99-101825R
JCIT�YOF
33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH
June 30, 1999
Mr. Fei Tang, P.E., SWM Engineer
City of Federal Way Public Works Department
33530 First Way South
Federal Way, WA 98023
Re: ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
Military Road South Drainage Improvements
29211 through 29276 Military Road South
Federal Way File Nos. SEP99-0013
Dear Mr. Tang:
(253) 661-4000
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210
The environmental checklist you have submitted has been reviewed by this office and other city
staff. We have determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact
on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to
comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of this determination is
enclosed.
A 14 day comment period is required by the SEPA Rules (WAC 197-11-340). A notice inviting
comments was published in the Federal Way News on June 34 1999 . The comment period
will end July 13, 1999 . At At the end of the comment period, the department will determine if the
Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) should be issued as proposed, withdrawn, or modified.
All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days following the comment deadline. The
appeal period will end July 27. 1999 . No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until
completion of the appeal period.
Our decision not to require an EIS does not mean that the license, permit, or approval you are
seeking from the city has been granted. Approval or denial of the proposal will be made by the
appropriate administrative or legislative body vested with that authority. The environmental
record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions will be imposed to reduce identified
environmental impacts as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated city policy.
Mr. Fei Tang
June 30, 1999
Page 2
After a final decision has been made on your proposal (i.e., after an approval or permit has been
issued or City Council action taken, as applicable), you may, but are not required to, publish a
Notice of Action as set forth in RCW 43.21 C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period
after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. A
copy of the Notice of Action form and copies of RCW 43.21C.080 and WAC 197-11-680
providing instructions for giving this notice are available from the Department of Community
Development Services.
The city is not responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. However, the city is responsible
for giving a notice (to parties of record) stating the date for commencing a judicial appeal
(including the SEPA portion of that appeal) if your proposal is one for which the city's action on
it has a specified time period within which any court appeals must be made.
If you need further assistance, please contact Tim McHarg, Contract Senior Planner, at (206)
297-2106, or Greg Fewins, Principal Planner, at (253) 661-4108.
Sincerely,
Stephen Clift , AICP
Director of Community Development Services
enc: DNS
Staff Report
L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENT\SEP99-00-13\DNSLTR. DOC
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
FINAL STAFF EVALUATION
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
MILITARY ROAD SOUTH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Federal Way File No. SEP99-0013
NOTE: The purpose of this Final Staff Evaluation is to provide technical staff evaluation of the
proposed action; supplement information contained in the environmental checklist and expanded
studies; provide technical information unavailable to the applicant; correct inaccurate information;
and recommend measures to the responsible official to mitigate identified environmental impacts.
Technical reports and attachments referenced herein and in the environmental checklist may not be
attached to all copies of this evaluation. Copies of reports, attachments, or other documents may be
reviewed and/or obtained by contacting the Department of Community Development Services, 33530
First Way South, Federal Way, Washington, 98003. Phone: (253) 664-4000.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION
The City of Federal Way Department of Public Works proposes to remove and replace 700 feet
of existing, but undersized, storm water conveyance pipe along Military Road South, and to re -
grade the drainage ditch at the terminal portion of the project to ensure a smooth flow. The
proposal involves the replacement of the existing storm water conveyance pipe ranging from 12
to 18 inches with 24 inch concrete pipes.
The Department of Public Works is in the process of implementing a city-wide surface water
control program. The goal is to manage storm water runoff which emanates from properties and
streets within the city and which eventually enters nearby streams. The department's on -going
surface water management program includes specific projects such as this proposed action, as
well as public education and source control programs, regular street and storm system
maintenance, and investigation of local surface water complaints. The proposed project is a
component of the implementation of the city-wide surface water control program.
The existing conveyance system along Military Road South has been found to be inadequate to
convey the existing and future storm water runoff from the basin. Flooding in this area has been
reported in the past. The proposed project would correct the drainage flooding problem.
LIST OF TECHNICAL REPORTS
The following technical information was submitted or incorporated by reference as part of the
development application:
❖ Environmental Checklist, revised June 14, 1999, prepared by Fei Tang, P.E., SWM
Engineer, Department of Public Works, City of Federal Way.
❖ Interoffice Memorandum to Greg Fewins, Principal Planner, from Fei Tang, P.E., SWM
Engineer, June 11, 1999, regarding Military Road South Drainage Improvements SEPA
Revision.
❖ Interoffice Memorandum to Deb Barker, Associate Planner, from Fei Tang, P.E., SWM
Engineer, June 8, 1999, regarding Military Road South Drainage Improvements SEPA
Determination.
❖ Military Road South Drainage Improvements Wetland Area Map, prepared by Fei Tang,
P.E., SWM Engineer.
❖ Survey and Improvements Plan, prepared by Earth Tech, revised June 14, 1999.
❖ Soil Conservation Survey, Soil Survey King County Area, Washington, 1973, U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map
2. Environmental Checklist
GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name: Military Road South Drainage Improvements
Applicant: Jeff Pratt, P.E., SWM Manager
Fei Tang, P.E., SWM Engineer
City of Federal Way
Department of Public Works
33530 First Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003
Military Road South Drainage Improvements Final Staff Evaluation Page 2 of 10
Location: Along the eastern and western sides of Military Road between South
292°1 Street and South 293' Street
Street Addresses: 29211 through 29276 Military Road South
Zoning: RM 3600 and 1800: Multi Family Residential
BN: Neighborhood Business
Comprehensive Plan
Designations: Multi Family Residential
Neighborhood Business
ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Following are staff responses to the elements of the attached environmental checklist indicating
whether or not city staff concurs with the applicant's response to the checklist item, or staff
clarification or amendment of the response.
A. BACKGROUND
1 - 3. Concur with the checklist. Please refer to the list of technical reports and
documents above.
4. The environmental checklist was prepared on April 30, 1999. The checklist was
subsequently amended on May 10, and June 14, 1999. All references to the checklist in this
staff report are to the checklist as amended, June 14, 1999.
5 - 10. Concur with the checklist.
11. Concur with the checklist. The existing stormwater conveyance system along Military
Road is capable of conveying the runoff of a 2-year, 24-hour storm event. This has been
found inadequate to convey the existing and future stormwater runoff from the drainage
basin. The portion of the flow that exceeds the conveyance capacity overflows on the road
surface and causes flooding.
After the construction of the proposed project, the system will be able to convey a 100-
year, 24-hour storm event. The proposed project would correct the drainage flooding
problem.
12. Concur with the checklist.
Military Road South Drainage Improvements Final Staff Evaluation Page 3 of 10
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
Earth
a-b. Concur with the checklist. The average grade of the proposed route is
approximately 2.5 percent, with a maximum slope of 5 percent.
c. Concur with the checklist. The underlying Alderwood gravelly sandy loam soil
series is moderately well drained. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight.
d. Concur with the checklist. The City of Federal Way Environmentally Sensitive
Areas Map does not reveal this site to be in a problem area relative to landslide, seismic
hazard, erosion, steep slope hazards, or 100-year flood plain.
e. Concur with the checklist. Approximately 600 cubic yards of soil will be excavated
and backfilled for the project. Minor regrading of the drainage ditch at the terminal
portion of the project may be necessary to ensure a smooth flow. As a result, erosion
potential exists.
The proposed project will increase the peak flow rate at the stormwater conveyance
system outfall. The potential of stream bank erosion associated with this increased peak
flow rate will be mitigated by incorporating energy dissipation techniques, such as
enlarged pipe and curved flow course, into the project design.
f-h. Concur with the checklist. Soil disturbing activities could result in erosion and
transport of sediment. Sand, silt, and soil damage aquatic habitat and are considered
pollutants. Land surface modifications are regulated by Federal Way City Code
(FWCC) Division 7 and the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM).
The applicant must submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
(TESC) for review and approval of the Director of Public Works prior to any soil
disturbing activities. Implementation of the TESC plan will prevent and/or minimize
erosion impacts during the construction phase of the project.
Since the project will not result in any net increase in impervious surface, post -
construction erosion impacts are not anticipated.
2. Air
a. Concur with the checklist. Short term air quality impacts will result during site
preparation and grading, building construction, and paving operations. Construction
activity contributes to carbon monoxide and particulate matter levels through the
operation of construction machinery, delivery equipment and materials, and worker
access to the site by automobile. These activities include emissions of hydrocarbons
Military Road South Drainage Improvements Final Staff Evaluation Page 4 of 10
and oxides of nitrogen, potentially elevating the level of photochemical oxidants, such
as ozone, in the ambient air. Long term impacts will not be increased by completion of
this proposal.
b-c. Concur with the checklist. The applicant has proposed to reduce air impacts by
watering exposed soil, covering all transport trucks, cleaning roads, managing
construction traffic, and requiring emission control devices on construction equipment.
The mitigative measures proposed are expected to adequately reduce impacts associated
with air. Compliance with local, state, and federal air quality standards provides
sufficient mitigation of these potential impacts from vehicle emissions.
3. Water
a. Surface
1. Concur with the checklist. No surface water bodies exist on the site. However,
a wetland is located approximately 150 feet to the east of the proposed project. The
storm water conveyed by the existing storm water system discharges to this
wetland. The proposed storm water conveyance system would continue to
discharge to this wetland.
Stream 19 (Bingaman Creek) is located approximately 450 feet to the
southeast of the proposed project. In overflow conditions, the wetland discharges
to Stream 19.
2. Concur with the checklist. The proposed project will be within 150 feet of the
wetland to the east. However, no portion of the proposed project will occur within
the 100 foot wetland setback area.
3. Concur with the checklist. Minor regrading of the drainage ditch at the
terminal portion of the project may be necessary to ensure a smooth flow.
However, the regrading would be located outside the 100 foot wetland setback
area.
The proposed project will increase the peak flow rate at the storm water
conveyance system outfall. The potential of stream bank erosion associated with
this increased peak flow rate will be mitigated by incorporating energy dissipation
techniques, such as enlarged pipe and curved flow course, into the project design.
4. The existing storm water conveyance system along Military Road is capable
of conveying the runoff of a 2-year, 24-hour storm event. This has been found
inadequate to convey the existing and future stormwater runoff from the drainage
basin. The portion of the flow that exceeds the conveyance capacity overflows on
the road surface, causes flooding, and eventually flows to the wetland to the east.
Military Road South Drainage Improvements Final Staff Evaluation Page 5 of 10
After the construction of the proposed project, the system will be able to
convey a 100-year, 24-hour storm event. The proposed project would correct the
drainage flooding problem. Since the total runoff volume to the wetland will not be
changed by the proposed project, impacts to the wetland hydrology are not
anticipated.
5-6. Concur with the checklist.
b. Ground
1. Concur with the checklist. The need for dewatering wells, as well as their
location and depth, are subject to the weather conditions during construction of the
project. It is unlikely that dewatering wells will be necessary if the project is
constructed during the summer as proposed.
2. Concur with the checklist.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water)
1. Concur with the checklist. Runoff in excess of the absorption capacity of the
sub -basin is collected by the proposed system. The storm water conveyed by the
existing storm water system discharges to the wetland to the east of the proposed
project. The proposed storm water conveyance system would continue to discharge
to this wetland. In overflow conditions, the wetland discharges to Stream 19.
2. Concur with the checklist. The proposal is for improvements to the existing
storm water conveyance system and will include low flow sediment controls to
improve water quality. Additionally, the proposal will include energy dissipation
techniques to minimize stream bank erosion and resulting sedimentation.
d. Concur with the checklist. The applicant must submit a TESC Plan for review and
approval of the Director of Public Works prior to any soil disturbing activities.
Implementation of the TESC Plan will prevent and/or minimize runoff impacts during
the construction phase of the project.
The proposal includes energy dissipation techniques, such as enlarged pipe and
curved flow course, into the project design to minimize the potential of stream bank
erosion associated with increased peak flow rate.
The Department of Public Works is in the process of implementing a city-wide
surface water control program. The goal is to manage storm water runoff which
emanates from properties and streets within the city and which eventually enters nearby
Military Road South Drainage Improvements Final Staff Evaluation Page 6 of 10
streams. The department's on -going surface water management program includes
specific projects such as this proposed action, as well as public education and source
control programs, regular street and storm system maintenance, and investigation of
local surface water complaints. The proposed project is a component of the
implementation of the city-wide surface water control program.
4. Plants:
a-d. Concur with the checklist. The applicant has proposed mitigate plant impacts by
replanting or replacing all vegetation removed as a result of construction activities. No
significant adverse plant impacts are anticipated. Therefore, no additional mitigation
measures are necessary.
5. Animals:
a-d. Concur with the checklist. The site is located within the Pacific Flyway, a
significant route for migratory waterfowl. However, no significant adverse wildlife
impacts are anticipated. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary.
6. Energy and Natural Resources:
a-c. Concur with the checklist. The applicant has proposed to reduce energy impacts by
limiting construction equipment idling, encouraging carpooling by construction
workers, locating staging areas in close proximity to the site, and phasing construction
and controlling traffic to limit idling vehicles. No significant adverse energy and natural
resource impacts are anticipated. Therefore, no additional mitigation measures are
necessary.
7. Environmental Health:
a. Environmental Health Hazards:
1-2. Concur with the checklist. The risk of environmental health hazards is always.
present during construction projects. The use of standard construction practices and
traffic control measures would greatly reduce the risk of an accident. The site plan
has been reviewed by fire and police personnel for adequacy of emergency access
and layout. All applicable state laws concerning workplace safety should be
followed on the proposed project site during construction.
b. Noise
1. The proposed route site is currently developed as a road and therefore
experiences noises associated with the operation of vehicles.
