15-106361 (2)January 19, 2016 Jim Ferrell, Mayor
Ryan Ellinghaus Emailed: B3An(@,28124reIiitectLire.com
2812 Architecture
2812 Colby Avenue
Everett, WA 98201
Re: File 915-106361-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
Pacific Hwy Pavilions Burger King, 31675 Pacific Hwy S, Federal Way
Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development
Review Committee (DRC) held January 14, 2016. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting
was helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted.
This letter surnmarizes comments criven to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC. The members
who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff frorn the City's Planning and Building
Divisions and Public Works Department, and representatives from Lakehaven Utl I ity District and South
King Fire and Rescue. Sorne sections of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) and relevant information
handouts are enclosed with this letter. Please note this letter does not represent all applicable codes. In
preparing, your formal application, please refer to the complete FWRC and other relevant codes for a] I
9-dditional requirements that may apply to your project.
The key contact for your project is Associate Planner Leila WillOLIghby-Oakes, 253-835-2644,
L61a.Willoughby-Oakesachv Af6d6rg!)Msm. For specific technical questions about your project,
please contact the appropriate DRC representative as listed below. Otherwise, any general questions about
the preapplication and pen-nitting process can be referred to your key contact.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposal includes the demolition and replacement of vacant 3,767 sq. ft. Arby's restaurant with a
2,856 sq. ft. Burger King garbage containing two drive -through lanes, a screened be enclosure, and related
11.� I=
site Improvements in the City -Center Frame (CC-F) zone.
MAJOR ISSUES
Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and information
Submitted for preapplication review. These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in the
plans. These major issues only represent comments that the DRC consider most significant to your project
and do not include the majority of the comments provided. The major Issues section is only provided as a
means to highlight critical requirements or issues. Please be sure to read the entire department comments
made in the next section of this letter.
Mr. Ellinghaus
January T 9, 2016
Page 2
Planning Division
• Access to and from drive -through facilities must be approved by the Traffic Division; drive -
through facilities must be designed so that vehicles will not block traffic in the street while
waiting in line and will not unreasonably interfere with on -site traffic flow.
• The front -yard setback from Pacific Highway (a principal pedestrian right-of-way) shall be a minimum
of 5 ft., unless waived by the director and supplernented with amenities. Please see Item #4b.
• The existing site improvements are considered nonconforming in regards to the development and
zoning standards of Title 19.
Traffic Division
• Driveway width shall be 3 )0' for a two-lane two-way driveway per FWRC 19.135.270.
• Provide adequate storage to accommodate the 85"' Percentile queue.
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the
preapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions, please contact
the representative listed for that section.
immiam- MMMUMMMIM
1, Zoning Designation and Use— The subject property is located in the City Center -Frame (CC-F).
Fast food restaurants are a pennitted use within the Entertainment— Etc. Use Zone Chart (FWRC
19.230.030). The following information is based on the inaterials submitted for the preapplication
ineetin1g,
2. is Use Application —The project requires aLlrocc (enclosed).
Process 11 is an administrative review conducted by city staff with a final decision issued by the
Director of Community Development. At the time of intake, if the city determines the application is
incomplete you will be notified of the additional information required for a complete Submittal.
A 120-day time -clock to review the project will stop any time the applicant has been requested by the
city to correct plans, perform required studies, or provide additional information needed to issue a
decision. Please be advised that any request for corrections and/or additional inforination must be
provided within ISO days of written notification, or the land use application will expire.
3. Environmental Review — As proposed, the project is exempt from review under the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as the proposal does not exceed flexible thresholds (buildings
larger than 12,000 square feet, additional parking for 40 or more vehicles).
111 101i, M111111111021il v 11111111
III
Special Regulations andNotesfroin Zone Use Chart — No more than a five-foot building setback
is allowed adjacent to principal pedestrian right(s)-of-way, as determined by the director, unless:
determined by the director; or to allow streetscape amenities, public on -site open space, or other
architectural elernent(s) or improvernents approved under FWRC 19.115 - Community Design
Guidelines.
15- 10636 1 -PC Doc ID 71757
I Ile rovision a )I_ I les to Ui�M Dosea resiailra VIII. i nu
ith thi oil. However, if the applicant provides
urban streetscape amenities, public on -site open space (a pedestrian plaza) or other architectural
elements (i.e., canopies, weather -proofed arbor or pergola with a minimum 6-foot overhang) or
improvements, the proposal may establish a larger setback. For example, the applicant may place
a pedestrian plaza/seatino, area with landscape planters as approved by the Director. Please
address this issue in the narrative submitted with the land use application.
a. Height— Entertainment uses have a 60-foot permitted outright maximum height. The
proposal meets this requirement with a height of less than 21 feet.
b. Lot Coverage —No maximum lot coverage applies. Coverage is determined by other site
requirements (setbacks, surface water facilities, landscaping, etc.).
5. Nonconforming Development —Asa new building is proposed on the lot, the building and all on -
site improvements (parking, landscaping, drive -through facility, curbing, pedestrian connections, etc.)
shall comply with current codes.
6. Bicycle Rack— Bicycle racks should be provided on the new commercial -retail space. Please provide
one bicycle rack near the entrance per FWRC 19.115.050(4)(d).
7. Pedestrian Amenities — Outdoor furniture, fixtures and streetscape elernents such as lighting,
trellises, arbors and raised planters, benches and other forms of seating, and trash receptacles should
be incorporated into the site design. Locating these elements within the front yard in a plaza -like
setting would be optimal, to integrate with the public sidewalk.
1�-edestrian circulation and public spaces — Connections Should be delineated by separate paved
routes using variation in paved texture and color. Multiple -tenant complexes shall provide pedestri
walkways connecting all major business entrances on the site, to provide a clear view to destination
2x_i Princival cross -site yedestrian 9,aLhways shall hav
a minimum clear width of six feet. Approved methods of delineation include: stone, brick or Lgranit _of_wj
WWI cxncrete. Pedestrian grgathwap from rViwhts-ofw
9.nd bus stops to primary entrances, from parking lots to primary entrances and pedestrian areas, sli'm
be accessible and clearly delineated. I
9. Building Design — The proposed improvernents are Subject to an administrative design review. Project
designers shall strive for overall design continuity by using similar elements throughout the project,
C� ID
such as architectural style and features, materials, colors, and textures. While many of the standards
are flexible, any proposed alternative must be equal to or better than what is required. Design
departures need to be requested in the written design guideline narrative.
Please include a written narrative and color building elevations identifying how the project complies
with all applicable design guidelines. Several guidelines applicable to your project are below.
*I flaragim 1 wagglorn 0 "0 111-y Lail i i i W412-Mr.4do 1 a
15-10636 ]-PC Doc ID 717S7
Mr. EllinghausE
January 19, 20
Page 4
creating a more urban pedestrian scale environment.
Building FaqadeModulation and Screening Options —All facades in excess of 60' on new
construction shall incorporate at least two of the four listed treatments. This shall apply to the
northern and sode of the new building.
