06-102457FILE
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Mailing Address: PO Box 9718
Way Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
(253) 835-7000
www.cityoffederalway.com
URITMQM11
Mr. Mike Bally
LDG Architects
1319 Dexter Avenue West, Suite 245
Seattle, WA 98109
Ila.- File #06-102457-00-PC, PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
Hong Retail Center, 35415 21" Avenue SW, Federal Way, WA
Dear 1\4r. Bally:
Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development
IK.eview Committee (DRC) held June 8, 2006. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting wzw
helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted.
The key contact for your project is Janet Shull, 206-244-3749, janetshulldesign@comcast.net. For
specific technical questions about your project, please contact the appropriate DRC representative as
listei)wl** V&ei-;6se, z-Ay gener2l,•Yestieljms zV+vt tke )rez%iXixg)Fr+cess cax re
referred to your key contact.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Proposal to construct a 14,200 square -foot retail building, 1,800 square -foot drive through restaurant, ani
500 square -foot drive through espresso stand including 86 parking stalls and site improvements.
MAJOR ISSUES
Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and inforination
submitted for preapplication review. These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in e
�21ans. These major issues oQ rwresent comments that the DRC consider most sij;ificant to jour iroject
ane ao not incivae Tne maj ori ry 37 me commems proM—de= ne major i-MIRMIT
means to highlight critical requirements or issues. Please be sure to read the entire department comments
made in the next section of this letter.
Mr. Baily
June 21, 2006
Page 2
Public Works Traffic Division
Traffic Impact Analysis is required as well as frontage improvements with right-of-way dedication.
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the
p . reapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions, please contact
the representative listed for that section.
i'l!l1• NIPPON NINE: I I I - , I
1. Zoning, Use and Review Process — The zoning of the subject site is Neighborhood Business (BN).
The BN zoning district permits retail uses under FWCC Section 22-721 and fast food restaurant uses
under FWCC Section 22-722 (enclosed). The required review process for the project is Process III
Project Approval, (when SEPA review is also, required). Under Process III, the Director of
Community Development makes a written decision on the application based on criteria listed under
E3YCC Secioly- 4.
2. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). — Construction of new buildings greater than 4,000 square
feet, and development of more than 20 parking stalls are subject to SEPA review. An environmental
checklist must be submitted and reviewed prior to the City issuing an environmental threshold
determination. The notification includes a 14-day comment period and a 14-day appeal period.
SEPA review must be concluded before the site plan approval and any other applicable land use
review may be granted.
3. Fees — The proposal to develop the project requires the following fees: Process III review $2,129.00
and SEPA environmental determination review as part of the project $843.50. If a Boun dary Line
Adjustment is required, the associated fee is $1,249.50.
4. Land Use Review Time Frames; Limitations —
Time Frames — Under FWCC procedural guidelines, every effort �,is made to process land use
applications within 120 days from the date of a complete application; and to approve, disapprove,
return the application within this timeline. The review time frame is suspended at any time that thel
City requests additional information from the applicant. Throughout project review, the applicant
will be notified in writing of the status of the 120-day time clock. The applicant may also request
and pay for supplemental review.'
Limitations — In accordance with code requirements, the applicant must begin •construction or submit
a complete building permit application within one year of the Process III decision, or the decision is
void. In addition, the applicant must substantially complete construction for the actions approved
under the Process III decision within five years after the final decision on the matter. Provisions for
2
certain extensions of these tinieframes are set forth in code.
1 See the information bulletin, Supplemental Review Process.
2 FWCC Section 22-408, -409, "Time Extension"
06-102457 Doc. 1,D. 36612
Mr. Baily
June 21, 2006
Page 3
5. Submittal Requirements —
Land Use and Environmental Review — Refer to the enclosed Development Requirements checklist.
The submitted site plan must depict all proposed structures and physical improvements, including
trash and recycling facilities, loading and storage areas, storm drainage facilities, parking lot light
fixtures, sidewalks, crosswalks, retaining walls, rockeries or fences, and ground -mounted
mechanical equipment; with accompanying elevations as noted.
