Loading...
17-101944CITY OF �. Federal Way June 28, 2017 F .. Fma CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Jeff King Email: Aim PO Box 331 Milton, WA 98354 Re: File #17-101944-00-PC, PREAPPLiCATiON CONFERENCE SUMMARY Marchand Building (.Development in Wetlands), Parcel: 218820-4490, Federal Way Dear Mr. King: Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development Review Committee (DRC) held May 18, 2017. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting was helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted. This letter summarizes comments given to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC. The members who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff fi-om the City's Planning and Building Divisions and Public Works Department, and representatives from Lakehaven Utility District and South King Fire and Rescue. Some sections of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) and relevant information handouts are enclosed with this letter. Please be advised, this letter does not represent all applicable codes. In preparing your formal application, please refer to the complete FWRC and other relevant codes for all additional requirements that may apply to your project. The key contact for your project is Leila Willoughby -Oakes, 253-835-2644, leila.�riIlou�llb�- oakesncittioffedera_lt_r.L7y.coln. For specific technical questions about your project, please contact the appropriate DRC representative as listed below. Otherwise, any general questions about the preapplication and permitting process can be referred to your key contact. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed residence with a business use or home occupation on 0.3 acres located on the King -Pierce County border. The subject property contains a stream, wetlands and possibly geologically hazardous areas. MAJOR ISSUES Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and information submitted for preapplication review. These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in the plans. These major issues only represent comments that the DRC consider most significant to your project and do not include the majority of the comments provided. The major issues section is only provided as a means to highlight critical requirements or issues. Please be sure to read the entire department comments made in the next section of this letter. Jeff Kino June 28,2017 Pace 2 + Planning Division • The applicant shall apply for a concurrent Process IV `Hearing Examiner' and a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review for development within a wetland. • The applicant must obtain federal and state approvals for work within a wetland. • There appears to be no access. • Complete a forest practices application if more than 5,000 board feet of merchantable timber is harvested (one truck load). The subject property is undeveloped and forested. • Public Works Traffic Division ■ Transportation Concurrency Management (FWRC 19.90) — Transportation concurrency permit with application fee of $1,620.00 is required for the proposed project. • Traffic Impact Fees (FWRC 19.91) — Traffic impact fees are required for single-family residential dwelling units. • Frontage Improvements (FWRC 19.135.040) — Construct street frontage improvements along the property frontage on Pacific Highway S (SR 99). • Access Management (FWRC 19.135.260) — The development shall meet access management standards. Access restrictions will likely be required. An on -site turnaround will also be required. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the preapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions, please contact the representative listed for that section. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT —PLANNING DIVISION (Leila Willoughby -Oakes, 253-835-2644, Leila.►villougliby-oakesr'citvoffederalway.com Land Use Review Process — The subject property is in the RS 15.0 zone. The RS 15.0 zoning district permits detached dwelling units pursuant to FWRC 19.200.010; however, it does not permit non- residential and/or commercial uses. There are no required review processes for a single family home except for a residential building permit. However, a stricture is proposed within a wetland per the city's critical area mapping, and must be reviewed through Process IV, Hearing Examiner. Process IV is an administrative review conducted by city staff, with a final decision issued by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. The Process IV decision criteria are contained in FWRC 19.70.150.2(a)-(f). The decisional criteria for development within wetlands are contained in FWRC 19.145.430(2) and variance decision criteria are contained in FWRC 19.45.030. Further proposed wetland impacts must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable; remaining unavoidable impacts must be then minimized, and finally compensated per FWRC 19.145.130(5) and FWRC 19.145.140(1)—(10) to the extent appropriate and practicable. Prior to the Process IV public hearing, the Director of Community Development will issue a decision under FWRC Chapter 19.115, Community Design Guidelines, related to building and site design, and the CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) principles in conjunction with the 17-101944-00-PC Doc ID 7�917 .fell' King .tune 28. 2017 Page 3 Process III land use decision. The Director's design decision is appealable to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner. Reasonahle use of the sathject property is processed using a Process IV application pursuant to the review criteria contained in FWRC 19.145.090(3)(a)-(e) except for applications on single family residential lots may use a Process III. As the higher Use Process application applies for development within a wetland, the highest level of process that applies to any of the individual applications applies (Use Process IV), unless the applicant does not propose development either partially or entirely within the wetland. The land use approvals will be reviewed under one application per FWRC 19.15.060. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review is processed concurrently with Process IV applications, with initial public notice of application being issued after determination of complete applications. Following issuance of a SEPA decision and the Process III and design guideline decision, the Hearing Examiner conducts a public hearing for a Process IV application(s) and issues a written decision(s). A Process IV development submittal requirement checklist and master land use application are enclosed. Building permits can be issued after land use approval and a SEPA determination is granted and appeal periods concluded. Meetingfollow-up: The RS 15.0 zone permits home occupations pursuant to FWRC 19. 270.030. The appl [cant must obtain a business license from the City of Federal Way Finance Department to operate a home occupation. 2. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) — The project is subject to environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as the proposed development will be undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by water pursuant to Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-1 1- 800(1)(a)(i) The City serves as the Responsible Official for the environmental review and an environmental checklist must be submitted and reviewed prior to the City issuing an environmental threshold determination. All property owners within 300 feet of the site are notified of that decision. The notification includes a 14-day comment and 21-day appeal period. SEPA review must be concluded before land use approval may be granted. Public Notification —The Use Process application and SEPA determination requires three separate notices (Notice of Application, SEPA, and Notice of Public Hearing). Within 14 days of issuing the Letter of Complete Application, a Notice of Application will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, mailed to persons within 300 feet of the subject property, posted on the subject property, and placed at the City's three designated notice boards. The applicant is responsible for posting a public notification sign prepared by the City for a Process IV. Notice will be given in the same format for the City's SEPA determination and Notice of Public Hearing 14 days prior to the public hearing date. I The City's critical area mapping depicts a Category 11 (old -rating system) wetland encumbering the entire subject property. The Planning Division recommends you delineate the wetland boundaries and classify the wetland by submitting to the study for review by the city's third party consultant before submitting your land use applications. Wetland reports are valid for five years pursuant to FWRC 19.145.410 and the approved federal wetland delineation manual. after such date the city shall determine \khether a revision or additional assessment is necessary. 17-101944-00-PC Due ID 75917 .Ieff King .tune 282017 Page 4 The applicant is required to submit three (3) sets of stamped mailing envelopes to persons receiving tax statements within 300 feet of the subject property. The City's G1S Division provides this service for a nominal fee or the applicant may provide their own mailing envelopes via King County Assessor records or a title company. Please find the enclosed mailing labels bulletin for further information. 4. Clearing, Grading, Tree and Vegetation Retention — The proposal is subject to the provisions of FWRC 19.120, "Clearing, Grading, and Vegetation and Tree Retention." A clearing and grading plan that meets FWRC 19.120.020 and FWRC 19.120.040 must be submitted with the formal land use applications. The site is subject to tree density requirements of FWRC 19.120.130(1); note that 25 tree -units per acre are required for an RS15.0 zoned site, minus any proposed public or private streets and regulated critical areas. Trees located within critical area buffers (but not within the wetland itself) can be credited towards satisfying the tree units per acre requirement. Tree unit credits are in table 2 of FWRC 19.120.130-2. A tree unit is a value assigned to existing trees retained on the property or replacement trees. The larger the tree, the greater value it is assigned. Required tree density can be composed of retained trees and replacement plantings per FWRC 19.120.130. (Note: required landscaping trees may be counted in tree density.) The tree and vegetation plan must clearly show where the tree units are to be located.. The tree and vegetation retention/replacement plan must be prepared by a certified arborist or certified landscape architect and must include information about tree unit credits and replacement. The subject property is densely forested and contains a wetland. Pursuant to FWRC 19.120.010 the city discourages the indiscriminate removal or destruction of trees and vegetation or other natural features, which shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. Any future clearing, grading or tree removal actions on the subject property require city approvals. Forest Practices Permit — The City has assumed jurisdiction over the review and approval of Class IV -General Forest Practices permits. A forest practices application form (enclosed) must be completed if more than 5,000 board feet of merchantable timber is harvested from the subject property. This is approximately equal to one log truck of timber. Tile City will review the proposed Class IV -General Forest Practices in conjunction with the Land Use application. Please include details of such activity in the environmental checklist as the Class IV permit is not exempt from SEPA review. 