The URL can be used to link to this page

10-103774CITY OF Federa I M William Appleton Public Works Department 33325 8h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98023 RE: FILE #10-103774-00-SU; BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL Enticknap BLA, 36817 12'h Avenue South, Federal Way M30, =1 The City of Federal Way has completed its administrative review of the 'Enticknap BLA'. The applicant proposes a lot line adjustment affecting the following King County tax parcel numbers 322104-9141 (Parcel A); 322104-9123 (Parcel 13); and 292104-9112 (Parcel Q. The adjustment will result in the elimination of Parcel 'C'.. The remaining two parcels will measure 300,3 19 square feet and 252,974 square feet. The Department of Community Development Services hereby approves the boundary line adjustment rw-L4aTMrrm* meira*-jz�utve IlO wr the following condition to be executed prior to recordation: Provide King County Public Health authorization in the appropriate signature title block. DECISIONAL CRITERIA City staff has determined the following boundary line adjustment meets criteria set forth in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 18. 10: f- The boundary line adjustment is a minor alteration in the location of lot boundaries on existing lots The boundary alteration will not increase the number of lots, nor diminish the size of open space or other protected environments. 2. The boundary alteration will not diminish the size of any lot so as to result in a lot of less squa footage than prescribed in RS 35.0 zones. I I The boundary alteration will not result in the reduction of setbacks or site coverage to less than prescribed in RS 35.0 zones. 4. All lots resulting from the boundary line alteration will be in conformance with the design standards of the city's subdivision title. Mi. XOP'le"t`on October 18, 2010 Page 2 REcORDATION Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code 18.10.060, all boundary line adjustments shall be recorded with the King County Division of Elections and Records. To finalize the boundary line adjustment process, 4W—O-.t I mylars to the Permit Center. The department will record the boundary line adjustment mylars; and route the conformed copy to the applicant. CLOSING This land use decision does not waive com fiance with future City of Federal Wa codes 11 1 d IUV M-I =Ns' Sincerely, Greg Fewins, Director c: Ruth Enticknap, 36817 12'h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer 10-103774 Doe ID 56039 Y LAND USE APPLICATION *A fi �T of o a rry D LoPrvx $ERvICLS 33325 8"' Avenue South f, 13 PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Way f 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 > Acityoffederal•way,corm a �� " 4y� Date 5W9Ah911Mn APPLICATION NOW Project a e City of Federal' a 1 ntic .oat► BLA Property A ress/Location 6817 12" Avenue South Federal Way WA ' 003 arcelmer(s) I.C. I lo's 3221(llm 11 3210-123 292I09112 Project Description Rending riparian 'roe ac uistion b Ci oederal Way re processing of B A PLEASE PRINT Ty e o Permit Required Applicant Annexation Binding Site Plan Name: City of Federal Way, Boundary Line Adjustment Attn.: " Willi Appleton Gomp Plan/Rezone Address: PO Box 9718 Land Surface Modification city/State: Federal way, WA Lot Line Elimination Zip: 98063-9718 Preapplication Conference Phone: l 253-835-2750 " Process I (Director=s Approval) Email: William. pleton�1. Ltyoffederalwa corn Process II (Site Plan Review) .. Process III; (Project Approval) Signature X: Process IV,(Hearing Examiner's Decision) = Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) :' Agent (if different than Applicant) Process VI SEPA w/Project Name: City of Federal Way SEPA Only Address: PO Box 9718 Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use City/State:' Federal Way, WA Short Subdivision Zip: - 98063-97 8 Subdivision Phonic: 253-835-2753 Variance: Commercial/Residential Email: 1ff.Wolt.cit ofederaltrva-yacotn Required Information Signature: X:�� RS35 Zoning Designation Owner SFMD Comprehensive Plan Designation Name: Address: Ruth Enticknap 36817 12a' Avenue South NA -(Land Only Value of Existing Improvements City/State: 'Federal Way, WA NA _ Value of Proposed Improvements Zip: Phone: 98003 253-838-7196 Internation Building Code (IBC): Email: NA A_ _ Occupancy Type Signature: X: NA Construction Type Bulletin #003 — August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application CITY OF F�:dera I V{ city offederal Way 333258 th Avenue South Uederal Way, WA 98063-9718 CITY HALL C3325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9714 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederaiway.com ke- Letter of Transmittal- City of Federal Way BLA No. 10-103774-00-SU (Enticknap) Elimination of Pr----,] Parcel 3 tip, 11 [0114 W No Ma Ito) I Existing parcel "C" is entirely located within a wetland which is mostly co�ere.f water and is considered unbuildable. This BLA had proposed to relocate parcel 'Cto proposed parcel "3" location on a buildable upland portion of the large parcel The property owner concurs with the planning review comment and requests that the BL application be modified to omit all references to proposed parcel "Y'. Accordingly; plea red -line the preliminary plans to reflect this change. I VMTGT- i� Sincerely, William Appleton, P.E. Surface Water Manager WA.jw cc: Project File RESUBMITTED SEP 2 4 2010 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT CITY OF FEDERAL WAY W 11 a Uk & Ap.1 i n &V.Sl a I L CAUS, DATE: September 7, 2010 TO: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM- Matthew Herrera COMMENTS: Please provide comments September 23, 2010 NEW, =*- - PWOJECTN4ME: ENTICKNAP BLA PROJECTADDRESS: 36817 12th Avenue South ZONING DISTRICT.- RS 35.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- Pending riparian property acquisition by City of Federal Way requires processing BLA LAND USE PERMITS: Boundary Line Adjustment PROJECT CONTACT: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY JEFFWOLF 33325 8' AVE S M4 TERMLS SUBMITTED: 1. MLU 2. Cover Letter 3. September 1 memo to Greg Fewins 4. BLA Review Checklist 5. Wetland Stream Report by Landau Associates 6. Title Report (2) 7. Lot Closures (2) 8. BLA Drawings (5) CITY OF F6deml W�y 1 ovpRTNUF nt • 1 1117-1111 City of Federal Way 33325 8 1h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Re: Letter of Transmittal- City of Federal Way Enticknap BLA 211 Tax Parcels No. I 4� :141 3221 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com The purpose of this letter is to transmit the attached Boundary Line adjustment application package to the Department of Community Development. This BLA is required to allow city acquisition of vacant riparian property from Mrs. Ruth Enticknap for conservation Nr•� Please review the attached draft BLA drawings and supporting documentation and let me [mow if you have any questions. Sincerely, u. William Appleton, P.E. Surface Water Manager Um cc: Project/Day File kAswm\prcjccts\drainage subcatcbments\(whOl-16) west hylebos\misc\property acquisitions\enticknap\bla\approvals\application package\cover letter-bla appl\(form) mla cover letter, doc 1-11 'Z--" A —It V— 'V'% N—' - R k, LIV 1--i, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Cff'f OF Nderal W�y interoffice MEMORANDUM (253) 835-2700 P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 TO: Greg Fewins Community Development Director FROM: Cary M. Roe, P.E., Director of Parks, Public Works, and Emergency Management 00"-- SUBJECT: City of Federal Way Enticknap BLA BIA qqqg!g� The Public Works Department requests that you waive City permit fees on the subject BLA application for the above referenced project since this project is city-fimded. The South King Fire rd Rescue Dis��review The of $44.50 will be paid via electronic tratisf6t F Additionally; the Public Works Department requests that you waive the requirement for a pre - application conference for the above referenced project. This justification for this request is that the A �on�• o this T�'ect t•ensure that V�q,9Wwriager has been comrnunicatin�I&,,,ii city requirements are integrated into the project. Please call me if you have any questions. am cc: W. Appleton, SWM Manager Jeff Wolf, SWM Project Engineer Project/Day File 0 6 U CITY OF FEDERAL WXY CDS K:\SWM[\Projects\Drainage SubcatchmentA(WHOI-16) West HyleboWisc\PropertyAcquisitions\Enticknap\BLA\ApprovalAApplication Package\Cover Letter-BLA Appl\20100902 Fee waiver-Pre-App Waiver Request Memo, doc (L 4\CJ\-V10P � �4:�IC-L 4. )416'10-� LANDAu RESOURCESTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AsSOCIATES TO: Jeff Wolf FROM:: Jes akne DATE: August 3, 2010 WETLAND STREAM INVESTIGATION AND DELINEATION ENTICKNAP AND BRIDGES PROPERTIES FEDERAL AY, WASHINGTON CDS Kt the request of the City of Federal Way (City), Landau Associates conducted wetland and stream delineation on two properties consisting of five adjacent parcels (study area) located in Federal Way, Washington (Figure 1). The Enticknap property consists of three parcels? parcel #3221049141, parcel #3221049123, and parcel #2921049112 (collectively called Enticknap property), owned by Ruth Enticknap, located east of 8t" Avenue South and west of 12"' Avenue South. The Bridges property consists of two parcels; parcel #2921049118 and parcel #2921049103 (collectively called Bridges property), owned by David Bridges, located east of 8"' Avenue South and west of 12"' Avenue South. Two additional adjacent parcels were investigated as part of the study area for stream and wetland continuity, and they include the Larson property which consists of parcel #3221049112 and the Gowers property which consists of parcel #2921049113. This technical memorandum presents the results of the wetland and stream delineations and is provided for use by the City to assess and document the condition REMMM= The subject properties are located within the Puyallup/White watershed (Water Resource Inventory Area 10), Hylebos Creek basin in Township 21, Range 4 E, Section 29 and 32, and east of 8"' Avenue South, north of 372"d Way. The study area for the wetland and stream investigation consists of the subject properties, plus the surrounding 200 ft which represents the maximum buffer width for critical areas under the City of Federal Way Revised Code (FC). The Enticknap property consists of 12.71 acres and the Bridges property consists of 17.22 acres in size. The Enticknap property primarily consists of forested land and contains one man-made pond and the North fork of West Hylebos Creek (Hylebos Creek) running through its northwestern section. The Bridges property primarily consists of herbaceous and scrub -shrub vegetation with a large forested area located immediately west of 12`h Avenue South and contains two man-made ponds with Hylebos Creek running through the property. The Larson property consists of mostly previously cleared areas with Hylebos Creek running through a forested wetland along its northeast comer, The Gowers property consists of a large emergent wetland with a minor tributary of JBflebos Creek through the central and southern portions. This section presents the methods used to delineate the wetlands and streams in the subject proper,iiie's. The extent of wetlands and streams off the subject properties was observed from within the subject properties' boundaries. Estimation of the extent of offsite wetlands',and streams was made from field observations and readily available public domain resources as described below. 0613�� V.andau Associates reviewed the following public domain- resources to determine existing siridv .2re7: • Aerial photographs from 1936 to 1997 (King County website 2009) • Topographic map (USGS 1993; see Attachment A) • National Wetlands Inventory maps (USFWS 1981 to present; see Attachment A) • Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey (NRCS 2006 website various dates; Attachment B) • County and National Hydric Soils Lists (USDA, NRCS 2010) • StreamNet Interactive Mapping, including the Pacific Northwest Mapper (StreamNet website a; various dates) • WDNR Forest Practices Application Review System, Water Type Map (WDNR website 2007) • Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Natural Heritage Program (WDNR website 2009) City of Federal Way critical areas maps (City of Federal Way 2005) City of Federal Way riparian corridor property acquisitions and preliminary stream layout map (City of Federal Way 2010) WSOT 1-5 SR1 8/SRI 61 interchange improvement plants (SOT 2009) King County Imap, Sensitive Areas Map set (King County website 2009). 8/3/10 YA238\057.030\Welland Enticknap-Bridgestm.doc N WTV• •� FIELD INVESTIGATION Landau Associates wetland ecologists Sacha Maxwell and Jessica Stone conducted the wetland and stream investigation on the Enticknap property on July 8, 2009; Landau Associates wetland ecologists Perry Welch, PS, and Jessica Stone conducted supplemental wetland and stream investigations on the Enticknap property on April 19, 2010 and wetland and stream investigations on the Bridges property on May 12, 2010. All site visits were conducted within the official growing season recognized by the Seattle District USACE (1994). The weather during the July 8, 2009 site reconnaissance was sunny and 70 degrees, partly cloudy and 55 degrees during the April 19, 2010 site visit, and 65 degrees and sunny during the May 12, 2010 site visit. Field investigation site photographs are found in Attachment E. The wetland investigation was conducted in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Enginee (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE 1987), the USACE Regional Guidance letter on t 1987 Manual (USACE 1994), the USACE Interini Regional Supplement to the Corps of Enginee Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (USACE 2008) and t Washington State Department of Ecology's (Ecology's) Washington State Wetlands Identification a7 Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997). The USACE and Ecology recommend a preliminary data gatheri and synthesis of available background information, followed by a field investigation. t The delineation was conducted using the routine methodology, which includes a three-paramel approach to determine the presence or absence of wetlands that requires evaluating vegetation, soil, and hydrology (Table 1). Following this method, an area is determined to be wetland if all of the following three criteria are met: ME= � nomemmimm-mr, Data on vegetation, soils, and hydrology was recorded on data sheets (Attachment Q as sampling plo"I (SPs) located in areas meeting the mandatory wetland criteria, and in nearby upland to determi corresponding wetland/upland boundaries. The wetland boundaries were delineated using number r flagging. The boundaries of wetlands extending outside of the study were estimated based on views