Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
12-101543
CITY OF CITY HALL Ak Federal Way Feder 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com May 24, 2012 Sunny Ausink PTS 111 South Jackson Street, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: File #12-101543-00-UP; PROCESS III —PROJECT APPROVAL AT&T Mobility - SS65 Dumas Bay, 4451 SW 313`h Street, Federal Way Dear Ms. Ausink: The Community and Economic Development Department has completed administrative land use review of the proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) improvements located on public right-of-way on the north side of SW Dash Point Road east of the intersection of 47'' Avenue SW and on the adjacent parcel at 4451 SW 313`h Street. The applicant proposes to add two panel antennas and ancillary ground equipment to the existing facility. The Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application submitted April 6, 2012, is hereby approved based on the enclosed findings of fact, incorporated into this decision in full, and the following conclusions based on those facts: 1. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; 2. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC); 3. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; 4. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal; 5. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration; and 6. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated. The remainder of this letter outlines the land use review process required for this particular site improvement; summarizes the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process; and provides other procedural information. This land use decision does not authorize initiation of construction activities. SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.030(3), improvements and/or additions to an existing developed site that are not exempt from SEPA shall be processed under Use Process III. The Director of Community and Economic Development will make the initial land use decision based on written comments and information gathered during site plan review. Any appeals of the decision will be decided by the Hearing Examiner after a public hearing. SEPA PROCESS The City of Federal Way issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on May 9, 2012, pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11-350. Following review of the environmental checklist, the city 131s. Ausink May 24, 2012 Page 2 determined the proposal would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement would not be required, and no SEPA based mitigation was necessary. RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT & ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIRED This Process III land use decision does not constitute a right-of-way permit or electrical permit. The applicant shall obtain permits from the city prior to construction. Please contact the Permit Center at 253- 835-2607 for information regarding permit applications and requirements. REQUESTS FOR CHANGE OF VALUATION Any affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes, not withstanding any program of revaluation. APPROVAL DURATION Unless modified or appealed, the Process III decision is valid for five years from the date of issuance of the decision. Time extensions to the decision may be requested prior to the lapse of approval following the provisions listed in FWRC 19.15.110. APPEALS The effective date of issuance is three calendar days following the date of this letter, or May 27, 2012. Pursuant to FWRC 19.65.120, this land use decision may be appealed by any person who submitted written comments or any person who has specifically requested a copy of the decision. Any appeal must be in the form of a letter delivered to the Community and Economic Development Department with the established fee and within 14 days after the effective date of issuance of this decision, or June 10, 2012. The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the factual findings and conclusion of the Director disputed by the person filing the appeal. The Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hear any appeals of the Process III decision. CLOSING This land use decision does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, at 253- 835-2638 or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Isaac Conlen Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director enc: Exhibit `A' Statement of Findings and Conclusions Approved Plan Set c: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner 12-101543 Doc. I.D. 61162 CITY OF Federal Way Exhibit A FILE Statement of Findings and Conclusions Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65 `Process III Project Approval' AT&T Mobility — SS65 Dumas Bay - File 12-101543-UP The Planning Division hereby presents the following analysis to the Director of Community and Economic Development pursuant to content requirements of the Process III written decision as set forth in FWRC 19.65.100(4). I. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Proposal — The project applicant proposes to install two new Long Term Evolution (LTE) antennas to an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility located on top of a Puget Sound Energy utility pole. Ancillary ground equipment will be added to the existing equipment cabinet enclosure. 2. Site — Antennas will be installed on public right-of-way on the north side of SW Dash Point Road east of the intersection of 47'h Avenue SW. Ground equipment installation is proposed on the adjacent parcel at 4451 SW 313th Street, Federal Way, WA 98023. The parcel is currently developed with a single-family residence. 3. Exempt Activity — Applicant proposes to remove one existing cabinet from the equipment enclosure and add two stacked cabinets with several other equipment additions. Proposed upgrades will occur within enclosure and no material expansions or changes to the architectural design of the enclosure are proposed. Therefore, these changes are exempt from PWSF standards set forth in FWRC Chapter 19.255 and are permitted outright with no further regulatory action required pursuant to FWRC 19.255.010(3)(g). 4. Prioritized Locations — Applicant proposes PWSF improvements in "appropriate public rights - of -way" or the fifth prioritized location set forth in FWRC 19.255.010(4). Higher prioritized locations were not feasible as this proposal is an upgrade to an existing facility. By choosing a higher priority location, redundant facilities would be created and possibly cause negative effects to the overall network. Staff finds the applicant has met the burden to utilize the fifth prioritized location. 5. Facility — The existing and proposed facility exceed microcell and minor facility thresholds defined in FWRC 19.05.130. Facilities exceeding such thresholds may be permitted if: (1) adverse visual impacts are not created; (2) equipment cabinets meet adopted development standards; and (3) the number of antennas and their size are appropriate for the location. All three criteria have been met as further analyzed in this document's findings. 6. Height — Applicant proposes to mount existing and new antennas on a replacement mounting extension near the top of the existing utility pole. This extension will cause the existing height of 52 feet to increase to 61.5 feet. The net height increase of 9.5 feet is within the allowable once - per -year 15-foot maximum increase pursuant to FWRC 19.255.020(1)(c). 