You will note from the Process III checklist that the applicant is responsible for providing mailing
envelopes for code -required public notice. Public notice will be issued for the notice of complete
application and the environmental threshold determination. Notice of application is required to be
i"fffi?l]yz,,WiJ r #Aaf 1 IN atei 0 16 et of owners of property located within 300 feet of all site boundaries. Accordingly, the applicant must
include two sets of stamped mailing envelopes, prepared in accordance with the City's written
procedures?
6. Setbacks and Lot Coverage — Minimum front yard setback requirements for a retail or fast food
restaurant development in the BN zone is 0 feet. The minimum side and rear yard requirements are
10 feet for the proposed project. Refer to FWCC Section 22-721 and Section 22-722. However, for
the proposed development, the minimum front yard setback (along the 2 l't Avenue SW ROW) is
five feet as dictated by minimum perimeter landscape requirements. The minimum setback on the
western and northern property lines is 20 feet as dictated by the setback requirement from
residentially zoned areas. There is no maximum lot coverage established. Instead, the buildable area
will be dtterinined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot
landscApm& �surf4c:e water facilities,
7. Building Height — The height of the building allowed by the FWCC is 3 5 feet above average
building elevation. However, note 3 of FWCC Sections 22-721 and 22-722 states that building
height is limited to 30 feet for any portion of a structure within 100 feet of a residential zone.
Elevations submitted with this pmapplication indicate a maximum building height of 30 feet.
Parking Requirements — Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-72 1, the parking requirement for a retail
development is one stall for every 300 square feet of gross floor area. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-
722, the parking requirement for a fast food restaurant is one stall for every 80 square feet of gross
floor area. The proposed 14,200 square -foot retail building, 1,800 square -foot fast food restaurant,
and 500 square -foot drive through espresso stand would thus be required to provide a total of 76
Narking stalls. The rlans submitted with this i pplication indicate that 86 stalls are to be grovided.
;e
.ftowever, it snouici De RPM MY 1! any oi TITC Lt;nanL SpilUUN Ill •roposeu retail 0 Lllltlll�; 'IT Cl C UP F*
occupied by a restaurant tenant, there may not be adequate parking available on site. It is
recommended that the applicant consider a parking scenario where one or more tenants of the retail
building are restaurant use and provide additional parking, if possible, to allow for increased
flexibility in leasing tenant spaces. Up to 25 percent of parking stalls may be compact. A parking
stall/drive aisle chart is enclosed. If parking is located on a lot other than the lot containing the use
which generates the parking space requirements, the owner of the lot containing the parking must
3 See the City handout titled Obtaining Mailing Labels. Note that a separate paper list of addresses is required to accompany each
set of envelopes.
4 FWCC 22-721, note 7 and FWCC 22-722, note 7.
06-102457
Doc, IR. 36612
I or-Ro RLIM Kill a I I I Ri UtRIJ a I IN ONO I UIRBUIV 14; like a em oil I Ig* to) a I$ to-IlI OWN
0,'. Landscaping — A preliminary landscape plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect in
accordance with FWCC Chapter 22, Article XVII, "Landscapin& " is required as part of the Process
HI submittal. The landscape plan must depict the following landscape infonnation:
a. Perimeter Landscaping — A five -foot -wide strip of Type 111 landscaping must be provided
along the east and • perimeter lot lines • to FWCC Section 22-1566(e)(I)and
15-foot-wide strip of Type I landscaping must be provided along the west and • •
lot lines pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1566(e)(2).
b. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping — Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-15 67(b)(1)(a), commercial
developments with 50 • • parking stalls shall provide 22 square feet of landscaping per
parking stall. Please be aware that pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1567(c), landscape islands
shall be a minimum size of 64 square feet and a maximum of 305 square feet. The minimum
width of a landscape island at the end of a 90-degree parking row is six feet. The submitted
landscape plan must show the square footage and dimensions of each landscape island and mu
depict required trees, shrubs, and groundcover.
c, Parking Area Screening — Parking areas adjacent to public right-of-way must be screened fron
the right-of-way with either: a tbree-foot-tall benri installed within the perimeter landscapffig;
architectural features; or substantial plantings added to the perimeter landscaping in accordanc
with FWCC Section 1567(e)(1). The parking stalls along the east property line must be
screened from 2 1 " Avenue SW.