6. Environmentally Critical Areas — The subject property contains critical areas and/or associated buffers: wetland, stream and geologically hazardous areas (GHA). Pursuant to FWRC 19.145.080, a critical areas report that adequately evaluates the proposal and probable impacts is required. Tile report must also demonstrate that all reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to the critical areas per FWRC 19.145.130 "Mitigation Sequencing." The applicant is responsible for covering the cost of the City's consultants who may review the reports per FWRC 19.145.080(3). Wetlands— Delineation and rating of the on -site wetland will be required to determine the exact impacts to the wetland and wetland buffer. The application shall identify and characterize all wetlands 17-101944-00-IT Doc ID 7i917 Jeff Kina .lone 28. 2017 Pace 5 and buffers on and within 225 feet of the subject property (FWRC 19.145.410(e)). See FWRC 19.145.410-420 for wetland delineation and rating standards. Pursuant to FWRC 19.145.430, any development or improvement within a wetland will require Hearing Examiner approval administered via Process IV Master Land Use application, public hearing, and decision by the City's Hearing Examiner. The applicant will have the burden of designing the development within the wetland to meet the following decisional criteria: a) It will not adversely affect drainage or stormwater retention capabilities; b) It will not lead to unstable earth conditions nor create erosion hazards; c) It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area of the subject property nor to the City as a whole, including the loss of open space; d) It will result in no net loss of wetland area, function or value upon completion of compensatory mitigation; e) The project is in the best interest of the public health, safety or welfare; f) The applicant has demonstrated sufficient scientific expertise and supervisory capability to carry out the project; and g) The applicant is committed to monitoring the project and to making corrections if the project fails to meet projected goals. Any development within the wetland will require Hearing Examiner approval (Process iV) of a mitigation plan encompassing the items listed in FWRC 19.145.140 and FWRC 19.145.430(3-7) (enclosed). Any development within a wetland shall be considered as development on lands covered by water. Acceptable methods to mitigate wetland impacts include creation, re-establishment, rehabilitation, and enhancement of in -kind wetland types within the same drainage basin. Alternative mitigation methods including an approved in -lieu fee program or mitigation bank, and/or advanced migration, are discretionary and may become an option following an operating agreement between the City and mitigation receiving area. Meeting Follow-up: You may choose to work with King County to establish alternative mitigation methods as outlined in FWRC. The contact for King County's Mitigation Reserves Program is listed below; see enclosed handouts. Please consult other government agencies regard ine Federal and S.tatea pprovals for work within wetlands. Stream — A critical area report will be required to determine the Washington Department of Natural Resources water typing and stream buffer on the southeastern corner of the property (FWRC 19.145.260-275). Geologically Hazardous Ai-eas — Geologically Hazardous Areas (GHA), landslide hazard areas, may exist on site. Whenever there is evidence of a critical area located within or in proximity to a nonexempt action, the director may require a critical area report to determine the extent to which such critical area may exist (FWRC 19.145.070). Per FWRC 19.05.070, G definilion, Geologically Hazardous Areas are those areas which because of their susceptibility to erosion, landsliding, seismic or other geological events require specific studies to determine appropriate buffers or property use. Geologically hazardous areas include the following areas: t 7. 101944.00-PC Doc ID 75917 .left Kine June 28 2017 Paae G (1) "Erosion hazard areas" are those areas identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resource Conservation Service as having a moderate to severe or severe to very severe rill and inter -rill erosion hazard due to natural agents such as wind, rain, splash, frost action or strearn flow; those areas containing the following group of soils when they occur on slopes of 15 percent or greater: Alderwood-Kitsap ("AkF"), Alderwood gravelly sandy loarn ("AgD"), Kitsap silt loam ("KpD"), Everett ("EvD"), and Indianola ("InD"); and those areas impacted by shore land and/or stream bank erosion. (2) "Landslide hazard areas" are those areas potentially subject to episodic downslope movement of a mass of soil or rock including, but not limited to, the following areas: a) Any area with a combination of: i. Slopes greater than 15 percent; ii. Permeable sediment, predorninately sand and gravel, overlying relatively impermeable sediment or bedrock, typically silt and clay; and iii. Springs or groundwater seepage. b) Any area that has shown movement during the Holocene epoch, from 10,000 years ago to the present, or that is underlain by mass wastage debris of that epoch. c) Any area potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision, stream bank erosion or undercutting by wave action. d) Any area located in a ravine or on an active alluvial fan, presently or potentially subject to inundation by debris flows or flooding. e) Those areas mapped as Class U (unstable), UOS (unstable