Street eastward directly to Weyerhaeuser Way S instead of terminating the extension at the intersection of S 323rd Street and 32nd Avenue S in order to meet DaVita's site plan goal, provided the parcel owner to the South that the revised alignment would impact is also supportive of this concept. We believe that this modification is functionally consistent with the alignment's current design. This does complicate the City's ability to maintain connectivity between existing and planned segments of the BPA Trail across I-5, and we therefore will need to jointly pursue alternatives to provide non -motorized connectivity between the I-5 / S 324`h Street interchange and the BPA corridor east of I-5. This may involve a trail connection through the DaVita property between S 324th Street and 32nd Avenue S. kAcorrespondence\2017\davita realignment. docx Mr. Tom Messmer S 324° Street Extension February 15, 2017 Page 2 Many other design elements remain to be defined, and we are committed to working with you and DaVita to develop an alternative that maximizes functionality for all parties involved. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (253) 835-2710. Marwan Salloum, P.E. Public Works Director MS:RP/mt cc: Jim Ferrell, Mayor Brian Davis, Community Development Director Tim Johnson, Economic Development Director Mark Orthmann, Acting City Attorney EJ Walsh, Deputy Public Works Director Stacey Welsh, Acting Current Planning Manager Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Project File (#16-103782-00-PC) Day File k:\correspondence\2017\davita realignment.doex 2/21/2017 King County Parcel Viewer by: Address Searchj Print - n rUO2� �, {� -emincle L-) r_'' _ — UNKN p3 Y Nr!!5 pi 3- q 40 :7.. inial.81vid — — ar. S 328th PI — -- Ln k: 7 f Jf"� J 5l �-Y V'✓1 J C� (i�i CGr'Ti V \/1 And Intersection Zoom to Advan S 32oth StL—L—L- 01 SC http://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/parcelviewer2/ 1/2 .CONSULTING ENGINEERS LI_c March 6, 2018 Job No.1886-001-016 RESUBMITTED Pyramis Global Advisors MAR 13 2018 53 State Street CFrY OF FEDERAL WAY Boston, MA 02109 OOMMUNrYDEVELOPMENT RE: East Campus 3 Office Building 33940 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA 98001 To Whom It May Concern: At the request of the City of Federal Way, we are writing to notify you that the driveway access to the above -referenced office building will be changing from a "No Left Turn Between 4-6pm" to a °No Left Turn" condition in the near future. The time allowance for left -turn movements is being removed as a result of road improvements to Weyerhaeuser Way S that will include the installation of a physical barrier, preventing this movement Since this driveway is already signed to prevent left -turn movements (see below), and has no time allowance noted on the signage, it is unlikely that this change will have any physical affect Left turn movements will still be allowed from the northernmost driveway serving this office park, and left turns can still be accommodated by turning right out of the driveway and making a U4um at the roundabout located approximately 800' to the north. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (800) 345-5694 or you can contact Sarady Long at the City of Federal Way at (253) 835-2743. Sincerely, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC ERIC G. LaBRIE, A.I.C.P. President Enclosures CC: Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way Ilesm8lengrlesm-Iobs1188610011016-00151documentlletter-006.docx ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 Sth Ave S, Ste 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Everett, WA 98208 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture 253.838.6113tell 425.297.9900tel 30 Laser Scanning GIS 800.345.5694 tall free 800.345.5694 toll free 253.838.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax www.esmcivil.com City of Federal Way Wetland Inventory Field Form Wetland Number',?(— y ?71 1 /4 Sect/Twn/Rng �29 2 f` a / , Location (address/crnss-streets) P er- G� S. /��"�• f' Team Members Date Feld Check: Base Map #: ly Windshield Acces ite Acces Site Not Accessed FIELD DATA Cnwardin Class Dominant SIM % total W L $ t4 / r4j S au- R V.22. 6TG Notable Wildlife Features Snags:#'s z 6" __ z 12" Z 24" Heights: Iry! • Y N; width flow: Y IV / Outlet�res nt: Y N; width _ None Obs None Observe ater Sources (Y/N) stream culvert: (diam) sheet flow floodplain Human Disturbances: /70 Buffer Conditions: d /Ja. ve -Ctl 0J. OFFICE DATA i NRCS Soil Unit: �l�`�'"`'� WL Rating Approximate Size: r— 500 tos 2,500 s .ft Z 1 acres 2 acre 00 sf, s '/z acre Z 2 acre, S 5 acre z 2 acre, 5 1 ac Z 5 acre COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS flow: Y N seeps f City of Federal Way Wetland Inventory Field Form Wetland Number�p/ 2 /—C' 7-) 73 1 /4 Sect[Twn/Rng Location (addr$Waoss-streets) t/�`ff f- �' , '5- q ( P I Team Members Date Feld Check: �1 'f1�F Base Map #: Windshield Access/ a Acces ite Not Accessed FIELD DATA Notable Wildlife Features Snags:#'s 26" '� z 12" Z24" Heights: 36 !n!e resent: Y N; width flow: Y N / Out/etpresent: Y N; width flow: Y N None Observed one Observe Water Sources (Y/N)� stream culvert: (diam) ----sfieet flow floodplain seeps Human Disturbances: ,,� Buffer Conditions: e�r'0'7v / 1�9 -, �s 2J OFFICE DATA NRCS Soil Unit: WL Rating Approximate Size: 500 sq. �. 5Q0 sf; s t/2 acre z'/2 acre, s 1 acre COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS 14J(zearS 45 z 1 acre, s 2 acre >_ 2 acre, s 5 acre Z5 acre Cn O CA T O O c� co 0 O 0) C >N to co aD 0) LL G C m JJ Cl) (T Cn [ff >_ cu O �j O O Nm m l6 E O 0) N O J O _lz3 O) m O CO L F ❑ m O L '_ -0 NCL yJ o O m o 0 0 _ < o 0) N E o N J cisa O ` L O J E V Cl)O Z ld > O O= -0C m D CD Y6co m O m m d O V r a� = w � u is o co co 3 m m }: c c -.