d. Plant Species — Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1564(f), at least 25 percent of new landscaping
materials (i.e., plants, trees, and groundcover) shall consist of drought -tolerant species. This
calculation must be shown on the landscape plan.
e. Screening ofBlank Walls & Foundation Landscaping — Building walls that are uninterrupted
by windows, doors, •' • architectural features; that are 240 •' feet in area • greater;
and are not located on a property line, must be screened by landscaping including trees, shrubs
and groundcovers appropriate for the area per FWCC 22-1564(u). Foundation landscaping is
also encouraged.
f. Trash Enclosures — Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1564(d), all trash enclosures shall be
screened from abutting properties and/or public rights -of -way by a 100 percent sight-obscurin�
fence or wall and appropriate landscape screen.
g. Modifications — FWCC Section 22-1570 outlines the landscape modification options and
criteria. Please refer to this section for specific information.
M Community Design /• — The proposed retail building, fast food restaurant, and • through
espresso buildings must comply with applicable portions • FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIX,
"Community Design Guidelines". In addition, the proposal must meet applicable provisions of Crime
Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) as adopted by the City. A completed CPTED
checklist shall be submitted with the Process IH application.
For desil r11eAv,,J C=T -t-6111 17 F
1 11
5 Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(b)(2)
06-102457 Doc. I.D. 36612
Mr. Baily
June 21, 2006
Page 5
Building elevations shall also depict wall -mounted light fixtures and any wall -mounted • ground -
mounted mechanical equipment. Details shall be provided in plan view along with specifications for
benches, planters, pedestrian -scale lighting, trash receptacles/ashtrays, and • racks as
appropriate. The application shall also include a statement of design intent, including a narrative
description •: • the proposal meets the applicable • Additional information may •`
requested if necessary to make a design determination. This correspondence highlights the primary
applicable design guidelines for the proposed development, but does not necessarily identify all
applicable design requirements. 'Me following guidelines must be addressed for each of the proposed
new buildings.
Fagade Modulation — Under FWCC Section 22-1635(b)(3), those building facades that are both
at least two of the following four options for modulation and/or screening the wall: 1) fagade
modulation, 2) eight -foot -wide Type H landscape screening, 3) canopy or arcade, or 4) pedestrian
•'
For the retail building, this requirement is applied to all facades. The submitted site plan and
elevations show modulation breaks for all facades and canopy treatment for the east,fagade, but no
other modulation options. From the submitted elevations, it appears, that at least one additional
ades. For the fast food
restaurant, the modulation requirement is applied to the north and south facades. The submitted site
plan does not indicate any fagade modulation treatment for these facades.
Additionally, articulation of blank walls over-240 square feet on all sides of each building is required
as outlined in FWCC S I ection 22-163 5 (c). The blank portions • all proposed building facades must
receive this treatment.
Pedestrian Circulation — The district guidelines identified in FWCC Section 22-1634(d) must be
addressed in the site plan and architectural elevations. The location and configuration of pedestrian
lan-
site plan must reflect good pedestrian access to all main parking areas, exterior sidew s, an
QG@
and off -site bus stops. Based on the current site plan, an additional pedestrian linkage must be
provided through the site to the adjacent commercial site to the south. Please see redlined site plan
(enclosed) for suggested location of pedestrian connection. In addition, itappears that vehicular
access between the subject site and site to the • feasible. Please explore this •r1r with
the applicant for the proposed development to the south. The applicant contact for the adjacent
project to the south "Northshore Village" is Mr. David Hoek; da� gpkjg�; 206-679- —
5 66 1. In addition, the City of Federal Way planner reviewing the proposed "Northshore Village"
project is Mr. Andy Bergsagel; andy. ty 253-835-2644. 1 have
(trovided Mr. Bergsagel with a copy of your preliminary site plan.
texture, and contrasting color. Paint striping as a method of delineation is not approved.
06-102457 Doe, I.D. 36612
Mr. Baily
June 21, 2006
Page 6
intent of this requirement. However, the proposed fast food restaurant entrance does not meet this
re _'?Y_irement_Vkl;1 •
facing 2 1 " Avenue SW.
