16-104973SaradyLang
From: Sarady Long
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 2:03 PM
To: 'Matt Gray'
Cc: Permit Center
Subject: RE: Gravity Coffee -35U07Enchanted Parkway: Permit Status
Attachments: CRC Notification Le1tecpdf
Hi Matt,
The Public Works Traffic Division has completed the concurrency test for the subject project (3lZsquare foot Drive-Thru
Coffee shop). Based on the submitted information, the project "PASSED" the concurrency test.
A Capacity Reserve Certificate (CRC) and a traffic concunencytest summary for the project are attached. The CRC
certificate allows your project to proceed with other applicable permit processes.
if you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Sarady Long
Public Works Department
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
Eli lail:
From:
Sent: Monday, OctuUer24, lUIb 8:31*r
To: Permit Center
Cc: SnnadyLong
Just so I am clear on this end. Is there anything else you need from the design team, Owner? Paperwork, fees
to be paid, etc... ? I believe all forms have been compiled and submitted, as well as, payments.
Wolfe Architectural Group
Attn: Matt Gray
Spokane, WA 99201
A
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www.cityoffederalway.com
Jim Ferrel(, Mayor
The Public Works Traffic Division has completed the concurrency test for the subject project,
consisting of 312 square foot Drive-Thru Coffee shop. Based on the submitted information, the
project 'TASSED" the concurrency test.
The CRC is valid until the development permit expires, is withdrawn or canceled whichever occur
first. The CRC cannot be sold or transferred to property not included in the legal description
provided by the applicant in the application for a CRC.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me
at (253) 835-2743 or sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com.
Sarady Long
Senior Transportation
SL:su
Enclosures: Traffic Concurrency Test Summary
Capacity Reserve Certificate
cc: vfeject File
Day File
1:\dept\pw\tra\concurrency\2016 cn projects\ I 6104973_grav ity coffeftravity coffee cn determination letter.doc
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
cury of 33325 SIh Avenue South
I � Federal Way WA 98003-6325
4
Federal Way 253-835-2700; Fax 253-835-2709
CAPA ciTy REsER vE CER TmcA TE (CR
This CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION is made this 25 1h day of !agar 2016 by the City of Federal Way
(COFW), a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter called the "City").
WHEREAS, the developer intends to develop the property described as GraEk Coffee reviewed under City
file CN Number(s) _16-104973-CN (hereinafter called the "development"); and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A requires that the City adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development
approval if the development causes the level of service on a transportation facility to decline below the standards
adopted in the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of
the development are made concurrent with the development; and
WHEREAS, the City adopted its comprehensive plan in November 1995; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 19 of the COFW Revised Code was amended by the creation of Chapter 19.9f
Division III on June 10, 2006 by Ordinance 06-525 effective January 1, 2007; and
111111111111111 11111 1 InIpI 11 !111111 � - a a - 6
based on the facts and conditions set forth herein.
Development Parameters
-111LU
Development type:
Drive-Thru Coffee Stand
Development size:
312 SF Building Area
Property address:
35007 Enchanted Pkwy S
Federal Way, WA 98003
Parcel No. (s):
185295-0020
Number of New PM
Peak Hour Vehicles Trips Generated: 5
92=
This CAPACITY RESERVE CERTIFICATE is valid only for the specific development approval
pzr2mg-�c za Wg�ml
If the development is changed, expired, cancelled or withdrawn, it will be subjected to reevaluation
for concurrency purposes.
Terms of the Capacity Reserve Certificate
This CAPACITY RESERVE CERTIFICATE is valid until the underlying development permit
expires, is withdrawn or cancelled, whichever occurs first.
1 4-4
Date: Z-5 0CP
Approved By:
-74
Printed Name: &JIchard A Q
.P.ere Title:
Public or Department
CITY OF 33325 8th Avenue youth
2 5341e"d 98003-6325
315 �2 7WZZAft. 5 3 - 8 3 5 - 2 6 0 9
Federal Way %Yww ciiyoffedeTahvay corn
APPLICATION (NO(S)- 16-104973-00-CN Date. October 20. 2016
Project Name Gravity Coffee
Property Address/Location 35007 Enchanted Pkwy S
Parcel Number(s) 1852950020
Project Description Enmclosed 312 SF Drive-Thru Coffee Service
Based on the traffic distribution, intersections impacted by at least one or more evening peak hour trips were analyzed for ineeting concurrency LOS standards
(vIc less than 1.2 for signalized and 1.0 for UDsignalized) consistent with the City of Federal WayTransportatiou Coneurrcnoy Management code as described
in FWRC 19.90.
