The URL can be used to link to this page

11-105157 (2)CITY OF L Federal Way January 26, 2012 Don Kirkman PO Box 816 Auburn, WA 98071 CITY HALL FiLL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #11-105157-00-UP; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church, 1860 South 336m Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kirkman: The Community and Economic Development Department is in receipt of your Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application and environmental checklist. The applicant proposes to demolish an existing vacant single-family home and construct an 8,832 sq. ft. new church. Associated site improvements include parking, landscaping, and stormwater improvements. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.15.045, within 28 days of receiving an MLU application, the city shall determine whether all information and documentation required for a complete application has been submitted. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this letter a Notice of Complete Application. The Process III MLU application is deemed complete as of January 25, 2012. This determination of completeness is based on a review of your submittal relative to applicable requirements referenced within FWRC 19.15.040, "Development application submittal requirements." A 120-day time line for reviewing this environmental checklist and Process III application has started as of this date. The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line will be stopped at any time the city requires corrections and/or additional information. You will be informed of the status of the 120-day time line when you are notified in writing that corrections and/or additional information are needed. PUBLIC NOTICE The combined Notice of Application and optional DNS will be distributed within 14 days of this letter as follows: (1) at least one notice will be posted at the subject property; (2) one copy will be posted at each of the official notification boards; (3) one copy will be published in the Federal Way Mirror; and (4) a copy will be mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. The department also has the responsibility to notify other agencies that may have jurisdiction over your development project or an interest in it. Mr. Kidynan- January 26, 2012 Page 2 CLOSING lour development project, please contact me at 253-835- if you have any questions regarding this letter or y 2641, or rebecca.chapin@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Becky Chapi Assistant Planner enc_ NOA/Optional DNS Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer C. Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Sarady Lang, Scott Sproul, Plans Reviewer Chris Ingham, South Icing Fire and Rescue Brian Asbury, Lakehavcn Utility District Doc. I.D. 60191 11-105157 4ik CITY Federalo, Way DEPA ENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES nc 33325 8'a Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 AN I 1 Zotz www.cit offederatwa .cam CM of FEDERAL WAY rDS Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Checklist Directions Please fill out the checklist to indicate which strategies have been used to implement CPTED principles in your proposed project. Please check all strategies that are applicable to your project for each of the numbered guidelines. You may check more than one strategy for each guideline. Your responses will be evaluated by City Staff, and will be integrated into the Site Plan and/or Building Permit review process. Section and Performance Standard Section 1.0 1.1 ✓ Functional Area Performance Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review E) Applicable during Building Permit Review Evaluation for ' Agency Use Only Natural Surveillance Blind Corners —Conforms Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. —Revise NA Comments: IR Pathways should be direct. All barriers along pathways should be permeable (see through) including landscaping, fencing etc. ■ 0 Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead of them and around corners. e Other strategy used: 1.2 Site and Building Layout Allow natural observation from the street to the use, from the use to the street, and between uses Conforms —Revise —Revise Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and J Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Qnly Standard Strategy ■..Applirahle during Site Plan Review . e Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Orient the main entrance towards the street or both streets on For Non -Single corners. ■ Family Development ❑ Position habitable rooms with windows at the front of the dwelling. ■ Access to dwellings or other uses above commercial/ retail development should not be from the rear of the building. M Offset windows, doorways and balconies to allow for natural observation while protecting privacy. ■ ❑ Locate main entrances/exits at the front of the site and in view of the street. 0 For Commercial/ Retail/ Industrial If employee entrances must be separated from the main and Community ❑ entrance, they should maximize opportunities for natural Facilities surveillance from the street. ■ ❑ In industrial developments, administration/offices should be located at the front of the building. K Avoid large expanses of parking. Where large expanses of For Surface El parking are proposed, provide surveillance such as security Parking and cameras. ■ Parking Structures El Access to elevators, stairwells and pedestrian pathways should be clearly visible from an adjacent parking area. N U Avoid hidden recesses. N ® Locate parking areas in locations that can be observed by adjoining uses. a Open spaces shall be clearly designated and situated at For Common/ locations that are easily observed by people. Parks, plazas, Open Space ® common areas, and playgrounds should be placed in the front Areas of buildings. Shopping centers and other similar uses should face streets. r Other strategy used: ALL PARKTNG STALLS ARE E" THF BUILDING INTERIOR 5i _TMU W►I!./Wi OBSERVATION-470 St•:►Y A �•• + Bulletin #022 —January I, 2011 Page 2 of 9 kA\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use,Qnly; Standard Strategy a Applicable during Site. Plan Review E) Applicable during Building Puinit Rcview 1.3 Common/Open Space Areas and Public On -Site Open _Conforms Space �Rcvise Provide natural surveillance for commonlopen space areas. _NA Comments: Position active uses or habitable rooms with windows adjacent [] to main common/open space areas, e.g. playgrounds, swimming pools, etc., and public on -site open space. ■ Design and locate dumpster enclosures in a manner which ® screens refuse containers but avoids providing opportunities to hide. M Locate waiting areas and external entries to elevators/stairwells 91 close to areas of active uses to make them visible from the building entry. e ® Locate seating in areas of active uses. e Other strategy used: TRASH ROAM LOCATED IN ® WITH AN OUTSIDE 1.4 Entrances —Conforms Provide entries that are clearly visible. Revise _NA Comments: Design entrances to allow users to see into them before entering. N Entrances should be clearly identified (Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. (Applicable during Cerri irate of Occupancy Inspection). Other strategy used: El 1.5 Fencing _Conforms Fence design should maximize natural surveillance from the Revise street to the building and from the building to the street, and _NA minimize opportunities for intruders to hide. Comments: Bulletin #022 —January 1, 201 1 Page 3 of 9 kAHandouts\CPTED Checklist Section and Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review E) Applicable during 13ui[ding Permit Review ER Front fences should be predominantly open in design, e.g. pickets or wrought iron, or low in height. e Design high solid front fences in a manner that incorporates ® open elements to allow visibility above the height of five feet. e If noise insulation is required, install double -glazing at the ❑ front of the building rather than solid fences higher than five feet. e Other strategy used: 1.6 Landscaping _Conforms Avoid landscaping which obstructs natural surveillance and Revise allows intruders to hide. _NA Comments: ® Trees with dense low growth foliage should be spaced or their crown should be raised to avoid a continuous barrier..M Use low groundcover, shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in ® height, or high -canopied trees (clean trimmed to a height of eight feet) around children's play areas, parking areas, and along pedestrian pathways. -A ® Avoid vegetation that conceals the building entrance from the street. 0 Other strategy used: 1.7 Exterior Lighting Conforms Provide exterior lighting that enhances natural surveillance. —Revise (Refer to FWRC 19.115.050(7)(a) for specific lighting _NA requirements.) Comments: Prepare a lighting plan in accordance with Illuminating Engineering Society of America (IESA) Standards, which ® addresses project lighting in a comprehensive manner. Select a lighting approach that is consistent with local conditions and crime problems. ■ Bulletin 4022 —January 1, 2011 Page 4 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and Functional Area Evaluation for Perfor-man6e. Performance. Standard : Agency Use -Only. . Standard Strategy ■ Applicahlc during Site Plan Review E) Appiicable during Building Permit Review Locate elevated light fixtures (poles, light standards, etc.) in a coordinated manner that provides the desired coverage. The useful ground coverage of an elevated light fixture is roughly twice its height. r For areas intended to be used at night, ensure that lighting ® supports visibility. Where lighting is placed at a lower height to support visibility for pedestrians, ensure that it is vandal - resistant. 8 ® Ensure inset or modulated spaces on a building facade, access/egress routes, and signage is well lit. e ® In areas used by pedestrians, ensure that lighting shines on pedestrian pathways and possible entrapment spaces. e Place lighting to take into account vegetation, in its current and IN mature form, as well as any other element that may have the potential for blocking light. e Avoid lighting of areas not intended for nighttime use to avoid 0 giving a false impression of use or safety. If danger spots are usually vacant at night, avoid lighting them and close them off to pedestrians. e IN Select and light "safe routes" so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity after dark. ■ ® Avoid climbing opportunities by locating light standards and electrical equipment away from walls or low buildings. e 12 Use photoelectric rather than time switches for exterior lighting. e In projects that will be used primarily by older people r4 (retirement homes, coneregate care facilities, senior and/ or community centers, etc.) provide higher levels of brightness in public/conunon areas. e Other strategy used: 07 1.8 Mix of Uses In mixed use buildings increase opportunities for natural surveillance, while protecting privacy. Conforms Revise TNA Comments: Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 5 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance . Performance Standard Agency Use Only:. Standard Strategy. ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review B Appticable during Building Permit Review 1.9 Where allowed by city code, locate shops and businesses on lower floors and residences on upper floors. In this way, ❑ residents can observe the businesses after hours while the residences can be observed by the businesses during business hours. N ❑ Include food kiosks, restaurants, etc. within parks and parking structures. ■ Other strategy: used El Security Bars, Shutters, and Doors _Conforms When used and permitted by building and fire codes, security _Revise bars, shutters, and doors should allow observation of the street _NA and be consistent with the architectural style of the building. Continents: ❑ Security bars and security doors should be visually permeable (see -through). B Other strategy used: Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy N Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 2.0 Access Control 2.1 Building Identification —Conforms Ensure buildings are clearly identified by street number to Revise prevent unintended access and to assist persons trying to find _NA the building. Idemificalion signs must conform to FWRC Comments: 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. Pg Street numbers should be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. 6 Bulletin #t022 — January], 2011 Page 6 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and Functional Area Performance ... Pedormalnce Standard Standard .. Strategy W: Applicable (hiring Site Plan Review S Applicable during Building Permit Review In residential uses, each individual unit should be clearly numbered. In multiple building complexes, each building entry ❑ should clearly state the unit numbers accessed from than entry. In addition, unit numbers should be provided on each level or floor. e 5J Street numbers should be made of durable materials, preferably reflective or luminous, and unobstructed (e.g. by foliage). e For larger projects, provide location maps (fixed plaque ❑ format) and directional signage at public entry points and along internal public routes of travel. e Other strategy used: Evaluation far Agency -Use Only, 2.2 Entrances __Conforms Avoid confusion in locating building entrances. Revise _NA Comments: Entrances should be easily recognizable through design ❑ features and directional signage. (Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. 0 (2 Minimize the number of entry points. ■ Other strategy used: FRONT E3'I'RY HAS T ARGE ® - ENTR) _PORCH WITH HIM ROOF A=A TION 2.3 Landscaping ____Conforms Use vegetation as barriers to deter unauthorized access_ _Revise _NA Comments: ❑ Consider using thorny plants as an effective barrier. e Other strategy used. 2.4 Landscaping Location `Conforms Avoid placement of vegetation that would enable access to a Revise building or to neighboring buildings. __NA Comments: Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 7 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and v" Functional Area Evaluation for Perforniance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard.. : Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review 9 Applicable during Building Permit Review Avoid placement of large trees, garages, utility structures, ® fences, and gutters next to second story windows or balconies that could provide a means of access. ■ Other strategy used: 13 2.5 Security _Conforms Reduce opportunities for unauthorized access _Revise ILIA Comments: Consider the use of security hardware and/or human measures to reduce opportunities for unauthorized access. (Applicable during Certf6cale of Occupancy Inspecti n . Other strategy used: El 2.6 Signage Conforms Insure that signage is clearly visible, easy to read and simple to —Revise understand [Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt NA Signs]. Comments: ® Use strong colors, standard symbols, and simple graphics for informational signs. e Upon entering the parking area, provide both pedestrians and For Surface ® drivers with a clear understanding of the direction to stairs, Parking and elevators, and exits. e Parking Structures In multi -level parking areas, use creative signage to distinguish El between floors to enable users to easily locate their cars. e ❑ Advise users of security measures that are in place and where to find them, i.e. security phone or intercom system. e El Provide signage in the parking area advising users to lock their cars. e Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 8 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and f Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard. . Agency Use Only Standard Strategy. 2 Applicable during Site Plan. Review ® Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Where exits are closed after hours, ensure this information is indicated at the parking area entrance. e Other strategy used - Section 3.0 0,A,nership 3.1 Maintenance _Conforms Create a "cared for" image —Revise NA Comments: Ensure that landscaping is well maintained, as per FWRC Ll 19.125.090, in order to give an impression of ownership, care, and security. (Ongoing). Where possible, design multi -unit residential uses such that no ❑ more than six to eight units share a common building entrance. ■ Other strategy used: 3.2 Materials Conforms Use materials, which reduce the opportunityfor vandalism. !Revise _NA Comments: Consider using strong, wear resistant laminate, impervious glazed ceramics, treated masonry products, stainless steel ❑ materials, anti -graffiti paints, and clear over sprays to reduce opportunities for vandalism. Avoid flat or porous finishes in areas where graffiti is likely to be a problem. e ❑ Where large walls are unavoidable, refer to FWRC 19.125.040(21) regarding the use of vegetative screens. e Common area and/or street furniture shall be made of long ❑ wearing vandal resistant materials and secured by sturdy anchor points, or removed after hours. e Other strategy used: Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 9 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist KIRKMAN ASS®CCHAT ES 9 LLCC; P.O. BOX 816 • AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98071-0816 • (253) 833-7910 • FAX (253) 833-7915 kirkmand@nventure.com Proposed Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church 12/30/11 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STATEMENT The architectural design intent is to develop a building structure appropriately configured and in conformance with the City of Federal Way Community Design Guideline Chapter 19.115 FWRC for a place of worship for a small church congregation that has a limited financial budget. Therefore the architectural plan and the structural elements are strait forward, simple but with a touch of recognized church styling. The architectural design and mass of the building is, I believe, compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF CONFORMANCE TO DESIGN GUIDELINES. How this project complies with applicable design guideline of FWRC chapter 19.115. Community Design Guidelines: SITE WORK: Landscape plans have been developed with studied review of the City Requirements, for planting and vision security. Parking ratio requirements: These have been fulfilled to the city standards. Parking lighting as per enclosed photometric plan ensures proper uniform lighting, with lighting standards not exceeding 20' requirement, and with light shields protecting neighbors. Two accessible sidewalks are provided, one from so 336th St. and one from 20th Ave. So. Each entrance walk has clear straight views to entrance doors, with no corners or shrubs which provides good security. The open environment of the site provides 100% observation to all areas of the property through the building interior windows. The property has a line of pine trees along the west property line. These pine trees will remain as shown on the landscape plan. There are no other trees or shrubs on the property, only grass. RECEIVED DEC 3 0 2011 1 lTY OF FEDERAL. WAY CDS Due to the low volume of trash the church will generate, the owners elected to provide a dedicated trash room inside the building on the northwest corner, with an interior door and an exterior door for easy access in and out. All the utilities will comply with FWRC 19.115 by proper screening or location on the interior of the building. BUILDING EXTERIOR: The 60 ft. building length rule (FWRC 19.115.060) has been incorporated on the building east faced with a 2' set back in the wall line. Considering the church backs up to single story residences, I have dropped the roof line lower at the back facing the neighbors, and have used a low pitched entry porch profile. In general the roof heights vary and modulate as you move around the building. The architectural character of the church is rather standard for a small church with residential type of materials used to integrate with the apartments to the west and the other resident neighbors. Overall, we have endeavored to comply with the recommendation of FWRC Chapter 19.115 "Community Design Guidelines". 2 FILE CITY 4F _ Federal April 6, 2012 Albin and Shirley Gulbraa 33357 20"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com RE: File No: 12-100185-SE; REPLY TO SEPA COMMENTS Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church,1860 South 336th Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gulbraa: The city is in receipt of your February 9, 2012 letter. In your letter you express the following concerns: traffic flow and congestion in the neighborhood; noise and lights from cars and activity in the parking lot; height of the church possibly shading your yard; size/height of proposed landscaping along your property line; placement of the retention pond; and location of the front entrance. With regard to building height and design: The applicant is subject to height and setback requirements and the city's design guideBes. The proposed building height is within the height limits established for the zoning district and the tallest portion of the church is proposed to be located near S. 336"'. The building is set back far enough that it is highly unlikely it will cast shade on your yard. The entrance to the church is visible from the public right -of way with a direct pedestrian connection which satisfies the design standards. With regard to traffic flow and congestion: The applicant is required to submit a transportation management plan that addresses these concerns for city review. This plan will be considered in the Director's land use, and Hearing Examiner's decisions. Noise: The city adopts by reference the maximum environmental noise levels established pursuant to the Noise Control Act of 1974, Chapter 70.107 RCW. The required parking lot and perimeter landscaping are intended to address the typical noise and light associated with parking lots. Landscaping: The city can approve a different type of landscape treatment along the southern property line if the applicant makes a request for a landscape modification accompanied by a proposed alternative landscape plan. Although the city cannot require such a modification, we have forwarded your comment letter to the applicant and encouraged them to consider your concerns and propose an alternative via the request for landscape modification. Retention Pond: If the retention pond is located adjacent to the right of way, as currently proposed, it must be screened by the required perimeter landscaping or the landscaping must be incorporated into the swale/pond design. The concerns you raise in your February 9, 2012 letter can be addressed through the plan review process and application of zoning and development codes and they will be considered during that review process. The city intends to proceed with the issuance of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this Mr. and Mrs. Gulbraa April 6, 2012 Page 2 project. A copy of the DNS is enclosed. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 253-835- 2644 orjanet.shull@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Janet Shull, AICP, CSBA, LEED Green Associate Senior Planner enc: DNS 12-100185 Doc, I D. 60728 FILE ACRY OF Federal Way April 6, 2012 Tamara King 2100 South 336"' Street, #R6 Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www cityoffederalway. com RE: File No: 12-100185-SE; REPLY TO SEPA COMMENTS Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church,1860 South 330 Street, Federal Way Dear Ms. King: The city is in receipt of your February 2, 2012 email comment. In your email you express concerns about noise, parking, and parking lot use associated with the proposed church. With regard to parking, traffic flow and congestion: The applicant is required to submit a transportation management plan that addresses these concerns for city review. This plan will be considered in the Director's land use, and Hearing Examiner's decisions. Noise: The city adopts by reference the maximum environmental noise levels established pursuant to the Noise Control Act of 1974, Chapter 70.107 RCW. The required parking lot and perimeter landscaping are intended to address the typical noise and light associated with parking lots. The concerns you raised in your February 2, 2012 email can be addressed through the plan review process and application of the zoning and land development codes and will be considered during the review process. The city intends to proceed with the issuance of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. A copy of the DNS is enclosed. If you have any further questions; please contact me at 253- 835-2644 orjanet.shull@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, PN Janet Shull, AICP, CSBA, LEED Green Associate Senior Planner enc: DNS Doe ED, 60736 CITY OF A**� Federal April 6, 2012 Barry and Charlene Turnbull 33355 20`' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Way CITY HALL FILE 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com RE: File No: 12-100185-SE; REPLY TO SEPA COMMENTS Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church,1860 South 336"' Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. and Mrs. Turnbull: The city is in receipt of your February 3, 2012, letter. In your letter you indicate that you would like to have a fence that you can see through between your property and the subject site similar to a white picket fence on a neighboring property. The Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) does not require fencing along the property line and the city does not have the authority to require such a fence. The FWRC does require a minimum of 10 feet in width of Type III landscaping along the south property line which shall consist of a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees, shrubs, and groundcover. The city can approve a different type of landscape treatment along the southern property line if the applicant makes a request for a landscape modification accompanied by a proposed alternative landscape plan. Although the city cannot require such a modification, we have forwarded your comment letter to the applicant and encouraged them to consider your concerns and propose an alternative via the request for landscape modification. The city intends to proceed with the issuance of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. A copy of the DNS is enclosed. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 253-835- 2644 orjanet.shull@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Janet Shull, AICP, CSBA, LEED Green Associate Senior Planner ene: DNS Doc, LD. 60726 CITY OF ti. Federal Way August 21, 2012 Mr. Don Kirkman PO Box 816 Auburn, WA 98071 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com FILE Re: File #11-105157-00-UP; PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church; 1860 South 336'h Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kirkman: The. city's Development Review Committee (DRC) has- completed.rev.iew of your July 18., 2012; resubmittal related to the above -referenced Process IV land use application. The following are comments that must be addressed prior to our proceeding with issuing a Directors Decision on Design Guidelines and scheduling the Hearing Examiner public hearing. TECHNICAL COMMENTS/REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative noted below. Janet Shull, Planning Division, 253-835-2644, janet.shull@cityoffederalway.com While Planning staff finds the overall design concept in accordance with many of the city's development regulations applicable to church uses; some corrections and/or additional information is requested prior to scheduling a public hearing and issuing a determination on the Community Design Guidelines component of the Process IV application. I. Landscaping a. Modification Request— The July 18, 2012, resubmittal included a request for a landscape modification for the following: • To allow for smaller trees and tall shrubs in lieu of standard Type III landscaping along the north property line in response to neighbors' comments about possible shade and view reduction due to large trees; and ■ To allow for partial placement of storm drainage facilities (biofiltration swale/ engineered wetland) within the required perimeter landscaping along the South 320th and 20'h Avenue South frontages. With the modifications to the landscape plans detailed below and indicated on enclosed redlined Sheets L 1 and L2, the modification request satisfies the criteria of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.125.100. File 91 1-105157-00-UP Doc I.D. 61874 Mr. Don Kirkman Page 2 of 3 August 21, 2012 b. Dimensions —There is still one parking lot landscape island at the north side of the building that is not dimensioned (see redlined Sheet Ll). c. Tree Retention Standards — The landscape plan has been revised to indicate that the tree units per acre stiMdard. is met. We would like to note that you actually get 2.5 tree unit credits for each of the 20" caliper Doug Fir trees retained. While not required, as you clearly meet the minimum standard; you may wish to revise sheet L2 of 2 to correct the credit amount and calculation. d. Proposed Plantings — Each of the required landscape planting areas must include trees, shrubs, and groundcover throughout the planting bed. Some of the proposed parking lot landscape islands include only two of the three plant types. Each landscape island must have at least one tree. See redlined sheet Ll for landscape islands that need to have trees, shrubs, and/or groundcover added. Neighbors to the north of the site wrote letters to express concern with possible shading, leaf drop, and potential loss of view. The resubmitted landscape plans have eliminated the 20 to 30- foot tall trees in response to the neighbors' concerns. While the proposed plantings appear to meet the neighbors' concerns in terms of mature height, the initial plantings should be at least 3-feet tall to provide adequate screening of vehicle headlights and better noise reduction properties from the time of initial planting. Please update the plant lists on sheet L2 to specify larger sizes for plant material along the north property line. On the Plant List, please correctly show the symbol for "PF" Potentilla fruticosa—the symbol on the plans does not correlate with the symbol on the key on sheet L2/2. The proposed plantings along South 320'h Street and 20th Avenue South are subject to a modification request as noted above. The total planted area is 30 feet in depth inclusive of the storm drainage facility, which is sufficient to meet the intent of the required 20-foot buffer area as long as the planting specified also meets the intent of the required Type III "Visual Buffer" standard. In order to meet the intent of the Type III landscaping buffer requirement, additional trees must be added as noted on redlined Sheet M. Per Type III landscape requirements, the trees must be a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees. II. Administrative Design Guidelines Fagade Treatment — All building facades exceed 60 feet. Per resubmittal, all now meet facade treatment standards as follows: North Facade: building facade modulation and canopy plus partial credit for foundation landscaping South Facade: building facade modulation, plaza, and landscape screening East Facade: building facade modulation and landscape screening West Facade: building facade modulation and plaza While the plaza is allowed within the 30-foot building setback area, the proposed structure over the plaza is not allowed within the building setback area and must be deleted from the plans. Benches, seating, lighting, and other pedestrian amenities are allowed and encouraged within the proposed plaza area. File#I I-105157.00-UP Dm I D 61974 Mr. Don Kirkman Page 3 of 3 August 21, 2012 III. Garbage & Recycling The plans indicate that a garbage and recycling enclosure is being provided within landscaping area adjacent to the parking lot. The resubmitted plans were routed to Waste Management for review and comment. Waste Management has indicated that they will drive into the site to access the garbage and recycling enclosure. To better accommodate garbage and recycling collection, the gate to the enclosure should be enlarged as indicated on the redlined Sheet L1. Ann Dower, PW Development Services Division, 253-835-2732, ann.dower@cityoffederalway.com See the enclosed memorandum for Public Works Development Services Division comments. Sarady Long, PW Traffic Division, 253-835-2743, sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com See the enclosed Public Works Traffic Division memorandum for comments. APPLICATION STATUS Pursuant to the FWRC development regulations, city departments and the Hearing Examiner are allotted 120 days to review and endeavor a decision on the Process IV application. Any period in which the applicant has been requested to correct plans or provide additional information is excluded from the 120- day period. As of today, the review period has stopped with 75 days used. The review period will commence within 14 days of a resubmittal of items requested/corrected. CLOSING When resubmitting requested information, please provide four copies of any reports and six copies of any plans, in addition to the green resubmittal form. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2644, orjanet.shull@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Janet Shull, AICP, CSBA, LEED Green Associate L -Senior Planner enc: Bulletin 129, `Resubmittal Information' Memorandum from Ann Dower Memorandum from Sarady Long Redlined Landscape Plan Sheets c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer File 411-105157-00-UP Doc ID 61874 , , * Old Republic Title, Ltd. SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 5207098445 Unit: C Date: December 27, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. Fee : $ 200.00 Sales Tax: $ 19.00 Total: $ 219.00 FOR INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE ON THIS ORDER CONTACT: Old Republic Title Commercial Services Christina Hughes, Title Officer chughes@ortc.com Telephone: (425) 776-4305 Fax: (425) 776-3360 4114 198th St SW, Suite #4, Lynnwood Washington 98036 Reference: ATTN DON KIRKMUND WESTERN WASHINGTON CORPORATION OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS 32229 WEYERHAUSER WAY S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98001 Ladies/Gentlemen: In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, the Company (Old Republic National Title Insurance Company) has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land, Situate in said King County, to -wit: Vested in: WESTERN WASHINGTON CORPORATION OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS, a Washington corporation Legal Description: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT' A" FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS, SEE ATTACHED: RECEIVED 0798445 Pagel DEC 3 ® 2011 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS EXHIBIT "A" Tract 20, State Plat in Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 41 of Plats, page 30, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT the North 200 feet thereof; EXCEPT that portion of property that conveyed to City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation by Deed recorded under Recording No. 20061027000410. SITUATE in the County of King, State of Washington END OF EXHIBIT "A" 0798445 Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: RIGHTS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION and claims that may be asserted under unrecorded instruments, if any. 2. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, provisions dedications and matters delineated or disclosed by the plat of State Plat in Section 12, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Refer to the plat for full particulars. And recorded in Official Records under Recording Number 3562392. 3. Terms and provisions as contained in an instrument, Entitled Deed Executed By State of Washington Recorded in Official Records under Recording Number 4573874 Which, among other things, provides: Reserving to the grantor all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same, and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry. Right of the State of Washington or its successors, subject to payment of compensation therefore, to acquire rights of way for private railroads, skid roads, flumes, canals, water courses or other easements for transporting and moving timber, stone, minerals and other products from this and other property, as reserved in Deed referred to above. No examination has been made as to the present ownership or encumbrances of the reserved mineral estate. 4. Terms and provisions as contained in an instrument, Entitled Notice of On -Site Sewage System Operation and Maintenance Requirements Recorded October 11, 2007 in Official Records under Recording Number 20071011001116 NOTE 1: The liability of the Company under this Short Plat Certificate shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the addressee because of reliance upon the information set forth herein, but in no event shall such liability exceed the fee paid for this Short Plat Certificate. 0798445 Page 3 NOTE 2: GENERAL TAXES, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY AFTER DELINQUENT; 1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1: Year: 2011 Amount Billed: $4.211.72 Amount Paid: $4,211.72 Parcel No.: 797820-0100-08 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Valuation: Land: $ 198,000.00 Improvements: $ 125,000.00 SP/rob 0798445 Page 4 L I1VJ I4VVU5'. I 1 . Itfl j 20110314000949 MO R6Du9LM T NO es.00 PACE-001 OF 004 03/14/2011 14.42 KING COUNTY, 1)A When recorded return lo: Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Advent) 32229 Weyerhnuser Way S. Federal Way, WA 980D1 E2482173 Filed for Record at Request of 03/34/2011 14:41 KTpG COUNTY, UAgge Bnrlow Escrow, Inc. 165.22 SALE $2B9:900.00 PAGE-801 OF 801 EscrowNumber: 11020023 Special Warranty Deed THE GRANTOR UNION BANK, N.A. for and in consideration of Ten Dollars and Other Good and Valuable Consideration in hand paid, conveys and warrants to Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists, a Washington Corporation / the following described real estate, situated in the C�5 q County of King , State of WA OLD REPUBLIC TITLE LTD Abbreviated Legal: b-1 J + f L/7Tq— --,)I— Portion of Tract 20, State Plat in Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W. M. Tax Parcel Number(s): 797820-0100-08 Detailed Legal: Tract 20, State Plat in Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, Washington, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 41 of Plats, page 30, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT the North 200 feet thereof; EXCEPT that portion of property that conveyed to City of Federal. Way, a Washington municipal corporation by Deed recorded under Recording No. 20061027000410. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Subjecl To: Attached Exhibit "A" made a part hereof by this reference PROPERTY 1S SOLD "AS IS", "WHERE IS" WITH ALL FAULTS X The Grantor for themselves and for all successors in interest do by these presents expressly limit the covenants of the deed to those herein expressed, and exclude all covenants arising or to arise by statutory or other implication, and do hereby covenant that against all persons whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim by, through or under said Grantor and not otherwise, will forever warrant and defend the said described real estate. Dated March11.2011 Union Bank, N.A. I3y IL STATE 0 } COUNTY F j SS: I certify thatXhavc,"ti5tin tory evidence thatis / are thepeared before me, and said pc n acknowledged that he / she !signed this inowledge it to be his / h / their free and voluntary act f the uses end purpthis instrument. Dated: LPB 10-05(i-1) Page I oft 4�I IW—�U.V When recorded return to: NVesicru Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists 32229 Weyerhauser Way S. FederallVny, WA 98001 Filed for Record at Request or Barlow Escrow. Inc. Eszmw Number. 11020023 Special Warranty Deed THE GRANTOR UN ION BANK,N.A. for and in consideration of Ten Dollars and Other Good and Valuable Consideration in hand paid, conveys and warrants to Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists, a Washington Corporatiun the following described real estate, situated in the County of King State of WA Abbreviated Legal: Portion of Tract 20, State Plat in Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W. M. Tax Parcel Number(s): 797820-0100-09 Detailed Legal: Tract 20, State Plat in Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, Washington, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 41 of Plats, page 30, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT the North 200 feet thereof; EXCEPT that portion of property that conveyed to City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation by Deed recorded under Recording No. 20061027000410. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. SuhjrrCru:.Itiarlmd E shihir wA" made a part lrcreof by this reference PROPERTY 1S SOLD "AS IS', 111VHERE IS" WITH ALL FAUL'r5 X. ,, X�� Tltc Grantor for ihcntscivrs and I'or all successors in inttrcsl da b 11sm resen" is c 1 llmit the cavcnnms Y p P Y ollhe deed to those hdrein expressed. and exclude all covenants arising or to arise by statutory or other implication, and do hereby covenant chat against all pemons whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim by, through or under said Gramor and not otherwise, will forever warrant and defend the said described real estate. Dated March 9. ZOI I Union Bunk. N.A. STATE OF Ij COUNTY OF ) SS: I certil'v that I know or h c snlisfacrory evidence that is / w e the petty s) who appenred before me, and said p n acknowledged that he/-h�t signed this instrur ms and acknowledge it to be his / / their free and vol ry act for the uses aad pwpn :mentioned in this instrument. Dated: LPn IM5( -I) Page I nr2 [ t r VJ k uwuvy.uus STATE OF WASi NOTON COuntyof5ho koyvk"% -"", AUNOWLEDGMENT - cx[tl[y 1lue1kDow orhaveneisfaga,yevidence,ha: } i [bc Pe"O". Who APpeeaed Rp iam ma and aafd petton :cktwr.] rha[hcla6c �ld +mhntlted to a =ute the lnauy>; yt r '� nsrr rnenr. on oath,.,.. ..Y„ and a !edged it u the f CJ � r- r 7 m to be the free amd volan[iry iq of xuch PsM !at the tnca and •�� Wtpo[ea munionetr in chc inw„rrKm. OfV7rN under my�a,d aad of w seal the day and yev lut abort Wdacn. /BOLL Z. 0. o° NOTARY PUBUC 2 9 3-30.2013 �O or r�G' reora r M.e to am�or me sr"r e� ry -.r L MY rppoinunenr N1 Iua I UutJ9`J.VV4 Escrow No.; 1 I D20023 Exhibit "A" Subicct to. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, provisions dedications and matters delineated or disclosed by the plat of State Plat in Section 12, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, w.M.; Refer to the plat for full particulars. And recorded in Official Records under Recording Number 3562392, Terms and provisions as contained In an instrument, Entitled Deed Executed By State of Washington Recorded in Offldal Records under Recording Number 4573874 Which, among other things, provides: Reserving to the grantor ail oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same, and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry. Right of the State of Washington or its successors, subject to payment of compensatian therefore, to acquire rights of way for private railroads, skid roads, flumes, canals, water courses or other easements for transporting and moving Umber, stone, minerals and other products from this and other property, as reserved in Deed referred to above. No examination has been made as to the present ownership or encumbrances of the reserved mineral estate. Terms and provisions as contained in an Instrument, Entitled Notice of On -Site Sewage System Operation and Maintenance Requirements Recorded October 11, 2007 in Official Records under Recording Number 20071011001116 �~ S TATE PLAT r tr r SECTION 16 TWP.2IN. R.4E.W.M-EMBRACING w,,.. ALL OF THE NWI/4 NEI/4, S)/2 SW I/4.5W1/4 SEI/4,AND LOT 2 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SCALE 0- 400• 47 yr: tYt ,.•.`� f � , � x � w.. } � l :.•, I sf kL 40 ' :• , _ + I r tii VICINITY MAP .. s a x• N P 1- 1% T 7 = D SFAYk RQAD Kto,e3 tPAVCO) J. CoW l.rT. ' -6240 I�w JN STATE PLAT !-P SECTION 15.TWP. ZI N. R. 4- 1-, VV M SEvA.ANO LOT 2 WASHINGTON KING COL Umn 151 ORDER 001rhf ®r IR CopiTtSSIONER OF PUBLIC —ANDS OLYUPiA. WA%HI.070" Aj Iv BD 16. x F �T TE ER1,4 1 CGUMIr OF THU A r-st.As cOMMj.%'A;k' I. 3pm E R �PWBLI C NTE or CJI?4 Fy nqT Tv E P� TWP( {ills[. 0 $GATE tds, r t OTTO 2 N` D -WAND E"I ZkIN, A lkl'� pr�' AT Or Th E SUR V E.Y ANA, lUb C, � OF TIkI I .Al 4'" S07 2. SrvcTqOM I& TOWNSHIP Z�.'.v.'SlT'pf'JqA9GE +4"'F cEm 0 vit - b� P-5:n I �VN401�3& L ft*VMDMO F. REFO. cwI:Er fLmzq 9 %AVDa.jMD ACC;? of POIYg�DVEC A413AJDOPTEDEWORD'Eft Ap$1- -• "I THAT7HE MUMSCRS-4 TO 61 -NCLUSIVE,Afp !;Am HER ...... PLAT I lrLL BE �NQWN AB TRACT DE3'G%-'OArS. it K vm Of SIRE c -is AND Avem 11 CS SH OWN m tirkm rlDom XTO TO Tut Pwt6L ER ALW A ALA !'UK K P U FIFO MA ROY I NC- OM S 157 LN TZI.�� 1 UZ'r ItIC TO - - ' 4 .. &q. � AMID' CEF100C GUTS :A 7 Cl A450 r-- E P4A II, "OlVN 06'T"t PLAT I EH I �L ll�� P,�.IM T�A ILA"," o T�O "WE ALL 14W�ZSAOY SLOPE r 11X�4 F iG-mAL6RhC'Nr. pa AND --&KOW .07w AFASONAVILIC OR r - KtftE4 TM;-, C E 6 Tr FlICATE -0 IJPONT�113 PLAT IN OCCOIT . ANLE WITH '.00 T4 'JLLV PITIERI 1"'Me AMn D .55i, IONER CIF PUBILK :ANDS Or �sen 'I TH -EFERR:MC. 10 14kkO OF191A &AQ COMT�WM MkfIAL IS r THF M PL Lot'" AMC VHCPCGV ?I�TACILD. 51 R-t CT I ON 5/1 ATuars MEOF T, I:n LEDIWINE -.1 1 FIJ5",,. I USE CICE IT r :ALL TL 5 :. I ATSAJOOXCCa QIRECTC�ll`TH&i';w-4E DULY 4LAKCNI�C AL COP' OATKISPL ESS) USE AN OFFICE OF THE B OFFI , .1 a am E. COPY r 0 CpCor k M THE gf FiCk or I j4r� �'e •T. YS 1�10 WMat. ARE FkyaO 11, 11CIFAVED I (RESIDENCE I COUNTY AUDITOR OF IN a ;-wksplip"GIO.- — 11 '-lL usv -;- — ARE DIVIDED ' ySC AN 'yz . T '0'. IL.. '.'T A, SOLD On "=SOL WITNESS MY .... ANDpivgCtAt, STAL, rdig'-014 MY OF APRi L. A. 0 '9" 7ff CIT rOWNrR-�"IP Of ANY PORTION r C "Rol% F114", d. -os. R" A'�L 1L F 6 1 'AND Lt:3L THAN bO FEET IN ia� 'r";Qp0v'iT' -f-. A 2.3rel FURTHER THER TO THE PROVISION] Or Ai D ib a , I f r RoIn @I F L Dwci�r 4 c A P b " -rIOa ma. 4f:�" +jb 0 SU f'Qte N T A A S EAL ING MUNjlr *TSQ�,u 'NATE R.SVP v �' I�tATEft C O O P E RATUIVE' T.- SEWAGE DISPOSAL Z4 THIS Q; 1 .1 L A.D. 11146- FJLLL, A.D 104. A EXAMINED AND APPROVED F! LED NTHE 0;9;KE OFTHE. •.11- I..IR 11 DAY CF__.e lak-b-1 e I HEREBY CERTIFY71HAT"I'l WITHIN PLAT -1"STATE PLAT IN SECTION I.- �A TOWNSHIP 21 NOSTH, RANGE A EAST. W M.• 15 OULY APPROVED 13Y THE XING 3 UL _DUNTY PLANNING COMUISSION THIS.?ajt! DAY OF`AtL?jjz A. D. 1946 r 'j'a AND APPROVED THIS A. D. 19A6 _1�4 DAY FA L 1111,02 %T vi G. C.O MM- AND kIECCI(O'in rWLVO4"i,41 OF RECORDS OF K-G coviviv. }' ATE � 6.4A j", pivcali 41 L STATE PLAT SECTION I N 16 TWP. 21 N. R. 4 E.. W. M. EMBRACING ALLOFTHE NVVIINE14,5-5 WV4, SIN114 SE114 AND L01 ?- KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON SCACE 1--a00' N i- L s 1 7 di Vk. T 7 fi oe- ww— --- -j4 1 2661'H, STREET A 24 7 25 = 32 Z I a' 2"i 2 a 1 29 A iN t»�i%Yit1��i7Fi t�lw„p,,,•„w„�tA �"�i�i&t�.3Kt��_�--•.-r,...2�.....��. •.--��+.v.t.,,�r.�.;--.:..taH�uM•+w,'l,er,[��.,,�,I�'r4rrr.M'.....1.� l��iii�, 1ha rfrrotpl If# s sHkfi xrte ay ts� adq+�.' x bitisly {tf WIPIkOm duds T OaFfI, yr?t+it +tlrnNla, lidl OtV4 Cos.. )60-141d h. 1.4Mtkt 04 IAAAXU !fit OM.14A kt}#fr w Jcat4+u1„! ouipal,ih+ felkictl +?±:' !f`= plltlbal at;hael IltMtl►> lnC t'tinnfy, Wnlhtrlfjd•a, to t1JO.' - ftr.rt 20 Sol Obit:. Plai in Ancti" Its trtftuhir A Nurttll llaurte l F:.aat,j YJ4„ c-mr,!nla�.„ 34 kvrtal mar. yr lot., oaa,,rilittg ut iha otPltllol 11it Ahal•onf ato mp kn the nfPtr� aC thr t:our3Arir.Aer of NO id lr�l>aw of �111Y.kg1s, itn*hl"Atall. &ampriIAR for 4kiq Qawtt;' 11ranl5sl lost h ,JV4 llia! Sflt'�ri„Fat s„yC1 %b{tt; ll.aspla; ilea :bay} 1lesarthlul trsrt WIT lfr$lI isnl.twl a,/ A-1 (thI'aSelioatii tt+tio All} wr rtao •or vortivis ellrtpal rhll t tilt $!vW" #M a4d ar rTrrte!•t., :It ,>ornysrl,}p I,lt►rtSM3 yr t lyr ilimm.J wft?riot-r SCSI •H11t,►1s el k(r 0 tsar puMull TIP 11111. tole t alu1I 1.a let't flag{, /Setif? !S'M1z t-zt wl�,/ ir�a f}Htn 1l3 jr�t In ,.I11SA 4t 1111 I fall[ ln:llli;nq ! t!:f 1 .s, 41, u.. i...,1..., 1 1 hr . , 1y ..tt ■,..1.�„ S ... ., .1 ii :y 1.t I-k 1— 44r ... w �i aA .J ..+ 'i t•�y. r'• ..�'1••� -� . •�N, M•}'�►.•i+,,r ••1-y 1.a^. •`•�I.-r�gqrtIa'n1:•.ta..,1-rIn;t4{eYI h`'Jr`,.'"?y.Ir «4 11.tp . .-I;. ,{y fki-•4 lI x/711,4+{{rlflS....•1.i.3.f111 �. r.�' wy3la.taWI.S�.•...y..I�.,.N-r •.r•• {• �•ti•r /n1 lj-i IHM 4i [ 'iq I N'l.....i .1 i71 ... •� ... �i ...H..i_.: ., C �i�1 I.�..�._,.w «..e...� Nel�q r��u.:11. 1_ • � 1...1 ...s ;' .;`.... •....r r • N� r;:�.f :'� ` =Mr � i. HUF�j :1 • � f. �u. � ii .a 1, i .«rt 1,••1 a:ue � a'.i':�.I.I 1.•, -1 I .. 1 "" Srr • .a4. n , i �+ a rp-� 1e�� .� ... .�.y ...5 . s,,rr ........ • 1 11 s t T rn 1. «-1 ... +yi L i..3. wf.all,� ., f, r.F �.•�t��'^i,s Lr1 I �r �+�• y' p .. j .a�.