FaqadeModulation—A minimum depth of 2 feet, minimurn width of 6 feet, and maximum
width of 60 feet. Alternative methods to shape a building, such as angled or curved fagade
elements, offset planes, wing walls, and terracing will be considered, provided that the intent
of the section is met.
Landscape Screening — Eight -foot -wide Type It landscape screening along the base of the
fagade, except Type IV may be used in place of Type 11 for facades that are comprised of 50
percent or more window area, and around building entrances.
iii. Canopy or Arcade —Asa modulation option, canopies or arcades may be used only along
facades that are visible from a right-of-way. As a modulation option, canopies and arcades
must he a minimum of 6feel. Minimum length is 50 percent of the length of thefaqade using
this option.
iv. Pedestrian Plaza — Plaza square footage is equal to one percent of the gross floor area of the
C,
building, but it must be a minimum of 200 square feet. The plaza Should be clearly visible
and accessible frorn the adjacent right-of-way.
The above -referenced "two of four" options shall be incorporated along the entire length of the
facade, in any approved combination. Options used must rneet the dimensional standards as
i Woomm
11111311011100=1
Staff have evaluated the proposal's architectural design and facades. Find a compliance analysis
#f the proposed fagade modulation and screening below:
U&",?4C6 U119 #11014111�; 111*14JUaLIVII. III -_WFUI SCI #111 ILLLtl WICU�,C 1CPAUL a
at least 6 ft. Please construct modulations a U111111-nUrn depth of 2 feet, i-ninimurn width of 6 feet.
Areas of blank wall along this fagade exceed 240 square feet; please screen or provide
architectural features listed above.
lid "lip
ylupvzsc.,� udlivpcs alit vmwIlll�-; 11m,111.1doww1l, III JTLII 1tCPIUL a (.;UIIUPY VTCH
at least 6 ft. Please construct modulations a minimum depth of 2 feet, rninirnUrn width of 6 feet.
Areas of blank wall along this fagade exceed 240 square feet; please screen or provide
architectural features listed_qLbo, .
Western Faade (Rear, internal parking lot): The fagade is less than 60 ft. Screening/Modulation
provisions do not apply.
1 5- 10636 1-PC Doc ID 71757
Mr. Ellinghaus
January 19. 2016
Page 5
ii. Visual access from the street into human services and activities within the building should be
provided.
iii. If the new construction is a separate structure, the buildings should be integrated by elements
Such as plazas, walkways, and landscaping along pedestrian pathways.
iv. Principal facades shall incorporate a variety of pedestrian -oriented architectural treatments
including: distinctive and prominent entrance features; transparent glass such as windows,
doors, or window displays in and adjacent to major entrances; structural modulation where
appropriate to break down building bulk and scale; modulated rooflines, forms, and heights;
architectural articulation; canopies; arcades; pedestrian plazas; murals or other artwork; and
streetscape amenities.
v. At least 40 percent of any ground level principal fagade located along aright -of -way (Pacific
Highway South) must contain transparent glass. (New construction.)
vi. Landscaping shall be used to define and highlight building entrances, plazas, windows,
walkways, and open space, and may include container gardens, wall and window planters,
hanging baskets, seasonal beds, trellises, vines, espaliered trees and shrubs, and rooftop
gardens. Landscaping should not block views to the building or across the site. Foundation
landscaping may be used to enhance, but not replace architectural treatments.
10. Critical Areas — Portions of the subject property are within a I 0-year Wellhead Protection Zone. The
applicant is required to submit a Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement (enclosed) that discloses the
approximate quantities of hazardous materials that will be stored, handled, treated, used, produced,
recycled, or disposed of in connection with the proposed activity.
• Access to and from drive -through facilities must be approved by the Traffic Division; drive -
through facilities must be designed so that vehicles will not block traffic in the street while
waiting in line and will not unreasonably interfere with on -site traffic flow.
0 Per FWRC 19.115.090 (3) (e), drive -through facilities and stacking lanes shall not be located
along, or in conjunction with, a building facade that faces or is clearly visible from a right-of-
r,
way, public sidewalk, or pedestrian plaza. Such facilities shall be located along other, secondary
facades, as determined by the director, and shall meet the separation, screening, and design
standards listed in FWRb)(10, (iii), and
o This shall include Type III landscaping screening and/or architectural element approved
by the department.
12. Required Roof -Top Screening — The following provisions apply to roof -top equipment screening
pursuant to FWRC 19.110.070:
6 ,' 1 (9,361-K, Doc ID 71757
(1) Generally. Except as specified in subsection (2) of this section, vents, mechanical penthouses,
elevator equipment and similar appurtenances that extend above the rooffine Must be surrounded by
a solid sight -obscuring screen that meets the following criteria:
(a) The screen must be integrated into the architecture of the building.
(b) The screen must obscure the view of the appurtenances from adjacent streets and properties.
Chain -link fence with plastic slats is not pen-nitted. Please provide this architectural detail in the
formal land use submittal plan -set.
13. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) — Implementation of CPTED
principles (natural surveillance, access control, and ownership) is required. The enclosed CPTED
checklist must be submitted and complete with the Use Process 11 application.
14. Lighting — In addition to Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) lighting
standards, the following shall apply: lighting levels shall not spill onto adjacent properties; lighting
shall be provided in all loading, storage, and circulation areas; lighting standards shall not reduce the
amount of landscaping required for the project; and lighting fixtures shall not exceed 20 feet in height
and shall include cutoff shields. A photometric lightingplan that ineets the standards of the
Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) 777inimun7 outdoor light levels will be required with the
Process Hsubtnitlal.
15. Garbage & Recycling Receptacles -- The design of the enclosure area should be consistent with the
architectural design of the primary structures on the site. The enclosure shall be screened by a 100
percent sight -obscuring fence or wall and an appropriate landscape screen of Type III Landscaping
defined by FWRC 19.125.050(3) as follows:
"Type III landscaping shall be a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees interspersed with
large shrubs and groundcover. Tree, shrub, and groundcover spacing shall be appropriate for
the species type, and the intent of this section. "
���
Figure I — FWRC 19.125.040(4)
Please submit trash enclosure details (elevations to scale) during the Use Process and Building
Perinit review. Please see Rob Van Orsow and Brian Asbury's connnentsforfurther detail regarding
drains and grease capture in the Critical Aquifer Recharge Area, ten-year capture zone.
16. Curbing — Please provide permanent curbing in all landscape areas (see Item #5 - Repair of Site
Improvements) and adjacent parking areas; other structural barriers may be substituted for curbing
Including concrete wheel stops.
Doc ID: 71757
Mr. Ellinghaus
January 19, 2016
Page 7
17. Parkino, and Parking Lot Landscaping — Pursuant to FWRC 19.23 )0.030, fast food restaurant uses
shall provide I parking stall for each 80 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed building
measures 2,695 square feet; therefore, a minimurn of 34 parking stalls are required.
