Loading...
13-102511 (2)CITY of CITY HALL *L Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal (253) 835-7000 www atyofi ederalway. com June 25, 2013 Mr. Eric Labrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC i tr 33400 8`" Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: File #13-102511-00-UP; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Progressive Claims Office, 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Labrie: The Community and Economic Development Department is in receipt of your Use Process IV application and environmental checklist submitted June 7, 2013. The proposed improvements include the construction of a new 16,608 square -foot office building, stormwater facility, road/utility construction, and temporary encroachment into a wetland buffer. Your proposal requires Use Process III and Use Process IV approvals pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.240.080 and 19.175.040(6), respectively. The remainder of this letter outlines procedural steps as the department begins formal review of the application. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION The Process IV application is deemed complete as of June 25, 2013. This determination of completeness is based on a review of your submittal relative to applicable requirements referenced within FWRC 19.15.040, "Development Application Submittal Requirements." A 120-day time line for reviewing the environmental checklist and Master Land Use application has started as of this date. The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line will be stopped any time the city requests corrections and/or additional information. You will be informed of the status of the 120-day time line when you are notified in writing that corrections and/or additional information are needed. PUBLIC NOTICE The combined Notice of Application and anticipated DNS will be distributed within 14-days of this letter as follows: (1) one notice will be posted at the subject property; (2) one copy will be posted at each of the official notification boards; (3) one copy will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, and (4) a copy will be mailed to property owners within 300-feet of the subject property. The department also has the responsibility to notify other agencies that may have jurisdiction over your development project, or an interest in it. File #13-102511-00-UP Doc. I.D. 63696 Mr. Eric Labrie Page 2 of 2 June 25, 2013 The applicant is responsible for the installation of one on -site notice board along the Pacific Highway South frontage. This sign must be installed on or before June 28, 2013. The city prepared the 3x4-foot notice board and it is now available for pickup at the Community and Economic Development Department receptionist's desk. Following installation of the notice board, the applicant is required to sign and return to the city within five days a Sign Installation Certificate (enclosed). Please refer to the enclosed public -notice :$oard handout for installation instructions. �, to A notice of public=hearu g will be issued at least 14 days prior to the hearing date and a staff report with recommendation will be made available within seven days of the public hearing. CLOSING If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely Matt ew Herrera Associate Planner Enc: Bulletin 035, Instructions for Public Notice Sign Bulletin 036, Sign Installation Certificate c: Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer File #13-102511-00-UP Doc I D 63696 CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RECEIVED 253-8352607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.ci offederalwa .corn JUN 2 8 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS SIGN INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE Project Name: Project File No: 7 + f D2 j LJ Project Address: `SyaO Installed By: _ EKW Date of Installation: Location of Installation: fkv— - � as_ af_ as_ aa. ra m: ": m. �_ ae_ �_ av_ . &- &_ a; i$ i$ p$ i/ i5 is i9 as i9 i9 ifi ifl Ib i�d i$ id i$ lkj Ili =Sov tea- 'iAs 9r �a x�,a >�r =Qv >46r 'Atr ` I aar or or -or "" '"- ",, `,, 'Ir — Wv -", •fir I., — 'W, ,"I 'Wr 1111., 1.] ..r I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the installation standards of the Department of Community Development Service's "Instructions for Obtaining & Posting Public Notification Signs" and that the sign will be maintained until a final decision is issued on the land use action. I understand that failure to return this certificate within five days of posting may result in delays, notice of corrections, and re -mailings at the applicant's expense. Cvow PAA Nl�j Installer's Name Oler"s =nature Date &- -13 Phone Bulletin #036—January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Sign Installation Certificate CITY OF Federal Way July 26, 2013 Mr. Eric Labrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL FILE 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 wwww cityoffederalway. com Email to eric.labrie esmciviI-corn & evan.mann@esmcivii.com RE: File #13-102511-00-UP; TECHNICAL COMMENT LETTER Progressive Claims Office, 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Labrie: City staff has completed the initial review of your June 7, 2013, Process IV Master Land Use (MLU) application submittal package. Site improvements include a new 16,608 square -foot office building, stormwater treatment/conveyance, parking to accommodate 115 stalls, road construction, and landscaping. Utility connections will require the need to temporarily encroach into a wetland buffer. The application was deemed complete June 25, 2013. TECHNICAL COMMENTS Unless otherwise noted, the following comments provided by staff reviewing your project must be addressed prior to issuing the administrative site plan decision and/or scheduling a public hearing for the wetland buffer encroachment. Please direct questions regarding any of the technical comments to the appropriate staff representative. Zoning and Land Use Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com 1. Elevation Drawing — Sheet DD3.1 is not accurately scaled at 1/8=1. Please resubmit a scaled elevation drawing. 2. Exterior Materials — Please provide a color rendition of the building's exterior material. 3. Secured Parking — Please provide details of the proposed canopy structure in the secured parking area. 4. Pedestrian Clearance — Parking lot design criteria (Bulletin #42) requires five feet of unobstructed pathway clearance pursuant to FWRC 19.130.160(2). Please provide wheel stops for parking stalls adjacent to five -foot -wide pedestrian connection on east side of building. 5. Pedestrian Connections — Per FWRC 19.115.050(4)(b), approved methods of delineation for pedestrian connections through the asphalt parking lot include: stone, brick or granite pavers; exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete. Please indicate pedestrian connection materials. i" . 4 7 Me. LabFit July 26, 2013 Page 2 6. Building Facade Modulation and Screening Options — FWRC 19.115.060(2) requires facades in excess of 60 feet and visible from rights -of -way and residential zones to implement at least two of the following four treatments. a. Facade modulation. Minimum depth: two feet; minimum width: six feet; maximum width: 60 feet. Alternative methods to shape a building, such as angled or curved facade elements, off- set planes, wing walls and terracing, will be considered; provided, that the intent of this section is met. b. Landscape screening. Eight -foot -wide Type H landscape screening along the base of the facade, except Type IV may be used in place of Type II for facades that are comprised of 50 percent or more window area, and around building entrance(s). c. Canopy or arcade. As a modulation option, canopies or arcades may be used only along facades that are visible from a right-of-way. Minimum length: 50 percent of the length of the facade and extend at least 6 feet from the building. d. Pedestrian plaza. Size of plaza: Plaza square footage is equal to one percent of the gross floor area of the building, but it must be a minimum of 200 square feet. The plaza should be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. If more than two options are used on a single facade, the dimensional requirements for each option will be determined on a case -by -case basis; provided, that the gross area of a pedestrian plaza may not be less than 200 square feet. Please clarify how the north. east, south, and west facades meet the two - of -four requirement. Wellhead Protection — As the total landscaped area exceeds 10,000 square feet, FWRC 19.185.070 requires a management plan for any pesticide and/or herbicides that will potentially be used for the long term care of the development's landscaping. Please provide an operations and management manual using best management practices (BMPs) and integrated pest management (IPM) for fertilizer and pesticide/herbicide applications. The BMPs shall include recommendations on the quantity, timing, and type of fertilizers applied to lawns and gardens to protect groundwater quality. 8. Perimeter Landscaping — FWRC 19.125.060(9)(a) requires Type III landscaping along property lines abutting rights -of -way. Type III landscaping is defined as a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees interspersed with large shrubs and groundcover. Please add two to three evergreen trees along the Pacific Hwy South frontage requirement of "..evergreen and deciduous trees interspersed." 9. Tree Canopy Requirements — FWRC 19.120.130(2) requires development in the CE zone to provide at least 20 tree units per acre. As the area outside of the permanent easement contains little or no tree coverage, standards will be met via new planting. All trees within perimeter and parking lot landscaping are eligible for tree unit credits. Only the area outside of the permanent easement will be counted toward the tree unit calculation. Please provide a tree retention plan that identifies how the development meets tree canopy standards. 10. Wetland Buffer Encroachment — Please provide a written response to the five modification criteria listed in FWRC 19.175.040(6)(a) through (e). 13-10251] Doc. 1 D. 637T4 Mr_ Labrie July 26, 2013 Page 3 Stormwater and Engineering Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, kevin.peterson@cityoffederalway.com 1. The TIR indicates that Basic Water Quality treatment will be provided. The site lies within an Enhanced Basic Water Quality treatment area. The engineer shall revise the TIR and plans to reflect this requirement. 2. The water quality vault that serves Road A shall be located on the Progressive property. 3. The storm drain outfall locations (Sheet CP-06) within the small sediment pond are not an approved discharge point. The 2 outfall pipes should be tightlined to the storm drain conveyance system on the property to the north of the site. An easement shall be provided for the system on the adjacent property. Prior to any engineering or permit approvals, a copy of any drainage easements shall be provided to the City. If the applicant cannot obtain a drainage easement over this system, a new discharge location will have to be provided. 4. The overhead utility lines that are located on the poles along the Pacific Highway South frontage shall be placed underground as part of the street improvement construction. 5. The landscape plan shall show the planter strip on South 340'' Street (Road "A"). The street trees shown are for a 6-foot-wide planter strip. This is a 4-foot planter strip; therefore, the street trees shall be provided from the list provided on City Standard Detail 3-48. 6. Street trees shall be shown in the planter strip on Pacific Highway South. The trees shall be provided from detail 3-48, listed specifically under `Pacific Highway'. Transportation Sarady Long, 253-835-2743, sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com Mr. Long's comments will be sent under separate cover. Water/Sewer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District, 253-946-5407, basbury@lakehaven.org Completeness Comments —Applicant has completed and submitted to Lakehaven an application for Certificates of Availability, and Lakehaven issued those Certificates on 5/2/13. However, as previously noted, applicant will need to submit to Lakehaven an application for either Developer Pre -Design Meeting or Developer Extension Agreement for Lakehaven to formally commence the water and/or sewer plan review process. Lakehaven continues to encourage owners/developers/applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes (as appropriate) separately to Lakehaven, early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. SEPA Comment — Applicant has not addressed the likelihood for new water main greater than 8-inch diameter in the SEPA Checklist. If water main greater than 8-inch diameter is ultimately required and is not sufficiently addressed in the initial SEPA checklist and approval, a separate SEPA process may be required prior to authorizing construction of any new water system facilities. 13-102511 Doc. I.D. 63714 Mr. Labrie July 26, 2013 Page 4 APPLICATION STATUS As of today, the 120-day review period for the Use Process applications has stopped with 31 days used. The review period will begin again within 14 days of a complete resubmittal of items requested/con ected. When resubmitting requested information, please provide a written response to each of the above - referenced items, four copies of corrected reports, and six copies of corrected full size plans with the enclosed resubmittal form. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed void. The FWRC can be reviewed in its entirety at http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/federalwavl. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. C rely, V 4� Matthew Herrera Associate Planner enc. Resubmittal Handout c: Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District 13-102511 Doc. 1D. 63714 CITY OF Federal January 6, 2014 Mr. Eric Labrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 --1 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Feder y Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com RE: FILE #13-102511-00-UP; USE PROCESS III `PROJECT APPROVAL' Progressive Claims Office, 34001 Pacific Hwy S, Federal Way Dear Mr. Labrie: FILE The Community and Economic Development Department has completed the Use Process III application review of the proposed Progressive Claims Office improvements located at 34001 Pacific Highway South. The project applicant proposes to construct a 17,105 square -foot office building with parking to accommodate 115 vehicles, road improvements, stormwater treatment/conveyance, and landscaping. The proposed stormwater/sewer utility connections are within a wetland buffer which have been determined minor improvements and therefore qualify for Use Process III review. The office improvements and wetland buffer intrusions have been incorporated into this decision. The Use Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application as it relates to the site plan review and wetland buffer intrusions is hereby approved based on the enclosed findings of fact incorporated into this decision in full, and the following conclusions based on those facts: 1. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; 2. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC); 3. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; 4. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal; 5. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration; and 6. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated. The remainder of this letter outlines the land use review process required for this particular site improvement; summarizes the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process; lists conditions of the land use decision; and provides other procedural information. This land use decision does not authorize initiation of construction activities. SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS Pursuant to FWRC 19.240.050, a vehicle insurance claims office proposed within a Commercial Enterprise (CE) zoning district that is not exempt from SEPA shall be processed under Use Process III. The applicant has also requested to temporarily encroach into a wetland buffer for utility connections and reduce the buffer width for a permanent stormwater structure. The wetland buffer encroachment request has been determined a minor improvement pursuant to FWRC 19.175.040(4). Therefore, both the claims Mr. LaBrie January 6, 2014 Page 2 office use and wetland buffer encroachment proposal will be decided by the Director of Community and Economic Development in this combined Use Process III decision. SEPA PROCESS The City ofFedep] gW:ay-cted as lead agency for the proposal and issued a Determination of Nonsignific nce {DNS} of October 16, 2013. Following review of the environmental checklist, the city determiriedithe. mppsal jould not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement would not be required, and no SEPA based mitigation was necessary. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The following conditions are reasonably necessary to eliminate or minimize undesirable effects of granting application approval. 1. As the northwestern portion of the property is adjacent to an RM2400 zone, a 15-foot Type I screen will be required and as a condition of approval will need to be shown on the final landscaping plan with the building permit. 2. The applicant shall detail on the final landscaping plan the number of replacement tree units provided and/or existing tree unit credits within the permanent easement. The applicant will be required to meet the minimum 20 tree units per acre onsite or provide offsite mitigation or pay a replacement fee as authorized by FWRC 19.120.140. 3. The applicant shall implement the buffer enhancement plan prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. which includes but is not limited to 624 square feet of enhancement and five-year monitoring/maintenance period and annual reports submitted to the city for each monitored year. Due to the small size of enhancement area, the performance bonding and third party review of monitoring reports that were specified in the enhancement plan will not be required. BUILDING PERMIT & ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS This Process III land use decision does not constitute a building permit or authorize clearing/grading activities. The applicant shall obtain building permits and engineering review for construction activities from the Community and Economic Development Department and Public Works Department. REQUESTS FOR CHANGE OF VALUATION Any affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes, not withstanding any program of revaluation. APPROVAL DURATION Unless modified or appealed, this site plan approval is valid for five years from the date of issuance of the decision. Time extensions to the decision may be requested prior to the lapse of approval following the provisions listed in FWRC 19.15.110. APPEALS The effective date of issuance is three calendar days following the date of this letter, or January 9, 2014. Pursuant to FWRC 19.65.120, this land use decision may be appealed by any person who submitted written comments or any person who has specifically requested a copy of the decision. Any appeal must be in the form of a letter delivered to the Community and Economic Development Department with the established fee and within 14 days after the effective date of issuance of this decision, or January 23, 13-102511 Doc. I.D. 64379 Mr. LaBrie January 6, 2014 Page 3 2014. The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the factual findings and conclusion of the Director disputed by the person fling the appeal. CLOSING This land use decision does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, at 253- 835-2638 or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Isaac Conlen Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director enc: Exhibit `A' Statement of Findings and Conclusions Exhibit `B' Approved Site Plan Exhibit `C' Approved Buffer Enhancement Plan c: w/ Findings: Lloyd Hara, King County Assessor, 500 4t' Ave, #ADM-AS-0708, Seattle, WA 98104 Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District 13-102511 Doc. LD 64379 crry OF Federal Way Exhibit A Statement of Findings and Conclusions Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65 `Process III Project Approval' Progressive Claims Office - File 13-102551-UP The Planning Division hereby presents the following analysis to the Director of Community and Economic Development pursuant to content requirements of the Process III written decision as set forth in FWRC 19.65.100(4). FINDINGS 1. Proposal — The project applicant proposes to construct a 17,105 square -foot office building with parking to accommodate 115 vehicles on a vacant Commercial Enterprise (CE) zoned 8.3-acre site. The proposal includes road improvements, stormwater treatment/conveyance, and landscaping. Utility connections will require encroachment into a wetland buffer and the required Use Process III approval for minor improvements within wetland buffers is incorporated into this decision. 2. Existing Site Conditions — The subject property is a single tax parcel identified by the King County Assessor as 202104-9051, approximately 8.3 acres in size and located at 34001 Pacific Hwy South. The site is vacant and contains a permanent easement for the Kitts Corner Regional Stormwater Facility on the western portion of the property. The eastern (developable) portion of the property is generally topographically flat with low lying pasture type vegetation. As shown on the 1973 Soil Conservation Service Survey of King County, the site contains Everett Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam material (EwC) with 0-6 percent slopes. The geotechnical analysis has indicated the site contains predominately loose to medium dense fill overlying an alluvial deposit. Adjacent streets and zoning designations (respectively): o Pacific Highway South o Commercial Enterprise (CE) — South, East & West; Multi -Family Residential (RM2400) - Northwest; Commercial Business (BC) — North Stormwater — Pursuant to thresholds set forth in FWRC 16.25.020(2)(b), full drainage review is required_ The applicant has proposed a plan for post development drainage on the site to be picked up via catch basins and conveyed in a series of pipes to the Kitts Comer Regional Stormwater Facility located on the permanent easement in the western portion of the property. Stormwater that is picked up from pollution generating surfaces will be treated first in a storm filter vault located on the northwest portion of the developed area. A separate oil control facility will be used for the "high use" area where longer term vehicle storage is also proposed. 4. Bulk Limitations —Vehicle related services located in CE zones are subject to dimensional limitations prescribed in Use Zone Chart 19.240.050. Standards have been met per the following analysis. a. Required Yards —The required yards are 20-foot front; 20-foot side yard along residential zones; 10-foot side yard along other zones; and 10-foot rear yard. The proposed improvements contain the minimum following yards: i. Front (east) yard— 60 feet ii. Side (north) yard— 102 feet iii. Side (north/residential) yard— Approximately 280 feet iv. Side (south) yard— 84 feet v. Rear (west) yard — +600 feet b. Height— The highest point of the proposed structure is 28.5 feet above average building elevation, therefore meeting the permitted outright height of 40 feet. This height was determined via the following analysis using Average Building Elevation (ABE) pursuant to FWRC 19.05.010: Using the topographic survey to obtain ABE with existing elevations (306.5ft) and the civil sheet to obtain the proposed final floor elevation (305.5ft), staff has determined the ABE reference datum to be 305.5ft as it is the lowest elevation on a relatively flat building envelope area. Height of the structure was measured from the 305.5ft ABE to the top of the highest point of the flat roof (north elevation parapet) — 334ft resulting in the 28.5ft calculation. c. Lot Coverage — No defined lot coverage or impervious surface maximum is prescribed for vehicle service uses in CE zones. Approximately 35,376 square feet of the site will be impervious, encompassing the building footprint, parking/driveway areas, and pedestrian amenities. The remaining 7+ acres will be landscaped and the western portion of the property will remain in its existing condition under permanent easement. 5. Community Design Guidelines — As detailed below, the project embodies site and building design principles consistent with requirements of the Community Design Guidelines (FWRC Chapter 19.115). a. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) i. Completed CPTED checklist. ii. Entrance in full view of street. iii. Plaza in location that is easily observed. iv. Direct pathways. v. Lighting exceeds IES minimum average. vi. Landscaping does not obstruct natural surveillance. b. Surface Parking i. Adequate internal lot landscaping. ii. Wheel stops provided within stalls adjacent to pedestrian pathways/connections less than six feet in width. iii. Loop access through parking lot minimizes vehicle turning movements. iv. Single driveway is located an adequate distance from pedestrian pathway and does not impede pedestrian circulation. c. Pedestrian Circulation and Public Space i. Primary building entrance is clearly visible from new South 340`l' Street right-of-way. ii. Pedestrian connection from adjacent public sidewalk to building entrance. iii. Connection through parking lot delineated with stamped colored concrete. iv. Pedestrian plaza with seating and landscaping located outside primary building entrance. v. Pedestrian pathway separated by curb located along northern portion of building foundation. vi. Bicycle rack located on north elevation. Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 2 Progressive Claims Office File 13-102551-UP/n«. I.D. 64369 d. Service Areas and Site Utilities i. Garbage enclosure located in rear of building and positioned for minimum truck taming movements. ii. Enclosure walls and gates are consistent in color, material, and architecture as building, with additional landscape screening. iii. Transformer is located on side of building and does not interfere with a landscaped area and does not obstruct views of signs, driveways or pedestrian areas. Building FaVade Modulation and Screening — All building facades that are both longer than 60 feet and are visible from either a right-of-way or residential use or zone shall incorporate " two of four" facade treatments. Options used must meet stated dimensional standards; except, if more than two are used, dimensional requirements for each option will be determined on a case -by -case basis. All four facades are subject to the two of four as the facades are greater than 60 feet in length and visible from Pacific Highway South or the residential zone to the north. Proposal meets requirements per analysis below. i. North Fagade: • Alternative method - Vertical offset of 1.75 feet at building midsection, feature wall with parapet and vehicle canopy offset meet intent of facade modulation requirements. Pedestrian plaza >200sf ii. South Facade: • Alternative method - Vertical offset at building midsection on eastern half of facade and one offset 70 feet in depth meets intent of facade modulation. • Horizontal modulation 2 feet deep with widths <60 wide on western portion of the facade. • Type II foundation landscaping 8 feet wide along western portion of facade. iii. East Facade: • Alternative method - Vertical offset at building midsection on northern half of facade and one offset 75 feet in depth meets intent of facade modulation requirements. • Type 11 foundation landscaping 8 feet wide along southern portion of facade. iv. West Facade: • Canopy >50 percent of building facade and visible from new South 340�' Street ROW. v Alternative method - Modulation >2 feet in depth but longer than 60 feet, canopy offset 48 feet in depth and vertical offset between curtain wall and brick portion of building meet intent of facade modulation requirements. f. Building Articulation & Scale i. Curtain wall contains trim type material. ii. Architectural overhangs, projections and setbacks. iii. Varied rooflines with parapet and canopy. iv. Building incorporates material variations such as curtain wall, two brick varieties, metal panels and metal coping. g. District Guidelines — Applicable supplemental guidelines applying exclusively to the CE zoning district have been satisfied as set forth below. Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 3 Progressive Claims Office File 13-102551-UP/no..ID.64369 i. Surface parking is located on the front and side of the building. Pedestrian circulation is maximized through the use of delineated pathways. ii. Entrance fagade fronts and is clearly recognizable from the right-of-way. iii. Entrance is architecturally emphasized with feature wall and incorporates transparent glass. iv. No mirrored or reflective glass is proposed. v. No chainlink fencing is proposed. Perimeter Landscaping — Pursuant to FWRC 19.125.060(9), CE zoning district landscaping standards include Type III, `Visual Buffer' landscaping five feet in width adjacent to all rights -of -way and abutting nonresidential zoning districts. A Type I `Solid Screen' 15 feet in width is required along property lines adjacent to residential zoning. The applicant will only be required to provide perimeter landscaping along the north and south property line east of the wetland buffer. No perimeter landscaping will be required on the west property line within the permanent easement. As shown on the landscape plan, the applicant has provided the five-foot Type III landscaping screen along the south, east and northern border along the new South 340th Street ROW. 6 the northwestern portion of the property is adjacent to an RM2400 zone, a I5 foot Type I screen will be required and as a condition of approval will need to be shown on the final landscaping screen with the building permit. 7. Parking Lot —Pursuant to FWRC 19.240.050, vehicle service uses shall provide 1 stall for each 300 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed building measures 17,105 square feet and therefore 57 parking stalls are required. The applicant has provided 115 stalls, which exceeds the minimum requirement. Parked vehicles will be obscured from right-of-way by the grade change and Type III landscaping along the Pacific Highway South and South 340th Street frontage. The landscape plan indicates more than 3,075 square feet of Type IV landscaping within the parking lot via bulbs. The provided amount exceeds the 22 square feet of landscaping per stall required by FWRC 19.125.070(2)(a)(i)(B). 8. Transportation —The Public Works Traffic Division has determined the 25 new PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed improvements will not cause failures to the surrounding transportation system and a Capacity Reserve Certificate was issued August 22, 2013. A transportation impact fee will be calculated based on the fee schedule in effect at the time a completed building permit application is submitted. Access to the subject property is via a new South 340th Street that will be constructed by the applicant. The property's single driveway access is located on the northern property boundary adjacent to the new ROW. 9. Street Improvements —Pursuant to FWRC 19.135.030, the applicant is required to install the following development improvements: South 340`h Street — The applicant will be required to provide access to the site via South 340th Street. The applicant is proposing to construct full street improvements on South 340th Street west of SR 99 for safe access and will include a 40' paved road with curb and gutter, 4' planter strip w/ trees, 6' sidewalk and street lights in a 66' private tract (Planned Type "R" road). This new road shall be set aside as a private "Tract X" for future right-of-way dedication as deemed necessary by the City. In the event the applicant is unable to obtain adequate right-of-way from the property to the north to Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 4 Progressive Claims Office File 13-102551-UP/n. ID 64369 construct the proposed full street improvements, the cross section will be modified as deemed appropriate by the City. Intersection — The applicant will provide traffic signal modifications/upgrades at the SR 99 and 16`h Avenue South intersection to accommodate safe access to the site. The traffic signal modification will include lane re -alignment, new traffic signals displays, pedestrian heads, signage, lighting, and striping and will meet all applicable standards. Pacific Hwy S (SR99) Frontage — The property's frontage is scheduled for capital improvements that are currently under design. As such, the applicant will not be required to construct frontage improvement but instead provide a pro-rata share of the costs. A 12-foot-wide right-of-way dedication of frontage will be required to accommodate the planned capital improvements. 10. Garbage & Recycling— A single trash and recycling enclosure is proposed on the southwest portion of the subject property's developed area. The enclosure exceeds the 65 square -foot minimum set forth in FWRC 19.125.150(7)(b). Enclosure walls will be composed of utility brick and metal gate that will be consistent with the adjacent building fagade texture. Proposed landscaping along the enclosure walls will augment the screening of the garbage and recycling receptacles. 11. Lighting — As shown on the submitted Photometric Lighting Plan, lighting is provided in all loading, service, and circulation areas consistent with miscellaneous site element standards pursuant to FWRC 19.115.050(7) and meets minimum average maintained footcandles in parking and commercial pedestrian ways as recommended by the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES). The proposed luminaire schedule includes 39 LED fixtures to meet the IES recommendation. 12. Tree Retention/Replacement — Pursuant to FWRC 19.120.130, the minimum tree density for a new use on a vacant lot within the CE zoning district is 20 tree units per acre. The developable portion of the subject property east of the permanent easement contains 0 tree units and therefore the canopy requirements must be met via planting and/or calculation of the tree unit credits within the permanent easement. The applicant has provided tree planting within the perimeter landscaping screen and internal parking lot landscaping bulbs but has not identified on the preliminary landscape plan the number of tree units credits each tree species is afforded pursuant to FWRC 19.120.130-2. As a condition of approval, the applicant shall detail on the final landscaping plan the number of replacement tree units provided and/or existing tree unit credits within the permanent easement. The applicant will be required to meet the minimum 20 tree units per acre onsite or provide offsite mitigation or pay a replacement fee as authorized by FWRC 19.120.140. 13. Critical Areas —The city's critical areas inventory indicates the property is within a 10-year Wellhead Protection Area, Category Il wetland and minor stream.' As required by FWRC 19.185.050, the applicant submitted a hazardous materials inventory statement as a component of the MLU application. The applicant has indicated that no hazardous materials or deleterious substances will be stored, handled, treated, used, produced, recycled, or disposed on site. The applicant has proposed temporary and permanent intrusions within an identified Category lI wetland. Category H wetlands require a standard 100-ft buffer from land surface modifications, structures and other improvements. ' The inventory indicates the onsite stream as major but due to natural downstream blockages south of South 3446' Street, the stream is designated minor. The 50-foot minor stream setback is located further within the wetland buffer. Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 5 Progressive Claims Office File 13-102551-UP/noa. 1,1) 64369 Pursuant to FWRC 19.175.040(4), minor improvements may be located within the buffer from a regulated wetland via Use Process III approval that is based on criteria set forth in (a) through (e) of the cited code section. The Director has determined the proposed temporary intrusion requested for sewer/stormwater utility connections and permanent intrusion for a stormwater structure meets the minor improvement test and meets intrusion criteria as analyzed below: (a) It will not adversely affect water quality; Water quality is not anticipated to be adversely affected as the applicant will be required to implement temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures during construction within the buffer. Such measures will control turbid water from entering the buffer or wetland. The permanent buffer impact (stormwater structure) is relatively small in size (44 square feet) and is not a pollution generating surface. Impacts to the buffer will be mitigated with in -kind mitigation and enhancement providing infiltration opportunities and further lessening chances of water quality issues. (b) It will not adversely affect the existing quality of the wetland's or buffer's wildlife habitat; No adverse effects to habitat are anticipated within the buffer or adjacent wetland. Wildlife habitat within the buffer will be temporarily impacted during construction but is not anticipated to be adversely affected in the short or long term. No net loss of habitat will result as most of the temporary construction impacts will be replaced in -kind by the applicant with the remaining temporary and permanent impacts mitigated via a 2:1 ratio of scrub -shrub buffer enhancement. The mixture of tree and shrub plantings will provide additional habitat for resting, cover and foraging. (c) It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities; Due to the relatively small permanent encroachment, code -based stormwater mitigation and implementation of a 2:1 enhancement ratio no adverse effects on drainage or stormwater retention capabilities are anticipated. The permanent stormwater birdcage structure is a necessary component of the stormwater conveyance system that distributes treated flows to the regional stormwater detention facility on the subject property. (d) It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards; Neither unstable earth conditions nor erosion hazards will result from the proposed buffer encroachment. The applicant will be required to implement temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures during construction within the buffer. Following construction, much of the area will be returned to its previous state and 624 square feet will be enhanced to offset a portion of the temporary impacts and all of the permanent impacts. The applicant also proposes to place a rip rap collar around the stormwater structure that will further reduce the likelihood for erosion. (e) It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the city as a whole. The proposed intrusion is not anticipated to be detrimental to any other property in the area nor the city as a whole as the applicant has proposed an enhancement plan that will mitigate temporary and permanent impacts to the wetland buffer. Encroachment into the buffer is needed in order to satisfy stormwater detention and sewer connection requirements. The applicant has designed the conveyance systems to minimally impact the buffer during construction with a remaining permanent impact of 44 Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 6 Progressive Claims Office File 13-102551-UP/nog. im 64369 square feet. Further, impacts will be mitigated and monitored per the applicant's buffer enhancement plan. As a condition of approval, the applicant shall implement the buffer enhancement plan prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. which includes but is not limited to 624 square feet of enhancement andfive- year monitoring /maintenance period and annual reports submitted to the cityfor each monitored year. Due to the small size of enhancement area, the performance bonding and third parry review of monitoring reports that were specified in the enhancement plan will not be required. 14. Clearing and Grading — Clearing and grading activities are consistent with applicable standards set forth in FWRC Chapter 19.120. Clearing and grading of the site will amount to approximately 5,183 cubic yards of cut and 3,236 cubic yards of fill. As shown on the preliminary drainage, grading and right-of-way plan no retaining walls are shown as a result of grading activities. 15. Fire Protection — The South King Fire and Rescue District has indicated that one new onsite fire hydrant (shown on the southeast corner of the property) will be required to be in service prior to the time of construction. An automatic fire sprinkler system and fire alarm system is required and will be reviewed by the district with the building permit. 16. Water and Sewer — The Lakehaven Utility District has indicated that the applicant will need to extend either an 8-inch or 12-inch water main from Pacific Highway South across the new South 340`h Street which will require a Developer Extension Agreement from the district. The applicant will connect to an existing sewer main on the property which will require a sewer service connection permit. CONCLUSIONS 1. Comprehensive Plan & Zoning — The subject property is within Commercial Enterprise (CE) comprehensive plan and zoning designations. The vehicle insurance claims office is a permitted use in the CE zone pursuant to FWRC 19.240.050. 2. Site Plan Review Process — Pursuant to FWRC 19.240.050, the required review process for the vehicle insurance claims office, not exempt from SEPA, is Use Process III as set forth in FWRC Chapter 19.65. The proposed wetland buffer intrusions are considered minor improvements due to the relatively small scope of encroachment and therefore are reviewed under Use Process III pursuant to FWRC 19.175.040(4) and incorporated into this decision. 3. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) — The proposed improvements exceed categorical exemptions adopted by the city's environmental policy codified in FWRC 14.15.030 and therefore require an environmental threshold determination prior to any land use or building permit approval. The department issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on October 16, 2013. Following review of the environmental checklist, the Responsible Official determined the proposal would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement would not be required. The appeal period for the DNS expired October 30, 2013. No appeals were filed with the Federal Way City Clerk; therefore, the determination has become final. 4. Stormwater Impacts — The proposed development meets criteria for full drainage review pursuant to FWRC 16.25.020(2)(b) and therefore must comply with core and special requirements of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM. The applicant has provided a preliminary overview of how the developed property will Statement of Findings and Conclusions Progressive Claims Office Page 7 File 13-102551-UP/noc. I.D. 64369 provide flow control and water quality treatment on new impervious surfaces. Further examination of the stormwater plans will be conducted by the Public Works Department during engineering review. Public Notice & Comment — Pursuant to the city's environmental policy codified in FWRC 14.15.120, the department utilized the Optional DNS process and issued a combined Notice of Application and anticipated DNS, which was distributed and published in the Federal Way Mirror on June 28, 2013. Distribution of the notice included one notice board posted onsite, at City Hall, at King County Library, and mailed notices to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. A notice of application addendum was also distributed on December 23, 2013, per the above - referenced method after it was determined by the director that the wetland buffer intrusion qualified as a minor improvement and no longer required a Use Process IV decision.The department did not receive written comments regarding the Master Land Use application or the environmental threshold determination during the comment periods. 6. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan — The proposal is consistent with the following policies: LUP3 Use design and performance standards to create attractive and desirable commercial and office developments. LUP30 Ensure compatibility between non-residential developments and residential zones by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. LUP31 Use Community Design Guidelines to encourage quality design and pedestrian and vehicle circulation in office, commercial, and commercial enterprise developments. 7. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Federal Way Revised Code — The Master Land Use application was reviewed and determined to be consistent under the following FWRC titles: Title 14 — Environmental Policy; Title 16 — Surface Water Management; and Title 19 — Zoning and Development Code. 8. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare — No adverse health, safety or welfare impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposal. The Process III request has been reviewed under SEPA; the FWCP; all applicable provisions of FWRC; and construction permit plans will be reviewed utilizing the current International Building Code. 9. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal — No significant adverse transportation impacts were identified by the City of Federal Way in the Concurrency analysis or DNS issued for the proposed action. Through the city's transportation concurrency management policy, the Traffic Division has determined no intersections will fail adopted level of service standards and the traffic impact fee will adequately mitigate new trips associated with the upgraded facility. The applicant will construct a new South 340t' Street right-of-way per city standards and provide signal improvements on the adjacent intersection. The city's water/sewer purveyor, Lakehaven Utility District, has identified the need for a water main extension to be provided by the applicant within the new South 340'h Street right-of-way. Sewer services are available on the subject property and the responsibility of the applicant to provide connections. Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 8 Progressive Claims Office File 13-102551-UP/n« IU.64369 10. The proposed access to the subject pro Verty is at the optimal location and configuration — The applicant will construct a new South 340' Street right-of-way per city standards that will provide access to the subject property. Sidewalks and internal pedestrian connections to the proposed building will provide safe pedestrian access to and from the development. 11. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated — Separation of vehicle and pedestrian thoroughfares decrease the possibility of conflict. Curb -cuts into the facility are limited to one on the South 340" Street frontage. No safety issues requiring mitigation were identified. Conditions of Approval — Staff recommends the Director of Community and Economic Development include the following conditions of approval to the Process III decision: 1. As the northwestern portion of the property is adjacent to an RM2400 zone, a 15-foot Type I screen will be required and as a condition of approval will need to be shown on the final landscaping screen with the building permit. 2. The applicant shall detail on the final landscaping plan the number of replacement tree units provided and/or existing tree unit credits within the permanent easement. The applicant will be required to meet the minimum 20 tree units per acre onsite or provide offsite mitigation or pay a replacement fee as authorized by FWRC 19.120.140. 3. The applicant shall implement the buffer enhancement plan prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. which includes but is not limited to 624 square feet of enhancement and five-year monitoring/maintenance period and annual reports submitted to the city for each monitored year. Due to the small size of enhancement area, the performance bonding and third party review of monitoring reports that were specified in the enhancement plan will not be required. These findings shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. This is not an approval to clear and grade land or construct any improvements that require a building permit or other agency approval(s). Prepared by. Matthew Herrera, AICP - Associate Planner Statement of Findings and Conclusions Progressive Claims Office Date: January 6, 2014 Page 9 File 13-102551-UP/n«. i.n 64369 Wetlalid r Delineation / Mitigation / Restoration / Habitat Creation / Permit Assistance 9505 19th Avenue S.E. Suite 106 Everett, Washington 98208 (425) 337-3174 Fax (425) 337-3045 September 17, 2013 City of Federal Way Planning Division Attn: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner 33325 8 h Ave South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Response to City of Federal Way Technical Comment Letter for Progressive Insurance- Critical Areas -Wetland Buffer Encroachment City of Federal Way staff recently completed initial review for the June 7, 2013 Process IV Master Land Use (MLU) application submittal package in support of the Progressive Insurance Claims Center project. The application was deemed complete as of June 25, 2013. City of Federal Way staff issued a technical comment letter to the applicant (dated July 26, 2013, title: RE: File#13-102511-UP; TECHNICAL COMMENT LETTER Progressive Claims Office, 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way). Wetland Resources, Inc. was contracted by the applicant (ESM Consulting Engineers) to respond to review comments related to critical areas. Within the Zoning and Land Use section of the technical comment letter, comment #10 (only) relates to additional critical areas requirements. The following narrative re -states the original comment, followed by the applicant's response. 10. Wetland Buffer Encroachment — Please provide a written response to the five modification criteria listed in FWRC 19.175.040(6)(a)(e). Applicant's response: The attached Critical Area Study (Revision #1, dated September 16, 2013) now includes a discussion in response to the modification criteria set forth in 19.175.040(6)(a)- (e). See the section titled Impacts and Mitigation, subsection titled Modification Criteria. With any questions or concerns, please call the Wetland Resources office at (425) 337-3174. Wetland Resources, Inc. Niels Pedersen Wetland Ecologist RESUBMITTED OCT 10 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 4ik CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederolwoy..com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I y �Xhereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ® Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other was %mailed ❑ faxed 2013. Project Name ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on lm File Number(s) ) Signature Date J � - K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/10/2013 11:39:00 AM . CITY OF - _ Federal Way AMENDED NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Progressive Insurance Claims Office Project Description: Proposed construction of new 16,608 square -foot office building. Site improvements also include parking to accommodate 115 vehicles, stormwater facility, road and utility construction, and landscaping. The applicant has requested to temporarily encroach into a wetland buffer for utility connections and reduction in buffer width to accommodate a birdcage type stormwater structure. Amended Procedure: The original notice of application stated the site plan review decision would be administrative via Use Process III procedures and the wetland buffer reduction decision would be issued by the Hearing Examiner via Use Process IV procedures. Due to the minor nature of the wetland buffer reduction request and authority set forth in FWRC 19.175.040(4), the decision will no longer be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner and no public hearing will be held. Site plan review and the wetland buffer reduction request will be combined into one Use Process III decision. Vicinity Map A new two -week comment period limited to the wetland buffer encroachment of the proposal will recede the combined Use Process III decision. Please see the Public Comment & Appeals section below for more information. Applicant: Eric Labrie Project Location: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, WA 98003, APN 202104-9051 Application Received: June 7, 2013 Determined Complete: June 25, 2013 Notice of Amended Application: December 7, 2013 Current Permit Under Review: Use Process III (File #13-102511-UP) Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Final Wetland Inventory Report (July 19, 1999); Stream Inventory (November 29, 2001); Geologic Hazards Map IX-5 (October 2006); Technical Information Report; Critical Area Study; Geotechnical Report; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the wetland buffer reduction component of the application must be submitted to the Director of Community and Economic Development by December 23, 2013, at the address below. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the director, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the director's decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 8th Avenue South 2"a floor, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera — Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 Doc. LD. 64626 n O C m n ii m O57 m m "$ Fri 7o N uy 1 1 , v G1 Ol Ol O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N — A A A W w 00 00 00 00 00 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O 00 w O O O O O A A A A A A A A A A A A O O O O O O l0 lO l0 l0 lO l0 l0 l0 c0 l0 O O O FA 0 O O O O 0 O O 0 m (.n l! w N o 00 V U'I U'i Ul A O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 w O O N w A O �o n -n In K-0 -0-0 n O m n v 7C 7-17C Op "I n z m m m D O G) -v m m z 2 Z�> -: C c z cn cn cn ^� N m D O G7 -< --I C O O O O Ro >' 2� m OC n 0 rD 7' Z Z Z D z N m CT (A r m vv) < Z Z v� 0 0 C O m— K= z D m p N O m Ln m pp < z D 0�- m rD(n�Dm m z z m Dm D Z � cn O� r z z cnzzc°Cn v' D n N Z O Dr � n C A D r cn Z fn 7C 0 ;am D m l0 m n u, v O Ln z 0 D m C yr N D r r n \ r0 D O p m m 0 m m m0 C Et D m m m 0 0 w m Gl O m r -0 N D N3 ro C Qo O r D Z NO D 2 r N w W-0 W A A W V O rn A 01 Q A m m m I-+ O W O w OCC 0 Oo 0 0 WN O I-+ w 00 N O O N O m N N 0 A 0 A 0 N 0 WOl co Q N D x n 0 XO O C T� LU N nT W w V r) w r1i ujn W00 w U9 :Fi O cy) D A OWl7 lrn ON F G) O ND 10 LO pmW C) OLn () m N m p m m 2 2 D kD NJ o D z w Z Z m m m m m D y m D m p p D O N m D D r m ;p m f+ Z O m O m p O D O< m z m< O E� D z D :;az D �o D A m SC0 �o : D Qo D D O D m D X 2 p G Z m D N 2> D>>> D X y D D 0{ > D D D D 2 D D D D N L lD w lD l0 l LD l0 lD l0 V l0 0 W LO ALD 'A WAO l I O A O O O O AW O F-� AI--' O O O Q ON OW OW OW In l0 W W w N N V W N A w 4 k CITY Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 vwvw_cityo_f f edera Iway.ca m DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION l hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: Q►ihen� IK Notice or Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pemit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed (fie -mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2013. Project Name �� t File Number(s) 1?a -16d S ) Signature Date 1 - S-1 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /10/2013 11:39:00 AM CITY OF - FederalWay AMENDED NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Progressive Insurance Claims Office Project Description: Proposed construction of a new 16,608 square -foot office building. Site improvements also include parking to accommodate 115 vehicles, stormwater facility, road and utility construction, and landscaping. `ire applicant has requested to temporarily encroach into a wetland buffer for utility connections and reduction in buffer width to accommodate a birdcage type stormwater structure. Amended Procedure: The original notice of application stated the site plan review decision would be administrative via Use Process III procedures and the wetland buffer reduction decision would be issued by the Hearing Examiner via Use Process IV procedures. Due to the minor nature of the wetland buffer reduction request and authority set forth in FWRC 19.175.040(4), the decision will no longer be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner and no public hearing will be held. Site plan review and the wetland buffer reduction request will be combined into one Use Process III decision. Vicinity Map new two -week comment period limited to the wetland buffer encroachment of the proposal will precede the combined Use Process III decision Please see the Public Comment & Appeals section below for more information. Applicant: Eric Labrie Project Location: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, WA 98003, APN 202104-9051 Application Received: June 7, 2013 Determined Complete: June 25, 2013 Notice of Amended Application: December 7, 2013 Current Permit Under Review: Use Process III (File 413-102511-UP) Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Final Wetland Inventory Report (July 19, 1999); Stream Inventory (November 29, 2001); Geologic Hazards Map IX-5 (October 2006); Technical Information Report; Critical Area Study; Geotechnical Report; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for ProJect Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the wetland buffer reduction component of the application must be submitted to the Director of Community and Economic Development by December 23, 2013, at the address below. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the director, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the director's decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 8th Avenue South 2" a floor, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera — Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 Doc, I.D. 64626 Tamara Fix From: Mary Lou Goss <mgoss@fedwaymirror.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 12:10 PM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Legal Notice All taken care of... Mary Lou Goss Office Coordinator/ Advertising Sales Consultant Office: 253-925-5565, Ext 3056 Internal: 02-3056 31919 1st Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 0 - Sound Publishing, Inc. Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit Sound Info On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Tamara Fix <Tamara.Fix cit offederalwa .comp wrote: Please publish the attached legal notice (Progressive Amended NOA, 13-102511) in Friday's (12-6-13) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. Thanks! FILE CITY OF A Federal Way AMENDED NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Progressive Insurance Claims Office Project Description: Proposed construction of a new 16,608 square -foot office building. Site improvements also include parking to accommodate 115 vehicles, stormwater facility, road and utility construction, and landscaping. The applicant has requested to temporarily encroach into a wetland buffer for utility connections and reduction in buffer width to accommodate a birdcage type stormwater structure. Amended Procedure: The original notice of application stated the site plan review decision would be administrative via Use Process III procedures and the wetland buffer reduction decision would be issued by the Hearing Examiner via Use Process IV procedures. Due to the minor nature of the wetland buffer reduction request and authority set forth in FWRC 19.175.040(4), the decision will no longer be reviewed Subject Property N by the Hearing Examiner and no public hearing will be held. Site plan review and the wetland buffer reduction request will be combined into one Use Process III decision. Vicinity Map A new two -week comment period limited to the wetland buffer encroachment of the proposal will pKqqqde the combined Use Process III decision. Please see the Public Comment & A eels section below for more information. Applicant: Eric Labrie Project Location: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, WA 98003, APN 202104-9051 Application Received: June 7, 2013 Determined Complete: June 25, 2013 Notice of Amended Application: December 7, 2013 Current Permit Under Review: Use Process ]II (File #13-102511-UP) Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Final Wetland Inventory Report (July 19, 1999); Stream Inventory (November 29, 2001); Geologic Hazards Map IX-5 (October 2006); Technical Information Report; Critical Area Study; Geotechnical Report; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the wetland buffer reduction component of the application must be submitted to the Director of Community and Economic Development by December 23, 2013, at the address below. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the director, or persons who specifi,calIy request a copy of the written decision may appeal the director's decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 8th Avenue South 2°a floor, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera — Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 Doc 1 D 64626 September 20, 2013 Job No.1770-001-013 RESUBMITTED SEP 2 5 2013 Mr. Matthew Herrera Associate Planner CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City of Federal Way CDs 33325 8th Ave. South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: File #13-102511-00-UP; Technical Comment Letter Response Progressive Claims Office, 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal way Dear Mr. Herrera: Thank you so much for your initial review of the Regional Progressive Claims Office Process IV Master Land Use Application. In your letter dated July 26, 2013 you requested several clarifications and revisions be made to the Proposal. In addition to your letter, we received comments from Sarady Long in a memo dated August 1, 2013. Subsequently, two meetings were held to discuss the comments and establish mutually beneficial solutions for the project This letter and accompanying materials will serve as a formal resubmittal to address the issues as they were raised in the letters and meetings. Below you will find that I have broken our responses into two sections. Section one will address comments received in your letter dated July 26, 2013. Section two will focus primarily on transportation comments and issues as found in the memo from Sarady Long dated August 1, 2013. As a general format I have copied your original comments in italics and have provided our responses in Bold. Section I - Responses to Letter Dated July 262013 In the opening paragraph of your letter you reference the proposed building with a square footage that is no longer accurate. The square footage of the proposed building is 17,105 SF. Please revise all city documentation as necessary to reflect the correct square footage. Zonln9 and Land Use 1. Elevation Drawing - Sheet DD3.1 is not accurately scaled at 1/8=1. Please resubmit a scaled elevation drawing. The scale has been verified and the plans have been reprinted for you. Please find them included In this resubmittal. ESM eFaF dgral Way 33400 BIh Avr 5. Sta 205 ESM Everett 1010 5E Everel Mall Way. Sle 211 Civil Engineering Land Planning Federal Way, WA 90003 Everetl. WA 98208 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture 2:3.030.1113 lei 425.297.99001e1 3D Laser Scanning GIS 9 a'340.0/91,loll Tree 011.i15.41441011Ira www.esmcivll cam 253.030.7104fax 425.297.9901 fax Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 2 2. Exterior Materials - Please provide a color rendition of the building's exterior material. Color renditions of the architect's plans are Included In this resubmittal. 3. Secured Parking - Please provide details of the proposed canopy structure in the secured parking area Details of the proposed canopy structure in the secured parldng area have been prepared and are included In this resubmittal. 4. Pedestrian Clearance - Parking lot design criteria (Bulletin #42) requires five feet of unobstructed pathway clearance pursuant to FWRC 19.130.160(2). Please provide wheel stops for parking stalls adjacent to five -foot -wide pedestrian connection on east side of building. Wheel stops have been added to the plans as necessary to allow five feet of unobstructed pathway clearance. Please see the revised Site Development plans. 5. Pedestrian Connections - Per FWRC 19115.050(4)(b), approved methods of delineation for pedestrian connections through the asphalt parking lot include: stone, brick or granite pavers; exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete. Please indicate pedestrian connection materials. The pedestrian connections will be comprised of stamped and colored concrete and a note has been added to the plans to reflect this. 6. Building Facade Modulation and Screening Options - FWRC 19.115.060(2) requires facades in excess of 60 feet and visible from rights -of -way and residential zones to implement at least two of the following four treatments. a Facade modulation. Minimum depth: two feet; minimum width: six feet; maximum width: 60 feet Alternative methods to shape a building, such as angled or curved facade elements, off -set plane4 wing walls and terracing, will be considered; provided, that the intent of this section is met. b. Landscape screening. Eight foot -wide Type 11 landscape screening along the base of the facade, except Type iV may be used in place of Type 11 for facades that are comprised of 50 percent or more window area, and around building entrance(s). a Canopy or arcade As a modulation option, canopies or arcades may be used only along facades that are visible from a right-of- way. Minimum length: 50 percent of the length of the facade and extend at least 6 feet from the building. Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 3 d. Pedestrian plaza Size of plaza: Plaza square footage is equal to one percent of the gross floor area of the building, but it must be a minimum of 200 square feet The plaza should be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. If more than two options are used on a single facade, the dimensional requirements for each option will be determined on a case -by -case basis; provided, that the gross area of a pedestrian plaza may not be less than 200 square feet Please cla ' how the north east south, and west facades meet the two -of -four requirement In a meeting on August 22"d this requirement was discussed at length. The following treatments were agreed upon by City staff and Progressive: North - A bench will be added the proposed pedestrian plaza. This has been shown on the plans. Otherwise the vertical terracing that Is part of the structure will suffice for facade modulation. East - On the northern half of the east elevation the terracing will suffice. On the southern half an 8' type II landscape screen has been added. South - On the eastern half of the south elevation the terracing will suffice. On the western half of the southern elevation the landscaping will be increased by 3 feet to meet the 8' type II landscape screen. The plans have been revised to show this change. In addition to the landscaping two bumpouts along the wall have been added to meet the fagade modulation requirement Please see the revised site plans. West - No additional treatments will be required. These changes can be seen on the site development plans. 7. Wellhead Protection - As the total landscaped area exceeds 10,000 square feet, FWRC 19.185.070 requires a management plan for any pesticide and/or herbicides that will potentially be used for the long term care of the development's landscaping. Please provide an operations and management manual using best management practices (BMPs) and integrated pest management (1PM) for fertilizer and pesticide/herbicide applications. The BMPs shall include recommendations on the quantity, timing, and type of fertilizers applied to lawns and gardens to protect groundwater quality. An operations and management manual will be provided in Section 10 of the Final TIR for this project The O&M manual will Include a Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 4 section on BMPs for an Integrated pest management plan for fertilizer and pesticide/herbicide applications. 8. Perimeter Landscaping - FWRC 19.125.060(9)(a) requires Type 111 landscaping along property lines abutting rights -of -way. Type Ill landscaping is defined as a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees interspersed with large shrubs and groundcover. Please add two to three evergreen trees along the Pacific Hwy South frontage requirement of "..evergreen and deciduous trees interspersed." Two additional evergreen trees have been added along the Pacific Highway South frontage. Please see the revised landscape plans. 9. Tree Canopy Requirements - FWRC 19.120.130(2) requires development in the CE zone to provide at least 20 tree units per acre. As the area outside of the permanent easement contains little or no tree coverage, standards will be met via new planting. All trees within perimeter and parking lot landscaping are eligible for tree unit credits. Only the area outside of the permanent easement will be counted toward the tree unit calculation. Please provide a tree retention plan that identifies how the development meets tree canopy standards. The proposed development encompasses approximately 3.75 acres on the eastern most end of the total 8.27 acres of parcel 202104- 9051. The area we are worldng in contains little or no vegetation so the applicant will need to plant trees to meet the 20 Tree Units per acres requirement as stated above. At 3.75 acres and a requirement of 20 trees per acre the applicant will have to plant 75 trees. The current landscape plan proposes 104 trees to be planted in the perimeter and parking areas. This proposed number of trees meets the requirement of FWRC 19.120.130(2) and no additional planting Is proposed. Please accept the landscape plans as the tree retention plan for this project 10. Wetland Buffer Encroachment - Please provide a written response to the five modification criteria listed in FWRC 19.175.040(6)(a) through (e). Please see the revised Wetland Report that Includes the discussion of the five modlflcatlon criteria. 5tormwater and EnQineerin9 1. The T/R indicates that Basic Water Quality treatment will be provided. The site lies within an Enhanced Basic Water Quality treatment area The engineer shall revise the 77R and plans to reflect this requirement The TIR and plans have been revised to reflect the Enhanced Basic Water Quality treatment area requirements. Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 5 2. The water quality vault that serves Road A shall be located on the Progressive property. The water quality vault for S 340P St has been relocated entirely onto the Progressive property. Please see the revised site plans. 3. The storm drain outfall locations (Sheet CP-06) within the small sediment pond are not an approved discharge point The 2 outfall pipes should be tightlined to the storm drain conveyance system on the property to the north of the site. An easement shall be provided for the system on the adjacent property. Prior to any engineering or permit approvals, a copy of any drainage easements shall be provided to the City. If the applicant cannot obtain a drainage easement over this system, a new discharge location will have to be provided. It has been determined by the client that the best course of action will be to abandon the plan of releasing our stormwater to the pond to the north. All stormwater for the site and off -site road will be collected and conveyed west Into the Kitts Comer Regional Storm Detention Facility. This change will require an additional temporary encroachment into the wetland buffer for construction Please see the revised site development plans and the update wetland report addressing the additional encroachment A permanent easement over the storm drainage line has been shown on the plans. 4. The overhead utility lines that are located on the poles along the Pacific Highway South frontage shall be placed underground as part of the street improvement construction. This will be deferred as part of the Improvements that the City has planned for Pacific Highway. Progressive will not be Installing any frontage Improvements at the request of the City. Instead, Progressive will be provide a fair share payment for the eventual construction of frontage Improvements. 5. The landscape plan shall show the planter strip on South 34e Street (Road "A"). The street trees shown are for a 6-1oot-wide planter strip. This is a 4-1oot planter strip; therefore, the street trees shall be provided from the list provided on City Standard Detail 3-48. Per your comment, the landscape plans have been revised to show the street trees for a 4 foot planter. 6. Street trees shall be shown in the planter strip on Pacific Highway South. The trees shall be provided from detail 3-48, listed specifically under `Pacific Highway. Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 6 No street trees will be planted In the planter strip on Pacific Highway South as no Improvements are proposed on Pacific Highway. All frontage improvements will be deferred and covered by a fee In Ileu of construction. Water/Sewer Completeness Comments - Applicant has completed and submitted to Lakehaven an application for Certificates of Availability, and Lakehaven issued those Certificates on 512113. However, as previously noted, applicant will need to submit to Lakehaven an application for either Developer Pre -Design Meeting or Developer Extension Agreement for Lakehaven to formally commence the water and/or sewer plan review process. Lakehaven continues to encourage owners/developers/applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes (as appropriate) separately to Lakehaven, early in the pre- design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development This comment has been noted and Progressive will apply for a Developer's Extension Agreement as part of the formal site development process. SEPA Comment - Applicant has not addressed the likelihood for new water main greater than 8-inch diameter in the SEPA Checklist If water main greater than 8-inch diameter is ultimately required and is not sufficiently addressed in the initial SEPA checklist and approval, a separate SEPA process may be required prior to authorizing construction of any new water system facilities. The SEPA Checklist has been updated to reflect the possibility of a new water main of 8 Inches In diameter or larger. Please see the revised SEPA Checklist Section 11-- Responses to Traffic Memo Dated August 1 2G13 1. Provide conceptual S 340th Street alignment and how it would extend north in the future to connect with 13th Pl S and S 336th Street intersection. As shown, it appears that the proposed road would impact the existing detention pond on the west side of the property and may not align with the Federal Way Village's conceptual design. A conceptual alignment was submitted to the City of Federal Way In the meeting that took place on August 22, 2013. In a follow up email dated August 23, 2013 from Kevin Peterson, It was determined that a 185 foot radius with a 25 mph design speed would be acceptable to the City. Progressive accepts that alignment and has confirmed the alignment with Federal Way Village. Please see the revised site development plans. 2. The new S 340th Street road west of SR 99 would need to remain as a private street until such time the property to the north develop. The new road shall be set aside as a Tract Xm until such time the property to the north develop or as deemed necessary by the City to be deeded. Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 7 A formal request is being submitted with this letter requesting that the City accept the dedication of S 340m Street at this time. Pending approval of this request the plans reflect that S 3400 St will be dedicated and not set aside as a Tract "W'. 3. Signal improvement at SR 991S 340th St intersection - The SR 99 Phase 5 TIP project from S 340r'' Street to S_356th Street is currently under design. Any improvements to this intersection may need to be reconstructed as the preferred option has not been determined yet As such, the city is proposing two options to minimize improvement cost to applicant and still preserve full access onto SR 99. 1) OPTION A (Recommended) - Limited access at the SR 991S 340th Street intersection and a new full access driveway south of the intersection. Under this option, access at the signalized intersection would be limited to right -in and right -out and westbound in from 16th Ave S only. There will be minor signal modification at SR 991S 340th St intersection to be designed and constructed by the applicant Please note, the new driveway on SR 99 may be restricted to right -in and fight -out or close -off in the future with the completion of the SR 99 Phase 5 HOV project 2) OP77ON B - Full signal modification at the SR 991S 340th Street intersection with no new southerly driveway access onto SR 99. This option would require considerable signal modification to all applicable standards and will be constructed by the applicant as well. Upon further review of the two options and based on discussions with the City, Progressive would like to proceed with Option B. Full signal modifications are being prepared and will be submitted to the City and WSDOT. Recognizing that the improvements could potentially be removed as part of the future SR 99 plans, Progressive will make some efforts to position signals In a way that would allow the maximum potential for being Incorporated Into future designs. It Is understood that with the full signal modification the site will have full access from all directions In and out off of Pacific Hwy and 1 S"' Ave S. Furthermore, it Is understood that no additional access will be necessary onto Pacific Hwy. 4. Frontage Improvement on SR 99 - The required frontage improvement on SR 99 is part of a larger TIP project (T!P#20 SR 99 HOV lanes Phase 5), which is currently under design and scheduled for construction. As such, the Public Works director has elected to have the applicant fulfill the required frontage improvement (FWRC 19.135.030) obligation by paying to the city the pro -rats share of the costs of the required improvements calculated on a per -front foot basis. Based on the estimated per linear foot cost of $1,406 and 270' of linear frontage, the total pro-rata share is $379,700. This is an estimate only and subject to change. In lieu of using Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 8 the city's per front -foot basis estimate, the applicant may submit the actual engineering costs estimate for the frontage improvements to the Public Works Department for review and approval. In the meeting held on August 22, 2013 It was determined that the above estimate was Inaccurate and a subsequent email from Sarady Long dated August 13, 2013 contained a revised draft frontage Improvement cost estimate. Progressive recognizes the draft frontage Improvement cost estimate provided by the City as being closer to accurate but reserves the right to submit the actual engineering costs estimate for the frontage Improvements to the Public Works Department for review and approval. 5. The signal plan must be reviewed and approved by the City and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSD07). The plans that were prepared for WSDOT have been submitted to Sarady Long for review and he has provided comments to Kevin Collins of Transpo Group. This process Is on -going and will be completed as part of final engineering and desigrL 6. The applicant may be able to receive credit for system improvements along SR 99 to be applied toward the impact fee. Credit request for the value of the dedicated land, improvements, or construction will be determined by the Public Works director on a case -by -case basis. Please refer to FWRC 19 91.090. Progressive acknowledges the ability to request credit for the value of the dedicated land, Improvements, and fee In lieu of frontage Improvements to be applied toward the traffic Impact fee. Progressive will seek those credits as the project moves forward. 7 Assuming a symmetrical cross section, the depicted 12' ROW dedication on SR 99 will fit the planned Type An street Please note, there may be additional ROW impacts with the SR 99 Phase 5 project. We acknowledge this comment and understand that additional ROW could be required by the City for the SR 99 Phase 5 project In the event additional ROW Is necessary the City will compensate Progressive accordingly. 8. Streetlight plan must include power source, service cabinet location, conduit size, j-boxes, line loss calculations, etc. Please see attached streetlight checklist The Streetlight Plan will show all of the above as the project moves through final engineering after the Process IV Land Use approval. Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 9 9. Pole numbering shall be per Standard Drawing 3-39B (Luminaim Pole Numbering). Pole numbering will be provided on engineering plans after the Process IV Land Use approval. 10. Payment of Traffic impact fee payment estimated $82,600 prior to the issuance of Building Permit The TIF may be adjusted to account for the total value of system improvements, including dedications of land, improvements and/or construction provided by the applicant Credit request for the value of the dedicated land, improvements, or construction will be determined by the Public Works director on a case -by -case basis. The applicant must submit the credit request prior to the TIF payment. See FWRC 19.91.090. The traffic Impact fee will be paid by the applicant prior to the Issuance of a building permit And prior to the payment of the TIF the applicant will submit a credit request as needed to account for the land dedications, and fee -in -lieu for the frontage improvements. Thank you for your time in reviewing these resubmitted materials. If anything else is required, or if you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me immediately. Sincerely, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC AEvanann Project Planner Enclosures CC: Sean McDermott 11esm81engAesmiobs11770100110131document"06.doc PROSROTII/E ' Corporate Real Estate 5920 Landerbrook Dr. Building H — L32A401 Mayfield Hts., OH 44124 September 4, 2013 Cary M. Roe, P.E. Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Management City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development — Planning Division 33325 8th Ave. S Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Proposed Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office Dedication of S. 340'h St. Mr. Roe, We are in receipt of the Public Works Traffic Division comments of August 1", 2013 regarding the Proposed Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office. Additionally, we appreciate the time spent by your staff with our developer on August 22" d to further explain the comments and work towards a resolution of all items. Of particular concern is the comment stating that S. 3401h Street will remain a private road until such time our northern neighbor develops their property. This comment came as a surprise to us. When ibis project was first approved in 2006, S. 340"' St. was to be constructed by Progressive and public right-of-way dedicated to the City of Federal Way. Additionally, at pre -application meetings held on June 14, 2012 and January 31, 2013 it was understood that Progressive would construct and dedicate S. 340`' St. At no point was there any discussion regarding S. 340" St. remaining private for any period of time. Due to the expectation communicated during the 2006 project, and at both pre -application meetings we have been in negotiations with our northerly neighbor. They have been cooperative and are a good partner in achieving a full width construction of S. 3401" Street and dedication of such. The negotiations that we have undertaken with our neighbor have not considered S. 340"' St. remaining as a private drive. If S. 340'h St were to remain as private it is highly unlikely that our neighbors would cooperate, which would complicate matters significantly Lastly, in our request asking for your consideration to accept S. 340'h St. we would like you to consider that 1) S. 340'h St. is depicted on the approved Federal Way Village Master Plan as a public street and 2) Progressive Insurance is making a multi -million dollar investment in the City of Federal Way of not just capital and increased employment base, but in public infrastructure. Based on the above justifications we respectfully request that the City rescind this comment and accept S. 340'h St. as a public right- of-way upon completion of construction. We look forward to hearing from you and thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to contact myself at 440-603-7079 or our developer, Zaremba Group, at 216-221-2163 with any concerns or questions. Sincerely, ��ttr Kevin P. McGrath Manager of Development CC: Sean McDermott — Zaremba Group Eric Labrie — ESM Engineers RESUBMITTED SEP 2 5 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS TREE, LOW BLUE JUNIPER, GROUND COVER & MYRTLE BLUE FLOWERS 'T DARK GREY PAVERS RK GREY CONCRETE M BUSHES, BLUE JUNIPER, & MYRTLE BLUE FLOWERS I I..AN PLAZA PLAN SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" WP 2t' Z013 gHiY-' }F �EDERAL VVWY ADS PROGRESSIVE REGIONAL CLAIMS OFFICE 09.09.2013 Y B �`N E N - - - - - - "� eicpAin L NOW[N • x:souxrNs INC. 34001 PACIFIC HWYSOUTH RLBA#7697.12 FEDERAL WAY, WA BALANCE"' BENCH PRODUCT DATA M,l All FORMS+SURFACES BALANCE"' BENCH PRODUCT DATA The Balance Bench is an elegant and durable public seating solution perfect for a wide range of environments. Bold and beautiful in form, the cantilever frame is constructed of rustproof solid cast aluminum. Seats are made from corrosion -resistant stainless steel. Available in backed and backless versions, the Balance Bench is ideal for transportation centers, campuses, municipal spaces or any setting where robust construction and superb design are priorities. MATERIAL & CONSTRUCTION DETAILS INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE FRAME I SEAT ARMRESTS INSTALLATION • Frame is made of solid cast aluminum with • Seats are formed from stainless steel sheet • All benches have two armrests • Balance Benches must be powdercoat finish, with 1.2" (30 mm) hexagonal perforations. that are integral parts of the surface mounted. Anchors and • Standard powdercoat colors are Aluminum • Standard stainless steel finishes are frame end castings. stainless steel mounting screws are included. Texture and Slate Texture. Optional colors from Sandstone and Satin. OPTIONAL SEAT DIVIDERS MAINTENANCE the F+S color chart and custom RAL colors are . Standard powdercoat colors are Aluminum • One or two optional seat dividers • Metal surfaces can be cleaned as available for an upcharge. Texture and Slate Texture. Optional colors from • Due to the inherent nature of metal castings, the F+S color chart and custom RAL colors are per bench are available for an needed using a soft cloth or gloss powdercoats are not offered for cast available for an upcharge. upcharge. Seat dividers are solid brush with warm water and a components. aluminum and are powdercoated mild detergent. Avoid abrasive to match the frame. cleaners. STAINLESS STEEL SEAT FINISH OPTIONS" Sandstone is a High -Durability finish, designated by the "HD" logo below, and is manufactured in a process that creates a work -hardened surface with enhanced resistance to abrasion and wear. SANDSTONE NOMINAL DIMENSIONS SATIN Overall a WINn o o . �a°v ° ❑g a ❑ Overall � Depth ❑vo 0 0 o . i MODELS OVERALL WIDTH OVERALL DEPTH OVERALL HEIGHT WEIGHT SBBAL-72BSS 75" (1905 mm) 23" (584 mm) 32.9" (836 mm) 121.9 Ibs (55.3 kg) SBBAL-72BPC 75" (1905 mm) 23" (584 mm) 32.9" (836 mm) 121.9 Ibs (55.3 kg) 'NOTE: Because different computers, monitors and printers render colors differently, actual colors will vary slightly from those shown here, T800.451.0410 I wvvw.forms-surfaces.com FORMS+SURFACES' O 2013 forms i Surlaces& I All dimensions are nominal. Specifications and pricing subject to change without noQce. For the most current version of this document, please refer to our websde at vrrnv.terms-surfaces.corn. page 1 of 2 1 Rev. 02-04-13 BALANCET"^ BENCH EM:3 PRODUCT DATA Overall _ Width t I 0 o g v opa n o0 0 v WIN o Overall �un v Overall Height 0 0 0 ^e WON oft aA No o Depth DESCRIPTION OVERALL WIDTH OVERALL DEPTH OVERALL HEIGHT WEIGHT SBBAL-72NSS 75" (1905 mm) 20" (508 mm) 24.1" (613 mm) 94.9 Ibs (43.0 kg) SBBAL-72NPC 75" (1905 mm) 20" (508 mm) 24.1" (613 mm) 94.9lbs (43.0 kg) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • Please refer to the Balance Bench Environmental Data Sheets for detailed environmental impact information. • Balance has up to 89% recycled content and is fully recyclable. • Powdercoat finishes are no- or low-VOC, depending on color. • Low maintenance; easy to disassemble. NET PRICING AND ORDERING INFORMATION (pricinq does not include freight) MODEL DESCRIPTION NET PRICE SBBAL-72BSS Balance Bench, backed seat with stainless steel finish $1,875 SBBAL-72BPC Balance Bench, backed seat with powdercoat finish $1,579 SBBAL-72NSS Balance Bench, backless seat with stainless steel finish $1,475 SBBAL-72NPC Balance Bench, backless seat with powdercoat finish $1,179 Seat divider + $75 per seat divider Optional powdercoat color from Forms+Surfaces standard color chart + $200 per color/per order Custom BAL powdercoat color + min. $500 per color/per order TO ORDER SPECIFY: quantity, model, powdercoat color for frame castings, stainless steel finish or powdercoat color for seat, number of seat dividers LEAD TIME: 6 to 8 weeks. Shorter lead times may be available upon request. Please contact us to discuss your specific timing requirements. T800.451.0410 I www.forms-surfaces.com FORMS♦SURFACES" O 2013 Forms r Surfaces(g) I All dimensions are nominal. Specifications and pricing subject to change without notice. for the most current version of this document, please refer to our websile at www,forms-surfaces.com. page 2 of 2 I Rev. 02-04-13 L%%4�h� CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 w►vw.cityof red cra Iway.cofn ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before snaking decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) inust be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This enviromnental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to detennine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions. For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. RESUBMI17ED SEP 2 5 2013 WAY Page 1 of 13 CDS A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Center 2. Name of applicant: Zaremba Group LLC — Attn: Sean McDermott 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Name: Zaremba Group, LLC Attn: Sean McDermott Address: 14600 Detroit Ave City/State: Lakewood, OH Zip: 44107 Phone: (216) 838-6113 x163 Fax: N/A Email: smcdermott azaremba rout .com 4. Date checklist prepared: June 3, 2013 REVISED: September 20, 2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): It is anticipated that the Process IILIV, SEPA review, constructions approvals, and other permitting procedures will take approximately 6 to 8 months. All on -site and off -site improvements will be constructed in a single phase. The target start time for construction to begin will be during the spring of 2014. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to this proposal. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Engineering Report by AESI, Inc dated May 16, 2013 Traffic Analysis by Transpo Group dated May 16, 2013 Critical Area Study by Wetland Resources, Inc dated May 20, 2013 Preliminary Technical Information Report by ESM Consulting Engineers dated May 20, 2013 Page 2 of 13 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. The Federal Way Village project lies directly north of this site and may coordinate with this proposal regarding the extension of South 340th. 10. List any govermnent approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Process IV Project Approval Traffic Concurrency Review SEPA Approval WSDOT Access Permit Signal Modification Clearing and Grading Road and Storm Drainage Approval Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is for a new Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office that will be primarily used for office space. The property is a long rectangular 8.27 acres in the Commercial Enterprise (CE) Zone. The building and parking will be situated on the eastern half of the property while the western half will be protected and retained as a wetland/regional storm detention facility. The office building will be a single story 17,105 SF office for approximately 74 employees and will have 115 parking stalls provided on -site. Primary access will be from Pacific Highway South via an extension of a road (S 340th St) at the intersection of Pacific Highway and 16`h Ave S. Sewer will be collected and released into an existing sewer line that runs north and south through the center of the property. Stormwater will be collected and released to the existing Kitts Corner Regional Storm facility on the western portion of the property. Both the sewer line and the storm lines will encroach into the wetland buffers and will require some mitigation. In addition the project will require the extension of a water main that may exceed 8" in size. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject property is located in the City of Federal Way in south King County. It can be found on the NE '/ of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East W.M. The site is on the west side of Pacific Highway South at the intersection with 16`h Avenue South. It has approximately 300 linear feet of frontage along Pacific Highway. Please refer to the Assessors Map, Site Plans, and Vicinity Map on the site plans. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one : flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Page 3 of 13 The site is very flat in the area that work is proposed. However on the western half near the regional detention facility there are engineered slopes that were constructed as part of the regional stormwater detention facility and sewer main installation. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? According to the topographic survey, the steepest slope on the site is approximately 20% located near the central portion of the property between the regional detention facility and the proposed construction area. The area proposed for development, is relatively flat at 1%-5%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. on May 16, 2013, the site is predominantly loose to medium dense fill overlying an alluvial deposit consisting of loose/medium stiff sand, clayey silt, and silty clay, overlying dense to very dense advance washout sand and gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no indications of unstable soils on -site and no indicators on regional sensitive areas maps. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of proposed grading will be to accommodate the proposed building and associated parking. Filling or grading quantities will be prepared as part of the clearing and grading permit. However, it is anticipated that filling/grading will be minimal. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur on -site as a result of construction activities; however, temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures to be approved by the City of Federal Way will be employed during construction to reduce erosion impacts. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 12.5% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. During construction, the contractor will follow an approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan meeting City of Federal Way standards. Typical measures, which may be employed, include the use of silt fences, straw bales, and temporary storm drainage features. Hydroseeding exposed soils and cleared areas after construction will also reduce the potential for erosion. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Page 4 of 13 Construction: Some heavy machinery exhaust and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment will be produced during the construction phase of this project. The amount of emissions to the air will be minimal and will occur during the actual construction of the development. All equipment will be well maintained and have proper air quality treatment installed as required by the manufacturer. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to reduce dust. Lons Term Air Quality: The primary use of the proposed building is for offices. As such, long-term air impacts would be those typically associated office space land uses. Sources of long-term emissions and odor could include vehicle emissions from increased vehicle use generated by the service center. The additional vehicular emissions in these areas are not anticipated to concentrate and therefore are not anticipated to create a health hazard to the surrounding areas. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No off -site sources of emission or odor will affect this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. As stated above all construction equipment will be in proper working order and regulated for emissions by the manufacturer and local emission laws. Vehicles entering and leaving the site will also be regulated for emissions by state and local emission laws. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to keep any dust from impacting surrounding air quality. 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide naives. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. �-r/ According to the Critical Areas Study prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. and the Federal Way � g inventory, the site contains a wetland and stream complex constructed as part of the Kitts Corner S+� �L u'A.A Regional Detention Facility located on the western portion of the subject property. The wetland is k S J'a.