7. Aesthetics — PWSF facility will be mounted parallel and as an extension to the existing utility pole. The applicant proposes to paint the antennas to match the color of the pole. Staff finds these measures appropriately mitigate visual impacts of the facility, cause no adverse cumulative effects, and meet aesthetic standards set forth in FWRC 19.255.020(1)(d). 8. Antenna Size — Proposed LTE panel antennas are eight feet in height and are needed to add 4g technology to the existing network. Existing antennas will remain for 3g data traffic. Antenna size meets eight -foot maximum requirement set forth in FWRC 19.255.020(1)(e). H. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Comprehensive Plan & Zoning — The site is within single-family high density residential (RS 9.6) comprehensive plan and zoning designations. PWSFs are a permitted use in RS zones pursuant to FWRC 19.200.190. 2. Site Plan Review Process —Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.030(3), improvements and/or additions to an existing developed site that are not exempt from SEPA shall be processed under Use Process III as set forth in FWRC Chapter 19.65. 3. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) — The proposed improvements are not categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 197-11- 800(25)(a)(ii) as the facility is within a residential zone. Following review of the environmental checklist, the Responsible Official determined the proposal would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement would not be required. The department issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on May 9, 2012. The appeal period for the DNS expired May 23, 2012. No appeals were filed with the Federal Way City Clerk. 4. Public Notice & Comment — Pursuant to the city's environmental policy codified in FWRC 14.15.120, the department utilized the Optional DNS process and issued a combined Notice of Application and anticipated DNS, which was distributed and published in the Federal Way Mirror on the date of issuance. Distribution of the notice included one notice board posted onsite adjacent to the existing facility, City Hall, the two King County Libraries within the city limits, and mailed notices to property owners within 300 feet of the site. The department did not receive written comments regarding the Process III Master Land Use application or the environmental threshold determination during the comment period. 5. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan — The applicant's proposal is consistent with the following goals and policies: LUG3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single-family neighborhoods. LUP14 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single-family neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations. PUG1 Work with private utility companies to allow them to provide full and timely service that meets the needs of the City's residents and businesses, both present and future. Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 2 AT&T Mobility — SS65 Dumas Bay - File 12-101543-UP/Doc. i D 61059 PUG2 Work with private utility companies to allow them to provide service in a way that balances cost-effectiveness with environmental protection, aesthetic impact, public safety, and public health. PUG3 Process permits for private utility facilities in an efficient and timely manner, in accordance with franchise agreements, development regulations, the FWCP, and adopted codes. PUP17 The City should require that site -specific utility facilities such as antennas and substations be reasonably and appropriately sited and screened to mitigate adverse aesthetic impacts. 6. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Federal Way Revised Code — The Process III application was reviewed and determined to be consistent under FWRC Title 19 — Zoning and Development Code. 7. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare —The proposal will provide updated technology to the network. No adverse impacts to adjacent parcels are anticipated as a result of the proposal. The Process III request has been reviewed under SEPA; the FWCP; and all applicable provisions of FWRC. 8. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal — No significant adverse transportation impacts were identified by the city. This is an "unstaffed" facility with non -daily trips associated with the maintenance of the facility. Puget Sound Energy has not indicated there would be an adverse increase to electrical demand. 9. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration — Access from adjacent SW Dash Point Road is the nearest and least obtrusive to neighboring residences. 10. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated — This "unstaffed" facility requires no traffic mitigation as it will not generate regular trips to or from the site. These findings shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner Statement of Findings and Conclusions AT&T Mobility — SS65 Dumas Bay - Date: May 24, 2012 Page 3 File 12-101543-UP/D«. LD 61059 41k CITY Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.ci tvof f ed a ra Iwo y. c o m DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice .401991111C Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was Z�moiled ❑ faxed Jae -mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on M 2012. Project Name [-C7 °J, File Number(s) )D_ INsyy Signature 7:�Date 5 - � -/.) K:\CD Administration Res\Declaration of Dislribution.doc/Lash printed 1 /12/2012 2:20:00 PM CITY OF 'A Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) AT&T Mobility SS-65 Dumas Bay File No. 12-101544-00-SE Proposal: Installation of two new Long -Term Evolution (LTE) antennas to an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility located on top of a Puget Sound Energy utility pole. The new antennas will increase the height of the pole from 52 feet to 61.5 feet and will be painted to match the existing wireless facility and utility pole. Ancillary ground equipment will be added to the existing equipment cabinet enclosure. Proponent: Sunny Ausink, Pacific Telecom Services, 111 S. Jackson Street, #200, Seattle, WA 98104 Location: Public right-of-way on the north side of SW Dash Point Road east of the intersection of 47t' Avenue SW. Ground equipment installation on adjacent parcel 4451 SW 313`h Street, Federal Way, WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.2 1 C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. No written comments were received in response to the 14 day comment period that ended May 7, 2012. There is no further comment period on the DNS. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk, no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 23, 2012, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Address: 33325 8'h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Issued: May 9 2012 Signature: Doc- LD. 61060 Tamara Fix From: Tamara Fix Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 8:57 AM To: 'ECY RE SEPA UNIT' Cc: Gordon Goodsell; 'basbury@lakehaven.org'; Chris Ingham Subject: AT&T Mobility Dumas Bay DNS Attachments: AT&T Dumas DNS.pdf Attached is the DNS for AT&T Dumas Bay. This is being issued on May 9, 2012, and the Associate Planner for the project is Matt Herrera, 253-835-2638, matthew.herrera@cityoffederalway.co_m. DNS to the Following Agencies DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98002 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1 ST AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Doc. I.D. CITY OF A Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) AT&T Mobility SS-65 Dumas Bay File No.12-101544-00-SE L Proposal: Installation of two new Long -Term Evolution (LTE) antennas to an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility located on top of a Puget Sound Energy utility pole. The new antennas will increase the height of the pole from 52 feet to 61.5 feet and will be painted to match the existing wireless facility and utility pole. Ancillary ground equipment will be added to the existing equipment cabinet enclosure. Proponent: Sunny Ausink, Pacific Telecom Services, 111 S. Jackson Street, #200, Seattle, WA 98104 Location: Public right-of-way on the north side of SW Dash Point Road east of the intersection of 47ffi Avenue SW. Ground equipment installation on adjacent parcel 4451 SW 313th Street, Federal Way, WA 98023 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Federal Way Revised Code, 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. No written comments were received in response to the 14 day comment period that ended May 7 2012. There is no further comment period on the DNS. You may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk, no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 23, 2012, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager for Patrick Doherty, Director of Community and Economic Development Address: 33325 8`' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Issued: May 9, 2012 Signature: Doc I.D. 61060 CITY OF t Federal Way May 9, 2012 Sunny Ausink PTS I I I South Jackson Street, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98104 FILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com RE: File #12-101544-00-SE; ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION AT&T Mobility - SS65 Dumas Bay, 4451 SW 31P Street, Federal Way Dear Ms. Ausink: C— The city and jurisdictional agencies have reviewed the environmental checklist submitted with the AT&T Mobility - SS65 Dumas Bay Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application. It has been determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is enclosed. The Optional DNS Process was used to review this proposal. The 14-day comment period required by SEPA Rules ran concurrently with the public comment period associated with the notice of land use application, which began on April 20, 2012, and ended May 7, 2012. The city did not receive written comments regarding the MLU application or environmental checklist. Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-355, a second comment period is not required upon issuance of the DNS. The enclosed DNS was issued on May 9, 2012. The city will provide a copy of the DNS to the Department of Ecology, agencies with jurisdiction, Puyallup and Muckleshoot tribes, and anyone requesting a copy. All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days following the issuance of the DNS. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period, which ends May 23, 2012. The decision not to require an EIS does not grant the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the city. The environmental record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions will be imposed to reduce identified environmental impacts, as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated city policy. After a final decision has been made on your proposal you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as permitted in RCW 43.21C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. The city is not responsible for publishing the,Notice of Action. Questions regarding the PWSF's environmental review component should be directed to me at 253-835-2638 or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincere , Matt ew Herrera Associate Planner enc: DNS Doc. I.D. 61062 f1TV OF t Federal Way April 20, 2012 Sunny Ausink PTS I I I South Jackson Street, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98104 1FIL CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com RE: FILE #12-101543-00-UP; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION AT&T Mobility - SS65 Dumas Bay, 4451 SW 313`h Street, Federal Way Dear Ms. Ausink: The Community and Economic Development Department is in receipt of your Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application and environmental checklist. The applicant proposes the addition of two LTE panel antennas to an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.15.045, within 28 days of receiving an MLU application, the city shall determine whether all information and documentation required for a complete application has been submitted. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this letter a Notice of Complete Application. The Process III MLU application is deemed complete as of April 17, 2012. This determination of completeness is based on a review of your submittal relative to applicable requirements referenced within FWRC 19.15.040, "Development application submittal requirements_" A 120-day time line for reviewing the environmental checklist and Process III application has started as of this date. The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line will be stopped any time the city requests corrections and/or additional information. You will be informed of the status of the 120-day time line when you are notified in writing that corrections and/or additional information are needed. PUBLIC NOTICE The combined Notice of Application and anticipated DNS has been distributed as follows: (1) at least one notice posted at the subject property; (2) one copy posted at each of the official notification boards; (3) one copy published in the Federal Way Mirror,- and (4) a copy mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. The department also has the responsibility to notify other agencies that may have jurisdiction over your development project or an interest in it. CLOSING If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or matt.lie� cr citvoffederalwq.com. Sincerely, Matthew errera Associate Planner Doc [ D 60936 F ILE CITY OF - --/ Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: AT&T Mobility — Dumas Bay Project Description: Installation of two, new Long Term Evolution (LTE) antennas to an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility located on top of a Puget Sound Energy utility pole. The new antennas will increase the height of the pole from 52 feet to 61.5 feet and will be painted to match the existing wireless facility and utility pole. Ancillary ground equipment will be added to the existing equipment cabinet enclosure. Applicant: Sunny Ausink, Pacific Telecom Services, 111 S. Jackson Street, #200, Seattle, WA 98104 Project Location: Public right-of-way on the north side of SW Dash Point Road east of the intersection of 0h Ave. SW. Ground equipment installation on adjacent parcel 4451 SW 313Ih St., Federal Way, WA 98023. Application Received: April 6, 2012 Determined Complete: April 17, 2012 Notice of Application: April 20, 2012 Comments Due: May 7, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File # 12-101543-UP) and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #12-101544-SE) Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on May 7, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments -identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8b Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 Doe, I.D. 60909 SS65 DUMAS BAY iY270397YGi 18[tl$001QQ !d•Ftl8000��0 ii270391l7' 1lL1U$OQ10:i l8,r05;100Y5 18•fQ900090 1127U:391}d' 1&r0800110 u !$�£OST100f0 I 112/039010 1121030M C ]d•P080i10t75 ' � 112103901) 21*10Q230- �'172113390d1 21157002k''•� 211Fi CIOOGfl:211G5009•r2J r 2}fB�+}CIVIO!1 -21i57002-r0' '\ ���• �2fi65F7u�5Pf-2]�65rlU0'� 1 .f 21157[PD2 bZ 1 2-i MOUGM 1G50049ti.