For each parking space, 22 square feet of interior lot Type IV landscaping shall be provided. For the
area impacted approximately 960 square feet of interior landscaping shall be provided.
Landscape islands shall be a minimum size of 64 square feet; a maximum of 305 square feet; and a
W11111ful-I idth of 6 feet at the narrowest i oint for islands at the end of 90-degree parking rows, 3
feet in wi th at the end ot rows with angled parKIfIg, attu N YeeL III
head -to -head parking stalls.
Type IV landscaping shall be provided in the proposed parking lot landscaped areas. Type IT
landscaping is composed of trees planted with supporting shrubs and groundcover (native
species encouraged, 25 percent d rought- resistant planting). One tree per landscape island up to
150 square feet shall be planted. One additional tree shall be planted for landscape island up to 3 )05
square feet (Figure I).
.ire 1. Type IV Landscaping
Please submit a parking/landscape plan analysis (data table) with the Use Process showing the
proposal meets minimum requirements.
Meeting Follow-up: The applicant shall provide a parking lot calculation for the entire Pavilions 11
site. Due to driveway width requirements the applicant proposed the removal of existing parking
spaces. Per FWRC 19.130.020, exceptions to required stall count include the submission of a parking
study in accordance with FWRC 19.130.080(2), concluding there is sufficient on -site capacity. The
applicant may also re -stripe the existing parking lot to designate LIP to 40 percent (no more than 20
spaces) as compact stalls.
18. Landscaping Plan — A landscape plan prepared by a Washington State licensed landscape architect
shall be submitted with the formal application. Please follow general guidelines outlined in FWRC
19.125.040(l) through (26) when preparing the site plan and planting schedule. The following
regulations are specific to Your proposal:
a. PeritneterlBuffer—A 5-foot-wide Type III (Visual Buffer landscaping screen will be required
along all perimeter lot lines, except for the front yard. Surface parking perimeters will require
the reduction of visual impacts by either incorporating berms at least three feet in height within
perimeter landscape areas; or, adding Substantial shrub plantings to the required perimeter
15-106'W-PC Doc ID 71757
and groundcover, in a number sufficient to act as efficient substitute for the three-foot berin.
C�
No front perimeter buffer is required in the front yard as this area shall be integrated with the
pedestrian street-scape along Pacific Highway South.
Additional landscape screening will be necessary along the property line abutting the proposei
double drive -through in order to screen head -lights from the adjacent property.
b. Foundation Landscaping —All developments are encouraged to reduce the scale, bulk and height
of structures. Foundation landscaping placed along the northern and western property line is
4n
advised (see Itern 10a).
c. Tree RetentionlReplaceinent— The city's tree canopy standards do not apply to properties within
the CC-F zone; therefore, no tree unit per acre calculation will be required.
FWRC 19.125.040, found in the landscaping chapter, requires the screening of blank walls.
tl
Building wails which are uninterrupted by window, door, or other architectural feature(s) listed
in Chapter 19.115 FWRC, Community Design Guidelines, FWRC 19.1 15.060(3)(b) (listed below),
that are 240 square feet or greater In area, and not located oil a property line, shall be screened by
landscaping.
Methods to articulate blank walls: Following is a nonexclusive list of methods to articulate blank
walls, pursuant to FWRC 19 125.040(21) and subsection (3)(a) of FWRC 19.115.
(1) Showcase, display, recessed windows;
(ii) Window openings with visible trim material, or painted detailing that resembles trim;
(iii) Vertical trellis(es) in front of the wall with climbing vines or similar planting;
(iv) Set the wall back and provide a landscaped or raised planter bed in front of the wall, with
plant material that will obscure or screen the wall's surface;
(v) Artwork such as mosaics, murals, decorative masonry or metal patterns or grillwork,
to
Sculptures, relief, etc., over a substantial portion of the blank wall Surface. (The Federal Way Arts
Commission may be used as an advisory body at the discretion of the planning staff);
(v]) Architectural features such as setbacks, indentations, overhangs, projections, articulated
cornices, bays, reveals, canopies, and awnings;
�= M
(vill) Landscaped public plaza(s) with space for vendor carts, concerts and other pedestrian
activities.
MeetingFollow-up.- The applicant discussed the use of an existing retaining wall shared with the
abutting property. Parcels in the CC-F zone require a five-foot Type III landscaping buffer along all
perimeter lot lines. The applicant expressed concern regarding this requirement. Accordingly, the
I S- 10636 1 -PC Doc ID..717?7
1 5 wrol ILI FlIfid I from I I LOIS I I I MR Is LIJ IMILWARN I L"NAA. t4 ff I&" V V Lw
WON=
(e) criteria Tne M001TIcaTion may 67 approvet. X lonal
will be imposed elsewhere on the project.
19. Sign Permits — Please apply for separate sign permits for any proposed signs through a Development
Specialist (253-83 )5-2607 or complying with the standards of
FWRC 19.140.
20. Demolition' Permit — Please contact the Federal Way Permit Center, located at 3 33 3325 8t" Avenue
South, Federal Way, regarding the submission of a separate demolition pen -nit for the existing
structures and improvements at 253-835-2607 or
2 1. Application Fees & Submittal — Please contact the Penn it Center at 253-83 5-2607 for updated fee
schedules for the Process 11 Master Land Use application, concurrency, engineering review, and
building permit. Building pen -nits may be submitted concurrently with the Use Process Application at
the proponent's own risk.
ann.dowergeityoffederalway.com)
Land Use Issues — Stormwater
I Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment are Currently required per the 2009 King
County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City of Federal Way Addendum to the
2009 KCSWDM. The City of Federal way anticipates adoption of a new KCSWDM in 2016, possib
as early as February. Vesting to current stormwater regulations will be granted for projects that hav
submitted a complete land use application prior to adoption of the new manual. I
2. This project meets the requirements for a Full Drainage Review. At the time of land use site plan
submittal, a preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR), addressing the relevance of the projeci
to the eight core and five special requirernents of the KCSWDM will be required. A Level I
downstream analysis shall also be provided in the preliminary TIR. The City has 1 100', five-foot
contour planirnetric maps that may be used for basin analysis.
3. The project lies within a Conservation flow control area, thus the applicant must design the flow
control facility to meet this performance criteria. In addition to flow control facilities, Best
Management Practices (BMP's) conforming to KCSWDM Section 5.2.1.3 Large Lot High
Impervious Area are required.
Note that flow control for this project was previously provided through to the Kitt's Corner Regional
Detention Facility. Because flow control will continue to be provided at the previously approved
level, existing site conditions may be used rather than historic site conditions in modeling peak flows.
Exception 1.2.3.13.2 may apply.
4. The project lies within an Enhanced Basic Water Quality Area. Water Quality Treatment shall be
designed to meet the treatment criteria of the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Menu. Staff also expects
that the site will be a "high -use" site due to traffic Volumes, and Special Requirement #5 Oil Control
will apply.
