Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
97-100096
r_J of' RECEIVED BY MASTEI AND USE APPLICATION ("OMMUNITY 0EVELOPME010M TI OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33530 1st Way $auth+r+C&eQ Wgy, WA 48003 JAN 0 8,1997 APPLICATION NO. q -4 -M)--3 Date sc- P R 4 - 0Ob ( Agent Name of Applicant /9/' VXA-11-61Ae- lAe Owner Address 31,62& - C4,0W S '0�300 phone %� ��G Gd�y Signature 6� "IM4 Owner Name/Address hone (if different than applicant) Property Location 17 W Oa�1' S: 2 Z °l ¢' /G/7J,G ,tpgn, Kroll 36 6 Legal Description ��s // ^✓ A�4-ww 4166or ,qw.. / Project Description —Ivacf�, 8 4 LA —iv Parcel Number(s) hAWI/'IW 4f0010J Ae2/V. / FMI11au . ,R&WM1-`hW 0 La7 No s: 52 - S8 Type of Permit Required: .waRM SEPA Checklist Notice Sign Site Plan Review R Mailed R Beard x Land Surface Modification R R x Boundary Line Adjustment Binding Site Plan R R R Short Subdivision * x x Subdivision R R R Shoreline R R Variance R R R Conditional Use R R R Use -Process I Use - Process H R R x R Use - Process III R R R Quasi -Judicial Rezone R R R Variance R* R R Comp. Plan/Rezone R R Annexation R R Lot Line Elimination *Pre -Application Meeting R = Required * = O tionai h , Cif CITY OF Pr)WO11, 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH Mr. David Morrison Parklane Ventures 31620 23rd Avenue South, Suite 320 Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 February 13, 1998 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL TI3RESHOLD DETERNIINATION Heritage Woods Tract H & J Filling &Grading, Application No: SEP97-0001 Dear Mr. Morrison: The Environmental Checklist you have submitted has been reviewed by this office and other city staff. We have determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of this determination of nonsignificance (DNS) is enclosed. A 15-day comment period is required by the SEPA Rules (WAC 197-11-340). A notice inviting comments will be published in the Tacoma News Tribune on February 14, 1998. At the end of the comment period, the department will determine if the DNS should be withdrawn, modified, or issued as proposed. All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days following the comment deadline. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period. Our decision not to require an EIS does not mean that the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the city has been granted. Approval or denial of the proposal will be made by the appropriate administrative or legislative body vested with that authority. The environmental record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions will be imposed to reduce identified environmental impacts as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated city policy. After a final decision has been made on your proposal (i.e., after a permit has been issued or City Council action taken, as applicable), you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as set forth in RCW 43.21C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. A copy of the Notice of Action form and copies of RCW 43.21C.080 and WAC 197-11-680 providing instructions for giving this notice are available from the Department of Community Development Services. AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I 44a g=- hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Application ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Notice of Determination of Significance Notice of Determination of Non - Significance and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Environmental Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Proposed Land Use Action ❑ Notice of Public Land Use Hearing ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Land Use Application ❑ Other was mailed/faxedoos�e to/at each of following addresses (see attached.) on 1998. Project Name k f V'l f 1 �t I rl _' File Number(s) SC�91=0_I F( I t 1 tqG- Signature Date AFFOAv(.FRM REVISED 1/8/98 CITY OF G `, (253) 661-4000 V� 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: SEP97-0001 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Grading and filling approximately 30,000 cubic yards of fill material within Heritage Woods Division I Tracts H and 7, to facilitate future single family residence construction. PROPONENT: David Morrison, Parklane Ventures LOCATION: Within Heritage Woods Division I, along the east side of 25th Place South, in Federal Way, WA. LEAD AGENCY: City of Federal Way The responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, the "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist; Application No. SEP97-0001," this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to R.C.W. 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RC.W. 43.21C. 032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on March 2,1998. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city"s final determination may file an appeal with the city within 14 days of the above comment deadline. CONTACT PERSON: Tim Harris, Senior Planner PHONE: (253) 661-4019 RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Gregory D. Moore, AICP POSITION/TITLE: Director of Community Development Services ADDRESS: 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 DATE ISSUED: F 14 1998 SIGNATURE: L.\PRMSYSVDOCUMEN \SEP97 00.01\DNS.DOC CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST HERITAGE WOODS TRACTS H & J FILLING AND GRADING Federal Way File No: SEP97-0001 I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action is to fill and grade approximately 30,000 cubic yards of fill material within Heritage Woods Tracts H and J for future single family residential development. EXHIBITS - Lot Grading Plan For Tracts Hand J, by Jaeger Engineering. SEPA Checklist dated revised October 13, 1997 by David Morrison, Parklane Ventures. Geo-technical reports by Golder Associates Dated 2/4/98, 1/13/98, 11/17/98 and 7/14/98. Vegetation Reconnaissances by Roger delMoral dated 8/15/97 and 8/8/98. Vicinity Map. H. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Heritage Woods Tracts H & J Filling and Grading. Applicant: David Morrison, Parklane Ventures 31620 23rd Avenue South Suite 320 Federal Way, WA 98003 (253)946-3652 Location: Within Heritage Woods subdivision Division 1, Tracts H and J, along 25th Place Southeast. Located in the east 1/2 of Section 33, Township 22 North, Range 4 East. Zoning: RS 7.2 Residential Single Family SEPA Staff Evaluation SEP97-0001 Page 2 Comprehensive Plan Designation: High Density Single Family NOTE: Technical reports and exhibits referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Jim Harris, Senior Planner, Department of Community Development, 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, Washington, 98003, Phone: (253)661-4019. M. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL Proposal is to fill and grade approximately 30,000 cubic yards of material within Tracts H and J of the Heritage Woods subdivision to develop single family residential building pads. IV. REVIEW PROCESS The action of filling and grading 30,000 cubic yards of material within the future residential lots was not included with the 1992 environmental review for the subdivision construction. Review of the proposal also requires a land use Process III decision by the Director of Community Development Services as a minor modification of the Heritage Woods Preliminary Plat conditions 6 and 7. A grading permit is also required. The project must comply with all applicable regulations of the city's zoning code and applicable development regulations and policies. V. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted with the application. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the environmental checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. • & * 1 - 3 -- Concur with checklist. SEPA Staff Evaluation SEP97-0001 Page 3 4 -- Revised SEPA checklist was submitted to the City of Federal Way on October 13, 1997. 5 - 6 -- Concur with checklist. 7 -- Heritage Woods Division II is not part of this proposal but will also likely be constructed during the spring/summer of 1998. Future subdividing of Tracts H and J was included in Heritage Woods Division 11, as approved in the 1992 preliminary plat approval for the 111 lot Heritage Woods subdivision. 8 -- Geo-technical information reports relating to the proposal dated February 4, 1998, January 13, 1998, November 17, 1997, and July 14, 1997 have been prepared by Golder and Associates. 9 and 10 -- Additional government approvals or permits needed for this proposal include a Process III decision by the Community Development Director to provide minor modification to preliminary plat conditions 6 and 7. 11 and 12-- Concur with checklist. Earth: a - c -- Concur with checklist. d -- Concur with checklist, additionally the slope has been stabilized during the spring and summer of 1997 under the guidance of Golder Associates recommendation. e and f -- Erosion could potentially occur as a result of the fill and grade proposal. Provisions for erosion control and equipment limits shall be provided by the applicant prior to construction, and consistent with any conditions of the Process III review. g -- Ultimately the lots will be developed with single family residences, and will be required to comply with applicable zoning regulations and maximum lot coverage standards allowed for residential uses. h -- A temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) plan is required SEPA Staff Evaluation SEP97-0001 Page 4 in conjunction with approval of a grading permit. The erosion control plan shall be implemented prior to initiating the fill and grade proposal. Geo-technical engineering recommendations will be followed, as well as any applicable code conditions or special conditions imposed with the Process III review, under the guidance of Federal Way City Code section 22-1286 (geologically hazardous area development), if approved. 2. Air: a -- Short term impacts to air quality may occur during the fill and grade operation, similar to the air quality impacts resulting from the plat construction, and may contribute to increases in local suspended particulate levels. Short term construction activity will also contribute to increased carbon monoxide levels through the operation of construction machinery. b and c -- Concur with checklist. 3. Water: a (1)-- Concur with checklist. a (2) -- No work will occur and no machinery will be within 100 feet of the wetland areas in the adjacent tracts. a (3) (4) (5) and (6) -- Concur with checklist. b(1) and (2) -- Concur with checklist. c(1) and (2) and d -- All drainage will be connected to an engineered drainage system. Any revisions to the drainage system resulting from this proposal require review and approval by the city. Compliance with all applicable code requirements will mitigate any potential adverse environmental impacts. 4. Plants: a, b and c -- Tree and vegetation descriptions are provided in reports by Roger delMoral dated August 8 and August 15, 1997. The reports detail the extent and condition of the existing vegetation within and in close SEPA Staff Evaluation SEP97-0001 Page 5 proximity to Tracts H and J. d -- A landscape/revegetation plan by Landscape Professionals and Golder Associates was submitted on January 16, 1997. The landscape plan will be reviewed by the city and implemented as a condition of the Process III review, under the authority of FWCC section 22-1286. The landscape plan will include native vegetation, and shall provide appropriate replacement ratio for trees removed. Compliance with applicable code requirements will mitigate potential adverse environmental impacts. 5. Animals: a and b -- Concur with checklist. c -- The site is part of the Pacific Flyway. d -- Concur with checklist, also reference comment under 4(d) above. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a, b and c -- Concur with checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a -- Concur with checklist. b(1) -- Concur with checklist. b (2) & (3) -- During the fill and grade operation, noise levels will increase on the site due to construction activity. Pursuant to FWCC, Section 22-1006, construction activity and the operation of any heavy equipment will be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, with such activities being prohibited on Sundays or on holidays observed by the city unless an exception is granted by the City of Federal Way Community Development Director. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a and b -- Concur with checklist. SEPA Staff Evaluation SEP97-0001 Page 6 c -- No buildings are proposed at this time, Tracts H and 7 are included in the preliminary plat to accommodate seven future single family residences. d -- Concur with checklist. e -- The site is zoned RS 7.2 f -- The Comprehensive Plan designation of the site is High Density Single Family. g -- The site is not within 200 feet of a shoreline under the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act. h -- The site is within an erosion hazard and steep slope area, and a minor slide/slough occurred during the winter of 1997 at the site. i, j and k -- This project of will not result in the displacement of any residences or impact any employment. 1-- The proposal must comply with recommendation of the design geo- technical engineer, the city's consultant review, with code requirements and conditions of the administrative Process III review under the development regulations for working within a geologically hazardous area. Construction must meet all applicable standards of the City of Federal Way and other regulatory agencies. Future residential home construction on the site will be required to be built in accordance with approved geo-technical engineering recommendations as required by the city in accordance with Federal Way City Code section 22-1286 and applicable Uniform Building Code requirements. As a result of the review process, which includes SEPA review, Process III review, and grading permit, compliance with all code requirements will be ensured and all potentially adverse environmental impacts should be addressed. 9. Housing: SEPA Staff Evaluation SEP97-0001 Page 7 a, b and c -- The number of housing units is not increased by this proposal, as the preliminary plat approval included seven future lots for Tracts H and J. 10. Aesthetics: a, b and c -- Since the elevation of the lots is being increase by up to 17 feet in depth, a height variance for future home construction on several of the proposed lots with Tracts H and 7 may be required. Under FWCC Average Building Elevation definition, the existing grade is to be used for measuring building height. Therefore, future homes may exceed the 30 foot maximum building height unless a variance is approved by the Hearing Examiner under a separate application. A letter to Schneider Homes from the City of Federal Way dated February 3, 1998 provides further detail regarding the height standards and variance process. 11. Light and Glare: a, b, c and d -- Concur with checklist. 12. Recreation: a, b and c -- Concur with checklist. The four acre park was dedicated to the public simultaneously with recording of Heritage Woods Division I. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a, b and c -- Concur with checklist. 14. Transportation: a, b, c, d and a -- Concur with checklist. f and g -- The fill and grade proposal will not result in significant additional traffic generation and therefore no traffic mitigation is necessary. 15. Public Services: SEPA Staff Evaluation SEP97-0001 Page 8 a and b -- Concur with checklist. 16. Utilities: a and b -- Concur with checklist. V. CONCLUSION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment pursuant to a determination of nonsignificance (DNS). This DNS is based on impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Application No. SEP97-0001", and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by Federal Way for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. The city reserves the right to review any future revisions or alterations to the site or to the proposal to determine the environmental significance or non -significance of the project. Prepared by: Jim Harris, Senior Planner Date: February 13, 1998 L:IPFMSYSW0CUMENT%SFP97 00.01\EVAL DOC CITY OF jC�- (253) 661-4000 M 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION , S I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, t ❑ Notice of Application ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Notice of Determination of Non - Significance and Scoping Notice 0' Notice of Environmental Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Environmental Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Proposed Land Use Action ❑ Notice of Public Land Use Hearing ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Land Use Application ❑ Other was mail faxed/ osted to/at each of following addresses (see attached) on 1998. Project Name File Number(s) ' Signature AFFIDAvf.FRM REVISED 1/2/98 Date _ _ -----Z, -/-r-7e 02/13/98 FRI 09:51 FAX 2536614129 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY xc*�c TX REPORTxc CM 001 TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 0948 CONNECTION TEL 95527042 CONNECTION ID TNT—TEL. SALES ST. TIME 02/13 09:50 USAGE T 01'05 PGS. 2 RESULT OK C O V E R FAX S H E E T To: Fax From: Phone: 3 IL Subject: Date: -/-I -qk Pages: :2 including this cover sheet. eOF(253)661-4000 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON APPLICATION NO: SEP97-0001 The City of Federal Way has determined that the following project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environment Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the city. PROPOSED ACTION: Grading and filling approximately 30,000 cubic yards of fill material within Heritage Woods Division I Tracts H and J, to facilitate future single family residence construction. APPLICANT: David Morrison, Parklane Ventures LOCATION: Within Heritage Woods Division I, along the east side of 25th Place South, in Federal Way, WA. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services, Federal Way City Hall, 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA, 98003, contact Jim Harris, Senior Planner at (253) 661-4019. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on March 2, 1998. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the city's determination may file an appeal with the city within 14 days of the above comment deadline. PUBLISHED IN THE TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE ON February 14, 1998. L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENTVSEP97-00.01\DNSNOT.DOC CITY OFfe.-- 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: SEP97-0001 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Grading and filling approximately 30,000 cubic yards of fill material within Heritage Woods Division I Tracts H and J, to facilitate future single family residence construction. PROPONENT: David Morrison, Parklane Ventures LOCATION: Within Heritage Woods Division I, along the east side of 25th Place South, in Federal Way, WA. LEAD AGENCY: City of Federal Way The responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, the "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist; Application No. SEP97-0001," this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to R.C.W. 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under R.C.W. 43.21C. 032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on March 2, 1998. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal with the city within 14 days of the above comment deadline. CONTACT PERSON: Jim Harris, Senior Planner PHONE: (253) 661-4019 RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Gregory D. Moore, AICP POSITION/TITLE: Director of Community Development Services ADDRESS: 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 DATE ISSUED: February 14, 1998 SIGNATURE: LAPRMSYSMOCUMENMEP97 00.01\DNS.DOC Heritage Woods Tracts H and J -Filling and Grading January 1998 Federal Way CityMap SCALE 1:5995 Note: Ttis map is infentedfar use as a gaphiampresentatfon only. Me Gfty of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its a=racy. CITY OF C� (253) 661-4000 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I - hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a. ❑ Notice of Application ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Notice of Determination of Non - Significance and Scoping Notice e' Notice of Environmental Determination ofNon-Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Environmental Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Proposed Land Use Action ❑ Notice of Public Land Use Hearing ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Land Use Application ❑ Other wa mailed/ ed/posted to/at each of following addresses (see attached) on "/3 1998. Project Name File Number(s) Signature i Date AFRDAv►.FRm REVISED 1/2/98 (,pls��-� r( Wao d 5 FEMA REGION 10 NTH DIV 130 - 228TH ST SW BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 EPA ENVIRONRVIEW SECT MD-126 1200 - 6TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98101 FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE ECOLOGICAL SRV DIVISION 3704 GRIFFIN IN SE STE 102 OLYMPIA WA 98501 DNR - FOREST RESOURCE DIV NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM PO BOX 47016 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7016 PS REGIONAL COUNCIL GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT 1011 WESTERN AVE #500 SEATTLE WA 98104-1040 PORT OF TACOMA ENVIRONMENTAL DEPT PO BOX 1837 TACOMA WA 98401-1837 KING CO PARKS DIVISION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 2040 - 84TH ST SE MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 SEATTLE&ING COUNTY DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 1404 CENTRAL AVE S STE 101 KENT WA 98032 GERI WALKER GEO INFO SPEC FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIST 31405 - 18TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS ATM REGULATORY BRANCH PO BOX 3755 SEATTLE WA 98124 DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONRVIEW SECT PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 1 WS1 OT ENVIRONMENTAL DEPT PO BOX 47300 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7300 DEPT OF HEALTH AIRDUSTRIAL CENTER BID 2 PO BOX 47820 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7820 SEPA RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL KC WASTWATER TREATMENT DIV ENVIRONMENTAL DIV M/S 81 821 SECOND AVE SEATTLE WA 98104 PORT OF SEATTLE PO BOX 1209 SEATTLE WA 98111 KC BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD 810 THIRD AVE STE 608 SEATTLE WA 98104-1693 TRANSPORTATION PLAN SECT 976 KING CO ADMINBLDG 500 FOURTH AVE SEATTLE WA 98104 LAKEHAVENUTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 JOE HENRY NATURAL RESOURCES CVN SVC 935 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 DNR SEPA CENTER PO BOX 47015 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CNTRL AGENCY 110 UNION ST STE 500 SEATTLE WA 98101-2038 SEPA RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL KC TRANSIT CTR DIV ENV PLAN & REAL EST MIS 122 821 SECOND AVE SEATTLE WA 98104 MARK CAREY LAND USE SVC - KCDDES 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055-1219 KING CO DEPT OF PUBLIC WKS SOLID WASTE DIVISION 400 YESLER WY #600 SEATTLE WA 98104-2637 KING CO ROADS DIVISION COUNTY ROADS ENGINEER 500 FOURTH AVE RM 900 SEATTLE WA 98104 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DISTRICT #39 31617 - 1 ST AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUYALLUP INTERNATIONAL PUYALLUP TRIBE 39015 - 172ND AVE SE 3702 MARINE VIEW DR NE 2002 E 28TH ST AUBURN WA 98002 TACOMA WA 98422 TACOMA WA 98404 *----=-------------------- -: MetroScan / King Owner :Stevens Guy C Site :28204 27th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :2705 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 1 BRITTONS FIRST ADD Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,800 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Conner Jimmy D Site :28210 27th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28210 27th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 2 BRITTONS FIRST ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,680 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Felho Sandor D Site :28100 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28100 28th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 1 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,800 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Nelson L Marilee Est Site :28103 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :PO Box 79 Carbonado Wa 98323 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 2 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,610 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Tkachuk Anatoliy Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Mail :28404 228th Ave SE Maple Valley Wa 98038 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 3 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Sorenson Joe & Patsy Site :28039 28th Ave S Federal Way 98002 Mail :28111 28th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 4 & 10 ELLENWOOD MANOR Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:3,430 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Peterson Russell & B Site :28045 28th Ave S Federal Way 98002 Mail :28117 28th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 5 & 10 ELLENWOOD MANOR Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:2/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:3,220 *------------------------------• MetroScan / King Owner :Taing Lee Jane & Chen Li Gang Site :2720 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 Mail :2720 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 6 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/2 / Stories:l B1dgSF:3,290 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Bush Robert B Site :2712 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 Mail :2712 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 7 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:2 B1dgSF:2,880 --------------------------+. Parcel # :111700 0010 06 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$130,000 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB:1962 Ph:206-839-2890 .---------------------* Parcel # :111700 0020 04 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$125,100 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB:1961 Ph:206-839-5014 . ------------------------------- Parcel # :231240 0010 09 Sale Date :05/15/91 Sale Price :$133,500 Full Asd.V :$133,200 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.49 YB:1991 Ph:206-529-0219 •-------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0020 07 Sale Date :11/17/92 Sale Price Asd.V :$65,000 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.28 YB:1995 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0030 05 Sale Date :07/03/97 Sale Price :$20,000 Full Asd.V :$24,000 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.27 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0040 03 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$143,900 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.41 YB:1962 Ph:206-839-4072 •-------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0050 00 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$141,500 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.49 YB:1962 Ph:206-839-2616 ------------------------------- Parcel # :231240 0060 08 Sale Date :02/25/93 Sale Price Asd.V :$138,300 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.26 YB:1962 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0070 06 Sale Date :04/02/85 Sale Price :$14,000 Asd.V :$139,400 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.23 YB:1987 Ph:206-941-4444 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *.-----=---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Bush Robert B Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Mail :2712 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 8 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Bush Robert B Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Mail :2712 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 9 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Walker Grant A & Teresa Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Mail :28213 27th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 1 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Walker Grant A & Yuskoff Tere Site :28213 27th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28213 27th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 2 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,410 *------------------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Brewer E H Site :28221 27th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28221 27th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 3 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,260 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Wattum Donald L Site :28229 27th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28229 27th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 4 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,910 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Wattum Donald L Site :28233 27th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28229 27th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 5 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,390 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Geib Frank E & Rita M Site :28241 27th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28241 27th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 6 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,250 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Monsen Joseph K Site :28247 27th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28247 27th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 7 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,010 1 --------------------------- Parcel # :231240 0080 04 Sale Date :04/02/85 Sale Price :$14,000 Asd.V :$27,000 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.23 YB: Ph:206-941-4444 •-------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0090 02 Sale Date :11/23/83 Sale Price :$14,000 Asd.V :$27,000 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.35 YB: Ph:206-941-4444 : ------------------------------- Parcel # :231240 0110 08 Sale Date :04/19/90 Sale Price :$30,000 Asd.V :$27,000 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0120 06 Sale Date :04/13/90 Sale Price :$110,000 Asd.V :$102,600 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB:1965 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0130 04 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$96,300 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB:1967 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0140 02 Sale Date :04/13/94 Sale Price Asd.V :$113,100 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB:1966 Ph:206-839-3079 .----------------- --------------* Parcel # :231240 0150 09 Sale Date :04/13/94 Sale Price Asd.V :$106,300 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB:1980 Ph:206-839-3079 : ------------------------------- Parcel # :231240 0160 07 Sale Date :09/29/93 Sale Price Asd.V :$85,200 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB:1948 Ph: .--------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0170 05 Sale Date :06/09/83 Sale Price :$16,000 Asd.V :$116,000 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB:1985 Ph:206-941-7398 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *:------=-------------------- �i-: MetroScan / King Owner :Leisure Monroe E Site :2612 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Mail :2612 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 8 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,670 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Mark John J & Anne Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Mail :1606 SW 325th P1 Federal Way Wa 98023 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 9 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *----------------------------- MetroScan / King Owner :Wicks Matthew T & Tanya Site :28216 Military Rd S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28216 Military Rd S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 10 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,750 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Walker Elaine K Site :28224 Military Rd S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28224 Military Rd S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 11 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,990 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Seis Davis F & Janice R Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Mail :11641 SE 188th St Renton Wa 98058 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 12 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *------------------------------• MetroScan / King Owner :Roll Jr Nelson E & Sheri W Site :28236 Military Rd S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28236 Military Rd S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 13 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,810 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Warrior Longhair Site :2604 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Mail :2604 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 14 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,580 *------------------------------• MetroScan / King Owner :Whitish Bruce D & Elaine J Site :27606 S 284th St Federal Way 98002 Mail :2524 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 15 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,670 *------------------------------• MetroScan / King Owner :Forks Judson D & Shannon D Site :2516 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Mail :2516 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 16 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/2 / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,040 Parcel # :231240 0180 03 Sale Date :12/23/91 Sale Price :$129,950 Full Asd.V :$121,300 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB:1987 Ph:206-941-0165 ------------------------------- Parcel # :231240 0190 01 Sale Date :05/30/96 Sale Price :$25,000 Full Asd.V :$24,000 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.23 YB: Ph:206-874-6551 .-------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0200 09 Sale Date :08/14/95 Sale Price :$134,000 Full Asd.V :$112,600 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.24 YB:1990 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0210 07 Sale Date :02/01/94 Sale Price :$137,000 Full Asd.V :$125,800 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.32 YB:1991 Ph:206-839-4288 •-------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0220 05 Sale Date :01/09/92 Sale Price :$20,696 Full Asd.V :$24,000 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.17 YB: Ph:206-271-8864 ------------------------------- Parcel # :231240 0230 03 Sale Date :04/22/93 Sale Price :$143,000 Full Asd.V :$121,800 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.27 YB:1992 Ph:206-941-2912 •-------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0240 01 Sale Date :12/06/94 Sale Price :$131,950 Full Asd.V :$106,100 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.22 YB:1984 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0250 08 Sale Date :06/18/93 Sale Price :$99,950 Full Asd.V :$104,400 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.23 YB:1956 Ph:206-839-3754 : ------------------------------- Parcel # :231240 0260 06 Sale Date :12/21/87 Sale Price :$80,850 Asd.V :$116,800 Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.21 YB:1983 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *.-----=---•----------------�-: MetroScan / King Owner :Bennett Ralph A & Anna M Site :2508 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Mail :2508 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 17 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,300 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Schmitt James M Site :2502 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Mail :32552 41st Ave SW Federal Way Wa 98023 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 18 ELLENWOOD MANOR ADD Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *------------------------------• MetroScan / King Owner :Briggs Richard A/Marisel N Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Mail :28438 Old Military Rd Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 31 S 65 FT OF Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *------------------------------• MetroScan / King Owner :Henderson Marvin E & Karen L Site :28433 Old Military Rd S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28433 Old Military Rd S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 36 LOT 1 REV Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,100 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Hamilton Kenneth H Site :28425 Military Rd S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28425 Military Rd S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 77 POR OF N 1/2 Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,050 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Demers Harrison H Site :28434 Military Rd S Federal Way 98003 Mail :30640 Pacific Hwy S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 86 POR OF SW 1/4 Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:560 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Wilson Thomas E & Dee J Site :28404 Military Rd S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28404 Military Rd S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 96 LOT 1 OF KC Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,040 *------------------------------• MetroScan / King Owner :Brush Peter G;Perrault Leslie C Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Mail :28422 Military Rd S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 104 POR OF SW Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *------------------------------ • MetroScan / King Owner :Lakehaven Utility District Site :28405 Military Rd S Federal Way 98003 Mail :PO Box 4249 Federal Way Wa 98063 Use :622 Ind,Utilities,Public,Garage/Electri Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 141 POR OF SW Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: -------------------------- Parcel # :231240 0270 04 Sale Date :05/11/83 Sale Price :$50,000 Asd.V :$89,300 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.17 YB:1955 Ph:206-941-9181 •-------------------------------* Parcel # :231240 0280 02 Sale Date :08/30/84 Sale Price :$13,000 Asd.V :$40,000 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.24 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :332204 9031 05 Sale Date :06/10/97 Sale Price :$30,000 Full Asd.V :$35,000 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.36 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :332204 9036 00 Sale Date :07/31/96 Sale Price Asd.V :$89,700 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.23 YB:1946 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :332204 9077 00 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$94,400 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.79 YB:1948 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :332204 9086 09 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$67,400 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:1.05 YB:1947 Ph:206-941-0234 --------- -------------- Parcel # :332204 9096 07 Sale Date :03/27/96 Sale Price :$90,000 Full Asd.V :$74,800 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.35 YB:1948 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :332204 9104 07 Sale Date :05/02/97 Sale Price :$39,000 Full Asd.V :$54,000 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.49 YB: Ph: ------------------------------- Parcel # :332204 9141 02 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$244,100 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.65 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *.-----=-------------------- �- MetroScan / King Owner :Brush Peter G & Perrault Lesl Site :28422 Military Rd S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28422 Military Rd S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 168 POR OF SW Bedrm:l Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,200 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Pecak Jan & Jitka Site :28427 Old Military Rd S Auburn 98003 Mail :28427 Old Military Rd S Auburn Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 206 LOT 2 REV Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,320 *------------------------------• MetroScan / King Owner :Lakehaven Utility District Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Mail :PO Box 4249 Federal Way Wa 98063 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 207 LOT 3 REV Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *------------------------------• MetroScan / King Owner :Whitman Carrie & Mitchell Etal Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Mail :8202 19th Ave NE Seattle Wa 98115 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 212 POR OF SW Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Robbins Mark R Site :2505 S 284th St Auburn 98003 Mail :2505 S 284th St Auburn Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :STR 332204 TAXLOT 215 LOT 2 OF KC Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:2,170 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Brown Charles E Site :28101 29th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28101 29th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :LOT 8 IMPERIAL MANOR Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:3/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,920 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Young Ronald L Site :28105 29th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28235 28th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :LOT 9 IMPERIAL MANOR Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,000 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Wise Huey Paul Site :28128 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28128 28th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :LOT 15 IMPERIAL MANOR Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:2,180 *------------------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Ronish Randall L Site :28122 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :28122 28th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :LOT 16 IMPERIAL MANOR Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,140 -------------------------- Parcel # :332204 9168 00 Sale Date :07/30/93 Sale Price :$50,000 Full Asd.V :$51,400 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.24 YB:1948 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :332204 9206 04 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$114,600 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.18 YB:1979 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :332204 9207 03 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$30,000 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.25 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :332204 9212 06 Sale Date :03/06/90 Sale Price Asd.V :$40,000 Q:NE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:1.56 YB: Ph: • -------------------------------- Parcel # :332204 9215 03 Sale Date :07/20/94 Sale Price Asd.V :$133,900 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.27 YB:1963 Ph:206-839-2546 •-------------------------------* Parcel # :356820 0080 07 Sale Date :01/13/89 Sale Price :$98,980 Asd.V :$132,400 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.82 YB:1988 Ph:206-941-4132 ------------------------------- Parcel # :356820 0090 05 Sale Date :08/19/94 Sale Price :$145,000 Full Asd.V :$125,100 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.24 YB:1988 Ph: • -------------------------------* Parcel # :356820 0150 02 Sale Date :07/27/88 Sale Price :$112,110 Asd.V :$137,400 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.27 YB:1988 Ph:206-946-2647 .