` tAi Rp: a1lsro a �, z7�G,pu1?y0 21}65n01.10 -_ 21 s,700020 f2li5100l90�! 18OtldL1 27Ei65Qf11Qif.. .f� fs r J( FederaliWay _. 2rrs7voodQ x I?? m 21u= Y — S+Yar3T��- � 772703y060 i 7121039063 r, 2115700l70 2115100140- f --- 211G12tz0d0 v 2115510590 2115r1vri]f1 2115720050 S1Ya[ 211„1051sl 2IF5510560 1121039119 i 2l15�'20560 ! ] 2i15720350 2j?55i0f50 .zj1g5lo,�021155J0620 7121039095 (G}201 135r26?r10nH [', 2115510550 Federal ►}yday NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: AT&T Mobility- Dumas Bay Project Description: Installation of two, new Long Term Evolution (LTE) antennas to an existing Per- sonal Wireless Service Facility located on top of a Puget Sound•Energy utility pole. The new antennas will increase the height of the pole from 52 feet to, 61.5 feet and will be painted to match the existing wireless facility and utility pole. Ancillary ground equipment will be added to the existing equipment cabinet enclosure. Applicant: Sunny Ausink, Pacific Telecom Servic- es, 111 S. Jackson Street, #200, Seattle, WA 98104 Project Location: Public right-of-way on the north side of SW Dash Point Road east of the intersec- tion of 47th Ave. SW. Ground equipment installa- tion on adjacent parcel 4451 SW 313th St., Federal Way, WA 98023. Application Received: April 6,2012 Determined Complete: April 17, 2012 Notice of Application: April 20, 2012 - Comments Due: May 7, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other in- formation on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Deter- mination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to .comment on the environmental impacts of the pro- posed project. The proposal may include mitiga- tion measures under applicable codes, and the re- view process may incorporate or"require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specif- ic proposal may be obtained upon request. Agen- cies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to re- view and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File #12-101543-UP) and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #12-101544-SE) Environmental Documents: Environmental Check- list Relevant Environmental Documents Are Avail- able at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Miti- gation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Any person. may submit written comments on the land use applica- tion or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Devel- opment by 5:00 p.m. on May 7, 2012. Only per- sons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or. specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal proce- dures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable signifi- cant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, Associate Plan- ner,253-835-2638 Published in Federal Way Mirror, April 20, 2012 FWM: 1883 31919 151 Ave S, Suite 101 1 Federal, Way, WA 98003 1 253.925.5565 1253.925.5750 (f) Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi- weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way - Community Development Department as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive weeks(s), commencing on the 20th day of April 2012, and ending on the 20th day of April 2012. both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the SUM of $157.18, which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 1 st day of May 2012. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way ,"I 4k CITY OF —� Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederclwcy.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, P\k'2x C-\ �L�(a G\ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or C ,posted to or at each of the attached addresses on -4I 2C% i 2012. Project Name ` �l File Number(s) \2 w Signature Date I2. K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 4/20/2012 4:37:00 PM _Posted Sites: Federal Way City Hall: 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way Library: 34200 1 st Way South Federal Way 320th Library: 848 S. 320th St 2Cs�� Ale P-c� � w K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 4/20/2012 4:37:00 PM Azk CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: AT&T Mobility —Dumas Bay Project Description: Installation of two, new Long Term Evolution (LTE) antennas to an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility located on top of a Puget Sound Energy utility pole. The new antennas will increase the height of the pole from 52 feet to 61.5 feet and will be painted to match the existing wireless facility and utility pole. Ancillary ground equipment will be added to the existing equipment cabinet enclosure. Applicant: Sunny Ausink, Pacific Telecom Services, I I I S. Jackson Street, #200, Seattle, WA 98104 Project Location: Public right-of-way on the north side of SW Dash Point Road east of the intersection of 47t` Ave. SW. Ground equipment installation on adjacent parcel 4451 SW 313t' St., Federal Way, WA 98023. Application Received: April 6, 2012 Determined Complete: April 17, 2012 Notice of Application: April 20, 2012 Comments Due: May 7, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignifrcance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File #12-101543-UP) and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #12-101544-SE) Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on May 7, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignifrcance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8'h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 Doc. I.D. 60909 40k CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION l r, rn � ._ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) r19[ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other _ was b" nailed ❑ faxed 2012. Project Name i7 81 ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on File Number(s) 1 Signature Date C/ 1 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /12/2012 2:20:00 PM k CITY OF �"��� Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: AT&T Mobility — Dumas Bay Project Description: Installation of two, new Long Term Evolution (LTE) antennas to an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility located on top of a Puget Sound Energy utility pole. The new antennas will increase the height of the pole from 52 feet to 61.5 feet and will be painted to match the existing wireless facility and utility pole. Ancillary ground equipment will be added to the existing equipment cabinet enclosure. Applicant: Sunny Ausink, Pacific Telecom Services, 111 S. Jackson Street, #200, Seattle, WA 98104 Project Location: Public right-of-way on the north side of SW Dash Point Road east of the intersection of 47* Ave. SW. Ground equipment installation on adjacent parcel 4451 SW 313'h St., Federal Way, WA 98023. Application Received: April 6, 2012 Determined Complete: April 17, 2012 Notice of Application: April 20, 2012 Comments Due: May 7, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File #12-101543-UP) and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #12-101544-SE) Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on May 7, 2012.Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested :party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8'h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 Doc. I D. 60909 SS65 DUMAS BAY 112l0597761 • 18d0$4dfdd r }3•I080d02fl }8�D80d1Q5 ; !s•ioaiisals f7214341l7 � ; I _ � ie•rdanoa4d ' - : •i940800ild 11P?U309 }8=` :� � .. - _. .f8•fd800�f0 1121039U70 - lJ27039U29 •• _---: •— • � .— -��,.1 ssudn� [ i 21l57d022�'0 ��2f•tG5[1g4G0,2�j6annW¢. �if'sanfji;z 1 »fan r! : ,��: — ?l Aw2i163nsaar�.. 