Military Road South Drainage Improvements Final Staff Evaluation
Page 7 of 10
2-3. Concur with the checklist. Noise levels will increase on a short term basis
during construction activity. No increase in noise levels will be generated as a
result of the completed project. Control measures include use of muffled
equipment, acoustic shielding, and required conformance with local noise
ordinances regulating hours of construction.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
a-1. Concur with the checklist. The majority of the development in the vicinity of the
proposal consists of multifamily residential dwellings and neighborhood businesses.
The site is located predominantly within the public right-of-way in the BN, RM1800,
and RM3600 zoning districts. The site has not been identified as being located within
any designated environmentally sensitive areas.
The proposal does not involve construction or demolition of structures. The
proposal will neither displace workers or residences; rather it is intended to provide
additional capacity for storm water conveyance pipes consistent with the city-wide
surface water control program.
If any portion of the project is located outside the public right-of-way, the
applicant shall be required to obtain construction and maintenance easements as
appropriate prior to the initiation of construction activities.
9. Housing:
a-c. Concur with the checklist. No significant adverse housing impacts are anticipated.
Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary.
10. Aesthetics:
a-c. Concur with the checklist. The applicant has proposed mitigate plant impacts by
replanting or replacing all vegetation removed as a result of construction activities. The
proposal involves improvements to the existing storm water conveyance system and
adverse aesthetics impacts are not anticipated.
11. Light and Glare:
a.-c. Concur with the checklist. The proposal will not produce light or glare. Therefore
no mitigative measures are proposed.
Military Road South Drainage Improvements Final Staff Evaluation Page 8 of 10
12. Recreation
a-c. Concur with the checklist. The proposed storm water conveyance system
improvements are not anticipated to generate adverse recreation impacts. Therefore, no
mitigation measures are necessary.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a-c. Concur with the checklist. No significant adverse historic and cultural preservation
impacts are anticipated. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary.
14. Transportation
a-g. Concur with the checklist. A right-of-way permit will be required prior to the
construction of the proposed storm water conveyance system improvements. If any
portion of the project is located outside the public right-of-way, the applicant shall be
required to obtain construction and maintenance easements as appropriate prior to the
initiation of construction activities.
The applicant has proposed to reduce transportation impacts by repaving excavated
portions of public right-of-way and replacing sidewalks and private driveways.
Implementation of a Traffic Control Plan will reduce impacts associated with
transportation during the construction period. No additional mitigative measures are
necessary.
15. Public Services
a-b. Concur with the checklist. The proposed project is a component of the
implementation of the city-wide surface water control program. Comments from the
fire and police departments do not indicate that any special emergency services will be
required.
16. Utilities
a-b. Concur with the checklist. Water and sewer service are not necessary for the
proposed storm water conveyance system improvements. However, there are existing
water and sewer facilities in the vicinity of the proposed project. Based on comments
provided by the Lakehaven Utility District, any required relocation of water or sewer
lines should be coordinated with the district as early in the process as possible. No
additional mitigative measures are necessary.
Military Road South Drainage Improvements Final Staff Evaluation Page 9 of 10
CONCLUSION
Based on staff analysis of the application, the completed SEPA checklist, and applicable city and
county regulations and policies, the proposal can be found to not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment.
The city reserves the right to review any further revisions or alterations to the site or the proposal
in order to determine the environmental significance or nonsignificance of the project at that
point in time.
Prepared by: Tim McHarg, Contract Senior Planner
Date: June 22, 1999
L:\PRMSYS\DOCUNMNT\SEP99 00,13\STAFEVAL.DOC
Military Road South Drainage Improvements Final Staff Evaluation Page 10 of 10
- • tion
George LeMasurier, being first duly sworn, on oath disposes and says that he is the Publisher of
The Mirror, a bi-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language
continually as a bi-weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and
during all of said time was printed in an office manintained at the aformentioned place of
publication of said newspaper.
That the annexed is a true copy of a Legal Notice by
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
L-053
as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each
week for a period of I consecutive week(s), commencing on the 30TH
day of JUNE , 19 99 , and ending on the 30TH day of JUNE
19 99 , both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers
during all of said period.
That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication in the sum of $_ 103.88 ,
which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65,16.090.
Subscribed to and sworn before the this 1ST day of JULY 19 99
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington.
Residing at Tacoma
S I
r
1414 SO.324TH STREET, SUITE B210, FEDERALWAY,WA 98003 ■ 253-925-5565 0 FAX:253-925-5750
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMEN-
TAL DETERMINATIOR OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE
Federal Way, Washington
MILITARY ROAD SOUTH DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS
Application No: SEP99-0013
The City of Federal Way has deter-
mined that the following project does not
have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An Environ-
mental Impact .Statement (EIS) is not
required under RGW 43.21 C.030(2)(c).
This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and
other information on file With the city.
Proposed Action: Remove and
replace 700 Feet of existing, but
undersized, storm water conveyance
pipe along Military Road South,
between 29211 and 29276 Military
Road South.
Applicant:
Fei Tang
City of Federal Way
33530 First Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253)661-4000
Location:
The eastern and western sides of
Military Road between South 292nd
Street and South 293rd Street. .
City Contact: Tim McHarg
Contract Senior Planner
(206) 297-2106
Further information regarding this -
action is available to the public upon. : _
request at the Federal Way Department;, -
of Community Development. Federal i
Way City Hall, 33530 First Way South,.
Federal Way, WA, 98003. This DNS is
issued under WAC 197-11-340(2).
Any person aggrieved by the city's
final determination may file an appeal
with the city by 5:00 p.m. on July 14,
1999.
LEGAL NO. FWM-053
Published, FedeOallfty Mid&
June 3.0, 1999
CITY OF
i
(206) 661-0
r 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6216210
AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION
i !A 5 hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the
laws of the State of Washington, that a:
❑ Notice of Land Use Application
❑ Notice of Determination of
Significance (DS)
❑ Notice of Determination of
Nonsignificance and Scoping Notice
Notice of Environmental
Determination of Nonsignificance
(SEPA, DNS)
❑ Notice of Environmental Mitigated
Determination of Nonsignificance
(SEPA, MDNS)
❑ Other
❑ Notice of Land Use Action
❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the
Hearing Examiner
❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public
Hearing
❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing
❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline
Management Permit
❑ Shoreline Management Permit
was mailed/faxed/posted to/at each of following addresses (see attached) on73ZLWE 30 1999.
Project Name NkL(
File Number(s)
Signature
AFFOW.FRM
REVISED 1/15/99
-RD
a)W.f c N iAG a
Pf2a V EM z-MT
Date 30 19 5
CITY OF
(253) 661-4000
33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
MILITARY ROAD SOUTH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Federal Way File No. SEP99-0013
Description of Proposal: The City of Federal Way Department of Public Works proposes to remove and replace 700 feet of
existing, but undersized, stormwater conveyance pipe along Military Road South, and to re -grade the drainage ditch at the
terminal portion of the project to ensure a smooth flow. The proposal involves the replacement of the existing stormwater
conveyance pipe ranging from 12 to 18 inches with 24 inch concrete pipes. The proposed project is a component of the
implementation of the city-wide surface water control program.
The existing conveyance system along Military Road South has been found to be inadequate to convey the existing and
future storm water runoff from the basin. Flooding in this area has been reported in the past. The proposed project would
correct the drainage flooding problem.
Proponent: City of Federal Way Department of Public Works Surface Water Management Division
Location: The proposed project is located along the eastern and western sides of Military Road between South 292°d Street
and South 293rd Street. The street addresses adjacent to the proposed project are 29211 through 29276 Military Road South.
Lead Agency: City of Federal Way
The responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decisions based upon impacts identified in
the environmental checklist, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, the final staff evaluation for this action, and other
municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the
Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.060.
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the
environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.032(2)(c). This decision was
made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of
issuance, pending a public comment period. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on July 13, 1999 .
Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person
aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal with the city within 14 days of the above comment deadline.
Appeal must be fled by 5:00 p.m. on July 27, 1999 .
Contact Persons:
Responsible Official:
Position/Title:
Address:
Tim McHarg, Contract Senior Planner, (206) 297-2106
Greg Fewins, Principal Planner, (253) 661-4108
Stephen Clifton, AICP
Director of Community Development Services
33530 First Way South, Fede
Date Issued:�q
JC—,J1� Signature:
L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENT\SEP99 00.13\DNS DOC
Jun-29-99 14:09 Madrona Planning and Deve 206 297 2301
P_20
T7—� -I-
-�-� -S 288thl lSt,_��� i--� i �1 fis-o '
S. J88.th-ST
AVALON
J PL -�HUPl
Ilst
—OT
ST��G
� � f 9,�, Off- f• �
2
1�� � L — — '— — pl NE
PROJECT 1, '.f'� r
LOCATION,esl e �p
(: SIR GARS +
1
! CANTEBURYLN i
JPL
�} ICE;
ST_t II� r I
N
Figure 1 VICINITY MAP
300 0 300 600 Feet
06/29/99 TUE 14-13 [TX/RX NO 5338]
US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS DEPT OF ECOLOGY
ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH ENVIRON REVIEW SECT LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST
PO BOX 3755 PO BOX 47703 PO BOX 4249
SEATTLE WA 98124 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063
FEDERAL WAY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
31617 - 1 STAVE S
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
JACK HOPKINS
SEATTLE PI
101 ELLIOTT AVE W
SEATTLE WA 98121
TAMMY BATEY
FEDERAL WAY MIRROR
720 S 333RD ST STE 203
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
FEI TANG
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
33530 FIRST WAY SOUTH
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
MARK FREELAND
WETLANDS OF WEST HYLEBOS
5150 SW 326TH PL
FEDERAL WAY WA 98023
CHRISTY TRUE
SEATTLE TIMES
PO BOX 70
SEATTLE WA 98111
BRAD BROBERG
SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL
PO BOX 130
KENT WA 98035-0130
BARBARA CLEMENTS
TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE
32050 - 23RD S
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
LEAH ROBINSON
FEDERAL WAY NEWS
32015 - 1ST AVE S
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
JOHN KIM
KOREA POST
25234 PACIFIC HWY S #COEFGH
KENT WA 98032-6539
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt Al Apt A2 Apt A3
Federal Way WA 98W3 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98M
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt A4 Apt A5 Apt A6
Federal Way WA 98W3 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98W3
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt A7 Apt A8 Apt A9
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt Al 0 Apt Al Apt Al 2
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt 131 Apt B2 Apt B3
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt B4 Apt B5 Apt B6
Federal Way WA 98W3 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt B7 Apt B8 Apt B9
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt B10 Apt B11 Apt B12
Federal Way WA 98W3 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt C1 Apt C2 Apt C3
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt C4 Apt C5 Apt C6
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98W3 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt C7 Apt C8 Apt C9
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98W3
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt C10 Apt C11 Apt C12
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt D1 Apt D2 Apt D3
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt D4 Apt D5 Apt D6
Federal Way WA 98W3 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt D7 Apt D8 Apt D9
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt D10 Apt DI Apt D12
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt E1 Apt E2 Apt E3
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt E4 Apt E5 Apt E6
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt E7 Apt E8 Apt E9
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt E10 Apt El Apt E12
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt Al ry
WA 98003 Apt J1 Apt J2
Federal Way Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt J3 Apt J4 Apt J5
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29t J6 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
p Apt J7 Apt J8
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt Apt J10 Apt J11
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt J12 Apt K1 Apt K2
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt K3 ry
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal WayWA 98M Apt K4 Apt KS
Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt K6 ry
Apt K7 Apt K8
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98W3 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt K9 Apt K10 Apt K11
Federal Way WA 98W3 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd.S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt K12 Apt L1 Apt L2
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt L3 Apt L4 Apt L5
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
Apt L6 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
p Apt L7 Apt L8
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98W3
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S 29225 Military Rd S
Apt L9 Apt L10 Apt L12
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29225 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S
Apt L12 #1 #2
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29401 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S
#4 #37
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
# 401 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S
#39 #40
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98W3 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
2299401 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S
#42 #43
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
1 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S
#45 #46
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98W3 Federal Way WA 98W3
Resident Resident Resident
29401 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S 29401 Military Rd S
#47 #48 ry
#49
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident Resident Resident
29211 Military Rd S 29215 Military Rd S 29276 Military Rd S
Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003
Resident
29414 Military Rd S
Federal Way WA 98003
000000 0000
z
042104 9086
Huwiwa Inc
9601 Gravelly Lake Dr SW
Tacoma Wa 138027
042104 9062
Karlen Jean C
28852 Military Rd S
Federal Way Wa 98003
042104 9172
Ableman Max William
3609 S 263rd St
Kent Wa 98032
042104 9183
Luhmann Lutz H
29260 Military Rd S
Federal Way Wa 98003
042104 9032
Verzani Edna Niemela
32712 33rd Ave SW
Federal Way Wa 98023
042104 9042
Funk Mark Sherry F Dba
2708 SW 3¢ th St 0
Federal ray Wa 98023
042104 9096
Phan Linh
4401 S 282nd St
Auburn Wa 98001
042104 9048
Public Hospital District No 1 Of Fling
Co -7
042104 9162
Karlen Jonathan D;Karen J
29208 Military Rd S
Federal Way Wa 98003
042�.04 9061 042104 9128
Rainier Mea5 L.L.0 Inch Richard D;Judy A Trst
1302 Puyallup St �� • ` 25804168th Ave SE
SumnerWa 98390� ' Kent Wa 98042
042104 9264 042104 9149
Rainier Meadows Llc Ganje Nora M
1302 Puyallup St 29250 Military Rd S
Sumner Wa 98390 Federal Way Wa 98003
042104 9174 042104 9063
Heath Joel H;Margaret D Midway Samoan Assembly Of God
2754 Santa Ynez St 27013 Pacific Hwy S # 224
Santa Ynez Ca 93460 Kent Wa 98032
042104 9082
Falconer Allan J;Linda J
29424 Military Rd S
Federal Way Wa 98003
042104 9042 042104 9048
Funk, Mark S;Sherry Public Hosp, Dist. #1 of Kin County 042104 9048
2708 SW 305 St 9 ty Public Hosp. Dist. #1 of King County
Federal Way, WA 98023
500 King County Admin. Bldg. 500 King County Admin. Bldg.
Seattle, WA 98104
Seattle, WA 98104
CITY OF
w
33530 1ST WAY SOUTH
(206) 661-4000
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210
AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION
1�-2z2Ehereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the
laws of the state of Wshington, that a:
❑ Notice of Land Use Application
❑ Notice of Determination of
Significance (DS)
❑ Notice of Determination of
Nonsignificance and Scoping Notice
ice of Environmental
Determination of Nonsignificance
(SEPA, DNS)
Ei Notice of Environmental Mitigated
Determination of Nonsignificance
(SEPA, MDNS)
❑ Other
❑ Notice of Land Use Action
❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the
Hearing Examiner
❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public
Hearing
❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing
❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline
Management Permit
n Shoreline Management Permit
was mail Ifaxed sted to/at each of following addresses (see attached) on 1999.
