The URL can be used to link to this page

17-105490CITY OF t. Federal Way December 12, 2017 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8ch Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 eric.labrie@esmcivil.com 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re: File Nos. 17-105489-00-UP & 17-105490-00-SE; NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Greenline Business Park, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: The Department of Community Development has conducted a cursory review of information you submitted to the city on November 14, 2017, in order to determine if the application is complete for the proposed Greenline Business Park Use Process IV and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) reviews. INCOMPLETE APPLICATION During the course of the city's review, the following items were found to be missing or incomplete. In order for your application to be considered complete and ready for processing, the items below must be provided. • Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) • Noise Analysis • Air Quality Analysis • Visual Impact Analysis • Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation Analysis as follows: Provide an inventory of the project site and surrounding Weyerhaeuser campus to evaluate the property for its historical and architectural significance. The inventory shall be conducted by qualified cultural resource professionals with expertise in architectural history and archaeology and that have knowledge of using DAHP's on-line Historic Property Inventory and Archaeological Site Inventory databases. i. Be aware that DAHP requires that all documents related to project reviews be submitted electronically. Correspondence, reports, notices, photos, etc. must now be submitted in PDF or JPG format. For more information about how to submit documents to DAHP please visit: http://www.dahp.wa.gov/p gramslshpo-compliance. ii. To assist in conducting a cultural resource survey and inventory effort, DAHP has developed guidelines, including requirements for survey reports, which is available on their website. Mr. LaBrie December 12, 2017 Page 2 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL COMMENTS During the City's review of the proposal for completeness, City staff noted a potential major issue regarding stormwater drainage requirements as follows: Based on the information provided in the Technical Information Report (TIR), it appears this project may meet the requirement for Large Project Drainage Review as outlined in the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM Section 1.1.1, p. 1-12, AND meets the following criteria): The project would, at full buildout, result in 50 acres or more of new impervious surface within a single subbasin or multiple subbasins that are hydraulically connected across subbasin boundaries. If so, then a Master Drainage Plan will need to be prepared per the requirements of Appendix B of the KCSWDM. It is the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate that the project does not meet the requirements of a Large Project Drainage Review. Since the application is incomplete, a technical review of the proposal has not been conducted. A complete technical review of the Process IV and SEPA applications will occur after all the missing items are submitted. Technical review of the project will likely result in a request for amended or additional technical information necessary to review the proposal. Any resubmittals for this application must be accompanied with a resubmittal form (enclosed). After receipt of the requested information noted in the incomplete application section of this letter, the department will notify you within 14 days whether your application is considered complete for processing, or what, if any, information is still needed. The review clock for processing your formal application will not begin until all items are submitted. Please contact me at jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com, or 253 835-2652, if you have any questions. Sincerely, ?4)1m Harris Planner enc: Resubmittal Form c: Tom Messmer, tmessmer@industrialrealtygroup.com Brian Davis, Director of Community Development Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District, via email 17-105489-00-UP Doc. LD. 76976 CONSULTING -L-MAINE_ 8th Avenue South, Suite 205 Feder ® ` Federal Way, WA 98003 MEMORANDUM TO: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FROM: MATT REIDER RE: PARKING ANALYSIS JOB #: 1886-001-016-0016 DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2017 RECEIVED NOV 112017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNfTY DEVELOPMi:Nj' This Memo documents the parking analysis for the Greenline Business Park development Project Description The proposal for Greenline Business Park seeks to develop 3 new buildings of varying sizes (1,068,000 SF of new GFA). The Greenline Technology Center (1,327,500 SF) will remain; however, the parking lot associated with the Tech Center will be reconfigured to allow for construction of the new buildings. Building A will be 638,000 SF in size, Building B will be 282,500 SF in size, and Building C will be 147,500 SF in size. City of Federal Way Code -Required Parking City of Federal Way code -required off-street parking is based on 1994 Zoning Code as modified by the provisions of Section All of the CP-01 Zoning Regulations, and requires the following: 1 stall per 1,000 SF warehouse Based on the included site plan with a combined total of 2,395,500 square feet of commercial space on the Greenline Business Park site, the applicant is required to provide 2,396 code required stalls. The current site plan is providing 1,466 car parking stalls and 111 trailer parking stalls for a combined total of 1,577 off-street parking stalls. Parking Demand The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation manual, 0 Edition was used to provide parking information for this specific parking study. The ITE Parking Generation manual for the industrial land uses provides parking demand rates and equations to estimate parking demand. ITE practices dictate the use of the equation when a minimum amount of studies is provided and the data points represent a trend in parking demand as building area increases. In the case of the "warehouse" category, the equation best represents parking demand. No office space was calculated to be a part of the proposal as an accurate representation cannot be provided until a tenant has been identified. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Project Management • Public Works • Land Planning • Landscape Architecture Phone 253.838.6113 800.345-5694 Fax 253.838.7104 Parking Code Comparison to Demand A comparison of minimum parking requirements for the proposed Preferred Freezer development based on Federal Way City Code requirements (Section 18A35.040), and information provided in the ITE Parking Generation manual, are shown below in Table 1. Table 1 - Parkinci Comj3arison City of Federal Wav ITE Parkinq Generation Code Minimum Estimated Parking Parking Land Use Size Units ITE LUC Code Required Rate Demand Warehouse 2,395,500 GFA 150 1:1,000 2,396 Equation' 981 SF TOTAL 2.395.550 1 1 2,396 981 1. ITE Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition, 2010. LUC 150 Equation= 0.41 x(2,395,500} 1 As shown in Table 1, the Greenline Business Park development is estimated to have an estimated parking demand (981 stalls) that would be accommodated by the proposed parking supply (1,577 stalls) despite providing parking that is less than City minimum code requirements. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Project Management • Public Works • Land Planning • Landscape Architecture Phone 253.838.6113 800.345-5694 Fax 253.838.7104 ►f:11 PRIZE s o d:1 R \O November 14, 2017 Mr. Jim Harris Senior Planner City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Job No. 1886-001-016 RECEIVED NOV 112017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REr Greenline Business Park, Process IV Land Use Application with SEPA Dear Mr. Harris: On behalf of Federal Way Campus, LLC, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC is pleased to submit a Process IV land use application with SEPA to the City of Federal Way for review and processing. Federal Way Campus, LLC is seeking to develop property surrounding the former Weyerhaeuser Technology Center, now referred to as the Greenline Technology Center located at 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way. The proposed development includes construction of 3 buildings of varying sizes totaling f1,068,000 sq. ft.; reconfiguration of; and addition to, the existing parking lot which surrounds the Greenline Technology Center; dedication and frontage improvements along Weyerhaeuser Way South and S 336th Street; as well as construction of five stormwater ponds. No development as part of this proposal will occur within 200 feet of the OHWM of North Lake. The proposed development will primarily occur on parcels 162104-9056, -9013, and -9030 while one of the proposed stormwater ponds for the project will be located on the east side of Weyerhaeuser Way South on Parcel 152104-9178. Please note that under a separate application we will be submitting one more Boundary Line Adjustment in order to adjust the boundary of parcel -9013 so that it is no longer bisected by the Weyerhaeuser Way South right-of-way. Design Narrative Federal Way Campus, LLC recognizes that the former Weyerhaeuser Campus consisted of properties "characterized by large contiguous sites with landscape, open space amenities, and buildings of superior quality." The Greenline Business Park seeks to continue that design intent by pro c bg large segments of open space such as the meadow on the Q` north side of S 3-86th Street, forested areas behind the proposed buildings as shown on the included site plan, and through the enhancement of natural areas located between Weyerhaeuser Way South and North Lake. Additional open space is provided through the management of 50-foot and 100-foot wide managed forest buffers that run parallel to the ESM Federal Way 33400 8th Ave S, Ste 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 253.838.6113 tel 800.345.5694tollfree ]" sl4R 71rld fax ESM Everett 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Everett, WA 98208 425.297.9900 tel 800.345.5694 tall free ,125.737.99DI fax Civil Engineering Land Planning Land Surveying Landscape Architecture 3D Laser Scanning GIS www.esmcivil.com Mr. Jim Harris November 14, 2017 Page 2 northern site boundary and 1-5, respectively. Landscaping is provided around the proposed parking areas and in landscape islands throughout. The proposed buildings represent superior quality by the voluntary integration of many community design details v as prescribed in FWRC 19.115. The proposed buildings incorporate fapade modulation,�_, s„ recessed windows, and large expanses of transparent glass similar to the Greenline Technology Center. None of the proposed buildings will exceed six stories; in fact the building height is proposed to be 42'-0". No blank walls exist on the proposed buildings �1�5 as a combination of vertical banding, mountain reveal patterns, varying window shapes, trellis features and overhangs are incorporated into the design. Pa. rkina Modification Request Surrounding the buildings will be a total of 1,466. parking stalls and 111 trailer stalls. Pursuant to FWCC Sec 22-1397 Federal Way Campus, LLC is seeking a modification to the prescribed parking stall requirements outlined in the 1994 Zoning Code as modified by the provisions of Section XIII of the CP-01 Zoning Regulations. Included with this submittal is a Parking Analysis Memo which demonstrates that the parking need is less than the provided parking stall count. Request for Waiver of Submittal Requirements Some reports being required by the City submittal standards are unable to be provided until additional information is provided by the City of Federal Way. Currently, Federal Way Campus, LLC is waiting on the City of Federal Way Public Works Department for a scoping form which is required to conduct and complete the Traffic Impact Analysis and Traffic Concurrency Review. Air and Noise studies require the data from the Traffic Impact Analysis in order to conduct the necessary studies and complete the reports. Furthermore, the pre -application summary letter requested that Federal Way Campus, LLC provide a visual impact analysis and analysis per Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. More details which describe the scope of each analysis are required in order to provide reports which are responsive to the City of Federal Way requirements as well as the requirements of the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. We respectfully request that the review of the Process IV and SEPA application materials that are currently available are reviewed by the City until the necessary information is provided by the City. As a result, the following items are not included in this submittal; however, they will be included in a later submittal upon receipt of further information from the City: 1. Traffic Impact Analysis; 2. Environmental Noise Report; 3. Air Quality Technical Information Report; 4. Visual impact Analysis; and 5. Analysis per D.A.H.P. Requirements. Traffic/Circulation Access to this facility will be provided off of Weyerhaeuser Way South in four locations, 2 of which being approximately 40 feet in width to accommodate truck turning movements and the remaining two will be 30 feet wide to accommodate standard vehicles. The northernmost access has been located approximately 450 feet south of the northern property line as measured along the ROW. The second 40-foot wide access is proposed to be located near the current entrance to the northern parking lot of the WTC. This driveway will function as a shared access servicing both the proposed warehouse Jim Harris November 14, 2017 Page 3 buildings and the WTC property. Street frontage improvements will occur along the entire length of the project site on both Weyerhaeuser Way South and S 336th Street Dedications and improvements are required on both sides of these rights -of -way to accommodate provisions of "Arterial/Collector Section K" as noted in the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, revised 2015. Storm Stormwater runoff from the new development will be collected and routed to five separate stormwater treatment and detention facilities located around the project to reflect the existing stormwater basins. One stormwater pond will be located on Parcel No. 152104- 9178, which is east of Weyerhaeuser Way South. The outfall of this pond will be used to rehydrate the wetlands in this area. The remaining four ponds will be located southwest and southeast of the proposed buildings. Each pond is sized per the recently adopted, 2016 King County Stormwater Design Manual. After detention and treatment, stormwater will be released at pre -developed rates to the natural downstream drainage paths. Included with this Process IV and SEPA submittal are the following application materials: 1. Completed Master Land Use Application; 2. Application Fee (check for $5,989.28); 3. Pre -Application Summary Letter; 4. Title Report (2 copies); 5. Letters of Water and Sewer Availability (2 copies); 6; Site Photographs (8 copies); 7. Signed and Completed SEPA Checklist (8 copies); 8. Process IV Plan Set (8 copies); 9. Preliminary Technical Information Report (4 copies); 10. Trip Generation Memo (4 copies); 11. Parking Study (4 copies); 12. Critical Areas Report and Conceptual Mitigation Plan (4 copies); and 13. Geotechnical Report (4 copies); 14. Pavement analysis (4 copies) 15. Evaluation of trees (4 copies) If you have any questions or require further information, please contact me immediately via email or phone at 253-838-6113. Sincerely, WD NGINEERS, LLC Assistant Planner Enc: As Noted CC: Tom Messmer, Federal Way Campus, LLC Jack McCullough, McCullough Hill Learly PS I lesm8leng rlesm-j obs1188610011016-0016Wocumentlletter-003.docx CITY OF �L Federal Way FILE, CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 wwwcityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor December 13, 2017 Ms. Ilon Logan ESA 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 ilogan@esLassoo.com Re: File #17-105489-UP; REQUEST FOR THIRD PARTY REVIEW Greenline Business Park Critical Area Report C & Conceptual Mitigation Plan 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Ms. Logan: Enclosed please find the task authorization form and a hard copy of the Critical Area Report and Conceptual Mitigation Plan for third parry review. City staff is requesting review pursuant to the agreed terms of the on -call contract. Please review the scope of work on the task authorization form, enter the task cost on page two of the document, sign, and return it to the city. Following the deposit of funds by the applicant, staff will provide you with an authorization to proceed with the scope of work. The Critical Area Report and Conceptual Mitigation Plan can also be found on the City's FTP site. Please contact me at 253-835-2652, or jinn.harrisr7cityoffederalway.com if you have any questions regarding this task. Sincerely, arris Planner enc: Task Authorization Form Critical Area Report (on ftp) Engineering Plan Set (on ftp) E MEMORANDUM Federal Way Community Development Department WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: December 12, 2017 City: Community Development Department 33325 8t' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Consultant: Eon Logan, ESA 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 illo an a7es_assoc.com Project: Greenline Business Park — Critical Areas Report and Conceptual Mitigation Plan, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South File No.: 17-105489-UP Project Proponent: ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8`" Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 eric.labrie esmcivil.com City Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris — 253.835.2652, 'im.harris ci offederalwa .com Project Background: Applicant has proposed three new warehouse buildings totaling approximately 1.1 million square feet, plus utilities, parking, parking area revisions, five storm drainage ponds, etc. The property is located north of South 336t' Street, between Interstate-5 and Weyerhaeuser Way. ESA has previously reviewed and approved the critical area classifications and delineations for these properties. Documents Provided: • Critical Areas Report and Conceptual Mitigation Plan — Greenline Business Park, by Talasaea, October 27, 2017 (item 015 in ftp folder) • Preliminary Engineering Plan Set, by ESM (item 009 in ftp folder) • Both documents are available on the city's ftp site: ft :/1 .cit offederalwa .com/Outbox/Greenline°/ 2OSubmittal°/n2ODo cuments/ Task Scope: • Review report for compliance with current FWRC critical area regulations. • Review proposed mitigation for compliance with current FWRC requirements. • Conduct site visit as necessary. • Provide written response to findings, recommendations, and request additional information from applicant if needed. • Possible meeting with applicant's wetland biologist. • Two meetings with City staff. ■ Hearing Examiner public hearing meeting attendance. • Review of resubmitted/corrected documents as needed. Task Schedule: Provide a task cost estimate ASAP. Review work is not authorized until authorized in writing by city. Task Cost: Not to exceed $ without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. Acceptance: (Consultant) (City Staff) Date Date (Applicant) Date i `� 5309 Shilshole Avenue, NW r �� Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 phone 206.789.9684 fax memorandum date April 11, 2018 to Jim Harris, City of Federal Way Department of Community Development from Jessica Redman and Ilon Logan www.esassoc.com subject Critical Areas Report and Conceptual Mitigation Plan Review: Greenline Business Park - DRAFT At the request of the City of Federal Way (City), Environmental Science Associates (ESA) reviewed the Critical Areas Report and Conceptual Mitigation Plan — Greenline Business Park (dated October 27, 2017) prepared by Talasaea Consultants Inc. for the property at approximately 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South in Federal Way, Washington. The 146-acre site is a combination of six parcels (King County Tax Parcel Numbers 1621049056, 1521049178, 1621049013, 1621049030, 2285000010, and 797820.0420) currently owned by Federal Way Campus, LLC. This property was reviewed by ESA between May and August of 2017 as part of the Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment project. Several site visits were conducted to evaluate wetland boundaries. Results were reported to the City in the Existing Conditions Report — Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment technical memo (dated August 22, 2017). The current application. involves the construction of three new buildings that will provide approximately 1,068,000 square feet (SF) of new warehouse and office space. The Tech Center building will remain and the existing parking lot will be reconfigured to maximize space. Associated infrastructure to be constructed includes five new stormwater detention facilities, parking for cars and trucks, and maneuvering space for the anticipated truck traffic around these buildings. Site Background and Purpose of Review In 1994, the Weyerhaeuser Company entered into a pre -annexation zoning agreement with the City, known as the Concomitant Agreement, to ensure that once annexed, the Weyerhaeuser Company Campus was developed "with maximum flexibility which will insure optimal development, while preserving the unique natural features of the site" (Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre- Annexation Zoning Agreement, 1994). The purpose of this review is to determine if the proposed project is in compliance with Concomitant Agreement, Chapter 19.145 (Critical Areas) of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), and Chapter 15.10 (Critical Areas in Shoreline Management Areas) of the FWRC. Review of Documents Critical Areas Report and Conceptual Mitigation Plan Review: Greenline Business Park - DRAFT ESA reviewed the Critical Areas Report and Conceptual Mitigation Plan — Greenline Business Park (dated October 27, 2017 and hereinafter referred to as the Report) and the Greenline Business Park Site Plan prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers (dated November 15, 2017). According to the documents, sixty-three wetlands and one stream occur within the site of the Business Park project (the Project). The site is also adjacent to North Lakc, a shoreline of the state. Construction of the three buildings, stormwater facilities, and parking areas would impact 13,428 SF (0.31 acre) of wetlands. Four wetlands would be insufficiently buffered, and therefore are being considered indirectly impacted due to site development encroachments, resulting in an additional 4,912 SF (0.11 acre) of impact. The total 18,340 SF (0.42 acre) of direct and indirect wetland impacts would be mitigated for through 36,023 SF (0.82 acre) of wetland creation and 2,020 SF (0.05) of wetland enhancement. Wetland mitigation will meet and exceed ratios provided in FWRC 19.145.430(5) and will occur onsite in the vicinity of North Lake. In addition, 98,168 SF (2.3 acres) wetland buffer will be created around the area of wetland creation. No work will occur within the ordinary high water of the stream. However, the buffer on the east side of the stream would be reduced by 25% to 75-feet to accommodate the development. The total stream buffer reduction of 12,545 SF (0.29 acre) will be mitigated for by adding an additional 14,489 SF (0.33 acre) of stream buffer to the west side of the stream. 94,266 SF (2.2 acres) of the existing and proposed stream buffer will also be enhanced by removing invasive species and subsequently planting native trees and shrubs. Finally, a gravel path and berm that occur within the site will be removed and replanted with native trees and shrubs. This will account for approximately 35,689 SF (0.8 acre) of wetland and stream buffer enhancement. Review Comments and Recommendations As documented in our previous review of the Tech Center BLA (memo dated August 22, 2017), we agree with the wetland delineation boundaries, rating forms, and rating classifications established by Talasaea for wetlands occurring on the proposed project site. ► We generally agree with the conceptual mitigation plan and believe that the proposed mitigation site appears to be an adequate location for wetland creation. As the mitigation design progresses, we strongly recommend that the applicant perform further environmental investigations (groundwater level monitoring, soil analysis, etc.) at the proposed mitigation site to acquire the necessary data and information to inform mitigation feasibility and design. Impacts to wetlands should be minimized to the extent possible. It appears that the proposed 820 SF of wetland fill in Wetland DE may be avoided by minimal design alterations while still resulting in a viable project. We recommend impacts to this wetland are reevaluated. • The City considers grading within a wetland buffer to be development, and therefore, the applicant should show that the proposed temporary buffer impacts due to site grading meet the criteria under FWRC 19.145.440 — Development within wetland buffers. Temporary buffer impacts should also be included on the figures in the Report. Referring to Figure WI.3 of the Report, it appears that buffer creation is proposed in the existing buffer of Wetlands BB and BD North. This area should not be considered to be new buffer and the Report and figures should be revised to reflect any changes. 