�ri „�-. .. 1.1 c. rrw.,c •1 �f I Y H.Ls,•r .�•i +�1� H� latr�l �rw }fry. 1'tlM .7s• .. , .i�1x �,,.�,..1 �'• 1 .tir�, �w vv.11 Iw�•�n I�v.1�.1 Lw.. �� 1y 4w..T.. :. ��... �.uis.1 I... •.0,.... i•li..,l�, ar..�l 1~. .^i7...�jM .,.r1,. ..T 1','„ .�, •'r.,f,^`^.. ., .+4.,I,.i ,.L. :, af[J�.•111 >:S ;f a', ("r, 1iT I ,ppi)tromm re wit. -t i LaW IlllIlzwY. 1ntir4Jo.:It.1 JcAt:ulln tt. lk=11a,-ut fhvir lie ..'W', .r % NA %" Vii" rnl u� vh, ':I 11 •fult t.1 411 t11;s t } i •b,•r.1 r /stlrtt 11 Y .i {.I•Iu , r•11141y..f �,�,1 1 IY_74 g4H.11/11A04 S'm ArH e ..11nta kuz 17b4.4 i d.t l:+ 3wz,dE VY T'1;5� .,4W, b?Lia�i•+1±.ht.eSi�SHit./.�}r��.�ry,Sr.�S._=�:s i • �7ST•._..'F �_ .. • � _ �- ..nl:Ll '�I.M'--,KrL�if- ,m w'IG.hiV • �V F• i• r 7Ff..l4aA _�'� = _ a.rx^�tx�.�nrf�sr-:l Jam. _��.,�., f�c.CtY.' •• �_— 20071011001116.001 RETURN ADDRESS Thomas M. & Brenda J. Rolph 1860 S 336th Street 20071011001116 Federal Way, WA 98003 PAG001 C1F 00i KING COUNTY, WAg Please print neatl% or I_F'pC Illiul'nlntltln Document Title(s) Notice of On -Site Sewage System Reference Number(s) of related documents Tax Parcel ID#: 79782OC100 Additinnul Reference O's on Put!� Crantor(s) (Lust, First, and Middlo Initial) Rol h, Thomas M. Rolph, Brenda J. Adeiuonel grantun tin puge Grantees(s) (Lust, First, lliddlc Initiuq THE PUBLIC Additional grmtees on pine Legal DexCTiptinn (ubbriaviortJ form. ire. luI, block, pint or suction, Iu»•aship, runge, quarttrlquarler) Ptn. Tract 20 State Plat in 16-21-4. V41/P30 Additional legal is uo tinge Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 7978206100 Additional parcel d's an pure _ The Audinrr.-ReCorder bill rely till the in1'umluuun pltiwided m tivs form. The stuff will nor read thetluctimens to %eril't the uccuracp or cumpleWIV5S ol'the indexing it imoutiun provided herein. 20071011001116.002 NOTICE OF QN-SIT SElVA„ E_SYSTIv{VI I'ERATION AND MAIN-rENAN` R>C�[3EREMEIYT. Assessor's Tax Parcel I D#: 7978200100 /We (print) ngrotas & $rendLL c) h are the owners of real property within King County, which is legally described as follows: A 2. The above -described real property is served by an on -site sewage system ("OSS•'). 3. The Code Of the King County Board of Ilealth, Section U-60.005 establishes certain responsibilities or the OSS owner with respect to the operation and maintenance or an On -site Sewage System, as follows A. The OSS owner is responsible for the continuous proper operation and maintenance of the OSS, and shall: I. Determine the level of solids and scum in the septic tonic at least once every three (3) gears for residential system with no garbage grinder and once every year if, a garbage grinder N installed and, unless otherwise provided in writing by the health officer, once every year for commercial systems. 2. Employ an approved pumper to remove the septage from the tank when the level of solids and scum indicates that removal is necessary. 3. Cause prevenrive maintenance/system performance monitoring inspections to be conducted and any indicated service to he performed by an approved person at 2 minimum frequcncV in accordance with Table 13.60-1 unless oiherwise established by the health officer or the sewage review committee. 4. Operate and maintain all OSS in accordance with this title, with pertinent alternative system guidelines issued by the DOI I [State of Washington Department of Ilealth] and with the approved OSS owners operating and maintenance instruction manual. 5. Protect die OSS area including the reserve area from: a. Cover b)., structures or impervious Material- b. Surface drainage; C. Soil compaction, for example, by vehicular traffic or livestock; and d. Damage by soil removal and grade alierarion. 6. Maintain the flow OrscWage to the OSS at or below the approved design both in quantity and waste strength. 20071011001116.003 NOTI .E OF ONSITE SEWA ,E 9YSTElt1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REOUIREMENTS Page 2 7. Direct drains, such as footing or roof drains away from the area where the OSS is located. B. The owner shal I not allow: I. Use or introduction of stror)g bases, strong acids or organic solvents into an OSS for the pur-poseofsystem cleaning; 2. Use of a Sewage sr:stem additive unless it is specifically approved by the DOI I; or :. Use of an OSS to dispose ofwaste components atypical ofresidential wastewater, ror example, but nor. limited to, petroleum products, Paints, Sal vWts, or pesticides. 4. Note about Operation and Maintenance Program Fee: Rules and Regulations 02-01, amendment to the Code of the King County Board of I lealth, states, "At the time of sale or transfer of prriperty Ownership, the huger Or transferee of a proper[}' served by an OSS shall 1•orward to the health ntficcr a fee as set Inrth in the fee schedule and suhrnit a signet! copy of the notice on tide: as set for[h in Section 1 -1.56.054A." This rce is $40-00 per the Rules and Regulations 02-01, effective Jtine 17, 20112. "DaLed l,h dayof October nfhJ e s b nuflij ''I STATE OF WA' IINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING 2007 (year) (Owner '.e si hrrc) On this // ' day of D e& V_, before roe personally (In 0nllr) (year) appeared /h and tome knmvlr to he the individual(s) desc abed herein and who executed the foregoir)6 instrument as his/her/their free and volttntar►• act and deed for the uses and purposes herein stated. Given undermr� $ A yi� +ticial seal this / ' "day o1 /��1 N (monrlt) (year) N0Tq,5 %w ; -PIOUS LIG i�'o[try Pt- 0end for the State or Washington �J9y Residing5t �9:�4�'�C�. h1y Commission Expires 20071011001116.004 EXHIIBIT "A" The South 210 feet of lot 20, State Plat according to the Plat therof recorded in volume 41 of plats page 32 records of King County Washington LESS the Right -of -Way for South 336th Street described as follows: That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a13d of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 2.I ]North, Range 4 East of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast Comer of Tract 20, State Plat, as recorded in Volume 41 of Plats, pages 30 through 32, records of said County; thence North 89'13'36" West 270.82 feet along the South line of said Tract, which is coincidental with the North line of South 3360' Street, to the Southwest Corner of said Tract; thence North 00'l4'11" East 5.00 feet, along the West line of said Tract, to a point lying 5 feet North, as measured at right angle, from the South line of said Tract; thence South 89°13'36" East 247.13 feet parallel with said South line to a point of tangency; thence Northeasterly along a 20.50 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 90°32'02" and along an are length of 32.39 feet to a point lying 3 feet West. as measured at right angle, from the East line of said Tract; thence South 89°45'38" East 3.00 feet to said East line, which is coincidental with the West line of 201h Avenue South; thence South 00° ] 4'22" West 25.72 feet to the Point of Beginning. FILE CITY OF Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church File No. 12-100185-00-SE Proposal: The applicant proposes to demolish an existing vacant singlefamily home and construct an 8,832 sq. ft. church. Associated si:e improvements include parking, landscaping, and stormwater improvements. Zoning is Multifamily- RM3600. Proponent: Don Kirkman, PO Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Location: 1860 South 336th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003. Parcel #79782M100 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Janet Shull, Senior Planner 253-835-2644, janet.shull@cityoffederalway.com The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Wayhereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist,Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Federal Way Revised Code, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under th(State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.3 1C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable sigificant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued after using the a tional DNS process in WAC 19711-355. Three 3 written comments were received in response to the 14 day comment period that ended Februm 10 2012. There is no further comment period on the DNS. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk, no later than 5:00 p.mon April 23, 2012, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections Responsible Official: Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Address: 33325 8 h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 ri16 2012 -Signature: Date Issued: A g CITY OF ti.. Federal Way April 6, 2012 CITY HALL FILE 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Don Kirkman PO Box 816 Auburn, WA 98071 RE: File #12-100185-00-SE; ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETEPMNATION Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church, 1860 South 336`h Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kirkman: The city and jurisdictional agencies have reviewed the environmental checklist submitted with the Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Chruch Process IV Master Land Use (MLU) application. It has been determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is enclosed. The Optional DNS Process was used to review this proposal. The 14-day comment period required by SEPA Rules ran concurrently with the public comment period associated with the notice of land use application, which began on January 27, 2012, and ended February 10, 2012. The city received three (3) written comments regarding the MLU application or environmental checklist, which are enclosed. Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-355, a second comment period is not required upon issuance of the DNS. The enclosed DNS was issued on April 6, 2012. The city will provide a copy of the DNS to the Department of Ecology, agencies with jurisdiction, Puyallup and Muckleshoot tribes, and any other party requesting a copy. All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days following the issuance of the DNS. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period, which ends April 23, 2012. The decision not to require an EIS does not grant the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the city. The environmental record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions will be imposed to reduce identified environmental impacts, as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated city policy. After a final decision has been made on your proposal you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as permitted in RCW 43.21 C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. The city is not responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. Questions regarding the environmental review component should be directed to me at 253-835-2644 or janet.shull@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, r� Janet Shull, AICP, CSBA, LEED Green Associate Senior Planner enc: DNS Comment letter provided by Tamara King, received February 2, 2012 Comment letter provided by Barry and Charlene Turnbull, received February 3, 2012 Comment letter provided by Albin and Shirley Gulbraa, received February 10, 2012 Doc. I D 60369 CITY OF t. Federal Way March 28, 2012 Don Kirkman PO Box 816 Auburn, WA 98071 CITY HALL FILE 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #11-105157-00-UP; RUSSIAN UKRANLAN PAROUSLA SDA CHURCH 1860 South 3361h Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kirkman: The City's Development Review Committee (DRC) is currently reviewing the above -referenced Process IV land use application and corresponding State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist. The proposed site development includes a new 9,120 square -foot church/sanctuary building, stormwater detention pond, parking accommodations, and landscaping. The application was deemed complete January 25, 2012, and a Notice of Application (NOA)/Optional DNS was given January 26, 2012. Members of the DRC have provided comments below. In addition, the city received three comment letters during the 15-day comment period for the NOA/Optional DNS. These letters are included for your reference and response to the concerns raised. TECHNICAL COMMENTS/REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative noted below. Janet Shull, Planning Division, 253-835-2644, janet.shull@cityoffederalway.com While Planning staff finds the overall design concept in accordance with many of the City's development regulations applicable to church uses; some corrections and/or additional information is requested prior to scheduling a public hearing and issuing a determination on the Community Design Guidelines component of the Process IV application. I. Site Plan a. Parking — The parking layout shows three locations (both sides of landscape area "b" and along the west side of the building) where there are more than 10 contiguous stalls without a landscape island (reference FWRC 19.115.090(1)(h)). The parking layout must be revised so that there are not more than 10 contiguous parking stalls between landscape islands. Parking stalls and parking lot drive aisles must also be dimensioned. b. Setbacks — Parking may be located no closer than 15 feet from side and rear property lines. The site plan indicates that the parking lot is only 10 feet from the west property line. This distance needs to be increased to 15 feet. Mr. Kirkrtian March 28, 2012 Page 2 H. Landscaping a. Dimensions — The landscape plan must include dimensions to indicate the required setbacks and dimensions of the planted areas. The landscape islands at the ends of parking rows must be at least 6 feet wide. b. Tree Retention Standards — The city requires each development/redevelopment to maintain specific tree canopy coverage depending on the lot size and zoning designation. This coverage is measured via tree credits that are assigned to existing and replacement trees. The minimum tree coverage requirements for Multi -Family Residential zones are 30 tree units per acre; therefore, the subject property's density requirement would be 39 tree units (30 tree units x 1.3 acres). See the tree unit credit chart below for further details. Table 19.120.130-2 — Tree Unit Credits Existing Tree Category Tree Unit Credit Existing Tree 1" to 6" d.b.h. 1.0 tree units per tree retained Existing Tree > 6" to 12" d.b.h. 1.5 tree units per tree retained Existing Tree > 12" to 18" d.b.h. 2.0 tree units per tree retained Existing Tree > 18" to 24" d.b.h. 2.5 tree units per tree retained Existing Tree > 24" d.b.h. 3.0 tree units per tree retained Replacement Tree Category Small Canopy Species (Mature canopy area < 450 .50 tree units per tree SF) planted Medium Canopy Species (Mature canopy area 450 1.0 tree units per tree to 1,250 SF) planted Large Canopy Species (Mature canopy area > 1.5 tree units per tree 1, 250 SF) planted The landscape plan must show how retention and/or replacement of tree units on the subject property meet the minimum density requirement (39 tree units). If the applicant is unable to provide the minimum required tree units per acre on site; off -site mitigation or a fee -in -lieu payment into the City's urban forestry account may be approved by the Director of Community and Economic Development. Please refer to FWRC 19.120.140 for off site mitigation and fee - in -lieu options. C. Proposed Plantings — Each of the required landscape planting areas must include trees, shrubs, and groundcover throughout the planting bed. Some of the proposed parking lot landscape islands include only two of the three plant types. Each landscape island must have at least one tree. No plant material greater than 12 inches in height shall be located within two feet of a curb 11-105157 Doc. I.D. 60666 Mr. Kirkman March 28, 2012 Page 3 or other protective barrier in landscape areas adjacent to parking spaces. Please review proposed parking lot plantings, as it appears some parking lot landscaping (in particular the planter bed located where there is head to head parking) has species that will potentially grow 4 to 6 feet tall and spread so as to conflict with vehicle overhang and access. Neighbors to the north of the site wrote letters to express concern with possible shading, leaf drop, and potential loss of view (see enclosed letters). The proposed landscaping indicates a series of evergreens that could grow 20-30 feet tall along the north property line. Given the comments of the neighbors to the north, the city would consider a request to modify the typical Type III landscape standard to allow for a mix of plantings/fencing that would better satisfy the neighbors' concerns for sun access to their yards. Reference FWRC 19.125.100 for modification option. d. Biofiltration SwalelRetention pond — The landscape plan indicates that the biofiltration swale is being included in the required perimeter landscaping along South 3361h and 20`h Avenue South. This is allowable only through a request for modification as outlined in the preceding paragraph. While the facility along the south side of the building appears to be a biofiltration swale which may be allowed within the required landscape area via a request for landscape modification, the portion along the eastern side of the building appears to be a retention pond with a depth of up to 8 feet. There is a rockery incorporated into the design of the stormwater facility. The civil drawings indicate the rockery is up to 8 feet in height. Rockeries are limited to 6 feet in height in detention and retention ponds. The portion of the facility along the eastern side of the building will need to be revised to reduce the height of the rockery and ensure that the facility can be integrated into the proposed landscaping so as to meet the intent of the perimeter landscape treatment. III. Administrative Design Guidelines a. Fagade Treatment — All building facades exceed 60 feet. The south and east facades meet the requirements of FWRC 19.115.060(2)(a-d) by incorporating both fagade modulation and landscape screening (see below). It is not clear from the elevations and plans submitted that the north and west fagade treatments incorporate at least two of the following four methods. It appears that the north fagade could potentially get credit for a Pedestrian Plaza (see number 4 below). The plans and elevations must be revised to clearly indicate how the north and west facades meet minimum fagade treatment standards. In addition, please correct the elevation titles on the Elevation plan sheets. 1. Facade Modulation — A minimum depth of two feet, minimum width of six feet, and maximum width of 60 feet. Alternative methods to shape a building such as angled or curved fagade elements, offset planes, wing walls, and terracing will be considered, provided that the intent of the section is met. 2. Landscape Screen i — Eight -foot -wide Type II landscape screening along the base of the fagade, except Type IV may be used in place of Type II for facades that are comprised of 50 percent or more window area, and around building entrances. With the current building placement, the required buffer landscaping abutting 2& Avenue South and South 339' I1-105157 Doc I D. 60666 Mr. Kirkman March 28, 2012 Page 4 Street may be considered in meeting this requirement. To utilize this option, an increase to a Type II landscaping in a portion of the Type III required buffer planting may be necessary. Canopy or Arcade — As a modulation option, canopies or arcades may be used only along facades that are visible from a right-of-way. Minimum length is 50 percent of the length of the fagade using this option. As proposed, it appears all four facades would be visible from the right-of-way. 4. Pedestrian Plaza — Plaza square footage is equal to one percent of the gross floor area of the building, but it must be a minimum of 200 square feet. The plaza should be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. The optimum location for a pedestrian plaza, should you choose this option, would be on the corner of 20`h Avenue South and South 33e Street and may be credited with treatments to the east and south facades. b. FVWRC 19.115.090(1)(i) requires pedestrian walkways from the right-of-way to measure six feet in width. Please revise the two walkwa s on the north and west sides of the buildin foa rint to reflect this requirement. C. FWRC 19.115.050(1)(b) and 19.115.050(4)(e) specify that pedestrian amenities should be incorporated into the site design. Please indicate ro osed site furniture including,but not limited to: outdoor seating, trash receptacles. and lighting, The City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan identifies South 336`h Street as a corridor with existing and proposed future bike lanes. Staff suggests the placement of a bicycle rack in a pedestrian area to encourage additional transportation options for youth groups and church staff to utilize during hours of church operation. W. Lighting No information on proposed site lighting was included with the plans. Please indicate site lighting on a site plan with typical lighting pole and fixture detail that will be used in the parking lot and pedestrian circulation areas. The recommended Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) minimum outdoor light levels as required by the city's CPTED policy is a minimum average maintained footcandles of lfc in parking areas and 0.2fc for commercial pedestrian ways. The poles should not be taller than 20 feet and shall include cutoff shields. V. Garbage & Recycling The plans indicate that a garbage and recycling enclosure is being provided inside of the building. Please submit more details indicating the size of the enclosure and how it will be accessed for collection. An area with a minimum of 65 square feet must be available for recycling. VI. Parking Stall Count — The Parking requirements table on Sheet Al. 0 1 indicates a total of 265 stalls, but the parking provided in the table adds up to 87. Please correct the table. 11-105157 Doc. I D. 60666 Mr. Kirkman March 28, 2012 Page 5 Ann Dower, Dev. Services Division, 253-835-2732, ann.dower@cityoffederalway.com Public Works has reviewed the December 30, 2011 submittal. Prior to Land Use Approval, the following Technical Review comments shall be addressed: a. Storm Water— The site is 55,402 square feet and the project will result in 37,650 square feet of impervious area, which is 67% impervious surface coverage. Therefore, section 5.2.1.3 of the 2009 KCSWDM applies. Please show proposed BMPs and a perforated pipe connection between roof downspouts and drainage system. The downstream analysis must extend at least 1/4 mile downstream. Clarify how far this study extends. In addition, evaluate the upstream drainage for any flooding or erosion impacts that might occur as a result of the project. b. Landscape Plans — Malus "Adams" or "Robinson" may be used as street trees. "Snowdrift" is not an approved variety. c. Streetlights — Streetlights are required for this project. Design does not need to occur at this point, but they should be shown conceptually on the site plan. Sarady Long, Traffic Division, 253-835-2743, sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com The Public Works Traffic Division has reviewed the submitted material and provides the following technical comments: The submitted sight distance analysis depicted adequate sight line for full access onto South 336`' Street; however, the driveway is located within the eastbound left turn pocket. Staff is supportive in allowing full access and will restrict this driveway to right -in and right -out at such time it's deems necessary for safety. Transportation Management Plan The submitted transportation management plan is not adequate to address traffic impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The TMP should be revised to include the following information. 1. Parking demands using ITE 85 percentile and number of stalls provided. 2. Uses on site, days and hours of uses (schedules of services) including number of people. 3. Peak parking demands for the site including any special event. 4. Traffic circulation and potential queuing issue that may impact adjacent street. 5. Parking overflow during special event, if any. Citizen Comments Received during the Public Notice Period Two comment letters and one e-mail comment were received from residents on neighboring properties. We are enclosing these comment letters/e-mail for your consideration and response. In your resubmittal, please respond to the comments. It should be noted that with regard to the concerns about tall evergreen trees along the south property line, the city will entertain a request for a landscape modification to address this concern as the typical landscape requirement includes evergreen trees. 1 1-105157 Doc. I D. 60666 Mr. Kirkman March 28, 2012 Page 6 The issues/concerns raised in the comment letters are summarized as follows: Landscaping and Fencing Residents on the two lots to the north had concerns about excessive shading and view blockage. Resident on the NW corner lot requested low picket fence similar to the one at the neighboring townhome project. Resident on the NE corner lot requested 6-foot chain link with slats -to block vehicle lights. (See discussion in Section II above regarding the option of requesting a landscape modification to address some of these concerns.) Noise Two of the commenters were concerned about excessive noise from cars and outdoor activity on the site. Traffic Concern about traffic flow on 20`h and how vehicle queuing and turning movements will be addressed. Building Height Concern that church building might shade property to the NE of site. (Note: it appears the tallest building sections are located furthest from the neighboring properties and so shading from the church building on adjacent properties is unlikely.) Retention Pond Placement Concern that the pond is not placed in the best location on basis of aesthetics — concern it will be unattractive. Front Entrance Concern that the front entrance does not face a street. APPLICATION STATUS Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code development regulations, City departments and the Hearing Examiner are allotted 120 days to review and endeavor a decision on the Process IV application. Any period in which the applicant has been requested to correct plans or provide additional information is excluded from the 120-day period. As of today, the review period has stopped with 56 days used. The review period will commence within 14 days of a resubmittal of items requested/corrected. CLOSING When resubmitting requested information, please provide four copies of any reports and six copies of any plans, in addition to the green resubmittal form. Pursuant to FWRC § 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2644, orjanet.shull@cityoffederalway.com. 11-105I57 Doc I D 60666 Mr. Kirkman March 28, 2012 Page 7 incerely, f (:j et Shull, AICP, CSBA, LEED Green Associate Senior Planner enc: Bulletin 129 `Resubmittal Information' Letter from Albin and Shirley Gulbraa, dated February 9, 2012 Letter from Barry and Charlene Turnbull, dated February 1, 2012 E-mail from Tamara King, dated February 2, 2012 c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer 11-105157 Doc. I.D. 60666 CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 ww dtYoffeder alway= DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, at a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce (DS) and Scoping Notice Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other. ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pemnit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was Amailed ❑ faxed 0 e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on l 2012. Got Project Name gACSkn a� JDA- C File Number(s) J 2.100 Signature Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 4/6/2012 11:52:00 AM CITY OF Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church File No.12-100185-00-SE Proposal: The applicant proposes to demolish an existing vacant singlefamily home and construct an 8,832 sq. ft. church. Associated sire improvements include parking, landscaping, and stormwater improvements. Zoning is Multifamily- RM3600. Proponent: Don Kirkman, PO Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Location: 1860 South 336`h Street, Federal Way, WA 98003. Parcel #7978240100 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Janet Shull, Senior Planner 253-835-2644, janet.shull@cityoffederalway.com The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Wayhereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist Federal Way Comprehensive Plar4 Federal Way Revised Code, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under thState Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.31 C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable sigificant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 19711-355. Three 3 written comments were received in response to the 14 da comment period that ended Februga 10 2012. There is no further comment period on the DNS. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk, no later than 5:00 p.mon April 23, 2012, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections Responsible Official: Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Address: 33325 8t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Issued: April 6, 2012 1 Signature:. DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov Mail DNS to the following agencies: PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 BRIAN ASBURY LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 basbury@lakehaven.org Mail DNS to the following parties of record: MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1 sT AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 info@southkingfire.org Tamara King Barry and Charlene Turnbull Albin and Shirley Gulbraa 2100 South 336th Street, #R6 33355 20t' Avenue South 33357 20th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Rebecca Chapin From: Rebecca Chapin Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 2:02 PM To: 'sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov' Subject: Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church DNS Attachments: Russian Ukrainian SDA Church DNS.pdf Attached is the DNS for Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church. This is being issued on April 6, 2012 after the optional DNS process. The Senior Planner for the project is Janet Shull, 253-835-2644, janet.shull _cityoffederalway.com. Becky Chapin Assistant Planner Community and Economic Development City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253-835-2641 RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JAN 18 �, -i January 17, 2013 Dear City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development Department 33325 8t". Ave. South Federal Way WA 98003 Don Kirkman P.O. Box 816 Auburn, WA 98071 Dear City Planners and Applicant, I would like to express my feeling about the New Russian Ukrainian Parsousia SDA Church/ 11-105157-00-UP at 1860 S. 336th. Street I am in total agreement with the project and how it will improve the neighborhood. The only concern I have is what I have lived with the last twenty years with the condos on the West end of the property. They have a wood fence and it is constantly falling over. As I write this the fence is down and no one has fixed it for weeks. I have it on my side also and have fixed it numerous times using my own time and money. This is where I would like the applicant to think about putting a white plastic fence like the one East of them in the condos. It has been up many years and has not fallen over and staid upright. It did have problems with the trees during bad weather but was fixed. Branches came down and broke the top half. It is much more presentable and adds to the community as many cars travel on 336th Thank you for reading this and will leave the decision to you. Barry Turnbull 33355 20th. Ave South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 344-1518 RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVEI.OPME" Community & Economic Development City of Federal Way 333258 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 TO: The Hearing Examiner: 2100 S. 336" St. #G-1 Federal Way, WA 98003-8967 January 13, 2013 Ref. Russian Ukrainian Parsousia SDA Church, File # 11-105157-00-UP. I cannot attend the hearing on January 30th because I have to work; therefore, I am submitting my comments in writing. I oppose this project for the same reasons I opposed the CFC Church which they built right across from our property. There are three reasons for my opposition: (1) it is too close to the downtown core and this is mainly a residential area and is a very bad location to be building churches; (2) they already have a church directly east off the second traffic circle from Weyerhauser Way S.; (3) you should not approve the application unless they mitigate the traffic situation by reimbursing the city to expand S. 336th Street east of Pacific Highway South from two to a four lane road. Sincerely, AARR XBERTSJON t � r - vs� �Sr r CITY OFFederal Wray DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 vwvw.cit of€ederolwa . DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION z�_�chereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter j Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pemnit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was J mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on , 2013. Project Name u Ss File Number(s) II —1b 5/S-7 Signature _ Date ) —J� — K:\CD A dministra lion Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Lash printed 1/10/2013 11:39:00 AM 46 CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at 2:00 p.m., or soon thereafter, on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, in the Federal Way City Council Chambers, 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA. Project Name/File Number: Russian Ukranian Parsousia SDA Church / 11-105157-00-UP Requested Decision and Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Process IV "Hearing Examiner" decision pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code Chapter 19.70. The applicant proposes church facility improvements that include a new 9,120 square -foot sanctuary building, 83-stall parking area, stormwater facilities, and landscaping. Site work will require the demolition of an existing single family home to accommodate proposed improvements. Applicant: Don Kirkman, P.O. Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Project Location: 1860 South 336`11 Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Application Received: December 30, 2011 Date Determined Complete: January 25, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: January 27, 2012 Permits Required by this Application: Process IV `Hearing Examiner' (File 11-105157-UP); Environmental Threshold Determination (File 12-100185-SE); and Traffic Concurrency (File 11-105158- CN). Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Review: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy'; Title 16, `Surface Water Management'; Title 19, `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comments and Appeals: Any person may submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Any person may provide verbal comments during the hearing and/or request a copy of the decision. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or provide verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the land use decision. Details of appeal procedures will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and existing environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Senior Planner Janet Shull, AICP, 253-835-2644 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on January 11, 2013. Doc. LD. 62971 Dept of Ecology Environmental Review Sec PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Attn: Env Reviewer 39015 172"d Ave SE Auburn, WA 98092 Puyallup Tribe of Indians Attn: Env Reviewer 3009 E Portland Ave Tacoma, WA 98404 Brian Asbury Lakehaven Utility Dist PO Box 4249 Federal Way, WA 98063 South King Fire and Rescue 31617 15t Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 X VAXS�aa_VL Mail DNS to the following agencies: DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov r" w 2100 South "reet, #R6 Federal Way, 98003 PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 BRIAN ASBURY LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 basbury@lakehaven.org Mail DNS to the following parties of record: 33355 `° Avpalge South Federal A 98003 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1 ST AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 info@southkingfire_org and S ' ey Gulbraa 33357 Avenue South Fe al Way. 98003 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 CITY OF y - 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cilyoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, Andrea L.B kerk hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter XNotice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pemit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was Xmailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on jai , , 2013. Project Name Russian Ukranian Parsousia SDA Church File Number(s) 11-105157-00-UP Date_ 1/11/2013 K:\CD Administralion Files\Declaration of Distribufion.doc/Last printed 1/11/20138:56:00 AM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at 2:00 p.m., or soon thereafter, on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, in the Federal Way City Council Chambers, 33325 8 h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA. Project Name/File Number: Russian Ukranian Parsousia SDA Church / 11-105157-00-UP Requested Decision and Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Process IV "Hearing Examiner" decision pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code Chapter 19.70. The applicant proposes church facility improvements that include a new 9,120 square -foot sanctuary building, 83-stall parking area, stormwater facilities, and landscaping. Site work will require the demolition of an existing single family home to accommodate proposed improvements. Applicant: Don Kirkman, P.O. Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Project Location: 1860 South 336"' Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Application Received: December 30, 2011 Date Determined Complete: January 25, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: January 27, 2012 Permits Required by this Application: Process IV `Hearing Examiner' (File 11-105157-UP); Environmental Threshold Determination (File 12-100185-SE); and Traffic Concurrency (File 11-105158- CN). Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Review: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy'; Title 16, `Surface Water Management'; Title 19, `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comments and Appeals: Any person may submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Any person may provide verbal comments during the hearing and/or request a copy of the decision. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or provide verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the land use decision. Details of appeal procedures will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and existing environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 8t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Senior Planner Janet Shull, AICP, 253-835-2644 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on January 11, 2013. Doc. I.D. 62871 i CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cit off deralwo om DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, Kennith Georae _ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Larid Use Decision Letter Xtice of Public Hearing before the 'Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or osted to or at each of the attached addresses on January 10 , 2073. Project Name. Russian Ukranian Parsousia SDA Church File Number(s) 11-10515700-UP Signature Date ��Drl/ K:\Intern\Declaration of of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc Pasting Sites: Federal Way City Hall- 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library- 34200 lst Way South Subject Site- Yellow Notice Board at 1860 South 336h ST K:\Intem\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc ... 4i�, CITY Of Federal Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at 2:00 p.m., or soon thereafter, on Wednesday, .January 30, 2013, in the Federal Way City Council Chambers, 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA. Project Name/File Number: Russian Ukranian Parsousia SDA Church / 11-105157-00-UP Requested Decision and Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Process IV "Hearing Examiner" decision pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code Chapter 19.70. The applicant proposes church facility improvements that include a new 9,120 square -foot sanctuary building, 83-stall parking area, stormwater facilities, and landscaping. Site work will require the demolition of an existing single family home to accommodate proposed improvements. Applicant: Don Kirkman, P.O. Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Project Location: 1860 South 336 h Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Application Received: December 30, 2011 Date Determined Complete: January 25, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: January 27, 2012 Permits Required by this Application: Process IV `Hearing Examiner' (File 11-105157-UP); Environmental Threshold Determination (File 12-100185-SE); and Traffic Concurrency (File 11-105158- CN). Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Review: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy'; Title 16, `Surface Water Management'; Title 19, `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comments and Appeals: Any person may submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Any person may provide verbal comments during the hearing and/or request a copy of the decision. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or provide verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the land use decision. Details of appeal procedures will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and existing environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 Bch Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Senior Planner Janet Shull, AICP, 253-835-2644 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on January 11, 2013. Doc I.D. 62871 r DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ' 33325 8t" Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cit offederolwa .com Federc-'�- DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION J hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed XI e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2013. Project Name File Number(s) Signature ' ` Date K:\CD Administration Res\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /10/2013 10:35:00 AM .�k CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at 2:00 p.m., or soon thereafter, on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, in the Federal Way City Council Chambers, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA. Project Name/File Number: Russian Ukranian Parsousia SDA Church / 11-105157-00-UP Requested Decision and Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Process IV "Hearing Examiner" decision pursuant to Federal Wary Revised Code Chapter 19.70. The appl icant proposes church facility improvements that include a new 9,120 square -foot sanctuary building, 83-stall parking area, stormwater facilities, and landscaping. Site work will require the demolition of an existing single family home to accommodate proposed improvements. Applicant: Don Kirkman, P.O. Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Project Location: 1860 South 336th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Application Received: December 30, 2011 Date Determined Complete: January 25, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: January 27, 2012 Permits Required by this Application: Process IV `Hearing Examiner' (File 11-105157-UP); Environmental Threshold Determination (File 12-100185-SE); and Traffic Concurrency (File 11-105158- CN). Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Review: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy'; Title 16, `Surface Water Management'; Title 19, `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comments and Appeals: Any person may submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Any person may provide verbal comments during the hearing and/or request a copy of the decision. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or provide verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the land use decision. Details of appeal procedures will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and existing environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Senior Planner Janet Shull, AICP, 253-835-2644 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on January 11, 2013. Doc LD.62871 Tina Piety From: Rudi Alcott <ralcott@fedwaymirror.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 5:06 PM To: Tina Piety Subject: Re: Legal Notice Tina, No problem. I'll get this one in for you also. Thanks, Rudi Alcott Publisher Office: 253-925-5565, Ext 1050 Internal: 02-1050 Fax:253-925-5750 Mobile: 253-336-5359 31919 1st Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 191, Sound Publishing, Inc. Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit Sound Info On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Rudi Alcott cralcott6 fedwa mirrolr.com> wrote: Tina, No problem. I'll get this in for you. Thanks, Rudi Alcott Publisher Office: 253-925-5565, Ext_1050 Internal: 02-1050 Fax:253-925-5750 Mobile: 253-336-5359 31919 1 st Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 D- Sound Publishing, Inc. Map Print Rates Online Rates Media_ Kit Sound Info On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Tina Piety <Tina.Piety cityoffederalway.com> wrote: Hello, 1 Please publish the attached legal notice (Soundview Manor Notice of Public Hearing, 07-105157) in Friday's (1/11/13) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. Thank you, Tina Piety, Administrative Assistant II Department of Community and Economic Development City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609 CITY OF Federal December 17, 2012 Mr. Don R. Kirkman Kirkman Associates, LLC P.O. Box^81-6 Auburn, WA 98071-0816 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South FederaWay l Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. ci"ffederalway. cam FILE Re: File #11-105157-00-UP; DESIGN DECISION Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church 1860 South 336th Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kirkman: This design decision is issued for the above -referenced project pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.65, "Project Approval," and FWRC 19.115, "Community Design Guidelines." Proposed action is for construction of a 9,126 square -foot, one-story church building, and associated site improvements on a RM3600-zoned lot developed with an existing single family home. The project is subject to a Hearing Examiner Process IV decision. DESIGN APPROVAL ISSUANCE AND EFFECT The Community Design Guidelines components of the project are hereby approved pursuant to decision criteria set forth in FWRC 19.115. This decision is also based, in part, on the conclusions drawn from the Statement of Facts (Exhibit A) issued by the Planning Division and site, landscaping, and elevation plans (Exhibit B) prepared by Kirkman Associates, and Olympic Landscape and Irrigation Co., stamped "Approved" on December 17, 2012. This decision does not take effect unless and until the Hearing Examiner issues Process IV approval and it does not authorize the applicant to conduct any development activities on the site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL None STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11-340, the city's Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on April 6, 2012. Three comments were received by neighboring property owners and these comments were forwarded on to the applicant for consideration in the proposed site design. No SEPA appeals were filed. File #11-105157-00-UP Doc. ID 62287 Mr. Don R. Kirkman Page 2 of 2 December 17, 2012 REQUESTS FOR CHANGE OF VALUATION Any affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes, not withstanding any program of revaluation. APPEALS •:; .9 -,_... Pursuant to FWRC 1 65.1 this ecision may be appealed by the applicant, anyone who submitted comments, or anyone who has specItical ly requested the decision. The appeal must be filed in writing with the City Clerk within 14 calendar days of the issuance date of the decision and must include the following: a statement identifying the decision being appealed; a copy of the decision; a statement of the alleged errors in the decision (including identification of specific factual findings and conclusions of the decision being disputed); the appellant's name, address, and telephone number; and the applicable appeal fee. Any appeal of this decision will be heard by the Federal Way Hearing Examiner concurrently with the Process IV hearing associated with the application. CLOSING Information used in preparing the design decision such as drawings, specifications, and details are available upon request during normal business hours at the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8ch Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). Copies of specific information may also be obtained by written request to the City Clerk at the above -referenced address. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Senior Planner Janet Shull at ianet.shull(a.ci offederalwa .corn, or 253-835-2644. Sincerely, Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director enc: Exhibit A, Statement of Facts Exhibit B, Approved Site, Landscaping, & Elevation Plans Prepared by Kirkman and Associates, LLC and Olympic Landscape and Irrigation Co. c: Janet Shull, Senior Planner Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Engineer Barry and Charlene Turnbull; 33355 20"' Avenue South; Federal Way, WA 98003 Albin and Shirley Gulbraa; 33357 201h Avenue South; Federal Way, WA 98003 Tamara King: 2100 South 33e Street, #R6; Federal Way, WA 98003 KC, AF;,, CSSW Ci2•11•{7,] File #11-105157-00-UP Doc. I.D. 62287 CITY OF Federal Way EXHIBIT A STATEMENT OF FACTS Federal Way ni ev&ed Code Chapter 19�115,-"CQ>rnmunity Design Guidelines" Russian SDA Church, File 11-105157-UP The Planning Division hereby presents the following statement of facts to the Director of Community Development pursuant to content requirements of the Community Design Guidelines decision as set forth in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.65.100(4). 1. Proposal — The applicant, Don R. Kirkman of Kirkman Associates, LLC, has proposed a church development on a RM3600 multifamily -zoned parcel approximately 1.27 acres in size. The proposal consists of a one-story, 9,126 square -foot church building with parking, landscaping, and stormwater improvements. 2. Requested Decision — The applicant submitted a Process IV Hearing Examiner Master Land Use (MLU) application on December 30, 2011. Prior to the Hearing Examiner's Process IV decision, the Director of Community Development Services shall issue a design decision pursuant to FWRC 19.65. 1 00(b)(ii). 3. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) — The applicant submitted a CPTED checklist as a component of the Process IV MLU application. Staff finds the applicant has met the intent of CPTED and provides measures that include, but are not limited to: natural surveillance; site and building layout; landscaping; lighting; and entrance visibility. 4. Site Design — Pursuant to FWRC 19.115.050, project designers shall strive for overall design continuity by using similar elements throughout the project and addressing the following items: (a) pedestrian areas, amenities, and circulation; (b) surface parking lot; (c) garbage and recycling receptacles, placement, and screening; and (d) lighting. Staff finds the applicant has met the intent of the chapter's site design standards and analysis of each item is provided below: a. Pedestrian Areas, Amenities, and Circulation — The proposed improvements provide outdoor seating located in a 256 square -foot lighted pedestrian plaza at the southwest corner of the building. The plaza is adjacent to a pedestrian connection to the South 336"' Street right-of-way. All pathways are clearly delineated. A bicycle rack is provided at the northeast corner, adjacent to the main building entrance, to promote alternative transportation modes. Statement of Facts Page 1 of 4 Russian SDA Church File #11-105157-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 62290 b. Surface Parking Lot— Access to the parking area will be provided via private driveways accessing the site from South 3Vh Street to the south and 2V' Avenue South to the eist. Loop access is provided inside the parking area. Internal lot landscaping will be provided within islands and bulb -outs at a ratio of 22 square feet per stall. Fifteen -foot wide perimeter landscaping will be provided along the north and west property lines screening the parking area from adjacent residential development. In addition, a six-foot tall wood fence will be provided along the north property line. A sight -obscuring fence already exists along the west property line. The adjacent property to the west also has densely planted trees along this property line. c. Garbage and Recycling Receptacles —The garbage and recycling enclosure materials will consist of a sight obscuring six-foot tall wood fence. Trees, shrubs, and groundcover will abut theF enclosure -walls to provide further screening. d. Lighting— The parking area and pedestrian areas surrounding the church building will be illuminated via 12 lighting standards with full cutoff shields meeting "nighttime friendly criteria" with 20-foot poles. The pedestrian plaza will contain four bollard style lighting fixtures approximately 48 inches in height. 5. Building Design — As the proposed, improvements will contain fagades longer than 60 feet that will be visible from a right-of-way, and the building is subject to facade treatment and articulation requirements pursuant to FWRC 19.115.060(2). Staff finds the applicant has met the intent of the chapter's building design standards and analysis of each item is provided below: a. Fagade Modulation and Screening Options —The applicant has utilized all four modulation and screening options on various elevations. FWRC 19.115.060(2) allows flexibility when applying dimensional standards of the four options if more than the minimum are incorporated. Staff provides analysis for each elevation. i. North Elevation — (1) Four modulations meeting minimum depth and maximum width have been provided; (2) a canopy and entrance portico is incorporated into the north facade; and (3) partial credit is given for use of foundation landscaping as it does not meet the minimum depth to receive full credit as a modulation option. Three of the four options have been incorporated. ii. East Elevation — (1) Two modulations meeting minimum depth and maximum width have been provided; and (2) a 30-foot deep ornamental landscaping screen along the base of the east facade is provided. Two of the four options have been incorporated. iii. South Elevation — (1) Two modulations meeting minimum depth and maximum width have been provided; (2) ornamental landscaping 30 feet wide along the base of the south facade is provided; and (3) a plaza 256 square feet in area is incorporated into the landscaping along the south facade. Three of the four options have been incorporated. iv. West Elevation — (1) Four modulations meeting minimum depth and maximum width have been provided; (2) a plaza 256 square feet in area is incorporated into the landscaping along the west facade; and (3) partial credit is given for use of foundation landscaping as it does not meet the minimum depth to receive full credit as a modulation option. Three of the four options have been incorporated. Statement of Facts Page 2 of 4 Russian SDA Church File #11-105157-00-UP / Doe. I.D. 62290 b. Building Articulation and Scale — The project architect has provided exterior materials that include areas of stone veneer base with wainscoting, stucco, visible window trim, and large expanses of glazing. Rooflines are varied and metal shake roofing material is proposed. Multiple building setbacks, canopies, material variations, ornamental landscaping, and opportunities for outdoor gathering assist in providing a pedestrian scale to a building with two relatively long facades. 6. Building and Pedestrian Orientation — Both building entrances will be directly accessible from the adjacent right-of-way and are connected by pedestrian paths. The main building entrance is signified by a large portico easily visible from adjacent 20a Avenue South. The secondary entrance is visible from South 33e Street and also connected by a pedestrian path to the right of way. This entrance is --signified by apeaked-roofline over the entrydoor.--All facades incorporate--substantial-glazing.- Staff - finds the applicant has met the intent of building and pedestrian orientation pursuant to FWRC 19.115.070. 7. Institutional Uses — Pursuant to FWRC 19.115.100, institutional uses are required to implement specific district guidelines. The applicable guidelines are FWRC 19.115.090(1)(a), (b), (e), (0, (h), and (i). Staff finds the applicant has met the intent of specific district guidelines and provides italicized analysis following each provision: a. Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWRC 19.115.050(4). The building fronts on the corner of South 3361" Street and 200 Avenue South. Vehicle parking is located behind and besides the building. Pedestrian access) circulation is provided via two six -foot -wide pathways: one leadingfrom South 336'" Street and one leading from 200' Avenue South, that direct pedestrians to the building's north and west entrances. b. Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of-way; and shall incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. The north entrance is clearly recognizable from 20''' Avenue South and the west entrance fagade is clearly recognizable from South 336`"Street. The two entrances have incorporated glazing with visible trim and canopies. e. Ground -level mirrored or reflective glass is not allowed adjacent to a public right-of-way or pedestrian area. Applicant does not propose ground -level mirrored or reflective glass. f. If utilized, chain -link fences visible from public rights -of -way or adjacent properties, and not screened by Type I landscaping as defined by Chapter 19.125 FWRC, shall utilize vinyl -coated mesh, powder -coated poles, dark color(s), and architectural element(s) such as pole caps and/or decorative grid pattern. Applicant does notpropose chain-linkfencing. Statement of Facts Page 3 of 4 Russian SDA Church File #11-105157-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 62290 h. Parking lots should be broken up into rows containing no more than 10 adjacent stalls, separated by planting areas. As shown on the site plan, rows contain 10 or fewer adjacent stalls per row between planting areas. i. Pedestrian walkways (minimum six feet wide) shall be provided between the interior of the project and the public sidewalk. Two six -foot -wide pedestrian walkways provide connections from South 336`4 Street and 20`h Avenue South. 8. Decisional Criteria— The proposal is consistent with applicable Community Design Guideline decision criteria set forth in FWRC 19.65.100. As shown in analysis above, the proposal is consistent with site design standards set forth for institutional uses in FWRC 19.115.100. Final construction drawings will be reviewed for compliance with specific regulations, conditions of approval, and other applicable city requirements considered in the upcoming Process IV Hearing Examiner decision. These findings shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: Janet Shull, Senior Planner Date: December 13, 2012 Statement of Facts Page 4 of 4 Russian SDA Church File # 11-105157-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 62290 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner RE: Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church Process IV No. 11-1051157-00-UP FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION INTRODUCTION The Ukranian Parousia SDA Church requests approval of a Process IV permit for a 9,126 square foot church on a 1.26 acre parcel zoned RM 3600. The application is approved subject to conditions. ORAL TESTIMONY Janet Shull, senior City of Federal Way planner, summarized the proposal. Ms. Shull noted that there were three comments received on the Notice of Application/DNS. One comment was a concern by an adjoining property owner that proposed landscaping would grow so tall as to block sunlight into their backyard. The applicant has addressed this problem by replacing proposed trees with lower growing shrubs and low growing trees. The other comments concerned overflow parking. Although overflow parking is not anticipated to be a problem with the proposal, the applicant has acquired an agreement from the church across the street to use their parking lot for overflow parking. The applicant and church across the street have services at different times, which makes the agreement feasible. Subsequent to sending out the public hearing notice additional written comments were submitted, attached as Exhibit E to the staff report. She noted that S. 336"' is classified as a minor arterial and 20t' is classified as a minor collector. Ms.Shull noted that staff did have concerns about the aesthetics of the detention pond located along the east side of the church building. In order to obscure the pond from public view, the pond is separated from adjoining right of way by trees and shrubs. The Applicant has also provided for ten feet of landscaping beyond that required by the code for the detention pond, which provides for further visual buffering. Ms. Shull noted that the Applicant will be placing a fence along the northern property line. No fencing is proposed or required by code for the western property line. There is a fence along the western property line on the adjoining property to the west, but that fence is apparently falling down in some places. EXHIBITS See list of exhibits at page 9 of the January 22, 2013, staff report for the subject application. In addition, a hard copy of the PowerPoint presentation was introduced as Exhibit N. Process IV Decision -- 1 FINDINGS OF FACT Procedural: 1. Applicant. The applicant is the Ukranian Parousia SDA Church KACBC, represented by Don Kirkman . 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application at 2:00 p.m. at Federal Way City Hall on January 30, 2013. Substantive: 3. Proposal and Site Description. The Ukranian Parousia SDA Church requests approval of a Process IV permit for a 9,126 square foot church on a 1.26 acre parcel zoned RM 3600. The Parcel is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of S. 336th St. and 200' Ave s. S. 336`h St. is classified as a minor arterial and 20'h Ave. S. is classified as a minor collector. The proposal includes 83 parking spaces and a shared parking agreement with a church located across S. 336th St. for overflow harking. The building site is currently occupied by a single-family residence. 4. Characteristics of the Surrounding Area. The Christian Faith Center, a large church, is located across S. 336th St. to the south. Adjacent properties to the east, south and north are also zoned RM 3600. The adjoining lots are composed of a mix of single and multi -family residential. 5. Adverse Im 11actslAde uaci of Infrastructure. There are no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the proposal. Impacts are more specifically addressed as follows: a. Tragic and Parking. Traffic and parking impacts are fully mitigated. The City's public works department has reviewed the traffic impacts of the proposal and has determined that the proposal will not decrease the level of service for impacted arterials below adopted standards. The Applicant will also be required to pay traffic impact fees to pay for its proportionate share impacts to the City's road network. Parking is in compliance with adopted City parking standards and the Applicant has even gone beyond those standards by entering into an overflow parking agreement with a church Iocated south of S. 336" St. Most frontage improvements along S. 336th and 20th Ave. have already been constructed, with the exception of street trees and street lights along 20'', which will be required during building permit review. b. Fencing. One of the property owners in the vicinity has requested a white picket fence along the western property Iine. The only need for the fence apparent from the record is that the adjoining property owner has a wood fence along the western property line that is in disrepair and is unsightly. The Applicant cannot be constitutionally required to fix a problem caused by its neighbors. However, Process IV Decision -- 2 the request for the fence has been made a part of the hearing record and the applicant can voluntarily erect a picket fence if it so chooses. c. Stormwater. The applicant is required to meet the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the Federal Way Addendum to the manual. These comprehensive and detailed regulations require stormwater design that results in no increases of stormwater run-off and the preservation of water quality. Nothing in the record suggests that these regulations are inadequate to protect against stormwater impacts. d. Building Height. Some concerns were raised about potential building height. As noted in the staff report, the proposed building height is within the 30 foot height limit of the RM 3600 district. The height of the building is also compatible with the uses allowed and actually built in the surrounding RM 3600 district area. e. LandscapingrHeight. The applicant has reduced the height of proposed landscaping along the northern perimeter in order to allow for better passage of light to the adjoining northern property in owner in response to concerns of that property owners that evergreen trees and the like would create too much shading. f. Fire Protection. The South King County Fire and Rescue District is requiring the installation of a new fire hydrant in addition to the existing fire hydrant. The applicant will also be required to install an automatic fire sprinkler system in the new building. g. Noise. The City has noise standards in place designed to address the types of noise generated by churches. See Chapter 7.10 FWRC. There is nothing in the record to suggest that the proposal would create any unreasonable noises beyond those contemplated by the City Council when it determined that churches are an appropriate land use for the RM 3600 district. h. Detention Pond Aesthetics. As testified by Ms. Shull, the detention pond on -site will be obscured from adjoining roads by a significant amount of landscaping that exceeds code requirements. i. Water and Sewer. The City's water/sewer purveyor, the Lakehaven Utility District, has reviewed the proposal and found the water and sewer services to be adequate. j. Access. The proposed access points are optimally located and configured with due consideration for safety and efficiency. The subject property is adjacent to and has access points to a minor arterial (South 336th Street) and a minor collector (20th Avenue South) meeting the FWRC 19.205.100(3) requirement. Pedestrian access will be provided via six foot wide concrete walkways leading from both South 336th Street and 20th Avenue South to the church entrances. Staff have determined that the access points are optimal and have conducted a Sight Distance Analysis and Turn Lane Warrant Analysis to ensure safe and efficient traffic operation. Process IV Decision -- 3 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Procedural: 1. AuthorRy of Hearing Examiner: FWRC 19.200.050 requires Process IV approval for the construction of churches upon properties zoned for residential single family use. The Examiner has the authority to conduct hearings issue a final decisions on Process IV applications. Substantive: 2. Zonine DesiL-nation: RM 3600. 3. Review Criteria and Application. FWRC 19.70.15 governs the criteria for Process IV approvals. Those criteria are quoted in italics below and applied to the application under corresponding Conclusions of Law. All criteria have been satisfied for the reasons identified below. Process IV Criteria FWRC 19. 70.150(3) (a): [The project] is consistent with the comprehensive plan; 4. The Process IV request is determined to be consistent with the following goals and policies contained in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan: 2.5 Urban Design and Form; "Improve the appearance and function of the built environment" (Policy LUG 1). 5. The proposal will involve a significant amount of landscaping that exceeds City standards in order to improve the appearance of the built environment. The function of the built environment will be enhanced by the traffic, parking and stormwater improvements identified in Finding of Fact No. 5. 2.8 Land Use Designations; "Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent nonresidential uses" (Policy LUP15). 6. The improvements identified in Conclusion of Law No. 5 will serve to protect residential development from nonresidential impacts. 6.5 Capital Facilities Goals and Policies; "Provide the capital facilities needed to serve the future growth anticipated by the FWCP" (Policy CFP13). 7. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 5, there will be adequate capital facilities serving the proposal. Process IV Decision -- 4 FWRC 19.70.150(3)(b): [The project] is consistent with all applicable provisions of this title and all other applicable laws; 8. As noted at page 5 of the staff report, staff have verified that the project is consistent with all applicable development standards. The findings of staff listed in Section XI of the staff report are adopted in support of this finding as if set forth in full. FWRC 19.70.150(3)(c): [The project] is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; 9. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 5, there are no significant adverse impacts associated with the project. The proposal also provides for a community service. For these reasons, the project is consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. FWRC 19.70.150(3)(d): The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal; 10. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the proposal is served by adequate traffic, water and sewer facilities. FWRC 19.70.150(3)(e): The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access; 11. Proposed access is optimal as determined in Finding of Fact No. 50). DECISION The Process IV application is approved subject to the following condition. The applicant shall obtain engineering approval from the Public Works Department and commercial building approval from the Department of Community and Economic Development prior to site construction. Dated this 14t' day of January, 2013. Phi A. Qlbrcchrs Hearing Examiner, City of Federal Way FWRC 19 7170 -Appeals of the hearing examiner's decision to the City Council. This decision may be appealed to the City Council as follows: Process IV Decision -- 5 (1) Who may appeal. The decision of the hearing examiner, which is not the final decision of the city, may be appealed by the applicant, persons who submit written or oral comments to the hearing examiner, persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision, or by the city. (2) How and when to appeal. A written notice of appeal must be delivered to the department within 14 calendar days after issuance of the decision of the director. The appeal must be accompanied by cash or a check, payable to the city of Federal Way, in the amount of the fee as established by the city. The notice of appeal must contain: (a) A statement identifying the decision being appealed, along with a copy of the decision; (b) A statement of the alleged errors in the hearing examiner's decision, including specific factual findings and conclusions of the hearing examiner disputed by the person filing the appeal; and (c) The appellant's name, address, telephone number and fax number, and any other information to facilitate communications with the appellant. (3) Transcript. The appellant shall either pay an amount sufficient to cover the cost of preparing the written transcript of the hearing examiner hearing, at the cost of $16.00 per hour, or make separate arrangements to prepare the transcript from tapes of the hearing provided by the city, at appellant's sole cost. The prepared transcript shall be submitted to the city hearing examiner secretary for distribution no later than 20 days prior to the date of the hearing on appeal, and shall be accompanied by an affidavit or certification by the appellant as to the accuracy and completeness of the transcript. The cost of the transcript shall be refunded to the appellant if the appellant substantially prevails on appeal. The city council shall decide whether appellant substantially prevailed on appeal and that decision shall be final. The transcript refund shall be limited to actual costs of transcript preparation as follows: (a) City staff preparation. Hourly cost of preparation. (b) Appellant preparation from tapes. Actual costs as shown by certified receipt or other evidence sufficient to the city. (4) Jurisdiction. Appeals from the decision of the hearing examiner will be heard by city council. Process IV Decision -- 6 DECLARATION OF MAILING Process IV — Russian Ukranian Parousa Church 11-105157-00-UP I, Phil Olbrechts, make the following declaration: 1. I am a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 18 years, not a party to this action, and competent to be a witness herein. 2. On the 14th day of February, 2013, I mailed, via First Class U.S. Mail, a true and correct copy of the FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION the above captioned matter to the following: Don Kirkman PO Box 816 Auburn, WA 98071 Albin and Shirley Gulbraa 33357 20`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Tamara King 2100 South 336`h Street, #R6 Federal Way, WA 98003 Gary Robertson 2100 South 336'h Street, #G-1 Federal Way WA 98003-8967 Barry and Charlene Turnbull 33355 2e Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. EXECUTED at Granite Falls, Washington, this 20th day of February, 2013. P0 A.Olbrechts a Federal Way NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at 2:00 p.m., or soon therealter, on Wednesday, Janu- ary X 2013, in the Federal Way City Council Chambers, 33325 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA. Project Name/File Number: Russian Ukranian Parsousia S➢A Church / 11.105157-00•UP Requested Decision and Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Process IV "Hearing Examiner" decision pursuant to Federal Way Re- vised Code Chapter 19.70. The applicant proposes church facility improvements that include a new 9,120 square -foot sanctuary building, 83-stall parking area, stormwater facilities, and landscap- ing. Site work will require the demolition of an ex- isting single family home to accommodate Pro- posed improvements. Applicant: Don Kirkman, P.C. Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Project Location: 1869 South 336M Street, Feder- al Way, WA 98003 Hate Application Received: December 30, 2011 Date Oetermined Complete: January 25, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: January 27, 2012 Permits Required by this Application: Process IV ,Hearing Examiner' (File 11-105I57-UP); Environ- mental Threshold Determination (File 12-100185- SE); and Traffic Coneurrency (File 11-105158.ON). Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Review: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, 'Environmental Policy': Title 16, 'Surface Water Management': Title 19, 'toning and Development Code.' Public Comments and Appeals: Any person may submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner by delivering. these. comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Any person may provide verbal comments during the hearing and/or request a copy of the decision. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or pro- vide verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specitically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the land use decision. Details of appeal procedures will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file and ex- isting environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community and Economic Development Depart- ment, 33325 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. stall Contact: Senior Planner Janet Shull„AICP, 253-835-2644 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on January 11, 2013. FWM 1969 uJ� (q &q J01M&OXY ► r/ 2013 31919 1,' Ave S, Suite 101 1 Federal, Way, WA 98003 1253.925.5565 1253.925.5750 (f) Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way - Economic Development as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive weeks(s), commencing on the 1 1 th day of .1anuary 2013, and ending on the 1 1 th day of January 2013, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its reader's during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $1 15.36, which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65. 16.020. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 1 st day of February 2013. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way 0 CD CD o� a CD n ' 0 C) 0 0 CD CD o �a CD 0 � � a �$C-D� CD CD CD S�s 0 F�CD �0 CD CD aro can w' a a A 0 w o o 0 0 0 'o w CD 0 CD, ,r o 0Q O n CD r3',.e oCD CD CDo y CD o� 0 O C� C �'• 0 C n P� CD � O � O .y M 0 O O N � CAD w 0 C' CD y o r-i A _s c C vl W tN s � O r Uy3 3© x � ►Z p% CD Owe aq o owe �P' x . A-M �.... knu5P- RECEIVED- DEC 3 0 2011 ClTv OF FEDERAL. WAY ADS Noto its RaN W-1 To se-4 E . CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 6, 2012 TO: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Development Services • Traffic Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Becky Chapin DRC MTG ON: January 19, 2012, Completeness and Internal Review FILE NUMBER(s) : 11-105157-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: 11-102101-00-PC PROJECT NAME: Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church PROJECT ADDRESS: 1860 South 336th Street ZONING DISTRICT: RM 3600 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to redevelop an existing parcel with a mobile home into a 9,120 sf church. Additional improvements include parking to accommodate 265 vehicles, stormwater treatment/flow control, and landscaping. LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT: Process IV with SEPA Don Kirkman PO BOX 816 Auburn, WA 98071 MTERIALS SUBMITTED: *NOTE: Incomplete application at this point. Still waiting on CPTED checklist to be submitted and SEPA payment. • Master Land Use • Process IV submittal requirements checklist • Color Board ■ Site Photos (8) • Narrative (8) • SEPA Environmental Checklist (8) • Title Report (2) • Transportation Management Plan (5) • Downstream Analysis, Rupert Engineering (4) • Stormwater Plan, Rupert Engineering (4) • Index of Drawings (8) • Photometric Plan Exterior Lighting (4) • Site Plan (8) ■ Civil Plan Set (6) • Architect Site Plan Sheet (8) • Landscaping Plan Set (8) �•� RECEIVED DrPARTMErrr OF Conr�suxrrr DFV M F��5 VCs CI?Y OF v � 325 8 Avenue South Federal WayDEc 30 2u;, Fedcral Way WAP98B63 9718 �53.835-�547;Fax 253. 9718 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 835-2609 w►vw_ci a#%deraiwa ,gym CDs APPLICATION No(s) —M 5 —11 V �S : �/,� Q I -SE ,Date / G- Date 12/29/2011 Project Name Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church Property Address/Location 1860 S. 336th St., Federal Way, WA 98003 Parcel Number(s) 7978200100 Project Description PLEASE PRINT . type VA fire sprinkled construction, 9120 sq. ft wood frame, stucco exterior Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director--s Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) X Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information RM3600 Zoning Designation multi—famib6mprehensive Plan Designation —Value of Existing Improvements 1 _ 1 millioz�alue of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): A-3 Occupancy Type VA sprinklered Construction Type Applicant Name: Don R. Kirkman Address: PO Box 816 City/State: Auburn, WA Zip: 98071 Phone: 253-833-7910 Fax: 253-833-7915 Email: kirkmand@nverlture.com Signature: 7�� Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: same Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: Western WA Corp of SDA Address: 32229 Weyerheauser Ave. S City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98001 Phone: 253-681-6008 Fax: 253--681-6009 Email: re? e f lquist@wc.npus.org Signatu lulletin tt003 —August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Mastcr Land Use Application co 0 L- co 0- cu .C: cu L- 4-1 cM L O U) O CD co T- N 211 M Co M C O (a `+T +� O L O [6 .� U Q U O '� O) C O u)' CL O ti cn ,« M C M C N N c c . U 0 LO O M 0 O O> cu c 0 ) OO U Q O) OE Y a N -a to � 0-0 S Q (C0 C � A mU m :3 O f o 11 acc w c o � c � @ H C7 Em N [p � i4^ C) soa �E-0m O ti CLT.4 z 0062 a I KIRKMA N ASSOCIATES, ILILCC P.O. BOX 816 • AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98071-0816 • (253) 833-7910 • FAX (253) 833-7915 kirkmand@nventure.com November 8, 2012 City of Federal Way Dept. of Community & Development Services 33325 8" Ave. So. Federal Way, WA 98063 Re: Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church 11-105157-00-UP 1860 S. 336th St. Public Works Second Review Dear Janet Shull, REUBA11T .E® Nov 0 9 2012 CTry OF CAS RAL WAy Regarding the memo dated August 14, 2012 we are responding to the requirements notes as follows: FROM: Ann Dower Technical Information Re ❑rT Although storm water sizing calculations are not thoroughly reviewed under the land use application, in going back through the original TIR, I noticed a sheet in the calculations that suggests the engineer may have used existing site conditions rather than historic site conditions for the pre -developed condition (p.1-40, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Historic site conditions are assumed to be completely forested (p.1-3, 2009 KCSWDM). This may affect the design and size of the storm water facilities. Please explain the calculations provided or provide revised calculations. In either case, include a screen shot or printout of the land use types entered into KCRTS. Response: The stormwater plan calculations have been revised and submitted in the enclosed Nov. 3, 2012 "Russian Ukranian Paraousia SDA Church Stormwater Plan" and on the C3 Drainage Sheet dated 11/5/12. Hopefully this response will satisfy the requirements on this memo. Thank you again, Janet for your assistance. Sincerely, a""6 ", Don R. Kirkman 2606CFWAD KERKMAN ASSOCIATES, ILILCC P.O. BOX 816 • AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98071-0816 • (253) 833-7910 • FAX (253) 833-7915 kirkmand@nventure.com September 11, 2012 City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services 33325 81h Ave. South Federal Way, WA 98003 Attention: Janet Shull Senior Planner Re: File #11-145157-0U-Up; PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church; 1860 South 336t'' Street, Federal Way Dear Janet: Here is the response to the July 18, 2012 review of the Process IV land use application. Thanks for your assistance in getting through this process for this project. The items will be address one by one in our response. TECHNICAL COMMENTS/REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative noted below. Janet Shull, Planning Division, 253-835-2644, janet,shull@catyof ederalway.eom While Planning staff finds the overall design concept in accordance with many of the city's development regulations applicable to church uses; some corrections and/or additional information is requested prior to scheduling a public hearing and issuing a determination on the Community Design Guidelines component of the Process IV application. I. Landscaping a. Modification Request— The July 18, 2012, resubmittal included a request for a landscape modification for the following: ■ To allow for smaller trees and tall shrubs in lieu of standard Type III landscaping along the north property line in response to neighbors' comments about possible shade and view reduction due to large trees; and • To allow for partial placement of storm drainage facilities (biofiltration swale/ engineered wetland) within the required perimeter landscaping along the South 320'b and 20`b Avenue South frontages. With the modifications to the landscape plans detailed below and indicated on enclosed redlined Sheets L1 and L2, the modification request satisfies the criteria of Federa� (FWRC) 19.125.100. 9 �fAVrl*ED File #1 1-105157-00-Up SEP 14 2012 ❑oc-1A 61974 Cm OF FEOERAI. WAY CDS Response: See Sheet L-1 and A1.02 revised per red lined plans Lire enclosed. b. Dimensions — There is still one parking lot landscape island at the north side of the building that is not dimensioned (see redlined Sheet U). Response: See Sheet L-1 and A1.02 The missing dimension on the red lined landscape island has been added to these sheets, c. Tree Retention Standards — The landscape plan has been revised to indicate that the tree units per acre standard is met. We would like to note that you actually get 2.5 tree unit credits for each of the 20❑ caliper Doug Fir trees retained. While not required, as you clearly meet the minimum standard, you may wish to revise sheet L2 of 2 to correct the credit amount and calculation. Response: See Sheet L-2 revised as suggested. d. Proposed Plantings — Each of the required Iandscape planting areas must include trees, shrubs, and groundcover throughout the planting bed. Some of the proposed parking lot landscape islands include only two of the three plant types. Each landscape island must have at least one tree. See redlined sheet Ll for landscape islands that need to Have trees, shrubs, and/or groundcover added. Response: See sheet L-1 revised as per Redline request. Neighbors to the north of the site wrote letters to express concern with possible shading, leaf drop, and potential loss of view. The resubmitted landscape plans have eliminated the 20 to 30- foot tall trees in response to the. neighbors' concerns. While the proposed plantings appear to meet the neighbors' concerns in terms of mature height, the initial plantings should be at least Meet tall to provide adequate screening of vehicle headlights and better noise reduction properties from the time of initial planting. Please update the plant lists on sheet L2 to specify larger sixes for plant material along the north property line. On the Plant List, please correctly show the symbol for " PF" Potentilla fruticosa—the symbol on the plans does not correlate with the symbol on the key on sheet L2/2. Response: See Sheet L-2 Response to Neighbors to north: the plant Iist has been revised to specify larger sized plants and as requested. The proposed plantings along South 3201b Street and 20`n Avenue South are subject to a modification request as noted above. The total planted area is 30 feet in depth inclusive of the storm drainage facility, which is sufficient to meet the intent of the required 20-foot buffer area as long as the planting specified also meets the intent of the required Type M "Visual Suffer,, standard. In order to meet the intent of the Type III landscaping buffer requirement, additional trees must be added as noted on redlined Sheet M. Per Type III landscape requirements, the trees must be a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees. Response: See Sheet L-1. The proposed planting along South 320"' Street and 20`h Ave. South. Trees were added as per Redline drawing, and according to Type III Landscape requirements. U. Administrative Design Guidelines Facade Treatment — All building facades exceed 60 feet. Per resubmittal, all now meet facade treatment standards as follows: File 911-105157-00-UP Dee. I D 61874 North Facade: building fagade modulation and canopy plus partial credit for foundation landscaping South Facade: building facade modulation, plaza, and landscape screening East Facade: building fagade modulation and Iandscape screening West Facade: building fagade modulation and plaza. While the plaza is allowed within the 30-foot building setback area, the proposed structure over the plaza is not allowed within the building setback area and roust be deleted from the plans. Benches, seating, lighting, and other pedestrian amenities are allowed and encouraged within the Proposed plaza area. Response: See Sheets A1.02 and A7.01 The roof structure has been removed and deleted from the plaza as requested. HL Garbage & Recycling The plans indicate that a garbage and recycling enclosure is being provided within landscaping area adjacent to the parking lot. The resubmitted plans were routed to Waste Management for review and comment. Waste Management has indicated that they will drive into the site to access the garbage and recycling enclosure. To better accommodate garbage and recycling collection, the gate to the enclosure should be enlarged as indicated on the redlined Sheet Li. Response: See Sheet A1.02 As requested a larger gate door has been changed on the garbage and recycling collection fence enclosure. Two 3' doors have been added providing a 6' opening. Ann Dower, PW Development Services Division, 253-835-2732, ann-dower@cityoffederalway.com See the enclosed memorandum for Public Works Development Services Division comments. Sarady Long, PW Traffic Division, 253-835-2743, sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com See the enclosed Public Works Traffic Division memorandum for comments. APPLICATION STATUS Pursuant to the FWRC development regulations, city departments and the Hearing Examiner are allotted 120 days to review and endeavor a decision on the Process IV application. Any period in which the applicant has been requested to correct plans or provide additional information is excluded from the 120- day period. As of today, the review period has stopped with 75 days used. The review period will commence within 14 days of a resubmittal of items requested/corrected. Response: 'Thanks for this information. CLOSING When resubmitting requested information, please provide four copies of any reports and six copies of any Plans, in addition to the green resubmitta] form. Pursuant to FWRC 19-15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. File #I1-105157-00-Up Doe. I.D. 61874 If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2644, orjanet.shull@cityoffederalway.com. Response: Understood and thanks, Sincerely, Don R. Kirkman Architect File #11-105157-00-Up Doc. LD. 61874 K HRKdV AN r S S ®CEATES , 1L L lC P.O. BOX 816 • AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98071-0816 • (253) 833-7910 • FAX (253) 833-7915 kirkmand@nventure.com July 17, 2012 City of Federal Way Community Development Dept. 33325 8`h Ave. So. Federal Way WA 98003-6325 RE: File #11-105157-00-UP; RUSSIAN UKRANIANPAROUSIA SDA CHURCH 1860 South 336 thShw Federal Way Dear Janet Shull: RESUBMITTED JUL 18 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS In response to your review of March 28, 2012, we are submitting the following comments and the drawings that correspond. (See enclosed Resubmittal Form) Thanks again for your helpfulness as we work through this process. The City's Development Review Committee (DRC) is currently reviewing the above -referenced Process IV land use application and corresponding State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist. The proposed site development includes a new 9,120 square -foot church/sanctuary building, stormwater detention pond, parking accommodations, and landscaping. Theapplication was deemed complete January 25, 2012, and a Notice of Application (NOA)/Optional DNS was given January 26,2012. Members of the DRC have provided comments below. In addition, the city received three comment letters during the 15- day comment period for the NOA/Optional DNS. These letters are included for your reference and response to the concerns raised. Response: Thanks you. TECHNICAL COMMENTS/REQ UEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative n oted below. Janet Shull, Planning Division, 253-835-2644, janet.shull@cityoffederalway.com While Planning staff finds the overall design concept in accordance with many of the City's development regulations applicable to church uses: some corrections and/or additional information is requested prior to scheduling a public hearing and issuing a determination on the Community Design Guidelines component of the Process IV application. I. Site Plan a. Parking — The parking layout shows three locations (both sides of landscape area "b" and al on g the west side of the building) where there are more than 10 contiguous stalls without a landscape island (reference FWRC 19.115.090(1)(h)). The parking layout must be revised so that there are not more than 10 contiguous parking stalls between landscape islands. Parking stalls and parking lot drive aisles must also be dimensioned. Response: See Sheets A1.01 revised and A1.02 , new sheet. & L-1 Revised Parking has been revised so there are no more than 10 contiguous parking stalls between landscape islands. Parking stalls have been dimensioned. 11 105117 ]an;. 1.1) 60666 b. Setbacks - Parking may be located no closer than 15 feet from side and rear property lines. The site plan indicates that the parking lot is only 10 feet from the west property line. This distance needs to be increased to 15 feet. Response: See Sheets A1.01 and A1.02, 15 foot setbacks have been provided from the property line for parking. II. Landscaping a. Dimensions - The landscape plan must include dimensions to indicate the required setbacks and dimensions of the planted areas. The landscape islands at the ends of parking rows must be at least 6 feet wide. Response: See L-1 Revised. b. Tree Retention ,Standards -The city requires each development/redevelopment to rrtsiniain specific tree canopy coverage depending on the lot size and zoning designation. This coverage is measured via tree credits that are assigned to existing and replacement trees. The minimum tree coverage requirements far Multi- Famiiy Residential zones are 30 tree units per acre; therefore, the subject property's density requirement would. be 39 tree units (30 tree units x 1.3 acres). See the tree unit credit chart below for further details. Table 19.120.130-2 -Tree Unit Credits =Tree ry Tree Unit�Credit� .b.h. 1.0 tree units per tree retained Existing Tree > 6" to 12" d.b.h. 11tree units per tree tained Existing Tree > 12" to 18" d.b.h. 2.0 tree units per tree retained Existing Tree > 18" to 24" d.b.h. 25 tree units per tree retained Existing Tree > 24" d.b.h. 3.0 tree units per tree retained Replacement Tree Category Small Canopy Species (Mature canopy area < 450 .50 tree units per tree SF) planted Medium Canopy Species (Mature canopy area 450 1.0 tree units per tree to 1,250 SF) planted Large Canopy Species (Mature canopy area > 1.5 tree units per tree 1, 250 SF) planted The landscape plan must show how retention and/or replacement of tree units on the subject property meet the minimum density requirement (39 tree units). If the applicant is unable to provide the minimum required tree units per acre on :site; off -site mitigation or a fee-i n-lieu payment into the City's urban forestry account may be approved by the Director of Community and Economic Development. Please refer to FWRC 19.120.140 for off -site mitigation and fee- in -lieu options. Response: See L-2 The tree calculations are shown on revised plan. C. Proposed Plantings -Each of the required landscape planting areas must include trees, shrubs, and groundcover II losiv throughout the planting bed. Some of the proposed parking lot landscape islands include only two of the three 111, 1.1) 60666 Plant types. Each landscape island must have at least one tree. No plant material greater than 12 inches in height shall be located within two feet of a curb March 28. 2012 Page 3 or other protective barrier in landscape areas adjacent to parking spaces. Please review proposed parking lot plantings, as it appears some parking lot landscaping (in particular the planter bed located where there is head to head parking) has species that will potentially grow 4 to 6 feet tall and spread so as to conflict with vehicle overhang and access. Neighbors to the north of the site wrote letters to express concern with possible shading, leaf drop, and potential loss of view (see enclosed letters). The proposed landscaping indicates a series of evergreens that could grow 20-30 feet tall along the north property line. Given the comments of the neighbors to the north, the city would consider a request to modify the typical Type Ill landscape standard to allow for a mix of plantingslfencing that would better satisfy the neighbors' concerns for sun access to their yards. Reference FWRC 19.125.100 for modification option. Response: See Sheet L-1 and L-2 Revised. The plan has been revised to include all plant groups: No plants over 12" are at the edges: a modification of landscape along north buffer deleted trees per neighborhood. d. Biofiltration Swale/Retention Pond -The landscape plan indicates that the biofiltration swale is being included in the required perimeter landscaping along South 3 3 6 `h and 20 `h Avenue South This is allowable only through a request for modification as outlined in the preceding paragraph. While the facility along the south side of the building appears to be a biofiltration swale which within the required landscape area via a request for may be aIIowed landscape modification, the portion along the eastern side of the building appears to be a retention pond with a depth of up to $ feet. There is a rockery incorporated into the design of the stormwater facility. The civil drawings indicate the rockery is up to $ feet in height. Rockeries are limited to 6 feet in height in detention and retention ponds. The portion of the facility along the eastern side of the building will need to be revised to reduce the height of the rockery and ensure that the facility can be integrated into the proposed landscaping so as to meet the intent of the perimeter Iandscape treatment. Response: See Sheet L-2 and Sheet C-4, Section B, Storm wetland Section. The retention pond has been redesigned so that the rockery will not exceed 6'. This has been accomplished by installation of a deeper building footing and Iowering the existing grade along this side of the building. The plan calls for this as a landscape modification: modification area shown on Lr2 li L Administrative Design Guidelines a. F"cude Treatment — All building facades exceed 60 feet. The south and east facades meet the requirements of FWRC 19.115.060(2)(a-d) by incorporating both facade modulation and landscape screening (see below). It is not clear from the elevations and plans submitted that the north and west facade treatments into orate at least two of the follow] four methods. It appears that the north facade could potentially get credit for a Pedestrian Plaza (see number 4 below). The plans and elevations must be revised to clearly indicate how the north and west facades meet minimum facade treatment standards. In addition, please correct the elevation titles on the Elevation plan sheets. 