Table I below shows a summary of the LOS analysis for the study intersections with V/C ratio above 0.60 at the anticipated build -out year. Where a
performance measure does not apply to the entire intersection, the table shows the measure for the worst movement of the intersection. For all other study
intersections and detailed LOS calculation, please contact the Public Works Traffic Division_
-aal al �ai u�1dii—immix—,,�ic"
Table 1: Concurrency Level of Service (LOS)
Intersection 2016 Background LOS 2{116 With Project LOS
Conditions Standard Conditions t Standard
ID
Zone North -South Street
East-West Street
V/C
met"
V/C k
Met?
16 Av S '�SR 18
+
095
Y
5 ,9
I —
V
-------
----------- — ----------
1 Enchanted Pk%vV S
tS 352 St
0,67
Y
"
067
Y
5050
--------------
5151
F__ ------- - -
:1-7richanted i;kwy S
------- ----------
;S 356 St
0.79
Y
0.79 1
-------
Y
All intersections Tact the City of ederal Way LOS standards: Yes C70MI
Concturrency Test Result Passed,, Fail.
if "Fail", identify intersections and possible mitigation:
<'oncurrcncv Test performed by: Saradv Lane Dale CLI:L%K
L:\DEPTIP\AATRA\Concurrency\2016 CN Projects116104973 Gravity CoffeesConrurrency LOS Sumtnary_GC 111
1
x,
,v
-CL
a
kA
dr.
271h Avenue South
C7
Y
5nuth
a ^a
P�
ti1`�
t
w
m
s
`It South
�
®
Vol,
2bCC r' e
�
L
^
r
25th Peace SO-`
ylnna5,34152
4MOS aseld 41®Z
43noS
tti*S 1d P,£Z
23rd Face 5outh
, h A410I
. tit F
4U'nS a-Icld "PuZ2
and "Puce 5outn.
YznOS a3 fld 15l Z
22r6 y .'`..
r
hm Ce ab
IV
i
In
a'
P
i4
�lthF*ba�cer
a
am
d
w
0
L
v
df m
LL
',
7
my
t�
�v
4
s
t3
{8d,
v
4
gih Place ydtgsl,
"
,m
s
z_
a
a
�
$'.:LZ3
x
L
a
n
°pry
z
i
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4850: Enchanted Pk=,S/1
6 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18
10/21/2016
--*
--0-'i
4-
*--
f,
4\
t
/".
'*
Movement
EBU
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
N8U
NBL
NBT
NB9
SBL
Lane Configurations
A
ttt
if
)))
ftt
r
A)
"fit`r
M
Traffic Volume (vph)
4
109
1194
333
986
1543
459
162
303
595
530
521
Future Volume (vph)
4
109
1194
333
986
1543
459
162
303
595
530
521
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
Grade (%)
2%
-4%
2%
Total Lost time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
0.91
1.00
0.94
0.91
1.00
0.97
0.91
0.91
0.97
Frpb, ped/bikes
1.00
1.00
0.98
1.00
1.00
0.97
1.00
0.99
0.99
1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Frt
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
0.96
0.85
1.00
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
Satd. Flow (prot)
1738
5034
1517
5077
5173
1558
3385
3205
1407
3467
Fit Permitted
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
Satd, Flow (perm)
1738
5034
1517
5077
5173
1558
3385
3205
1407
3467
Peak -hour factor, PHF
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Adj. Flow (vph)
4
109
1194
333
986
1543
459
162
303
595
530
521
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
0
0
93
0
0
211
0
0
18
46
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0
113
1194
240
986
1543
248
0
465
763
298
521
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Bus Blocka2es 1#thri
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
Turn Type
Prot
Prot
NA
Perm
Prot
NA
Perm
Prot
Prot
NA
pm+ov
Prot
Protected Phases
7
7
4
3
8
5
5
2
3
1
Permitted Phases
4
8
2
Actuated Green, G (s)
12.3
39.8
39.8
30.0
57.5
57.5
22.9
37.0
67.0
23.7