fro :1) the study area and aerial photographs and/or other information from the background information review.0 8/3/10 YA238\057.030R\WeUand Enticknap-Bridges�_Wdcc LANDAU AssocIATES 3 --J MMMMI, WIMMIMITIr, The ordinary high watennark (OHWM) of streams within the study area was delineated based on the methodology provided by Ecology (Olson and Stockdale 2008), which focuses on examining existing hydrologic data and observation of field indicators including hydrology, soil and sediment, v . egetation, 9nd marks of scouring, etc. All data points were marked using labeled flagging. The boundaries of streams extending outside of the study were estimated based on views from the study area and aerial photographs and/or other information from the background information review. Locations of features identified in the field, including wetland or stream flagging, sample plots, key habitat features, and/or key structures were recorded using a Trimble global positioning system (GPS) hand-held device, and maps were prepared using ArcView GIS software by Landau Associates. The average accuracy of the field surveyed points is +/- 1.4 ft with the lowest accuracy being +/- 4.5 ft and the highest accuracy being .1 ft. The field survey accuracy is such that the results are intended for planning purposes only, and should not be used as professional survey boundaries for design, permitting, and/or construction applications. Additional surveying was conducted on select points and features on the Enticknap property by Baseline Engineering Inc. Wetlands identified and/or delineated as part of this project were classified according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS's) Cowardin classification system (Cowardin et al. 1979) and the USACE's hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification system (Brinson 1993). Wetlands were rated according to the Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington (Hruby 2004; Attachment D). This system categorizes wetlands based on their existing functions, including water quality, hydrology, and habitat, as well as the wetland's rarity, sensitivity to disturbance, or irreplaceability. Wetlands were also rated according to the FWRC. Wetland buffers were determined according to Section 19.175.020 (Wetland categories and standard buffers) of the FWRC. Streams were classified according Section 19.05.130 (M definitions) and stream set -backs (buffM This section presents the results of the background information review and the wetland and stream delineations. Information on the wetland ratings and stream classifications is also provided in this section. 8/3/10 YA238\057.030\Metland Enficknap-Bridges Mdoc M I area: 1) Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes (AgC); 2) Bellingham silt loam (Bh); 3) Everett gravelly sandy loam 5-15 percent slopes (EvC); 4) Shalcar muck (Sm); 5) Snohomish silt loam (So); and 6) Tukwila Muck (Tu) (see Attachment B). Soils within the study area that are listed on the Hydric Soils List for King County include AgC and Bh (within depressions), Sm, So (within depressions and floodplains), and Tu (USDA, NRCS 2010). The .FEMA floodplain maps identify the onsite and offsite properties as Zone X (areas outside the 1-percent annual chance floodplain) (FEMA website 2009). StreamNet (StreamNet website a, various dates) and WDNR (WDNR website 2007) identify the following stream located within the study area: A branch of Hylebos Creek (LLID 1223590472610) Tributary to Puget Sound. The City critical areas map shows the above -listed stream and a large wetland complex on the subject properties. The National Wetlands Inventory shows a large wetland complex (herein referred to as Wetland A) within the vicinity of the study area. Wetland A is mapped as including the following community types: palustrine emergent, scrub -shrub, forested, and aquatic bed/open water (Cowardin classification; Cowardin et al. 1979). Attachment A provides the NWI maps. FIELD INVESTIGATION Hylebos Creek flows from the north and enters the study area at the northern property boundary betweAm , the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118) and the Gowers property (Parcel #2921049113) and exten down into the Enticknap property (Parcel #3221049141). The remaining streams identified are entire within Wetland A. Streams Enticknap Stream 1 and Enticknap Stream 2 are entirely within the Entickir property and Bridges Streams 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are entirely within the Bridges property. Bridg] Stream I and Bridges Stream 2 start on the Bridges property (Parcel 2921049103) and extend down oni the Enticknap property (Parcels #2921049112 and 3221049141). An additional stream located on t Gowers property, Gowers Stream, was identified in Wetland A north of the Bridges property. The stre ] and wetland locations are also shown on Figure 2 summarizein Tale 2. The total onsite wetland and buffer areas and stream length were calculated for each of t and d b properties. Stream buffer areas were not calculated because they fall within either wetland or wetland buffer areas. The onsite wetland and buffer areas are summarized in the table below and described in 813/10 YA238\057.030MWetland Enticknap-Bridges�_tm.doc �1 Property Property Size Onsite Wetland Onsite Buffer Major Streams Minor Streams Area Area Length Length ... ....... Entickhap Property 12.70 acres 5.06 acres 4.71 acres 511 ft 76 ft Bridges Property 17.29 acres 14.32 acres 2.90 acres 1,653 ft 1,266 ft Total for Study Area 29.99 acres 19.38 acres 7.61 acres 2,164 ft 1,342 ft A state-owned drainage casement (not mapped) is located east of Parcel #3221049123 on the Enticknap property and intersects Bridges Stream I within a culvert at approximately the intersection of the Enticknap and Bridges property parcels. A grate in the culvert (labeled as outfall from state drainage structure on Figure 2) is located at the approximate intersection point. Based on conversations with City staff, the drainage easement contains a pipe that discharges to Bridges Stream 1. The direction of water flow within the grate was not visible during the site visit, nor could field staff confirm that water was Detailed data on vegetation, soil, and hydrology parameters was recorded at sample plots throughout the subject properties. A summary of these parameters, as well as the classification, rating, and buffer width for each wetland and stream within the study area are presented below, Sample plot data sheets are included in Attachment C. kyllm, "IT, W-0 Wetland A is an approximately 29-acre palustrine forested and emergent/depressional (Cowardin/HGM classification) wetland. All three mandatory wetland criteria are satisfied for Wetland A (see Attachment Q. Vegetation in Wetland A is diverse and includes tree, shrub, emergent, and aquatic bed vegetation layers. Typical dominant hydrophytic species include a canopy of red alder (Alnus rubra), with western red cedar (Thuja plicata), shrub layer dominated by salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), and a ground layer with skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanum) and small -fruit bulrush (Scirpus microcarpus). Emergent and scrub -shrub vegetation include spirea (Spiraea douglasii), cattail (Typha latifolia), small - fruit bulrush (Scripus microcarpus), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens) (see data plots for additional species). Soils in Wetland A are indicated to be hydric based on hydric soils criteria such as presence of redox dark surface (indicator F6), hydrogen sulfide (indicator A4) odors, and loamy mucky mineral (indicator FI). Indicators of wetland hydrology include oxidized rhizospheres and saturated soil and/or a high water table (standing water present at the time of all three field investigations). Wetland A is a headwater wetland for Hylebos Creek and covers approximately 40 percent of the Enticknap property and approximately 83 percent of the Bridges property. Wetland and wetland buffer coverage for each [tarcel is shown on Table 2. Hydrology in Wetland A is sustained primarily by a high groundwater table, 8/3/10 YA238\057-030\ROetland Enficknap-Bridges tm,doc LANDAU AssOCIATES 6 but also receives hydrology from hillside springs, precipitation, and overbank flooding from the ponds and riverine systems. The Enticknap pond located within Wetland A was apparently excavated in the 1970s (Enticknap, R., 2009, personal communication) and the two Bridges ponds (East and West) were excavated sometime between 1960 and 1969 based on aerial photographs (Landau Associates 2009). Beaver activity is also present on the Enticknap pond and both Bridges ponds. Wetland A is rated as a Category 2 wetland under the Ecology wetland rating system (see Attachment D) and as a Category 1 wetland under the FWRC. Under the FWRC a wetland is rated as a Category I if it contains species recognized by state or federal agencies as endangered or.threatened. Coho salmon, a federal species of concern, and steelhead, a federally threatened species, have been sited in Hylebos Creek (StreamNet website a, various dates) (WDFW website 2009) (Appleton, W., 2009, Personal Communication). Hylebos Creek runs directly through Wetland A on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118) and through the northwest comer of the Enticknap property (Parcel #3221049141). Additionally, Bridges Streams 1, 7 and 8 and Enticknap Streams I and 2 are major fish -bearing streams that connect to Hylebos Creek. Wetland A contributes to stream health and habitat by shading of the creeks, contribution of woody debris, and nutrient cycling. The FWRC requires a 200-ft standard buffer width for Category I wetlands. The wetland, streams, and buffer areas within the subject properties are Hylebos Creek is a permanently flowing major stream that flows into the Puget Sound via the Hylebos Waterway, which drains into Commencement Bay in Tacoma. From its headwaters in Federal Way, West Hylebos Creek flows into the Bridges property (parcel #2921049118) from the north, and flows to the south through the center of the parcel and into the northeast comer of the Enticknap property (parcel # 3221049141) where it then flows to the northwest back into the Bridges property. It then flows to the west and under 8"' Avenue South. Within the study area, Hylebos Creek receives water from Wetland A and from Bridges Streams 1, 5, 7, 8 and 9, and the Gowers Stream. At the time of the field investigation, water depth in the channel within the study area ranged from 4 to 15 inches and was flowing south and then west. Channel bank -full width ranges from 6 to 10 ft. Substrate is composed of silt, gravel and fine to medium sand. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. 11 1 111!11111F� upper 200 ft of Bridges Stream I is a minor stream as its size diminishes upstream and does not offer fish habitat. Bridges Stream I originates from a spring at the northern end of the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049103) and flows to the south where it continues through the Enticknap property (Parcel 8/3/10 YA238\057.03MMekland Enticknap-Bridgesim.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES W out 111101 111 ill "I, ��i!!11 �11plipliplip"I 1111 ,1 111',, 111 � I, 11�i I 1 10111 to Hylebos Creek. Bridges Stream I receives water from springs flowing from the hillside along the eastern edge of Wetland A, as well as Bridges Streams 2 and 3, and Enticknap Streams I and 2 and possibly from an outfall maintained by the State of Washington. At the time of the field investigation, water depth in the channel within the study area ranged from 2 to 4 inches and was flowing west. Channel bank -full width ranges from 2 to 15 ft. The channel bank is typically less than 8 inches in height. Substrate is composed of silt and fine to medium sand. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream I shows up on 1936 aerial photograph though its course appears to have been modified since that time (King County website 2009). Bridges Stream 2 is an intermittent flowing minor tributary to Bridges Stream I which drains the portion of Wetland A located on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049103) and flows south to the Enticknap property (Parcel # 2921049112) where it drains into Bridges Stream 1. At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 2 was approximately I ft wide and water depth ranged from 2 to 4 inches. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of shrub and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream 3 is a short permanently flowing minor stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118). At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 3 consisted primarily of a small spring that flows to the south into Bridges Stream I Bridges Stream 4 is a permanently flowing minor stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Bridges property. At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 4 was approximately 3 ft wide and water depth ranged from I to 2 inches. The stream begins near the northwest comer of Parcel #2921049103 where it flows to the south and connects to the East Bridges Pond on Parcel #292104911 L Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of shrub and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream 5 is a permanently flowing minor stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118). At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 5 was approximately 2 ft wide with a water depth of 1.5 inches. The stream flows west through a short culvert and then connects to Hylebos Creek. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream 6 is a permanently flowing minor stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118). At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 6 was approximately 2 ft wide with a water depth of 5 inches. The water source for Bridges Stream 6 is an artesian well. From the Well it flows approximately 100 ft west and into the West Bridges Pond. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. E., Bridges Stream 7 is a permanently flowing major stream that provides an outlet to the East !I I I Iii I 151111i'li ''I I ill I lill Iii 11111 IN I I! I I time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 7 was approximately 6 ft wide with a water depth of 7 inches. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent MMEM= 10111 mama= I Iiiiiiii0i Fil I l! I I ill i MMM Pond on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118) and flows southwest to Hylebos Creek. At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 8 was approximately 2.5 ft wide with a water depth of 5 inches. The stream flows west through a short culvert and then connects to Hylebos Creek. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. 