2 Critical Areas Report and Conceptual Mitigation r lan Review: Greenline Business Park - DRAFT The wetland buffers on the Site Plan are inconsistent with the wetland buffers on the figures in the Report. For example, buffers for Wetlands BA-2, PK, and BB appear larger on the Site Plan than on Figure WI.1 in the Report. The Site Plan should be revised to reflect the buffers presented in the Report. • Sheets of the Site Plan that contain the proposed development should only show the buffers post - development and should not include existing buffers for wetlands that will be filled or indirectly impacted. Site Plan sheets should be revised to show post -development buffers and an existing conditions figure should be added to the Site Plan. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 16, 2017 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue Lindsey Sperry, Public Safety Officer Rob Van Orsow, Solid Waste/Recycling Coordinator FROM: Jim Harris FOR DRC MTG. ON: December 7, 2017 DATE - Internal FILE NUMBER(s): 17-105490-00-SE & 17-105489-UP PROJECT NAME: GREENLINE BUSINESS PARK PROJECT ADDRESS: 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South ZONING DISTRICT: CP-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review and UP 4 for development of (3) new warehouse buildings total approximately 1.1 million square feet. Reconfiguration and addition of associated parking spaces, ROW dedication and frontage improvements. Existing Greenline Technology Center will remain. LAND USE PERMITS: SEPA and Process 4 Hearing Examiner PROJECT CONTACT: ERIC LABRIE - ESM MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Master Land Use Application ESM Cover Letter 11/14/17 SEPA checklist Title Report Water and Sewer Avail letters Process 4 Plan set Stormwater TIR Trip Gen Memo Parking Study Critical Areas Report Geotech Report Pavement Analysis Tree Evaluation RECEIVED MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF 33325 8`s Avenue South NOV 1 q 2017 Federal Way, WA 98003=6325 Federal Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY www.eirvoffederalway.coni COMMIINfTY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO(S) Date / 1 -1 `f -- / ? Project Name Greenling Business Park Property Address/Location Generally 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way S. SE 16-21-014 Parcel Number(s) 162104-9056, -9013, -9030 and 1521049178 Project Description Development of 3 new buildings of varying sizes, reconfiguration and addition of associated parking spaces, ROW dedication and frontage improvements. Existing Greenline Technology Center will remain. See attached site plan for details. PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezohe Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Proj ect SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required information Zoning Designation Comprehensive Plan Designation of Existing Improvements -osed Improvements pancy Type .struction Type Applicant Name: Tom Messmer c/o Federal Way Campus, LLC Address: 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 City/State: Los Angeles, CA Zip: 90025 Phone: (310) 261-4382 Fax: Email: tmessmer ' rialrealtygroup.com Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Eric LaBrie, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC Address: 33400 8th Ave S, Suite 205 City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98003 Phone: 253-838-6113 Fax: 253-838-7104 Email: eric.labrie@esmcivil.com Signature: Owner Name: Tom Messmer c/o Federal Way Campus, LLC Address:1I100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 City/State: Los Angeles, CA Zip: 90025 Phone: (310) 261-4382 Fax: Email: tmessmer@industrialrealtygroup.com Signature: Page l of l k:lHandoutslMaster Land Use Application RECEIVED Lakehaven NOV 14 2V WATER & SEWER DISTRICT CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ;OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Lakehaven Water & Sewer District - Development Engineering Section 31623 - 1st Ave S * PO Box 4249 * Federal Way, WA 98063-4249 Telephone: 253-945-1581 or 253-945-1580 * Email: DE@Lakehaven.org This certificate is intended to provide the applicant, land use agencies &/or public health departments with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay, or deny, water service based upon capacity &/or supply limitations in Lakehaven's or Other Purveyor's system facilities. Proposed Land Use: ❑ Building Permit-SFR ❑ Building Permit-MFR ❑ Building Permit -Other ❑ Subdivision ❑ Short Subdivision M Binding Site Plan ❑ Rezone ® Boundary Line Adjustment ® Other (specify/describe) Land Use Process III IV ❑mmercial Tax Parcel Number(s): 162104-9013 -9030 -9o56 2-28500-0010 797820-0420 Site Address: 32901 We erhaeussr Wa S Ex. Bldg. Area to Remain: 468.457 sf New Bldg. Area Proposed: Ex. + 1,068,000 sf Lakehaven GIs Grid: L-09/L-10/M-09 Applicant's Name: Federal Way Campus, LLC WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION 1. ® Water service can be provided by service connection to an existing 12" diameter water mains that are on the site. 2. Z If additionai/onsite fire hydrant(s) required, water service for the site will require an improvement to Lakehaven's water distribution system of: ❑ a. feet of " diameter water main to reach the site; and/or ® b. The construction of a water distribution system on the site; and/or ❑ c. A major portion of Lakehaven's comprehensive water system plan would need to be implemented and/or constructed; and/or ® d. Other (describe): Lakehaven Developer Extension Acireern t required. 3. ® a. The existing water system is in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Water System Plan. ❑ b. The existing water system is not in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Water System Plan and an Amendment to this Plan will be required. This may cause a delay in issuance of land use approvals or permits. 4. ® a. The subject property is within the corporate limits of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of water service outside of Lakehaven's water service area. ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. S. Water service Is subject to: ® a. Payment of connection charges (to be determined by Lakehaven); ® b. Proof or reservation of easements) as required by Lakehaven; ❑ c. Other Comments/special conditions: Care shall be taken to avoid encroachMent upon existing water andlor sewer ma -ins, andlorassociated easement(s). on the site. The nearest fire hydrant are on the Property (as marked on map on the back of this page). System hydraulic model results (FF #227), at no less than 20 psi, indicate that Lakehaven's standard maximum allowable liquid velocity of 10 ft/s is exceeded at a fire flow rate above 5.200 GPM (approximate). This flow figure depicts the theoretical performance of the water distribution system under high demand conditions. Fire flow rates greater than this may be accommodated through water distribution system improvements, contact Lakehaven for additional information. 578 Pressure Zone Est. Meter Elevations)-GIS: 420-450 +/- Est. Pressure Range at Meter(s) (psi): Min. 52, Max. 74 I hereby certify that the above water system information is true. This certification shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of signature. Name: BRIAN ASBURY Signature: Title: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SUPERVIS0 1621049013 1621049030 1621049056 2285000010 7978200420 wtr.docx(Form Update 1/3/17) Date: 9 l ' 7 Page 1 of 2 1621049013 1621049030 1621049056 2285000010 7978200420 wtr.docx(Form Update 1/3/17) Page 2 of Lakehaven WATER & SEWER DISTRICT $EWER-CIERTTFICATE OF AV_AILABILIT'Y Lakehaven, Water & Sewer District - Development Engineering Section 31623 - 1st Ave S * PO Box 4249 * Federal Way, WA 98063-4249 Telephone: 253-945-1581 or 253-945-1580 * Email: DE@Lakehaven.org This certificate is intended to provide the applicant, land use agencies &/or public health departments with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay, or deny, sewer service based upon capacity &/or supply limitations in Lakehaven's or Other Purveyor's system facilities. Proposed Land Use: ❑ Building Permit-SFR ❑ Building Permit-MFR ❑ Building Permit -Other ❑ Subdivision ❑ Short Subdivision ED Binding Site Plan ❑ Rezone ® Boundary Line Adjustment ® Other (specify/describe) Land Use Process IIIJIV - Commercial Tax Parcel Number(s): 162104-90 3. -9030, -9056. 228540-0010,797820-0420 Site Address: 32901 Weyerhaeuser- Way S Ex. Bldg. Area to Remain: 468.457 sf New Bldg. Area Proposed: Ex. + 1.068 000 sf Lakehaven GIs Grid: L-09/L-10/M-09 Applicant's Name: Federal Wad_ Campus. LLC SEWER SYSTEM INFORMATION i. ® Sewer service can be provided by service connection to an existing private 8" diameter sewer main that is on parcels 1621049013 & 1621049030, or 24" or 30" sewer trunk on parcel 228SO00010 & in Weyerhaeuser Way S and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed land use. 2. ® For parcel 1621049056, sewer service For the site will require an Improvement to Lakehaven's sanitary sewer system of: 560+/-feet of 8" diameter sewer main or trunk to reach the site; and/or ❑ b. The construction of a sanitary sewer collection system on the site; and/or ❑ c. A major portion of Lakehaven's comprehensive wastewater system plan would need to be implemented and/or constructed; and/or ® d. Other (describe): Lakehaven DpvgJoper Extension Agreement reauired. 3. ® a. The existing sewer system is in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan. ❑ b. The existing sewer system is not in conformance wlth Lakehaven's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan and an Amendment to this Plan will be required. This may cause a delay in issuance of land use approvals or permits. 4. ® a. The proposed site land use is within the corporate limits of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of sewer service outside of Lakehaven's sewer service area. ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. S. Sewer service is subject to: ® a. Payment of connection charges (to be determined by Lakehaven); ® b. Proof or reservation of easement(s) as required by Lakehaven; ❑ c. Other Comments/special conditions: Care shall be taken t-o avpid encroachment upon existing water and/or sewer mains, and/or associated semen s on the sl I hereby certify that the above sewer system information is true. This certification shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of signature. Name: BRIAN ASBURY Title: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SUPS VISOR Signature: Date: 8/7,� 1621049013 1621049030 1621049056 2285000010 7978200420 swr.dooc (Form Update 1/3/17) Page 1 of 2 1621049013 1621049030 1621049056 2285000010 7978200420 swr.docx (Form Update 1/3/17) Page 2 of 2 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 16, 2017 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue Lindsey Sperry, Public Safety Officer Rob Van Orsow, Solid Waste/Recycling Coordinator FROM: Jim Harris FOR DRC MTG. ON: December 7, 2017 DATE - Internal FILE NUMBER(s): 17-105490-00-SE & 17-105489-UP PROJECT NAME: GREENLINE BUSINESS PARK PROJECT ADDRESS: 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South ZONING DISTRICT: CP-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review and UP 4 for development of (3) new warehouse buildings total approximately 1.1 million square feet. Reconfiguration and addition of associated parking spaces, ROW dedication and frontage improvements. Existing Greenline Technology Center will remain. LAND USE PERMITS. SEPA and Process 4 Hearing Examiner PROJECT CONTACT: ERIC LABRIE - ESM MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Master Land Use Application ESM Cover Letter 11/14/17 SEPA checklist Title Report Water and Sewer Avail letters Process 4 Plan set Stormwater TIR Trip Gen Memo Parking Study Critical Areas Report Geotech Report Pavement Analysis Tree Evaluation MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 2017 TO: Rick Perez / Sarady Long City of Federal Way FROM: Jeff Schramm TENW SUBJECT: Trip Generation Memo for the proposed IRG Greenline - Federal Way TENW Proiect #5219 VTENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest RRECE E CITY OF FEDERAL WAY GOMM1UNITY DEVELOPMENT This memorandum documents the trip generation estimate for the proposed IRG Greenline in Federal Way, WA and includes a project description and trip generation estimate. Project Description The project site is located on the west side of Weyerhaeuser Way S, east of 1-5, and north of the proposed IRG Warehouse A and Warehouse B developments. A vicinity map of the surrounding area is shown in Attachment A. The project includes the development of up to 1,068,000 square feet of warehouse building area. The existing site is vacant. Primary vehicular access is proposed at three locations along Weyerhaeuser Way S. Project buildout is expected in 2020. A preliminary site plan concept is shown in Attachment B. Trip Generation The trip generation estimate for the proposed IRG Greenline industrial development was based on methodology documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 91h edition for LUC 150 (Warehousing). Table 1 summarizes the total trip generation estimate. A detailed trip generation calculation can be found in Attachment C. Table 1 Trip Generation Summary New Trips Generated New Trips Generated Total New Trips iPASSENGER WEH)CLES (TRUCKS ONLY1 Generated ONLY) (ALL VEHICLES) Time Period In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Daily 1,511 1,512 3,023 378 378 756 1,889 1,890 3,779 AM Peak Hour 192 51 243 48 13 61 240 64 304 PM Peak Hour 55 162 217 13 41 54 68 203 271 As shown in Table 1, the IRG Greenline industrial development is estimated to generate 3,779 new weekday daily trips with 304 new trips during the weekday AM peak hour (240 in, 64 out) and 271 new trips during the weekday PM peak hour (68 in, 203 out). Transportation Planning j Design ) Traffic Impact & Operations 11400 SE 8m Street, Suite 200, Bellevue, WA 98004 1 Office (425) 889-6747 Trip Generation Memo IRG Greenrine If you have any questions regarding the information presented in this memo, please call me at (425) 250- 5001 or email me at schramm@tenw.com. cc Tom Messmer — IRG Eric LaBrie, ESM Consulting Engineers Jeff Haynie, P.E. — TENW Principal Attachments: A. Project Site Vicinity B. Preliminary Site Plan C. Trip Generation Calculation TE N W September 19, 2017 Page 2 37sSthPE.81 5lrlth 7 s 5 3: Gth at $'33 •� T ' d�,, _ Project =.f 7N 3aatn` nSite ^� -6 All #t� take � � psa+ders�:�.►�,� t, w • h�33fx � v � �1 �S j� ji �k � �' ; III• it��n - how �, i� / r Ol Al ls .. IL kkk �' - - rr , , cif ..�.- •,� ._... y, �.- �; 1y ''t .- • ,.� - •,: _ i � 17: AY�Y �J Y �''�' �111 ram• ya _ - i'• - . . . i6R N t Attachment B: Preliminary Site Plan Trip Generation Memo IRG Greenline NOT 10 -CAL I Trip Generation Memo IRG Greenline ATTACHMENT C Trip Generation Calculations §� 0 ƒ § § § 2 [ ] LO k } 2 f K cco Go $ ■ _ ± / \ \ \ 2f \ , ` k a ® \ § % § m $ I . . . � o � E 2 I 0 ; 2 } k 2 / \ , \ t [ [ I � § | ■ z f . \ \ / ) \ ) _ • w \ / / § , < < 0 CD k ■� Llu 13LD #� : z w � � O dah Allyson Brooks Ph.D., Director State Historic Preservation Officer October 31, 2017 Ms. Jean Parietti Save Weyerhaeuser Campus Federal Way, WA In future correspondence please refer to: Project Tracking Code: 2016-08-06001 Property: Weyerhaeuser Headquarters Re: DOE Dear Ms. Parietti Thank you for contacting the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) regarding the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters in Federal Way. Per your request I have reviewed the building for its eligibility for listing on National Register of Historic Places. While not yet 50 years old the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters would easily qualify for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (under criteria A & C) as a ground breaking design that has been studied by generations of architects, architectural historians, landscape architects and historians. In fact, the project's architectural achievements were acknowledged shortly after its completion when it received a 1972 National Honor Award from the American Institute of Architects (AIA); a distinction bestowed upon only the most respected architectural designs in the country. Thirty years later, recognizing the importance of the building, in 2001 the project received the AIA's Twenty-five Year Award, an honor that showcases buildings that set an architectural/design precedent. The project as a whole was a collaboration of the work of a virtual who's who of top-notch mid- century design firms including: the New York architectural firm of Skidmore Owings and Merrill (San Francisco Office, Edward C. Bassett, principle -in -charge) and the landscape architecture firm of Sasaki, Walker and Associates (Peter Walker, partner -in -charge). Other important collaborators included landscape architect Richard A. Vignolo (roof garden); landscape architect William Callaway (Sethar Memorial Garden); landscape architect Thomas L. Berger Associations (Pacific Rim Bonsai Collection); and space planners Sidney Rogers Associates. Completed in 1971, the 300,000 sq ft., $15 million dollar building housed nearly 900 managerial and administrative employees, including the company's executive group. The building used an open office landscape with furniture, dividers, and planters, rather than walls separating work areas. At the time of construction it was the first major corporate headquarters building in the United States to utilize this open office landscape treatment. Further innovations were found at the exterior walls of plate glass, which were cemented into single units with no vertical framing, providing the longest uninterrupted spans of glass exterior walls in the world at the time of construction. Custom office furniture, design by SOM and Knoll International of New York and then manufactured at Weyerhaeuser's Marshfield, Wisconsin hardwood plant. State of Washington • Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation P.O. Box 48343 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 • (360) 586-3065 www.dahp.wo.gov Specific details as to the boundaries of a listing would need to be defined after further study but most likely includes the full 260 acres as initially developed by Sasaki, Walker & Associates. In such a document various landscape elements and character defining features would be called out as contributing or non-contributing elements. The design firms were deliberate in their approach. They wanted the buildings to merge seamlessly into the landscape. Such elements included parking lot terraces which are found on each level of the building with its pedestrian circulation defined by formal rows of sycamore trees that contrasted with the indigenous forest beyond. The steep banks and building tiers were planted with English ivy. The clipped beds of ivy and carefully maintained lawns transition to plantings of ferns and rhododendrons and then to dogwoods and vine maples, all specifically planed out by the team. The surrounding forest was then purposefully sculpted, removing underbrush and creating woodland trails for the enjoyment of employees. We would welcome a National Register application for the building anytime. However keep in mind that per federal regulations, National Register listing requires owner consent. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Michael Houser State Architectural Historian (360) 586-3076 Michael,Houser(@dahp.wa.gov CC: Chris Moore, WA Trust for HP Eugenia Woo, Historic Seattle Stacey Welsh, City of Federal Way Jim Harris, City of Federal Way t STA State of Washington • Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation P.O. Box 48343 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 • (360) 586-3065 www.dahp.wo.gov 0 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 2017 TO: Rick Perez / Sarady Long City of Federal Way FROM: Jeff Schramm TENW SUBJECT: Trip Generation Memo for the proposed IRG Greenline — Federal Way TENW Project #5219 VTENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 0 14 2V C1C60MUWN Q04� 0pMeW This memorandum documents the trip generation estimate for the proposed IRG Greenline in Federal Way, WA and includes a project description and trip generation estimate. Project Description The project site is located on the west side of Weyerhaeuser Way S, east of 1-5, and north of the proposed IRG Warehouse A and Warehouse B developments. A vicinity map of the surrounding area is shown in Attachment A. The project includes the development of up to 1,068,000 square feet of warehouse building area. The existing site is vacant. Primary vehicular access is proposed at three locations along Weyerhaeuser Way S. Project buildout is expected in 2020. A preliminary site plan concept is shown in Attachment B. Trip Generation The trip generation estimate for the proposed IRG Greenline industrial development was based on methodology documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 96 edition for LUC 150 (Warehousing). Table 1 summarizes the total trip generation estimate. A detailed trip generation calculation can be found in Attachment C. Table 1 Trip Generation Summary New Trips Gen PASSENGER VEHICLES New Trios Generated (TRUCKS ONLY) Total New Trips Generated BALL VEHICLES) ONLY Time Period In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Daily 1,511 1,512 3,023 378 378 756 1,889 1,890 3,779 AM Peak Hour 192 51 243 48 13 61 240 64 304 PM Peak Hour 55 162 217 13 41 54 68 203 271 As shown in Table 1, the IRG Greenline industrial development is estimated to generate 3,779 new weekday daily trips with 304 new trips during the weekday AM peak hour (240 in, 64 out) and 271 new trips during the weekday PM peak hour (68 in, 203 out). Transportation Planning j Design j Traffic Impact & Operations 11400 SE 8m Street, Suite 200, Bellevue, WA 98004 1 Office (425) 889-6747 Trip Generation Memo IRG Greenfine If you have any questions regarding the information presented in this memo, please call me at (425) 250- 5001 or email me at schramm@tenw.com. cc: . Tom Messmer — IRG Eric LaBrie, ESM Consulting Engineers Jeff Haynie, P.E. — TENW Principal Attachments; A. Project Site Vicinity B. Preliminary,Site Plan C. Trip Generation Calculation %9 TE N W September 19, 2017 Page 2 _..ti .� . 3S$lh P fi-S7"�L • 5 �57th r • yt. _ .� ; ' I77 k Project vL Site Oct • h k III North �' ��1 �• �O st - �: A - • _ w� +&� --� .. 7c`� ° .. ..J ig .c., - A�Dl1•d i36t"r, $i J: 44 OV Afliagf IQ • �7 w . h;K S 3f4 -fl SR r! 5 3C,c7t1p t -_-� a � v irk— L :� � 4c .�, 'r. •"e"�,.� A fit; Sp gel too V — � Attachment B: Preliminary Site Plan Trip Generation Memo IRG Greenfine Trip Generation Memo IRG Greenline ATTACHMENT C Trip Generation Calculations 2� R a ) OL 2 m a r 4 _ G ■ } ; � 2 / ( e ■ g � \ ( ( $ ■ e e ~� \ \ \ § ( § ) 7 5 E _ \ ) � CR , ^ § § \ 2 @ ■ _ i f 2 \ } \ ! ` $ \ § I ■ � ! £ / < ± < ± e b /�� L,IER /,{\\/ {{ } C November 14, 2017 NG ENGINEERS, L Job No. 1886-001-016 AECEIVED Mr. Jim Harris Senior Planner NOV 112017 City of Federal Way Community Development Department CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33325 8th Avenue South COMMUN TY DEVELOPMENT Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Greenline Business Park, Process IV Land Use Application with SEPA Dear Mr. Harris: On behalf of Federal Way Campus, LLC, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC is pleased to submit a Process IV land use application with SEPA to the City of Federal Way for review and processing. Federal Way Campus, LLC is seeking to develop property surrounding the former Weyerhaeuser Technology Center, now referred to as the Greenline Technology Center located at 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way. The proposed development includes construction of 3 buildings of varying sizes totaling f1,068,000 sq. ft.; reconfiguration of, and addition to, the existing parking lot which surrounds the Greenline Technology Center; dedication and frontage improvements along Weyerhaeuser Way South and S 336th Street; as well as construction of five stormwater ponds. No development as part of this proposal will occur within 200 feet of the OHWM of North Lake. The proposed development will primarily occur on parcels 162104-9056, -9013, and -9030 while one of the proposed stormwater ponds for the project will be located on the east side of Weyerhaeuser Way South on Parcel 152104-9178. Please note that under a separate application we will be submitting one more Boundary Line Adjustment in order to adjust the boundary of parcel -9013 so that it is no longer bisected by the Weyerhaeuser Way South right-of-way. Design Narrative Federal Way Campus, LLC recognizes that the former Weyerhaeuser Campus consisted of properties "characterized by large contiguous sites with landscape, open space amenities, and buildings of superior quality." The Greenline Business Park seeks to continue that design intent by protecting large segments of open space such as the meadow on the north side of S 336th Street, forested areas behind the proposed buildings as shown on the included site plan, and through the enhancement of natural areas located between Weyerhaeuser Way South and North Lake. Additional open space is provided through the management of 50-foot and 100-foot wide managed forest buffers that run parallel to the ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 8th Ave S, Ste 205 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federal Way, WA 98003 253.838.6113tel Everett, WA 98208 425.297.9900tel 3DLaser Scanning GIS 800.345.5694 toll free 800.345.5694 toll free www.esmcivil.com 253.838.7104 fax 425. 