Project Name
File Numbers)
Signature,
C
AFFIDAVI.FRM
REVISED 1/7/99
Date 6�-- �S' r7 i
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ID:253-661-4048
TRANSrI I T CONF I RMRT I OPT! REPORT
JUN 25'99 13:06
NO.
RECEIVER
TRRNSMITTER
DRTE
DURATION
MODE
PAGES
RESULT
004
99255750
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
JUN 25'99 13:06
01'02
STD
02
OK
kT�YrB�--
(253) 661-4000
33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210
NOTICE
OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Federal Way, Washington
MILITARY ROAD SOUTH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Application No: SEP99-0013
The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the city.
Proposed Action: Remove and replace 700 feet of existing, but undersized, storm water conveyance
pipe along Military Road South, between 29211 and 29276 Military Road South.
Applicant: Fei Tang
City of Federal Way
33530 First Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253) 661-4000
Location: The eastern and western sides of Military Road between South 292"1 Street and
South 293`d Street
City Contact: Tim McHarg, Contract Senior Planner
(206) 297-2106
Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department
of Community Development, Federal Way City Hall, 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA, 98003. This
DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2).
Any person aggrieved by the city's final determination may file an appeal with the city by 5:00 p.m. on July,
1999.
Published in the Federal Way Mirror on June 30, 1999 .
LAPRMSYS\D0CUMENT\SEP99 00.MDNSN0TIC.D0C
C O V E R
FAX
S H E E T
To: Fax #:
From:, Phone
Subject:
Date: 1� - a5
Pages: �Z , including this cover sheet.
COMMENTS:
Mayor
Ron Gintz
City Manager
Kenneth E. Nyberg
Council Members
Jeanne Burbidge
Jack Dovey
Mary Gates
Linda Kochmar
Michael Park
Phil Watkins
City of Federal Way
33530 First Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003
253-661-4000
Fax: 253-661-4048
CITY OF
(206) 661-4000
FIN00'r 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210
July 26, 1999
Nora M. Ganje
29250 Military Road
Federal Way, WA 98003
RE: Military Road Drainage Improvements
Federal Way File No. SEP99-0013
Dear Ms. Ganje:
Thank you for the correspondence dated July 13, 1999, to Greg Fewins, Principal Planner,
regarding the Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) issued by the City of Federal Way for
the above referenced project on June 30, 1999.
We understand that the correspondence was prepared by your daughter. Our normal procedure
would be to respond directly to both you and your daughter. However, your daughter did not
provide a return address, and we are unable to make out her signature on the letter. Therefore,
we are only able to respond directly to you. We apologize for any inconvenience that this may
cause.
Your letter identified several important issues regarding the proposed Military Road stormwater
system improvements, including impacts to the wetland on your property_ This wetland is the
discharge point for the run-off collected and conveyed by the stormwater system.
We would like to take this opportunity to respond to the issues that you have identified.
The Department of Public Works is in the process of implementing a city-wide surface water
control program. The goal is to manage storini eater run-off which emanates from properties and
streets within the City and which eventually enters nearby streams. The Department's on -going
surface water management program includes specific projects such as this proposed action, as
well as public education and source control programs, regular street and storm system
maintenance, and investigation of local surface water complaints. The proposed project is a
component of the implementation of the city-wide surface water control program.
Stormwater run-off is the water that exceeds the absorption capacity of the underlying soils
during a storm event. Run-off naturally flows by gravity to -a low point in a basin, where it
collects. The wetland on your property is the low point of the drainage sub -basin in which it is
located. Therefore, the wetland is the natural collection point for stormwater run-off generated
in the drainage sub -basin. The run-off collected by the wetland is absorbed or evaporates. If the
Ms. Nora M. Cranje
RE: Military Road Drainage Improvements
July 26, 1999
Page 2
storage capacity of the wetland is exceeded, the additional run-off discharges to Stream 19
(Bingaman Creek), which is located to the southeast of the wetland.
In other words, with or without a stormwater conveyance system, the run-off generated during
storm events in the drainage sub -basin will eventually flow to the wetland on your property.
Without the stormwater system, the run-off would flood the road and adjacent properties as it
flowed naturally to the wetland. This flooding would result in significant property damage and
water pollution.
The stormwater system along Military Road collects and conveys the run-off from the drainage
sub -basin to the wetland, which is the natural collection point. By collecting and conveying the
run-off within pipes, the stormwater system prevents flooding and the resulting property damage
and water pollution.
The stormwater system does not increase the amount of run-off that is generated within the
drainage sub -basin or the amount of run-off that collects in the wetland. The stormwater system
does not collect additional run-off from other drainage sub -basins or discharge additional sources
of run-off to the wetland.
The existing stormwater system is capable of conveying the runoff of a 2-year, 24-hour storm
event. This has been found inadequate to convey the existing and future stormwater runoff from
the drainage basin. The portion of the flow that exceeds the capacity of the stormwater system
overflows on the road surface, causes flooding, and eventually flows to the wetland on your
property.
After the construction of the proposed project, the system will be able to convey a 100-year, 24-
hour storm event. The proposed project would correct the drainage flooding problem. The
proposed stormwater conveyance system would continue to discharge to the wetland on your
property. Since the project will not result in any net increase in impervious surface, it will not
result in additional volume of stormwater run-off. Since the total -runoff volume to the wetland
will not be changed by the proposed project, impacts to the wetland are not anticipated.
However, as the amount of impervious surface increases within the drainage sub -basin, the
absorption capacity will decrease. Therefore, as the amount of impervious surface increases, the
quantity of stormwater run-off will increase, because the water cannot be absorbed. Examples of
impervious surfaces include buildings, parking lots, driveways, roads, and sidewalks.
In order to mitigate the water quality and quantity impacts of additional stormwater run-off, the
City of Federal Way requires new development to meet the standards of the King County Storm
Water Design Manual. These standards require that the run-off generated on a project site be
collected, retained, and treated before it is discharged to the stormwater system. Therefore, it is
not anticipated that the size of the wetland will increase beyond its present size as a result of
additional run-off generated in the future within the drainage sub -basin.
Ms. Nora Nt Ganje
RE: Military Road Drainage Improvements
July 26, 1999
Page 3
The proposed project will increase. the peak flow rate at the stormwater conveyance system
outfall, where the run-off is discharged to the wetland. The potential of stream bank erosion
associated with this increased peak flow rate will be mitigated by incorporating energy
dissipation techniques, such as enlarged pipe and curved flow course, into the project design.
We hope that this addresses the issues that you have identified regarding the Military Road
Drainage Improvements project. Once again, thank you for your comments.
If you should have further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at
(206) 297-2106; Greg Fewins, Principal Planner, at (253) 6614108; or Fei Tang, Surface Water
Engineer, at (253) 6614015.
"ncei ,
Tim Mc *Se'
Contraclanner
cc: Greg Fewins, Principal Planner
Fei Tang, Surface Water Engineer
File
M-L-13-9Y TUE 1 I:1U RE/MAX ADVANTAGE FAX NO. b363438 P. U1
City of Federal Way
Greg Fewins
Principal Planner
Community Development Services
33530 1st Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6221
Fax (253) 661-4129
Dear Mr. Fewins
Subject: Federal Way File <SIF-P99-0-01
3
Your decision to dump additions drainage water will greatly affect my mothers property
(Nora Ganje). She has lived there sense July 1, 1966. On July 2nd, 1990 she wrote a letter
to Jim Driscoll Land Use Examiner, asking several question regarding the notice of
potential wetland on her property. Her property is now classified as over 1/2 wetlands
This is a man make situation'. The ditch "Ely drainage ditch was put in place to drain off
the over flow from Steel Lake." When Camelot was developed they even widen the ditch
and made it deeper. "No maintenance of this ditch has been done sense the City of Federal
Way took it over" But Federal Way gave the "Old Ely Drainage Ditch a ?♦'EW name they
now call it a CREEK and the surrounding area wetland. I thought God was the only one
capable of making a creep
I am enclosing a copy of the following documents for your information:
1. Copy of property description from 12/19/63 from the mortgage company handling
the lien.
2. • Copy of property description from June 24Th., 1966 Pioneer National Title
Company Legal description.
3. Copy of the plate map from the above title company.
4. Survey done in 9/10/66. (After the survey we put our horses on the back fenced
Portion.
As you can see the water problem was made by man. And adding more of man make water
problems will only make matters worse. And has greatly devalued the property. Is the
City planning to purchase this property for their water holding area'
Yours very truly
cc: Nora M. Ganje
07/13/99 TUE 17:15 [TX/RX NO 55231
J UL-1 J-J8 I ut 1 f ; 1 U Rt/rIHX HUMN 1 HUt PHA NU. !Djej4Jt5 r. u-1
Company has not s' eyed the premises described in
e sketch below is furs —shed without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in
Eating said premises and the Company assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein.
S'does not purport to show ALL highways, roads and easements adjoining or affecting
aid premises.
s
07/13/99 TUE 17:15 [TX/RX NO 55231
J UL-13-UU TUE 1 (; 11
KUMMA huM l HUL
VHA 11U. !Djb6q-Jb
r. uj
Pp
E_$0070 1066 at 8:30 a.m-
une 24,
SCHEDULE A
A1NIOU?JT 3 25, 000. 00
PREMIUM s 130.50 .
NSUREll
Joseph Ganje and Mora }I. Ganje, his wife.
TIT
LE TO THE ESTATE. LIEN OR INTEREST INSURED BY THIS POLICY IS VESTED IN
The named ijzsured.
ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST INSURED
Fe'
p1e estate.
si^1
G. DESCRIPT ION OF THE REAL ESTATE WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS POLICY IS ISSUED
toWnStLIV 21
. north
Cocluarunty Washington' described as f011owa:
That portion of the northeast quarter ❑f sectioa�,rS n Military
range k east, W.M., easterly right of y said
B'S,",ng at a paint on thethe
0 feet tnort�ast psra11e1htoithe goutsa fd
of
Road, saki point being 955- BB 21 " along
subdivisionh line
; thexice south ditch; tk►ence soutY�int of b ning and
to easterly arm of drainage20Q feet south of pposi- of West along
ditch to a point on a line thence north g8'21'� i ht Of
parallel vrith said south li.nel with0
par; line to a paint 17O feet east of the easterly r
said p Road; thence north 12"I'veat °211 n west 170
way margin of Alil.itarY 0 feet; thence north
to Point
easterly Fight of way margin 9 said right of way
feat, thence northweaterlY slang
of beginning.
