11-102110iL a
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www. cityoffederalway, com
RE: FILE #11-102110-00-AD; VILLAGE GREEN INUMORY CARE DisCUSSION FROm2011
Dear Mr. Powell:
The following is a recollection of my participation in the Village Green memory care discussion.
ere e a an
a modification to the approved site plan that had been approved by the Hearing Examiner under Process
TV. I was asked to review the original SEPA documents and see if they were adequate to address the
proposed changes, and I was to contact Monte at home once the files were transferred from storage.
Following file retrieval and review, I met with Monte Powell and his architect Joji Minatogawa on July 1,
2011, regarding the addition of memory care (congregate care) units to that portion of the Village Green
Retirement Campus known as Cottages West. The proposal was clared as a two story with partial
basement building, approximately 29,000 SF in size, containing single and double occupancy units of
memory care with support services. A total of 51 beds were listed on the "Village Green Memory Care
squarefeet analysis " dated March 23, 2011. This number may increase up to 60 beds depending on final
design. The memory care building would replace four to five of the duplex units approved under the
Cottages West site plan on the south side of the property in the vicinity of duplex units #28/
29/30/31/31/33/34/35 and 36. It was again noted that due to financing needs, the memory care building
needs to be on its own parcel without adding any new parcels to the Village Green Campus.
ISM,
111111 opollpill
1 1 i
Green Campus, and that the approved Cottages West site plan could be modified via an administrative
process to eliminate duplex units and replace them with memory care units/beds, consistent with the
codes in effect at the time of application. I
I also noted that in reviewing the Village Green files, I found that 24 memory care beds had been
proposed and approved as a part of the 1998 Phase 1. However, a subsequent modcation to the approved
Phase I site vlan changed these units from memonj care units to duplex units. I suUested that it would be
appropriate to ask about "credit" for these units in subsequent preapplication conference process.
Monte Powell
March 28, 2012
Page 2
I said that the zoning land use chart for senior housing in the RS zoning district had not undergone any
Chan es since the ori --itt IFA t"
--------------
I encouraged contact with the Public Works Traffic division to ascertain if there would be additional
traffic mitigation for memory care.111
7g.T=- LIM �,N&TpnVfAp
-fok-
00
rg U si I gy! I Rio) I mud uggywalej I IR r*190-SIVAOT21NAVIT i , .' .
Sincerely,
Deb Barker
Senior Planner
enc: Preapplication Handout
Master Land Use Application
c: Heidi P. Swartz, 5724 30'h Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98105
Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager
Ell Following the meeting, in a letter dated July 26, 2011, Senior Transportation Engineer Sarady Long confirmed that traffic
impact fees would be required for any memory care units, and those fees paid to the city prior to building permit issuance - file
I I - 10211 0-00-AD.
11-102110 Doc. I D, 60715
Village Green KUennmpy Care
Square Feet Analysis
March 23, 2011
Gross Bldg s.f.`
Basement 5,560.0
Main Floor , 11,660.0
Second Floor 11,660.0
Total Gross 8|dgm.f. 28,880.0 28,080.0 s.f,
Net Areas '
Congregate Residence Floor Area
Main Floor _
Congregate Unit l
3,602{]
Congregate Unit
I/458.0
Second Floor
'
Congregate Unit 3
3,682.0 _
Congregate Unit 4 .
2,687.0
Circulation area: Uving/Stair/Bev.