Effective Green, g (s)
12.3
39.8
39.8
30.0
57.5
57.5
22.9
37.0
67.0
23.7
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.08
0.27
0.27
0.20
0.38
0.38
0.15
0.25
0.45
0.16
Clearance Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Vehicle Extensions
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
142
1335
402
1015
1982
597
516
790
675
547
v/s Ratio Prot
0.07
c0.24
C0.19
0.30
0.14
c0.24
0.09
c0.1 5
v/s Ratio Perm
0.16
0.16
0,12
v/c Ratio
0.80
0.89
0.60
0.97
0.78
0.42
0.90
0.97
0.44
0.95
Uniform Delay, dl
67.6
53.1
48.1
59.6
40.7
33.9
62.4
55.9
28.6
62.6
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.86
0.96
0.73
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
24.2
9.5
6.4
21.4
3.1
2.1
17.4
22.5
0.2
26.7
Delay (s)
91.8
62.6
54.5
81.0
43.7
36.1
71.1
76.1
21.1
89.3
Level of Service
F
E
D
F
D
D
E
E
C
F
Approach Delay (s)
63.0
54.9
62.8
Approach LOS
E
D
E
Intersection Surrima!y
HCM 2000 Control Delay
60.4
HCM 2000 Level of Service
E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity
ratio
0.95
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
150.0
Sum of lost time (s)
20.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
104.1%
ICU Level of Service
G
Analysis Period (min)
15
Description:
c Critical Lane Group
Gravity Coffee 16-104973-CN PW - SL
2016 Background Page 1
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4850: Enchanted PkwX S/1 6 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 10/21/2016
Traffic Volume (vph)
777
150
Future Volume (vph)
777
150
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
Grade (%)
-2%
Total Lost time (s)
5.5
Lane Util. Factor
0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes
1.00
FIpb, ped/bikes
1.00
Frt
0.98
FIt Protected
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)
4980
Fit Permitted
1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)
4980
Peak -hour factor, PHF
1.00
1.00
Adj. Flow (vph)
777
150
RTOR Reduction (vph)
19
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
908
0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
10
Bus Blockages
Turn Type
NA
Protected Phases
6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
37.3
Effective Green, g (s)
37.3
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.25
Clearance Time (s)
5.5
Vehicle Extensions
2.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
1238
v/s Ratio Prot
0.18
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
0.73
Uniform Delay, dl
51,8
Progression Factor
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
2.0
Delay (s)
53.8
Level of Service
D
Approach Delay (s)
66.5
Approach LOS
E
Intersection Summa!y
Gravity Coffee 16-104973-CN PW-SL
2016 Background Page 2
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
S & S 52 St
10/21/2016
Turn Type
DP+P
NA
Perm
D.P+P
NA
pm+ov
D.P+P
NA
D.P+P
NA
Perm
HCM 2000 Control Delay
28.0
HCM 2000 Level of Service
C
HCM200UVolume toCapacity ratio
0.67
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
158.0
Sum uflost time (s)
22.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization
774%
ICU
Level
o|Service
U
Analysis Period (min)
15
Description:
u Critical Lane Group
Gravity Coffee 1&404A73-CN PN SL
2016Bonkgmund Page
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5251: Enchanted Pkwy
S & S 356 St
10/21/2016
Movement
EBL
EST
EBR
W8L
WBT
WBR
NsL
NBT
NBJR
S81.