----------- --------------------* Parcel # :356820 0160 00 Sale Date :12/14/88 Sale Price :$108,000 Asd.V :$133,300 Q:SE S:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.25 YB:1988 Ph:206-946-0473 The Information Provided is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *-----=-------------------- - MetroScan / King ---------------------------* Owner :Palmer Arley F Parcel # :356820 0170 08 Site :28114 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :12/30/88 Mail :28114 28th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$112,431 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$133,700 Lgl :LOT 17 IMPERIAL MANOR Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,180 Ac:.23 YB:1988 Ph:206-941-2296 MetroScan / King :----•-------------------------------* Owner :Parks Catherine L Parcel # :356820 0180 06 Site :28108 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :11/25/91 Mail :28108 28th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$129,500 Lgl :LOT 18 IMPERIAL MANOR Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,060 Ac:.19 YB:1988 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Cunio Anthony R & Pamela A Parcel # :356820 0190 04 Site :28104 29th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :01/03/91 Mail :28104 28th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$147,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$126,500 Lgl :LOT 19 IMPERIAL MANOR Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,690 Ac:.24 YB:1988 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Barnes Edward L & Sharon A Parcel # :422220 0080 03 Site :2227 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :02/12/93 Mail :2227 S 284th P1 Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$113,600 Lgl :LOT 8 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,930 Ac:.17 YB:1967 Ph:206-839-9238 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King : --- --------- .__,-_________-------* Owner :Grow Donald C Parcel # :422220 0090 01 Site :2235 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :2235 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$108,200 Lgl :LOT 9 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,320 Ac:.17 YB:1967 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Nellum William & Patricia Ann Parcel # :422220 0100 09 Site :2243 S 284th P1 Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :04/13/94 Mail :1800 Grant Ave S #D5 Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$114,950 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$107,200 Lgl :LOT 10 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,040 Ac:.17 YB:1968 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Murray Michael F Jr Parcel # :422220 0110 07 Site :2303 S 284th P1 Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/30/94 Mail :2303 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$90,600 Lgl :LOT 11 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:950 Ac:.17 YB:1968 Ph:206-946-8803 *------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Adams Rodney R & Candace L Parcel # :422220 0120 05 Site :2311 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :03/17/89 Mail :2311 S 284th P1 Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$80,497 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$106,700 Lgl :LOT 12 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,460 Ac:.17 YB:1968 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Lukyamuzi John A & Gladys N Parcel # :422220 0130 03 Site :2317 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/07/88 Mail :2317 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$61,500 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$107,700 Lgl :LOT 13 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.17 YB:1968 Ph:206-839-5002 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. �'-: *.--------------------------- MetroScan / King ----------------------------* Owner :Christensen James & Betty J Parcel # :422220 0140 01 Site :2325 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :03/13/92 Mail :2221 N 180th St Seattle Wa 98133 Sale Price :$100,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$113,600 Lgl :LOT 14 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,690 Ac:.17 YB:1968 Ph:206-368-8490 *------------------------------ • MetroScan / King : ------------------------------- Owner :Lee Kellie Sam & Khieng Huot Parcel # :422220 0150 08 Site :2333 S 284th P1 Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :2333 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$101,500 Lgl :LOT 15 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,310 Ac:.17 YB:1968 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King :---_______--_-_------__-___---_* Owner :Peterson Darlene J Parcel # :422220 0160 06 Site :2339 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :03/18/94 Mail :2339 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$108,000 Full Use :901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$38,000 Lgl :LOT 16 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:.17 YB: Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Whitehead Harold W Parcel # :422220 0170 04 Site :2330 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :2330 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$90,700 Lgl :LOT 17 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:950 Ac:.18 YB:1968 Ph:206-839-4932 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Rudzinski John Parcel # :422220 0180 02 Site :2324 S 285th Pl Federal Way 98002 Sale Date Mail :2324 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$90,800 Lgl :LOT 18 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:950 Ac:.23 YB:1967 Ph:206-839-8844 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Houser Elizabeth M Parcel # :422220 0190 00 Site :2318 S 285th Pl Federal Way 98002 Sale Date :10/04/90 Mail :2318 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$98,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$91,200 Lgl :LOT 19 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:950 Ac:.17 YB:1967 Ph:206-946-5580 *------------------------------ • MetroScan / King Owner :Boutelle William D & Melissa Parcel # :422220 0200 08 Site :2312 S 285th Pl Federal Way 98002 Sale Date :08/31/88 Mail :2312 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$73,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$101,100 Lgl :LOT 20 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,260 Ac:.25 YB:1967 Ph:206-927-0233 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King :-----------__---------------_-_* Owner :Sykes Elizabeth Parcel # :422220 0210 06 Site :2306 S 285th Pl Federal Way 98002 Sale Date :11/05/86 Mail :5530 15th Ave S Seattle Wa 98108 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$103,300 Lgl :LOT 21 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.18 YB:1967 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King •------------------------------* Owner :Stuckey Kevin D & Michelle K Parcel # :422220 0220 04 Site :2300 S 285th Pl Federal Way 98002 Sale Date :07/30/96 Mail :2300 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$116,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$106,400 Lgl :LOT 22 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,460 Ac:.16 YB:1967 Ph: The Information Provided is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. �'- ^1--------------------------* *-----=-------------------- MetroScan / King -- Owner :Mungra Dungar D Parcel # :422220 0230 02 Site :2240 S 285th Pl Federal Way 98002 Sale Date :08/27/93 Mail :2242 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$108,600 Lgl :LOT 23 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.16 YB:1967 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Mercado Virginia C Parcel # :422220 0240 00 Site :2232 S 285th Pl Federal Way 98002 Sale Date Mail :2232 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$90,400 Lgl :LOT 24 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:950 Ac:.16 YB:1967 Ph:206-941-1817 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Roland Earl B/Tracey L Parcel # :422220 0250 07 Site :2224 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :03/27/97 Mail :2224 S 284th P1 Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$131,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$102,100 Lgl :LOT 25 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.16 YB:1967 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Prine Timothy A Parcel # :422220 0260 05 Site :2218 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :05/23/94 Mail :2218 S 284th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$116,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$110,300 Lgl :LOT 26 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.16 YB:1967 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Stuart Michael J & Stephanie Parcel # :422220 0300 07 Site :2205 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :08/28/96 Mail :2205 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$109,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$97,700 Lgl :LOT 30 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,220 Ac:.19 YB:1968 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Wozniak Kerry;Standlee Sandra Parcel # :422220 0310 05 Site :2209 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :02/28/97 Mail :2209 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$129,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$117,100 Lgl :LOT 31 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,040 Ac:.18 YB:1968 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Seatz David 0 H Sr & Mary L Parcel # :422220 0320 03 Site :2213 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/20/90 Mail :2213 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$118,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$100,600 Lgl :LOT 32 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,280 Ac:.16 YB:1968 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Venable Thomas C & Hyrna A Parcel # :422220 0330 01 Site :2217 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :05/14/93 Mail :2217 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$122,450 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$116,400 Lgl :LOT 33 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,440 Ac:.16 YB:1968 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Burns Sally Parcel # :422220 0340 09 Site :2221 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :2221 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$124,000 Lgl :LOT 34 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,750 Ac:.21 YB:1968 Ph:206-839-0592 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ------=-------------------- $- MetroScan / King ----------------------------* Owner :Evans A Wiley & Heidi M Parcel # :422220 0350 06 Site :2224 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :11/27/96 Mail :2224 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$134,950 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$125,800 Lgl :LOT 35 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,750 Ac:.17 YB:1968 Ph: * ------------------------------ : MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Hancock Timothy R & Kelli M Parcel # :422220 0360 04 Site :2220 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :03/21/94 Mail :2220 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$117,600 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$99,500 Lgl :LOT 36 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,220 Ac:.18 YB:1968 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Lewis Robert D & Janet S Parcel # :422220 0370 02 Site :2216 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :08/24/92 Mail :2216 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$128,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$110,300 Lgl :LOT 37 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,440 Ac:.20 YB:1968 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Warren Donald W Parcel # :422220 0380 00 Site :2212 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :2212 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$115,600 Lgl :LOT 38 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,930 Ac:.18 YB:1968 Ph:206-941-5324 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • ------------------------------- Owner :Trevino Laura Lee Parcel # :422220 0390 08 Site :2204 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :12/15/92 Mail :2204 S 284th St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$129,950 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$118,000 Lgl :LOT 39 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,420 Ac:.18 YB:1968 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Cripe Clarence G Parcel # :422220 0400 06 Site :28312 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :4961 Browndeer Ln Palos Verdes Estates Ca 90275 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$101,000 Lgl :LOT 40 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,280 Ac:.18 YB:1968 Ph: *------------------------------: MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Webb Keith T & Et All Parcel # :422220 0410 04 Site :2205 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :10/13/89 Mail :3815 Hampton Way Kent Wa 98032 Sale Price :$85,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$118,500 Lgl :LOT 41 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,420 Ac:.19 YB:1968 Ph:206-850-3077 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King :----_-__-_-_-_-______-__- Owner :Artz Brenton T Parcel # :422220 0420 02 Site :2211 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :2211 S 283rd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$116,700 Lgl :LOT 42 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,420 Ac:.21 YB:1968 Ph:206-941-059C *------------------------------ MetroScan / King : --------------------------------* Owner :Rieger Dennis S Parcel # :422220 0430 00 Site :2215 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :4622 Somerset Ct Kent Wa 98032 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$116,500 Lgl :LOT 43 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,930 Ac:.23 YB:1968 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *•-----=-------------------- ^'�_': MetroScan / King Owner :Porter Michael E Parcel # :422220 0440 08 Site :2218 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :2218 S 283rd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$123,100 Lgl :LOT 44 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,750 Ac:.17 YB:1968 Ph:206-941-0359 MetroScan / King • --------------------------------* Owner :White Susan R Parcel # :422220 0450 05 Site :2214 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :09/16/87 Mail :2214 S 283rd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$68,950 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$100,900 Lgl :LOT 45 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,260 Ac:.21 YB:1968 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Gorr Sally J Parcel # :422220 0460 03 Site :2210 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :10/26/92 Mail :2210 S 283rd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$119,950 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$108,300 Lgl :LOT 46 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,420 Ac:.17 YB:1968 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Burchfield James W Parcel # :422220 0470 01 Site :2204 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :2204 S 283rd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$109,600 Lgl :LOT 47 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,980 Ac:.19 YB:1968 Ph:206-839-2785 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Wilson Michael D Parcel # :422220 0480 09 Site :28217 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :03/17/87 Mail :28217 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$61,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$146,100 Lgl :LOT 48 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:2 B1dgSF:2,480 Ac:.16 YB:1968 Ph:206-941-5879 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King ._-----=------------------------* Owner :Gilbert Betty J Parcel # :422220 0490 07 Site :28301 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :PO Box 8243 Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$100,800 Lgl :LOT 49 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,280 Ac:.17 YB:1968 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King •------------------_.._---___--___- Owner :Brooks George A Parcel # :422230 0010 06 Site :2203 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :2203 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$103,800 Lgl :LOT 1 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 POR LY Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,150 Ac:.21 YB:1968 Ph:206-946-2419 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King : -----------------------------------* Owner :Rowland Milvin L Parcel # :422230 0020 04 Site :2209 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :10/08/86 Mail :2209 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$67,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$104,300 Lgl :LOT 1 & 2 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 POR Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,660 Ac:.17 YB:1969 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King : ------------------------------- Owner :Masters D C Parcel # :422230 0030 02 Site :2213 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :6804 185th Ave E Sumner Wa 98390 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$110,700 Lgl :LOT 2-3 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 POR 2 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,620 Ac:.21 YB:1969 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ^� *.-----=--------------------�I 1 : MetroScan / King :-- 7--------------------------* Owner :Estrada Lydia Parcel # :422230 0040 00 Site :2220 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :11/27/96 Mail :2220 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$127,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$115,000 Lgl :LOT 3-4 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 LOT 3 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,150 Ac:.18 YB:1969 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Hoff Robert D Parcel # :422230 0050 07 Site :2214 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :02/23/96 Mail :2214 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$117,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$105,800 Lgl :LOT 4-5 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 POR Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,620 Ac:.24 YB:1969 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Hines David A Parcel # :422230 0060 05 Site :2210 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :05/02/91 Mail :2210 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$121,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$111,800 Lgl :LOT 6 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,710 Ac:.17 YB:1970 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Nelsen Beverly Parcel # :422230 0070 03 Site :2204 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :12/02/92 Mail :2204 S 282nd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$104,400 Lgl :LOT 7 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,150 Ac:.19 YB:1968 Ph:206-839-2211 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King :---------_-----_____-----____--* Owner :Schmitz John A Parcel # :422230 0080 01 Site :28024 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :09/01/89 Mail :28024 27th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98002 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$94,700 Lgl :LOT 8 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:920 Ac:.20 YB:1970 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Taylor Edwin R Parcel # :422230 0090 09 Site :28020 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :10/11/85 Mail :945 S 293rd St Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$131,100 Lgl :LOT 9 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,590 Ac:.21 YB:1970 Ph:206-941-4044 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Dolezal William J Parcel # :422230 0100 07 Site :28016 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :08/21/92 Mail :28016 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$126,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$110,600 Lgl :LOT 10 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,710 Ac:.21 YB:1970 Ph:206-941-8582 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King :----__---- --_------_--_______-- Owner :Read John C Parcel # :422230 0110 05 Site :28012 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/30/94 Mail :28012 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$129,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$115,000 Lgl :LOT 11 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,710 Ac:.21 YB:1970 Ph:206-946-3507 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King : ------------------------------- Owner :Ingoglia Giuseppe/Savina Parcel # :422230 0120 03 Site :28008 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :03/14/97 Mail :28008 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$136,950 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$111,500 Lgl :LOT 12 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,710 Ac:.19 YB:1970 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. �\' 1--------------------------* *.-----=-------------------- MetroScan / King Owner :Blackburn Clyde A & Shirley M Parcel # :422230 0130 01 Site :28002 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :11/25/87 Mail :28002 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$98,100 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$145,200 Lgl :LOT 13 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.20 YB:1988 Ph:206-941-9271 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Stringer Phyllis M Parcel # :422230 0140 09 Site :27946 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :02/05/88 Mail :27946 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$147,100 Lgl :LOT 14 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,510 Ac:.18 YB:1988 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Anderson Thomas A D Parcel # :422230 0150 06 Site :27938 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :02/05/93 Mail :27938 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$1,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$123,800 Lgl :LOT 15 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,580 Ac:.17 YB:1977 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Hsu Scott Chin Lee Parcel # :422230 0160 04 Site :27937 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :03/16/89 Mail :12758 98th Pl NE Kirkland Wa 98034 Sale Price :$74,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$110,100 Lgl :LOT 16 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,170 Ac:.17 YB:1977 Ph:206-823-8583 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King : ------------------------------- Owner :Palisoc Venancio T Parcel # :422230 0170 02 Site :28003 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :28003 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$121,700 Lgl :LOT 17 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.19 YB:1977 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Carvo Matt J Parcel # :422230 0180 00 Site :28009 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :01/27/93 Mail :28009 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$120,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$121,200 Lgl :LOT 18 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/l / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.16 YB:1977 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Ohta Jonathan Y & Wennerlind Parcel # :422230 0190 08 Site :28015 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/07/96 Mail :9433 36th Ave SW Seattle Wa 98126 Sale Price :$105,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$121,600 Lgl :LOT 19 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.17 YB:1977 Ph:206-938-0319 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Naylor Thomas J & Judy A Parcel # :422230 0200 06 Site :28023 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/16/93 Mail :28023 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$121,600 Lgl :LOT 20 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.18 YB:1977 Ph:206-839-8118 MetroScan / King •------------------------------- Owner :Bubb John W Parcel # :422230 0210 04 Site :28029 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :04/17/92 Mail :28029 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$127,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$115,000 Lgl :LOT 21 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,050 Ac:.18 YB:1977 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *.-----s--------------------�-: MetroScan / King :----------------------------* Owner :Swan Arnold W & Sue Ann Parcel # :422230 0220 02 Site :28037 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :05/03/85 Mail :28037 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$69,950 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$127,600 Lgl :LOT 22 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,240 Ac:.18 YB:1977 Ph:206-941-8157 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King : ----------------------------------* Owner :Berg Merri Parcel # :422230 0230 00 Site :28043 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :28043 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$123,600 Lgl :LOT 23 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,510 Ac:.18 YB:1970 Ph:206-839-0492 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King •----------•-----------=-------------* Owner :Davis Timothy J Parcel # :422230 0240 08 Site :28203 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :08/17/89 Mail :28203 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$93,458 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$114,200 Lgl :LOT 24 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,620 Ac:.18 YB:1969 Ph:206-946-8761 *------------------------------• MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Giesbers James A & Catherine Parcel # :422230 0250 05 Site :28209 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :10/11/85 Mail :28908 52nd P1 S Auburn Wa 98001 Sale Price :$65,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$114,200 Lgl :LOT 25 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 4 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,150 Ac:.16 YB:1969 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Tyson -Winston Crystal Parcel # :422231 0400 03 Site :2031 S 280th P1 Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/28/96 Mail :2031 S 280th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$128,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$108,100 Lgl :LOT 40 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 5 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/l / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,590 Ac:.17 YB:1975 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Parker Richard L Parcel # :422231 0410 01 Site :2038 S 280th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :07/18/85 Mail :E650 Mason Lake Dr E Grapeview Wa 98546 Sale Price :$75,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$117,800 Lgl :LOT 41 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 5 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,220 Ac:.16 YB:1973 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King Owner :Seaver Mark R Parcel # :422231 0420 09 Site :2032 S 280th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/23/97 Mail :2032 S 280th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$60,941 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$117,600 Lgl :LOT 42 LAURELWOOD NORTH # 5 Q:SW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,220 Ac:.15 YB:1973 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Church Of God Holiness Parcel # :720480 0025 03 Site :27709 Military Rd S Federal Way Sale Date Mail :27709 Military Rd S 02875-00 Federal Way Wa 98002 Sale Price Use :407 Pub,Church,Religious Services Asd.V :$174,500 Lgl :LOT 5 REDONDO HEIGHTS UNREC VAL OF Q:NE S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,800 Ac:2.00 YB:1967 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King :-------------------------------* Owner :Kode Kalidas Y & Shubhada K Parcel # :720480 0026 02 Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :10/22/92 Mail :17415 7th Ave W Bothell Wa 98012 Sale Price :$43,000 Full Use :901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$42,500 Lgl :LOT 5 REDONDO HEIGHTS UNREC VAL OF Q:NE S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:3.10 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But is Not Guaranteed. *.-----=-------------------- MetroScan / King :-- )--------------------------* Owner :Parklane Ventures Inc Parcel # :720480 0030 06 Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :08/06/90 Mail :31620 23rd Ave S #320 Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$220,000 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$141,000 Lgl :LOT 6 REDONDO HEIGHTS UNREC POR OF Q:NE S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:6.39 YB: Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Highline Water District Parcel # :720480 0041 03 Site :2649 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Sale Date Mail :23828 30th Ave S Kent Wa 98032 Sale Price Use :622 Ind,Utilities,Public,Garage/Electri Asd.V :$56,800 Lgl :LOT 7 REDONDO HEIGHTS UNREC SWLY Q:NE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:1.00 YB: Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Jovich Michael A & Alice Parcel # :720480 0042 02 Site :*No Site Address* Federal Way Sale Date :02/09/90 Mail :24025 12th Ave S Des Moines Wa 98198 Sale Price :$95,000 Use :901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$96,000 Lgl :LOT 7 REDONDO HEIGHTS UNREC LOT 2 Q:NE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac:3.06 YB: Ph:206-824-5682 *------------------------------ • MetroScan / King . ------------------------------- Owner :Gandia Eddie L & Jean Agra-Ga Parcel # :746690 0150 01 Site :28411 26th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :10/03/96 Mail :28411 26th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$110,800 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$93,700 Lgl :LOT 15 RUSTIC VILLAGE ADD LESS C & Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,300 Ac:.21 YB:1962 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King •--------------__---____--_____-* Owner :Heritage Joy Ellen Parcel # :746690 0160 09 Site :28405 26th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :04/03/97 Mail Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$87,800 Lgl :LOT 16 RUSTIC VILLAGE ADD LESS C & Q:SE 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,000 Ac:.23 YB:1962 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Kolosky Daniel J Parcel # :757561 0440 04 Site :27841 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :02/22/94 Mail :27841 25th Dr S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$152,500 Lgl :LOT 44 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:2,250 Ac:.25 YB:1986 Ph:206-941-1312 *------------------------------ : MetroScan / King • ------------------------------- Owner :Ehlers William D/Kimberly Parcel # :757561 0450 01 Site :27847 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :02/25/97 Mail :27847 25th Dr S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$167,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$134,800 Lgl :LOT 45 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,680 Ac:.19 YB:1986 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Littlefield david A & Larson Parcel # :757561 0460 09 Site :27905 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :04/29/93 Mail :27905 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$158,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$133,200 Lgl :LOT 46 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,560 Ac:.15 YB:1986 Ph:206-839-6071 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King :_-__-_-_----------_____-______-* Owner :Jackson Brian K Parcel # :757561 0470 07 Site :27911 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :08/04/93 Mail :27911 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$157,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$133,300 Lgl :LOT 47 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,660 Ac:.12 YB:1986 Ph:206-941-8383 She Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan / King ----------------------------* Owner :Rustad Mark W & Erin G Parcel # :757561 0480 05 Site :27917 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :01/23/87 Mail :27919 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$113,159 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$162,200 Lgl :LOT 48 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/2 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:2,570 Ac::12 YB:1988 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King •-------------------------------* Owner :Williams Gil C & Bennett Petr Parcel # :757561 0490 03 Site :27923 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :11/26/86 Mail :27923 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$113,146 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$150,400 Lgl :LOT 49 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:2,580 Ac:.14 YB:1988 Ph:206-941-9316 *------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Schwarz Steven E;Mayfield-Schwarz Laurel Parcel # :757561 0500 01 Site :27929 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :03/17/97 Mail :27929 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$211,800 Lgl :LOT 50 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 TGW Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:2,580 Ac:.28 YB:1988 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Nguyen Hoang Manh Parcel # :757561 0510 09 Site :27928 22nd Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :01/12/96 Mail :27928 22nd Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$144,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$135,900 Lgl :LOT 51 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,620 Ac:.12 YB:1987 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Schulz Cathy C Parcel # :757561 0520 07 Site :2501 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/14/94 Mail :2501 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$148,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$132,900 Lgl :LOT 52 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,560 Ac:.19 YB:1987 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Beckett Barbara Parcel # :757561 0530 05 Site :2507 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :11/02/93 Mail :2507 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$142,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$137,400 Lgl :LOT 53 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 LESS Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,680 Ac:.12 YB:1987 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Jackson Claude Jr Parcel # :757561 0540 03 Site :2511 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :04/01/96 Mail :2511 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$132,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$113,400 Lgl :LOT 53 & 54 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,190 Ac:.17 YB:1986 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Daudet Joseph J & Wanda L Parcel # :757561 0550 00 Site :2515 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :12/12/86 Mail :2515 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$91,000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$134,700 Lgl :LOT 55 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,580 Ac:.13 YB:1986 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King : -------------------------------* Owner :Kish Jeffrey L & Kathy L Hatf Parcel # :757561 0560 08 Site :2521 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :10/12/95 Mail :2521 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$142,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$133,900 Lgl :LOT 56 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,680 Ac:.11 YB:1987 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *-----=--------------------� - MetroScan / King �---------------------------* Owner :Stallings Steven M & Stacey T Parcel # :757561 0570 06 Site :2527 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/27/95 Mail :2527 S 279th P1 Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$157,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$125,400 Lgl :LOT 57 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,660 Ac:.12 YB:1986 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Huseth Bruce E Parcel # :757561 0580 04 Site :2535 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :05/28/93 Mail :2535 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$138,112 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$127,200 Lgl :LOT 58 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 TGW Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,580 Ac:.14 YB:1986 Ph:206-839-7610 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King ---* Owner :Walter Craig P & Teri L Parcel # :757561 0590 02 Site :2539 S 279th P1 Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :02/02/93 Mail :2539 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$133,600 Lgl :LOT 59 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 TGW Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,920 Ac:.17 YB:1986 Ph:206-946-2139 *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Justo Benjamin B Parcel # :757561 0600 00 Site :2530 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :01/30/97 Mail :2530 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$133,700 Lgl :LOT 60 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,810 Ac:.14 YB:1986 Ph:206-839-7670 *------------------------------ • MetroScan / King : -------------------------------* Owner :Westrick Kenneth J Jr/Nancy P Parcel # :757561 0610 08 Site :2526 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :04/15/97 Mail :25459 22dn Ave S Des Moines Wa 98198 Sale Price :$155,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$124,000 Lgl :LOT 61 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,600 Ac:.11 YB:1986 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Millay Marjorie J Parcel # :757561 0620 06 Site :2522 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :03/24/92 Mail :2522 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$112,700 Lgl :LOT 62 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,190 Ac:.14 YB:1986 Ph:206-941-5028 *------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Rozier Stephen L & Monica R Parcel # :757561 0630 04 Site :2518 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :04/26/95 Mail :2518 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$153,400 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$133,600 Lgl :LOT 63 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,560 Ac:.13 YB:1987 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Jernigan Peggy M Parcel # :757561 0640 02 Site :2510 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :05/17/89 Mail :2510 S 279th Pl Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$109,948 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$132,800 Lgl :LOT 64 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,540 Ac:.14 YB:1987 Ph:206-946-4582 MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Shideler Mark C & Rhea L Parcel # :757561 0650 09 Site :27840 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :11/29/88 Mail :27840 25th Dr S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$99,876 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$137,800 Lgl :LOT 65 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,650 Ac:.12 YB:1988 Ph:206-941-5618 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. Fes•' -----'- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ - MetroScan / King . __ A------------- ---* Owner :Hurley Kathleen Parcel # :757561 0660 07 Site :27834 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :01/24/94 Mail :27834 25th Dr S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$119,400 Lgl :LOT 66 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,190 Ac:.11 YB:1987 Ph:206-839-9075 *------------------------------• MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Foyer Craig Allen & Lisa Ann Parcel # :757561 0670 05 Site :27830 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :11/20/92 Mail :27830 25th Dr S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$138,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$139,400 Lgl :LOT 67 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,770 Ac:.11 YB:1986 Ph:206-839-2310 *------------------------------• MetroScan / King •--_---------------------------_--_* Owner :Barnes Richard A & Elizabeth Parcel # :757561 0680 03 Site :27824 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :04/01/92 Mail :27824 25th Dr S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$107,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$119,100 Lgl :LOT 68 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:1,190 Ac:.12 YB:1987 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Cole Robert L Jr Parcel # :757561 0690 01 Site :27818 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :02/08/88 Mail :27818 25th Dr S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$137,800 Lgl :LOT 69 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,770 Ac:.12 YB:1986 Ph:206-839-8453 *------------------------------• MetroScan / King •------------- — _---_-_--__---__* Owner :Taylor Myung Soo & Jae Ock Parcel # :757561 0700 09 Site :27812 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :06/05/91 Mail :27812 25th Dr S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$124,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$129,400 Lgl :LOT 70 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:1,430 Ac:.18 YB:1988 Ph: * ------------------------------ • MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Langlume Linda S & Browman Peter Parcel # :757561 0710 07 Site :27808 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :12/08/88 Mail :27808 25th Dr S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$108,948 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$134,700 Lgl :LOT 71 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO. 02 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:1,650 Ac:.16 YB:1988 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King • -------------------------------* Owner :Chea Lee/Kosal Parcel # :757562 0610 07 Site :27928 21st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :04/25/97 Mail :27928 21st Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$156,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$149,400 Lgl :LOT 61 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO 03 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:l B1dgSF:2,110 Ac:.14 YB:1989 Ph: * ------------------------ —._....