Drive through facilities shall be visually screened and separated from streets, parking lots, and
pedestrian circulation areas by Type Ell landscaping and/or architectural elements, or some
combination rt1P.-d-eW �FJ'X%_UY fUiliiZb-Z'lf ?Prlf)V49--a7FT41�&k
screening. The proposed screening of the drive aisles meets the intent of this requirement. A
bypass/escape lane for Building C is recommended.
11. Garbage and Recycling — FWCC 22-949 (enclosed) requires solid waste and recycling storage areas
to be included in all new commercial development. FWCC Sections 22-949 and 22-1564(d) provide
standards for design, placement, sizing, and screening of garbage receptacles, dumpsters, and storage
areas. The receptacles may not be located in required yards and must be screened with landscaping
per FWCC Sections 22-1561.
12. Rooftop.4ppurtenances — FWCC Section 22-960 and 22-1407 (enclosed) provide standards for
screening of rooftop appurtenances. The site plan submittal should contain a statement of proposed
rooftop elements, and they should be depicted on the elevation drawings.
13. Light Standards — A lighting plan depicting the location of fixtures must be submitted. Lightin;§
fixtures may not take the place of required landscaping.
14. Signs — FWCC Chapter 22, Article XVIII regulates signage on the site. In general, one monument or
pedestal free-standingsign is permitted in addition to wall -mounted signs. A sign permit is required
before any signage is installed. Sign permit information is enclosed.
TJ=51 rt
ann.dower@cityoffederalway.com)
Land Use Issues — Stormwater
1 Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the 1998 King County
Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWI)M) and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the 1998
KCSWDM. This project meets the requirements for a Full Drainage Review. At the time of land use
site plan submittal, a preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR), addressing the relevance of
the project to the eight core and five special requirements of the KCSWDM will be required. A
Level I downstream analysis shall also be provided in the preliminary TIR. The City has I 100',
five-foot contour planimetric maps that may be used for basin analysis.
2. The project lies within a Level 1 flow control area, thus the applicant must design the flow control
facility to meet this performance criteria. The project also lies within a Resource Stream Protection
Water Quality Area. Water Quality Treatment shall be designed to meet the treatment criteria of thi�
Resource Stream Protection Menu.
3. In lieu of providing onsite detention, the applicant may elect to convey stormwater to Panther Lake
Regional Detention Facility. The pro-rata share contribution amount is $1728 per acre, which is
06-102457 Doc, 11). 36672
Mr. Baily
June 21, 2006
Page 7
- 1 0) 01Qb1ifflM 61-7) KIA 1411 NIVY fill sm, Mi -
Y
conveyance system will be the responsibility of the applicant. Water quality treatment must be
[•rovided onsite prior to discharge.
4. If infiltration is proposed, soil logs prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer or septic designer
must be provided to verify infiltration suitability.
5. Detention and water quality facilities for commercial developments outside the City Center Core
must be above ground (i.e. open pond). Underground facilities are allowed only with approval from
the City of Federal Way Stormwater Management Division.
6. Show the proposed location and dimensions of the detention and water quality facilities on the
preliminary plans.
Right -of -Way Improvements
I See the Traffic Division comments from Maryanne Zukowski, Senior Traffic Engineer, for traffic
related items.
2. If dedication of additional right-of-way is required to install street frontage improvements, . e
dedication shall be conveyed to the City through a statutory warranty deed. The dedicated area must
have clear title prior to recording.
3. All stormwater treatment and detention requirements outlined above will be applied to new
impervious area within the public right-of-way.
4. FWCC Section 16-47 requires that overhead utility lines be relocated underground if over 500 feet,
or three spans are affected by a project. This condition will be applied to 2 l't Avenue SW.
Building (or EN) Permit Issues
Engineered plans are required for clearing, grading, road construction, and utility work. Plans must
be reviewed and approved by the City. Engineering review fees are $730.00 for the first 12 hours of
review, and $61 per hour for additional review time. A final TIR shall be prepared for the project
erio &W11111 rejuire the sienature/seal
and the ilans al
M . i ilans. Both the TIR
104 Wililii -
i U-14 yJ I L" 1147-0 8 118 11 ti-MQ ra I OR 53 WMV NJ 0 110 1
1 The Federal Way Development Standards Manual (including standard detail drawings, standard
notes, and engineering checklists) is available on the City's website atj����� to
assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and TIR.
roadi�ays.