15-106361-PC Doc..ID, 71757
5. In addition to the KCSWDM, our initial review suggests that FWRC 19.30.120, "Nonconformiflp_l
Water Quality Improvements" applies to this site. Specifically, the following iterns are applicabli
Le. Redevelopment which involves the repair or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of an
impervious surface, when such redevelopment is not part of a routine maintenance activity;
I.d. Redevelopment which involves the collection and/or concentration of surface and/or stonnwater
runoff frorn a drainage area of 5,000 square feet or more;
I.g. Redevelopment, other than normal maintenance or other than the tenant improvements, but
including ang increase in gross floor area.. in anpA one consecutive 12-month -,teriod which exceeds 50
percent of the assessed or appraised value (whichever is greater) of the structure or improvement
being redeveloped. The applicant may provide an appraisal of the improvement. The appraisal must
be frorn a source acceptable to the City. The Director may require the applicant to provide an
appraisal frorn a second source acceptable to the City if the assessed valuation appears to be
inaccurate or inappropriate. If more than one appraisal is provided by the applicant or required by th*
City, the greater of the two amounts shall be used. For purposes of this determining value under this
section, improvements required pursuant to FWRC Sections 19.30.090 (nonconfon-ning
development), 19.30.110 (street/sidewalk improvements), 19.30.120 (nonconforming water quality
improvements) and 19.135.030 (street/sidewalk improvements) shall not be counted towards the 50
percent threshold which would trigger application of this subsection;
Therefore, water quality treatment will be required for the entire parcel, including new and existing
pollution generating surfaces. Treatment Options must be selected from the Enhanced Basic Water
fLiality Menu provided in the KCSWDM.
6. If infiltration is proposed, soil logs prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer or septic designer
must be provided to verify infiltration suitability.
7. Detention and water quality facilities Must be above ground (i.e. open pond). Underground facilities
z:l
are allowed only with approval from the City of Federal Way Public Works Department. Staff will
support underground facilities for this site.
C�
8. Show the proposed location and dimensions of the detention and water quality facilities on the
preliminary plans.
Rfight-of-Way Improvements
See the Traffic Division comments from Sarady Long, Sr. Transportation Planning Engineer, for traffic
related items.
MOMMIAMM=
I Engineered plans are required for clearing, grading, is construction, and utility work. Plans must be
reviewed and approved by the City. Engineering review fees are $1,125.00 for the first 12 hours of
review, and $93.75 per hour for additional review tirne. A final TIR shall be prepared for the project
and submitted with the engineering plans. Both the TIR and the plans will require the signatUre/seal
of a professional engineer registered/licensed in the state of Washington.
I S- 10636 ]-PC Doc ID 71757
Mr. Elliflghaus
January 19, 2016
Page I I
2. The Federal Way Puhlic Works Development Standards Manual (including standard detail drawings,
I zn
standard notes, and engineering checklists) is available on the City s website at
bM26��;,citvoffbdem,l�wmgy.com/index.,a x9nid=1 Ito assist the applicant's engineer in preparing
the plans and TIR.
Bonding is required for all street improvements, storm water facilities, and temporary erosion and
sediment control measures associated with the project. The bond amount shall be 120 percent of the
estimated costs of the improvements. An administrative fee deposit must accompany the bond to
cover any possible legal fees in the event the bond must be called. Upon completion of the installation
of the improvements, and final approval of the Public Works Inspector, the bond will be reduced to
30 percent of the original amount and held for a two-year maintenance period.
4. The developer will be responsible for the maintenance of all storm drainage facilities (including the
C, ZD
detention and water quality facilities) and street systems. During the two-year maintenance period, the
Public Works Inspector will make periodic visits to the site to ensure the developer's compliance with
the maintenance requirements. Upon satisfactory completion of the two-year maintenance period, the
remainder of the bond will be released. Maintenance for private roads and drainage facilities remain
the responsibility of the 'Individual property owners.
5. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans, the vertical datum block shall include
the phrase `'DATUM: N.G.V.D.-29" or "DATUM: K.C.A.S.," on all sheets where vertical elevations
are called out.
6. Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" paper. Site plans shall
be drawn at a scale of 1 20', or larger. Architectural scales are not permitted on engineering plans.
1
7. Provide cut and fill quantities on the clearing and grading plan.
8. Temporary Erosion and Sediment -control (TESC) rneaSLII-CS, per Appendix D of the 2009 KCSWDM,
just be shown on the engineering plans.
9. The site plan shall show the location of any existing and proposed utilities in the areas affected by
construction.
1. Driveway width shall be 30' for a two-lane two-way driveway per FWRC 19.135.270.
PUBLIC WORKS - SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING DivISION (Rob Van Orsow, 253-835-2770,
robvg,cityriffederalway-coni)
• Provide signage regarding enclosure access and operation to reduce conflict with drive -through and
enclosure (e.g. hours).
• Provide an enclosure roofline high enough to enable access by the waste management hauler vehicle.
• There is adequate 'recycling storage space' allocated — at approx. 490 sq. ft., the enclosure is large
enough for a properly -scaled solid waste compactor plus a recycling dLIMpster, and spent fryer oil
I S_ 106116 1 -P(' Doc ID. 7P57
Mr. Ellinp-haus
January 19.. 2016
Page 12
storage. The building size (2856 sq. ft.) requires the minimum 65 sq. ft. designated for 'recycling
storage space.' They could be designated within the enclosure area in a future plan.
If the applicant plans to utilize a waste compactor, please specify a self-contained design (not 'break-
away' or 'stationary'), and consider tying drainage into the sanitary sewer to reduce waste disposal
costs.
Solid Waste & Recycling Design Considerations
Solid waste and recycling design considerations include:
• Adequate space allocation for interior and exterior garbage, recycling, food waste, waste oil, yard
debris, hazardous waste, or biohazard collection containers. Minimum recycling space allocation is
established by FWRC 19.125.150.
• For basic solid waste and recycling needs within a single enclosure, clear interior dimensions
measuring 10' deep by 20' across are recommended, along with a two -door swing -open or roll -open
gate that spans the front width of the enclosure. When gate doors are opened, no structure or
hardware should remain above grade across the enclosure opening. Gate pins/holes are preferred for
holding gates in closed and open positions to ease service access and maximize the life of gate
hardware.
• Sites may require a larger enclosure, or multiple enclosures, to accommodate on -site user access
and/or additional waste types and containers.
• Plan for user access to interior waste and recycling storage areas/containers, and to exterior
containers screened by enclosure(s).
• Plan for unobstructed, safe enclosure ingress and egress for service vehicles, directly in line with
enclosure openings. Allow appropriate turning radii for service vehicles, and minimize potential
`blind spots' during ingress and egress.
• Consider landscaping, setbacks and screening requirements [based on FWRC Section 19.125.040 (4)
& (5)].
Help with many design parameters related to service access is available via the City's contracted solid
waste services provider, Waste Management. Contact: John Davis — Senior Route Manager at 206-786-
4530 (cell).