old slides), and URS (unstable recent slides) by the Department of Ecology's Coastal Zone Atlas. f) Areas designated as quaternary slumps, earthflows, mudflows, lahars, or landslides on maps published by the U.S. Geological Survey or Washington State Department of Natural Resources. a) Slopes having gradients greater than 80 percent subject to rockfall during seismic shaking. h) Any area with a slope of 40 percent or steeper and with a vertical relief of 10 or more feet except areas composed of consolidated rock. A slope is delineated by establishing its toe and top and is measured by averaging the inclination over at least 10 feet of vertical relief. The Community Development Director may permit development activities on or within 50 feet of a geologically hazardous area if the development will not be at risk of darnage due to the geologic hazard and will not lead to or create any increased slide, seismic or erosion hazard. Pursuant to FWRC 19.145.250, a geotechnical report prepared by a geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist licensed with the state is required in addition to the critical areas report for wetlands and the strearn. The report may be reviewed by the city's consultant at the discretion of staff. The report must describe how each of the proposed developments will impact or be impacted by the following on the property and nearby properties: i. Slope stability, landslide hazard, and sloughing; ii. Seismic hazards; iii. Groundwater; iv. Seeps, springs and other surface waters; and V. Existing vegetation. Other requirements — • Setbacks: Unless otherwise approved, structures shall be set back a distance of five feet trorn the edges of a critical area buffer. 17-10194-600TC Dot ID 75017 Jeff King June 28. 2017 I'aae 7 Notice on title: The owner of any property containing critical areas or buffers on which a development proposal is submitted or any property on which mitigation is established as a result of development, except a public right-of-way or the site of a permanent public facility, shall file a notice approved by the city with the King County recorder's office. The required contents and form of the notice shall be determined by the director. The notice shall inform the public of the presence of critical areas, buffers or mitigation sites on the property, and that limitations on actions in or affecting such critical areas or buffers may exist. The notice shall run with the land. Sicpgnage: Development proposals approved by the city shall require that the boundary between a critical area buffer and contiguous land shall be identified with permanent signs. Permanent signs shall be a city -approved type designed for high durability. Signs must be posted at an interval of one per lot or every 150 feet, whichever is less, and must be maintained by the property owner or homeowners' association in perpetuity. The wording, number and placement of the signs may be modified by the director based on specific site conditions. + Critical Area Fencing: Permanent fencing shall be required at the outer edge of the critical area buffers to protect the values and function of the wetland (FWRC 19.145.180(d)). • Construction Re uirements: The city may require other construction techniques, conditions, and restrictions on development in order to minimize adverse impacts on critical areas. + Timm : The city may limit development activities that involve any clearing and grading to specific months of the year and to a maximum number of continuous days or hours in order to minimize adverse impacts. 7. Tacoma Smelter Plume — The subject property is not located on the Tacoma Smelter Plume. 8. Rockeries and Retaining Walls— When incorporating rockeries and retaining walls into site design, the applicant shall work with the site topography in order to minimize the need for rockeries and retaining walls. When rockeries and/or retaining walls are utilized, the following standards shall apply: For single-family residential lots, rockeries and retaining walls shall be: (a) A maximum of six feet in height as measured fi-om finished grade at base of wall to top of wall. (b) Composed of brick, rockery, textured or patterned concrete, or other masonry product that complements the proposed building and site development. Other materials may be used with the approval of the community development services and public works directors. (c) There shall be a minimum setback of one foot for every foot in rockery or retaining wall height between the rear of a residential building and any rockery or retaining wall; provided, that a usable space equal to the rear yard setback must always be maintained. Rockeries and retaining walls greater than 4 feet and a surcharge require building permits; rockeries and retaining walls with a surcharge and under 4 feet also require building permits. 9. Key Development Regulations —All site improvements must comply with the applicable FWRC development regulations. The following general regulations apply to this proposal. ta-loleaa.oCO'C' Do in 7S°717 .lel'l' Kinc, June 28. 