-E o m N m m m dF 3 0 , E m= m m Q m n m CDc -0 n 3 0 m $ c m N - c'3 m > e m mo <D ca 0 0 N .. .:;.CD �ID l mmrn N L+m Q N CO c .� - -0r -• 0. (Q m mco m CL coN m co CD y _ V C ( 6 O. O_> m oO m _ 0. CDCD�' O. E m c m m Cj @ m m 0. i3. E E m —gym E � m cc, CDm m CO = O - o _ N coN N F 0 V m C L U >>m d, -_ co W - 0 O = C.p > O 0 (n00(l�00(n�00 O () (�O �C)�(n00(n0� v, LO LL (n LL LL (/) LL LL (/) LL LL LL lo()O LL (n LL (n (n LL 0 (n W (n LL LL Cl)LL w CL 'i:r�. fn !n U7 fn fn fn fn fn (n (n fn !n In In fn (n iI a 70 -a _0 (n > _0 'a (n > _0 _0 (A (n 'a > -a > > 'a > > (n (%) (%) C17 :Q: O O O O O p p O O O CD O O O O O O O O O CD CD O LO W N LO N mT T r T N O L 4`1 M ty f� (D 1-- LO '[t' Cl) d N O M "t M 00 CO O O Itr M M 00 M O N M O Cl) 00 (O r Cn 1� 0) C17 O O O r O O O O O r O � O r N O O T '-' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 p p O O O p G) O ea 1� O O O O N O O M M 00 O 00 d M CA M M M Cl T N T M 00 C6 ItUl Cf) � T O COM rpNNLo Cf)N C d r. In ti 1- CA h LO 1,- O O O O in (o r N O T il- co t (0 m O co N LO N 1- N O 00 N f• Cij N N N Co CO COr M c r T T N r T T c c . M coM �t � 4 N N N T T N CV T N T NN4 T T N T T N N T N T N T N T N N T N ■ CQ Y T G± N T TT N N T•' T N N T N 4 N V N Lo N co co N" co N N N N ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢ a a ¢¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ U- fL' LL LL LL LL LL ll LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL L1 LL LL _ 'c �.�L]: :}• MI •�F....... . ,:.;>:.... =ram. i� ; • x ?r;:::�:ac':::� +-5::.> A r-�,: {�f ::Sw'' � '�>s>fi: ice: s:.;:->:=:< . /a' •:a 4ik Department of Community Development Services 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 CITY OF — — — • - • • 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 FederalWaywww-citvofFederalway.cotn MAR 13 2018 �iuFEDERAL EW SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist, Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization, or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts, or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants:D-le-1pa This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use `5761 app'uca6le"or "does not apply"only �vhenyou caer explain �'hy it does not apply and not when the answer is mnkvown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies and/or reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process, as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to allpads efyorerpmposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal, and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first, but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use ofchecktistfor nonprojectproposals: Jel For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans, and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B, plus juui f-OR N0NPRQ FX,-l' AC1'1!L) art D . Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for nonprojects) questions in Part B (Environmental Elements) that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 1 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 A. BACKGROUND "el 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: VIdW Greenline Building A 2. Name of applicant: DLelp Federal Way Campus, LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Vidw 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 Los Angeles, CA 90025 310-261-4382 4. Date checklist prepared: VLe1W March 13, 2018 5. Agency requesting checklist: helO City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): B elp Commercial Grade & Fill work anticipated to occur summer 2018 Construction of Building A -and parking anticipated to begin Summer- Fall 2018. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Vidpi After the Process III land use review is complete and approval is granted, the applicant plans on constructing the 225,950 sq. ft. warehouse and associated parking and infrastructure. Right -of -Way improvements will be installed along Weyerhaeuser Way S upon approval of any future development that exceeds the 300,000 SF threshold outlined in the 1994 Concomitant Agreement. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. h[ ell l • Critical Areas Report for Federal Way Campus, LLC that includes the following: a. Geotechnical report; b. Wetland delineation; c. Wetland mitigation plan; d. Wildlife Assessment • Level One Downstream storm drainage analysis pursuant to KCSWDM e Preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) addressing relevance of the 9 Core and 5 Special Requirements of 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual. • Cultural Resource Report • Transportation Impact Analysis • JARPA ■ Environmental Noise Report ■ Air Quality Technical Report 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. DL64)1 Section 404 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. VLe1W Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 2 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 Section 404 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Commercial Grade & Fill City of Federal Way, SEPA Threshold Determination, Process III Land Use Review, NPDES Construction Stormwater Discharge Permit, Land Surface Modification Permit, Forest Practice Class -IV- General Application, and Engineering Permit (EN). 