{"` defined as a Category II Wetland and the stream is defined as a Major Stream pursuant to the Federal VoVo Way City Code. The stream is a tributary of Hylebos Creek. ..Y ' 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes the proposal will require work within 200 feet of the above described wetlands. No work is proposed within the wetlands but the sanitary sewer connection and stormwater release point will require work within the wetland buffer. Please see the Critical Areas Study Map prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. for details regarding the impact to the wetland buffer. Stormwater will be collected and released to an existing storm detention facility to the west of this development. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from Page 5 of 13 surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No filling or dredging will take place in the wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Map (Floodplains) the site does not lie within a 100- year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No the proposal will not discharge waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn nor will water be discharged to ground water. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: doinestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the systein(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. No on -site septic or treatment is proposed. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. On -site storm water runoff will primarily be generated from building rooftops, parking areas and associated drive aisles. Storm water will be collected, routed through required storm water quality treatment facilities and discharged to an existing stormwater detention facility to the west. See the Preliminary Storm Drainage Report and Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers submitted as part of this Process IV Site Plan review application. Page 6 of 13 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials will enter ground or surface waters. The proposed site storm water drainage and sewer plans will ensure that all water that is generated from the site will be treated in water quality facilities prior to its release as required by City of Federal Way standards. Best Management Practices will be used throughout the construction of the proposal to ensure that no waste enters ground or surface waters without first being treated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. ZL9m (CGSw The storm water runoff will be collected and conveyed to the existing detention facility in conformance .A Fzo( W-q with the City of Federal Way standards. Please see the Preliminary Storm Drainage Report and Aaw-,,.4. — Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. —X deciduous Ire naple, aspe cottonwoo other X__ evergreen tree fi cedar pine, other shrubs _X_ grass pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plan ' cattail tterc bulrus trunk r,ib� other water plant: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _X_ other types of vegetatio . co c roo b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site is currently undeveloped with minimal vegetation. The eastern and central portion of the site, which is proposed for development, is generally devoid of vegetation other than low -growing shrubs and grasses. The western portion of the property, which contains the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility has vegetation characteristic of wetland areas. The shrubs and grasses in the eastern and central portion of the property will be removed for construction of the building, vehicular driveways and parking areas. The vegetation in the regional detention facility easement area is not proposed for removal or alteration. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known endangered or threatened species on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Native landscaping will be installed along the perimeter of the development area and street frontages pursuant to City of Federal Way guidelines. The vegetation near and around the wetland and stream complex will remain undisturbed except for the 15 foot wide corridor for the proposed sewer connection and storm discharge point. See the Preliminary Landscape Plan prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers submitted as part of this Process IV Site Plan review application. Page 7of13 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: hawk, heron, eagl . son u• other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. This entire region is known to be part of the Pacific Flyway. The Pacific Flyway includes Alaska and the Aleutian Islands and the Rocky Mountain and Pacific coast regions of Canada, the United States and Mexico, south to where it becomes blended with other flyways in Central and South America. However, the site is not known to be used by migratory fowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Installation of native landscaping will provide coverage and habitat for urban tolerant wildlife. In addition, the vegetation within the regional detention facility easement area will remain undisturbed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the needs of the project and natural gas will be made available for the purpose of heating and other needs associated with the service center building. No. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The service center building that will be constructed as a result of this project will meet or exceed the applicable commercial energy conservation consumption requirements in the City of Federal Way and the Uniform Building Code. Page 8 of 13 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. It is unlikely under normal working conditions that environmental health hazards would be encountered. All project -related construction will meet or exceed current local, state and federal laws. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. State regulations regarding safety and the handling of hazardous materials will be followed during the construction process. Equipment refueling areas would be located in areas where a spill could be quickly contained and where the risk of hazardous materials entering surface water is minimized. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? The primary noise source near the project site is from vehicular traffic on Pacific Highway South to the east. The traffic noise along this roadway is not project related or generated, and is not anticipated to greatly affect the proposed project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Construction would occur during permitted construction hours and always in compliance with the City of Federal Way noise regulations. Long-term impacts would be those associated with the increase in vehicular traffic from future employees and customers. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Construction activity will be limited to permitted construction hours and construction equipment will not be allowed to idle for continuous periods of time, which will help to mitigate the impacts of potential construction noise. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current uses of the site and adjacent properties are as follows: SITE: Vacant land and Regional Stormwater Detention Facility NORTH: Undeveloped Land and Regional Stormwater Detention Facility SOUTH: Office and light industrial EAST: Commercial and light industrial WEST: Light industrial Page 9 of 13 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No the site has not been used for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no existing structures on -site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial Enterprise (CE) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial Enterprise (CE) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally critical area? If so, specify. Yes, according to the Critical Area Study prepared by Wetland Resources and the Federal Way inventory, a Category II Wetland and Major Stream are located on site. However, these sensitive areas are located within the regional stormwater detention facility permanent easement area outside of the proposed development area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? It is anticipated that the proposed claims center will have approximately 74 employees. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The project will be developed in accordance with applicable City of Federal Way development and land use codes to ensure the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable Development Regulations in effect at the time of a complete Process IIVIV application. Page 10 of 13 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None proposed. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of the proposed building will be approximately 30 feet high. The principal exterior building material will be metal siding and brick. Please see elevations and materials sheets provided by the architect, Richard L. Bowen and Associates Inc. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Development of the site would result in a change to the visual character of the site for the nearest existing businesses and roadways from that of an undeveloped site to that of a service center. No views will be obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The site plan has been developed to provide a site design layout consistent with the development regulations in place for the CE zone. Proposed design and landscaping consistent with City of Federal Way's development regulations will help to reduce aesthetic impacts. Please refer to the Building Elevations and Design Intent submitted with this application. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed site development will not create any permanent glare to off -site sources. Light and glare produced from this project will be typical of an office building in a commercial development. Light and glare from the site would primarily be during business hours and consist of site lighting and vehicle headlights entering and leaving the property. Please refer to the Photometric Plan prepared by H.F. Lenz dated May 21, 2013. No. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Page 11 of 13 c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Providing the required setbacks of the proposed building from the property lines and installation of landscaping will help to alleviate some of the light and glare created by the new development from the adjacent properties and roadways. The proposed use is consistent with the land use regulations and compatible to the existing adjacent land uses. Please refer to the Photometric Plan prepared by H.F. Lenz dated May 21, 2013. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? No designated or informal recreation opportunities are in the immediate vicinity. No. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. No measures proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To the best of our knowledge, there are no landmarks or evidence of any significant historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural resources known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. If any such historic or cultural evidence was encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work would be halted in the area and a state -approved archaeologist/historian would be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project will obtain access from the proposed new road (South 340"' Street) along the northern property boundary. The new road will a[ign ►vith the Pacific Highway South and 16th Avenue South intersection. Page 12 of 13 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes the site is served by public transit. There is a known bus stop at the intersection of Pacific Highway and 161h Ave S. Bus route 500 is known to stop here. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have 115 parking spaces and will be eliminating no parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, the proposed project will construct full width improvements for a new public right-of-way (South 340th Street) along the northern property boundary, plus frontage improvements and a signal modification along Pacific Highway South. No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Weekday PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed Progressive building were estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation (9`h Edition, 2012). The Progressive office building is estimated to generate 4 inbound and 21 outbound trips during the weekday PM peak hour based on the average trip generation rate for the General Office land use (#710). These trips were distributed consistent with the Village at Federal Way development and added to the S 340th Street- 16th Avenue S / Pacific Highway S intersection 2016 background traffic volumes. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. The proposed measures to reduce transportation impacts include the design and construction of a new public right-of-way (South 340`h Street) along the northern property line. Traffic impact fees will also be paid to offset any impacts to surrounding roads. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will result in a slight increase in need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. This increase in demand will be offset by fees, levies, and taxes required to be paid by the applicant as part of this development. Also the proposal has been designed in a manner that will provide adequate access for fire, medic, and police vehicles. Page 13 of 13 C. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other (please list) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sanitary Sewer: Lakehaven Utility District Water: Lakehaven Utility District Electricity: Puget Sound Energy Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Telephone: Century Link Communications Cable TV: Comcast Refuse Service: City of Federal Way SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. SIGNATURE: Evan Mann, Project Planner DATE SUBMITTED: June 7. 2013 RESUBMITTED: September 20 2013 Page 14 of 13 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL Resubmittal DATE: October 10, 2013 TO: Kevin Peterson, Development Services Manager Sarady Long, Traffic Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: FILE NUMBER(s): RELATED FILE NOS.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS ZONING DISTRICT: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECTCONTACT. Matt Herrera — Planning 13-102511-00.-UP None PROGRESSIVE CLAIMS OFFICE 34001 PACIFIC HWY S CE Proposed 16,608 square foot office structure and related site improvements. UPIII and SEPA ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLC ERIC LABRIE 181 333an ST Suite210 MATERL4LS RESUBMITTED: 1. Response Letter (4) 2. Request to accept S. 340th St. as ROW upon completion (4) 3. Revised Environmental Checklist (4) 4. Revised Illumination Calculations (4) 5. Revised Wetland Buffer Report (4) 6. Revised TIR 7. Pedestrian Plaza Plan (2) 8. Revised Illumination Plan (6) 9. Carport Elevation (2) 10. Floor Plan (6) 11. Revised Exterior Elevation (6) 12. Material Sheet (6) 13. Revised Plan Set (Site, drainage, grading, ROW, Landscaping) (6) CITY Or - Federal Way DATE: August 1, 2013 TO: Matt Herrera FROM: Sarady Long SUB]ECT: PROGRESSIVE CLAIMS OFFICE - (13-102511-00-UP) 34001 PACIFIC HWY S MEMORANDUM Public Works Department The Public Works Traffic Division has reviewed the submitted materials and provides the following technical comments. 1. Provide conceptual S 340"' Street alignment and how it would extend north in the future to connect with 13t' PI S and S 33e Street intersection. As shown, it appears that the proposed road would impact the existing detention pond on the west side of the property and may not align with the Federal Way Village's conceptual design. 2. The new S 340"' Street road west of SR 99 would need to remain as a private street until such time the property to the north develop. The new road shall be set aside as a Tract `X" until such time the property to the north develop or as deemed necessary by the City to be deeded. 3. Signal Improvement at SR 99/S 340"' St. intersection - The SR 99 Phase 5 TIP project from S 340"' Street to S 356t' Street is currently under design. Any improvements to this intersection may need to be reconstructed as the preferred option has not been determined yet. As such, the city is proposing two options to minimize improvement cost to applicant and still preserve full access onto SR 99. 1) OPTION A (Recommended) - Limited access at the SR 99/S 340t' Street intersection and a new full access driveway south of the intersection. Under this option, access at the signalized intersection would be limited to right -in and right -out and westbound in from 16"' Ave S only. There will be minor signal modification at SR 99/S 340t' St. intersection to be designed and constructed by the applicant. Please note, the new driveway on SR 99 may be restricted to right -in and right -out or close -off in the future with the completion of the SR 99 Phase 5 HOV project. 2) OPTION B — Full signal modification at the SR 99/S 340t' Street intersection with no new southerly driveway access onto SR 99. This option would require considerable signal modification to all applicable standards and will be constructed by the applicant as well. 4. Frontage Improvement on SR 99 - The required frontage improvement on SR 99 is part of a larger TIP project (TIP#20 SR 99 HOV lanes Phase 5), which is currently under design and scheduled for construction. As such, the Public Works director has elects to have the applicant fulfill the required frontage improvement (FWRC 19.135.030) obligation by paying to the city the pro-rata share of the costs of the required improvements calculated on a per -front -foot basis. Based on the estimated per linear foot cost of $1,406 and 270' of linear frontage, the total pro-rata share is $379,700 (see calculation below). This is an estimate only and subject to change. In lieu of using the city's per - front -foot basis estimate, the applicant may submit the actual engineering costs estimate for the frontage improvements to the Public Works Department for review and approval. TIP Cost - $18,000,000 ($20,000,000 - $2,000,000 grant funded design) Project Length — 6,400' (both sides) Frontage Length — 270' Cost per linear foot — ($18,000,000) x (6,400 x 2) _ $1,406 Total Cost = $1,406 x 270' _ $379,700 5. The signal plan must be reviewed and approved by the City and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). 6. The applicant may be able to receive credit for system improvements along SR 99 to be applied toward the impact fee. Credit request for the value of the dedicated land, improvements, or construction will be determined by the Public Works director on a case -by -case basis. Please refer to FWRC 19.91.090. 7. Assuming asymmetrical cross section, the depicted 12' ROW dedication on SR 99 will fit the planned Type "A" street. Please note, there may be additional ROW impacts with the SR 99 Phase 5 project project. 8. Streetlight plan must include power source, service cabinet location, conduit size, j-boxes, line loss calculations, etc. Please see attached streetlight checklist. 9. Pole numbering shall be per Standard Drawing 3-39B (Luminaire Pole Numbering). 10. Payment of Traffic impact fee payment estimated $82,600 prior to the issuance of Building Permit. The of may be adjusted to account for the total value of system improvements, including dedications of land, improvements and/or construction provided by the applicant. Credit request for the value of the dedicated land, improvements, or construction will be determined by the Public Works director on a case -by -case basis. The applicant must submit the credit request prior to the of payment. See FWRC 19.91.090. 44k CITY Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 980C3 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www_d ofFederolwa .ea DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION ►, �' �' hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was X mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on �cu•,� 2013. Project Name File Number(s) Signature _ _ Date 13 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 6/28/2013 8:27:00 AM CIW OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Progressive Insurance Claims Office Project Description: Proposed construction of a new 16,608 square -foot office building. Site improvements also include parking to accommodate 115 vehicles, stormwater facility, road and utility construction, and landscaping. The applicant has requested to temporarily encroach into a wetland buffer for utility connections. The site plan review decision will be administrative via Use Process III procedures. The wetland buffer encroachment decision will be issued by the Hearing Examiner via Use Process IV procedures. Applicant: Eric Labrie, ESM Consulting Engineers, 33400 8s' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Subject Property U Project Location: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, WA 98003, APN 202104-9051 vicinity Map Application Received: June 7, 2013 Determined Complete: June 25, 2013 Notice of Application: June 28, 2013 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the city, it is likely that the Responsible Official will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Environmental comments must be submitted by the date noted below. Permits Under Review: Use Process IV (File #13-102511-UP), Concurrency (File #13-102513-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #13-102512-SE) Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Final Wetland Inventory Report (July 19, 1999); Stream Inventory (November 29, 2001); Geologic Hazards Map IX-5 (October 2006); Technical Information Report; Critical Area Study; Geotechnical Report; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, `Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the environmental, site plan, and design review components of the application are due July 15, 2013. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Director of Community and Economic Development, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the director's decision. Comments regarding the temporary wetland buffer encroachment component of the application may be submitted to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Associate Planner Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638 Doc. I.D. 63613 m v m ri N 00 I*' N N m m m m cn m Ln N� N O m O O O O ri N v O ri N O w m N v N O N 0 O CD m O� m O 0 Il 0 O v N 0 o ao m oo o0 00 00 0o ao 0o ao 00 0o ao 00 00 W Ln u rn r� rn d rn rn rn r rn m m rn m rn rn rn rn n a IV a Q Q p a a �` Q Q Q Q a Q Q x a p z x F- x M a~ a g < a a a a a a~ c� z o� W z w> 0 a c 0 0 0 O } 0 =1 0 w v Q u o 0 0 0 Q w w J Q w Ln O Q W W W w Q W a a J U LL Q LL u Ln N H LL LL LL LL LL In a W W Z Z 0 o Q o m Q 2 2 w N H a H K InLLj } Ln Ln 0 O� �:InLu uw U m0aa>i 2 e rn v~i rn O p U D S x H U m > O Q 0 p C7 } O LL In Q z U O Ln v O a w m O N N Ln 2 2 N LL U Ln m 0 M U r, W mm m U M F� N Q m mx E :c COa X(N -1 Nr-I 1.1 N x p N a U X } Q d (>n V�) o O a J U, m N m N m m N :t :t N m O O N 0) i -1 m 0 r-I O O 00 O m 0 0 00 0 lD 0 LD N 0 N LG O -It 00 m 1-1 O O n Q 0 a 0o ri a a-i I, a r-I m-i I,* M a M M N r-I 1, rn N 2 a 0: Ln Y Z O Q 66 J 0 c N !TrN LL W d c 0 u O W LL w Y LU C Z C7 LQL N O O Q LU O U J J N g D U 1= w h O a) } 66 w a Ol Ln z J N a u J Y W Ln N } W m Q J J LL a O Y m J N F a u H U }+ Z p a} N J U a Q Ln u F- p N? w z g Q W z z Q W g v Ln U z 0 Z w Ln F- J Q Y u U O D m O Z Z 0 z> Ln LU-i a H mm LL wLn OJ U �L O L � W H} 0 m Ln LL v O O w 07i a m a O O O O K F a l7 Z m 2 x} 2 W N W N N Ln d a p 0 m Q w w m 11 W H �� J p 0 0 0 Z LL H Y ]C le au 0 a u N U m O't r-I r-I N m N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O -zd, Ln Ln Ln 1, w O ri N m Ln Ln l0 m ri N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri H ri r-I O r-I H O r-I r-I O m m m m m m m m m m m m O O O O O O V V K* 'ct �t -It -zt Kt O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O w w w w w r-I r-I r-I TH r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I m m 't -�T v N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O w w w m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-I 01 m N N N L�j L a-i N N N N N N N N N N N N M M 01 Ol Ol a a W cc:",,N l- 4 L t— w N w u ® LUL-U LLI Z O U 120] June 28, 2013 www.federalwaymirror.com www.nw-ads.com • LEGAL NaTIGE� Continued from previous page durumenls. No IlLoder may wilhdrrm his "a! tjsePracass [V procedures She hour sal for the opening thereat unless I. Applicant: Eric Lahrfe, ESM COOS01111g EnglAeefs. award is detayad tar a period excuedmg thirty JW aa400 Bib Avenue South. Fbderal Way. WA nance and Service. Informational copies of maps, doss. 96003 plans, and specifications are available for review at paled Ine22thday al tune, 2o1a Pruitt! Location: 34001 PaeNic HiChviay South. the Public Works Department, Federal Way City Bates or Publication F2daralWay,►VA g8003.APN202104.9D51 Hail, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, Wash- Daiy,lourrra of Comtnerc¢June22,2013 Application Received: June 7, 2013 Determined ington. Jun t 29, 201a Complete Juno 25. 2013 NaliCe at Application; Bidding Documents are also available for review at Fodorai Way M�rror,Juno 21.2013 ! June 28, 2013 the fat ovring Plan Centers: 3une 28, 2013 Envaonmental Review: Based upon reviev+ of 8 Daily Journal of Commerce, Attn: Plancenter.com, City of federal Way webSteJune22.913 rompletad environmental enaeldisf, and other in- 83 Coiumbfa St, Suite 200, vnvrr.ciryatledafatv2yeamroldsJuy D8,2013 (ormoliorll fin Site With the city. it is ilkely that the Ssatuc. WA 93104 FWM 2028 Responsib:e Oft -of will delermine. that the prop Daily Journal of Commerce Project Center, 921 SW vTtl not have a proboble significant adverse impact Washmgton St, Suite 210, Portland, OR 97205 SUMMONS on the enviranmenl and expects to [slue a Geller - I Eileen UsaP•Wi[son. 1 minafxon of Nonsighiflcance (OHS) tot this pialecl, McGraw Hill, 200 SW Michigan St, Suite 1GOA. You have been sued by Stacey 5teinvramel, tho' The bdtional DNS process In WAC 197.11ti355 is Saat119,WA 9$106 PlainlIII, In the Dismal Court in and for KoalEnai. being We. This may to your only opportunity Ill Valle Plan Center, 10002 Aurora Avenue North, County, Idaho. CaseNoD CV-13.2(S7, Icomrrrenl va the environmental impact, of the pro- €36.PMB3X,10a1Ile, WA 98133 Tile nature of the claim is for breach of a put -•'posed project. The proposal may Include mitipa- Reed Construction Bala, 30 Technology Parkway chaseisala comractdafedJuly 3.2013, 10on measures under ipplicattto codes. and the re- Soulh. Salle 500, Norcross, GA 30092 Any time alter 20 days 1011owing the last publica5'ls"ew process may ioeproorate of requfre mitipalion Builders Exchange of Washington, 2507 Wetmore lion of IhIs sunrmons, Bye caerl may enter a judg-, measures regardtoss 131 whelhar an environmental Avenue, Everett, WA 98201 Mont against you without furlhor Police: irmla i. 'mead slatemeat (E[S] is prepared. A copy o1 the Contractor Plan Center, 14625 SE 82nd Drive. print to Iha! lime you have filed a written miloosd; subsequeal tbreshodd determination for the speclf- Clackarnas, OR 97015 in the proper term, ire[tra rig the Case tip.. and= Ic propose, May be nbleinadupon request. Contractor's Resource Center, 2301 So Jackson aid any required lidng lee to the Cletk of the Cauil Agencies• tribes• and Via public are encouraged to Street, Suite Iat B, Seattle, WA 98144 [PO Box 9OW Coeur d'Alene, 10 838111 (mailing y Wow and comment on thu proposed pmjset and Isg1t P anroom, 26D6 and Ave r244, Seattle, WA or 324 W. Garden Ave. Coeur d'Alima. Idaho 8381C its probable environmental Impecis. EAviranmenlal 98121 Oregon washitt(}tanRrsgR.dom (physical) with a telephone number of (208J446,=I comments must be submiltad by the date halted The City. in accordance wilh Title VI of the Civil 11601 and served a copy 01 your response on Ihv emir• Rights Ant of 1964. 78 Stal. 252, 42 U.S.C. 2000d Plaintiff's attorney of The Law offices 01 Tyler S. Permits Under Ravievl: Use Process IV (File to 24OOd-4 and Title 48 C.F.R., Department of Wirlck, PLLC, 250 Nbrthviost SIvJ. Ste. 107A, a13.102511-UP), Concurrency (Flle iFI3.102513• Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Coemd'AI rw.ID 83814.20&M 1200. CN), and Slate EPViranmen181 Po':iry Act (SEPA) Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally -assisted A Dopy of the Summons and Complain! ran be olr• ThresnoldDalsIMIRuop (fat f13 102512•Sk} programs of the Department of Transpadition is- laineri by eonlaVing either the Clark a1 UM Cowl or as ll4afand IIO n nentRapReqort uired Stuly ories: 1999}', sued pursuant to such Act, hereby notiReB all hid- the attorney. for Platntifl. It you w[sh Seger ass $ oars That it will affirmalivey ensure that in any Lance, you sbould immedelely relax an attorney to Stream lnvenlory (November 29. 20D1); Gaotogie contract entered into pursuant to !his advertise- advise you in Ottemadar, Hazards Mao IX-5 (Oclaber 20081: Technics' InlOf- ment, disadvantaged business enterprises as de- First Date Puhhstied:June28.2O13 matron Report; Crilleal Arta Study; Geoleehnicdl fined at 49 CFR Part 23 will he afforded tuft oppor Last DaEePi triShed Juy t2,20t3 Ropott;and EnvironmentalChecknst. mrdty to submit ti� In response to this invilallon FWM 2031 Development R gtrlalions Used for Project hlitiga- and will not be Mscrlminated against on the lion: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Ti" 14, grounds of rasa. Cater, national' origin, or sex in' •EPviranmentil Pnliay; TITLE 16 *Surface Water - consideration for an award. Thin ity encourages NOTICE DF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION managemm' and Title 19. `Zoning and Develop• minority and viomen-owned firms to submit bide AND Mont Code., consistent with the City's policy to insure that such OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF Public Comment a Appeals: Comments regarding firms are afforded the maximum practicable oppor NONStGNtF1CANCE{DNS] the enviromm�nfal, site plan. and deSign TBview tumtyto comoele for and*Iafn public contracts. Project Nam.=. Progressiye Insurance Claims Of- components of Ilse app[iralion are due July 15, The Contractor wit: be raquimd la comply ivilh all uce 2913. Only the apoRcaot, persons who submit local, State, and Federal laws and regulations per -'Project Dessfllolion; Prooased CansiruClian oI a written or verbal comments to rha Director at tainlrrgloactual employment opnortumilim new 16.608 square -toot OT110 building. Site iM- Community and EDDROMIC Development, of par - The City anticipates Zwarding this project to the pmvamonis also inclpda parking la acenmmodata 5ana Who SpeGHlealfy request a copy of pie written successful bidder and infonds to give Notice to 115 vehllxles, stormwaler laclllty, road and utility decision may appeal the d'ueclor's deelsfon. Corm - Proceed, effect QJuly22, 2011 cons AX11on, and 4andMiling. The appOCanl has meets regarding I e temporary wetlnd butler On - RESERVATION OF RIGHTS: ;aelosied to ternporatfly encroach into a rrelfand creachmenl cnmponani o1 the application may be The City or Federal Way reserves The fight to rareci bullar far utility conneL'tfons The site plan review submitted In Die Nearing Examiner by delivering any and all bids, waiVe any mtarmalhfss or minor 0651011 will be adrnmislralive v a Use Process lit Ihese WMmantS to the Community and ECOMOMIL irregularities in the bidding, and dotermmne vihi�lr prouclums. The w0 and bufler encroachment de• Deve'opment pepatOnant wjQr 10 the public treat - hid or bidder meats the Crneda set forth in the bid efsion will tie Issued by (Do Rearing Examiner via 1no date, or by giving mesa Ti 10 the HBarinO Examiner at the public bearing. Only the applicant, aafsoos who submit written or verbal comments to the Huaring Examiner. or persons who spacih- carry request a copy al Itre Yiritten decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decigian. Details of appeal. praeaduree ref the requesfad land use ftl- van YAII be included with the vmtlen dactslan. Issuance of Final Environmental De[errrlination: The final Da[erminalion at Nonsignifrnntr (ONSj may Ile Issued without a Second Comment period, unless firmly comments idanlity probable stgniff- cant adverse Impacts that were nol r,"Nerod by the Natice of optional DNS. A copy of Inc DNS freay be obtained upon reouesl. Avallabdily of File: The 0111dal project Isle is avail able lot public review at the Community and Eco- nam c Devolopmenl DepailmeA[, 33325 8th Ave- nue South, Federal Way. 4VA 98003 Stall Contact: Matthew Herrera — Associate Plan- ner;253-835-2638 Published in the Federal Way Mirror: June 28, 2013 FWM2033— SUMMONS To: Extreme Energy Sports and Fitness Center, a gereraT partnership. You have been sued by Stacey Sfeinwandol, the Plainliq In. the Dislflcl Court in and Kati Kao Counl j Idatih, Case No. CV-13.2867. The nai)rre at Ifre a4fm i5 for unjust eridchmenl for gym ocipipmont. you are using gym equipment ac- quirad by partner fl♦m Usan•Wilson IU has not bear) plaid for by EWV Usan•WINan or by you and are IhUflfato receiving it benekt uniustly, Any time alter 20 days lullovnng the last pubi:ca- tlon of this summons, the court may enter a judg- ment lupins[ YOU wllhael Itlrlhor notice. Unlaae poor to Ural lime you have Filed a welter, response in this proper farm. including The Case No'. antl paid any required Iiling fee to the Clark of the Court (PD Box 4000 Collor d'Alene, ID 83016 (mailing! or 39 W. Garden Ave. Coaur eAluma. Idaho 8381E (phyoua!) vath a Telephone number or (208)446- 11601 and served a Copy a1 your response w the Plat fall's attorney at The Law Offices a1 Tyler S. Wiilek. PLLC, 250 Northwest Blvd. Ste, 107A, Coeur d'A cne, ID 83814,208-292-4200. A pripy, of the Snmmnns and Complaint ran he ob- ralled by contacting either the Clark at the Caun or the attorney Tor Palnrdf. it you vnsb legal assls- Ladee. you should trnmedrafey retain an otarney to advise you in this matter. First Date Published: June 28, 2013 Last Date Published: July 12, 2013 PWM 2032 Sales Positions SALES CONSULTANT • Multi Media Advertising 0 Tired of working nights or weekends? Looking for an exciting career in Sales? Sound Publishing, Inc. Sales Consultants -Whidbey Island 40 has an immediate opening for an Advertising Sales Consultant with the Bellevue Reporter. Thurston N The ideal candidates will demonstrate strong interpersonal skills, both written and oral, and have Eventtsap -Everett 0 excellent communications skills; must be motivated and take the initiative to sell multiple media Pierce County an products including on-line adverttring and special products, work with existing customers and find Bellevue vC ways to grow sales and income with new prospective clients. Sales experience necessary; Print media Inside Sales (D experience Is a definite asset. Must be tomputer-proficient with data processing and spreadsheers as Poulsbo well asotiNing the Internet. Position requires use of personal cell phone and vehicle, possession of Renton = valid WA State Driver's License and proof of active vehicle insurance. Ad Director -Everett Compensation includes salary plus commission and we offer a competitive benefits package Reporters & Editorial Qj including health insurance, paid time off (vacation, sick, and holidays), and 401K retirement plan. Reporter LL It you're interested M joining our team and working for the leading independent newspaper - in Washington State, then we want to hear from you! Email us your rover letter and PT efnt Reporter, publisher resume to: hreastr"Fsauncipublishingsom or mail to: Sound Publishing, Inc., 19426 681h Avenue S. Editor Kent, WA 98032, ATTN: HRIBM - Forks Non -Media Positions Office CoordilnsideSales SOUND -Marysville • Truck Driver PUBLISH I NGINC -Everett For a list of our most currentjob openings and to learn more about us visit ourwebsite: www.soundpublishing.com 47EDERAL WA �^f 31919 1 s' Ave S, Suite 101 1 Federal, Way, WA 98003 1253.925.5565 1253.925.5750 (f) Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way - Economic Development as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive weeks(s), commencing on the 28th day of June 2013, and ending on the 28th day of June 20I3, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $180.25, which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.020. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 1 st day of July 2013. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, �01m i I1f 11!,� Lp U I8' f' P DEC r*: 18 2013 Residing at Federal Way CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cit .off deralwa .com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed A e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on J ti vac-_ 2Q51— , 2013. Project Name 4 File Number(s) l3 Signature Date _ Lam- 1-3 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 6/28/2013 8:27:00 AM CRY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Progressive Insurance Claims Office Project Description: Proposed construction of a new 16,608 square -foot office building. Site improvements also include parking to accommodate 115 vehicles, stormwater facility, road and utility construction, and landscaping. The applicant has requested to temporarily encroach into a wetland buffer for utility connections. The site plan review decision will be administrative via Use Process III procedures, The wetland buffer encroachment decision will be issued by the Hearing Examiner via Use Process IV procedures. Applicant: Eric Labrie, ESM Consulting Engineers, 33400 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Subject Property Project Location: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, WA 98003, APN 202104-9051 vicinity Map Application Received: June 7, 2013 Determined Complete: June 25, 2013 Notice of Application: June 28, 2013 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the city, it is likely that the Responsible Official will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Environmental comments must be submitted by the date noted below. Permits Under Review: Use Process IV (File #13-102511-UP), Concurrency (File #13-102513-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #13-102512-SE) Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Final Wetland Inventory Report (July 19, 1999); Stream Inventory (November 29, 2001); Geologic Hazards Map IX-5 (October 2006); Technical Information Report; Critical Area Study; Geotechnical Report; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the environmental, site plan, and design review components of the application are due July 15, 2013. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Director of Community and Economic Development, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the director's decision. Comments regarding the temporary wetland buffer encroachment component of the application may be submitted to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Associate Planner Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638 Doc. I.D. 63613 Tina Piety From: Mary Lou Goss <mgoss@fedwaymirror.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:52 PM To: Tina Piety Subject: Re: FW: Legal Notice Yes I did, sorry I didn't get a chance to let you know... Mary Lou Goss Office Coordinator/ Advertising Sales Consultant Office: 253-925-5565, Ext 3056 Internal: 02-3056 31919 1st Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 M. _, Sound Publishing, Inc. Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit Sound Info On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Tina Piety <I'ina.Pie ,ciiyoffederalway.com> wrote: Hi, Did you receive this request? Thank you, Tina From: Tina Piety Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:50 PM To: Admin at Fed Way Mirror Subject: Legal Notice Hello, Please publish the attached legal notice (Progressive Insurance NOA & Opt DNS, # 13-102511-UP) in Friday's (6/28/13) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. Thank you, Tina Piety, Administrative Assistant II Department of Community and Economic Development City of Federal Way 1 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609 a DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3332Avenue South AN,Federal Way WA 98003 CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way www.citvoffederolwo.y.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION ►, Cam_ T '! hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significarce (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other was mailed ❑ faxed ttih �_ 2013. Project Name ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Pelmit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Xe-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on File Number(s) J- 0-26 II /,3-/r.�5 .2., �--13 -& i_3 Signature Date K:\CD Adminislralion Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Lost printed 6/6/2013 11:47:00 AM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Progressive Insurance Claims Office Project Description: Proposed construction of a new 16,608 square -foot office building. Site improvements also include parking to accommodate 115 vehicles, stormwater facility, mad and utility construction, and landscaping. The applicant has requested to temporarily encroach into a wetland buffer for utility connections. The site plan review decision will be administrative via Use Process III procedures. The wetland buffer encroachment decision will be issued by the Hearing Examiner via Use Process IV procedures. Applicant: Eric Labrie, ESM Consulting Engineers, 33400 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 subject Property " QG Project Location: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, WA 98003, APN 202104-9051 vicinity Map Application Received: June 7, 2013 Determined Complete: June 25, 2013 Notice of Application: June 28, 2013 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the city, it is likely that the Responsible Official will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Environmental comments must be submitted by the date noted below. Permits Under Review: Use Process IV (File #13-102511-UP), Concurrency (File #13-102513-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #13-102512-SE) Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Final Wetland Inventory Report (July 19, 1999); Stream Inventory (November 29, 2001); Geologic Hazards Map IX-5 (October 2006); Technical Information Report; Critical Area Study; Geotechnical Report; and Environmental Checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Comments regarding the environmental, site plan, and design review components of the application are due July 15, 2013. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Director of Community and Economic Development, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the director's decision. Comments regarding the temporary wetland buffer encroachment component of the application may be submitted to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date, or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Staff Contact: Associate Planner Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638 Doc. I.D. 63613 NOA/Optional DNS and Environmental Checklist to: DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER FISHERIES DIVISION 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98002 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 basbury@lakehaven.org BRANDON REYNON PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1IT AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 chris.ingham@southkingfire.org gordon.goodsell@southkingfire.org RAMON PAZOOKI WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 330310 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov Doc 1 D 63703 Tina Piety From: Tina Piety Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 2:21 PM To: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov; basbury@lakehaven.org; Chris Ingham; Gordon Goodsell; ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov Cc: Matt Herrera Subject: Federal Way Notice of Application and Optional Determination of Nonsignificance Attachments: Progressive Environmental Checklist.pdf; Progressive Insurance NOA & Opt DNS.pdf Hello, Attached you will find a Notice of Application and Optional Determination of Nonsignificance for the Federal Way Progressive Insurance Claims Office project. The environmental checklist is also attached. If you have any comments or questions, please contact Associate Planner Matthew Herrera at 253-835-2638, or rnatt.harrera cit offederalwa .cam. Thank you, Tina Piety, Administrative Assistant II Department of Community and Economic Development City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609 r� CITY OF Fe d e I Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RECEIVE,y3-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.oityoffed_era I way.coln UN 0 7 2013 CITY OF FI;DcRAL 1,4'Ay CDs ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional infonmation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions. For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "prop.osal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Page 1 of 13 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Center 2. Name of applicant: Zaremba Group LLC — Attn: Sean McDermott 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Name: Zaremba Group, LLC Attn: Sean McDermott Address: 14600 Detroit Ave City/State: Lakewood, OH Zip: 44107 Phone: (216) 838-6113 x163 Fax: N/A Email: smcdermott a.zarembazroup.coIn 4. Date checklist prepared: June 3, 2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): It is anticipated that the Process III/IV, SEPA review, constructions approvals, and other permitting procedures will take approximately 6 to 8 months. All on -site and off -site improvements will be constructed in a single phase. The target start time for construction to begin will be during the spring of 2014. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to this proposal. 8. List any environmental infonnation you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Engineering Report by AESI, Inc dated May 16, 2013 Traffic Analysis by Transpo Group dated May 16, 2013 Critical Area Study by Wetland Resources, Inc dated May 20, 2013 Preliminary Technical Information Report by ESM Consulting Engineers dated May 20, 2013 Page 2 of 13 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. The Federal Way Village project lies directly north of this site and may coordinate with this proposal regarding the extension of South 340th. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Process III Project Approval Process IV Project Approval Traffic Concurrency Review SEPA Approval WSDOT Access Permit Signal Modification Clearing and Grading Road and Storm Drainage Approval Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is for a new Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office that will be primarily used for office space. The property is a long rectangular 8.27 acres in the Commercial Enterprise (CE) Zone. The building and parking will be situated on the eastern half of the property while the western half will be protected and retained as a wetland/regional storm detention facility: The office building will be a single story 16,608 SF office for approximately 74 employees and will have 115 parking stalls provided on -site. Primary access will be from Pacific Highway South via an extension of a road (S 340th St) at the intersection of Pacific Highway and 16th Ave S. Sewer will be collected and released into an existing sewer line that runs north and south through the center of the property. Storm will be collected and released to an existing storm pond along the north -central portion of the property. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject property is located in the City of Federal Way in south King County. It can be found on the NE '/ of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East W.M. The site is on the west side of Pacific Highway South at the intersection with 16th Avenue South. It has approximately 300 linear feet of frontage along Pacific Highway. Please refer to the Assessors Map, Site Plans, and Vicinity Map on the site plans. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one(flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. The site is very flat in the area that work is proposed. However on the western half near the regional Page 3 of 13 detention facility there are engineered slopes that were constructed as part of the regional stormwater detention facility and sewer main installation. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? According to the topographic survey, the steepest slope on the site is approximately 20% located near the central portion of the property between the regional detention facility and the proposed construction area. The area proposed for development, is relatively flat at 1%-5%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, inulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. on May 16, 2013, the site is predominantly loose to medium dense fill overlying an alluvial deposit consisting of loose/medium stiff sand, clayey silt, and silty clay, overlying dense to very dense advance washout sand and gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no indications of unstable soils on -site and no indicators on regional sensitive areas maps. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of proposed grading will be to accommodate the proposed building and associated parking. Filling or grading quantities will be prepared as part of the clearing and grading permit. However, it is anticipated that filling/grading will be minimal. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur on -site as a result of construction activities; however, temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures to be approved by the City of Federal Way will be employed during construction to reduce erosion impacts. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 12.5% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. During construction, the contractor will follow an approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan meeting City of Federal Way standards. Typical measures, which may be employed, include the use of silt fences, straw bales, and temporary storm drainage features. Hydroseeding exposed soils and cleared areas after construction will also reduce the potential for erosion. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Page 4 of 13 Construction: Some heavy machinery exhaust and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment will be produced during the construction phase of this project. The amount of emissions to the air will be minimal and will occur during the actual construction of the development. All equipment will be well maintained and have proper air quality treatment installed as required by the manufacturer. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to reduce dust. Long 'ferns _Air Quality: The primary use of the proposed building is for offices. As such, long-term air impacts would be those typically associated office space land uses. Sources of long-term emissions and odor could include vehicle emissions from increased vehicle use generated by the service center. The additional vehicular emissions in these areas are not anticipated to concentrate and therefore are not anticipated to create a health hazard to the surrounding areas. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No off -site sources of emission or odor will affect this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. As stated above all construction equipment will be in proper working order and regulated for emissions by the manufacturer and local emission laws. Vehicles entering and leaving the site will also be regulated for emissions by state and local emission laws. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to keep any dust from impacting surrounding air quality. 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. According to the Critical Areas Study prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. and the Federal Way inventory, the site contains a wetland and stream complex constructed as part of the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility located on the western portion of the subject property. The wetland is defined as a Category II Wetland and the stream is defined as a Major Stream pursuant to the Federal Way City Code. The stream is a tributary of Hylebos Creek. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes the proposal will require work within 200 feet of the above described wetlands. No work is proposed within the wetlands but the sanitary sewer connection will require work within the wetland buffer. Please see the Critical Areas Study Map prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. for details regarding the impact to the wetland buffer. Stormwater will be collected and released to an existing storm detention pond that is not in the 100 foot wetland buffer but is within 200 feet of the wetland. Please see site plans for details. Page 5 of 13 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No filling or dredging will take place in the wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Map (Floodplains) the site does not lie within a 100- year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No the proposal will not discharge waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No.ground water will be withdrawn nor will water be discharged to ground water. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. No on -site septic or treatment is proposed. c. Water Runoff (including stonmwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. On -site storm water runoff will primarily be generated from building rooftops, parking areas and associated drive aisles. Storm water will be collected, routed through required storm water quality treatment facilities and discharged to an existing stormwater detention pond. This existing pond is located along the north property line about midway from east to west. See the Preliminary Storm Drainage Report and Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers submitted as part of this Process III/IV Site Plan review application. Page 6 of 13 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials will enter ground or surface waters. The proposed site storm water drainage and sewer plans will ensure that all water that is generated from the site will be treated in water quality facilities prior to its release as required by City of Federal Way standards. Best Management Practices will be used throughout the construction of the proposal to ensure that no waste enters ground or surface waters without first being treated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. The storm water runoff will be collected and conveyed to the existing detention pond in conformance with the City of Federal Way standards. Please see the Preliminary Storm Drainage Report and Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. _X deciduous tre alder aple, aspe cottonwoo other _X__ evergreen tree. fir cedar pine, other _ shrubs _X_ grass pasture crop or grain. _X_ wet soil plan cattail tterc bulrus kunlc eabba other water plant.: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetatio . co c roo b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site is currently undeveloped with minimal vegetation. The eastern and central portion of the site, which is proposed for development, is generally devoid of vegetation other than low -growing shrubs and grasses. The western portion of the property, which contains the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility has vegetation characteristic of wetland areas. The shrubs and grasses in the eastern and central portion of the property will be removed for construction of the building, vehicular driveways and parking areas. The vegetation in the regional detention facility easement area is not proposed for removal or alteration. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known endangered or threatened species on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Native landscaping will be installed along the perimeter of the development area and street frontages pursuant to City of Federal Way guidelines. The vegetation near and around the wetland and stream complex will remain undisturbed except for the 15 foot wide corridor for the proposed sewer connection. See the Preliminary Landscape Plan prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers submitted as part of this Process III Site Plan review application. Page 7 of 13 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: hawk, herop, eagI son bir other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. This entire region is known to be part of the Pacific Flyway. The Pacific Flyway includes Alaska and the Aleutian Islands and the Rocky Mountain and Pacific coast regions of Canada, the United States and Mexico, south to where it becomes blended with other flyways in Central and South America. However, the site is not known to be used by migratory fowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Installation of native landscaping will provide coverage and habitat for urban tolerant wildlife. In addition, the vegetation within the regional detention facility easement area will remain undisturbed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the needs of the project and natural gas will be made available for the purpose of heating and other needs associated with the service center building. No. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The service center building that will be constructed as a result of this project will meet or exceed the applicable commercial energy conservation consumption requirements in the City of Federal Way and the Uniform Building Code. Page 8 of 13 '7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. It is unlikely under normal working conditions that environmental health hazards would be encountered. All project -related construction will meet or exceed current local, state and federal laws. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. State regulations regarding safety and the handling of hazardous materials will be followed during the construction process. Equipment refueling areas would be located in areas where a spill could be quickly contained and where the risk of hazardous materials entering surface water is minimized. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? The primary noise source near the project site is from vehicular traffic on Pacific Highway South to the east. The traffic noise along this roadway is not project related or generated, and is not anticipated to greatly affect the proposed project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Construction would occur during permitted construction hours and always in compliance with the City of Federal Way noise regulations. Long-term impacts would be those associated with the increase in vehicular traffic from future employees and customers. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Construction activity will be limited to permitted construction hours and construction equipment will not be allowed to idle for continuous periods of time, which will help to mitigate the impacts of potential construction noise. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current uses of the site and adjacent properties are as follows: SITE: Vacant land and Regional Stormwater Detention Facility NORTH: Undeveloped Land and Regional Stormwater Detention Facility SOUTH: Office and light industrial EAST: Commercial and light industrial WEST: Light industrial Page 9 of 13 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No the site has not been used for agriculture. c. Describe any'structures on the site. There are no existing structures on -site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. Wbat is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial Enterprise (CE) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial Enterprise (CE) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally critical area? If so, specify. Yes, according to the Critical Area Study prepared by Wetland Resources and the Federal Way inventory, a Category II Wetland and Major Stream are located on site. However, these sensitive areas are located within the regional stormwater detention facility permanent easement area outside of the proposed development area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? It is anticipated that the proposed claims center will have approximately 74 employees. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The project will be developed in accordance with applicable City of Federal Way development and land use codes to ensure the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable Development Regulations in effect at the time of a complete Process IIUIV application. Page 10 of 13 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None proposed. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of the proposed building will be approximately 30 feet high. The principal exterior building material will be metal siding and brick. Please see elevations and materials sheets provided by the architect, Richard L. Bowen and Associates Inc. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Development of the site would result in a change to the visual character of the site for the nearest existing businesses and roadways from that of an undeveloped site to that of a service center. No views will be obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The site plan has been developed to provide a site design layout consistent with the development regulations in place for the CE zone. Proposed design and landscaping consistent with City of Federal Way's development regulations will help to reduce aesthetic impacts. Please refer to the Building Elevations and Design Intent submitted with this application. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed site development will not create any permanent glare to off -site sources. Light and glare produced from this project will be typical of an office building in a commercial development. Light and glare from the site would primarily be during business hours and consist of site lighting and vehicle headlights entering and leaving the property. Please refer to the Photometric Plan prepared by H.F. Lenz dated May 21, 2013. No. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Page 11 of 13 c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Providing the required setbacks of the proposed building from the property lines and installation of landscaping will help to alleviate some of the light and glare created by the new development from the adjacent properties and roadways. The proposed use is consistent with the land use regulations and compatible to the existing adjacent land uses. Please refer to the Photometric Plan prepared by H.F. Lenz dated May 21, 2013. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? No designated or informal recreation opportunities are in the immediate vicinity. No. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. No measures proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To the best of our knowledge, there are no landmarks or evidence of any significant historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural resources known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. If any such historic or cultural evidence was encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work would be halted in the area and a state -approved archaeologist/historian would be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project will obtain access from the proposed new road (South 340th Street) along the northern property boundary. The new road will align with the Pacific Highway South and 16`h Avenue South intersection. Page 12 of 13 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes the site is served by public transit. There is a known bus stop at the intersection of Pacific Highway and 16`h Ave S. Bus route 500 is known to stop here. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have 115 parking spaces and will be eliminating no parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, the proposed project will construct full width improvements for a new public right-of-way (South 340th Street) along the northern property boundary, plus frontage improvements and a signal modification along Pacific Highway South. No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Weekday PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed Progressive building were estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation (9th Edition, 2012). The Progressive office building is estimated to generate 4 inbound and 21 outbound trips during the weekday PM peak hour based on the average trip generation rate for the General Office land use (#710). These trips were distributed consistent with the Village at Federal Way development and added to the S 340th Street- 16th Avenue S / Pacific Highway S intersection 2016 background traffic volumes. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. The proposed measures to reduce transportation impacts include the design and construction of a new public right-of-way (South 340c' Street) along the northern property line. Traffic impact fees will also be paid to offset any impacts to surrounding roads. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will result in a slight increase in need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. This increase in demand will be offset by fees, levies, and taxes required to be paid by the applicant as part of this development. Also the proposal has been designed in a manner that will provide adequate access for fire, medic, and police vehicles. Page 13 of 13 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other (please list) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sanitary Sewer: Water: Electricity: Natural Gas: Telephone: Cable TV: Refuse Service: Lakehaven Utility District Lakehaven Utility District Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Century Link Communications Comcast City of Federal Way C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. SIGNATURE: Evan Mann, Project Planner DATE SUBMITTED: June 7,_ 2013 Page 14 of 13 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 11, 2013 TO: Ann Dower, Development Services Rick Perez, Traffic Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Matt Herrera --Planning FOR DRCMTG. ON., June 20, 2013 — Internal completeness and preliminary review FILE NUMBER(s): 13-102511-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: 12-102319-PC PROJECT NAME: PROGRESSIVE CLAIMS OFFICE PROJECTADDRESS: 34001 PACIFIC HWY S ZONING DISTRICT: CE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed 16,973 square foot office structure and related site improvements. LAND USE PERMITS: Process III Site Plan / Process IV Critical Area Encroachment / SEPA PROJECT CONTACT. ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLC ERIC LABRIE 33400 8 h Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 MATERMLS SUBMITTED: 1. Signed MLU application 18. Architectural Sheets 2. Vicinity Map a. b. Floor Plan Sight Study 3. Assessor Map c. Site Details 4. Site Photos d. Exterior Elevations 5. Title Report (2) e. Material Sheet 6. Water/Sewer Availability Certificates 19. Civil Sheets 7. Environmental Checklist (8) a. Cover 8. CPTED Checklist (4) b. Topographic Survey 9. Mailing Labels (2 sets) w/list c. Site Plan 10. Architectural Design Intent (4) d. Detailed Site Plan 11. Geotechnical Report (4) e. Preliminary Drainage, Grading and ROW 12. Photometric Plan (4) f. plan 1 Preliminary Drainage, Grading and ROW 13. ROW Lighting Plan (4) plan 2 14. ROW Photometric w/ Analysis (4) g. Road Cross Sections 15. Preliminary TIR (4) h. Preliminary Landscape Plan 16. Critical Area Study (4) i. Landscape Plan Details and Notes 17. Wellhead Checklist (4) CITY OF�L� Federal Way DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8'b Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-632 253-835-2607;�3F r3 www.cit o edera}way.corn JUN 01 N13 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Checklist Directions Please fill out the checklist to indicate which strategies have been used to implement CPTED principles in your proposed project. Please check all strategies that are applicable to your project for each of the numbered guidelines. You may check more than one strategy for each guideline. Your responses will be evaluated by City Staff, and will be integrated into the Site Plan and/or Building Permit review process. Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 1.0 Natural Surveillance 1.1 Blind Corners LConforms Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. Revise _NA Comments: Pathways should be direct. All barriers along pathways should be permeable (see through) including landscaping, fencing etc. ■ Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead of them and around corners. 8 Other strategy used: 1.2 Site and Building Layout rConform Allow natural observation from the street to the use, from the _Revise use to the street, and between uses _NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 9 k:\landoutslCPTED Checklist Section and f Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy III Applicable during Site Plan Review 6 Applicable during Building Permit Review Orient the main entrance towards the street or both streets on For Non -Single corners. ■ Family Development ❑ Position habitable rooms with windows at the front of the dwelling. ■ Access to dwellings or other uses above commercial/ retail development should not be from the rear of the building. In ❑ Offset windows, doorways and balconies to allow for natural observation while protecting privacy. _ Locate main entrances/exits at the front of the site and in view of the street. ■ For Commercial/ Retail/ Industrial If employee entrances must be separated from the main and Community entrance, they should maximize opportunities for natural Facilities surveillance from the street:. ■ In industrial developments, administration/offices should be located at the front of the building. ■ Avoid large expanses of parking. Where large expanses of For Surface ❑ parking are proposed, provide surveillance such as security Parking and cameras. ■ Parking Structures Access to elevators, stairwells and pedestrian pathways should be clearly visible from an adjacent parking area. ■ ❑ Avoid hidden recesses. ■ Locate parking areas in locations that can be observed by adjoining uses. ■ Open spaces shall be clearly designated and situated at For Common/ locations that are easily observed by people. Parks, plazas, Open Space common areas, and playgrounds should be placed in the front Areas of buildings. Shopping centers and other similar uses should face streets. ■ Other strategy used: Evaluation for Agency Use Only Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 9 kAHandouts\CPTED Cbecklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review B Applicable during Building Permit Review 1.3 Common/Open Space Areas and Public On -Site Open Conforms Space _Revise Provide natural surveillance for commonlopen space areas. _NA Comments: Position active uses or habitable rooms with windows adjacent ❑ to main common/open space areas, e.g. playgrounds, swimming pools, etc., and public on -site open space. ■ Design and locate dumpster enclosures in a manner which screens refuse containers but avoids providing opportunities to hide. ■ Locate waiting areas and external entries to elevators/stairwells close to areas of active uses to make them visible from the building entry. e Locate seating in areas of active uses. e Other strategy used: 1.4 Entrances .Conforms Provide entries that are clearly visible. _Revise _NA Comments: Design entrances to allow users to see into them before entering. ■ Entrances should be clearly identified (Signs must conform to [IFWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. (Applicable during Certificate of Occupancy Ins ection . Other strategy used: 13 1.5 Fencing onform Fence design should maximize natural surveillance from the _Revise street to the building and from the building to the street, and _NA minimize opportunities for intruders to hide. Comments: Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 9 k\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and v" I Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Front fences should be predominantly open in design, e.g. pickets or wrought iron, or low in height. e Design high solid front fences in a manner that incorporates ❑ open elements to allow visibility above the height of five feet. e If noise insulation is required, install double -glazing at the ❑ front of the building rather than solid fences higher than five feet. e Other strategy used: 46 1.6 Landscaping Avoid landscaping which obstructs natural surveillance and allows intruders to hide. ❑ Trees with dense low growth foliage should be spaced or their crown should be raised to avoid a continuous barrier. in Use low groundcover, shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in ❑ height, or high -canopied trees (clean trimmed to a height of eight feet) around children's play areas, parking areas, and along pedestrian pathways. ■ Avoid vegetation that conceals the building entrance from the street. ■ Other strategy used: 1.7 Exterior Lighting Provide exterior lighting that enhances natural surveillance. (Refer to FWRC 19.115.050(7)(a) for specific lighting requirements.) Prepare a lighting plan in accordance with Illuminating Engineering Society of America (IESA) Standards, which addresses project lighting in a comprehensive manner. Select a lighting approach that is consistent with local conditions and crime problems. ■ Evaluation for Agency Use Only Revise __NA Comments: " Conforms _Revise _NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 4 of 9 k:\Handouts\OPTED Checklist Section and 1 ✓ 1 Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Locate elevated light fixtures (poles, light standards, etc.) in a coordinated manner that provides the desired coverage. The useful ground coverage of an elevated light fixture is roughly twice its height. ■ For areas intended to be used at night, ensure that lighting supports visibility. Where lighting is placed at a lower height to support visibility for pedestrians, ensure that it is vandal - resistant. e El Ensure inset or modulated spaces on a building facade, access/egress routes, and signage is well lit. e ❑ In areas used by pedestrians, ensure that lighting shines on pedestrian pathways and possible entrapment spaces. e Place lighting to take into account vegetation, in its current and mature form, as well as any other element that may have the potential for blocking light e Avoid lighting of areas not intended for nighttime use to avoid giving a false impression of use or safety. If danger spots are usually vacant at night, avoid lighting them and close them off to pedestrians. e ❑ Select and light "safe routes" so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity after dark. ■ Avoid climbing opportunities by locating light standards and electrical equipment away from walls or low buildings. e Use photoelectric rather than time switches for exterior lighting. e In projects that will be used primarily by older people ❑ (retirement homes, congregate care facilities, senior and/ or community centers, etc.) provide higher levels of brightness in public/common areas. e Other strategy used: 1.8 Mix of Uses In mixed use buildings increase opportunities for natural surveillance, while protecting privacy. Evaluation for Agency Use Only rLNA owns se Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 5 of 9 lc\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy 0 Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Where allowed by city code, locate shops and businesses on lower floors and residences on upper floors. In this way, ❑ residents can observe the businesses after hours while the residences can be observed by the businesses during business hours. ■ ❑ Include food kiosks, restaurants, etc. within parks and parking structures_ ■ Other strategy: used �A 1.9 Security Bars, Shutters, and Doors _Conforms When used and permitted by building andfire codes, security Revise bars, shutters, and doors should allow observation of the street _NA and be consistent with the architectural style of the building. Comments: ❑ Security bars and security doors should be visually permeable (see -through). e Other strategy used: A AA Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy M Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 2.0 Access Control 2.1 Building Identification "Conforms Ensure buildings are clearly identified by street number to vise prevent unintended access and to assist persons trying to find *AA the building. Identification signs must conform to FWRC Comments: 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. f sStreet numbers should be plainly visible and legible from the treet or road fronting the property. e Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 6 of 9 k:\landoutslCPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review In residential uses, each individual unit should be clearly numbered. In multiple building complexes, each building entry ❑ should clearly state the unit numbers accessed from than entry. In addition, unit numbers should be provided on each level or floor. e ❑ Street numbers should be made of durable materials, preferably reflective or luminous, and unobstructed (e.g. by foliage). e For larger projects, provide location maps (fixed plaque ❑ format) and directional signage at public entry points and along internal public routes of travel. e Other strategy used: ❑ ptcg��L- tret�T712) iP�p cT 2.2 Entrances _ Conforms Avoid confusion in locating building entrances. Revise _NA Comments: Entrances should be easily recognizable through design Afeatures and directional signage. (Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. ■ ❑ Minimize the number of entry points. ■ Other strategy used: 2.3 Landscaping _Conforms Use vegetation as barriers to deter unauthorized access. Revise NA Comments: ❑ Consider using thorny plants as an effective barrier. e Other strategy used: 13 2.4 Landscaping Location .._Conforms Avoid placement of vegetation that would enable access to a Revise building or to neighboring buildings. —NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 7 of 9 k:\HandoutslCPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy e Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Avoid placement of large trees, garages, utility structures, fences, and gutters next to second story windows or balconies that could provide a means of access. 9 Other strategy used: 2.5 Security _Conform Reduce opportunities for unauthorized access _Revise _NA Comments: Consider the use of security hardware and/or human measures to reduce opportunities for unauthorized access. (Applicable during Certi care of Occupancy Ins ection . Other strategy used: ❑ T �,,, nJ A 2.6 Signage Conform Insure that signage is clearly visible, easy to read and simple to _Revise understand [Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt _.NA Signs]. Comments: Use strong colors, standard symbols, and simple graphics for informational signs. e Upon entering the parking area, provide both pedestrians and For Surface ❑ drivers with a clear understanding of the direction to stairs, Parking and elevators, and exits. e Parking Structures El In multi -level parking areas, use creative signage to distinguish between floors to enable users to easily locate their cars. e ❑ Advise users of security measures that are in place and where to find them, i.e. security phone or intercom system e ❑ Provide signage in the parking area advising users to lock their cars. 8 Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 8 of 9 k:�HandoutslCPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy i Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Where exits are closed after hours, ensure this information is indicated at the parking area entrance. e Other strategy used: Section 3.0 Ownership 3.1 Maintenance Conforms Create a "cared for" image Revise NA Comments: Ensure that landscaping is well maintained, as per FWRC 19.125,090, in order to give an impression of ownership, care, and security. (Ongoing). Where possible, design multi -unit residential uses such that no ❑ more than six to eight units share a common building entrance. ■ Other strategy used: Z_ 3.2 Materials —Conforms Use materials, which reduce the opportunity for vandalism. —Revise _NA Comments: Consider using strong, wear resistant laminate, impervious glazed ceramics, treated masonry products, stainless steel materials, anti -graffiti paints, and clear over sprays to reduce opportunities for vandalism. Avoid flat or porous finishes in areas where graffiti is likely to be a problem. e ❑ Where large walls are unavoidable, refer to FWRC 19.125.040(21) regarding the use of vegetative screens. e Common area and/or street furniture shall be made of long ❑ wearing vandal resistant materials and secured by sturdy anchor points, or removed after hours. e Other strategy used: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 9 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist 40k DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8'h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 CITY OF 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way www.cityofl'ederalway.coni HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY STATEMENT CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AND WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS RECEIVED JUN 07 2013 I. WHY SHOULD THIS INVENTORY STATEMENT BE FILLED OUT? CM OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Critical Aquifer Recharge (CARAs) and Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) are considered "critical areas" pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWCC), Title 14, "Environmental Policy." This inventory statement must be filled out by the applicant or agent for any proposed activity listed in Section II of this handout, and which are located within Wellhead Capture Zones 1, 5, and 10 as shown on the Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas Maps. Please refer to the handout on Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas for a description of the review process. II. ACTIVITIES GOVERNED BY CARA AND WHPA REGULATIONS The inventory statement must be filled out for the following activities: • Construction of any residential structure, including single-family development ■ Construction of any barn or other agricultural structure • Construction of any office, school, commercial, recreational, service, or storage building • Construction of a parking lot of any size + Other minor new construction (see WAC 197-11-800[2]) ■ Additions or modifications to or replacement of any building or facility (does not include tenant improvements) + Demolition of any structure • Any landfill or excavation • Installation of underground tanks • Any division of land, including short plats • Change of use, which involves repair, remodeling, and maintenance activities • Dredging • Reconstruction/maintenance of groins and similar shoreline protection structures ■ Replacement of utility cables that must be buried under the surface of the bedlands • Repair/rebuilding of major, dams, dikes, and reservoirs • Installation or construction of any utility, except for on -going operation and maintenance activities of public wells by public water providers • Personal wireless service facilities Project Name Progressive Insurance Claim Center Applicant Zaremba Group. LLC Attn: Sean McDermott Project Location 34001 Pac H►rrp S Fed Way, WA 98003 Tracking No. III. TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Please provide the approximate quantity of the types of hazardous materials or deleterious substances that will be stored, handled, treated, used, produced, recycled, or disposed of in connection with the proposed activity. If no hazardous materials will be involved, please proceed to Section IV. MATERIAL LIQUID (gallons) SOLID (pounds) MENEM (1) Acid or basic solutions or solids NSA N /� (2) Antifreeze or coolants / (3) Bleaches, peroxides, detergents, surfactants, disinfectants, bactericides, algaecides / (4) Brake, transmission, hydraulic fluids (5) Brine solutions (6) Corrosion or rust prevention solutions (7) Cutting fluids (8) Deicing materials (9) Dry cleaning or cleaning solvents (10) Electroplating or metal finishing solutions (11) Engraving or etching solutions (12) Explosives (13) Fertilizers (14) Food or animal processing wastes (15) Formaldehyde (16) Fuels, additives, oils, greases (17) Glues, adhesives, or resins (18) Inks, printing, or photocopying chemicals (19) Laboratory chemicals, reagents or standards (20) Medical, hospital, pharmaceutical, dental, or veterinary fluids or wastes } { (21) Metals (hazardous e.g. arsenic, copper, chromium, lead, mercury, silver, etc.) (22) Paints, pigments, dyes, stains, varnish, sealers. (23) Pesticides, herbicides or poisons (24) Plastic resins, plasticizers, or catalysts 1 (25) Photo development chemicals (26) Radioactive sources f (27) Refrigerants, cooling water (contact) (28) Sludges, still bottoms (29) Solvents, thinners, paint removers or strippers (30) Tanning (leather) chemicals (31) Transformer, capacitor oils/fluids, PCB's (32) Waste oil (33) Wood preservatives (34) List OTHER hazardous materials or deleterious substances on a separate sheet. Bulletin #056 — January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 3 k:\Handouts\Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement Project Name _ Progressive Insurance Claim Center Applicant 7aremba Group_ LLC Attn: Sean McDermott Project Location 34001 Pac Hwy S. Fed Way. WA 98003 Tracking No.. IV. FURTHER INFORMATION Provide the approximate quantity of fill and source of fill to be imported to the site. Approximate Quantity of Imported Fill Source of Fill N/A N/A Check box #1 if you do not plan to store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous material or deleterious substance listed in Section III. Check box(s) #2 through #5 (and fill in appropriate blanks) of the below table if they apply to your facility or activity. #1 [X] The proposed development will not store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous materials or deleterious substances listed above. #2 [ ] Above ground storage tanks, having a capacity of gallons will be installed. #3 [ X] Construction vehicles will be refueled on site. Storage within wholesale and retail facilities of hazardous materials, or other deleterious #4 [ ] substances. will be for sale in original containers with a capacity of _ gallons liquid or pounds solid. The presence of chemical substances on this parcel is/will be for "temporary" non -routine #5 [ ] maintenance or repair of the facility (such as paints and paint thinners) and are in individual containers with a capacity of _ gallons liquid or pounds solid. Check any of the following items that currently exist or are proposed in connection with the development of the site. #1 [X] Stormwater infiltration system (e.g., french drain, dry well, stormwater swale, etc.) #2 [ ] Hydraulic lifts or elevator, chemical systems, or other machinery that uses hazardous materials #3 [ ] Cathodic protection wells #4 [ ] Water wells, monitoring wells, resource protection wells, piezometers #5 [ ] Leak detection devices, training for employees for use of hazardous materials, self-contained machinery, etc. SIGNATURE May 30, 2013 Date Evan Mann Print Name If you have any questions about filling out this application form, please call the Department of Community Development Services at 253-835-2607. Please be advised that an application for a development permit lacking the required information will not be accepted. Bulletin #056 — January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 3 k:\Handouts\Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement RICHARD L. BOWEN + ASSOCIATES INC. June 6, 2013 Matt Herrera City of Federal Way Associate Planner 33325 8th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98063 Ph: 253.835.2638 RE: Proposed Progressive Regional Claims Center Narrative and Architectural Design Intent 34001 Pacific Way South — SR 99 & South 340th Street RLB+A #7697.12 Mr. Roe, RECEIVED 2 1 6•. 4 9 1. 9 3 0 0 JUN 07 2013 CM OF FEDERAL WAY A x . 4 9 1. 6 0 5 3 CDS Please accept this Statement of Architectural Design Intent and Narrative Summary of Project Compliance and enclosed information for your review and approval. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN INTENT Proposed new 16,973 SF single story, non-combustible, non -sprinkled, mixed -use building is to be constructed on an un-developed 8.27 acre site. The building entrance is oriented to North towards South 3401h Street. The site is developed for Progressive Insurance as a claims office with customer concierge service where customer cars are valeted by Progressive employees from a covered open canopy area to an S-2 use enclosed garage where customer cars are inspected and arrangements are made for repair. No repairs of vehicles occur on site. The customer cars are returned from off -site repairs, where they are inspected for quality of repair and made ready for customer pick-up. There is also an accessory non-combustible 1,466 SF carport on the site to cover approximately 6 cars. The carport is provided to cover and protect cars that are ready for customer pick up. The Business (B) use portion of the building is broken up between customer accessed space and employee accessed space. Customer transactions occur in a lobby greeter area directly off the covered open canopy, where paperwork, rental car, and repair arrangements are finalized. All customer drop-offs and pick-ups are by timed appointments so that the customer services are managed 13000 SHAKER BLVD CLEVELAND, OHIO 44120 The building primarily houses a Progressive Regional Claims Office with secured access. The claims office has an open office and private office spaces where claims insurance business functions occur. The remaining business space houses shared functions between the office A R C H I T E C T s and inspection bay space such as conference rooms, restrooms, break room, file room, storage and housekeeping. E N G I N E E R S It is our understanding that the proposed building will reside in a CE Commercial Enterprise zoning district. The building was developed to have a recognizable corporate image for the Progressive customer that relates to the customer experience to provide a clear definition of C o N S T R U C T 1 O N entry and architectural expression for the automobile drive up claims service. The selection of M A N A G E M E N T Mr. Matt Herrera City of Federal Way June 61h12013 materials and the use on the buildings represent the function of the buildings described above. The building has four-sided architecture which consists of a dark utility brick base, and a lighter complimentary grey brick that encloses and represents the inspection bay portion ofFERS . the building. The brick is has a wire cut type finish and compliment the metal panel color , selection of the building. A selection of metal panels and that express the functions of the building are represented on the rendered elevations provided. Off white composite panels p define the entry and provide a 14' clear cover for the customer drop-off and pick up area.,i, The canopy is expressed in depth to the front and surrounds a Butt glazed curtain wall system `rn which provides a clear view to the customer lobby. The curtain wall has a clear anodizedCr finish with clear insulating glass that has a slight grey tint. ��I� Accenting the front elevation is the building sign feature that defines the pedestrian and vehicular entrance to the lobby. The form is clad with a dark grey horizontal metal panel with a metallic finish that contrasts and visually separates the customer lobby service area with the Claims office portion of the building. The horizontal metal panels have articulated planed vertical reveals and mitered corner details to accent the corners of the form as it steps back from the canopy feature. The "Progressive" sign on this feature wall consists of individually mounted letters with a LED back -lit translucent white face letters and opaque white aluminum returns. The remaining claims office space is has a complimentary horizontal light grey metal panel feature with horizontal sloped shelf reveal and articulated vertical reveals with accented mitered corners that accents the detail consistency of the horizontal use of materials. The light grey panels are projects approx. 2'-0" from the building face providing cover for the horizontal continuous butt -glazed curtain wall system that brings natural light into the open and private offices of the claims office function of the building. Please note that HVAC units are centrally located along with high parapets to screen units from a good distance. A sight line study is provided indicating only the very tops of units may be seen from a good distance away from the site. Based on the building sightlines we believe the rooftop units are sufficiently screened. Because this is a corner lot we are also requesting another 'Progressive' Identity sign be mounted to the upper portion of the horizontal panels facing Pacific Highway South (SR-99). The sign configuration will be the same as described above for the feature wall except that the letter face will be 'Blue' and have a duo -film face where by the sign will be non -lit blue during the day and light up white in the evening. A monument sign using the building brick base and colors is identified on the proposed design plans for consideration identifying the corner property at Pacific Highway 99 South and South 340`h street. A remote all metal off-white steel frame carport is provided on site a secured parking area to provide protection for prepared cars to be staged for customer pick-up by appointment. The secured car area is enclosed with a pre -finished black 8'-0" high picket security fence. 12'-0" swing gates are provided for egress. The gates are open during business hours. Refer to enclosed plans. The enclosed recycling area will be enclosed with a brick wall to match the building. NARRATIVE SUMMARY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE GUIDELINES RICHARD L. BOWEN + ASSOCIATES INC. Mr. Matt Herrera City of Federal Way June 61h12013 The following are compliance comments with the applicable Community Design Guidelines Chapter 19.115. 19.115.050 Site Design 1. General Criteria a. Natural amenities such as views, significant trees or groups of trees and creeks... Response: Refer to civil and landscape plans for building orientation. b. Pedestrian areas and amenities... Response : A small pedestrian plaza is provided at the building entrance. c. Pedestrian areas should be easily seen, accessible... Response : The building entrance and position is oriented to the site to suite the building service function for Progressive's customers and employee's use which is primarily via vehicular traffic which suites the use for this site. d. Design continuity with surrounding area. Response: The proposed Progressive building is located in a commercial district near auto related uses. e. Maximize visibility to discourage crime Response: The building is sited well with clear space around the building. Decorative fencing is provided to protect customer ready cars overnight. f. Provide access control using physical barriers such as bollards and fences. Response: Refer to civil plans for access. Access controls are provided for secured cars only. Open access to site is maintained during business hours. Access around the facility is maintained at all times accept for the secured parking area which protects customer cars ready for pick up. g. Does the design reflect site ownership through the use of fences, paving, signage and landscape features. Response: Ownership of the project is defined with building signage, site landscaping defining the limits of the developed site. 2. Surface parking lots a. Use of landscaping to protect and preserve property values. Response: Refer to the Landscape plan for compliance. b. Vehicle turning should be minimized. Response: Refer to site plan attached automobile clearances and turnings and circulation are evident and clear for customer and employee use. c. Driveways should be visible from the right of way. Response: Our driveway is visible and accessed from South 340th street and also visible from Pacific Highway 99. d. N/A e. N/A 3. N/A 4. Pedestrian Circulation and Public Spaces a. Primary entrances should be visible from the right of way. Response: Refer to civil plans primary entrance is visible. b. Pedestrian pathways and areas should be delineated by texture and color in the paving surface. Response: Refer to civil plans for pedestrian pathways. c. N/A d. Bicycle racks should be provided. RICHARD L. BOWEN + ASSOCIATES INC. Mr. Matt Herrera City of Federal Way June 61h12013 Response: Refer plans attached indicating Forms and Surfaces type bike rack (Bike Garden) located at the north east island at the front of the building. Refer to civil plan for location. e. Outdoor furniture, fixtures and streetscape should be incorporated into the site design. Response: A seating bench is proposed to be provided at the pedestrian plaza and will have a light grey finish to compliment the building curtain wall finish. Site lighting fixtures, decorative fencing will have black finish to compliment the building site. 5. Landscaping a. See attached landscaping design guidelines Response: Refer to landscape plans for compliance. 