11�111� I I 1111,110=11iiiiiiiiiIi, F Ill: i ill IN 111�� the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118). At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 9 was approximately 3 ft wide with a water depth of I inch. The stream begins at a hillside spring near the eastern side of the Bridges property, and then flows to the east through a short culvert and then connects to Hylebos Creek. Substrate is composed of silt. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. Fdffffl�* MMI� �-�l illill!lliiiiiiiiiiiiii 1111111FIF ill ill FIRM! ii - . a the Enticknap property (Parcel #3221049123). At the time of the field investigation, Enticknap Stream was approximately 3 ft wide with a water depth of 4 inches. The stream forms the outlet to the Entickn Pond, where it flows north and becomes a tributary to Bridges Stream 1. Substrate is composed of sil Riparian vegetation consists of shrub and emergent wetland species. Juvenile coho salmon were observed near the confluence of these waterways. Enticknap Stream 2 is a short (approximately 25 ft) permanently flowing major stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Enticknap property (Parcel #3221049141). At the time of the field investigation, Enticknap Stream 2 was approximately 3 ft wide with a water depth of 2 to 4 inches. The stream flows to the north and connects to Bridges Stream 1. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian With the exception of Hylebos Creek, the streams within the study area were most likely constructed ' to drain and channel water out of Wetland A to allow for farming and livestock ggrazing. T J12" ctreams were most likely excavated at the same time as the ponds. Based on historical aerial photograp] ,, both Bridges ponds were excavated between 1960 and 1969, and the Enticknap pond was excavated in 1970. Discussion with the Enticknap property landowner (Enticknap, R., 2009, personal communication) revealed that species of trout (likely to be resident cutthroat trout, (Oncorhynchus clarki)) are present within the Enticknap pond in Wetland A (Parcels #2921049112 and 3221049123). Ruth Enticknap 8/3110 YA238\057.030\IRMetland Enticknap-BrIdgesjIm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 0 indicated they were not stocked, but instead migrated via Hylebos Creek and Bridges Stream I and Enticknap Stream 1 into the pond. Since both of the Bridges ponds in Wetland A (Parcel #292104911.8) are directly connected to Hylebos Creek through Bridges Stream 7 and Bridges Stream 8, it is assumed that fish species are also present. Additionally, several species of salmon are reportedly present in Hylebos Creek and its tributaries (StreamNet website a, various dates) (Appleton, W., 2009, Personal Communication). Juvenile coho salmon were observed throughout Hylebos Creek in the spring of 2010, as well as at the confluence of Enticknap Stream I and Bridges Stream 1. Landau Associates observed resident cutthroat trout in Hylebos Creek during the May 12, 2010 field investigation. Although fish presence was not identified at the time of the field investigations in Bridges Streams 1, 7, 8 and Enticknap Streams I and 2, they are directly connected to Hylebos Creek, do not contain any fish barriers, and Type F, fish -bearing streams per DNR typing system and are classified as a "major streams" by the City (the City classifies any stream, and its tributaries, which contains or supports, resident or migratory fish as 9. major stream). Major streams require a 100-ft standard set -back, in accordance with the FWRC. Due to their size or lack of fish habitat, Bridges Streams 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and the upper reach of Bridges Stream I are not considered to contain any fish presence and are considered Type N, non -fish bearing streams per DNR typing system and are classified as a "minor streams" by the City. The findings presented herein are based on our understanding of City of Federal Way Code, the USACE and Ecology wetland delineation methodology, Ecology's OHWM delineation methodology, and on our interpretation of the vegetative, soil, and hydrology conditions observed during the field delineation. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, the findings presented in this technical memorandum were prepared in accordance with generally accepted, sensitive area investigation principles and practices in this locality at the time the technical memorandum was prepared. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. This technical memorandum was prepared for the use of the City. No other party is entitled to rely on the information, conclusions, and recommendations included in this document without the express written consent of Landau Associates and/or the City. Further, the reuse of information, conclusions, and recommendations provided herein for extensions of the project or for any other project, without review and authorization by Landau Associates, shall be at the user's sole risk. Wetland areas delineated by Landau Associates are considered preliminary until the USACM and/or local jurisdictional agencies validate the wetland boundaries. Because wetlands are dynamic 8/3/10 YA238\057,030\ROefland Enticknap-Bridges_tm, doe cominunities, wetland boundaries may change over time. The agencies typically recognize wetland delineations for a period of five years following an approved Jurisdictional determination. In addition, changes in government code, regulations, and/or laws may occur that affect regulation of wetlands or NNITZ Appleton, W., 8 October 2009. Personal communication (conversation with Jennifer Wynkoop and Jessica Stone, Landau Associates, hic., regarding fish presence in Hylebos Creek.) William Appleton, City of Federal Way. Brinson, M. 1993. Final Report: A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. East Carolina University, Biology Department. Greenville, North Carolina. Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. August. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C. Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication No. 96-94. Washington State Department of Ecology. Olympia, Washington. March. Enticknap, R. 13 July 2009. Personal communication (conversation with Jessica Stone, Landau Associates, Inc., regarding subject properties and property at 36817 12"' Avenue South). Ruth Enticknap, Federal Way, A. Federal Way, City of 2010. Riparian Corridor Property Acquisitions Preliminary Stream Layout Map. City of Federal Way, SWM division. Map date: May 11. Federal Way, City of. 2005. City of Federal Way Stream Ratings. City of Federal Way, GIS Division. Map date: January 2005. FEMA website. 2009. Firmette. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Accessible from Map Set -vice Center: Ibl�/�nisc.rfeina.eov/webap:)/NNtes/stoi-es/s�ervlet/Fei-naWelcomeView?storeld=I 0001 & eggi o, gld=10001&',1atigld=-L Accessed January. I F I I IF Ii I I I I III 1! 111 11! I� 11 1 F! I I II!!! Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State Weiland Rating System for Western Washington — Revised, 111,1rublication. No. 04-06-025. Washington State Department of Ecology. Olympia, Washington. King County website. 2009. litti)://www.iiielrLokc.00Nv/GIS/ima). King County iMAP. Accessed June 30, 2009. NRCS. 2006. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 6.0. G.W. Hurt and L.M. Vasilas (eds.). United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service in 8/3/10 YA238\057,030\IRMetland Enticknap-Biridgestm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. URL: t2—flft- fc.sc.eirov.usd ,NSSC1l4vdric Soils/Fieldlndicators v6 O.Ddf Accessed July 30, 2009. ja,.gov Olson, P. and E. Stockdale. 2008. Determining the Ordinary High Water Mark oil Streams ill Washington State. Draft. Publication No. 08-06-001. Washington State Department of Ecology. April. Available at: hM,/Iw\,vwecy.Nvavov/biblioIO806001.htmI Reed, P.B., Jr. 1993. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Available at h U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biol. Rep. 88 (26.9). Washington, D.C. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands.- 1988 National Summary. Available U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. StrearnNet Website a. Various dates. Pacific Northwest Mapped. URL: Available at: http://map.streamnet.org/website/. Accessed February 9, 2009. 'ISACE. 2008. Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. - Western Mountains, Valleys, and, it Region. Technical Report ERDC/EL TR-08-13. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Research and Development Center Enviromriental Laboratory. Vicksburg, Mississippi. April. 9,SACE. 1994. Washington Regional Guidance oil the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch. May 23. USACE. 1987. Corpy of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. March. USDA, NRCS. 2010. National Hydric Soils List. Available at littmIlsoils.,usda. yov//Lisci/livdric/lists/staLe.,JltI L11 Accessed May 2T USDA, NRCS. 2006. Soil Survey Geographic Database. Available at htti),"/soildataiiiart.i.ii-cs.tisda pov/. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Ft. Worth, Texas. USFWS. 1981 to present. National Wetlands Inventory Map. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. St. Petersburg, Florida. USGS. 1993, Quadrangle, Washington 7.5-Minute Series (Topographic). Scale 1:24,000. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado. WDFW website. 2009. Species of Concern in Washington State. Available at Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Accessed October 7, 2009. VYTDNR website. 2009. Washington Natural Heritage Program. 1111R.Wwww] --diar-wa.0 Washington Department of Natural Resources. Accessed June 30, 2009. WDNR- 2007. Forest Practices Application Review System, Water Type Map. Available at lffiar$Mj��. Accessed February 9, 2009. 8/3/10 YA238\057-030 Metland Enticknap-Bridgestm,doc LANDAU AssOCIATES 0, WDNR. 2007, StreamNet Interactive Mapper. Available at Accessed February 9, 2009. WSDOT. 2009. 1-5 SRI 81SR] 61 Interchange Improvements. Sheet EV2, 295 of 49 1. February I Attachments: Figure 1 — Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Table I — Methods for Wetland Determination Table 2 — Wetland and Stream Descriptions Table 3 — Wetland, Stream and Buffer Coverage Attachment A — Background Information Attachment B — Soils Series Descriptions Attachment C — Wetland Data Sheets Attachment D — Wetland Rating Forms Attachment E — Site Photographs 813/10 Y;\238\057.030\RWelland Enficknap-Bridgesjm.doc mi lir, Lake Park t+ Penther,Lake .; Vo " wijg i ¢ r 48t Federal Waykr w lj ; a -4 corn d Project Location s cif ikon T , , EI% ii 0 0:5 W Mlles Data Source: ESRI 2008 14� LANDAU Enticknap and Bridges Property" Federal Way, Washington ASSOCIATES Project errett Location : s�aMe.Q ' Spokane Tacoma Federal Way Washington Figure Vicinity Map 11 (D V) (D CL I I E a. U5 0-4, LD to -- '0 0U c -D a 0 0) c CO IOU Cl < U- w (D c -0 0 colO - 45 -j m co NIL 0 a .2 75 a) 0 cu CD , 5 Q,) 0 _0 -0 Oc cu E m -2 . ca m 3: 2N 3: ca 0 -,5 0 .r- C: < LL — — _'D ID _ c: 0 to U- a, 0==O o'D C 1 =5 E -c < M 0 (D Cr C: 0 (D -C CU CD :3 w =3 - 0):E 0) 0-0 — (D U) 0) >, ma) a-U) 0 > .2 S 'E 0 > wp CL= 0 -0 =; 0 (D E a) =1 E 16 to 2 R —Q D to L, -? — C 0 w w 0 CD 0 0 -Z8 ca 0) CU 0) cn-0 M*N CD 0 16 Cl � - Z6Q) 0 C' -,z � E a) < cu 2 a) wQ) 0 LL - a) Q 0 0) 0 2 lc� 0 < a (D :Et :S :E . S t -�5 U) �5 .210 �5 U) a) 15 0 OC 0-0 (10 0 >,.c to to E 00 0 p 0-0 c M D a) ?5 w0 m m 0 E 0 CD (D 0— TJ E 0 c: 0 2 :F; U) M CD = — 'u o- 'c to E -cu -a 0 a) 0 -Z- CD CU —.2 ;p 0) 44--) E ru CD = m C." c 'C' MW 0 m m to 3: p (D cu 3: ') 0 C 0— .2 3:0. 0 C 0 a 0 E� '0 0 0 c 0, C: .4 C () CD CD a: - — :3 0 < -- C: < CD 2 Ca 0 0 A t LL 0) 'O @ OU- CL 0 to a) —0)0.'D to S Q -0 -0 OL cc c 2 7.2 3 iTL �6 C: 0 , E M -p 0 .co a:2 , a r-- ->, < C', S -0 U) CT a) r_ . '0 cc w �: m a) S"R LL a) B-'O, i2 mc go c 0 m 3: c — J- $ 0- -a M CD (D -Do .2 CD Z�: W i3 z r: 0 > -C 0) F- 3to _T 0 U0, w 6 m c m > C: .2) m 0 :3 ac) :3 012 .2) �3 a) �O L) �: , z z 0 0 S to :5 �: 0 m C: 2 0 0 C: 01. 0 -F, E L, ._ m I I Q_ m 0 1 0)'D CO U- 0 LL 0— C: to 8 0 c ED >(D U) t2 E --Z) >' -o �5 - (D M S U) -0 Q) x to (D ai 2 c: ? cu - 2 El U) 0 C .0 co M a) 0 CZ T -Z 0 CD 0) to 5 co = . 0) A'D Eto Cc 0) o) �� -5 En (u Z , .G ca U) -0 C6 -C ca "DC vz c: a L) 7- -00 C: to -0UD O .2 c CD to iz .: 'D 0 U) 0- m 5-62 50 c., C c c -5 �v m >1 Cl So 0-2 q 6 C: 3: 75 = m 0.0 > 0 0 E 2! c to -c w < m 0 -0 0 ca 0 m 0 = V) 0 U) 'C O CD D) 0 < (D O 0- L 0 0 2C 0 to p is 1 C: (- *§ Q, = 0) a) to c U—(n to wo TO) .2 r, T .2, 0 76 E q) -o -0, *E5 —- C: - :� 0 0 :6 - w 0 oc > o .r- m 0.- wco -0 -0 p .2 2 (D to to ca -0 0 0 't a) < 0 to 0.-0 L) U- 0 'C' be 2 3: L c-) -5 .2 p CR 0) c� .U) Ca := b) 4) 0 = �a Ic . I; a) 0 -r- 0 C a) C', '0, W"B .20 (D 0 0 :t-- c -5 -C, 'a c C :O 0 i6 �5 , =to 0 CD c .- CL — �-= E 2 2 5 QA 0 0 0 r- to 0 W .�a) C13 cc (A .r- A Cc N a) O C: = , 0 c Cc C 0 C C: @ E > 0 to -ruv2 04 Z: — 0. 0) - 0 U) (DO-020 Om > -�! c m Z.� -, .F= =; C a) =3 2 cD >0 F- (D -D cp) c C.N 0 -41 2 B C: c x x E 0 0 U) m 0) C) 0 2 U) 00 -0 E5 c 0 (D -2 V, M Lq = U-0 to -SC '�- 2 E . - - - 0 04 0 X 0 — 2 0-0 m to co OD S m O0..2 u� :6 16 -2 c: 2 cr 2 a) M -0 E 2 m E -o a) N *c: 0 co L) c S 0 OM 0 M -Fu (D C: 0 3- OTD .0- Lo 0 C a C: 0 E 0) 0 m a) O)o C: 4� 0 2 E 4! .a M QD @ @ A 0 Ca ID CL to 3:-o= 2 w2:S U) LU 0 U) U) TABLE2 WETLAND AND STREAM DESCRIPTIONS System Classification Category (Rating Agency) Buffer Width (City) Wetland A PFO,PEM1 E and AB3, 11 (Ecology) 200 ft Kbx / Depressional I (City) Hylebos Creek Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) Type F (DNR) 100 ft Bridges Stream 1 Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft (Tributary to Hylebos Creek) Type F (DNR) Bridges Stream 2 Intermittent Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Tributary to Bridges Stream 1) Type N (DNR) Bridges Stream 3 Perennial Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Tributary to Bridges Stream 1) Type N (DNR) Bridges Stream 4 Perennial Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Flows to East Bridges Pond) Type N (DNR) Bridges Stream 5 Perennial Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Tributary to Hylebos Creek) Type N (DNR) Bridges Stream 6 Perennial Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Flows to West Bridges Pond) Type N (DNR) Bridges Stream 7 Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft (Tributary to Hylebos Creek) Type F (DNR) Bridges Stream 8 Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft (Tributary to Hylebos Creek) Type F (DNR) Bridges Stream 9 Perennial Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Tributary to Hylebos Creek) Type N (DNR) Enticknap Stream 1 Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft (Tributary to Bridges Stream 1) Type F (DNR) Enticknap Stream 2 Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft (Tributary to Bridges Stream 1) Type F (DNR) 8/3/2010 y:\238\057.030\R\Tbl 2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 3 y s; i s- L- LL LL LL LL LL LL � 0 0 n a a TH n N �a LL LL F cs LL LL LL LL N N v Ln m m en m m m n V1 u m Q a v v m 0 W LL LL w vs LL Ln V) +n � a 0 m N p rn ® N m 00 N +y Tu v a a u u u u u u L m m m m m m Ol 0 M oR Q wt. LL r LL LL U) LL U W V) V} N r, M N 0 U) 0) M N `P i1 41 d a u u u u u u m 1® m m m m m m 0 N Sri ea�i ^ Q �o LL LL LL ® LL u W (A V) sn W V) cn w ea a 0 H V) m r. m fY1 cry N s!1 ay m ui qt n r m N N N N � N en n P--e m rJ 00 m .