Transportation Concurrency Analysis (FWRC 19.90)
The proposal is not expected to generate any new weekday PM peak hour trips. As Such, a concurrency
permit is NOT required for this development project.
Street Frontage Improvements (FWRC 19.135)
With the proposed redevelopment, the applicant/owner Would be expected to construct street improvernents
consistent with the planned roadway cross -sections as shown in Map 111-4 of the FWCP and Capital
• Program (CIP) shown as Map 111-1. However, since the frontage on SR 99 was improved by
the City to current standards, no additional improvements will be required.
International Bde (I BQ, 2012
Washington State Amendments WAC 51--54
15-106361 -PC Doc ID 7M7
Mr. Ellinghaus
January 19. 2016
Page 13
International Mechanical Code (IC), 2012
Washington State Amendments WAC 51-52
Uniforin Plumbing Code (UPC), 2012
Washington State Amendments WAC 51-56 & WAC 51-57
International Fire Code (IFC), 2012
Washington State Amendments WAC 51 -54
National Electric Code(NEC), 2012
Accessibility Code, ICC/ANSI AI 17.1 - 2009
Washington State Energy Code, 2012 WAC 5 1 -11
Building Criteria
Occupancy Classification: A-3
Type of Construction: V-13 Area: 2,695
Number of Stories: 1
Fire Protection: N/A
Wind/Seismic: Basic wind speed 85 Mph, Exposure, 25# Snow load, Seismic Zone D-1
A complete building permit application and commercial checklist. (Additional copies of application and
checklists may be attained on our web site at w�� y.citvoffederalwa oni.)
Submit _5 sets of drawings and specifications. Specifications shall include: _2 Soils report, `3_
Structural calculations, and _2 Energy calculations, _2 Ventilation calculations. Note: A Washington
State Registered architects' stamp is required for additions/alterations (new or existing) of 4,000 gross
floor area or greater unless specifically listed as an "exempt" structure per the Revised Code of
Washington (C).
Energy code compliance worksheets are required to be completed and included with your pen -nit
application.
A wet stamp and signature is required on all sheets of plans and on the cover page of any calculations
submitted.
Federal Way reviews plans on a first in, first out basis; however, there are some small projects with
inconsequential review requirements that may be reviewed out of order.
I5-106361-PC Doc.: ID: 71757
Mr. Ellin "haull
January 19, 2,
Page 14
Review Timing
The first comment letter can be expected within fourweeks of submittal date. Re -check of plans will occur
in one to three weeks after re -submittal.
Revised or resubmitted plans shall be provided in the same format, size, and amount as the originally
submitted plans. Revised/resubmitted drawings shall indicate by means of clouding or written response,
what changes have been made from the original drawings. Plans for all involved departments will be
forwarded from the Community Development Department.
Other Permits & Inspections
Separate permits may be required for electrical, mechanical, plumbing, fire suppression systems, and
gns. Applicants may apply for separate permits at any time prior to commencement of construction.
When required, special inspections shall be performed by WABO approved agencies or by agencies
approved by the building official prior to permit issuance. Construction must be approved by all
reviewing departments prior to final building division inspection.
All concerned departments (Planning, Public Works, Electrical, & Fire) must sign off before the BuildinZDe,
Department can final the structure for occupancy. Building final must be approved prior to the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy.
Construction projects may be required to have a pre -construction conference. If a pre -con meeting is
required, the general or representative, all subs, the architect or representative, the engineer or
representative, electrical contractor, and any other interested party, should attend this meeting. Meetings
will occur at the Building Departinentand will be scheduled by the inspector of record for the project.
The information provided is based on limited plans and information. The comments provided are
not intended to be a complete plan review and further comments are possible at time of building
permit plan review.
Water
• A Certificate of Water Availability (application form enclosed) issued separately by Lakehaven may
be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land
use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one (1) year from date Of issuance. If Certificate
is needed, allow 1-2 work days to issue for typical.
• Fire Flow at no less than 20 psi available within the water distribution system is a mHurnUM of 2500
apm This (approximate) for two (2) hours or more. flow figure depicts the theoretical performance of
I
the water distribution system under high demand conditions. If more precise available fire flow
figures are required or desired, Applicant can request Lakehaven perform a system hydraulic model
analysis (separate from, or concurrent with, an application for Availability). Current 2016 cost for a
hydraulic model analysis is $200.00. Fire flow rates greater than available in the existing distribution
system may be accommodated through water distribution System improvements. Please contact
Lakehaven for further detail.
• The site has the following existing water service connections:
Domestic: SvcNo. 224, P/2" meter.
• A water service connection application submitted separately to Lakehaven is required for each new
service connection to the water distribution system, or any modification to an existing water service
ZD
15-10636141C DocID 7M7
Mr. Ellinghaus
January 19, 2016
Page 15
Sewer
• A Certificate of Sewer Availability (application form enclosed) issued separately by Lakehaven may
be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land
use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one (1) year from date of issuance. If Certificate
is needed, allow 1-2 work days to issue for typical.
• The site has one (1) existing sewer service connection (copies of sewer service records attached,
SSCP 2869 (original connection) & SSCP 22860).
• Capping of any existing sewer service connection at/near property line is required for any on -site full
building demolition; a sewer service connection permit from Lakehaven is required for this (copy of
application form attached). Please contact Lakehaven for further information regarding these issues.
• A separate Lakehaven sewer service connection permit is required for each new connection to the
sanitary sewer systern or any modification (re -align, abandon, etc.) to an existing sewer service
connection, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's Current 'Fees and Charges
Resolution'. Minirnurn pipe slope for grav ity sewer service connections is 2%. In addition to all other
sewer service installation standards, installation of a Type 1, 48 monitoring manhole is typically
required on the private building sewer I me, for all new or modified non-residential connections. Also,
installation of an externally -located grease interceptor is required for all new restaurants & food
service establishments, size to be determined by applicant's engineer.
10 See enclosed standards & requirements for connecting Trash/Recycling Enclosure areas to sewer.
15-M361-IT Doc ID 71797
Applicant will be required to complete and submit a Sewer Use Survey (SUS, copy attached).
Information in the SUS will be used by Lakehaven to determine specific pretreatment requirements
(if any). Restaurants &/or commercial food preparation facilities must install & utilize an externally -
located, grease interceptor; size to be determined by applicant's engineer.
Based on the proposal submitted, preliminary estimated Lakehaven sewer service connection
fees/charges/deposits (2016 schedule) will be as follows. Actual connection charges will be
determined upon submittal of service connection application(s) to Lakehaven. All Lakehaven fees,
charges and deposits are typically reviewed & adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to
change without notice.
6 Sewer Service Connection Pen -nit (SSCP) Fee (x2): $300.00 each.
41 Capital Facilities Charge(s)-S ewer: $12,791.94. Sewer system capacity credits are available for
this property from systern capacity charges previously assessed, paid directly to Lakehaven,
and/or credited to the property for 2.68 ERU. Using actual domestic water usage from the Burger
King at 1105 S 348th St as a preliminary comparative figure would indicate an annual average
usage of 6.67 ERU. Please contact Lakehaven for further detail.