2017 Page 8 Zone RS 15.0 Required Yards, 20 ft., 5 ft., 5 ft. (measured from recorded easements) Front, Side, Rear Driveways 20 ft. max. Vehicles may not be parked in the required side yard. Height of 30 ft. Above Average Building Elevation Structure Parking 2 spaces Maxinnnn Lot 50% Coverage Special Regulations and Notes: RS Zone • Side yard setback for a corner lot for that portion of the lot not adjacent to the primary vehicular access is 10 ft., otherwise five ft. 10. Application Fees — Please contact the Permit Center at 253-835-2607 or permit.centerncityotfederalway.com for the following review fees applicable for your project: • Critical Area Report and Mitigation Plan Peer Review (TBD) • Process IV Hearing Examiner Decision • SEPA w/ project (if City is Lead Agency) • Notice board and • Concurrency This list does not include building permit, engineering review, inspection, traffic impact, and other fees that may be applicable prior, concurrent, or following building construction. PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION (Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, kevin.petersongeityoffederalway.com) Land Use Issues — Stormwater Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Typically, a single-family project would apply stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP's), as provided in Appendix C of the KCSWDM, and would normally be reviewed Linder the Building Permit. However, given the potential for wetlands and/or a stream on this site, the applicant should address how stormwater runoff will be managed as part of any Land Use review process. Additionally, the applicant is advised a civil engineer may be required to design the stormwater management techniques for the site, due to any wetlands or stream that may have their hydrology affected by any construction within, or adjacent to, those critical areas. 17-101944-00-PC I Doc ID 75917 Jeff King June 28.2017 Page 9 PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION (Erik Preston, PE, 253-835-2744, erik-. i-estonrcitvoffe(leralw,iv.com) Transportation Concurrency Analysis (FWRC 19.90) I. Based on the submitted materials for 1 single-family residence, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation - 8"' Edition, land use code 210 (Single -Family, Detached Housing), the proposed project is estimated to generate approximately 1 new weekday PM peak hourtrip. Alternatively, the applicant may submit a site specific trip generation study for the proposed development. 2. A concurrency pen -nit is required for this development project. The PW Traffic Division will perform concurrency analysis to detennine if adequate roadway capacity exists during the weekday PM peak period to accommodate the proposed development. Please note that supplernental transportation analysis and concurrency mitigation may be required if the proposed project creates an impact not anticipated in the six -year Transportation improvement Plan (TIP). The estimated fee for the concurrency permit application is S1,620.00 (1 - 10 Trips). This fee is an estimate and based on the materials submitted for the preapplication meeting. The concurrency application fee must be paid in full at the time the concurrency permit application is submitted with land use application. The fee may change based on the new weekday PM peak hour trips as identified in the concurrency trip generation. The applicant has the option of having an independent traffic engineer prepare the concurrency analysis consistent with City procedures; however, the fee remains the same. Transportation Impact Fees (TIF) (FWRC 19.91) Based on the submitted materials for 1 single family horne, the estimated total traffic impact fee is S3,99I.39. The actual fee will be assessed and collected frorn the applicant when the building permit is issued, using the fee schedule then in effect (FWRC 19.100.070 3(c)). At any time prior to building permit issuance, the applicant may request to defer to final building inspection the payment of a transportation impact fee for a single-family residential dwelling unit (FWRC 19.100.075). If this option is selected, a covenants prepared by the city to enforce payment of the deferred fees will be recorded at the applicant's expense. Refer- to defer- payment of impact fee code for process. Street Frontage Improvements (FWRC 19.135) I. The applicant/owner would be expected to construct street improvernents consistent with the planned roadway cross -sections as shown in Map III-4 in Chapter III of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) shown as Table I11-10 (FWRC 19.135.040). Based on the materials submitted, staff conducted a limited analysis to determine the required street improvements. The applicant would be expected to construct improvements on the following streets to the City's planned roadway cross -sections: ■ SR-99 is a Principal Arterial planned as a Type "E" street, consisting of a 64-foot street with curb and gutter, 6-foot planter strips with street trees, 8-foot sidewalks, and street lights in a 98-foot right-of-way (ROW). Assuming a symmetrical cross section, half -street improvements are required as measured from the street centerline OR far side edge of travel way with no ROW dedication. 17-1010aa-00-PC Doc ID 75917 Jeff King- .tune 28 2017 Pace 10 The applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director to modify, defer, or waive the required street improvements (FWRC 19.135.070). Information about right-of-way modification requests is available through the Public Works Development Services Division. These modification requests have a nominal review fee currently at $290 ($270.00 plus $20 recording fee). Staff may be supportive of such a modification. 3. Tapers and transitions beyond the project frontage may be required as deemed necessary for safety purposes, taper rate shall be WS^2/60 or as directed by the Public Works Director. Access Management (FWRC 19.135) 1. Access management standards are based on roadway safety and capacity requirements. FWRC 19.135.280 provides access standards for streets based on planned roadway cross -sections. Please note that access classifications are per Drawing 3-1A in the Public Works Development Standards. 