`ra � � -1 o 1-1 r v v �, a a) a O 0 0 O O m Y u u u d u u ® - :. a a a a a LLJ m` y. Source: Coastal Atlas Map, Washington State Department of Ecology: URL http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/atias—home.htmi LANDAU AsSOCIATES Enticknap and Bridges Properties Federal Way, Washington USGS Topographic and USFW NWI Layers I,N % c r 3: Z 2 IN IL Do a v x m 0 c 'a lG a X m Z u gn M --a E LU P� a- Q 7 A a C" M co CY co -a 0 E E .0 c c rc 3: rm m m c a ej I Y 10 goo 0 .-0 2 6-0 UDI w U :3 -1 LU w AL w a o -i z zae Z 11 V? k M p! I r711 El Li 47-1r-d0 N 47-1&30 N 47-16-20 N 47-16-10 N 47-16-0 N 11 0 1 C: U) CD 0) 0) C: :2 'F CD U) CO (D -0 C: a 0 M M - C: CL .0 C: ui U- 0 1 0 - * . I a # I - - . . 0 :�WVM. Hi Tre M�m - ,Ig 04 --- 47* 16' 29" 47' 16' 10" Map Scale: 1:2,760 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11 ") sheet. a, N meters 0 25 50 108 -- 150 Foet 0 100 200 400 600 47' 16' 29" 47' 16' 10" USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey P--� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Soil Map —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties Map Unit Legend King County Area, Washington (WA633) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 9.5 25.3% percent slopes Bh Bellingham silt loam 2.7 7.3% EvC .. ..... Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent .. . 6.1 16.1% slopes S m Shalcar muck 0.5 1.4%® So Snohomish silt loam 4.7 12.5% Tu Tukwila muck 14.1 37.4%® Totals for Area of Interest 37.7 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes— Enticknap and Bridges Properties 1 King County Area, Washington • • Area, Washington AgC—Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 50 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 60 inches Mean' annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 180 to 220 days Map Unit Composition Alderwood and similar soils: 95 percent Minor components: 5 percent Description of Aiderwood Setting Landform: Moraines, till plains Parent material. Basal till with some volcanic ash Properties and qualities Slope: 6 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 24 to 40 inches to dense material Drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 18 to 37 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity: Very low (about 2.5 inches) Interpretive groups J1 Land capability (nonirrigated): 4s Typical profile 0 to 12 inches: Gravelly sandy loam 12 to 27 inches: Very gravelly sandy loam 27 to 60 inches: Very gravelly sandy loam Norma Percent of map unit., 1 percent Landform: Depressions Bellingham Percent of map unit., 1 percent Landform: Depressions Seattle Percent of map unit., 1 percent Landform: Depressions Tukwila Percent of map unit: 1 percent USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes — King County Area, Washington Landform: Depressions Shalcar Percent of map unit. 1 perce Landform: Depressions Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5127/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 Map Unit Description: Bellingham silt loam —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties I �� ll!!'Illllliiiiiiiii l�� ..11111 111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111 � I i I 1111111111 i11111116LE Jill Map Unit Setting Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 degrees F Frost -free period: 150 to 210 days Map Unit Composition Bellingham and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Description of Bellingham Setting Landform: Depressions, drainageways Parent material., Alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Very high (about 12.6 inches) Available water capacity. Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 5w Typical profile 0 to 11 inches: Silt loam 11 to 60 inches: Silty clay loam Minor Components Seattle Percent of map unit., 5 percent Landform: Depressions Alderwood Percent of map unit. 5 percent Everett Percent of map unit.- 5 percent Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 SD Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 11 of 1 Map Unit Description: Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes —King Enticknap and Bridges Properties County Area, Washington • County Area, Washington Map Unit Setting Mean annual precipitation: 30 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 degrees F Frost -free period: 180 days Map Unit Composition Everett and similar soils: 100 percent Description of Everett Setting Landform: Terraces Parent material: Glacial outwash with a component of volcanic ash in the upper part Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacityofthe mostlimiting layerto transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity., Low (about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 3e Typical profile 0 to 17 inches: Gravelly sandy loam 17 to 32 inches: Very gravelly sandy loam 32 to 60 inches: Very gravelly coarse sand Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 Map Unit Description: Shalcar muck —King County Area, Washington King County Area, Washington Sm—Shalcar muck Map Unit Setting Elevation: 50 to 700 feet Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 55 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period., 150 to 190 days Map Unit Composition Shalcar and similar soils: 75 percent Minor components: 25 percent Enticknap and Bridges Properties Description of Shalcar Setting Landform: Flood plains Parent material: Herbaceous organic material and/or alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Very poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: Frequent Available water capacity: High (about 10.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 5w Typical profile 0 to 14 inches: Muck 14 to 28 inches: Fine sandy loam 28 to 60 inches: Loamy sand Minor Components Tukwila Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions Seattle Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Depressions Norma Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions. Puget Percent of map unit. 5 percent Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 I a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Shalcar rnuck®King County Area, Washington Snohomish Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Depressions i I'll 1K 14 1#1 Enticknap and Bridges Properties USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 AINK Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page*2 of 2 Map Unit Description: Snohomish silt loam —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties So —Snohomish silt loam Map Unit Setting Elevation: 10 to 300 feet Mean annual precipitation: 22 to 50 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F Frost -free period: 160 to 220 days Map Unit Composition Snohomish and similar soils: 70 percent Woodinville and similar soils: 20 percent Minor components: 6 percent Description of Snohomish Setting Landform: Flood plains Parent material. Alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches Frequency of flooding: Occasional Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity: High (about 11.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 5w Land capability (nonirrigated): 5w Typical profile 0 to 11 inches: Silt loam 11 to 17 inches: Clay loam 17 to 27 inches: Mucky peat 27 to 60 inches: Loamy fine sand Description of Woodinville Setting Landform: Flood plains Parent material., Alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Snohomish silt loam —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties Frequency of flooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity., Very low (about 1.6 inches) Typical profile 0 to 7 inches: Silt loam Minor Components Seattle Percent of map unit.- 2 percent Landform: Depressions Tukwila Percent of map unit. 2 percent Landform: Flood plains Shalcar Percent of map unit.- 1 percent Landform: Flood plains Sultan Percent of map unit: 1 percent Soil Survey Area: King • Area, Washington Survey Area Data- Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 �w Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 Map Unit Description: Tukwila muck —King County Area, Washington • • Area, Washington Tu—Tukwila muck Map Unit Setting Elevation: 30 to 750 feet Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 80 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period.- 150 to 200 days Map Unit Composition Tukwila and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Description of Tukwila Setting Landform: Flood plains Parent material: Herbaceous organic material Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Very poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: Frequent Available water capacity.- Very high (about 24.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 5w Typical profile 0 to 19 inches: Muck 19 to 60 inches: Stratified diatomaceous earth to muck Minor Components Seattle Percent of map unit.- 15 percent Landform: Depressions Bellingham Percent of map unit.- 3 percent Landform: Depressions Norma Percent of map unit.- 2 percent Enticknap and Bridges Properties USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Tukwila muck —King County Area, Washington W-MrOMMERCTIO M-T-TO M, I I I Vn I q lei I Enticknap and Bridges Properties OSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 am Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 o 0 U a! C C E m s dQ ry u® a d co 3 c r d v Z m a 0 :3 c_ m O. a (DN w ( c0E a m `o soi aai o ® N 'omE m `E w m O` is U U C' V N w -00 a> w x at N c Z a0 LO w W 3 Q &n c Q '` 1 ca C) CV �`�' a 4y E 0 .2 4 Q E a U.oZ C C C N Q y Z U) V9 ® m N N 0. 0. m � O a) Q 9D Q O O m L Q9 C QD - Q Q CM O 0.' N O a 0 c '>1 d O 2r O O 0. E ,' c0 m 4 QN E Q = c a m Em o Ca ¢ O s ay_ (= A J Z= N N Y> i QD O ® . E c OD N E .w4+ as In cy m "` s :n 0. ®D fn Z > 47 w is 4 0-5:, O o c c6 (!) a 4 ca s c a n En 3 ca �y o0r.� a q m r w m w UUvsU) ai dco oQ w ° ca W0 �a® y �LEmEm ® ro 2 H a E i'aihna SU -S U) U) ® a- u o m Q7 m A n C m p O m n U s U) _rn m n C:= w a d cv m m O 7 N r �-+ O 4 W C E sm. 70 U d umq`y FA 61 6m1 OmP N O (6 «m U 3 0 C',O a c J J d A LL C7 ` R LL a O CL Yt to a � 0 ¢ o m u) :? m Z Q qd a LL oC � N 66son3 sdn cn> vwe > o an `o ® Qum n's cna a CO on Q a >> vo m a m U Y dU G ?C ONo O O m T N n cn m m C) unU)C us n• o a X + C O O > + III e7 A`k Ili .0 a y WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Enticknap Property City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: 7/8/09 Applicant/Owner:Cfty of Federal Way State: Washington Sampling Point: SP-1 Investigator(s): Jessica Stone, Sacha Maxwell SectionfFownship/Range: Sec 32, T21 N, R04E Landform: depression Local Relief (concave, convex, none)concave Slope% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 47 Long 122 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: King County Area, Washington NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X* No (Explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are circumstances "Normal®? Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Explain in remarks if needed)Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map with sampling point locations, transects, and important figures Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies all three mandatory wetland parameters. The c summer Is the sampled area within a wetland? Yes X No of is classified as a PEM depressional VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants, Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum %Cover Species? Status Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size 4.5 m 2 3 4 5 Herb Stratum (Plot Size 3 m 1 Agrostis gigantea 2 Equisetum arvense 3 Alopecurus pratensis 4 Festuca arundinacea 5 Vica sp. 6 Galium aparine 7 8 9 10 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size 1 2 Total % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrophytic vegetation criteric Total 10 5 2 2 94 Total no Z FAC FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU )minance Test Worksheet: mber of Dominant Species at are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 Dtal Number of Dominant pecies Across All Strata: :nt of Dominant Species are OBIL, FACW, or FAC! 100% revalence Index Worksheet: otal % Cover of: Multiply by: )BL Species x 1 = ACW Species x 2 = AC Species 90 x 3 = 270 ACU Species 4 x 4 = 16 'PL Species x 5 = :olumn Totals: 94 (A) 286 (B) Prevalence Inclex= B/A 3.0 ydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% X Prevalence Index is<3.01 Morphological.Adaptationg (Provide supporting data in Remarks) —Wetland Non -Vascular Planta Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatioh (Explain) - present, unless disturbed or problematic. or. ".. 1"a"MrIff.m. MR. Sampling Point: SP-1 SOIL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-10 2.5Y 3/2 80 1 OYR 4/6 20 C PL silt loam dry, crumbly 10+ 2.5Y 3/2 50 1 OYR 4/6 30 C silt loam dry 2.5Y 8/1 20 D I Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grain'tLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR's, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (excepMLRAl) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Thick Dark Surface (Al2) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) and wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth: Yes X No Remarks: Soils dry, moistened for color determination. Data plot satisfies hydric soils criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (Bg) Water -Stained Leaves (139) High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2,4A and 413) (MLRA 1, 2,4A and 413) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Drift Deposits (133) X Oxidized Rhizospheres along Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (_RR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Wetland Hydrology Present? Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Yes X No Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) (includes Capillary Fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Data collected during mid -July during dry period, additional hydrology likely present earlier in season based on existing vegetation and so Data plot satisfies hydrology criterion based on presence of a primary indicator (C3). Landau Associates, Inc Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region WETLAND T I TI DATAWestern Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Enticknap Property City/County: Federal WaylKin2 Sampling Date: 7/8/09 Applicant/Owner: City of Federal Way State: Washington Sampling Point: SP-2 Investigator(s): Jessica Stone, Sacha Maxwell Section/Township/Range: Sec 32, T21 N, R04E Landform: depression Local Relief concave, convex, none noncave Slo a /®� 8_ ( ) p® Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 47 Long 122 Datum.: Soil Map Unit Name: King County Area, Washington NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X' No (Explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are circumstances "Normal"? Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Explain in remarks if needed)Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map with sampling point locations, transects, and important figures Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies all three mandatory wetland criterion. The data plot is classified as a PFO depressional wetland. *Very dry sumo er VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: Tree Stratum %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species (Plot Size 6 m } That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 1 Alnus rubra 40 yes FAG 2 Salix sitchensis 30 yes FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Acer circinatum 10 no FAC Species Across All Strata: 7 - 4 80 Total Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (Plot Size 4.5 m ) 1 Spiraea douglasii 20 yes FACW 2 Rubus spectabilis 20 yes FAC Prevalence Index Worksheet: 3 Malus fusca 15 yes FACW 'Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 4 Sambucus racemosa 10 no FACU OBL Species 40 x 1 = 40 5 FACW Species 65 x 2 = 130 65 Total FAC Species 110 x 3 = 330 Herb Stratum FACU Species 10 x 4 = 40 (Plot Size 3 m ) UPL Species x 5 = 1 Lysichiton americanum 4t yes OBL Column Totals: 225 (A) 540 (B) 2 Equisetum arvense 20 yes FAC 3 Athynum filix-femina 10 no FAC Prevalence Index= B/A 2.4 4 Stachys chamissonis 10 no N) 5 Ranunculus repens 10 no FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6 X Dominance Test is >50% j X Prevalence Index is<3.0' g ! Morphological Adaptations g (Provide supporting data in Remarks) 10 Wetland Non -Vascular Plant 90 Total Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatioh(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology mus be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 1 2 !Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrophylic vegetation criterion. fl au MMINMT InC. VIRMM Muli all! 5, M F] S ICn SOIL Sampling Point: SP-2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features _Ltnches)_ Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc' Texture Remarks 0-8 1 OYR 2/1 100 muck saturated Type: C =Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand GrainbLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR's, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (Al 0) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (excepMLRAI) Other (Explain in Remarks) X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) and wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth: Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydric soils criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Water -Stained Leaves (139) High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 413) (MLRA 1, 2,4A and 413) X Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (BI) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAG -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (_RR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (l.-RR A) Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Wetland Hydrology Present? Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Yes X No Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) to surface (includes Capillary Frinqe) Remarks: Data plot 3221..1=11 21 -andau Associates, Inc Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region WETLAND T I TI DATA FOR - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Enticknap Property City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: 7/8/09 ApplicanVOwner: City of Federal Way State: Washington Sampling Point: SP-3 Investigator(s): Jessica Stone, Sacha Maxwell Section/Township/Range: Sec 32, T21 N, R04E Landform: depression Local Relief (concave, convex, none)concave Slope% 2 Subregion(L): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 47 Long 122 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: King County Area, Washington NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X" No (Explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are circumstances "Normal"? Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Explain in remarks if needed)Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map with sampling point locations, transacts, and important figures Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No 7 Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies all three m11 andatory wetland criterion. The data plots classified as a PEM depressional wetland. *Very dry summer VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants, Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: Tree Stratum %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species (Plot Size 6 m ) That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 1 Salix lucida 15 yes NI 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 7 4 15 Total Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum That are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 100% (Plot Size 4.5 m ) 1 2 Prevalence Index orksheet:; g Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 4 OBL Species 30 x 1 = 30 5 FACW Species 50 x 2 = 100 - Total FAC Species 6 x 3 = 18 Herb Stratum FACU Species 5 x 4 = 20 (Plot Size 3 m ) UPL Species x 5 = 1 Ranunculus repens 150 yes FACW Column Totals: - 91 (A) 168 (B) 2 Scirpus microcarpus 30 yes OBL 3 Rumex crispus 5 no FAC Prevalence Index= B/A 1.8 4 Cirsium arvense 5 no FACU 5 Equisetum arvense 1 no FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: g X Dominance Test is >50% 7 X Prevalence Index is<3.0' g ^ Morphological Adaptations ^ g (Provide supporting data in Remarks) 10 Wetland Non -Vascular Plants ^Problematic 91 Total Hydrophytic Vegetatioh(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology mus be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 1 2 IHydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrophytic vegetation criterion. n au ssocla es, Inc. Wesrern P15MMains, a, y; , InZI oaf gt n SOIL Sampling Point: SP-3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc' Texture Remarks 0-18 10 YR 2/1 100 muck w/ silt saturated Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand GraintLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR's, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) X Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (excepMLRAI) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) and wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present)* Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth: Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydric soils criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) X High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 415) X Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Drift Deposits (133) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Algal Mat or Crust (134) Living Roots (C3) Iron Deposits (135) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes N Water Table Present? Yes X N Saturation Present? Yes X N (includes Capillary Fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, mon! 0 X Depth (inches) 0 Depth (inches) 18 in o Depth (inches) to surface toring well, aerial photos, previous 1 Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrology criterion. Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 413) Drainage Patterns (B 10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) IlLRR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No �M Landau Associates, Inc Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region WETILAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Enticknap Property City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: 7/8/09 Applicant/Owner: City of Federal Way State: Washington Sampling Point: SP-4 Investigator(s): Jessica Stone, Sacha Maxwell Section/Township/Range: Sec 32, T21 N, R04E Landform: depression Local Relief (concave, convex, none)roncave Slope% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 47 Long 122 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: King County Area, Washington NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X* No (Explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are circumstances "Normal"? Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Explain in remarks if needed)Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map with sampling point locations, transects, and important figures Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Yes No X Remarks: Data plot satisfies none of the three mandatory wetland criterion. The data plot is classified as upland, *Very dry summer VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: Tree Stratum %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species (Plot Size 6 m 'That are OBIL, FACW,or FAC: 0 1 2 'Total Number of Dominant 3 - Species Across All Strata: 0 4 Total Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum 'That are OBIL, FACW, or FAC: (Plot Size 4.5 m 1 2 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 3 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 4 OBIL Species x 1 = 5 FACW Species x 2 = Total FAC Species 12 x 3 = 36 Herb Stratum FACU Species 88 x 4 = 352 (Plot Size 3 m UPL Species x 5 = 1 Lolium perenne 88 Yes FACU Column Totals: 100 (A) 388 (B) 2 Agrostis capillaris no FAC _5 3 Festuca arundinacea 5- no FAC Prevalence Index= B/A 3.9 4 Alopecuris pratensis 2 no FAC 5 lHydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6 Dominance Test is >50% 7 Prevalence Index is<3.01 8 Morphological Aclaptationt 9 (Provide supporting data in Remarks) 10 ^ Wetland Non -Vascular Plantq 100 Total Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatioh (Explain) Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology musl The present, unless disturbed or problematic. 1 2 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Yes No X Remarks: Data plot does not satisfy hydrophytic vegetation criterion. 173-nzlzin Assoclamg, IM7 MR9177n lViouMa"Ing, 751TVs, art O Coa-ETTKe—g—lon SOIL Sampling Point-. SP-4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc? Texture Remarks 0-12 1 OYR 4/2 98 7.5YR 4/6 2 C PL silty loam dry, crumbly Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand GrairKocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR's, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric SojIS3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (Al 0) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (excepMLRAl) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Dark Surface (Al 2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) and wetland hydrology must be present, -Thick Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth: Yes No X Remarks: Data plot does not satisfy hydric soils criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reqt Surface Water (Al) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (131) Sediment Deposits (132) Drift Deposits (133) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Iron Deposits (135) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No Saturation Present? Yes No (includes Capillary Fringe) I Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, rd; check all that apply) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 4B) Salt Crust (1311) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living •. (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Varp-jJJrvi 62r* • (Explain in Remarks) X Depth (inches) X Depth (inches) X Depth (inches) mmffl odill-weigi Remarks: Data plot does not satisfy hydrology criterion. ;econdary Indicators (2 or more required -Water-Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2,4A and 413) Drainage Patterns (1310) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) ¢RR A) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Landau Associates, Inc Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Bridges Property City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: 7/8/09 Applicant/Owner: City of Federal Way State: Washington Sampling Point: SP-5 Investigator(s): Perry Welch, Jessica Stone Section/Township/Range: Sec 32, T21 N, R04E Landform: depression Local Relief (concave, convex, none)roncave Slope% 0 Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 47 Long 122 Datum' Soil Map Unit Name: King County Area, Washington NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X* No (Explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are circumstances "Normal"? Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Explain in remarks if needed)Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map with sampling point locations, transects, and important figures Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric Soil Present? Yes= X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies all three mandatory wetland parameters. The data plot is classified as a PEM depressional wetland. • J 1--up—ROPIT Tree Stratum (Plot Size 6 m 2 3 4 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size 4.5 m 1 2 3 4 5 Herb Stratum (Plot Size 3 rn I Holcus lanatus 2 Ranunculus repens 3 Juncus effusus 4 Alopecurus pratensis 5 Plantago major 6 Trifolium repens 7 8 9 10 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size 1 2 % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: Data plot satisfies hy Absolute Dominant Indicator %Cover Species? Status Total Total a 25 20 15 5 5 100 Total Total vegetation criterion. yes yes yes no no no FAC FACW FACW FACW FACU FAC IDominance Test Worksheetk Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ITotal Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 Percent of Dominant Species 'That are OBIL, FACW, or FAC: 100% Prevalence Index Worksheet: 'Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBIL Species x 1 = FACW Species 60 x 2 = 120 FAC Species 35 x 3 = 105 FACU Species 5 x 4 = 20 UPL Species x 5 = Column Totals: 100 (A) 245 (B) Prevalence Index= B/A 2.5 ydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% X Prevalence Index is<3.01 Morphological Adaptationg (Provide supporting data in Remarks) —Wetland Non -Vascular Plantd Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatloh (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology m be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Sampling Point: SP-5 SOIL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc' Texture Remarks 0-10 1 OYR 2/2 95 5YR 4/6 5 C PL silt loam moist 10-16 1 OYR 2/2 90 5YR 4/6 10 C PL silt loam moist Type: C =Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand GrairibLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR's, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (All 0) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (excepMLRA1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Dark Surface (Al 2) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) and wetland hydrology must be present, -Thick Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) unless disturbed or problematic. -Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth: Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydric soils criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Water -Stained Leaves (139) X High Water Table (A2) (except MILRA 1, 2,4A and 4P (MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 413) X Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Drift Deposits (133) X Oxidized Rhizospheres along Imagery (C9) -Algal Mat or Crust (134) Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) -Surface Soil Cracks (136) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) (_RR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Wetland Hydrology Present? Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 9 in Yes X No Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 8 in (includes Capillary Fringe) I Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrology criterion, Landau Associates, Inc Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Wetland name: Wetland A WETLAND RATING FORM— WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 — Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Name of wetland (if known): Wetland _A Date of site visit; A ril 19, 2010 and May12 2010 � Rated by: Le Trained by Ecology? Yes X No Date of training: 6/18/2008 SEC: 32 TWNSHP: 21N RNGE:_ 4E Is S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes— No X Map of wetland unit:- Figure 2 — Estimated size: 29 acres — SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland: 1 11 X III IV Category I = Score > 70 Score for Water Quality Functions 24 Category II = Score 51 - 69 Score for Hydrologic Functions 16 Category III = Score 30 — 50 Score for Habitat Functions 26 Category IV = Score < 30 TOTAL Score for Functions 66 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTCS of Wetland 1 11 Does not apply _2L(preliminary j Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above") FWRC Cat I Summary of basic information about the wetland unit. Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the S -ecial characteristics found in the wetland, 7777,77-- 'Ul, jr, W6 0'' SP 1. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened oi- Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Cate or _1 Natural Heritage Wetlands (see 19 of data fortn). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain X SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or X in a local management plan as having special significance. Wetland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page I of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A Classification of Vegetated Wetlands for Western Washington FreshwaterAre the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? *96jo YES — the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? +Tidal ffyour welland canbe classified as a Freshwaterr wetlands.r is rated as an Estuarine welland. Wetlands that were call estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the terni "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and H estuarine wetlands have changed (seep._ 1 The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. f Y The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does ` entire wetland meet both of i • .... vegetation —The veaetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any on the surface) where at least 20 acres (Sha) in size; . least 30%of open water area is deeper than 6.6 (2 in)? wetland4. Does the entire wetland meet all of the following criteria? The is on r es' can be very + --The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. The water leaves the fi without being impounded? Surfacer' does notpondtypes wetlands 'r occasionally shallowdepressions or behind (depressions are rlly <3ft diameter and less than;' +f • • class is Slope 5. Does the entire wetland meet all of the following criteria? • -The unit is in a valley or stream channel where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or • The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit cancontain depressions that. tI: f to i class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time of the year. This means that any outlet, if present is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO —go to i class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but o obvious slopeNo — go to 8 YES — The wetland class is Depressional & Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a may gradeinto ♦ riverine floodplain,or , small strewn, depressiondepressional wetlandhas a zone of floodingi•sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICHOF THEHYDROLOGIC REGMESD `li ► IN 1UESTIONS 1-7 APPLTO DIFFERENT ratingAREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the system if youseveral. present within your wetland. the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wedand unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit, classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. f r :- Riverine Sloperessional D` • TidalSalt Water +. i any other class of wetlandfreshwater offi • •'.. If you are unable Mill to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or you have more than within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating, Wetland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7l06) IN �-, I ��D groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of oppot-tunity aj)p�j� X Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems. X Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or 2 stream that has flooding problems Other YES multiplier is 2 No multiplier is I TOTAL — Hidrolozie Functions MultiElz the score from D3 by D4; then add score to tabLe=.,l 16 Comments Wetland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 4 of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A �;., ,E,t.. '�„, .�tt"�+,,... �,�.►�r.,a�r .,.. �.u.,§� �a�,'� �,$.tix.�a��,��,�„�a��ut�,�w�s��,��t��au�w��ae�N4�.�.N��.xc< �.s ��.a m t„a��.�a. ,nK�.,. HABITAT FUNCTIONS — Indicators that wetland functions to provide ioantihabitat (only r boxer ) j Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species? 1A Vegetation structure ;(see P.72): Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin) — Size threshold for each class is 114 acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. Aquatic Bed X Emergent plants X Scrublslrrub (areas. �l ere shrubs have > 30% cover) 4 X Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 77the unit has ea j rested class check if. X The forested class has 3 out of 3 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground- cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon. ,odd the number- of vegetation types that qualify. if l ou have.° Map of Cowardin vegetation classes 4 struc.ttrres or more ,;....apoints = 4' 3 structures ...points = 2 2 structures ..... .....--points = 1 1 structure,,..,.... :........points = 0 1.2 Hydrolaeriods (seep.73): - Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10•% of the wetland or 114 acre to count (tee teat for° descriptions of J�ydr•operiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4?or more types present points = 33 Seasonally fltloded os° inundated 3 or snore types present points = 2 Qccasitrna"flooded dr inundated 2 types present . points = 1 X Saturated only I type present... ».....» ...... points = 0 X Pernaarterttly flog ittg treart, or r iaer in, or adjacent to, sitevetDand Seasonally flowing strearrr in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lalze-fringe �t etlantl . ... = 2 points pt s � ^stet tidal °eiland...»......4 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3 Richness of Plant et°res (seep. 75): Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle. If you counted: > 19 species .......................points = 2 5 — 19 species ...................,points = 1 2 List species below if you want to: < 5 species.........................points = 0 1.4 Interspersion of Habitats (seep. 76): Decided from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation (described in IA), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, love, or none. Note: If you have 4 or more classes or 3 vegetation classes and open water, the rating is None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points always "high". _1 3 Use map of Cowardin classes 0}�4 k 55 [riparian braided channels] Hi h = 3 ints _ H 1.5 Snecidl Habitat Features ;(see p. 77): Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number ofpoint you put into the next column. X Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in. diameter and 6 ft. > long). Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 incites) its the wetland X ` Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft. (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft. (I in) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft. (10rn) 5 X Stable steep banks of fine rrratdrial that ruight be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) t I1 signs of recent beaver activity are present (etas shrubs or trees that have not txa.t trar-rrctlgre,)s^'brarr�ra) X At bast ld4 acre of thiir-sterrratred persistent aegetatir n or tt^oody branches are present in areas that are perrnanentl y or seasonally inundated (strtrrctart°etgfor egg -leaving by a niphibians) lnvasrvo tastts cot^er less tlrar 25`"iea ttf the a rctland area its etic(r stratum of plants It JE. lie (t% statdd in eo'ly pr iraiirags of fhe manual on page 78 is an error. 1 TOTAL Score — potential for providing habitat Add the points in the column above 17 Wetland Rating Fonn — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 5 of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A 2 Does the wetland have the opportunity, to provide habitat for many species? (only t score, er box) H 2.1 Buffers (see P. 80): Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed". ® 100m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer (relatively undisturbed also means no grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use). . ........... points = 5 100 (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference ........... .......:. ........ ...... .. ........points = 4 ® 50 (170 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, Por open water > 95% circumference ............................. ...x.,,r: ., .....,. ,........,..... points = 4 2 ® 100 (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference .,....... .......... ....... ......... ........e ,,,,...,. ......... ,..............• points = 3 50 (170 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference ...... ....... ....... .... ....... ............... .. ..... :.............................. points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above: No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 (80 ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are O................................... points = 2 X No paved areas of buildings within 50m of wetland for > 50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK......... ..... points _ ® Heavy grazing in buffer .......................... ........ ........ ......... .,...... ....,.points = I Vegetated buffers are s 2m wide (6.6 ft) for more than 95% circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland) ... .. points = 0 _ Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above.......... _ Arial photo showing buffers 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft. wide, has at least a 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (Danis in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES = 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.2 H. 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian 0 or upland) that is at least 50 ft. wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to. estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake - fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.3 H. 2.2.3 Is the wetland: • Within 5 mi (8k) of a brackish or salt water estuary O • Within 3 miles of a large field or pasture (> 40 acres) OR YES = 1 point • Within 1 mile of a lake greater than 20 acres? NO = 0 points Comments: Wetland Rating Fonn — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 6 of 9 H 2.3 Near- or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see p. 82): Which of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft. (I 00m) of the wetland? NOTE: the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. These are DFW definitions. Check with your local DFW biologist if there are any questions. X Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha (2 acres) Cliffs: Greater than 7.6in (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. Old -growth forests: (Old growth west of Cascade Crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings, with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm. (32 in) dbh or > 200 years of age. • Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80 — 200 years old west of the Cascade Crest. Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants) where greases and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 — 2.Om (0.5 — 6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages. Oregon white Oak: Woodlands stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%. • Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that would otherwise be isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha (10 acres) and is surrounded by urban development. Estuary/Estuary-like: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands, usually semi -enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low -energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean -derived salts measure less than 0.5 ppt. during the period of average annual low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons. Marine/Estuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags, mature trees, dunes, meadows) that are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g,, sand/rock/log recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control). If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats .= 4 points If wetland has I priority habit ...= 1 point If wetland has 2 priority habitats .............. = 3 points No habitats ...............................= 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. (Nearbv wetlands are addressed in juestion H 2.4). H 2.4 Wetland LandSCaDe: Choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits (seep. 84) . There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. . ....... points = 5 * The wetland is Lake -fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake -fringe wetlands within 1/2 mile ................. ................... ...... .... _._ ........ points = 5 - There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed........ ....... __ ...... ...... points = 3 * The wetland fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake -fringe wetlands within1/2 mile ........................................... .......................................... points = 3 - There is at least I wetland within 1/2 mile ........................................................................... points = 2 - There are no wetlands within 1/2 mile ...................N......,:......,........ ......... points = 0 H 2 TOTAL Score — opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.1, H2,2, H2.3, T[2.4 M� Total Score for Habitat Functions TOTAL for H I fi-om page 8 rd K a Add the points for H 1 and H 2; then record the result on p. I 1 26 Comments: wa• a KM�Tlfew MITTM, r rr IMMY02 �111 and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wedand Type - Check of ff any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1 Estuarine ivetlands? (seep.86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? The dominant water regime is tidal, Vegetated, and With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES =GotoSC 1.1 NO X SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, -National Park, National Estuary Reserve, -Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC Cat. 1 332-30-151? YES = Category I No = go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following conditions? YES =Category I NO = Category II Cat. I The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no dikinp,, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native species. I the non-native Spartina species plant spp,. are only that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual rating Cat. 11 The area of Spartina would be rated a Category 11 while the relatively undisturbed Lipper marsh with native species would be a Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of I acre, Dual At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft. buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed Rating or un-mowed grassland The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, III or contiguous freshwater wetlands. SC2 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a natural heritage wetland? (This question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact 14"NHPIDAT.) S/T/R information from Appendix D or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site YES Contact WNHP/DNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? Cat I YES = Category 1 NO X - not a Heritage Wetland 'SC3 P2gs (seep- 87) Does the wetland (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its function. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? YES = go to question 3 NO = go to question 2 2. Does the wetland have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? YES = go to question 3 No = is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? YES = Is a bog for purpose of rating NO = go to question 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 4. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine. WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover (> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? Cat. I YES = Category I No = X Is not a bog for purpose of rating Weiland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 8 of 9 Welland name: Wetland A S C4 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland have at least I acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you ivill still need to rate the wetland based on its function. Old -growth forests: (west of Cascade Crest) Stands of at least two three species forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm or more). NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two -hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growtli forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 — 200 years old OR have an average diameters, (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53 cm); crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth. Cat. I YES = Category I NO =—X not a forested wetland wift_s ecial characteristics sc5 Wetlands in CoastaLLI&tins (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks. The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom.) YES = Go to SC 5.1 NO X not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing) and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft. buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. Cat. I The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square ft.) YES = Category I No =Category 11 Cat. 11 SC6 Inter anal Wetlands (seep. 93) Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES = Go to SC.6.1 NO = X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on itsfunctions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: - Long Beach Peninsula -- lands west of SR 103 - Grayland-West ort -- lands west of SR 105 - Ocean Shores7opalis — lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre or larger? YES = Category -11 No = go to SC 6.2 Cat. 11 SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and I acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and I acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics -al categories, and record on p. 1. Choose the "highest" rating if wetland falls into several NA If you answered No for all types enter "Not Applicable" on p. I Comments: Wetland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 9 of 9 Legend Emergent Vegetation ® Scrub/Shrub Vegetation Forested Vegetation Data Source: King County GIS, Bing Maps Aerial . Scz�e in Fee' Enticknap and Bridges Properties Map of Cowardin Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington Vegetation Classes — ASSOCIATES 50 50c� Data Source: Kinq County GIS, Bing Maps Aerial ocz�e n', Fee' Enticknap and Bridges Properties Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington a of roerios ASSOCIATES ig west at the emergent wetland in the southwest corner of the Enticknap Parcel #3221049141) near SP-01. 2. Soils and high water table in the emergent wetland area in the southwest corner of the Enticknap Property (Parcel #3221049141) near SP-01. Enticknap and Bridges LANDAU Properties Selected Site Photographs ASSOCIATES Federal Way, Washington Figure -1 3. Looking north at the forested wetiand area an the Enticknap Property (Parcel 3 fycSP-02. Enticknap and Bridges ...:: Properties • Photographs Federal r r L - --------- Looking southwest at the west Bridges pond on the Bridges Property (Parcel ti 121049103). Enticknap and Bridges Selected Site Photographs Properties FRCdI ral Way, Washington as LL I 11 ca 2E (1) r 0) S OL 0 c U) Cl) a) Ui 0) ca 0 L) CU CL ID 0 X o U) L) LL Z 0 C) U) , I k UL CL E E O a) E ro V5 U) C 8 CL E V5 w >, 0 0 tb _JD j C-p FW-hmg-, T- TO: City of Federal Way-SWM 215 Columbia Street P.O. Box 9718 Seattle, Washington Federal Way, WA 98063 98104 Attn: Jeff Wolfe Ref.# Riparian Corridor Enticknap SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #2 PNWT Order Number: 697133 Seller: Enticknap Buyer : City of Federal Way The following matters affect the property covered by this order: 2 & A Full Update of the Commitment from August 26 through 2 "1 a. asc 1use the following - SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT NUMBER 1 IS HEREBY INCORPORATED. a The following paragraph(s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated; 15, 16, and 17. 0 The following has been added as paragraph 18: 18. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID- SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2010 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 292104-9112-04 LEVY CODE: 1205 AFFECTS: Parcel C CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $20,000.00 Improvements: $0.00 AMOUNT BILLED GENERAL TAXES: $247.12 SPECIAL DISTRICT: $2.25 TOTAL BILLED: $249.37 PAID: $124.69 TOTAL DUE: $124.68 • There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since August 26, 2010, EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. CM OF FEDERAL WAY CDs' 6=�= TO: City of Federal Way-SWM 215 Columbia Street P.O. Box 9718 Seattle, Washington Federal Way, WA 98063 98104 Attn: Fei Tang Ref.# Riparian Corridor Enticknap SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #1 PNWT Order Number: 697133 Seller: Enticknap Buyer : City of Federal Way The following matters affect the property covered by this order; • A Full Update of the Commitment from May 1, 2009 through 6, 2010 at 8:00 a.m. has disclosed the following: • Paragraph 8, 9, and 10 of the commitment is/are out, 2009 taxes are paid in full. 0 The following have been added as paragraph's 13, 14, 15, 16, and 1 13. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: I YEAR: 2010 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 322104,(914_' 04 LEVY CODE: 1205 AFFECTS: Parcel A CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE. Land: $45,000.00 Improvements: $0.00 AMOUNT BILLED GENERAL TAXES: $556.03 SPECIAL DISTRICT: $2.85 I ME= FWWSIVMTRWi� 14. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAX 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2010 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: .322104 6 LEVY CODE: 1205 AFFECTS: Parcel 3 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $170,000.00 Improvements: $169,000.00 GENERAL TAXES: SPECIAL DISTRICT: AMOUNT BILLED $4,188.78 $85.15 $3.00 — ------ 00 T-A BILLED: ' I $6 4,276.93 PAID:$2,138.47 TOTAL DUE: $2,138.46 /.The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as partially exempt. If the exemption is disallowed by the sale of said premises, the death of the exempt taxpayer, or other loss of 5.trt4noxempt status, full or partial amounts for current and/or prior years, if any, will be due. lot AX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 09 NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE AT 206-296- 3920 OR ONLINE AT IIWWW.KINGCOIRgY.G.OV/ASSESSOR" TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2010 ZA c4c — c2 LZ— TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 32 '2 09 LEVY CODE: 1205 AFFECTS: Parcel CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: 33,600.00 Improve ts: $6,100.00 BILLED GENERAL TAXES: m 82.31 SPECIAL DIS3: $2.40 TOTAL BILLED: $284.71 PA 2.36 TOTAL DUE- $142.35 (continued) H • ro.-�� GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: 7-12 -?(IZ- YEAR: 2010 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 4-911 LEVY CODE: 1 AFFECTS: Parcel C CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE. Land: 0.00 Improvements: $0.00 AMOUNT BILLED GENERAL TAXES: ---4, 355� $177 0 There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since May 1 2009, EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. Dated as of August 31, 2010 at 8:00 a-Ta WN ITWW�� My: Curtis Goodman Title officer Phone Number: 206-343-1327 a PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 Title officer, Curtis Goodman (curtisgoodman@pnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Rob Chelton(robchelton@pnwL.com) Unit No. 12 FAX No. (206)343-1330 Telephone Number (206)343-1327 P.O. Box 9718 Title Order No.: 697133 Federal Way, WA 98063 Attention: Fei Tang Your Ref.: Riparian Corridor Enticknap A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date4 May 1, 2009, at 8:00 a.m. A. ALTA Form 2006 Owner's Policy Amount TO BE AGREED UPON Standard (X) Extended Premium Tax (9.5%) NOTE: IF EXTENDED COVERAGE FOR OWNERS OR LENDERS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR A PENDING •. PLEASE NOTIFY US AT LEAST ONE WEEV PRIO".: TO • SO THAT WE MAY INSPECT THE •. C. ADDITIONAL PARCEL CHARGE Amount Tax (9.5%) $ 350.00 $ 33.25 $ 100.00 $ 9.50 2. The Estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple. 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: EDWARD L. ENTICKNAP, also appearing of record as E.L. ENTICKANP and RUTH ENTICKMAP, husband and wife 4. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. A.L.T.. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: Lot 1, King County Short Plat No. 878122, recorded under Recording Number 7907250602, being a portion of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 32, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, • County,• • Lot 2, City of Federal Way Short Plat Number 00®104768-OOS , recorded under Recording Number 20010315900004, in King County, Washington, being portion of the following described property: The north 794 feet of the west half of the east half of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter and the north 836 feet of the west half of the east half of the east half of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter all in Section 32, Township 21 North, Range 4 East W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to King County for street purposes by deed recorded under Recording Number 5558466. The west 264 feet of the south 165 feet of the south half of the east half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 29, Township 21 North, Range 4 East W.M., in King County, Washington. The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. i- i JJ and , PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. A.L.T.A COMMITMENT Schedule B Order No. 697133 I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. II- Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. S. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. B. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming A lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached. A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: RESERVED BY: Vernon E. Golden and Iris J. Golden, his wife PURPOSE: Riding trails and for the movement of equipment necessary for the maintenance AREA AFFECTED: West 20 feet of Parcel B and other property RECORDED: June 29, 1968 RECORDING NUMBER: 6369667 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: RESERVED BY: Vernon E. Golden and Iris J. Golden, husband and wife PURPOSE: Riding trails and for the movement of equipment necessary for the maintenance of lakes, streams and fences AREA AFFECTED: The west 20 feet of Parcel C RECORDED: July 3, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER: G533873 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: State of Washington PURPOSE: Maintain a drainage system including culverts and ditches, but not exclusive thereof AREA AFFECTED: Portions of Parcel B RECORDED: July 9, 1971 RECORDING NUMBER: 7107090228 (continued) T-4 - I? A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 3 4. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS CONTAINED IN SHORT PLAT: RECORDED: July 25, 1979 RECORDING NUMBER. 7907250602 AFFECTS: Parcel A 5, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS CONTAINED IN SHORT PLAT: RECORDED: March 15, 2001 RECORDING NUMBER: 20010315900004 AFFECTS: Parcel B, 6. RELEASE OF DAMAGES AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BY; Vernon E. Golden and Mrs. Iris J. Golden and King County, Washington RECORDED: September 19, 1963 RECORDING NUMBER: 5639973 AFFECTS: Parcel B and other property 7. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: RECORDED: March 20, 1963 RECORDING NUMBER: 5558466 GRANTEE- King County AFFECTS: Parcel B Said instrument is a correction of Deed recorded under King County Recording Number 5540293. 8. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOV-EMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2009 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 322104-9141-04 LEVY CODE: 1205 AFFECTS: Parcel A I ------- — CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $45,000.00 Improvements: $0.00 AMOUNT BILLED GENERAL TAXES: $484.12 SPECIAL DISTRICT: $2.85 TOTAL BILLED: $486.97 PAID: $243-49 TOTAL DUE: $243.44, (continued) 5 /-� A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 4 9. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2009 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 322104-9123-06 LEVY CODE: 120'5 AFFECTS: Parcel B CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $170,000.00 Improvements: $238,000.00 AMOUNT BILLED GENERAL TAXES- $4,389.40 SPECIAL DISTRICT: $85.15 $3.00 TOTAL BILLED: $4,477.55 PAID: $2,238.78 TOTAL DUE. $2,238.77 10. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2009 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 292104-9112-04 LEVY CODE: IT951- AFFECTS: Parcel C CURRENT ASSESSED VALUEi Land: $20,000.00 Improvements: $0.00 AMOUNT BILLED GENERAL TAXES: $215.17 SPECIAL DISTRICT: $2.25 TOTAL BILLED: $217.42 PAID: $108.71 TOTAL DUE: $108.71 11. Payment of Real Estate Excise Tax, if required. The property described herein is situated within the boundaries of local taxing authority of City of Federal Way. Present Rate of Real Estate Excise Tax as of the date herein is 1.78%. M A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 5 C2. Until the amount of the policy to be issued is provided to us, and entered on the commitment as the amount of the policy to be issued, it is agreed by every person relying on this commitment that we will not be required to approve any policy amount over $100,000, and our total liability under this commitment shall not exceed that amount. NOTE 1-. our examination discloses that the vestee herein does not own any contiguous property. NOTE 2: The name and address of the current taxpayer according to the King County Assessors record is: Edward L. Enticknap 36817 12 th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 AFFECTS: Parcel A E. L. Enticknap 36817 12 th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 AFFECTS: Parcels B and C rp Van � �* 10 M -I Diane Gibbs Any inquiries should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. "I MN/6369667, 6533874 and 7908200486 // 7 City of Federal Way-SWM P.O. Box 9718 FederalWA 98063 Attention: Fei Tang Order No.: 697133 Your Ref.: Riparian Corridor Enticknap Please find enclosed a copy of a Commitment for Title Insurance on the above referenced transaction, as requested. Thank you for the opportunity to serve you. Pacific Northwest Title Company of Washington, Inc. takes great pride in the service and customer satisfaction we are able to provide our customers. If we can answer any questi,ons or provide further assistance, please feel free to call. Title Officer Unit No. 12 M r + (PARCELS ■ +, : + (PARCEL PACMC NORTHWEST rnTLE Order No. Company of Washington, Inc. IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. (!9) t 111, i i I i 14 k' I I log 111 M, I A *e171IMM 4 10 1 =mall Note: Lot Closures are based or! the bearings and distances appearing on the fihal�ptat document which have been rounded oft to the nearest second and 1/100th of a foot respectively. Acoordingly, the areas shown hereon are approximate and may contain an error of several feet due to the precision with which they were calculated ff TIPI-L40- N 1010'39..O"E 84.100 S 88047'20..O"E 184..580 N 1-14'15.0"E 405210 S 89000'30,0"E 444.310 N 1035'12..1"E 165..010 S 89000'30.,O"E 264.010 S 1035'12,.O"W 165.010 S 89000'30-.O"E 218750 S 86008'08,.O"E 1175.920 Delta= 104815.0" Radius = 1175.920 Length � 37 028 S, 8905437..5"E Choid = 37-027 Tangent = 18.516 N 87056'23"W 1175920 S 200396.0"W 542.460 N 8804356,.O"W 473970 N 1014'54O"E 86.070 IkJ 88047'M.0"W 62K.700 Closing point is 0 10 S, and ..002 W of beginning point. Axea = 553294.007 •Sq..Ft, 12.7019 aci-es. I l!')etimetei length = 3699.21 ff'x-ecision of'closure = I in 3518.37 FT--T.Tq#mgl N 1010'39..O"E 84A oil S 8804'7'20,.O"E 184-5 N l"1415ff'E 405.2 S 89000'30,0"E 4443 N 1"35'12,.O"E 165.0 S 89000'30,0"E 264��O 1 S 1035'12.0"W 1650 # S, 53009'48..OW 123-0 1 IS 63045'l 1.0"W 188A 1 S 1014'54.0"W 329, 1 N 88047'20O"W 628.71 Closing point is .008 S and .005 W ofbeginning point. Ai -ea. = 3 003 1 K 855 Sq.Ft Ai -ea = 6,8944 acres. Peiimetei length = 298133 Precision ofelosure = 1 in 322022 S 88043'56,0'!E- 473.970 N 2003'360"E 23.480 • 87024'110"W 222.050 • 24057'52.0"E 84 630 • 2003'36.0"E 120..000 S76006'18..1"E 193.210 N 2003'36..O"E 358,570 S 87056'24O"E 1175-920 Delta= 1'48'15,.0" Radius = 1175.920 Length = 37.028 Tangent = 18..516 N 860008'09"W 1175.920 N 89000'30.0"W 218:750 S 53009'48 0"W 123,040 S 63045'11.0"W 188.460 S 1014'54.0"W 415370 Closing point is 003 N and .004 W ofbeg' nning point, Area = 217771.578 Sq-.Ft Alea = 4.9993 acres.. Peiirnetei- length = 2458-56 Precision of closure = 1 in 551674 I C'Ty OF FEI)ERAL WAy I CDS EndeknapBoundwy LiheAdjusftmt, Lot Closures con 't Page 2 of 2 Closing point is.,000 S and MO W ofbeginning point. Area = 35202..226 SqTt Area = 0.. 8081 aci es - Pefimetei length = 780,30 Preci Prep aredby: BASELINE Engineefing Inc, Date: Monday, July 19,2010 Filename: 10026 LOT CLOSURES2.doc Job No 10-02�- r-w ®Au 14 ASSOCIATES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO. Jeff Wolf. ,��... E uo4 FROM. Jessi4 one DATE: August 3, 2010 (WETLAND AND STREAM INVESTIGATION AND ELINEA'TI l ,A� .ENTICKNAPAND BRIDGES PROPERTIES CDS 'Dr' -WAVj-WMYN`GTON----- .. At the requestof the City of rLandau•ciates conducted wetland and stream delineation on two properties c• of five adjacent. • located in Federal Way, Washington (Figure 1). The Enticknap property consists of three parcels; parcel #3221049141, parcel #3221049123, and parcel #2921049112 (collectively called Enticknap property), owned by Ruth Enticknap, located east of . . west of r Bridges property consistsof • r. parcel #2921049118 .1r parcel • •' 14• 13 (collectively called Bridges property), owned by David Bridges, located east of 8h Avenue South and west of 12'h Avenue South, • additional adjacent parcels were investigated as part of r for r wetland • and thep include• . •. which consists of parcel #3221049112and the Gowers property which consists of parcel #2921049113. This technical memorandum presents the results of the of the study area. South,The subject properties are located within the Puyallup/White watershed (Water Resource Inventory Area 10), Hylebos Creek basin in Township 21 N, Range 4 E, Section 29 and 32, and east of 8'h Avenue • of 1 • . and stream investigationr of r . ►•the sumouncling11 ft which represents1 a buffer width runningareas under the City of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC). The Enticknap property consists of 12.71 acres and the Bridges property consists of 17.22 acres in size. The Enticknap property primarily consists of forested land and contains one man-made pond and the North fork of West Hylebos Creek (Hylebos r northwestern • Bridges property primarily consistsof r . -.• 11 r • vegetation with a large forested area located immediately west of • t contains . man-made ponds with Hylebos• property. r property 950 Pacific Avenue, Suite 515 • Tacoma, WA 98402 ® (253) 926-2493 • fax (253) 926-2531 .landauine.com 1 rll Legend Culvert Wetland 200 FT Buffer Y - - Stream (Not Delineated) ---- Welland Boundary (` LAI Sample Plot ��. King County Tax Parcel - - - Welland Boundary Estimated Spring T Data Source: King County GIS Bing Maps Aerial >-- Major Stream Enticknap and Bridges Property LANDAU >— Minor Stream Federal Way, Washington II. ASSOCIATES " 91Black and while reproduction of this color original may reduce its effectiveness and lead to incorrect interpretation.. f'.. 2 Location of pond and streams per WSDOT 1-5 SR15/SR101 Interchange Improvements" sheet EV2, 295 of 491 dated 2/10109.. 3 Approximate location of pond and streams per "Riparian Corridor Property Acquisitions Preliminary Stream Layout Map" prepared by City of Federal Way SWM Division dated 5/11/10, A 150 Q Scale in Feel Figure Site Plan is (0 r LANDAU AssOCIATES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM M I GWWa4rA I WWa K=WU FROM: Jennifer Wynkoop 4� &TE: October 16, 2004 RE: WETLAND AND STREAM INVESTIGATION AND DELINEATION ENTicK-NAP PROPERTIES FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON At the request of the City of Federal Way (City), Landau Associates conducted a wetland aut stream delineation on two properties, parcel #3221049141 (southwest parcel) and #2921049112 DR Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington (Figure 1). This technical memorandum presents the results of the wetland and stream delineations and is provided for use by the City to assess and document the The study area is located within the Puyallup/White watershed (Water Resource Inventory Area 10), Hylebos Creek basin in Township 21N, Range 4 E, Section 32, east of 8"' Avenue South, north of 372'd Way. The study area for the wetland and stream investigation consists of the subject properties, plus 200 ft surrounding it (which represents the maximum buffer width for critical areas under the City of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC). Parcel #3221049141 is 5.35 acres and #2921049112 is I acre in size. Both consist of vacant forested land. 73T-ffinii� This section presents the methods used to delineate the wetlands and streams on the subject property. The extent of wetlands and streams off the subject properties was observed from within the subject property boundaries. Estimation of the extent of off -site wetlands and streams was made from field observations and readily available public domain resources as described below. N Legend Sample Point Wetland Boundary Wetland Buffer � Outfalt (Delineated) Hands N Wetland Boundary Stream Deliniated (Approximate) M Enticknap:Parcel Stream (Apporximate) Data Sources: King County GIs; ESRI Imp a Server Enticknap Wetland LANDAU Federal Way, Washington ASSOCIATES Note 1. Black and white reproduction of this color' original may reduce its effectiveness and lead to incorrect interpretation. 0 150 0 Scale in Feet 'I 1 1/'+ OT I Z+, PARCEL 1 - VACANT \f4 BARB WIRE STREAM (I -WIRE -5. LEDERAL WAY PARCEL 2 - 368J-_-,\1 2TH AVE SOUTH 4 FENCE 71 'WIDTH ,,,--END BARB FENCE -TV v ire N WASHINGTON FEE L WAY, WA 20' WIDE EASEMENT FOR \11 (FENCE DOWN TO PARCEL 3 - VACANI' RIDING TRAILS & MOVEMENT WL-51 EAST) OF EQUIPMENT PER REC. N89'00,30"w 10' WIDE NO. 6533873 ?64.01' VEHICUL) 72.2 0 C/L OF 12- WIDE., r: 200 1 N �R ACCESS W/- 1 4 WIDE CONFL (APPROX.) WIDE. N. I DP3 VEHICULAR ACES A 1_:) �� E44)4t�7 SPRING ILVERT E. END 54" WIDE. STAR ROTECTIO )5) BARB WIR 40" HI. CULVERT IE=67.0'± \'\'6 20' WIDE DRAJ?AGE FEND ___BUFFER Z;-t E43 10' WIDE 72-7 EASEMENT PRR REC. 04 LAI E42 A&I NO. 71070 VEHICUL 228 HWM-S (APPROX N PIPE 18"C NC. CULVERT 1 WIDE 10' WIDE STREAM _\ 6 S?' I IE=6*6'±, SE. TACK, STREAM N&S, 5' WIDE S89'00'30"E E4 1�78,5 0 1� "6 CONFL_ 7 S89,00,301 jt37 411 )UND 5�4 CONFL. I STREAM E. CONFL. 4 POND 2 6 77. 32 1 9,0 _11 /_0 E40 10 - ELEV=7i.0,± S,,;� - 0'30"E 12' CONFL. 2 444-31' zz N& STIR S 5 M E. W IDE CONFL 2 E2 LAI E3 OH O-N -1 41, .1 All E r1. c FOUND 5/8" RE AR C W/"12899 N C 5/18/1, 39 6 (J� PC CAP W/"12899 ''C N FL, 6 82 30' 0 C CLEAVE" 0-3'±S M O-S E38 HW HWM I-N LAI E4 0 WM C13 TYPE-11 POND I S LAI E6 7 OHWM I-S 1.0 SHED LAI E5 RIM=72.05', DDER W. OUTFALL F E7 tZ7 IE�68.9'± I CONC. N SPRING Hou X I, Pump El /NW- & S_ LAI DP2 61 "w C/L OF 12'-30 7' HOUSE C/L 0 12' WIDE C/L OF 10' 8 ep,• F WIDE �V L LAI E8 VEHICULA ACCESS ACCESS , fHICULAR U F WIDE VEH. CB TYPE-1 A C C ES SHED LJIG RIM=76.85' Z T CONDI E3 IE=72.6'± 1 CONC. N, 8' L6 )'LAI E9 E35 0 CONC. S_ Vis �TCAA`tC IE=72-5'± 1 LIMITS, OF SEPTIC E33 j 4' TALL SP DRAINFIELD MARKED U/ 8 7 � 10 LATH AR ED D F C/L C 3n" WIDE'V,� VEHICL < C/L OF 12' WIDE--� 2 GE ACC E3 VEHICULAR ACCESS 2 RIGHT Ell EY SLOPE� DIA _TA ?Vf E 4, Z) 0 -bill 77.9 LAI E2 9 '28-' 0' WIDE DRAINAGE L PERPRE E3a. X E12 SEMENT PER REC, OIL F�R,LiR CAP 0 ALONG b 8 �7, 24 156-0 0, 7107,09022 16" 4W 2 CD 'cY N: 2460' V� E13 X GE_ Uj LAI E28 CN n 16, BLDG. COR.- ?- 25' WIDE DRAINAGE 16" LAI E27 0 A;7 8. 0 B AVENL 0.5'+ N_ OF c EASEMENT PER REC, NO. J1, NO, 2 RIM=95-33', LADDER, N_ 7 10 7'0 9 0 2 ?"a Z LINE LAI E26 ... .. 1982 LAI E22 zo,�- 22 P v 1031 6 IE=90-O'l 18" CONC�, OLD E 14 LAI E25 N. & S-17.,w 0 54,'3�1 \ - We ). P17 93 0 42" 1 WOOD 1180_79�6 E24 12 0 158.2 U �P6� 7 BARN A WI A I .11000 18,9'47'20"W i Al 2 N E15 �E21 LAI E23 1�\ k" 184.58' 78.4 "I&D QUES 00 103.6 32, 20', WIDE EASEMENT FOR cn LAI DP4 -OHL �q _61LA & U/ 10 I:cr� DIP RIDING TRAILS MOVEMENT 102 a, 3SE 87.6 1.3 0 /,OF EQUIPMENT PER REC, 116" "'v �E2 101 0 oa Ll NO. 6366667 CE d 200' BUFFER 2" E18 -0 2 12 1 WET -11AYE� 1 8 ND) 1040 9 628 70'/ V)4" 2b*' IE= ------ 159.2 IE= ;"'Ji 87,1 S88-47'20"E c C OF�\') 2' WIDE --,_,gB TYPE- 4' SPLIT RAIL CB TYPE-1 �3 -11". 1 -- 11 2 34 RIM=156�8 FENCE (WOOD) RIM=109.31' 1 VEHICULAR ACCESS 00 r- Ir IE= 152. VA IE=106.3'± 18" CONC. SE. FOUND 1/2" REBAR W/ CAP IE=152-0'i r6 CN 30' IE=106.2'± 18" CONC. NW. CIJ QD S8 77, 0 EDGE Or Z: �D CN #10708 0.2'±W. & 0-2'±S- � 6 E C"i OF LOT COR_ cf) VEHICULAR ' ACCESS FOUND 1/2" REBAR W/ CAP #10708 '�- z 1, ��e 10-7 9 AT NE COR OF 8" SQ. FENCE POST, 7 T" 159.8 ->`-588`43'S8 T 15 CB TYPE -II 2 0.6'±W & 0.1'±S OF LOT COR. RIM=129.01', LADDER,CB TYPE-1 4' SPLIT RAIL RIM=156.7- 4' SPLIT RAIL (PLASTIC) EAST, C W OOD, IE=125.8'± 18" CONC. E. RIM=145.99' 3 IE=125.2'± 18" CONC. NW. IE=141.7'± 18" CONC. F FENCE (PLASTIC) SOUTH, 4' WOOD SPLIT RAIL N&S 1' 11 IE=150.8'