4. Bonding is required for all improvements associated with the project. The bond amount shall be 120
percent of the estimated costs of the improvements. An administrative fee deposit will need to
accompany the bond to cover any possible legal fees in the event the bond must be called. Upon
06-102457 Doc. ID, 36612
MT. Baily
June 21, 2006
Page 8
completion of the installation of the improvements, and final approval of the Public Works
f.ector. the b IT-WIV •-z-4
maintenance periort.
detention and water quality facilities) and street systems during the two-year maintenance period.
During that time, the Public Works Inspector will make periodic visits to the site to ensure the
developer's compliance with the maintenance requirements. Upon satisfactory completion of the
two-year maintenance period, the remainder of the bond will be released. Maintenance for pub•lic
roads and subdivision drainaie facilities then become the resionsibilitv of the Ci6. Mainimice fjo
I FUL6 U1111- ILI d6c IdURMOS, InIOUIUMg bROIL PlilLS, ICHIU111 LIM I-OSpunsiouiLy oi ine inuiviuuai
property owners.
6. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans, the vertical datum block shall include
the phrase "DATUM: N.G.V.D.-29" or "DATUM: K.C.A.S.," on all sheets where vertical elevations
are called out.
7. Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24 x 36 or 22 x 34" paper. All final
approved drawings shall be drafted/plotted on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" mylar sheet with permanent
black ink. Site plans shall be drawn at a scale of 1 20', or larger. Architectural scales are not
permitted on engineering plans.
8. Provide cut and fill quantities on the clearing and grading plan. Erosion control measures, per
Appendix D, 1998 KCSVVTM, must be shown on the.engineering plans.
The site plan shall show the location of any existing and proposed utilities in the areas affected by
construction.
I I I
I �
I I rt O 1AT,1 011 EWAI I �'11[11113M WMY 111I
I . Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation e Edition Code 82 the Project
is expected to generate more than 10 PM peak hour trips and 100 daily trips:
A traffic impact analysis (TIA) prepared by a traffic engineer is required to assess project impacts
and determine mitigation measures. The TIA study shall also include the following analysis:
El Sight Distance per AASHTO for all accesses
El Queuing El Sight circulation
El Neighborhood Impacts
F-1 Safety
2. Per FWCC Section 22-1474, the applicant/owner would be expected to construct half -street
improvements consistent with the planned roadway cross -sections as shown in Map 111-6 of the
FWCP and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) shown as TableIII-19. Based on the materials
submitted, staff conducted a limited analysis to determine the required frontage improvements in
meeting Federal Way City Code (FWCC). Based on the analysis and FWCC, the applicant would be
expected to construct half -street improvements on the following streets:
06-102457 Doe, LD_ 36612
Mr. Baily
June 21, 2006
Page 9
i7) 21" Avenue SW is a Type I street, consisting of a 58-foot street with curb, gutter, six-foot
planter strip with trees, eight -foot sidewalk, and street lights in a 92-foot right-of-way. The
improvements shall be from street centerline. Assuming a symmetrical cross section, an
additional 16 feet of right-of-way (ROW) will bereqyircd to be deeded. Please note that
additional right-of-way may be required as determined fbr the current cross sections on 2l't
Avenue SW to match other improvements.
Tapers and transitions beyond the project frontage may be required as deemed necessary for
safety purposes, taper rate shall be based on WSDOT Design Manual; WS/12/60 or AASHTO
as directed by the Public Works Director.
3. ROW dedication shall be conveyed to the City through a Statutory Warranty Deed and must have
clear title prior to recording.
C The applicant may make a written request to the Director of Public Works to modify, defer, or waive
the requirements improvements.
5. FWCC Section 20-15 1 (d) and FWCP Policy TP2 1, require block perimeters no longer than 1320
feet for non -motorized trips, and 2640 feet for streets. Therefore, an east/west pedestrian path
connection along the north side of the property would be required. Please have the engineer
investigate this feasibility.
I•Iease see enclosed comments.
I—AAKe ft TE IT- ITIEL Iff—T-i 79Ti7TUT-(WT=
Mease see enclosed comments.