—: MetroScan / King •-------------------------------* Owner :Behrbaum Zon L & Angelina C Parcel # :757562 0630 03 Site :27920 21st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :11/27/89 Mail :27920 21st Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$144,353 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$171,200 Lgl :LOT 63 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO 03 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,640 Ac:.13 YB:1989 Ph: *------------------------------ MetroScan / King •-------------------------------* Owner :Yoon Thomas S Parcel # :757562 0640 01 Site :27916 21st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Sale Date :04/30/96 Mail :27916 21st Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Sale Price :$165,000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$160,600 Lgl :LOT 64 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO 03 Q:NW S:33 T:22N R:04E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l B1dgSF:2,280 Ac:.15 YB:1989 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. t----- '----------------------- F-: MetroScan / King Owner :Villaruz Benedict V & Diane H Site :27912 21st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mail :27912 21st Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :LOT 65 SCARBOROUGH DIV NO 03 Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:2 B1dgSF:2,070 .- ---------------------------- Parcel # :757562 0650 08 Sale Date :06/05/92 Sale Price Asd.V :$155,200 Q:NW 5:33 T:22N R:04E Ac:.15 YB:1989 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. M E T R O S C A N Reference Farm King (WA) Owner Address Phone Ref Number --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adams Rodney R;Candace L 2311 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 53 Anderson Thomas A D 27938 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 102 Artz Brenton T 2211 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 206-941-0590 80 Barnes Edward L;Sharon A 2227 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 206-839-9238 49 Barnes Richard A;Elizabeth 27824 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 147 Beckett Barbara 2507 S 279th P1 Federal Way 98003 132 Behrbaum Zon L;Angelina C 27920 21st Ave S Federal Way 9800 152 Bennett Ralph A;Anna M 2508 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 206-941-9181 28 Berg Merri 28043 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-839-0492 110 Blackburn Clyde A;Shirley M 28002 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-941-9271 100 Boutelle William D;Melissa 2312 S 285th P1 Federal Way 98002 206-927-0233 61 Brewer E H 28221 27th Ave S Federal Way 9800 14 Briggs Richard A;Marisel N *No Site Address* Federal Way 30 Brooks George A 2203 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 206-946-2419 88 Brown Charles E 28101 29th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-941-4132 42 Brush Peter G;Perrault Lesl *No Site Address* Federal Way 35 Brush Peter G;Perrault Lesl 28422 Military Rd S Federal Way 9 37 Bubb John W 28029 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 108 Burchfield James W 2204 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 206-839-2785 85 Burns Sally 2221 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 206-839-0592 72 Bush Robert B *No Site Address* Federal Way 206-941-4444 10 Bush Robert B *No Site Address* Federal Way 206-941-4444 11 Bush Robert B 2712 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 206-941-4444 9 Carvo Matt J 28009 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 105 Chea Lee;Kosal 27928 21st Ave S Federal Way 9800 151 Christensen James;Betty J 2325 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 206-368-8490 55 Church Of God Holiness 27709 Military Rd S Federal Way 116 Cole Robert L Jr 27818 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 206-839-8453 148 Conner Jimmy D 28210 27th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-839-5014 2 Cripe Clarence G 28312 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 78 Cunio Anthony R;Pamela A 28104 29th Ave S Federal Way 9800 48 Daudet Joseph J;Wanda L 2515 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 134 Davis Timothy J 28203 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-946-8761 ill Demers Harrison H 28434 Military Rd S Federal Way 9 206-941-0234 33 Dolezal William J 28016 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-941-8582 97 Ehlers William D;Kimberly 27847 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 124 Estrada Lydia 2220 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 91 Evans A Wiley;Heidi M 2224 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 73 Felho Sandor D 28100 28th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-529-0219 3 Forks Judson D;Shannon D 2516 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 27 Foyer Craig Allen;Lisa Ann 27830 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 206-839-2310 146 Gandia Eddie L;Jean Agra-Ga 28411 26th Ave S Federal Way 9800 121 Geib Frank E;Rita M 28241 27th Ave S Federal Way 9800 17 Giesbers James A;Catherine 28209 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 112 Gilbert Betty J 28301 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 87 Gorr Sally J 2210 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 84 Grow Donald C 2235 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 50 Hamilton Kenneth H 28425 Military Rd S Federal Way 9 32 Hancock Timothy R;Kelli M 2220 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 74 Henderson Marvin E;Karen L 28433 Old Military Rd S Federal W 31 Heritage Joy Ellen 28405 26th Ave S Federal Way 9800 122 Highline Water District 2649 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 9 119 Hines David A 2210 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 93 Hoff Robert D 2214 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 92 Houser Elizabeth M 2318 S 285th Pl Federal Way 98002 206-946-5580 60 Hsu Scott Chin Lee 27937 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-823-8583 103 Hurley Kathleen 27834 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 206-839-9075 145 Huseth Bruce E 2535 S 279th P1 Federal Way 98003 206-839-7610 137 Ingoglia Giuseppe;Savina 28008 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 99 Jackson Brian K 27911 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-941-8383 126 Jackson Claude Jr 2511 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 133 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. M E T R O S C A N Reference Farm King (WA) Owner Address Phone Ref Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jernigan Peggy M 2510 S 279th P1 Federal Way 98003 206-946-4582 143 Jovich Michael A;Alice *No Site Address* Federal Way 206-824-5682 120 Justo Benjamin B 2530 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 206-839-7670 139 Kish Jeffrey L;Kathy L Hatf 2521 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 135 Kode Kalidas Y;Shubhada K *No Site Address* Federal Way 117 Kolosky Daniel J 27841 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 206-941-1312 123 Lakehaven Utility District *No Site Address* Federal Way 39 Lakehaven Utility District 28405 Military Rd S Federal Way 9 36 Langlume Linda S;Browman Pe 27808 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 150 Lee Kellie Sam;Khieng Huot 2333 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 56 Leisure Monroe E 2612 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 206-941-0165 19 Lewis Robert D;Janet S 2216 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 75 Littlefield david A;Larson 27905 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-839-6071 125 Lukyamuzi John A;Gladys N 2317 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 206-839-5002 54 Mark John J;Anne *No Site Address* Federal Way 206-874-6551 20 Masters D C 2213 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 90 Mercado Virginia C 2232 S 285th P1 Federal Way 98002 206-941-1817 65 Millay Marjorie J 2522 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 206-941-5028 141 Monsen Joseph K 28247 27th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-941-7398 18 Mungra Dungar D 2240 S 285th P1 Federal Way 98002 64 Murray Michael F Jr 2303 S 284th P1 Federal Way 98003 206-946-8803 52 Naylor Thomas J;Judy A 28023 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-839-8118 107 Nellum William;Patricia Ann 2243 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 51 Nelsen Beverly 2204 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 206-839-2211 94 Nelson L Marilee Est 28103 28th Ave S Federal Way 9800 4 Nguyen Hoang Manh 27928 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 130 Ohta Jonathan Y;Wennerlind 28015 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-938-0319 106 Palisoc Venancio T 28003 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 104 Palmer Arley F 28114 28th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-941-2296 46 Parker Richard L 2038 S 280th P1 Federal Way 98003 114 Parklane Ventures Inc *No Site Address* Federal Way 118 Parks Catherine L 28108 28th Ave S Federal Way 9800 47 Pecak Jan;Jitka 28427 Old Military Rd S Auburn 98 38 Peterson Darlene J 2339 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 57 Peterson Russell;B 28045 28th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-839-2616 7 Porter Michael E 2218 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 206-941-0359 82 Prine Timothy A 2218 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 67 Read John C 28012 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-946-3507 98 Rieger Dennis S 2215 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 81 Robbins Mark R 2505 S 284th St Auburn 98003 206-839-2546 41 Roland Earl B;Tracey L 2224 S 284th P1 Federal Way 98003 66 Roll Jr Nelson E;Sheri W 28236 Military Rd S Federal Way 9 206-941-2912 24 Ronish Randall L 28122 28th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-946-0473 45 Rowland Milvin L 2209 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 89 Rozier Stephen L;Monica R 2518 S 279th P1 Federal Way 98003 142 Rudzinski John 2324 S 285th P1 Federal Way 98002 206-839-8844 59 Rustad Mark W;Erin G 27917 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 127 Schmitt James M 2502 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 29 Schmitz John A 28024 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 95 Schulz Cathy C 2501 S 279th P1 Federal Way 98003 131 Schwarz Steven E;Mayfield-S 27929 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 129 Seatz David 0 H Sr;Mary L 2213 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 70 Seaver Mark R 2032 S 280th P1 Federal Way 98003 115 Seis Davis F;Janice R *No Site Address* Federal Way 206-271-8864 23 Shideler Mark C;Rhea L 27840 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 206-941-5618 144 Sorenson Joe;Patsy 28039 28th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-839-4072 6 Stallings Steven M;Stacey T 2527 S 279th P1 Federal Way 98003 136 Stevens Guy C 28204 27th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-839-2890 1 Stringer Phyllis M 27946 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 101 Stuart Michael J;Stephanie 2205 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 68 Stuckey Kevin D;Michelle K 2300 S 285th Pl Federal Way 98002 63 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. M E T R O S C A N Reference Farm Owner Swan Arnold W;Sue Ann Sykes Elizabeth Taing Lee Jane;Chen Li Gang Taylor Edwin R Taylor Myung Soo;Jae Ock Tkachuk Anatoliy Trevino Laura Lee Tyson -Winston Crystal Venable Thomas C;Hyrna A Villaruz Benedict V;Diane H Walker Elaine K Walker Grant A;Teresa Walker Grant A;Yuskoff Tere Walter Craig P;Teri L Warren Donald W Warrior Longhair Wattum Donald L Wattum Donald L Webb Keith T;Et All Westrick Kenneth J Jr;Nancy White Susan R Whitehead Harold W Whitish Bruce D;Elaine J Whitman Carrie;Mitchell Et Wicks Matthew T;Tanya Williams Gil C;Bennett Petr Wilson Michael D Wilson Thomas E;Dee J Wise Huey Paul Wozniak Kerry;Standlee Sand Yoon Thomas S Young Ronald L King (WA) Address Phone Ref Number --------------------------------------------------------------- 28037 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-941-8157 109 2306 S 285th Pl Federal Way 98002 62 2720 S 282nd St Federal Way 98003 8 28020 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-941-4044 96 27812 25th Dr S Federal Way 98003 149 *No Site Address* Federal Way 5 2204 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 77 2031 S 280th Pl Federal Way 98003 113 2217 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 71 27912 21st Ave S Federal Way 9800 154 28224 Military Rd S Federal Way 9 206-839-4288 22 *No Site Address* Federal Way 12 28213 27th Ave S Federal Way 9800 13 2539 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 206-946-2139 138 2212 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 206-941-5324 76 2604 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 25 28233 27th Ave. S Federal Way 9800 206-839-3079 16 28229 27th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-839-3079 15 2205 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 206-850-3077 79 2526 S 279th Pl Federal Way 98003 140 2214 S 283rd St Federal Way 98003 83 2330 S 284th Pl Federal Way 98003 206-839-4932 58 27606 S 284th St Federal Way 9800 206-839-3754 26 *No Site Address* Federal Way 40 28216 Military Rd S Federal Way 9 21 27923 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-941-9316 128 28217 22nd Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-941-5879 86 28404 Military Rd S Federal Way 9 34 28128 28th Ave S Federal Way 9800 206-946-2647 44 2209 S 284th St Federal Way 98003 69 27916 21st Ave S Federal Way 9800 153 28105 29th Ave S Federal Way 9800 43 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. Cr" cP `- 33530 First Way South ® Federal Way WA 98003 \} Phone (206) 661-4000 1, EiNVMO 1 a NTAL CFMI CKLIST F' Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmentai agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of Checklist for Non -project Proposals: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -project Actions (part D). For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and property or site should be read as proposal, proposer, "affected affected geographic area, respectively. 19 TO BE COWLETED BY APPLICANT 2 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: HERITAGE WOODS DIV..I - TRACTS H & J 2. Name of applicant: PARKLANE VENTURES, INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 31620 23rd Ave. S. ##320 Contact: David Morrison Federal Way, WA 98003 General Manager Tele. (206)946-3652 4. Date checklist prepared: F,ev. 10/3/97 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): MAY, 1998 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. 2 ,i. Construction of 7 single-family homes on subdivided and - developed lots within Tracts H & J. 8. List any environmental .information you know about that has been prepared, or will be FL prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Engineering Report -submitted by :;dim Johnson of Golder Associates and tree evaluation by Roger Del Moral, Biologist. i 3 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Approved plans to staUlize the existing roadway bank. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Grading Application. Final Subdivision approval and recording of 7 lots within Tracts H & J. 4uC{s Single Family Building Permits. ti R Or 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and t€ie size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Fill compact ,•andlon•-.sbmet-lots, retain with engineer designed retainir. wa�, seven single family lots, within Tracts H & J of the plat of Heritage Woods. DIV. 1. Tract H contains 16,111 sa. ft. and is approved for two single family lots (preliminary approved Lots 52 & 53) Tract J contains 43, 120 sq. ft. and is approved for 5 single ---family lots (preliminary approved lots 54-58). 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. East side of 26th Ave. So. and DIV. I, all within Section 33, W.M. See proposed grading plan 25th Ave. So. in Heritage Woods Township 22 North, Range 4 East. attached as Exhibit "AF'. ! IN 4 B. ENWR ONMENTAL ELP EN'TS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, tepa slvra , mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 40% c. What general types of soils are. found on the site (for example, clay, sand, ;ravel, peat, mulc:h)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. ALDERWOOD Series. Sandy, gravelly loam. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes, constructed road bank had sluffed in last winter's rain���„�;�f and are being stabilized under a separate, approved plan. .yLO�wy e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. wo To create relatively flat building areas and yards within each lot. There will be approximately .30,000 cubic feet of soil excavated from the area south of DIV. I shown as Tract G, and hauled, placed and compacted within each tract as per Exhibit "A''. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. During excavation and prior to compaction of the fill, erosion could occur. However, the work will be started and completed as cue operatio in dry weather in May or June, to reduce likelyhood of erosion. The filled areas will be hydroseed to prevent erosion after compaction of the fill section. 5 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 35% - 40% of each lot will be covered with driveways and building area. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Start and complete total fill and compaction operation in May or June, with dry weather. All lots will be filled and compacted as one operation. Silt fencing will be placed around the downhill construction limits. 47ct; 1w, 'f 2. AIR u9I y ■+ a. What types of emissions to the air would result &o-m the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Diesel fumes from consturction equipment, and slight dust if weather too dry. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Nkrev c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Water excavation and fill sections if dusty. C 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Type Two wetlands adjacent to Tracts H & J. All wetlands drain to the north into an existing pond. Then into a developed storm detention pond, then into a stream and eventually into Poverty Bay, Puget Sound. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. See Exhibit "All Grading Plan. Work will be performed up to the 100 ft. buffer for Wetland "F". to 6 'id dr c- , J ri LC)L)1 D( 't-i )(i" 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed 2n or removed s from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be - affected. Indicate the source of fill material. r' No fill or dredge material would be placed or removed from surface water or wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year fioodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 7 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn. Surface water will be controlled by landscaping and drainage pipe to be discharged into the adjacent wetlands at controlled locations. See Exhibit "A". �� �,�;,, : t'.-`� 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks.��.w or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the�,� yr following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, {�{ the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or 4.PP11'V the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. h1 /, w None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water). 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Each lot contains a yard drain stub —out which will be connected to all on —lot drainage from driveways and down —spouts on each house. lot drainage will be connected to a new "rear yard" � drainage system that will be installed in the new fill. This new rear yard system will be connected to the existing drainage system between lots 53 & 54. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No, unless homeowners dump oil or paint into yard drains. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Connect all -downspouts and footing drains to storm drainage system. All storm drainage behind rock retaining wall would be collected in drainage pipe and discharged into wetland areas at controlled locations, but primarily intc the existing drainage system. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. ® deciduousXtree:r, aole )aspen, other ❑ ev rareen dar, pine, other shrubs ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plant: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? t Some Alder and Maple trees will be removed and replaced with formal landscaping in front and rear yards. y i c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None 9 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Lawns and shrubs and trees to be planted and maintained -by each,4. homeowner of each lot. Vbe, 5. ANIMALS 14 a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. �. birds: hawk, heron, eagle, on birds other: Geese'}�vP3A mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Landscape yard areas after construction of grading and home construction. �L L . 10 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas for Home heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. All lots are northwest down, hill lots, will not affect southwest orientation of adjacent homes. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. All homes built to current City of Federal Way, and H.U.D. standards. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire or police may be called if there are accidents or acts of vandalism. 11 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. Employ licensed and bonded contractors to minimize risk of accidents. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Airport and freeway noise. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment operating from 7 a.m. to`5 p.m. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. (4L Restrict work hours from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. S. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant. Existing single family homes are over 500 feet away from closest tract and lots to be graded and filled. 12 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Single family residential. r r f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single family residential. c g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Upland residential. 13 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. Portions of Tract J have been designated sensitive due ;,lc to steep area as shown on Exhibit "C". . � �L � 5u i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 7 households, one houshold per lot. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. Obtain grading and fill permit from City of Federal Way to ensure project complies with all current regulations. 9. HOUSING 0 W. {) �,pv k ul LO' a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether higti middle, or low-income housing. 7 single family homes to be built on graded lots. Housing prices would be high, middle income, over $200.0.00 per home. 14 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None. Heritage Woods was approved for 111 single family lots, and the two tracts with 7 homes within them are part of the 111 Lots and homes approved. Number and density of housing is iow�being increased by this application. .�f► fr � 10. AESTHETICSr a. What is the tallest height of any proposed sixucture(s), not including antennas; what is v r,; 4 IiP1 the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? "� 30 feet from finished grade of lots. Jblu_) Wood. V1 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. All uphill lots adjacent to the down hill tracts H & J, and 7 lots are all high enough to view over the future lots and homes. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Architectural controls will be included in the recorded covenents, conditions and restrictions, to ensure harmonious quality design and building materials. 15 11. LIGHT AND ' GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glare from windows from morning and afternoon sun, observable from east of site b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. None. 12. RECREATION a. What designated formal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A 4 acre park s.b ing dedicated to the City of Federal Way by the applican The applicant will develop a graded, irrigated and lawn area within the park, for passive recreational use. 4.%J 16 b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. Dedicate and improve the park within Heritage Woods to the standards of the City of Federal Way Park Department. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Old Military Road once bisected the site. New Military Road has been developed to the east of the site, and Old Military Road has been vacated, and the land has been incorporated into the lots and new road system within Heritage Woods. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None. 17 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Military Road, Star Lake Road and b. Is the site currently served by public transit? to the nearest transit stop? Interstate 5. p r If not, what is the approximate distance Yes. 20 feet from entrance to Heritage Woods and 1000 feet to Tracts H & J and proposed graded.-�Iots. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? rem 2 off-street parking spaces per lot, spaces for the project. or 14 off-street parking Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. All roads and storm, sanitary sewer and water distribution was installed to and within Tracts H & J to service the seven lots to be contained within Tracts H &'J. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Private vehicles will be primary source of transportation. Home owners will utilize transit for commuting and air for regional, national and international travel. r 18 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 10 trips per household or 70 trips for the 7 completed homes on the 7 graded lots. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Install new transit stop and pad near entrance to Heritage Woods. Advise new home —owners of available transit facilities and schedules. �J1 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for -public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, if accidents or natural disasters occur. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. -Fully develop the project with all roads and storm facilities to the standards of the City of Federal Way, complete with sidewalks and street lighting and street signs. 19 16. UTILITIFS ' a. C' utilities currents ble at the site • electricity natural gas water refuse service telephon sanitary sewer septic system, other (please list). Cablevision, treet Lights. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Road & Storm — City of Federal Way Sanitary Sewer — Lakehaven Utility .Dist. Water Distribution - Lakehaven Utility Dist. Electricity/Street Lights - Puget Power Natural Gas - Washington Natural Gas Co. Cablevision - T.C.I. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature:�`��� Date Submitted: lGfi-7/�, AFFIDAVIT OFPUBL:'CATION No. F87 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. I, Paulie LaFreniere, being first duly swom on oath deposes and says: That she is the Advertising Manager for The Federal Way News, a bi-weekly newspaper which is now and at all times herein mentioned has been published and printed in an office maintained at the place of publication at Federal Way, King County, Washington, that by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for King County, said newspaper is now and at all times mentioned herein has been approved as a legal newspaper for the publication of any advertisement, notice, summons, report, proceedings, or other official document required by law to be published, that said newspaper was published regularly at least once each week, in the English language, as a newspaper of general circulation in Federal Way, King County, Washington, at the time of application to the aforementioned Superior Court for approval as a legal newspaper, and was so published for at least six months prior to the date of said publication, and is now and at all times mentioned herein has been so published. That the annexed is a true copy of amity of Fed WU Notice of Land use application as it was published in regular issues of said newspapers once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 3rd day of January. 1997, and ending on the 3rd day of January, 1997 both dates inclusive, and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers and as a newspaper of general circulation during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 4$ 1.13 Subscribed and sworn t efore me this 7th day of January,1998 ^ Nofary P u b I i c in and for the State of Washington Residing at Seattle. My commission expires 09/01/01- NarICE OF L,4NQ The t1SE APPLICATIpN City of Federal Way's Department °f Community Department Services has received an a Heritage an pplid rW Modify dilipns and #Preliminary Plat to allow the con - and grading of appo all filling cubic yards of material ately 25,pt]Q and J of at in entage Woods r[?ivis onclSat Ppe So y 28Q00 Mock of 25th Place ay w in Federal Way WA. Fed_ are Way life numbers for the Project The ollO 09 d a an UPFi97-OCU ppp3 Milled in conjunct on eats were sub - ton: Geptechoical Ewith the aPPlica- by Golder Associat3 neering Peporl esn vey, and SEPA Checklist Vegetation Sur_ application will be reviawed for compliance with the Zoning Chapter he of the Federal Way City Code and {SEPq} The a the State Environmental Policy Act pplication complete on December 10, as deemed Any person or 1997. pressing an intereslblic agency ex - is invited to sub this application to Gfe mil written comments Gregory D. Moore, AICP. Commu_ pity Aevelppment Services Director, by January t7, f998. Only those persons that submit written CO Services. Or those rrreevelpnts to the Di- rector of Community Dpment who specificaily re_ quest a COPY Of the tinal dem appeal file directors ay r deCisicn.cisc'sion, The of- ficial file is available for review at the Department of Community Deveiop- ment Services, 33530 f ments st Way South , Federal Way WA 9,3003. Written ouch may be submitt dress. For further- ed r' information this ad - on the r b e Project, contact Jim Harris, Sen- lanner, at (253) 661.4019. Put}Iished in the Federal on January 3, 1998, Way News F87 CITY OF C� 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH February 11, 1998 ~F NED BY OOMMUNil,,,; FIt]r��jE�iTp�nnoT�AFAJ'� (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 Mr. David Morrison Via Fax: 946-3580 Parklane Ventures, Inc. 31620 - 23rd Avenue South, #320 Federal Way, WA 98003 Subject. Heritage Woods Tracts H and J Slope Grading (SEP97-0001) Related File No.'s SUB92-0005, BLD95-0711 Release Agreement and Maintenance Bond No. 97-1004 Dear Mr. Morrison: I recently spoke with John Zipper, Regional Manager with Giles Engineering regarding stabilization of the slopes within Tracts H and J of subject development. Per Mr. Zipper's comments, the slopes have been stabilized to further reduce the chance of additional slides. Stabilization of the slopes does not constitute approval to develop the lots; a separate review process, i.e., SEPA and Use Process Review, is currently underway and must be completed prior to additional filling and development of Tracts H & J. Upon receipt of a fully executed agreement and maintenance bond by Schneider Homes, Inc., the City will release Bond 97-1004. This bond is related to clearing, grading, and erosion control within Division 1 of subject plat. If you have any questions, please call me at (253) 661-4109. Sincerely Stephen R. Cl i , CP Development Services Manager Original to follow by mail SRC:jg cc: rm Harris, Associate Planner Lisa Read, Contract Engineering Plans Reviewer Jim Pryal, Construction Inspector Jim Jaeger, 9419 S. 204th Place, Kent, WA 98031 Patrick J. Hillyer, 10500 N.E. Eighth, Suite 400, Bellevue, WA., 98004 Bond/Assgn File Project File Day File L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENTISUB92 00.05\MB971004.DOC s CITY OF Y 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH January 22, 1998 David Morrison Parklane Ventures, Inc. 31620 - 23rd Avenue South, #320 Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 Subject: Il eritage Woods - File No's SUB92-0005, BLD95-0711 Release Remaining Agreement and Maintenance Bond No. 97-1005 Dear Mr. Morrison: The City has received an executed agreement and maintenance bond from Schneider Homes, Inc. (Principal), to ensure maintenance for certain development associated with Heritage Woods Phase I. The following lists the number, type, dollar amount and maintenance requirements of the bond. 1. AGREEMENT AND MAINTENANCE BOND NO. 98-1007 (ON SITE ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS) Bond Amount = $169,975.00 The principal has entered into an agreement with the City to maintain and guarantee against defective materials and workmanship in the construction of on -site roadway and drainage improvements. The submittal of the above document allows the full release of your existing Agreement and Maintenance Bond which also ensures maintenance as described above. As such, the City of Federal Way hereby authorizes the release of the following: 1. AGREEMENT AND MAINTENANCE BOND (ON SITE ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Bond Amount: $169,975.00 Federal Way File No. 97-1005, Safeco Insurance Company of America account 95874231. The administrative cash deposit amount associated with the above bond is $4,249.00. A check will be sent to you shortly for this amount. Thank you for your assistance in the completion of this project. If you havev-my questions, call me at (253) 661-4109. C11 Developmen"ervices Manager SCJg c: Tim Harris, Associate Planner Lisa Read, Engineering Consultant Julie Venn, Engineering Plans Reviewer Jim Jaeger, 9419 S. 204th Place, Kent, WA 98031 Safeco Ins. Co. of America, c/o Mary A. Dobbs, Hurley, Atkins & Stewart, Inc., 1800 - 9th Ave., Suite 1500, Seattle, WA 98101 Bond File Day File L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENT\SUB92-00.05\BDASGNFR.4 RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVFLOPMFNT DEPARTMENT JAN 2 6 1998 Heritage Woods Tracts H and J - Filling and Grading January 1998 Federal Way CityMap SCALE 1:5995 We: This map is Wented for use as a graphical representation only. The 0fy of FVderel Way makes no warranty as to 1ts accuracy. F RECEIVED BY O0MMU IITY nEVFI OPMENT DEPARTMENT Tax, Business and Financial Consultants J -2 2 1990 K.Y. KODE & ASSOCIATES January 21, 1998 Mr. Gregory D. Moore AICP Community Development Services Director City of Federal Way 33530, 1st Way South Federa Way, Wa 98003-6210 Dear Mr. Moore: Ref No.: Property Tax Account No. 720480-0026-02 I have received the attached notice as of yesterday as it was mailed to my old address and then forwarded to my new address. Please correct your records with my new address as follows: 1625, 204th Place N. E. Redmond, WA 98053-4421 I am concerned about the filling and grading of Tracts H and J of Heritage Woods Division I. I like to know the adverse effects of this development to my property in regards to the land slide and water drainage etc. Please contact me at 206-325-1725 for setting up the meeting according to your schedule. I may bring my Geotechnical Consultant with me to discuss these issues. Sincerely yours, K. Y. Ko e Owner of the Property Encl. P.O. Box 20692 • 1661 East Olive Way 0 Seattle, Washington 98102.1692 • Phone (206) 325-1725 CITjFjC- 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION The City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services has received an application to modify Heritage Woods preliminary plat conditions #6 and #7 to allow the filling and grading of approximately 25,000 cubic yards of material within Tracts H and J of Heritage Woods Division I, at approximately the 28000 block of 25th Place South in Federal Way, WA. Federal Way file numbers for the project are SEP97-0001 and UPR97-0003. The following documents were submitted in conjunction with the application: Geotechnical Engineering Report by Golder Associates, Vegetation Survey, and SEPA Checklist. The application will be reviewed for compliance with the Zoning Chapter (18) of the Federal Way City Code and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The application was deemed complete on December 10, 1997. Any person or public agency expressing an interest in this application is invited to submit written comments to Gregory D. Moore AICP, Community Development Services Director, by January 19, 1998. Only those persons that submit written comments to the Director of Community Development Services, or those who specifically request a copy of the final decision, may appeal the director's decision. The official file is available for review at the Department of Community Development Services, 33530 1st Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Written comments may be submitted to this address. For further information on the above project, contact Jim Harris Senior Planner, at (253) 661-4019. L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENTNSEP97-00.01\CheLNOT.DOC Heritage Woods Tracts H and J - Fi I I i ng and Grading ' Federal Way CityMap SCALE 1:5995 January 1998 1Vofe: tltrs rnap is itaientedforuse as a gra rcal represen[ation only. the C7ty of ICe�fera! Way makes no warran yl as [a iGs eccxlracy. to V 0 I to 0 1 co CD ! / < 53" co co _o w N p w 0 a CD ph71ZF rnQ000 C1N C1-ICJ XUIrnHm o -D Z -CI- 17IU UI O fA f.r m IH Z z U-6 .o MD my goo or I- UI ON UIZ "Iglu Im o .r ZIX .r MQ IU i r r DUI Ci.O C7 4 m MF- fA O' O r r J m GILES' ENGINEERING l 1SSOCIATES, INC Atlanta, GA GEOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONSULTANTS • • Dallas, TX RECEIVED BY • Los Angeles, CA COMVIUI1J'r1'DCV�I.OKIENrCiEpARTMENf • Madison, WI • Milwaukee, Wl January 21 1998 • Seattle, WA �"o • Washington, D.C. ,},k City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003-6210 Attention: Stephen Clifton, Development Services Manager Subject: ct: Ge l Engineering Reviev� of Slope Grading Proposal_ .