6. Commercial Service Facilities a. Commercial services should be located to minimize visibility of trash, storage and recycling areas. Trash and recycling receptacles shall be covered. Response: Refer to plans attached indicating a brick enclosed trash and recycling enclosure that will house covered trash and recycling dumpsters. Decorating fencing materials to match the security fence will be provided for further screening of the dumpsters. The location is set back from the entrance drive and Pacific highway. b. Site utilities such as transformers should not be in the front landscape Response: Refer to landscape plan the proposed transformer location will be screened from view with landscaping. 7. Misc. Site Elements a. Site lighting shall not spill into adjacent properties. Lighting shall be provided in all loading, storage and circulation area but will have cut-off shields. Response: Refer to attached photometric plan all fixtures lighting site have full cut-off feature. 19.115.060 Building Design (Refer to Architectural design intent for further description) Regarding compliance with Building design, based on the design intent narrative provided above we believe we have addressed the general criteria (1) based on the building's siting and context of the commercial area along with the selection of complimentary materials and colors for the building and site amenities. We believe the intent of the Building Facade modulation (2)(a) is met through the contemporary use of materials and depth of forms, materials and colors that define the building's entrance use and function. We believe that the 2'-0 overhang that provides protection and shade for the office ribbon curtain wall windows along with the well-defined drop-off and pick—up entrance canopy, meets the design intent of (2)(c) as a modulation option. A small entry Pedestrian plaza has been developed that will include a dark grey colored scored concrete finish, bench, along with landscaping features to compliment the front entrance design with the selected building materials meeting requirements of 2(d). Through the use of different materials, horizontal panels with vertical reveals, corner detailing, overhangs, and canopies provided, we believe we also meet the intent of the requirements outlined in (3)b methods to articulate blank walls. The front elevation faces South 3401h street and has a stepped design where the entrance canopy is stepped forward from the building, approx. 2'-8" in front of the raised building main entrance feature. The entrance canopy consists of prefinished white panels that RICHARD L. BOWEN + ASSOCIATES INC. r� Mr. Matt Herrera City of Federal Way June 6`1'12013 surround and shadow a horizontal curtain wall feature for a pedestrian visual into the entrance lobby. The main entrance feature, which is the design element for the building identification sign, is the next feature that steps forward from the office portion of the building approx. 8" and is clad with a prefinished metallic grey color which compliments the building base brick color. The remaining portion of the elevation has a light grey horizontal panel that provides a 1'-10" soffit overhang for the horizontal ribbon window and brick base below. The south elevation as the described in the design intent narrative has two distinct forms a brick clad inspection bay (enclosed garage) and office function which is approx. 69' in front of the office elevation. The inspection bay has a dark grey base brick and a lighter grey brick to compliment the light gray panels where the building forms meet. The light grey horizontal panels provide a 1'-10" overhang for the curtain wall ribbon windows office function of the building. The building is tied together with the dark brick base typical. A prefinished white overhead door enters the inspection bay wash bay at this elevation. The white canopy feature is approx. at the east side of this elevation is 69' back from the inspection bay brick form and marquee features is approx. 110' back from the same face. A blue progressive sign is proposed on the light grey panels as described in the design intent above. The west elevation faces Pacific Highway south. The forward feature of this building houses the business office of the space and continues the horizontal theme of the form from the North elevation. The light grey horizontal prefinished metal panel provides an approximate V- 10" overhang over the ribbon curtain wall windows and brick base. The stepped features of the front canopy and sign feature can be seen beyond which is approx. 115' feet from the front face of this elevation. The brick clad inspection bay portion of the building is set back approx. 75' from the front faced at the southern portion of the building. A prefinished white overhead door exits the inspection bay at this elevation. The east elevation faces the existing open storm water feature and is a side elevation where the white canopy feature is approximately 50' in front of the covered lobby entrance. The lobby entrance has a stepped 14' high curtain wall feature along with the light grey horizontal panel feature which steps down to the vestibule entrance. The curtain wall provides clear definition of entry and building service function. The building then steps back again approx. 7-4" and transitions to the brick clad inspection bay fagade. A prefinished white overhead door enters the inspection bay is shown at this elevation. 19.115.070 Building, and Pedestrian Orientation We believe our building as presented meets the design intent of this section. 1. (a) Building should generally be oriented to rights of way... Response: As described in the design intent the building is oriented for the employee, customer and pedestrian use. (b) Plazas, public open spaces.. Response: A small pedestrian plaza has been provided along the pedestrian access rout to the front enrance (c) All buildings adjacent to street should provide visual access.. Response: as described above visual access to the building entrance and lobby from the street is evident for compliance. (d) NA. 19.115.090 District Guidelines Community Business District: We believe our building as presented meets the design intent of this section and address subparts (a),(b),(c) and (e). Items (f) through (s) do not apply. The pedestrian access is clearly visible from the street and is defined with separated paved routs from the rights of way. Bicycle racks are provided along the pedestrian access rout in front of RICHARD L. BOWEN + ASSOCIATES INC. : Mr. Matt Herrera City of Federal Way June 61h12013 the building. A bench is shown to be provided at the small pedestrian plaza as described above. Please consider this design intent narrative along with responses and information provided, that the submission provides a successful response to the Community Design Guidelines. n c Please call me at 216.377.3875 with any questions you may have. Sincerely, RICHARD L. BOWEN + ASSOCIATES INC. Michael F. Woods, RA Principal Enclosures cc: Sean McDermottZaremba (Ltr. via E-mail) Amanda Bell, Progressive (Ltr. via E-mail) Kevin McGrath, Progressive (Ltr. via E-mail) RI CHARD L. BOWEN + ASSOCIATES INC. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Web date: 04/26/2007 SEWER AVAILABILITY: }LING COLINTY CERTIFICATE OF ✓ SEWER AVAILABILITY For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. This certificate provides the Public Health - Seattle & King County Department and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Do not write in this box Number ❑ Building Permit ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD ✓ ,Rezone or other: Applicant's name: C45L& {� Proposed use: CQ /JLANEIg —AAA1_ r el ✓ Location (attach map and legal description if necessary): 3�foot Name PActf-Lc_ RL,�4 S aoacoLfC:�&s( Sewer agency information: i/ 1. a. Sewer servicecan be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing 12 I► c1i p1AM.size sewer 0(Q- S 1 . and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. OR ❑ b. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; and/or The construction of a collection system on the site; and/or Other (describe): 2. a. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. OR ❑ b. The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. ✓ 3.. 0 a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city. OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: a. Connection charge: D CNu c.L) LPe lst b. Easement(s): A 5 KE OU I. ZFd`�- c. Other: <C ER 96-1,Q k69 QPQA] aG T►d,a PE n 1` - � E Call E,D * The District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay or deny sewer service based upon capacity limitations in District and Other Purveyor facilities. * I certify that the above sewer agency information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year frRECteF.oIVED signature. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT Agency name Title sewer availability form.doc b-cert-sewer..pdf t a JUN ® 7 2013 Signatory arrle My PF WAY Signature SDate CZt�3 02-07-2002 Page 1 of 1 - o eq U�1LrITY T]iSTgl� Sewer Availability Map Sewer Main ......•• Sewer Manholes Development Engineering NOTE: Lakehaven Utility District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of any facility information shown. Facility locations and conditions are subject to field verification. Vveb date: M21312007 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 WATER AVAILABILITY: DING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY17-11 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. This certificate provides the Public Health - Seattle & King County Department and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals; Do not write in this box Number ❑ Building Permit ❑ Short Subdivision ✓ Applicant's name: ✓ Proposed use: ✓ 2. ✓ 3. k1 4. Name ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD ✓FJ Rezone or other: Location (attach map and legal description if necessary):3H Odl ►9~?IJZoa(o�F a. Wate, can be provided by service connection only to an existing lyl&," DIA- I (size) water main that is 41^ zo feet from the site. OR b. Water service will fequlm an improvement to the water system of: IN(1) f`^ 2- Q feet of water main to reach the slte; and/or s O� * (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or I F AO 100 NYQIZ M (3) Other (describe): VMC PK071WCT?4i`J VST;6m AJF- NDICAi;SD, ADEUELoP6YI MetQSlatJ . a. OR The water system is in conformance with a County, approved water comprehensive plan. ' + W►Lt- 6E 1ZE&OKA ❑ b. The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance of a permit or approval.) a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. a. Water is or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant feet from the building/property (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of flow at Peak Demand: ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) ❑ 500 io 999 gpm ❑ .1000 gpm or more ❑ flow test of gpm IM calculation of E50 d gpm Duration. ❑ less than i hour ❑ 1 hour to 2 hours * 2 hours or more Other: S&=- XIA-. V t )=(,Ova: OR (Note: Commercial building permits which include multifamily structures require flow test or calculation.) ❑ b. Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. ✓ 5. a. Water system has certificates of water rights or water right claims sufficient to provide service. OR ❑ b. Water system does not currently have necessary water rights or water right claims.. Comments/conditions: W 56;SSC�VI —,12 CoNfJCz-�IafJ A} ACA-51aO AEORQ j p I certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of s LJ LAKEHAVEN UTILITS Agency name Title DISTRICT B 1 L't- �J k-,L'sC) J �LI� Q 7 2013 Signatory •ame Jr' DERAL WAY Signature ' �r/y/�2 Date 5 -.- �-^- In �s.L Pressure Zone; HighestElevationof Property Lowest_ — Zg5l310 Est. Min. Pressure Id psi Max. j The District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay or deny water service based upon capacity limitations in District and Other Purveyor facilities. Water availability form Rev. 05-19-2003 Page 1 of 1 4ti�. # aam� 0 lea}�aven �T❑ISVO �Irr Water Availability Map Water main Water service lines Hvrlrantc Development Engineering NOTE: Lakehaven Utility District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of any facility information shown. Facility locations and conditions are subject to field verification. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT Hydraulic Model Fire Flow Estimate Request/Reporting Form ---------------------------------------------------------- John Bowma % 10/20/98 I95LUDSFF.INP FF##86 Condition Pressure (psi) Flow (gpm) Static 831 0 Fire Flow 201 11900 NOTE: The fire flow analysis was performed at a Hydrant located approximately S 342"d St and Pac. Hwy S. On -site fire flow estimates would have to be determined during design of the water system improvements. This fire flow rate will cause velocities in excess of 10 f/s within the water distribution system. A fire flow rate less than 5500 gpm will maintain flow velocities below 10 f/s. A maximum fire flow rate of 2500 gpm is available. There is no guarantee that the Hydraulic Model results will represent actual system performance. Model results depict the theoretical performance of the system under high demand conditions. Field measurements should always be obtained for design purposes. n" CP 90 E6 �r 35 s�oi r ¢ r 0� m I a 4Y rf 4 r r I 13 O G.V. SHTo TEE Z Si + SD 60 — 202' 19 So ci w U 29� LOT i 1 45' ry 1 v / Lrx '1 LOT 3 / NOTE 4 1 BURIM ( ECTO CHECK V VE3 7T 12"01 I S ry 1 - in ^ _ 2-45' M F n n 37 PCL. 1 PCL. 3 CJ 1 PATf180N8 OLLUR KCS 77705 AF781 110853 Qom' R RINK 14�1111 s'�r. 12 29PCL. 4PCL. 337' 45 g}%3PCL 2 PCL. 3 KCSP 777058 AF 7812110854 ;,P`Y _vi PCL. 1 2-45' PCL. 4 r 2'_e0o WN �. 1 g Sy w 8%6 Q 28 am �_rso sQ 0ro1 �d N � E 14 1 .18 I ell 30 2_45 j,5�i, H �rlllYol►'C,i' Q M122W In RF S S. 344TH ST. a. o"Inscnas IN FEET 100 2( TN1: WY i5 num LLA71i THE LATE'. AVAuW.E MORMTM. rT L3 MERI fCR FSARNING FrU OSU ONLr p@ LJ NOT G[1,LWHTEM 10 SMW ACCURkI YGSVAIMEHIS. LLAKEH A1%/ FE i� 19 T V k A n n I I T I I 1 -r V r1 : 4Mh -r 177b I le I A PG N OFTHE BE. 114 OF THE N.E. 114 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, HANBE 04. WA6 06 I I 1 I I I I � t5 ]�' �� i 1 I I I 5 1 ! r• I � r i.• � c l,� !ram mow' i IAl , I o a _ 9 I 4 RECEIVED JUN 0 7 2013 erne: r- ev Cm ❑F FEDERAL WAY cos I PP-M Site Photo #1 A P, .. OF THESE 114 OF THE N E 1M OF SECTION W. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, PANOE 61. - W.*L 55 I ^` N I' 'PM1 7 It OLME ll�b 9Anaewan ol,:�lr+nx.n��f.a . — —•— ._......... Q 9 �+ scar 1 - per I I PP-02 Site Photo #2 AP, M OF THE S E. 114 OF THE N E 114 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE M , W.M I ------ --------- --_ ..-- —. -Y.Ss.p I • ]r .ems � �/ f� i.. 1 r � r + I 1 Baia`. 1 _ LEOENO . u SCJLLE: 1'— BP I I PP-02 Site Photo #3 A P. OFTHE S E 11. OF THE N.E. III OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH. RANGE 06. , W.K --------------------------•--`' 511 WOD kk � l -9j tit I- .. �� i ]�7 l ,,��• � � r ,: r !1 el j 7 7 j �iaw ou.f u uwu L—ND n pA,1YAHvuv.lvNn,uc n01t8 — —•— - «.�..P.,� „�. air>,. � • �_ ..�.......�.-. •.� 0 7m PP-02 Site Photo #4 AP. N OF THE SE-1140 I I t- I F THE N-E 114 OF SECTION W. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH. RANGE d1 - -WAIL kk cop k 1 r kRu •rN Y.. I ♦wr,r•��. sesspr".d �I x'rwulK rKL..�....... - -- .«.: x v r •r.. ». ate.. � — — 0 I —�. J/ 7J 1 1-1 I 1 i,dslf- j 5 f l l I r PP-02 Site Photo #5 A F '1: OF THE S E. 114 OF THE N.E 1/4 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 04 -------------------- I I If I- I cr%vT1'� o f III . 1� 07 ! r I.■ � �1 ! 1 3 l 5 �'j 5 j � I ! I I' r � ■ !f 7! .,P+'.� 1R�w�k r til �+! .,.. _il 1 i ! r r i i + r ! ! + ■ ri= ■ r ! r r r r r �d I 11a rY to ! PPL2 2 .5. Site Photo #6 A F +Y OFTHE S E 114 OF THE N.E.1/4 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH. PANOE 01 W.M. I I + I �a' Ica •h. .t'. ~ rr f ,.. ; I: .�• 9i 1 t , r r .sYS c''��� , } I � ��` - ���/~�I �- �� r r1 r+ it I+ 14 t 11 � }i + i ' 1I •'h"• '. _-, ••:V I' It , ; ; it ; ? f r , +, , i 'r' .�44TL 'p y , =�• ' kl i i j"'.y `} 1�ydt�� 1 f� � i r r I 3 T l S l r J 1 ,,� � ��� owlia� W0 Yld+4llY{IBILG •— s o a sine,•. m PP-02 z.e. Site Photo #7 AP, jN GF'TNS S E. 1M OF THE N E 1/4 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 21 NONTH, MNOE W . W!/. I - +------------------ --- - - T 1pf ,' 61h � •... '' V � 14 5 5 L 1 1 � �' r1 ! 1r I f6..jl i--- qJ f, a� I• �1 1 iwuor eeuw.e�Ec�T+o cnrul.iwu rrrcMaSwwffim •• w BGLE• Y•. GO o2f- Mawr � I PP-02 Site Photo #8 AN A OFTNE S-E- 114 OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 21 NONTN, RANGE M. . WM. z 71-7t-- "t. / r _ 1 j p•^= I PPS Site Photo #9 AP, ------------------ I I I I r: I' I I we euro 11+rNxanu¢ 9 _ ■ r ais �r Al OFTHE 9 E. 114 OF THE N.E- V4 OF SECTION M, TOWNSHIP 21 NOFITH, MNOE U1. , WJA. PP-02 Site Photo #10 AF. 1 OF THE S E 14 OF THE N.E 114 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE M :Wm da 1�a 1 3� W U Z U cc J :3 O Z W fA w� Q, a= I PP-02 Nit !Y_ Site Photo #11 A P. .N OF THE S E- 114 OF THE ME 114 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 21 NOHTH, NANOE M , W-K � � I I I i �"�!I 4. .�'` 's•�tir' si`_,5 .vim. �7•.,�r4 i'"..�G: W^�. L ! ' 5 + dd' • ' a 17f i ..J' •„'.j.l.* L- l fr 1•�5 �L � I ` N j f l.M...i = -• � I !! o f i 1' i 'f `i i f r �f � i i/./.r,y� '�� • � i �� � € �� .T.� s• o� 1' .„.. i i � I Indyy I �j I �i I � � f i + � .' S� •— 4� +! _4�.�_ •�*-: .. _ _ l i 5� •I � 1 l 4} 1 f i 1 !l / I Q w 1' .r'.•.'� I 51r. I } w �r! - �' �'.�'� ti ��! {—� I rr + I /' r j j r � 1 t�^ ���n � � ccLLJ Z ansisoFe¢wgmc �EasNo ! ....� ..��... yn It W LL WTMANaawawt�HltllolGll�..mce ....• �.- •,�`•_ f I`1 O CL ! •' aC✓11C• Oa TPP-02 Site Photo #12 A F. JN OF THE S 1- 1/4 OF THE N-E, 1/4 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE O/, : wm. s If Site Photo #13 Progressive Insurance Claim Center Vicinity Maps Easter Lake s �trr,r sr - ---_-SW_312TH St .Swrr"-$T—� —iL .1T37}f ST S 31401 ST 4 SYY,fdrlf pl 9YV JIdTH $T -=3 320TH ST-- -. rL s_Marl.sx�--fit I.3 ssxosrr 11' aw AUTt1 ST 8Co. SW 3mrH ST yf SW 331ST Sr S T�M ST / { .-; ao $93[TfsST s333Tri ST Cl PantherLakep I, sanarrt + ce) eo S 9T STD f++larlake y } ; c a OrI M SW 354T1t ST �a o Brraak-Lake ,� � O C � I f �7 5339rfTST sVr7r h _��_ i•ITN-9T N 1 sGr 46 �a�� ` sw 366rH sr (� � S aWf, sr , ^ sV3aanr sr a �a � c I � 1 i S riTS[T $ Fiver lle Lakes r w f '` N ��•` sR saFfsTtx I� , 'j- 1�5 A tc12007irer,gCfxxr-:� :G-sue D si ^` U 2394t1 Legend — I 'County Boundary littrxy RECEIVED T Mountain Peaks Highways '-° JUN 0 7 '2013 Ar Urban Growth Area Line E� Lakes and Large Rivers Streams CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Streets CDS (cont) The information induded on this map has been compUe6 by Keg Gaunty stall from a variety of sources and Is subject to changa without nonce- King County makes no repra&mtaflons orwarrandes, express ar rmpGed. &a to accuracy, camplelenass, trr. ass. or Tights to the use of such information. This document Is not intended for use as a survey product. Klrrg County shag not b6 liable for any general, s 01. Indirect, InGdontal, or consequential L-9 •damages Including, but not Ilmited Io. lost revenues or lost profits resulting ham the usa or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale orKing County this map or Information on this map is prohlbiled except byvailtan permission of King Ccumly. Date: 5/2212013 Source: King County [MAP - Property Information (httpJ/www.mafkc.goulGI&MMAP) '4k CITY 10';:tSP OF Federal Way F,ECEIV E® SUN 0 7 20i3 Y CITY OF FEDERAL WA MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF CommuNrrV DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8 h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.ciLyotfederalway.com 5 ` f _ Z%3 " /D�50-00 -SE APPLICATION NO(S) t O T t `� Date May 10, 2013 Project Name Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office Property Address/Location 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Parcel Number(s) 2021049051 Project Description The proposal is for a new Pro essive Insurance Reidonal Claims Office. The building will be a single story 16,973 SF office for approximately 74 em lovees. Primacy access will be fro Pacific Hi way South via an extension of a road S 340'h at the intersection of Pacific Highway and 16t°' Ave S. PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) X Process III (Project Approval) X Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision w Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information Commercial EnteMrise {Zoning Designation Commercial Enterprise Comp Plan Designation $991.400 Value of Existing Improvements $3 50� 0 000 Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Business Group_B Occupancy Type 2B non-combustible Construction Type Applicant Name: Zaremba Group, LLC Attn: Sean McDermott Address: 14600 Detroit Ave City/State: Lakewood, OH Zip: 44107 Phone: (216) 838-6113 x163 Fax: N/A Email: smcdermott zareraba ou .com Signature Agent (if d; er.odthan Applicant) Name: ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC Attn: Eric LaBrie, AICP Address: 33400 8t' Ave South City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98003 Phone: (253) 838-6113 Fax: (253) 838-7104 Email: eric.iabrieAesmcivil.corn Signature: Owner Name: Progressive Casualty Insurance Comp. Attn: Kevin McGrath Address: 5920 Landerbrook Drive, Bldg III City/State: Mayfield Heights, OH Zip: 44124 Phone: (440) 603-7079 Fax: N/A Email: N/A Signature:, Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 2 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application Corporate Real Estate 5920 Landerbrook Dr. Building H — L32A401 Mayfield Hts., OH 44124 September 4, 2013 Cary M. Roe, P.E. Director of Parks, Public Works and Emergency Management City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development — Planning Division 33325 8th Ave. S Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Proposed Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office Dedication of S. 3401h St. Mr. Roe, We are in receipt of the Public Works Traffic Division comments of August 151, 2013 regarding the Proposed Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office. Additionally, we appreciate the time spent by your staff with our developer on August 22"d to further explain the comments and work towards a resolution of all items. Of particular concern is the comment stating that S. 340'h Street will remain a private road until such time our northern neighbor develops their property. This comment came as a surprise to us. When this project was first approved in 2006, S. 3401" St. was to be constructed by Progressive and public right-of-way dedicated to the City of Federal Way. Additionally, at pre -application meetings held on June 14, 2012 and January 31, 2013 it was understood that Progressive would construct and dedicate S. 340ih St. At no point was there any discussion regarding S. 340h St. remaining private for any period of time. Due to the expectation communicated during the 2006 project, and at both pre -application meetings we have been in negotiations with our northerly neighbor. They have been cooperative and are a good partner in achieving a full width construction of S. 340"' Street and dedication of such. The negotiations that we have undertaken with our neighbor have not considered S. 340'h St. remaining as a private drive. If S. 340'h St. were to remain as private it is highly unlikely that our neighbors would cooperate, which would complicate matters significantly Lastly, in our request asking for your consideration to accept S. 340`h St. we would like you to consider that 1) S. 3401h St. is depicted on the approved Federal Way Village Master Plan as a public street and 2) Progressive Insurance is making a multi -million dollar investment in the City of Federal Way of not just capital and increased employment base, but in public infrastructure. Based on the above justifications we respectfully request that the City rescind this comment and accept S. 3400' St. as a public right- of-way upon completion of construction. We look forward to hearing from you and thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to contact myself at 440-603-7079 or our developer, Zaremba Group, at 216-221-2163 with any concerns or questions. Sincerely Kevin P. McGrath Manager of Development CC: Sean McDermott — Zaremba Group Eric Labrie — ESM Engineers RESUBMITTED SEP 2 5 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS September20, 2013 Job No.1770-001-013 Mr. Matthew Herrera Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave. South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: File #13-102511-00-UP; Technical Comment Letter Response Progressive Claims Office, 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Herrera: Thank you so much for your initial review of the Regional Progressive Claims Office Process IV Master Land Use Application. In your letter dated July 26, 2013 you requested several clarifications and revisions be made to the Proposal. In addition to your letter, we received comments from Sarady Long in a memo dated August 1, 2013. Subsequently, two meetings were held to discuss the comments and establish mutually beneficial solutions for the project This letter and accompanying materials will serve as a formal resubmittal to address the issues as they were raised in the letters and meetings. Below you will find that I have broken our responses into two sections. Section one will address comments received in your letter dated July 26, 2013. Section two will focus primarily on transportation comments and issues as found in the memo from Sarady Long dated August 1, 2013. As a general format I have copied your original comments in italics and have provided our responses in Bold. Section I - Responses to Letter slated July 26 2013 In the opening paragraph of your letter you reference the proposed building with a square footage that is no longer accurate. The square footage of the proposed building is 17,105 SF. Please revise all city documentation as necessary to reflect the correct square footage. Zoning and .and Use 1. Elevation Drawing - Sheet DD3.1 is not accurately scaled at 1/8-1 Please resubmit a scaled elevation drawing. N The scale has been verified and the plans have been reprinted' CT 10 2013 you. Please find them included In this resubmittal. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ESM Federal Way 33600 6ih AvE S. SIC 205 ESM Everett 1010 SE Everett Mall Way. Ste 210 Civil Engineering Land Planning Federal Way. WA 90003 Everett. WA 98210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture 253.f130.6113 lei 425R97.990D Iel le 3D Laser Scanning GIS 000.345.5694 toll free i15.6144101,1. www.esmeivil.com 253.839.7104fax 425.297.9901 fax Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 2 2. Exterior Materials - Please provide a color rendition of the building's exterior material. Color renditions of the architect's plans are Included In this resubmlttal. 3. Secured Parking - Please provide details of the proposed canopy structure in the secured parking area Details of the proposed canopy structure In the secured parldng area have been prepared and are included In this resubmittal. 4. Pedestrian Clearance - Parking lot design criteria (Bulletin #42) requires fore feet of unobstructed pathway clearance pursuant to FWRC 19.130.160(2). Please provide wheel stops for parking stalls adjacent to five -foot -wide pedestrian connection on east side of building. Wheel stops have been added to the plans as necessary to allow five feet of unobstructed pathway clearance. Please see the revised Site Development plans. 5. Pedestrian Connections - Per FWRC 19.115.050(4)(b), approved methods of delineation for pedestrian connections through the asphalt parking lot include: stone, brick or granite pavers; exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete. Please indicate pedestrian connection materials. The pedestrian connections will be comprised of stamped and colored concrete and a note has been added to the plans to reflect this. 6. Building Facade Modulation and Screening Options - FWRC 19.115.060(2) requires facades in excess of 60 feet and visible from rights -of --way and residential zones to implement at least two of the following four treatments. a Facade modulation. Minimum depth: two feet; minimum width. six feet; maximum width: 60 feet Alternative methods to shape a building, such as angled or curved facade elements, off -set planes, wing walls and terracing, will be considered; provided, that the intent of this section is met. b. Landscape screening. Eight foot -wide Type 11 landscape screening along the base of the facade, except Type iV may be used in place of Type 11 for facades that are comprised of 50 percent or more window area, and around building entrance(s). e Canopy or arcade As a modulation option, canopies or arcades may be used only along facades that are visible from a right-of- way. Minimum length. 50 percent of the length of the facade and extend at least 6 feet from the building. Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 3 d. Pedestrian plaza. Size of plaza: Plaza square footage is equal to one percent of the gross floor area of the building, but it must be a minimum of 200 square feet The plaza should be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. If more than two options are used on a single facade, the dimensional requirements for each option will be determined on a case -by -case basis; provided, that the gross area of a pedestrian plaza may not be less than 200 square feet Please clarify how the north east, southand west facades meet the two -of -four re airement In a meeting on August 22nd this requirement was discussed at length. The following treatments were agreed upon by City staff and Progressive: North - A bench will be added the proposed pedestrlan plaza. This has been shown on the plans. Otherwise the vertical terracing that Is part of the structure will suffice for facade modulation. East - On the northern half of the east elevation the terracing will suffice. On the southern half an 8' type II landscape screen has been added. South - On the eastern half of the south elevation the terracing will suffice. On the western half of the southern elevation the landscaping will be increased by 3 feet to meet the 8' type II landscape screen The plans have been revised to show this change. In addition to the landscaping two bumpouts along the wall have been added to meet the facade modulation requirement Please see the revised site plans. West - No additional treatments will be required. These changes can be seen on the site development plans. 7. Wellhead Protection - As the total landscaped area exceeds 10,000 square feet, FWRC 19.185.070 requires a management plan for any pesticide and/or herbicides that will potentially be used for the long term care of the development's landscaping. Please provide an operations and management manual using best management practices (BMPs) and integrated pest management (IPM) for fertilizer and pesticide/herbicide applications. The BMPs shall include recommendations on the quantity, timing, and type of fertilizers applied to lawns and gardens to protect groundwater quality. An operations and management manual will be provided In Section 10 of the Final TIR for this project The O&M manual will Include a Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 4 section on BMPs for an Integrated pest management plan for fertilizer and pesticide/herbicide applications. 8. Perimeter Landscaping - FWRC 19125.060(9)(a) requires Type M landscaping along property lines abutting rights -of -way. Type Ill landscaping is defined as a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees interspersed with large shrubs and groundcover. Please add two to three evergreen trees along the Pacific Hwy South frontage requirement of "..evergreen and deciduous trees interspersed." Two additional evergreen trees have been added along the Pacific Highway South frontage. Please see the revised landscape plans. 9. Tree Canopy Requirements - FWRC 19.120.130(2) requires development in the CE zone to provide at least 20 tree units per acre. As the area outside of the permanent easement contains little or no tree coverage, standards will be met via new planting. All trees within perimeter and parking lot landscaping are eligible for tree unit credits Only the area outside of the permanent easement will be counted toward the tree unit calculation. Please provide a tree retention plan that identifies how the development meets tree canopy standards. The proposed development encompasses appro)dmately 3.75 acres on the eastern most end of the total 8.27 acres of parcel 202104- 9051. The area we are worldng in contains little or no vegetation so the applicant will need to plant trees to meet the 20 Tree Units per acres requirement as stated above. At 3.75 acres and a requirement of 20 trees per acre the applicant will have to plant 75 trees. The current landscape plan proposes 104 trees to be planted In the perimeter and parldng areas. This proposed number of trees meets the requirement of FWRC 19.120.130(2) and no additional planting is proposed. Please accept the landscape plans as the tree retention plan for this project 10. Wetland Buffer Encroachment - Please provide a written response to the five modification criteria listed in FWRC 19.175.040(6)(a) through (e). Please see the revised Wetland Report that Includes the discussion of the five modification criteria. Stormwater and Englneerirrq The TiR indicates that Basic Water Quality treatment will be provided. The site lies within an Enhanced Basic Water Quality treatment area. The engineer shall revise the TIR and plans to reflect this requirement The TIR and plans have been revised to reflect the Enhanced Basic Water Quality treatment area requirements. Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 5 2. The water quality vault that serves Road A shall be located on the Progressive property. The water quality vault for S 340P St has been relocated entirely onto the Progressive property. Please see the revised site plans. 3. The storm drain outfall locations (Sheet CP-06) within the small sediment pond are not an approved discharge point The 2 outfall pipes should be tightlined to the storm drain conveyance system on the property to the north of the site. An easement shall be provided for the system on the adjacent property. Prior to any engineering or permit approvals, a copy of any drainage easements shall be provided to the City. If the applicant cannot obtain a drainage easement over this system, a new discharge location will have to be provided. It has been determined by the client that the best course of action will be to abandon the plan of releasing our stormwater to the pond to the north All stormwater for the site and off -site road will be collected and conveyed west Into the Kitts Comer Regional Storm Detention Facility. This change will require an additional temporary encroachment Into the wetland buffer for construction. Please see the revised site development plans and the update wetland report addressing the additional encroachment A permanent easement over the storm drainage line has been shown on the plans. 4. The overhead utility lines that are located on the poles along the Pacific Highway South frontage shall be placed underground as part of the street improvement construction. This will be deferred as part of the Improvements that the City has planned for Pacific Highway. Progressive will not be Installing any frontage improvements at the request of the City. Instead, Progressive will be provide a fair share payment for the eventual construction of frontage Improvements. 5. The landscape plan shall show the planter strip on South 340"' Street (Road "A"). The street trees shown are for a 6-1ooi wide planter strip. This is a 4-foot planter strip; therefore, the street trees shall be provided from the list provided on City Standard Detail 3-48. Per your comment, the landscape plans have been revised to show the street trees for a 4 foot planter. 6. Street trees shall be shown in the planter strip on Pacific Highway South. The trees shall be provided from detail 3-48, listed specifically under `Pacific Highway: Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 6 No street trees will be planted In the planter strip on Pacific Highway South as no Improvements are proposed on Pacific Highway. All frontage Improvements will be deferred and covered by a fee In lieu of construction. Water/Sewer Completeness Comments - Applicant has completed and submitted to Lakehaven an application for Certificates of Availability, and Lakehaven issued those Certificates on 512113. However, as previously noted, applicant will need to submit to Lakehaven an application for either Developer Pre -Design Meeting or Developer Extension Agreement for Lakehaven to formally commence the water and/or sewer plan review process. Lakehaven continues to encourage owners/developers/applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes (as appropriate) separately to Lakehaven, early in the pre- design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development This comment has been noted and Progressive will apply for a Developer's Extension Agreement as part of the formal site development process. SEPA Comment - Applicant has not addressed the likelihood for new water main greater than 8-inch diameter in the SEPA Checklist If water main greater than 8-inch diameter is ultimately required and is not sufficiently addressed in the initial SEPA checklist and approval, a separate SEPA process may be required prior to authorizing construction of any new water system facilities. The SEPA Checklist has been updated to reflect the possibility of a new water main of 8 Inches In diameter or larger. Please see the revised SEPA Checklist, Section 11- Responses to Traffic Memo dated August 1 2013 1. Provide conceptual S 340th Street alignment and how it would extend north in the future to connect with 13th Pl S and S 336th Street intersection. As shown, it appears that the proposed road would impact the existing detention pond on the west side of the property and may not align with the Federal Way Village's conceptual design. A conceptual alignment was submitted to the City of Federal Way In the meeting that took place on August 22, 2013. In a follow up email dated August 23, 2013 from Kevin Peterson, it was determined that a 185 foot radius with a 25 mph design speed would be acceptable to the City. Progressive accepts that alignment and has confirmed the alignment with Federal Way Village. Please see the revised site development plans. 2. The new S 340th Street road west of SR 99 would need to remain as a private street until such time the property to the north develop. The new road shall be set aside as a Tract Xu until such time the property to the north develop or as deemed necessary by the City to be deeded. Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 7 A formal request is being submitted with this letter requesting that the City accept the dedication of S 34e Street at this time. Pending approval of this request the plans reflect that S 340" St will be dedicated and not set aside as a Tract "W . 3. Signal Improvement at SR 9915 340th St intersection - The SR 99 Phase 5 TIP project from S 340'h Street to S 356th Street is currently under design. Any improvements to this intersection may need to be reconstructed as the preferred option has not been determined yet As such, the city is proposing two options to minimize improvement cost to applicant and still preserve full access onto SR 99. 1) OPTION A (Recommended) - Limited access at the SR 991S 340th Street intersection and a new full access driveway south of the intersection. Under this option, access at the signalized intersection would be limited to right -in and right -out and westbound in from 16th Ave S only. There will be minor signal modification at SR 9915 340th St intersection to be designed and constructed by the applicant Please note, the new driveway on SR 99 may be restricted to right -in and right -out or close -off in the future with the completion of the SR 99 Phase 5 HOV project. 2) OPTION B - Full signal modification at the SR 991S 340th Street intersection with no new southerly driveway access onto SR 99. This option would require considerable signal modification to all applicable standards and will be constructed by the applicant as well. Upon further review of the two options and based on discussions with the City, Progressive would like to proceed with Option S. Full signal modifications are being prepared and will be submitted to the City and WSDOT. Recognizing that the Improvements could potentially be removed as part of the future SR 99 plans, Progressive will make some efforts to position signals In a way that would allow the maximum potential for being Incorporated Into future designs. It Is understood that with the full signal modification the site will have full access from all directions In and out off of Pacific Hwy and 16'�' Ave S. Furthermore, It Is understood that no additional access will be necessary onto Pacific Hwy. 4. Frontage Improvement on SR 99 - The required frontage improvement on SR 99 is part of a larger TIP project (TIP#20 SR 99 HOV lanes Phase 5), which is currently under design and scheduled for construction. As such, the Public Works director has elected to have the applicant fulfill the required frontage improvement (FWRC 19.135.030) obligation by paying to the city the pro-rata share of the costs of the required improvements calculated on a per-froni foot basis Based on the estimated per linear foot cost of $1,406 and 270' of linear frontage, the total pro-rata share is $379, 700. This is an estimate only and subject to change. In lieu of using Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 8 the city per front -foot basis estimate, the applicant may submit the actual engineering costs estimate for the frontage improvements to the Public Works Department for review and approval. In the meeting held on August 22, 2013 It was determined that the above estimate was Inaccurate and a subsequent email from Sarady Long dated August 13, 2013 contained a revised draft frontage Improvement cost estimate. Progressive recognizes the draft frontage Improvement cost estimate provided by the City as being closer to accurate but reserves the right to submit the actual engineering costs estimate for the frontage Improvements to the Public Works Department for review and approval. 5. The signal plan must be reviewed and approved by the City and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The plans that were prepared for WSDOT have been submitted to Sarady Long for review and he has provided comments to Kevin Collins of Transpo Group. This process Is on -going and will be completed as part of final engineering and design. 6. The applicant may be able to receive credit for system improvements along SR 99 to be applied toward the impact fee. Credit request for the value of the dedicated land, improvements, or construction will be determined by the Public Works director on a case -by -case basis. Please refer to AWRC 19 91.090. Progressive acknowledges the ability to request credit for the value of the dedicated land, Improvements, and fee In lieu of frontage Improvements to be applied toward the traffic Impact fee. Progressive will seek those credits as the project moves forward. 7. Assuming a symmetrical cross section, the depicted 12' ROW dedication on SR 99 will fit the planned Type "A' street Please note, there may be additional ROW impacts with the SR 99 Phase 5 project We acknowledge this comment and understand that additional ROW could be required by the City for the SR 99 Phase 5 project. In the event additional ROW is necessary the City will compensate Progressive accordingly. 8. Streetlight plan must include power source, service cabinet location, conduit size, j-boxes, line loss calculations, etc. Please see attached streetlight checklist The Streetlight Plan will show all of the above as the project moves through final engineering after the Process IV Land Use approval. Mr. Mathew Herrera September 20, 2013 Page 9 9. Pole numbering shall be per Standard Drawing 3-39B (Luminaim Pale Numbering). Pole numbering will be provided on engineering plans after the Process IV Land Use approval. 10. Payment of Traffic impact fee payment estimated $82,600 prior to the issuance of Building Permit The TIF may be adjusted to account for the total value of system improvements, including dedications of land, improvements and/or construction provided by the applicant Credit request for the value of the dedicated land, improvements, or construction will be determined by the Public Works director on a case -by -case basis The applicant must submit the credit request prior to the TIF payment. See FWRC 19.91.090. The traffic Impact fee will be paid by the applicant prior to the Issuance of a building permit And prior to the payment of the 11F the applicant will submit a credit request as needed to account for the land dedications, and fee -In -lieu for the frontage Improvements. Thank you for your time in reviewing these resubmitted materials. If anything else is required, or if you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me immediately. Sincerely, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC A ann Project Planner Enclosures CC: Sean McDermott 11esm81eng AesmAobs11770100110131documenriltr-0OB.doc ��� IMA SC 4k 44A, 9 JEW) H o0 ro ro ;O CL G•31 �7 n= o a 2 d 7 3 3 �� N r7r.w co m s o 0 o ►� n'� po �A, 3 ,`^ N m m a D a a' c �p ❑ may- 'D CD G (Art' ❑ 'A •-• 5 E CD Grit C1 y 0 CD _ DJ t�9CD o C. CD cap. C) M - T N -n CD CD to O n Ci Cn Ln :Ca o :C7 .Cis v cn 1 C7 rr N ro CL 0 , EL N CD N C� j n ro F.m ;m w •co o rn Cb €i toq � N G M W .�G-. L � 1 � ,� a. S 1 CHi :a ip • C7 1%, CCA A1' 71-- p �'aa a1 I Cl • 5. Elm ,1 0 lu:= n ::3 P, `3 N (a• N d 03 �I ao a N Fll) .O �� VI o. Q M c m O Q E n 'E y 0 0 0 sR�a 6 1 'n CD 0 o sLn p C d P O O C>1.9 FD a I� a� C r I [ nf Sf Is � F 1ta CD .-I p �iC31� N ,Z7 m cA D to 2?tn� C� n ❑ x m CD eC c❑ 3 (9 s K �,'pQ �q� T m Cp _M w rp CY < CA 0 CD rL CDCQ � 3 LL 7 1! L1f Lf1 W iA � �. W '= G� sv' N I G V.Cp Cry Tr wBoa CD rVii = . _ =3 r-« tv' _ CD CZ Q 1 ry N w .Tv Old C,C7 O C7:C7 y?• N N N O 0 4 ] '��O O 4P N N im d SL CC CA I Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office Preliminary Technical Information Report September 10, 2013 Prepared fur Zaremba Group. LLC 14600 Detroit Ave. Ste 1500 Cleveland, OH 44017 Prepared by j13 ESM Consulting Engineers. LLC 33400 r Avenue South, Suhe 205 Federal Way. WA 40003 RESUBMITTED 0 C T 10 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 253.038.6113 tel 253.038.7104 W "�M=- wmesmd4com Table of Contents Section 1.0 Project Overview Figure 1 TIR Worksheet Figure 2 Site Location Figure 3 Predeveloped Hydrology Map Figure 4 Developed Hydrology Map Figure 5 Soils Section 2.0 Conditions and Requirements Summary Section 3.0 Offsite Analysis Section 4.0 Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design Part A Existing Site Hydrology Part B Developed Site Hydrology Part C Performance Standards Part D Flow Control System Part E Water Quality System Section 5.0 Conveyance System Analysis and Design Section 6.0 Special Reports and Studies Section 7.0 Other Permits Section 8.0 CSWPPP Analysis and Design Section 9.0 Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries and Declaration of Covenant Section 10.0 Operations and Maintenance Manual Appendix A WWHM Output Ilesm8lengrlesm-jobs1170210011011 1documentlpreliminarytir-cup.doc Section 1.0 Proiect Overview The proposed Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office is located in the NE quarter of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington. More specifically, the project site is located at the 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, WA 98003. The King County parcel identification number is 202104-9051, totaling 8.3 acres. Refer to Figure 2 for vicinity map. Currently, the project site is undeveloped, covered with moderate brush and ground cover relatively flat with slopes from east to west towards regional wetland. See Figure 3 - Predeveloped Basin Map for details. According to the Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Geotechnical Engineering Report dated May 16, 2013 by Associated Earth Sciences Inc., the site is covered with sand and gravel recessional outwash (Qvr) over till deposits (Qvt).. See Figure 4 Soils for further detail. The proposed development will be completed on 3.22 acres including a commercial office building with parking & landscaped areas surrounding the building structure. The site is redesigned to be smaller compared to original design with the same intent. The westem 5 acres of the parcel is dedicated as a permanent easement to the City of Federal Way for the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility. The project will comply with the 2009 King County Stormwater Drainage Manual (KCSWDM), as adopted by City of Federal Way on February 16, 2010 using WWHM software instead of the original KCRTS. Stormwater runoff will be collected via catch basins and conveyed in a piped conveyance system to water quality media filtration. The western portion of site (approximately 0.33 acres) is considered as "high use" area and will be provided with a coalescing plate oil/water separator to meet the treatment goal prior to entering the water quality media filtration. From there it will continue to flow into the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility. See Section 4 for Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design. FIGURE 1 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner Kevin McGrath Phone 440-603-7079 Address 5920 Landerbrook Dr ve, Bu d ng III Maryfield Heights, OH 44424 Project Engineer Laura Bartenhagen, P.E. Company ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC Phone 253-838-6113 Part3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION ■ Landuse Services Subdivison / ShortSubd. / UPD Building Services M/F / ommerlca SFR Clearing and Grading Right -of -Way Use Other Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name Progressive nsurance Regional Claims office DDES Permit # Location Township 21 N Range 4 E Section 20 Site Address 34001 Pacific Highway South Federal Way, WA 98003 Part4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS DFW HPA Shoreline COE 404 Management DOE Dam Safety N Structural Rockery/Vault) FEMA Floodplain � ESA Section 7 COE Wetlands Other Part 5 PLAN AND REPORT INFORMATION Technical Information Report Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans) Type of Drainage Review ( / Targeted / Type (circle one): Full / Modified / (circle): Large Site Small Site Date (include revision Date (include revision dates): dates): Date of Final: Date of Final. Part6 ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS Type (circle one): Standard / Complex / Preapplication / Experimental / Blanket Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2) Date of Approval: 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1 1/9/2009 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monitoring Required: Yes / No Describe: Start Date: Completion Date: Part 8 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Plan : City of Federal Way, King County Special District Overlays: Drainage Basin: Hylebos Creek Stormwater Requirements: Part 9 ONSITE AND ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS River/Stream Steep Slope Lake Erosion Hazard _ Wetlands Landslide Hazard Closed Depression Coal Mine Hazard Floodplain Seismic Hazard Other South 336th St. Reg ona Detent on Fac ty Habitat Protection Part 10 SOILS Soil Type Norma (No) Everett Alderwood (EwC) Slopes 0to2% 6to 15% Erosion Potential Minor Minor High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) Sole Source Aquifer Other Seeps/Springs Additional Sheets Attached 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 2 1/9/2009 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 11 DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION / SITE CONSTRAINT Core 2 — Offsite Analysis Sensitive/Critical Areas SEPA Other — 10 Additional Sheets Attached Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET rov de one TIR Summary Sheet PCF Thresho d ❑ schar e Area) Threshold Discharge Area: South 336th St. Regional Detention Facility name or description) Core Requirements (all 8 apply) Discharge at Natural Location Number of Natural Discharge Locations: Offsite Analysis Level: 1 / 2 / 3 dated: Flow Control Level: 1 / 2 / 3 or Exemption Number Rncl. facility summary sheet Small Site BMPs Conveyance System Spill containment located at: Erosion and Sediment Control ESC Site Supervisor: Contact Phone: After Hours Phone: Maintenance and Operation Responsibility: rivate / Public If Private. Maintenance Log Required: Yes / No Financial Guarantees and Provided: Yes / No Liability Water Quality Type: asic / Sens. Lake / Enhanced Basicm / Bog (include facility summary sheet) or Exemption No. Landscape Management Plan: Yes / Special Requirements as applicable) Area Specific Drainage Type: CDA / SDO / MDP 1 BP / LMP / Shared Fac. / None Requirements Name: Flood plain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major / Minor / Exemption / one 100-year Base Flood Elevation (or range): Datum: Flood Protection Facilities Describe: Source Control Describe landuse: (comm./industrial landuse) Describe any structural controls: 2009 Surface Water Design Manual _ 1/9/2009 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Oil Control High -use Site: Yes / No Treatment BMP: c cing Plate oillwater separator Maintenance Agreement: Yes / No with whom? Other Drainage Structures Describe: Part 13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION Clearing Limits Stabilize Exposed Surfaces Cover Measures Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Perimeter Protection Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris, Ensure Traffic Area Stabilization Operation of Permanent Facilities Sediment Retention Flag Limits of SAO and open space Surface Water Collection preservation areas Other Dewatering Control Dust Control Flow Control Part 14 STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS (Note: Include Facility Su mary and Sketch Flow Control Type/Description Water Quality Type/Description Detention Infiltration Regional Facility Shared Facility Flow Control BMPs Other _ ""h St Regional Detention Biofiltration Wetpool � Media Filtration Oil Control Spill Control Flow Control BMPs Other coalescing plate oil/water 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009 KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON_ SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 15 EASEMENTSITRACTS Part 16 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Drainage Easement �I Covenant Native Growth Protection Covenant Tract LN Other I Part 17 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Cast in Place Vault Retaining Wall Rockery -- 4' High Structural on Steep Slope Other I, or a civil engineer under my supervision, have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attached Technical Information Report. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate13 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 5 1i912009 Figure 2 Site Location - Vicinity Map 4 In m U) 4 S t] S . ` Q 336T�+ STREET � ly IN i- UI > [a f r Gj Y U ❑ 1� C .349TN STREET REGIONAL_ DETENTION FACILITY ,R �a l co �l n J SCALE: 1" = 60' J 0 30' 80' Li D 0 T- LU T- J N W F- Z W U Lu 'W 0 VJ U c z W Q O Z I W w W T � V 0 Ir IL o p � IC po c a cd o � ® p apa J J LB N N _n ai 3 E r m to! 9 0 ca > � �V m E m � 3 c �P3 c �d m 3 m Ua o Section 2,0 Conditions and Re uirements Summary Review of Eight Care Re uirements anri Five S ecial Re uirements The proposed project has been reviewed in accordance with the Core and Special Requirements in Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of the 2009 KCSWDM for a full drainage review of the proposed for Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office. The conclusions determined by evaluating the Eight Core Requirements and Five Special Requirements area as follows: Core Rec luirement No. 1 - Discha ie at the Natural Location Runoff from the existing site sheet flows to the west. In the developed condition, runoff from the site is proposed to discharge west into the South 3361h Regional Detention Facility. Core Re uirement Na. 2 - Offsite Anal sis The Level One Offsite Analysis was completed on May 10, 2005, by William E. Stevens from Triad Associates. We believe that the upstream and downstream corridors have not changed significantly since this date and the associated field visit is still appropriate for the purpose of the Level 1 downstream analysis. Furthermore, no additional drainage complaints were recorded. Core Requirement No. 3 -Flew Control Since the project proposes to directly discharge into the South 336t" Regional Detention Facility no onsite detention is required. See Section 4 - Flow Control and Water Quality. Core Requirement No. 4 - Conveyance System The proposed stormwater conveyance system will consist of stormwater generated from the proposed site sheet flow along road and collected via nearby catch basins and flow through underground pipes. The underground pipe network is designed to flow toward water quality media filtration facility and ultimately flow toward South 336 h Regional Detention Facility located adjacent to the site. The stormwater drainage conveyance system will be sized to convey the 25 year design storm event and to contain the 100 year design storm event. A detail Conveyance System analysis and design will be provided with the final TIR. Core Requirement No. 5 Erosion and Sediment Control The Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) Design will be shown on the final construction plans and additional information will be provided with the final TIR. Core Requirement No. 6 Maintenance and Operations Maintenance and operation of the privately maintained system will remain the responsibility of the property owner. For more information on maintenance and operations, see Section 10.0 of this report. Core Requirement No. 7 Financial Guarantees and Liabili All drainage facilities constructed or modified for projects (except downspout infiltration and dispersion systems) must comply with the financial guarantee requirements as provided in the King County Bond Quantities Worksheet. This information is further discussed in Section 9.0 of this report. Core Requirement No. 8 Water Quality All proposed projects must provide water quality (WQ) facilities to treat the runoff from new and/or replace pollution -generating impervious surfaces and pollution - generating pervious surfaces. The developed site requires enhance basic water quality treatment, because it is a commercial site. Based on the attached Section 1.2.8.1 Exception 4 of the 2009 KCSWDM, the enhanced basic water quality menu may be reduced back to the basic water quality menu provided that the runoff will have no leachable materials used or proposed, will record a covenant that these materials will not be used, and less than 50 percent of the runoff is comprised of commercial land use with certain limits on average daily trips and vehicle repair, maintenance, or sales. The proposed development meets this exception, therefore, the basic water quality menu will be applied in the proposed stormwater quality and detention vault. Special Requirement No. 1 - Other Adopted Area - Specific Requirements No area -specific requirements were identified related with proposed project. Special Requirement No. 2 - Flood plain/Fioodwa Delineation The proposed project is not located within floodplain. Special Requirement No. 3 - Flood Protection Facilities No flood protection facilities are proposed for this project. Special Requirement No. 4 - Source Controls The Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) Design will be shown on the final construction plans and additional information will be provided with the final TIR. Special Requirement No. 5 — Oil Control The site will be used as onsite storage lot for damaged vehicles therefore the site is considered a "high -use" site. The project is proposing to provide a coalescing plate oil/water separator to provide treatment for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) leaving the site. A detail of the unit will be provided with the final TIR. 1.2.8 CORE REQUIREMENT #8: WATER QUALITY lot area, except the assumed impervious portion as specified in Chapter 3 and any portion in which native conditions are preserved by covenant, tract, or easement. 3. Existing impervious surface added since January 8, 2001 that is not fully dispersed and not yet mitigated with a County -approved water quality facility or flow control BMP. Note: January 8, 2001 is the effective date of the ESA 4(d) Rule for Puget Sound Chinook salmon. 4. Replaced PGIS that is not fully dispersed on a transportation redevelopment project in which new impervious surface is 5,000 square feet or more and totals 50% or more of the existing impervious surface within the project limits. 5. Replaced PGIS that is not fully dispersed on a parcel redevelopment project in which the total of new plus replaced impervious surface is 5,000 square feet or more and whose valuation of proposed improvements (including interior improvements and excluding required mitigation improvements) exceeds 50% of the assessed value of the existing site improvements. Exceptions The following exceptions apply only in Basic WQ Treatment Areas: N/A 1. The facility requirement in Basic WQ Treatment Areas as applied to target PGPS may be waived altogether if there is a good faith agreement with the King Conservation District to implement a farm management plan for agricultural uses, or DDES approves a landscape management plan48 that controls solids, pesticides, and fertilizers leaving the site. N/A 2. The Enhanced Basic WQ menu as specified above for certain land uses may be reduced to the Basic WQ menu for treatment of any runoff that is infiltrated according to the standards in Section 5.4. FN_/A_1 3. The Enhanced Basic WQ menu as specified above for certain land uses may be reduced to the Basic WQ menu for treatment of any runoff that is discharged directly, via a non -fish -bearing conveyance system, all the way to the ordinary high water mark of a stream with a mean annual flow of 1,000 cfs or more (at the discharge point of the conveyance system) or a lake that is 300 acres or larger. 4. The Enhanced Basic WQ menu as specified above for treating runoff from a commercial land use may be reduced to the Basic WQ menu if all of the following criteria are met: ✓ a) No leachable metals (e.g., galvanized metals) are currently used or proposed to be used in areas of the site exposed to the weather, AND b) A covenant is recorded that prohibits future such use of leachable metals on the site (use the covenant in Reference Section 8-Q), AND c) Less than 50% of the runoff draining to the proposed treatment facility is from any area of the site comprised of one or both of the following land uses: ■ Commercial land use with an expected ADT of 100 or more vehicles per 1,000 square feet of gross building area. 4 Inbounds Peak 121 Outbounds Peak / Building: 16,973 sf. a Commercial land use involved with vehicle repair, maintenance, or sales. 10.33 aC. of 3.55 a N/A 5. The facility requirement as applied to replaced PGIS maybe waived if the County has adopted a plan and implementation schedule for fulfilling this requirement using regional facilities. iC-?a(roo)= l, 69 _� 48 Landscape management plan means a K ng County approved plan for def n ng the layout and long term ma ntenance of landscap ng features to m n m ze the use of pest c des and fert I zers, and to reduce the d scharge of suspended sol ds and other pollutants. Gu del nes for prepar ng landscape management plans can be found n Reference Sect on 4 A. Subm ttal requ rements are deta led n Sect on 2.3.1.5. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1-69 1/9/2009 AuF Section 3.0 Off -site Analysis The Level One Offsite Analysis was completed on May 10, 2005, by William E. Stevens from Triad Associates. We believe that the upstream and downstream corridors have not changed significantly since this date and the associated field visit is still appropriate for the purpose of the Level 1 downstream analysis. Furthermore, no additional drainage complaints were recorded. A copy of this report can provided for reference upon request. Section 4.0 Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Desicln PART A - EXISTING SITE HYDROLOGY Currently, the project site is undeveloped, covered with moderate brush and ground cover relatively flat with slopes from east to west towards regional wetland. See Figure 3 - Predeveloped Basin Map for details. According to the Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Geotechnical Engineering Report dated May 16, 2013 by Associated Earth Sciences Inc., the site is covered with sand and gravel recessional outwash (Qvr) over till deposits (Qvt). See Figure 4 Soils for further detail. Table 4.1 - Existing Land Use Total Existing Site Basin - modeled as forested, Type C 3.22 Existing Upstream Basin 1.00 Overall Basin (acres) 4.22 PART B - DEVELOPED SITE HYDROLOGY Runoff from the developed site and upstream areas is proposed to discharge west into the South 3361h Street Regional Detention Facility matching existing conditions. PART C - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The stormwater design standards for the proposed Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office project will comply with the 2009 KCSWDM, as adopted by City of Federal Way on February 16, 2010 using WWHM software. PART D - FLOW CONTROL SYSTEM All onsite runoff will be directly routed to South 3361h Street Regional Storage Facility adjacent to the site. The existing flow control facility has been previously sized to accommodate developed flow from the Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office with volume of approximately 36,000 cf. All runoffs from Existing Upstream Basin will bypass the entire site and will be convey through a separate conveyance system routed directly to South 3361h Street Regional Storage Facility west of the project site. PART E - WATER QUALITY SYSTEM The proposed site is divided into three basins. Proposed Basin A includes the building structure, parking area, utilities and landscaping. Also, western portion of the site (0.33 acres) is considered "high use" area where additional oil control facility will be provided before entering the water quality media filtration. From there the runoff will be tie back into South 330h Street Regional Storage Facility. The WWHM water quality on-line facility target flow rate adjusted for 15 mins is 0.3658 cfs (164.2 gpm). Each 18" Kristar cartridge filter provides water quality treatment up to 0.0227 cfs (10.2 gpm). In order to treat the entire Proposed Basin A it will require minimum of seventeen 18" cartridges to meet the treatment goal The oil control facility is also provided for Proposed Basin A to treat the western portion of the parking lots to provide runoff treatment from where damaged vehicles will be stored. The facility will be designed according to 6.6.2 of KCSWDM. Proposed Basin B includes the construction of new proposed roadway (South 340"' Street) utilities and landscaping. Separate water quality media filtration will be provided to treat for Proposed Basin B before tie back into South 336th Street Regional Storage Facility adjacent to the site. The WWHM water quality on-line facility target flow rate adjusted for 15 mins is 0.0756 cfs (33.9 gpm). Each 18" Kristar cartridge filter provides water quality treatment up to 0.0227 cfs (10.2 gpm). In order to treat the entire Proposed Basin B it will require minimum of four 18" cartridges to meet the treatment goal. The existing upstream basin (including South 340th Street and Pacific Highway frontage) will match the existing conditions therefore, project will provided with separate conveyance system which will bypass the entire onsite of the project and route directly into South 3361h Street Regional Storage Facility. See Table 4.2 WWHM Inputs for the breakdown of runoff generating basins and 15 mins water quality flow rate using WWHM. Table 4.2 — WWHM Inputs Pervious (acres) Impervious (acres) ` Total (acres) WQ (cfs) WQ (gpm) Proposed Basin A 0.34 2.32 2.66 0.3658 164.2 Oil Control Treatment Basin 0 j 0.33 0.08 0.48 0.33 0.0302 23.6 Proposed Basin B 0.56 10.0756 33.9 Existing Upstream Basin (BYPASS) 0 0 1.00 1 N/A N/A The WWHM outputs can be found in Appendix A of this report. The project proposes water quality facility will be provided by a Kristar FloGard Perk Filter with multiple 18" cartridges. The Kristar Perk Filter was granted General Use Level Designation (GULD) by the Washington State of Department of Ecology (DOE) after rigorous laboratory and field testing. Based on the DOE GULD approval, the filter will be sized using WWHM Hydrologic model for on-line facility. A copy of DOE GULD approval is found in Appendix A of this report. Section 5.0 Conveyance System Analysis and Design The proposed stormwater conveyance system will consist of stormwater generated from the proposed site sheet flow along road and collected via nearby catch basins and flow through underground pipes. The underground pipe network is designed to flow toward water duality media filtration facility and ultimately flow toward South 336th Regional Detention Facility located adjacent to the site. The stormwater drainage conveyance system will be sized to convey the 25 year design storm event and to contain the 100 year design storm event. A detail Conveyance System analysis and design will be provided with the final TIR. Section 6.0 Special Reports and Studies An original preliminary technical information report was completed for the Progressive Insurance Regional Claims Office, by William E. Stevens from Triad Associates, dated May 5, 2005. A geotechnical investigation report also completed for the project site, by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc., dated May 16, 2013. A copy of these reports can provided for reference upon request. Section 7.0 Other Permits Approval letter for the StormFilter system as standalone treatment facility from Paul Bucich, P.E. with City of Federal Way, dated September 7, 2001. Approval letter to construct underground stormwater facilities from Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plan Reviewer with City of Federal Way, dated May 10, 2005. Any additional other permits will be provided with the final TIR. crrY OF ' - Er.�� DATE: September 7, 2001 TO: Interested Parties and ]folders of the Federal Way/King County Surface Water Design Manual FROM: Paul A. 8ucich, P.E., Surface Water Mans r _Tv�__ RE: pilot Blanket Adjustment for Use of StormFilter Products on Commercial Sites In accordance with Section 1.4.3 Adjustment Application Process of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual adopted by the City of Federal Way as amended, this memorandum identifies that the City of Federal Way is accepting the use of StormFilters on private commercial sites as a stand-alone water quality treatment BMP. This is being done as a pilot program and requires the following be complied with: 1. The applicant must provide the City a signed maintenance agreement with a term no less than three(3) years at the time of final approval. A draft version must be presented at time of application along with the firm identified to conduct the activity. The City reserves the right to reject the maintemricefinrf if it is deemed not qualified for this type of maintenance activity. A sample maintenance agreement can be obtained from the City. 2. Use of the StormFilters will only be permitted on private, commercialsites. Use in residential faciIities, private or public, will not be allowed unless the City directs such action. 3. The applicant must further allow the manufacturer and/or the Cityaccess to the device for water quality testing if deemed necessary by either. Such testing may be used by the Ciry or the manufacturer to substantiate treatmerit'claims and/or further the goals of the manufacturer in obtaining Department of Ecology approval. Test results will not be used to support a case for requiring removal and replacement of the device by the developer or subsequent owner after the evaluation period is completed. If appropriate, test results may be used to encourage expansion or modification in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations for better treatment results. 4. The applicant's engineer, in concertwith the manufacturersrecommendations,shallprovide extra space within the device for expansion of the number of cartridges. This is typically to al low minor expansions and is not intended to provide for large expansive capabilities within the device. The Pilot designation will not require the applicant to conduct testing nor will it require removal at the end of the test period or a set aside area for anew treatment device. Once the Department of Ecology either gives final approval or denial of use, the pilot designation will be removed in one way or another. Current Federal Way Code allows the use of these devices in a treatment train design. This memoraridum does not affect that type of use or approval. 70 '*) .4 19W �91V(IW4601S GT3Z-ZbZ-SZ0 3T :30 G9t071/i61? .0 CITY OF :. Federal May 10, 2005 William E. Stevens, P.E. Triad Associates 12112 115"' Avenue NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6923 CITY HALL 3332-5 Avenue South 9 box 9718 FederaWay l Way, WA 98063-97171 B (253) 835-7000 www. cl fyofederahva y corn Re. Permit i105-100848-000-00-PCI PROGRESSIVE SERVICE CENTER 34001 Pacific Nigh way S Dear Mr. Stevens, This letter is in response to your request to allow the on -site water quality facilities to be constructed below ground for the above -referenced project. Per City of Federal Way requirements, all Flow Control and Water Quality Facilities must be constructed above- ground, if the site is located outside the boundaries of the City Center. This requirement may be modified, provided the applicant makes a written request to the Public Works Department. It must also be shown that aboveground facilities are impractical, due to specific site constraints. As noted in your request letter, dated May 3, 2005, the topography of the site dictates the facilities would need to be located near the western portion of the site, adjacent to the wetland buffer, coinciding with the back of the site. You also cite the applicant's need for a particular site layout that allows for ease of access into the centers drive- throughlchmk-i i area, the City Code -based driveway separation requirements, and the City's Traffic division request to locate the entrance in such a way as too lessen the impact for future traffic queuing on S 340'h Street. Therefore, for the above -stated reason's, the requirement to construct the water quality facilities above -ground for this project are hereby modified to allow the use of underground facilities_ This modifieation is approved for this proposal only. As this project has not yet been approved through the City's Land Use Process, any future proposals on this site that significantly differ from this project would be required to provide above -ground facilities, until such time another waiver is requested and approved. If you have any questions, please call me at (253) 835-2734. Sincerely, P _ Kevin Peterson Engineering Plans Reviewer KPAI enclosure cc; Todd Hamula, Zaremba Group, LLC, 14600 Detroit Ave Suite 1500, Cleveland, OH 44107 Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner Project File/KP Day File I: Z&& J.NSow•la3n:x 120P) Jrn Section 8.0 CSWPPP Anal sis and Design The Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (CSWPPP) will be provided with the final TIR. Section 9.0 Bond Quantities Facility Summaries and Declaration of Covenant The Bond Quantities, Declaration of Covenant will be provided with the final TIR. Section 10.0 Operations and Maintenance Manual The Operations and Maintenance Manual will be provided with the final TIR. Appendix A WWHM Output Predeveloped Basin ■ Fk Edit View HdP ❑lap � --- - Fc�enr�. Iatda.e�vptd PnendepaA �$C:EN1W165 1 Subbasin Name 'veered —� See Inlalbw fi�wdwd. Flaws To: .. .. ---- ._J F.-----_-_.-� Area in Basin 9 Sh'erd Pw Scwwe Available Pviaue Available lm o.v+ur.�'�� F1FLLi✓11iTS �' � V—Efi e. .4 , Peni—Trial ® Aa Impmviu Told l0 - . Aq— BmnTdal W2-2 Aaas Del[, 'Z o I SnSarl Rvr — 66 1 Proposed Basin A M rfwigmr -j raw�+.a teat � �. .• ... � ® Nnn in ensfo hrylgaN W�vio.. : 7Mnal�iwi�/ NrNe6rY wlpr . . _] _ a,...ninal— Ga its"gyp• f 1 i .I Water Quality Flow Rates Analysis 24 has Vukane r0,2&If lane lead I j jleri tl•Fluwl3�e I�sl �� SW KI414 O-Fide (da)�T1' JJ 15MrOmFkrwRda 15MnAeFiowrde Ouatian AowFlemxncp Waterquoily H009mft NZWWFkmwBd n Amyx datasels -501 POET Predwya flew pdC7 f POC2 1 POI 3 POC4 AI Oatmet> Flow S'We Precp Evap I Fk d Frey Mdhod r Log Pmxr n Type III 178 WCbld f ' Cur`iarb Proposed Basin B {�NNrtll �r -�• Area.H.— !. 1Wn 14n�wi AIwpnrw�a - —� — H.....Inv �__^yr M�w.rdd �—•'1 Jaw Ya�7JI � _ jd I ffNerl ly , .. _— Water Quality Flow Rates mv enaly r _ — - -- Water Quails61 Run pmLireBMP 13FF-Eitte:>�P Malysi5 i 21 hnu Vokatle ��� faun eat j SlwxWd Flow Hare Ids) �Q_�Standmd FIowftaty lctsl }SNfiwfeHuwF3dr 'Dp756 115MnyrFlowfate U � I i f Daabons Flow Ftettue 0 Water Qualm Hs+��anh Welland Flece+atipr Analyze dalasets POC 1 POCZ POC3 POC4 plbatasc, IFI- j Stage I Precip I Evap I FloodFFtmeFcyMethod r. Log P" m, Type III 17B r we+f�,d ! Clnnarre Oil Control FacilitV ate: f* vd _ a..._.,... .„..,, 11..E rw—T.: plea M essm ? w.agsrsi I�nS:t.�r 1 ® Avr/.hb 151mYY1 i,IvyhM 77 • � IIY 10tiIIlJ �' �r- Water C Flow Rates Wesel uuauw Run ?qn-Lm°.•9YP - _] OfFlincHliR Analysis 74 hm Vokane f ava lei } 5landald FbDW Rare Idyl 5larddd Fi. Ralc Wi1jRiH,�9c ^^� 15M Flo flare p`W [I15Mnuk9m101c Orratiorss F1owFreyuencY Waterl7urlgr }IYdragaPll WWandFAcA�an I_ AO£ 3 P1]£ 2 P77£ PR£a AlOast tap7— FreRoad Frm,.,cy 141bW {.' 1.oyPcssa ymOIA 77S r►ew r Gxrlxre r.' MA SHIN I I I I SIAII HIIIHIME HI OI ECOLOGY January 2013 GENERAL USE LEVEL DESIGNATION FOR BASIC AND PHOSPHORUS TREATMENT For Kristar Enterprises, Inc. F1oGard Perk FilterTM (using ZPC Filter Media) Ecology's Decision: Based on Kristar's application submissions, including the Draft Technical Evaluation Report, dated April 2010, Ecology hereby issues the following use level designations: General use level designation (GULD) for the Perk FilterTM for basic treatment: • Using a zeolite-perlite-carbon (ZPC) filter media as specified by Kristar. • Sized at hydraulic loading rate of no more than 1.5 gpm/ft2 of media surface area, per Table 1. Table 1. Design Flowrate per Cartridge Effective Cartridge Height (inches) 12 18 Cartridge Flowrate (gpm/cartridge) 6.8 10.2 2. General use level designation (GULD) for the Perk FilterTM for phosphorus treatment: ■ Using a zeolite-perlite-carbon (ZPC) filter media as specified by Kristar. • Sized at hydraulic loading rate of no more than 1.5 gpm/ft2 of media surface area, per Table 1. 3. Ecology approves Perk FilterTM units for treatment at the hydraulic loading rates shown in Table 1, and sized based on the water quality design flow rate. Calculate the water quality design flow rate using the following procedures: • Western Washington: For treatment installed upstream of detention or retention, the water quality design flow rate is the peak 15-minute flow rate as calculated using the latest version of the Western Washington Hydrology Model or other Ecology - approved continuous runoff model. • Eastern Washington: For treatment installed upstream of detention or retention, the water quality design flow rate is the peak 15-minute flow rate as calculated using one of the three methods described in Chapter 2.2.5 of the Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington (SWMMEW) or local manual. • Entire State: For treatment installed downstream of detention, the water quality design flow rate is the full 2-year release rate of the detention facility. 4. These General Use Level Designations have no expiration date but may be revoked or amended by Ecology, and are subject to the conditions specified below. Ecology's Cunditions ol' Usc: Perk FilterTM units shall comply with the following conditions: 1. Design, assemble, install, operate, and maintain Perk FilterTM units in accordance with Kristar's applicable manuals and documents and the Ecology Decision. 2. Each site plan must undergo KriStar review and approval before site installation. This ensures that site grading and slope are appropriate for use of a Perk FilterTM unit. 3. Perk FilterTmmedia shall conform to the specifications submitted to, and approved by, Ecology. 4. Maintenance: The required maintenance interval for stormwater treatment devices is often dependent upon the degree of pollutant loading from a particular drainage basin. Therefore, Ecology does not endorse or recommend a "one size fits all" maintenance cycle for a particular model/size of manufactured filter treatment device. • Typically, Kristar designs PerkFilter systems for a target filter media replacement interval of 12 months. Maintenance includes removing accumulated sediment from the vault, and replacing spent cartridges with recharged cartridges. • Indications of the need for maintenance include effluent flow decreasing to below the design flow rate, as indicated by the scumline above the shoulder of the cartridge. • Owners/operators must inspect PerkFilter for a minimum of twelve months from the start of post -construction operation to determine site -specific maintenance schedules and requirements. You must conduct inspections monthly during the wet season, and every other month during the dry season. (According to the SWMMWW, the wet season in western Washington is October 1 to April 30. According to SWMMEW, the wet season in eastern Washington is October 1 to June 30). After the first year of operation, owners/operators must conduct inspections based on the findings during the first year of inspections. ■ Conduct inspections by qualified personnel, follow manufacturer's guidelines, and use methods capable of determining either a decrease in treated effluent flowrate and/or a decrease in pollutant removal ability. • When inspections are performed, the following findings typically serve as maintenance triggers: • Accumulated vault sediment depths exceed an average of 2 inches, or • Accumulated sediment depths on the tops of the cartridges exceed an average of 0.5 inches, or • Standing water remains in the vault between rain events, or • Bypass occurs during storms smaller than the design storm. • Note: If excessive floatables (trash and debris) are present, perform a minor maintenance consisting of gross solids removal, not cartridge replacement. 5. Discharges from the Perk FilterTM units shall not cause or contribute to water quality standards violations in receiving waters. Applicant: KriStar Enterprises, Inc. Applicant's Address: 360 Sutton Place Santa Rosa, California 95407-8121 Application Documents: • Perk FilterTm Final Report, prepared by: Office of Water Programs, California State University, Sacramento (September 2007) ■ Verification Phase of Perk FilterTm Tests with Zeolite-Perlite-Carbon Media and Zeolite- Carbon Media (August 2007) • Quality Assurance Project Plan KriStar Perk FilterTM Stormwater Treatment Performance Monitoring Project, October 2008 Draft • Technical Evaluation Report Volume 1: KriStar Perk FilterTM Stormwater Treatment System Performance Monitoring, April 2010 • Technical Evaluation Report Volume 2 - Appendices: KriStar Perk FilterTM Stormwater Treatment System Performance Monitoring, April 2010. Applicant's Use Level Request: • General use level designation as a basic and Phosphorus treatment device in accordance with Ecology's Guidance for Evaluating Emerging Stormwater Treatment Technologies Technology Assessment Protocol — Ecology (TAPE) January 2011 Revision. Applicant's Performance Claims: Capability to remove 80% of total suspended solids from stormwater runoff from sites with influent concentrations between 100 mg/L and 200 mg/L and provide effluent concentrations of 20 mg/L or less with influent concentrations less than 100 mg/L given a typical particle size distribution. Capability to remove 50% of Total Phosphorus from stoimwater runoff from sites with influent concentrations between 0.1 mg/l and 0.5 mg/l. Findings of Fact: • Based on laboratory testing at a flowrate of 12 GPM per filter, the Perk FilterTM containing ZPC media had an average total suspended solids removal efficiency of 82% using Sil-Co-Sil 106 with an average influent concentration of 102 mg/L and zero initial sediment loading. Based on field-testing at a flowrate of 0.57 GPM/inch of cartridge height (17.25 inch diameter cartridge) (1.5 gpm per sq ft filter surface area), the Perk FilterTM containing ZPC media had an average total suspended solids removal efficiency of 82.4% for an influent concentration between 20 mg/L and 200 mg/l. The Perk FilterTM containing ZPC media had an average removal efficiency of 85.2% for an influent concentration between 100 mg/1 and 200 mg/l. Removal rates fell over time and dropped below 80% after approximately 10 months. • Based on field testing at a flowrate of 0.57 GPM/inch of cartridge height (17.25 inch diameter cartridge) (1.5 gpm per sq ft filter surface area), the Perk FilterTM containing ZPC media had an average total Phosphorus removal efficiency of 62.4% for an influent concentration between 0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/l. Removal rates tended to remain relatively constant during the 10 months of monitoring. • Field Testing indicates that sediment accumulation in the Sediment Gallery during the 10 months of sampling was within the available volume for sediment. Thus, maintenance at a 6-month frequency (vacuuming of sediment from Inlet Gallery) as suggested by the manufacturer is sufficient. • Filter flows during bypass events utilize the full 30-inch height of the filter. Without bypass, an unknown amount of filter is used. Comparing the flow through the filter during bypass events with the design flow rate shows that the KriStar system falls below the design flow rate after approximately 10 months of operation. • Percent removal of TSS falls below 80% after approximately 10 months. There are earlier data points below 80% but these are from low influent concentration storms Other Perk Filtefrm Related Issues to be Addressed By the Company: 1. Kristar may perform additional monitoring to better determine the maintenance frequency for the filters with respect to design flow rate and Total Suspended Solids removal. Presentation of additional data may result in a modification to the requirements in this Use Level designation document. Technology Description: Contact Information: Download at www.kristar.com Applicant: Mike Kimberlain Kristar Enterprises, Inc. 360 Sutton Place Santa Rosa, CA, 95407 (706) 743-6328 mkimberlain(a7kristar.com Applicant website: www.kristar.com Ecology web link: http://www ecy.wa. oov/prograinsh.�,g/storniwaterinewtech/index.htmt Ecology: Douglas C. Howie, P.E. Department of Ecology Water Quality Program (360) 407-6444 dou las.howie ec .wa. ov Rpvicion HigtAry Date Revision March 2008 Original Draft use -level -designation document June 2010 Revise Use Level to General January 2013 Modified Design Storm Description, added Revision Table, formatted document to match Ecology standard 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 DIVISION 8 MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION 8-09 Raised Pavement Markers 8-09.3 Construction Requirements Section 8-09.3 is supplemented with the following: (December 12, 2012 ******) RPMs shall be installed per City of Federal Way Standard Details. RPMs shall not be ceramic. SECTION 8-20, ILLUMINATION, TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS, ELECTRICAL 8-20.1 Description Section 8-20.1 is replaced with the following: (December 12, 2012 ******) Work includes furnishing and installing all materials necessary to provide: 1. A fully functional traffic signal system at the intersection of SR 99 (Pacific Highway South) and South 340th Street / 16th Avenue South including modification of the existing signal system. 2. Modification to the existing street light system at the intersection, modification of the circuit layout, and installation of new luminaires along S 340th Street. All work shall be performed as shown in the Plans in accordance with applicable Standard Specifications and Standard Plans included herein and the following Special Provisions. Work shall include the supply, testing, and installation of all traffic signal hardware including the communication cable and interface system, and when specified, the modification of such an existing system. The work involves, but shall not be limited to, the following: 1. Signal controllers and equipment 2. Signal cabinets and bases 3. Signal poles 4. Signal and pedestrian heads 5. Emergency Pre-emption equipment 6. Video detection 7. Junction boxes 8. Conduit and wire 9. Luminaires 10. Illumination poles and bases Work shall include the supply, testing and installation of all traffic signal hardware including the communication cable and interface system, and when specified, the modification of such an existing system. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 The work shall also include removing portions of the existing traffic signal system and existing illumination systems. The existing traffic signal system shall be kept in full operation during construction until the new system is in place and ready for turn -on. This work will also include the installation of a complete, functional illumination system. 8-20.1(1) Regulations and Code The first and second sentences of the first paragraph are deleted and replaced with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) All electrical equipment shall conform to the standards of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), FHWA IP-78-16 and the Radio Manufacturers Association. Traffic signal control equipment shall conform to the Contract and these Standard Specifications: EIA Electronics Industries Alliance, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), the International Municipal Signal Association (IMSA), whichever is applicable, and to other codes listed herein. Section 8-20.1(1) is supplemented with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) Where applicable, materials shall conform to the latest requirements of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries and Puget Sound Energy. 8-20.1(2) Industry Codes and Standards (March 13, 2012 ******) The following is added at the end of the first paragraph of this section: National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), Secretary NESC, NESC Committee, IEEE Post Office Box 1331445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331. 8-20.2 Materials Section 8-20.2 is supplemented with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) Control density fill shall meet the requirements of Washington Aggregates and Concrete Association. Crushed surfacing top course and crushed surfacing base course shall meet the requirements of Section 9-03.9(3) of the Standard Specifications. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-2 1 Bedding material shall consist of 5/8-inch minus crushed rock free of any 2 deleterious substances (Section 9-03.1(5)A of the Standard Specifications). 3 4 Requirements for signal equipment and materials are contained in Section 9-29 of 5 the Standard Specifications and Section 9-29 of these Specifications. 6 7 8-20.2(1) Equipment List And Drawings 8 The first paragraph is deleted and replaced with the following: 9 10 (January 26, 2012 ******) 11 Within one (1) week following the pre -construction conference, the Contractor shall 12 submit to the Engineer a completed "Request for Approval of Materials" that 13 describes the material proposed for use to fulfill the Plans and Specifications. 14 Manufacturer's technical information shall be submitted for signal, electrical and 15 luminaire equipment, all wire, conduit, junction boxes, and all other items to be 16 used on the project. Approvals by the Engineer must be received before material 17 will be allowed on the job site. Materials not approved will not be permitted on the 18 job site. 19 20 Section 8-20.2(1) is supplemented with the following: 21 22 (March 13, 1995 WSDOT GSP) 23 Pole base to light source distances (H1) for lighting standards with pre -approved 24 plans shall be as noted in the Plans. 25 26 Pole base to light source distances (1-11) for lighting standards without pre -approved 27 plans will be furnished by the Engineer as part of the final approved shop 28 drawings, prior to fabrication. 29 30 (March 13, 1995 WSDOT GSP) 31 Pole base to light source distances (1-11) for lighting standards with pre -approved 32 plans will be determined or verified by the Engineer at the request of the 33 Contractor prior to fabrication. 34 35 Pole base to light source distances (H1) for lighting standards without pre -approved 36 plans and for combination traffic signal and lighting standards will be furnished by 37 the Engineer as part of the final approved shop drawings prior to fabrication. 38 39 (March 13, 1995 WSDOT GSP) 40 If traffic signal standards, strain pole standards, or combination traffic signal and 41 lighting standards are required, final verified dimensions including pole base to 42 signal mast arm connection point, pole base to light source distances (H1), mast 43 arm length, offset distances to mast arm mounted appurtenances, and orientations 44 of pole mounted appurtenances will be furnished by the Engineer as part of the 45 final approved shop drawings prior to fabrication. 46 FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 3 1 8-20.3 Construction Requirements 2 3 8-20.3(1) General 4 Section 8-20.3(1) is supplemented with the following: 5 6 (January 26, 2012 ******) 7 Signal System Changeover 8 The Contractor shall provide a detailed work plan for the signal system changeover 9 to be approved by the Engineer. They shall not deviate from the work plan without 10 prior written approval from the Engineer. The work plan shall show the exact date 11 of the signal system changeover. 12 13 The changeover of the signal equipment shall commence after 8:30 AM and be 14 completed by 3:00 PM on the same day. During changeover, traffic control shall be 15 provided. The exact work plan and schedule for changeover shall be pre -approved 16 by the Engineer. See Section 1-10 of these Special Provisions. 17 18 Delivery of Removed Items 19 All salvaged signal materials shall become the property of the Contractor, except 20 the existing controller cabinet and all its contents shall remain as property of the 21 City. 22 23 Removed electrical equipment which remains the property of the Contracting 24 Agency shall be delivered to: 25 26 King County Signal Shop 27 Attn: Mark Parrett 28 155 Monroe Avenue NE 29 Renton, Washington 98056 30 Phone:206-396-3763 31 32 Forty eight (48) working hours advance notice shall be communicated to both the 33 Engineer and the Signal Technician at the address listed above. Delivery shall occur 34 during the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Material will 35 not be accepted without the required advance notice. 36 37 Equipment damaged during removal or delivery shall be repaired or replaced to the 38 Engineer's satisfaction at no cost to the Contracting Agency. 39 40 The Contractor shall be responsible for unloading the equipment where directed by 41 the Engineer at the delivery site. 42 43 Contractor Owned Removals 44 All removals associated with an electrical system, which are not designated to 45 remain the property of the Contracting Agency, shall become the property of the 46 Contractor and shall be removed from the project. 47 48 The Contractor shall: FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 1. Remove all wires for discontinued circuits from the conduit system or as directed by the Engineer. 2. Remove elbow sections of abandoned conduit entering junction boxes or as directed by the Engineer. 3. Abandoned conduit encountered during excavation shall be removed to the nearest outlets or as directed by the Engineer. 4. Remove foundations entirely, unless the Plans state otherwise. 5. Backfill voids created by removal of foundations and junction boxes. Backfilling and compaction shall be performed in accordance with Section 2- 19 09.3(1)E. Signal Display Installation Signal displays shall be installed no more than 30 days prior to scheduled signal turn on or changeover. Signal displays and reflectorized backplates when installed prior to signal turn -on or changeover shall be covered and not visible to vehicular traffic at any time. Section 8-20.3(1) is supplemented with the following: (May 15, 2000 WSDOT NWR) Energized Equipment Work shall be coordinated so that electrical equipment, with the exception of the service cabinet, is energized within 72 hours of installation. (June 20, 1995 WSDOT NWR) Pole Removal Poles designated for removal shall not be removed prior to approval of the Engineer. (October 31, 2005 WSDOT NWR) Construction Core Installation The Contractor shall coordinate installation of construction cores with Contracting Agency maintenance staff through the Engineer. The Contractor shall provide written notice to the Engineer, a minimum of seven working days in advance of proposed installation. The Contractor shall advise the Engineer in writing when construction cores are ready to be removed. (May 15, 2000 WSDOT NWR) Electrical Equipment Removals Removals associated with the electrical system shall not be stockpiled within the job site without the Engineer's approval. 8-20.3(2) Excavating and Backfilling Section 8-20.3(2) is supplemented with the following: (January 8, 2013 ******) The Contractor shall supply all trenching necessary for the complete and proper installation of the traffic signal system, interconnect conduit and wiring, and illumination system. Trenching shall conform to the following: 1. In paved areas, edges of the trench shall be sawcut the full depth of the FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 pavement and sawcuts shall be parallel. All trenches for placement of conduit shall be straight and as narrow in width as practical to provide a minimum of pavement disturbance. The existing pavement shall be removed in an approved manner. The trench bottom shall be graded to provide a uniform grade. 