Other (describe): $None anticipated.
Iff-M-Me
All comments herein are valid for one (1) year and are based on the proposal(s) submitted and
Lakehaven's current rewlations and iolicies. Ani chanae to either the develarient QroDosaUc4.g-Y-
I 11HUMM I M" I MMM ON I SLOMIN I It! a 91111 ol rwo 11 r.. 'M I a com a 11 rdro I ILSAW-JRK61 If #I I m I I 1071rewelyJ all I I I pil
provided indicating the fire flow available at the site.
This project will require I fire hydrant. Existing fire hydrants on public streets are available for this project.
Existin fire h drants on adiacent iroierties shall not be cinidered inli t s 2-ccess r*ads ey1=4
Fire -Extinguishing Systems
An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in Group A2 Occupancies with an occupant load of 100
PE more.
CLOSING
This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication meeting and is intended to assist You in
preparing plans and materials for formal application. We hope you found the comments useful t0'YOUr
project. We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate Surprises during the City's
review of the formal application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter
does not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per
FWRC 19.40.070 (4).
As You know, this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will
follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letterare based on preapplication
materials submitted.
B 5-1 063M-K Doe ID 71757
the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project.
If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department
_Jid Ai.% general guestions can be directed towards the kei, iroiect contact,
Sincerely,
- 62iw
Leila Willoughby -Oakes
Associate Planner
enc: Process 11 Submittal Requirements (Required Document Indicated)
Master Land Use Application
CPTED Checklist
Recycling and Solid Waste Enclosures
Lakehaven Enclosures
FWRC 19.115.060 (b) Building Design
FWRC 19.130.020- Number of spaces- Minimum
FWRC 19.125.10- Landscape Modification Approval/Submittal Criteria
Parking Lot Criteria
Site Plan Mark -Ups
c: Ann Dower. Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer
Sarady Long. Senior Transportation Planning Engineer
Brian Asburv, Lakehaven Utility District
Vince Faranda, South King Fire & Rescue
Rob VanOrsow, Solid Waste and Recycling
15- 10636 1 -PC Doe ID: 717i7
im
Jim Ferrell, Mayor
Northwest LLC Emailed: mescamilla0ftfor-con!
3023 801h Avenue SE, Suite #200
Mercer Island, WA 98040
FILE #15- 106361-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED
Pavilions 11 Burger King, 31675 Pacific Hwy South, Federal Way (Parcel-082104 9077)
The Community Development Department is in receipt of your preapplication conference request.
The application has been routed to members of the Development Review Committee and a meeting
with the project applicant has been scheduled as follows:
)a,,n �2
9:00 a.m. — Thursday, Januar*o~wv---� / C (
Hylebos Conference Room rt(
1212 It C dii //9
Federal Way City Hall, 2nd Floor
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
We look forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else YOU Would like to
attend the meeting as this will be the only notice sent by the department. If YOU have any questions
regarding the meeting, please contact me at or 253-
835-2644.
Sincerely,
PeilaWilloug yL-Oakes
Associate Planner
C: Ryan Ellinghaus, 2812 Architecture,
Doe I D 71841
CITY OF FEDEWK T.AX
C0MNXJNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEA
DATE: December 16, 2015
TO: E.J. Walsh, Development Services Manager
Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner
Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District
Vince Faranda, South King Fire & Rescue
Lindsey Tiroux, Public Safety Officer (Emailed)
Rob Van Orsow, Solid Waste/Recycling Coordinator (Emailed)
Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer
Ben Han, King County Metro (Emailed)
Pierce County Metro (Emailed)
FRON: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Planning
FOR DRC MTG. ON: December 31, 2015, 9:00 AM -Internal
January 7, 2015, 9:00 AM - with applicant
............................. ................
FILE NUMBER(s): 15-106361-00-PC (Pre -application)
PROJECT NAME: BURGER KING
PROJECT ADDRESS: 31675 Pacific Highway South
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demolish existing restaurant building and construct
new Burger King to include double drive thru-lanes and
trash enclosure.
PROJECT CONTACT: Ryan Ellinghaus
2812 Architecture
2812 Colby Ave
Everett WA 98201
For Northwest LLC
Mark Escamilla
3023 80th Ave. SE Suite 200
MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plan Set
Narrative
t5 -1 N 3� i - 0o - PC,-
APPLICATION (s) ate 5
Property Address/Locationaak
�' w, * 1 7
Parcel Number(s)
roject Description _ t . N
t " ,� `
AarType of of e i e e
Annexation
Binding Site Plan
Boundary Line Adjustment
Camp Plan/Rezone
Land Surface Modification
Lot Line Elimination
Preapplication Conference
Process I (Director's Approval)
Process II (Site Plan Review)
Process III (Project Approval)
Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone)
Process VI
SEPA w/Project
SEPA Only
Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use
Short Subdivision
Subdivision
Variance: Commercial/Residential
alue of Existing Improvemen
alue of Proposed . .
International Building .s
Occupancy
Construction T
Applicant
Name.t s (®
Address: m ��t a�� 0 KIVEa
Cit /State: , 't - " : wN ,
Phone-6?DG 7-Z 2-1
Fax:
Email: r t " C b
Sigriatu�"e:: '
Agent (if different than Applicant)
Name: 2- lam` i — C r t "
Address:i
City/State:
-a i
Phone(4 2— i c�;
Fax.
Email: i--d cam
Signature:
Owner -
Name:
a
�P
Address: i ° i `` oQk
City/State:' Ji' . D I CI
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Signature:
Page 1 of 1 _ k:\Han
douts\Master ndoutslMastez- Land Use Application
RECEIVED
DEC 16 Z015
CITY OF 'RAC, WAY
CDS
15DEC15
New Burger King Restaurant
31675 Pacific Highway South
Federal Way, Wa 98003
This project includes the demolition of the existing Arby's restaurant (3,767sf) and trash
enclosure at the Pavilions II shopping center. Once cleared a new Burger King restaurant
with trash enclosure and double drive through lane is to be constructed in its place. The
existing parking and landscape areas west of the building will remain.
The new restaurant will be 2,695sf and will contain dining area, restrooms, kitchen and
storage areas. The maximum height of the building will be 21'-0" and will have vary plate
heights and towers to break up the roofline.
The building main color will be tan stucco with a brown brick wainscot around the base of
the building. The facade will be broken up by black culture stone towers at the entry
doors and at the drive -through windows. Silver canopies will be installed at the towers
and over the dining room windows. The exterior finish at the entry and dining room doors
will be red glazed tile to accent those entries.
2812 Colby Avenue Everett WA 98201
P (425)252-2153 F (425)742-8130 www.2812architecture.com
w
Coffee shops produced the longest maximum queues of any of the land uses in this study with
all of the maximum queues occurring in the morning. In four of the six cases, the queues spilled
out of the parking lot and into the street. These spillovers would typically only happen once or
twice a day and last only a few minutes, however, one location had stacking into the street for
about 15 minutes in addition to multiple periods of several minutes where cars would queue in
the street.