�uv�.. �. oteclunica. L. Heritage Woods, Tract H and J of Division 1, Lots 52 through 58 Federal Way, Washington Project No. 6G-9707028 Dear Mr. Clifton: This letter presents the opinions and conclusions of Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. regarding geotechnical engineering considerations for development of the referenced residential lots, as noted on plan sheets 1 and 2 of "Heritage Woods, Tract H and J, Lot Grading Plan'', by Jaeger Engineering, revision date 12/9/97. These conclusions were reached based upon information dev,;loped by: • Review of inspection reports from temporary stabilization in Fall 1997 provided by Golder Associates, Inc.; • Review of information in Golder Associates, Inc. geotechnical engineering report dated November 17, 1997, titled "Analysis and Results of Slope Stabilization Work, Tract H and J of Division 1, Preliminary Lots 52 through 58, Heritage Woods, Federal Way, Washington"; • Observation of soil conditions on site during excavation of test pits by the project contractor on ()Ictober 15, 1997; S Engineering analysis. Authorization for these services was provided in your letter of January 8, 1998. which authorized our scope of services dated December 22, 1997, as an amendment to our Professional Services Agreement for Geotechnical Engineering Review Services, dated August 6, 1997. The purpose of these services was limited to an evaluation of earthwork and foundation construction proposed by the project developer for the referenced site, based upon the information provided to us. This letter is an instrument of service, and the conclusions presented herein have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the held of geotecimical engineering. No other warranty is ei'dier expressed or implied. This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Federal. Way, for specific application to the slatted purpose and site. 11807 North Creek Parkway South • Suite 102 • Bothell, WA 98011 425/482-2020 • Fax 425/482-6300 • E-Mail seattle@gilesengr.com GILES ENGINEERING (ASSOCIATES, INC. City of Federal Way Project No. 6G-9707028 January 21, 1998 Page 2 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Our letter dated August 25, 1997 provides a description of the project site and conditions. Subsequent to that letter, the developer completed temporary stabilization of portions of the project site during October 1997. The Golder Associates report dated November 17, 1997 describes the temporary stabilization. The site conditions were evaluated by Golder Associates, Inc. following the slope failures, fbr the purpose of providing options for lot grading �a.nd constt actin n. Golder Associates provided three geotechnical reports which were supplied to us by the City for review. These reports were dated June 23, July 14, and November 17, 1997. The June 23, 1997 report includes information regarding soil and groundwater conditions, including the logs of six test pits excavated on June 15, 1997. The July 14 report container a summary of grading alternatives for lots 52 through 58, which were based on configurations of the lots such as setbacks, slopes, and grades provided by Schneider Homes. The November 17 report includes description of temporary slope repair work, additional investigation results on Lots 53 and 54, slope stability analysis on lot 54 using recent exploration data, and recommendations for additional lot grading. The Jaeger Engineer grading plan reviewed for this study reflects the geotechnical recommendations of Golder Associates' November 17, 1997 report. Site conditions were observed by a geologist from our firm on October 15, 1997. The purpose of this reconnaissance was to evaluate soil conditions in test pits excavated in fill within the embankment side slope on lots 53 and 54. The test pits encountered a significant quantity and depth of very loose, wet to saturated fill within the embankment side slope. The fill consisted of silty sand with gravel. The fill beneath the roadway prism was found to be relatively dense, based on information in the Golder Associates' report and our observations. As a part of this review, we reviewed plan sheets 1 and 2 by Jaeger Engineering, dated October 8, 19°7, with -revision d^ted December 9, 1997 for sheet 1. The plan sheets contain general notes, a detail for interceptor trench drain construction, fill specifications, and cross -sections through lots 52 through 58 indicating existing grades and proposed final lot grades. In general, the proposed lot grades will result in fill depths of up to 20 feet on portions of the lots. The toe of fill extends up to 45 feet east of the existing property line. The toe of fill is proposed to be retained by a reinforced fill and rockery at lots 57 and 58. Fill slopes are designed for a 2H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) inclination. Golder Associates, Inc. also reviewed the grading plan submittal, and commented on several specific aspects of the grading plan in their November 17, 1997 report. On page 5 of the referenced Golder report, Golder states that the permanent slope configurations shown on the grading plan will have a factor of safety on the order of 1.5, assuming the recommendations in the Golder report and the Jaeger Engineering grading letter are followed. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. City of Federal Way Project No. 6G-9707028 January 21, 1998 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS The following summary describes our understanding of the critical geotechnical design and construction issues and corresponding conclusions. If other conditions exist of which we are unaware, we should be consulted for possible modification of our conclusions and recommendations. Golder Associates has characterized the sideslope of the 25t' Place South embankment on lots 53 and 54 as wet, loose silty sand with little to some gravel, and Golder Associates concludes that the fill embankment does not apppear to be well compacted. It is our opinion that the slope failures and conditions noted by Golder Associates all indicate that there is a substantial risk that the portions of the embankment proposed for house construction on other lots in addition to lot 53 and 54, are comprised of loosely compacted fill. • Temporary stabilization of the embankment fill only involved benching and placement of quarry spall fill on lots 53 and 54, and constructing a fiench drain at the toe of slope. Plastic sheeting was used to cover lots 52 through 54. We are concerned with the wet condition of the embankment fill considering that drains were installed two weeks before our October 15, 1997 evaluation of embankment fill. Golder Associates recommends that the drain be augmented at lot 55. • A slope stability analysis was completed by Golder Associates on lot 54, which Golder considered the critical section of embankment fill. The slope stability analysis was only completed for temporary slope repair for winter of 1997-1998. The calculated safety factor is 1.1. Although Golder Associates concludes that the planned permanent slope configurations will have a factor of safety of 1.5, calculations and supporting information Sxere not in ded in the Golder Associates' November 1997 report. • Golder recommends that portions of house foundations on lots 53, 54, and 55 underlain by loose fill be supported by auger cast, or small diameter steel pipe piles. In addition, they state that remaining foundations will only have a small thickness of existing fill at depth, and will be supported on structural fill to be placed later, or on native soils. In our opinion, where foundations are not supported by piles or native soils, significant risk would exist for foundation settlement if information is not provided which produces greater confidence in the supporting characteristics of the existing fill, it should be assumed that any improvements constructed over it would be subject to long-term settlements unless supported on piles or deep foundations. GILES ENGINEERING l ISSOCIATES, INC. City of Federal Way Project No. 6G-9707028 January 21, 1998 Page 4 • The site grading alternatives presented in the Golder November 17, 1997 report indicate that permission from the city was given to till east of the property line at lots 52 through 56. Lots 57 and 58 will have rockery walls at the property line, and reinforced fill, at the base of fill slopes. In general, extension of the fill limit east of the property line will improve stability of the completed fill, by increasing the buttress of the existing, questionable fill. Golder Associates has not provided specific design recommendations or stability analysis of the reinforced fill and rockery sections of the sloping fills. IiECO1VdMEND AnONS Our recommendations are based on the available information; if additional information is provided, these recommendations may require modification. We recommend the following. 1. Lot grading in the affected area should be designed to both provide a factor of safety equal to 1.5 or more for stability of the completed fill, and to provide adequate bearing capacity and settlement per-oll-n.ance of the completed houses. A dditioiially, lot grading should incorporate drainage improvements to collect and divert subsurface water and mitigate effects of this water on both the roadway and iot fills. Supplemental documentation should include the description of and results of stability w-talysis for the final grading of lots 52 through 58. 2. Groundwater conditions should be established by monitoring the performance of the interceptor drain presently in place, or by other means. The stability analysis should be based on groundwater conditions established by these means. The drainage should be supplemented, if necessary. I The design for [(.t grading should incl:?de all erosion con-trol mea.suns, n. aradin = criteria, typically required for wet weather construction. These criteria may be dependent on the moisture sensitivity of the fill source. 4. Specific design and stability of planned reinforced fill and rockery construction on lots 57 and 58 should be completed. 5. Design for any foundations supported over existing fill (as shown on Figure 1 of the November 17, 1997 Golder Associates report), should consist of deep foundations, footings extended through the fill to suitable native soi,, or footings suApnrtcd on compacted structural fill placed or suitable native soils foilowing reliloval of existing fill, based on the avallan'e information. All of the available Lli:oinlation indicates that the existing emban-imient sideslope tall presents a risk of settlement of structures built above it. GILES ENGINEERING l 1SSOCIATES, INC. City of Federal Way Project No. 6G-9707028 January 21, 1998 Page 5 We appreciate this opportunity to provide these services. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. We are available to review additional submitals received on these matters, or to meet with City staff to discuss these matters at your request. Respectfully submitted, GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Chris J. ehrens Engineering Geologist John E. Zipper Regional Man, cc: Mr. Jima Harris Senior Planner City of Federal Way 1.12)(PIRES, 1 / 24 RECEIVED BY' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAwMEW Shirley Blackburn 28002 22 Ave S Federal Way Wash 98003 To the city of T-ederal Way we received your notice of land use application for Feritage Woods to modify and allow the filling and grading. What I want of know is why we did not receive a note like this before they hauled in yards of dirt the made the land behind us directly 10 feet highrr then it was before. Its not, good for building a house to haul in 10 feet of dirt and expect it not, to have bad settling and cracking efects on those home as that new dirt of 10 feet starts to settle.There has already been tremendous water flooding problems there since the developement started. I feel tha the ground back there is full of undergour springs and is a natural water aquifer it should have been made forwells and water supply or a city pa.rk.It was a place for all the animals including hawks. Iwould like to apeal this application for Heritage Woods to fill any more holes in the ground. "'hat place is a envioremental joke it should never been developed ,'or houseing . This area is being over developed and there is a water shortage I am against more filling and grading at Heritage Woods. Sincerely, Shirley Blackburn PS Our home was flooded out once by this developement already (5Lt Se T() I-ect,-4e- � �r-ecu-, 6 e-4W e ern cis -tr1jI 4AC � ou& C ci:-/l 4keV nd1 I�c 400k Ct6(,J,l ill tie V•C. C} z S C h C (-J c � i U 0 ►'l W e ✓1 d h Gl � � in D P- s C CITY OfAC�- 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH February 3, 1998 Mr. Dennis Alfredson Schneider Homes 6510 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 2 Tukwila, WA 98188 (253) 661-4000 FEDE WA . WA 98003-6210 Re: Residential Height Variance for Heritage Woods Tracts H and J Dear Mr. Alfredson: This letter summarizes our conversation on January 26, 1998, regarding submittal requirements for a residential height variance for Tracts H and J of Heritage Woods. One variance will be processed for both Tracts H and J (seven future lots). The height variance is necessary in part because of the depth of the fill proposed by Parklane under a pending State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Site Plan Review application. The Federal Way City Code (FWCC) definition of average building elevation includes a reference datum point which is no higher than five feet above the lowest elevation taken at any exterior wall of the structure either prior to any development activity or at finished grade, whichever is lower, provided the reference datum is equal to or lower than the highest elevation at any exterior wall of the structure prior to development activity. This definition requires using the existing grade as the reference point for measuring height. In summary, you are requesting, and the city will support, a variance to allow residential structures up to 30 feet above average building elevation using the finished lot grade proposed by Parklane. In order to determine the amount of variance, your application request needs to show the maximum variance in terms of height for each lot. Each height variance can be determined by calculating the building height from the proposed finished grade and adding the depth of the approved fill under the average building elevation point. Some of the proposed lots may not require a variance due to an insignificant fill depth. Mr. Dennis Alfredson February 3, 1998 Page 2 Submittal requirements for the application are outlined below. A complete and detailed submittal packet will expedite the variance processing. The submitted drawings and narratives must be presented in a manner that can be provided to and understood by the Hearing Examiner. SUBNIlTTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Master Land Use Application 2. Process IV residential variance filing fee of $500.00. 3. Eight sets of planimetric view maps showing the proposed lot boundaries, curb, sidewalk, building envelope, north arrow, adjacent street, lot number, etc. 4. Eight sets of cross section drawings to true scale (equal horizontal and vertical scale) must be provided for each lot. The cross sections must display the existing grade, proposed finished grade, average building elevation measurement, approximate proposed structure height, street and sidewalk grade, and applicable amount of height variance for each parcel. The cross sections may be developed by modifying the Jaeger Engineering plan currently on file for the proposed grading permit. 5. Detailed written description of the requested variance. 6. Written justification of how the requested variance meets the decisional criteria in FWCC Section 22-198 (1-4). 7. One copy of the current King County Assessors quarter section map for the area. 8. Stamped envelopes (with City of Federal Way return address), of each person receiving tax statements of all property within 300 feet of the subject site (entire Heritage Woods site), and a list of the same. A bulletin on ObtainingMailing Labels is enclosed. 9. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1653(2), a written request to exempt your project from a pre - application conference. Mr. Dennis Alfredson February 3, 1998 Page 3 I have enclosed a Checklist for Development Application which provides additional submittal requirements information. I hope this information is helpful in preparing your application. Please be aware that planning staff has indicated support of the variance as discussed above, however the Hearing Examiner has authority for review and decision on the variance application. Contact me at (253)661-4019 if you have any questions. Sincerely, m Harris Senior Planner enc: Variance Handout Process IV Handout Mailing Labels Handout Master Land Use Application Checklist for Development Submittal Requirements FWCC Scctiong, & 22- [b s3 Average Building Elevation Definition Height of Structure Definition c: David Morrison, Parklane k\PRMSYS'\DOCLJ aErmser97 OO.OIXCDO2o396AOC DRUID W . MORRISON TEL:1-206-720-4045 Feb 02,95 9:50 No.001 P.01 I10. - ; ?, 1 PARKLANE VENTURES 31620 2300 AVENUE, SUITE 320 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 (253) 946-3652 February 2, 1998 VIA FAX (253) 661.4129 Mr. Jim Harris, Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 First Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6210 Re: Heritage Woods - Grading Permit - M.D.N.s. Dear Jim: l am in receipt of your letter of January 28 and the Giles review memorandum dated January 21, 1998, and the two letters from neighboring homeowners responding to our Grading Permit application. As you are aware, Tracts H & J are at the north side of Heritage Woods and back ❑nto N.G.P.E. and storm detention Tracts, and do not back onto adjacent single family lots and homes. The Biackbum property backs onto lots 25 and 27 of Div. 1, at the west side of the prquct, where Schneider is building now, and the grading of Tracts H & J will not affect the drainage or the green belt between the Blackburn property and lots 25 and 27. The Kody property is north of the N.G.P,E. and storm detention tract, and again will not be impacted by the grading and drainage of Tracts H & J. Please advise me of the supplemental information and final decision issues You require prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. If additional information is required we need to prepare this information now, so I that the Permit may be issued as soon as we receive the M.D.N.S. We look forward to receiving the M.D,N.S. this week. Sincerely, 4V;?t DWM:st David W. Morrison CC: Jim Johnson, Golder & Assoc. Jim Jaeger, Jaeger Engineering Dennis Aifredson, Schneider Homes Gino Nonni, Parklane .:q;� �,rv,+{•'a4rtv�;.iwa+isk�n.M..eir+::v.,�+r:.���6'K��gO'�11�1+4�..irnwl.,:a,ej�h s.+;a,,.,- .. � .., ... ..., . .. 02/02/98 MON 08:56 [TX/RX NO 75121 CITY OF E[] 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH January 28, 1998 (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 VIAFAX (253) 946-3580 Mr. David Morrison Parklane Ventures Inc. 31620 - 23rd Avenue South, Suite 320 Federal Way, WA 98003 FILiS Re: Heritage Woods — Giles Engineering Review, Modification to Preliminary Plat Conditions 6 and 7, Tracts H and J; File Nos SEP97-0001 & UPR97--0003 Dear Mr. Morrison: On January 27, 1998, I provided you with a copy of the Giles Engineering review memorandum dated January 21, 1998, and received by the city on January 23, 1998. The Giles review and subsequent conversations with John Zipper of Giles Engineering do not indicate any major design flaws with the preliminary design of the project. Therefore, I am proceeding with issuance of a SEPA mitigated determination of nonsignificance (NIDNS) for the project. Supplemental information and final design issues will need to be submitted and resolved prior to issuance of a grading permit, however, I am currently working on the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) decision. I anticipate issuing the SEPA decision the first or second week of February. I have also attached copies of two letters I received as a result of the January 6, 1998, notice of land use application mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. You do not need to respond to the letters, however these citizens will have rights to appeal the forthcoming SEPA decision. I will be contacting these citizens and attempt to resolve their issues and concerns. I will keep you abreast of any concerns they may raise. If you have any questions, please contact me at (253) 661-4019. Sincerely, fry im Harris Senior Planner enc c: Greg Fewins, Principal Plarincr Stephen Clifton, Public Works. Development Services Manager John Zipper, Giles Engineering L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENT%SEP97-00.01\CDo1279E.DOC 01i23i98 14:44 GILES ENGINEERING � 2536614129 NO.504 P002i006 • Atlanta, GA • Dallas, TX • Los Angeles. CA • Madison, WI • Milwaukee. WI • Seattle, WA • Weehingron. D.C. GILES ENGINEERING DISSOCIATES, INC. GEOTZCHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONSULTANTS City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003-6210 January 21, 1998 Attention: Stephen Clifton, Development Services Manager Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Review of Slope Grading Proposal Heritage Woods, Tract H and J of Division 1, Lots 52 through 58 Federal Way, Washington Project No. 60-9707028 Dear Mr. Clifton: RECEIVED BY DEVELOPMENT E RTMEI JA N 2 3 1938 This letter presents the opinions and conclusions of Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. regarding geotechnical engineering considerations for development of the referenced residential lots, as noted on plan sheets 1 and 2 of "Heritage Woods, Tract H and J, Lot Grading Plan", by Jaeger Engineering, revision date 12/9/97. These conclusions were reached based upon information developed by: • Review of inspection reports from temporary stabilization in Fall 1997 provided by Golder Associates, Inc.; ■ Review of information in Golder Associates, Inc, geotechnical engineering report dated November 17, 1997, titled "Analysis and Results of Slope Stabilization Work, Tract H and J of Division 1, Preliminary Lots 52 through 58, Heritage Woods, Federal Way, Washington'; • Observation of soil conditions on site during excavation of test pits by the project contractor on October 15, 1997; • Engineering analysis. Authorization for these services was provided in your letter of January 8, 1998, which authorized our scope of services dated December 22, 1997, as an amendment to our Professional Services Agreement for Geotechnical Engineering Review Services, dated August 6, 1997. The purpose of these services was limited to an evaluation of earthwork and foundation construction proposed by the project developer .for the referenced site, based upon the information provided to us. This letter is an instrument of service, and the conclusions presented herein have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice .in the field of geotechnical engineering. No other warranty is either expressed or implied. This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Federal Way, for specific application to the stated purpose and site. 11807 North Creek Parkway South • Suite 102 • Bothell. WA 98011 425/482-2020 - Fax 4251482-6300 • E-Mail seattle0gilesengrxonn 01/23/98 FRI 14:46 [TX/RX NO 74071 01/23i9E 14:44 GILES ENGINEERING 4 2536614129 NO.504 P003/006 GILES ENGINEERING DISSOCIATES, INC. City of Federal Way Project No. 6G-9707028 January 21, 1998 Page 2 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Our letter dated August 25, 1997 provides a description of the project site and conditions. Subsequent to that letter, the developer completed temporary stabilization of portions of the project site during October 1997. The Golder Associates report dated November 17, 1997 describes the temporary stabilization. The site conditions were evaluated by Golder Associates, Inc. following the slope failures, for the purpose of providing options for lot grading and construction. Golder Associates provided three geotechnical reports which were supplied to us by the City for review. These reports were dated June 23, July 14, and November 17, 1997. The June 23, 1997 report includes information regarding soil and groundwater conditions, including the logs of six test pits excavated on June 15, 1997. The July 14 report contains a summary of grading alternatives for lots 52 through 59, which were based on configurations of the lots such as setbacks, slopes, and grades provided by Schneider Iomes. The November 17 report includes description of temporary slope repair work, additional investigation results on Lots 53 and 54, slope stability analysis on lot 54 using recent exploration data, and recommendations for additional lot grading. The Jaeger Engineer grading plan reviewed for this study reflects the geotechnical recommendations of Golder Associates' November 17, 1997 report. Site conditions were observed by a geologist from our firm on October 15, 1997. The purpose of this reconnaissance was to evaluate soil conditions in test pits excavated in fill within the embankment side slope on lots 53 and 54. The test pits encountered a significant quantity and depth of very loose, wet to saturated fill within the embankment side slope. The fill consisted of silty sand with gravel. The fill beneath the roadway prism was found to be relatively dense, based on information in the Golder Associates' report and our observations. As a part of this review, we reviewed plan sheets 1 and 2 by Jaeger Engineering, dated October 8, 1997, with revision dated. December 9, 1997 for sheet 1. The plan sheets contain general notes, a detail for interceptor trench drain construction, fill specifications, and cross -sections through lots 52 through 58 indicating existing grades and proposed final lot grades. In general, the proposed lot grades will result in fill depths of up to 20 feet on portions of the lots. The toe of fill extends up to 45 feet east of the existing property Iine. The toe of fill is proposed to be retained by a reinforced fill and rockery at lots 57 and 58. Fill slopes are designed for a 214:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) inclination. Golder Associates, Inc. also reviewed the grading plan submittal, and commented on several specific aspects of the grading plan in their November 17, 1997 report. On page 5 of the referenced Golder report, Golder states that the permanent slope configurations shown on the grading plan will have a factor of safety on the order of L5, assuming the recommendations in the Golder report and the Jaeger Engineering grading letter are followed. 01/23/98 FRI 14:46 [TX/RX NO 74071 01/23/98 14:45 GILES ENGINEERING 4 2536614129 N0.504 P004/006 City of Federal Way Project No. 6G-9707028 January 21, 1998 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS GILES ENGINEERING DISSOCIATES, INC. The following summary describes our understanding of the critical geotechnical design and construction issues and corresponding conclusions. If other conditions exist of which we are unaware, we should be consulted for possible modification of our conclusions and recommendations. Golder Associates has characterized the sideslope of the 251h Place South embankment on lots 53 and 54 as wet, loose silty sand with little to some gravel, and Golder Associates concludes that the fill embankment does not apppear to be well compacted. It is our opinion that the slope failures and conditions noted by Golder Associates all indicate that there is a substantial risk that the portions of the embankment proposed for house construction on other lots in addition to lot 53 and 54, are comprised of loosely compacted fill. Temporary stabilization of the embankment fill only involved benching and placement of quarry spall fill on lots 53 and 54, and constructing a french drain at the toe of slope. Plastic sheeting was used to cover lots 52 through 54. We are concerned with the wet condition of the embankment fill considering that drains were installed two weeks before our October 15, 1997 evaluation of embankment fill. Golder Associates recommends that the drain be augmented at lot 55. A slope stability analysis was completed by Golder Associates on lot 54, which Golder considered the critical section of embankment fill. The slope stability analysis was only completed for temporary slope repair for winter of 1997-1998. The calculated safety factor is I.I. Although Golder Associates concludes that the planned permanent slope configurations will have a factor of safety of 1.5, calculations and supporting information were not included in the Golder Associates' November 1997 report. Golder recommends that portions of house foundations on lots 53, 54, and 55 underlain by loose fill be supported by auger cast, or small diameter steel pipe piles. In addition, they state that remaining foundations will only have a small thickness of existing fill at depth, and will be supported on structural fill to be placed later, or on native soils. In our opinion, where foundations are not supported by piles or native soils, significant risk would exist for foundation settlement if information is not provided which produces greater confidence in the supporting characteristics of the existing fill, it should be assumed that any improvements constructed over it would be subject to long -teen settlements unless supported on piles or deep foundations. 01/23/98 FRI 14:46 [TX/RX NO 74071 01/23/98 14:46 GILES ENGINEERING 4 2536614129 N0.504 P005/006 i GILES ENGINEERING f)SSOCIATES, INC. City of Federal Way Project No. 6G-9707028 January 21, 1998 Page 4 The site grading alternatives presented in the Golder November 17, 1997 report indicate that permission from the city was given to fi11 east of the property line at lots 52 through 56. Lots 57 and 58 will have rockery walls at the property line, and reinforced fill, at the base of fill slopes. In general, extension of the fill limit east of the property line will improve stability of the completed fill, by increasing the buttress of the existing, questionable fill. Golder Associates has not provided specific design recommendations or stability analysis of the reinforced fill and rockery sections of the sloping fills. RECOMMENDATIONS Our recommendations are based on the available information; if additional information is provided, these recommendations may require modification. We recommend the following. Lot grading in the affected area should be designed to both provide a factor of safety equal to 1.5 or more for stability of the completed fill, and to provide adequate bearing capacity and settlement performance of the completed houses. Additionally, lot grading should incorporate drainage improvements to collect and divert subsurface water and mitigate effects of this water on both the roadway and lot fills. Supplemental documentation should include the description of and results of stability analysis for the final grading of lots 52 through 58. 2. Groundwater conditions should be established by monitoring the performance of the interceptor drain presently in place, or by other means. The stability analysis should be based on groundwater conditions established by these means. The drainage should be supplemented, if necessary. 3. The design for lot grading should include all erosion control .measures, and grading criteria, typically required for wet weather construction. These criteria may be dependent on the moisture sensitivity of the fill source. 4. Specific design and stability of planned reinforced fill and rockery construction on lots 57 and 58 should be completed. 5. Design for any foundations supported over existing fill (as shown on Figure 1 of the November 17, 1997 Golder Associates report), should consist of deep foundations, footings extended through the fill to suitable native soil, or footings supported on compacted structural fill placed on suitable native soil following removal of existing fill, based on the available information. All of the available information indicates that the existing embankment sideslope fill presents a .risk of settlement of structures built above it. 01/23/98 FRI 14:46 [TX/RX NO 74071 012319E 14:46 GILES ENGINEERING 4 2536614129 NO.504 P006/006 GILES ENGINEERING i )SSOCIATES, INC. City of Federal Way Project No. 6G-9707028 January 21, 1998 Page 5 We appreciate this opportunity to provide these services. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. We are available to review additional submitals received on these matters, or to meet with City staff to discuss these matters at your request. cc: Mr. Jim Farris Senior Planner City of Federal Way Respectfully submitted, GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. :7 Chris J. Be ens Engineering Geologist XOT John E. Zipper, P.E. Regional Manager 01/23/98 FRI 14:46 [TX/RX NO 74071 CITY OF (253) 661-4000 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I < l:� , hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, tw-. ❑ Notice of Application ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Notice of Determination of Non - Significance and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Environmental Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Proposed Land Use Action ❑ Notice of Public Land Use Hearing ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner Mice of Land Use Application ❑ Other w mailed/f dlposted to/at each of following addresses (see attached) on 1998. Project Name i File Number(s) - a(ttPRe7 a_3 Signature Date AmDAvt.FRm REVISED 1%2198 ,—) CITY OF 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION The City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services has received an application to modify Heritage Woods preliminary plat conditions #6 and #7 to allow the filling and grading of approximately 25,000 cubic yards of material within Tracts H and J of Heritage Woods Division I, at approximately the 28000 block of 25th Place South in Federal Way, WA. Federal Way file numbers for the project are SEP97-0001 and UPR97-0003. The following documents were submitted in conjunction with the application: Geotechnical Engineering Report by Golder Associates, Vegetation Survey, and SEPA Checklist. The application will be reviewed for compliance with the Zoning Chapter (18) of the Federal Way City Code and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The application was deemed complete on December 10, 1997. Any person or public agency expressing an interest in this application is invited to submit written comments to Gregory D. Moore AICP, Community Development Services Director, by January 19, 1998. Only those persons that submit written comments to the Director of Community Development Services, or those who specifically request a copy of the final decision, may appeal the director's decision. The official file is available for review at the Department of Community Development Services, 33530 1st Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Written comments may be submitted to this address. For further information on the above project, contact Jim Harris Senior Planner, at (253) 661-4019. LAPRMSYS\DOCUMENIISEP97 00.01\CMPLNOT.DOC Heritage Woods Tracts H and J - Filling and Grading N January 1998 Federal Way CityMap SCALE 1:5995 NTs fderal taion only. io Way makes no warrant s as !o ids c uracy. JCITYOF 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH January 8, 1998 John Zipper P.E. Giles Engineering Associates 19019 36th Avenue West, Suite G Lynnwood, WA 98036 (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 VIA FAX (425)771-5557 RE: Heritage Woods Tracts H and J Slope Grading (SEP97-0001) As a follow-up to my voice message this morning, please proceed with your review of the Heritage Woods Slope grading proposal as outlined in your December 22, 1997 Scope of Services (attached). The December 22, 1997 scope includes a cost estimate not to exceed $1,800.00. Any expenditure exceeding this amount requires approval by the City. A copy of the revised Jaeger Engineering plans sheets 1 and 2 were forwarded to your office on December 26, 1997 and should replace the plan sheets from the initial submittal. Please provide your written review by January 22, 1998. Contact me at (253)661-4019 if you have any questions. Sincerely, .nnM Jim Harris Senior Planner C: Stephen Clifton, Development Services Manager Greg Fewins, Principal Planner David Morrison, Parldane VIA Fax (253)946-3580 L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENT\SEP97-00.01\CDO10897.DOC AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: 'Y, Notice of Application ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Notice of Determination of Non - Significance and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Environmental Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Proposed Land Use Action ❑ Notice of Public Land Use Hearing ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Land Use Application ❑ Other was mailedlfaxedlposted to/at each of following addresses (see attached) on 1998. Project Name + I-L I H IIit_r)I + File Number(s) ti - ) Signature ` I�f.ir!i;�'! �1 _ Date t A FF0AV LFRM REVISED 1/8/98 Fed. W Li.bat L ,1,6irzq �b mr,,Aq mi & W C' it I+aa Crf Y OF AV 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH (206) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, th�i - ❑ Notice of Application ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance ❑ Notice of Determination of Non - Significance and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Environmental Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance (SEPA) ❑ Notice of Proposed Land Use Action ❑ Notice of Public Land Use Hearing ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner o�Notice of Land Use Application ❑ Other was mai ed/faxe osted to/at each of following addresses (see attached) 2 J. 1997. Project Name File Number(s) Signature AFFIDAv► Rm REVISED 3/20/97 Date /--,) - '? 1-5-2 12/29/97 RON 13:45 FAX 2536614129 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CM001 x�sx� TX REPORT s*e TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID ST. TIME USAGE T PGS. RESULT 0504 92062412776 12/29 13:44 01'25 2 OK CITY OF 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH Mayor Mahlon "Skip" Priest CYV Manager Kenneth E. Nyberg (25--3) 9M) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM TO: DATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (Including Memo Sheet)_ FROM: OFFICE OF: RE: Council Members Jack Dovey Hope Elder Mary Gatea Ron Gintz Michael Park Phil Watkins FAX #: -s7/, - ;2 Ll / 27 7/— r A,. o CITY OF (253) 661-4000 Pry 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION The City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services has received an application to modify Heritage Woods preliminary plat conditions #6 and #7 to allow the filling and grading of approximately 25,000 cubic yards of material within Tracts H and J of Heritage Woods Division I, at approximately the 28000 block of 25th Place South in Federal Way, WA. Federal Way file numbers for the project are SEP97-0001 and UPR97-0003. The following documents were submitted in conjunction with the application: Geotechnical Engineering Report by Golder Associates, Vegetation Survey, and SEPA Checklist. The application will be reviewed for compliance with the Zoning Chapter (18) of the Federal Way City Code and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The application was deemed complete on December 10, 1997. Any person or public agency expressing an interest in this application is invited to submit written comments to Gregory D. Moore AICP, Community Development Services Director, by January 17, 1998. Only those persons that submit written comments to the Director of Community Development Services, or those who specifically request a copy of the final decision, may appeal the director's decision. The official file is available for review at the Department of Community Development Services, 33530 1st Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Written comments may be submitted to this address. For further information on the above project, contact Jim Harris Senior Planner, at (253) 661-4019. Date of Publication: January 3, 1998. L:\PRMSYS\DOCLTWNIISEP97 00.01\CMPLNOT.DOC DEC-29-97 i10N 15:10 P. 01 12/29/97 Mr. Jim Harris City Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1 st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Heritage Woods - Tracts H & JlGiles & Associates Dear Jim; PARKLANE FarkLane Executive Center 31620-23rd Avenue South #320 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Telephone: (206) 946-3652 Fax; (206) 946-3580 I am in receipt of your faxed memo with the revised Giles Engineering Assoc. proposal. This will serve,to authorize completion of this proposal for an amount not to exceed $1,800.00 and to be completed on or before Jan. 9/97. We submitted the report Nov. 18 and Giles has had the report since November. To prepare their proposal from Dec. 16 to Jan. 9, gives them 9 working days to complete 10 hours of work. Please have $1,800.00 transferred from the Cash Deposit Refunds Stephen Clifton is administering, to guarantee payment of an invoice from Giles upon completion of this proposal. Please commission Giles to complete the report on or before Jan. 9/97. cc: Stephen Clifton Jim Jaeger Jim Johnson David Erickson Gino Nonni Thank you, Av��- David W. Morrison We. are committed to gtfalily, value and service 12/29/97 MON 14:10 [T%/RX N0 70801 DEC-29-97 MON 15:11 P.02 121Z3197 IMS u6:31 V" ib3F31i- 118 UITY OF F1WERAL WAY 16001 C1Ty oR 335M 167 WAY SCUM Mayor Mahlon "91dp" Priest Cirx Mangy Ktauarh B. Nyberg (206) 661-40M FEDERAL WAY. WA 9MM-6210 FAX TR.ANSN=AL MEMORANDUM -NUpR! OF PAGES (Including Memo Sheer) FROM: !►r� ! Cor<aefl Members 7wkDavey Baps Bider ugly Gem" Ron Gimz lv i0h?Al Pak Phil Wamuss FAX #. mil 1,J CA leckn A i ++t flr ❑ r Ij -cu I.JG{� "lU_ CCt[`Sigr 1�xcM� Ult( A SC) PU4 zr CL Wft� If mere am any problems during this ltaarmltdQn. plums GIB 661-4000 and mk far 12/29/97 MON 14:10 [TX/RX NO 70801 DEC-29-97 MON 15:11 12/23/97 TUB 08;32 ia/22rw 13a90 AINW& oA • or1.^ TX • U* AA•W ■. cA ., VA • PAMBU®d 11d1 ■ 000h. WA • wl4"10h, D.C. P. 03 FAX 253se,�20 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 19002 GI! E*a Eh. AEERma -6 2WSS 4139 PQ. VW PUQ2-'14W GILES CjdG MRiN© l�1SWOATES� 1Nr, 1]-8Y ... " �A1-W OEPARil 50 0M6hHwcxL, F.