Basement
297.0
Main Roo,
3,534.0
Second Floor
],534J)
Total Circulation area
7,365.0 7,365.0
Comnmunk«/Suppurt/Res.Kk/Dinin8
Basement
5,352J0
Main Floor
1,078.0
Second Floor
1,776.0
Total Community
,
9,00.0 9,00.0
Total Net Areas 28,880.0 y�
Number ofDouble Occupancy Rooms 21 x 2 43
Number of Single Occupancy Rooms 9 9
51 Beds
Total Beds
0TY OF
Federal
Mr. Monte Powell
29607 8Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Mailing Address: PO Box 97
Federal Way, WA 98063-971 Z
(253) 835-7000
www.cityoffederalway.com
FILE
Following our meeting on July 19, 2011, 1 spoke with the City's Public Works Traffic Division about the potential
of adding a memory care wing to the Village Green site. Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Sarady Long
looked into the matter, and has provided the following comments:
"Village Green Phase III (Cottages West) was approved in 2000 under the old pro-rata share mitigation
system, which required traffic mitigation only if trips generated by the proposed development impacts
transportation improvement project by 10 or more trips. Since the project's trips did not impact any TIP
[�rojects by 10 or more PM peak hour trips, there was no traffic mitigation for this project. Furthermore, a
5-year extension was approved in 2008 for the remaining Phase II and III of the Village Green project
without any traffic mitigation paid.
with a 28,880 SF Congregate building (Assisted Living/Nursing Home) consisted of approximately 51
beds. This proposal will generate approximately 11 PM peak hour trips. As such, a concurrency review
application with an application fee of $1,584.50 will be required. Additionally, the applicant will be
required to pay traffic impact fee currently estimated at $27,656 prior to building permit issuance.
IN iiiiiiiiiliiii� 111111111111111
Estimated Trip Generation:
51 beds Nursing Home (Assisted Living) @ 0.22 trips per bed
= 0.22 x 51 beds
= 11 PM Peak Hour Trips
Traffic Impact Fee (2011 Fee Schedule) =51 beds x $542.28 per bed
= $27,656
Also, I have considered traffic impact fee credit for an existing use or previously paid impact fee. HowevM
this does not apply as Phase III (Cottages West) did not pay any traffic mitigation and the five Cottages
West units have not been built
Hopeftilly this information is useful to you and your design team. Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Long at 253-
835-2743, or �araclv . I can be reached at 253-835-2642. We look for -ward to working
with you on the memory care project.
Sincerely,
/Ovtlg�f6L�,�-
Deb Barker
Senior Planner
Doc LD 58414
Deb Barker
From:
Sarady Long
Sent:
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 9:50 AM
To:
Deb Barker
Cc:
Rick Perez; Ken Miller; Kevin Peterson
Subject:
Village Green Phase III Question
Hi Deb,
Thank you for providing the back up information on the proposed project. It helps me a lot in explaining this
project to Rick, Ken and Cary.
Phase III (Cottages West) was approved in 2000 under the old pro-rata share mitigation system, which
required traffic mitigation only if trips generated by the proposed development impacts transportation
improvement project by 10 or more trips. Since the project's trips did not impact any TIP projects by 10 or
more PM peak hour trips, there was no traffic mitigation for this project. Furthermore, a 5-year extension w
approved in 2008 for the remaining Phase 11 and III of the Village Green project without any traffic mitigation
paid. I
I - 'it, AAart!mt #",ges West with
a 28,880 SF Congregate building (Assisted Living/Nursing Home) consisted of approximately 51 beds. This
proposal will generate approximately 11 PM peak hour trips. As such, a concurrency review application with
an application fee of $1,584.50 will be required. Additionally, the applicant will be required to pay traffic
impact fee currently estimated at $27,656 prior to building permit issuance.
. . . . . . . ......
r f
Estimated Trip Generation:
51 beds Nursing Home (Assisted Living) @ it trips per bed
= 0.22 x 51 beds
WFULTA r • M
Traffic Impact Fee (2011 Fee Schedule) = 51 beds X $542.28 per Bed
= $27,656
Also, I have considered traffic impact fee credit for an existing use or previously paid impact fee. However,
this does not apply as Phase III (Cottages West) did not pay any traffic mitigation and the five Cottages West
units have not been built yet.
Senior Trans. Planning Engineer
253-835-2743 (p)
253-835-2709 (f)
sarady-long@cityoffederalway,gorn
CITY OF
Fiaderal A10y
FROM: Deb Barker 1�0
MEMORANDUM
inquily: What is the "tippingpoint"for theproposed memory carefacility to have to pay additional tra ic
determination —
Cottages West: Approved for 40 senior housing units, and 86,660 square feet. At this point, 14 of the units are
constructed and occupied.