With an 85th percentile maximum queue of 13 vehicles, the data suggests that coffee shops
with drive -through lanes should be able to accommodate at least 260 feet of vehicle stacking
during morning hours.
3.4 Fast Food Restaurants
Data collection was done at six fast food restaurants with drive -through services in August 2011
and February 2012. Fourteen days of data were collected. The restaurants were located in the
cities of Golden Valley, Hopkins, Minneapolis and St. Louis Park, MN. Vehicles being served
were counted as being in the queue.
Table 3.4 — Drive -Through Fast Food Restaurant Maximum Queue Statistics
Number of Data Points
14
Average Maximum Queue (Vehicles)
8.50
Standard Deviation (Vehicles)
2.68
Coefficient of Variation
32%
Range (Vehicles)
5-13
85th Percentile (Vehicles)
12.00
33rd Percentile (Vehicles)
7.90
Drive -Through Queue Generation 7 February 2012
CITY OF
'k Federal Way
FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS CHECKLIST
The following checklist is intended to be used to assist Public`Works Traffic Division in determining
streets frontage improvements requirement in meeting FWRC 19.135 and Nexus.
I. Background
1 . Project Name: —Pavilions 11 Bgrger King
2. DC meeting Date: Jan. 14 2015 File Number:15-106361-PC
3. Project Location: 31675 Pacific Highway S
4. Project Description: Demolish existing 3,993 SF Arby's Restaurant and construct
2,695 SF Burger King with dual drive-thru
5. Identify adjacent development zoning within V2 mile of the proposed site (check all if
applicable):
Commercial/Retail El Schools/Parks
E] Multi/Single Family
11. Frontage Improvements Per FWRC 19.135
1. Please check whether this is a new, redevelopment or expansion project.
❑ New E Redevelopment 0 Expansion
If this is a redevelopment or expansion project, please verify in meeting the 25 percent threshold
per FV*TRC 19.13 5.03 0 (a).
0 Less than 25% Exceeds 25% N/A
III. Traffic Generation and Distribution
1. Identify Land Use Code and Trips for existing and future project during Critical Hours (hours
of largest impact) for analysis based on the Latest Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip
Generation Manual.
Existing Building Land Use Code; ITE LU 934
roMm7ron M41
ITE LU 934
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-thru
ADT -
Saturday Peak
Saturday Daily
Sunday Peak
Sunday Daily
J-
Z*1f -ADT is not available, for estimate use PM peak multiply by 10.
2. Identify pedestrian activities and provide data source if available. If not available, estimate
pedestrian trip generated by proposed development. How many pedestrian is expected to be
generated by the proposed project?
El None Z I or More
Please check expected pedestrian type.
El School EJ Elderly
0 General
Data source: Located in CC
3. Trip Distribution. Utilizing existing land use and traffic condition to estimate trip distribution
and identify road(s) that new trips will be using. Provide location of new facilities and
existing facilities impacted by increased traffic. Identify, site access points, functional
classification, and ADT of streets fronting the proposed development.
* If no direct access and/or significant project's trips on street frontage, improvement or ROW dedication may not be warranted
Additional information: SR 99 fully constructed to City standard with �8'sidewalk a�ndli �ts.
Sidewalk connects to other retails,
IV. Street Frontage Improvements - Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) and Capital
ImprovementFWRC 19.135.030 (1).
1. Is there any street frontage impacted by TIP/CIP? El Yes No
(See CIF and latest adopted TIP)
119"Wis"IN111 ; I ITTE I - H H I a - 4 a
ky
"I
1'"M
b. If the development proposal has frontage on a project listed in the City's TIP and that project
is not fully funded, the Applicant shall pay a pro-rata share of the T1P project of the City's
estimated construction cost for street frontage improvements in accordance with the following
formula. In addition, the Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way consistent with adopted
Comprehensive Plan and any additional planned turn lanes.
Pro-rata development site frontage X (TIP Project Cost — Value of Dedicated
share (linear feet) Right -of -Way)
total project frontage (linear
feet)
C. If the development proposal does not have frontage on a project listed on the City's Six -year
TIP, the Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way consistent with adopted Comprehensive Plan
and any additional turn lanes and construct these street frontage improvements.
Safety and Non -motorized Facilities
1. Check Transit Service and Pedestrian Facilities - Numbers of bus stopping and pedestrian
activities around the project.
Adequate width of sidewalk (suggest min. of 5 feet)
Sidewalks connect to Schools/Parks
At ultimate grade
M Pedestrian facility connections to other development and bus sto7.
Location of bus shelters or drop-off areas: Walking distance to Ttaho_Q�
A. SR 99
El None El I to 3 3+
[a
El None El I to 3 3+
C.
El None El 1 to 3 El 3+
3. Verify Level of Service (LOS) and queues at immediate impacted intersections next to street
frontage.
a No LOS failure expected with CC average LOS
Identify Turning radii and sight distance at proposed accesses.
* Revise driveway width to a min. of 30' and provide adequate storage for the drive-thru
VL Recommendation/Conclusion
1. Are street(s) frontage Improvements Warranted based on the analysis?
1:1 Yes No
If c• • • which frontages meets warrant and whether the .••". will •
required to build the improvements or contribute pro-rata.
Additional comments on this project: Frontage on SR 99 was construc -ed bLCity�art _ofSR �99�
CaP
I I '. .- • ..
:
i9
a BBx'�rN' �x
5y
9C P-t R
s
HP 4p RCS Wt dF TP s*
a^#.•t.*
,J
Y IAPIaBa
'^ &dCd' o�Ri dBTk"v �X+R�;SI
EiYi`
-BYLBQ-Z TO O]B
«75 =....-+«
At3{'ha�ISR�OIlB'Bi'• -•+ �•
. s
F�lRF
Moil
m
Osl
n _OOB
a
a
`Q�re
m
f
�
t
cam, G4 T�s EF,
R '
� 3
3
�Y'
B9`eR�
I�
t.¢:.47AXL7..F
21
wv4�,
dCoJA- A
a rFP7 �
�
�
o
lop
0
T
C
" EB'!Bl
U£E
OE 5 B 1 I
S3AV H16
^I
t
DBl
w
n - a
r
s�
o
O
I
y w M
-
F
}
y
w
q
ro
King County Department of Development and. Environmental Services
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
9� .
I
L_J
Projeci Owner
� Prr0�. %t,�'
P o ect Name
vl' i 1 IQ !:� �� 7_
Address
Z
01 W4. .5%)Gt
Location
2
—1504
Township
Phone S l•O I
Range
. Z ` ® 4�0 4 (0
..=.,....Section
Project Engineer
Company
Address/Phone
rt-�
I "Imn. "'I.