�ililuda.sp. & �srntirosloN DE(; 2 2 1997 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SHRVUES GEOTECIDUCAL ENGngEERjNQ REVMW 'VYCP3: CONTRACT AMPMUM yT GILES ENGFNEE UNG ASSOMATFS, INC. PR ECT NO.60-970729 Denihaar n, 1997 The pwpose of the geotecWrsl sa6maing review servioes contract amendment is to provide wmultatkm and review of ddveloper design and conshuedon. The services will include re0ew ofinspeadon reporm Avtm tairipmaty stabilization in IWI 1997 provided by the developer's cusiueer, obseivationoftest pits in mnba ikment 8l1 is 0claber 1997. review ofplaas dated October 6, 1997 and Golder lepmt data4 November 17,1997, annul oc in raeedgp 1fraquested by the City, and review of conceptual detest nb=iimis. A written repowt will be provided to the City, st> ring our co=luaiow and ns. The dates of completion of the mulew an exuaded tbrovah completion of review of the November 17, 1997 Golder Assacizes scpox% tcatadv* anticipatcd to be February 1, 1998. A supplemental scope of services and umtraet amaadment will be required to review document ami plan revisions beyond those identified in this December 22, 1997 scope ofservices. Tasks to be ronwictcd for this amendment an: Betittastad Hours Zts s CAU I. Oet.1997 Tca Pit Observation 0 6 S450 2. Docutt<iCiltRC%4e w 4 0 3440 3. A>natlyais 2 0 5220 4. Rovort and Rezotnr EWations 4 0 $440 S. Meeting 2 II Totals: 12 6 S1770 Reimbursable- eupemees (vllowance) 5 30 Retimaud wdti tioval Se"1404 Total: S1800 Swuiees are to be completed in acoordaoce with the Professional Services Agreement whit the City of Fedessl WW dated August 1,1997_ Billing will bo an a time and materials bmi's in accardaoee with the rates in this axhibir. in the event that additional services are required. they will be bilkal at the car>icnt ratca of Giles Ee811120t3ng nssoclams. Inc_ 'rite to131 Poe of $3900.00 will not be exceeded wPthout prior authorl2ation and amantlmalnt of die Agreement. �1ea� 1r� cs� �e»<way s� • skim too • ttlorrlar, wa 1�t1at+ 1L/22/97 tYW 12:42 [TY/RX NO 70301 12/29/97 MON 14:10 [TX/RX NO 70801 CITYJF& f9r)POor 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH TO: Stephen Clifton, File FROM: Jim Harris, Senior Plann DATE: December 26, 1997 RE: Heritage Woods Tracts H and J Grading (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 This memo summarizes our conversation this morning regarding the Giles review of Heritage Woods geotechnical report for Heritage Woods Tracts H and J. David Morrison from Parklane has authorized review cost not to exceed $1,800.00 per the December 22, 1997 Giles Engineering Scope of Services. The $1,800.00 is to come from the existing Parklane cash deposits which accompany the existing Parklane bonds. You will be releasing Parklane's bonds and cash deposits when Schneider Homes provides replacement bonds and cash deposits. When you receive the Schneider Homes bonds and deposit, and release Parklane's bonds and cash deposits, transfer $1,800.00 of the Parklane cash deposit to account # 001-0000-000- 239-10-004 (Deposit -ESA Review pass-thru). Since I will be out of the office the week of December 29, then authorize Giles Engineering to conduct their review per the December 22, 1997 Scope of Services. As of December 26, 1997, Schneider Homes has not submitted the bonds and cash deposits to the City, which will allow release of the Parklane bonds and cash. You anticipate receipt of the Schneider Homes bonds during the week of December 29. You will be in the office only Tuesday, December 30th during the week of December 29, so Schneider Homes needs to facilitate this transaction by providing the bonds and cash by December 29. C: Greg Fewins David Morrison, Via Fax (253)946-3580 12i22i97 13:50 GILES ENGINEERING � 2536614129 NO.990 P002i002 • Atlanta, GA • Oallea. TX • LOS Angeles, CA • Mediaon, WI • Milwaukee. WI • SBanle, WA • Washington, D.C. GILES ENGINEERING DISSOCIATES, INC: FEE \/Y GEOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSTRUCTION M "Tebla&jifd T OEPARTMENT D E C 2 2 1997 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REVIEW SERVICES: CONTRACT AMENDMENT GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT NO. 6G-970728 December 22, 1997 The purpose of the geotechnical engineering review services contract amendment is to provide consultation and review of developer design and constriction. The services will include review of inspection reports from temporary stabilization in fall 1997 provided by the developer's engineer, observation of test pits in embankment fill in October 1997, review of plans dated October 6, 1997 and Golder report dated November 17, 1997, attendance at meetings if requested by the City, and review of conceptual design submittals. A written report will be provided to the City, summarizing our conclusions and recommendations. The dates of completion of the services are extended through completion of review of the November 17, 1997 Golder Associates report, tentatively anticipated to be February 1, 1998. A supplemental scope of services and contract amendment will be required to review document and plan revisions beyond those identified in this December 22, 1997 scope of services. Tasks to be completed for this amendment are: Estimated Hours lask Senigr Fngineer ($I IQlhr.l Field Geologist (7 /hr.l - 1 1. Oct. 1997 Test Pit Observation 0 6 $450 2. Document Review 4 0 $440 3. Analysis 2 0 $220 4. Report and Recommendations 4 0 $440 5. Meeting 2 .0 sm Totals: 12 6 $1770 Reimbursable expenses (allowance) $ 30 Estimated Additional Services Total: $1800 Services are to be completed in accordance with the Professional Services Agreement with the City of Federal Way dated August 1, 1997. Billing will be on a time and materials basis in accordance with the rates in this exhibit. In the event that additional services are required, they will be billed at the current rates of Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. The total fee of $3900.00 will not be exceeded without prior authorization and amendment of the Agreement. 11807 North Creek Parkway South • Suite 102 • Bothell, WA 98011 4251482-2020 • Fax 425/482-8300 • E-Mall seattle®gllasengr.com 12/22/97 MON 12:42 [T%/R% NO 70301 DEC-19-97 FRI 13:04 P. 01 12/19/97 Mr. Jim Harris Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 list Way So. Federal Way, WA 98003 RECEI'1 F COMMUNITY DEVF-(;r�l['C r -"T DEC 19 1997 Re: Heritage Woods, Div. 1. Tracts H & J Grading Permit Giles & Assoc, Estimate of Cost Dear Jim; PA.RKLANE ParkLane Executive Center 31620-23rd Avenue South,4320 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Telephone: (206) 946-3652 Fax: (206) 946-3580 In response to your call this morning, we agree to pay Giles Engineering Assoc. their cost to review the Golder and Assoc. Nov. 17/97 report and related field notes. We also agree to pay Giles for the time their field inspector spent on site with Golder and Assoc. inspecting and testing the test holes, during the repairs. We will not pay for any more site visits or meetings until we are in receipt of a copy of Gile's review and recommendations of the Nov. 19197 Golder & Assoc. report. Please have Giles revise their cost estimate accordingly. Sincerely, zwmolp� David W. Morrison cc: Jim Johnson, Golder & Assoc. Jim Jaeger, Jaeger Engineering David Erickson, Parklane Ventures, Inc. We Are comyrzitted to quality, value and service +,• 6,141) nvr rwirnnarc AftL 12/19/97 FRI 12:04 [TX/RX NO 70151 CITY OF 0. 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH December 17, 1997 Mr: David Morrison Parklane Ventures Inc. 31620 - 23rd Avenue South, Suite 320 Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 VIAFAX (253) 946-3580 Re: Heritage Woods—Modfication to Preliminary Plat Conditions 6 and 7, Tracts H and J File Nos. SEP97-000I & UPR97-0003 Dear Mr. Morrison: I have received the revised sheet 1 of 2 for the Heritage Woods Tracts H and J Lot Grading Plan by Jim Jaeger. A copy of the plan has been forwarded to Giles Engineering. The only revision made by Jim Jaeger to this plan sheet is the relocation of the fill limits and silt fence outside the required 100 foot wetland setback area behind lot 58 and 59. Several issues, highlighted below, regarding this application to grade and fill approximately 25,000 cubic yards to the steep slope areas within Tracts H and J still need to be resolved. On December 12, 1997, I provided you a cost estimate Scope of Services from Giles Engineering to review the Golder Associates November 17, 1997, report and accompanying documents. Your approval and financial deposit for the amount of the scope of services is required prior to initiation of the review. 2. The Jaeger Engineering plan and Golder report are conceptual in nature and are not final engineering plans and documents. Once conceptual approval is agreed upon by Giles Engineering, the SEPA review can be issued. Following SEPA issuance, I would expect to see additional detailed engineering information, including utility relocation and other information, as may be requested in Giles forthcoming review. In addition to the design Factor of Safety 1.5, the city will also require your geotechnical engineer to substantiate, either through design or adherence to special conditions, that the future development (homes) will have less than a 25 percent chance of failing by collapsing or becoming dangerous and/or uninhabitable due to slope movement within a 50 year period. Mr. David Morrison December 17, 1997 Page 2 3. The landscape plan submitted on November 19, 1997, is insufficient. My previous correspondence requested the landscape plan to be coordinated between a qualified landscape professional and the geotechnical engineer. The landscape plan proposes unspecified size poplar trees 30 foot on center and erosion control hydroseed. Appropriate size, species, and planting ratios shall be provided on a revised plan. A tree replacement ratio of 1.5 trees planted for each tree removed is acceptable. The minimum height of trees should be six to eight feet at planting. The landscape plan should also include shrubs and ground - cover to compensate for the loss of existing vegetation. Again, the geotechnical engineer must also be consulted and sign the landscape plan. The landscape plan shall use native species to enhance both temporary and long term stability of the slopes and to mitigate for the removal of existing vegetation. The landscape plan must also consider potential conflicts with the existing and proposed utilities. 4. I will ask the city attorneys office if they have a sample hold harmless agreement that may be helpful for you drafting one for this project. 5. The city will not refund Parklane $36,089.51 for off -site drainage mitigation and require the developer of Division II to pay the $36,089.51 with the Division II final plat as you have requested. The staff response and subsequent City Council final plat approval of SEPA condition number five (enclosed) clearly identifies the total cost of $60,696.00 is required with final plat approval for Division I because Division II has been cleared, resulting in an increase of runoff from Division II. No portion of the total fee of $60.696.00 was considered a deposit. For comparison purposes see the staff response in the final plat report to SEPA condition number eight (enclosed). For SEPA condition number eight, the staff response clearly indicated approval of an incremental final plat pro-rata payment of street improvements based on the percentage of lots in Divisions I and II. If you want reimbursement of the $36,089.51, than you must obtain payment from the new owners of Division II. I hope this information provides you clear direction to proceed on the application. Please be advised that review comments from previous correspondence still applies. If you have any questions, please contact me at (253) 661-4019. Sincerely, Harris Senior Planner enc Greg Fewins, Principal Planner Stephen Clifton, Public Works Development Services Manager John Zipper, Giles Engineering L.\PRMSYSU30CUMENTISEP97 00.01\CD121797.DOC a IN Staff Report - Final Plat Heritage Woods Div. I Page 11 STAFF RESPONSE: This condition has been met. See additional staff comments under sub item 4(d) below. A wetland mitigation, creation, and enhancement plan was approved by the city prior to issuance of construction plans for the subdivision improvements. The wetland mitigation, creation, and enhancement plan met the requirements of SEPA mitigation measure 4 (a & b), and has been implemented and accepted by the city's consulting wetland biologist. Performance bonding for wetland maintenance and contingency shall be provided by the developer prior to final plat recording. c. All required wetland mitigation improvements, except monitoring, shall be completed and accepted by the Director of Community Development Services prior to submitting the final plat for final approval. In any event, all mitigation work shall be completed within six months from the time wetland or wetland setback areas are initially disturbed through related subdivision construction activity. STAFF RESPONSE: This condition has been met, as discussed in staff response 4(b) above. d The applicant shall pay for services of a qual fed professional selected and retained by the city to review the wetland mitigation plan and other relevant information, conduct periodic inspections through the construction phase, issue a written report to the Director of Community Development Services stating the project complies with requirements of the mitigation plan, and to conduct and report to the director on the Status of the monitoring program. STAFF RESPONSE: The applicant has paid for the services of the city's wetland consultant through the design and construction phase. The applicant will pay all outstanding consultant review invoices prior to final plat recording. Prior to plat recording, a cash deposit will also be provided by the developer to cover city consultant review of the approved five year wetland monitoring program. 5. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall construct downstream drainage improvements identified in the December 20, 1991, Preliminary Drainage Analysis, prepared by Jaeger Engineering for the site, as required by the Public Works Director. In lieu of constructing these improvements, prior to final plat approval and at the discretion of the Public Works Director, the applicant may pay $60, 696. 00 as their pro -rasa contribution towards implementation of these improvements STAFF RESPONSE: The developer has selected to pay the pro -rats contribution towards design and construction of the downstream drainage improvements. The amount to be paid by the developer prior to recording Division I final plat is $60,696. A partial contribution based on the ratio of lots in Division I to the number of lots in the entire subdivision is not Staff Report - Final Plat Heritage Woods Div. I Page 12 recommended since Division II development area has been cleared, resulting in an increase in runoff from Division II at this time. 6_ All homes located within this subdivision shall be properly sound insulated to achieve a level of 45 Ldn within general habitable space and 40 Ldn within bedrooms, consistent with the Uniform Building Code and other regulations, as required by the Building Official. STD RESPONSE: This condition will be implemented during permitting and construction of homes. In addition, a note to this effect has been placed on sheet 5 of 7 on the final plat. T Any development within designated open space areas shall be designed and constructed, as required by the Director of Community Development Services, to protect and enhance wildlife habitat to the maximum extentfeasible. This effort may include, but is not limited to, revegetation and restoration of disturbed areas, retention and/or replacement of Significant vegetation, and use of vegetation or other features which provide habitat for native wildlife species STAFF RESPONSE: This condition has been met. Prior to site construction, an approved wetland mitigation, creation, and enhancement plan was approved by the City of Federal Way. The wetland mitigation, creation, and buffer enhancement plan has been approved by the city's consulting wetland biologist. All non -buildable open space areas disturbed during construction have been re -planted with native vegetation. 8. Beyond required frontage improvements, the applicant shall constructMilitary Road South widened to four lanes with provisions for bicycles, sidewalks, signal modifications, illumination, street trees, and property acquisition from 1-5 to South 288th Street, as required by the Public Works Director prior to final plat approval. In lieu of constructing these improvements, prior to final plat approval and at the discretion of the Public Works Director, the applicant may pay $11, 600 as their pro-rata contribution towards, implementation of these improvements STAFF RESPONSE: The developer has elected to pay a pro-rata contribution in lieu of constructing street improvements beyond the frontage of the site. The amount to be paid for Division I is $4,756.00 which is 41 percent of the $11,600. This contribution is based on a ratio of the 45 lots in Division I to the total of 111 lots in the approved preliminary plat. The $4,756.00 must be provided prior to recording Division I. 9. Prior to final plat approval, Military Road South shall be paved from the north and south termini of the required right-of-way improvements abutting the site with tapers to match into the existing pavement improvements The tapers shall be provided as approved by the Public Works Director. 12/09/97 Mr. Jim Harris Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1 st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY Re: Grading Permit Application Tracts H & J Dear Jim; PARI(LANE ParkLane Executive Center 31620-23rd Avenue South #320 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Telephone: (206) 946-3652 Fax: (206) 946-3580 As I have advised you by letter, we contracted with Schneider Homes to complete the Grading Permit Application and receive the Grading Permit by Jan. 8/97. In response to my letter, you sent me the attached letter of Nov. 12/97. Your letter advised that our Application was complete, but that you needed additional information to continue review of the Application. In response to your request, we provided the following: Item 1. - Geo-Technical Report On Nov. 18th, I hand delivered two copies of the Golder Report, completing their review of the stabilization repairs and addressing the elements in the Federal Way Code. Item 2. Revised grading to acknowledge Wetland Buffer The 10/6/97 Revised Grading Plan eliminates any encroachment of fill or retaining walls within the Wetland Buffer behind lots 57 & 58. The enclosed 12/9/97 revision eliminates the silt fence that the 10/6/97 Plan showed within the Wetland Buffer. Item 3. Landscaping Plan A Landscape Plan, prepared by Schneider's Landscape Company, was provided to the City on 11/14/97 for review and approval. Item 4. Height Restrictions. Schneider Homes has been provided a copy of your Nov. 12/97 letter with your suggestion that Schneider make application now for a single height variance for all of the lots requiring height variance. Item 5. Liability and Indemnification Agreement. I have requested a Draft Agreement from Schneider Homes, who will own the Tracts and complete the grading, as soon as we obtain the Grading Permit. Please provide me a copy of a similar Agreement you have requested as part of a Grading Permit issued by the City_ W d e are commute to quality, valve and service to fidfiU our customers dreams andc.l'ce't'!t their e prctatimrs. Item 6. Geo-Technical Design Standard. The Golder and Assoc. Report submitted Nov. 18, provides for the recommended Design Standard Measurement. Item 7. Payment of City's Geo-Technical Consultant's fee. On 11/29/97, Stephen Clifton faxed me a proposal from Giles and Assoc. for $2,200 in consulting fees. The proposal included Monitoring of the Grading after issuance of the Permit. On the same day, I advised the City and John Zipper of Giles and Assoc. by fax, to revise his proposal, excluding monitoring of the grading, which will be done by Schneider Homes. I am still waiting for the revised Giles' proposal to review and approve. As we have completed all of the items of your Nov. 12/97 letter, the SEPA review should have begun. Yesterday, you advised me that you are still waiting for the revised Giles and Assoc. Report, and that the review period will be 45 days from the date of receipt of the Giles Report. We should not be held responsible nor suffer the time delays of your consultant's lack of cooperation in expediting review requested by the City. Please advise me of the most expeditious method and schedule for completing our Grading Application. Sincerely, David W. Morrison cc: Greg Moore Stephen Clifton Dennis Alfredson Gino Nonni DEC-11-97 THU 12:44 RECEIVED BY LQlIlMLfN Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT P. 01 12/09/97 DEC 1 11997 Mr. Jim Harris Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1 st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Re. Grading Permit Application Tracts H & J Dear Jim; PARKLANE ParkLane Executive Center 31620-23rd Avenue South #i320 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Telephone. (206) 946-3652 Fax: (206) 946-3580 As I have advised you by letter, we contracted with Schneider Homes to complete the Grading Permit Application and receive the Grading Permit by Jan. 8/97. In response to my letter, you sent me the attached letter of Nov. 12197. Your letter advised that our Application was complete, but that you needed additional information to continue review of the Application. In response to your request, we provided the following: Item 1. - Geo-Technical Report On Nov. 18th, I hand delivered two copies of the Golder Report, completing their review of the stabilization repairs and addressing the elements in the Federal Way Code. Item 2. Revised grading to acknowledge Wetland Buffer The 10/6/97 Revised Grading Plan eliminates any encroachment of fill or retaining walls within the Wetland Buffer behind lots 57 & 58. The enclosed 12/9/97 revision eliminates the silt fence that the 10/6/97 Plan showed within the Wetlan6 . Buffer. Item 3. Landscaping Plan A Landscape Plan, prepared by Schneider's Landscape Company, was provided to the City on 11 /14/97 for review and approval. Item 4. Height Restrictions. Schneider Homes has been provided a copy of your Nov. 12/97 fetter with your suggestion that Schneider make application now for a single height variance for all of the lots requiring height variance. Item 5. Liability and Indemnification Agreement. I have requested a Draft Agreement from Schneider Homes, who will own the Tracts and complete the grading, as soon as we obtain the Grading Permit. Please provide me a copy of a similar Agreement you have requested as part of a Grading Permit issued by the City We are committed to quality, value and service - L..LII � J.�L 12/11/97 THU 11:44 [T%/RX N0 696-e DEC-11-97 THU 12:45 P.02 Item 6. Geo-Technical Design Standard. The Golder and Assoc. Report submitted Nov. 18, provides for the recommended Design Standard Measurement. Item 7. Payment of City's Geo-Technical Consultant's fee. On 11/29/97, Stephen Clifton faxed me a proposal from Giles and Assoc. for $2,200 in consulting fees. The proposal included Monitoring of the Grading after issuance of the Permit. On the same day, I advised the City and John Zipper of Giles and Assoc. by fax, to revise his proposal, excluding monitoring of the grading, which will be done by Schneider Homes. I am still waiting for the revised Giles' proposal to review and approve. As we have completed all of the items of your Nov. 12/97 letter, the SEPA review should have begun. Yesterday, you advised me that you are still waiting for the revised Giles and Assoc. Report, and that the review period will be 45 days from the date of receipt of the Giles Report We should not be held responsible nor suffer the time delays of your consultant's lack of cooperation in expediting review requested by the City. Please advise me of the most expeditious method and schedule for completing our Grading Application. cc: Greg Moore Stephen Clifton Dennis Alfredson Gino Nonni Sincerely, David W. Morrison 12/11/97 THU 11:44 [TX/RX NO 68961 eFj, P - g 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH December 1, 1997 John Zipper P.E. Giles Engineering Associates 19019 36th Avenue West, Suite G Lynnwood, WA 98036 RE: Heritage Woods Tracts H and J Slope Grading (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 Enclosed please find a copy of the November 17, 1997 report by Golder and Associates for the Heritage Woods Tracts H and J. A copy of the Jaeger Engineering plans sheets 1 and 2 dated October 6, 1997 are also enclosed. The submittal by the project developer is for the proposed 25,000 cubic yards of fill and grading to accommodate the proposed residences. Your review must include review of the project for compliance with Federal Way City Code Section 22-1286(c)(1-4), in order to modify preliminary plat conditions and for the SEPA review of the 25,000 cubic yards of fill. Please provide an itemized cost estimate for your review of the enclosed plans. Please indicate if you think additional submittals and reviews will be required. Please do not initiate your review of the plans and reports until we have provided written authorization to proceed and approval of the cost estimate. We will provide a copy of your review cost estimate to the developer for his approval prior to initiation of your review. Please contact me at (253)661-4019 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ��aarris Senior Planner C: Stephen Clifton, Development Services Manager L:\PRMSYS\DOCUMENT\SEP97-00.01\CD12197.DOC 11 / 17/97 Mr. Jim Harris Assoc. Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1 st Way So. Federal Way, WA 98003 PARKU.L ILJL NE COMMUNI RECEIVED DV �' EN �EPARTMEN T ParkLane Executive Center Re: Heritage Woods - Tracts H & J Grading Permit Application Dear Jim; 31620-23rd Avenue South #320 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Telephone: (206) 946-3652 Fax: (206) 946-3580 Further to your request, please find enclosed a landscape plan submitted to the City as partial requirements for our Tracts H & J Grading Permit Application. The landscape plan was completed by Daniel Richter, of Landscape Professionals on behalf of Schneider Homes, Inc. As you know, Schneider Homes has contracted to purchase Tracts H & J once Parklane has obtained the Grading Permit. Therefore, I have asked Schneider Homes, who will be performing the grading work and building the homes within the graded lots, to provide the landscape plan. Schneider Homes recognizes that completion of the landscape plan will be a condition of the Grading Permit. Please review and advise if the plan submitted is adequate. Sincerely, David W. Morrison cc: Dennis Alfredson, Schneider Homes, Inc. Jim Jaeger, Jaeger Eng. We are committed to quality, vahie and service to fdrea our d twcr d dreams and e�rrrt�d their ex} efafions. CITY YBJ�j33530 1ST WAY SOUTH November 12, 1997 Mr. David Morrison Parklane Ventures Inc. 6U0U F I L F (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 31620 - 23rd Avenue South Suite 320 Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Heritage Woods, Modification to Preliminary Plat Conditions 6 and 7, Tracts H and J, File Nos. SEP 97-0001 & UPR97-0003 Dear Mr. Morrison: I have reviewed the Lot Grading Plan and SEPA checklist submitted on October 13, 1997 for the proposed Heritage Woods Tracts H and J lot grading project. Your proposal is to modify preliminary plat conditions 6 and 7 to allow filling 25,000 to 30,000 cubic yards of material on Tracts H and J. This letter is a follow-up to our phone conversation on November 5, 1997 regarding your most recent submittal. The application is now considered complete, however, several elements of the application need revision and/or additional information in order to continue review of the application. As indicated in item number two of my March 21, 1997 letter to you, a geotechnical report must be provided to address the elements in Federal Way City Code (FWCC) section 22-1286(1-4) such as slope stability, landslide hazard, sloughing, seismic hazards, groundwater, seeps, springs, surface waters, vegetation, foundation design, methods for impact mitigation, and any other information necessary to evaluate the proposal. The geo- technical report must analyze current and proposed conditions. To make a more efficient project review, the geo-technical report should be formatted to clearly respond to each item in FWCC section 22-1286 (1-4). The two Golder Engineering reports dated July 1997 are not entirely representative of field conditions discovered during additional soil testing conducted during the October slope stabilization project. The Golder reports must be updated based on this new information and direction by Giles Engineering. 2" The Jaeger Engineering Lot Grading Plan shows the clearing limits and limit of construction fencing approximately five feet into the wetland D buffer behind lots 57 and 58. Per item six in my March 21, 1997 letter, intrusion into the wetland buffer area is only allowed by approval of the Hearing Examiner and upon meeting FWCC section 22- 1359(d)(1-6). Revise the grading plan and provide a written commentary on how the proposed rockeries and grading will not intrude into the wetland setback area. David Morrison November 12, 1997 Page 2 Alternatively, a Process IV Hearing Examiner approval to allow temporary construction impacts to the wetland buffer is required under separate application. Provide a landscape plan showing at a minimum the size, spacing, planting specifications, plant species, etc for all disturbed areas. The landscape plan°§hall use native species and shall be designed and signed by a qualified landscape professional and also signed by the geotechnical engineer. The geotechnical report shall be closely coordinated with the landscape plan in order to enhance both temporary and long term stability of the slopes. 4. This review to modify the plat condition is an administrative review by the Director of Community Development Services and will not provide relief for the height of the future homes on the filled lots. As previously discussed, the height of the future homes is required to be measured from the existing grade. Should this Process III application to fill the lots be approved, the building elevation will be measured from the existing (prier) grade. Using the prior grade, construction of homes on several of the lots will require Process IV height variances by the Hearing Examiner. We may be able to process a single height variance for all of the lots requiring a height variance. 5. Because of the nature of the proposal within the geologically hazardous areas, a condition of this permit approval by the City of Federal Way will require an agreement releasing and indemnifying the city from any damage or liability resulting from any development activity on the subject property. The agreement will be recorded with King County Records and will run with the property. Pursuant to FWCC section 22-1225, the agreement will require approval of the City Attorney. Please provide a draft of this agreement for the City Attorney's review. 6. A condition of the Community Development Director's approval will require the Geotechnical Engineer who prepares the report and plans to design the project to meet an acceptable geotechnical design standard. City staff is currently discussing the acceptable design standard measurement, and will provide you with that information upon reaching a decision. 7. Pursuant to FWCC section 22-1286(d)(2) the project proponent is responsible for the professional engineering services retained by the City to review the soils and geo-technical report. Giles Engineering will continue to conduct the geotechnical review for the city. A scope of work and review cost estimate will be prepared for your approval prior to additional review by Giles Engineering. I hope this information provides you clear direction to proceed on the application. Please be advised that additional review comments will be provided following submittal of the geotechnical information. If you have any questions, please contact me at 661-4019. David Morrison November 12, 1997 Page 3 Sincerely, ri arris Senior Planner L:\PRMSYS\DMUNMNTiSEP97-00.01\CD11597.DOC cc: Gary Barnet , Senior Dcvclopment Engineer 7obnZipper, Giles Engines gins Greg Fewins, Principal Planner MEMO To: Gary Barnett k From: Jim Har!)� �r- Subject: Heritagds Slope Stabilization Date: September 25, 1997 I have reviewed the Tract H and J Slope Repair Plan and accompanying letter prepared by Jaeger Engineering and received by the City on September 19, 1997. Please provide this memo to Tim Jaeger in addition to your review comments. The slope repair is phase I of this project, while phase II is looldng at a larger proposal to modify conditions of preliminary plat approval to allow more extensive filling and grading of tracts H and J. The comments contained herein apply to the slope repair only, and not the phase II proposal. The plan must be revised to address the comments below. Intrusion into the 40% slope area and it's associated buffer on lots 52 and 53 (Tract H) is not allowed at this time because of preliminary plat condition number six. In order to fill and grade in the 40 % slope or it's buffer, preliminary plat condition number six must be modified (as is being pursued through phase II). As I discussed with Jim Jaeger on September 24, 1997, the fill and grade for the slope repair should constitute the least amount necessary to stabilize the site, and filling and grading should stay out of the sensitive area and it's buffer for this phase (I). 2. The plan must identify the approximate fill quantity for the project. 3. The plan must identify how the toe of fill will match or transition into the existing grade, especially along the fill limit line adjacent to the lot 55 and 56 border. 4. Erosion control methods must be shown on the plan. 5. Orange construction equipment limits fencing must be shown on the plan. 6. The plan must identify the on -site haul routes for the fill. Will the fill be provided from 25th Place South or from the gravel maintenance road below the lots? 7. SEPA review must conclude prior to city authorization of the slope repair. The applicant has requested an SEPA emergency exemption, due to potential timing and weather constraints. Staff will support a SEPA emergency exemption in order to expedite the slope repair before fall weather threatens further slope damage. Revised plans satisfactorily addressing these comments must be received prior to issuance of a SEPA emergency exemption. L:\PRMSYS\DOCUNIEN-nUPR97 00.03\92597.DOC CITY OF 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH September 5, 1997 (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 Mr. David Morrison Via Fax Parklane Ventures 31620 23rd Ave So Federal Way, WA 98003 Subject. Heritage Woods Slope Failure and Erosion Control Measures SUB92-0005 Dear Mr. Morrison: The purpose of this letter is to respond to your August 19, 1997 letter to Cary Roe. In your fax, you claim that you are "holding the City fully responsible for any future damage that occurs to the fill section within 23rd Avenue South and Tracts H & Y and that "you cannot accept the responsibility for further damage caused by City delays." It is necessary to remind you that on April 7, 1997, Gary Barnett, Senior Development Engineer, sent you a letter stating that "..on April 3, 1997... the City discovered that the slope has slumped out and down at lots #54, #53, and #52 on 25th Place South. The embankment (20-40 cubic yards) slid into the Native Growth Protection Easement below, and migrated toward the pond. This area should receive prompt attention as the sidewalk and the roadway above are at risk. A silt fence should be installed at a minimum to prevent further migration of the fine materials. The slope should be stabilized immediately to prevent further damage. Upslope (across 25th Place South), surface water control may be required. Please provide the City with engineered plans for the remediation of the failed slope and possible consequential damage to other improvements. Please call for inspection and provide compaction testing. " Subsequent conversations provided clarification of what should be submitted to the City. The City fully understands the importance of repairing the slide in a timely manner, which is why we repeatedly requested information necessary to address this issue. Your claim that you are "holding the City fully responsible for any future damage that occurs to the fill section within 23rd Avenue South and Tracts H & Y and that you "cannot accept the responsibility for further damage caused by City delays" is indefensible as it was Parklane's failure to respond in a timely fashion that put you in this current problematic situation. Indeed, the fact that you took over three months, specifically 15 1/2 weeks, to respond to the City's request for information is tantamount to an invitation to the problems you are currently experiencing. Mr. David Morrison September 5, 1997 Page 2 At the end of July, you requested the City use the expedited review process to condense the review time of the reports. As such, I immediately began preparing a contract to use Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. as an independent contractor to review the reports prepared by Golder and Associates. Giles Engineering met with city staff on August 6, 1997 and subsequently reviewed the Golder report, prepared a draft letter containing opinions and conclusions, and submitted it to the City on August 15, 1997, nine days following the meeting. Upon receipt of the letter, I called to let you know we received the draft analysis and would review it on August 18, 1997. Gary Barnett reviewed the draft and requested Giles Engineering to refine the analysis and resubmit. On August 19, 1997, the City faxed you the draft analysis so you could review and prepare accordingly per the comments of the independent consultant. We received a final copy of the letter by Giles Engineering on August 25, 1997 and faxed you a copy the following morning. Subsequently, you faxed us a letter from Golder Associates on August 28, 1997 which responds to the August 25, 1997 letter from Giles Engineering. The City is currently attempting to set up a meeting between City staff, the City's consultant, and your consultants to bring some resolution to this issue. If you have questions, please call me at 661-4109. Sincerer STEPHEN CLIN TON, AICP Development Services Manager sc jd a: Gary C. Bataett, P.E., Senior Development Enerc r Cary M. Rae, PuWc Wodv Director Jim Harri., Araodgc Pl n r Jim Pryd, Public Worm Inrpeaor Pmjea Fde Dtq Pik L-WWASrSDO y"M OOASWW0007DW W;RECEIV D BY . SEP 04-RdU - . KtHT. Wfi 56031 raX 717-5320 RECEIVED 8Y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT September 18, 1997 EP .' 9 4997 Stephan Clifton, Dev. Services Mgr. City of Federal Way Dept. of Public Works 33530 1 st Way So. Federal Way, Wa. 98003 RE. Heritage Woods- Tract H & J Slope Stability -Plan Dear Stephan, As discussed in our last.meeting,-1 am, submitting a packageahat addresses our proposed repair of the slope failure along S. 25th PI: 1 am: attaching a letter from Jim Johnson of.Golder & Associates that justifies the proposed interceptor drain.along the base of the existing fill. This letter should answer the questions that were raised at the meeting regarding the interceptor trench. I am -also enclosing a plan of the slope repair project that includes an interceptor trench detail and locations of the interceptor trench, the maximum extent of the. repair fill, the existing toe of slope, the slide area, future lot lines and existing utilities.`' Another item requested at the meeting was a letter requesting an emergency exemption',from theSEPA process.to proceed with this repair before the wet weather is upon us. Please accept this letter as our formal request for this emergency SEPA exemption. We have notified our contractor that this work -will begin early next week. The weather should . be conducive at that time. I anticipate that the City will allow this work to commence during this period. Please forward this information to the necessary. staff. Feel free to call me with any messages. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 9, Oao� James J. Jaeger, P.E. SENT BY:SEATTLE 8-18-07 : 12:18 GOLDER ASSOCIATES 5206;# 2/ 6 Golder Assodvles Inc. 4104 -1481h Avenue. N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 Telephone (425) 683-0777 fox (425) 882-U" September 19, 1997 ParkL,ane Ventures, Inc. 31620 23rd Avenue South Suite 020 Federal Way, Washington 98003 AI7'ENTION: Mr. David Morrison RE. FRENCH DRAIN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS HERITAGE WOODS TRACT H AND J OF DIVISION 1 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON IT r Our rcf.: 973.1122 The City of Federal Way requested at our meeting on September 8, 1997 that ►sT provide additional information ou the design and construction of the French drain at the above refaencod project. In addition, they requested cbuifcation on the occurrence of groundwater seepage and dsc likely source and path of groundwater in the area of the slope failure. As pant of the t'mal plume of lot grading the City reclucsted a slope stability analysis of the rcpairod slope and the final lot grading configuration. The stability analysis will be provided in a separate letter at a later date. GROUNDWATER AND SEEPAGE We have shown the Location of groundwater seepage observed in our test pit investigation on dw attached cross section (Figum 1). In addition, we have shown the thickness of the fill crnbankmcnt basal on the gradingplan by Jaeger Engineering. The soil types are basc,;d on the test pit observations. The [cation of the proposed French drain is also shown. A plan drawing and detail of the French drain system based on our recornmendatione is being submitted to the City by Jaeger Engineering. The seepage we observed in our test pits and observed vn the ground surface near the toe of the slope appears to be groundwater traveling in an outNcash sand layer below the 25th place South fill embankment. The groundwater vxpage w-at observed at a depth of about rive feet in TP-3 near the contact berwocn the fill embantonent and the native ground. We excavate d a test pit on the upslopc side oF25th Placc South across the street from the slope failure. The test pit encountered native outwash Saud to a depth of eight feet. No groundwater seepage v;w observed and no mottling or iron staining was obscrvead which may indicate a shallow fluctuating water table. Based on these observations, we feel that the location of the French drain shown in our June 23, 1997 report (Figure 6 and 7) is a sound choice for intercepting the seepage and pmentiag saturation of the future rill to be placed on the slope. The quantity of groundwater that the French drain will intercept is difficult to estimate. The total amount of seepage we observed occurring at the ground surface along the toe of the slope in May, 1997 was probably no more than about tar to fifteen gallons per minute however the drain tnay inle-rc :pt more or less than that amount. We have conservatively recommended that a six inch diameter corrugated perforated polyethylene pipe be used in the OFFICES IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA, GERMANY, HUNGARY, ITALY, SWtDFN, UNITED KINGDOM. UNITED STATES SENT BY:SEATTLE ; 9-18-97 ; 12:18 ; GOLDER ASSOCIATES- 5206;# 3/ 6 September 18, 1997 2 French drain. 