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
4
tt
Traffic Volume (vph)
227
10
278
30
72
6
426
1058
53
9
1244
6
Future Volume (vph)
227
10
278
30
72
6
426
1058
53
9
1244
6
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
Grade (%)
1%
0%
_1%
1%
Total Lost time (s)
3.5
3.5
2.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
3.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.97
0.95
1.00
0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes
1.00
0.98
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
FIpb, ped/bikes
0.99
1.00
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Frt
1.00
0.85
1.00
0.99
1.00
0.99
1.00
1.00
FIt Protected
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)
1745
1524
1742
1837
3450
3508
1761
3504
Fit Permitted
0.61
1.00
0.37
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
Satd. Flow erm
1123
1524
671
1837
3450
3508
1761
3504
Peak -hour factor, PHF
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
uo
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Ad}. Flow (vph)
227
10
278
30
72
6
426
1058
53
9
1244
6
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
0
216
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0
237
62
30
76
0
426
1110
0
9
1250
0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Bus Blockages L �Ibr)
2
0
2
2
0
2
0
2
0
0
2
0
Turn Type _
Perm
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Prot
NA
Prot
NA
Protected Phases
4
8
5
2
1
6
Permitted Phases
4
4
8
Actuated Green, G (s)
32.7
32.7
33.2
33.2
22.0
100.8
2.0
80.8
Effective Green, g (s)
33.7
33.7
35.2
35.2
24.0
101.8
2.0
82.8
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.16
0.68
0.01
0.55
Clearance Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.0
4.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Vehicle Extension
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
252
342
157
431
552
2380
23
1934
v1s Ratio Prot
0.04
c0.1 2
032
0.01
c0.36
v/s Ratio Perm
c0.21
0.04
0.04
v/c Ratio
0.94
0.18
0.19
0.18
0.77
0.47
0.39
0.65
Uniform Delay, dl
571
47.0
46.0
45.8
60.4
11.3
73.4
23.4
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
40.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
6.0
0.7
4.0
1.7
Delays)
97.4
47.1
46.2
45.9
66.4
12.0
77.4
25.1
Level of Service
F
D
D
D
E
B
E
C
Approach Delay (s)
70.3
46.0
27.1
25.5
Approach LOS
E
D
C
C
Intersection SUMM2,1
HCM 2000 Control Delay
33.6
HCM 2000
Level of Service
C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity
ratio
0.79
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
150.0
Sum of lost time (s)
18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
78.9%
ICU Level of Service
D
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Gravity Coffee 16-104973-CN PW - SL
2016 Background Page 4
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
4850: Enchantedfkwx
S/1 6 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18
10/21/2016
t
--*
--P.
-'r
f-
+--
,-
it
t
/".
\$-
Movement
tBIQ
EBL
EBT
EBR,
WBL,
WBT
WBR
NBU
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
Lane Configurations
+tt
if
)))
ttt
r
M
+14.
?
Traffic Volume (vph)
4
109
1195
333
987
1543
459
163
303
595
530
521
Future Volume (vph)
4
109
1195
333
987
1543
459
163
303
595
530
521
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
Grade (%)
2%®
4%
2%®
Total Lost time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
0.91
1.00
0.94
0.91
1.00
0.97
0.91
0.91
0.97
Frpb, ped/bikes
1.00
1.00
0.98
1.00
1.00
0.97
1.00
0.99
0.99
1.00
FIpb, ped/bikes
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Frt
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
0.96
0,85
1.00
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
Satd. Flow (prot)
1738
5034
1517
5077
5173
1558
3385
3205
1407
3467
Fit Permitted
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
Satd. Flow
1558
3385
3205
1407
3467
Peak -hour , factor, PHF
1,00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Adj. Flow (vph)
4
109
1195
333
987
1543
459
163
303
595
530
521
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
0
0
93
0
0
211
0
0
18
46
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0
113
1195
240
987
1543
248
0
466
763
298
521
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Bus Blo
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
Turn Type
Prot
Prot
NA