2lifiraQl 1$M!J1id 27 Gi6f1i0o 2113YOOtl$0 - 121IM019D • '•-� '�-- Fecler-alAay 2115'ldODO 211516n2aa: Y'� �~ f j ar $ ! 112}d39n6r! 21lslog 1f0 2115f00150, 21151001J4 , tt ajs3t29drU �� 21l99f05901 2l155}0630 2l15120050 51Ar31 _ Al 21f59f0 711 211391UG60 f1?Yg343!$ 2115i21ti880 i f 2R20390o1i5S1Uf5tl •xif5ri1d5 21155106" 1727039996 (c�2aic }51� 40ntY -� 21/6510550 ;d�a5lS Print Map Page Page 1 of 3 SS65 DUMAS BAY 1B4UBU01UU 1121039116 784a8LnJudu � 1721U39117 iB4UBUU1U5 i8dL1B[3DD?5 1BdUBUDU4U � 112iU3y11B 1B4UBUG1IG � � 18da8DD61U 1121D39U1D 1721039D89 i 1B4UB000BS � _ __�, 7121a3971{ f _ — - 784UHtlDU � � ti. 1127D39Dif 2115FUU23U '�.,�"�iF7a34USJ '. 21751Di�22D .�' 1i-765DDG5U 27165U'3GdU 27165UDU2U� 2115/UU2 TU 4 ' c.` 2Y.7fi5DD0.5U_ 21•i65a�JJ3U, _. 211£+7EH1z1D. .`-�i�sas�ra 2.1355Q00r SW 12TH pt 27551 76n,60 1,.65a0a40 ' 1 C400I10 2:'.65aUU8J 21 65L?Jfl3�J. . -r Federal Way [115lDUUBU ie i �.- 1121039U63 27151•UU11U 21151UU15U � •. _..._._ _ _� 2115720040 2115510540 21,551D630 — 2i1S5;20050 SW 714T1fPL 21155105T01 2115510560 1121039119 211512LI560 �. 2115%2U39ri2,7551U4sU 211gg1LD 211551U62U 1121U39U45 (G)201 jys 2GDUn�f7 ( 211551U55U 0 —9511 Parcel Number 2116500090 Site Address 4451 SW 313TH ST Zip code 98023 Taxpayer GREENER SCOTT E+JEANNINE BALE The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of Kinst County." Parcel Number 1121039010 4700 SW DASH POINT Parcel Number 1121039029 Site Address RD Site Address Zip code 98023 Zip code Taxpayer CCAS PROPERTY & Taxpayer CCAS PROPERTY & CONST CONST Parcel Number 1121039063 Parcel Number 1121039077 Site Address Site Address Zip code Zip code Taxpayer KING COUNTY FIRE Taxpayer CCAS PROPERTY & CONST DIST 39 y+a V—T Parcel Number 1121039087 Parcel Number 2115700160 E APR 0,6 201? "I TY OF FEDERAL WAY http://www5.kingcounty.gov/parcelviewer/Print—Process.asp 4/5M$2 Print Map Page Page 2 of 3 Site Address Site Address 31250 47TH PL SW Zip code Zip code 98023 Taxpayer CCAS PROPERTY & Taxpayer KEMPTON SAMUEL CONST S+CORINNE M Parcel Number 2115700170 Parcel Number 2115700180 Site Address 31244 47TH PL SW Site Address 31236 47TH PL SW Zip code 98023 Zip code 98023 Taxpayer JACKSON JEFFREY Taxpayer PEIRCE FREDERICK L+CAROL A Parcel Number 2115700190 Parcel Number 2115700200 Site Address 31228 47TH PL SW Site Address 31220 47TH PL SW Zip code 98023 Zip code 98023 Taxpayer CONNER JAMES Taxpayer BEACH JEFFREY+CAUDILL MICHE Parcel Number 2115700210 Parcel Number 2115700270 Site Address 4720 SW 312TH PL Site Address Zip code 98023 Zip code Taxpayer AHRENS MICHAEL Taxpayer FEDERAL WAY CITY OF V+AMY M Parcel Number 2116500010 Parcel Number 2116500020 Site Address 31205 44TH AVE SW Site Address 4400 SW 313TH ST Zip code 98023 Zip code 98023 Taxpayer HEGEL TAMARA & Taxpayer COCHRAN THERESA H ANTHONY Parcel Number 2116500030 Parcel Number 2116500040 Site Address 4440 SW 313TH ST Site Address 4450 SW 313TH ST Zip code 98023 Zip code 98023 Taxpayer WRIGHT R I Taxpayer CONTRATTO RONALD Parcel Number 2116500050 Parcel Number 2116500060 Site Address 4458 SW 313TH ST Site Address 4462 SW 313TH ST Zip code 98023 Zip code 98023 Taxpayer JAEGER JAMES Taxpayer CAHILL RODERICK T JR CHRISTIAN Parcel Number 2116500070 Parcel Number 2116500080 Site Address 4461 SW 313TH ST Site Address 4459 SW 313TH ST Zip code 98023 Zip code 98023 Taxpayer BUDNICK ROBERT Taxpayer DEPEW MICHAEL J+KAREN J+QINGXIU JI A Parcel Number 2116500100 Parcel Number 2116500110 Site Address 4441 SW 313TH ST Site Address 4423 SW 313TH ST Zip code 98023 Zip code 98023 Taxpayer BROWN JAMES Taxpayer HUGHES L+KAREN M DIANNA+CHARLES RFC-EIVEI King County I Gib Center I News I Services I Comments 1 Search APR 06 2012 http://www5.kingcounty.gov/parcelviewer/Print—Process.asp CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 4/5/2012 Print Map Page Page 3 of 3 By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://www5.kingeounty.gov/pareelviewer/Print—Process. asp 4/5/2012 1121039010 1121039029 1121039063 CCAS PROPERTY & CONST CCAS PROPERTY & CONST KING COUNTY FIRE DIST 39 4700 SW DASH POINT RD 710 9TH AVE 31617 1ST AVE S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 SEATTLE, WA 98104 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 1121039077 1121039087 2115700160 CCAS PROPERTY & CONST CCAS PROPERTY & CONST KEMPTON SAMUEL S+CORINNE M 710 9TH AVE 710 9TH AVE 31250 47TH PL SW SEATTLE, WA 98104 SEATTLE, WA 98104 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 2115700170 2115700180 2115700190 JACKSON JEFFREY L+CAROL A PEIRCE FREDERICK CONNER JAMES 31244 47TH PL SW 31236 47TH PL SW 31228 47TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 2115700200 2115700210 2115700270 BEACH JEFFREY+CAUDILL MICHE AHRENS MICHAEL V+AMY M FEDERAL WAY CITY OF 31220 47TH PL SW 4720 SW 312TH PL 33325 8TH AVENUE S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003 2116500010 2116500020 2116500030 HEGEL TAMARA & ANTHONY COCHRAN THERESA H WRIGHT R I 31205 44TH AVE SW 4400 SW 313TH ST 4440 SW 313TH ST FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 2116500040 2116500050 2116500060 CONTRATTO RONALD JAEGER JAMES CHRISTIAN CAHILL RODERICK T JR 4450 SW 313TH ST 4458 SW 313TH ST 4462 SW 313TH ST FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 2116500070 2116500080 2116500090 BUDNICK ROBERT J+QINGXIU JI DEPEW MICHAEL J+KAREN A GREENER SCOTT E+JEANNINE BALE 4461 SW 313TH ST 4459 SW 313TH ST 4451 SW 313TH ST FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 2116500100 2116500110 BROWN JAMES L+KAREN M HUGHES DIANNA+CHARLES 4441 SW 313TH ST 4423 SW 313TH ST FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 NOAIDNA end Checklist to followtag agencies DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 39015 172"D AVE SE AUBURN WA 98002 um�. gay LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1 ST AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Doc. I.D. Tamara Fix From: Tamara Fix Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 11:28 AM To: 'ECY RE SEPA UNIT' Subject: AT & T Dumas Bay NOA & Opt DNS Attachments: ATT Dumas Bay DOE Pkt.pdf Attached is the NOA & Optional DNS and Environmental Checklist for an AT & T project in Dumas Bay in the City of Federal Way. This is being issued on April 20, 2012, and the Associate Planner for the project is Matt Herrera, 253-835- 2638, rnatthew.herrera cit offederalwa .com. 4ik CITY OF 411'::�� Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederolway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a,- 0 Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed eKe-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2012. Project Name File Number(s) j 5 y S V Signature Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/12/2012 2:20:00 PM Z CITY OF„"w•- Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: AT&T Mobility — Dumas Bay Project Description: Installation of two, new Long Term Evolution (LTE) antennas to an existing Personal Wireless Service Facility located on top of a Puget Sound Energy utility pole. The new antennas will increase the height of the pole from 52 feet to 61.5 feet and will be painted to match the existing wireless facility and utility pole. Ancillary ground equipment will be added to the existing equipment cabinet enclosure. Applicant: Sunny Ausink, Pacific Telecom Services, 1 l l S. Jackson Street, 4200, Seattle, WA 98104 Project Location: Public right-of-way on the north side of SW Dash Point Road east of the intersection of 47`h Ave. SW. Ground equipment installation on adjacent parcel 4451 SW 313' St_, Federal Way, WA 98023. Application Received: April 6, 2012 Determined Complete: April 17, 2012 Notice of Application: April 20, 2012 Comments Due: May 7, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-1 1-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes. and the public are encouraged to review and continent on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File 412-101543-UP) and State Environmental Policy.4ct Threshold Determination (File 412-101544-SE) Environmental Documents: Environmental Checklist Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, '-Environmental Policy" and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: Any person inay submit written comments on the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on May 7, 2012. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party, may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33326 8`' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 Doc ID 60901) Tamara Fix From: Rudi Alcott [ralcott@fedwaymirror.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:50 PM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Legal Notices Tamara, We will get this in for you. Take care, Rudi Alcott Publisher Federal Way Mirror p: 253.925.5565 x-1050 c: 253.336.5359 t: 206.390.5925 On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Tamara Fix <Tamara.Fix@cityoffederalwa�.com> wrote: Please issue the following three legal notices in the April 20, 2012 issue. AT&T FW East NOA & Opt DNS AT&T Mirror Lake NOA & Opt DNS AT&T Dumas Bay NOA & Opt DNS Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication of each of them. Thank you! FYI, we'll have several again next week. Tamara Fix Adnin Asst. City of FederaC-Way tamara, tx@cit o ederat wa .com 1 41k CITY Federala. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cJLUffedera1way.com ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 43.21C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions. For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respective ECEIVE® APR 016 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: AT&T MOBILITY SS65 Dumas Bay 2. Name of applicant: AT&T MOBILITY 16221 NE 72ND WAY, RTC 3 REDMOND, WA 98052 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: SUNNY AUSINK/PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES 111 S. JACKSON STREET, 2ND FLOOR SEATTLE, WA 98104 SAUSINK@PT5WA.COM 206-446-0448 4. Date checklist prepared: APRIL 4, 2012 5. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): CONSTRUCTION WILL BEGIN UPON RECEIPT OF APPLICABLE PERMITS. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. YES, POSSIBLE UPGRADE OR ANTENNAS REPLACEMENT IF NEED BE. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NONE KNOWN 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NONE KNOWN Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY— SEPA DNS, PROCESS III LAND USE APPROVAL AND ELECTRICAL PERMIT. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. AT&T proposes to modify an existing wireless facility located on an existing PSE utility pole by adding (2) new LTE antennas and ancillary equipment. No height increase proposed. Proposed antennas will be painted to match existing. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Located within the right of way of 4451 SW 313th Street, Federal Way, WA 98023 — APN#2116500090 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. GENERALLY FLAT b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? LESS THAN 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. MAINLY CLAY Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NONE KNOWN e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. THERE WILL BE NO FILLING OR GRADING TO THIS SITE. THIS IS AN EXISTING FACILITY, NO GROUND DISTURBANCE PROPOSED. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. EROSION COULD ONLY OCCUE FROM HEAVY MACHINERY MOVING ABOUTTHE SITE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NOTAPPLICABLE. NO GROUND DISTURBANCE PROPOSED. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WILL BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. MINIMAL EMISSIONS WOULD RESULT FROM THE PROPOSAL. ANY POSSIBLE EMISSIONS WILL BE FROM VEHICLES ENTERING AND LEAVING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NONE. Bulletin #050 —January 1, 2011 Page 4 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. NOT APPLICABLE 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NONE 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE PROPOSED 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NONE PROPOSED 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Bulletin #050 —January 1, 2011 Page 5 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist NOT APPLICABLE b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NOT APPLICABLE c. Water Runoff (including stormwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. NOT APPLICABLE 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NOT APPLICABLE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. NONE PROPOSED Bulletin #050 —January 1, 2011 Page 6 of 18 k:\landouts\Environmental Checklist 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. _x_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other —evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _x- shrubs _x_ grass pasture crop or grain wetsoil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plant: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? THIS IS EXISTING, NO VEGETATION WILL BE REMOVED OR ALTERED. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. NONE PROPOSED, THIS IS AN EXISTING WIRELESS FACILITY. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other Bulletin #050 - January 1, 2011 Page 7 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NO d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. NONE PROPOSED 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. THE PROJECT WILL REQUIRE ACCESS TO EXISTING ELECTRICAL POWER AND TELEPHONE b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. PROJECT WILL NOT AFFECT THE POTENTIAL USE OF SOLAR ENERGY BY ADJACENT PROPERTIES. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. NONE 7, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 8 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NONE 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. THIS IS UNSTAFFED WIRELESS FACILITY, NO EMERGENCY SERVICES REQUIRED. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. NONE PROPOSED. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? NONE 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. THE ONLY NOISE WILL BE FROM THE EXISTING RADIO EQUIPMENT WHICH IS COMPARABLE TO THE SOUND OF AN AIR CONDITIONER. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. NONE NEEDED 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Existing AT&T facility in an RS9.6 Residential Zone Bulletin #050 —January 1, 2011 Page 9 of 18 k:\landouts\Environmental Checklist b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing AT&T facility. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RS9.6 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NOT KNOWN h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally critical area? If so, specify. NONE i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 10 of 18 k:\flandouts\Environmental Checklist NONE, THIS IS AN UNSTAFFED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. NO MEASURES PROPOSED I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. None proposed. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE, THIS IS AN UNSTAFFED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. NOT APPLICABLE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 11 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist exterior building material(s) proposed? Existing PSE utility pole is at 52'-0" with AT&T antennas located on it. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NO VIEWS WILL BE IMPACTED c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Proposed antennas will be painted to match existing PSE utility pole. 11. LIGHTAND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? ►19] c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? 061 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. NONE PROPOSED Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 12 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE IDENTIFIED b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. NOT APPLICABLE 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Iffel b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. NONE PROPOSED Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 13 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 14. TRANSPORTATION Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. NO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WILL BE NEEDED FOR THIS UNMANNED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NOT APPLICABLE — SITE WILL NOT REQUIRE PUBLIC ACCESS. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? THE SITE WILL NOT ELIMINATE ANY PARKING STALLS. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NONE e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NONE f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. THE SITE WILL REQUIRE APPROXIMATELY ONE (1) VISIT PER MONTH BY A TECHNICIAN FOR SITE MAINTENANCE PURPOSES. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 14 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. NONE 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a_ Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NOT APPLICABLE b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NOT APPLICABLE 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other (please list) ELECTRICTY & TELEPHONE IS AVAILABLE AT SITE b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. ELECTRICITY & TELEPHONE WILL BE NEEDED. Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 15 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. SIGNATURE: DATE SUBMITTED: Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 16 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the proposal, of the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, and if they are likely to affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? NOT APPLICABLE Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases: NONE PROPOSED 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? NOT APPLICABLE Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life: NONE PROPOSED 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy of natural resources? NOT APPLICABLE Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources: NONE PROPOSED 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally critical areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, Bulletin #050 — January 1, 2011 Page 17 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? NOT APPLICABLE Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts. NOT APPLICABLE 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. NOT APPLICABLE Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts: NONE PROPOSED 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? NONE PROPOSED Proposed measures to reduce of respond to such demands: NOT APPLICABLE 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. NOT APPLICABLE Bulletin 4050 — January 1, 2011 Page 18 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 111 S Jackson St, 2nd Floor Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 342 9000 04 April 2012 City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RE: Process III Application Narrative — AT&T site modification —SS65 Dumas Bay Site address: PSE Pole in the ROW of 4451 SW 313th Street, Federal Way, 98023 Dear Sir or Madam, Enclosed please find an the Master Land Use Application and eight (8) sets of drawings for a proposed AT&T modification to an existing wireless site located in the right of way of 4451 SW 313th Street, Federal Way, APN#2116500090. The proposed modification consists of adding (2) new LTE antennas and ancillary equipment to the existing PSE utility pole. Proposed modifications do not change the use of the existing tower. AT&T proposes to increase the height of the utility pole from 52'-0" to 61'-6". There is no reduction, material change or adverse impact to landscaping, parking, utilities, approved architectural design, or environmentally critical areas as defined by FWRC 19.145. ANALYSES OF STEALTH SCREENING FOR PROPOSED FACILITY PER FWRC 119.225.020(4). The modification will not result in a change in visual impact, and is part of a technology upgrade being performed on AT&T/New Cingular Wireless's network, in order to improve service to its customers and strengthen reliability and capacity in its network. Pursuant to FWRC 19.255.020(20, PWSFs shall be screened or camouflaged through employing the best available technology and design. As proposed, the antennas are not overtly obtrusive. The proposed antennas will be painted to match the existing utility pole. The proposed equipment additions are exempt and no review is required as there are no material area expansions of the equipment area. Per the pre -application conference summary (#12-100713-00-PC), the submitted site plans do not need to depict existing landscaping around the existing enclosures. This is an existing wireless telecommunications facility located at the address referenced above. AT&T proposes to amend the facility to keep up with the demand while continuing to offer customers in the area quality service and access to greater and more advanced wireless services. The proposed change would add 4G technology to the site and would expand AT&T's 4G network footprint into and the immediate surrounding area. This proposed change would improve the on -street and in -car availability of 4G services (voice and data support for iPhone 4G phones for example) and would add in -building 4G services in the immediate vicinity of the site. Our current volume and payload data on this site shows a high amount of 3G data traffic. The new 4G technology will improve the overall internet/data experience of the customers in the area. This will mean faster data rate and higher efficiency. The proposed modification is part of an integrated network and if it is located too far or too close to an adjacent facility the network will not work. n The location of the site was picked because it is an existing facility. The proposed modification is part of 3 AT&T's network implementation plan to provide 4G LTE coverage in the Federal Way area. The proposed installation of the antennas/ancillary equipment is intended to operate using the existinU tt' EIVE® equipment and infrastructure at the established site. Installing LTE in another location would regi� APR 0 6 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 111 S Jackson St, 2^1 Floor Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 342 9000 building a completely new site, thus doubling the presence of wireless facilities within the same quarter mile area. There are no alternative sites that would provide the needed height to allow for the proper functioning of the equipment. There are no multifamily, commercial, or industrial structures tall enough to meet the required height coverage for this site. Alternative sites that would provide the needed