11 105117 Qic LD 60666 Response: See revised Sheets A I.02 Site Plan, A3.01 Exterior Elevations and A2.00 Enlarged Plan and floor plan. On the west elevation a 2 foot modulation has been added and a pedestrian plaza of 256 sq. ft. and on the north elevation a 2 ft modulation and also a covered porch entry with 672 square ft. 1. Facade Modulation —A minimum depth of two feet, minimum width of six feet, and maximum width of 60 feet. Alternative methods to shape a building such as angled or curved facade elements, offset planes, wing walls, and terracing will be considered, provided that the intent of the section is met. Response: See Sheets A3.01 and A3.02 This option has been used on west, north, south and east facades. 2. Landscape Screening — Eight -foot -wide Type 11 landscape screening along the base of the facade, except TYPe 1V may be used in place of Type 1I for facades that are comprised of 50 percent or more window area, and around building entrances. With the current building placement, the required buffer landscaping abutting 2ri"Avenue South and South 336" Street may be considered in meeting this requirement. To utilize this option, an increase to a Type 11 landscaping in a portion of the Type III required bgjj`er planting may be necessary. Response: See Sheet L1 .This has been used on the east and south facades. 3. Cano ar Arcade — As a modulation option. canopies or arcades may be used only along facades that are visible from a right-of-way. Minimum length is 50 percent of the length of the facade using this option. As Proposed, it appears all four facades would be visible from the right-of-way. Response: See Sheet A 3.02, A3.01 . This canopy is used on the north fagade. 4. Pedestrian Plaza -Plaza square footage is equal to one percent of the gross floor area of the building, but it trust be a minimum of200 square feet. The plaza should be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. The optimum location for a pedestrian plaza, should you choose this option, would be on the coaster gj2d" Avenue South and South 336"'Street and may be credited with treatments to the east and south facades. Response: See Sheet A1.02, A2.00 Pedestrian Plaza is shown on west fagade. b. FWRC 19.115.090(1 )(i) requires pedestrian walkways from the right-of-way to measure six feet in width. Please revise the twa walkwa s on the north and west sides of the build;_ footprint to reflect this requirement. Response: See Sheet A 1.02, Pedestrian walkways from the right —of-ways are revised to six feet in width. C. FWRC 19.115.050(1)(b) and 19.1I5.050(4)(e) specify that pedestrian amenities should be incorporated into the site design. Please indicate proposed site furniture including, but not limited to: outdoor seat;_ , trash reee tacies. and !; htin , The City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan identifies South 336th Street as a corridor with existing and proposed future bike lanes. Staff suggests the tacement of a bic cle rack in a pedestrian area to encourage additional transportation options for youth groups and church staff to utilize during hours of church operation. 105J17Response: Pedestrian amenities incorporated into the site plan design would be the pedestrian plaza with Dnc 1.1) 60666 outdoor seating and lighting on the 336St. frontage, a bicycle rack located on the 20tb Ave So. entrance walkway. The pedestrian plaza will have a trash receptacle. The parking area around the building meets the required foot-candles illuminaEtion as required and shown on the parking lot photometric plan. IV. Lighting No information on proposed site lighting was included with the plans. Please indicate site lighting on a site plan with typical lighting pole and fixture detail that will be used in the parking lot and pedestrian circulation areas. The recommended Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) minimum outdoor light levels as required by the city's CPTED policy is a minimum average maintained foot-candles of I fe in parking areas and 0.2fc for commercial pedestrian ways. The poles should not be taller than 20 feet and shall include cutoff shields. Response: See Sheet EP-1, photometric lighting plan enclosed shows foot-candle illumination, and lighting poles Shown which will be 20' or lower. V. Garbage & Recycling The glans indicate that a garbage and recycling enclosure is being provided inside of the building. Please submit more details indicating the size of the enclosure and how it will be accessed for collection. An area with a minimum of 65 square feet must be available for recycling. Response: See Sheet A1.02, a garbage and recycling enclosure has been provided as shown on the northwest corner of the parking lot. The enclosure will be 12' x 12' with a 6' wood fence. Vt. Parking Stall Count —The Parking requirements table on Sheet A1.01 indicates a total of 265 stalls, but the parking provided in the table adds up to 87. Please correct the table. Response: See Sheet C-1, Parking Requirements. The parking stall count has been revised and corrected. Ann Dower, Dev. Services Division, 253-835-2732, ann.dower@061yoffederalway.com Public Works has reviewed the December 30, 20 II submittal. Prior to Land Use Approval, the following Technical Review comments shall be addressed: a. Storm Water -The site is 55,402 square feet and the project will result in 37,650 square feet of impervious area, which is 67% impervious surface coverage. Therefore, section 5.2.1.3 of the 2009 KCSWDM applies. Please show proposed BMPs and a perforated pipe connection between roof downspouts and drainage system. Response: See Sheet C3. Perforated roof downspout lines and an infiltration trenched detail has been added to the plans as requested. The downstream analysis must extend at least Y4mlle downstream. Clarify how far this study extends. In addition, evaluate the upstream drain age for any flooding or erosion impacts that might occur as a result of the project. Response: See enclosed `Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church Downsteam Analysis" Rev. 1 7/12/20I2 by Rupert Engineering. The narrative and map have been added to show a quarter mile downstream. Narrative was also added for the upstream, b. Landscape Plans — Malus "Adams" or "Robinson" may be used as street trees. "Snowdrift" is not an approved variety. Response: See L-1, L-2. Malus has been changed to `Robinson'. 11 101117 ale 1-1) 60666 C. Streetlights -Streetlights are required for this project. Design does not need to occur at this point, but they should be shown conceptually on the site plan. Response: See Sheets C3 and C5. One street light and details have been added to show the requested light on 20'h Ave. Sarady Long, Traffic Division, 253-835-2743, sarady.long(i cityoffederalway.com The Public Works Traffic Division has reviewed the submitted material and provides the following technical comments: • The submitted sight distance analysis depicted adequate sight line for full access onto South 336th Street; however, the driveway is located within the eastbound left turn pocket. Staff is supportive in allowing full access and will restrict this driveway to right -in and right -out at such time it's deems necessary for safety. Response: Thank you. Transportation Management Plan • The submitted transportation management plan is not adequate to address traffic impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The TMP should be revised to include the following information. I .Parking demands using ITE 85 percentile and number of stalls provided. Response: Per planning ITE Ave. peak parking stall values will be used for this project. 2. Uses on site, days and hours of uses (schedules of services) including number of people. Response: See enclosed `Transportation Management Plan' Rev. 7/12/2012_ Rupert Engineering, Inc, Chart has been added showing anticipated parking and occupancy during the hours of the week. 3. Peak parking demands for the site including any special event. Response: An estimated worst case special event calculation has been done with overflow parking at Life care Centers of America N.W. Regional Offtee'14 of a mile west on 336"', The Corporate Headquarters which basically has no business on Saturdays or weekends. The address is 33528 5th Ave. S. Federal Way, WA 98003-6335.They have a 40 car parking lot that is not used on weekends when the special events would occur at the church. The owner of the property is a member of the SDA church also. 4. Traffic circulation and potential queuing issue that may impact adjacent street. Response: See revised 'Transportation Management Plan' 7/12/2012. Queue calculations For Ieft turn into the parking lot have been done. A queue length of 2 cars for a left turn movement is good for 60 left turnoff 20`�' Ave are anticipated for this site. turns movements per hour. Only 23 left 5. Parking overflow during special event, if any. Response: See same response as for question 3. 19 overflow stalls are needed. 40 are available. Citizen Comments Received during the Public Notice Period Two comment letters and one e-mail comment were received from this commentlettets/e W mail residents on neighboring properties. We are enclosing for your consideration and response. In your resubmittal, please respond to the comments. it should be noted that with regard to the concerns about tall evergreen trees along the south property line, the city will 11 105117 a,L, LU, 01666 entertain a request for a landscape modification to address this concern as the typical landscape requirement includes evergreen trees. The issues/concerns raised in the comment letters are summarized as follows: Landscaping and Fencing Residents on the two lots to the north had concerns about excessive shading and view blockage. Resident on the NW comer lot requested low picket fence si milar to the one at the neighboring townhome project. Resident on the NE corner lot requested 6-foot chain link with slat:; to block vehicle lights. (See rn ss in Section II above regarding concerns.) the option of requesting a landscape modification to address some of these conce) Response: See Sheets L-1, L-2 A1.02 . The landscape plans along the north property line have been revised as shown on drawings to take care of the shadin problems on the neighbors property. Also our site plan now shows a 5 feet high wood fence along the nor property line. Noise Two of the commenters were concerned about excessive noise from cars and outdoor activity on the site. Response: i have spoken to the church board and informed them of the neighbor's concern, and their response was that they will advise their church members to be considerate of door slamming, and any other situation that will cause a disturbance. Traffic Concern about traffic flow on 20'h and how vehicle queuing and turning movements will be addressed. Response: Please see response on items 2,3, and 4 in the Transportation management Section. Building Height Concern that church building might shade property to the NE of site. (Note: it appears the tallest building sections are located furthest from the neighboring properties and so shading from the church building on adjacent properties is unlikely.) Response: As the project architect, I can assure the neighbor that no roof shading will reach their property. Retention Pond Placement Concern that the pond is not placed in the best location on basis of aesthetics —concern it will be unattractive. Response: This concern is correct. The pond has been located as shown on the plan to accommodate design requirements, etc, but he church has discussed the appearance problem, and they will keep theirfront yard looking nice because they too are concerned. Front Entrance Concern that the front entrance does not face a street. Response.- If the entrance faced the street, then the parking would have also been in front of the building so for easy church access the parking is to the rear and side of the church. Therefore the parking is out of site. APPLICATION STATUS Pursuant to Federal Wrry Revised. Code development regulations. City departments and the Hearing Examiner are allotted 120 days to review and endeavor a decision on the Process 1 V zpplicati on. Any period in which the applicant has been requested to correct plans or provide additional information is excluded from the 120-day period. As of today, the review period has stopped with 56 days used. The review period will commence within 14 days of a wsubrnitta l Of items requested/corrected. 11 105117 Uic LU 60666 • 1 CLOSING When resubmitting requested information, please provide four copies of any reports and six copies of any plans, in addition to the green resubmittal form_ Pursuant to FWRC § 19.1 S_05b. if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. Response: We are in compliance and understand. If you have any questions regarding* this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 644, or janet.shull @cityoffederalway.com. Thank you for consideration of these responses. Sincerely, Don R. Kirkman 2606CFW2 INDEJC OF DRA WINGS FOR Russian SDA Church Job # 2606 PLAN # ❑ESCRIPTl�N (Rupert Engineering) RESUBMITTED JUL 18 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL 'WAY CDs DATE EV DAT REV. # C1 Base Ma C2 C3 C4 C5 C-6 TESC Plan Gradin & Draina a Plan Sections & Details Standard Details South 336th St. Intersection Site Distance 05/15/11 9/15/11 9/15/11 9/15/11 9/15/11 9/15/11 07/12/12 1 07/12/12 1 07/12/12 1 07/12/12 1 07/12/12 1 07/12/12 1 AKCHITECTURAL (Don R. Kirkman) A1.01 Site Plan A1.02 Site Plan/Parkin Plan 06/26/12 A2.00 Floor Plan/Enlar ed Plans 06/26/12 A3.01 Exterior Elevations none A3.02 Exterior Elevations 12/29/11 12/ 99/11 Revised 7/17/12 P.O. BOX 816 • AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98071.0816 • (253) 833-7910 • FAX (253) 833-7915 November 7, 201 3kirkmand*rtvenE u re.com City of Federal Way City Hall 33325 8th Ave. South Federal Way, 98003-6325 Attention: Ann Dower Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer RESUBMITTED NOV 13 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAy CDS RE: Russian Ukranian Parousla SDA Church Folder # 13-102881-00-CO; 1860 S 336th Street I V Building Permit review comments. Dear Ann, In response to your plan review of September 3, 2013 we are resubmitted the drawings, and the enclosures with this letter. General: 1. Current versions of the City's Standard Plan Notes, Drainage Notes, Erosion/Sedimentation Control Notes, and Street Lighting Notes are available on the City's website. Please revise all notes to conform to these. Response: Notes have been added. 2. Provide page of pages numbering. Response: Pages of pages has been addec_ 3. Update the engineer's stamp. Response: Stamp has been updated. 4. The City approval block must appear on all civil sheets except sewer and water. It is missing or incomplete on some sheets. Response: Approval blocks have been added. 5. Provide the permit number (13-102881-000-CO) in each approval block. Response: Permit # on each approval sheet has been added. 6. A "BMP" is required for this site. Please review section 5.2.1.3 of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. i l Response: ThL4 roof drains are already in an infiltration trench. The outside parking ❑r, 1 the north and west sides of the lot wilt be placed with permeable pavers C.2.6.4 to rneet the 20 o requirement of total lot area 0 1 7. The driveway on 20`s Ave S should be designed to provide safe and efficient traffic circulation. The proposed angle approach should be straightened and line up with the existing driveway cut. Alternatively, the applicant may relocate the curb cut north to line up with the parking lot approach. Response: See Sheet C3. Driveway exit has been redesigned. Sheet C1 8. Revise the City's inspection phone number to (253)-835-2700. Response: Phone number has been up dated. 9_ Include street lighting plan in the sheet index. Response: See Sheet A0.00 for the revised index showing the addition of ESA New Street Lighting Plan. Sheet C2 10. Provide a sediment trap or explain why one is not provided. Associated section views, restrictor device, ditches, check dams, etc. must also be shown. Response: Code write up added to TIR describing the code study on why the sediment f' trap is not required for this site. 11. Complete the notes associated with the catch basin insert detail. Response: Revised detail. Do not know what happen to those notes. Sheet C3 12. Provide typical parking stall and drive aisle dimensions. Response: See Sheet A1.02 We have added architectural site plan to provide this information. OK — adding arch site plan for reference to the civil set to provide this requested info. 13. Call out a detail number for the wall next to the wetland. .Response: OK 14. Provide the correct permit number in the as -built signature block. Response: OK 15. An access ramp is required for the bottom of the first wetland cell, or explain how all areas of the first cell can be accessed from the top of the wetland side slopes. 2 Response: A backhoe will reach from the top to do any maintenance. A detail on sheet C5 has been provide to diagram and present how maintenance would be redone to remove sediment, debris, or plant growth if ever needed. This pond for this small site i too narrow to fit a vehicle. A right-of-way permit and half street flaggers may be required during maintenance. 16. An emergency overflow is required for the wetland. Response: This has been provided. Outfall to only spot at sidewalk right-of-way. / Sheet C4 17. On the control structure detail, show the actual designed diameters of 0.74 and 1.36, not the nearest measurement. Response: This has been done. Sheet C5 18. Add city standard driveway detail 3-6A. Response: This has been done. Sheet C6 19. Please state on the plan both the required and the available sight distance per AASHTO. Also, state whether or not sight distance is adequate on the plan. It appears that there is adequate sight distance available Response: This has been done. Streetlighting 20. The streetlight plan should be on a separate sheet. Response: See Sheet ES.4 This is the new street lighting plan. 21. Please identify power sources and verify whether capacity exists to add new circuit. Coordinate with PSE. Response: See Sheet ES.4 Detail Note 1. This has been added. 22. 20th Ave S is classified as a minor collector. Per Street Light Standards Plan DWG No. 3- 38, the luminaire mounting height should be 30' with 150 lamp wattage. Include this in the Pole Schedule. Response: See Sheet ES-4 See added note #1. - 3 State J-box type (1, 2 or 8), whether it is an existing or new j-box, and verify that there is capacity for a new streetlight if it is existing. If it is new, show the j-box in the planter strip next to the pole, not in the sidewalk. Response: See Sheet ES-4, a new Site Plan that reflects the pole detail 3-39B. It shows the location of the light pole and has the street lighting notes. Refer to detail note #1 for the JBox necessary field co-ordination and contact information. New J-Box is provided in the planter strip next to the pole, not in the sidewalk. 23. Identify conduit size and runs. Conduit size shall be 2" min. PVC schedule 40 or 80. Use Schedule 80 for under driveways and street, per Standard Specs. Conduit run should not be under the sidewalk. Response: See Sheet ES-4. Detail added to sheet, Street Light Notes #2. 24. Pole number shall be per DWG 3-39B. Response: See Sheet ES-4 Note #3 added. 25. Luminaire arm length shall provide for a 2' overhang in front of the curb face. In this case, the arm length should be lined up with the curb face. Response: See Sheet ES-4. This has been indicated. Documents: Technical Information Report: 1. Please number the pages. Response: This has been done. 2. Provide an erosion control section in the TIR. Explain the sediment trap sizing or lack of one. Provide a SWPPP plan. Response: A code letter has been provided on why a sediment trap is not required. A State SWPPP will be provided 3. Please reprint the hand written sizing calculations (Steps 1-8). They did not print dark enough to read or reproduce. Response: This has been done. 4. Provide the full color sheet entitled "Parousia SDA Cut." It was copied incorrectly. 4 Response: This has been provided. 5. Provide a Distribution of Depths (p. 6-91, 2009 KCSWDM). Response: Distribution of depth dimension have been added to section A sheet C4 to show how percentages and depths are being meet per KCSWDM Table 6.4.3.A for divided berm submerged 1 foot in a option A wetland cell 6. The soils information does not appear to be specific to this site. Please provide soils logs to support the lack of a liner. Response: Wetland pond will be excavated into hardpan, see TIR and soils report soil` I ogs �1 - �,n. 1pt F Ya�vr� t �a.. LandscZn 4&A+2- w►a 7. The landscape pPan mus be inc uded with the civil plan set for mylars and final approval. Provide an approval block. Response: The approval block has been added. 8. The 2009 KCSWDM requires that certain plants be used in the stormwater wetland. They are listed on pages 6-98 of the manual. Response: See L-1 and L-2. The drawings have been revised. 9. Only lawn and trees are allowed within the planter strips on S 336th St and 20th Ave S. Please removed the Rubus and replace with lawn. Response: See L-1 and L-2. Rubus has been deleted and the lawn added. Bonding 10. Complete and return the enclosed bond information worksheet and bond quantities worksheet. Response: Please find the worksheets in the TIR report enclosed. Thanks for your careful review and interest you have shown to this project. Please feel free to contact the Civil Engineer Dave Dormire, or Don Kirkman with any further concerns. Sincerely, 5 V CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church Project Description: The applicant proposes to demolish an existing vacant single-family home and construct an 8,832 sq. ft. church. Associated site improvements include parking, landscaping, and stormwater improvements. Applicant: Don Kirkman, PO Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Project Location: 1860 South 336 h Street, Federal Way, WA 98003. Parcel #797820-0100 Date Application Received: December 30, 2011 Date Determined Complete: January 25, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: January 27, 2012 Comment Due Date: February 10, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File #11-105157-UP), Concurrency (File 11-105158-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File # 12-100185-SE) Environmental Documents & Studies: Environmental Checklist Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on February 10, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8°i Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Assistant Planner Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641 Doc_ l D 60183 U L U Q U) I�� O cu 0— c co .C/) N N CO M cM O U) 0 co 00 N _ c� 00-- -0C:C cm co Mu O V Q ,Qb � i� .� cnrn0oc�o C Q r V �. C)O (D.r Q N U a) .T \ z � U is O � ((�)) -0o- U U 0 [ .. I cu O c L is a) C)}� > D O C A— L � O)(U U Q0� : 1 r O SO. Q N L- I-L f 'U � f• �u�i a m s0) n a -- - - N N LL m r cu CU ca ca ca (L) a� w O L C o. Fed10'::t0p eral Way 41k DEPARTMENT OF COMiviuNlTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www-ciiyof f ederal wa v. c om DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION �� hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) F, Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed P e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on r, .) 6 , 2012. Project Name It File Number(s) S - 85 Signature Date K:\CD Administration Fles\Declaration of Dislribulion.doc/Last printed 1 /12/2012 2:20:00 PM �N _ M -a C moo (a 4-- O O CL W N N U rn C _� O U O '- C O O Q O O« co O +- cn Q a)U a c0 O C C -0 ca O L - O ow r- m U L > C L -0 ma% CD> � O L cn O m V Q r- • O Q� NC , E Mn C L a) L ch co Q N U U Q 0 U) co U) O V/ L M CL U O 00 L SOO cu .U) Eq N m = u, a)CU m 0L c O T f0 _0 c 3 0 0 c c 0 w ' Z � ��m a E 0. N T T O E N j U m c fa L U � .2 -0 Cc =ti. O En ~ zrno0 s AV Hioz 44k CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church Project Description: The applicant proposes to demolish an existing vacant single-family home and construct an 8,832 sq. ft. church. Associated site improvements include parking, landscaping, and stormwater improvements. Applicant: Don Kirkman, PO Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Project Location: 1860 South 336"' Street, Federal Way, WA 98003. Parcel #797820-0100 Date Application Received: December 30, 2011 Date Determined Complete: January 25, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: January 27, 2012 Comment Due Date: February 10, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File #11-105157-UP), Concurrency (File 11-105158-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #12-100185-SE) Environmental Documents & Studies: Environmental Checklist Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on February 10, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8 h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Assistant Planner Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641 Doc LD 60183 F.p,�" -2 0,.,406 S �o S' - �--WI WA at� d W 'fie an�� OD v� , via WA �8063 sr CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, -f Vk-M Ae-kdvkC.h hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other - ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or posted to or at each of the attached addresses on IIZ� IZ 2012. / Project Name R us so n U �-rC',.nc n?accwScc-, A CKQ c c- I File Number(s) k 2 - � 00 its--s E •J �l - ko �- - U P,z ( I - � C) (�- I S M r co Signature JDate � (Z' �Z K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution-doc/Last printed 1 /27/2012 4:02:00 PM FEB.23.2012 1:56PM KIRKMAN ARCHITECTS NO.559 P.2 Y CITY OF Fedel 01ay DEPARTMENT OE COMKUNII'Y I)MLOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8'� Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-8352607; Fax 253-835-2609 ,yww, city offe d eraiway. com SIGN INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE Project Name: Russian Ukxanian Parousia.,ci A church Project File No: 1 1 -1 021 01 -0 0-PC Project Address_ 1 860 S . 336th St. Installed By: oleg Reznichenko- Date of Installation: 2 - 2 2 -12 Location of. bistallation: Along the ouxb on S . 33§th ST & on 2 0 th Ave. S . •'iDu'tiwY:•:'�"lr?:iS.i:..1L. •'�A••••:4{141.iJY J-`I'Yi4. y+Tv hL6:�di: �4:..Of�r4Gi '.iM:'•_W �"Yi•'.'Wu-,,� .�4rY+i�[v.i'MA::.1b ��1��:.4l:r. ih�.�ti �`:.�4'••1'LY.�_iL W"IW�• i•. y Y:1 1{d Rq b,0 oa ba ■a nD la r•i 01 NY Ni ba Ed 16 ■•A YY ra r� Yli b9 iln R'1 N7 b/ wS [a b•A ra ua �i h :•11 T. in YI bi..i r 4 n r I, M T, � I m n v W r:1 e.1 '.1IIR']IIF" T: Yi Y. • 10V 111MP. "-MtK ff MF.']IA! `•IaT'•gY."MT:'IWT, I MT A1AT; 139t"WTI Lf)f1 Y. :Ip M1l .7 C1 F. ••AIV TAIi "aET Ij¢T Niil. I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the installation standards of the Department of Community Development Service's "Instructions for Obtaining & Posting public Notification Signs" and that the sign will be maiutailled until a final decision is issued on the land use action. I understand that failure to return this certificate within five days of posting may result in delay's, notice of corrections, and re -mailings at the applicant's expense. Installer's Name Installer's Si attire o2--11:;2cl? -/ Date Phone Rullctin #036 — August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 kAHandouts\Sign Installation Certificate PEB.23.2012 1:55PM KIRKMAN ARCHITECTS NO.559 P.1 Telefax Transmittal FAX: 253-833-7915 VOICE: 253-833-7910 Kirkman Associates, LLC Don Kirkman 3526 Academy Dr SE Auburn, WA 98092 P.O. Box 816 Auburn, WA 98071 DATE: February 23, 2012 PROJECT: Russian Ukranian Church 2606 TO: City of Federal Way ATTN: Customer Service FAX (253) 835 2609 NUMBER OF PAGES: 2 DESCRIPTION: Sign Installation Certificate COMMENTS; Any questions, feel free to call. SIGNED: Alice ❑PAGE [211J RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEB 0 3 2012 February 1, 2012 To: Community and Economic Development Dept. City of Federal Way 33325 8th. Ave. South Federal Way WA 98003 From: Barry and Charlene Turnbull 33355 20th. Ave. South Federal Way WA 98003 Dear Becky Chapin, We would like to address the letter we received from you on the Parcel of land to be developed on 336th and 20th Ave. South #797820-0100 We have a concern about the South end of our property that connects with the new planned church. We would Iike to have a fence that we can see through because our family room is in the back and we view out the window. There are some condos just down the street (East on 336th.) and we would like the same picket fence to be erected on the church side. We do not want a board fence because we have it on the West side and it has blown down and has been replaced. The plastic white picket fence on the condos lot is very attractive and will not blow down if placed properly. We have a chain link fence that could stay in place and could just add the new one to the other side. We have no problems with the development of the property but just the fence issue. Thank you for reading this letter. Sincerely, Barry and Charlene Turnbull %-I� as3 3%Av\ vgA Rebecca Chapin From: sag1218@aol.com Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 6:57 PM To: Rebecca Chapin Subject: Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church To whom it may concern - As a resident of the Forest Lane townhouses, I am registering my objection to the destruction of the home in question and building of another large church. Several times during the past summer they would have large yard sales there with cars all over the place. We already have one large church that has taken away some of the quietness that had been here at one time. Can they guarantee that it will be quiet, there won't be cars parked all over the place. Or that it will be a good neighbor. Since the mega church has not been. Tamara King 2100 S 336th St #R6 Federal Way WA 98003 253 517 3200 RE(;Llv tv ��, q, 2 O ► L FEB :t 0 201Z ov)ovh;c C�� K [. S -��ff COc ,fcCf � hssisfeMA- T\a.hne r 3�c y j rp S� rc Asa 1 e� 1�Lk55tcC� VIKvaril CkA l4.�'C�t,� �i O� ��i C ��c 1 �►^rJm�` �ib,`�, Ci)� ��/�,r ��'� �ulb1^ca - 333 �� -� �V�e a Ad 5cLcev1+ �6 T e-,rpose_d VC e c' C rts /cO m m e-Y� -�s A,h), (D �s ,� s r /') e re- 0), �� ec r5 J t)e ti�G ��7 4�r �-�e Pc -tA r n r'.� r,4D ro (Ase5 Ckl r?qd4 ewJ a-i - 36 fh or) � 2o� }��a�� CSC G i' � etc• -- QI-1�`��] i J6arS sSc<m s `�"?'e� �17C� �Cj �`2�'�n� hdrSPaP pei bm,-A �u d u � aee �rn r4 IL3 � � a ,�'p � il��' 1�L r��h�� s'n Jec,dw" ree+ � �` urr'fh�'j yr r& b If .5 �n c ors 1 7'e r0 i h, ah r l-1 n , bL + 1 rc� e✓ pp h 06 �1 �.S ��i V Y�-n rr�S n t� r� 1 1.f� �� S n f� er�� a �q( 0C�bl &,S � wsJ ► 0054 01Ar bac K �Y'� • � 11 d� Q�i Cr 5 T f m� �'-rT .� ►� - C3 h and 5'S � not rpn�' U 5:�. � e � a CL ►� j-Z o a r c�. � � max. l�� ,� � II ASS kj\ prh�Fon m ea. 5vre.S 51 }Z-L./ lj c� Pro �h�� u/,& cz� - 31919 15t Ave S, Suite 101 1 Federal, Way, WA 98003 1 253.925.556S 1253.925.5750 (f) Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi- weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way - Community Development Department as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive weeks(s), commencing on the 27th day of January 2012, and ending on the 27th day of January 2012, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $144.20, which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 9th day of February 2012. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND ND USE APPLICATION OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Russian Ukrainian.Parousia SDA Church applicant proposes to d� Project Description: The p ,p molish an existing vacant sin9la•famdy home and construct an 8,832 sq. ft, church. Associated site improvements include parking, landscaping, stormvrater improvements. Applicant: Don Kirkman, PO Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Project Liacalion: t8a0 South 336th Slreet, Feder- al Way. WA 98003, Parcel=797820-0100 Date Application Received: December 30, 2011 Date Determined Complete: January 25, 2012 Date o1 Notice of Application: January 27. 2012 Comment Due Elate: February 10.2012 Environmental Review: Based upon revlew of a completed environmental checklist, and other in- formation on file wilh the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Deter- mination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAG 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the pro- posed project. The proposal may include Mitiga- tion measures under applicable codes, and the re- view process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental th Impact statement (EIS) is prepared, A copy oe subsequent threshold determination for the speeil- Ic proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies. tribes. and the public d are encouraged and revieva and comment on the proposed project as probable environmental impacts. Comments must he submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File 111-105157-UP), Concurrency (File 11.105158- CN), and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination {File #12-100185•SE) Environmental Documents & Studies: Environ- mental Checklist Relevant Environmental Documents Are Avail- able at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for project Miti- gation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title id, "Environmental Policy;' Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19. "Zoning and Develop- ment Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments an the land use appNca- tion or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Devel- opment by 5:00 p.m. on February 10, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Di- rector (address below) or specifically request a copy at the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the envi- ronmental threshold determination. Details of ap- peal procedures for the requested land use deci- sien wild he included with the veritten decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable signifi- cant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Avaflabilltp of File: The official project file is available far public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003, Staff Contact: Assistant Planner Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641 FWM1849 Date Published: January 27, 2012 Federal Way Zoning Map 66 [t0 r,nn :. ` rg it ll•`•'�il� (CoLOWLe ) - Ir:lorra R"i mBC Ifixlyame In^ RM2400 ym arle sIa \ ' ]aIN I Imasm, 44 m_loulas i mR Poet r Ic n � N �' 1T11 nl.Y= I aN5 I I rato am]A 1RIMW ]mm r r.n Tt ]11al azol 17ti.— m]01 BC —III BC Fle'Ring9 WL,ym , `r F lar.m rL°nn cxesl< .,.°° t� Rl� M+'a'.rac g. ! z rc ]zenl xr •z 1r Amlmao STATE PLAT IN arm r n .. , z• a . v ss _ ]s T a111 SEC n r ,r,nm]m It 1 L,I n n m RM360041 HIN lllmlrl.M. lTaleaiflj i • o cos o ,w. ! .s�esso2i aaa Creek 111nneR a @ a I tow 7weemlm nno (. ,a Via L aezL s 330TH sr n11� ]tie] BC,eieeml® 4 mlz )07lmole0 ama TneRmoo "III 1.rmal O BCmlxa 7neemxm aim mem - mm mm=11v ally 7mmool5 BC aao TI rLYa'±1 S 338RD ST Seacoma Village rinloo. uv BC M3Ba . _ , , >s� mmxn Im5'IyOylo w ., � v y m5 mom .9 ama mu 61 s a = • "alo>6eea . 1e" ' „rn e v iF1iR111C ImSloOmy IG assTll PLI ew e RM2400 '^" maa Tzal lonmoua r 1111) RM2400 nrzl nm INGmIvo mQa menu m ne l.be iptl11 BC a16f A!W_j • �•• n sswr lette 6 )mm .. .racn r"� p '=Maio � ,oallo n m)eemsm ' dp.1 rbm.m• N flM3600 _11 ..,� as _._. 3330THST FI ...... .........._._y._,r_._r_r ➢ol6x•r sm nneomu "—�_,••`� ,_•••i4',.; a,:f3idE PSer S 330TH ST Ubl" ama Im E vw Ta1:�.R )enlmRo m0°I JI za1R 7e10e00ee2 RM2400 I nnmmsl 00111Vaal a010 enM _ C eeaaseenr '°'° 3++oGy,r:I La+tl re,eamul ,nemv5:o m'tIflM3600 zolu zou am as L 1 memoasz 365 vole �, rx ! m. E r :n 1 ava] z•r nnemw 1 _ i� l ,.,. nmmam rmt :etzamlro am:r° aallasa un amo a, RM1800 RM3600 a"' RM3600241--1 p G I amz HlM'm g5 mr I C •r ,�. luz lgttaeali aw 1 ms I 19ne0o100'y r. ; eln�slwNzm� zm mm rl]m0 u .aTGGIt. -- ,. nneman T ,r 331ST ST ~•` Ltarrr:i:'.�.r Fa Rarnn e0M V,_rw,r E ••, ••,Mww/ u�war.r-_.r .r 1111�m1 vr,. .`� 'Arles )B Van _......._...... aRe rr1 1¢umn lm 7 RM3600 a I an WI WtCIfAllXt y;T15T fS IIY3klq j�i•111L r sill Ar rL yc: a H1 n�-Cedar nmmiss re 16 n, 'mOml u ,., • 8& Ali p,r1 / Lin— :`11 sill w ,y lr:r.. as 'ra 317RD ST _.,...._.: / Pip Grove 7nemmlT _—• Park m„ 4111-1. nTL�'OCi" oz ra 3 1131YCIWd131 J130 el]ISm110 xai )BmZPlfil lo-xlan mu muolxv zme [af ar qz nI03o0yI6 ryAauvpA ' RM3600 lIw 61a1NG,L, ]ullr.. Van,]nl]m]x enlamxlo lnlswlm rulsmxm zmx mlvloor xax "' nnaea:l 3 RM1800 L Mil ry rq �• mtoeln: �•+ ]3111 i910xoo6r5 � r.� N aT RM3600 ''I' 7 M3600 rnn 'b' rssuoolo 1 mLn o�w nn_mmso ! elzeL % r., aau male cr Aa= 1iE ".='I N BC ; eln vwlp ` e arnx ' I xl¢,T ersso]mID � 1Pr]Laaa � naemoos � P!A3500 non � ua L rnm a.•Iawa S 336TH ST 7 zlnamzs �'a,,,a a snwaar Ba]ylaON veR wr E rnor S nxlouRl P�,.wln•L � as �,y y1 S 333RD ST S 333RD ST } 1 nrezmleo a 0 nv. mr ues a ! : mr nnxomlo STATE PLAT IN f FOREST I LANE SEC 1421-0 cONDO „ I m.17 uw RM3600 a a RM2400 IFS,« E nRzlrwe 1 „vra .. a5] Inemola •�'�'_.....�._._ r.. IVAIRIVO .. ,.. nm]>•LR zrGPL aa4 RM3600 a L". n,emy]I5 Q TemmerR lmmylm namolol asr ]aR ""' RM3600 , Rlamml, RM3600 neap • na 'nmmlm Q unmo1R A)l AU • _IRO I]rn L z a rn' RM3600 S 336TH STrL trl,ar�+z I ue-xt R If lt% 0t n Scale: City of Federal Way 1:1,8D0 33325 8th Ave S FA 1 inch equals 150 feet N PC Box 9718 0 75 150 moo 450 Feet Federal Way, WA 98D63 (253)835-7000 www.cilyollederatway.com G.neral L"a : Federal Way CKY 1. rIft Federal Way Pa) Ijal Annmaoen Area PS-1. 'GtiarlS SEPA Planned Action Area Boundary Subdivisions Environnan- Lagand: Q 1 Year Wea,ead Zo" Q 5 Yew Wellhead Zlme O 10 Year Wellhead Zone ]00 Yaar Faoadplalm t' Federal Way Sbeam Clal-4-bwr Pailrk Lakca '�. sire time 0 Snorclir]n 17eaisnRPona - F adaral Wry snorc6na DvaaO cIm - King Cowry Ykkarrds (1998 CAY Surrcyl Prmp•M Lat9rnd: U* or Fe defol vWY SWM Pr oparbef C•ry- County and Elate Park Proyvrtes City al Federal way Propvnvs Kmg County Prope 4" lztndmerkc MualFarniy Pfop.fbi Sehod Proportiea Tracft PrNale Open SAO- Failan11Wy 7wJa9 D-LOhaliona O Federal Wry Zoning Sourdazy e➢ c.mrou," BLAkwsa 6!: N,lI2hb0lhrad "inns 0E Camfrnrraw Finetprm M_td, 4r Core Cr C* C..onlef Fame SP p rR9e Pari•l OP p16ce Park .P•, Dom Park-1 bP; cace padc-2 0, _ 0%oe Pwk4 OP4 office Pwk-4 Fo Prolft a ,,Al once xr Am I e c D I wiv 1,800 Eq. Fees V.I74011 wJV2,40D Sq. Feel fa.+0&oo t IaliN3,600 Sq- Fe.l F n:y-g 1 wd115.DD0 Sq, Feel RS1] 1 wV7,200 Sq, Finar FRak 1 urR19,60094 Feet RS;Sy i-it)I5,00➢sal, Faal tune e I Lrtull5,o➢0 Sq, Paet 5£ I unws scram • Ce nrm:d by oevetopmeol Agreemat]t Kyp Cawt6, zoning oesfpr,ntiom� CS"Camly Zortinq Sowdary m1L�a:&las: . ApilalNral, 1 Unrt140 Apea r m.w..r,�, a.ld glrt� re toes_ Cawmundy &Rina" Lh Heiph6orhopd Buakresa 0 once R-1 Residential, 1 UndfAae R4 Rnadnn W, 4 LInIWAaF R 0 Residential, 6 UnblAcre R-a Rbrldentiaf, 6 UrlibrAcfe R-12 Rea'Idential, 12 UniWAGTe CI C Residential, 16 UriilalAae R-?q j•1aglda-twl, 24 UIIIWl ,ere R=)3 Residential, 48 UrWAcre •P Spedal Develupmeni Requirements WWWTIC 60LF PupPo56 OF TH15 MAP IS TO 2LM)RS DESlOzfT,TgNS.In tlm aveN °Ilr,y neanalmney b0—n tho, nap and tlm aNlrmnce .;rlq lrnr ern.rd:onk,v. n,e vrar,orrce.rw pmaa Tint nw • a ryr„gywn er anl.nr�a rlem nar,I. alalr.re Iaunts Myaraah aa:+rlcy LaWmn a d"A.M.runr IAigrviN. Net wuaeeal. .Wd . ] Ile,atdlelq rr. ppm±ormb..m, r, uekiaa kv rrearc. ah. Small rirp. a 1nh, I.,ea aLp.y KIYg caurer LOrray vfrrntraparvv.aq.xrrT rm.. tamn�rrq]r .rtawaavad lPwrM Pr+rdalmd,cv Panlrwv CONrey D ,r,r_�_ �; Flryrrn.ama nandrlaaa,na�rOs cay wv.y.era Tar.u:eayWF.e.mI WY•FEMA labpwnllalY DNait xa9 WareY �Ia6alLd Y,4alM id rad,�lp. lira .,m[l14Caarla dM� nm aka haaMl bNn YY�d- HYM city of F4deml Way tra.e Lwesa am wa..r-*aIra.=nenaa Regional Zordng Allah CITY of aldr+arvar.d+Fryaa r..dwrw. Qlfafter $eC!lofl Detail Series: a F E 0 E R A L en alma.rw rtaaa.`.a aebol WAY o Federal Way-�a'�°° Map 00I Lakehaven Tile K40 2 IiH5rr1VE aRE)L. aRAr 17tl.47. sw1641-04 'c AtiirrvNyarrnapk,ra.».pwrnr-y�r.ns neak. OW gUaRIF of Kroll M P M � - m. vF. AH r aAII..m.A•r w.n r a.rn..a- Map 66-SW lri 21-04-SW quarter of Kroll 727 z �11 tow 7weemlm nno (. ,a Via L aezL s 330TH sr n11� ]tie] BC,eieeml® 4 mlz )07lmole0 ama TneRmoo "III 1.rmal O BCmlxa 7neemxm aim mem - mm mm=11v ally 7mmool5 BC aao TI rLYa'±1 S 338RD ST Seacoma Village rinloo. uv BC M3Ba . _ , , >s� mmxn Im5'IyOylo w ., � v y m5 mom .9 ama mu 61 s a = • "alo>6eea . 1e" ' „rn e v iF1iR111C ImSloOmy IG assTll PLI ew e RM2400 '^" maa Tzal lonmoua r 1111) RM2400 nrzl nm INGmIvo mQa menu m ne l.be iptl11 BC a16f A!W_j • �•• n sswr lette 6 )mm .. .racn r"� p '=Maio � ,oallo n m)eemsm ' dp.1 rbm.m• N flM3600 _11 ..,� as _._. 3330THST FI ...... .........._._y._,r_._r_r ➢ol6x•r sm nneomu "—�_,••`� ,_•••i4',.; a,:f3idE PSer S 330TH ST Ubl" ama Im E vw Ta1:�.R )enlmRo m0°I JI za1R 7e10e00ee2 RM2400 I nnmmsl 00111Vaal a010 enM _ C eeaaseenr '°'° 3++oGy,r:I La+tl re,eamul ,nemv5:o m'tIflM3600 zolu zou am as L 1 memoasz 365 vole �, rx ! m. E r :n 1 ava] z•r nnemw 1 _ i� l ,.,. nmmam rmt :etzamlro am:r° aallasa un amo a, RM1800 RM3600 a"' RM3600241--1 p G I amz HlM'm g5 mr I C •r ,�. luz lgttaeali aw 1 ms I 19ne0o100'y r. ; eln�slwNzm� zm mm rl]m0 u .aTGGIt. -- ,. nneman T ,r 331ST ST ~•` Ltarrr:i:'.�.r Fa Rarnn e0M V,_rw,r E ••, ••,Mww/ u�war.r-_.r .r 1111�m1 vr,. .`� 'Arles )B Van _......._...... aRe rr1 1¢umn lm 7 RM3600 a I an WI WtCIfAllXt y;T15T fS IIY3klq j�i•111L r sill Ar rL yc: a H1 n�-Cedar nmmiss re 16 n, 'mOml u ,., • 8& Ali p,r1 / Lin— :`11 sill w ,y lr:r.. as 'ra 317RD ST _.,...._.: / Pip Grove 7nemmlT _—• Park m„ 4111-1. nTL�'OCi" oz ra 3 1131YCIWd131 J130 el]ISm110 xai )BmZPlfil lo-xlan mu muolxv zme [af ar qz nI03o0yI6 ryAauvpA ' RM3600 lIw 61a1NG,L, ]ullr.. Van,]nl]m]x enlamxlo lnlswlm rulsmxm zmx mlvloor xax "' nnaea:l 3 RM1800 L Mil ry rq �• mtoeln: �•+ ]3111 i910xoo6r5 � r.� N aT RM3600 ''I' 7 M3600 rnn 'b' rssuoolo 1 mLn o�w nn_mmso ! elzeL % r., aau male cr Aa= 1iE ".='I N BC ; eln vwlp ` e arnx ' I xl¢,T ersso]mID � 1Pr]Laaa � naemoos � P!A3500 non � ua L rnm a.•Iawa S 336TH ST 7 zlnamzs �'a,,,a a snwaar Ba]ylaON veR wr E rnor S nxlouRl P�,.wln•L � as �,y y1 S 333RD ST S 333RD ST } 1 nrezmleo a 0 nv. mr ues a ! : mr nnxomlo STATE PLAT IN f FOREST I LANE SEC 1421-0 cONDO „ I m.17 uw RM3600 a a RM2400 IFS,« E nRzlrwe 1 „vra .. a5] Inemola •�'�'_.....�._._ r.. IVAIRIVO .. ,.. nm]>•LR zrGPL aa4 RM3600 a L". n,emy]I5 Q TemmerR lmmylm namolol asr ]aR ""' RM3600 , Rlamml, RM3600 neap • na 'nmmlm Q unmo1R A)l AU • _IRO I]rn L z a rn' RM3600 S 336TH STrL trl,ar�+z I ue-xt R If lt% 0t n Scale: City of Federal Way 1:1,8D0 33325 8th Ave S FA 1 inch equals 150 feet N PC Box 9718 0 75 150 moo 450 Feet Federal Way, WA 98D63 (253)835-7000 www.cilyollederatway.com G.neral L"a : Federal Way CKY 1. rIft Federal Way Pa) Ijal Annmaoen Area PS-1. 'GtiarlS SEPA Planned Action Area Boundary Subdivisions Environnan- Lagand: Q 1 Year Wea,ead Zo" Q 5 Yew Wellhead Zlme O 10 Year Wellhead Zone ]00 Yaar Faoadplalm t' Federal Way Sbeam Clal-4-bwr Pailrk Lakca '�. sire time 0 Snorclir]n 17eaisnRPona - F adaral Wry snorc6na DvaaO cIm - King Cowry Ykkarrds (1998 CAY Surrcyl Prmp•M Lat9rnd: U* or Fe defol vWY SWM Pr oparbef C•ry- County and Elate Park Proyvrtes City al Federal way Propvnvs Kmg County Prope 4" lztndmerkc MualFarniy Pfop.fbi Sehod Proportiea Tracft PrNale Open SAO- Failan11Wy 7wJa9 D-LOhaliona O Federal Wry Zoning Sourdazy e➢ c.mrou," BLAkwsa 6!: N,lI2hb0lhrad "inns 0E Camfrnrraw Finetprm M_td, 4r Core Cr C* C..onlef Fame SP p rR9e Pari•l OP p16ce Park .P•, Dom Park-1 bP; cace padc-2 0, _ 0%oe Pwk4 OP4 office Pwk-4 Fo Prolft a ,,Al once xr Am I e c D I wiv 1,800 Eq. Fees V.I74011 wJV2,40D Sq. Feel fa.+0&oo t IaliN3,600 Sq- Fe.l F n:y-g 1 wd115.DD0 Sq, Feel RS1] 1 wV7,200 Sq, Finar FRak 1 urR19,60094 Feet RS;Sy i-it)I5,00➢sal, Faal tune e I Lrtull5,o➢0 Sq, Paet 5£ I unws scram • Ce nrm:d by oevetopmeol Agreemat]t Kyp Cawt6, zoning oesfpr,ntiom� CS"Camly Zortinq Sowdary m1L�a:&las: . ApilalNral, 1 Unrt140 Apea r m.w..r,�, a.ld glrt� re toes_ Cawmundy &Rina" Lh Heiph6orhopd Buakresa 0 once R-1 Residential, 1 UndfAae R4 Rnadnn W, 4 LInIWAaF R 0 Residential, 6 UnblAcre R-a Rbrldentiaf, 6 UrlibrAcfe R-12 Rea'Idential, 12 UniWAGTe CI C Residential, 16 UriilalAae R-?q j•1aglda-twl, 24 UIIIWl ,ere R=)3 Residential, 48 UrWAcre •P Spedal Develupmeni Requirements WWWTIC 60LF PupPo56 OF TH15 MAP IS TO 2LM)RS DESlOzfT,TgNS.In tlm aveN °Ilr,y neanalmney b0—n tho, nap and tlm aNlrmnce .;rlq lrnr ern.rd:onk,v. n,e vrar,orrce.rw pmaa Tint nw • a ryr„gywn er anl.nr�a rlem nar,I. alalr.re Iaunts Myaraah aa:+rlcy LaWmn a d"A.M.runr IAigrviN. Net wuaeeal. .Wd . ] Ile,atdlelq rr. ppm±ormb..m, r, uekiaa kv rrearc. ah. Small rirp. a 1nh, I.,ea aLp.y KIYg caurer LOrray vfrrntraparvv.aq.xrrT rm.. tamn�rrq]r .rtawaavad lPwrM Pr+rdalmd,cv Panlrwv CONrey D ,r,r_�_ �; Flryrrn.ama nandrlaaa,na�rOs cay wv.y.era Tar.u:eayWF.e.mI WY•FEMA labpwnllalY DNait xa9 WareY �Ia6alLd Y,4alM id rad,�lp. lira .,m[l14Caarla dM� nm aka haaMl bNn YY�d- HYM city of F4deml Way tra.e Lwesa am wa..r-*aIra.=nenaa Regional Zordng Allah CITY of aldr+arvar.d+Fryaa r..dwrw. Qlfafter $eC!lofl Detail Series: a F E 0 E R A L en alma.rw rtaaa.`.a aebol WAY o Federal Way-�a'�°° Map 00I Lakehaven Tile K40 2 IiH5rr1VE aRE)L. aRAr 17tl.47. sw1641-04 'c AtiirrvNyarrnapk,ra.».pwrnr-y�r.ns neak. OW gUaRIF of Kroll M P M � - m. vF. AH r aAII..m.A•r w.n r a.rn..a- Map 66-SW lri 21-04-SW quarter of Kroll 727 z �11 as �,y y1 S 333RD ST S 333RD ST } 1 nrezmleo a 0 nv. mr ues a ! : mr nnxomlo STATE PLAT IN f FOREST I LANE SEC 1421-0 cONDO „ I m.17 uw RM3600 a a RM2400 IFS,« E nRzlrwe 1 „vra .. a5] Inemola •�'�'_.....�._._ r.. IVAIRIVO .. ,.. nm]>•LR zrGPL aa4 RM3600 a L". n,emy]I5 Q TemmerR lmmylm namolol asr ]aR ""' RM3600 , Rlamml, RM3600 neap • na 'nmmlm Q unmo1R A)l AU • _IRO I]rn L z a rn' RM3600 S 336TH STrL trl,ar�+z I ue-xt R If lt% 0t n Scale: City of Federal Way 1:1,8D0 33325 8th Ave S FA 1 inch equals 150 feet N PC Box 9718 0 75 150 moo 450 Feet Federal Way, WA 98D63 (253)835-7000 www.cilyollederatway.com G.neral L"a : Federal Way CKY 1. rIft Federal Way Pa) Ijal Annmaoen Area PS-1. 'GtiarlS SEPA Planned Action Area Boundary Subdivisions Environnan- Lagand: Q 1 Year Wea,ead Zo" Q 5 Yew Wellhead Zlme O 10 Year Wellhead Zone ]00 Yaar Faoadplalm t' Federal Way Sbeam Clal-4-bwr Pailrk Lakca '�. sire time 0 Snorclir]n 17eaisnRPona - F adaral Wry snorc6na DvaaO cIm - King Cowry Ykkarrds (1998 CAY Surrcyl Prmp•M Lat9rnd: U* or Fe defol vWY SWM Pr oparbef C•ry- County and Elate Park Proyvrtes City al Federal way Propvnvs Kmg County Prope 4" lztndmerkc MualFarniy Pfop.fbi Sehod Proportiea Tracft PrNale Open SAO- Failan11Wy 7wJa9 D-LOhaliona O Federal Wry Zoning Sourdazy e➢ c.mrou," BLAkwsa 6!: N,lI2hb0lhrad "inns 0E Camfrnrraw Finetprm M_td, 4r Core Cr C* C..onlef Fame SP p rR9e Pari•l OP p16ce Park .P•, Dom Park-1 bP; cace padc-2 0, _ 0%oe Pwk4 OP4 office Pwk-4 Fo Prolft a ,,Al once xr Am I e c D I wiv 1,800 Eq. Fees V.I74011 wJV2,40D Sq. Feel fa.