Perm
Prot
NA
Perm
Prot
Prot
NA
pm+ov
Prot
Protected Phases
7
7
4
3
8
5
5
2
3
1
Permitted Phases
4
8
2
Actuated Green, G (s)
12.3
39.8
39.8
30.0
57.5
57.5
22.9
37.0
67.0
23.7
Effective Green, g (s)
12.3
39.8
39.8
30.0
57.5
57.5
22.9
37.0
67.0
23.7
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.08
0.27
0.27
0.20
0.38
0.38
0.15
0.25
0.45
0.16
Clearance Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2,0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
142
1335
402
1015
1982
597
516
790
675
547
v/s Ratio Prot
0.07
c0.24
C0.19
0.30
0.14
c0.24
0.09
c0.15
v/s Ratio Perm
0.16
0.16
0.12
v/c Ratio
0.80
0.90
0.60
0.97
0.78
0.42
0.90
0.97
0.44
0.95
Uniform Delay, dl
67.6
53.1
48.1
59.6
40.7
33.9
62.5
55.9
28.6
62.6
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.86
0.96
0.74
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
24.2
9.6
6.4
21.6
3.1
2.1
17.6
22.5
0.2
26.7
Delay (s)
91.8
62.7
54.5
81.2
43.7
36.1
71.5
76.2
21.2
89.3
Level of Service
F
E
D
F
D
D
E
E
C
F
Approach Delay (s)
63.0
54.9
62.9
Approach LOS
E
D
E
Inter sectiera Surhm2a
HCM 2000 Control Delay
60.5
HCM 2000 Level of Service
E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio
0.95
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
150.0
Sum of lost
time (s)
20.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
104.1%
ICU Level of Service
G
Analysis Period (min)
15
Description:
c Critical Lane Group
Gravity Coffee 16-104973-CN PW-SL
2016 Horizon Page 1
4850: Enchanted Pkwx S/1 6 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 10/21/2016
movement
SST
SBR
LaWonfigurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
777
150
Future Volume (vph)
777
150
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
Grade (%)
-2%
Total Lost time (s)
5.5
Lane Util. Factor
0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes
1.00
FIpb, ped/bikes
1.00
Frt
0.98
Fit Protected
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)
4980
FIt Permitted
1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)
4980
Peak -hour factor, PHF
1.00
1.00
Adj. Flow (vph)
777
150
RTOR Reduction (vph)
19
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
908
0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
10
Bus Blockpes ffTr)
2
2
Turn Type
NA
Protected Phases
6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
37.3
Effective Green, g (s)
37.3
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.25
Clearance Time (s)
5.5
Vehicle Extension s)
2.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
1238
v/s Ratio Prot
0.18
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
0.73
Uniform Delay, dl
51.8
Progression Factor
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
2.0
Delay (s)
53.8
Level of Service
D
Approach Delay (s)
66.5
Approach LOS
E
Intersection Summaj,
Gravity Coffee 16-104973-CN PW-SL
2016 Horizon Page 2
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5050: Enchanted Pk w
S & S 352 St
10/21/2016
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL,
WBT
WBR
NiBL
NBT
NBR
S L
SBT
Si3R
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
26
6
30
253
8
313
7
900 -'
218
205
1413
' 40
Future Volume (vph)
26
6
30
253
8
313
7
900
218
205
1413
40
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
-1900
1900
" 1900
1900
Grade (%)
1 %
-11 %
0%
1 %
Total Lost time (s)
5.5
5.5
5.5
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes
1.00
1.00
0.97
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
0.99
1.00
1.00
0.95
Flpb, ped/bikes
0.99
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Frt
1.00
1.00
-0.85
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
0.97
1.00
1.00
0.85
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)
1729
1853
1523
1833
1965
1636
1770
3390
1760
3507
- 1494
Fit Permitted
0.75
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
0.14
1.00
0.18
1.00
1.00
Satd. Flow(Berrn
1369
1853
1523
1454
1965
1636
255
3390
339
3507
1494
Peak -hour factor, PHF
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1,00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Adj. Flow (vph)
26
6
30
253
8
313
7
900
_ 218
205 "
1413
40
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
0
27
0
0
261
0
10
0
0
0
13
Lane Group Flow (vph) '
26
6
- 3
253
8
52
7
- 1108
0
' 205
1413
27
Confl. Peds. (/hr)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Bus Blocka es #/hr