07/13/99 TUE 17:15 (TX/RX NO 55231
JUt.-I�-Uu .fUL 1 (: 11 K1;/f1HX HllVHN'fffit PHA Hu, b6bd4-Jb
;gAnozq dlijnnjkEj N X-C= eqa sras�drr :aa) s42uso7ar se ins a[geuos�a a aaBeS}xocx azz :cd �- �r rso3rSssacu agy
pasajoaw ecu aXria,a srq-s puc
`;ono, 3noips m anp Apjv.jpmt q =u::q ,°ado Y aa8 vom nLp 7t 'days pasnoas ngasaq jgap :.aua atp uag7 'p7uc=ucn
uj;.7 q qul'uot= azp 3o duE p speasq r )o-xo '3gap p1m jo wauslpmr Aur in 7uam1(sd aga us xjns3'1, in u1
-puemap uo
sso2E2uauY ays Aq ajgeriedau aq pue um7:aa sad ['Q,3il24V nyz 3v ssa"Qm scaq pie asejwta srp Aq
k pampas aq lieCj° fPLaq uc sasc:2spuadra TV pzn 'gapaxq Wm Aug xoj a.tp5 >rxraq AP't-Js so ;q8u aagso dur �Su��ie+�
j ;nvsj7 �++ ' uac33 sopad Arm aa8e2srou, ;;44 uasp 'alueuano] kn0aioj 7q7 jo 6ue daaij as pe} rso$e9yoar
mPI°Ot{S
1 sasadsnci dioiur;ej xo jBaniEnauws ao3 .diiusl?auszd pasn ;aa se 6gaaaq p0?,Ugjxnw (;zadoad ayy aa8v°1:osu
ae{k Ul pajaa!pp pun passopua aq ni caiaz��n[ aouemsur jIt o3naa pie 'uepalwd s �a9e'71om ag7 so} 'aa�e€uow a;1
Aq passnbm aq Attu sr spopad pans soy puv siurowe guns u! sanitnsea pue spsuag lag7o pus put
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A-sT'a paspareg x75 pu73snogx aai;jxTg
Tszsporj' ssua[ ;e xoj aa2u�hmuz aq; o; 6soi3sfst]es sawaudxuo,
as ducdurao asuYrnmsc a[gnu°dvas au m Aq pamsur Almonuauoa pur sredas pOON m uaasayl sStnppnq a�P d 'j lT1A° Poe
't un�as s aa8e2s7on7 'rf7 8tstxtet3uzr ss uvqumau7 sag2o 17 Io aasj kv dwd aqs daa7 iF& 1Ag2ra1j pasrom 7gap so Ilauom
ay: u0dn sa a5e32101.a sage uodn puE uaararl7 sluam,vask<z pur saw jn�rj IF 13uan6ur[ap az03aq , iPd TCu1° pue uvaxaip
aj a9 aq o; ;swcja w 3UN !lupaq nwu =nnrdun xag7D x0 sam -1,am 's9u?PP-1kq IF majdwoD [jrra 'c* r d pies Palm— ou
srmsad `a3e2mtn Qni jo aauenujauw aei Swap •jp.sa datp zvgz :paragtur U"U sc am7m ag; 2egs pk,-e La7uisz }eas paq?asap
anc,gc aqa 3a Tfe 10 aldmja aa} ui ssaumo zq air ,fads ]rU :s:aaljv3 se r_StBuasII � y7pe auzuar 0o es08rEssorzs x[i.
•}oars duce 24223 sour aljs sr 'Impous u0 yed pae a70u aua vo 313aMLA-rd but ja xre3 s0 407ou prey }o ,Sue
uadn a dg j�anra7as snsa�ied s!P>� dr'u aaSp$:som alp `asau auo ueg3 asom Aq paonaprna s7 waupwgapu? aSeZ=Eu
� 3I •3oaaags 7sed Aur so 'Av.Zosd paSes=W ag] 2acnosdun s0 w Sucpp7: lur=ft 15UPE%OmU 'Swrrdas ;o asodmd
aq7 m; s108e'Iuom aqs o; aa3r2siow aq; Aq =lea13j pa°*oi a3 ATM ae A-2u0m TeuoR►pPe tp";o suamded aqp amoas oa
puz MU1110vx xp Aq Pin a:a sal;easag so a+aa ram .irars?mwd assna so sup 30 warn 2c17 m 8lnp o:a:n 'Cq sjzun
t oa'0�q`9j sa - - -- - - -- - - - ()Wok, ma 11-la Tamamli Xis aysnal mains
-- - - _ --_ .- - - - - - -- - - -- -- - -- - - 10 z°arufad:g7 alnDaa
0; 41,Era.T ay; 30 ;zud jxmvp�suoa ❑laaaq sagmd eql u-a� q sa 'aq flvq: yot,jA p 11e'.acrurz7d ppos ui pajle7suc aa�jaaxay
S° tif00 ]nau¢dinba pvv sn;e.leddr (1an]nq p Ra.Tnj.mj) ¢ujjevq puz Stnuo'llp—) i!v '.9apy8?j '3vrgwnjd jje
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - f paog Czurtoo
i•d39X: '-peca j4UnQD .To STsa�.say DaT41 uOTgaod }aqq ,%MORE !2a7-r�gaq
jo 3uzod ag4'01 1-aa3 !�Luor}aas aaJ.x2nb pTas jo auTT ggnoS e q 1
gIT7a TaTYexad ssag a2uatI4 :m0.z,Tasag3 4aa3 c j'4v l t pua 2utuur2aq To
4u=od 0144 jo Ion IV -Tod a v!,'4047P PT?S Bucle dTsagsaaq;noS aauOu:�
'.qa;p aaaurt xp --c =IV XTaa! s"Z a74 04 xaz3 29'990t 'unj4oas aa4xcnb
PIES Jo OUTT t{gnoS R-a g:?a -CaTTEz-0d Ises aonagz =3aa OGZ 4;aofz
aovagg !;Oaaaq:T xeuaoo ssaAggnoS aqg so [$•Tog 4aa3 SSL 'uo;auzuseM
'.C4un00 WUTX aT ' •F?'M'� V e8xsg lq{ AOK tZ dTgsu.xoZ It aaT3oas
jo aagsenb IsaagMaou a--t }o auTT :�saM allq ao :uTod E 17. 2trpupVee
r, U4
:;3eo,oa'mw; :71
,amp vaz}osd pae oaax —E r xj; g� sas{aa8°3 'ai3t76os sb3Ea»g 6Em QroSs3u0@ 3E7p ux�a7j3 aseara so ssuaat:[ TV
pur 'Q032Utq-1A 30 VMS '17=0 - NIX - m P°—= 'Amdoid r— pa mpp Sus"6 F) xp
I=5a=m 71p paff-=a;3e33-aq 'uOR-Odsoa a 'XNVR SONIAVS "IYf),IM KOL0XIH9VM oa 23%% nm 6g2raq /
s
a3ta stq 'HuIzgs-a1d 'k a0T_Zt PII8 H`JIZISaria '0 MORI 4¢10929P0RF 14 �
r{�
31.10
T7i.o> > ne 0n73 .
07/13/99 TUE 17:15 [TX/RX NO 55231
JUL-10—dd IUL 1 (.-10 KC/1.HA HI) VH1YIHlrC, CHA IYU, 0JOJ4Jd f . Uo
._ .. _., _. ;;{ - - o- �•. tom•• - a, d+�--.: •� .
•!1^�'.1`Ss; `#ice • i� ''•:S •..�: "�4. _'' �A. 'i
4,9
- :ram .A +_" ,- -�_" - -- `••-f'"'�yy' _ •`.,,_'+ �.. �:-�':: .a
-.i -'�i--�.'�.-•,. '�'(•�'-�� ;.'..•`��.yy a :41.,•4�-,ay.`d-. i'r:.� y�� �� � �-
- .y;;'. r~• �g '' fir- sx .. y!( - . Y.9x. •. V � '� i. - ... _ - :-, !!- • i•. 'i� '.�'r'1'• 'r•' 7•i-Yni+'. jl: _{ `. ••V '�-i'I�t!•r• !''-
:' ''• : •.
•Y ':1 ;..5 --�: ��:��• ~'•;31��iy y •- '.} r.%�+- wl�yr3'• •w
i 'Y""S,: ,r'..::.. G: r• i.:lga a.
' '� Y� i'' ' _ _ _.:M': } `•-w '�3-:-::: " ^ -w: :•Join•'.-„•^ � •.• r��J:✓�y'• �..
' -- �� �.;�=�{,* �+ � �Y r1 i.i.. .ti.: _x .v+'�,•��' s,.ft 11 ...>s,- t
�� _: F a. - •.X• i ' C' K'tw ! +•� 4 • iV�s:. ...' •'y ti.r �'" +�-f,�J;;r� } • - .
• ._ -. - --...'`'� - _ _ - i _.- j....1�... •-����r:1Cx'•-j• v�•+uf4„�Y+ti. l'r•.��F-:-rr .' �(.� 9
' - 3�.1..!Y: 11 4 �xi� �!�'--.Sr �.' ' ��:�'' +ram � •rl_': ; -i�4 . w ti c'i �1♦•'J.
• .y-'y,:..+.5:..+'':tea-Ivif'F..•.FA.::.: S_¢+- + yy.ir_.! -
_ _ _ _ • � ... • ..max '•'l�+Fh:yw.
Per*ice o� the . #i�i l 'Oee+ 4 2M,
�►
- -... _ ;:..-. _._. ..-.� •— _- .c_.• - ... .._ .-.._ _ -.._ .�_. __ram °•� ^— .. - .. r r
- . .. . - -""°�M�-sz.:rat- •-•�•ti•wr .y •x'.: - - :-w..r-...' ai ...
gin:. _ :.i .-_. .`':'• �•�;`;' - _ •• '}-•:..�': .. _ ��
_ 4 �.titi' ..n: • X- 7� • rs' •: •'' v`i,... -.i�: �'y �•cf:y?Ji .}',
•,iY 46
1:45> :1�.' � nti �� -- r" .�Y?'• `-big - '�}.c'va/.' i tif• 3'r' . 2,`:r�
:Ar=-�.. _,.� i , ••~ .. •���-�-. v-a �3•'C �'L`i�"�e ;:Ile- .. :r�^�.� .a::._,•r;::: :iv 7i :-'� fai..yr, a�~ . �..' P
^�.(?Fa•�«'_ - ' .�,;e . _ -�.'r. yy •:� y `�y']'. :�' � _ • � � �'`J
�T i,� %•r :dam. � '�- r .r.-•_ .:ia `�+iiyY�•4 C �.� _ �'. IF
.4 V etc`• - Stii".'r•-. `,s :'may t '+i', �•7s r-d..`
07/13/99 TUE 17:15 [TX/RX NO 55231
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
(Revised June 14,1999)
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental
agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An
environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable
significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to
provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to
reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide
whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Annlicants
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of
your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most
cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans
without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not
apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the
questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and land use
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental
agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a
period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help
describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this
checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably
related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Use of Checklist forNon-project Proposals:
Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, although questions may be answered "does not
apply". In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -project Actions (part D).
For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and
"property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,"
respectively.
1
A. BACKGROUND:
Name of proposed project, if applicable:
City of Federal Way Military Road South Drainage Improvements
2. Name of Applicant: City of Federal Way Department of Public Works
Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Applicant: Agent (if applicable):
City of Federal Way
Department of Public Works
33530 1st Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003
(253) 661-4015
Contact Person:
Primary Contact Person:
Mr. Fei Tang, PE
Secondary Contact Person:
Mr. Jeff Pratt, PE
4. Date checklist prepared: April 30, 1999
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way, Washington
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Construction is anticipated to occur during the summer of 1999.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to
or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
There are no plans for future activity directly associated with this project.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
The following reports are related to this proposed action and are incorporated into this
SEPA document by reference:
• U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1973. Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey
King County Area, Washington.
2
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of
other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
No other related applications are known to be pending for government approval at this
time.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if
known.
The approvals and permits anticipated for this project include:
• City of Federal Way Zoning Code Compliance or process approvals, grade and fill
permit, land surface modification permit and right-of-way construction permit.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. Several questions later in this checklist ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers
on this page.
The purpose of the project is to remove and replace 700 feet of existing, but undersized,
stormwater-conveyance pipe along Military Road, and to re -grade the drainage ditch at
the terminal portion of the project to the extent necessary for a smooth flow.
The existing conveyance system along Military Road was found inadequate to convey
the existing and future storm water runoff from the basin. Flooding has been reported in
the past. The project proposes to replace the existing stormwater-conveyance pipe
ranging from 12 inches to 18 inches with 24 inches concrete pipes. This project would
correct the drainage flooding problem.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should
submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or
detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The project area is located within the City of Federal Way. The project is generally
located in the north half quarter of Section 4, Township 21 N, Range 4 E. The site is
generally contained along Military Road between South 288th Street and Military Road
South, north and western boundary, and South 298`h Street and Camelot Drive, south and
eastern boundary. Figure 1 shows the vicinity and location of the project area.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS:
EARTH:
3
a. General description of the site underline one: flat, rolling, hilly, steep
slopes, mountainous, other
The topography of the project site slopes to the south and east in a mixed residential
and neighborhood business. The difference between the highest and lowest points along
the project alignment is 15 feet over distance approximately 600 feet , and the average
grade is approximately 2.5 percent.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Over the entire project alignment, the average slope is approximately 2.5 percent with a
maximum slope less than 5 percent.
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural
soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
According to the King County Soil Survey, the primary soil series in the general project
area is Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes (AgB), that is defined as:
Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes (AgB). This series is made up of
moderately well drained soils that have a weakly to strongly consolidated substratum at a
depth of 24 to 40 inches. The surface layer and subsoil are very dark brown, dark -
brown, and grayish -brown gravelly sandy loam about 27 inches thick. The substratum is
grayish -brown, weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till that extends to a
depth of 60 inches and more. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
There are no indications of unstable conditions along the project route
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Constructions for this project will be either in the right-of-way or in the easement
acquired by the City. Approximately 600 cubic yards of soil will be excavated and
backfilled for the construction of the storm drainage improvements (pipelines) along
Military Road between South 288th Street and South 298th Street.
Minor re -grading of the drainage ditch at the terminal portion of the project may be
necessary to streamline the drainage. The limit of the minor re -grading is showing in the
attached map.
C Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
0
The proposed excavation and backfill activities have the potential to cause limited
erosion during construction. Timing and phasing of construction, the amount of fill
removed, the effectiveness of erosion -control measures, and weather conditions would
influence the extent of this erosion potential.
The project may cause a flow velocity increase during a large storm event. The erosion
potential associated with the velocity increase will be mitigated by incorporating energy
dissipation measures at pipe outfall of the project.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
This project will not result in any net increase in impervious surfaces on the project site.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth
Construction is to be performed during dry periods (e.g., during summer months)
followed by immediate restoration and enhancement of vegetation, if applicable. An
erosion and sedimentation control plan (approved by the City) will be developed as part
of the final design to minimize impacts of erosion during construction. Measures would
include vegetative controls, structural controls such as fabric filter fences, gravel berms,
and other Best Management Practices (BMPs). Monitoring and maintenance of such
control measures would be conducted throughout project construction to ensure proper
performance.