2. Trenches located under existing traveled ways shall provide a minimum of 24 inches cover over conduits and shall be backfilled with 21 inches of controlled density fill, vibrated in place, followed by either 3 inches minimum of HMA Cl 1/2" PG 58 -22 , or a surface matching the existing pavement section, whichever is greatest. The asphalt concrete surface cuts shall be given a tack coat of asphalt emulsion (CSS-1) or approved equal immediately before resurfacing, applied to the entire edge and full depth of the pavement cut. Immediately after compacting the new asphalt surface to conform to the adjacent paved surface, all joints between new and original pavement shall be filled with joint sealant meeting the requirements of Section 9-04.2. 3. Trenches for Schedule 40 PVC conduits to be located under existing sidewalks and driveways shall be installed to conform with the City of Federal Way Luminaire Electrical Trench Detail. Such trenches shall be backfilled with bedding material two inches (211) above and below the conduit, with the remaining depth of trench backfilled with native material. If the Engineer determines that the native material is unsuitable, Gravel Borrow shall be used. Sidewalks and driveways shall be removed and replaced as specified. 4. Trenches for Schedule 40 PVC conduits to be located within the right-of-way and outside the traveled way shall have a minimum of twenty-four inches (2411) cover over conduits. Such trenches shall be backfilled with bedding material two inches (211) above and below the conduit, with the remaining depth of trench backfilled with bank run gravel unless the Engineer determines that spoils from the trench excavation are suitable for backfill. 5. When trenches are not to be placed under sidewalks or driveways, the backfill shall match the elevation of the surrounding ground, including a matching depth of top soil, mulch and/or sod if necessary to restore the trench area to its prior condition. 6. Contractor shall use joint trench where possible. Backfill shall be carefully placed so that the backfilling operation will not disturb the conduit in any way. The backfill shall be thoroughly mechanically tamped in eight -inch (811) layers with each layer compacted to ninety-five percent (95%) of maximum density in traveled ways, and ninety percent (90%) of maximum density elsewhere at optimum soil moisture content. Bank run gravel for backfill shall conform to Section 2.01 of the Standard Specifications. Bedding material shall conform to Section 2.01 of the Standard Specifications. All trenches shall be properly signed and/or barricaded to prevent injury to the public. All traffic control devices to be installed or maintained in accordance with Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, latest edition, and as specified elsewhere in these Specifications. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 All conduits installed by boring shall use a surface launched steerable drilling tool. Drilling shall be accomplished using a high-pressure fluid jet toolhead. The drilling fluid shall be used to maintain the stability of the tunnel, reduce drag on the conduit, and provide backfill between the conduit and tunnel. A guidance system which measures the depth, lateral position, and roll shall be used to guide the toolhead when creating the pilot hole. Once the pilot hold is established, a reamer and swivel shall be used to install the conduit. Reaming diameter shall not exceed 1.5 times the diameter of the conduit being installed. Conduit which is being pulled into the tunnel shall be protected and supported so that it moves freely and is not damaged during installation. Excess drilling fluid and spoils shall be disposed of off -site at a legal disposal site obtained and paid for by the Contractor. Drilling fluid returns (caused by fracturing of formation) at locations other than the entry and exit points shall be minimized. Any drilling fluid that surfaces through fracturing shall be cleaned up immediately. Mobile spoils removal equipment capable of quickly removing spoils from entry or exit pits and areas with returns caused by fracturing shall be used as necessary during drilling operations. 8-20.3(4) Foundations Section 8-20.3(4) is supplemented with the following: (December 18, 2009 ******) The foundation for the controller and service cabinets shall conform to the detail on the Plans. Conduits shall be centered horizontally except service conduit, which shall be placed at the side of the power panel. Foundations for the Type I traffic signal poles shall conform to Standard Plan 3- 21.10-01. Foundations for the Type II and Type III traffic signal poles shall conform to details on the Signal Standard Sheet in the Plans. Foundations for the streetlight poles shall conform to City of Federal Way Drawing Number 3-39 except that foundation depth shall be as noted on the Illumination Pole Schedule. Foundations for the decorative streetlight poles shall conform to City of Federal Way Drawing Number 3-43 except that foundation depth shall be as noted on the Illumination Pole Schedule. Pole foundations within the sidewalk area shall be constructed in a single pour to the bottom of the cement concrete sidewalk. The sidewalk shall be constructed in a separate pour. Pole foundations not within the sidewalk area shall incorporate a 3-foot by 3-foot by 4-inch-thick cement concrete pad set flush with the adjacent ground. Where the pad abuts a sidewalk, the pad shall extend to the sidewalk and the top of the pad shall be flush with the sidewalk. A construction joint shall be provided between the two units. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 7 2 3 8-20.3(5) Conduit 4 Section 8-20.3(5) is supplemented with the following: 5 6 (March 16, 2011 ******) 7 All conduits for signal cable, illumination circuits, and interconnect systems under 8 roadways and driveways shall be rigid galvanized steel or Schedule 80 polyvinyl 9 chloride (PVC). Schedule 40 PVC may be used when not under the roadway or 10 driveways. 11 12 All conduits shall have a minimum buried depth of twenty-four inches (2411). PVC 13 conduct ends shall have bell end PVC bushings. 14 15 All conduits for signal cable raceways under roadways or driveways shall be rigid 16 galvanized steel or Schedule 80 polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Rigid steel or Schedule 80 17 PVC conduit shall be used for all road crossings whether they are signal, detector 18 or illumination cable. Schedule 40 PVC conduits may be used for detector lead-ins 19 or illumination. Whenever PVC conduit is used a ground wire shall be provided. 20 21 All conduit trenches shall be straight and as narrow in width as is practical to 22 provide a minimum of pavement disturbance. 23 24 When conduit risers are installed, they shall be attached to the pole every 4 feet 25 and shall be equipped with weather heads. 26 27 Conduit for the service wires between the Puget Sound Energy pole and the service 28 panel and all above ground conduit shall be hot -dip galvanized rigid steel. 29 30 All conduits shall be clearly labeled at each junction box, handhole, vault or other 31 utility appurtenance. Labeling shall be permanent and shall consist of the 32 owner/type name and a unique conduit number or color. The owner name shall be 33 approved by the Engineer prior to starting work. The recommended owner/type 34 abbreviations are: 35 36 PSE — Puget Sound Energy 37 QWEST — Qwest 38 COMCAST(AT&T)/C — Cable 39 COMCAST(AT&T)/F — Fiber 40 SIC — City Signal Interconnect 41 City Spare — City spares 42 Cobra — COBRA luminaire system 43 44 45 Section 8-20.3(5) is supplemented with the following: 46 47 (August 10, 2009 WSDOT NWR) 48 Conduit Seal, Detectable Tape and Location Wire 49 Upon installation of wiring, all conduits entering pad mounted cabinets, all conduit 50 entering ITS hubs, and all ITS conduit 2 inches in diameter or larger shall be sealed 51 with an approved mechanical plug at both ends of the conduit run. Installation of FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-8 1 mechanical plugs shall conform to the manufacturer's recommendations. Upon 2 installation of wiring at other locations, conduit shall be sealed with duct seal. Upon 3 installation of the pull string, spare conduit shall be plugged. 4 5 A pull string rated for 200 lbs. or greater shall be installed in all spare conduits. 6 7 Detectable underground warning tape shall be placed 12-inches above all innerduct 8 installed in trenches. 9 10 Location 14 AWG stranded orange USE insulated wire shall be placed in 11 conjunction with all innerduct installed in trenches. The location wire shall be 12 placed directly above the conduit containing innerduct in single conduit installations 13 or between the conduits containing innerduct in multiple conduit installations. 14 15 Location wire routed into pull boxes or cable vaults shall be attached to the "C" 16 channel or the cover hinge bracket with stainless steel bolts and straps. A 1-foot 17 loop of locate wire shall be provided above the channel as shown in the Plans. 18 19 8-20.3(6) Junction Boxes, Cable Vaults, and Pull Boxes 20 Section 8-20.3(6) is supplemented with the following: 21 22 (March 13, 2012 ******) 23 Unless otherwise noted in the Plans or approved by the Engineer, junction boxes, 24 cable vaults and pull boxes shall not be placed within the traveled way or 25 shoulders. 26 27 All junction boxes, cable vaults, and pull boxes placed within the traveled way or 28 paved shoulders shall be heavy-duty. 29 30 Junction boxes shall not be located within the traveled way, wheelchair ramps, or 31 driveways, or interfere with any other previous or relocated installation. The lid of 32 the junction box shall be flush with the surrounding area and be adequately 33 supported by abutting pavements or soils. 34 35 Junction boxes, cable vaults and pull boxes which are placed within the sidewalk 36 shall have slip resistant lids which meet the requirements of Americans with 37 Disabilities Act (ADA) and Public Right -of -Way Accessibility Guideline (PROWAG). 38 Approved products are: 39 1.) Mebacl (their most aggressive surface) manufactured by IKG Industries 40 2.) SlipNOT Grade 3-coarse manufactured by W.S. Molnar Company. 41 42 Approved slip resistant surfaces shall have coefficient of friction of no less than 0.6 43 and have a proven track record of outdoor application which lasts for at least 10 44 years. 45 46 Wiring shall not be pulled into any conduit until all associated junction boxes have 47 been adjusted to, or installed in, their final grade and location, unless installation is 48 necessary to maintain system operation. If wire is installed for this reason, 49 sufficient slack shall be left to allow for future adjustment. 50 FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-9 1 Adjustments involving raising or lowering the junction boxes shall require conduit 2 modification if the resultant clearance between top of conduit and the junction box 3 lid becomes less than 6 inches or more than 10 inches. Wiring shall be replaced for 4 full length if sufficient slack as specified in Section 8-20.3(8) is not maintained. No 5 splicing will be permitted. 6 7 Junction boxes Type 1 and 2 shall meet the requirements of WSDOT Standard Plan 8 1-40.10-01. Type 8 junction boxes shall meet the requirements of WSDOT Standard 9 Plan 1-40.30-01. Junction boxes shall be inscribed based upon system per WSDOT 10 Standard Plan J-40.30.01. Junction box lids and frames shall be grounded per 11 Section 8-20.3(9). 12 13 Junction boxes shall be located at the station and offset indicated on the Plans 14 except that field adjustments may be made at the time of construction by the 15 Engineer to better fit existing field conditions. 16 17 Junction boxes for copper and/or fiber signal interconnect shall be placed at a 18 maximum interval of 300 feet and shall be inscribed with "TS" as described on 19 WSDOT Standard Plan J-40.30-01. 20 21 Heavy-duty Type 4, 5 and 6 junction boxes, cable vaults and pull boxes shall be 22 installed in accordance with the following: 23 1. Excavation and backfill shall be in accordance with Section 2-09. Excavation 24 for junction boxes, cable vaults and pull boxes shall be sufficient to leave 25 one foot in the clear between their outer surface and the earth bank. 26 2. Junction boxes, cable vaults and pull boxes shall be installed on a level 6- 27 inch layer of crushed surfacing top course, in accordance with 9-03.9(3), 28 placed on a compacted or undisturbed foundation. The crushed surfacing 29 shall be compacted in accordance with Section 2-09.3(1)E. 30 3. After installation, the lid/cover shall be kept bolted down during periods 31 when work is not actively in progress at the junction box, cable vault or pull 32 box. 33 4. Before closing the lid/cover, the lid/cover and the frame/ring shall be 34 thoroughly brushed and cleaned of all debris. There shall be absolutely no 35 visible dirt, sand or other foreign matter between the bearing surfaces. 36 5. When the lid/cover is closed for the final time, a liberal coating of anti37 37 seize compound shall be applied to the bolts and nuts and the lid shall be 38 securely tightened. 39 6. Hinges on the Type 4, 5 and 6 junction boxes shall be located on the side of 40 the box, which is nearest to adjacent shoulder. Hinges shall allow the lid to 41 open 180 degrees. 42 43 Fiber vaults shall be installed in accordance with the following: 44 1. All openings around conduits shall be sealed and filled with grout to prevent 45 water and debris from entering the vaults or pull boxes. The grout shall 46 meet the specifications of the fiber vault manufacturers. 47 2. Backfilling around the work shall not be allowed until the concrete or mortar 48 has set. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 3. Upon acceptance of work, fiber vaults shall be free of debris and ready for cable installation. All grounding requirements shall be met prior to cable installation. 4. Fiber vaults shall be adjusted to final grade using risers or rings manufactured by the fiber vault and pull box manufacturer. Fiber vaults with traffic bearing lids shall be raised to final grade using ring risers to raise the cover only. 5. Fiber vaults shall be installed at the approximate location shown in the Drawings. Final location to be approved by the Engineer. 6. All existing conduits will need to be open and exposed for access within the vault. Care shall be taken to identify which conduits have existing cables. All conduits will extend 2 inches within the vault walls. At the 2-inch mark the excess conduit on the existing structure will need to be removed and all cables exposed. 7. Once the conduits are located, excavate a hole large enough to install the fiber vault. The vault shall have a concrete floor as indicated on the Drawings. The floor shall be installed on 6 inches of crushed surfacing top course. If a fiber vault is installed outside a paved area, an asphalt pad shall be constructed surrounding the junction box. Ensure that the existing conduits are at a minimum of 4 inches above the top of the floor. 8-20.3(8) Wiring Section 8-20.3(8) is modified as follows: (March 6, 2012 ******) The following is inserted between the 3rd and 4th paragraph of this section: Loop wires will be spliced to lead in wires at the junction box with an approved mastik tape, 3-M 06147 or equal, leaving 3 feet of loose wire. Connectors will be copper and sized for the wire. Mastik splice material will be centered on the wire and folded up around both sides and joined at the top. Splice will then be worked from the center outward to the ends. The ends will be visible and fully sealed around the wire. The end of the lead-in cables shall have the sheathing removed 8 inches and shall be dressed external to the splice. (March 6, 2012 ******) The 9th paragraph of this section is deleted and replaced with the following: Fused quick disconnect kits shall be of the SEC type or equivalent. Underground illumination splices shall be epoxy or underground service buss/lighting connector kits. Installation shall conform to details in the Standard Plans. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 11 1 2 3 4 5 7 D.* (March ' 1 � paragraph, 1 1�i of this S�c�om are deleted and replaced with the The *cn panag ,�, items /�� ' / Field Wiring Chart([MSA Standards) 501 flnput 508 AC+DeteCtDra 503 AC- 509 AC+12Vo|ts 503 AC+Lights 510 Remote -Flash SO4 AC+Ughts 511 Remote -All Red 505 AC+L|ghts 512-530 GpeC|d| 506 ACfOmntrO| 551-562 Interconnect 507 AC+[rossvvd|k 593-590 Rail Road Preemption Phases 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A B Vehicle (Call) Preemption Blue (BB) 583 586 _ 589 592 _ ________ Vehicle Red 611 621 631 641 651 661 671 681_ 691 601 Heads Orange '-'-----------'------------------ 612 622 632 643 653 663 672 683 692 _ 602 Green 613623_ 633 663 673 683 693 603. Black 614 634 634 _643__.653 6� --- �54 ..... -___--'----_. 6� b� �4 6� 6� White 816 626 636 646 656 666 676 686 096 606 _ --___---_---_--- -----------------------'---- ' PedeStdan '-(Donn»non) (Hand) 711_ 721 731 741 _75-1 761 771 781 _ 791_ 701 Headsand _Red Green ��4an\ ' ' 712 723 732 742 753 .---___ 762 772 782 792 702 . PPB ---_- White (Common 716 726 736 746 756 766 776 786 796 706 for Lights) Orange 714 724 734 744 754 764 774 784 794 704 (Push button) Black (Common 715 725 735 745 755 764 775 785 795 705 for Push button) Vehicle Loop 811 821 831 841 851 861 871 881 891 801 FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100%sUBMIITa OC`rOBsn9,anzs 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Section 8-20.3(8) is supplemented with the following: (March 6, 2012 ******) All signal cable shall be consistent with Section 9-29.3 of the Standard Specifications. The end of every conductor at each wire termination, splice, connector or device, shall have a PVC wire marking sleeve bearing as its legend the circuit number indicated in the wiring schematic drawing. Where terminal strips are used as a connecting device between conductors, the terminal strips shall also bear the circuit number. Cable entering cabinets shall be neatly bundled and wrapped. Each wire shall bear the circuit number and be thoroughly tested before being connected to the appropriate terminal. Circuit conductors shall be standard copper wire in all conduit runs with size specified on the Plans. Conductors from luminaire bases to the luminaire fixture shall be minimum No. 14 AWG pole and bracket cable. Section 8-20.3(8) is supplemented with the following: (April 14, 2003 WSDOT NWR) Wire Labels At each junction box, all illumination wires, power supply wires, and communication cable shall be labeled with a PVC marking sleeve. For illumination and power supply circuits the sleeve shall bear the circuit number. For communication cable the sleeve shall be marked "Comm.". (March 13, 1995 WSDOT NWR) Wire Splices All splices shall be made in the presence of the Engineer. (May 1, 2006 WSDOT NWR) Illumination Circuit Splices Temporary splices shall be the heat shrink type. 8-20.3(9) Bonding and Grounding Section 8-20.3(9) is supplemented with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) At points where shields of shielded conductors are grounded, the shields shall be neatly wired and terminated on suitable grounding lugs. Junction box lids and frames shall be grounded in accordance with Department of Labor and Industries standards, and shall be grounded so that the ground will not break when the lid is removed and laid on the ground next to the junction box. All conduits which are not galvanized steel shall have bonding wires between junction boxes. Ground rods shall be copper clad steel, 3/4-inch in diameter by 10-feet long, connections shall be made with termite welds. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 At points where wiring shields of shielded conductors are grounded, the shields shall be neatly wired and terminated on suitable grounding lugs. Section 8-20.3(9) is supplemented with the following: (August 21, 2006 WSDOT NWR) )unction Box Grounding Where shown in the Plans or where designated by the Engineer, the metal frame and lid of existing junction boxes shall be grounded to the existing equipment grounding system. The existing equipment grounding system shall be derived from the service serving the raceway system of which the existing junction box is a part. 8-20.3(11) Testing Section 8-20.3(11) is supplemented with the following: (March 6, 2012 ******) The signal including UPS equipment shall be put into operation by King County personnel. The Contractor shall be present during the turn -on with adequate equipment to repair any deficiencies in operation. The Contractor shall notify King County five working days in advance of any signal turn -on. Turn -on shall not be allowed on Fridays, weekends, holidays, or the day preceding a holiday. Before final acceptance, a field test of the installation shall be performed for continuity and ground of each circuit; insulation resistance (megger test between each circuit and ground); and function, to ensure operation as specified or intended. Any faults in the system shall be corrected and re -tested. Costs for performing these tests and correcting the faults shall be paid by the Contractor. 8-20.3(13) Illumination Systems Section 8-20.3(13) is supplemented with the following: -arch 1�,2612 s shown an the Plans, the Contractor shall replace portions of the illt?mination ystems on the (north, south, west, and east) approaches to the intersection. The ontractor shall also reconnect the existing illumination system on. the Pproacn. The existing poles on the approach are owned by the City and Ball be removed by the Contractor as shown on the plans. The existing_poies ❑n he apprcgche-! are-o-wrleci by PSE and will- g removed by them. ^e exist,inq lighting ;,rsteMs shall remain operational until kltie new systems are unctioni�. The Engineer may appMvpa!ff@l 4ntgrrLypgg0s required hecause� t,r i - 8-20.3(13)A Light Standards The 8th paragraph of this section is deleted and replaced with the following: (March 15, 2012 ******) All new and relocated metal light standards shall be numbered per City of Federal Way Development Standard Drawing number 3-39B. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 8-20.3(14) Signal Systems Section 8-20.3(14) is supplemented with the following: (August 10, 2009 WSDOT NWR) Temporary Video Detection System Temporary video detection systems shall be completely installed and made operational prior to any associated induction loop being disabled. 8-20.3(14)B Signal Heads Section 8-20.3(14)B is modified as follows: The first paragraph is deleted and replaced with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) Signal heads shall not be installed at any intersection until all other signal equipment is installed and the controller is in place, inspected, and ready for operation at that intersection, unless ordered by the Engineer. If the Engineer orders advance installation, the signal heads shall be covered to clearly indicate the signal is not in operation. The signal head covering material shall be of sufficient size to entirely cover the display. The covering shall extend over all edges of the signal housing and shall be securely fastened at the back. Signal heads shall be installed with back plates. A two (2) inch wide strip of Type IX yellow retro reflective sheeting shall be applied to the outside border of the back plates in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. The application surface of the back plate shall be cleaned, degreased Section 8-20.3(14)B is supplemented with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) Alignment of vehicular and pedestrian signal heads shall be approved by the Engineer prior to system turn -on. All new vehicular and pedestrian signal heads shall be covered (sacked) completely with a 6 mil black polyethylene sheeting until placed into initial operation. The fitted covers shall use adjustable straps. The fitted covers shall have a one -inch hole for each signal display to flash out indications. The type of mounting hardware specified for the mast arm mounted vehicle signals may require modification at the time of installation to accommodate as built conditions. After the pole assembly has been installed and leveled, the Contractor shall measure the distance between each mounting point on the arm and the roadway. A type of mounting bracket different from that specified on the Plans shall be provided and installed by the Contractor if necessary to achieve the following criteria: 1. Red indications shall be in as straight a line as possible. 2. The bottom of the housing shall be between 16.5 feet and 19.0 feet above the pavement. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 8-20.3(14)E Signal Standards Section 8-20.3(14)E is supplemented with the following: (December 18, 2009 ******) Traffic signal standards shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the methods and materials noted in the applicable Standard Plans, pre -approved plans, or special design plans. After delivering the poles or arms to the job site and before they are installed, they shall be stored in a place that will not inconvenience the public. All poles and arms shall be installed in compliance with Washington State Utility and Electrical Codes. Terminal cabinet(s) shall be installed on all Type II and Type III signal poles or where designated on the wiring diagrams in the Plans in accordance with the material requirements of Section 9-29.25 of the Standard Specifications. Terminal cabinets shall be installed at a height not to impede pedestrians. (December 18, 2009 ******) 8-20.3(14)F Opticom Detectors New Section Opticom detectors shall be installed in a drilled and tapped hole in the top of the mast arm unless otherwise shown in the Plans. They shall be tightly fitted to point in the direction shown in the plan view. Lead-in cable back to the controller, shall be 3M detector 138 cable, or equivalent, and shall have no splices. All lead-in cables shall be connected to terminals in the controller cabinet as shown in the wiring diagram. The shields shall be grounded to the grounding bar. (December 18, 2009 ******) 8-20.3(14)G Video Camera Detectors New Section The video camera shall be installed consistent with the manufacturer recommendations. Controller cabinet equipment shall be installed in the cabinet when cabinet testing is performed. 8-20.3(17) "As Built" Plans Section 8-21.3(17) is deleted and replaced with the following: (December 18, 2009 ******) Upon completion of the project, the Contractor shall furnish an "as -built" drawing of the intersection showing all signal heads, pole locations, detectors, junction boxes, Illumination system showing luminaire locations, miscellaneous equipment, conductors, cable wires up to the signal controller cabinet, and with a special symbol identifying those items that have been changed from the original contract drawings. All items shall be located to within one foot (11) horizontally and six inches (611) vertically above or below the finished surface grade. (March 6, 2012 ******) 8-20.3(18) Removal of Existing Signal Equipment New Section Where noted on the Plans, existing signal, illumination, and interconnect equipment shall be removed by the Contractor. All salvaged signal, illumination, and interconnect equipment materials shall be the property of the Contractor, except that the existing controller and UPS cabinets at the intersection of SR 99 (Pacific Highway S) and S FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 340th St / 16th Ave S and all contents shall be delivered to the King County Signal Shop at 155 Monroe Avenue NE, Renton, Washington 98056. All other material removed shall become the property of the Contractor and shall be disposed of off -site at a legal disposal site. All pole foundations and anchor bolts shall be removed to 18 inches below new subgrade, and the resulting hole shall be backfilled with compacted gravel borrow meeting the requirements of Section 9-03.14(1), unless the Engineer has approved the use of native material. Where junction boxes are removed, the conduit and wire shall also be removed to the bottom of the trench and the resulting hole backfilled with gravel borrow meeting the requirements of Section 9-03.14(1), unless the Engineer has approved the use of native material. Removals associated with the electrical system shall not be stockpiled within the jobsite without the Engineer's approval. SECTION 8-21, PERMANENT SIGNING 8-21.1 Description Section 8-21.1 is deleted and replaced with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) This work shall consist of furnishing and installing permanent signing, sign removal, sign relocation, and the project sign installation and removal, in accordance with the Plans, these Specifications, the Standard Plans, MUTCD, and the City of Federal Way Standard Details at the locations shown in the Plans or where designated by the Engineer. Signs to be removed as shown on the Plans, shall be returned to the Owner. 8-21.2 Materials Section 8-21.1 is modified as follows: Sentence three is deleted and replaced with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) Materials for sign mounting shall conform to Section 9-28.11. 8-21.3 Construction Requirements 8-21.3(2) Placement of Signs Section 8-21.3(2) is supplemented with the following: (December 18, 2009 ******) The City of Federal Way, 253-835-2744, shall be contacted within 2 working days of completion of the permanent signing installation to inspect, inventory, and log all new and relocated signs. Other Signs: Refer to the currently adopted version of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) with Washington State Supplements. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 17 1 8-21.3(5) Sign Relocation 2 Section 8-21.3(5) is supplemented with the following: 3 4 (December 18, 2009 5 King County METRO and/or Pierce Transit personnel will remove and reinstall all 6 existing bus stop signs and supports within the project limits. The Contractor shall 7 contact King County METRO at 206-684-2732 or Pierce Transit at 253-581-8130 to 8 coordinate sign work 2 weeks prior to the required sign removal or installation. A 9 copy of the record of communication shall be forwarded to the City of Federal Way. 10 11 SECTION 8-22, PAVEMENT MARKING 12 13 8-22.1 Description 14 Section 8-22.1 is supplemented with the following: 15 16 (December 18, 2009 ******) 17 Pavement markings shall conform to City of Federal Way Standard Details. Profiled 18 and plastic lines shall conform to the pattern as shown on WSDOT Standard Plan 19 M-20.20-01. 20 21 8-22.3 Construction Requirements 22 23 8-22.3(3)E Installation 24 Section 8-22.3(3)E is supplemented with the following: 25 26 (March 13, 2012 ******) 27 Methyl Methacrylate Pavement Markings 28 The material must be applied using a two-part process in a single pass. The first 29 process consists of spraying of catalyzed material to form a solid continuous 30 baseline. The second process consists of extruding a curtain of catalyzed material 31 onto a rotating spindle to create the structure or agglomerates. The structure is 32 applied on top of the baseline prior to the application of reflective media. 33 34 Profiled methyl methacrylate lines shall be installed per WSDOT Standard Plan 35 M20.20-01. 36 37 8-22.3(3)G Glass Beads 38 Section 8-22.3(3)G is supplemented with the following: 39 40 (March 13, 2012 ******) 41 Methyl Methacrylate Pavement Markings 42 Glass beads shall be applied at a rate of eight (8) to ten (10) pounds per one 43 hundred square feet. 44 45 Bonded core elements shall be applied at a rate of ten (10) grams per four (4) 46 inch wide by one (1) linear foot of marking. 47 48 8-22.3(6) Removal of Pavement Markings 49 Section 8-22.3(6) is supplemented with the following: 50 51 (December 13, 2012 ******) FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 18 1 As indicated on the plans, the Contractor shall remove existing pavement markings 2 consisting of paint, plastic and raised pavement markings. 3 4 5 END OF DIVISION 8 6 FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 19 1 DIVISION 9 2 MATERIALS 3 4 SECTION 9-18, PRECAST TRAFFIC CURB AND BLOCK TRAFFIC CURB 5 6 SECTION 9-21, RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS (RPM) 7 8 9-21.2(1) Physical Properties 9 Section 9-21.2(1) is supplemented with the following: 10 11 (March 13, 2012 ******) 12 Type 2 raised pavement markers shall NOT be ceramic. 13 14 SECTION 9-28, SIGNING MATERIALS AND FABRICATION 15 16 9-28.1 General 17 Section 9-21.2(1) is modified as follows: 18 19 Paragraph three is deleted and replaced with the following: 20 21 (January 8, 2013 ******) 22 All regulatory (R series), school (S series), and warning (W and X series) signs, 23 except for parking regulation, parking prohibition signing and signs of fluorescent 24 yellow color shall be constructed with Type III Glass Bead Retroreflective Element 25 Material sheeting in accordance with Section 9-28.12 of the Standard 26 Specifications. This sheeting has a retro reflection rating of 250 candelas/foot 27 candle/square foot for white -silver sheeting with a divergence angle of 0.2 degrees 28 and an incidence angle of minus 4 degrees. This high intensity sheeting shall be 29 Type III sheeting or greater. All street name (D-3) sign sheeting shall meet this 30 specification. The reflectivity standard of supplemental plaques shall match that of 31 the primary sign. 32 33 All overhead signing, all regulatory (R series) of fluorescent yellow color and all 34 school (S series) of florescent yellow color shall meet the specifications of Type IX 35 Micro Prismatic Retroreflective Element Material sheeting in accordance with 36 Section 9-28.12 of the Standard Specifications. This standard applies to all signs 37 mounted above the roadway, on span wire or signal mast arms and all regulatory 38 (R series) and school (S series) signs of fluorescent yellow color. The reflectivity 39 standard of supplemental plaques shall match that of the primary sign. 40 41 Motorist information and parking signing shall be constructed with Type I Glass Bead 42 Retroreflective Element Material sheeting in accordance with Section 9-28.12 of the 43 Standard Specifications. The reflectivity standard of supplemental plaques shall match 44 that of the primary sign. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 1000/a SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 9-28.8 Sheet Aluminum Signs Section 9-28.8 table is deleted and replaced with the following: (January 8, 2013 ******) Less than 30 inches Greater than 30 inches, less than 48 inches Greater than 48 inches Section 9-28.8 is supplemented with the following: 0.080 inches 0.100 inches 0.125 inches (January 8, 2013 ******) All permanent signs shall be constructed from aluminum sign blanks unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. Sign -blank minimum thicknesses, based on maximum dimensions, shall be as follows: All D-3 street -name signs shall be constructed with 0.100-inch-thick blanks. The Contractor shall install permanent signs which meet or exceed the minimum reflectivity standards. All sign face sheeting shall be applied to sign blanks with pressure sensitive adhesives. 9-28.9 Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic Signs Section 9-28.9 is deleted in its entirety. (December 18, 2009 ******) 9-28.14 Sign Support Structures Section 9-28.14 is supplemented with the following: (December 18, 2009 ******) Unless otherwise noted on the plans or approved by the engineer, all sign posts shall be timber sign posts. 9-28.14(1) Timber Sign Posts Section 9-28.14(1) is supplemented with the following: (December 18, 2009 ******) All ground -mounted sign posts shall use pressure treated hem -fir wood posts unless approved otherwise by the Engineer. All wood posts shall be buried a minimum of 30 inches below the finished ground line. Post backfill shall be compacted at several levels to minimize settling. All posts shall be two-way plumb. 9-28.14(2) Steel Structures and Posts Section 9-28.14(2) is supplemented with the following: (December 18, 2009 ******) FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 21 1 2 3 4 5 fi 7 8 9 1Q 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Unless otherwise noted on the plans or approved by the engineer, all sign posts shall be timber sign posts. Approved Manufacturers for Steel Sign Supports The Standard Plans lists several steel sign support types. These supports are patented devices and many are sole -source. All of the sign support types listed below are acceptable when shown in the plans. Steel Sin Support lype Type TP-A & TP-B Type PL, PL-T & PL-U Type AS Type AP Type ST 1, ST 2, ST 3, & ST 4 Type SB-1, SB-2, & SB-3 [Manufacturer Transpo Industries, Inc. Northwest Pipe Co. Transpo Industries, Inc. Transpo Industries, Inc. Ultimate Highway Products, Allied Tube & Conduit, Inc., Northwest Pipe, Inc. Ultimate Highway Products, Xcessories Squared Development and Manufacturing Incorporated„ Northwest Pipe, Inc. SECTION 9-29, ILLUMINATION, SIGNAL, ELECTRICAL 9-29.2 Junction Boxes, Cable Vaults and Pull Boxes 9-29.2(1) Standard Duty Junction Boxes Section 9-29.2(1) is supplemented with the following: (January 21, 2011 WSDOT NWR) Concrete )unction Boxes The Non -slip lid and frame shall be made of the following material: Non -slip lid ASTM A36 flat steel Non -slip frame ASTM A36 flat steel Both the non -slip lid and non -slip frame shall be treated with Mebacl (their most aggressive surface) as manufactured by IKG industries, or SlipNOT Grade 3-coarse as manufactured by W.S. Molnar Co. The non -slip lid shall be identified with permanent marking on the underside indicating the type of surface treatment ("M1" for Mebac 1; or "S3" for SlipNot3) and the year of manufacturer. The permanent marking shall be 1/8 inch line thickness formed by engraving, stamping or with a stainless steel weld bead. 9-29.3(2)H Three -Conductor Shielded Cable Section 9-29.3(2)H is supplemented with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMIITAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Lead-in cable back to the controller for Opticom units shall be 3-M detector 138 cable or equivalent. 9-29.6 Light and Signal Standards Section 9-29.6 is supplemented with the following: (December 18, 2009 ******) Light standards shall be tapered round aluminum tube C-wall alloy 6063 satin brushed finish with Davit bracket arm, as shown in Federal Way Standard Detail herein, except that luminaire mounting height shall be as shown on the Illumination Pole Schedule. Section 9-29.6 is supplemented with the following: (August 6, 2012 WSDOT GSP) Traffic Signal Standards Traffic signal standards shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the methods and materials noted in the applicable Standard Plans, pre -approved plans, or special design plans. All welds shall comply with the latest AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals. Welding inspection shall comply with Section 6-03.3(25)A Welding Inspection. Hardened washers shall be used with all signal arm connecting bolts instead of lockwashers. All signal arm AASHTO M 164 connecting bolts tightening shall comply with Section 6-03.3(33). Traffic signal standard types and applicable characteristics are as follows: Type PPB Pedestrian push button posts shall conform to Standard Plan 3-20.10 or to one of the following pre -approved plans: Fabricator Northwest Signal Supply Inc. Valmont Ind. Inc. Ameron Pole Prod. Div. Union Metal Corp. West Coast Engineering Group KW Industries Drawing No. NWS 3540 Rev. 2 and NWS 3540B Rev. 2 DB00655 Rev. J Sheet's 1, 2 & 3 WA10TR-1 & WAPPBPBA TA-10035 Rev. R6 Sht. 1 WSDOT PP-01 Rev. 1 10-200-PED-1 Rev. 7, Sheets 1, 2 and 3 Type PS Pedestrian signal standards shall conform to Standard Plan 3-20.16 or to one of the following pre -approved plans: Fabricator Northwest Signal Supply Inc. 2Valmont Ind. Inc. Ameron Pole Prod. Div. Union Metal Corp. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS Drawing No. NWS 3540 Rev. 2 and NWS 3540B Rev. DB00655 Rev.J Sht. 1, 2 & 3 WA10TR-1 & WA10TR-2 TA-10025 Rev. R17 Sht. 1 & 2 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 West Coast Engineering Group WSDOT PP-02 Rev. 1 American Pole Structures, Inc. WS-PP-03 Rev. 1D KW Industries 10-200-PED-1 Rev. 7, Sheets 1, 2 and 3 Type II Characteristics: Luminaire mounting height N.A. Luminaire arms N.A. Luminaire arm length N.A. Signal arms One Only Type II standards shall conform to one of the following pre -approved plans, provided all other requirements noted herein have been satisfied. Maximum (x) (y) (z) signal arm loadings in cubic feet are noted after fabricator. Signal Arm Length (max) Fabricator-(x) (y) (z) Drawing No. 65 ft. Valmont Ind. Inc. (2894) D1300625-Rev.R, Shts. 1, 2,3 & 4 65 ft. Union Metal Corp. (2900) 71026-1386 Rev. R9 Shts. 1, 2, & 3 65 ft. Ameron Pole Prod. Div. (2900) W3724-1 Rev. J & W3724-2 Rev.G 65 ft. Northwest Signal Supply Inc. (2802) NWS 3500 Rev. 4 or NWS 3500B Rev. 4 45 ft. American Pole Structures, Inc. (1875) WS T2-L Rev. 8 Sheet 1 & 2 of 2 65 ft. American Pole Structures, Inc. (2913) WS T2-H Rev. 8 Sheets 1 & 2 of 2 65 ft. KW Industries 10-200 TSP-4 Rev. 5, Sheets 1, 2, and 3 65 ft West Coast Engineering Group WSDOT-TS-01 Rev. 3 Sheets 1, 2, and 3 65 ft. Maico Industries (2894) WSDOTMA Rev. 3 Sheets 1, 2 and 3 Type III Characteristics: Luminaire mounting height 30 ft., 35 ft., FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 100% SUBMITTAL SIGNAL SPECS OCTOBER 9,2013 Page C - 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 40 ft., or 50 ft. Luminaire arms One Only Luminaire arm type Type 1 Luminaire arm length (max.) 16 ft. Signal arms One Only Type III standards shall conform to one of the following pre -approved plans, provided all other requirements noted herein have been satisfied. Maximum (x) (y) (z) signal arm loadings in cubic feet are noted after fabricator. Signal Arm Length (max) Fabricator-(x) (y) (z) Drawing No. 65 ft. Valmont Ind. Inc. (2947) DB00625-Rev.R, Shts. 1, 2, 3 & 4 and"J" luminaire arm 65 ft. Union Metal Corp. (2900) 71026-1387 Rev. R11 Shts. 1, 2 & 3 65 ft. Ameron Pole Prod. Div. (2900) W3724-1 Rev. J & W3724-2 Rev. G and "J" luminaire arm 65 ft. Northwest Signal Supply Inc. (2802) NWS 3500 Rev. 4 or NWS 3500B Rev. 4 45 ft. American Pole Structures, Inc. (1875) WS T3J-L, Rev. 11 Sheets 1 & 2 of 2 65 ft. American Pole Structures, Inc. (2913) WS T3J-H, Rev. 10 Sheets 1 & 2 of 2 65 ft West Coast Engineering Group 65 ft. Maico Industries (2947) 65 ft. KW Industries WSDOTTS-01 Rev. 3 Sheets 1, 2, and 3 WSDOTMA Rev. 3 Sheets 1, 2 and 3 and "J" luminaire arm 10-200 TSP-3 Rev. 5, Sheets 1, 2, and 3 The luminaire arm shall be Type 1, 16 foot maximum and the luminaire mounting height shall be 40 feet or 50 feet as noted in the plans. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 2S 1 Type SD standards require special design. All special design shall be based on the 2 latest AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, 3 Luminaires and Traffic Signals and pre -approved plans and as follows: 4 5 1. A 90 mph wind loading shall be used. 6 7 2. The Design Life and Recurrence Interval shall be 50 years for luminaire 8 support structures. 9 10 3. Fatigue design shall conform to AASHTO Section 11, Table 11-1 using fatigue 11 category III. 12 13 Complete calculations for structural design, including anchor bolt details, shall be 14 prepared by a Professional Engineer, licensed under Title 18 RCW, State of 15 Washington, in the branch of Civil or Structural Engineering or by an individual 16 holding valid registration in another state as a civil or structural Engineer. 17 18 All shop drawings and the cover page of all calculation submittals shall carry the 19 Professional Engineer's original signature, date of signature, original seal, 20 registration number, and date of expiration. The cover page shall include the 21 contract number, contract title, and sequential index to calculation page numbers. 22 Two copies of the associated design calculations shall be submitted for approval 23 along with shop drawings. 24 25 Details for handholes and luminaire arm connections are available from the Bridges 26 and Structures Office. 27 28 Foundations for various types of standards shall be as follows: 29 30 Type PPB As noted on Standard Plan 3-20.10. 31 Type PS As noted on Standard Plan 1-21.10-02 32 Type II As noted in the Plans. 33 Type III As noted in the Plans. 34 Type SD As noted in the Plans. 35 36 9-29.6(1) Steel Light and Signal Standards 37 Section 9-29.6(1) is supplement with the following: 38 39 (December 18, 2009 ******) 40 Traffic signal standards and illumination standards shall be furnished and installed 41 in accordance with the methods and materials noted in the applicable Standard 42 Plans, pre -approved plans, or special design plans. All welds shall comply with the 43 latest AASHTO Standard Specifications for Support of Highway Signs, Luminaires, 44 and Traffic Signals. Welding inspection shall comply with Section 6-03.3(25)A, 45 Welding Inspection. 46 47 All traffic signal standards and arms shall be round tapered. 48 FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Hardened washers shall be used with all signal arm -connecting bolts instead of lock washers. All signal arm AASHTO M 164 connecting bolts shall be tightened to 40 percent of proof load. Traffic signal standards shall conform to one of the following preapproved fabricator plans or approved equal: Type PPB, PS, and I Type II Type III IV and V DB00655 Rev. B DB00625 Rev. B, Sheets 1,2,and 3 DB00625 Rev. B, Sheets 1,2,and 3 and "J" luminaire arm 5000-4 M3723-1 Rev. E W 3724-1 Rev. E and W 3724-1 Rev D W 3724-1 Rev. E and W 3724-1 Rev D and "J" luminaire arm 3650-A Type SD Type SD standards require special design. All special design shall be based on the latest AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for highway signs, luminaires and traffic signals, preapproved plans, and as follows: A 90 mph wind loading shall be used. The design life and recurrence interval shall be 50 years for luminaire support structures exceeding 50 feet in height, and 25 years for all other luminaire support structures. Fatigue design shall conform to AASHTO Section 11, Table 11-1 using fatigue Category III. Complete calculations for structural design, including anchor bolt details, shall be prepared by a Professional Engineer, licensed under Title 18 RCW, State of Washington, in the branch of Civil or Structural Engineering or by an individual holding valid registration in another state as a civil or structural engineer. Traffic signal standards shall be engineered by pole manufacturer. Drawings shall be stamped by a licensed structural engineer with current valid State of Washington stamp. The foundation shall be engineered by a licensed structural engineer using pole manufacture data and project supplied soils testing report. Engineered/ stamped plans by a currently licensed structural engineer shall be submitted to the project engineer. Foundation work and pole manufacture shall not commence until engineered plans have been approved by the project engineer. All poles and mast arms shall be circular in cross-section. After delivering the poles or arms to the job site and before they are installed, they shall be stored in a place that will not inconvenience the public. All poles and arms shall be installed in compliance with Washington State Utility and Electrical Codes. Terminal cabinet(s) shall be installed on all Type II and Type III signal poles or where designated on the wiring diagrams in the Plans in accordance with the FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 27 1 material requirements of Section 9-29.25 of the Standard Specifications. Terminal 2 cabinets shall be installed at a height not to impede pedestrians. 3 4 Section 9-29.6(1) is supplement with the following: 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 (May 1, 2006 WSDOT NWR) Light and Signal Standard Painting Galvanized steel light and signal standards shall not be painted. 9-29.7(2) Fused Quick -Disconnect Kits Section 9-29.7(2) is supplemented with the following: (March 13 ,2012 ******) Fused quick -disconnect kits shall be of the SEC type or equivalent. Underground illumination splices shall be epoxy or underground service buss/light connector kits. Installation shall conform to details in the Standard Plans. 9-29.10(1) Conventional Roadway Luminaires Section 9-29.10(1) is supplemented with the following: (March 13 ,2012 ******) High-pressure sodium (HPS) vapor, 150 and 400 watts, flat glass luminaires shall be supplied and installed by the Contractor. They shall have an internal 240-volt regulator -type ballast (high power factor) prewired to the lamp socket and the terminal board. The terminal board shall have lugs of a 240-volt 3-wire power source. Terminals shall be labeled line -neutral -line. The neutral terminal shall be grounded to the metal housing of the luminaire. The refractor shall be a flat sheet of heat and impact resistant glass. The lamp socket shall be adjustable and factory set to produce IES pattern M-C-III. The lamps shall be 150 and 400 watt, HPS, and have a rated average life of not less than 24,000 hours. Conductors serving the luminaires shall be copper of the size shown on the Plans and shall run to the service pole in separate conduit from the signal conductors as shown in the plan view. Fused quick disconnect wye cable connector kits shall be installed at the handhole inside the base of each pole supporting a luminaire. Top conductors from the pole base to the luminaire shall be a minimum No. 12 stranded copper. The grounding conductor shall be connected to the neutral terminal in the luminaire fixture. Pole type and mounting heights shall be as specified in the Contract Plans and Standard Plans. 9-29.11(2) Photoelectric Control Section 9-29.11(2) is supplemented with the following: (December 18, 2012 ******) One photocell shall be installed for all luminaires in the signal system. The photocell shall be located on the top of the luminaire closest to the electrical service. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 28 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 9-29.13(3) Emergency Preemption Section 9-29.13(3) is supplemented with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) Emergency Preemption System (EPS) equipment shall be compatible with the operational requirements of the existing Opticom brand (GTT (formerly 3M)) emitters, detectors, phase discriminators and confirmation lights owned by the City. EPS equipment shall meet the following requirements: 1. Detector. The Contractor shall provide and install emergency preemption detectors at locations shown in the plans. The emergency preemption detectors shall be solid-state devices consisting of photoelectric cells and an amplifier mounted in weather -resistant housings. The detectors (GTT Model #711 or approved equal) shall be capable of detecting an optical signal generated by an Opticom brand emitter assembly (GTT). The detectors shall detect the optical signals from the emitter, amplify the signal, and transmit it to the phase discriminator. The detectors shall have a range control capable of being adjusted up to a maximum of 1/3 mile. Detectors shall be installed in a drilled and tapped hole in the top of the mast -arm or street -light arm, unless shown otherwise in the Plans. They shall be tightly fitted to point in the direction shown in the plan view. 2. Detector Lead-in Cable. The detector lead-in cable shall be GTT (formerly 3M) Opticom Model 138 shielded detector cable, or approved equal, No splicing will be allowed between the detector and the controller cabinet. All lead in cables shall be connected to terminals in the controller cabinet as shown in the wiring diagram. The shields shall be grounded to the grounding bar. 3. Confirmation Light. Mounted below the OPTICOM detector there shall be placed a white, 100 watt (minimum), standard screw socket, flood light which shall indicate, by being an, when the preemption interval is in effect and the desired phase is being held in a green display, unless otherwise noted in the plans. Indicator lights shall be actuated by utilizing the unused yellow output of pedestrian signal switch packs. 4. Multimode Phase Selector. The phase selector shall be GTT (formerly 3M) Opticom Model 764 capable of communication both IR and GPS based systems. Maintenance and operation manuals shall be furnished for all emergency preemption equipment to the City of Federal Way or its designated agents by the Contractor. 9-29.16 Vehicular Signal Heads, Displays, and Housings Section 9-29.16 is modified as follows: Paragraph 2, is deleted and replaced with the following: (February 24, 2012 ******) FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 All lenses shall meet I.T.E. specifications for light output with 12-inch-diameter faces. All vehicular signal heads shall be dark green baked enamel and shall be equipped with 5" wide black polycarbonate back plates and black-polycarbonate tunnel visors of a length equal to the lens diameter. All hardware for attaching visors and back plates shall be non -corrosive stainless steel. Vehicle signal head polycarbonate materials shall not be painted. A 2-inch-wide strip of yellow retro-reflective, type IV prismatic sheeting, conforming to the requirements of Section 9-28.12, shall be applied around the perimeter of each backplate. 9-29.16(2) Conventional Traffic Signal Heads 9-29.16(2)A Optical Units Section 9-29.16(2)A is deleted and replaced with the following: (December 18, 2009 ******) Lenses shall be of the color indicated, circular in shape, with a visible diameter of 12 inches, as specified in the contract, and of such design as to give an outward and downward distribution of light with a minimum above the horizontal. The lenses shall be standard red, amber, and green, prismed traffic signal lenses and shall conform to the specifications of ITE Standards (Standards for Adjustable Face Vehicle Traffic Control Signal Heads, 1977 edition). The lenses shall fit into a red silicon gasket in a manner to render the interior of the lens and reflector weather and dust -tight. Signal heads shall have hinged aluminum reflector rings. The lens and gasket shall be secured to the door with four noncorrosive lens clips. LED Traffic Signal Modules All traffic signal displays shall be the Light Emitting Diode (LED) type and shall be from one of the following manufacturers: Dialight Corporation 1913 Atlantic Avenue Manasquan, NJ 08736 Telephone: (732) 223-9400 FAX: (732) 223-8788 GELcore, LLC 6810 Halie Drive Valley View, OH 44125 Telephone: (216) 606-6555 FAX: (216)606-6556 Precision Solar Controls, Inc. 2960 Market Street Garland, TX 75041 Telephone: (972) 278-0553 FAX: (972) 271-9583 44 Each LED signal module shall be designed to be installed in the doorframe of a 45 standard traffic signal housing. The lamp socket, reflector, reflector holder, and lens 46 used with an incandescent lamp shall not be used in a signal section in which a 47 LED signal module is installed. The installation of an LED signal module shall not 48 require any modification to the housing. The LED signal module shall be a single, 49 self-contained device, not requiring on -site assembly for installation into an existing 50 traffic signal housing. 51 52 All red LED signal modules shall be manufactured with a matrix of AllnGaP LED 53 light sources and green LED signal modules shall be manufactured with a matrix of FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 30 1 InGaN LED light sources. The LED traffic signal module shall be operationally 2 compatible with controllers and conflict monitors on this Project. The LED lamp unit 3 shall contain a disconnect that will show an open switch to the conflict monitor 4 when less than 60 percent of the LEDs in the unit are operational. 5 6 Each LED signal module shall conform to the current standards in Institute of 7 Transportation Engineers (ITE) VTCSH Part 2 and a Certificate of Compliance with 8 these standards shall be submitted by the manufacturer for each type of signal 9 head. The certificate shall state that the lot of signal heads meets the current ITE 10 specification. A label shall be placed on each LED signal module certifying 11 conformance to this specification. The manufacturer's name, trademark, serial 12 number and other necessary identification shall be permanently marked on the 13 backside of the LED signal module. LED signal modules used on this Project shall 14 be from the same manufacturer. A label shall be provided on the LED housing and 15 the Contractor shall mark the label with a permanent marker to note the 16 installation date. 17 18 LED signals shall show no evidence of illumination for input voltages below 19 35 volts. LED signals shall supply illumination current (unregulated) for all input 20 voltages higher than 45 volts (and conform to appropriate intensity requirements 21 specified above 80 volts). 22 23 The manufacturer shall provide a written warranty against defects in materials and 24 workmanship for the LED signal modules for a period of 60 months after 25 installation of the modules. All warranty documentation shall be given to the 26 Engineer prior to installation. 27 28 9-29.16(2)B Signal Housing 29 Section 9-29.16(2)B is supplemented with the following: 30 31 (December 18, 2009 ******) 32 The signal housing shall be designed to withstand winds of 80 miles per hour with 33 a 0.25-gust factor without permanent distortion or failing (torque at attachment of 34 6,000 pound -feet). 35 36 9-29.17 Signal Head Mounting Brackets and Fittings 37 Section 9-29.17 is supplemented with the following: 38 39 (December 18, 2009 ******) 40 Mast arm mounting hardware for vehicle signal heads shall be clamp style 41 plumbizer PELCD AS-3008, or approved equal, and shall be field installed by the 42 Contractor. Fittings shall be painted with two (2) coats of factory -applied traffic- 43 signal dark green baked enamel. A watertight seal shall be provided where the 44 signal head mounting bracket attaches to the mast arm or signal pole. 45 46 Components for type D and type K mounting hardware shall be per Section 9-29.17 47 of the Standard Specifications. All components shall be painted with traffic -signal 48 dark green baked enamel. 49 50 9-29.18(3) Vacant 51 Section 9-29.18(3) is deleted and replaced with the following: FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-31 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 (March 14, 2012 ******) 9-29.18(3) Video Detection System NEW SECTION (March 14, 2012 ******) All video detection system items and materials furnished shall be new, unused, current production models installed and operational in a user environment and shall be items currently in distribution. The products shall have a proven record of field use at other installations for at least two (2) years of service not including prototype field trials prior to installation. Contractor shall provide Econolite AutoScope Solo Terra, Trafficon or approved equal video detection system. Approved equal video detection systems shall meet the following: General The detection of vehicles passing through the field -of -view of an image sensor shall be made available to a large variety of end user applications as simple contact closure outputs that reflect the current real-time detector or alarm state (on/off) or as summary traffic statistics that are reported locally or remotely. The contact closure outputs shall be provided to a traffic signal controller and comply with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) type C or D detector rack file standards. The system architecture shall fully support Ethernet networking of system components through a variety of industry standard and commercially available infrastructures that are used in the traffic industry. The data communications shall support direct connect, modem and multi -drop interconnects. Simple, standard Ethernet wiring shall be supported to minimize overall system cost and improve reliability, utilizing existing infrastructure and ease of system installation and maintenance. Both streaming video and data communications shall be capable of being interconnected over long distance through fiber optic, microwave or other commonly used digital communications transport configurations. In terms of the software application side of the network, the system shall be integrated through a client -server relationship. A communications server application shall provide the data communications interface between as few as one to as many as hundreds of Machine Vision Processors (MVP) sensors (otherwise referred to as video detection cameras with built in processors) and a number of client applications. The client applications shall either be hosted on the same PC as the communications server or may be distributed over a local area network of PC's using the industry standard TCP/IP network protocol. Multiple client applications shall execute simultaneously on the same host or multiple hosts, depending on the network configuration. Additionally, a web -browser interface shall allow use of industry standard internet web browsers to connect to MVP sensors for setup, maintenance and playing digital streaming video. System Hardware The video detection system hardware shall consist of the following components: 1. A color, 22x zoom Machine Vision Processor (MVP) sensor. 2. A modular cabinet interface unit. 3. A communication interface panel. 4. Surge suppresser/ lightning protection. 5. A portable color monitor to be permanently placed within the signal controller cabinet. 6. All other necessary equipment for setup, maintenance and operation of the video detection system including but not limited to programming device and specialty tools. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 The real-time performance shall be observed by viewing the video output from the sensor with overlaid flashing detectors to indicate current detection state (on/off). The MVP sensor shall be capable of optionally storing cumulative traffic statistics internally in non-volatile memory for later retrieval and analysis. The MVP shall communicate to the modular cabinet interface unit via the communications interface panel and the software applications using the industry standard TCP/IP network protocol. The MVP shall have a built-in, Ethernet -ready, Internet Protocol (IP) address and shall be addressable with no plug in devices or converters required. The MVP shall provide standard MPEG-4 streaming digital video. Achievable frame rates vary from 5 to 30 frames per second as a function of video quality and available bandwidth. The modular cabinet interface unit shall communicate directly with up to eight (8) MVP sensors and shall comply with form factor and electrical characteristics to plug directly into a NEMA type C or D detector rack providing up to thirty-two (32) inputs and sixty- four (64) outputs to a traffic signal controller. The communications interface panel shall provide four (4) sets of three (3) electrical terminations for three wire power cables for up to eight (8) MVP sensors that may be mounted on a pole or mast arm with a traffic signal cabinet or junction box. The communication interface panel shall provide high-energy transient protection to electrically protect the modular cabinet interface unit and connected MVP sensors. The communications interface panel shall provide single -point Ethernet connectivity via RJ45 connector for communication to and between the modular cabinet interface module and the MVP sensors. System Software The MVP sensor embedded software shall incorporate multiple applications that perform a variety of diagnostic, installation, fault tolerant operations, data communications, digital video streaming and vehicle detection processing. The detection shall be reliable, consistent and perform under all weather, lighting and traffic congestion levels. An embedded web server shall permit standard internet browsers to connect and perform basic configuration, maintenance and video streaming services. There shall be a suite of client applications that reside on the host client/server PC. The applications shall execute under Microsoft Windows 7, Vista or XR Client applications shall include: 1. Master network browser: Learn a network of connected modular cabinet interface units and MVP sensors, display basic information and launch applications software to perform operations within that system of sensors. 2. Configuration setup: Create and modify detector configurations to be executed on the MVP sensor and the modular cabinet interface unit. 3. Operation log: Retrieve, display and save field hardware run-time operation logs of special events that have occurred. 4. Streaming video player: Play and record streaming video with flashing detector overlay. 5. Data retrieval: Fetch once or poll for traffic data and alarms and store on PC storage media. 6. Communications server: Provide fault -tolerant, real-time TCP/IP communications to/from all devices and client applications with full logging for systems integration. FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Machine Vision Processor (MVP) Sensor The MVP sensor shall be an integrated imaging color CCD array with zoom lens optics, high-speed, dual -core image processing hardware bundled into a sealed enclosure. The CCD array shall be directly controlled be the dual -core processor, thus providing high -quality video for detection that has virtually no noise to degrade detection performance. It shall be possible to zoom the lens as required for setup and operation. It shall provide JPEG video compression as well as standard MPEG-4 digital streaming video with flashing detector overlay. The MVP shall provide direct real-time iris and shutter speed control. The MVP image sensor shall be equipped with an integrated 22x zoom lens that can be changed using configuration computer software. The digital streaming video output and all data communications shall be transmitted over the three -wire power cable. The MVP sensor shall operate on 110/220 VAC, 50/60Hz at a maximum of 25 watts. The camera and processor electronics shall consume a maximum of 10 watts and the remaining 15 watts shall support an enclosure heater. Placement of detection zones shall be by means of a PC with a Windows 7, Vista or XP operating system with a keyboard and mouse. The detection zones shall be superimposed on images of the traffic scenes and viewable as such on the PC monitor. The detection zones shall be created by using a mouse to draw the detection zones on the PC monitor. Using the mouse and keyboard it shall be possible to place, size and orient detection zones to provide optimal road coverage for vehicle detection. It shall be possible to download detector configurations from the PC to the MVP sensor and cabinet interface module, to retrieve the detector configuration that is currently running in the MVP sensor and to back up detector configurations by saving them to a PC storage device. The video detection system shall optimally detect vehicle passage and presence when the MVP sensor is mounted thirty (30) feet or higher above the roadway, when the image sensor is adjacent to the desired coverage area and when the distance to the farthest detection zone locations are not greater than ten (10) times the mounting height of the MVP. The recommended deployment geometry for optimal detection also requires that there be an unobstructed view of each traveled lane where detection is required. Although optimal detection may be obtained when the MVP is mounted directly above the traveled lanes, the MVP shall not be required to be directly over the roadway. The MVP shall be able to view either approaching or receding traffic or both in the same field of view. The preferred MVP sensor orientation shall be to view approaching traffic since there are more high contrast features on vehicles as viewed from the front rather than the rear. The MVP sensor placed at a mounting height that maximizes vehicle image occlusion shall be able to simultaneously monitor a maximum of six (6) traffic lanes when mounted at the road -side or up to eight (8) traffic lanes when mounted in the center with four lanes on each side. Modular Cabinet Interface Unit The modular cabinet interface unit shall provide the hardware and software means for up to eight (8) MVP sensors to communicate real-time detection states and alarms to a local traffic signal controller. It shall comply with the electrical and protocol specifications of the detector rack standards. The card shall have 1500 Vrms isolation between rack logic ground and street wiring. The modular cabinet interface unit shall be a simple interface card that plugs directly into a NEMA type C or D detector rack. The modular cabinet interface unit shall FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 occupy only two (2) slots of the detector rack. The modular cabinet interface unit shall accept up to sixteen (16) phase inputs and shall provide up to twenty-four (24) detector outputs. Communications Interface Panel The communications interface panel shall support up to eight (8) MVP sensors and shall accept 110/220 VAC, 50/60 Hz Power. The communications interface panel shall provide predefined wire termination blocks for MVP sensor power connections, a Broadband -over -Power -Line (BPL) transceiver to support up to 10Mb/s interdevice communications, electrical surge protectors to isolate the modular cabinet interface unit and MVP sensors and an interface connector to cable directly to the modular cabinet interface unit. The communications interface panel shall provide power for up to eight (8) MVP sensors, taking local line voltage 110/220 VAC, 50/60 Hz and producing 110/220 VAC, 50/60 Hz, at about 30 watts to each MVP sensor. Two 1.25 amp SLO-BLO fuses shall protect the communications interface panel. Surge Suppresser An EDCO CX06-BNCY or approved equal transient surge suppresser shall be provided for each MVP sensor. Installation and Training The product supplier of the video detection system shall supervise the installation and the testing of the video equipment. A factory certified representative from the manufacturer shall be on -site during installation. The factory representative shall install, make fully operational, and test the system as indicated on the intersection drawings and this specification. One day of training shall be provided to personnel of the City of Federal Way and King County in the operation, set-up and maintenance of the video detection system. Instruction and materials shall be produced for a maximum of 7 persons and shall be conducted at the City of Federal Way City Hall or King County signal shop. Warranty The video detection system shall be warranted against manufacturing defects in materials and workmanship for a period of no less than three (3) years from date of installation. The video detection supplier shall provide all documentation necessary to maintain and operate the system. The supplier shall maintain a program for technical support and software updates following the expiration of the warranty period. 9-29.19 Pedestrian Push Buttons Section 9-29.19 is deleted and replaced with the following: (August 1, 2012 ******) The Contractor shall provide and install accessible pedestrian pushbuttons and signs, as shown on the Plans. The position of the pedestrian pushbuttons shall be located in a manner such that the tactile arrow is aligned parallel to the direction of travel for the crosswalk which the pushbutton is intended to serve; however final positioning for the optimum effectiveness shall be approved by the Engineer. Accessible Pedestrian Pushbutton units shall be Campbell Company Model Advisor Advanced Accessible Pedestrian Station (AAPS) or approved equal and shall meet the following requirements: FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 35 2 Pushbuttons shall be mounted to the poles by means of stainless steel bolts. All 3 mountings shall be securely fastened as approved by the Engineer. 4 5 The network based centralized pushbutton station shall be installed in the 6 controller cabinet. The centralized station shall be in continuous communication 7 with each pedestrian pushbutton station through direct Ethernet access or remote 8 network connections allowing for real time system monitoring and control of 9 operating parameters. Communication shall provide for the ability to upload files 10 directly to each individual pedestrian station or download generated reports. All 11 connections shall be made using factory produced cables with modular plugs. 12 13 The sign legend to be used shall be sign designation R10-3e and shall be nine (9) 14 inches by fifteen (15) inches. All mounting bolts shall be non -corrosive stainless 15 steel. 16 17 The pedestrian pushbutton housing shall be aluminum and shall be painted black. 18 Unit(s) shall operate at a temperature range of -35C to 85C. Power requirements 19 shall be 120 VAC, 60 Hz (100 ma, typical +/- 20%). 20 21 Pedestrian indicators shall include an audible speaker, call confirmation LED and 22 vibrotactile arrow. The audible speaker shall be programmable to have a button 23 locator tone, acknowledgement tone/message, walk cycle tone/message and 24 clearance tone/message. The unit(s) shall have automatic volume controls for 25 message strength over ambient noise levels. The walk tone/message shall be 26 programmable to stop with the walk signal or other user settable time. The unit(s) 27 shall be user settable for Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) message initiation with 28 an extended press or on call. 29 30 The call confirmation LED shall be red with 160 degree view ability and once 31 activated shall remain illuminated until the corresponding walk indication is given. 32 An audible acknowledgement message of "WAIT" shall accompany each activation 33 of the call confirmation LED. 34 35 The locator tone shall be active for a time of 0.15 seconds or less and shall repeat 36 at 1 second intervals. The locator tone shall be intensity responsive to ambient 37 sound and be audible from six (6) feet to twelve (12) feet from the pushbutton 38 with a maximum of 5 dBA louder than ambient sound. 39 40 A walk cycle audible message shall be set for each pushbutton unit and shall be 41 patterned after the model: "Broadway. Walk sign is on to cross Broadway." The 42 walk cycle message shall be intensity responsive to ambient sound with a volume 5 43 dBA above ambient sound up to a maximum volume of 100 dBA. The walk cycle 44 message shall be audible from the beginning of the associated crosswalk during the 45 walk interval only. 46 47 The vibrotactile arrow shall be located on the pushbutton and shall have high 48 visibility contrast of either light on dark or dark on light. The pushbutton units shall 49 be installed in a manner such that the vibrotactile arrow is aligned parallel to the FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 direction of travel for the crosswalk which the pushbutton is intended to serve. The vibrotactile arrow shall activate with the walk cycle. 9-29.20 Pedestrian Signals Section 9-29.20 is supplemented with the following: (December 12, 2011) The symbol message modules shall plug directly into the transformer or be solid- state modules. Side mountings shall be clamshell mountings Type "E," as shown on WSDOT Standard Plan J-20.16-00 unless otherwise noted on The Plans. All terminal compartments shall be painted in the same manner as specified for signal housings. All pedestrian head mounting bolts shall be noncorrosive stainless steel. Where pedestrian signal heads are to be fastened to the vehicle signal pole, the Contractor shall securely attach the clamshell mounting to the pole using stainless steel Allen -head bolts. Pedestrian display housings shall have a minimum depth capable of accommodating a Campbell Advisor Pedestrian Pushbutton Controller in the rear of the housing. 9-29.20(1) LED Pedestrian Displays Section 9-29.20(1) is modified as follows: Section 9-29.20(1), Paragraph 1, Items la, 1b, 1c, le, 1f, 1g and 1h are deleted. (March 6, 2012 ******) Section 9-29.20(1) is supplemented with the following: (December 18, 2009 ******) Pedestrian signals shall be LED Countdown units as manufactured by Dialite Corporation or approved equal per the specifications included in the appendices of these Special Provisions. All pedestrian signal displays shall be the light emitting diode (LED) type with displays for "HAND", "MAN" and a countdown timer. Each LED pedestrian signal module shall not require special tools for installation. The installation of an LED pedestrian module shall not require any modification to the housing. Each LED pedestrian module shall be a single, self-contained device, not requiring any on -site assembly for installation into any pedestrian signal housing. The power supply for the LED pedestrian module may be packaged as a separate module. All pedestrian "HAND" modules and countdown timer display modules shall be Portland Orange and shall conform to current ITE Standards for size, chromaticity, and intensity. LED pedestrian "HAND" modules shall be manufactured with a matrix of AllnGaP LED light sources. All pedestrian walking "MAN" modules shall be Lunar White and shall conform to current ITE Standards for size, chromaticity, and intensity. LED pedestrian walking "MAN" modules shall be manufactured with a FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 37 1 matrix of InGaN LED light sources. The "HAND" and walking "MAN" message- 2 bearing surfaces shall be filled (not outline) symbols. The LED pedestrian modules 3 shall be operationally compatible with controller and conflict monitors on this 4 Project. 5 6 The LED pedestrian module shall be rated for use in the ambient operating 7 temperature range of minus 40 degrees C to 74 degrees C. Each LED pedestrian 8 module shall be protected against dust and moisture intrusion per the NEMA 9 Moisture Resistance STD 250-1991 for Type 4 enclosures to protect all internal 10 components. The assembly, manufacturing, and mounting of the LED pedestrian 11 module shall be designed to assure all internal LED and electronic components are 12 adequately supported to withstand mechanical shock and vibration from high winds 13 and other sources. The manufacturer's name, trademark, serial number, and other 14 necessary identification shall be permanently marked on the backside of the LED 15 pedestrian module. LED signal pedestrian modules used on this Project shall be 16 from the same manufacturer. A label shall be provided on the LED housing, and 17 the Contractor shall mark the label with a permanent marker to note the 18 installation date. 19 20 LED pedestrian modules shall operate at a maximum power consumption of 15W. 21 Each LED pedestrian module shall be operated from a 60 plus 3-Hz AC line over a 22 range of 80 VAC to 135 VAC. Nominal operating voltage for all measurements shall 23 be 120 plus 3 volts rms. The LED circuitry shall prevent flicker at less than 100 Hz 24 over the voltage range specified above. Fluctuations in the line voltage specified 25 above shall not affect luminous intensity by more than plus 10 percent. The signal 26 module on -board noise transients and low -repetition high-energy transients shall 27 be as stated in Section 2.1.6, NEMA Standard TS-2, 1992. The individual LED light 28 sources shall be wired so that catastrophic failure of any one LED light source will 29 result in the loss of not more than 20 percent of the signal module light sources. 30 LED pedestrian signal modules shall provide a power factor of 0.90, or greater, 31 when operated at nominal operating voltage, and 25 degrees C. Total harmonic 32 distortion induced into an AC power line by an LED pedestrian module shall not 33 exceed 20 percent. Each LED pedestrian module and associated onboard circuitry 34 shall meet Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Title 47, Subpart 13, 35 Section 15 regulations concerning the emission of electrical noise. Two secured, 36 color -coded, 600V, 20AWG minimum, jacketed wires, conforming to the National 37 Electric Code, rated for service at 105 degrees C, are to be provided for electrical 38 connection. 39 40 LED signals shall show no evidence of illumination for input voltages below 41 35 volts. LED signals shall supply illumination current (unregulated) for all input 42 voltages higher than 45 volts (and conform to appropriate intensity requirements 43 specified above 80 volts). 44 45 The manufacturer shall provide a written warranty against defects in materials and 46 workmanship for the LED signal modules for a period of 60 months and against 47 loss of intensity below 50 percent of original values for a period of 36 months after 48 installation of the modules. All warranty documentation shall be given to the 49 Engineer prior to installation. 50 FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 9-29.20(2) Neon Grid Type Section 9-29.20(2) is deleted. (March 13, 2012 ******) 9-29.25 Amplifier, Transformer, and Terminal Cabinets Section 9-29.25 is supplemented with the following: (February 24, 2012 ******) Where noted on the Plans, terminal cabinets shall be furnished and installed on mast arm poles. Nominal dimensions shall be 16 inches high by 12 inches wide by 5 inches deep. Terminal cabinets shall be mounted at a minimum height of seven (7) feet to maintain ADA accessible pathways. Numbered terminal strips shall be installed in each cabinet with sufficient connections to accommodate all necessary wires and specs as shown on the Wiring Diagram. The unit shall be fastened to the pole shaft with a minimum of three (3) self - tapping galvanized metal screws employing minimum 1-inch-diameter flat washers on the inside of the cabinet. Following installation, an epoxy sealant shall be used to provide a rain tight seal between the pole shaft and the cabinet back. SECTION 9-34, PAVEMENT MARKING MATERIAL 9-34.3(4) Type D — Liquid Cold Applied Methyl Methacrylate Section 9-34.3(4) is supplemented with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) The methyl methacrylate (MMA) material shall be formulated as a long -life durable pavement marking system capable of providing a minimum of two years of continuous performance. The material shall be a catalyzed methyl methacrylate (MMA), wet -continuous reflective product and placed shall have a dry time (cure) to the touch of no more than 30 minutes. The material shall be capable of retaining reflective glass beads and ceramic micro -crystalline elements of the drop - on or spray -on type as specified by the manufacturer. The binder shall be lead free and suitable for bituminous and concrete pavements. 9-34.4 Glass Beads for Pavement Marking Materials Section 9-34.4 is supplemented with the following: (March 13, 2012 ******) Methyl Methacrylate Pavement Markings Optics Glass Beads FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Surface -drop glass beads shall be the "Utah Blend" with a Methacrylate compatible coupling agent approved by the material manufacturer. Glass beads shall be applied at a rate of eight (8) to ten (10) pounds per one hundred square feet. Bonded Core Elements Surface -drop ceramic elements shall be the Series 50M or 70M with a Methacrylate compatible coupling agent approved by the material manufacturer. Elements shall meet or exceed a minimum initial value of 150 mcd for white and 125 mcd for yellow per ASTM 2176. The bonded core reflective elements shall contain either clear or yellow tinted microcrystalline ceramic beads bonded to the opacified core. These elements shall not be manufactured using lead, chromate or arsenic. All "dry -performing" microcrystalline ceramic beads bonded to the core shall have a minimum index of refraction of 1.8 when tested using the liquid oil immersion method. All "wet performing" microcrystalline ceramic beads bonded to the core shall have a minimum index of refraction of 2.30 when tested using the liquid oil immersion method. There are two gradations for the bonded core elements, standard size and "S" series. "S" series is a slightly finer gradation of elements compared to standard. Element Gradations Mass Percent Passin ASTM D1214 US Mesh Micron Standard Elements "S" Series 12 1700 80-100 85-100 14 1410 45-80 70-96 16 1180 5-40 50-90 18 1000 0-20 5-60 20 850 0-7 0-25 30 600 0-7 J A sample of bonded core reflective elements supplied by the manufacturer shall show resistance to corrosion of their surface after exposure to a 1% solution (by weight) of sulfuric acid. The 1% acid solution shall be made by adding 5.7 cc of concentrated acid into 1000cc of distilled water. CAUTION: Always add the concentrated acid into the water, not the reverse. The bonded core elements are surface treated to optimize embedment and adhesion to the MMA binder. Elements treated for use with MMA shall have identification on packaging or label to indicate use with the MMA binder. Bonded core elements shall be applied at a rate of ten (10) grams per four (4) inch wide by one (1) linear foot of marking. Reflectance FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C - 40 1 Typical initial retro reflectance values are shown in the Table below. Typical retro 2 reflectivity is averaged over many readings. Minimum Retro reflectivity results 3 represent average performance for smooth pavement surfaces. Values represent 4 both standard and "S" Series elements. Results may vary due to differences in 5 pavement type and surface roughness. Increased element drop rate may be 6 necessary to compensate for increased surface area characteristic of rough 7 pavement surfaces. The initial retro reflectance of a single installation shall be the 8 average value determined by the measurement procedures outlined in ASTM E 9 1710, using a 30-meter (98.4 feet) retro-reflectometer. RL shall be expressed in 10 units of millicandelas per square foot per foot-candle [mcd(ft-2)(fc-1)]. 11 12 The optics incorporated into the pavement marking system shall be tested and 13 certified by an independent laboratory to meet ASTM E2177 for wet -recovery and 14 ASTM E2176 for wet -continuous performance levels. 15 16 The pavement marking system installed shall meet a minimum Dry reflectance 17 value of 700 MCD/M2/LX for white pavement markings and 500 MCD/M2/LX for 18 yellow pavement markings and wet -recovery (as described by ASTM 2177) 19 reflectance value of 375 MCD/M2/LX for white pavement markings and 280 20 MCD/M2/LX for yellow pavement markings, and wet -continuous (as described by 21 ASTM 2176 testing) reflectance values of 150 MCD/M2/LX for white pavement 22 markings and 125 MCD/M2/LX for yellow pavement markings as measured with a 23 30 meter device approved by the Traffic Engineering Division (TED). 24 25 The Contractor will be required to take and record readings every 500 feet utilizing 26 a 30 meter device approved by the Traffic Engineering Division. These readings 27 shall be recorded on the daily report and submitted to the project engineer at the 28 end of each work day or shift. 29 Minimum Initial Retro Reflectance Values 1 White Yellow D ASTM E1710 700 500 Wet recovery ASTM E2177 375 280 Wet continuous ASTM E2176 150 125 30 31 END OF DIVISION 9 FEDERAL WAY PROGRESSIVE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SIGNAL SPECS 100% SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page C-41 /wtranspOGROUP WHAT TRANSPORTATION CAN BE. Illumination Supporting Calculations Federal Way Progressive — S 340t" Street 12152.00 October 9, 2013 RESUBMIT -FED OCT 3 0 2013 ''ITY OF FEDERAL WAY CD5 Transpo Group 11730 118th Avenue N.E., Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034 425-821-3665 Fax: 425-825-8434 �-C Ylighting software by Lighting Anolysts Luminaire Definition(s) GE451006 Road 320th 12FT 150W HPS 12' arm 30' MH Filename Lumens Per Lamp Number of Lamps Total Lamp Lumens Arrangement Lamp Lumens Arrangement Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Efficiency (%) Total Light Loss Factor Luminaire Watts Arrangement Watts Arrangement Arm Length Offset Pole Mounted Road Classification Upward Waste Light Ratio Excellence in Illumination Engineering Software since 1484 www.agi32.com p�someiownw+�aupKnoMoh±r. Inc GE451006.IES 16000 1 16000 16000 12229 12229 76 0.620 150 150 SINGLE 13.5 0 Type III, Medium, Full Cutoff (deprecated) 0.00 Luminaire Classification System (LCS) Lumens % Lamp % Luminaire LCS-FL 1095.4 6.8 9.0 LCS-FM 3625.8 22.7 29.6 LCS-FH 2314.3 14.5 18.9 LCS-FVH 7.9 0.0 0.1 LCS-BL 1089.7 6.8 8.9 LCS-BM 2862.4 17.9 23.4 LCS-BH 1218.4 7.6 10.0 LCS-BVH 14.9 0.1 0.1 LCS-UL 0.0 0.0 0.0 LCS-UH 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 12228.8 76.4 100,0 B3-U1-G3 Indoor Classification Direct LER 82 GE451006 Road PSE 8FT-25OW 25OW HPS 8' arm 30' MH Filename GE451006.IES Lumens Per Lamp 28000 Number of Lamps 1 Total Lamp Lumens 28000 Arrangement Lamp Lumens 28000 Arrangement Luminaire Lumens 21400 Luminaire Lumens 21400 Luminaire Efficiency (%) 76 Total Light Loss Factor 0.620 Luminaire Watts 250 1 AGi32 - Copyright 1999-2011 by Lighting Analysts, Inc. 10/9/2013 Job File: Illumination Layout_Federal Way Progressive.AGI Calculations based on published IES Methods and recommendations, values rounded for display purposes. Results derived from content of manufacturers photometric file. AG132 ,--lighting software by Lighting Analysts Luminaire Definition(s) Arrangement Watts Arrangement Arm Length Offset Pole Mounted Road Classification Upward Waste Light Ratio Luminaire Classification System (LCS) LCS-FL LCS-FM LCS-FH LCS-FVH LCS-BL LCS-BM LCS-BH LCS-BVH LCS-UL LCS-UH Total BUG Rating Indoor Classification LER GE451006 Road 12FT 40OW HPS 121 arm 401 MH Filename Lumens Per Lamp Number of Lamps Total Lamp Lumens Arrangement Lamp Lumens Arrangement Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Efficiency (%) Total Light Loss Factor Luminaire Watts Arrangement Watts Arrangement Arm Length Offset Pole Mounted Road Classification Upward Waste Light Ratio Excellence in Illumination Engineering Software since 1984 www.cigi32.com smmaw bofna` caorfgly 2006 Uphlirg Araytt, IIM - Cont. 250 SINGLE 9.5 0 Type III, Medium, Full Cutoff (deprecated) 0.00 Lumens o Lamp % Luminaire 1917.0 6.8 9.0 6345.1 22.7 29.6 4050.0 14.5 18.9 13.9 0.0 0.1 1906.9 6.8 8.9 5009.3 17.9 23.4 2132.1 7.6 10.0 26.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21400.3 76.4 100.0 B4-U1-G3 Direct 86 GE451006.IES 50000 1 50000 50000 38215 38215 76 0.620 400 400 SINGLE 13.5 0 Type III, Medium, Full Cutoff (deprecated) 0.00 Luminaire Classification System (LCS) Lumens % Lamp % Luminaire LCS-FL 3423.2 6.8 9.0 LCS-FM 11330.5 22.7 29.6 LCS-FH 7232.2 14.5 18.9 LCS-FVH 24.8 0.0 0.1 LCS-BL 3405.2 6.8 8.9 L AGi32 - Copyright 1999-2011 by Lighting Analysts, Inc. 10/9/2013 Job File: Illumination Layout_Federal Way ProgresSive.AGI Calculations based on published IES Methods and recommendations, values rounded for display purposes. Results derived from content of manufacturers photometric file. <��-AG13 -`--lighting software by Lighting Analysts Excellence in Illumination Engineering Software since 1984 www.agi32.com SOMPW- bumen COpY�2:2006 LOON AfayOl, Inc. Luminaire Definition(s) - Cont. LCS-BM 8945.1 17.9 23.4 LCS-BH 3807.4 7.6 10.0 LCS-BVH 46.5 0.1 0.1 LCS-UL 0.0 0.0 0.0 LCS-UH 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 38214.9 76.4 100.0 BUG Rating B5-U1-G4 Indoor Classification Direct LER 96 GE451006 Signal LOFT 400W HPS 10' arm 40' MH Filename Lumens Per Lamp Number of Lamps Total Lamp Lumens Arrangement Lamp Lumens Arrangement Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Efficiency M Lamp Lumen Depreciation (LLD) Luminaire Dirt Depreciation (LDD) Ballast Factor (BF) Total Light Loss Factor Luminaire Watts Arrangement Watts Arrangement Arm Length offset Pole Mounted Road Classification Upward Waste Light Ratio Luminaire Classification System (LCS) LCS-FL LCS-FM LCS-FH LCS-FVH LCS-BL LCS-BM LCS-BH LCS-BVH LCS-UL LCS-UH Total BUG Rating Indoor Classification LER GE451006.IES 50000 1 50000 50000 38215 38215 76 0.620 1.000 1.000 0.620 400 400 SINGLE 11.5 0 Type III, Medium, Full Cutoff (deprecated) 0.00 Lumens o Lamp o Luminaire 3423.2 6.8 9.0 11330.5 22.7 29.6 7232.2 14.5 18.9 24.8 0.0 0.1 3405.2 6.8 8.9 8945.1 17.9 23.4 3807.4 7.6 10.0 46.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 38214.9 76.4 100.0 B5-U1-G4 Direct 96 3 AGi32 - Copyright 1999-2011 by Lighting Analysts, Inc. 10/9/2013 Job File: Illumination Layout_Federal Way Progressive.AGI Calculations based on published IES Methods and recommendations, values rounded for display purposes. Results derived from content of manufacturers photometric file. AG132M -!�-Iighfing software by Lighting Analysts Luminaire Definition (s) GE451006 Signal 8FT 40OW HPS 8' arm 40' MH Filename Lumens Per Lamp Number of Lamps Total Lamp Lumens Arrangement Lamp Lumens Arrangement Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Efficiency M Lamp Lumen Depreciation (LLD) Luminaire Dirt Depreciation (LDD) Ballast Factor (BF) Total Light Loss Factor Luminaire Watts Arrangement Watts Arrangement Arm Length Offset Pole Mounted Road Classification Upward Waste Light Ratio Luminaire Classification System (LCS) LCS-FL LCS-FM LCS-FH LCS-FVH LCS-BL LCS-BM LCS-BH LCS-BVH LCS-UL LCS-UH Total BUG Rating Indoor Classification LER Excellence in Illumination Engineering Software since 1984 www,agi32.com arwitboir*caar +20Cauy�a MM.�c - Cont. GE451006.IES 50000 1 50000 50000 38215 38215 76 0.620 1.000 1.000 0.620 400 400 SINGLE 9.5 0 Type III, Medium, Full Cutoff (deprecated) 0.00 Lumens % Lamp % Luminaire 3423.2 6.8 9.0 11330.5 22.7 29.6 7232.2 14.5 18.9 24.8 0.0 0.1 3405.2 6.8 8.9 8945.1 17.9 23.4 3807.4 7.6 10.0 46.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 38214.9 76.4 100.0 B5-Ul-G4 Direct 96 4 AGi32 - Copyright 1999-2011 by Lighting Analysts, Inc. 10/9/2013 Job File: Illumination Layout -Federal Way Progressive.AGI Calculations based on published IES Methods and recommendations, values rounded for display purposes. Results derived from content of manufacturers photometric file. 1 I lighting sottwo by Lighting Analysts Calculation Summary IN - S 340TH ST & SR 99 Project: Progressive Polygon Coordinates in Feet Point Spacing L-R 5 Point Spacing T-B 5 Grid Orient 0 Grid Tilt 0 Meter Type Horizontal Illuminance (Fc) Average 2.30 Maximum 3.6 Minimum 0.8 Avg/Min 2.88 Max/Min 4.50 RD - S 340TH ST Project: Progressive Polygon Coordinates in Feet Point Spacing L-R 5 Point Spacing T-B 5 Grid Orient 0 Grid Tilt 0 Meter Type Horizontal Illuminance (Fc) Average 0.92 Maximum 3.3 Minimum 0.3 Avg/Min 3.07 Max/Min 11.00 RD - SR99 (south leg) Project: Progressive Polygon Coordinates in Feet Point Spacing L-R 5 Point Spacing T-B 5 Grid Orient 0 Grid Tilt 0 Meter Type Horizontal Excellence in Illumination Engineering Software since 1984 www,agi32.com tonip4e Cme iep"f W.6 LV-1kv2H.Yrii.IM 5 AGi32 - Copyright 1999-2011 by Lighting Analysts, Inc. 10/9/2013 Job File: Illumination Layout —Federal Way Progressive.AGI Calculations based on published IES Methods and recommendations, values rounded for display purposes.. Results derived from content of manufacturers photometric file. Excellence in Illumination Engineering Software i '-AGsince 1984 tina software www.agi32.com by Lighting Analysts .onye tnrnrr. caarRx* ma6 t.+�+r+v N,ogw, Inc Calculation Summary - Cont. Illuminance (Fc) Average 1.87 Maximum 3.8 Minimum 0.6 Avg/Min 3.12 Max/Min 6.33 AGi32 - Copyright 1999-2011 by Lighting Analysts, Inc. 10/9/2013 Job File: Illumination Layout_Federal Way Progressive.AGI Calculations based on published IES Methods and recommendations, values rounded for display purposes. Results derived from content of manufacturers photometric file. 7/, I I (S MiH � ■ 6gyS W w D 4r. 2 LL N j UI� rtranSPOGROUP WHAT TRANSPORTATION CAN BE. SIGNAL CALCULATIONS & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Federal Way Progressive S 34O`n St Intersection 1010912013 RESUBMITTED OCT 30 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Transpo Group 11730 118th Avenue N.E., Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034 425-821-3665 Fax: 425-825-8434 �a W cq wtD O01rM�Nccqq NifJmAOl �+i01 •� 1 010�p 04ttli0 i1010 0 pppp O 10 b O tG�p OC 1p 1p OOOOO fG 10N �D O 10 t0 OO f0 O OOQ N[3oo oe�000•oo od0000dooco J aW C O r`1 t tD o t� 1. o Ir t�t0 .