height coverage would mean that AT&T would need to propose a new wireless tower or utilization of a city light pole and locate its antennas on it or locate on a new multifamily structure and increase its height — these proposals would aesthetically be more detrimental to the neighborhood. A new facility would not be less intrusive than what is being proposed. The proposed location not only will provide the needed coverage for AT&T it will also lead to fewer adverse impacts on adjacent land uses. Here, collocating the replacing the antennas contains the impacts of the additional antennas to a single location, thus impacting fewer properties. In addition, utilizing the existing equipment lease area and ground equipment further reduces impacts to other properties in the area by avoiding duplicate ground installations at multiple locations, eliminating the need for extensive trenching between the existing ground equipment and alternative locations. In addition, the proposed facility is a passive use; there are no activities that will produce airborne emissions, odor, vibration, heat, glare, or noxious/toxic materials. The site will operate continually, 24 hours a day for seven days a week. The site will be unmanned, requiring only frequent visits by maintenance personnel, typically once a month. Due to the limited amount of traffic generated by the proposal, no off -site street improvements are required for this application. The facility will not require water or wastewater facilities or contribute to erosion due to storm water run-off. The construction valuation is $15,000. The above statements are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand City of Federal Way is relying on them to make its decision. Enclosed with this narrative you will find: • Master Land Use Application • Applicable Fees • SEPA Checklist • (8) copies of the site plan folded • (8) copies of existing/proposed elevations folded Color & Materials Indicators (photos) Please let me know if you require further information to process this application. Please feel free contact me with any questions you may have or if you need additional items from me at (206)446-0448 or via email at sausink tswa.com. C Sincerely, N Sunny Ausink Land Use Planner Pacific Telecom Services sausinkpptswa.com (206)446-0448 o o wy� � �w • a� __ y� ri{1a m _ yeeQQjj o ay EZ096 VM 'AVM 1Ytl303J (18 1NIOd HSVO ONV MS 3AV HJIV 59SS W9 svwna Ewa �g 6Q p i777 8�2 � J. © Z � L •' u � > LL a� vp U i tl n� U- 0 u Print Map Page Page 1 of 1 SS65 PARCEL MAP i84u800005 11210390W 1121039029 11210077 2116500060 2116600040 2116500020 11v039081 217650050 21165000M 2115700210 2116500U70 � ;,;8500090 Federal# ay a 21,SAIMO liiSSOJiL�O 2ii6500ii0 � 2ii65000a0 2iiG50nn90 �'� 2ii570Ui9u -� 2ii5700270 �; ii27039063 �1i2i03906U � f �i (C)2010 Kio County i�5211 Parcel Number 2116500090 Site Address 4451 SW 313TH ST Zip code 98023 Taxpayer GREENER SCOTT E+JEANNINE BALE The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or Implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information_ King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost proAls resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." King County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. RECEIVE® APR 0 6 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS http://www5.kingeounty.gov/parcelviewer/Print—Process. asp 4/3/2012 SS65 DUMAS BAY 47TH AVE SW AND DASH POINT RD FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 ATU " obi[ity 16221 NE 72nd Way Redmond, WA 98052 Becky Todd - Phone: (206) 310-1793 View #: 1 GoodmanNetworks Sat&t December 12, 2011 The illustration above is a representation of the proposed project based on information provided by the client. Actual construction may vary dependent on approved construction plans and therefore Pis (Pacific i elecom services) is not responsime for any post production design changes. Monotree disclaimer: (In the event that the proposed installation includes a monotree) The proposed installation is an artistic representation of a tree, and not intended to be an exact reproduction of an actual livingtree. The final installation will have cables, cable ports, and various attachments, such as antennas, nuts, and bolts. While every effort will be made to disguise these components, they will not be readily apparentto the casual observer or passerby. However, upon close scrutiny, the true nature of the installation will be apparent. REV: Prepared by: CJL Pacific Telecom Services, LLC 3199 C Airport Loop Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626-3414 SS65 DUMAS BAY 47TH AVE SW AND DASH PO: NT RD FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023 AT&T iY obl[ity 16221 NE 72nd Way Redmond, WA 98052 Becky Todd - Phone: (206) 310-1793 View #: 2 GoodmanNetworks at&t cftw;� December 12, 2011 The illustration above is a representation of the proposed project based on information provided by the client Actual construction may vary dependent on approved construction plans ano inereTore via [vacant I elecorn aelvwzaj IJ nui I—RU11-- for any post production design changes. Monotree disclaimer: (In the event that the proposed installation includes a monotree) The proposed installation is an artistic representation of a tree, and not intended to be an exact reproduction of an actual living tree. The final installation will have cables, cable ports, and various attachments, such as antennas, nuts, and bolts. While every effort will be made to disguise these components, they will not be readily apparent to the casual observer or passerby. However, upon close scrutiny, the true nature of the installation will be apparent. — REV: Prepared by: CJL Pacific Telecom Services, LLC [A] 3199 C Airport Loop Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626-3414 RECEIVED MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION M Q 2 DEPA.RTN ENT or CoNmL ` iry DEVELOpNiENT SERVICES •� �^� e` 33325 8h Avenue South CITY OF: ;,, ,�..- y� t n PO Box 9718 ������� � }�,� �� �� FEDERAL YYHY Federal Way WA 98063-9718 v y ��ryc 253-835-2607; Fax 253-935-2609 V S www.cityoffed Iwavxom APPLICATION NO(S) ProjectName AT&T MOBILITY SS65 DUMAS BAY Property Address/Location 4451 SW 313TH STREET, FEDERALWAY, WA 98023 Parcel Number(s) Project Description 2116500090 AT&T MOBILITY - MODIFICATION TO EXISTING SITE BY UPRGRADING WITH LTE ANTENNAS AND ADDING ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT PER PLANS Type of Permit Required _ Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone _ Land Surface Modification _ Lot Line Elimination _ Preapplication Conference _ Process I (Director=s Approval) _ Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) _ Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) _ Process VI X SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information i • & Zoning Designation Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements 515,000 Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): 1+t_� _ Z Occupancy Type 1 f✓ Construction Type Applicant Name: AT&T MOBILITY Address: 16221 NE 72ND WAY, RTC 3 City/State: REDMOND, WA Zip: 98052 Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: SUNNY AUSINK/ PTS Address: 111 S_ JACKSON STREET#200 City/State: SEATTLE, WA Zip: 98104 Phone: 206-446 0448 Fax: 206-903-8513 Email: SALfSINK@PTS,WA COM Signature: IATI - i Name: (tt +„ a -r4J Address: 35,C Ito City"State: a�Zlilrc.Y Zip: LAA Phone: C1 Y00+ Fax: - f Email: Za C- . �¢1 . D a Signature: AWAv _3..ar e r• Cft', Bulletin #003 — August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 k:iRandouts\Master Land Use Application