Village Green Phase lapproved for memory care.
The first phase of Village Green included 16 duplex units at 4,400 square feet each. A modification to the
9,9& rooms
in a 4,900 square foot building, for a total of 24 beds within 9,800 square foot of building area. These special
needs units were not constructed and insteadtwo duplex units at 4,400 SF were built. This creates a modesi
9csurplus" • • floor area and special needs beds.
Current memory care proposal:
Proposed is one 28,880 SF building with congregate care (special needs, memory care • Altzheimer'�
patients� circulation and support areas in a two story with basement building. This creates 21 double
occupancy rooms and • single occupancy rooms for a :• • 51 beds. The memory care building would
10 units).
Traffic Mitigation
Tire 14
collected • the following:
* 1995 Phase I MDNS: Pro-rata share contribution of $19,100 for the South356h Street project
* 1997 Phase 11 MDNS: Pro-rata share per dwelling unit $82,500/228 units- $361.84 per unit.
* 2000 Phase III (Cottages West) DNS No traffic mitigation
I - I • I I , • 1 1 -•• 3 1 =.
(1) If any building permits for the Village Green Phase 11 and Phase III (Cottages West) project have
not been issued within the City code -based five-year timeline granted under Process IV Approval, the
applicant shall fund preparation •. a new • analysis. This analysis must demonstrate that
adequate capacity for the un-built portions of the project still exists for the remainder ofthe project. In
the event that there is not adequate capacity, the applicant shall be required to construct whatever
mitigation measures are necessary to meet the adopted Level of Service (LOS) at any failing
intersection.
(2) If any building permits for the Village Green Phase 11 and Phase III (Cottages West) project
have not been issued within the City codebased five-year timeline granted under Process IV
Approval, the applicant shall make payment of applicable transportation • fees that
are in effect at the subsequent building permit issuance associated with any extension.
Urom: SAEID DANIA%
To: stephenc,rong,fays,skipt
Date: Tuesday, May 16,1995 848 am
Subject: village green of federal way
S.356th st. project.
the pro-rata share for mitigation of this project is $ 19,100.-
this is calculated based on the percent pro-rata share of .91 % as identified in the revised TIA.
thanks
saeid
GREEN LLC
2DOKS POWELL
: 98.309
DIES, WA 931"
."522®
BON COMPANY, INC.
M. DUNG ANSON , P.E.
T, MOGG PLS
MSAUM BLVIO SW, 301
WA 95166
4-4141
GREEN U-C
95309
NES, WA 96196
24-5274
Y LINE ADJUSTMENT
INC COUNTY
!ND AVE 74
C (393,809,47t S.F)
OP BLA (FILE #00-104014-000-00-SU)
I
HOUSING COMMUNITY
ION OF VILLAGE GREENS)
NITS/GROSS ACRES
MEN UTILITY D15TRICT
VEN UTILITY DISTRICT
L 'NAY
L WAY
SOUND ENERGY
T
SOUND ENERGY
TIONS
- 1 HOUR
R
IAS APPROXIMATED FROM
49 WILL BE PREPARED
PLAN SET.
FIELD SURVEY By
I
I OR 2 UNITS 25 CAR GAP,
gry
13
EE: =14,
SECT 30, TWP
VILLAGE GREEN
COTTAGES WEST
UNIT MATRIX
BUILL'INIG TYPE
UNIT
PLAN
1ST FLOOR
2ND FLOOR
GARAGE
TOTAL
GROSS AREA
A 2
B
PLAN 3
1542 S,F.
470 S.F.
312 S.F.
2012 S.F.
4648 S.F.
CLAN 3
1542 &F.
470 S,F,
312 S,F,
2012 S.F,
X
3
PLAN
1542 SY
470 S.F.
31: S.F
2012 S15.
4!545 S.F.
4
PLAN 3
1542 S, F:
-70 S.F.