-o R:'ID im 'o 'No tO S o'o S118 �o t0 t0 oDio00 Soq t0 IO'IO o'D w o to to 00'0000o of (D(Om mm o'0000.o,doo•o�d000d00000d'd000'0000d N 0 4 0 0 0 io 'o olo O Q o o o v o o o o o a o 0 0 0 o Q o o a J_ ;a o Q # t:n 6O660gR0"o 4p'o O GQ OOp•D O o 0000440 o O oI D Id �✓i - M o o m a O D Q.o 0 0 0 g o o p •o o O g O o p o 0 o o 0 0 0 o 1D td {� Otl tl'D o OQiD o op0 000'0 OpG000040 oap o 0 ID o TM-)Op4•D IM _ OO[7 'a o a004 opPOOQ O o44a00000 0 JD G1a a-o O coo 0ooa OOQ0040 o OC G•D a 6 op O �o a w U iN o 0 O Q 'b 0 0 4 i0 o O P P a b [3 0 O p o 0 0 0 0 ID o o o+p O m lo O o o0'o o OOG G o oQOOO'D o OC OOOpp6 boO'Q � 10 N iN UD V Q � piD o 6tl•b Oq'D o btlb O oQ 4'D O O o0 OGOp'OOOp h N ' o o 0 6 0 rd 0 0 0 g 4 0 0 0 5-o o Q O o P a 0 0 0 p o G o o a in 'O N 'o v o 6 o a o O O O o o o o 0 0 6 O O o aid O o 4 O io o D 0 m "o iN b � p o " am �Q la ~Iw ❑'z m;O mroocnm N tJ mo BOO r o�cyO o 0�nl omv O N t0 oo 'tp a-N o o,000 000�Oo oo Ord o:oOoo�o o0000�00000 oodOoO'00000 0000'o 'o 0"000 o o 00 oo 7 w Um 006 G GQo o 0 o o 000�OQ'O o 00aG D 6QQ4 0 O N O >A O NN0 �O[V iD O r rey iD o OQ'D06'0 o DQpo o o 00c o U m o 6 0 o o Q 4 0 0 op p D O Q 0 0 4 p o o P o Q 0 0 0 o v o O N O III N � Q •O O o p v 0 0 0 � Q g O P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 4 •D o 0 0 0I4 O U olo O60Q0'D ll o o O o+J o OooOo'Do0QQ'000000 � o U m W QmO mo- VI OQ'O o oC o 06QD 004a a G Eon m o m � 4 G 0 0 4 0 e- O N 4 70 O o 0 0 0 inp O 0 a O Q o 0 o 0 0 .y l� O p mryo Or-m0� �vo4"Oo 0 op o oo00Q 0000 a W o ryo J to N I� N Ntn f Div o i= SM1E 3AE o o(6en d m1. j to•S N•msi [Nv1 mm A uldoOo ;r r nScdn �eO li LL M pm t�NN tOmG O f(eU oOd id Ci ca o td Q 1R O1 • � (4 ei N tq ed U Q H O w O w o O a Q aI$ O O o. O O o 0 0 0 p P O 0 0 0 Q o 0 0 F Ro U Ly] U U U U U g w o y�Cy1E ``N N w m w W N W W Il! W W W W W lel W W W W W W W W W WIuy1 W W W W W W W W 552Z wx wzzzzzzzzzlzzz zzzzzxzzzzzzxz -- Fm0 o �Y - z ifl W O . m � ix N � i+i •c to m I� cC as ro atl m d �N d 00 a` m z 3 3" � N N � W Fz m W 7 Z {ay m S d a O N d 0 N V '-1 a x w z z z z 0 v u rr-D m rn of m aa) ti U N ry m N N Y i � L m x n m GO 00 Ci C N ry N N C 7 O m 1- 0 O 00 x rl O l7 U Q 0 rn p O1 N + m m 2 N N n O O Z 0 m 7 N V x U c in C N Ln 00 ei " Lr? 00 � N � ko a N m N t SO 0) 2 N tlD ul O C 00 C N N o O 2 L U a 0 rn c m p n o 2 N N rl N n O W W C Z O .0 Y m u 2 M m U C m to L 00 w O IL M kO V 1-I o m z ° a Imp E N N N _ ° m u C i 00 ._ In 0 W L9 z z z D 0 i W H 18 LQ li w u lD N O rl cl 01 01 00 00 P ae-I c-I ei s-1 c-1 U II II II II II N N N N N N L OD = o In w o In m O IA N u1 lD S N eq rl O 01 C N N N N �A 7 O 2 ei N O to I, %D Vl M O * 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 rn m M w 00 O N 0 Il ei rn 00 n + N N -I O m 2 N N N N 'i m-1 Ln a ii l0 Lo c O c z O N m N u = m to U c 00 IA rvanspoGROUP BREAKER SIZING PROJECT NAME: Federal Way Progressive JOB NUMBER: 12152 PREPARED BY: BMK 10/09/13 Breaker Sizing -Main Breaker Load Circuit 240V Illum 1 240V Illum 2 120V Signal 120V Outlet 120V Heat Strip 120V Photo Cell Main Breaker 47.113 x 1.33 (Future Capacity) _ Traffic Signal Circuit_ LLF = 125% Controller = 300W 16 Signal Heads (3-Section) 400W 2 Signal Heads (4-Section) 100W 6 Ped Heads = 90W 3 Video Detection 75W 2 GFI's 1800 W (965 x 1.25) + 1800 120V Illumination Circuit 1 400W HPS Luminaires 6 (6 x 400W) x 1.4 240 Illumination Circuit 2 150W HPS Luminaires 2 2x150Wx1.4 240 Non -Continuous Continuous Factor 14 140% 1.75 140% 15A 8.04166666666667A 125% 15A 0.83A 125% .009A 125% 62.66073334 Use 100A Main Breaker 25.05 A 25.OSA is less than SOA. Use 50A branch breaker. = 14.00 A 14.00A is less than 20A. Use 20A breaker. Use 30A Contactor 1.75 A 1.75A is less than 20A . Use 20A breaker. Use 30A Contactor Leg A Leg B 19.6 19.6 2.45 2.45 25.05208 20 1.0375 0.01125 43.0875 47.11333 1, Wetlalfd Delineation / Mitigation / Restoration / Habitat Creation / Permit Assistance 9505 19th Avenue S.E. Suite 106 Everett, Washington 98208 (425) 337-3174 Fax (425) 337-3045 CRITICAL AREA STUDY Zaremba-Pro ressive Insurance FEDERAL WAY, WA Revision #1 Wetland Resources, Inc. Project # 13016 Prepared By: Wetland Resources, Inc. 9505 19th Ave. SE, Suite 106 Everett, WA 98208 (425) 337-3174 Prepared For: Zaremba Group LLC Attn: Sean McDermott 14600 Detroit Avenue, # 1500 Lakewood, OH 44122 First Submittal: May 20, 2013 Revision # 1 September 17, 2013 APPROVED PLANNING Cite of Federal Way D(-,--1, of Corr, 'ly n P ;. 1 0 . � • 6 ��• TABLE OF CONTENTS SITE DESCRIPTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION IMPACTS AND MITIGATION WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLANTING PLAN REVIEW OF EXISTING INFORMATION WETLAND AND STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS - COWARDIN SYSTEM WETLAND AND STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS - CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WETLAND DETERMINATION REPORT BOUNDARY DETERMINATION FINDINGS WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES ASSESSMENT WILDLIFE GRASS SEEDING PLANTING NOTES PROJECT MONITORING PROGRAM PERFORMANCE BONDING USE OF THIS REPORT REFERENCES CRITICAL AREA STUDY MAP APPENDIX A -FIELD DATA l 1 2 3 5 5 6 6 7 8 9 11 12 12 13 14 15 16 SHEET 1 / 1 SITE DESCRIPTION Wetland Resources, Inc. conducted a site investigation on October 2, 2012 within an 8.28-acre parcel located at 34001 Pacific Highway S in Federal Way, Washington. The tax identification number for the parcel 2021049051, and will herein be referred to as the "subject property." The purpose of the investigation was to identify and delineate jurisdictional wetland and stream boundaries on and in the vicinity of the subject property, and to collect sufficient data to prepare this critical area study. The site is further located as a portion of Section 20, Township 21N, Range 04E, WM. The subject property is accessed from the east via the Pacific Highway. The property and surrounding areas are zoned Commercial Enterprise, and land use consists of light industrial to the south and west, forested upland to the north, and the Pacific Highway to the east. No structures are located on the subject property. The eastern portion of the property has been maintained since at least 1936, based on King County iMap historical aerial imagery. Figure 1 Aerial Overview of Subject Property The subject property is located within the Puyallup River watershed and the Hylebos Creek drainage basin. Vegetation within the entire eastern half of the subject property consists of maintained pasture grass, which overlays a level grade. From east to west, the -maintained area transitions down a west aspect 3 to 1 slope to an access road. The access road surrounds a regional stormwater retention pond, stream, and wetland complex in the western half of the Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 1 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 property. Vegetation within the western half of the property consists of the following observed species: Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), western red cedar (Thuja plicata), red alder (Alnus rubra), black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera), Pacific willow (Salix lucida), Pacific ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus), Douglas hawthorn (Crataegus douglasiz), Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana), snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), Pacific dogwood (Cornus sericea), ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), Pacific rhododendron (Rhododendron macrophyllum), cut -leaf blackberry (Rubus laciniatus), sword fern (Polystichum munitum), slough sedge (Carex obnupta), common rush (7uncus usus), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), and reed canarygrass (Phalan' arundinacea). The subject property contains a stream, lake, and wetland complex. The stream is considered a major stream, pursuant to the definition set forth in the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) section 19.05.130 100. The on -site stream is a tributary to Hylebos Creek, a highly modified watercourse that flows through the most developed areas of Federal Way and eventually outlets to Commencement Bay. The stream is mapped by King County as fish habitat. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife does not map the stream channel. The Washington Department of Natural Resources does not map the stream channel. FWRC 19.165.010(1)(a) states that major streams require 100-foot protective buffers, measured outward from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Where buffers overlap, the more restrictive shall supersede the less restrictive. In this instance, the wetland buffer associated with Wetland A is the most restrictive buffer. The on -site lake is an artificially constructed stormwater pond known as Kitts corner stormwater detention pond; Hylebos Creek was at some point modified to supply hydrology to the pond. Pursuant to FWRC 19.170.020, all regulated lakes in the City of Federal Way require a 25-foot setback from the OHWM. The on -site wetland is located in the historic Hylebos creek stream channel (identified using historic aerial imagery provided by King County iMap), and is herein referred to as Wetland A. Wetland A is a regulated wetland based upon the definition of a wetland and the size thresholds outlined in FWRC 19.175.020. Wetlands within the city limits of Federal Way require classification and buffers based on FWRC 19.175.020(2). Wetland A is classified as a Category II wetland. In the City of Federal Way, Category II wetlands typically receive 100-foot protective buffers. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes to construct a 16,973 square foot office building, stormwater treatment/conveyance, parking to accommodate 115 new stalls, road construction, and landscaping. Utility connections require wetland buffer impacts; for the placement of stormwater conveyance/outfall, and also to connect sewer with existing infrastructure. Impacts and mitigation are discussed in greater detail in the following section, titled Impacts and Mitigation. Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 2 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION Stormwater will be conveyed to the west, towards Wetland A. The outfall represents a 44 square foot permanent buffer impact, which is located several feet outside of the wetland. Installation of the conveyance and outfall will require temporary wetland buffer impacts totaling 1,648 square feet. All other impacts associated with the stormwater plan occur entirely outside of critical area buffers. Within the boundaries of the 20-foot stormwater easement, from the wetland buffer east to the maintenance road, vegetation consists of maintained grasses (1,186 square feet). Mitigation will be accomplished by in -kind restoration (grass seeding 1,186 sf within the disturbance area), using an approved buffer grass seed mix. Seed specifications are found below in the section titled Grass Seeding. The maintenance road represents 150 square feet of the buffer impact area. Any disturbance to asphalt will be restored in -kind. From the west edge of the maintenance road to the west edge of the stormwater easement, native scrub -shrub vegetation is the dominant community. Construction of the conveyance and outfall will require vegetation disturbance for 7.5 feet on all sides of the proposed line. Total disturbance within the scrub -shrub area is then equal to 312 square feet (268 sf temporary impact, 44 sf permanent impact for placement of the outfall). To mitigate for impacts to wetland buffer scrub -shrub vegetation, the applicant proposes buffer enhancement within the entire portion of the easement to the west of the maintenance road. The enhancement area totals 624 square feet. This represents a 2 to I ratio of mitigation to impacts. This ratio is expected to adequately compensate for losses to function and value resulting from placement of the stormwater pipe, as well as temporal losses. Connecting sanitary sewer with existing infrastructure requires temporary wetland buffer impacts totaling 1,082 square feet. Impacts consist of grass removal and compaction, for the purpose of burying the sewer line. All other impacts associated with the sewer plan occur outside of all critical area buffers. Sanitary sewer will be routed west from the proposed building via a 6-inch pipe, and will connect to existing sewer infrastructure, located beneath the gravel maintenance road that runs immediately to the east of the regional stormwater facility. Sewer installation will result in temporary buffer impacts within the 3 to 1 slope that breaks west down to the aforementioned maintenance road. Vegetation within the impact area consists of maintained grasses. It is assumed that the impact area is regularly maintained by the City of Federal Way, given the uniformity of vegetation height throughout the slope area, and the proximity to the gravel access road for the regional stormwater facility. Given that buffer impacts related to sewer installation are temporary, and occur within a regularly maintained area, the applicant proposes to restore all impacts associated with the sewer line with grass seed. No further mitigation is proposed. Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 3 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 IMPACT IMPACT TYPE IMPACTED GROUND COVER MITIGATION RATIO SEWER LINE 1,082 SF TEMP. GRASS SEED MIX 1:1 (1,082 SF TOTAL BUFFER IMPACT GRASS 1,082 SF IMPACT AREA) STORMWATER 268 SF TEMP. SCRUB -SHRUB LINE (1,648 SF BUFFER IMPACT BUFFER TOTAL IMPACT ENHANCEMENT 2:1 44 SF PERM. AREA) BUFFER IMPACT SCRUB -SHRUB 624 SF (BIRDCAGE BARRIER) 150 SF TEMP. REPAIR ASPHALT BUFFER IMPACT ASPHALT 150SF 1:1 (OVER EX. ROAD) 1,186 SF TEMP. GRASS GRASS SEED MIX 1:1 BUFFER IMPACT 1,186 SF Table 1: Impacts and Mitigation Table Modification Criteria FWRC 19.175.040 sets specific requirements for proposals that include structures and land surface modification within regulated wetland buffers. Specifically, FWRC 19.175.040(6)(a)-(e) requires applicants to describe how impacts affect wetland functions and values. The following discussion is intended to address the modification criteria found in FWRC 19.175.040(6)(a)-(e). Code citation is presented (italicized and indented), and is immediately followed by the applicant's response. (a) It will not adversely affect water quality; Response: Stormwater will be collected in a detention vault, where contaminants will settle out of the water column prior to being released from the outfall structure. Therefore it is expected that this proposal will not adversely affect water quality. (b) It will not adversely affect the existing quality of the wetland's or buffer's wildl fe habitat; Response: The outfall releases into Wetland A, which is part of a regional stormwater detention facility. The wetland complex is subject to daily human use, and is adjacent to a maintenance road. The vicinity of the proposed outfall represents low value wildlife habitat. Temporary impacts associated with construction will likely deter use of the site by wildlife. However, this project is not expected to permanently affect the existing quality of the wetland's or buffer's wildlife habitat. Therefore this proposal will not adversely affect the existing quality of wildlife habitat within the wetland or buffer. (c) It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities; Response: The outfall contributes flows to Wetland A. Wetland A is part of the Kitts Corner Regional Stormwater Facility. This area was constructed to provide stormwater floodstorage. The additional input of stormwater will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 4 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRi# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 capabilities. (d) It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards; and Response: The applicant proposes a buffer enhancement plan that includes densely planting ground stabilizing plants on the downstream side of the outfall. The applicant also proposes to place a rip rap collar around the overflow structure. These measures will increase soil and slope stability, and will minimize erosion. This project will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards. (e) It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the city as a whole, including the loss of open space. Response: The proposal will not do harm to any other property in the area, nor the city as a whole. This project will cause the loss of 44 square feet of open space within the wetland buffer surrounding Wetland A. This represents a trivial, discountable loss of open space. WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLANTING PLAN The current stormwater design requires wetland buffer impacts, to areas consisting of scrub -shrub vegetation. To replace lost functions associated with vegetation removal, the applicant proposes to plant the vegetated portion of the easement with native trees and shrubs. The wetland buffer enhancement area totals 624 square feet. Within the enhancement area, all species will be installed on 6-foot centers. A total of 18 trees and 39 shrubs will be installed. Buffer Enhancement Planting Plan (624 SF) Common Name Latin Name Size S acin Quantity Pacific willow Salix lucida whip 6' 9 Red osier dogwood Cornus alba whip 6' 9 Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus 1 gal 6' 13 Black twinberry Lonicera inaolucrata 1 gal 67 13 snowberry Symphoricarpos albus 1 gal 6' 13 All whips identified in the Buffer Enhancement Planting Plan shall be planted downstream (to the west) of the outfall structure. Snowberry (Sympharicarpos albus) shall be planted upslope from the outfall structure (to the east of the outfall). See Buffer Enhancement Planting Plan (inset within the Critical Area Study Map). REVIEW OF EXISTING INFORMATION Before conducting the on -site investigation, a literature review was performed to identify records of wetlands and streams within the project area. The following information was examined: • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map, Poverty Bay quadrangle (USGS, 2011) • National Wetlands Inventory map of project area - online version located at: http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/mapper.htn-il) • Web Soil Survey (USDA) located at: http://www.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pnw�-soil/wa—reports.htn-A • Federal Way Revised Code Division V. Critical Areas, FWRC section 19.142-19.185 • King County iMap, website located at: Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 5 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 ht :/Iwww.kin coon ov/o erations/GIS/Ma sIiMAP.as x NRCS Hydric Soils National List, website located at: http://soils_usda.gov/uselhydric/ United States Army Corps of Engineers 2013 National Wetland Plant List Available online at: http://rsgislas.crrel.usace.army.n l/NWPL/ WDFW Priority Habitats and Species Maps — online version located at: http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/ WETLAND CLASSIFICATION - COWARDIN SYSTEM FWRC 19.175.010(2)(d) requires that wetlands be classified based on the Cowardin System, as described in Classification of Wetlands and Dee water Habitats of the United States. The classification for the subject wetland is: Wetland A: Palustrine, Forested Wetland, Broad -Leaved Deciduous, Seasonally Flooded/Saturated WETLAND CLASSIFICATION — CITY OF ftDERAL WAY The City of Federal Way requires that wetlands be identified based on FWRC 19-175.020. Taken from FWRC 19.175.020: (1) regulated wetlands are classified bao the following categories: (a) Category I wetlands meet one of the -following criteria: r) Contain the Presence of species or documented habitat recognized by state or federal agencies as endangered threatened or potentially extirpated plant, fish or animal species; or (ii) Contain the presence of plant associations of infrequent occur7ence, irreplaceable ecological functions, or exceptional local sign fcance including but not h7nited to estuarine sysiems, peal bogs and fens, mature forested wetlands, groundwater exchange areas, *f1want habitat or unique educational sites; or (iii) Have three or more wetland classes, one of which is open water. (b) Category Il wetlands are greater than 2,500 square feet in area, do not exhibit the characteristics of Category I wetirtnds, and meet one oflhefollowing criteria- (i) Are contiguous with water bodies or tributaries to water bodies which under normal circumstances contain or support a fish populatio?; including streams there fl w is intermittent; or (ii) Are greater than one acre in size in its entirety; or (iii) Are less titan or equal to one acre in size in its entirety and have two or more wetland classes, with neither class dominated by nonnative invasive species. Wetland A - Category II: Wetland A does not meet criteria for designation as a Category I wetland based on FWRC I9.I75.020(I)(a)(i-iii). Wetland A meets criteria for designation as a Category U wetland based on FWRC 19. I 75.020()}( } I ii ; the wetland is greater than one acre in size in its entirety. Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 6 Zaremba-Progressive Insurance Wetland Resources, Inc. Revision #1 WRI# 13016 September 17, 2013 WETLAND DETERMINATION REPORT _Methodology The routine methodology described in the current adopted manual, the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region, Version 2.0 (2010 Regional Supplement) was used to make a determination on this site. Under this method, the process for making a wetland determination is based on three sequential steps: was used to make this wetland and boundary determination, as required by the City of Federal Way. Under this method, the process for making a wetland determination is based on three sequential steps: 1.) Examination of the site for hydrophytic vegetation (species present and percent cover); 2.) If hydrophytic vegetation is found, the presence of hydric soils is then determined; 3.) The final step is to determine the presence of wetland hydrology in the area examined under the first two steps. The following criteria descriptions were used in the boundary determination: Vegetation Criteria The 2010 Regional Supplement defines hydrophytic vegetation as "assemblage of macrophytes that occurs in areas where inundation or soil saturation is either permanent or of sufficient frequency and duration to influence plant occurrence." Field indicators were used to determine whether the vegetation meets the definition for hydrophytic vegetation. Soils Criteria and MgWed Descri tioxi The 2010 Regional Supplement defines hydric soils as "soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part." Field indicators were used to determine whether a given soil meets the definition for hydric soils. The soils underlying this site are mapped in the Soil Survey of King County Area Washington, 1973 edition as Everett-Alderwood gravelly sandy loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes (EwC). Everett gravelly sandy loam is described as very deep, somewhat excessively drained soil on terraces and outwash plains. It formed in glacial outwash. Typically, the surface layer, where mixed to a depth of about 6 inches, is dark brown gravelly sandy loam. The subsoil is dark brown very gravelly sandy loam about 12 inches thick. Included in this unit are small areas of Alderwood soils on till plains, Indianola soils on terraces and outwash plains, and Ragnar soils on outwash plains. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability of this Everett soil is rapid. Available water capacity is low. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam is made up of moderately well drained soils that have a weakly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. In a representative profile, the surface Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 7 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 layer and subsoil are very dark brown, dark brown, and grayish brown gravelly sandy loam about 27 inches thick. The substratum is grayish -brown, weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till that extends to a depth of 60 inches and more. Soils included with this soil mapping make up no more than 30 percent of the total acreage. Some areas are up to 25 percent Everett soils that have slopes of 15 to 30 percent, and some areas are up to 2 percent Bellingham, Norma, and Seattle soils, which are found in depressions. Runoff is moderate, and the erosion hazard is severe. Hydrola_gy Criteria Wetland hydrology encompasses all hydrologic characteristics of areas that are periodically inundated or have soils saturated to the surface for a sufficient duration during the growing season. Areas with evident characteristics of wetland hydrology are those where the presence of water has an overriding influence on characteristics of vegetation and soils due to anaerobic and chemically reducing conditions, respectively. BOUNDARY DETERMINATION FINDINGS Figures 2 and 3: Looking along the east edge of Wetland A Wetland A Vegetation within Wetland A is characterized by the presence of the following species: red alder (Alnus rubra, FAC), black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera, FAC), Pacific willow (Salix lucida, FACW), red osier dogwood (Corpus sericea, FACW), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FAC), common rush (7uncus effusus, FACW), reed canarygrass (Phalwis arundinacea, FACW), slough sedge (Carex obnupta, OBL), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC), sword fern (Polystichum munitum, FACU), and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus, FACU). The vegetation community within wetland A meets criteria for designation as wetland vegetation (Facultative or wetter community). When compared with Munsell color charts, typical soils within wetland A are very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) with a texture of gravelly sandy loam from 0 to 18+ inches below the surface. Mottles were present, and soils were moist during the 2/ 13 site visit. Soils within wetland A met the hydric soil indicator F6-Redox Dark Surface. Soils within wetland A are considered hydric. Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 8 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 The dominance of species rated "Facultative" or wetter meets the criteria for hydrophytic vegetation in the areas mapped as wetland. Based on field indicators of hydric soils, it appears that the areas mapped as wetland are saturated to the surface for more than 12.5 percent of the growing season, thereby fulfilling wetland soils and wetland hydrology criteria. Wetland A meets all criteria for designation as a wetland. Non -Wetland The majority of the area mapped as non -wetland is maintained pasture grass and Scot's broom. Soils samples adjacent to the wetland boundary on the upland were consistently dark brown (10YR3/3), moist, and with a texture of gravelly sandy loam. The following vegetation was observed adjacent to the wetland boundary on the upland side: black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera, FAC), western red cedar (Thuja plicata, FAC), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC), sword fern (Polystichum munitum, FACU), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii, FACU), red elderberry (Sambucus Racemosa, FACU), Pacific rhododendron (Rhododendron macrophyllum, NOL) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus, FACU). Vegetation within the area mapped as non - wetland does not meet criteria for designation as wetland vegetation (Facultative or wetter). Based on the lack of field indicators, areas mapped as non -wetland are dry to the surface for more than 12.5 percent of the growing season, thereby not fulfilling wetland hydrology criteria. The area mapped as non -wetland does not meet criteria for designation as a wetland. WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES ASSESSMENT FWRC 19.175.010(2)(g) requires that applicants provide "an evaluation and assessment of the existing or potential functions and values of the wetland based on the following factors: surface water control; wildlife habitat; pollution and erosion control; groundwater exchange; open space and recreation; and educational and cultural opportunities. This section is intended to compare the current and post -development functions and values provided by wetland A and the associated buffer. Methodolo The methodology for this functions and values assessment is based on professional opinion developed through past field analyses and interpretation. This assessment pertains specifically to the on -site wetland and stream system, but is typical for assessments of similar systems common to Western Washington. Functional Components Wetlands in Western Washington perform a variety of ecosystem functions. Included among the most important functions provided by wetlands are surfacewater control, wildlife habitat, pollution and erosion control (water quality improvement, groundwater exchange, recreational opportunities and education. The most commonly assessed functions and their descriptions are listed below. Assessments of these functions for the project site are provided in the "Analysis" section of this report. Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 9 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 Septe►nber 17, 2013 I Hydrologic Functions Wetlands often function as natural water storage areas during periods of precipitation and flooding. By storing water that otherwise might be channeled into open flow systems, wetlands can attenuate or modify potentially damaging effects of storm events, reducing erosion and peak flows to downstream systems. Additionally, the soils underlying wetlands are often less permeable, providing long-term storage of stormwater or floodflow and controlling baseflows of downstream systems. Stormwater storage capacity and floodflow attenuation are generally a function of the size of the wetland and their topographic characteristics. Water Quality Surface water quality improvement is another evaluated function. Surface runoff during periods of precipitation increases the potential for sediments and pollutants to enter surface water. Wetlands improve water quality by acting as filters as water passes through them, trapping sediments and pollutants from surface water. Ponded areas within depressional wetlands also allow sediments to drop out of suspension, thereby increasing water quality. As development increases, the potential for polluted water to reach wetlands and streams also increases. Unnaturally high inputs of pollutants, which are often found in urbanized areas, along with the size of the wetlands and the vegetation structure within them are the main limiting factors of this function. lildlfe Habitat Wetlands have potential to provide diverse habitat for aquatic, terrestrial, and avian species for nesting, rearing, resting, cover, and foraging. Wildlife species are commonly dependent upon a variety of intermingled habitat types, including wetlands, adjacent uplands, large bodies of water, and movement corridors between them. Human intrusion, including development within and adjacent to wetlands, and impacts to movement corridors are the most limiting factors for wildlife habitat functions. Value Assessment: Wetland A Hydrologic Function (surface water control) Wetland A has moderate potential to perform a hydrologic control function. The size of the contributing basin relative to the wetland area is small enough that it does perform a significant flood storage function. The adjacent open water is also indicative of the potential to perform this function. Given that flows exiting Wetland A travel through a highly urbanized watershed, Wetland A also has the opportunity to perform a valuable hydrologic control function. Therefore, wetland A is of moderate value in terms of hydrologic control. Water Quality (pollution and erosion control, groundwater exchange) Wetland A has a low to moderate potential to perform a valuable water quality function. The wetland has an unconstricted outlet, which decreases residence time for incoming waters, and persistent ungrazed vegetation is only present on the fringe of the wetland. Potential is increased given that there is a substantial area of seasonal ponding within Wetland A. Overall, Wetland A is of low to moderate value for the water quality improvement function it performs. Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 10 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 Wildlife Habitat Wetland A has moderate potential to perform a wildlife habitat function. The presence of multiple hydroperiods and vegetation classes, moderate plant species diversity, and the lack of dominating invasive species within the wetland create this potential. The value of the wetland is further improved by the complexity of habitat interspersion, and the corridor and connection to other habitat types. The physical size of the buffer is somewhat conducive to wildlife use, and the proximity to other wetlands and habitat types is important to the life requirements of various birds, mammals, amphibian and invertebrates. Wetland A is of moderate value for the wildlife habitat function it performs. Open space, Recreation, and Educational Opportunities Wetland A is easily accessible via an access road recorded on a public access easement. There are currently various educational signs within the subject property. The wetland is of moderate to high value in terms of educational opportunities. The majority of the on -site portion of Wetland A is ponded. Therefore, it is of low value for recreation and open space. The buffer surrounding Wetland A is of greater value, and is easily accessed. Past-Deveig went Functions and Values The development of the subject property does not require any permanent impacts to wetlands, lakes, streams, or their associated buffers. The footprint of the proposed structure is to be placed over land that has been maintained for at least 65 years. Stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces will be detained outside of critical area buffers. Temporary impacts to regularly maintained grassy areas will be replaced in -kind. Therefore, it is expected that no net loss of critical area functions or values will result from the proposed development of the subject property. WILDLIFE Wetlands often contain resources such as food, water, thermal cover and hiding cover in close proximity, which wildlife species need to thrive. Likely bird and small mammals are utilizing the site but not residing there. The following are typical avian species that may utilize this habitat: American crow (Corpus brachyrhynchos), American robin (Turdus migratorius), black -capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus), bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), common raven (Corpus corax), dark -eyed junco (junco hyemalis), European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), rufous -sided towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), song sparrow (Melospiza melodic), steller's jay (Cyanocitta stelleri), and winter wren (Troglodytes troglodytes). Mammalian species that may utilize this site include bats (Myotis spp.), black -tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus), coyotes (Canis latrans), deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus), moles (Scapanus spp.), raccoons (Procyon lotor), shrews (Sorex spp.), skunks (Mephitis spp.), squirrels (Sciuris griseus, Tamiasciurus douglasiz), and Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana). These lists are not intended to be all-inclusive, and may omit some bird, mammal or amphibian species that utilize the site. Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 11 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision 41 September 17, 2013 GRASS SEEDING Disturbed soil within the wetland buffer shall be seeded to the recommended grass seed mixtures below, or similar approved mixtures. Fertilizer shall only be used if absolutes necessary due to potential runoff into adjacent waters. If deemed absolutely necessary by the consulting biologist and/or the County biologist an appropriate fertilizer will be recommended for the particular situation. Buffer Mix Common Name tall fescue colonial bentgrass annual ryegrass white clover Latin Name Festuca arundinacea Agrostis tenuis Lolium multforum Trifolium repens PLANTING NOTES lbs./1,000 sf 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 Wetland buffer mitigation projects are typically more complex to install than can be described in plans. Careful monitoring by a professional wetland scientist for all portions of this project is strongly recommended. Timing and sequencing is important to the success of this type of project. Planting should occur in the early spring or late fall. Plants should be ordered from a reputable nursery. Care and handling of plant materials is extremely important to the overall success of the project. All plant materials recommended in this plan should be available from local and regional sources, depending on seasonal demand. Some limited species substitution may be allowed, only with the agreement of the consulting wetland professional. The plants shall be arranged with the appropriate numbers, sizes, species, and distribution to achieve the required vegetation coverage. The actual placement of individual plants shall mimic natural, asymmetric vegetation patterns found on similar undisturbed sites in the area. Colored surveyors ribbon or another approved marking device shall be placed next to each planted tree and shrub to assist in locating the plants while removing the competing non-native vegetation and to assist in monitoring the plantings. Wood chips or other suitable material shall be used for mulching in the planting areas. Any existing vegetation is to be removed from a two -foot diameter area at each planting site. Mulch is to be placed in this two -foot diameter area at a depth of three to four inches. A four -inch diameter ring around the base of each plant shall be kept free of mulch. Arborist woodchips are the preferred material for mulch. These can be stockpiled during site clearing or imported. Care should be taken when selecting planting locations for trees and shrubs within the wetland area. Please see Critical Area Study map for planting information. Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 12 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 PROJECT MONITORING PROGRAM Requirements for monitoring project: 1. Initial compliance report 2. Semi-annual site inspection (twice yearly in the spring and fall) for five years 3. Annual reports (One report submitted in the fall of each monitored year) ppTpase of Monitorin The purpose of monitoring this mitigation project is to evaluate the success of the mitigation plantings. Success will be determined if monitoring shows that at the end of five years the stated goals are being met and that habitat values in the mitigation areas are equivalent to similar ecosystems in the immediate area. The property owner shall grant access to the site for inspection and maintenance to the contracted wetland specialist and to the City of Federal Way during the period of the bond or until the project is evaluated as successful. Inspection Schedule Upon completion of the wetland and buffer mitigation project, an inspection will be conducted by a qualified professional selected and retained by the city. The professional will review the wetland mitigation report and other relevant information, conduct periodic inspections, and issue a written report to the director of community development. Performance Standards The wetland and buffer mitigation areas shall support at least 80 percent survivorship of the native plants set forth in this plan, including natural regeneration, by the end of five years. To be deemed successful, invasive species shall represent less than 10 percent of the total planting area. Maintenance This mitigation project will require periodic maintenance to replace mortality of the planted species. Maintenance is also necessary to control invasive, non-native plant species and competing grasses. The planting areas will be maintained in spring and fall of each year for the five-year monitoring period. Maintenance will include the removal of competing grasses and non-native vegetation from a two -foot diameter ring surrounding a given plant stem. Removal of invasive species should be done by hand to decrease the likelihood of damage occurring to the plantings. All blackberry, reed canarygrass, and other aggressive invasive species sprouting anywhere within the mitigation area should be removed at each maintenance period. Supplemental water is recommended from June through September and during any other periods of drought. Following each monitoring visit, recommendations will be made for the replacement of plant mortality. Any replanting should be done during the fall maintenance visit. At each maintenance visit, mulch shall be replaced around each plant. Each plant shall receive a two -foot diameter ring of mulch to a height of three to four inches above the existing soil surface. A four -inch diameter ring around the base of each plant shall be kept free of mulch. Wood chips or composted mulch is acceptable. Chemical control of invasive, non-native species is not a preferred method of maintenance and shall not be used for this project. Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 13 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 Contingency Plan If more than 20% of the plants are severely stressed during any of the inspections, or it appears more than 20% may not survive, additional plantings of the same species or, if necessary, alternative species may be added to the planting area. If this situation persists into the next inspection, a meeting with a representative for the City of Federal Way, the consulting wetland specialist and the property owner will be scheduled to decide upon contingency plans. Elements of the contingency plan may include, but will not be limited to more aggressive weed control, plant mortality replacement, species substitution, fertilization, soil amendments and/or irrigation. PERFORMANCE BONDING Pursuant to requirements set forth in FWRC 19.175.030(5)(vii), a performance and maintenance bond in the amount of 120 percent of the costs of implementing the mitigation plan shall be provided to the City of Federal Way for the period of five years from the completion of the project. The surety shall represent 120% of the estimated cost of the mitigation activity including clearing, grading, plant materials, plant installation, irrigation, weed management, monitoring, and other costs. Annual monitoring reports and seasonal maintenance will be required to assure the success of the wetland and buffer mitigation plan. The City of Federal Way shall release this bond at the end of five years, only upon successful determination for all portions of this mitigation project. The following is an estimate of plant materials, labor, monitoring, and maintenance. This does not represent a bid to install: Estimated cost of clearing and grading (N/A) Total estimated cost of monitoring and maintenance $3,500.00 Total number of 1 gallon plants ($10.50/plant) $409.50 (39) Total number of whips (83.5/Plant) $63.00 (18) Total estimated Cost of Plant, Materials and Labor $3,972.50 Total Bond Amount (120% Total Estimated Cost) $4,767.00 Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 14 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 USE OF THIS REPORT This Critical Area Study and Wetland Mitigation Plan is supplied to Zaremba Group, LLC as a means of determining on -site critical area conditions, as required by the City of Federal Way during the permitting process. This report is based largely on readily observable conditions and, to a lesser extent, on readily ascertainable conditions. No attempt has been made to determine hidden or concealed conditions. The laws applicable to critical areas are subject to varying interpretations and may be changed at any time by the courts or legislative bodies. This report is intended to provide information deemed relevant in the applicant's attempt to comply with the laws now in effect. The work for this report has conformed to the standard of cares employed by wetland ecologists. No other representation or warranty is made concerning the work or this report and any implied representation or warranty is disclaimed. Wetland Resources, Inc. Niels Pedersen Associate Ecologist Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 15 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revlslon #1 September 17, 2013 REFERENCES Cowardin, et al., 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Dee water Habitats of the United States. U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-79/31. December 1979. Environmental Laboratory. (1987). Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands, Northwest Region. 1996. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C. Sheldon, et al., 2005. Wetlands in W d-dngton State -Volume 1: A Synthesis of the Science. Washington State Department of Ecology. Publication #05-06-006. Olympia, WA. Federal Way Revised Code, Division V. Critical Areas (19.142-19.185). Federal Way, Washington. December 2012. Lichvar, R.W. 2013. The National Wetland Plant List: 2013 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2013- 49: 1-241. Soil Survey of Ki!jg CounV Area Washin on. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. July 1983. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2010). Re 'onal Supjplement.to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains Valle s and Coast Re 'on ersion 2.0 , ERDC/EL TR-10-3, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Washington State Department of Ecology. Publication #96-94. March 1997. Critical Area Study & Mitigation Plan 16 Wetland Resources, Inc. Zaremba-Progressive Insurance WRI# 13016 Revision #1 September 17, 2013 Appendix A USAGE Wetland Determination Data Forms (WMVC) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Zaremba-34001 Pacific Hwy S City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: 2/12113 Applicant/Owner: Progressive Insurance Claims State: WA Sampling Point: S1 Investigator(s): Scott Brainard, Niels Pedersen Section, Township, Range: 201 21N1 04E, WM Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): >5% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47°17'46.18" N Long: 122- 19' 00.22" W Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Everett-Alderwood gravelly sandy loams 6-15% NWI classification: Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _ _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _ ✓ — No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ ✓ _ No— Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ ✓ _ No _ — within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes — ✓ No Remarks VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. Salix lucida 2 Alnus rubra 40 30 Y FACW Y FAC 3, Populus balsamifera 20 Y FAC 4 Thuja plicata 10 N FAC 100 = Total Cover SaplinolShrub_Stratum (Plot size: ] 1. Cornus sericea 35 Y FACW 2. 3. 4. 5. 35 = Total Cover Hera, Stratum (Plot size: ) 1 Carex obnupta 70 Y OBL 2 juncus effusus 20 Y FACW 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. - 10. 11. 90 = Total Cover Woody Vine trat m (Plot size: } 1. 2. — = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 100% That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total Cover of: Multholy b _ OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (8) Prevalence Index = B/A Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ✓ Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is 53.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix nches Color moist % Redox FeAlklyas Color m ist % Type'Toc Texture Rem Q-18+ 10 YR 3/2 92 1QYR 4/6 8 G M gravelly sandy loam Type! C=Concentration, D=De fetion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ , Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (176) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ✓ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: ✓ Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary,indicators minimum of one required: check all that a I Sep—ondary Indicators or more re uired Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, ✓ High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Surface Water Present? Yes No _ ✓ _ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 4 Saturation Present? Yes No__ Depth (inches): _ Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, Remarks: Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓T No if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Interim Version f� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Zaremba-34001 Pacific Hwy S City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: 2/12/13 Applicant/Owner: Progressive Insurance Claims State: WA Sampling Point: S2 Investigator(s): Scott Brainard, Niels Pedersen Section, Township, Range: 20, 21 N, 04E, WM Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): >5% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47°17'46.18" N Long: 122° 19' 00.22" W Datum: WGS84 Everett-Alderwood ravel) sandy loams 6-15% NWI classification: Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Soil Map Unit Name: gravelly Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology _ —significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes— ✓ _ No Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ _ No _ — Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ _ No _ ✓ within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No ✓__ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Populus balsamifera 60 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Thuja plicata 30 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3_ Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 90 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75% (A/B) Sa lin (Shrub §tratum (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Rubus spectabilis 75 Y FAC 2 Total % Cover of: Multiply by! 3 OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = 4 5 FAC species x 3 = 75 = Total Cover FACQ species x 4 = Hertz Stratum (Plot size: } UPL species x 5 = 1. grass 60 NOL Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: 4 ✓ Dominance Test is >50% 5 Prevalence Index is 53.0' 6 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. _ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 9. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 10. Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 11. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 90 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Rubus armeniacus 20 Y FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation 2. Present? Yes ✓ No 20 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 40 US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator orconflrm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix 'n he Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % 7 oe Loci Texture Remarks 0-18+ 19 YR 3/3 100 gravelly sandy loam moist soil throughout profile Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin . M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indi t rs minimum of Qne re uired' cherR all that a I Secqndery Indicators 2 or more re aired _ Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (611) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (613) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (64) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) J Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (65) _... Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (66) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No _ ✓ _ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No _ ✓ _ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes-- No ✓ includes ca illa fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Interim Version I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Zaremba-34001 Pacific Hwy S City/County: Federal Way+'King Sampling Date: 2/12/13 Applicant/Owner: Progressive Insurance Claims State: WA Sampling Point: S3 Investigator(s): Scott Brainard, Niels Pedersen Section, Township, Range: 20, 21N, 04E, WM Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslOpe Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): >5% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47°17'46.18" N Long: 122' 19' 00.22" W Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Everett-Alderwood gravelly sandy loams 6-15% NWI classification: Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _ _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes — ✓ _ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No _ ✓ _ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ _ No _ ✓ ✓ T within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No ✓ , Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ _^ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Pseudotsuga menziesii 80 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2_ Populus balsamifera 20 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 1Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 100 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33% (A/B) Saolino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1 Sambucus racemosa 25 Y FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: MutW& by: 2. Rhododendron macrophyllum 20 Y FACU 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = 5 45 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) UPL species x 5 = Carex obnu to 1. p 10 Y OBL Column Totals: T_ (A) (B) 2. 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 5 _ Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is 53.0' 6 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 9. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 10. Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 11. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 90 _ = Total Cover Woody Vine at atum (Plot size: ) 1. Rubus laciniatus 35 Y FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation ✓ 2 Present? Yes No 35 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 90 US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color (moist) °I Color (moist) % Type 1 oc` Texture Rema k 0-18+ 10 YR 3/2 100 gravelly sandy loam dry throughout profile 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Da etion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrv, Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: ✓ Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indite a minimum of one required: check all that apply) 2 or mot a utred Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA _ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B 1) Aquatic Invertebrates (613) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (66) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No _ ✓ _ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Interim Version i WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Zaremba-34001 Pacific Hwy S City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: 2/12/13 Applicant/Owner: Progressive Insurance Claims State: WA Sampling Point: S4 Investigator(s): Scott Brainard, Niels Pedersen Section, Township, Range: 20, 21N, 04E, WM Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): >5% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47°17'46.18" N Long: 122' 19' 00.22" W Datum: WG384 Soil Map Unit Name: Everett-Alderwood gravelly sandy loams 6-15% NWI classification: Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ _ No _ _ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _ —significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _ ✓ _ No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes— ✓ _ No— _ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No _ ✓ ` within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Alnus rubra 40 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) 2 Salix lucida 30 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3. Populus balsamifera 20 Y FAC 5 Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 90 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW., or FAC: 100% (A/B) 5pplinQlShrub Stratum (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 2 Total "A Cover of: Mul irily by 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = 5 0 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) UPL species x 5 = Careobnu to 1. x p 70 Y OBL Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Phalaris arundinacea 30 Y FACW 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 5 ✓ Dominance Test is >50% 6 Prevalence Index is 53.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 9. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 11 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 100 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1, Hydrophytic 2 Vegetation ✓ Present? Yes No = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features {Inches] Color m i t % Color (moist) % Type Lac Texture Remarks 0-18+ 10 YR 3/2 100 gravelly sandy loam 'Type: C=Concentratlon, D=De Ietion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. xLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re uired• check all that ap2JO Secondary indicators 2 or more re ui e _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) ✓ Saturation (A3) _ _ Salt Crust (1311) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (61) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (04) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (65) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No _ ✓ _ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Interim Version BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLANTING PLAN (INSET) SCALE1"--10' 0 PACIFIC WILLOW RED OSIER DOGWOOC 0) PACIFIC NINEBARK 0 BLACK TWINBERRY SNOWBERRY Btt,,�j`es1E'srhaxeemess1F&xtissgF&x (40Y&P% CRITICAL AREA STUDY MAP 776R.= L1R,1 _ AQnnRESS1VF IIVSURAJVCE 34001 PACIFIC HIGHWAY S, FEDERAL WAY, WA PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21, RANGE 04E, WM REVISION #1 1,648 BUFFER IMPACT (CLEARING LIMITS FOR STORMWATER LINE) EASTERN EDGE OF WETLAND A CATEGORY II 100-FOOT BUFFER GRAVEL ACCESS Common Name Latin Name Size Spacing Quanti Pacific willow Sal&Jacida whip 6' 9 red osier dogwood Comas aiba whip 6' 9 Pacific ninebark Physocarpas capitatas 1 gal 61 13 black twinberry Lonicara invoiucrata 1 gal 61 13 snowberry Symphoricarpos a/bus 1 gal 6' 13 624 SF BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA EX. DETENTION POND I,VVL VI 1 VIY11 VI V \I \ 1 vv• • �, \ „•„ • •v . (CLEARING LIMITS FOR SEWER CONNECTION) IMPACT IMPACT TYPE IMPACTED GROUND COVER MITIGATION RATIO SEWER LINE 1 082 SF TEMP. GRASS GRASS SEED MIX 1:1 (1,082 SF TOTAL BUFFER IMPACT 1,082 SF IMPACT AREA) STORMWATER 268 SF TEMP. SCRUB -SHRUB LINE (1,648 SF BUFFER IMPACT BUFFER 44 SF PERM. _ TOTAL IMPACT ENHANCEMENT 2:1 AREA) BUFFER IMPACT SCRUB -SHRUB 624 SF (BIRDCAGE BARRIER) REPAIR ASPHALT 150 SF TEMP. BUFFER IMPACT ASPHALT 150SF 1.1 (OVER EX. ROAD) 1,186 SF TEMP. GRASS GRASS SEED MIX 1:1 BUFFER IMPACT 1,186 SF Scale 1" =100' 0 50 100 1,, Wet1and &g#w,1#c, 9505 190 A, ens$ S ii 106 E•er<ll,W.,h..gW, 9620E Phone:(425) 337-3174 Fa : (425) 337-3045 Emat mailhox@wetlandmsoume .com WETLAND BUFFER BUFFER I M PACT BUFFER ENHANCEMENT Critical Area Study Map Zaremba-Progressive Insurance City of Federal Way, WA REVISION #1 .Zaremba Group LLC Sheet 1 /1 Attn: Sean McDermott WRI Job #13016 14600 Detroit Ave #1500 Drawn by: NP Lakewood, OH 44122 Rev. #1 Date: 09.17.13 Associated Eardi Sciences, Inc. ❑ Lil &• 0 - Serving the Pacific Northivest Since 1981 May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 Project No. KE120322A Zaremba Group 14600 Detroit Avenue, Suite 1500 Cleveland, Ohio 44107 Attention: Mr. Sean McDermott Subject: Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Geotechnical Engineering Report New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building 34001 Pacific Highway South Federal Way, Washington City of Federal Way File #12-102319-00 Dear Mr. McDermott: RECF VE'D JUN 0 7 2013 CITY OF CAS FEDERAL WAY We are pleased to present these copies of our report for the referenced project. This report summarizes the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazards, and geotechnical engineering studies, and offers recommendations for the design and development of the proposed project. Our report is preliminary since project plans were under development at the time this report was written. We should be allowed to review the recommendations presented in this report and modify them, if needed, once final project plans have been formulated. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that the recommendations presented in this report will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or if we can be of additional help to you, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Kurt .Merriman, P.E. Senior Principal Engineer KDM/pc - KE120322A5 - Projects\20120322WEMP .Kirkland Everett Tacoma 425-827-7701 425-259-0522 253-722-2992 www.aesgeo.com GeotechnicaC Engineering 'Water Resources Environmenta(Assessments and Remediation Sustaina6Ce Development Services Geologic Asse"sments Associated Elk Sciences, Inca Serving the Pacific Worthwest Since 1981 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Geotechnical Engineering Report NEW PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CLAIMS OFFICE BUILDING Federal Way, Washington Prepared for Zaremba Group Project No. KE120322A May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, GEOLOGIC HAZARDS, AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT NEW PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CLAIMS OFFICE BUILDING Federal Way, Washington Prepared for: Zaremba Group 14600 Detroit Avenue, Suite 1500 Cleveland, Ohio 44107 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 5"' Avenue, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98033 425-827-7701 Fax: 425-827-5424 May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 Project No. KE120322A Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Proiect and Site Conditions I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazards, and geotechnical engineering studies for the proposed development. The site location is shown on the "Vicinity Map," Figure 1. The approximate locations of the explorations reviewed for this study are shown on the "Site and Exploration Plan," Figure 2. Logs of the subsurface explorations completed for this study are included in the Appendix. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide geotechnical engineering design recommendations to be utilized in the design of the project. This study included a review of selected available geologic literature, including logs of previous explorations, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water. Geotechnical engineering studies were completed to establish recommendations for the type of suitable foundations and floors, allowable foundation soil bearing pressure, anticipated foundation and floor settlement, pavement recommendations, and drainage considerations. This report summarizes our fieldwork and offers recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. We recommend that we be allowed to review the recommendations presented in this report and revise them, if needed, when a project design has been finalized. 1.2 Authorization Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Ms. Carrie Offtermatt on behalf of Zaremba Group, LLC, Our study was accomplished in general accordance with our scope of work letter dated January 22, 2013. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Zaremba Group, LLC, and its agents, for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 201.3 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc - KL•120322A5 - Project.020120322WEMP Page 1 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal fa , Washington Project and Site Conditions 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION This report is based on review of a site plan, prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, and dated April 18, 2013, provided by the client. The project, as we understand it, consists of the construction of a new claims processing building at the subject site, along with associated paved access and parking areas, frontage improvements, and utilities. We understand that the proposed building and associated improvements will be limited to the eastern half of the parcel. The project site consists of the roughly rectangular shaped parcel fronting some 345 feet on the west side of Pacific Highway South Highway 99. The property extends some 500 to 600 feet to the west of existing wetlands and ponds. The property is bounded by commercial properties to the north and south. The site slopes at low angles down to the west from Pacific Highway South. This eastern half of the site has approximately 15 feet of elevation change over some 500 feet and is covered with grass and scattered brush. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION As part of a previously -planned project at the subject site, AESI performed a field study in 2001 which included excavating nine exploration pits, drilling three exploration borings, and conducting a geologic reconnaissance to gain information about the site. The various types of materials and sediments encountered in the explorations, as well as the depths where characteristics of these materials changed, are indicated on the exploration logs presented in the Appendix. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between sediment types in the field. Our exploration pits were located in the field by survey, while the exploration borings were located by measuring from existing site features. The exploration locations are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. Also, for our review in preparing this report, we have been provided with "Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center" dated May 2005 and prepared by Conestoga -Rovers and Associates (CRA). This document includes logs of previous exploration borings, completed by CRA in 2005, at the subject site. The CRA exploration locations are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2, and copies of the CRA boring logs are presented in the Appendix of this report. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the explorations completed or referenced for this study. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc - KE120322A5 - Projem1201203221KEMP Page 2 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Wav, Washington Project and Site Conditions evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re- evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. 3.1 Exploration Pits Nine exploration pits were completed by a subcontracted backhoe. All of the exploration pits except one (exploration pit EP-5) were excavated to 13 feet below the surface. Exploration pit EP-5 was terminated at 10 feet below the surface due to refusal in concrete rubble. During the excavating, samples were obtained of each distinct soil type in each pit. The samples obtained from the pits were classified in the field and representative portions placed in watertight containers. The samples were then transported to our geotechnical laboratory for further visual classification and geotechnical laboratory testing, as necessary. The pits were continuously observed and logged by an engineering geologist from our firm. The exploration logs presented in the Appendix are based on the field logs, excavation rates and action, and inspection of the samples secured. 3.2 Exploration Borings The three AESI exploration borings were completed by advancing a 4.25-inch inside -diameter, hollow -stein auger with a subcontracted truck -mounted drill rig. During the drilling process, samples were obtained at 5-foot intervals. The borings were continuously observed and logged by an engineering geologist from our firm. The exploration logs presented in the Appendix are based on the field logs, drilling action, and inspection of the samples secured. Disturbed but representative samples were obtained by using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedure in accordance with Americana Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):D 1586. This test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2-inch outside -diameter, split -barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil with a 140-pound hammer free -falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows for each 6-inch interval is recorded and the number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the Standard Penetration Resistance ("N") or blow count. If a total of 50 blows are recorded at or before the end of one 6-inch interval, the blow count is recorded as 50 blows for the number of inches of penetration. The resistance, or N-value, provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or the relative consistency of cohesive soils. These values are plotted on the attached boring logs. The samples obtained from the split -barrel sampler were classified in the field and representative portions placed in watertight containers. The samples were then transported to our geotechnical laboratory for further visual classification and geotechnical laboratory testing, as necessary. May 16, 2013; Revised Julie 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPUpc - KE120322A5 - Projects 1201203221KEI WP Page 3 Substuface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Repot Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the field explorations reviewed for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and a review of applicable geologic literature. We reviewed geologic data for the site based on the Geologic Map of the Poverty Bay 7.5-minute Quadrangle, King and Pierce Counties, Washington, by D.B. Booth., H.H. Waldron, and K.G. Troost (2004). This map indicates that the site is underlain by a mantling of sand and gravel recessional outwash (Qvr) over till deposits (Qvt). Our explorations encountered stratigraphy that was not in agreement with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) mapped stratigraphy. It appears that the original upper sand, gravel, and possibly till that were on the site was mined and removed from the site to be replaced by fill. As shown on the field logs, the explorations generally encountered loose to medium dense fill overlying an alluvial deposit consisting of loose/medium stiff sand, clayey silt, and silty clay, overlying dense to very dense advance outwash sand and gravel. The following section presents more detailed subsurface information organized from the upper (youngest) to the lower (oldest) material and sediment types. 4.1 Stratigraph Fill Fill soils were encountered to the full depth (10 to 13 feet) excavated in all nine exploration pits and in the upper 15 to 31 feet of the borings [both Associate Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) (2001) and CRA (2005)] drilled at the site. Generally, the fill consisted of an upper fine to coarse sand with trace to little silt (outwash sand source) from the surface to between 2 and 6 feet below the surface. Below this, the fill was generally a silty sand or sandy silt with little amounts of gravel (till or glaciolacustrine source). The fill is well suited for parking lot support with minor surficial reworking and poorly to moderately suited for building support, depending on the building loads and settlement tolerances. Most of the fill may be suitable for reuse in structural areas if pockets of debris and silt are removed and the soil recompacted, weather and moisture content permitting. Glaciolacustrine Below the fill, in exploration borings EB-1. and EB-2, an alluvial deposit of loose/medium stiff clayey silt, silty clay, and fine to medium sand was encountered. This alluvial deposit was encountered between 31 and 36 feet below the surface in EB-2. The deposit was encountered from 26 feet below the surface through to the end of the boring at 39 feet below the surface in EB-1. This deposit was encountered to depths ranging from 20.5 to 40 feet in the CRA borings. May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPLIpc - KE120322A5 - ProjecIA201203221KE1WP Page 4 Subsuaface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way. Washington Project and Site Conditions Advance Outwash An advance outwash deposit of very dense sand and gravel with trace amounts of silt was encountered below the alluvium in EB-2 and below the fill in EB-3. EB-2 and EB-3 were terminated in this deposit at 38.5 and 24 feet below the surface, respectively. Sediments described as "very dense sand and gravel", analogous to advance outwash deposits, were documented as encountered in the CRA borings at depths ranging from 20 to 40 feet below the ground surface. 4.2 Hydrology Ground water seepage was encountered in exploration pits EP-1, EP-2, EP-4, EP-9, and exploration boring EB-1 at the time of our held study. The CRA boring logs all described "open and dry" borehole conditions. The seepage encountered in the AESI explorations was slight and estimated at between 1 and 3 gallons per minute and was encountered approximately 3 to 5 feet below the surface at these exploration locations. The ground water encountered is interpreted as a perched condition. The perched water occurs when surface water infiltrates down through the relatively permeable upper fill and becomes trapped or perched atop a comparatively impermeable barrier such as the siltier, lower fill or atop less permeable native deposits. During the wetter winters and springs, ground water levels may rise above the current level. It should be noted that fluctuations in the level of the ground water may also occur at any time of the year and due to variations in rainfall, irrigation, pond, and stream levels. May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPLJpc - KE120322A.5 - Projects1201203221KEMP Page 5 Subsuaface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations H. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and ground and surface water conditions, as observed and discussed herein. The discussion will be limited to seismic and erosion issues. 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS Earthquakes occur regularly in the Puget Lowland. The majority of these events are small and are usually not felt by people. However, large earthquakes do occur, as evidenced by the 1949, 7.2-magnitude event; the 2001, 6.8-magnitude event; and the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region during recorded history and was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely within a given 20-year period. Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: 1) surficial ground rupture, 2) seismically induced landslides, 3) liquefaction, and 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed project is discussed below. 5.1 Surficial Ground Rupture Generally, the largest earthquakes that have occurred in the Puget Sound area are sub -crustal events with epicenters ranging from 50 to 70 kilometers in depth. Earthquakes that are generated at such depths usually do not result in fault rupture at the ground surface. However current research indicates that surficial ground rupture is possible in the Seattle and Tacoma Fault Zones. The Seattle and Tacoma Fault Zones are areas of active research. Our current understanding of these fault zones is poor, and actively evolving. The site is located south of the currently mapped limits of the Seattle Fault Zone. Preliminary maps of the Tacoma Fault zone depict possible fault splays mapped west of the site and projecting generally toward the site area, but mapped fault splays fall short of the project site. If the currently mapped fault splays are projected, the nearest fault splay projects approximately 1/z mile south of the subject site. Due to the fact that the site is not in close proximity to known or projected fault splays, the risk of damage to the project as a result of surficial ground rupture is low, in our opinion. May 16, 2013; Revised Jame 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPUpc - KE120322A5 - Projecrs1201203221KE1WP Page 6 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Tay, Washin ton Geologic Hazards and Miti � 5.2 Seismically Induced Landslides The area of the proposed improvements does not contain steep slopes, and does not appear to have significant risk of seismically induced landslides, in our opinion. We did not complete a quantitative slope stability analysis as part of this study, and none is warranted for the currently proposed project, in our opinion. 5.3 Li uefaction Liquefaction is a process through which unconsolidated soil loses strength as a result of vibrations, such as those which occur during a seismic event. During normal conditions, the weight of the soil is supported by both grain -to -grain contacts and by the fluid pressure within the pore spaces of the soil below the water table. Extreme vibratory shaking can disrupt the grain -to -grain contact, increase the pore pressure, and result in a temporary decrease in soil shear strength. The soil is said to be liquefied when nearly all of the weight of the soil is supported by pore pressure alone. Liquefaction can result in deformation of the sediment and settlement of overlying structures. Areas most susceptible to liquefaction include those areas underlain by non -cohesive silt and sand with low relative densities, accompanied by a shallow water table. The subsurface conditions encountered at the site pose little risk of liquefaction due to relatively high density and lack of shallow ground water. No detailed liquefaction analysis was completed as part of this study, and none is warranted, in our opinion. 5.4 Ground Motion Structural design of buildings should follow 2009 International Building Code (IBC) standards using Site Class "D" in accordance with table 1613.5.2. 6.0 EROSION HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The City of Federal Way Municipal Code Section 14.30 does not specifically define erosion hazard areas. The following discussion addresses Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) erosion control regulations that will be applicable to the project. In our opinion, implementation of the following recommendations should be adequate to address City of Federal Way requirements. As of October 1, 2008, the Ecology Construction Storm Water General Permit (also known as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] permit) requires weekly Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) inspections, turbidity monitoring and May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 201.3 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL,/pc - KE120322A5 - Projecfs1201203221KEMP Page 7 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and ---ions pH monitoring for all sites 1 or more acres in size that discharge storm water to surface waters of the state. Because we anticipate that the proposed project will require disturbance of more than 1 acre, we anticipate that these inspection and reporting requirements will be triggered. The following recommendations are related to general erosion potential and mitigation. The erosion potential of the site soils is significant when the soils are exposed. The most effective erosion control measure is the maintenance of adequate ground cover. Maintaining cover measures atop disturbed ground provides the greatest reduction to the potential generation of turbid runoff and sediment transport. During the local wet season (October 151 through March 3151), exposed soil should not remain uncovered for more than 2 days unless it is actively being worked. Ground -cover measures can include erosion control matting, plastic sheeting, straw mulch, crushed rock or recycled concrete, or mature hydroseed. Some fine-grained surface soils are the result of natural weathering processes that have broken down parent materials into their mineral components. These mineral components can have an inherent electrical charge. Electrically charged mineral fines will attract oppositely charged particles and can combine (flocculate) to form larger particles that will settle out of suspension. The sediments produced during the recent glaciation of Puget Sound are, however, most commonly the suspended soils that are carried by site storm water. The fine-grained fraction of the glacially derived soil is referred to as "rock flour," which is primarily a silt -sized particle with no electrical charge. These particles, once suspended in water, may have settling times in periods of weeks or months. Therefore, the flow length within a temporary sediment control trap or pond has virtually no effect on the water quality of the discharge, since it will not settle out of suspension in the time it takes to flow from one end of the pond to the other. Reduction of turbidity from a construction site is almost entirely a function of cover measures and flow control. Temporary sediment traps and ponds are necessary to control the release rate of the runoff and to provide a catchment for sand -sized and larger soil particles, but are very ineffective at reducing the turbidity of the runoff. To mitigate the erosion hazards and potential for off -site sediment transport, we recommend the following: 1. The winter performance of a site is dependent on a well -conceived plan for control of site erosion and storm water runoff. It is easier to keep the soil on the ground than to remove it from storm water. The owner and the design team should include adequate ground -cover measures, access roads, and staging areas in the project bid to give the selected contractor a workable site. The selected contractor needs to be prepared to implement and maintain the required measures to reduce the amount of exposed May 15, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL,Ipc — KE120322A5 — Projects 1201203221KEIWP Page 8 Subsu►face Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations ground. A site maintenance plan should be in place in the event storm water turbidity measurements are greater than the Ecology standards. 2. All TESC measures for a given area to be graded or otherwise worked should be installed prior to any activity within that area. The recommended sequence of construction within a given area would be to install sediment traps and/or ponds and establish perimeter flow control prior to starting mass grading. 3. During the wetter months of the year, or when large storm events are predicted during the summer months, each work area should be stabilized so that if showers occur, the work area can receive the rainfall without excessive erosion or sediment transport. The required measures for an area to be "buttoned -up" will depend on the time of year and the duration the area will be left un-worked. During the winter months, areas that are to be left un-worked for more than 2 days should be mulched or covered with plastic. During the summer months, stabilization will usually consist of seal -rolling the subgrade. Such measures will aid in the contractor's ability to get back into a work area after a storm event. The stabilization process also includes establishing temporary storm water conveyance channels through work areas to route runoff to the approved treatment facilities. 4. All disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. If it is outside of the growing season, the disturbed areas should be covered with mulch, as recommended in the erosion control plan. Straw mulch provides the most cost-effective cover measure and can be made wind -resistant with the application of a tackifier after it is placed. 5. Surface runoff and discharge should be controlled during and following development. Uncontrolled discharge may promote erosion and sediment transport. Under no circumstances should concentrated discharges be allowed to flow over significant slopes. 6. Soils that are to be reused around the site should be stored in such a manner as to reduce erosion from the stockpile. Protective measures may include, but are not limited to, covering with plastic sheeting, the use of low stockpiles in flat areas, or the use of straw bales/silt fences around pile perimeters. During the period between October 151 and March 31", these measures are required. 7. On -site erosion control inspections and turbidity monitoring should be performed in accordance with Ecology requirements. Weekly and monthly reporting to Ecology should be performed on a regularly scheduled basis. TESC monitoring should be part of the weekly construction team meetings. Temporary and permanent erosion control May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL1pc — KE120322A5 — Projecrs1201203221KEMP Page 9 Subsiirface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Miti ations and drainage measures should be adjusted and maintained, as necessary, at the time of construction. It is our opinion that with the proper implementation of the TESC plans and by field -adjusting appropriate mitigation elements (best management practices [BMPs]) during construction, as recommended by the erosion control inspector, the potential adverse impacts from erosion hazards on the project may be mitigated. May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPLJpc — KE120322A5 — Projects120120322WERP Page 10 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Wa , Washington Design Recommendations III. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 7.0 INTRODUCTION Our exploration indicates that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the parcel is suitable for the proposed development provided the risks discussed are accepted and the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. The existing fill on the site is considered a moderately suitable bearing material, primarily suited to parking lot support. The ideal bearing stratum (advance outwash sand and gravel) is between 20 to 36 feet below the surface in vicinity of the proposed building footprint and greater than 39 feet in the western parking portion of the site. Therefore a deep foundation system is recommended for foundation support for the proposed building. We understand that the project design team has selected to place the new building foundation over a short aggregate pier system discussed in Section 10.0, "Foundations," below. Paved parking lots may be placed on the existing fill following its proper recompaction, as subsequently recommended. Scattered areas in the parking lots may need overexcavation and replacement to mitigate wet, soft or organic rich soils. It should be recognized that construction above existing fill soils carries an inherent risk, regardless of the remedial efforts provided to the fill surface. Pockets or layers of organic -rich or soft fill soils left in place will result in post -construction settlement. The magnitude and duration of settlement is difficult, at best, to predict. Consequently, more frequent pavement repairs and a reduced pavement design life should be expected. The risk of post -construction pavement settlement can be mitigated by removal and replacement of most of the existing fills. The removal and replacement option is very cost intensive. 8.0 SITE PREPARATION Existing buried utilities, vegetation, topsoil, and any other deleterious materials should be removed where they are located below planned construction areas. All disturbed soils should be removed to expose underlying, undisturbed, native sediments and replaced with structural fill, as needed. All excavations below final grade made for clearing and grubbing activities should be backfilled, as needed, with structural fill. Erosion and surface water control should be established around the clearing limits to satisfy local requirements. Existing fill should be removed to the selected depth below subgrade elevations of new paved surfaces. Existing fill under new parking areas should be reworked/recompacted to a minimum 12 inches below proposed subgrade. Deeper excavation locally should be expected. Areas where loose or soft, surfncial soils remain in the parking areas may require additional overexcavation and replacement with structural fill. The depth and extent of overexcavation can best be determined in the field by the geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist. We May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120321A5 — Projects1201203221KEMP Page 11 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal W , Washington Design Re comrneridations recommend that parking areas be proof -rolled with a loaded dump truck to identify any soft areas. Generally, overexcavations greater than 5 feet below grade should not be necessary. 8.1 Site Drainage and Surface Water Control The site should be graded to prevent water from ponding in construction areas and/or flowing into excavations. Exposed grades should be crowned, sloped, and smooth drum -rolled at the end of each day to facilitate drainage. Accumulated water must be removed from subgrades and work areas immediately prior to performing further work in the area. Equipment access may be limited; and the amount of soil rendered unfit for use as structural fill may be greatly increased if drainage efforts are not accomplished in a timely sequence. If an effective drainage system is not utilized, project delays and increased costs could be incurred due to the greater quantities of wet and unsuitable fill, or poor access and unstable conditions. We anticipate that perched ground water could be encountered in excavations completed during construction. We do not anticipate the need for extensive dewatering in advance of excavations. The contractor should be prepared to intercept any ground water seepage entering the excavations and route it to a suitable discharge location. Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the buildings at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or to collect adjacent to foundations or within the immediate building area. We recommend that a gradient of at least 3 percent for a minimum distance of 10 feet from the building perimeters be provided, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of 1 percent should be provided, unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structures. 8,2 Subgrade Protection To the extent that it is possible, existing pavement should be used for construction of staging areas. If building construction will proceed during the winter, we recommend the use of a working surface of sand and gravel, crushed rock, or quarry spalls to protect exposed soils, particularly in areas supporting concentrated equipment traffic. In winter construction staging areas and areas that will be subjected to repeated heavy loads, such as those that occur during construction of masonry walls, a minimum thickness of 12 inches of quarry spalls or 18 inches of pit run sand and gravel is recommended. If subgrade conditions are soft and silty, a geotextile separation fabric, such as Mirafi 5OOX or approved equivalent, should be used between the subgrade and the new fill. For building pads where floor slabs and foundation construction will be completed in the winter, a similar working surface should be used, composed of at least 6 inches of pit run sand and gravel or crushed rock. Construction of working surfaces from advancing fill pads could be used to avoid directly exposing the subgrade soils to vehicular traffic. May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. .IPLIpc — KE120322A5 — Projects 1201203221KEMP Page 12 Sidisurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington_ Design Recommendations Foundation subgrades may require protection from foot and equipment traffic and ponding of runoff during wet weather conditions. Typically, compacted crushed rock or a lean -mix concrete mat placed over a properly prepared subgrade provides adequate subgrade protection. Foundation concrete should be placed and excavations backfilled as soon as possible to protect the bearing surface. 8.3 Proof-Rolliqg and Sub rade Com action Following the recommended clearing, site stripping, and planned excavation, the stripped subgrade within the building areas should be proof -rolled with heavy, rubber -tired construction equipment, such as a fully loaded, tandem -axle dump truck. Proof -rolling should be performed prior to structural fill placement or foundation excavation. The proof -roll should be monitored by the geotechnical engineer so that any soft or yielding subgrade soils can be identified. Any soft/loose, yielding soils should be removed to a stable subgrade. The subgrade should then be scarified, adjusted in moisture content, and recompacted to the required density. Proof -rolling should only be attempted if soil moisture contents are at or near optimum moisture content. Proof -rolling of wet subgrades could result in further degradation. Low areas and excavations may then be raised to the planned finished grade with compacted structural fill. Subgrade preparation and selection, placement, and compaction of structural fill should be performed under engineering -controlled conditions in accordance with the project specifications. 8.4 Overexcavation/Stabiiization Construction during extended wet weather periods could create the need to overexcavate exposed soils if they become disturbed and cannot be recompacted due to elevated moisture content and/or weather conditions. Even during dry weather periods, soft/wet soils, which may need to be overexcavated, may be encountered in some portions of the site. If overexcavation is necessary, it should be confirmed through continuous observation and testing by AESI. Soils that have become unstable may require remedial measures in the form of one or more of the following: I. Drying and recompaction. Selective drying may be accomplished by scarifying or windrowing surficial material during extended periods of dry and warm weather. 2. Removal of affected soils to expose a suitable bearing subgrade and replacement with compacted structural fill. 3. Mechanical stabilization with a coarse crushed aggregate compacted into the subgrade, possibly in conjunction with a geotextile. 4. Soil/cement admixture stabilization. May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPLIpc - KE120.322A5 - Projects 1201203221KEI WP Page 13 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations 8.5 Wet Weather Conditions If construction proceeds during an extended wet weather construction period and the moisture -sensitive site soils become wet, they will become unstable_ Therefore, the bids for site grading operations should be based upon the time of year that construction will proceed. It is expected that in wet conditions additional soils may need to be removed and/or other stabilization methods used, such as a coarse crushed rock working mat to develop a stable condition if silty subgrade soils are disturbed in the presence of excess moisture. The severity of construction disturbance will be dependent, in part, on the precautions that are taken by the contractor to protect the moisture- and disturbance -sensitive site soils. If overexcavation is necessary, it should be confirmed through continuous observation and testing by a representative of our firm. 8.6 Temporary and Permanent Cut Slopes In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, we anticipate that temporary, unsupported cut slopes in the existing fill can be made at a maximum slope of 1.511:1V (Horizontal: Vertical) or flatter. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur, and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. If ground water seepage is encountered in cut slopes, or if surface water is not routed away from temporary cut slope faces, flatter slopes will be required. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. Permanent cut and structural fill slopes that are not intended to be exposed to surface water should be designed at inclinations of 2H:1V or flatter. All permanent cut or fill slopes should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM:D 1557, and the slopes should be protected from erosion by sheet plastic until vegetation cover can be established during favorable weather. 8.7 Frozen Subgrades If earthwork takes place during freezing conditions, all exposed subgrades should be allowed to thaw and then be recompacted prior to placing subsequent lifts of structural fill or foundation components. Alternatively, the frozen material could be stripped from the subgrade to reveal unfrozen soil prior to placing subsequent lifts of fill or foundation components. The frozen soil should not be reused as structural fill until allowed to thaw and adjusted to the proper moisture content, which may not be possible during winter months. 9.0 STRUCTURAL FILL All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type and placement, and compaction of materials, as discussed in this section. If a percentage of May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPLIpc - KE120322A5 - Projecrs1201203221KEIWP Page 14 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Desi n Recominendations compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. After stripping, planned excavation, and any required overexcavation have been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground in areas to receive fill should be recompacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum density using ASTM:D 1557 as the standard. If the subgrade contains silty soils and too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free -draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free -draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non -organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum density using ASTM:D 1557 as the standard. In the case of roadway and utility trench filling, the backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with current City of Federal Way or Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) codes and standards. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the locations of the roadway edges before sloping down at an angle of 2H:1V. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by AESI prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture -sensitive. Use of moisture -sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather conditions. The existing fill soils present on -site contained variable amounts of silt and are considered moisture -sensitive. In addition, construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free -draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free -draining fill consists of non -organic soil with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction with at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. A representative from our firm should inspect the stripped subgrade and be present during placement of structural fill to observe the work and perform a representative number of in -place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the earthwork may be evaluated as filling May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL.Ipc - KE120.322A5 - Project51201203221KEMP Page 15 Siffisutface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Desken Recom►nendations progresses, and any problem areas may be corrected at that time. It is important to understand that taking random compaction tests on a part-time basis will not assure uniformity or acceptable performance of a fill. As such, we are available to aid in developing a suitable monitoring and testing program. 10.0 FOUNDATIONS The ideal bearing stratum (advance outwash sand and gravel) is between 20 to 36 feet below the surface in vicinity of the proposed building footprint. Therefore a deep foundation system is recommended for foundation support for the proposed building. We understand that the project design team has selected to place the new building foundation over a short aggregate pier system discussed below. 