+0&oo t IaliN3,600 Sq- Fe.l F n:y-g 1 wd115.DD0 Sq, Feel RS1] 1 wV7,200 Sq, Finar FRak 1 urR19,60094 Feet RS;Sy i-it)I5,00➢sal, Faal tune e I Lrtull5,o➢0 Sq, Paet 5£ I unws scram • Ce nrm:d by oevetopmeol Agreemat]t Kyp Cawt6, zoning oesfpr,ntiom� CS"Camly Zortinq Sowdary m1L�a:&las: . ApilalNral, 1 Unrt140 Apea r m.w..r,�, a.ld glrt� re toes_ Cawmundy &Rina" Lh Heiph6orhopd Buakresa 0 once R-1 Residential, 1 UndfAae R4 Rnadnn W, 4 LInIWAaF R 0 Residential, 6 UnblAcre R-a Rbrldentiaf, 6 UrlibrAcfe R-12 Rea'Idential, 12 UniWAGTe CI C Residential, 16 UriilalAae R-?q j•1aglda-twl, 24 UIIIWl ,ere R=)3 Residential, 48 UrWAcre •P Spedal Develupmeni Requirements WWWTIC 60LF PupPo56 OF TH15 MAP IS TO 2LM)RS DESlOzfT,TgNS.In tlm aveN °Ilr,y neanalmney b0—n tho, nap and tlm aNlrmnce .;rlq lrnr ern.rd:onk,v. n,e vrar,orrce.rw pmaa Tint nw • a ryr„gywn er anl.nr�a rlem nar,I. alalr.re Iaunts Myaraah aa:+rlcy LaWmn a d"A.M.runr IAigrviN. Net wuaeeal. .Wd . ] Ile,atdlelq rr. ppm±ormb..m, r, uekiaa kv rrearc. ah. Small rirp. a 1nh, I.,ea aLp.y KIYg caurer LOrray vfrrntraparvv.aq.xrrT rm.. tamn�rrq]r .rtawaavad lPwrM Pr+rdalmd,cv Panlrwv CONrey D ,r,r_�_ �; Flryrrn.ama nandrlaaa,na�rOs cay wv.y.era Tar.u:eayWF.e.mI WY•FEMA labpwnllalY DNait xa9 WareY �Ia6alLd Y,4alM id rad,�lp. lira .,m[l14Caarla dM� nm aka haaMl bNn YY�d- HYM city of F4deml Way tra.e Lwesa am wa..r-*aIra.=nenaa Regional Zordng Allah CITY of aldr+arvar.d+Fryaa r..dwrw. Qlfafter $eC!lofl Detail Series: a F E 0 E R A L en alma.rw rtaaa.`.a aebol WAY o Federal Way-�a'�°° Map 00I Lakehaven Tile K40 2 IiH5rr1VE aRE)L. aRAr 17tl.47. sw1641-04 'c AtiirrvNyarrnapk,ra.».pwrnr-y�r.ns neak. OW gUaRIF of Kroll M P M � - m. vF. AH r aAII..m.A•r w.n r a.rn..a- Map 66-SW lri 21-04-SW quarter of Kroll 727 z �11 Scale: City of Federal Way 1:1,8D0 33325 8th Ave S FA 1 inch equals 150 feet N PC Box 9718 0 75 150 moo 450 Feet Federal Way, WA 98D63 (253)835-7000 www.cilyollederatway.com G.neral L"a : Federal Way CKY 1. rIft Federal Way Pa) Ijal Annmaoen Area PS-1. 'GtiarlS SEPA Planned Action Area Boundary Subdivisions Environnan- Lagand: Q 1 Year Wea,ead Zo" Q 5 Yew Wellhead Zlme O 10 Year Wellhead Zone ]00 Yaar Faoadplalm t' Federal Way Sbeam Clal-4-bwr Pailrk Lakca '�. sire time 0 Snorclir]n 17eaisnRPona - F adaral Wry snorc6na DvaaO cIm - King Cowry Ykkarrds (1998 CAY Surrcyl Prmp•M Lat9rnd: U* or Fe defol vWY SWM Pr oparbef C•ry- County and Elate Park Proyvrtes City al Federal way Propvnvs Kmg County Prope 4" lztndmerkc MualFarniy Pfop.fbi Sehod Proportiea Tracft PrNale Open SAO- Failan11Wy 7wJa9 D-LOhaliona O Federal Wry Zoning Sourdazy e➢ c.mrou," BLAkwsa 6!: N,lI2hb0lhrad "inns 0E Camfrnrraw Finetprm M_td, 4r Core Cr C* C..onlef Fame SP p rR9e Pari•l OP p16ce Park .P•, Dom Park-1 bP; cace padc-2 0, _ 0%oe Pwk4 OP4 office Pwk-4 Fo Prolft a ,,Al once xr Am I e c D I wiv 1,800 Eq. Fees V.I74011 wJV2,40D Sq. Feel fa.+0&oo t IaliN3,600 Sq- Fe.l F n:y-g 1 wd115.DD0 Sq, Feel RS1] 1 wV7,200 Sq, Finar FRak 1 urR19,60094 Feet RS;Sy i-it)I5,00➢sal, Faal tune e I Lrtull5,o➢0 Sq, Paet 5£ I unws scram • Ce nrm:d by oevetopmeol Agreemat]t Kyp Cawt6, zoning oesfpr,ntiom� CS"Camly Zortinq Sowdary m1L�a:&las: . ApilalNral, 1 Unrt140 Apea r m.w..r,�, a.ld glrt� re toes_ Cawmundy &Rina" Lh Heiph6orhopd Buakresa 0 once R-1 Residential, 1 UndfAae R4 Rnadnn W, 4 LInIWAaF R 0 Residential, 6 UnblAcre R-a Rbrldentiaf, 6 UrlibrAcfe R-12 Rea'Idential, 12 UniWAGTe CI C Residential, 16 UriilalAae R-?q j•1aglda-twl, 24 UIIIWl ,ere R=)3 Residential, 48 UrWAcre •P Spedal Develupmeni Requirements WWWTIC 60LF PupPo56 OF TH15 MAP IS TO 2LM)RS DESlOzfT,TgNS.In tlm aveN °Ilr,y neanalmney b0—n tho, nap and tlm aNlrmnce .;rlq lrnr ern.rd:onk,v. n,e vrar,orrce.rw pmaa Tint nw • a ryr„gywn er anl.nr�a rlem nar,I. alalr.re Iaunts Myaraah aa:+rlcy LaWmn a d"A.M.runr IAigrviN. Net wuaeeal. .Wd . ] Ile,atdlelq rr. ppm±ormb..m, r, uekiaa kv rrearc. ah. Small rirp. a 1nh, I.,ea aLp.y KIYg caurer LOrray vfrrntraparvv.aq.xrrT rm.. tamn�rrq]r .rtawaavad lPwrM Pr+rdalmd,cv Panlrwv CONrey D ,r,r_�_ �; Flryrrn.ama nandrlaaa,na�rOs cay wv.y.era Tar.u:eayWF.e.mI WY•FEMA labpwnllalY DNait xa9 WareY �Ia6alLd Y,4alM id rad,�lp. lira .,m[l14Caarla dM� nm aka haaMl bNn YY�d- HYM city of F4deml Way tra.e Lwesa am wa..r-*aIra.=nenaa Regional Zordng Allah CITY of aldr+arvar.d+Fryaa r..dwrw. Qlfafter $eC!lofl Detail Series: a F E 0 E R A L en alma.rw rtaaa.`.a aebol WAY o Federal Way-�a'�°° Map 00I Lakehaven Tile K40 2 IiH5rr1VE aRE)L. aRAr 17tl.47. sw1641-04 'c AtiirrvNyarrnapk,ra.».pwrnr-y�r.ns neak. OW gUaRIF of Kroll M P M � - m. vF. AH r aAII..m.A•r w.n r a.rn..a- Map 66-SW lri 21-04-SW quarter of Kroll 727 z �11 z �11 Tamara Fix From: Rudi Alcott [ralcott@fedwaymirror.coml Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:03 PM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Russian SDA Church NOA & Opt DNS No problem. We will get this done for you. Thanks. Take care, Rudi Alcott Publisher Federal Way Mirror p: 253.925.5565 x-1050 c: 253.336.5359 t: 206.390.5925 On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Tamara Fix <Tamara.Fix ci offederalwa .comma wrote: Please publish the following legal notice (Russian SDA Church NOA & Opt DNS, 11-105185) in Friday's (Jan. 27, 2012) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. Thanks! Tamara Fix Admin Asst. City of FederaC-Way tamara. "xca)cit o ederafwa .com. 'When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile." Unknown 41k CITY 401':t�� OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a. ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) 1�q Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was marled ❑Faxed e mar! d andlor ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2012. Project Name ,l ASS FileNumber(s) 1) JUz�2, 11-lWE)�b'� 1�-1�b1�? Signature , Date G l K:\CD Administration FiileADeclaralion of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /12/2012 2:2090 PM CITY OF A Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church Project Description: The applicant proposes to demolish an existing vacant single-family home and construct an 8,832 sq_ ft. church. Associated site improvements include parking, landscaping, and stormwater improvements. Applicant: Don Kirkman, PO Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Project Location: 1860 South 336th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003. Parcel #797820-0100 Date Application Received: December 30, 2011 Date Determined Complete: January 25, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: January 27, 2012 Comment Due Date: February 10, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared_ A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File #11-105157-UP), Concurrency (File l 1-105158-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File # 12-100185-SE) Environmental Documents & Studies: Environmental Checklist Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on February 10, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision_ Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8'b Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003_ Staff Contact: Assistant Planner Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641 Doc. [ D 60183 a) Q 00 w LLu l 1,, U) 0 LL M 0— M .C: cu L U) L cM c7 t O U) Q a0 >1N _ cM 0. � � C m a) ca .I, C _= (U O Q a. _C a) co .— U C:c co O) U O O Q o.=3c0 Q a) U ti SE U U U p O C L L - " "O Q > O O ate+ cu _C L � tQ U Q- c 3 N OE C — E Q Y L daa)itusivaU) (6 = rn a) (G U m U- m `c$ _ =ate 4 Z Q C I � a E Q 00 > T CD a, 3 s.� O o m LL ~ Zrno� 01/10/2012 City of 300' Parcel C325BthAveS ay 33325 Bth Ave S Federal Way Notification area Federal WayW0 98003 (206) - 835 - 7000 www.cityoffederalway com Alf $O.Of 3 120. 0110 0100 - 7W824D"', 797820-0020 I 797820-0080 797820-0081 797920-0086 797820-0085 413150.{13160. 413150-413150, 4t3150- "183 797620-0162 -. - _ - - - 0160 0170 0180 0190 02M 4131 0210 �0• 0166 S 333RD ST - -- S 333RD ST _ S 333RD ST 797820-0025 1 797820- 0184 797820-0076 797820-0090 797820-0182 259620-0000 - 797620-0075 4129da- 4128s0• •••---,.w -. _- _ - - _- - _ 79782D-WAS 00"4: 0030 797020- 7i7820-01G� 4129m0. 41294D• ` 0102 t OM OM-- 797820-0108 . � 412W6 41MO. 7a7820.0070 70070-0000 F9782Og101; 0103 I 0015 4f21M4 Q a72440- -- rn 0010 0045 j 797B20.i 797020-0100 Q 7978204106 797a20{O90 4t;*0- 00 0096 I 4125K4 0080 uaro.. F _- - — N -- - 212104- 9025 - - - - - - - - - - 2 ix40{49037 , Q x I N I 212104-9027 212104-9069 l _ � I I 212104�9026 212104-9004 212104-9068 212104-9003 I 212104-9024 212104- 212104- 212104 W 9041 9042 9040 212104-9039 2121049047 IFS r-- —.. — 390380.I 390380-0110 CO) 390380-0100 f 0160 J x - - 390380-00701 390380.00W 212104-9082 F 212104-9061 212104-9085 -_ - - - - 390380.0080 390380.009D 390380.0140 3a130 1 390380-01201 - - S 341ST ST - - - " 212104-9033 390380.0040 390380-0050 2121049060 12121049048 390380-0030 7�t}ga10 797820-0215 797820-0220 289760-0000- 797820-0225 j Legend A CITY OF — King County Tax Parcels \ Scale: Federal Way Subject Pro ert /N o 150 eet P y This map is mfanlSQd for use as a graphical representahan only If Notified Properties V The City0f F470f4t Way makes r—mantyas to its accuracy. 0 0 O 0 N OD CJ 1n C 0 Z JAN I 1 ZOIZ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Q ui 0 ui � �� W u 0 m m IL w lii C.`. M M M d crl Crl M M M ffl M M M M M c'1 M M M M M M f!1 M M M O O O O O ^ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O ^ O kn V) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 m 00 00 DD 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 � 00 00 0000 00 O, O1 41 OM O1 Cyl 01 G1 O� � 41 a1 O� (1 all O1 all (ON41 d\ 00 ON d\ D1 O\ U Q a O1 a 01 � Q Q ^ Q a Q a Q kr)V1 Q a a coo,, a a Q a Q a a Q Q ¢ Q 00 Q * 3 3 Q 3¢ a 3 3 Q 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3w 00 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N 3� 3 3 3 3 3 w 3 3 E 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 x 3 3 3 3 3 3 a 3 ow w w w w w w w w w w w w w O w w w w w w w w w w w w w a w p p p p p p .? p p Ca L1 p z p L p U Ll L1 p p p p C1 a 0 W 0 0 0 w w Q w w w w w w w w W w w w¢ w w w w w w w Q w rJ. w w u. 3 Lt rS a_ u, a_ CG LT- w a. E- a_ w u_ ul a_ p a. u; a_ w Li. " a. ut M � M C/) p1 U U p W r Q ¢QQz >m zvz zQ 3owzwIww LL¢ �zv�, t N w a ¢ a �„ p xt it 4t 3 c7 3 w�--UE--�F- Z � �t > cn a .a cn cn 4t V) 0 V)cn cn Z V) 0 C*O 0 0 0 C/) 000 2 z Z Fa ¢ (Q M M M Mc') M M O M W M M M N 2 !0_ °O cn Q ¢ cn W cn rn Ln 0 cn O O 0 Cn cn 0 cn cn cn � cn f cn cn M p o 0 00 o z z o o p o 0 0 0 o m o o m o 0 0 Cl 0 0 o M o 0 0 0 0 0 0^ cl O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 N Q N N N N CV oo N N N N N 0. (V N M (V N N N N N (V N N N M w z J z Q U W LLJ a w ¢ w LL) w w a Q U U w p w ¢ > + w w+ W? O w L w 0¢ w+ Z Qw U¢zz¢ Iw[-3v Z w Q W¢ Z zO Q¢ M> Q Q p¢¢ x Q a Z Z W U w 3 x z z z >, a x x C4 w> = Q¢¢ a w -' ti W 2 z z ti 0+ } p W¢ Ow aG x 3 Z cn Z a p z r� p Q w. a w U a Z C7 w x 4. O w `� Q W 00 Fr c4 �_¢ 4 Z W 0 p= Q a; z 2 3 W w W Ca W Z w cn Q 0W 3 O cn i-1 -a w z 3 C7 a, U > N U z F- D0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ r N M V LO (D I-- 00 6) O r N M NT LD (D I— 00 O O r CV M 'T LD (c) I` 00 O O r N M LD O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r= r r N N N N N N N N N N cM Cf) (M M M M i- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N N" N N N" N N N" N N X Cc) (D (D Cc) M (D (c) (D Cc) (D (D (D O (D M (O M O CO (.0 (D (.0 (D (c) (DM (.0 (.0 (D (D (D (D CD (fl (D 0) O CY) (A 0') 0')C)) 0) 0) CA CA O 6) CA D) 0) O 6) 0) O O coO O 6) (7) 6) O) CA O 0) 0)6) LD LC) LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD Lo U) LD L() LD LD LD � u L() Lf) LD Lo LD LD O 0) LD LD LD LD LD Lo LD Lo N (V N N N N N N N (V (V N CV N N N N N N (V N N" N N N N N N N N N N N N r N M� LD (D 1— 00 O O r N M� LD (D I— 00 O O r N M� LD M r— 00 (y) O r N M� LD r r r r r r r r r r N 04 04 N N N 04 N 04 N M M M CO M CO m rn M a_ N x F- N z w Z 0 V) V) V) V) V) v) V) 0 (1, (A �o z w M M M M M M M M M a V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) 0., Q O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O 00 Q N N cV N" N N N N kn M M M M M M f'1 M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 DD 00 00 00 C� 01 O` a1 ON d\ 0� 0� O, Cl (T ¢ a a¢¢¢¢ a a a a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w�w�wrxww�www� Q Q Q Q Q Q o 0 o Q o i x x x x x x> x x x x x x V) V) V) V) V) V) kfl (A Cl) 0 V) V) Cl) O O O Cl O O O O O O Cl O O O O O _O O N O O O O O O N N N N N N M N N N N N N o F- N LLI U it it- zw- F- x°xxx�-xxxxx z M O M M M w M M M M M M c V) V) cn zo cn 0 V) cn V) O O O O O \O O O O O O O cal O O O O1 O O O O O N r N"T N N N N N N" N w Qa� �z:3a W¢ N H(n tiaz ¢ a? ti��aC o. w Q x3 z�¢o¢ w ¢ � O O � z U W C7 ¢ O o aO W QO �� x�Q�a>za1�wzw¢¢3 > `/ WU o zU� U Uw z�w� = Q nw zam��w�xwQz¢ v a 0 z � �,, � o � > z ¢a ¢iv p z U v 2 ¢ n ? � mzo ULcnw z ti w zUo 3m °xz �D14 W U 2 3 gW -0¢¢ -j w <a� a w x z y� a o (D M O O N m LOLOLOLOLoLoLOLo N 0 I— M O O N (D N 0 00 (M O O N 0 N 0 O CM O O N m N 0 O q1t O O N (D N 0 IqT O O N (0 N 0 (V V O O N (0 N 0 M It O O N m N CD Iq O O N (D CY)� N 0 Lo O O N (D o' N 0 (D � O O N (O o'�LOLo°oLo° N 0 I- O O N (D N 0 co O O N 0 N 0(D 6) O O N (D N O LO O O (V (D N 0 — V) O O N (D N 0 N (n O O N (D Lf)toL� N 0 M LO O O N CO N 0 't to O O N (D N 0 (() LO O O N (O N 0 (O LO O O N (0 r'�Lo N 0 f� V) O O N (O N 0 00 LO O O N (O N 0 O LO O O N (D L()LO� N 0 CD (D O O N (4 N 0 (D O O N CO N 0 N (O O O N (D OLOL N 0 M (D O O N CO N CD qqT (D O O N (D N 0 LD (O O O N (D LO N 0 (DC` CD O O N (D O'er N 0 (0 O O N CO CY) N 0 00 (O O O N (D �'(O N 0 6) (O O O N (D N v 0 N N 0) m a_ M co OMO M V IT NT V V � V qT � (O LO IN Lo lLo U7 io LO Lo LO (O (O M (O (D (O (D (D (O (O w Iyl w z_ J U) U) w p p Q M M M Cl) M M Cl) O N O O O O CD O O O CD O CD O O CD CD CD�O CD O O CDO CD N CD O O CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 00 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a. rn rn rn o rn ON00� rn rn rn o` ON a, o, ON rn aI o, o, of rn ON GN rn al a, o a¢ a¢ o a Q Q^¢ a a Q a Q a Q a a¢ Q a¢ Q¢ Q a a¢ a¢ a o 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3^ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 300 Q a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q a ¢ ¢ ¢ Q a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ ¢ ¢ a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ON a Q a ¢ ¢ ¢ a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ¢ ¢ ¢ a ¢ a ¢ ¢ w a ¢ a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a ¢ ¢ z ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q a ¢ Q ¢ a ¢ z a: C� w www ¢ w w w w w w www w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w W Li. w W.. w _ U. w u.. u.. m w R. a.. u. w �.. w �. rS. �.. w LL. cC � M � H^ F h No N o N o W a o4 �4t ait a� �'> �' 4t F- E E- F� E� F- 4taa�it F [- E� F- E� w F- E- 4t4 h E- a 4tua E- E F- F- F- a w Z F- � E� V) F- cn E� cn E- � [- cn F� UD w � cn cn cn � cn � V) cn > cn � 4t p cn En C/) a M M M M M M x M M M M M M 3 M Cl M M a w M cn M Ln M cn M cn x O M uo M cn M cn M M M uo cn M � M cn M U) cn U) cn U) cn �_ N O cn cn on cn 0 DO cn V� cn O p o 0 0 o CO o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O_ 0 O 0 O_ 0 0. O O_ o O 0 O 0 O_ 0 0 Nl o 0 0 0 �o O O_ O_ O_ O O O _O O O_ O O_ O O CC 00 00= 00 00 M Q N N N N a. N (V N w N N N N N N N N N N N t>~ N N N N^^ (`I w Z J Z Q W T a LQ ¢ a H C7 + V) a N x x wz� a U z Q x w Z �= ¢ w 3 w c+i) w a W¢ w ¢x �x o¢ z2ww [�-.way z+��- z a } w �" w �'" ¢? z 0¢ O >¢ a ¢ x o z z¢ w 7- Z Q C7 z c� w Q rWL m�� J w F.. a �¢ z ix w Oa ° w x p cn w pa z z -� z w >- x wF w �, w �4 � � z U x x w w wwC',`'zw�w w w�::)awvC/)m3o3wovaz a z W o En Qcnox z z EE � z� m °n �¢ w °¢ u> u zC/) ¢¢ gy U° m° 2 3 O O O o 0 0(D 0 0 o O o 0(D M 0 V CD LO 0 (D 0 I` 0 00 0 O 0 O— 0 0 N 0 M 0 q 0 LO 0 = 0 N 0 M 0 I 0 Lf) 0 (D 0 Il- 0 00 _ O Il- I— N ti CO I— V Il- LO I` (D I` I— I` 00 I` O (D I` 00 T 00 N 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 O 0) (A 0) O O O O O O O O O O O H O O O O (D O O O O O CD CD O O (D O O O O O O O O CD O O O O O O O CD O CD O CD O CD O O O CD O (D O (D O O O O O CD CD O CD N O N O N O N O N O N O O N N O N O N O N O N O N O N N N N N N N N N N I- I— ti ti I-- I— I` I` J Y N CD N (D N CD (D CD (D (D CD (D LD CD (D (D CD (D (D (.D (D (D (D O (D O (D 6) (D O (D C) (D O (D O O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 a O O O 6') O O O O O O O) O) O O O 6) O O) r-r- tt-W � � N N N N N N N N N N NNN N N N N N N N N NN N " N I` O 04 CO 'T LO (D I— 00 6) O N ( M - V) (D I� 00 0 00 0 6) = 0) (V O M 6) 'IT 6) LO CF) (D O I— 6) 00 O O O O O r O N O Cl) O I� I� ti ti ti ti ti N 00 00 00 00 00 co 00 co O N m (0 a w w • • M f�l M ff1 M M M M f'1 M M f�l M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C. O O O O O O O O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 O\ U G1 ON D\ a1 O\ U Q\ O\ (01, N Q� ^ C'V M C7, 011 ON O1 k oo 3333 330p0 00 3 Q ¢ ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ z ¢ ¢ ¢ 3 3 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ w ¢ ¢ Q J, ¢ ¢ z ¢ 3 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ xx ' 02x0� xocxx xxxxox�o.�x ww wwwwwwwwc,.Ow w w w O C] z C] z C] C� 0 C] Ca C] Q C] 2 v U C] W �" Ca C] u� w w w w w w w W w w w w W ¢ w a w w w W w w C� LT. rS, LL. k. W. LT. L rS, Lc [L CQ c1 ¢ G 0. L. LlT LL �• N Cl _ N 0 N O N ,_. NO 2 N p N O O N Q ]C Cq N^ z 2 cn 4t 4t 0 z 4 0 0 > 0 cnC-1) V) V) W ccn > cn ci F- Ex- Cl) O \O 0 O 00 0 Cn CA Cn ] CA O Cn O -,t Cn O O Cn O Cn O V] O Cn O Cn O on O 0 O Con O O M O N m ,-. O O O O M M N M M M M M M M M M M M O ^ N O 01 M 00 M 00 00 00 M 00 ] 00 00 00 � 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 t- [� C .-. � .-. r. r- �--i �-. .-. co 00 ^ u J 7 L x U C7 O w x w¢¢ Q Q Q W Z c7 fn z O Ca ¢ Q a¢o o O z 3 3 o z¢ z¢ w w N Z W w Q w z ZD w F- Q w [`ni] w 0 L C] N Z z U 0 U O W p 0 p m w¢ �� Q O Q- Q W z¢> 3 3 pa a 3 ¢ 2 U C] C7 — ce ¢ ¢ C7 a C7 fn O O O O CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N M� LO CO f- M O O— N M� LO CO I- 00 0') O— N - O- .-- ---- N CV N (V N N N N N N M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cDc 0c J C) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 M 00 M M M M 00 00 00 OD 00 00 co 00 00 00 00 00 co 00 M 00 00 Oo 00 O Oo M CO 00 CO CO CO OO W 00 M M M CO CC) CO O CO CO CO CO — I— Il- t` r- rl- � I-- Il- ti ti I` I` I` r- ti r- r- r%- r- r- I- ti I- 10 O a d w d Jr� IJI C N O I;r LO 0 Il- M O O N M O O N M V O ti I O O O O O O r N N N N N N N N DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov Mail NOA/Optional DNS and SEPA Checklist to the following agencies: PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 Mail NOA/Optional DNS Only to the following agencies: BRIAN ASBURY LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 basbury@lakehaven.org MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 ATTN VIR0NMENTAL R ER PUYALLU TRIBE OF DIANS 3009 E PORT AVE TACOMA WA 4 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE f 31617 1 ST AVE S / FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 info@southkingfire.org Tamara Fix From: Tamara Fix Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:08 PM To: 'ECY RE SEPA UNIT' Subject: NOAIOptional DNS Russian SDA Church Attachments: NOA_Optional DNS Russian SDA Church.pdf Attached is the NOA & Optional DNS and Annotated Environmental Checklist for the Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church in the City of Federal Way. This was issued on January 27, 2012, and the Assistant Planner for the project is Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641, rehecca.cha pin CeDcRyoffederaiway.com. urv, Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church Project Description: The applicant proposes to demolish an existing vacant single-family home and construct an 8,832 sq. ft. church. Associated site improvements include parking, landscaping, and stormwater improvements. Applicant: Don Kirkman, PO Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Project Location: 1860 South 336 h Street, Federal Way, WA 98003. Parcel #797820-0100 Date Application Received: December 30, 2011 Date Determined Complete: January 25, 2012 Date of Notice of Application: January 27, 2012 Comment Due Date: February 10, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File #11-105157-UP), Concurrency (File 11-105158-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #12-100185-SE) Environmental Documents & Studies: Environmental Checklist Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on February 10, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 80' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Assistant Planner Becky Chapin, 253-835-2641 Doc- I.D- 60183 INDEX OF DRAWINGS FOR Russian SDA Church Job # 2606 PLAN # DESCRIPTION DATE tEV DATq REV. # CIVIL (Rupert Engineering) C1 Site Plan 05/19/11 C2 TESC Plan 9/15/11 C3 Grading & Details 9/15/11 C4 Sections & Details 9/15/11 C5 SO. 336th St. Intersection Site Distance 9/15/11 S-Cl Sewer Plan 9/15/11 W-C1 Water Plan 9/15/11 9/15/11 ARCHITECTURAL (Don R. Kirkman) A1.01 site Plan 10/19/11 A2.00 Floor Plan/Eniar ed Plans 04/20/11 A2.11 Roof Plan 08/13/10 A3.01 Exterior Elevations 10/19/11 A3.02 Exterior Elevations 10/19/11 A4.01 Building Sections 04/20/11 ELECTRICAL () EP-1 Photometric Site Plan 12/9/11 LANDSCAPE- L-1 Landscape Site Plan & Plant List 12/6/11 w TV L-2 Enlarged Landscape corner and Street Palntin 12/6/11 1 C Mm 12/30/2011 KIR][lamMAN ASSOCIATES, 1LdLC P.O. BOX 816 • AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98071-0816 • (253) 833-7910 • FAX (253) 833-7915 kirkmand@nventure.com November 8, 2012 City of Federal Way Dept. of Community & Development Services 33325 8th Ave. So. Federal Way, WA 98063 Subject: Russian Ukrainian Parousia SDA Church 1860 So. 336th St. Federal Way Dear Janet Shull: RSSUBA72 Nov 0 9 2012 C1ryr OF FIEDFRRL COS WA 1, On August 21st, 2012 the following comments were sent to our office from Sarady. The items are addressed and responded to here and with the enclosed drawings. The Public Works Traffic Division has reviewed the submitted material and provides the following technical comments. Street Lights The design does not need to be approved as part of UP approval, however the applicant should perform due diligence to make sure that the conceptual plan is feasible. Below are technical design comments. 1. Identify J-box type (1, 2 or 8) and if it is an existing or new j-box. If existing, verify whether capacity exist to add new circuit and conduit. Response: When the site plan for the church project has been approved the electrical engineer will be contracted to design and to verify and to provide for the City answers to City's questions on Street lighting and the power requirements. 2. Provide streetlight pole number with station and offset. Please see example below: L Response: When the site plan for the church project has been approved the electrical engineer will be contracted to design and to verify and to provide for the City answers to City's questions on Street lighting and the power requirements. 3. Identify conduit size and runs. Conduit size shall be 2" min. PVC schedule 40 or 80. Use Schedule 80 for under driveways and street, per Standard Specs. Please see example of wiring schedule below. Response: When the site plan for the church project has been approved the electrical engineer will be contracted to design and to verify and to provide for the City answers to City's questions on Street lighting and the power requirements. 4. Need to identify power source for connection and coordinate with PSE for connection. Response: When the site plan for the church project has been approved the electrical engineer will be contracted to design and to verify and to provide for the City answers to City's questions on Street lighting and the power requirements. Site Plan Review Comments 1. The driveway on 20th Ave S should be designed to provide safe and efficient traffic circulation. The proposed angle approach should be straightened and line up with the existing driveway cut. Alternatively, the applicant may relocate the curb cut north to line up with the parking lot approach. Response: It is very expensive cost wise to replace the existing drive entrance. This has been discussed tithe the traffic engineer and he suggested a center line stripe on the entry drive should work to guide traffic in and out. Transportation Management Plan 1. Due to the proximity to residential neighborhood, staff is recommends using ITE 85th percentile to derive parking demand in lieu of the average rate. This would ensure minimal impact to residential on -street parking. Response: See enclosed traffic report. 2. The proposed overflow off site parking at the Lifeway Center Administrative Office will not likely be used due to the distance between the two locations. Parishioners would more likely utilize the available on -street parking along 20th Ave S. Staff recommends coordinating with adjacent property to the north (CFC) for any parking overflow. Response: See enclosed traffic report. 3. The queuing analysis based on Ohio DOT is not acceptable. The analysis should be for the site peak period (either Saturday or Sunday) and should include existing traffic on the road. Please verify that the NB & EB queues from 20th Ave S & S 336th St. will not block the new driveways. Furthermore, the analysis should also include all vehicles entering and leaving the driveways. Please use either the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method or Synchro software to calculate/estimate the expected queue. A sample printout from synchro is attached. Response: See enclosed traffic report. The items on your letters have I trust be addressed acceptably and your review of this will be satisfactory. Sincerely, i�� I "Iewu Don R. Kirkman 2606 FWPR CITY OF 4s� Federal Way DATE: August 215t, 2012 TO: Janet Shull MEMORANDUM Public Works Department FROM: Sarady Long_ SUBJECT: RUSSIAN UKRANIAN PAROUSIA SDA CHURCH - (11-105157-00-UP) 1860 S 336TH ST The Public Works Traffic Division has reviewed the submitted material and provides the following technical comments. Street Lights The design does not need to be approved as part of UP approval, however the applicant should perform due diligence to make sure that the conceptual plan is feasible. Below are technical design comments. 1. Identify 3-box type (1, 2 or 8) and if it is an existing or new j-box. If existing, verify whether capacity exist to add new circuit and conduit. 2. Provide streetlight pole number with station and offset. Please see example below: POLE SCHEDULE (Example) Pole No.** Street Pole Sta. Pole Offset Lamp Wattage Distribui 1 S 312t" St. 31+54.0 37.5' LT. 400 M-C-III 2 4`° Ave S 9+28.2 11.5 RT. 100 M-C-III ' � - Pole numbering shall be (XXXX-YY-AAZZ-BB) per Detail Sheet Mounting I Master Circuit Lion Height Arm No. - 35' 6' Ex. 30' 12' A Service I _FEx. 31Z NEW 3. Identify conduit size and runs. Conduit size shall be 2" min. PVC schedule 40 or 80. Use Schedule 80 for under driveways and street, per Standard Specs. Please see example of wiring schedule below. Example -- Wiring schedule _ Run No. Circuit No. Conduit Conductors Remarks 1 A New 2" PVC New 1 - #8 Green 2 B New 2" PVC New 2 - New 1 - #8 Green 4. Need to identify power source for connection and coordinate with PSE for connection. Site Plan Review Comments 1. The driveway on 20th Ave S should be designed to provide safe and efficient traffic circulation. The proposed angle approach should be straightened and line up with the existing driveway cut. Alternatively, the applicant may relocate the curb cut north to line up with the parking lot approach. Transportation Management Plan 1. Due to the proximity to residential neighborhood, staff is recommends using ITE 85"' percentile to derive parking demand in lieu of the average rate. This would ensure minimal impact to residential on -street parking. 2. The proposed overflow oi. to parking at the Lifeway Center Administiu_ ve Office will not likely be used due to the distance between the two locations. Parishioners would more likely Utili7.e the available on -street parking along 20th Ave S. Staff recommends coordinating with adjacent property to the north (CFC) for any parking overflow. 3. The queuing analysis based on Ohio DOT is riot acceptable. The analysis should be for the site peak period (either Saturday or Sunday) and should include existing traffic on the road. Please verify that the NB & EB queues from 20t" Ave S & S 336th St. will not block the new driveways. Furthermore, the analysis should also include all vehicles entering and leaving the driveways. Please use either the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method or Synchro software to calculate/estimate the expected queue. A sample printout from synchro is attached. Queues 4052: S 336 St & 20 Av S 8/17/2012 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT N81- NBR SBL SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 438 2 24 672 4 44 86 51 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.03 0.48 0.02 0.32 0.31 0.19 Control Delay 5.3 10.8 2.5 5.2 10.4 37.0 20.2 44.9 12.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.3 10.8 2.5 5.2 10.4 37.0 20.2 44.9 12.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 241 1 3 147 3 0 61 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m3 88 m0 16 467 10 25 82 26 Internal Link Dist (ft) 834 1457 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 125 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 578 1391 1363 754 1390 252 259 291 304 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.03 0.48 0.02 0.17 0.30 0.17 Intersection Summary Description: July 12, 2012 - All Traffic Data m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 2012 TMC Volumes on Existing Network Synchro 7 - Report PW - SL Page 1 2. The proposed overflow oi. -ce parking at the Lifeway Center Administi-..re Office will not likely be used due to the distance between the two locations. Parishioners would more likely utilize the available on -street parking along 20th Ave S. Staff recommends coordinating with adjacent property to the north (CFC) for any parking overflow. 3. The queuing analysis based on Ohio DOT is not acceptable. The analysis should be for the site peak period (either Saturday or Sunday) and should include existing volume on the road. Furthermore, the analysis should also include vehicle entering and leaving the site. Please use either the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method or Synchro software to calculate/estimate the expected queue. A sample printout from synchro is attached. CITY OF �. Federal Way DATE: August 17, 2012 TO: Janet Shull FROM: Sarady Long MEMORANDUM Public Works Department SUBJECT: RUSSIAN UKRANIAN PAROUSIA SDA CHURCH - (11-105157-00-UP) 1860 S 336TH ST The Public Works Traffic Division has reviewed the submitted material and provide the following technical comments. Street Lights The design does not need to be approved as part of UP approval, however the applicant should perform due diligence to make sure that the conceptual plan is feasible. Below are technical design comments. 1. Identify ]-box type (1, 2 or 8) and if it is an existing or new j-box. If existing, verify whether capacity exist to add new circuit and conduit. 2. Provide streetlight pole number with station and offset. Please see example below: POLE SCHEDULE (Example) Pole No.** Street Pole Sta. Pole Offset Lamp Wattage Distribution Mounting Height Mast Arm Circuit No. Service 1 S 312t" St. 31+54.0 37.5' LT. 400 M-C-III 35' 6' Ex. Ex. 312" 2 4" Ave S 9+28.2 11.5 RT. 100 M-C-III 30' 12' A NEW ** - Pole numbering shall be (XXXX-YY-AAZZ-BB) per Detail Sheet 3. Identify conduit size and runs. Conduit size shall be 2" min. PVC schedule 40 or 80. Use Schedule 80 for under driveways and street, per Standard Specs. Please see example of wiring schedule below. Example — Wiring schedule Run No. Circuit No. Conduit Conductors Remarks 1 A New 2" PVC New 1 - #8 Green New 2 - New 1 - #8 Green 2 B New 2" PVC 4. Need to identify power source for connection and coordinate with PSE for connection. Site Plan Review Comments 1. The driveway on 20th Ave S should be designed to provide safe and efficient traffic circulation. The proposed angle approach should be straightened and line up with the existing driveway cut. Alternatively, the applicant may relocate the curb cut north to line up with the parking lot approach. Transportation Management Plan 1. Due to the proximity to residential neighborhood, staff is recommends using ITE 85th percentile to derive parking demand in lieu of the average rate. This would ensure minimal impact to residential on -street parking. CITY OF .n Federal Way DATE: March 22, 2012 TO: Janet Shull FROM: Sarady Long MEMORANDUM Public Works Department SUBJECT: RUSSIAN UKRANIAN PAROUSIA SDA CHURCH - (11-105157-00-UP) 1860 S 336TH ST The Public Works Traffic Division has reviewed the submitted material and provides the following technical comments: 1. The submitted sight distance analysis depicted adequate sight line for full access onto S 336th St. However, the driveway is located within the eastbound left turn pocket. Staff is supportive in allowing full access and will restrict this driveway to right -in and right -out at such time it's deems necessary for safety. Transportation Management Plan 2. The submitted transportation management plan is not adequate to address traffic impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The TMP should be revised to include the following information. ■ Parking demands using ITE 85 percentile and number of stalls provided ■ Uses on site, days and hours of uses (schedules of services) including number of people ■ Peak parking demands for the site including any special event ■ Traffic circulation and potential queuing issue that may impact adjacent street ■ Parking overflow during special event if any HCM Signalized Intersection C,,acity Analysis 4052: S 336 St & 20 Av S 8117/2012 ~r f- t-- *-- t * ---* --► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SSR Lane Configurations + r 11� r r Volume (vph) 16 399 2 23 575 70 3 0 34 68 0 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% 3% 0% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1773 1866 1599 1758 1818 1697 1476 1773 1599 Fit Permitted 0.33 1.00 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 611 1866 1599 855 1818 1697 1476 1773 1599 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.79 0.79 0.79 Adj. Flow (vph) 18 438 2 24 599 73 4 0 44 86 0 51 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 41 0 0 44 Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 438 1 24 670 0 4 0 3 86 0 7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 6% 6% 6% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt custom custom custom custom Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 84.7 82.6 83.7 86.9 83.7 10.3 9.2 20.7 15.6 Effective Green, g (s) 84.7 82.6 83.7 86.9 83.7 10.3 9.2 20.7 15.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.69 0.70 0.72 0.70 0.09 0.08 0.17 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 452 1284 1115 643 1268 146 113 306 208 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.23 0.00 cO.00 cO.37 0.00 cO.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.34 0.00 0.04 0.53 0.03 0.03 0.28 0.03 Uniform Delay, d1 6.4 7.6 5.5 4.9 8.7 50.3 51.3 43.2 45.6 Progression Factor 0.97 1.23 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 O.0 Delay (s) 6.2 10.0 3.1 4.9 10.3 50.3 51.3 43.4 45.E Level of Service A A A A B D D D C Approach Delay (s) 9.8 10.1 51.2 44.2 Approach LOS A B D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 15.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: July 12, 2012 - All Traffic Data c Critical Lane Group 2012 TMC Volumes on Existing Network Synchro 7 - Report PW - SL Page 1 n_ 7 4 0 l 4 g�E 4 g Q ICI � r s�3C>A� lb M M i I � V CITY OF 4A Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church Federal Way File No.11-105157-00-UP PUBLIC HEARING January 30, 2013 2:00 p.m. Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers 33325 8`h Avenue South Report Prepared by: Senior Planner Janet Shull, AICP January 22, 2013 Table of Contents I. PROJECT INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND....................................................................................1 H. REQUESTED DECISION AND PROJECT PROPOSAL.............................................................................1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW...............................................................................................................2 IV. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON LAND USE APPLICATION.......................................................................2 V. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES....................................................................................2 VI. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SITE AND VICINITY......................................................................3 VII. SITE DESIGN.....................................................................................................................................3 VIM COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES...................................................................................................5 IX. TRANSPORTATION............................................................................................................................5 X. ANALYSIS OF FWRC 19.70.150(3) PROCESS IV DECISION CRITERIA ................... ....I I.....................6 XI. STATEMENT OF FACTS & CONCLUSIONS..........................................................................................7 XII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION...............................................................................................................8 LISTOF EXHIBITS........................................................................................................................................... 9 I. PROJECT INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND Name of Project: Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church City File No(s): Process IV File 11-105157-UP & Environmental File 12-100185-SE Staff Recommendation: Approval with Conditions Summary of Proposal: A proposed church development on one multifamily zoned parcel approximately 1.27 acres in size. The project consists of a one-story, 9,126 square -foot church building with parking, landscaping, and stormwater improvements. Site Location: The subject property's formal address is 1860 South 336`h Street, Federal Way, WA 98003. Subject property is represented by the following parcel identification number: 797820-0100. A vicinity map is enclosed as Exhibit A. Applicant/Agent: Don Kirkman, Architect, LLC, PO Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071-0816 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Designations: Multifamily Residential and RM 3600, respectively Key Dates: December 30, 2011, Master Land Use Application Submitted January 25, 2012, Application Determined Complete January 27, 2012, Public Notice Pursuant to FWRC Procedures April, 6, 2012, Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) Issued December 17, 2012, Community Design Guidelines Decision Issued January 11, 2013, Notice of Public Hearing Pursuant to FWRC Procedures City Staff Representative: Senior Planner Janet Shull, AICP, 253-835-2644 U. REQUESTED DECISION & PROJECT PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting a Process IV "Hearing Examiner" decision pursuant to Chapter 19.70 of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC). Applicants proposing church developments within a multifamily residential zoned neighborhood shall submit a Process W Master Land Use (MLU) application pursuant to FWRC 19.205.100. As shown on the site plans (Exhibit B), the project applicant proposes to construct a one-story, 9,126 square -foot church/sanctuary building at 1860 South 336"' Street. Additional proposed site improvements concurrent with building construction include clearing and grading to accommodate: 1) new stormwater conveyance, treatment and detention facility; 2) parking lot area with capacity to provide parking for 83 vehicles, lighting, and fenced garbage/recycling enclosure; 3) two 30 to 35 foot wide private driveways with access from South 336h Street and 20`' Avenue South; and 4) perimeter and parking lot landscaping. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed improvements exceed State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) flexible thresholds adopted by the city, specifically FWRC 14.50.030(1)(c), "For office, commercial, recreational, service or storage buildings up to 4,000 square feet gross floor area, and up to 20 parking spaces." Therefore, an environmental threshold determination is required prior to any land use decision or building permit. Determination of Nonsignificance — Following staff review of the environmental checklist (Exhibit C), the city's Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the proposal on April 6, 2012 (Exhibit D). Agencies with jurisdiction were notified of the determination and public notice was provided via procedures within the city's environmental policy. Three comments were received (Exhibit E) and no appeals were received regarding the environmental determination. IV. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON LAND USE APPLICATION As of the date of this report, three comments have been received on the notice of application/ optional Determination of Nonsignificance and two additional comments were received on the Notice of Public Hearing and are summarized as follows (also see exhibit E): 1. Residents on neighboring properties expressed concern with the perimeter landscaping and potential for blockage of solar access to their yards. The applicant revised the proposed landscaping to specify large shrubs and small trees to limit the height of plantings, while still meeting minimum perimeter landscape requirements. 2. Comments were received regarding potential impacts of traffic and parking in the neighborhood. The applicant has worked with the neighboring church property located immediately south of the subject site to allow for overflow parking as the church services are on different days of the week. 3. Two comment letters were received in response to the notice of public hearing. One commenter expressed general disapproval of the proposed church use on the subject site. The second cornrnenter expressed general support of the project, but would like the applicant to consider constructing a fence along the west side of the property. V. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application: 1. Development Review Committee (DRC), consisting of Community Development Services Planning and Building Divisions; Public Works Development Services and Traffic Divisions; Lakehaven Utility District; and South King Fire and Rescue. DRC comments have been incorporated into this report where applicable. 2. All property owners within 300 feet of the site were mailed the Notice of Application (NOA) January 27, 2012, and Notice of Public Hearing on January 16, 2013. The NOA and Notice of Public Hearing were posted on the site, published in the Federal Way Mirror, and posted on the city's official notice boards, in accordance with the city's public notice requirements. Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 2 of 9 Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church File Number 11-105157-UP / Doc m 62298 3. In accordance with SEPA and FWRC Title 14, "Environmental Policy," all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site, and all affected agencies and tribes, were notified of the proposed action and the city's environmental determination. In addition, the site was posted and notice placed in the newspaper and on the city's official notice boards. VI. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SITE AND VICINITY The subject property is comprised of one multifamily residentially zoned parcel totaling 1.27 acres (55,321 square feet). Existing built environment includes one single family home with accessory structures and driveways on the South 336th Street and 20'' Avenue South frontages. Surrounding land uses consist of a mix of single-family residential, multifamily residential., and church. Adjacent properties east, north, and west are also zoned RM 3600. FWRC 19.205.100 allows church uses within RM 3600 zones with Process IV land use approval. VII. SITE DESIGN a) Church Building Improvements — The applicant proposes a one-story, 9,126 square -foot church/sanctuary building to be located on the central portion of the subject property. The proposed structure will contain multiple modulations awnings, a public plaza at the southwest corner of the building, and foundation landscaping. As shown on the site plan (Exhibit B), the furthest linear building dimensions measure 98 feet in length and 96 feet in width. As shown on the exterior elevation plans (Exhibit F), the proposed building will measure 29.5 feet above average building elevation at its highest point (ridge height). The proposed building height meets FWRC 19.205.100 maximum ABE standards of 30 feet. b) Stormwater Improvements — Pursuant to thresholds within FWRC 16.25.020, full drainage review is required; therefore, the applicant must comply with cone and special requirements of the 2009 King County Surface Design Manual (KCSWDM) and Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM. As detailed in the applicant's preliminary TIR by Rupert Engineering, Inc. revised November 3, 2012 (Exhibit I), and utility plan (Exhibit I), the applicant will provide stormwater flow control and water quality treatment via a combined stormwater/engineered wetland and detention pond. Stormwater flows from the development's impervious surfaces will be collected in 12 catch basins and conveyed to a combined detention/stormwater wetland facility on the southeastern corner of the property. The project will be required to meet Conservation Flow Control and Enhanced Basic Water Quality standards. The applicant shall obtain final engineering approval from the Public Works Department during the building permit stage of development. c) Parking Lot Improvements —Pursuant to FWRC 19.205.100, parking stall quantity for church uses is determined via Transportation Improvement Plan (TMP) analysis completed by a professional traffic engineer. As shown in the applicant's TUT (Exhibit J) the applicant's consultant engineer recommends a minimum of 82 stalls be provided onsite. As shown on the civil site plan (Exhibit J), 83 parking stalls will be provided. Parking space and aisle dimensions shall be designed using the "Parking Lot Design Criteria" document adopted by reference within FWRC 19.130.160(2). Typical parking dimensions shown on the site plan are 8.5 feet wide and 16 feet long, with 25.5-foot drive aisles. As Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church Page 3 of 9 File Number 11-105157-UP / Doc 1D 62298 permitted by FWRC 19.130.170, up to 25% of the provided stalls may be compact. The project applicant has proposed 20 compact stalls measuring 8 feet wide and 15 feet long, with 25.5-foot drive aisles. Space and aisle dimensions meet the above -referenced design criteria. Access to the parking area will be provided via two 30-foot-wide private driveways with access to South 3362' Street and 20`h Avenue South. Pursuant to FWRC 19.125.070(2), parking areas that accommodate more than 50 stalls shall provide 22 square feet per stall of Type IV landscaping within the surface parking lot area. As shown on the submitted landscape plan (Exhibit In, 1,938 square feet of interior lot landscaping is provided, exceeding the 1,826 square -foot nzinirnum required. Parking areas adjacent to residential zones shall provide Type I landscaping within the required perimeter landscape areas. Further discussion on this requirement is detailed in the following landscaping section. d) Landscaping— Pursuant to FWRC 19.125.060, a Type III landscaping screen at least 20-feet in width along all public rights -of -way and Type II landscaping 10 feet in width along all perimeter lot lines is required. FWRC 19.125.070(5)(b) requires the perimeter landscaping screen increase to a higher density Type I landscaping screen for all parking areas adjacent to residential zones. The submitted landscaping plan provides a 15-foot Type I screen along the west and north perimeter, and 20-foot to 30-foot deep Type III screen along the east and south perimeter. A 6-foot tall wood fence is proposed along the northern lot line and an existing sight -obscuring fence already exists along the western lot line. Landscaping along the northern property line was modified from the original proposal to address comments received by residents of single family homes immediately to the north who were concerned about tall trees potentially blocking their solar access. The landscaping plans approved per the Director's Design Decision (Exhibit M) meet with minimum FWRC requirements utilizing plant species that will not grow much taller than the fence height, while still providing a dense buffer to block views of the parking area. Perimeter landscaping along the southern anA� property frontages incorporate landscaped surface water/water quality facilities within a 30-foot wide planted area. This is allowed under FWRC 19.125.100(7), "Modification Options" and the proposed landscaping provides screening equal to or greater than the nummum required under FWRC 19.125.060. e) Tree Retention/Replacement — Pursuant to FWRC 19.120.130, the multifamily zoned property required tree density is 30 tree units per acre, or 39 units (1.3 acres x 30). The applicant proposes to retain 10 tree units and add an addition 61 tree units per proposed landscape plantings, exceeding the minimum requirement of tree units per acre. f) Lighting— As shown on the lighting plan (Exhibit L), pedestrian and parking lot areas surrounding the church building will be illuminated via 12 lighting standards within the parking area with full cut off shields on 20-foot poles. The pedestrian plaza will contain four bollard style lighting fixtures 48 inches in height. g) Garbage & Recycling Enclosure —As shown on the site plan (Exhibit B), garbage and recycling receptacles will be screened by a six-foot wood fence. Further screening will be provided with landscaping along the base of the wall as shown in the landscaping plan (Exhibit 1). The enclosure space will measure 144 square feet, exceeding the 65 square -foot minimum prescribed within FWRC 19.125.150(7)(d). Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 4 of 9 Russian Ulaanian Parousia SDA Church File Number 11-105157-UP / Doc m 62298 VIII. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES Pursuant to Process IV `Hearing Examiner's Decision' guidelines, the Director of Community and Economic Development issued a written decision regarding the application's Community Design Guidelines on December 17, 2012 (Exhibit Al). The effect of this decision is contingent upon Process IV project approval by the Hearing Examiner. Adoption of the design decision is included as a condition of Process IV approval, as recommended herein. DL TRANSPORTATION a) Access — The applicant has provided vehicular/pedestrian access and circulation consistent with the goals and policies for transportation, as set forth in Chapter 3 of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (1~ WCP)- "Cite subject property has two vehicle access points (one on South 336"' Street and one on 20`h Avenue South). These access points meet the city's access management of 150-foot spacing requirement (FWRC 19.135.280). The applicant's traffic engineer also performed Sight Distance Analysis and Turn Lane Warrant Analysis at the proposed access points to ensure safe and efficient traffic operation (revised TIA prepared by Heath & Associates, November 2, 2012). Pedestrian access is provided from South 336'h Street and from 20`h Avenue South via two six -foot -wide sidewalks. A bicycle rack will be provided near the 20'` Avenue South Street entrance. The site is adjacent to a minor arterial (South 336`h Street) and a minor collector (20'h Avenue South) thereby meeting FWRC 19.205.100 special regulation #3, "...the subject property must be adjacent to a collector or arterial right-of-way." b) Concurrency (FWRC 19.90) — As a component of the Process IV MLU application, the applicant was required to undergo traffic concurrency analysis pursuant to the state Growth Management Act, goals and policies of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and FWRC Chapter 19.90, "Transportation Concurrency Management." The city's Traffic Division reviewed the concurrency application and determined all intersections impacted by one or more weekday evening peak hour trips would meet the city's Level of Service standards with programmed improvements. A Capacity Reserve Certificate was issued by the City Traffic Engineer January 17, 2012, and vested 5 PM hour trips to this project. c) Impact Fee (FWRC 19.91) — The applicant will be subject to the city's transportation impact fee. The fee will be calculated based on the fee rate in effect at the time a complete building permit application is submitted. The fee shall be paid prior to permit issuance. d) Public Improvements — Pursuant to FWRC 19.135.040, the applicant is required to provide improvements along the frontage on South 336d` Street and 20"' Avenue South in accordance with the adopted street section type "K" and "R" respectively from the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. 1) 20`h Avenue South — The property frontage was improved by the Christian Faith Center (CFC) development, with the exception of street trees and street lights, which must be installed by the applicant. These improvements shall be completed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 2) South 3361h Street — No street improvements are required as frontage was improved by the CFC development. Staff Reportto the Hearing Examiner Page 5 of 9 Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church File Number 11-105157-UP / Doc ID 62298 X. ANALYSIS OF FWRC 19.70.150(3) - PROCESS IV DECISIONAL CRITERIA The applicant must meet five decisional criteria pursuant to FWRC 19.70.150(3). Staff has provided the following analysis of Process IV criteria: 1. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. The application is subject to the 2010 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The compreliensive plan is used, among other documents, as a basis for implementing regulations such as zoning, critical areas requirements, and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The proposed church improvement has undergone site plan review, environmental review, and must comply with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP). The Process IV request was reviewed and determined to be consistent with the goals and policies contained in FWCP. 2. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of this chapter and all other applicable laws. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. The Process IV request has been reviewed under SEPA; the FWCP; all applicable provisions of FWRC including Title 14 "Environmental Policy, Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code"; and is consistent with all applicable provisions and laws, provided all recommended conditions of approval are met. 3. It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. The proposed church is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The proposal will provide adequate and safe pedestrian circulation via delineated pathways within the subject property and to adjacent streets and sidewalks. No adverse impacts to adjacent parcels are anticipated as a result of the proposal. The Process IV request has been reviewed under SEPA; the FWCP; all applicable provisions of FWRC; and construction permit plans will be reviewed utilizing the 2009 International Building Code with Washington State amendments. Proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions and laws, provided all recommended conditions of approval are met. 4. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. No significant adverse transportation impacts were identified by the City of Federal Way in the concurrency analysis or DNS issued for the proposed action. Through the city's transportation concurrency management policy, the Traffic Division has determined the city's Level of Service will not change due to the church's redevelopment proposal. The city's water/sewer purveyor, Lakehaven Utility District, reviewed the proposal and found the water and sewer services to be adequate to serve the proposed project. 5. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. Staff Response — This criterion has been met. The proposed two vehicle access points will provide adequate circulation for enteringlexiting vehicles. The subject property is adjacent to Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 6 of 9 Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church File Number 11-105157-UP / Doc m 62298 and has access points to a minor arterial (South 336`s Street) and a minor collector (20'b Avenue South) meeting the FWRC 19.205.100(3) requirement. Pedestrian access will be provided via six foot wide concrete walkways leading from both South 336t' Street and 20t' Avenue South to the church entrances. M. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS Based on an analysis of the Process IV application, the environmental record, and applicable decisional criteria, the Department of Community and Economic Development finds that: a) Proposed improvements require review under the city's land use Process W `Hearing Examiner' pursuant to provisions outlined in FWRC 19.200.050, "Required Review Process." Applicable regulations and policies used to review the proposal included, but were not limited to: Federal Way Revised Code Titles 14, 16, and 19; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual with Federal Way Addendum; Public Works Department Development Standards; and State Environmental Policy Act rules Chapter 197-11. b) Proposed improvements include the construction of a 9,126 square -foot church/sanctuary building, parking area to accommodate 83 vehicles, pedestrian amenities, landscaping, and above -ground stormwater facility. c) An environmental checklist was reviewed by city staff, and other agencies with jurisdiction. Following review of the proposal and environmental reports submitted by the applicant, the city's Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on April 6, 2012. Three conuuents were received on the Notice of Application/Optional DNS (Exhibit E). No appeals were received regarding the environmental threshold determination. d) The following are general dimensional regulations pursuant to FWRC 19.200.050, "Use Zone Chart." i. Minimum Lot Size — 7,200 square feet / Proposal — 55,321 square feet I Required Yards (setbacks) — 30 feet front, 30 feet side, and 30 feet rear / Proposal 30 feet front, 30 feet east side, 141 feet west side, and 60 feet rear iii. Lot Coverage — 75 percent maximum / Proposal -17 percent iv. Height — 30 feet ABE / Proposal — 29.5 feet ABE The proposed site plan meets lot size, required yard, lot coverage, and height requirements. e) FWRC 19.200.050(4) requires church uses within RM zones abut collectors or arterial rights - of -way. The subject property is adjacent to South 336`h Street and 20t` Avenue South, which are designated a Minor Arterial and Minor Collector, respectively, by the FWCP. f) The church improvements will generate five new Weekday peak hour trips. The city's Traffic Division reviewed the concurrency application and determined all intersections impacted by one or more weekday evening peak hour trips would meet the city's Level of Service standards with prograninied improvements. A Capacity Reserve Certificate was issued by the City Traffic Engineer on January 17, 2012, and vested 5 PM hour trips to this project. Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 7 of 9 Russian Ukmnian Parousia SDA Church File Number 11-105157-UP / Doc m 62298 g) The Public Works Director and Traffic Engineer have reviewed the project and concluded that the proposal complies with city's codes, policies, and regulations pertaining to site access, street layout, and design. Twentieth Avenue South is designated as a minor collector and will be improved to include street trees and street lights. h) The applicant will be subject to the city's transportation impact fee. The fee will be calculated based on the fee rate in effect at the time a complete building permit application is submitted. The fee shall be paid prior to permit issuance. i) The amount of proposed impervious surfaces required full drainage review by the Public Works Department. The subject property is within areas designated Conservation Flow Control and Enhanced Basic Water Quality, which requires the applicant to design a stormwater facility meeting the applicable requirements of the 2009 KCSWDM. Flow control and water quality requirements will be met via a series of catch basins conveying stormwater to an onsite combined detention and stormwater wetland prior to downstream release. j) The applicant's traffic engineer has provided analysis that 82 parking stalls will adequately serve full occupancy of the church. The site plan provides 83 parking stalls. k) The Director of the Community and Economic Development Department has found the proposal meets applicable requirements of FWRC Chapter 19.115 "Community Design Guidelines" and issued Design Approval December 17, 2012. The effect of this decision is contingent upon Process IV project approval by the Hearing Examiner. No appeals of the decision were filed with the city. 1) Final engineering and construction plans related, but not limited to buildings, landscaping, roads, stormwater, and lighting will be reviewed during the building permit stage and must meet all applicable Public Works Department Development Standards and the 2009 International Building Code standards adopted by the Department of Community and Economic Development Building Division. m) As analyzed previously, city staff has concluded that the church improvements have met all Process IV decisional criteria pursuant to FWRC 19.70.150(3). n) Pursuant to FWRC 19.70.150(2), the Hearing Examiner shall issue a decision on the Process IV Master Land Use application within 10 working days following the close of the public hearing. XIL STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis derived from this report, the Department of Community and Economic Development recommends approval of the site improvements as depicted on the site, landscaping, and civil plan sheets entered as exhibits to this staff report, and other documents within the official project file subject to the conditions listed below: 1. The applicant shall obtain engineering approval from the Public Works Department and commercial building approval from the Department of Community and Economic Development prior to site construction. Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 8 of 9 Russian Ulaanian Parousia SDA Church File Number l 1-105157-UP / Doc m 62298 LIST OF Ex mas Exhibit A Vicinity Map Exhibit B Site Plans Prepared by Don Kirkman (Resubmitted November 9, 2012) Exhibit C Environmental Checklist, Received December 30, 2011 Exhibit D Determination of Nonsignificance, April 6, 2012 Exhibit E Copies of Comment Letters From Citizens Exhibit F Downstream Analysis Prepared by Rupert Engineering, Inc (Submitted December 30, 2011) Exhibit G Stormwater Plan Prepared by Rupert Engineering, Inc (Resubmitted November 9, 2012) Exhibit H Architectural Elevation Plans Prepared by Don Kirkman (Submitted December 30, 2011) Exhibit I Civil Engineering Plans Prepared by Rupert Engineering, Inc. (Resubmitted November 9, 2012) Exhibit J Transportation Management Plan Prepared by Rupert Engineering, Inc (Resubmitted November 9, 2012) Exhibit K Landscape Plans prepared by Landscape and Irrigation Company (Resubmitted September 14, 2012) Exhibit L Lighting Plan Prepared by Colorado Confort Consult Engineers (Resubmitted July 19, 2012) Exhibit M Director's Design Decision with Findings Issued December 17, 2012 Note: Copies of the exhibits are not attached to all copies of this report. All exhibits have been provided to the Hearing Examiner. Copies of exhibits may be obtained upon request at the City of Federal Way's Department of Community and Economic Development. TRANSMITTED TO THE PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: Hearing Examiner — Phil Olbrechts, Ogden Murphy Wallace, 1601 5`h Avenue, Suite 2100, Seattle, WA 98101 Project Agent — Don Kirkman, Architect, PO Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 Federal Way Staff— Janet Shull, Ann Dower, and Sarady Lang Parties of Record — Albin and Shirley Gulbraa, 33357 20'h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Tamara ling, 2100 South 336`h Street, #R6, Federal Way, WA 98003 Gary Robertson, 2100 South 336" Street, #G-1, Federal Way WA 98003-8967 Barry and Charlene Turnbull, 33355 20'h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner Page 9 of 9 Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church File Number 11-105157-UP / Doc tD 62298 1pvw -kA P« AKA by F3 ec,K j r ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OF RUSSIAN UKRAINIAN PAROUSIA SDA CHURCH 1860 SOUTH 336TH ST. FEDERAL WAY, WA FOR WASHINGTON CONFERENCE OF SDA 3229 WEYERHAEUSER WAYSOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA KA JOB NO.2606 PO Box 816 Auburn, WA 98071 (253) 833 7910, Fax (253) 833 7915 RECEIVED DEC 3 0 2011 CITY Of FEDERAi WAY CDs A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church 2. Name of applicant: Don R. Kirkman - Architect 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: PO Box 816, Auburn, WA 98071 253-833-7910 4. Date � hec�cli1t prepared: 10 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way - The Environmental Review is a component of the process IV land use application. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): construction, summer 2012 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None known 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No Bulletin H050 — December 22, 2005 Page 2 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. None known 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. small church seating 267 - sq. ft building area - 8832 sq. ft. single story - type VB construction. Lot size: 1.3+ acres. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. street address: 1860 S. 336th St. Federal Way Legal: tract 20, state plot in sec 16, township 21, North, range 4 East, in King county Washington B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one) T rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1.50 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. sandy/gravel l Checklist Bulletin #050 — December 22, 2005 Paae 3 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmenta d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Don't -know e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. minimal grading required - no fill or import soils water retention pond required - removed soil will be used on the property. cut: 9600 cu. ft. fill: 9600 cu. ft. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Site will be protected with filter erosion design by civil engineer: answer is no. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 68% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. during earth work, provide erosion control screening around property. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. automobile exhause - parking 87 cars. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. none known Bulletin 9050 — December 22, 2005 Page 4 of IS k:�&landouts\Environmental Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any_ 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is.there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. small creek about 1/2 block to the west of the property - creek name, Hylebos Creek 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. no 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. site surface water retention pond cut: 9600 cu. yds. fill: 9600 cu. yds. cut and fill to be placed on site - no removal 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. no 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. no Bulletin 050 — December 22, 2005 Page 5 of IS k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground. 1) Will. ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No discharges into the ground. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. all site water wil be retained in engineered storm water retention pond. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No Bulletin #OSO — December 22, 2005 Page 6 of IS kAHandoutsEnvironmental Checklist d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. all ground water is retained on the property by engineered absorption pond. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _41 shrubs x grass pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plant: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Site has no trees, shrubs or other plants. Entire sit has grass only. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Landscaping design by landscape architect and will be installed as per landscape design requirements, City of Federal Way See LoknAS cape_ S►�briNr*4 Let - Bulletin #050 — December 22, 2005 Page 7 of l8 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any -birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds hawk, heron, eagle, songbirdother mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, 02, r fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Don't know of any endangered species c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Don't know d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. New trees and landscaping will attract birds 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical heat pumps for heating & air Conditioning No manufacturing. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No - not at all Bulletin #050 — December 22, 2005 Page 8 of IS k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. Building will be designed to meet or exceed all Federal and local energy use requirements. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Medical - a person at the church services might have an emergency medical problem. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. PhaseI soil tests on graound contaminates or gases, etc. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Traffic only 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise from the site 8am to 5pm Monday thru Friday - very low level - not a large construction project. Bulletin 9050 — December 22, 2005 Page 9 of 1S k:Wandouts\Environmental Checklist 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. No work will be don on the weekends. The project will comply with the City of Federal Way noise standards. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Property use currently is a 3-bedroom, single family home. Residens on North property line, streets on East and South property line, and an apartment complex on the West property line. ap Ghlrestiar> F-aCtr, CV\tex CCFc-) chxrch iS lloca.-keA to tv-c eo-%--t a.CVDsS S . 3 310-vt%- %JM e-C_+- b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Single story, 3-bedroom private home. Cyr rag��sl�d iS � '�► an 1-k pm"' d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? 3-bedroom home will be demolished on site. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? multi -family residential (RM3600) zone f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? multi-famliy residnetial Bulletin #050 — December 22, 2005 Page 10 of 18 kAHandouts\Environmental Checklist g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Don't know. ,V, 0 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally critical area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 2 people - pastor and secretary - both part-time j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? none - the existing house was vacant when the property was .purchased. No one was required to move out. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. Project architect has taken into consideration local housing and apartments to design a structure compatible with the neighborhood architecture, plus considered the City of Federal Way arthitectural standards. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. N/A k:U landouts\Environmental Checklist Bulletin #050 — December 22, 2005 Page I I of IS b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Tallest building height is 30' Principle exterior material is stucco - multi -colored b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. orientation of parking lot behind church building to screen cars - featuring landscaping on front and side roads. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No glare - no large glass areas. Bulletin 050 — December 22, 2005 Page 12 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Glare would only result from window glass, and the church has low, small window areas. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Celebration Park, Easter Lake and Steel Lake Park b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Np c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. No Bulletin #050 — December 22, 2005 Page 13 of 18 Uklandouts\Environmental Checklist 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None proposed 14. TtANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Streets shown on site plan vicinity map b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Don't know. 1/4 mile + to bus stop c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 87 parking spaces. Bulletin H050 — December 22, 2005 Paae 14 of IS k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Church meets at 9:00 AM on Saturday's with expected 100 - 120 cars arriving and departing at 12:30 PM. Average weekday trips 5 - 8 car trips. Wednesday and Friday evenings 20-30 car trip for prayer meeting at 7:30 PM arrival and 9:00 PM departure. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Do not believe the traffic hours on Saturday's and week days, and evening prayer meetings will impact traffic. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No Bulletin tt050 — December 22, 2005 Page 15 of IS kA [andoutAEnvironmental Checklist b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No correlation 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: septic system, other b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Lakehaven Utilities providing water and sewer C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. SIGNATURE: DATE SUBMITTED: 42 ` /— /' pm� /�ssisF�r�-� P►an��' Bulletin #050 — December 22, 2005 Page 16 of I8 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the proposal, of the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, and if they are likely to affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. I- How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Do not know how the proposal wold be likely to increase any discharges. The size and use of the facility is fixed with no prospect of additions or growth. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases: No increase as stated above. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposal will not affect plants, animals, fish or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life: Site plan designed to insure no surface water run-off fish or marine life. Wheel stops on parking lot will out of plant beds and church members will be asked to carefully and not run over any animals on the way to church. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy of natural resources? By use of natural gas and electric power. to damage keep cars drive and from Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources: Building designed to meet all current Federal and State energy code requirements. Bulletin #050 — December 22, 2005 Page 17 of IS k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist % J 4. How would the -proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally-c,�itical areasOr areag Aesignated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodpja" or grime farmlands? Do not know Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. Don't know Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? none on transportation - size of church seating fixed with no growth - gas prices go up - people will use public transportation, etc. Proposed measures to reduce of respond to such demands: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal (project) as state wil comply with all local, state and federal laws, engergy and environment. Bulletin 050 — December 22, 2005 Page Is of 18 kAHandouts\Environmental Checklist 0 RU[p(�)U3� [�ng (@STUcMp h@0 CONSULTING ENGINEERS/CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church Downstream Analysis Coil Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church 1860 South 336 h Street Federal Way, WA FOR Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventist 32229 Weyerhaeuser Way South Federal Way, WA 98001 R.E.I. JOB NO. 11032 December 29, 2011 FFV ,7 XU(_ r /Z ?w P -Z._ RESU BSI ITTE D JUL 18 2012 1 G1n �Al +\/.11 ,u;,,i-,..-,nl.-,hh/Q. d+-In1 Post Office Box 836/Auburn, WA 98071 CDS 253-833-7776 Fax253-939-2168 Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church Proposed ]Pro'ect Descri tivn The project is to develop a new church facility for praising Jesus Christ on tax parcel 797820-0100 comprising of 1 acre or more. The new building will cover 8,832 square feet, parking and access drives will cover 28,818 square feet, and 17,675 square feet of landscaping. Site runoff will be collected and treated through a stormwater wetland enhanced basic detention and water quality treatment facility. Existing Downstream Conditions - Task 1 The Whole downstream system was just permitted through the City of federal for the development of the Christian Faith Center. All work material and closed conveyance system in S 336th St. have been designed and constructed to current engineering standards. See attached as -built plans for Christian Faith Center permit storm profile drawings. Eventually outfall into Hylebos Creek. The native section of Hylebos Creek south of S. 336b St and befor the Christian Life Care Center Pacific Hwy entrerance is not know to flood. We anticipate that this project will not have any adverse impact downstream of the drainage system since the developed peak flows from the site will not be increasing. See the map below for the quarter mile downstream length. Downstream'/ mile map. Existing upstream Conditions — Task 1 The project development will not do any working with -in the Right-of-way except for installation of one light pole and the connection of a storm pipe too a single catch basin on 336t' street. The upstream condition on 20th Ave will remain unaffected and untouched from their current conditions. No flooding or erosion impacts are anticipated due to this project. Review all available information in study area — Task 2 All new storm system available is the new Christian Faith Center work done by CES NW inc (plans attached). Field inspection — Task 3 Review of the site conferred with the attached Christian Faith Center plan as -built drawings. All catch basins and pipe are in good working condition and new conveyance pipe is clean and function as designed. Down stream drains a stem dMEli tion — Task 4 The down stream system is a completely new closed conveyance system constructed in 2008. Conveyance pipe in new 12 inch ductile Iron Pipe and ADS HDPE smooth wall N- 12 pipe. Catch basins and man holes are WSD®T standard pipe. The system should be able to handle predicted system flows. New church site is detaining half a 2 year peak flow and 50 year flow at original design flows. No aggravated flooding is anticipated. il,llRtia'10 N71l6D �.{1®'L�T.•llfld tlYb 4,A6 CC] 831N30 Hi1VJ NVUSNHO d NOILv11WLN00 aoi � 13�i5 �s e a a ®a IL i—. ula- $k 1 � Noavfl7111 W WA fki LOG 33S 9S IMS 33S am as �DIN30 HiIV3 NHIlSNH3 riOaaLaa►raa� aD� m 11M ms ® wou MWW WA m IMIM 33s Yg mn.o �9wkr•'1 = it �� m�mmelpr ae�®m�.ma s MO. MUM mm Llffiii'.Y, f �f, i � I �•:.t �� J� `' � � �. 'ice `' _ II ;1pp I r W !� ti iL v9pp ��. I�yyy i� • �� ..� NouanxuL� tio� x�d 1�s � � rauanxur� �� za11� r G C R V ■ 7'p�F'01� sa °'0c-ra [z'sa Is�rr � aanlm zrm. �w �ernrr+nr nKa � ca �k� 7�a m.-c ma �. arw eww � ter, �„ - - - •'^�a LJ t�31N30 Hlld3 NVLLSWHO Nmvnmm wJ m 13RIS MIS I • 'raj . �. 1 f k L k�l .T a I�'��» _ 4 ! _pi y `•'`. Ili mot' L• •�. .. i s... i 2 �eprB£ yuy�nnEii •1; .� wwvs y_ __LIL-•_ r fila I • �rar� < r !� 11r r �^ ri _.7 ___�_ 1 } 0 3 em o m I z o tr: U 16 g _ 1.2.2 CORE REQTJ,,.r,MENT 42: OFFSITE ANALYSIS 1.2.2 CORE REQUIREMENT ENT #2: OFFSITE ANALYSIS All proposed projects must submit an offsite analysis report that assesses potential offsite drainage and R water quality impacts associated with development of the project site and proposes appropriate mitigation E of those impacts. The initial permit submittal shall include, at minimum, a Level 1 downstream analysis m as described in Section 1.2.2.1 below. If impacts are identified, the proposed projects shall meet any T applicable problem -specific requirements specified in Section 1.2.2.2 (p. 1-28) for mitigation of impacts to drainage problems and Section 1.2.2.3 (p. 1-3 1) for mitigation of impacts to water quality problems. Intent: To identify and evaluate offsite flooding, erosion, and water quality problems that may be created or aggravated by the proposed project, and to ensure appropriate measures are provided for preventing creation or aggravation of those problems. In addition, this requirement is intended to ensure appropriate provisions are made, as needed, to mitigate other identified impacts associated with the quantity and quality of surface and storm water runoff from the project site (e.g., impacts to the hydrology of a wetland as may be identified by a "critical area report" per KCC 21A.24.110). The primary component of an offsite analysis report is the downstream analysis, which examines the drainage system within one -quarter mile downstream of the project site or farther as described in Section 1.2.2.1 below. It is intended to identify existing or potential/predictable downstream flooding, erosion, and water quality problems so that appropriate mitigation, as specified in Sections 122.2 and 1.22.3, can be provided to prevent aggravation of these problems. A secondary component of the offsite analysis report is an evaluation of the upstream drainage system to verify and document that significant flooding and erosion impacts will not occur as a result of the proposed project. The evaluation must extend upstream to a point where any backwater effects created by the project cease. ® EXEMPTION FPOM CORE REQUIREMENT #2 A proposed project is exempt from Core Requirement #2 if any one of the following is true: 1. DDES determines there is sufficient information for them to conclude that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the downstream and/or upstream drainage system, OR 2. The project adds less than 2,000 square feet of new impervious surface, AND less than 35,000 square feet of new pervious surface, AND does not construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth or that receives runoff from a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth, AND does not contain or lie adjacent to a landslide, steep slope, or erosion hazard area as defined in KCC 21A.06, OR 3. The project does not change the rate, volume, duration, or location of discharges to and from the project site (e.g., where existing impervious surface is replaced with other impervious surface having similar runoff -generating characteristics, or where pipe/ditch modifications do not change existing discharge characteristics). 1.2.2.1 DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS The level of downstream analysis required depends on specific site and downstream conditions. Each project submittal must include at least a Level I downstream analysis. Upon review of the Level I analysis, DDES may require a Level 2 or Level 3 analysis. If conditions warrant, additional, more detailed analysis may be required. The Level 1 downstream analysis is a qualitative survey of each downstream system and is the first step in identifying flooding or erosion problems as described below under "Downstream Drainage Problems Requiring Special Attention." The Level I analysis also identifies water quality problems as described below under "Downstream Water Quality Problems Requiring Special Attention." Each Level 1 analysis is composed of four tasks at a minimum: n Task 1: Define,and map the study area 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009 1-23 SECTION 1.2 CORE REQUIREMENTS ® Task 2: Review all available information on the study area ® Task 3: Field inspect the study area • Task 4: Describe the drainage system, and its existing and predicted drainage and water quality problems. Upon review of the Level 1 analysis, DDES may require a Level 2 or 3 downstream analysis, depending on the presence of existing or predicted flooding, erosion, or nuisance problems identified in the Level 1 analysis. Levels 2 and 3 downstream analysis quantify downstream flooding, erosion, or nuisance problems by providing information on the severity and frequency of an existing problem or the likelihood of creating a new problem. A Level 2 analysis is a rough quantitative analysis (non -survey field data, uniform flow analysis). Level 3 is a more precise analysis (e.g., survey field data, backwater analysis) of significant problems. If conditions warrant, additional, more detailed analysis may be required beyond Level 3. For Levels 2 and 3 downstream analysis, an additional Task 5, addressing mitigation of existing and potential flooding, erosion, or nuisance problems, will be required. Extent of Downstream Analysis The downstream analysis must consider the existing conveyance system(s) for a minimum flowpath distance downstream of one -quarter mile and beyond that, as needed, to reach a point where the project site area constitutes less than 15% of the tributary area. This minimum distance may be increased as follows: ® 'Task 2 of a Level 1 downstream analysis (described in detail in Section 2.3.1.1) is a review of all available information on the downstream area and is intended to identify existing drainage and water quality problems. In all cases, this information review shall extend one mile downstream of the project site. The existence of flooding or erosion problems further downstream may extend the one-quarter- mile/15% minimum distance for other tasks to allow evaluation of impacts from the proposed development upon the identified flooding or erosion problems. The existence of documented water quality problems beyond the one -quarter mile/15% distance may in some cases require additional mitigation of impacts as determined necessary by DDES based on the type and severity of problem. ® If a project's impacts to flooding or erosion problems are mitigated by improvements to the downstream conveyance system, the downstream analysis will extend a minimum of one -quarter mile beyond the improvement. This is necessary because many such improvements result in a reduction of stormwater storage or an increase in peak flows from the problem location. ® At their discretion, DDES may extend the downstream analysis beyond the minimum distance specified above on the reasonable expectation of drainage or water quality impacts. A detailed description of the scope of offsite analysis and submittal requirements is provided in Section 2.3.1.1. Hydrologic analysis methods and requirements for Levels 2 and 3 downstream analysis are contained in Chapter 3; hydraulic analysis methods are contained in Chapter 4. ® DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE PROBLEMS REQUIRING SPECIAL ATTENTION While the area -specific flow control facility requirement in Core Requirement #3 (Section 1.2.3.1) serves to minimize the creation and aggravation of many types of downstream drainage problems, there are some types that are more sensitive to creation/aggravation than others depending on the nature or severity of the problem and which flow control facility standard is being applied. In particular, there are three types of downstream drainage problems for which the County has determined that the nature andlor severity of the problem warrants additional attention through the downstream analysis and possibly additional mitigation to ensure no creation/aggravation: 1. Conveyance system nuisance problem 2. Severe erosion problem 1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manua] 1-24 lmmpw� ��go�c�c�r�o� UFO& �9 CONSULTING ENGINEERS/CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church Sto>rmwater Plan OF Russian Ukranian Par€ usia SDA Church 1860 South 336t Street Federal Way, WA hT@j a, Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventist 32229 Weyerhaeuser Way South Federal Way, WA 98001 R.E.I. JOB NO. 11032 November 21, 2011 I FFV,' 90. I NO 3� 00)Z 1519 West Valley Highway North/Suite 101 o. unlit uun 0oo/HUUurn, VV/H ubu(j 253-833-7776 Fax 253-939-2168 RESUBMIT -FED NOV 0 9 2012 GDS I TABLE OF CONTENTS Proposed Project Description 1 Existing Conditions 1 Infiltration Rates/Soils Report 1 Wells & Septic Systems 1 Fuel Tanks 1 Sub -Basin Description 1 Flood Insurance Rate Map 2 Aesthetic Considerations for Facilities 3 Detention Facility Sizing 3 Covenants, Dedications, Easements 3 Property Owners Association Articles of Incorporation 3 Other Permits or Conditions Placed on the Project 3 LIST ®F APPENDICES A pendix Site Map A KCRTS Detention Calculations B USDA Soil Properties C Stormwater Wetland Plant Options D F Russian Ukranian Parousia SDA Church Proposed Proiect Description The project is to develop a new church facility for praising Jesus Christ on tax parcel 797820-0100 comprising of 1 acre or more. The new building will cover 8,832 square feet, parking and access drives will cover 28,818 square feet, and 17,675 square feet of landscaping. Site runoff will be collected and treated through, a stormwater wetland enhanced basic detention and water quality treatment facility. Existing Conditions The Site is currently a single family home residence which will be demolished. The site has full frontage improvements of curb sidewalk, curbs, gutter, and street lighting. The site also has two existing site driveway curb cuts which will be used as part of the new development. No drainage problems are known to exist in the vicinity of the project site MDA Soils Report The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service soil site classification of the existing site soil is Alderwood gravelly sandy Loam class C till soil. wells & septic Systeafas No wells or septic systems are known to exist in the vicinity. Fuel Tanks No fuel tanks are known to exist in the vicinity. Sub -Basin Description and Detention Pond The new developed site will consist of a new building that will cover 8,832 square feet, parking and access drives will cover 28,818 square feet, and 17,675 feet of landscaping. The site is designed to a flow control level 2 standard. The level 2 standard is to design the release rates to half of the pre -developed 2 year return period and match the 50 year pre -developed rate. Pre -developed condition per City of Federal way is Forest per the following statement: Page 1 From our design manual 's definition section, "Historic conditions " means those that existed on the site prior to any development in the Puget Sound Rion. For lands not currently submerged, this condition is assumed to be forested unless reasonable, historic, site specific 1 information is provided to demonstrate a different vegetation cover. Given that there are roads in your example, I would posit that the grass seen doesn't represent conditions prior to any development in the Puget Sound region and therefore forest' should be used. 1 Note that the 2005 Ecology manual indicates to use forest' as the land cover to be matched for,,flow control unless "reasonable, historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement (modeled as pasture' in the WWHAV. It doesn't allow any other land types for `historic' conditions. Where may be areas in the state that could be deemed historic prairie ' based upon geological evidence, historical accounts, soils, etc. Flow control calculation where done using KCRTS. Detention pond was designed to meet all exceedance requirements. The site design meets Enhanced Basic Water Quality by using the 2009 Surface Water Design Manual Enhanced Basic Option 2 stormwater wetland. Detention is also provided by the stormwater wetland as allowed in the Surface Water Design Manual section 6.4.4. Basin site maps in Appendix B. Flood Insurance Rate Man ` King County Public GIS iMAP — hyrograpic Information did not show the site with in the 100 year flood plan or in a flood way 1 :Ilwww5.kin coon ovliMAPlviewer.htm?ma set=�vria . �1 Page 2 I I I it I I I I J j J -1 i j WKM9Coutty NAP m Hydrographic information Tools ey). [39?0 Survey). �" . • -' / I lil� �� 100 Year Floodpla6n 2 Floodways Channel Migration Into - � i, Ffaxard Arcas Lakes and Large Rivers �7MO i3 King COY Drainage i h Resource �Inventor Inventory Areas f-; MAP Layers. 1 r Streets a © fncarporated Area HOP l LSM new Qkla[iS LEGS ropographk MWatiion Data Mountain Peeks re Shaded haef '+ ~ ' a �.J Cordacars 10llft Contours r 1 r r f Contours(IOOdtdark) IrY Contours [5fi daN _ tA Z. . "! 2007 Color Aerial 1 'r - - _ PhoEo; 2t10$ Color Aerai Phtltas - © 2002 Color Aerial Phptpt There is no Special Flood Hazard Area at the SDA MO olor Aerial church site or in the vicinity. Aesthetic Considerations for Facilities The stormwater wetland and detention facility will be aesthetically planted per City of Federal Way code and the 2009 Surface Water Design Manual Table 6.4. LA Emergent Wetland Plant Species Recommended for Wetponds. See Appendix D for stormwater wetland pond planting options. Detention Facg Sizin Detention system has been sized using KCRTS. Detention pond was sized as a Trapezoidal pond model is 155 feet long, 8 feet wide, 2 foot deep, and with 3:1 side slopes. Page 3 Covenants, Dedications, Easements N/A. Propedy Owners Association Articles of Incorporation N/A Other Permits or Conditions Placed on the Proiect N/A Page 4 APPENDIX A SITE MAP " I a31��saa � w+�ewh y lol .l!.Vwx /x•bm�*jW� -tlM AtlN. ltli130� �tlNN10l1M1.5 ONtl ll/�IO/SX33NION3 ONLLlr15N00 HONHO VISAOddd _ - El - IOU0 'Dweodg6dg p@dnN NVINNNA NdISSAN dvN 3Sb'8 3 2 rn l��y��$p [ �Y R • • • j�( F 3�8dan qR=`=�� 6 o•Sy- ' � gg�Y{ deg-� � ��: �d•�. r. �x oil xQa ag $■ $g>7 �y 9 nYy� @; �r8a ja a a ^ elfi gm $� �� g"A fir 115,110111 1,42 filY a R' gig` - d�a El -r �FRa . S 3u �3 4e ion I � •.I'.r �� gfi Ilk i 8 !1 R I1I+ 'b �L }7 a ygy a 4ay^ r Ln r i �•�w - - e-•i-- - +'?�_---tea - _': ? I� -PRO � cm 19 -77 UG I I i I ce t' ug c� 50 Miof--- ------------M-------- —r-- i _ _ i • p s _ AtlM 1tli1343� OS31 �n b ¢� a $ RnI �UGP tY_'u" TByyP{"Y��S �yy — _ x � • I c r.y Byy `,$Jq wqr- 1K9 m uwug-�rol C4 m ioi . •s WNW VM AMIV6303J lYtlllL�IlillS ONV INIJ/Stl33Nl•JN3 —LLlf —5 HodnHo vlsnodvd °*uU aflupdoouoBug Bxed[mH NVIONAn NVIssnd rn C 6qy W J ZF 3 .� e % b3 N -CC Ll 33 .esaaseeee �sescre• Nvld 39VNlvd4 ONV NUB e K A y i fop CD IN TINIR Z $ + YE@ i1Y Wtl 51 g� € gg ¢€€ 3 b F� � E°c Asa$ c `��i�u��i�IAMI.7��! Hill �Y P p ;III gig, m W d z t 3 QJ K J W � WO LL D) VI li Q O U r� U f osl -Rs i� s�� ao IppB6 n wor tlM AVM 1tl83173i IOI M6 YWX �Nbry�y.�6151 ltltlN.�l1211R ONtl lNl°/RL133NI°N3 7NLLlf15N°� HOMHO V1SnO8dd ,*up 6NAOSUPOUN gsdnN NVIN1van NdISSnd STV130 ONd SNO1103S U g 'I 5 I $r a 0 }0 U AtlM 1Vy303! ` tl/A ik.4114i �! Ww. au iR Hmw VISAOdVd SlIV134 MONVIS *up lftuzoogg a yeduiU NV.INIVNNn N'VISSna �m OV f 3l I � r 1 I g :$ INS z 92ez3 a — t "p'tigy tlM WI �b'C MI �Fvl Wq Ill pp AVM lVE3033 30NVISIO 311S ,tlaN��NH,= ONV lNl�/5 33NI�N3 7N ;NSN�� HONf1HO VISnONdd NOIlO3SON °9�0 66�9dooe�B6�� adodn� NVINIVNNA Nviss 1N� 133N1S 41922 Hinos -..'- I emy14RI v' kuml� a W1 •M *� �+ AVIA IVN3032 lVtlflL�lttl1,5 ONV IIAI�/Stl33NI�N3 7NLLll15N0� HONAHO VISnMdrd i33rodd OM _ °@U0 TUPASSf OU3 pedn� NVINIMAn N1111'ISSfI� Ndld 83M3S ems ano.e • .w si"A'' w � yw� j �� R � e \ � � + Z �1f�SR �� 'l3�liA iaIWO- aft ae.aaASk4j M Pff N r0 W • 'F- i t _ .y k (m O ` >s pe P a oil g a � will Hill pe Z 19 nm gp� lif, ` N 2 ffi I ro--' UFA II • I g [� WA e I I Li- n J'. f ® t' • r.i r II a i c o I I 1 ILUXL YA'wq�l vAn nnn% 111103d ILI •I�aVWX L�•N.N b�A W.16i51 HOdnHo dlsnoded iONHd Onl . = ; ,varu�nxus arrn ,v.u/sanrtnn3 orXu,ns„o� o �q ° rlflpdo�dg6�� doc�7n�y NVINNNA NdISSnd NY1d d31VM 3uu em auu inn _ CD R U eg^]~ - ... - r @es'h®R1§9A z �y Ra..' U• _ r N }y ypA L g ra s t•�.{ C7 Ej ■r` a� b Z 9 � 3� �5a a tJ: a= gppnn■� 0 O ¢3 O N d G K a o W Ex. _QY H- ZO & wl.