2. AIR:
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if know.
A variety of construction activities associated with the project, if not properly mitigated,
would temporarily generate particulate with a diameter less than 10 microns (PM10) and
small amounts of carbon monoxide (CO). Emissions of PM10 and CO from construction
activities would be temporary in duration and small in quantity compared with existing
background levels from other sources such as automobiles.
Excavation activities by heavy equipment will generate dust from the site. Vehicles
leaving the site may deposit mud on public streets, which could then become a source of
dust after it dries.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
No off -site sources of emissions or odor would affect the proposal.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if
any:
Particulate emissions in the form of fugitive dust during construction activities are
regulated by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA). PSAPCA
regulations require best available control technology to control all emissions of fugitive
dust. These requirements further stipulate that fugitive dust from construction activities
shall not be injurious to human health, plants and animals, or property, and shall not
unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment of life and property. In addition, the
operation of a vehicle that deposits particulate matter on a paved, public highway is
prohibited.
Incorporating mitigation measures into construction specifications for the project would
reduce construction impacts to local air quality. Mitigation measures to control PM10,
deposition of particulate matter, and emissions of CO during construction could include
the following:
• Spraying exposed soil with water would reduce emissions of PM10 and
deposition of particulate matter.
■ Covering all trucks transporting materials would eliminate particulate
blowing off trucks during transportation. Wetting materials in trucks or
providing adequate freeboard (space from the top of the material to the top
of the truck ) would reduce PM10 and deposition of particulate during
transportation.
• Removing particulate matter deposited on paved, public roads would reduce
mud on area roadways.
• Routing and scheduling construction trucks to reduce traffic delays during
peak travel times would reduce secondary air quality impacts caused by
reduction of traffic speeds while waiting for construction trucks.
• Requiring appropriate emission control devices on all construction
equipment powered by gasoline or diesel fuel would reduce CO emissions in
vehicular exhaust. Using relatively new, well -maintained equipment would
reduce CO emissions.
3. WATER:
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands :
0
If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or
river it flows into.
There are no surface water bodies on or in the immediate vicinity of this
project. There is a major stream 500 feet south of the project site. The
stream flows into the Lower Green River Basin.
The existing storm drainage pipe that is to be replaced on Military Road
as part of the project discharges to a wetland about 200 feet to the east.
In overflow condition, the wetland discharges to Bingaman Creek.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Part of project is within 200 feet of the wetland on the east. The wetland
and its 100 feet setback area is shown on the attached map.
Currently the existing system is capable of conveying 2-year 24-hour
design storm. After the construction of the project, the system will be
able to convey a 100-year 24-hour design storm. With the existing
system, the portion of the flow that exceeds the conveyance capacity will
overflow on the road surface and will find its way to the wetland. Since
the total runoff volume to the wetland will not be changed by the project,
the project has no significant adverse impact on the wetland hydrology.
During the storm event that is larger than a 2-year 24-hour design storm,
the project will increase the peak flow rate at the pipe outfall. The
potential of stream bank erosion associated with this flow rate increase
during the large storm event will be mitigated by constructing energy
dissipater within the outfall structure or immediately outside of the
outfall.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Excavation activities in and along the pipeline route will not affect local
water bodies. The possible minor re -grading at the terminal portion of
the existing pipeline will not require filling or dredging within 100 feet
of wetland setback area.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No surface water withdrawals or diversions will be required as part of
this project.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the
site plan.
7
The proposed project does not lie within a 100-year floodplain.
Localized street flooding occurs along the project route, hence the storm
drainage pipe replacement is being proposed. However, the flooding is
not the result of surface water levels of a floodplain.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?
If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No discharges of waste materials into surface waters are anticipated as a
result of the construction of this project.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known.
During pipeline construction, temporary dewatering wells may be used
to lower shallow groundwater in this construction area to enable the
construction of the replacement pipeline during high ground water table.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic
tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial,
containing any toxic chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of
the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) is(are) expected
to serve.
The proposed project will not require the discharge of waste material to
groundwater from septic tanks or other systems.
C. Water Runoff (Including Storm Water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Runoff in excess of the soil/surface absorption capacity originates within
the sub -basin. The existing system is not adequately sized to handle
major storm runoff events. The proposed project consisting of pipe
enlargements will remedy existing and future inadequacies to the basin's
stormwater conveyance system.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
The quality of storm drainage from the local sub -basin is typical of a
residential/commercial area in that the major runoff components
emanate from streets, parking lots, and commercial operations yards.
L
This project will increase the system's capacity and includes low flow
sediment controls that will improve water quality.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
During the construction of the facilities proposed for this project, diversion of runoff
water will be provided where appropriate. The erosion control plan developed for this
project will address runoff control as well.
Federal Way's Department of Public Works is involved in implementing a citywide
surface water control program. The goal is to generally manage storm water runoff
which emanates from properties and streets within the City and which eventually enters
nearby streams. The Department's on -going surface water management program includes
specific projects such as this proposed action, as well as public education, regular street
sweeping and storm system cleaning, and investigation of local surface water complaints.
Source controls are promoted as part of this program, as well.
4. PLANTS:
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
b.
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, othen(Saplines)
X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other.
X shrubs.
X grass.
_pasture.
_crop or grain.
_wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other.
_water plants: water lily, eelgrass, and milfoil, other.
other types of vegetation.
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
The project site(s) are along Military Road mostly in the public right-of-way , any
vegetation that is removed will be shrubs, grass and small trees planted adjacent the
roadway and sidewalks.
All existing vegetation that is removed during construction will be replaced.
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site:
None are known to occur at or near the project area.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
0
Shoulder areas, embankments, slopes, in which vegetation is removed will be replanted
with grasses, trees, and shrubs as appropriate.
5. ANIMALS:
a. Lnderline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the
site or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, sont!hirds.
Mammals: deer, bear, and elk, beaver, other:
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, and shellfish.
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None are known to occur at or near the project area.
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
The project site is part of the Pacific Flyway migration route.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Does not apply
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES:
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Energy would be required for construction of drainage improvements, and would include
diesel and gasoline fuel used by construction vehicles and equipment, and by workers
accessing the site.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
The project would not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties.
10
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of
this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
Proposed measures to control energy impacts during construction would include the
following: Limiting idling of construction and employee vehicles; encouraging
carpooling or vanpooling of construction workers to and from the work site; locating
construction staging areas as close as possible to the site; and phasing construction and
designing efficient detours to limit idling traffic.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH:
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
The proposed project will be constructed near sanitary sewer, potable water and natural
gas pipelines (see -attached drawings). A survey of as -built utilities has been prepared
and areas where in -ground utilities cross the proposed stormwater pipeline improvements
measures shall be taken to ensure careful construction management practices will be
followed to minimize construction -related accidents or injuries.
There is not anticipated to be any potential for exposure to toxic or hazardous materials,
explosion risks, or other environmental health hazards associated with the construction
or operation of the project.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required:
Construction -related accidents or injuries may require response by local fire,
police, aid units, or ambulances.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None are necessary.
b. Noise:
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, and operation, other)?
There are no noise sources in the project area that would affect the proposed project.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, and operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come
from the site.
11
Construction activities would generate short-term noise during the construction period of
the project. Project construction would involve removing of paved surfaces and
repaving, excavation, pipeline placement activities, and replanting activities. The most
prevalent noise source at construction sites would be engine -powered equipment during
daylight operating hours. Local noise regulations set permissible levels for operation of
construction equipment. The regulations do not apply, however, to construction
equipment during daytime hours, when project activities would occur. Because trucks
would be present during most phases, noise from construction trucks usually would
affect more people. Maximum noise levels from construction equipment could range
from about 70 to 100 dBA at 50 feet and from 50 to 90 dBA at 200 feet. During
construction, noise levels could temporarily increase at sensitive receptors along some
sections of the pipeline route.
The final project would generate no significant noise impacts.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impact, if any:
To reduce construction noise at nearby receptors, the following construction measures
have been identified:
• Equipping engines of construction equipment with adequate mufflers, intake
silencers, and engine enclosures to reduce their noise emissions by 5 to 10
dBA
• Shielding noisy equipment with acoustic barriers to reduce noise levels
• Specifying the quietest equipment available to reduce noise emissions by 5
to 10 dBA
• Turning off construction equipment during prolonged periods of nonuse to
eliminate noise from construction equipment during those periods
• Requiring contractors to maintain all equipment and train operators to reduce
noise levels and increase efficiency of operation
• Limiting construction activities to between 7 AM and 8 PM Monday through
Saturday to eliminate construction noises during the more sensitive
nighttime hours and to comply with local noise regulations. No construction
is permitted on Sundays without the Community Development Director's
approval.
• Locating stationary equipment away from receiving properties to decrease
noise from that equipment relative to the increased distance
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE:
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
12
Multiple family residences and neighborhood businesses border the project area,
generally.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe:
The site is not known to have been used for agriculture.
C. Describe any structures on the site:
There are no structures that will be impacted by this project. Nearly the entire pipeline
route is within the paved public right-of-way.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No structures except for the stormwater pipes that are planned for replacement will be
removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The zoning designation in the area is Neighborhood Businesses (BN), Multifamily
Residential (RM 3600), and Multifamily Residential (RM 1800)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The current Federal Way Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is Neighborhood
Businesses, and Multifamily.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
This area is not within any shoreline area and so is not identified in the City's Shoreline
Management Plan.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify:
The area within which the project is located does not include any environmentally
sensitive areas. The discharge from the pipe of the project eventually flows into a
wetland.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
Not applicable.
13
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
Not applicable.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
No such measures are necessary.
9. HOUSING:
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
Not applicable.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
Not applicable-
C
. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
10. AESTHETICS:
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
All the proposed work involves construction below grade.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
No views would be altered or obstructed by this project.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
ILA]
Replacement vegetation will reduce aesthetic impacts which may result from the project.
11. LIGHT AND GLARE:
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
The project will generate no light or glare. All the proposed work involves construction
below grade.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
Not applicable.
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
No existing off -site sources of light or glare will affect this project.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
None are necessary.
12. RECREATION:
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
Not applicable.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No recreational impacts to the general area are anticipated.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None are necessary.
13. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION:
15
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe:
No historical or cultural resources are known to exist on or next to the site. Prior to any
construction, inquiries will be made into City records regarding the presence of any
known cultural resources.
b. Generally, describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
There are none known to exist on or next to the site.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None are necessary. If cultural artifacts or historic resources are uncovered during
construction, project work will be suspended. Appropriate authorities at City and State
levels will be notified and appropriate measures will be taken to protect these resources.
14. TRANSPORTATION:
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Regional access to the project area is via SR 99, S 288`h Street and Military Road South,
see figure 1.
There is no major cross street that directly intersects the Military Road within the project
area.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
The site is not currently served by public transit. The nearest transit stop is at the
intersection of Military Road South and South 2881h Street, approximately 1000 feet
from the project site.
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
No change in the current number of existing parking spaces will result from this project.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether pubUc or private):
16
The only roadwork anticipated with this project will involve repaving excavated portions
of right-of-way, replacing sidewalks and private driveways.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally describe:
Not applicable.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
Some local traffic delays and temporary rerouting may occur during the construction
phase of this project. However, no measurable impact on traffic will result from the
completed project.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Approved traffic control will be provided in order to minimize short-term traffic
congestion during construction.
15. PUBLIC SERVICES:
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe:
Storm water drainage systems require periodic maintenance by the Public Works
Department.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impact on public services, if
any:
None are necessary.
16. UTILITIES:
a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: storm
drainage system.
17
a. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing
the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the
immediate vicinity, which might be needed:
No utility services will be required by this project.
C. SIGNATURE:
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that
the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
OWNER/AGENT SIGNATURE:
--`f.-
DATE SUBMITTED: s// -> % 9 9
m
PROJECT
LOCAMON
PL
I
SIR GARS
�O
CANTEBURYLN
Figure 1 VICINITY MAP
300 0 300 600 Feet
M
M A D R O N A
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
651 NW 78th Street
Seattle, Washington 98117
Tel: (206) 297-2106
Fax: (206) 297-2301
email: mpds@nwlink.com
❑ Q Facsimile No. of Pages (incl. cover): 5 Fax #: (253) 661-4129
To: Tina Piety, Admistrative Assistant
City of Federal Way Community Development Department
Date: June 25, 1999
Re: Military Road Drainage Improvements SEPA Distribution List
Tina:
Please find attached a SEPA distribution list for the Military Road Drainage Improvements
project.
Give me a call if you have questions or comments.
Tim McHarg
The information in this message is privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use of the recipient named above (or
the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient.) If you received this in error, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message
in error, please notify us by telephone immediately, and return the original message to us at the above address via U.S. Postal
Service. We will, of course, be happy to reimburse you for any costs. Thank you.