Subdivison
DFW HPA Shoreline Management
Short Subdivision
COE 404 Rockery
Grading
DOE Dam Safety Structural Vaults ?C,
Commercial
FEA FI . plain Other
Other
COEWetlands
*tl X '''• u"e . 'Miia�"µ..'. .� «L'' 4+,y� � :� "r� ` 9 bpi 2T+�"`ye w" A' S i5 .ia F w 'Y
E
t
Community
Drainage Basin
. ,fit 6 ' CH��ta�CT • : [STD, =µ � •X
River
Floodplain
Wetlands
Stream
Seeps/Springs
Critical Stream Reach
High Groundwater Table
Depressions/Swales
Groundwater Recharge
Lake
Other
Steep Slopes
0
Grass Lined Tank Infiltration
Method of Analysis
Channel XVault COe," l+ }Depression
)C Pipe System /+ Compensation/Mitigati
Energy Dissapator Flow Dispersal on of Eliminated Site
Open Channel Wetland Waiver Storage
DryPond
Stream (Regional
Wet Pond r 'Detention
Brief Description of System Operation
tad t� tt
t't..
Facility Related Site Limitations
Reference Facility Limitation
�4 Cast in Place Vault Drainage Easement
rX Retaining Wall Access Easement
-Rockery> 4' High Native Growth Protection, Easement
Structural on Steep Slope Tract
Other Other
o .
or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site
conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of
my knowledge the information provided here is accurate.
DI
ShiodVale
CQRE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
CORE REQUIREMENT NO. 1: DISCHARGE AT THE NATURAL DRAINAGE LOCATION
The current site is developed with the exception of approximately 1.5 acres located adjacent to the west
property line, north of Office Max and nearly 400' south of 316th Street. Discharge from the redeveloped
site will, be collected via a new storm drainage system and outfall to a Federal Way conveyance pipe
connecting to the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility.
CODE REQUIREMENT NO. 2: OFF -SITE ANALYSIS
Stormwater runoff from the proposed development site will be collected onsite via catch basins and routed
through onsite water quality treatment facilities. After water quality treatment, the runoff will use the
existing Federal Way closed conveyance system to Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility. Within the
last 2-3 years the existing Federal Way conveyance to Kitts Comer has no recorded drainage problems
according to Mr. Kevin Peterson, City Staff. Of1site analysis details for up/downstream are provided in
following sections of this report (see Exhibit E).
I 1 11 CIIIIIIIIII? a
VIT11 rn$
If
t CORE REQUIREMENT NO. 4: CONVEYANCE SYSTEM
New onsite conveyance pipe will be sized to minimally convey and contain the 25-year peak flow per
section 1.2.4.1 of the City of Federal Way addendum to King County Surfhce Water Design Manual.
Conveyance calculations used the rational method for pipe sizing and are attached to this report.
CORE REQUIREMENT NO. 5: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
standards, Stockpiles and erosion prone disturbed earth will be protected;with either clear plastic covering
or seeding, depending upon the duration of the condition. AM downhill slopes and functioning catch basins
will be protected with filter fabric fence to prevent sediment transport offsite. Functioning catch basins will
be left in operation until such time that the new drain -age system is in effect. At that time, the existing
system catch basins will be demolished and their conveyance pipe plugged or removed. Stabilized
construction entrances will be constructed prior to any earthwork. This will prevent the tracking of soil
onto the public right of way.
A maintenance schedule for all components of the drainage/water quality system is outlined under Section
10 of the Technical Information Report.
1= I ill � I 1 111 11 1 1 1 i III I I I I I I I I Ill I I I � � �
wgmcazl=�
Al,
NOULAC
STA 871+94 KFC E
13
A�ipys
74+24 6,0 LT AND 11-V
S 874+79 Q 00
ENDO SEGI
_STAS73,+64(25JD'LT
10 BEGIN TAPER END 9 Avr,*RAIIOR LTAND 30tL�
587441 FKDTAPER
40
-------- ------- ------------------------------- --- ---------------- ------------- -- ---
S973+86
Lw+LI ---
Fk
SR99 (S-LINEV 00 L
0 871+DO 872+00 875 00 0764cCo)
+
co
00
7
Uj UJI
s z ff7-SR99 (S-LINE)
:3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
jpoU S 73+S3 A'A
W S 875+2"
13
P
cl)
DUMKil,' 40 S874+09 1&5 R' 1)
13 OD END
U c
cn
v EGUE3%NM
__
BICYCLE
LCY
879U a RrAND R_D_
BEGtH APERO
PAC TEYACO
TRAVEL
CHANNELIZ
Ll =jl WIO�tEGEND r-ALLERY
WHITE TYPE 2L OR 211 ARROW PER WSDOT 87 SOLID ITIE GORE STRIPE PER WSDOT
sm PLAN H-5c (MATERIAL TYPE 4) STD PLAN HA (MATERIAL TYPE 2).
WHrrE TYPE VI ARROW PER CALTRANS 10 PAINTED DOUBLE YELLOW CENTER -STRIPE -
STD PLAN A24A (MATERIAL TYPE 4)
n1l YELLOW PAINT ON CURB.
YELLOW TVhoWAY LEIFT TURN STRIPE PER
WSDOT STD PLAN W3A {MATERIAL TYPE 2) 12 r DOTTED GORE STRIPE
(MATERIAL TYPE 2). 4 L
Fl] WHITE CROSS WALK STRIPES (MATERIAL r
TYPE 4), SEE DETAIL WHITE ROV SYMBOL PER WSDOT STD PLAN H-5c
1;4 J4 4�;x
TYPE 3). '4
WTIER(ALTYPI54) IAL
CH-1
18" WHITE STOP BAR WTER[AL TYPE 4) WHITE EDGE STRIPE (MATER I IFEW
4" WHITE LANE STRIPE 15 YELLOW EDGE STRIPE (MATERIAL TYPE 2).
Ll (MATERIAL TYPE 2)16 WHITE -OIC SYMBOL (MATERIAL TYPE 4), KEY MAP
-J
MEDIAN MOUNT GUIDEPOST, SEE DimTAIL� 0 20 40 6D
CH-1 WHITE TYPE 3L OR 3R ARROW PER WSDOT
WHITE DOTTED EXTENSION STRIPE STD PLAN H-5c (MATERIAL TYPE 4). Scaleto FeetI
14. (MATERIAL TYPE 2).
SR99 AH507V t"7310TI4710 S.3247H ST'. SWET 54 of 184
W,
�gCH-�6
DSGN M ROHILA BAR IS ONE INCH ON OF CHANNELIZATION AND
ORIGINAL DRAWING.
DATE MAR 2002
DR M ROHILA 001mamms"m r F SIGNING PLANS
CH2MHlLL a
;&M ow
I K L REID F NOT ONE INCH ON MD 149457
THIS SWEET. ADJUST
SCALES ACCORDINGLY-
kpVD NO. eraazr DATE w w*2445
RED IDATE REVISION F9,E NAME: 26faZOO6.41Y