'The pipe should meet the epcciiir,ations contained in ASSHTO M-252 "Corrugated Polyethylene Drainage Tubing 3" -10" Diamoter." 973-1122 Shallow water seepage wab observed in an excavation fit the roadway. We discussed that seep in our review comment response lettex dated August 27, 1997. 'Are: believe the source of the shallow seepage is from a utility trench beefed undor the sidewalk. We do not believe the seepage was a significant factor in the slope failure. However, we support the remrdiation roeommendations provided by Mr. Jim Jacgcr of Jaeger Engineering to the City dated August 25, 1497. We trust this letter meets your needs. if you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. Richard D. Luark, P.E. Senior Engineer Ass late Gcolo RDUJGJ/rlw cc: Jinn Jaeger, Jaegeer Engineering oviajda.&. Golder Associates SENT BY.,SEATTLE ; 9-18-97 ; 12:18 ; GOLDER ASSOCIATES- 5206;# 4/ 6 FIGURE Golder Msoclates SENT BY:SEATTLE ; 9-18-97 ; 12:18 GOLDER ASSOCIATES, S206;# 5/ 6 Pavement Sidewalk Main Scarp kwlbwnkine., F'�� A�+�Slump/MudtiowArea *7.. TP-3 DiiglnE MIR \ 17 x 1 Saba 1 PF*ACT NO. e79 11" OAA"NO NO. 72788 DATE $new cRAWM eV Co • SENT BY:SEATTLE 9-18-97 ; 12:19 GOLDER ASSOCIATES- 5206:# 61 6 oe of Fill Slope Zohr ofsls04pe a f�+'�o7row D 9t 1 1 � 1 ,Colluviurti'- s,/1rci4a! (Till TP-4 Storm Drain Stub Out Boundary ��►dflow of Lot ,t)ebrla O 12" Storm Drain a 10 20 FEET EIGURE I FIELD CROSS-SECTION B-B' PARKLANEMERITAGE VYOODSMA Golder Associates AUG-28-97 THU 11:12 RECEIVE[ Y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN, EPARTMENT P. 01 8/28/97 Mr. Jim Harris — zo % e F Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1 st Way So. Federal Way, WA 98003 AUG 2 8 1997 Re: Heritage Woods - Tracts H & J Slope Stabilization & Reparation Dear Jim; PARKLANE ParkLane Executive Center 31620-23rd Avenue South #320 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Telephone: (206) 946-W2 Fax: (206) 946-3580 Please find attached the response letter from Golder and Associates to the Giles Geo-Technical Report provided to the City. Please submit a copy of the Golder Report to Mr. John Zipper, P.E. at Giles and ask him to review and complete his recommendations to the City. If Mr. Zipper is not fully satisfied with the Golder and Associates response, I recommend that Jim Johnson from Golder and John Zipper from Giles discuss and resolve their differences directly by telephone and make whatever revisions to their recommendations so that the City receives recommendations for repair that Parklane, our contractors, Kohl Excavating and Continental Dirt, and the City can all agree with, so that the work can be performed as soon as possible. I will be out of town until Sept. 15, but Jim Jaeger will be waiting for approval from the City, so that he may direct our contractors to complete the approved repairs. Please call Jim at 850-0934 with any questions. Sin erely, David W. Morrison cc: Gary Barnett, P.E., Public Works Dept. City of Federal Way Jim Johnson, Golder 8. Associates Jim Jaeger, Jaeger Engineering Jerry Schneider, Schneider Homes, Inc. Dennis Alfredson, Schneider Homes, Inc. Gino Nonni, Parklane Ventures, Inc. We are committed to qualify, value and service a_ L.37 ...._ _..,... .,� 08/28/97 THU 11:15 [T%/R% NO 5595j RUG-28-97 THU 11:13 &uiiT BY, SE Ti'LE GokierAt PWOWe trsa. 4104 -148th Avenue. N.E. Rodrmnd. WA WW Teiophone (425) 8m-W7 FDX (425) 882$398 Augdt 27,1997 8-27-97 3 �$��� ASSOCl/ S-* rnMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Golder paikC.ane Ventuzes, Inc. Slf 2a 23rd Avenue south Suite #320 FederalWay, Washingtmn- 99003 NON: Mr.IJavid M0rrb0" AUG 2 8 1997 R : RESPONSE TD DRAFT VVIE'W COMMENTS BY GILE5 ENGINEERING RSSOC1A 1H5,'lt C uWTAGE' ooM TRACT H AND ] OF DWISION 1 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Dear David: Our ref.; 973-1122 We h va read flag drafLrsview commmts prapased by Giles Engineering Dissociates, inc dated August 25,1991. Tlwro conwients were prepared by Giles in regDnse our gertftchniml Teporta dated june 2a,1997 and July l4,1997. Ourresparue tip the c mmersts are included in the fullowing sectiors. Several of the review cquuner►ta focused on proposed MSE walls alOng the tnc of the 01opc (third and fourth bullets). Ciles proposed two alb'rnativcs to W811 r$tairdng walla: filling beyond em property buwWary to allow for acceptable M slDpes; Or benched MSE wars. Assuning these alternatives be�dacceptable M E wall would he completed and includdime to be e �stab�tY table aft, Wtives. 'Thee de�p3 of a P. 02 #2/5 analrus. The rem inirtg leview mnunenb focsed an the clwactetsxation of the existing roadway fill eu&ann)=2nt and its long-WWstability. In partictxl.'r the Giles letter raises concerns that long- term setfleawrA xa y affect tho b1tus+e houses and the exlstingraadway, sidewallz and u'tiRties. We understand tha gv0tcchrura1 aancerw raised by CA -es, in particWar, the lack of existing c=trur ion uwruto=ing data on the compaction and character of the embankment M. We tnmt d atc4ruLwtfon of the informatian in our report and additional j tbnmt1on presented below should adequately address tbz impa Cant issues raised in Giles' letter. in general, vie believe that fite potential for long-term settlement of the eu%bankment fill wM be mininmai and w.+itHn comixuctivrt iolerat=s and the multatti slopes stable prvvided the xecarnmend atiom in our reports and proper fold cDWtmctian methods, as clarified below, are followed and field verified by our staff- Ciarificati= of alas understanding of the exiating fill aanditions and geetedmical recauwjendatj0ns are Induded below. ngicws IN AUffiHAI IA. CANADA, C, RMANY. tiUNGAIM ITALY, SWEDEN. LUTED ION=M. UNITED STATES 08/28/97 THU 11:15 [TX/RY NO 55951 AUG-28-97 THU 11:14 P.03 5t' 8�'•StA 1 '-,8 -27-97 , 16.44 GOiD�±R ASSOC IA �'?r Augmt 27,1997 SLOPE STABIi.M W34M The failura that occurred this past w4iter an the existing elope was a shallow surficial mud debris flow and did not affect the deeper soils within the fill eulbarilvnent a nd did not affect the roadway, sideuralk, curb or utilities. Given the slope of file existing fill "ff.IV or flatter) and rho drape of lire AWna+lve slope contact (4H:1V overall, Iaeally IRYV under the up hill side of t1te road) a deeper rotational or black sliding failure is not a viable failure mode an the existing slope and even more remote or►ee tl,e slope French drain is installed And the embankment filled and regraded to a flatter alope. Similar shallow mud/debris flaws could oww $gain on the slope this winter if ra r+emd➢abonworkis done. If they remediatlon recommendations are followed the rmuttant slopes will be flatter and the groundwater seepage will be Intercepted thus elivariating t1w mud/debris flow type failure as a viable failure alternative as woo1L GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE We cmmideied alternate locations for construction of a French drain or interceptor drain. The locations included the upslope side of25thPlam South and higher on the existing embankment slope. We slid net feel that we could adequately intercept die groundwater upslope of 25th Place South because the native soils d= were composed of permeable sand that would allow the water to bypass 01m drain. After completion of our gcote bxiical reports we dug a test pit on the upslope side of 25th Place South while attending an on -site xmeting to explore the possibility of an alternate drain location. The test pit was excavated just upslope of the sidewalk across the street from about Lot 53. The test pit sons consisted of compact, fine to medium sand with occasional liockyafragments to the full depth of the pit, about eight feet No groundwater seepage: or wet sand was observed in the pit while there was still same minor seepage cocmIngnear the foe of the f`iff wnLardnent. It was clear +e seepage observed on the lower portion of the fill embankment vas flowing at a deeper elevation than could reasonably be 3rdei owpted withFranch drains in the vicinity of the mad. Even an the lower portions of the slope the seepage was concentrated at the contad between the f ill and the native soils. We rea mmd that the most reliable plasae to capkwe and convey this seepage water was at the lower portion of the caiw anent where we muld efficiently identify and capture it with a robust Frenchdralm LONG. PERM Based on observations and herl prates of the fill made in our test pits, in the mud/debris flow scarp and in an excavationin the street on 25th Place South to investigate a pavement subgrade problem, the fill consists of a well compacted sand and gravel hill with 1ALk to some MIL The fill was deaved from en-sile sources and aeaarding to the ccantmetor was placed in about one foot thick lift$ and compacted with a vibratory do mraller. Amordingto the gradingplan topography drawingNo. G2 byJaeger Golder Asmoolaiss 08/28/97 THU 11:15 [T%/R% NO 55951 AUG-28-97 THU 11:15 P.04 S►LKI, RPM UOL UM ASSOUl f -`Si ; $ 4/ b August 27,1997 S 973-1122 Engineering the roadway embankment fdl thkknes8 is neatest at the crest of The slope on lots 54 and 55 where it is about 12 to 14 feet thick. The fill tl*krms rapidly decreases to the south toward lots 55 through 58 where only a fa v foot ddck wedge fill is lomtrd at the crest of t1w slope. To the north the flit maximum fill thickness thins rapidly a=cm the crest of lot 53 and is only a few feet thick on lot 52. in general only ?lots 53, 54 and 55 have fill thidmeam greaber Umn about five feet We du not anticipate any significant longarmaettlementwiddntheembardwwntstructuralfiilitself. (Surfisialremedial treatments are discussed below-) Based on observations from most of our test pits of organics mixed of th soil at the eontactbetween tha fill and the native soils, we believe that topsoil sttippingmay not have been adequately completed prior to filling the slope. Based on subsequent convenatlons with the contractor, the slopes were grubbed and no brush or trees were leftin place. Therefore, we do not su3pect the presence of significant organic deposits within the fill. The presence of orgaraim we observed beneath the fill nay result in additional long tarntsettlaments of about 1A to 1 Inch provided the pre load mmmmendations in our report are followed. Additional field verification of the character of the e)& trg fill will be done during the excavation for construction of the French drain and construction of the benches for the additional fill placement. An evaluation of the long4am. performance of the roadway, sidewalk and uti'lifles on 25th Place South was not within our ape of work However, the sidewalks, curb and pavenvntr. have not exhUted any signs of distress related to settlement or fat um of f1w em ban awpt fill slope in the fifteen months since they were constructed. Because of the grarmlar aa.t um of the embankment M and the relative permeability as exhibited by the seepage, we would expect any potential settlement of the fill to occur rather quickly and some signs ofdisbess to have exhi iced than -selves by now. We investigated a small failure of the pavement subgrade that occurred in the roadway upslope of lot 53 during this aun rater. The asphalt pavement hoar the dowrslope curb approximately adjacent to lot 53 broke apart during heavy truckhouling activities. We observed the area of the faguze (about five by ten feet in plan area) once it was excavated to a depth of about two #eat. Wet saturated fill was rermwed from the exmva#iorL This saturated subgrmde fill was li6ly the material reFened to by the Public Works staff as having a jello-llW cmlatuwy. Once a firm bottom to the excavation was reached at a depth of about two feet the excavation was stopped. We observed a amall.s cep entering the excavation from the curb side (dowm1ope side) of the hole. The somm of dw seepage was believed to be emanating from pipe bedding ina utMty trench beneath the sidewalk The structural MI sunaunding the sides and bottom of the area excavated adjacent to the curb and sidewalk was dense when we probed it with a steelsoil probe. We reconumnded that the utility fro=h be excavated in several places upslope of the pavement failure lo locate the source of the seepage and itAcmept it before it reaches the low elevation area along 25th Place South. In addition, the peasant location of seepage could be draumd as an added measure. Basest on our oheer{rad=, we do not believe that the 1=1iud area of shallow subgrade disturbance is indicative of the general diaucter of the enmbaiail=rd fill. Golder Associates 08/28/97 THU 11:15 [T%/R% NO 5595] AUG-28.-97 THU 11 : 17 _ Po 05 '-33-Z7-ii7 : 16 � 4? GUL��lt A�sm I P' �� 7,F bf o August 27,1997 4 973-1122 • the tress sections (Figures 1 through 7) aid the Smap Plan ap in our jury I4,1997 report illustrate that fibs fangs for the proposed ha woo will be bearing in native subgrade or in new structural fill to be placed over the existing embankment. M. The new stnudural M1 wlll be cwnpacted to at jean# 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557. No foofiings will bear in the existing embazdcr wet fAl and in nearly all rms the f oo" will bear in newly placed Q at least five feet above the existing fill. We belkva that the native soils and the compacted strwftml fill placed over the native suits or existing fM wM provide adequate bearing capacity for the 11cruse f0Qd1W. ■ prior to the placement of the new M ovar the existingembankniLantfill the debris from the mud flour wilibe removed and the Frenrlidrain will be constructed. The new fill will be pled in aomparted 03 on 1lvricnntal benches. Each bench will be cut into or "keyed' into the existing fill slope and the bench subgrade aornpacted with a V%ratnry roller prior to plaament of the next layer of All. This win provide additional compmLedon for the upper surfao of the exlsftg embankmentfill. We trust trees eonnnents address the re%vant concerns raised in the review comments by Giles Eng�neerk% Associates.. It you have auy questions, please give us a call. Sincewly, GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. -P AM%--. G, jo tt Assoclate r Pslncip d o JG=Wrlw gww.b= Golder Associates 08/28/97 THU 11:15 [T%/R% NO 55951 AUG-28-97 THU 11:18 P.06 u;,�/26/U7 TUE 11:27 FAX 2D6Er_)129 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY i Q002 ��S/s? es -.18 . i2I LE5 _ Z I NEER I W + �]�5514129 Nfl. ?30 P00if 0�5 < y GILES ENG W 1< imma»F_ SSOGIATM, INC_ ^ _. ®wmcnN=A&, FmwamuKw" & Ca,46mucnaw Ia n•, CoNsuLT .aw,a wva, ra -"mom" "" August?S, 1997 ■vlawmQup,DA City of Fakral way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003-6210 Azt Lion: Mr. Stephan Clifton, Develapment Services Manager Subject: Claotscb4cal Rngiwedng Rview Heritage Woods, Tract H aAd I of'Divlslon 1, Lots 52 tvMough 58 Federal Way, Washk%toa Pmjmt No. 6G-9747d28 Dear?& Clifton: This letter presents the opinions and conclusions of Giles Engineering Associates, lor regutift geowbical engimaring considerations for development of the referenced residential lots. These conclusions were nacW based upon mview ofidornadan pravided by City staff at a meeting on Auger 6, 1991, a visit to the cite on A338ust 8, 1997, engineering andy-His, and our experience with similar 5ai6 and gcalagrc wnditions. Authorization For these srrvim W25 gxovi.ded ley you verbally, and in our Professional SwAcaa Agmement dated Aug= 6, 1997. The purpose of these serviws was limited to an evaluation of esnlnvoric and i'aundation ' coamzton proposed by the developer of the re&xeaced pro]wt sir regarding stability, erosion, wd foundatim support This letter is nit ia�! of service and the coacluslons presented herein have been promulgated is airdam whit ge =Ie y wcepted pmfessional =ginoering prazd= in the $old ofgcmt hWcal engineering. No other wa rwty is eithet enx&med or implied. This loner has been praparei far the cxclusivs use of the City of Federal Way, fbr speaf c application w rive slated purpose and sim STIR AND PROBCT DESCRIPTION The a%bjaet property is located on the east We of the intersection of South 2BOth Streer and 25th Place South in Fadand Way, Washington. The proposed residential lots which are the subject ofthis radew, deg aced lom 52 through 58, are in the northeastern pardon ofthe Heftge Woods residential development. The lots are 8,400 square fee mrh, with varyina ftontage on the west side of South 290th Street and 2Sth Place South The Waft plan for thz protect, by Jaeger FnBinieeriag and dated December 1994, was referenced for the lot grades and boundawies. The relirenced Ions are located on the wmtem sloped of a roadway embanitmtst, which appeaurs to have been cronanucted by #;!ling to depths of up to 2(r faer, on an wing west-fhcing natisro slope, The final fill sWpce were reportedly construetcd at angles of up to i ,51t, IV (Hariacntal:Vaticai), although the ref6reneed grading plan indicated a deign slope angle of2M, IV 06/26/67 TM 08137 ETEM NO 05681 08/28/97 THU 11:15 [TI/RI NO 55951 AUG-28-97 THU 11:19 P. 07 V6/,2U/97 TUB 11:28 RAC 206i -"1129 CITY OF FEDER&L WAY Fj1003 ee,e 9' - e9: 01 ra I t.ES A i wF-R rm + 2866614125 NC. TSd r� I LES CNGwrzrxRwQ Maivoo,%me, w4c. City of Federal Way Prcjc= No. 6G-9707029 Au"t 25, 1997 Page 2 or Satter. The slope apparently failed during tbo winter of 1996IS7, by j=Mpinstnowing in the vicinity of Loi a S31a4, and by tttirtar 4UMPing sad dM10F W Of t JdCa cracks tbraugbout the area of lots S3 and 56. Debris ate mad from the fatil= flowed of the jropeM litre oflots 53 and 54 taro a designated Na&n orawth Protection F.seme¢rt. , The site conditions weir evaluated by Golder Associates, Ew. following the slope tbiltue9, tbr the assumed purpose of providing options for lot grading and construction, Crolder Associates providrd two gcoterbxfi" reports which we= supplied to uw by the ChY for mew. TbM tepCM w= dated June 23 and July 14, 1997. The lane 23 report mdudes itdaimton reprding sail and gm=dwnter rariitiottz�, WeWding to loV of six tc& pits excavated on June 15, 1997, The fuly 14y rupvrt contains a summary of grading alternatives for kma 52 and 58, which were bwed an configuration of the lots such as setbacks, al,apas, and grades provided by Schmider Horses. In ante cooddons observed during UK of suaface *attires on the sun do not Wft team those d=n'hed In the �d Golder Amreport The seepage locadans wd quantities rt pormd by Gelder aasaeiatea appear to !lave dried up, most likely indicating that the seepage is vWavd to seasonal precipitariaa. CONCLUSIONS The doeurneats indicate tbat thm are irM!r-related piatming, conswacttfln Md antgipo erring issues wairich must be ceaeidarad in dwekTing a SruMg plan for these iota. Tice fnUoudng summ y de =Am our understanding of dwe ins mod correspcizAng csonclusion% If other 00116w4iuts exist ofwMeh we are unaware, we should be comIted fat possible readificimom of our conclusiaua and recaramaszdatioas_ Golder Associates has chsracterizad the 25th Place South embankmoew as helm$ =mptised cf c mpaeted in da lived fmm on4te sauna. The compaction of the tall is undocumented, auept for titree testing episodem during !tame 1996 which pavers taken at "wba}ade" elerwaton at curb, gotta apd sidewalk lecatiow. Although theme tests indicated adequate compaction, the compaction ksvela and soil chars 19d5dcs within the $II embenkmimt are urt uwWtL It is relevant to note that May 1996, when it is premaled that the majority of the till was placed, was w.t, with exten&a rdmW througbout fhe month. Additionally, wo were informed by Public Wc*z staff that subgmde soils mpand during pavemcm p&EcNng on 25th Place Sonde were in a 'jetlla-like' eonsratemy. It is avr opinion that the alapa failure, lack of compaction tmtin& w=bcr coudkims during she a=wxd tirm ogfilling. direct observaUcins of City stiff and conditions noted by Odder Associates all h4cate Zhu there 13 a substantial risk that the embankment is comprised of to ugly compacted 61L Unless the Strength and consolidation properties of the fIli are detenrained, we cars only conclude ihas thw embank o t sm` r, pret=1 a ionglerm stability and xttl=M9 risk. 08/20/97 TUB 08:67 ITs/RX NO 03081 08/28/97 TIT 11:15 [TX/RX NO 55951 AUG-28-97 THU 11:21 P.08 OjF/,;;6/97 TOE 11: 29 FAX- 206r ' 129 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Q 004 ose209:01 GIL-ES .3Yl EKING -3 2P68614129 NO.'730 Fea3-ems GILES CNaiNFARING fl - MMe. INC_ City ofvviw l Way p rojoct No . 60-970 702 9 Anjpw 25, 1997 page 3 Golder Assotatrnm nosed that buried topaajl eric=ttersd in the teat pits was intmWesc d to indiem absetst or inwMplew stripping, no cvidere of bcncbiag of the slope was obswAni The prewme of an uaMipged topsail scene. unknown coudidas within the fill, and [nck of benching, iatroduzcs a ride of instability and long -tam seelemesu orthe mmbaakn=l; end Impra` anesdo or fills oorrmcted atop the eWI*ng Mi. Wa do not concur with Goldies irr><glied canclusion in the Jme 23 repoNc zb= mzw fills which are allowed to settle for two wunka prior to f mdation saWttvction over this canrlitiou will resrsit in adequate ffou>uafJon support fba resu1c01 sti consavcdon. Thu site grading alternaxivw prosaotad in the Galdcr July 14 matt indleM that rea.Wng walls of major height 01 to 17 tit on lots 54 and 57) will be requital la order to avoid filling enst of the property fines with the given house and Iot configurations. Her =0 the I=d immediately eut of *a propeny first is already disnabad due to proviaus grading W cansu .action, we understand that the Cur may opt onaUy demamnu as dh�wabb filling limit east of tha prapertY lira. In. morsah of that vicinity, a canidor of az leant 12 feat width is disturbed. Additionally. the dcvtloper may optionally consider a redued ftont yard setback and hawse fovtpdnt depth in v=der to raduaft WI heigbMs ar The l MP&-ty W10• In gam. exteasion aftbe fill limit east of the property live will improve stability of the eompletcd ML by incresifmg the butwess of the existing, gwstionrable fill. Based ou the Goldcr crass -&lotions oftba grading aiternativea it appcArs 5ean-b1c to provi.dc a stable enginnfcd fill within a "13essc11ed 5E Wall' alremativc, passt'bly modified as described above to raduee wall h6wh1s. The sloped fill alternatives prcwnmd by Golder could also provide a stable con89orad6rr if designed with some additional cisarwActiastioa of odstsng M. The sloped fail alternatives, how+aWat, prcm;nt a greater long-term emaian hazard, nod a lwger &taunt of disturbance of adjacent native growth pratecdon areas, than tha �Dcnc ►ed M5E Wall" alterrgama. The existing, fawhich vAU remain b0neath new $Ils wabin the Footprint and 'bearing splay" of houses introduces a risk of toeg-term settlemmu. Lz o►ir opinion, the available 'sa£armation vegw&ng the e-odaing fill inarea a signiticaW risk would mist that homes built over, or influcaccd by, the existing fill could settle in the MSG of inches. if information is not provided which produces greater confidence In the support characteristics ofthe existing M, u d ottld be asumud. that arty improvements easnstmcted over it woul i be subject to Ion&.term saulonant& The axiaiing roadway embankmaur may consolidate or subside over the letterten, Pam 'bly disrupting udlWas, Due to the get donable, and presumed pow based an the 88/28/97 TOE 05:91 MAX NO 83961 08/28/97 THU 11:15 [TX/RX NO 55951 AUG-28-97 THU 11:22 P.09 6;/tit/Uv 11C08 I1:31 FAX 9086' 120 CITY OF FEDMUL WAY 0005 eae2szw 05: BZ G I DES — .u' I N= ING 4 2866614129 N0.730 F°Q@Af 005 GILES EMINEERIN61 RwocIATES. me. City of Fed" Wily Project No. 6G-9707029 Aupst 23, 1991; Pogo 4 information, available, lion efthe roubway % settlement in tbo range of inches should be considered passib14. This magnitude of long-term 5ettlemact csa cw= bcrewed rnaintamce and repair casts rar pavemeat~ AdMalirs, and anrbs_ This =28*r.tudja of sertie=eat can also cause lejgkage of uul'�s with smaciamd risk of daemp to the murvwWiPg improvements. Both. City and Lakshaven UtWty DsBtriat pipelines appear to be at risk Of amid=rsrt-stated dart P. Golder Aaeociatm rids that a seder of =bmVf=c interceptor drains be insEalied on the Ice of the editing fill ambsaltmeM in, order to drain 5pr1W Wd saMeM It is riot dear whether al a1mf a design Bch as as interceptor drain upsdom er a blanket drain within the final 0 eMb4pkmeM were omsidered_ 11m sawme of the groundwater was not evaluated on the west side of 25th Place South. Wo concur with the P=nmendumn the groundwater be inM=ptv4 the dasQW design of tine interceptor drain requires addidomai site inforumdon regarding the gra3n1hWrates sourm as mall as coordination with detailed design of the lot grading design. BECDMmEwf7ATIONS Our recommmdatiow are based on tlta xvadable Wf=nWd0 n;' if addidansi udbrmaticn is provided, tbese recommendations may require modification. we recommend the fallowing: 3. Lot grading in tine WS%3W arm should he dorm to both ptmWe a %der of safer equal to 1.5 or more fbr s bility of the completed fill, Lad to provide adeVate boaring rapacity and =tdmnma parformarm of the completed Louses. Addidanally, lot grading should iworpoww- drsImp imam to collect and divert submrface water and mltigam effects of this neater an both the roadway and lot fills. 2. Proposed machqds for mt itigaslon ofda consolidation or subsides risk affecting she roadway and utilities abadd be provided by dIe dev 19pce3 engineers. Evaluation of potential embaalomew u taam mt fmos will require additional gootedv&al field explaratiom sclt as borhzg% within the embenkment M. 3. 'lire Baal design ofthe lot gmd!nS should be based on, analysis of stability, to provide a Wtor of safety equaling 1.9 or greater. Characterization of wdsting fill, scab as contplotion of bonugs in she tmbanianeA is recommended for this mAysis. 4. Groundwa w cctWdons should be established, so that an intercptor drain an am wart side of the roadway or other dra3nsge alternates. can be raviewcd. 'lids may require idditiond field crpkxw!oq such as borings or test pits, +vest of On roadway. 08/2212? TUE 09:67 [TXM IW 55691 08/28/97 THU 11.15 [T%/R% NO 55951 AUG-28-97 THU 11:23 P. 10 L„/ spur TJE 11:32 FAX 20661^'t29 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Q006 id85/i 03:02 GILES ..i21'iEFRING a 2B65614129 NO.'ti9 PM51IM5 G I LES CNIM MIRING i lSSMWES, NO - City of Federal Way Project No. 60-9707029 Angus 25, 1997 Page S 5. Due to the tact of Watef on the slides wWch omrrrA at this site, and bated on typical weather Qatta u% the developer shWd ba required to provide interim stahi[intion and ernsian protection of the affected arca prior to October 15, 1997. The da ftn for let grading should include all erosion aomrol meawm% and grading criteria, typically required fgr wet weather constructian. These criteria may be dependent an floc moisture sensitivity of the fill sanrce. 6. in summary, tm sTablliiy, drainage: and subsidence imes for those proposed lots can only be adequately addressed. is oat ag#nlaa. by CIWR xetizinS the adsliug 1M1 emhwj=ant. We strongly recommend that at teast two borinp be completed along the east curb line of the 25th Place South fill. Thmaa borinV should be a xtt aded dxmmh tho M irtro no&c sods. OraLma ester sources below or west of the Madway should also be cvsluated, goasibly in corjun=ion ,with this drilling_ The scope and sampkng plan for the borings should be astabtished'by The deveiopees engidWS; ere are jvgilahle to review tbm speeiilc proposed bating plan prior to drilling. 7. Due to rive unimowa condhioas within the 911, we racoma=d That the City establish a baseline sunray of hariamMl and vertical Posit M of the curb slang 25th Place South_ A periodic survey should then be complcuu, to evaluum potemid lateral Or 'vertical ddisptacemm. This WMdd be espeeislly critical if the lot grading i,a mt completed prior to October is, 1997_ We appracwe this oppottwsitg to provide thsse services. Please co if you have any questions or sasd addWonal lnformaticn. We are avaflable to rcO'tm ndditional submitmb mcdved cn tlse matters, or to meet with City staff to d"rsouss these matters at Your request" oG: Mr. Cary Barnett, P.E. Senior Mvelopment. Enshwer City ofFedend Way R=4xtt%Py snbmitzcd, GMES M400 rEWNG ASSOCIATES, INC. John E. Zipper, P-E- Renal Manager 08/20/07 TIM 08:87 MAM NO 63683 08/28/97 THU 11:15 [TX/R% NO 55951 CITY OF 33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH August 26, 1997 Mr. David Morrison parklane Ventures 31620 - 23rd Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 R�FILE' ( @0 7 FEDERAL 3�210 Re: HERITAGE WOODS, Modification to Preliminary Plat Condition # 6 & 7, Tracts H & J File Nos. SEP97--0001 & UPR97-0003 Dear Mr. Morrison: I have reviewed the second Golder Associates report titled Proposed Site Grading Alternatives Heritage Woods Tracts H and J, dated July 14, 1997, regarding the proposed site grading alternatives for Tracts H and J of Heritage Woods Division 11. The July 14, 1997, Golder report provides a preliminary analysis of geo-technical alternatives for filling and grading the future lots within Tracts H and J (lots 52 - 59) and provides background information for your Process Y application and SEPA review to modify the Heritage Woods preliminary Plat conditions #6 and #7 under the permit numbers referenced above. Your July 15, 1997, cover letter indicates your request for approval of Golder alternative #2, discussed below. This correspondence supplements the August 25, �a esse�thesloughing along 25th Place ngineering review of both South, lder reports. The first Golder report (Tune 23, 199 ) and the second Golder report (July 14, 1997) addresses e� alternative fill proposals for Tracts H issues outlined in this correspondence and and J. I trust you will coordinate with your engineer the issues raised by the Giles Engineering review. Both Golder alternatives 41 and 42 display fill sections extending past the back of the property lines of Tracts H and J into the Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) and into the 100 foot wetland setback area (Gehind lots 57 and 58). In summary, alternative #1 provides a 20 foot long - 10% grade driveway, 46 foot deep building pad, 20 foot flat backyard, 3:1 slope down to rear property line, and 3.1 fill slope extending 60 - 70 feet beyond the rear property line into the NGPE beyond the rear line of future lots 52 - 58, and into the 100 foot wetland setback area. Alternative #2 is the same as alterative 91 butextends saflt�e fill Alternative #2 also includes fill rear of future lots 52 - 58 by increasing the steepness extending into the 100 foot wetland setback area. 0 David Morrison August 26, 1997 Page 2 The July 14, 1997, Golder report also provides alternative fill sections for lots 57 and 58 to keep fill out of the wetland D setback area. However, this alternative also includes overfilling and cutting back, which would essentially result in construction impacts on the wetland setback area. I requested a vegetation survey for the areas proposed to be impacted by fill in my March 21, 1997, letter to you. In response to the vegetation survey request, you submitted two reports by Roger delMoral dated August 8 and August 15, 1997. I concur with Mr. delMoral's assessment that the vegetation on the future lots 52-57 is stressed, disturbed, damaged, and of low value. Much of the damage and stress is due to construction of the subdivision infrastructure. As the proposed fill sections extend beyond the rear of Tracts H and J into the(NGPE, I also asked for a vegetation survey within the NGPE area that is proposed to be filled. In reference to NGPE area behind lots 52 and 53, the August 15, 1997, delMoral report (first paragraph of page 2) indicates, "...there are some relatively healthy maples. These maples could be left by minor alteration of the fill footprint. There are some elements of vegetation that may have some value esthetic or other value." The August 8, 1997 delMoral report (first paragraph page 3) indicates, "Lot 58 contains more healthy and more mature trees, some of which are in the buffer to Wetland D. —Appropriate landscaping could replace them quantitatively, but there would be a qualitative loss." The intent of this correspondence is to indicate what type of fill and grade proposal planning staff will support in order to modify preliminary plat conditions 96 and #7 based on the information provided to date. Attached is a color highlighted copy of the planimetric map provided in the July 14, 1997, Golder report. The pink color indicates fill alternative #1, and the orange color indicates alternative #2. RECONMMNDATION Staff supports filling on lots 52-58, and filling some limited areas in the NGPE beyond the rear of the lots. In order to reduce and/or minimize impacts to the existing vegetation behind lots 52, 53, 57, 58, and the wetland buffer, we recommend preserving the vegetation in the-NGPE behind lots 52, 53, 57, and 58 by filling only inside (streetward) of the blue line drawn on the attached drawing (marked August 26, 1997, in top right comer). Implementation of a combination of the following suggestions provides viable alternatives to fill alternatives 91 and 92 proposed by Golder Associates. • Reduce the depth of the building envelopes for the residences from 46 feet to approximately 34 feet. For comparison purposes, Schneider Home's basic plan No. BLD97-1002 on file with the city is for a 34 foot deep house. David Morrison August 26, 1997 Page 3 * Possibly increase the driveway grade up to 15 percent. • Use a combination of structurally engineered tiered walls and fill sections. 0 Implement 2:1 fill slopes under engineers recommendations to decrease fill areas. • Revegetate disturbed/filled areas following recommendations by delMoral and civil engineer as recommended in delMoral August 15, 1997, report. A full landscapeJrevegetation plan is required approval of the grading proposal. Of course the conclusion above and the recommended implementation alternatives must be designed by a licensed engineer, b , carefully coordinated with the plans for shoring 25th Place, and factor in the structural requirements for future building permits on lots 52 - 58. City review and approval of the engineering plans is required. To further your application to modify preliminary plat conditions #6 and #7, I am advising you to revise the cross section and plan view maps to follow the recommendations outlined above. Also, provide a revised SEPA checklist and landscape plan to correspond to any revised fill and grade plan. As mentioned in my March 21, 1997 letter, revised plans must clearly indicate clearing limits, construction equipment limits, and construction access routes because construction impacts will likely exceed the fill area. I would be glad to comment on a draft of your revised plan. Additionally, please review my March 21, 1997, letter and respond to all items identified as incomplete items, and respond to all items under the review comment section. To further the pending SEPA and Process review, please submit your engineering plans, reports, and drawings discussed above and requested in my March 21, 1997 letter. At this time the application is still considered incomplete pending submittal of the information requested in this letter and in my March 21, 1997 letter. I hope this information is helpful. Please contact me at 661-4019 if you or your consultant have any questions. Sincerely, -- Ti :�� Associate Planner enc c: Stephen Clifton, Public Works Development Services Manager Gary Barnett, Senior Development Engineer hwoodj\625971ixr 8/28/97 Mr. Jim Harris Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1 st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RECEIVED By COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AUG 2 9 1997 Re: Heritage Woods - Tracts H & J Grading Permit Dear Jim; PARKLANE ParkLane Executive Center 31620-23rd Avenue South #320 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Telephone: (206) 946-3652 Fax: (206) 946-3580 Per your letter of Mar. 21 /97, please find enclosed two (2) sets of addressed, stamped envelopes (with City of Federal Way return address) for all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the perimeter of the entire subdivision. Also enclosed is the assessor's map showing all properties within 300 feet of the Heritage Woods boundary, and a list of all owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site. Si Merely, , David We are committed to quality, valve and service to fit a c dreams and exceed flreir expectation, bUA1RBDROUGFf _I VX ar«7.46 � , -;-w • NW 33 - 157561 H n 3� .74 � ;,ro, - + � � r �` " .' r• Y'�r^ far, •.':.: i • m - m �� eS c �nfs" � �p7 4LQ Pax i a S n • , r C� • ,� P wrt r 'y, �' A� 3 iyr ZR u e �� ''� ��' N C 7a n v alb m `�� ryy'a ! ti€Ds t3•y +• to �-`hyrqq�y �� y `\ � �f�7 ��m 44 y''� 1p a y�W�r •i r`F � �... aVIA � �rq ti � � ,are�s+r � a.r"�+•:� - -- ...c+ � �ANfly6ApE aG SR 5 SO AREA rnn DIZN ifRS � In U't O r a L . m ua $ NW 34-22-4 9 r�8 /4 •``] 1 Q y a y4i f0 !i rd ! � o :J rn 9V ,,� Q om �9• �i g oy� ra l9 ��� ��v�avd '�*. a o sr' C 4 �t�'�� � -�'� to •�iti � � j*�� N �4r� �{%J 9�}ti. . � � m.0o p v O l p 0 a o V 1 pp m o 0 0 ,s� 9r..a � �le� � } � ti •�0l.9 � °3 00 N �s� Cb cn d 2�'a � , �9 ► 7��' Op � � c� No A ��1 45' 4p AT � a � 1 � 9� r �''� �I, c�• 8 � �:7P, cA � � Ti a ��p [� y 4747Ez aq. 77e y nV �' A�DIyfL• !i E v ar n (1k n a' 1� to q C*r by b3/E a� r� p9ros m A J3.r ���' V V to �' 0 �' ;04� p0 h W rs sa.Te 1-4 •g Zq.. r 2� o N pl g �► `� � - —� "°y ,�, �� a� y � � � e�� .�' .�� � n by �.� C 24 �• 2 o fl � �+ � Cj� � � I s S. o c N CD wAa m w W o N fpr v� D �4 Z� N Nc tv ,yh Cn yea s7'r. `•o �. a nc�� iqa a �l zacoo° a grDd w Nr-ac xe "d c• s 4 e W �8 z, P E 3 cn A"' 'tr +� tb 4 g K$$ CJl i/ a�4CI�yu yyd+•r'¢� a y� R} c�i 4q ti Lb (A "� s �o �� �U * y ��tti sx c p5 � � ,4 ¢y�� cw l`Z F r$ae 5 N p a v Cl {�� rd� -1.? �+' � �� A ip7 c� 4' Q: � �,z n o'-'�j,� o •a �a v` 'mac. 3s ri 0 �a boy gr� wo rapt 1 2. m ao s3 g.8b28s�CD 'Ck `IA C �y�� [p m 9o,F5 7► LA s c , 0) n ' P �n � a.s2 r r G •Ls� w NJ'13.2CWIgo� i ^'830E u o- CA 2 g4 g0� 'S` QG L o [sGf a�� { �oO,Ltj ';'•s3 _5 �� �$ NWpoN h �q .90 mo CA s grOD a �A yye� Cal yip • v .s � � SA9s^ �'. N � A 4a �Z1 ca .--aA � ql .sb .a ❑ �^ ��Sp Day N p, � gS •y ��,❑ Ey � •a . s u` u+ 04::c8. A see NE 3 -22 xcsrror6assR-rer�l8royr `33 — ;2 2 — 4 �1316$36� ♦e� � O� S-40E -- 131636 ---- '� I V � �F LOCATION OLD MIT-(TARY Ra. Q IID� I a ©� Ig} 0 `" , MS Vo I ^=k d •� .� 8 � � Y CIoN �' m # � y • C � _ a n P � 1 � � e y N • � p'`1I[ N N y� pf F W - N o -m , � • g0 N r w � IrlT7� �S V L. �� 3� $ �, � ie i �o vg .� Jr _ a..r. ♦ � � N � 27 - -- - � � 1 C H L * N t 'If b �n -- Ztl _ � • + +� 4 � O � � �y.l u Y m 1 a L r On I'm H o.a i a ti.x � V N 4, ra p4 W N rt`s e �•r Z - � 8e, ^ aa Cp i Ge S NA cv L ffeS AVE 5 28TH z141 0 .� i 6 c� oi, �" � •L� g bi �4 �`b�; o 'm• t r�',, u•l1 y o 6 reyN ice' tiiyf a m �'isX O gas i s �a1e � 3 y • � d kn ,�� °, r ._`_ a .t►f�NCS ,<{ JJ OS b ` 5 � Sb Gpc � y�5 .y yr5 F .a..r a ��•' r r.ex = � � 31d ls2l31N� e A�,,,drj0" p•aFc1 � ON N i �I319.B9 Z— •����TII -O -35E � 9 W 34 — 22 — 4 1 31 9.99 N O t a i rN aVE s , _ - 5 • � Z � � �y ` t��`� ��'t9C•� }�ly6s� •� �� ;�1k � o`E$ ^�':� I®S� ®4a ®�� Q;$ � ,. STATE RD. NO.I - PAC. HWY. S. STATE RQ ND,I-PAC-HWY. S. � _---__ _----- o- O� � ; ,wr o-�. fso.zx xa7 t..wns .re.c ora, a �� & � . r,tq +•.� .- ����= •�.. � F i d •!li � aa t ° f 1 ®rip - ����}yi•8 lBrFE. AVE. S. } a .e. ••••• •R y I x C • � o ~ ru t o 3}} < c # m ! � aaa "` `...ter. •" , , > _ � ul 0 � W r • � � ,• 'r' • ,ram •iy pR y�� f -a `''� $ q o 132La 4. rY • �. w H x i •sk •� �* .gy .� .�$ C stmE.} �S� e4fi !• [[:f { R k z;0.5 207k. AVE;, A a� Eh��a� �� •5y� i� t@R RN�1��y ><pe�i•�M1 i• I�eA t 'i�0 i�w � ne � tiC W° "N E ^m � .� �i� ;� i i r Q � !a tH� �:,�Q '�t�T'!i _ x.� �~r atr !�� ►a �� :�.�+ �" �'. 0a� f;t E$.�%,� s� � •• ��� •; � •�rw t Z �k ��� aim �i`` rZ' � ..isi � Lr •rp �ti �3� 1 I r.avt.s. r., 4 a ;'R 7{ 'r e�`p1• 3 �y� .,. �t r�:R �G p __ i�h } r_ �,. i 14 F o a. I' _ �,. a•r ry i^' ��d� _- h 7.... � s �i i I �E � f• p � R rid _ $S .�� 3M a , �«. � i ! ' � h 4� 3 r Yam'- • �a3 .. e n , 4-tj 1n4 'p d•yry h _ .' E'" it w }�a h. 3�•E '..„>¢ `� "V a 0 N�R�]ye r r n r tw�a� . � zx t � � �" a�' � k . � �" � ^+ ,. • � v _;.� � ((�� y,� o � � �y to i C. � �•� � a rY = �''' � B ..� . s,, r,•' '�• � 4 � "r '7 eaa 1 t�:a ,� ..r� oco .��4 �,{a °ry ;ik fg�, `sik ;� i{ �� aa: ^}e ��`^ � } •a ita b �SSyy R y r era � i•? � f�t+� r i9�' �+�6 .{ n a!� a{a 9' n� i q Z 193RM AY E. S � _'...,... • '�� �.