11. Give briefy complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this foam to include additional specific information on project description.) iel Federal Way Campus, LLC is amending this Process III land use application to develop a general commodity warehouse on 15.16-acres of CP-01 zoned land. The proposed warehouse will be approximately 225,950 square feet and include accessory parking for up to 255 vehicles. A stormwater quality control and detention pond are located off -site to the south on an adjoining parcel as described in #12 of this checklist. Limited commercial vehicle ingress and egress access will be from Weyerhaeuser Way S near the interchange ramps for Highway 18. A 50-foot wide managed forest buffer will run along the property boundary adjacent to Weyerhaeuser Way S and a 100-foot along SR Hwy 18. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. h�� Site Address: 337XX Weyerhaeuser Way S Federal Way, WA 98003 Located at the intersection of Weyerhaeuser Way S and 33rd Place S. Lot 1, City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No.16-102886-00-SU, recorded under recording number 20170210900007, in King County, Washington. Parcel Number: 614260-005 A proposed stormwater pond for the runoff generated by the project will be located on an adjacent parcel to the south. The parcel number is 614260-0200 and the site address is 3120 S 340h ST. The proposed stormwater pond will be located at the southern end of the property protected by a stormwater easement that has a 15-foot wide extension to the Warehouse 'A' parcel. More information regarding the stormwater facility located on the adjacent parcel can be found in the revised Preliminary Technical Information Report. This parcel is described as: NORTH LAKE ADD TO EAST TACOMA LOT 2 FEDERAL WAY BLA #16-102886-00-SU REC #20170210900007 SD BLA BEING POR PLAT OF NORTH LAKE ADD TO EAST TACOMA LOC IN E 1/2 OF NE 1/4 STR 21-21-04 B. E' NviRONMENTAL ELEMENTS iel 1. Earth a. General description of the siteD-ielpl (underline/circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Somewhat undulatory with a general downward slope to the east. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? VLe1W ±15% Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 3 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. h� el Weathered (medium dense) glacial till and unweathered (dense to very dense) glacial till. Generally silty sand with gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Vig1W None e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. l�ielw Cuts in the west and fills in the east will be completed to create a level development pad. A small portion of structural fill material may be imported for the building foundation. Native on -site material will be used for general fill. Approximate earthwork quantities: Stripping= 20,500 cubic yards Cut = 68,200 cubic yards Fill= 55,600 cubic yards Net Cut=12,600 cubic yards f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. V1614 Erosion could occur as a result of clearing and construction, particularly if earthwork is completed during periods of rainfall. TESC measures will be implemented as approved by the City prior to clearing and construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? VLdpl 39.61% (261,679 Square Feet) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: BLelpj The owner will institute an erosion control plan to be used during earthwork and construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some heavy machinery exhaust and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment. An updated Air Quality report has been included with the SEPA checklist which discusses impacts during operation. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. ael No. The updated Air Quality report compares the proposed project to Ambient Air conditions. Off -site sources do not appear to affect our proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: V1614 All construction equipment will be in proper working order and regulated for emissions by the manufacturer and local emissions laws. Vehicles entering and leaving the site will also be regulated for emissions by state and local emissions laws. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to keep any dust from impacting surrounding air quality. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 4 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 3. Water a. Surface Water D2f14 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. VLe1W There are no fish -bearing or perennial streams on or near the site. A man-made ephemeral ditch, unnamed, connects Wetland EE to Wetland DR. An ephemeral stream (Stream EA) occurs in the southeast portion of the project area. See attached Wetland report for more details.13 on -site wetlands occur within the project limits. Onsite Wetlands: DP (PFO), DQ (PSS), DR (PSS), DT (PSS), DU (PSS), DW (PFO), DX (PFO), DZ (PFO), EB (PFO/PSS), EC (PFO), ED (PFO), EE (PSS), and EF (PFO). All wetlands ultimately discharge to Hylebos Creek to the south. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. DLelp4 Yes, work adjacent to the man-made ditch is proposed- 9,949 square feet of proposed direct impacts (fill) to wetlands DU, DW, DX, DZ, EB, ED, and EE. Indirect impacts will affect Wetlands DO, EC, and EF. Wetlands DP, DR, and DT will not be impacted. Stream EA will not be impacted. See attached work plans and report for more details. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. VIL1W Total wetland fill to equal ±435 cubic yards. Fill materials will be sourced from the project site. The filling of these wetlands will have no long-term impacts on the surrounding hydrology. The runoff from the Site in the post -development condition will be detained within the proposed Stormwater pond to the south before being discharged under Highway 18. This path of water movement will be the same in the post -development condition as from the pre -development condition. Wetland EE does currently drain to Wetland DR through a culvert and associated ditch that was artificially constructed many years ago. That artificial connection between Wetlands EE and DR will be removed in the post -development condition as previous City concerns regarding the Site's stormwater discharges disallowed any site runoff to be conveyed to these remaining wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. VILlpJ No 5) Does the proposal he within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note the location on the site plan. el W No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Dielp No b. Ground Water Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 5 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses, and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.J_elpl No groundwater will be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or any other purpose. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial conudnf g the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Le1W No waste material will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. See subsection 3.0 for information for discharge of stormwater. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow'? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. iel Run-off from impervious surfaces will be collected and directed into en -site a stormwater detention pond located on the adjoining parcel to the south. Once detained and treated for water quality, the storm water will be released to the downstream system, including the off -site wetlands. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Didp4 Not as proposed 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No - discharge will occur at the natural location. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: The project contractors, users, and personnel will utilize onsite Best Management Practices. Attached drainage plans show runoff from impervious surfaces will be directed to on site stormwater detention pond. 4. Plants DIL10 a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: Vidpj X_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _X_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X_shrubs _X arass pasture crop or grain orchards, vineyards, or other permanent crops _X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? h�el Native Native trees and shrubs will be removed during site construction. 7 of 13 on -site wetlands will be filled; 3 wetlands and adjacent buffers of native trees and shrubs will remain. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 6 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.D-Ielpj No native threatened and endangered plant species observed or known to occur on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Daelp4 Buffer enhancement of native plants will be done as needed. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Himalayan blackberry, English ivy, English holly 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site, or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: Vjdp2 birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rabbits, squirrels fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: bass and perch b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. Vidpj Bald Eagle nest documented ±1,500 feet east of site; none on -site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. VILIpI The entire region is known to be part of the Pacific Flyway. The Pacific Flyway includes Alaska and the Aleutian Islands and the Rocky Mountains and Pacific coast regions of Canada the United States and Mexico, south to where it becomes blended with other flyways in Central and South America. However, the site is not known to be used by migratory fowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. hel Preservation of remaining wetlands and adjacent uplands - a corridor will be provided between preserved wetlands and a 50'-wide forested buffer will be provided along Weyerhaeuser Way S. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. Bullfrog 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Vie1w Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the project. Natural gas maybe used to satisfy incidental energy needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. iel No, the proposed building height will not exceed -70 42 feet above grade. No existing development utilizes solar energy in proximity to which the shadow cast from the building has any effect. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. Vidpi No plans included in the Commercial Grade & Fill Permit. Energy conservation will be addressed in the building permit documents. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 7 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Diglo None known. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None known. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None known. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at antis time during the operating life of the project. No known toxic or hazardous chemicals will be stored or used on site. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. State regulations regarding safety and the handling of hazardous materials will be followed during the construction process. Equipment refueling areas would be in areas where spill could be quickly contained and where the risk of hazardous materials entering surface water is minimized. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? VILIpI The primary source of noise near the project site is from vehicular traffic along Weyerhaeuser Way S and Hwy-18. It is not anticipated to materially impact the proposed project in any way. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long- term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. hieel Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during the site development. Construction would occur during permitted construction hours and always in compliance with the City of Federal Way noise regulations. Long-term impacts would be those vehicular trips associated with the warehouse. Noise generated from the proposed warehouse and office operations is not expected to impact surrounding properties. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any J1elPJ Construction activity will be limited to permitted construction hours and construction equipment will not be allowed to idle for continuous periods of time, which will help mitigate the impacts of potential construction noise. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.D-ielpj The property is zoned as Corporate Park, but the project site is primarily vacant with small areas used for landscape material storage. Pedestrian trails meander through the site. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 8 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 North- RESIDENTIAL/VACANT East- OFFICE West- Corporate Park South- Corporate Park/HIGHWAY The proposed development may have a minor impact with respect to the additional traffic related to deliveries and employee trips. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? VLe1W No 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how. No impact. The site exists on land previously owned by Weyerhaeuser Company and used for corporate headquarters for many years. c. Describe any structures on the site. VLe1W None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? hel No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? hh� Corporate Park- 1(CP-1) What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Vidpj Corporate Park g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? iel N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. iel Yes, site reconnaissance conducted by Talasaea resulted in discovery of 13 wetlands on the proposed project site. A copy of the wetland delineation report was submitted with this environmental checklist and is available upon request. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? "el Approximately 255 people would work at the completed project j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? VILIpI None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. iel N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. zel Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 9 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 The project will be developed in accordance with applicable City of Federal Way development and land use codes and the approved Annexation and Concomitant Agreement to ensure the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable Development Regulations. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any. None proposed 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.[helnl N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. rhell3l N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. Vid4 N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? iel The tallest structure on this property will be the proposed building at 45 feet max height above adjacent grade. The principal exterior building material will be painted concrete panel. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? DILIP4 Currently forested. Views impacted would be viewing SW from 331 PI S, viewing E from Weyerhaeuser headquarters parking lot. There is a 50' forested buffer that runs along Weyerhaeuser Way S. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. DILIP1 Maintain required 50' forested buffer along Weyerhaeuser Way S 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? iel Parking lot lighting would occur dusk through dawn at completed project. Minimal glare would occur from sunlight reflected off parked cars. Additionally, the headlights of traveling vehicles would occur anytime of day. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Jie1W No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Daelw None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. The managed forest buffer running adjacent to Weyerhaeuser Way S, along the property would diffuse and mitigate impacts from glare sources from either side of the buffer. 12. Recreation Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 10 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? iel Informal pedestrian hiking trails meander throughout the immediate vicinity. Please note that these trails are located on private property and no right has been conveyed to the public for their continued use. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. VLeIP4 Yes, the informal trails will be removed through the site by the proposed development. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. Vidpj A continuous sidewalk will eventually be installed along Weyerhaeuser Way S which will provide for formal pedestrian connectivity to the north. A pedestrian pathway will be installed through the Managed Forest Buffer to provide connectivity from Greenline Building A to the sidewalk and bus stops. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. Jaelpi The Weyerhaeuser Headquarters building was constructed in 1969 which makes it 49 years old. Pursuant to CFR 36, Chapter I, subsection 60.4 criteria for evaluation, the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters building may be eligible. However, the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters is not currently listed in national, state, or local preservation registers. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. VILIpI No known landmarks or evidence have been observed on or near the site. The northern portion of the site was previously developed as single-family homes in the 1950's. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation Nvith tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. iel The methods used to assess the potential impacts included GIS data analysis and WISAARD GIS data review. Please review the preliminary determination letter from Tetra Tech, who "completed a review of the Washington Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation website WISAARD for known archeological sites, National Register of Historic Places properties and completed cultural resource surveys located % mile of the project area. Tetra Tech also researched BLM GLO Cadastral Surveys to determine if any known archeological resources may be found in or near the project area. Additionally, Tetra Tech completed 6 shovel test probes within the proposed project areas to determine subsurface conditions and possibly the presence of subsurface archeological materials. No archeological features or artifacts were identified in the 6 shovel test probes." - Stipe, F (2016, November 28). Letter to Talasaea. Tetra Tech conducted 4 additional shovel test pits as part of the revised application and their report is included. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. If any such historic or cultural evidence is encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work will be halted in the area and a state -approved archeologist/historian will be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 11 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Le_1W The project site is primarily served by Weyerhaeuser Way S, north of Highway 18. Passenger vehicle access off the existing Loop Road is proposed at the northwest corner of the site. No delivery truck or tractor trailer access is permitted on the northwest side of the site. Delivery truck and tractor trailer access is provided at the southeast corner of the site closest to the Highway 18 interchange. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Vidw Yes, the site is serviced by Pierce County Transit route 501 with 2 stops along the property frontage on Weyerhaeuser Way S. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? Diel p The proposed project will add 255 car stalls and 30 trailer stalls for a total count of 285 parking stalls. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle, or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). hel Future frontage improvements are anticipated; however, no frontage improvements have been proposed with this project as the first 300,000 SF of new building is exempt from these improvements per the CZA. Property frontage along Weyerhaeuser Way S will be dedicated to the City for future Right -of -Way as part of the Process III land use approval. d. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity o� water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. -iel Not expected. e. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? VLe1w The updated "Traffic Impact Study for IRG Greenline Buildings A+B" indicates that Building A will generate 994 total daily trips (795 for passenger vehicles and 199 for trucks). The AM peak hour trips are 129 (103 passenger, 26 trucks) and the PM peak hour trips is 100 (80 passenger, 20 trucks). f. Will the proposal interfere with, affect, or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. Not expected. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. VLe1W Payment of the City's transportation impact fee is expected, which will help fund City-wide transportation improvements. Additionally, modifications to existing northbound center left -turn lane are described in the recent TIA. The project will add a left -turn lane at the south driveway for truck traffic. No left -turn from southern truck driveway onto Weyerhaeuser Way will be allowed due to installation of C-curb and median at that location. 15. Public services Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 12 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.D-Ielpl The completed warehouse facility would result in a slight increased need for public services to include fire protection, police protection, and health care. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.D-lelpa The increased demand will be offset by impact fees, levies, and taxes required to be paid by the applicant as part of this development. Also, the proposal has been designed in a manner that will provide adequate access for fire, medic, and police vehicles. 16. Utilities a. Underline/circle utilities currently available at the site: Le1W e ectdcity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other The above listed utilities are either available on -site or will be extended as necessary to serve the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Daelpi Lakehaven Utility District will provide water and sewer connection. Puget Sound Energy will supply electricity and gas Telephone: Century Link, Verizon, Comcast Fire Protection: South King Fire & Rescue C. SIGNATURE HELP The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Printed Name of Signee: Position and Agency/Organization: Date Submitted: Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 13 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 M D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS iel (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the iteiii at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 14 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 15 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014