�iRyB dam ,� 3g�e ¢ ae $.pyp-fig( o a z pp�E o >gg`aa>§`a „ --' S z �a=�� ¢ �`' 8 s e s> asp tw 8 �^ �•.eceo� ' o�� w > �331 v=i5�� ¢ so e� ae- aaag S I gig HI K¢ zE e_ Z g k g a Ell $"I APPENDIX B KCR.TS DETENTION CALCULATIONS 6.1.2 ENHANCED BASIC WATER QUALITY MENU 6.1.2 ENHANCED BASIC WATER QUALITY MENU Where applied: The Enhanced Basic Water Quality menu3 is applied where an enhanced level of treatment is required for those development sites or portions thereof that generate the highest concentrations of metals in stormwater runoff and drain by surface flows to a fish -bearing stream. Acute concentrations of metals such as copper and zinc in streams are toxic to fish. For precise details on the application of this and other water quality menus, refer to Section 1.2.8, "Core Requirement #8: Water Quality." Note: The Enhanced Basic menu is a stand-alone menu It integrates the Basic menu level of protection and the additional measures needed to achieve a higher level of metals removal. When this menu is required in Basic WQ Treatment Areas per Section 1.2.8.1 A of Core Requirement #8, it is intended to replace the Basic WQ menu on development sites or portions of development sites that generate the highest concentrations of metals in stormwater runoff. When this menu is required in Sensitive Lake WQ Treatment Areas per Section 1.2.8.1 B, it is intended to be combined with the Sensitive Lake Protection Menu such that a facility design option common to both menus must be used. Treatment goal: The Enhanced Basic WQ menu is designed to achieve 50 percent total zinc removal for flows up to and including the WQ design flow or volume (defined in Section 6.2.1, p. 6-17) a Basis: The treatment goal is expressed in terms oftotal zinc removal. Although zinc is not the most toxic metal in stormwater, it is usually present in significant amounts, making it a practical and reliable indicator of overall performance. Many metals are readily adsorbed onto particulates in the runoff; usually the finer fraction of the particulates. Facility combinations that remove more of the particulate load than the Basic menu, including the finer fraction, are specified by the Enhanced Basic menu. Facilities providing organic binding sites that enhance metal adsorption are also specified. ❑ ENHANCED BASIC OPTION 1— LARGE SAND FILTER This option includes use of a large sand filter, large sand filter vault, or large linear sand filter. Sizing specifications for these facilities can be found in Sections 6.5.2 (p. 6-104), 6.5.3 (p. 6-123), and 6.5.4 (p. 6-129), respectively. Note: A presettling cell rs required if the s0ndfilter is not preceded by a detention facility. ❑ ENHANCED BASIC OPTION 2—STORMWATER WETLAND Provision of a stormwater wetland (see Section 6.4.3, p. 6-89) or combined detention and stormwater wetland (see Section 6.4.4, P. 6-95) satisfies the 54 percent zinc removal goal without additional facilities. The large amount of organic material in the stormwater wetland provides organic binding sites and is considered very effective in removing metals. ❑ ENHANCED BASIC OPTION 3—TWO-FACILITY TREATMENT TRAIN This option uses one of the basic water quality treatment options listed in Table 6.1.2.A (p. 6-8) followed by a basic sand filter (see Section 6.5.2, p. 6-104), sand filter vault (see Section 6.53, p. 6-123), linear sand filter (see Section 6.5.4, p. 6-129), or StormFilter with CSFrm leaf compost media (see Section 6.5.5, p. 6-134). s The Enhanced Basic WQ menu targets different pollutants than the lake or bog protection menus. It does not necessarily provide a higher level of treatment except for the target pollutant, metal contaminants. This goal assumes total zinc concentrations for untreated runoff are between 0.10 and 0.25 milligrams per alter (m/L). For projects that are expected to generate higher levels of metals, such as a mining operation, a higher treatment goal may be appropriate. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009 6-7 �LYJu �LJLI�LiLILJLgLJLJ LJUll�r� DLILI@O JOB CONSULTING ENGINEERWIVILAND STRUCTURAL SHEET NO. OF 1519 West Valley Highway North/Suite 101/Auburn, WA 98001 CALCULATED gY DATE 253-833-7776 Fax 253-939-2168 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE D PRODUCT207 LCLII: ipL��LcJL1LJ LLJU�9 om@p JOB CONSULTING ENGINEERS QVII_AND STRUCTURAL SHEET NO. OF_ 1519 West Valley Highway North/Suite 101/Auburn, WA 98001 CALCULATED By —,DATE 253-833-7776 Fax 253-939-2168 CHECKED BY FATE SCALE ^ .! y v. r .- m .- n n v a � .. q ry n • n u . n - n n .. D PRODUCT207 M - tlGP L1CA' ° n i 71UGP ' ° •O —�-------- -- - - - - --- j Wow I° Ills' 1 I U 19 I 1 � U � •� I I I � °'� 1 N�tlM3([IS ,S A-1tlM3Q J_ NVA J,�w 1 II Lq U U U U U U U U U U lam,Li I ! ! f 1 I 1 I Iia I ! l f I Ip IIIfl " E 1 I - - - - - 3ai l Al Y3dQNd o { 1 c __ - I I -------------------------------- xl aI I"! LD zl �s IU� I I wl d W I -D cn al I � C - .-V-, . ji- - . ri"461 AML IL DIM& JOB CONSULTING ENGINEERS/CIVILAND STRUCTURAL SHEET NO. OF 1519 West Valley Highway North/Suite 101/Auburn, WA 98001 CALCULATED BY DATE — 253-833-7776 Fax 253-939-2168 CHECKED BY DATE ^� SCALE 1 iJ 4 5 67 6 i 6 7 8 1 3 4 5 4 1 8 2 3 4 5 6 1 6 1 3 4 5 4 1 A ! 3 4 5 6 x r --> 7 e �Of 2 AI? e a f i � ' � ; z y 3 g 6 3 � 7 6 e x e i a x D.. iPRODUCT207 I _ la ft 19 yW `•• ~�O ' q �., 5 m^ ¢W �i3 in inenz O i L .5 7�2,gi� III CL 41 n � •rye-y'}'`-`"�'.'• '�� :IE`" �■^.�r� � +? - a g Uri n 's-'x''',Z,e� 10 M � a f s� .��,{ r �;��` Ij �� 'r � 3�'• I _R.M ksv1 :I. ------------- C��• 1 1'i' �rY"�� r I � .�• 1 lI zl r 4J = I 1 I I 1 I I I ... .� I i � • ° f L------ I 1 I I I I I I tl I i r �• r I I -----_____ L � —�J r y 4 —--------------------- ------ --------------------------_ Y--- PR E --v€v EC apED 1,27 AC L C FO 6 S --------------------- Time Series File:pred� sf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates --- Flaw Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.080 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.022 7 1/06/02 3:00 0.059 4 2/28/03 3:00 0.002 8 3/24/04 21:00 0.035 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.062 3 1/18/06 21:00 0.052 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.102 1 1/09/08 9:00 'omputed Peaks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.102 1 100.00 0.990 0.080 2 25.00 0.960 0.062 3 10.00 0.900 0.059 4 5.00 0.800 0.052 5 3.00 0.667 0.035 6 2.00 0.500 0.022 7 1.30 0.231 0.002 8 1.10 0.091 0.095 50.00 0.980 felfT&Q_VAL_ E 50M —sO'er"-2�� CvraFF_� 0. 09,5 - (0j)(0, 05S) I ' 04, 0.10S /:71fts'r vA(, _Ct9d k-, (0.5K,04 — 'PEVE LaPE-0 C6)JUtO I -?,-1- 0>vS Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.245 6 2/09/01 2:0.0 0.493 1 100.00 0.990 0.202 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.323 2 25.00 0.960 0.294 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.294 3 10.00 0.900 0.222 7 8/26/04 2:0.0 0.266 4 5.00 0.800 0.266 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.260 5 3.00 0.667 0.260 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.245 6 2.00 0.500 0.323 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.222 7 1.30 0.231 0.493 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.202 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.436 50.00 0.980 0 ,1 ,-( AC 7`l t c 0,8( AC_ /A111-2V t14wq /Z 00 F �- P/Z /Z G 47 I j j Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Pond Side Slope: 3.00 H:1V Pond Bottom Length: 210.00 ft Pond Bottom Width: 19.76 ft Pond Bottom Area: 4150. sq. ft Top Area at 1 ft. FB: 9416. sq. ft 0.216 acres Effective Storage Depth: 2.50 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 380.50 ft Storage Volume: 14871. cu. ft 0.341 ac-ft Riser Head: 2.50 ft Riser Diameter: 8.00 inches Number of orifices: 2 .!;- 70 X e- e 1L9Q v I rt,EV /Y 971 GF CAnto vol- = 1Y ooa cF Z�(Iv f prpE = 880 c F TOTAL ST02A6,6 = /y BYQ GIB ¢�/LOv�nEf� Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 0.74 0.023 2 1.70 1.36 0.045 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation Surf Area (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) (sq. ft) 0.00 380.50 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 4150. 0.01 380.51 42. 0.001 0.001 0.00 4164. 0.02 380.52 83. 0.002 0.002 0.00 4178. 0.03 380.53 125. 0.003 0.003 0.00 4192. 0.04 380.54 167. 0.004 0.003 0.00 4205. 0.05 380.55 209. 0.005 0.003 0.00 4219. 0.06 380.56 252. 0.006 0.004 0.00 4233. 0.16 380.66 682. 0.016 0.006 0.00 4372. 0.26 380.76 1126. 0.026 0.008 0.00 4511. 0.36 380.86 1584. 0.036 0.009 0.00 4651. 0.46 380.96 2056. 0.047 0.010 0.00 4792. 0.56 381.06 2542. 0.058 0.011 0.00 4933. 0.66 381.16 3043. 0.070 0.012 0.00 5076. 0.76 381.26 3558. 0.082 0.013 0.00 5219. 0.86 381.36 4087. 0.094 0.014 0.00 5362. 0.96 381.46 4630. 0.106 0.015 0.00 5507. 1.06 381.56 5188. 0.119 0.015 0.00 5652. 1.16 381.66 5761. 0.132 0.016 0.00 5798. 1.26 381.76 6348. 0.146 0.017 0.00 5944. 1.36 381.86 6949. 0.160 0.017 0.00 6092. 1.46 381.96 7566. 0.174 0.018 0.00 6240. 1.56 382.06 8197. 0.188 0.019 0.00 6388. 1.66 382.16 8844. 0.203 0.019 0.00 6538. 1.70 382.20 9106. 0.209 0.019 0.00 6598. 1.71 382.21 9172. 0.211 0.020 0.00 6613. 1.73 382.23 9305. 0.214 0.021 0.00 6643. 1.74 382.24 9371. 0.215 0.023 0.00 6658. 1.76 382.26 9505. 0.218 0.026 0.00 6688. 1.77 382.27 9572. 0.220 0.029 0.00 6703. 1.79 382.29 9706. 0.223 0.033 0.00 6733. 1.80 382.30 9774. 0.224 0.036 0.00 6748. 1.81 382.31 9841. 0.226 0.037 0.00 6763. 1.91 382.41 10525. 0.242 0.044 0.00 6915. 2.01 38.2.51 11224. 0.258 0.049 0.00 7067. 2.11 382.61 11938. 0.274 0.054 0.00 7219. 2.21 382.71 12668. 0.291 0.058 0.00 7373. 2.31 382.81 13413. 0.308 0.062 0.00 7527. R EA 2.41 382.91 14173. 0.325 0.065 0.00 7682. 2.50 >T02A GG 383.00 14� 0.341 0.068 0.00 7822. 2.60 383.10 15661. 0.360 0.277 0.00 7978. 2.70 383.20 16467. 0.378 0.655 0.00 8135. 2.80 383.30 17288. 0.397 0.998 0.00 8292. 2.90 383.40 18125. 0.416 1.140 0.00 8451. 3.00 ' 383.50 18978. 0.436 1.270 0.00 8610. 3.10 383.60 19847. 0.456 1.390 0.00 8770. 3.20 383.70 20732. 0.476 1.490 0.00 8930. 3.30 383.80 21633. 0.497 1.590 0.00 9092. 3.40 383.90 22550. 0.518 1.690 0.00 9254. 3.50 384.00 23484. 0.539 1.780 0.00 9416. 3.60 384.10 24434. 0.561 1.860 0.00 9580. 3.70 384.20 25400. 0.583 1.940 0.00 9744. 3.80 384.30 26382. 0.606 2.020 0.00 9909. 3.90 -1 384.40 27382. 0.629 2.090 0.00 10074. 4.00 384.50 28397. 0.652 2.160 0.00 10240. 11 4.10 384.60 29430. 0.676 2.230 0.00 10408. 4.20 384.70 30479. 0.700 2.300 0.00 10575. 4.30 384.80 31545. 0.724 2.370 0.00 10744. 4.40 384.90 32628. 0.749 2.430 0.00 10913. 4.50 385.00 33727. 0.774 2.490 0.00 11083. Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Calc Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 1 0.49 ******* 0.29 2.60 383.10 15682. 0.360 2 0.25 0.08 0.07 2.50 383.00 14896. 0.342 3 0.25 ******* 0.06 2.27 382.77 13133. 0.302 4 0.29 ******* 0.06 2.19 382.69 12535. 0.288 5 0,26 ******* 0.05 1.97 382.47 10939. 0.251 6 0.15 ******* 0.02 1.72 382.22 9261. 0.213 7 0,20 ******* 0.02 1.50 382.00 7789. 0.179 8 0.22 ******* 0.02 1.20 381.70 6009. 0.138 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf Outflow Time JInflow/Outflow Series File:rdout Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.493 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.287 CFS at 10:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Peak Reservoir Stage: 2.60 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 383.10 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 15682. Cu-Ft 0.360 Ac-Ft J I I I j I j j j Flow Duration from Time Series File:rdout.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence Probability CFS % ° o ° 0 - 0.001 33988 55.427 55.427 44.573 0.446E+00 0.004 4815 7.852 63.280 36.720 0.367E+00 0.006 5620 9.165 72.445 27.555 0.276E+00 0.008 4481 7.308 79.752 20.248 0.202E+00 0.011 5173 8.436 88.188 11.812 0.118E+00 0.013 2711 4.421 92.609 7.391 0.739E-01 0.015 2017 3.289 95.899 4.101 0.410E-01 0.018 1350 2.202 98.100 1.900 0.190E-01 0.020 821 1.339 99.439 0.561 0.561E-02 0.022 55 0.090 99.529 0.471 0.471E-02 0.025 21 0.034 99.563 0.437 0.437E-02 0.027 19 0.031 99.594 0.406 0.406E-02 0.029 11 0.018 99.612 0.388 0.388E-02 0.032 10 0.016 99.628 0.372 0.372E-02 0.034 9 0.015 99.643 0.357 0.357E-02 0.036 9 0.015 99.658 0.342 0.342E-02 0.039 33 0.054 99.711 0.289 0.289E-02 0.041 15 0.024 99.736 0.264 0.264E-02 0.043 20 0.033 99.768 0.232 0.232E-02 0.046 27 0.044 99.812 0.188 0.188E-02 0.048 21 0.034 99.847 0.153 0.153E-02 0.051 14 0.023 99.870 0.130 0.130E-02 0.053 10 0.016 99.886 0.114 0.114E-02 0.055 11 0.018 99.904 0.096 0.962E-03 0.058 16 0.026 99.930 0.070 0.701E-03 0.060 14 0.023 99.953 0.047 0.473E-03 0.062 12 0.020 99.972 0.028 0.277E-03 0.065 6 0.010 99.982 0.018 0.179E-03 0.067 6 0.010 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04 0.069 3 0.005 99.997 0.003 0.326E-04 0.072 0 0.000 99.997 0.003 0.326E-04 0.074 1 0.002 99.998 0.002 0.163E-04 0.076 0 0.000 99.998 0.002 0.163E-04 0.079 0 0.000 99.998 0.002 0.163E-04 0.081 0 0.000 99.998 0.002 0.163E-04 0.083 0 0.000 99.998 0.002 0.163E-04 v Ob'0 N O r r a c 80'0 90'0 V0'0 ZO'0 00'0 O (s=jo) aBieyasla j Duration Comparison Anaylsis j----------------------------- Base File: predev.tsf New File: rdout.tsf Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Time ----- ---------Check of Tolerance------- CutoffBase New n.hange Probability Base New %Change 0.020 0.75E-02 0.57E-02 -23.8 0.75E-02 0.020 0.019 -4.5r" 0.025 0.56E-02 0.44E-02 -21.4 0.56E-02 0.025 0.020 -18.4 0.029 0.43E-02 0.39E-02 -9.1 0.43E-02 0.029 0.025 -13.9 0.034 0.33E-02 0.36E-02 7.4 0.33E-02 0.034 0.037 9.7 0.038 0.27E-02 0.30E-02 12.2 0.27E-02 0.038 0.041 6.4 0.043 0.20E-02 0.24E-02 19.7 0.20E-02 0.043 0.045 5.0 0.048 0.14E-02 0.15E-02 11.8 0.14E-02 0.048 0.050 4.8 0.052 0.86E-03 0.12E-02 35.3 0.86E-03 0.052 0.056 7.5 0.057 0.54E-03 0.82E-03 51.5 0.54E-03 0.057 0.059 3.9 0.061 0.31E-03 0.31E-03 0.0 0.31E-03 0.061 0.061 0.0 0.066 0.21E-03 0.13E-03 -38.5 0.21E-03 0.066 0.064 -3.1 0.071 0.16E-03 0.33E-04 -80.0 0.16E-03 0.071 0.065 -7.9 0.075 0.98E-04 0.16E-04 -83.3 0.98E-04 0.075 0.067 -11.3 0.080 0.16E-04 0.16E-04 0.0 0.16E-04 0.080 0.084 5.4 simum positive excursion = 0.003 cfs ( 10.2i) „ /0 a� ccurring at 0.034 cfs on the Base Data:predev.tsf nd at 0.037 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf aimum negative excursion = 0.006 cfs (-22.4%) curring at 0.027 cfs on the Base Data:predev.tsf d at 0.021 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf A �L GE Sl 7'ElEtii I o °% o tz- 7 L E sT 7`1.eFv 0"' ok. j I APPENDIX C USDA SOIL PROPERTIES I j I J I j j Physical Soil Properties —King County Area, Washington SDA Church Physical Soil Properties This table shows estimates of some physical characteristics and features that affect soil behavior. These estimates are given for the layers of each soil in the survey area. The estimates are based on field observations and on test data for these and similar soils. Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. Particle size is the effective diameter of a soil particle as measured by sedimentation, sieving, or micrometric methods_ Particle sizes are expressed as classes with specific effective diameter class limits. The broad classes are sand, silt, and clay, ranging from the larger to the smaller. Sand as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are 0.05 millimeter to 2 millimeters in diameter. In this table, the estimated sand content of each soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Silt as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are 0.002 to 0.05 millimeter in diameter. In this table, the estimated silt content of each soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Clay as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are less than 0.002 millimeter in diameter. In this table, the estimated clay content of each soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. i The content of sand, silt, and clay affects the physical behavior of a soil. Particle size is important for engineering and agronomic interpretations, for determination of soil hydrologic qualities, and for soil classification. The amount and kind of clay affect the fertility and physical condition of the soil and the ability of the soil to adsorb cations and to retain moisture. They influence shrink - swell potential, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), plasticity, the ease of soil dispersion, and other soil properties. The amount and kind of clay in a soil also affect tillage and earthmoving operations. Moist bulk density is the weight of soil (ovendry) per unit volume. Volume is measured when the soil is at field moisture capacity, that is, the moisture content at 1/3- or 1/10-bar (33kPa or 10kPa) moisture tension. Weight is determined after the soil is dried at 105 degrees C. In the table, the estimated moist bulk density of each soil horizon is expressed in grams per cubic centimeter of soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Bulk density data are used to compute linear extensibility, shrink -swell potential, available water capacity, total pore space, and other soil properties. The moist bulk density of a soil indicates the pore space availablefor waterand roots. Depending on soil texture, a bulk density of more than 1.4 can restrict water storage and root penetration. Moist bulk density is influenced by texture, kind of clay, content of organic matter, and soil structure. Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) refers to the ease with which pores in a saturated soil transmit water. The estimates in the table are expressed in terms of micrometers per second. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) is considered in the design of soil drainage systems and septic tank absorption fields. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey id� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/18/2011 Page 1 of 5 Physical Soil Properties —King County Area, Washington SDA Church Available water capacity refers to the quantity of water that the soil is capable of storing for use by plants. The capacity for water storage is given in inches of water per inch of soil for each soil layer. The capacity varies, depending on soil properties that affect retention of water. The most important properties are the content of organic matter, soil texture, bulk density, and soil structure. Available water capacity is an important factor in the choice of plants or crops to be grown and in the design and management of irrigation systems. Available water capacity is not an estimate of the quantity of water actually available to plants at any given time. Linear extensibility refers to the change in length of an unconfined clod as moisture content is decreased from a moist to a dry state. It is an expression of the volume change between the water content of the clod at 1/3- or 1/1 0-bar tension (33kPa or 10kPa tension) and oven dryness. The volume change is reported in the table as percent change for the whole soil. The amount and type of clay minerals in the soil influence volume change. Linear extensibility is used to determine the shrink -swell potential of soils. The shrink -swell potential is low if the soil has a linear extensibility of less than 3 percent; moderate if 3 to 6 percent; high if 6 to 9 percent; and very high if more than 9 percent. If the linear extensibility is more than 3, shrinking and swelling can cause damage to buildings, roads, and other structures and to plant roots. Special design commonly is needed. Organic matter is the plant and animal residue in the soil at various stages of decomposition. In this table, the estimated content of organic matter is expressed as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The content of organic matter in a soil can be maintained by returning crop residue to the soil. Organic matter has a positive effect on available water capacity, water infiltration, soil organism activity, and tilth. It is a source of nitrogen and other nutrients for crops and soil organisms. Erosion factors are shown in the table as the K factor (Kw and Kf) and the T factor. Erosion factor K indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet and rill erosion by water. Factor K is one of six factors used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) to predict the average annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The estimates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter and on soil structure and Ksat. Values of K range from 0.02 to 0.69.Other factors being equal, the higher the value, the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water. Erosion factor Kw indicates the erodibility of the whole soil. The estimates are modified by the presence of rock fragments. Erosion factor Kf indicates the erodibility of the fine -earth fraction, or the material less than 2 millimeters in size. Erosion factor is an estimate of the maximum average annual rate of soil erosion by wind and/or water that can occur without affecting crop productivity over a sustained period. The rate is in tons per acre per year. Wind erodibility groups are made up of soils that have similar properties affecting their susceptibility to wind erosion in cultivated areas. The soils assigned to group 1 are the most susceptible to wind erosion, and those assigned to group 8 are the least susceptible. The groups are described in the "National Soil Survey Handbook." LiSDA Natural Resources ;4" Conservation Serrice Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/18/2011 Page 2 of 5 Physical Soil Properties —King County Area, Washington SDA Church Wind erodibility index is a numerical value indicating the susceptibility of soil to wind erosion, or the tons per acre per yearthat can be expected to be lost to wind erosion. There is a close correlation between wind erosion and the texture of the surface �j layer, the size and durability of surface clods, rock fragments, organic matter, and a calcareous reaction. Soil moisture and frozen soil layers also influence wind erosion. Reference: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. (http://soils.usda.gov) I I j 21111111111 natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1812011 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 J k ca m as O c m to 0 a c_ � c �0co m v F C [h O O w O` u Y N co M Ci W w 0 a o Y = m 0 m o o u� E a o C? 0 o o ri o I I I I I W �aC U JC a Q) 07 0) N N N ° o 0 o IT I I I a m _ 1 3200 _ Z o 9 C = 4 4 a c o 0 o I I I I I 6 0 C3 > vi \ CD 0 0 0 � a ° N N f o d a C yL � U _ E CD o O 0 i 0 � o - N N O a+ ` � W Y .- U ai !� 0 7 C U 0 N Q. U) ' rn rn CD a o o I I I I I L. a o00 •o a CC) coco U) L6 6'L v in U N N N I I I I IL C I wCD a ° M 19I I I I I C r a = CD~ o `r' N I I I I I m CD Ec o mv E TQa N a) M l0 O.O I CDC0 n 0, € U W'om— C6 O G -O Q 01 UJ ... to co O Q Q - m m Z E-- co -U') T N z U) Q n a o �0 m 0 m Z L U 7 L U ¢ U) ca m o O c d m m �= a _:2o -O R. V m v = N P7 _O N Yco O u W N M Yu� o 0 o �m o CD CDCC7 0 to a M C7 O O O O M O I I I I I CDm 'y _= U a J 01 CA CA aN+ x N N CV °' CD CD CD o� OI I I I 1 1 m � N r '03C C5 o u oo C3 C6 CD CD CD o 0 0 l l l l l m" � 3 +r 21h o o 0 0 N 04 tt � I V% Z O ,U CD O CD O ca o l l l l l y Y C J O C"!N O O O N 'O 3 = � � r• CV a m V CD m o O o C> U O O O a CO I I I I I a N N N I I I I I = O a C C6 rm O cli hCD CCO C Il Il m O cD: C:v � m E= a E N o�,ocol m> c a rn a'n a)CD m d _m � ¢ 01 faw a)Z ¢ I C O _i t rn y O N o N C N O N N L Q M AW Q U) E c co L 0 O 0 U U) Y ` id CU 3 Q ❑ C ca Q U) U) to 0 0 N Lf) 2 Cu �n m a Z CO O U7 O N U) .�— m o C Co Q U m O f0 z Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings —King County Area, Washington SDA Church Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings Sail properties influence the development of building sites, including the selection of the site, the design of the structure, construction, performance after construction, and maintenance. This table shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect dwellings and small commercial buildings. The ratings in the table are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect building site development. Not limited indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can 1 be expected. Somewhat limited indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected_ Very limited indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or ^� expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected. Numerical ratings in the table indicate the severity of individual limitations. The I ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use (1.00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00y Dwellings are single-family houses of three stories or less. For dwellings without basements, the foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or at the depth of maximum frost penetration, whichever is deeper. For dwellings with basements, the foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of about 7 feet. The ratings for dwellings are based on the soil properties that affect the capacity of the soil to support a load without movement and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs. The properties that affect the load -supporting capacity include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink-swe(l potential), and compressibility. Compressibility is inferred from the Unified classification. The properties that affect the ease and amount of excavation include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, slope, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, and the amount and size of rock fragments. Small commercial buildings are structures that are less than three stories high and do not have basements. The foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or at the depth of maximum frost penetration, whichever is deeper. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect the capacity of the soil to supporta load without movement and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs. The properties that affect the load -supporting capacity include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink -swell potential), and compressibility (which is inferred from the Unified classification), The properties that affect the ease and amount of excavation include flooding, depth to a water table, ponding, slope, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, and the amount and size of rock fragments. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/18/201 1 Conservation Se7 ice National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings —King County Area, Washington SDA Church Information in this table is intended for land use planning, for evaluating land use alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction. The information, however, has limitations. For example, estimates and other data generally apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to 7 feet. Because of the map scale, small areas of different soils may be included within the mapped areas of a specific soil. The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation of the soils or for testing and analysis by personnel experienced in the design and construction of engineering works. Government ordinances and regulations that resbict certain land uses or impose specific design criteria were not considered in preparing the information in this table. Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site selection, and in design. Report —Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings [Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional limitations] Map symbol and soil name AgB—Alderwood ~ gravelly sandy loam, 0 nt to 6 perceslopes AJderwood Bucldey Bellingham Norma Tukwila Shalcar Natural Resources Conservation Ser 're Dwellings and SmaU Commercial Buildings— King County Area, Washington Pct. of Dwellings withoutjq Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings map �� unit class anRating class and Value Rating class and Value lirruting featurelimiting features limiting features 75 1 Somewhat limited Depth to saturated zone 10 Not rated 4 Not rated 4 Not rated 4 Not rated 3 Not rated Very limited 0.20 Depth to saturated zone Not rated Not rated Not rated Not rated Not rated Web Soil Survey National Cooperative F-9 Survey Somewhat limited 1.00 Depth to saturated zone Not rated Not rated Not rated Not rated Not rated 0.20 5/18/2011 Page 2 of 3 Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings -King County Area, Washington SDA Church Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings- King County Area, Washington Map symbol and soil Pct. of Dwellings without basements Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings name map Rating class and unit Ratin�features Value Rating class and Value limitilimiting features limiting features AgC Alderwood j gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Alderwood 95 Somewhat limited Very limited Very limited Slope 0.37 Depth to saturated 1.00 Slope 1.00 zone Depth to saturated 0.20 Slope 0.37 Depth to saturated 0.20 zone zone j Bellingham 1 Not rated Niratel Not rated _ Norma 1 Not rated NNot rated Seattle 1 Not rated N Not rated Shalcar 1 Not rated NNot ratedTukwila 1 Not rated N1Not rated Data Source Information 1 Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington 1 Survey Area Data: Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 i i USDA Natural Resources Web Sail Survey 5/18/2011 Conservati-oin Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 APPENDIX D STORNIWATER WETLAND PLANT OPTIONS I I 1 I 11 j j 6.4.1 WETPONDS —BASIC AND LARGE —DESIGN CRITERIA -1 TABLE 6.4.1.A EMERGENT WETLAND PLANT SPECIES RECOMMENDED FOR WETPONDS Species Common Name Notes Maximum Depth INUNDATION TO 1 FOOT Agrostis exarata(') Spike bent grass Prairie to coast to 2 feet Carex stipata Sawbeak sedge Wet ground Eleocharis palustris Spike rush Margins of ponds, wet meadows to 2 feet Glyceria occidentalis Western mannagrass Marshes, pond margins to 2 feet Juncus effusus Soft rush Wet meadows, pastures, wetland to 2 feet margins Juncus tenuis Slender rush Wet soils, wetland margins Oenanthe sarmentosa Water parsley Shallow water along stream and pond margins; needs saturated soils all summer Scirpus atrocinctus Woolgrass Tolerates shallow water; tall clumps (formerly S. cyperinus) Scirpus microcarpus Small -fruited bulrush Wet ground to 18 inches depth 18 inches Sagittaria latifolia Arrowhead INUNDATION 1 TO 2 FEET Agrostis exarata(i) Spike bent,grass Prairie to coast Alisma plantago-aquatica ri Water plantain Eleocharis palustris Spike rush Margins of ponds, wet meadows Glyceria occidentalis Western mannagrass Marshes, pond margins Juncus effusus Soft rush Wet meadows, pastures, wetland margins Scirpus microcarpus Small -fruited bulrush Wet ground to 18 inches depthUs6ils Sparganium emmersum Bur reed Shallow standing water, saturated INUNDATION 1 TO 3 FEET Carex obnupta Wet ground or standing water 1.5 to 3 feet Beckmania syzigachne(l) ss Wet prairie to pond margins Scirpus acutus(2) f� Single tall stems, not clumping to 3 feet ow Scirpus validus(2) :i INUNDATION GREATER THAN 3 FEET Nuphar polysepalum Spatterdock [ Deep water 3 to 7.5 feet Nymphaea odorata(') —] White waterlily . "" Shallow to deep ponds to 6 feet Note)- (') Non-native species. Beckmania syzigachne is native to Oregon. Native species are preferred. (2) Scirpus tubers must be planted shallower for establishment, and protected from foraging waterfowl until established. Emerging aerial stems should project above water surface to allow oxygen transport to the roots. Primary sources: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, Water Pollution Control Aspects of Aquatic Plants, 1990. Hortus Northwest, Wetland Plants for Western Oregon, Issue 2, 1991. Hitchcock and Cronquist, Flora of the Pacific Northwest, 1973. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009 6-77 U//13/GUl1 viants Search "r ms'P�'lrtAt_�_� a Coils ii �lC?'O,l ��vuoa!-nasi Adopt A -Road Be Green Illegal Dumping Hotline Low Impact Development (LID) for Roads About LID Bioretention facility/rain garden Plants Porous concrete Projects lide shows 1 Projectteam I Waterqualityand monitoring data J Low Impact Devoiopma for Roaft Militat y Road S. at I-,. 27Znd Str t. King County Road Services - Low Impact Development (LID) for Roads - Military Road S. at S. 272nd St. Project - Bioretention facility/rain garden plants What plants will be planted in the bioretention facility/rain garden? The bioretention facility/rain garden will be planted this fall with four native species common to Pacific Northwest wetlands: slough sedge, sawbeak sedge, daggerleaf rush, and small -fruited bulrush. Plants were chosen using guidance from the King County Surface Water Design Manual, the Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound, the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, and consultation with internal King County staff. As opposed to the summer months, new plantings are more likely to establish and survive during the relatively cooler, wetter weather common to Northwest autumns. Autumn also coincides with the cycle nurseries typically follow for this type of vegetation, ensuring availability of the species of choice. Hegronai rcoaa MaintenanceESAProgram Slough Sedge Saw beak Sedge /�3\ Dagge4af,Rush � Guidelines - Regional Carex obnupta Carex stipata Juncus�n'iTollus Guidelines / 1 Stormwater monitoring and Additional native plants for landscaping treatment Stream and wetiand t' Reconstruction of the northeast corner of the mitigation ' �� r intersection includes new landscape } ,r vegetation, which will also be planted this fall. The site is to be planted with kinnikinnik, also known as bearberry, a native evergreen shrub effective in combating erosion. Rcar.c, Sou�i i Parl; ^; idc �i'2iC'o!C Pict! or Road' e \SCe Knnikinni Arctastapg uva-ursi '!ericcar etas % -rra n s it c. ria iiD ri Pianilinc ! r�:,c ui. a-; coriacl Lis on!raci c iv ssi :;ces r Small -fruited Bulrush Scirpus microcarpus I Related documents • Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound, Appendix3, Bioretention Plant List (112KB .pdf) • Bioretention facility plants and descriptions (28KB .)ds) • King County Surface Water DesPan Manual, Appendix C. Water Tolerant Plants (85KB .jpg) • Washington State Department of Ecology Recommended Plants for Wet Biofrltration Swale (127KB •jpg) ms A kingcounty.gov/ .. /Plants.aspx 1/2 V//1J/LV11 wnite water -Lily Nnotos, Wlllte Water-Lll... Citizens of Ballard! Call nog.: D, get a Beautiful Family, child and senior free raingardcn for Spring portraits - studio and location } White Water -Lily WildliFe Photo Gallery v+r:.v. 5 r.i d i a 84 a rt r. i e .Von Search Homel2age > Plants > White Water -Lily > Photo no. 8602 White Water -Lily « rprev-iouS ne_a » Birds NAMBFUTO Photobank Mammals Reptiles ]in Bohdal Amphibians Fishes � )an Sevcik Insect Lubos P9ra7 Inver•.ebrates Miflos Andcra P.enIts ]aroslav 14a1y iushrooms i' _ .� I+ Pavel I: rasensky Landscapes s Ivan Bile!: Various subjects Alex Auer New photos Tomas Kotouc j e-Cards Petr Soural T Walipapers I Photo no. 8502 (Category a) E-mail i S _: nab this nhoto li -calvJ AdChaims ij IIu�/PuhElsh this I��tr� info@naturfoto.cz -F' White Water -Lily Pond Plants/ (Nyn-phaea alba) Frequently asked Water Lilies Family::: _:___,_;,, faryfy Water Plants / Aquatic Cesky Krurrdov, CZ_ 11.07.2008 questions Plants All Water Garden Plants Other languages: 1 Guaranteed 1} ry haea Alba L CZ: Leknin bit' OE: WelBe 5eerose DK: Hvid Nokkerose EE. e Val TexasWakerLllr�.mm Ymp y g veslroos ES; Nen6far blanco FR: Nenuphar blanc FT. isolumme IT: Nlnfea comune HU. Outdoor sprikler Fehertavirozsa NL: Witte waterlelie NO: Stor nykkerose PL: Glzybienie biale 5E: Vit system nackros SK: Lekno bie$e UK: White Water -Lily Outdoor Garden sprinkler system save 10% first time Another photos: customers White Water -Lily White Water -Lily White Water-Lili , Pond Fountains & Aerators Beautify & Aerate Your Pond Or Lake Made In J USA 5-Year Warranty • vwwa. ScottAe ra to r. m m (pine Sprinklers — - - Professional Sprinkler — — (Nymphaea alba) —T. j (Nymphaea alba) (Nymphaea alba)-- —, Installation Trouble Photo no. 15023 Photo no. 15022 Photo no. 14119 free and low maintenance White Water -Lily White Water -Lily Photo no. 11982 Koenders Windmills Voted #1 Windmill Aeration System in the j World by Pond , Owners. r•:d. I wmW.koenders%Hndmills_m... I (Nymphaea alba) (Nymphaea alba) (Enlarge Photography) _ ` Photo no. 12088 i IL — Photo no. 12087 Photo no. 1243 Photo no. 1242 Photo no. 1241 r j naturephoto-cz.com/white-water-lily:ny... I 1/2 .JVGUUciuvLR, bpCILLC1UVlK: web space I free website I Web Hosting I Free Website Submission I shopping cart I php hosting Get a —1 rF-j F--' Website Search [Note: Ads automatically inserted by ZeroCatch (home of the "Free 100MB Website") and do not necessarily reflect my views. ] Yep, Russett developers misspelled it -- it's... SPATTERDOCK Top 5 Fascinating F acts(R)TmAbout atter&ck ! 5. Spatterdock is a Lily that lives in Water ... but is not a Water Lily! 4. Spatterdock is sometanes considered a Weed, and some commercial Herbicides have been developed to kill it! 3. Spatterdock is avoided by Manatees because it contains Natural Toxins! 2. Spatterdock is worth 20 Points towards a Grand Mastership in JAquatic Horticulture from the Mi =sota Ag pajurn Socieiv ... ifyou can grow it in your Basement! ] 1. Spatterdock is NOT effectively controlled using Cam! + kwiniec.Ocatch.com/spatterdock.html .J 1/2 I I I j USDA Nr � ��cC Plant Fact Sheet'. WESTERN N ANNAGRASS Glyceria occidentalis (Piper) J.C. Nels. Plant Symbol = GLOC Contributed by: USDA MRCS Plant Materials Center, Corvallis, Oregon Dale Dams USDA NRCS Corvallis PMC Alternate Names Other names are Northwestern mannagrass, tall waterfowl, small seed -eating birds, muskrats, and other small mammals. Western mannagrass may be useful in seed mixtures aimed at increasing plant diversity while helping deter the invasion of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). The seed can be dried and ground into flour and was apparently eaten by Native Americans. Status Please consult the PLAN T S Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant's current status (e.g. threatened or endangered species, state noxious status, and wetland indicator values). Description and Adaptation Western mannagrass is a short-lived, cool season perennial grass with flaccid stems (culms) that reach a height of 70 to 150 cm. The form is moderately coarse textured, clumpy, and upright to nearly flat: spreading from rhizomes or decumbent (low lying) stems that root at the nodes (joints). When submerged in spring, this species produces floating stems and leaves, but flowering is reduced. Leaf blades are ribbon-like, 4 to 13 mm wide, and 15 to 30 cm long. Flowerheads (panicles) are narrow and 15 to 40 cm long, with appressed branches and long cylindrical spikelets (the groupings of individual florets or flowers). The flowering period is long, from May to September. Western mannagrass occurs from British Columbia south to California and east to Idaho and Nevada at elevations below 4000 feet. Key to identification: Western mannagrass is easily confused with northern mannagrass (Glyceria borealis) and slender spiked mannagrass (Glyceria leptostachya) which are found in similar aquatic habitats. Western mannagrass has larger florets (individual flowers) and the seed is three times larger compared to the other two. A botanical key, scale, and hand lens are needed for proper identification. mannagrass, and waxy mannagrass. Relative abundance in the wild. This species is widely occurring and common in the Pacific Uses Northwest at low elevations, especially along streams Western mannagrass is a native species important for and in wet meadow depressions. Despite the long restoration of freshwater marshes, vernal pools, and flowering period, seed collection is laborious because depressions within wetland prairies. The species retention is poor: the seed drops (shatters) very easily rapid growth, underground stems, and floating leaves when green and not fully mature. However, aid in reducing erosion along the edges of streams additional seed may be held within the lower leaf and lakes where it naturally occurs. In the Pacific sheath and can be removed by threshing. Northwest, this grass is recommended for use in stormwater management, including detention ponds Adaptation: This species is easy to establish and and biofiltration swales that are wet year round. The grow on adapted sites. It can volunteer readily. foliage and seeds provide food and cover for United States Department of Agriculture -Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Materials <http://plant-materials.nres.usda.gov/> Plant Fact Sheet/Guide Coordination Page <http://plant-materials.nres.usda.gov/intranet/pfs.html> National Plant Data Center <http://npdc.usda.gov> J ------- llal UaMl II UUIIUJI I. 3UIPU] dIULUS - IVdLIVe... -1: l_r�' .. _ _ _. ! (,1 .- -. Searcr� ,7 j liIfoi°i-ii Ition no Services for King Countij, Washingt:on-' u. Oi -I e Go to my plant fist i=inci a i'!dh; h rdstem bulrush (no plants selected) add this plant La !li rirt'U-!o _i�!CIc_ _pa I^ Scirpus acutus Deciduous Grass -like Height: 9 ft. Availability: Low Growing ease: Medium Moisture req.: wet /} l �+ Exposure req.: sun • - _._ + . '�,,, I ©Greg Rabourn Hardstem bulrush used to clean residential septic effluent (enlarge) r Plant description: This very tall bulrush has tough, round stems and works well along lakes and marshes. Needs saturated soil conditons and sun. Spreads by rhizomes. Seeds are important food for waterfowl. Keywords: aggressive, birds, narrow, perennial (non -woody), spreading, upright Articles that mention this plant: Guidance for Shoreline Plantings Plans that use this plant:Wet, sunny Native Plant Nurseries in Washin ton State I Native Plant Resources I Rain Barrel lnformatton and Sources ��JJJ Replace Lawn with Native Plants Stewardship I ❑epartmentofNaturaI Resources and Parks I Water and Land Resources Division Home I Privacy I Accessibility I Terms of use I Search Links to a)dernal sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other JKing County web pages, you a)pressly agree to be bound byterms and conditions ofthe site. © 2008 King County I j �reen.klngcounty.gov/gonative/Plant.asp... 1/1 U//13/LU11 Soft Stem Bulrush Soft Stem Bulrush Back Flonle Up Next ]Blue Grater Lily Bluebell Gentian �r�:j� :i►��,�� = f }fir-.�s'!� Flouter Marsh Fleabane Dx-E e Dais Me & Small Coast Water Clover Water L •sso Water Stargxa White-Toppe+ Wild Cote ea Wilahts Haug Yellow Water JYellow Water J 3tiveplantproject.com/.../soft_stem_bulr... lilt 1 1/2 Qapc�r�� oo�g9 CONSULTING ENGINEERS/CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN RUSSIAN UKRANLAN PAROUSIA SDA CHURCH 1860 SOUTH 336TH STREET. FEDERAL WAY, WA FOR wASHINGTON CONFERENCE OF SDA 32229 WEYERHAEUSER WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA R.E.I. JOB NO. 11032 September 16, 2011 Revision No. 1 July 12, 2012 12EVIT104 NO, zr lwdv zX 2Qiz 1519 West Valley Highway North/Suite 1 U1 Post Office Box 836/Auburn, WA 98071 253-833-7776 Fax 253-939-2168 RESUBMMED NOV 0 9 '2012 CITY OF FEDERAL kNAY CDS Page 1 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN The project is to construct an 8,800 square foot Seventh Day Adventist (SDA) church building at 1860 South 336"' Street. The following table describes the anticipated daily use of the church facilities during the week. SDA church observes the Sabbath from Friday sunset to Saturday sunset. To keep the weekly 1 Sabbath holy, Adventists abstain from secular work on Saturday. They will also usually refrain from purely secular forms of recreation, such as competitive sport and watching non -religious programs on television. However, nature walks, family -oriented activities, charitable work and other activities that are compassionate in nature are encouraged. The major weekly worship service occurs on Saturday. The following is the anticipated use of the church during the week. The chart was prepared by the current Pastor of the Russian -Ukrainian "Parousia" SDA church Vit Krushen. PP in the chart is for People at the lchurch during the hour of time. PK is the number of parking stalls used during the hour of time. J I J Russian -Ukrainian "Parousia" SDA Church, Anticipated Daily Use Time Mondays Tuesdays Wed nesda s Thursdays Fridays Saturda s Sunda PP PK PP PK PP PK PP PK PP PK PP PK PP PK 6:OOam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:OOam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:OOam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:OOam 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 50 25 20 10 10:00am 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 249 83 20 10 11:00am 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 249 83 20 10 12:OOnoon 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 249 1 83 20 10 1:00 m 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 249 83 20 10 2:00 m 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 20 10 3:00 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10 4:00 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10 5:00 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10 6:00 m 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 15 5 50 20 7:00 m 20 10 20 10 20 10 20 10 50 25 100 50 50 25 8:00 m 20 10 20 10 20 10 20 10 50 25 100 50 50 25 9:00 m 20 10 20 10 20 10 20 10 50 25 100 50 50 25 The parking at the site will follow the standards of The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation 4`s Edition Land Use: 560 Church average study parking demand versus seat and gross floor area. The ITE average peak parking demands are as follows: ITE Averse Peak Parking Demands for Churches AVERAGE PEAK PERIOD PARKING MEASURED PEAK PERIOD DEMAND AVERAGE SEATING 0.20 VEHICLES PER SEAT GROSS FLOOR AREA 8.37 VEHICLES PER 1,000 SF GFA Page 2 Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation average peak period parking standard the minimum number of parking stalls required would be 82. A special event parking demand was determined using the International Building Code occupancy loads for the church using the same ITE average peak period seating standard of 0.2 vehicles per occupant/seat. Please see the parking requirement calculations on the following table: SDA ITE REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATIONS SPECIAL EVENT ITE BASED ON IBC SDA CHURCH AVERAGE REQUIRED OCCUPANCY MAXED ROOM NAME IBC CODE PEAK ITE PEAK OUT i T E AVE SPECIAL ROOM OCCUPANCY PERIOD PARKING AREA LOAD DEMAND STALLS DEMAND PRK REQ. PLATFORM 0.2 (USEABLE SPACE) 655 61 8.37 5 12 SANCTUARY 1917 251 0.2 50 0.2 50 MULTI -PURPOSE 0.2 ROOM 2127 142 8.37 18 28 KENDERGARTEN 295 15 8.37 2 0.2 3 JUNIORS 300 15 8.37 3 0•2 3 CRADLEROLL 298 15 8.37 2 0.2 3 FAMILY ROOM 138 9 8.37 1 �� 0.2 2 TOTAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED 82 102 For the daily parking standard use of the site the SDA church is providing 83 parking stall which will provide the required parking for peak Saturday worship service use. A special use event in which is above normal use of the building we have assumed to be the 508 IBC occupancy load capacity, would require 102 parking stalls. 19 stalls would be required to be located at another location off site and occupants will walk across the street at the sigualized crosswalk at South 336'h and 20 Ave South. The overflow off site parking will be at the Christio Faith Center on the opposite side of the street of.20t` Ave S. Saturdays which are the day the special event at the church would occur, are not a day when Christian Faith Center is normally meeting. Please attached letter from Christian Faith Center allows- g this use Traffic Queueing Heath and Associated has performed a traffic study for the SDA church. Please see the attached report for Queueing results. Page 3 Land Use: 560 Church Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs. Seats On a: Sunday Peale Period 9:00 a.m.-4:00 .m.; 7:00-8:00 p.m. Number of Study Sites 12 Avera a Size of Study Sites 388 seats Average Peals Period PaCkIng Demand 0.20 vehicles per seat Standard Deviation 0.15 Coefficient of Variation 7711/6 Range 0.03-0.65 vehicles per seat 85th Percentile 0.25 vehicles p2r seat. 33rd Percentile _ 0.14 vehicles per seat Sunday Peak Pa6od Parking Demand 300 250 200 150 - L 100 50 0 ,------ 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 x Seats Q Institute of Transportation Engineers • Actual Data Points [ 1601 Farfcrng Generation 4th Edition �Y. Land Use: 560 Church Ave -rage Peak Period Parking Demand vs. 1,000 sq. fit. GFA On a: Sunday 9:00 a.m.-1:00 .m.; 7;00--8:00 p.m. Peak Period Number of Study Sites 12 Average Size of StugX Sites 13,200 sq. ft. GFA Aver a Peak Period Parkinp Demand 8.37 vehicles ppr 1,000 s . ft. GFA Standard Deviation 6.63 Coefficient of Variation 67% Ran a 1.82-16.94 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 85th Percentile 14.38 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 33rd Percentile 3.88 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Sunday Peak Period Parking Demand � 350 --- 300 e - 250 - :9 200 150 a 100 CL 50 0 10 20 30 40 x 1,000 sq. ft. GFA • Actual Data Points Institute of 7hansportation Engineers 11591 Parking Generation, Ah Editian J j J _j" '' ce R CRSEY T R E R T MINISTRY August 21, 2012 To: City of Federal Way, Community Development Services Department From: Christian Faith Center 33645 20th Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Russian -Ukrainian "Parousia" Church Parking Stalls On behalf of Christian Faith Center, this letter will act as notification that we have recently been approached by Russian -Ukrainian "Parousia" Church regarding the use of our parking stalls for their overflow parking needs. Please note that they've requested to use these stalls on Saturdays and this is not a day that Christian Faith Center would normally use the stalls; for this reason we don't see any conflict at this time. It is our understanding that on few occasions, totaling three or four times a year, the Russian -Ukrainian "Parousia" Church may need the stalls for Special Event overflow parking and have requested as many as 30 additional parking stalls. It would be our intent to have them utilize the Northeast area of our parking lot which will more than accommodate there needs. We require that each Special Event parking request will need to be coordinated directly with the Christian Faith Center Administrative Office at least 3 weeks in advance by calling 253-943-2400 ext. 2461. We look forward to sharing in the work and events of the Russian -Ukrainian "Parousia" Church. Sincerely, Rick Weisz Facilities Manager Christian Faith Center Direct: 206-412-1012 33645 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 206.824.8188 FAX 253.943.2305 CASEYTR EAT. C O M 41� HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Transportation and Civil Engineering RUSSIAN UKRAINIAN PAROUSIA CHURCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS City of Federal Way, WA M1 Prepared for: Dave Dorrnier, P.E. Rupert Engineering 1519 West Valley Highway N Aub=4 WA 983.32 October 2012 2214 Tacoma Road • Puyallup, WA 98371 • (253) 770-1401 • Fax (253) 770-1473 ' 1 RUSSIAN UK NIAN PAROUSIA CHURCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS �I iI. Introduction..................................................................................................................3 H. Project Description.......................................................................................................3 III. Existing Conditions......................................................................................................3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................9 V. Conclusions and Mitigation........................................................................................14 Appendix LIST OF TABLES 1. Existing Level of Service — School Peak Hour............................................................8 2. Project Trip Generation................................................................................................9 r 3. Future Level of Service..............................................................................................13 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Vicinity Map & Surrounding Roadways......................................................................4 2. Site Plan........................................................................................................................5 3. Existing School Peak Hour Volumes...........................................................................7 4. Trip Distribution & Assignment.................................................................................10 5. 