-'- pro r N .... a r z4ntwYE.i ru a u.y 6 pr -p POR HCSPA076033R-TB12121097 N'' E�, 131610 5 E.3'-- 22- 4 JT�YO33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH August 26, 1997 Mr. David Morrison Parklane Ventures 31620 - 23rd Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 FED. FEDERAL $03-6210 Re: HERITAGE WOODS, Modification to Preliminary Plat Condition # 6 & 7, Tracts H & J File Nos SEP97-000I & UPR97-0003 Dear Mr. Morrison: I have reviewed the second Golder Associates report titled Proposed Site Grading Alternatives Heritage Woods Tracts Hand J, dated July 14, 1997, regarding the proposed site grading alternatives for Tracts H and J of Heritage Woods Division II. The July 14, 1997, Golder report provides a preliminary analysis of geo-technical alternatives for filling and grading the future lots within Tracts H and J (lots 52 - 58) and provides background information for your Process I application and SEPA review to modify the Heritage Woods preliminary plat conditions #6 and #7 under the permit numbers referenced above. Your July 15, 1997, cover letter indicates your request for approval of Golder alternative #2, discussed below. This correspondence supplements the August 25, 1997, Giles Engineering review of both Golder reports. The first Golder report (June 23, 1997) addresses the sloughing along 25th Place South, and the second Golder report (July 14, 1997) addresses the alternative fill proposals for Tracts H and J. I trust you will coordinate with your engineer the issues outlined in this correspondence and the issues raised by the Giles Engineering review. Both Golder alternatives #1 and #2 display fill sections extending past the back of the property lines of Tracts H and J into the Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) and into the 100 foot wetland setback area (behind lots 57 and 58). In summary, alternative #T provides a 20 foot long - 10% grade driveway, 46 foot deep building pad, 20 foot flat back yard, 3 :1 slope down to rear property line, and 3:1 fill slope extending 60 - 70 feet beyond the rear property line into the NGPE beyond the rear line of future lots 52 - 58, and into the 100 foot wetland setback area. Alternative #2 is the same as alterative #1 but extends fill approximately 25 - 45 feet beyond the rear of future lots 52 - 58 by increasing the steepness of the fill. Alternative #2 also includes fill extending into the 100 foot wetland setback area. David Morrison August 26, 1997 Page 2 The July 14, 1997, Golder report also provides alternative fill sections for lots 57 and 58 to keep fill out of the wetland D setback area. However, this alternative also includes overfilling and cutting back, which would essentially result in construction impacts on the wetland setback area. I requested a vegetation survey for the areas proposed to be impacted by fill in my March 21, 1997, letter to you. In response to the vegetation survey request, you submitted two reports by Roger delMoral dated August 8 and August 15, 1997. I concur with Mr. delMoral's assessment that the vegetation on the future lots 52-57 is stressed, disturbed, damaged, and of low value. Much of the damage and stress is due to construction of the subdivision infrastructure. As the proposed fill sections extend beyond the rear of Tracts H and J into the(NGPE, I also asked for a vegetation survey within the NGPE area that is proposed to be filled. In reference to NGPE area behind lots 52 and 53, the August 15, 1997, delMoral report (first paragraph of page 2) indicates, "...there are some relatively healthy maples. These maples could be left by minor alteration of the fill footprint. There are some elements of vegetation that may have some value esthetic or other value." The August 8, 1997 delMoral report (first paragraph page 3) indicates, "Lot 58 contains more healthy and more mature trees, some of which are in the buffer to Wetland D.... Appropriate landscaping could replace them quantitatively, but there would be a qualitative loss." The intent of this correspondence is to indicate what type of fill and grade proposal planning staff will support in order to modify preliminary plat conditions #6 and #7 based on the information provided to date. Attached is a color highlighted copy of the planimetric map provided in the July 14, 1997, Golder report. The pink color indicates fill alternative #1, and the orange color indicates alternative #2. RECOAIAMNDATION Staff supports filling on lots 52-58, and filling some limited areas in the NGPE beyond the rear of the lots. In order to reduce and/or minimize impacts to the existing vegetation behind lots 52, 53, 57, 58, and the wetland buffer, we recommend preserving the vegetation in the-NGPE behind lots - 52, 53, 57, and 58 by filling only inside (streetward) of the blue line drawn on the attached drawing (marked August 26, 1997, in top right corner). Implementation of a combination of the following suggestions provides viable alternatives to fill alternatives #1 and 92 proposed by Golder Associates. • Reduce the depth of the building envelopes for the residences from 46 feet to approximately 34 feet. For comparison purposes, Schneider Home's basic plan No. BLD97-1002 on file with the city is for a 34 foot deep house. David Morrison August 26, 1997 Page 3 • Possibly increase the driveway grade up to 15 percent. • Use a combination of structurally engineered tiered walls and fill sections. • Implement 2:1 fill slopes under engineers recommendations to decrease fill areas. • Revegetate disturbed/filled areas following recommendations by delMoral and civil engineer as recommended in delMoral August 15, 1997, report. A full landscape/revegetation plan is required approval of the grading proposal. Of course the conclusion above and the recommended implementation alternatives must be designed by a licensed engineer, by carefully coordinated with the plans for shoring 25th Place, and factor in the structural requirements for future building permits on lots 52 - 58. City review and approval of the engineering plans is required. To further your application to modify preliminary plat conditions #6 and #7, I am advising you to revise the cross section and plan view maps to follow the recommendations outlined above. Also, provide a revised SEPA checklist and landscape plan to correspond to any revised fill and grade plan. As mentioned in my March 21, 1997 letter, revised plans must clearly indicate clearing limits, construction equipment limits, and construction access routes because construction impacts will likely exceed the fill area. I would be glad to comment on a draft of your revised plan. Additionally, please review my March 21, 1997, letter and respond to all items identified as incomplete items, and respond to all items under the review comment section. To further the pending SEPA and Process review, please submit your engineering plans, reports, and drawings discussed above and requested in my March 21, 1997 letter. At this time the application is still considered incomplete pending submittal of the information requested in this letter and in my March 21, 1997 letter. I hope this information is helpful. Please contact me at 661-4019 if you or your consultant have any questions. Sincerely, T arris Associate Planner enc c: Stephen Clifton, Public Works Development Services Manager Gary Barnett, Senior Development Engineer hwoods\625971ta 5 �r 45 5 dL 7 JAEGER ENGINEERING 9419 S. 204 PL Ko,", W a- 9803-1 r 014 Au5oS aco,1997 —== ul L > �CC1o�`h``z• ��E�G� Uj _ L S0_ o �- .. V 9 19 1 JAEGER ENGINEERING 9419 S. 204 PL Kent, Wa. 98031 1 1 } !11 1�1 ;1 [ �- , _ ter. 1 - - ur 1 ��_�� '`' -_ . � '; _�� _. -�. � •. �-�,` �` -=- _;.,. - � } ^` - i'--` _+ �� �r~ } �-• f_f � } �� �� l i 1 � . _ � _ �_,-_'r��� 1=•-tee �•� '�Y �J` _�� r �� _f �[ � � 1_ __ •'17!���] �+1. �� •� �1'�i .r-^._J, t f_�i�. � - __ /� j� � _ _,_ _- _ _-i r r f r-7l�1�1 _��,7I'� •� -- — ` C._ 1q r f �l _-�-r✓� g� 't : r f • f - s�='[�'!!�'}i �r t� ll -'C{'`- kk IN IN �. ,� f �" •: `' _. i —AK— i 1 �.. �r ",� �*'ti; \` :*�s�r�til � _ter• 1 V ............... L LO"l 52 SITE PLAN - AUG-19-97 TUE 14:38 P.01 8119/97 Post -it" Fax Note 7671 Date gy pag 510. Z To%&e From 6Y,; 1%0ZAt1JW Co.//DePr•,r_!,;IX Ord / 4 f.."4Y Co. A..L"_l x Phone Phone A Fax Fax Mr. Cary Roe Director - Public Works City of Federal Way 335301 st Way So. Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Heritage Woods - Tracts H & J Slope Stabilization Dear Cary; PARKLANE ParkLane Executive Center 31620-23rd Avenue South #320 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Telephone: (206) 946-3652 Fax: (206) 946-3580 When the slope failed within Tracts H & J of Heritage Woods this spring, the City required that Parkiane retain a geo-technical engineer to advise what needed to be done to stabilize the slope. We retained the services of Golder and Associates, a well respected Goo -Technical Engineering firm. On July 17/97, we submitted the Golder Report with recommendations on how to stabilize the slope. The City, upon receipt of the report, advised that it would take the City 30 days to review the report. On July 29th, we agreed to an "Expeditious Review"of the Golder Report, wherein the City would hire and Parklane would pay for an independent geo-technical consultant to review the Golder Report, and within ten days provide us their recommendations. To date, we have not received a copy of the City's independent consultant's report. We are declaring an.emergency to the slope conditions, and are holding the City fully responsible for any future damage that occurs to the fill section within S. 23rd Ave. and Tracts H & J. The repairs must be made in dry weather. We cannot accept the responsibility for further damage caused by City delays. We have men and equipment and fill material standing by to complete.the stabilization of the slope, based on Golder and Associates recommendations. I have been advised by Golder and Associates that their recommendations are not esoteric, but very standard for the industry, based on the existing site conditions. Please advise me of the City's schedule for providing us approval to commence stabilization of the slope within Tracts H & J, which supports S. 23rd Ave. Sincerely, 4MA"wo; David W. Morrison We are cwrrntitted to quality, valve and service _ �.. 08/19/97 TUE 14:41 [TX/RX N0 54921 RUG-19-97 TUE 14:39 E 2 cc: Ivan Christianson - Kohl Excavating Jerry McCann - Continental Dirt Jerry Schneider - Schneider Homes, Inc. Dennis Alfredson - Schneider Homes, Inc. Jim Jaeger - Jaeger Eng. Gino Nonni - Parklane Ventures, Inc. Stephen Clifton - City of Federal Way Greg FeWns - City of Fed. Way Gary Barnett - City of Fed. Way 08/19/97 TUE 14:41 [T%/R% NO 54921 AUG-19-97 TUE 10:10 P. 01 8/19/97 PARKLAN E Parl<l..ane Executive Center 31620-23rd Avenue South 4320 Federal Way. Wa6hington 9MM Mr. Jim Harris -Via Fax/661-4129 - 3oy s Telephone: (206) 9463652 Associate Planner Fax: (206)94&3,5R0 City of Federal Way 33530 1 st Way So. Federal Way, WA 98003 Re; Heritage Woods Tracts H & J - Grading Permit Existing Trees & Veg. Adjacent Preliminary Lots 52-53 Dear Jim; Upon review of Roger Del Moral's study and evaluation of the size and type of trees and vegetation within and adjacent to preliminary Lots 52-58, you requested a more intense study behind Lots 52 and 53. commissioned Roger Del Moral to re -visit the site and carefully detail and evaluate the existing trees and vegetation behind Lots 52 and 53, where we propose to extend the fill section beyond Lots 52 and 53. Attached is Roger's report. I will provide you a Landscape Plan showing how, as part of our Grading Permit, we will mitigate the loss of the existing trees and vegetation, within the fill sections of Lots 52-58, and the Open Space Tracts and Wetland Buffer. Please provide me your comments and recommendations at your earliest convenience so that we may incorporate them within our Landscape Plan to be submitted as part of our Grading Permit. Sincerely, /aW&44041;-1 David W. Morrison cc: Greg Fewins - City of Fed. Way Gary Barnett - City of Fed. Way Jim Jaeger - Jaeger Eng. Harry Schneider - Schneider Home, Inc. Dennis Alfredson - Schneider Homes, Inc. Gino Nonni - Parklane Ventures. Inc. We are committed to quality, value and service .. L.ICII ...._ _.. na.. • JwdL [TX/RX NO 54791 08/19/97 TUE 10:13 AUG-19-97 TUE 10:11 - w� Y P. 02 ael Moral & dissociates � 2002-42nd Ave. East Seattle, WA 98112 (206) 323-7106 FAX (206) 328-9050 August 15, 1997 RE: Heritage Woods, Lots 52 - 53 (Old designations) Mr. David Morrison ParkLane Ventures 31620 - 23=d Ave. S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Dear Mr. Morrison_ At your request, I returned to inspect the vegetation located on Lots 52 and 53 of the Heritage Woods Project. Please refer to my memo of August 8, 1997, for com- ments on lots 54 to 59. Lots 52 and 53 contain some steep slopes (over 40%), but are not within a buffer zone. The vegetation of these two lots is of low biological significance. Here is a summary of why I reached this conclusion. 1. Past disturbance has opened up the vegetations to invasion of exotic species, some of which are common. These species include black raspberry (.Rubus leucodermis), fireweed (lowland form of Epilobium angusiifolium), a variety of grasses, and some English holly (Ilex aquifolium). Some of these native species are also invasive. These species include bracken fern. 2. The trees on these lots have been damaged and manly show signs of extreme stress. For example, I noted that the three alders on or near the site have broken limbs and were -rated as*being "senescent", meaning that they are in severe decline and may die. There is also an alder that is nearly dead and cannot be expected to survive more than one or two years. The maples all have broken stems or tops, or are leaning severely. Adjacent to Lot 52 there is a small, broken hemlock. 3. The red alders, in addition to being under stress from exposure, may have reached their natural life -span, and may die regardless of any action on these lots. 4. Features such as stumps with red huckleberry growing from them are exceed- ingly common, found in virtually all second growth forests in this area. They increase visual interest, but add little to the ecological functioning of the system. 08/19/97 TUE 10:13 [T%/R% NO 54791 V. uZ5 AUG-19-97 TUE 10 : 12 Near the toe of the proposed fall slope, there are some relatively healthy maples. These maples could be left by minor alteration of the fill footprint. There are some elements of vegetation that may have some value esthetic or other value. It would be possible to mitigate the effects of filling by a suitable native landscape plan for the open space portions of this area. Any value lost by removing the senescent alders and maples would be compensated by planting larger (ca. 4 inches) caliper conifers in the ratio of 3 planted conifers per removed tree. In addition, tall shrubs such as red elderberry and red huckleberry could be planted to fill, in the understory and mimic aspects of emsting vegetation. The ground layer could be planted with low Oregon grape and sword fern. It is likely that red alder or black cottonwood will naturally invade. Since the fill. will require erosion control, I recommend that you use biodegradable net material and plant through it. rather than hydroseed. The hydroseeding will create a difficult competitive situation for the woody plants. Alternatively, you could incorporate a pre emergent herbicide in the top 3 inches IS inches around each planted individual to reduce weed growth. Building houses on stilts on these east -facing lots, in order to preserve the vegeta- tion, does not appear to be -a good idea. Presumably, the idea is to preserve tall plants outside the footprint by avoiding a fill. However, because these trees are, for the most part either senescent or within any logical foot print, at best you only create a situation where trees are very likely to fall on a structuxe. Further, this would appear to create lots with little useable land. The activities of the residents Will aot be beneficial to these stressed plants, and will encourage the invasion of aggressive weeds. And obviously, few if any plants will grow under the houses. l can see no biological reason for preserving; the existing vegetation_ Any loss of value can be mitigated without assuming potential liabilities for damage from falling trees. Erosion from the 2:1 slope can be controlled more readily by a combi- nation of engineering and biological actions. I hope these remarks clarify earlier my comments. Sincerely, or Dr_ Roger del Moral Owner 2 08/19/97 TUE 10:13 [T%/R% NO 54791 AUG-19-97 TUE 10:10 P. 01 8/19/97 PARKLANE ParkLane Executive Center 31620-23rd Avenue South 4320 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Mr. Jim Harris - Via Fax/661-4129 - 3 S Telephone: (206) 946-3652 � Fax: tzars) 94c}35aa Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1 st Way So. Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Heritage Woods Tracts H & J - Grading Permit Existing Trees & Veg. Adjacent Preliminary Lots 52-53 Dear Jim; Upon review of Roger Del Moral's study and evaluation of the size and type of trees and vegetation within and adjacent to preliminary Lots 52-58, you requested a more intense study behind Lots 52 and 53. commissioned Roger Del Moral to re -visit the site and carefully detail and evaluate the existing trees and vegetation behind Lots 52 and 53, where we propose to extend the fill section beyond Lots 52 and 53. Attached is Roger's report. I will provide you a Landscape Plan showing how, as part of our Grading Permit, we will mitigate the loss of the existing trees and vegetation, within the fill sections of Lots 52-58, and the Open Space Tracts and Wetland Buffer. Please provide me your comments and recommendations at your earliest convenience so that we may incorporate them within our Landscape Plan to be submitted as part of our Grading Permit. Sincerely, David W. Morrison cc: Greg Fewins - City of Fed. Way Gary Barnett - City of Fed. Way Jim Jaeger - Jaeger Eng. Harry Schneider - Schneider Home, Inc. Dennis Alfredson - Schneider Homes, Inc. Gino Nonni - Parklane Ventures. Inc. 08/19/97 TUE 10-13 We are Committed to quality, value and service [TX/RX NO 54791- AUG-19-97 TUE 10:11 P.02 ael Moral & Associates 2002-42nd Ave. East Seattle, WA 98112 (206) 323-7106 FAX (206) 328-9050 August 15, 1997 RE: Heritage Woods, Lots 52 - 53 (Old designations) Mr. David Morrison ParkLane Ventures 31620 - 23rd Ave. S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Dear Mr. Morrison: At your request, I returned to inspect the vegetation located on Lots 52 and 53 of the Heritage Woods Project. Please refer to my memo of August 8, 1997, for com- ments on lots 54 to 59. Lots 52 and 53 contain some steep slopes (over 40%), but are not within a buffer zone. The vegetation of these two lots is of low biological significance. Here is a summary of why I reached this conclusion. 1. Past disturbance has opened up the vegetation to invasion of exotic species, some of which are common. These species include black raspberry (Rubus leucodermis), fireweed (lowland form of Epilobium angustifolium), a variety of grasses, and some English holly (Ilex aquifolium). Some of these native species are also invasive. These species include bracken fern. 2. The trees on these lots have been damaged and many show signs of extreme stress. For example, I noted that the three alders on or near the site have broken limbs and were -rated as'being "senescent'', meaning that they fire in severe decline and may die. There is also an alder that is nearly dead and cannot be expected to survive more than one or two years. The maples all have broken stems or tops, or are leaning severely. Adjacent to Lot 52 there is a small, broken hemlock. 3. The red alders, in addition to being under stress from exposure, may have reached their natural life -span, and may die regardless of any action on these lots. 4. Features such as stumps with red huckleberry growing from them are exceed- ingly common, found in virtually all second growth forests in this area. They increase visual interest, but add little to the ecological functioning of the system. 08/19/97 TUE 10:13 [TX/RX NO 54791 r u.) AUG-19-97 TUE 10:12 Near the toe of the proposed fill slope, there are some relatively healthy maples. These maples could be left by minor alteration of the fill footprint. There are some elements of vegetation that may have some value esthetic or other value. It would be possible to mitigate the effects of 51 ing by a suitable native landscape plan for the open space portions of this area. Any value lost by removing the senescent alders and maples would be compensated by planting larger (ca. 4 inches) caliper conifers in the ratio of 3 planted conifers per removed tree. In addition, tall shrubs such as red elderberry and red huckleberry could be planted to fE2 in the understory and mimic aspects of existing vegetation. The ground layer could be planted with low Oregon grape and sword fern. It is likely that red alder or black cottonwood will naturally invade. Since the fill will require erosion control, I recommend that you use biodegradable net material and plant through it. rather than hydroseed. The hydroseeding wiji create a difficult competitive situation for the woody plants. Alternatively, you could incorporate a pre -emergent herbicide in the top 3 inches 18 inches around each planted individual to reduce weed growth. Building houses an stilts on these east -facing lots, in order to preserve the vegeta- tion, does not appear to be. a good idea. Presumably, the idea is to preserve tall plants outside the footprint by avoiding a EM. However, because these trees are, for the most part either senescent or within any logical foot print, at best you only create a situation where trees are very likely to fall on a structure. Further, this would appear to create lots with little useable land_ The activities of the residents will not be beneficial to these stressed plants, and will encourage the invasioa of a.ggzessive weeds. And obviously, few if any plants will grow under the houses_ I can see no biological reason for preserving the existing vegetation. Any loss of value can be mitigated without assuming potential liabilities for damage from falling trees. Erosion from the 2:1 slope can be controlled more readily by a combi- nation of engineering and biological actions. I hope these remarks clarify earlier my comments. Sincerely, 0 q�� G Dr. Roger del Moral Owner 2 08/19/97 TUE 10:13 [Tg/R% NO 54793 AUG-12-97 TUE 13:31 P,09 n R CF I F� ARTn�Ei� s COMMU del Moral & Associates AUG 12 1997 2002-42nd Ave. East Seattle, WA 98112 (206) 323-7106 FAX (206) 328-9050 August 8, 1997 RE: Heritage Woods, Lots 52 - 59 (Old designations) Mr. David Morrison ParkLane Ventures 31620 - 23=d Ave. S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Dear Mr. Morrison: At your request, I inspected the vegetation to be found in lots designated as #52 to #59 of the Heritage Woods subdivision. The west side of these lots fronts on 26th Ave. S and 25th Pl. S. The east side of these lots is west of a pond and Wetland D. Lots 52 and 53 include areas with over 40% slope. Lots 54 to 57 include a sewer easement along their eastern edge. A proposed fill of these lots would encroach upon the 100 ft buffer for wetland D and, to a limited degree, the buffer for Wet- land F east of Lots 57 and 58. The western portion of these lots contains fill placed during road development to the West of these lots. I refer you to the Lot Grading Overview of this area prepared by Jaeger Engineering. The purpose of this memo is to provide you with an assessment of the vegetation on these lots. General Vegetation Overall, the vegetation is heavily disturbed. The.overstory is dominated by red alder and big -leaf maple, with several medium to large Douglas firs and one red cedar. The understory is dominated by a mixture of taller shrubs including vine maple, red elderberry, and osoberry. The ground layer is dominated by trailing blackberry in more disturbed sites and sword fern with salal and low Oregon grape in less disturbed sites. Most of the forest vegetation of this east -facing slope is open. This vegetation de- veloped under a closed forest condition. Previous clearing for paved roads along the west, gravel maintenance roads along the east side, and various clearings for easements exposed this vegetation to higher temperatures, more wind, greater desiccation, and an enhanced potential for wind -throw. 08/12/97 TUE 13:26 [TX/RI NO 53671 AUG-12-97 TUE 13:32 P,10 Specific Descriptions Lots 52-53 The vegetation of these lots is open and broken_ Sewer easements have further opened up the vegetation on Lot 53. The dominant canopy is big -leaf maple with broken limbs and snags. The core area includes a few red elderberry and red huckleberry shrubs, but the shrub and ground layers are dominated by trailing blackberry and weeds such as fireweed and bull thistle. The tree vegetation on the steep slope is unhealthy and will be subject to wind throw during future storms. Filling these lots for construction will not impinge on a wetland buffer, nor will it remove any significant vegetation. Lots 54-55 These lots are dominated by senescent and broken red alder. Several of these trees are dead or dying. Two spindly Douglas firs occur on near the toe of the existing fill. These two trees have a very small crown and a thin diameter for their height. They were clearly subordinate trees grown in a dense forest under with little shade. They are very stressed under the existing conditions and are liable to be toppled by wind. The understory is dominated by scrubby vine maple, salmonberry, red elderberry, an ocean spray, some sword fern, and considerable fireweed. Filling these lots will not impinge on a wetland buffer, nor will it remove any significant vegetation. Many healthy trees in the vicinity were top- pled during storms of the past winter. It is unlikely that any of the trees on these two lots will survive much longer. Most are in steady decline and all are subject to being blown down, particularly when the soil on the steep slope is saturated. Lots 56-57 These lots are dominated by open red alder and big -leaf maple re -growth. There is a spindly Douglas fr. The shrub layer is dominated by scrubby vine maple, with some salmonberry and osoberry. The ground layer is dominated by trailing blackberry and sword fern. The toe of the fill for Lot 55 would not encroach on the buffer for Wetland D. The fill on Lot 56 would encroach the buffer but would not appear to require the loss of any tree over 12 inches in diameter (no maple, alder or conifer appear to be in this area), where the vegetation is disturbed and dominated by shrubs. Lots 58 This lot contains three large, tall Douglas firs. Two are near the toe of the exist- ing fill (though one may be on Lot 59). The third is near the south-east corner of the proposed U. A fourth large tree is on Lot 59. There are also mature big -leaf 08/12/97 TUE 13:26 [TX/RX NO 53671 AUG-12-97 TUE 13:33 P. 11 maple and smaller red alder on this lot. The shrub layer is dominated by vine maple and red elderberry. The understory is dominated by trailing blackberry in the open areas, and by sword fern, with salal, Oregon grape, bald -hip rose, and bleeding heart sound in places. The vegetation on this lot is the least disturbed of any on the several lots, but it too is open and, on the margins, disturbed. The toe of the slope would kill one large maple. The large Douglas fir (ca_ 24 inch diameter) would probably survive since the fill would terminate before smothering its roots. Any destruction of larger trees could be mitigated by planting large individuals of the same species once construction is completed. Lots 59 This lot is not proposed for filling, and includes the access road leading to the pond. The western portion of this lot contains mature forest dominated by big - leaf maple, with some red alder_ The shrub vegetation is relatively diverse, including vine maple, red elderberry, osoberry and red huckleberry, with sword fern. The eastern portion, however, is heavily disturbed, with the margin domi- nated by Himalayan blackberry. Conclusions The buffer for Wetland D occurs in its present location because this wetland has a small arm (maximum width 30 ft) extending west and uphill from the main wet- land. Thus the buffer is over 6 times wider than the wetland. Filling within this buffer would not have an impact on this arm of the wetland. Most of the vegetation on these lots is under stress due to previous clearing, grading, and, possibly, due to other factors. The red alders are mature and ap- pear to be nearing the end of their normal life -span (60 to 80 years). Most of the Douglas firs are spindly, under stress, and subject to wind throw. From the perspective of the value of the existing vegetation, there is no substan- tive reason to contra -indicate filling of these lots. Any wildlife value will be compromised by the adjacent development now under construction and likely increases in human intrusion. Left alone under the existing conditions, most of the trees, which define the forest, will continue to degenerate. As a consequence, Himalayan blackberry, trailing blackberry, Scoes broom, and herbaceous weeds (e.g., fireweed and thistles) will become increasingly dominant. Their presence will preclude reestablishment of forest vegetation. Vine maple and elderberry may persist in less disturbed portions of the lots. 08/12/97 TUE 13:26 [TX/RX NO 53671 AUG-12-97 TUE 13:34 P. 12 Lot 58 contains more healthy and more mature trees, some of which are in the Buffer to Wetland D. One or two of these large Douglas firs might be lost in the development process. Appropriate landscaping could replace them quantitatively, but there would be a qualitative loss. This loss is mitigated by the presence of two large Douglas firs on Lot 59 and several more immediately east. Here, several Douglas firs up to 28 inches in diameter occur, along with big -leaf maple, red alder and an understory of vine maple, elderberry, and sword fern. If you have questions concerning my observations, please contact me. Sincerely, 4� Dr. Roger del Moral Owner 4 08/12/97 TUE 13:26 [TX/RX NO 53671 b RECEIVED BY ""- "DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 7/15/97 JUL 15 1997 Mr. Jim Harris Via FAX/661-4129 Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33530 1 st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Heritage Woods Tracts H & J Grading Permit Dear Jim; PARKLAND ParkLane Executive Center 31620-23id Avenue South #320 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Telephone: (206) 946-3652 Fax: (206) 946-3580 Please find enclosed the Geo-Technical Engineering Report completed by Golder and Associates entitled "Proposed Site Grading Alternatives". This report is the second part of their report. The initial report described the existing site conditions and made recommendations for slope stabilization. This second report analyzes alternative grading proposals, and provides the details of the location and amount of fill of our recommended proposal. After stabilizing the slope per the initial Golder Report, we propose to fill the two Tracts H & J, to create more conventional building sites, within the 7 lots to be contained within Tracts H & J. Our initial application was to fill Tracts H & J and retain all of the fill within the lots with structural walls that extended 14-18 feet high. We are now proposing to utilize more fill and to extend the fill beyond the rear of the lots, into the Open Space and the Wetland Buffer Tracts owned by the Homeowners Association. Exhibit A of the Golder report shows the amount of fill required for the three alternatives. Fill Volume 1. Maintain all fill within the tracts (lots) and install high 14-18 foot walls to retain the fill. 26,426 Cu. Yds. 2. Extend the fill beyond the rear of the tracts (lots) at a slope of 2H:IV. 32,356 Cu. Yds. 3. Extend the fill beyond the rear of the tracts (lots) at a slope of 3H:IV. 36,576 Cu. Yds. Our application is for approval of Alternative 2 which would extend the full slope beyond the rear of the lots at a slope of 2H:IV, which would increase the amount of fill by We are committed to quality, value and service to fr a customers' fk!lls and txctCtheir expecraUvrrs. (32,356-26,426) 6,130 cu. yds., and eliminate the steep retaining structures required to retain the reduced amount of fill within the lots. Attached to the report is Jim Jaeger's plan, "Lot Grading Overview", showing where the fill, at a 2:1 slope from the rear of the lot, would extend into the Open Space Tract and Wetland Buffer. To mitigate for the fill section within the Open Space and Wetland Buffer area, we are prepared to landscape and enhance the Open Space Tract and Wetland Buffer with a landscape plan which will beautify the existing vegetation, which now contains only scrub alders and maples. We believe Alternative 2 provides the most attractive and safest solution to creating more conventional and livable single family lots. With the extended fill within the Open Space and Wetland Buffer, the lots will be graded as a smooth transition from lots to Open Space and Wetland Buffer without high retaining walls which would create a safety hazard and which would not be as attractive as landscaped slopes. Please advise me if you require further information to complete your review of our Grading Permit Application, for Tracts H & J, to ensure of its completeness. Sincerely, h David Morrison cc: Jim Johnson - Golder & Assoc.. Jim Jaeger - Jaeger Eng. Gino Nonni - Parklane Ventures, Inc. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental and Geotechnical Services Mr. Jim Harris City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003 Comm, �p�� D 13Y FEB 18 1997 RE: PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REVIEW OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS HERITAGE WOODS TRACTS H AND J FILL, GRADING AND WALL FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Harris: February 14, 1997 In accordance with your request, Landau Associates, Inc. is submitting this proposal to provide geotechnical review for the City of Federal Way (City) of project documents for the proposed Heritage Woods Tracts H and J Fill, Grading and Wall, located in Federal Way, Washington. The purpose of our services will be to review and comment on the geotechnical aspects of the project design documents provided to us by the City. SCOPE OF SERVICES As requested in the Consultant Authorization Form, Landau Associates will provide the following specific services: • Attend a pre -review meeting with the City and project design team. • Complete a site visit to verify site conditions as described, and identify significant site features. ■ Review the Hemphill Engineers and Jaeger Engineering plans for compliance with the FWCC Section 22-1286 (geologic Hazardous Areas) and other applicable codes and regulations. • Prepare and submit a memorandum summarize our review comments and recommendations. Our preliminary assessment suggests that numerous items will need to be addressed unless the applicant changes the current rockery design to another form or retaining structure. WORLD TRADE CENTER • 3600 PORT OF TACOMA ROAD • SUITE 209 • TACOMA, WA 98424 • (206) 926-2493 • FAX (206) 926-2531 EDMONDS: (206) 778-0907 • FAX (206) 778-6409 / SPOKANE: (509) 327-9737 • FAX (509) 327-9691 TERMS AND CONDITIONS Our services will be provided on a time -and -expense basis in accordance with our current on call services contract with the City of Federal Way. The estimated fee to complete the above scope of services is $2,133, as summarized in the attached Table 1. It should be noted that projects of this type can require several cycles of review and resubmittal of design documents. This proposal does not included budget for subsequent review of resubmittals. If requested by the City to complete subsequent reviews of resubmitted design documents, we will provide the City with a scope and estimated budget to complete that review. If project requirements change or unforeseen conditions are encountered that require services beyond the scope outlined above, we will bring these to your attention and seek approval for modification to the scope of services and budget, as appropriate. If the above scope of services and fees are satisfactory, please provide written authorization to proceed with the above scope of services. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, please call the undersigned at (206) 926-2493. EJH/WDE/jmh No. 14.000 02/14/97 D:\LANDAMHERITAGE.PRO Attachments: Table 1 2 Copies Submitted 2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. By: Edward J. Heav . , P.E. Senior Project Engineer and William D. Evans, CPG Associate LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. TABLE 1 ESTIMATED FEE HERITAGE WOODS TRACTS H AND J CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Task Prereview meeting with City Sr. Project Engineer Site visit Sr. Project Engineer Review of plans for compliance with applicable codes and regulations Associate Sr. Project Engineer Memorandum (includes one draft) Associate Sr Project Enginner Project Coordinator Word Processing Clerical Reimburseables Hourly Hours Rate Total 2 $ 93.00 $ 186.00 2 $ 93.00 $ 186.00 2 $ 115.00 $ 230.00 4 $ 93.00 $ 372.00 2 $ 115.00 $ 230.00 7 $ 93.00 $ 651.00 2 $ 49.00 $ 98.00 1 $ 45.00 $ 45.00 1 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 TOTAL $ 2,133.00 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. LANDAU AASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental and Geotechnical Services February 14, 1997 Mr. Jim Harris City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003 RE: PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REVIEW OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS HERITAGE WOODS TRACTS H AND J FILL, GRADING AND WALL FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Harris: In accordance with your request, Landau Associates, Inc. is submitting this proposal to provide geotechnical review for the City of Federal Way (City) of project documents for the proposed Heritage Woods Tracts H and J Fill, Grading and Wall, located in Federal Way, Washington. The purpose of our services will be to review and comment on the geotechnical aspects of the project design documents provided to us by the City. SCOPE OF SERVICES As requested in the Consultant Authorization Form, Landau Associates will provide the following specific services: • Attend a pre -review meeting with the City and project design team. • Complete a site visit to verify site conditions as described, and identify significant site features. ■ Review the Hemphill Engineers and Jaeger Engineering plans for compliance with the FWCC Section 22-1286 (geologic Hazardous Areas) and other applicable codes and regulations. * Prepare and submit a memorandum summarize our review comments and recommendations. Our preliminary assessment suggests that numerous items will need to be addressed unless the applicant changes the current rockery design to another form or retaining structure. WORLD TRADE CENTER • 3600 PORT OF TACOMA ROAD • SUITE 209 • TACOMA, WA 98424 • (206) 926-2493 • FAX (206) 926-2531 EDMONDS: (206) 778-0907 • FAX (206) 778-6409 / SPOKANE: (509) 327-9737 • FAX (509) 327-9691 TERMS AND CONDITIONS Our services will be provided on a time -and -expense basis in accordance with our current on call services contract with the City of Federal Way. The estimated fee to complete the above scope of services is $2,133, as summarized in the attached Table 1. It should be noted that projects of this type can require several cycles of review and resubmittal of design documents. This proposal does not included budget for subsequent review of resubmittals. If requested by the City to complete subsequent reviews of resubmitted design documents, we will provide the City with a scope and estimated budget to complete that review. If project requirements change or unforeseen conditions are encountered that require services beyond the scope outlined above, we will bring these to your attention and seek approval for modification to the scope of services and budget, as appropriate. If the above scope of services and fees are satisfactory, please provide written authorization to proceed with the above scope of services. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, please call the undersigned at (206) 926-2493. EJH/WDE/jmh No. 14.000 02/14/97 DALANDAMHERITAGETRO Attachments: Table 1 2 Copies Submitted 2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. By: Edward J. Heavey, P.E. Senior Project Engineer and William D. Evans, CPG Associate LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. TABLE 1 ESTIMATED FEE HERITAGE WOODS TRACTS H AND J CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Hourly Task Hours Rate Total Prereview meeting with City Sr. Project Engineer 2 $ 93.00 $ 186.00 Site visit Sr. Project Engineer 2 $ 93.00 $ 186.00 Review of plans for compliance with applicable codes and regulations Associate 2 $ 115.00 $ 230.00 Sr. Project Engineer 4 $ 93.00 $ 372.00 Memorandum (includes one draft) Associate 2 $ 115.00 $ 230.00 Sr Project Enginner 7 $ 93.00 $ 651.00 Project Coordinator 2 $ 49.00 $ 98.00 Word Processing 1 $ 45.00 $ 45.00 Clerical 1 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 Reimburseables $ 100.00 $ 100.00 TOTAL $ 2,133.00 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. { r �J P. E CONSULTING ENGINEERS • a ► cn oZZN W r c2 NLu r } > W m ? > Q W Z_ Cn O W J � Z 5 0 • ► • w s EnwN Lu <inQ J W Z Q > Z) Z W � � H O O • N Z (n 0 p w Z F O ui U w W r w a v) Z (n Z C7 O Z Z H Y W p U w (n w z Q W ° ► . U) z o 0 r w w LL Z O w Z5 a m Z x 3 w w o a z_° r VW r =) m J O 7 O W (n N • • ► GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR THE PROPOSED HERITAGE WOODS ROCKERY LOCATED AT SOUTH 282"d STREET and MILITARY ROAD FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 26 November, 1996 4041 WEST LAKE SAMMAMISH PARKWAY SOUTHEAST ► BELLEVUE ► WASHINGTON . 98008 9 206 644 1080 PROJECT NUMBER 2148 03 December 1996 page 1 of 14 pages CLIENT Parklane Ventures Suite 320 31620 23rd Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003 REFERENCE : Heritage Woods Rockery On Lots 52 to 58 SUBJECT Geotechnical & environmental engineering & rockery design INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to present the results of a geotechnical investigation, and environmental analysis, and rockery design for a retaining rockery at the proposed Heritage Woods project. The project is located at South 282nd Street and Military Road, Federal Way, as shown opposite page. i Figure 1 n the The investigation and authorized by David Parklane Ventures on 1996 while conversing Hemphill of HEMPHILL ENGINEERS. INVESTIGATION HEMPHILL conducted geologic _r-e.search of the gen vicinity of the site shown in figure on the next page. The geologic map shows the site to be covered with glacial till, although HEMPHILL and James Eaton, who conducted a previous investigation, both observed till and glacial outwash at the site. HEMPHILL conducted probing, penetration tests, and a visual report were Morrison of 7 November with Dale C. CONSULTING classification of the soils exposed in 4 test pits. The test pits were located ,within the soils that will support the rockery. The rockery will be placed on undisturbed soils that are weathered glacial till and/or glacial outwash. HEMPHILL also conducted a visual classification of the probable soils to be supported by the rockery. The soils to be supported will be composed of fill from local soils to be placed during the construriion of the rockery. PROJECT NUP. _R 2148 03 December o page 2 of 14 pages ROCKERY DESIGN The rockery was designed based on the drawing titled "Plat of Heritage Woods Grading Plan and Profiles, Lots 50 - 59" by Jaeger Engineering dated 7/18/96. The following pages explain the enera design of a rockery, and the specific design of the proposed rockery, showing the design parameters used by HEMPHILL. The construction options give the optional rockery dimensions to be determined at the time of construction as heights, soil conditions, and proposed house locations are exposed and observed. FIVE CONSIDERATIONS in the DESIGN of ROCKERIES 1. DISINTEGRATION of ROCK The problem of disintegration of rocks, can only be improved by proper inspection, testing, and control at the quarry. It is sometimes difficult for the rockery contractors, and the inspectors, to recognize poor quality rocks. �•r The written contract with the quarry should make it their responsibility to supply quality rocks that will not disintegrate due to weathering. 