��.P�e✓c CEP %9 --76)
FEMA
REGION 10 NTH DIV
130 - 228TH ST SW
BOTHELL WA 98021-9796
US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS
ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH
TO BOX 3755
SEATTLE WA 98124
EPA
DEPT OF ECOLOGY
ENVIRON REVIEW SECT MD-126
ENVIRON REVIEW SECT
1200 - 6TH AVE
PO BOX 47703
SEATTLE WA 98101
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703
DNR
SANDY MOODY
SEPA CENTER
DNR — FOREST RESOURCE DIV
PO BOX 47015
PO BOX 47016
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7016
WA STATE DEPT WILDLIFE
600 CAPITOL WAY N
OLYMPIA WA 98501-1091
TED MULLER
HABITAT PROGRAM MGR
REGION 4 OFFICE
16018 MILL CREEK BLVD
MILL CREEK WA 98012
PORT OF TACOMA
ENVIRONMENTAL DEPT
PO BOX 1837
TACOMA WA 98401-1837
FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
ECOLOGICAL SRV DIVSION
3204 GRIFFIN SE STE 102
OLYMPIA WA 98501
WDFW DEPT OF HEALTH
AIRDUSTRIAL CENTER BLDG 2
PO BOX 47820
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7820
SEPA RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL
KC WASTEWATER TREATMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL DIV M/S 81
821 SECOND AVE
SEATTLE WA 98104
MARK CAREY
LAND USE SVC — KCDDES
900 OAKESDALE AVE SW
RENTON WA 98055-1219
KC BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
810 THIRD AVE STE 608
SEATTLE WA 98104-1693
PORT OF SEATTLE
PO BOX 1209
SEATTLE WA 98111
SEPA RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL
KC TRANSIT CTR DIV
ENV PLAN & REAL EST M/S 122
821 SECOND AVE
SEATTLE WA 98104
SO KING COUNT
REG WATER AUTHORITY
13335 - 248TH PL
KENT WA 98042
KING CO DEPT OF PUBLIC WKS
SOLID WASTE DIVISION
400 YESLER WY #600
SEATTLE WA 98104-2637
JOE HENRY
NATURAL RESOURCES CVN SVC
935 POWELL AVE SW
RENTON WA 98055
WSDOT
ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
PO BOX 47331
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331
OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY &
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
PO BOX 48343
OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343
US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
510 DESMOND DR SE #102
LACEY WA 98503
PUGET SOUND AIR
POLLUTION CNTRL AGENCY
110 UNION ST STE 500
SEATTLE WA 98101-2038
PS REGIONAL COUNCIL
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT
1011 WESTERN AVE #500
SEATTLE WA 98104-1040
METRO - MS 120
ENVIR COMPLIANCE DIV
821 - 2ND AVE
SEATTLE WA 98104
KING CO PARKS DIVISION
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
2040 - 84TH ST SE
MERCER ISLAND WA 98040
SEATTLE/KING COUNTY
DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
1404 CENTRAL AVE S STE 101
KENT WA 98032
TRANSPORTATION PLAN SECT KING CO ROADS DIVISION GERI WALKER GEO INFO SPEC
976 KING CO ADMIN BLDG COUNTY ROADS ENGINEER FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIST
500 FOURTH AVE 500 FOURTH AVE RM 900 31405 - 18TH AVE S
SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA 98104 FEDERAL WAY WA 99003
- - -
FEDERAL WAY
LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST �,
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PO BOX 4249
PO BOX 3440
FEDERAL WAY WA 98063
FEDERAL WAY WA 98063
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUYALLUP INTERNATIONAL
PUYALLUP TRIBE
39015 - 172ND AVE SE
3702 MARINE VIEW DR NE
2002 E 28TH ST
AUBURN WA 98002
TACOMA WA 98422
TACOMA WA 98404
PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER PIERCE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT
2401 S 35TH ST 2401 S 35TH ST 3629 S "D" ST
TACOMA WA 98409-7460 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 TACOMA WA 98408
PIERCE COUNTY BOUNDARY PLANNING & CD DEPT
REVIEW BOARD AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT CITY OF AUBURN
2401 S 35TH ST 915 FOURTH NE 25 W MAIN
TACOMA WA 98409 AUBURN WA 98002 AUBURN WA 98001
CITY CLERK PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KENT CITY HALL
PACIFIC CITY HALL ALGONA CITY HALL PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 THIRD AVE SE 402 WARDE 220 FOURTH AVE S
PACIFIC WA 98047 ALGONA WA 98001 KENT WA 98032
CITY OF TACOMA - BLUS JOE ELTRICH CRAIG GIBSON
LAND USE ADMINISTRATOR TACOMA WATER DIVISION TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES
747 MARKET ST RM 345 PO BOX 11007 PO BOX 11007
TACOMA WA 98402-3769 TACOMA WA 98411 TACOMA WA 98411-0007
CITY OF LAKEWOOD TOWN OF MILTON CITY OF SEATAC
10510 GRAVELLY LK DR SW STE 206 1000 LAUREL 17900 INTL BLVD STE 401
LAKEWOOD WA 98499-5013 MILTON WA 98354 SEATAC WA 98188
CITY OF BURIEN
CITY OF DES MOINES CITY OF NORMANDY PARK CITY HALL
21650 11TH S 801 SW 174TH ST 415 SW 150TH ST
DES MOINES WA 98188 NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 BURIEN WA 98166-1957
TERRY LUKENS
BELLEVUE - COUNCIL OFFICE WATER DISTRICT #54 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT
PO BOX 90012 922 S 219TH ST PO BOX 3867
BELLEVUE WA 98009-9012 DES MOINES WA 98198-6392 KENT WA 98032-0367
MIDWAY SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #1 l 1 COVINGTON WATER DISTRICT
PO BOX 3487 27224 - 144TH AVE SE 18631 SE 300TH PL
KENT WA 98032 KENT WA 98042-9058 KENT WA 98042-9208
FEDERAL WAY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
31617-1STAVES
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
PAT PROUSE DENNIS LENSEGRAV FRANK H SWAN
US WEST PUGET SOUND ENERGY PUGET SOUND ENERGY
450 - 110TH NE RM 409 22828 - 68TH AVE S 3130 S 38TH ST TAC-ANX
BELLEVUE WA 98004 KENT WA 98032 TACOMA WA 98409
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMIN
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT - AJ
905 NE I ITH. AVE
PORTLAND OR 97232
DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES
GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE
521 WALL ST
SEATTLE WA 98121
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
OF SOUTH KING COUNTY
800 SW 152ND
SEATTLE WA 98166
WASHINGTON ENVIRO COUNCIL
615 - 2ND AVE STE 380
SEATTLE WA 98104-2245
SEATTLE MASTER BLDRS
DIR - LOCAL GOV'T AFFAIRS
2155 - 112TH AVE NE #100
BELLEVUE WA 98004
HERB POLLINGER
FW COMMUNITY COUNCIL
PO BOX 3684
FEDERAL WAY WA 98063
MARK FREELAND
WETLANDS OF WEST HYLEBOS '
44 5150 SW 326TH PL
y, FEDERAL WAY WA 98023
SAM PACE
SEA/KING CO ASSOC/REALTORS
3905 - 154TH AVE SE
BELLEVUE WA 98006-1747
MICHAEL FELDMAN
AVIATION PLANNING - SEATAC
PO BOX 68727
SEATTLE WA 98168-0727
BARBARA CLEMENTS ! �+ JACK HOPKINS y
WASH STATE CTED TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE SEATTLE PI
901 COLUMBIA ST SW 32050 - 23RD S 101 ELLIOTT AVE W
OLYMPIA WA 98504-8300 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 SEATTLE WA 98121
CHRISTY TRUE FFEDERAL
NSON TAMMY BATEY
SEATTLE TIMES AY NEWS 4 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR
PO BOX 70 IL
AVE S I 720 S 333RD ST STE 203
SEATTLE WA 981 I I-] AY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
BRAD BROBERG
SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL
PO BOX 130
KENT WA 98035-0130
KINGSGROVE HOA
2613 S 379TH PL
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
CRESTVIEW SHORECLUB ASSN
4817 SW 310TH
FEDERAL WAY WA 98023
F
ST
FIC HWY S #COEFGH
98032- 5539
TWIN LAKES HOA
3420 SW 320TH ST #28
FEDERAL WAY WA 98023
MHACC
% WILLIAM HICKS
29219 - 7TH PL S
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
WRITING RESOURCES
PO BOX 555
EDMONDS WA 98020
BROOKLAKE COMM CENTER
726 S 356TH
FEDERAL WAY WA 98023
MIRROR LK RESIDENTS ASSN
525 SW 312TH ST
FEDERAL WAY WA 98023
NORTH LAKE COMM CLUB WEST GREEN CONDO ASSN REDONDO COMMUNITY CLUB
33223 - 38TH AVE S 432 S 321 ST PL PO BOX 5118
AUBURN WA 98001 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 REDONDO WA 98054
STEEL LK RESIDENTS ASSN BARCLAY PLACE HOA BELMOR PARK HOA
2329 S 304TH ST 1034 SW 334 2101 S 324TH ST #331
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
BELLACARION WOODS HOA
35204 - 6TH AVE SW
FEDERAL WAY WA 98023
LAURELWOOD CMTY CLUB
2343 S 292ND ST
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
MEADOW PARK HOA
PO BOX 24081
FEDERAL WAY WA 98093-1081
BELLRIDGE TOWN HOMES HOA
1438 S 308TH LN
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
CAMPUS ESTATES HOA
34004 - 16TH AVE SW STE 200
FEDERAL WAY WA 98023
CAMPUS GLEN HOA
32806 - 6TH PL S
FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
MAR CHERI COMMUNITY CLUB
29904 - 2ND AVE SW
FEDERAL WAY WA 98023
interoffice
MEMORANDUM
To: Deb Barker, Associate Planner
From: Fei Tang, SWM Engineer F
Date: June 8, 1999
Subject: Military Road South Drainage Improvements - SEPA Determination
Following three issues/questions were raised during the DRC meeting for the referenced project
on May 27, 1999: (1) will the culvert across Military Road be replaced? (2) is the entire project
located within the public right-of-way? (3) the impact of the project on the downstream channel
and wetland. This memo is trying to clear up these issues/questions.
SWM has decided not to replace the culvert across Military Road South.
2. SWM is in the process of acquiring the survey data to determine the project location in
relation to public right-of-way. If part of the project is located outside of public right-of-
way, appropriate easement will be acquired by the City before the construction of the
project.
3. Currently the existing system is capable of conveying 2-year 24-hour design storm. After
the construction of the project, the system will be able to convey a 100-year 24-hour
design storm. With the existing system, the portion of the flow that exceeds the
conveyance capacity will overflow on the road surface and will find its way to the wetland.
Since the total runoff volume to the wetland will not be changed by the project, the project
has no impact on the wetland.
During the storm event that is larger than a 2-year 24-hour design storm, the project will
increase the peak flow rate at the pipe outfall. The potential of stream bank erosion
associated with this flow rate increase during the large storm event will be mitigated by
constructing energy dissipater within the outfall structure or immediately outside of the
outfall.
Hope this memo clarifies all the issues/questions. Please let me know if you have any more
concerns.
CC: Jeff Pratt,SWMManager
Marwan Salloum, SWM Project Engineer
Greg Fewins, Principal Planner
K:\FEIPROJ\PROJECT\MILITARY\MANAGE\SEPARESP.WPD
interoffice
MEMORANDUM
To: ;Greg ewins, Principal Planner
From: Fei Tang, SWM Engineer
Mateo June 11, 1999
Subject: Military Road South Drainage Improvements - SEPA Revision
This is to respond the letter from Deb Barker dated June 9, 1999 requesting additional
information for the SEPA Checklist for the referenced project.
A.10 - It is stated in the original SEPA Checklist that a right-of-way construction permit is
required. No change to the SEPA Checklist is needed.
B.1.e - The project will be either within the right-of-way or within the easement acquired
by the City. It has been decided that the culvert across Military Road South will not be
replaced. A new map is attached showing surveyed right-of-way and the revised project
limit. The change has also been incorporated into the revised SEPA Checklist.
B. IT - The project has been redesigned so that the culvert across Military Road will not be
replaced (see the attached plan). This change will create a smaller increase of flow I
velocity at the pipe outfall than the original design. The potential erosion associated with S
the flow velocity increase during a large storm event will be mitigated by incorporating f�a
energy dissipation measures within the outfall structure or immediately outside of the ever
outfall. The change has been incorporated into the revised SEPA Checklist. �
B.3.a.1 - It has been reconfirmed that the wetland is further away from the project site.
The project is not within 100-feet of a wetland (See the attached wetland map). Other
changes have been incorporated into the revised SEPA Checklist.
B.3.a.2 - It has been reconfirmed that the wetland is further away from the project site.
The project is not within 100-feet of a wetland setback area. The map showing the
wetland and its 100-foot setback area is attached (source from Sheldon and Associates
Wetland Reconnaissance Map). Other changes have been incorporated into the revised
SEPA Checklist.
B.3.a.3 - It has been reconfirmed that the wetland is further away from the project site.
The project is not within 100-feet of a wetland setback area. The changes have been
incorporated into the revised SEPA Checklist.
IV
/�arVOL —
gln `R r� A
Ae[lc st ve6
of ��
W
B.3.a.5 - The requested change has been incorporated into the revised SEPA Checklist.
B.3.b.1 - The need of the dewatering well, as well as its location and depth, are subject to
the weather condition during the construction. It is very unlikely that the dewatering well
will be needed if the project is constructed during the summer. No change to the SEPA
Checklist is needed for this item.
B.4.d - It has been reconfirmed that the wetland is further away from the project site. The
project is not within 100 feet of a wetland setback area, hence no change to the SEPA
Checklist is needed.
B.5.c - The requested change has been incorporated into the revised SEPA Checklist
B.7.a - The survey map is attached.
B.8.h - It has been reconfirmed that the wetland is further away from the project site. The
project is not within 100 feet of a wetland. Other changes have been incorporated into the
revised SEPA Checklist.
B.10.c - The change has been incorporated into the revised SEPA Checklist.
Hope this revision and clarification provide enough information for the formal SEPA application.