2
0
2
2
0
2
0
2
0
0
2
0
Turn Type D.P+P
NA
Perm
D.P+P
NA
pm+ov
D.P+P
NA
D.P+P
NA
Perm
Protected Phases
4
4
3
3
1
5
2
1
6
Permitted Phases
3
4
4
3
6
2
6
Actuated Green, G (s) -
27.0
15.1
15.1
27.0
11.9
27.1
103.5
88.3
103.5
102.5
102.5
Effective Green, g (s)
25.0
14.1
14.1
25.0
10.9
25A
103.5
88.3
103.5
102.5
102.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.17
%0.09
0.09
0.17
0.07
0.17
0.69
0.59
0.69
0.68
0.68
Clearance Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
262
174
143
269
142
339
186
1995
377
2396
1020
v/s Ratio Prot
0.01
0.00
c0.07
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.33
c0.05
' c0.40
v/s Ratio Perm
0.01
0.00
c0.09
0.02
0.03
0.32
0.02
v/c Ratio
0.10
0.03
0.02
0.94
0.06
0.15
0.04
0.56
0.54
- 0.59
0.03
Uniform Delay, d1
52.9
61.8
61.7
59.8
64.8
53.4
10.0
18.9
11.8
12.6
7.7
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.67
0.84
-
1.99
1.42
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
0.1
0.0
0.0
38.6
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.0
0.4
0.6
0.0
Delay (s)
52.9
61.8
61.7
98.4
64.8
53.5
6.8
16.9
24.0
18.5
7.7
Level of Service
D
E
E
F
E
D
A
B
C
B
A
Approach Delay (s)
58.0
73.4
16.9
18.9
Approach LCS
E
E
B
B
intersection sUMMa
HCM 2000 Control Delay
28.1
HCM 2000 Level of Service
C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity
ratio
0.67
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
150.0
Sum of lost time (s)
225
Intersection Capacity Utilization'
77.4%
-ICU
Level
of Service
D
Analysis Period (min)
15
Description:
c Critical Lane Group
Gravity Coffee 16-104973-CN
PW - SL
2016 Horizon
Page 3
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Enchanted P
-I
`� �
��
�
�-
,
°�`
. �
Frpb.ped/bikem
. 1.00
_ 0.98
1.00
1I0
�
-1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 '
Flpbped/bikem
_
0.99
1.00
0.08
1.00
1.00
lUO
1.00
1.00
'
Frt
' 1.00
0.85
1.00
0.99 '''
'
�1.OU
~-�0.98
1.00
1.00
-
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
0.05
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.85
1.00
_-
SaW.Flow (pmt)
1745
1524
-1742
.1837
-3460
_ 3508
1781
3504'
Fit Permitted
&OU
1.00
0.33
1.00
0.05
1.00
0.95
1.00
Bun
Turn Type
Perm
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Prot
NA
Prot
NA
Protected Phases
4
8
5
2
1
.8
Permitted Phases
4
4
8
,
Actuated Green, G(s)
~28.8
_29.0
301
301
'
22.0
103.8
2.0
~-A
'
Effective Green, g(s)
30.0
30.0
321
32.1
24.0
104.9
2.0
85.9
Actuated g/CRatio
.
0.20
0.20
021
021 '''
'
0.10
070
0.01 -
0.57
~
Clearance Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.0
4.0
5�0
5�0
5�U
5.0
'
2
wtRatio
_ 1.05
0.18
0.23
.O]B -'
'
'0J7
0.45
0.39
0.62
Uniform Delay,d1
59.7
49.4
48.7
48.3
60.4
9.9
73.4
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
'
1.00
1.00
1.00
�213
-1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
74.7
01
03
01
0.0
0.8
4.0
1.5
Dnlay(s)
134.4
49.5
49.1
484
55.4
10.5
77.4
22.8
Level of ofDemico
F
O
D
D
E
B
E
C
Approach Delay(s)
88.8
40
26.0
232
Approach LOS
F
D
C
C
HCM 2000 Control Delay
35.1
HCM 2000 Level of Service
D
HCM20DOVolume toCapacity ratio
0.79
'
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
150.0
Sum oflost time (s)
18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
78.9%
ICU
Level ufService
.D
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
_
Gravity Co#noiO-1O4073-CN PW-OL
E
Drive-Tru Coffee Trip Generation Data Collected by Portland State University ITE for
Montana State University ITE
Data Collected by:
Scott lice -Senior in CE program @ PSU, PSU ITE Secretary
Nick Carey -Junior in CE program @ PSU, current PSU ITE Vice -President
Introduction:
The original request of MSU for this data collection effort was to get a full weeks
count for six drive-thru coffee stands in the Portland area. However, after 1 + contacts
were made with various establishments in the area it was apparent that the Portland -area
coffee shops did not like to give out their "numbers". All but one site would not allow
tube counters to be set up on their property (their reason was that "We're not allowed to
give out our numbers"). So with little time left to'finish the data collection it was decided
that the only option was to videotape the drive-thru stands during their operating hours by
mounting cameras on light poles near the stands.