2. WAC 468-52-040 limits access on state highways to access spacing of 250 feet with only one access per parcel. Pacific Highway S is access class "1" where left access may be permitted every 330 feet and left -out access is only permitted at signalized intersections (FWRC 19.135.280). The proposal does not meet this requirement and should be revised to meet this standard. If relocating the driveway is not feasible, then access restrictions will be required. 3. Please show all neighboring driveways within 250 feet of the proposed driveway(s) on both sides of the street. 4. Because left -turns in and out Of tile proposed access location would interfere with the storage of the southbound left -turn lane serving the cemetery (and thus the 95"' percentile queue length), the proposed driveway will be restricted to right -in and right -out movements only. A Channelization Plan approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) will be required to limit access by the addition of curbing in the median. Design Criteria (FWRC 18.55) In general, all lots shall be accessed by a public street right-of-way (FWRC 18.55.020). In certain cases, lots may be accessed by an ingress/egress and utilities easement or alley subject to the requirements established in the City of Federal Way public works development standards. Residential lots should not have access onto arterial streets. Misc. Safety related Comments The applicant must submit a Vehicle Turning Diagram to the Public Works Traffic Division. This diagram will show how the appropriate design vehicle (such as: Moving Van or Garbage Truck) can enter, maneuver, and leave the site in a forward -facing manner without encroaching onto opposing traffic lanes or mounting a curb. As such, a sufficient hammerhead (or similar) turnaround will be required outside of the right-of-way so vehicles can enter SR 99 driving forward. Vehicles will not be permitted to back onto SR 99. SOUTH KING FiRE AND RESCUE (Chris Callan, 253-946-7242, chris.e:ihan c saiithkingfire.ar ) The required fire flow for this project is 1500 gallons per minute. A Certificate of Water Availability shall be provided indicating the fire flow available at the site. A hydraulic fire flow model shall be requested from the water district. 17-101944-00-1T Doc ID. 75917 Jeff Kind June 28. 2017 Page 11 Fire Sprinkler System: An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for this project due to the difficult access to the closest fire hydrant. If this building is constructed under the IBC, an NFPA 13 system will be required. The system demand pressure (to the source) required in a hydraul ically designed automatic fire sprinkler system shall be at least 10 percent less than the correlative water supply curve pressure. LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT (Brian Asbury, 253-946-5407, BAsbury@lakehaven.org) Water • A Certificate of Water Availability issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one (1) year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed, allow 1-2 work days to issue for typical. Current/2017 cost for a Certificate of Water Availability is $90.00. • The site does not have an existing or previous water service connection. • A water service connection application submitted separately to Lakehaven is required for each new service connection to the water distribution system, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current `Fees and Charges Resolution'. • Service pressure(s) greater than 80 psi indicated, Pressure Reducing Valve(s) indicated, contact local building official for requirements &/or additional information. .■ Based on the proposal submitted, preliminary estimated Lakehaven water service connection fees/charges/deposits (2017 schedule) will be as follows. Actual connection charges will be determined upon submittal of service connection application(s) to Lakehaven. Connection charges are separate from any DE fees/charges/deposits & are due at the time of application for service. All Lakehaven fees, charges and deposits are typically reviewed & adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to change without notice. • Water Service/Meter Installation, 1'/2" preliminary size estimate: $5,200.00 deposit. Actual size TBD by Lakehaven based on the higher demand of the UPC plumbing fixture count & the required fire - protection system needs. NOTE: This would be a non -typical water service connection installation across a major highway, final cost for service installation is anticipated to be more than the deposit amount, post -installation invoice to applicant should be anticipated. • Capital Facilities Charge(s)-Water (one (1) Equivalent Residential Units (ERU)): $3,476.00. • ROW Permit Fee (City of Federal Way) _ $700.00. Sewer • A Certificate of Sewer Availability issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any land use and/or building permit applications (check with land use agency for requirement). Certificate is valid for one (1) year from date of issuance. If Certificate is needed, allow 1-2 work days to issue for typical. Current/2017 cost for a Certificate of Sewer Availability is $90.00. • The site does not have an existing or previous sewer service connection. ■ Currently, there are no Lakehaven sewer system facilities accessible for this parcel. The nearest existing sewer system facilities intended to ultimately serve this property/area are currently about 1.2 in Iles north of the property along the west side of Pacific Hwy S. There are no known or anticipated plans for the future development/extension of these water system facilities at this time. General • All Lakehaven Development Engineering related application forms, and associated standards information, can be accessed at Lakehaven's Development Engineering web pages htt:/1.vwxv.lakeliaveii.orJ204/Devela iiieiit-Ejigineerins-,). 17-101944-00-PC Doc ID'75917 .left King June 28. 