TaVU I �111 -1 %L1
F91ease see enclosed comments.
CLOSING
[!,reparing plans and materials for formal application. We hope you found the comments useful to your
project. We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the City's
e content of this letter
does not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per
FWCC Section 22-1657.
As you know, this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will
follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication
fulaterials submitted.
please examine the complete FWCC and other relevant codes carefully. Requirements that are found in
the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project.
06-102457 Doc. I.D. 36612
If you have questions about an individual coninient, please contact the appropriate department
representative noted above. Anygeneral squestions can be directed v
Shull, 206-244-3749. We look forward to working with you.
wo=— PA
Janet Shull, AICP
Contract PlaTrer-
enc: Meeting Sign in Sheet
Building Division Comments
Lakehaven Utility District Comments
South King Fire and Rescue Comments
Master Land Use Application
Process III Development Checklist
FWCC Section 22-721 Retail in B]Vzoning district
FWCC Section 22-722 Fast Food Restaurant in BNzoning district
SEPA checklist
Mailing Label Handout
Expedited Review Handout
Parking stall design chart
FWCC Article XVII — Landscaping
FWCC Article XIX — Design Guidelines
CPTED checklist
FWCC Section 22-949, Garbage and Recycling
FWCC Section 22-960 and FWCC Section 22-1047 Rooftop appurtenances
FWCC Article XVIII - Signs
c; Scoff Sproul, Assistant Building Official
Ann Dower, Engineering Plans Reviewer
Maryanne Zukowski, Senior Traffic Engineer
Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District
Chris Ingham, South King Fire and Rescue
Andy Bergsagel, Associate Planner
06-102457 Doc- 1.1), 36612
t r J' // 1 / iConferenceSign InSheet
Name With Telephone Number
� o
z.
1
G
6. liar
7.
v
CITY O
-4�k Federal Way
May 23, 2006
Mike Baily
1319 Dexter Avenue North #245
Seattle, WA 98109
RE: File 06=102457-00- C; NOTICE of PREAPPLTCATION MEETING
Hong 'Retail, 35415 21'5t Avenue SW
Dear Mr. aily:
The above-refereziced proposal has been assigned to e as project planner. At this time, the application has
been routed to the members of the Development Review Committee. A meeting with the project applicant
and Development Review Committee has been scheduled as follows:
10:00 AM, Thursday,, June 8, 2006
Hylebos Conference Room
City Hall, 2na Floor
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
e look forward to meeting with you. Let me know if you will have more than five people attending the
preapplication meeting so we can make arrangements for a larger room. This is the only notice sent out, so
please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend the meeting. Please call me at 206-
244-3749 or email me at janetshulldesign@comcast.het if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
J net Shull, AICP
. -, ontract Planner
06-102457 Doc, I. D. 36499
41k MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION
DEPARTMENT OF CommuNiTy DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33325 8h Avenue South
CITY OF RECEIVED PO Box 9718
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
Federal Way mAY, 1 7 2006 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
wow .ci!yoffederalwgy.coru
FEDEPALWAY
T.
APPLICATION No(s) Date
A -A C_
Project Name
Property Address/Location
Parcel Number(s)
Type of Permit Required
Annexation
Binding Site Plan
Boundary Line Adjustment
Comp Plan/Rezone
Land Surface Modification
Lot Line Elimination
Preapplication Conference
Process I (Director=s Approval)
Process II (Site Plan Review)
Process III (Project Approval)
Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone)
Process VI
SEPA w/Project
SEPA Only
Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use
Short Subdivision
Subdivision
Variance: Commercial/Residential
Required Information
Zoning Designation
Value of Existing Improvements
?"it L— Value of Proposed Improvements
Occupancy Type
Construction Type
L --
Applicant
-
am :
Address: ilt>15
City/State:
Zip:
Phone: Zc;,Z�
Fax:
Email: CIE C—s—
Signature:
Agent (if different than Applicant)
Aame:
Address:
City/State:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Signature:
Name: L—L
Address: 'Z_e-(
City/State:
Zip:
Phone: -f--3+(
Fax:
Email:
Signature:
Bulletin #003 —August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application