Please contact me at 661-4015 if you have any questions.
CC: Jeff Pratt
Marwan Salloum
K:\SWMMINORCIP\MILITARY\SEPALT2.WPD
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 13, 1999
TO Community Development Review Committee (CDRC) Members
Trent Ward, PW Development Services Manager (2 sets)
Lee Bailey, Lead Plans Examiner
Mary Young, Lakehaven Utility District
Greg Brozek, Federal Way Fire Department
Lizzie Zempke, Adolfson Associates
FROM: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 661-4103
PLEASE RESPOND BY: May 27, 1999
FILE NUMBER: SEP 99-0013 (SEPA only)
PROJECT NAME: Military Road Drainage Improvements
PROJECT ADDRESS: The westerly side of the right-of-way from 29211 Military Road
to 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: Remove and replace 700 feet of existing but undersized storm
water conveyance pipe along Military Road, and re -grad the
draiange ditch at the terminal portion of the project to the extent
necessary for a smooth flow.
PROJECT CONTACT: Fei Tang, SWM Engineer, Public Works Department
(253) 661-4015
SEPA: Required as more than 500 cubic yards of soil are being
excavated with the project. Also, a wetland is to the west and a
stream bisects the project. Please provide your SEPA related
comments.
Please respond: Is the application complete?
&Q il -0
04210491048
RER MUM
NM "9128
❑ B
04221 9061 yL
o � _
ED0421049264
L
H
0
��� III ❑ �
L
7 ��I.
� Q
21 4
C3
-- ----- -- --
A
En 1049102
LAdRtLWOOD VALLEY
.. . .. ... .. .. ... .7
- -------- 969MEWO-ME PARK
13
7�
0421049062
0421049172
049149
0421 9063
!kS
0421049032
*"052
4 � ;
t}w Ceti � •.'i� � •a''e'.i` .u'� a t.. .F� ,�. , `�c '�.<� % fi= '�hr �.,yrc..
�J�N. � f�; � y,' T:Tr ..a; �• .An+ -�'.. Sl�' 'i2:�., �5 ��
S }.
72fair � ;•i� �. • �;'��,,. ti a s;� "` �
���!•Y'y�_�,iy: �' tii r _ �� h is �;-'.'1 ; • e,T
ve• � ti i.�4 - 1
-ice ��� •_t•
_ � L
—s- � _ ■
:- ;:M1�s��;•_�'�,. - %tug sZ• a
'x• � � :•�� .. °'.,�� .A3: � rti
.>ry
'..� �:� �"` Y� may, ••�¢'s
r 1j'B
�To7 �'. � • � r�r .� . p
.1 Rul-47"
0421048048
I�—�
Z Xi• 01421 09 i
RAINIEAUfA{JQ1Y5s�'
APARTS. ;
E 9128i a
F
a421049061
Ea
0421D49264
r
r�
E!d 1049182
La �
m M f
_ - -
=RE�3
. F L-v =_ _— — - -
_ p
- - -- - - CO
21 4
- - O
�AURECW00U'VAC
- =
-------------
=+f081L FiUA!!E PARK
r.=
D421049172
0421049032
v V 082
0421049062
F-
1
Ad
0
Q
o millilm- W�-4
il
NP,
k
HIW
-'
Q
0
ZD
m
w
i
U
4R-
4%]
S
O
O
co
3ECEI QED BY
Y DEVaOPMENT DEP
MAY 10 1999
CV
I Hii B N
0421049048
O� [ 0 21 09 �` 's iS
RA
APARTS.
"9128
D �; -:
F
1�2ID49061
F III ED
Cf)
0421D49264
L
H CZ,3
[! 1049182
F, kqhqm�ww,
A w! �
s ,
LAURELWOOD VALLEY
MOBILE HOME PARK
0421049062
0421049172
cl
0421 0083
w
0421049032
04 "082
60 \
'JM
?K RIM
)LE 0
REL WOOD
th ST
7
RM 1800 C/L STREAM F+, \CAMELOT MOBILE HOME PARK
io T9N0. rah-- ` \ RM 3600
TRACT A
(STREAM BUFFER)
19011.89. SF Tkx LOT
0.436 ACRES \ 042104-9
r ♦ � r . . � r - r 7f 7f \ \
i i r r
EXISTING SAN SEWER AND ES TO BE RETAINED �i. \ 1+00.00
RS5,
TRACT E.
(STORM DRAINAGE) p]d \
1805.81 SF ��� �a � TRACT "C" \ \
0.041 ACRES `'� (USABLE OPEN SPACE) / \ ` \ 04 104
12246.75 SF.
` ` \
0.281 ACRES / \
0 \ \
o�
j 8917.08 SF \ o ��� / eX 9 705.44 SF ��
/ / o� s \
0.205 ACRES / ��° �`' 0.223 ACRF�S
5' DRAINAGE ESM'T
c14 m
J,)
to —/
'�Uy0
�ep IP44 tied
�4�DATE:
p,rzcr
TO
I;-Izo�9
No i&v�
eD X"o S -C, 0
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 'T
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
May 13, 1999
Community Development Review Committee (CDRC) Members
Trent Ward, PW Development Services Manager (2 sets)
Lee Bailey, Lead Plans Examiner
Mary Young, Lakehaven Utility District
Greg Brozek, Federal Way Fire Department
Lizzie Zempke, Adolfson Associates
FROM: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 661-4103
PLEASE RESPOND BY: May 27, 1999
FILE NUMBER: SEP 99-0013 (SEPA only)
PROJECT NAME: Military Road Drainage Improvements
PROJECT ADDRESS: The westerly side of the right-of-way from 29211 Military Road
to 29276 Military Road South, Federal Way
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: Remove and replace 700 feet of existing but undersized storm
water conveyance pipe along Military Road, and re -grad the
draiange ditch at the terminal portion of the project to the extent
necessary for a smooth flow.
PROJECT CONTACT: Fei Tang, SWM Engineer, Public Works Department
(253) 661-4015
SEPA: Required as more than 500 cubic yards of soil are being
excavated with the project. Also, a wetland is to the west and a
stream bisects the project. Please provide your SEPA related
comments.
Please respond: Is the application complete?
CITY OF�
33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH
June 9, 1999
Mr. Fei Tang, SWM Engineer
Public Works Department
City of Federal Way
33530 1st Way South
Federal Way, WA 98023
RE: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED, SEP 99-0013
MILITARY ROAD STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Dear Mr. Tang:
FILE
(253) 661-4000
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210
This is a request for additional information for the Military Road Drainage Improvements State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) application. The application was submitted on May 10, 1999.
As stated at the May 27, 1999 Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting, additional information
and clarification, as noted below, must be provided before the SEPA determination can be issued. These
comments reflect the original application. Your June 8, 1999 memorandum has not been reviewed at this
time, and is not reflected in the requests for additional information.
SEPA Checklist — The checklist must be revised to reference the following information:
A.10 - Revise the checklist to state that in addition to the SEPA process, a right of way permit is
required for work in the right of way.
B.1.e - Are there any portions of the project that are not in the right of way? If so, depict the
privately owned sections on a map, and indicate whether easements will be obtained. In addition,
indicate the method preferred to cross Military Road South with the project; (ie: cut and cover,
boring, etc). List approximate quantities of grading and filling for each method.
B. Lf - Revise the checklist to add that erosion at the terminal portion of the project may occur,
and the methods proposed to mitigate erosion impacts.
B.3.a.1 - Revise the checklist to state that there is a wetland within 100 feet of the subject site, and
a major stream 500 feet south of the subject site. The stream flows into the Lower Green Basin.
B.3.a.2 - Revise the checklist to state that in addition to terminal portion of the work being
performed within 100 feet of the wetland, pipe replacement will occur within 200 feet of the
wetland. Provide statements regarding potential adverse environmental impacts to the regulated
wetland and wetland setback from the project, including hydraulic impacts, volume impacts,
erosion potential and potential impacts to other properties. List mitigation measures to be
implemented to ensure that the wetland and setback areas are not adversely impacted. This
information must be provided by a qualified expert, and must address the requirements of Federal
Way City Code (FWCC) section 22-1359(b).
Provide a map of the project site showing the regulated wetland edge as detailed in the Sheldon
Military Road Storm Drainage Improvements
June 9, 1999
Page 2
aid_AS,snQiaWs Wetland Reconnais,5,n,cr, Map, the 100-foot setback from the wetland, and the
project area, including pipe replacement area and terminal portion. Indicate where improvements
are proposed on public and private property.
B.3.a.3 - Revise the checklist to add that the minor regrading at the terminal portion of the project
site will be within 100 feet of the regulated wetland setback area.
B.3.a.5 - Revise the checklist to state that localized street flooding occurs along the project route,
hence the storm drainage pipe replacement is being propesed. However, the flooding is not the
result of surface water levels or a floodplain.
B.3.b.1 - Do you know how deep the wells would be and where they would be located?
B.4.d - A qualified expert must provide comments on the appropriate replacement vegetation for
the disturbed areas of wetland setback area.
B.5.c - Revise the checklist to state that the site is part of the Pacific Flyway migration route.
B.7.a - Provide a copy of the survey of the project area.
B.S.h - Revise the checklist to state that the terminal portion of the project is within the 100 foot
wetland setback area associated with an environmentally sensitive area, and that discharge from
the pipe eventually flows into an environmentally sensitive area.
B.10. c - Revise the checklist to state that replacement vegetation will reduce aesthetic impacts
which may result from the project.
After receipt of the requested information noted above, the department will notify you whether additional
information, if any, is still needed. It is important to note that the department cannot begin processing your
formal application until all items are submitted.
Please contact me at (253) 661-4103 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ig ,
Deb Barker
Associate Planner
c: FWCC section 22-1359
i:\sepafile\miltryrd\stopclok.001
R-8
9
a 'S 'Id HIOZ
Id HIRZ
C3
co "0
w -VIP
T CIS
C4 It
C2
cm
co
cm
V3
AX
. . .... ...
co
N
I
co
C; LxJ
ac I L 4-
LU
c3
c3
eq
ca 9D
c4 — c4
P7
00
C2
�E
4m
qm
EC4
Y
F-I
LU
BCD
rlD
9 C3 ;Liz
co
71M rr
0 CD
VM
o C',
r4 C2
co
C-4
pwmo
7
L
C2 ; 7L
s El c==
Li 0 9
Li
L �-j
C%l C7
C93
L%l
C-i
I NUNN
fh
FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT
31617 1st Avenue South
Federal Way, Washington 98003-5201
May 27, 1999
To: Community Development Review Committee
RE: Military Rd. Drainage Imp./SEP99-0013/Barker
The Fire Marshal's Office has no comments pertaining to this
project.
Respectfully Submitted,
'� g
Greg ozek
Fire arshal's Office
Phone: (253) 839-6234 or (253) 927-3118 E-mail: infogfederalwayfire.org Fax: (253) 529-7206
An Equal Opportunity Employer
LAIEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
316271st Avenue South ♦ P. O. Box 4249 ♦ Federal Way, WA 98063
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TECHNICAL REVIEW COAEVHTTEE
AGENDA OF: May 27, 1999
ATTN: Ms. Deb Barker
Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 3 - Military Road Drainage Improvements
SEP99-0013
CONEVIENTS:
There are existing water and sewer facilities in the vicinity of the proposed improvements (see attached copies of the
District's facilities maps). Any water or sewer relocation work necessary should be coordinated with the District as
early in the process as possible.
c: Bert Ross, P.E., Water Operations & Engineering Manager (253-946-5402)
Im
Mary Yc�ng
Development Services eupervisor
Direct Line: (253) 946-5400 FAX: (253) 529-4081
E-mail: myoung@lakehaven.org
Date: 5' 7b 2
I f k n
{� I• S. 288TH ST, p a
I I 36' �p 24 2
S 4
i 2 1 .�y vi ra
,a, 3� 'n.l. I 2c
S. 68T P 5 ? TR
7 + 72 ' 73 74
1— 2� 36' _I _� Isa•-Co.l prc—__�-- $.AL 8 - r YR. 3 17
I {
5,
I'°
"A EtO
- O ^S AO 8"X6'• •� r,� �11 e7'5 �gg
eue®''� -
r L lvyy�� (m.o. z-
66
�}' TRhCT B
64- I YRo I
t---
,_ -
•a, � � 4i 56 d9 4
27' + p�.• 57' ` 3.p4 15 63 a --
1 1 s 1 l 42 AO 100 I' 48 li
is 62 :60 59
I,
m j i S. 290TH ST 57 8- — - — - — -
9 7 5 4
a- L tt 119 I 18 1j4i�
art i ; 54
o.i. oL
s•-xo.� 1 7' FROM EDGE 19 �55
�,56 '57 5 6 N it
J. 21
- ,/2- PVMT. I f .y
I d ' ON p 2U•2.2-1/z l 2 I 20 a 1551 I 50 I F=- I _
21 S3� 52 i� 24I2
I d t ----- _
a S. 291 ST ST. 22 43 7 i
+ 1 11 _ --'-� J
1 _ 39 r� O 1 42 �f
� 125'-E'D.I. 175--6"D.I. 12 23 j�7'fj i
I ,
j w 1I o ^m 37 l{ 1!S n +I ' 13p 41
APPROX LOCATION 24
S'Y WD 64 WELL #3 1
(ABANDONED36 �35 34
3"B.O. 8'Gfj
+ S 33so3237 i-
J
- — — -� — — --- \'t S 29 ND ST.
48 S6 42 26 i 27 i 28 i 29 i 30 ; 31 $RACE ' TR A
RAINIER MEADOWS
OI,D. 67
1 B, I.D. 87rco.>
�5 61 1 •; /.