297.9903. fax Mr. Jim Harris November 14, 2017 Page 2 northern site boundary and 1-5, respectively. Landscaping is provided around the proposed parking areas and in landscape islands throughout. The proposed buildings represent superior quality by the voluntary integration of many community design details as prescribed in FWRC 19.115. The proposed buildings incorporate fapade modulation, recessed windows, and large expanses of transparent glass similar to the Greenline Technology Center. None of the proposed buildings will exceed six stories; in fact the building height is proposed to be 42'-0". No blank walls exist on the proposed buildings as a combination of vertical banding, mountain reveal patterns, varying window shapes, trellis features and overhangs are incorporated into the design. Parking Modification Request Surrounding the buildings will be a total of 1,466 parking stalls and 111 trailer stalls. Pursuant to FWCC Sec 22-1397 Federal Way Campus, LLC is seeking a modification to the prescribed parking stall requirements outlined in the 1994 Zoning Code as modified by the provisions of Section XIII of the CP-01 Zoning Regulations. Included with this submittal is a Parking Analysis Memo which demonstrates that the parking need is less than the provided parking stall count. Request for Waiver of Submittal Requirement Some reports being required by the City submittal standards are unable to be provided until additional information is provided by the City of Federal Way. Currently, Federal Way Campus, LLC is waiting on the City of Federal Way Public Works Department for a scoping form which is required to conduct and complete the Traffic Impact Analysis and Traffic Concurrency Review. Air and Noise studies require the data from the Traffic Impact Analysis in order to conduct the necessary studies and complete the reports. Furthermore, the pre -application summary letter requested that Federal Way Campus, LLC provide a visual impact analysis and analysis per Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. More details which describe the scope of each analysis are required in order to provide reports which are responsive to the City of Federal Way requirements as well as the requirements of the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. We respectfully request that the review of the Process IV and SEPA application materials that are currently available are reviewed by the City until the necessary information is provided by the City. As a result, the following items are not included in this submittal; however, they will be included in a later submittal upon receipt of further information from the City: 1. Traffic Impact Analysis; 2. Environmental Noise Report; 3. Air Quality Technical Information Report; 4. Visual impact Analysis; and 5. Analysis per D.A.H.P. Requirements. Traffic/Circulation Access to this facility will be provided off of Weyerhaeuser Way South in four locations, 2 of which being approximately 40 feet in width to accommodate truck turning movements and the remaining two will be 30 feet wide to accommodate standard vehicles. The northernmost access has been located approximately 450 feet south of the northern property line as measured along the ROW. The second 40-foot wide access is proposed to be located near the current entrance to the northern parking lot of the WTC. This driveway will function as a shared access servicing both the proposed warehouse Jim Harris November 14, 2017 Page 3 buildings and the WTC property. Street frontage improvements will occur along the entire length of the project site on both Weyerhaeuser Way South and S 3361h Street. Dedications and improvements are required on both sides of these rights -of -way to accommodate provisions of "Arterial/Collector Section K" as noted in the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, revised 2015. Storm Stormwater runoff from the new development will be collected and routed to five separate stormwater treatment and detention facilities located around the project to reflect the existing stormwater basins. One stormwater pond will be located on Parcel No. 152104- 9178, which is east of Weyerhaeuser Way South. The outfall of this pond will be used to rehydrate the wetlands in this area. The remaining four ponds will be located southwest and southeast of the proposed buildings. Each pond is sized per the recently adopted, 2016 King County Stormwater Design Manual. After detention and treatment, stormwater will be released at pre -developed rates to the natural downstream drainage paths. Included with this Process IV and SEPA submittal are the following application materials: 1. Completed Master Land Use Application; 2. Application Fee (check for $5,989.28); 3. Pre -Application Summary Letter; 4. Title Report (2 copies); 5. Letters of Water and Sewer Availability (2 copies); 6. Site Photographs (8 copies); 7. Signed and Completed SEPA Checklist (8 copies); 8. Process IV Plan Set (8 copies); 9. Preliminary Technical Information Report (4 copies); 10. Trip Generation Memo (4 copies); 11. Parking Study (4 copies); 12. Critical Areas Report and Conceptual Mitigation Plan (4 copies); and 13. Geotechnical Report (4 copies); 14. Pavement analysis (4 copies) 15. Evaluation of trees (4 copies) If you have any questions or require further information, please contact me immediately via email or phone at 253-838-6113. Sincerely, E4rE LTIN NGINEERS, LLC Assistant Planner Enc: As Noted CC: Tom Messmer, Federal Way Campus, LLC Jack McCullough, McCullough Hill Learly PS Ilesm8lengrlesm-jobs1188610011016-00161documentlletter-003.dou TO: FROM: RE: JOB #: DATE: Feder Bth Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way. WA 98003 f` MEMORANDUM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MATT REIDER PARKING ANALYSIS 1886-001-016-0016 NOVEMBER 10, 2017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY QEVELOPMENT This Memo documents the parking analysis for the Greenline Business Park development. Project Description The proposal for Greenline Business Park seeks to develop 3 new buildings of varying sizes (1,068,000 SF of new GFA). The Greenline Technology Center (1,327,500 SF) will remain; however, the parking lot associated with the Tech Center will be reconfigured to allow for construction of the new buildings. Building A will be 638,000 SF in size, Building B will be 282,500 SF in size, and Building C will be 147,500 SF in size. City of Federal Way Code -Required Parking City of Federal Way code -required off-street parking is based on 1994 Zoning Code as modified by the provisions of Section XIII of the CP-01 Zoning Regulations, and requires the following: 1 stall per 1,000 SF warehouse Based on the included site plan with a combined total of 2,395,500 square feet of commercial space on the Greenline Business Park site, the applicant is required to provide 2,396 code required stalls. The current site plan is providing 1,466 car parking stalls and 111 trailer parking stalls for a combined total of 1,577 off-street parking stalls. Parking Demand The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation manual, 4th Edition was used to provide parking information for this specific parking study. The ITE Parking Generation manual for the industrial land uses provides parking demand rates and equations to estimate parking demand. ITE practices dictate the use of the equation when a minimum amount of studies is provided and the data points represent a trend in parking demand as building area increases. In the case of the `warehouse" category, the equation best represents parking demand. No office space was calculated to be a part of the proposal as an accurate representation cannot be provided until a tenant has been identified. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Project Management • Public Works • Land Planning • Landscape Architecture Phone 253.838.6113 800.345-5694 Fax 253.838.7104 Parking Code Comparison to Demand A comparison of minimum parking requirements for the proposed Preferred Freezer development based on Federal Way City Code requirements (Section 18A35.040), and information provided in the ITE Parking Generation manual, are shown below in Table 1. Table 1 - City of Federal Way ITE Parking Generation Land Use Size Units ITE WC Code Warehouse 2,395,500 GFA 150 1:1,000 SF TOTAL 2,395,550 1. ITE Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition, 2010. LU Minimum Estimated Parking Parking Required Rate Demand 2,396 Equation' 981 2,396 981 150 Equation= 0.41 x(2,395,500)-1 As shown in Table 1, the Greenline Business Park development is estimated to have an estimated parking demand (981 stalls) that would be accommodated by the proposed parking supply (1,577 stalls) despite providing parking that is less than City minimum code requirements. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Project Management • Public Works • Land Planning • Landscape Architecture Phone 253.838.6113 800.345-5694 Fax 253.838.7104 SUBDIVISION Issued By: i lI CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY `- r Guarantee/Certificate Number: 0105958-16 Revision 2nd dbarantee CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further information as to the availability and cost. Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98104 ^A Countersigned By: Q� '� SEA.I,.Y Authorized Officer or Agent Chicago Title Insurance Company By: Attest: President Secretary 17- 145489 RESUBMITTED NOV 16 2017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 1 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Liability $1,000.00 /�) GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 REVISION 2nd Guarantee tSSUINGOFFI. Title Officer: Seattle Builder / Unit 16 Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206)628-5623 Main Phone: (206)628-5623 Email: CTISeattleBuilderUnit@ctt.com Effective Date: November 8, 2017 at 08:00 AM The assurances referred to on the face page are: SCHEDULE A iP'tum Tax $350.00 $35.35 That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matter relative to the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Title to said real property is vested in: Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. END OF SCHEDULE A Subdivislon GuaranteelCertifleate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 2 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Parcel A: Lots 1, 2, and 3, City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-000455-SU, as recorded under recording no. 20171108900002, in King County, Washington. Parcel B: Together with Lot 1, City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-000484-SU, as recorded under recording no. 20171103900001, in Bing County, Washington. Parcel F: BEGINNING 20 FEET EAST OF THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 468.34 FEET; THENCE EAST 183.95 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO LAKE; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG LAKE 1220 FEET TO POINT ON THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 1160.31 FEET EAST OF THE WEST QUARTER CORNER; THENCE WEST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30 FEET; THENCE EAST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1030.33 FEET; THENCE WEST 1133.37 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF A COUNTY ROAD (32ND AVENUE SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ROAD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORE LANDS ADJACENT; AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF GAME UNDER RECORDING NO. 8204160626; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY, SOUTHERLY LINE OF 32ND DRIVE SOUTH (ALSO KNOWN AS W EYERHAUSER WAY SOUTH) AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1978 UNDER RECORDING NO. 7809150862; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 200 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W M, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON NORTH LAKE ON THE EAST -WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 15 DISTANT NORTH 890 12' EAST 1160.31 FEET FROM THE WEST QUARTER CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 890 12' WEST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 000 4T WEST 30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 890 12' EAST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 000 4T WEST TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2 DISTANT NORTH 890 13' EAST 1163.37 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTH AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTH AND NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF GAME UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8204160626; Subdivision Guaranteelcetfi to Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 3 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WEST OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF 32ND DRIVE SOUTH (ALSO KNOWN AS WEYERHAUSER WAY SOUTH); TOGETHER WITH (A) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 890 12' EAST ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION, 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 000 45' EAST, PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 468.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00* 45' EAST 33.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 55' EAST 175 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 890 55' WEST; THENCE NORTH 890 55' WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORE LANDS ADJACENT; (B) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 89° 12' EAST, ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 000 45' EAST PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 501.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00° 45' EAST 33.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 55' EAST TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 890 55' WEST; THENCE NORTH 890 55' WEST 175 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORE LANDS ADJOINING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 890 12' EAST ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION, 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 45' EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION, 535.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00 45' EAST 33.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 55' EAST 124.55 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 890 55' WEST; Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 4 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description THENCE NORTH 89' 55' WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THE SHORELANDS OF THE SECOND CLASS FRONTING THEREON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. $407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH THE SHORELANDS OF THE SECOND CLASS LYING IN FRONT THEREOF; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 890 12, EAST ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION, 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 000 45' EAST PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION, 568.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 000 45' EAST 50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 55' EAST 83.25 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE LINE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 69° 55' WEST; THENCE NORTH 890 55' WEST 124.55 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH SHORE LANDS OF THE 2ND CLASS LYING IN FRONT OF, ADJACENT TO OR ABUTTING THEREON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15, RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 0° 53- 59" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT, 618.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00 53' 59" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2,147.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 840 20' 12" EAST, 75 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SHORE LINE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE LINE TO A POINT THAT BEARS SOUTH 890 55' EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 890 55' WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16, RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 00 53' 59" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, 668.34 FEET TO MEANDER CORNER ON NORTH LAKE, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00 53' 59" WEST, 97.5 FEET; THENCE NORTH 840 20' 12" WEST 30.1 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0' 53' 59" EAST 145 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 06' 01" EAST 30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 53' 59" WEST 50 FEET TO MEANDER CORNER AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. GuaranteelcerlfriCate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09 17 AM Page 5 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARANI�ICERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS H. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. Subdivision GuaranteelGertlficate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 ANi Page 6 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622461-SPS-1-17-010595E-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS GUARANI a /CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 REVISION 2nd Guarantee Notice of additional water or sewer facility tap or connection charge, filed by Federal Way Water and Sewer District under recording number 8905120210. Affects: All Parcels 2. Easement rights and maintenance agreements, if any, for utilities which may have been granted in vacated streets and alleys prior to the vacations. Affects: All Parcels Landscape areas as disclosed on King County Assessor's Map. Affects: Parcel B 4. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on State Plat in Section 16, Township 21N, R. 4E, Volume 41, Page 30. Affects: Parcel B 5. Provisions in King County Superior Court Cause No. 385515 filed June 25, 1947 fixing the level of North Lake. Affects: Parcel F 6. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 2648274 Affects: Parcel F 7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Puget Sound Power & Light Purpose: Electric Transmission and/or distribution lines Recording Date: June 27, 1931 Recording No.: 2678839 Affects: Parcels A & F Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 7 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARAN'i 1 /CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Puget Sound Power & Light Purpose: Electric Transmission and/or distribution lines Recording Date: October 19, 1934 Recording No.: 2825254 Affects: Parcel F 9. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oii, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4045871 Affects: Parcel B 10. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4381073 Affects: Parcel B 11. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4381075 Affects: Parcel B 12. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4778515 Affects: Parcel B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 8 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARANI -c/CERTIFICATE NO. 0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 13. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4980400 Affects: Parcel A 14, Relinquishment of access to State Highway Number 1 and of light, view and air by Deed: Grantee: State of Washington Recording Date: December 29, 1958 Recording No.: 4980491 Affects: Parcel B 15. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5020234 Affects: Parcel B 16. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5073868 Afffects: Parcel B 17. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5208159 Affects: Parcel B 18. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Washington Natural Gas Purpose: gas pipelines Recording Date: August 13, 1963 Recording No.: 5623093 Affects: Parcel B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11,14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 9 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARANI/CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 19. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5628306 Affects: Parcel B 20. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: June 2, 1964 Recording No.: 5743180 Affects: Parcel B 21. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: July 23, 1964 Recording No.: 5765326 Affects: Parcel B 22. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: July 23, 1964 Recording No.: 5765327 Affects: Parcel B 23. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: September 11, 1964 Recording No.: 5785334 Affects: Parcel B 24. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted or reserved in deed In favor of: King County Recording Date: February 25, 1969 Recording No.: 6475093 Affects: Parcel B GuaranteelCertificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 10 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARAN'6 -c/CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 25. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipeline Company Purpose: Transmission of petroleum products Recording Date: September 22, 1969 Recording No.: 6567596 Affects: Parcels A & B 26. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: King County Water District No. 100 Purpose: Water mains Recording Date: April 8, 1971 Recording No.: 7104080368 Affects: Parcel B 27. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, gender expression, medical condition or genetic information, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document Recording Date: March 22, 1973 Recording No.: 7303220472 Affects: Parcel B 28. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted or reserved in deed In favor of: King County Recording Date: September 15, 1978 Recording No.: 7809150862 Affects: Parcels A. B, & F 29. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Water District No. 124 Purpose: water lines Recording Date: July 8, 1980 Recording No.: 8007080485 Affects: Parcels A & F 30. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Sewer District Purpose: Sewer Mains Recording Date: October 14, 1980 Recording No.: 8010140816 Affects: Parcel A Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 11 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARANI )/CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 31. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as reserved in a document; Reserved by: Weyerhaeuser Company Purpose: right to use access road, permanent gate, and right to lock said gate Recording Date: April 16, 1982 Recording No.: 8204160626 Affects: Parcel F Said instrument also provides the State of Washington, Department of Game an easement to manage and maintain an area for public fishing bank. 32. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted or reserved in deed In favor of: King County Recording Date: June 6, 1984 Recording No.: 8406060941 Affects: Parcel B 33. A document entitled "Agreement" executed by and between Federal Way Water and Sewer District and Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Compnay for construction of water mains and appurtenances recorded December 28, 1980 under recording number 9012281463. Affects: Parcel B 34. Terms and provisions contained in the document entitiled "Agreement" between Federal Way Water and Sewer District and Weyerhaeuser Company, regarding construction of sewer facilities recorded February 16, 1994 under recording number 9402182159. The lien created in paragraph 26 of said agreement was released by instrument recorded under recording no. 9512261712. Affects: All Parcels 35. Terms and conditions of Federal Way Ordinance No. 94-219 recorded under recording no. 9410260933. Said ordinance was modified by instrument recorded under recording no. 20030513002214. Affects: All Parcels 36. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District Purpose: Sewers Recording Date: December 14, 1995 Recording No.: 9512140223 & 951214224 Affects: Parcel B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page {{Page}} WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARAN'i .. /CERTIFICATE NO. 0105958-16 REVISION 2nd Guarantee 37. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. BLA 99-0002: Recording No: 9905129004 Affects: Parcel A 38. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District Purpose: Sewer facilities Recording Date: September 3, 1999 Recording No.: 19990903000827 Affects: Parcels A, B, & F 39. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District Purpose: Sewer facilities Recording Date: September 3, 1999 Recording No.: 19990903000829 Affects: Parcel F 40. Any prohibition or limitation of use, occupancy, or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any portion which is now or has been formerly covered by water. Affects: Parcel F 41. Paramount rights and easements in favor of the United States for commerce, navigation, fisheries and the production of power. Affects: Parcel F 42. Any unrecorded leaseholds, right of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon the Land and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the terms. Subdivision Guarantee(Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page {{Page}} WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARAN'i _010ERTIFICATE NO. 0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 43. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: Tax Account No.: Levy Code: Assessed Value -Land: Assessed Value -Improvements General and Special Taxes: Billed: Paid: Unpaid: Affects: 2017 797820-0420-01 1205 $3,300,100.00 $0.00 $45,980.02 $45,980.02 $0.00 Portion of Parcel B and other property 44. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 228500-0010-00 Levy Cade: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $4,510,400.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $62,843.82 Paid: $62,843.82 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Remainder of Parcel B and other property 45. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 162104-9056-07 Levy Cade: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $6,275,200.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: Paid: Unpaid: Affects: $87,431.70 $87,431.70 $0.00 Portion of Parcel A Subdivision GL;araniee.rCer iliCate Printed: 11.14.17 ®09:17 AM Page {{Page}} WA-CT-FNSE•02150.622481-SP5-1-17-0105958-16 GUARANI.-EXERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 46. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 162104-9013-09 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $7,060,600.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $41,366,700.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $661,872.60 Paid: $661,872.60 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Portion of Parcel A 47. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 162104-9030-08 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $326,700.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes Billed: $4,653.52 Paid: $4,653.52 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Remainder of Parcel A 48. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 152104-9178-01 Levy Codes 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $4,773,700.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $.82,800.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $67,764.31 Paid: $67,764.31 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Parcel F Subdivision Guarantee CertifLCe[e Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page (fPage)} WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARAN'i -c/CERTIFICATE NO. 0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 49. A Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing: Amount: $25,000,000.00 Dated: February 9, 2016 Trustor/Grantor: Federal Way Campus, LLC, A Delaware limited liability company Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation Beneficiary: CPIF Lending LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company Recording Date: February 9, 2016 Recording No: 20160209001434 Affects: All Parcels and other property 50. A financing statement as follows: Debtor: Federal Way Campus, LLC Secured Party: CPIF Lending, LLC Recording Date: February 9, 2016 Recording No.: 20160209001435 Affects: All Parcels and other property 51. Survey matters as disclosed by recital in deed recorded under recording no. 20160209001433. 52. Terms and conditions of the Limited Liability Company Agreement for the Limited Liability Company under which title is vested. 53. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-000484-SU: Recording No: 20171103900001 Affects: Parcel B 54. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-000455-SU: Recording No: 20171108900002 Affects: Parcel A END OF EXCEPTIONS Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page {{Page}} WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARANI c/CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) NOTES The following matters will not be listed as Special Exceptions in Schedule B of the policy. There will be no coverage for loss arising by reason of the matters listed below because these matters are either excepted or excluded from coverage or are not matters covered under the insuring provisions of the policy. Note A: Note: Any map furnished with this Gurantee is for convenience in locating the land indicated herein with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance thereon. END OF NOTES END OF SCHEDULE B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page {{Page}} WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 SUBDIVISION Issued By: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY o- Guarantee/Certificate Number: 0105958-16 Revision 2nd Guarantee CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability arnaunt set forth in Schedule A. Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the speck assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further information as to the availability and cost. Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98104 Countersigned By: pr6R, f SEAL - Authorized Officer or Agent Chicago Title Insurance Company By: Attest: A� President ti- Secretary 17--10548V RESUBMITTED NOV 16 2017 CfTY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNr Y DEVELOPMENT Suhdi�ision GuaranleelCertiTeate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 1 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ISSUING OFFICE: GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0105958-16 REVISION 2nd Guarantee Title Officer: Seattle Builder / Unit 16 Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206)628-5623 Main Phone: (206)628-5623 Email: CnSeattleBuilderUnit_@ctt.com SCHEDULE A Liability Premium Tax $1,000.00 $350.00 $35.35 Effective Date: November 8, 2017 at 08:00 AM The assurances referred to on the face page are: That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matter relative to the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Title to said real property is vested in: Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. END OF SCHEDULE A Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Prinled: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 2 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Parcel A: Lots 1, 2, and 3, City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-000455-SU, as recorded under recording no. 20171108900002, in King County, Washington. Parcel B: Together with Lot 1, City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-000484-SU, as recorded under recording no. 20171103900001, in King County, Washington. Parcel F: BEGINNING 20 FEET EAST OF THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 468.34 FEET; THENCE EAST 183.95 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO LAKE; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG LAKE 1220 FEET TO POINT ON THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 1160.31 FEET EAST OF THE WEST QUARTER CORNER; THENCE WEST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30 FEET; THENCE EAST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1030.33 FEET; THENCE WEST 1133.37 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF A COUNTY ROAD (32ND AVENUE SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ROAD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORE LANDS ADJACENT; AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF GAME UNDER RECORDING NO.8204160626; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY, SOUTHERLY LINE OF 32ND DRIVE SOUTH (ALSO KNOWN AS WEYERHAUSER WAY SOUTH) AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1978 UNDER RECORDING NO. 7809150862; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 200 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W M, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON NORTH LAKE ON THE EAST -WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 15 DISTANT NORTH 890 12' EAST 1160.31 FEET FROM THE WEST QUARTER CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 890 12' WEST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 000 4T WEST 30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 890 12' EAST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 000 4T WEST TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2 DISTANT NORTH 890 13, EAST 1163.37 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTH AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTH AND NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF GAME UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8204160626; Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 3 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WEST OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF 32ND DRIVE SOUTH (ALSO KNOWN AS WEYERHAUSER WAY SOUTH); TOGETHER WITH (A) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 890 12, EAST ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION, 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 45' EAST, PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 468.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00* 45' EAST 33.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 55' EAST 175 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 890 55' WEST; THENCE NORTH 890 55' WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORE LANDS ADJACENT; (B) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 89° 12, EAST, ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 000 45' EAST PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 501.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 000 45' EAST 33.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 55' EAST TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 890 55' W EST; THENCE NORTH 890 55' WEST 175 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORE LANDS ADJOINING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 890 12' EAST ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION, 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 45' EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION, 535.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00 45' EAST 33.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 55' EAST 124.55 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 890 55' WEST; Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 Q 08:17 AM Page 4 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description THENCE NORTH 89° 55' WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THE SHORELANDS OF THE SECOND CLASS FRONTING THEREON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO, 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH THE SHORELANDS OF THE SECOND CLASS LYING IN FRONT THEREOF; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 890 12, EAST ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION, 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 000 45' EAST PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION, 568.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 000 45' EAST 50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 55' EAST 83.25 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE LINE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 69° 55' WEST; THENCE NORTH 890 55' WEST 124.55 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH SHORE LANDS OF THE 2ND CLASS LYING IN FRONT OF, ADJACENT TO OR ABUTTING THEREON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15, RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 0° 53' 59" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT, 618.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00 53' 59" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2,147.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 840 20' 12" EAST, 75 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SHORE LINE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE LINE TO A POINT THAT BEARS SOUTH 890 55' EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 890 55' WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16, RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 00 53' 59" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, 668.34 FEET TO MEANDER CORNER ON NORTH LAKE, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00 53' 59" WEST, 97.5 FEET; THENCE NORTH 840 20' 12" WEST 30.1 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 53' 59" EAST 145 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 06' 01" EAST 30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 53' 59" WEST 50 FEET TO MEANDER CORNER AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Suhdivlsion Guarantee/Certifi-ate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09.17 ASS Page 5 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS GUARAN'i E/CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 REVISION 2nd Guarantee H. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 6 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS GUARANI K-t/CERTIFICATE NO. 0105958-16 REVISION 2nd Guarantee 1. Notice of additional water or sewer facility tap or connection charge, filed by Federal Way Water and Sewer District under recording number 8905120210. Affects: All Parcels 2. Easement rights and maintenance agreements, if any, for utilities which may have been granted in vacated streets and alleys prior to the vacations. Affects: All Parcels 3. Landscape areas as disclosed on King County Assessor's Map. Affects: Parcel B 4. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on State Plat in Section 16, Township 21N, R. 4E, Volume 41, Page 30. Affects: Parcel B 5. Provisions in King County Superior Court Cause No. 385515 filed June 25, 1947 fixing the level of North Lake. Affects: Parcel F 6. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 2648274 Affects: Parcel F 7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Puget Sound Power & Light Purpose: Electric Transmission and/or distribution lines Recording Date: June 27, 1931 Recording No.: 2678839 Affects: Parcels A & F Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 7 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARAN' E/CERTIFICATE NO. 0105958-16 REVISION 2nd Guarantee 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Puget Sound Power & Light Purpose: Electric Transmission and/or distribution lines Recording Date: October 19, 1934 Recording No.: 2825254 Affects: Parcel F 9. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4045871 Affects: Parcel B 10. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4381073 Affects: Parcel B 11. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4381075 Affects: Parcel B 12. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4778515 Affects: Parcel B GuaranteelCertiScate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 WN Page 8 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARAN'i cE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 13. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4980400 Affects: Parcel A 14. Relinquishment of access to State Highway Number 1 and of light, view and air by Deed: Grantee: State of Washington Recording Date: December 29, 1958 Recording No.: 4980491 Affects: Parcel B 15. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5020234 Affects: Parcel B 16. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5073868 Afffects: Parcel B 17. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5208159 Affects: Parcel B 18. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Washington Natural Gas Purpose: gas pipelines Recording Date: August 13, 1963 Recording No.: 5623093 Affects: Parcel B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 9 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARAN'i ECERTIFICATE NO. 0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 19. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5628306 Affects: Parcel B 20. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: June 2, 1964 Recording No.: 5743180 Affects: Parcel B 21. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: July 23, 1964 Recording No.: 5765326 Affects: Parcel B 22. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: July 23, 1964 Recording No.: 5765327 Affects: Parcel B 23. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: September 11, 1964 Recording No.: 5785334 Affects: Parcel B 24. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted or reserved in deed In favor of: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: SUbdivision King County February 25, 1969 6475093 Parcel B Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 10 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARANI c-t/CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 REVISION 2nd Guarantee 25. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipeline Company Purpose: Transmission of petroleum products Recording Date: September 22, 1969 Recording No.: 6567596 Affects: Parcels A & B 26. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: King County Water District No. 100 Purpose: Water mains Recording Date: April 8, 1971 Recording No.: 7104080368 Affects: Parcel B 27. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, gender expression, medical condition or genetic information, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document 28. 29. Kill Recording Date: March 22, 1973 Recording No.: 7303220472 Affects: Parcel B Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted or reserved in deed In favor of: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: King County September 15, 1978 7809150862 Parcels A, B, & F Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Water District No. 124 Purpose: water lines Recording Date: July 8, 1980 Recording No.: 8007080485 Affects: Parcels A & F Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Sewer District Purpose: Sewer Mains Recording Date: October 14, 1980 Recording No.: 8010140816 Affects: Parcel A Subdivision Guarantee/Certftate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page 11 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARANI .�.l /CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 REVISION 2nd Guarantee 31. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as reserved in a document; Reserved by: Weyerhaeuser Company Purpose: right to use access road, permanent gate, and right to lock said gate Recording Date: April 16, 1982 Recording No.: 8204160626 Affects: Parcel F Said instrument also provides the State of Washington, Department of Game an easement to manage and maintain an area for public fishing bank. 32. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted or reserved in deed In favor of: King County Recording Date: June 6, 1984 Recording No.: 8406060941 Affects: Parcel B 33. A document entitled "Agreement' executed by and between Federal Way Water and Sewer District and Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Compnay for construction of water mains and appurtenances recorded December 28, 1980 under recording number 9012281463. Affects: Parcel B 34. Terms and provisions contained in the document entitiled "Agreement' between Federal Way Water and Sewer District and Weyerhaeuser Company, regarding construction of sewer facilities recorded February 18, 1994 under recording number 9402182159. The lien created in paragraph 26 of said agreement was released by instrument recorded under recording no. 9512261712. Affects: All Parcels 35. Terms and conditions of Federal Way Ordinance No. 94-219 recorded under recording no. 9410260933. Said ordinance was modified by instrument recorded under recording no. 20030513002214. Affects: All Parcels 36. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District Purpose: Sewers Recording Date: December 14, 1995 Recording No.: 9512140223 & 951214224 Affects: Parcel B GuaranteelGerlificate Pr n[ed 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page {{Page}} WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARAN`i EICERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 REVISION 2nd Guarantee 37. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. BLA 99-0002: Recording No: 9905129004 Affects: Parcel A 38. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District Purpose: Sewer facilities Recording Date: September 3, 1999 Recording No.: 19990903000827 Affects: Parcels A, B, & F 39. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District Purpose: Sewer facilities Recording Date: September 3, 1999 Recording No.: 19990903000829 Affects: Parcel F 40, Any prohibition or limitation of use, occupancy, or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any portion which is now or has been formerly covered by water. Affects: Parcel F 41. Paramount rights and easements in favor of the United States for commerce, navigation, fisheries and the production of power. Affects: Parcel F 42. Any unrecorded leaseholds, right of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon the Land and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the terms. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page {{Page)) WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARANI —�c-/CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 43. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 797820-0420-01 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $3,300,100.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes Billed: $45,980.02 Paid: $45,980.02 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Portion of Parcel B and other property 44. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 228500-0010-00 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $4,510,400.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes Billed: $62,843.82 Paid: $62,843.82 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Remainder of Parcel B and other property 45. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 162104-9056-07 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $6,275,200.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $87,431.70 Paid: $87,431.70 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Portion of Parcel A Subdivision GuaranteelCertificale Primed: 11.14.17 C 09 17 AM Page {{Page}} WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARAN i -E/CERTIFICATE NO. 0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 46. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 162104-9013-09 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $7,060,600.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $41,366,700.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $661,872.60 Paid: $661,872.60 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Portion of Parcel A 47. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts d❑ not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 162104-9030-08 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $326,700.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: Paid: Unpaid: Affects: $4, 653.52 $4,653.52 $0.00 Remainder of Parcel A 48. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 152104-9178-01 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $4,773,700.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $82,800.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $67,764.31 Paid: $67,764.31 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Parcel F Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page {{Page}} WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622461-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 r^\ GUARANI �c"/CERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 49. A Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing: Amount: $25,000,000.00 Dated: February 9, 2016 Trustor/Grantor: Federal Way Campus, LLC, A Delaware limited liability company Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation Beneficiary: CPIF Lending LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company Recording Date: February 9, 2016 Recording No: 20160209001434 Affects: All Parcels and other property 50. A financing statement as follows: Debtor: Federal Way Campus, LLC Secured Party: CPIF Lending, LLC Recording Date: February 9, 2016 Recording No.: 20160209001435 Affects: All Parcels and other property 51. Survey matters as disclosed by recital in deed recorded under recording no. 20160209001433. 52. Terms and conditions of the Limited Liability Company Agreement for the Limited Liability Company under which title is vested. 53. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-000484-SU: Recording No: 20171103900001 Affects: Parcel B 54. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-000455-SU: Recording No: 20171108900002 Affects: Parcel A END OF EXCEPTIONS Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page {{Page}} WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 GUARANI "EICERTIFICATE NO.0105958-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 2nd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) NOTES The following matters will not be listed as Special Exceptions in Schedule B of the policy. There will be no coverage for loss arising by reason of the matters listed below because these matters are either excepted or excluded from coverage or are not matters covered under the insuring provisions of the policy. Note A: Note: Any map furnished with this Gurantee is for convenience in locating the land indicated herein with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance thereon. END OF NOTES END OF SCHEDULE B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 11.14.17 @ 09:17 AM Page {{Page}} WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0105958-16 Com --A Site Photos Reference Map King County i Map Greenline Business Park Iry 1.0 North 1. North 2 - �.. + ' ;, � . � AR-1, t7. f _r • 4. 1 �•{•�' , .Y.�,: •ice,% M.G - h• •, r ---��. yr:' - - •��n. r•� T- ..�4..r it JV_4zL �Y # 7 v . � `. �} -� a ARC f 1 `•' '1. _ r A fie' G ki WOW . f f �� • T � Y�' •� J • x. •�- East �• rr�h..-- 1 l _ it r r, 1` F 4• �. � , •,�� C. ff.�� '"��'� � i ►'' � � . � 3• '� �� r X �•� �"�• %ti.• + ♦ Its . r':a �• 1 ,f _ i- l South ip } a t �;. ..'r � �'Ji` _. _ .• r. •+ �� _ •l .. 1P' � ,1 i-_iFL�l�y �_ •� -. 7�,��• � �-� i T-v �yr� The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change without notice. King County Date: 8/22/2017 kgKingCouffty makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a survey product. King County shall not be liable for any general• special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, Ur-r-tut' 3 1WAY GIS CENTER but not limited to. lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on UNF Y DEVELOPMENT this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County. Notes: a. x• �' N '7; rlt(OL ,.>�• AR 4r may. IWO • .c• � -.:tip.- _ :. �; ,;�.�� _ '� '��. • Y-. y , ti - +. .:fir q' - - L � -,{l raI d. 1 i ��•� ",:[ sa le ILI nli �. -f K! � 'r, r�Ay: =far •f%.... ^�+ '1t�r �..7� ` � - - � .X ice+ �:..'fi: 1 •#Yri ' 1 ., . ti� jv r r .r '� ..R' •4 •[' � -n 2[ ••,Y .... ' ru' ',�'c • �Y'. f� Y[�.. .4 � r y4 F.�� ^� 1 � IPA Arm ' ' ;+�'!r • � 1 ,awl �'.' J tw _ • 1 � fa.�rwn.lwrwglne 1 =• � tg • mow. AOW3 4 r > ■ow a GREELINE BUSINESS PARK SOUTH �.i.• �, gyp, •1 ,p f' y ti _ .. • : r } .. . rNI r f' a �:'F• - ... -°I(r. '. \.'." Y+" �k�� •!• . Y•'V�.�`ti $iF�w •i.' •��Yr � 1'Rr ♦� �� j �. * 00, I- lKr Y Y;� �:.- 1'' �-`. ��' i�hr,�.�.��..•„w may •". t. ""• 4'J it -�"yS 4 ,"'• r- �.h' '7 � - - lit :� *C�i��1 `•' `i yy 14 ilk :.. _ ... _ x .'.'f CC+ •�jY`. .-i tip, � �• 'ice' ji - -" E • �F iry T' Department of Community Development Services 33325 8"' Avenue South CITY OF y`"ZA `" RECEIVED Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 "� 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 FederalWay NOV14 2017 www.cityoffaderalway.com CITY OF FEDEP l.. WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOQMEN i SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of cbeckfist• Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization, or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts, or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instmaionsforapplicantr h�l This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain whyit does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies and/or reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process, as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts ofyour proposa4 even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencze : Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal, and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first, but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for wnpmjeet proposaly: Zel For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans, and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B, plus the SUT'PI.i :i11:N 1_1I. ST 1I :1X FOR Ni)Nl'ItC]Ji :C:1' .V i'1[ ]NK {� t Dom. Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for nonprojects) questions in Part B (Environmental Elements) that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 1 of 14 k:\TTandouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 A. BACKGROUND el 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Vielo "Greenline Business Park" 2. Name of applicant: Vielo Applicant: Federal Way Campus, LLC Agent ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: D1g1PJ Applicant: Tom Messmer c/o Federal Way Campus, LLC Address: 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 Los Angeles, CA 90025 310-261-4382 Agent: Eric LaBrie c/o ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC Address: 33400 81h Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 838-6113 4. Date checklist prepared: h�j November 10, 2017 5. Agency requesting checklist: DLelpl City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):D—iellpj Land Use Process Approval Winter 2018 Ground Work Spring 2018 Construction Summer 2018 Completion Summer 2019 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. DLe1W No this proposal is a single project that will not require future additions, or further activity outside of building construction. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. h�� • Evaluation of Trees by Brian Gilles Consulting, dated 9/20/17; • Title Report by Chicago Title, dated 8/8/2017; • Wetland Delineation and Mitigation Report by Talasaea, dated 10/27/17, • Geotechnical Report by GeoEngineers, dated 9/19/17; • Pavement Analysis by GeoEngineers, dated 8/29/17; • Noise Study to be completed by Ramboll Environ; • Air Quality Report to be completed by Ramboll Environ; • Transportation Impact Analysis to be completed by TENW; • Trip Generation Report by TENW, dated 9/19/17; Bullctin #050 —May 1, 2014 Page 2 of 14 k:\Handouts\Hnvironmental Checklist May 2014 ® Preliminary Technical Information Report addressing relevance of the 9 Core and 5 Special Requirements of 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual by ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, dated 9/20/17. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. VLelw An administrative decision has been applied for with the City of Federal Way to authorize underbrush removal on portions of the property of which the proposed Greenline Business Park is located. A Joint Aquatic Resource Permit Application has also been submitted to USACE and DOE for review. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.li—elpj Section 404 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Commercial Grade & Fill City of Federal Way, SEPA Threshold Determination, Process IV Land Use Review, NPDES Construction Stormwater Discharge Permit, Right -of -Way Use Permit, and Forest Practice Class -IV General Application. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) VLel The proposal for Greenline Business Park seeks to develop 3 new buildings of varying sizes. The Technology Center will remain; however, the parking lot associated with the Tech Center will be reconfigured to allow for construction of the new buildings. Building A will be ±638,000 SF in size, Building B will be ±282,500 SF in size, and Building C will be ±147,500 SF in size. Pond #1 that receives stormwater runoff from Building A and associate parking will be located across Weyerhaeuser Way S. Ponds # 2, #3, #4 and #5 will be located between the property boundary adjacent to 1-5 and wetlands located west of the existing loop road that travels behind the Tech Center. Site access will be provided by 4 driveways located on Weyerhaeuser Way S. Right -of -Way dedication and frontage improvements along Weyerhaeuser Way S. and S 33(P Street required to meet the Citys Comprehensive Plan are also proposed as part of the Greenline Business Park Development 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. VLe1W A site plan with vicinity map has been included with the Land Use Application package. The current site address for the Weyerhaeuser Technology Center (WTC) is 32901 WEYERHAEUSER WAY S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98001. The northern portion of the development is located in the NE Quarter, of Section 16, Township 21, Range 4. The southern portion of the development is located in the SE Quarter of Section 16, Township 21, Range 4. See Exhibit A of the title report included with the Land Use application for a complete legal description of the property. The largest building will be located north of the WTC and the two other buildings will be located south of the WTC. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS iel Bulletin #050 —May 1, 2014 Page 3 of 14 k:\11andouts\Environmental Checklist.Afaq 2014 1. Earth a. General description of the site 1hel (underline/circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The site slopes down to the west and south from about Elevation 450 feet in the northwest to about Elevation 394 feet in the south. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Dm1pJ ±15% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Zel Varying thicknesses of forest duff and/or topsoil and sod were encountered from ground surface to depths ranging from about 1 to 18 inches in most of the explorations. All explorations encountered and Were terminated in glacial deposits. Dense to very dense glacial till was typically encountered beneath a loose to dense or stiff to very stiff weathered till. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Diew None e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. hf elp] The purpose of site fill and grad activities is to provide an adequate and level building and parking surface. There will be ±308,200 cubic yards of cut and ±275,700 cubic yards of fill for a net cut quantity of ±32,500 cubic yards. During final engineering, additional work will be done to balance the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. el > Erosion could occur as a result of clearing and construction, particularly if earthwork is completed during periods of rainfall. TESC measures will be implemented as approved by the City prior to construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? DILIpI 32 acres (±1,393,920 Square Feet) out of 146 acres= ±21 % of the site h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: DIOW The owner will institute an erosion control plan to be used during earthwork and construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. ftlpl Some heavy machinery exhaust and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. DIgIp Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 4 of 14 k:\Handouts\) nvironmental Checklist May 2014 No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. h�� All construction equipment will be in proper working order and regulated for emissions by the manufacturer and local emissions laws. Vehicles entering and leaving the site will also be regulated for emissions by state and local emissions laws. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to keep any dust from impacting surrounding air quality. 3. Water a. Surface Water t4elo 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. DItIP1 There is 1 man-made fish -bearing stream on -site that originates from the discharge point of the on -site stormwater pond for the Tech Center. There are 63 wetlands within the Site. North Lake abuts the eastern edge of the Site. See attached Wetland report prepared by Talasaea Associates for more details. All wetlands ultimately discharge to Hylebos Creek to the south via surface or groundwater connections. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. �� Yes. Approximately 0.421-acre (18,340 square feet) of wetlands will be impacted. While no impacts are proposed to the onsite stream feature, the stormwater pond which provides the majority of flow to the stream will be modified as part of the proposed development See attached plans for details. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Total wetland fill to equal ±13,428 square feet (0.308 acres). Source of fill will be from site native soil or structural fill from an approved provider. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Vie1W No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note the location on the site plan. iel No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. DWW No b. Ground Water 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses, and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. hf ell No Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 5 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. V2.eI4 N/A c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 264 Run-off from impervious surfaces will be collected and directed into on -site stormwater detention and water quality treatment facilities. Once detained and treated for water quality, the storm water will be released to the downstream system, including the off -site wetlands. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. hel Not as proposed 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No - discharge will occur at the natural location. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: The project contractors, users, and personnel will utilize onsite Best Management Practices. Attached drainage plans show runoff from impervious surfaces will be directed to on site stormwater detention pond. 4. Plants Rielpl a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: gel -X-deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _X-shrubs _ X -grass pasture crop or grain orchards, vineyards, or other permanent crops _X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vielpl Native Native trees and shrubs will be removed during site construction, as well as areas of non- native trees, and a small portion of open field. Some wetlands will be impacted, but the remaining wetlands will remain post -development with their associated buffers. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. del Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 6 of 14 k:\Handouts\1:nvironmental Checklist Ma.y 2014 No native threatened and endangered plant species observed or known to occur on or immediately adjacent to the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. l"el Buffer enhancement with native trees and shrubs will be done as appropriate. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Himalayan blackberry, English ivy, English holly, creeping buttercup 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site, or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: h� elnl birds: hawK songbirds, other eagle mammals: rabbits, squirrels, coyote fish: no fish were observed within the stream; North Lake is stocked with rainbow trout and has large -mouthed bass. b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. VielP1 No listed species are known to occur on or near the Site. North Lake is adjacent to the eastern edge of the Site at its closest point, and bald eagles are known to periodically use this lake for foraging. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. "el The entire region is known to be part of the Pacific Flyway. The Pacific Flyway includes Alaska and the Aleutian Islands and the Rocky Mountains and Pacific coast regions of Canada the United States and Mexico, south to where it becomes blended with other flyways in Central and South America However, the site is not known to be used by migratory fowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. A corridor will be provided between remaining wetlands with their associated buffers and the required forested buffer along the western property boundary. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. Bullfrog, large -mouthed bass 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. VhAIW Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the project Natural gas maybe used to satisfy incidental energy needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. bell No. Proposed building heights will not exceed 42 feet above grade. No existing development utilizes solar energy in proximity to which the shadow cast from the building has any effect Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 7 of 14 k:\l landouts\Environmental Checklist Ala .y 2014 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. No, plans included in the Commercial Grade & Fill Permit Energy conservation will be addressed in the building permit documents. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.D-ielpj None known. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None known. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None known. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None Known at this Time 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. State regulations regarding safety and the handling of hazardous materials will be followed during the construction process. Equipment refueling areas would be located in areas where spill could be quickly contained and where the risk of hazardous materials entering surface water is minimized. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? DidW The primary source of noise near the project site is from vehicular traffic along Weyerhaeuser Way S, Hwy-18, and Interstate-5. It is not anticipated to materially impact the proposed project in any way. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. h� e1 Noise study is forthcoming. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during the site development Construction would occur during permitted construction hours and always in compliance with the City of Federal Way noise regulations, Long-term impacts would be those vehicular trips associated with R&D-, distribution-, manufacturing or office -type uses. Noise generated from the proposed building and office operations is not expected to impact surrounding properties. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: VIOW Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 8 of 14 kAHandouts\Environmental Checklist Afuy 2014 Construction activity will be limited to permitted construction hours and construction equipment will not be allowed to idle for continuous periods of time, which will help mitigate the impacts of potential construction noise. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Ihel Existing uses on these parcels include the Weyerhaeuser Technology Center, passive and active private recreation spaces, access and parking areas, and stormwater facilities. 'This proposal is in conformance with the Concomitant Agreement made by and between the City of Federal Way and Weyerhaeuser Company on August 23, 1994, as well as the applicable portions of the 1994 Federal Way Code that was in effect at that time. North- Office Park (OP-01) East- North Lake, Single Family Residential West- Interstate-5 South- Corporate Park (CP-01) The proposed development may have a minor, long term impact with respect to the additional traffic of deliveries and employee trips. b. Has the project site been used as worldng farmlands or worldng forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? hf elp] No 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding worldng farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how. No impact The site exists on land previously owned by Weyerhaeuser Company and home to the Weyerhaeuser Technology Center (to remain). c. Describe any structures on the site. B164 The Weyerhaeuser Technology Center is used as office space and includes lab spaces for R & D. The shape is slightly irregular but primarily rectangular. The front fapade is covered with glass windows the exterior construction is primarily reinforced concrete. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? iel Corporate Park- 01 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? help Corporate Park g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Rheel l Urban Conservancy Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 9 of 14 kAHandouts\l;nvironmental Checklist May 2014 h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. el Yes, site reconnaissance conducted by Talasaea resulted in discovery of 63 wetlands within the Site. North Lake abuts the eastern edge of the Site. A copy of the wetland delineation (existing conditions) report was submitted with this environmental checklist i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? iel It is anticipated that approximately 900± people would work at the completed project at varying shifts. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? DIel None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. hel N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. V2e1W The project will be developed in accordance with applicable City of Federal Way development and land use codes and the approved Annexation and Concomitant Agreement to ensure the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable Development Regulations. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any. None proposed 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. shell N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Djelo N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. V1el N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? VjLl� ± 42 feet 1- story, concrete cast formed walls or blocks b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? There is a 100' managed forested buffer running parallel to 1-5 and a 50' managed forest buffer running parallel to the northern property line. Views north from S 336'h ST would be altered by the site of Building B and Building C. No regulated views will be impacted. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. liel Bullctin #050 —'May 1, 2014 Pagc 10 of 14 k:\I landouts\Environmental Checklist A16 2014 The Concomitant and Pre -Annexation agreement have provided measures to control aesthetic impacts through the requirement of the managed forest buffers as well as the Landscape provisions. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? iel Parking lot lighting would occur dusk through dawn at completed project Minimal glare would occur from sunlight reflected off parked cars. Additionally, the headlights of traveling vehicles would occur any time of day. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Vk14 No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. N/A 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?D-ielpj Private pedestrian trails meander throughout property, and a public fishing access is located on North Lake to the east b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. DILIO A portion of the private trails (within the wooded area) will be covered by the proposed site development c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. iel A continuous sidewalk will be installed along Weyerhaeuser Way S which will provide for pedestrian connectivity. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located'on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. hf el The Weyerhaeuser Technology Center was constructed in 1978 and is located on the site. The Weyerhaeuser Headquarters building located near the site was constructed in 1969, which makes it 48 years old. Pursuant to CFR 36, Chapter I, subsection 60.4 criteria for evaluation, the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters building may be eligible. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. hf elp] No known landmarks or evidence have been observed on or near the site. Bulledn #050 — May 1, 2014 v Page 11 of 14 k:\Ilandouts\Environmental Checklist Alay 2014 c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Lhel The methods used to assess the potential impacts included GIS data analysis and WISAARD GIS data review. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. If any such historic or cultural evidence is encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work will be halted in the area and a state -approved archeologist/historian will be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. VILIW The project site is t rimarily served by Weyerhaeuser Way S, with a southern boundary bordered by S 336 t St There are 4 access points proposed along Weyerhaeuser Way S, which connects to S 320th St which connects to 1-5. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? DLelW The site is serviced by Pierce County Transit route 501. The closes transit stop is located within a half mile to the south on S 336th St c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? B14114 There were originally 660 parking stalls serving the Technology Center. The final project will result in a total of 1,466 parking stalls. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle, or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). h[ elf] Yes, the frontage along Weyerhaeuser Way South will require frontage improvements per City of Federal Way Road Section K. This public road will include 3 vehicle lanes (2 for each direction of travel plus a turning lane), a 5' bike lane (for each direction of travel, 6' of planter strip, and 8 feet of sidewalk on each side of the ROW. d. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. BILIpI Not expected. e. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? VhelW For new building area of 1,068,000, the site is estimated to generate 3,779 new vehicle trips per day with 304 trips occurring during the AM peak hour and 271 trips during the PM peak hour. Trucks are estimated to account for 20% of the site trips. These estimates were based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th edition. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 12 of 14 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 201 1 1 f. Will the proposal interfere with, affect, or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. Not expected. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. iel Payment of the Citys transportation impact fees is expected, which will help fund City-wide transportation improvements. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. zel The completed building/office facilities would result in a slight increased need for public services to include fire protection, police protection, and health care. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. DiLeIW The increased demand will be offset by impact fees, levies, and taxes required to be paid by the applicant as part of this development Also the proposal has been designed in a manner that will provide adequate access for fire, medic, and police vehicles. 16. Utilities a. Underline/circle utilities currently available at the site: Diel electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service telephone, sanity sewer septic system, other ----- The above listed utilities are either available on -site or will be extended as necessary to serve the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. lel Lakehaven Utility District will provide water and sewer connection. Puget Sound Energy will supply electricity and gas Telephone: Century Link, Verizon, Comcast Fire Protection: South King Fire & Rescue C. SIGNATURE HELP The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: ( —d Printed Name of Signee: 45i4tL- . 14 6E Position and Agency/Organization: - r Date Submitted: i - 1 Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 13 of 14 k:\llandouts\Environmental Checklist Ala .y 2014 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 14 of 14 k:\Ifandouts\l?nvironmcntal Checklist dTuy 2014 S. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 15 of 14 kAllandouts\Enviromnental Checklist play 2014 March 16, 2018 Tom Messmer Vice President - Special Projects Federal Way Campus, LLC 8847 Imperial Highway, Suite H Downy CA, 90242 CfTY r-OM UNITY ID� LOPMEYNT Cultural Resources Archival Study, Greenline Business Park Project, Federal Way, Washington Subject: �� Cardr�a Shaping the Future CONFIDENTIAL Dear Mr. Messmer: RESUBMITTED APR 3 0 2018 Cardno 801 Second Avenue Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98104 USA Phone 206 269 0104 Toll -free 800 368 7511 Fax 206 269 0098 www.cardno.com This letter report describes the results of the archival study conducted by Cardno, Inc. (Cardno) for the Greenline Business Park Project (project), located within the former Weyerhaeuser Company (Weyerhaeuser) campus at 32901 32nd Drive South in Federal Way, Washington. The 77-acre project area includes portions of parcels 152104-9178, 162104-9030, 228500-0010, as well as the entirety of parcels 162104-9013 and 162104-9056, which have recently been purchased by the Industrial Realty Group, LLC (IRG) from Weyerhaeuser (King County Tax Assessor's Office 2018). The project straddles the western half of Section 15 and the eastern half of Section 16 of Township 21 North, Range 4 East of the Willamette Base Meridian (Figures 1 through 3). The proposed Greenline Business Park project includes the construction of three buildings of varying sizes totaling approximately 1,068,000 square feet (ft) surrounding the former Weyerhaeuser Technology Center (WTC), now referred to as the Greenline Technology Center (ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 2017). Additional site improvements include reconfiguration and expansion of the existing parking lot at the Greenline Technology Center, construction of five stormwater ponds, and frontage improvements along Weyerhaeuser Way South and South 336th Street. An inventory to document the historical and architectural significance of the project area was requested by the City of Federal Way upon their review of the Federal Campus Way, LLC's application under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (Revised Code of Washington [RCW] 43.21 C) and implementing rules contained in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11. As outlined in the SEPA checklist submitted to the local planning authority with applications for development, the following questions must be satisfactorily addressed to demonstrate that cultural and historic resources will not be adversely affected by the proposed development: A. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. B. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. Australia • Belgium • Canada • Colombia • Ecuador • Germany • Indonesia • Italy Kenya • New Zealand • Papua New Guinea • Peru • Tanzania • United Arab Emirates United Kingdom • United States • Operations in 85 countries March 16, 2018 (. ' Garclha C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. D. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. On behalf of Federal Campus Way, LLC, Cardno completed an archival study to assess the cultural significance of the project area and to provide a recommendation concerning the potential effects of this project on cultural resources, including those that may be eligible for listing in the Washington Heritage Register (WHR) and/or the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) (termed "historic properties"). Cardno also conducted a field visit to note the existing conditions of the project area and a historic resources survey for the building located at 32901 32nd Drive South (within parcel 162104-9013). The archival study consisted of a literature review of existing cultural resource records for previously recorded historic, ethnohistoric, and precontact archaeological and built environment resources; a review of any local, state, and national register nomination forms; a review of previously conducted cultural resources investigations; and a review of any known or potential Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs) located within 1.0 mile (1.6 kilometer [km]) of the project area. This research included a records search at the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation's (DAHP's) Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (W ISAARD). Additional resources that were consulted include historic -era aerial photographs and county atlases, as well as U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), General Land Office (GLO), and Sanborn Fire Insurance maps. The results of the research were compared to the proposed project plans to determine any potential disturbance to previously recorded cultural resources or historic properties, and to assess the potential for currently unknown cultural resources to exist in the project area and their significance. This study also evaluated potential project - related effects on any known historic properties or cultural resources that may be eligible for listing in the WHIR or NRHP. The building at 32901 32nd Drive South does not meet the age requirement at this time to be eligible for the NRHP or trigger Criteria Consideration G of the NRHP eligibility criteria, but it maintains enough architectural merit that it should be reevaluated when it is 50 years old. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 3 �7\ ............. - � FarrrooJ • t •tl I Idotdl5� - Kenl AkOwn Way r .. I.Ak.4AM1d ' ' � r Hw e. •, Mwton 9xrydal• of r Pro ectArea, laktland Swlth pu, t l_ - hiew. a 11 •� ,\ - lake ` IOPM11� I Tapp, Sums �,Y WOW \�" O N 4,ar Mecema i � Pfalec rion. NAD 09 UTM Zone ION n`�yhe 0 1 2 4 Wes Project Area 0 2 4 6 Kilometers ;c,naa Greephne $ Lis 4lte9s Pork 13ro]Cd ItxlusTraiA Rea ItyaGrotIp. LLC �i�ia+ j King County, ■Ycishlnato{i K-15, ---en a„ -- Sr C. F00 SMtn NA 11 Pn (-1)Z06-:6"104 F., 1•1)_05:6 1R uSGSTe ) hkSrt:r.:.a �«r.b,r.o'n ptyr• P• Figure 1 Project location. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 4 (..� Car-c na ii ��yiE�skrr r.■r. �r_' It ` � ^� }SAsY. �l 1. 1 � V� • 6 � i � - .) W,}.y y•1 { lY �.� + 1�PV1HK ti • s— � t •�� .�:: e ;+I �, • ! 7a! j ) • y � •_ ' ter` '11 , J. •' - • . _ ,396 ■ � #` � � � I i - � � , 1, _+ �!, I ; �;-= .. � 'I /riif• `is ,'' .. i :� • - rrw �.. I i • 1 � I • � ' A . 4 �r fJ Iw .A P1412CHon:,NAA 89 r;l •Zcne•i4N ,) !'-� rc rat 0 5001,000 2,000n Project Area 0 206DO m Q 1.0-mile Buffer 1:30 000 — -- Greenline Business Park Project sacra n Industrial Realty Group, LLC King County, Washington *w3. .WAx[o. Phone (f1).Oa=6S-DIGJ �e. (.tj'_o6 .64C099 USGS 7.5' Poverty Bay (1997)2003) Quadrangle Figure 2 Project area plotted on USGS topographic quadrangle (USGS 1997/2003). CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 5 4c.:7 Camino o zoo 400 600 n Project Parcel o 100 zoo m ® Project Area ,;1•,y Greenhae SusFaess Park Proxc[ V f �M�17� i' i fndustrisl Really Group. LLC King County, Washrnaton 501 SeesOCAv-5l 700.See0k.61'AWN PW.1+11206-269-010A FU4+11206-269-009E Esfti wwM 1•r1a•yiwv F• ... ,{• wxx.:6raiacom Figure 3 Project area displayed on aerial imagery. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 Environmental Setting The project is located along the eastern border of the City of Federal Way between the Puyallup and Green River Valleys in the Puget Lowland physiographic province. This physiographic province is a low-lying area between the Cascade Range to the east and the Olympic Mountains to the west. The Puget Sound was shaped by widespread continental glaciation that extended south from British Columbia to the northern Puget Lowland and along the western flanks of the Cascade Range (Miss 2008). This area is also known as the Puget Sound Trough physiographic province, which extends to the Cowlitz and Chehalis Rivers (Franklin and Dyrness 1988). The Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation was the last glacial maximum in the region and is dated between ca. 19,000 and 16,000 years before present (BP) (Easterbrook 2003). During the maximum extent of this glaciation, most of the northern third of Washington lay beneath a nearly continuous sheet of glacial ice (Easterbrook 2003). The outwash deposited during the southward advance of the Puget lobe of the Cordilleran ice sheet filled the Puget Sound basin, forming an extensive low-lying area bounded on the west by the Olympic Mountains and on the east by the Cascade Range. Sometimes called the "great Lowland Fill," the surface of this fill rarely rises above 500-ft elevation (Booth and Goldstein 1994). The Federal Way area is located at elevations between 300 and 500 ft on an undulating landform defined as the Des Moines Drift Upland. This upland landform was a long, narrow island that stretched between Seattle and Tacoma, with Puget Sound to the west and marine waters filling the fjord of the Duwamish Embayment on the east (Forsman et al. 1999). The land experienced isostatic rebound between 13,000 and 7,000 years BP as global sea levels rose and tectonism began to shape the Puget Sound shoreline (Dragovich et al. 1994; Miss 2008). At the regional scale, the larger Pleistocene glacial troughs are occupied by marine waters or large freshwater lakes today. Subglacial incision when the ice sheet overrode the advance outwash, and subglacial incision during maximum extent and subsequent retreat of the ice sheet, created a number of large, deep troughs and meltwater channels. As a result, the geomorphology of the region is now dominated by well-defined north -trending troughs separated by extensive fluted drift uplands, like the Des Moines Drift Upland. The surfaces of the uplands are characterized by numerous surface depressions, now occupied by small lakes and peat bogs, created as glacial ice retreated (Mullineaux 1970). The largest of these bodies of water in the Seattle metropolitan area include the Puget Sound, the Duwamish-Green River Valley, Lake Washington, and Lake Sammamish (Liesch et al. 1963; Yount et al. 1993). Freshwater lakes that have filled glacial depressions and are local to the Federal Way vicinity include Steel Lake, Mirror Lake, Five -Mile Lake, Lake Geneva, Star Lake, Mud Lake, Lake Dolloff, and North Lake, which borders the project area to the east (Caster 2004). Approximately 13 acres of subsurface peat have been identified along the north rim of North Lake (Caster 2004). The postglacial environment of the project area around 15,000 years BP was a grassland savanna composed of scattered pine trees, and it remained as such until approximately 6,000 or 5,000 years BP, when the contemporary Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest developed (Brubaker 1991). The Des Moines Drift Upland remained an island until approximately 5,700 years BP, when the Osceola Mudflow, a massive lahar that resulted from a large-scale summit and flank collapse on Mount Rainier, traveled down the White River Valley from Mount Rainier and deposited large quantities of mud in both the Green River Valley and the Puyallup River delta. After passing through the White River bedrock gorge upstream of what is now Mud Mountain Dam, the mudflow blanketed glacial drift valleys and plains with as much as 100 ft of clay -rich gravel, cobbles, and boulders (Forsman et al. 1999). Osceola Mudflow deposits cover an area of about 550 square km in the Puget Lowland, extending at least as far as the Seattle suburb of Kent and to Commencement Bay (Dragovich et al. 1994; Mullineaux 1970; Palmer 1997; Valiance and Scott 1997). Post-lahar fluvial aggradation and delta progradation eventually filled the ancient Puyallup and Duwamish arms of the Puget Sound to their present positions. Both mudflow materials and upriver alluvial sediments extended the leading edge of the delta northwestward, filling Commencement Bay at a rate of approximately 8.2 ft (2.5 meters [m]) per year (Weaver 2003:6). CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 C,,,'� Gard" The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Data Explorer classifies soils in the general project area as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, which belongs to the soil taxonomy order Inceptisol (USDA 2018). The Alderwood series consists of moderately well -drained soils located on uplands and terraces. These soils formed under conifers in glacial deposits on slopes that range from 0 to 70 percent (Snyder et al. 1973:8). GeoEngineers, Inc. conducted a geotechnical engineering study at the project area in 2017 to evaluate the on -site subsurface sediments and provide recommendations for the proposed development (Helvey and Overbay 2017). The study evaluated previously excavated test pit explorations from 2016 and conducted additional explorations in July 2017. As described by GeoEngineers, the top stratum typically consisted of forest duff and/or topsoil that extended from the ground surface to depths that ranged between 1 and 18 inches below ground surface. This organic -rich stratum was typically underlain by medium dense grayish brown silty fine to medium sand with some gravel and cobbles, identified as weathered glacial till, and extended from 3 to 5 ft below surface. The weathered till interfaced with very dense and moist brownish gray silty fine to medium sand with some gravel and cobbles (i.e., native glacial till material). Each exploration terminated in these native glacial till deposits. In explorations placed within the existing parking lot surfaces and surrounding the south-central retention ponds, loose to dense fill was encountered between 1.75 and 7.5 ft below surface of explorations. The fill consisted of medium dense silty sand and interfaced with native glacial till. The regional climate is characterized by a maritime regime, with cool, typically dry summers and mild, wet winters. Since the last glacial episode, the climate has experienced several cycles of warming/drying and cooling/increasing moisture. Following the last glacial advance, a period of rapid warming and reduced precipitation marked the climate until approximately 7,000 years BP, at which time precipitation levels began increasing and temperatures began cooling, similar to modern conditions. From 4,500 to 2,000 years BP, this cooling/increased precipitation trend continued throughout what is known as the Neoglacial. During this period, conditions were substantially wetter and cooler than at present. The last major fluctuation, the Little Ice Age, occurred from approximately 500 to 100 years BP and was a period of increased precipitation and cooler temperatures (Ames and Maschner 1999). The project lies within the western hemlock vegetation zone in the Puget Lowland, which provides a highly productive ecological system with a complex mosaic of microenvironments. Historically, the zone includes the climax species that defines it, as well as western redcedar (Thuja plicata) (Franklin and Dyrness 1988). The overall modern regional vegetation profiles were not established until approximately 5,000 to 3,000 years BP (Ames and Maschner 1999). Forests are currently dominated by western hemlock, Douglas fir, coast red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa var arborescens), and western redcedar. The understory consists of mostly undisturbed low brush including hardhack (Spiraea douglash), Labrador tea (Rhododendron spp.), crab apple (Malus spp.), and cascara buckthorn (Rhamnus purshiana), as well as various small herbs and some mosses (Caster 2004). However, historical and modern land use, such as commercial, residential, and urban development; logging; and small-scale farming, have greatly modified the vegetative profile of the area. In precontact times, the region was rich in faunal resources whose predictable seasonal migrations were vital to the native inhabitants of the Puget Sound region, especially the salmon species that would migrate up Hylebos Creek toward present-day Federal Way (Williams et al. 1975). Anadromous fish species continue migrate seasonally to spawning streams throughout the region, including Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho (O. kisutch), chum (O, keta), rainbow trout (O. mykiss), and char (Salvelinus spp.). Prior to the Euro-American settlement of the region, a variety of terrestrial animals once thrived in the microenvironments associated with freshwater rivers, streams, springs, ponds, and swamps of the Puget Lowland. However, the diversity of microenvironments, and, as a consequence, the diversity of faunal species, has been greatly affected by settlement and development. The few species not pushed out by these activities include black -tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus), beaver (Castor canadensis), marmot (Marmota caligata), raccoon (Procyon lotor), various avian species, and suckers. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 Archaeology The earliest known occupations in western Washington, termed Paleo-Indian, are evidenced by the appearance of large, fluted projectile points dating to approximately 12,800 years BP (Ames and Maschner 1999; Carlson 1990). Paleo-Indians were primarily hunter -gatherers with small populations and high levels of mobility. Some researchers have argued that these early people were maritime oriented (Carlson 2003; Dixon 1993; Fedje and Christensen 1999; Fladmark 1979). In western Washington, sites from this period are rare. Much of the late Pleistocene terrain was uninhabitable due to glaciers, and the lands that were occupied by Paleo-Indians were predominately coastal reaches. During the glaciation period, ocean levels fell almost 400 ft globally (Kirk and Daugherty 2007), but with the onset of the warming Holocene, ocean levels rose and submerged many of these coastal sites. However, some sites are not submerged, and instead are located above the present shoreline due to eustatic, tectonic, and isostatic effects that vary throughout the region (Fedje and Christensen 1999). The Archaic period dates from approximately 12,500 to 6,400 years BP (Ames and Maschner 1999; Carlson 1990). Archaic -period sites, similar to Paleo-Indian sites, are poorly represented. Changes in sea level and vegetation have obscured many Archaic -period sites along the coast (Ames and Maschner 1999). However, as the glaciers receded, people were able to occupy larger expanses in the interior of the Puget Sound. Archaic -period peoples likely maintained small populations, high levels of mobility, and focused on a combination of maritime, littoral, and terrestrial economies. Archaic -period occupations are largely characterized by stone tool assemblages that are typically composed of large, stemmed lanceolate projectile points and bifaces. In addition, the Pacific Northwest Archaic period saw an introduction of microblades, which are sometimes present in stone tool assemblages (Ames and Maschner 1999). Pacific -period sites date from approximately 6,400 to 250 years BP. The period ends at the introduction of smallpox to the region (Ames and Maschner 1999). The Early Pacific period (6,400 to 3,800 years BP) was marked by the increased use of marine resources, the appearance of human burials in middens and cemeteries, a diversification in subsistence activities, the disappearance of microblade technology, and the increased use of bone, antler, and ground stone tools. Major developments also included the appearance of ground stone celts (adze blades) and a proliferation in chipped -stone tool forms and styles and decorative/ornamental pieces, which likely represent contact and trade with groups in neighboring cultural areas (Kirk and Daugherty 2007). The Middle Pacific period (3,800 to 1,800/1,500 years BP) displays major developments including the appearance of long-term settlements (plank houses), intensification of salmon capture (appearance of wooden fish weirs and girdled/drilled net sinkers), and diversification in tool form and style. Late Pacific period (1,800/1,500 to 250 years BP) developments are represented by the appearance of heavy-duty woodworking tools, an overall decline in the use of chipped -stone tools, and an increase in funerary ritual/burial activities. Sea levels became stable by the start of the Middle Pacific period, and sites representing the Middle and Late periods are located across the Northwest Coast region (Ames and Maschner 1999). Ethnography The proposed project is located within the traditional territory of the Muckleshoot and Puyallup, two Puget Salish or Lushootseed-speaking groups (Suttles and Lane 1990). As speakers of the Southern Coast Salish dialect, the Muckleshoot and Puyallup were among a set of closely related peoples in the Puget Sound region that included the Snoqualmie, Suquamish, Skykomish, Snohomish, Skokomish, Duwamish, and Nisqually (Suttles and Lane 1990). In their aboriginal language, the Puyallup were known as the spuyalapabs, meaning "generous and welcoming behavior to all people (friends and strangers) who enter our lands," which indicates the frequency and nature of Puyallup precontact interactions (Puyallup Tribe of Indians 2018). Following increased conflict in the 1850s on account of Euro-American settlement encouraged by the Donation Land Claim Act, a new treaty combined the White River tribes under the Muckleshoot name and established what remains as the only Indian reservation now within the boundaries of King County. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 (�,") Cardna Both the Muckleshoot and Puyallup groups lived in winter villages along the Puyallup and White Rivers, and inland from the historic shorelines of Commencement Bay and Hylebos Creek (Haeberlin and Gunther 1930; Smith 1940).. They preferred locations above the tideflats at confluences of major creeks, which would provide protection from the elements, fresh water, and access to fishing sites. The tideflats, with marine and freshwater environments, provided a rich subsistence base that was dominated by salmon and supplemented by hunting and gathering. Winter villages consisted of multifamily longhouses made from cedar planks and ranged from a single building to up to 10 houses (Haeberlin and Gunther 1930). During the spring, these groups traveled throughout their territory for resource procurement, which extended throughout the current project area, as well as across Puget Sound to Vashon Island, and southeast to the tributaries of the Green, Puyallup, Carbon, and Stuck Rivers toward Mount Rainier (Rinck et al. 2012; Roedel et al. 2003; Smith 1940). Small, mobile groups constructed temporary, mat - covered structures at fishing and plant -gathering camps during seasonal procurement rounds. At the camps, they smoked fish, shellfish, and game and dried berries and roots to take back to the village sites for winter supplies (Rinck et al. 2012). Salmon constituted the bulk of the food supply, providing for immediate consumption, winter stores, and surplus for exchange (Suttles and Lane 1990). Cardno is not aware of any known ethnographic place names within the project area. However, there are several ethnographic place names recorded along Commencement Bay, Lake Doloff, and the Puyallup River and its tributaries in the general vicinity of the project area (Dailey n.d.; Waterman et al. 2001), as listed below. Non - English names are Lushootseed. • XaxtL! translates to "brushy," which refers to Hylebos Creek. A Catholic missionary named Hylebos founded St. George's School along this creek. • LtcELEb refers to the tideflats where shipyards stood during the early twentieth century. • Tcaua'lgo translate to "hidden water," which refers to Brown's Point on the north side of Commencement Bay. A freshwater spring was observed along the shoreline at this location, which was concealed by immature alder trees. • 81skwa'dis translates to "where there are whales," and refers to Lake Dolloff, which is the source of Mill Creek. It was believed that whales used to swim into this lake via an underground channel. • s'HAWHT'1-ahbch refers to the location in present-day northeast Tacoma where Hylebos Creek empties into Commencement Bay. People from this village were said to have moved across Puget Sound to establish a village at present-day Gig Harbor, TWAH-well-kawh. Silver salmon were plentiful in Hylebos Creek. Historical Context British Naval Captain George Vancouver was the first Euro-American to document the eastern Puget Sound shoreline in 1792. His initial observations of the region reported clouds of smoke on the high bluffs as the local Native Americans had set brush fires to drive out game for hunting (Stein 1999a, 2003). Over the next three decades, several military and commercial expeditions explored the greater region to chart the coastline and scout the interior for resources. William Fraser Tolmie was the first settler in the region of the Puyallup River Valley, and was a medical officer for the Hudson's Bay Company in the early 1830s. Led by Nuckalkat, a Puyallup Indian, and several other Native American guides, Dr. Tolmie passed through the valley, where approximately 2,000 Puyallup Indians lived, on his way to Mount Rainier (City of Puyallup 2018). As the influx of Euro-American settlers encroached on Puyallup land during the subsequent decades, encouraged by the 1850 Donation Land Claim Act, the Puyallup negotiated the Treaty of Medicine Creek in 1854, which ceded most of their territories and forced the tribe onto a reservation of 1,280 acres (Chesley 2008). Several years of conflict ensued following the signing of the treaty between the CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 10 "� Garcina tribal members of the Nisqually, Muckleshoot, Puyallup, and Klickitat Tribes against the U.S. military and local militiamen, which is typically referred to as the Puget Sound Indian Wars. The Puyallup Indian Reservation was subsequently enlarged to 18,062 acres in January 1856 (Becker 2006). Euro-American settlement of the Green River Valley began at the time the Washington Territory was established in 1853. Around this time, wagon trains began to arrive over the Naches Pass using a crude military road that passed from Fort Steilacoom to Fort Walla Walla through present-day Auburn (Lentz 1990). Many of the early settlers took advantage of the Donation Land Claim Act that allowed pioneers to claim 160 acres. The city of Auburn, east of Federal Way, lays claim to some of the earliest Euro-American settlements in King County (Stein 1999b). A small community was established there in the early 1850s at the confluence of the Green and White Rivers, which were fed by the predictable snowmelt from the Cascade Range. The abundance of resources soon created a vibrant hub for farming, trading, and industry. As this growing settlement encroached on the valley's original inhabitants, the Skopamish, Smalhkamish, and Stkamish Indian Tribes, conflict soon followed. Settlement of the valley was slowed by conflicts with Indian tribes during the mid-1850s when many of the early pioneer families left their farms in the valley for Seattle during the conflict (Peto et al. n.d.). In contrast, the Federal Way region, nestled between the Puyallup and Green River Valleys, was relatively uninhabited by Euro-Americans during the nineteenth century prior to the waterfront settlement that emerged in the latter half of the century (Forsman et al. 1999). While settlers were drawn to the idyllic flat prairies around the White River, which require little clearing, and abundant resources at the mouth of the Puyallup River, the densely wooded forests and glacial till substrate that made up the Federal Way region was not ideal for agriculture, and thus permanent settlements took longer to become entrenched. Federal surveyors platted the area in the 1850s in preparation for the construction of a military road between Forts Bellingham and Steilacoom (Stein 2003). Aptly named Military Road, it was completed by 1860 and connected Seattle with Pierce County. Early homesteaders, including Ernst Ferdinand Lange, Sam Stone, and John Barker, flocked to the Poverty Bay shoreline at what is now known as Redondo in order to maintain proximity to reliable marine resources (Caster 2015). By the end of the nineteenth century, the shoreline homesteaders had turned their attention to inland resources, and Redondo became one of the first logging settlements on Puget Sound (Caster 2004). Two sawmills emerged at Steel Lake in 1890 and at Star Lake in 1909 in order to process and export the abundant harvested timber (Caster 2015). The Weyerhaeuser Timber Company incorporated in 1900 when Frederick Weyerhaeuser and 15 partners convened in Tacoma and purchased 900,000 acres of land in Washington from the Northern Pacific Railway, including what was to become Federal Way (Weyerhaeuser 2018). By 1913, due to intensive logging practices, many of the large -diameter trees, defined as trees with greater than 15-ft diameter, had been entirely logged (Caster 2015). In order to meet the transportation demands of the growing region with the advent of the automobile, construction of a 24-mile-long strip of federal highway began in 1915 that would connect Tacoma and Seattle, with the ultimate goal of traversing the entire western coast of the U.S. (Caster 2015; Stein 2003). This federal highway was to be named Highway 99, but was referred to as Pacific Highway South. The historical Military Road served as the footprint for much of this federal highway, which was initially unpaved until a tax restructure in 1927 allocated state taxes for building and paving highways (Caster 2015). On account of its proximity to the federal highway, a newly constructed elementary school that consolidated five districts was given the name Federal Way School (Caster 2015). The name "Federal Way" was officially accepted by the local Chamber of Commerce in the 1950s, although the town was still part of unincorporated King County (Earley 2005). Federal Way mainly served as a culinary and shopping destination for travelers along Highway 99 during the mid - twentieth century (Stein 2003). Community growth climbed sharply in the latter half of the twentieth century when large corporations moved into the region, particularly Boeing and Weyerhaeuser in the 1960s. In 1968, CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com 11 �'� Cardnu March 16, 2018 Weyerhaeuser purchased 430 acres of land and began construction on its new corporate headquarters, which would be the "first major application of open -landscape office design in the U.S." (Weyerhaeuser 2018). Although the city unsuccessfully tried to incorporate in 1971, 1981, and 1985, the community approved incorporation of Federal Way in 1990 (Stein 2003). Historical Map Review The 1868 GLO cadastral survey plat plots North Lake in its present-day orientation and shows the project area as sectioned but undeveloped (Bureau of Land Management [BLM] 2018). No human -made features or structures are shown to have been constructed within any of the parcels constituting the project area at that time. Less than 1.0 mile (1.6 km) east of the project area, the "Military and Telegraph Road" is plotted meandering around large natural landforms (i.e., elevation changes, bodies of water), roughly trending north/south. This plotted road is the same aforementioned Military Road that was built to connect Fort Bellingham to Fort Steilacoom by way of Seattle and Tacoma, and served as the footprint to the highway that ultimately brought Euro-Americans into the Federal Way region (Stein 2003). The GLO plat shows the Puyallup Indian Reservation located in the very southwestern corner of the township/range (BLM 2018). Records show that the land patent for the portion of the project area within Section 15 (T21 N, R4E) was purchased by the Northern Pacific Railroad Company on May 10, 1895 (BLM 2018). The land patent for Section 16 (T21 N, R4E) was purchased by the State of Washington on November 11, 1889 (BLM 2018). USGS topographical maps convey that by 1897 neither land holder had developed within the project area (USGS 2018). A topographic map from 1900 plots a single structure southwest of North Lake outside of the current project area, but within what would eventually become the'Weyerhaeuser campus. Historical topographic maps from the turn of the twentieth century to the World War II era are not readily available online. However, by 1949, a network of roads had been built that nearly surrounded the entirety of North Lake, along which countless residential structures had been constructed. By 1968, Interstate 5 (1-5) had been constructed and bisected Section 16 northeast/southwest, and several additional structures had been built toward the interior of Section 16, west of North Lake. The 1973 USGS topographic map is the first to show the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters building and associated pond south of 336th Street; by 1981, the WTC and associated road network appear to have been constructed (USGS 2018). King County atlases that date to 1907 show that the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 15 (T21 N, R4E) was owned by William Hatfield (Anderson Map Company 1907). The portion of Section 16 (T21 N, R4E) within the project area appears under the generalized ownership of "School," without further qualification. Puget Sound Electrical Company and Weyerhaeuser Timber Companies appear as large land -holding entities in the surrounding area at this time. By 1912 and through to 1936, Section 16 appears once again as being owned by the State of Washington, which may indicate continuous ownership of this portion of the project area, given the previous operation of a state -funded school in the area (Kroll Map Company 1912, 1926; Metsker 1936). The eastern half of the southeaster quarter of Section 16 (i.e., Lots 1 and 2) appears to have been temporarily purchased from the state by C.B. Niblock in 1912, then sold back to the state by 1926. In 1936, these parcels are owned by Purdy's Resort (Metsker 1936). Meanwhile, the portion of project area land within Section 15 had changed hands from William Hatfield to Minerva Fullenwider by 1912, to J. Combs and H. Raymond by 1926, and to "Goldens (sic) Lake" by 1936. Readily available King County atlases from the mid- to later -twentieth century do not provide sufficient detail to provide relevant land -holding information (Metsker 1940, 1950, 1980; Thomas Bros. 1955). In 2015, the project area was zoned as a Corporate Park, under a special condition Ordinance #93-190 (City of Federal Way 2015). Historic -era municipal zoning maps for the city of Federal Way do not exist or are not readily available, likely because the city did not incorporate until 1990 (Stein 2003). Additionally, there are no historic -era Sanborn Fire Insurance Company maps for the Federal Way region (Digital Sanborn Maps 1867-1970). CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 12 C,r� Cc rdno Archival Research Cardno conducted a background search and literature review of existing cultural resource records; local, state, and national register nomination forms; previous cultural resources investigations; and any known or potential TCPs in and within 1.0 mile (1.6 km) of the project area. According to the DAHP's predictive model available on the WISAARD online database, the majority of the project area has low risk for encountering buried archaeological deposits. A small portion of the northeastern portion of the project area has moderately low risk for encountering buried archaeological deposits. Previous Investigations Six cultural resources surveys were previously conducted within 1.0 mile (1.6 km) of the project area between 1999 and 2014 (Table 1). There are no previously conducted surveys that overlap with the current project area. Table 1 Cultural Resources within 1.0 Mile of the Project Area (n 1999 Forsman Regional Express/Federal Way and Star Lake 1339832 Survey Report 0.1 and 0.5 et al. Project Cultural Resource Assessment, Federal mile W Way Alternative 2005 Earley Cultural Resources Assessment of the 1345011 Survey Report 0.15 mile W Thompson Park Project, Federal Way 2005 Luttrell Letter to Kimberly Farley Regarding 1-5: Pierce 1345762 Survey Report 0.5 mile SSW County Line to Tukwila Stage 4 HOV Project 2006 Bard and FINAL REPORT: Cultural Resources Discipline 1348206 Survey Report 0.1 mile SW Durio Report for 1-5 SR 161 /SR 18 Triangle Improvements 2006 Luttrell Cultural Resources Investigations for 1348213 Survey Report 0.9 mile NNE Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Lake Dolloff Access Redevelopment Project 2014 Baldwin Cultural Resources Assessment for the Pacific 1685856 Survey Report 0.6 mile W Highway South HOV Lanes Phase V (S 340th Street to S 359th Street) Project. Federal Way Notes: HOV = high occupancy vehicle(s); I = Interstate; LAAS = Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services; SR = State Route Sverdrup Civil, Inc. retained Larson Anthropological Archeological Services, Limited (LAAS) to conduct a cultural resources assessment for the Federal Way Alternative of the Regional Express/Federal Way and Star Lake Project (Forsman et al. 1999). Each project location that was designated for proposed ground disturbance was surveyed for archaeological materials. Two project locations are located approximately 0.1 mile (0.2 km) and 0.5 mile (0.8 km) west of the current project area. No archaeological resources were identified during the survey. A survey of the historic structures in the vicinity of these project locations determined that this project would have no adverse effect on structures listed or eligible for listing in the NRHP. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com 13 (,., Cal-cino March 16, 2018 The City of Federal Way proposed site improvements to Thompson Park in Federal Way, Washington, and retained Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. (NWAA) to conduct a cultural resources assessment for the project, located approximately 0.15 mile west of the current project area (Earley 2005). The assessment, which included both pedestrian and subsurface investigations, did not encounter any precontact or historic -era cultural resources and recommended that no further cultural investigations were necessary for the project to proceed (Earley 2005). On behalf of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Archaeological and Historical Services (AHS) of Eastern Washington University conducted a cultural resources evaluation of a historical foundation (451<100719) inadvertently discovered during vegetation grubbing (Luttrell 2005a). See below for additional details on the historic -era site. In 2006, a cultural resources discipline team composed of eight engineering and consulting firms prepared a discipline report to evaluate the effects that the proposed WSDOT project would have on cultural resources within the study area (Bard and Durio 2006). This project was located at the intersections of 1-5 with State Route (SR)-18 and SR-161, the closest of which was approximately 0.1 mile southwest of the current project area. The study did not identify any precontact or historic -period archaeological resources, TCPs, or historic structures eligible for listing in the NRHP. AHS was retained by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in 2006 to conduct a cultural resources investigation for the Lake Dolloff Access Redevelopment Project, located approximately 0.9 mile north- northwest of the current project area (Luttrell 2006). The project surveyed 2.71 acres along Lake Dolloff, encountering only non -diagnostic modern debris, likely the result of recreational litter. AHS recommended that no further cultural resources work was necessary for the proposed project (Luttrell 2006). In 2014, Drayton Archaeology (DA) conducted a cultural resources assessment on behalf of Widener and Associates for a highway expansion project located 0.6 mile west of the current project area (Baldwin 2014). The cultural resources assessment, which consisted of pedestrian survey, visual reconnaissance, and a review of soil borehole logs previously excavated within the project area, did not identify any cultural resources. As such, DA recommended that no historic properties were affected by the undertaking. Archaeological Resources The records indicate that no archaeological sites have been previously recorded within the project area. One known historic cultural resource was identified within 1.0 mile (1.6 km) of the project area (Table 2). No TCPs were identified within the 1.0-mile (1.6-km) search radius. Table 2 Previously Recorded Archaeological Resources within 1.0 Mile of the Project Area (n=1) 45KI00719 - Historic residential Not Eligible 1345762 Luttrell 2005b 0.5 mile SSW structure Bartoy 2013 Site 45KI00719 is a historic residential structure and associated historic debris scatter that was identified at the western extent of the South 348th Street cul-de-sac and west of 1-5, approximately 0.5 mile south-southwest of the current project area. The structure's foundation measured approximately 20 ft by 18 ft and appeared to have been constructed from both water -round and angular cobbles and boulders (Luttrell 2005b). At the time of recording in 2005, the tallest point of the foundation measured approximately 6 ft high, but portions of the foundation were observed to be crumbling. Additional structural materials observed in the vicinity of the foundation included large disturbed boulders, small concrete slabs, flat window glass, brick, plywood, and lumber, among other materials. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com 14 <. " cardna March 16, 2018 WSDOT recommended that the site was not eligible for inclusion in the NRHP in 2005; DAHP concurred with the eligibility determination for the site (Griffith 2005). Eastern Washington University's AHS revisited the site in 2013 and found that the site had been removed by WSDOT during right-of-way construction, and no longer exists (Bartoy 2013). Historic Resources The records search indicates that 22 historic properties are located within the 1.0-mile (1.6-km) search radius of the project area (Table 3). Of the 22 historic properties within the search radius, 2 properties have been determined eligible for listing in historic registers, 19 properties have been determined not eligible for listing in historic registers, and 1 property has not been formally evaluated. Table 3 Previously Recorded Historic Resources within 1.0 Mile of the Project Area (n=22) 28910 Weyerhaeuser 33663 Weyerhaeuser Building 1969 Eligible 0.2 mile S Headquarters Way S 40945 Stevenson 32330 Pacific Hwy S Building 1945 Unevaluated 0.8 mile W Motel 86451 - 33570 Pacific Hwy S Building Not Eligible 0.5 mile W 86947 Stevenson 33330 Pacific Hwy S Building 1948 Not Eligible 0.5 mile W Motel 100773 Calvary 2415 S 320th St Building 1956 Eligible 0.3 mile NW Lutheran Church 673607 - 31405 18th Ave S Building 1959 Not Eligible 1.0 mile NW 674015 - 31612 28th Ave S Building 1951 Not Eligible 0.5 mile N 674016 - 31250 28th Ave S Building 1968 Not Eligible 0.7 mile N 674017 - 31228 28th Ave S Building 1943 Not Eligible 0.7 mile N 674018 Steel Lake 31130 28th Ave S Building 1959 Not Eligible 0.8 mile N Maintenance Facility 674019 31104 28th Ave S Building 1959 Not Eligible 0.9 mile N 674027 31016 28th Ave S Building 1963 Not Eligible 0.9 mile N 674028 31004 28th Ave S Building 1943 Not Eligible 0.9 mile N 674029 31000 28th Ave S Building 1943 Not Eligible 1.0 mile N 674117 31458 Pacific Hwy S Building 1970 Not Eligible 0.9 mile NW 674119 31254 Pacific Hwy S Building 1961 Not Eligible 1.0 mile NW 674318 Belmor Mobile 2101 S 324th St Building 1966 Not Eligible 0.4 mile W Home Park 674674 Marie Wells 3911 328th St Building 1960 Not Eligible 0.2 mile E CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 15 C:� Car-dno 675339 Shell Gas Station and Food Mart 31660 Pacific Hwy S Building 1957 Not Eligible 0.8 mile NW 675407 - 31675 Pacific Hwy S Building 1968 Not Eligible 0.8 mile NW 675408 Church's Chicken 31717 Pacific Hwy S Building 1969 Not Eligible 0.8 mile NW 709523 - 3409 20th Ave S Building Not Eligible 0.8 mile NW Cultural Significance Cardno's Senior Archaeologist, Jennifer M. Ferris, MA, RPA, conducted a field visit on February 9, 2018. During her visit, she documented the existing conditions and photographed the substantial twentieth century land use modification of the project area (Figures 4 through 8). Archival research indicates that a low level of human activity may have taken place within or adjacent to the project area during precontact and historic times. Of the few studies that have been conducted in the region, none have identified any precontact cultural materials. Little evidence suggests any long-term precontact occupation within the project area; rather, the land that encompasses the current project area was only traversed for resource procurement during seasonal collection. Furthermore, the deposits within the project area consist of a shallow organic -rich sod/forest duff stratum, underlain by native glacial till material (Helvey and Overbay 2017). The glacial till deposited by glacial retreat (Dragovich et al. 2002), which indicates that cultural items, if present, would not be deeply buried. The area underwent significant historic -era and modern land use modification including logging and commercial development, which would have disturbed the shallow glacial till. Cardno concludes that the potential for encountering surficial and/or subsurface precontact archaeological deposits between the modern surface and the base of the Holocene sediments is low. Though low potential, it is possible that archaeological resources currently unknown within the project area may hold importance as properties of religious and cultural significance (including TCPs) to Indian tribes. Cardno also concludes that the potential for encountering surficial and/or subsurface historic archaeological materials between the modern surface and the base of the Holocene sediments is low. Historic archaeological deposits that may exist in the area are likely to be associated with the Weyerhaeuser campus and/or historic -era timber operation (e.g., saw blades, spring -board stump features). CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 16 4 . J Cardnc p Figure 4 Overview of the former WTC building from turnaround in northern portion of the project area; facing southeast. Figure 5 Overview of the north entrance road into the former WTC campus and present land use modification; facing south. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 17 f.Z� G`ardnv Figure 6 Foot trail around the former WTC campus toward retention pond along the western margins of the project area; facing north. Figure 7 Overview of retention pond from the southwestern portion of the project area; facing northeast. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 18 � Camino Figure 8 Overview of Weyerhaeuser Way South and existing utility infrastructure from the eastern portion of the project area; facing northeast. Architectural Significance Cardno's Project Architectural Historian, Michelle Sadlier, MA, conducted a historic resources survey on February 6, 2018. She documented and photographed the WTC building, located at 32901 32nd Drive South (within parcel 162104-9013) and its associated outbuildings. Given that the WTC building and its associated outbuildings are younger than 50 years in age, a Historic Property Inventory form was not completed. Narrative The project is located 0.2 mile from the central Weyerhaeuser Headquarters campus and consists of the WTC grounds and a number of adjacent, undeveloped parcels. Construction drawings for the WTC indicate that it was designed in 1976 by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, which is the firm that also designed the 1969 NRHP-eligible Weyerhaeuser Headquarters. Construction of the WTC was completed in late 1977/early 1978 (Figure 9) (Seattle Times 1977; King County Tax Assessor's Office 2018). CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 19 C'01) Camino We,-.