312 S.F,
2012 S.F.
2
5
PLAN
1542 S.F.
470 S.F.
312 S.F.
2012 S.F.
4E48 S.F.
5
PLAN 3
1542 S.F.
47D 5,F,..
312 BY,
701.1 S,F,
2
7
=LAN 3
1542 S.F,
470 S.F.
312 S,F.
2012 5, F,
46413 S,F.
0
PLAN 3
1542 S.F,
+110 3.r
312 5. K
2012 SIF.
S
PLAN 3
1542 S.F.
470 S.F.
312 S.F.
2012 S.F.
2324 S.F.
r 1
10
PLAN 2
1532 S.F.
312 S.F.
1532 S.F,
6396 S.F.
11
PLAN 1
1272 5.r-
375 $F,
1552 S.F,
12
PLAN 2
1552 S.F.
312 S.F.
1552 SR
13
PLAN 1
1272 a F
175 S.F.
1552 S.F.
0 1
14
PLAN 2
1552 S,F.
312 S.F.
1552 S.F.
8396 S.F.
15
PLAN
1272 S.F.
375 S.F
1552 SY.
16
PLAN 2
1552 S.F.
312 S.F.
1552 S.F.
17
PLAN 1
1272 S.F°
575 S,F,
1552 S.F.
H 6
18
PLAN 2
1552 5.F.
312 S.F.
1552 S.F.
8395 S.F..
19
PLAN 1
1272 SY
375 S.F.
1552 S.F.
20
PLAN 2
1552 S.F.
ms 12 S.F.
1552 SF.
21
PLAN 1
1272 S°F.
375 S.F
1552 S.F.
1 1
22
PLAN 2
1552 5,F,
312 BY.
1552,S.F.
6396 S.P.
23
PLAN 1
1272 S.F.
375 5, F.
1552 S.F
24
PLAN 2
1552 S.F.
312 S.F.
1552 S.F.
25
PLAN 1
1272 S.F
375 S.F.
1552 S.F.
A 2
22
-LAN 3
1542 S.F.
470 S.F.
312 S.F.
1552 S.F.
2324 S.F.
K 2
27
PLAN 3
1542 S.F.
470 S.F.
312 S.F.
2012 S.F.
4548 S.F,
28
PLAN 3
1542 S.F,
470 S.Fq
3i2 SZ
7.012 S.F.
L 1
29
PLAN 2
1552 S.F.
312 S.F,
1864 S.F.
4.195 S.F.
30
PLAN 1
1272 S.?.
375 S.F,
1547 S,F.
31
PLAN 2
1552 S. FL
312 S.F.
1804 S,F
095 S.F.
32
PLAN 1
1272 S,F.,
375 SF,
1647 S.F.
1
.33
PLAN 2
1552 S.F.
JIZ SF,
1552 S.F.
8396 SF:
34.
PLAN I
1272 S.F.
375 S°F.
1552 S.F.
35
PLAN 2
1552 S.F.
312 S.F.
1552 S.F.
36
PLAN 1
1272 S.F.
375 S. F.
1552 S.F.
1
37
PLAN 2
1552 SX.
312 S.F.
1552 S.F.
8395 S.F.
319
PLAN 1
1272 S.F.
375 S.F.
1552 S,F.
32
PLAN 2
1552 S.F.
312 S.F.
1552 S.F.
40
PLAN 1
1272 5,F.
375 S.F.
1552 S.F.
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS: 40
^^ ALL EUILDING TO BE LESS THAN 30' HEIGHT.
-F I OR 2 UNITS
Cl--I3 \_prdRCN/B&CX
TYPE 1 BUILDING
2 OR 4 UNITS
SCALE: 1" = 20'
16,
PORCH FORC
-------- --- L
T
49 5' 7T
I OR 2 UNITS 26' CAR CAR 26, 1 OR z UNITS
12' 12�
RCK/'.)m )L
TYPE 2 BUILDING
2 OR 4 UNITS
SCALE: 1" = 20'
55.5-
IV
Cnco