10.1 Short Aggregate Piers (SAPs) We recommend that the proposed new building be supported by SAPS. SAPS consist of columns of compacted crushed rock placed in displaced holes. Installation of SAPs results in significant densification of the surrounding soils, as well as a network of compacted stone columns. There is little consistency between different contractors who install SAPs with respect to their installation equipment and methods. The diameters, depth capability, compactive energy, and other critical factors of each contractor's equipment must be considered when designing a SAP foundation system, and therefore such systems are typically designed by the contractor who installs them. Once SAPs are installed, the building is constructed with a conventional shallow foundation system above a subgrade that has been improved through installation of SAPs. Air and water jetting during pier installation is not allowed on this project. The SAPs should be installed after the site is excavated and the building pad is established. The purpose of SAPs is to both improve existing loose soils and to transmit loads to more competent bearing materials at depths. SAPs are formed by displacing holes to a pre -determined depth with a specific diameter vibratory mandrel. Crushed rock is then compacted into the holes in thin lifts. The result is a column of compacted aggregate and compaction of soils surrounding the SAPs. Conventional shallow foundations are then constructed above the subgrade after SAPs have been installed. The SAP contractor should review exploration logs contained in this report carefully. All of our explorations encountered existing fill. Existing fill was observed to contain organic material and construction debris. It is likely that the fill will contain rocks or wood that would hinder SAP installation. Where drilling obstacles are encountered, the contractor should be prepared to relocate SAPs, or remove obstacles, as needed. We recommend that the contractor select his preferred installation equipment based on a careful review of the subsurface data. In our opinion, using May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPUpc - KE120322A5 - Projects1201203221KEMP Page 16 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechrnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washh! ton Desi n Recommendations a system of SAPs, it would be possible to achieve allowable foundation soil bearing pressures of 4,000 pounds per square foot (psf). 10.2 Drainage Considerations Foundations should be provided with foundation drains placed at the base of footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The drains should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the proposed buildings. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system, but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to walls should be sloped downward away from the proposed structures to achieve surface drainage. 10.3 Below -Ground Structures We understand that the current plan includes below -ground structures for water quality elements of the stormwater system, including the storm filter vault and oil/water separator, and that the City of Federal Way required water quality systems to be above ground. Based on the depth of fill encountered during past explorations, it is our opinion that the excavation and removal of a portion of the existing fill for the placement of these structures below ground will reduce the thickness of fill below the structures, reducing the degree of settlement risk to the structures versus the placement of the structures above the existing thickness of fill. Should the remaining, smaller risk of settlement be unacceptable for the below -ground water quality structures, we recommend that these structures be supported on SAPs, as described above. 11.0 FLOOR SUPPORT Floor slabs can be supported on 2 or more feet of new structural fill placed above existing site fills provided the risk of post -construction settlement and cracking is accepted. If existing fill is to be left in place under floor slabs, and the risk of post -construction settlement is not acceptable, we recommend that floor slab subgrades be improved with the installation of SAPs. Aggregate pier design should use as a goal an effective subgrade modulus of at least 100 pounds per cubic inch (pci) for areas under floor slabs. Floor slab design for areas underlain by aggregate piers should be coordinated between the project structural engineer and the aggregate pier designer. Floor slabs should be cast atop a minimum of 4 inches of clean, washed, crushed rock or pea gravel to act as a capillary break. Areas of subgrade that are disturbed (loosened) during construction should be compacted to a non -yielding condition prior to placement of capillary break material. Floor slabs should also be protected from dampness by an impervious moisture barrier at least 10 mils thick. The moisture barrier should be placed between the capillary break material and the concrete slab. May 16, 201.3; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPUpc - KE120322A5 - Projects 1201203221KE1WP Page 17 Substuface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations 12.0 FOUNDATION WALLS All backfill behind foundation walls or around foundation units should be placed as per our recommendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the report. Horizontally backfilled walls, which are free to yield laterally at least 0.1 percent of their height, may be designed using an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Fully restrained, horizontally backfilled, rigid walls that cannot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 50 pcf. Walls with sloping backfill up to a maximum gradient of 2H:1 V should be designed using an equivalent fluid of 55 pcf for yielding conditions or 75 pcf for fully restrained conditions. If parking areas are adjacent to walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces. As required by the 2009 IBC, retaining wall design should include a seismic surcharge pressure in addition to the equivalent fluid pressures presented above. Considering the site soils and the recommended wall backfill materials, we recommend a seismic surcharge pressure of 5H and 10H psf, where H is the wall height in feet for the "active" and "at -rest" loading conditions, respectively. The seismic surcharge should be modeled as a rectangular distribution with the resultant applied at the mid -point of the walls. The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill consisting of excavated on -site soils, or imported structural fill compacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D 1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended, as this will increase the pressure acting on the walls. A lower compaction may result in settlement of the slab -on -grade or other structures supported above the walls. Thus, the compaction level is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings or heavy construction equipment must be added to the above values. Perimeter footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the walls. This would involve installation of a minimum, 1-foot-wide blanket drain to within 1 foot of finish grade for the full wall height using imported, washed gravel against the walls. A prefabricated drainage mat is not a suitable substitute for the gravel blanket drain unless all backfill against the wall is free -draining. 12.1 Passive Resistance and Friction Factors Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural glacial soils or supporting structural fill soils, and by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with structural fill and compacted to May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPUpc - KE120322A5 - Projects 120120322 IM WP Page 18 Subsu►face Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal May, Washin ton Desi _n Recommendations at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density to achieve the passive resistance provided below. We recommend the following allowable design parameters: • Passive equivalent fluid = 350 pcf • Coefficient of friction = 0.30 13.0 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 13.1 New Pavements - Southbound Lane of Highway 99 Improvements As part of a study completed in 2004 for a previously -planned project at the subject site, we completed an analysis of the pavement section for the planned improvements to the west shoulder of Highway 99 (Pacific Highway South), which fronts the project site. The analysis was completed using data provided to us, assumed soil and traffic data, data presented in Section 4.03 of the Draft King County design standards, and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) design methods (1993). Traffic inputs were based in part on information provided by the City of Federal Way, including year 2003 ADT values for one -directional traffic on Highway 99 (southbound). The City of Federal Way traffic engineering section recommended we use a percent contribution by vehicle class of 2 percent heavy vehicles and an average 20-year growth factor of 2.5 to 3.0 percent which was averaged to 2.75 percent for our calculations. In order to calculate an 18-kip Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL) value for use in the design, we were able to use the aforementioned class distribution of heavy and light vehicles. We used the City of Auburn Pavement Design Manual as a guide to formulate our assumptions regarding the heavy vehicle distribution. The vehicle distribution assumptions and the calculated ESAL are shown in the attached calculations. Based on our analysis alone, we calculated a minimum pavement section consisting of 7.5 inches of Class A asphalt concrete pavement (ACP) underlain by 12.5 inches of crushed rock base (CRB). However, based on our conversations with the City of Federal Way, the approved pavement section for Highway 99 HOV Lane Phase II construction completed by C112M Hill in April 2004 consisted of 4.2 inches of Class "A" over 6 inches of Class "E" ACP. Also, for our use in preparing this report, we have been provided with a plan sheet titled "Sanitary Sewer Notes and Road Cross Sections", prepared for Progressive Insurance by Triad Associates and dated June 1, 2007, showing the same previously -approved pavement section along the portion of the west shoulder of Highway 99 fronting the project site. Given that our calculated ACP section is substantially lighter than the section approved for the above -mentioned projects, including a previously -planned project at the subject site, it is unlikely that the City will accept the lighter section. Therefore, we recommend the project be May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL,/pc - KE120322A5 - Projects1201203221KE1WP Page 19 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recominendatioiis designed to match the more substantial Highway 99 HOV Lane Phase II section. It should be noted that this thicker section is still less than the standard arterial section which is 3.5 inches Class "A" over 10 inches Class "E" over 6 inches of crushed rock. The City of Federal Way will likely require that the new, widened portion of Highway 99 have a pavement section equal to or better than the existing pavement section on the existing shoulder of Highway 99, regardless of the results of our analysis. Therefore, we recommend that the existing pavement section be measured at the time of construction. If the existing pavement section is more substantial (with a higher Structural Number) than paving recommended in this letter, the new pavement section should be revised to match the existing paving. 13.2 New Pavements - Extension of South 340th Street Based on our previous 2004 study, South 340th Street was classified as a minor collector road. Therefore, in our opinion, the Federal Way standard section for minor collector roads is appropriate for design of South 340th Street provided subgrade improvements/preparations are completed in accordance with the following section entitled Subgrade Preparation - Roadways. 13.3 Subgrade Preparation - Roadways The pavement section for Highway 99 and South 340th Street must be placed on a properly prepared subgrade consisting of a minimum 2-foot thickness of existing silty sand fill compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum density in accordance with ASTM:D 1557. The upper 2 feet of existing fill below planned pavement subgrade elevation should be removed and the underlying soil recompacted to 95 percent. The recompacted fill subgrade should be proof -rolled with a loaded tandem -axle dump truck to identify soft spots. Soft spots and any organic soils identified by the geotechnical engineer's representative should be removed from the subgrade area and be replaced with compacted structural fill under observation of the geotechnical engineer's representative. Structural fill should then be placed to desired pavement subgrade elevation as 8-inch loose lifts compacted to 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free -draining sand and gravel should be used. Free -draining fill consists of non -organic soil with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction with at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. It may be necessary to place an engineering stabilization fabric such as Mirafi 50OX (or equivalent) between the fill subgrade and the new structural fill at the discretion of the geotechnical engineer's representative at the time of construction. These subgrade preparation recommendations and the recommended pavement sections are predicated on AESI's examination of the structural fill subgrade and testing the compaction of the structural fill pavement subgrade and crushed rock sections during May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc - KE120322A5 - Projens1101203221 KEMP Page 20 Subsluface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Des! n Recommendations construction. Given the potentially variable in -place density of the existing fill subgrade, some settlement of paved areas should be anticipated unless the existing fill is entirely removed and replaced with structural fill. All pavement section thicknesses presented should be considered compacted thicknesses. CRB sections must also be compacted to 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557. Paving materials and procedures should be consistent with current WSDOT design standards. 13.4 Pavement Sections - Site Interior Roadways and Parkin Areas The majority of the parking and access areas are planned for those portions of the site underlain by fill materials. Therefore, some remedial measures may be necessary for support of pavement. To reduce the depth of overexcavation required to achieve a suitable subgrade for support of the pavement, we recommend that an engineering stabilization fabric be placed over the stripped subgrade prior to filling if silty soft, loose, or wet soils are encountered. The addition of an engineering stabilization fabric permits heavier traffic over soft subgrade and increases the service life of the system. The fabric acts as a separation barrier between relatively fine-grained surficial materials on the site and the load -distributing aggregate (sand or crushed rock). As a separator, it reduces the loss of costly aggregate material into the subgrade and prevents the upward pumping of contaminating silt into the aggregate. The high tensile strength and low modulus of elongation of the fabric also act to reduce localized stress by redistributing traffic loads over a wider area of subgrade. In addition, the recommended method of installation (proof -rolling) identifies weak areas, which can be improved prior to paving. After the area to be paved is stripped, engineering stabilization fabric such as Mirafi 50OX (or equivalent) should be placed over any encountered soft/loose subgrade that cannot be recompacted to a firm, non -yielding condition, with the edges overlapped in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Following subgrade preparation, 1 foot of existing silty sand fill should be placed over the fabric and compacted to 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557. If fill is placed during wet weather or proper compaction cannot be achieved with the on -site soils, the upper foot of pavement subgrade should be replaced with clean, free -draining structural fill. Where fabric is exposed, spreading should be performed such that the dozer remains on the fill material and is not allowed to operate on uncovered fabric. When 12 inches of fill has been placed, the fabric should be proof -rolled with a loaded dump truck to pretension the fabric and identify soft spots in the fill. Upon completing the proof -rolling operation, additional structural fill should be placed and compacted to attain desired grades, if necessary. May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. .IPL/pc - KE120322A5 - Projects1201203221KEMP Page 21 SubsuiJace Exploration, Geologic Hazards, New Progressive Insurance Claims Office Building and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recoinniendations Upon completion of the structural fill, a pavement section consisting of 3 inches of ACP underlain by 2 inches of 5/8-inch crushed surfacing top course and 4 inches of 1 1/4-inch crushed surfacing base course is the recommended minimum for drive lanes and 21/2 inches over 6 inches of crushed rock in parking areas. The crushed rock courses must be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. Given the potentially variable in -place density of the existing fill subgrade, some settlement of paved areas should be anticipated unless the existing fill is entirely removed and replaced with structural fill. 14.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING Our report is preliminary since project plans were not finalized at the time this report was written. We recommend that AESI, perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, we can confirm that our earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundation system depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of this current scope of work. If these services are desired, please let us know, and we will prepare a cost proposal. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Jeffrey P. Wb, L.G., L.E.G. Senior Project Engineering Geologist I Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Senior Principal Engineer Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Site and Exploration Plan Appendix: Exploration Logs - AESI (2001) and CRA (2005) May 16, 2013; Revised June 6, 2013 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL./pc - KE120322A5 - Projecrs1201203221KEMP Page 22 � �+ r.�r I � i�•�' �.�...:� ,fir*F�i'�� � ' �;Et�;_•� ? ,r- i f J . � . y�'( 1 �,� 1: ,1t bile • I Kt + ,•,�' �• �I (•••• � •'' •1 1 sit ik -r-ti 1 �� � CE1�7ER--. ; tw ¢ •i ; !� i l � �'' -.J �rl SITES, 1 f�!' �`,� ■ - {3 + 4�� �� ,• •� � �+ rl r�� F .._ •mil � r y� ■ i f !f1 i I ■ ■ 1 � • ' a' "rS 15" I I app rifle 51 4 _ �� �I' • ,.a ':•- I '�: '' �_ a■ ;�: �� � III �� � � � _.� f • is Jita►tcjker ,; , •, f i llrtj•. Sri ■ ! i I .ems ,� l � �., �+ flrl. ��• R .� •Er E�_I16AAA �j� j�.� LLL�?iJlx JJ � �M i 'I �:�f �NY.1 !•� � is 71 0 1000 2000 LL i' NOTE: BLACKAND WHITE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLOR ORIGINAL MAY FEET N REFERENCE: USGS TOPOI REDUCE ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND LEADTO INCORRECT INTERPRETATION. m Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 5/13 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE GTIONFACILITY ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ D FEDERAL PROJ. NO. KE1T 0322A N 7 TZ J. E4139tr Wmrtw z! "C C I I p —7 7- -6 J N/j 7 70 EP-7 LP TT 5 At? BH6 i 0 EP-1 42 r BUILDING SETBACK .......... -------- ............. ..... ............ APPROXIMATE LOCATION . . . . . . ---- -- ----------- ------ ....... ------ OF BORE HOLE OLD BH2 BY CRA 2005 - TYP A BH1 P1.2 A BH102 A 131-110'rill 91 1 BH101A P Fj j, ET(i, 'A APPROXIMATE LOCATION 2,p + Fm 0+00 ORING A OF EXPLORATION B TYP C? 0 EB-1 AESI 2001 F�APPOSI�D BUILDING T; PVU 03'.L T- .7 10 1 OEB-2 A BH105' BH104 �j r L > APPROXIMATE LOCATION A BH A BH EP-5 < —A BH4 OF EXPLORATION PIT I LEP-2 EP-8 app f saki 336,11 �;IREU . . . i -- lL BY AESI 2001 TYP I k PQ SLMKK 0 ell ,!!Jry •4L AL BH6 /V I ir 11, L* I II ill 1 1 ` �1 r '' i' f 03 If + I I i!#fi#I III{IIf I I ,j, t EP-4 Ep /T. Jill 0 ifin w ----------------- .......il ----------- I ........ ... . .... ... ........ -------- FIN is BUILDING SETBACK W/ ry r5�it N �� 19 All 0 30 60 p! / / i. � .1 LL FEET p, I;*r REFERENCE: ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC FIGURE 2 SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. PROGRESSIVE DATE 5/13 SSIVE INSURANCE CLAIMS FACILITY a. FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON PROD. NO. KE120322A N APPENDIX ; o Well -graded gravel and Terms Describing'Relative Density and Consistency E LL _ °. 0 GW gravel with sand, little to Density&TC2Ibiowslfoat N lr no fines Very Loose 0 to 4 Coarse - ° ° ° o ° ° ° a°o°o GP Poorly -graded gravel a) m rn e W Loose 4 to 10 Grained Soils Medium Dense 10 to 30 Test Symbols o ° and gravel with sand, Dense 30 to 50 O o c c °°°°° °;°a° little to no fines Very Dense >50 G =Grain Size w e z h c ° o° o° M= Moisture Content Consistency SP7lxlblowslfook A = Atterberg Limits z° Silty gravel and silty Very Soft 0 to 2 C = Chemical t a m �m , o ; GM gravel with sand Fine- Soft 2 to 4 DD =Dry Density Grained m 2 c Soils Medium Stiff 4 to 8 K= Permeability SUN 8 to 15 Clayey gravel and Very Stiff 15 to 3o �n Gc clayey gravel with sand Hard >30 o LO Component Definitions o Well -graded sand and Descripkiy_ a Term Size #uncle and Sieve Number = F Syl( sand with gravel, little Boulders Larger than 12" C rL,*.,.,.,.,l to no fines Cobbles 3" to 12' y o E > Gravel 3" to No. 4 (4.75 mm) Coarse Gravel 3" to 3/4" Ln ; : y _ Poorly -graded sand w U SIP and sand with gravel, Fine Gravel 3/4" to No, 4 (4.75 mm) o d little to no fines Sand No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) z Coarse Sand No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No_ 10 (2.00 mm) Q) o N n SM Silly sand and silty sand with Medium Sand No. 10 (2.00 mm) to No. 40 (0.425 mm) No. to No. 200 075 Ca H . • Fine Sand 40 (0.425 mm) (0 mm) 0 o i gravel Silt and Clay Smaller than No. 200 (0.075 mm) LO c Ni (3) Estimated Percentage Moisture Content,a Sc Clayey sand and f clayey sand with gravel Percentage by Dry -Absence of moisture, Component dusty, dry to the touch - Weight Trace <5 Slightly Moist - Perceptible 10 moisture Slit, sandy silt, gravelly silt, $ Ml. silt with sand l or grave Few 5 to Little 15 to 25 Moist - Damp but no visible m co T With Non -primary coarse water Clay of low to medium co N cc y constituents; > 15% Very Moist - Water visible but D v a, C J CL plasticity; silty, sandy, or Fines content between not free draining y M = gravelly clay, lean clay 5,° and 15% Wet -Visible free water, usually 0 y D from below water table a � _ —_ Organic clay or silt of low Symbols =i = — O1- plasticity Blows/s° or 0 = Sampler portion of 6' Cement grout Type ' surface seal Elastic silt silt, clayey silt, Sam ter T e 2.0"y2e o m MH with micaceous or Sp,itOSpoon A Descriition S•] Bentonile seal o diatomaceous fine sand or Silt Sampler 3.0" OD Split -Spoon Sam ler p ': Rller pack with 'o m o` (SPn 3.25" OD Split -Spoon Ring Sampler 14] : .= blank casing Clay of high plasticity, o c `= CH sandy or gravelly clay, fat _ Bulk sample 3.0" OD Thin -Wall Tube Sampler section Screened casing yE J clay with sand or gravel t inciudin Shelb tube r 9 Y ) :' or Hydrolip with filter pack in Grab Sample End cap jfr�� fir Organic clay or silt of a Portion not recovered i rfrf OH medium to high f11 Percentage by dry weight t4] Depth of groundwater Ff�r f plasticity l21 (SPT) Standard Penetration Test g ATD = At time of drilling (ASTM D-1588) tat SZ Static water level (date) In General Accordance with a C m Peat, muck and other 0) rn o t PT highly organic Solis Standard Practice for Description t7 Combined USCS symbols used far = O and Identification of Soils (ASTM D=2488) Fines between 5% and 15% JClassifications of soils in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations, which include density/consistency, moisture condition, grain size, and plasticity estimates and should not be construed to imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual -manual and/or laboratory classification omethods of ASTM D-2487 and D-2488 were used as an identification guide fog the Unified Soil Classification System. 0 S - - oi Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. o� EXPLORATION LOG KEY FIGURE Al a LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-1 a This log is part of the rep adt y�repared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES1) for the named prgect and should be S read together with IN repgrt €or complete Interpretation. ThIs summary applies only to the location of this trench at the lu time of excavation. S ubsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are o I a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION \Sod and Topsail FIII 1 Loose to medium dense, moist to wet, light olive -brown and light gray, nonstratitled, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, trace to little flne to coarse subrounded and subangular gravel, little clayey silt in 2 clumps and zones up to 2'x2', trace organics throughout, trace subrounded cobbles and boulders to 16" In diameter, trace small logs. (SM) 3 -, 4 '5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal Way U-Haul Federal Way, WA ASSOCIATED Logged by: JDC /M EARTH Approved by: SCIENCES„ INC Project No. KE01111 G February 2001 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-2 CL p This tog is part of the report Rrepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inr.. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of [his trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of lime. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Fill 1 - Medium dense, moist, light olive -brown, nonstratifted, SILTY fine to medium SAND, trace fine subrounded gravel, trace disseminated organics. (SM) 2 3 4 Loose to medium dense, wet, light gray, nonstratif[ed, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, little fine to f coarse subrounded gravel, trace disseminated organics, trace subrounded cobbles. (SM) 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 - 13 14 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 13 feet Slight caving below 3. Slight seepage (-2-3 gpm) at 3', 5', and 10'. 15 16 17 18 19 Federal Way U-Haul Federal Way, WA ASSOCIATEO Logged by: JDC EARTH Approved by: YA"EMSCIEr-iCES, INC Project No. KE01111 G February 2001 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-3 This lag is part of the report prepared by Associaled Earth Sciences, Inc, (AES1) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete Interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the lime of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location W I h the passage of dine. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION — Fill Medium dense to dense, moist, light olive -brown, nonstratified, SILTY fine to medium SAND, trace fine to coarse subrounded gravel, trace disseminated organics. (SM) gense, moist, light gray, nonstraitified, SANDY SILT, trace disseminated organics, trace fne to coarse subrounded gravel. (ML-SM) Bottom of exploration pit at depth 13 feet No caving. No seepage. Federal Way U-Haul Federal Way, WA ASSOCIATED Project No. KE01111G_ r Logged by: JDC; EARTH Approved by: SCIENCES, INC February 2001 U Y LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-4 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should he read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies enly to the location of this trench at the Iv time of excavation. Subsurface condi ons may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are ❑ a simpification of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Ld and Topsoil __ Fill Loose 1 _ Loose to medium dense, moist, light olive -brown, nonstratified, fine to medium SAND, little silt, trace 2 disseminated organics, trace fine to coarse subrounded gravel. (SM) 3--------------------------------------------- Very stiff/loose, moist to wet, light gray, nonstratified, CLAYEY SILT, little fine to coarse sand, trace fine to coarse subrounded gravel, trace disseminated organics, trace concrete rubble to 24" in 4 diameter at 12'. (ML) 5 Ci 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 13 feet No caving. Slight seepage (2-3 gpm) at 3'. Federal Way U-Haul Federal Way, WA Logged by: JDC ASSOCIATED EARTH Approved by: JAIEMSCIENCES, INC Project: No. KE01111G_ February 2001 1 2 3 4 5 11 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-5 This lag is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named p�roject and should be read together with that report far complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the locatlon of this french at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a slmpification of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Fill Loose to medium dense, moist to wet, light gray, nonstratified, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, little fine to coarse subrounded gravel, trace silty clay in isolated clumps, trace disseminated organics, trace concrete rubble to 24" in diameter, trace brick fragments. (SM) Bottom of exploration pit at depth 10 feet due to meeting refusal on concrete rubble. No caving. No seepage. Federal Way U-Haul Federal Way, WA ASSOCIATED Logged by: JDC EARTH Approved by: ALMSCIENCES, INC Project No. KE01111G_ February 2001 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-6 This log is part of the report prepared by Assoaated Firth 5clences, Inc. [AE-51 Far the named pproject and should be read together with that report far complete #nterpretation. Thls summary a p}les only to the locaflon of this irenoh at the lime of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are ❑ a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Fill 1 Loose to medium dense, moist, light olive -brown, nonstratified, SILTY fine to medium SAND, trace 2 fine to coarse subrounded gravel, trace disseminated organics, trace subrounded cobbles. (SM) 3 4 5 6 um dense, moist, light gray, nonstratified, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, little clayey silt invvclumps, trace to little fine to coarse gravel, trace brick fragments. (SM) Tl�'ea 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 13 feet 14 No caving. No seepage. 15 16 17 18 19 N Federal Way U-Haul Federal Way, WA ASSOCIATED Project No. KE01111G_ Logged by: JDC EARTH Approved by: AEMSCIENCEB, INC February 2001 U X LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-7 ;R This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with chat report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the CL lime of excavation. Subsurface condlflons may change at this lomtlon with the passage of time. The data presented are ❑ a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION and To I Fill 12 Medium dense, moist to wet, light olive -brown, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, trace fine to coarse subrounded gravel, trace disseminated organics. (SM) 3-Quarry Spalls ------------ - -- --- ----- 4 Very dense, wet, light gray, nonstratified, COBBLEY angular fine to coarse GRAVEL, trace fine to coarse sand, trace silt. (GW) 5 6 lyenseto medium dense, wet to moist, light gray, nonstratifed, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, little fine to coarse subrounded and subangular gravel, trace disseminated organics, trace subangular 7 cobbles. (SM) - _1 8 9 10 11 12 13 - - Bottom of exploration pit at depth 13 feet 14 — No caving. Slight seepage (-2-3 gpm) below T. 15 16 17 18 19 Federal Way U-Haul Federal Way, WA ASSOCIIATEO Logged by. JDC EARTH Approved by: Jrmm SCIENCES, f ruc Project No. KE01111G February 2001 ■ LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-8 This log )s part of the report #repared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. tAESI) for the named prcjecl and should be 6 read logether uvft3i that rapprt for cumpiete ialerpretaUon. This summary apppiles onty to the loratlon of this trench at the Iu time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location vnlh the passage of time. The data presented are o a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil T r Fill Loose to medium dense, moist, light olive -brown and dark brown, nonstratified, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, trace fine to coarse subrounded gravel, trace disseminated organics. (SM) Loose to medium dense, moist, light gray, nonstratifed, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, little fine to coarse subrounded gravel, trace brick fragments, trace disseminated organics, trace subrounded and subangular cobbles. (SM) Bottom of exploration pit at depth 13 feet No caving. No seepage, Federal Way U-Haul Federal Way, WA ASSOCIATED Logged by: JDC EARTH Approved by: SCIENCES, INC Project No. KE01111G February 2001 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-9 a p This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together "th that report for complete Inlerpretalion. This summary applies only to the l,.Nlrn of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsur€ace conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplficatlon of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION _\Sod and Topsoil Fill 1 Loose to medium dense, moist, light olive -brown, nonstratified, fine to coarse SAND, little silt, trace fine to coarse subrounded gravel, trace disseminated organics. (SM) 2. 3 4 5 — -- ---- -- — --- --- ----- -- Medium dense to loose, moist to wet, light olive -brown and light gray, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, little fine to coarse subrounded and subangular gravel, trace coarse gravel to cobble -sized asphalt 6 - chunks, trace subrounded boulders to 16" in diameter, trace disseminated organics, trace silty clay clumps. (SM) 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 13 wet 14 — Slight raving throughout. Very slight seepage (< 1 gpm) below 6'. 15 16 17 18 19 li Federal Way U-Haul Federal Way, WA ASSOCIATEiO Logged by: JDC EARTH Approved by: AMMMSCIENCESMINC Project No. KE01111G February 2001 Ex oration Loci ASSOCIATED EAF;TFI Project Number Exploration Number Shea! �7CIENCES, 1PJC KE01111 G EB-1 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Way U-Haul _ ___ Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Location Federal Way, WA Datum hAASI DrilledEquipment Holt 1 B-59 Date Start/Finish n41n71n1.41q/2nn1 Hammer Weight/Drop 14091 g0" Hole Diameter (in) 4 2 a C �, Gl a En Blows/Foot cL 5 T m Ct L'n' rx �E U :a— o ° DESCRIPTION 10 20 30 40 FIII Wet, light olive -gray, nonstratified, fine to coarse SAND, little fine to coarse 12 S-1 subrounded gravel, little silt, tract- disseminated organics. (SM) 15 ao 15 5 3-2 4 s 20 11 — 10 —————— —----—---- --_—_.------ Wet to moist, light gray, nonstratified, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, trace to 1 Al S-3 little subrounded and subangular gravel. (SM) 3 4 15 S-4 4 A. 3 20 Moist, light olive -brown, nonstratified, fine to medium SAND, trace slit. 8 S-5 (SP) 10 is 9 25 --———— — — —--- _--- Wet, light olive -brawn, interbedded CLAYEY SILT and SILTY CLAY, trace 2 5 S-6 fine sand in thin lenses. (MI~ CL) 3 2 30 5 S-7 5 11 6 35 Wet, light olive -brown, stratified, SILTY tine SAND, trace organics. (SM) 5 A14 S-8 - 6 — 8 40 Bottom of expbration boring at 39 feet Sampler Type (ST): J - m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: JDC m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) l l Ring Sample Water Level() Approved by: V ® Grab Sample I Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) W Exploration Log A9513ClA'TEO EARTH Project Number Exploration Number Sheet 9ClEfVCE9, INC KE011 i 1 G EB-2 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Way U-Haul Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 304' Location Feftra May. WA Datum M-ql Driller/Equipment_Holt B-59 _T Date Start/Finish 04AJ2/f)1 d19121 DJ Hammer Weight/Drop 1409 / 30" Hole Diameter (in) A ? _ U) ur v. m na .E.o �, w Blows/Foot 12 a. S E 2 o �+ T m {s rn DESCRIPTION o " m 10 20 30 40 .F --- Fill Wet to moist, light gray, nonstratified, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, Iltlle fine g S-1 to coarse subrounded gravel, ]race concrete debris to 12" in diameter, 3 tram disseminated organics. (SM) 5 5 10 15 20 S-4 4 2 0 S-5 : 2 s 25 ----- —� — _-- --- --- -- Moist, [lark brown and light olive -brown, nonstratified, fine to coarse SAND, 2 S-6 ' little wood debris, trace silt. (SW) 3 s s 30 calluvium Moist, light olive -brown, stratified, fine to medium SAND, trace silt. (SP) 3 S-7 4 1t 7 35 — — — — — — — Advance Outwash — u T o � v 31 g-g 0 0 C Moist light olive -brown, no [stratified, SANDY fine to coarse subrounded to 50 51 Bottom of exploration boring at 38 5 feet 40 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) ❑ No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: JDC m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) 1] Ring Sample SL Water Level 0 Approved by: ® Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample t Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Exploration �rRARTHrATE1] EARTH Project Number Number Exploration Number Sheet eCIENCU� NUO KE01111G EB-3 1 of 1 _ Project Name FadeLal Way U-Haul Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 309' Location FdereiI W WA Datum WSJ Driller/Equipment Hoit I B-59 Date Start/Finish r14/f 91011.41919001 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 130" _ _ Hole Diameter (in) 425" a a� qyy 7 - Blows/Foot N a S E 2 UL E 2 a iu ° 7 W DESCRIPTION 10 20 30 40 0 Fill Moist, light gray, nonstrasf ied, SILTY fine to coarse SAND, little fine to 4 ®t S-1 coarse subrounded gravel, trace disseminated organics (SM); trace asphalt s and brick Fragments. 9 5 S-2 10 4 7 9 5-3 No Recovery 6 ®14 7 15 u — — — — — Advance Out ash r T 0 S� Moist, mottled, nonstratitiiad. SANDYfine to averse subrounded GRAVEL 24 grading to GRAVELLY tine to coarse SAND, trace silt. (GW-SW) 28 7s 0 43 D 20 O S-5 .5. 16 ,43 25 I I I I Bottom of exploration baring at 24 feet 30 35 40 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) n No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: JDC 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) ® Ring Sample Q Water Level () Approved by: ® Grab Sample �E] Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at Gme of drilling (ATD) REFERENCE No.: 038306-02 ENCLOSURE No.: Al A CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH1 ELEVATION: N/M ft _ BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 2 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty insurance Company _ LEGEND PROJECT: Gootechnical Investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center ®SS SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY. Bruce Polan CHECKED BY: _ Hassan Gilani ; - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): March 18, 2005 DATE (FINISH): March 18. 2005 L o o w _ C m rn DESCRIPTION OF SOIL AND BEDROCK '- 2 a) E n z' Z 4)- > 4) ..M e 0 U° Blows pet 61 / 15 cm 'ru 4) *6Afterberg a — 0- Shear test (Cu) Field Sensitivity (S) ❑ Lab 0 Water content (°�) limits (°�) ' 'N" Value (blows / 12 In: 30 cm) Feet Metres N/M GROUND SURFACE % N 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 e0 90 FILL - silty sand/sandy skit with organics 0.7 1 ❑ soil FILL - gray fine sand with sill, trace gravel, brick fragments, organics, moist - 11 0.5 ] 2 - 3 1.0 1 100 16 7-5-7 12 � 4 5 1.5 — 2 100 23 7-12-10 22 I 6 wood chips 6.5 - 2,0 FILL - gray sandy silt, trace clay, sand 7 and gravel, moist 8 2.5 3 100 14 .8-9-18 27 O it 9 10 3.0 driving an a stone 4 0 — 20-37-42 79 11 3.5 12 13 4.0 14 15 4.5 5 0 — 10-12-13 25 16 j 5.0 17 18 5.5 6 0 — 8-10-8 18 19 6.0 REFERENCE No.: 038606-02 F-NULUtiUKt NO.: A I CIA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH1 ELEVATION: ___eft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 2 of 2 CLIENT: Progressive Casual Insurance Company_LEGEND PROJECT: Geotechnieal Investl ation - Proposed Clelm Service Center ® SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Hahway South Federal Way, Washin tan : ® ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC -ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Bruce Polan CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilan) - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): March 18 2005 _ DATE (FINISH): March 18 2005 Feet 22 22.5 23 24 25 26 27 27.5 28 30 31 32 33 P 7 37 34 7 n i 35 n s 36 37 38 39 c Shear test (Cu) G Field C Blows g '� Sensitivity (S) ❑ Lab a > DESCRIPTION OF R a „� m E o w w c Pe 6 in. / W �, �_ O Water content (%) H o m-' �, R SOIL AND BEDROCK rn T 2 c ° 15 cm c c Anerbe limits (%) wpw, `� w N I Z V ! "N" Value (blows / 12 In.-30 cm) Metres NIM GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 7 100 4 "Al 17 O g g SAND - brown, medium dense, fine to 6.5 medium grained, trace to some gravel, damp SANDY SILT - broom, medium dense, 7.0 thick sand seams, moist g 100 13 9-10-12 22 O 7.5 8.0 8.5 "*'; ,# SAND AND GRAVEL - brown, very dense, interbedded sand seams, dry to damp End of Borehole BH1 at 29 ft depth 9.0 below existing ground level. Borehole open and dry upon completion. Borehole backfilled with bentonite chips to 3 ft depth from•ground surface. Top 3 9.5 ft backliilled with drill cuttings. NIM denotes Not Measured. 1 1 11 9 1100 15 I 16-25-45 h 70 10 GCCCGCNr:F Kin - MR1106.112 ENCLOSURE No.: A2 CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH2 ELEVATION: HIM ft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 2 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center_u _ ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Wes. Washington _ ® ST - TUBE m RC -RROCKOCK C CORE DESCRIBED BY: Bruce Polan CHECKED BY: Hassan Mani WATER LEVEL DATE (START): March 18, 2005 DATE (FINISH): March 18 2005 m o C O �„ W > �a B qi DESCRIPTION OF SOIL AND BEDROCK aN f0a m E y; 4) > .r :: !� e c Blows el P 6 In• / 15 cm o d a Shear lest (Cu) G Field Sensitivity (S) ❑ Lab O Water content Atterberg limits (%) p ® "N" Value (blows 112 In: 30 cm) Feet Metresl NIM GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 FILL - silly sandlsandy silt with organics 0.7 1 (Topsoil) FILL -gray silly fine sand, trace gravel, rootlets Ioccasional 0.5 2 3 1.0 1 100 12 6-7-9 16 ) 4 5 1.5 2 100 12 7-10-11 21 > 1 6 2.0 7 7 8 2,5 3 100 18 4-2-4 6 9 10 3.0 4 100 22 1-2-2 4 11 3.5 12 13 4.0 19C FILL - dark gray sand and gravel, some 15 4.5 wood fibres 5 100 21 11-15-16 31 16 5.0 17 1] 5.5 > :;:.•: SAND -gray, medium dense, fine to >;rY medium grained, moist 19 '<: RFFFRFNr:F Nn.- r)38906d}7 ENCLOSURE No.: A2 BOREHOLE No.: BH2 BOREHOLE REPORT CRA Engineering Inc. ELEVATION: N/M ft Page: 2 of 2 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty Insurance CompanyCompapy LEGEND PROJECT: _ Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON ® ST - SHELBY TUBE LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Highway South Federal Way, Washington m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Bruce Polan CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilanl -y - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): March 18.2005 DATE (FINISH): March 18 2005 Shear lest (Cu) A Field o a c d a� c iBlows per •r x Sensitivity (S) ❑ Lab a T DESCRIPTION OF „ M y E L c 6 in.P ` O Waterwntent{^/o) o 9., SOIL AND BEDROCK rr3 o $ "o 0 c c Atterberg limits (/o) w �TZ '� U 15 cm EL wHi ! "N" Velue (blows 112 In.-30 cm) Feet Metres N/M GROUND SURFACE % I N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Jib}�i 6 100 9 8-6-6 12 I i 21 t =Yip 6.5 22 ` `~ €v 23 7.0 24 Y 7.5 �F:[•r N' ` 25 7 100 17 5-7-10 17 26 $.0 Y 27 � 8.5 _ _._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.... _ _ •r.•:-' mo€st-wet 29 9.0 K•� .,- =i 30 t•r ti•'r%t 8 100 23 7-9-11 20 C 31 9.5 31.5 End of Borehole BH2 at 31.5 ft depth 32 below existing ground level. Borehole open and dry upon completion. 0.0 33 Borehole backfilled with bentonite chips to 3 ft depth from ground surface. Top 3 ft backfilled with drill cuttings. 34 10. N1M denotes Not Measured. 35 36 11.0 37 11. 38 39 112.0 uccG.vFnlr'ti Kin I1ARRIIK-0? ENCLOSURE No.: A3 CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH3 ELEVATION: N/M ft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 2 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Geotechnicai Investl allon - Proposed Claim Service: Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Highway South Federal Way, Washln tan ®5T - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Bruce Polan CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): March 18. 2005 DATE (FINISH): March 18. 2005 r oSOIL `d u1 m DESCRIPTION O . m c " ' T ZaU > Blows per° 6 cm _ c x a) a c� Shear test (Cu) A Field Sensitivity (s) 7 ebQo OWatercontent(%)w WAtterberg limits (%) w,( ® "N" Value (blows / 12 In.-30 cm) Feet Metresl NIM I GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 s0 FILL - silty san Randy silt with organics 0.7 1 o soli FILL - gray silty fine sand, occasional rootlets, occasional wood fibres, 0.5 moist wet 2 3 1.0 1 100 21 3-4-12 16 4 5 1.5 2 100 10 3-7-7 14 6 2.0 7 7.5 FILL - gray sandy silt, some clay, 8 2.5 occasional wood fibres and rootlets, moist 3 100 28 4-6-15 21 9 1UCA 3.0 FILL -gray sandy silt to silt sand, 11 occasional wood fibres and rootlets, moist 4 100 7 9-11-13 24 O 1 3.5 12 13 4.0 14 15 4.5 5 100 12 7-9-10 19 D 16 5.0 17 18 5.5 1s 6.01 REFERENCE No.: 0388DB-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A3 CRA Engineering inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH3 ELEVATION: _ N/M ft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 2 of 2 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company PROJECT: Geotechnical Investi don - Proposed Claim Service Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: M01 Pacific Highway South. Federal Way, Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE " m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Bruce Polan CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): March 18.2005 DATE (FINISH): March 18.2005 __ o o 'm vIm W a E DESCRIPTION OF SOIL AND BEDROCK w 14 M> T 3 Z "- Ll 15 a m 0 0 U Blows er P 15l cm ° x a m c 0- Shear test (Cu) 0 Field sensluvny (S) ❑gab O Watercontent (%) " . Atter6erg limits (%) .N' Value (blows / 12 in: 30 cm) Feet IMetresi N/M GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 ?.710 6.5•`:. 991 6 100 15 2-3-5 8 �01 t SILTY FINE SAND - gray brown, loose to medium dense, moist 22#ii 23 7.0 24 7.5 I: 25 26 8.0 l 7 100 20 5 6r7 13 i 27 28 8.5 29;! 9.0:'j 30ddlI 31 9.5 °€I 8 100 21 6-8-12 20 110 31.5 End of Borehole 5H3 at 31.5 ft depth 32 below existing ground level. Borehole open and dry upon. completion. 33 10'0 Borehole backfilled with bentonite chips to 3 It depth from ground surface. Top 3 ft backfilled with drill cuttings. 10.5 NIM denotes Not Measured. 35 3s 11. 37 11.5 38 39 12. REFERENCE No.: 038805-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A4 A CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH4 ELEVATION: N/M ft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 2 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty ksurance Company_ LEGEND PROJECT: _ Geotechnical Invest)gatlon - Proposed CI_a_im Service Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Hlo'hway South. Federal Way, Washington ® ST, - SHELBY TUBE ` m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY, Bruce Polan _ CHECKED BY: Hassan Mani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): March 18.2005 DATE (FINISH): March 18, 2005 c a o ? �.. w Q B .d � DESCRIPTION OF SOIL AND BEDROCK ` ¢� [r� CL = E- Z > 9) m »• a 0 0 U Blows per 15 cm a x 2 m c Shear fast (Cu) A Field Sensitivity (S) ❑ Lab O walorconlonl(%) wH� Altertrerg I1miLs ("/u) 0 "N' Value (blows / 121n: 30 cm) Feet Metres N/M I GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 FILL - silty sandlsandy silt with organics 0.7 1 0.5 _(Topsoil) 00 00 FILL - probable concrete rubble, excessive auger grinding 2 3 1.0 4 1.5 FILL - dark brown sandy silt, trace brick 6 fragments, organics 1 100 12 9-10-9 19 D - 2.0 7 8 2.5 2 100 11 11-13-14 27 9 10 3.0 PVC pipe fragments at 10 ft to 11.5 ft 11 _ 3 75 12 12-18-21 39 3.5 12 13 4.0 14 15 - 4.5 hard augering belpw 15 ft depth 16 4 0 5012" R 5.0 17 18 - 5.5 19 6.0 RFFFRFNr;F No_: 038806-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A4 BOREHOLE No.: BH4 BOREHOLE REPORT. CRA Engineering Inc. VELEVATION: N/M ft Page: 2 of 2 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Geotechnlcal Investigation - Proposed CWm Service Center ®SS -SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way. Washington ®. ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Bruce Polan CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): March 18, 2006 DATE (FINISH): March 18. 2005 o a N Shear test (Cu) G Field SenstWlty(S) Lab L m > I° rn DESCRIPTION OF a) E > ,- C BIOWS per 6 In. / x L° m y c O Water content (%) � o N SOIL AND BEDROCK U7 TZ m .�+ 0 15 cm 0 Atterherg Ilmlls (%) w-n'k� w N F- ,� a0i rL 0 "N" Value (blows 112 In.-30 cm) Feet Metres N/M GROUND SURFACE _ % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90 SAND - brown, fine to medium grained, ..} {}' <h; some gravel, damp 5 100 4 7-9-16 25 O 21 - - 6.5 =r' 22 223D 7.0;• �? SAND AND GRAVEL - brown, very +- dense, occasional cobbles, dry to damp 24 i•:1►.w 7.5 *+x4 �} . 25 c 6 100 6 17-35-38 73 O 26+' 8.0 26 5 End of Borehole BH4 at 26.5 ft depth 27 - below existing ground level. Borehole open and dry upon completion. 28 8.5 Borehole backfilled with bentonite chips to 3 ft depth from ground surface. Top 3 ft backfilled with drill cuttings. 29 9.0 NIM denotes Not Measured. - 30 31 9.5 32 33 10.0 34 10.5 35 36 11.Q 37 11.5 36 39 12.0 REFERENCE No.: 03BB06-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A5 CRA Engineering Inc. g BOREHOLE No.: BH5 ELEVATION: N/M ft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 1 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Gootechnical Investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center ® SS = SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 340DI Pacific Hig_hway_South, Federal Way. Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Bruce Polan CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): " March 18, 2005 DATE (FINISH): March 18, 2005 r a rj L- o C m DESCRIPTION OF w " SOIL AND BEDROCK co m 2 m E �Z ~ > 3 .. u) r- Blows per 6 in. / 15 cm � .2 x 0 "' � C .S ilL Sheartestpu) A Field Sensitivity (S) 0 Lab O Water content w-p W, Aiterberg limits (/o) 0 `N' Value (blows 112 In: 30 cm) Feet Metres NIM GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 FILL - silty sand/sandy silt with organics (Topsoil) 110 FILL -gray sandy silt with clay, trace to 0.5 some concrete and brick fragments 2 3 1.0 1 100 24 3-5-5 10 11 O 4 5 1.5 6 2 100 14 3-4-5 9 4 O 6.5 2.0 End of Borehole BH5 at 6.5 ft depth 7 below existing ground level. Borehole open and dry upon completion. 8 2.5 Borehole backfilled with bentonite chips to 3 ft depth from ground surface. Top 3 9 ft backlilled with drill cuttings. N/M denotes Not Measured. 10 3.0 11 3.5 12 13 4.0 14 15 4.5 16 5.0 17 18 5.5 19 6.0 occcockirlC Ain w nRRRAr1i_n7 ENCLOSURE No.: A6 CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH6 ELEVATION: N/M ft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 1 CLIENT: Progressive Casual Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center ® SS - SPLIT SPOON _ LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal_ Way,_ Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Bruce Polan CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): March 18, 2005 DATE (FINISH): March 18 2005 _ r o w a a E rn DESCRIPTION OF SOIL AND BEDROCK qy B N E z' N > .� m L c V 81oWs per 6 Irt. / 15 cm c x at m g C —wow, EL Shear test (Cu) A Field Sensitivity (S) 0 Lab O Water content(%) H Atler6erg limits (%) 0 "N" Value (blows ! 12 In: 30 cm) Feet Metresl N!M GROUND SURFACE N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 FILL - silty sane' sandy silt with organics (Topsoil) 110 FILL - gray sand, fine to medium 0.5 grained, some silt and gravel, moist 2 - 3 1.0 1 100 13 11-13-16 31 O 1 4 5 1.5 2 100 11 7-12-13 25 0 6 6.5 2.0 End of Borehole BH6 at 6.5 ft depth 7 below existing ground level. Borehole open and dry upon completion. e 2.5 Borehole backfilled with bentonite chips to 3 ft depth from ground surface. Top 3 9 ft backfilled with drill cuttings. N!M denotes Not Measured. 10 3.0 11 3.5 12 13 4.0 14 15 4.5 16 5.0 17 18 5.5 19 6.0 REFERENCE No.: 038505-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A7 CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH101 �"- ELEVATION: NIM ft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 2 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Geatechnlcal Invasti ation - Proposed Claim Service Center _ ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Paalc Hlqhway Svulh Federal, Way, Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilanl - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): _ April 21, 2005 _ DATE (FINISH): April 21. 2005 >, r c a g m DESCRIPTION OF SOIL AND BEDROCK w 2 �' m a M Z N a $ _ w B o 0 ;� U Blows of P 5nCM c G k L° W S ) Shear test (Cu) A Fleld Sensitivity (S) ❑ Lab O Water contonl (%) wH� artarberg limps (%) ® ^N' Value (blows / 12 In: 30 cm) Feet Metres N/M GROUND SURFACE % N 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 FILL - gray fine sand with silt, trace gravel, organics, moist 1 0.6 2 3 1.0 4 5 1.5 brick fragments, wood chips 6 1 BB 12 B-9-10 19 ) 2.0 7 - B 2.5 9 10 3.0 11 - 2 100 9 B-11-22 33 r 3.5 12 i 13 — 4.0 i 14 4.5 1151) FILL. - brown sand and gravel, trace to some silt, trace organics 16 3 12 11-73-13 26 ) 5.0 17 18 5.5 19 6.0 REFERENCE No.: 038806.02 ENCLOSURE No,: A7 BOREHOLE No.: BH101 BOREHOLE REPORT CRA Engineering Inc. ELEVATION: NIM ft Page: 2 of 2 CLIENT: _ Progressive _Casuaity_Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Geatechnlcal_I_nvestlgatlon - Proposed Claim Service Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Hi byg South Federal Way, Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY. Hassan Mani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): �Apri121, 2005 DATE (FINISH): Aril 21.2005 r 2 a a� - N m B c IBIowS Bt P x Shear test (Cu) A Field Sensitivity (S) ❑Lab DESCRIPTION OF to 113 3 n. j9 m O Water content (%) H� Atterberg limits o w SOIL AND BEDROCK �Z U—ww 5i cm (%) v) F- � a • "N" Value (blows 112 In: 30 cm) Feet Metresl NIM I GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 N-!!:. SAND AND GRAVEL - brown, very dense, interbedddd sand seams, dry to damp 4 100 3 10-26-30 56 +D 21 6.5 22 z} 23 7.0 .�r > 24. tom•. 7.5~ 25st a*► 5 76 2 20-33-38 71 7 1 26 8.0 a( r 27 28 8.5 29, �. 9.0 r} 30,E 6 55 9 38-5015" R 9.5 End of Borehole BH101 at 30.9 ft depth below existing ground level. Borehole open and dry upon completion. 32 Borehole backfllled with bontonite chips j 33 10.0 to 3 ft depth from ground surface. Top 3 ft backiilled with drill cuttings. N%M denotes Notimeasured. 50/5" denotes 50!blows per 5 Inch 10 penetrataion. 35 R denotes Refusal; 36 11.0 37 11. 38 39 12.0 REFERENCE No.: 03B806-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A8 CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH102 ELEVATION: N/M ft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 3 CLIENT:.. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company _ LEGEND Gectechnicai Irsvostr atdan - Proposed Claim Service Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, Washington _ ® ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC -ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): April 20, 2005 DATE (FINISH): April 20, 2005 t c a DESCRIPTION OF w SOIL AND BEDROCK u� q� E 05 >aZ F— N ? aa) `1 c y c 0 a BIOWS er 6 in.J 15 CM d K g � y 5 a Shear test (Cu) A Field Sensitivity (S) O Lab 10...1 Water content(%) wF sir, Atterberg Ilmlls (/o) 0 "N" Value (blows 112 In: 30 cm) Feet Metres N/M I GROUND SURFACE I % I N 10 20 30 40 50 80 70 80 90 FILL -gray fine sand will) silt, [race gravel, organics,,moist 1 0.5 2 3 1.0 4 5 1.5 6 1 88 16 2-4-4 8 O 2.0 7 8 - 2.5 9 10 3.0 11 2 100 16 1-3-3 6 O 3.5 12 13 4.0 14 110 4.5 FILL - brown sarid and gravel, trace to 16 some silt, some woad fragments 3 100 20 1410 8 18 4I 5.0 17 19 6.0 REFERENCE No.: 038846-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A8 BOREHOLE No.: BH102 BOREHOLE REPORT CRA Engineering Inc. ELEVATION: N/M ft Page: 2 of 3 I CLIENT: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT:— Geotechnical Investigatlon - Proposed Claim Service Center �•_ ® SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Hi hwa E South. Federal Way, Washington ®ST - SHELBY TUBE f m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): Aprf120, 2005 DATE (FINISH): Aph1 20, 2005 _ T a m c a`� c Blows per c G Shear test (Cu) A Field Sensitivity (S) ❑ Lab m > B DESCRIPTION OF $Dil AJC] BEDROCK m.0 @ N E ' 3 �, N e 6 in. / axi o c O Wa€ermntent(%) u•.L A€lerber SEmils 0 ( ) p w �Z v 15 cm m w ••E U2 0_ "N' Value (blows 112 In: 30 cm) Feet Metres NIM GROUFJD SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 °= SAND - brown, medium dense, fine to f medium grained! trace to some silt trace 21 gravel, moist 4 100 11 3-5-6 11 111 6.5 H 22 23 7.0 24 =}- 7.5 }•`•: 21233 SANDY SILT - light brown, medium dense, moist•wat 5 100 26 5-5.6 11 1011 26 8.0 27 28 8.5 29 9.0 3l SAND - brown, medium dense, fine to medium grained, to some silt trace 31 gravel, moist 6 100 16 6-9-9 18 9.5 :pr 32 :N 10.0 r =;F:S >^ i J 33 ^i loose, wet 7 100 32 4-4-4 8 36 11 37 <•� ••: :z 38 39 12.0 } REFERENCE No.: ENCLOSURE No.: A8 BOREHOLE No.: BH102 BOREHOLE REPORT 6) CRA Engineering Inc. ELEVATION: i�r�w , Page: 3 Of 3 CLIENT: Progressive Casual insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Geotachnical Investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center _ _ ® SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION:. 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, Washington ®ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY: Hassan Gllani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): April20, 2005 DATE (FINISH): April 20, 2005 s ) `' m Blows - o x Shear lest (Cu) A Feld sensitivity (s) ❑Lab g ;�.. �' DESCRIPTION OF m `� �.. per m O-.� Water content (%) 1 SOIL AND BEDROCK a a "o 0 15t Cr l c v�i uric Atterberg limits u l Z ,� U 11 "N" Value (blows / 12 In: 30 cm) Feet Metres NIM GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 e0 90 . ' *2; SAND AND GRAVEL - brawn, very dense, Interbedded sand seams, dry to 8 100 10 10-31-36 67 41 12. damp 42 ca 43 44w' ! 13. : '** 45 9 88 4 25-25-31 56 O 4614. �s 47h" s "*a 14. ��- 4B *'+ #y; 49 15A' 50 : T 10 1 50 7 38-5011" R O 50.6 15 End of Borehole BH102 at 50.6 ft depth 51below existing ground level. Borehole open and dry updn completion. 52 Borehole backfilled with bentonite chips 16.0 to 3 ft depth fmm;gmund surface. Top 3 53 ft backfilled with drill cuttings. NIM denotes Notaisasured. 54 50I1" denotes 50!blows per 1 Inch 16.1 penevataion. R denotes Refusal. 55 17. 56 57 17.5 58 59 1 B.0 REFERENCE No: 038806-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A9 CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH103 ELEVATION:N/M ft _ BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 3 CLIENT: _ Progressive Casyal!y Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Ceolechnical Investigation - Proposed Claim Servlce Center ® SS -SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way, Washington ® ST - SHELBY.TUBE - m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): Apri120, 2005 DATE (FINISH): April 20.2005 t c a Lu DESgR,IPTION OF o w SOIL AND BEDROCK 00 c a`) mCU aZ F- y m c ci Blows per 6 in.% 15 Cm c ' N c AIL Shear test (Cu) G Fleld n Water(content ^/, Lab ( ) wH Atterberg limits (%) 0 "N" Value (blows / 12 In: 30 cm) Feet Metresi NIM I GROL"D SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 60 60 70 60 90 FILL - grey fine Land with slit, trace gravel, organics,!mnist 1 0.5 2 3 1.0 4 5 1.5 6 — 1 100 17 34-3 7 O 2.0 7 8 2.5 9 — 10 3.0 11 2 100 19 0-0-1 1 3.5 12 13 - 4.0 14 1�D 4.5 FILL - gray-browh silty sand, trace to some clay, trace organics 16 3 100 18 15 17 19 36 5.0 17 1 r 5.5 auger grinding on_ asphalt debris from 18 ft to 20 ft depth 19 6.0 REFERENCE emms 2 ENCLOSURENo BOREHOLE No: BH 0 BOREHOLE REPORT i � CRA Engineering |nc! : ELEVATION: mma . Page: 2 of 3 CLIENT: Progressive C2SUalty Insuram Company LEGEND PROJECT: . Geaamm,n ekn.ProposedC�b Service Center �s -pLT� poo LOCATION: 34001mm2 Highway South, ++d Way, Washington -RHEA TUBE CE RC -ROCKCORE DESCRIBED BY. SIeBeaton CHECKED BY: Hasnga z-WATER LEVEL vt(START): A%%G�Qo$. 3 DATE (FINISH): km2m2005 # ^ cc ± ems g Blows per ■moo Sheartest Ua■ »«k77 ML \ fF DESCRIPTION OF SOILED BEDROCK £ eE m ' § -2 -t Bin1 � £ Water _� w� m� a� & Qjf 2 f 22 R 15c ,W. I e'v_(bl_/2Ra arn) Feet Metre! AM GROUND SUAE % N 10 2 e## e 2 e e . RL-6@brown,-silty fie sand, trace gravel,#2 6¥% m,« 4 1m 9 7-5-7 g ,c 2, 6.5 2 . 23 70 - 24 75 , ZIED A s -grey-brown, medium dense, *e grained, _B S s 12 2 17-15-14 29 2 80 kƒ . £ 7ƒ . 2 _ B5 29 q% k0 7/ 3./ . B eo 2 3-5- 14 31 95 / 3 33 1�0 �34 10. *1 SAND AND GRAY�L.brown, very \ dense, ir ak sand seams, dry to f 100 B 15-28-23 51 36 1�$ - damp - . % Nov 3 \ m, S 39 {� ! 12.0 »� : � ±£ REFERENCE No.: 038806-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A9 BOREHOLE No.: BH103 BOREHOLE REPORT A) CRA Engineering Inc. ELEVATION: N/M ft Page: 3 of 3 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Gooterhnical Investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center _ ® SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Hlahway South, Federal Way. Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaten CHECKED BY: Hassan Gllani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): April 20, 2005 DATE (FINISH): April 20, 2005 s o a tv ` aa) N m Blows per e o x Shear test (Cu) A Field Sensitivity (S) ❑Lab B rn DESCRIPTION OF m d E > »- .. c 6 Irl. / d ru O Water content (%) H SOIL AN BEDROCK 6) a 3 a) ,y 'o C 15 cm c — Atterberg limits (°%) w,A w co Z U 0- 0 "N" Value (blows 112 In: 30 cm) Feet Metres N/M GROUND SURFACE % ' N 10 20 30 40 60 60 70 80 90 41 i 8 78 3 20-28-31 59 1-0 12.5'*; •1�•. 42- 13.0 is 43' fiy�h M 44 — 13. 45 '+! :ii►�4 i 9 67 4 20-25-42 67 O 46 47 }•:,�.. 14. 48 49 + 50 !; t r� + ! 10 50 6 31-33-39 72 O 51^ 51.5 �`�-� End of Borehole BH103 at 51.5 ft depth 52 below existing ground level. Borehole i 1 fi 0 open and dry upon completion. 53 Borehole backfilled with bentonile chips to 3 ft depth from;ground surface. Top 3 ft baceiilled with drill cuttings. 54 1 ii.5 NIM denotes Not:measured. 55 17.0 56 57 17. 58 59 18.0 REFERENCE No.: 038BOB-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A10 A) CRA Engineering inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH104 ELEVATION: N/M ft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 2 CLIENT: _ Progressive Casualty Insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - Prnposed Claim Service Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Paelfic Highway South, Federal Way, Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): April 21, 2005 DATE (FINISH): April 21. 2005 o o } i✓ „ ul a 2 0 � DESCRIPTION OF SOIL AND BEDROCK m t9 2 N E Cl) T M F' 8 c, er .N c BIOWS @r P 6 in. / 15 cm '� x a> � � — 1L Shear test (Cu) A Field Sensitivity (S) ❑ lab O Water content (%) H Atterberg limits (%) w,w, ® "N" Value (blows / 121n: 30 cm) Feet Metresl N!M GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 FILL - gray fine sand with silt, trace gravel, organics,; moist 1 - 0.5 2 3 1.0 4 5 1.5 1 100 18 5-" 16 6 2.0 7 B 2.5 auger grinding on probable construction debris fTam 9 ft depth to 13 ft depth 10 - 3.0 some brick fragments 2 78 14 15.16-20 36 O 11 3.5 12 183D 4.0 14 1 4.5 FILL - brown sarid and gravel, trace to some silt, trace asphalt fragments 3 100 11 11-11-9 20 ) 16 5.0 17 18 5.5 19 - 6.0 RFFFRFNCE No.: 038806-02 ENCLOSURE No.: AID BOREHOLE No.: BH104 BOREHOLE REPORT CRA Engineering Inc. ELEVATION: _ _ _ NIM ft — Page: 2 of 2 CLIENT: PLoAressive Casualty insurance Company LEGEND PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Parific_HI hwa W South, Federal a Washington ®ST-SHELBYTUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton ' _ CHECKED BY: Hassan Mani - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): April 21, 2005 DATE (FINISH): April 21. 2005 i f o Q w m Blows per c •° x Shear test (Cu) A Field Sensitivity (S) ❑ Lab L a Is DESCRIPTION OF SOIL At+IC3 BEDROCK � a) E c m w c 6 in. / T a)1p-1 s w&ter cnnlent (%) Atterberg limits (/°) ul us aZ re v 15 cm r C- w" , 0 'N' Value (blows / 12 In.-30 cm) Feel Metres NIM GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 60 60 70 80 90 SAND - brown, medium dense, fine to 20.5 medium grained,itraee to some silt, trace ravel moist = 4 88 6 2-34-29 63 O 21 - 6.5 Y°e � 1 *; SAND A14D GRAVEL - brown, very I dense, interbedded sand seams, dry to 22 1l+�� damp - 23 7.0 24 •, - 7.5 t't�•� 25 ,. F# 5 78 3 19-25-27 52 O 26 8.0 '* +' f: ::.s:c 27 '�''t` F 28 8.5 i 29 r+' 9.0 30 'y ' 6 65 6 38-31-37 68 O 31 9.5 ' 31.5 .+ End of Borehole SH104 at 31.5 ft depth 32 below existing ground level. Borehole open and dry upoli completion. 33 Borehole hacKfi]led with bentanite chips to 3 R depth from ground surface. Top 3 R backfilled with 411 cuttings. 34 10.5 NIM denotes Not measured. 35 36 11.0 37 11. 38 39 - 12.Q REFERENCE No.: 038806-02 ENCLOSURE No.: A11 CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: _ BH105 ELEVATION: N/M ft BOREHOLE REPORT Page: 1 of 3 CLIENT: Pra ressive Casualty Insurance Company _ LEGEND PROJECT: Geetaahnlcal Investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Hi hwa South. Federal Way. Washington ®ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilanl -WATER LEVEL DATE (START): A rll 20 2005 DATE (FINISH): Aoril 20.2005 t w o c i w n B m to DESCRIPTION OF SOIL AtjlD BEDROCK m r W 1°� a) E rn ,Z F- N 0 m m e 3 aP N c U Blows ei 6 in. / 15 cm e '9 x Ems,° a> a� � — 0_ Shear test (Cu) AField Sensitivity (S) ❑ Lob O Water content(%) Atterberg limits (%) w�v� 0 "N' Value (blows / 12 In: 30 cm) Feet Metre N/M GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 FILL - gray fine s�nd with silt, trace gravel, organics, .snolst 1 0.5 2 3 1.0 4 5 1.5 1 77 14 6-9-14 23 O 6 2.0 7 8 2.5 9 - 10 3.0 -- 2 100 13 12-20-19 39 .0 11 3.5 TF I I 12 13 4.0 14 4.5 FILL - brown sand and gravel, trace to some silt, some wood fragments 3 100 8 8-8-12 20 C 1 11 16 5.0 17- 18 5.5 19 - 6.0 REFERENL:E No.: ENCLOSURE No.: Al i CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH105 BOREHOLE REPORT - ELEVATION: N/M ft I Page: 2 of 3 CLIENT: E29ressive Casualty Insurance CompanyLEGEND PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Clalm Service Center ®5S -SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Highway South Federal Way, Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Sieve Beaton CHECKED BY: Hassan Gilanl - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): Aril 20 2005 DATE (FINISH): _April 20, 2005 M o n c a)y c BI<)WS e P X Shear test (Cu) A Field Sensilivity {S) ❑ Lab B o w DESCRIPTION OF SOIL AND BEDROCK a> "� a m d A a? - E d O Water content (°%) AtterbaM 11mi(s J%) 5 cm aci S w� w� E 10L. 0 "N" Value (blows 112 in -30 cm) Feet Metres NIM GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 ''`°' SAND - brown, medium dense, fine to r medium grained, trace to some silt, trace 21 ? gravel, moist 4 100 15 7 4 3 9 O 6.5 i 22Y:i 23 7.0 24 t=. 7.5 255 spoon bouncing on a probable 10 10 5013" R boulder/cobble 26 >;t 8.0 2728 {:>s 8.5 '= } 29 :`•ir 9.0 :y { ^Wyf f:%[Ty 1 SAND AND GRAVEL - brawn, very dense, interbedded sand seams, dry to S1 ; damp i 6 55 6 21-38-39 77 O 9.5 32 10. - E 33 " *r4 34 4 35 '•,t 7 100 5 40-50/3" R O 36 37 *4{ 38 39 ? N 12. REFERENCE No.: ENCLOSURE No.: All I CRA Engineering Inc. I BOREHOLE No.: BH105 j BOREHOLE REPORT ELEVATION: N/M ft Page: 3 of 3 CLIENT: Pro resslve Casualty Insurance Company PROJECT: Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Claim Service Center LOCATION:: 34001 Pacific Highway South Federal Way, Washin ton DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY. Hassan Gilani DATE (START): April 20.2005 DATE (FINISH): April 20.2005 LEGEND JOSS - SPLIT SPOON ® ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE - WATER LEVEL r r n B DESCRIPTION OF o w SOIL AND BEDROCK cn a` c (a 1d TZ m > .2:: Ln v IBIOWS er P 5 cm C c " a c lL Shear test (Cu) A Field Sensitivity (S) ❑ Lab O Water content (°h) wH� Atterbarg limits (%) ■ "N" Value (blows / 12 In: 30 cm) Feet Metre N/M GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1ti,.x! 41 12. *s.* 2 41.5 End of Borehole BH105 at 41.5 ft depth 6 10D 5 23-33- 4 77 O 42 below existing ground level. Borehole open and dry upon completion. � s.a 43 Borehole backfilled with bentonite chips to 3 ft depth from ground surface. Top 3 44 ft backfilled with dull cuttings. 1 S' NIM denotes Not measured. 45 50/3" denotes 50 blows per 3 inch penetrataion. R denotes Refusal. 46 14- 47 14. 46 49 15.0 50 51 15. 52 16. 53 54 16 55 56 17.0 57 17. 56 59 18.0 REFERENCE No.: ENCLOSURE No.: Al2 CPA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH106 BOREHOLE REPORT ELEVATION: N/M ft _ Page: 1 of 3 CLIENT: Progressive Casualty insurance Company _ LEGEND PROJECT: Geatechnical Invest(gallon - Proposed Claim Service Center ® SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pacific Hlghwa� 5du_th_. Federal Way, Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE — m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton _ CHECKED -BY: Hassan Gllani ; - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): A M 21 2005 DATE (FINISH): _April 21, 2005 y L g a g DESCRIPTION OF m > o m SOIL AND BEDROCK w U) ` @ y E a Z a> $ a, 7 N c c 0 U Blows Per 6 In. / 15 Cm a p x = a� `� tL Shear test (Cu) A Fleld Sensitivity (S) ❑Lab O Water content (%) H Atterberg limits (h) wPw. ID "N" Value (blows / 12 •In: 30 cm) Feet Metres N/M GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 FILL - gray fine sand with silt, trace gravel, organics,.molst 1 0.5 2 3 1.0 4 — 5 1.5 1 100 — 5-6-7 13 1p 6 2.0 7 — t3 2.5 9 10 3.0 11 2 100 13 6-6-11 17 3.5 12 13 4.0 14 111� 4.5 FILL - brown sand and gravel, trace to some silt, some wood fragments 16 3 56 7 7-12-13 25 O r 5.0 1T 1 e 5.5 19 s.o REFERENCE No.: _ 03B80. 02 ENCLOSURE No.: Al2 6) CRA Engineering Inc. BOREHOLE No.: BH106 BOREHOLE REPORT ELEVATION: _ N/M ft Page: 2 of 3 CLIENT: P(g9ressive Casual Insurance ComLany LEGEND PROJECT: _ _ Geotechniral investigation - Proo2osed Claim Service Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Paclffc Hlghway South, Federal Way. Washinglon ® ST - SHELBY TUBE ' m RC -ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY: Hassan Giiani T -WATER LEVEL DATE (START): April 21, 2005 _ DATE (FINISH): _April 21, 2005 >. a °: Shear test (Cu) A Fleld c c o Sensitivliy (S) ❑Lab > Blows per x a > 9 DESCRIPTION OF SOIL AND BEDROCK v� m w ar E !� c CL o o 0 6 in. / OH avatar content (/o) c r Atterberfl lfmlts (%) u1 ~ Z U 15 cm w" Vy � co CL 0 'N' Value (blows / 12 In: 30 cm) Feet Metres N/M GROUND SURFACE % f N 1 10 20 30 40 5o 60 70 e0 90 FILL- dark brown sand, coarse garined. trace silt, moist 21 4 44 14 344 8 O 6.5 22 - 23 7.0 24 REFERENCE No.: 038806.02 ENCLOSURE No.: Al2 BOREHOLE No.: cizA Engineering Inc. BH106 BOREHOLE REPORT ELEVATION: N/M ft Page: 3 of 3 CLIENT: Progressive CasualInsurance CornpanV LEGEND PROJECT: Geotechnical Invasil scion - ProaLmed Claim Service Center ®SS - SPLIT SPOON LOCATION: 34001 Pach1c Hthway South Federal W§L Washington ® ST - SHELBY TUBE m RC - ROCK CORE DESCRIBED BY: Steve Beaton CHECKED BY: Hassan GUN - WATER LEVEL DATE (START): April 21, 2005 DATE (FINISH): April 21, 2005 a a Shear test (Cu) 0 Field c `- � y c DESCRIPTION OF m 2 c ro .0 3 Blows per Sensitivity (S) O Lab "—Loy O water content (��) o' W SOIL AND BEDROCK Z v 161 Cm c why Atterberg limits (°h) n. • "N" Value (blows / 12 In: 30 cm) Feet Metres N/M I GROUND SURFACE % N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 i 8 67 4 25-33-35 68 O 41 12.,w 42 r� 43 yak► 44 *. 46 14. 9 77 4 29-37-40 77 O 46.5 �' �} End of Borehole BH106 at 46.5 €i depth 47 below existing ground level. Borehole 14 open and dry upon completion. 48 Borehole backfilled with bentonite chips to 3 ft depth fromground surface. Top 3 49 ft backfilled with drill cuttings. 15.0 N/M denotes Not+measured. 50 50/3" denotes 50'blows per 3 inch penetrataion. R denotes Refusal. 51 15.5 52 [6. 53 v 6 a 54 16. N 55 x v 56 17.0 57 a 17.5 58 0 59 J 1 B. N Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. &MIX WETLAND. DELINEATION AND STREAM IDENTIFICATON SURVEY ki U-HAUL SITE Federal Way, Washington Prepared for: U-haul International Project No. KBO1111A August 24, 2001 Corporate Office • 911 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100 • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Phone 425 827-7701 • Fax 425 827-5424 West Sound Office • 179 Madrone Lane North • Bainbridge Island, -WA 98110 • Phone 206 780-9370 • Fax 206 780-9438 Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Survey U-HAUL SITE Federal Way, Washington Prepared for.- U-haul International 2727 North Central Avenue PO Box 2150Z- Phoenix, AZ. 85036-1502 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 5'h Avenue, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98033 August,24, 2001 Project No. KBO1111A I I' - Pe r Super Staff Biologist/Wetlands Ju 'th Light A ociate Biologist/Wetlands U-haul Site Federal Way, Washington Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION .................... ..... .1 3.0 METHODS ......... ........ 3.1 Literature Review .. � �.:........................................................................... 4 3.2 Wetland Delineation Survey.....................................................................4 ................................ 3.3 Stream Identification Survey ............. 4.0 SURVEY RESULTS................ ..�.5 ..................... .1 Literature Review.........................................:................ .. .........5 4.2 Survey Results ............................................. ............................... 6 ...... Overview............................................................... .......6 WetlandA ................. ............................................................... 6 StreamA .......... ............. ....................................................................... . Upland.................................................... 5.0 HABITAT FUNCTION AND VALUE ........................ 9 ............................... 5.1 Aquatic Habitats ...................... ................. 9 ............................................ 5.2 Upland Habitats ........... 6.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ........................... ........................................ 10 6.1 Local Regulations ........................... 7.0 SUMMARY........................................................................................... 11 8.0 REFERENCES........................................................... • ........ 12 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity Map ........................................... . Figure 2. Wetland and Stream Habitats ............ ............................3 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Project Site Photos Appendix B Wetland Delineation Datasheets Appendix C Definitions for Categories of Wetland Plant Indicators Appendix D Soils Information Appendix E Published Inventory Maps 1) National Wetlands Inventory Map (USFWS 1980) 2) City of Federal Way Wetland Inventory Map and Field Form 3) WDF (1975) Publication 4) King County Sensitive Areas Map Folio August 24, 2001 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. PPS/da - KB01111A1 -projects 120011111kbI%p - N2 Page i ... .. •__ . ... _ � -.,�; ' - :- . � _ : r'':.i; • ..l.•r; •--�; 1�.� tea!'- 122 M7S• w TN* IMN wom urmr d V "� !9' O faonP¢i a Doom Ppuwm ffva TOP01 Ci908 w"ildiScvvr Pmduniael (mvw.tapo.wa� g 3 N m Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 ® ® ® FEDERAL WAY U-HAUL DATE 8/01 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON PROJ. NO. KE01111G s I 1 I I l I I I 1 I I I� ff� I I I I 1 I n N------sa-w MZ"7" Cal uprfwm me 04 F�4-' KITTS CORNER REGIONAL'i" DETENTION FACILITY'I 6j LEGEND 1-1 P Wetland boundary flag SPA _ P Wetland sample plot Wetland boundary it oMn= Poo KNG COUNTY TAX ACCOUNT NO. 202104-9004 ZONED: M ESS-COMMUNITY �14�.1s• I y ( _ _ r i. , i i• 11r� ��� � I ii i i ` 3 }1 f �1 =i i �, ��, � , is 1 , i I ;► 1 � � r •'•L, •� i� l,� r ; t � 1 i 11 j i i tit ; ► 1 , , ; f a — — —22w�--' I I ■ I in I I it a o so saa rEcr REFERENCE: TRIAD ASSOCIATES, INC. - Assnaated Earth Sciences, Inc. FIGURE 2 0 WETLAND AND STREAM HABITATS U-HAUL SITE FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON DATE &01 PROJECT NO. KB01111A U-haul Site Federal Way, Washington Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION In January 2001, U-HAUL International (U-haul) retained Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) to conduct a wetland delineation and stream identification survey of an 8.27-acre parcel (hereafter referred to as the "project site") located at 34001 Pacific Highway South in Federal Way, Washington. As a result of a February 27, 2001 field effort, a wetland and stream complex part of the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility was identified within approximately the western third of the project site. Likewise, a constructed detention pond and associated constructed Swale were identified within the central portion of the project site. on - site development activities fall under the local jurisdiction of the City of Federal Way (Federal Way). Wetland and stream classification and buffer criteria applicable to the project site are based on the policies contained within Chapter 22, Article XIV, Environmentally Sensitive Areas of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). This report has been prepared in conformance with the criteria established under Chapter 22-1356(b) of the FWCC to provide a discussion of existing conditions within the project site and a summary of the wetland delineation and stream identification survey results conducted by AESI staff. 2.0 PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is located in the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, King County, W.M. within the upper third of the Hylebos Creek basin (Figure 1). The project site is bound by Pacific Highway South (State Route 99) to the east, undeveloped Parcels to the north, and commercial and light industrial businesses both to the west and south. The eastern and central portions of the project site generally slope at an approximate 2 percent grade to a constructed Swale located approximately 500 lineal feet west of Pacific Highway South which subsequently discharges to a surface water detention and/or erosion control facility generally located off -site to the north (Figure 2; Appendix A, Photo 1, Photo 2, and Photo 3). Immediately west of the Swale and surface water detention facility, topography within the project site transitions via a moderately steep constructed sloped area (approximately 30 percent) to the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility (Figure 2; Appendix A, Photo 4 and Photo 5). The constructed Swale and surface water detention facility discharge to the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility via a flow control structure and associated subsurface Piping. A single billboard located in the northeastern comer of the project site exists as the only above grade structure within the eastern and central portions of the project site. A gravel access road located off -site extends west from Pacific Highway South generally paralleling the northern property boundary before connecting to an on -site gravel access road located immediately west of the moderately steep constructed sloped area of the project site (Figure 2; Appendix A, Photo 6). The on -site gravel access road extends from the northern property boundary to the August 24, 2001 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. PPS/da - "01111A1 pmjecrs120011111kb1wp- W1 Page 1 U-haul Site Federal Way, Washington Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Report southern property boundary in generally a north/south orientation and then extends west approximately 250 lineal feet before continuing off -site to the south. Existing gravity sewer mains and associated appurtenances are located within the on -site gravel access road. The portion of the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility located within the project site consists of two large surface water flow conveyance attenuation and treatment cells. The eastern cell includes a constructed wetland and stream complex (Wetland A and Stream A, respectively) and extends off. -site to the north. The western cell contains one large open water treatment cell which extends off -site to the south. Within the project site, the eastern cell maintains a 36-inch diameter concrete culvert, which discharges into the western cell, and a 27-inch diameter concrete culvert, which discharges to a riparian corridor located off -site to the south. 3.0 METHODS 3.1 Literature Review As part of this wetland delineation and stream identification survey, the Soil Survey: King County Area, Washington (Snyder et al. 1973) and Hydric Soils of Washington State (U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA] 19$8) were referenced to gather previously documented information on soils present within the project site. Additionally, applicable wetland inventory maps such as the Federal Way wetland inventory maps and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) quadrangle map for the local area were referenced to determine the existence of previously identified wetlands within the project site. Likewise, the Washington State Department of Fisheries' (WDF 1975) A Catalogue of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization was referenced to determine the documented presence of stream habitats and historic fish use within the project site. 3.2 Wetland Delineation Survey The February wetland delineation survey was conducted using the methodologies defined in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Wetland Delineation Manual (COE Technical Report Y- 87-1) and the 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Sample plot locations and delineated wetland boundaries were flagged in the field and each marker was identified with the survey date and point reference. The delineated wetland boundaries were located and surveyed by a professional surveyor and the identified aquatic resources within the project area are presented on Figure 2 included in this report. Within the vicinity of the delineated wetland, plant species were identified and percent coverage per species was estimated in 5 percent increments for overstory, understory, and herbaceous layers within each non-random, 5-meter radius plot sampled during the survey. August 24, 2001 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. PPS/da - KB01111A1 projects 120011111kblwp- N2 Page 4 U-haul Site Federal Way, Washington Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Report Standard wetland delineation forms used to record the information collected at the sample plots are included in Appendix B of this report. Plant species were classified according to moisture tolerance and placed in one of the following categories: obligate wetland (OBL); facultative wetland (FACW); facultative (FAC); facultative upland (FACU); or obligate upland (UPL) (Appendix C). The National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed 1988) and Supplement to the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed 1993) were referenced to determine plant species indicator categories. If greater than 50 percent of the dominant plant species at a sample plot was OBL, FACW, or FAC, the vegetation was considered to be hydrophytic. Vegetation communities were classified according to the USFWS wetland classification system (Cowardin et al. 1979). In addition to vegetation, information on soils and hydrology was also collected during the wetland delineation survey. Soils were inspected at each sample plot and along the delineated wetland boundaries in hand -dug soil pits 15 to 20 inches deep. At each sample plot, soil texture, matrix color, presence of mottles or gleymg, and saturation levels were recorded. Soil and mottle colors were determined through the use of the Munsell Soil Color Charts (GretagMacbeth 1998). Additionally, hydrologic indicators, including drainage patterns, presence of surface water, depth of ground water, and evidence of inundation (i.e., drift lines, water marks, oxidized root zones, etc.) were also noted at each sample plot. The soils and hydrology information collected at each sample plot is also presented on the standard wetland delineation datasheets (Appendix B). Locations of recorded sample plots are provided on Figure 2 of this report. 3.3 Stream Identification Survey The February stream identification survey assessed the project site for potential aquatic habitats satisfying the criteria for regulated streams established in Chapter 22, Article XIV, Environmentally Sensitive Areas of the FWCC. General habitat characteristics of identified stream habitats were noted; however, no electrofishing or other methods to determine the presence or absence of fisheries resources were utilized during the field effort. 4.0 SURVEY RESULTS 4.1 Literature Review The Poverty Bay Quadrangle of the Soil Survey: King County Area, Washington (Snyder et al. 1973) identifies the occurrence of a narrow band of Norma sandy loam (No) surrounded by Everett-Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes (EwC) within the project site. Norma soil associations are classified as hydric (wetland) and Everett-Alderwood soil associations are classified as non-hydric (non -wetland) by the USDA (1988). Complete soil descriptions and soil survey maps for the project site are presented in Appendix D of this document. August 24, 2001 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. PPS/da - KB01111A1 -projects 12001111lkblwp- W2 Page 5 U-haul Site Federal Wgy, Washington Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Report The NWI - Poverty Bay Quadrangle (USFWS 1980) identifies small palustrine, aquatic bed, permanently flooded and riverine, aquatic bed, permanently flooded wetland habitats occurring within or immediately adjacent to the project site. Federal Way identifies the presence of one palustrine scrub -shrub wetland (Federal Way Wetland No. 20-21-04-84) and one stream (West Branch of Hylebos Creek) within the project site. Federal Way documents the identified wetland as a "created WL [wetland] with numerous hydrologic modifications - standpipes, etc.". Copies of the NWI map and Federal Way wetland inventory maps/field forms applicable to previously documented aquatic resources within the project site are included within Appendix E of this document. Stream A exists within the Hylebos Creek drainage of [Water Resource Inventory Area] (WRIA) 10, Lower Puyallup River Basin. The presence of stream habitats within the project site is not noted in A Catalogue of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Volume I (WDF 1975). However, the King County Sensitive Areas Map Folio (SAMF; 1990) identifies -- the presence of one Class 2 stream (with salmonids) within the immediate vicinity of the project site. This stream is identified as unclassified within the project site and splits into two streams immediately upstream of the project site. The WDF (1975) publication identifies the historic use of Hylebos Creek (WRIA 10-0006) by coho salmon (Onchorhynchus kitsutch) and chum salmon (Onchorhynchus keta). Copies of the WDF publication and the King County SAMF are also presented in Appendix E of this report. 4.2 Survey Results Overview A palustrine emergent, palustrine scrub -shrub, and palustrine open water wetland complex (Wetland A - City of Federal Way Wetland No. 20-21-04-84) and one stream (Stream A - West Branch Hylebos Creek) were identified in portions of the eastern cell of the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility located within the project site (Figure 2; Appendix A, Photo 7). Stream A drains from the north and enters the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility via surface water collection and conveyance facilities, then subsequently flows through Wetland A in a heavily modified channel (Figure 2; Appendix A, Photo 8 and Photo 9). In addition, a surface water detention pond and associated swale were identified within the central portions of the project site; however, because of their artificially constructed nature in upland soils, these facilities were not documented as aquatic resources (Figure 2). Wetland A Vegetation Dominant woody vegetation observed within the documented portion of Wetland A includes red -osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) and red alder (Alnus rubra). Locally abundant woody vegetation observed within open water components of the wetland includes willow (Salix spp.). August 24, 2001 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. PPS/da - "0/11 /A/ projects120011 H ft I wp- N2 Page 6 U-haul Site Federal Way, Washington Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Report Dominant herbaceous species observed within the documented portion of Wetland A include soft rush (Juncus effusus), sedge (Carex sp.), narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), common velvetgrass (Holcus lanatus), and orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata). Other locally abundant herbaceous species observed include reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) and small -fruited bulrush (Scirpus microcarpus). Observed species density and distribution are consistent with those expected of constructed wetlands (e.g., closely clumped individuals of similar species at non-random spacings, etc.). Soil Soil matrix colors observed within excavated pits of the documented portion of Wetland A were generally very dark gray (10YR 3/1) to dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) to grayish brown (10YR 5/2) to brown (10YR 5/3) on the Munsell Soil Color Charts (GretagMacbeth 1998). Soil textures ranged from sandy loam to sand with a variable gravel component in all excavated pits. Hydrology Indicators of wetland hydrology observed within the wetland include open water, free-standing water at 16.5 inches from the soil surface in excavated soil pits, surfacial saturation of soils, oxidized live root zones, and soil concretions (reddish brown [5YR 4/6] on the Munsell Soil Color Charts [GretagMacbeth 1998]). Seasonal shallow ground water, overland flows associated with Stream A, and direct precipitation exist as the major hydrologic sources supporting this wetland. However, because Wetland A is part of the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility, the hydroperiod of Wetland A is strongly influenced by the flow collection, detention, and conveyance properties of the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility. Stream A As a result of the February 27, 2001 field effort, one intermittent stream (Stream A - West Branch Hylebos Creek) was identified within the project site. Stream A enters the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility approximately 200 lineal feet north of the project site via a large concrete flume structure, stormwater manhole, and a 24-inch diameter concrete culvert. During the field effort, less than approximately 2 cubic feet per second (cfs) was observed flowing into the upstream end of the 24-inch diameter concrete culvert. No flow was observed entering the large concrete flume. Riparian habitats observed upstream of the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility consist of a young deciduous forest dominated by Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra), red alder, and red - osier dogwood (Appendix A, Photo 10). A mixed -aged stand of Douglas fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii), western redcedar (Thuja plicata), red alder, and bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) and a mature even -aged stand of Douglas fir were documented to the east and west, respectively, of the off -site Stream A riparian corridor located to the north of the project site. August 24, 2001 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. PPS/da - KBO1111A1 projects120011111kblwp- W2 Page 7 U-haul Site Federal Way, Washington Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Report Upon entering the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility, Stream A flows through Wetland A in a constructed stream channel. At the time of survey, -the wetted width of the documented portion of Stream A ranged from approximately 6 feet to 15 feet wide. Stream A maintained a depth of standing water ranging from 5 inches to 3 feet deep. Streambed substrate consisted primarily of silts and sands underlain by an unknown compacted fill material. Instream cover within the project site was variable, with cover consisting primarily of overhanging vegetation estimated to provide approximately less than 5 percent to 80 percent coverage during the growing season. When present, overhanging vegetation consisted of primarily young red alder, willow, soft rush, and small -fruited bulrush. Within the project site one log weir was documented within Stream A (Appendix A, Photo 9). Less than 1 cfs was observed passing over the weir and approximately 10 lineal feet of quarry spall rock within the channel of Stream A was exposed immediately downstream of the observed weir. An additional weir was documented within Stream A immediately north of the project site Stream A flows from the palustrine open water component of Wetland A via a 36-inch diameter concrete culvert and a 27-inch diameter concrete culvert. The 36-inch diameter concrete culvert discharges into the large western treatment cell of the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility. The 27-inch diameter concrete culvert discharges off -site into what appears to be the original stream channel of Stream A. On the day of the site visit, standing water was observed within the 36-inch diameter concrete culvert; however, the invert elevation of the 27- inch diameter concrete culvert existed above the observed water surface elevation of the open water component. In addition, a steel plug has been installed in the 27-inch diameter concrete culvert to prevent surface water from flowing to downstream habitats via the 27-inch diameter culvert. The western treatment cell of the Kitts Comer Stormwater Detention Facility discharges off site via a 5-foot diameter concrete culvert to what appears to be the original channel of Stream A (located approximately 150 lineal feet south of the project site). Sparse mature black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) and moderately dense pole size red alder occupy forested riparian habitats of Stream A downstream of project site (Appendix A, Photo 11) Upland Upland habitats of the project site generally include the constructed sloped areas of the project site adjacent to Wetland A, gravel access roads within the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility, and the relatively flat central and eastern portions of the project site. Locally abundant species observed in upland areas immediately adjacent to Wetland A include young red alder, Pacific ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus), orchardgrass, bentgrass (Agrostis spp.), redtop (Agrostis gigantea), and fescue (Festuca spp.). Soils observed within excavated pits adjacent to Wetland A were generally dark yellowish brown (10YR 3/4, 10YR 3/6) to brown (10YR 5/3) to pale brown (10YR 6/3) sandy loam to sands with a variable gravel component. Standing water and/or other indicators of wetland hydrology were not observed within soil pits excavated in areas that were determined to support upland habitats. August 24, 2001 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. PPS/da - KB01111A1 -projects 12001111lkblwp- W2 Page 8 U-haul Site Federal Way, Washington Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Report Soils observed within excavated pits of the constructed swale were generally grayish brown (10YR 5/2) to light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) to light gray (10YR 7/2) to very pale brown (10YR 7/3) sands with a variable gravel component. Standing water and/or indicators of wetland hydrology were not observed in excavated pits of the constructed swale; however, standing water was observed within the detention pond to a maximum depth of 2 feet. Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius) and grass communities typical of disturbed upland habitats (i.e., Agrostis spp., Lolium spp. Festuca spp., etc.) were observed within the swale and areas surrounding the detention pond. Young Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis) and Pacific willow were observed in the detention pond. 5.0 HABITAT FUNCTION AND VALUE 5.1 Aquatic Habitats Documented portions of Wetland A and Stream A exist as highly modified aquatic resources in terms of habitat structure as well as species diversity and richness. While many of the herbaceous and shrub species present within the wetland displayed robust vegetative characteristics, species density (i.e., low to moderate), and distribution (i.e., nonrandom spacing of individuals of similar species) within Wetland A are characteristic of anthropogenic origins. The presence of robust vegetative characteristics also indicates the presence of adequate hydrologic and nutrient sources within the wetland. However, as Wetland A and Stream A exist within an eastern cell of the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility, hydrology and water quality are controlled by the inflow water quality and the flow collection, detention, and conveyance properties of the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility. As Wetland A and Stream A are within the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility; surface water control, as well as pollution and erosion control properties, with regard to downstream aquatic habitats is good to excellent. Avian use of Wetland A within the project site would be rated as high. On the day of the site visit, American robin (Turdus migratorius), bufflehead (Bucephala albeola), gulls (Larus sp.), Canada geese (Branta canadensis), mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), and belted kingfisher (Ceryle alctyon) were observed in portions of Wetland A located primarily within the western treatment cell of the Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility. Other fish or wildlife use of Wetland A and/or Stream A, either through direct observation or indicators of presence (i.e., scat, nests, redds, etc.), within or adjacent to Wetland A and/or Stream A were not observed. Fish utilization within documented portions of Stream A is likely limited by the modified hydrology of the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility and probable migrational barriers presented by the inlet and outlet structures of the detention facility. August 24, 2001 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. PPS/da - KBOMMAI projects 120011111kblwp- Va Page 9 U-haul Site Federal Way, Washington Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Report 5.2 Upland Habitats Stream and wetland buffer areas within the project site have been highly modified due to historic anthropocentric disturbance activities. Buffer areas adjacent to the eastern edge of Wetland A consist of a gravel road, steep sloped area, and flat plateau area of the central project site. Although, a small quantity oth�easternvegetation boundary of Wetland Aebb buffer habk, red itats etc.) is located immediately adjacent to support primarily grass communities within the steep sloped areas and dense to patchy stands of Scotch broom within the central and eastern portions of the project site. Buffer habitat characteristics provide limited cover, refuge areas, and food sources for native wildlife species. Likewise, detrial and nutrient input potential as well as shade capabilities provided by buffer areas with respect to the adjacent aquatic environments is severely limited. 6.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW 6.1 Local Regulations Under FWCC, Wetland A would be classified as a Category 11 wetland (FWCC Chapter 22- 1357[a][21). Wetland A, in its entirety, is greater than 1 acre in size and maintains two wetland classes with neither class dominated by non-native invasive species. The Federal Way wetland inventory field form for Wetland No. 20-21-04-84 (Appendix F) supports this wetland categorization. Structures, improvements, and land surface modifications are permittedthe Fi� regulated wetlands pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22-1358. Chapter 22-1357(b)( ) requires the establishment of a standard buffer of Ofrom 22 1359(b) and wetlands.ategory H tland buffer buffer averaging may occur pursuant to FWCCChapter reductions may occur pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22-1359(d). Likewise, installation of essential public facilities, public utilities, and other public improvements may occur within wetland buffers pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22-1359(c). Drainage facilities (i.e., surface water ponds, drainage ditches, etc.) that are designed to impound or convey water for engineered purpose are not considered regulated wetlands under FWCC Chapter 22-1356 if the following conditions apply: 1) such facilities are human created; 2) such facilities are constructed in uplands; 3) such facilities are actively operated; 4) wetland conditions have not expanded beyond the originally constructed facility; and 5) such facilities were not designed or constructed as a requirement to mitigate previous wetland impacts. Under FWCC, Stream A would be classified as a major stream (FWCC Chapter 22-1). While the presence or absence of fisheries within portions of Stream A located within the project site was not been determined by AESI, Stream A is a tributary to Hylebos Creek which maintains historic populations of coho and chum salmon. No known natural permanent blockages occur within the Stream A or Hylebos Creek downstream of the project site. Chapter 22-1306(a)(1) requires the establishment of a 100-foot setback, measured horizontally from the ordinary high water mark, for a major stream. Installation of essential public facilities, public utilities, and ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. August 24, 2001 Page 10 PPS/da - KBOi111A1 -projects =01III ftIwp- N2 U-haul Site Federal Way, Washington Wetland Delineation and Stream Identification Report other public improvements may occur within stream setbacks pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22- 1312(a). Other permitted intrusions into an established stream setback can occur pursuant to Chapter 1312(b) and Chapter 1312(c) of the FWCC. 7.0 SUND4ARY A February 2001 wetland delineation and stream identification survey identified the presence of a wetland and stream complex (Wetland A - City of Federal Way Wetland No. 20-21-04-84 and Stream A - West Branch Hylebos Creek) located on -site at 34001 Pacific Highway South in Federal Way, Washington. This complex is part of the Kitts Comer Regional Detention Facility and extends off -site to the north and south. Under FWCC, Wetland A is classified as a Category H wetland requiring a 100-foot buffer and Stream A is classified as a Major Stream, requiring a 100-foot buffer: Likewise a surface water management pond and associated swale constructed in upland soils were identified within the central portion of the project site; however, these features are not regulated as environmentally sensitive areas under the Federal Way City Code. As part of the overall landscape, the identified aquatic resources provide water quality, floodwater storage, and avian habitat functions. August 24, 2001 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. PPS/da - K601111A1 projects12001111lkblwp- M Page 11 U-haul Site Federal Way, Wetland Delineation and StrParn 8.0 REFERENCES Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication FWS/OBS-79131. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Federal Way, City of. Undated. Chapter 22, article XIV, environmentally sensitive areas. GretagMacbeth. 1998. Munsell Soil Color Charts. King County. 1990. Sensitive areas map folio. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(26.9). 89 pp. - Reed, P.B., Jr. 1993. Supplement to the national list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). 11 pp. Snyder, D.E. , P.S. Gale, and R.F. Pringle. 1973. Soil survey: King County area, Washington. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Washington, D. C. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1988. Hydric soils of Washington State. Soils Conservation Service (SCS). United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1980. National wetlands inventory (NWI), Poverty Bay quadrangle. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication 96-94. Olympia, Washington. Washington State Department of Fisheries (WDF). 1975. A catalogue of Washington streams and salmon utilization, Volume 1, Puget Sound region. Olympia, Washington August 24, 2001 PPS/da - KBOIIIIAI -projects 120011111kblwp- W2 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Page 12 ■ W i , Project Site Photographs I PHOTO 1— CENTRAL AND EASTERN PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT SITE (looking northeast from approximately top of moderately steep sloped area) PHOTO 2 — CONSTRUCTED SWALE (looking north towards surface water detention pond) PHOTO 3 — DETENTION POND LOCATED PRIMARILY OFF -SITE TO THE NORTH (looking north from approximately constructed Swale) PHOTO 4 — MODERATELY STEEP SLOPED AREA AND EXISTING GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD (looking north from SSMH #2) PHOTO 5 — KITTS CORNER REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY (looking north from flow control structure [outlet from western treatment cell] located offsite) PHOTO 6 — EXISTING GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD AND WETLAND A (looking south from existing SSMH #1) n Pi �----"„•_ `�� y%Rv V•Lll�� ��L J 2kru0- -U Kir-KAr LUCATED WITHIN PROJECT SITE (looking northeast) ---=-L`u•= �i U 1A%MMUVi Ur iui is UUKNLK KLGIUNAL DETENTION FACILITY (looking north) APPENDIX B Wetland Delineation Datasheets DATA FORM I (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (NVA State Wetland Delineation Manual or -.1-1 .1 t 1987 Co Wedand Delineation Manual) V' 0 Project/Site: U-1AAUL Date: Fers a7, aoo _ 3qoo1 PAC. H why Applicantlowner. U - MALfL - TQT'P_PUJArZ:01-J*A(_- County: j4r Investigator(s): 'PET-F- Sfr/R: S -a o /T -a I N it C- 1- Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? no ------ Community ID:, UV5L A "-b Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation Trans'ec[ ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: - Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (for strata. indicate T = tree. S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator ~ Dominant Plant 52ecies Stratum 9c cover Indicator A C�� S 570 FA C_ r_0L0&Jr_A(_ QF-OT&W, 2070 F-Ac- OeG & Z I 0;de, r- A C. 0 HYDROPHY171C VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC Check all indicators that apply & explAin below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation 'A"etland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowled-e-6tie.-fional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Flydrophytic vegetation present? Cyes ) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 0 ,F: Qopn,:AjAAjr %Ji:_&G-T-Arr-r-o^J r<= 1 7 r- S 14 Y t�p_o P14 Yr 410 HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ves Water Marks: ves ffo' Sediment Deposits.-, yes on ' (no yes: Based on: soil temp (record temp Drift Linek yes Drainage Patterns: no —other(explain) -Tr-mv of Y V_ Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) - Loca-1 Soil Surr6v-­y6sno Channels < 12 in. ves no Depth to free water in pit: inches FACNeutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves ye(_ff_F4) Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gave data: Aerial photogrRhs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes —.7 Rationale for decision/Remarks: 00 T-tZD1: CA-Toit Q OF W C- T LA K)!Db "Ybeac_a&Z LJR-RE 0 R 3 G R %J Ga 0 S_ Map Unit Name 9ves-Ertl' - H LS" 'L VOA —Drainage Class +=xcsst��c�1 ❑�•�tu�❑ . (Series &- Phase) Field observations confirrri Ycs �No Taxonomy (subgroup) Ol srr�G xE a �r� r - ma d e? t , _ Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions. Drawing of soil . Profile Description Depth Horizon (inches) (Munsell. ; (Munsell :: size,& contrast structure, etc. moist) moist) ' -(matcdescri h ption]. 0 - 7 I oy@ SmAl.l- G2AVt_( 3°;, - .._.. 1Y=Wve- 7- 17 t Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) e a Matrix chroma with - - - Histosol _<Z ,mottles - Histic Epipedon - Mg or Fe Concretions ; Sulfidic Odor - - -- -- " --High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils — Aquic Moisture Red me — Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Reducing Conditions Listed on National/Local Hvdric Soils List — Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix --Other (explain iri remarks) Hydric soils present? yes Rationale for decision/Remarks: -=_1Jv =NDT.CAToi�•S of I�YpRLG';,So=�-,..WEQC oBSERv�1� i Wetland Determination (circle) - rr Hydroph� tic vegetation present? ,:= yes ;no; , : ; ,, the point Yes no Hydric soils present? yes. Y.0 d . -Is sampling ,, Wetland hydrologyresent? es o ��`ithin"a wetland. Rationale/Remarks: �►s, M6r ,vo xNo�cAro�s of EVEN THOU T11C HYtai2DP%YTre_ v errl=rATro� c QrrFRcA LJ , . ._.. HYbe S03:L& o2 c,aert►�Nb HYDtzcLo Y WERE OQSEeuF_D, --NOTES: _ GQASS SppcL[-S Q$SE-QVEI�._. LtKGLy ASSOC.jA.rEt> .. cul TESL SEED m=xruae uSEp STAeL.GZZE 'rH E• Sire. SPRcte�Q ASSW►+&p IC MAINTItTN A N2GH TpLr=fk-AAJtF_ F-OP__ 1JAeZAT-.td►1 S =N HYARot-d&V. �. P -oT L-OCArE t�,, Or-F-slTE OrsF OF SDZrAr;Lr oP-1rTE ' Revised4/9T _ t o cA rroN . 0 9 DATA FORM I (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or IQR7 t-'nrnQ Wptlnnd Delineation Manual) Project/Site: U - fiAUL Date: 3Noot PAC. WwY_ S FG-bF'P-At- WAY Applicantlowner. u-HAu� ZNT7:IZNATZoN�!(r, County: 1c1~r��.:Cav�sTy •M State: WA Invest igator(s): p F_T t= S c)P F 9— s/T/R: s Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ►e no Communitv ID:. W r T LA P0b Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)' yes C707D Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes no Plot ID: Ez lanation of iiical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree: S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) _ Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum %c cover Indicator eS-p ALDSTez o% FAG: I:c0-psreJZ- 5 9o% FAr-W /1Scu.+�6 S r_ P G C Fir G O G/a u-A r- w t-_TTe re- - SOFT RuS H �'' �S% FAC W oP.c.tlAep C eASS ►-1 sd 7o FACU Cprnw+ON _ .. %1EL%JF-rcr2-*.Ss k� S°/C FAG_ _ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Phvsiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation n Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations — Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature ^ Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ► es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: G6'/o of: oornrp-)ANi vG�ETATro&) Lz HYQROPHYrLc- HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ves na Water Marks: yes ® Sediment Deposits: yes on r Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes °® Drainage Patterns: yes Q other(explain) TIME OF Dept. of inundation: 1 inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <1? irv.,veD, no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral:: a no Water -stained_ no Leaves yes Depth to saturated soil:G " inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial 2hotographsOther: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: SOILS wE jLC O\3SeRuEu To 3E SATL)ZAT@U �9T G Tn�cttES* OKiDZZFP t tVt RooT 2ow�BS wP_QE ALSn ORSf=UR-uE1�6. SOILS A r {l� Map Unit Name v . n - (Series R Phase) rLse- XCttaC#+REPTS I axonomv Profile D Depth (inches) lCi -iT Drainage Class F,ccFsslvELY 9eA� 3 Field observations confine es No maoted type . — ascription `4ottle abundance Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors � size contrast (Munsell (. moist) moist) ivYe S/a-- ._.� ._. _. 1oyr-3 ;L Drawing of soil )ill Texture, concretions. structure, etc. : ;profile match descri tion A SIB "Cr I Lam Aire = raN S S IG SAK3 �. Lo 7 rHydrnic.soillIndica'ors* (check all that apply) .. - Matrix chroma. E ?with mottles Histosol c E i edon y �__�- Mg or Fe Concretions Histi p p . -- = High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking' in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions _ Other {ex)lain in remarks) _ Glzyed or Low-Chroma {=l ] matrix Hydric soils present? yes IIO h r,r �ot�trlt 6- a Apr o Rationale for decisionlRemarks: AT �ufl =R.oa ewjceerroNs wE2F ctis�4r�D• .rr s xreO 1ou� - CNRe',w�A r I '^^ zNt�seAta�s of H7�CRLe soLLS CL.� aow-GHRpr+A� � � NOT W5 CNST(2AT7_ FLE�� ►1YP�Lc SoLc,s oN T}tF 4i/,sxs THEsE sosc.s sAT=sTFLSZ Erie-rF�t+Ncc.AL CRLTERCN Foft_ of d�SEkVer17 t1YCR0l. '/ GyE• SATURATE❑ -ro SVRF,SG� WLtland Determirtation (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Is the sampling point e no Hydric soils present? \%.ithin a wetland^. Weiland hvdroloa resent? es no RationalefRemarks: --ALL.-rAp-=c C�Ll"�=2LA W�eRE ::-shrrsF=�a, w NOTES: }'es no Revised 4/97.1 APPENDIX C Definitions for Categories of Wetland Plant Indicators CATEGORY DEFINITION Obligate Plant almost always occurs (estimated probability of (OBL) occurrence > 99 percent) in wetland habitats under natural conditions. Facultative Wetland Plant usually occurs (estimated probability of occurrence (FACW) between 67 and 99 percent) in wetland habitats, but occasionally found in non -wetland habitats. Facultative Plant as equally likely to occur (estimated probability of (FAC) occurrence between 34 and 67 percent) in wetlands as in non -wetlands. Facultative Upland Plant usually occurs (estimated probability of occurrence (FACU) between 67 and 99 percent) in non -wetland habitats, but occasionally found in wetland habitats. Obligate Upland Plant almost always occurs (estimated probability of (UPL) occurrence > 99 percent) in non -wetland habitats under natural conditions. No Indicator Status Sufficient information to determine indicator status of this (NI) plant is not currently available. Positive Sign Plants more frequently found within the wetter range of (+) the category. Negative Sign Plants more frequently found within the drier range of the (-) category. Sods Information N `s A m 0 2000 REFERENCE: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SOILS CONSERVATION SERVICE. 1973. SCALE IN FEET SHEET NO. 15, KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON (POVERTY BAY QUADRANGLE). a APPENDIX D n Associated Earth sciences, Inc. SOILS SURVEY U-HAUL SITE 4 ® ® ® ® ® FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON DATE 8/01 PROJ. NO. KBO1111A ci.pitation is 70 to 80 inches, and the mean annual temperature is about 500 F. The frost -free season .is about 150 days. Elevation ranges from 400 to 500 feet. In a representative profile, the surface layer is very dark grayish -brown to dark grayish -brown fine 'sandy loam that extends to a depth of about 34 inches. The underlying la;(ers are black gravelly sand and gravelly sandy loam that extend to a depth of 60 inches or more. Edgewick soils are used for pasture. Ed ewick fine sandy loam (Ed). --This sail is slightly convex or level. Areas are irregular in shape and range from 5 acres to more than 300 acres in size. Slope is less than 3 percent. Representative profile of Edgewick.fine sandy loam, in pasture, 1,430 feet east and 1,000 feet south of the west quarter corner of sec. 15, T. 23 N., R. 8 E.: Ap--O to 9 inches, very dark grayish -brown (10YR 3/2) fine sandy loam, grayish brown (10YR ••5/2) dry; weak, fine, granular structure; slightly hard, very friable, nonsticky, non - plastic; many roots; strongly acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. 8 to 11 inches thick. C1--9 to 34 inches, dark grayish -brown (2.5Y 4/2) and olive -brown (2.5Y 4/4) fine sandy loam, grayish brown (2.5Y 5/2) dry; massive; soft, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; common roots; medium acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. 24 to 30 inches thick. IIC2--34 to 60 inches, black (5Y 2/2), stratified gravelly sand and gravelly sandy loam, grayish brown (2.5Y 5/2) dry; massive; soft, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; neutral. The C horizon ranges from dark grayish brown to olive brown. The content of gravel is as much as 10 percent in places in the A horizon and the Cl horizon. The IIC horizon, at a depth below 32 to 40 inches, ranges from dark grayish brown to black and from stratified sand to fine sandy loam that has gravel in some places. Soils included with this soil in mapping make up no more than 15 percent of the total acreage. Some areas are up to 10 percent Nooksack and Si soils; some are up to 5 percent Pilchuck soils, which occupy the natural levees along streams and the higher swells and undulations; some areas are up to 2 percent the poorly drained Puget soils; and some are 1 percent the poorly drained Seattle soils. Permeability is moderately rapid. The effective rooting depth is restricted by the gravelly sand substratum. There is a seasonal high water table at a depth of 3 to 4 feet. Available water capacity is moderately high. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. The hazard of stream overflow is moderate to severe. This soil is used for pasture. Capability unit IIIw-l; woodland group 2ol. 466-266 0 - 73 - 2 The Everett series is made up or somewnaz exces- sively drained soils that are underlain by .very gravelly sand at a depth of 18 to 36 inches. These soils formed in very gravelly glacial outwash de- posits, under conifers. They are on terraces and terrace fronts and are gently undulating and mod- erately steep. Slopes are 0 to 30 percent. The annual precipitation is 35 to 60 inches, and the mean annual air temperature is about 50° F. The frost -free season ranges from 150 to 200 days. Elevation ranges from about sea level to 500 feet. In a representative profile, the surface layer and subsoil are black to brown, gravelly to very gravelly sandy loam about 32 inches thick. The substratum extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. It is multicolored black to gray very gravelly sand (pl. I, left). - Everett soils are used for timber and pasture and for urban deifelopment. Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes (EvB).--This nearly level to very gently un lating soil is on terraces. Areas are irregular in shape and range from 5 acres to more than 200 acres in size. Representative profile of Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, in forest, 450 feet west and 250 feet north of the southeast corner of sec. 30, T. 22 N., R. 7 E.: 01--1 to 3/4 inch, undecomposed roots, twigs, and moss; abundant roots. 1 to 2 inches thick. 02--3/4 inch to 0, black (10YR 2/1),decomposed organic matter; abundant roots. 3/4 of an inch to 1 1/2 inches thick. Al--0 to 1 1/2 inches, black (10YR 2/1) sandy loam, gray (10YR 5/1) dry; massive; soft, very fri- able, nonsticky, nonplastic; many roots; slightly acid; abrupt, distinct boundary. 0 to 1 1/2 inches thick. B2ir--1 1/2 to 17 inches., dark -brown (7.5YR 3/4) gravelly sandy loam, yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) dry; massive; soft, very friable, non - sticky, nonplastic; many roots; slightly acid; clear, smooth boundary. 10 to 18 inches thick. B3--17 to 32 inches, brown (10YR 4/3) very gravelly sandy loam, pale brown (10YR 6/3) dry; massive; soft, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; many roots; medium acid; clear, wavy boundary. 8 to 18 inches thick. IIC--32 to 60 inches, black and dark grayish -brown GOYR 2/1 and 4/2) very gravelly coarse sand, gray, grayish brown, and brown (10YR 5/1 and 5/3) dry; single grain; loose, nonsticky, nonplastic; few roots; medium acid. The A horizon ranges from black to dark gray. The Sir horizon ranges from dark brown and brown to dark yellowish brown and the B3 horizon from grown to dark brown. The IN horizon ranges from black and very dark brown to olive brown, and from very 15 gravelly coarse sand -to very gravelly loamy sand. Depth to the IIC horizon ranges from 18 to 36 Some areas are.. up to 5 percent included Alderwood soils, on .the more rolling and undulating -parts of the landscape; some are about 5 percent the•deep,- sa 4y Indianola soils; and some are -up to 25 percent Neiiton very gravelly loamy- sands:. :Also. included. - in mapping are areas where consolidated. -glacial till, which characteristically underlies Alderwoodsoils, is at a depth of -5. to 15 -feet.. permeapilsty is rapid.:-- The effective rooting. . depth..is 60 .inches. or -more, .Available: water capac- ity,.is _low. •Runoff. is slow., and the erosion -hazard is slight.; - ; 'this. soil is used -for -timber and; pasture and for urban development.- -Capability uni-t ivsrl;:.-:wowand group Everr�t#, grave sandy loam, 5; .to 15 . event. slopes (EvC} ,--'Phis soil is rolling.,: Areas -are- irregular in shape, have a convex surface, and range from 25 acres to more than ?00 acres- in size. - .Run- off is -slow to medium,.and xhe Fosaon ha ard-is slight to ioderate;. _ `- 5oiis' included- with this-'soal.. in dapping inalce lip no more than 25, percent' o£ the toCal acrePIZ Some areas are up to 5 percent Alderwood soil's., -whi.-.ch: overlie- consolidated glacial; till; some ire. up 'to...- 20 percent"Neilton �ery,grave1ly,ioamy sand: and - some are'about 15'percent included areas of Everett soils where slopes are more gentle Haan-5 percent and where they are steeper than 15 percent. ,. . This Everett soil -' used', far timber and panne and for urban -development, CapAi: ty 'unit_ VIs-1; woodland group 3f3. Everett gravelly sandy loamy 1'Stn 3a- "ercent s l ' es EVD) .--This soil occurs as-' long-, narrow areas, mostly along drai:nageways or on shorV'slopes between terrace• benches. It is''imilar to'Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent. slopes, but in most places is stonier and nor e gravelly: ' Soil's included wiih'ihis soil in -Mapping make up no more than 30 percent of the- total --acreage_ Some areas are up to,lo'percent'Ajaerwood soils, which overlie consolidated=gla'cial-till; some are up to 5 percent the deep,..sandy Indianola soiIs;,some, are ._ up to to -percent Neiiton very gravelly•ivamy,sand; and some are about 15 percent included areas of Everett soils where slopes are less ihan,15 percent. 'Punoff is'medium to rapid,•and'the:erosion hazard is moderate to severe. Most of the acreage is used for timber. Capa- bility unit VIe-I; woodland group 3f2.. Everett-Alderwood avelly sandy loamy, 6 to 15 percent slo es [EWC).--This mapping unit is about equal parts Everett and Alderwood soils.- The soils are rolling slopes are dominantly. 6:to 10 percent, but range from gentle'to steep.' Most areas 'are irregular in shape and range from 15 to I00 acres or more in size. In areas classified as Everett soils, field examination and geologic maps indicate 16 the presence of a consolidated substratum at a.aep uL of 7 -to 20 feet-. This substratum is the same mate rival as that in -the Alderwood `.soils . - - = - . ;Some areas are up to 5 percent included Norma:, Seattle., and Tukwila soils,. -:all of .which -are poorly drained. Runoff. is :slow to •medium, and the erosion hazard is. -slight-,to -moderate. Most of the acreage is used -for timber.: --Capabil- ity unit VIs-1; woodland .group 3f3.. .. -Indianola. Series - _ The Indianola series is made up of somewhat_ - ex6essively dr-ained •soils that formed .under conifers in- sandy; recessXonal.; stratified glacial - drift -. These undulating,} rolling., and hummocky soils are on terraces. S.1-opes. -are 0 to .30 percent.. Th.e. =Tvual precipitation is 30:.to 55 inches,; and the mean • -• - annual air 'temperature - is. about 50°: F... '.The "frost - free season is 150 to 210 days. Elevation ranges -€rom-about sea level to 1,000•-.feet. In, a, representative profile, .the upper :30..inches is brown", dark yellowish-brown,.and light olive - brown :loamy fine .sand: This.'is- underlain by e° sand that extends to a depth: :of b.0-:znches- •dr more (pl.;-I, right):,. Indianola soils are used for .ti_mber and- for urban development. -f Indianola -loamy- fine.. sand, `4 to• :15 le ;:I sl es (InC).--Thus undulating and ro3iing soli as convex slopes.::::_It ;is near. thE_edges :of upland terraces. Areas range from 5 to more than 100:acres in size. Representative:profile,:of:Indianola loamy. fine :sand;. 4 to 15 percent slopes, in forest.,.•1.,000 feet west and-900 feet. south of the northeast corner of sec. 32, T-. 25 N. R..6 E.: 01--3/4,inch to 0, leaf -litter.. - 821ir--0..•,to. 6 i.nches,•.brown (10YR 4•/3) loamy fine sand, brown (1j)YR 5/3) dry;. massive; soft:, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; many roots; slightly acid; clear; smooth boundary:° 4- to. 8: inches -thick. - B22ir -6 to 15 inches, dark yellowish -brown (10YR 4/4) loamy fine sand,ibrown (10YR-S/3) dry; massive; soft, very friable, nonsticky4 non - :plastic; common roots; slightly acid; -clear,. smooth boundary.. 6 to 15 inches thick. C1--15 to•30 inches, light. olive -brown (2.5Y 5/4) loamy fine sand, yellowish. brown. (JOYR 6/4) dry; massive; soft; yery.friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; common roots; slightly acid; gradual, smooth boundary. .12 to 17 inches thick. = C2--30 to,60.inches, olive (5Y 5/4) sand, light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) dry; single grain; loose, nonsticky,.nonplastic;.few roots; slightly acid. Many feet thick. There is a thin, very dark brown Al horizon at the surface in some places. The B horizon ranges' grayish-obrown to pale olive and from loamy'fine'saftd to -..sand. T?' -in:lenses of silty material are..at a depth-'of,4•to 7 feet in some places Soils -included with this soil in mapping make up no mare than 25-.percent of the total acreage'. Some areas are up to 10 percent Alderwood soils.; on the more rorlling.and undulating parts of the landscape; some arei'up.tn.8 percent the deep, gravelly Everett and•Neilton soils; some are up to 15 percent.Kitsap soils, which.have platy lake sediments :in the sub- soil; and, some- are up to IS percent Ragnax soils, which have a sandy substratum. permeability,is rapid. The effective rooting depth .:is ' 60-' niches or more. Available water. capac- ity:is.moderate; Runoff is slow to medium•;:and the . erosion hazard J s slight to moderate. _ This svil'is used for timber and for:urb.an devel- opm,ent.'•,Capability unit IVs-2; woodland:group-.4s3. ~Indiauola•loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes (:InA) .--This: soil occupies smooth terraces is long narrow tracts adjacent to streams. Areas range from about 3 to 70 acres in size. Soils:•inc-luded with this soil in mapping. make up 'no more than 20;percent of the total- acreage. Some $real: are up .to 5 percent Alderwood •soils, on the more rolling and undulating parts of the landscape; .some -ace al=t 10 percent the deep, gravelly Everett and-Neilton soils; some are up to 10 percent Indian- ola loamy fine, sand that has stronger slopes; and., some areas -are' up .to l0 percent the poorly drained Norma,...Shalcar,, Tukwila soils. •- - Runoff.- is:_ slow; and the erosion hazard is; slight. ,-.,This. soil• •is used for timber. Capabili:ty.unit IVs_-2. woodland group 4s3. Indianola loamy fine sand, 15 to 30 percent slopes- ,(-InD)_--This soil is along entrenched streams. Soils included with this soil in mapping makeup no more than 25 percent of the total acreage. Some areas are up to 10 percent Alderwood soils; some are about 5 percent the deep, gravelly Everett and Neil - ton soils; some are up to 15 percent Kitsap soils, which have,. platy, silty lake sediments in the sub- soil,, and- some are up to. 15 percent Indianola loamy fine: sand -''that -has milder slopes. ..Runoff' is. -medium, and the erosion hazard, is moder- ate- to, severe,.' This: soil is used for timber. Capability unit VIe-1;;Woodland group 4s2. Kitsa Series The Kitsap series is made up of moderately well drained soils that formed in glacial lake deposits, under w cover of conifers and shrubs. These soils are..on terraces and strongly dissected terrace fronts', .They: are gently undulating and rolling and moderately steep. Slopes are 2 to 70 percent. platy, silty sediments are at a depth of 18 to 40 j inches-. The -annual precipitation is 35.to 60 inches, Elevation ranges from about sea level to 500 feet.; in•a representative profile, -:the surface layer and subsoil are very dark brown •and.dark yellowish- brown- silt loam: that extends-. to--a:depth, of about. 2.4 inches..*The substratum. is. olive -gray silty clay . loam. It extends to a depth .of 60•inches, or. more. Kitsap soils. are- -used for timber. and pasture: Kitsa silt loam, 2 to .8 percent -slo es .(KpB)..-,- This.undulating soil is on. low terraces,•of the; major valleys of the Area. Areas: range' -from- 5 acres.- to. more than 600 acres in size and are nearly circular to irregular in -,shape... Some areas are one -eighth to a half mile. wide 'and: up 'to .3 'or 4 'mi.les long•., • ' . • Representative profile of Kitsap silt loam, 2 to 8 percent ..slopes,, in pasture,.•.820 feet west and.-350 feet south of east 'quarter ;corner of. sec-. 28,; T. 25 Ap--0 to..5 inches, very..-Aark brown ..(IRYR 2/.2) -silt :loam,, dark grayish brown; (10YR 4/2) dry-; mod - orate ; •medium,'.granul.ar structured slightly - hard, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic;- :Many roots-;- medium -acid;: abrupt, .smooth:, bound- ary. 82=:-5 to 24 inches., dark yellowish-brown-.(IOYI� 3/4) silt loam, brown-;(lOYR•5/3);.dry; 2•:percent iron concretions; weak, coarse, prismatic structure; slightly hard, friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; many roots; slightl) acid; abrupt, wavy boundary. 18 to 21 inches thick . < :• s :. IIC--24 to 60•. inches,. olive=gray ,(5Y 5/2) .silty clay loam,. light gray; (5Y .7/2) dry; many, •medium and.coarse,:praminent-.mottles. of dark yellowis brown -and .strong brawn (10YR 4/4 and-.7.5YR 5/8) ;. moderate; ,thin-• and medium,- platy struc- ture.;..hard•; firm; -sti-cky, plastic; few roots to a depth -of 36•,inches, none below;- strongly acid. . ;The A horizon° -rang es- from.very.dark brown to dar brown. The B horizon ranges-.from.dark yellowish brown :to -dark brown 'and :from: silt loam to silty' cla, loam. ••The, platy I -IC horizon ranges from grayish . brown to olive.gray and :from silt:loam to silty cla; loam that has thin•lenses, of loamy fine sand in places. Brownish mottles are common in the upper part of the ITC horizon: ` Some':areas are up to .10 p'erc.ent included Alderwoc gravelly sandy..loam; some. are -up to 5 percent the very .deep, sandy Indianola.. soils; • and some are up t- 5 pergent the poorly drained Bellingham, Tukwila, and Seattle soils. - Water flows on top of the substratum in winter. Permeability is moderate .above the substratum and very slow within it. The effective rooting depth is about 36 inches. Available water capacity is moder ate to moderately high. Runoff is slow to medium, and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate. This soil is used for timber and pasture. Capabi. ity unit IIIe-1; woodland group M . 17 The A. horizon-: ranges from -very dark grayish brown to very dark brown:: The C horizon:consists.of.layers of silt loam; -very fine sandy loam,,sandy-•1oam,._ loamy- sand;. --and- sand; : the thickness. -of each -layer varies-. Mottles occur at a.depth.below:30 to:40'. inches .in :some.•places. Some areas are up:to•25 or 30-percent.inclusions of somewhat poorly drained Briscot, Oridia, acid -Wood- inville soils; -and some are•up to 10 percent the poorly drained Puget soils.. Total -inclusions do not exceed •30 percent.:.:: _ • :• Permeability is moderate. The effective rooting deptli 1s 60 inches or more. A season awater. table is at.a:depth of .3 to 4 feet in places; ; Available water capacity .is: high:- • Runoff : is : slow;. and. the erosion hazard is slight. The hazard of stream over- flow is slight:to severe,.depending.on:the amount of flood protection provided.''.: This soil is used mostly for. -row crops. Capabil-, ity unit IIw-1; woodland group 2ol. Nooksack_ Series .. ac The-Nooksack_series;is made.:up--of well=drained soils that formed, in alluvium in river valleys, under' a, cover of grass; -conifers,:. and hardwoods. Slopes- are 0 to 2-:percent. .-.The annual precipitation is 35-to.,55.inches ; and - the mean- annual, air-.tempera- ture:is:about 50' F.--.The.frost- free: season: is about 190 days':. Elevation:. ranges from about'sm:level to 500 feet. • In a representative profile, the lsoil� is, very- -_:' dark grayish -brown,'-dark •grayish-brown;:and'.grayish- brown silt loam to a: depth of 60. inches or more. Nooksack soils are used for-- row crops':and.pasture and -for urban -development. Nooksack silt loam (Nk).--This riearly.-level soil is in long, narrow areas••that: range. from 5 to about' 300=..acres. in size. .-Slopes-,are less than 2 percent. Representative -profile of cultivated Nooksack silt' loam, .1;800; feet' east- and 500, feet_ south of the west quarter corner of sec. 4, : T.• 24--N.:j- R.: 7 ,E. : Apl-=0 to 2-inches; very dark grayish=brown•(10YR 3/2) siit. loam, grayish- brown (10YR• 5/2) -dry; - few-, fine.,1faint',' dark. yellowish -brow (10YR 4/4) mottles; weak, --thin-; platy -structure; slightly hard, very' friable,. nonsticcy, non - .plastic; many roots; slightly acid; -abrupt, smooth. boundary. 2 to 3 inches thick. Ap2--2•to 11 inches, very dark-: g-rayish-brown ' (10YR 3/2) silt, loam, grayish brown (10YR,5/2) dry; weak, coarse, .prismatic: structure;: slightly .-chard, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic;- common•roots; slightly. acid; abrupt, • smooth boundary. 8 to•.10'inches thick.-. B2-=-41 to 29 inches'; dark grayish-brown.(2.SY 4/2) silt loam; light brownish gray (2%5Y:6/2) dry; weak, medium, prismatic structure and'weak, 20 wuuuwt iuoLs; meaium acia; clear, Smootn -:.bqundary, 17 to-21 inches thick„•.. - f9.� C1--29;_to;42-inches, dark grayish-brown;CIOY1:,4/21-..; aTid -grayish-brown (2.5Y 5/2) sil;t.., lqam and,• -z •thin lenses of :very fine sandy loam, brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) dry; -:massive,; slightz friable, nonsticky;.--.nonplastic; common roots; slightly acid; clear, s1gooth.,..,:: boundary, 10 to 15 inches thick. C2==d2 tn` 60: inches, .grayish -brown (2:57 loam;' light brownish gray (2.5Y•6/2)':dry,; -3 j 'massive;'hard,-friable, sticky; plastie;-com=` mon roots; medium acid. �r=' The='6 and-,C horizons are mostly slit' loaf and' vez7':fzne sandy loam and have lenses, of 'silty= clad ` loam and fine sandy loam. The C hoi1zoP:1Ls 3arV:-'' grayish- brown•, ' grayish brown, or. dark, brown., - ! - - i Some Aa pas are up to 5 percent included poorly drained-. A►�get• soils; and some are 10 ;tA ; percent„ the somewhat. poorly- drained Oridia and Brigce.� soils. Also included with this soil in mapping ararareas;.;� of the poorly drained Woodinville -silt- loam.,ar)d a few areas :-of•-a_Woodinvi.lie. silty clay loam.,�,4ncluded- soils.make up no more than 15 percent of•the_,total acreage. Permeability is moderate. The effective rooting; depth is 60. inches or more. A seasonal water -table iz at. a- depth., of 3 to 4 feet in places; Available water capaci;ty.-is high. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. Stream ovgTt;ow;j§,;a mod- erate to severe hazard. This: soil, is used for row, crops and .pasture ' anti_ ; ' for, urban.-deyelopment. Capability unit •IIwTl.; wood- land group- 2p.l.. Norma Series = The Norma series is made up of poorly- irained soils that- formed in alluvium, under -sedges:;= grass;: conifers, and hardwoods. These soils'are-in'basins- on the glaciated uplands and in areas along the''Xt stream bottoms. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent: annual Orecipitation is 3S to 60 inches,' arid`*h�i mean' armual air temperature is about e frost -free season is 150 to 200 days. EI'evatiori' '' ranges`,'from about -sea level to 660 feet: In a representative profile, the= stixfahe' layer=I's black` 'sandy- loam about 10 inches thick; •'The's4bs'ai1 is dark grayish -brown and dark -gray san$y�loarm-a1ia: extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. = Norma'soils are used mainly •for past'Ure� drained.- they are used for row crops. Norma sandy loam (No) .--This soil occtirs� as `strips 25 to-300 feet -wide. Slopes are less "ihan_=2 percent. Areas aTe :level or concave and range from` 1 to''abou# 100 acres in size. Representative profile of Norma sandy loam, in a pasture, 725 feet east and 50 feet north of the south' quarter- corner of sec. 31, T.'20-'N:;`R 7-E.. ;: dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2)dry; moderate, - fine;­garafidlait -struct'ure, slightly hard, very `-"friable, slightly•sticky, slightly plastic;: 'many•'xoots;'sli•ghtly•acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. :10 to'12 inches thick B21g-=10 to• 30'indhes, -dark g-kayigh-brown (2.5Y 4/2) sandy loam! light brownish, grdy -(2.5Y--6/2) dry; many, medium, prominent, yellowish -red — (5YR 4/8) and brown-(7.5YR 4/4) -mottles, very' Pale brdwn (10YR'1/4)-and reddish'yellow (I.5YR'6/8) dry; thin platy -structure; :hard, '- very friable,'nonsticky;'nonpi-antic; -few --roots; •slightly"acid; -clear! boundary. '19 t6'24 ' _ inches ` thick:; - _ B22g--30 to 60 inches, dark -gray (5Y 4/1) sandy:::- loaffi;` light gray (5Y .7/1) dry;' -.common, fine, prominent, strong -brown (7.5YR 5/6) and reddish -yellow (7.5YR 6/6) mottles, yellowish brown:. (lOYR'_5f 8) - Mq pale. brown - f 2=5Y 7/4) dry; mass ive;=slightly •hard, -•very frieb1e;.nonstidky nonplastic; `few': mots; slightly - acid. The A horizon ranges from black to very dark biowft and%is' as -=much as 15 percent gravel. The::B horiton commonly, -is sandy, loam that -:in places: is- stratifiedi witft silt loam and loamy sand: _-Itt_is as much as 35 percent gravel in some places. The B- . horizon, is mottled gray,, dark-. gray, and darjc grayish areas` are up . to. 5'; Aerceq, incluapfl. Seattle 7Uwila, and Shaicar; soars.; and 'some a;re up.to 5 percent. Alde'rivgad: and Eviirett. soils, . at; the" slightly higher_ ke'.Vatiojis:_:Ili, the axes northwest.. of Auburn, In- the Green diver Valley;"iTere are areas "of Norma soils - that- kavp . an organic sprface_ Zayer: as;Fiick. as 12t inahzs., nix a��.: plac-i :;: 4116 inc lud'ed' Ar-e- small-' areas_.of,Kc?r 4 spi,is:.tieat`have a si. .;,loam sua"face layer- : - , . _�. Pexmeabi liy :i s moderately' rapid:'.-T_i•-e seasonal A ei table is at ar.'near the surfacer ' In':drained argas,,..:rhe• effective_'xvo"ting_ depth is 60 inches or fore. 1n unaf*ined areas,' ica +ting'dept i;s restrict- ed.-, Af available watei._capaUty:'i' moiclexAedy high to. higfi- Runoff, is -slow,' and the era sion 14iard is alight: � Straaiq o-ver€la►v s a: severe._ hazard' xih places. This- soils is, used mostly. for ,pasture.` .D aine4 s're.as:, are, used for zoy, craps :::.Capability' unit IIIi4-3; A94 ani grotp..3w2. _. - ... :"Oscan 'Series_ The Orcas series is..ngade up of very .poorly drained organic soils that foriaed ire sphagnui mass ' and small amounts of Labrador tea and cranberry plants.-• These doll's- in basins.on ,the 4ndulating�, IV' I ; g ?Iacia'eh 4P.1aiids . Siope-s •-are' O 'td 1- pe:rcerkt , Annu= precipitation 'is- 35-, to: fi'0 inches., and the mean. anr►ua_l . air :tempeiaturd .is: about'SO F. - : ;The frost free' 's aaaoli;' a s 150 :to: i8O days-.... Elevation ranges i from In' ta; 5�4 eet. ri a 'representative',profile,, the Sure -ace layer is dark reddish -brown sphap4g peat about-fi iricfies peat that extends to -a depth of about:60 inches. Orcas-•soils are used•mostly_as wildlife habitat. Orc(.Or).--This level or slightly concave l •, soizs an -Tiregularly shaped •areas . that. range from 2 to.about 10 acres.in.si.z.e, $lopes -are •less than I percent. ,Representative•profile.of 4rcas peat; under wild.. cranberries;;600 feet north%md.650 feet west of the east quarter ,corner':of.se.c:; 8;.T. 24-.:N.,. R::.6..E.: Oil- -O.•to:-%•inches;+.dark reddish -brown (SYR�3/.2) _sphagnum:peat, very .pale '4xown.;(l0YR,7/3) dry; soft,-spongy;rmany. roots; .extremely -•acid; clear, smooth boundary. ,,,•6:to•:8 .inches .thick. Oi2--6 to 60 inches, yellowish -red (5YR $/:6,4/63 .4/8) sphagnum peat, .very. pale. -brown (10YR 7/4). 'dry; soft, .spongy.; few •roots;: extremely,. acid. The -,Oil ] ori:zon.ranges from dark :reddish -brown to reddish"•black: 70nly slight., decomposition, has oc- ccirred,. r .The, Oi2_horizon As; pniformly.•-sphagnrun peat that'ranges.from dark.:reddish..brown through. -yellow- ish: red..•to-:very- pale, brown, :Some -areas Mapped- ate ;up=to,20 percent included Seattle and Tukwila mucks,:•and-_some. are Per- cent per- cent the -met Bellingham,.. soils. _ :-._- -.Permeability. is .very rapid: . There is:a•,water.. table: at' or; close - tothe-surface..for:several: Months each.year. .In.:areas;.where,the .water•:table: is con - ,;trolled;:: -the: effective- rooting..- depth, is 60,:i.4ches gr-Anore... an-:undrained areas ;_rooting.depthr,is res:tricted..: The. aya,lable.water,:gapaeity.:is high. Runoff is: ponded., =and• there, is:'no-, erosion --hazard, ,This soil'is used: mostly -as wildlife habitat. Capability.::unit VIIIw::71; :no. w-op4land, gigssification. _ ... .. _•d,idia"Series. The Oridia series is made up of somewhat poorly drained soils that formed in alluvium in river vaileys,`Sla►es'-'ire 4 to' '2- percent.• 'The annual. precipitatioa'''is ft-to S5- inches; and the. mesh anhu- a1. ailr'vei,perature is about 5Q°: p', the. k'rost-tTee=: seasori'`is about 2b07 days:,`hievation'ranges--from ' about'_ io $54eet. In a,representative profile, the surface layer''zs 8a'&�jrayish=-brown slit' Toam`about 9 -inches' thick. The' subsoil is' grayish-brown,Tziark gra)*ii'h-brown, and' gray silt''loam' and silty clay loam'that, extehas to a depth of 60 inches or more. 'Ori'dia soils are used for•row'crops and pasture andfor uicban': devel,opuient.: Or 'dia .silt 'toain [Os) .--.TUts gently Vni &r-fati�ig' soil is in- irregularly' shaped areas'.' Slopes mare less ;than 2 percent: Areas- range kicin 'lb to more"s. than 200 'acres in 'size . Representative profile of Oridia silt loam­,Ii- pasture',_ 850; feet north, 620 fee_ t' east' of 'the'' southwest cornier" of -sec.' 12, _T.` 22"N.., it. -4 E.': -21 APPENDIX E Publisht-d In entory Map BP -- -------- — - ---#-9�r� __ _�— N NOT TO SCALE REFERENCE: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. g APPENDIX E-2 Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WETLANDS INVENTORY 3 ® ® ® ® U-HAUL SITE DATE 8/01 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON PROJ. NO. KB01111A ' - Wetland Number �T 1/4 SectITwNRng��( i L.S336f'`i-. o, . cation {addrsssJcross streets) ~.'..Team Members Date Feld Check: 1 g Base Map #: 1 FIELD DATA Cowardin Class oe Notable Wildlife Features Snags:#'s Z 6" z 12" Windshield Dominant SCA Z 24" Site Not Accessed [50 Heights: % total W L 100 `�� 4 lnfetpresent:�Y} N; width L�11 flow�Y N /Out/et present Y�[•, width flow: N None Observed None Observed r Sources (Y/N) stream ulvert: (diam) sheet flow floodplain seeps Human Disturbances: weowS k)*1 c. M'4 6;� Cafe.` Buffer Conditions: OFFICE DATA Wit -W'"�'� NRCS Soil Unit:' L Rating x400J Ar !l iA Approximate Size: 77, C a 500 tos 2,500 sq.ft z 1 acre, s 2 acre Z 2,500 sf, s '/z acre Z 2 acre, s 5 acre z'h acre, s 1 acre 2 5 acre COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS �� )0 f14 Cr • W-D ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued By: Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Commitment Number: 611048037 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. Countersigned By: -cz,7-Q I - Authorized Officer or Agent SEAI1 Fidelity National Title Insurance Company By: Attest: President Secretary— rTECEIVED JUN. 07 Z013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE A550CIATION The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM WA-FT-FTMA-01530.610051-SPS-1-13-611048037 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. 611048037 ISSUING OFFICE- FOR SETTLEMENT INQUIRIES, CONTACT: Title Officer: Terry Sarver Escrow Officer: Adair Krieger Fidelity National Title Company Chicago Title & Escrow 3500 188th St. SW, Suite 300 1360 E 9Th St #500 Lynnwood, WA 98037 Cleveland„ OH 44114 Main Phone: (425)771-3031 Phone: 216-696-5471 Fax: 216-696-8107 Email: Unit2@fnf.com Email: adair.krieger@ctt.com SCHEDULE A ORDER NO. 611048037 1. Effective Date: January 2, 2013 at 08:OOAM 2. Policy or (Policies) to be issued: a. ALTA Owner's Policy 2006 Proposed Insured: To be Determined Policy Amount: To Be Determined Premium: To Be Determined Tax: To Be Determined Total: To Be Determined b. ALTA Loan Policy 2006 Proposed Insured: Appropriate Lender, its successors and/or assigns as their respective interests may appear. Policy Amount: To Be Determined Premium: To Be Determined Tax: To Be Determined Total: To Be Determined 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is: Fee Simple 4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in land is at the Effective Date vested in: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, an Ohio corporation AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06,17.2006) Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM WA-FT-FTMA-01530.610051-SPS-1-13-611048037 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. 611048037 SCHEDULE A (continued) 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: For APN/Parcel ID(s): 202104-9051-06 That portion of the South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, and that portion of the North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East W.M., records of King County, Washington, lying Westerly of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99) and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 20; Thence South 01 °12'17" West along the East line of said Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1479.34 feet to the Northeast corner of said South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20; Thence North 88°24'53" West along the North line of said South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 169.96 feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99) and the true point of beginning; Thence continue along said North line North 88°45'53" West, a distance of 1143.58 feet to the Northwest corner of said South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20; Thence South 01 °14'32" West along the West line of said Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 328.83 feet to the Southwest corner of said North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20; Thence South 88°46'07" East along the South line of said North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1034.43 feet to said Westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99); Thence North 22°49'31" East along said Westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 115.81 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; Thence along said curve to the left having a radius of 2815.00 feet through a central angle of 04°21'52" an arc distance of 214.43 feet; Thence North 71 °32'21" West, a distance of 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; Thence along said curve to the left having a radius of 2805.00 feet through a central angle of 0°20'24" an arc distance of 16.65 feet to the true point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. ABBREVIATED LEGAL: Ptn NE1/4, 20-21-4 END OF SCHEDULE A AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE A,%MC1AT10N The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM WA-FT-FTMA-01530.610051-SP S-1-13-611048037 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B COMMITMENT NO. 611048037 Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession, or claiming possession, not shown by the Public Records. B. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. C. Easements, prescriptive rights, rights -of -way, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the Public Records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the Public Records. F. Any lien for service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity, or construction or similar charges for sewer, water, electricity, natural gas or other utilities, or for garbage collection and disposal not shown by the Public Records. G. Unpatented mining claims, and all rights relating thereto. H. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. I. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims or title to water. K. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. AMERICAN LANQTITLE ASSOCIATION ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM WA-FT-FTMA-01 530.610051-SPS-1-1 3-611048037 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. 611048037 SCHEDULE B (continued) Payment of the real estate excise tax, if required. The Land is situated within the boundaries of the local taxing authority. Present rate of real estate excise tax as of the date herein is 1.78%. Any conveyance document must be accompanied by the official Washington State Excise Tax Affidavit. The applicable excise tax must be paid and the affidavit approved at the time of the recording of the conveyance documents. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: Tax Account No.: Levy Code: Assessed Value -Land: Assessed Value -Improvements: General and Special Taxes: 2012 202104-9051-06 1205 $991,400.00 $0.00 Billed: $13,512.98 Paid: $13,512.98 Unpaid: $0.00 3. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2013. 4. Facility charges, if any, including but not limited to hook-up, or connection charges and latecomer charges for water and sewer facilities by Federal Way Water and Sewer District, as disclosed by instrument(s) recorded under: Recording No.: 8905120210 Said Notice supersedes in its entirety previous Notice recorded under Recording No. 8106010913. 5. Please be advised that our search did not disclose any open Deeds of Trust of record. If you should have knowledge of any outstanding obligation, please contact the Title Department immediately for further review prior to closing. 6. A judgment, for the amount shown below, and any other amounts due. Amount: Against: In Favor of: Date entered: Judgment Number: Superior Court Case Number: Attorney for Creditor: $115,890.42 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Tyler Ainsworth September 17, 2012 12-9-24504-1 11-2-08652-7 Aaron Lewis Adee AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. Alp - All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed_ 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM WA-FT-FTMA-01530.610051-S P S-1-13-611048037 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) COMMITMENT NO. 611048037 The Company will require the following documents for review prior to the issuance of any title assurance predicated upon a conveyance or encumbrance by the corporation named below. Name of Corporation: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company a. A Copy of the corporation By-laws and Articles of Incorporation. b. An original or certified copy of a resolution authorizing the transaction contemplated herein. c. If the Articles and/or By-laws require approval by a 'parent' organization, a copy of the Articles and By-laws of the parent. The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested documentation. 8. Any unrecorded leaseholds, right of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon the Land and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the terms. 9. To provide an extended coverage lender's policy, general exceptions A through D may be eliminated or limited after an inspection of the Land and/or review of the survey, if required, is completed. 10. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as condemned by an instrument, Court: King County Superior Court Case No.: 823293 In favor of: Lakehaven Sewer District Purpose: Sewer mains Affects: Portion of said premises 11. Agreement for Perpetual Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Recording Date: September 11, 1995 Recording No.: 9509110607 12. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: City of Federal Way Purpose: Water drainage facilities Recording Date: September 11, 1995 Recording No.: 9509110608 Affects: As described therein 13. A record of survey and matters relating thereto: Recording Date: August 15, 2005 Recording No.: 20050815900003 AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PN! WA-FT-FTMA-01 530.610051-SPS-1-13-611048037 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) 14. Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: COMMITMENT NO. 611048037 Between: Lakehaven Utility District and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Recording Date: July 18, 2007 Recording No.: 20070718001802 Regarding: Water service END OF EXCEPTIONS NOTES The following matters will not be listed as Special Exceptions in Schedule B of the policy. There will be no coverage for loss arising by reason of the matters listed below because these matters are either excepted or excluded from coverage or are not matters covered under the insuring provisions of the policy. Note A: As part of Fidelity National Title Company's commitment to the environment, we encourage the paperless distribution of our products whenever possible. To help conserve natural resources, we will automatically issue the forthcoming original policy(ies) electronically. Please provide us with a current e-mail address for the new owner and/or lender prior to closing or by emailingunit2@fnf.com. Hard copy versions maybe issued upon request. Note B: Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the insured lender, or by using Bancsery or other approved third -party service. If the above requirement cannot be met, please call the Company at the number provided in this report. Note C: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Commitment, if the policy to be issued is other than an ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17/06), or ALTA Loan Policy (6/17/06), the policy may not contain an arbitration clause, or the terms of the arbitration clause may be different from those set forth in this Commitment. If the policy does contain an arbitration clause and the Amount of Insurance is less than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitral matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Note D: Fidelity National Title Co., 3500 188th St SW #300, Lynnwood, WA 98037 Cutoff time for recording release in King County is 2:00 PM, any release after 2:00 PM will record the following day. Cutoff time for recording release in Snohomish County is 1:00 PM, any release after 1:00 PM will record the following day. Note E: There are NO conveyances affecting said Land recorded within 24 months of the date of this report. Note F: Prior to closing, we will require the completion of the attached Declaration by the parties named below to enable us to amend or eliminate questions of parties in possession, lien rights and/or other certain unrecorded matters. Parties: See vesting END OF NOTES AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA commitment (Adopted_ 06.17.2006) Printed: 01.10.13 @ 42 54P'�V• WA-FT-FTMA-01530.610051-SPS-1-13-611048037 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. 611048037 SCHEDULE B (continued) END OF SCHEDULE B AMfWCAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND T ME ■19PCATGN The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed, 01.10.13 @ 02:54 PM WA-FT-FTMA-01530.610051-SPS-1-13-611048037 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. 611048037 CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any toss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by Failure to so disclose such knowledge_ If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse daim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule 6 of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. in no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4 This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate ❑I• interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http:I ww.alta.org. END OF CONDITIONS Ittttttttttttttt� AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM WA-FT-FTMA-01530.610051-S P S-1-13-611048037 Fidelity National Title Company Order No.: 611048037-U2 Property: 34001 Pacific Hwy S Federal Way, WA 98003 3500 188th St. SW, Suite 300 Lynnwood, WA 98037 Phone: (425)771-3031 / Fax: (425)771-7910 SELLER(S) Progressive Casualty Insurance Co BUYER/BORROWER(S) To be Determined LENDER Appropriate Lender Phone: Fax: ESCROW Chicago Title & Escrow Main Contact: Adair Krieger 1360 E 9Th St #500 Phone: 216-696-5471 Cleveland„ OH 44114 Fax: 216-696-8107 Phone: Email: adair.krieger@ctt.com Fax: 1. Thank You for specifying Fidelity National Title Company Your transaction is important to us. Commitment Distribution Letter Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM by RS WA0000896.doc / Updated: 03.29.11 Page 1 of 1—611048037 Fidelity National Title DECLARATION Company Order No.: 611048037-U2 Property: 34001 Pacific Hwy S, Federal Way, WA 98003 Declarant has requested Fidelity National Title Company to issue its Policy of Title Insurance, Guarantees or Endorsements insuring an interest in, or title to, real property described in the above referenced Escrow Number (hereinafter referred to as "said property") without exception to, or providing certain affirmative insurance against certain unrecorded matters. (For Following Items, Insert "None" If Applicable, Else Provide Details.) 1. Declarant knows of no defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting said property other than as shown on the Preliminary/Commitment bearing the referenced above prepared by Fidelity National Title Company EXCEPT: 2. Declarant hereby affirms that there are no leases or no one in possession, or entitled to possession, of said property other than the vestee shown in said Preliminary/Commitment, EXCEPT: 3. Declarant hereby affirms that there are no liens or rights to liens upon said property for labor, services, materials, appliances, equipment or power furnished or to be furnished to the work of improvement which are imposed by law and not shown by the public records, whether done by an owner, lessee, sublessee or tenant, and which has not been completed within the last ninety (90) days or which is now in progress, EXCEPT: 4. Declarant hereby affirms that: a. There are no charges for assessments levied by a Local Improvement District that are not of record, EXCEPT: b. That all sewer, water, gas, electricity, garbage charges and any charges for installation, connection, maintenance or construction for the same have been paid in full, EXCEPT: Declaration Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM by RS WA00000368.doc / Updated: 10.20.09 Page 1 of 2—611048037 DECLARATION (continued) This Declaration is made to induce Fidelity National Title Company to issue its Policy of Title Insurance with respect to the above referenced Prelim/Commitment Number. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this document on the date(s) set forth below. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co BY Date Declaration Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM by RS WA00000368.doc / Updated: 10.20.09 Page 2 of 2—611048037 EXHIBIT "A" Order No.: 611048037 ForAPN/Parcel ID s : 202104-9051-06 That portion of the South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, and that portion of the North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East W.M., records of King County, Washington, lying Westerly of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99) and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 20; Thence South 01 °12'17" West along the East line of said Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1479.34 feet to the Northeast corner of said South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20; Thence North 88°24'53" West along the North line of said South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 169.96 feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99) and the true point of beginning; Thence continue along said North line North 88°45'53" West, a distance of 1143.58 feet to the Northwest corner of said South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20; Thence South 01 °14'32" West along the West line of said Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 328.83 feet to the Southwest corner of said North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20; Thence South 88°46'07" East along the South line of said North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1034.43 feet to said Westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99); Thence North 22°49'31" East along said Westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 115.81 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; Thence along said curve to the left having a radius of 2815.00 feet through a central angle of 04o2l'52" an arc distance of 214.43 feet; Thence North 71 °32'21" West, a distance of 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; Thence along said curve to the left having a radius of 2805.00 feet through a central angle of 0°20'24" an arc distance of 16.65 feet to the true point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. ABBREVIATED LEGAL: Ptn NE1/4, 20-21-4 RECORDING REQUIREMENTS Effective January 1, 1997, document format and content requirements have been imposed by Washington Law. Failure to comply with the following requirements may result in rejection of the document by the county recorder or imposition of a $50.00 surcharge. First page or cover sheet: 3" top margin containing nothing except the return address. 1" side and bottom margins containing no markings or seals. Title(s) of documents. Recording no. of any assigned, released or referenced document(s). Grantors names (and page no. where additional names can be found). Grantees names (and page no. where additional names can be found). Abbreviated legal description (Lot, Block, Plat Name or Section, Township, Range and Quarter, Quarter Section for unplatted). Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description which must also appear in the body of the document. Assessor's tax parcel number(s). Return address (in top 3" margin). **A cover sheet can be attached containing the above format and data if the first page does not contain all required data. Additional Pages: 1" top, side and bottom margins containing no markings or seals. All Pages: No stapled or taped attachments. Each attachment must be a separate page. All notary and other pressure seals must be smudged for visibility. Font size of 8 points or larger. Recording Requirements Printed: 01 10.13 @ 02:54PM by RS WA00000837.doc / Updated: 05.14.10 Page 1 of 1—611048037 9, FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL - Order No.: 611048037- PRIVACY STATEMENT Effective Date: May 1, 2008 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") respect the privacy and security of your non-public personal information ("Personal Information) and protecting your Personal Information is one of our top priorities. This Privacy Statement explains FNF's privacy practices, including how we use the Personal Information we receive from you and from other specified sources, and to whom it may be disclosed. FNF follows the privacy practices described in this Privacy Statement and, depending on the business performed, FNF companies may share information as described herein. PERSONAL INFORMATION COLLECTED We may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you on applications or other forms, such as your name, address, social security number, tax identification number, asset information, and income information; • Information we receive from you through our Internet websites, such as your name, address, email address, Internet Protocol address, the website links you used to get to our websites, and your activity while using or reviewing our websites; • Information about your transactions with or services performed by us, our affiliates, or others, such as information concerning your policy, premiums, payment history, information about your home or other real property, information from lenders and other third parties involved in such transaction, account balances, and credit card information; and ■ Information we receive from consumer or other reporting agencies and publicly recorded documents. DISCLOSURE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION We may provide your Personal Information (excluding information we receive from consumer or other credit reporting agencies) to various individuals and companies, as permitted by law, without obtaining your prior authorization. Such laws do not allow consumers to restrict these disclosures. Disclosures may include, without limitation, the following: • To insurance agents, brokers, representatives, support organizations, or others to provide you with services you have requested, and to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure in connection with an insurance transaction; • To third -party contractors or service providers for the purpose of determining your eligibility for an insurance benefit or payment and/or providing you with services you have requested; • To an insurance regulatory authority, or a law enforcement or other governmental authority, in a civil action, in connection with a subpoena or a governmental investigation; • To companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or to other financial institutions with which we have joint marketing agreements and/or • To lenders, lien holders, judgment creditors, or other parties claiming an encumbrance or an interest in title whose claim or interest must be determined, settled, paid or released prior to a title or escrow closing. Privacy Statement Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM by IRS SSCORPD0911.doc / Updated: 11.03.09 Page 1 of 2—611048037 PRIVACY STATEMENT Effective Date: May 1, 2008 (continued) We may also disclose your Personal Information to others when we believe, in good faith, that such disclosure is reasonably necessary to comply with the law or to protect the safety of our customers, employees, or property and/or to comply with a judicial proceeding, court order or legal process. Disclosure to Affiliated Companies: We are permitted by law to share your name, address and facts about your transaction with other FNF companies, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate service providers to provide you with services you have requested, for marketing or product development research, or to market products or services to you. We do not, however, disclose information we collect from consumer or credit reporting agencies with our affiliates or others without your consent, in conformity with applicable law, unless such disclosure is otherwise permitted by law. Disclosure to Nonaffiliated Third Parties: We do not disclose Personal Information about our customers or former customers to nonaffiliated third parties, except as outlined herein or as otherwise permitted by law. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY OF PERSONAL INFORMATION We restrict access to Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard Personal Information. ACCESS TO PERSONAL INFORMATION / REQUESTS FOR CORRECTION, AMENDMENT, OR DELETION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION As required by applicable law, we will afford you the right to access your Personal Information, under certain circumstances to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed, and request correction or deletion of your Personal Information. However, FNF's current policy is to maintain customers' Personal Information for no less than your state's re uired record retention requirements for the purpose of handling future coverage claims. For your protection, all requests made under this section must be in writing and must include Vour notarized signature to establish your identity. Where permitted by law, we may charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests. Please send requests to: Chief Privacy Officer Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32204 CHANGES TO THIS PRIVACY STATEMENT This Privacy Statement may be amended from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws. When we amend this Privacy Statement, we will post a notice of such changes on our website. The effective date of this Privacy Statement, as stated above, indicates the last time this Privacy Statement was revised or materially changed. Privacy Statement Printed: 01.10.13 @ 02:54PM by RS SSCORPD0911.doc / Updated: 11.03.09 Page 2 of 2—611048037 20061222002216,001 20051 22002216 FRZzD6!-ITY NAT10 WD 37.00 P2/22029060�A8 KING COUNTY, WR E21g77416 12��/22 Ol85 14:59 srrx.NTY �,15S�!006.0 PAGS00% OF 001 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Name: Fidelity National Title Co. Address: 3500 188t' Street., 5VV #300 City, State, Zip: Lynnwood, WA 98037 Document Title: Statutory Warranty Deed Grantor(s): FEDERAL WAY ASTORAGE PLACE LLC, a Washington limited liability company Grantee(s): PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation Legal Description: Rmrded at the request of FIDELITY NATIONAL THE 1. Abbreviated Legal Description: Order # PTN SE NE S20-T21 N-RaE 4e/ ! -3 -7 2. The complete legal description of the property is on page 2 of this document. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel Account No.: 202104905106 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED THE GRANTOR, FEDERAL WAY A -STORAGE PLACE, LLC, a Washington limited liability company In consideration of the sum of Ten and NO1100 Dollars ($10.00), and other valuable consideration paid, which is paid to a Quaiified Intermediary as part of a §1031 tax deferred exchange, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Conveys and warrants to GRANTEE, PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, subject to the exceptions set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, the following described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington: Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2005 20051222002216 Page 1 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:48:51 PM PST z That portion of the South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, and that portion of the North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East W.M., records of King County, Washington, lying Westerly of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99) and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 20, Thence South 010 12' 17" West along the East line of said Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1479.34 feet to the Northeast corner of said South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20; THENCE North 88° 24' 53" West along the North line of said South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 169.96 feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway no. 1 (US 99) and the true point of beginning; THENCE continue along said North line North 880 45' 63" West, a distance of 1143.58 feet to the Northwest corner of said South half of the North half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20; THENCE South 010 14' 32" West along the West line of said Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 328.83 feet to the Southwest corner of said North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20; THENCE South 880 46' 07" East along the South line of said North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1034.43 feet to said Westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99); THENCE North 221, 49' 31" East along said Westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 118.81 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2005 20051222002216 Page 2 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:48:51 PM PST THENCE along said curve to the left having a radius of 2815.00 feet through a central angle of 040 21' 52" an arc distance of 214.43 feet; THENCE North 710 32' 21" West, a distance of 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along said curve to the left having a radius of 2805.00 feet through a central angle of 00 20' 24" an arc distance of 16.65 feet to the true point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. I'uhlic Itco'14 Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2005 20051222002216 Page 3 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:48:51 PM PST DATED this a day of 2005 GRANTOR: FEDERAL WAY A -STORAGE PLACE LLC Na -e: r Its: 5TATI` OF WASH iVGTOiV ] ] ss. COUNTY OF 1 ] On this day personally appeared before me) , — to me known to be the k?L� of Federal Way A- torage Place LLG, a Washington limited HaNlity company, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said limited fiabiiity company, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. 2005. GIVEN under my hand a �OTAAY m i U dP-.� y (P p1JBL1G dtt.`.[a ataxy F blur in a r]-for tate of residing at i My cammission expires: day of Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2005 20051222002216 Page 4 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:48:51 PM PST Approved and Accepted as To Form and Content: GRANTEE: PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY By; //I,'/ %- Ron Marotto, Director of Real Estate STATE OF OHIO } SS. COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ) On this day personally appeared before me Ron Marotta, to me known to 6e the Director or Real Estate of Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, an Ohlo corporation, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and an oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ` day of-��-c.��.b� _ , 2005. 14 Na Y WIJA UJMR. 00fr7f Ohio:� On ETIre$ Nay28, 2006 ojya*a Corr� lmsn5R5�+ri Print Naymee:'�_. Notary Public in and for the State of Ql-�� 0 _r residing at My commission expires: I'ublir Rccoid Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2005 20051222002216 Page 5 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:48:51 PM PST 20051222002216:006 EXHIBIT A (1) Taxes which are a lien but not yet due and payable; (2) Terms and conditions of the Easement and Conditions contained in Cause No. SC823203 In the King County Superior Court in favor of Lake Washington Sewer District; (3) Terms and conditions of the Easement dated September 11, 1995 and recorded at document no. 96091108o7 of the King County Records; (4) Terms and conditions of the Easement dated September 11, 1995 in favor of the City of Federal Way and recorded at document no. 9609110608 of the King County Records; and (5) Matters contained on the record of Survey dates! August 16, 2005 and recorded at document no. 20050815900003 of the King County Records. j Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2005 20051222002216 Page 6 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:48:51 PM PST O V4 ll7 d QD P I �. f Notice of Additional Water or Sewer Facility Tap or Connection Charge NOTICg IS SEREBY GIVER that Federal Way Water and Sewer. of King County# Washington, intends t❑ ievy a tap or connection charge for providing water and/or sanitary sewer service to the realty be- low described. Further information regardLng the charge is Avail- able at the Akatrict 09fice at 31627 First Avenue South. Federal Way, Washington. The realty subject to the tap or connection charge is described as follows: fxhibir ".^." T:lis Notice supersedes in its entirety the "Notice of Tap or Connection Charges FureUant to RCW 65.08.170" Filed with King County. Washington under Auditor's File No. 8106010916. This notice is given pursuant to R.C.W. 65,08.170. DATED this —6` day of LPL_. _ - ._ -___ r 19�• By Federal Way Water anO Sewer B'3'G5• 11' 100210 J Q Position: CRSNSL 00 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 55 ss; County of King ) I certaEy that I Snow or have satisfactory evidence that Sze wr t„�,r�cKe. — signed this instrument, on oath state that ►ia is authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the �po.rr» c,r Pum.fr�c�+at� of FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and pur- poses mentioned in the instrument. #{ DATED: -1 f*+,' +meµ •� rr %QTA Y e A' * _ �BLfC my appointment expires � R i r 1111blir Retard Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 1 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST FEDERAL WAIF WATER AND SEWER LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" All of sections 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 91 'of 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 221 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, and 34, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M.: TOGETHER with all of Section 13, Township 21 North, kange 3 East, W.M.; TOGETHER WITH portions Of sections 17, 20, 27, 29, 29, 32, 33, {� 34, and 35, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; ri TOGETHER WITH portions of sections 2, 6, 11, 14, 230 26, 30, 31, 0 and 35, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; O TOGETHER WITH portions of sections 2 and 30 Township 20 North, Range 4 East, W.M.! TOGETHER WITH nortlons of sections 1, LO, 11, 12, 14, 15, 23, 24, and 25, TowrshLp 21 North, Range 3 East, W.M.i Mote particularly descz;bed as follDws: Bouinning at the intarsection of the north line of section 23, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., and the centerline of Grand View Boulevard, also known as 56th Avenue south; itaninteraectioa withgthe Pennsylvaniaine of Avenue,ralsoVknownoasesouthto 13 348th Place; Thence southerly along the centerline of Pennsylvania Avenue, Plaoeknown 8outh,latoouth 348th its intersection with GrandeViewth and 56th Boulevard; Thence nOut.hecly along the "nterlinv of Grand View DQUIe'vard, al4o known au 56th Avenue South and 57th Avenue South, to its iritersoction with the westerly ex:nnsion of the north line Of slackLot 24, of Of p late., pagesl2a�1 through j nrecorded m clusLvo,t rscocds aKingCour'tY, Waahingtonl he oThnce ResaideLote24ytolonsaid the northeaeterly cornertoEaion aaidand Lott24�narth line h 34 Lnciusive,Thence tafraaIdly 1Block ong h83, to the south line easterllines ote of Lot t34,u91ock 53, OZ .7ovita Hetghta; i L Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 2 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST . -2- Thence westerly along said south line of Lot 34 and the westerly extension of said south line to its intersection with the centerline of Grand View Boulevard, also known as 57th Avenue South; Thence southerly along ttte centerline of Grand View Boulevard to its intersection with the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 6, Black 146, of said Jovita Heightsr Thence eastarly along said westerly extension and said north Line of Let C to the northeast corner of said Lot 6; Thence southerly along the east line of Lots 6 through 20 to the southeast corner of Lot 20 which is also the most northerly corner at Lot 40, Block 146• Jovita Heights; he thenmostowesterly rcorner ly noftsaid northwest Lot40, said corner disoon;n the 0 northern margin of Ohio Drive, also known as South 364th Place; 'thence southerly and southwesterly along the northery margin of Ohio Drive, southeasterly llinesaof Lots o27hthrough P36ci.nClusive,airasaing idthe {r} Black 146, Jovi.ra Heights, to the southwest th Line o£ said L36; Thence southeasterly along the southeasterly extension of the southwest Line Of said Lot 36 to the centerline of Ohio Driver Thence southerly along t:ko centerline of Ohio Drive to its intersection with the southeasterly extension of the northeastern line o£ Lot 39, said northeu=stern line being South 39*47117" East L`rom the most northerly coK'rier of Lot 39, Block 146 of said Jovita Heights; Thence theas x tons Lon the westernnmacginsof cOhiolY lDrive, also ubeing tthe ysoo utheasternline of said Lot 39; Thence southerly along the said margin of Ohio Drive and the southeastern line of said Lot 39 to its intersection with the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 10, Block 145, of said .Tovita HeLght!3; Thence easterly along said westerly extension and the north Line Of said Lot 10 to the most easterly corner of Lot 10; Thence southwesterly along the south line of said Lot L0 and its southwesteuly extension to its intersection with the western margin of Oregon Drive, also known as 55th Place South; Thence southeasterly along said western margin also being portions of the eaotecn lines of Lots L5 and 16. Slack 144 Of said Jovita Heights, to the most easterly corner of said Lot 16; Public Rc=d Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 3 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST - 3 - Thence northeasterly across Ohio Drive, also known as 55th Place South, to the most northwesterly cornet of Lot 1, Block 143, of said Jovita Heights; Thence northeasterly, southerly and southwesterly along the lines of said Lac 1, also being the southern and western margins of Oregon Drive, •+hich is also known as 56th Place South, t-3 the most southerly cornee of said Lot 1; Thence continuing southerly along the western margin of Oregon Drive, also being the east line of Lots 2 and 3, Block 143, in said Jovita HeigP►ts, to the southern line of saLd Lot 3r Thence westerly along the south Line of said Lot 3 to its Intersection with the easterly line of Lot 4, Block 143, 1ovLta Heights; Thence southerly and southwesterly along the easterly line of Lots 4 through 13, inclusive, to the most northerly corner of Lot 26, Block 143, Jovita Heights; Thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of Lots 26 through 35, inclusive, to the northeast corner of Lot 35, Block 143, Jovita Heights; Thence southwesterly to a point on the northwesterly line of Lot 36, Block 143, Jovita Heights, which is 250 feet northeasterly of the southwest corner of said Lot 36; Thence southeasterly to a point on the south line of said Lot'36 which is 250 feet easterly of the southwest corner thereof; Thence South 00*13151" West to the intersection with the north Line of the south 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 35, Township 21 North, Flange 4 East, W.M.; Thence easterly along said north line to its intersection with the northerly extension of a line which is 120 feet easterly of and parallel with the west line of Lot Sr Block 18, C. D. Hilman,s Pacific City Addition to City of! Seattle, Division No. 1, according to the plat thereof unrecorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 64, records of King County, Washington. Thence southerly along said northerly extension and said parallel littb to its Lntorrection with the south line of said Lot 81 Thence westerly along said south line to the northeast corner of Lot 5 of said Blocl: Is; Thence sou-therLy along the east line of said Lot 5, a distance of 100 feerr p1 1 Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 4 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST r - 4 - Thence southwesterly to the intersection of the east line of Lot 4 of said Hlvck 1s, with a line 150 feat northerly of and parallel with the south line of said Lot 4; Thence westerly along said parallel line to its intersection with the west line of said Lot 4; Thence southerly along said west line to the southeast corner of Lot 3 of said Elork Is; Thence wes tarlk along the south line of said Lot 3 to its intersection with the northerly extension of the west line of Lot 11, uIock 17, of said C. D. Fiilman's Eaaific City Addition to City of Seattle, Divisi,Pn No. 1; Thence southerly along said northerly extension and the vest � line of said Lot 11 to its intecsection slLth rhe narthalineeofhsard L0050 feet southerly of and parallel with - (� 11 ; in Thence easterly along said parallel line to its intersection with 0 the west line of Lot to of said Block 17; Cn m Thence southerly along said west line to the northwest corner of Lot 5 of said Block 17; Thence easterly along the north line of said Lot 5 to the northeast corner thereof; Theme southerly along the east line of sold Lot 5 to the northwest narner of Lot 6 of said Block 17; Thence easterly aLong the north line of said Lot 6, a distance of 240 feeti e of id Lot 6 ThsoutheelY ence 27S feeto a easterlytofntheesouth southwestncornera which tthereof; Thenao southerly at right angles to the south line of said Lot 6, a distan.s of 30 feet to the north line of the South 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 35; Is f*etoeastorlylofathegwestdlinetoflino to a the East 1/2no£wtheit350 said Southwest 1/4; Thence southerly to a point an the north line of the south 1/2 of south 1/2 of the said Southweat 1/4 which is 450 feet easterly (as mn asured along said north Line) of the said west lire of the East 1/2 of the southwest 1/4; Thence southerly to a point on the south line of said section 35 which is 600 Eoet **.steely of the southwest corner of the said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4; Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 P11'li[ 14cr11<1 Page 5 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST N 0 C�1 C 0 an - 5 - Thence westerly along said south line of said section 35 which is also the north line of Section 2, Township 20 North, Range 4 East, W.M., to the intersection with the north margin of Puget Sound Electric Railway right-oE-way (Puget Sound power and Light Company right-of-way); Thence ;o r''lPsterly, westerly and northwesterly along the north margin of ",he Puget sound Electric Railway right-oC-way (Puget Sound Power and Light company right-oE-way) to the intersection with the north line of section 3, Township 20 North, Range 4 East, W.M., which is also the south line of Section 34, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M.: Thence westerly along the south line of said Section 34 and continuing westerly along the south line of Section 33 and section 32 to the southwest corner of Section 32, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence northerly along the west line of saLd Section 32 to the intersection with the southwestern boundary line of King County, - The -ice northwes!:erly along said southwestern boundary of icing County through section 31 and Section 30, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M.. to its intersection with the west line of said Section 30, said west line aieo being the east line of Section 25, Township 21 North, Range 3 East, W.M.7 Thence continuing northwesterly along the southuastern boundary of King County through Sections 25, 24, 23 and 14, Township 21 North, Range 3 East, W.M., to its intersection with the west line of said Section 14; also being the east line of Section 15, Township 2L North, Range 3 East, W.K.; Thence continuing northwesterly along the southwestern boundary of King County to its intersection with ehe west line of Govecameat Lot 2 in said Section 13; Thence northerLy along said west line of Government Lot 2 in said Section 15 to the northwest corner of said Government Lot 2; Thence easterly along the north line of said Government Lot 2 GE Section 15 to its intersection with the east line of said Section 19, said east line also being the west line of Section 14, Township 21 North, Range 3 East, W.M.; Thence continuing easterly along the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said section 14 to the northeast corner of said Southwest 1/4 GE the Northweet 1/4 of Section 14, said point also being the southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 ai' the 1/4 of said Section 1,4; Public Record F Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 6 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST vyi:r.:wi'+.• - 6 - Thence northerly along the west line of -said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14 to the northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14, said point also being the southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 21 North, Range 3 East, W.sl.; Thence westerly along the south line of said Section 11 to the southwest corner of said Section 11, said point also being the southeast Corner of Section 10, Township 21 North, Range 3 Bast, w.M.; Thence continuing westerly along the south line of said Section O 10, a distance of 554.34 feet; Thence northerly parallel to the east line o£ said Section 10 to e the southerly margin of Ingram Drive, also known as Southwest 316th Place, as it existed September•I, 1961, 30'feet in width; N Thence northeasterly along said southern margin Of Ingram Drive Q to a point of intersection with the east line of maid Section Cn 10, siso being the west line of Section 11, -rownship 21 North, CU Range 3 East, W.M.; Thencu southerly along the west Line of said Sectio- 11 to the northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of ! said Section 11, said poin r_ also being the southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 11) Thence easterly along the South Line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11 to the west line. of the East 1/2 of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 11s Thence northerly along said west line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 0£ said Section 11 to its intersection with the centarline of Puget Sound Marine View Drive, also known as Southwest Dash point Roads Thence easterly and southeasterly along the centerline of Puget Sound siar:ine view Drive (Southwest Dash point Road) to its intersection with a line which lies 60 feet east of and parallel to the west line of the Northeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section lxt Thence north.,trly along said line 60 feet east of and parallel to the west lino of the said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 to the East-West centeeline of said Section 112 Thence eautsrly along tha east -west centerline of Section 11 to a point 596.5E feet west of the southeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section Its r� Public Roca d Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 7 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST 7 Thence northerly along the west line ol: the east 596.65 feet of said Northwesr. 