••,..dser Techaolcgy C'.r, March 7, 1977 Figure 9 Construction of the Weyerhaeuser Technology Center; facing east. (Source: Weyerhaeuser company files) As designed, the purpose of the WTC was to combine all of Weyerhaeuser's research, development, and engineering services previously located in other offices around the country into one, centralized campus (Figures 10 through 14). It served this purpose for 40 years. Since the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters' recent move to Seattle, however, the number of Weyerhaeuser staff occupying the WTC has dropped significantly. The campus was sold to IRG and name of the facility changed to the Greenline Technology Center. Today, much of the square footage of the former WTC is leased to the company International Paper (Bylin 2018). CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 20 C "") Camino Figure 10 Entrance to the Weyerhaeuser Technology Center; north elevation. Figure 11 Weyerhaeuser Technology Center; north elevation. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 21 ' car-Clnv Figure 12 Weyerhaeuser Technology Center; south elevation. Figure 13 South elevation of Weyerhaeuser Technology Center as viewed from the service yard. The fire hydrant marks the original boundary of the yard, with the pavement in the foreground located within the 1990s expansion area. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 22 "� Camino Figure 14 Some of the outbuildings that have been constructed outside the WTC since the 1990s expansion of the yard; facing south. Historic Property Evaluation The WTC was constructed 40 years ago in 1977/1978, and outbuildings located in its service yard were constructed after this time. So, while the WTC is not without architectural merit, its date of construction places it outside of the 45-year threshold for consideration for eligibility for local, state, and national registers of historic places under SEPA. The WHIR and NRHP ordinarily use an age threshold of 50 years old or older for determinations of eligibility. However, because the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters campus was itself determined eligible prior to reaching the 50- year threshold for consideration for NRHP eligibility, Cardno evaluated the WTC for potential eligibility under Criteria Consideration G: a property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance. While the WTC was designed by the same architects responsible for the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters, it was not conceived as part of that innovative, award -winning master plan. Archival research has failed to identify a noteworthy and widespread level of contemporary or retrospective public or professional interest in the design of the building. Despite the quality of design of the building, Cardno concludes that, on its own merits, the WTC does not achieve the level of exceptional importance needed to be considered eligible for the NRHP under Criteria Consideration G. Recommendations Due to the dates of construction, Cardno recommends that the WTC and its associated outbuildings are Not Eligible for listing in the WHIR or NRHP. In addition, although the City of Federal Way appears to be in the process of establishing a register of historic places, formal agreements are not yet in place. Therefore, no buildings are eligible for a local register either. As an ineligible property, the WTC and its associated outbuildings do not merit consideration of project effects for the proposed development project. Cardno recommends the WTC and its outbuildings be evaluated in 10 years when the building meets the NRHP's minimum age threshold of 50 years old. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 23 Cal-cl"Cr Given the low potential for encountering buried cultural resources, Cardno does not recommend an intensive archaeological survey be completed for the proposed project. However, Cardno does recommend that a Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan (MIDP) be developed to outline steps to be taken by Federal Way Campus, LLC to minimize potential impacts to any currently unknown intact archaeological resources in the event of an inadvertent discovery during construction. These steps would serve to minimize damage to any inadvertently discovered archaeological resources during ground -disturbing activities, which may include small, deeply buried, and/or widely dispersed historic or precontact cultural materials (e.g., saws, saw blades, railroad ties, stakes, and footings; glass bottles; sanitary cans; chipped -stone tools; ground stone; beads; shell; faunal remains; human remains; funerary objects; and objects of cultural patrimony). Steps included in the MIDP would outline the applicable local laws and regulations, stop -work and notification protocols, discovery protection measures, assessment by professional archaeologists, and consultation with the DAHP and any affected Indian tribes. In the state of Washington, archaeological sites are protected from knowing disturbance on both public and private lands. RCW 27.44 and RCW 27.53.060 require that a person obtain a permit from the DAHP before excavating, removing, or altering Native American human remains or archaeological resources in Washington. A failure to obtain a permit is punishable by civil fines and penalties under RCW 27.53.095 and criminal prosecution under RCW 27.53.090. Cardno recommends spot monitoring of project -related ground -disturbing activities within Holocene sediments by a professional archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior's (SOI's) professional qualifications standards (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 61) for archaeology or by a qualified archaeologist supervised by a professional archaeologist who meets the SOI standards. Spot monitoring entails a weekly site visit to the project area during ground -disturbing activities and allows for a previously unexamined substrate to be observed by personnel qualified in the identification of archaeological materials in order to evaluate the subsurface deposition of the project area. Ground -disturbing activities include removal of any existing asphalt that extends into native fill and alluvial sediments, site grading, development of staging areas, and installation of utilities and structural foundation pilings. Monitoring should occur on a schedule determined in consultation with Federal Way Campus, LLC, the SOI-qualified archaeologist, and the DAHP only during ground disturbance that extends from the ground surface to the base of the Holocene sediments, which will vary in elevation across the project area, but typically do not exceed 18 inches below ground surface. The spot schedule should be determined during development of the MIDP. In addition, the monitor should be available on -call to respond to any potential inadvertent discoveries that would be reported in the manner outlined in the MIDP. Please feel free to contact Ms. Ferris should you have any questions regarding the assessment of cultural significance or recommendations. Sincerely, Daniel B. Costa Staff Archaeologist CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com 24 � J Gard" March 16, 2018 Michelle Sadlier, MA Project Architectural Historian l Jennifer Ferris, MA, RPA Senior Archaeologist PNW Cultural Resources Practice Lead Direct Line: 206.239.7390 Email: iennifer.ferris .cardno.cam_ CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 References Cited 25 <') Carclna Ames, K.M., and H.D.G. Maschner 1999 Peoples of the Northwest Coast: Their Archaeology and Prehistory. Thames and Hudson, Ltd., London. Anderson Map Company 1907 Page 14 - Township 21 North, Range 4 East. From King County 1907, Washington. Anderson Map Co. Electronic document, http://www.historicmapworks.com/. Baldwin, G.L. 2014 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase V (S 340th Street to S 359th Street) Project, Federal Way. Report prepared by Drayton Archaeology. Report prepared for Widener and Associates. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Bard, J.C., and L. Durio 2006 FINAL REPORT: Cultural Resources Discipline Report for 1-5 SR 161/SR 18 Triangle Improvements. Report prepared by BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc. Report prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Bartoy, K.M. 2013 Site 45KI00719 Washington Archaeological Site Inventory Form Update. On file, Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Becker, P. 2006 Pierce County — Thumbnail History. HistoryLink Essay No. 8001. Electronic document, http://www.historylink.org/. Booth, D.B., and B. Goldstein 1994 Patterns and Processes of Landscape Development by the Puget Lobe Ice Sheet. In Regional Geology of Washington State, edited by R. Lasmanis and E.S. Cheney, pp. 207-218. Washington State Department of Natural Resources Division, Olympia, Washington. Brubaker, L.B. 1991 Climate Change and the Origin of Old -Growth Douglas -Fir Forests in the Puget Sound Lowland. In Wildlife and Vegetation of Unmanaged Douglas -Fir Forests, edited by Leonard F. Ruggiero, Keith B. Aubry, Andrew B. Carey, and Mark F. Huff, pp 17-24. U.S. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 2018 General Land Office Records. Electronic document, https:Hglorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx?searchTabIndex=0&searchByTypeIndex=1. Bylin, A. 2018 Personal communication with the Operations and Facility Manager for the Weyerhaeuser Technology Center. February 23, 2018. Carlson, C.C. 2003 The Bear Cove Fauna and the Subsistence History of Northwest Coast Maritime Culture. In Archaeology of Coastal British Columbia: Essays in Honour of Philip M. Hobler, edited by R.L. Carlson, pp. 65-86. Archaeology Press, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com �,"� Cardnv March 16, 2018 26 Carlson, R.L. 1990 Cultural Antecedents. In Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, pp. 60-69. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 7, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Caster, D. 2004 Natural History, Geology and Geography of the Federal Way Area. Historical Society of Federal Way, Federal Way, Washington. 2015 Historical Society of Federal Way Timeline. Historical Society of Federal Way, Federal Way, Washington. Chesley, F. 2008 Puyallup — Thumbnail History. HistoryLink Essay No. 8447. Electronic document, hftp://www.historylink.org/File/8447. City of Federal Way 2015 Official Zoning Map. Electronic document, hffp://www.ci.federal- way.wa. us/sites/defau It/files/maps/Zoning_0. pdf. City of Puyallup 2018 History: The Land of the Generous People. Electronic document, hftp://www.ci.puyallup.wa.us/524/History. Dailey, T. No date. Coast Salish Villages of Puget Sound: Village Descriptions Puyallup -Tacoma. Electronic document, hftp://www.coastsalishmap.org/Village_Descriptions_Puyallup-Tacoma.htm#13. Digital Sanborn Maps 1867-1970 Fire Insurance Maps. Sanborn Map Company, New York. Electronic document, hftp://sanborn.umi.com.ezproxy.spi.org/, accessed January 2018. Dixon, E.J. 1993 Quest for the Origins of the First Americans. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Dragovich, J.D., P.T., Pringle, and T.J. Walsh 1994 Extent and geometry of the mid -Holocene Osceola Mudflow in the Puget Lowland: Implications for Holocene sedimentation and paleogeography. Washington Geology 22(3):3-2. Dragovich, J.D., R.L. Logan, H.W. Schasse, T.J. Walsh, W.S. Lingley, Jr., D.K. Norman, W.J. Gerstel, T.J. Lapen, J.E. Shuster, and K.D. Meyers 2002 Geologic Map of Washington - Northwest Quadrant. Geologic Map Gm-50. Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Olympia, Washington. Earley, A. 2005 Cultural Resources Assessment of the Thompson Park Project, Federal Way, King County, Washington. Report prepared by Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. Report prepared for the City of Federal Way. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Easterbrook, D.J. 2003 Quaternary Geology of the United States: INQUA 2003 Field Guide Volume. The Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 27 ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 2017 Greenline Business Park, Process IV Land Use Application with SEPA. Letter to Jim Harris, Community Development Department, from Matt Reider, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, Federal Way, WA. Fedje, D.W., and T. Christensen 1999 Modeling paleoshorelines and locating early Holocene coastal sites in Haida Gwaii. American Antiquity 64:635-652. Fladmark, K.R. 1979 Routes: alternate migration corridors for early man in North America. American Antiquity 44:55-69. Forsman, L.A., D.W. Lewarch, J.B. Cooper, and L.L. Larson 1999 Regional Express/Federal Way and Star Lake Project Cultural Resource Assessment Federal Way Alternative. Report prepared by LAAS. Report prepared for Sverdrup, Inc. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Franklin, J.F., and C.T. Dyrness. 1988 Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-8. Portland, Oregon. Griffith, G. 2005 1-5 Pierce County Line to Tukwila Stage 4 HOV project, Chessman house site. Letter to Craig Holstine, WSDOT, from Gregory Griffith, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. Haeberlin, H.K., and E. Gunther 1930 The Indians of Puget Sound. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Helvey, S.W., and D.C. Overbay 2017 Geotechnical Engineering Services Report, Greenline Business Park former Weyerhaeuser Site Federal Way Washington. Prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc. Report prepared for Federal Way Campus, LLC. King County Tax Assessor's Office 2018 King County Parcel Viewer KCGIS Center. Electronic document, http://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/parceiviewer2/. Kirk, R., and R.D. Daugherty 2007 Archaeology in Washington. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Kroll Map Company 1912 Township 21 North, Range 4 East. From King County 1912, Washington. Kroll Map Co. Electronic document, http://www.historicmapworks.com/. 1926 Plate 014 - T. 21 N., R. 4 E., Edgewood, Jovita, Pacific City, Auburn, Puget Sound. From King County 1926, Washington. Kroll Map Co. Electronic document, http://www.historicmapworks.com/. Lentz, F.K. 1990 Kent Valley of Opportunity. Windsor Publications, Inc., Chatsworth, California. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com 1i�rdn� March 16, 2018 28 Liesch, B.A., C.E. Price, and K.L. Walters 1963 Geology and ground -water resources of northwestern King County, Washington. Water Supply Bulletin No. 20. Division of Water Resources, Department of Conservation, Olympia, Washington. Luttrell, C.T. 2005a Letter to Kimberly Farley Regarding 1-5: Pierce County Line to Tukwila Stage 4 HOV Project. Report prepared by Archaeological and Historical Services of Eastern Washington University. Report prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. 2005b Site 45KI00719 Washington Archaeological Site Inventory Form. On file, Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. 2006 Cultural Resources Investigations for Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Lake Dolloff Access Redevelopment Project. Report prepared by Archaeological and Historical Services of Eastern Washington University. Report prepared for Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Metsker, C.F. 1936 Township 21 N., Range 4 E., Auburn, Jovita, Pacific City, Buenna. From King County 1936, Washington. Chas. F. Metsker. Electronic document, http://www.historicmapworks.com/. 1940 King County 1940c. From King County 1940, Washington. Chas. F. Metsker. Electronic document, hftp://www.historicmapworks.com/. 1950 King County 1950c. From King County 1950, Washington. Chas. F. Metsker. Electronic document, hftp://www.historicmapworks.com/. 1980 King County 1980 to 1996 Tracing. From King County 1980 to 1996 Tracing, Washington. Chas. F. Metsker. Electronic document, http://www.historicmapworks.com/. Miss, C.J. 2008 SR 99: Alaskan Way Viaduct & Seawall Replacement Program: Results of the Archaeological Core Collection Program, Phase I. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Mullineaux, D.R. 1970 Geology of the Renton, Auburn, and Black Diamond Quadrangles, King County, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 672, Washington, D.C. Palmer, S.P. 1997 Holocene Geologic History and Sedimentology of the Duwamish and Puyallup Valleys, Washington. Washington Department of Natural Resources, Geology and Earth Resources Division, Olympia, Washington. Peto, E., A. McGlone, and D. Eggers n.d. Written history. Kent School District. Electronic document, http://164.116.204.29/curriculum/vtours/kent/site_info/index.html. Puyallup Tribe of Indians 2018 Our Tribe. Electronic document, http://www.puyallup-tribe.com/ourtribe/. www.cardno.com March 16, 2018 29 �," 1 Card►�ro Rinck, B., J. Piper, and E. Heideman 2012 Preliminary Cultural Resources Assessment of the Upper Clear Creek Mitigation Property Habitat Restoration, Tacoma. Report prepared by Northwest Archaeological Associates and SWCA Environmental Consultants. Report prepared for Port of Tacoma. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Roedel, K.W., L.A. Forsman, D.E. Leward, and L.L. Larson 2003 Salishan Redevelopment Archaeological Resources and Traditional Cultural Places Assessment, City of Tacoma, Pierce County, Washington. Report prepared by Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Ltd. Report prepared for Parametrix, Inc. and Tacoma Housing Authority. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Seattle Times 1977 Weyerhaeuser Center nears completion. Seattle Times, October 2, 1977: H19. Smith, M.W. 1940 The Puyallup-Nisqually. New York, Columbia University Press. Snyder, D.E., P.S. Gale, and R.F. Pringle 1973 Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Stein, A.J. 1999a Des Moines Thumbnail History. HistoryLink Essay No. 697. Electronic document, http://www.HistoryLink.org. 1999b Auburn Thumbnail History. History Link Essay No. 675. Electronic document, http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&file-id=675. 2003 Federal Way- Thumbnail History. HistoryLink Essay No. 4215. Electronic document, http://www.Historylink.org. Suttles, W., and B. Lane 1990 Prehistory of the Puget Sound Region. In Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, pp. 485-502. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 7, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Thomas Bros. 1955 King County 1955. From King County 1955, Washington. Thomas Bros. Electronic document, hftp://www.historicmapworks.com/. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2018 National Resources Conservation Service - Web Soil Survey. Electronic document, https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1997 Poverty Bay quadrangle, Washington. Map. 1:24,000-scale 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. 2003 Tacoma South quadrangle, Washington. Map. 1:24,000-scale 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. 2018 Historic Topographic Map Explorer. Electronic document, http://historicalmaps.aregis.com/usgs/. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com It , March 16, 2018 30 �'� Car-cinv Valiance, J.W., and K.M. Scott 1997 The Osceola Mudflow from Mount Rainier: Sedimentology and hazard implications of a huge clay -rich debris flow. GSA Bulletin 109:143-163. Waterman, T.T., V. Hilbert, J. Miller, and Z. Zahir 2001 Puget Sound Geography. Original Manuscript from T.T. Waterman. Lushootseed Press, Federal Way, Washington. Weaver, R.M. 2003 Puyallup River Side Channel Habitat Restoration Project, Cultural Resources Section 106 Assessment. Report prepared for the City of Tacoma, Environmental Engineering Department, by the Environmental History Company, Seattle. Weyerhaeuser Company 2018 History Since 1900. Electronic document, https://www.weyerhaeuser.com/company/history/. Williams, R.W., R.M. Laramie, and J.J. Ames 1975 A Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Volume 1, Puget Sound Region. Washington State Department of Fisheries, Olympia. Yount, J.C., J.P. Minard, and G.R. Dembroff 1993 Geologic Map of Surficial Deposits in the Seattle 30 X 60 Quadrangle. OFR 93-233. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.cardno.com N s CD n O "S Q N rr c cD M l m �1 m cn W N 51 O CO m �1 m CT W N 1 a1 rn a\ N cn c.n vi v, to to to is c.n . t� X vi to vi to N N N N N N N N N N N N . N N N a\ rn o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 rn LA ON LA( to "D A. � .A "o Zo A "o "D A Zo � ) O O O O N 00 01 N O V1 W w CD all A N to W W N N 0 C) CD Cl 0 O� O\ C)W �-' �] w W is N �--' w N �] C:)d1 N Y Y ran m n n n Y D a cn cn 0 a ° z n > z cn cn z r V) m a Utno d w M �� m m rnn D C) n cn cn z to o 0 0- m rn 0� x ° az�dzro z C/D v' tz)d d d to < Z rn C� ° y r > mLo 'b j cn a° n Fo4 m> z�mo z n r �< �yy rn r v r `� d C) r as a a a a a a a a mac)(nC) zzz m C7 C7 C) C) C) a a v N O a r<n cn l 7 0 N O a mran cn m 0 N O O y W N N C lc 7 •C � C) 0 Z 00 cn Y `y cn b .p o 0 z� U)� Y LnC/) b �-P, O 0 z Y b „� O O z O u A can v ON O o a �� 8- a1 N a d N "D N N z <C/) cn�� `� w 00 to w N w m �D w N x W w N �--' w C M� w 00 O cn w N cn N .p C,a a C n .- w 7� Y r y < z w '--' w Y C w w N w y < m O ° k W 0 ❑ m [mil to 2 m -' cn � 0 YY a 00 O N � o<m�=�= a 00o O N z N o a a 00 °° O r 0 p N 00 CT C) r x° N 00 01 C) r N 00 O\ C) r 0 N 00 01 ° �cn�CCC�' � y 00 0 c, M a o d� a a 0 0 w a 00 0 o a 0000 0 a 0 N d a a 00 Do a� o o �aC m Z W a o d r a a 00 O w C a 00 o za rn cv'iy by N Imo �@ --h CD 0. `= x A o� a� a Z y z3 O CD EF EF Cl) a� CD Q n 0 o a) 3 — � ca. OD a �a CD N N CD N City Of 300' Notification A. ...a for Map Date May20t6 City of Federal Way Gis Division 33325 1111 Ave S. Federal Way Tax Parcel 152104-9178 Federal Way 00 98063 (206) - 835 - 7000 www. cityoffed a ra Iwa y.co m k 5i -- ..1...T- I - -- t eras Ways - Oth Street & Ride 2 1 162104 9056 h5L' CO r 1.1 162104 9030 Legend Subject Site Tax Parcels Notified King County Tax Parcels _ 215465 152104 0100 9052 323R' 152104 9167 = 215465 215465 y 0160 0120 215465 a3 152104 152104 0180.E 9037 9153 ¢z4 152104 9145 152104 152i0r 9178 9142 152104 9022 - y 93:iiH a 152104 a 152104 9026 $ 9201 152104 152104 152104 - - w 9030 9141 9030 - } y i 152104 152104 9123 9178 3BTH ${ 162104 9013 e - Aim - a - a� wy �4 3w 3 1-/r sa Norlh 162104 9036 Lake y fy 162104 — 9030 - - s naT,I Si-, e M / [fTY OF N _ " Federal Way 0 150 300 This map is •ni-mdcd for. a graph•eil represen!.rl ,r, iil moon= Feet The City of F• cleral Way rwAt's no wa•r3n1y as to its-i:c.:: _•! CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 3, 2018 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Sarady Long, Senior Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Jim Harris FOR DRC MTG. ON: May 24, 2018 DATE - Internal Discussion to review if application is now complete, and timeframe for technical review comments. FILE NUMBER(s): 17-105490-00-SE & 17-105489 UP RELATED FILE NOS.: Lots PROJECT NAME: GREENLINE BUSINESS PARK PROJECT ADDRESS: *NO SITE ADDRESS* ZONING DISTRICT: CP-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review for development of (3) new dings of varying sizes, reconfiguration and addition of .associated parking spaces, ROW dedication and frontage improvements. Existing Greenline Technology Center will remain. LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT TBD ERIC LABRIE - ESM MATERIALS SUBMITTED: See Green Resubmittal Sheet New SEPA checklist TIA Visual Impact Analysis JARPA Air Quality Report Cultural Resources Study Cover Letter from ESM, dated April 30, 2018 4%L MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF 33325 80' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 CITY OF FEDERAL 4`,': :l www.cit offederalwa .coin COMMUNITY 0—EVELOPME. APPLICATION NO(S) 7- 1,05- Y 9 0 - 5 E_ Date 11-1 N' — / 7 Project Name Greenling Business Park Property Address/Location Generally 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way S SE 16-21-014 Parcel Number(s) 162104-9056, -9013, -9030 and 1521049178 Project Description Development of 3 new buildings of varying sizes, reconfiguration and addition of associated parking spaces, ROW dedication and frontage improvements. Existing Greenline Technology Center will remain. See attached site plan for details. PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) ✓� Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI ✓� SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information CP-01 Zoning Designation Coorporate Park Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: Tom Messmer c/o Federal Way Campus, LLC Address: 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 City/State: Los Angeles, CA Zip: 90025 Phone: (310) 261-4382 Fax: Email:tmessmer rialrealtygroup.com Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Eric LaBrie, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC Address: 33400 8th Ave S, Suite 205 City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98003 Phone: 253-838-6113 Fax: 253-838-7104 Email: eric.labrie@esmcivil.com Signature: I d.4? Owner Name: Tom Messmer c/o Federal Way Campus, LLC Address:11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 City/State: Los Angeles, CA Zip: 90025 Phone: (310) 261-4382 Fax: Email: tmessmer@industrialrealtygroup.com Signature: Bulletin #003 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Bandouts\Master Land Use Application