2. SLIDING BETWEEN ROCKS The lateral pressures behind the rockery caused by the soils that the rockery is supporting are resisted by the friction forces between the rocks. The friction forces are determined by the weight of all the rocks above. The greater the weight of the rocks above an intersection between 2 To prevent deterioration from weathering, only top quality rocks should be used. The rocks should be hard, sound, durable, and should be free from weak seams, cracks, and other defects tending to destroy resistance to weathering. The proposed Wilkerson rocks do not normally have a problem of disintegration. rocks, the greater the friction force at that intersection that will resist sliding. The resistance to sliding can be increased by tipping the rockery back so that the upper rock must slide uphill on the lower rock. i�-'Il1lirPp HE� �IL; PROJECT NUM, A 2148 03 December 15'--j page 3 of 14 pages That method of increasing resistance to sliding has been ignored in the design process because of the difficulty to control the angle between rocks. The resistance can also be increased by wedging the rocks so that peaks and valleys are interlocked. That value cannot be considered in the design of a rockery because it is dependent on the shape of the rocks and the way that the rocks are placed, 3. OVERTURNING BETWEEN ROCKS Overturning can occur at any intersection between two rocks. The upper portion of the rockery will rotate at the outermost point of contact if overturning occurs. If the outermost point of contact is at the outer edge of either rock, then the rocks above have the greatest resistance to overturning. If the outermost point of contact is somewhere inside the outer edge of either rock, then the resistance to overturning will be decreased in direct proportion to the distance from the centroid of the entire rockery above the intersection to the front point of contact between the two rocks which can vary greatly throughout a rockery. The values of friction are determined assuming smooth surfaces and ignoring the large peaks and valleys. The values of friction are fairly consistent, and generally are not dependent on the area of contact between the two rocks, but good construction practice would require that each rock should be placed so that there is a large area of contact between the rocks. compared to the distance from the upper rockery centroid to the outer face of the two rocks. When the minimum allowable thickness of rockery at a section is required to resist sliding, then the pivot point of the rockery for overturning can be behind the outer edge and still be within the required safety factor. If the required minimum thickness of rockery is to prevent overturning, then rocks should be placed that are in contact at or near the outer edge, or thicker rocks should be placed. PROJECT NUM—_R 2148 03 December 1yzv6 page 4 of 14 pages 4. SLIDING BETWEEN ROCK and SOIL a. PASSIVE RESISTANCE to SLIDING The soils in front of the lower rocks will provide the passive forces that will help to resist the lateral movement of the rockery. The strength of the passive resisting soils result b. FRICTION RESISTANCE to SLIDING Also resisting the sliding of the rockery will be the friction force between the bottom rock and the approved 5. BUCKLING of ROCKERY Buckling can occur with tilting rockeries that are thinner because they do not resist much lateral forces. The buckling results from the lateral components of the weight of the partially from the weight of the soil in front of the rockery, and from the cohesion and internal friction of those soils that determine their shearing strength. bearing soil, which is determined by the roughness of the soil and the weight of the rockery. upper rockery tipping the lower rockery. That method of failure will not occur on this project because the rockeries are retaining soils, therefore the rocks are much larger. PROJECT NUM, _R 2148 03 December 15.,E _ page 5 of 14 pages DESIGN PARAMETERS for ROCKERY figure on the posite page�Id- CKERY & - PARAMETERS" gives all the presumed or tested physical properties of the soils, and the 1. FORCES on ROCKERY properties of the rock, that are used by HEMPHILL to design the rockery. The parameters that were used to design the rockery are explained in the following paragraphs. a. DRIVING PRESSURES FROM COMPACTED BACKFILL The lateral pressures used for design purposes are determined based on the use of the anticipated worst soil conditions that might occur in the lifetime of the rockery. The conditions that can change are the cohesion of the soils, and seepage and runoff erosion. HEMPHILL assumed that the driving soils will have no cohesion under the worst conditions, therefore the internal friction of 0.58 (30 degrees) with no cohesion will determine the minimum anticipated strength of the fill soils in a compacted condition. If properly compacted the fill soils should be much stronger, therefore the 0.58 friction factor is conservative. Also, assuming proper control of surface runoff, there will always be cohesion. To achieve the proper strength and resistance to sliding, the fill soils should be compacted to a density of 90% of the Modified Proctor maximum density (ASTM D1557). HERL I- PROJECT NUN _'R 2148 03 December 1 page 6 of 14 pages b. LATERAL RESISTING PRESSURES 1. FRICTIONAL RESISTANCE Frictional resistance to sliding between the undisturbed soils and the bottom of the rockery will be the estimated rock/soil friction factor x the vertical weight of the rockery. 2. PASSIVE RESISTANCE The soils directly in front of the lower rock offer passive resistance to movement at the base of the rockery. The greater the depth of the lower rock or rocks below the final grade (KEY), the greater the passive resistance. The minimum value of passive lateral resistance in the undisturbed soils would be SAFETY FACTOR and INSPECTION The safety factor applied to a rockery design is directly related to the degree of expert inspection. Of course other factors are included in the decision for safety factor, such as confidence in the contractor, the source and confidence in the rock, the adjacent soils, groundwater and surface water control, and any other potential hazards. A lower safety factor of approximately 1.7 might be HEMPHILL assumed the friction factor between the bottom rock and the undisturbed silty soils to be approximately 0.5, which is typical of test measurements made by HEMPHILL. determined by the strength of the soils. The properties that determine the strength of the passive soils are cohesion and internal friction. HEMPHILL presumed that there would be minimal cohesion of 200 psf, and an internal friction of 0.7 (350). acceptable for a full time inspection, but for small walls 'the inspection might be more costly than over - design. A safety factor of 2 might be acceptable for periodic inspections A safety factor of 2.5 might be acceptable for a single inspection after the wall has been completed, or where no inspection is anticipated USE -I IM RINIX L PROJECT NUM, 12148 04 December 1 s� page 7 of 14 pages DIMENSIONS of ROCKERY Figure 4 wn on the previous page EXAMPLE DESIGN ROCKERY" shows approximately how a rockery should look, and shows the variables used to design the rockery. igure� the opposite page titled f ERY CONSTRUCTION OPTIONS" the required minimum dimensions for a 1 foot section of rockery, for various minimum rockery thickness, rockery heights, and for various angles of tilt. All the required minimum dimensions are calculated based on the same factor of safety, therefore all the rockery options are equally safe. EXPLANATION of "ROCKERY OPTIONS for CONSTRUCTION" iguref�ri the next page titled DESIGN ROCKERY VS CONSTRUCTED ROCKERY" shows an example of the appearance of the designed rockery versus the approximate actual constructed appearance. Figure 5 is an example that shows 1 of the 5 rockery designs based on a minimum thickness of rocks from front to rear of 2.0'. The 11 x 17 insert included in this report shows the five rockery designs based on minimum thicknesses of rock from front to rear of 2.0', 25, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 feet. The contractor can sometimes choose any size rockery based on the most appropriate for the height of the rockery at that location. For very high rockeries, the bottom rocks can become very large; therefore the larger the rocks at the top, the smaller the rocks required at the bottom to achieve the required weight necessary to accumulate the required friction resistance to sliding. All rockery options shown at each height have the minimum safety factor or larger, therefore any choice of rockery is appropriate for safety, but smaller rockeries might be cheaper. Figure 5 shows the vertical height of the rockery in the left column under HEIGHT. The required dimensions of the rockery shown, to the right of HEIGHT can be for a rockery of that total height, or can be for that portion of a higher rockery. The tilt back of the rockery measured along the back of the rockery is shown at the top row in degrees, and in the second row in the ratio vertical distance to horizontal distance. The tilt back of the rockery is shown in 50 intervals ranging from 00 (vertical) to 350. The excavated soil surface behind the rockery, or the structural fill surface, should be at the angle of tilt back. IEE'�; PROJECT NUM, 2148 03 December 1: _ i page 8 of 14 pages At each interval of height the required thickness of the rockery to resist sliding and overturning at that interval over the next rock down is shown under the columns SLID for the required thickness to resist sliding, and OVTN for the required thickness to resist overturning. If the dimension given under the OVTN column is larger than that given under the SLID column, then that dimension is the minimum allowable rockery thickness, or the distance measured from the rear of the rockery to the pivot point between the rocks to prevent overturning. The pivot point is the first point of contact between two rocks from the front of the rockery. If the OVTN distance is equal to or greater than the SLID distance, then the required rockery thickness was determined for overturning rather than sliding. If OVTN is less than SLID, then the required minimum rockery thickness was determined based on sliding. If the value for OVTN is zero, then the rocks are apparently leaning into the slope, and overturning is negative and is not a problem. The values shown under the column KEY, indicating the depth to key the bottom rock, is the required depth of the bottom rock or rocks to be placed below the ground surface to achieve passive resistance to sliding. The required key shown at each height is only for a rockery with that total height, otherwise the KEY value has no meaning at intermediate heights if the rockery- has a greater height. The horizontal distance taken up by the rockery from the front of the bottom rock to the back of the top rock is shown under the column HD for 'horizontal distance'. That value will help to choose the rockery that will best fit into limited spaces. The total weight of the rockery for that particular height and angle of tilt back is shown under the column WRK for 'weight of rock including key'. That value can be used to help choose the cheapest rockery, and can also be used to estimate the cost of the rockery at that location. The WRK column has no meaning at intermediate heights of the rockeries because the weight of the key has been included. PROJECT NUM. -,R 2148 03 December 15page 9 of 14 pages QUALITY and DENSITY of ROCKS To prevent deterioration from weathering, only top quality rocks should be used. The rocks should be hard, sound, durable, and should be free from seams, cracks, and other defects tending to destroy resistance to weathering. It should be the responsibility of the supplier to conduct tests in accordance with specifications presented by the American Society of Testing Materials, and to make available to the contractor only rocks that pass those specifications. If basalt rocks are used the whole rock should be either tested or inspected for weak seams. Basalt rocks usually have PLACEMENT of ROCKS Rocks should have fairly flat tops NO GOOD! and bottoms to allow for adequate contact to resist overturning, and to allow for a relatively tight wall. Rocks should be placed so that NO GOOD! the vertical seam between 2 adjacent rocks is not above or below the vertical seam for the upper and lower layers. In other words, as much as possible, each GOOD! rock should overlap at least two different rocks below. The contact surface between 2 rocks should be sloped up at the same angle as the tilt back, but the design process is based on a a density of 165 pcf and a friction factor of 0.55. Wilkerson rocks, which have less weak seams, should be designed for a density of 155 pcf and a higher friction factor of 0.65. Any slight deviation in density is insignificant in the design process. Lighter rocks are not necessarily weaker rocks. The rocks should have a density nearly equal to 'the density used for the rockery design shown in Figure 3 on page 5. If rocks of a significantly lower density are used, then the required dimensions shown in Figure 5 on page 7 must be adjusted in direct proportion to the change in density. worst case where the contact surface is horizontal. The contact surface should never be sloped down. Rock shapes should be chosen and placed so that no more than 20% of the wall is voids. A higher percentage of voids increases the required weight of rock needed to resist overturning and sliding. If a different void volume is placed, then the required rockery sizes must be adjusted in direct proportion with the change in voids so that the required rockery weights to resist sliding will be achieved. If it is known that the voids will be higher because of available rock shapes, or because of less construction control, then the rockery can be designed with the higher void ratio. PROJECT NUME 2148 03 December 15 page 11 of 14 pages Rockery drains should be sloped to allow drainage without creating low spots where water will accumulate. HEMPHILL recommends a slope of at least 0.01 ft/ft (17100'). The size and type of perforated pipe should be determined by HEMPHILL based on the anticipated vertical loading, the quantity of water to be conducted, and the grain size of the adjacent drainage material. The perforated pipe should be connected to solid pipe after leaving the area to be drained. The solid pipe should not be connected to any other ROCKERY INSPECTION HEMPHILL should inspect the excavations for proper tilt back and key depth, and to discuss the proposed rockery sizes and construction with the contractor. Further inspections should be conducted during construction to verify that the contractor is drainage systems before a catch basin that can overflow below the lowest elevation of the rockery drain. That will prevent another drainage system that conducts heavy quantities of water, such as a downspout, from clogging and backing up through the rockery drains. Surface runoff should be intercepted by an impervious trench behind the rockery to prevent large quantities of stormwater from infiltrating behind the rockery, or from flowing over the face of the rockery. proceeding in accordance with the requirements presented in the report, and with discussions between the contractor and HEMPHILL. A final inspection should be conducted after the rockery is completed but prior to the contractor leaving the site. PLACEMENT of STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill can be composed of any of the clean glacially deposited soils at the site that is approved by HEMPHILL. Although any of the natural site soils can be used as fill, the proper water content during compaction is imperative to achieve the desired density of 90% of the Modified Proctor maximum density (ASTM D1557). If glacial till is wet beyond the optimum water content then it is generally impossible to compact. The ability to compact recessional outwash varies with the silt content. PROJECT NUML 2148 03 December 112page 12 of 14 pages The fill will be placed in the back yards of Lots 52 through 59. The final grade of the fill will have a maximum slope of 3H : 1 V (18.50 or 33%). The existing slope is composed of compacted fill, but the outer surface of 1 to 2 feet could not be compacted to the same density as the underlying soils. That is typical of the placement of the outer edge of soils on steep slopes. The loose outer surface soils must be compacted prior to the placement of the structural fill soils. The proposed house foundations must not be supported by soils that are retained by the rockery. Foundations must be placed on approved bearing soils that are below a line that is 1 V:2H from the base of the rockery, or on glacially compacted soils that are determined by HEMPHILL to be stable. If lateral resisting piles are chosen for foundations, the piles should be either designed or approved by HEMPHILL because of the complexity of that process. PROTECTION of "STEEP SLOPE" There is a 40% slope area on lots 52 and 53, and a utility easement between lots 53 and 54. The present plan shows a rockery along the north side of lot 54. The purpose of that rockery is to prevent fill from imposing onto lot 53 and the 25 foot buffer zone of the 40% slope area. That 20 foot rockery, and a 12 foot rockery along the south side of the house on lot 53; would be supporting fill adjacent to the foundations and the basement floors of the houses, therefore those houses would need to be supported by lateral resisting piles, and would need structural basement floors. The heights of those rockeries adjacent to the houses would be hazardous to the occupants. The 40% slope ordinance should only be used as a guide for further investigation by a qualified geotechnical engineer, and should never be used as a final determination of stability, since slopes much less than 40% can be unstable, and slopes much greater than 40% can be stable. Because of the strength of the underlying soils, the 40% slope area is probably stable. There is no value to protect the 40% slope area since it adds no value to the environment. I'$I- E:1�� rprlr PROJECT NUM, R 2148 03 December 1: J _ page 13 of 14 pages Since the only purpose of all environmental laws and ordinances is to protect the life, health, safety, and welfare of the public, then in this case the ordinance is inappropriate. If the area were unstable, then it is not rational to protect an unstable area downhill from the proposed houses. The buffer does nothing to decrease the hazard to the slope or the houses. If the "steep slope" is considered to be a "hazard" to the public, then that hazard can be easily mitigated by reducing the slope. The protection of the slope is not aesthetically pleasing, and is potentially hazardous to inhabitants, because the houses will have a steep drop at the back door. Some local building departments protect steep slopes based on erosion potential during construction. With proper temporary protection in accordance with the existing ordinances, and proper enforcement, erosion from the site during construction can be controlled to an acceptable level, and can often be decreased from the natural erosion. With proper design, erosion after construction is always less than natural erosion because of the reduction of soil surfaces, proper landscaping to prevent erosion, and control of stormwater runoff. The steeper slope will also allow surface runoff to run faster into the wetland buffer with an increased potential to cause erosion at the base of the slope. Because of the potential hazards from the high walls adjacent to lots 53 and 54, and because of the steep slopes downhill from lots 52 and 53, HEMPHILL recommends that the 40% slopes be filled to reduce the slope and the potential slide hazard, to reduce runoff erosion, and to be more aesthetically pleasing. The fill and base rockery can then be continued through the utility easement until it tails out at lot 51. PROTECTION of WETLAND and BUFFER There is a wetland buffer at the base of the slope that has been disturbed during the placement of utilities, and C there is presently very little vegetation in the buffer zone. To protect the wetland area, a temporary silt fence or other barrier can be placed, although most of the runoff will run parallel to the barrier. The disturbed buffer can then be used to construct the proposed rockery and to conduct grading of the fill placed to reduce the slope. IN eIED, �P ��IrI g PROJECT NUME__.< 2148 03 December 19a, _ page 14 of 14 pages The 100 foot buffer at the base of the slope is a "magic number" that has no meaning. Some important environmental areas need more than a 100 foot buffer (depending on the buffer) to protect the ecology. Other areas need very little buffer, and sometimes an effective man made buffer is more appropriate when a buffer zone infringes within areas important for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, which is the number one priority for all environmental laws and - ordinances. he 100 foot buffer at this site is not �� j k&,,1, 4IL �[.tAAL, Dale C. Hemphill P.E. rjA I Registered Engineer No. 14777 State of Washington 'jt) 1[, j )d n,,A�k P Cv/V%-re' flvu I�jJ GOOe A�xpz ,f 1 necessary considering the area that is being protected, and the condition of the existing buffer zone. The protected wetland is isolated and has no significant impact on other critical environments. The buffer zone could be decreased and an interceptor mound and trench could be installed. That would allow for a more gentle slope and smaller rockery, which would be more aesthetically pleasing, and safer for children. 4 t; 14m D ISTR� ti SinNAL�t� EXPIRES 17 FEBRUARY 1998 I'I�E�A6�I�]PREEL�7I A'•''r�ifCLJ-v1: :�.,:.rti,fr•,{e-Y: y_ . 7ez•,�.�M�•. ...:i+r +L, .. N �' ryl�., r ps N � Ntn $ Zd a "A r_. M.)A S a fF r m yyLO CASAY Ftl N J. y 10TH AV *5 a�s� 1°�y S y s � a A 3r z V SCDP ` ,.. AV 14 AV S LA h7 N 1 f AV w S �a v 14 PL S R7 •. ,..,. _ .. pv '_ :�' �i $ = r 15T PL S 15TH AV 5 AF r:C/) gi s".`gip LLn 1TTH AV Im �v c 1p i i r .c ti.` ; �x C. �: �.-_��%•��-: '^t;,xr<-a-z;. a;';�_ 18TH PL S / ins n =Di�j 1 Pk S Z 20TH PL S r r f 1� �-,_ .JUG S: .. _� J+^.:#.•r, e Y � � -ru ! rn �� - y. lad .1 ^-.... :}h.... - 1ii9� '� .z•,�,'�r: � a �_';' ^' '[rYz .vim :•-'; S a 26Tk 2E THAV cr, '•.Y .r�. .5 in N .—L{ -QC, Z. Ln v31ST cr, >, 3 ND AV S y AV. 5 2ND . N sn A � 32ND PL AV S 3PM0 PL 5 ^'RD -A 33k L" H 34TH 33RA PL S S :.; 4TH AV S AV 5 - 3 �' 357ii S 35TH AV o �lY - `tip `. 367H H N. AV S 37TH 5 s a"' ,;x 8TN AV 3TTH P ' ! - �` `• 36TH co _ �1 {�Ty _ � � Yj •. ' .. ... - Y. s. KF�a'`kk � _ � ate' .P-, TM AV S 40TH 41ST AV = -� r... ,.•,.� ns 42NO AY �= -: S S_:� r.. 42ND AV NG c _ J43RD 5 45 Al:; f ._ �. vlyTy _a='ii:'. . . - • .. ram.._. r.,, .' •S _.... _ -. ... :r• s . r •! l :.�• ■` it ■ ■ vp a do yL�rr.. 'k�it'=�; s$i-�_ '+■r�- .�. T" ■ ■ ,- �-■, -:pJ. ,•'.�...i�n.• i7�,. e*"=i is `^ - r . �' n'�v• ,,;_ •t..- - .•r u: '. ,rr•.i:••rr''�i''.''_.yy:�rt-;;'��' .1 Eiji • Sri:. • r■R �'•.�.. VI ■ ■, I .�t�. xck^,�#.ems r ■, 00 W " • 77 'SY+ �4 ' � � � • R� � _ -, F-�V .GirYfSy::tiyj.�,.. F 10 r y fyrsi � • " �+ - Z airr ,4 f } ir. �•.:.'.'': ~re.•'• .�'.. s ■ . W .11 , ■ Q IQ •:+ y:i?,,- :ar:-c. �.7_ ir: :drL� '. ct� • 1 , 1 r �5� J��R y" . QQ - _ �[ • .: r':-• 'i wix.�'• r ��-'�"�.. ,•_.�:�F: � '. Ax['_ y",;, + Q• � � l . '�.' ' rc-.� �� . tit • �WI I +wl:t�� ,• I f'. 1n •!t>' �L'• • `x��`�'-fit � - - .R ■- � � • •' .;�' •�•�. FIGURE 3 ROC IERY & SOIL DESIG � PARAMETERS ---------------------- DESCRIPTION of PROJECT A. ROCKERY DESIGN for : Parklane Ventures B. PROJECT NAME . . . . : Heritage Woods Rockeries C. PROJECT NUMBER . . . : 2148 D. LOCATION OF ROCKERY : Base of slope behind Lots 52 to 58 E. DESIGN TRIAL NUMBER 2 F. DATE of TRIAL 11-26-1996 DESCRIPTION of ROCKERY ---------------------- A. SHAPE of SOIL BEHIND ROCKERY 1. SHAPE of SOIL ADJACENT to ROCKERY ANGLE of SLOPE VARIES from 0 to 35 degrees (a) VERTICAL HEIGHT of SLOPE VARIES from 0 to 20 ft 2. SLOPE ABOVE ROCKERY a. ANGLE of SLOPE (p) . . . . . . . . . . = 18 deg b. HEIGHT of SLOPE (V2). . . . . . . . . . = 13 ft B. NO SURCHARGE LOADS BEHIND ROCKERY C. SLIDE PLANE ANGLE (0) TRIALS are CONDUCTED at 10 INTERVALS ----------------------- -------------------------------------- SOIL DESIGN PARAMETERS A. ACTIVE DRIVING SOILS a. UNIT WEIGHT (UW) . . . . . . . . . . . - 120 pcf b. COHESION (C) . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 psf c_ INTERNAL FRICTION (t) . . . . . . . . 35 deg B. PASSIVE.RESISTING SOILS a. UNIT WEIGHT (UWp) . . _ . . . . . = 120 pcf b. COHESION (Cp) . . . . . . . . . . . . - 200 psf c. INTERNAL FRICTION (gyp) . . _ . . . . . = 30 deg C. BEARING CAPACITY of SUPPORTING SOILS _ _ . . . = 4000 psf ROCKERY DESIGN PARAMETERS VERTICAL HEIGHT of ROCKERY VARIES FROM 0 to 20 ft (V1) TILT of ROCKERY from VERTICAL VARIES from 0 to 35 deg (a) MINIMUM THICKNESS AT TOP (THmin) . . . . . . . . = 2.0 ft MAXIMUM THICKNESS AT TOP (THmax) . . . . . . . . = 4.0 ft DENSITY of ROCK (Dr) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 160 pcf % MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE VOIDS (V%) . . . . . . . . . . = 20 % FRICTION FACTOR for ROCK on ROCK (fr/r) . = 0.60 FRICTION FACTOR for ROCK on SOIL (fr/s) = 0.40 FRICTION FACTOR for SOIL on ROCK (fs/r) _ = 0.30 DESIGN SAFETY FACTOR (SF) . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1.70 co 3 v x T m 3 -o -O rn � R < X x II m m x 7C O N S m y x � Z u A 11 11 X II 11 X O 'O M V V P tr VI i` W N N N N N N N N r N Vt •O W V O A W IV VI 'O W V W O O O O O O O O 11 _ _ n N N N N N N < 11 r N 3 11 T C3C C2C Z 3 3 2 N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O It ~ ILn y W O W V N -+ 'O W V 6 IV 0 0 0 0 0 m 11 K O S 0 0 0 7 P S 11 Y r 'O W W V V P ut VI W N N N N N N O O iI O N A A X, < N 3 II •.. K m m m m D O O O A O V P 3� N •O 01 v wI r W W N + O •O N p. O P N O W OX O N P W O V N = W W A W = 11 A 1 0 j 'O W j w r W N i v W 'O V 'O W O r r W w 'O O n 111 11 I t7 T T S S (] C T H H A A r x= 'O W V V P 0-tr ut r W N N N N N N N N A0 N r < 7DC Z 2 m 0 m m m P to O A 'O A W W V N P A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f7 li O N N m li o< C O S V O0 0~ A A A A W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N N N A KZI! II K O ' O W O' O C. w O O O O O O 14 — . pp 3 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl AI cO'7 [O'f A I„1 In W N 0 'O V P r w 0 'O W P W 0'o 0 0 0 = m K U \ 1 N S 1O'1 O m m (0) M r a !7 A n K K A N N O O 'O 'O W V V P VI AN W N N N N N O N O 1� y K O N K ..• ... li 7 O O J J ./ •/. W N O 'O W j P ut A W N II U V N C II A ll O O A V 'O O �• O A A 9 VI VI W W W O` r P N V1 •n A O N P - O W VI N VI VI O m P W P A m N P O N m li A f0! OBI N= L= 'O W W VN. .•. r 11 m r T~~ N V N W W W A 'O A •O ut 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ik O 11 < AII W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 11 K N y Ap C z n O' VI W+ O W V VI A N— O O O O O O O O O O • Z 11 li P = C % p M O z 3 •-. N N O O O O O O O O O O N N lA W 0 W V VI i� N O 'O V A N O O O O O O m j K 111I _ \ O Z A N 0 D~ S 11 O C N O W N O 'O 'O W V V P VI W W W W W N N N O O 11 m D N m A w o m 0 0 7 = A `O W N W ut V N W ut N O V VI N VV 'O r W `O N •O W W N a, VI A X n !! L'f r W O O• N- V O' O W W W •O N W N VI V A N O r W N P O N N O m O 2 O > O x N At K L, GI V V N P P VI ut VI A r N N N NN N NN N N •O .O .N r i■■# O W A O P W O P N O O O O O O ' OQ O II11 1 r •�• y A O < O S O 7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N A W N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • < T Z a D C'1 V A A N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 11 z x O m K N 'O W P \ ut 2. M W N N � 0 0 'O W W V W A A A A W W W N N O • O A = O 'O V P P Vi A W N N N_ — —— 11 Ic li R W W O W N N O O V W W N V Nn >R II JO m W VI W VI 'O O' w 0' O 2" W N P O 11 ' O A 3 z K cl ~ N O K O p Z N P P N VI W A A A N N N N N N N N N N N N N to W VI N W VI O O O O O O O O O O O O O ' r O O, >� 2.m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N o 0 o O O o 0 o O o o 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 •_ < X 11 O m }11II1 W O K y y N N N N -• � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �C !I IIIFIIIIt N O A A N 'O W 0,VI W W O V VI N O O O O O O O O • K I O D n j f 52333 y K O W W N O •O `O P P P VI V1 A A A W W w N O O II A O W 11 X H i O `O mm V P vI VI A r w N N N VI N O VI C A 11 pp 7C �• m 3 A i� A A O' V O N O V V N 'O O VI W W v W VV O V VI 'O W W N P -• ut 7C II e'. S T CDW ut N 'O N 'O N a,O A C. N O' O m 2 I A C] C N T 2 T N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r N A I p D O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N < m z A 0 0 0 0 0 0 I0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N z p m O� m O K N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O m II N \ N -I m W O W V V r N 'O P r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < OK A 1i J D A A r OIt A W W N 'O W W V V P P P VI VI 2' A W W N O O S 7C W V P VI VI A W W W N N N N •+ = 11 lC T N V r'pO i W W N Vp. N • 7C 11 3 O m ' loll 'O 0 V P twil A 'VO W VI O 'O W VI N V1 N O N VI W N P G A Oo N P 0 . 11 ' S D v C N 11 A N N NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N r T o .o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1114 0 IV N N N N N N N N 1V N N N H 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O A J 11 V A • N— 'O P A 'O V VI w+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • K III \ O 0 A W N N 0 0 'O 'O W W V P O' W VI A W W N O • S O A VI VI A A W W W N N N N �• EI C 11 i [O'1 iC ITTW O A O V r W VI N W VI w O V VI N O V VI N P O 'O P VI N O O •O 9 O A 'O W W N N A N A N A V O W A W N P O r W N P O • A 11 M 1 1 A K N II 1 • N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r 11 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O • O 11 IqI 1 N N N G I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O pN I I A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m n\ N VI W + 'O V W V V P VI VI N 'O p. W O W U W O V VI N O V O' V V P O A W W N P gWO W P w V O N Of 'O N P O A W N P O A& N P O 11 Q X m 0 M O 0 A 1�•�m••J� I r 0 O � z Y I 0 O z O z cn 0 Ln 0 r n n 0 z m Ln D z n m D u7 c n a rn u u T R D � m n 71,mFD mac tIG 00m Sv mLn S z 0 z 0 11 0 G m z c z D 0 0 moo n — D zzr On 0 m g ;o 71�m �n u, m — m m Ln -n v m u7 z m S 0 m S 3 C/) p GJ me z CA O 0 m Z] n O z N C 0 m 0 70 O C) m m C X m V • m cn G) z C N 0 O z cn C n 1 m a O 0 7 m FIGURE 7 EXAMPLE CONSTRUCTED ROCKERY HORIZONTAL DISTANCE Do - ANGLE of TILT BACK IMPERVIOUS SOIL :.MIR,It e y. .. - ... r FILTER SOIL Q or FILTER FABRIC }•fit, -' k •S"�'ti, r . . NATURAL SOILSI: or FILL SOILS PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE SLOPED to DRAIN NOTES: o� 4a�VRN Oyr�R �Ot � �55 G QO . 1. CRUSHED ROCK IS TIGHTLY PACKED TO HOLD NATURAL OR FILL SOILS IN PLACE, AND TO SUPPORT THE ROCKS TO PREVENT SHIFTING. 2. THE FILTER FABRIC IS WRAPPED UNDER THE DRAIN PIPE AND BEHIND THE CRUSHED ROCK. 3. THE NATURAL SOILS MUST HAVE THE BEARING CAPACITY TO SUPPORT THE ROCKERY. 4. THE KEY MUST BE THE REQUIRED DEPTH TO RESIST LATERAL MOVEMENT AT THE BASE OF THE ROCKERY. 5. FILL SOILS MUST BE PROPERLY COMPACTED TO REDUCE LATERAL PRESS.IJRES ON THE ROCKERY, TO PREVENT SHIFTING, AND TO LIMIT WATER CONTENT. interoffice MEMORANDUM _ Federal Way Dept. of Public Works Development Services Division To: Jim Harris, Planning From: GARY BARNETT Subject: Heritage Woods Tracts H and J Fill and Grade (SEP97-0001, UPR97-0003) Date: February 3, 1997 Public Works has the following comments regarding the proposed filling of these lots: 1. Recognize that the construction of this wall will use and affect the lower property, Common Areas of the plat that are designated buffer areas. To mitigate impacts to these sensitive areas owned by the Homeowner's Association the following actions are recommended: a) identify construction access route and restrict equipment to those areas b) enhance the native growth and buffer functions of the construction zone by planting native trees (deciduous and evergreen) and understory materials (salal, fern, bushes) that all have habitat value for food, foraging, cover. The planting plan should approximate the native preexisting mature second growth forest conditions. c) receive construction easement or similar legal access to the lower construction zone d) screen or buffer the wall face for visual impacts for users of the open space tracts below the wall. The planting described in lb can aid in softening and screening the visual impacts. 2. The proposed rock wall is described as a retaining wall. Rockeries are not retaining structures, but rather facings. Regardless of the ultimate construction technique used, the wall must: a) demonstrate resistance to seismic and other loads per building code b) capable of accepting surcharge loads from structure above c) be maintainable over the long term d) provide for both groundwater and surface water drainage 3. The existing fill next to road was placed during road construction. The current, inplace condition of this fill should be determined and included in the design analysis. 4. The retaining system design involves soil mechanics and structural design that warrant peer review. The design and construction cycle should be reviewed by a qualified geotechnical engineer. 5. Conformance with items described in Ken Cornwall memo dated January 30, 1997. c. Stephen Clifton, Development Services Manager file pw020197 City of Federal Way Department of Community Services MEMO to Community Development Review Committee Date: January 30, 1997 Case Number: UPR97-0003 Project : Heritage Woods Tracts, H&J Fill and Grade Project Planner: Jim Harris THE BUILDING DIVISION, has reviewed the submitted information and has the following comments: 1. Rockeries are not accepted as structural retaining walls within this jurisdiction. The rockery is only an erosion protection for stable soil that is structurally stable without the stone in place. 2. An engineered rockery design using the friction and overturn resistance between stones is not valid for walls over 10 feet high within this jurisdiction. 3. If a rockery wall occurs at the property line of a residential lot, this jurisdiction will require that the foundation depth for a house be deep enough that the distributed loads will pass below the toe of the rockery. An illustration of the intent is provided is provided as an attachment. 4. Buildings recommends the use of a patented armored face retaining wall system, or a structural retaining wall with stone veneer. The engineering design must included the anticipated surcharge of a house on the soil behind the wall. 5. Buildings suggests that the engineer of record be required to provide structural observation and soils placing testing records to accompany a letter of certification accepting the installed walls. Follow the procedures as outlined in the 1994 Uniform Building Code Section 1702. 6. The memo sent by Gary Barnett on January 17, 1997 suggests actions that the building division strongly endorses. Respectfully, Ken Cornwall Lead Plans Examiner KSC/ksc(KC7UPR03) G Dick Mumma, Building Official Gary Barnett, Sr Development Engineer File: UPR97-0003 J _ J W ov5c FOvWn`k P vVIUHs\175 WNN b/Jb j145-'AzLS'O DvP-r1\)6 �SWIU151ohv 06UbZ.opMEN'" 06 CITY OF 33530 1ST NAY SOUTH Mr. David Morrison Parklane Ventures 31620 - 23rd Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Heritage Woods Final Plat Dear Mr. Morrison: "We F IL, (C(O[Py (206) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210 November 26, 1996 This letter is a summary of our November 4, 1996, meeting and a response to your November 15, 1996, letter. You have requested a letter of approval in principle to your request to modify preliminary plat conditions 6 and 7, which require pier piling construction on lots 52, 53, 56, 57, and 58. Based on the generalized concept of your proposal and the lack of detailed plans and studies, we are unable to provide a letter of preliminary approval. Below is a summary of the meeting discussion and alternatives available at this time regarding preliminary plat conditions 6 and 7. City Council Resolution 92-122, adopting the preliminary plat, identifies that minor modifications to the preliminary plat conditions require process I approval. Your conceptual proposal is depicted in a July 18, 1996, fill and grade plan by Jaeger Engineer. The Jaeger plan includes filling approximately 16,700 cubic yards of fill and a retaining wall up to 17 feet in height behind lots 52 to 58. At our meeting, we identified that the proposal is subject to process I approval to modify preliminary plat conditions 6 and 7. SEPA review is necessary as the fill and grade was not considered under the original environmental review for the project and represents a significant change to the original proposed action. The process I filing fee is $1,313.00 and the SEPA filing fee is $472.00. The process I application must include a fill and grade design, retaining wall design, and geo-technical engineering analysis and report addressing the standards of Federal Way City Code (FWCC) section 22-1286. The geo-technical report must address each of the elements identified in FWCC section 22-1286. The city may require any outside consultant to review your geo-technical analysis. The project applicant is responsible for any outside review fees incurred by the city. In the event the wall is constructed in the currently proposed location, construction equipment and improvements must not encroach into the 100 foot wetland buffer behind lots 57 and 58, Any intrusion, including construction equipment into the wetland buffer, requires process II approval. Other elements to be considered in the project design are appearance of the retaining structure and vegetation removal. A plan must be included showing vegetation to be removed' -and replacement vegetation. David Morrison November 26, 1996 Page 2 Approval of the above items are necessary in order to modify the original plat conditions number 6 and 7. Approval of the process I decision, SEPA review, the design of the retaining wall, and design and approval of the fill and grade plan is required prior to final plat approval of Heritage Woods Division I, if lots 50 -59 are included in Division I. Potential conditions of process I approval would include the following: implementing recommendations of the geotechnical engineer; constructing the individual walls prior to home construction on the affected lots; constructing the walls as a single unit; modification of plat notes as appropriate to implement the modified condition; and vegetation enhancement to mitigate the visual impacts of the wall. The process I review will not provide relief for the height of the future homes on the filled lots. As discussed in the meeting, the height of the future homes is required to be measured from the existing grade. Should the process I application to fill the lots be approved, the building elevation will be measured from the existing (prior) grade. Using the prior grade, construction of homes on several of the lots will require process II height variances. We may be able to process a single height variance for all of the lots requiring a height variance. Alternatively, in order to expedite completion of Division I final plat, the bank of lots numbered 50 -59 may be eliminated from Division I. The subject process I application to modify plat conditions 6 and 7 could be pursued prior to approval of the second phase of the plat that would include lots 50 -59. OTHER ISSUES Enclosed is a list of comments regarding the Transportation Management Plan (TNT) required under SEPA condition number 13. Please address the third and fourth bullet items regarding relocation of the bus stop and the transportation options. Please find enclosed a copy of the November 11, 1996, review letter from Keith Fabing regarding the November 7, 1996, site visit with Roger delMoral and Keith Fabing. Please address the comments as appropriate when developing the wetland as -built plan, and wetland buffer restoration plan. Please contact me at 661-4019 if you have any questions, or if I can be of any assistance. Sincerely, � da—vb�) i Harris, Associate Planner enc c: Gary Barnett, Senior Development Engineer hwoode\1126961hc COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA OF: January 30, 1997 ATTN: Mr. Jim Harris Associate Planner FROM: Lakehaven Utility District SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 2 — Heritage Woods Tracts H & J/Fill and Grade UPR97-0002/SEP97-0001 COMMENTS: No trees shall be planted inside the area reserved for sanitary sewer easement. SEPA comments will be provided by the District's Principal Planner, Mary Ausburn, under separate cover. You may wish to contact her directly at 946-5440. c: MGA By: ��v � (L6 M y E Cossette S pervisor of Technical/Support Services Direct Line: 946-5400 Date: 1 ,50 — 911 KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 39 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT 31617 • 1 ST AVENUE SO. FEDERAL WAY. WASH}NGTON 98003 January 30, 1997 To: Community Development Review Committee RE: Heritage Woods H & J Fill/Grade/UPR97-0003/Harris The Fire Marshal's Office has no comments pertaining to this project. Respectfully Submitted, -n P � _ Q, Greg Brozek Fire Marshal's Office Business Phones: Seattle 206-839-6234 Tacoma 206-927-3118 FAX: 206-946-2086 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF CO DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 1997 TO: Community Development Review Committee (CDRC) Members Stephen Clifton, Public Works Development Services Manager Dick Mumma, Building Official Mary Cossette, Supervisor of Technical Services, Lakehaven Utility District Jerry Thorson, Fire Marshal, KC Fire District #39 FROM: Jim Harris, Associate Planner PROJECT PLANNER: Jim Harris PHONE 661-4019 PLEASE RESPOND BY: Application review on January 30, 1997 FILE NUMBER: SEP97-0001, UPR97-0003 PROJECT NAME: Heritage Woods Tracts H & J Fill and Gradb Proposal PROJECT ADDRESS: 284XX Block of Military Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to fill approximately 16,700 cubic yards of material on and near steep slope areas of Tracts H and J in Division I. The preliminary plat approval required pier piling construction on the subject parcels, and this is a request to modify preliminary plat approval conditions # 6 and 7 to allow filling the lots. ZONING: RS 7.2, RS 9.6 PROJECT PROPONENT: David Morrison, Parklane Ventures Inc. (206) 946-3652 DRCMEMOHWO