Loading...
13-102512FILE CITY OF Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Progressive Insurance Claims Office File #13-102512-SE Proposal: Construction of a new 17,105 square -foot office building and surface parking to accommodate 115 vehicles. Additional site improvements include stormwater treatment and conveyance, road and utility construction, and landscaping. The applicant has prepared buffer enhancement mitigation for temporary and permanent wetland buffer encroachments for sewer connection and stormwater conveyance. Applicant: Eric Labrie, ESM Consulting Engineers, 33400 8`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Project Location: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, WA 98003, APN 202104-9051 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way - Community and Economic Development Department Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, AICP - Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.31C.060. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS pLocess in WAC 197-11-355. No written comments were received in response to the 14-da comment period that ended July 15 2013. There is no further comment period on the DNS. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk, no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 30, 2013, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination and associated fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Address: Date Issued: 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Doc I D 64359 -) FILE CITY of CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Ak Federal Way Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com ESM Consulting Engineers LLC October 16, 2013 Eric Labrie 33400 811' Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 9.8003 RE: File #13-102512-00-SE; ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Progressive Claims Office, 34001 Pacific Hwy S, Federal Way Dear Mr. Labrie: The city and jurisdictional agencies have reviewed the environmental checklist submitted with the Progressive Claims Office Master Land Use (MLU) application. It has been determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of the Detennination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is enclosed. The Optional DNS Process was used to review this proposal. The 14-day comment period required by SEPA Rules began on June 28, 2013, and ended July 15, 2013. The city did not receive written comments regarding the environmental checklist. Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-355, a second comment period is not required upon issuance of the DNS. The enclosed DNS was issued on October 16, 2013. The city will provide a copy of the DNS to the Department of Ecology, agencies with jurisdiction, Puyallup and Muckleshoot tribes, and anyone requesting a copy. All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days following the issuance of the DNS. No licenses, permits, or approvals will .be issued until completion of the appeal period, which ends October 30, 2013. The decision not to require an EIS does not grant the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the city. The environmental record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions may be imposed to reduce identified environmental impacts, as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated city policy. After a final decision has been made on your proposal you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as pennitted in RCW 43.21C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. The city is not responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. Questions regarding the environmental review component should be directed to me at 253-835-2638 or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely a ew Herrera, TCl' Associate Planner enc: DNS Doc I.D. 64360 CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www. c i t yof fecdero I way, c orn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significar-ce (DS) and Scoping Notice Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed '19(e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on ) 2013. Project Name _ �f'd rP_S Sy -=ns'- I_ File Number(s) F Signature 'a- Date ) G , 16 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distdbution.doc/Last printed II]OM13 11:39:00 AM DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov LAURA MURPHY TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 ]aura. m u rgh v(d,) m uckieshoot. nsn. us LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 basbury@lakehaven.org BRANDON REYNON PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 brandon.re non u allu tribe_com SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1 IT AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 chris.in ham southkingfire.or gordon.goodsell@southkingfire.org RAMON PAZOOKI WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 330310 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov Doc. I.D. Tamara Fix From: Tamara Fix Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:08 PM To: 'ECY RE SEPA UNIT'; 'basbury@lakehaven.org'; Chris Ingham; Gordon Goodsell; 'laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com'; 'ramin. pazooki@wsdot.wa. gov' Subject: Progressive Insurance DNS Attachments: Progressive DNS Pkt.pdf Attached is the DNS and revised SEPA checklist for the Progressive Insurance project. This is being issued on October 16, 2013, and the Associate Planner for the project is Matt Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityofFederalway.com. CITY OF Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Progressive Insurance Claims Office File 413-102512-SE Proposal: Construction of a new 17,105 square -foot office building and surface parking to accommodate 115 vehicles. Additional site improvements include stormwater treatment and conveyance, road and utility construction, and landscaping. The applicant has prepared buffer enhancement mitigation for temporary and permanent wetland buffer encroachments for sewer connection and stormwater conveyance. Applicant: Eric Labrie, ESM Consulting Engineers, 33400 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Project Location: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, WA 98003, APN 202104-9051 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way - Community and Economic Development Department Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, AICP - Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.31C.060. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. No written comments were received in response to the 14-day comment Reriod that ended July 15 2013. There is no further comment period on the DNS. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk, no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 30, 2013, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination and associated fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Address: 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Issued: Doc. I D 64359 41k CITY OF Federal Way �Zvrs_eol 0,—d A'" <��# fo/15-& DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8'h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoNderalwsi coin ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the envirommental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your oven observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to detennining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions. For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. SEP 2 5 2013 W AY Page I of 13 CDS A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Center 2. Name of applicant: Zaremba Group LLC — Attn: Sean McDermott 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Name: Zaremba Group, LLC Attn: Sean McDermott Address: 14600 Detroit Ave City/State: Lakewood, OH Zip: 44107 Phone: (216) 838-6113 x163 Fax: N/A Email: srncdermott�7a zarembs rou .cam 4. Date checklist prepared: June 3, 2013 REVISED: September 20, 2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): It is anticipated that the Process IH/IV, SEPA review, constructions approvals, and other permitting procedures will take approximately 6 to 8 months. All on -site and off -site improvements will be constructed in a single phase. The target start time for construction to begin will be during the spring of 2014. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to this proposal. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Engineering Report by AESI, Inc dated May 16, 2013 Traffic Analysis by Transpo Group dated May 16, 2013 Critical Area Study by Wetland Resources, Inc dated May 20, 2013 Preliminary Technical Information Report by ESM Consulting Engineers dated May 20, 2013 Page 2 of 13 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. The Federal Way Village project lies directly north of this site and may coordinate with this proposal regarding the extension of South 340th. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Process IV Project Approval Traffic Concurrency Review SEPA Approval WSDOT Access Permit Signal Modification Clearing and Grading Road and Storm Drainage Approval Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is for a new Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office that will be primarily used for office space. The property is a long rectangular 8.27 acres in the Commercial Enterprise (CE) Zone. The building and parking will be situated on the eastern half of the property while the western half will be protected and retained as a wedandlregional storm detention facility. The office building will be a single story 17,105 SF office for approximately 74 employees and will have 115 parking stalls provided on -site. Primary access will be from Pacific Highway South via an extension of a road (S 340'h St) at the intersection of Pacific Highway and 16`h Ave S. Sewer will be collected and released into an existing sewer line that runs north and south through the center of the property. Stormwater will be collected and released to the existing Fitts Corner Regional Storm facility on the western portion of the property. Both the sewer line and the storm lines will encroach into the wetland buffers and will require some mitigation. In addition the project will require the extension of a water main that may exceed 8" in size. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of Your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject property is located in the City of Federal Way in south King County. It can be found on the NE % of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East W.M. The site is on the west side of Pacific Highway South at the intersection with 16" Avenue South. It has approximately 300 linear feet of frontage along Pacific Highway. Please refer to the Assessors Map, Site Plans, and Vicinity Map on the site plans. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one : ilat) rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Page 3 of 13 The site is very flat in the area that work is proposed. However on the western half near the regional detention facility there are engineered slopes that were constructed as part of the regional stormwater detention facility and sewer main installation. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? According to the topographic survey, the steepest slope on the site is approximately 20% located near the central portion of the property between the regional detention facility and the proposed construction area. The area proposed for development, is relatively flat at 1%-5%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. on May 16, 2013, the site is predominantly loose to medium dense fill overlying an alluvial deposit consisting of loose/medium stiff sand, clayey silt, and silty clay, overlying dense to very dense advance washout sand and gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no indications of unstable soils on -site and no indicators on regional sensitive areas maps. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of proposed grading will be to accommodate the proposed building and associated parking. Filling or grading quantities will be prepared as part of the clearing and grading permit. However, it is anticipated that filling/grading will be minimal. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur on -site as a result of construction activities; however, temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures to be approved by the City of Federal Way will be employed during construction to reduce erosion impacts. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 12.5% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. During construction, the contractor will follow an approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan meeting City of Federal Way standards. Typical measures, which may be employed, include the use of silt fences, straw bales, and temporary storm drainage features. Hydroseeding exposed soils and cleared areas after construction will also reduce the potential for erosion. 2. AIR a. wil,ittypes.ofeniissions.to-the air would.resultfrom the.proposal(a.e.,dust, automobile,.odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Page 4 of 13 Construction: Some heavy machinery exhaust and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment will be produced during the construction phase of this project. The amount of emissions to the air will be minimal and will occur during the actual construction of the development. All equipment will be well maintained and have proper air quality treatment installed as required by the manufacturer. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to reduce dust. Long Term Air uali The primary use of the proposed building is for offices. As such, long-term air impacts would be those typically associated office space land uses. Sources of long-term emissions and odor could include vehicle emissions from increased vehicle use generated by the service center. The additional vehicular emissions in these areas are not anticipated to concentrate and therefore are not anticipated to create a health hazard to the surrounding areas. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No off -site sources of emission or odor will affect this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. As stated above all construction equipment will be in proper working order and regulated for emissions by the manufacturer and local emission laws. Vehicles entering and leaving the site will also be regulated for emissions by state and local emission laws. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to keep any dust from impacting surrounding air quality. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. According to the Critical Areas Study prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. and the Federal Way � g inventory, the site contains a wetland and stream complex constructed as part of the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility located an the western portion of the subject property. The wetland is kS 'r defined as a Category 11 Wetland and the stream is defined as a Major Stream pursuant to the Federal Way City Code. The stream is a tributary ofHylebos Creek. � -44 f 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes the proposal will require work within 200 feet of the above described wetlands. No work is proposed within the wetlands but the sanitary sewer connection and stormwater release point will require work within the wetland buffer. Please see the Critical Areas Study Map prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. for details regarding the impact to the wetland buffer. Stormwater will be collected and released to an existing storm detention facility to the west of this development. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from Page 5 of 13 surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No filling or dredging will take place in the wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Map (Floodplains) the site does not lie within a 100- year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No the proposal will not discharge waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn nor will water be discharged to ground water. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. No on -site septic or treatment is proposed. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. On -site storm water runoff will primarily be generated from building rooftops, parking areas and associated drive aisles. Storm water will be collected, routed through required storm water quality treatment facilities and discharged to an existing stormwater detention facility to the west. See the Preliminary Storm Drainage Report and Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers submitted as part of this Process IV Site Plan review application. Page 6 of 13 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials will enter ground or surface waters. The proposed site storm water drainage and sewer plans will ensure that all water that is generated from the site will be treated in water quality facilities prior to its release as required by City of Federal Way standards. Best Management Practices will be used throughout the construction of the proposal to ensure that no waste enters ground or surface waters without first being treated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. ?� I W W 014 The storm water runoff will be collected and conveyed to the existing detention facility in conformance with the City of Federal Way standards. Please see the Preliminary Storm Drainage Report and �,,,. y.�• Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. _X deciduous tre alder naple, aspe cottonwoa other X evergreen tree fi cedar pine, other _ shrubs X_ grass —Pasture _ crop or grain _X wet soil plan cattail tterc bulrus unk cabby other _ water plant: water lily, eelgrass, inilfail, other —X_ other types of vegetatio . co c roo b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site is currently undeveloped with minimal vegetation. The eastern and central portion of the site, which is proposed for development, is generally devoid of vegetation other than low -growing shrubs and grasses. The western portion of the property, which contains the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility has vegetation characteristic of wetland areas. The shrubs and grasses in the eastern and central portion of the property will be removed for construction of the building, vehicular driveways and parking areas. The vegetation in the regional detention facility easement area is not proposed for removal or alteration. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known endangered or threatened species on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Native landscaping will be installed along the perimeter of the development area and street frontages pursuant to City of Federal Way guidelines. The vegetation near and around the wetland and stream complex will remain undisturbed except for the 15 foot wide corridor for the proposed sewer connection and storm discharge point. See the Preliminary Landscape Plan prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers submitted as part of this Process 1V Site Plan review application. Page 7 of 13 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: hawk, heron, eagl on r other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. This entire region is known to be part of the Pacific Flyway. The Pacific Flyway includes Alaska and the Aleutian Islands and the Rocky Mountain and Pacific coast regions of Canada, the United States and Mexico, south to where it becomes blended with other flyways in Central and South America. However, the site is not known to be used by migratory fowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Installation of native landscaping will provide coverage and habitat for urban tolerant wildlife. In addition, the vegetation within the regional detention facility easement area will remain undisturbed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the needs of the project and natural gas will be made available for the purpose of heating and other needs associated with the service center building. No. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The service center building that will be constructed as a result of this project will meet or exceed the applicable commercial energy conservation consumption requirements in the City of Federal Way and the Uniform Building Code. Page 8 of 13 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. It is unlikely under normal working conditions that environmental health hazards would be encountered. All project -related construction will meet or exceed current local, state and federal laws. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. State regulations regarding safety and the handling of hazardous materials will be followed during the construction process. Equipment refueling areas would be located in areas where a spill could be quickly contained and where the risk of hazardous materials entering surface water is minimized. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? The primary noise source near the project site is from vehicular traffic on Pacific Highway South to the east. The traffic noise along this roadway is not project related or generated, and is not anticipated to greatly affect the proposed project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Construction would occur during permitted construction hours and always in compliance with the City of Federal Way noise regulations. Long-term impacts would be those associated with the increase in vehicular traffic from future employees and customers. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Construction activity will be limited to permitted construction hours and construction equipment will not be allowed to idle for continuous periods of time, which will help to mitigate the impacts of potential construction noise. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current uses of the site and adjacent properties are as follows: SITE: Vacant land and Regional Stormwater Detention Facility NORTH: Undeveloped Land and Regional Stormwater Detention Facility SOUTH: Offiee send lighTindit'strial EAST: Commercial and light industrial WEST: Light industrial Page 9 of 13 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No the site has not been used for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no existing structures on -site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial Enterprise (CE) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial Enterprise (CE) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally critical area? If so, specify. Yes, according to the Critical Area Study prepared by Wetland Resources and the Federal Way inventory, a Category II Wetland and Major Stream are located on site. However, these sensitive areas are located within the regional stormwater detention facility permanent easement area outside of the proposed development area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? It is anticipated that the proposed claims center will have approximately 74 employees. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The project will be developed in accordance with applicable City of Federal Way development and land use codes to ensure the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and _applicable 1evelopment Regulations, in effect. at thetime of a completeProccss I1I11Y_ al441090011,_ Page 10 of 13 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None proposed. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of the proposed building will be approximately 30 feet high. The principal exterior building material will be metal siding and brick. Please see elevations and materials sheets provided by the architect, Richard L. Bowen and Associates Inc. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Development of the site would result in a change to the visual character of the site for the nearest existing businesses and roadways from that of an undeveloped site to that of a service center. No views will be obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The site plan has been developed to provide a site design layout consistent with the development regulations in place for the CE zone. Proposed design and landscaping consistent with City of Federal Way's development regulations will help to reduce aesthetic impacts. Please refer to the Building Elevations and Design Intent submitted with this application. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed site development will not create any permanent glare to off -site sources. Light and glare produced from this project will be typical of an office building in a commercial development. Light and glare from the site would primarily be during business hours and consist of site lighting and vehicle headlights entering and leaving the property. Please refer to the Photometric Plan prepared by H.F. Lenz dated May 21, 2013. No. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Page 11 of 13 c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Providing the required setbacks of the proposed building from the property lines and installation of landscaping will help to alleviate some of the light and glare created by the new development from the adjacent properties and roadways. The proposed use is consistent with the land use regulations and compatible to the existing adjacent land uses. Please refer to the Photometric Plan prepared by H.F. Lenz dated May 21, 2013. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? No designated or informal recreation opportunities are in the immediate vicinity. No. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. No measures proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To the best of our knowledge, there are no landmarks or evidence of any significant historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural resources known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. If any such historic or cultural evidence was encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work would be halted in the area and a state -approved archaeologist/historian would be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project will obtain access from the proposed new road (South 340 Street) along the northern property boundary. The new road will align with the Pacific Highway South and le Avenue South intersection. Page 12 of 13 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes the site is served by public transit. There is a known bus stop at the intersection of Pacific Highway and 16" Ave S. Bus route 500 is known to stop here. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have 115 parking spaces and will be eliminating no parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, the proposed project will construct full width improvements for a new public right-of-way (South 340th Street) along the northern property boundary, plus frontage improvements and a signal modification along Pacific Highway South. No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Weekday PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed Progressive building were estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation (9te Edition, 2012). The Progressive office building is estimated to generate 4 inbound and 21 outbound trips during the weekday PM peak hour based on the average trip generation rate for the General Office land use (#710). These trips were distributed consistent with the Village at Federal Way development and added to the S 340th Street- 16th Avenue S / Pacific Highway S intersection 2016 background traffic volumes. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. The proposed measures to reduce transportation impacts include the design and construction of a new public right-of-way (South 340`h Street) along the northern property line. Traffic impact fees will also be paid to offset any impacts to surrounding roads. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will result in a slight increase in need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. This increase in demand will be offset by fees, levies, and taxes required to be }paid by the applicant as part of this development. Also the proposal has been designed in a manner that ► •ill provide adequate access for fire, medic, and police vehicles. Page 13 of 13 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electriefty natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other (please list) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sanitary Sewer: Lakehaven Utility District Water: Lakehaven Utility District Electricity: Puget Sound Energy Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Telephone: Century Link Communications Cable TV: Comcast Refuse Service: City of Federal Way C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. SIGNATURE: f Evan Mann, Project Planner DATE SUBMITTED: June 7 2013 RESUBMITTED: September 20. 2013 Page 14 of 13 CIT Federal Way 44k DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8'h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RIVEECEFi, 835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 E � ww\X,.ci1voffedera1way.coiii JUN 0 7 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before snaking decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infonnation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional infonnation that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional infonnation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions. For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Page 1 of 13 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Center 2. Name of applicant: Zaremba Group LLC — Attn: Sean McDermott 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Name: Zaremba Group, LLC Attn: Sean McDermott Address: 14600 Detroit Ave City/State: Lakewood, OH Zip: 44107 Phone: (216) 838-6113 x163 Fax: N/A Email: smcdermott ri arem6akxroup.eom 4. Date checklist prepared: June 3, 2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): It is anticipated that the Process III/IV, SEPA review, constructions approvals, and other permitting procedures will take approximately 6 to 8 months. All on -site and off -site improvements will be constructed in a single phase. The target start time for construction to begin will be during the spring of 2014. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to this proposal. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Engineering Report by AESI, Inc dated May 16, 2013 Traffic Analysis by Transpo Group dated May 16, 2013 Critical Area Study by Wetland Resources, Inc dated May 20, 2013 Preliminary Technical Information Report by ESM Consulting Engineers dated May 20, 2013 Page 2 of 13 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. The Federal Way Village project lies directly north of this site and may coordinate with this proposal regarding the extension of South 340th. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Process III Project Approval Process IV Project Approval Traffic Concurrency Review SEPA Approval WSDOT Access Permit Signal Modification Clearing and Grading Road and Storm Drainage Approval Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is for a new Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office that will be primarily used for office space. The property is a long rectangular 8.27 acres in the Commercial Enterprise (CE) Zone. The building and parking will be situated on the eastern half of the property while the western half will be protected and retained as a wetland/regional storm detention facility. The office building will be a single story 16,608 SF office for approximately 74 employees and will have 115 parking stalls provided on -site. Primary access will be from Pacific Highway South via an extension of a road (S 340th St) at the intersection of Pacific Highway and 161h Ave S. Sewer will be collected and released into an existing sewer line that runs north and south through the center of the property. Storm will be collected and released to an existing storm pond along the north -central portion of the property. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject property is located in the City of Federal Way in south King County. It can be found on the NE 1/ of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East W.M. The site is on the west side of Pacific Highway South at the intersection with 161h Avenue South. It has approximately 300 linear feet of frontage along Pacific Highway. Please refer to the Assessors Map, Site Plans, and Vicinity Map on the site plans. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one : flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. The site is very flat in the area that work is proposed. However on the western half near the regional Page 3 of 13 detention facility there are engineered slopes that were constructed as part of the regional stormwater detention facility and sewer main installation. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? According to the topographic survey, the steepest slope on the site is approximately 20% located near the central portion of the property between the regional detention facility and the proposed construction area. The area proposed for development, is relatively flat at 1%-5%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. on May 16, 2013, the site is predominantly loose to medium dense fill overlying an alluvial deposit consisting of loose/medium stiff sand, clayey silt, and silty clay, overlying dense to very dense advance washout sand and gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no indications of unstable soils on -site and no indicators on regional sensitive areas maps. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of proposed grading will be to accommodate the proposed building and associated parking. Filling or grading quantities will be prepared as part of the clearing and grading permit. However, it is anticipated that filling/grading will be minimal. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur on -site as a result of construction activities; however, temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures to be approved by the City of Federal Way will be employed during construction to reduce erosion impacts. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 12.5% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. During construction, the contractor will follow an approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan meeting City of Federal Way standards. Typical measures, which may be employed, include the use of silt fences, straw bales, and temporary storm drainage features. Hydroseeding exposed soils and cleared areas after construction will also reduce the potential for erosion. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Page 4 of 13 Construction: Some heavy machinery exhaust and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment will be produced during the construction phase of this project. The amount of emissions to the air will be minimal and will occur during the actual construction of the development. All equipment will be well maintained and have proper air quality treatment installed as required by the manufacturer. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to reduce dust. Linn 'fcrin Air ualih-: The primary use of the proposed building is for offices. As such, long-term air impacts would be those typically associated office space land uses. Sources of long-term emissions and odor could include vehicle emissions from increased vehicle use generated by the service center. The additional vehicular emissions in these areas are not anticipated to concentrate and therefore are not anticipated to create a health hazard to the surrounding areas. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No off -site sources of emission or odor will affect this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. As stated above all construction equipment will be in proper working order and regulated for emissions by the manufacturer and local emission laws. Vehicles entering and leaving the site will also be regulated for emissions by state and local emission laws. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to keep any dust from impacting surrounding air quality. 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. According to the Critical Areas Study prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. and the Federal Way inventory, the site contains a wetland and stream complex constructed as part of the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility located on the western portion of the subject property. The wetland is defined as a Category II Wetland and the stream is defined as a Major Stream pursuant to the Federal Way City Code. The stream is a tributary of Hylebos Creek. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes the proposal will require work within 200 feet of the above described wetlands. No work is proposed within the wetlands but the sanitary sewer connection will require work within the wetland buffer. Please see the Critical Areas Study Map prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. for details regarding the impact to the wetland buffer. Stormwater will be collected and released to an existing storm detention pond that is not in the 100 foot wetland buffer but is within 200 feet of the wetland. Please see site plans for details. Page 5 of 13 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No filling or dredging will take place in the wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Map (Floodplains) the site does not lie within a 100- year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No the proposal will not discharge waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn nor will water be discharged to ground water. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. No on -site septic or treatment is proposed. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. On -site storm water runoff will primarily be generated from building rooftops, parking areas and associated drive aisles. Storm water will be collected, routed through required storm water quality treatment facilities and discharged to an existing stormwater detention pond. This existing pond is located along the north property line about midway from east to west. See the Preliminary Storm Drainage Report and Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers submitted as part of this Process IIUIV Site Plan review application. Page 6 of 13 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials will enter ground or surface waters. The proposed site storm water drainage and sewer plans will ensure that all water that is generated from the site will be treated in water quality facilities prior to its release as required by City of Federal Way standards. Best Management Practices will be used throughout the construction of the proposal to ensure that no waste enters ground or surface waters without first being treated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. The storm water runoff will be collected and conveyed to the existing detention pond in conformance with the City of Federal Way standards. Please see the Preliminary Storm Drainage Report and Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. _X_ deciduous tre alder jnaple, aspe cottonwao other X_ evergreen tree #ii cedar pine, other _ shrubs _X_ grass pasture _ crop or grain _X wet soil plan cattail tterc bulrus unk cabba other water plant: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetatio . co a roo b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site is currently undeveloped with minimal vegetation. The eastern and central portion of the site, which is proposed for development, is generally devoid of vegetation other than low -growing shrubs and grasses. The western portion of the property, which contains the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility has vegetation characteristic of wetland areas. The shrubs and grasses in the eastern and central portion of the property will be removed for construction of the building, vehicular driveways and parking areas. The vegetation in the regional detention facility easement area is not proposed for removal or alteration. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known endangered or threatened species on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Native landscaping will be installed along the perimeter of the development area and street frontages pursuant to City of Federal Way guidelines. The vegetation near and around the wetland and stream complex will remain undisturbed except for the 15 foot wide corridor for the proposed sewer connection. See the Preliminary Landscape Plan prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers submitted as part of this Process III Site Plan review application. Page 7 of 13 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: hawk, heron, Baal on Ir other manimals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. This entire region is known to be part of the Pacific Flyway. The Pacific Flyway includes Alaska and the Aleutian Islands and the Rocky Mountain and Pacific coast regions of Canada, the United States and Mexico, south to where it becomes blended with other flyways in Central and South America. However, the site is not known to be used by migratory fowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Installation of native landscaping will provide coverage and habitat for urban tolerant wildlife. In addition, the vegetation within the regional detention facility easement area will remain undisturbed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the needs of the project and natural gas will be made available for the purpose of heating and other needs associated with the service center building. No. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The service center building that will be constructed as a result of this project will meet or exceed the applicable commercial energy conservation consumption requirements in the City of Federal Way and the Uniform Building Code. Page 8 of 13 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. It is unlikely under normal working conditions that environmental health hazards would be encountered. All project -related construction will meet or exceed current local, state and federal laws. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. State regulations regarding safety and the handling of hazardous materials will be followed during the construction process. Equipment refueling areas would be located in areas where a spill could be quickly contained and where the risk of hazardous materials entering surface water is minimized. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? The primary noise source near the project site is from vehicular traffic on Pacific Highway South to the east. The traffic noise along this roadway is not project related or generated, and is not anticipated to greatly affect the proposed project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Construction would occur during permitted construction hours and always in compliance with the City of Federal Way noise regulations. Long-term impacts would be those associated with the increase in vehicular traffic from future employees and customers. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Construction activity will be limited to permitted construction hours and construction equipment will not be allowed to idle for continuous periods of time, which will help to mitigate the impacts of potential construction noise. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current uses of the site and adjacent properties are as follows: SITE: Vacant land and Regional Stormwater Detention Facility NORTH: Undeveloped Land and Regional Stormwater Detention Facility SOUTH: Office and light industrial EAST: Commercial and light industrial WEST: Light industrial Page 9 of 13 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No the site has not been used for agriculture. c. Describe any'structures on the site. There are no existing structures on -site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial Enterprise (CE) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial Enterprise (CE) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally critical area? If so, specify. Yes, according to the Critical Area Study prepared by Wetland Resources and the Federal Way inventory, a Category II Wetland and Major Stream are located on site. However, these sensitive areas are located within the regional stormwater detention facility permanent easement area outside of the proposed development area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? It is anticipated that the proposed claims center will have approximately 74 employees. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The project will be developed in accordance with applicable City of Federal Way development and land use codes to ensure the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable Development Regulations in effect at the time of a complete Process IIIAV application. Page 10 of 13 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None proposed. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of the proposed building will be approximately 30 feet high. The principal exterior building material will be metal siding and brick. Please see elevations and materials sheets provided by the architect, Richard L. Bowen and Associates Inc. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Development of the site would result in a change to the visual character of the site for the nearest existing businesses and roadways from that of an undeveloped site to that of a service center. No views will be obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The site plan has been developed to provide a site design layout consistent with the development regulations in place for the CE zone. Proposed design and landscaping consistent with City of Federal Way's development regulations will help to reduce aesthetic impacts. Please refer to the Building Elevations and Design Intent submitted with this application. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed site development will not create any permanent glare to off -site sources. Light and glare produced from this project will be typical of an office building in a commercial development. Light and glare from the site would primarily be during business hours and consist of site lighting and vehicle headlights entering and leaving the property. Please refer to the Photometric Plan prepared by H.F. Lenz dated May 21, 2013. No. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Page 11 of 13 c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Providing the required setbacks of the proposed building from the property lines and installation of landscaping will help to alleviate some of the light and glare created by the new development from the adjacent properties and roadways. The proposed use is consistent with the land use regulations and compatible to the existing adjacent land uses. Please refer to the Photometric Plan prepared by H.F. Lenz dated May 21, 2013. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? No designated or informal recreation opportunities are in the immediate vicinity. No. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. No measures proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To the best of our knowledge, there are no landmarks or evidence of any significant historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural resources known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. If any such historic or cultural evidence was encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work would be halted in the area and a state -approved archaeologist/historian would be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project will obtain access from the proposed new road (South 340`h Street) along the northern property boundary. The new road will align with the Pacific Highway South and 161hAvenue South intersection. Page 12 of 13 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes the site is served by public transit. There is a known bus stop at the intersection of Pacific Highway and 16`h Ave S. Bus route 500 is known to stop here. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have 115 parking spaces and will be eliminating no parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, the proposed project will construct full width improvements for a new public right-of-way (South 340th Street) along the northern property boundary, plus frontage improvements and a signal modification along Pacific Highway South. No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Weekday PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed Progressive building were estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation (91' Edition, 2012). The Progressive office building is estimated to generate 4 inbound and 21 outbound trips during the weekday PM peak hour based on the average trip generation rate for the General Office land use (#710). These trips were distributed consistent with the Village at Federal Way development and added to the S 340th Street- 16th Avenue S / Pacific Highway S intersection 2016 background traffic volumes. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. The proposed measures to reduce transportation impacts include the design and construction of a new public right-of-way (South 340t" Street) along the northern property line. Traffic impact fees will also be paid to offset any impacts to surrounding roads. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will result in a slight increase in need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. This increase in demand will be offset by fees, levies, and taxes required to be paid by the applicant as part of this development. Also the proposal has been designed in a manner that will provide adequate access for fire, medic, and police vehicles. Page 13 of 13 C. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other (please list) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sanitary Sewer: Water: Electricity: Natural Gas: Telephone: Cable TV: Refuse Service: Lakehaven Utility District Lakehaven Utility District Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Century Link Communications Comcast City of Federal Way SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to snake its decision. SIGNATURE. Evan Mann, Project Planner DATE SUBMITTED: June 7 2013 Page 14 of 13