Methodology:
Two camera units were borrowed from a local firm. These units consisted of a
mailbox, a camera, a hard drive, and a battery. The mailboxes were mounted across the
street from the coffee stands. They were mounted on street lights (public property) using
tie -downs. Then the battery, hard drive, and camera were mounted inside the mailbox.
The units were running during the operating hours of each coffee stand used. When the
day was over the cameras were collected and brought to the lab where the info was
downloaded and the batteries recharged. For each coffee stand counted the process was
repeated. The original intention was to tape 6 coffee stands for 2 days each. Due to
equipment malfunction a few stands were only counted once.
The counts to determine ADT's for the roads were reported from the City of
Portland and the City of Beaverton.
Locations:
1. -The ` u -this stand is located in SE Portland on SSE Division St. and SE 115r"
St. This site is almost in the suburb of Gresham (East of Portland). The coffee
-stand sits on a large empty dirt lot on the south side of Division. Division has
-two lanes of traffic in each direction (runs E- , a turning lane (suicide lane)
and parking on both sides. The coffee stand is accessible on both sides (two
windows to order from).
11
2. MWWSD���this coffee stand is located in NE Portland on Martin Luther
King Dr. near the intersection of MLK and Jessup St. The stand sits in the lot of
a self -serve car wash on the west side•
standlanes of traffic in each direction and no parking. It is important to note that this
has few daily drive-thru trips probably because it is located between two
3. Mocha Delight -this coffee stand is located in SW Portland on Barbur Blvd near
the intersection of Barbur and 30`' Barbur runs N-S and has two lanes in both
directions and a suicide lane. Parking is allowed south of the stand on Barbur
(see picture). The stand itself sits in the North corner of the lot of an empty
4'. v Mocha Express -this stand is located in SE Portland on Powell Blvd "(Hwy 26)
near the intersection of Powell and 39`". -Powell runs E-W and has two lanes of
traffic in both directions. The stand sits in the parking lot of a small strip mall
on the North side of Powell.
0
5. Java Station -this stand is located in NW Portland at the intersection of Cornell
and Saltzman Rd. Saltzman runs N-S. The stand sits in the parking lot of a strip
mall that includes an ACE Hardware and a Rite Aid. Cornell and Saltzman both
6. Coffee Rush -this stand is located in SE Beaverton (suburb west of Portland) on
Cedar Hills Rd near the intersection of Cedar Hills and Walker Rd. Cedar Hills
runs E-W and has two lanes in both directions. Walker runs N-S and contains
one lane of traffic in each direction. The stand sits in a side lot of PetCo near a
I - - I a ME
RM
The previous aerial figures were obtained from Ponmn&nam eom. To look them
up just go to the website and enter the intersections mentioned with each location. This
website is a valuable tool. It can give you the dimensions of the property the coffee
stands are located on, the actual address, even the crimes committed in the surrounding
area. The AutoCAD files are also included (email attachments) so that they can be
copied into whatever format needed.
Data Collected: (*Count means vehicles served per time period)
Location: Mitch's Dog House (MLK)
Weather: Cloudy 60'
----------------- ---------- ----- - Time Period
5:30-ham
6-7am
7-8am
8-9am
9-1 Oam
10-11am
11-12pm
12-1pm
1-2pm
Total=
4- C
Date: 5/13/2005
5:30am-
Time: 2pm
Count
5
4
10
8
a
A
Determination of ADT's:
Counts have been provided by the City of Portland (see ADT Determination
Counts attachment) to help determine ADT's for each location. The values provided are
counts that were conducted by the city close to each location used in this report.
These counts are do not provide the necessary hourly volumes to allow any relationship
to hourly volumes on roadways during the evaluation period and were deemed to be
relatively inappropriate for this data collection effort.
This report was written to provide the obtained data and any other information
that seemed relevant to the process
WMI
Lial I