2014 School Peak Hour Volumes Without Project....................................................11 6. 2014 School Peak Hour Volumes With Project.........................................................12 2 RUSSIAN UKRAINIAN PAROUSIA CHURCH TRAFFIC IlVIPACT ANALYSIS I. INTRODUCTION This study serves to investigate traffic impacts related to the proposed Russian Ukrainian Parousia Church. The main goals of this study focus on the assessment of existing traffic conditions and intersection congestion, forecasts of newly generated project traffic, and estimations of future intersection delay. The first task includes the collection of general 1 roadway information, road improvement information, entering sight distance data, and 1 peak hour traffic counts. Next, a detailed level of service analysis of the existing volumes is made to determine the present degree of intersection congestion. Forecasts of future traffic and dispersion patterns on the street system are then determined using established trip generation and distribution techniques. Following this forecast, the future service levels for the key intersections are investigated. As a final step, appropriate conclusions and possible off -site mitigation measures is defined. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Russian Ukrainian Parousia Church is a new Seventh Day Adventist Church with a proposed building size of approximately 8,832 square feet. The site is located on the northwest corner of the 20th Avenue S & S 336th Street intersection. The area is surrounded by a mix of residential and commercial land uses. Access to the site will be provided by two entrances onto 8th Street. For traffic purposes the project is forecasted for completion by 2014, which was used as the horizon analysis year. Figure 1 on the following page shows the site location and roadway system. The proposed site plan is given in Figure 2. M. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Surrounding Roadways S 336th Street S is an east -west roadway that borders the south side of the project site. Near the site there are two lanes of travel in each direction, plus a center two-way left turn lane. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Paving consists of asphalt concrete with lane widths around 11 feet. Shoulders in the area are curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Bike lanes are provided east of 20th Avenue S. l I I I I 7 i i i i i RUSSIAN UKRAINIAN PAROUSIA CHURCH HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC Transportation and Civil Engineering I R aua SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 20th Avenue S is a north -south, two-lane local road bordering the east side of the project. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Lane widths are roughly 11 feet. Sidewalks are provided along the site frontage, with other segments having grass/gravel shoulders. Turn lanes are provided at the intersection with 336th Street. B. Existing Peak Hour Volumes Field data for this study was collected in October of 2012. Traffic counts were taken to capture the proposed church's Saturday peak hour within 11 AM to 1 PM. This specific peak period was targeted for analysis purposes based on the Saturday service schedule for Seventh Day Adventist churches. Weekday AM and PM peak hour volumes would be minor. Note also that peak hour volumes from the proposed church would not overlap with the peak volumes from the Christian Faith Center to the south, which has services 1 and significant volumes during the Sunday peak hour. Existing Saturday peak hour 1 volumes for the targeted intersection of 20th Avenue & 336th Street are shown in Figure 3. Raw count data can be found in the appendix. C. Level of Service 1 Existing peak hour delays were determined through the use of the 2000 Highway i Capacity Manual. Capacity analysis is used to determine level of service (LOS) which is an established measure of congestion for transportation facilities. LOS is defined for a variety of facilities including intersections, freeways, arterials, etc. A complete definition i of level of service and related criteria can be found in the HCM. The methodology for determining the LOS at signalized intersections strives to determine the volume to ' capacity (v/c) ratios for the various intersection movements as well as the average control delay for those movements. Delay is generally used to measure the degree of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost time. Control delay, in particular, w includes movements at slower speeds and stops on intersection approaches as vehicles move up in queue position or slow down upstream of an intersection. Aside from the overall quantity of traffic, three specific factors influence signalized intersection LOS. These include the type of signal operation provided, the signal phasing pattern, and the specific allocation of green time. The methodology for determining the LOS at unsignalized intersections strives to determine the potential capacities for the various vehicle movements and ultimately determines the average total delay for each movement. Potential Capacity represents the number of additional vehicles that could effectively utilize a particular movement, which is essentially the equivalent of the difference between the movement capacity and the existing movement volume. Total delay is described as the elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. Average total delay is simply the mean total delay over the entire stream. A number of factors influence potential capacity and total delay including the availability/usefulness of gaps. 1J �J I 1 I J I i J i I i 1 The range for intersection level of service is LOS A to LOS F with the former indicating the best operating conditions with low control delays and the latter indicating the worst conditions with heavy control delays. Detailed descriptions of intersection LOS are given in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. LOS results for the key intersections can be found in Table 1. Level of service calculations were made through the use of the Synchro program. Intersection 20th Ave/336th St TABLE 1 Existing Saturday Peak Level of Service Delays given in Seconds Per Vehicle Control Geometry Signal Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall LOS Delay v/c B 15.9 C 20.9 A 2.9 A 7.8 B 16.4 0.64 As shown in the table, delays are mild in the LOS A to LOS C range for existing conditions during the Saturday peak hour. D. Pedestrian and Bicycle Activity Observations of pedestrian and bicycle activity were made at the key intersections during traffic counts and site visits. During the evening peak hour, mild pedestrian volumes were noted in the area. With sidewalks, crosswalks, and bike lanes provided in the area, some background non -motorist volumes may have a minor effect on vehicle progression. Project traffic is expected to be predominantly passenger vehicle based. E. Public Transit A review of the Pierce Transit and Metro Transit regional bus schedules indicates that transit service is provided along the project frontage. Pierce Transit Route 501 provides service between downtown Tacoma and the Federal Way Transit Center, with Saturday service in the vicinity roughly between 8:30 AM and 8:00 PM. Stops are provided along 336th Street and 9th Avenue. Metro Transit Route 182, and Pierce Transit Routes 402 and 500 provide service along Pacific Highway to the west. F. Sight Distance The proposed access points for the project will be onto 20th Avenue (25 mph) and 336th Street (35 mph). Sight distance measurements have previously been provided for this project and submitted to the City of Federal Way, indicating adequate sight available on 336th Street. 20th Avenue has negligible horizontal or vertical curvature, with available sight well over the 280 foot AASHTO minimum. 8 IV. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation Trip generation is used to determine the magnitude of project impacts on the surrounding 1 1 street system. This is denoted by the quantity or specific number of new trips that enter or exit a project during a designated time period, such as a specific peak hour or an entire day. Data presented in this report was taken from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication, Trip Generation, 8th Edition. The designated land use for this project is defined as Church (LUC 560). A summary of this data is given in Table 2. Included are average daily traffic, AM peak hour volumes, PM peak hour volumes, and 1 1 the Saturday peak hour volumes for the proposed 8,832 square foot church. Note that the Saturday volumes for this site were taken from the default ITE Sunday volumes for the 1 typical LUC 560 data, as it is a Seventh Day Adventist Church with Saturday services. TABLE 2 Project Trip Generation 8,832 sf Church Time Period Volume ADWT Total 80 vpd AM Peak Inbound 3 vph AM Peak Outbound 2 vph AM Peak Total 5 vph PM Peak Inbound 2 vph PM Peak Outbound 3 vph PM Peak Total 5 vph Saturday Daily 324 vpd Saturday Peak Inbound 52 vph Saturday Peak Outbound 52 vph Saturday Peak Total 104 vph B. Trip Assignment and Distribution The destination and origination of future project traffic determines how vehicles at the site driveways and nearby major intersections will distribute to and from outlying areas. J The trip assignment and distribution scheme developed for this project was used to determine the specific paths of travel for traffic into and out of the site. The trips generated by the church during the Saturday peak hour are expected to follow the general trip pattern as shown in Figure 4. Distribution percentages are based primarily on the roadway network and location of residential areas in the city. J J 5 336TH/ENT 5 33GTH/ENT 20TH/ENT 20TH/ENT 26 14 2s 14 1 1 5 0 5 sroP 4-0 0—► STOP �o SATo—♦ STOP PEAKSATURDAY CFEAK WKDAY PMPEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR7 0 AT I I RUSSIAN UKRAINIAN PAROUSIA CHURCH HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC TRIP DISTRIBUTION t A551GNMENT Transportation and Civil Engineering FIGURE 4 j j I I I I I j I I j i C. Future Peak Hour Volumes The owners of the project anticipate completion of the build out by 2014. This time period was also used as the horizon study year for analysis purposes. The future 2014 traffic volumes without the project built was calculated by applying a 3 percent growth rate to the existing volumes of Figure 3. Future 2014 volumes without the project are shown in Figure 5. Figure 6 represents 2014 Saturday peak hour volumes with project traffic included. D. Level of Service A level of service analysis was made of future 2014 Saturday peak hour volumes with and without project generated trips added to the primary intersection and entrance nodes. Results for intersection delay conditions were again determined using Synchro. A summary of the analysis results is shown below in Table 3. TAB)L)F 3 2014 Saturday Peak Level of Service Delays given in seconds per vehicle Without Project With Project Intersection Control Jjt?proach LOS Delay v/c LOS Deaay v/c 20th Ave/336th St Signal Eastbound B 16.2 B 16.3 Westbound C 21.8 C 23.7 Northbound A 2.7 A 2.7 Southbound A 7.8 A 7.7 Overall B 16.9 0.67 B 17.8 0.72 336th St/Entrance Stop Southbound - _ - B 13.5 0.16 Eastbound LT - A 8.3 0.05 20th Ave/Entrance Stop Eastbound - - - A 9.5 0.03 Northbound - - - A 0.7 0.01 Table 3 shows future traffic volumes with the project will remain mild at LOS C or better. This analysis shows the project accesses and the 20th Avenue/336th Street intersection have the capacity to serve the peak project traffic. JE. Queues 95th percentile queue length output from Synchro was analyzed to determine if on -site circulation or operations at the project entrances could be hindered. Typical vehicle headways are 25 feet, with program results providing the calculated queue that will not be exceeded for the 95th percentile. As such the output does not necessarily give queues in multiples of whole vehicle lengths, and can result in calculated queues of less than one vehicle length. �_ 13 The 95th percentile results for the 20th Avenue & 336th Street intersection show an eastbound queue length of 125 feet and a southbound queue length of 38 feet. As the project entrance on 336th Street is located approximately 160 feet from the westbound approach stop bar, and the entrance on 20th Avenue is approximately 130 feet from the stop bar, adjacent street queues should typically not hinder outbound project traffic based on the assumed trip distribution. The availability of two accesses will also allow for shifting of project traffic to lessen any potential queue impacts on eastbound 336th Street. Internal project queues should be low, with Synchro output showing a 14 foot southbound queue at the 336th Street entrance, and a 2 foot eastbound queue at the 20th Avenue entrance. The peak hour factor was chosen to assume half of the peak hour project traffic occurs during one 15 minute interval. F. Left Turn Warrants Fundamental left turn warrant analysis procedures have been developed to determine whether or not a left turn pocket would be required at an intersection given specific traffic and geometric conditions. For this particular study, procedures described in the WSDOT Design Manual (Exhibit 1310-15a) were used to assess left turn storage needs on 20th Avenue at the project access. An analysis was not performed for the 336th Street access, as a center left turn lane is already provided. Based on a review of the warrant nomographs a designated left turn lane would not be required on 20th Avenue at the project entrance. Analysis was based on 2014 traffic volumes with project traffic. A copy of the WSDOT nomograph and input values can be found in the appendix. V. CONCLUSIONS AND MITIGATION The proposed Russian Ukrainian Parousia Church will consist of a 8,832 square foot church building on the northwest corner of 20th Avenue and 336th Street in the City of Federal Way. The project is expected to be a low generator of trips in the area during the typical weekday peak hours. Trip generation of the site was based on ITE data assuming the Saturday peak volumes would be similar to typical Sunday volumes of other churches. Approximately 80 weekday daily trips are expected, with 5 trips expected during the AM peak hour and 5 trips during the PM peak hour. Saturdays are expected to see the highest volumes due to services, with 324 daily trips and 104 Saturday peak hour volumes. J Mild Saturday peak hour volumes currently exist at the 20th Avenue & 336th Street intersection. Future 2012 Saturday peak delays with project traffic included are expected to be in the LOS A to LOS C range. A center left turn lane is already provided for 336th Street at the project entrance, while left turn lane warrants are not met for the 20th Avenue project entrance. J Based on the above, no mitigation is proposed aside from any mitigation fees that may be determined by the City of Federal Way through concurrency analysis. 14 J I _ RUSSIAN UKRAINIAN PAROUSIA CHURCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX I I j j j 15 j LEVEL OF SERVICE The following are excerpts from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board. I The concept of levels of service uses qualitative measures that characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and passengers. The descriptions of individual levels of service characterize these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort 1 and convenience. Six levels of service are defined for each facility for which analysis procedures are available. They are given letter designations, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions. Level -of -Service definitions The following definitions generally define the various levels of service for arterials. Level of service A represents primarily free -flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Vehicles are seldom impeded in their ability to maneuver in the traffic stream. Delay at signalized intersections is minimal. Level of service B represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the free -flow speed for the arterial classification. The ability to maneuver in the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and delays are not bothersome. Level of service C represents stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the average free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Level of service D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in approach delay and hence decreases in arterial speed. LOS D may Jcombination be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some 40 of free -flow speed. of these. Average travel speeds are about percent J Level of service E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of one- third the free -flow speed or less. Such operations are caused by some combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. 16 -1 Level of service F characterizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds, from less than one- 1 third to one -quarter of the free -flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical 1 signalized locations, with long delays and extensive queuing. These definitions are general and conceptual in nature, and they apply primarily to uninterrupted flow. Levels of service for interrupted flow facilities vary widely in terms of both the user's perception of service quality and the operational variables used to describe them. For each type of facility, levels of service are defined based on one or more operational parameters that best describe operating quality for the subject facility type. While the concept of level of service attempts to address a wide range of operating conditions, limitations on data collection and availability make it impractical to treat the full range of �l operational parameters for every type of facility. The parameters selected to define levels J of service for each facility type are called "measures of effectiveness" or "MOE's", and represent available measures that best describe the quality of operation on the subject facility type. J J I J J Each level of service represents a range of conditions, as defined by a range in the parameters given. Thus, a level of service is not a discrete condition, but rather a range of conditions for which boundaries are established. The following tables describe levels of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time. Specifically, level -of -service criteria are stated in terms of the average stopped delay per vehicle for a 15-minute analysis period. Level of service for unsignalized intersections is measured in terms of potential capacity and averse total delay of the lane in question. Signalized Intersections - Level of Service Stopped Delay per Level of Service Vehicle (sec) A <_10 B > 10 and <_20 C > 20 and :!05 D > 35 and <_55 E > 55 and _<80 F > 80 17 J Unsignalized Intersections - Level of Service Average Total Delay Level of Service per Vehicle (seed A <_10 B >10and <_15 C >15and _525 D > 25 and _<35 E > 35 and 550 F > 50 As described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, level of service breakpoints for all - way stop controlled (AWSC) intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an AWSC intersection. Thus a higher level of control delay is acceptable at a signalized intersection for the same level of service. AWSC Intersections - Level of Service Average Total Delay Level of Service per Vehicle (sect A <_10 B >10and _515 C > 15 and _<25 D > 25 and 05 E >35 and <_50 F > 50 18 LUC 560 Summary of Trip Generation Calculation For 8.832 Th.Sq.Ft. GFA of Church October 22, 2012 Average Standard Adjustment Driveway Rate Deviation Factor Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 9.11 7.20 1.00 80 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.35 0.00 1.00 3 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.21 0.00 1.00 2 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 0.56 1.45 1.00 5 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 0.26 0.00 1.00 2 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 0.29 0.00 1.00 3 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 0.55 0.87 1.00 5 AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter 0.48 0.00 1.00 4 AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit 0.39 0.00 1.00 3 AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total 0.87 1.57 1.00 8 PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter 0.51 0.00 1.00 5 PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit 0.43 0.00 1.00 4 PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total 0.94 1.26 1.00 8 Saturday 2-Way Volume 10.37 16.74 1.00 92 Saturday Peak Hour Enter 2.51 0.00 1.00 22 Saturday Peak Hour Exit 1.03 0.00 1.00 9 Saturday Peak Hour Total 3.54 6.87 1.00 31 Sunday 2-Way Volume 36.63 29.13 1.00 324 Sunday Peak Hour Enter 5.88 0.00 1.00 52 Sunday Peak Hour Exit 5.88 0.00 1.00 52 Sunday Peak Hour Total 11.76 8.31 1.00 104 Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS J J Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 C,rni im Prinlarl- I Inch IhArl File Name : 3365a Site Code : 00003365 Start Date : 10/13/2012 Page No : 1 20TH AVE S 336TH ST S 20TH AVE S 336TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru I Left Ri ht I Thru I Left Ri ht I Thru I Left Right I Thru I Left Int. Total Factor 1.01 1.0 1.0 1,01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 11:00 AM 11 1 12 12 38 3 3 2 0 0 58 2 142 11:15 AM 7 0 5 14 53 4 1 1 1 0 36 4 126 11:30 AM 12 3 14 17 43 4 7 0 1 0 35 3 139 11.45 AM Is 2 10 10 58 5 5 0 1 0 61 11 169 Total 36 6 41 53 192 16 16 3 3 0 190 20 576 12:00 PM 7 2 11 12 54 6 2 0 0 2 46 4 146 12:15 PM 11 1 13 9 52 1 8 0 1 1 50 6 153 12:30 PM 6 1 15 16 62 5 2 0 0 1 53 7 168 12:45 PM 8 0 8 8 49 2 6 1 2 1 73 3 161 Total 32 4 47 45 217 1,1 18 1 3 5 222 20 628 Grand Total 68 10 88 98 409 30 J 34 4 6 5 412 40 1204 Apprch % 41.0 6.0 53.0 18.2 76.2 5.6 I 771.3 9.1 13.6 1.1 I 90.2 8.8 Total % 5.6 0.8 7.3 8.1 34.0 2.5 2.8 0.3 0.5 0.4 34.2 3.3 STFfA�E S Out In Total 142 308 68 1 88 Fr ht Thru Left AO � North rT N y r r-1 ew t01131201211:0 AO AM 4 a N� z m ~ OfI31201212:45:00 PM ."CA u7 .CA o Uruhlad rm o o Left Thru Ri I N 6 41 34 ® S9 Out In Total 20TH AVE 5 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3365a Site Code : 00003365 Start Date : 10/13/2012 Page No : 2 20TH AVE S Southbound I 336TH ST S Westbound I 20TH AVE S Northbound 336TH ST S Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru I Left Right I Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total Total Total Total Total eak Hour From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 11:45 AM Volume 30 6 49 85 47 226 17 290 17 0 2 19 4 210 28 242 636 Percent 35.3 7.1 57.6 16.2 77.9 5.9 89.5 0.0 10.5 1.7 86.8 11.6 11-45 6 2 10 18 10 58 5 73 5 0 1 6 0 61 11 72 169 Volume Peak Factor 0.941 High Int. 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:15 PM 11:45 AM Volume 11 1 13 25 16 62 5 83 8 0 1 9 0 61 11 72 Peak Factor 01850 0.873 0.528 0.840 2 Out In Total 75 85 160 tt �Lo 1 I 'p ]] 4 N North M w h N s 1 W1312012 11:45:00 n> > ~ d131201212:30:00 PM 2 o c9 v "' o N u�st,Inea HE° Le!t rThruR,,[I22746Out al 20THAVES Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Saturday Peak 1: S 336th St & 20th Ave S 1I0/22/2012 --* --p. 'r 4---I * # -4/ Lane Group EBL LBT EBR V1JBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I + if V1 T I T I T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 100 0 0 200 0 100 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.974 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1900 1615 1805 1851 0 1805 1615 0 1805 1615 0 Fit Permitted 0.419 0.518 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 796 1900 1615 984 1851 0 1805 1615 0 1805 1615 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 19 657 557 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 231 1152 302 199 Travel Time (s) 5.3 26.2 6.9 4.5 Volume (vph) 28 210 4 17 226 47 2 0 17 49 0 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 33 250 5 20 260 54 4 0 32 58 0 42 Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 250 5 20 314 0 4 32 0 58 42 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Split Split Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Detector Phases 7 4 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 6.0 6.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 0.0 7.0 7.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 14.5% 36.4% 36.4% 14.5% 36.4% 0.0% 12.7% 12.7% 0.0% 36.4% 36.4% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 4.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 16.0 3.0 3.0 16.0 16.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 14.2 13.2 13.2 13.3 11.9 3.1 3.1 16.4 16.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.25 0.26 0.07 0.07 0.35 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.46 0.01 0.06 0.64 0.03 0.04 0.09 0.05 Control Delay 11.2 16.7 8.5 11.5 21.5 25.0 0.1 13.4 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.2 16.7 8.5 11.5 21.5 25.0 0.1 13.4 0.1 Baseline Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Saturday Peak 1: S 336th St & 20th Ave S 1I0/22/2012 'A t # Lane Gfoup EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NOT NBR SOL SBT SBR LOS B B A B C C A B A Approach Delay 15.9 20.9 2.9 7.8 Approach LOS B C A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 50 0 4 61 1 0 9 0 Queue Length e5th (ft) 17 141 6 13 141 5 0 33 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 151 1072 222 119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 200 100 Base Capacity (vph) 300 665 568 312 607 120 721 639 931 —� Starvation Cap Fleductn 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductrn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.38 0.01 0.06 0.52 0.03 0.04 0.09 0.05 intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length,- 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 46.3 I Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 1 Snkt- anti Phases: 1: S 336th St & 20th Ave S - r -- — - o2 - o6 4 m3 o4 7s 20sT 1. GS 20s JI --1 o7 08 8s 1 1120s Baseline Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Saturday Peak Without Project 1: S 336th St & 20th Ave S 10/22/2012 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBFi NBl_ NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I + r V1 U T I 1+ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 100 0 0 200 0 100 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.974 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1900 1615 1805 1851 0 1805 1615 0 1805 1615 0 Fit Permitted 0.390 0.494 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 741 1900 1615 939 1851 0 1805 1615 0 1805 1615 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 19 642 541 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 231 1152 302 199 Travel Time (s) 5.3 26.2 6.9 4.5 Volume (vph) 30 223 4 18 240 50 2 0 18 52 0 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 36 265 5 21 276 57 4 0 34 61 0 45 Lane Group Flow (vph) 36 265 5 21 333 0 4 34 0 61 45 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Split Split Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Detector Phases 7 4 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 6.0 6.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 0.0 7.0 7.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 14.5% 36.4% 36.4% 14.5% 36.4% 0.0% 12.7% 12.7% 0.0% 36.4% 36.4% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 4.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 16.0 3.0 3.0 16.0 16.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 14.4 13.5 13.5 13.6 12.1 3.1 3.1 16.4 16.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.07 0.35 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.48 0.01 0.07 0.67 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.05 Control Delay 11.4 17.0 8.5 11.6 22.4 25.0 0.1 13.5 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.4 17.0 8.5 11.6 22.4 25.0 0.1 13.5 0.1 Baseline Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Saturday Peak Without Project 1: S 336th St & 20th Ave S 1I0/22/2012 ---* --,, f- t # Lane GrOUP EBL EBT EBR WBI_ WBT WBR NBA_ NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS B B A B C C A B A Approach Delay 16.2 21.8 2.7 7.8 Approach LOS 9 C A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 53 0 4 66 1 0 9 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 118 6 13 151 5 0 35 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 151 1072 222 119 Tum Bay Length (ft) 100 200 100 Base Capacity (vph) 291 665 568 307 607 119 706 635 919 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.40 0.01 0.07 0.55 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.05 l 1 11terSediO l SUMnlafy 1 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 55 1 Actuated Cycle Length: 46.5 Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.61 1 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: S 336th St & 20th Ave S o2 o6 o3 '� o4 20s o7 18 8$I I 20s I I I Baseline Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 2 J Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Saturday Peak With Project 1: S 336th St & 20th Ave S 10/22/2012 --I -► --* '< .4\ t ' ,� -4/ Lane Group EBL EBT ERR WBL WBT WB3R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT sBR Lane Configurations I T r T+ I T. Vii I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 100 0 0 200 0 100 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.967 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1900 1615 1805 1837 0 1805 1615 0 1805 1615 0 Flt Permitted 0.331 0.468 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 629 1900 1615 889 1837 0 1805 1615 0 1805 1615 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 26 618 525 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 231 1152 302 199 Travel Time (s) 5.3 26.2 6.9 4.5 Volume (vph) 30 237 4 18 254 57 2 0 18 59 0 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.70 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.85 0.70 0.70 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 36 282 5 21 292 81 4 0 34 69 0 54 Lane Group Flow (vph) 36 282 5 21 373 0 4 34 0 69 54 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Split Split Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Detector Phases 7 4 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 6.0 6.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 0.0 7.0 7.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 14.5% 36.4% 36.4% 14.5% 36.4% 0.0% 12.7% 12.7% 0.0% 36.4% 36.4% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 4.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 16.0 3.0 3.0 16.0 16.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 15.0 14.1 14.1 14.2 12.7 3.1 3.1 16.3 16.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.30 0.30 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.07 0.35 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.50 0.01 0.07 0.72 0.03 0.05 0.11 0.06 Control Delay 11.5 17.1 8.5 11.6 24.3 25.0 0.1 13.7 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.5 17.1 8.5 11.6 24.3 25.0 0.1 13.7 0.1 Baseline Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 I I 1 I J Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Saturday Peak With Project 1: S 336th St & 20th Ave S 110/22/2012 * Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS B B A B C C A B A Approach Delay 16.3 23.7 2.7 7.7 Approach LOS B C A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 58 0 4 74 1 0 11 0 Queue Length 95th,(it) 18 125 6 13 169 5 0 38 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 151 1072 222 119 Tum i3ay Length (ff) 100 200 100 Base Capacity (vph) 273 665 568 305 607 117 683 626 903 Starvation Cap geductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Rediuctn 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.42 0.01 0.07 0.61 0.03 0.05 0.11 0.06 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 55, Actuated Cycle Length: 47.1 Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Fratiai: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.8 Intersection Capacity Utilisation 40.111fo Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: S 336th St & 20th Ave S Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service, A 4t o2 I i* 1Cm3 —* o4 7s 20§ ss 2[}s -14 ai m$ 8.s 20 s Baseline Heath & Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2014 Saturday Peak With Project 5: S 336th St & Entrance 10/22/2012 Movement EEL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations I + Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh%h) 26 257 280 14 14 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.84 0.87 0.50 0.50 0.50 Nourlyi.flo, rate, (vph) 52 306 322 28 28 52 Pedestrians Lane 1'lalidtli (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median lype None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 231 pX, platoon unblocked 0.85 0.85 0.85 VC, conflicting volume 350 746 336 1 V61, stage 1 conf vol I vU, stage 2 cohf Vol vCu, unblocked vol 233 700 216 to, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (S) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 95 92 93 j cM' capacity (veh/h) 11141 330 702 1 direction, Lane tr EB 1 ES 2 WB 1 SB 1 - Volume Total 52 306 350 80 j Volume Left 52 0 0 28 j Volume Right U 0 28 52 cSH 1141 1700 1700 504 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.18 024 0.16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 0 14 ontral belay (s). 813 0.0 0.0 1-3.5 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (8) 1.2 0.0 135 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.9 J Intersection, Capacity Utilization 31.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 J I Baseline Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 J I CITY OF Federal Way PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 33325 8 h Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003-6325 253-835-2700;Fax 253-835-2709 wwwA iyoffede ralway.com CONCURRENCy APPLICATION INFORMATION What is a Concurrency Application? The City uses the concurrency application to look at new development's impact on the transportation network. The purpose of the test is to verify if there is adequate capacity in the transportation network and identify possible mitigation for failing intersections. The test uses the City's adopted level of service standards (LOS) as identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a basis for determining whether new development can proceed. Concurrency application is required for all development permits within the city that generate new trips in the PM peak hour, except for development exempt under FWRC 19.90.060 of the Transportation Concurrency Management Ordinance. All new development must pass concurrency test before completing other land use processes. When is a Concurrency Application Required? An application must be submitted concurrent with a development activity permit application that generates one or more PM peak hour trips. The applicant may request a concurrency feasibility analysis at any time. However, since a concurrency feasibility analysis application is not tied to a development permit, a Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC) will not be issued. What needs to be submitted with the Concurrency Application? ❑ Completed Concurrency Application ❑ To scale site plan ❑ Vicinity map ❑ Independent Trip Generation to be considered (if available). All required information in the Concurrency Application must be felled out or the application will be returned. Traffic Division staff will review the completeness of the application and contact the applicant iff other information is needed. The application will be vested at the time the Concurrency Application is deemed complete. How much is my concurrency permit application fees? And when do I pay this fee? Application fees for the concurrency application will be based on the total new trips the development is estimated to generate. The Public Works Department uses information provided (project size and land use type) in the preapplication application to estimate the number of trips and the appropriate application fee as outlined in Table 1 below. Concurrency permit application fees must be paid concurrent with the underlying land use application submittal. This fee may change if the proposed development is significantly different than the project scope as provided in the preapplication application. At the applicant's discretion, the applicant may hire their own Engineer licensed in the State of Washington to calculate the trip generation. Table 1 - FW Concurrency Application Fee Net New PM Peak Hour Trips Less than 10 10-50 51-500 Greater Than 500 Total Concurrency Application Fee $344.50 $1,584.50 $3,374.50 $5,576.50 (2012 rates) I I Am I finished with this process after I paid the concurrency permit application fee? No. The concurrency review process is the first phase of your development project's process with the Public Works Department. Once staff has completed the concurrency analysis, the applicant and/or owner will be notified of the result (Pass or Fail). If the project "Passes" the concurrency test, staff will issue a Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC) allowing the project to proceed to other applicable development permit processes. If the project "Fails" the concurrency test, staff will propose mitigation measure(s) to address the LOS failure at that particular intersection(s). Examples of mitigation measures could be: ■ Construct turn lanes ■ Modify or construct a new traffic signal ■ Other traffic control measures (such as channelization improvements) The applicant has 30 calendar days to review and response to staff proposed mitigation. Within that period, the applicant must either accept staff recommended mitigation or propose alternative mitigation measures for any LOS failure. Once an agreement has been reached on the mitigation measures, staff will issue a Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC), allowing the project to proceed with other applicable permit processes. However, if the applicant fails to respond with the 30 days period, a "Denial" letter will be issue and the project will not be approved. If my project fails the concurrency test, what are my options? 1. Accept staff proposed mitigation measure(s), 2. Reduce the size of the development or change the type of uses to reduce the trip generation rate until the standard is met; 3. Delay the application until additional improvements have been identified by the City in the 6-Year (TIP) or constructed by others; 4. Propose appropriate mitigation to include Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures. The proposed mitigation measures shall be constructed and approved concurrent with the development, usually prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Depending on what option is chosen, the applicant may have to restart the concurrency application process again. Can I appeal the Concurrency Denial Notice? Yes. The applicant may appeal the concurrency denial notice as part of the appeal process for the underlying Development Permit application. How long does a Capacity Reserve Certificate last? As long as there is activity on the Development Permit and you do not change the trip generation characteristics of the development (no increase in net new trips is incurred from a change in the project), the CRC Certificate vests the development's new trips for the life of the project. If the project's size changes significantly as determine by the Public Works Department staff, the applicant may need to go through the process again and pay another fee. What if my project changes? Any thing that changes the trip generation rates can generate a need for an amendment to the process, and this process may start over. If the trip generation is greater than 10% of the original estimated trip generated rates the project will require an amendment and the process starts over. Please be conservative and as specific about your project as you can. If you have any questions please ask. What if I do not have a development permit ready for my project? Staff can provide the same level of analysis as a feasibility study for the project. However, the estimated trips generated by the project analyzed will not be reserved or vested. If you decide to proceed with the project, staff will revise the analysis using any transferable data at our hourly rate. Does this mean we will never have to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis? No. The Public Works staff will calculate your trips and identity impacts to the City Transportation system. The following are examples of additional requirements the applicant may need to hire an Engineer to complete: * Parking Demand and Utilization a Queuing and gap analysis Specialized Land Use and Trip Generation ■ Sight Distance Analysis a Neighborhood Traffic Impacts = Design of Mitigation Improvements (such as signals, turn lanes, access, or new roads) a Traffic impacts over 100 trips in other peak hours (morning and weekends) What is the Concurrency Permit Process? A flow chart diagram of the process is depicted on the back page. If you have any additional questions, please contact Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer (253) 835-2743. I 1 -1 I I I I j 1 -1 I I LADEPT\PW\TRA\Concurrency\CN TemplateTinal Template\Concurency Permit Process Sept 2010.doc I 11 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2014 Saturday Peak With Project 2: Entrance & 20th Ave S II 10/22/2012 -A --v 4\ t i Movement EBL EBR NBL NET SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y 4 'll4- Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 5 7 7 80 90 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.53 0.85 0.50 Hourly flow rate (vph) 10 14 14 151 106 10 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 199 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 290 111 116 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 290 111 116 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 99 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 698 948 1485 Direction, Lane ## E8 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 24 165 116 Volume Left 10 14 0 Volume Right 14 0 10 cSH 825 1485 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.01 0.07 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 1 0 Control Delay (s) 9.5 0.7 0.0 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay (s) 9.5 0.7 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 CONCURRENCY PERMIT PROCESS (START) - Applicant submit Concurrency application with appropriate fee FSperforms trip 0 _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — g.=*Iion/assignment ^ 1 _ 1 r ! I 1 Staff *performs I concurrence analysis 1 - 1 ' 1 I I I ! PASSED Concurrency FAIL I 1 — — — — Result ! I I I I j I ! i I Staff * proposes I 1 I mitigation for failing 1 intersections 1 11 l I I r I I 1 Staff issues Concurrent YES Applicant NO y�---- — — — ——— accepts I Reserve Certificate mitigation? I : 1 E r 1 j I J I I <Applicant I Staff issues NOposes YE To Development Denial lettermative Permit process gation I * Denotes tasks that may be prepared by the applicant. Staff reviews and approves all applicant -prepared materials. j 11 intersections at Grade 1,000 900 -- 800 f0 0 ~ 700 600 500 400 i11 Chapter1310 KEY: Below curve, J� storage not f� needed for capacity. Above curve, further analysis recommended. 2 1 1 40 mAh !af 2 1 50 M rz1 60 Mph [�1 0 5 10 15 20 25 % Total DHV Turning Left (single turning movement) Notes: [1] DHV is total volume from both directions. [2] Speeds are posted speeds. Page 1310-26 Left -Turn Storage Guidelines: Two -Lane, Unsignalized Exhibit 1310-15a U N O w to H a� m � O xcll W � 00 Z cs �; � `ndL1HF-� C-4 Cq WSDOT Design Manual M 22-01.07 July 2010 . CITY Federal Way PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 33325 8 h Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003-6325 253-835-2700; Fax 253-835-2709 www.cil3Loffederalway.coni 2012 TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICATION NO(s) Project Name Property Address/Location Parcel Number(s) Project Description PROPERTY OWNER Type of Development permit to be applied for: ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily (MF) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Single Family (SF) ❑ None (Feasibility only) ❑ Other Date ❑ Short Subdivision Approval for City to perform Concurrency analysis: ❑ Yes ❑ No If NO: Applicant's Traffic Engineer must perform Concurrency analysis consistent with City procedures; however, the application fee remains the same. LADEPT\PW\TRA\Concurcency\CN TemplateTinal Template\FW Concumncy Application Rev. Jan2012.doc 1 �I J Required Information — Application is incomplete and will be returned if not filled out. Gross Square Feet (Commercial) Existing Proposed Number of Dwelling Units Existing Proposed Number of Employees Existing Proposed Parcel size (acres or square footage) Existing Proposed Has the property previously been reviewed for concurrency? Yes No If yes, date of original application Concurrency Permit No: Is this an amendment to an existing Concurrency Certificate? Yes Nn Will the project be phased? Development Build -Out Year Note: - Commercial subdivisions and other projects constructed in phases shall be evaluated for concurrency as each phase is submitted for applicable development permits. - Once the concurrency test result has been determined, any changes to the development project require additional review will be billed on an hourly basis. Estimated Number of New Trip Generated by Project per Pre -application Summary: If the applicant's engineer has prepared a trip generation analysis, please provide the following. If not, staff will calculate the trip generation based on the above information. Existing PM Peak Hour Trips (if applicable) Proposed PM Peak Hour Trips Net New PM Peak Hour Trips CONCURRENCY TEST EXPIRATION (FWRC 19.90) • A Concurrency Reserve Certificate (CRC) is valid until the underlying development permit expires, is withdrawn or cancelled, whichever occurs first. In that case, a new concurrency application would be required. • A Concurrency Reserve Certificate is valid only for the specific development approval consistent with the development parameters and City file number within the CRC issued. • A Concurrency Reserve Certificate (CRC) runs with the land, and cannot be transferred to a different parcel. I have read the above information regarding expiration deadlines. I further understand that issuance of a concurrency certificate is not a guarantee that the City will issue a development permit or building permit. Property Owner/Agent Signature Date ISL BMITTA1. REQUIRE JMENTS —STAFF USE ON], I' I Permit Submittal: The following items are required for all applications: ❑ Completed and signed Concurrency Application ❑ Concurrency Application Fee paid (See Below) Net New PM Peale Hour Trip Less than 10 10 - 50 51 - 500 Greater than 500•F 2012 Application Fee $344.50 $1,584.50 $3,374.50 $5,576.50 I LADEPT\PW\TRA\Concunnency\CN Template\Final TernplateTW Concurency Application Rev. Ian2012doc e.