1/4 of said Section 11 to its intersection with the south line of numas Heights, according to the plat therecf recorded in Volume 63 of Plats, Gage 17, Records of King County, Washington; Thence easterly along said south line of Dumas Heights to its intersection with the eaet line of said Northwest 1/4 oe said Section Ll; Thence south along said east line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11 to the southeast corner of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, said point also being the southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of eiid section 11; Thence easterly along the south Line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11 to its intersection with the west line of Government Lot 1 of said Section 11; Thence northerly along said west line to its intersection with the south line of Lot 16, Schade Palisade Beach Estate, according to the plat thereof; as recorded in the Volume 68 of Plats, pages 51 ind 52, Records of King County, Washington; Thence west4rl.y along said south line of said Lot 16 and the south lines oC Lots 15, 14, and 13, to the most westerly line of said Plat of Schade Palisade Beach Estate; Thence northerly along said west line of said Plat of Schade Palisade Beach Estate to the line of high tide of Puget Sound; Thence northeasterly along said high tide line to its intersection with the north line of Section 12, Township 21 NQCtth, Range 3 East, W.M.; Thence easterly along the north Line of said Section 12, also being the south line of Section 1, Township 21 North, Range 3 East, W.H., to the North -South centerline of said Section It Thence northerly along the North -South centerline of Section L, Township 21 North, Range 3 East, W,R., to the Government Meander Line, also the northwest corner of Government Lot 2 in said Section 1; Thence easterly along the ,overnment Meander Line, also being the north line of Government Lot 2 and Government Lot L in said Section L, to the Meander Corner on the east line of said Section L, a1Yo being the west Line of Section 6, Township 21 North, Range 4 Bass, W.M.; Thence northerly along the west Line of said Section 6 to the line of Ext:Nma 'Low Tide of Puget Soundr Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 8 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/1O/2013 2:49:06 PM PST - a - Thence caaterly and northeasterly along said line of extrene low tide of Puget Sound to its intersection with the east line of said Section 6; Thence southerly along said east line of said suction 6 to its Intersection with the Government Meander Line, said point also being the intersection of the Government Meander Line and the west Una of Government Lot 4 in Section 5, Township 21 North, Range 4 Eazt, W.M.; Thence northeasterly along said Government meander Line to its intersection with the north line of Government Lot 4 in said Section 9, also being the south line of Government Lot 5 of Section 32, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.H.; Thence northeasterly and northerly along said Government Meander Line to !.ts intersection with the north line of section 32, Township 22 North, Range 4 Bast, W.M., said line also being the south Line of Section 29, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, SJ.H.; C Thence continuing northerly along saW Government Meander Line a�/3 to is intersection with the East-11cst eenterllne of said Section G 29; Thence westerly to the westerly line of the Second Class Tidelands of Puget Bound; Thence northerly along said westerly line of the Second Class TideLandn of Puget sound to its intersection with the westerly extension of a Line 480 feet north of and parallel with the south line of Government Lot 2 in said Section 29; Thence easterly along said westerly extension of said line which is 480 feet north of and parallel with the south line of Government Lot 2 in Section 29 to its intersection with the shoreline of Puget Sound; Thence generally northerly along !3aid shoreline fronting Government Lots 2 and 1, section 29, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.H., Government Lots l Bhrough 4, Section 20, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., and Government Lots 4, 3 and 2, Section 11, Towndllip 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., to its intersection ,+ith the south line Of the north 439 feet of said Government Lot 2, Section 17, Thence easterly along said south line to its intersection with the centecline of Marine view Drive; Thence southerly along said centerline to the centerline of South 230th Street; Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Public R%xord Page 9 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST - 9 - Thence easterly along said centerline to its interaection with the west line of the west 200 feet of Tract 50, Des Moines 2-Acre Tcacts,_accordii:g 4o the plat thereeE recorded in volume 10, page 67, records of King County, Washington, extended northerly) Thence southerly along said northerly extension and said west line to the south line thereof; Thence easterly along said south line to the east line thereof; Thence northerly along said east line and said east line extended northerLy to its intersection with the centerline of South 230th S tree h; Thence easterly along said centerline to its Intersection with the centerline of 10th Avenue South (Bay View Avenue); v4 Thence southerly along said centerline to the south line of said Des Moines 2-Acre Tracts; G Cq Thence westerly along said south line to its intersection with Td the east lints of the north 497.75 fwet of the NW 1/4 of the SW V7 1/4 of the SC 1/4 of section 11, Township 22 North, Range 4 Cn Eaet, W.M.; m Thence southerly along said east line to the mouth line thereof; Thence westerly along said south line to its intersection with the centcrline of Marine view Drive souths Thence southerly and southeasterly along said centerline to its intersection with the westerly. extension of the northerly margin of South 24Oth Street; Thence easterly along said westerly extension and said northerly margin to its intersection with the west line of the east 400 Coot of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 17y Thence southerly along said west line to the south line thereof; Thence easterly along said south line to its intersection with the northerLy extensions of the north -south centerline of Block 2, Des Moines Waterfront Addition, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 4, page 960 PAcords of King County, Washington; Thence southerly along saLd northerly extension and said centerline to its intersection with the north line of College Place. according to the plat thereof escoedad in volume 70, page 62, RacoVd., Of King County, Washington: Thence easterly along raLd north line to the east Ilne thereof; Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 10 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST 10 - Thence southerly along said east line and sand line extended southerly to the centerLine of South 242nd Street; Thence westerly along said centerline to its intersection with the northerly extension of the east line of Block 40 of said Plat of Des Moines Waterfront Addition, - Thence souLherly along said northerly extension, said east Line and said line extended southerly to its intersection with the centerline of South 244th Street; Thence westerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of llth Avenue South (Packwood street) as platted in First Railroad Addition to Des mo£nes according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 4, page 90, Records of King County, Washington; Thence southerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of South 249th Street as platted in said plat; Thence westerly along said centerline to its intersection with O the centerline of loth Avenue South; G Thence southerly along said centerline to its intersection with the north line of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.K.; QThence easterly- along said north Line to the east line thereof; C] Thence southerly along said east liie and the east line of W 1/2 of the WE 1/4 of section 29, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., to its intersection with the centerline of South 264th streor-; Thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection Mith the northwesterly extension of the west line of Lot 1 of the Plat of Wocclmont Park, Division No. 1, as recorded in volume 25 of Plats, page 48, records of King County, Washington; Thence southeasterly along said northwesterly extension to the northwest corner of Lot 1; Thence southwesterly and southerly along the west line of Lots 10 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of said Woodvsont Park, Division No. 1, and the southerly extension of the west line of said Lot 6 to its intersection with the centerline of South 268th Street; Thence eaererly along said centerline to its intersection with the northerly extension of the north -south centerline of Block 39r Woodmont Beach, according to the plat recorded in Volume 22, page 30, Re cords of King County, Washington; Thence southerly along said northerly extension said narth-south centerline, said centerline extended southerly, north -south cant+rline of block 47 of said plat to its intersection with the ;forth line of Lot 15 of said Block 47; Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 11 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST d Vq N O U 7 0 CW 11 Thence easterly along said north line along said line extended easterly to the centerline of L6th Avenue South; Tr.ence southerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of South 272nd Street; Thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of pacific Highway South; Thence southwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the north line of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the M1 /4 of Section 33, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence easterly along said north line and the north line of the j S 1/2 of the „' 1/2 of the if 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 33 to the east line thereef; I I i Thence southerly aiong said east line to the north line of the j NE 1/4 of tKe NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 33; Thence easterly along said north line to the northea.st corner thereof..; l Thence S 26*281200 E, 292.22' to the most westerly corner of Lot f 10, Unrecorced 2lat of Redondo Heights (most northwesterly corner 1 of Scarborough Division No. 2 according to plat recoicded in Volume 132, pages 47 and 48, Records ,of King County, Washington); Thence North 52416120" East :along the northwest Line of said tot 10 (northwesterly line of Scarborough Division No. 2) and its � northeasterly extension 1,138.60 feet to its intersection with P the centerline of South Star Lake Road, alaa known as King County Road No. 1969; i Thence northwazterly along the centerline of South Star Lake Road to ito intersection with a line extended southwesterly at } right angles to the northeastern margin of South Star Lake Road ; from the most wasterly corner of Lot 2 in said Unrecorded Platt Thence North 536291550 East, as measured at right angles to the northeasterly margin of Star Lake Road, a distance of 30.00 feet ++ to said northeasterly margin and said most westerly corner of i Lot 2; ! Thence North 48.57014" East, a distance of 743.27 feet along the northwest line of said Lot 2; I'Llblic Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 12 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST x;7 - 12 - Thence North 87°36'30" West, a distance of 286.48 feet; Thence North 48°57'14" East, a distance of 442.29 feet to the south margin of South 272nd Street; Thence South 87°34'30" East along said south margin a distance of 327.80 feet to the west margin of Interstate Highway No. 5; Thence northerly along said west margin 50 feet more or less to its intersection with the north line of said Section 33 which Is also the south line of section 28, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, C.M.; Thence South 87*36130" East along said south line a distance of 375 feet more or less to the northerly extension of the eastern margin of Interstate Highway No. Sr Thence southerly along the northerly extension of said eastern margin a distance of 3o feet more or less to the southerly line G of said eastern margin; NThence easterly, northerly, westerly and northerly along the 11 east margin of said primary State Highway No. 1 also known as Interstate Highway No. 5, to the north line: of the South 1/2 of the Southeac t 1/4 of said Section 28; G Thenco easterly along said north line to the east line of said Section 28 which ie also the west line of Section 27, Township 22 North, itango 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing easterly along the north Line of the south 1/2' of the southwest •1/4 of said Section 27 to the north -south centerline of said Section 27; Thence southerly along Said North -south centerline to the south line of said Section 27 and the 1/4 corner common to said Section 27 and Section 34, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence easterly along the north Line of said Section 34 to its intersection with the north margi,t of South 272nd Street; Thence easterly along said north margin to the east line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 34; Thence southerly along said east line to the south line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; Thence westerly along said south line to the North -South centerline of said section 34; Public Reeoyd Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 13 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST O d P C2 v4 in CD M an 13 Thence southerly along said North -South c�ntesline to the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 34; Thence easterly along said north line to the west Line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 34; Thence northerly along said west line to the East-West centerline of said Section 34; Thence easterly along said East -Nest centerline to east line of said Section 34 which 1s also the west line of Section 35, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence southerly along the wost line of said Section 35 to the south line of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 35; Thence easterly along said south line to the west line of the Northeast 1/4 of th9 Southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of said section 35; Thence southerly along said west line to the north line of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 35; Thence easterly along said north line to the east line of the west 150 feet of the southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 35; Thence southerly along said east line to the north line of the south 300 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of said Section 35; Thence easterly and parallel with the south line of Baia Section 35 to the east line of Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 35; Thence continuing easterly on a line extended a distance of 170 Coot to a point lying 300 beet north og the south line of said Section 35; Thence eouthecly and parallel with the west line of said Section 35 to the north line of Section 2, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, 13.M.; Thence continuing southerLy parallel with centerline of 56th Avenue South a distance of 300 feet; Thence easterly and parallel with north line of said Section 21 a distance of 90 feet; Public Record E Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 14 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST - 14 - Thence southerly and parallel witn centarline of 56th Avenue South, a distance of 150.96 feet, Thence easterly( and parallel with north line of Said Section 2 to the wont line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 2; Thence northerly along Said west line to a point lying 351.12 feet south of north line of said Section 2; Thence east along a Line 351.12 feet south of and parallel to the north line of said Section 2 to a point 1,108.8 feet west of the east line of said section 2; Thence south along a line 1,1O8.8 feet west of and parallel to the east line of said section 2 to the intersection of a line 1,236 feet north of and parallel to the south line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 2; Thence easterly parallel to the south line of said Northeast 1/4 to a point 770 feet west of the east line of Northeast 1/4 of said Section 2; %=1 Thence southerly parallel to the east line of. said Northeast 1/4 r4 to the intersection with the northern margin of Meredith Road (65th Avenue South); Thence easterly along the north margin of Meredith Road (65th Avenue South) and the easterly extension of said north margin to 0 the east line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 2; mThence southerly along said east line to a point lying 1,034.20 feet north of the southeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 2; Thence westerly parallel to the south'line of said Northeast 1/4 a distance of 1,141.00 foots Thencr southerly along a line parallel to the east line of said Northeast 1/4 to its intersection with the north line of the south 835.56 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 2; Thence easterly along said north line to its intersection with the mast line of said section 2; Thence Southerly along said east line to the northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2; Thence Continuing southerly along the east line of said Southeast 1/4 to its intersection with the north line of the south 1/2 of the Southeast L/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of aald Section 2; _-1 Public Rccerd I Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 15 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST - is - Thence westerly along said north line to its intersection with the east line of the west 130 feet of the said South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; Thence aoiatherly along said east line to its intersection with the north tine of the southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2; Thence westerly along said north line to its intersection with the east line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 0£ said Section 2; Thence southerly along said east line to its intersection with the south line of the said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; Thence westerly along said south Line to its intersection with the east line of the west 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 2; Thence southe^71y along said east line to its intersection with the south line of said Section 2, which is also the north line of Section 11, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.H.; Thence continuing southerly along the east line of the Northwest C4 1/4 of the Northeast L/4 of said Section 11 to the south line 0 thereof; CQ Thence westerly along the south line of the Northwest 1/4 oi' the Ll) G Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11 to the North -South centerline of 07 sail Section 11; RJ Thence continuing westerly along the north line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of 'said Section 11 td the west Line thereat; Thence southerly along the west line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to the Sant -West centerline of said Section 11I Thence easterly along said East-West centerline to the east line oZ the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 11; Thence southerly along the east line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 to the south line thereof. Thence continuing southerly along the east line of the Southwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of said section It to the south Line of said Section It, also being the north line of Section 14. Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Public Record I Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 16 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST 16 Thence continuing southerly along the east line of Northwest 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 of said Section 14 to the southeast corner thereof r Thence westerly along the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said section 14, a distance of 39.1 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Plat of Hi -Crest as recorded in Volume 59 of Plats, page 32, records of Icing County, Washington; Thence southwesterly along the westerly line of said Plat and Plat of Hi -Crest No. 2 as rec..)rded in Volume 64 of Plats, page 58, records of King County, Washington, to the southwest corner of Lot 9 of said Hi -Crest No. 2; Thence easterly along the southerly line of said mot 9 and the easterly projection thereof 210.0 feet; Thence South 12"55115" West to the centerline cf Ht. View Driver Thence southerly and westerly aloi.g the centerline of yt. view Drive to the west line of Southeast 1/4 of Section 14, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., also being the east line of the Southwest 1/4 said Section 14s Thence southerly along said west line 264.69 feet; Thence westerly along the easterly extension of the south line of Tract 73 and the southerly lines of Tracts 73 and 74 of West Auburn E'ive Acre Tracts as recorded in volume 15 of Flats, page 12, records. of King County, Washington, to the east line of the West 1/2 of the southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said section 14; Thence southerly along the east line of said West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 0£ the Southwest 1/4 to the south line of said Section 14, also being the north line of Section 23, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M.= Thence westerly along the north line of said Section 23 to its intersection with the centerline of Grand View Boulevard, also known as 56th Avenue South, to the POINT OF BEG iHNING. • cc: S Public Rvmyd 1 Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 17 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST FEDFU-1 WAY WATT mud SFiYaE'3t o[smCT SEWER DIVISION 0. +3, Bair 4249 Fmier:l Wsy, WA 9SO63 Public Record r—� Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1989 8905120210 Page 18 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:06 PM PST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Hon. Michael J. Trickey mez A' SEP 17 202 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING TYLER AINSWORTH, Plaintiff, V. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, Defendant. No. 11-2-08562-7 SEA FINAL JUDGMENT [mil G 1ewlv,f C' 00 tj cl a I Irk JUDGMENT SUMMARY 1. Judgment Creditor. Tyler Ainsworth 2. Judgment Debtors: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company 3_ Actual Damages, $5,458.18 4. Punitive Damages: $5,458.18 5. Attorney Fees: $ 10,3 1 cf? 0. 0'D w a -%a .rho Y c'V jtr :' a 9 y, 0 6 6. Actual : $ 7. Statutory Costs and Attorney Fees: $ • 9 8. Judgment Total: $(f9'0• ` 1- 9. Judgment shall bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum from the date of entry. 10. Attorney for Judgment Creditor. Aaron L. Adee 11. Attorneys for Judgment Debtors: Thomas Lether and Eric Neal FINAL JUDGMENT - 1 THE ADEE LAW FIRM, PLLC 705 SECOND A SNUE, SUITE 1000 Sr:ATrl.E, WASHINGTON 9e104 OR I Gil N A L FACSIMILE (206 ) 83&3330 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment ("Plaintiffs Motion") came on duly and regularly for hearing without oral argument before the Court. Having considered (1) Plaintiff's Motion, including the sub -joined Declaration of Aaron L. Adee (2) ACs%4f Mob ., do I'D-Ah6We b 05 o, 1� and the case file and records therein, it is hereby Fft as ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that final judgments is hereby entered in this matter against defendant Progressive Casualty Insurance Company in the forgoing amount. �z� V�� SO ORDERED this I-7 Jday of�"'�2012. HON. MICHAEL J. TR1 KEY 'resented by: rHE ADEE LAw FIRM, PLLC 0:L �__ � a-. Qa laron L. Adee; WSBA No. 27409 kttorney for Plaintiff Tyler Ainsworth INAL JUDGMENT - 2 f 11 THE AD£E LAW FIRM, PLL.0 705 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 1000 SEAj-i1.E, WASH(NGYON 98104 (206) 859-e81 1 FACsim1L,e (206) B3B-3330 TITLE; OF CAUSE LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT of Norco -- King County, a Municipal r� Corporation of the State of Washington, - Petitioner, a s 3 3 V 4 4 3 - — HARRY 0. SAMPLE and LEMPI D. 5 SAMPLE, his wife; IRIS STRONG; , , --- MARTIN L. SLISCO and JANE e e SLISCO, his wife; ANDREW SLISCO and SANDRA SLISCO, his s s wife; WAYNE B. KNIGHT and Oda _ =-= DAGMAR Q . KNIGHT, his wife; laT6 TRUST FUNDS GEORGE HAFFNER and JOAN HAFFNER. MEG RECEIVED p,esuRlQED his wife; ARNOLD TAHJA; SAFECO JAI TITLE INSURANCE CO., INC.; 4 _ HOOD CANAL STATE BANK; 2 WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE 17,363 5 COMPANY; V & V ELECTRICAL 5c 3 CO., INC.; METROPOLITAN FEDERAL 3 p. SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION F�31 OF SEATTLE , Inc.; H . L . FREASE .❑ and VERA FREASE, his wife; AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF TACOMA, 5 Inc.; JOHN DOE and JANE DOE, his wife; AUBURN INTERCHANGE MAY ASSOCIATES, A Limited Partner- �? 75 47— shier; PROPERTY HOLDING & DEVELOP- A47 -7.ey MENT CO . , Inc . ; ELVIN P . CARNEY and MAUDE C. CARNEY, his wife; S. Zr,JACCB A. WERLE and MARGARET WERLE, his wife; GEORGE P. DUECEY, AU JR.; PETERSON CONSTRUCTION CO., "! Inc.; BENJAMIN H. ROBERTSON and �j� _ REBA C . RICKrlAN , Respondents. SUPERIOR COURT_ KIN13 COUNTY- WASHINX-51 N CIVIL APPEARANCE ODCKET ldaf4A z z 3 � 4 4 5 I jR 7 7 e a 9 9 D D TRUST FUNDS DATE RECEIVED FROM OR PAID T❑R[CCIV[D DIIIOIJRB ED IAN 3377 4-C (take fir to al 2/7/77 King Count C7 ai 1 17,363 75 3/17/77 Parcel 3 3 0 5c Apr 1, 77 Bocek, Sawyer t ano 50.0 ti `t e� Alta T �I�,+ 71 � +r •t r1 �'�111�7 �e�.� R. �e•�k r�s �.�.�. � 3b8. .30 N jazz MAY2S. 14 k-�c -'.1S-'7'1 Z��r.Yfrt 1aICry o Lf, 417 ? — Z S -'7.7 µ m I.cd. Fn to r.s C kAo U CA z- AUG a. -TaM� e_ $ocek �aa 70 Ro�e�;fi�•Ve�zhv► � j �? � lv SUPERIOR COURT - KING COUNTY - WASHINGTON CIVIL APPEARANCE DOCKET ymt, 20mm Mr o uso�. c H ■ ems. 86"NOWa D",b a4.aa YRE F20 nus. NO. J A w 977 31 J A N 3 1 1977 J A N 3 1 1977 DEB 2 10 16 f EB 2 197-1 1 FEB 2 197 12 DEB 2IQ- /3 Feb 2,77 14 FEB 31977 I.{J FEB 71977 f� FEB 7 197 FEB 19 1b Feb 14 77 Feb 14 77 ,Feb 14 77 21 ';Feb 15- 77 {22 MEMORANDUM OIr PROCEEDINGS WRION FOR P ' 4r-F:DAVIT OF SERVICE 1.9D Affidavit of service 15.30 Appearance: Iris Strong t AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE SHERIFF'S RETURN Motion & Affidavit for order to oublish ACKN0"MJ,Z)Q1Y1P,,'� OF SERVICE — 1 ACKNON/.OF SERVICE— r ACKNOWISDG.,' liNT OF SCRVICE - V ✓ E4P C. ACKNOWsFDC,,WPIi OF SERVICI �hn3l Appearances WE arson or:s l Y By: Flon ex "rvey & Schubert � AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICF A�FIJAViT OF SERVICE ACK;,40yVLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Appearance of 'Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Co. by Robert Lynn Ber Strom AFFIDAVIT OF SEPVICE AC1CN0V+LMGMENT OF SERVICE Martin & Jane Slisco;Wayne & Aagmar Appearance4Cnight-,Andrew & Sandra Slisco;lax Stouffel 8r Knight. Motion for production SUPERIOR COURT — KING COUNTY,- WASHINGTON CIVIL APPEARANCE DOCKET a4.osa OUT L.AK£HAVEN SEWER. DISTRICT vs SAMPLE., HARRY O ET UX ET AL DATE Noa. MEMORANDUM OF PROCEEDINGS Feb 15 77 23 Memo of piaintiff F E B 1 7 W7 xC o> COURT DOCKET MINUTE') COURT REPORTER 1 E B 1 7 1577 i EX PARTS M0t1d rb ac . Feb 25/77 124 Motion for reconsideration Feb 25/77 25 Notice of presentation Feb 25/77 Feb 25/77 26 Petitioner0a memo of suRpl authority Feb 25/77 Court docket minutes -Bever 2 Feb 25/77 Anne Duncomb Report erVol.# .-3� r Mar 14, 77 --- Exhibits Filed Mar 14, 77 27 Witness Time Sheet Mar 14, 77 28 Order re exhibits & Unopened de os. OR 1 4 Wy - - COURT DOCKET MINUTES) _fir -2. L COURT REPORTER 1 c if i Order rescinding order dismissing petition for Mar 14 77 29 a ro ri-.ion Mar 15 77 30 Acceptance of offer (Parcel # 3) May 15 77 31 Authorization for payment Mar 17 77 32 Decree of appropriation (Parcel #3 ) //1330.03 Apr 1, 77 331 Notice of Presentation i~1ar 31. Apr 1, 77 34 Aa udication'of Public'Use & Necessit'y May 26 Apr 1, 77 35 Jury Demand (12) APR 6 W? i6 Affidavit. of puLlicatiul, 47.26 SUPERIOR COURT - KIN13 COUNTY - WABNINOTON CIVIL APP"#tANCE DOCKCT CI'L4GtR �n C. � cdM i6ly- CHID t�. 8 23293 ra { i ? OATS sum. MEMORANDUM OF PROOEE01NOB - 1. No. property to be condemned (Parcel 4) 11 77 37 Stipulation f.or ismnediate osseasion &use of A r Apr 11, 77 38 Association of counsel Hillis,rPhilli s et al Apr_14 77 39 Sti fat x adiste Possession d Use Apt 19, 7 40 ~Stip- for Immediate Possession Uxe Apr 27,77 41 Affidavit of Elaine s racer Apr 27,77 42 Motion to compel exthan a of appraisals Apr 27,77 43 ''Note for motion docket _May 1-1 A r 27 77 44 biemor of authorities _,�Er 27 77 45 Motion for order authorixin de osisi a er S A r 27 77 46 Note for motion docket Ma 11 { Association of Dogle & Gates A r 27 77 47 as att s for Lait�ifP Mgy 4,77 46 Order for Distribution of Funds `May 4,77 49- Motion to Authorize Deposing of Experts may 4,77 50 Note for Motion Docket t,�•y 9, 77 51 Notice of oral exam. it AY 1 ► 1977 DAILY MOTION MINUTiS ..__. ,. �-1r'q 5tip, for i t P see Ion& 1 55� Sr p • for Taalaediate Possession & Use May 12, 77 56 order authorizing depos. tlay ' 2; -77 57 order of ivamediate us 8�1�a*s��-�- Parcels SUPERIOR COURT -ICING COUNTY - WASHINGTON CIVIL ^ppLm ANCE OOCKE•t Nr�i1 i.i►iii:iY.rYE1r :,.:17i� : 1)I.:'1'.�IIC,T' � �J 9_ �r DATE sun. ' MAH iMGROUM OF PRO,r.EEOIMW Na,y 12, 77' 58 Order to ;lint el MAY 1 3 197 NOTICE OFF ORAL EXAM. MAY i s 1977, 4191 AME.14DED blaTICE OF ORAL E)U A1,:- MY 1 9 197i CORRESPONDENCE MAY 1 B NOTICE OfORAL EXAM. MAY 1 7 1977 1 NOTICE OF ORAL EXAM, Y 191tCD�B� Decree of Appropriation May 26 77 66 Order for immediate use &, possession &distribu- Order reducing property rights condenmed 17 V7 67 June 28 77 68 Decree of appropriation --Parcel 2. 137790 June 29 77 69 Decree of appropriation -Parcels 9 & 10 137852 July 12 77 .70 Order modifying judgment & tax statement-Parte19 July 12 77 71 Order modifying judgment & tax 51:atement-Parce12 JvL SATISFACTION OF Ji _DGMENT JUL 2 5 197SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT J U L 2 5 1,977 1 q DMESPONDENCE Jun 8 78, 75 Decree of Appropriation, parcels 6,7,8 11 & 12 Jun 15,78. 76 Order Modifying Judgment & tax statement SUPERIOR COURT • ICING COUNTY - WAS_ HINGTON CIVIL APPEARANCE ' DOC KET ROMENINWOMW r riI l PM 3 : 46 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING 6 LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT of } 7 icing County, a Municipal } Corporation of the State of 8 Washington, Petitioner, ) No. 823291 9 ) V. j DECREE OF APPROPRIATION 10 } AS TO PARCEL NO. 3 HARRY 0. SAMPLE and LEMPI D. ; 11 SAMPLE, his wife, et al, ) 12t Respondents.' 131 The above -entitled cause has been intiated by petitior 14: and petitioner having made an offer of the sum of $3,604.50 151 to Respondents, GEORGE HAFFNER and JOAN HAFFNER, his wife, 16 regarding Parcel No. 3 as just compensation to be paid in the event of settlement, as full payment for all interest to be 17 acquired by petitioner in the property described as Parcel No. . 18 on Exhibit "A" -attached to the Petition herein and said Rea- 19 pondents having accepted said offer, now therefore 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AIM DECREED that the 21 Clerk of this Court pay to GEORGE HAFFNER and JOAN HAFFNER, his 22 wife, the sum of $3,604.50 deposited by the Petitioner herein 23 in this cause for Parcel No. 3, and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Peti 24 tioner is and shall be the owner of the real property rights to 25 Parcel No. 3 as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached to the Petiti 26 for Appropriation herein. 27 DONE IN OPEN COURT this LZday of 1977 01 28 Presented b Dec. of Apex - ' priation as a n oc �j2D East it �n �] to Parce 1 3 9Atrorney for Petiti er��`t rRLKF 095 ,�° �"'�"'" I' wuh,zm, riahinpar, 9�z 0 Um erg -ear . p. wow 0 M � I � ?,251 AGREEMENT FOR PERPEWAL EASEMENT This Agreement for Perpetual Easement ("Agreement") is dated effective this 3rd day of August, 1995 and is entered into between the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City") and Robert L. Wright, an individual, ("Wright"). A. The City intends to construct and mmintain the Hittn Corner/south 336th regional detention and wetland/stream restoration project ("Project") as a public project located an real property within the City; H. Wright owns real property within the City, portion(s) of which are required by the City for its ProjeotF C. The City has notified Wright that the City has fined to cgpogW an Interest in the Wright property for the Project; and D. It is in the best interest of Wright and the City to reach a voluntary agreement regarding the transfer of the property from Wright to the City without the need Car condemnation litigation, if the parties oan agree to the terms and conditions of such transfer. NOW, THIEREVORE, the City and Wright enter into this Agreement for good and valuable consi.deremtion, the suffieiency and adequacy of which is acknowledged, in older to effect an appropriate property interest transfer to the City on the following harms and conditions: 1, Zgenmene Arras. Wright shall convey at closing a permanent exclusive easement to the city by fully executing, delivering and recording an easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit. "A" and incorporated herein by this reference ("Permanent Easement"). The Permanent Easement affects the Wright real property tax parcel 202'104--9051 as legally dBscrlbed and as drawn in Exhibit "B", pages 1 and 2, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference ("Property"). 2. Purchase Price. The City shah pay, by certified check, to Wright the sum of Four Hundred Fifty-Thras Thousand Pine Hundred Eighty -Nine Dollars and sixty -Eight cents ($453,569.69) at closing. 3. Title. 3.1 condition of Title. Title to the Permanent Easement is to be free oY all encumbrances or defects other than general exclusions and exceptions approved by the City. Encumbrances to be discharged by Wright shall be paid by Wright on or before closing, EXCISE TAIL NOT REQ+UI o -1 8 M Public -ft ORIGINAL Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 1 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:28 PM PST r M .. 3 . 2 T it�e_T13 S3T n a. ache City shall, at the City" a expense, inmediate-IY upon execution by the: Parties to this Agreement, aPPlY } for an AI,TA standard form Of owner's policy of title insurance issued by Stewart 'title Company of Washington, rna. The { preliminary commitment thereto, and the title policy to be issued, 1SFs11I shall cant&:Ln no excoptione other than general exclusions and f exceptions approved by the City. If title cannot be made so insusea.ble prIcr to the closing date, this Agreement skull be terminated. The city may elect to waive any such defects or enoumbrances. 3.3 Put a EncM012KAnC42s. Wright shall be prohibited from encumbering' the Permanent Easement in any manner following the full execution of this Agrearnent. i t 4. closing. 4.1 mpg, This gale shall be cloeaa on or before septemiosr 8, 1995 after the eity's satisfaction of the contingencies set forth in section 5.1 herain, or at Another time agreed to in writing by the parties; provided, however, that the 0 partxcs agree to Qxtend the closing date for an additional two (2) W weeks if the need for such extension exists in order for the City = to satisfy the contingencies. 4.2 d c roratia�. Each party shall pay its own closing costs. Wright shall pay any real estate excise tax dj and revenue stamps. Parties shall pay those standard cloning pasts accruing to the date of closing an or before the date Of Closing. Upon closing, Wright will promptly apply Per and diligently Pursue appropriate reevaluation with the King county Assessor of that } portion of the Property subject to the Permanent Easelnant_ The city shall support such reevaluation by writing a letter to King County and agreCn to pay to Wright at least ten (1 adratemnnte clue and after receipt Of a copy of the King County xs the pro rata portion of the real property taxes applicable to the fair market, value of the Permanent rascment area equal to 34.6% of the total taxes owed on the Property from closing until the first half, 1996 payment_ upon such reQvaivation, and any refund issued by the King County Assessor, wright shall pay to the city the monies the city previously paid for such real property taxes. The City's obligation to pay such taxes 'terminates on April 30, 1995 regardless of whether or not Wright has obtained the requested reevaluation. 4.3 pSpsesami__4__rl. The city shall be entitled to possession of the Permanent Easement at closing. S. Conti vends-. 5.1 The o The City'a obligations under this Agreement are aQrsclitioned upon and eub3QCk to the City's -2- 1'etUli� RccurJ Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 2 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:28 PM PST 0 L: _ satisfaction, in its solo c1lacration, or the Cityrs written waiver of the following contingencies: (a) Final approval of this Agreement by the City council of Federal Way; (b) The absence of any violation, for which notice has been given, Of federal, state or city laws i.naluding without, limitation, all City codes, ordinances. resolutions, regulations, standards and policies, as now existing or hereafter adopted or amandod, effecting the use, occupancy or condition of the Permanent Easement; (c) The pendency or threat of any litigation or proceeding relating to the Property and/or the Permanent Easement; or (d) Any material changes in the Property, the Permanent Easement or the improvements on the Property occurring after the execution of this Agreement. 5.2 contingency Period_ The City shall have three (3) weeks following exa--auti.on of this Agreement in which to notify, pursuant to section 15.9, Wright that it has satisfied, has waived satisfaction of the contingencies or has elected to terminate this LV Agreement pursuant to such contingencies. a w 5.3 c),n of CQn-P-Ingenpy PQrigd- If Wright does not w G receive the notice required by section 5.2 prior to thee closing date, this Agreement shall terminate. 477 6. city AeSte ca,iomont Conditlolas. Wright may utilize the Permanent Easement area consisting Of approximately 173,613 square feet in complying with any oxisting or future city code requiramontn for open space, green Felt, or maximum lot coverage, as a result of Wright's development on the Property. v. Li� -Q. Wright hereby grants a license to the city, its agents or representatives to enter upon the remaining Property legally described irk Exhibit 'IC" to Lalace soils excavated for its Project as an engineered fill on the Property, to use: the Property for a temporary earthwork disposal area, a temporary interceptor di.tnh and for a temporary stockpile area, eubjocC to the following terms and conditions: a) Filling of the Property shall be pursuant to the grading and fill plan attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporatod herein by this reference (11Plan") and pursuant to the termer of any permit issued based upon the Plan. The city rlhall, at its cost, satisfy any condition of mitigation, restoration and/or :replacement resulting from this grading/filling. The city agrees that the --3 - 1 i'nh]ir Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 3 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST b) : C) O r9 C7 0 M apeGifications delivurmcl to Wright on Tuly 31, 1995, will be usod by the city in bidding at this project; provided, however, that Wright shall have no independent cause of action or claim pursuant to such specifications. The city shall have no obliga,Ion to place rill on the Property exceeding the usable fill resulting from it caxcavatiion. The city shall determine what fill is usable in its sole discretion. The City shall have no obligation to construct any structural components or improvements in connection with placing such Lill and/or to incur any additional costs other than moving the available fill from the Project and placing it on the Property pursuant, to the Plan and pursuant to all por-mits. By Wright's. execution or this Agreement, he acknowledges receipt and his approval of the Plan. Wright agrees to indemnify, dererid and hold the city harmless from and against any and all liabilities, claimp or damages (including attorney fees and costs) resulting from the field condition and structural suppert characteristics of the existing fill on the Property. d) This license grants to the city control of t..he Property during the City'a grading and filling activities. Any use by Wright of the Property shall in no way interfere with the City's use Of the prcperty. will on the Cityrs complotion lotionoficthee grading revoke and ufilling activity; provided, However, that such revocation will not affect the city's right or reasonable access to the permanent Easement ova= and acrOes the Property to enable the city to exercise its rights pursuant to the Permanent Easement- g. to Qr City shall px'ovide in its Project sufficient storage volumes to handle treated storm water discharges from the Property under a maximum developed condition_ Accordingly, the city agrees that Wright, his heirs, assigns and/or successors, shall not be required to provide: any on -site reterttiars/detentian facilities for storm water on the Property as a r.9sul4_- of his initial development and the city shall provide much compensating storage within Its Project; provided, however, that the city makes no such accommodation for any redsval.opment of the proarty ith all. applicablenCity Codes d such v and pcondltiions. Wright, ment will be ahis heirto s wassigns and/or, successors, shall install at Wrightrs expense, facilities for direct di.echarge of ts'eatect storm water from the PZ E rty t❑ the city*s Project. 9, permits. The City is currently seeking varioun permits and other governmental licenses as a condition precedent to .-4 _ Public RccoH Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 4 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST 1 a M constructing its Project. Tkie City skull review and amend as necessary all project permit applications no later than December 31, 1595 to assure all permits and approvals }awing applied for will allow and authorize the work and/or activities described in sections 7 and 8 of this Agreement. 10. Permit _Prsac-45!esirzcr. In the event Wright, his heirs, asnigns rind/or auccesoorn, applies to the City for permit(e) to develop the Property, this city agrees to reasonably expedzte the processing of any suati complete application; provided, however, that such application will be treated in the same manner as other city applications. The City is ]bound in such processing to fully effect the terms and conditions in Section 6 of this Agreement. Nothing in this Section or in this Agreement relieves Wright of his obligation to comply with all applicable laws, codes, rules, regulations and/or permitting reguiroments. 3J. Mr, ight I a r �e3nt ion an _warrant���. 11.1 wright acknowledges that: it is WrighM s obligation, at his sole cost and ©xpense to comply ar ensure compliance with all federal, state, foreign and local laws or administrative orders with respect to the envirenrnQntal cp conditions existing on the Permanent 8rasgment at closing. a *y 11.2 ems. Wright represents and warrants that the ply Permanent rasernent is not subject to any leaoos, tenancies or O rights of persons in possession. 11.3 Nv Hat:eria]. defect. Wright is unaware of any material defect in the Permanent Easement. 12. n tr at' -Grading. In the event any per., is issued by the City for development of the Property. and the City enters into a contract with Wright for Wright to perform the grading work described in the grading permit, Wright, his heirs, assigns ana/or successors may conduct, at his expense, grading/filling beginning at his eastern boundary consistent with the terms and limitations of trio c:ityrs grading/filling permit as necessary to establish proper grades/foundation. 13. Dn._aftirncx. This Agreement has been mutually draEted by the parties and in the event of any dispute, teL-ms and conditions will not be conotrued or applied against any party as a drafter. 14. survival 2K Varxanties. The terms, Covenants, Xespa emcc�ntatyona and warranties contained in thiea Agreement shall not merge in the Permanent Etasement, but shall survive the closing. 15. Ganernl Gvnditinrls. 15.1 Pprf!2jZM Cp• Time is of the essence to this Agreement. —5— Poblic Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 5 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST • 15.2 ir.e Agreement. Thies Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement and no prior agreements or undercatandinga pertaining to any such mattcarm shall be effective for any purpose. 15.3 No provision of this Agreement may be amended or added to except by agreement in writing signed by the parties. 15.4 Full Force and Meet. Any provision of this Agreement which is declared invalid, void or illegal steals in no way affect, impair, or invalidate any other provision hereof and such other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 15.5 Govern sri�{ 3Yt- rhis Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with tho laws of the State of Washington. Is.6 captions. The respective captions of the paragraphs of this Agreement are insortnd far conveniance of roParencC only and shall not be deemed to oodiey or otherwise affect in any respect any of the provisions of this Agreement. 2.5.7 Authority to__Exe_etLtg. Each party warrants that it has specific authority to execute this Agreement. 15.8 Recording. Upon full execution, this Agreement shall be recorded with the icing county Department of Records. 15. 9 Notices . Any notices requirecl to be given to the parties shall be delivered to the partieez at the following addresses either personally delivered or by depositing the notice in the United states mail, postage prepaid (any notice so pocked shall be deemed received three (3) days after the date of Mailing): City of Federal Way, c/o Londi K. Lindell, city Attorney, 33530 lat Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003, and Robert L. Wright, c/o HAGGARD LAW OFFICE, IBM Bldg., Suite 1200, 1200 Fifth Ave., Seattle, WA 98101. WRIGHT CITY OF FEDERAL WAY a municipal corporation of the state of Washington 17 Ra e t Wr i ennnth E. tlyyJ�ar c/o HAGGARD LAW 'TCE Its: City Manager' IHM Bldg., suite 1200 33530 lut Way South. 1200 Fifth Ave. Federal Way, WA 9a003 Seattle, WA 98101 -6- I Pulslic Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 6 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST ertr,mr J:. ATTES ' C y C @2}C, N. C Y et @ Green, CMC "PROVED AS TO FORM: Ci ty Attorney, Lon L n ell ii Vi **,e,k,t,k*WAw�Y til,k,k l4 tiF lY yFi*ik iY dY �Y rl STATE OF WASHINGTON 88. f (INDIVIDDAL VOTARY] j COUNTY OF KING ) I � i On this day personally appeared before me, the undersigned Notary public in and for the state or Washington, duly =ommieaioned and sworn, Rotcert L. Wright, to me known to be the individual I described in snd who executed the foregoing instrument, and on oath swore t1hat he executed the foregoing instrument as his free and -voluntary act and dead for the uses and purpones therairt =antloned. GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of • 1995. (notary signature) Czyped/pwlmed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the state of Washington My COMM10sion expires: i -7- 0 ��.wn�M-- -awl t �i Public Record j Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 7 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST a I ATTEST: City Clerk, N. Chz at ne GrCen, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CO 0 �i STATE OF WASHINGTON• ] U3 ) es. CTNDTVSDUAL HCTAAY] ?J COUNTY OF KING an this day perronally appraararl 6efdtr3 mfi , the undersigned N¢ta=y Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissianecl and sworn, Robert L. Wr-ight, to me known to be the individual dascrlbed in and who executed the foregoing Instrument, and on oath swore that he oxQcutod the forogning instrument as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and pu:rpnses therein ta`e�tianed _ G y-/ hang and official G this --5 day o 1995. natfaxey �s/grn u _''�' .•Lug F fi1' f ":�! ed (�YEx P 3 r n E3d name or Hater `. Notary Public in d for 1-h st aJe Washington PS -- My commiso??6n astgireo : 4 f dr >>S'ar�• Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 -7- is Page 8 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST . ... .. .. .. - . , .. , - '"r• � ._ .. . ,. - ... �.:� „ . - •:ems:•: .- STATE OF WASHINGTON } 938. Pi?i+.'ef COUNTY OF KING ) on thIs day pereonnily appeared laefore; me, the undersigned Notary Public in and Eor the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, Kenneth E. Nyberg, to me known to be the City Kanager Of the City or Federal %a.y, a Washing on Municipal corporation, the ❑orparation that executed tho foregoing instrument, and aoknewledcxed the maid instrument to ba the free and voluntary rant and deed of said corporation, for the unea and purposea therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he war+ authorized to execute the said instrument. nn GIVEN my hand and official seal this •. �� day of 1995. _ V+ •a•.H,,tia dry 0 uSre) y a gdntrr7a� �I(In�Eo�.ahr no, ped/prenano ' tyaryj ¢ +� + Notary Public in and for the State no of Washington. G ar WAgtl � tI'%%-t} My commission expires: � � Ki �dx uaen[�rrlyhl7.f in :lS 6.37.45 i77.09A> CJ7 - a- 1 Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 9 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST w I 0 EXHIBIT NIAo FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF; I+ City of Federal Way 1 MAIL To.- -ivy Of Feaornl way •�`'• 23530 lit Way 6quth Fodvral Nay, WA 98003 { ATTNi Jeff Pratt EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE rACXLZTIE9 FOR 33GTlt/KITTB CORNER PRGTECT For and Conoldo7ration of ana Dollar ($1.00) and Other value)' consideraticn, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Robert L. Wright, an -individual, ("Grantor") grbntzl, conveys and warrantn to the CITY ❑F FEDERAL WAY, a Washington r•Munioipal Corporation +'Grantee") for the Purposes hereinaftar set forth a porpetual exclusive easement under, serous and aver certain real property (the F'property") located in Foderal Way, W.34s;lington. legally described as follows: r-1 [See. Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.] t? Except as may be otherwise set Earth herein, Grarizae •s rights shall + be exerci6ed Qnl]r upon that portion of the Property (l*Easement i Area") legally described as boliows; [see Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.] 1.Purpose. Grantee and its agents, designees and/or assigns shall have the exc3lusive perpetual right, without prior notice to Grantor, at such times as deemed noonssary by Grantee, to enter upon the Nasement to inspect, construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, :repair, replace, grade, excavatd and einlarge a11 surface water drainage faciliti.os including, but not limited to, underground facilities :and/or systems upon and under the Easement Area, ta9ot>her with all necessary or canVollient aPpurtenancea thereto, including witheut limitation, pipes, catch basins, retention and detention facilities, ponds, biofiltration swales, diLQhes, water quality treatment facilitieo vaults anti semi -buried or ground mounted facilities ("Faoil3tios^). Grantee shall hetve the right tO fiend the Easement Area and to engage in any and all activities as if Grantnca owno fee title to the Easement Aria. Following the initial construction of the facilities, Grantee may 4- Public Rceurd Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 10 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST eel Q 4" 1 0 from time to time construct such additional facilities or improvements as it may require within the Easement Area. 2. gr c�r�_ . Grantee shall have the right or reasonable acce99t to the Easement Area over anc9 across the Property to ena)3je Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder. 3. 19-12structionP_; 9- Grantee may remove any and all vegetation, trees, Or other cbstructionax Within the Easr3ment Area, and may level and gxvade the Easement Area. q. Qrentor•s Usa Qf- Easement. Thie Easement ohall bia excLusive t4 Grantee; provided, however, Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement Area in Order to comply with City code requireme-nts for open space, greenbelts or maximum Tot aoverage; and provided further Grantor may install, at its expenae, such face lties as reasonably necessary to provide for direct discharge of treated storm water from the Property to the Easement Area in compliance with all applicable laws And after obtaining all necessary pewits; and Grantor may install landscaping in the Porgyanent Easement if the City apprcvos such installation and ,after obtaining all necessary permits and approvals in compliance with all applicable laws. Further, Grantor ahall not parrorm digging, tunnelling or other form of construction activity on the Property, which would disturb the compaction or unearth the Facilities on the Easement Area, or endanger the lateral support to the Facilities. Grantor shall not blast within fifteen < 5) feet of the Easement Area. S. te. The rights and obligations of the partied shell inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective succeK6ors, heirs and aesighs. 6. Grantor shall maintain the Eanamant Area free of all enouinbrancea and defects and is prohibited from recording or taking any action Which rosulta in the recording of any lien, encumbrance or other detect against the Easement Area. DATED this day of GRANTOU : WRIGHT By Robezt r.. wr ght 1995. GRANTEES cXwY OF FEDERAL WAX, a Washington Municipal. Corporation By Kenneth E. Nyberg Xts City Manager -7r Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 11 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST r LJ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) as. [INDIVIDUAL NOTARY] COUNTY OF KING ) On thie day pernonally appeared before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and Cor the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, Robert L. wright, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the raregoing instrument, and on oath swore that he executed the foregoing} instrument " his frea and voluntary act and deed for the uses and pu7rpoaee therein Mentioned. GIVEN my hand and official deal thin _ day of , 1995. �i. (notary a gnature) � ;I (typed/Printed name of notary) , Notary Public in and for the state or Washington My commission sxpit•69e STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) sa. COUNTY OF KING ) 4 fi on this day personally appeared taefdre ma, the undersigned • j Notary Public in and for the state of Washington, daly c0T=iasi0n0d and sworn, Xannath E. ]Nyberg, to me known to be the City Manager of they City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the void instrument to be the free and voluntary act c and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein j mentioned, and on oath staffed that he Was authorized to execute the said instrument. GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of r 1995. (notary signature) typed pr nted name CC nc cry) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires: K. N000WYKTNWR I GXT.&AS 9/01/95 -3- I Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 12 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST to V4 tM O :a7 0 0 E9KEFMr'"A" TO PIEPJV N T EASEMENT - WRIGHT That portion of the south half of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, and that portion of the north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in icing County, Washington, lying westerly of Primary State Highway No. l (US 99) and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast comer of said Section 20; thence south 01' 12' 17" west along the east line of said northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1479.34 feet to the northeast corner of said south half of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence north 88'24'53" west along the north line of said south halt' of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 169.96 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99) and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along said north line north 88'45153" west, a distance of 1143.58 feet to the northwest corner of said south half of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence south 01' 14'32" west along the west line of said southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 328.83 feet to the southwest comer of said north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence south 88'46'07" cast along the south line of said north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1034.43 feet to said westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99); thence north 22'49'31" east along said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 115.81 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left having a radius of 2815.00 feet through a central angle of 04"21'52" an arc distance of 214.43 feet; thence north 71'32'21" west, a distance of 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; thence aione. said curve to the Left having a radius of 2805.00 feet through a central angle of 0'20'24" an arc distance of 16.65 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEG ENNING. t:: %dwuuwrt{wdShMjt Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 13 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST • CLJ Eli IDU "E" TO Pr-.�ENT EASEMENT - VMIGHT The west 528 feet of the following described property; That portion cf the south Itatf of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section Z0, and that portion of the north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarwr of Section 20. Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying westerly of Primary State Highway No. 1 (EIS 99) and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast comer of said Section 20; thence south 01' 12' 17" west along the cast line of said northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1479.34 feet to the northeast comer of said south half of the north hat of the i` north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section Zit; LD thence north 88`24'53" west along the north line of said south half of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of ,�-t 169.96 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of Pr;mar'y State Highway No. 1 (US 99) and the 'TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along said north line north 88°45'53" west, a distance of 1143.58 feet to the northwest earner of said south half of the north half of the north half of the Southeast quarter of the northmst quarter of Section 20; tiaence south 41 ° 14'32" west along thr, west line of said southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distartcc of 328.83 feet to tho southwest corner of said north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast groaner of the northc';aSt quarter of Section 20; thence south 88146107" east along Llte south line of said north half a the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1034.43 feet to said westerly right -of --way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99); thence north 22149131" Cast along said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 115.81 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left having a radius of 2815.00 feet through a central angle of 04°21152" an arc distance of 214.43 feet; thence north 71 "32.21" west, a distance of 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the Ieft having a radius of 2805.00 feet through a central angle of 0*20'24" an arc distsnca or 16.65 feet to the TpXfH POINT OF REGINl ING. k:ldwmawrulw ri0o sw.1y1 I'nhlic Record ... Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 14 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST 0 M do }� gore "B" - TO At".titigKmT Legal Dewkipttoa 0 That portion of the south half of, filee fsorth tsalf of the north !calf of rise southeast quarter ` of Elie nea orthst Quarter of Section 20, and that portion of the north half of the south half of the north half of the Southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20. Township 21 Worth, itange 4 Est, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying westerly of Primary State Highway No. i (US 99) and more particularly described as follows: Cornmencing at the northeast comer of said Section 20, thence south 01' 12'17" west along the east line of said northeast quarter of Section 20, a ;6 distance of 1479.34 foot to the northeast corner of said south half of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of lttc northeast quarter of Section 20; r} thence north 88'24'53" west along the north Iine of said south half of the north half of f the north half of die southeast quarter of tilt northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of = it 159.96 Poet to the westerly right -of -tray dins of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99) ,d lr x, and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; I thence continue along said north line north 88'45'53" west, a distance of 1143.58 foal to C= the northwest earner of said south half of the north half of the north hair of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; Cl) thence south 01 `14'32" west along the west line of said southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 328.83 feet to the sou6west comer of said north half cn Of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of 1}I Section 20; thence south 88`46'07" cast along the south line of said north half of the south half of 1 the north half of the southeast quarter of die northeast quarter of SectlRn 20, a distance of 1034.43 feet to said westerly tight -of --way line of Primary State WShway No. I JJS 99), s thence north 22'49'31" east along said westerly right-of-way llrte, a distance of 115.81 feet to the beginning of a Curve to the left; dtenco along said curve to the left haying a radius of 2815.00 feet &Weigh a central angle of 04'21'52" an arc distance of 214.43 feet; thence north '11'32'22" west, a distance of 10.00 feet to the beginning of a carve to the left; thence along said curve to the left haying a radius of 2805.00 foot through A central angle of 0°20'24" an are distance of 16.65 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEG114NING. i 8>cLtLiC Ra", Page I of 2 Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 15 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST ES dS 'i REP..- � Jad pc UD 3 a w r 17 AM, ff IT Public Rt:md Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 16 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST E=9� F' y O 49.4 W4 Q r1? tr�XT „ti" TO A LICMSE AREA 1"AIL DESCRUMUM That portion of tim south half of the north half of the aarth half of tiro southeast quarmr of the: northeast quartex of Section 20. and thU portion of the north half of tiles south half of the north tielf of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarto Of Section 10,-T4'ownsh4p 21 North. Rango 4 host, 1N.1v1., in King CaLLnty. Washington, lying westerly of Primary State yrghway No. 1 (US 99) and more paxticuinxiy de=ibcd ae fe'llaws: C,ommenoing at the northeast oomer of said SoDdon 20. thrnoe south 01'12' 17" west along the east line of said northeast guartex of Scxtlon 20, a distance of 1479-34 feet to the northeast conies of sold south half of the north half of tba north half of the southeast gw-sster of the northeast quarter of 5oation 20; then= north 88°24*53" west along the north Line of said south lutlf of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter cf the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 169.95 foot W the westerly right-of-way line of Primary States highway NO. 1 (US 99) a"d tbe. TRTJE POINT OF BEGINNING: thence continue along v-id north line north $8'45'53" west, a distance of 1143.58 feet to the northwest corner of s-.ud south half of tho scorch half of the north half of the southeast qumlr-,r of the northeast quarter of Section 29; thence south 01'14'32" west. along the west lino of said southeast quartet of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 328.83 ferx to the southwest corner of said north half of the South half of Cite north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence 59trth 88`4007" east slang the south line of said north half of the south half of the north Ito of the southcast quarter of the norti:wcst quarter of Section 201 a distnnr_c of 1034.43 feet to said waste rl y right -of --way line of Frimaty State M9lttvaY Nti. 1 (US 99); thence north 22149131" east along said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 115.81 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left having a radius of 2915.00 fW through a cetttr l single of 04121'52" an arc distance of 214.43 feet; thence north 71'32'21" west, a distance of 10-00 fact t0 the beginning of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left having a radius of 2805.00 fete through a txmrttral angle of 0020124" an arc distance of 16.65 fret to the TRUE POINT OF BF - GINNING - Except the west 528 feet thereof. ecmpw.9.doo Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 17 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST r� ( i • ra•on'no �; � ,_ •. .~ � � � :'! !,, f �S? � •• �i cec uNa Y�ICLL �. R - • • �� , YPE:1• •'r { rr 'r'�• -� ti.._ * :,. T 1..�... � ` f 12"'PCP. •••. 15 .:,•......r �.-. ems.. -..5� .��� r .. .• I PC Cp +• •R -� ' der• '11• .l �~-.�1' j• I-'.1�� ••C I4 h �£ dr ! �•�� ~`� 111"F ��. �� i � 1� •1�1�f ..�•".`. •< <.;1•' r�l'. �. • � �..�_, � � l � `�i �6..i � x w o1;� J^'� tic. rl +' 1 - ! • i .� op `^,�_.�F •`-�- ••..•tom _ e �����_/•''� `� pph i S, EAU WFFER + -85 �• •7 � � r % rXE977 OF ■ I -8 72 ` �••] 1 • + •i . i. �� .l ,. y 4 r Tit L%AIT OF s t �.. f f / £ARYHwplt7tl flISP9S1►h-1�5R�A` :r >x •� •`•j �1��+-•+ -'��{ ..• :af � .t� ` r� ■xfi��.:• j '• ! j 'i �' + J"�,' firs � ��»r .� .-` L� i •.��`� .��'a+ fr{ .!}�l 4 �� � ! � •! i gg � fi � u srePew, Public Remd Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110607 Page 18 of 18 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:29 PM PST I e FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: city of Federal Way MAIL TO: cLty of Federal way 33530 let Way South Fed@Yax W4y, WA 98003 Go ATTK3 Jeff Pratt OFOR RSNTATJI/RITTB CORNERPROJECTB For and consideration of ope Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Robert L. Wright, an individual, (ftGranto7r") grants, conveys and warrants to the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington Municipal Corporation ("Grantee") for the purposes hereinafter set forth a perpetual exclusive easement under, across and over certain real property (the, *'Property") located in Federal Way, Washington, legally described as follows: [see Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein w by this reference.] ..a } Except as may be otherwise set forth herein, Grantee's rights shall be exercised only upon that portion of the Property ("Easement Area") legally described as follows: [See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.] 1, purpose. Grantee and its agents, designees and/or assigns mhall have the exclusive perpetual right, without prior notice to Grantor, at such times as deemed necessary by Grantee, to enter upon the Easement to inspect, construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, grade, excavate and enlarge all surface water drainage facilities including, but not limited to, underground facilitiem and/or systems Upon and under the Easement Area, together with all necessary or convenient appurtenances thereto, including without limitation, pipes, catch basins, retention and detention facilities, ponds, biofiltration swales, ditches, water quality treatment facilities vaults and semi --buried or ground mounted facilities ("Facilities"). Grantee shall have the right to flood the Eascrnent Area and to engage in any and all activities as if Grantee a-ne fee title to the Easement Area. Following the initial construction of the Facilitiea, Grantee may I- -1- EXCISE TAX NOT R£CUIREO Mrr Ifs. elan Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110608 Page 1 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:38 PM PST 0 M from time to time construct such additional facilities or Improvements as it may require within the Easement Area. 2. Attu. Grantee shall have the right of rearonabl a access to the Easement Area over and aoress the, property to enable Grantee to QXelrcise i.tg rights hereunder. . otsw rt tion _ Pik ++ping Grzintee may ramvvei any and all vegetation. treag, or other obstructions within the Easement Area, and may level and grade the Easement Area. 4. P • s trs This Eaaement shall be exclusive to Grantee; provided, however, Grantor reserves the right to use the Ea-,7ement Area in order to comply with city coda :requiremcntea for open space, greenbeltt> or maximum 10t caverELge; and provided further Grantor may install-, at its expen9e, such facilities as reasonably necessary to provide far direct discharge of troated atarm Water, from the property to the Easement Area in compliance with all applicable lawn and after obtaining all necessary permits; and Grantor may install landscaping in the Pelrmanont Easement if the City approves such installation and after obtaining all �j neco�asary permits and approvals in compliance with all applicable C laws. Grantor shall not perform digging, tunnalling or W other form or construction activity On the Property, which would disturb the compaction or unearth the Facilities on the Easem.ant Area, or endanger the latar+a.l support to the Facilitlas. Grantor c:hall not blast within fifteen (15) feat of the Easement Area. :l7 5. ceSso s e_ The rights and obligations of the O� restleG shall Inure o andassigns benefit the and be binding upon their pective successors, hairs. G. Np Eng_ Mj2X'l}scrtM- Grantor shall maintain the Easement Area free of s11 encumbrances and defects and is probibited Carom recording or taking any action which results in the recording of any lien, encumpbrance or other d fect against the Easement Area. DATED this O day of a 1995. GRANTOR: GRANTEE: WRIGHT cTTY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington Municipal Corporation By By Ro er L. t Kenneth E. Nybe ��� Its City Manager Iota Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110608 Page 2 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:38 PM PST I I r � ? r STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. [xNDIVxD11" NOVARVIj COUNTY OF KING ) On f-his day pernanally appeared before me, the undo, caignad Notary Public in and for the State Of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, Robert t,. Wrlcjht, to ms known to be the individual described in and who executed the foraga.ing irmsrrument, and on oath swore that he executed the foregoing instrument as hie free and r voluntary act and dead for thei uses and purpoeas thorei mr�ntioned. '+ V hand and official --seal this t day of ! 19J5. l�{ ary s not zs) f (�F (typed/printed na=e of notary) Notary public in and for the State of f Washington lMycarnmission expires: lit # � K_�tlOCIMCMY � 9/tlY/45 O -3- Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110608 Page 3 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:38 PM PST i w • STATE OF WASKINGTON ; as- [INDiVIDVAL VOTARY3 COUNTY OF KING ) on this day personally appeared before me, duly aotpmissianed the undersigned Notary public in and for the Statte of Washington, and sworn, Robe'r't L. Wright. to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foragoing instrument, and on oath swore that he executed the foregoing instrument as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVF.N my hand and official seal this day of e 1995. notary s glTa ure) f•typad/printed name of notary) Not:a>ry Public in and for the State of Washington My commission expires - STATE OF WASHINGTON10 �t COUNTY OF KING ) on this day personally appeared before me, the uhderm1gned Notary public in and for the State of waehi.ngton, duly commissioned 'O and sworn, Kenneth E. Nyberg, to me known to be the city Manager of ai the city a£ ]Federal Wuy, a Washirtgtan municipal corporation, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the usem and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument. GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of ? , 1995. sJi/t ' r�rG� R��f�/ 29' otary a nature �V F- —(typed/ prin ed name or notary? "s "�•y"' Notary Public in and for the state ,', j°U9L1G of Washington. ?.7Y� My commission expires: K:\ppClpiENT\HRIGHT.EAS 910Fl95 , -3- Pui)lic Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110608 Page 4 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:38 PM PST 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" TO PERMANENT EASEMENT - WIUGXIT That portion of the south half of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, and that portion of the north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying westerly of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99) and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 20; thence south 01 ° 12' 17" west along the east line of said northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1479.34 feet to the northeast corner of said south half of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence north 88'24'53" west along the north line of said south half of the north half of to the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 169.96 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. I (US 99) ••1 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNi1,IG; o thence contlnue along said north line north 88°45'53" west, a distance of 1143.58 feet to :n the northwest corner of said south half of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence south Ol' 14'32" west along the west line of said southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 328.83 feet to the southwest corner of said north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence south 88°46'07" east along the south line of said north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1034.43 feet to said westerly right-of-way line of Primary State highway No. 1 (US 99); thence north 22°49'31" east along said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 115.81 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the Ieft having a radius of 2815.00 feet through a central angle of 04°21'52" an arc distance of 214.43 feet; thence north 71°32'21" west. a distance of 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left having a radius of 2905.00 feet through a central angle of 0020124" an arc distance of 16.65 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. k: ad=u—ahwr4h1.lp1 Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110608 Page 5 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:38 PM PST 0 L_!�� E, XHEBIT 'B" TO PERMANENT EASEMENT - W IGkIT The west 528 feet of the following described property: "chat portion of the south half of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, and that portion of the north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying westerly of Primary State highway No. 1 (US 99) and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast comer of said Section 20; thence south 01912' 17" west along the east line of said northeast quarter of Section 20, a CD distance of 1479.34 feet to the northeast corner of said south half of the north half of the CD north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence north 88'24'53" west along the north line of sald south half of the north half of 4 the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 169.96 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 (US 99) and tho TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along said north line north 88 045.53" west, a distance of 1143.59 feet to the northwest comer of said south half of the north half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence south 01°14132" west along the west line of said southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 328.83 feet to the southwest comer of said north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence south 88046'07" east along the south line of said north half of the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, a distance of 1034A3 feet to said westerly right-oF-way line of Prirnary State Highway Nc. 1 (US 99); thence north 22"49'31" east along said westerly right -of —ay line, a distance of 115.81 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left having a radius of 2815.00 feet through a central angle of 04*21'52" an arc distance of 214.43 feet; thence north 71 °32121" west, a distance of 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left having a rudius of 2805.00 feet through a central angle of 0°20'24" an arc distance of 16.65 feet to the TRUE POINT OF JBMINNING. k 2 W=U n W td%W d X1..{.t01 Public Rccurd d Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:1995 9509110608 Page 6 of 6 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:38 PM PST SE1/4, NE1/4, SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 N., RANGE 4E., W.M. IE SE7011 CW T KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 7-:14-W'AC91.1. 1 WC V4 4 H Q:w II RT.! S SMN SL E rNif z ACE s �rxi a>S� rfNt• � A9s'�sle'rr s. 267,15 t r IRTI ruc w a'E� g Vi ! II I G'�M �]9IK111r1 R:'S C I PC .%A. 1 bi S nx>Igm tfni • l my TKC . cAsr tP-Lye w' 1I BASE OF BEAIarG T A55316 FAM. ff j t I1F1I.. 12 'Ely A.4C lR if FAST AE Cr SuDW 1.1 I WHIP Y: ACCH. p 1 4 Fw. 4:A51. SCALE 1'=109 I f I 1 t i=ACaCO' M605.0' 1 1 I L•-lM 1.16.09' I Ir fIY1c5L^'R{CI'D; �--riLl 1 in q �X mr.rrvff ELarEn- 1•a1AN• �� I< - r ppp r AH7� rAY G}t4 All YIL rm N8S (B=CMD! ¢r' 1 99�FRD I) D rj i I 7YE t :ar: i4'% 1 n� f:S1A: Cl j* ' Ee0d4' eE ff1 a-' I I , Lu V� i I � +�Xtl•ta!Iccer: 4- •rr. y I AI= = 2rb0.2) a 8 T xA�I I I 11rcT 9(71 CLtil1 ,:� li G • � �YITJ.S $J7 D; Ir:f 31 •� � tP-�Ik1 � I I S rr s.. qq I 7 H7[IP'iT. C[i I IDLY =GF ]11. 10 MM M I- CASE may.• r�-�'-�-•-------- ,C3IF+A -� 2rH LS' tiara: aI �"iX4 3L'Ai ---- "-• L_ �xaf �E --- :I J Zia 16.8s.33m M. FiYC t<� Brs�tl>1c11 I 1FAT RT. Q(Q DE Sl.11blf 71•L]77R •11r7'K M^f71IAIF S ill.7XQPEtr 31NT� 7'•[ {).Y y+�,vl 4H 10- • •70M 111aM IT TX -PIA ►Q W'WG l G it7 KP H K1. 7L m NiF tr9f fYiY I -IN A71 q�}q1 AAr OF -f FAT#Lf q,!:@Vi tF •; ax wi *C>�C-II C 2L SM 24 liVjLr: W't, LLiv, 1 CAsi w„ KAIIPs ar 1 IG'i17( 9tC4Qiv1C•, lrll9 H:siYu1' a F1gaAtr YFi H3Y,FY HA' his a?) WIF Av_ s 115-", 1601F. �$J A ti� ZONAL NOTES 4NW..0 AT WE i"T*T WIPE? C- MD EEM 2a no1C_ SC.,N CI'li:i• M'TS M: )!- H2 IF 7)]rfl7FAs-D:AAP', ff YCP%I 7G A UUlA1CC ff I, PtXANr CPPP;. �A. 5 AN1 AC4ySPl L2"'M P051)Ts Y,TE M2. YFw M MLX'm ,Cc NA3;-10-:--E 1110"1015iPMf7R-Ku- 0',Ir Nmii HYf AF m X:?R' NA2F ff--F.. }1g1�t 51L'T4 (C i; 3J;dY-tliLtiS L9Yi 7j:i f{; 1Y1C Fd.IVYi Y]/I�YIII FCS IQl1; hAr 4L'FE AD-PRC-Y"xpw. U3.6[>'s 3ltr6T 101%) u Im T¢•g IEcVE9Q. i{M°CO idW, 41riS 01ty r.A¢rZ1wTwM6=7r F:'11w. vn!FILET15P" IIC EG, Flli-bfC 10"51,�1(Rf!Ll(ICr,L144.Td3711 FTa.F Fr) FISf1.M IFS 9171Ff 11.SL' fC CFM N1011DL=!'tKIYfE:1511 1TE5' 4JF:>6 G SIC'01 7R {!r?OFnFO Idt.�F1C l)11E'ItSrilf i1lC d-RFr QI; :f ri4�S P[ S:R.E'.� `cl if',tlt' S9-lY tl3 FH:IARr s'FE Ilq'/M, A7. I p V. *0 :- lu RIFT ? SQN'il:: 2 1ML J-,aPDT PAD LA MIS PA-00 UqN AW_-( RAJ MA! "PC CMAkY C-. Y:5 N:.A, +izd tvitr moo :.vmuC^3;Pw! ELF PGTFkFX..•"13 Mr)P li{gi0.K.S r--Lw-OlwrPllr CFtLAAA.1f>f, L4�FLL7FF":y e1Eb AI 800 xA'. F92 r<•-OA]I YATim ifRXT3•Pr.17l: Rt'i "+. Y_).'•IVi dA$Li6: •1L F}I CLi-=M1ir QlNL lr'r O�IAA`.%=E MX FF-le*'Art W47t I,T, • E,T � PM V SMA •3. -#11k Alq Q1Y gr51 YOk 7E SE51 tY£'7 Y1P Y,TN'4s4 R.1ACS G TI' 7A"7 S SL'I PN 19 FA0", :{DX ATAE 7 91P.KY XF."RIM N WIN119 Of E.F.i£F AT?AAS 36 AFF "I'll IM m1:4 Or.U''-XF7 NES *11 lr/ii. 4 S&AI TIM Pile'aY 0, 7i)Il mr S W17Yam C- M,,MTt s131Aeq.1 1211 FFV Y K IN Vq Qi1:g P -L'FH-•[P•S MM Cr 1"1:6; 'RGL MM a}*WWk710n%ill 3r4X Vk LM IWF I}N: ss)IA fff 71111:'- 1C!Ii: 1O'�CHOFi•SF ll 9F7L[tA,1163f KAFA fiR0 Y!AlIAS9G grae'Ab1 F)FI 7FIFLS 0.q QJkPV cr X Fl114[9t 1volm if MEN 20. A MAP,--(f ISL4 Mi 10 '9LW 41 RSR FSEFM'7.Qypl n AYJ; Ff 7 9:i+d3+i Fkw R A13 16F OC68i 7�rE iFE•A{*D"9IC I.4-Wx Cr M=jr-'mw IL I(As raj "rM'Dr&t1:r wmr.&."m Nmmo: Flom v TY7416'3wZia M-TWO L''mNMIFLx[wr Ms 4" 71 RE iQ) a:N ria mfolir 11IILMIM EAST xxW KFEPLI MI-Or-TAY LM, A(MM2' OF 115.61 7T.--; FE i vmw M1-A bWET I u; VAiL vuAII{1r-iiIJS Una911TZ. n:%i KCA1+TG FL•QA17 r V.O:,g e:il7'F71 fIAY lllk'E Ask ALI :F,VE To H L7T HS•Mt A 9MLS CF 285,11 FdCf '1101 l A 11.14 ANLF Or co., M P'Sl ZI }E 11Q SIX. I EaiCM OF M-e- PSC A' ARC Y3 IM: FA 211A: TM-1 P13kY M:P.p ?;::71' F.S[ A DUTL:It r '979lFC r Y QSN\HC iI A ME T: Tit U-1 IL9C� ff 5171=Y - Dn'.. X. PAGE 75 1H710E A-.lIF ktl :R1[ 71 xE I]TiXAr i:JOl,c af:5pk1G FAT 7'jl i f QBAAL AR}f L.: p• I31Yf0 h' SNIY - B:T • I✓< P;LS S. A^F 3L.A 2d2C 7}. Pl>C r5rM12 Cc W MTV LIE 31 E WET Of FEI7NIre FiMRO OF rZkY - EICr 4 POE sP711E X Ik" CQHr' 7 tHE, ri'E :f b?klil'. mWi of r,'r njirr• XAS-N:QN. Public Record I. 7 N PLDIF %1A C.4 v�� � Ls M '9Cll 1 6 1f_1_u71r1'e•H'es,rlt�'111{Fern ` a Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2005 20050815900003 Page 1 of 1 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:51 PM PST Return. Address: Lakehav en Utility District Development Services P. O. Box 4249 Federal Way, WA 98063-4249 COVERSHEET 20070718001802.001 .8001802 Document Title: Agreement (Progressive Insurance Claims Center) Reference Number(s): Grantor(s): Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Grantec(s): Lal-ehaven Utility District Legal Description: Pta S '/z of N %Z of N %2 of SE'/4 of NE'/a of Section 20 and Ptn �fN t/2 of S 1/2 Additional legal description is on "Exhibit A" of document. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number: 202104-9051 Acc mint iV,ltltlbLl'. i; rAt��y�1rrilT: . 2..27.;3.�]a0 000Odtj19.. d:- �1T :SU' Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2007 20070718001802 Page 1 of 9 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:57 PM PST 20070718001802.002 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CLAIMS CENTER Agreement No. 6106019 ACRE MEN THIS AGREEMENT, entered into in duplicate between the LAKEIIAVEN UTILITY DISTRIC"I', ..King County, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "District" and PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE CONWANY, hereinafter referred to as "Developer". WITNESSETH; WHEREAS, the ]District operates and maintains a water distribution system within its boundaries which can serve property of Developer, and WHEREAS, Developer desires to construct certain water mains and appurtenances at itg own cost to serve Developer's property, for delivery to and operation by the District, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED that: 1. The land for which domestic water service is requested and to which this Agreement applies, is realty in Icing County, Washington, legally described. in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. By exeGating this Agreement, Developer represents and warrants that it is the owner of record of the above -described property, If such mpresentation of ownership is invalid, this Agreement shall be void. Developer agrees that the District may require Developer to furnish a title report for the property at Developer's expense. 2. All legal deseiitptions shall be famished by the Developer and shall be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. Each description shall be accompanied by a drawing that graphically depicts the legal description, 3. The Developer has paid the required deposit as set forth in Resolution No. 2005- 1056, or any subsequent amendment thereto. Said deposit shall be held against actual expenses, including all bacteriological testing acid sampling. The District shall determine, on a regular basis, Page i rblm Record I Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2007 20070718001802 Page 2 of 9 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:57 PM PST 20070718001802.003 its actual casts associated with the project and shall submit to Developer, if and at such time as its expenses exceed the deposit heroin, an invoice to repay the District for actual costs in excess of the amount previously collected, payment shall be due upon receipt of said invoice. in the event that the deposit exceeds the District's actual expenses, the District shall issue to the Developer, at project closing, a refund of such unused amounts. 4. In the event this Agreement is not executed and returned, along with the above - referenced charges, within six (6) months from the date of transmittal of same to the Develope;, which date of transmittal is July 5, 2006 the Agr %tent shall be void and a new Developer Extension Application, along with application fee, will be required. 5. In the event work and construction described herein is not coirunenoed within six (6) months front the date plans and specifications have been approved, this Agreement shall be void and of no force or effect whatsoever. In the event that work has commenced within the tine period specified herein, construction shall be completed on or before Left 31, 2007. Ifconistruetion is not completed by such date, this Agreement shall be void and of no force or effect whatsoever. 6. It is agreed by the parties that time is of the essence in all matters relating to the performance of this Agreement. 7. The District's engiucers shall review final plans and specifications for water main construction to be performed by the Developer under this Agreement. If preliminary plans are not deemed acceptable by the District, Developer shall be obligated to revise the plans and specifications in accordance with design standards deemed acceptable by the District. After Developer has been notified in writing by the District that final plans and specifications have been approved, Developer and Developer's contractor shall meet with District representatives for a preconstmetion conference before construction is commenced. The Developer shall submit rnylar originals and duplicate reproducible mylar originals prior to scheduling the preconstruction conference. S. Developer agrees that it shall be responsible for providing to the District accurate and reliable information concerning the actual location of the facilities constructed. In furtherance of this obligation, Developer shall procure from its design engineer, TRMD ASS09i6,TM, or such other licensed engineer or surveyor that will be consulting on the construction phase of the project, a written statement, which shall be submitted to the District prior to scheduling the preconstruction conference, stating that accurate data will be collected during construction of the facilities to enable the engineer/surveyor to submit actual and reliable "as -built" locations to the District, based upon the information available to the engineer/surveyor during construction and also by field survey of the constructed facilities that are accessible at the ground surface. Developer shall cause such engineWsurveyor to submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstmetion conference, a certificate of insurance for the o4neces/surveyor's Errors and Omissions policy. Developer shall also cause such engineer/surveyor to submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction conference, a certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the engineer's/surveyor's Page 2 Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2007 20070718001802 Page 3 of 9 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:57 PM PST 20070718001802.004 General Liability policy, naming the District as an additional insured as respects the obligations set forth in this section. The limits for Errors and Omissions and General Liability bmuranc:e shall not be less than $1,000,000.00 for each claim; $1,000,000.00 aggregatc. At the conclusion of construction and prior to and as a condition of acceptance, the enginccr/surveyor shall deliver to the District its certification that it has made periodic field investigations and measurements during construction and that the "as -built" drawings submitted to the District, which drawings shall be provided on diskette in AutoCAD format and on original or fixed -line photo mylar, are accurate and reliable. The District shall have the rigtat to approve any change in the consulting engineer or surveyor during the project and Developer agrees that the District may refuse any change in the consulting engineer or surveyor or may condition the same on resubmittal of the certification of location described above. No approval of any new engineer or surveyor shall be unreasonably withheld by the District. 9. In addition to all amounts payable by the Developer, asset forth herein, the Developer shall pay, prior to scheduling the preconstruction conference, the sum of $2,150.72 as and for a charge in lieu of assessment fox water facilities previously constructed which provide direct benefit to Developer's property, or a portion of'Doveloper's property, and for which District funds were used to Rind or partially fund the construction, pursuant to and in accordance with District Resolution No. 2005-1056, Section 3.B. 10. The District will make application for the City of Federal Way 'Right-of-way Construction Permit', Developer uoknow(edges f'atmzliarity with the provisions of such Rigbt-of_ way Construction Permit and agrees that it or its contractu?s failure to comply with any of the provisions of the permit shall entitle the District, in addition to the right to enforce any other remedy available to the City of Federal Wray as the permitting party, to immediately stop -all construction activity on the right: -of -way until the violation or violations have been eliminated and corrected to the satisfaction of the District and the District should not be held liable for any damages, either direct or indirect, for the delay and expense of such -work stoppage. Developer shall procure all other state, county and city licenses or permits. 11. In the event an easement is required over realty other than realty described in Paragraph No. 1 herein, such easement, in form acceptable to the District, together with We report or othor sitffioiexut proof of ownership of such realty, shall be delivered to the District prior to scheduling the preconstruction conference. Developer shall be obligated to obtain a written release from any property owner across whose property constructionn is performed pursuant to the grant of an easement, sufficient to indicate that the site restoration on the easement is satisfactory and complete. 12. Prior to scheduling the preconstruction conference, Developer shall deliver to the District a restorations performance bond in a sum to be determined by the District after receipt of any required Right -of -Way Construction Fennits and/or after the determination of off -site restoration requirements related to the work described herein, conditioned. that Developer will restore to the satisfaction of the District, and state, county, and city agencies as applicable, all work Page 3 Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2007 20070718001802 Page 4 of 9 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:57 PM PST 20070718001802.006 to be performed hereunder in public rights -of -way and District easements. Form and contents of bond shall be determined by the District. 13. Construction shalt be perfornied in accordance witli District approved plans and specifications and only under the supervision of workers or craftsmen experienced in the installation of water mains acid the related work.. 14. Two (2) sets of shop (working) drawings shall be submitted to the District as one pac1mge, bound and indexed with a table of contents, for all equipment/material to be furnished for Oi.s project. Each submitted piece of equipment1materiai sha11 be fully defined by catalog number - and reference made as to its applicable section of the District's Standards. Shop (working) drawing's shall be submitted prior to or at the preaonstnrction conference. 15. By execution of this Agreement, tho District does not guamtes water service will be provided to realty described herein. In the event that any District facilities, such as storage tanks, wells, and water transmission mains, become utilimd beyond their design or approved capacity or become inoperable for any cause, the .District reserves the riot to refuse any connections which would use such facility until remedial action has been completed, and the District shall .not be liable for any direct or consequential damages which occur to Developer arising out of sucb District refusal to connect or time delay rxecessary to take r-arnedial action. 16. The Developer and its agents agree to indemnify and hold the District harmless from any and all claims which may be assessed against the District as a result of tiro construction or maintenance of the work described in this Agreement prior to acceptance by the District. The Developer shall maintain in frill force and effect during the construction period, the following insurance: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance with bodily .injury and property damage limits of not less than: $1,000,000.00 Each Occurrence $2,000,000.00 General Aggregate $2,000,000.00 Products -Completed Operations Aggregate Limit b. Business Auto Liability coverage for all owned, non -owned, and hired autos with bodily injury and property damage limits of not less than: $1,000,000,00 Each Accident A certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the )Developer's Commercial General Liability Insurance policy, showing the District as additional insured as respects the work to be perfomed under this Agreement, shall be provided prior to scheduling the preconstruction Page 4 Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2007 20070718001802 Page 5 of 9 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:57 PM PST 20070718001802.006 conference. Thirty (30) days written notice shall be given to the District for cancellation or expiration of this insurance. 17, Developer shall notify the District the date. work and construction described in this Agreement will commence, and said notice shall be given not less than 72 hours (trot including Saturday, Sunday, or national holidays) prior to such date. No water facility shall be covered prior to inspection. After work is commenced, it shall vigorously, consistently, and in a first-class woAxnanlike manner be carried to completion, Developer shall maintain at the construction area at all times during construction, a representative to whom District notices may be given regarding construction. Said representative shall be designated in writing by the Dcvcioper before start of work. Developer may request inspections durng construction upon two (2) clays notice to the District, 18. Testing of water facilities shall be performed as required by the District and only after satisfactory tests have been completed and witnessed by the District's designated agent, will the work be accepted. Developer agrees that at such time as the District has performed inspection of the water connections and has delivered itemized punch lists to Developer and/or Developer's -contractor, that the project will be pursued to final completion, including the performance of all necessary site restoration. 19. Upon completion of construction, Developer or contractor shall deliver to the District a bond in the amount of ten percent (105/9) of construction costs or $5,000.00, whichever is greater, that a reliable contractor will make and pay for repairs necessary within two (2) years from the date of acceptance of said construction, arising from. faulty labor or material. Form of bond is to be approved by attorney for the District. Developer shall also deliver a Bill of Sale for water trains and appurtenances installed and constructed pitrsuant to this Agreement, together with pernmrhent easements for their location in a form acceptable to the District. 20. Upon cvunpletion of construction, Developex shall submit, for acceptance and approval of the District, a statement of monies and/or other accounting of monies expended to perform construction described herein, together with such other engineering records and data as may be required by the District. 21. in the event Developer requests and the District provides water meters for the realty described herein, prior to District's acceptance of work, Developer, agrees to be solely responsible for any loss or damage to such water meters or their installation, which occurs prior to said acceptance of work by the District. 22. Work and construction performed under this Agreement shall not be connected to the District's water system until all provisions and requirements of this Agreement and District Resolutions, on the part of the Developer, have been fief ly complied with. Page 5 Public Record [ Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2007 20070718001802 Page 6 of 9 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:57 PM PST 20070718001802.007 23, The District and Developer agree that in carrying out the terms of this contract, the Developer shall be acting as an independent contractor and in no respect shall Developer be deemed an agent or partner of iakehaven Utility District. 24. Developer shall not assign this contract without the written consent ofthe District. 25. The District shall provide water service following the District's acceptance of the water distribution system for operation and maintenance and upon payment of the connection charges as set forth and in accordance with District Resolution No. 2005-1.056. Said connection charges shall consist of the Capital Facilities Charge (CPC), lviiater installation Charge and any other such charges levied in accordance with said District Resolution No. 2005-1056 or amendments thereto or any other applicable District Resolution at time service is requested. 26. Partial waiver or waiver by acquiescence by the District of any provision or condition of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other provision or condition of this Agreement. 27. This Agreement shall constitute an easement and servitude upon the property described herein and shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors in interest to the Developer. This Agzncment shall constitute an equitable lien against property described herein and in the event of nonperformance by Developer, as stated herein, the District may foreclose said lien in the manner authorized by law. 28. This writing constitutes the full and only agreement between the parties, them being no promises, agreemonts or understandings, written or oral, except as herein set forth, or as hereinafter maybe amended in writing. 29. Upon execution of this Agreement, the parties agree in the event either of them is required to enforce any provision or provisions of this Agreement against the other, tl)at the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to all other amounts to which it is otherwise entitled by this Agreement, to its actual attorneys fees and costa, including those incurred on appeal. Page 6 Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2007 20070718001802 Page 7 of 9 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:57 PM PST WITNESS our hands and seals, PROC3RMIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY LAKEIIA King cim By Its__gf tCe�(P�,�de•� Date: 'Loa STATE OF 0 r `tO 89. Connty of U IITIi;MY DISTRICT Manager Dated." 3 rr 20070718001802.008 I certify that 1 Iwow or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument, on oath stated that was authorized to execute the instrument and, acimowbAged it as the tilt . a 5L— of PRC CRESSIVE GASi1AI i SC RTM.NCE COMPANY , to be the free and voluntary aot of stlah party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: 5 I,\ '2'�q r[ 117 rLr J 1. rL L For recording in the State of waswrlston, the Notarial Seal must be fully legible and cannot Intrude into document margins. Please affix Beal in the apace provided. My appointmetlt expires Public Record Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2007 20070718001802 Page 8 of 9 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:57 PM PST 20070718001602.009 EXHIBIT "'A" Pidelity National Title Comgany of Washington PA11CA colwitment, page 2 Order No 0173379 That gottion of the South halt of the North halt of the North half of the Southeast quarter ❑t the N=Lheast gunner of Section 20, and thnt Portion of the uarth •half of tht3 Soutn half of the north half of the Souh.aot quartar of the Northeast quarter of SaCtLon 20, Townubip 21 North, Range tl East N M , reeorda of King CO=Y, Washington, lying Westerly of prifnary $tact! Highway Nq. t -RUA; 99) and morn particularly deaerited an EoiloWa, commoncing of the Nortbepet corner of said Sectim 20; l'H£NCS South 131912,17^ Nest along the Ease live of aagd Noz'themet quartar of section 20. a dlatance of 1479.3& feet to the Northeast corner of said South half of ttie Tlarth half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the trorthrcac quarter oe Secti=j 209 T'HENc6 Hortb 9a"3d53n viast along•the North line of aai:d South heat of the North 3AalF of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the 14ort.heant gutin ar of Secttca 20, a diatanCe of 169.96 test ~o the Weatcrly rjgbt-orway li" of Primary 8gate Highway No- 1 [ug 9s) and the true point of beginning) TFiM09 contixlue. along said North llna Morth B80451530 West, a distance of 1143.58 f+det to the Ncrthw(�Lfft Corner of said South half of the North half a! the North Ralf of the Southeast quarter of the Naxhheast quarter of seoticu 201 TAENCB South 01*1413211 F4CBt along the Wjgtt lzne of paid Southeast quarter of the !northeast quarter of gt=-tion 20, a &BtaiAcr•ot' 328.63 Beet to the Southwest cosnHx of aria ptorth haLf of the South half of this Worth halt of the soutbeapt quarter of the -Northeast quarter of Section 201 THROCE south 98"461(1V East along the South line of said Worth hall* of the South half of the So-rth half of the Southeast quarter Of the Nort'heaet aluarter of Secltion 20, a dlla"ntiG of 1034.43 £net td 9$10 Westerly right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No. 1 MS 9911 THENC2 North 22110131• sent along Snits We9t4irly right —Of -way line, a diatanC+e of M- 91 feet to the beginniM of a curve tM the ISM THENC8 alMq said curve to the 109t having a radina Of 9815. 0- fern; throwzb a aautral angla of 04,21,52" an axe diat4awe of 314.49 feet! TiMUM North 71032'2I" hest, a distarce of 10 00.feat to the beginsinT OP a Curve to the left; THENCE Clang nnid curve to th6 left haV3fng a z'adius of 2605.00 feet A:hrougl: a 4L•AtF741 eagle 01 0120'24w an are distance of 1645 feat to this true point ce hegrinning. situate in the County of King, State of Washtntikon. Public RCCOMf! Order: 611048037 Doc: KC:2007 20070718001802 Page 9 of 9 Created By: darcyg Printed: 1/10/2013 2:49:57 PM PST ae14r rr � s-s ar O120 90R A 7 • ,a ; M ¢➢e NAY BL 90-0001 ' i ti r41)a3 n 9004 � j 4 � • I so:A. 11.% 4 '� „ Q .ri x mtln rc x_. ouo r]lA ^ ev.ex.l)36t] crl '�F' L1R� 91 m1• .: II Q�Z 1r• 1 r. L 15 ?1" o I: M e •LOT2 _ Y / 8 9051 r _ 7a 9119 ,r 0 KCBP BT6031•a � p• � rt-:M'n •r,.•vsr a lenx9rett Ill). x r .rM1y a ��s�•�r • 4vRWtT l::aal .]y 1 .:� LOT 9041 r x ' KCBPi 0020 7 1B 9 ]41M rr INn, uF 9100 P, a,la A9 aPIF 12 i� 12 r fi 9053 - K06P7 W7 of 781315GA! H .afl TPCL 1 ... KL-2 ML 3 PCL4 N^ Q w9137 14 9161 , 916Bs 0 91256 r 'yi'69°" sr 9067 tv R KCBP 77705e AF 7012110854 ae Y v PCL4 PCL1"PCL2 PCL.3 .E PCL4 �, { ! )m yi•1r + 1a10 tir � ? rC4 !•n Mr:,r R� 9111) r 9172) - IIBNBBI ' t 906E !), 7 IN r �. Ir 1 •.r. - .I r 9121 �•iH ]esicl 1p) Iva I v ` •} 9048 A 9093 K o [ a rr.+r•--- -•-•-• MLA- +rLaxr.r-r 1TI. 9i >< R R lies j 11 ¢6�v 00R0) a 0037 • bO• 5 ` 6 Anna u sszur o .. 9109 is ' 0035 00. i m" 1 Sar41 Ir -• �� B -� ••� I