3•-rroi
RAINIER MEADOWS 2
X 6'L8 �Ts 8"D.I. I . 89 6&
14 32'-a..DI-10 _ry - -- — --- — ----------
IY c
42 142
1 + 288TH ST. Y
1
5 4
a 7 — -----` S. ss P
+� 30 I r' 7 7274
t _ 11 71
liP } 9 69 68 III
10 r
,6715
65•• _
2 I �+14 fZ j 64 f = f r
j a 42 53.14 f 5 7-- 63 58 II 49
6 30 42 ��-+-��- .1 d8
i C RC CIO) [D 1
I I 17 2
f S. 290TH ST —
1 �- - -
1 f 119 �18
64
54 I
j.1 19 } .l555657 ..' 520
51 0 a
-'--; 21 535Z
1 I ( S. 291 ST ST.
r I� -
I t 22, 43
1 f _L- k
2.1
w T� (�j 24 38 _ 1
�%39 140 ' 41
4 is I -- i �L3
t � � f 25 37 i 36 i35 i 3432
33
37 }
—.. z__— �� ST.
26 y
4 4z 86 O O 27 28 29 30 i 31 TRACT _ 7F
A
RAINIER MEADOWS - 142 �._,_.—._� •�__:_.�
1091
1 J�
r
17 r
PRIVATE Iff
EAD11� ! \
49 64 \ 51\ ` 1 1•\+
SI!,WEIR I11,ID BOUNDARY #7
�1
1 rf
CFTY OF
* ED
A'>r&STER LAND USE APPLICATION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAI]�,p+,&TMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Q Q 1999 (253) 661-4000 — Fax (253) 661-4129
www.ci.federal-way.wa.us
APPLICATION NO , Date
Project Name � &-d 2Qq 7d1 !,A t A
Property Address/Location /0%l/�W 191a Sa Parcel Number(s)
Z S` MZ70' G Mg.a t t f'b 2-9a .7 / r
Name: of can
Agent (If Different than Applicant)
Name:
Owner
Name:
Address:
Address:
Address:
3js3 o isf l✓J S
W fl 1Ao e3
Phone: (.xJ3 ),r1JI - e / S'
Phone: ( )
Phone: ( )
Fax: ( Zr)) f 6 / — o *,�F
Fax: ( )
Fax: ( )
Email: f� .,,,,,Email:
Email:
Signature:�
Signature:
Signature:
Zoning Designation Comp Plan Designation •"' Rwwfoj, r '
Project Description & w.V� Anot _, sal . �i.� to .',+r �� � zc,�x •r•�Cy �
(/u+ CCfiI�1I r ►h JlLdGB/lO6NKI }��/!^ A' �'ri* i 7 .
Uniform Building Code (UBC) Construction Type (UBC) Occupancy Type
Type of Permit Required:
SEPA Checklist Notice Mailed Sign Board
(Refer to Development Submittal Requirements Handout)
Annexation R R
Binding Site Plan R R R
Boundary Line Adjustment
Comp Plan/Rezone
Land Surface Modification
_ Lot Line Elimination
Preapplication Conference
Process I (Director's Approval)
Process II (Site Plan Review)
Process III (Project Approval)
Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone)
Process VI
SEPA Only
Shoreline
Variance
Conditional Use
Short Subdivision
Subdivision
Variance
MASI:ALA FRh1
Rims a 2122/99 Fr
R R
R R
R* R
R R R
R Rx2 R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
*
R
4
R
R
R
R*
R
R
R = Required
* = Optional by City
-2q,W-1 l M" Ic �Sr/
From: Greg Fewins
To: FEIT
Subj acts Military Road South Drainage Improvements; SEP99-0013
I have reviewed your proposed changes to relocate the 30" pipe downstream of
CB #2 to the location of the existing 120 pipe. I concur with your assessment
that impacts will be equal or less than the original proposed action. As a
result, no further environmental analysis for this modification to the
proposed action will be required. I have placed a note in permit plan file
number SEP99-0013 and in the file reflecting this proposed change and
decision.
CITY OF T
To: Greg Fewins, Principal Planner
From: Fei Tang, SWM Engineer
Date: September 30, 1999
Subject: Military Road South Drainage Improvements
Change of Design
The design of the referenced project has been changed due to the fact that the City is unable to
obtain the easement necessary to construct the last section of the proposed stormwater drainage
pipe. The detail of the change is explained in the attached plan. This change will eliminate the
construction of the proposed pipe system from the down stream of CB #2. Instead, the existing
12-inch pipe downstream of CB #2 will be replaced with a 30-inch pipe at approximately the same
location and same length. Please advise us on how the change will affect the SEPA approval for
the project.
Since this change in fact maintains the same drainage path as the existing drainage system, and the
size of the proposed pipe after the change is the same as what was proposed originally, the impact
of the project on the nearby wetland after this change should be equal or less than the impact
before the change.
Please call me at x4015 if you have any questions.
CC: Jeff Pratt, S WM Manager
Pat Richardson, Assistant City Attorney
Project File
Day File
K:\SWMMINORCIP\MILITARY\SEAPChange.wpd
CB#3
4�3
3 IE 418-40
6
CQ4
24'M
+ --7— �i — ITto 7—
CMC ROAD SUR"FACE R
ci
MILITARY ROAD: SOUTH
Aj$Wjl%61�X"rA-
ut
IE 412,
20 0 20 40
Pid SCALE iN FEE7
cp
.SAME CB
. .
...... ........ .......... ............... ............. ..............
. . .
. . . . . . . . . . �j
0
. . .. . . . . . . .
1. : . . : . . . .
70: Vt
430 . . . . . . . . . ... `0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C4 'o
..........
m 0
Lf) Ln w-K C14IN
Ld x
L(3 C�l W LL,
-WntO
ti, cy N o . . . . . . . < Ld
+ 't C) C)
Y4 ..............
425 ' +� N. ..........
Ld LLJ
, W
Ld -E LJ Ld
420 .........................
-,T 9"So-
m- - - - - - -- E
S�0.020
'4'RCP CL"�.
. . . . . . . LF 2
415 .......... .. ............ ....... ------- -50LF "SS IOLF F i I EXIS
EXIST' S"SS 30"RCP CLIII 30"RCP• CLPI
S=0.0170
410 . ..... .......
... . .................. ......
-i.
co
c-c'
LJ1 Lo Lr-,,Ll
c�
x x
x 'I-
uj 5
Al
...... . . .... I �E , . ........ ... ......... ...... . .
Ln! c) of
V)
cn Ln
uj
.......... ......... ......... ........
.......... .......
..... ...... ..... . .. ................. 12+00
10+00 11+00
NOW- SCALE *1
cm or VERT. SCALE
m
41CD-4
CD C) �< o
�co D
C,_ oCD z
� D m
c
00
o
N �l V
toU m O
W — .
c C4
I W
N W
N zF m
D=
00
0 N
O �
O
W N
O
(,W m `
0) m N
O o
UD
WC4
S �
� o v
13 T
W
00
rn
ND:
N
N N
EX)
0
O
p
m
M
Zm
o
M=
I
�41
m •A
C)
>
_
N Co
m
Z O
p= ➢ cc
➢
_�
Z O
o
p
m c�
o
r
m
o
X
000
mo
rn
i
x�-
J
Sze
dg
m-
5S
} d 013 1
A
7
0
co �
o�
o=
;-
p=
(n=
zo
D
00
z
m p
-1
m
X
D J A f�j �iPl cJ
-z-�
NMd1
_ 2 �
N °d
Szi' r� ' yt Id•P1<�°1S
_ss
yZ4 J— m N / r1Md1 31c'c'a OS + cu
£Z4 Z SS
0)
4p I N Iss
� ,
ss
Od
mac'✓ _ _ - - � � ` - ^ +���9
OO
,8ns °d0� °N 3Od3
m
O�
06,E
h
�� •4 ,q b
� V
r
M
Z
.,Tl 0)r-
m r=
:< zF
.A. rri
O Z D ITI
o m z — co
•
+sr�✓
¢
i
m
O
y
X
I
N
0
i
O
r
I
X
r—
I
m
m C
C
d
D
D
G)
.--I
O
O
n
td �7
C
-� T7
C
Gl
O
D
O
£
C
I�T1
r
Z_
Z
X
C
\
D
D
3
D
C7
o
T)
p
O
=
b
m
2u
3
3
=
D<
t
m �<r�
�
d
m
---1
m
m
70
m
1
~i
- I
70
,t7
bd
r
(n
r
n
70
`)
z
t7
td
w
d -<
(n
-<
o
m
m
r
�J
=
O
D
/�
D
T7
d
D
d
3
H
to
iu
m
m
77
m
td
C
r
�TJ
D
C
Z
I>
td
<
3
F
<
<
m
d
Z
C
-{
=
Z
x
<
O
m
Z
Z
Z
D a
r Z
D
;o
D
<
1
Z
m
m
mGl
D
C
(�
r
Z
(n
� iL7
m
-7
O
3
O
70
=
20
C4
C
C
-I
Z7
m
C
a
r
(�
m
Z
C
x
m
Zl
m
i7
td
-�
m
m
C
- i
T
c
Z
c
Z
c
D
�7
r
m
C
Z
m
z
_
t7
Z
m
m
Z
i
n
C
7z7
m
(/) (n U) (f) (� 0 0
� n n C� C7 N N (n
C� Cn
(n Z U)
cD N Cn Cn C4 = N O 00 -4
= _
CA Cr Ul
_
x
tQ a> .P
W
cli
00
v Ul cfl
N
rn co
j
P ? 41 NP N)
N N
N t- -F, (A N N 41
-P �
-Am x
(J N N N
�' W N 00 CDN 00 C 71 CO UI N N
N
C�
N cp cD N
O IQc0 v CD (AN
CP
Cn
f
f
7
0)(b
N cN0
O�
C�
O
7
1
NP
N U
41
ffp�:
N� N>N
Co D
O
N
of
�o =-1
Co
C a
rn
rn
-,
Co
z oo
z cp C) O
Z �I Cn
rn
m Z
00
Z
Z
C7 Ut
N
Z
N
N
N
N 0
N N
IQ
O
Z
G
n
r
FTI
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Ul
N
i
j
Cn
N
cn
,
N
O
00
C11
N
6)
N
Z
Z
Z
bo
Z
v
0
v
Z
Cn
0
CJt
Cn
Mz
z
C7
C7
<
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
m
M
<
N
N
N
N
j
Rl
n
n
o
m
n
O
n
r
�
•P
_.
.{,.CA
O
'NJ
Cry
CO
_
00
O
J
n
N
m
O
bD
C7
�
m
L
I-j
I
r
roiz
r
m m 00 O a o r-<C r= m m= Z Z== D o= O m o -0 � Cl z rzr rrmc��m tdmm�rmC)X-,Qm
--� m i i N -i r i --i F- o m � m td d C< -< n�;
N� Z7o o �Dc=-<('l0x0r TJZ733r- C7�.r r+
0 C c-7zm xcryZo
yD r� t7 �I -It7 �N�C/1` n rr-iC7t7�D� z m220
�b OD Z ��G�1Zm~'Ca7Z�7D �c~/)Z'm"��z{>"-K M V1
Z m
O� Ztd m ? 0�mt:j O a y` M
�7 N�CD(� ViZ �{G1;7�F- 0rTi
�Z �C < � C:lZnW-I-i11=0 70moo ;v zdz�0
DD 3 D (i dpr"='-O�m DfrlClz�a� �1fT1CT1-V"
QZ m_ _ =zr I �z
V1= O Dr Cmztizo--iM"Wtz7Z0tjxt7-rJ
Z �" T a --i
_ H M �ZD t7 m Dm 1.
0 <, W�OaZ mmZ-{aM>uowt:jm
C1 < 2:— --I C��zOnr{DC fnrl�-0m� CZmmCm
Do .Zm)� NDmD�0��d n�3D m���D H0�7d
*1 m -1r�Z =gym--�-IT> 32C
OO �rod(7�mC� Z,yDZDD(�m3a-1
Z�Zm n Do:I:70 �C�d�rr=iC ZD
�td r m 3 D M x �7 Z O --i Z -i
m m OODrr-3r�DO ZDZn=�mM� -I
fTNI� (�1 ZantyZrmmz �Z C4--I(�� mO=
_ D --i-i C'7tyr C tJ3-imiTm_r.
Z Or
�7�--<ZImI�DC Ctj Z�Sn
D C m O 0 <:K r = Dm Z I�
D td7;7C7�oi-.D=-, J' n omma D C7
C<a-I��fZTlmr-< N70x-<` �n,�lmz2ur,
Z to (� 7C M-Z. C < m0 D Do< �mD
3 m T7m n --i/UD- <77�Gl--i�7mC)m��
n z ZmmtyZ-�I �tj to ;!tj -cMz
0 n D mv,e3dma m 3rmc�m-+�
N d M0-O�D XZa3 a o-i= iu-0
ty
xC�)=�:>nm �bdtzyZD mn0o u
mrm_A20 -7m <�Zr-2u0C-O=D
D Op 0 m m� N� 0 m m C n� << O m m<
td 7>m< O-0"K0 a;�u=mF---i27 0
.-I-I mCojCl>mTIZD --J 70 D=m 0700
D r zDtd"XTIZ El -(/) a~'D
-<GO �I'lo-{` Z rZZ
_ O ZCo n-9= d t7
3 N S
da O Z --i tj O Z7
C = Z td
m n
I I -
rJ
O ff-I
—
I