2017 Page 12 All comments herein are valid for one (1) year and are based on the proposal(s) submitted and Lakehaven's current regulations and policies. Any change to either the development proposal(s) or Lakehaven's regulations and policies may affect the above comments accordingly. CLOSING This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication meeting and is intended to assist you in preparing plans and materials for formal application. We hope you found the comments useful to your project. We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the City's review of the formal application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter does not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per FWRC 19.40.070 (4). As you know, this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the fill review that will follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication materials submitted. Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify information regarding development requirements outlined above. In addition to this preapplication letter, please examine the complete FWRC and other relevant codes carefully. Requirements that are found in the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project. If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative noted above. Any general questions can be directed towards me at 253-835-2644 or leila.willoughby-oakes@cityoffederalway.com. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Leila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner enc: Master Land Use Application Process III/IV Submittal Requirements Environmental Checklist Mailing Envelopes Class IV -General Forest Practices Application Concurrency Application Lakehaven Enclosures c: Chris Marchand, 24408 118`h Ct. E.- Kent. WA 98030; Emailed: t'hriy_�rfars hand�r ctt.ernn (Owner) Kevin Peterson. Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston- Senior Traffic Engineer Peter Lawrence. Plans Examiner Brian Asbury. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan. South King Fire & Rescue 17-101944-00-1T Doc ID 75017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 2, 2017 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Planning FOR DRC MTG. ON: May 11, 2017- Internal May 18, 2017- with applicant ..................................................... FILE NUMBER(s): 17-101944-00-PC RELATED FILE NOS.: No prior permits in Amanda PROJECT NAME: MARCHAND BUILDING/ SINGLE FAMILY PROJECT ADDRESS: *NO SITE ADDRESS* XXXX Pac. Hwy. S.; APN: 218820-4490 ZONING DISTRICT: RS 15.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a single family residence with possible associated business use (home occupation) on parcel containing stream & wetlands. Subject property located on the on the City of Milton boundary (unopened right-of-way, 2nd Street- forested). Proposed use is a single professional office such as an accountant or attorney. Commercial buildings not permitted in RS15.0. Home Occ. only. LAND USE PERMITS: Use Process(Reasonable Use, Critical Area/ Mitigation) PROJECT CONTACT: Jeff King PO Box 331 Milton, WA 206-550-8998 Jdkingconst.@hotmail.com Chris Marchand(Owner) 24408 118th Ct. E. Kent WA 98030 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Critical Area Map Site Plan S-T-R Map Aerial Map K, .$ kz tit 4r NX4 iv A CITY Of Federal Way May 18, 2017 11:00 a.m. Pre -application Conference Sign in Sheet COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Project Name: Marchand Building Critical Areas Address:Parlce: 218 820-4490 File Number: 17-101944-00-PC City Hall los Room NAME DEPARTMENT / DIVISION TELEPHONE NUMBER Leila Willoughby -Oakes, Planning/Community 253-835-2644 Associate Planner Development Leila.Willough 1. Oakes ci offederalwa .com •3 —1"%3S 2. -Z744- 3. 4X13','1.,J 4. r-kA LC 'Z 4 5. dge k\C� GL Z5 3 - 9'SF(.- 5 4o 'SRrRt-) AS33k3 6. ley SEwc2 :015z-CZ% %45.0049C Se -rt+ C�•-� C,— n 2E t Zr g 'W (- 72--3 I S N A �`'�e Glnr; L��� or 7. S.Cu�can z�3 7-u3S 4 8. 41 i c� a pu6ta-0C1'vfIDE.A- (Ww"L j 'J25 i -Ae"i004e �ri%z. P►�s�4r.Gci�y _ 10. 11. 12. 0%7 AAA-4 9 A s O N O r r °° x ? co co rQ w 1 cn 9 P NJ J cm co O J� r zz j O CS O Q p N 'm CO = N W m co 0 0 G CD a o m m y O N O j O O v co N C.fl C]'I cm r �— cm y� coCSI cn CO CO [N co > NJO 00 O O O C71 O O Vi A O O Z O ��yy O v n7 C 6] S1 !!ll����IIII f.57 (NOT OPEN) <rrr�ts .T} J NOT OPEN) NJ O6 CO co N Na A 6; CA L71 O ? C cocnN O cn O U O j O O q O 41 W CO O �� O A .w O N N O ? Lakehaven � � WATER SEWER DISTRIC-: � �r^ County U���� ��U U�� �� ��� �~' � ./ 0090 0, el "Y 0060, '�-� / ` -' 9052 070 1.1,9 (0) Zj()) (5 7 �O / / /. 0020 / 90 -------arz+--~ -- r` --- 90b2 9057 �W34 bA� f / 002'- / ' � E � ' 9044 � uzo R-A / ! ' 04 L75 70 . ' L.. jC�' � ��] Lsffl2]- ,0036 IT ��� � ' ' 43 uz/" West Hylebos � /�»� / | IA/,m 4- 1 = r-i fir, 3 5 2n St +- Park 13 01- 54 0020 �0�01pao� 02 91,27 90911, 114 2- 0. The information included on this map has been compiled by King County slaff from a variety of sources and is subjectmchange without notice. King County Dmte:4C20/2)17 makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This documentis not intended for use as a survey product. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map isprohibited except »ywritten permission mKing County. m[` ` 0 00 .10 ��� ���U King County CITY OF � Federal Way May 3.201 7 Jeff King PO Box 331 Milton, WA 98354 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Er -nailed: iefll:ing, lanJandvv-ildlife.com RE: )File #17-101944-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE Marchand Critical Area SFR/Home Occupation, *No Site Address,' Federal Way (Parcel: 218820-4490) Dear, Mr. King: The Community Development Department is in receipt of you►- preapplication conference request. The application has been routed to members of the Development Revieiv Cosrmittee and the meeting has been scheduled as follows: 11:00 a.m. — Thursday, May 18, 2017 Hylebos Conference Room Federal Way City Hall, 2" d Floor 33325 8"' AVCnL:C South Federal Way, W'Et 98003 We look forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else you Would like to attend the meeting as this will be the only notice sent by the department. If you have any questions regarding the meeting, please contact me atlei la.Nviilousi-bby-oakesCiucityoftederalwav__cn)ii or 253-835- 2644. Sincerely eila Willoughby -Oakes Associate Planner C.I. Chris Marchand; Emailed:yhris.march Lnd'iNftx4%n (Owner) 0 N _ N N O M cp zLci Lh 0 O N N 17 M 0 cm N LLj N M CDO pOp Cl)C7 00 „�„ N 00 [y _ //� 00 ` v/ N CO N Y nLDI.... �Na Z w Lo ~ OO E lf] OS m,r, vM o v0 cN �, c0 v d' < O W c 00 0 R N 00 N 1 000 ' _ N N O CR LD OO Lo LO LO 00 LO v 00 p O O N N N /�/� N 00 co O rI N 00 N N Co c 0 *+ No O cn M :ji ['y f1 N M N O N O O +� N _ CO I ui N � fr N N M O Lo N O 00 7 CO CO y N ' I C o o0 M cc —i O J m J N N N O v cn V O 61- rcl f, 0 CITY OF RECEIVED MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION p❑ y DEPARTMENT OF C:OiMMUNM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APR 2 f ���� � V. (j t�'��t��e•,.•� 33325 8`h Avenue South -L Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Fe d e ra i wad CriY OF FEDERAL � `� -A � `� c 253-8 www. it Fax 253-835-2609 K°w�v.cit � fFederalwa .com �1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �� �o � tV+�-t�• U LLV APPLICATION NO(S) / 7 V V Project Name &I Property Address/Location 3 7 Parcel Number(s) 2 / Project Description ME" f� r vo d .6. rJ i �ll�I dlG ` LAO L^' O D ss i b 1 e b u. s VLf_ ss u 9-e . E c k ir-o PLEASE PRINT B%+ S r 4e— + 'All 5 '/ /W 01 � W e�4 k4(5- Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information �.� r Zo�� v Designation 5 FGf Comprehensive Plan Designation ­_� Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: C1el/ Address: 0 13 eqY -3 3 /q City/State: 7 1���k wA G 93s y Phone: Email: JF I!' �� �rl S- /. ©l� o�✓t't"Y % I GB M Signature: 1/ Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: Address: City/State: Zip: �/� [ 4[J c?03 Phone: Fax: r �] Email: f 4 f 4..rit �u f% ti �DYU Signature: 3ulletin #003 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application milixi "I IN CITY OF40'::t�ftga� F Federal Way RECEIVE® APR 2 7 2017 UTY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.city.affederalway.com APPLICATION NO(S) 17 - f ! l I � ! i - /�c Date Project Name _ 1!" 61�_ i C, keir" A Property Address/Location 3 % r k.�� Parcel Number(i) '2' 5F<;7 �7 6, jq "! Project Description L� Fr io oss b 1e b^,t ss tt z . PLEASE PRINT . �+ S T� 5 9 /mac o,S- Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information X'S i Zoning Designation M4_1d Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type G. Applicant Name: C/c! // /�, Address: p� eq V -3 3 / City/State- Zip:7 /L4�/�! i/VA Phone:DSs� ' 9"7 J' Email: l� ! �� �`! S- / ®G� I'do�t� �Fi f�l A Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State- Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: Address: Zip-. Zip- /�� � V "� � U Phone: Fax: _]] Email: ?,A �t�t�•�� C�� �i ��� ���' Signature: Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application _ r r, r 6 1� Sth St.Ct NE --NN,= 1 i ■ PC r7IIIIM Gethsemmae comic Cernefimy w q KID] I .- --- �Wlia �n ts !,A. Vi Fu R 25 = �Z4-- y t4 (v 40 3: r k", IL qw lu .E,i,IGAl 'fl? R A >o tu ILI a -A LL] 0 z lu I'm 1 SIDE VIEW 8A6 -TOP NEW I' 7CT BARRIER DETAIL 19••I0' b'-2' B'' • 4'-i0' 12'-9' T'•5' 6'3}• 6'-•J3' 6111�,!Av XO OF CANTILEVERED-- __--- FF��95 II B' CLG. CLOS. e C� l 1. l I i♦ - KI T O Is0 �7i EP EP. — O I I _ -- Illy 8' OLG- _ J 8p & ca-r- Y �IW. ,c� �E.7 � EAT'G BAR If •?- II w CFC '.'�L�. IlyyPyl• 5.�. •�T• 3._y 4•, g• B•_y I ® 110v 4 O B' CLG. m F� TREAT ROOM VAULTED — — — N7, YAIgJ LLB _ _ _ _ _ 6 ' IIOv � Q B 5D. METAL FIREPLACE U aj INSTALL PER MF. Bf•'EGes• P000VIDE 6' �q [1 ENTRY EF LIN AIR VAULTEDr M IM Sa K 04fiSVE 9 3 W D.V. A� —1 ® B' GLG. - D BP C I I LY' J r ® SELF x oSOL D row S�TF�RATED 2 B ORCCLL vlJ9-O :g FRN.GIFDJAT. QA9 � NO i7lk—i C7$:Yi.aB HO7 WATER T'I _ M GPI . fETUERG7 FAr-TOR®.9U _— DSL.-TS THF�FOH CLG OR �- tll CCFRTCN TO FIOINE. iPl 28 GdaE STE61_ 6X6 PT ROB a bARA6E USE 1/I' TTPE 'X' CALE ON ALL WARM AND STRUCTURAL WALLS. lU LATER 5/8' TTPE 'X' ON CEILINGS. WRAP ALL EXPOSED POSTS AND BEAMS IN 1/2' TYPE 'X' GWB iEl®x T/� P1U. DOGR !6'-7 RO. 5'-0• 20'-ID• ✓6' 40'•am' MAIN FLOOR PLAN MAIN FLOOR: 1405 50. PT. GARAGE: 400 50. PT. I t I ENE L ALL 2. VENT 3. VENT TooI 4. % MECF 5. ALL MINIM 6. SHAAL TO M. LAVA ID GU T. ALL l BE 5, B. ALL < FLOG S. 5MOK R314_ SLEE' SLEE' THE E THE L HABI INSTA OR 5 WILL INDIV 1 I0. p$Q] R315 AN AI BE IN EACI- OF TF IL M5UL MINIM 12. ALL I SPAC R-B F B. EXHA WALK OUTSI 14. GAS WHER NOTC LOCI OR FI PIPE THAT FRAM THAN PIPIN BOTT SHIEL MEME AB0% LESS MEME 15. ATTIC 5HAL A LE' SURR IS. WHOL ACCE THAT OPEF I1. DRYf DUCT ORYE ARE DUCT THE T THE E PER I. WHEF WITHII EQUIN SHAL OR T. LOCI 2. INSTA OFM WHEF INSTA OPET 100 E PRO1 MAKE APPF 5mINTEG INTEG FORT 150T: FIX IB _AWEGR�TRA ER p! Irl F'EFC iP+G COPYRIGHT 2018 Luldmark Design Inc. ALL RldN IMBERN k.At' NO' IS I 7V# INTERIOR FINISH: SHEETROCK, CARPET AND VINYL COLORS BEIGE & OFF WHITE EXTERIOR FINISH: HARDIE LAP WITH WHITE WOOD ACCENTS, COMPOSITION ROOF COLORS CHARCOAL GRAY AND WHITE No existing use —vacant parcel. Proposed use is a single professional office such as accountant or attorney. Other possible proposed uses would be home based business or single family dwelling. F� x,�- 20 �� 5, 97J 4; F so IiL, vom f blv ,� KY \-A VU - Ab c/-- cg 117,46 k(4 S�- QL